Document/ExhibitDescriptionPagesSize 1: 20-F Annual Report of a Foreign Private Issuer HTML 2.66M
2: EX-1.1 Underwriting Agreement HTML 78K
3: EX-8.1 Opinion re: Tax Matters HTML 65K
4: EX-12.1 Statement re: Computation of Ratios HTML 11K
5: EX-12.2 Statement re: Computation of Ratios HTML 11K
6: EX-12.3 Statement re: Computation of Ratios HTML 11K
7: EX-13.1 Annual or Quarterly Report to Security Holders HTML 9K
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
ENEL S.p.A.
(Translation of registrant’s name into English)
Italy
(Jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
Viale Regina Margherita 137, Rome, Italy
(Address of principal executive offices)
Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to
Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of Each Class
Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered
American Depositary Shares
Ordinary shares with a par value of
€1 each
New York Stock Exchange
New York Stock Exchange(*)
Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to
Section 12(g) of the Act:
None
(Title of Class)
Securities for which there is a reporting obligation pursuant
to Section 15(d) of the Act:
None
(Title of Class)
Indicate the number of outstanding shares of each of the
issuer’s classes of capital or common stock as of the close
of the period covered by the annual report.
6,157,071,646 Ordinary Shares
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known
seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities
Act.
Yes ž No o
If this report is an annual or transition report, indicate by
check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports
pursuant to Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934.
Yes o No ž
Note — checking the box above will not relieve any
registrant required to file reports pursuant to Section 13
or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 from their
obligations under those sections.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed
all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes ž No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated
filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large
accelerated filer” in
Rule 12b-2 of the
Exhange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated
filer ž Accelerated
filer o Non-accelerated
filer o
Indicate by check mark which financial statement item the
registrant has elected to follow.
Item 17 o Item 18 ž
If this is an annual report, indicate by check mark whether the
registrant is a shell company (as defined in
Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act).
Yes o No ž
(*) Not for trading, but only in connection with the
registration of the American Depositary Shares.
Unless we indicate otherwise, the financial information
contained in this annual report is prepared in accordance with
International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”),
as adopted by the European Union (“EU”), that we have
applied for the first time in preparing our financial statements
for periods beginning after December 31, 2004. There are no
differences between IFRS, as adopted by the EU, and the IFRS, as
published by the International Accounting Standards Board
(“IASB”), relevant for our consolidated financial
statements. For a description of these principles, see
note 2 to our consolidated financial statements included in
this annual report. Until December 31, 2004, our financial
statements were prepared in accordance with Italian GAAP and, to
the extent such requirements or principles were silent on
particular issues and not at variance, by those standards laid
down by the International Accounting Standards Board (I.A.S.B.).
In relation to this transition to IFRS, in April 2005 the
Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) adopted
amendments to
Form 20-F to
provide a one time accommodation relating to first financial
statements prepared under IFRS for foreign private issuers
registered with the SEC. This accommodation permits Enel for its
first year of reporting under IFRS to report two years rather
than three years of statements of income, changes in
shareholders’ equity and cash flows prepared in accordance
with IFRS, with appropriate related disclosure and respective
reconciliation of financial statement items to generally
accepted accounting principles in the United States of America
(“U.S. GAAP”).
IFRS differ in certain respects from generally accepted
accounting principles in the United States
(“U.S. GAAP”). We describe these differences in
notes 21-22 to our consolidated financial statements.
Unless indicated otherwise, any reference in this annual report
to our consolidated financial statements is to the consolidated
financial statements (including the notes to the consolidated
financial statements) included in Item 18.
We publish our consolidated financial statements in euros. In
this annual report, unless we specify otherwise or the context
otherwise requires:
•
References to “dollars,”“$” and
“U.S. dollars” are to United States dollars;
•
References to “€
” or “euro” are to the euro, the single
currency established for participants in the third stage of the
European Economic and Monetary Union, or EMU, commencing
January 1, 1999; and
•
References to “lire,”“lira” or
“Lit.” are to Italian lire.
To facilitate a comparison, all lire-denominated financial data
for periods prior to January 1, 2001, included in this
annual report have been restated from lire to euro at the fixed
rate as of December 31, 1998 established by the European
Central Bank of Lit. 1,936.27 =
€1.00.
For convenience only and except where we specify otherwise, we
have translated certain euro figures into dollars at the rate of
€1.00 = $1.1842,
the noon buying rate in The City of New York for cable transfers
in foreign currencies as announced by the Federal Reserve Bank
of New York for customs purposes (the “noon buying
rate”) on December 31, 2005, the date of the most
recent balance sheet included in this annual report. By
including convenience currency translations in this annual
report, we are not representing that the euro amounts actually
represent the dollar amounts shown or could be converted into
dollars at the rates indicated. On May 31, 2006, the noon
buying rate for the euro was
€1.00 = $1.2833.
For information about the rate of exchange between the dollar
and the euro since January 1, 2000, you should read
“Item 3. Key Information — Exchange
Rates.”
Unless otherwise specified or the context requires otherwise,
references in this annual report to statistical, market and
forecast data have been obtained or derived from industry
sources and other publicly available information, such as
industry reports published by the GRTN (as defined in the
Glossary below), Terna and the Energy Authority (as defined in
the Glossary below). Certain data may be revised from that
presented in our annual reports on
Form 20-F for
prior years to reflect subsequent updates to, or changes in,
such data. Unless otherwise indicated, statistical data and
other information presented herein regarding market trends and
our market position relative to competitors represent our best
estimates as of the date hereof based on data derived from
publicly available sources or other information obtained from
independent third parties. Although we believe that such sources
are reliable, we have not independently verified such
information.
Adjustments
Certain figures included in this annual report have been subject
to rounding adjustments. Accordingly, figures shown for the same
category presented in different tables may vary slightly and
figures shown as totals in certain tables may not be an
arithmetic aggregation of the figures which precede them.
In this annual report, “Enel” and the
“Company” refer to ENEL S.p.A. and the terms
“Enel Group,”“Group,”“we,”“us” and “our” refer to ENEL S.p.A. together
with its consolidated subsidiaries. In this document, when we
use the word “currently,” we mean as of the date of
this annual report.
The following are definitions of certain terms and abbreviations
that we use in this report. The explanations of
electricity-related terms are not technical definitions, but are
intended to assist you in understanding their meaning.
Antitrust Authority
The Italian Antitrust Authority.
Average thermal efficiency
A measure of the efficiency of a thermal generating plant in
converting sources of energy such as fuel oil into electricity.
Average thermal efficiency is expressed as the amount of
electricity actually produced in kWh as a percentage of the kWh
equivalent of the energy source consumed.
Bersani Decree
Legislative Decree No. 79 of March 16, 1999, aimed at
liberalizing the Italian electricity market.
CIP 6
Regulation 6/92 issued by Comitato Interministeriale
Prezzi, an Italian governmental committee, which established
incentives for new generation plants using renewable resources
and for the sale of electricity produced from renewable
resources.
CO2
Carbon dioxide.
Combined Cycle Gas Turbine (or “CCGT”)
A type of generating plant that produces electricity through
both gas turbines and steam turbines. Conventional boilers or
other generators recover and use the exhaust heat exiting from
gas turbines.
Co-generation
The simultaneous generation of steam and electricity, typically
where the need arises for industrial purposes.
Communications Authority
The Italian Authority for the Guarantee of Communications.
Decommissioning
The phase of declassification, decontamination and dismantling
of nuclear power installations and clean up of the plant site
with the aim of achieving: (i) the complete demolition of
the nuclear power plant; (ii) the removal of any limitation
due to the presence of radioactive material; and (iii) the
restoration of the site for other activities.
Eligible Customer
Electricity customers in Italy who meet consumption thresholds
that permit them to participate in the free market for
electricity.
Emission trading rights
Tradable emission permits that give the right to produce the
equivalent of one ton of carbon dioxide. These permits can
either be assigned through a national allowance plan or earned
through investments in projects in developing countries
(Certified Emission Reductions) or in transition economies
countries (Emission Reduction Units).
Energy Authority
The Italian Authority for Electric Energy and Gas.
Environment Ministry
The Italian Ministry of the Environment.
Gencos
The three generating companies we disposed of in order to comply
with the Bersani Decree, Elettrogen S.p.A. (now Endesa Italia
S.p.A.), Eurogen S.p.A. (now Edipower S.p.A.) and Interpower
S.p.A. (now Tirreno Power S.p.A.).
Generating unit
An electric generator together with the turbine or other device
which drives it.
Gigawatt (GW)
1,000,000,000 watts (1,000 megawatts).
Gigawatt hour (GWh)
One gigawatt of power supplied or demanded for one hour.
GHG
“Greenhouse gases,” which are gases that contribute to
the greenhouse effect, such as carbon dioxide, methane, nitrous
oxide, chlorofluorocarbons and ozone.
Gross installed capacity
The maximum power that can be produced continuously throughout a
prolonged period of operation with all equipment assumed to be
fully operational.
GRTN
Gestore del Sistema Elettrico — GRTN S.p.A. (formerly
Gestore della Rete di Trasmissione Nazionale), a company owned
by the MEF that until October 2005 mainly managed Italy’s
national electricity transmission grid. These activities were
transferred to Terna in November 2005. Since that time, the GRTN
has focused on managing and promoting renewable resources (an
activity it carried out also prior to November 2005). GRTN also
owns the Single Buyer and the Market Operator (both as defined
below).
Independent power producers
Industrial companies that produce electricity for their own use
and for sale to third parties.
Italian power exchange (Borsa dell’Energia Elettrica)
A virtual marketplace in which producers, importers,
wholesalers, the GRTN and Terna, other Eligible Customers and
the Single Buyer buy and sell electricity at prices determined
through a competitive bidding process.
Kilovolt (kV)
1,000 volts.
Kilovolt ampere (kVA)
1,000 volts ampere.
Kilowatt (kW)
1,000 watts.
Kilowatt hour (kWh)
One kilowatt of power supplied or demanded for one hour.
Market Operator
The entity, wholly owned by the GRTN, that manages the Italian
power exchange.
Marzano Law
Law No. 239 of August 23, 2004, aimed at reorganizing
existing energy market regulation and further liberalizing the
energy market.
MEF
The Italian Ministry of the Economy and Finance and its
predecessor, the Ministry of the Treasury, Budget and Economic
Planning.
Megawatt (MW)
1,000,000 watts (1,000 kilowatts).
Megawatt hour (MWh)
One megawatt of power supplied or demanded for one hour.
Megavolt ampere (MVA)
1,000,000 volts ampere.
Ministry of Productive Activities
The Italian Ministry of Productive Activities and its
predecessor, the Ministry of Industry, Commerce and
Handcrafts.
The maximum power that can be produced continuously throughout a
prolonged period of operation with all equipment assumed to be
fully operational, as measured at the point of entry to the
transmission network (or minus the power absorbed by plant use
and the power lost in the transformers required to raise the
voltage to the network level).
Non-Eligible Customers
Electricity customers in Italy who do not meet consumption
thresholds entitling them to participate in the free market.
NH3
Ammonia.
NOx
Nitrogen oxides.
Orimulsion
Abbreviation of “Orinoco emulsion,” which is a fossil
fuel from the Orinoco river basin in Venezuela consisting of
very fine bitumen dispersed in water. Orimulsion emits the same
amount of
CO2
as fuel oil of equivalent energy value.
Resellers
Other distribution companies to whom we transport electricity
because their networks are attached to our network rather than
directly to the national transmission grid.
Single Buyer (Acquirente Unico)
A company wholly owned by the GRTN, responsible for ensuring the
supply of electricity to regulated customers who do not yet have
access to the liberalized electricity market.
SO2
Sulfur dioxide.
Substation
Equipment which switches and/or changes or regulates the voltage
of electricity in a transmission and/or distribution network.
Terawatt (TW)
1,000,000,000,000 watts (1,000 gigawatts).
Terawatthour (TWh)
One terawatt of power supplied or demanded for one hour.
Thermal unit
A generating unit which uses combustible fuel as the source of
energy to drive an electric generator.
IDENTITY OF DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND ADVISORS
Not applicable.
ITEM 2.
OFFER STATISTICS AND EXPECTED TIMETABLE
Not applicable.
ITEM 3.
KEY INFORMATION
The Enel Group
Energy Generation, Distribution and Sales
We are the principal electricity operator in Italy, with the
leading position in the generation, distribution and sale of
electricity. At December 31, 2005, we had net installed
capacity in Italy of approximately 42.2 GW, which we estimate to
have represented approximately 49% of total Italian net
installed capacity at that date. Our net electricity production
in Italy in 2005 was 112.1 TWh, and, based on data provided by
Terna, we estimate that our production represented approximately
39% of Italian net production during 2005. In 2005, in Italy, we
distributed 259.3 TWh of electricity and sold 148.2 TWh of
electricity to end users. Of the total sold, 129.7 TWh were sold
to approximately 30 million customers on the regulated
market, of which approximately 23.5 million were
residential customers (86.9% of all residential customers in
Italy, based on our estimations) and 18.5 TWh were sold on the
free market. At December 31, 2005, we also had electricity
generation plants outside Italy (in Spain, Bulgaria and North,
Central and South America) with aggregate net installed capacity
of approximately 3.8 GW, as well as sales and distribution
operations in Spain with more than 0.6 million customers.
In addition, in April 2005 we acquired distribution and sales
operations in Romania with approximately 1.4 million
customers and in April 2006 we acquired generation operations in
Slovakia with a gross installed capacity of approximately
7,000 MW. Based on revenues, we were one of the largest
industrial companies in Italy in 2005, with operating revenues
of
€34,059 million,
or approximately $40,333 million. We earned net income of
€3,895 million,
or approximately $4,612 million, in 2005.
We are also active in the import, distribution and sale of
natural gas. In 2005, we sold approximately 6.7 billion
cubic meters of gas to third parties, of which approximately
5.1 billion cubic meters were sold to nearly
2.1 million end users.
Until June 2004, we owned 100% of Terna, the principal Italian
electricity transmission company, which currently owns more than
90% of the transmission assets of Italy’s national
electricity grid. In light of Italian laws and regulations
providing for the reunification of the ownership and management
of the Italian transmission grid and imposing certain ownership
restrictions on the entity that will own and manage it, in June
2004, we sold 50% of Terna’s share capital in an initial
public offering in Italy and a private placement with certain
institutional investors that was not registered under the
Securities Act (“the “Terna IPO”). In April 2005,
we sold an additional 13.86% of Terna’s share capital in
another private placement that was not registered under the
Securities Act. In September 2005, we sold an additional 29.99%
of Terna’s share capital to Cassa Depositi e Prestiti and
in January 2006 we distributed 1.02% of Terna’s share
capital as “bonus” shares that we had promised to
certain Italian retail investors as part of the Terna IPO, thus
reducing our current stake in Terna to 5.12%. In November 2005,
the management of the Italian transmission grid was transferred
from the GRTN to Terna, which was renamed Terna — Rete
Elettrica Nazionale.
Other Operations
One of the objectives of our management is to focus on on our
core energy operations. In line with this strategy of focusing
on our core energy operations, in February 2006 we completed the
sale of Wind, our telecommunication company, to Weather
Investments, a company in which we have a 26.1% interest.
Nonetheless, we remain active in other sectors, including real
estate services, engineering and construction, information
technology, personnel training and administration, factoring and
insurance services.
Internal organizations
At the end of 2005, our management decided to re-organize the
Group’s internal structure by dividing our Sales
Infrastructure and Networks Division into two separate divisions
(a Market Division and an Infrastructure and Networks Division)
and by allocating our international generation and distribution
operations, which had previously been included in other
divisions, to a new International Division. This reorganization
is effective as of January 1, 2006 and, therefore, our
divisions are currently the following: Generation and Energy
Management Division, Market Division, Infrastructure and
Networks Division and the International Division. Each division
is headed by a senior manager who reports directly to the Chief
Executive Officer of Enel. Moreover, all non-core activities
provided by companies of the Group to other Group companies have
been grouped in our Services and Other Activities sector. Enel,
as the parent company, defines the strategic objectives for the
Enel Group and coordinates the activities of all Group
companies. Each of Enel, our divisions and the Services and
Other Activities sector constitutes a reportable segment for
financial reporting purposes.
Ownership
The Ministry of Economy and Finance of the Republic of Italy, or
the MEF, currently owns 21.4% of Enel’s shares, and Cassa
Depositi e Prestiti S.p.A., a company 70% owned by the MEF and
30% owned by a consortium of Italian banking foundations, owns
10.2% of Enel’s shares.
Strategy
We have worked to face the challenges posed by market
deregulation by capitalizing on our expertise in the electricity
and gas sectors and by seeking new opportunities for growth in
Italy and abroad. We have refocused our operations on our core
energy businesses, and we aim to achieve cost leadership in the
generation, distribution and sale of electricity and gas, and
make customer care a high priority. In addition, we will
continue to evaluate strategically relevant international
opportunities, both in new markets and in our existing markets,
such as Spain, Bulgaria and Romania and, in the area of
renewable energy, in North, Central and South America.
You should read the following selected consolidated financial
data together with “Item 5. Operating and Financial
Review and Prospects” and our consolidated financial
statements and notes thereto included elsewhere in this annual
report.
Our consolidated income statement data for each of the two years
in the period ended December 31, 2005 and the consolidated
balance sheet data at December 31, 2004 and 2005 set forth
below have been prepared in accordance with IFRS as adopted
by EU, which differs in certain significant aspects from
U.S. GAAP. For an explanation and quantification of such
differences, see note 21 to our consolidated financial
statements.
Natural gas sold to end users (billions of cubic meters)
1.1
4.0
4.4
5.2
5.2
Natural gas sales customers at year end (millions)
0.6
1.7
1.8
2.0
2.1
Employees
72,661
71,204
64,770
61,898
51,778
(1)
We have translated euro amounts into dollar amounts at the noon
buying rate for euro on December 31, 2005, of
€1.00 = $1.1842.
(2)
We calculate earnings per share by dividing our consolidated net
income by the number of Enel’s ordinary shares outstanding
during each period. Prior to Enel’s initial public offering
in November 1999, all of Enel’s ordinary shares were owned
by the MEF. At December 31, 2005, the MEF owned 21.4% and
its subsidiary Cassa Depositi e Prestiti owned 10.2% of
Enel’s ordinary shares. You should consider that
Enel’s share capital was Lit. 12,126,150,379,000
(corresponding to
€6,262,634,023)
divided into 12,126,150,379 shares with a par value of each
share of Lit. 1,000 (corresponding to
€0.52) until
July 9, 2001, the date on which both the re-denomination of
Enel’s share capital in euros and a one-for-two reverse
stock split became effective. As a result of the re-denomination
and the reverse stock split, Enel’s share capital amounted
to
€6,063,075,189,
divided into 6,063,075,189 shares, each with a par value of
€1. As of
December 31, 2005 Enel’s share capital amounts to
€6,157,071,646
divided into 6,157,071,646 shares with a par value of
€1.
(3)
For information concerning differences between IFRS and
U.S. GAAP that are relevant to our consolidated financial
statements, you should read note 21 to our consolidated
financial statements.
(4)
You should read note 21 to our consolidated financial
statements for a discussion of the impacts generated by the
differences between IFRS and U.S. GAAP in calculating
operating income.
Includes gain on sale of Elettrogen, previously classified as
other non-operating income (expense).
(6)
Includes gain on sale of Eurogen, previously classified as other
non-operating income (expense).
(7)
Includes current portion of long-term debt.
(8)
Excludes current portion of long-term debt.
(9)
Including 2.6 GW of capacity of Interpower, which was divested
in January 2003.
(10)
Including 12.2 TWh generated by Elettrogen and Valgen before
they were divested during 2001, and 20.9 TWh generated by
Eurogen, which was divested in May 2002.
(11)
Including 8.0 TWh generated by Eurogen before it was divested,
and 5.7 TWh generated by Interpower.
(12)
Excluding sales to resellers.
(13)
Including electricity distributed to resellers.
Exchange Rates
The following table shows, for the periods indicated,
information concerning the exchange rate between the
U.S. dollar and the euro. These rates are provided solely
for your convenience. We do not represent that the euro could be
converted into U.S. dollars at these rates or at any other
rate.
The column of averages in the table below shows the averages of
the relevant exchange rates on the last business day of each
month during the relevant period. The high and low columns show
the highest and lowest exchange rates on any business day during
the relevant period.
Based on the Noon Buying Rate for the euro for the periods
indicated.
Enel’s ordinary shares are quoted in euros on Mercato
Telematico Azionario (“Telematico”), the Italian
automated screen-based trading market managed by Borsa Italiana
S.p.A. (“Borsa Italiana”). Enel’s American
Depositary Shares (“ADSs”) are quoted in
U.S. dollars and traded on the New York Stock Exchange
(“NYSE”).
You should carefully consider the risks described below and
all of the other information in this document. If any of the
risks described below actually occurs, our business, economic
and financial results and the trading price of Enel’s
ordinary shares or ADSs could be materially adversely
affected.
Risks Relating to our Energy Business
Future regulation could have a significant adverse effect
on our energy businesses and their profitability
Future laws and regulations issued by the European Union or the
Italian national and local authorities, in particular the
decisions and policies of the Energy Authority, may require
significant changes in our business or otherwise affect our
business in ways that we cannot predict. Any new regulations
that cause us to restructure or otherwise change our business or
significantly change the conditions under which we operate may
have a material adverse effect on our business prospects,
financial condition and results of operations. You should read
“Item 4. Information on the Company —
Regulatory Matters” for a discussion of these regulatory
matters.
Regulatory changes promoting market liberalization have
significantly increased competition in our energy
businesses
The Italian energy markets have been the object of numerous
regulatory initiatives designed to foster liberalization. The
most significant effects of these initiatives on the Italian
electricity market have been (i) a reduction in our
generating capacity (through the mandatory disposal of three
generating companies, the Gencos; (ii) the introduction of
limits on the amount of energy we may produce and import;
(iii) the introduction on April 1, 2004, of the
Italian power exchange, where prices are determined by
competitive bidding; (iv) the required disposal of certain
of our municipal networks to local utilities; and
(v) mandated increases in the number of consumers who are
eligible to buy electricity on the free market (with all
non-residential customers having become eligible as of
July 1, 2004, and all customers scheduled to become
eligible as of July 1, 2007).
In the generation business, our competitors include independent
power producers, municipal utilities and other operators of
electricity generating capacity, including Italian and
international power companies. In addition to the April 2004
introduction of the Italian power exchange, we expect that
competition will increase further due to:
•
An increase in bilateral contracts between our competitors and
final customers;
•
The construction of new generation facilities by our competitors
and the development of new interconnection lines that will
increase the volume of electricity that may be imported in
Italy; and
•
Possible initiatives taken by the Energy Authority to further
competition such as the imposition of virtual power plant
contracts and of restrictions on the operation of pumping plants.
Please see “Item 4. Information on the
Company — Business — The Enel
Group — Competition in the Electricity and Gas
Markets.”
In the sale of electricity, based on data from Terna and from
GRTN (for the years before 2005), we estimate that our market
share in Italy has decreased from 92% in 1999 to approximately
50% in 2005; our market share could decline further in coming
years as liberalization progresses. In sales of electricity on
the free market, we face competition both from other electricity
producers as well as from wholesalers that resell the
electricity they purchase.
Our ability to expand our business and increase operating
profits may be limited unless we are able to offset the decrease
in generation and sales volumes of our electricity business
through improved efficiency, increased sales in other areas of
our business or international expansion.
Our gas operations also expose us to risks relating to market
regulation. Italian regulations enacted in May 2000 have sought
to introduce competition gradually into the Italian natural gas
market. In particular, these regulations have eased entry into
some activities, including the import, export and sale of gas.
From January 1,
2003, gas sales were supposed to be completely liberalized, with
all customers eligible to choose their supplier and sellers able
to freely determine prices. However, the Energy Authority has
retained the right to control prices, mainly for residential
customers. We cannot predict whether or when these regulations
will result in a fully liberalized market, or how the natural
gas market will develop under these conditions.
Our strategy is to seek both to be the cost leader in the
generation of electricity and in the distribution and sale of
electricity and gas in Italy and to provide high quality
customer service. If we are unable to implement this strategy,
or are otherwise unable to adapt our core energy businesses to
meet these regulatory challenges, it may have a material adverse
effect on our business prospects, financial condition and
results of operations.
For a more complete description of the regulation of the Italian
energy industry and the way we expect regulatory matters to
affect the electricity and gas markets, you should read
“Item 4. Information on the Company —
Regulatory Matters.”
Our facilities are subject to operating risks outside of
our control; certain of our activities depend on third-party
patents and licenses
Our generation plants, as well as our distribution networks, are
constantly exposed to risks related to their malfunction and
other interruptions in service resulting from events outside of
our control. These events may result in increased costs and
other losses. Although we have acquired insurance coverage for
events of this nature in line with general market practice, our
coverage may prove insufficient to fully compensate us for any
increased costs or losses that may occur as a result of service
interruptions or malfunctions, with a consequent adverse effect
on our business prospects, financial condition and results of
operations. You should also read “— We face legal
proceedings and potential regulatory measures arising from the
2003 power outage that affected all of Italy that could have a
material adverse effect on our financial condition and results
of operations. Further power outages involving our electricity
operations could also adversely affect our financial condition
and results of operations,” below.
In addition, our “Telemanagement” digital electricity
meter project is dependent on certain communications components
and technology that are based on patents and licenses held by
third parties and may require certain additional related
services by third parties, such as maintenance. Please see
“Item 4. Information on the Company —
Business — The Enel Group — Sales,
Infrastructure and Networks — Domestic Distribution
and Sales Operations — Telemanagement System” for
a description of this project. Interruptions in the availability
of these components and technology or of the necessary related
services provided by such third parties may be outside of our
control, and could have a material adverse effect on our
financial condition and results of operations.
We may not be able to complete our power plant conversion
and other capital investment programs on schedule or realize the
expected benefits of these programs
In line with our strategy to reduce generation operating costs,
we are implementing a program to convert several of our thermal
generation plants to adopt more efficient technology or use
cheaper fuels, such as coal. We cannot predict whether we will
be able to complete our conversion program in accordance with
the schedule we have set or in the manner currently
contemplated, nor whether we will be able to realize the
anticipated benefits of this program. Any such failure could
have a material adverse effect on our business prospects,
financial condition and results of operations.
In addition, there is public opposition to our construction
plans and conversion of power plants in certain municipalities,
and we cannot exclude the possibility that in the future, such
opposition may have a material adverse effect on our development
plans, and, as a result, on our business.
Significant increases in fuel prices or disruptions in our
fuel supplies could have a negative effect on our
business
Our thermal generation plants use fuel oil, natural gas and coal
to generate electricity. Increases in energy prices therefore
have a direct effect on our operating costs. Both the cost and
availability of fuel are subject to
many economic and political factors and events occurring
throughout the world, particularly those that affect
fuel-producing regions. Although we attempt to manage our risk
through the use of financial instruments hedging our exposure to
fluctuations in the price of fuel, we can neither control nor
accurately predict these factors and events.
Given our conversion of significant generation capacity to
combined-cycle technology, we expect natural gas to constitute a
significant portion of our fuel consumption in the future. In
2005, approximately 46% of the electricity we produced at our
thermal plants was generated by plants using natural gas. We
currently obtain a significant portion of the natural gas we use
directly from Algeria and Nigeria through pipelines and by sea.
Imports of natural gas from these countries may be subject to
disruption due to a number of things, including maintenance
works on the pipelines and bad weather conditions at sea. Any
major disruption of this imported supply, as well as the
emergency measures that the Ministry of Productive Activities or
other Italian authorities may take in the event of such
disruption, could adversely affect our ability to generate
electricity using natural gas.
If in the future there are significant or unexpected changes in
the price of the fuels we use to generate electricity or if
adequate supplies of fuel become unavailable, our financial
condition and results of operations could be materially
adversely affected.
Our expansion outside of Italy subjects us to risks
associated with local market conditions, as well as to risks
associated with operating the businesses we acquire
In recent years, we have expanded our operations outside Italy.
Our operations abroad now include, among others, generation
plants in Spain, Bulgaria, Slovakia and North, Central and South
America, distribution networks and sales operations in Spain and
distribution networks and sales operations in Romania. In 2004,
we also established a joint venture to manage a generation plant
in Russia, in 2005 we entered into a non-binding memorandum of
understanding with French state-owned electricity company
Electricité de France S.A. (“EDF”) regarding an
industrial partnership that, among other things, provides for
our acquisition of a 12.5% stake in EDF’s EPR nuclear power
plant project.
We expect this international expansion to continue. In
particular, we have made binding offers to acquire interests in
additional electricity generation companies in Panama and
Slovakia and in June 2006 we (i) won the auction for a
67.5% interest in Electrica Muntenia Sud, a Romanian electricity
distribution company, (ii) entered into an agreement with
Grupo Rede for the acquisiton of 11 companies, which own
concessions to operate hydroelectric plants in Brazil with an
aggregate installed capacity of 98 MW, and
(iii) acquired from the ESN Group a 49.5% interest in Res
Holding, a Dutch company holding 100% of the Russian power
supplier company RusEnergoSbyt. Please see “Item 4.
Information on the Company — Business — The
Enel Group — Generation and Energy
Management — International Generation.” and
“Item 4. Information on the Company —
Business — The Enel Group — Sales,
Infrastructure and Networks-International Distribution and Sales
Operations.” We will continue to evaluate opportunities
outside Italy in the generation, distribution and sale of
electricity businesses in both the countries where we currently
operate and new markets.
This international expansion requires us to become familiar with
new markets and competitors in order to manage and operate these
businesses effectively, and exposes us to local economic,
regulatory and political risks. The process of integrating
acquired operations, personnel and information systems can also
be difficult and could absorb management time and resources and
distract management from other opportunities or problems in our
business and industry. In addition, some of the companies we
have acquired may require significant capital investments.
Operating internationally may also subject us to risks related
to currency exchange rate fluctuations, foreign investment
restrictions or restrictions on remittances by local
subsidiaries. Depending on the circumstances, unfavorable
developments in or affecting our operations outside Italy could
adversely affect our business prospects, financial condition and
results of operations.
In addition, in April 2006 we purchased 66% of Slovenske
Elektrarne (“SE”), which currently has four nuclear
power generating units with an aggregate net installed capacity
of 2,398 MW and two nuclear units under construction.
Prior to the closing of our purchase of SE, certain conditions
were fulfilled, including the approval by the Slovakian
government of the strategic investment plan we prepared for SE
for the 2006-2013 period and the transfer to state-owned
companies of the assets and liabilities of a nuclear power plant
that is in the process of being decommissioned, including spent
nuclear fuel and the radioactive waste produced by their
operations, and the disposal of a water plant, as well as the
approval by the Slovakian government of legislative provisions
for a new fund for the decommissioning of nuclear installations
in Slovakia and new rules governing the Slovakian electricity
market. Although we believe that all of SE’s existing
nuclear plants use internationally accepted technologies and are
managed in accordance with Western European standards, our
acquisition of the majority participation in SE’s share
capital exposes us to the risks of ownership and operation of
nuclear generating facilities, including the disposal and
storage of radioactive materials and spent fuel, as well as of
the potential harmful effects on the environment and human
health. In addition, while the Republic of Slovakia and SE have
ratified the Vienna Convention, potential limits may arise on
the amount and types of insurance commercially available to
cover the risks associated with these operations. Potential
risks may also arise in connection with the decommissioning of
these nuclear plants, particularly as the regulatory regime for
nuclear power and nuclear decommissioning in Slovakia is
currently in the process of being defined. We have not owned any
nuclear power plants since November 2000, and we have not
produced electricity from nuclear power plants since 1988.
Consistent with our strategy of international expansion, we may
make acquisitions of targets of very significant size. Without
making any commitments, certain banks have expressed an
intention to provide us with the financing necessary for such
acquisitions. Should we incur significant external debt to
finance any of these acquisitions, we would likely be required
to make certain undertakings to the relevant banks (as customary
for financings of this size and type), which could require us to
get the consent of these banks in order to be able to take
specified types of action. In addition, should we make any such
large acquisition, we will have to manage the significant
challenges inherent in our integration of the target’s
business and we cannot predict whether and to what extent any
such acquisition would be successful.
We face legal proceedings and potential regulatory
measures arising from the 2003 power outage that affected all of
Italy that could have a material adverse effect on our financial
condition and results of operations. Further power outages
involving our electricity operations could also adversely affect
our financial condition and results of operations
On September 28, 2003, Italy suffered a complete blackout
of electrical service that affected the entire country with the
exception of the island of Sardinia. After the blackout,
approximately 21 hours were necessary before electricity
again became available to all customers.
The Energy Authority in September 2004 initiated a formal
proceeding to determine whether certain companies, including our
subsidiaries Enel Produzione S.p.A. (“Enel
Produzione”), Enel Distribuzione S.p.A. (“Enel
Distribuzione”), Terna and Deval S.p.A.
(“Deval”), may have been partially responsible for the
blackout. In 2005, we settled the proceeding against Enel
Produzione through the payment of
€50,000. Although
no further fines may be imposed on Enel Produzione in connection
with this proceeding, the Energy Authority may still impose
measures to improve reliability of our energy supply, which may
have an adverse impact on our results of operations. The
proceedings remain pending against our subsidiaries Enel
Distribuzione and Deval, and a decision is expected by
October 31, 2006. If the Energy Authority finds that these
companies have been partially responsible for the blackout, it
may impose sanctions or request undertakings from them.
Furthermore, certain of our customers brought legal actions
against us in the Italian courts seeking damages as a result of
this blackout. Although the claims made by these plaintiffs are
for minor amounts, an increase in the number of decisions
finding us liable for such damages could result in an increase
in the number of such claims filed and the magnitude of the
damages sought. For more information on the civil and
administrative proceedings related to the blackout, please read
“Item 8. Financial Information — Other
Financial Information — Legal Proceedings —
Blackout litigation.”
While we do not believe we were responsible for the blackout, we
cannot exclude the possibility that we will be held liable for
it by Italian courts and/or the Energy Authority. Any finding of
liability on our part could result
in the imposition of fines and other administrative sanctions
and in additional lawsuits by other parties against us, which
could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition
and results of operations.
Although the blackout has not yet had a material impact on our
operations or financial results, we cannot provide any assurance
that further power outages or disruptions involving our
operations will not occur in the future, or that any such
outages or disruptions would not have a material adverse effect
on our financial condition and results of operations. In May
2005, the Energy Authority issued proposals for public comment
(through June 30, 2005) for the institution of a system of
automatic compensation payable by electricity distributors to
affected customers in the event of a blackout or other prolonged
service interruption. For a description of this proposal, please
see “Item 4. Information on the Company —
Regulatory Matters — Electricity
Regulation — Continuity and Quality of Service
Regulation.” The adoption of this system would augment the
economic risks we face in the event of any such interruption in
service.
We have been and are subject to regulatory investigations,
including for possible abuse of dominant position and market
abuse
We have been and are likely to continue to be subject to
regulatory and antitrust investigations in the Italian
electricity market. We are currently subject to an Antitrust
Authority investigation with respect to certain sharp increases
in the price of electricity on the Italian power exchange in
June 2004 and in January 2005. In April 2005, the Antitrust
Authority opened proceedings against Enel and Enel Produzione
after the Energy Authority officially concluded that these
increases may have been associated with violations of antitrust
law by us. For more information, please see “Item 8.
Financial Information — Other Financial
Information — Legal Proceedings.” If the
Antitrust Authority were to hold us liable for the abusive
practices alleged, it could impose a fine on us of up to 10% of
our total revenues in the preceding fiscal year.
Moreover, our subsidiary Enel Viesgo Generaciņn is
currently subject to antitrust investigations in Spain for
alleged abuse of dominant position. For more information please
see “Item 8. Financial Information — Other
Financial Information — Legal Proceedings.”
While we do not believe we have committed any violation of
antitrust laws, we cannot exclude the possibility that we will
be held liable in the current investigations by the antitrust
authorities in Italy or in Spain, nor that there will be other
such investigations by the Energy Authority, the Antitrust
Authority or other regulatory bodies in Italy or abroad in the
future. Should we be held liable in the current or any future
investigations, and should such liability result in the
imposition of significant fines or of material restrictions on
our activity, there could be a material adverse effect on our
financial condition and results of operations.
The European Commission has launched an investigation into
the functioning of the European energy market that could lead to
measures which could have a material adverse effect on our
operations
In June 2005, the European Commission launched an investigation
into the functioning of the European energy market. The overall
objective of the inquiry is to investigate the barriers to the
development of a fully functioning open and competitive EU-wide
energy market. In its preliminary report issued in February
2006, the European Commission identified market concentration,
vertical foreclosure, lack of market integration, lack of
transparency and price formation as the five main barriers to a
fully functioning EU-wide energy market. The European Commission
is expected to publish its final report at the end of 2006.
Although we cannot at this stage predict what actions the
European Commission may take as a result, we cannot foreclose
the possibility that the report will lead to the adoption of
measures that could adversely affect our operations.
The European Commission may decide that priority access
rights of long-term supply contracts are contrary to EU
law
In 2005, we controlled approximately 2,000 MW of the total
capacity for electricity imports into Italy pursuant to two
long-term supply contracts. Since April 1, 2004, the date
on which the Italian power exchange started operations, we sell
the electricity imported pursuant to these contracts to the
Single Buyer at terms set by an Italian ministerial decree.
Until December 31, 2005, these long-term supply contracts
enjoyed priority access to interconnection capacity for
2000 MW. However, in 2006, the French regulatory authority
has decided not to assign any reserved capacity for our import
of electricity under the terms of the long-term contract we
entered into with the French electricity company EDF. As a
consequence, only part of the electricity bought under this
contract has been imported into Italy, with the remaining part
being sold in France. We have appealed the decision of the
French regulatory authority. Moreover, in April 2006 the
European Commission has started proceedings against several
Member States, including Italy, for failure to enact EU
legislation. The proceedings also challenge priority access for
long-term supply contracts. If the European Commission concludes
that such rights are contrary to EU law, our ability to import
electricity under these contracts will be impaired and we will
probably be forced to pay congestion charges or to sell the
electricity under this contract abroad. We believe, however,
that the impact of this measure or any other measure adopted
further to a decision by the European Commission that priority
access rights are contrary to EU law would be in any event
limited, as the contract with EDF expires in 2007 and the
revenues derived from the other contract (which expires in 2011)
are not material.
A European Commission challenge to Italian regulations on
hydroelectric concessions could adversely affect our business,
financial condition and result of operations
We operate our hydroelectric plants pursuant to concessions
granted and regulated by national and local authorities. These
hydroelectric plants accounted for approximately 34% of our net
installed capacity in 2005 (with 4.7% of our net installed
capacity attributable to those in the Region of Trentino-Alto
Adige).
In January 2004, the European Commission determined that certain
Italian regulations regarding hydroelectric concessions were
contrary to EU law. In particular, the European Commission
objected to renewal preferences granted to existing holders of
concessions (and in the region of Trentino-Alto Adige, to the
operator controlled by the local authorities) upon the expiry of
those concessions, as well as to the fact that the regulations
provided for the expiration of all concessions in 2029 (and for
the region of Trentino-Alto Adige, in 2010), even though these
concessions had previously been of perpetual duration.
In December 2005, Italy amended the relevant regulations,
abrogating the renewal preferences and postponing the expiration
of all concessions for an additional 10 years. However, if
the European Commission continues to pursue its formal action
before the Court of Justice to enforce its request and the Court
of Justice affirms the European Commission’s opinion, our
hydroelectric concessions may be terminated prematurely and we
may not be able to renew these concessions at all or on
favorable terms. This could have a material adverse effect on
our business prospects, financial condition and results of
operations. The European Commission decision on whether to
continue its formal action is expected in the second half of
2006.
We are dependent on government concessions for our
electricity and gas distribution businesses
Recent laws have modified the expiration date for gas
distribution concessions. In 2000, a decree of the Ministry of
Productive Activities set the expiration date of gas
distribution concessions awarded prior to May 2000 by means
other than competitive tender at the earlier of their original
expiration date or December 31, 2005, with the expiration
date extendible for up to five years under certain conditions.
The Marzano Law, as interpreted by the Ministry of Productive
Activities in November 2004, provided instead that these
concessions are to expire at the earlier of their original
expiration date or December 31, 2007, with the expiration
date still extendible for up to five years under certain
conditions. The Italian administrative courts, however,
disagreed with the Ministry’s interpretation. As a result,
on February 23, 2006, a law confirmed that gas distribution
concessions expire by law at the earlier of their original
expiration date or December 31, 2007, and extended the
expiration date to December 31, 2009 under certain
conditions. Local authorities may extend this date by one
additional year. Furthermore, certain gas distribution
concessions for southern Italy, partially financed through
public funds made available in the context of a public incentive
plan for the use of natural gas in southern Italy, expire at the
later of June 21, 2012 or twelve years from the entry into
force of their approval by the Ministry of Economy and Finance.
Finally, gas distribution concessions awarded prior to May 2000
by competitive tenders expire at the earlier of their original
expiration date or December 31, 2012. Please see
“Item 4. Information on the Company —
Regulatory Matters — Gas Regulation” for more
details on gas distribution concessions. The majority of our
existing gas distribution concessions are currently due to
expire on December 31, 2009. If the
expiration date of our gas and electricity distribution
concessions is accelerated, or if we are unable to renew these
concessions upon their expiration, our financial condition and
results of operations could be materially adversely affected.
In November 2004, the Italian Region of Tuscany challenged the
Marzano Law before the Italian Constitutional Court regarding
the allocation of powers between the Italian State and the
regional governments with respect to regulation of electricity
and gas distribution. With a ruling as of October 11, 2005,
however, the Italian Constitutional Court rejected
Tuscany’s contention that regulation of electricity and gas
distribution fell within the jurisdiction of regional
governments. Furthermore, the Italian Regions of Tuscany and
Emilia-Romagna introduced regional regulations of the energy
sector, which were challenged by the Italian government before
the Constitutional Court. Depending on the outcome of this case,
we cannot rule out the possibility that in the future
electricity and gas distribution activities might be required to
comply with diverging national and regional regulations.
While the effect of such diverging regulations on our operations
is difficult at this point to predict, it is possible that it
would have a material adverse effect on our financial condition
and results of operations, as it would likely increase our
regulatory compliance costs and create regulatory uncertainty.
Our businesses are subject to numerous environmental
regulations, and we are parties to a significant number of legal
proceedings relating to environmental matters, that could
significantly affect our financial condition and results of
operations
Our businesses are subject to extensive environmental regulation
under Italian law, including laws adopted to implement European
Union regulations and directives and international agreements on
the environment. Environmental regulations affecting our
business primarily relate to air emissions, water pollution,
waste disposal and electromagnetic fields. The principal air
emissions deriving from thermal electricity generation are
sulfur dioxide
(SO2),
nitrogen oxides (NOx), carbon dioxide
(CO2)
and particulate matter such as dust and ash.
We incur significant costs to comply with environmental
regulations requiring us to implement preventive or remedial
measures. Environmental regulations may also influence our
business decisions and strategy, such as by discouraging the use
of certain fuels. In addition, expressions of public concern
about environmental problems associated with electricity
generating plants, power lines and other facilities may result
in even more stringent regulation in the future, which could
further increase costs.
In 2005, we spent a total of
€450 million
on measures intended to reduce the impact of our operations on
the environment, including measures to comply with applicable
law. Of this aggregate amount,
€350 million
was accounted for as current expenditures and
€100 million
as capital expenditures. Major capital expenditures included
projects to reduce
SO2
and NOx emissions by our power plants and to install underground
cables in our distribution network.
In addition, we are parties to a significant number of legal
proceedings relating to environmental matters. The aggregate
amount of damages that we may be required to pay and the
aggregate costs of remediation or preventive measures we may be
required to implement in connection with these proceedings may
be significant.
The adoption of any additional or more rigorous environmental
rules applicable to our businesses would be likely to increase
our costs and could have a negative effect on our financial
condition and results of operations. Please see
“Item 4. Information on the Company —
Regulatory Matters — Environmental Matters” and
“Item 8. Financial Information — Other
Financial Information — Legal Proceedings” for a
more detailed discussion of environmental matters.
We may be unable to exit the telecommunications business
on acceptable terms or in accordance with the currently
envisaged timetable, which would have an adverse effect on our
management’s current business plan
In line with our strategy of focusing on our core energy
operations and exiting the telecommunications business, we sold
Wind to Weather Investments in a series of transactions, the
last one of which was completed in February 2006. As a result of
these transactions, we no longer have direct interest in Wind
and we received aggregate cash consideration of
€3,009 million
and a 26.1% interest in Weather Investments. Weather Investments
is a private consortium headed by Naguib Sawiris, who controls
Orascom, an Egypt-based mobile phone operator that provides
telecommunications services in the Middle East, Africa and
Pakistan, is listed on the London Stock Exchange and the Cairo
and Alexandria Stock Exchange and holds a minority stake in
Hutchinson Telecommunications International.
In addition, we entered into a shareholders’ agreement with
Weather Investments II S.a.r.l., the majority shareholder
of Weather Investments, which contemplates an initial public
offering of Weather Investments, when market conditions are
favorable, and provides for both our and Weather
Investments II S.a.r.l.’s undertakings, subject to
certain exceptions, not to sell our interests in Weather
Investments before the initial public offering. We can give no
assurance that we will be able to complete an offering of
Weather Investments’ shares or otherwise dispose of all or
any part of our interest in Weather Investments on favorable
terms or in accordance with our envisaged timetable and business
strategy, if at all.
Our historical consolidated financial and operating
results may not be indicative of future performance
In 2005, we discontinued the operations of our former
Telecommunications Division and Transmission Division, following
the deconsolidation of Wind and Terna, respectively, as a result
of our disposal of a controlling interest in each of these
companies. We intend to use the proceeds from these sales
primarily to finance our international expansion outside of
Italy through acquisitions. However, should we fail to identify
assets that meet the criteria set forth in our investment
strategy by the end of 2007, we may use part of the available
financial resources to buy back Enel shares in the market.
Moreover, during 2005 and 2006 we also made significant
acquisitions, most notably of SE, as well as entering into
agreements to make other significant acquisitions. Please see
“Item 4. Information on the Company —
History and Development of the Company” for additional
information on these transactions.
We may continue to divest assets as a part of our ongoing
efforts to refocus our activities on our core electricity and
gas businesses, and to acquire new businesses as part of our
international expansion. As a result, our historical
consolidated financial and operational performance during or as
of the end of periods ending on or prior to the consummation of
these transactions may not be indicative of our future operating
and financial performance.
The Italian social security fund is seeking to impose
significant liabilities on us
On May 6, 2005, INPS, the Italian social security fund,
issued a circular purporting to extend an obligation for
employers to make certain social security contributions to
formerly state-owned companies and national public entities
carrying out industrial activities. Although state-owned
companies were exempted from this obligation, INPS indicated in
its circular that this obligation would be applied to privatized
companies with retroactive effect as of the date of
privatization of the relevant entity. As we believe that this
circular should not apply to us, we challenged it before the
Tribunal of Rome. In March 2006, the Council of State, upon
INPS’ request, expressed the opinion that INPS may not
impose retroactive obligations. Though this opinion supports our
position, it is not binding on the Tribunal of Rome and we
cannot exclude that this court will state that the INPS circular
apply to us, whether for the period after its issuance or also
retroactively. In such cases, we estimate that the amounts we
would be required to pay would total to approximately
€80 million
per year.
Legislation enacted in 2005 could increase our local
property tax burden
On May 31, 2005, the Italian parliament passed a law to aid
local governments that included, among other things, provisions
regarding the determination of the deemed value of electricity
generation facilities for purposes of assessing, among others,
local property taxes. Under this law, owners of electric
utilities are required to include in the computation of the
taxable value of their facilities not only land and buildings,
but also the value of removable parts of the facilities, such as
generation equipment.
Should these provisions be applied to all of the electricity
generation facilities that we own and the pending and
prospective litigation regarding the assessment of their deemed
value be unsuccessful, we expect that our local property tax
(the imposta comunale sugli immobili, or ICI) burden would
increase by approximately
€80 million
per year.
In addition, a recent interpretation of these provisions by the
Italian Supreme Court, in a case relating to one of our
facilities, may lead local authorities to claim that they apply
retroactively, starting from the fiscal year 2003. We believe
that these claims would be illegitimate and we would challenge
them before the competent court. However, should these claims be
successful, we estimate that our ICI liability would increase by
approximately up to
€40 million
for each litigated tax period starting from 2003.
We are defendants in a number of legal proceedings
We are defendants in a number of legal proceedings incidental to
the generation and distribution of electricity and our other
business activities. Our pending legal proceedings include
various civil and administrative claims and disputes relating to
the construction and operation of several power stations,
transport and distribution lines, and other matters that arise
in the normal course of our business. We have established a
reserve for litigation and other contingent liabilities where we
consider it probable that a claim will be resolved unfavorably
and where we can reasonably estimate the potential loss
involved. This reserve, which also includes provisions for other
contingencies and uncertainties related to our operations, is
included in other non-current liabilities in our consolidated
balance sheet, and amounted to
€1,146 million
at December 31, 2005, of which
€341 million
related to legal proceedings. Please see “Item 8.
Financial Information — Other Financial
Information — Legal Proceedings.”
However, we are not able to predict the ultimate outcome of any
of the claims against us, and any material damages or other
costs imposed on us in the event of an unfavorable outcome may
be in excess of our existing reserves. We cannot exclude that
unfavorable decisions in proceedings against us could have a
material adverse effect on our financial position or results of
operations.
Risks Relating to Enel’s Ordinary Shares and ADSs
The MEF, Enel’s controlling shareholder, has
significant influence over Enel’s actions
The MEF currently directly owns 21.4% of Enel’s outstanding
share capital and controls Cassa Depositi e Prestiti S.p.A.
(“Cassa Depositi e Prestiti”), which owns 10.2% of
Enel’s outstanding share capital. Therefore, the MEF has
de facto control of Enel. As long as the MEF retains
control of Enel for purposes of applicable Italian law on
controlled companies (which is determined based on having a
majority of the vote at ordinary shareholders’ meetings or
otherwise exercising a dominant influence over another company),
the MEF will be able to exercise significant control over all
matters to be voted on by Enel’s shareholders, including,
without limitation, the election and removal of directors and
possible capital increases or amendments to Enel’s by-laws.
As a result, other shareholders’ ability to influence
decisions on matters submitted to a vote of Enel’s
shareholders may be limited.
The special powers of the Italian government may permit it
to influence Enel’s business, regardless of the level of
its shareholding
The Italian privatization law (as amended) and Enel’s
by-laws confer upon the Italian government, acting through the
MEF (which acts after consultations with and in agreement with
the Ministry of Productive
Activities), certain special powers with respect to Enel’s
business and actions by its shareholders. These powers, which
the MEF confirmed with a decree issued on September 17,2004, may permit the government to influence Enel’s
business, regardless of the level of its shareholding.
In particular, the MEF has the following special powers:
•
The power to oppose the acquisition by persons or entities of an
interest in the Company equal to or in excess of 3% of the
shares with voting rights at the ordinary shareholders’
meetings;
•
The power to oppose certain types of shareholders’
agreements entered into by holders of at least one-twentieth of
the voting capital stock at ordinary shareholders’ meetings;
•
The power to veto any resolution to dissolve, merge or demerge
Enel, transfer a significant part of Enel’s business or
Enel’s registered headquarters outside of Italy, change
Enel’s corporate purpose or eliminate or modify any of the
MEF’s special powers; and
•
The power to directly appoint one non-voting member of
Enel’s board of directors, in addition to the voting
members elected by Enel’s shareholders.
The MEF may exercise these powers only for due cause when it
believes that a concrete detriment to vital national interests
would otherwise result.
The special powers retained by the MEF are described in further
detail under “Item 7. Major Shareholders and Related
Party Transactions — Major Shareholders” and
“Item 10. Additional Information —
By-Laws.” As a result of these powers, Enel may not enter
into change of control transactions without the approval of the
MEF, in agreement with the Ministry of Productive Activities.
This may limit the ability of Enel’s shareholders to
benefit from a premium in connection with a change of control
transaction.
The value of ordinary shares or ADSs may be adversely
affected by sales of substantial amounts of shares by the MEF or
other shareholders or the perception that such sales could
occur
The MEF and/or Cassa Depositi e Prestiti may sell Enel’s
ordinary shares at any time. In October 2004, the MEF sold an
additional interest of approximately 19% in an offering
consisting of a public offering in Italy and a private placement
to international institutional investors that was not registered
under the Securities Act. In July 2005, the MEF sold a further
interest of 9.3% in the Company in a similar offering. There are
no minimum ownership or similar requirements under Italian law
that would limit sales of additional shares by the MEF or Cassa
Depositi e Prestiti.
Sales of substantial amounts of ordinary shares by the MEF or
other shareholders, or the perception that such sales could
occur, could adversely affect the market price of Enel’s
ordinary shares and American Depositary Shares, or ADSs, and
could limit Enel’s ability to raise capital through equity
offerings.
The value, expressed in dollars, of the ordinary shares
and ADSs and of any dividends Enel pays in respect of its
ordinary shares and ADSs will be affected by the euro/dollar
exchange rate
Enel pays cash dividends in euros; as a result, exchange rate
movements may affect the amounts, expressed in
U.S. dollars, that investors receive from JP Morgan Chase
Bank, the depositary for Enel’s ADR program (“JP
Morgan” or the “Depositary”), in respect of such
dividends if they hold ADSs. Moreover, the price of Enel’s
ordinary shares is quoted in euros. Therefore, exchange rate
movements may also affect the U.S. dollar price of the ADSs
corresponding to Enel’s ordinary share price.
It is possible that the price of ordinary shares and ADSs
will experience significant volatility
The market price of Enel’s ordinary shares and ADSs may be
significantly affected by factors such as variations in our
results of operations, market conditions specific to our
industry and changes in regulations applicable to us. In
addition, stock markets can experience significant fluctuations
that may be unrelated to the performance or circumstances of the
specific companies whose shares are affected. Market
fluctuations, as well as economic conditions, may adversely
affect the market price of the ordinary shares and ADSs.
If you hold ADSs rather than ordinary shares it may be
difficult for you to exercise some of your rights as a
shareholder
It may be more difficult for you to exercise your rights as a
shareholder if you hold ADSs than it would be if you directly
held ordinary shares. For example, if Enel offers new shares and
you have the right to subscribe for a portion of them, the
Depositary is allowed, in its own discretion, to sell for your
benefit that right to subscribe for new shares instead of making
it available to you. Furthermore, in some cases, you may not be
able to vote by giving instructions to the Depositary on how to
vote for you.
Forward-Looking Statements
This annual report includes forward-looking statements. When
used in this annual report, the words “seek(s),”“intend(s),”“estimate(s)”,
“plan(s)”, “project(s),”“aim(s),”“expect(s),”“will,”“may,”“believe(s),”“should,”“anticipate(s)” and similar expressions are intended
to identify forward-looking statements. We have based these
forward-looking statements on our current expectations and
projections about future events. These forward-looking
statements regard, among other things:
•
Anticipated trends in our businesses, including trends in demand
for electricity;
•
Changes in the regulatory environment and expectations on how
and when new regulations will be implemented;
•
The remuneration of our generation activities based on
competitive electricity prices rather than tariffs following the
introduction of trading on the Italian power exchange;
•
The impact of changes in electricity and gas tariffs;
•
Our ability to implement our cost reduction program successfully;
•
The possibility that significant volumes of lower-cost
electricity will become available as a result of increased
imports and the construction of new plants in Italy;
•
Our intention to divest our interest in Weather Investment;
•
Our intentions with respect to future dividend payments;
•
Our intention to expand our core businesses, including by
increasing our presence in renewable energy and developing our
gas distribution and sales business;
•
Our intention to expand our operations outside Italy; and
•
Future capital expenditures and investments.
The forward-looking statements included in this annual report
are subject to risks, uncertainties and assumptions about the
Group. Our actual results of operations may differ materially
from the forward-looking statements as a result of, among other
things, the risk factors described under “— Risk
Factors.” We undertake no obligation to publicly update or
revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of
new information, future events or events otherwise occurring
after the date of this annual report. In light of these risks,
uncertainties and assumptions, the forward-looking events
discussed in this annual report might not occur.
Enel was established in December 1962 as a state-owned entity
(Ente Nazionale per l’Energia Elettrica) through the
nationalization of approximately 1,250 private power companies
in Italy. In 1992, Enel ceased to operate as a public entity and
was transformed into a company limited by shares, Enel S.p.A.
Until April 1, 1999, Italy’s electricity market was
highly regulated. On that date, a new law, the Bersani Decree,
came into force, beginning the transformation of the Italian
electricity market into a liberalized market, in which energy
prices charged by generators are freely determined. Beginning in
October 1999, as required by the Bersani Decree, Enel formed
separate subsidiary companies, to each of which Enel assigned
the responsibility (and related assets, liabilities and
personnel) for each of its significant businesses. As a part of
this liberalization, Enel was also required to transfer
responsibility for the management and control of the Italian
national electricity transmission grid and responsibility for
electricity dispatching to the GRTN, a company wholly owned by
the MEF. In addition, as required by Italian legislation adopted
as part of the liberalization of the electricity market, we have
disposed of approximately 15,000 MW of our generating
capacity through the sale of three generation companies and sold
several municipal distribution companies.
In November 1999, the MEF sold approximately 32% of Enel’s
share capital in Enel’s initial public offering, in
connection with which Enel’s ADSs were listed on the New
York Stock Exchange and Enel’s shares were listed on the
Telematico, the Italian screen-based trading market managed by
Borsa Italiana. Following this sale, as part of the
privatization and liberalization of the Italian electricity
market, the MEF sold stakes in Enel of 6.6% in the context of a
private placement transaction in November 2003 and approximately
10% to Cassa Depositi e Prestiti, a company now owned 70% by the
MEF, in December 2003. In October 2004, the MEF sold an
additional interest in Enel of approximately 19% in an offering
consisting of a public offering in Italy and a private placement
to international institutional investors that was not registered
under the Securities Act. Finally, in July 2005, the MEF sold a
further interest of 9.3% in the Company in a similar offering.
Since 2000, we have expanded our operations in the gas sector
through the acquisition of several independent gas distributors.
Since 2000, we have also expanded our energy operations abroad,
including through the purchase in 2002 of Electra de Viesgo S.L.
(“Viesgo”), a company with electricity generation and
distribution operations in Spain, and, in March 2003, of a
controlling interest in Maritza East III Power Company AD
(“Maritza East III”), a company with electricity
generation operations in Bulgaria. We have also acquired power
producers specializing in renewable resources in the Americas
and have a 50% joint venture with Uniņn Fenosa
Generaciņn S.A. in Spain called Enel Uniņn Fenosa
Renovables S.A., or “EUFR”. In April 2006, we acquired
a 66% interest in Slovenske Elektrarne (“SE”) for
total consideration of approximately
€840 million.
SE, the principal electric power generation company in Slovakia,
has a total gross installed capacity of approximately
7,000 MW. In June 2006 we (i) won the auction for a
67.5% stake in the Romanian power distribution company Electrica
Muntenia Sud, a power distributor to more than 1.1 million
customers in Bucharest, Romania, for total consideration of
€820 million,
(ii) acquired from the ESN Group a 49.5% interest in Res
Holding, a Dutch company holding 100% of the Russian power
supplier company RusEnergoSbyt with 11TWh of annual sales, for
$105 million (corresponding to approximately
€88 million),
and (iii) entered into an agreement with Grupo Rede for the
acquisiton of 11 companies that own concessions to operate
hydroelectric plants in Brazil, with an aggregate installed
capacity of 98 MW (closing of the transaction is subject to
certain conditions, including the approval by the Brazilian
electricity authority, and is expected in the second half of
2006).
Until June 2004, we owned 100% of Terna, the principal Italian
electricity transmission company, which currently owns more than
90% of the transmission assets of Italy’s national
electricity grid. In light of Italian laws and regulations
providing for the reunification of the ownership and management
of the Italian transmission grid and imposing certain ownership
restrictions on the entity that will own and manage it, in 2005
and in January 2006 we reduced our stake in Terna, the company
through which we carried out our transmission activities, to
5.12%. For more information please see
“— Business — The Enel
Group — Discontinued Operations-Transmission.”
We have also invested in telecommunications, starting in 1997,
when Enel, France Télécom and Deutsche Telekom
together formed our former telecommunications subsidiary, Wind.
Our initial stake in Wind was 51%, which increased to 73.4%
following Deutsche Telekom’s exit from the joint venture in
July 2000 and our contribution to Wind on July 30, 2001, of
100% of the capital stock of Infostrada, an Italian fixed-line
telephone provider we purchased in 2001 from Vodafone Group plc.
Infostrada was merged into Wind as of January 1, 2002. In
July 2003, we acquired the 26.6% stake in Wind then held by
Wireless Services Belgium SA, a subsidiary of France
Télécom, becoming Wind’s sole shareholder.
In line with our strategy of focusing on our core energy
operations, in May 2005 we entered into an agreement for the
sale of Wind to Weather Investments in a series of transactions.
Weather Investments is a private consortium headed by Naguib
Sawiris, who controls Orascom, an Egypt-based mobile phone
operator that provides telecommunications services in the Middle
East, Africa and Asia and is listed on the London Stock Exchange
and the Cairo and Alexandria Stock Exchange. These transactions
were completed in February 2006. As a result of these
transactions, we received an aggregate cash consideration of
€3,009 million
and a 26.1% interest in Weather Investments.
At the end of 2005, our management decided to re-organize the
Group’s internal structure by substituting our Sales
Infrastructure and Networks Division with two separate divisions
(a Market Division and an Infrastructure and Networks Division)
and by allocating our international generation and distribution
operations, which had previously been included in other
divisions, to a new International Division. This reorganization
is effective as of January 1, and, therefore, our divisions
are currently the following: Generation and Energy Management
Division, Market Division, Infrastructure and Networks Division
and the International Division. Each division is headed by a
senior manager who reports directly to the Chief Executive
Officer of Enel. Moreover, all non-core activities provided by
companies of the Group to all Group companies have been grouped
in our Services and Other Activities sector. Enel, as the parent
company, defines the strategic objectives for the Enel Group and
coordinates the activities of all Group companies. Each of Enel,
our divisions and the Services and Other Activities sector
constitutes a reportable segment.
For additional information on our divisions and their
activities, please see “— Business —
The Enel Group” below. For a detailed discussion of our
operational and financial results in the period 2004-2005,
please see “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and
Prospects.” For a description of our capital expenditures
in each of the last three fiscal years, please see
“— Business — The Enel
Group — Capital Investment Program.”
Enel S.p.A. is a societą per azioni, or a company
whose capital is represented by shares, incorporated under the
laws of Italy. Enel’s statuto, or by-laws, provide
that the duration of the Company is until December 31,
2100. Enel’s registered office is at Viale Regina
Margherita 137, Rome, Italy. Enel’s main telephone number
is +39 06 83051. Individual investors may reach our retail
investor team at telephone number +39 06 8305 2081, while
institutional investors may reach our investor relations team at
telephone number +39 06 8305 7008. Enel is represented in the
United States by our subsidiary Enel North America Inc.
(“Enel North America”), located at One Tech Drive,
Suite 220, Andover, MA01810.
Business
Overview
We are the principal electricity operator in Italy, with the
leading position in the generation, distribution and sale of
electricity. Based on revenues, we were one of the largest
industrial companies in Italy in 2005, with operating revenues
of
€34,059 million,
or approximately $40,333 million. We earned net income in
2005 of
€3,895 million,
or approximately $4,612 million. We believe that, in terms
of the volume of electricity sold in the year 2005, we were one
of the largest electric utilities in Europe, and according to
Bloomberg, as of May 31, 2006, we were also one of the
largest publicly traded electric utilities in the world based on
market capitalization.
The following table shows selected operating data for our
electricity and natural gas operations in Italy for each of the
past three years. Net production equals gross production of
electricity less consumption by units generating electricity and
mechanical and electrical losses in production.
2003
2004
2005
Net installed capacity (GW) in Italy at year end
41.8
42.0
42.2
Net electricity production in Italy (TWh)
137.8
125.9
112.1
Electricity sales to end users in Italy (TWh)(1)
152.2
157.8
148.2
Electricity sales on the regulated market in Italy (TWh)
141.5
137.0
129.7
Electricity sales on the free market in Italy (TWh)
10.7
20.8
18.5
Total electricity distributed in Italy (TWh)(2)
265.0
261.2
259.3
Natural gas sales to end users in Italy (billions of cubic
meters)
4.4
5.2
5.1
Natural gas sales customers in Italy at year end (millions)
1.8
2.0
2.1
(1)
Excluding sales to resellers.
(2)
Including electricity distributed to resellers.
In 2005, our operations were organized, reflecting our internal
structure, into six business segments: Generation and Energy
Management; Sales, Infrastructure and Networks; Transmission;
Telecommunications; Services and Other Activities; and Corporate.
At the end of 2005, our management decided to re-organize the
Group’s internal structure by substituting our Sales,
Infrastructure and Networks Division with two separate divisions
(a Market Division and an Infrastructure and Networks Division)
and by allocating our international generation and distribution
operations, which had previously been included in other
divisions, to a new International Division. Our divisions are
currently the following: Generation and Energy Management
Division, Market Division, Infrastructure and Networks Division
and the International Division. Each division is headed by a
senior manager who reports directly to the Chief Executive
Officer of Enel. Moreover, all non-core activities provided by
companies of the Group to all Group companies have been grouped
in our Services and Other Activities sector. Enel, as the parent
company, defines the strategic objectives for the Enel Group and
coordinates the activities of all Group companies. Each of Enel,
our divisions and the Services and Activities sector constitutes
a reportable segment. However, our reorganization is effective
as of January 1, 2006 and, therefore, the following
description reflects the structure that we had in 2005 with our
former Transmission and Telecommunications segments each being
treated as discontinued operations following the deconsolidation
of Terna and Wind.
Generation and Energy Management. Our Generation and
Energy Management Division is responsible for our operations
related to the production of electricity and the procurement and
trading of fuel for electricity generation, and until the end of
2005 also included our power generation activities in Italy and
abroad. Effective as of January 1, 2006, its international
operations were allocated to our new International Division.
We are the largest producer of electricity in Italy. At
December 31, 2005, we had net installed capacity in Italy
of approximately 42.2 GW, which, based on data provided by
Terna, we estimate to have been approximately 49% of total
Italian net installed capacity at that date. Our net electricity
production in Italy in 2005 was 112.1 TWh, and, based on data
provided by Terna, we estimate that our production represented
approximately 39% of Italian net production during 2005. Our net
production declined by 10.9%, or 13.8 TWh, in 2005 as compared
to 2004. As of December 31, 2005, we had 599 generating
plants in Italy, consisting of thermal, hydroelectric,
geothermal and other renewable resources facilities. In 2005,
73.0% of our net production was from thermal plants, 22.2% was
from hydroelectric plants and the remaining 4.8% was from
geothermal and other renewable resources plants. We do not own
or operate any nuclear plants in Italy.
At December 31, 2005, we also had electricity generation
plants outside Italy with aggregate net installed capacity of
approximately 3.786 GW, including facilities in Spain, Bulgaria
and North, Central and South America. In addition we manage a
generation plant in Russia, and in April 2006 we acquired
generation operations in Slovakia with our purchase of SE.
Effective as of January 1, 2006 our international
generation operations are carried out by our new International
Division.
In 2005, the Generation and Energy Management Division had
revenues after intrasegment eliminations of
€14,215 million,
reflecting revenues prior to intrasegment eliminations of
€13,376 million
in Italy and
€914 million
abroad. This compares to revenues after intrasegment
eliminations of
€13,028 million
in 2004, reflecting revenues prior to intrasegment eliminations
of
€12,446 million
in Italy and
€622 million
abroad.
Sales, Infrastructure and Networks. Until the end of 2005
our Sales, Infrastructure and Networks Division operated in both
the electricity and gas markets through two
sub-divisions — a sales sub-division and an
infrastructure and networks sub-division — responsible
respectively for sales of products and services and for
management of our distribution network. Effective as of
January 1, 2006, these two sub-divisions became two
independent divisions, the Market Division and Infrastructure
and Networks Division, that replaced the Sales, Infrastructure
and Networks Division. In addition, effective on the same date,
international operations previously carried out by the Sales,
Infrastructure and Networks Division were allocated to our new
International Division.
We are the largest electricity distributor in Italy,
distributing a total of 259.3 TWh of electricity in 2005. At
December 31, 2005, our Italian distribution network
consisted of a total of 1,090,129 kilometer of lines, mostly
medium and low voltage, and 413,429 primary and secondary
transformer substations, with a total transformer capacity of
157,037 MVA.
We are also the largest supplier of electricity in Italy. The
market for electricity sales in Italy is divided into a
regulated market and a free market. Customers in the regulated
market must purchase electricity from their local distributor;
customers in the free market may choose from whom to purchase
their electricity. In 2005, we sold electricity to approximately
23.4 million residential customers, which we estimate were
86.7% of all residential customers in Italy. In 2005, we
distributed and sold approximately 129.7 TWh of electricity on
the regulated market, and distributed approximately 121.4 TWh of
electricity and sold approximately 18.5 TWh of electricity on
the free market (including sales to final customers by Enel
Trade S.p.A. (“Enel Trade”), of our Generation and
Energy Management Division).
We are also active in the import, distribution and sale of
natural gas. In 2005, we sold approximately 6.7 billion
cubic meters of natural gas to third parties, of which
approximately 5.1 billion cubic meters were sold to nearly
2.1 million end users.
We also have electricity sales and distribution activities in
Spain, and on April 28, 2005, we acquired a 51% interest in
two electricity distribution and sales companies in Romania. In
2005 we distributed 9.7 TWh and sold 8.1 TWh. Since
January 1, 2006, our international sales and distribution
operations are carried out by our new International Division.
In 2005, the Sales, Infrastructure and Networks Division had
revenues after intrasegment eliminations of
€20,422 million,
reflecting revenues prior to intrasegment eliminations of
€17,905 million
from our Italian electricity sales and distribution operations,
€913 million
from international electricity sales and distribution
operations, and
€1,602 million
from natural gas sales and distribution in Italy. In 2004, the
Sales, Infrastructure and Networks Division had revenues of
€19,254 million
after intrasegment eliminations, reflecting revenues of
€17,474 million
from our Italian electricity sales and distribution operations,
€391 million
from international electricity sales and distribution operations
and
€1,396 million
from natural gas sales and distribution in Italy.
Corporate. Enel S.p.A., as the parent company, defines
the strategic objectives for the Enel Group and coordinates the
activities of all Group companies. In addition, Enel manages
finance operations and insurance risk coverage for all Group
companies and provides assistance and guidelines on
organizational, human resources, industrial relations,
accounting, administrative, tax, corporate and legal issues.
Moreover, Enel S.p.A. is the party
that enters into the Group’s long-term electricity
contracts. In 2005, Enel S.p.A. had revenues of
€1,103 million,
compared to
€1,649 million
in 2004. Accordingly, we consider Enel as a separate reportable
segment.
Services and Other Activities. Our Services and Other
Activities sector provides several services to all Group
companies including real estate, engineering and construction,
information technology, personnel training and administration,
factoring and insurance services. After the re-organization of
our internal structure at the end of 2005, we no longer consider
this sector as a separate division in light of its focus on
providing support to all Group companies following our
divestitures of certain non-core operations in 2004 and 2005
that previously formed part of this division. These divestitures
included the sale in July 2004 of real estate firm NewReal
S.p.A. (“NewReal”), to which we had contributed real
estate assets having a market value of approximately
€1,400 million,
and the sale in May 2005 of most of our interest in water
operations through the sale of our wholly-owned subsidiary
Enel.Hydro and of our 20% interest in Idrosicilia S.p.A., thus
reducing our stake in this company to 40%. In 2005, our Services
and Other Activities sector had revenues of
€1,660 million,
compared to
€1,794 million
in 2004. Effective January 1, 2006, our EPC activities
related to companies of our Generation and Energy Management
Division, which were previously included in this sector, were
transferred to our Generation and Energy Management Division.
Discontinued Operations. Consistent with our objective of
focusing on our core energy businesses, we reduced our presence
in the telecommunications business through the transfer in 2005
and 2006 of the entire share capital of Wind to Weather
Investments, a company in which we currently have a 26.1%
interest. For more information please see
“— Business — The Enel
Group — Discontinued Operations —
Telecommunications.”
Moreover, in light of Italian laws and regulations providing for
the reunification of the ownership and management of the Italian
transmission grid and imposing certain ownership restrictions on
the entity that will own and manage it, in 2005 and in January
2006 we reduced our stake in Terna, the company through which we
carried out our transmission activities, to 5.12%. For more
information please see “— Business —
The Enel Group — Discontinued Operations —
Transmission.”
As a result of these divestitures, we deconsolidated Wind as of
August 11, 2005, and Terna as of September 15, 2005,
and no longer have a Telecommunications division and a
Transmission division.
The following chart sets forth our principal business units and
the main companies through which we conduct these businesses as
of May 31, 2006, as well as the country in which each such
company is incorporated. All subsidiaries in the chart are
directly or indirectly wholly owned by Enel, unless otherwise
indicated.
Strategy
In recent years, we have streamlined our operations to focus on
our core electricity and natural gas businesses, including
through the divestment of a number of non-core activities. We
aim to become one of the largest European electricity and gas
suppliers by 2010, with the goal of creating value for
Enel’s shareholders,
satisfying our customers and developing our employees. We have
the following short and medium-term strategic objectives:
•
Reducing our Italian power generation costs to levels lower than
those of our competitors, in particular through the conversion
of certain generation plants to run on less expensive fuels, and
the alignment of our other operating costs with international
best practice through an integrated approach to quality and
standards;
•
Increasing our presence in the market for electricity generated
from renewable resources;
•
Increasing electricity sales volumes and the number of customers
in the free market in order to maximize our production margin by
matching production volumes and sales volumes;
•
Consolidating our position in the natural gas distribution
business in Italy, where we are the second-largest operator;
•
Extracting value from the integrated management of our
electricity and natural gas services in Italy;
•
Meeting our operating efficiency targets in the distribution and
sale of electricity and natural gas; and
•
Expanding our operations outside Italy, particularly in
countries where we are already present or where market
liberalization and privatization efforts are in progress, in
which we can capitalize on the experience and technical know-how
we have acquired in the Italian market.
Consistent with our objective of focusing on our core energy
businesses, we view our 26.1% interest in Weather Investments
(to which we sold Wind) solely as a financial investment. We
intend to focus our non-core activities on providing competitive
services to the Group.
In addition to the interim dividend of
€0.19 per
share paid in November 2005, on June 22, 2006 Enel paid its
shareholders a balance dividend of
€0.44 per
share with respect to its 2005 results. With respect to its 2006
results, Enel expects to pay its shareholders an aggregate
dividend of at least
€0.42 per
share, part as an interim dividend in 2006 and part as balance
dividend in 2007. Please see “Item 8. Financial
Information — Other Financial Information —
Dividend Policy.”
In order to pursue the Group’s objectives, each of our
divisions has its own set of specific strategies, as described
below.
Generation and Energy Management
As a result of the progressive liberalization of the Italian
electricity market and the required sale of a portion of our
generation capacity, we estimate that our share of the power
generation market in Italy has declined from approximately 63%
in 1999 to approximately 39% in 2005.
In order to maintain profitability and provide services on
competitive terms in Italy, our Generation and Energy Management
Division seeks to be the lowest-cost generator of electricity,
in particular by diversifying appropriately its use of fuels. In
this respect, we have reduced the percentage of our total
production that we generate through plants fueled by oil and
natural gas (excluding natural gas-fueled plants using CCGT
technology) from approximately 45% in 2002 to approximately 26%
in 2005. At the same time, we have increased the percentage of
electricity we generate through thermal plants fired by coal and
orimulsion from approximately 22% in 2002 to approximately 27%
in 2005 and our production using renewable resources from
approximately 24% in 2002 to approximately 27% in 2005. We do
not currently generate any electricity using orimulsion. Our aim
is for approximately 30% of our overall electricity output to be
generated using renewable resources.
In order to implement its strategy, our Generation and Energy
Management Division intends to:
•
Continue its program to convert certain of our thermal
generation plants to CCGT plants capable of generating
approximately 5,000 MW. Much of this program has already
been completed;
Upgrade additional plants to run on lower-cost fuels, such as
coal, while still respecting environmental norms;
•
Consolidate its position in the field of renewable energy,
including through an investment program expected to total
approximately
€1.3 billion
from 2006 through 2010. This program includes plans for the
maintenance, refurbishment and construction of wind,
hydroelectric and geothermal generation plants in Italy that we
expect will result in 300 MW of additional net installed
capacity;
•
Reduce
CO2
emissions through our integrated investment strategy, which
contemplates the conversion of old oil-fired plants into CCGT
and high efficiency coal plants and the enhancement of our
renewable generation capacity, as well as sourcing
CO2
credits by participating in the Clean Development Mechanism and
Joint Implementation Projects (emission reduction projects under
the terms of the Kyoto Protocol);
•
Continually seek to achieve operating excellence while
increasing the efficiency and availability of its plants and
respecting the environment and the health and safety of its
employees;
•
Continue its efforts to reduce its operating and maintenance
expenses until it attains international best practice
levels; and
•
Optimize its fuel procurement activities, through a
diversification of suppliers and supply channels.
Infrastructure and Networks
We currently transport more than 80% of the electricity
transported in Italy on our distribution network. In our
electricity distribution operations, we are seeking to face the
challenges of market liberalization and changes in applicable
tariff regimes by taking action to reduce costs, and in
particular our cash cost per customer of distributing
electricity, as well as by continuing to focus on the quality of
service we provide. In particular, we intend to:
•
Continue our program to reduce operating costs and optimize our
investment expenditures, by seeking constantly to improve our
administrative processes, increasing our use of technology to
support our activities and evaluating our investments more
strictly from a financial perspective;
•
Continue to improve our performance with respect to the targets
set by the Energy Authority for quality and continuity of
service in those geographic areas where these targets have not
yet been achieved, and maintaining the quality and continuity of
service where they have been achieved or exceeded; and
•
Complete the roll-out of our “Telemanagement” digital
metering program in Italy by the end of 2006, in order to
(i) reduce costs associated with physical measurement of
consumption and on-site
maintenance of meters by our personnel, as these tasks would be
accomplished remotely; (ii) measure the electricity
consumption of our customers more accurately; (iii) improve
our response times in providing technical assistance to our
customers and provide higher quality service; and
(iv) offer our customers tailored tariff plans that promote
the use of electricity in off-peak periods and provide customers
with opportunities to save money. We entered into an agreement
with IBM in March 2004 to commercialize our digital metering
know-how for use by other utilities in Italy and abroad in an
effort to further benefit from this program. At March 31,2006, we had installed approximately 27.6 million digital
meters, of which approximately 25.5 million were connected
to our remote network.
In our natural gas distribution business, our primary objective
is to operate as efficiently as possible and consolidate our
market position, through both bidding on new gas distribution
concessions and, where appropriate, acquiring additional gas
distribution companies, particularly where there are
opportunities for significant synergies with our existing
operations. By controlling costs and increasing our customer
base, we expect to further reduce our distribution cash cost per
customer.
As a result of the liberalization process, based on data from
Terna and from the GRTN (for the years before 2005), we have
seen our market share in direct sales of electricity to end
users in Italy decline from approximately 92% in 1999 to
approximately 50% in 2005.
Our strategy to counter the effects of this trend is to continue
to improve our quality of service and our cost-containment
policies, further focus on small business clients and leverage
our brand to target customers who elect to participate in the
free market.
In our natural gas sales business, we intend to increase our
market share and margins by selectively expanding our customer
base and increasing the volume of natural gas we sell. We seek
to increase our customer base and to retain customers who elect
to participate in the free market through initiatives targeting
residential and medium-size businesses, including “dual
fuel” offers (providing electricity and gas service through
one sales network, with one customer service department and one
bill) and offers tailored to customers. In addition, our goal is
to lower the costs we incur in serving our customers.
International Operations
Consistent with our objective to become one of the largest
electricity companies in Europe and expand our operations
outside Italy, we are focusing our efforts in European markets
in which we are already present (such as Spain, Slovakia,
Romania and the Americas) as well as considering opportunities
that may arise in other markets (such as France and other
Central and Eastern Europe markets).
Consistent with our strategy of international expansion, we may
make acquisitions of targets of very significant size. Without
making any commitments, certain banks have expressed an
intention to provide us with the financing necessary for such
acquisitions.
In particular, our strategy in markets where we already have a
presence is the following:
Spain. The Spanish electricity market is particularly
important for us, since the demand for electricity in Spain is
expected to grow at a higher rate than in other European
markets, and we are already present in Spain through our Spanish
subsidiaries Enel Viesgo Generaciņn (electricity
generation), Electra de Viesgo Distribuciņn (electricity
distribution) and our affiliate EUFR (electricity generation
from renewable resources). We intend to develop our ability to
generate electricity from renewable resources and convert
certain coal and gas/oil-fired units into CCGT and more
environmentally friendly plants. Moreover, by 2009 we intend to
implement a Telemanagement digital meter system in Spain similar
to the system we are completing in Italy. Please see
“— Sales, Infrastructure and Networks —
Domestic Distribution and Sales Operations —
Telemanagement Systems” for a description of our
Telemanagement digital meter system in Italy. We expect to
invest approximately
€2,044 million
in our Spanish operations from 2006 through 2010.
Romania. We are interested in the Romanian electricity
market, particularly in light of Romania’s scheduled
accession to the EU in 2007. We are already present in Romania
through Enel Electrica Banat (formerly Electrica Banat), and
Enel Electrica Dobrogea (formerly Electrica Dobrogea), two
distribution companies in which we acquired a 51% stake in 2005,
and where we are introducing management know-how and standards
that are in line with Western European best practices. Moreover,
in June 2006 we won the auction for a 67.5% stake in the
Romanian power distribution company Electrica Muntenia Sud. Upon
the successful completion of this transaction, we expect to
serve approximately 2.5 million customers in Romania,
including customers from Enel Electrica Banat and Enel Electrica
Dobrogea. We also intend to enter the Romanian generation
business, once it is privatized.
Slovakia. We are interested in the Slovakian electricity
market due to its strong interconnection with other Central
European markets. We already have a strong presence in the
Slovakian electricity market through SE, and we will monitor
further opportunities that may arise. We also plan to upgrade
SE’s existing nuclear plants and to invest in renewable
resources. We are currently committed to develop two additional
nuclear units for SE by 2013. Finally, in April 2006 we
submitted a binding offer for the acquisition of a
90% interest in Paroplinovy Cyklus Bratislava, a Slovakian
electricity generation company with an installed capacity of
220 MW. We do not expect the outcome of this offer to be
known before August 2006.
Northern and Latin America. We are present in North
America and Central and South America through Enel North America
and Enel Latin America, respectively. We intend to grow our
operations in these regions, particularly in the renewable
resources market through the acquisitions and development of
hydroelectric, wind and geothermal generation plants in North
America and in Central and South America.
The Enel Group
Italian Electricity Demand
Demand for electricity in Italy has grown at an average annual
rate of approximately 2.0% during the past five years. The
following table shows the annual rate of growth in Italy’s
GDP in real terms and the annual rate of growth in electricity
demand for the years indicated.
Average Annual
Growth Rate
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2001-2005
Growth in real GDP(1)
1.8
%
0.4
%
0.3
%
1.2
%
0.0
%
0.74
%
Growth in electricity demand(2)
2.1
%
1.9
%
3.2
%
1.5
%
1.3
%
2.0
%
Sources:
(1)
National Institute of Statistics (Istituto Nazionale di
Statistica).
(2)
Terna (data for the years before 2005 were provided by the
GRTN). Data for 2005 are provisional.
Electricity demand grew by 1.3% in 2005, after having grown by
1.5% in 2004 and by 3.2% in 2003. Growth in demand for
electricity is determined by a variety of factors, including the
rate of economic growth, the level of business activity and
weather conditions. In 2005, growth in demand for electricity
slowed compared to that in 2004, reflecting the lower demand
from small and medium-sized businesses. Please see
“Domestic Distribution and Sales Operations —
Sales, Infrastructure and Networks — Sales to
Regulated Electricity Market.” According to data published
in June 2006 by the Italian National Institute of Statistics,
Italian GDP contracted by 0.6% in the first quarter of 2006 as
compared to the fourth quarter of 2005, and increased by 1.5% as
compared to the first quarter of 2005.
Per capita electricity consumption is lower in Italy than in a
number of other leading industrialized countries. On the basis
of the data from the GRTN for 2004, the most recent available,
we calculate that in 2004, electricity consumption in Italy was
approximately 5,236 kWh per capita, compared to 5,208 kWh in
2003. As differences in the industrial or commercial and service
sectors among countries not related to individual electricity
use can distort comparisons of overall per capita production, we
prefer to use per capita residential electricity use as our
basic comparative measure. The following table compares per
capita residential electricity consumption in Italy with that of
other countries in the European Union for 2003, the most recent
year for which complete data is available.
Per Capita
Residential
Residential
Inhabitants
Consumption
Consumption
(In millions)
(TWh)
(KWh/inhabitant)
France
59.8
141.0
2,358
United Kingdom
59.4
117.2
1,973
Germany
82.6
135.7
1,643
Spain
41.1
53.7
1,307
Italy
57.7
63.7
1,104
European Union
380.2
685.3
1,803
Source: Enel, based on data established by Enerdata —
World Energy database — February 2005.
We believe that a reason per capita residential electricity
consumption is lower in Italy than in the other countries of the
European Union indicated in the table above is that in the past
the tariff structure established by
government regulation in Italy discouraged high-volume
residential use. Please see “— Regulatory
Matters — Electricity Regulation — The
Tariff Structure” for a discussion of the current tariff
structure.
Generation and Energy Management
We are the largest producer of electricity in Italy through our
Generation and Energy Management Division. Our key subsidiaries
in this division include Enel Produzione, the division’s
lead company and our primary generating company, and Enel Trade,
which purchases fuel for all of our generating operations, sells
electricity to resellers and wholesalers, sells natural gas to
gas distribution companies and is active in the fuel trading
sector. Moreover, in 2004 and 2005 this division was also
responsible for sales of electricity to customers with annual
consumption higher than 100 GWh (which sales are carried out by
our Market Division since April 2006). Since January 1,2006, the international generation operations previously carried
out by this division have been allocated to our new
International Division.
Enel Trade also carries out commodity risk management activities
on behalf of all Group companies. Please see “Item 11.
Quantitative and Qualitative Information Disclosure about Market
Risk” for additional information on our hedging activities.
We also carry out emission trading through Enel Trade.
Until May 31, 2005, our Generation and Energy Management
Division also included Enel Green Power, which specialized in
producing electricity from renewable resources, Enel Logistica
Combustibili S.r.l., active in the fuel logistics sector, and
Conphoebus S.r.l., which provided renewable energy-related
services. We merged these companies into Enel Produzione as of
June 1, 2005, uniting these electricity generation-related
companies into a single entity as part of our efforts to
streamline and simplify the division’s operations.
This division also carries out research and development
activities, in order to provide technological innovations to our
businesses. The objective of our research and development
activity is to improve the efficiency and capacity of our core
energy operations, to expand and make more innovative the
services they offer and to reduce the environmental impact of
our operations. We develop new products and processes internally
and also acquire technology in the market, which we then
customize for our own purposes.
In particular, our research and development activities seek to
improve the efficiency of our generation plants and distribution
networks, to minimize the environmental impact of electricity
generation and to develop alternative fuels and innovative
technologies, including projects to develop hydrogen and high
temperature solar technologies.
We carried out research and development activities mainly
through Enel Produzione in 2005. Our expenditures on research
and development were approximately
€20 million
in 2005, in line with those in 2004.
Moreover, as of January 2006, this division has assumed charge
of the EPC activities related to the companies of the Group,
which were previously carried out by our Service and Other
Activities Division.
Unless otherwise specified, all operating data furnished in this
section excludes data from our generating companies located
outside of Italy.
Domestic Generation
Generating Facilities
At December 31, 2005, Enel Produzione operated a total of
599 generating plants. Our Italian generating facilities include
thermal plants (which burn fossil fuels), hydroelectric plants,
geothermal plants and other facilities that generate electricity
from renewable resources. At December 31, 2005, these
plants had a total net installed capacity of 42.2 GW,
representing approximately 49% of the total net installed
capacity in Italy. Our net electricity production in 2005
decreased by 10.9% to 112.1 TWh from 125.9 TWh in 2004.
We estimate that our net electricity production in 2005
represented approximately 39% of Italian production during the
year, compared to 43% in 2004.
The following table shows the gross production in 2003, 2004 and
2005 for the Italian electricity sector as a whole in gigawatt
hours, broken down by type of generating plant. Net production
is the difference between gross
production less consumption by units generating electricity and
mechanical and electrical losses in production, referred to as
“power used by auxiliary installations.” Imports
include electricity purchased from foreign producers on the spot
market or under annual or long-term contracts. Pumped storage
consumption refers to the use of electricity by pumped storage
hydroelectric plants to pump water to elevated areas for use at
a later time to generate electricity.
2003
2004
2005*
(In GWh)
(In GWh)
(In GWh)
Gross production:
Thermal
242,784
246,125
252,412
Hydroelectric
44,277
49,908
42,482
Geothermal and other renewable
6,804
7,288
7,465
Total gross production in Italy
293,865
303,321
302,359
Power used by auxiliary installations
(13,682
)
(13,299
)
(12,704
)
Total net production in Italy
280,183
290,022
289,655
Net electricity imports
50,968
45,635
49,155
Total pumped storage consumption
(10,492
)
(10,300
)
(9,369
)
Total electricity demand in Italy
320,659
325,357
329,441
Source: Terna (data for the years before 2005 were provided by
the GRTN).
