Document/ExhibitDescriptionPagesSize 1: 20-F Annual Report of a Foreign Private Issuer HTML 2.56M
2: EX-1.1 Underwriting Agreement HTML 69K
3: EX-4.1 Instrument Defining the Rights of Security Holders HTML 202K
4: EX-8.1 Opinion re: Tax Matters HTML 81K
5: EX-12.1 Statement re: Computation of Ratios HTML 12K
6: EX-13.1 Annual or Quarterly Report to Security Holders HTML 8K
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
ENEL S.p.A.
(Translation of registrant’s name into English)
Italy
(Jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
Viale Regina Margherita 137, Rome, Italy
(Address of principal executive offices)
Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to
Section 12(b) of the Act.
Title of Each Class
Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered
American Depositary Shares
Ordinary shares with a par value of
€1 each
New York Stock Exchange
New York Stock Exchange(*)
Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to
Section 12(g) of the Act:
None
(Title of Class)
Securities for which there is a reporting obligation pursuant
to Section 15(d) of the Act:
None
(Title of Class)
Indicate the number of outstanding shares of each of the
issuer’s classes of capital or common stock as of the close
of the period covered by the annual report.
6,103,521,864 Ordinary Shares
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed
all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark which financial statement item the
registrant has elected to follow.
Item 17 o Item 18 þ
(*) Not for trading, but only in connection with the
registration of the American Depositary Shares.
Unless we indicate otherwise, the financial information
contained in this annual report is prepared in accordance with
Italian GAAP, which are the accounting principles prescribed by
Italian law, and supplemented by the accounting principles
issued by the Consiglio Nazionale dei Dottori Commercialisti
e dei Ragioneri (National Board of Chartered Accountants)
and, to the extent such requirements or principles are silent on
particular issues and not at variance, by those standards laid
down by the International Accounting Standards Board (I.A.S.B.).
These principles are described in note 2 to our
consolidated financial statements included in this annual
report. These principles differ in certain respects from
generally accepted accounting principles in the United States
(“U.S. GAAP”). We describe these differences in
notes 24-26 to our consolidated financial statements.
Unless indicated otherwise, any reference in this annual report
to our consolidated financial statements is to the consolidated
financial statements (including the notes to the consolidated
financial statements) included in Item 18.
In June 2002, the Council of Ministers of the European Union
(the “EU”) approved a regulation requiring all
EU-listed companies, including the Company, to apply
International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”)
in preparing their financial statements for fiscal years
beginning on or after January 1, 2005. Beginning with our
quarterly report for the quarter ended March 31, 2005, we
publish our financial statements in accordance with IFRS. Please
see “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and
Prospects — Transition to International Financial
Reporting Standards.”
We publish our consolidated financial statements in euros. In
this annual report, unless we specify otherwise or the context
otherwise requires:
•
References to “dollars,”“$” and
“U.S. dollars” are to United States dollars;
•
References to “lire,”“lira” or
“Lit.” are to Italian lire; and
•
References to
“€” or
“euro” are to the euro, the single currency
established for participants in the third stage of the European
Economic and Monetary Union, or EMU, commencing January 1,1999.
To facilitate a comparison, all lire-denominated financial data
for periods prior to January 1, 2001, included in this
annual report have been restated from lire to euro at the fixed
rate as of December 31, 1998 established by the European
Central Bank of Lit. 1,936.27 =
€1.00.
For convenience only and except where we specify otherwise, we
have translated certain euro figures into dollars at the rate of
€1.00 = $1.3538,
the noon buying rate in The City of New York for cable transfers
in foreign currencies as announced by the Federal Reserve Bank
of New York for customs purposes (the “noon buying
rate”) on December 31, 2004, the date of the most
recent balance sheet included in this annual report. By
including convenience currency translations in this annual
report, we are not representing that the euro amounts actually
represent the dollar amounts shown or could be converted into
dollars at the rates indicated. On May 31, 2005, the noon
buying rate for the euro was
€1.00 = $1.2349.
For information about the rate of exchange between the dollar
and the euro since January 1, 2000, you should read
“Item 3. Key Information — Exchange
Rates.”
Market share information and statistics
Unless otherwise specified or the context requires otherwise,
references in this annual report to statistical, market and
forecast data have been obtained or derived from industry
sources and other publicly available information, such as
industry reports published by the Gestore della Rete and the
Energy Authority. Certain data may be revised from that
presented in our annual reports on Form 20-F for prior
years to reflect subsequent updates to, or changes in, such
data. Unless otherwise indicated, statistical data and other
information presented herein regarding market trends and our
market position relative to competitors represent our best
estimates as of the date hereof based on data derived from
publicly available sources or other information obtained from
independent third parties. Although we believe that such sources
are reliable, we have not independently verified such
information.
iii
Adjustments
Certain figures included in this annual report have been subject
to rounding adjustments. Accordingly, figures shown for the same
category presented in different tables may vary slightly and
figures shown as totals in certain tables may not be an
arithmetic aggregation of the figures which precede them.
iv
GLOSSARY
In this annual report, “Enel” and the
“Company” refer to ENEL S.p.A. and the terms
“Enel Group,”“Group,”“we,”“us” and “our” refer to ENEL S.p.A. together
with its consolidated subsidiaries. In this document, when we
use the word “currently,” we mean as of the date of
this annual report.
The following are definitions of certain terms and abbreviations
that we use in this report. The explanations of
electricity-related terms are not technical definitions, but are
intended to assist you in understanding their meaning.
Antitrust Authority
The Italian Antitrust Authority.
Average thermal efficiency
A measure of the efficiency of a thermal generating plant in
converting sources of energy such as fuel oil into electricity.
Average thermal efficiency is expressed as the amount of
electricity actually produced in kWh as a percentage of the kWh
equivalent of the energy source consumed.
Bersani Decree
Legislative Decree No. 79 of March 16, 1999, aimed at
liberalizing the Italian electricity market.
CIP 6
Regulation 6/32 issued by Comitato Interministeriale
Prezzi, an Italian governmental committee, which established
incentives for new generation plants using renewable resources
and for the sale of electricity produced from renewable
resources.
CO2
Carbon dioxide.
Combined Cycle Gas Turbine (or “CCGT”)
A type of generating plant that produces electricity through
both gas turbines and steam turbines. Conventional boilers or
other generators recover and use the exhaust heat exiting from
gas turbines.
Co-generation
The simultaneous generation of steam and electricity, typically
where the need arises for industrial purposes.
Communications Authority
The Italian Authority for the Guarantee of Communications.
Decommissioning
The phase of declassification, decontamination and dismantling
of nuclear power installations and clean up of the plant site
with the aim of achieving: (i) the complete demolition of
the nuclear power plant; (ii) the removal of any limitation
due to the presence of radioactive material; and (iii) the
restoration of the site for other activities.
Eligible Customer
Electricity customers in Italy who meet consumption thresholds
that permit them to participate in the free market for
electricity.
Emission trading rights
Tradable emission permits that give the right to produce the
equivalent of one metric ton of carbon dioxide. These permits
can either be assigned through a national allowance plan,
purchased on the market, or earned through investments in
projects in developing countries (Certified Emission Reductions)
or in transition economies countries (Emission Reduction Units).
Energy Authority
The Italian Authority for Electric Energy and Gas.
Environment Ministry
The Italian Ministry of the Environment.
Gencos
The three generating companies we disposed of in order to comply
with the Bersani Decree, Elettrogen S.p.A. (now Endesa Italia
v
S.p.A.), Eurogen S.p.A. (now Edipower S.p.A.) and Interpower
S.p.A. (now Tirreno Power S.p.A.).
Generating unit
An electric generator together with the turbine or other device
which drives it.
Gestore della Rete
The Gestore della Rete di Trasmissione Nazionale S.p.A., a
company owned by the MEF that currently manages Italy’s
national electricity transmission grid, and also owns the Single
Buyer and the Market Operator (both as defined below).
Gigawatt (GW)
1,000,000,000 watts (1,000 megawatts).
Gigawatt hour (GWh)
One gigawatt of power supplied or demanded for one hour.
GHG
“Greenhouse gases,” which are gases that contribute to
the greenhouse effect, such as carbon dioxide, methane, nitrous
oxide, chlorofluorocarbons and ozone.
Gross installed capacity
The maximum power that can be produced continuously throughout a
prolonged period of operation with all equipment assumed to be
fully operational.
Independent power producers
Industrial companies that produce electricity for their own use
and for sale to third parties.
Italian power exchange (Borsa dell’Energia Elettrica)
A virtual marketplace in which producers, importers,
wholesalers, the Gestore della Rete, other Eligible Customers
and the Single Buyer buy and sell electricity at prices
determined through a competitive bidding process.
Kilovolt (kV)
1,000 volts.
Kilovolt ampere (kVA)
1,000 volts ampere.
Kilowatt (kW)
1,000 watts.
Kilowatt hour (kWh)
One kilowatt of power supplied or demanded for one hour.
Market Operator
The entity, wholly owned by the Gestore della Rete, that manages
the Italian power exchange.
Marzano Law
Law No. 239 of August 23, 2004, aimed at reorganizing
existing energy market regulation and further liberalizing the
energy market.
MEF
The Italian Ministry of the Economy and Finance and its
predecessor, the Ministry of the Treasury, Budget and Economic
Planning.
Megawatt (MW)
1,000,000 watts (1,000 kilowatts).
Megawatt hour (MWh)
One megawatt of power supplied or demanded for one hour.
Megavolt ampere (MVA)
1,000,000 volts ampere.
Ministry of Productive Activities
The Italian Ministry of Productive Activities and its
predecessor, the Ministry of Industry, Commerce and Handcrafts.
Net Installed Capacity
The maximum power that can be produced continuously throughout a
prolonged period of operation with all equipment assumed to be
fully operational, as measured at the point of entry to the
transmission network (or minus the power absorbed by plant use
and the power lost in the transformers required to raise the
voltage to the network level).
vi
Non-Eligible Customers
Electricity customers in Italy who do not meet consumption
thresholds entitling them to participate in the free market.
NH3
Ammonia.
NOx
Nitrogen oxides.
Orimulsion
Abbreviation of “Orinoco emulsion,” which is a fossil
fuel from the Orinoco river basin in Venezuela consisting of
very fine bitumen dispersed in water. Orimulsion emits the same
amount of CO2 as fuel oil of equivalent energy value.
Resellers
Other distribution companies to whom we transport electricity
because their networks are attached to our network rather than
directly to the national transmission grid.
Single Buyer (Acquirente Unico)
A company wholly owned by the Gestore della Rete, responsible
for ensuring the supply of electricity to regulated customers
who do not yet have access to the liberalized electricity market.
SO2
Sulfur dioxide.
Substation
Equipment which switches and/or changes or regulates the voltage
of electricity in a transmission and/or distribution network.
Terawatt (TW)
1,000,000,000,000 watts (1,000 gigawatts).
Terawatthour (TWh)
One terawatt of power supplied or demanded for one hour.
Thermal unit
A generating unit which uses combustible fuel as the source of
energy to drive an electric generator.
Volt
The basic unit of electric force.
Voltampere
The basic unit of apparent electrical power.
Watt
The basic unit of active electrical power.
vii
PART I
ITEM 1.
IDENTITY OF DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND ADVISORS
Not applicable.
ITEM 2.
OFFER STATISTICS AND EXPECTED TIMETABLE
Not applicable.
ITEM 3.
KEY INFORMATION
The Enel Group
We are the principal electricity operator in Italy, with the
leading position in the generation, distribution and sale of
electricity. At December 31, 2004, we had net installed
capacity in Italy of approximately 42.0 GW, which we
estimate to have been approximately 52% of total Italian net
installed capacity at that date. Our net electricity production
in Italy in 2004 was 125.9 TWh, and, based on data provided by
the Gestore della Rete, we estimate that our production
represented approximately 44% of Italian net production during
2004. In 2004, in Italy, we distributed 261.2 TWh of electricity
and sold 157.8 TWh of electricity to end users. Of the total
sold, 137.0 TWh were sold to approximately 29.8 million
customers on the regulated market, of which approximately
23.2 million were residential customers, which we estimate
were approximately 87% of all residential customers in Italy,
and 20.8 TWh were sold on the free market. At December 31,2004, we also had electricity generation plants outside Italy
(in Spain, Bulgaria and North, Central and South America) with
aggregate net installed capacity of approximately 3.9 GW, as
well as sales and distribution operations in Spain with more
than 600,000 customers. In addition, in early 2005, we agreed to
acquire generation operations in Slovakia with a net installed
capacity of approximately 6,900 MW, and in April 2005 we
acquired distribution and sales operations in Romania with
approximately 1.4 million customers. Based on revenues, we
were one of the largest industrial companies in Italy in 2004,
with operating revenues of
€36,489 million,
or $49,399 million. We earned net income of
€2,706 million,
or $3,663 million, in 2004.
We are also active in the import, distribution and sale of
natural gas. In 2004, we sold approximately 6.9 billion
cubic meters of gas to third parties, of which approximately
5.2 billion cubic meters were sold to nearly 2 million
end users.
Enel is in the process of divesting most of its current 36.14%
interest in Terna S.p.A. (“Terna”), the principal
Italian electricity transmission company, having entered into an
agreement with Cassa Depositi e Prestiti (“Cassa Depositi e
Prestiti”) to sell a 29.99% stake in Terna in May 2005. We
also in May 2005 entered into an agreement for the sale, in a
series of transactions, of our wholly owned subsidiary Wind
Telecomunicazioni S.p.A. (“Wind”). Wind with its
subsidiaries constitutes our Telecommunications Division,
offering fixed-line telephony, mobile telephony and Internet
services.
We are also active in other sectors, including engineering and
construction, information technology and facility management.
We currently operate our businesses through six separate
divisions: Generation and Energy Management; Sales,
Infrastructure and Networks; Transmission; Telecommunications;
Services and Other Activities; and Corporate. Please see
“Item 4. Information on the Company —
Business” for more information about our businesses.
The Ministry of Economy and Finance of the Republic of Italy, or
the MEF, currently owns approximately 31.3% of Enel’s
shares, and Cassa Depositi e Prestiti S.p.A., a company
70%-owned by the MEF and 30%-owned by a consortium of Italian
banking foundations, owns approximately 10.2% of Enel’s
shares. The MEF has announced plans to sell an interest of
approximately 10% in the Company in a public offering in Italy
and a private placement to international institutional investors
that will not be registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended (the “Securities Act”), by September 2005,
market conditions permitting.
We have worked to face the challenges posed by market
deregulation by capitalizing on our expertise in the electricity
and gas sectors and by seeking new opportunities for growth in
Italy and abroad. We have
1
refocused our operations on our core energy businesses, and we
aim to achieve cost leadership in the generation, distribution
and sale of electricity and gas, and make customer care a high
priority. In addition, we will continue to evaluate
strategically relevant international opportunities, both in new
markets and in our existing markets, such as Spain, Bulgaria and
Romania and, in the area of renewable energy, in North, Central
and South America.
Selected Consolidated Financial Data
You should read the following selected consolidated financial
data together with “Item 5. Operating and Financial
Review and Prospects” and our consolidated financial
statements and notes thereto included elsewhere in this annual
report.
Our consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto
included herein have been prepared in accordance with Italian
GAAP, which differs in certain important respects from
U.S. GAAP. For an explanation and quantification of such
differences, see notes 24 through 26 to our consolidated
financial statements included herein.
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities
(1,510
)
2,598
(774
)
(2,426
)
(3,582
)
4,849
Amounts in accordance with U.S. GAAP(6):
Net cash provided by operating activities
€
4,937
€
5,554
€
3,815
€
6,843
€
4,855
$
6,573
Net cash used in investing activities
(3,468
)
(8,707
)
(4,241
)
(4,730
)
(1,940
)
(2,627
)
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities
(1,509
)
3,249
239
(2,061
)
(3,003
)
(4,065
)
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
Operating Data (unaudited)
Net installed capacity (GW) in Italy
56.3
50.0
43.8
(12)
41.8
42.0
Net electricity production in Italy (TWh)
182.5
169.1
(13)
145.1
(14)
137.8
125.9
Electricity sales to end users in Italy (TWh)(15)
213.3
194.9
181.3
152.2
157.8
Total electricity distributed in Italy (TWh)(16)
244.5
256.3
258.0
265.0
261.2
Natural gas sold to end users (billions of cubic meters)
0.3
1.1
4.0
4.4
5.2
Natural gas sales customers at year end (millions)
0.1
0.6
1.7
1.8
2.0
Employees
72,647
72,661
71,204
64,770
61,898
(1)
Lira amounts relating to the fiscal years 2000 and 2001 have
been translated into euro amounts at the fixed rate of Lit.
1,936.27 = €1.00.
(2)
We have translated euro amounts into dollar amounts at the noon
buying rate for euro on December 31, 2004, of
€1.00 = $1.3538.
3
(3)
Under Italian GAAP, for the year ended December 31, 2000,
we accounted for our investment in Wind, the lead company of our
Telecommunications Division, under the equity method of
accounting. We have consolidated Wind on a line-by-line basis
since January 1, 2001. You should read note 2 to our
consolidated financial statements for a discussion of our
consolidation principles. For purposes of U.S. GAAP, we
have consolidated Wind since January 1, 2000.
(4)
You should read notes 24-26 to our consolidated financial
statements for a discussion of the different criteria used under
Italian GAAP and U.S. GAAP for determining what constitutes
an extraordinary item.
(5)
We calculate earnings per share by dividing our consolidated net
income by the number of ordinary shares outstanding during each
period. Prior to our initial public offering in November 1999,
all of our ordinary shares were owned by the MEF. Following the
offering, and at December 31, 2004, the MEF owned 31.45%
and its subsidiary Cassa Depositi e Prestiti owned 10.28% of our
ordinary shares. You should consider that our share capital was
Lit. 12,126,150,379,000 (corresponding to
€6,262,634,023)
divided into 12,126,150,379 shares with a par value of each
share of Lit. 1,000 (corresponding to
€0.52) until
July 9, 2001, the date on which both the re-denomination of
our share capital in euros and a one-for-two reverse stock split
became effective. As a result of the re-denomination and the
reverse stock split, our share capital amounted to
€6,063,075,189,
divided into 6,063,075,189 shares, each with a par value of
€1. Currently,
our share capital amounts to
€6,124,838,588
divided into 6,124,838,588 shares with a par value of
€1.
(6)
For information concerning differences between Italian GAAP and
U.S. GAAP that are relevant to our consolidated financial
statements, you should read notes 24 through 26 to our
consolidated financial statements.
(7)
You should read notes 24-26 to our consolidated financial
statements for a discussion of the different criteria used under
Italian GAAP and U.S. GAAP in calculating operating income.
(8)
Includes gain on sale of Elettrogen, previously classified as
other non-operating income (expense).
(9)
Includes gain on sale of Eurogen, previously classified as other
non-operating income (expense).
(10)
Includes current portion of long-term debt.
(11)
Excludes current portion of long-term debt.
(12)
Including 2.6 GW of capacity of Interpower, which was divested
in January 2003.
(13)
Including 12.2 TWh generated by Elettrogen and Valgen before
they were divested during 2001, and 20.9 TWh generated by
Eurogen, which was divested in May 2002.
(14)
Including 8.0 TWh generated by Eurogen before it was divested,
and 5.7 TWh generated by Interpower.
(15)
Excluding sales to resellers.
(16)
Including electricity distributed to resellers.
4
Exchange Rates
The following table shows, for the periods indicated,
information concerning the exchange rate between the
U.S. dollar and the euro. These rates are provided solely
for your convenience. We do not represent that the euro could be
converted into U.S. dollars at these rates or at any other
rate.
The column of averages in the table below shows the averages of
the relevant exchange rates on the last business day of each
month during the relevant period. The high and low columns show
the highest and lowest exchange rates on any business day during
the relevant period.
Based on the noon buying rate for the euro for the periods
indicated.
Our ordinary shares are quoted in euros on Mercato Telematico
Azionario (“Telematico”), the Italian automated
screen-based trading market managed by Borsa Italiana S.p.A.
(“Borsa Italiana”). Our American Depositary Shares
(“ADSs”) are quoted in U.S. dollars and traded on
the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”).
Risk Factors
You should carefully consider the risks described below and
all of the other information in this document. If any of the
risks described below actually occurs, our business, economic
and financial results and the trading price of Enel’s
ordinary shares or ADSs could be materially adversely
affected.
Risks Relating to Our Energy Business
Future regulation could have a significant adverse effect
on our energy businesses and their profitability
Future laws and regulations issued by the European Union or the
Italian national and local authorities, in particular the
decisions and policies of the Energy Authority, may require
significant changes in our business or otherwise affect our
business in ways that we cannot predict. Any new regulations
that cause us to restructure or otherwise change our business or
significantly change the conditions under which we operate may
have a material adverse effect on our business prospects,
financial condition and results of operations. You should read
“Item 4. Information on the Company —
Regulatory Matters” for a discussion of these regulatory
matters.
Regulatory changes promoting market liberalization have
significantly increased competition in our energy
businesses
The Italian energy markets have been the object of numerous
regulatory initiatives designed to foster liberalization. The
most significant effects of these initiatives on the Italian
electricity market have been (i) a reduction in our
generating capacity (through the mandatory disposal of three
generating companies, the
5
Gencos); (ii) the introduction of limits on the amount of
energy we may produce and import; (iii) the introduction on
April 1, 2004, of the Italian power exchange, where prices
are determined by competitive bidding; (iv) the required
disposal of certain of our municipal networks to local
utilities; and (v) mandated increases in the number of
consumers who are eligible to buy electricity on the free market
(with all non-residential customers having become eligible as of
July 1, 2004, and all customers scheduled to become
eligible as of July 1, 2007).
In the generation business, our competitors include independent
power producers, municipal utilities and other operators of
electricity generating capacity, including Italian and
international power companies. In addition to the introduction
on April 1, 2004, of the Italian power exchange, we expect
that competition will increase further due to:
•
an increase in bilateral contracts between our competitors and
final customers;
•
regulations limiting each operator’s access to
international electricity sources to a maximum percentage of
available interconnection capacity; and
•
the construction of new generation facilities by our competitors
and the development of new interconnection lines that will
increase the volume of electricity that may be imported in Italy.
In addition, in March 2005, the Energy Authority issued a
decision announcing its intention to adopt measures to promote
competition in the wholesale electricity market and limit the
impact of market power held by dominant producers. On
May 7, 2005, the Energy Authority issued several proposals
for public comment by June 10, 2005, including (i) the
required disposal by us of additional generating capacity,
(ii) the required lease by us to third parties of
generating capacity, and (iii) the partial entrusting to
the Gestore della Rete of the management of certain power plants
deemed essential to cover electricity demand. Please see
“Item 4. Information on the Company —
Regulatory Matters — Electricity
Regulation — The Italian Power Exchange” for
additional information on these proposals.
In the sale of electricity, based on data from the Gestore della
Rete, we estimate that our market share in Italy has decreased
from 92% in 1999 to approximately 50% in 2004; our market share
could decline further in coming years as liberalization
progresses. In sales of electricity on the free market, we face
competition both from other electricity producers as well as
from wholesalers that resell the electricity they purchase.
Our ability to expand our business and increase operating
profits may be limited unless we are able to offset the decrease
in generation and sales volumes of our electricity business
through improved efficiency, increased sales in other areas of
our business or international expansion.
Our entry into the gas sector also exposes us to risks relating
to market regulation. Italian regulations enacted in May 2000
have sought to introduce competition gradually into the Italian
natural gas market. In particular, these regulations have eased
entry into some activities, including the import, export and
sale of gas. Furthermore, from January 1, 2003, gas sales
were supposed to be completely liberalized, with all customers
eligible to choose their supplier and sellers able to freely
determine prices. However, the Energy Authority has retained the
right to control prices for certain customers, mainly
residential, and must decide by July 31, 2005, whether to
allow distributors to freely set the prices charged to these
customers. It is also still in the process of establishing
regulations to govern certain activities on the free market
(such as sales regulations, network codes and provider-switching
procedures). We cannot predict whether or when these regulations
will result in a fully liberalized market, or how the natural
gas market will develop under these conditions.