*
Data for 2005 are provisional.
Please see “— Competition in the Electricity and
Gas Markets” for a more detailed discussion of the
electricity markets in Italy.
The following table shows certain statistics about our domestic
generating facilities, broken down by type of plant, at
December 31, 2005, and for the year 2005. The weighted
average age of the plants does not take into account
refurbishments or upgrades after initial construction, but does
reflect the effects of the refurbishing of geothermal plants,
the conversion of thermal plants into CCGT plants and the
conversion of one coal unit to clean coal technology that we
completed in 2005. The forced outage factor represents the
amount of electricity that was not produced during the period
because of unplanned outages, expressed as a percentage of the
maximum theoretical amount of electricity that could have been
produced during the period.
We have no plans to construct new plants or add significant
amounts of generating capacity in Italy, other than from
renewable resources, in the near term. Instead, we have focused
our investment plans on our existing generating plants. Please
see “— Capital Investment Program —
Generation and Energy Management” for a more detailed
discussion of these plans.
Thermal Production
In Italy, at December 31, 2005, we owned 46 thermal plants
with an aggregate net installed capacity of 26.9 GW, or 63.7% of
our net installed capacity at that date. Our thermal net
production was 81,823 GWh in 2005, as compared to 91,854 GWh in
2004, representing in each year 73.0% of our net production for
that year.
All our thermal plants consist of two or more generating units
and most have a standardized design, with the generating units
being of one of three types: steam-condensing units, gas turbine
units and internal combustion units. Steam-condensing units
consist of closed-cycle plants in which water is transformed
into steam and used in a turbine to generate electricity. Steam
is turned back into water through a cooling process using sea or
river water or air tower cooling. Gas-turbine units burn natural
gas and diesel fuel to drive a turbine and generate electricity.
Internal combustion units use diesel engines to generate
electricity. In addition to these conventional thermal plants,
we own plants with CCGT gas turbines. At December 31, 2005,
we derived approximately 68% of the net installed capacity of
our thermal plants from steam-condensing units, approximately 6%
from gas-turbine units in repowered steam plants, approximately
8% from gas-turbine units in open cycle, and approximately 18%
from CCGT units. Internal combustion units represented a minimal
part of our thermal gross installed capacity.
Each of our conventional thermal generating units is designed to
operate using one or more kinds of fuel. Single fuel units use
either natural gas, petroleum products or coal, while dual fuel
units can use petroleum products and either natural gas or coal,
while triple fuel units can use petroleum products, coal and
natural gas. In 2005, single fuel units generated approximately
51% of our net production from thermal plants (compared to
approximately 55% in 2004) and represented approximately 69% of
the net installed capacity of these plants at year end. Dual
fuel units accounted for approximately 49% of our net production
from thermal plants (compared to approximately 45% in 2004) and
approximately 31% of our net installed capacity of these plants
at December 31, 2005. The average thermal efficiency, or
the ratio of useful energy produced to the energy consumed to
produce it, of our thermal plants was 38.8% at December 31,2005, slightly decreasing from 39.1% in 2004.
In 1997, we began converting a number of our conventional
thermal plants into CCGT plants, generally by installing one or
more gas turbines and replacing conventional boilers with heat
recovery steam boilers used to drive existing steam turbines.
Converting plants to CCGT increases efficiency and reduces
emissions. We plan for our new CCGT plants to have an expected
average thermal efficiency of approximately 56%, in line with
that at our existing CCGT plants.
Since 1997, we have completed the conversion of approximately
4,300 MW of generating capacity to CCGT, and we expect to
convert additional capacity of approximately 750 MW by the
end of 2007. We currently estimate the average costs of
conversion over the course of the project to be approximately
€350,000 per
MW of net installed capacity, or a total of approximately
€1,800 million
through 2008. At December 31, 2005, we had spent
approximately
€1,600 million
of this total.
In addition to our CCGT conversion program, we are planning to
upgrade additional net installed capacity of approximately
4,100 MW by:
•
completing the upgrading of the coal-burning technology of our
existing coal plant, Sulcis, which we expect to become
operational in the second half of 2006 (accouting for
approximately 300 MW);
•
converting three units at our fuel-oil plant at Torrevaldaliga
Nord to clean coal technology, a process which is in progress
and which we expect complete between 2008 and 2009 (accounting
for approximately 1,900 MW); and
•
subject to receipt of required permits, converting another three
units to clean coal technology (accounting for approximately
1,900 MW). Depending on whether and when we obtain the
required permits, we estimate that the converted facilities
would be operational by 2010 or 2011.
We have made significant investments since 1990 to improve the
environmental standards of our thermal plants and to comply with
the emission thresholds established by applicable environmental
laws and regulations. These measures have included installing
desulphurization and denitrogenation units and upgrading burners
and units for the treatment of waste water and ash resulting
from the electricity generation process. Installation of
desulphurization and denitrogenation units increases our
flexibility to use different types of fuel, including lower-cost
fuels such as high sulfur fuel oil, while maintaining compliance
with emission restrictions.
Our environmental capital expenditures for conventional thermal
generation in 2005 were in line with those in 2004 and amounted
to approximately
€35 million.
Please see “— Regulatory Matters —
Environmental Matters” for a discussion of the
environmental laws and regulations affecting our generation
operations.
Hydroelectric Production
At December 31, 2005, we had 500 hydroelectric plants in
Italy with an aggregate net installed capacity of 14.4 GW, or
approximately 34% of our net installed capacity at that date. In
2005, our hydroelectric net production was 24,883 GWh, or 22.2%
of our net production for the year.
We classify our hydroelectric plants with reservoirs by fill-in
rate, which represents the time required for a plant’s
reservoir to fill from empty based on normal water flow. Pondage
plants have fill-in rates ranging from two to 400 hours and
reservoir plants have fill-in rates exceeding 400 hours. We
also have run-of-river
and pumped storage hydroelectric plants.
In 2005, pondage plants generated 24.5% of our net hydroelectric
production and represented 19.7% of our net installed
hydroelectric generation capacity at year end, while
run-of-river plants
accounted for 24.6% of our net production from hydroelectric
plants and 11.5% of our net installed hydroelectric generating
capacity. Pumped storage (including mixed pumped storage) plants
generated 27.1% of our net hydroelectric production in 2005, and
represented 52.1% of our net installed hydroelectric generating
capacity, with reservoir plants accounting for the remaining
approximate 23.8% of our net hydroelectric production and 16.7%
of our net installed hydroelectric capacity in the same period.
We invested
€178 million
in 2005 on our hydroelectric plants, including on work carried
out to comply with safety and environmental regulations, as well
as on refurbishment and revamping. Our hydroelectric plants
generate electricity from water streams in the public domain
under licenses from the Italian government. Under the Bersani
Decree, the Provincial Authorities of Trento and Bolzano, which
enjoy special autonomous status under Italian law, were entitled
to impose earlier license termination dates for hydroelectric
plants in these areas. If any of these licenses expire without
being renewed, we will have to transfer the affected
hydroelectric plants (with an aggregate net installed capacity
of 1,975 MW, or 4.7% of our current total net installed
capacity) to the governmental authority granting the license.
The Provincial Authorities of Trento and Bolzano set a
termination date of 2010 for the licenses they have granted. The
licenses from the Italian goverment were originally due to
expire in 2029 and were subject to renewal.
In January 2004, however, the European Commission determined
that certain Italian regulations regarding hydroelectric
concessions were contrary to EU law. In particular, the European
Commission objected to renewal preferences granted to existing
holders of concessions (and in the region of Trentino-Alto
Adige, to the operator controlled by the local authorities) upon
the expiry of those concessions, as well as to the fact that the
regulations provided for the expiration of all concessions in
2029 (and for the region of Trentino-Alto Adige, in 2010), even
though these concessions had previously been of perpetual
duration. In December 2005, Italy amended the relevant
regulations, abrogating the renewal preferences and postponing
the expiration of all concessions for an additional
10 years. However, if the European Commission continues to
pursue its formal action before the Court of Justice to enforce
its request and the Court of Justice affirms the European
Commission’s opinion, our hydroelectric concessions may be
terminated prematurely and we may not be able to renew these
concessions on favorable terms or at all. The European
Commission decision on whether to continue its formal action is
expected in the second half of 2006. Please see
“Item 3. Key Information — Risk
Factors — Risks Related to Our Energy
Businesses — A European Commission challenge to
Italian regulations on hydroelectric concessions could adversely
affect our business, financial condition and results of
operations.”
Production from Geothermal and Other Renewable Resources
We produce energy from renewable resources, and have both
significant experience in multiple technologies, including
geothermal, wind and solar energy, as well as our own
engineering and project development capabilities. We formerly
conducted these activities through Enel Green Power, which we
merged into Enel Produzione as of June 1, 2005.
At December 31, 2005, we had 32 geothermal power plants
with an aggregate net installed capacity of 671 MW. In
2005, our geothermal net production was 5,012 GWh, or 4.5% of
our net production for the year.
We also generate electricity from other forms of renewable
resources, including solar photovoltaic systems and wind energy.
At December 31, 2005, we operated 17 wind farms with an
aggregate net installed capacity of about 277 MW and four
photovoltaic solar grid connected power plants with an aggregate
net installed capacity of 3 MW. Together, these plants
accounted for 369 GWh of our net production in 2005.
Most of our revenues from renewable energy come from sale
agreements entered into under the CIP 6 regime, which provides
incentives for the production of renewable energy, and from
sales of energy produced by small hydroelectric plants,
including sales on the free market through Enel Trade. We expect
that the demand for energy produced from renewable resources to
increase as a result of current regulations requiring producers
to supply a specified amount of electricity generated from
qualifying renewable resources. Please see
“— Regulatory Matters — Electricity
Regulation — Promotion of Renewable Resources”
for additional information.
To comply with these regulatory requirements, we can either
produce electricity from qualified renewable resources
ourselves, which would entitle us to receive “green
certificates”, or we can purchase “green
certificates” from other qualified producers or the GRTN.
Based on our production for 2004, we were required to provide
approximately 2.1 TWh of electricity from qualified renewable
resources in 2005, the same amount we were required to provide
in 2004. In 2005, we generated 1.3 TWh of energy from qualified
renewable resources and purchased “green certificates”
for the remaining 0.8 TWh, at a cost of approximately
€90 million.
We estimate that in 2006 we will increase our generation from
qualified renewable resources significantly, thus reducing the
amount of green certificates we have to purchase from other
qualified producers or from the GRTN in order to comply with the
regulatory requirements.
We have started a capital investment program in order to reach a
level of qualifying production from renewable resources of
approximately 2.5 TWh by year-end 2007, which we believe will
permit us to meet the regulatory requirements and may enable us
to sell green certificates to the market starting in 2007. This
program is expected to result in an additional increase in our
renewable capacity (hydroelectric, wind and geothermal) of about
300 MW by 2010.
Fuel
We use fuel oil, natural gas, coal and other fuels in operating
our thermal generation plants, and also engage in fuel trading
activities. We do not use significant amounts of fuel in
operating our hydroelectric, geothermal or other renewable
resource plants. Italy has small reserves of fossil fuels. As a
consequence, we depend on imported fuel oil, natural gas and
coal for a large proportion of our energy needs.
Our fuel costs are influenced by prices in the world market for
oil, fuel oil, natural gas and coal. In 2005, the per barrel
market price for oil increased from $38.2 at December 31,2004, to $54.4 at December 31, 2005, or by 42.4%. This
substantial increase was the result mainly of geopolitical
factors, such as the current situation in a number of
oil-producing regions, including Iraq, other parts of the Middle
East, Nigeria and Venezuela, as well as structural factors, such
as high production and refinery capacity utilization levels and
increased demand in India, China and the United States. However,
we attempt to maintain secure and flexible supplies by
diversifying our sources of fuel, and are also partially hedged
against rising fuel prices. Please see “Item 3. Key
Information — Risk Factors — Risks Relating
to our Energy Business — Significant increases in fuel
prices or disruptions in our fuel supplies could have a negative
effect on our business” for a description of the risks
connected to significant increases in fuel prices. See also
“Item 11. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure
about Market Risk” for a discussion of our hedging
activities. In addition, we seek to increase our use of less
expensive fuels, such as coal, as well as fuels that have less
impact on the environment when consumed, such as natural gas.
However, generation using coal generally results in higher
emissions levels compared to natural gas. Our ability to
increase our use of coal is dependent on our ability to acquire
and implement technologies that will permit us to comply with
restrictions on emissions established by national and European
Union authorities. Please see “— Regulatory
Matters — Environmental Matters” for a discussion
of these restrictions.
We manage our fuel supply by entering into term contracts for
base quantities and supplementing these contracts with purchases
of fuel on spot markets both in Italy and abroad. Our long-term
fuel contracts, primarily for the purchase of natural gas, will
require us to pay an average of approximately
€2,774 million
per year over the next five years, based on current prices.
Please also see “Item 5. Operating and Financial
Review and Prospects — Contractual Obligations and
Commitments.”
In 2005, our aggregate fuel costs for thermal production,
including fuel transport, at our plants in Italy and abroad were
€3,910 million,
compared to
€3,598 million
in 2004. This 8.7% increase was primarily due to higher prices
in the international fuel markets, the effect of which was only
partially offset by the lower volume of electricity production
during 2005.
From July 1997 until the start of trading on the Italian power
exchange on April 1, 2004, the tariff structure contained
an energy reimbursement component calculated with reference to
an index of weighted average fuel prices and a consumption index
based on the efficiencies expected to be obtained from the fuels
comprising the fuel price index. Accordingly, we sought to use a
mix of fuels less expensive in the aggregate than the fuels
comprising the weighted index and to generate energy more
efficiently than the efficiency levels assumed in the
calculation of the “heat rate” used in the Energy
Authority’s consumption index. This tariff structure also
included incentives to reduce production from thermal plants and
to increase the use of renewable resources.
Since April 1, 2004, the price paid to electricity
producers is determined by competitive bidding on the Italian
power exchange or through freely negotiated bilateral contracts.
Please see “— Regulatory Matters —
Electricity Regulation — The Italian Power
Exchange” for additional information.
The following table provides a breakdown of our net electricity
production in Italy for the periods indicated by primary energy
source utilized. The data represent production by Enel
Produzione and Enel Green Power (which in 2005 was merged into
Enel Produzione).
2003
2004
2005
Net
Net
Net
Electricity
Percentage
Electricity
Percentage
Electricity
Percentage
Produced
of Total
Produced
of Total
Produced
of Total
(GWh)
(GWh)
(GWh)
Thermal
— Natural gas
48,802
35.4
40,602
32.3
37,824
33.7
— Coal and orimulsion
30,030
21.8
30,700
24.4
30,001
26.8
— Oil
27,838
20.2
20,552
16.3
13,998
12.5
Total thermal
106,669
77.4
91,854
73.0
81,823
73.0
Hydroelectric
26,012
18.9
28,659
22.8
24,883
22.2
Geothermal
5,036
3.6
5,120
4.1
5,012
4.5
Wind and photovoltaic
77
0.06
235
0.2
369
0.3
Total
137,794
100.0
%
125,868
100.0
%
112,087
100.0
%
In 2005, the approximate percentages of our net electricity
produced by thermal generation in Italy represented by each of
the following fuels was approximately:
•
46% natural gas;
•
37% coal; and
•
17% fuel oil.
We do not currently generate any electricity using orimulsion.
The fuel oil plant at Porto Tolle, which previously we were
planning to convert to burn orimulsion, will instead be
converted to burn coal upon receipt of the necessary permits.
Our subsidiary Enel Trade is responsible for the purchase and
sale of fuel for all of our domestic generating operations and
our natural gas sales and distribution operations in the Italian
market, as well as a portion of the
fuel requirements of our Spanish subsidiary Viesgo. In addition,
Enel Trade buys and sells other energy products and has land and
sea fuel shipping operations. In 2005, Enel Trade purchased an
aggregate volume of 24.3 million tons of oil and oil
equivalents, including petroleum products, coal and natural gas,
of which 1.6 million were sold to third parties, compared
to purchases of 29.1 million tons of oil and oil
equivalents in 2004, of which 3.6 million were sold to
third parties.
Enel Trade also sells natural gas to gas distribution companies
and other third parties, and engages in fuel trading activities,
as part of its management of, and efforts to optimize, its
supply of fuel to the rest of the Enel Group, as well as in
electricity trading. Enel Trade also trades “green
certificates” in Italy, engages in similar activities at a
European level and engages in trading of
CO2
emission rights, having obtained the necessary approvals. In
2004 and 2005, Enel Trade was also responsible for sales of
electricity to customers with annual consumption higher than 100
GWh (which sales have been carried out by our Market Division
since April 2006). In 2005, Enel Trade sold approximately 10.1
TWh of electricity to Eligible Customers and 3.8 TWh to
resellers in Italy, as well as 15.5 billion cubic meters of
natural gas, of which 8.8 billion cubic meters were sold to
our thermal generation operations, 5.1 billion cubic meters
to our gas distribution and sales operations and
1.6 billion cubic meters to third parties.
Fuel Oil
We are reducing our need for fuel oil for power generation as a
consequence of the conversions of some of our fuel-fired plants
to coal and natural gas. The following table shows the amount of
fuel oil supplied to our generation companies purchased from
domestic and foreign suppliers in each of the periods indicated.
Domestic suppliers include suppliers whose headquarters are in
Italy, including the Italian energy group Eni S.p.A.
(“Eni”), while foreign suppliers include suppliers and
refiners outside of Italy and traders of primarily non-Italian
sources of oil.
In 2005, we purchased approximately 20% of our fuel oil on the
spot market and approximately 80% under contracts ranging in
term from one to twelve months. All purchases made on the basis
of term contracts are indexed to market prices.
The following table shows the amounts of fuel oil with low, mid
and high sulfur content that we purchased in each of the periods
indicated.
We purchase most of our natural gas under long-term, take-or-pay
contracts. The price of natural gas under these contracts is
generally tied to market prices for fuel oil. In 2005, we
purchased 15.5 billion cubic meters of
natural gas, of which 8.8 billion cubic meters were used
for our thermal generation operations. Eni, the main Italian gas
supplier and transporter, supplied approximately 30% of this
natural gas.
We also continued to purchase large volumes under a supply
contract with Sonatrach, the Algerian gas producer, which
accounted for approximately 37% of the natural gas we purchased
in 2005.
In 1992, we entered into a
20-year take-or-pay
contract with NLNG, a Nigerian joint venture, for the supply of
3.5 billion cubic meters of liquefied natural gas per year,
commencing in October 1999. However, due to environmental
concerns, a once-planned Italian regasification facility has
never been constructed. As a result, we are unable to import
liquefied natural gas, and instead, in 1997, entered into a swap
agreement with Gaz de France and related transportation
arrangements with Eni whereby Gaz de France takes the liquefied
natural gas supplied by NLNG under the contract and provides us
with an equivalent volume of non-liquefied natural gas. We
obtained approximately 25% of the natural gas we purchased in
2005 pursuant to our Nigerian gas contract. Under current
regulations, we expect to continue to receive until 2009
reimbursement for part of our stranded costs incurred in
connection with the NLNG contract. Please see
“— Regulatory Matters — Electricity
Regulation — Stranded Costs” for additional
information on reimbursement of our stranded costs.
We purchased 5% of our natural gas in 2005 from Edison S.p.A.
(“Edison”), an Italian gas and electricity company,
and the remaining 3% on a spot basis in the national and
international markets.
On June 21, 2005, we sold to BG Group plc (formerly British
Gas plc) (“BG”) our 50% interest in Brindisi LNG,
which we had formed as a partnership with BG to build and manage
a liquefied natural gas regasification terminal in Brindisi in
southern Italy. Under the terms of the deal, we are entitled to
receive approximately
€44 million,
which was intended to reimburse us for the costs we have
incurred for the project. Of the total consideration, we
received
€17 million
at closing, with the remaining balance of approximately
€27 million
being due within June 30, 2006 (subject to certain
conditions relating to BG’s continuous involvement in the
project).
Coal
In 2005, we purchased 12.8 million tons of coal, all of
which was used by our generating companies and imported,
principally from South Africa, South America, the Far East and
Eastern Europe.
CO2
emission rights
The Kyoto Protocol established a market mechanism for the
trading of
CO2
emission rights. Pursuant to EU directives implementing this
mechanism, the Italian Environment Ministry issued a decree in
February 2006 allocating among Italian producers the emissions
levels for the 2005-2007 period. Our Group was assigned
emissions quotas for its existing installations of
48.2 million, 40.5 million and 39.9 million
metric tons of
CO2
for the years 2005, 2006, 2007, respectively. Our emissions for
2005 were eight million tons higher than the emission quotas we
were assigned for the same year and we believe that the quotas
we have been assigned for 2006 and 2007 will not be sufficient
to meet our production needs in those years. Therefore, in May
2006 we challenged the decree of the Environment Ministry.
The Environment Ministry decree, however, allocates some
emission quotas to new plants when they become operational.
Based on our current emissions projections, we expect to be
entitled to part of these quotas for new plants and to reduce
the difference between our actual emissions and the emission
quotas allocated to us for 2006 and 2007. We will cover any such
difference (which we currently expect will be limited to a few
million tons) through the purchase of emission trading rights on
the market.
Moreover, our subsidiaries Enel Viesgo Generaciņn has been
assigned emission quotas by the Spanish Environment Ministry for
its existing installations of 3.9 million, 3.4 million
and 2.65 million metric tons of
CO2
for the years 2005, 2006 and 2007, respectively. The emissions
of Enel Viesgo Generaciņn in 2005 were 6.06 million
tons, higher than the emission quotas assigned.
At May 25, 2006, the weighted average price for one
emission trading right for the years 2005, 2006 and 2007 was
approximately
€22 per ton.
Each emission trading right corresponds to 1 ton of
CO2
and may also be
sourced through
CO2
credits issued according to the Clean Development Mechanism and
Joint Implementation Project (emission reduction projects under
the terms of the Kyoto Protocol).
Purchased Power
Our Generation and Energy Management Division purchases power to
comply with certain regulatory rules. We also, through Enel
Trade, purchase power to diversify our sources of electricity
and to reduce our costs, as well as for supply to third parties.
In 2005, our Generation and Energy Management Division purchased
approximately 9.4 TWh of power from domestic and foreign
producers to supply electricity to Eligible Customers and
resellers in Italy.
Our Generation and Energy Management Division also purchases
power from outside Italy, through both annual contracts and on
the spot market. In addition, Enel is party to three long-term
contracts for the purchase of imported electricity. These
contracts are for 1,400 MW, 600 MW and 55 MW per
year, expire in 2007, 2011 and 2033, respectively, and were
entered into under regulations in effect prior to the issuance
of the directive implementing the Bersani Decree. Since
April 1, 2004, Enel has been required to sell the imported
electricity purchased pursuant to these long-term supply
contracts to the Single Buyer.
The table below sets forth the amount of electricity imported
into Italy that Enel purchased under long-term contracts and
that Enel Trade purchased under annual contracts, and spot
purchases during each of the years indicated.
The Italian electricity grid is interconnected to foreign
networks through 15 international transmission lines. We believe
these lines are operating at full capacity only during daylight
hours. Please see “— Regulatory
Matters — Electricity Regulation —
Imports” for additional information on the Italian
electricity import market.
Since April 1, 2004, we have also purchased power to comply
with a new rule that took effect with the start of trading on
the Italian power exchange requiring electricity generators to
purchase the electricity used to power pumping at hydroelectric
plants from third parties. We previously used our own
electricity production for these purposes.
International Generation
Our international generation operations in 2005 included Enel
Viesgo Generaciņn, an electricity generation company in
Spain; Enel Uniņn Fenosa Renovables S.A.
(“EUFR”), a company active in Spain in the field of
renewable energy; Maritza East III, a generating company in
Bulgaria; and Enel North America and Enel Latin America which
are active in power generation from renewable sources in North
America and in Central and South America, respectively.
Following the re-organization of our internal structure at the
end of 2005, these international generation activities are no
longer included in our Generation and Energy Management
Division, but are carried out by our new International Division.
We acquired the Spanish company Electra de Viesgo S.L.
(“Viesgo”), which owned Viesgo Generaciņn
(currently Enel Viesgo Generaciņn) as well as certain
distribution companies, from Endesa S.A. in January 2002 for a
total consideration of
€2,070 million,
including
€1,920 million
in cash and the assumption of
€150 million
in debt. Enel Viesgo Generaciņn (currently wholly owned by
Enel Produzione) operates 6 thermal plants and 12 hydroelectric
plants in Spain, which taken together have a total net installed
capacity of approximately 2,264 MW, and, in 2005, had a net
production of 7,423 GWh. Please see
“— Fuel —
CO2
emissions” for more information on emission quotas that
have been assigned to Enel Viesgo Generaciņn.
In March 2003, we acquired from Entergy Power Bulgaria Ltd.
(“Entergy”), through our subsidiary Enel Generation
Holding BV, 60% of the share capital of Maritza East III
Power Holding BV, which in turn holds 73% of Bulgarian
generation company Maritza East III Power Company A.D.
(“Maritza East III”), for
€73.5 million.
Maritza East III, which has 549 MW of net installed
capacity and had a net production of 3,005 GWh in 2005, is
working on the refurbishment, environmental upgrade and
management of its lignite-fired generation plant, located on the
border with Greece. The total financial outlay of Maritza
East III for the project, which is expected to result in an
increase in Maritza East III’s net installed capacity
to 794 MW, is estimated to be about
€499 million,
to be funded through project financing, cash flow from
operations and equity.
In June 2006, Enel purchased from Entergy the remaining 40%
stake in Maritza East III Power Holding BV and 100% of
Maritza O&M Holding Netherlands BV, a Dutch company holding
73% of Maritza East 3 Operating Company A.D. for a total
consideration of
€47.5 million.
In December 2003, we acquired 80% of the share capital of
Uniņn Fenosa Energģas Especiales (now EUFR), from
Uniņn Fenosa Generaciņn SA, for
€178 million.
We granted Uniņn Fenosa Generaciņn SA an option to
repurchase 30% of EUFR’s capital stock before the end
of 2007. In May 2006, Uniņn Fenosa Generaciņn SA
exercised this option and repurchased 30% of EUFR for
approximately
€82 million.
As a result, Uniņn Fenosa Generaciņn SA and we each
hold 50% of EUFR. EUFR’s assets include plants and projects
for the generation of electricity from renewable resources,
primarily wind and hydroelectric facilities. EUFR has
373 MW of net installed capacity currently in operation,
and more than 190 MW in development that we expect to be in
operation by the end of 2006. EUFR’s net production in 2005
was 1,030 GWh.
We have generation operations in the United States through Enel
North America, a North American independent power producer
specializing in renewable resources. At December 31, 2005,
Enel North America operated 65 power plants in the United States
and two in Canada with an aggregate net installed capacity of
402 MW and a net production of approximately 1,283 GWh in
2005. In April 2005, Enel North America acquired full control of
the 25 MW Sheldon Springs hydroelectric project located on
the Missisquoi River in Sheldon, Vermont (in which it had
previously owned a 1% stake). On February 9, 2006, Enel
North America acquired an additional 36% interest in St.
Felicien Cogeneration Limited Partnership (“St.
Felicien”), a 21.4 MW biomass project in Quebec
(Canada), thereby increasing its stake in this company to 96%.
We also have generation operations in Central and South America
through Enel Latin America, another power producer specializing
in renewable resources. At December 31, 2005, Enel Latin
America operated two hydroelectric plants and a wind plant in
Costa Rica, as well as two hydroelectric plants in Chile and two
hydroelectric plants in Guatemala, which together had aggregate
net installed capacity of 198 MW and net production in of
884 GWh in 2005.
Enel ESN Energo, a wholly owned Russian subsidiary of Enel ESN
Management BV, entered into a three-year agreement (renewable
for an additional year) in June 2004 with OAO North-West CHPP to
manage North West Thermal Power Plant (“NWTPP”), a
CCGT generation plant near St. Petersburg with installed
capacity of approximately 450 MW. NWTPP is controlled by
RAO UES, the company that operates Russia’s unified power
system. At present, NWTPP is engaged in the construction of a
second unit with installed capacity of 450 MW, which is
expected to be operational at the end of 2006. Enel ESN
Management BV is a joint venture currently held 75% by us and
25% by ZAO ESN, a privately held Russian company.
As part of our international expansion objectives and our
efforts to consolidate our presence in Central and Eastern
Europe, on April 28, 2006 we purchased a 66% interest in
SE, the principal electric power generation company in Slovakia,
with an estimated market share of more than 80%, for
approximately
€840 million
and entered into a shareholders’ agreement with the
state-owned entity National Property Fund, the remaining
shareholder of SE. SE has total net installed capacity of
6,356 MW, of which 38% is nuclear-powered, 37% is
hydroelectric-powered and 25% is powered by conventional thermal
sources. This acquisition marks our re-entry into the field of
nuclear power generation; we have not owned any nuclear power
plants since November 2000, and we have not produced electricity
from nuclear power plants since 1988. Please see
“— Regulatory Matters — Environmental
Matters — Discontinued Nuclear Operations.” SE
owned prior to our acquisition six nuclear power units with net
installed capacity of 400 MW each, which we believe were
equipped with internationally accepted technology. Prior to the
closing certain conditions were fulfilled, including the
approval by the Slovakian government of the strategic investment
plan we prepared for SE for the 2006-2013 period and
the transfer to state-owned companies of the assets and
liabilities (including spent nuclear fuel and the radioactive
waste) of a nuclear power plant built in 1970 and operational
since 1978, that is in the process of being
decommissioned, and the disposal of a water plant, as well as
the approval by the Slovakian government of legislation on a new
fund for the decommissioning of nuclear installations in
Slovakia and new rules governing the Slovakian electricity
market. The four nuclear power units that SE now retains have
been recognized by the International Atomic Energy Association
as being in line with Western European security standards. SE
will continue to sell the energy produced by the spun-off assets
to the Slovakian market and reimburse the state-owned company
for the costs it incurs in the operation of the plants.
On May 30, 2005, we entered into a non-binding memorandum
of understanding with EDF for an industrial partnership
permitting us to invest in the French electricity market,
including in EDF’s latest generation European Pressurized
Water Reactor, or “EPR,” nuclear reactor project,
which is expected to be fully operational by 2012. Under the
terms of this memorandum of understanding: Enel will have a
12.5% stake in EDF’s EPR project; Enel will bear its
proportional share of the costs associated with the project,
including investment, operating and fuel costs, as well as its
share of budgeted reactor decommissioning costs and the
corresponding share of the back-end fuel and waste disposal
costs; EDF will be the operator of the power plant, and will
bear any related nuclear civil liability; Enel will receive a
share of the generation capacity and output proportional to its
initial stake in the project, which may be increased, so long as
EDF retains a majority interest. The parties had agreed to
execute a definitive agreement by September 30, 2005,
subject to the receipt of a favorable non-binding opinion of the
European Commission, which it has not yet released. Although the
parties have not executed a definitive agreement, pursuant to
the memorandum of understanding we have been receiving a portion
of the electricity generated by EDF from nuclear sources since
January 1, 2006, which is expected to increase over time to
a maximum of 1,200 MW, pending completion of the EPR
project.
On April 24, 2006, we submitted a binding offer for the
acquisition of a 90% interest in Paroplinovy Cyklus Bratislava,
a Slovakian electricity generation company with an installed
capacity of 220 MW, in which our subsidiary SE holds the
remaining 10% interest. We expect that the outcome of this offer
will not be known before August 2006.
On May 15, 2006, we submitted a binding offer for the
acquisition from Hydro-Quebec International of a 24.55% interest
in Fortuna, a company that owns a 300 MW hydro-plant in
Panama.
On June 9, 2006, we entered into an agreement with Grupo
Rede for the acquisition of 11 companies, which own
concessions to operate hydroelectric plants in Brazil with an
aggregate installed capacity of 98 MW, for a total
consideration of 450 million Brazilian real (approximately
€155 million).
Closing of the transaction is subject to certain conditions,
including approval by the Brazilian electricity authority, and
is expected in the second half of 2006.
The following table shows the net installed capacity at
December 31, 2005, of our foreign generating companies
broken down by type of plant. Net installed capacity excludes
capacity held by unconsolidated associated companies.
Enel
Enel
Total at
North
Latin
Maritza
Uniņn
December 31,
America
America
Viesgo
East III
Fenosa
2005
(MW)
Thermal
—
—
1,592
549
—
2,141
Hydroelectric
313
174
672
—
—
1,159
Wind
67
24
—
—
321
412
Biomass and Biogas
22
—
—
—
—
22
Cogeneration
—
—
—
—
52
52
Total
402
198
2,264
549
373
3,786
Our international operations generated a total of 13,625 GWh of
electricity in 2005, as compared to 12,321 GWh in 2004,
including 7,423 GWh produced by Enel Viesgo Generaciņn
(6,062 GWh in 2004), 3,005 GWh
produced by Maritza East III (3,213 GWh in 2004), 2,167 GWh
produced by our North and Latin American companies (2,193 GWh in
2004) and 1,030 GWh generated by EUFR (853 GWh in 2004).
Sales, Infrastructure and Networks
In 2005, our Sales, Infrastructure and Networks Division carried
out our electricity and natural gas sales and distribution
operations. At the end of 2005, this division was divided into a
Market Division and an Infrastructure and Networks Division,
each of which operates in both the electricity and gas markets
and are responsible for sales of products and services and for
management of our distribution network, respectively. In
addition, at the end of 2005 our electricity sales and
distribution operations outside of Italy were allocated to our
new International Division.
Our Infrastructure and Networks Division operates in Italy
mainly through Enel Distribuzione, which distributes and sells
electricity on Italy’s regulated market, Deval, which
distributes and sells electricity in the region of Valle
d’Aosta in Italy, and Enel Rete Gas, which distributes
natural gas in Italy.
Our Market Division sells electricity and natural gas and
provides electricity-related services, mainly through Enel
Energia, which sells electricity on the free market, and Enel
Gas, which resells natural gas to end users. Until March 2006,
Enel Energia sold electricity on the free market to customers
with annual consumption up to 100 GWh, while electricity to
consumers with annual consumption above this threshold was sold
by our Generation and Energy Management Division.
Other subsidiaries in this area include Enel Sole, which offers
public lighting services, and Enel.si, which offers electricity
systems-related services and
“beyond-the-meter”
products and services, such as consulting and sales of
electricity equipment.
Domestic Distribution and Sales Operations
Electricity Companies
We operate in the market for the distribution and sale of
electricity in Italy through the following companies:
•
Enel Distribuzione, which owns the electricity distribution
network serving the free and regulated markets and sells
electricity on the regulated market;
•
Deval, a subsidiary in which we own a 51% interest, which
engages in similar activities in the region of Valle
d’Aosta ;
•
Enel Energia, which sells electricity on the free market to
customers with annual consumption of up to 100 GWh (while sales
to customers with higher consumption levels are made through
Enel Trade of our Generation and Energy Management Division);
•
Enel Sole, which provides public and art lighting
services; and
•
Enel.si, which provides electricity systems-related services.
The Italian electricity market comprises a free market, in which
Eligible Customers may participate, and the regulated market, in
which Non-Eligible Customers are required to participate and
Eligible Customers may continue to participate if they so
choose. Please see “— Regulatory
Matters — Electricity Regulation” for additional
information.
Distribution of Electricity
We own and operate the principal electricity distribution
network in Italy. We use the term “distribution” to
refer to the transport of electricity from the transmission grid
to end users. Enel Distribuzione, our wholly owned subsidiary,
holds almost all of our distribution assets and operations,
excepts for the assets and operations held by Deval in Valle
d’Aosta. Its main responsibilities consist of operating and
maintaining the distribution network, distributing electricity
to the free market and distributing and selling electricity on
the regulated market.
The following table sets forth the aggregate volumes of
electricity distributed to the free market and distributed to
(and sold) on the regulated market by Enel Distribuzione and
Deval for the periods indicated, excluding electricity
distributed to resellers.
The total volume of electricity we distributed in 2005 increased
by 0.2% compared to the volume distributed in 2004. The volume
of electricity we distributed to the free market increased by
6.7% compared to 2004, reflecting an increase in the number of
Eligible Customers and their migration to the free market. The
volume of electricity we distributed (and sold) to the regulated
market decreased by 5.3% in 2005 compared to 2004, primarily
reflecting the fact that since April 1, 2004, other
electricity distributors acquire their electricity directly from
the Single Buyer, while prior to that date, we were obliged to
buy electricity on their behalf. The decrease also reflected our
sale of local distribution networks in Trento and other smaller
municipalities. Please see “— Regulatory
Matters — Electricity Regulation — Eligible
and Non-Eligible Customers” for additional information on
consumers eligible to participate in the free market. Including
electricity transported to resellers, we distributed a total of
265,055 GWh, 261,239 GWh and 259,277 GWh of electricity in 2003,
2004 and 2005, respectively.
We have focused on reducing operating costs in our electricity
distribution operations, as well as our electricity sales
operations, in recent years. In particular, we have reduced the
aggregate number of employees involved in these operations by
11.5% over the past three years, and by approximately 23% from
December 31, 2001 to December 31, 2005. In the future,
we expect this trend to continue, but with a decrease in the
volume of reductions. The following table shows the aggregate
number of employees of Enel Distribuzione and Deval at the dates
indicated:
We have also been investing in our Telemanagement digital meter
system since 1999 in connection with our focus on reducing
costs. Please see “— Telemanagement System”
below for additional information.
Electricity Distribution Network
The table below sets forth certain information about our primary
and secondary distribution networks at December 31, 2005.
In September 2003, pursuant to a ministerial decree, Enel
Distribuzione transferred to Terna the ownership of
approximately 900 kilometer of high-voltage transmission lines.
Enel Distribuzione transferred an additional 100 kilometer of
high-voltage transmission lines to Terna in 2004.
Our replacement and construction of distribution lines and
substations are subject to Italian environmental and aesthetic
regulatory limitations, including legislation on electromagnetic
fields that may make it more difficult to build new distribution
lines and substations in the future and may require removing
existing distribution lines and substations. Please see
“— Regulatory Matters — Environmental
Matters — Electromagnetic Fields” for a more
detailed description of the environmental laws and regulations
affecting our distribution operations and the risks they pose
for our business.
Consolidation of Electricity Distribution Networks
The Bersani Decree included provisions for the consolidation of
distribution networks in municipalities served by more than one
electric utility, giving certain municipal networks the right to
request that we sell our distribution network in their
municipalities. As a consequence, we have been forced to sell to
a significant number of these networks in the past few years. In
2005, we sold local distribution networks to one municipality,
serving a total of approximately 9,600 clients and having an
annual sales volume of approximately 160 million kWh, for
an aggregate consideration of approximately
€14 million.
From January 1, 2001, through December 31, 2005, we
sold a number of local distribution networks, including those in
the Rome, Milan and Turin metropolitan areas, serving an
aggregate of approximately 1.90 million customers, for
aggregate consideration of approximately
€1,903 million.
At the same time, we acquired the distribution networks of 62
other small municipalities, serving an aggregate of
approximately 22,762 clients, for aggregate consideration of
€18.6 million.
Negotiations are currently pending regarding our sale of the
distribution networks of 27 small municipalities and our
acquisition of the distribution networks of certain other small
municipalities.
The distribution networks that we sold were more profitable than
our average distribution network, mainly because distribution in
metropolitan areas has lower costs because of the high customer
concentration. In 2004, the Energy Authority put in place a
mechanism to compensate affected distributors for some of the
comparative disadvantages of serving non-urban areas. Please see
“— Regulatory Matters — Electricity
Regulation — The Tariff Structure.”
In addition to the divestitures carried out pursuant to the
Bersani Decree, on December 31, 2003, we sold our network
in Brescia and 45 neighboring municipalities, which served an
aggregate of 100,205 clients and had an annual sales volume of
2.8 billion kWh, for total consideration of
€168 million.
On June 27, 2006, Enel Distribuzione and Hera S.p.A.
(formerly Meta S.p.A.), an Italian energy and waste-management
company, agreed on the sale of our electricity distribution and
sales activities in 18 municipalities of the province of Modena,
serving approximately 80,000 customers, for a total
consideration of
€107.5 million.
The sale will be effective as of July 1, 2006.
On December 21, 2004, pursuant to the Presidential Decree
no. 235/77 and the Legislative Decree no. 463/99, we entered
into a settlement agreement with SET Distribuzione S.p.A.
(“SET”), a company controlled by the Province of
Trento, providing for our sale to SET of our local distribution
network in that province. In 2003, local authorities had issued
an expropriation order that was intended to force us to transfer
to SET this electricity distribution network, which comprises
approximately 6,700 kilometer of distribution lines and 3,000
substations, serves approximately 223,000 customers and employs
approximately 250 people. We had appealed this order to the
Administrative Tribunal of Trentino Alto Adige. In accordance
with the settlement agreement, we sold this network to SET for
total consideration of
€169 million
on July 1, 2005.
We are currently in negotiations with the Province of Bolzano
for the sale of our local distribution network in that province.
The regulated market for electricity sales in Italy consists of:
•
All Non-Eligible Customers, or customers who do not meet the
consumption threshold for participation in the free
market; and
•
Those Eligible Customers, or customers who meet the consumption
threshold for participation in the free market, that choose not
to participate in it.
The consumption threshold for qualification as an Eligible
Customer, which is set by regulation, has decreased over time,
reducing the number of customers who must buy electricity on the
regulated market. Please see “— Regulatory
Matters — Electricity Regulation — Eligible
and Non-Eligible Customers” for further information. The
Marzano Law provides for the complete liberalization of sales in
the electricity market from July 1, 2007, when all
customers will be eligible to purchase electricity on the free
market. The law provides that the Single Buyer will nonetheless
continue to supply electricity to consumers who choose not to
leave the regulated market.
The following table sets forth the amount of electricity we
distributed to the free market and the amount of electricity we
distributed and sold on the regulated market in 2004 and 2005,
excluding sales to resellers, broken down by type of
distribution line, as well as the revenues generated by these
activities. Revenues for electricity distributed to the free
market represent transport charges, while revenues from sales to
the regulated market represent both transport charges and the
cost of electricity sold. The breakdown by type of distribution
line reflects the breakdown made by the Energy Authority in
establishing tariff categories. Please see
“— Regulatory Matters — Electricity
Regulation — The Tariff Structure” for additional
information on electricity tariffs.
2004
2005
Distributed
Distributed
and Sold
and Sold
Distributed
on the
Distributed
on the
to the Free
Regulated
to the Free
Regulated
Market
Market
Total
Revenues
Market
Market
Total
Revenues
(In GWh)
(Millions
(In GWh)
(Millions
of euro)
of euro)
High voltage(1)
45,083
4,827
49,910
€529
46,212
5,319
51,131
€611
Medium voltage
63,372
23,966
87,338
2,782
67,060
20,247
87,307
2,641
Low voltage
5,236
108,168
113,404
11,791
8,098
104,111
112,209
12,260
Total
113,691
136,961
250,652
€15,102
121,370
129,677
251,047
€15,512
(1)
High-voltage sales on the regulated market are sales to the
Ferrovie dello Stato, the Italian railway system. All
high-voltage customers are Eligible Customers.
In 2005, the volume of electricity we distributed to customers
connected to high voltage lines, generally large industrial
customers, increased by 2.4%, reflecting increasing industrial
activity in Italy during the year.
For medium-voltage lines, which generally serve medium-sized
businesses, electricity distributed and sold on the regulated
market decreased by 15.5%, primarily reflecting the significant
increase in the number of customers eligible to participate on
the free market in 2005, many of whom migrated to that market.
As a result of this migration, distribution of electricity to
the free market over medium-voltage lines increased by 5.8%.
The amount of electricity we distributed to the free market over
low-voltage distribution lines, which generally serve small
business and residential customers, increased by more than 50%
in 2005. Reflecting the extension of Eligible Customer status to
all non-residential customers as of July 1, 2004.
Electricity distributed and sold to low-voltage customers on the
regulated market decreased by 3.7%, reflecting mainly the fact
that in 2004 we had billed customers for the energy we had
dispatched to them, but for which we had not billed them, during
2003 and 2004 following the introduction of a method that
allowed us to determine how much electricity had been dispatched
but not billed.
On April 1, 2004, a new pool market for the trading of
electricity, the Italian power exchange, became operational as
part of the continuing liberalization of the Italian electricity
market. Under the new system, generation companies may sell
their electricity on the Italian power exchange or through
bilateral contracts with other market participants. In addition,
as part of the new system, the Single Buyer, a company wholly
owned by the GRTN, is now responsible for ensuring the supply of
electricity to customers who purchase their electricity on the
regulated market. As a result, our generation companies are now
required to sell electricity destined for regulated customers to
the Single Buyer, and our distribution companies are now
required to purchase electricity to be distributed and sold on
the regulated market from the Single Buyer. Please see
“— Regulatory Matters — Electricity
Regulation — The Italian Power Exchange” and
“— Regulatory Matters — Electricity
Regulation — The Single Buyer” for additional
information.
Telemanagement System
Since 1999, we have been rolling out our
“Telemanagement” digital metering system in Italy, in
order to create an integrated system able remotely to manage and
read electricity meters. This system is intended to help us
(i) reduce costs associated with physical measurement of
consumption and on-site
maintenance of meters by our personnel, as these tasks would be
accomplished remotely; (ii) measure more accurately the
electricity consumption of our customers; (iii) improve our
response times in providing technical assistance to our
customers; and (iv) offer our customers diversified tariff
plans that promote the use of electricity in off-peak periods.
As of December 31, 2005, we had approximately
27 million digital meters installed, of which approximately
25 million were already remotely connected to our system.
Please see “— Capital Investment
Program — Sales, Infrastructure and Networks” for
additional information on the roll-out of this system and the
related capital expenditures we have incurred. As of
March 31, 2006, we had installed 27.6 million digital
meters, of which approximately 25.5 million were connected
to the remote network. To complete the roll-out, we still must
install an additional 3.5 million meters and remotely
connect 4.5 million meters to the system.
The Telemanagement system has permitted Enel Distribuzione,
starting in 2004, to launch new tariff options for residential
customers tailored to customers’ consumption habits. The
Telemanagement system permits us to monitor precisely when a
customer is consuming electricity and apply and bill the
relevant peak/off-peak prices. In particular, we offer a
so-called “Night and Day” tariff, which sets
electricity prices according to the time of day in which
customers use electricity, allowing them to control more
effectively their electricity expenses. In 2005, we launched two
additional tariff options, the so-called “One” tariff,
tailored for customers with low consumption who prefer to pay a
flat fee, and the so-called “August” tariff, tailored
for customers with a holiday house, to permit them to pay for
electricity service only for the period in which they use their
property.
Customer Service
Providing high-quality customer service is an important part of
our commercial strategy. In recent years, Enel Distribuzione has
reorganized its sales network to change the manner in which
customer relations are managed. We have expanded our customer
services to provide customers with access to us through a number
of different channels, and we have introduced specialized
departments to manage relations with corporate and individual
customers. Among other things, we have a customer call center,
targeted primarily at individual consumers, and provide a
self-service area through our Internet portal. The call center
is supported by both a national documentation center located in
southern Italy, which receives, processes and electronically
files all contractual documentation, and by a national printing
center, which prints and distributes all correspondence with
customers. As of December 31, 2005, our customer service
network also included approximately 130 retail locations managed
directly by Enel Distribuzione, 190 key account managers
dedicated to mid-size business customers and 1,000
“QuiEnel” retail locations, which include QuiEnel
points in Enel.si and Wind stores and in approximately 200 post
offices.
The Energy Authority has issued guidelines setting targets for
electricity service continuity (based on minutes of service
interruptions per year) and quality (such as waiting time for
appointments). The Energy Authority has also instituted a system
that grants bonuses to companies that exceed targets for
continuity of service or lack of service interruptions, and
imposes penalties on companies that fail to meet them. Please
see “— Regulatory Matters — Electricity
Regulation — Continuity and Quality of Service
Regulation.”
Distributors that outperform the targets are paid their bonuses
through a component of the tariff structure. We have on average
consistently exceeded our continuity of service targets, and
received resulting bonus payments, for each year since 2000. In
2005, we received a
€63 million
bonus for having outperformed the continuity of service targets
in 2004. We estimate that in 2005, our average duration of
service interruptions per customer decreased to 64 minutes, or
by approximately 11%, from 72 minutes in 2003, largely as a
result of improvements in the accuracy of the method we use to
calculate this measure. We expect to receive, in the second half
of 2006, at least
€85 million
in bonus payments with respect to continuity of service for 2005.
In May 2005, the Energy Authority issued proposals for public
comment for the institution of a system of automatic
compensation payable by electricity distributors to affected
customers in the event of a blackout or other widespread and
prolonged service interruption. Please see
“— Regulatory Matters — Electricity
Regulation — Continuity and Quality of Service
Regulation.”
Sales of Electricity to the Free Market
Since July 1, 2004, all Italian non-residential customers
(approximately 7 million consumers) have qualified as
Eligible Customers, and may choose to purchase electricity on
the free market.
According to our internal estimates, total Italian electricity
consumption on the free market increased by approximately 6% in
2005 to 136 TWh, representing approximately 47% of total Italian
electricity consumption for the year. We believe our share of
the free market in 2005 was approximately 14% (as compared to
16% in 2004). In 2005, approximately 79% of the electricity
distributed in Italy was distributed to Eligible Customers. We
currently expect that in 2006, total Italian electricity
consumption on the free market will be approximately 151 TWh, or
approximately 51% of total Italian electricity consumption for
the year.
In 2005, Enel Energia continued to focus its operation on sales
to Eligible Customers with annual consumption up to 100 GWh.
Enel Energia sold 8.4 TWh of electricity to Eligible Customers
during 2005, generating revenues of
€812 million.
The amount of electricity sold by Enel Energia on the free
market in 2005 was approximately 13% higher than the 7.5 TWh
sold in 2004, which generated revenues of
€648 million.
Consumers with annual consumption above 100 GWh are served by
Enel Trade in our Generation and Energy Management Division. In
2005, Enel Trade sold approximately 10.1 TWh of electricity to
Eligible Customers, as well as 3.8 TWh to resellers in Italy. In
2004, Enel Trade sold approximately 13.4 TWh of electricity to
Eligible Customers, and 5.5 TWh of electricity to resellers, who
since April 1, 2004, have generally purchased their
electricity directly from the Single Buyer.
The progressive liberalization of the Italian electricity market
requires that Enel Energia provide its customers with
increasingly flexible and competitive services that go beyond
providing a reliable supply of electricity.
As part of our marketing efforts, we have implemented a series
of customer initiatives including:
•
specially tailored contract terms for different types of
customers; and
•
value-added services such as energy monitoring and management.
International Distribution and Sales Operations
In 2005, the international activities of our Sales,
Infrastructure and Networks Division included our electricity
distribution and sales activities outside of Italy. Following
the re-organization of our internal structure effective as of
January 1, 2006, these international operations are no
longer included in our Sales, Infrastructure
and Networks Division (now the Market Division and
Infrastructure and Networks Division), but are carried out by
our new International Division.
We carry out our international distribution and sales activities
in Spain through our wholly owned subsidiaries Electra de Viesgo
Distribuciņn SL and Enel Viesgo Energia SL, and in Romania
through Enel Electrica Banat S.A and Enel Electrica Dobrogea
S.A. On April 28, 2005, Enel Distribuzione acquired a 51%
interest in each of Electrica Banat S.A (now Enel Electrica
Banat S.A.) and Electrica Dobrogea S.A. (now Enel Electrica
Dobrogea S.A.), purchasing approximately 25% of each of these
companies’ share capital from Electrica S.A., a Romanian
state-owned company, and simultaneously subscribing to a capital
increase of approximately 26% in each of these companies for an
aggregate consideration of
€131 million
(including price adjustments).
In accordance with EU law, electricity sales in Spain are also
divided between a free and a regulated market. Please see
“— Regulatory Matters — Electricity
Regulation” for a discussion of relevant EU law. In 2005,
our sales of electricity in Spain amounted to 4,861 GWh
(compared to 3,709 GWh in 2004), of which 3,576 GWh were sold by
Electra de Viesgo Distribuciņn SL to the regulated market
and 1,285 GWh by Enel Viesgo Energia SL to the free market
(compared to 749 GWh in 2004). In addition, Electra de Viesgo
Distribuciņn SL owns 29,662 kilometers of distribution
network and it distributed 5,196 GWh of electricity in 2005
(compared with 4,952 GWh in 2004) to 625,000 customers in the
Spanish regulated market (611,000 customers in 2004).
Enel Electrica Banat S.A., which operates in western Romania,
and Enel Electrica Dobrogea S.A., which operates in eastern
Romania, own an aggregate of 80,100 kilometers of distribution
network and in 2005 distributed 4,455 GWh of electricity in the
Romanian regulated market to 1,441,000 customers. In 2005, these
companies sold 3,232 GWh of electricity, mostly in the regulated
market. We expect these two companies to undertake major
investment programs to improve their distribution networks in
order to increase efficiency and the quality of service.
In June 2006, we won the auction for a 67.5% stake in the
Romanian power distribution company Electrica Muntenia Sud
(“EMS”), an electricity distribution company with
1.1 million customers and a 45,350 kilometer distribution
grid in the region of Bucharest, Romania, for total
consideration of
€820 million.
Upon the successful completion of this transaction, we expect to
serve approximately 2.5 million customers in Romania.
In addition, in June 2006 we acquired from the ESN Group a 49.5%
interest in Res Holding, a Dutch company holding 100% of the
Russian power sale company RusEnergoSbyt for total consideration
of $105 million (corresponding to approximately
€88 million).
The company had approximately 11TWh of annual sales in 2005.
The following table shows our international electricity sales on
the regulated and free markets in Spain and Romania, as well as
the electricity dispatched on our foreign distribution networks
in Spain and Romania, in each of the years indicated.
Information about Romania is provided only from the date of our
entry in this market on April 28, 2005.
2003
2004
2005
Electricity sales (TWh)(1)
3.943
4.458
8.093
Electricity sales on the regulated market (TWh)(1)
3.734
3.709
6.766
Electricity sales on the free market (TWh)(1)
0.209
0.749
1.327
Electricity transported on our distribution networks (TWh)(2)
4.741
4.952
9.651
(1)
Excluding sales to resellers
(2)
Excluding electricity distributed to resellers
Public and Art Lighting
Enel Sole operates our public lighting services in Italy. Enel
Sole targets the general market for public lighting, as well as
the market for customized lighting systems for monuments, public
squares, churches and
other landmarks and public spaces. Enel Sole offers both indoor
and outdoor lighting systems, and provides maintenance services
for the systems and the related electricity plants.
In 2005, Enel Sole built lighting systems for third parties with
an aggregate value of approximately
€36 million.
In addition, Enel Sole signed new contracts for approximately
89,000 public lighting points throughout Italy in 2005. As of
December 31, 2005, Enel Sole managed approximately
1.8 million public lighting sites in more than 4,000 client
municipalities.
Electricity Systems-related Services
Enel.si offers our clients electricity systems-related services
through a franchising network made up of selected companies
which operate in the electrical maintenance and installation
business. Enel.si franchises draw on the technical capabilities
of the Enel Group to assist clients in optimizing their use of
electricity, as well as to offer them consulting and personnel
training services.
At the end of 2005, Enel.si had a total of 404 franchise stores
focusing on the retail market (residential and small office/home
office customers), offering services and products aimed at
providing safety (such as safer electrical installations and
security systems), energy efficiency (such as air conditioning,
heating, and home automation systems) and environmentally
friendly energy systems (such as solar, thermal and small
photovoltaic plants).
Enel.si also provides business customers full assistance with
their energy facilities, including construction and maintenance
services for small co-generation power plants and medium-large
photovoltaic plants.
Gas Distribution and Sales
We distribute and sell natural gas to end users in Italy through:
•
Enel Rete Gas and other minor companies, which own local
distribution networks in specific parts of Italy and hold the
related concessions for their use; and
•
Enel Gas and Easygas (which we acquired in October 2005), which
sell natural gas to end users.
The Italian natural gas market is undergoing a process of
liberalization. Under current legislation, the natural gas
market was supposed to have been completely liberalized as of
January 1, 2003, with all consumers able to freely choose
their supplier and all sellers able to freely set prices to all
customers. However, while all consumers are now able to freely
choose their supplier, the Energy Authority retained the right
to control prices for certain, mainly household consumers that
qualified as Gas Non-Eligible Customers as of January 1,2003. Please see “— Regulatory
Matters — Gas Regulation” for a more detailed
discussion of gas regulation in Italy.
While full market liberalization is still developing, we believe
that the most effective way for us to build our natural gas
business is through acquisitions of other distributors or client
bases. We believe that expanding our natural gas distribution
activities offers us opportunities for potential synergies,
including, for example, the ability to schedule and perform gas
and electric network maintenance and upgrades in the same area
at the same time and the ability to use call centers for both
gas and electricity customers, as well as certain competitive
advantages, including potential cost savings from economies of
scale. Since March 2005, we have offered Eligible Customers in
several Italian cities, including Rome and Milan, “dual
fuel”contracts, providing electricity and gas service
through one sales network, with one customer service department
and one bill.
We have acquired several gas distribution companies with
operations in various Italian regions over the past several
years. These acquisitions include those of the Colombo Gas Group
in 2000, So.ge.gas and Agas in 2001 and Camuzzi Gazometri
(subsequently renamed Enel Rete Gas) in 2002. Through these
acquisitions, as of 2003, we had become the second-largest
operator in the Italian gas distribution market, second only to
Eni’s subsidiary, Italgas, the incumbent provider,
according to a study of the Italian gas industry by Anigas (the
Italian association of gas distribution companies) published in
2005. In acquiring Camuzzi Gazometri, we acquired both
significant gas distribution assets and Camuzzi Gazometri’s
waste management operations. In February 2004, we sold
Camuzzi’s waste management operations, the Aimeri Group, to
Green Holding for approximately
€14 million.
In January 2004, we acquired Sicilmetano and Sicilmetano Energy,
which distributed and sold natural gas to 37,000 customers in
Sicily, for
€40 million.
On September 15, 2004, we acquired from Metanambiente 100%
of two gas companies — a distribution company, Ottogas
Rete, and a sales company Ottogas Vendita — for an
aggregate purchase price of
€31.5 million.
These companies together have approximately 36,000 customers in
the provinces of Naples and Salerno. In December 2004, we
acquired 100% of Italgestioni, a distribution company, and
Italgestioni Gas, a sales company, which together serve
approximately 34,000 customers in 83 municipalities in the
provinces of Calabria and Naples, for
€32 million.
On December 31, 2004, Enel Distribuzione Gas, GE.AD. and
Sicilmetano were merged into Enel Rete Gas and Sicilmetano
Energy was merged into Enel Gas. On June 30, 2005, Ottogas
Rete, Italgestioni and other minor companies were merged into
Enel Rete Gas, and Ottogas Vendita and Italgestioni Gas were
merged into Enel Gas.
In October 2005, we acquired two companies from Italtecna,
Metanodotti Padani, a distribution company, and Easygas, a sales
company, for an aggregate purchase price of about
€23 million.
These companies together have approximately 19,000 customers in
the northern Italian provinces of Rovigo, Padova, Trento,
Mantova, Ferrara and Modena. In January 2006, we acquired from
Thüga (an Italian subsidiary of the E.On Group) the
distribution company Simeo, which serves approximately 24,000
customers in Sicily, for approximately
€37 million.
We intend to merge Metanodotti Padani and Simeo into Enel Rete
Gas, and Easygas into Enel Gas, by December 31, 2006.
As of December 31, 2005, we offered natural gas
distribution services in 1,205 municipalities (as compared to
1,188 in 2004) and operated on approximately 29,869 kilometer of
network. In 2005, we distributed 333 million cubic meters
of natural gas on behalf of gas companies that are not part of
the Enel Group (as compared to 139 million in 2004) and
3.6 billion cubic meters to end users on behalf of gas
companies of the Enel Group (as compared to 3.7 billion in
2004). As of December 31, 2005, we distributed natural gas
to 1,983,741 end users (as compared to 1,966,264 in 2004), or
approximately 8% of natural gas customers in Italy, based on
figures provided by Anigas, the Italian association of gas
distribution companies.
In 2005, we sold approximately 5.1 billion cubic meters of
natural gas to more than 2.1 million end users (as compared
to the approximately 5.2 billion cubic meters of natural
gas sold to nearly 2.0 million end users in 2004),
representing 10.5% of natural gas customers in Italy. The
following table shows the total amount of natural gas we sold to
end users in 2004 and 2005 in millions of cubic meters, and the
number of customers to whom these sales were made, broken down
by type of customer.
2004
2005
Retail (millions of
m3)
2,783
3,021
Business
2,403
2,068
Natural gas sold
5,186
5,089
Retail
1,963,577
2,140,865
Business
2,038
2,129
Number of customers
1,965,615
2,142,994
These figures do not include the 1.6 billion cubic meters
and 1.7 billion cubic meters of natural gas sold to third
parties in 2005 and 2004, respectively, by Enel Trade, which is
part of our Generation and Energy Management Division.
Competition in the Electricity and Gas Markets
We face competition in the markets for electricity generation,
and sales of electricity and natural gas. Instead, there is no
competition in the market for electricity or gas distribution,
which are natural local monopolies.
Electricity generation. In 2005, we accounted for
approximately 39% of Italian electricity production. We
purchased approximately 35% of the electricity imported into
Italy, and also purchased electricity produced by
independent power producers and electricity produced from
renewable resources under the CIP 6 regime, which the GRTN buys
from producers and resells at auction on the free market.
As a result of limitations on the production and import of
electricity imposed by the Bersani Decree, we were required to
sell plants with a total installed net capacity of at least 15.0
GW by January 1, 2003. In order to comply with the
requirement, we created and sold the Gencos, after transferring
an aggregate of approximately 16.0 GW of gross installed
capacity to them. At December 31, 2005, we estimate that we
had approximately 49% of total Italian net installed capacity,
as compared to approximately 75% at the start of 2001.
The disposal of the Gencos has exposed us to increasing
competition from other generating companies. Our competitors
also include domestic independent power producers, municipal
utility companies and foreign operators that have acquired
Italian generation assets or export electricity to the Italian
market. In addition to the introduction on April 1, 2004,
of trading on the Italian power exchange, we expect that
competition will increase further due to:
•
An increase in bilateral contracts between our competitors and
final customers;
•
Regulations limiting each operator’s access to
international electricity sources to a maximum percentage of
available interconnection capacity; and
•
The development of new interconnection lines that will increase
the volume of electricity that may be imported in Italy. Through
2005, other producers were authorized to build approximately 20
GW of new generating capacity in Italy, of which approximately 6
GW is already operational, and another 8 GW is expected to be
operational by 2010. For imports, we expect an additional 2.1 GW
of capacity to become available between 2006 and 2010, of which
1.3 GW of import capacity has already become available.
In addition, on May 7, 2005, the Energy Authority issued
for public comment proposals for possible measures to promote
competition in the wholesale electricity market and limit the
impact of market power held by dominant producers. Please see
“— Regulatory Matters — Electricity
Regulation — The Italian Power Exchange” for
additional information on these proposals.
Our main competitors in Italy are Edison, the three former
Gencos — Edipower, Endesa Italia and Tirreno
Power — and Eni. According to their respective annual
reports, in 2005 Edipower had a reported installed capacity of
8.3 GW, Edison had a reported capacity of 6.9 GW, Endesa Italia
had a reported capacity of 6.6 GW, Eni had a reported capacity
of 4.7 GW and Tirreno Power had a reported capacity of 3.3 GW.
The following table sets forth the main energy producers in
Italy and the amount of energy they produced in 2005 in GWh. It
also shows this production as a percentage of the total amount
of energy produced in Italy during the year, as well as the
percentage of the electricity demand in Italy during the year
that was met by such production. Italian electricity demand has
historically exceeded the amount of electricity produced in the
country each year, with the difference being made up through
electricity imports.
Enel elaboration based on provisional data for Italy from Terna,
and publicly available information of other producers.
*
Excluding stakes in former Gencos.
The following table shows the main energy producers in Italy and
our estimates of the net installed capacity of each producer in
GW, as well as the total net installed capacity in Italy, for
each of the years indicated.
Net Installed Capacity (GW) by Producer
2004
2005
Enel
42.0
42.2
Former Gencos
17.5
18.2
Eni
3.6
4.7
Edison*
5.7
6.9
Main municipal electricity companies*
2.8
4.0
Other independent power producers
9.8
10.7
Total net installed capacity in Italy
81.5
86.8
Source: Enel estimates.
*
Excluding stakes in former Gencos.
The main municipal electricity companies are AEM S.p.A. of
Milan, ACEA S.p.A. of Rome, AEM Torino S.p.A. and ASM Brescia
S.p.A. They are each publicly traded, but remain majority-owned
by the relevant municipality. In addition to their electricity
businesses, these companies offer gas and/or water services.
Electricity sales on the free market. For sales on the
free market, we compete with independent and other power
producers, importers, wholesalers and brokers. We expect
competition in the free market to increase further following the
Energy Authority’s decision to permit all non-residential
customers to qualify as Eligible Customers as of July 1,2004 and to allow residential customers access the market from
July 1, 2007.
Gas sales. In our natural gas business, we compete mainly
with Eni, the incumbent operator that historically held a
monopoly for natural gas distribution and sales activities in
Italy and continues to hold a significant majority of the
overall market for such activities. In 2005, our share of the
market for natural gas sales to end users, based on number of
customers served, was 10.5%.
The Italian gas market is currently going through a process of
liberalization. Please see “— Regulatory
Matters — Gas Regulation” for a discussion of the
regulation of the gas market.
Seasonality of Electricity and Gas Consumption
Electricity and gas consumption in Italy is somewhat seasonal.
Since use of artificial light is highest in winter, electricity
and gas consumption peaks during winter months. Nevertheless,
increased use of air conditioning has rendered less significant
the difference in electricity demand during winter versus summer
months, and increased use of natural gas for industrial
production has rendered less significant the difference in gas
demand during winter versus summer months. Electricity and gas
consumption is particularly low in August, the traditional
vacation period in Italy.
Discontinued Operations
In 2005 we discontinued the operations of our former
Telecommunications Division and Transmission Division, following
the deconsolidation of Wind and Terna, respectively, as a result
of our disposal of a controlling interest in these companies.
Our Telecommunications Division consisted of Wind and its
subsidiaries. Wind is a telecommunications company providing
mobile and fixed-line telephony, Internet and data transmission
services in Italy.
In line with our strategy of focusing on our core energy
operations, in May 2005 we entered into an agreement for the
sale of Wind to Weather Investments in a series of transactions.
Weather Investments is a private consortium headed by Naguib
Sawiris, who controls Orascom, an Egypt-based mobile phone
operator that provides telecommunications services in the Middle
East, Africa and Asia and is listed on the London Stock Exchange
and the Cairo and Alexandria Stock Exchange. On August 11,2005, we completed the first part of the transaction, which
consisted of our sale of a 62.75% stake in Wind to one of
Weather Investments’ subsidiaries for
€2,986 million
plus the acquisition by us of a 5.2% stake in Weather
Investments through our subscription to a
€305 million
capital increase. On February 8, 2006, we completed the
transaction by selling to one of Weather Investments’
subsidiaries an additional 6.28% stake in Wind for
€328 million,
and thereafter, transferring to Weather Investments the
remaining 30.97% stake in Wind in exchange for shares
representing 20.9% of Weather Investments’ share capital.
As a result of these transactions, we no longer have any direct
interest in Wind and we received an aggregate cash consideration
of
€3,009 million
and a 26.1% interest in Weather Investments. We view this
holding in Weather Investments solely as a financial investment.
In addition, we entered into a shareholders’ agreement with
Weather Investments II S.a.r.l., Weather Investments’
controlling shareholder, which provides for an initial public
offering of Weather Investments when market conditions are
favorable, and for both our and Weather Investments II
S.a.r.l.’s undertakings, subject to certain exceptions, not
to sell any share of Weather Investments before the initial
public offering. Moreover, the shareholders’ agreement
grants de facto consent rights to identified directors
(including directors designated by us) over certain transactions
taken by Weather Investments or its subsidiaries (for example,
transactions effected to incur additional indebtedness or to
sell certain material assets).
Transmission
We use the term “transmission” to refer to the
transport of electricity on high and very high voltage
interconnected networks from the plants where it is generated
(or, in the case of imported energy, from the points of
acquisition) to distribution systems.
Our Transmission Division consisted of Terna and its
subsidiaries. Terna owns a large majority of the Italian
national transmission grid. In light of Italian laws and
regulations that require the reunification of the ownership and
management of the Italian transmission grid and impose certain
restrictions on its ownership and management, we have disposed
of most of our interest in Terna retaining only 5.12% of its
share capital. In particular, in June 2004, we sold 50% of
Terna’s share capital in an initial public offering in
Italy and a private placement with certain institutional
investors that was not registered under the Securities Act (the
“Terna IPO”). In April 2005 we sold an additional
13.86% of Terna’s share capital in the context of a private
placement and in September 2005 an additional 29.99% to Cassa
Depositi e Prestiti. Finally, in January 2006, we distributed
1.02% of Terna’s share capital as “bonus” shares
that we had promised to certain Italian retail investors as part
of the Terna IPO. Please see “Item 5. Operating and
Financial Review and Prospects — Analysis of Operating
Results — Operationg Expenses — Income/ Loss
from Discontinued Operations —” and note 5
to consolidated financial statements for information on the
results of our telecommunications and transmission discontinued
operations.
Services and Other Activities
In line with our strategy of focusing on our core energy
operations, we divested certain of our non-core operations,
including real estate and water activities, and are refocusing
our remaining non-core operations on providing services to the
companies of our Group rather than third parties.
We set forth below a description of the other services and other
activities of the Group in 2005.
In accordance with our new core-business-oriented strategy, in
2004 we undertook a specific project aimed at centralizing
responsibility for all of our services and staff activities, as
well as improving quality and efficiency, including through the
creation of shared services. As part of this process, in January
2005 we merged our wholly owned services companies, Enel
Facility Management (real estate and other services) and Enel.it
(information technology) into Enel Servizi (formerly Enel Ape),
and transferred to Enel Servizi the Information &
Communication Technology (“ICT”) units of Enel
Produzione and of Enel Distribuzione.
In the first half of 2005, Enel Servizi became responsible for
the internal service and administration functions (and related
personnel) of the main Group companies. Moreover, Enel Servizi
provides information technology services for Group companies
and, in 2005, focused on certain strategic projects, including:
•
supporting Enel Distribuzione in completing the roll-out of the
Telemanagement system for remote metering; and
•
developing a disaster recovery system to enhance the stability
and performance of critical information technology applications.
Enel Servizi is also responsible for managing personnel
payrolls, pension funds and social security funds and providing
related administration services for Group companies. Finally,
Enel Servizi offers third parties services similar to that
provided to Group companies. In 2005, Enel Servizi recorded
revenues of approximately
€820 million,
of which approximately
€69 million
related to services provided to third parties.
Engineering and Construction
In 2004 and 2005, we conducted our engineering, procurement and
construction, or EPC, operations through Enelpower.
Enelpower served as the primary EPC contractor for our
Generation and Energy Management Division. Effective
January 1, 2006, EPC activities related to our Generation
and Energy Management Division were transferred to Enel
Produzione. Other than completing third-party projects to which
it had already committed, Enelpower does not provide services to
third-parties, either domestically or internationally in line
with our strategy of focusing on our core energy operations.
In 2005, Enelpower recorded revenues (including advances on
contract work in progress) of
€804 million,
approximately 37% of which was for third-party projects compared
to revenues of
€973 million
in 2004, approximately 64% of which was for third-party projects.
Real Estate and Other Services
On July 14, 2004, we sold the entire share capital of
NewReal, a company to which we had transferred real estate
assets, to a consortium formed by an investment fund belonging
to the Deutsche Bank group and CDC-IXIS for a total
consideration of
€1,400 million.
Before the closing of this transaction, NewReal transferred real
estate assets with a net book value of approximately
€384 million
to another of our real estate subsidiaries, Dalmazia Trieste.
At December 31, 2005, Dalmazia Trieste owned most of our
real estate assets, with a net book value of approximately
€695 million.
Our goal is to exploit the opportunities available with respect
to properties used by the Group and to divest all of the
Group’s residential properties by 2010.
Factoring
Our subsidiary Enel.factor is responsible for managing
receivables owned by third parties against companies of the
Group. In January 2005, we acquired 20% of Enel.factor’s
share capital from Meliorbanca, an Italian bank, for
approximately
€7 million,
becoming its sole shareholder.
Our subsidiary Sfera is responsible for providing professional
training services to our employees. In 2001, Sfera launched an
integrated remote training system for our employees (Enel
Distance Learning System), reaching 39,056 registered users at
the end of 2005. In 2005, Sfera provided a total of 74,252
“full-time equivalent” classroom days of instruction.
Water
In 2004, we continued with the divestiture of our water
activities, agreeing to sell our wholly owned subsidiary
Enel.Hydro S.p.A., which included our water initiatives in
Calabria and the province of Latina, and 20% of Idrosicilia
S.p.A., which operates large scale water transportation
activities in Sicily, to Compagnie Générale des Eaux
SCA (a subsidiary of Veolia Environnement) for approximately
€37 million.
These transactions closed on May 10, 2005. Enel and
Compagnie Générale des Eaux SCA also entered into a
put and call option agreement for the sale to the latter of our
remaining 40% stake in Idrosicilia S.p.A. We continue to own
Enel.NewHydro, a company we formed in June 2004, which holds a
51% interest in Wisco, a joint venture company we set up with
Trenitalia S.p.A. which is active in industrial waste water
purification.
Capital Investment Program
We have summarized in the table below our aggregate capital
expenditures on tangible and intangible assets by division
during each of 2004 and 2005. During these years, we have not
incurred significant capital expenditures with respect to
activities of our Corporate sector.
2004
2005
(In millions of
euro)
Generation and Energy Management
€857
€1,027
Sales, Infrastructure and Networks
1,711
1,692
Transmission
277
141
Telecommunications
867
287
Corporate and Others(1)
122
110
Total
€3,834
€3,257
(1)
In 2004 we did not incur capital expenditures with respect to
activities of our Corporate sector.
In 2005, we incurred total capital expenditures on tangible and
intangible assets in our core electricity generation, sales and
distribution businesses of
€2,719 million
(of which
€2,577 million
was spent on tangible assets). In 2005, during the period prior
to the deconsolidation of Wind and Terna, we incurred total
expenditures in our former telecommunications and transmission
businesses of
€287 million
and
€141 million,
respectively.
We have summarized in the table below our aggregate capital
expenditures on tangible assets by division during each of 2004
and 2005.
2004
2005
(In millions of
euro)
Generation and Energy Management
€842
€1,003
Sales, Infrastructure and Networks
1,632
1,574
Transmission
277
139
Telecommunications
680
251
Corporate and Others(1)
87
70
Total
€3,518
€3,037
(1)
In 2004 we have not incurred capital expenditures with respect
to activities of our Corporate sector.
For the period 2006-2010, we expect to incur capital
expenditures on tangible and intangible assets for the Enel
Group of approximately
€18.6 billion.
Of this total, we expect to incur capital expenditures of
approximately
€3,643 million
in 2006 and approximately
€4,168 million
in 2007. We expect to cover our capital expenditures in the
2006-2010 period with our cash flow from operations.
The following discussion analyzes in greater detail the capital
expenditures in 2005 of each of our divisions, focusing on
tangible assets, which are the most significant part of our
capital investments in our core electricity and gas operations.
Generation and Energy Management
In 2005, the Generation and Energy Management Division’s
capital expenditures on tangible assets were
€1,003 million,
an increase of
€161 million,
or 19.1%, from
€842 million
in 2004. Of the expenditures in 2005,
€990 million
were on the maintenance, upgrading and repowering of generation
plants, including
€768 million
in Italy and
€222 million
abroad. These expenditures included:
•
In Italy, the ongoing process of conversion of our approximately
1,900 MW oil-fired plant at Torrevaldaliga North to clean
coal technology, on which we spent approximately
€159 million
during the year, and of construction of fluidized bed combustion
facilities at a section of our power plant at Sulcis with
approximately 300 MW of net installed capacity, on which we
spent approximately
€54 million.
We also continued implementing our strategic plan to increase
investment in renewable generation facilities (wind,
hydroelectric, geothermal), spending approximately
€280 million
in 2005. Of this amount, we spent
€133 million
on capital improvements that we expect will allow us to comply
with regulations requiring us to provide a specified amount of
“green certificates” each year; and
•
In our international operations, the development of Uniņn
Fenosa’s generation facilities (approximately
€111 million),
the improvement of Enel Viesgo Generatiņn’s plants
(approximately
€51 million,
of which we invested
€32 million
in new projects), the Maritza East III’s ongoing plant
refurbishment project (approximately
€45 million),
Enel Latin America’s new projects (approximately
€12 million),
as well as regular maintenance and other minor expenditures to
improve the capacity, efficiency and productivity of plants in
North America (approximately
€5 million).
Overall, our Generation and Energy Management Division, which
effective as of January 1, 2006 no longer includes our
international generation operations (which now form part of our
new International Division) expects to invest approximately
€6,800 million
on tangible and intangible assets in the 2006-2010 period. We
expect to make approximately
€4,300 million
of our expenditures on tangible assets on the ongoing
implementation of our program to convert oil-fired thermal
generation plants to CCGT or to burn coal. In particular:
•
For CCGT conversions, we have completed the conversion of
approximately 4,300 MW and plan to continue the CCGT
conversion program, with the most significant projects at our
Santa Barbara and Termini Imerese power plants (for
approximately 750 MW); and
•
For coal conversions, we plan to continue the conversions of our
thermal generation plants at Torrevaldaliga North, finish our
trial phase in Sulcis, and begin similar conversions of certain
other power generation units, expected to affect in the
aggregate approximately 4,100 MW of net installed capacity.
The conversion plans for approximately 1,900 MW of this
amount are still subject to regulatory approval.
We also plan to invest approximately
€1,300 million
in the 2006-2010 period on developing generation from renewable
resources.
See “Capital Expenditures for the International Division
in the 2006-2010 period” below for a description of the
capital expenditures we have planned with regard to
international distribution and sales for the 2006-2010 period.
Sales, Infrastructure and Networks
Capital expenditures on tangible assets in our Sales,
Infrastructure and Networks Division (which we have split into a
Market Division and an Infrastructure and Networks Division)
decreased 3.6% to
€1,574 million
in
2005, from
€1,632 million
in 2004. Capital expenditures on our Italian electricity
distribution networks decreased 5.2% to
€1,319 million
in 2005, from
€1,391 million
in 2004, reflecting more selective investing in quality
improvements in light of the service continuity levels already
achieved. Amounts spent on our distribution network in 2005
included approximately
€464 million
relating to our “Telemanagement” digital meter
project. Please see “— The Enel Group —
Sales, Infrastructure and Networks — Domestic
Distribution and Sales Operations — Telemanagement
System.” In 2005, we installed 6.2 million additional
meters, bringing the total number of meters installed at
December 31, 2005, to approximately 27 million (of an
expected total of approximately 30.8 million), of which
approximately 25 million were already remotely connected to
our system. We expect that the Telemanagement project, for which
we expect installation of the new meters to be largely completed
by the end of 2006, to entail total investments of approximately
€2,200 million.
We plan to invest approximately
€5,857 million
in tangible assets
(€6,570 million
including intangible assets) in our electricity and natural gas
sales and distribution businesses in Italy and abroad in the
2006-2010 period. Of this amount, we expect to invest
approximately
€2,209 million
in promoting new customer connections in our electricity
business. We also expect to make investments in our electricity
network of approximately
€1,215 million
to improve service quality, so that we may continue to exceed
the targets established by the Energy Authority in those areas
in which we are exceeding them, and improve our performance in
those areas in which we are not. We expect to invest
approximately
€731 million
in improving load factor and plant safety, of which we plan to
invest
€624 million
in the Telemanagement integrated system. We also plan to invest
approximately
€338 million
in developing our natural gas distribution networks, primarily
in new pipelines built either in response to customer requests
or as part of our business development policies, as well as in
improving the quality of our gas service levels and plant safety.
Our Market Division and Infrastructure and Networks Division
plan to continue their capital expenditures in information
technology, in particular on a new, more customer-friendly
billing system and to implement internal resource planning
software to improve the efficiency of both our distribution
activities and our accounting system.
In 2005, Electra de Viesgo Distribuciņn SL made capital
expenditures on tangible assets of
€56 million,
primarily to upgrade its distribution network in compliance with
regulatory requirements. During 2005, we made capital
expenditures of
€12 million
on on tangible assets in Romania, primarily to improve our
distribution network.
See “Capital Expenditures for the International Division
in the 2006-2010 period” below for our planned capital
expenditures, in the 2006-2010 period, on international
distribution and sales operations that are now included in our
new International Division.
Services and Other Activities
With respect to our non-core businesses, we incurred total
capital expenditures on tangible and intangible assets of
approximately
€99 million
in 2005, as compared to
€112 million
in 2004, and expect to incur similar total capital expenditures
on tangible and non-tangible assets in 2006.
Transmission and Telecommunications
All capital expenditures on tangible and intangible assets
related to Wind and Terna
(€287 million
and
€141 million
in 2005, respectively, as compared to
€867 million
and
€277 million
in 2004), refer to the period prior to our deconsolidation of
these companies following the disposal of our controlling
interest in them. Please see
“— Business — The Enel
Group — Discontinued Operations” for additional
information.
Capital Expenditures for the International Division in the
2006-2010 period
In the 2006-2010 period, we plan to spend approximately
€4,808 million
on our international operations, of which we plan to spend
€4,191 million
on our international generation operations and
€617 million
on our international distribution and sales operations.
International generation operations. In the 2006 through
2010 period, Enel Viesgo Generaciņn expects to invest
approximately
€1,334 million,
primarily to implement a program to convert certain of its coal
plants to
CCGT. In addition, during the same period, we expect to spend
€709 million
on further development of our generation capacity from renewable
resources at EUFR,
€228 million
at Maritza East III in Bulgaria, primarily to complete its
ongoing plant refurbishment program, and an aggregate of
€106 in North
America and South America for the development of two new
hydroelectric plants in Guatemala, which we expect to become
operational between 2006-2009, and on geothermal exploration
activities in Chile. Finally, SE expects to invest approximately
€1,812 million
during the 2006-2010 period,
€1,162 million
of which it plans to spend on the construction of a new nuclear
power plant.
International distribution and sales operations. In the
2006 through 2010 period, Electra de Viesgo Distribuciņn SL
is planning to make capital expenditures of approximately
€276 million
to improve service performance and network safety, and to
implement its own digital meter project. In the same period, we
expect to invest approximately
€326 million,
in line with the plan authorized by the Romanian Authority
(ANRE) for the years 2005-2007, in order to improve the
quality and the efficiency of our distribution network in
Romania.
Regulatory Matters
Overview of Regulation in the Energy Sector in Italy
The Ministry of Productive Activities and the Energy Authority
share responsibility for overall supervision and regulation of
the Italian energy sector, comprising both electricity and gas.
The Ministry of Productive Activities is responsible for
establishing the strategic guidelines for the energy sector and
for ensuring the safety and economic soundness of the
electricity and gas sectors.
The Energy Authority is responsible for:
•
setting and adjusting tariffs on the basis of general criteria
established by law;
•
advising the Ministry of Productive Activities on the
structuring and administration of licensing and authorization
regimes for the energy sector;
•
ensuring the quality of services provided to customers;
•
overseeing the separation of utility companies into distinct
units for accounting and management purposes;
•
promoting competition; and
•
otherwise protecting the interests of consumers, including the
authority to mediate disputes between utilities and consumers,
and to impose sanctions for violations of regulations.
The EU also takes an active role in energy regulation by means
of its legislative powers, as well as investigations and other
action by the European Commission.
Electricity Regulation
The regulatory framework for the Italian electricity sector has
changed significantly in recent years pursuant to the
implementation through the Bersani Decree of the December 1996
EU Electricity Directive.
The Bersani Decree, which entered into force on April 1,1999, began the liberalization of the electricity sector through
the separation of generation, transmission and distribution
activities and the gradual introduction of free competition in
power generation and sales to consumers meeting certain
consumption thresholds, while maintaining a regulated monopoly
structure for power transmission, distribution and sales to the
other customers. In particular, the Bersani Decree, among other
things,
•
liberalized, as of April 1, 1999, the generation, import
and export of electricity;
•
provided that consumers, or Eligible Customers, meeting certain
consumption thresholds, which have been progressively reduced,
may negotiate supply agreements directly with any domestic or
foreign producer, wholesaler or distributor of electricity,
while other, “Non-Eligible Customers” must continue to
purchase electricity from the distributor serving the area in
which they are located and pay regulated prices determined by
the Energy Authority;
•
provided that after January 1, 2003, no electricity company
may produce or import more than 50% of the total of imported and
domestically produced electricity in Italy, which limit resulted
in our sale of the Gencos;
•
provided for the establishment of the Single Buyer, a central
purchaser of electricity from producers on behalf of all
Non-Eligible Customers;
•
provided for the creation of the Italian power exchange, a
virtual marketplace in which producers, importers, wholesalers,
the GRTN, other Eligible Customers and the Single Buyer buy and
sell electricity at prices determined through a competitive
bidding process;
•
provided for the creation of a Market Operator to manage the
Italian power exchange;
•
provided for the separation of management and operation of the
national electricity transmission grid, which was to be licensed
to an independent transmission system operator, the GRTN, from
ownership of the grid assets, which were retained by existing
owners, primarily Terna; and
•
established a new licensing regime for electricity distribution
and provided incentives for the consolidation of electricity
distribution networks within each municipality.
The Bersani Decree was amended following the enactment of a law
in October 2003 that provided, among other things, for the
reunification of management and operation of the national
transmission grid with its ownership under a single private
entity. Pursuant to an implementing decree enacted in May 2004,
on November 1, 2005 responsibility to manage the national
transmission grid and the related assets was transferred from
the GRTN to Terna, although the GRTN retained its other
responsibilities. Following this transfer, no electricity
operator, including us, is entitled to voting rights in excess
of 5% with respect to the appointment of Terna’s directors.
In addition, the implementing decree required us to reduce our
holding in Terna to no more than 20% by July 1, 2007.
Accordingly, we have reduced our holding to 5.12%.
In 2003, the EU adopted a new directive and a related regulation
to further liberalize the electricity market. The new
Electricity Directive, which replaced the 1996 Electricity
Directive, enables all consumers to freely choose their supplier
by 2007, irrespective of consumption levels, with all
non-household consumers enjoying this right of choice from 2004.
Further, the new Electricity Directive introduces new
definitions of public service obligations and security of
supply, establishes a regulator in all EU member states with
well-defined functions, and, finally, requires legal unbundling
of network activities from generation and supply. The related EU
regulation establishes common rules for the cross-border trade
in electricity in the EU, laying down principles on charges to
be paid as a result of transit flows and access to networks as
well as on congestion management. EU member states were required
to implement the new directive by July 1, 2004, and Italy
did so partly through the Marzano Law, which is discussed below.
On September 28, 2004, the Marzano Law (so named after the
then-Minister of Productive Activities, Antonio Marzano), a law
aimed at reorganizing existing energy market regulation and
further liberalizing the natural gas and electricity markets,
took effect. Among other things, the Marzano Law aims to clarify
the respective roles of the Italian central government, regional
and local authorities, and the Energy Authority. The Marzano Law
also seeks to facilitate investments in the energy sector. To
further liberalize the market, and consistent with the new
Electricity Directive, the Marzano Law provides that all
customers will be eligible to purchase electricity on the free
market from July 1, 2007, although the law provides that
the Single Buyer will nonetheless continue to supply electricity
to consumers who choose not to leave the regulated market.
The Marzano Law also authorized the Italian government to limit
the ability of companies based in other EU member states to
invest in the Italian energy sector if their home country did
not adequately guarantee a reciprocal ability for Italian
companies to invest in its energy market. The Italian government
had already approved such a measure in 2001, which limited the
ability of EDF to exercise its voting rights with respect to the
stake it held in Italenergia Bis S.p.A., the controlling
shareholder of Edison. In June 2005, the European Court of
Justice ruled that this limitation was contrary to EU law.
However, the Italian government lifted the limitation
before the European Court of Justice issued its judgment.
Accordingly, in July, 2005 EDF and AEM took control of Edison.
Certain provisions of the Marzano Law concerning the allocation
of powers between the Italian national and regional government
have been challenged before the Italian Constitutional Court. In
2005, the Constitutional Court rejected an action brought by the
Italian Region of Tuscany for interference by the national
government with the regional government’s authority. The
national government has also challenged a law passed by the
Tuscany government for interference with the national
government’s authority in the field of competition and
regulation. A decision by the Constitutional Court on this
matter is expected in the second half of 2006. Please see
“Item 3. Key Information — Risk
Factors — Risks Relating to our Energy
Business — We are dependent on government concessions
for our electricity and gas distribution businesses.”