Our strategy is to seek both to be the cost leader in the
generation of electricity and the distribution and sale of
electricity and gas in Italy and to provide high quality
customer service. If we are unable to implement this strategy,
or are otherwise unable to adapt our core energy businesses to
meet these regulatory challenges, it may have a material adverse
effect on our business prospects, financial condition and
results of operations.
For a more complete description of the regulation of the Italian
energy industry and the way we expect regulatory matters to
affect the electricity and gas markets, you should read
“Item 4. Information on the Company —
Regulatory Matters.”
6
Our facilities are subject to operating risks outside of
our control; certain of our activities depend on third-party
patents and licenses
Our generation plants, as well as our distribution networks, are
constantly exposed to risks related to their malfunction and
other interruptions in service resulting from events outside of
our control. These events may result in increased costs and
other losses. Although we have acquired insurance coverage for
events of this nature in line with general market practice, our
coverage may prove insufficient to fully compensate us for any
increased costs or losses that may occur as a result of service
interruptions or malfunctions, with a consequent adverse effect
on our business prospects, financial condition and results of
operations. You should also read “— Further power
outages involving our electricity operations could adversely
affect our financial condition and results of operations,”
below.
In addition, our “Telemanagement” digital electricity
meter project is dependent on certain communications components
and technology that are based on patents and licenses held by
third parties and may require certain additional related
services by third parties, such as maintenance. Please see
“Item 4. Information on the Company —
Business — The Enel Group — Sales,
Infrastructure and Networks — Telemanagement
System” for a description of this project. Interruptions in
the availability of these components and technology or of the
necessary related services provided by such third parties may be
outside our control, and could have a material adverse effect on
our financial condition and results of operations.
We may not be able to complete our power plant conversion
and other capital investment programs on schedule or realize the
expected benefits of these programs
In line with our strategy to reduce generation operating costs,
we are implementing a program to convert several of our thermal
generation plants to adopt more efficient technology or use
cheaper fuels, such as coal. We cannot predict whether we will
be able to complete our conversion program in accordance with
the schedule we have set or in the manner currently
contemplated, nor whether we will be able to realize the
anticipated benefits of this program. Any such failure could
have a material adverse effect on our business prospects,
financial condition and results of operations.
In addition, there is public opposition to our construction
plans and conversion of power plants in certain municipalities,
and we cannot exclude the possibility that in the future, such
opposition may have a material adverse effect on our development
plans, and, as a result, on our business.
Significant increases in fuel prices or disruptions in our
fuel supplies could have a negative effect on our
business
Our thermal generation plants use fuel oil, natural gas and coal
to generate electricity. Increases in energy prices therefore
have a direct effect on our operating costs. Both the cost and
availability of fuel are subject to many economic and political
factors and events occurring throughout the world, particularly
those that affect fuel-producing regions. Although we attempt to
manage our risk through the use of financial instruments hedging
our exposure to fluctuations in the price of fuel, we can
neither control nor accurately predict these factors and events.
Our use of natural gas has increased in recent years, and, given
our conversion of significant generation capacity to
combined-cycle technology, we expect it to constitute a
significant portion of our fuel consumption in the future. In
2004, approximately 44% of the electricity we produced was
generated by plants using natural gas. We currently obtain a
significant portion of the natural gas we use directly from
Algeria and Nigeria. Any major disruptions of this imported
supply could adversely affect our continued ability to procure
sufficient quantities of natural gas.
If in the future there are significant or unexpected changes in
the price of the fuels we use to generate electricity or if
adequate supplies of fuel become unavailable, our financial
condition and results of operations could be materially
adversely affected.
7
Our expansion outside of Italy subjects us to risks
associated with local market conditions, as well as to risks
associated with operating the businesses we acquire
In recent years, we have expanded our operations outside Italy.
Our operations abroad now include, among others, generation
plants in Spain, Bulgaria and North, Central and South America,
distribution networks in Spain and distribution and sales
operations in Romania. In 2004, we also established a joint
venture to manage a generation plant in Russia, and in 2005 we
agreed to purchase 66% of the largest generation company in
Slovakia and we entered into a non-binding memorandum of
understanding with French state-owned electricity company
Electricité de France S.A. (“EDF”) regarding an
industrial partnership that, among other things, provides for
our acquisition of a 12.5% stake in EDF’s EPR nuclear
power plant project. Please see “Item 4. Information
on the Company — Business — The Enel
Group — Generation and Energy Management —
International Generation.” We will continue to evaluate
opportunities outside Italy in the generation, distribution and
sale of electricity businesses in both the countries where we
currently operate and new markets.
This international expansion requires us to become familiar with
new markets and competitors in order to manage and operate these
businesses effectively, and exposes us to local economic,
regulatory and political risks. The process of integrating
acquired operations, personnel and information systems can also
be difficult and could absorb management time and resources and
distract management from other opportunities or problems in our
business and industry. In addition, some of the companies we
have acquired may require significant capital investments.
Operating internationally may also subject us to risks related
to currency exchange rate fluctuations, foreign investment
restrictions or restrictions on remittances by local
subsidiaries. Depending on the circumstances, unfavorable
developments in or affecting our operations outside Italy could
adversely affect our business prospects, financial condition and
results of operations.
In addition, the company we have agreed to acquire in Slovakia,
Slovenskè Elektrárne a.s. (“SE”), currently
has six nuclear power generating units with an aggregate net
installed capacity of 2,640 MW and two nuclear units under
construction. Under the terms of the acquisition agreement, SE
will transfer its oldest nuclear power units to a company owned
by the Slovakian government prior to closing of the transaction.
Enel is also currently preparing a 2006-2010 investment plan for
SE, to be approved by the Slovakian government, that includes
new investments in nuclear capacity. Although we believe that
all of SE’s existing nuclear plants use internationally
accepted technologies and are managed in accordance with Western
European standards, our acquisition of the majority
participation in SE’s share capital will expose us to the
risks of ownership and operation of nuclear generating
facilities, including the handling, disposal and storage of
radioactive materials and spent fuel, as well as of the
potential harmful effects on the environment and human health.
In addition, while the Republic of Slovakia and SE have ratified
the Vienna Convention, potential limits may arise on the amount
and types of insurance commercially available to cover the risks
associated with these operations. Potential risks may also arise
in connection with the decommissioning of these nuclear plants,
particularly as the regulatory regime for nuclear power and
nuclear decommissioning in Slovakia is currently in the process
of being defined. We have not owned any nuclear power plants
since November 2000, and we have not produced electricity from
nuclear power plants since 1988.
Further power outages involving our electricity operations
could adversely affect our financial condition and results of
operations
On September 28, 2003, Italy suffered a complete blackout
of electrical service that affected the entire country with the
exception of the island of Sardinia. After the blackout,
approximately 21 hours were necessary before electricity
again became available to all customers.
The Energy Authority in September 2004 initiated a formal
proceeding to determine whether companies including our
subsidiaries Enel Produzione S.p.A. (“Enel
Produzione”), Enel Distribuzione S.p.A. (“Enel
Distribuzione”), Terna and Deval S.p.A. (“Deval”)
may have been partially responsible for the blackout. At the
close of its inquiry (currently expected by July 31, 2005,
for the portion relating to generating companies, and by
November 30, 2005, for that relating to transmission and
distribution companies), the Energy Authority could impose
sanctions on, or request undertakings from, operators it holds
at fault in the incident.
8
Furthermore, certain of our customers brought legal actions
against us in the Italian courts seeking damages as a result of
this blackout. Although the claims made by these plaintiffs are
for minor amounts, an increase in the number of decisions
finding us liable for such damages could result in an increase
in the number of such claims filed and the magnitude of the
damages sought. For more information on the civil and
administrative proceedings related to the blackout, please read
“Item 8. Financial Information — Other
Financial Information — Legal Proceedings —
Blackout litigation.”
While we do not believe we were responsible for the blackout, we
cannot exclude the possibility that we will be held liable for
it by the Italian courts and/or by the Energy Authority. Any
finding of liability on our part could result in the imposition
of fines and other administrative sanctions and in additional
lawsuits by other parties against us, which could have a
material adverse effect on our financial condition and results
of operations.
Although the blackout has not had a material impact on our
operations or financial results, we cannot provide any assurance
that further power outages or disruptions involving our
operations will not occur in the future, or that any such
outages or disruptions would not have a material adverse effect
on our financial condition and results of operations. The Energy
Authority recently issued proposals for public comment for the
institution of a system of automatic compensation payable by
electricity distributors to affected customers in the event of a
blackout of other widespread and prolonged service interruption.
Please see “Item 4. Information on the
Company — Regulatory Matters — Electricity
Regulation — Quality of service regulation.”
We have been and are subject to abuse of dominant
position, market abuse and other regulatory
investigations
We have been and are likely to continue to be subject to
regulatory and antitrust investigations in the Italian
electricity market. We are currently a subject of an Antitrust
Authority investigation with respect to certain sharp increases
in the price of electricity on the Italian power exchange in
June 2004 and in January 2005. The Antitrust Authority opened
this investigation, due to be completed by March 31, 2006,
after the Energy Authority on April 12, 2005, officially
concluded that these increases may have been associated with
violations of antitrust law by us. For more information, please
see “Item 8. Financial Information — Other
Financial Information — Legal Proceedings.” If
the Antitrust Authority were to hold us liable for the abusive
practices alleged, it could impose a fine on us of up to 10% of
our total revenues in the preceding fiscal year.
In addition, in February 2005, the European Commission announced
plans to launch an investigation into the functioning of the
European electricity market. We cannot predict when this
investigation will take place, or what the results of any
subsequent related actions taken by the European Commission may
be.
While we do not believe we have committed any violation of
antitrust laws, we cannot exclude the possibility that we will
be held liable in the current investigations by the Antitrust
Authority, nor that there will be other such investigations by
the Energy Authority, the Antitrust Authority or other
regulatory bodies in Italy or abroad in the future. Should we be
held liable in the current or any future investigations, and
should such liability result in the imposition of significant
fines or of material restrictions on our activity, there could
be a material adverse effect on our financial condition and
results of operations.
The effect of the anticipated market for
CO2emissions trading on our business
is uncertain
In accordance with EU directives to implement the Kyoto Protocol
that established a market mechanism for the trading of
CO2 emission trading rights starting from
January 1, 2005, the Environment Ministry and the Ministry
of Productive Activities submitted a national allocation plan on
the allowable levels of CO2 emissions for Italy
for the 2005 to 2007 period to the European Commission for
approval in 2004. In an amendment to the national allocation
plan published in February 2005, the Enel Group had been
assigned emissions quotas of 54 million, 45 million
and 45 million metric tons of CO2 for the years
2005, 2006 and 2007, respectively. Please see “Item 4.
Information on the Company — Regulatory
Matters — Environmental Matters —
CO2 Emissions.” On May 25, 2005, the
European Commission approved Italy’s national allocation
plan including, however, modifications that reduce the allowable
emissions assigned to Italy by 9% (from a total of
255 million metric tons to 232 million per year) and
therefore require a revision to the February 2005
9
emissions quota allocations. The Environment Ministry and the
Ministry of Productive Activities are currently working to
allocate the overall allowable emissions levels among the
various operators in the industries that are subject to the
regulations, including us. In 2006, these ministries will
establish the allowable levels for the 2008 to 2012 period.
We are not currently able to predict what emissions levels will
be allocated to the Enel Group for the 2005-2007 period or for
any subsequent period, nor whether such allocation will be
sufficient to meet our production needs. We therefore cannot be
certain that our current plans for our generation plants will be
adequate to permit us to comply with the required levels once
they are defined.
Should the final allocation be insufficient, we could be
required to purchase emission trading rights on the market,
which could result in an increase in our electricity generation
costs. At May 31, 2005, the weighted average price over the
prior six months for one emission trading right for the years
2005, 2006 and 2007 was approximately
€13. Any
significant increase in the cost of our generation operations as
a result of these new emissions limits could have a material
adverse effect on our results of operations and our financial
condition.
A European Commission challenge to Italian regulations on
hydroelectric concessions could adversely affect our business,
financial condition and result of operations
We operate our hydroelectric plants pursuant to concessions
granted and regulated by national and local authorities.
In January 2004, the European Commission determined that certain
Italian regulations regarding hydroelectric concessions were
contrary to EU law. In particular, the European Commission
objected to renewal preferences granted to existing holders of
concessions (and in the region of Trentino-Alto Adige, to the
operator controlled by the local authorities) upon the expiry of
those concessions, as well as to the fact that the regulations
provided for the expiration of all concessions in 2029 (and for
the region of Trentino-Alto Adige, in 2010), even though these
concessions had previously been of perpetual duration.
Our hydroelectric plants accounted for approximately 34% of our
net installed capacity in 2004 (with 4.7% of our net installed
capacity attributable to those in the region of Trentino-Alto
Adige and 29.3% to those in the rest of Italy). If the European
Commission brings a formal action before the Court of Justice to
enforce its request and the Court of Justice affirms the
European Commission’s opinion, our hydroelectric
concessions may be terminated prematurely and we may not be able
to renew these concessions at all or on favorable terms. This
could have a material adverse effect on our business prospects,
financial condition and results of operations.
We are dependent on government concessions for our
electricity and gas distribution businesses
The Marzano Law changed the expiration date for certain gas
distribution concessions. Prior to enactment of the Marzano Law,
gas distribution concessions awarded prior to May 2000 by means
other than competitive tender expired by law at the earlier of
their original expiration date or December 31, 2005, with
the expiration date extendible for up to five years under
certain conditions. The Marzano Law, as interpreted by the
Ministry of Productive Activities in November 2004, provided
instead that these concessions are to expire at the earlier of
their original expiration date or December 31, 2007, with
the expiration date still extendible for up to five years under
certain conditions. Under the same law, local authorities have
the power to extend the expiration date from December 31,2007 to December 31, 2008. However, two municipalities in
Lombardy have not accepted this revision of the expiration date,
and have passed measures that would terminate gas distribution
concessions in their jurisdictions on December 31, 2005.
While we have challenged these measures before the
Administrative Tribunal of Lombardy, that court in February 2005
upheld them, ruling that new local legislation must be enacted
for the relevant provisions of the Marzano Law to take effect.
We have appealed this ruling to the Council of State, the
highest competent appeals court, and a hearing on the matter has
been set for June 24, 2005. While we do not believe the
Administrative Tribunal of Lombardy’s ruling is consistent
with the provisions of the Marzano Law, should its position be
upheld on appeal and should other municipalities pass similar
measures, it could have a material adverse effect on our
business prospects, financial condition and results of
operations. Please see “Item 8. Financial
Information — Other Financial Information —
Legal Proceedings — Gas concessions” for more
details on this proceedings.
10
Separately, in November 2004, the Italian region of Tuscany
challenged before the Constitutional Court certain provisions of
the Marzano Law regarding the allocation of powers between the
Italian state and regions in connection with the regulation of
electricity and gas distribution, including concessions. The
region’s position is that, following amendments made to the
Italian constitution in 2001, regulation of “local
distribution” is the jurisdiction of regional governments,
although the region has not to date specified what the scope of
such jurisdiction would be, nor what “local
distribution” precisely means. A hearing on the matter was
held on May 24, 2005, and we expect the Constitutional
Court to issue its ruling in the second half of 2005. We cannot
predict what effect a ruling by the Constitutional Court in the
region’s favor would have on the regulation of electricity
and gas distribution activities and concessions in Italy,
including the possibility that we might in the future be
required to comply with new and varying rules in some or all of
Italy’s different regions.
Any adverse change in the regulatory framework governing our
distribution activities and concessions could have a material
adverse effect on our business prospects, financial condition
and results of operations.
Our businesses are subject to numerous environmental
regulations that could significantly affect our financial
condition and results of operations
Our businesses are subject to extensive environmental regulation
under Italian law, including laws adopted to implement European
Union regulations and directives and international agreements on
the environment. Environmental regulations affecting our
business primarily relate to air emissions, water pollution,
waste disposal and electromagnetic fields. The principal air
emissions deriving from thermal electricity generation are
sulfur dioxide (SO2), nitrogen oxides
(NOx), carbon dioxide (CO2) and
particulate matter such as dust and ash.
We incur significant costs to comply with environmental
regulations requiring us to implement preventive or remedial
measures, although in some cases we may recover some or all of
these costs through the tariff structure or other reimbursement
mechanisms provided by law. Environmental regulations may also
influence our business decisions and strategy, such as by
discouraging the use of certain fuels. In addition, expressions
of public concern about environmental problems associated with
electricity generating plants, transmission and
telecommunications infrastructure and other facilities may
result in even more stringent regulation in the future, which
could further increase costs.
In 2004, we spent a total of
€607 million
(including environmental taxes) on measures intended to reduce
the impact of our operations on the environment, including
measures to comply with applicable law. Of this aggregate of
€607 million
in environmental expenditures,
€495 million
was accounted for as current expenditures and
€112 million
as capital expenditures. Major capital expenditures included
projects to reduce SO2 and NOx emissions
by our power plants and to install underground cables in our
distribution network. In 2004, we also incurred approximately
€285 million
in additional fuel costs attributable to compliance with
environmental regulations.
In addition, we are parties to a significant number of legal
proceedings relating to environmental matters. The aggregate
amount of damages that we may be required to pay and the
aggregate costs of remediation or preventive measures we may be
required to implement in connection with these proceedings may
be significant.
The adoption of any additional or more rigorous environmental
rules applicable to our businesses would be likely to increase
our costs and could have a negative effect on our financial
condition and results of operations. Please see
“Item 4. Information on the Company —
Regulatory Matters — Environmental Matters” and
“Item 8. Financial Information — Other
Financial Information — Legal Proceedings” for a
more detailed discussion of environmental matters. Please see
also “— We may incur significant capital
expenditures to comply with legislation on electromagnetic
fields; we may not be fully reimbursed for these capital
expenditures,” below.
11
Other Risks Relating to Our Businesses
We may be unable to exit the telecommunications business
on acceptable terms or in accordance with the currently
envisaged timetable
On May 26, 2005, we entered into an agreement for the sale
to Weather Investments II S.a.r.l. (“Weather
Investments”) of a 62.75% interest in Wind. We expect to
complete the sale of this majority interest during the summer of
2005; the agreement also contemplates our disposal of our
remaining interest in Wind to Weather Investments S.r.l.
(“Weather”) in the first half of 2006. The agreement
is subject to the approval of both the Antitrust Authority and
the Communications Authority. Upon completion of these
transactions, we will no longer have any direct interest in
Wind, but will hold an interest of 26.1% in Weather, which will
then indirectly own all of Wind, as well as a controlling stake
in Orascom Telecom Holding SAE (“Orascom”), an
Egypt-based mobile phone company with principal operations in
the Middle East, Africa and Pakistan. For additional details
regarding the agreement, see “Item 4. Information on
the Company — Business —
Overview — Telecommunications.”
We have entered into this agreement as part of our announced
strategy to focus on our core energy business and ultimately to
exit the telecommunications business. In this context, the
shareholders’ agreement we expect to enter into with
Weather Investments in connection with this transaction
contemplates an initial public offering of Weather as soon as
possible, market conditions permitting. However, we and Weather
Investments will each agree, subject to certain exceptions, not
to sell our interests in Weather until this initial public
offering. We can give no assurance that we will be able to
complete any such offering or otherwise dispose of all or any
part of our interest in Weather on favorable terms or in
accordance with our envisaged timetable, if at all.
We may be unable to dispose of the majority of our
remaining interest in Terna on the anticipated timetable or
terms
Management of the national electricity transmission grid is
currently entrusted to the Gestore della Rete, which is wholly
owned by the MEF. Under a decree issued in May 2004, the Gestore
della Rete is required to transfer, by October 31, 2005,
the management activities of the national transmission grid to
Terna, our consolidated subsidiary. Upon this transfer, no
electricity operator, including Enel, will be entitled to
exercise voting rights in excess of 5% with respect to the
appointment of Terna’s directors. In addition, the May 2004
decree requires Enel to reduce its holding in Terna to no more
than 20% by July 1, 2007. Terna and the Gestore della Rete
in February 2005 agreed upon terms for the transfer to Terna of
the management activities of the transmission grid, subject to
the approval of the Antitrust Authority. Enel currently owns
36.14% of Terna’s shares and, in May 2005, Enel agreed to
sell to Cassa Depositi e Prestiti a 29.99% stake in Terna for
consideration that, depending on the price of Terna’s
shares on the Telematico during the 30 trading days prior to
closing of the sale, will be between a minimum of
€1,228 million
and a maximum of
€1,412 million.
Closing of the transaction is subject to certain conditions,
including, among other things, Antitrust Authority approval of
both this sale and the transfer of management activities of the
transmission grid from the Gestore della Rete to Terna. Please
see “Item 4. Information on the Company —
Business — Overview — Transmission.”
Should this transfer fail to take place or should Enel otherwise
be unable to consummate the sale to Cassa Depositi e Prestiti,
there can be no assurance that Enel will be able to sell the
majority of its remaining interest in Terna in accordance with
its envisaged timetable or on its expected terms, if at all.
Enel’s inability to dispose of this business on acceptable
terms could have a material adverse effect on our business.
Our historical consolidated financial and operating
results may not be indicative of future performance
We are in the process of divesting most of Enel’s current
36.14% stake in Terna, which, together with its subsidiaries,
constitutes our Transmission Division, having agreed in May 2005
to sell a 29.99% stake in Terna to Cassa Depositi e Prestiti. We
also in May 2005 entered into an agreement for the sale in a
series of transactions of Wind, which, together with its
subsidiaries, constitutes our Telecommunications Division. As a
result of these transactions, we expect to deconsolidate both
Terna and Wind during 2005. Our Transmission Division provided
€1,023 million
(or 2.8%) of our operating revenues and
€509 million
(or 8.0%) of our operating income in 2004, while our
Telecommunications Division provided
€4,714 million
(or 12.9%) of our operating revenues and registered an operating
loss of
€456 million
in 2004. We also entered into agreements
12
to make significant acquisitions over the past year, most
notably for SE. Please see “Item 4. Information on the
Company — Business” for additional information on
these transactions. See also “Item 5. Operating and
Financial Review and Prospects — Analysis of Operating
Results” for a discussion of Terna’s and Wind’s
financial results. We may continue to divest assets as a part of
our ongoing efforts to refocus our activities on our core
electricity and gas businesses, and to acquire new businesses as
part of our international expansion. As a result, our historical
consolidated financial and operational performance during or as
of the end of periods ending on or prior to the consummation of
these transactions may not be indicative of our future operating
and financial performance.
We may incur significant capital expenditures to comply
with legislation on electromagnetic fields; we may not be fully
reimbursed for these capital expenditures
In 2001, the Italian Parliament passed a law intended to protect
the general public and workers against alleged potential
long-term health effects of exposure to electromagnetic fields
generated by both low frequency infrastructure, including
electricity transmission and distribution lines and substations,
and high-frequency infrastructure, including the transmission
stations that Wind uses to provide mobile telephone services.
The law provides for the adoption and implementation of programs
to bring existing electricity transmission and distribution
lines, substations and high frequency infrastructure into
compliance with electromagnetic exposure requirements to be set
by the Italian government. On July 8, 2003, the Italian
government issued a decree establishing certain limits on the
allowable amounts of electromagnetic exposure. We are still in
the process of determining the estimated costs of complying with
these limits by upgrading, moving or otherwise modifying our
mobile telephony infrastructure, electricity lines and
transmission and distribution facilities. Although, with respect
to electricity transmission and distribution lines and
substations, this law requires the Energy Authority to set
criteria, terms and conditions for the recovery of the costs
that the owners would bear in complying with these requirements,
any actual reimbursements received may be lower than our actual
costs. Our financial condition and results of operations may be
adversely affected as a consequence. Moreover, we cannot assure
you that the Italian government will not set even stricter
limits in the future. Please see “Item 4. Information
on the Company — Regulatory Matters —
Environmental Matters — Electromagnetic Fields”
for a more detailed description of these matters.