In June 2005, the European Commission launched an inquiry into
the effects of the regulatory measures that have been adopted
which show that progress in achieving a truly integrated energy
market has been slow. According to the preliminary findings
released in February 2006, market concentration, vertical
foreclosure, lack of market integration, lack of transparency
and price formation are the five main barriers to a fully
functioning internal energy market. While the final report will
be published at the end of 2006, the Commission has already
indicated that it intends to carry out antitrust investigations
in light of the inquiry’s conclusions. Moreover, in April
2006, the Commission started proceedings against certain Member
States, including Italy, for failure to adequately enact EU
legislation.
Eligible and Non-Eligible Customers
One of the most important features of the regulatory framework
is the distinction between Eligible Customers and Non-Eligible
Customers. All customers that do not qualify as Eligible
Customers are considered Non-Eligible Customers.
Eligible Customers may enter into bilateral contracts for the
supply of energy at freely negotiated prices directly with any
domestic or foreign producer or reseller, or, since
January 1, 2005, buy electricity directly on the power
exchange. Resellers, including our subsidiaries Enel Energia and
Enel Trade, may buy electricity for resale to Eligible Customers
from any producer or on the power exchange.
Non-Eligible Customers may purchase electricity only from the
distribution company serving the geographic area in which they
are located, at tariffs set by the Energy Authority.
Distributors who transport electricity to the regulated market
must in turn purchase the electricity so distributed from the
Single Buyer, also at purchase prices fixed by the Energy
Authority. Please see “— The Tariff
Structure” for additional information on the electricity
tariff system in Italy.
The consumption threshold for qualification as an Eligible
Customer, which is set by regulation, is decreasing over time,
reducing the number of customers who must buy electricity on the
regulated market. The consumption threshold in January 2002 was
9 GWh or more of electricity per year, declining on May 1,2003, to 0.1 GWh per year, which resulted in approximately 60%
of our electricity customers becoming eligible to participate in
the free market.
In accordance with the new 2003 Electricity Directive, the
Energy Authority on June 30, 2004, recognized all
non-residential customers, or approximately 7 million
consumers, as Eligible Customers as of July 1, 2004,
permitting them to take part in the free market from that date
if they so choose. From July 1, 2007, all customers,
including residential customers, will be eligible to purchase
electricity on the free market.
Eligible Customers who choose not to participate on the free
market will continue to purchase electricity from their local
distributor on the regulated market under conditions set by the
Energy Authority. The law also provides that even after all
customers have become Eligible Customers, the Single Buyer will
continue to supply electricity to distributors for resale to
their customers who choose not to leave the regulated market.
The Single Buyer, a corporation formed in 1999 and wholly owned
by the GRTN, is responsible for ensuring the efficient, adequate
and non-discriminatory supply of electricity to Non-Eligible
Customers until they are allowed to freely choose their
supplier. The Single Buyer became operational on January 1,2004. Electricity distribution companies, including us, may take
stakes of up to 10% in the Single Buyer, although the GRTN must
remain the majority shareholder.
Based on its own periodic estimates of future electricity demand
and Ministry of Productive Activities guidelines, the Single
Buyer purchases all electricity for the regulated market from us
and other domestic and foreign producers. All distribution
companies, including ours, are required to purchase electricity
to be distributed on the regulated market from the Single Buyer.
The Single Buyer may purchase electricity on the power exchange,
through bilateral contracts (including “contracts for
differences,” as described below) with domestic and foreign
producers, or from the GRTN, which resells the electricity it is
required to purchase under the CIP 6 regime.
The Single Buyer held an auction in March 2004 for contracts for
the physical delivery of a total of 4,800 MW of electricity
to be supplied to customers on the regulated market for the
period from April 1, 2004 through December 31, 2004.
Producers bid for these contracts on the basis of percentage
discounts from a base price. Under these contracts, winning
bidders were awarded their discounted bid price, plus a fixed
component aimed at covering the cost of fuel. In these auctions,
we were awarded physical delivery contracts for approximately
3,620 MW of electricity purchased by the Single Buyer (or
approximately 75% of the total amount awarded).
In 2004 and 2005, the Single Buyer also held a series of
auctions for “contracts for differences,” which are
financial derivative contracts used to hedge the price risk of
operations on the power exchange. These contracts establish a
reference price, or “strike” price for a specified
quantity of electricity, which the Single Buyer then purchases
on the power exchange at the market price. In 2004, these
contracts were “two-way”contracts for differences:
when the market price paid by Single Buyer was higher than the
strike price, the counterparty would pay the Single Buyer an
amount equal to the difference, while when the market price was
lower than the strike price, the Single Buyer would pay the
counterparty the difference. In 2005, Single Buyer has offered
only “one-way”contracts, under which the counterparty
still pays the Single Buyer any excess of the market price for
its electricity purchases over the strike price, while the
Single Buyer instead pays the counterparty a contractually set
premium.
For the year 2004, we were awarded contracts for differences
with the Single Buyer covering approximately 28 TWh (equal to
approximately 70% of the total amount awarded). For the year
2005, the Single Buyer held auctions for contracts for
differences in December 2004 and January 2005 with respect to a
total of approximately 19,500 MW of electricity; we won
approximately 12,500 MW of the final amount awarded. These
contracts give us the right to extend their duration at our
option, a right which we exercised in May 2005. As a
consequence, we will supply to the Single Buyer 6,660 MW
until December 31, 2006 and 5,550 MW until
December 31, 2007. Under new auctions held by the Single
Buyer in October and November 2005, we were awarded
“two-ways”contracts for differences for the supply of
3,300 MW in 2006.
The total payments by the Single Buyer to electricity producers
for its purchases of electricity, either through bilateral
contracts or on the power exchange, plus its own operating
costs, must equal the total revenues it earns from sales to the
regulated market under the regulated tariff structure. As a
consequence, the Energy Authority may adjust tariffs from time
to time to reflect the prices actually paid by the Single Buyer,
as well as other factors.
The Italian Power Exchange
The Italian power exchange, a virtual marketplace for the spot
trading of electricity by producers and consumers under the
management of the Market Operator, started operations on
April 1, 2004.
In the initial phase of the power exchange, from April 1,2004, through December 31, 2004, the GRTN, based on its own
estimates of aggregate electricity demand, placed bids on the
power exchange on behalf of all consumers who had not fully
satisfied their demand through bilateral contracts. Since
January 1, 2005, Eligible Customers have been able to
participate directly in bidding for electricity on the power
exchange.
The power exchange is organized into three different markets in
order to ensure a steady supply of electricity — the
“day-ahead” market, the “adjustment market”
and the “ancillary service” market.
In the day-ahead market, sellers and buyers submit bids and
offers for electricity to be supplied on the day following the
transaction under the supervision of the Market Operator. The
Market Operator is responsible for matching electricity demand
and supply and, consequently, for the definition of power
injection (supply) and withdrawal
(demand) schedules and for communicating these schedules to
the transmission system operator, currently Terna, which is
responsible for physical delivery of energy. Variations in the
schedules agreed upon in the “day-ahead” market are
negotiated through an “adjustment market.” In the
“day-ahead” market and in the “adjustment
market,” a market-clearing price (the “system marginal
price”) at which all transactions must take place is set by
the Market Operator on the basis of an aggregation of all bids
and offers, starting, respectively, from the highest bid and the
lowest offer. In addition, the Market Operator must also take
into account physical network limitations which place
constraints on the transport power from particular generation
facilities to consumers and may result in market congestion.
If there is no market congestion, the Market Operator is able to
set one system marginal price throughout Italy. However, if
market congestion occurs, the Market Operator may divide the
market into various zones, in which different system marginal
prices may be set. In such event, the Market Operator will still
determine one national price for purchasers on the power
exchange, called the “unified national price,” based
on a weighted average of the different system marginal prices
set in the various zones. Suppliers, however, will receive the
system marginal price that is applicable in their zone. In order
to ensure that all producers in a congested zone bear the costs
associated with the congestion, Terna will impose on suppliers
who have produced electricity under bilateral contracts within a
zone a congestion fee equal to the price differential between
the applicable system marginal price in that producer’s
zone and the unified national price.
In the ancillary service market, producers submit bids and
offers to Terna to increase (or decrease) the volume of energy
to be supplied (or withdrawn) in order to permit the real-time
balancing of supply and demand required for the physical
delivery of electricity. Terna also procures reserve production
capacity through the ancillary service market by accepting bids
from producers willing to guarantee availability of reserve
power. Transactions on the ancillary service market also serve
to help manage network congestion that results when physical
delivery schedules agreed upon in the day-ahead and adjustment
markets are incompatible with network constraints. In the
ancillary service market, prices are determined on the basis of
individual negotiations between producers and Terna, or on a
“pay-as-bid” basis.
The Energy Authority and the Antitrust Authority constantly
monitor the power exchange to ensure that it delivers the
expected results: improved competition between electricity
producers and enhancement of the efficiency of the Italian
electricity system.
In February 2005, the Energy Authority and Antitrust Authority
issued a joint report on the state of the liberalization process
of the Italian electricity sector in which, among other things,
we were found to be in a position to set wholesale electricity
prices throughout Italy, except in Sardinia (where Endesa holds
a similar power). On May 5, 2005, the Energy Authority
proposed certain possible measures to further promote
competition in the wholesale electricity market over the next
few years. The proposals include measures to reduce the
structural power of operators in the market and disincentives to
electricity producers to seek to exercise market power, in
particular with respect to prices. Among the structural measures
proposed are the required sale by us of additional power plants
(on top of the 15,000 MW of productive capacity we have
already sold through the disposal of the Gencos), or the
required lease by us to third parties of generating capacity, as
well as the partial entrusting to the Terna of the management of
certain power plants deemed essential to cover demand for
electricity, and hence whose production is a significant
determinant of the wholesale price of electricity. The proposed
disincentives to the exercise of market power include certain
price cap mechanisms and the imposition of a requirement that
producers enter into two-way contracts for differences or
“Virtual Power Plant”contracts
(“VPP”), in either case at predetermined quantities
and at regulated prices. VPPs are contracts similar to contracts
for differences that give the buyer the right, when the market
price is higher than the contract price, to request from the
seller an amount equal to the difference between the market and
contract prices. Following these proposals, in the last quarter
of 2005, the Energy Authority required us to enter into VPP
contracts for 2006. Furthermore, the Energy Autority decided
that the functioning of plants that provide energy for pumping
water into hydroelectric power production facilities should be
regulated. These measures were reversed by an Italian
administrative court on February 6, 2006.
In April 2005, the Energy Authority officially concluded that
two cases of price spikes on the power exchange, one in June
2004 and one in January 2005, may not have been the result of
underlying market conditions, and instead may have been caused
by violations of antitrust law by us. As a result, the Antitrust
Authority opened an investigation into these alleged violations
and the surrounding events, which is due to be completed by
November 15, 2006.
For more information on these matters, please see
“Item 3. Key Information — Risk
Factors — Risks Relating to our Energy
Business — We have been and are subject to regulatory
investigations, including for possible abuse of dominant
position and market abuse” and “Item 8. Financial
Information — Other Financial Information —
Legal Proceedings.”
Imports
The volume of electricity that can be imported into Italy is
limited by the capacity of transmission lines that connect the
Italian grid with those of other countries and by concerns
relating to the security of the system. Currently, a maximum
import capacity of approximately 7,690 MW is available to
import energy safely. A law passed in 2003 provides incentives
to the development of new transmission infrastructures.
In 2005, we controlled approximately 2,000 MW of the total
import capacity pursuant to two long-term supply contracts.
Since April 1, 2004, the date on which the power exchange
started operations, we sell the electricity imported pursuant to
these contracts to the Single Buyer under terms set by
Ministerial Decree.
Until December, 31 2005 the energy we purchased under these
long-term supply contracts enjoyed priority access to
interconnection capacity for transmission of electricity into
Italy from neighboring countries, for up to 2000 MW.
However, in 2006, the French regulatory authority decided not to
assign to us any transmission or any reserved capacity for our
import of the electricity we purchased under a long-term
contract with EDF. As a consequence, only part of the
electricity bought under this contract was imported into Italy,
with the remaining part being sold in France. We have appealed
the decision of the French regulatory authority before the
competent administrative court. Moreover, in April 2006, the
European Commission started proceedings against certain Member
States, including Italy, challenging priority access for
long-term supply contracts. If the European Commission concludes
that such rights are contrary to EU law, our ability to import
electricity under these contracts will be impaired and we will
be forced to sell the electricity under this contract outside of
Italy or pay for congestion rights that will give us access to
transmission facilities to import this energy. The impact of
this measure or any other measure adopted further to a decision
by the European Commission that priority access rights are
contrary to EU law would be in any event limited, as the
contract with EDF expires in 2007 and the revenues derived from
the other contract (which expires in 2012) are not material.
The Bersani Decree authorized the Ministry of Productive
Activities to set terms and conditions to allocate the
interconnection capacity available after deducting the capacity
used by existing long-term contracts, taking into account a fair
allocation of the generally less expensive imported electricity
between the free and regulated markets if import demand exceeds
total interconnection capacity.
The allocation mechanism for 2004 set out by the Ministry of
Productive Activities in accordance with EU law and applied by
the Energy Authority and the GRTN considered the total
interconnection capacity available at the borders with France
and Switzerland (the north-west pool) and Austria and Slovenia
(the north-east pool) separately. Interconnection capacity was
allocated on a pro-rata basis; in addition, in no case may a
single importer hold more than 10% of the interconnection
capacity available in any given pool. The Ministry of Productive
Activities put a new allocation mechanism into effect for 2005.
Under the new mechanism, capacity is
allocated pursuant to an implicit auction mechanism, with the
price to be paid for access to this capacity determined based on
the price in the power exchange’s “day-ahead
market” (please see “— The Italian Power
Exchange,” above). Because of the link to prices on the
power exchange, this mechanism may result in higher price
volatility for, and an increase in the cost of, imported
electricity. As a result, the Energy Authority has also
established a mechanism to provide purchasers of imported
electricity with an exemption from congestion charges. In 2005,
this exemption was awarded by the GRTN on a pro-rata basis in
the event applications exceed the total available quantity. In
2006, the exemption was allocated through an auction.
Incentives to Provide Generation Capacity
In order to address a current deficit in Italian generation
capacity relative to rising electricity demand, the regulatory
framework provides incentives to power generators both to build
new capacity as well as to maintain their existing plants in
good working order and available to cover sudden variations in
electricity demand.
In 2004, the Energy Authority established a provisional system
of payments to remunerate producers that make generation
capacity available to the electricity system at times of peak
demand, known as “capacity payments.” Capacity
payments to a given producer comprise both an amount due for
capacity available on “critical” days, which was
previously set by the GRTN and is now set by Terna, and a
further amount payable when pool market prices fall below
specified thresholds, as an extra incentive. This provisional
mechanism remains in place. The Energy Authority is currently
developing the definitive mechanism, which by law must be
market-based and also provide incentives for new generation
capacity.
New Generation Plants
In order to promote investment in new generation facilities, the
October 2003 law amending the Bersani Decree included provisions
to streamline the authorization procedures relating to the
construction of new power generation plants and the renovation
and expansion of existing plants.
The Marzano Law requires all entities receiving authorization to
construct new plants or to increase generating capacity of
existing power plants after September 28, 2004, to pay the
authorities of the region in which the plant is located
compensation (based on generating capacity) for the lost
alternative use of the plant site and the impact thereof on
surrounding communities, unless the parties agree otherwise.
Transmission
As noted, we use the term “transmission” to refer to
the transport of electricity on high and very high voltage
interconnected networks from the plants where it is generated
or, in the case of imported energy, from the points of
acquisition, to distribution systems. The Italian national
electricity transmission grid includes all of Terna’s very
high voltage (380/220 kV) and high voltage (150/132 kV) lines.
In accordance with a law passed in 2003 that required the
reunification of ownership and management of the grid, we no
longer control Terna following our disposal of a controlling
stake in this company. Please see
“— Business — The Enel
Group — Discontinued Operations” for additional
information.
Distribution of Electricity
As noted, we use the term “distribution” to refer to
the transport of electricity from the transmission grid to end
users of electricity.
Distribution companies in Italy are required to be licensed by
the state and to provide service to all customers who request
it, subject to payment of applicable tariffs and to compliance
with technical and safety requirements. In addition,
distributors serving more than 300,000 customers must distribute
electricity to the regulated market through separate companies
whose sale activity is the distribution and sale of electricity
on the regulated market.
Our concessions for the distribution of electricity are
scheduled to expire in 2032.
The Bersani Decree sought to promote the consolidation of the
Italian electricity distribution industry by providing for the
issuance of only one distribution license within each
municipality and establishing procedures to consolidate
distribution activities under a single operator in
municipalities where both we and a local distribution company
were engaged in electricity distribution by giving municipal
networks the right to request that we sell our distribution
network in their municipalities to them.
Substantially all of the qualifying distribution companies in
municipalities with co-existing networks made requests to
purchase our networks in those cities. For more details on the
consolidation process, please see
“— Business — The Enel
Group — Sales, Infrastructure and Networks —
Domestic Distribution and Sales Operations —
Consolidation of Electricity Distribution Networks.”
On average, the distribution networks that we have been required
to sell were more profitable than our other distribution
networks, mainly because distribution in metropolitan areas has
lower costs. In 2004, the Energy Authority put in place an
equalization system to compensate distributors for the higher
costs associated with serving non-urban areas. However, the
compensation system does not apply to Enel Distribuzione. Please
see “— The Tariff Structure” below.
The Tariff Structure
Prices paid by all Italian customers for electricity include a
transmission component, a distribution component, a generation
component covering the price of the electricity itself and
system charges.
Under the current electricity tariff regime, all customers pay
regulated prices, set either directly by the Energy Authority or
in accordance with Energy Authority guidelines and subject to
its approval, for the transmission and distribution components
and system charges. The transmission and distribution
components, together referred to as “transport
charges,” are subject to a price cap mechanism aimed at
progressively reducing these charges on the basis of annual
efficiency targets. For customers purchasing electricity on the
regulated market, the Energy Authority also regulates the
generation component, which is set on a quarterly basis, while
customers purchasing electricity on the free market pay prices
agreed through bilateral contracts or on the power exchange.
The Energy Authority sets base tariff levels every four years.
In setting the base tariff levels, the Energy Authority takes
into account:
•
Operating costs of generation (for electricity prices on the
regulated market), transmission and distribution activities,
including procurement costs, and amortization and depreciation.
In order for operators to be able to recover particular costs,
the costs must be both actually incurred by them and recognized
by the Energy Authority;
•
An appropriate return on invested capital, including both equity
and debt financing; and
•
The costs associated with system charges.
In 2004, the Energy Authority set new base tariffs for the
2004-2007 period, which have been in force since
February 1, 2004. The Energy Authority has estimated that
the new tariff regime in place for 2004-2007 will result in a
reduction of the overall tariff paid by regulated market
customers of approximately 13% in real terms (assuming no change
in fuel costs and system charges) during the period.
The actual impact of tariff levels on our revenues depends on a
number of factors, including the volume of electricity we sell
in the regulated market, fuel prices and the mix of customers we
serve.
The tariff structure currently in place also includes certain
mechanisms to take into account structural factors affecting
distributors’ costs.
The Energy Authority in 2004 established a price equalizing
mechanism intended to minimize the effects of a timing
discrepancy in the setting of prices distributors pay to the
Single Buyer for electricity to be distributed on the regulated
market and the prices that distributors may charge to end users
on the regulated market. The prices distributors pay to the
Single Buyer for electricity to be distributed on the regulated
market are set monthly by the Energy Authority based on the
average unit costs incurred by the Single Buyer in connection
with its purchases of
electricity. However, the generation component included in the
overall tariff that distributors may charge to end users on the
regulated market is fixed by the Energy Authority on a quarterly
basis, as explained in more detail below. In order to minimize
the effects of this discrepancy, the Energy Authority has
established a price equalizing mechanism applicable for the
first time in 2004. The equalizing mechanism is funded through a
system charge in an amount set by the Energy Authority,
applicable starting in 2005.
In 2004, the Energy Authority also put in place a system to
compensate distributors that serve areas where costs are
significantly higher than the national average due to
uncontrollable factors such as population density and geography.
The costs to be taken into account in setting this compensation
are to be based on infrastructural elements such as length of
cables and installation type (aerial or underground). The
compensation system does not apply to Enel Distribuzione, but it
applies to our subsidiary Deval, which has requested
approximately
€2.4 million
as compensation. A preliminary decision by the Energy Authority
on this matter has granted Deval
€1.1 million
as compensation. We expect the Energy Authority to issue a final
decision on this matter in the second half of 2006.
The Energy Authority currently defines the following six tariff
categories of electricity consumers:
The Energy Authority has been seeking to introduce a new tariff
system designed to protect disadvantaged residential customers.
However, this system has not yet been formally proposed or
approved.
Generation Component of Electricity Tariffs
The generation component refers to the price paid by customers
for electricity sold on the regulated market. Prior to the start
of the power exchange on April 1, 2004, the Energy
Authority determined generation costs based on fixed and
variable components of production costs. The fixed-cost
component, which was intended to reflect non-fuel operating
costs, was based on an estimate of the average recognized fixed
costs associated with generation plants in Italy and was set on
annual basis.
The variable-cost component of the tariffs was principally
intended to reflect fuel costs associated with thermal power
generation. This system resulted in an increase in the relative
profitability of:
•
Hydroelectric or geothermal generation, since these plants do
not incur fuel costs; and
•
The resale of electricity imported under long-term contracts in
effect as of the date of the entry into force of the first
Electricity Directive on February 19, 1997, which was
frequently cheaper than electricity generated in Italy.
The Energy Authority decided to reduce this potential windfall
profit for hydroelectric or geothermal producers by establishing
a new surcharge to be paid by these producers to the GRTN with
respect to electricity sold by them. This surcharge applied
until December 2001. Pursuant to rules on stranded costs enacted
in 2002 (which are described in more detail below), the
surcharge on hydroelectric and geothermal generation was
abolished as of January 1, 2002.
In February 2004, the Energy Authority modified the price
electricity producers were permitted to charge to distributors
for the electricity to be supplied to regulated customers in
order to reduce the component of electricity tariffs related to
generation during March 2004. We and other electricity operators
challenged this reduction before the Administrative Tribunal of
Lombardy, which annulled the Energy Authority decision. The
Council of State, however, overruled this decision on
January 16, 2006. Accordingly, we are required to
reimburse consumers approximately
€200 million,
which is the difference between the price paid by regulated
customers for the electricity supplied in March 2004 and the
amount resulting from implementation of the reduction mandated
by the Energy Authority.
Since April 1, 2004, the Energy Authority sets the
generation cost component of the electricity tariff paid by
customers on the regulated market every three months on the
basis of the average costs incurred by the Single Buyer for the
procurement of electricity, both on the power exchange and
directly from producers.
We sell electricity on the free market through bilateral
contracts at prices that are negotiated with each customer and
that may vary based on several elements, such as quantity
purchased, type of electricity sold and duration of the
contract; electricity sold on the power exchange is sold at the
price determined through the relevant market mechanism. Please
see “— The Italian Power Exchange” above for
additional details on these mechanisms.
Transmission and Distribution Components
As noted above, the regulated tariff for transmission and
distribution services, or transport charges, for all customers
takes into account both the operating costs of transmission and
distribution activities, including procurement costs, and
amortization and depreciation, as well as an appropriate return
on invested capital. In order for operators to be able to
recover particular costs, the costs must be both actually
incurred by them and recognized by the Energy Authority. The
transmission component of the transport charges is currently set
by the Energy Authority. As explained in more detail below,
distributors may propose various price options for both
residential and non-residential customers, within guidelines set
by, and subject to the approval of, the Energy Authority.
The costs of transmission and distribution companies used in
determining transport charges are subject to a price-cap
mechanism. During the 2000-2003 period, the Energy Authority set
the annual rate of reduction with respect to total costs
(capital costs, depreciation and operating costs) in real terms
at 4% for each of the transmission and distribution components.
For the period 2004-2007, the Energy Authority has set the
annual percentage decrease only for operating costs and
depreciation, but excluding capital costs, for transmission and
distribution services at 2.5% and 3.5%, respectively.
For distributors, the determination of operating costs is
required to reflect the average costs incurred by the main
distributors for the transport of electricity through the local
distribution networks and for the sales-related services they
provide to final customers, plus a specified return on invested
capital. The return on capital recognized by the Energy
Authority for the 2004-2007 period was set at 6.8% for
distribution networks and at 6.7% for transmission networks, or
a higher percentage for capital invested in transmission network
development.
Depreciation and invested capital are calculated by the Energy
Authority under criteria consistent with international
regulatory practices. In setting tariff levels for the 2004-2007
period, the Energy Authority revised the way depreciation costs
are calculated for transmission and distribution companies;
whereas in the 2000-2003 period, the depreciation costs
recognized were based on the value of a company’s network
assets and the related depreciation expenses as recorded in
companies’ statutory accounts, these costs are now
calculated based on the historical cost of infrastructure, as
revalued annually. The useful lives of assets considered by the
Energy Authority to determine depreciation expenses to be
recognized through the transport charges have also been
increased to bring them into line with the expected useful life
of plant and equipment.
Prior to 2004, both the transmission and distribution component
of the transport charges paid by non-residential customers to
distributors were set on the basis of proposals made by each
distributor and approved by the Energy Authority. During that
period, the transport charges for residential customers were set
directly by the Energy Authority as part of the tariff paid by
them to distributors. Starting in 2004, the Energy Authority has
directly set the transmission component of the transport charge
for all customers, while distributors retain the ability to
propose to non-residential customers one or more options for the
distribution component of the transport charge, based on the
distributors’ costs as described above and within limits
set by the Energy Authority.
These limits are of two types. One limit sets an aggregate
maximum amount of tariff revenues that each distributor will be
allowed to receive from all customers belonging to the same
category in a single year. A second limit sets the maximum
amount of tariff revenues that any distributor will be allowed
to receive from a single customer in a given category. If the
aggregate limit is exceeded, the distributor must compensate
customers for the amount of the excess. The Energy Authority
monitors compliance with the individual limit at the time the
distributor submits its price options for approval. In addition,
distributors must comply with a trade policy code aimed at
ensuring transparency.
Residential customers do not have any options for the
distribution component per se, since the tariff they pay
includes the generation component and transport charges without
distinguishing between the two. However, distributors may now
also offer regulated market customers different tariff options,
subject to approval by the Energy Authority. Please see
“Item 4. Information on the Company —
Business — The Enel Group — Sales,
Infrastructure and Networks — Domestic Distribution
and Sales Operations — Telemanagement System” for
information regarding our tariff options.
System Charges and Other Charges
The tariff structure also addresses the need to cover various
costs resulting from public policy-related requirements imposed
on the Italian electricity industry by providing for the
following charges, payable by all electricity consumers:
•
Charges concerning the electricity system, established by the
Ministry of Productive Activities, that consist of:
•
a nuclear surcharge, covering part of the costs incurred by
So.g.i.n., the company to which we transferred our discontinued
Italian nuclear operations, in connection with the dismantling
of nuclear plants and decommissioning of nuclear fuels; this
surcharge is designed to cover substantially all of such costs
when added to the funds that we transferred to So.g.i.n.;
•
a surcharge that benefits producers from renewable resources;
•
special surcharges covering the cost of supplying electricity at
mandated discounts to certain customers (primarily the Italian
state-owned railway company and Acciai Speciali Terni S.p.A.,
both of which transferred electricity assets to us as part of
the nationalization of the Italian electricity industry in 1962);
•
research and development surcharges, covering related
costs; and
•
certain stranded costs that have not yet been recovered. Please
see “— Stranded Costs” below for a
discussion of these costs.
•
Other general interest charges established by the Energy
Authority to adjust or refine the operation of the tariff
mechanism, which include adjustments to cover potential
differences between distributors’ costs as recognized under
the current tariff structure and actual tariff revenues.
•
Incentives for the enhancement of the quality of service.
•
Charges recovered through upward adjustments to the price caps,
as established by the Energy Authority, which cover:
•
costs deriving from unforeseeable events, changes in the
regulatory framework or new obligations for universal service;
•
costs deriving from demand-side management initiatives intended
to promote a more efficient use of resources by electricity
customers, including information campaigns; and
•
additional recognized costs incurred in connection with the
offer of value-added services on top of basic options.
Revenues deriving from system charges are remitted to and
managed by the Cassa Conguaglio per il Settore Elettrico,
or the Equalization Fund, a public entity charged with
redistributing these revenues to the electricity companies
entitled to receive them.
Stranded Costs
Stranded costs are current costs deriving from contractual
commitments or investment decisions that electricity companies:
•
undertook for reasons of public policy;
•
undertook at a time when the electricity markets were not yet
open to competition; and
•
could have been recovered in a monopoly regime but cannot be
recovered under a regime of competitive electricity pricing.
To facilitate the transition to open electricity markets, the
European Commission has stated that electricity companies should
be refunded their stranded costs provided that:
•
they minimize the impact of those costs (and, hence, the amount
of the refund) on their future operations; and
•
they submit an industrial plan demonstrating the long-term
profitability of the activity related to the stranded costs.
A law enacted in April 2003 limited the amount of stranded costs
we are entitled to recover for periods through 2003 to
(i) certain costs relating to our generation plants
incurred to comply with requirements that were imposed in the
past concerning their design and operation (for example, because
of governmental policies, we built most of our plants to ensure
a high degree of flexibility in the types of fuel that they can
use), and (ii) costs arising from our inability to fulfill
our Nigerian LNG contract because of the Italian
government’s failure to allow construction of a required
regasification terminal. The April 2003 law provides that for
periods after January 1, 2004, we will be limited to
recovering only those stranded costs associated with the
Nigerian LNG contract.
In August 2004, the MEF and the Ministry of Productive
Activities issued a joint decree that determined the overall
amount of stranded costs we are entitled to recover. On
December 1, 2004, following the European Commission’s
approval of the decree pursuant to the state aid rules of the
European Union, we became entitled to recover approximately
€513 million
on account of stranded costs related to our generation plants
for the period 2000-2003. The amount of stranded costs related
to the Nigerian LNG contract we are entitled to recover was
determined to be approximately
€555 million
in respect of the 2000-2003 period and approximately
€910 million
in respect of the 2004-2009 period. Although we did not actually
received these funds in 2004, during that year we recorded
related revenues of
€1,219 million,
the amount we became entitled to receive in respect of 2004 and
prior years under the August 2004 decree.
The timing and manner in which these amounts are to be paid to
us were set out in a decree issued jointly by the Ministry of
Productive Activities and the MEF on June 22, 2005. The
decree provides that stranded costs related to the Nigerian LNG
contract for the period ending in 2004 and stranded costs
related to our generation plants will be reimbursed by December
2009 through quarterly payments. Stranded costs related to the
Nigerian LNG contract for the period from 2004 through 2009 will
be limited to the value of gas effectively used for electricity
generation, calculated on a yearly basis. At the end of 2005, we
had received
€361 million
as compensation for those stranded costs.
Continuity and Quality of Service Regulation
Since July 1, 2000, the Energy Authority has issued
guidelines setting targets for electricity service continuity
and quality. Continuity of service is measured by the frequency
and total duration in minutes of service interruptions and is
assessed with reference to annual targets set by the Energy
Authority. Quality of service is measured in terms of waiting
time for the performance of the most frequent commercial
activities (such as connection cost estimates, connections,
disconnections and reconnections).
The Energy Authority has instituted an incentive system whereby
it grants bonuses to companies that exceed its targets for
continuity of service and imposes penalties on companies that
fail to meet them. We have consistently exceeded our continuity
of service targets since 2000. Distributors that outperform the
targets are paid their bonuses through a component of the tariff
structure. We received bonuses of
€63 million
for having outperformed the continuity of service targets in
2004. We expect that the Energy Authority will assign bonuses
with respect to 2005 in the second half of 2006.
With respect to quality of service, if a distribution company
fails to meet standards set by the Energy Authority in providing
a particular service to a customer, the company is required to
reimburse that customer an amount that is fixed by the Energy
Authority. We have achieved most of the quality of service
targets set by the Energy Authority, and have not been required
to make material reimbursements.
In May 2005, the Energy Authority issued a consultation
document, subject to public comment through June 30, 2005,
proposing to institute a system of automatic compensation
payable by electricity distributors to affected customers in the
event of a blackout of other prolonged service interruption.
Under these proposals, compensation would be payable by a
distributor that fails to restore service within eight hours
from the start of the interruption, if the interruption has not
been caused by damage to the distributor’s facilities, or
within 24 hours from the start of the interruption, if the
interruption has been caused by damage to the distributor’s
facilities. The Energy Authority’s proposals also provide
for incentive mechanisms for distributors to restore service as
soon as possible in the event of a widespread and prolonged
service interruption. The Energy Authority has not yet taken any
action as a result of its consultation.
We believe that the level of revenues expected under the current
tariff structure will allow us and other distributors to cover
the costs we need to incur to meet the continuity and quality of
service targets set by the Energy Authority. See also
“— Business — The Enel
Group — Sales, Infrastructure and Networks —
Domestic Distribution and Sales Operations —
Continuity and Quality of Network Service.”
Promotion of Renewable Resources
In 1992, the Comitato Interministeriale Prezzi, an
Italian governmental committee, issued Regulation 6/92
(“CIP 6”), which established incentives for new
generation plants using renewable resources and for the sale of
electricity produced from renewable resources. Initially under
the CIP 6 regime, we had been required to purchase substantially
all of the qualifying domestic production of electricity from
renewable resources at fixed prices. In November 2000, the
Ministry of Productive Activities issued a decree that
transferred all energy produced from renewable resources under
the CIP 6 regime to the GRTN as of January 1, 2001. Under
current regulations, the GRTN is required to purchase all CIP 6
electricity, which it resells to Eligible Customers and,
starting from 2004, also to the Single Buyer. The Single Buyer
has a right to a predefined quota of CIP 6 electricity. Until
2003, Eligible Customers obtained CIP 6 electricity pursuant to
an auction mechanism; starting from 2004, they are awarded CIP 6
electricity on a pro-rata basis. The GRTN sells “green
certificates” representing electricity from renewable
resources purchased from CIP 6 producers. In June 2005, the GRTN
estimated that total annual CIP 6 electricity production in 2005
would be equal to approximately 50 TWh, in line with the amount
produced in 2004.
The Bersani Decree provided that, starting in 2001, all
companies introducing more than 100 GWh of electricity generated
from conventional sources into the national transmission grid in
any year must, in the following year, introduce into the
national transmission grid an amount of electricity produced
from newly qualified renewable resources equal to at least 2% of
the amount of such excess over 100 GWh, net of co-generation,
self-consumption and exports. Electricity from renewable
resources may be produced directly or purchased from other
producers who have obtained tradable “green
certificates” representing a fixed amount of electricity
certified as generated from renewable resources.
In addition, the Bersani Decree directed the GRTN to dispatch
electricity into the national transmission grid so that energy
produced from qualified renewable resources takes priority over
other types of electricity.
An EU directive issued in September 2001 set targets for energy
production from renewable resources, requiring that by 2010 a
share equal to 22% of total electricity consumed in the EU be
generated from renewable
resources and providing recommended national targets to achieve
this goal. Italy adopted legislation to implement this directive
in December 2003, setting a 22.5% target for total production of
electricity from renewable resources by 2010, lower than the 25%
target for Italy recommended in the EU directive. December 2003
legislation amending the Bersani Decree provided for a
progressive increase in the 2% share of electricity produced
from newly qualified renewable resources electricity generators
are required to introduce into the national transmission grid.
For 2004, the percentage was increased to 2.35%, and this level
will increase by a further 0.35 percentage points in each
of 2005 and 2006. Further increases may be implemented for the
three-year periods starting in 2007 and 2010.
Hydroelectric Power
Under the Bersani Decree, all of our licenses for the generation
of electricity from large bodies of water, which had originally
been granted to us for an indeterminate period of time, were
instead to expire in April 2029. In addition, the Bersani Decree
automatically extended to December 31, 2010 the term of all
hydroelectric licenses for the generation of electricity from
large bodies of water that were granted to other electricity
producers and were scheduled to expire before such date. All
hydroelectric licenses expiring after December 31, 2010
were to retain their original expiration date. The decree also
provided that in any bidding contest, an existing license holder
would enjoy preferential treatment over competitors in the case
of equal bids.
In January 2004, the European Commission determined that certain
of the Italian regulations regarding hydroelectric concessions
were contrary to EU law. In particular, the European Commission
objected to the renewal preferences granted to existing holders
of concessions (and in the region of Trentino-Alto Adige, to the
operator controlled by the local authorities) upon the expiry of
those concessions, as well as to the fact that the regulations
provided for the expiration of all concessions in 2029 (and for
the region of Trentino-Alto Adige, in 2010), even though these
concessions had previously been of perpetual duration.
In December 2005, Italy amended the relevant regulations,
abrogating the renewal preferences and postponing the expiration
of all concessions for additional 10 years. However, if the
European Commission continues to pursue its formal action before
the Court of Justice to enforce its request and the Court of
Justice affirms the European Commission’s opinion, our
hydroelectric concessions may be terminated prematurely and we
may not be able to renew these concessions at all or on
favorable terms. This could have a material adverse effect on
our business prospects, financial condition and results of
operations. The European Commission’s decision on whether
to continue its formal action is expected in the second half of
2006. Please see “Item 3. Key Information —
Risk Factors — Risks Related to Our Energy
Business — A European Commission challenge to Italian
regulations on hydroelectric concessions could adversely affect
our business, financial condition and results of
operations.”
Five regional governments in Italy and the local authorities of
the region of Trentino Alto Adige have brought proceedings
against these amended regulations in front of Italy’s
Constitutional Court, seeking the reinstitution of the original
expiry dates for operations they control. A ruling from the
Constitutional Court is not expected before the end of 2006.
Taxes
Since January 1, 2001, consumers of electricity services
have been subject to three indirect taxes, the first two of
which are not applicable to residential customers whose
consumption is below certain specified thresholds, qualifying
them for a social protection scheme:
•
A state tax for residential uses (of
€0.0047/kWh) and
for other uses (of
€0.0031/kWh
excluding users with consumption over 1.2 GWh per month);
•
Additional local taxes that vary from
€0.0093/kWh up to
a maximum of
€0.0204/kWh; and
•
Value-added tax of 20% for all users with the exception of
residential and industrial customers (who are taxed at a rate of
10%).
Italian regulations enacted in May 2000 pursuant to EU Directive
98/30, which mandated the general liberalization of natural gas
markets in the member states, seek to introduce competition into
the Italian natural gas market through the liberalization of the
import, export, transport, dispatching, distribution and sale of
gas. In 2007, the Italian government may enact more regulations
to foster competition in the Italian natural gas market pursuant
to EU Directive 2003/55.
Gas Eligible and Non-Eligible Customers
Until December 31, 2002, only certain large consumers known
as Gas Eligible Customers, were able to freely choose their
supplier of natural gas. During the same period, customers,
mainly residential, who did not qualify as Gas Eligible
Customers, which we refer to as Gas Non-Eligible Customers, were
obliged to purchase gas from distributors operating in their
local area at a tariff set by the Energy Authority. Since
January 1, 2003, all customers have had direct access to
the natural gas system and the right to freely choose their
natural gas supplier. However, natural gas suppliers and
distributors are still subject to regulation with respect to the
tariffs they may charge customers who were considered Gas
Non-Eligible Customers at that date. Our management believes
that to date only a few Gas Non-Eligible Customers have switched
their natural gas supplier. Please see
“— Distribution Tariffs and Sale Tariffs for Gas
Non-Eligible Customers” below.
Transport and Storage
Companies engaged in the transport and dispatching of gas must
allow access to their gas transport networks to third parties,
provided that they have enough capacity and that granting such
access is economically and technically feasible. The Energy
Authority establishes transport fees based on proposals from the
individual operators.
Operators of natural gas storage facilities must obtain a
concession from the Ministry of Productive Activities and are
required to provide storage services to third parties upon
request, provided that they have enough capacity and that giving
such storage services is economically and technically feasible.
In addition, importers are required to maintain storage reserves
equal to 10% of the gas they import from countries outside the
EU.
Distribution and Sale of Gas
The term distribution refers to the transport of gas through
local networks for delivery to customer premises. Since
January 1, 2002, gas distribution activities may be carried
out only by companies that are not otherwise engaged in the
natural gas industry, and gas sales to end users may be made
only by companies that are not otherwise engaged in the natural
gas industry except as importers, producers or wholesalers.
The Marzano Law provides incentives for investment in new
natural gas pipelines and LNG regasification terminals by
exempting the investing entity from the obligation to provide
third-party access up to 80% of the storage capacity of new
storage facilities for a period of not less than 20 years.
We expect these investment incentives eventually to lead to
increased competition in the gas distribution storage sector.
Restrictions on Sale and Imports of Gas
The sale of gas to end users is made under an authorization
granted by the Ministry of Productive Activities, which both
Enel Gas and Enel Trade have obtained. Enel Trade is also
authorized to import gas to be sold to power plants and
wholesalers. Each year from January 1, 2003 to
December 31, 2010, no single operator has been allowed to
hold a market share higher than 50% of domestic sales to final
customers. In 2004, based on data provided by the Energy
Authority, Enel Gas had a market share in sales of natural gas
to final customers of approximately 14%. In addition, no single
operator is allowed to introduce imported or national gas into
the domestic transmission grid in a quantity exceeding a
specified percentage of the total, set at 75% in 2002 and
decreasing by two percentage points each year thereafter, to 61%
in 2010. The applicable percentage is calculated net of
quantities of gas consumed by the relevant operator or by its
controlled or affiliated companies.
Under Italian regulations, distributors operate under
concessions awarded by local authorities pursuant to tender
procedures for periods not longer than 12 years. Through
service agreements, local authorities may regulate the terms and
conditions for the provision of the service and the quality
objectives to be achieved. The tenders are awarded based on
financial terms, quality and safety standards, investment plans
and technological and management skills offered. Distributors
are required to connect to the distribution network any customer
who so requests.
Prior to enactment of the Marzano Law, gas distribution
concessions awarded prior to May 2000 by means other than
competitive tender expired by law at the earlier of their
original expiration date or December 31, 2005, with the
expiration date extendible for up to five years under certain
conditions. The Marzano Law, as interpreted by the Ministry of
Productive Activities in November 2004, provided instead that
the expiration date of these gas distribution concessions are to
expire at the earlier of their original expiration date or
December 31, 2007, with the expiration date extendible for
up to five years under certain conditions. However, certain
local authorities have passed measures that would terminate gas
distribution concessions in their jurisdictions on
December 31, 2005. The Italian administrative courts before
which these measures have been challenged disagreed with the
Ministry of Productive Activities’s interpretation of the
Marzano Law. To remedy the resulting uncertainty, on
February 23, 2006, the Italian parliament approved a law
confirming that gas distribution concessions expire by law at
the earlier of their original expiration date or
December 31, 2007, but extended the expiration date to
December 31, 2009 under certain conditions. Local
authorities may further extend the expiration date by one year.
Furthermore, certain gas distribution concessions for southern
Italy, partially financed through public funds under a public
incentives plan of the use of natural gas in the south of Italy,
expire at the later of June 21, 2012 or twelve years from
the entry into force of their approval by the Ministry of
Economy and Finance. Finally, gas distribution concessions
awarded prior to May 2000 by competitive tender expire at the
earlier of their original expiration date or December 31,2012. The majority of our existing gas distribution concessions
are currently due to expire on December 31, 2009.
Distribution Tariffs and Sales Tariffs for Gas Non-Eligible
Customers
In December 2000, pursuant to Italian regulations, the Energy
Authority identified tariff criteria that we and other gas
distributors and suppliers must apply in setting tariffs for the
distribution and supply of gas to Gas Non-Eligible Customers.
The tariff criteria for both distribution and supply include a
fixed and a variable component reflecting the balance between
fixed and variable costs incurred by distributors and suppliers,
respectively, and operate to impose a cap on the rates gas
distributors and suppliers may charge. The portion of the
variable component in the sale tariff relating to the cost of
natural gas is revised on a quarterly basis.
For distributors, the tariff criteria generally take into
account average capital costs, as determined by the Energy
Authority based on a sample of selected operators. However,
since June 2002, the Energy Authority has permitted distributors
to set their rates based on actually incurred capital costs if
such costs can be adequately proven.
The Energy Authority has issued new distribution tariffs for the
period October 2004 through September 2008. However, in February
2005, the Administrative Tribunal of Lombardy annulled these new
tariffs. As a consequence, pending action from the Energy
Authority to revise the tariff mechanism, the old tariffs remain
applicable. In any event, we do not expect any such revisions to
have a material impact on our gas business going forward and,
should the new tariffs require adjustments, we will be entitled
to modify customers’ bills accordingly.
From 2004, distributors are also bound by regulations concerning
quality of service. So far, the Energy Authority has introduced
both penalties for distributors that do not comply with
applicable quality of service targets and incentives to achieve
higher safety standards.
For suppliers, prices charged to Gas Non-Eligible Customers were
supposed to be freely set from January 1, 2003. However, in
December 2002, the Energy Authority imposed a transitory regime
under which suppliers were obliged to continue to supply former
Gas Non-Eligible Customers using the tariff criteria established
by the
Energy Authority and in effect at December 31, 2002, if the
Gas Non-Eligible Customers so requested. Pursuant to these
criteria, the Energy Authority updates the tariffs on a
quarterly basis. In March 2006, the Energy Authority established
the tariffs applicable from April 1, 2006 to June 30,2006.
In December 2004, the Energy Authority revised the tariff
criteria for former Gas Non-Eligible Customers in order to
reduce the effect of fuel price increases on gas prices. In June
2005, the Administrative Tribunal of Lombardy annulled the
Energy Authority’s decision in a series of judgments.
However, in March 2006 the Council of State overruled one of
these judgments and by June 2007 it should rule on the validity
of the others. Should the Energy Authority decide to restore the
revised tariff criteria, our tariff revenues would be
considerably reduced.
Gas Emergency
In early 2006, Italy suffered a gas shortage, due to an increase
of gas demand and a reduction of gas imports, which
significantly diminished available gas stocks. As a result, the
Italian government issued a decree aimed at reducing gas
consumption by power generators. The Energy Authority is
currently responsible for establishing adequate compensation to
cover any additional costs incurred by power generators as a
result of this decree.
Environmental Matters
Our electricity and other operations are subject to extensive
environmental regulation, including laws adopted by the Italian
parliament or government to implement regulations and directives
adopted by the European Union and international agreements on
the environment.
The principal objective of our environmental policy is to comply
with all relevant legislation and to seek to reduce adverse
effects that our activities may have on the environment. Since
1996, we have taken the initiative of publishing an annual
environmental report. In 2002, we also started publishing a
sustainability report, which contains an environmental section.
We believe that environmental performance will represent an
increasingly important competitive factor in a liberalized
market.
Environmental regulations affecting our business primarily
relate to air emissions, water pollution, waste disposal, noise
and the clean up of contaminated sites. The principal air
emissions of fossil-fueled electricity generation that pollute
the atmosphere are sulfur dioxide
(SO2),
nitrogen oxides
(NOx),
and particulate matter. A primary focus of the environmental
regulations applicable to our business is an effort to reduce
these emissions. We have also given particular attention to
seeking to minimize the impact of electromagnetic fields and
carbon dioxide
(CO2)
and other greenhouse gas (“GHG”) emissions.
Electromagnetic Fields
The Italian government adopted regulations in 1992 and 1995
relating to exposure to electromagnetic fields applicable to low
frequency infrastructure, such as that used for the
transmission, distribution and consumption of electricity. These
regulations set two types of limits: maximum levels of exposure
to electromagnetic fields from new and existing transmission and
distribution lines and distribution substations, and minimum
distances between transmission or high-voltage distribution
lines or substations and residential buildings, office buildings
and similarly habited areas for lines built after the adoption
of the 1992 regulation.
In February 2001, the Italian parliament passed a framework law
on electromagnetic field exposure amending these earlier
regulations. The 2001 law is intended to protect the general
public and workers against alleged potential long-term health
effects of exposure to electromagnetic fields generated by both
low frequency and high-frequency infrastructures. The law has
made it more difficult to install new transmission and
distribution lines and substations.
Furthermore, the 2001 law provides for the adoption and
implementation of programs to restructure electricity
transmission and distribution lines, substations and high
frequency infrastructures, in accordance with maximum exposure
levels. In 2003, two governmental decrees were enacted providing
for measures to implement the 2001 law and setting maximum
exposure levels, precaution levels and quality targets. However,
these
measures have not yet taken effect, as they require action from
the Italian Authority for Environmental Protection that has not
yet been taken.
We believe that the costs of complying with these measures,
including costs for the related restructuring described above,
will not have a material impact on our results of operations.
Moreover, because of the 2005 and 2006 disposal of all but 5.12%
of our stake in Terna, which owns over 90% of Italy’s power
transmission lines, we are no longer materially affected by
regulations relating to electricity transmission. Currently, we
only own power lines for the distribution of electricity.
CO2Emissions
Both the European Union and Italy are signatories to the Kyoto
Protocol, which was signed under the United Nations Framework
Convention on Climate Change. In accordance with a
burden-sharing agreement among EU member states, Italy has set a
target to reduce emissions of
CO2
and the other GHGs listed in the Kyoto Protocol over the
2008-2012 period by 6.5% from their 1990 levels. As of 2004, we
produced approximately 11% of total GHG emissions in Italy.
In implementing the Kyoto protocol, on November 19, 1998,
the Italian inter-ministerial committee for economic planning
issued the guidelines for Italian policies and measures for the
reduction of GHG emissions in order to implement the Kyoto
Protocol. These guidelines, which were updated in 2002, set
targets for
CO2
and other GHG emissions to be achieved through measures
concerning various sectors of the Italian economy, including a
reduction of carbon produced in thermal electricity generation,
an increased use of electricity generation from renewable
resources and demand-side management to increase the efficiency
of energy use. Furthermore, the guidelines promote certain
projects aimed at the development of so called clean energy.
In July 2000, we signed a voluntary undertaking with the
Environment Ministry and the Ministry of Productive Activities
to reduce the annual level of
CO2
emissions produced by our plants during the period between 2002
and 2006 from our level of emissions in 1990. The undertaking
anticipates a number of measures to reduce GHGs emissions,
including employing high-efficiency technologies, such as CCGT
conversions, promoting the use of renewable resources and
developing innovative generation technologies.
In January 1999, the Italian government introduced a carbon tax
in accordance with European Union directives. The carbon tax is
designed to reduce Italy’s
CO2
emissions so as to comply with the Kyoto Protocol. Under the
current Italian legislation, the amount of the tax, which is
based on fossil fuel consumption, although initially scheduled
to increase on an annual basis from 1999 through 2005, has been
frozen at the level for 1999. The relevant EU directives provide
for a periodic review of this tax, including its possible
abolition. We and other European electricity companies believe
that, with the introduction of the emission trading rules in
January 2005, the carbon tax should have been abolished in order
to avoid market distortion and double taxation since both this
tax and the emission trading rules have the objective of
reducing
CO2
emissions to comply with the Kyoto Protocol.
In the period between 2003 and 2005, our carbon tax liability
decreased from approximately
€40 million
in 2003 and 2004 to
€37 million
in 2005.
With a view to ensuring compliance with the Kyoto Protocol, in
2003 the EU adopted an Emission Trading Directive establishing a
scheme for GHG emission allowance trading. Italian legislation
partly implementing this directive came into force at the end of
2004. In October 2004, the EU also passed another directive (the
so-called “linking directive”), which amended the
Emission Trading Directive to allow the use of other flexible
mechanisms for limiting GHG emissions. The Legislative Decree
fully implementing the EU legislation on emission trading in
Italy entered into force on June 20, 2006.
The Emission Trading Directive requires that each member state
submit to the European Commission a proposal on how it plans to
comply with the directive’s emission limits. This proposal
is to consist of an allocation plan by which each member state
sets
CO2
emissions thresholds for the 2005-2007 period for various
industries, including the energy sector, and must provide for
fines to be imposed on entities whose emissions exceed these
thresholds. In 2006, the allowable levels for the 2008 to 2012
period will be established.
In July 2004, the Environment Ministry and the Ministry of
Productive Activities submitted to the European Commission a
national allocation plan for Italy. Under the national
allocation plan, the thresholds for thermal power plants would
vary depending on the type of fuel burned, so as not to
disadvantage plants that burn fuels such as coal, which,
although generating higher levels of emissions, contribute to
the stability and reliability of supply. In December 2004, the
Italian government put in place the procedures necessary to
authorize plants to emit GHGs and to gather the necessary
information to grant emission rights. We received the relevant
authorizations for our power plants in December 2004. In an
amendment to the national allocation plan published on February
2005, the Enel Group was assigned emissions quotas of
54 million, 45 million and 45 million metric tons
of
CO2for
the years 2005, 2006 and 2007, respectively. Viesgo Group has
been assigned emission quotas for its existing installations of
3.9 million, 3.4 million and 2.65 million metric
tons of
CO2
for the years 2005, 2006 and 2007, respectively.
On May 25, 2005, the European Commission approved
Italy’s national allocation plan, including, however,
modifications that reduce the allowable emissions assigned to
Italy by 9% (from 255 million metric tons to
232 million per year), which therefore required a revision
to the February 2005 emissions quota allocations. On
February 23, 2006, the Environment Ministry issued a decree
establishing the emissions quotas for the Enel Group from 2005
through 2007, reducing the quotas we had been granted in
February 2005 to 48.2 million, 40.5 million,
39.9 million tons of
CO2
for the years 2005, 2006 and 2007 respectively.
Enel’s actual emissions in 2005 were higher than the
emission quotas to which its plants were entitled for that year
by approximately 8 million tons in Italy and approximately
2 million tons in Spain. Our emission quotas for the years
2006 and 2007 are substantially in line with the level of
emissions we are currently projecting for those years. Moreover,
these quotas allocations do not include allowances reserved for
new plants.
The measures that we plan to implement in order to comply with
the Emission Trading Directive limits and Italian implementing
legislation include:
•
Switching fuel;
•
Converting existing oil-fired thermal power plants into
gas-fired or high-efficiency coal-fired plants;
•
Increasing renewable energy capacity; and
•
Sourcing
CO2
credits through the development of Clean Development Mechanism
(CDM) and Joint Implemetation (JI) projects in the
energy sector (in particular geothermal), investing in carbon
funds and purchasing emission reductions through bilateral
contracting.
SO2,
NOxand Other Emissions
The principal EU directive on air emissions affecting the
electricity industry is the large combustion plants directive
(“LCPD”). The LCPD requires each EU member state to
establish and implement a program of progressive reduction of
total
SO2
emissions and total NOx emissions from generation plants
licensed before July 1, 1987, and to establish emission
limits for
SO2,
NOx and particulate matter from individual generation plants
licensed after July 1, 1987. In 2001, new, more stringent
emission limits were set in an amendment to the LCPD.
Limitations on plant emissions set by Italian legislation are
stricter than those envisaged in the LCPD as well as in the 2001
amendment (which Italy has not yet implemented), also requiring
5-year gradual
reduction targets of aggregate emissions from plants licensed
prior to July 1, 1988 through the end of 2003. We achieved
the required reductions in each of the years in which they were
applicable, including 2003.
In addition, Italy is bound by an EU directive issued in 2001
mandating that member states achieve specified reduction targets
on
SO2,
NOx, volatile organic compounds and
NH3
emissions by 2010. To this end, member states were required to
establish and implement a program of emissions reduction in
order to achieve the targets set in the directive. Italy is also
a member of the Helsinki Protocol and the Oslo Protocol, which
require signatory countries to reduce
SO2
emissions, and the Sofia Protocol, which requires signatories to
reduce NOx emissions. The requirements under these protocols
have been reflected in Italian law.
In addition, in 1990, Italy established a regulation limiting
emissions of polluting substances from thermal plants licensed
before July 1, 1988 that is more strict than the LCPD and
covers a much broader range of pollutants. This regulation
required that individual existing thermal plants in Italy reduce
emissions to levels similar to those established under the LCPD
for individual plants licensed after July 1, 1988. This
regulation also provided a time schedule for the implementation
of environmental compliance measures at existing plants.
In response to this regulation, in 1990 we implemented a
significant program of environmental measures that affect our
entire thermal generation operation. We submitted this program
to the relevant ministries of the Italian government, including
those for industry, environment and health. The program was
approved and provided for modifications of both physical plant
and operating practices. Enel has achieved the targets the
Italian regulation provided for the implementation of these
environmental compliance measures for generating facilities.
We are currently in compliance with the limits set by existing
legislation. We had received a derogation from the required
limits with regard to our plant at Porto Tolle pending our
receipt of required authorizations to effect a conversion of the
plant to make it fully compliant. While this derogation expired
on December 31, 2004, we expect to complete the conversion
of this plant by 2011, and meanwhile are meeting the required
limits at the plant through operational means.
The following tables show the level of
SO2
and NOx emissions from our power plants included within our
present limits in the period from 2001 to 2005, and the percent
reductions in the level of these emissions compared to 2000.
Reductions of
SO2emissions against 2000 levels
Percentage
Year
Metric Tons
Change
(In thousands)
2001
213
(11
)
2002
187
(21
)
2003
101
(58
)
2004
94
(61
)
2005
73
(69
)
Reductions of
NOxemissions against 2000 levels
Percentage
Year
Metric Tons
Change
(In thousands)
2001
71
(8
)
2002
71
(9
)
2003
62
(20
)
2004
56
(28
)
2005
49
(37
)
In 1997, the Italian parliament imposed a tax on total
SO2
and NOx emissions from thermal plants that have a nominal
capacity greater than 50 MW. These plants are the same
plants as those regulated under the LCPD. In 2003, 2004 and
2005, our costs in connection with this tax were approximately
€9 million,
€8 million
and
€7 million,
respectively.
In May 1999, the Italian government adopted a legislative decree
concerning the recovery and disposal of electric transformers
and other equipment containing polychlorinated biphenyls, or
PCBs. The decree provides that:
•
electric transformers and other equipment which contains PCBs
above 500 parts per million must be decommissioned or
decontaminated by 2009;
•
equipment which contains PCBs below the limit set out above can
be used until the end of its operational life; and
•
equipment which has been contaminated by PCBs spillage must be
decommissioned by 2005.
In December 2003, we adopted a disposal plan to comply with this
legislation and we are delivering all of our equipment
containing PCBs to companies authorized to recover and dispose
of such equipment. We estimate the phasing out of the equipment
containing more than 500 ppm to be completed by 2006 and
the phasing out of the equipment containing less than
500 ppm by 2010.
We also deliver waste products containing asbestos to
specialized companies authorized to treat and dispose of
asbestos. Such waste products derive from the clean up of our
plants we conduct in accordance with our general maintenance and
environmental clean-up
programs.
Water Pollution Prevention
We are subject to environmental laws and regulations limiting
heat and other physical and chemical characteristics of cooling
water and industrial water discharges from our thermal plants
and hydroelectric plants. In May 1999, the Italian parliament
adopted a new law for the prevention of the pollution of fresh
and salt water, which was amended in August 2000. In the same
year, the EU adopted a directive to prevent water pollution. We
believe that the waste water treatment facilities already in
operation at our generation plants are in line with the new
requirements on waste water under EU law.
In April 2006, Italy implemented the EU directive on water
pollution through a legislative decree, which in addition took
initial steps to reorganize Italy’s environmental
regulations, in this field. We do not believe that this
reorganization, which will be completed through additional
decrees, will materially change the obbligations to which we are
subject with respect to water pollution.
Solid Waste Management
In February 1997, the Italian government issued a legislative
decree implementing the EU directives on solid waste management.
In accordance with this decree, we increased the level of
recycling of our waste. In the last five years, our waste
recovery rate has always exceeded 90%.
Site Clearance
Italian legislation provides for ground and underground
inspections to evaluate the possible contamination of sites,
particularly in areas declared to be of national interest, using
specific chemical, physical and historical analyses. If sites we
own are found to be contaminated, the current regulation
requires that we undertake a program of site clearance and
remediation. In that case, under new legislation, the Italian
government may provide financial support for remediation with
respect to contaminated sites located in areas of national
interest. Our costs of compliance with these measures were
€16 million
in 2005. For 2006, we currently expect to spend approximately
€10 million.
We have taken the following actions to reduce the environmental
impact of our power distribution lines:
•
re-using routes of previous power lines wherever possible;
•
using towers for high voltage lines whose design is aimed at
reducing the environmental and aesthetic impact in non-urban
areas of particular landscape value;
•
acting to reduce the impact of lines in environmentally
sensitive or protected areas;
•
increasing use of underground cables in urban areas where
possible;
•
for medium-voltage lines, placing underground cables in urban
areas and aerial cables with low environmental impact in other
areas with specific environmental value; and
•
using aerial insulated cables or underground cables in low
voltage networks (at present, we have built approximately
two-thirds of our network in this way).
We limit our use of underground high-voltage cables to urban
areas because they are significantly more expensive than aerial
cables and the process of installing and operating them may
involve significant logistic and environmental problems. In
2003, our medium voltage aerial insulated cables and underground
cables totaled 127,987 kilometer, which represented 38.3% of our
medium voltage lines, compared to 35.9% in 2000, and our low
voltage aerial insulated cables and underground cables totaled
600,675 kilometer, which represented 82.5% of our low voltage
lines, compared to 80.6% in 2000.
In 2005, due to further work on our network, the percentage of
aerial insulated cables and underground cables rose to 40% and
83% for medium and low voltage lines, respectively.
Environmental Registrations, Certifications and
Authorizations
We have joined EMAS, a European Union initiative to implement a
voluntary environmental management and registration system,
which seeks to improve the level of environmental efficiency and
disclosure of European industrial companies. Rules concerning
EMAS are contained in an EU Regulation issued in 1993.
Originally applicable only to individual sites, in 2001 the EU
passed a new regulation which extended the scope of the EMAS
system to groups of sites and non generation assets, such as
distribution networks.
In October 2004, Enel Distribuzione’s distribution network
obtained ISO 14001 environmental certification. As of December
2005, generating plants that accounted for approximately 77% of
our net installed generating capacity had obtained ISO 14001
certification. One hundred and thirty plants that accounted for
approximately 43% of our net installed capacity have also
obtained EMAS registration.
EMAS registration has significant advantages in terms of the
operation of our assets. In August 1999, the Italian government
enacted a legislative decree implementing the 1996 EU directive
on the prevention and reduction of pollution. This legislative
decree requires all industrial plants to operate under a new
integrated environmental license by 2007 and to make use of the
best techniques available for the prevention and reduction of
pollution. The new licenses set pollution limits and are
reviewed every five years or at any time plants undergo
significant renovation. This law, however, allows licenses for
EMAS-registered plants to be reviewed every eight years (instead
of five) in light of the stringent requirements that must be met
to obtain EMAS registration.
Cost of Compliance
The costs of ensuring compliance with applicable environmental
regulation generally consist of costs associated with equipping
newly constructed facilities with required technology or
modifying existing facilities to comply with applicable
regulation.
In 2005, environmental capital expenditures were equal to
approximately
€100 million,
representing 3.1% of our total capital expenditures. In 2003 and
2004, these environmental capital expenditures totaled
€131 million
and
€112 million,
respectively, representing 3.5% and 2.9%, respectively, of our
total capital expenditures. In 2005 current expenses for
compliance with environmental regulations were equal to
approximately
€350 million,
of which we spent approximately
€260 million
on the purchase of ‘clean’ fuels (low-sulphur oil and
natural gas) in lieu of standard fuels, when required. These
amounts do not include taxes on fuels, polluting emissions and
geothermal generation and possible loss of revenues due to
compliance with environmental standards that limit the operation
of our plants.
Discontinued Nuclear Operations
Since November 2000, we have not owned any nuclear power plants.
We have not produced electricity from nuclear power plants in
Italy since 1988. For information on the nuclear power plants we
now control in Slovakia and our nuclear related initiatives in
France, please see “— Nuclear Liability”
below.
Following a national referendum in 1987 in which the Italian
electorate expressed its opposition to the use of nuclear power,
the Italian government ordered the interruption of power
production from nuclear fuels and we ceased operations at our
four nuclear plants in Italy, which had an aggregate net
installed capacity of 1,500 MW.
In addition to our nuclear power plants, we owned a 33% stake in
NERSA, an electricity generation company that operated a nuclear
power plant located in France. French and German utilities owned
the balance of NERSA. In July 1998, we sold our stake in NERSA.
We, however, retained ownership and responsibility for the
decommissioning of our share of the nuclear fuel in the plant.
Pursuant to the Bersani Decree, we transferred our discontinued
nuclear operations to So.g.i.n., then one of our wholly owned
subsidiaries. The principal activity of So.g.i.n. will be the
decommissioning of the nuclear plants and of our share of the
nuclear fuel in the NERSA plant in France, including disposal of
nuclear fuel and nuclear waste.
Under the Bersani Decree, we were required to transfer to the
MEF all the shares of So.g.i.n. at no cost. The transfer was
completed on November 3, 2000.
Nuclear Liability
Italy is a party to the 1960 Paris Convention on Third Party
Liability in the Field of Nuclear Energy and the 1963 Brussels
Supplementary Convention. Italian law implementing the
conventions imposes strict liability for claims relating to
nuclear plants and the transportation and storage of nuclear
matter. Strict liability under Italian law means that someone
does not need to be negligent in order to be found liable. The
law imposes strict liability for nuclear accidents only on the
entity that is the operator of the plant at the time of the
accident. Consequently, we are not liable for any accident that
may occur after the transfer to the MEF of So.g.i.n.’s
shares on November 3, 2000, even if the cause of the
accident predates the transfer. Although we are not aware of any
accident that predates the transfer, we will remain liable for
any accident that occurred before the transfer, even if the
damage, or the accident itself, is discovered in the future. The
operator of the plant may claim reimbursement from a third party
which has contributed to the cause of the accident for any sums
it may have to pay but only if that party has accepted liability
contractually or is a physical person who has intentionally
caused the damage. Italian law implementing the conventions
imposes a maximum period of ten years from the date of the
accident in which someone claiming damages must bring claims. At
the time of our transfer of So.g.i.n.’s shares, we
represented to the Treasury that we had performed, on a regular
basis, every required test on our nuclear plants and that we
were not aware, with respect to all nuclear assets owned by
So.g.i.n., of any event which might be the source of civil
liability for nuclear operations.
Under Italian law and in accordance with the Paris Convention,
direct liability arising from nuclear liability claims is
limited to five million International Monetary Fund Special
Drawing Rights (“SDRs”) per accident. Under Italian
law, to the extent any claim exceeds five million SDRs, someone
claiming damages may sue us for only five million SDRs and must
sue the Italian government for the excess liability up to
175 million SDRs. If the claim is in excess of
175 million SDRs, that person must sue the signatories to
the conventions, but then only for the excess liability up to
300 million SDRs. However, the Italian government can claim
reimbursement from us for any sums it may have to pay because of
a nuclear accident arising from negligence on our part. On
May 31, 2006, the value of five million SDRs equaled
approximately
€5.9 million.
A provision of the Italian law implementing the conventions
states that when damage has been caused concurrently by a
nuclear accident and the emission of ionizing radiation, the
liability of the person that caused this radiation is not
subject to the limitations described above for damages caused by
that emission. This provision does not fully conform to the
conventions because it does not specify that the ionizing
radiation must not independently qualify as a nuclear accident
in order to give rise to unlimited liability. We believe,
however, that the correct interpretation of Italian law
implementing the conventions is that only radiation not
classified as a nuclear accident gives rise to liability outside
the limitations described above. We believe all emissions of
radiation originating from within nuclear plants would qualify
as nuclear accidents. As a consequence, because we held nuclear
material inside our plants, we believe that we could only be
liable for amounts beyond the limitations described above under
remote circumstances.
In April 2006, we finalized the acquisition of 66% of Slovenske
Elektrarne, the major generating company in Slovakia, which owns
nuclear power plants. Slovakia is a party to the Vienna
Convention on Civil Liability for Nuclear Damages, under which
operators of nuclear installations are subject to strict
liability of at least $5 million which may be claimed for a
period of ten years from the date of the nuclear incident,
except when national legislation provides for different limits
or longer periods. Slovakian law provides for a
€75 million
maximum liability for the operation of nuclear power plants
(€50 million
for the transportation of nuclear materials) and a
20-year limit from the
date of the nuclear incident for the right to compensation. We
have purchased insurance coverage for claims up to ten years
through the insurance market and are seeking additional coverage
for claims arising after ten years.
On May 30, 2005, we entered into a memorandum of
understanding with EDF regarding an industrial partnership that
would permit us to invest in the French electricity market,
including in EDF’s latest generation European Pressurized
Water Reactor, or “EPR,” nuclear power plant project.
Under the memorandum of understanding, EDF will be the operator
of the power plant, and will bear any related nuclear civil
liability. For additional information, please see
“— Business — The Enel
Group — Generation and Energy Management —
International Generation.”
Property, Plants and Equipment
At December 31, 2005, we had 761 generating plants,
consisting of thermal, hydroelectric, geothermal and other
renewable resources facilities, 599 of which were located in
Italy. For further information with respect to our plants,
please see “— Business — The Enel
Group — Generation and Energy Management.” We own
the principal electricity distribution network in Italy, which
consisted, at December 31, 2005, of a total of
1,090,129 kilometer of lines, mostly medium and low
voltage, and 413,429 primary and secondary transformer
substations. For a description of such properties and related
construction, expansion and improvement plans, please see
“— Business — The Enel
Group — Capital Investment Program — Sales,
Infrastructure and Networks.” At December 31, 2005, we
owned real estate, mainly in Italy, with an approximate net book
value of
€872 million,
consisting mainly of office buildings and other commercial
properties and to a lesser extent residential real estate. For a
description of our real estate properties and activities, please
see “— Business — The Enel
Group — Services and Other Activities — Real
Estate and Other Services.”
Management believes that our significant properties are in good
condition and that they are adequate to meet our needs.
ITEM 4A.
UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
Not applicable.
ITEM 5.
OPERATING AND FINANCIAL REVIEW AND PROSPECTS
Summary of Results
Following the coming into force of European
Regulation No. 1606 dated July 2002, we and other EU
companies whose securities are traded on regulated markets in
the EU are required to adopt IFRS (known as international
accounting standards, or IAS, until May 2002) in the preparation
of our 2005 consolidated financial
statements. Our financial statements for the period ending
December 31, 2005, were prepared in accordance with
International Financial Reporting Standards as adopted by the
European Union. Standards introduced prior to the renaming of
IAS as IFRS are still referred to as IAS; we refer to the
combined body of IAS and IFRS standards as IFRS.
You should read note 20 to our consolidated financial
statements for additional information on our transition to
International Financial Reporting Standards.
In 2005, our consolidated operating revenues increased by
€3,048 million,
or 9.8%, from
€31,011 million
in 2004 to
€34,059 million
in 2005. Our operating expenses, excluding depreciation,
amortization and impairment increased by
€3,374 million,
or 14.7%, from
€22,940 million
in 2004 to
€26,314 million
in 2005. Our operating income decreased by
€332 million,
or 5.7%, from
€5,870 million
in 2004 to
€5,538 million
in 2005. Our financial income (expense) and income (expense)
from investments decreased by
€113 million,
or 13.7%, from
€827 million
in 2004 to
€714 million
in 2005. Our income (expense) from investments accounted for
using the equity method increased by
€5 million,
or 20.0%, from
€25 million
in 2004 to
€30 million
in 2005. Our net income, including discontinued operations,
increased by
€1,385 million,
or 50.4%, from
€2,747 million
in 2004 to
€4,132 million
in 2005 (while our income from continuing operations decreased
by
€42 million,
or 1.4%, from
€2,902 million
in 2004 to
€2,860 million
in 2005).
Our principal measure of liquidity is net financial
indebtedness, which was
€12,312 million
at December 31, 2005, as compared to
€24,514 million
at December 31, 2004. Net financial indebtedness is a
non-GAAP measure; cash at banks and marketable securities, the
most directly comparable IFRS measure, was
€508 million
at December 31, 2005, as compared to
€363 million
at December 31, 2004. Please see
“— Liquidity and Capital Resources —
Capital Resources” for a reconciliation of net financial
indebtedness to cash at banks and marketable securities. As of
December 31, 2005, we had 51,778 employees, as compared to
61,898 as of December 31, 2004.
The Electricity Market Regulatory Framework
Overview
Our financial results have been and will be affected to a large
extent by the developments in the regulatory framework for the
Italian electricity market, which was first opened to
competition by the Bersani Decree in 1999 and has been
subsequently further liberalized by EU and national legislation.
The Bersani Decree also provided for the first time that certain
customers, also known as Eligible Customers, could freely choose
their supplier and buy electricity on the free market at
negotiated prices. This freedom was progressively extended, from
customers with high consumption thresholds, to all
non-residential customers as of July 1, 2004. In 2007, all
customers will become Eligible Customers. Currently,
Non-Eligible Customers must purchase electricity from their
local distribution company. The price of electricity for
Non-Eligible Customers is set by the Energy Authority.
On April 1, 2004, the Italian power exchange, a virtual
marketplace for the trading of electricity, started operations.
The Single Buyer, a state-owned entity entrusted with the
responsibility of purchasing all of the electricity to be
supplied to the regulated market, also started operations on
that date. Please see “— Comparability of
Information — Regulatory and Other Developments”
for a description of the impact of the start of operation of the
Italian power exchange and the Single Buyer on our results in
2004.
Since the start of the liberalization of the market, the Energy
Authority, the Antitrust Authority and the European Commission
have adopted several measures to further competition and
constantly monitor the market in order to reduce the risk of
abuses of market power. Furthermore, under the Bersani Decree,
no single company or group could have more than a 50% market
share of the electricity generation and import market after
January 1, 2003, a limit which resulted in our sale of the
Gencos.
In light of Italian laws and regulations providing for the
reunification of the ownership and management of the Italian
transmission grid and imposing certain ownership restrictions on
the entity that owns and manages it, we disposed of most of our
interest in Terna during 2005, and now hold only 5.12% of
Terna’s share capital. You
should read “Item 4. Information on the
Company — Business — The Enel
Group — Discontinued Operations —
Transmission” for more details on our sale of Terna shares.
Please see “Item 4. Information on the
Company — Regulatory Matters — Electricity
Regulation” for a more detailed discussion of the
regulatory framework of the electricity market and
“Item 3. Key Information — Risk
Factors — Risks Relating to Our Energy Business”
for a discussion of the principal regulatory and other risks we
face.
Tariffs and Prices
Most of our operating revenues come from the sale of electricity
in Italy. The price of electricity in Italy has historically
been determined by a system of tariffs. Since the liberalization
of the electricity market, the Energy Authority has set tariffs
for electricity sold on the regulated market, updating them
periodically. The Energy Authority also sets transport charges
payable by all customers for the transmission and distribution
of electricity. Electricity on the free market can be bought
through bilateral contracts or on the Italian power exchange.
Our operating revenues from electricity operations are directly
related to the level of transport charges and the price of
electricity for the regulated market. In addition, our revenues
also include some system charges. Please see “Item 4.
Information on the Company — Regulatory
Matters — Electricity Regulation — The
Tariff Structure” for a more detailed discussion of these
charges.
The tariff regime that applied in the period from 2002 through
February 2004 included:
•
a “generation cost component,” reflecting fuel
costs; and
•
the application of global price-cap reductions to transmission
and distribution transport charges.
In 2004, the Energy Authority set new base tariffs for the
2004-2007 period, which have been in force since
February 1, 2004. The Energy Authority has estimated that
the new tariff regime in place for 2004-2007 will result in a
reduction of the overall tariff paid by regulated market
customers of approximately 13% in real terms (assuming no change
in fuel costs and system charges) during the period. The actual
impact of tariff levels on our revenues depends on a number of
factors, including the volume of electricity we sell in the
regulated market, fluctuations in fuel prices and the mix of
customers we serve.
Prices for electricity sold on the Italian power exchange are
determined on the basis of competitive bidding (please see
“Item 4. Information on the Company —
Regulatory Matters — Electricity
Regulation — The Italian Power Exchange”). Prices
on the power exchange also influence the generation cost
component of the tariff, which is now calculated by the Energy
Authority every three months on the basis of an estimate of the
average costs that the Single Buyer incurs for the procurement
of electricity, both on the Italian power exchange and through
bilateral contracts. The tariff structure currently in place
also includes certain mechanisms to take into account structural
factors affecting distributors’ costs.
Please see “Item 4. Information on the
Company — Regulatory Matters — Electricity
Regulation — The Tariff Structure” for a more
detailed discussion of electricity charges.
Macroeconomic Factors
Electricity demand in Italy grew by 1.3% in 2005, after having
grown by 1.5% in 2004. Growth in demand for electricity is
determined by a variety of factors, including the rate of
economic growth, the level of business activity and weather
conditions. Please see “Item 4. Information on the
Company — Business — The Enel
Group — Italian Electricity Demand” for more
information.
Interest rates in Italy and the rest of Europe have declined in
recent years, though they have begun to increase in 2006. The
weighted average interest rate on our long-term debt as of
December 31, 2005 was 3.9% (in line with the rate of 3.8%
as of December 31, 2004). Our financing costs increase or
decrease in line with changes in interest rates.
Although historically we were insulated to a significant extent
from the economic effect of fluctuations in fuel prices through
the application of the fuel cost component of the tariff
described above, time lags between our
actual purchase of fuel and the calculation and payment to us of
such fuel cost component affected our revenues and income. As a
result of the introduction of the Italian power exchange, which
began operations on April 1, 2004, and increases in the
number of consumers qualifying as Eligible Customers, we now
face increased risks relating to fuel price fluctuations, which
we attempt to manage through the implementation of our hedging
policy. Please see “Item 11. Quantitative and
Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk — Price Risk
Management and Market Risk Information” for a more detailed
description of our hedging policy.
Critical Accounting Policies
Our results of operations, as presented below, are based on the
application of IFRS. The application of these principles often
requires management to make certain judgments, assumptions and
estimates that may result in different financial presentations.
We believe that certain accounting principles are critical in
terms of understanding our financial statements. We believe that
our most critical accounting policies relate to the following
factors.
Use of estimates. The preparation of financial statements
in conformity with IFRS requires management to make judgments,
estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of
assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and
liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the
reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting
period. Certain accounting principles require subjective and
complex judgments used in the preparation of financial
statements. Accordingly, a different financial presentation
could result depending on the judgment, estimates or assumptions
that are used. Such estimates and assumptions, include, but are
not specifically limited to: depreciation, amortization,
interest rates, discount rates, future commodity prices,
investment returns, impact of new accounting standards,
international economic policy, future costs associated with
long-term contractual obligations and future compliance costs
associated with environmental regulations. Actual results could
materially differ from those estimates or assumptions. Effective
January 1, 2005, the economic depreciation rates of certain
assets related to power generation plants were revised in order
to better reflect the estimated economic useful life of these
facilities. Please see “Increased estimates of the useful
lives of certain distribution assets” in
“— Comparability of Information —
Regulatory and Other Developments.”
Revenue Recognition. We usually record revenues for sales
to retail and wholesale customers under the accrual method.
Under both IFRS and U.S. GAAP, revenues from sales of
electricity and gas to retail customers are recognized when the
power and gas are provided to customers on the basis of periodic
meter readings and include an estimate of the value of the power
and gas consumed from the meter reading date to the end of the
period. Revenues for the period after the date of the reading to
the end of the period are estimated on the basis of estimates of
the daily consumption of the customer based on his historical
profile, adjusted to reflect weather and other factors affecting
consumption.
Pension and other post-retirement benefits. Many of our
employees are covered by pension plans, which provide retirement
benefits based upon their historical earnings and years of
service. Certain employees are also covered by other
post-retirement benefit plans. We base our calculation of the
estimated expenses and liabilities related to these plans on
estimations provided by our actuarial consultants who use a
combination of factors, including statistical data from past
years and predictions about future expenses. We consider
quantifiable factors, such as withdrawal and mortality rates,
along with assumptions about future changes in the discount rate
and the rate of future compensation increases, and analyses of
trends in health care costs. These estimates may differ
materially from actual results due to changing market and
economic conditions, higher or lower withdrawal rates, longer or
shorter life spans of participants and changes in the actual
costs of health care. These differences may have a significant
impact on the amount of pension and other post-retirement
benefit expenses recorded.
Recoverability of long-lived assets. We periodically
review the carrying value of our long-lived assets held and used
and that of assets to be disposed of, including goodwill and
other intangible assets, when events and circumstances warrant
such a review. If the carrying value of a long-lived asset group
is considered impaired, an impairment charge is recorded for the
amount by which the carrying value of the long-lived asset group
exceeds its estimated recovery value, in relation to its use or
realization, as determined by reference to the most recent
corporate plans. Management believes that the estimates of these
recovery values are reasonable; however, changes in estimates of
such recovery values could affect the relevant valuations. The
analysis of each long-lived
asset group is unique and requires management to use certain
estimates and assumptions that are deemed prudent and reasonable
for a particular set of circumstances.
Realization of deferred tax assets. As of
December 31, 2005, we had assets recorded for tax loss
carry-forwards. We have recorded our deferred tax assets in an
amount that we believe is more likely than not to be recovered.
The recoverability of the deferred tax assets associated with
the tax loss carry-forwards are subject to the achievement of
future profitability by the entities that recorded such losses.
While we have considered future taxable income and used ongoing
prudent tax planning strategies in assessing the need for
valuation allowances, should we determine that we would not be
able to realize all or part of our net deferred tax assets in
the future, the resulting adjustment to the deferred tax assets
would be charged to income in the period such determination was
made.
Litigation. We are defendants in a number of legal
proceedings incidental to the generation, transmission and
distribution of electricity. Because of the nature of these
proceedings, it is not possible to predict the ultimate outcomes
of certain of these matters, some of which may be unfavorable to
us. However, provisions are made for all significant liabilities
where it has been determined by legal advisors that an
unfavorable outcome is probable and the amount of loss is
estimable. A number of disputes are pending in relation to urban
planning, landscape and environmental matters (mainly related to
exposure to electromagnetic fields) linked to the construction
and operation of several of our generating plants and power
lines. The examination of such disputes, including on the basis
of legal advice, leads us to believe that unfavorable outcomes
would be a remote possibility. While the possibility is remote,
the risk that a limited number of cases might have unfavorable
outcomes, which could entail the payment of damages, cannot be
ruled out. At the present time, the possible imposition and
magnitude of any such damages are not predictable and, we have,
therefore, not accrued any liabilities for these disputes.
Allowance for doubtful accounts. Our allowance for
doubtful accounts reflects our estimate of losses inherent in
our credit portfolio. We have established provisions for
expected credit losses, based on past experience with similar
receivables, including current and historical past due amounts,
write-offs and collections, the careful monitoring of portfolio
credit quality and the current and projected economic and market
conditions. We believe that our reserves are adequate; however,
different assumptions or changes in economic circumstances could
result in changes to the allowance for doubtful accounts and
therefore could affect earnings.
Comparability of Information
Several factors significantly affected the inter-period
comparability of the information presented in this section,
including changes in market regulation and other developments,
changes in our scope of consolidation and changes in our
business segment presentation. These factors, which should be
considered when reviewing the performance of our individual
segments and of the Group as a whole, are discussed below.
Regulatory and Other Developments
The most important regulatory developments affecting our
financial results for 2005 are discussed below.
•
Start of operation of the Italian power exchange and the
Single Buyer. On April 1, 2004, the Italian power
exchange for the spot trading of electricity started operations
and the Single Buyer became responsible for purchasing all of
the electricity to be supplied to the regulated market. Please
see “Item 4. Information on the Company —
Regulatory Matters — Electricity Regulation” for
a detailed discussion of the Italian power exchange, the Single
Buyer and related developments in the Italian electricity
market. As a result of this development, since April 1,2004, our Generation and Energy Management segment sells the
electricity it produces that is destined for the regulated
market to the Single Buyer, and our Sales, Infrastructure and
Networks segment purchases the electricity that it distributes
on the regulated market from the Single Buyer. These sales and
purchases are recorded as operating revenues and operating
expenses, respectively. Before April 1, 2004, our
Generation and Energy Management segment sold electricity for
distribution on the regulated market directly to our Sales,
Infrastructure and Networks segment, and the revenues and costs
arising from these sales were eliminated from, and therefore not
recorded in, our consolidated financial statements. As a result,
both our operating revenues and operating expenses have
increased substantially on a consolidated basis since
April 1, 2004. Sales to the Single
Buyer are now included in the line item “Sales to
regulatory entities, sales on the free market and sales on
foreign markets” in the results presented below. For prior
periods, this line item was referred to as “Sales to
Eligible Customers, sales to the GRTN and sales on foreign
markets,” as the Single Buyer was not fully operational.
Purchases from the Single Buyer are recorded in the operating
expense line item “Purchased Power.”
•
Capacity payments. In order to address a current deficit
in Italian generation capacity relative to rising electricity
demand, the regulatory framework provides incentives to power
generators both to build new capacity as well as to maintain
their existing plants in good working order and available to
cover sudden variations in electricity demand. Effective
March 1, 2004, the Energy Authority established a
provisional system of payments to remunerate producers that make
generation capacity available to the electricity system at times
of peak demand, known as “capacity payments.” Capacity
payments to a given producer comprise both an amount due for
capacity available on “critical” days (set by the GRTN
and now by Terna) and a further amount payable when pool market
prices fall below specified thresholds, as an extra incentive.
This provisional system has been in place from March 2004 and
during all of 2005.
•
August 2004 decree on stranded costs. Stranded costs are
current costs deriving from contractual commitments or
investment decisions that electricity companies undertook for
reasons of public policy, at a time when the electricity markets
were not yet open to competition, and could have been recovered
in a monopoly regime but cannot be recovered under a regime of
competitive electricity pricing. Please see “Item 4.
Information on the Company — Regulatory
Matters — Electricity Regulation” for more
information on stranded costs. In August 2004, the MEF and the
Ministry of Productive Activities issued a joint decree that
determined the overall amount of stranded costs we are entitled
to recover. On December 1, 2004, following the European
Commission’s approval of the decree, we became entitled to
recover approximately
€513 million
on account of stranded costs related to our generation plants
for the period 2000-2003, as well as our stranded costs related
to the Nigerian LNG contract, which were determined to be
€555 million
in respect of the 2000-2003 period and approximately
€910 million
in respect of the 2004-2009 period
(€151 million
of which related to 2004). As a result, in 2004 we recorded as
“other revenues” a total of
€1,219 million
arising in connection with stranded costs, the amount we became
entitled to receive in respect of 2004 and prior years under the
August 2004 decree. Of this total, the
€513 million
related to our generation plants and the
€151 million
related to the Nigerian LNG contract for 2004 were recorded by
our Generation and Energy Management segment, and the
€555 million
related to the Nigerian LNG contract in respect of the 2000-2003
period were recorded by our Corporate segment. In 2005, our
Generation and Management segment recorded
€158 million
for stranded costs related to our Nigerian LNG contract. In
2005, we received payments amounting to
€361 million
for stranded costs accounted in 2004. We have yet to receive any
other amount in this regard.
•
Increased estimates of the useful lives of certain generation
assets. Effective January 1, 2005, following an
independent appraisal, we increased our estimates of the useful
lives of certain assets related to power generation plants. As a
consequence, the amount of depreciation expense we recorded in
2005 with respect to these assets was lower than the amount
recorded for the same assets in 2004 by
€100 million.
Changes in Scope of Consolidation
The principal transactions that have resulted in changes in our
scope of consolidation during the periods under review were the
following:
the disposal of a controlling stake in Wind as of
August 11, 2005;
•
the acquisition of Enel Electrica Banat and Enel Electrica
Dobrogea as of April 28, 2005;
•
the acquisition of Italgestioni and Italgestioni Gas (together,
the “Italgestioni Group”), which are companies active
in the distribution and sale of natural gas to end users in the
provinces of Calabria and Naples, as of December 14, 2004;
the acquisition of Ottogas Rete and Ottogas Vendita (together,
the “Ottogas Group”), which are companies active in
the distribution and sale of natural gas to end users in the
area of Naples and Salerno, as of September 15, 2004; and
•
the disposal of NewReal (a real estate company) as of
July 14, 2004.
Business Segments
In 2005, our operations were organized, reflecting our internal
structure, into six business segments: Generation and Energy
Management; Sales, Infrastructure and Networks; Transmission;
Telecommunications; Services and Other Activities; and Corporate.
At the end of 2005, our management decided to re-organize the
Group’s internal structure by substituting our Sales,
Infrastructure and Networks Division with two separate divisions
(a Market Division and an Infrastructure and Networks Division)
and by allocating our international generation and distribution
operations, which had previously been included in other
divisions, to a new International Division. Our divisions are
currently the following: Generation and Energy Management
Division, Market Division, Infrastructure and Networks Division
and the International Division. Each division is headed by a
senior manager who reports directly to the Chief Executive
Officer of Enel. Moreover, all non-core activities provided by
companies of the Group to all Group companies have been grouped
in our Services and Other Activities sector. Enel, as the parent
company, defines the strategic objectives for the Enel Group and
coordinates the activities of all Group companies. Each of Enel,
our divisions and the Services and Other Activities sector
constitutes a reportable segment. However, such reorganization
of our business segments will be effective from January 1,2006 and, therefore, the reportable segments presented in our
financial statements for 2005 (and the segment information
presented below) still reflect the structure that we had in 2005
with our former Transmission and Telecommunications segments
each being treated as discontinued operations following the
deconsolidation of Terna and Wind.