The Italian social security fund is seeking to impose
significant liabilities on us
On May 6, 2005, INPS, the Italian social security fund,
issued a circular purporting to extend to formerly state-owned
companies and national public entities carrying out industrial
activities an obligation for employers to make certain social
security contributions. As state-owned entities, these companies
had been exempted from this obligation. In the circular, INPS
indicated that this obligation would be applied with retroactive
effect as of the date of privatization of the relevant entity.
Although the INPS circular specifically mentions Enel Group
companies as being among the entities that would be required to
make such additional contributions, we do not believe that this
circular should be applicable to us, nor that it may be applied
retroactively under Italian law, and we intend to challenge the
circular before the competent court. However, we are not able to
predict the ultimate outcome of the challenge, and in the case
of an unfavorable outcome, we cannot exclude the possibility
that we may be required to pay such contributions. While we are
still evaluating the potential impact on us of this circular, on
a preliminary basis we estimate that the amounts we could be
required to pay if the circular is applied to us in the form
that it was issued by INPS could total approximately
€500 million
for any retroactive obligations and approximately
€80 million
per year going forward.
Recently enacted legislation could increase our local
property tax burden
On May 31, 2005, the Italian Parliament passed a new law to
aid local governments that included, among other things,
provisions regarding the determination of the deemed value of
electricity generation facilities for purposes of assessing,
among others, local property taxes. Under the new law, owners of
electric utilities are required to include in the computation of
the taxable value of their facilities not only land and
buildings, but also the value of removable parts of the
facilities, such as generation equipment. During the approval
process, which was expedited to permit the conversion of a
government decree into law before the Parliament’s mandate
to do so expired, the Senate committed the government, and the
government agreed, to take
13
legislative action to rescind these particular provisions or at
least to specify that they may not be applied retroactively, and
otherwise limit their scope in order to reduce the potential tax
burden for companies operating in the electricity sector.
We are already involved in proceedings disputing property taxes
levied on some of our generating facilities by certain local
authorities, in connection with which we believe we have
established adequate provisions in our consolidated balance
sheet. At December 31, 2004, these provisions amounted to
approximately
€40 million.
In any event, we intend to continue to challenge before the
competent authorities any attempt by local authorities to impose
additional local property taxes on us.
Were the new rules, which took effect on June 1, to be
applied without modification, we expect that our local property
taxes (the imposta comunale sugli immobili, or ICI) would
increase by approximately
€80 million
per year (excluding any amounts that would be due in respect of
past years should the government or the Italian Parliament fail
to take the necessary legislative actions, and/or should we not
prevail in any legal challenge we bring).
We are defendants in a number of legal proceedings
We are defendants in a number of legal proceedings incidental to
the generation, transmission and distribution of electricity and
our other business activities. Our pending legal proceedings
include various civil and administrative claims and disputes
relating to the construction and operation of several power
stations, transmission and distribution lines, and other matters
that arise in the normal course of our business. We have
established a reserve for litigation and other contingent
liabilities where we consider it probable that a claim will be
resolved unfavorably and where we can reasonably estimate the
potential loss involved. This reserve, which also includes
provisions for other contingencies and uncertainties related to
our operations, is included in other non-current liabilities in
our consolidated balance sheet, and amounted to
€1,283 million
at December 31, 2004, of which
€382 million
related to legal proceedings. Please see “Item 8.
Financial Information — Other Financial
Information — Legal Proceedings.”
However, we are not able to predict the ultimate outcome of any
of the claims against us, and any material damages or other
costs imposed on us in the event of an unfavorable outcome may
be in excess of our existing reserves. We cannot exclude that
unfavorable decisions in proceedings against us could have a
material adverse effect on our financial position or results of
operations.
Risks Relating to Enel’s Ordinary Shares and ADSs
The MEF, Enel’s controlling shareholder, has
significant influence over Enel’s actions
The MEF currently directly owns approximately 31.3% of
Enel’s outstanding share capital and therefore controls
Enel. Cassa Depositi e Prestiti, which is controlled by the MEF,
holds an additional approximately 10.2% of Enel’s share
capital. As long as the MEF retains control of Enel for purposes
of applicable Italian law on controlled companies (which is
determined based on having a majority of the vote at ordinary
shareholders’ meetings or otherwise exercising a dominant
influence over another company), the MEF will be able to
exercise significant control over all matters to be voted on by
Enel’s shareholders, including, without limitation, the
election and removal of directors and possible capital increases
or amendments to Enel’s by-laws. While the MEF has
announced that it plans to sell a further interest of
approximately 10% of Enel’s share capital by September
2005, market conditions permitting, the amount of shares the MEF
will subsequently directly and indirectly own following such a
transaction would still permit it to control Enel for purposes
of Italian law. As a result, other shareholders’ ability to
influence decisions on matters submitted to a vote of
Enel’s shareholders may be limited.
The special powers of the Italian government may permit it
to influence Enel’s business, regardless of the level of
its shareholding
The Italian privatization law (as amended by the 2004 Budget
Law) and Enel’s by-laws confer upon the Italian government,
acting through the MEF (which acts after consultations with and
in agreement with the Ministry of Productive Activities),
certain special powers with respect to Enel’s business and
actions by its
14
shareholders. These powers, which the MEF confirmed with a
decree issued on September 17, 2004, may permit the
government to influence Enel’s business, regardless of the
level of its shareholding.
The MEF also has the following specific powers:
•
the power to oppose the acquisition by persons or entities of an
interest in the Company equal to or in excess of 3% of the
shares with voting rights at the ordinary shareholders’
meetings;
•
the power to oppose certain types of shareholders’
agreements entered into by holders of at least one-twentieth of
the voting capital stock at ordinary shareholders’ meetings;
•
the power to veto any resolution to dissolve, merge or demerge
Enel, transfer a significant part of Enel’s business or
Enel’s registered headquarters outside of Italy, change
Enel’s corporate purpose or eliminate or modify any of the
MEF’s special powers; and
•
the MEF may directly appoint one non-voting member of
Enel’s board of directors, in addition to the voting
members elected by Enel’s shareholders.
The MEF may exercise these powers only for due cause when it
believes that a concrete detriment to vital national interests
would otherwise result.
The special powers retained by the MEF are described in further
detail under “Item 7. Major Shareholders and Related
Party Transactions — Major Shareholders” and
“Item 10. Additional Information —
By-Laws.” As a result of these powers, Enel may not enter
into change of control transactions without the approval of the
MEF, in agreement with the Ministry of Productive Activities.
This may limit the ability of Enel’s shareholders to
benefit from a premium in connection with a change of control
transaction.
The value of ordinary shares or ADSs may be adversely
affected by sales of substantial amounts of shares by the MEF or
other shareholders or the perception that such sales could
occur
The MEF and/or Cassa Depositi e Prestiti may sell Enel’s
ordinary shares at any time. In October 2004, the MEF sold an
additional interest of approximately 19% in a public offering in
Italy and a private placement to international institutional
investors that was not registered under the Securities Act, and
has announced plans to sell a further interest of approximately
10% in the Company in a similar offering by September 2005,
market conditions permitting. There are no minimum ownership or
similar requirements under Italian law that would limit sales of
additional shares by the MEF or Cassa Depositi e Prestiti.
Sales of substantial amounts of ordinary shares by the MEF or
other shareholders, or the perception that such sales could
occur, could adversely affect the market price of Enel’s
ordinary shares and American Depositary Shares, or ADSs, and
could limit Enel’s ability to raise capital through equity
offerings.
The value, expressed in dollars, of the ordinary shares
and ADSs and of any dividends Enel pays in respect of its
ordinary shares and ADSs will be affected by the euro/dollar
exchange rate
Enel pays cash dividends in euros; as a result, exchange rate
movements may affect the amounts, expressed in
U.S. dollars, that investors receive from Citibank, N.A.,
the depositary for Enel’s ADS program (“Citibank”
or the “Depositary”), in respect of such dividends if
they hold ADSs. Moreover, the price of Enel’s ordinary
shares is quoted in euros. Therefore, exchange rate movements
may also affect the U.S. dollar price of the ADSs
corresponding to Enel’s ordinary share price.
It is possible that the price of ordinary shares and ADSs
will experience significant volatility
The market price of Enel’s ordinary shares and ADSs may be
significantly affected by factors such as variations in our
results of operations, market conditions specific to our
industry and changes in regulations applicable to us. In
addition, stock markets can experience significant fluctuations
that may be unrelated to the performance or circumstances of the
specific companies whose shares are affected. Market
fluctuations, as well as economic conditions, may adversely
affect the market price of the ordinary shares and ADSs.
15
If you hold ADSs rather than ordinary shares it may be
difficult for you to exercise some of your rights as a
shareholder
It may be more difficult for you to exercise your rights as a
shareholder if you hold ADSs than it would be if you directly
held ordinary shares. For example, if Enel offers new shares and
you have the right to subscribe for a portion of them, the
Depositary is allowed, in its own discretion, to sell for your
benefit that right to subscribe for new shares instead of making
it available to you. Also, in some cases, you may not be able to
vote by giving instructions to the Depositary on how to vote for
you.
Forward-Looking Statements
This annual report includes forward-looking statements. When
used in this annual report, the words “seek(s),”“intend(s),”“aim(s),”“expect(s),”“will,”“may,”“believe(s),”“should,”“anticipate(s)” and similar expressions are intended
to identify forward-looking statements. We have based these
forward-looking statements on our current expectations and
projections about future events. These forward-looking
statements regard, among other things:
•
Anticipated trends in our businesses, including trends in demand
for electricity;
•
Changes in the regulatory environment and expectations on how
and when new regulations will be implemented;
•
The remuneration of our generation activities based on
competitive electricity prices rather than tariffs following the
introduction of trading on the Italian power exchange;
•
The impact of changes in electricity and gas tariffs;
•
Our ability to implement successfully our cost reduction program;
•
The possibility that significant volumes of lower-cost
electricity will become available as a result of increased
imports and the construction of new plants in Italy;
•
Enel’s intention to reduce its stake in Terna from 36.14%
to approximately 5%, following its agreement in May 2005 to sell
to Cassa Depositi e Prestiti a 29.99% stake in Terna;
•
Our intention to divest Wind, having entered into an agreement
in May 2005 for the sale of Wind in a series of transactions
that we expect ultimately to lead our exit from the
telecommunications business, as well as our intention to divest
certain other non-core businesses;
•
Our intentions with respect to future dividend payments;
•
Our intention to expand our core businesses, including by
increasing our presence in renewable energy and developing our
gas distribution and sales business;
•
Our intention to expand our operations outside Italy; and
•
Future capital expenditures and investments.
The forward-looking statements included in this annual report
are subject to risks, uncertainties and assumptions about the
Group. Our actual results of operations may differ materially
from the forward-looking statements as a result of, among other
things, the risk factors described under “Risk
Factors.” We undertake no obligation to publicly update or
revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of
new information, future events or otherwise occurring after the
date of this annual report. In light of these risks,
uncertainties and assumptions, the forward-looking events
discussed in this annual report might not occur.
We were established in December 1962 as a state-owned entity
(Ente Nazionale per l’Energia Elettrica) through the
nationalization of approximately 1,250 private power companies
in Italy. In 1992, we ceased to operate as a public entity and
were transformed into a company limited by shares, Enel S.p.A.
16
Until April 1, 1999, Italy’s electricity market was
highly regulated. On that date, a new law, the Bersani Decree,
came into force, beginning the transformation of the Italian
electricity market into a liberalized market, in which energy
prices charged by generators are freely determined. Beginning in
October 1999, as required by the Bersani Decree, we formed
separate subsidiary companies, to each of which we assigned the
responsibility (and related assets, liabilities and personnel)
for each of our significant businesses. As a part of this
liberalization, we were also required to transfer responsibility
for the management and control of the Italian national
electricity transmission grid and responsibility for electricity
dispatching to the Gestore della Rete, a company wholly owned by
the MEF.
In November 1999, the MEF sold approximately 32% of Enel’s
share capital in Enel’s initial public offering, in
connection with which Enel’s ADSs were listed on the New
York Stock Exchange and Enel’s shares were listed on the
Telematico, the Italian screen-based trading market managed by
Borsa Italiana. Following this sale, as part of the
privatization and liberalization of the Italian electricity
market, the MEF subsequently sold stakes in Enel of 6.6% in the
context of a private placement transaction in November 2003 and
approximately 10% to Cassa Depositi e Prestiti, a company now
owned 70% by the MEF, in December 2003. In October 2004, the MEF
sold an additional interest in Enel of approximately 19% in a
public offering in Italy and a private placement to
international institutional investors not registered under the
Securities Act, and has announced plans to sell a further
interest of approximately 10% in the Company in a similar
offering by September 2005, market conditions permitting.
Since 1999, we have expanded our operations in the gas sector
through the acquisition of several independent gas distributors.
Since 2000, we have also expanded our energy operations abroad,
including through the purchase in 2002 of Electra de Viesgo S.L.
(“Viesgo”), a company with electricity generation and
distribution operations in Spain, and, in March 2003, of a
controlling interest in Maritza East III Power Company AD
(“Maritza East III”), a company with electricity
generation operations in Bulgaria. We have also acquired power
producers specializing in renewable resources, including an 80%
interest in Uniòn Fenosa Energìas Especiales S.A. (now
Enel Uniòn Fenosa Renovables S.A., or “EUFR”) in
Spain, as well as operations in North, Central and South
America. We acquired two electric distribution and sales
companies in Romania in April 2005, and we entered into an
agreement in February 2005 to purchase SE, the largest
electricity generator in Slovakia. We expect this transaction to
close by the end of 2005. As required by Italian legislation
adopted as part of the liberalization of the electricity market,
we have at the same time disposed of approximately
15,000 MW of our generating capacity through the sale of
Elettrogen in September 2001, Eurogen in May 2002, and
Interpower in January 2003, and have also been forced to sell
several municipal distribution networks.
Until June 2004, we owned 100% of Terna, the principal Italian
electricity transmission company, which currently owns more than
90% of the transmission assets of Italy’s national
electricity grid. Following the completion of an initial public
offering in Italy and a private placement with certain
institutional investors that was not registered under the
Securities Act of 50% of Terna’s share capital in June 2004
(the “Terna IPO”), and the sale of an additional 13.9%
of Terna’s share capital in April 2005, we currently own
approximately 36.14% of Terna’s share capital. In light of
Italian laws and regulations providing for the reunification of
the ownership and management of the Italian transmission grid
and imposing certain ownership restrictions on the entity that
will own and manage it, Enel in May 2005 took steps to further
reduce its stake in Terna, entering into an agreement to sell
29.99% of Terna’s share capital to Cassa Depositi e
Prestiti. We expect to close that sale, which is subject, among
other things, to antitrust approval, by the end of the third
quarter of 2005, reducing our stake in Terna to approximately
5%. Please see “— Business —
Overview — Transmission.”
We have also invested in telecommunications, starting in 1997,
when we, France Télécom and Deutsche Telekom together
formed our telecommunications subsidiary, Wind. Our initial
stake in Wind was 51%, which increased to 73.4% following
Deutsche Telekom’s exit from the joint venture in July 2000
and our contribution to Wind on July 30, 2001, of 100% of
the capital stock of Infostrada, an Italian fixed-line telephone
provider we purchased in 2001 from Vodafone Group plc.
Infostrada was merged into Wind as of January 1, 2002. In
July 2003, we acquired the 26.6% stake in Wind then held by
Wireless Services Belgium SA, a subsidiary of France
Télécom, becoming Wind’s sole shareholder.
17
In early 2005, we held discussions with two separate consortia
regarding a potential sale of all or part of Wind. After
considering binding offers proposed by each, in April 2005 we
entered into exclusive negotiations with Weather Investments, a
private consortium headed by Naguib Sawiris, who controls
Orascom, an Egypt-based mobile phone operator that provides
telecommunications services in the Middle East, Africa, and
Pakistan and is listed on the London Stock Exchange and the
Cairo and Alexandria Stock Exchange. In May 2005, we entered
into an agreement for the sale of Wind to Weather Investments in
a series of transactions that we expect to result in our owning
26.1% of Weather (which will then indirectly control both Wind
and Orascom) by mid-2006. In line with our strategy of focusing
on our core energy operations and ultimately exiting the
telecommunications business, the shareholders’ agreement we
expect to enter into with Weather Investments in connection with
this transaction contemplates an initial public offering of
Weather as soon as possible, market conditions permitting,
although both we and Weather Investments will each agree,
subject to certain exceptions not to sell our interests in
Weather until the initial public offering.
In 2004, our operations were organized into six business
divisions: Generation and Energy Management; Sales,
Infrastructure and Networks; Transmission; Telecommunications;
Services and Other Activities; and Corporate. In 2003, we also
had a seventh division, the International Division, which
included our international generation, sales and distribution
operations. In 2004, our management decided to re-allocate to
the relevant business divisions the operations that had been
grouped in the International Division in 2003. These operations
are now included, as appropriate, in the Generation and Energy
Management and Sales, Infrastructure and Networks divisions.
Each division has its own management structure, headed by a
senior manager who reports directly to the Chief Executive
Officer of Enel. Our Corporate Division includes Enel, which as
the parent company, defines the strategic objectives for the
Enel Group and coordinates the activities of the other
divisions. The parent company also manages finance operations
and insurance risk coverage for all Group companies, identifies
opportunities for international business development, and
provides assistance and guidelines on organizational, industrial
relations, accounting, administrative, tax and legal issues.
For additional information on each of our operating divisions
and their activities, please see
“— Business — The Enel Group,”
below. For a detailed discussion of our operational and
financial results in the period 2002-2004, please see
“Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and
Prospects.”
For a description of our capital expenditures in each of the
last three fiscal years, please see
“— Business — The Enel
Group — Capital Investment Program.”
Enel S.p.A. is a società per azioni, or a company
whose capital is represented by shares, incorporated under the
law of Italy. Enel’s statuto, or by-laws, provide
that the duration of the Company is until December 31,
2100. Enel’s registered office is at Viale Regina
Margherita 137, Rome, Italy. Enel’s main telephone number
is +39 06 83051. Individual investors may reach our retail
investor team at telephone number +39 06 8305 2081, while
institutional investors may reach our investor relations team at
telephone number +39 06 8305 7008. Enel is represented in the
United States by our subsidiary Enel North America Inc.
(“Enel North America”), located at Andover Business
Park, 200 Bulfinch Drive, Andover, MA01810.
Business
Overview
We are the principal electricity operator in Italy, with the
leading position in the generation, distribution and sale of
electricity. Based on revenues, we were one of the largest
industrial companies in Italy in 2004, with operating revenues
of
€36,489 million,
or $49,399 million. We earned net income in 2004 of
€2,706 million,
or $3,663 million. We believe that, in terms of the volume
of electricity sold in the year 2004, we were one of the largest
electric utilities in Europe, and according to Bloomberg, as of
May 31, 2005, we were also one of the largest publicly
traded electric utilities in the world based on market
capitalization.
18
The following table shows selected operating data for our
electricity and gas operations in Italy for each of the past
three years. Net production equals gross production of
electricity less consumption by units generating electricity and
mechanical and electrical losses in production.
2002
2003
2004
Net installed capacity (GW) in Italy at year end
43.8
(1)
41.8
42.0
Net electricity production in Italy (TWh)
145.1
(2)
137.8
125.9
Electricity sales to end users in Italy (TWh)(3)
181.3
152.2
157.8
Electricity sales on the regulated market in Italy (TWh)
150.9
141.5
137.0
Electricity sales on the free market in Italy (TWh)
30.4
10.7
20.8
Total electricity distributed in Italy (TWh)(4)
258.0
265.0
261.2
Natural gas sales to end users in Italy (billions of cubic
meters)
4.0
4.4
5.2
Natural gas sales customers in Italy at year end (millions)
1.7
1.8
2.0
(1)
Including 2.6 GW of capacity of Interpower, which was divested
in January 2003.
(2)
Including 8.0 TWh generated by Eurogen before it was divested in
May 2002, and 5.7 TWh generated by Interpower.
(3)
Excluding sales to resellers.
(4)
Including electricity distributed to resellers.
Generation and Energy Management. Our Generation and
Energy Management Division is responsible for our operations
related to the production of electricity and the procurement and
trading of fuel for electricity generation, and includes power
generation activities in Italy and abroad.
We are the largest producer of electricity in Italy. At
December 31, 2004, we had net installed capacity in Italy
of approximately 42.0 GW, which we estimate to have been
approximately 52% of total Italian net installed capacity at
that date. Our net electricity production in Italy in 2004 was
125.9 TWh, and, based on data provided by the Gestore della
Rete, we estimate that our production represented approximately
44% of Italian net production during 2004. Our net production
declined by 8.7%, or by 11.9 TWh, in 2004 as compared to 2003.
As of December 31, 2004, we had 595 generating plants in
Italy, consisting of thermal, hydroelectric, geothermal and
other renewable resources facilities, which, based on data
provided by the Gestore della Rete, we estimate represented
approximately 52% of the total net installed capacity in Italy
as of December 31, 2004. In 2004, 73.0% of our net
production was from thermal plants, 22.7% was from hydroelectric
plants and the remaining 4.3% was from geothermal and other
renewable resources plants. We do not own or operate any nuclear
plants in Italy.
At December 31, 2004, we also had electricity generation
plants outside Italy with aggregate net installed capacity of
approximately 3.9 GW, including facilities in Spain, Bulgaria
and North, Central and South America. In addition, we manage a
generation plant in Russia and in February 2005, we agreed to
acquire generation operations in Slovakia. We expect this
transaction to close by the end of 2005.
In 2004, the Generation and Energy Management Division had
revenues after intrasegment eliminations of
€12,982 million,
reflecting revenues prior to intrasegment eliminations of
€12,397 million
in Italy and
€623 million
abroad. This compares to revenues after intrasegment
eliminations of
€12,607 million
in 2003, reflecting revenues prior to intrasegment eliminations
of
€12,111 million
in Italy and
€518 million
abroad (which in 2003 were attributed to our former
International Division).
Sales, Infrastructure and Networks. Our Sales,
Infrastructure and Networks Division operates in both the
electricity and gas markets through two independent
sub-divisions — a sales sub-division and an
infrastructure and networks sub-division — responsible
respectively for sales of products and services and for
management of our distribution network.
We are the largest electricity distributor in Italy,
distributing a total of 261.2 TWh of electricity in 2004. At
December 31, 2004, our Italian distribution network
consisted of a total of 1,089,845 km of lines, mostly medium and
low voltage, and 412,670 primary and secondary transformer
substations, with a total transformer capacity of 153,677 MVA.
19
We are also the largest seller of electricity in Italy. The
market for electricity sales in Italy is divided into a
regulated market and a free market. Customers in the regulated
market must purchase electricity from their local distributor;
customers in the free market may choose from whom to purchase
their electricity. In 2004, we sold electricity to approximately
23.2 million residential customers, which we estimate were
approximately 87% of all residential customers in Italy. In
2004, we distributed and sold approximately 137.0 TWh of
electricity on the regulated market, and distributed
approximately 114 TWh of electricity and sold approximately 20.8
TWh of electricity on the free market (including sales to final
customers by Enel Trade S.p.A. (“Enel Trade”), of our
Generation and Energy Management Division).
We are also active in the import, distribution and sale of
natural gas. In 2004, we sold approximately 6.9 billion
cubic meters of gas to third parties, of which approximately
5.2 billion cubic meters were sold to nearly 2 million
end users.
At December 31, 2004, we also had electricity sales and
distribution activities in Spain, and on April 28, 2005, we
acquired a 51% interest in two electricity distribution and
sales companies in Romania.