Generation and Energy Management. This segment
corresponded to the division that was responsible for our
operations related to the production of electricity and the
procurement and trading of fuel for electricity generation, and
included power generation activities in Italy and abroad. This
division generated operating revenues mainly from the sale of
electricity to the Single Buyer (or, prior to April 1,2004, to our Sales, Infrastructure and Networks Division), to
the GRTN and Terna and other resellers in the domestic
electricity market, as well as through fuel trading. The
division, which procured fuel for all of the companies of the
Group, also sold natural gas to our Sales, Infrastructure and
Networks Division and to third parties. This division also sold
electricity to large electricity users, or Eligible Customers,
with annual electricity consumption higher than 100 GWh. The
main companies in this division included the following: in
Italy, Enel Produzione (thermal and hydroelectric generation),
Enel Green Power (geothermal, hydroelectric and wind power
generation), and Enel Trade (fuel procurement and trading, risk
management, sales to large electricity users). We merged Enel
Green Power into Enel Produzione as of June 1, 2005.
Outside of Italy, this division included the following
operations for most of the period presented herein: Enel Viesgo
Generaciņn and EUFR in Spain, Maritza East III in
Bulgaria; Enel North America in the U.S.; and Enel Latin America
in Central and South America. The results from our international
generation operations through December 31, 2005 are
included in those of our Generation and Energy Management
segment.
Sales, Infrastructure and Networks. This segment
corresponded to the Sales, Infrastructure and Networks division
that included our electricity and gas network operations and
carried out distribution and sales of electricity on the
regulated market and to free market customers with an annual
electricity consumption of 100 GWh or lower in Italy. It also
distributed and sold natural gas to end users and provided
public and art lighting services and electricity systems-related
services. This division also included our electricity
distribution and sales activities outside of Italy. Operating
revenues at this division derived primarily from fees for
transport of electricity and gas on our distribution networks,
the sale of electricity on the regulated and free markets and of
natural gas to end users. Electricity-related activities
included in this division were carried out in Italy primarily
through Enel Distribuzione (sale of electricity on the regulated
market and transport of electricity on our distribution
network), Deval (distribution and sales of electricity in the
Valle d’Aosta area), Enel Energia (sale of electricity on
the free market), Enel Sole (public lighting services) and
Enel.si (electricity systems-related
services). Outside of Italy this division primarily included
Electra de Enel Viesgo Distribuciņn SL and Enel Viesgo
Energia SL in Spain, Enel Electrica Dobrogea and Enel Electrica
Banat in Romania. Natural gas operations of this division were
carried out primarily through Enel Rete Gas, which distributed
natural gas in Italy, and Enel Gas, which sold natural gas to
end users in Italy. We merged Enel Distribuzione Gas, GE.AD and
Sicilmetano, Ottogas Rete and Italgestioni into Enel Rete Gas,
and Sicilmetano Energy, Ottogas Vendita and Italgestioni Gas in
Enel Gas. The operations carried out by this division have been
allocated to the new Market Division, Infrastructure and
Networks Division and International Division effective as of
January 1, 2006.
Corporate. Enel, as the parent company, defines the
strategic objectives for the Enel Group and coordinates the
activities of these divisions. In addition, Enel manages finance
operations and insurance risk coverage for all Group companies
and provides assistance and guidelines on organizational,
industrial relations, accounting, administrative, tax and legal
issues. We consider Enel as a separate reportable segment
because it holds long-term contracts to purchase imported
electricity. Until March 31, 2004, Enel sold the imported
electricity it purchases to Enel Distribuzione at prices
established by the Energy Authority. Since that date, Enel has
been required to sell this electricity to the Single Buyer.
Services and Other Activities. This segment included
non-core business operations, including Enelpower, which
provided power-related engineering and construction (or EPC)
services, and Enel Servizi (previously Enel Ape), which provides
information technology services and administration services
mainly to Group companies. Effective January 1, 2006, our
EPC activities for other Group companies that were previously
carried out by Enelpower have been transferred to our Generation
and Energy Management Division.
Discontinued Operations. Following our deconsolidation of
Terna and Wind, we have treated as discontinued operations the
Transmission segment and the Telecommunications segment. For a
description of the transactions that resulted in our exiting the
transmission business and the telecommunications business,
please see “Item 4. Information on the
Company — Business — Overview —
Discontinued Operations.” Accordingly, we treated our
transmission operations and telecommunications operations as
discontinued operations in our consolidated financial statements
for 2005.
Outlook
We expect that the ongoing liberalization of the Italian
electricity sector will continue to materially affect our
financial condition and results of operations over the next
several years.
In our generation business, the further evolution of the
electricity market following the start of operations of the
Italian power exchange in 2004 will have a significant impact on
our business in Italy. For instance, in May 2005, the Energy
Authority proposed certain possible measures to further promote
competition in the wholesale electricity market over the next
few years, including the possible sale or lease by us of
additional generating capacity to third parties. However, the
implementation of such measures has been blocked by an
administrative tribunal. Please see “Item 4.
Information on the Company — Regulatory
Matters — Electricity Regulation — The
Italian Power Exchange” and “Item 3. Key
Information — Risks Factors — Risks Relating
to our Energy Business — Regulatory changes promoting
market liberalization have significantly increased competition
in our energy businesses”. We cannot say whether other
measures will be enacted to foster competition, but they could
have a significant effect on our generation business. We are
also exposed to increased competition resulting from the
increase in the number of bilateral contracts concluded between
our competitors and final customers, the construction of new
generation facilities by our competitors and the development of
new interconnection lines that would increase the volume of
electricity that might be imported in Italy. In this context, we
intend to reduce generation costs through the conversion of
certain generation plants to run on less expensive fuels, and
the alignment of our other operating costs with international
best practice through an integrated approach to quality and
standards. We also plan to continue to increase our presence in
the market for electricity generated from renewable resources.
In our electricity distribution and sales business, we expect
that our results in Italy will continue to be affected by the
tariff regime in place for the 2004-2007 period, which includes
a price-cap mechanism imposing an annual decrease of 3.5% in the
value of operating costs and depreciation, excluding capital
costs, for
distribution services that can be recovered through tariffs. We
also expect that our sales of electricity in the regulated
market will decrease due to the ongoing liberalization of the
market, including the fact that all customers will become
eligible to purchase electricity on the free market as of
July 1, 2007. However, we expect that the impact of any
such decrease on our revenues will be offset to some extent by
increased fees paid by third parties for transport of
electricity on our network, as well as increased sales in the
free market. We intend to face these changes in the market by
continuing our program to reduce operating costs, optimizing our
investment expenditures, completing our Telemanagement project,
and strengthening our market presence (including through the
offer of new tariff plans and the roll-out of a new billing
system).
In our gas business, we intend to continue to pursue our growth
strategy by selectively acquiring additional natural gas
distribution and sales companies and through targeted marketing,
with the aim of achieving a market share in the distribution and
sale of natural gas in Italy up to 14% by 2010.
We also intend to pursue our strategy of expanding our
operations outside Italy, particularly in countries where we are
already present or where market liberalization and privatization
efforts are in progress. In this context, in April 2006, we
purchased a 66% interest in SE, the principal electric power
generation company in Slovakia, with total gross installed
generation capacity of about 7,000 MW. In addition, we have
entered into a non-binding memorandum of understanding with EDF
for an industrial partnership permitting us to invest in the
French electricity market, including in the field of nuclear
power generation. In Spain, Enel Viesgo Generacion has launched
an investment program totaling more than
€1,300 million
to convert certain coal plants to combined cycle technology. We
are also considering opportunities in the Russian market. Please
see “Item 4. Information on the Company —
Business — The Enel Group — Generation and
Energy Management — International Generation.”
You should read the sections “Strategy” and “The
Enel Group” in “Item 4. Information on the
Company — Business,”“Item 4.
Information on the Company — Regulatory Matters”
and “Item 3. Key Information — Risk
Factors” for a more detailed discussion of our strategy and
other matters affecting our business.
Sale of Wind
The treatment of the goodwill related to our telecommunications
operations (which we discontinued as a result of our disposal of
Wind) had an impact on our results from discontinued operations
in 2004.
In 2001 we acquired Infostrada, a provider of fixed line
telecommunication services, that we subsequently merged into
Wind. In 2003, we acquired the stake in Wind held by France
Télécom, and became Wind’s sole shareholder.
Under IFRS, the goodwill arising from these acquisitions is to
be subject to annual impairment tests, comparing the carrying
amount to the related market value. The IFRS results for the
year 2004 presented in our consolidated financial statements
included in this annual report reflected an impairment of
€1,671 million
in the carrying value of this goodwill, reflecting the value
attributed to Wind that was implied by the binding offer we
received from Weather Investments in April 2005. In May 2005, we
entered into an agreement pursuant to which we have sold Wind to
Weather Investments in a series of transactions. Please see
“Item 4. Information on the Company —
Business — Overview — Discontinued
Operations” for more details on our disposal of Wind.
The following table shows certain of our IFRS financial data for
the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2005, expressed in
each case as a percentage of our operating revenues:
Financial income (expense) and income (expense) from investments
(2.7
)
(2.1
)
Income (expense) from investments accounted for using the equity
method
(0.1
)
(0.1
)
Income before taxes
16.1
14.1
Income taxes
(6.8
)
(5.7
)
Income from continuing operations
9.3
8.4
Income from discontinued operations
(0.5
)
3.7
Income (before minority interests)
8.8
12.1
Net Income
8.5
%
11.4
%
Following the disposal of our controlling stakes in Wind and
Terna and their subsidiaries, which took place respectively on
August 11, 2005 and September 15, 2005, these entities
were deconsolidated as from these dates and the financial
results achieved up to the disposal date are reported under
discontinued operations.
The following table shows certain financial data from
discontinued operations for the years ended December 31,2004 and 2005, expressed in each case as a percentage of our
continuing operating revenues:
The capital gains for 2005 essentially related to the disposal
of a 43.85% interest in Terna, while the capital gains for 2004
related to the disposal of a 50% interest in Terna. All the
gains realized upon disposal of interests in Terna in 2004 and
in 2005 have therefore been reported under discontinued
operations in order to allow a consistent comparison.
In accordance with IFRS, the financial information presented for
the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004 reflects only
our continuing operations, except where specific reference is
made to discontinued operations. You should read note 5 to
our consolidated financial statements for additional information
on discontinued operations.
Operating Revenues
The following table provides a breakdown of the operating
revenues from our continuing operations for the years ended
December 31, 2005 and 2004.
Tariff revenues from sales on the regulated market and transport
of electricity on our distribution network
15,305
15,347
Sales to regulatory entities, sales on the free market and sales
on foreign markets(1)
9,776
13,548
Equalization Fund contributions
17
113
Total revenues from electricity sales
25,098
29,008
Gas sales to end users
1,374
1,556
Fees for customer connections, inspections and repositioning
services
657
656
Other revenues(2)
3,882
2,839
Total operating revenues
31,011
34,059
(1)
“Sales to regulatory entities” includes sales to
Terna, the Single Buyer (since April 1, 2004) and the
Market Operator. While sales to third-party resellers of
electricity on the free market are included in “Sales on
the free market”, this line item does not include revenues
from sales to resellers purchasing electricity for distribution
on the regulated market. Since April 1, 2004, these
resellers have been required to purchase electricity directly
from the Single Buyer. Revenues received prior to that date from
resellers purchasing electricity for distribution on the
regulated market were recorded in the line item “Tariff
revenues from sales on the regulated market and transport of
electricity on our distribution network.”
(2)
“Other revenues” mainly includes our revenues from
sales of fuel (including natural gas) to third parties,
engineering and contracting activities, and non-recurring items
such as reversals of provisions, bonus payments and
reimbursements.
Our consolidated operating revenues from continued operations
for 2005 increased by
€3,048 million,
or 9.8%, compared to 2004. As explained in more detail below,
this improvement was almost entirely due to the
€3,910 million,
or 15.6%, increase in our consolidated revenues from sales of
electricity. In addition, revenues from gas sold to end users
increased by
€182 million,
or 13.3%. The impact of these factors on our overall operating
revenues was partially offset by a decrease of
€1,043 million,
or 26.9%, in revenues from other activities.
Electricity sales
In 2005, total revenues from electricity sales increased by
€3,910 million,
or 15.6%, as compared to 2004. The increase was primarily due to
higher sales to regulatory entities, sales on the free market
and sales on foreign markets, which increased by
€3,772 million,
from
€9,776 million
to
€13,548 million.
The increase also reflected an increase of
€96 million,
from
€17 million
to
€113 million,
in equalization fund contributions and a slight increase of
€42 million,
from
€15,305 million
to
€15,347 million,
in tariffs from sales on the regulated market and transport of
electricity on our distribution network.
The increase in sales to regulatory entities primarily reflected
the fact that, following the start of operations of the Italian
power exchange and of the Single Buyer as of April 1, 2004,
sales of electricity on the regulated market were made by our
Generation and Energy Management segment to the Single Buyer,
whereas, during the first quarter of 2004, such sales were made
directly to our Sales, Infrastructure and Networks segment and
were, therefore, eliminated from our consolidated results. The
increase in sales to regulatory entities, sales on the free
market and sales on foreign markets also reflected an increase
of
€1,427 million,
or 114.5%, in revenues from international sales of electricity
(reflecting a
€669 million
increase in revenues from international trading of electricity,
a
€310 million
increase in sales on the foreign markets by our Generation and
Energy Management segment, a
€298 million
increase in revenues attributable to the first time
consolidation of Enel Electrica Banat and Enel Electrica
Dobrogea and a
€150 million
increase in sales on the Spanish market by our Sales,
Infrastructure and Networks segment). The increase in revenues
from sales to regulatory entities, sales on the free market and
sales on foreign markets also reflected an increase of
€334 million,
or 30.2%, in revenues from dispatching services and an increase
of
€59 million,
or 3.4%, in revenues from sales on the free market in Italy
(which mainly reflected increases in volumes sold to end users
with annual consumption in excess of 100 GWh per year).
Revenues from sales on the regulated market and transport of
electricity on our distribution network were substantially in
line with 2004, having increased by
€42 million,
or 0.3%.
Reimbursements received from the Equalization Fund increased by
€96 million,
primarily as a result of the fact that in 2005 we received
€100 million
related to the reimbursement of certain charges incurred in 2002
and 2003 for the purchase of green certificates. Please see
“Item 4. Information on the Company —
Regulatory Matters — Electricity
Regulation — System Charges and Other Charges”
for a description of the Equalization Fund.
Gas sales to end users
Our revenues from sales of natural gas to end users (which
exclude sales of gas to distributors and to other third parties
by Enel Trade, which are recorded in “Other revenues”)
increased by
€182 million,
or 13.3%. This increase was largely due to increased tariffs
reflecting increased market prices for natural gas.
Fees for customer connections, inspections and repositioning
services
Revenues from fees for customer connections, inspections and
repositioning services decreased slightly, by
€1 million,
or 0.2%, from 2004.
Other revenues
Other revenues decreased by
€1,043 million,
or 26.9%, primarily due to the fact that in 2004 we had recorded
revenues of
€1,068 million
on the basis of the European Commission’s approval of the
decree issued in August 2004 by the MEF and the Ministry of
Productive Activities setting the overall amount of stranded
costs we were entitled to recover (please see
“— Comparability of Information —
Regulatory and Other Developments” and “Item 4
Information on the Company — Regulatory
Matters — Electricity Regulation — Stranded
Costs”). The decrease in other revenues also reflected the
combined effect of a decrease of
€448 million,
or 50.1%, in revenues from sales of fuel to third parties, and a
€319 million,
or 52.4%, decrease in revenues from sales of engineering and
contracting services to third parties. These factors were only
partially offset by
€338 million
that we recorded in 2005 related to services provided to the
GRTN for the period 2002-2004, a
€288 million
increase in net gains from commodity risk management primarily
resulting from contracts for differences with the Single Buyer
and a
€118 million
increase in capital gains from disposal of assets.
The following table shows operating revenues for each of our
business segments for the periods presented. As a result of our
disposal of Terna and Wind, we deconsolidated Terna and Wind as
of September 15, 2005 and August 11, 2005,
respectively (please see “— Outlook —
Sale of Wind”, and “Item 4. Information on the
Company — Business — Overview —
Discontinued Operations”). Accordingly, we have eliminated
the reporta-
ble segments corresponding to these two entities, and financial
information therewith for the period prior to their respective
deconsolidation is presented as information on discontinued
operations.
Total operating revenues from continuing operations
€
31,011
€
34,059
Generation and Energy Management
In 2005, the operating revenues of our Generation and Energy
Management segment, prior to intersegment eliminations,
increased by
€1,187 million,
or 9.1%, as compared to 2004. The total revenues of the segment
of
€14,215 million
comprised revenues from its Italian operations of
€13,376 million,
revenues from its international operations of
€914 million
and eliminations for intrasegment sales of
€75 million,
which mainly related to sales of fuel by Enel Trade to our
international generation companies. The overall increase in the
segment’s revenues was primarily attributable to a
€930 million,
or 7.5%, increase, in revenues from the segment’s
operations in Italy prior to intrasegment eliminations, and a
€292 million,
or 46.9%, increase in revenues from international operations
prior to intrasegment eliminations.
The increase in revenues from Italian activities mainly
reflected a
€624 million,
or 7.5%, increase in revenues earned by Enel Produzione from
electricity sales (including revenues from dispatching
services), a
€587 million,
or 41.8%, increase in revenues from electricity sales by Enel
Trade, primarily in connection with trading activities in the
international market, the recognition in 2005 of
€338 million
related to services provided to the GRTN and Terna for the
period 2002-2004, a
€311 million
increase in net gains from commodity risk management, primarily
resulting from contracts for differences with the Single Buyer,
a
€170 million,
or 17.9%, increase in revenues from sales of natural gas to our
Sales, Infrastructure and Networks Division and the fact that in
2005 we recorded
€100 million
relating to the reimbursement of certain charges incurred in
2002 and 2003 for the purchase of green certificates. These
positive factors were offset in part by the fact that revenues
from Italian activities of this segment in 2004 included
revenues of
€513 million
related to stranded costs on our generation plants for the
period 2000-2003, and by a decline of
€448 million,
or 50.1%, in revenues from sales of fuel to third parties,
largely as a result of Enel Trade’s new focus on the supply
of gas to Group companies and by the effects of Resolution
No. 20/04 of the Energy Authority, pursuant to which we are
required to reimburse
€191 million
as a reduction of the prices charged in the sale to distributors
in March 2004.
The
€292 million
increase in revenues from international operations prior to
intrasegment eliminations reflected a
€259 million
increase in revenues earned by Enel Viesgo and a
€40 million
increase in revenues earned by EUFR (in each case, largely
resulting from an increase in generation volumes and average
sales prices).
Sales, Infrastructure and Networks
The operating revenues of our Sales, Infrastructure and Networks
segment, prior to intersegment eliminations, increased by
€1,168 million,
or 6.1%, as compared to 2004. The total revenues of the segment
of
€20,422 million
comprised revenues from Italian electricity distribution and
sales of
€17,905 million,
revenues from gas distribution and sales of
€1,602 million,
revenues from the segment’s international electricity
operations of
€913 million
and eliminations for intrasegment sales of
€2 million.
The overall increase in the segment’s revenues was
primarily attributable to a
€431 million,
or 2.5%, increase in revenues, prior to intrasegment
eliminations, from electricity distribution and sales in Italy,
a
€522 million
increase in revenues, prior to intrasegment eliminations from
sales of electricity by the segment’s international
operations, which more than
doubled, and a
€206 million,
or 14.8%, increase in revenues, prior to intrasegment
eliminations, from gas distribution and sales.
The increase in Italian electricity revenues reflected a
€553 million
increase in revenues earned by Enel Distribuzione and Deval from
electricity sales to end users, primarily due to the increase in
the component of electricity tariffs linked to the market price
for oil (please see “— Comparability of
Information — Regulatory and Other
Developments”). In addition, the increase in the Italian
electricity revenues reflected a
€168 million
increase in revenues earned by Enel Energia as a result of both
a higher volume of electricity sold and higher average prices,
and a
€89 million
increase in capital gains on disposals, primarily due to the
sale of our distribution network in the Province of Trento.
These factors were partially offset by a
€252 million
decline in sales to resellers purchasing electricity for
distribution on the regulated market as a result of the fact
that, following the start of operations of the Single Buyer in
April 2004, we no longer sell electricity to resellers for
distribution on the regulated market (which sales accounted for
€252 million
in revenues in 2004). The overall increase was also reduced by a
€135 million
decrease in the revenues recorded in connection with the bonus
scheme for continuity and quality of service performance,
primarily attributable to the fact that in 2004 we had recorded
revenues in connection with bonuses relating to services
provided in both 2004 and 2003 (please see “Item 4.
Information on the Company — Regulatory
Matters — Electricity Regulation — The
Tariff Structure” for a more detailed discussion of this
mechanism) and a
€41 million
decrease in revenues from franchising activities.
The
€522 million
increase in revenues from sales of electricity by our
international operations was attributable to the first time
consolidation of Enel Electrica Banat and Enel Electrica
Dobrogea (which recorded
€332 million
in revenues), as well as to a
€190 million
increase in revenues earned by our Spanish subsidiaries.
The
€206 million
increase in revenues from gas distribution and sales was
primarily attributable to a
€182 million,
or 13.2%, increase in revenues from gas sales to end users
reflecting increased sales prices.
Corporate
The operating revenues of our Corporate segment, prior to
intersegment eliminations, decreased by
€546 million,
or 33.1%, as compared to 2004. The decrease was largely
attributable to the fact that in 2004 we had recorded
€555 million
in revenues corresponding to the amount of reimbursement we are
entitled to receive in relation to costs we had incurred in the
period 2000-2003 related to the Nigerian LNG contract following
the approval of the decree about stranded costs mentioned above.
Services and Other Activities
The operating revenues of our Services and Other Activities
segment, prior to intersegment eliminations, decreased by
€134 million,
or 7.5%, as compared to 2004. Of the segment’s total of
€1,660 million
in operating revenues, prior to intersegment eliminations,
€804 million
were attributable to engineering and contracting,
€86 million
to real estate and related services and
€820 million
to other activities. Approximately 77.5% of these revenues were
generated by transactions with other Group companies in 2005, as
compared to 58.6% in 2004. Eliminations for intrasegment
operations in 2005 were
€50 million.
The decrease in revenues from this segment’s operations was
primarily due to a
€169 million
decrease in revenues, prior to intrasegment eliminations, from
our engineering and contracting activities reflecting their
shift in focus towards work on projects for other Group
companies rather than third parties. Other negative factors
included a decline of
€36 million
in revenues, prior to intrasegment eliminations, from real
estate and related activities, reflecting the sale of NewReal on
July 14, 2004. The overall decline was partially offset by
a
€60 million
increase in revenues, prior to intrasegment eliminations, from
our other activities, including, mainly, personnel
administration, professional training services, factoring and
water operations.
Eliminations
Eliminations in operating revenues generally relate to
intersegment sales (primarily of electricity and fuel) and
services (primarily engineering and contracting). In 2005,
eliminations decreased by
€1,373 million,
or
29.1%, as compared to 2004, mainly reflecting the fact that
sales of electricity on the regulated market were made by our
Generation and Energy Management segment to the Single Buyer
during all of 2005, whereas, during the first quarter of 2004,
such sales were made directly to our Sales, Infrastructure and
Networks segment.
Operating Expenses
The following table shows a breakdown of our operating expenses
for each of the periods presented:
As described in more detail below, our consolidated operating
expenses for 2005 increased by
€3,374 million,
or 14.7%, as compared to 2004. Expressed as a percentage of
operating revenues from our continuing operations, operating
expenses were 77.3% in 2005, as compared to 74.0% in 2004. The
increase in the absolute figure was primarily due to a
€3,941 million,
or 38.0%, increase in our expenses for purchased power,
reflecting the fact that the 2005 results reflect a full
year’s operation of the Italian power exchange, which was
introduced on April 1, 2004. The overall increase also
reflected a
€312 million,
or 8.7%, increase in costs for fuel for thermal generation, a
€128 million,
or 16.3%, increase in other costs and a
€76 million,
or 7.8%, increase in capitalized expenses. These increases were
offset in part by declines of
€462 million,
or 14.3%, in costs for personnel,
€229 million,
or 22.3%, in costs for materials and supplies,
€191 million,
or 10.6%, in costs for fuel for trading and gas for resale to
end users, and
€49 million,
or 1.6%, in costs for services and rentals.
Personnel
Personnel costs decreased by
€462 million,
or 14.3%, as compared to 2004, primarily due to a
€361 million
decrease relating to early retirement incentives, as well as to
a 3.8%, or 1,964 person, decline in the average number of
employees during the period.
Fuel for thermal generation
Costs for fuel for thermal generation increased by
€312 million,
or 8.7%, as compared to 2004, primarily reflecting a sharp
increase in the average price of fuel, which was only partially
offset by the decrease in the volume of electricity we produced
from thermal sources in Italy and our use of a less expensive
mix of fuels.
Fuel for trading and gas for resale to end users
Costs for the purchase of fuel for trading and natural gas for
sale to end users decreased by
€191 million,
or 10.6%. This decrease reflected the effect of a
€416 million
decline in costs for the purchase of fuel for trading,
consistent with lower trading volumes, which was partially
offset by a
€225 million
increase in costs for natural gas for resale to end users,
reflecting the expansion of our gas operations.
Purchased power costs increased by
€3,941 million,
or 38.0%, as the quantity of power purchased increased by 13.9%.
The increase in purchased power costs primarily reflected the
fact that the 2005 operating expenses reflect a full year’s
operation of the Italian power exchange, which was introduced on
April 1, 2004, following which our distribution companies
purchase power for sales on the regulated market exclusively
from the Single Buyer, rather than directly from our generation
companies, and our generation companies purchase from third
parties the electricity they use to power pumping at our
hydroelectric plants.
Services and rentals
Services and rentals costs decreased by
€49 million,
or 1.6%, primarily due to a
€140 million
decrease in costs relating to our engineering and construction
activities. The impact of this decrease was partially offset by
a
€36 million
increase in leasing and rental costs (mainly reflecting our July
2004 disposal of NewReal, from which we continue to lease
certain real estate assets), a
€23 million
increase in services reflecting the first time consolidation of
Enel Electrica Banat and Enel Electrica Dobrogea, a
€14 million
increase in fees for the use of water in power generation and a
€11 million
increase in costs for commercial services, primarily in our
Sales, Infrastructure and Networks segment.
Materials and supplies
Materials and supplies costs decreased by
€229 million,
or 22.3%, as compared to 2004, primarily due to a
€149 million
decline reflecting lower activities for third parties by our
engineering and contracting unit.
Other costs
Other costs increased by
€128 million,
or 16.3%, as compared to 2004, reflecting a cost of
€228 million
that we recorded in 2005 related to charges resulting from the
fact that our
CO2
emissions in 2005 exceeded the emissions quotas allocated to us
pursuant to the Emission Trading Directive and Italian and
Spanish implementing legislation. Please see “Item 4.
Information on the Company — Regulatory
Matters — Environmental Matters —
CO2
Emissions” for a discussion of these limits on
CO2
emissions.
Capitalized expenses
Capitalized expenses increased by
€76 million,
or 7.8%, as compared to 2004, primarily reflecting higher levels
of construction activity in our Generation and Energy Management
segment.
The following table shows a breakdown of our operating expenses
by business segment for each of the periods presented.
In 2005, the operating expenses of our Generation and Energy
Management segment (which primarily consist of costs for
purchased power, fuel costs, fees paid to the GRTN and Terna,
and personnel and maintenance costs for our power plants),
increased by
€1,263 million,
or 13.7%, prior to intersegment
eliminations, as compared to 2004. The segment’s total
operating expenses of
€10,511 million
comprised expenses for Italian generation of
€9,961 million,
expenses for international generation of
€624 million
and eliminations for intrasegment operations of
€74 million.
The overall increase was primarily attributable to a
€1,080 million,
or 12.2%, increase, prior to intrasegment eliminations, in
expenses for the segment’s Italian operations and a
€217 million,
or 53.3%, increase, prior to intrasegment eliminations, in
expenses for its international operations.
The increase at the segment’s Italian operations was mainly
attributable to a
€771 million,
or 42.3%, increase in costs for purchased power, a
€277 million,
or 64.5%, increase in other costs (primarily reflecting charges
for
CO2
emissions in excess of the emissions quotas allocated to us in
Italy) and a
€124 million,
or 2.4%, increase in expenses for fuel (primarily reflecting
higher average prices). These factors were partially offset by a
€154 million,
or 22.0%, decrease in personnel costs.
The increase in expenses for the segment’s international
generation operations reflected the increased scope of their
activities and primarily consisted of a
€118 million
increase in expenses for purchased power, which more than
tripled, a
€64 million,
or 33.0%, increase in expenses for fuel for thermal generation
and
€46 million
cost reflecting charges for
CO2
emissions in excess of the emissions quotas allocated to us in
Spain.
Sales, Infrastructure and Networks
In 2005, the operating expenses of our Sales, Infrastructure and
Networks segment (which primarily consist of purchases of power
and natural gas and costs associated with running our
distribution network), prior to intersegment eliminations,
increased by
€961 million,
or 6.1%, as compared to 2004. The segment’s total operating
expenses of
€16,685 million
comprised expenses of Italian electricity activities of
€14,602 million,
expenses of gas distribution and sales of
€1,360 million,
expenses of the segment’s international electricity
operations of
€721 million
and eliminations for intrasegment operations of
€2 million.
The overall increase in the segment’s expenses was
primarily attributable to a
€407 million
increase in expenses, prior to intrasegment eliminations, for
the segment’s international operations, which more than
doubled, a
€356 million,
or 2.5%, increase in expenses for electricity activities in
Italy and a
€189 million,
or 16.1%, increase in expenses, prior to intrasegment
eliminations, for gas activities.
The increase in expenses for electricity activities in Italy
primarily reflected a
€826 million,
or 8.3%, increase in costs for purchased power (largely due to
higher average purchase prices and higher volumes purchased for
the regulated market). This factor was partially offset by a
€353 million
decrease in costs for personnel, a
€90 million
decrease in costs for materials and supplies (reflecting a
decreased level of construction on our Italian electricity
distribution network) and a
€34 million
decrease in costs for services and rentals.
The increase for expenses at the segment’s international
operations was primarily attributable to a
€325 million
increase in costs for purchased power (reflecting the first time
consolidation of Enel Electrica Banat and Enel Electrica
Dobrogea — which recorded an aggregate of
€194 million
in such expenses — and increased purchase volumes at
the segment’s Spanish operations) and a
€23 million
increase in services reflecting the first time consolidation of
Enel Electrica Banat and Enel Electrica Dobrogea.
The increase in expenses for gas activities was primarily
attributable to a
€169 million
increase in costs for gas purchased for resale to end users
(reflecting higher prices), and a
€24 million
increase in costs for services and rentals.
Corporate
In 2005, the operating expenses for our Corporate segment, prior
to intersegment eliminations, increased by
€39 million,
or 3.9%, as compared to 2004, primarily due to a
€29 million
increase in costs for services and rentals and a
€27 million
increase in costs for the purchase of electricity (reflecting
higher prices). These factors were offset in part by a
€18 million
decrease in costs for personnel.
In 2005, the operating expenses of our Services and Other
Activities segment, prior to intersegment eliminations,
decreased by
€169 million,
or 10.7%, as compared to 2004, primarily reflecting a
€171 million
decrease in costs at our engineering and contracting operations,
reflecting their refocused activities. The overall decline in
this segment’s expenses also reflected a
€16 million
decrease in costs at our real estate activities, primarily
reflecting the sale of NewReal. Operating expenses for other
activities (such as personnel administration, professional
training services, factoring and water activities) increased by
€6 million.
Eliminations for intrasegment operations in 2005 were
€50 million
(€61 million
in 2004).
Eliminations
Eliminations for operating expenses principally consist of the
elimination of intersegment electricity and fuel purchases and
costs for the provision of intersegment services. In 2005, the
decrease in eliminations of
€1,280 million,
or 27.8%, as compared to 2004, mainly reflected the fact that
since the introduction of the Single Buyer in April 2004, our
Sales, Infrastructure and Networks segment purchases most of the
electricity it sells directly from the Single Buyer, rather than
from our Generation and Energy Management segment.
Depreciation, Amortization and Impairment
The following table shows depreciation, amortization and
impairment expenses for each of our business segments for each
of the periods presented:
Depreciation, amortization and impairment expenses in 2005
increased by
€6 million,
or 0.3%, as compared to 2004. The increase primarily reflected a
€122 million
increase in such expenses at our Sales, Infrastructure and
Networks segment that was primarily due to a
€93 million
increase related to the Italian electricity operations of the
segment, a
€18 million
increase related to the international operations of the segment
(mainly reflecting the first time consolidation of Enel
Electrica Banat and Enel Electrica Dobrogea) and a
€11 million
increase related to our gas distribution and sales activity.
These factors were partially offset by a
€110 million
decrease in depreciation, amortization and impairment expenses
at our Generation and Energy Management segment (primarily
arising from the upward revision of our estimates of the useful
lives of certain assets, as described in “The Electricity
Market Regulatory Framework — Comparability of
Information — Regulatory and Other Developments”
above (see also “The Electricity Market Regulatory
Framework — Critical Accounting Policies”)).
Operating income decreased by
€332 million,
or 5.7%, as compared to 2004, reflecting a
€594 million
decrease in the operating income earned by our Corporate
segment, which was only partially offset by increases in the
operating income earned by our Sales, Infrastructure and
Networks, Generation and Energy Management and Services and
Other Activities segments.
Generation and Energy Management
The operating income of our Generation and Energy Management
segment, prior to intersegment eliminations, increased by
€34 million,
or 1.3%, as compared to 2004. The segment’s operating
income comprised operating income from Italian generation
operations of
€2,403 million
and operating income from international operations of
€162 million.
The overall increase in the segment’s operating income
reflected a
€66 million,
or 68.8%, increase in operating income from its international
generation operations that was partially offset by a
€32 million,
or 1.3%, decrease in operating income from its Italian
generation operations.
The decrease in operating income from Italian generation
activities primarily reflected the fact that revenues from
Italian activities of this segment in 2004 included
€513 million
related to stranded costs on our generation plants for the
period 2000-2003, the effect of the
€191 million
we are required to reimburse pursuant to the Resolution
No. 20/04 of the Energy Authority (as explained above) and
a
€182 million
charge in 2005 for
CO2
emissions in excess of the emissions quotas allocated to us.
This decrease was partially offset by the effect of the
€338 million
revenues related to services provided in the period 2002-2004
(as explained above), a
€311 million
increase in net income from commodity risk management, a
€115 million
decrease in depreciation, amortization and impairment primarily
due to the upward revision of our estimates of the useful lives
of certain power plants and
€100 million
revenues relating to the reimbursement of certain charges
incurred in 2002 and 2003.
The increase in operating income generated by the international
generation operations of the segment was primarily attributable
to a
€31 million
increase in operating income at Enel Viesgo and a
€25 million
increase in operating income at EUFR.
Sales, Infrastructure and Networks
The operating income of our Sales, Infrastructure and Networks
segment, prior to intersegment eliminations, increased by
€85 million,
or 3.2%, as compared to 2004. Total operating income of the
segment comprised
€2,487 million
of operating income from Italian electricity distribution and
sales,
€143 million
of operating income from international operations, and
€148 million
of operating income from gas distribution and sales.
The overall increase in the segment’s operating income was
primarily attributable to a
€97 million
increase in operating income from international electricity
distribution and sales operations (which more than doubled),
mainly due to the first time consolidation of Enel Electrica
Banat and Enel Electrica Dobrogea (which recorded aggregate
operating income of
€70 million).
The overall increase also reflected a
€6 million,
or 4.2%, increase in
the operating income from gas distribution and sales. These
factors were offset in part by a
€18 million
decrease in operating income from Italian electricity
distribution and sales.
Corporate
The operating income of our Corporate segment, prior to
intersegment eliminations, decreased by
€594 million,
or 91.8%, as compared to 2004, mainly due to the fact that in
2004 we had recorded
€555 million
in revenues corresponding to the amount of reimbursement we were
entitled to receive in relation to costs we had incurred in the
period 2000-2003 related to the Nigerian LNG contract following
the approval of decree about stranded costs mentioned above.
Services and Other Activities
The operating income of our Services and Other Activities
segment, prior to intersegment eliminations, increased by
€48 million,
or 45.3%, as compared to 2004. The overall increase reflected a
general increase in income from the segment’s businesses
other than real estate which recorded a
€12 million
decline, mainly reflecting the deconsolidation of NewReal, as of
July 14, 2004.
Eliminations
Intersegment eliminations for operating income mainly related to
income from our engineering and contracting activities arising
from transactions with companies in our Generation and Energy
Management segment.
Financial Income/ Expense and Income/ Expenses from
Investments
Net financial expenses and net expenses from investments (which
relate to our investments not accounted for using the equity
method) decreased by
€113 million,
or 13.7% (from
€827 million
in 2004 to
€714 million
in 2005). The decrease was primarily attributable to a
€97 million
decrease in our net financial expenses, reflecting a decrease in
the average amount of our net financial debt over the period.
Please see “— Liquidity and Capital
Resources — Capital Resources” for additional
information about our debt in 2005.
Income/ Expense from Investments Accounted For Using The
Equity Method
Expenses from investments increased by
€5 million,
or 20.0% (from
€25 million
in 2004 to
€30 million
in 2005). The increase primarily reflected the impact of the
equity method evaluation of Wind and of the fair value valuation
of our put option in connection with Wind’s shares, which
accounted for a net expense of
€37 million.
You should read note 9 to our consolidated financial
statements for additional information on income/expense from
investments accounted for using the equity method.
Income Taxes
The following table shows a breakdown of our income tax expenses
for the periods indicated.
Difference on estimated income tax from prior years
(14
)
14
Deferred tax assets
459
277
Deferred tax liabilities
343
245
Total
2,116
1,934
Estimated income tax expenses from our continuing operations
decreased by
€182 million,
or 8.6%, compared to 2004, from
€2,116 million
to
€1,934 million.
The decrease was mainly attributable to a
€182 million
decrease in deferred tax assets primarily relating to accruals
to provisions for risk and charges and impairment losses with
deferred deductibility, a
€98 million
decrease in deferred tax liabilities mainly due to the reduction
of depreciation charged for tax purposes including accelerated
depreciation and impairment of investments and a
€70 million
increase in current taxes due to higher income before taxes. The
decrease in income tax from continuing operations was partially
offset by a
€21 million
increase in foreign income taxes, which amounted to
€43 million
in 2005, as compared to
€22 million
in 2004.
You should read note 10 to consolidated financial
statements for more details on our income taxes and effective
tax rate.
Income/loss from discontinued operations
We recorded income from discontinued operations of
€1,272 million
in 2005, as compared to a loss of
€155 million
in 2004. The increase primarily reflected the fact that in 2004
we recorded a loss primarily due a
€1,671 million
impairment on our stake in Wind. Please see “Item 4
Information on the Company — Business —
Overview — Discontinued Operations” and
“— Business Segments —
Outlook — Sale of Wind” for additional
information on this impairment. The impact of this factor in
2004 was only partially offset by the capital gain of
€812 million
we recorded on disposal of a 50% stake in Terna. The 2005
increase also reflected a capital gain in 2005 of
€1,153 million
on disposals (mainly reflecting our disposal of a 43.85% stake
in Terna).
Net income
Net income represents our income from continuing operations
after taxes plus income from discontinued operations after taxes
minus minority stockholders’ interest. Net income increased
by
€1,264 million,
or 48.0%, from
€2,631 million
in 2004 to
€3,895 million
in 2005. This increase was primarily due to a
€1,427 million
increase in income from discontinued operations, a
€113 million
decrease in net financial expenses and expenses from investments
and a
€182 million
decrease in our income taxes. The positive effects of these
factors on our net income were partially offset by a
€332 million
decrease in our operating income and a
€5 million
increase in the expenses in investments accounted for using the
equity method. The change in the result attributable to minority
interests (from
€116 million
in 2004 to
€237 million
in 2005) primarily reflected our sale of Terna.
Inflation
The tariffs for sales of electricity in effect over the periods
covered by the financial statements included in this annual
report were not adjusted for inflation. Inflation in Italy was
2.2% in 2004, and 1.9% in 2005. As a result, the real value of
the tariffs decreased over time.
U.S. GAAP Reconciliation
We have prepared our consolidated financial statements in
accordance with IFRS, which differ in certain respects from
U.S. GAAP. The principal differences between IFRS and
U.S. GAAP, as applied to our consolidated financial
statements, relate to the following:
You should read note 21 to our consolidated financial
statements for a more detailed discussion of the principal
differences between IFRS and U.S. GAAP that affect our
consolidated financial statements and for a reconciliation of
net income and shareholders’ equity between IFRS and
U.S. GAAP; and note 22 to our consolidated financial
statements for additional U.S. GAAP disclosures.
Our consolidated net income under U.S. GAAP was
approximately
€1,031 million
in 2004 and
€4,698 million
in 2005, as compared to consolidated net income under IFRS of
€2,631 million
in 2004 and
€3,895 million
in 2005. Our shareholders’ equity under U.S. GAAP was
€15,697 million
at December 31, 2004 and
€17,638 million
in at December 31, 2005, as compared with
shareholders’ equity under IFRS of
€17,953 million
at December 31, 2004 and
€19,057 million
at December 31, 2005.
Critical Accounting Policies under U.S. GAAP
In addition to the critical accounting policies discussed above
under “The Electricity Market Regulatory
Framework — Critical Accounting Policies,”
management considers that the following critical accounting
policies in the reconciliation of net income and
shareholders’ equity between IFRS and U.S. GAAP
require reliance upon significant judgments, estimates and
assumptions.
Recoverability of goodwill. For U.S. GAAP, we
adopted the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting
Standard SFAS No. 142 (FASB 142), “Goodwill and
Other Intangible Assets,” as of January 1, 2002, which
did not result in any impairment as of that date. SFAS 142
requires that goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite
useful lives no longer be amortized and that goodwill be tested
for impairment at least annually (and between annual tests when
certain triggering events occur) using a two-step approach at
the reporting unit level. Reporting units may be tested at
different times during the year. The first step involves
comparing the fair value of the reporting unit to its book
value, including goodwill and intangible assets. The
determination of fair value of each reporting unit is based on
the present value of future cash flows and requires significant
judgment. If the fair value of the reporting unit is less than
its book value, a second step is required to be performed
comparing the implied fair values to the book values of the
reporting units’ goodwill. The implied fair value of the
goodwill is the difference between the fair value of the
reporting unit and the net fair values of the recognized and
unrecognized intangible identifiable assets and liabilities of
the reporting unit. The fair value of intangible assets with
indefinite lives is determined based on expected discounted
future cash flows. If the fair value of goodwill and other
intangible assets with indefinite lives are less than their book
values, the differences are recorded as impairment charges. With
regard to our telecommunications reporting unit, the annual
impairment test which was performed at June 30, 2002,
resulted in us recording impairment charges of
€2,336 million
under U.S. GAAP related to goodwill during the year ended
December 31, 2002. No such impairment resulted from the
similar testing performed in 2003. The annual impairment test
performed at June 30, 2004 did not result in an impairment.
However, due to a change in circumstances that we believed would
more likely than not reduce the fair value of the reporting unit
below its carrying amount, we performed a new impairment test at
December 31, 2004, which resulted in the recording of
impairment charges under U.S. GAAP of
€3,393 million.
Accounting for derivatives. In 1998, the Financial
Accounting Standards Board (FASB), issued SFAS 133,
“Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities.” SFAS 133 was later amended by
SFAS 137 and 138 (collectively referred to as
SFAS 133). For U.S. GAAP purposes only, we use the
criteria in SFAS 133, as amended and interpreted, to
determine if certain contracts must be accounted for as
derivative instruments. The rules for determining whether a
contract meets the criteria for derivative accounting are
numerous and complex. As a result, significant judgment is
required to determine whether a contract requires derivative
accounting, and similar contracts can sometimes be accounted for
differently. The types of contracts we currently account for as
derivative instruments are interest rate swaps and locks,
foreign currency exchange contracts, call options and swaps. We
do not account for electric capacity, gas supply contracts, or
purchase orders for numerous supply items as derivatives. If a
contract must be accounted for as a derivative instrument, the
contract is recorded as either an asset or a liability in the
financial statements at the fair value of the contract. Any
difference between the recorded book value and the fair value is
reported either in earnings or in other comprehensive income
depending on certain qualifying criteria. The recorded fair
value of the contract is then adjusted quarterly to reflect any
change in the market value of the contract. In order to value
the contracts that are accounted for as derivative instruments,
we use a combination of market quoted prices and mathematical
models. Option models require various inputs, including forward
prices, volatilities, interest rates and exercise periods.
Changes in forward prices or volatilities could significantly
change the calculated fair value of the call option contracts.
The models we use have been tested against market quotes to
ensure consistency between model outputs and market quotes. For
derivative instruments to qualify for hedge accounting under
SFAS 133, the hedging relationship must be formally
documented at inception and be highly effective in achieving
offsetting cash flows or offsetting changes in fair value
attributable to the risk being hedged. If hedging a forecasted
transaction, the forecasted transaction must be probable. If a
derivative instrument used as a cash flow hedge is terminated
early because it is probable that a forecasted transaction will
not occur, any gain or loss as of such date is immediately
recognized in earnings. If a derivative instrument used as a
cash flow hedge is terminated early for other economic reasons,
any gain or loss as of the termination date is deferred and
recorded when the forecasted transaction affects earnings.
Recoverability of intangible assets and other long-term
assets. Under U.S. GAAP, in order to test the
recoverability of intangible assets and other long term assets,
we apply SFAS No. 144, “Accounting for the
Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets.” We estimate
the useful lives of intangible and other long-term assets based
on the nature of the asset, historical experience and the terms
of any related supply contracts. We test for impairment by
comparing the sum of the future undiscounted cash flows expected
to be received or derived from an asset or a group of assets to
their carrying value. If the carrying value exceeds the future
undiscounted cash flows, the impairment is measured using an
estimation of the assets’ fair value, primarily using a
discounted cash flow method. The identification of indicators of
impairment, the estimation of future cash flow and the
determination of fair values for assets or groups of assets
require management to make significant judgments concerning the
identification and validation of impairment indicators, expected
cash flows and appropriate discount rates. A significant change
to these assumptions could impact the estimated useful lives or
valuation of intangible and other long-term assets resulting in
a change to amortization expense and impairment charges.
New U.S. GAAP Accounting Standards
In addition to the critical accounting policies discussed above
under “The Electricity Market Regulatory
Framework — Critical Accounting Policies” and
“— Critical Accounting Policies under
U.S. GAAP,” our future U.S. GAAP results will be
affected by a number of new accounting standards that have been
recently issued.
Variable interest entities. In March 2005 the FASB issued
a Staff Position No. FIN 46 (R)-5 addressing whether
reporting enterprise should consider if it holds also an
implicit variable interest in a variable interest entity or
potential variable interest entity. An implicit interest is an
implied pecuniary interest in an entity that changes in the fair
value of entity’s net assets exclusive of variable
interest. The determination of whether and implicit variable
interest exists is a matter of judgment that depends on the
relevant facts and circumstances. For entities to which
Interpretation 46 (R) has been applied, the guidance in this FSP
shall be applied in the first reporting period beginning after
March 3, 2005. For entities to which Interpretation 46 (R)
has not been applied, the guidance in this FSP shall be applied
in accordance with the effective date and transition provisions
of Interpretation 46 (R).
In June 2005, the emerging issues task force has reached a
consensus on
EITF 04-5,
Determining whether a General Partner, or General Partners as a
group, controls a Limited Partnership or similar entity when the
limited partners have certain rights. General Partner is
presumed to control limited partnership regardless of its
ownership interest. Presumption of control by the general
partner is overcome if (a) the limited partners have the
substantive ability to liquidate partnership or (b) the
limited partners have substantive participating rights. In July
2005, the FASB amended AICPA Statement of Position 78-9 with FSP
No. SOP 78-9-1 to be consistent with the consensus
in EITF 04-5. The
consensus is effective for all new limited partnership
subsequent to June 29, 2005 and for the first reporting
period beginning after December 15, 2005 for all other
limited partnerships. We do not believe that the adoption of
EITF 04-5 will
have a significant impact on our consolidated financial
statements.
Financial instruments with characteristics of both
liabilities and equity. In June 2005, the FASB Staff issued
the FASB Staff Position FAS 150-5 to address whether
freestanding warrants or other similar instruments on shares
that are redeemable would be subject to the requirement of FASB
Statement No. 150, regardless of the timing of the
redemption feature or the redemption price. The guidance on this
FSP shall be applied to the first reporting period beginning
after June 30, 2005. The adoption of this FSP is expected
not to have a significant impact on our consolidated financial
statements.
Other than temporary impairment of investments. In March
2004, the EITF reached a consensus on
EITF 03-1,
“The Meaning of Other-Than-Temporary Impairment and Its
Application to Certain Investments,”
EITF 03-1
addresses the meaning of other than temporary impairment and its
application to investments classified as either
available-for-sale or
held-to-maturity under
SFAS 115, “Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt
and Equity Securities,” and investments accounted for under
the cost method or the equity method. A consensus was reached on
how to evaluate when an impairment of securities or investments
is other than temporary. A previous consensus in November 2003
addressed certain quantitative and qualitative disclosures about
unrealized losses pertaining to debt and equity securities
classified as available-for-sale or
held-to-maturity. In
September 2004, the FASB delayed the effective date for
application of the recognition and measurement provisions of
EITF 03-1 to
investments in securities that are impaired until additional
guidance is issued. In November 2005, the FASB issued FSP
FAS 115-1/124-1. This FASB Staff Position nullifies certain
requirements of
Issue 03-1 and
carries forward some other requirements from the same Issue. The
guidance in this FSP shall be applied to reporting periods
beginning after December 15, 2005. Certain disclosure
requirements from
EITF 03-1 are
still in effect.
Guidance in Determining Whether to Report Discontinued
Operations. In November 2004, the EITF reached a consensus
on EITF 03-13,
“Applying the Conditions in Paragraph 42 of FASB
No. 144 in Determining Whether to Report Discontinued
Operations.”
EITF 03-13
addresses how an ongoing entity should evaluate whether the
operations and cash flows of a disposed component have been or
will be eliminated from the ongoing operations of the entity,
and the types of continuing involvement that constitute
significant continuing involvement in the operations of the
disposed component. If continuing cash flows are determined to
be direct, then the cash flows have not been eliminated and the
operations of the component should not be presented as
discontinued operations. If continuing cash flows are determined
to be indirect, then the cash flows are considered to be
eliminated and the operations of the component should be
presented as discontinued operations. In order to determine the
significance of the continuing involvement, consideration must
be given to the ability to influence the operating and or
financial policies of the disposed component, as well as the
retention of risk or the ability to obtain benefits. We applied
the provisions of
EITF 03-13 to
components of an enterprise that are either disposed of or
classified a held for sale beginning January 1, 2005, and
consequently we did not present the disposal of Wind and Terna
as discontinued operations.
Share-Based Payments. In December 2004, the FASB issued
SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004), Share-Based
Payment, which is a revision of SFAS No. 123,
Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation.
SFAS No. 123(R) supersedes APB Opinion No. 25,
Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and amends
SFAS No. 95, Statement of Cash Flows.
Generally, the approach in SFAS No. 123(R) is similar
to the approach described in SFAS No. 123. However,
SFAS No. 123(R) requires all share-based payments to
employees, including grants of employee stock options, to be
recognized in the income statement based on their fair values.
Pro forma disclosure is no longer an alternative. Also,
SFAS No. 123(R) provides significant additional
guidance regarding the valuation of employee stock options.
While SFAS No. 123(R) does not require the use of a
specific option-pricing model, it does indicate that lattice
models usually will provide a better estimate of fair value of
an employee stock option.
SFAS No. 123(R) must be adopted by us no later than
January 1, 2006. Early adoption is permitted in periods in
which financial statements have not yet been issued. We do not
believe that the adoption of SFAS No. 123(R) will have
a significant impact on our consolidated financial statements.
Exchanges of Nonmonetary Assets. In December 2004, the
FASB issued SFAS Statement No. 153, which eliminates
an exception in APB 29 for nonmonetary exchanges of similar
productive assets and replaces it with a general exception for
exchanges of nonmonetary assets that do not have commercial
substance. This Statement will be effective for us for
nonmonetary asset exchanges occurring on or after
January 1, 2006. We are still evaluating the impact on our
financial statements.
Determining the Amortization period for leasehold
improvements. In June 2005, the EITF reached a consensus on
EITF 05-6,
Determining the amortization period for leasehold
improvements. The issue is how to determine the amortization
period for leasehold improvements acquired subsequent to
inception of lease, including leasehold improvement acquired in
a business combination. For both cases the Task Force reached
the consensus that the leasehold improvements acquired should be
amortized over the shorter of the useful life of the assets and
the hypothetical lease term. This consensus does not apply to
preexisting improvements and it is effective for reporting
periods beginning after June 29, 2005. We do not believe
that the adoption of
EITF 05-6 will
have a significant impact on our consolidated financial
statements.
Accounting for Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income. In
July 2005, the Board issued FASB Staff Position APB 18-1:
Accounting by an investor for its proportionate share of
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income of an investee accounted
for under the Equity Method in accordance with APB 18 upon
a loss of significant influence. The Board believes that an
investor’s proportionate share of an investee’s equity
adjustments for OCI should be offset against the carrying value
of the investment at the time significant influence is lost. The
guidance on this FSP is effective as of the first reporting
period beginning after July 12, 2005. We do not believe
that the adoption of SFAS 154 will have a significant
impact on our consolidated financial statements.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Cash Flow Analysis
The main factor that affected the comparability of our cash
flows in 2005 and 2004 is the fact that our cash flow for 2005
reflected the cash flows of Wind and Terna until the date on
which we deconsolidated these companies (August 11 and
September 15, 2005, respectively), while our cash flow for
2004 reflected cash flows of these companies for the whole year.
Please see “Item 4. Information on the
Company — Business — Discontinued
Operations” and note 5 to our consolidated financial
statements for additional information about the transactions
which resulted in the deconsolidation of these companies.
Our primary source of liquidity is cash generated from
operations. Net cash provided by operating activities was
€5,693 million
in 2005, as compared to
€4,835 million
in 2004. The increase of
€858 million,
or 17.7%, was primarily attributable to a
€459 million
decrease in taxes paid, primarily reflecting the fact that in
2004 we paid an aggregate of
€579 million
relating to taxes on
freeing-up of reserves,
revaluation of assets and tax amnesties, and a
€408 million
decrease in interest and other financial expense paid, primarily
attributable to a decrease in average financial indebtedness due
to the deconsolidation of Wind and Terna.
Net cash provided by investing activities was
€1,092 million
in 2005, as compared to
€1,953 million
of cash used in investment activities in 2004. The change was
primarily attributable to a
€2,711 million
increase in cash provided by disposals of entities (net of cash
and cash equivalents), primarily reflecting our disposal of a
62.75% stake in Wind and of a 43.85% stake in Terna, which
accounted for
€2,938 million
(net of
€48 million
in cash and cash equivalents sold) and
€1,518 million
(net of
€365 million
in cash and cash equivalents sold) respectively. Our sale of a
50% stake in Terna had a positive cash effect of
€1,700 million
in 2004. The change also reflected a
€501 million
decrease in investments in property, plant and equipment,
primarily due to the deconsolidation of Wind and Terna, a
€163 million
increase in cash from the disposal of entities, attributable to
the sale of electricity distribution networks, a
€155 million
increase in cash from minor investments in other activities,
from
€66 million
in 2004 to
€221 million
in 2005, mainly due to ordinary divestments for
€189 million
and to the disposal of certain minor companies of the Service
and Other Activities Segment for
€39 million,
and a
€76 million
decrease in investment in intangible assets, primarily due to
the deconsolidation of Wind and Terna. These positive factors
were partially offset by a
€398 million
increase in investment in entities, mainly due to the
acquisitions (for an aggregate of
€524 million,
net of
€110 million
of cash and cash equivalents) of a 5.2% stake
in Weather for
€305 million,
a 66% stake in Slovenské Elecktrarne for
€168 million,
a 51% stake in each of Enel Electrica Banat and Enel Electrica
Dobrogea for
€116 million
and the purchase of some gas companies for an aggregate of
€23 million.
Cash and cash equivalents relating to the purchase of entities
are primarily attributable to Enel Electrica Banat and Enel
Electrica Dobrogea. Please see note 3 of our notes to
consolidated financial statements for additional information on
the effect of these acquisition on our cash flow.
Net cash used in financing activities was
€6,654 million
in 2005, as compared to
€2,966 million
in 2004. The increase of
€3,688 million
was primarily attributable to a
€2,227 million
decrease in new financing and a
€2,336 million
decrease in repayments and other changes, that were primarily
due to the deconsolidation of Wind and Terna. The increase was
partially offset by a
€784 million
decrease in dividends paid (which also included interim
dividends paid) and by a
€98 million
change in increase in share capital and reserves due to exercise
of stock options.
The overall result of these cash flows was a
€145 million
increase in cash and cash equivalents, as compared to a
€89 million
decrease in 2004.
We met our cash requirements for our investing activities and
financing activities primarily through cash generated from
operations.
Capital Resources
We manage our financing requirements through our centralized
treasury department. Most of the financing transactions of our
divisions are centralized and netted at the Group level in order
to reduce our overall debt and interest expense. As a general
rule, external financing is incurred at the parent company level
(either directly by Enel or through a treasury vehicle with a
guarantee from Enel) in the form of bonds and other debt
securities, bank loans and lines of credit. Our treasury
department then makes cash available to Group companies on an as
needed basis through intercompany loans or current-account
arrangements. In limited circumstances, financings are
undertaken directly by our subsidiaries, including subsidized
loans granted by the European Investment Bank to our operating
subsidiaries to finance a specific project. We also issue bonds
and commercial paper through a treasury vehicle (which was Enel
Investment Holding BV until November 2005 and is now Enel
Finance International SA). The principal goals of our treasury
operations are to maximize financing efficiency and minimize
structural subordination issues that would arise if significant
external debt was held at the operating subsidiary level, as
well as optimizing cash flows for all the companies of the Group
on a daily basis.
At December 31, 2005, our outstanding long-term debt,
including current maturities, was
€11,985 million,
as compared to
€21,822 million
at December 31, 2004. The decrease of
€9,837 million,
or 45.1%, was primarily attributable to the deconsolidation of
Wind and Terna. Repayments of long-term debt in 2005 totaled
€3,658 million,
and were primarily comprised of payments at scheduled
maturities, including those of a fixed-rate bond issued by Enel
S.p.A. with a total principal amount of
€750 million
and drawdowns under floating rate revolving bank facility of
Enel with a total principal amount of
€1,430 million.
The decrease was partially offset by new loans with a total
principal amount of
€664 million,
the issue of a 7-year
fixed-rate bond by Enel with a total principal amount of
€600 million,
the issue of a 7-year
floating rate bond by Enel with a total principal amount of
€400 million
and the drawdown under our revolving credit facility of
€100 million.
At December 31, 2005, our outstanding short-term debt was
€1,362 million,
as compared to
€5,240 million
at December 31, 2004. The decrease of
€3,878 million,
or 74.0%, reflected a
€2,211 million
decrease in the outstanding amount of commercial paper, a
€400 million
decrease in funds drawn on our revolving credit lines, a
€1,192 million
decrease in the amount of other short-term financings and a
decrease of
€75 million
in other short-term financial loans. You should read
notes 13 and 14 to our consolidated financial statements
for a further discussion of our long-term and short-term debt,
including information on maturity profiles, relevant covenants,
and other restrictions on their use.
At December 31, 2005, our net financial indebtedness, which
we calculate on the basis of our short and long-term debt
(including current maturities), less long-term guarantee
deposits, cash at banks and marketable securities, factoring
receivables and finance receivables from associated companies,
was
€12,396 million,
comprised of net long-term debt of
€11,919 million
(including current maturities) and net short-term debt of
€477 million.
The decrease in net financial indebtedness of
€12,302 million,
or 49.8%, as compared to
€24,698 million
at December 31, 2004, reflected the combination of a
€8,305 million
decrease in our net long-term debt and a
€3,997 million
decrease in our net short-term debt. The decrease in our net
financial indebtedness is primarily due to the deconsolidation
of Wind and Terna, following the disposal of a 62.75% stake in
Wind and a 43.85% stake in Terna.
Although net financial indebtedness is a non-GAAP measure, it is
widely used by Italian financial institutions and securities
analysts to assess a company’s liquidity and the adequacy
of its financial structure. We therefore believe it is useful to
provide this information to investors together with, and not in
lieu of, the analysis of our outstanding debt under IFRS
provided above. The following table details our net financial
indebtedness at December 31, 2004 and 2005, and provides a
reconciliation of this non-GAAP measure to “cash at banks
and marketable securities” the most directly comparable
GAAP measure appearing in our consolidated statements of cash
flows. The parenthetical references to notes following
particular line items in the table are to the specific notes to
our consolidated financial statements included in Item 18
where these line items are presented in greater detail.
Long-term debt (including current maturities)
(note 10):
Bank loans
11,672
3,195
Bonds
9,776
8,599
Other loans
374
191
Total Long-Term Debt (including current maturities)
22,822
11,985
Long-term receivables
(1,598
)
(66
)
Net Long-Term Debt (including current maturities)
20,224
11,919
Net Financial Indebtedness
24,698
12,396
We maintain committed lines of credit for
€6,325 million
(€6,225 million
of which were unused as of December 31, 2005) and
uncommitted lines of credit and other short-term borrowing
agreements with banks in Italy and Spain with maximum borrowing
limits aggregating
€3,368 million
as of December 31, 2005
(€2,398 million
of which were unused as of that date). In November 2005, we
entered into a new
5-year revolving
committed line of credit for
€5,000 million,
replacing a previous
€3,000 million
line of credit entered into in December 2003 (of which
€1,000 million
was available for only one year and
€2,000 million
was available for five years). The new line, which is available
on a revolving basis until December 2010 with an option to
extend it year by year had not been utilized, as of
December 31, 2005. The weighted average interest rate on
our short-term borrowings was approximately 2.51% as of
December 31, 2005, as compared to approximately 2.21% as of
December 31, 2004. We believe that our bank facilities,
together with our portfolio of cash and cash equivalents, are
sufficient to meet our present working capital needs.
At December 31, 2005, only 4.0% of our long-term debt
(including current maturities) was denominated in currencies
other than the euro, including the equivalent of
€263 million
of long-term debt which relates to our operating subsidiaries in
North America and Central and South America that is primarily
denominated in U.S. dollars. At the same date, 12.2% of our
long-term debt was guaranteed as to principal and interest by
the Italian government. At December 31, 2005, 48.6% of our
long-term debt bore interest at floating rates and 51.4% bore
interest at fixed rates. To improve our mix of floating and
fixed-rate obligations, we have entered into certain interest
rate hedging transactions, particularly interest rate swaps,
swaptions and collars. Taking these hedging positions into
account, we have estimated that we are exposed to interest rate
fluctuations with respect to approximately 16.2% of our
outstanding long-term debt. Please see “Item 11.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market
Risk — Price Risk Management and Market Risk
Information” for a more detailed discussion of our hedging
policies. Without giving effect to these arrangements, we
estimate that the weighted average interest rate on our
outstanding long-term debt as of December 31, 2005 was
approximately 3.9%, as compared to approximately 3.8% as of
December 31, 2004.
On November 15, 2005, we renewed our Euro medium-term note
program and substituted Enel Investment Holding BV with Enel
Finance International SA as second issuer under this program
(with the guarantee of Enel). The program has a maximum
aggregate authorized amount that may be outstanding at one time
of
€10,000 million.
The terms of this program allow both Enel and our finance
subsidiary Enel Finance International SA, with the guarantee of
Enel, to issue bonds to retail investors in Italy and certain
countries outside of the United States and to institutional
investors (including qualified institutional buyers in the
United States). In 2002, Enel issued 11 series of
euro-denominated bonds with an aggregate principal amount of
€617 million
and three Japanese yen-denominated series of bonds with an
aggregate principal amount equivalent to
€118 million
at the date of issue. In 2003, Enel Investment Holding BV issued
nine series of euro-denominated bonds with an aggregate
principal amount of
€780 million,
one series of British pound-denominated bonds with a principal
amount of British pounds 40 million (equivalent to
€58 million
at the date of issue), and Enel issued
€750 million
of 4.75% fixed-rate fifteen-year bonds and
€750 million
of 4.25% fixed-rate ten-year bonds. In 2004, Enel issued
€750 million
of 4.125% fixed-rate seven-year bonds and
€750 million
of 5.25% fixed-rate twenty-year bonds, and Enel Investment
Holding BV issued one series of 5.6% fixed-rate twenty-five year
euro-denominated bonds with a principal amount of
€150 million.
Finally, in 2005, Enel issued
€400 million
of floating rate Euribor plus 0.1% seven-year bonds and
€600 million
of 3.625% fixed-rate seven-year bonds. As of December 31,2005, an aggregate of
€4,723 million
in principal amount of notes was outstanding under our euro
medium-term note program. The currency risk relating to the
placement of the Japanese yen-denominated bonds and the British
pound-denominated bonds has been hedged through currency swaps
entered into at the date of the issue. Please see
“Item 11. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure
About Market Risk — Price Risk Management and Market
Risk Information” for a more detailed discussion of our
hedging policies. You should see notes 13 and 14 to our
financial statements for additional information about our debt
securities, including maturities.
At December 31, 2005, a total of
€276 million
in commercial paper issued by our subsidiary Enel Investment
Holding BV with the guarantee of Enel was outstanding under a
multi-currency program with an aggregate authorized amount of
€2,500 million.
In November 2005, such program was modified, increasing the
aggregate amount up to
€4,000 million
and replacing Enel Investment Holding BV with Enel Finance
International SA as issuer of commercial paper, maintaining Enel
as guarantor. Of this outstanding amount,
€240 million
was denominated in Euro and
€36 million
in British pounds. We have entered into currency swaps to hedge
foreign exchange risk in connection with the portion of this
debt denominated in currency other than the Euro.
Our borrowing requirements are not seasonal.
We use short-term borrowing facilities in order to finance our
working capital needs, aiming at ensuring flexible and
cost-effective financing for all companies of the Group.
The following table shows the ratings of our short-term debt and
long-term debt according to Standard & Poor’s and
Moody’s Investors Service at June 26, 2006.
Long-Term
Short-Term
Rating Agency
Debt
Debt
Outlook
Standard & Poor’s
A+
A-1
Negative
Moody’s Investors Service
Aa3
P-1
Stable
Future Liquidity and Capital Resources
The Group has adopted formal policies and decision-making
processes aimed at optimizing the Group’s overall financial
situation and its allocation of financial resources, cash
management processes and financial risk management, as well as
ensuring sustainable levels of indebtedness.
We expect that operating cash flow will continue to be the
primary source of funds for our capital expenditures and working
capital requirements in 2006 and that the cash received from
divestitures will support our acquisitions.
We believe that our cash flow and available liquid funds and
credit lines will be sufficient to meet our anticipated cash
needs.
The following transactions have impacted or are likely to impact
our liquidity and capital resources in 2006:
•
the sale on February 2006 of a 6.28% stake in Wind to Weather
for
€328 million
in line with the provisions of the agreements signed by the
parties on May 26, 2005;
•
the acquisition of a 66% interest in SE for
€840 million
(of which we already paid
€168 million
as a deposit in 2005);
•
the acquisition of a 67.5% interest in Electrica Muntenia Sud
for
€820 million.
Closing of this transaction is expected by the end of the third
quarter of 2006; and
•
the distribution, made on June 22, 2006, of an ordinary
dividend equal to
€0.44 per
share, amounting in the aggregate to approximately
€2,715 million;
and an interim dividend on 2006 results that we expect to pay in
November 2006.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We do not engage in the use of special purpose entities for
off-balance sheet financing or any other purpose which results
or may result in material assets or liabilities not being
reflected in our consolidated financial statements. We do use
certain off-balance sheet arrangements with unconsolidated third
parties in the ordinary course of business, including
indemnification agreements, financial guarantees, the sale of
receivables and other arrangements under which we have or may
have continuing obligations. Our arrangements in each of these
categories are described in more detail below.
Indemnities. A number of the agreements governing our
divestiture of former subsidiaries and operations include
indemnification clauses and other guarantees, with the maximum
amount of potential liability under these contracts generally
capped at a percentage of the purchase price. These indemnities
primarily relate to potential liabilities, generally for a
limited period of time, arising from contingent liabilities in
existence at the time of the sale, as well as covering potential
breaches of the representations and warranties provided in the
contracts and, in certain instances, environmental or tax
matters. As of December 31, 2005, our maximum potential
obligations with respect to these indemnities were approximately
€2.2 billion,
increasing from approximately
€1.3 billion
as of December 31, 2004, reflecting indemnities related to
the disposal of Wind (approximately
€750 million)
and Terna (approximately
€200 million).
However, we have not been informed of a claim under any of these
indemnities and believe that the possibility that any such claim
would be made and prove successful is remote.
Financial guarantees. Our off-balance sheet financial
guarantees require us to make contingent payments upon the
occurrence of certain events or changes in an underlying
instrument that is related to an asset, a liability
or the equity of the guaranteed party. These guarantees relate
to arrangements that are direct obligations, giving the party
receiving the guarantee a direct claim against us. At
December 31, 2005, we had granted guarantees totaling
€14 million
(€14 million
at December 31, 2004) comprising guarantees in favor of
Elcogas S.A., an unconsolidated company in which we have an
equity interest.
Derivative instruments. We do not hold or issue
derivative financial instruments for trading purposes. We enter
into derivative contracts to hedge our exposure to foreign
exchange risk, interest rate risk and commodity price risk.
Please see “Item 11. Quantitative and Qualitative
Disclosure About Market Risk — Price Risk Management
and Market Risk Information” for information on those
derivative contracts.
Nuclear liability. We remain liable for damages caused by
a nuclear accident related to certain nuclear assets we owned,
occurred before the transfer of these assets in November 2000.
Please see “Item 4. Information on the
Company — Regulatory Matters — Environmental
Matters — Discontinued Nuclear Operations” and
“Item 4. Information on the Company —
Regulatory Matters — Environmental Matters —
Discontinued Nuclear Operations — Nuclear
Liability” for a discussion of this potential liability and
its maximum amount.
Contractual Obligations and Commitments
Contractual Obligations
The following table sets forth, as of December 31, 2005,
the contractual obligations of the Group with definitive payment
terms which will require significant cash outlays in the future:
Payments Due by Period
Less Than
More Than
Contractual Obligations
Total
1 Year
1-3 Years
3-5 Years
5 Years
(In millions of euro)
Long-term debt (including current maturities)
11,902
935
1,813
1,276
7,878
Capital (Finance) Lease Obligations(*)
—
—
—
—
—
Operating leases
1,728
240
474
468
546
Purchase obligations
55,660
6,898
8,215
7,639
32,908
Other long-term obligations
0
0
Total
69,290
8,073
10,502
9,383
41,332
(*) We do not have capital (finance) lease obligations.
Long-term debt (including current maturities). The
amounts reported above under “Long-term debt (including
current maturities)” relate to our repayment obligations
under outstanding long-term debt including the portion of our
long-term debt with maturities lower than twelve months. For a
more detailed discussion of our long-term debt, please see
“— Liquidity and Capital Resources —
Capital Resources.” We expect that our expenditures related
to these commitments will approximate an aggregate of
€4,024 million
for the period from January 1, 2006 through
December 31, 2010.
Operating leases. The amounts reported above under
“Operating leases” include the minimal rental and
payment commitments due under such leases. We expect that our
expenditures related to these commitments will approximate an
aggregate of
€1,182 million
for the period from January 1, 2006 through
December 31, 2010.
Purchase obligations. The amounts reported above under
“Purchase obligations” primarily include amounts
related to the following purchase obligations:
•
Commitments to suppliers of fuel. We have entered into
various fuel supply contracts, primarily for the purchase of
fuel oil and natural gas, in respect of which we will be
required to pay a total
€51,647 million.
Our aggregate expenditures related to these commitments are
expected to total
€19,066 million
for the period from January 1, 2006 through
December 31, 2010. Please see “Item 4.
Information on the Company — Business — The
Enel Group — Generation and Energy
Management — Fuel” for information about our
purchases of fuel.
Commitments to suppliers of electricity. We also have
unconditional purchase obligations for electric power in respect
of which we will be required to pay a total of
€4,013 million.
Our aggregate expenditures related to these commitments are
expected to total
€3,686 million
for the period from January 1, 2006 through
December 31, 2010.
Commitments
Although the actual amount of our capital expenditures in future
periods will depend on various factors that cannot presently be
foreseen, we expect to make capital expenditures and financial
investments of approximately
€18.6 billion
in the period from 2006 to 2010.
Our planned capital expenditures in the period from 2006 to 2010
include:
•
Approximately
€6,692 million
(€6,813 million
including intangible assets) relating to our Italian generation
businesses;
•
Approximately
€1,300 million
relating to generation development from renewable resources;
•
Approximately
€4,408 million
relating to our international operations;
•
Approximately
€5,859 million
relating to our electricity distribution and sale businesses,
including approximately
€624 million
for our Telemanagement project; and
•
Approximately
€338 million
relating to our gas distribution business.
Please see “Item 4. Information on the
Company — Business — The Enel
Group — Capital Investment Program” for a
discussion of our capital investment program.
Trend Information
Please see “— Overview” and
“— Outlook” for information relating to
recent trends in our production, sales, costs and selling
prices, as well as events that are reasonably likely to have a
material effect on our net sales, operating income,
profitability, liquidity or capital resources, or that would
cause reported financial information not necessarily to be
indicative of future operating results or financial condition.
Please see “— Contractual Obligations and
Commitments” for a discussion of our future capital
expenditures.
ITEM 6.
DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND EMPLOYEES
Directors
Enel’s board of directors is responsible for the management
of the Company’s business and has the power to take all
actions consistent with the corporate purpose described in the
Company’s by-laws. Enel’s board is elected for a term
of up to three years, and members are eligible for re-election.
The board must consist of no fewer than three and no more than
nine members, to which may be added a non-voting director
appointed by the MEF, although no such director has been
appointed.
Enel’s board of directors, elected for a term of three
years at its annual shareholders’ meeting held on
May 26, 2005, consists of nine members. At the May 2005
annual meeting, the shareholders confirmed Mr. Piero Gnudi
as Enel’s Chairman. The board of directors appointed
Mr. Fulvio Conti, who was Enel’s chief financial
officer from 1999 to June 2005, as Enel’s chief executive
officer.
The chairman and chief executive officer are Enel’s legal
representatives. The chief executive officer generally has the
power to represent Enel within the scope of the functions
delegated to him. For specific actions or categories of actions,
the power to represent the Company can be delegated by the
holder of such power to one of Enel’s employees or to third
parties. Please see “Item 10. Additional
Information — By-Laws — Board of
Directors” for additional information on the workings of
Enel’s board of directors.
On July 27, 2005, the board of directors appointed the
members of the Company’s compensation committee and
internal control committee. Both committees were originally
established in January 2000, and subsequently
renewed in June 2002. Until May 2005, they were composed of
three non-executive members. However, since July 2005 both
committees are composed of four non-executive members each. The
members of the compensation committee are Francesco Taranto (as
coordinator), Giulio Ballio, Fernando Napolitano and Gianfranco
Tosi. The members of the internal control committee are Piero
Gnudi (as coordinator), Augusto Fantozzi, Alessandro Luciano and
Francesco Valsecchi. The compensation committee submits to the
board of directors proposals for resolutions concerning the
compensation of the chief executive officer and the other
directors holding specific offices, as well as resolutions
concerning the determination of the compensation criteria for
senior executives, on the basis of the recommendations of the
chief executive officer. The internal control committee has the
authority to evaluate the activity and periodic reports of both
internal and external auditors, and is primarily concerned with
verifying the adequacy of Enel’s internal controls system
and in turn reporting to the full board of directors. This
committee, which Enel established in accordance with the
corporate governance code issued by Borsa Italiana, does not
fulfill the role of the “audit committee” for purposes
of U.S. securities laws and NYSE listing standards. Please
see “Item 10. Additional Information —
Significant Differences in Corporate Governance Practices for
Purposes of Section 303A.11 of the NYSE Listed Company
Manual — Audit Committee and Internal Audit
Function.”
The MEF has confirmed that as long as it remains the
Company’s controlling shareholder, it intends to continue
to participate in the nomination and election of the board of
directors in order to protect its investment as a shareholder.
Under current law, as long as the MEF remains the Company’s
controlling shareholder, the Court of Accounts, which supervises
the financial management of government-owned entities, will
exercise certain powers to protect the financial interests of
the Italian state. For example, the Court of Accounts has the
right to inspect the Company’s financial statements and
regularly reports its findings to the President of the Senate
and the President of the Chamber of Deputies. In addition,
during this period, a non-voting representative of the Court of
Accounts may attend meetings of the Company’s board of
directors and board of statutory auditors.
In this respect, at the annual meeting held on May 26,2005, Enel’s shareholders resolved to decrease the
percentage of directors elected from the candidate list
receiving the majority of votes at the shareholders’
meeting from four-fifths to seven-tenths. Please see
“Item 10. Additional Information —
By-Laws — Minority Shareholders’ Rights.”
The names of the nine members of Enel’s current board of
directors, whose appointment became effective on May 30,2005, as well as their current positions and the year each was
initially appointed as a director are set forth in the following
table.
Year Initially
Name
Position
Appointed
Piero Gnudi
Chairman
2002
Fulvio Conti
Director, general manager (direttore generale), chief
executive officer
2005
Giulio Ballio
Director
2005
Augusto Fantozzi
Director
2005
Alessandro Luciano
Director
2005
Fernando Napolitano
Director
2002
Francesco Taranto
Director
2000
Gianfranco Tosi
Director
2002
Francesco Valsecchi
Director
2005
We have summarized below the principal business activities,
experience and other principal directorships, if any, of each of
the Company’s current directors.
Piero Gnudi. Piero Gnudi gained professional experience
holding numerous positions on the board of directors and the
board of statutory auditors of several major Italian companies,
including STET S.p.A. (now Telecom Italia S.p.A.), Eni (the
holding company of the Italian state-controlled energy group),
Enichem S.p.A. (a subsidiary of Eni), and Credito Italiano
S.p.A., a major Italian bank. He also served as economic advisor
to the Ministry of Productive Activities. In 1994,
Mr. Gnudi was appointed to the board of directors of IRI
S.p.A.,
where he held a number of positions including that of supervisor
of privatizations in 1997, those of chairman of the board of
directors and chief executive officer in 1999, and that of
chairman of the IRI Liquidation Committee from 2000 to 2002. He
is currently chairman of the board of directors of Emittenti
Titoli S.p.A., director of Unicredito Italiano, and receiver of
the Fochi Group, which is under extraordinary administration. He
is also a member of the executive committee of Confindustria
(the organization representing manufacturing and service
industries in Italy), the steering committee of Assonime (an
association of Italian listed companies) and the executive
committee of the Aspen Institute and the Committee for Corporate
Governance sponsored by Borsa Italiana, the Italian stock
exchange. He is also the chairman of the Mediterranean Energy
Observatory (OME). Mr. Gnudi has been the chairman of the
Company’s board of directors since May 2002.
Fulvio Conti. Fulvio Conti held numerous positions in
Mobil Oil Co. in Italy and abroad from 1970 to 1991, and in a
number of Italian companies during the 1990s. He joined
Montedison in 1991, where he served from 1993 to 1996 as head of
the Montedison-Compart group’s Finance department. He
served from 1996 to 1998 as general manager and chief financial
officer of Ferrovie dello Stato S.p.A. (the Italian national
railway company). He held the position of chief financial
officer and general manager of Telecom Italia S.p.A., where he
also held a number of positions in Telecom Italia group
companies in 1998 and 1999. He is a director of Barclays PLC and
Barclays Bank PLC. Mr. Conti joined Enel in 1999, where,
from July 1999 to June 2005, he was Enel’s chief financial
officer. He has been Enel’s chief executive officer and
general manager (direttore generale) since May 2005.
Giulio Ballio. Giulio Ballio has been a professor at the
Milan Polytechnic Institute since 1975, where he has held the
chair of steel constructions at the school of engineering since
1983. He has been the president of the Institute since 2002.
Mr. Ballio is the author of many publications and has
conducted extensive scientific research. In 1970, he founded an
engineering services company (B.C.V. Progetti), where he was
involved in numerous projects as designer, site engineer, and
consultant, both in Italy and abroad. From 1970 to 2000, he was
a member of the National Research Council’s committee on
regulations for steel constructions, and a member of the board
of steel experts from 1975 to 1985, where he served as chairman
in 1981 and 1982. He was also a member of the chairman’s
council of the Italian Calibration Service from 1997 to 2002. He
has been a member of Enel’s board of directors since May
2005.
Augusto Fantozzi. Augusto Fantozzi is a lawyer and the
founding partner of a law firm with offices in Rome, Milan,
Bologna, and Lugano, as well as a professor of tax law at
“La Sapienza” and the LUISS “Guido
Carli.” He served as Minister of Finance from January 1995
to May 1996 in Prime Minister Lamberto Dini’s Cabinet,
where for several months he also held the offices of Minister of
the Budget and Economic Planning and Minister for the
Coordination of E.U. Policies. Mr. Fantozzi was
subsequently the Minister of Foreign Trade in Prime Minister
Romano Prodi’s Cabinet from May 1996 to October 1998. As
member of the Chamber of Deputies in the thirteenth legislature,
from May 1996 to May 2001, he was chairman of the Budget,
Treasury, and Economic Planning Committee beginning in September
1999. He has been vice-president of the Finance Council,
president of the Ascotributi, and a member of the Consulta of
Vatican City. He is a former chairman of the technical committee
of the International Fiscal Association. He has also been on the
board of directors of numerous companies, including companies of
the Benetton Group, Lloyd Adriatico S.p.A., Citinvest S.p.A.,
and has served as a chairman of the board of directors of Banca
Antonveneta S.p.A. since July 2005. He has been a member of
Enel’s board of directors since May 2005.
Alessandro Luciano. Alessandro Luciano began his career
in 1974, practicing currency law and representing leading
Italian and foreign banks. Starting in 1984, he extended his
legal practice to the telecommunications industry where he
became a consultant of STET S.p.A., Techint S.p.A., Snam
Progetti S.p.A., DSC Communications Corporation, Aquater S.p.A.
and Comerint S.p.A. From October 1998 to March 2005, he was a
commissioner of the Italian Communications Authority, where he
was a member of the board and the Infrastructure and Networks
Committee. He is currently the Chairman of Centostazioni S.p.A.,
a company of the Ferrovie dello Stato group, and, since May
2005, a member of Enel’s board of directors.
Fernando Napolitano. Fernando Napolitano began his career
working in the marketing department at Laben S.p.A. (an
aerospace production company in the Finmeccanica Group), and
subsequently worked at Procter & Gamble Italia S.p.A.
In 1990, he joined the Italian office of Booz Allen Hamilton, a
consulting
company in the management and technology sector, where he was
appointed partner and vice-president in 1998. He is currently
responsible for Booz Allen Hamilton’s Italian operations
and actively involved in international projects.
Mr. Napolitano has been a member of the committee for
surface digital television at the Ministry of Communications
since 2001 and director of the European Center for Aerospace
Research since July 2002. He has been a member of the
Company’s board of directors since May 2002.
Francesco Taranto. Francesco Taranto began his career
with a brokerage firm in Milan, and subsequently worked at Banco
di Napoli S.p.A. from 1965 to 1982. He then held numerous
managerial positions in companies operating in the mutual fund
sector, including head of security management at Eurogest S.p.A.
from 1982 to 1984, and general manager of Interbancaria Gestioni
S.p.A. from 1984 to 1987. Having moved to the Prime group where
he worked from 1987 to 2000, he was the chief executive officer
of the group’s holding company for a long time. He is
currently a member of the board of directors of Banca Carige
S.p.A., Cassa di Risparmio di Firenze S.p.A., Pioneer Global
Asset Management S.p.A. (a company of the Unicredito group),
Kedrios S.p.A., a company providing services to financial
companies, and Alto Partners SGR S.p.A. He has also been a
member of both the steering committee of Assogestioni and the
corporate governance committee for listed companies sponsored by
Borsa Italiana. He has been a member of Enel’s board of
directors since October 2000.
Gianfranco Tosi. Gianfranco Tosi has been a professor at
the Polytechnic Institute of Milan since 1982 and at the
University of Lecco since 1992. He has published extensively on
metallurgy, the technology of metals and other related subjects.
He has served as member of the board of directors of several
Italian companies. He has also held several positions in
associations belonging to Confindustria. He was mayor of the
city of Busto Arsizio from 1993 to 2002. He is the chairman of
the Cultural Center for Lombardy, established by the region to
protect and develop the local culture, and is also admitted to
the journalists’ register. He has been a member of
Enel’s board of directors since May 2002.
Francesco Valsecchi. Francesco Valsecchi is a lawyer and
the author of several publications. Since November 2001, he has
been a member of the committee on the reform of Italian civil
procedure instituted by the Minister of Justice, and since March
2002, he has taught at the Civil Service School. Since December
1994, he has been an extraordinary member of the Technical
Council of the Communications Ministry, and since April 2003,
has been on the committee of experts of the High Commission for
the coordination of public finance and the tax system. From July
2002 through April 2003, he was chairman of Postecom, and he is
currently the chairman of BancoPosta Fondi SGR (a company of the
Poste Italiane group). He was also a member of the board of
directors of Poste Italiane S.p.A. (the Italian Post Office
company) from May 2002 until May 2005. He has been a member of
Enel’s board of directors since May 2005.
The table below sets forth our executive officers who are not
also directors, their positions, the year they were appointed to
such positions and their ages as of May 31, 2006:
Year Appointed
Year Joined
to Current
Name
Age
Management Position
the Group
Position
Andrea Brentan
57
Business Development Unit of International Division
Energy Management Unit of Generation and Energy Management
Division
1997
2005
Massimo Romano
46
Institutional and Regulatory Affairs
1997
1999
Paolo Ruzzini
54
Human Resources
2003
2003
Claudio Sartorelli
60
Corporate Affairs
1970
1996
Francesco Starace
50
Head of Market Division
2000
2005
Carlo Tamburi
47
Procurement and Services
2003
2005
We have briefly summarized below the principal business
activities and experience of our executive officers listed above.
Andrea Brentan. Andrea Brentan was a research assistant
at New York University from 1975 to 1977 and then held various
positions at GIE, an Italian power plant contractor operating
worldwide, until the beginning of 1991. From 1991 to 1999, he
successively held the positions of chief financial officer,
general manager and chief executive officer at Sae Sadelmi, a
Milan-based company belonging to the ABB Group which engages in
power plant engineering, procurement and construction and
electrical generation equipment manufacturing and service. From
2000 to 2002, he was the head of the worldwide steam power plant
business at Alstom, based in Paris. He joined Enel in November
2002 as head of International Operations and Business
Development of our Generation and Energy Management Division. He
is currently head of the Business Development Unit of our
International Division.
Alessandro Bufacchi. Alessandro Bufacchi held several
positions in a number of Italian computer companies, including
Ing. Olivetti & C., where he served as Vice-President
Marketing of Enterprise Computer Division from 1992 to 1996,
Wang Global Italia, where he served as head of the New Business
Development department from 1998 to 1999 and Getronics S.p.A.,
where he served as head of the Enterprise Systems Division in
1999. He joined the Enel Group in 2000. He has been head of
Enel’s e-business
development department since May 2000, head of operations of
Enel.it since April 2003 as well as of the Business &
Telecommunications development department since April 2004. He
is currently head of Enel’s Information and Communication
Technology department.
Antonio Cardani. Antonio Cardani served as head of the
administration department of Olivetti S.p.A. from 1984 to 1995.
He served as head of the Administration and Finance department
of Telemedia S.p.A. from 1995 to
1997. He joined Telecom Italia S.p.A. in 1997, where he was
responsible for strategic planning from 1997 to 1998 and for
planning and organizational development from 1998 to 2000. He
has been head of Enel’s Audit department since 2000.
Salvatore Cardillo. Salvatore Cardillo has served as the
general counsel of a number of major Italian companies,
including Aeritalia-Finmeccanica from 1983 to 1991, Alitalia
S.p.A. from 1991 to 1997, Edison, a subsidiary of Compart Group
Montedison from 1997 to 1999 and De Agostini S.p.A., a major
Italian publishing company, from 1999 to 2000. He joined Enel in
2000 as general counsel, the position he currently holds.
Gianluca Comin. Gianluca Comin served as head of the
public relations department and communications department at
Montedison S.p.A. from 1999 to 2001. He also served as head of
the press relations department at Telecom Italia S.p.A. from
September 2001 to June 2002. He worked as a journalist at
“Il Gazzettino,” an Italian newspaper, from 1987 to
1999. He is also a member of the board of directors of Syremont
S.p.A., a company in the Montedison Group. In July 2002, he
joined Enel as head of the Communication department, the
position he currently holds.
Luigi Ferraris.Luigi Ferraris has held several positions
in accounting and control with a number of Italian and foreign
companies including Elsag Bailey Process Automation, a company
of the Finmeccanica group, and a leader in process control,
where he served as Area Controller for Europe until 1999. In
1999 he joined Enel as chief financial officer of Eurogen,
Elettrogen, and Interpower (our former Gencos). In 2001, he was
appointed chief financial officer of the Sales, Infrastructure
and Networks Division. Since June 2005 he has held the position
of executive vice president of the Accounting, Planning and
Control Department and serves as Enel’s chief financial
officer with respect to such functions. He is currently a member
of the board of directors of Enel’s main subsidiaries and
sole director of the Enel shared services company (Enel Servizi
S.r.l.). He is also a member of the board of directors of
Weather Investment and Wind.
Sandro Fontecedro. Sandro Fontecedro joined Enel in 1970
in the engineering department. In 1979, he became head of
maintenance services for thermal generation until 1985, when he
became manager of the Torrevaldaliga Nord thermal power plant.
In 1991, he became manager of a group of power plants until
1997, when he assumed responsibility for a regional unit
comprising several plants. He served as head of thermal and
renewable generation from 2000 to 2003, when he was appointed
head of the Generation and Energy Management Division.
Livio Gallo. Livio Gallo has held several positions in a
number of companies in Europe. Before 1999, he served as area
vice president for West Europe and Africa area of Elsag Bailey
Process Automation, a company of the Finmeccanica group. He
joined Enel in 1999, where he served as executive vice president
of the sales area of Enel’s Gencos until 2001. From 2002 to
2004, he held the position of executive vice president of the
Regulated Sales Area of Enel Distribuzione, and from 2004 to
2005 he served as executive vice president of the Business Area
Electric Network of Enel Distribuzione. He currently holds the
position of head of the Infrastructure and Network Division and
of chief executive officer of Enel Distribuzione.
Claudio Machetti.Claudio Machetti served as manager in
the central finance department of Banca di Roma in 1990. In 1992
he served as manager in the capital markets unit at Ferrovie
dello Stato, the national railway company, and, from 1997 to
2000, he held the position of head of finance and chief
executive officer of Fercredit. He served also as member of the
board of directors in several finance and insurance companies.
He joined Enel in 2000, holding the position of head of the
Finance department. Since June 2005 he has held the position of
executive vice president for the Finance Department and serves
as Enel’s chief financial officer with respect to such
function. Moreover, he currently holds the position of chairman
of Enelfactor and Enel.re, director of Enel Finance
International, Enel Ireland Finance, Enel Green Power
International, Enel Capital, Enel Trade, Wind and Weather
Investments. He also serves as chairman of Fondenel and
vice-chairman of Fopen.
Gianfilippo Mancini. Gianfilippo Mancini served as audit
manager and then as head of the asset management department of
the Olivetti Group from 1992 to 1997. He joined Enel in 1997,
where he served as chief financial officer of Enelpower and then
as head of the Group Planning and Control Department. From 2003
to 2005, he was head of the Fuel Business Department, and is
currently responsible for the energy management activities of
the Generation and Energy Management Division.
Massimo Romano. Massimo Romano served as head of the
Public Affairs department of the Ilva Group from 1990 to 1994
and as head of the External Relations department of the Lucchini
Group from 1994 to 1997. He joined Enel in 1997, as head of the
public affairs department. In 1999, he became head of
Enel’s Institutional and Regulatory Affairs department,
which is the position he still holds. He is also member of the
board of directors of Terna, of the Directive Council of
Assoelettrica (an association of Italian companies operating in
the electric sector) and of the Executive Board of
Confindustria, as well as of the board of the Energy and
Environmental Political and Economical Institute at the Luigi
Bocconi University. He is also the senior advisor to the task
force set by the Foreign Affairs Ministry for the
internationalization of the Italian production system.
Paolo Ruzzini. From 1992 to 1995, Paolo Ruzzini was head
of human resources for the Olivetti Group. In 1996, he became
director of the Solutions Division first at Olivetti Sistemi e
Servizi and then at Olivetti Solutions (Olsy). In 1998, with the
acquisition of Olsy by Wang Laboratories, he became director of
the Solutions Integration Olivetti Wang Global business line.
Before joining Enel in July 2003 as director of Human Resources
for the Group, he was chief executive officer of Getronics
Italia S.p.A.
Claudio Sartorelli. Claudio Sartorelli joined Enel in
1970. Since then he has held a number of positions. He was
general counsel from 1996 to 2000. He has been head of
Enel’s Corporate Affairs department since 1996 and he
currently serves as secretary of Enel’s board of directors.
Francesco Starace. Francesco Starace held a number of
management positions in Italy, the US, Saudi Arabia, Egypt,
and the UAE in the contracting and engineering department of
General Electric Company from 1982 to 1987, and subsequently of
ABB Alstom Powers Corporation from 1987 to 2000. When he left
ABB Alstom Powers Corporation, he was responsible for the global
sales and turn key plants for the gas turbine division. He
joined Enel in 2000 as head of Energy Management of Enel
Produzione and has been the head of the Market Division since
November 2005.
Carlo Tamburi. Carlo Tamburi held a number of positions
over 20 years in Citibank N.A., I.R.I. (Istituto per la
Ricostruzione Industriale), and the Italian Ministry of
Economy and Finance. He has also been the chairman of Tirrenia
di Navigazione S.p.A., as well as a member of the board of
directors of several Italian companies such as Finmeccanica and
Alitalia. He joined Enel in 2003 and is currently the head of
the Procurement and Services Department. He is also chief
executive officer of Dalmazia Trieste, the real estate company
of the Enel Group, and vice chairman of Weather Investments and
Wind.
Board of Statutory Auditors
Pursuant to the Italian civil code, in addition to electing the
board of directors, Enel’s shareholders also elect a board
of statutory auditors.
Statutory auditors remain in office for a three-year term and
may be re-elected for consecutive terms or substituted
automatically by an alternate auditor if they resign or are
unable to complete their term. Statutory auditors may be removed
only for cause and with the approval of an Italian court.
The board of statutory auditors is responsible for reviewing
Enel’s management, financial reporting and financial
condition. In conducting this review, the board of statutory
auditors has a duty to the shareholders, to whom it reports, and
to Enel. The role of the board of statutory auditors includes
reviewing the Company’s management, and, in particular,
ensuring compliance with applicable law and the Company’s
by-laws. Furthermore, the statutory auditors must ensure that
Enel maintains adequate organizational structure, internal
controls and administrative and accounting systems.
Enel’s current board of statutory auditors was appointed in
May 2004. The chairman of the board of statutory auditors,
Eugenio Pinto, was appointed in May 2005, after the resignation
of Angelo Provasoli. The term of its members will expire on the
date of the annual shareholders’ meeting approving the
financial statements as of December 31, 2006. The names of
the current members, their positions and the year during which
each was initially appointed are set forth in the following
table.
Year Initially
Name
Position
Appointed
Eugenio Pinto
Chairman
2005
Carlo Conte
Auditor
2004
Franco Fontana
Auditor
2001
Giancarlo Giordano
Alternate Auditor
2004
Paolo Sbordoni
Alternate Auditor
2004
In addition, under Italian securities regulations, the
Company’s accounts must be audited by external auditors
appointed by the shareholders. The appointment is communicated
to the CONSOB. As of the fiscal year 2005, the Company’s
external auditors for both consolidated and non-consolidated
accounts are KPMG S.p.A. At the annual meeting held on
May 26, 2005, Enel’s shareholders reappointed KPMG
S.p.A. as Enel’s external auditors for a three-year term
(according to the provisions of law then in force) expiring on
the date of the annual shareholders’ meeting approving the
financial statements as of December 31, 2007. Under Italian
securities laws, as recently amended, listed companies may not
appoint the same auditors for more than two consecutive six-year
terms. Please see “Item 10. Additional
Information — By-Laws — External
Auditors.”
The external auditors issue an opinion that the Company’s
financial statements are presented fairly in all material
respects. Their opinion is made available to the Company’s
shareholders prior to the annual shareholders meeting.
Executive Compensation
Applicable Italian regulations (Article 78 of CONSOB
Regulation No. 11971, issued on May 14, 1999, as
amended (“Regulation No. 11971”)) require
Enel to disclose in the Company’s financial statements the
following information regarding the compensation for 2005 of
each of the directors and statutory auditors who served in such
year. The following amounts include compensation paid to such
persons by Enel’s subsidiaries. The current members of
Enel’s board of directors, as well as the chairman of the
board of statutory auditors, were appointed on May 26, 2005
at the annual meeting of Enel’s shareholders. Enel’s
shareholders also set the directors’ individual base
compensation in an amount equal to
€85,000 per
year; while the board of directors set
the additional compensation of the chairman of the board of
directors and the chief executive officer, after having received
the opinion of the board of statutory auditors in accordance
with the Company’s by-laws.
Base
Bonuses and
Non-Monetary
Other
Name
Positions(s) Held
Compensation
Other Incentives
Benefits
Compensation
(In euros)
Current and former directors
Piero Gnudi
Chairman
700,755.14
585,998.30
(1)
11,050.68
(2)
2,640,000.00
(3)
Paolo Scaroni
Chief executive officer, general manager, director(6)
294,507.19
3,187,024.91
(4)
5,997,675.71
(5)
Fulvio Conti
Chief executive officer, general manager, director
350,000.00
350,000.00
(7)
982,959.61
(8)
Mauro Miccio
Director(6)
47,404.21
Franco Morganti
Director(6)
46,630.90
28,506.84
(9)
Giulio Ballio
Director
63,583.10
Augusto Fantozzi
Director
62,833.10
Alessandro Luciano
Director
62,833.10
Fernando Napolitano
Director
110,479.99
Francesco Taranto
Director
117,029.40
18,273.97
(10)
Gianfranco Tosi
Director
109,963.53
Francesco Valsecchi
Director
62,883.10
Total compensation of Directors
2,028,852.76
4,123,023.21
11,050.68
9,667,416.13
Current and former statutory auditors
Angelo Provasoli
Chairman(11)
35,860.80
Eugenio Pinto
Chairman
49,416.80
Franco Fontana
Statutory Auditor
74,500.00
Carlo Conte
Statutory Auditor
75,000.00
(12)
Total compensation of Statutory Auditors
234,777.60
Total compensation paid
2,263,630.36
4,123,023.21
11,050.68
9,667,416.13
For all positions held at Group companies other than Enel, the
compensation of Piero Gnudi, Paolo Scaroni and Fulvio Conti has
either been renounced by them or paid to Enel and included in
their base compensation.
(1)
This amount is composed of:
(i) €186,000.00
as a variable part of the base compensation relating to fiscal
year 2004, resolved upon and paid in 2005;
(ii) €199,998.30
as a variable part of the base compensation relating to fiscal
year 2005, resolved upon and paid in 2005; and
(iii) €200,000.00
as bonus for the sale of Wind to Weather.
(2)
Insurance policies.
(3)
This compensation was determined on the basis of a “phantom
stock option plan” granted by the board of directors to
Piero Gnudi for his role of chairman of the board of directors
from 2002 through 2005. Under this “phantom stock option
plan” the beneficiary was awarded the right to receive a
compensation, subject to ordinary taxation, equal to the
difference between the market value of Enel’s shares at the
time of the exercise of the “phantom stock options”
assigned and the exercise price of the same options determined
at the time of the grant, such amount being multiplied by the
number of the “phantom stock options” assigned. In
“phantom stock option plans”, unlike conventional
stock option plans, neither actual stock options are granted nor
shares are issued.
This amount is composed of:
(i) €700,000.00
as a variable part of the compensation relating to fiscal year
2004, resolved upon and paid in 2005, (ii)
€291,666.66 as a
variable part of the compensation relating to fiscal year 2005,
resolved upon and paid in 2005,
(iii) €1,695,358.25
as a bonus entry compensation and
(iv) €500,000.00
as bonus for the sale of Wind to Weather.
(5)
This amount is composed of:
(i) €312,410.07
as base compensation for services rendered as general manager in
2005, and
(ii) €600,000.00
as a variable part of the same compensation relating to fiscal
year 2004, resolved upon and paid in 2005,
(iii) €250,000.00
as a variable part of the same compensation relating to fiscal
year 2005, resolved upon and paid in 2005,
(iv) €322,291.64
for severance indemnity,
(v) €1,872,000.00
as compensation determined on the basis of a “phantom stock
option plan” and subject to ordinary taxation. For a
description of Enel’s “phantom stock option
plans” please see note (3) above;
(vi) €2,640,974.00
for a bonus connected to the exercise of stock options granted
in his capacity of general manager. This bonus is paid to all
managers when they exercise the options granted; its amount is
proportionate to the number of options exercised and is
connected to dividends distributed by Enel for assets divestment.
(6)
Former member of Enel’s board of directors.
(7)
Variable part of the base compensation relating to fiscal year
2005, resolved upon and paid in 2005.
(8)
This amount is composed of:
(i) €431,980.74
as base compensation for services rendered as general manager in
2005,
(ii) €408,333.31
as a variable part of the same compensation relating to fiscal
year 2005 and paid in 2005
(iii) €142,645.56
as bonus connected to the exercise of stock options following
May 30, 2005 (date of his appointment as chief executive
officer and general manager) granted to Mr. Conti for his
position as head of Enel’s Finance, Administration and
Control department vested until June 20, 2005. This bonus
is paid to all managers when they exercise the options granted;
its amount is proportionate to the number of options exercised
and is connected to dividends distributed by Enel for assets
divestment.
(9)
Compensation paid for services rendered to Wind, as director
until August 11, 2005 (for the amount of
€18,273.97) and
for certain non-managerial tasks delegated to him by the board
of directors in his capacity as director (for the amount of
€10,232.87).
Mr. Morganti ceased to perform these tasks, effective as of
March 24, 2005.
(10)
Compensation paid as a director of Wind until August 11,2005.
Compensation paid to the MEF (for the amount of
€55,000.00)
pursuant to the directive of Council of Ministers —
Public Office department (Dipartimento della Funzione Pubblica)
of March 1, 2000.
There are no service contracts entered into by Enel’s
directors with Enel or any of its subsidiaries providing for
benefits upon termination of employment.
We do not disclose to the Company’s shareholders or
otherwise make available public information as to the individual
compensation of the Company’s executive officers, who are
not directors.
The aggregate compensation Enel and its subsidiaries paid to all
of Enel’s directors, senior managers and statutory auditors
identified in this annual report, excluding pension, retirement
or similar benefits, for the year ended December 31, 2005,
was approximately
€24.7 million.
The aggregate amount paid or accrued for pension, retirement or
similar benefits for the same directors, statutory auditors and
executive officers for the year ended December 31, 2005,
was approximately
€2.7 million.
In addition, Enel’s current chief executive officer
Mr. Conti, in his capacity as chief financial officer, was
granted:
•
In April 2001, 621,280 options to purchase the same number of
Enel’s ordinary shares, under the 2001 stock option plan.
Of these options, 56% vested and, consequently, 347,916 options
were exercisable starting in 2004. These options expired on
December 31, 2005. The exercise price for these options was
€7.272. During
the period between June 1, 2005, and June 16, 2005,
Mr. Conti exercised all of the vested options and sold
332,916 of the resulting shares on the market;
In March 2002, a further 902,500 options to purchase the same
number of Enel’s ordinary shares, under the 2002 stock
option plan. All these options vested and, consequently, 30% of
the options were exercisable starting in 2003, an additional 30%
starting in 2004 and the remaining 40% starting in 2005. These
options expire on December 31, 2007. The exercise price for
these options is
€6.426. During
the period between May 24, 2004, and June 11, 2004,
Mr. Conti exercised 250,000 of these options and sold the
resulting shares on the market. Subsequently, during the period
between November 12, 2004, and December 2, 2004,
Mr. Conti exercised a further 175,000 of these options, and
between February 3, 2005, and February 23, 2005, a
further 141,500 of these options and sold all of the resulting
shares on the market. As of May 31, 2006, Mr. Conti
has not exercised any of the remaining 336,000 options;
•
In April 2003, a further 992,800 options to purchase the same
number of Enel’s ordinary shares, under the 2003 stock
option plan. All these options vested and, consequently, 30% of
the options are exercisable starting from 2004, an additional
30% starting from 2005 and the remaining 40% starting from 2006.
These options expire on December 31, 2008. The exercise
price for these options is
€5.240. During
the period between May 24, 2004, and June 11, 2004,
Mr. Conti exercised 297,840 of these options and sold the
resulting shares on the market. Subsequently, during the period
between February 3, 2005, and February 23, 2005,
Mr. Conti exercised a further 200,000 of these options and
sold the resulting shares on the market. As of May 31,2006, Mr.Conti has not exercised any of the remaining 494,960
options;
•
In March 2004, a further 600,000 options to purchase the same
number of Enel’s ordinary shares, under the 2004 stock
option plan. All these options vested and, consequently, 15% of
the options may be exercised starting from 2005, another 15%
starting from 2006, an additional 30% starting from 2007 and the
remaining 40% starting from 2008. These options expire on
December 31, 2009. The exercise price for these options is
€6.242. As of
May 31, 2006, Mr. Conti has not exercised any of these
options; and
•
In March 2005, a further 600,000 options to purchase the same
number of Enel’s ordinary shares, under the 2005 stock
option plan. Given that the conditions precedent provided for in
the 2005 stock option plan were not satisfied, none of these
options vested and all automatically lapsed.
On April 12, 2006, the board of directors approved a
proposal for a new stock option plan that provides for the
assignment to the chief executive officer, in his capacity as
general manager, of 1,500,000 options to subscribe to the same
number of Enel’s newly issued ordinary shares. On
May 26, 2006 the annual shareholders’ meeting approved
this proposal and authorized the board of directors to implement
this stock option plan. Please see “Item 10.
Additional Information — Stock Option Plans” for
a complete description of the Company’s stock option plans.
Share Ownership
The following table sets forth the number of Enel’s
ordinary shares held by each of the Company’s directors and
statutory auditors as of May 31, 2006:
All of these shares are held by Mr. Ballio’s wife.
Employees
As of December 31, 2005, we had 51,778 employees, of whom
562 held managerial positions. The following table shows the
breakdown of employees in each of our principal segments at
December 31, 2005.
Number of
Employees
Division
Generation and Energy Management
9,904
19
%
Sales, Infrastructure and Networks
35,783
69
%
Services and Other Activities
5,522
11
%
Holding Company
569
1
%
Discontinued Operations
0
0
%
Total Enel Group
51,778
100
%
In recent years, we have pursued a policy of workforce
rationalization, primarily through attrition, which has resulted
in a steady reduction in employment levels: the number of our
employees has declined by 41.7%, from 88,957 at
December 31, 1997, to 51,778 employees at December 31,2005.
Based on the current retirement system available to our
employees, the Company’s management estimates that the
following number of employees will retire during each of the
periods shown:
Estimated Number of
Potential Retirees
2006
1,700
2007
1,700
2008
1,000
2009
1,200
2010
800
If Italy’s current system of governmental retirement
benefits changes significantly, we will consider adopting other
voluntary measures to reduce employment levels. These measures
may involve increased costs. The increased use of automated,
remote-controlled plants and of advanced information technology
and other rationalization measures has improved our ability to
conduct operations with fewer employees.
The table below shows our employment levels for each of the
years indicated.
Most of our non-management employees in the electricity sector
in Italy are members of labor unions. The principal labor unions
are the National Federation of Energy Workers, to which
approximately 32% of our employees belong, the Italian
Electrical Companies Federation, to which approximately 31% of
our employees belong, and the Italian Union of Chemical,
Electrical and Manufacturing Workers, to which approximately 9%
of our employees belong. Other employees are members of smaller
labor unions, none of which represents more than 2% of our
employees. Typically, we negotiate with representatives of the
three unions covering the largest number of our employees, and
enter into a single collective bargaining agreement every four
years. Representatives of the smaller unions typically sign the
same agreement at a later date. Under the collective bargaining
agreement, wages and other compensation arrangements are
negotiated every two years.
In July 2001, we signed a collective bargaining agreement for
employees in the electricity industry with the unions, the GRTN
and So.g.i.n. This collective bargaining agreement for all
electric employees also applies to independent power producers
and to municipally owned electric utilities. This contract
expired as to both the economic and other terms at the end of
June 2005. In October 2005, labor unions for the electricity
market formally requested the renewal of the collective
bargaining agreement. Negotiations about such renewal and the
text of the agreement are still being conducted.
We also take part in negotiations for the renewal of the
collective bargaining agreement for the gas and water sectors,
which expired in 2005 as to both the economic and other terms;
such agreement concerns approximately 1,800 of our employees.
Under the terms of the collective bargaining agreements
currently in effect, we may terminate covered employees only
when they reach retirement age or for cause. We believe that we
can achieve our workforce rationalization objectives principally
through attrition.
We believe that our relations with the unions are generally
satisfactory. Our employees have the right under Italian law to
strike, although the unions have guaranteed that in such event a
minimum level of service will be provided in each of the
generation, transmission and distribution segments. We are party
to a national agreement with the principal labor unions that
regulates the exercise of our employees’ right to strike.
As a consequence, strikes or other work stoppages have not
significantly affected our operations in recent years. In 2004,
as part of a national initiative to bring the agreement in line
with legislative and regulatory developments that have occurred
since the contract was first signed in 1991, employers and the
trade unions proposed modifications to the terms of this
contract, including a proposal by the unions to reduce the level
of certain service guarantees. Negotiations on a new regulatory
framework continued in 2005 and are still in progress.
Employee compensation is based in part on seniority and the
position held by each employee. In addition, our employees are
covered by a collective agreement with the main Italian unions
on bonuses, which was renewed in 2005. This agreement provides
for employee bonuses based on our general profitability, and is
paid out to middle management and employees, as well as for
bonuses tied to productivity and quality targets set for
individual divisions within the Group.
For our senior and middle management, a significant portion of
the compensation is based on performance, largely through a
“management by objective” system with certain
correction mechanisms to ensure that compensation does not
significantly depart from market levels. This compensation
method applied to approximately 82% of our management in 2005.
For top managers, the variable component of compensation
accounts for approximately 35% of total compensation.
Salary incentives based on sales have also been introduced for
sale employees and key account managers.
Following our entry in Confindustria, the Italian association of
industrial companies, in 2004, we became party to a national
labor contract with unions representing managers of
manufacturing and service companies. We do not expect this
contract to have any material effect on our relationship with
our managers.
ITEM 7.
MAJOR SHAREHOLDERS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Major Shareholders
Prior to Enel’s initial public offering in November 1999,
the MEF had been Enel’s sole shareholder since Enel’s
incorporation in July 1992. Before that date, Enel had been a
public statutory body owned by the Italian government.
Enel’s initial public offering consisted of a total of
3,848,802,000 ordinary shares (then 31.74% of the Company’s
share capital and corresponding to 1,924,401,000 ordinary shares
after the one-for-two reverse stock split effective July 9,2001) in the form of ordinary shares and ADSs (each representing
ten ordinary shares at the time of the offering, and five
ordinary shares after the one-for-two reverse stock split). The
offering of the Company’s shares was the second largest in
history at the time and generated gross proceeds of
approximately
€16,550 million.
On November 4, 2003, the MEF announced its sale of
400,000,000 of Enel’s ordinary shares (then 6.6% of the
Company’s share capital) to Morgan Stanley & Co.
International Limited for
€2,172.8 million.
The MEF also announced that Morgan Stanley & Co.
International Limited had informed the MEF that it had placed
the entire amount of shares purchased with Italian and
international investors.
On December 12, 2003, the MEF sold 627,528,282 of
Enel’s ordinary shares (then 10.35% of the Company’s
share capital) to Cassa Depositi e Prestiti, then a wholly owned
subsidiary of the MEF, for total consideration of approximately
€3,156 million.
On December 30, 2003, the MEF announced the placement of
shares representing 30% of the share capital of Cassa Depositi e
Prestiti to 65 Italian bank foundations. As a result, the MEF
now owns 70% of Cassa Depositi e Prestiti.
On October 25, 2004, the MEF announced that it had sold
1,150,000,000 of Enel’s ordinary shares (then 18.86% of the
Company’s share capital), in a public offering in Italy and
a private placement to institutional investors not registered
under Securities Act, for a total consideration of approximately
€7,636 million.
On July 4, 2005, the MEF announced that it had sold another
575,000,000 of Enel’s ordinary shares (then 9.35% of the
Company’s share capital), in a public offering in Italy and
a private placement to institutional investors not registered
under Securities Act, for a total consideration of approximately
€4,101 million.
As of May 26, 2006, the MEF owned 1,317,462,452 of
Enel’s ordinary shares, or 21.36% of the outstanding
ordinary shares, and Cassa Depositi e Prestiti owned 627,528,282
of Enel’s ordinary shares, or 10.18% of the outstanding
ordinary shares. As of that date, no other entity or individual
held 2% or more of the Company’s outstanding ordinary
shares.
The MEF or Cassa Depositi e Prestiti may sell part of
Enel’s shares at any time. There are no minimum ownership
or similar requirements under Italian law that would limit sales
of Enel’s shares by the MEF or Cassa Depositi e Prestiti.
Within the context of the privatization procedures and
regulations under Italian law, the MEF may, as a significant
shareholder, ask Enel’s board of directors to examine the
possibility of dispositions, in whole or in part, of some
entities we control. Enel’s board would implement any such
transaction solely to enhance value for all shareholders.
The MEF has indicated that it intends to continue to participate
in the nomination and election of Enel’s board of directors
to protect its investment as a shareholder. Under the 1994
privatization law, as amended by article 4,
paragraph 227, of Law 350 of December 24, 2003 (the
2004 Budget Law), the MEF has special powers, regardless of the
level of its shareholding in Enel, related to:
•
The material acquisition of Enel’s shares by third parties;
•
Material shareholders’ agreements;
•
Major corporate changes; and
•
The appointment of one non-voting director.
In addition, the privatization law provides that Enel’s
by-laws may include:
•
Special rules concerning appointments of directors and statutory
auditors in order to ensure that minority shareholders are
represented; and
•
Limitations on the maximum number of shares that a shareholder,
or group of shareholders, other than the MEF (or other entities
controlled by the Italian state), may hold.
Certain provisions of Enel’s by-laws, as well as the
special powers the MEF retains, are described in more detail in
“Item 10. Additional Information —
By-Laws.”
As of May 24, 2006, 6,167,056,262 ordinary shares were
outstanding. As of the same date, there were 7,898,860 ADSs
(equivalent to 39,494,300 ordinary shares) held by 31 registered
holders (including The Depository Trust Company).
Since certain of the ordinary shares and ADSs are held by
brokers or other nominees, the number of direct record holders
in the United States may not be fully indicative of the number
of direct beneficial owners in the United States or of where the
direct beneficial owners of such shares are resident.
Related Party Transactions
As the entity primarily responsible for electricity generation,
distribution and transport in Italy, we provide services to a
number of other state-owned entities. The rates charged to these
entities are comparable to those charged to other commercial
organizations.
Under the current regulatory framework, we enter into certain
transactions with the GRTN, the Single Buyer and the Market
Operator (each of which is wholly owned, directly or indirectly,
by the MEF, the Company’s controlling shareholder) and with
Terna (which is indirectly controlled by the MEF through its
subsidiary Cassa Depositi e Prestiti). Certain of the prices and
fees paid to the Market Operator are determined by the Energy
Authority. Transactions entered into with the Market Operator on
the Italian power exchange and with the Single Buyer are
conducted at market prices.
Our Sales, Infrastructure and Networks Division (which has been
split into our Market Division and Infrastructure and Networks
Division) purchased electricity from the Single Buyer and the
GRTN. Our Generation and Energy Management Division purchased
and sold electricity from and to the Market Operator on the
Italian power exchange and sold electricity to the Single Buyer.
Revenues generated from transactions with the GRTN in 2005
represented approximately 5% of our total operating revenues for
the year. Revenues generated from sales to the Market Operator
and the Single Buyer during the year represented approximately
19% and 3% of our total operating revenues, respectively.
Expenses generated from transactions with the Single Buyer
represented approximately 36% of our total operating expenses in
2005, while expenses generated from transactions with the GRTN
and the Market Operator represented approximately 5% and 4% of
our total operating expenses, respectively.
Since the deconsolidation of Terna as of September 15,2005, we no longer earn revenues from a fee per kWh of
electricity transported that distributors and suppliers paid to
Terna through the GRTN. For more details on the deconsolidation
of Terna, please see “Item 4. Information on the
Company — Business — The Enel
Group — Discontinued Operations”. Instead, we pay
fees to Terna for the transport of electricity, which are
determined by the Energy Authority. Both our Sales,
Infrastructure and Networks Division and our Generation and
Energy Management Division paid fees to Terna for the use of the
national electricity transmission grid. Revenues generated from
transactions with Terna after its deconsolidation until
December 31, 2005 represented approximately 1% of our total
operating revenues for the year. Expenses generated from
transactions with Terna after its deconsolidation until
December 31, 2005 represented approximately 1% of our total
operating expenses.
We purchase fuel for our generation plants and our gas
distribution and sales activities from Eni, an Italian oil and
gas company controlled by the MEF. Total purchases from Eni
represented approximately 7% of our total operating expenses in
2005.
With reference to transactions with associated companies, we
incurred expenses with respect to telecommunications services
(Wind), rent and lease payments (Leasys and IFB) and
research activities (Cesi). All transactions with associated
parties are concluded on an arm length basis.
You should read note 16 to our consolidated financial
statements for additional information on these transactions.
We make loans available to our employees, excluding executive
officers, up to an amount of
€25,822 per
employee.
We have adopted corporate governance guidelines aimed at
ensuring that potential transactions with related parties are
carried out in a procedurally and substantively fair manner.
Please see “Item 18. Financial Statements” of
this annual report.
Other Financial Information
Legal Proceedings
We are defendants in a number of legal proceedings incidental to
the generation and distribution of electricity. While we do not
expect these proceedings, either individually or in the
aggregate, to have a material adverse effect on our financial
position or results of operations, because of the nature of
these proceedings, we are not able to predict their ultimate
outcomes, some of which may be unfavorable to us. Please see
“Item 3. Key Information — Risk
Factors — Other Risks Related to Our
Businesses — We are defendants in a number of legal
proceedings.”
Our pending legal proceedings include various civil and
environmental claims and disputes relating to the construction
and operation of several power stations, transmission and
distribution lines, tax assessments, and other matters that
arise in the normal course of our business. We have established
a reserve for litigation and other contingent liabilities where
we consider it probable that a claim will be resolved
unfavorably and where we can reasonably estimate the potential
loss involved. This reserve, which also includes provisions for
other contingencies and uncertainties related to our operations,
is included in other non-current liabilities in the consolidated
balance sheets in our consolidated financial statements, and
amounted to
€1,146 million
at December 31, 2005, of which
€341 million
related to legal proceedings.
We have briefly summarized below the most significant of these
proceedings.
Electromagnetic field proceedings
We are currently defendants in numerous pending proceedings
relating to the electromagnetic fields created by our
transmission and distribution lines and in some pending
proceedings relating to electromagnetic energy emanating from
substations. In most of the proceedings, the plaintiffs seek the
relocation or removal of lines or substations that are near to
inhabited or occupied residential or office buildings. In a
limited number of proceedings, the plaintiffs also seek damages
based on our alleged non-compliance with regulations setting
maximum exposure levels or minimum distance requirements for
lines and substations or on the alleged health effects of
exposure to electromagnetic fields.
In the cases described above, the transmission and distribution
lines in question are in compliance with all applicable laws.
Moreover, we believe that certain of such proceedings have
become moot as a result of a law enacted in March 2001, which
replaced previous legislation on electromagnetic fields and
introduced measures for the restructuring of the national
electricity transmission grid. In any event, if the outcome of
the above civil cases is unfavorable to us, our potential
liability would be limited mainly to damages, to the extent
plaintiffs have satisfied their burden of proof by demonstrating
a causal connection between electromagnetic fields and the
alleged damage. Please see “Item 4. Information on the
Company — Regulatory Matters — Environmental
Matters — Electromagnetic Fields” for a more
detailed discussion of electromagnetic fields.
Blackout litigation
Italy, with the exception of Sardinia, suffered a complete
blackout of electrical service on September 28, 2003.
Approximately 21 hours were necessary before electricity
became available again to all customers. A joint report on the
blackout by the Energy Authority and the French Commission de
Régulation de l’Energie, dated April 22, 2004,
includes among the causes of the blackout inappropriate defense
measures taken by the Swiss transmission grids, the
non-compliance by certain Swiss electricity companies with the
rules provided by the Union for the Co-ordination of
Transmission of Electricity (UCTE) and inappropriate
measures taken to cure certain malfunctions. Other inquiries by
Swiss, French and Italian authorities are still underway.
As of May 2006, approximately 1,900,000, mainly household,
customers have requested reimbursement of approximately
€25 each, in
accordance with pre-existing Energy Authority rules, despite the
fact that in October 2003, the Energy Authority had issued a
release in which it declared that customers are not entitled to
such reimbursement in connection with the blackout. We believe
that we were not responsible for the blackout and, accordingly,
have not honored any of these requests. In addition, as of May
2006, approximately 70,000 of our customers have brought legal
actions against Enel Distribuzione and Enel in the Italian
courts seeking aggregate damages of approximately
€70 million.
So far, the courts have issued more than 7,000 decisions, most
of which have been unfavorable to us.
Although the claims of each of the individual plaintiffs are for
relatively minor amounts, an increase in the decisions holding
us responsible for such damages could result in an increase in
the number of such claims and the magnitude of damages sought.
Italian law does not provide for the award of punitive damages
in such cases, and plaintiffs will be limited to compensatory
damages.
Enel Distribuzione and Enel have appealed all unfavorable
decisions before the competent courts, that in some cases
overturned the appealed decisions on the grounds that the
plaintiffs had not proven any damages and, in one case, excluded
the defendants of any responsibility for the blackout. So far,
no unfavorable decision has been confirmed.
On June 9, 2004, the Energy Authority published a
preliminary report that, while not making any definitive finding
regarding responsibility, raised the possibility that the
blackout may have been partially attributable to the conduct of
a number of Italian generation, distribution and transmission
companies, including members of the Enel Group. On
September 9, 2004, the Energy Authority initiated a formal
proceeding to determine whether any of the companies identified
in the report (including Enel Produzione, Enel Distribuzione,
Terna and Deval) were actually responsible. In June 2005, the
Energy Authority notified Enel Produzione of the results of the
preliminary investigations that could have led to a relevant
fine. In light of such results and in order to gain certainty
and limit possible negative effects, despite having denied any
responsibility with respect to the blackout, on August 8,2005, Enel Produzione decided to pay a fine of
€52,000 to settle
the potential claim against it, as permitted by Italian law. As
a result, the Energy Authority, with a resolution as of
December 12, 2005, decided not to fine Enel Produzione,
although it reserved the possibility of imposing orders on it to
prevent similar events. The close of the inquiry with respect to
distribution companies, initially scheduled for April 2006, has
been postponed until October 30, 2006. The Energy Authority
can impose sanctions on, or request undertakings from,
distribution companies it holds at fault in the blackout.
We believe that the blackout, given its intensity and nature,
should be considered an unforeseen and unforeseeable event. As a
result, we do not believe we should be held liable for this
event. Furthermore, we believe that the occurrence of the
blackout is outside the scope of the indemnity obligations
provided for under our electricity supply contracts and the
Energy Authority’s regulations.
Brownout litigation
The Italian electricity supply experienced certain disruptions
on June 26, 2003. These disruptions, which we effected upon
request of the GRTN, were defense procedures carried out when
the electricity available could not satisfy demand, and were
intended to prevent the entire electricity system from
collapsing. The disruptions lasted for approximately 90 minutes
each and concerned an aggregate of approximately 7 million
customers. The Energy Authority’s initial inquiry into
these disruptions was completed in November 2003. In its
December 2003 report, the Energy Authority primarily attributed
the low amount of electricity available, which resulted in the
adoption of these defense procedures, to certain structural
causes, including insufficient domestic generation capacity, the
resulting dependence of the Italian electricity system on
imported electricity, and the reduction of the available
interconnection capacity available attributable to a heat wave,
as well as to certain specific conditions (including an
800 MW reduction of imports of electricity from France
under an import agreement between Enel and EDF). The Energy
Authority censured GRTN and generation companies, including us,
arguing that the disruptions were due, among other things, to
the unavailability of certain plants that we were required to
maintain in operations. We have contested the conclusions
reached by the Energy Authority. In April 2004, the Energy
Authority initiated a formal inquiry to determine the
responsibilities of the parties involved in these
events. In light of the results of the preliminary
investigations and in order to gain certainty and limit the
possible negative effects on us, in September 2004, we decided
to pay a fine of
€52,000 to settle
the potential claims against us, as permitted by Italian law. In
January 2005, the Energy Authority ended these proceedings, and
directed the GRTN not to pay us approximately
€75 million
in sums due to us for the provision of reserve capacity in the
first half of 2003. We have challenged the Energy
Authority’s direction before the Administrative Tribunal of
Lombardy, which on July 21, 2005, issued a decision
favorable to Enel. The Energy Authority has appealed this
decision before the Council of State. A hearing on this case has
not yet been scheduled.
In addition, as of May 2006, three of our customers had
commenced legal proceedings against Enel Distribuzione or Enel
Produzione in Italian courts to seek refunds and damages for
relatively minor amounts for the disruption in service related
to the brownout and, in some cases, also with respect to the
blackout of September 2003. To date, Italian courts have not
issued any decisions in these proceedings. Italian law does not
provide for the award of punitive damages in such cases, and
plaintiffs will be limited to compensatory damages, if any.
INPS circular
On May 6, 2005, INPS, Istituto Nazionale Previdenza
Sociale, the Italian social security fund, issued a circular
purporting to extend to formerly state-owned companies and
national public entities carrying out industrial activities an
obligation for employers to make certain social security
contributions. As state-owned entities, these companies were
exempted from this obligation. In the circular, INPS indicated
that this obligation would be applied with retroactive effect as
of the date of privatization of the relevant entity. The term
set forth in the circular for the settlement of the outstanding
contributions by the entities identified in the circular,
including Enel Group companies, was originally set for
August 16, 2005 and was postponed several times by INPS in
light of the complexity of the issue.
Enel challenged the INPS circular before the Administrative
Tribunal of Lazio and, subsequently, the Council of State, which
both declined to exercise jurisdiction. Therefore, in December
2005 Enel brought an action before the Tribunal of Rome to
determine whether the Enel Group companies are required to make
such contributions. The first hearing on the matter was held on
May 18, 2006 and a subsequent hearing has been scheduled
for October 12, 2006.
In March 2006, the Council of State, upon INPS’ request,
expressed the opinion that INPS may not impose retroactive
obligations. Though this opinion supports our position, it is
not binding on the Tribunal of Rome and we cannot exclude that
this court will state that the INPS circular applies to us,
whether for the period after its issuance or also retroactively.
In such cases, we estimate that the amounts we would be required
to pay would total to approximately
€80 million
per year.
In December 2005, the Ministry of Labor began a formal inquiry
to assess whether the conditions to exempt Enel and its
subsidiaries from the social security contributions related to
involuntary unemployment still exist. At the close of this
inquiry, if necessary, Enel will take the appropriate legal
actions.
Alleged abuse of market power proceedings
Since 1997, several suppliers of equipment to our distribution
division have brought civil actions against us claiming that we
abused our market power in the Italian electricity distribution
sector by imposing contractual terms and conditions on them. The
plaintiffs have sought increases in the compensation paid to
them under supply contracts with us. We are contesting the
suppliers’ claims. The first three decisions rendered in
these cases upheld our contention that civil courts lack
jurisdiction to hear these cases. In 1995, the Antitrust
Authority, prompted by similar claims filed by the same
suppliers, issued an opinion in which it held that our conduct
did not constitute an abuse of market power. Following the
withdrawal of the petitions filed by several suppliers, the
aggregate value of the claims currently pending against us is
€163 million.
In January 2004, an expert appointed by the Court of Bari, where
one of the proceedings was pending, confirmed the opinion issued
by the Antitrust Authority and, as a result, on August 9,2005, the Court of Bari rejected the plaintiff’s claim.
Alleged abuse of dominant position by Enel Energia.
On March 7, 2002, the Antitrust Authority began an
investigation to assess whether Enel, through one of its
subsidiaries, Enel Energia, abused its dominant position by,
among other things, including in its standard contract for the
sale of electricity to Eligible Customers in 2002 certain
exclusivity and priority clauses aimed at discouraging them from
changing their electricity supplier. On November 27, 2003,
the Antitrust Authority determined that this conduct constituted
a serious violation of the European Community Treaty and imposed
a fine of
€2.5 million.
Enel paid the fine, but appealed the Antitrust Authority’s
ruling before the Administrative Tribunal of Lazio, arguing that
it did not hold a dominant position in the market during the
period at issue and therefore could not have abused a dominant
position, and that the conduct of Enel Energia cannot be
attributed to Enel. In May 2006 the Administrative Tribunal of
Lazio rejected the appeal. Once the reasoning of this decision
is published, Enel will decide whether to appeal this decision.
Alleged abuse of dominant position by Enel and Enel
Produzione
On April 6, 2005, as a result of Energy Authority
investigations in June 2004 and January 2005 into sharp
increases in the price of electricity on the Italian power
exchange, the Antitrust Authority opened proceedings for alleged
abuse of dominant position against Enel and Enel Produzione. In
particular, the Antitrust Authority alleges that Enel used its
market power to fix prices, in order to either advantage or
disadvantage competitors, by taking advantage of differences in
prices among different zones of the market. The close of these
antitrust proceedings, which was expected by March 31,2006, has been postponed to October 15, 2006. If the
Antitrust Authority were to hold us liable for the abusive
practices alleged, it could impose a fine on us of up to 10% of
our total revenues in the preceding fiscal year.
Alleged abuse of dominant position by Enel Viesgo
Generaciņn
On November 8, 2004, the Spanish Antitrust Authority
initiated proceedings against our subsidiary Enel Viesgo
Generaciņn for abuse of dominant position with respect to
alleged violations of the antitrust law in 2002 and 2003. In
November 2005, the Spanish Antitrust Authority, following a
preliminary investigation, submitted the proceedings to the
Spanish Antitrust Court (the Tribunal de Defensa de la
Competencia). We expect this proceeding to last for
approximately one year. If the Spanish Antitrust Court holds
Enel Viesgo Generaciņn liable for this alleged violation of
antitrust law, it could impose on Enel Viesgo Generaciņn a
fine of up to 10% of its total revenues in the preceding year.
On May 8, 2006 the Spanish Antitrust Authority initiated a
new proceeding against Enel Viesgo Generaciņn for abuse of
dominant position with respect to alleged violations of the
antitrust law in 2004. Although we believe we should not be held
liable for any violation of antitrust law, we are not able to
predict the ultimate outcome of this antitrust proceeding.
Orimulsion arbitration
Until December 31, 2003, we had a contract to purchase
specified quantities of orimulsion from Bitumenes Orinoco S.A.
(“Bitor”), a Venezuelan company owned by Petroleos de
Venezuela S.A. At the end of 2003, we negotiated a renewal
contract with Bitor that was initialed by Bitor but never
formally executed. In January 2004, Bitor provided us with
approximately 80,000 tons of orimulsion. However, in February
2004, Bitor informed us that it would no longer supply
orimulsion to us, as the Venezuelan Energy Ministry had not
approved the contract. Nonetheless, in March 2004, Bitor sold us
a similar amount of orimulsion in a spot transaction. After
seeking an amicable settlement of the dispute, on March 17,2005, we filed a request for arbitration with the International
Chamber of Commerce in Paris, seeking damages provisionally
quantified at $200 million, as well as further damages, to
be quantified subsequently, related to the loss of investments
we had made in connection with plans to convert our Porto Tolle
power plant to burn orimulsion. Following the appointment of the
arbitration panel, in October 2005 the parties signed the Terms
of Reference and agreed on a timetable. The parties have already
delivered their memorials and a first hearing has been scheduled
for October 2006.
Enel Distribuzione was involved in a dispute with Echelon Corp.
concerning what we consider to be Echelon’s violation of
its obligation to supply us worldwide with the same type of
Telemanagement system products that it currently supplies to us
in Italy and its obligation to support us in the marketing of
these products. On April 27, 2004, we filed a request for
arbitration of this dispute with the International Chamber of
Commerce, seeking damages amounting to approximately
€40 million
or, as an alternative remedy, an appropriate extension of the
duration of Echelon’s obligations. On September 19,2005, the Arbitral Tribunal issued its award, partially
upholding our claim and ordering Echelon to pay Enel
Distribuzione approximately
€4 million
(plus interest) for loss of business opportunities, as well as
with partial compensation of our legal fees and expenses.
Congestion fees litigation with the Energy Authority
In November 2004, the Energy Authority issued a decision
requiring us to pay the GRTN congestion fees in an amount of
approximately
€31 million
in connection with our long-term electricity import contracts.
We challenged this decision in the Administrative Court of
Lombardy, but in December 2005, the Administrative Court
rejected our appeal. Before the Administrative Court’s
decision, we had already paid a total amount of
€32 million.
We do not intend to appeal this decision.
Suspension of the conversion works at the Torrevaldaliga Nord
power plant
On February 10, 2006, the Region of Lazio issued an order
to suspend all sea-based activities related to the conversion to
coal of the Torrevaldaliga Nord power plant on the basis of
environmental concerns. According to the Region of Lazio the
authorization already obtained by us for the conversion to coal
does not cover the sea-based activities and therefore the
conversion to coal requires a new assessment of the
environmental impact pursuant to the applicable European
Directive 97/11.
This suspension has resulted in the complete block of all the
sea-based activities. We immediately challenged the suspension
order before the Administrative Court of Lazio.
Moreover, with two subsequent orders as of March 28, 2006
and March 31, 2006, the Region of Lazio refused to grant us
the authorization to carry out sea dredging activities and
confirmed the suspension order of February 10, 2006. We
have also challenged these subsequent orders and during the
first hearing as of April 20, 2006, the Administrative
Court of Lazio temporarily authorized the dredging activities
hereof. On May 29, 2006 the Administrative Tribunal of
Lazio finally ruled in favor of Enel and authorized all
sea-based activities.
Criminal proceedings involving certain former Enelpower
executives
In February 2003, the public prosecutor of Milan initiated a
criminal investigation of the former chief executive officer of
Enelpower, a former senior executive of Enelpower, and 12 other
persons for the alleged commission of certain crimes, including
embezzlement, fraud, corruption, and false statements to
shareholders, in connection with certain transactions carried
out by Enelpower in the Middle East and Italy, including
transactions with the Siemens and Alstom groups. On
March 5, 2003, Enelpower was notified of the pending
investigation and the possible administrative liability it may
incur in relation to the alleged crimes. On June 6, 2003,
the Court of Milan, upon request by the public prosecutor,
ordered the arrest of the former chief executive officer and the
former senior executive of Enelpower on suspicion of such
charges.
In response to this criminal proceeding, we and our subsidiary
Enelpower initiated legal actions against all Enelpower
employees involved in the alleged offenses, aimed at protecting
the interests of the Enel Group and those of Enel’s
shareholders. In addition, Enelpower notified its suppliers
involved in the investigation that, in the event the alleged
illegal conduct should be proven, Enelpower would seek
compensation for damages suffered as a result. On July 11,2003, the former chairman of Enel Produzione resigned after
voluntarily disclosing to the public prosecutor of Milan the
extent of his involvement in the alleged illegal conduct that is
the subject of the prosecutor’s investigation. We and Enel
Produzione intend to seek any damages caused to us by the
alleged illegal conduct, should such conduct be proved as a
result of the pending investigation. None of the individuals
charged to date are currently employed by us.
We submitted to the Court of Milan a copy of a settlement
agreement between us and Siemens S.p.A. under which we received
€20 million
from Siemens S.p.A. for damages to our reputation, as well as
the right to renegotiate existing agreements between Siemens
S.p.A. and Enel Produzione. In April 2004, the Court of Milan,
as a cautionary measure, banned Siemens AG from receiving
contracts from public entities in Italy related to the supply of
gas turbines because of its alleged illicit relationship with
members of management of Enelpower and the former chairman of
Enel Produzione. On February 19, 2004, we entered into a
settlement with Alstom Holdings S.A., Alstom Power Inc. and
Alstom Power Italia S.p.A. providing for damages to us for
injury to our reputation of
€2.5 million,
in cash, and of
€2 million,
in the form of credits applicable to future purchases by any
Enel Group company from any Alstom Group company.
As a result of these criminal proceedings, in December 2004, the
Court of Accounts issued a decree freezing the assets and the
credits of the former chief executive officer, a former senior
executive and a former manager of Enelpower and the former
chairman of Enel Produzione and summoned them to appear in court
to ascertain their alleged responsibility with regards to
economic loss for the government. On February 18, 2005,
this decree was confirmed by a court order. On November 9,2005, Enel, Enel Produzione and Enelpower intervened before the
Court of Accounts to support the Court of Accounts’ decree.
On November 18, 2005, the former chief executive officer of
Enelpower brought an action before the Italian Supreme Court,
challenging the jurisdiction of the Court of Accounts to decide
on the matter. Although the Supreme Court has not yet decided on
the matter, in February 2006, the Court of Accounts ordered the
former chief executive officer, the former senior executive, a
former manager of Enelpower and the former chairman of Enel
Produzione, to pay approximately
€14 million
on a pro rata basis for the economic loss caused to
the government.
In November 2005, Enel Produzione summoned the former chairman
of Enel Produzione and certain of his heirs before the Court of
Milan requesting that certain transfers of property made by him
be revoked. In May 2006, also Enelpower summoned the former
chief executive officer and the former senior executive of
Enelpower requesting the revocation of certain transfers of
property.
We do not expect these proceedings to have an adverse effect on
our financial condition and results of operations.
Dividend Policy
Enel’s shareholders are entitled to receive interim or
annual dividends that the Company’s board of directors
recommends and, in the case of annual dividends, that the
Company’s shareholders approve.
Dividends were declared and paid in Italian lire until
July 8, 2001. On July 9, 2001, the re-denomination of
the Company’s share capital into euros and a one-for-two
reverse stock split became effective, and since then dividends
have been declared and paid in euros. The following table shows
the amount in euros of the Company’s dividends per share
payable in respect of each of the fiscal years indicated, based
on the 6,063,075,189 ordinary shares outstanding in 2001, 2002
and 2003, the 6,103,521,864 ordinary shares outstanding in 2004
and the 6,157,071,646 outstanding in 2005.
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
Dividends per ordinary share (in euros)(1)
€0.36
€0.36
€0.36
€0.69
€0.63
Dividends per ordinary share (in U.S. dollars)(2)
$0.32
$0.38
$0.45
$0.87
$0.78
(1)
The amount of the aggregate dividend for each of 2001, 2002,
2003, 2004 and 2005 was equal to approximately 52%, 109%, 87%,
162% and 100% of our consolidated net income for the relevant
year, respectively (with the amounts used for 2004 and 2005
being under IFRS).
(2)
We have translated the historical dividend amounts into
U.S. dollars using the noon buying rate for euro in effect
on the respective payment dates. The noon buying rate for euro
may differ from the rate that may be used by the Depositary for
the ADSs in order to convert euro into U.S. dollars for
purposes of making payments to holders of ADSs.
On November 24, 2005, Enel paid an interim dividend of
€0.19 per
share, amounting in the aggregate to approximately
€1,169 million,
with this amount taking into account the capital gain realized
by Enel in
connection with the disposal of a stake in Terna. Please see
“Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and
Prospects — Liquidity and Capital
Resources — Cash Flow Analysis.”
At the annual meeting held on May 26, 2006, Enel’s
shareholders resolved to pay an aggregate dividend of
approximately
€3.9 billion,
or €0.63 per
ordinary share, in respect of the fiscal year that ended
December 31, 2005, including the interim dividend paid in
November 2005. As a result, the balance of the dividend (equal
to €0.44 per
share) was paid on June 22, 2006, to holders of record as
of the close of business on June 16, 2006. The amount of
this aggregate dividend would be equal to approximately 100% of
our consolidated net income for the year.
Dividends payable on Enel’s ordinary shares to individuals
or entities not resident in Italy may be subject to deduction of
Italian withholding tax. Please see “Item 10.
Additional Information — Taxation —
Withholding Tax on Dividends.”
Italian law allows Enel to pay dividends only out of the
Company’s statutory retained earnings, plus the
distributable reserves and statutory net income for the current
year, net of the amount to be allocated to the legal reserve.
Please see “Item 10. Additional
Information — By-Laws — Dividend
Rights.” Enel’s board will recommend the payment of
any future dividends in light of conditions then existing,
including:
•
our financial performance;
•
cash and capital requirements;
•
any restrictions in financing agreements; and
•
prevailing business conditions.
Enel pays dividends on ordinary shares represented by ADSs to
the Depositary. The Depositary converts the dividends into
U.S. dollars at the prevailing rate of exchange, net of
conversion expenses of the Depositary and any applicable Italian
withholding tax. The amount of dividends received by holders of
ADSs in U.S. dollars may be affected by fluctuations in
exchange rates. Please see “Item 3. Key
Information — Exchange Rates” and
“Item 3. Key Information — Risk
Factors — Risks Relating to Enel’s Ordinary
Shares and ADSs — The value, expressed in dollars, of
the ordinary shares and ADSs and of any dividends Enel pays in
respect of its ordinary shares and ADSs will be affected by the
euro/dollar exchange rate” for a more detailed discussion
of the risks of euro/dollar exchange rate fluctuations for
holders of ADSs.
Significant Changes
On February 8, 2006, we completed the divestiture of our
interest in Wind, by selling to one of Weather Investments’
subsidiaries an additional 6.28% stake in Wind for
€328 million,
and thereafter, transferring to Weather Investments the
remaining 30.97% stake in Wind in exchange for shares
representing 20.9% of Weather Investments’ share capital.
As a result of these transactions, we no longer have any direct
interest in Wind and we received an aggregate cash consideration
of
€3,009 million
and a 26.1% interest in Weather Investments. In addition, we
entered into a shareholders’ agreement with Weather
Investments II S.a.r.l., Weather Investments’
controlling shareholder, which provides for an initial public
offering of Weather Investments when market conditions are
favorable, and for both our and Weather Investments II
S.a.r.l.’s undertakings, subject to certain exceptions, not
to sell any share of Weather Investments before the initial
public offering. Moreover, the shareholders’ agreement
grants de facto consent rights to identified directors
(including directors designated by us) over certain transactions
taken by Weather Investments or its subsidiaries (for example,
transactions effected to incur additional indebtedness or to
sell certain material assets). For more information on the
divestiture of our interest in Wind, please see
“Item 4. Information on the Company —
Business — The Enel Group — Discontinued
Operations — Telecommunications.”
In January 2006 we distributed 1.02% of Terna’s share
capital as “bonus” shares that we had promised to
certain Italian retail investors as part of the Terna IPO we
launched in June 2004, thus reducing our current stake in Terna
to 5.12%. For more information on this transaction please see
“Item 4. Information on the Company —
Business — The Enel Group — Discontinued
Operations — Transmission.”
On April 28, 2006 we acquired a 66% interest in Slovenske
Elektrarne (“SE”) for a total consideration
of approximately
€840 million.
SE has a total gross installed capacity of 7,000 MW, of
which 38% is nuclear-powered, 37% is hydroelectric-powered and
25% is powered by conventional thermal sources. This acquisition
marks our re-entry into the field of nuclear power generation;
we have not owned any nuclear power plants since November
2000, and we have not produced electricity from nuclear power
plants since 1988. Please see “Item 4. Information on
the Company — Regulatory Matters —
Environmental Matters — Discontinued Nuclear
Operations.”
In May 2006, Uniņn Fenosa Generaciņn SA exercised its
option and repurchase 30% of EUFR for approximately
€82 million.
As a result, Uniņn Fenosa Generaciņn SA and we each
hold 50% of EUFR.
ITEM 9.
THE OFFER AND LISTING
Markets and Price Range of ADSs and Ordinary Shares
The principal trading market for Enel’s ordinary shares is
the Telematico, the Italian automated screen-based trading
system managed by the Borsa Italiana. Enel’s shares are
traded on the Telematico under the symbol “ENEL.”
Enel’s American Depositary Shares, or ADSs (each
representing 5 ordinary shares), are listed on the New York
Stock Exchange, where they are traded under the symbol
“EN.” Effective March 31, 2006, Enel removed
Citibank, N.A. as depositary for purposes of issuing the
American Depositary Receipts evidencing the ADSs and appointed
as successor depositary JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. Trading in
Enel’s ordinary shares on the Telematico and in Enel’s
ADSs on the New York Stock Exchange commenced on
November 2, 1999.
The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the
reported high and low sales prices of the ADSs on the New York
Stock Exchange, adjusted to reflect the effect of a one-for-two
reverse stock split effective as of July 9, 2001.
The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the
reported high and low “official” sales prices for the
ordinary shares on Telematico, adjusted to reflect the
one-for-two reverse stock split effective as of July 9,2001.
Ordinary Shares
High
Low
(In euros)
2001
8.051
5.650
2002
6.765
4.490
2003
6.022
5.015
2004
First Quarter
6.581
5.464
Second Quarter
6.920
6.454
Third Quarter
6.651
6.143
Fourth Quarter
7.245
6.570
2005
First Quarter
7.485
6.889
Second Quarter
7.53
6.977
Third Quarter
7.30
6.845
Fourth Quarter
7.147
6.499
December 2005-May 2006
December 2005
6.815
6.632
January 2006
7.005
6.675
February 2006
7.189
6.861
March 2006
7.073
6.853
April 2006
6.995
6.695
May 2006
6.978
6.715
Enel’s ordinary shares are among the constituents of the
S&P/ MIB Index, the primary Italian stock market index.
As of May 24, 2006, 6,167,056,262 ordinary shares were
outstanding. On May 31, 2006, the closing price of
Enel’s ordinary shares on Telematico was
€6.955 and the
closing price of the ADSs on the New York Stock Exchange was
$44.76.
In September 2004, Enel’s stock was added to the DJSI (Dow
Jones Sustainability Index) World, a global index tracking the
financial performance of selected
“sustainability-driven” companies worldwide.
ITEM 10.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Stock Option Plans
Enel’s board of directors has approved stock option
incentive plans that have been made available to an aggregate of
approximately 800 Group executives, as identified from time to
time by the board of directors at the time of the grant.
Currently, the stock option plans approved by Enel’s board
of directors in 2002, 2003, and 2004 are still in force, while
the stock option plans approved in 2000 and 2001 have expired,
and the stock option plan approved in 2005 has lapsed since the
conditions precedent set forth therein have not been satisfied.
The terms of the stock option plans currently in force generally
include the following: in the event that the conditions
precedent have been satisfied, the options are exercisable
starting one year after they are granted and until the fifth
year after their grant; however, during the first three or four
years (depending on the plan) during which exercise is permitted,
vesting of the options is limited to annual cumulative tranches
(varying from 15% to 40%). Under the 2002 and 2003 plans,
options may be exercised each year only within the fifteen
trading days following each of (i) the board of
directors’ approval of preliminary financial data for the
preceding fiscal year on a consolidated basis, (ii) the
shareholders’ approval of the financial statements for the
preceding fiscal year, and (iii) the board of
directors’ approval of the report relating to the quarter
ending September 30. Under the 2004 plan, the options are
exercisable each year at any time other than during the period
(i) beginning on the date that is one month prior to the
day scheduled for the approval of Enel’s annual financial
statements by its board of directors and ending on the date of
such approval and (ii) beginning on the date that is one
month prior to the day scheduled for the approval of Enel’s
half-year report by its board of directors and ending on the
date of such approval. Options become exercisable if both the
Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization
(EBITDA) of the Group for the fiscal year in which the
options are granted exceeds the estimated EBITDA as indicated in
the budget approved by the board of directors for the relevant
year, and the price of Enel’s shares on Telematico
outperforms a specified reference index over the same period. If
any of these conditions is not met, all the options expire. The
strike price of the options is set by the board of directors on
the date of the grant and cannot be lower than the average
reference price of Enel’s shares on Telematico during the
month preceding the grant. The number of options granted under
the 2002 and 2003 plans to participating managers was determined
pursuant to a formula based on the participant’s gross
salary for the year in question and the value of an option
exercisable in the third year following its grant, calculated
according to market value indications. Under the 2004 plan,
options were granted using a new method based on proportional
criteria. In any case options are not transferable inter
vivos.
At the annual meeting held on May 26, 2006, Enel’s
shareholders vested the board of directors with the powers
necessary to implement a new stock option incentive plan, as
approved by the same shareholders’ meeting, for the amount
of 31,790,000 options (for a corresponding number of newly
issued Enel’s ordinary shares), to be made available to
approximately 470 Group executives, including the chief
executive officer in his capacity as general manager (who would
be entitled to 1,500,000 options). Under this plan, options
become exercisable if both the Earnings Before Interest, Taxes,
Depreciation and Amortization (EBITDA) of the Group for the
relevant fiscal years specified in the stock option plan exceeds
the estimated EBITDA as indicated in the budget approved by
Enel’s board of directors for the same fiscal years, and
the price of Enel’s shares on Telematico outperforms a
specified reference index over the same period. If any of these
conditions is not met, all the options expire. In particular,
the plan provides that 25% of the options granted will become
exercisable on the condition that in the two-year period
2006-2007 the aforesaid objectives are jointly attained, while
the exercise of the remaining 75% of the options granted is
subject to the attainment of both of the same objectives during
the three-year period 2006-2008. In the event that only one or
neither of the objectives is attained during the two-year period
2006-2007, however, provision is made for the possibility of
recovering the first 25% of the options granted if the same
objectives are both attained in the longer time period
2006-2008. In the event that the conditions precedent have been
satisfied, vesting of the options occurs in three annual
cumulative tranches of respectively 25% in 2008, 35% in 2009 and
the remaining 40% in 2010. The final deadline for the exercise
of all the options is December 31, 2012. When implementing
the stock option plan in the second half of 2006, Enel’s
board of directors will determine other details of the stock
option plan, such as the strike price, on the basis of
applicative criteria established by the shareholders’
meeting of May 26, 2006.
From 2003 through 2006, Enel’s board of directors
determined that the conditions precedent for all of the options
granted under the 2002, 2003, and 2004 plans were satisfied
during the reference period and therefore such options could be
exercised according to the terms of the relevant stock option
plan, while the conditions precedent for the 2005 plan were not
satisfied during the reference period and such options therefore
lapsed automatically.
The following table lists each of our stock option plans by
date, number of grantees, total options granted, options
exercised as of May 24, 2006, strike price and scheduled
expiration date:
Including Enel’s former chief executive officers,
Mr. Tatņ and Mr. Scaroni, each in his capacity as
general managers (direttori generali), as well as
Enel’s current chief executive officer, Mr. Conti, in
his capacity as chief financial officer.
(2)
The strike price for the options granted to Enel’s former
chief executive officer, Mr. Scaroni, was determined with
regard to the reference price of Enel’s shares on
Telematico on the date of his appointment as general manager
(direttore generale), and was therefore set at
€6.480.
(3)
Including Enel’s former chief executive officer,
Mr. Scaroni, in his capacity as general manager
(direttore generale) as well as Enel’s current chief
executive officer, Mr. Conti, in his capacity as chief
financial officer.
(4)
The conditions for the exercise of options under the 2005 plan
were not satisfied, therefore none of the options granted
thereunder became exercisable.
In connection with the stock option plans approved by
Enel’s board of directors, Enel’s shareholders have
resolved to authorize the board of directors to increase
Enel’s share capital by a certain maximum amount. As a
result:
(i) under the May 2001 authorization, on April 10,2003, Enel’s board of directors resolved to increase the
Company’s share capital by an amount not to exceed
€41,748,500
through the issuance (in one or more tranches) of a maximum of
41,748,500 new ordinary shares to satisfy the exercise of
options granted under the 2002 plan and to be subscribed for by
December 31, 2007; as of May 24, 2006, 35,007,900
ordinary shares had been issued in connection with the exercise
of an equivalent number of options under the 2002 plan;
(ii) under the May 2003 authorization, on April 7,2004, Enel’s board of directors resolved to increase the
Company’s share capital by an amount not to exceed
€47,624,005
through the issuance (in one or more tranches) of a maximum of
47,624,005 new ordinary shares to satisfy the exercise of
options granted under the 2003 plan and to be subscribed for by
December 31, 2008; as of May 24, 2006, 38,337,287
ordinary shares had been issued in connection with the exercise
of an equivalent number of options under the 2003 plan;
(iii) under the May 2004 authorization, on March 30,2005, Enel’s board of directors resolved to increase the
Company’s share capital by an amount not to exceed
€38,527,550
through the issuance (in one or more tranches) of a maximum of
38,527,550 new ordinary shares to satisfy the exercise of
options granted under the 2004 plan and to be subscribed for by
December 31, 2009; as of May 24, 2006, 14,334,553
ordinary shares had been issued in connection with the exercise
of an equivalent number of options under the 2004 plan;
(iv) at the annual meeting held on May 26, 2005,
Enel’s shareholders authorized the board of directors, for
a period of five years, to increase Enel’s share capital by
a maximum total amount of
€28,757,000 in
order to permit the issuance (in one or more tranches) of a
maximum of 28,757,000 new ordinary shares under the terms of the
2005 stock option plan. Given that one of the two conditions
precedent for the exercise of the options was not satisfied, the
options granted under the 2005 plan are not exercisable and such
authorization to increase Enel’s share capital lapsed
automatically;
(iv) at the annual meeting held on May 26, 2006,
Enel’s shareholders authorized the board of directors, for
a period of five years, to increase Enel’s share capital by
a maximum total amount of
€31,790,000 in
order to permit the issuance (in one or more tranches) of a
maximum of 31,790,000 new ordinary shares under the terms of the
2006 stock option plan, as approved by the same annual meeting.
This authorization, together with those granted in previous
years and not yet utilized or expired, would entail a maximum
potential dilution of Enel’s share capital amounting to
1.15%.
In March 2004, the board of directors resolved to grant,
beginning in 2004, a special bonus to those beneficiaries of our
various stock option plans who exercise their options, in an
amount to be determined by the board of directors each time it
adopts resolutions concerning the allocation of earnings. The
amount of the bonuses is based on the portion of the
“divestiture dividends” (as defined below) distributed
after the date the options were granted.
The premise on which this initiative is based is that the
portion of dividends attributable to extraordinary transactions
regarding the divestiture of property and/or financial assets
(so-called “divestiture dividends”) be considered as a
return to shareholders of a portion of the Company’s value,
which, as such, has the potential to affect the price of the
Company’s shares. This bonus is intended to benefit the
beneficiaries of the stock option plans who — because
of choices they have made or restrictions imposed under the
terms of our stock option plans — exercise their
options after the ex-dividend date for any “divestiture
dividends.” These bonuses are paid only with respect to the
portion of any dividend that constitutes a “divestiture
dividend,” and not with respect to any portion of a
dividend relating to ordinary business activities or
reimbursements arising from regulatory measures.
Starting in 2004, when beneficiaries of our stock option plans
exercise their options, they are entitled to receive a bonus
amount related to any “divestiture dividends”
distributed by Enel after the date the options were granted, but
prior to their exercise. The bonus in question will be paid by
the company of the Enel Group that employs the beneficiary, and
is subject to ordinary taxation as employee income.
To date, Enel’s board of directors has
approved: (i) a bonus amounting to
€0.08 per
option exercised after the ex-dividend date of June 18,2004, with respect to the
€0.36 per
share dividend related to the Company’s results in 2003;
(ii) a bonus amounting to
€0.33 per
option exercised after the ex-dividend date of November 19,2004, with respect to the 2004 interim dividend of the same
amount per share; (iii) a bonus amounting to
€0.02 per
option exercised after the ex-dividend date of June 17,2005, with respect to the balance of the 2004 dividend of
€0.36 per
share; and (iv) a bonus amounting to
€0.19 per
option exercised after the ex-dividend date of November 18,2005, with respect to the 2005 interim dividend of the same
amount per share.
The following is a summary of certain information concerning
Enel’s shares and by-laws (Statuto) and of Italian
law applicable to Italian companies whose shares are listed in a
regulated market in the European Union, as in effect at the date
of this annual report. The summary contains all the information
that we consider to be material regarding Enel’s shares but
does not purport to be complete, and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to the by-laws or Italian law, as the case
may be.
Italian companies whose shares are listed on a regulated market
of the European Union are principally governed by two sets of
rules: the Italian civil code (applicable to all Italian
companies), and the Unified Financial Act (Testo Unico
dell’Intermediazione Finanziaria, or TUF, of
February 24, 1998, as amended) and the related implementing
regulations applicable to listed companies. In January 2003, the
Italian government approved a wide-ranging reform of the
corporate law provisions of the Italian civil code, which took
effect on January 1, 2004. In February 2004, the Italian
government amended the TUF to coordinate it with the new
corporate law provisions of the Italian civil code. The
amendments to the Italian civil code and to the TUF constitute
the so-called 2004 corporate law reform. On May 21, 2004
Enel’s shareholders approved a number of amendments to
Enel’s by-laws dictated or made possible by the 2004
corporate law reform. In December 2005, the Italian parliament
adopted the Investor Protection Act of December 28, 2005,
which sets forth rules on corporate governance for listed
companies aimed at preventing financial scandals. A resolution
to amend the corporate by-laws in compliance with the new Act,
providing for the appointment of an officer responsible for the
preparation of corporate accounting documents, has been approved
by Enel’s shareholders meeting held on
May 26, 2006. Further amendments to Enel’s by-laws to
comply with the new statutory requirements will have to be
adopted by January 12, 2007; such amendments will be
adopted by the board of directors exercising the power vested in
it by the corporate by-laws to resolve on the harmonization of
such by-laws with the provisions of the law. The following
summary takes into account the 2004 corporate law reform, the
Investor Protection Act and the consequent amendments to
Enel’s by-laws.
General
In May 2001, the Company’s shareholders approved the
re-denomination of the Company’s share capital into euro
from lire and a one-for-two reverse stock split, effective
July 9, 2001. As a result, at that date, the issued and
outstanding share capital of the Company consisted of
6,063,075,189 ordinary shares, each with a par value of
€1. Before that
date, the Company’s share capital consisted of
12,126,150,379 ordinary shares, each with a par value of Lit.
1,000. In accordance with Italian law, in connection with the
re-denomination, Enel’s share capital was rounded down by
approximately Lit. 386.4 billion
(€199.5 million),
which the Company allocated to the legal reserve.
As of May 24, 2006, all of the Company’s 6,167,056,262
issued and outstanding ordinary shares are fully paid,
non-assessable and in registered form.
Enel’s registered office is in Rome, Italy, at Viale Regina
Margherita No. 137, and the Company is registered with the
Italian Companies’ Register held by the Chamber of Commerce
of Rome at No. 00811720580. As set forth in Article 4
of Enel’s by-laws, its corporate purpose is to acquire and
manage equity holdings in Italian and foreign companies, and to
provide such companies with strategic guidelines and
coordination regarding their industrial organization and
business activities. Enel’s by-laws identify the following
as Enel’s principal activities, which it may carry out
through its affiliates or subsidiaries: (i) the electricity
industry, including the activities of production, importation
and exportation, distribution and sale, as well as transmission
within the limits of existing legislation; (ii) the energy
industry in general, including the fuel sector, the field of
environmental protection and the water sector; (iii) the
communications, telematics and information-technology industries
and those of multimedia and interactive services; and
(iv) the network-based utility services sector
(electricity, water, gas, district heating, telecommunications)
and local metropolitan utility services. The board of directors
is generally authorized to take any actions necessary or useful
to achieve the Company’s corporate purpose.
Authorization of Shares
At the annual meeting held on May 26, 2006, Enel’s
shareholders authorized the board of directors, for a period of
five years, to increase Enel’s share capital by a maximum
total amount of
€31,790,000 in
order to permit the issuance (in one or more tranches) of a
maximum of 31,790,000 new ordinary shares under the terms of the
2006 stock option plan. This authorization, together with those
granted in previous years and not yet utilized or expired, would
entail a maximum potential dilution of Enel’s share capital
amounting to 1.15%.
One of the two conditions precedent for the exercise of the
options granted under the 2005 stock option plan was not
satisfied. As a result, none of the options granted under such
plan became exercisable and the authorization to increase the
share capital granted at the annual meeting held on May 26,2005, by Enel’s shareholders to the board of directors, was
not utilized and lapsed.
Under the authorization granted by Enel’s shareholders on
May 21, 2004, the board of directors on March 30, 2005
resolved to increase the Company’s share capital by a
maximum total amount of
€38,527,550 in
order to permit the issuance of a maximum of 38,527,550 new
ordinary shares in connection with the 2004 stock option plan.
Of these shares, as of May 24, 2006, 14,334,553 have
already been issued as result of the exercises of options under
the plan. See also “— Stock Option Plans.”
Form and Transfer of Shares
Pursuant to the TUF, Legislative Decree No. 213 of
June 24, 1998 (“Decree No. 213”) and CONSOB
Regulation No. 11768 of December 23, 1998
(“Regulation No. 11768”), as amended, since
January 1, 1999, shareholders can no longer obtain the
physical delivery of share certificates representing shares of
Italian listed
companies. Shares of Italian listed companies are no longer
represented by paper certificates and the transfer and exchange
of shares takes place exclusively through an electronic
book-entry system. All shares must, accordingly, be deposited by
their owners with an intermediary (each an
“Intermediary”), as identified by
Regulation No. 11768 more specifically:
•
an Italian or EU bank;
•
a non-EU bank authorized by the Bank of Italy to operate in the
Italian market;
•
Societą di Intermediazione Mobiliare, or SIM;
•
an EU investment company;
•
a non-EU investment company authorized by CONSOB to provide
investment services in Italy;
the controlling shareholder of the company which has issued the
shares;
•
the Bank of Italy;
•
an EU or non-EU entity operating a centralized clearing system;
•
a financial intermediary operating a clearing system governed by
art. 69 (2) and 70 of the TUF;
•
a financial intermediary registered on the list kept by the Bank
of Italy under art. 107 of Legislative Decree No. 385 of
September 1, 1993;
•
Poste Italiane S.p.A. (the Italian Post Office company);
•
Cassa Depositi e Prestiti;
•
the MEF; and
•
the managers of foreign clearing, settlement and guarantee
systems for financial instruments, provided that they are
subject to supervision equivalent to that provided by Italian
law.
The Intermediary in turn deposits the shares with Monte Titoli
S.p.A. (“Monte Titoli”) or with another company
authorized by CONSOB to operate a centralized clearing system.
To transfer shares under the system introduced by Decree
No. 213, owners of shares are required to give instructions
to their Intermediaries. If the transferee is a client of the
transferor’s Intermediary, the Intermediary simply
transfers the shares from the transferor’s account to the
account of the transferee. If, however, the transferee is a
client of another Intermediary, the transferor’s
Intermediary instructs the company operating a centralized
clearing system to transfer the shares to the account of the
transferee’s Intermediary, which will then record the
shares in the transferee’s account.
Each Intermediary maintains a custody account for each of its
clients setting out the financial instruments of such client and
keeps a record of all transfers, payment of dividends, exercise
of rights attributable to such instruments, charges or other
encumbrances on the instruments. The account holder or any other
eligible party (for example, in the case of a pledge over the
financial instrument, the pledge holder) may submit a request to
the Intermediary (i) for the issue of a certified statement
of account or, (ii) to participate in a shareholders’
meeting, for a communication to the issuer of the holder’s
ownership or title. The request must indicate the quantity of
the financial instruments in respect of which the statement is
requested, the rights which the applicant intends to exercise
and the duration in respect of which the certificate’s
validity is required. Within two business days from the receipt
of such request or, in the case of a communication, also within
the longer period of time, if any, indicated in the by-laws of
the issuer, the Intermediary shall issue a certified statement
of account or make a communication to the issuer that
constitutes evidence of the account holder’s ownership or
title of the financial instruments indicated. Once a certificate
has been issued, the Intermediary may not effect any transfer of
the
corresponding securities until the certificate expires or is
returned. If the by-laws of the issuer do not prohibit the
withdrawal of shares, or the related certification, before
shareholders’ meetings are held, the Intermediary that sent
the communication to the issuer shall inform the issuer without
delay of any transfers, in whole or in part, of the
corresponding financial instruments before the
shareholders’ meeting is held.
The shares have been accepted for clearance through Euroclear
and Clearstream. Purchasers of shares may elect to hold such
shares through Euroclear or Clearstream. Persons owning a
beneficial interest in shares held through Monte Titoli,
Euroclear and Clearstream must rely on the procedures of Monte
Titoli, Euroclear and Clearstream, respectively, and of the
Intermediaries that have accounts with Monte Titoli, Euroclear
and Clearstream, to exercise their rights as holders of shares.
Limitations on shareholdings
According to Italian privatization law (Law No. 474 of
July 30, 1994), Enel’s by-laws provide that no
shareholder other than the Italian government, public statutory
bodies and their respective subsidiaries may own ordinary shares
representing more than 3% of the Company’s share capital.
This limit does not apply in the event that it is exceeded as a
result of certain types of tender offers as provided under
Italian law.
The limitation on shareholdings is calculated taking into
account, among other things, shares owned by:
•
Controlling entities and directly or indirectly controlled
entities of the holder, as well as entities controlled by the
same controlling entity; and
•
Affiliated personal entities of the holder, including spouses
and other closely related personal relatives.
Italian privatization law and Enel’s by-laws restrict the
ability of any entity to exercise any voting rights attributable
to ordinary shares held or controlled by that entity
representing more than 3% of Enel’s share capital. This
restriction does not apply to any shareholdings held by the
Italian government, public statutory bodies and their respective
subsidiaries. The voting rights of each entity to whom this
limit on shareholdings applies are reduced correspondingly. In
the event that ordinary shares held or controlled in excess of
the 3% threshold are voted, any shareholders’ resolution
adopted pursuant to this vote may be challenged if the majority
required to approve this resolution would not have been reached
without the vote of ordinary shares held exceeding this
threshold. Ordinary shares not entitled to be voted, for the
above-mentioned reason, are nevertheless counted for purposes of
determining the quorum at a shareholders’ meeting. Further
limitations on shareholdings result from the special powers of
the MEF.
Special powers of the MEF
The Italian privatization law and the Company’s by-laws
confer upon the Italian government, acting through the MEF,
certain special powers with respect to Enel’s business and
actions by Enel’s shareholders. These powers may apply
regardless of the MEF’s shareholding in Enel. In September
2004, the government substantially confirmed the scope and
duration of the MEF’s special powers, taking into account,
among other factors, the liberalization level achieved by that
time in the European energy sector. The MEF exercises these
special powers after consultation with, and with the agreement
of, the Ministry of Productive Activities. The Italian budget
law for 2004 (Law No. 350 of December 24, 2003)
amended the regulations concerning the “special
powers” held by the government. Enel’s by-laws now
reflect the following special powers of the MEF:
Opposition to material acquisitions of shares
The MEF has the authority to oppose the acquisition by persons
or entities subject to the limitation on shareholdings (as
provided by Enel’s by-laws) of an interest in the Company
equal to or in excess of 3% of the share capital (including
ordinary shares held in the form of American Depositary Shares)
with voting rights at ordinary shareholders’ meetings, in
the event the Minister considers the transaction to be
detrimental to vital national interests. The MEF must express
any opposition to an acquisition by such a person or entity
within ten days of receiving notice from the board of directors
that a request to register such an interest in the
shareholders’ register has been made. During this ten-day
period, all non-economic rights, including the right to vote,
pertaining to the shares that represent the significant holding
are suspended. Should the MEF oppose a purchase
for due cause in an order setting out the concrete detriment the
transaction would cause to vital national interests, the
purchaser may not exercise the right to vote nor any other
non-economic right pertaining to the shares that represent the
significant holding, and must dispose of such shares within one
year. In case of failure to comply, upon request by the MEF, a
court will order the sale of the subject shares. The purchaser
has 60 days to challenge an order opposing its purchase
before the Administrative Tribunal of Lazio.
Opposition to material shareholders’ agreements
The MEF has the authority to oppose certain types of
shareholders agreements (please see
“— Notification of the Acquisition of Shares and
Voting Rights”) entered into by holders of at least
one-twentieth of the voting capital stock at ordinary
shareholders meetings, if it believes such an agreement would be
detrimental to vital national interests. Parties to these types
of agreement are required to notify CONSOB upon entry into such
an agreement, and CONSOB in turn notifies the MEF. The MEF must
oppose the agreement within 10 days of receiving this
notice from CONSOB. During this ten-day period, all non-economic
rights pertaining to the shares held by the parties to the
agreement, including the right to vote, are suspended. Should
the MEF oppose an agreement, for due cause in an order setting
out the concrete detriment the agreement would cause to vital
national interests, the agreement is not effective, and if it
appears from their conduct at a shareholders’ meeting that
the parties to the agreement are continuing to observe the
arrangement contemplated by the agreement, any resolution
adopted with the decisive vote of these shareholders may be
challenged in court. Any party to an agreement that the MEF
opposes has 60 days to challenge the MEF’s order
before the Administrative Tribunal of Lazio.
Members of Enel’s Board of Directors
The MEF has the power to appoint one non-voting member of
Enel’s board of directors in addition to the voting members
elected by the shareholders.
Veto power over material changes
The MEF, for due cause when it believes concrete detriment to
vital national interests would result, may veto any resolution
to dissolve, merge or demerge Enel, to transfer a significant
part of its business or its registered headquarters outside of
Italy, to change its corporate purpose or to eliminate or modify
any of the MEF’s special powers. Any such veto may be
challenged within 60 days by any dissenting shareholder
before the Administrative Tribunal of Lazio.
The special powers of the MEF reflected in Enel’s by-laws
are also reflected in the by-laws of Enel Produzione and Enel
Distribuzione.
Dividend Rights
The payment by Enel of any annual dividend is proposed by the
board of directors and is subject to the approval of the
shareholders at the annual shareholders’ meeting. Before
dividends may be paid out of Enel’s net income in any year,
an amount equal to 5% of such net income must be allocated to
Enel’s legal reserve until such reserve is at least equal
to one-fifth of the par value of Enel’s issued share
capital. As of December 31, 2005, the amount of Enel’s
legal reserve exceeded one-fifth of the par value of its issued
share capital. If Enel’s capital is reduced as a result of
accumulated losses, dividends may not be paid until the capital
is reconstituted or reduced by the amount of such losses. The
board of directors may authorize the distribution of interim
dividends, subject to certain statutory limitations.
Dividends are payable to those persons who hold shares through
an Intermediary on the day preceding the ex-dividend payment
date declared by the shareholders’ meeting. Dividends not
collected within five years from the dividend payment date are
forfeited to the benefit of the Company. Payments in respect of
dividends are distributed through Monte Titoli on behalf of each
shareholder by the Intermediary with which the shareholder has
deposited its shares. Holders of ADSs are entitled to receive
payments in respect of dividends on the underlying shares
through the Depositary, in accordance with Enel’s deposit
agreement with JPMorgan Chase
Bank relating to the ADRs (the “Deposit Agreement”).
Please see “Item 8. Financial Information —
Other Financial Information — Dividend Policy.”
Voting Rights
Shareholders are entitled to one vote per share, although a
slate voting system applies in case of appointment of members of
the board of directors and of the board of statutory auditors.
Please see “— Minority Shareholders’
Rights.”
Proxy solicitation may be carried out by certain professional
investment and financial intermediaries, as well as certain
companies whose sole purpose is to carry out proxy solicitation,
on behalf of a qualified soliciting shareholder (generally, one
or more shareholders who own and have owned at least 0.5% of
Enel’s shares for more than six months and who have been so
registered with Enel for the same period of time).
Proxies may be collected by a shareholders’ association
provided that such association has been formed by notarized
private agreement, does not carry out business activities and is
made up of at least 50 individuals, each of whom owns not more
than 0.1% of Enel’s voting capital. Members of the
shareholders’ association may, but are not obliged to,
grant proxies to the legal representative of the association,
and proxies may also be granted in respect of only certain of
the matters to be discussed at the relevant shareholders’
meeting. The association may vote in different manners in
compliance with the instructions expressed by each member who
has granted a proxy to the association.
As a registered shareholder and ADR depositary, JPMorgan Chase
Bank or its nominee is entitled to vote the shares underlying
the ADSs. The Deposit Agreement requires JPMorgan Chase Bank (or
its nominee) to accept voting instructions from owners of ADSs
and to execute such instructions to the extent permitted by law.
Board of Directors
Pursuant to Enel’s by-laws, Enel’s board of directors
must consist of no fewer than three and no more than nine
members. In addition, a non-voting director may be appointed by
the MEF according to its special powers. The board of directors
is elected at a shareholders’ meeting for a term of up to
three years. Directors are eligible for re-election. For
additional information on the election of directors, please see
“— Minority Shareholders’ Rights.”
In accordance with Enel’s by-laws, management of the
Company is the exclusive responsibility of the directors, who
carry out all actions necessary to achieve the corporate purpose.
In addition to exercising the powers entrusted to it by law,
Enel’s by-laws provide the board of directors with the
power to adopt resolutions concerning: mergers and demergers as
permitted by law; the establishment or elimination of secondary
headquarters; which directors shall have power to represent the
Company; the reduction of share capital in the event of the
withdrawal of one or more shareholder; the harmonization of the
by-laws with provisions of the law; and the transfer of the
Company’s registered office within Italy.
The chairman and chief executive officer are Enel’s legal
representatives. If a non voting director is appointed by the
MEF, he or she may not serve as chairman or as chief executive
officer. The chief executive officer generally has the power to
represent the Company within the scope of the functions
delegated to him. For specific actions or categories of actions,
the power to represent Enel can be delegated by the holder of
such power to one of Enel’s employees or to third parties.
The quorum for board meetings is a majority of the members in
office having the right to vote. Resolutions are adopted by a
majority of votes of those present. A board meeting may be
called by the chairman on his or her own initiative and must be
called upon a request by the board of statutory auditors (or at
least one of its members) or upon a request for a meeting for
specific purposes by at least two directors (or one director
when the board is composed of three members).
The board has the power to delegate certain of its powers to one
of its voting members, and determines the powers and the
functions delegated to such person. In accordance with Italian
law and Enel’s by-laws, the board of directors may not
delegate certain of its responsibilities, including those
relating to the approval of the draft
financial statements, the approval of merger and de-merger plans
to be presented to shareholders’ meetings, increases in the
amount of Enel’s share capital or the issuance of
convertible debentures (if any such power has been delegated to
the board of directors by vote of the extraordinary
shareholders’ meeting) and the calling of an ordinary or an
extraordinary shareholders’ meeting to resolve upon the
actions to be taken by Enel in case of decrease of Enel’s
shareholders’ equity to less than two-thirds of Enel’s
paid-in capital as a result of accumulated losses. See also
“— Meetings of Shareholders.”
Under Italian law, directors having any interest in a proposed
transaction must disclose their interest to the board, even if
such interest is not in conflict with the interest of the
company in the same transaction. The interested director is not
required to abstain from voting on the resolution approving the
transaction, but the resolution must state explicitly the
reasons for, and the benefit to the company of, the approved
transaction. In the event that these provisions are not complied
with, or that the transaction would not have been approved
without the vote of the interested director, the resolution may
be challenged by a director or by the board of statutory
auditors if the approved transaction may be prejudicial to the
company. A chief executive officer having any such interest in a
proposed transaction within the scope of his or her powers must
solicit prior board approval of such transaction. An interested
director may be held liable for damages to his company resulting
from a resolution adopted in breach of the above rules. Finally,
directors may be held liable for damages to their company if
they illicitly profit from insider information or corporate
opportunities.
Under Italian law, directors may be removed from office at any
time by the vote of shareholders at an ordinary
shareholders’ meeting, although if directors are removed in
circumstances where there was no just cause, such directors may
have a claim for indemnification against the company. Directors
may resign at any time by written notice to the board of
directors and to the chairman of the board of statutory
auditors. The board of directors must appoint substitute
directors to fill vacancies arising from removals or
resignations, subject to the approval of the board of statutory
auditors, to serve until the next shareholders’ meeting,
except for any non-voting director appointed by the MEF, whose
vacancy must be filled in by a substitute non-voting director
also appointed by the MEF (please see “— Special
powers of the MEF — Members of Enel’s Board of
Directors”). The MEF has not to date appointed a non-voting
member to Enel’s board. If at any time more than half of
the members of the board of directors appointed at a
shareholders’ meeting resigns or otherwise ceases to be
directors, the entire board of directors will be considered to
have lapsed and the remaining members of the board of directors
(or the board of statutory auditors if all the members of the
board of directors have resigned or ceased to be directors) must
promptly call an ordinary shareholders’ meeting to appoint
a new board of directors.
The compensation of directors is determined by shareholders at
ordinary shareholders’ meetings. The board of directors
determines, upon the proposal of the board compensation
committee and after having received the opinion of the board of
statutory auditors, the compensation of the chief executive
officer and the other directors holding specific offices.
Directors are entitled to reimbursement for expenses reasonably
incurred in connection with their functions.
Statutory Auditors
In addition to electing the board of directors, the
company’s shareholders elect a board of statutory auditors
(Collegio Sindacale) at ordinary shareholders’
meetings. The statutory auditors are elected for a term of three
fiscal years, may be re-elected for successive terms and may be
removed only for cause and with the approval of a competent
court.
Pursuant to certain provisions of the TUF (some of which still
have to be implemented through the adoption of specific
regulations by CONSOB), the by-laws of listed companies shall
specify the number of statutory auditors (not fewer than three)
and alternate members (not fewer than two). At least one member
of the board of statutory auditors must be elected (through a
procedure that shall be set forth by CONSOB) by the minority
shareholders. Moreover, the chairman of the board of statutory
auditors shall be appointed by the shareholders’ meeting
among the auditors elected by the minority shareholders.
Statutory auditors are subject to certain limits (that must be
set forth by CONSOB) concerning the cumulation of management and
control positions that they may have in other companies. The
Investor Protection
Act also imposes on the statutory auditors an obligation to
disclose, when appointed and before their acceptance, any
position held on the board of directors or board of statutory
auditors of other companies.