In 2004, the Sales, Infrastructure and Networks Division had
revenues after intrasegment eliminations of
€19,466 million,
reflecting revenues prior to intrasegment eliminations of
€17,619 million
from our Italian electricity sales and distribution operations,
€433 million
from international electricity sales and distribution
operations, and
€1,421 million
from gas sales and distribution in Italy. In 2003, the division
had revenues of
€20,433 million,
reflecting revenues of
€18,673 million
from our Italian electricity sales and distribution operations,
€386 million
from international electricity sales and distribution operations
(which were attributed to our former International Division in
2003), and
€1,374 million
from gas sales and distribution in Italy. There were no
intrasegment eliminations in 2003.
Transmission. In 2004, our Transmission Division
comprised Terna, which owns more than 90% of the transmission
assets of Italy’s national electricity grid, according to
the latest evaluation of the Italian Energy Authority carried
out in December 2004, and all the Italian grid of high
voltage 380 kV lines, as well as its subsidiaries
Transmissora Sudeste Nordeste S.A. and Novatrans Energia S.A.,
two Brazilian electricity transmission companies. The
transmission grid that Terna owns carries almost all the
electricity transmitted to distribution networks for sale in
Italy.
In June 2004, we completed the Terna IPO, which resulted in
gross proceeds of
€1,700 million.
On April 5, 2005, we sold an additional 13.9% of
Terna’s share capital for gross proceeds of
€568 million
in a private placement to institutional investors not registered
under the Securities Act. We currently own 36.14% of Terna.
These transactions were part of Enel’s announced strategy
to reduce its stake in Terna to approximately 5%, following a
May 2004 decree implementating a law requiring the transfer to
Terna of the management and control of the national transmission
grid, together with certain assets, by the Gestore della Rete by
October 31, 2005. Upon this transfer, no electricity
operator, including Enel, shall be entitled to control more than
5% of the voting rights with respect to the appointment of
Terna’s directors. The same law requires Enel to reduce its
holding in Terna to no more than 20% by July 1, 2007.
In accordance with the May 2004 decree, Terna has amended its
by-laws in order to reflect the required 5% limit on voting
rights for electricity companies; this provision of its by-laws
will become effective upon closing of the transfer by the
Gestore della Rete to Terna of management of the transmission
network.
Terna and the Gestore della Rete in February 2005 agreed upon
terms for the transfer to Terna of the management of the
transmission grid for aggregate consideration of approximately
€180 million,
including payment of
€68.3 million
in cash and assumption of approximately
€112 million
in trade payables due to Terna from the Gestore della Rete.
Closing of the transaction remains subject to approval of the
Antitrust Authority.
In May 2005, Enel agreed to sell a 29.99% stake in Terna to
Cassa Depositi e Prestiti for consideration that, depending on
the price of Terna’s shares on the Italian Stock Exchange
in a specified period prior to closing of the sale, will be
between a minimum of
€1,228 million
and a maximum of
€1,412 million.
Closing of the sale to Cassa Depositi e Prestiti is expected to
take place within 15 days of satisfaction of all the
conditions to closing, including authorization by the Antitrust
Authority of both this transaction and the transfer of
management of the transmission grid from the Gestore della Rete
to Terna, as well as Terna’s calling of a
20
shareholders’ meeting to elect a new board of directors. As
a result of this transaction, we expect to deconsolidate Terna
during 2005.
Our agreement with Cassa Depositi e Prestiti provides that if at
the time of closing, Cassa Depositi e Prestiti already owns
shares of Terna (which it currently does not), the percentage of
Terna’s share capital we will sell to Cassa Depositi e
Prestiti will be reduced by the amount necessary to ensure that
the amount of shares Cassa Depositi e Prestiti will own after
the closing does not exceed the 30% threshold that under Italian
law would trigger the obligation for it to launch a tender offer
for all of Terna’s publicly held shares. The consideration
Enel is to receive will be adjusted to reflect the actual number
of shares being sold.
Following completion of the sale to Cassa Depositi e Prestiti,
and the distribution in early 2006 by the Company of
“bonus” shares promised to certain Italian retail
investors as part of the Terna IPO, we expect to own
approximately 5% of Terna’s share capital.
As of December 31, 2004, the transmission grid that Terna
owns, which constituted more than 90% of the national
electricity transmission grid, consisted of a total of
approximately 38,696 km of lines and 300 primary transformer
stations. The revenues of this division in 2004 were
€1,023 million,
of which
€119 million
were attributable to its transmission operations in Brazil,
compared to
€927 million
in 2003, of which
€53 million
were attributable to its transmission operations in Brazil.
Telecommunications. The Telecommunications Division
comprises Wind and its subsidiaries. In May 2005, we entered
into an agreement for the sale of Wind to Weather in a series of
transactions that we expect ultimately to lead to our exit from
the telecommunications business. Please see
“— The Enel Group —
Telecommunications — Overview” for additional
information on Wind’s divestiture. As of December 31,2004, Wind provided mobile telephony services to a customer base
in Italy comprising approximately 12.1 million mobile
customer lines and had approximately 2.4 million fixed line
customers and 17.1 million registered users for its
Internet access services. This division’s revenues in 2004
were
€4,714 million,
compared to
€4,383 million
in 2003.
Services and Other Activities. Our Services and Other
Activities Division includes, among other businesses, our
engineering and construction, information technology and real
estate services. We divested certain real estate assets through
the sale in July 2004 of NewReal S.p.A. (“NewReal”), a
company to which we contributed real estate assets having a
market value of approximately
€1,400 million,
and in May 2005 divested most of our water activities. In 2004,
this division had revenues of
€1,799 million,
compared to
€2,742 million
in 2003.
Corporate. Enel constitutes our Corporate Division and,
as the parent company, defines the strategic objectives for the
Enel Group and coordinates the activities of all of our
divisions. In addition, Enel manages finance operations and
insurance risk coverage for all Group companies, identifies
opportunities for international business development, and
provides assistance and guidelines on organizational, industrial
relations, accounting, administrative, tax and legal issues. In
2004, this division had revenues of
€1,617 million,
compared to
€1,139 million
in 2003.
The following chart sets forth our principal business units and
the main companies through which we conduct these businesses as
of May 31, 2005, as well as the country in which each such
company is incorporated. All subsidiaries in the chart are
directly or indirectly wholly owned by Enel, unless otherwise
indicated. As discussed, Enel is in the process of divesting
almost all of its stake in Terna, and we are also in the process
of divesting Wind. See the paragraphs
“— Transmission” and
“— Telecommunications” above.
21
Strategy
Since May 2002, we have streamlined our operations to focus on
our core electricity and gas businesses, including through the
divestment of a number of a non-core activities. Our mission is
to be the most efficient electricity generator in Italy and the
most efficient electricity and gas distributor in Europe by
2009, with the goal of creating value for our shareholders,
satisfying our customers and developing our employees. We have
the following short- to medium-term strategic objectives:
•
Reducing our Italian power generation costs to levels lower than
those of our competitors, in particular through the conversion
of certain generation plants to run on less expensive fuels, and
the alignment of
22
our other operating costs with international best practice
through an integrated approach to quality and standards;
•
Increasing our presence in the market for electricity generated
from renewable resources;
•
Growing our natural gas distribution and sales businesses in
Italy, where we are the second-largest distributor;
•
Extracting value from the integrated management of our
electricity and gas services in Italy;
•
Meeting our operating efficiency targets in the distribution and
sale of electricity and gas;
•
Expanding our operations outside Italy, particularly in
countries where we are already present or where market
liberalization and privatization efforts are in progress, in
which we can capitalize on the experience and technical know-how
we have acquired in the Italian market;
•
Reducing Enel’s current 36.14% stake in Terna to
approximately 5%, in order to match legally permitted voting
rights in the appointing of directors, through its sale of a
29.99% stake in Terna to Cassa Depositi e Prestiti; and
•
Divesting Wind and, subject to our disposal of the minority
interest we expect to acquire in Weather, exiting the
telecommunications business.
In addition to the interim dividend of
€0.33 per
share paid to its shareholders in November 2004, following Terna
IPO, Enel will pay its shareholders a further
€0.36 per
share with respect to its 2004 results on June 23, 2005;
the ex-dividend date is June 20, 2005. Moreover, in the
second half of 2005, Enel expects to pay an additional dividend
arising from net gains on its subsequent disposal of additional
shares of Terna. In 2006, Enel expects to pay its shareholders
dividends per share with respect to its performance in 2005 in
line with those distributed in the last three years. Please see
“Item 8. Financial Information — Other
Financial Information — Dividend Policy.”
In order to pursue the Group’s objectives, each of our
divisions has its own set of specific strategies. In particular:
Generation and Energy Management
As a result of the progressive liberalization of the Italian
electricity market and the required sale of a portion of our
generation capacity, we estimate that our share of the power
generation market in Italy has declined from approximately 63%
in 1999 to approximately 44% in 2004.
In order to maintain profitability and provide services on
competitive terms in Italy, our Generation and Energy Management
Division seeks to be the lowest-cost generator of electricity,
in particular by diversifying appropriately its use of fuels. In
this respect, we have reduced the percentage of our total
production that we generate through plants fueled by oil and
natural gas (excluding natural gas-fueled plants using CCGT
technology) from approximately 45% in 2002 to approximately 29%
in 2004. At the same time, we have increased the percentage of
electricity we generate through thermal plants fired by coal and
orimulsion from approximately 22% in 2002 to approximately 25%
in 2004 and our production using renewable resources from
approximately 24% in 2002 to approximately 27% in 2004. Our aim
is for approximately 30% of our overall electricity output to be
generated using renewable resources. In addition, we recently
confirmed our goal of achieving an aggregate reduction of 30% in
the cost of generating one megawatt-hour of electricity compared
with the level recorded in 2002.
In order to implement its strategy, our Generation and Energy
Management Division intends to:
•
Continue its program to convert approximately 10,000 MW of
thermal generation plants to combined gas turbine technology,
much of which has already been completed, as well as our program
to upgrade additional plants to run on lower-cost fuels, such as
coal, while still respecting environmental norms;
•
Consolidate its position in the field of renewable energy,
including through an investment program expected to total
approximately
€1.1 billion
from 2005 through 2009, which includes plans for the
construction of wind, hydroelectric and geothermal generation
plants in Italy with a net installed capacity of approximately
250 MW;
•
Continually seek to achieve operating excellence while
increasing the efficiency and availability of its plants and
respecting the environment and the health and safety of its
employees;
23
•
Continue its efforts to reduce its operating and maintenance
expenses until it attains best international practice
levels; and
•
Optimize its fuel procurement activities, through a
diversification of suppliers and supply channels.
Sales, Infrastructure and Networks
Distribution. We currently transport on our distribution
network more than 80% of the electricity transported in Italy.
In our electricity distribution operations, we are seeking to
face the challenges of market liberalization and changes in
applicable tariff regimes by taking action to reduce costs, and
in particular our cash cost per customer of distributing
electricity, as well as by continuing to focus on the quality of
service we provide. We intend to:
•
Continue our program to reduce operating costs and optimize our
investment expenditures, by seeking constantly to improve our
administrative processes, increasing our use of technology to
support our activities and evaluating our investments more
strictly from a financial perspective;
•
Continue to improve our performance with respect to Energy
Authority targets for quality and continuity of service in those
geographic areas where these targets have not yet been achieved,
and maintaining the quality and continuity of service where they
have been achieved or exceeded; overall, in 2004 we received
bonuses for continuity of services of
€205 million
with respect to our performance in 2003; and
•
Complete the roll-out of our “Telemanagement” digital
metering program in Italy by the end of 2005, in order to
(i) reduce costs associated with physical measurement of
consumption and on-site maintenance of meters by our personnel,
as these tasks would be accomplished remotely; (ii) measure
more accurately the electricity consumption of our customers;
(iii) improve our response times in providing technical
assistance to our customers and provide higher quality service;
and (iv) offer our customers tailored tariff plans that
promote the use of electricity in off-peak periods and provide
customers with opportunities to save money. We entered into an
agreement with IBM in March 2004 to commercialize our digital
metering know-how for use by other utilities in Italy and abroad
in an effort to further benefit from this program. At
March 31, 2005, we had installed 22.4 million digital
meters, of which approximately 19.9 million were remotely
connected to our system.