Enel’s by-laws currently provide that the board of
statutory auditors shall consist of three statutory auditors and
two alternate members (who are automatically substituted for a
statutory auditor who resigns or is otherwise unable to serve).
Enel’s by-laws also provide, as allowed both under the
former and the current regime (at least until the enactment of
new regulations by CONSOB), that the statutory auditors may not
hold the position of statutory auditor in five or more other
listed companies (not counting our subsidiaries). As to the
election of statutory auditors, please see
“— Minority Shareholders Rights.”
The TUF provides further that the board of statutory auditors
will be required to verify that the company (i) complies
with applicable law and its by-laws, (ii) respects the
principles of correct administration, (iii) maintains
adequate organizational structure, internal controls and
administrative and accounting systems, (iv) adequately
instructs its subsidiaries to transmit to it information
relevant to the its disclosure obligations, and
(v) correctly implements the corporate governance rules set
forth by codes of conduct drawn up by management companies of
regulated markets or by trade associations that the company
publicly discloses a commitment to comply with.
Each member of the board of statutory auditors must provide
certain evidence that he or she is in good standing and meets
certain professional standards.
Enel’s board of statutory auditors is required to meet at
least once every 90 days. In addition, the statutory
auditors of the Company must be present at meetings of the
company’s board of directors and shareholders’
meetings and at meetings of the Company’s executive
committee, if any. The statutory auditors may decide to call a
meeting of the shareholders, the board of directors or the
executive committee. In particular, the right to call the
shareholders’ meeting may be exercised by at least two
members of the board, whereas the right to call other meetings
may be exercised individually by each statutory auditor. The
statutory auditors may also (i) ask the directors for
information on the management of the Company and its
subsidiaries, or direct the same information requests to the
subsidiaries’ management or control bodies, (ii) carry
out inspections and verifications at the Company and
(iii) exchange information with the Company’s external
auditors. The board of directors must report to the statutory
auditors at least quarterly on its activities and on the main
transactions carried out by the Company and its subsidiaries.
Enel’s board of statutory auditors may convene a
shareholders’ meeting if it detects serious irregularities
during its review activities and there is an urgent need to take
action. Any shareholder may submit a complaint to the board of
statutory auditors regarding facts that such shareholder
believes should be subject to scrutiny by the board of statutory
auditors, which must take any complaint into account in its
report to the shareholders’ meeting. If shareholders
collectively representing 2% of the Company’s share capital
submit such a complaint, the board of statutory auditors must
promptly undertake an investigation and present its findings and
any recommendations to a shareholders’ meeting (which it
shall convene if the complaint concerns serious irregularities
and there is an urgent need to take action). The board of
statutory auditors may report to the competent court serious
breaches of the duties of the directors which may be prejudicial
to the Company or to its subsidiaries. The Company’s board
of statutory auditors is also required to notify CONSOB without
delay of any irregularities found during its review activities.
CONSOB may report to the competent court serious breaches of the
duties of the statutory auditors of a listed company.
External Auditors
The TUF requires Italian companies whose shares are listed on
regulated markets of EU member states to appoint a firm of
external auditors that shall verify (i) during the fiscal
year, that the company’s accounting records are correctly
kept and accurately reflect the company’s activities, and
(ii) that the financial statements correspond to the
accounting records and the verifications conducted by the
external auditors and comply with applicable rules. The external
auditors express their opinion on the financial statements in a
report that may be consulted by the shareholders prior to the
annual shareholders’ meeting.
The external auditors are appointed by a resolution taken at the
annual shareholders’ meeting. Before the enactment of the
Investor Protection Act (which occurred on January 12,2006), the external auditors were appointed for a three-year
term (which could not be renewed more than twice). Under the new
statutory provisions, the external auditors are appointed for a
six-year term, which may be renewed once provided that the lead
partner is replaced. Thereafter, the same audit firm may be
re-appointed only after a three-year period has elapsed. Such
appointment must be notified to CONSOB, which, within
20 days from the notification, may bar the audit firm from
acting as external auditors in the case of existing conflicts of
interest or when the external auditors are considered
technically incompetent.
In May 2002, KPMG S.p.A., with registered offices at Via Vittor
Pisani 25, Milan, was appointed as Enel’s external
auditor for a three-year period. At the annual meeting held on
May 26, 2005, Enel’s shareholders reappointed KPMG
S.p.A. as Enel’s external auditor for a further three-year
period.
Meetings of Shareholders
Shareholders are entitled to attend and vote at ordinary and
extraordinary shareholders’ meetings. Votes may be cast
personally or by proxy. Shareholders’ meetings may be
called by Enel’s board of directors (or the board of
statutory auditors) and must be called if requested by holders
of at least 10% of the issued shares. Shareholders are not
entitled to request that a meeting of shareholders be convened
to resolve upon matters which by law are to be resolved on the
basis of a proposal, plan or report by Enel’s board of
directors. If a shareholders’ meeting is not called when
requested by shareholders and such refusal is unjustified, the
competent court may call the meeting. Shareholders who,
separately or jointly, represent at least 2.5% of the share
capital may request additions to the agenda, within five days of
the publication of the notice convening the meeting.
Shareholders are informed of all shareholders’ meetings to
be held by publication of a notice in the Official Journal of
the Italian Republic (Gazzetta Ufficiale) at least
30 days before the date fixed for the meeting (20 days
if the meeting is called at the request of holders of at least
10% of the issued shares). The above formalities and terms
regarding the call notice may be reduced in other very limited
circumstances. As a matter of practice, the Company publishes
this notice in at least two national daily newspapers, as
recommended by CONSOB.
Shareholders’ meetings must be convened at least once a
year. Enel’s annual unconsolidated financial statements are
prepared by its board of directors and submitted for approval to
the ordinary shareholders’ meeting, which must be convened
within 120 days after the end of the fiscal year to which
such financial statements relate. This term may be extended to
up to 180 days after the end of the fiscal year, bound by
law to draw up consolidated financial statements or if
particular circumstances concerning Enel’s structure or
purposes so require. At ordinary shareholders’ meetings,
shareholders also appoint the external auditors, approve the
distribution of dividends, appoint the board of directors and
the board of statutory auditors, determine their remuneration
and vote on any other matter the resolution of which is
entrusted to them by law.
Extraordinary shareholders’ meetings may be called to vote
upon dissolutions, appointment of receivers and similar
extraordinary actions. Extraordinary shareholders’ meetings
may also be called to resolve upon proposed amendments to the
by-laws, issuance of convertible debentures or mergers and
de-mergers, capital increases and reductions, where such
resolutions may not be taken by Enel’s board of directors.
In particular, the board of directors may resolve upon the
issuance of shares or convertible debentures only if such powers
have been previously delegated to it by the extraordinary
shareholders’ meeting. Please see also
“— Board of Directors.”
The notice of a shareholders’ meeting may specify up to
three meeting dates for an ordinary or extraordinary
shareholders’ meeting; such meeting dates are generally
referred to as “calls”.
The quorum required for shareholder action at an ordinary
shareholders’ meeting on first call is at least 50% of the
total number of issued shares, while on second or third call
there is no quorum requirement. In all cases, resolutions may be
approved by holders of the majority of the shares present or
represented at the meeting. The quorum required at an
extraordinary shareholders’ meeting on first, second and
third call is at least 50%, more than one-third and at least
one-fifth, respectively, of Enel’s issued shares.
Resolutions of any extraordinary shareholders’ meeting
require the approval of at least two-thirds of the holders of
shares present or represented at such meeting.
Shareholders’ meetings may be attended only by shareholders
with voting rights, whose financial intermediary shall have
delivered to Enel, at least two days prior to the date set for
the relevant meeting, a notice entitling the shareholder to
attend the meeting. Once the above notice is communicated to
Enel by the relevant intermediary, if the shareholder disposes
of the shares, he loses the right to attend the meeting.
Shareholders may attend the shareholders’ meeting by proxy.
A proxy may be given only for a single shareholders’
meeting (including, however, the first, second and third calls
of such meeting), except as part of a general power of attorney
or a power of attorney granted by a corporation, association,
foundation or any other legal entity to one of its employees. A
proxy may be exercised only by the person expressly named in the
applicable form. The person exercising the proxy cannot be a
subsidiary, director, statutory auditor or employee of Enel or
of any of its subsidiaries. Proxies may be solicited by an
intermediary (banks or investment companies, asset management
companies and companies having proxy solicitation as their sole
purpose) on behalf of a qualified soliciting shareholder (a
shareholder who owns and has owned at least 0.5% of Enel’s
voting capital for at least six months and who has been
registered with Enel as holder of such shares for the same
period of time). Proxies may also be collected by a
shareholders’ association from among its members, subject
to certain conditions. Please see “— Voting
Rights.” CONSOB has established provisions which govern the
transparency and proper performance of the solicitation and
collection of proxies.
Preemptive Rights
Pursuant to Italian law, holders of shares are entitled to
subscribe for new issuances of shares, debentures convertible
into shares and any other warrants, rights or options entitling
the holders to subscribe for shares in proportion to their
holdings, unless such issues are for non-cash consideration or
preemptive rights are waived or limited by a resolution adopted
at an extraordinary shareholders’ meeting by holders of a
majority of the issued shares. There can be no assurance that
the owners of ADSs will be able to exercise fully any preemptive
rights to which the holders of shares are entitled.
Reports to Shareholders
The Company is required by Italian regulation to publish audited
annual consolidated and unconsolidated financial statements in
the Italian language. The Company also publishes an annual
report in English, which contains the Company’s annual
audited consolidated financial statements. The Company is also
required by CONSOB regulations to produce semi-annual and
quarterly reports to shareholders in the Italian language
containing a directors’ report and unaudited consolidated
semi-annual and quarterly condensed financial statements,
respectively (and, in the case of its semi-annual statements
only, unconsolidated financial statements as well). The Company
must also prepare annual reports on
Form 20-F to be
filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
containing, among other things, the Company’s audited
annual consolidated financial statements.
For fiscal years through and including the year ended
December 31, 2004, the Company prepared all of its
financial statements in accordance with Italian GAAP. Since
January 1, 2005, the Company publishes annual audited
consolidated financial statements and unaudited semi-annual and
quarterly reports in conformity with IFRS. The Company published
its unconsolidated financial statements for the year 2005 in
accordance with Italian GAAP, whereas as of January 1,2006, it will publish its unconsolidated financial statements in
accordance with IFRS.
Liquidation Rights
Pursuant to Italian law and subject to the satisfaction of the
claims of all creditors, holders of ordinary shares are entitled
to a distribution in liquidation that is equal to the value of
their shares (to the extent available out of the net assets of
the company).
The Company is permitted to purchase its own shares, subject to
its having received necessary authorization from the ordinary
shareholders’ meeting and to certain other conditions and
limitations provided by Italian law.
Shares may be purchased only out of profits available for
dividends or out of distributable reserves, in each case as
appearing on the latest shareholder-approved financial
statements. In addition, Enel may only repurchase fully paid-in
shares. The number of shares to be acquired, together with any
shares previously acquired by Enel or any of its subsidiaries
may not (except in limited circumstances) exceed in the
aggregate 10% of the total number of Enel’s shares then
issued and the aggregate purchase price of such shares may not
exceed the amount specifically approved by Enel’s
shareholders. Shares held in excess of such 10% limit must be
sold within one year of the date of purchase. Similar
limitations apply with respect to purchases of Enel’s
shares carried out by Group subsidiaries.
A corresponding reserve equal to the purchase price of the own
shares must be created in the balance sheet, and such reserve is
not available for distribution unless such shares are sold or
canceled. Shares purchased and held by Enel may be resold only
pursuant to a resolution of Enel’s shareholders adopted at
an ordinary shareholders’ meeting. The voting rights
attaching to the shares held by Enel or its subsidiaries cannot
be exercised, but the shares must be counted for quorum purposes
at shareholders’ meetings. Dividends and other rights,
including pre-emptive rights, attaching to such shares will
accrue to the benefit of other shareholders.
The TUF requires that the purchase by a listed company of its
own shares and the purchase of shares of a listed company by its
subsidiaries pursuant to the Italian Civil Code be carried out
so as to ensure equal treatment of the shareholders, in
accordance with procedures established by CONSOB. Subject to
certain limitations, the foregoing does not apply to shares
being purchased by a company from its employees or from the
employees of its controlling company or subsidiaries.
Under CONSOB regulations, a listed company can purchase its own
shares through: (i) tender offers; (ii) purchases on
regulated markets in accordance with procedures that do not
allow for the predetermination of which sell order will match a
buy order; (iii) the purchase and sale of derivative
instruments traded on regulated markets that provide for the
delivery of the underlying shares, provided that market rules
lay down methods for the purchase and sale of such instruments
that do not permit the direct matching of buy orders with
predetermined sell orders and ensure the easy participation of
investors in the trading of such derivative instruments used for
buybacks; and (iv) the granting to existing shareholders of
certain put options with respect to the shares they hold.
At the date hereof, Enel does not own, directly or indirectly,
any of its shares and is not currently authorized by its
shareholders to make such purchases.
Notification of the Acquisition of Shares and Voting
Rights
Pursuant to Italian securities laws, including the TUF and
implementing CONSOB regulations, any acquisition of any interest
in excess of 2% in the voting shares of a company listed on an
Italian regulated market must be notified to CONSOB and the
company whose shares are acquired. The voting rights
attributable to the shares in respect of which such notification
has not been made may not be exercised. Any resolution taken in
violation of the foregoing may be annulled if the resolution
would not have been adopted in the absence of such votes.
In addition, any person whose aggregate interest in the voting
shares of a listed company exceeds or falls below 2%, 5%, 7.5%,
10% and successive percentages being multiples of five,
respectively, of the listed company’s voting share capital,
is obliged to notify CONSOB and the issuer. For the purpose of
calculating these ownership thresholds, shares owned by any
person, irrespective of whether the voting rights attributable
thereto are exercisable by such person or by a third party, are
taken into consideration and, except in certain circumstances,
account must also be taken of shares held through, or shares the
voting rights of which are exercisable by, subsidiaries,
fiduciaries or intermediaries. For the purpose of calculating
the ownership thresholds of 5%, 10%, 25%, 50% and 75%, shares
which: (i) a person has an option to, directly or
indirectly, acquire or sell; and (ii) a person may acquire
further to the exercise of a warrant or conversion right which
is exercisable within 60 days, must also be taken into
account. The notification must be repeated when such person,
upon the exercise of the right referred to in (i) or
(ii) above, acquires or sells shares which cause his
aggregate ownership in the listed company to exceed or fall
below the relevant thresholds. Notification must be made (except
in certain circumstances) within five trading days of the event
which gives rise to the notification obligation.
Cross-ownership of listed companies may not exceed 2% of their
respective voting shares, and cross-ownership between a listed
company and an unlisted company may not exceed 2% of the voting
shares of the listed company and 10% of the voting shares of the
unlisted company. If the relative threshold is exceeded, the
company which is the latter to exceed such threshold may not
exercise the voting rights attributable to the shares in excess
of the threshold and must sell the excess shares within a period
of 12 months. If the company does not sell the excess
shares, it may not exercise the voting rights in respect of its
entire shareholding. If it is not possible to ascertain which is
the latter company to exceed the threshold, the limitation on
voting rights and the obligation to sell the excess shares
applies to both of the companies concerned, subject to an
agreement to the contrary between the two companies. The 2%
limit for cross-ownership in listed companies is increased to 5%
on the condition that such limit is exceeded by the two
companies concerned only following an agreement authorized in
advance by an ordinary shareholders’ meeting of each of
them. Furthermore, if a party holds an interest in excess of 2%
of a listed company’s share capital, such listed company or
the party which controls the listed company may not purchase an
interest above 2% in a listed company controlled by the first
party. In case of non-compliance, voting rights attributable to
the shares held in excess may not be exercised. If it is not
possible to ascertain which is the latter party to exceed the
limit, the limitation on voting rights applies to both, subject
to any different agreement between the two parties. Any
shareholders’ resolution approved in violation of the
limitation on voting rights may be annulled if the resolution
would not have been adopted in the absence of such votes. The
foregoing provisions in relation to cross ownership do not apply
when the thresholds are exceeded following a public tender offer
aimed at acquiring at least 60% of a company’s ordinary
shares or when a controlled company purchases shares of a
controlling company within the limits set forth in
Article 2359 bis of the Italian civil code and
following the procedures described under
“— Purchase by the Company of its Own
Shares”; however, certain restrictions on the manner of
purchase apply.
Pursuant to the TUF, agreements among shareholders of a listed
company or of its parent company regarding the exercise of
voting rights must be notified to CONSOB within five days,
published in summary form in the press within 10 days and
filed with the Chamber of Commerce within 15 days. Failure
to comply with the above rules renders the agreements null and
void and the shares cannot be voted. These rules apply also to
shareholders’ agreements which:
(i) concern prior consultation for the exercise of voting
rights in a listed company or its controlling company;
(ii) contain limitations on the transfer of shares or
securities which grant the right to purchase or subscribe shares
of the companies mentioned in (i) above;
(iii) provide for the purchase of shares or securities
mentioned in (ii) above; or
(iv) have as their object or effect the exercise (including
joint exercise) of a dominant influence over a listed company or
its controlling company.
Any shareholders’ agreement of the nature described above
may have a maximum term of three years or, if executed for an
unlimited term, can be terminated by a party upon six
months’ prior notice. In case of a public tender offer,
shareholders who intend to participate in the tender offer may
withdraw from the agreement without notice, such withdrawal
being effective only in the event that the relevant shares are
actually sold.
CONSOB regulations specify the method and content of the
notification and publication of the agreements as well as of
subsequent amendments thereto. The regulations also provide that
any party to an agreement regarding the exercise of voting
rights or referred to in (i) and (iv) above concerning
more than 5% of the listed company’s share capital is
obliged to notify CONSOB and the listed company in question of
its overall shareholding in the listed company, unless such
information has already been notified in compliance with other
provisions of the TUF.
In accordance with Italian antitrust laws, the Antitrust
Authority may prohibit any acquisition of control in a company
which would create or strengthen a dominant position in the
domestic market or a significant part thereof and result in the
elimination or substantial reduction, on a lasting basis, of
competition, provided that certain turnover thresholds are
exceeded. However, if the turnover of the acquiring party and
the company to be
acquired exceed certain higher turnover thresholds, the
antitrust review of the acquisition falls within the exclusive
jurisdiction of the European Commission.
Minority Shareholders’ Rights
Shareholders’ resolutions which are not adopted in
conformity with applicable law or Enel’s by-laws may be
challenged (with certain limitations and exceptions) within
90 days by absent, dissenting or abstaining shareholders
representing individually or in the aggregate at least 0.1% of
Enel’s share capital (as well as by the Company’s
board of directors or board of statutory auditors). Shareholders
not reaching this threshold or shareholders not entitled to vote
at Enel’s meetings may only claim damages deriving from the
resolution, unless otherwise provided by Enel’s by-laws.
Enel’s by-laws currently do not contain any such provision.
Dissenting, abstaining or absent shareholders may require Enel
to buy back their shares for the average closing price of the
previous six months as a result of shareholders’
resolutions approving, among other things, material
modifications of the company’s corporate purpose or of the
voting rights of the Company’s shares, the transformation
of the Company from a stock corporation into a different legal
entity, the transfer of Enel’s registered seat outside
Italy or the de-listing of Enel’s shares from Telematico.
Any shareholder may bring to the attention of the board of
statutory auditors facts or acts which are deemed wrongful. If
such shareholders represent more than 2% of Enel’s share
capital, the board of statutory auditors must investigate
without delay and report its findings and recommendations to the
shareholders’ meeting.
Shareholders representing at least 5% of Enel’s share
capital have the right to report to the competent court serious
breaches of the duties of the directors which may be prejudicial
to the Company or to its subsidiaries. In addition, shareholders
representing at least 2.5% of Enel’s share capital may
commence derivative suits before the competent court against the
Company’s directors, statutory auditors and general
managers. Enel may waive or settle the suit unless shareholders
holding at least 5% of the shares vote against such waiver or
settlement. Enel will reimburse the legal costs of such action
in the event that the claim of such shareholders is successful
and the court does not award such costs against the relevant
directors, statutory auditors or general managers.
Under Italian law, the by-laws of privatized companies that
impose a maximum limit on the number of shares that may be held
by any shareholder must provide for the election of directors
and statutory auditors through the voting list system provided
under the privatization law to ensure that minority shareholders
of a company are represented on its board of directors and board
of statutory auditors. Accordingly, Enel’s by-laws require
that the board of directors, except for the non-voting director,
if any, appointed by the MEF (please see
“— Special Powers of the MEF”), and the
board of statutory auditors be elected on the basis of candidate
lists presented by one or more shareholders, including the MEF,
representing in the aggregate at least 1% of Enel’s share
capital having the right to vote at ordinary shareholders’
meetings; the outgoing board of directors may present a
candidate list for the election of the new board of directors.
As a general rule, the Investor Protection Act requires that
candidate lists for listed companies be presented for the
appointment of the board of directors, and that at least one
director be appointed by minority shareholders. All directors
must possess the requisites of good standing set forth for the
statutory auditors by a decree issued by the Ministry of
Justice; moreover, if the board of directors is composed by more
than seven members, at least one of them must possess the
requisites of independence set forth for statutory auditors by
the TUF.
The candidate lists must be deposited at Enel’s registered
office and published in at least three Italian newspapers with
nationwide circulation, two of which must be daily business
newspapers. Publication of the candidate list presented by the
outgoing board of directors must occur at least 20 days
before the first call of the shareholders’ meeting, the
term being reduced at 10 days in the case of candidate
lists proposed by shareholders. Each shareholder may present or
join in the presentation of only one candidate list and each
candidate may appear on only one list.
Under Enel’s by-laws, the election of the board of
directors (other than the non-voting director, if any, appointed
by the MEF through the exercise of its special powers) will
proceed as follows: seven-tenths of the members to be elected,
rounded off in the event of a fractional number to the next
lower number, will be drawn from the candidate list that
receives the majority of votes cast by the shareholders in the
numerical order in which
they appear on the list; the remaining board members will be
drawn from the other candidate lists; for this purpose, the
votes obtained by each such list will be divided by one, two,
three and so forth up to the number of directors to be elected.
The numbers obtained through this process are attributed to the
candidates of each list in the order in which such candidates
rank in the list. The candidates of the various lists are ranked
in a single ranking and in decreasing order on the basis of the
numbers attributed to each of them. The candidates with the
highest numbers are elected. Following the reforms introduced by
the Investor Protection Act, the appointment of the members of
the board of directors shall be by secret vote.
The election of the board of statutory auditors is governed by
the same rules applicable to the election of the board of
directors, except that the latter may not present a candidate
list for the board of statutory auditors. Enel’s current
by-laws provide that the board of statutory auditors consists of
three auditors, of which minority shareholders have the right to
appoint one, and two alternate auditors, of which minority
shareholders have the right to appoint one. Pursuant to the
Investor Protection Act, the chairman of the board of statutory
auditors will be elected by the shareholders’ meeting
between the members appointed by minority shareholders, such
provision being applicable for the elections held after
January 12, 2006. Application of the secret vote provided
for by the Investor Protection Act to the election of the board
of statutory auditors is currently a matter of debate.
Tender Offer Rules
Pursuant to the TUF, a public tender offer must be made by any
person that, by reason of its purchases of shares, holds more
than 30% of the shares of an Italian company listed on an
Italian regulated market entitling their holders to vote on the
election or revocation of the directors or the commencement of
derivative suits against them (for purposes of this section, and
as applicable to Enel’s shares, the “Ordinary
Shares”). The tender offer must cover all the Ordinary
Shares of the listed company. Similarly, a tender offer for all
the Ordinary Shares of a listed company must be made by any
person who, having more than 30% of the Ordinary Shares without
exercising majority voting rights at ordinary shareholders’
meetings, acquires — by way of acquisition or exercise
of subscription or conversion rights — during a
12-month period more
than an additional 3% of the Ordinary Shares. Moreover,
according to releases issued by CONSOB if, as a result of a
share buy-back effected by a listed company, the controlling
shareholder of that company holds more than 30% of the
outstanding Ordinary Shares (i.e., exclusive of treasury stock),
the obligation to launch a tender offer is triggered. The offer
must be launched within thirty days from the date on which the
relevant threshold was exceeded, at a price not lower than the
average of the weighted average of the market price for the
Ordinary Shares in the previous twelve months, and the highest
price paid for the same Ordinary Shares by the offeror in the
same period.
Under Regulation No. 11971, a purchaser is exempted
from the tender offer obligation when: (i) the
purchaser’s equity interest, as a result of an acquisition,
does not exceed the 30% threshold by more than 3% (provided that
the purchaser commits (a) not to exercise the voting rights
pertaining to any Ordinary Shares exceeding the 30% threshold
and (b) to sell the Ordinary Shares exceeding the 30%
threshold within 12 months from the date of purchase),
(ii) another person (or several persons acting jointly)
already owns more than 50% of the outstanding Ordinary Shares,
(iii) the 30% threshold is exceeded as a result of a
capital increase in connection with a debt restructuring plan
approved by CONSOB, (iv) the 30% threshold is exceeded as a
result of transfers of Ordinary Shares among related persons,
(v) the 30% threshold is exceeded as a result of the
exercise of pre-emptive rights, (vi) the 30% threshold is
exceeded through mergers or demergers having an industrial
purpose, approved by the shareholders of the company whose
shares would otherwise be the target of the tender offer. The
TUF provides further that the acquisition of an interest above
30% of the Ordinary Shares of a company does not trigger the
obligation to launch a 100% tender offer if the person concerned
has exceeded the threshold as a result of a public tender offer
launched on all of the Ordinary Shares of the company. If a
person exceeds the above 30% threshold as a result of a public
tender offer launched on 60% or more, but on less than all, of
the Ordinary Shares of the company, the person concerned is
exempted from the obligation to launch a 100% tender offer if
(i) the tender offer has been approved by shareholders of
the company holding a majority of the Ordinary Shares (excluding
the offeror and the current majority shareholder), and
(ii) the offeror (its subsidiaries, controlling person,
related companies and other person connected to it by virtue,
inter alia, of shareholders’ agreements) has not
acquired more than 1% of the Ordinary Shares of the company in
the preceding 12 months; CONSOB shall ensure compliance
with these conditions before allowing the offer to be launched.
After such an offer has been
completed, the offeror nevertheless becomes subject to the duty
to launch an offer for 100% of the Ordinary Shares if, in the
course of the subsequent 12 months, (i) it (or its
affiliates) purchases more than an additional 1% of the Ordinary
Shares of the company, or (ii) if the company approves a
merger or split-up.
Finally, the TUF provides that anyone holding 90% or more of the
voting shares of a listed company must launch an offer for the
remaining voting shares unless an adequate distribution is
restored so as to ensure proper trading within a period of
120 days. Any shareholder holding more than 98% of the
voting shares of a listed company following a tender offer for
all such shares issued by the company, has the right to obtain
title to the remaining shares within four months after the end
of the tender offer if it has stated in the offer document its
intention to make such an acquisition at a price set by a
court-appointed expert.
Under Italian law, companies and other entities that, acting in
their own interest or the interest of third parties, mismanage a
company subject to their direction and coordination powers are
liable to such company’s shareholders and creditors for
ensuing damages. This liability is excluded if (i) the
ensuing damage is fully eliminated, including through subsequent
transactions, or (ii) the damage is effectively offset by
the global benefits deriving in general to the company from the
continuing exercise of such direction and coordination powers.
Direction and coordination powers are presumed to exist, among
other things, with respect to consolidated subsidiaries.
Significant Differences in Corporate Governance Practices for
Purposes of
Section 303A.11 of the NYSE Listed Company Manual
Overview
Corporate governance rules for Italian stock corporations
(societą per azioni) like Enel whose shares are
listed on the Italian stock exchange are set forth in the
Italian civil code, in the TUF (as amended by the Investor
Protection Act) and in the corporate governance rules set forth
by the voluntary code of corporate governance issued by Borsa
Italiana (the “Corporate Governance Code”), the
provisions of which were updated in March 2006 (listed companies
being asked to comply with such updated provisions by the end of
fiscal year 2006). As described in more detail below, Italian
corporate governance rules differ in a number of ways from those
applicable to U.S. domestic companies under NYSE listing
standards, as set forth in the NYSE Listed Company Manual.
As a general rule, Enel’s main corporate bodies are
governed by the Italian civil code and the TUF and are granted
specific powers and duties that are legally binding and from
which there can be no derogation. The Corporate Governance Code
builds on the general framework provided for by the Italian
civil code and the TUF and sets forth recommendations for
responsible corporate governance intended to reflect generally
accepted best practice. Listed companies are requested to issue
an annual compliance report disclosing information on their
adoption of the Corporate Governance Code and the compliance
with its provisions, indicating which recommendations, if any,
are not being followed and the reasons for any failure to comply
with such recommendations. The annual compliance report must
also contain a general description of Enel’s corporate
governance system. As stated in the Company’s annual
compliance report issued in March 2006, Enel is substantially in
compliance with the recommendations set forth in the Corporate
Governance Code.
Enel follows the traditional system of Italian corporate
governance, which provides for two main corporate governing
bodies — the board of directors and the board of
statutory auditors. This system contrasts with the unitary
system envisaged for U.S. domestic companies by the NYSE
listing standards, which contemplate the board of
directors’ serving as the sole governing body. Please see
“— By-laws — Board of Directors”
and “— By-laws — Statutory
Auditors” above for a description of the powers and duties
of the Company’s board of directors and board of statutory
auditors, respectively. The two boards are separate and no
individual may be a member of both boards. Both the members of
the board of directors and the members of the board of statutory
auditors owe duties of loyalty and care to us.
As required by Italian law, a firm of external auditors is in
charge of auditing Enel’s financial statements. The members
of Enel’s board of directors and board of statutory
auditors, as well as Enel’s external auditors, are directly
and separately appointed by the shareholders at a general
meeting.
As recommended by the Corporate Governance Code, moreover,
Enel’s board of directors also established an internal
control committee which is mainly responsible for assessing the
adequacy of our internal control system and the proper
application of accounting standards and for relations with
external auditors; such committee essentially advises, assists
and makes proposals to the Company’s board of directors
with respect to all such matters. The four current members of
Enel’s internal control committee are non-executive
directors and qualify as independent under the rules of the
Corporate Governance Code applicable for the year 2005. Please
see “Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and
Employees — Directors.” However, as explained in
more detail below, this committee does not serve as Enel’s
“audit committee” for purposes of Rule 10A-3
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
“Exchange Act”) or NYSE listing standards.
The Company has set out in the following summary the significant
differences between Italian corporate governance rules and
practices as Enel has implemented them and those applicable to
U.S. issuers under NYSE listing standards, as set forth in
the NYSE Listed Company Manual.
Independent Directors
NYSE domestic company standards. The NYSE listing
standards applicable to U.S. companies provide that
“independent” directors must comprise a majority of
the board. In order for a director to be considered
“independent,” the board of directors must
affirmatively determine that the director has no
“material” direct or indirect relationship with the
company. These relationships “can include commercial,
industrial, banking, consulting, legal, accounting, charitable
and familial relationships, among others.” More
specifically, a director is not independent if such director or
a member of his/her immediate family has certain specified
relationships with the company, its parent, any consolidated
subsidiary, its internal or external auditors, or any company
that has significant business relationships with the company,
its parent or any consolidated subsidiary. Ownership of a
significant amount of stock, by itself, is not a bar to
independence. In addition, a three-year period following the
termination of any relationship that compromised a
director’s independence must lapse before that director can
again be considered independent.
Enel’s practice. In Italy, the TUF (as amended by
the Investor Protection Act) provides that when, as this is the
case, the board of directors has more than seven members, at
least one of them must satisfy the independence requirements
established for the statutory auditors set forth below and, if
provided for in the bylaws, the additional requirements
established in the Corporate Governance Code.
The Corporate Governance Code recommends that an adequate number
of non-executive directors (i.e., directors who are not members
of our senior management nor vested by the board with specific
managerial tasks) shall be independent, in the sense that they
do not maintain, nor have recently maintained, directly or
indirectly, any business relationships with the issuer or
persons linked to the issuer, of such significance as to
influence their present autonomous judgement. Moreover, the
board of directors shall periodically assess the directors’
independence and the results of the assessments of the board
shall be communicated to the market.
Directors’ independence is assessed on the basis of a few
general principles, rather than detailed rules, having regard
more to substance rather than form. Under the provisions of the
Corporate Governance Code updated in March 2006, a director is
usually considered not independent in the following cases, which
are given only as indicative examples: (i) if he/she
controls, directly or indirectly, the issuer also through
subsidiaries, trustees or through a third party, or is able to
exercise over the issuer dominant influence, or participates in
a shareholders’ agreement through which one or more persons
may exercise control or considerable influence over the issuer;
(ii) if he/she is, or has been in the preceding three
fiscal years, a significant representative of the issuer, of a
subsidiary having strategic relevance or of a company under
common control with the issuer, or of a company or entity
controlling the issuer or able to exercise over the same a
considerable influence, also jointly with others through a
shareholders’ agreement; (iii) if he/she has, or had
in the preceding fiscal year, directly or indirectly (e.g.
through subsidiaries or companies of which he/she is a
significant representative, or in the capacity as partner of a
professional firm or of a consulting company) a significant
commercial, financial or
professional relationship (x) with the issuer, one of its
subsidiaries, or any of its significant representatives,
(y) with a subject who, also jointly with others through a
shareholders’ agreement, controls the issuer,
or — in case of a company or an entity —
(z) with the relevant significant representatives; or is,
or has been in the preceding three fiscal years, an employee of
the above-mentioned subjects; (iv) if he/she receives, or
has received (including through participation in incentive plans
or stock option plans linked to the company’s performance)
in the preceding three fiscal years, from the issuer or a
subsidiary or a company controlling the issuer, a significant
additional remuneration compared to the “fixed”
remuneration of non-executive director of the issuer;
(v) if he/she was a director of the issuer for more than
nine years in the last twelve years; (vi) if he/she is an
executive director in another company in which an executive
director of the issuer holds the office of director;
(vii) if he/she is shareholder or quotaholder or director
of a legal entity belonging to the same network as the external
auditor of the issuer; (viii) if he/she is a close relative
of a person who is in any of the positions listed in the above
paragraphs.
The board of directors shall evaluate, at least once a year, on
the basis of the information provided by each director or
otherwise available to the issuer, those relations which could
be or appear to be such as to jeopardize the autonomy of
judgment of such director. The board of statutory auditors shall
ascertain the correct application of the assessment criteria and
procedures adopted by the board of directors for evaluating the
independence of its members. The result of such controls is
notified to the market in the report on corporate governance or
in the report of the board of statutory auditors to the
shareholders’ meeting. As of the date hereof, Enel’s
board of directors consists of nine members, eight of whom are
non-executive directors who qualify as independent
(i) under the criteria of the Corporate Governance Code
applicable for the year 2005 (which differ in certain aspects
with respect to the provisions mentioned above), and
(ii) under the independence requirements established for
the statutory auditors set forth below, as stated by the board
of directors in March 2006.
In addition, the members of Enel’s board of statutory
auditors must meet independence requirements mandated by Italian
law. As with directors, statutory auditors’ independence is
assessed on the basis of a few general principles, rather than
detailed rules. In particular, a person who (i) is a
director, or the spouse or a close relative of a director, of
the Company or any of its affiliates; (ii) has an
employment or consulting or similar relationship with the
Company or any of its affiliates; or (iii) has an economic
or professional relationship with Enel or any of its affiliates
which might compromise his/her independence, cannot be appointed
to the Company’s board of statutory auditors. Although
there is no formal cooling-off requirement, statutory auditors
who are registered chartered accountants and have had a regular
or material consulting relationship with Enel or its affiliates
within two years prior to the appointment, or have been employed
by, or served as directors of, Enel or its affiliates, within
three years prior to the appointment, may be suspended or
cancelled from the register of chartered public accountants.
Finally, Enel is required to provide in its bylaws a mechanism
to permit stockholders to propose alternative lists of
candidates for the board of statutory auditors. Please see
“Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and
Employees — Board of Statutory Auditors” and
“— By-Laws — Minority
Shareholders’ Rights.”
Executive Sessions
NYSE domestic company standards. In order to empower
non-management directors of U.S. companies listed on the
NYSE to serve as a more effective check on management,
non-management directors must meet regularly in executive
sessions, and, if the board includes directors who are not
independent, the independent directors should meet alone in an
executive session at least once a year.
Enel’s practice. In Italy, neither non-executive
directors nor independent directors are required to meet in
executive sessions. Under the provisions of the Corporate
Governance Code updated in March 2006, it is recommended that
independent directors meet separately from other directors at
least once a year. The members of Enel’s board of statutory
auditors are required to meet at least once every 90 days.
Audit Committee and Internal Audit Function
NYSE domestic company standards. U.S. companies
listed on the NYSE are required to establish an audit committee
that satisfies the requirements of Rule 10A-3 under the
Exchange Act and certain additional
requirements set by the NYSE. In particular, all members of this
committee must be independent and the committee must adopt a
written charter. The committee’s prescribed
responsibilities include (i) the appointment, compensation,
retention and oversight of the external auditors;
(ii) establishing procedures for the handling of
“whistleblower” complaints; (iii) discussion of
financial reporting and internal control issues and critical
accounting policies (including through executive sessions with
the external auditors); (iv) the approval of audit and
non-audit services performed by the external auditors; and
(v) the adoption of an annual performance evaluation. Each
company must also have an internal audit function, which may be
out-sourced, except to its independent auditor.
Enel’s practice. Rule 10A-3 under the Exchange
Act provides an exemption from certain of the audit committee
requirements under the rule for foreign private issuers with a
board of statutory auditors established in accordance with local
law or listing requirements and meeting specified requirements
with regard to independence and responsibilities (including the
performance of most of the specific tasks assigned to audit
committees by the rule, to the extent permitted by local law)
(the “Statutory Auditor Requirements”). Enel granted
specific functions to its board of statutory auditors in order
to fulfill the Statutory Auditor Requirements and, as a result,
the Company qualifies for this exemption.
In particular, as of July 2005, the board of statutory
auditors’ responsibilities also include (i) the power
to express a binding opinion on the appointment, compensation
and removal of Enel’s external auditors, (ii) the
supervision of the external auditors’ performance and the
approval of any additional assignments (that can only be of an
accounting nature according to the Company’s policies),
(iii) the supervision of Enel’s procedures for the
submission to the internal audit function of complaints and
reports on accounting practices and internal control system,
including the supervision of the related corporate procedures
governing whistle blowing, and (iv) the possibility of
availing itself of external consultants. Enel also has an
internal audit function, which it has not outsourced, and an
internal control committee, as noted above, in accordance with
the Corporate Governance Code. Please see “Item 6.
Directors, Senior Management and Employees —
Directors.”
Compensation Committee
NYSE domestic company standards. Under NYSE standards,
the compensation of the CEO of U.S. companies listed on the
NYSE must be approved by a compensation committee (or
equivalent) composed entirely of independent directors. The
compensation committee must also make recommendations to the
board of directors with regard to the compensation of other
executive officers, incentive compensation plans and
equity-based plans that are subject to board of directors’
approval. Disclosure of individual management compensation
information for these companies is mandated by the Exchange
Act’s proxy rules, from which foreign private issuers are
generally exempt.
Enel’s practice. Compensation of the chairman of
Enel’s board of directors, its CEO and other members, if
any, of the board of directors vested with particular offices is
proposed by Enel’s compensation committee and approved by
the board of directors, after having received the opinion of the
board of statutory auditors. Senior management compensation
policies are proposed by Enel’s CEO, evaluated by the
compensation committee and approved by the board of directors.
Our equity-based compensation plans are adopted by Enel’s
board of directors upon proposal of the compensation committee
and, according to the provisions of the Investor Protection Act,
submitted to the shareholders’ meeting for approval. Please
see “— Stock Option Plans.” The Corporate
Governance Code recommends that the members of the compensation
committee shall be non-executive directors, the majority of
which shall be independent. The four current members of
Enel’s compensation committee are non-executive directors
and qualify as independent under the rules of the Corporate
Governance Code applicable for the year 2005. Please see
“Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and
Employees — Directors.”The Company discloses the
compensation of each of the members of its board of directors
(including Enel’s CEO) and its board of statutory auditors
in the annual unconsolidated financial statements prepared in
accordance with Italian GAAP, and in Item 6 of this annual
report on
Form 20-F.
NYSE domestic company standards. Under NYSE standards, a
U.S. company listed on the NYSE must have a
nominating/corporate governance committee (or equivalent)
composed entirely of independent directors that, among other
things, is responsible for nominating directors and board
committee members.
Enel’s practice. We do not have a nominating
committee since we believe that there are no impediments for
shareholders to submit their candidate lists in compliance with
the the provisions of the law, Enel’s by-laws and the
Corporate Governance Code. Directors may be nominated by any of
Enel’s shareholders or Enel’s board of directors.
Corporate Governance Guidelines/ Code of Business Conduct
and Ethics
NYSE domestic company standards. A U.S. company
listed on the NYSE must adopt corporate governance guidelines
and a code of business conduct and ethics for directors,
officers and employees. A company must also publish these items
on its website and provide printed copies on request.
Section 406 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 requires a
company to disclose whether it has adopted a code of ethics for
its principal executive officer, principal financial officer,
principal accounting officer or controller, or persons
performing similar functions, and if not, the reasons why it has
not done so. The NYSE listing standards applicable to
U.S. companies provide that codes of conduct and ethics
should address, at a minimum, conflicts of interest; corporate
opportunities; confidentiality; fair dealing; protection and
proper use of company assets; legal compliance; and encouraging
the reporting of illegal and unethical behavior. Corporate
governance guidelines must address, at a minimum,
directors’ qualification standards, responsibilities and
compensation; directors’ access to management and
independent advisers; management succession; director
orientation and continuing education; and an annual performance
evaluation of the board.
Enel’s practice. Enel has adopted certain corporate
governance guidelines (including with respect to its internal
control system, significant transactions, management and
handling of confidential information and internal dealing), a
compliance program to prevent certain criminal offenses and a
code of conduct for our directors, employees and others acting
on our behalf. As noted in Item 16B of this annual report,
Enel has also adopted a code of ethics as defined in
Section 406 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.
Enel believes that its codes of conduct and ethics address the
relevant issues contemplated by the NYSE standards applicable to
U.S. companies noted above. The Company’s corporate
governance guidelines, on the other hand, do not address all of
the issues contemplated by the NYSE domestic company
standards.
As noted above, Enel must issue an annual compliance report
describing its corporate governance system and disclosing the
level of its compliance with the recommendations of the
Corporate Governance Code. This report and all the
Company’s guidelines, programs and codes are available,
both in English and in Italian, on Enel’s website at
www.enel.it in the “Investor relations —
Corporate Governance” section. Information appearing on the
website is not incorporated by reference into this annual report.
Certifications as to Violations of NYSE Standards
NYSE domestic company standards. Under NYSE listing
standards, the chief executive officer of a U.S. company
listed on the NYSE must certify annually to the NYSE that he or
she is unaware of any violation by the company of the NYSE
corporate governance listing standards, and to disclose that
such certification has been made in the company’s annual
report to shareholders (or, if no annual report to shareholders
is prepared, its annual report on
Form 10-K). The
chief executive officer must also promptly notify the NYSE in
writing if any executive officer of the company becomes aware of
any material non-compliance with the NYSE corporate governance
listing standards. A U.S. company listed on the NYSE must
also submit an annual written affirmation to the NYSE, within
30 days of its annual shareholders’ meeting and in a
form specified by the NYSE, regarding its compliance with
applicable NYSE corporate governance standards. A
U.S. company listed on the NYSE is further required to
submit an interim written affirmation to the NYSE upon the
occurrence of specified events, including changes to the board
of directors or its audit, nominating/corporate governance or
compensation committees and changes in the status of independent
directors.
Enel’s practice. Under the NYSE rules, as of
July 31, 2005, Enel is required to submit an annual written
affirmation to the NYSE, in a form specified by the NYSE,
regarding the Company’s compliance with applicable NYSE
corporate governance standards. On August 1, 2005, Enel
submitted such affirmation. In subsequent years, Enel will be
required to submit an annual affirmation within 30 days of
the filing of its annual report on
Form 20-F with the
SEC. Following submission of the Company’s initial annual
written affirmation, Enel is also required to submit to the NYSE
an interim written affirmation, in a form specified by the NYSE,
any time Enel is no longer eligible to rely on, or chooses to no
longer rely on, a previously applicable exemption provided by
Exchange Act Rule 10A-3, or, to the extent Enel has an
audit committee as defined in Rule 10A-3, if a member of
such audit committee ceases to be deemed independent or an audit
committee member had been added. In addition, under NYSE rules,
the Company’s chief executive officer must notify the NYSE
in writing if any executive officer becomes aware of any
material non-compliance by Enel with applicable NYSE corporate
governance standards.
Shareholder Approval of Adoption and Modification of
Equity Compensation Plans
NYSE domestic company standards. Shareholders of a
U.S. company listed on the NYSE must approve the adoption
of, and any material revision to, the company’s equity
compensation plans, with certain exceptions.
Enel’s practice. Enel’s shareholders must
(i) authorize the issuance of shares in connection with
capital increases, (ii) authorize the buy-back and resale
of the Company’s own shares, and (iii) approve the
adoption of equity compensation plans made available to the
Company’s employees, directors and independent consultants.
On May 26, 2005, we entered into an agreement pursuant to
which we sold Wind to Weather in a series of transactions. For
additional details regarding the agreement, see
“Item 4. Information on the Company —
Business — The Enel Group — Discontinued
Operations — Telecommunications.”
Exchange Controls
No exchange control consent is required in Italy for the
transfer to persons outside of Italy of dividends or other
distributions with respect to, or of the proceeds from the sale
of, shares of an Italian company.
However, Italian resident and non-resident investors who
transfer, directly or indirectly (through banks or other
intermediaries) into or out of Italy, cash, investments or other
securities in excess of
€12,500 must
report all such transfers to the Italian Exchange Office
(“Ufficio Italiano Cambi” or “UIC”). In the
case of indirect transfers, banks or other intermediaries are
required to maintain records of all such transfers for five
years for inspection by Italian tax and judicial authorities.
Non-compliance with these reporting and record-keeping
requirements may result in administrative fines or, in the case
of false reporting or in certain cases of incomplete reporting,
criminal penalties. The UIC is required to maintain reports for
a period of ten years and may use such reports, directly or
through other government offices, to police money laundering,
tax evasion and any other crime or violation.
Individuals, non-profit entities and partnerships that are
residents of Italy must disclose on their annual tax returns all
investments and financial assets held outside Italy, as well as
the total amount of transfers to, from, within and between
countries other than Italy relating to such foreign investments
or financial assets, even if at the end of the taxable period
foreign investments or financial assets are no longer owned. No
such tax disclosure is required if (i) the foreign
investments or financial assets are exempt from income tax; or
(ii) the total value of the foreign investments or
financial assets at the end of the taxable period or the total
amount of the transfers effected during the fiscal year does not
exceed €12,500.
Corporate residents of Italy are exempt from these tax
disclosure requirements with respect to their annual tax returns
because this information is required to be discussed in their
financial statements.
We cannot assure you that the present regulatory environment in
or outside Italy will continue or that particular policies
presently in effect will be maintained, although Italy is
required to maintain certain regulations
and policies by virtue of its membership of the European Union
and other international organizations and its adherence to
various bilateral and multilateral international agreements.
Taxation
The following is a summary of certain United States federal and
Italian tax matters. The summary contains a description of the
principal United States federal and Italian tax consequences of
the purchase, ownership and disposition of ordinary shares or
ADSs by a holder who is a citizen or resident of the United
States or a U.S. corporation or who otherwise will be
subject to United States federal income tax on a net income
basis in respect of the ordinary shares or ADSs (a
“U.S. holder”). This summary does not purport to
be a comprehensive description of all of the tax considerations
that may be relevant to a decision to purchase ordinary shares
or ADSs. In particular, the summary deals only with beneficial
owners who will hold ordinary shares or ADSs as capital assets
and does not address the tax treatment of a beneficial owner who
owns 10% or more of Enel’s voting shares or who may be
subject to special tax rules, such as banks, tax-exempt
entities, insurance companies or dealers in securities or
currencies, or persons that will hold ordinary shares or ADSs as
a position in a “straddle” for tax purposes or as part
of a “constructive sale” or a “conversion”
transaction or other integrated investment comprised of ordinary
shares or ADSs and one or more other investments. Nor does this
summary discuss the treatment of ordinary shares or ADSs that
are held in connection with a permanent establishment through
which a non-resident beneficial owner carries on or performs
personal services in Italy.
The summary is based upon tax laws and practice of the United
States and Italy as in effect on the date of this annual report.
Prospective purchasers and current holders of ordinary shares or
ADSs are advised to consult their own tax advisors as to the
U.S., Italian or other tax consequences of the purchase,
beneficial ownership and disposition of ordinary shares or ADSs,
including, in particular, the effect of any state, local or
national tax laws.
For purposes of the summary, beneficial owners of ordinary
shares or ADSs who are considered residents of the United States
for purposes of the current income tax convention between the
United States and Italy (the “Income Tax Convention”),
and are not subject to an anti-treaty shopping provision that
applies in limited circumstances, are referred to as
“U.S. holders.” Beneficial owners who are
citizens or residents of the United States, corporations
organized under U.S. law, and U.S. partnerships,
estates or trusts (to the extent their income is subject to
U.S. tax either directly or in the hands of partners or
beneficiaries) generally will be considered to be residents of
the United States under the Income Tax Convention. Special rules
apply to U.S. holders that are also residents of Italy. A
new tax treaty to replace the current Income Tax Convention was
signed on August 25, 1999, but has not yet been ratified by
Italy. The new treaty would not change significantly the
provisions of the current Income Tax Convention that are
discussed below (except that it would clarify the availability
of benefits to certain tax-exempt organizations). These laws are
subject to change, possibly on a retroactive basis. Unless
otherwise stated, this summary assumes that a U.S. holder
is eligible for the benefits of the Income Tax Convention.
For purposes of the Income Tax Convention and the United States
Internal Revenue Code of 1986, or the Code, holders of American
Depositary Receipts evidencing ADSs will be treated as the
beneficial owners of the underlying ordinary shares represented
by those ADSs.
Withholding Tax on Dividends
Italian law provides for the withholding of income tax at a 27%
rate on dividends paid by Italian companies to shareholders who
are not residents of Italy for tax purposes. Accordingly, the
amount initially made available to the Depositary for payment to
U.S. holders will reflect withholding at the 27% rate.
Under domestic Italian law, a non-resident holder of shares of
common stock may recover up to four-ninths of the tax withheld
on dividends by presenting evidence to the Italian tax
authorities that income tax has been fully paid on the dividends
in the non-resident holder’s country of residence in an
amount at least equal to the total refund claimed. Non-resident
holders seeking such payments from the Italian tax authorities
have experienced extensive delays and incurred expenses.
Alternatively, the 27% withholding tax may be reduced pursuant
to an income tax convention between Italy and the non-resident
holder’s country of residence. Generally, a reduced 15%
withholding tax would be levied under the Income Tax Convention.
Under current Italian law, all shares of Italian listed
companies (including the ordinary shares) must be held in a
centralized clearing system authorized by CONSOB. Under
applicable tax provisions, if the ordinary shares are held
through the centralized clearing system managed by Monte Titoli
(the only such system currently authorized in Italy), no
withholding tax on dividends is applied by the Company. Instead
of the withholding tax, a substitute tax (imposta sostitutiva)
is applied on dividend distributions to non-resident holders of
ordinary shares (or ADSs relating to such ordinary shares) at a
rate equal to the withholding tax that would otherwise be due.
The substitute tax is applied by the resident or non-resident
intermediary with which the ordinary shares are deposited and
which participates in the Monte Titoli system (directly or
through a foreign centralized clearing system participating in
the Monte Titoli system). The procedures to be followed by a
non-resident holder in order for the intermediary with which the
ordinary shares are deposited to apply a reduced rate of tax
pursuant to an applicable income tax convention are as follows.
The intermediary must receive (i) a declaration of the
non-resident holder that contains certain data identifying the
non-resident holder and indicating the existence of all the
conditions necessary for the application of the relevant income
tax convention and the determination of the applicable treaty
rate of withholding and (ii) a certification by the tax
authorities of the non-resident holder’s country of
residence that the holder is a resident of that country for
purposes of the income tax convention and, as far as it is known
to such authorities, the holder has no permanent establishment
in Italy (which certificate will be effective until
March 31 of the year following submission). If the ordinary
shares are deposited with a non-resident intermediary, such
intermediary must appoint as its fiscal representative in Italy
a bank or an investment services company that is resident in
Italy, the permanent establishment in Italy of a non-resident
bank or investment services company, or a company licensed to
manage a centralized depository and clearing system, to carry
out all duties and obligations relating to the application and
administration of the substitute tax.
Since the ordinary shares underlying the ADSs will be held by
the custodian in the centralized clearing system managed by
Monte Titoli, the substitute tax regime described above will
apply to the ADSs. In order to enable eligible U.S. holders
to obtain a reduction at source or a refund of withholding tax
under the Income Tax Convention, the Company and the Depositary
have agreed to certain procedures. According to such procedures,
the Depositary will send holders of the ADSs certain
instructions before the dividend payment date specifying the
documentation required and the deadlines for submission. The
documentation generally will include the holder’s
declaration and the tax certification specified under points
(i) and (ii) in the preceding paragraph. In order to
comply with the documentation described under point
(ii) above, eligible U.S. holders must obtain a
certificate of residence from the U.S. Internal Revenue
Service (“IRS”) (Form 6166) with respect to each
dividend payment, unless a previously filed certification will
be effective on the dividend payment date, and produce it
together with a statement whereby such holder represents to be a
U.S. resident individual or corporation and not to maintain
a permanent establishment in Italy. IRS Form 6166 may be
obtained by filing a request for certification on IRS
Form 8802. (Additional information, including IRS
Form 8802, can be obtained from the IRS website at
www.irs.gov. Information appearing on the IRS website is not
incorporated by reference into this document.) The time for
processing requests for certification by the IRS normally is six
to eight weeks. Accordingly, holders requiring this
certification must submit their requests to the IRS as soon as
possible after receiving instructions from the Depositary. In
the case of ADSs held through a broker or other financial
intermediary, the required documentation must be delivered to
such financial intermediary for transmission to the Depositary.
In all other cases, eligible U.S. holders must deliver the
required documentation directly to the Depositary at least five
business days prior to the date set for the payment of dividends.
If the documentation is not provided in the time allotted, or if
the intermediary (i.e., the custodian in the case of the ADSs)
determines that the produced documentation does not satisfy the
prescribed requirements or that applicable law does not permit
it to apply directly the reduced Income Tax Convention rate, the
intermediary will withhold tax at the 27% rate on the dividends
paid with respect to ADSs, and eligible U.S. holders will
be required to claim an Income Tax Convention refund of 12% of
the dividend (representing the difference between 27% and the
15% Income Tax Convention rate) directly from the Italian tax
authorities. U.S. residents seeking refunds from the
Italian tax authorities have encountered expenses and extensive
delays.
Distributions of profits in kind will be subject to withholding
tax. In that case, prior to receiving the distribution, the
holder will be required to provide the Company with the funds to
pay the relevant withholding tax.
The gross amount of dividends (that is, the amount before
reduction for Italian withholding tax) paid to U.S. holders
will be subject to U.S. federal income taxation as dividend
income and will not be eligible for the dividends-received
deduction allowed to domestic corporations. Dividends paid in
euros will be includible in the income of U.S. holders in a
U.S. dollar amount calculated by reference to the exchange
rate in effect on the day the dividends are received by the
Depositary. Subject to certain exceptions for short-term and
hedged positions, the U.S. dollar amount of dividends
received by an individual prior to January 1, 2011 with
respect to our ordinary shares or ADSs will be subject to
taxation at a maximum rate of 15% if the dividends are
“qualified dividends.” Dividends paid on our shares or
ADSs will be treated as qualified dividends if (i) the
issuer is eligible for the benefits of a comprehensive income
tax treaty with the United States that the IRS has approved for
the purposes of the qualified dividend rules, and (ii) we
were not, in the year prior to the year in which the dividend
was paid, and are not, in the year in which the dividend is
paid, a passive foreign investment company (“PFIC”).
The Income Tax Convention has been approved for the purposes of
the qualified dividend rules. Based on our audited financial
statements and relevant market and shareholder data, we believe
that we were not treated as a PFIC for U.S. federal income
tax purposes with respect to our 2004 or 2005 taxable year. In
addition, based on our audited financial statements and our
current expectations regarding the value and nature of our
assets, the sources and nature of our income, and relevant
market and shareholder data, we do not anticipate becoming a
PFIC for our 2006 taxable year.
The U.S. Treasury has announced its intention to promulgate
rules pursuant to which holders of ADSs or ordinary shares and
intermediaries though whom such securities are held will be
permitted to rely on certifications from issuers to establish
that dividends are treated as qualified dividends. Because such
procedures have not yet been issued, it is not clear whether the
Company will be able to comply with them. Holders of ADSs and
ordinary shares should consult their own tax advisers regarding
the availability of the reduced dividend tax rate in the light
of their own particular circumstances.
If the Depositary converts the euro into dollars on the day it
receives them, U.S. holders generally must not realize
foreign currency gain or loss in respect of dividend income. A
U.S. holder who receives a treaty refund may be required to
recognize foreign currency gain or loss, which will be treated
as ordinary gain or loss, to the extent the amount of the treaty
refund (in dollars) received by the holder differs from the
dollar equivalent of the foreign currency amount of the treaty
refund on the date the dividends were received by the
Depositary. The Italian withholding tax (less any refund to
which such holder is entitled under the Income Tax Convention)
will be treated as a foreign income tax which such holders may
elect to deduct in computing their taxable income or, subject to
the limitations on foreign tax credits generally, credit against
their United States federal income tax liability. Dividends will
generally constitute foreign-source “passive income”
or “financial services income” for U.S. tax
purposes.
Foreign tax credits may not be allowed for withholding taxes
imposed in respect of certain short-term or hedged positions in
securities or in respect of arrangements in which a
U.S. owner’s expected economic profit is
insubstantial. U.S. owners should consult their own
advisers concerning the implications of these rules in light of
their particular circumstances.
Distributions of additional shares to U.S. holders with
respect to their ordinary shares or ADSs that are made as part
of a pro rata distribution to all of Enel’s shareholders
generally will not be subject to U.S. federal income tax.
Tax on capital gains
Capital gains realized by non-resident shareholders on the
disposal of a “qualified” shareholding held as a
capital asset and not in connection with a permanent
establishment through which such shareholders carry on or
perform business services in Italy are subject to Italian
personal or corporate income tax, for an amount equal to 40% of
the overall gain. Losses can be offset against taxable gains for
a corresponding amount and, if in excess, can be carried forward
up to four years. A “qualified” shareholding is
constituted by ordinary shares or ADSs
and/or rights representing more than 5% of Enel’s total
share capital or more than 2% of its share capital voting in the
ordinary shareholders meeting. A disposal of a
“qualified” shareholding occurs if in any
12-month period
immediately following the date when a shareholding meets one of
the thresholds illustrated above, the shareholder engages in
disposals of shares or ADSs that, individually or in aggregate,
constitute a “qualified” shareholding. The taxable
gain realized by a non-resident shareholder who is an individual
would be subject to progressive personal income tax rates
(currently, the marginal tax rate is equal to 43%, plus a
surcharge generally of up to 1.9%, depending on the municipality
in which such non-resident shareholder earns the highest
Italian-source income). The taxable gain realized by a
non-resident corporate shareholder would be subject to corporate
income tax, currently levied at a rate of 33%.
Generally, a capital gains tax (“CGT”), levied at a
rate of 12.5%, is imposed on gains realized upon the transfer or
sale of “non-qualified” shareholdings, whether held
within or outside Italy. A “non-qualified”
shareholding is constituted by an interest in Enel which does
not reach the thresholds described above. However, under
domestic law, an exemption applies to gains realized on the
disposal of “non-qualified” shareholdings in an
Italian company the shares of which are listed on a regulated
market, such as Enel’s shares, even when such shareholdings
are held in Italy. A statement whereby the holder declares to be
a non-Italian resident may be required in order to benefit from
this exemption.
Furthermore, pursuant to the Income Tax Convention, a
U.S. holder will not be subject to Italian tax on any
realized capital gains unless such U.S. holder has a
permanent establishment in Italy to which the ordinary shares or
ADSs are effectively connected. To this end, U.S. residents
selling ordinary shares or ADSs and claiming benefits under the
Income Tax Convention may be required to produce appropriate
documentation establishing that the above mentioned conditions
have been met. Other countries have executed income tax
conventions with Italy providing for a similar treatment of
Italian tax on capital gains. No tax on capital gains will be
imposed on the deposit or withdrawal of shares in return for
ADSs.
U.S. holders of ADSs will be subject to U.S. federal
income tax on any capital gains to the same extent as on other
gains from the disposition of stock. The net amount of long-term
capital gain recognized by an individual holder after
May 5, 2003 and before January 1, 2011 generally is
subject to taxation at a maximum rate of 15%. The net long-term
capital gain recognized by an individual holder before
May 6, 2003 generally is subject to taxation at a maximum
rate of 20%.
A non-U.S. holder
will not be subject to U.S. federal income tax on gain
realized on the sale of ordinary shares or ADSs unless
(i) such gain is effectively connected with the conduct by
the
non-U.S. holder of
a trade or business in the United States, or (ii) in the
case of gain realized by an individual
non-U.S. holder,
the
non-U.S. holder is
present in the United States for 183 days or more in the
taxable year of the sale and certain other conditions are met.
Taxation of Distributions from Capital Reserves
Special Italian tax rules apply to the distribution of capital
reserves. Under certain circumstances, such a distribution may
be considered as taxable income in the hands of the recipient
depending on the reserves of the distributing company
outstanding at the time of distribution and the actual nature of
the reserves distributed. The application of such rules may also
have an impact on the tax basis in the ordinary shares or ADSs
held and/or the characterization of any taxable income received
and the tax regime applicable to it. Non-resident shareholders
may be subject to withholding tax and CGT as a result of such
rules. You should consult your tax advisor in connection with
any distribution of capital reserves.
Transfer tax
An Italian transfer tax is normally payable on the transfer of
shares in an Italian company. The transfer tax will not be
payable with respect to any transfers of ordinary shares or ADSs
involving non-Italian residents concluded either on a regulated
market or with a bank or an investment services company.
As of October 25, 2001, the Italian estate and gift tax has
been abolished and consequently any transfer of ordinary shares
or ADSs occurring by reason of death or gift as of that date is
no longer subject to any Italian estate and gift tax.
However, should a gift of shares or ADSs for a value exceeding
€180,759.91 (the
“Threshold”) occur and the relationship between the
donor and the beneficiary not qualify for the exemption regime
applicable to gifts made in favor of certain family members
(e.g., spouse, parents, children, grandchildren), a registration
tax of €168 would
be due insofar as the gift agreement is either executed or
registered in Italy. The materiality threshold is increased to
€516,456.91 in
cases where the beneficiary is a person with a handicap
recognized pursuant to applicable law.
Documents On Display
Enel is subject to the information reporting requirements of the
Exchange Act applicable to foreign private issuers. In
accordance therewith, Enel is required to file reports and other
information with the U.S. Securities and Exchange
Commission. In particular, the Company is required to file
annual reports on
Form 20-F by
electronic means. These materials, including this annual report
on Form 20-F, are
available for inspection and copying at the U.S. Securities
and Exchange Commission’s public reference facilities in
Washington D.C., New York, New York and Chicago, Illinois.
Please call the Commission at
1-800-SEC-0330 for
further information on the public reference rooms.
ITEM 11.
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURE ABOUT MARKET RISK
Price Risk Management and Market Risk Information
We purchase electricity from countries that use currencies other
than the euro and also purchase fuel in the international oil
and natural gas markets, where prices are generally denominated
in U.S. dollars. As a consequence, we are subject to market
risks from changes in foreign exchange rates and commodity
prices. We are also directly subject to interest rate risks
related to our financial indebtedness.
The system for the reimbursement of fuel costs through tariffs
that was in place through March 31, 2004 reduced our
commodity price and exchange rate risks from fuel purchases and
imports of electricity. This structure included a reimbursement
component for fuel costs and imports that was based on, among
other things, an index to the price of a basket of fuels on
international markets (which are generally priced in
U.S. dollars). This index was adjusted so that changes in
fuel costs and exchange rate fluctuations were reflected in the
levels of reimbursements and, as a consequence, in tariffs. As a
result, our commodity price and exchange rate exposures for fuel
purchases related mainly to the time lag between our incurrence
of fuel costs and the calculation period used to determine the
level of reimbursements.
In April 2004, the Italian power exchange became operational. As
a result, we are now facing the market risk arising from the
fact that prices on the market are determined by competitive
bidding among participants. However, under the current
regulatory framework, generation companies may also sell
electricity on the free market through freely negotiated
over-the-counter
bilateral contracts with purchasers, and enter into such
contracts, as well as contracts for differences, with the Single
Buyer. Our use of bilateral contracts with purchasers and
contracts for differences with the Single Buyer is contributing
to reduce our power exchange risk exposure. In addition, we
believe that the potential impact of this market risk
vis-ą-vis that faced by our competitors is mitigated by the
homogeneity of the cost structure of Italian generation
companies and by the limited import capacity of the transmission
lines that connect the Italian network with those of other
countries. Finally, for the amount of energy we sell in the
Italian power exchange and for which we do not enter in
contracts for differences with the Single Buyer or bilateral
contracts indexed to fuel prices, our hedging strategy is based
on our assessment of our exposure to changes in power exchange
prices as compared to our generation costs in Italy, using swaps
and other hedging instruments.
Our exchange rate exposure for electricity imports is
principally limited to imports denominated in Swiss francs. In
2005, approximately 48% of our electricity imports by value were
denominated in Swiss francs. The balance of our electricity
imports are denominated in euros, and we do not have an exchange
rate risk on these imports as a result. We actively manage the
exchange rate exposure on our accounts payable in Swiss francs
through the use of the instruments described below.
Almost all of our long-term debt is denominated in euros and as
a result is not subject to exchange rate risk. At
December 31, 2005, we were fully exposed to exchange rate
risk on only
€482 million
out of a total
€11,985 million
in outstanding long-term debt (including approximately
€263 million
of long-term debt which relates to our operating subsidiaries in
North America and Central South America and which is denominated
in the currency of the jurisdictions in which such subsidiaries
operate).
Our financial risk manager is responsible for analyzing,
monitoring and controlling our interest rate and foreign
exchange risk management activities, measuring actual risk
levels on our portfolio of financial instruments and monitoring
compliance with our policies. Our treasurer is responsible for
executing related financial operations. Senior management
provides these two members of our Finance department with
guidance as to the strategic aspects of the management of our
debt portfolio.
Our calculation and measurement techniques are generally
consistent with international banking standards established by
the Basle Committee. Moreover, we believe that our policies
regarding risk levels are generally significantly more
conservative than those established by the Basle Committee.
With respect to commodity risk management, Enel Trade is the
company of our Group in charge of the commercial relations with
operators in the energy and fuel procurement markets, including
purchases of financial derivatives based on energy indexes for
hedging purposes. Under a strict Group risk management policy,
each company of the Group is assigned a maximum amount of risk
that it is allowed to maintain, and enters into derivatives with
Enel Trade in order to reduce its risk below the assigned
maximum allowed amount. Enel Trade aggregates the risk positions
on commodities from our companies through these intercompany
derivatives and purchases of commodities made by it. To reduce
the residual risk following these netting operations below the
maximum limit set annually by the Group’s policy, Enel
Trade uses cash-settled derivatives of the types described below
under “Commodity price risk.” Enel Trade’s use of
such derivative instruments is limited to hedging the
Group’s risks arising from changes in the prices of
physical commodities used in our operations, since we do not buy
and sell derivative instruments for trading or speculative
purposes.
We have used sensitivity analysis to estimate the market risk
exposure associated with our debt and with our foreign exchange,
interest rate and commodity derivatives. Market risk exposure
represents the change in the fair value of financial
instruments, including financial and commodity derivatives,
resulting from an assumed 10% adverse change in market prices or
rates. We determined fair value using pricing models that
measure the effect of changes in market prices according to
market practice for each category of financial instrument. We
have summarized the results of this sensitivity analysis in the
following paragraphs. Actual changes in market prices or rates
may differ from hypothetical changes.
The notional value of a derivative is the contractual amount on
the basis of which the differentials are exchanged. This amount
can be expressed either on a value basis or on a physical
quantities basis such as tons. Amounts expressed in a foreign
currency are converted into euro by applying the exchange rate
at end of the relevant period.
Foreign exchange risk
As explained above, our principal foreign exchange risk relates
to fuel costs and electricity imports. At December 31,2005, we also had foreign exchange risk exposure on
€482 million
in outstanding long-term debt denominated in currencies other
than the euro, which represented 4.0% of our total long-term
debt. Our exposure to foreign currency exchange rates is
primarily in respect of U.S. dollars for fuel purchases and
in respect of Swiss francs for electricity imports, though we
are also exposed to currency risk with regard to the small
proportion of our operations that use a functional currency
other than the euro.
We use forward exchange contracts and currency options in
managing our foreign exchange risk. As of December 31,2005, we had outstanding forward exchange contracts and options
used to hedge our several exchange risks with an aggregate
notional amount of
€1,871 million
(€1,870 million
as of December 31, 2004). In particular, we had:
•
contracts with a notional amount of
€1,569 million
used to hedge the foreign exchange risk related to fuel
purchases, electricity imports and expected cash flows in
currencies other than the euro
(€855 million
as of December 31, 2004); and
•
contracts with a notional amount of
€35 million
used to hedge the foreign exchange risk related to the repayment
of the commercial paper we issued in foreign currency
(€715 million
as of December 31, 2004).
We generally enter into these contracts with respect to the same
amount and date of a repayment obligation or the cash flow that
we expect to generate, thus any change in fair value of these
contracts deriving from a possible appreciation or depreciation
of the euro against other currencies would be fully offset by a
corresponding change in the fair value of the underlying
position.
At the end of 2005, we also had in place
€194 million
of foreign exchange forward contracts
(€215 million
at December 31, 2004) and
€73 million
of options
(€85 million
at December 31, 2004) used to hedge any residual foreign
exchange risk on an aggregate basis.
The fair value of these derivatives was negative by
€6 million
at December 31, 2005 (negative by
€59 million
in 2004). Assuming a 10% depreciation of the euro against all
the other currencies to which we have exchange rate exposure,
the fair value of these financial instruments, including
long-term debt exposed to foreign exchange risk, would have
increased by
€96 million
in 2005 (as compared to an increase of
€57 million
in 2004).
Interest rate risk
Our outstanding total medium-term and long-term debt at
December 31, 2005 amounted to
€11,985 million,
of which
€5,823 million,
or approximately 49% of the total, bore interest at floating
rates, principally based on Euribor, and
€6,162 million,
or 51%, bore interest at fixed rates.
To improve the mix of our fixed and floating rate exposures, we
have entered into interest rate hedging contracts, particularly
interest rate swaps, collars and swaptions. In interest rate
swaps, we agree with other parties to exchange, at specified
intervals, the difference between interest amounts calculated by
reference to the notional principal amount and the fixed or
floating interest rates that we have agreed with the other
parties. An interest rate collar is a combination of options
that enables us to lock our debt cost into a predetermined
interest rate range. We primarily use zero-cost collars that do
not require payment of an option premium. Through a swaption, we
acquire the option to enter into an interest rate swap at a
certain date in the future.
At December 31, 2005, we had entered into outstanding
interest rate derivatives with a notional amount of
€4,993 million
(€10,379 million
at December 31, 2004), of which
€4,865 million
were interest rate swaps
(€9,632 million
at December 31, 2004),
€59 million
were interest rate collars
(€687 million
at December 31, 2004), and
€69 million
were swaptions
(€60 million
at December 31, 2004). The fair value of these derivatives
was negative by
€315 million
at such date (negative by
€420 million
in 2004). You should read note 22 to our consolidated
financial statements for a further discussion of the fair value
of these derivatives. See also “Item 5. Operating and
Financial Review and Prospects — U.S. GAAP
Reconciliation — Critical Accounting Policies under
U.S. GAAP.”
With these contracts in place, we estimate that the portion of
our long-term debt at such date still exposed to interest rate
fluctuations, appropriately weighting the notional value of
interest rate collars, was approximately 16%.
Based on the results of our sensitivity analysis, at
December 31, 2005, a 10% decrease in interest rates would
have increased the net negative fair value of our portfolio of
financial instruments, including long term debt and interest
rate derivatives, by
€247 million
(€46 million
in 2004). However, we do not consider such an
increase in the net negative fair value to be a significant
risk, because it would affect earnings and cash flow only if we
were to reacquire all or a portion of these instruments on the
open market prior to their maturity.
We believe that our effective interest rate risk depends on the
likelihood that interest rates will increase. Because our
revenues are not directly linked to interest rates, our
principal interest rate risk is that a general rise in interest
rates will result in a higher interest expense on the unhedged
portion of our floating-rate debt. If interest rates were to
increase by 10% over December 31, 2005 levels, our
consolidated interest expense, including with respect to long
term debt and interest rate derivatives, would increase by a
total of approximately
€8 million
per year
(€20 million
in 2004). Such amount is the net result of the impact of the
increase in interest charges on the floating rate portion of our
outstanding long term debt, partially offset by positive flows
deriving from our hedging contracts.
Commodity price risk
Beginning in 2000, we adopted a systematic approach to cover
commodity pricing and currency risk linked to the reimbursement
mechanism which was in place until the start of operations of
the power exchange. Enel Trade entered into derivatives
contracts on commodities in order to fix part of the difference
between our costs and the related contribution we received
through tariffs, as well as to manage other risks related to the
purchase of commodities for our trading and gas sale activities.
Since the start of operations of the Italian power exchange, we
have been exposed to electricity price risk resulting from the
fact that prices are determined through competitive bidding by
market participants. Since 2004, to reduce such risks we entered
into fixed price bilateral contracts with counterparties outside
of the Italian power exchange and into contracts for differences
with the Single Buyer, as explained in more detail below. In
2004 we entered into contracts with the GRTN in order to hedge
the risks of the application of congestion fees in the event of
market congestion (congestion contracts). Contracts for 2006
have been signed in January 2006, as a result we did not have
open positions at December 31, 2005. We also hedge price
risk with respect to electricity not covered by these contracts
and to fuel that we purchase for generation activities and gas
that we purchase and sell for trading activities, through the
use of hedging instruments.
Positive or negative changes in the fair value of our derivative
commodities contracts result from an increase or decrease in the
price of the underlying commodities, and are offset by opposite
negative or positive changes in the fair value of our
revenues-cost margin.
Based on the results of our sensitivity analysis, at
December 31, 2005, a 10% increase in commodity price levels
would have caused a decrease in the fair value of our derivative
contracts of
€27 million
(an increase of
€3.8 million
in 2004), while a 10% decrease would have caused a concomitant
increase of
€27 million
(a decrease of
€3.8 million
in 2004).
In 2005, we entered into derivatives contracts on commodities in
order to hedge our exposure to electricity prices and the price
of fuel we use in generation activities with respect to the
amount of energy we sell on the Italian power exchange and for
which we do not enter into either contracts for differences with
the Single Buyer, or bilateral contracts in which the price is
indexed to changes in fuel prices. We believe that changes in
the fair value of these derivative commodities contracts are
generally offset by opposite negative or positive changes in the
fair value of our revenues-cost margin. This will occur
primarily to the extent prices on the Italian power exchange
rise or decline in close relation to rises or declines in prices
of fuels, which we expect will continue until significant
volumes of electricity generated at generation costs lower than
current average generation costs in Italy shall be available as
a result of increased imports and/or the construction of new
plants in Italy.
In 2005, we extended our existing “one-way”contracts
for differences with the Single Buyer to the years 2006 and 2007
and entered new “two-way”contracts for differences
for the year 2006. For a description of “one-way”contracts and “two-way”contracts for differences
please see “Item 4. Information on the
Company — Regulatory Matters — Electricity
Regulation — the Single Buyer”.
The notional value of “one-way”contracts as of
December 31, 2005 was
€6,262 million,
if calculated on the basis of the maximum possible number of
hours of activation under each contract in one year (8,760) and
the average monthly tariff per hour in 2005. The fair value of
these contracts was
€43 million
as of December 31, 2005. The notional value of
“one-way”contracts as of December 31, 2005 was
€7,179 million,
calculated as above, while their fair value was
€57 million
as of December 31, 2005.
In accordance with IFRS, we account for commodity contracts at
fair value in our consolidated financial statements. For
additional detail on the volume of such contracts, please see
“Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and
Prospects — Contractual Obligations and
Commitments.”
We believe that we are not exposed to significant counterparty
risk, or the risk of potential losses that may arise from the
non-fulfillment of contractual obligations by individual
counterparties of our hedging instruments, given the high credit
ratings of our counterparties.
ITEM 12.
DESCRIPTION OF SECURITIES OTHER THAN EQUITY SECURITIES
Not applicable.
PART II
ITEM 13.
DEFAULTS, DIVIDENDS AVERAGES AND DELINQUENCIES
None.
ITEM 14.
MATERIAL MODIFICATIONS TO THE RIGHTS OF SECURITY HOLDERS AND
PROCEEDS
Effective March 31, 2006, Enel removed Citibank, N.A. as
depositary for purposes of issuing the American Depositary
Receipts and appointed as successor depositary JPMorgan Chase
Bank, N.A., with its principal office at 4 New York Plaza, NewYork, New York10004.
ITEM 15.
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Enel carried out an evaluation under the supervision and with
the participation of its management, including its chief
executive officer and its chief financial officers, of the
effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s
disclosure controls and procedures, as of December 31,2005. There are inherent limitations to the effectiveness of any
system of disclosure controls and procedures, including the
possibility of human error and the circumvention or overriding
of the controls and procedures. Accordingly, even effective
disclosure controls and procedures can only provide reasonable
assurance of achieving their control objectives. Based upon
Enel’s evaluation, the Company’s chief executive
officer and chief financial officers concluded that the
Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective
to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be
disclosed in the reports that Enel files or submits under the
Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported,
within the time periods specified in the applicable rules and
forms, and that it is accumulated and communicated to
Enel’s management, including the Company’s chief
executive officer and chief financial officers, as appropriate
to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
ITEM 16.
[RESERVED]
ITEM 16A.
AUDIT COMMITTEE FINANCIAL EXPERT
Enel qualifies for the exemption under Rule 10A-3 under the
Exchange Act from certain of the audit committee requirements
under the rule for foreign private issuers with a board of
statutory auditors established in accordance with local law or
listing requirements and meeting specified requirements which
took effect on July 31, 2005. See “Item 10. Other
Information — Significant Differences in Corporate
Governance Practices for Purposes of Section 303A.11 of the
NYSE Listed Company Manual — Audit Committee and
Internal Audit Function.” Each of the members of
Enel’s board of statutory auditors is currently a
registered chartered
accountant with at least three years’ prior experience as a
statutory auditor; we therefore believe that each is an
“audit committee financial expert” as defined in
Item 16A of
Form 20-F. The
members of the board of statutory auditors are Eugenio Pinto,
chairman of the board of statutory auditors, Carlo Conte and
Franco Fontana. We believe that both Eugenio Pinto and Franco
Fontana are “independent”, within the meaning of
Rule 10A-3(b). Carlo Conte is an executive (dirigente
generale) of the MEF, which is the controlling shareholder
of Enel, and thus not “independent” within the meaning
of Rule 10A-3(b).
ITEM 16B.
CODE OF ETHICS
The Company has adopted a broad code of ethical conduct
applicable to all of its directors, employees and others acting
on its behalf. In addition to this code of ethical conduct, the
Company adopted a specific code of ethics, as defined in
Item 16B of
Form 20-F under
the Exchange Act, as amended, that is applicable to the
Company’s chief executive officer, chief financial
officers, chief accounting officer, controller and persons
performing similar functions to any of the foregoing. This code
of ethics is incorporated by reference as Exhibit 11.1
hereto. If the Company amends the provisions of this code of
ethics that applies to its chief executive officer, chief
financial officers, chief accounting officer, controller and
persons performing similar functions, or if the Company grants
any waiver of such provisions, it will timely disclose such
amendment or waiver through a special
Form 6-K.
ITEM 16C.
PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
Audit and Non-Audit Fees
The following table sets forth the fees billed and to be billed
to the Company by its external auditors, KPMG S.p.A., with
respect to the fiscal years ended December 31, 2004 and
2005, which do not include VAT and expenses:
Audit fees in the above table are the aggregate fees billed and
to be billed by KPMG S.p.A. in connection with the audit of the
Company’s annual and interim financial statements and the
Company’s annual sustainability financial statements.
Audit-related fees in the above table are the aggregate fees
billed and to be billed by KPMG S.p.A. for procedures performed
in connection with the issuance of debt securities and due
diligence relating to acquisitions, dispositions and other
contemplated transactions.
Audit Committee Pre-Approval Policies and
Procedures
Enel’s shareholders are responsible for the appointment of
the external auditors for the performance of the annual
statutory audit, as required by Italian law, on the proposal of
the board of directors. In accordance with Italian law,
Enel’s board of statutory auditors is required to make a
binding recommendation to the shareholders with respect to the
board of directors’ proposal prior to the shareholder vote.
In June 2003, Enel’s board of directors approved a
corporate compliance program to prevent certain criminal
offenses by its management and employees, requiring among other
things that management not engage the external auditors to
perform any audit-related service without first obtaining the
express approval of the internal control committee and, since
July 2005, also of the board of statutory auditors. Proposals to
engage the external
auditors to perform non-audit services, if any, must be approved
by Enel’s board of directors and, since July 2005, also by
the board of statutory auditors, on a case-by-case basis. In
2005, neither the board of directors nor the board of statutory
auditors approved any such engagement.
ITEM 16D.
EXEMPTIONS FROM THE LISTING STANDARDS FOR AUDIT COMMITTEES
Enel qualifies for the exemption under Rule 10A-3 under the
Exchange Act from certain of the audit committee requirements
under the rule for foreign private issuers with a board of
statutory auditors established in accordance with local law or
listing requirements and meeting specified requirements which
took effect on July 31, 2005. See “Item 10. Other
Information — Significant Differences in Corporate
Governance Practices for Purposes of Section 303A.11 of the
NYSE Listed Company Manual — Audit Committee and
Internal Audit Function.”
Given the composition, the professional skills and the tasks
assigned to the Company’s board of statutory auditors, Enel
believes that reliance on such exemption does not materially
adversely affect the ability of the board of statutory auditors
to act independently or to satisfy the other requirements of
Rule 10A-3. For more information on the board of statutory
auditors and on its ability to act independently, please see
“Item 10. Additional Information —
Significant Differences in Corporate Governance Practices for
Purposes of Section 303A.11 of the NYSE Listed Company
Manual — Audit Committee and Internal Audit
Function.”
ITEM 16E.
PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES BY THE ISSUER AND AFFILIATED
PURCHASERS
Neither Enel nor any affiliated purchaser purchased any of
Enel’s ordinary shares during 2004 and 2005.
2.1 Deposit Agreement, as amended, among Enel S.p.A. and
Citibank N.A., as Depositary, and the owners of American
Depositary Receipts (incorporated by reference to the
Registrant’s Registration Statement (File
No. 333-6868) on
Form F-6 effective
as of October 29, 1999 and the Post-effective Amendment
No. 1 to
Form F-6 effective
as of July 9, 2001) and amendment to Deposit Agreement
among Enel S.p.A., JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as successor
Depositary and all holders and beneficial owners from time to
time of ADRs issued thereunder, including the Form of American
Depositary Receipt (incorporated by reference to the
Registrant’s Registration Statement (File
No. 333-132014) on
Form F-6 filed on
February 23, 2006).
4.1 Share Sale and Purchase Agreement between Weather
Investments II S.a.r.l., as Purchaser, and Enel Investment
Holding BV, as Seller, and Enel S.p.A., in relation to certain
undertakings, and Mr. Naguib Sawiris and Os Holding and
April Holding and Weather Investments S.r.l. in respect of
No. 91,681,074 shares of Wind Telecomunicazioni
S.p.A., entered into on May 26, 2005.*
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Shareholders of
ENEL S.p.A.
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of
ENEL S.p.A. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of
December 31, 2005 and 2004 and the related consolidated
statements of income, changes in shareholders’ equity and
cash flows for each of the years in the two-year period ended
December 31, 2005. These consolidated financial statements
are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated
financial statements based on our audits. We did not audit the
consolidated financial statements of the subsidiary Wind
Telecomunicazioni S.p.A. and its consolidated subsidiaries
(“Wind”) as of and for the year ended
December 31, 2004, which statements reflect total
consolidated assets constituting 14% as of December 31,2004 and total consolidated revenues constituting 13% for the
year ended December 31, 2004 of the related consolidated
totals. Those statements were audited by other auditors whose
report has been furnished to us, and our opinion, insofar as it
relates to the amounts included for Wind, is based solely on the
report of the other auditors.
We conduct our audits in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audits, and the
report of the other auditors, provide a reasonable basis for our
opinion.
In our opinion, based on our audits and the report of the other
auditors, the consolidated financial statements referred to
above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial
position of ENEL S.p.A. and subsidiaries as of December 31,2005 and 2004, and the results of their operations and their
cash flows for each of the years in the two-year period ended
December 31, 2005, in conformity with International
Financial Reporting Standards adopted by the European Union.
As discussed in Note 20 to the consolidated financial
statements, in 2005 the Company changed its basis of accounting
from accounting principles generally accepted in Italy to
International Financial Reporting Standards adopted by the
European Union.
International Financial Reporting Standards adopted by the
European Union, vary in certain significant respects from
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America. Information relating to the nature and effect of such
differences is presented in Notes 21, 22 and 23 to the
consolidated financial statements.
Financial income (expense) and income (expense) from investments
8
(714
)
(827
)
(846
)
Income (expense) from investments accounted for using the equity
method
9
(30
)
(25
)
(36
)
(744
)
(852
)
(882
)
Income before taxes
4,794
5,018
5,675
Income taxes
2, 10
1,934
2,116
2,290
Income from continuing operations
2,860
2,902
3,385
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax
2, 5
1,272
(155
)
1,506
Income for the period (shareholders of Parent Company and
minority interests)
4,132
2,747
4,891
Attributable to minority interests
237
116
280
Attributable to shareholders of Parent Company
3,895
2,631
4,611
Earnings per share (euro)
0.67
0.45
0.79
Diluted earnings per share (euro)
0.67
*
0.45
*
0.79
Earnings from continuing operations per share (euro)
0.46
0.48
0.54
Diluted earnings from continuing operations per share (euro)
0.46
*
0.48
*
0.54
Earnings from discontinued operations per share (euro)
0.21
(0.03
)
0.25
Diluted earnings from discontinued operations per share (euro)
0.21
*
(0.03
)*
0.25
(*)
Calculated by adjusting the average number of ordinary shares
for the period (6,171,352,406) to take account of the diluting
effect of stock options for the period (euro 29 million),
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
Enel S.p.A. (the “Parent”) and its subsidiaries (the
“Subsidiaries” or the “Subsidiary
Companies”), (collectively the “Company” or
“Enel”) are involved in the generation, distribution
and sale of electricity, providing the majority of the electric
service in Italy. Gas distribution and sale, fuel trading,
engineering and contracting represent the other principal
activities of Enel. International operations are mainly
represented by the generation and distribution of electricity in
Spain and Romania.
Enel’s privatization was launched in 1999 when 31.7% of its
capital stock, were placed on the market, with the net proceeds
going to the Italian Ministry of Economy and Finance (the
“MEF”) of the Republic of Italy. In 2003, the MEF sold
approximately 6.6% of its capital stock of the Parent Company to
Morgan Stanley & Co. International Limited. In 2004,
the MEF sold an additional 18.9% of its capital stock of the
Parent Company through a public offering. In July 2005, the MEF
sold a further 9.4% of the Parent Company’s share capital
in through a public offering in Italy and a private placement to
institutional investors. At December 31, 2005, 21.4% of the
share capital of the Parent Company is owned by the MEF and
10.2% is owned by Cassa Depositi e Prestiti S.p.A. As of that
date, no other entity or individual held 2% or more of the
Company’s outstanding ordinary shares.
On March 29, 2001, Enel, which owned a 56.63% interest in
Wind through its wholly owned subsidiary Enel Investment Holding
BV, purchased 100% of the share capital of Infostrada S.p.A.
(fixed line telecommunications operator in Italy). The
acquisition was treated as a purchase, with resulting goodwill,
including direct acquisition costs, of
euro 7,632 million (see Note 12.b).
On July 30, 2001, Enel Investment Holding BV contributed
its 100% interest in Infostrada S.p.A. to Wind against receipt
of shares of Wind corresponding to 38.7% of the share capital of
Wind, after the stock issuance, increasing Enel’s share to
73.42%. For consolidation purposes, this transaction was treated
as a reorganization under common control, and accordingly the
assets and liabilities transferred were accounted for at their
carrying values.
On March 20, 2003, Enel reached an agreement for the
acquisition of the 26.6% share in Wind’s capital stock held
by the France Telecom Group, thus achieving full ownership of
Wind. The purchase price for the acquisition amounts to
euro 1,330 million. In addition to the purchase price
the seller was reimbursed euro 59 million of capital
contribution made to Wind. The transfer of the shares and the
payment of the price agreed, in addition to the assumption by
Enel of the euro 175 million subordinated loan, took
place on July 1, 2003.
In January 2002, the Company purchased 100% of the share capital
of Electra de Viesgo SL (Viesgo), the holding company of the
Viesgo Group, the fourth largest electricity operator in Spain,
for euro 1,920 million. The acquisition was accounted
for as a purchase, with resulting goodwill of
euro 757 million (see Note 12.b).
In May 2002, the Company purchased 98.81% of the share capital
of Camuzzi Gazometri SpA, the second largest distributor of
natural gas in Italy, for euro 1,045 million. The
acquisition was accounted for as a purchase, with resulting
goodwill of euro 597 million.
On May 31, 2002, the Company sold 100% of the share capital
of Eurogen S.p.A. to Edipower S.p.A., a consortium led by Edison
SpA, for euro 2,980 million resulting in a gain of
euro 2,313 million.
On January 29, 2003, the Company sold 100% of the share
capital of Interpower S.p.A. to the Energia
Italiana-ACEA-Electrabel consortium for
euro 532 million with a resulting gain of
euro 356 million.
On March 5, 2003, Enel Produzione acquired for
euro 75.7 million a 60% share in the capital stock of
Dutch company Entergy Power Holding Maritza BV (Maritza), which
in turn controls 73% of the Bulgarian company Maritza
East III Power Company AD. The latter will carry out the
refurbishment and environmental upgrade of a lignite-fired
generation plant, and will subsequently manage the plant. Enel
holds a call option on 40% of the
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS — (Continued)
capital stock of Maritza. The acquisition was accounted for as a
purchase, with resulting goodwill of euro 16 million.
On December 31, 2003, the Company purchased 80% of
Uniņn Fenosa Energģas Especiales, a Spanish operator
in the generation from renewable resources, for euro
178 million, while Uniņn Fenosa purchased a call
option, expiring at the end of 2007, on 30% of the shares. On
May 30, 2006 Union Fenosa exercised the call option on 30%
of Enel Union Fenosa Renovables (EUFER). The Company and Union
Fenosa now control 50% of EUFER share capital and they have the
joint management of EUFER. Union Fenosa paid Enel a total
consideration of euro 72 million.
In 2004, the Company purchased Ottogas Group, Sicilmetano Group
and Italgestioni Group, all active in the distribution and sale
of gas for a total of euro 104 million. These
acquisitions were accounted for as purchases, with resulting
goodwill of euro 8 million.
On June 23, 2004, the Company completed the Initial Public
Offering (IPO) of 50% of the share capital of Terna, its
subsidiary constituting the Transmission Division. Under the
terms of the IPO, 1,000,000 shares have been sold to
financial institutions and to the public at
euro 1.70 per share. In 2005 the Company completed a
further two disposals amounting to 43.85% of Terna’s
capital for a total consideration of
euro 1,315 million, with a resulting gain of
euro 1,149 million.
On April 28, 2005the Company acquired a 24.62% stake in
Romanian electricity distribution companies Electrica Banat and
Electrica Dobrogea for euro 51 million. The total value of
the transaction, equal to euro 131 million, included
the simultaneous subscription of a capital increase, bringing
Enel’s share in the two companies to 51%.
On August 11, 2005 Enel completed the first step of the
sale of Wind Telecomunicazioni SpA to Weather Investment
(Weather). Specifically, the Company sold a 62.75% stake in Wind
to a subsidiary of Weather for euro 2,986 million,
fully paid in cash, with a resulting gain of
euro 4 million. On the same date, Enel also subscribed
a capital increase in Weather, acquiring a 5.2% stake for
euro 305 million and both companies entered into a
mutual put and call option on 6.28% of the capital stock of Wind
for euro 328 million to be paid in cash. On
February 8, 2006, Weather exercised the call option on the
6.28% interest in Wind for a consideration of
euro 328 million fully paid in cash. The Company also
contributed to Weather its remaining 30.97% stake in Wind in
exchange for a 20.9% ownership interest in Weather.
(2)
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING AND REPORTING POLICIES
Basis of Presentation
The consolidated financial statements of the Company for each of
the years in the two year period ended December 31, 2005
have been prepared in accordance with international accounting
standards (International Accounting Standards (IAS) or
International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS)), the
interpretations of the International Financial Reporting
Interpretations Committee (IFRIC) and the Standing
Interpretations Committee (SIC) endorsed by the European
Commission (hereinafter, “IFRS-EU”).
The accounting policies applied in these consolidated financial
statements are in conformity with those adopted in the
preparation of the opening balance at January 1, 2004, the
income statement for the year 2004 and the balance sheet at
December 31, 2004 pursuant to IFRS-EU, as indicated in
note 20 “Transition to International Financial
Reporting Standards (IFRS-EU).
Differences between the Company’s accounting principles and
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States
(“U.S. GAAP”) and their effects on consolidated
shareholders’ equity as of December 31, 2005 and 2004
and on consolidated net income for each of the years in the two
year period ended December 31, 2005, are described in
Notes 21 and 22.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS — (Continued)
The Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements are
presented in euro. The translations of the euro amounts into
U.S. Dollars (“USD”) at the rate of
USD 1.1842 to 1 euro are included solely for the
convenience of the reader, using the noon buying rate in New
York City for cable transfers in euro, as certified for customs
purposes by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York on
December 31, 2005. The convenience translations should not
be construed as representations that the euro amounts have been,
could have been, or could in the future be, converted into USD
at this or any other rate of exchange.
Use of estimates
Preparing the consolidated financial statements under IFRS-EU
requires the use of estimates and assumptions that impact the
carrying amount of assets and liabilities and the related
information on the items involved as well as the disclosure
required for contingent assets and liabilities at the balance
sheet date. The estimates and the related assumptions are based
on previous experience and other factors considered reasonable
in the circumstances. They are formulated when the carrying
amount of assets and liabilities is not easily determined from
other sources. The actual results may differ from these
estimates. The provisions for doubtful accounts, inventory
obsolescence, amortization/depreciation, impairment losses,
employee benefits, taxation and other provisions are based on
these estimates. The estimates and assumptions are periodically
reviewed and the impact of any change is recognized in profit or
loss where such change regards only the period under
consideration. If the review should involve both current and
future periods, the change is recognized in the period in which
the review is conducted and in the related future periods.
Subsidiaries comprise those entities for which the Company has
the direct or indirect power to determine their financial and
operating policies for the purposes of obtaining the benefits of
their activities. In assessing the existence of a situation of
control, account is also taken of potential voting rights that
are effectively exercisable or convertible. The financial
statements of the subsidiaries are consolidated as from the date
control is acquired until such control ceases.
Associated companies
Associated companies comprise those entities in which the
Company has a significant influence. They are initially
recognized at cost and are subsequently measured using the
equity method. The Company’s share of profit or loss is
recognized in the consolidated financial statements from the
date on which it acquires the significant influence over the
entity until such influence ceases.
Should the Company’s share of the loss for the period
exceed the carrying amount of the investment, the latter is
impaired and any excess recognized in a provision if the Company
has a legal or constructive obligation to cover the
associate’s loss.
Joint ventures
Interests in joint ventures — enterprises in which the
Company exercises joint control with other entities —
are consolidated using the proportionate method. The Company
recognizes its share of the assets, liabilities, revenues and
expenses on a line-by-line basis in proportion to the
Company’s share in the entity from the date on which joint
control is acquired until such control ceases.
Special Purpose Entity
The Company consolidates a Special Purpose Entity (SPE) if,
due to certain circumstances, the Company in substance controls
it. In substance control is obtained if the entity retains a
significant beneficial interest in the SPE, even if it owns
little or no equity in the SPE.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS — (Continued)
Consolidation procedures
All financial statements used to prepare the consolidated
financial statements are as of and for the year ended
December 31, 2005 and are prepared in accordance with
IFRS-EU.
All intragroup balances and transactions, including any
unrealized profits or losses on transactions within the Company,
are eliminated, net of the theoretical tax effect, if material.
Unrealized gains or losses with associates and joint ventures
are eliminated for the part pertaining to the Company.
In both cases, unrealized losses are eliminated except when
relating to impairment.
Translation of foreign currency items
Each consolidated subsidiary prepares its financial statements
in the functional currency of the economy in which it operates.
All transactions in currencies other than the functional
currency are recognized in these financial statements at the
exchange rate prevailing on the date of the transaction.
Monetary assets and liabilities denominated in a foreign
currency other than the functional currency are later adjusted
using the balance sheet exchange rate. Any exchange rate
differences are recognized in profit or loss.
Non-monetary assets and liabilities in foreign currency stated
at historic cost are translated using the exchange rate
prevailing on the date of initial recognition of the
transaction. Non-monetary assets and liabilities in foreign
currency carried at fair value are translated using the exchange
rate prevailing on the date the related carrying amount is
determined.
Translation of financial statements denominated in a foreign
currency
For the purposes of the consolidated financial statements, all
profits/losses, assets and liabilities are stated in euro, which
is the functional currency of the Parent Company.
In order to prepare the consolidated financial statements,
financial statements in functional currencies other than the
euro are translated into euro by applying the relevant
period-end exchange rate to the assets and liabilities,
including goodwill and consolidation adjustments, and the
average exchange rate for the period, which approximates the
exchange rates prevailing at the date of the respective
transactions, to the income statement. Any resulting exchange
rate gains or losses are recognized in a separate component of
equity. The gains and losses are recognized to the income
statement on the disposal of the subsidiary.
Business combinations
All business combinations are recognized using the purchase
method, where the purchase cost is equal to fair value at the
date of the exchange of the assets acquired and the liabilities
assumed, plus any costs directly attributable to the
acquisition. This cost is allocated by recognizing the assets,
liabilities and identifiable contingent liabilities of the
acquiree at fair values. Any positive difference between the
purchase costs and the fair value of the net assets acquired is
recognized as goodwill. Any negative difference is recognized in
profit or loss.
On first-time adoption of the IFRS-EU, the Company elected to
not apply IFRS 3 (Business combinations) retrospectively to
acquisitions carried out before January 1, 2004.
Accordingly, the goodwill associated with acquisitions carried
out prior to the IFRS-EU transition date is still carried at the
amount reported in the last consolidated financial statements
prepared on the basis of previous accounting standards
(December 31, 2003).
Property, plant and equipment
Property, plant and equipment is recognized at historic cost,
including directly attributable ancillary costs necessary for
the asset to be ready for use. It is increased by the present
value of the estimate of the costs of
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS — (Continued)
dismantling and removing the asset where there is a legal or
constructive obligation to do so. The corresponding liability is
recognized under provisions for risks and charges. Borrowing
costs in respect of loans granted for the purchase of assets are
recognized in profit or loss as an expense in the period in
which they are incurred.
Subsequent expenditure relating to an item of property, plant
and equipment is recognized as an increase in the carrying
amount of the asset when it is probable that future economic
benefits deriving from the cost incurred to replace a component
of such item will flow to the enterprise and the cost of the
item can be reliably determined. All other expenditure is
recognized as an expense in the period in which it is incurred.
Where major components of property, plant and equipment have
different useful lives, the components are recognized separately.
Certain property, plant and equipment, that was revalued at
January 2004 (the transition date) or in previous periods is
recognized at their revalued amount, which is considered as its
deemed cost at the revaluation date.
Property, plant and equipment is reported net of accumulated
depreciation and any impairment losses. Depreciation is
calculated on a straight-line basis over the item’s
estimated useful life, which is reviewed annually, and any
changes are reflected on a prospective basis. Depreciation
begins when the asset is ready for use.
The estimated useful life of the main items of property, plant
and equipment is as follows:
Useful Life
Civil buildings
40 years
Hydroelectric power plants(1)
40 years
Thermoelectric power plants(1)(2)
40 years
Geothermal power plants(3)
20 years
Alternative energy power plants(4)
20 years
Transport lines
40 years
Transformation plant
32-42 years
Medium- and low-voltage distribution networks
30-40 years
Gas distribution networks and meters
25-50 years
Telecommunications systems and networks
5.5-20 years
Industrial and commercial equipment
4 years
(1)
Excluding assets to be relinquished at end of concession, which
are depreciated over the duration of the concession if shorter
than useful life.
(2-4)
Useful life as from January 1, 2005; previously it was
equal to (2) 20 years; (3) 12.5 years;
(4) 21.3 years. For additional details, please see
note 12.a.
Land, both unbuilt and on which civil and industrial buildings
stand, is not depreciated as it has an indefinite useful life.
Enel is the concession holder for the distribution and sale of
electricity to the regulated market. The concession, granted by
the Ministry for Productive Activities, was issued free of
charge and terminates on December 31, 2030. If the
concession is not renewed upon expiry, the grantor is required
to pay the Company an indemnity, at current values, for the
assets owned by the Company that serve the concession. These
assets, which comprise the electricity distribution networks,
are recognized under “Property, plant and equipment”
and are depreciated over their useful lives.
The Company’s plants include assets to be relinquished at
the end of the concession. These mainly regard major water
diversion works and the public lands used for the operation of
the thermal power plants. The
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS — (Continued)
Tconcessions terminate in 2029 and in 2020, respectively (2010
for plants located in the Autonomous Provinces of Trento and
Bolzano). If the concessions are not renewed at those dates all
intake and governing works, penstocks, outflow channels and
other assets on public lands will be relinquished free of charge
to the State in good operating condition. The Company believes
that the ordinary maintenance activities guarantee a good
operating condition of the assets at the termination date.
The Company operates on the gas distribution system network
under concessions awarded by local authorities pursuant to
tender procedures for periods not longer than 12 years.
Through service agreements, local authorities may regulate the
terms and conditions for the provision of the service and the
quality objectives to be achieved. The tenders are awarded based
on financial terms, quality and safety standards, investment
plans and technological and management skills offered. The
majority of Enel’s existing gas distribution concessions
are currently due to expire on December 31, 2009. At the
term of the concession, the distribution system network is
subject to a new tender in order to obtain a concession renewal.
If the concession is not renewed, the new granter is required to
pay the Company an indemnity at current value of the assets that
serve the concession, or the assets to be relinquished, in good
operating condition. The assets constituting the gas
distribution network are recognized in property, plant and
equipment and are depreciated over the shorter of their useful
lives or the the concession term.
Property, plant and equipment acquired under finance leases,
whereby all risks and rewards incident to ownership is
substantially transferred to the Company, is recognized as
Company assets at the lower of fair value and the present value
of the minimum lease payments due, including the payment
required to exercise any purchase option. The corresponding
liability due to the lessor is recognized under financial
payables. The assets are depreciated on the basis of their
useful lives. If there is no reasonable certainty that the
Company will obtain the ownership by the end of the lease,
property, plant and equipment is depreciated over the shorter of
the lease term and its useful life.
Leases where the lessor substantially retains all risks and
rewards incident to ownership are classified as operating
leases. Operating lease costs are taken to profit or loss on a
systematic basis over the term of the lease.
Intangible assets
Intangible assets, all with a definite useful life, are measured
at cost, shown net of accumulated amortization and any
impairment losses, determined as set out below. Amortization is
calculated on a straight-line basis over the item’s
estimated useful life, which is checked annually and any changes
are reflected on a prospective basis. Amortization commences
when the asset is ready for use. The estimated useful life of
the main intangible assets is reported in the notes to the
caption.
Goodwill deriving from the acquisition of subsidiaries,
associated companies or joint ventures is allocated to each of
the cash-generating units identified. After initial recognition,
goodwill is not amortized and is adjusted for any impairment
losses. Goodwill relating to investments in associates is
included in their carrying amount.
Impairment losses
Property, plant and equipment and intangible assets with a
definite life are reviewed at each balance sheet date to
determine whether there is an indication of impairment. If such
indication exists, the recoverable amount is estimated.
The recoverable amount of goodwill and intangible assets with an
indefinite useful life, if any, as well as that of intangible
assets not yet available for use, is estimated annually.
The recoverable amount is the higher of an asset’s fair
value less cost to sale and its value in use.
Value in use is determined by discounting estimated future cash
flows using a pre-tax discount rate that reflects the current
market assessment of the time value of money and the specific
risks of the asset. The
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS — (Continued)
recoverable amount of assets that do not generate independent
cash flows is determined based on the cash-generating unit to
which the asset belongs.
An impairment loss is recognized in the income statement if an
asset’s carrying amount or that of the cash-generating unit
to which it is allocated is higher than its recoverable amount.
Impairment losses of cash generating units are first charged
against the carrying amount of any goodwill attributed to it and
then against the value of other assets, in proportion to its
carrying amount.
With the exception of those recognized for goodwill, impairment
losses are reversed if the impairment is no longer present or
there has been a change in the assumptions used to determine the
recoverable amount.
Inventories
Inventories are measured at the lower of cost and estimated
realizable value. Average weighted cost is used, which includes
related additional charges.
Financial instruments
Debt securities
Debt securities that the Company intends and is able to hold
until maturity are recognized at the trade date and, upon
initial recognition, are measured at fair value including
transaction costs; subsequently, they are measured at amortized
cost using the effective interest rate method, net of any
impairment losses determined as the lower between the carrying
amount and the present value of estimated future cash flows,
discounted at the original effective interest rate.
Debt securities held for trading are initially recognized at
fair value and subsequent variations are recognized in profit or
loss.
Equity investments in other entities and other financial
assets
Equity investments in entities other than subsidiaries or
associates and other financial assets (if classified as
available for sale) are recognized at fair value with any gains
or losses recognized in equity or (if classified as “fair
value through profit or loss”) in profit or loss. The
amount of the impairment loss is measured as the difference
between its carrying amount and the present value of estimated
future cash flows discounted at the current market rate of
return for similar assets. On the sale of available-for-sale
assets, any accumulated gains and losses are released to the
income statement.
When the fair value cannot be determined reliably, equity
investments in other entities are measured at cost adjusted by
impairment losses with any gains or losses recognized in profit
or loss. Such impairment losses are not reversed.
Trade receivables
Trade receivables are recognized at amortized cost, net of any
impairment losses. Impairment is determined on the basis of the
present value of estimated future cash flows, discounted at the
original effective interest rate.
Trade receivables falling due in line with generally accepted
trade terms are not discounted.
Cash and cash equivalents
This category is used to record cash and cash equivalents that
are available on demand or at very short term and do not incur
collection costs.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS — (Continued)
Cash and cash equivalents are recognized net of bank overdrafts
at period-end in the consolidated statement of cash flows.
Trade payables
Trade payables are recognized at amortized cost.
Financial liabilities
Financial liabilities other than derivatives are initially
recognized at the settlement date at fair value, less directly
attributable transaction costs. Financial liabilities are
subsequently measured at amortized cost using the original
effective interest rate method.
Derivative financial instruments
Derivatives are recognized at the trade date at fair value and
are classified as hedging instruments when the relationship
between the derivative and the hedged item is formally
documented and the effectiveness of the hedge (assessed
periodically) is high.
When the derivatives are used to hedge the risk of changes in
the fair value of hedged items, they are recognized at fair
value with any changes taken to profit or loss. The hedged items
are adjusted similarly to reflect changes in fair value related
to the hedged risk.
When derivatives are used to hedge the risk of changes in the
cash flows generated by the hedged instruments, changes in fair
value are initially recognized in equity and subsequently
released to profit or loss in line with the gains and losses on
the hedging transaction.
Changes in the fair value of derivatives that do not qualify for
hedge accounting under IFRS-EU are recognized in profit or loss.
The instruments are recognized at the trade date.
Employee benefits
Liabilities related to employee benefits paid upon leaving or
after ceasing employment in connection with defined benefit
plans or other long-term benefits accrued during the employment
period, which are recognized net of any plan assets, are
determined separately for each plan, using actuarial assumptions
to estimate the amount of the future benefits that employees
have accrued at the balance-sheet date. The liability is
recognized on an accruals basis over the vesting period of the
related rights. These appraisals are performed by independent
actuaries.
All actuarial gains and losses at January 1, 2004, the date
of transition to IFRS-EU, were recognized. Following
January 1, 2004, net cumulative unrecognized actuarial
gains and losses exceeding 10% of the greater of either the
present value of the defined benefit obligation and the fair
value of the plan assets are recognized in profit or loss over
the expected average remaining working lives of the employees
participating in the plan. Otherwise, they are not recognized.
Share-based payments
The cost of services rendered by employees and remunerated
through stock option plans is determined based on the fair value
of the options granted to employees at the grant date.
The calculation method to determine the fair value considers all
characteristics of the option (option term, price and exercise
conditions, etc.), as well as the Enel share price at the grant
date, the volatility of the stock and
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS — (Continued)
the interest yield curve at the grant date consistent with the
expected life of the plan. The pricing model used is the
Cox-Rubinstein.
This cost is recognized in the income statement over the vesting
period considering the best estimate possible of the number of
options that will become exercisable.
Provisions for risks and charges
Accruals to the provisions for risks and charges are recognized
when there is a legal or constructive obligation as a result of
a past event at period-end, the settlement of which is expected
to result in an outflow of resources whose amount can be
reliably estimated. If the impact is significant, the accruals
are determined by discounting expected future cash flows using a
pre-tax discount rate that reflects the current market
assessment of the time value of money and, if applicable, the
risks specific to the liability. If the amount is discounted,
the increase in the provision over time is recognized as a
financial expense. When the liability relates to property, plant
and equipment (e.g. dismantling and restoration of sites), the
provision offsets the related asset. The expense is recognized
in profit or loss through the depreciation of the item of
property, plant and equipment to which it relates.
Changes in estimates are recognized in the income statement in
the period in which the changes occur.
Starting from 2005, in order to reduce the
CO2
emission the Company must comply with a specific allocation plan
of
CO2
emission quota issued by the Italian Environment Ministry. If
the Company’s actual emission is higher than the emission
quota assigned the Company is required to cover such deficit in
the first few months of the subsequent year. The obligation is
recognized as an allowance under the heading “Provisions
for risk and charges” in the consolidated balance sheet and
the related cost is recorded as “Other operating
expenses” in the consolidated income statement. The
allowance is measured on the basis of the deficit quota’s
market — price value at the balance sheet date.
Grants
Grants from public entities and private third parties are
recognized at fair value when it is reasonably certain that they
will be received and that the conditions for receipt have been
met.
Grants received for specific expenditure are recognized as other
liabilities and credited to other income on a systematic basis
over the period in which the related costs accrue.
Grants received for specific assets, the value of which is
recognized as an item of property, plant and equipment or an
intangible asset are recognized as other liabilities and taken
to the income statement over the asset’s
amortization/depreciation period.
Operating grants are fully recognized in profit or loss when the
conditions for their recognition are met.
Revenues
Revenues are recognized using the following criteria depending
on the type of transaction:
•
revenues from the sale of goods are recognized when the
significant risks and rewards of ownership are transferred to
the buyer;
•
revenues from the sale and transport of electricity and gas are
recognized when the supply or service is provided, even if these
have not yet been invoiced, and are determined using estimates
as well as the fixed meter reading figures. Where applicable,
this revenue is based on the rates and related components
established by the Electricity and Gas Authority or the
corresponding foreign authorities during the applicable period.
Specifically, the Energy Authority in 2004 established a price
equalizing mechanism intended to minimize the effects of a
timing discrepancy in the setting of prices distributors pay to
the
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS — (Continued)
Single Buyer for electricity to be distributed on the regulated
market and the prices that distributors may charge to end users
on the regulate market. At the closing date, the Company
reflects in revenue its best estimate of costs incurred by the
Single Buyer not yet reflected in the electricity sale price to
end users;
•
revenues from the rendering of services are recognized in line
with the stage of completion of the services;
•
the connection fees related to the electricity distribution are
considered as standalone transaction and all other services are
paid for separately; based on this assumption such fees are
recognized up-front as revenues, since no further obligation for
the Company exists and all other service are paid for separately;
•
revenues for the telecommunications sector from traffic,
interconnections and roaming are recorded according to the usage
by customers and telephone operators calculated on an accrual
basis. Such revenues include the amount relating to the access
to and use of the Company’s network by customers and other
domestic and international telephone operators. Revenues from
the sale of rechargeable telephone cards are recorded solely for
the amount corresponding to prepaid traffic effectively used by
customers during the year. The prepaid traffic not yed used as
of balance sheet date is recognized as “deferred
income”. Revenues from the sale of mobile and fixed
telephones and related accessories are recorded at the time of
the transfer of ownership.
Financial income and expense
Financial income and expense is recognized on an accruals basis
in line with interest accrued on the net carrying amount of the
related financial assets and liabilities using the effective
interest rate method.
Dividends
Revenue is recognized when the shareholder’s right to
receive dividends is established.
Dividends and interim dividends payable to third parties are
recognized as changes in equity at the date they are approved by
the Shareholders’ Meeting and the Board of Directors,
respectively.
Income taxes
Current income taxes, which are recognized under tax payables
net of payments on account, are determined using an estimate of
taxable income and in conformity with the relevant tax
regulations.
Deferred tax liabilities and assets are calculated on the
temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and
liabilities in the consolidated financial statements and their
corresponding values recognized for tax purposes on the basis of
tax rates in effect on the date the temporary difference will
reverse, which is determined on the basis of current tax rates
at the balance sheet date.
Deferred tax assets are recognized when recovery is probable,
i.e. when an entity expects to have sufficient future taxable
income to recover the asset.
The recoverability of deferred tax assets is reviewed at each
period-end.
Discontinued operations and non-current assets held for
sale
The assets or groups of assets and liabilities whose carrying
amount will mainly be recovered through sale, rather than
through ongoing use, are shown separately from the other
balance-sheet assets and liabilities. Assets classified as
held-for-sale are measured at the lower of the carrying amount
and estimated realizable value, net of sales costs. Any losses
are directly expensed in the income statement. The corresponding
values for the previous period are not reclassified.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS — (Continued)
Revenues, expenses and gains or losses recognized on the
disposal of the assets constituting a discontinued operation are
presented separately on the income statement, net of the tax
effects. Previous periods presented are reclassified
correspondly, for comparative purposes.
Risk management
As part of its operations, Enel is exposed to different market
risks, notably the risk of changes in interest rates, exchange
rates and commodity prices.
To minimize this exposure, Enel enters into derivatives
contracts to hedge individual transactions and overall exposures
using instruments available on the market.
Transactions that qualify for hedge accounting under IFRS-EU are
designated as hedging transactions, while those entered into
with the intention of hedging but that do not qualify for hedge
accounting are classified as trading transactions. Enel does not
use derivatives for speculative purposes.
The financial assets and liabilities associated with derivative
instruments are classified as:
•
cash flow hedges, related to hedging the risk of changes in the
cash flows on certain long-term floating-rate loans;
•
fair value hedges, related to hedging the risk of changes in the
fair value of fixed-rate liabilities;
•
trading derivatives, related to hedging interest and exchange
rate risk and commodity risk but which do not qualify for
recognition under IAS 39 as hedges of specific assets,
liabilities, commitments or future transactions.
The fair value is determined using the official prices for
instruments traded on regulated markets for interest rate
derivatives and loans covered by fair value hedges. The fair
value of instruments not listed on regulated markets is
determined by discounting expected future cash flows on the
basis of the market interest rate yield curve at the balance
sheet date and translating amounts in currencies other than the
euro using period-end rates provided by the European Central
Bank. Where possible, contracts relating to commodities are
measured using market prices related to the same instruments on
both regulated and other markets. Contracts for differences are
measured using a model based on the forward prices at the
valuation date for the energy commodities analyzed, estimating
developments in the electricity market in the reference period.
The measurement techniques used for the open derivatives
positions at the end of the year are the same as those adopted
the previous year. Accordingly, the impact on profit or loss and
shareholders equity of such measurement is essentially
attributable to normal market developments. The credit risk in
respect of the derivatives portfolio is considered negligible
since transactions are conducted solely with leading Italian and
international banks, diversifying the exposure among different
institutions.
Interest rate risk
Various types of derivatives are used to reduce the amount of
debt exposed to interest rate fluctuations and to reduce
borrowing costs. These include interest rate swaps, interest
rate collars and swaptions.
These contracts are normally agreed with a notional amount and
expiry date lower than or equal to that of the underlying
financial liability, so that any change in the fair value and/or
expected future cash flows of these contracts is offset by a
corresponding change in the fair value and/or the expected
future cash flows from the underlying position.
The overall market value of interest rate derivatives in cash
flow hedges at December 31, 2005 was a negative
euro 261 million.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS — (Continued)
The following table reports the expected net financial expense
in respect of these derivatives in the coming years (in millions
of euro):
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
Beyond
62
45
41
25
21
91
Exchange rate risk
Various types of derivatives are used to reduce the exchange
rate risk on foreign currency assets, liabilities and expected
future cash flows. These include forward contracts and options.
These contracts are also normally agreed with a notional amount
and expiry date equal to that of the underlying financial
liability or the expected future cash flows, so that any change
in the fair value and/or future cash flows of these contracts
stemming from a potential appreciation or depreciation of the
euro against other currencies is fully offset by a corresponding
change in the fair value and/or the expected future cash flows
of the underlying position.
Commodity risk
Various types of derivatives are used to reduce the exposure to
fluctuations in commodity prices. These include swaps and
futures.
For purchases of fuel for electricity generation and purchases
of gas for resale, the exposure to the risk of changes in the
commodity prices to which the related contracts are indexed is
hedged. The overall risk is quantified by breaking down the
contracts that generate exposure into their indexing components
and reaggregating these components into uniform risk factors
that can be managed in the market.
The Single Buyer uses “one-way contracts for
differences” to hedge changes in the price of energy
purchased on the Power Exchange for the regulated market. Under
these contracts, if the Single National Price (SNP) exceeds
the strike price, the difference between the SNP and the strike
price is paid to the Single Buyer. If the SNP is lower than or
equal to the strike price, the differences are not settled by
the Single Buyer. In both cases, the Single Buyer pays Enel a
fixed premium equal to the amount set by the auction for the
relevant product. For “two-way”contracts, the
difference is paid to the Single Buyer if the SNP exceeds the
strike price and to Enel in the opposite case. No premium is
envisaged for these contracts.
For energy sold on the Power Exchange, Enel manages the residual
risk not stabilized through “two-way”contracts for
differences by assessing the exposure to market price
fluctuations in relation to generation cost developments in
Italy. The measurement of this exposure is also based on the
effectiveness of the hedging strategies implemented. The current
regulatory framework also allows producers to sell electricity
to eligible customers on the free market through bilateral
negotiations. This type of contract can be linked to both fixed
and variable prices. The exposure to possible price fluctuations
is hedged with derivatives.
Finally, as part of commercial activities related to purchasing
fuels for thermal generation and the sale of electricity and gas
to eligible customers, Enel grants trade credit to external
counterparties. The counterparties selected are carefully
monitored through the assessment of the related credit risk and
the pledge of suitable guarantees and/or security deposits to
ensure adequate protection from default risk.
The notes to the consolidated financial statements show the
notional amount and the fair value of each derivative type at
December 31, 2005, grouped into current and non-current
financial assets and liabilities.
Concentrations of Risk
The Company’s business is largely determined by laws,
regulations and policies established by the European Union and
the Italian government. The regulatory framework for the Italian
electricity market has changed
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS — (Continued)
significantly in recent years with the implementation of the
Bersani Decree, designed to liberalize and create more
competition in the Italian electricity market. The changes
caused by the Bersani Decree include the adoption of a new
tariff structure, the reorganization of the Company’s
generation, transmission and distribution operations into
separate business units, the restructuring of the Company’s
transmission business in order to transfer the management of the
transmission network to the Gestore della Rete (or GRTN), and
the requirement that the Company would sell no less than
15,000 MW of its generating capacity. The disposal of such
generating capacity was completed in 2003. The Bersani Decree
was amended following the enactment of a law in October 2003
that provided, among other things, for the reunification of
management and operation of the national transmission grid with
its ownership under a single private entity. An implementing
decree enacted in May 2004 provided for the transfer from the
Gestore della Rete to Terna of the responsibility to manage the
national transmission grid and the related assets by
October 31, 2005, although the Gestore della Rete will
still retain its other responsibilities. Following this
transfer, the Company no longer controls Terna, as no
electricity operator, including Enel, shall be entitled to
voting rights in excess of 5% with respect to the appointment of
Terna’s directors. In addition, the Company was legally
required to reduce its holding in Terna to no more than 20% by
July 1, 2007. The Company has reduced such holding to 5.12%
in 2005 through the sale of 29.99% of Terna share to Cassa
Depositi e Prestiti.
Tariff Structure
Prices paid by all Italian customers for electricity include a
transmission component, a distribution component, a generation
component covering the price of the electricity itself and
system charges. Under the current electricity tariff regime, all
customers pay regulated prices, set either directly by the
Energy Authority or in accordance with Energy Authority
guidelines and subject to its approval, for the transmission and
distribution components and system charges. The transmission and
distribution components, together referred to as “transport
charges,” are subject to a price cap mechanism aimed at
progressively reducing these charges on the basis of annual
efficiency targets. For customers purchasing electricity on the
regulated market, the Energy Authority also regulates the
generation component, which is set on a quarterly basis, while
customers purchasing electricity on the free market pay prices
agreed through bilateral contracts or on the power exchange. The
Energy Authority sets base tariff levels every four years.
In 2004, the Energy Authority set new base tariffs for the
2004-2007 period, which have been in force since
February 1, 2004. The tariff structure currently in place
also includes certain mechanisms to take into account structural
factors affecting distributors’ costs. In 2004, the Energy
Authority established a price equalizing mechanism intended to
minimize the effects of a timing discrepancy in the setting of
prices distributors pay to the Single Buyer for electricity to
be distributed on the regulated market and the prices that
distributors may charge to end users on the regulated market.
The prices distributors pay to the Single Buyer for electricity
to be distributed on the regulated market are set monthly by the
Energy Authority based on the average unit costs incurred by the
Single Buyer in connection with its purchases of electricity.
However, the generation component included in the overall tariff
that distributors may charge to end users on the regulated
market is fixed by the Energy Authority on a quarterly basis. In
order to minimize the effects of this discrepancy, the Energy
Authority has established a price equalizing mechanism
applicable for the first time in 2004. The equalizing mechanism
is funded through a system charge in an amount set by the Energy
Authority, applicable in 2005.
In 2004, the Energy Authority also put in place a system to
compensate distributors that serve areas where costs are
significantly higher than the national average due to
uncontrollable factors such as population density and geography.
The costs to be considered in setting this compensation are to
be based on infrastructural elements such as the length of
cables and installation type (aerial or underground). The
compensation system does not apply to Enel Distribuzione.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS — (Continued)
Increased Competition
For many years the Company has had virtually no competition in
the generation, transmission and distribution of electricity
market in Italy. The Company currently faces competition from
independent power producers and municipal utilities in
generation.
In addition, the disposal of its generating capacity has exposed
the Company to increasing competition from other operators of
electricity generating capacity, including Italian and
international power companies. The Company also faces
competition from suppliers and wholesalers for sales to
customers that are intensive users of electricity and may freely
purchase electricity from different producers.
In addition to the introduction on April 1, 2004, of
trading on the Italian power exchange, the Company expects that
competition will increase further due to:
•
An increase in bilateral contracts between its competitors and
final customers;
•
Regulations limiting each operator’s access to
international electricity sources to a maximum percentage of
available interconnection capacity; and
•
The construction of new generation facilities by its competitors
and the development of new interconnection lines that would
increase the volume of electricity that may be imported in Italy.
(3)
CHANGES IN THE SCOPE OF CONSOLIDATION
Compared with 2004, the scope of consolidation has changed
primarily as a result of the following operations:
•
the sale of NewReal (real estate sector) on July 14, 2004;
•
the acquisition of controlling investments in Ottogas Rete and
Ottogas Vendita (distribution and sale of natural gas to
end-users) on September 15, 2004;
•
the acquisition of controlling investments in Italgestioni and
Italgestioni Gas (distribution and sale of natural gas to
end-users) on December 14, 2004;
•
the acquisition of controlling investments in Electrica Banat
and Electrica Dobrogea (electricity distribution and sales in
Romania) on April 28, 2005;
•
the disposal of 62.75% of Wind on August 11, 2005 and its
deconsolidation, with the reclassification of the remaining
stake of 37.25% under non-current financial assets;
•
the disposal of 43.85% of Terna and its deconsolidation as from
September 15, 2005.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS — (Continued)
As regards the acquisition of 51% of Electrica Banat and
Electrica Dobrogea, the overall value of the operation amounted
to euro 131 million of which euro 51 million
as price paid for an interest of 24.5% and
euro 80 million was paid as a capital increase to
bring the Company’s share to 51%. The following table
reports the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the
acquisition date.
(Millions of euro)
Property, plant and equipment
305
Intangible assets
3
Trade receivables and inventories
57
Cash and cash equivalents and other current assets
133
Total assets
498
Trade payables
(61
)
Other financial liabilities and other current liabilities
(91
)
Other provisions and other payables
(191
)
Total liabilities
(343
)
Total net assets acquired
155
Negative goodwill
(24
)
Total consideration paid and capital increase at the
acquisition date
131
of which to current financial liabilities
(15
)
CASH FLOW AT THE ACQUISITION DATE
116
The negative goodwill of euro 24 million was
recognized to the income statement for 2005.
(4)
SEGMENT INFORMATION
In 2005 and 2004, the Company’s operations were organized
into six business segments: Generation and Energy Management;
Sales, Infrastructure and Networks; Transmission;
Telecommunications; Services and Other Activities; and
Corporate. Each of these segments constituted a reportable
segment. Transmission and Telecommunications reportable segments
are treated as discontinued operations following the
deconsolidation of Terna and Wind.
At the end of 2005 the Company re-organized its internal
structure into the following business segments: Generation and
Energy Management Division, Market Division, Infrastructure and
Networks Division and the International Division, Corporate and
Services and Other Activities. Such reorganization will be
effective from January 1, 2006.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS — (Continued)
The following table reconciles the segment assets and
liabilities to the consolidated figures.
2005
2004
(millions of euro)
Total assets (consolidated financial statements)
50,502
65,378
Non-current financial assets
2,601
358
Current financial assets
156
57
Cash and cash equivalents
476
331
Tax receivables
3,416
6,314
Sector assets
43,853
58,318
— of which:
Generation and Energy Management
19,622
18,882
Sales, Infrastructure and Networks
23,154
20,806
Other Activities
2,927
3,510
Corporate, eliminations and adjustments
(1,850
)
(2,405
)
Telecommunications and Transmission
—
17,525
Total liabilities (consolidated financial statements)
31,086
46,312
Non-current financial liabilities
262
377
Current financial liabilities
294
463
Long and short-term loans
13,262
26,905
Tax liabilities
2,898
3,118
Sector liabilities
14,370
15,449
— of which:
Generation and Energy Management
4,247
3,491
Sales, Infrastructure and Networks
9,298
8,285
Other Activities
2,377
3,981
Corporate, eliminations and adjustments
(1,552
)
(3,060
)
Telecommunications and Transmission
—
2,752
(5)
DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
2005
2004
2005-2004
(millions of euro)
Operating revenues
3,253
5,439
(2,186
)
Operating expenses
(2,681
)
(6,557
)
3,876
Operating income (losses)
572
(1,118
)
1,690
Net financial expense
(240
)
(467
)
227
Income taxes
(213
)
618
(831
)
Net income before capital gains
119
(967
)
1,086
Gains on disposal of assets, net of taxes
1,153
812
341
NET INCOME FROM DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
1,272
(155
)
1,427
Following the disposal of investments in Wind and Terna, which
took place on August 11, 2005 and September 15, 2005
respectively, these entities were deconsolidated as from those
dates and the financial performance achieved up to the disposal
date is reported under discontinued operations.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS — (Continued)
The capital gains for 2005 were primarily produced by the
disposal of 43.85% of Terna, while the gain in 2004 regards the
sale of 50% of Terna.
The following table reports the cash flow generated by the
disposal of the Transmission and Telecommunications sectors, now
considered discontinued operations, equal to
euro 4,456 million.
2005
(millions
of euro)
Property, plant and equipment, igoodwill and other intangible
assets
(13,922
)
Other non-current assets (net)
543
Inventories and trade receivables
(1,739
)
Cash and cash equivalents
(413
)
Other current assets (net)
448
Trade payables, other provisions and other payables
2,540
Gross financial debt
8,839
Net assets sold
(3,704
)
Gross cash flow
(4,869
)
Cash and cash equivalents
413
Net cash flow
(4,456
)
(6)
OPERATING REVENUES
(6.a) Revenues from sales and services — euro
32,272 million
2005
2004
2005-2004
(millions of euro)
Revenues from the sale and transport of electricity and
contributions from Electricity Equalization Fund
29,008
25,098
3,910
Revenues from the sale and transport of natural gas to end-users
1,556
1,374
182
Revenues from fuel sales
446
894
(448
)
Connection fees for the electricity and gas networks
Net income (charges) from commodity risk management
272
(16
)
288
Total
32,272
28,658
3,614
The change between “Revenues from the sale and transport of
electricity and contributions from Electricity Equalization
Fund” in 2005 and those of the corresponding period of 2004
is partly due to the
start-up, on
April 1, 2004, of the Electricity Power Exchange and to the
market operations of the Single Buyer, which generated an
increase both in revenues and in electricity purchase costs.
Until March 31, 2004, the electricity was sold directly
from the generating companies to the distribution companies of
the Group, and the associated costs and revenues were eliminated
in the consolidated accounts. The results for 2005 also reflect
an increase in revenues from international activities, both from
international trading and from the generation and distribution
activities. Electrica Banat and Electrica Dobrogea, two Romanian
companies that the Company acquired at the end of April 2005,
produced revenues amounting to
€298 million.
The revenues from the Electricity Equalization Fund also include
a
€100 million
reimbursement of the charges incurred for green certificates in
2002 and 2003.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS — (Continued)
Our “revenues from sales of natural gas to end users”
(which exclude sales of gas to distributors and to other third
parties by Enel Trade, which are recorded in “Other
revenues”) increased by euro 182 million. This
increase was largely due to increased tariffs reflecting
increased market prices for natural gas.
“Revenues from fees for customer connections”,
inspections and repositioning services decreased slightly, by
euro 1 million from 2004.
“Revenues from contract work in progress” declined by
euro 319 million as a result of lower engineering and
construction activities.
“Net income (charges) from commodity risk
management” relate mainly to the valuation at fair value of
contracts for differences entered with the Single Buyer at the
end of 2004 and in 2005.
NET INCOME (CHARGES) FROM COMMODITY RISK MANAGEMENT
272
(16
)
288
“Realized charges” include euro 110 million
in respect of currency exchange rate hedges, the fair value of
which was recognized in the previous financial year in a
specific cash flow hedge reserve.
(6.b) Other revenues — euro
1,787 million
2005
2004
2005-2004
(millions of euro)
Prior-year’ regulatory items
338
—
338
Stranded costs
158
1,219
(1,061
)
Gains on sale of equity investments
131
13
118
Bonus for service continuity
115
250
(135
)
Other
1,045
871
174
Total
1,787
2,353
(566
)
“Other revenues” include income on prior-year
regulatory items amounting to euro 338 million
relating to reserve services provided to the Gestore della Rete
(or GRTN). The item also includes euro 158 million in
income from reimbursements paid to the Company for the extra
expenses incurred in relation to Nigerian gas (euro
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS — (Continued)
151 million in 2004). The net change in the year is
primarily the reflection of the recognition in 2004 of
euro 1,068 million related to the overall amount of
the stranded costs that the Company has been entitled to recover
as set by the Ministry for Productive Activities in a Decree
issued on August 6, 2004.
The following table reports the breakdown of revenues by
geographic area:
2005
2004
2005-2004
(millions of euro)
Italy
32,252
29,233
3,019
Europe
1,656
1,549
107
Middle East
27
56
(29
)
Americas
117
160
(43
)
Others
7
13
(6
)
Total
34,059
31,011
3,048
(7)
OPERATING EXPENSES
(7.a) Raw materials and consumables — euro
20,633 million
2005
2004
2005-2004
(millions of euro)
Electricity purchases
14,321
10,380
3,941
Fuel and gas purchases
5,514
5,393
121
Materials purchases
798
1,027
(229
)
Total
20,633
16,800
3,833
of which capitalized
(665
)
(673
)
(8
)
The growth in “Electricity purchases” is partly due to
the start of operation of the Power Exchange on April 1,2004 and the Single Buyer’s activity, as well as an
increase in the average unit price.
“Materials purchases” decreased in line with lower
engineering and contracting activities.
(7.b) Services and rentals — euro
3,057 million
2005
2004
2005-2004
(millions of euro)
Electricity transport
1,048
1,068
(20
)
Maintenance and repairs
395
347
48
Telephone and postal
144
133
11
Services by deconsolidated companies
127
213
(86
)
Services and tenders for contract work in progress
120
260
(140
)
Advertising and publications
62
63
(1
)
Leases and rentals
387
349
38
Other
774
673
101
Total
3,057
3,106
(49
)
Costs in respect of “Services and Rentals” declined by
euro 49 million, essentially due to lower costs of
engineering and construction services (-euro 140 million),
partly offset by higher lease expenses due to the disposal of
the Company’s real estate operations in July 2004.
Excluding future disposals, the estimated payment under the
Company’s rent commitments for the next five years is
approximately euro 370 million.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS — (Continued)
Services by deconsolidated companies includes
euro 111 million (euro 184 million in 2004) of
telecommunication and internet services provided by Wind
Telecomunicazioni to the other Group companies and
euro 16 million (euro 29 million in 2004) of
energy transportation fee recognized to Terna during the year.
Such costs are not eliminated in consolidation since Wind
Telecomunicazioni and Terna are presented as discountinued
operations.
(7.c) Personnel — euro 2,762 million
2005
2004
2005-2004
(millions of euro)
Wages and salaries
1,957
1,989
(32
)
Social security contributions
529
537
(8
)
Termination benefits
111
97
14
Other costs
165
601
(436
)
Total
2,762
3,224
(462
)
Of which capitalized
(384
)
(300
)
84
The decrease in personnel expenses compared with the previous
year is mainly the result of a reduction in the expenses
associated with the payment of early-retirement incentives and a
decline in the average size of the workforce in the year. Other
costs which include charges for the stock option plans for 2005
of euro 11 million (euro 10 million in 2004),
decreased mainly as a result of a euro 361 million
decrease in early retirement incentives granted in 2005.
The following table shows the average number of employees by
category, compared with the previous year and the actual number
of employees at December 31, 2005.
(7.d) Depreciation, amortization and impairment
losses — euro 2,207 million
2005
2004
2005-2004
(millions of euro)
Depreciation of property, plant and equipment
1,918
1,990
(72
)
Amortization of intangible assets
138
121
17
Impairment losses
151
90
61
Total
2,207
2,201
6
The item “Depreciation of property plant and
equipment” shows a decline of euro 72 million, mainly
due to a reassessment of the useful remaining life of power
plants, as explained in notes 1 and 12.a.
The increase of euro 61 million in “Impairment
losses” reflects the changes made to recognized trade
receivables in line with the present value of their estimated
future cash flows.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS — (Continued)
(7.e) Other operating expenses — euro
911 million
2005
2004
2005-2004
(millions of euro)
Provisions for risks and charges
212
203
9
Purchase of green certificates
119
104
15
Charges for CO
2
emissions
228
—
228
Taxes and duties
144
158
(14
)
Other
208
318
(110
)
Total
911
783
128
The increase of euro 128 million in “Other
operating expenses” relates mostly to charges estimated at
euro 228 million for emissions in excess of the
assigned allowances, partially offset by higher other expenses
recorded in the prior financial year.
(7.f) Capitalized expenses — euro
(1,049) million
2005
2004
2005-2004
(millions of euro)
Personnel
(384
)
(300
)
84
Materials
(665
)
(673
)
(8
)
Total
(1,049
)
(973
)
76
The item shows an increase of euro 76 million as
result of an expansion in the amount of internal construction of
plants, primarily in the Infrastructure and Networks Division.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS — (Continued)
(8)
FINANCIAL INCOME (EXPENSE) AND INCOME (EXPENSE) FROM
INVESTMENTS — EURO (714) MILLION
2005
2004
2005-2004
(millions of euro)
Financial income:
— interest and other income from non-current financial
assets
29
49
(20
)
— foreign exchange gains
23
165
(142
)
— income realized from derivative instruments
13
16
(3
)
— income unrealized from derivative instruments
55
13
42
— other income
99
118
(19
)
Total income
219
361
(142
)
Financial expense:
— interest and other charges on financial debt
(686
)
(771
)
85
— foreign exchange losses
(52
)
(143
)
91
— expense realized on derivative instruments
(75
)
(122
)
47
— expense unrealized on derivative instruments
(19
)
(13
)
(6
)
— accretion of post-employment and other employee
benefits
(112
)
(134
)
22
Total financial expense
(944
)
(1,183
)
239
Total financial income (expense)
(725
)
(822
)
97
Income (expense) from investments:
— income from investments
11
4
7
— expense on investments
—
(9
)
9
Total income (expense) from investments
11
(5
)
16
TOTAL
(714
)
(827
)
113
Net financial charges declined by euro 97 million
(from euro 822 million in 2004 to
euro 725 million in 2005), due partially to the
reduction in the average debt for the year.
(9)
INCOME (EXPENSE) FROM INVESTMENTS ACCOUNTED FOR USING THE
EQUITY METHOD — EURO (30) MILLION
2005
2004
2005-2004
(millions of euro)
Income from associates
7
8
(1
)
Expense on associates
(37
)
(33
)
(4
)
Total
(30
)
(25
)
(5
)
(10)
INCOME TAXES — EURO 1,934 MILLION
2005
2004
2005-2004
(millions of euro)
Current taxes
1,398
1,328
70
Difference on estimated income taxes from prior years
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS — (Continued)
Estimated taxes on income from continuing operations for 2005
amount to euro 1,934 million, which corresponds to 40.3% of
income before tax. In 2004, income taxes totaled
euro 2,116 million, or 42.2% of income before tax.
Foreign taxes in 2005 totaled euro 43 million (euro
22 million in 2004). The table below reconciles the
theoretical tax rate with the effective rate.
2005
2004
(millions of euro)
Income before taxes
4,794
5,018
Theoretical tax due calculated as 33% of pre-tax income
1,582
33.0
%
1,656
33.0
%
Permanent differences and minor items
(12
)
(0.3
)%
103
2.1
%
Difference on estimated income taxes from prior years
Raw materials, consumables and supplies consist of fuel
inventories to cover the company’s requirements for
generation and trading activities, as well as materials and
equipment for plant operation, maintenance and construction.
The decrease in other inventories of raw materials, consumables
and supplies is primarily attributable to the use of materials
for the construction and maintenance of distribution networks
(euro 282 million).
Buildings available for sale relate to the Company’s
residual property assets, most of them intended for civil use.
The decrease reflects the sales made during the year.
At December 31, 2004, finished products inventories
included Wind’s telephone equipment held for resale.
The increase in trade receivables mainly reflects the rise in
receivables for the sale and transport of electricity and gas
and the consolidation of the Romanian distribution companies,
net of the impact from the deconsolidation of Wind and Terna.
Trade receivables due from customers are recognized net of the
related provision for doubtful accounts, which amounted to
euro 347 million at the end of 2005, compared with an
opening balance of euro 486 million (which included
euro 305 million relating to Transmission and
Telecommunications sectors). The table below sets out the
changes to the provision in 2005.
include euro 151 million in respect of
Telecommunication and Transmission sectors.
(**)
include euro 37 million in respect of
Telecommunication and Transmission sectors until date of
deconsolidation.
(11.c) Tax receivables — euro
789 million
Tax receivables at December 31, 2005 totaled
euro 789 million and relate primarily to receivables
in respect of direct taxes of euro 568 million. The
amount includes euro 488 million in IRES tax credits
arising from the application of the national tax consolidation
mechanism, which will be realized by offsetting tax payables in
2006.
The euro 17 million decrease in receivables for
factoring advances is mainly due to a reduction in the amounts
discounted by suppliers, associated in part by a decline in
trade payables.
The following tables show the notional values and the fair value
of the derivative contracts, grouped by hedge type and
designation:
two-way contracts for differences, with a notional value of
euro 1,372 million (euro 5,133 million in 2004)
and a fair value of euro 57 million (nil at
December 31, 2004);
•
one-way contracts for differences, with a notional value of
euro 6,266 million and a fair value of
euro 43 million (not entered into 2004);
•
derivatives on fuels, energy and metals with a notional value of
euro 913 million (euro 557 million in 2004) and a
fair value of euro 5 million (euro 14 million in
2004).
Investments entirely consist of the company’s 1.02%
interest in Terna in respect of the bonus shares granted to
Terna shareholders.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS — (Continued)
(11.e) Cash and cash equivalents — euro
476 million
Cash and cash equivalents, detailed in the table below, are not
restricted by any encumbrances, apart from
euro 24 million primarily in respect of deposits
pledged to secure transactions carried out by Enel North America.
Short-term receivables from the Electricity Equalization Fund at
the end of the financial year amounted to
euro 816 million, which includes
euro 169 million in reimbursements for stranded costs
which the Company expects to receive in 2006.
Including the portion of receivables classified as long-term
(euro 847 million), total receivables due from the
Electricity Equalization Fund amount to
euro 1,663 million.
(12)
NON-CURRENT ASSETS
(12.a) Property, plant and equipment — euro
30,188 million
Developments in property, plant and equipment in 2004 and 2005
are shown below:
Include euro 643 million (euro 1,004 million in
2004) in respect of Telecommunication and Transmission sectors
until date of deconsolidation.
Property, plant and equipment includes assets to be relinquished
with a net book value of euro 2,772 million, mainly
hydroelectric power plants (euro 2,722 million).
Changes in the scope of consolidation in 2005 relate to the
following transactions:
•
deconsolidation of Transmission and Telecommunications sectors
following the sale in 2005 of the Company’s majority stakes
in Terna and Wind (euro 7,823 million);
•
acquisition of Electrica Banat and Electrica Dobrogea (euro
305 million);
•
acquisition of new companies in the United States (euro
35 million);
•
acquisition of Metanodotti Padani and Metanodotti Trentini (euro
25 million).
With reference to depreciation, in 2005, the remaining useful
life of power plants in Italy was re-assessed, taking into
consideration their expected future use after planned changes in
the production functions of the Company’s generation
facilities have been put into effect. Following an independent
appraisal, the expected useful life of certain plants was
lengthened with respect to the previous year, while that of
others was shortened. The net effect of the reassessments is a
reduction in depreciation charges of about euro
100 million, gross of the related tax effect.
The increase in the item “ordinary disposals and other
changes” is primarily attributable to the reclassification
of materials for the construction and maintenance of the
distribution network that had previously been classified as
inventory and the Immobiliare Foro Bonaparte’s spin-off
which contributed land and buildings to Dalmazia Trieste.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS — (Continued)
The following table shows the gross values at December 31,2004 and December 31, 2005 of property, plant and
equipment, the related accumulated depreciation and the net
values resulting therefrom, as well as a classification of the
assets by category of use.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS — (Continued)
The table below summarizes capital expenditures by category. The
total of euro 3,037 million is lower than in 2004 (euro
501 million), primarily due to the removal of Wind and
Terna from the scope of consolidation.
2005
2004
2005-2004
(millions of euro)
Power plants:
— thermal
570
455
115
— hydro
206
188
18
— geothermal
84
55
29
— alternative energy resources
130
122
8
Total power plants
990
820
170
Transport lines and transformer stations
133
267
(134
)
Electricity distribution networks
1,381
1,435
(54
)
Gas distribution networks
70
80
(10
)
Telecommunication networks
251
680
(429
)
Land, buildings and other assets and equipment
212
256
(44
)
TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURE
3,037
3,538
(501
)
Investments in power plants in Italy amounted to
euro 768 million in 2005, an increase of
euro 124 million compared with the previous year. The
expenditure primarily refers to works for the transformation of
thermal plants and plant upgrading and repowering to enhance
safety and environmental performance (upgrading of hydraulic
plant, environmental impact work, etc.).
Investments in the electricity distribution network amounted to
euro 1,381 million, a reduction of
euro 54 million with respect to the previous year. The
expenditure mainly relates to the on going remote metering
project in which traditional meters are replaced with digital
meters, with approximately 6.2 million new installations
(about 7.4 million in 2004). Since the program began, a
total of 27 million digital meters have been installed.
Enel has asset retirement obligations associated with a
geothermal power plant as well as a certain property owned by
the State. Enel’s obligations relate to the return on
expiration of the license or authorization of such assets to the
State in same condition as originally conveyed.
Below is a reconciliation of the beginning and ending aggregate
carrying amount of asset retirement obligations for the year
ended December 31, 2005. The decrease in the liabilities is
related to Wind’s asset retirement obligation to dismantle
antenna sites and return them to their original condition. The
liabilities were disposed in connection with sale and subsequent
deconsolidation of Wind.
Regarding Enel’s other geothermal plants, generally, the
license or authorization is renewed, and no historical
experience exists of discontinuing a license or authorization.
The Company does not have sufficient information available to
estimate a range of potential settlement dates in which asset
retirement obligations relating to these plants will be
incurred. The liability will be initially recognized in the
period in which sufficient
Industrial patents and intellectual property rights
411
72
59
—
(245
)
(149
)
(15
)
133
Concessions, licenses, trademarks and other similar rights
2,526
36
—
1
(2,410
)
(96
)
20
77
Assets under development and advances
174
97
(68
)
—
(70
)
—
(1
)
132
Other:
— software development
126
11
9
—
—
(52
)
11
105
— other
119
1
—
9
26
(11
)
16
160
Total other
245
12
9
9
26
(63
)
27
265
Goodwill
6,709
3
—
23
(5,120
)
—
(40
)
1,575
TOTAL
10,071
220
—
33
(7,819
)
(308
)
(15
)
2,182
(1)
Includes euro 170 million (euro 328 million in
2004) in respect of Telecommunications and Transmission sectors
until date of deconsolidation.
“Industrial patents and intellectual property rights”
relate mainly to costs incurred in purchasing software and
open-ended software licenses. The most important applications
relate to invoicing and customer management, the development of
Internet portals and the management of company systems.
Amortization is calculated on a straight-line basis over the
residual useful life (on average between three and five years).
“Concessions, licenses, trademarks and similar rights”
include expenses incurred by the gas companies and the foreign
electricity distribution companies to build up their customer
base. The change in the scope of
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS — (Continued)
consolidation refers to the removal of Wind. Amortization is
calculated on a straight-line basis over the term of the average
period of the relation with customers or of the concessions.
Costs for “Software development” relate to
applications in use developed for long-term internal deployment.
They are amortized over three years.
“Goodwill” amounted to euro 1,575 million
(euro 6,709 million in 2004). The change in the scope of
consolidation refers entirely to the disposal of the controlling
stake in Wind. Exchange rate differences relate to the goodwill
in Enel North America and Enel Latin America expressed in a
functional currency other than the euro. Other changes include
in 2004 the impairment on Wind goodwill (euro
1,671 million).
The recoverable amount of the goodwill recognized in the
financial statements is estimated using the discounted cash flow
model and the dividend discount model. To determine the value in
use of an asset, the future cash flows are estimated and a
suitable discount rate applied. Specifically, cash flows are
projected over an explicit period that is compatible with the
average residual useful life of the asset or the residual term
of concession. Where it has not been possible to estimate cash
flows for the residual useful life of the cash generating unit,
the residual value has been estimated by assuming a perpetuity
with a nominal growth rate of zero or equal to the rate of
inflation expected for the relevant country. As the recoverable
amount of a cash generating unit, calculated as described above,
is substantially higher than its book value, modifications in
the assumptions used to determine the recoverable amount do not
have any significant impact on the cash generating unit carrying
value.
The table below reports the balances according to the company
that generated them, along with the rates applied and the time
horizon over which the expected inflows are discounted.
Impairment of property, plant and equipment and intangible assets
83
5
(1
)
(19
)
68
Accruals to provisions for risks and charges and impairment
losses with deferred deductibility
995
(251
)
11
(188
)
567
Tax losses carried forward
845
(86
)
(2
)
(632
)
125
Measurement of financial assets
164
(11
)
36
(37
)
152
Other items
866
23
5
(28
)
866
Total
2,953
(320
)
49
(904
)
1,778
(1)
Includes a reduction of euro 43 million relating to
Telecommunications and Transmission sectors assets until date of
deconsolidation.
Changes in deferred tax assets derive mainly from:
•
the recognition of the deductible share for 2005 (euro
247 million) referring to previous years impairments of
investments on which tax deductibility was deferred over more
than one year;
•
a net decrease (euro 86 million) attributable mainly to
Wind’s tax losses carried forward until the date of its
removal from the scope of consolidation;
•
change in the scope of consolidation essentially attributable to
the deconsolidation of Wind (euro 852 million).
Other changes essentially consist of the tax effect recognized
directly in equity and the measurement of hedging instruments
and other financial assets at fair value (euro 36 million).
No deferred tax assets were recorded in relation to the prior
tax losses of two holding companies located in the Netherlands
and Luxembourg (euro 660 million), because the tax laws in
force in the countries in question do not treat the expected
income (dividends) of the companies as taxable.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS — (Continued)
Investment in other companies are measured at fair value, if it
can be determined, or at acquisition cost if not. For listed
companies, the fair value is determined by the market value of
their shares at the end of the financial period. The fair value
of unlisted companies is determined by a valuation of their
significant assets.
The increase of euro 525 million derives from the
investments of 5.1% of Terna and 5.2% of Weather Investments. An
additional 1.02% investment in Terna is classified as current
asset in order to satisfy the obligation of the bonus share
granted to the participants in the public offering of Terna in
June 2004.
Non-current financial assets also include a deposit made for the
acquisition of 66% of the share capital of Slovenské
Elektrįrne. The price for the acquisition, taking account
of the fair value of the company’s assets, was set at
euro 840 million, against which Enel made the initial
deposit. The acquisition is expected to be completed by the end
of the first half of 2006.
“Financial receivables due from financing entities”
show a fall of euro 1,568 million as a result of the
reimbursement of a security deposit repayable to Enel SpA by a
leading Italian financial institution. The deposit had been
established in 2003 as part of the renegotiation of a credit
line of euro 1,500 million disbursed to Wind in 2001.
The following tables show the notional amounts and the fair
value of derivative contracts, classified under non-current
financial assets:
The fair value interest rate hedges, whose notional value
amounted to euro 1,200 million at December 31,2004, related to a hedge of fixed-rate debt issued by Terna.
Tax receivables falling due at more than 12 months
—
16
(16
)
Receivables from Electricity Equalization Fund
847
—
847
Other long-term receivables:
— advances to suppliers
6
2
4
— tax paid on account on employee termination
indemnities
19
33
(14
)
— security deposits
—
5
(5
)
— loans to employees
44
52
(8
)
— other receivables
59
46
13
Total
128
138
(10
)
TOTAL
975
154
821
Receivables from the Electricity Equalization Fund consist of
the stranded costs portion receivable after December 31,2006, for which the Company has been entitled to receive a
compensation for unrecoverable electricity generation costs and
for the additional charges relating to natural gas imported from
Nigeria.
Liabilities
(13) CURRENT LIABILITIES
(13.a) Short-term loans — euro
1,361 million
At December 31, 2005, short-term loans totaled
euro 1,361 million, a decrease of
euro 3,831 million with respect to December 31,2004, as detailed below.
The Company maintains committed revolving lines of credit with
maximum borrowing limits aggregating
euro 6,325 million and uncommitted lines of credit and
other short-term borrowing agreements with banks with maximum
borrowing limits aggregating approximately
euro 3,368 million as of December 31, 2005. These
agreements provide for interest charges based on prevailing
market conditions. As of December 31, 2005 and 2004, the
average interest rate on short-term borrowings was 2.51% and
2.21%, respectively.
As of December 31, 2005 and 2004,
euro 970 million and euro 2,560 million,
respectively, in borrowings from banks were outstanding.
Short-term bank debt includes the use of revolving credit lines
of euro 0 million and euro 400 million as of
December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
In November 2005, we entered into a new five year revolving line
of credit for euro 5,000 million, substituting the
previous line for euro 3,000 million (of which
euro 2 billion was available for five years and
euro 1 billion expired in 2004). As of
December 31, 2005 the new line, which is available on a
revolving basis
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS — (Continued)
until December 2010 with two extension options of one year each
at the end of year five and year six, taking the maximum
possible tenor of the facility to 7 years, had not been
utilized.
Payables represented by commercial paper relate to issues at
year-end in the context of the euro 1,500 million
program launched in 2001 by Enel Investment Holding and
guaranteed by Enel SpA, the maximum amount of which was raised
to euro 2,500 million in May 2004. In November 2005,
the ceiling amount was raised to euro 4,000 million
and the issuer of the commercial paper was changed from Enel
Investment Holding to Enel Finance International, with Enel SpA
retaining its responsibility as guarantor. At December 31,2005, issues under the program totaled
euro 275 million. The notional value of the commercial
paper is euro 276 million, and is denominated in euro
(euro 240 million) and pounds sterling (the equivalent of
euro 36 million). The exchange rate risk is hedged
through currency swaps derivative contracts.
(13.b) Trade payables — euro
6,610 million
Trade payables amount to euro 6,610 million, with a
decrease of euro 208 million compared with
December 31, 2004. They include payables for the supply of
electricity, fuel, materials and equipment for tenders and
sundry services. The decrease mainly reflects the removal of
Wind and Terna from the scope of consolidation. This was partly
offset by the increase in payables for electricity purchases by
the Sales, Infrastructure and Networks Divisions.
(13.c) Current financial liabilities — euro
294 million
Trading derivatives in interest and exchange rates primarily
include transactions entered into for hedging purposes, but
which do not qualify for hedge accounting under IFRS-EU. Trading
derivatives in commodities, not held for speculative purposes,
primarily relate to fuel and energy trading activities and, at
December 31, 2005,
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS — (Continued)
showed a net notional value of euro 125 million (euro
18 million at December 31, 2004) and a fair value of
euro 13 million (euro 12 million at
December 31, 2004).
(13.d) Other current liabilities — euro
4,218 million
Payables due to customers for security deposits and
reimbursements
1,755
1,728
27
Other
1,240
1,496
(256
)
Total
4,218
4,608
(390
)
Payables to the Electricity Equalization Fund amounted to
euro 406 million, a decline of
euro 106 million compared with December 31, 2004.
Payables to customers for security deposits refer to amounts
received from customers under the terms of contracts for the
delivery of electricity which, upon the finalization of
contracts, are booked as current liabilities because the company
does not have an unconditional right to defer the repayment of
the liabilities beyond twelve months.
(14)
NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES
(14.a) Long-term loans (including the current
portions) — euro 11,902 million
The aggregate includes long-term payables in respect of bonds,
bank loans and other loans in euro and other currencies,
including the portion falling due within twelve months.
The long-term debt at December 31, 2005 includes
euro 1,370 million in bonds guaranteed by the Italian
government (euro 1,412 million at end of 2004) and bank
loans guaranteed by the Italian government amounting to
euro 91 million (euro 133 million at end-2004).
The balance of bonds is net of euro 527 million in
bonds held in portfolio. Specifically, the Parent Company holds
unlisted floating-rate bonds (“Special series reserved for
employees 1994-2019”) amounting to
euro 492 million, while Enel.Re holds bonds issued by
Enel SpA totalling euro 35 million.
Long term financial debt by currency and interest rate
Compared with December 31, 2004, the notional value of
long-term debt decreased by euro 9,843 million, of
which a decrease of euro 3,658 million from
repayments, an increase of euro 1,759 million from new
financing, a decrease of euro 8,106 million from changes in
the scope of consolidation and a decrease of euro
162 million from negative exchange rate differences (of
which euro 125 million in respect of the debt in
Brazilian reals of TSN and Novatrans, two Brazilian subsidiaries
of Terna that as of December 2005 are no longer consolidated).
The reduction in long-term debt is mainly attributable to the
receipts from the sale of 62.75% of Wind to Weather and the sale
of 43.85% of Terna SpA, and the consequent deconsolidation of
the two companies’ debt.
Among the important financial transactions in the year was the
issue, on March 10, 2005, of two seven-year bonds of
euro 400 million and euro 600 million to
Italian retail investors. The terms are set out in the table
below:
On November 15, 2005 a new Medium Term Notes Program
was established, leaving the debt ceiling unchanged at
euro 10 billion. The new structure of the
foreign-registered holding companies prompted the Company to
replace Enel Investment Holding with Enel Finance International
as the second issuer for the Medium Term Notes Program.
The main repayments in the year relate to Enel SpA’s
decreased use of its
36-month revolving
credit lines and other maturing loans for
euro 1,330 million.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS — (Continued)
The following table compares the book value and the fair value
of long-term debt, including the portion falling due within
twelve months, for each category.
At December 31, 2005, 50% of the net financial debt paid
floating interest rates. Taking account of cash flow hedges
considered effective, the Company’s exposure to interest
rate risk at December 31, 2005 was 23%. Considering the
existing derivative contracts an interest rate increase of ten
basis points would generate an estimated annual increase in
financial expense of approximately euro 2 million.
(14.b) Post-employment and other employee
benefits — euro 2,662 million
The Company offers its employees a variety of benefits,
including termination benefits, additional months’ pay, and
similar benefits, loyalty bonuses, a supplementary pension plan,
a healthcare plan and electricity discounts which consist of the
following:
Termination benefits
Under Italian law, upon the termination of an employment
relationship, the former employee has the right to receive
termination benefits for each year of service equal to the
employee’s gross annual salary, divided by 13.5. The
entitlement is increased each year by an amount corresponding to
75% of the rise in the
cost-of-living index
plus 1.5 points.
Additional months’ pay and similar benefits
In accordance with the national collective bargaining agreement
for workers in the electricity industry, workers hired up to
July 2001 and managers hired or appointed until 1999 who leave
the company after reaching the maximum working age or after
accruing sufficient seniority to be eligible for a pension are
entitled to several additional months pay in addition to their
termination benefits. The benefit is a fixed amount.
Loyalty bonus
The loyalty bonus is awarded to employees hired under the
national collective bargaining agreement for workers in the
electricity industry who have reached specified seniority levels
in the company (25 and 35 years of service). The bonus is
calculated on the basis of the gross monthly wage at the date
and it is equal to one third of the monthly wage for employees
with seniority of 25 years and an entire month’s pay
for employees with seniority of 35 years.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS — (Continued)
Company supplementary pension plan
The company supplementary pension plan is provided to a number
of senior managers who retired before March 31, 1998. Under
this plan, the former managers receive a supplementary pension
in addition to that to which they are entitled by law. This
liability only changes as a result of payment of benefits and
changes in the actuarial parameters used.
Healthcare plan
Under the national collective bargaining agreement for
industrial managers, managers are entitled to supplementary
healthcare protection in addition to that provided by the
National Health Service, both while in service and after
retirement. Reimbursements for supplementary health services for
Enel Group managers are paid by Asem, a healthcare fund
specifically set up for managers of companies operating in the
Italian electricity industry.
Electricity discounts
The national collective bargaining agreement for electricity
workers stipulates that employees in service hired before
July 1, 1996 and retired workers shall receive a discount
on the cost of electricity supplied for domestic use up to a
specified annual level of consumption.
Under IAS 19, these obligations are considered
“defined-benefit plans” and are calculated using the
“projected unit credit method”, under which the
liability is calculated in proportion to the service already
provided with respect to the total service expected in the
future.
Enel’s pension plan and post-retirement plan assets, which
solely relate to certain Spanish subsidiaries, are entirely
covered by insurance contracts. Under the terms of the contract,
the annual yield is guaranteed by the insurance company and
investment decisions are the responsibility of the insurance
company.
Benefits due on termination of employment and other long-term
benefits
Benefit obligations at January 1
1,696
1,887
Service cost
83
(1)
90
Interest cost
68
(1)
90
Benefit paid
(229
)
(371
)
Changes in scope of consolidation
(113
)
—
Unrecognized actuarial (gains)/losses in year
(3
)
—
Benefit obligations at December 31
1,502
1,696
Liabilities at December 31
1,505
1,696
Other post employment benefits
Benefit obligations at January 1
1,214
1,137
Service cost
8
(1)
74
Interest cost
49
(1)
54
Benefit paid
(53
)
(51
)
Changes in scope of consolidation
(61
)
—
Unrecognized actuarial (gains)/losses in year
19
—
Benefit obligations at December 31
1,176
1,214
Liabilities at December 31
1,157
1,214
(1)
Includes Telecommunications and Transmission sectors until date
of deconsolidation.
The above liabilities are reported net of plan assets, whose
fair value at period-end amounted to euro 304 million,
including unrecognized actuarial losses of
euro 9 million. The expected return on the plan assets
is equal to 4.2% (5.0% in 2004).
The cost of employee benefits in 2005 came to
euro 257 million (euro 361 million in 2004), of
which euro 117 million in respect of interest cost
(euro 144 million in 2004) and euro 140 million
(euro 217 million in 2004) recognized under personnel costs
(euro 49 million of which refer to benefits paid in 2005).
The main actuarial assumptions used to calculate the liabilities
in respect of employee benefits are as follows:
Provision for litigation, risks and other charges:
— litigation
382
56
(38
)
(59
)
341
— CO
2
emissions charges
—
228
—
—
228
— other
727
171
(134
)
(187
)
577
Total
1,109
455
(172
)
(246
)
1,146
Provision for early-retirement incentives
295
69
(8
)
(235
)
121
TOTAL
1,404
524
(180
)
(481
)
1,267
(1)
Includes euro 15 million in respect of
Telecommunications and Transmission segments until their
deconsolidation.
Litigation
This provision covers contingent liabilities that could arise in
respect of pending litigation and other disputes. It includes an
estimate of the potential liability relating to disputes that
arose during the financial year as well as revised estimates of
the potential costs associated with disputes initiated in prior
periods. The estimates are based on the opinions of internal and
external legal counsel.
Other
Other accruals refer to various risks and charges, mainly in
connection with plant operation and transformation, regulatory
disputes, penalties and other expenses related to engineering
and construction, as well as disputes with local authorities
regarding sundry duties and fees.
Provision for early retirement incentives
The “Provision for early retirement incentives”
includes the estimated charges relating to legal or constructive
obligations for the voluntary termination of employment
contracts in response to restructuring needs that employees have
already signed or are likely to sign.
Includes a postive effect of euro 38 million in
respect of Telecommunications and Transmission segments until
date of deconsolidation.
The heading includes the deferred tax liabilities recognized
from consolidated companies on differences between depreciation
charged for tax purposes, including accelerated depreciation,
and depreciation based on the estimated useful lives of assets,
as well as income subject to deferred taxation. The decrease
related to the change in the scope of consolidation refers
exclusively to the sale of Terna. “Other changes”
relate to the deferred tax effect of the fair value measurement
of financial instruments used for hedging.
(14.e) Non-current financial liabilities — euro
262 million
These consist of the fair value measurement of cash flow hedge
derivatives. The following table shows the related notional
amount and fair value:
Derivatives at December 31, 2005 were mostly composed of
interest rate hedges on a number of long-term floating-rate
loans.
The decrease in the year in both the notional amount and fair
value of the derivatives was essentially the direct consequence
of the deconsolidation of Wind and Terna debt.
(14.f) Other non-current liabilities — euro
18 million
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS — (Continued)
The decrease in payables to Ferrovie dello Stato (Italian State
Railways) compared to the amount at December 31, 2004 is
attributable to the deconsolidation of Wind.
(15)
EQUITY ATTRIBUTABLE TO THE SHAREHOLDERS OF THE PARENT
COMPANY
Equity attributable to the shareholders of the Parent
Company — euro 19,057 million
In 2005, 53,549,782 options that had been distributed under the
stock option plans for 2001, 2002, 2003 and 2004 were exercised.
The exercise of these options generated an increase in equity of
euro 339 million, mainly due to an increase in share
capital of euro 53 million and in the share premium
reserve of euro 286 million.
Share capital — euro 6,157 million
Share capital is represented by 6,157,071,646 ordinary shares
with a par value of euro 1.00 each. Based on the
shareholders register and other available information, at
December 31, 2005 no shareholders held more than 2% of the
total share capital, apart from the Ministry for the Economy and
Finance, which holds 21.4%, and its subsidiary Cassa Depositi e
Prestiti SpA, which holds 10.2%.
Other reserves — euro 4,219 million
Share premium reserve — euro 511 million
The change in the course of the year was attributable to the
exercise of stock options. In addition, as regards the exercised
options, the share premium reserve increased by a further
euro 17 million as a result of the reclassification of
the specific stock option reserve due to exercised options.
Legal reserve — euro 1,453 million
The Legal reserve represents the residual amount of
undistributable earnings restricted from the payment of
dividends pursuant to the Italian Civil Code (the Civil Code).
Under the Civil Code, with respect to income of any year, an
amount equal to 5% of the Company’s and Italian
subsidiaries’ statutory income must be allocated to a legal
reserve until such reserve is equal to one-fifth of the par
value of the Company’s issued and outstanding share
capital. The legal reserve of the Parent represents 24% of its
share capital, consequently a current allocation is not required.
Reserve pursuant to Law — euro
2,215 million
This regards the remaining portion of the value adjustments
carried out when Enel was transformed from a public entity to
limited liabilities company. Pursuant to Article 47 of the
Uniform Tax Code (Testo Unico Imposte sul Reddito), this amount
does not constitute taxable income when distributed.
Foreign currency translation reserve — euro
40 million
The increase in this aggregate in 2005 was attributable to the
appreciation of the Company’s functional currency against
the functional currencies other than the euro used by
subsidiaries.
Retained earnings carried forward — euro
5,953 million
As provided by Italian law, dividends may only be paid out of
the statutory retained earnings, plus its distributable reserves
and statutory net income for the current year, net of the amount
to be allocated to the legal reserve in the subsequent year.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS — (Continued)
Reserve for measurement of financial instruments —
euro 2 million
This item includes euro 132 million in unrealized
gains arising in respect of the fair value measurement of
financial assets, as well as euro 130 million losses
not yet realized at the end of the year in respect of the
measurement of cash flow hedges and recognized directly in
equity.
(16)
RELATED PARTIES
As the entity responsible for electricity generation,
distribution and transport in Italy, we provide services to a
number of other state-owned entities. The rates charged to these
entities are comparable to those charged to other commercial
organizations.
Under the current regulatory framework, we enter into certain
transactions with Terna, the Gestore della Rete, the Single
Buyer and the Market Operator (each of which is wholly owned,
directly or indirectly, by the MEF, the Company’s
controlling shareholder). Fees paid to Terna and certain of the
prices and fees paid to the Market Operator are determined by
the Energy Authority. Transactions entered into with the Market
Operator on the Italian power exchange and with the Single Buyer
are conducted at market prices.
Our Sales, Infrastructure and Networks Division (now Market
Division and Infrastructure and Networks Division) purchased
electricity from the Single Buyer and the Gestore della Rete.
Our Generation and Energy Management Division purchased and sold
electricity from and to the Market Operator on the Italian power
exchange and sold electricity to the Single Buyer.
Since the deconsolidation of Terna as of September 15,2005, we no longer earn revenues from a fee per kWh of
electricity transported that distributors and suppliers pay to
Terna through the Gestore della Rete. Instead, we pay fees to
Terna for the transport of electricity, which are determined by
the Energy Authority. Both our Sales, Infrastructure and
Networks Division and Generation and Energy Management Division
paid fees to Terna for the use of the national electricity
transmission grid.
We purchase fuel for our generation plants and our gas
distribution and sales activities from Eni, an Italian oil and
gas company controlled by the MEF.
The table summarizes the relationships with the State-owned
companies:
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS — (Continued)
With reference to associated companies, Enel incurs costs in
respect of telecommunications services (Wind Telecomunicazioni),
rent and lease payments (IFB, Leasys) and research activities
(Cesi).
All transactions with related parties are concluded on arm
length basis.
In compliance with the Company’s rules of corporate
governance, transactions with related parties are carried out in
accordance with procedural, substantial and fair criteria.
In order to ensure fairness in transactions with related
parties, and to account for the special nature, value or other
characteristics of a given transaction the Board of Directors
may ask independent experts to value the assets involved in the
transaction and provide financial, legal or technical advice.
The following table shows transactions in existence at
December 31, 2005 with affiliated companies and carried out
during the year.
Guarantees granted to third parties at December 31, 2005
amounted to euro 1,244 million and include
euro 744 million in commitments corresponding to the
lease payments related to the office buildings leased back after
the disposal of NewReal on July 1, 2004. In particular, the
rental periods depends on the asset portfolio (six to twenty
years) as well as the related flexibility mechanism which
foresees the allowed releases in a prefixed quota per year.
The estimated cash flows for Enel, after the deconsolidation of
Terna and Wind and including the forecasted inflation effect,
related to those obligations for the period 2006-2010 are as
follows:
•
2006: euro 74 million;
•
2007: euro 74 million;
•
2008: euro 74 million;
•
2009: euro 73 million;
•
2010: euro 68 million.
Commitments for electricity mainly regard imports from France,
Switzerland and Germany, which at December 31, 2005
amounted to euro 4,013 million, of which
euro 3,686 million refers to the period 2006-2010 and
euro 327 million to the period 2011-2015.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS — (Continued)
Commitments for the purchase of fuels are determined with
reference to the parameters and exchange rates applicable at the
end of the financial year (given that fuel prices vary and are
mainly set in foreign currencies). The total at year-end was
euro 51,647 million, and consisted of the following:
Natural Gas
Fuel Oil
Coal
Logistic Services
Total
(millions of euro)
Period:
— 2006-2010
18,209
117
504
236
19,066
— 2011-2015
17,301
—
206
60
17,567
— 2016-2020
13,227
—
207
46
13,480
— 2021 and beyond
1,410
—
124
—
1,534
Total
50,147
117
1,041
342
51,647
(18)
CONTINGENT LIABILITIES AND ASSETS
Litigation on rates
Enel is the target of a series of suits filed by a number of
customers that consume large amounts of electricity and who have
challenged, in full or in part, the legitimacy of the measures
with which first the Interministerial Price Committee
(CIP) and then the Authority for Electricity and Gas
determined changes in electricity rates in the past. To date,
the courts have generally rejected the complaints lodged and an
examination of the rulings would indicate that the chance of
unfavorable judgements is remote.
Environmental litigation
Litigation regarding environmental issues primarily concerns the
installation and operation of power lines and equipment of Enel
Distribuzione, which succeeded Enel in the related relationships.
Enel Distribuzione has been involved in a number of civil and
administrative suits relating to requests for the transfer or
modification of power lines on the basis of their alleged
potential to cause harm, despite the fact that they have been
installed in compliance with current regulations.
In a number of proceedings claims for damages for harm caused by
electromagnetic fields have been lodged. Recourse to legal
action requesting the immediate suspension or modification of
plant operations by residents who live near power lines is
frequent. Nevertheless, the outcome of litigation on these
issues continues to be favorable to Enel, with only sporadic
precautionary rulings against the Company. All of these have
been appealed, so that at the present date there are no final
rulings against Group companies, and no damages for physical
harm have ever been granted.
There have also been a number of proceedings concerning
electromagnetic fields generated by medium- and low-voltage
transformer substations within buildings, in which the equipment
has always been in compliance with induction limits set by
current regulations.
Litigation concerning the effect of electromagnetic fields moved
in Enel’s favor following the entry into force of the
framework law on electromagnetic emissions (Law 36 of
February 22, 2001) and the related implementing regulations
(Prime Minister’s Orders no. 11719 of July 8, 2003 and
no. 11723 of July 8, 2003). The new law seeks to harmonize
regulation of the field at the national level, setting rules
that apply to the entire country and defining exposure limits,
alert thresholds and quality objectives, which were specified in
the implementing orders of 2003. The new regulations apply to
low frequency infrastructure such as transmission and
distribution lines and distribution substations, as well as high
frequency infrastructure used for telephone services, including
mobile telephone services. The new regulations also introduce a
ten-year program as from the entry into force of Law 36/2001 for
the environmental upgrading of the entire national network to
comply with new
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS — (Continued)
exposure limits. They also envisage the possibility of
recovering, in part or in full, costs incurred by the owners of
power lines and substations through electricity rates, in
accordance with criteria to be set by the Authority for
Electricity and Gas, pursuant to Law 481/95, as they represent
costs incurred in the public interest. At present, the Prime
Minister has not issued the Order setting the criteria for the
upgrading of power lines (Article 4(4) of Law 36/2001), nor
have the criteria for measuring of the parameters and
calculating tolerance limits been established, as provided for
in the Order of July 8, 2003 (relating to power lines).
A number of urban planning and environmental disputes regarding
the construction and operation of certain power plants and
transmission and distribution lines are pending. Based on an
analysis of individual cases, the Company believes the
possibility of adverse rulings is remote. For a limited number
of cases, an unfavorable outcome cannot be ruled out completely,
however. The consequences of unfavorable judgements could, in
addition to the possible payment of damages, also include the
costs related to work required to modify electrical equipment
and the temporary unavailability of the plant. At present such
charges cannot be reliably quantified and are therefore not
included in the “Provision for litigation, risk and other
charges”.
Out-of-court
disputes and litigation connected with the blackout of
September 28, 2003
With regard to the blackout that occurred on September 28,2003, Enel Distribuzione received numerous letters (most drafted
on the basis of standardized forms prepared by consumer
associations) containing requests for automatic/lump-sum
indemnities under the Electricity Service Charter and
resolutions of the Authority for Electricity and Gas (euro
25.82), in addition to further damages to be quantified by
customers with a view to possible legal action.
Enel Distribuzione challenged these requests with the following
arguments: first, neither the Authority resolutions nor the
Electricity Service Charter (whose reference legislation has
been repealed) provide for automatic/lump-sum indemnities in the
case of an interruption of supply, as specified by the Authority
in a press release issued on October 2, 2003. Second, the
causes of the electricity supply interruption of
September 28, 2003 are due to exceptional events beyond the
control of the company, for which it cannot therefore be held
liable in any way.
With regard to litigation, at December 31, 2005, some
53,000 proceedings were pending against Enel, mainly for small
amounts (almost all before justices of the peace in Campania and
Calabria). All involved requests for automatic/lump-sum
indemnities on the basis of the Authority resolutions and the
Service Charter and, in some cases, damages for alleged injury
or loss (pain and suffering, spoiled food, interruption of
economic activity, etc.). In view of the manner and intensity
with which the blackout took place, Enel believes that it
represents an accidental and unpredictable event for which the
Company is therefore not liable. For the reasons already
explained, Enel further believes that the blackout does not fall
among those events for which indemnity is due pursuant to the
supply contract or resolutions of the Authority. At
December 31, 2005, about 7,000 rulings had been issued,
with a majority finding in favor of the plaintiffs. Charges in
respect of such indemnities could be recovered at least in part
under existing insurance policies. In any case, Enel
Distribuzione promptly appealed all adverse rulings to the
competent courts. On February 6, 2006 the Court of S.Maria
di Capua Vetere, Marcianise section, reversed the ruling of the
Justice of Peace of Marcianise following Enel’s appeal. The
court issued a broad opinion, conclusively rejecting the claims
of the customer for lack of any proof of loss, considering the
other grounds for appeal merged and therefore declining to issue
a specific opinion on those aspects of the case. The decision
was especially important in view of the fact that more than
7,000 proceedings are pending before the Justice of Peace of
Marcianise.
The inquiry with respect to distribution companies was initially
scheduled to close on April 2006, but has been postponed until
October 30, 2006.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS — (Continued)
INPS circular no. 63 of May 6, 2005 concerning
contribution obligations in respect of the Cassa Integrazione
Guadagni (CIG), Cassa Integrazione Guadagni Straordinaria
(CIGS), Disoccupazione Involontaria (DS) and Mobilitą
(unemployment benefit schemes)
On May 6, 2005, the Italian National Social Security
Institute (INPS) issued a circular regarding obligatory
contributions to the Cassa Integrazione Guadagni (CIG), Cassa
Integrazione Guadagni Straordinaria (CIGS), Disoccupazione
Involontaria (DS) and Mobilitą (all unemployment
benefit programs). In regulating the matter, the circular
specified that contributions to be paid in respect of the above
programs are also applicable to State-controlled companies and
national public entites involved in industrial activities that
are not wholly public-owned. These include Enel and companies
incorporated by Enel pursuant to Legislative Decree 79 of
March 16, 1999, both for the period following the issue of
the circular and retroactively as from the date on which they
ceased to be entirely owned by public entities (in the case of
Enel, as from the the date of the IPO, in November 1999).
More specifically, under the provisions of the circular Enel SpA
would be required only to make contributions to CIG and CIGS,
while companies incorporated by Enel under Legislative Decree 79
would also be required to contribute to the DS and Mobilitą
programs.
Enel believes that it is not liable for these contributions as
it does not meet the conditions for applicability. In
particular, as regards past periods, the Company contests the
payment of contributions for programs whose benefits it was not
able to use.
The circular has been challenged for precautionary reasons
before the first and second level administrative courts,
requesting its suspension. The Regional Administrative Court
rejected the appeal, stating that the matter fell under the
exclusive jurisdiction of the ordinary courts. Enel therefore
filed an appeal with the Labor Court, asking it to find that no
contribution obligation existed for CIG, CIGS and Mobilitą.
A hearing was scheduled for October 12, 2006.
For the same contribution schemes, with a message dated
August 5, 2005, INPS notified Enel that the initial
deadline of August 16, 2005 set for the payment of accrued
contributions was extended to September 30, 2005. The
deadline was subsequently extended to October 31,
November 30 and, finally, December 31, 2005. All of
the extensions were prompted by the need for further study of
the issues involved in view of their complexity. Enel maintained
constant contact with the social security authorities in order
to provide them with all the information necessary to enable
them to revise their decision. Owing to the complexity of the
matter, INPS felt it advisable to request an opinion from the
Council of State, and with a message dated December 27,2005, it extended the deadline for settlement of the obligation
until the opinion was issued.
With regard to the contribution for the Disoccupazione
Involontaria program (involuntary unemployment), in December
2005 the Ministry of Labor, acting on behalf of INPS, initiated
an inspection to ascertain whether the conditions exempting Enel
SpA and the companies incorporated by it under Legislative
Decree 79/1999 from the contributions continued to hold. Enel
reserves the right to take all appropriate legal action
following the outcome of the inquiry.
In an opinion issued on February 8, 2006, the second
section of the Council of State ruled that the circular may not
have retroactive effect and that there are no grounds for
levying penalties. The Council of State therefore ordered that
the circular be amended appropriately.
Inquiries by the Milan Public Prosecutor’s Office and
the State Audit Court
In February 2003, the Milan Public Prosecutor’s Office
initiated a criminal investigation (proceeding no. 2460/03) of
former top managers of Enelpower and other individuals for
alleged offences to the detriment of Enelpower and payments made
by contractors to receive certain contracts. Implementing the
resolutions of the
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS — (Continued)
boards of Enel, Enelpower and Enel Produzione, legal action was
taken against the suppliers involved, which led to settlements
with Siemens and Alstom.
On the basis of the information that emerged during the criminal
proceedings, the State Audit Court ordered the seizure of real
estate, movable property and receivables of the former Chief
Executive Officer and a former executive of Enelpower, in
addition to the former Chairman of Enel Produzione, citing them
for possible administrative liability in relation to losses
caused to the tax authorities.
On November 9, 2005, Enel, Enelpower and Enel Produzione
deposited an instrument in support of the request of the
Regional Public Prosecutor. On November 18, 2005, with an
instrument also notified to Enelpower, the defense counsel of
the former Enelpower CEO appealed to the Joint Sections of the
Court of Cassation (the supreme court of appeal) asserting that
the State Audit Court had no jurisdiction in the case as Enel
SpA and Enelpower SpA were not public law bodies or public
entities and that their managers could not be considered public
officials or as being charged with a public service.
On November 30, 2005 Enelpower and Enel Produzione notified
the claimants against the former Enel Produzione CEO of a
request, pursuant to Article 2901 et seq. of the Italian
Civil Code, made to the court to declare invalid in their regard
a number of asset disposals carried out by the former CEO of
Enel Produzione.
In a ruling of February 22, 2006, the State Audit Court,
finding that the former directors and managers cited in the suit
were liable, awarded Enelpower damages of approximately
euro 14 million. In May 2006 Enel Power also summoned
the former chief executive officer and the former senior
executive of Enelpower requesting the revocation of certain
transfers of property.
Extension of the municipal property tax
On May 31, 2005, the Italian parliament passed a law to aid
local governments that included, among other things, provisions
regarding the determination of the deemed value of electricity
generation facilities for purposes of assessing, among others,
local property taxes. Under the new law, owners of electric
utilities are required to include in the computation of the
taxable value of their facilities not only land and buildings,
but also the value of removable parts of the facilities, such as
generation equipment.
Should the new rules be applied to all the electricity
generation facilities we own, and should we lose all the trials
regarding the assessment of the tax base of our facilities for
purposes of the local property tax (the imposta comunale sugli
immobili, or ICI), we expect that our tax burden will increase
by approximately
€80 million
per year.
In addition, a recent interpretation of such new rules by the
Italian Supreme Court in connection with one of our facilities,
may lead local authorities to claim that these rules apply
retroactively starting from the fiscal year 2003. We believe
that these claims would be illegitimate and we would challenge
them before the competent court. Should these claims be
successfully brought, we estimate that our ICI liability would
increase of approximately up to
€40 million
for each of the years from 2003.
Ordinance of the Region of Lazio of February 10, 2006:
Suspension of work on maritime infrastructure for the
transformation of the Torrevaldaliga Nord power plant to coal
With the measure of February 10, 2006 the President of the
Region of Lazio ordered the immediate suspension of work on the
construction of maritime infrastructure for the reconversion of
the Torrevaldaliga Nord plant to coal and requested that an
environmental impact assessment (EIA) be conducted because
of an alleged threat to the environment. The suspension of the
works was ordered on the basis of the assertion that such works
cannot be authorized under the procedures (already completed)
envisaged by Law 55/ 02 (designed to unblock construction of
power plants) but are instead subject to a separate EIA pursuant
to Directive 97/ 11/ EC, held to be immediately applicable under
Italian law.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS — (Continued)
The suspension order by the Region of Lazio will quickly lead to
the stoppage of all works associated with the conversion of the
power plant to coal, with a consequent loss of jobs. The
economic loss that would be caused by a protracted suspension,
bearing in mind the spending commitments already undertaken with
the contractors, would amount to more than
euro 1 billion, out of total expenditure for the
project of euro 1.5 billion.
Enel feels that the Region’s action is illegitimate on a
number of grounds and immediately appealed to the Lazio Regional
Administrative Court asking for a preliminary injunction
suspending its validity. With separate measures of March 28 and
March 31, 2006, the Region also denied authorization for
the planned dredging of the sea floor and confirmed the
suspension of the works ordered on February 10. Enel also
appealed these additional measures, asking for an injunction
blocking their enforcement. In an order issued at a hearing on
April 20, 2006, the Lazio Regional Administrative Court
found that the Region had no authority in this field and granted
the suspension of the part of the measures preventing the
continuation of dredging operations, within the limits
established by the environmental impact assessment issued
previously.
On May 29, 2006 the Administrative Tribunal of Lazio
finally ruled in favor of Enel and authorized all sea-based
activities.
(19)
STOCK OPTION PLANS
In 2001, the Company granted a second tranche of options under
the plan (Tranche 2001) for 34,274,050 options. This
tranche’s options vest if certain target prices, or other
criteria, are met. Since certain targets were not achieved, a
portion of the options were forfeited.
In 2002, following the authorization obtained at an Enel
Shareholders’ meeting, the Parent launched a new
“Stock Option Plan”, granting to certain of its
executive 41,748,500 options. Among the beneficiaries of the
2002 stock-option plan, in their capacity as General Manager,
were also those who held, at different times, the position of
Enel’s Chief Executive Officer during that year.
Options under this plan vested if earnings before interest,
taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA), of Enel for the
fiscal year 2002 exceeded the estimated EBITDA as indicated in
the budget approved by the Board of Directors, and if the price
of Enel shares on Telematico outperformed a specified reference
index over the same period. If either of these conditions were
not met, all the options expire. In March 2003, the
Company’s Board of Directors determined that the conditions
for all the options to vest had been satisfied.
In 2003, following the authorization obtained in a Enel
Shareholders’ meeting, the Parent launched a new
“Stock Option Plan”, granting to certain of its
executive 47,624,005 options. Among the beneficiaries of the
2003 stock-option plan, in their capacity as General Manager,
were also those who held, at different times, the position of
Enel’s Chief Executive Officer during that year.
This plan is based on conditions similar to the 2002 plan. In
March 2004, the Company’s Board of Directors determined
that the condition for all the options to vest had been
satisfied.
In 2004, following the authorization obtained in a Enel
Shareholders’ meeting, the Parent launched a new
“Stock Option Plan”, granting to certain of its
executive 38,527,550 options. Among the beneficiaries of the
2004 stock-option plan, in their capacity as General Manager,
was also those who held the position of Enel’s Chief
Executive Officer during that year.
This plan is based on conditions similar to the 2003 plan. In
March 2005, the Company’s Board of Directors determined
that the condition for all the options to vest had been
satisfied.
In 2004, Enel’s Board of Directors awarded to all option
holders, a cash bonus of euro 0.41 due upon exercise of stock
options.
In May 2005 an extraordinary meeting of Enel’s shareholders
initiated a new stock-option plan by resolving to grant the
Board of Directors a new authorization to increase the share
capital by a maximum of
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS — (Continued)
euro 28,757,000 (less than 0.5% of capital at the time),
with characteristics similar to those of the previous
authorizations granted in December 1999, May 2001, May 2003, and
May 2004 and to be used to serve the 2005 stock option plan, as
already approved by the Board of Directors in March 2005.
The 2005 plan — whose beneficiaries include
Enel’s Chief Executive Officer in his capacity as General
Manager — is founded on the same rationale as the
2002, 2003, and 2004 plans, following the provisions of the
implementing Regulations of the last of these with regard to
features described earlier.
The 2005 plan involved the granting of a total of 28,757,000
options to 448 Group executives at a strike price of
euro 7.273. The review carried out by the Board of
Directors to verify the satisfaction of the exercise conditions
ascertained that, during the year in which the options were
granted, the Group EBITDA target was exceeded, but the
performance of Enel’s shares was inferior to that of the
benchmark specified in the Regulations. This caused all the
options granted under the 2005 Plan to automatically lapse. In
2005, Enel’s Board of Directors awarded to all option
holders, a cash bonus of euro 0.62 due upon exercise of stock
options.
The following table summarizes developments in 2005 in the
stock-option plans described earlier, detailing the main
assumptions used in calculating their fair value.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS — (Continued)
As established by the Board of Directors, executives were
divided into different brackets, with the executives receiving a
different number of options depending on the bracket to which
they belong.
The right to subscribe the shares is subordinated to the
executives concerned remaining employed within the Company, with
a number of exceptions (for example, termination of employment
because of retirement or permanent invalidity, exit from the
Group of the company at which the executive is employed, and
succession) specifically governed by the Regulations.
The options may be exercised subject to a number of specific
suspensory conditions. These include exceeding Group EBITDA
forecasts and the performance of Enel shares with respect to the
benchmark index indicated in the Regulations.
(20)
TRANSITION TO INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL REPORTING STANDARDS
(IFRS-EU)
The Company has adopted International Financial Reporting
Standards (IFRS-EU) endorsed by the European Commission starting
from 2005, with the transition date to IFRS-EU at
January 1, 2004. The Company’s last consolidated
financial statements prepared under Italian GAAP were those for
the year ended December 31, 2004.
As required by IFRS 1, this note includes the
reconciliation schedules of the figures presented previously
under Italian GAAP and those that have been restated under
IFRS-EU, together with the related notes on the adjustments.
The reconciliating schedules have been prepared using the same
accounting policies adopted in preparing the consolidated
financial statements at December 31, 2005, which are
discussed in note 2.
Enel has approved and published on June 14, 2005 the
document “Transition to International Financial Reporting
Standards (IFRS-EU)”. Some of the information presented in
such document has been reclassified and supplemented, with the
information included in this note, without altering the effects
of the transition on shareholders’ equity at
December 31, 2004 and the income statement for 2004.
Adoption of IFRS 1
In adopting International Financial Reporting Standards, the
Company has applied IFRS 1 — First-time adoption and
has availed itself of certain exemptions.
The exemptions allowed by IFRS 1 and applicable to the Company,
as used to prepare the opening balance sheet, are set out below:
•
business combinations: the Company has not applied IFRS 3
retrospectively to business combinations that took place before
the transition date;
•
measurement of property, plant and equipment and of intangible
assets at fair value or deemed cost: the Company has applied the
revalued amount method to certain asset categories;
•
employee benefits: the Company has decided to recognize all
cumulative actuarial gains and losses existing at
January 1, 2004, while it has opted for the corridor
approach for all subsequent actuarial gains and losses;
•
translation reserve for balance sheets of consolidated entities
from countries outside the euro area: as permitted by
IFRS 1, the Company has not availed itself of the exemption
and has maintained the net cumulative exchange rate differences
arising from prior translations of financial statements of
foreign entities as determined prior to the transition date;
•
share-based payment: the Company has not applied the exemption
allowed by IFRS 1 for share-based payments and has applied IFRS
2 to all the plans existing at January 1, 2004;
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS — (Continued)
•
classification and measurement of financial instruments: the
Company has not postponed the transition date for IAS 32 and IAS
39 to January 1, 2005, and has taken the related effects
into account in the opening balance sheet at January 1,2004;
•
designation of financial instruments at fair value through
profit and loss or as available for sale: the Company has
decided to adopt this method at the transition date
(January 1, 2004) rather than at the initial recognition
date for IAS 39.
Brief comments are given below on the key adjustments made to
specific balance sheet line items at the beginning and end of
2004.
Balance sheet — Assets
(20.1) Property, plant and equipment (+euro
385 million at January 1, 2004 and +euro
156 million at December 31, 2004); these adjustments
mainly relate to:
•
elimination of the accumulated depreciation of land included in
the plant book value, which under IFRS-EU has to be separated
from the plant and can no longer be depreciated (+euro
70 million at January 1, 2004 and +euro
72 million at December 31, 2004 — see
note 20.24.a Reconciliation of shareholders’ equity);
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS — (Continued)
•
reversal of impairment losses on property, plant and equipment
due to reflect prospectively the review of remaining useful
lives of the relevant assets (+euro 153 million at
January 1, 2004 and +euro 56 million at
December 31, 2004 — see note 20.24
(a) in Reconciliation of shareholders’ equity). An
asset retirement plan is treated as a change to the asset’s
useful life under IFRS-EU which results in a prospective change
to the amounts depreciated. Under Italian GAAP when an
asset’s useful life is reassessed and determined to be
shorter than originally estimated, an impairment loss is
recorded. Consequently, the impairment losses recognized under
Italian GAAP were eliminated and the new useful life has been
used to depreciate the assets. This had a positive effect on
shareholders’ equity at January 1, 2004, and
December 31, 2004, of approximately
euro 153 million and euro 56 million,
respectively;
•
capitalization of dismantling and restoration charges (+euro
27 million at January 1, 2004 and +euro
24 million at December 31, 2004, see
note 20.24.(a) in Reconciliation of shareholders’
equity) and simultaneous accrual to a provision for charges for
the estimated present value of future costs on the liabilities
side of the balance sheet (see note 20.11);
•
reversal of a provision for plant demolition that did not comply
with the recognition criteria of IFRS-EU (+euro 15 million
at January 1, 2004 and +euro 35 million at
December 31, 2004);
•
reversal, separation and recalculation of the depreciation for
significant plant components as a consequence of component
analysis approach (-euro 21 million at January 1, 2004
and -euro 32 million at December 31, 2004; see
note 20.24.(a) in Reconciliation of shareholders’
equity);
•
deferral of connection fees for the gas sector over the same
period of depreciation of related investments (-euro
38 million at January 1, 2004 and -euro
59 million at December 31, 2004);
•
recognition of the fair value of the real estate assets under
IFRS-EU (+euro 179 million at January 1, 2004 and
+euro 61 million at December 31, 2004).
(20.2) Intangible assets (-euro 1,578 million at
January 1, 2004 and -euro 1,453 million at
December 31, 2004); these adjustments are summarized in the
following table:
Extraordinary contribution for the suppression of the
Electricity Industry Employee Pension Fund
(1,423
)
(1,334
)
Goodwill
—
94
TOTAL INTANGIBLE ASSETS
(1,578
)
(1,359
)
These adjustments mainly relate to the elimination of certain
start-up, advertising
costs, deferred charges and internal software development costs
(see note 20.24.(b) in Reconciliation of shareholders’
equity) that do not meet the recognition requirements under
IFRS-EU.
The effect of discounting of “other similar rights”
reflects the adjustment made to record the long-term rights of
way and use of third-party assets for fixed periods of time at a
discounted amount under IFRS-EU which were recognized at nominal
value under Italian GAAP. A corresponding adjustment has been
reflected on the related payables (see note 20.15).
The extraordinary contribution due as a result of the
suppression of the Electricity Industry Employee Pension Fund
for the employees of Enel and private electricity entities
(FPE) established with Law 488 of
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS — (Continued)
December 23, 1999 (the 2000 Finance Act) was eliminated as
it is no longer allowed under IFRS-EU (see note 20.24.(b)
in Reconciliation of shareholders’ equity).
(20.3) Goodwill (euro 0 million at January 1,2004 and +euro 94 million at December 31, 2004); the
adjustments relate to the reversal of amortization no longer
allowed under IFRS-EU. Goodwill as of January 1, 2004 was
subjected to an impairment test without any impact.
(20.4) Deferred tax assets (+euro 479 million at
January 1, 2004 and +euro 614 million at
December 31, 2004); these are the balance sheet entries
offsetting the tax impact of the reconciled items in the
Reconciliation of shareholders’ equity in note 20.24.
(20.5) Non-current financial assets (-euro 5 million
at January 1, 2004 and +euro 45 million at
December 31, 2004); these adjustments (at January 1,2004) relate to the fair value measurement of the investment in
Echelon, listed in the United States. At December 31, 2004
they primarily relate to the fair value measurement of hedging
derivatives.
(20.6) Trade receivables (-euro 15 million at
January 1, 2004 and -euro 26 million at
December 31, 2004); this adjustment reflects the
recognition of prepayments related to the deferral of revenues
and the related
cost-of-activation fees
(e.g., access to, or changes to, tariff plans, promotions, etc.)
and fixed fees (e.g., SIM card activation, prepaid recharges,
etc.) related to the period of time during which
telecommunications services will be provided.
(20.7) Receivables for contract work in progress (-euro
37 million at January 1, 2004 and -euro
37 million at December 31, 2004); this adjustment
relates to the reclassification of trade payables related to
work in progress.
(20.8) Other current assets (-euro 55 million at
January 1, 2004 and -euro 47 million at
December 31, 2004); these adjustments mainly reflect the
elimination of the prepaid substitute tax on the goodwill
generated by the merger of Enel Distribuzione Gas and GE.AD.
into Enel Rete Gas.
Balance sheet — Liabilities
(20.9) Long-term loans (-euro 35 million at
January 1, 2004 and -euro 43 million at
December 31, 2004); these adjustments relate to:
•
the adjustment of foreign currency medium- to long-term payables
using the period-end exchange rate, equal to -euro
33 million at January 1, 2004 and -euro
28 million at December 31, 2004, from the method used
under Italian GAAP, where these payables were recognized using
the hedge exchange rate;
•
adoption of the amortized cost method to measure medium- to
long-term bank loans and bond issues equal to -euro
2 million at January 1, 2004 and -euro 15 million
at December 31, 2004.
(20.10) Post-employment and other employee benefits
(+euro 1,257 million at January 1, 2004 and +euro
1,336 million at December 31, 2004); these adjustments
are summarized in the following table:
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS — (Continued)
(20.11) Provisions for risks and charges (-euro
190 million at January 1, 2004 and -euro
90 million at December 31, 2004); these adjustments
are summarized in the following table:
These adjustments relate to the reversal of certain provisions
that do not meet the criteria for recognition under IFRS-EU.
Please refer to note 1 above for the provision with respect
to dismantling and restoration charges.
(20.12) Deferred tax liabilities (-euro 461 million
at January 1, 2004 and -euro 394 million at
December 31, 2004); these are the balance sheet entries
offsetting the tax effects of the reconciled items recorded in
note 20.24 Reconciliation of shareholders’ equity.
(20.14) Current and non-current financial liabilities
(+euro 391 million at January 1, 2004 and +euro
480 million at December 31, 2004); these adjustments
reflect the fair value measurement of derivative financial
instruments (see note 20.24.(d) in Reconciliation of
shareholders’ equity).
(20.15) Other current liabilities (-euro 45 million
at January 1, 2004 and -euro 38 million at
December 31, 2004); the adjustment relates to the
application of the amortized cost of certain other current
liabilities.
Adjustments to 2004 consolidated income statement items
(20.16) Revenues (-euro 135 million); the
adjustments on revenues, which offset one another, relate mainly
to the deferral of revenues arising from connection fees for the
gas and telecommunications sector (-euro 32 million) which
under Italian GAAP were recognized directly in earnings and the
recognition of a portion of the provision for electricity
discount for an amount of euro 37 million representing
the electricity discount granted to retired employees during the
period. This amount represents an integration of revenues for
electricity sales not recognized under Italian GAAP.
The adjustments related to non-recurring revenues mainly refer
to:
•
elimination of a euro 114 million capital gain
recognized under Italian GAAP on the sale of the real estate
business;
•
reversal of the release of euro 23 million of
restructuring charges which did not meet the criteria for
recognition under IFRS-EU.
(20.17) Personnel (+euro 3 million); the adjustments
relate to the different measurement (actuarial) of employee
benefits (termination benefits, additional months’ pay,
supplementary pension fund, electricity discounts, etc.) for
-euro 15 million, offset by the reversal of other charges
(+euro 18 million), not allowed under IFRS-EU.
(20.18) Services, leases and rentals (+euro
19 million); the adjustment mainly relates costs incurred
during the year as a consequence of the elimination of certain
provisions for risks and charges at the transition date
(January 1, 2004).
a euro 796 million decrease due to the elimination of
amortization of goodwill, which is no longer allowed under
IFRS-EU, amortization of certain intangible assets which did not
meet the criteria for recognition under IFRS-EU and the
elimination of extraordinary contribution (FPE) charge
recognized under Italian GAAP;
•
a euro 663 million increase due to the separation and
recalculation of significant plant components (“component
analysis”), greater depreciation charges following the
reversal of impairment of plant parts and review of remaining
useful life and impairment of goodwill related to the
telecommunication companies.
(20.20) Provisions (-euro 20 million); the
adjustment relates to the reversal of the accrual to the
provision for plant demolition no longer allowed under IFRS-EU.
(20.21) Financial expense, net (+euro 170 million);
the adjustments mainly relate to:
•
interest cost of employee benefit obligations (+euro
144 million);
•
the recognition of the fair value of ineffective portion of
derivative financial instruments (+euro 29 million)
designated as hedges.
(20.22) Extraordinary items (-euro 66 million); the
adjustments mainly refer to the elimination of expenses
recognized as a result of differences arising from the
elimination of fiscally-driven entries in the separate financial
statements of certain Enel’s companies that are recognized
in a specific equity line item under IFRS-EU.
(20.23) Income tax (-euro 19 million); this amount
reflects the tax effect of the adjustments made to income
statement line items.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS — (Continued)
(20.24) Reconciliation of shareholders’ equity
The following schedule sets forth a reconciliation of
shareholders’ equity at January 1, 2004, and
December 31, 2004, and of net income for 2004 is set out
below with comments on the adjustments made to the balances
prepared under Italian GAAP.
— Provisions for risks and charges
(restructuring, demolition, breakdowns, etc.)
f
241
168
(73
)
— Other adjustments
g
(54
)
(71
)
95
Tax impact of the adjustments
938
1,006
14
Total adjustments net of tax effects
(1,694
)
(1,912
)
(85
)
IFRS-EU
19,621
19,066
2,747
a) Property, plant and equipment and related
depreciation
IFRS-EU require that each component of an item of property,
plant and equipment be recognized and depreciated separately
when its cost is significant compared to the total cost of the
item.
The identified significant components, previously recognized and
depreciated as part of a single item under Italian GAAP, were
separated and their depreciation recalculated.
The effect of this adjustment on shareholders’ equity at
January 1, 2004, and December 31, 2004, is negative by
about euro 21 million and euro 32 million,
respectively, equal to the greater depreciation charge.
IFRS-EU require that land be recognized separately and not
depreciated.
Appurtenant land, which was previously depreciated together with
the asset built on it, has been separated, with the elimination
of the related depreciation. This had a positive effect on
shareholders’ equity at January 1, 2004, and
December 31, 2004, of about euro 70 million and
euro 72 million, respectively.
The residual useful life of property, plant and equipment is
reviewed annually and reflected prospectively. An asset
retirement plan is treated as review of the plant useful life
under IFRS-EU while determing an impairment loss under Italian
GAAP.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS — (Continued)
Consequently, the impairment losses recognized under Italian
GAAP were eliminated and the new useful life has been used to
depreciate the assets. This had a positive effect on
shareholders’ equity at January 1, 2004, and
December 31, 2004, of about euro 153 million and
euro 56 million, respectively.
IFRS-EU require that dismantling and restoration costs of
production sites to be incurred upon conclusion of production be
estimated and recognized at their present value under property,
plant and equipment and depreciated. These costs are also
provided for in the provisions for risks and charges, with an
annual adjustment of the present value for the accreation costs.
Under Italian GAAP, such costs are recognized when the
obligation is probable and the amount is objectively quantified.
The effect of this adjustment on shareholders’ equity at
January 1, 2004, and December 31, 2004, is about -euro
13 million and -euro 19 million, respectively.
b) Start-up, development and advertising costs and
other intangible assets
IFRS-EU do not allow the recognition of certain intangible
assets such as
start-up, incorporation
and advertising costs. Consequently, such assets were eliminated.
This adjustment decreased shareholders’ equity at
January 1, 2004, and December 31, 2004, by about
euro 77 million and euro 38 million,
respectively.
Capitalization of the extraordinary contribution for the
suppression of the Electricity Industry Employee Pension Fund,
as provided for by a specific law and fully paid at the
transition date, is not allowed under IFRS-EU which provide for
the recognition of such contributions as incurred.
This adjustment had a negative effect on shareholders’
equity at January 1, 2004, and December 31, 2004, of
about euro 1,424 million and
euro 1,334 million, respectively.
c) Goodwill
As required by IFRS 1, the net carrying value of goodwill
in the financial statements prepared under Italian GAAP at the
transition date is periodically tested for impairment and is not
amortized. Goodwill arising from the acquisition of investments
in entities outside the euro area is adjusted at period-end
exchange rates for IFRS-EU purposes.
The total effect on shareholders’ equity at
December 31, 2004, is a positive euro 94 million.
IFRS-EU establish specific rules regarding accounting for
derivatives that differ from those provided for by Italian GAAP.
With respect to derivatives hedging future cash flows of assets,
liabilities or future transactions (cash flow hedges), the
adjustments relate to the:
•
recognition of the fair value of the derivative asset or
liability in the balance sheet at its fair value;
•
recognition of a cash flow hedge reserve in equity for the
effective part of the hedge;
•
recognition of the ineffective part of the hedge in the income
statement.
With respect to derivatives hedging fair value changes in hedged
assets or liabilities recognized in the balance sheet (fair
value hedges on interest rates), the key effects relate to:
•
recognition of the derivative asset or liability in the balance
sheet at its fair value;
•
set-off of the change in fair value of the hedged risk against
the hedged item.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS — (Continued)
These adjustments produced a negative effect on
shareholders’ equity at January 1, 2004, and
December 31, 2004, of euro 391 million and
euro 480 million, respectively.
e) Employee benefits
IFRS-EU identify different types of post-employment benefits,
which are benefits due to employees upon termination of their
service. Under defined benefit plans, the actuarial risk (that
benefits will be less than expected) and investment risk (that
assets invested will be insufficient to meet expected benefits)
fall on the entity and not the employee. Therefore, the
actuarial present value of the expected liability and related
costs and income are recognized, including the financial expense
and actuarial gains and losses.
The most significant difference related to the recognition of
the liability for the electricity discount granted to current
and retired employees, with an impact equal to about
euro 952 million and euro 1,014 million on
shareholders’ equity at January 1, 2004, and
December 31, 2004, respectively.
The other adjustments had a negative effect on
shareholders’ equity at January 1, 2004, and
December 31, 2004, of approximately
euro 305 million and euro 322 million,
respectively.
Under IFRS-EU, stock options granted to employees are measured
at their fair value at the grant date. The cost of the options
granted is recognized in the income statement over the vesting
period against a specific reserve under shareholders’
equity.
Italian GAAP do not require the recognition of stock option
plans in the financial statements.
f) Provisions for risks and charges
IFRS-EU require that provisions for risks and charges be
recognized only when an entity has a present (legal or
constructive) obligation as a result of a past event and has no
realistic alternative to settling that obligation. The
adjustment relates to the reversal of provisions for breakdowns,
plant demolition and restructuring, which do not meet these
requirements, with an impact equal to about
euro 241 million and euro 202 million on
shareholders’ equity at January 1, 2004, and
December 31, 2004, respectively.
Moreover, under IFRS-EU, for liabilities for which provisions
have been made that will become payable in future periods, the
effects of discounting must be reflected.
The adjustment at December 31, 2004, also includes
euro 34 million relating to the costs for the Terna
bonus shares, equal to the market value of the shares.
The total effect on shareholders’ equity is a positive
euro 241 million and euro 168 million at
January 1, 2004, and December 31, 2004, respectively.
g) Other adjustments
These have a negative effect on shareholders’ equity at
January 1, 2004 and December 31, 2004 of
euro 54 million and euro 71 million,
respectively. They mainly relate to the discounting of long-term
receivables and payables and the reversal of deferred taxes.
A reconciliation of the consolidated cash flow statement is not
presented as the effects of applying IFRS-EU are not significant.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS — (Continued)
21.
RECONCILIATION OF NET INCOME AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
FROM IFRS-EU AND U.S. GAAP
Differences Between IFRS-EU and United States Generally
Accepted Accounting Principles
As discussed in Note 2, the accompanying financial
statements for the period ending December 31, 2005, were
prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting
Standards as adopted by the European Union. There are no
differences between IFRS-EU as adopted by the EU and IFRS
published by the International Accounting Standards Board
(“IASB”) relevant for the Company’s financial
statements.
The 2005 year is the first year that Enel’s financial
statements have been prepared on an IFRS-EU basis. A
reconciliation of opening equity balance and net income for the
first financial year beginning on January 1, 2004 from
Italian GAAP to IFRS-EU is included in Note 20 —
“Transition to International Financial Reporting Standard
(IFRS)”.
In relation to this transition to IFRS-EU, in April 2005 the
Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) adopted
amendments to
Form 20-F to
provide a one time accommodation relating to first financial
statements prepared under IFRS-EU for foreign private issuers
registered with the SEC. This accommodation permits Enel for its
first year of reporting under IFRS-EU to report two years rather
than three years of statements of income, changes in
shareholders’ equity and cash flows prepared in accordance
with IFRS-EU, with appropriate related disclosure and respective
reconciliation of financial statement items to generally
accepted accounting principles in the United States of America
(“U.S. GAAP”).
IFRS-EU differ in certain significant aspects from accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America
(“U.S. GAAP”). The following table
(“Reconciliation Table”) presents a summary of the
adjustments to consolidated net income and to consolidated
shareholders’ equity that would have been required if
U.S. GAAP had been applied instead of IFRS-EU.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS — (Continued)
Net Income
Shareholders’ Equity
For the Years Ended
For the Years Ended
December 31,
December 31,
Note
2005
2004
2005
2005
2004
2005
(millions of
(millions of
(millions of euro)
U.S. dollars)
(millions of euro)
U.S. dollars)
Financial statements:
Of the parent company
3,895
2,631
4,612
19,057
17,953
22,567
Of the minority interest
21.1
237
116
281
359
1,113
425
Total
4,132
2,747
4,893
19,416
19,066
22,992
Increases/ (Decreases) due to:
Minority Interest
21.1
(237
)
(116
)
(281
)
(359
)
(1,113
)
(425
)
Customers’ connection fees
21.2
(419
)
(464
)
(496
)
(1,827
)
(1,408
)
(2,164
)
Fixed Asset and Related Depreciation
21.3
183
1,057
217
645
462
764
Capitalized interest and related depreciation
21.4
(12
)
(33
)
(14
)
1,236
1,248
1,464
Assets retirement obligations
21.10
1
(6
)
1
10
9
12
Negative goodwill
21.8
(24
)
—
(28
)
(24
)
—
(28
)
Pension and employee termination accounting
21.6
47
(11
)
56
146
73
173
Other post-retirement benefits accounting
21.6
(41
)
49
(49
)
5
46
6
Stock compensation cost
21.12
(9
)
(85
)
(11
)
(76
)
(67
)
(90
)
Early retirement program
21.5
(121
)
197
(143
)
76
197
90
Gain on Real Estate disposal
21.11
220
(667
)
261
(447
)
(667
)
(529
)
Intangible assets
28
5
33
(32
)
(60
)
(38
)
Goodwill amortization and other intangibles
21.7
947
(86
)
1,121
(775
)
166
(918
)
Goodwill impairment
21.7
(69
)
(1,722
)
(82
)
97
(1,722
)
115
Deferred taxes on equity reserves
21.9
—
—
—
(571
)
(571
)
(676
)
Investment in equity securities
21.13
(4
)
4
(5
)
19
9
22
Other differences
21.14
24
10
28
61
37
72
Tax effect of reconciling items
62
146
73
29
(27
)
34
Minorities on reconciling items
21.1
(10
)
6
(12
)
9
19
11
Amounts under U.S. GAAP corresponding to Parent
Company
4,698
1,031
5,562
17,638
15,697
20,887
The condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of
December 31, 2005 and 2004 presented below have been
restated to reflect the differences between IFRS-EU and U.S.GAAP.
The condensed Consolidated Statements of Income for the years
ended December 31, 2005 and 2004 presented below have been
restated to reflect the differences between IFRS-EU and U.S.
GAAP.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS — (Continued)
The following table show the statements of changes in
shareholders’ equity for the years ended December 31,2005, and 2004 restated to reflect the differences between
IFRS-EU and U.S. GAAP.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS’
EQUITY
2005
2004
2005
(millions of
(millions of euro)
U.S. dollars)
U.S. GAAP shareholders’ equity at the beginning of
the year
15,697
18,651
18,588
Movements during the year:
Net income for the year
4,698
1,031
5,562
Interim dividend
(1,169
)
(2,014
)
(1,384
)
Residual dividend
(2,214
)
(2,195
)
(2,622
)
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
— Minimum pension liabilities
17
43
22
— Financial instruments
241
(45
)
285
— Other
29
(15
)
34
Exercise of stock options
339
241
401
U.S. GAAP shareholders’ equity at the end of the
year
17,638
15,697
20,887
Tax effects on other comprehensive income are disclosed in
Note 22(a).
DISCLOSURE OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME, NET OF TAX
2005
2004
2005
(millions of
(millions of euro)
U.S. dollars)
Net income in accordance with U.S. GAAP
4,698
1,031
5,562
Minimum pension liabilities
17
43
22
Investments in equity securities
141
5
167
Derivatives
100
(50
)
118
Other changes
29
(15
)
34
Total comprehensive income
4,985
1,014
5,903
21.1. Minority Interest
Under U.S. GAAP, shareholder’s equity and net income
comprise the equity portion attributed to equity holders of the
Parent Company only. However, under IFRS-EU equity and net
income include the equity and net income corresponding to the
shareholders of both the controlling shareholder and the
minority interests. Therefore, an adjustment to reconcile to
U.S. GAAP is recorded in order to exclude the Minority
Interests portion of shareholder’s equity and net income.
21.2. Customers’ Connection Fees
Under IFRS-EU the connection fees collected from new non
eligible customers for connection to the electricity network
which does not require an upgrade of the distribution network
assets, are considered as a standalone transaction as there is
no further obligation for the Company and all other service are
paid for separately. Therefore such fees are immediately
recognized as revenues.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS — (Continued)
Under U.S. GAAP, these fees are deferred over the estimated
life of the customer relationship (20 years).
21.3. Fixed Assets and Related Depreciation
The Company elected to use certain revaluations made to fixed
assets at, or before, the date of transition to IFRS-EU as
deemed costs at the date of the revaluation. Under
U.S. GAAP, such revaluations are not permitted.
The Reconciliation Table includes adjustments to eliminate the
revaluations and related accumulated depreciation, to reflect
the effect of the recomputation of depreciation charge on a
historical U.S. GAAP cost basis and to recognize gains or
losses on asset disposal in accordance with U.S. GAAP book
value.
21.4. Capitalized Interest and Related
Depreciation
Under U.S. GAAP, interest is capitalized as part of the
cost of constructing an asset in accordance with Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 34,
“Capitalization of Interest Cost”. Under IAS 23,
interest capitalization is permitted, but not required. Under
IFRS-EU, the Company has elected not to capitalize interest. The
Reconciliation Table includes an adjustment to reflect the
capitalization of interest on assets, to the extent those assets
qualify for interest capitalization in accordance with
SFAS No. 34, and the related effect on the
depreciation.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS — (Continued)
21.5. Early Retirement Program
Under IFRS-EU an entity shall recognize termination benefits as
a liability and an expense when the entity has a detailed formal
plan, without realistic possibility of withdrawal, to terminate
the employment of an employee or group of employees before the
normal retirement date.
Under U.S. GAAP in accordance with SFAS 88, voluntary
early retirement benefits are recognized when the employees
formally accept the offer and the amount can be reasonably
estimated.
The reconciliations include adjustments to eliminate the
provision that did not meet U.S. GAAP criteria.
21.6.
Employee Benefit Obligations
Pursuant to an exemption provided by IFRS 1, the Company
has elected to record unrecognized net actuarial gains and
losses as of January 1, 2004 to retained earnings. Under
U.S. GAAP this exemption is not applicable and generates a
difference relating to the amortization of actuarial gains and
losses recognized in income.
Additionally, SFAS 87 requires the recognition of an
additional minimum liability if the unfunded accumulated benefit
obligation exceeds the accrued pension liability. If an
additional minimum pension liability is recognized, an equal
amount is recognized as an intangible asset to the extent of
unrecognized prior service cost. Any remaining excess is
reported as other comprehensive income, under Shareholders’
equity. IFRS-EU does not require the recognition of an
additional minimum liablility.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS — (Continued)
Assumed health care cost trend rates have a significant effect
on the amounts reported for the health care plans. A
one-percentage-point change in assumed health care cost trend
rates would have the following effects:
1-Percentage-
1-Percentage-
Point Increase
Point Decrease
(millions of euro)
Effect on total cost
1
(1
)
Effect on accumulated post-retirement benefit obligation
28
(22
)
The Company’s pension plan and post retirement plan asset,
which solely relate to certain Spanish subsidiaries, are
entirely covered by insurance contracts. Under the terms of the
contract, the annual yield is guaranteed by the insurance
company and investment decisions are the responsibility of the
insurance company.
Estimated Future Benefit Payments
The following benefit payments, including benefits attributable
to estimated future employee service, are expected to be paid:
Pension
Other Post-
Benefits
retirement Benefits
(millions of euro)
2006
103
56
2007
111
58
2008
129
60
2009
156
61
2010
187
63
Years 2011-2015
1,129
326
21.7.
Business Combination, Goodwill and Intangible Assets
Pursuant to an exemption provided by IFRS 1, the Company
elected not to restate business combinations completed prior to
January 1, 2004.
Under U.S. GAAP, the Company has adopted Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 141, Business
Combinations (SFAS 141), which requires the purchase method
of accounting to be used for all business combinations initiated
after June 30, 2001. SFAS 141 also includes guidance
on the initial recognition and measurement of goodwill and other
intangible assets acquired in a business combination.
Effective January 1, 2002, the Company adopted Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 142, Goodwill and Other
Intangible Assets (SFAS 142). SFAS 142 prohibits the
amortization of all goodwill and intangible assets with
indefinite useful lives, and also requires that goodwill
included in the carrying value of equity method investments no
longer be amortized. Intangible assets, excluding goodwill, that
have finite useful lives continue to be amortized over their
useful lives.
SFAS 142 requires that goodwill is tested for impairment
using a prescribed two-step process. The first step screens for
potential impairment by comparing the fair value of the
reporting units to their carrying values. If the fair value of a
reporting unit is less than its carrying value, the second step
must be completed. Step two requires a computation of the
implied fair value of the reporting unit’s goodwill in
comparison to the carrying amount of goodwill. Any excess of the
carrying amount of goodwill over its implied fair value must be
recorded as an impairment charge. The Company completed the
annual goodwill impairment tests required by SFAS 142 in
the fourth quarters of 2004 and 2005 except for the
Telecommunications reporting unit for which the impairment test
was completed in June 2004, and June 2005. As of
December 31, 2004 and December 31, 2005, the fair
values
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS — (Continued)
calculated exceeded their carrying values for all reporting
units except in the Telecommunications segment as discussed
below.
The Company estimates fair value for its reporting units using a
present value technique, incorporating estimated discounted
future cash flow assumptions that marketplace participants would
use in their estimates of fair value. The telecommunications
reporting unit was evaluated on a stand alone basis, without
considering the weighted average cost of capital benefits
resulting from being part of Enel. The June 30, 2004
impairment test of the telecommunications reporting unit,
evaluated using the same basis as previous years, did not result
in an impairment charge. However, due to a change in
circumstances that the Company believed would more likely than
not reduce the fair value of the reporting unit below its
carrying amount, the Company reperformed the impairment test as
of December 31, 2004, which resulted in an additional
goodwill impairment charge of euro 1,722 million as
compared to the charge recorded under IAS 36.
The reconciliation table adjustment in 2005 includes the
increase in net income equal to euro 947 million
related to the disposal of the Company’s 62.75% of capital
share of Wind which was recorded at lower carrying amount under
U.S. GAAP.
21.7.1
Camuzzi Purchase Price Allocation
On May 23, 2002, consistent with its strategy to expand its
operations in the natural gas distribution and sales activities,
the Company purchased 98.81% of the share capital of Camuzzi
Gazometri SpA, the second largest distributor of natural gas in
Italy, for euro 1,045 million in cash.
Under U.S. GAAP, the Company accounted for such acquisition
as a purchase and recorded a customer relationship intangible of
euro 566 million, which is being amortized over
15 years, and a license valued at euro 66 million
which is being amortized over 9 years.
The following table summarizes the fair value of the assets
acquired and liabilities assumed, on a U.S. GAAP basis, at
the date of acquisition:
Millions of euro
Current assets
479
Fixed assets, net
866
Intangible assets
632
Other non-current assets
98
Total assets acquired
2,075
Current liabilities
(658
)
Long-term debt
(228
)
Minority interest
(2
)
Other non-current liabilities
(142
)
Total liabilities assumed
(1,030
)
Net assets acquired
1,045
The acquisition was accounted for as a purchase. Of the
euro 632 million of acquired intangible assets,
euro 566 million was assigned to customer
relationships and is being amortized over a period of
15 years, deemed to be appropriate in view of estimated
customer turnover, and euro 66 million was assigned to
the licenses for the distribution of gas and is being amortized
over the duration of the license of 9 years. If the license
is not renewed, the customer relationship continues to exist
even though the license is held by another party.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS — (Continued)
21.7.2
EUFER Acquisition
On June 16, 2003, Enel and Uniņn Fenosa signed an
agreement for the acquisition by Enel of 80% of
Uniņn Fenosa Energģas Especiales (EUFER), a
company that groups the activities of the Spanish operator in
the field of energy produced from renewable resources for
euro 178 million, while Uniņn Fenosa holds a call
option on 30% of the shares expiring at the end of 2007.
The following table summarizes the fair value of the assets
acquired and liabilities assumed, on a U.S. GAAP basis, at
the date of acquisition:
Millions of euro
Current assets
46
Fixed assets, net
168
Goodwill
123
Other non-current assets
39
Total assets acquired
376
Current liabilities
(47
)
Long-term debt
(135
)
Minority interest
(14
)
Other non-current liabilities
(2
)
Total liabilities assumed
(198
)
Net assets acquired
178
The acquisition was treated as a purchase. For U.S. GAAP
purposes the goodwill is assigned to the Generation and Energy
Management sector and it is not amortized.
21.7.3
Wind Acquisition
On March 20, 2003, Enel reached an agreement for the
acquisition of the 26.6% share in Wind’s capital stock held
by the France Telecom Group (France Telecom), thus achieving the
full ownership of Wind. The price paid was
euro 1,389 million and the purchase agreement included
the cancellation of the call option held by France Telecom
giving France Telecom the right to increase its share in Wind to
44%. The agreement provides for payments of additional
consideration to France Telecom in case Enel should sell Wind
shares before December 31, 2004 receiving a cash price per
share higher than that paid by Enel to France Telecom. The
transfer of the shares and the payment of the price, in addition
to the transfer of the euro 175 million subordinated
loan, took place on July 1, 2003.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS — (Continued)
The following table summarizes the fair value of the assets
acquired and liabilities assumed, on a U.S. GAAP basis, at
the date of acquisition:
Millions of euro
Current assets
395
Fixed assets, net
922
Goodwill
855
Intangible assets
595
Other non-current assets
1,284
Total assets acquired
4,051
Current liabilities
(622
)
Long-term debt
(1,855
)
Minority interest
(7
)
Other non-current liabilities
(178
)
Total liabilities assumed
(2,662
)
Net assets acquired
1,389
The acquisition was accounted for as a purchase. Of the
euro 595 million acquired intangible assets,
euro 408 million was assigned to brands which are
determined to have an indefinite useful life and therefore are
not amortized, euro 103 million was assigned to customer
relationships and is being amortized over 5 years, deemed
to be appropriate based on estimated customer turnover, and
euro 84 million was assigned to the GSM license and is
being amortized over the residual duration of the license (which
will expire in 2018). The resulting goodwill of
euro 855 million was assigned to the
Telecommunications Division. The minority interest represents
third parties interests in a subsidiary of Wind.
21.7.4
Maritza Acquisition
On March 5, 2003, as part of the program aimed at expansion
of its international operations, the Company acquired 60% of the
share capital of the Dutch company Entergy Power Holding Maritza
BV, which in turn controls 73% of the Bulgarian company Maritza
East III Power Company AD. The latter will carry out the
refurbishment and environmental upgrade of a lignite-fired
generation plant located in Bulgaria.
The following table summarizes the fair value of the assets
acquired and liabilities assumed, on a U.S. GAAP basis, at
the date of acquisition:
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS — (Continued)
The acquisition was accounted for as a purchase. The resulting
goodwill of euro 28 million is assigned to the Generation
and Energy Management sector and it is not amortized.
21.7.5
Viesgo Acquisition
On January 8, 2002, as part of the program aimed at
expansion of its international operations, the Company acquired
100% of the share capital of Electra de Viesgo SL, the holding
company of the Viesgo Group, the fourth largest electricity
operator in Spain, for euro 1,920 million in cash.
The following table summarizes the fair value of the assets
acquired and liabilities assumed, on a U.S. GAAP basis, at
the date of acquisition:
Millions of euro
Current assets
252
Fixed assets, net
1,421
Goodwill
757
Other non-current assets
123
Total assets acquired
2,553
Current liabilities
(457
)
Long-term debt
(12
)
Minority interest
(19
)
Other non-current liabilities
(145
)
Total liabilities assumed
(633
)
Net assets acquired
1,920
The acquisition was accounted for as a purchase. The resulting
goodwill of euro 757 million was assigned to the Generation
and Energy Management sector. Minority interest relates to
certain Viesgo subsidiaries.
21.7.6
Goodwill disclosures
The carrying values of goodwill under U.S. GAAP for the
segments are as follows:
Following the disposal of the 62.75% of stake in Wind, the
remaining goodwill, equal to euro 1,050 million, has
been classified in the related investment.
Accumulated amortization as of December 31, 2005 was
euro 138 million for customer relationships and
euro 26 million for licenses. Accumulated amortization
as of December 31, 2004 was euro 129 million for
customer relationships, euro 28 million for licenses,
and euro 32 million for the customer portfolio. In
addition, trademarks of euro 408 million, which are
not subject to amortization, are recorded as of
December 31, 2005 and 2004.
21.8.
Negative Goodwill
Under IFRS-EU any excess cost of the acquisition over the
acquirer’s interest in the fair value of the net
identifiable assets acquired represents goodwill and should be
recognized as an asset. Negative goodwill is recognized in
earnings. When there is an apparent excess of the
acquirer’s interest in the fair value of the net assets
acquired over the cost of the acquisition, the acquirer is
required to undertake a reassessment of the cost of the business
combination and fair value of the acquired assets and assumed
liabilities and contingent liabilities. If excess continues to
exist following the reassessment, it is recognized immediately
in profit.
Under U.S. GAAP, the excess of the cost of an acquired
entity over the net of the amounts assigned to assets acquired
and liabilities assumed is recognized as goodwill. If a negative
goodwill exists it should be allocated as a pro rata reduction
of the non-current assets, with some exemptions. If any excess
remains after reducing to zero the amounts that otherwise would
have been assigned to assets, that remaining excess is
recognized as gain in the period in which the business
combination is completed, unless the combination involves
contingent consideration which would be recognized as an
additional element of cost of the acquired entity. In this case,
a potentially lesser amount is recognized as gain in the period.
In connection with the acquisition in 2005 of Romanian companies
Electrica Banat and Electrica Dobrogea under IFRS-EU the Company
recorded in earnings a negative goodwill of
euro 24 million. Under U.S. GAAP this amount was
allocated as reduction of tangible assets acquired. The
reconciliation table includes an adjustment to the negative
goodwill elimination and the recomputation of tangible asset
depreciation based on new U.S. GAAP historical cost. No
additional U.S. GAAP/ IFRS-EU differences have been
identified in the Electrical Banat and Electrica Dobrogea’s
purchase accounting.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS — (Continued)
21.9.
Current and Deferred Taxes
Under IFRS-EU, the Company is not required to recognize deferred
tax on capital reserves, including assets revaluations, if the
Company is able to control when and whether the reserves created
from the revalued assets are distributed. Therefore, considering
that the company has determined that such reserves will not be
distributed in the foreseeable future, no provision had to be
made.
For U.S. GAAP purposes, as set forth in
SFAS No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes”,
these taxes are required to be recognized since certain criteria
have been met.
The reconciliation reflects the impact on deferred taxes related
to the IFRS-EU — U.S. GAAP differences described
above.
21.10.
Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations
Under IAS 37, the entity must recognize a liability as soon as
the decommissioning obligation is created, which is normally
when the facility is constructed and the damage to be restored
is done. The amount recognized is discounted to its present
value and added to the corresponding asset’s cost.
Under U.S. GAAP, effective January 1, 2003, Enel
adopted SFAS No. 143 Accounting for asset retirement
obligations (SFAS 143), which addresses financial
accounting and reporting for obligations associated with the
retirement of tangible long-lived assets and the associated
asset retirement costs. The standard applies to legal
obligations associated with the retirement of long-lived assets
that results from the acquisition, construction, development or
normal use of assets. Under this standard, a liability is
recognized for such an obligation at its fair value when
incurred and a corresponding asset retirement cost is added to
the carrying amount of the related asset.
Although under U.S. GAAP Asset Retirement Obligations
recognition criteria are very similar to IFRS-EU, differences
exist to account for changes in cost estimate or to determine
the net present value of the obligations.
21.11.
Gain on sale of real estate business
On July 14, 2004, Enel sold 887 office buildings for
euro 1.4 billion, consisting of
euro 1.325 billion in cash and
euro 75 million in subordinated debt. Concurrent with
the sale, Enel leased back certain properties for periods
ranging from six to twenty years at an annual rental of
euro 84 million. In accordance with IFRS-EU, Enel
recognized in full, on the date of sale, the net gain
representing the difference between the sale proceeds and the
net book value of the office buildings including those that were
simultaneously leased back.
Under U.S. GAAP, considering the subordinated debt, the
sale leaseback transaction has been accounted for as a financing
transaction, with the gain deferred accordingly. The condensed
consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2004
presented in accordance with U.S. GAAP reflects the related
assets and liabilities with respect to these sale leaseback
properties.
In the 2005 year, Enel extinguished the subordinated debt
with the counterparty and consequently the sale-leaseback
transaction qualified for sales recognition and the leaseback is
classified as an operating lease. The gain is deferred and
recognized over the lease term.
The reconciliation includes the adjustment to the financial
statements for the gain deferred over the life of the operating
lease.
21.12.
Stock option compensation cost
Under U.S. GAAP, Enel accounts for stock-based compensation
plans under the recognition and measurement provisions of
APB 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees.
Accordingly, stock-based employee compensation cost is based on
the intrinsic value (the excess of the market price of the
underlying common stock
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS — (Continued)
at the balance sheet date over the exercise price of the
option), and is recognized over the vesting period. Under
U.S. GAAP, a modification to include a fixed cash bonus
that is contingent upon exercise of a fixed option award is
accounted for as a combined variable award with the cash bonus
reducing the stated exercise price of the option.
The reconciliation includes an adjustment to record compensation
cost related to stock option plans in accordance with
U.S. GAAP.
21.12.1
Stock option compensation disclosures
In accordance with SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for
Stock-Based Compensation”, the Company intends to continue
to apply APB No. 25 for purposes of determining net income
and to present the pro forma disclosures required by
SFAS No. 123 as amended by SFAS No. 148
“Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation —
Transition and Disclosure an amendment of FASB Statement
No. 123”.
The following table presents additional information regarding
stock option plans.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS — (Continued)
The Company’s pro forma earnings for the years ended
December 31, 2005 and 2004, had compensation costs,
relating to the plan launched by the Parent and its subsidiary
Wind, recorded in accordance with SFAS No. 123, as
amended by SFAS No. 148, are presented below (millions
of euro):
2005
2004
Net income in accordance with U.S. GAAP, as reported
4,698
1,031
Stock-based employee compensation expense, as reported
165
139
Stock-based employee compensation expense under fair value
(179
)
(122
)
Pro forma net income
4,684
1,048
The Company’s pro forma earnings per share for the years
ended December 31, 2005 and 2004, had compensation costs,
relating to the plan launched by the Parent, recorded in
accordance with SFAS No. 123, as amended by
SFAS No. 148, are presented below:
2005
2004
As Reported
Pro Forma
As Reported
Pro Forma
Basic and diluted earnings per share
0.77
0.76
0.17
0.17
The effects of applying SFAS No. 123 in this pro forma
disclosure should not be interpreted as being indicative of
future effects.
21.13.
Investments in Equity Securities
IFRS-EU requires investments in unlisted equity investments for
which a fair value can be reasonably estimated to be recorded at
fair value with changes in fair value recorded in reserves
within shareholders’ equity.
U.S. GAAP requires unlisted equity securities to be
recognized at cost with any impairment loss recognized in
earnings.
21.14.
Other differences
The heading includes residual differences with a minor impact on
the reconciliation.
21.15.
Classification Differences
Discontinued operations
Following the disposal of investments in Wind and Terna, which
took place on August 11, 2005 and September 15, 2005
respectively, these entities were deconsolidated as from those
dates and the financial performance achieved up to the disposal
date is reported under IFRS-EU as discontinued operations.
For U.S. GAAP purposes, the Company still maintains
significant continuing cash flows and continuing significant
involvement in the operations of Terna and Wind respectively.
The performance of both entities included within discontinued
operations under IFRS-EU, has been therefore reclassified by the
Company as continuing operations in the year presented herein
for U.S. GAAP purposes.
21.16.
Recently U.S. Accounting Pronouncements
Variable interest entities. In March 2005 the FASB issued
a Staff Position No. FIN 46(R)-5 addressing whether
reporting enterprise should consider if it holds also an
implicit variable rate in a variable interest entity or
potential variable interest entity. An implicit interest is an
implied pecuniary interest in an entity that changes in the fair
value of entity’s net assets exclusive of variable
interest. The determination of whether and implicit
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS — (Continued)
variable interest exists is a matter of judgment that depends on
the relevant facts and circumstances. For entities to which
Interpretation 46(R) has been applied, the guidance in this FSP
shall be applied in the first reporting period beginning after
March 3, 2005. For entities to which Interpretation 46(R)
has not been applied, the guidance in this FSP shall be applied
in accordance with the effective date and transition provisions
of Interpretation 46(R). The adoption of this FSP is expected
not to have a significant impact on the Company’s
consolidated financial statements.
In June 2005, the emerging issues task force has reached a
consensus on
EITF 04-5,
determining whether a General Partner, or General Partners as a
group, controls a Limited Partnership or similar entity when the
limited partners have certain rights. General Partner is
presumed to control limited partnership regardless of its
ownership interest. Presumption of control by the general
partner is overcome if (a) the limited partners have the
substantive ability to liquidate partnership or (b) the
limited partners have substantive participating rights. In July
2005 the FASB amended AICPA Statement of Position 78-9 with FSP
No. SOP 78-9-1 to be consistent with the consensus in
EITF 04-5. The
consensus is effective for all new limited partnership
subsequent to June 29, 2005 and for the first reporting
period beginning after December 15, 2005 for all other
limited partnerships. The Company does not believe that the
adoption of
EITF 04-5 will
have a significant impact on the consolidated financial
statements.
Financial instruments with characteristics of both
liabilities and equity. In June 2005 the FASB Staff issued
the FASB Staff Position FAS 150-5 to address whether
freestanding warrants or other similar instruments on shares
that are redeemable would be subject to the requirement of FASB
Statement No. 150, regardless of the timing of the
redemption feature or the redemption price. The guidance on this
FSP shall be applied to the first reporting period beginning
after June 30, 2005. The adoption of this FSP is expected
not to have a significant impact on the Company’s
consolidated financial statements.
Other than temporary impairment of investments. In March
2004, the EITF reached a consensus on
EITF 03-1,
“The Meaning of Other-Than-Temporary Impairment and Its
Application to Certain Investments,”
EITF 03-1
addresses the meaning of other than temporary impairment and its
application to investments classified as either
available-for-sale or
held-to-maturity under
SFAS 115, “Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt
and Equity Securities,” and investments accounted for under
the cost method or the equity method. A consensus was reached on
how to evaluate when an impairment of securities or investments
is other than temporary. A previous consensus in November 2003
addressed certain quantitative and qualitative disclosures about
unrealized losses pertaining to debt and equity securities
classified as available-for-sale or
held-to-maturity. In
September 2004, the FASB delayed the effective date for
application of the recognition and measurement provisions of
EITF 03-1 to
investments in securities that are impaired until additional
guidance is issued. On November 2005 the FASB issued FSP
FAS 115-1/124-1. This FASB Staff Position nullifies certain
requirements of
Issue 03-1 and
carries forward some other requirements from the same Issue. The
guidance in this FSP shall be applied to reporting periods
beginning after December 15, 2005. Certain disclosure
requirements from
EITF 03-1 are
still in effect.
Guidance in Determining Whether to Report Discontinued
Operations. In November 2004, the EITF reached a consensus
on EITF 03-13,
“Applying the Conditions in Paragraph 42 of FASB
No. 144 in Determining Whether to Report Discontinued
Operations.”
EITF 03-13
addresses how an ongoing entity should evaluate whether the
operations and cash flows of a disposed component have been or
will be eliminated from the ongoing operations of the entity,
and the types of continuing involvement that constitute
significant continuing involvement in the operations of the
disposed component. If continuing cash flows are determined to
be direct, then the cash flows have not been eliminated and the
operations of the component should not be presented as
discontinued operations. If continuing cash flows are determined
to be indirect, then the cash flows are considered to be
eliminated and the operations of the component should be
presented as discontinued operations. In order to determine the
significance of the continuing involvement, consideration must
be given to the ability to influence the operating and or
financial policies of the disposed component, as well as the
retention of risk or the
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS — (Continued)
ability to obtain benefits. The Company applied the provisions
of EITF 03-13 to
components of an enterprise that are either disposed of or
classified a held for sale beginning January 1, 2005.
Share-Based Payments. In December 2004, the FASB issued
SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004), Share-Based
Payment, which is a revision of SFAS No. 123,
Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation.
SFAS No. 123(R) supersedes APB Opinion No. 25,
Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and amends
SFAS No. 95, Statement of Cash Flows.
Generally, the approach in SFAS No. 123(R) is similar
to the approach described in SFAS No. 123. However,
SFAS No. 123(R) requires all share-based payments to
employees, including grants of employee stock options, to be
recognized in the income statement based on their fair values.
Pro forma disclosure is no longer an alternative. Also,
SFAS No. 123(R) provides significant additional
guidance regarding the valuation of employee stock options.
While SFAS No. 123(R) does not require the use of a
specific option-pricing model, it does indicate that lattice
models usually will provide a better estimate of fair value of
an employee stock option. SFAS No. 123(R) must be
adopted by the Company no later than January 1, 2006. Early
adoption is permitted in periods in which financial statements
have not yet been issued. The Company does not believe that the
adoption of SFAS No. 123(R) will have a significant
impact on the consolidated financial statements.
In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS Statement
No. 153, Exchanges of Nonmonetary Assets, which
eliminates an exception in APB 29 for nonmonetary exchanges
of similar productive assets and replaces it with a general
exception for exchanges of nonmonetary assets that do not have
commercial substance. This Statement will be effective for the
Company for nonmonetary asset exchanges occurring on or after
January 1, 2006. The Company does not believe that the
adoption of SFAS No. 153 will have a significant
impact on the consolidated financial statements.
Determining the Amortization period for leasehold
improvements. In June 2005 the EITF reached a consensus on
EITF 05-6,
Determining the amortization period for leasehold improvements.
The issue is how to determine the amortization period for
leasehold improvements acquired subsequent to inception of
lease, including leasehold improvement acquired in a business
combination. For both cases the Task Force reached the consensus
that the leasehold improvements acquired should be amortized
over the shorter of the useful life of the assets and the
hypothetical lease term. This consensus does not apply to
preexisting improvements and it is effective for reporting
periods beginning after June 29, 2005. The Company does not
believe that the adoption of
EITF 05-6 will
have a significant impact on the consolidated financial
statements.
Accounting for Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income. In
July 2005 the Board issued FASB Staff Position APB 18-1:
Accounting by an investor for its proportionate share of
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income of an investee accounted
for under the Equity Method in accordance with APB 18 upon
a loss of significant influence. The Board believes that an
investor’s proportionate share of an investee’s equity
adjustments for OCI should be offset against the carrying value
of the investment at the time significant influence is lost. The
guidance on this FSP is effective as of the first reporting
period beginning after July 12, 2005. The Company does not
believe that the adoption of SFAS 154 will have a
significant impact on the consolidated financial statements.
Provision for litigation and contingent liabilities
515
658
610
Tax loss carryforwards
343
1,500
406
Customers’ connection fees
681
550
806
Measurement of financial assets
146
—
173
Deferred income
174
220
206
Other
821
479
972
Total deferred tax assets
2,680
4,160
3,173
Valuation allowances
(218
)
(595
)
(258
)
Total deferred tax assets, net
2,462
3,565
2,915
Deferred tax liabilities:
Other post retirement benefits accounting
(2
)
—
(2
)
Assets write-downs
(172
)
—
(204
)
Revaluation of utility plant
(95
)
(222
)
(112
)
Accelerated depreciation of utility plant
(1,640
)
(2,087
)
(1,942
)
Capitalization of interest on utility plant
(460
)
(465
)
(545
)
Equity reserves
(282
)
(581
)
(334
)
Other
(20
)
(356
)
(24
)
Total deferred tax liabilities
(2,671
)
(3,711
)
(3,163
)
Net deferred tax liabilities
(209
)
(146
)
(248
)
During the years ending December 31, 2004, and 2005 the
valuation allowance increased by euro 23 million, and
then reduced by euro 377 million respectively.
The tax loss carry forwards as of December 31, 2005 expire
as follows:
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS — (Continued)
It is not practicable to determine the amount of deferred tax
liability, if any, relating to the undistributed earnings of
Company’s foreign operations.
As of December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively, income tax
has been allocated to each item in Other Comprehensive Income as
follows:
2005
2004
(millions of euro)
Minimum Pension Liabilities
(17
)
20
Investments in equity securities
2
(2
)
In assessing the realizability of deferred tax assets,
management considers whether it is more likely than not that
some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be
realized. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is
dependent upon the generation of future taxable income during
the periods in which those temporary differences become
deductible and tax loss carryforwards utilized. Management
considers the scheduled reversal of deferred tax liabilities,
projected future taxable income, and tax planning strategies in
making this assessment. Based upon the level of historical
taxable income and projections for future taxable income over
the periods in which the deferred tax assets are deductible,
management believes it is more likely than not that the Company
will realize the benefits of these deductible differences and
tax carryforwards, net of the existing valuation allowances at
December 31, 2005. The amount of the deferred tax asset
considered realizable, however, could be reduced in the near
term if estimates of future taxable income during the
carryforward period are reduced.
(b)
Earnings per Share
The computation of basic and diluted earnings per share for the
years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004, in accordance with
U.S. GAAP, are as follows:
2005
2004
2005
(millions of
(millions of euro)*
U.S. dollars)*
Income available to common shareholders
4,698
1,031
5,563
Weighted average shares — basic (in millions)
6,142
6,087
6,142
Weighted average shares — diluted (in millions)
6,171
6,215
6,171
Earnings per share-basic:
0.76
0.17
0.91
Earnings per share-diluted:
0.76
0.17
0.90
(*)
Except per-share data which is in euro and U.S. dollars.
(c)
Effects of Regulation
The Company is subject to the regulatory control of the Energy
Authority with additional oversight provided by numerous laws,
decrees and codes. The current regulatory tariff structure
provides the Company with recovery of certain levels of cost
through a price cap framework, and not necessarily its specific
cost of providing service. Accordingly, SFAS No. 71,
“Accounting for the Effects of Certain Types of
Regulation”, which relates to an entity whose rates are
regulated on an actual cost basis, is not currently applicable
to these Consolidated Financial Statements.
(d)
Derivatives
Under U.S. GAAP, derivatives that are not designated to
hedge specific transactions are accounted for at fair value with
gains and losses being recognized currently in the consolidated
statements of income. Specific hedges are accounted for as
hedges if they meet the qualifying criteria for hedge
accounting. The ineffective portion of effective hedge
relationships is recorded in earnings when required by
U.S. GAAP. The total ineffectiveness
Effective January 1, 2001, the Company adopted Statement of
Financial Accounting Standard No. 133
(“SFAS 133”), Accounting for Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities, which establishes accounting
and reporting standards for derivative instruments, including
certain derivative instruments embedded in other contracts
(embedded derivatives), and for hedging activities.
SFAS 133 requires that all derivatives, whether designated
in hedging relationships or not, must be recorded on the balance
sheet at fair value. The accounting for changes in fair value of
a derivative instrument depends on its intended use and the
resulting designation.
As of January 1, 2001, the Company classified for
U.S. GAAP purposes all of its derivative instruments into
different categories, for which the accounting are as follows:
•
For “cash flow hedges”, the effective portion of the
gain or loss from the derivative hedging instrument is
accumulated in other comprehensive income (“OCI”) and
recognized in earnings during the period that the hedged
forecasted transaction impacts earnings. The ineffective portion
of the gain or loss from the derivative hedging instrument is
recognized in earnings immediately.
•
For “fair value hedges”, the gain or loss on the
derivative instrument designated and qualifying as a fair value
hedging instrument as well as the offsetting loss or gain on the
hedged item attributable to the hedged risk is recognized
currently in earnings in the same accounting period.
•
For all other derivative contracts which do not qualify for the
special hedge accounting treatment under SFAS 133, gains
and losses are recorded in earnings each reporting period.
Under U.S. GAAP, a derivative instrument is defined as a
contract with all three of the following characteristics:
a. It has (1) one or more underlying and (2) one
or more notional amounts or payment provisions or both.
b. No initial net investment or an initial net investment
that is smaller than would be required for other types of
contracts that would be expected to have a similar response to
changes in market factors.
c. Its terms require or permit net settlement, it can
readily be settled net by a means outside the contract, or it
provides for delivery of an asset that puts the recipient in a
position not substantially different from net settlement.
Since the adoption of SFAS 133, the Company implemented a
control to identify and, if necessary, recognize any potential
derivatives or embedded derivatives. The Company subjected all
significant contracts to such control and found that its
contracts do not require valuation under SFAS 133 and
related interpretations. Furthermore, through December 31,2005, no embedded derivatives were required to be separated from
the underlying obligation and carried at fair value.
(d.2) Cash Flow Hedges
Enel’s cash flow hedges primarily include hedges of certain
floating rate medium and long-term debt.
The Company has swapped these variable interest rate liabilities
into fixed interest rate liabilities. Interest rate swaps are
the most common type of derivative contract used to modify
exposure to interest rate risk by converting floating rate
liabilities to fixed rate liabilities. Enel also enters into
Swaptions and Interest rate collars.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS — (Continued)
Enel’s cash flow hedges also include hedges of fixed rate
medium and long-term foreign currency debt. In order to hedge
the variability of the foreign functional currency equivalent
cash flows on the liabilities Enel has entered into combinations
of interest rate swaps to effectively switch the foreign fixed
interest rate debt into euro fixed interest debt. These
transactions must be viewed in combination and are designated
jointly as a hedging instrument. Enel entered also into specific
instruments in order to hedge the variability of the price of
the energy purchased on the Power Exchange Market.
In addition, the Company also enters into combinations of
interest rate swaps to switch the structured rate paid on
certain medium and long-term debt into fixed interest rate
outflows.
The breakdown of the hedging instruments, and the amounts
recognized in other comprehensive income (loss) are as follows
(gross of tax effect for +64 euro million and minority interest
for euro +8 million as of December 31, 2005):
Gains/
Reclassified
Gains/
Reclassified
Gains/
Reclassified
OCI at
Losses
to
OCI at
Losses
to
OCI at
Losses
to
OCI at
December
Recorded
Earnings
December
Recorded
Earnings
December
Recorded
Earnings
December
Type of Operation:
31, 2002
in 2003
in 2003
31, 2003
in 2004
in 2004
31, 2004
in 2005
in 2005
31, 2005
Interest rate swaps
(270
)
(29
)
14
(285
)
24
(106
)
(367
)
188
(80
)
(259
)
Interest rate collars
(4
)
(3
)
(7
)
11
(5
)
(1
)
1
0
Swaptions
(2
)
2
0
0
0
CFD with Single Buyer
0
57
57
Total
(276
)
(30
)
14
(292
)
35
(111
)
(368
)
246
(80
)
(202
)
Most of the gains recorded in 2005 are mainly due to the sale to
Weather of 62,75% of the share capital of Wind, due to the sale
of 43.85% of the share capital of Terna and to the
deconsolidation of the interest hedging instruments related to
those two companies.
For each transaction, Enel documents the hedging relationship,
the risk management objective and strategy for undertaking the
hedge, the nature of the risk being hedged, how Enel measures
ineffectiveness, and how the hedging instrument’s
effectiveness in offsetting the exposure to changes in the
hedged item’s cash flows attributable to the hedged risk
will be assessed.
For cash flow hedges, in prior years the Company elected under
U.S. GAAP to apply the shortcut method for certain hedging
relationships. Under U.S. GAAP, the Company continues to
apply the shortcut method for these hedging relationships.
However, since IFRS-EU do not contemplate the shortcut method,
up to the first time application of IFRS-EU, the Company
formally assesses for IFRS-EU purposes both at the inception of
the hedge and on an ongoing basis, whether the hedging
derivatives are highly effective in offsetting changes in cash
flows of hedged items. Under U.S. GAAP purposes, for new
hedging relationships the Company therefore does not apply the
shortcut method but performs prospective and retrospective
effectiveness testing. All components of each derivative’s
gain or loss are included in the assessment of hedge
effectiveness. When it is determined that a derivative is not
highly effective as a hedge, the Company discontinues hedge
accounting and recognizes changes in fair value of these
contracts directly in earnings.
The total ineffectiveness recorded in earnings during the years
ended December 31, 2005 and 2004 amounts to euro
0.9 million and euro 0.7 million respectively.
For all cash flow hedges, Enel recognizes all other changes in
fair value of the hedging instrument in other comprehensive
income and subsequently reclassifies them into earnings as the
hedged forecasted transaction impacts earnings.
The Company estimates that euro 62 million of net
derivative losses included in other comprehensive income as of
December 31, 2005 will be reclassified into earnings within
the next twelve months.
The Company enters into other derivative contracts used to
mitigate the effects of crude oil, electricity, gas, foreign
currency and interest rate price fluctuations. The Company has
decided not to formally designate these contracts as hedges of
specific assets, liabilities, firm commitments or anticipated
transactions under the provisions of SFAS 133. Accordingly,
the Company records these contracts at fair value with all
changes in fair value being recorded as a component of income
from continuing operations during the period that such contracts
remain outstanding and, based on the guidance of SFAS 52,
remeasures foreign-currency-denominated liabilities related to
these contracts to spot exchange rates.
Derivative instruments are reported on a net-by-counterparty
basis on the Consolidated Balance Sheet when a legal right of
setoff exists under an enforceable netting agreement.
(d.3) Notional Amounts and Credit Exposures of
Derivatives
The notional value of a derivative is the contractual amount on
the basis of which the differentials are exchanged; this amount
can be expressed either on a value basis or on a physical
quantities basis (such as tons, converted into euro by
multiplying the notional quantity by the fixed price). Amounts
expressed in currencies different from euro are converted into
euro by applying the exchange rate at the balance sheet date.
The notional amounts of derivatives summarized below do not
represent amounts exchanged by the parties and, thus, are not a
measure of the credit exposure of the Company.
Although the Company is exposed to credit-related losses in the
event of non-performance by counterparties to derivative
financial instruments, given the high credit standing of the
counterparties, the Company does not expect any default by these
parties in meeting their obligations.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS — (Continued)
(d.4) Interest Rate Risk Management
The Company enters into various types of interest rate contracts
in managing its interest rate risk. The financial instruments
utilized as of December 31, 2005 and 2004 were as follows:
Notional Amount
2005
2004
(millions of euro)
Interest rate swaps
4,866
9,633
Interest rate collars
62
690
Swaptions
69
60
Total
4,997
10,383
The Company enters into interest rate derivatives, particularly
interest rate swaps, with the purpose of decreasing the amount
of debt subject to interest rate fluctuations and to smooth the
cost of debt variability. Under interest rate swaps, the Company
agrees with other parties to exchange, at specified intervals,
the difference between interest amounts calculated by reference
to an agreed notional principal amount and agreed fixed or
floating interest rates.
The Company also enters into interest rate collar contracts to
reduce the potential impact of increases in interest rates on
floating-rate long-term debt. These agreements are normally
entered into when the fixed rate available under interest rate
swaps are considered too high with respect to the Company’s
view about the level of future interest rates. Moreover, the use
of interest rate collars is deemed appropriate under uncertainty
periods, in order to benefit from a possible decline in interest
rates. The Company normally uses zero-cost collars that do not
require payment of an option premium.
Swaptions provide the holder with the right to enter into an
interest rate swap in the future. The Company generally buys the
right to pay a fixed rate or sells the right to receive a fixed
rate should the option be exercised, in order to eventually lock
in a fixed rate hedging transaction at a rate lower than the
actual level.
contracts with a notional amount of euro 1,569 million
used to hedge the foreign exchange risk related to fuel
purchases, electricity imports and expected cash flows in
currencies other than the euro (euro 855 million as of
December 31, 2004); and
•
contracts with a notional amount of euro 35 million
used to hedge the foreign exchange risk related to the repayment
of the commercial paper the Company issued in foreign currency
(euro 715 million as of December 31, 2004).
The Company generally enters into these contracts with respect
to the same amount and date of the repayment obligation or the
cash flow that the Company expects to generate, thus any change
in fair value of these contracts deriving from a possible
appreciation or depreciation of the euro against the other
currencies is fully offset by a corresponding change in the fair
value of the underlying position.
At the end of 2005, the Company also had in place
euro 194 million of foreign exchange forward contracts
(euro 215 million as of December 31, 2004) and
euro 73 million of options (euro 85 million as of
December 31, 2004) used to hedge any residual foreign
exchange risk on an aggregated basis.
The Company uses forward exchange contracts and currency options
primarily to hedge expenses denominated in foreign currencies.
The accounts payable in currencies other than euro are
denominated mainly in U.S. dollars and Swiss francs. Both
“buy” and “sell” amounts of such contracts
are indicated at the notional value. Currency options, traded in
the over-the-counter
market, provide the Company with the right or the obligation to
buy or sell agreed amounts of currency at a specified exchange
rate at the end of a specified period, generally not exceeding
one year. Generally, the maturity of the Company’s forward
exchange contracts also does not exceed one year.
(d.6) Commodity Risk Management
At the end of 1999, the Company established a new company, Enel
Trade (formerly Enel F.T.L. — Fuel Trading and
Logistics) with the purpose of providing fuel to the individual
generation companies and gas to the sale and distribution
companies within Enel, to manage the Company’s risk in the
oil market and to develop fuel trading activities on the
international markets. Enel Trade started operations on
June 1, 2000.
In 2000, due to the significant volatility in the currency and
commodity market, and taking into consideration the next phase
of the Energy Market that could discontinue the Equalization
Fund mechanism (under Decree 70/1997), the Company adopted a
systematic approach to cover commodity pricing and currency risk
linked to the time lag present in the reimbursement mechanism.
Therefore, since 2000, Enel Trade has entered into derivative
contracts on commodities to fix part of the margin between the
costs and contribution received from the Authority under the
Equalization Fund mechanism in place until March 2004. Then, in
April 2004, the Italian power exchange became operational and
the Company became exposed to price risk arising from the
pricing mechanism based on competitive bidding among generation
companies. However, under the current regulatory framework,
generation companies may also sell electricity through
over-the-counter
bilateral contracts with buyers, and enter into contracts for
differences with the Single Buyer. Enel’s use of both
over-the-counter
bilateral contracts and contracts for differences with the
Single Buyer has contributed to reduced power exchange price
risk exposure.
The Company has entered into different transactions with the
intent to align revenues and costs through the management of oil
price risk in the international market. The derivative
instruments are based on benchmark indexes (for example, IPE
Brent, NYMEX, WTI) that are considered the most appropriate
instruments to hedge the oil index used and to fix the price for
fuel supplies. Any variation in the portfolio value of the
derivative
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS — (Continued)
contracts is offset by a corresponding variation of the market
value in the portfolio of the physical contracts, except for a
minor risk arising from the misalignment between the price index
of the oil supplies and the benchmark.
Under the commodity swap contracts, the Company establishes with
a counterparty the exchange, on a specific pricing period basis,
of the difference between the average of an index and the
predetermined fixed quantity value.
For futures contracts, the Company purchases
(sells) standardized contracts on the IPE —
International Petroleum Exchange and the NYMEX — New
York Mercantile Exchange. These contracts are subject to the
daily payment of the margins and, therefore, no credit default
risk exists.
Exposure due to fuel purchased for generation activity, gas
purchased and sold for trading activity, and to energy sold
through the Italian power exchange for which Enel does not enter
in contracts for differences with the Single Buyer, has been
managed by means of hedging instruments. As a result, our
overall volume of contracts to hedge commodity price risks at
December 31, 2005 slightly decreased as compared to
December 31, 2004.
Futures on commodities: no contracts existing at the
balance sheet date;
•
Options on commodities: no contracts existing at the
balance sheet date;
•
Swaps on petroleum indexes: euro 537.56 million or
4,133,000 tons;
•
Swaps on gas transmission fee: euro 17,9 million,
6 years and 1 billion cubic meters per year;
•
Contracts for differences: euro
5,133 million; and
•
National and International congestion contracts: euro
118 million.
(d.7) Fair Value of Financial
Instruments
As required by SFAS No. 107, “Disclosures about
Fair Value of Financial Instruments”, the Company has
estimated the fair values of its financial instruments held.
In the normal course of its business, the Company utilizes
various types of financial instruments. These instruments
include recorded assets and liabilities, as well as items that
principally involve off-balance sheet risks. Information about
the fair value of the Company’s financial instruments is
presented below.
•
Cash and cash equivalents: the carrying values of cash and cash
equivalents approximate their fair values because of their short
maturities.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS — (Continued)
•
Investments in equity securities classified as available for
sale: the carrying value of such investments reflects their fair
value as of the balance sheet date.
•
Short-term debt: the carrying value of short-term debt
approximates fair value because of the short period of time
between the origination and maturity of the borrowings.
•
Other noncurrent assets: the carrying value of such assets
reflects their fair value as of the balance sheet date.
•
Bonds payable-listed: the fair value of bonds payable-listed is
based upon period-end market prices.
•
Other bonds and long-term debt (including current maturities):
the fair values of other bonds and long-term debt (including
current maturities) are based on discounted cash flow analysis.
Other bonds and long-term debt, including current maturities
5,520
5,573
14,212
14,207
Derivative financial instruments: the fair value of derivatives
generally reflects the estimated amounts that the Company would
pay or receive to terminate the contracts at the reporting date,
thereby taking into account the current unrealized gains or
losses of open contracts. Appropriate pricing models and current
market input data (such as volatility, interest rate curves and
foreign exchange rates) have been used to estimate the fair
value of the Company’s derivatives.
As of
December, 31
2005
2004
Fair Value
(millions of
euro)
Interest rate swaps
(315
)
(408
)
— assets
12
46
— liabilities
(327
)
(454
)
Interest rate collars
—
(13
)
— assets
—
—
— liabilities
—
(13
)
Swaptions
—
—
— assets
—
—
— liabilities
—
—
Total interest rate derivatives
(315
)
(421
)
— assets
12
46
— liabilities
(327
)
(467
)
Forward exchange contracts relating to commodity hedging
(5
)
(34
)
— assets
6
—
— liabilities
(11
)
(34
)
Forward exchange contracts relating to hedge of commercial papers
National and international congestion contracts differences
—
—
— assets
—
—
— liabilities
—
—
Total
(239
)
(487
)
— assets
548
81
— liabilities
(787
)
(568
)
(23)
SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
(a)
Sale of stake in Wind
On February 8, 2006, Enel and Weather Investments, a
company controlled by Egyptian businessman Naguib Sawiris,
completed the second and final phase of the sale of Wind.
Specifically, Enel sold, following the exercise of the call
option provided for in the agreements of May 2005, a holding of
6.28% of Wind to a subsidiary of Weather for
euro 328 million in cash. Enel also transferred to
Weather its remaining 30.97% stake in Wind — valued at
approximately euro 1,655 million on the basis of an
independent appraisal submitted by Enel as required by
law — in exchange for shares representing 20.9% of
Weather. Taking into account the 5.2% of Weather acquired in
August in the first phase of the transaction, the transfer gave
Enel a total holding of 26.1% in Weather.
Following the two phases of the Wind disposal, Weather directly
and indirectly holds the entire capital of Wind, as well as a
stake of 50% plus one share in Orascom Telecom Holding SAE (one
of the largest mobile telephony operators in Africa, the Middle
East and Asia). The Company has received from Weather
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS — (Continued)
euro 3,009 million net in cash and a holding of 26.1%
of Weather with a value of approximately
euro 1,960 million.
(b)
Sale of Carbones Colombianos del Cerrejon (CCC)
On February 8, 2006, Enel finalized the sale of 100% of
Carbones Colombianos del Cerrejon for a total net price of
approximately euro 38 million. The company engages in
exploration, feasibility assessment and extraction (the latter
at a coal mine in the Guaijra region of Colombia) activities in
mines and mineral deposits.
(c)
New acquisition in Russia
Following the Memorandum of Understanding signed on
March 6, 2006, Enel has on June 21, 2006 finalized the
acquisition of a stake in the Russian power supplier
RusEnergoSbyt (Res), a company associated with Grigory Berezkin,
Chairman of Board of Directors of the ESN Group.
In particular, Enel’s Dutch subsidiary Enel Investment
Holding has acquired a 49.5% interest in Res Holdings, a Dutch
company owning 100% of Res, for a consideration of
$105 million, according to the terms of the MoU.
Enel will gain access to the electricity market of the Russian
Federation in collaboration with the largest supplier in the
Russian power sector, which has been operating in the wholesale
and retail markets since 2003. With this transaction Enel
strengthens its position in the Russian market, where the
Company has operated since 2004, managing the combined-cycle
North West Thermal Power Plant in St. Petersburg under an
agreement with RAO UES.
(d)
Disposal of power distribution and sale assets
On March 13, 2006, Enel and Hera SpA signed a preliminary
agreement for the disposal of the power grid of 18 towns in the
province of Modena. The price was set at
euro 107.5 million, of which an advance payment of
euro 17.5 million has been received. The business unit
includes more than 3,700 km of network, about
80,000 customers and 42 employees. The transaction marks
the completion of the agreement reached in the protocol of
understanding signed in February 2005 between Enel and Meta
Modena SpA, which has been merged into Hera SpA since
January 1, 2006.
On April 11, 2006 the Minister for Productive activities
signed the decree transferring the concession to Hera. The
closing of the agreement, which is expected to take place by the
end of this year, is subject to approval by the antitrust
authorities.
(e)
Acquisition of Slovenské Elektrįrne
On April 28, 2006 Enel, in line with the terms of the
contract signed on February 17, 2005, acquired 66% of
Slovenské Elektrįrne (SE), the largest generating
company in Slovakia and the second-largest in Central and
Eastern Europe. SE has a plant portfolio with an installed
capacity of approximately 7,000 MW (with 83% of the
domestic market) well balanced between thermal, hydro and
nuclear, which guarantees electricity generation at highly
competitive costs. The price for the operation was about
euro 840 million, on which Enel had paid a deposit of
euro 168 million in 2005.
As envisaged in the agreement signed in February 2005, the
assets related to a nuclear plant slated for decommissioning in
the coming years (EBOV1) and the hydro plant of Gabcikovo, as
well as a nuclear waste treatment plant (VYZ) were
separated from the rest of the company before the closing. SE
will sell the power generated by the two EBOV1 nuclear
facilities until they are decommissioned in 2006 and 2008 and
that produced by the Gabcikovo hydro plant for 30 years.
Enel, the National Property Fund and the Ministry for the
Economy also agreed on the terms of an investment plan aimed at
increasing output and enhancing the efficiency
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS — (Continued)
and environmental compatibility of Slovenské
Elektrąrne’s power plants, contributing to the
economic and social development of Slovakia and boosting company
profitability. The plan provides for investment of about
euro 2 billion between 2006 and 2013.
(f)
Binding offers
On April 24, 2006 Enel made a binding offer for the
purchase of 90% of Paroplinovy Cyklus a.s. Bratislava
(“PPC”), a company that owns a combined-cycle
cogeneration plant of about 220 MW. The remaining 10% is
owned by Slovenské Elektrįrne.
(g)
Transfer to Union Fenosa of 30% stake of Enel Union Fenosa
Renovables
On May 30,2006 Enel and Union Fenosa completed the sale of
30% of Enel Union Fenosa Renovables, as Union Fenosa exercised a
call option to acquire the shares from Enel. The Company and
Union Fenosa now control 50% of EUFER share capital, in line
with the agreement signed in 2003, and they have the joint
management of EUFER, with each company having four
representatives on the eight-member Board of Directors. Union
Fenosa paid Enel euro 66 million plus interest of
euro 5.8 million, bringing the total value of the
transaction to euro 71.8 million.
(h)
New acquisition in Romania
On June 5, 2006 Enel won the call for tenders organised by
the Romanian government for the sale of a majority stake in the
Electrica Muntenia Sud power distribution company (EMS), beating
out offers from numerous major European energy groups.
Enel offered euro 820 million to acquire 67.5% of EMS.
The price includes both the sale of the shares and a
simultaneous capital increase. EMS serves the capital Bucharest
and the surrounding regions of Ilfov and Giurgiu. It has about
2,000 employees, and in 2005 it had revenues of about
euro 398 million and net income of approximately
euro 20 million.
(i)
New acquisition in Brazil
On June 9, 2006 Enel Latin America and the Brazilian
company Rede Empresas de Energia Eléctrica SA and its
subsidiaries Rede Power do Brasil SA and Tocantins Energia SA
(as vendors) have signed an agreement in Sćo Paulo for the
sale of the entire share capital of 11 companies in the
Rede Group that hold concessions for 22 mini-hydroelectric
plants with a total installed capacity of 97.68 MW. The
consideration for the transaction totals 450 million reals,
equal to about 155 million euro at the current exchange
rate.
The closing of the transaction is subject to a number of
conditions precedent, including the approval of the ANEEL (the
Brazilian electricity authority).
(j)
New acquisition in Bulgaria
On June 16, 2006, the Company has purchased from Entergy
Power Bulgaria Ltd (Entergy) 40% of Maritza East III Power
Holding B.V., a Dutch company that owns 73% of Maritza
East III Power Company AD.
The Company has also purchased from Entergy the entire share
capital of Maritza O&M Holding Netherlands B.V., a Dutch
company that owns 73% of Maritza East 3 Operating Company AD, a
Bulgarian company that operates and maintains the Maritza
East III power plant. The remaining 27% of both Bulgarian
companies is still owned by NEK, the Bulgarian national
electricity company.
Enel has paid Entergy a total
of €47.5 million
to buy the stakes in Maritza East III Power Holding B.V.
(40%) and Maritza O&M Holding Netherlands B.V. (100%).
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of Wind
Telecomunicazioni SpA
1
We have audited the consolidated balance sheets of Wind
Telecomunicazioni SpA (an Italian corporation) and its
subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31,2004, and the related consolidated statements of income, of
changes in shareholders’ equity and of cash flows for the
year then ended (expressed in Euro). These financial statements
are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements based on our audits.
2
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
3
The consolidated financial statements as of December 31,2004 do not include comparative information and notes for 2003
that would be required to present the financial position, the
result of operations and the cash flows in conformity with
International Financial Reporting Standards as adopted by EU. As
described in the notes, in fact, these consolidated financial
statements are intended to comprise the comparative financial
statements to the year ended December 31, 2005, which will
be the first IFRS compliant consolidated financial statements.
4
In our opinion, except for the matter reported in the previous
paragraph regarding the omission of comparative financial
information for 2003, the consolidated financial statements
referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the
financial position of Wind Telecomunicazioni SpA and its
subsidiaries as of December 31, 2004 and the results of
their operations and their cash flows for the year then ended,
in conformity with the International Financial Reporting
Standards issued by the International Accounting Standards Board
as adopted by EU.
5
We draw your attention to the matters regarding deferred tax
assets and intangible assets as described in the notes to the
consolidated financial statements.
6
International Financial Reporting Standards vary in certain
significant respects from accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America. Information relating
to the nature and effect of such differences is presented in the
notes to the consolidated financial statements under the caption
US GAAP schedules and additional disclosures.
The registrant hereby certifies that it meets all of the
requirements for filing on Form 20-F and has duly caused
this annual report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.