In our natural gas distribution business, our primary objective
is to operate as efficiently as possible and consolidate our
market position, through both bidding on new gas distribution
concessions and, where appropriate, acquiring additional natural
gas distribution companies, particularly where there are
opportunities for significant synergies with our existing
operations. By controlling costs and increasing our customer
base, we expect to further reduce our distribution cash cost per
customer.
Sales. In our electricity sales business, as a result of
the liberalization process, based on data from the Gestore della
Rete, we have seen our market share in direct sales to end users
in Italy decline from approximately 92% in 1999 to approximately
50% in 2004.
In this context, we intend to continue our efforts to improve
our quality of service and our cost-containment policies,
further focus on our core businesses and develop service
offerings targeted to various market segments.
In our natural gas sales business, we intend to increase our
market share and margins by selectively expanding our customer
base and increasing the volume of gas sold. We seek to increase
our customer base through targeted marketing initiatives and
promotional campaigns, as well as, where appropriate, through
acquisitions of other gas companies. In order to increase
profitability, we intend to target in particular residential and
small business customers. Our goal is to increase our total
volumes from the approximately 5.2 billion cubic meters of
gas sold to end users in 2004 to approximately 7.1 billion
cubic meters per year by 2009, and to increase the number of end
users from approximately 2.0 million in 2004 to
2.5 million by 2006 and 3.9 million by 2009.
In the future, we intend to offer integrated electricity and
natural gas services to household consumers in order to improve
the quality of service provided and achieve cost savings. In
March 2005, we launched our first
24
“dual fuel” offer, providing electricity and gas
service through one sales network, with one customer service
department and one bill.
Transmission
In light of Italian laws and regulations providing for the
unification of the ownership and management of the Italian
transmission grid and imposing certain ownership restrictions on
the entity that will own and manage it, Enel expects to reduce
its stake in Terna from 36.14% to approximately 5%, having in
May 2005 agreed to sell a 29.99% stake in Terna to Cassa
Depositi e Prestiti. Following closing of that transaction,
which we expect to take place by the end of the third quarter of
2005, we will hold approximately 5% of Terna. Please see
“— Business — Overview —
Transmission” and “Item 3. Key
Information — Risk Factors — Risks Relating
to Our Energy Business — We may be unable to complete
the disposal of the majority of our remaining interest in Terna
on the anticipated timetable or terms” for additional
information on Enel’s divestiture of Terna.
Telecommunications
In line with our strategic objective of focusing on our core
energy businesses, we view our telecommunications activities,
held through Wind, solely as a financial investment. In May
2005, we entered into an agreement for the sale of Wind to
Weather Investments in a series of transactions. The agreement
is subject to regulatory approvals. We expect the first of these
transactions, involving our sale of a 62.75% stake in Wind, to
be completed during the summer of 2005, and to dispose of our
remaining interest in the first half of 2006. As a result of
this agreement, we expect to deconsolidate Wind and its
approximately
€7 billion
in debt. Upon completion of these transactions, we will no
longer have any direct interest in Wind, but will hold an
interest of approximately 26% in Weather.
We have entered into this agreement as part of our announced
strategy to focus on our core energy business and we expect that
it will ultimately lead to our exit from the telecommunications
business. Please see “— The Enel
Group — Telecommunications — Overview”
and “Item 3. Key Information — Risk
Factors — Risks Related to Our Other
Businesses — We may be unable to exit the
telecommunications business on acceptable terms or in accordance
with the currently envisaged timetable” for additional
information on our divestiture of Wind.
Services
and Other Activities
Consistent with our objective of focusing on our core energy
businesses, in July 2004 we sold NewReal, a company to which we
contributed real estate assets having a market value of
approximately
€1,400 million,
and in 2005 expect to sell certain residual real estate assets
now held by Enel Ape S.r.l. (“Enel Ape”), formerly APE
Gruppo Enel, including Immobiliare Foro Bonaparte, Immobiliare
Porta Volta and Immobiliare Progetto Ostiense. We are also
considering selling our 49% stake in Leasys S.p.A., a long-term
auto leasing and fleet management company, to our joint venture
partner, Fidis Renting Italia, a subsidiary of Fiat S.p.A.,
during the course of 2005. On May 10, 2005, we sold
Enel.Hydro, which held most of our activities in the water
sector, for consideration of approximately
€37 million.
In addition, as of January 1, 2005, we merged Enel Facility
Management, one of our real estate companies, and Enel.it S.r.l.
(“Enel.it”), our information technology services
company, into Enel Ape, our personnel administration company as
part of our efforts to streamline and refocus this
division’s activities on providing support to the
Group’s other divisions.
25
The Enel Group
Italian Electricity Demand
Demand for electricity in Italy has grown at an average annual
rate of approximately 2.4% during the past five years. The
following table shows the annual rate of growth in Italy’s
GDP in real terms and the annual rate of growth in electricity
demand for the years indicated.
Average Annual
Growth Rate
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2000-2004
Growth in real GDP(1)
3.0%
1.8%
0.4%
0.3%
1.2%
1.3%
Growth in electricity demand(2)
4.4%
2.1%
1.9%
3.2%
0.4%
2.4%
Sources:
(1)
National Institute of Statistics (Istituto Nazionale di
Statistica).
(2)
Gestore della Rete. Data for 2004 are provisional.
Electricity demand grew by 0.4% in 2004, after having grown by
2.9% in 2003 and by 1.8% in 2002. Growth in demand for
electricity is determined by a variety of factors, including the
rate of economic growth, the level of business activity and
weather conditions. In 2004, growth in demand for electricity
slowed compared to that in 2003, when demand was affected by
unusually high temperatures in the spring and summer seasons.
The slower growth in 2004 also reflected lower demand from small
and medium-sized businesses. Please see “— Sales,
Infrastructure and Networks — Sales to regulated
electricity market.” According to data published in June
2005 by the Italian National Institute of Statistics, Italian
GDP contracted by 0.5% in the first quarter of 2005 as compared
to the fourth quarter of 2004, and contracted by 0.2% with
respect to the first quarter of 2004.
Per capita electricity consumption is lower in Italy than in a
number of other leading industrialized countries. On the basis
of the data from the Gestore della Rete for 2003, the most
recent available, we calculate that in 2003, electricity
consumption in Italy was approximately 5,208 kWh per capita,
compared to 5,160 kWh in 2002 and 5,017 kWh in 2001. As
differences in the industrial or commercial and service sectors
among countries not related to individual electricity use can
distort comparisons of overall per capita production, we prefer
to use per capita residential electricity use as our basic
comparative measure. The following table compares per capita
residential electricity consumption in Italy with that of other
countries in the European Union for 2003, the most recent year
for which complete data is available.
Per Capita
Residential
Residential
Inhabitants
Consumption
Consumption
(In millions)
(TWh)
(Kwh/inhabitant)
France
59.8
141.0
2,358
United Kingdom
59.4
117.2
1,973
European Union
380.2
685.3
1,803
Germany
82.6
135.7
1,643
Spain
41.1
53.70
1,307
Italy
57.7
63.7
1,104
Source: Enel, based on data established by Enerdata —
World Energy database — February 2005.
We believe that a reason per capita residential electricity
consumption is lower in Italy than in the other countries of the
European Union indicated in the table above is that in the past
the tariff structure established by government regulation in
Italy discouraged high-volume residential use. Please see
“— Regulatory Matters — Electricity
Regulation — The tariff structure” for a
discussion of the current tariff structure.
Generation and Energy Management
We are the largest producer of electricity in Italy through our
Generation and Energy Management Division. Our key subsidiaries
in this division include Enel Produzione, the division’s
lead company and our primary generating company; and Enel Trade
(previously Enel.FTL), which purchases fuel for all of our
26
generating operations, sells electricity to resellers,
wholesalers and customers with annual consumption higher than
100 GWh, sells gas to gas distribution companies and is active
in the fuel trading sector. Enel Trade also carries out risk
management activities on behalf of all Group companies. Please
see “Item 11. Quantitative and Qualitative Information
on Market Risk” for additional information on our hedging
activities. We also intend to carry out emissions trading
through Enel Trade, which has obtained the authorizations
required to engage in this activity.
Until May 31, 2005, our Generation and Energy Management
Division also included Enel Green Power, which specialized in
producing electricity from renewable resources, Enel Logistica
Combustibili S.r.l., active in the fuel logistics sector, and
Conphoebus S.r.l., which provided renewable energy-related
services. We merged these companies into Enel Produzione as of
June 1, 2005, uniting these electricity generation-related
companies into a single entity as part of our efforts to
streamline and simplify the division’s operations.
This division also carries out research and development
activities, mainly through Enel Produzione. Please see
“— Services and Other Activities —
Research and development” for additional information on our
research and development activities.
Unless otherwise specified, all operating data furnished in this
section excludes data for the Gencos and from our generating
companies located outside of Italy.
Domestic Generation
Generating Facilities
At December 31, 2004, Enel Produzione and Enel Green Power
together operated a total of 595 generating plants. Our Italian
generating facilities include thermal plants (which burn fossil
fuels), hydroelectric plants, geothermal plants and other
facilities that generate electricity from renewable resources.
At December 31, 2004, these plants had total net installed
capacity of 42.0 GW, representing approximately 52% of the total
net installed capacity in Italy. Our net electricity production
in 2004 decreased by 8.7% to 125.9 TWh from 137.8 TWh in 2003
excluding from the 2003 total electricity produced by
Interpower, which we sold in January 2003.
We estimate that our net electricity production in 2004
represented approximately 44% of Italian production during the
year, compared to 49.4% in 2003.
The following table shows the gross production in 2002, 2003 and
2004 for the Italian electricity sector as a whole in kilowatt
hours, broken down by type of generating plant. Net production
is the difference between gross production less consumption by
units generating electricity and mechanical and electrical
losses in production, referred to as “power used by
auxiliary installations.” Imports include electricity
purchased from foreign producers on the spot market or under
annual or long-term contracts. Pumped storage consumption refers
to the use of electricity by pumped storage hydroelectric plants
to pump water to elevated areas for use at a later time to
generate electricity.
2002
2003
2004*
(GWh)
Gross production:
Thermal
231,068
242,784
244,375
Hydroelectric
47,262
44,277
48,730
Geothermal and other renewable
6,071
6,804
7,265
Total gross production in Italy
284,401
293,865
300,370
Power used by auxiliary installations
(13,619
)
(13,682
)
(13,723
)
Total net production in Italy
270,783
280,183
286,647
Net electricity imports
50,597
50,968
45,635
Total pumped storage consumption
(10,654
)
(10,492
)
(10,308
)
Total electricity demand in Italy
310,726
320,659
321,974
Source: Gestore della Rete
*
Data for 2004 are provisional.
27
Please see “— Competition in the electricity and
gas markets” for a more detailed discussion of the
electricity markets in Italy.
The following table shows certain statistics about our domestic
generating facilities, broken down by type of plant, at
December 31, 2004, and for the year 2004. The weighted
average age of the plants does not take into account
refurbishments or upgrades after initial construction, but does
reflect the effects of the conversion of thermal plants into
combined cycle plants we had completed at December 31,2004. The forced outage factor represents the amount of
electricity that was not produced during the period because of
unplanned outages, expressed as a percentage of the maximum
theoretical amount of electricity that could have been produced
during the period.
We have no plans to construct new plants or add significant
amounts of generating capacity, other than from renewable
resources, in the near term. Instead, we have focused our
investment plans on our existing generating plants. Please see
“— Capital Investment Program —
Generation and Energy Management” for a more detailed
discussion of these plans.
Thermal Production
In Italy, at December 31, 2004, we owned 46 thermal plants
with an aggregate net installed capacity of 26.8 GW, or 63.8% of
our net installed capacity at that date. In 2004, our thermal
net production was 91,854 GWh, or 73.0% of our net production
for the year, compared to thermal net production of 106,669 GWh,
or approximately 77.4% of our net production in 2003.
All our thermal plants consist of two or more generating units
and most have a standardized design, with the generating units
being of one of three types: steam-condensing units, gas turbine
units and internal combustion units. Steam-condensing units
consist of closed-cycle plants in which water is transformed
into steam and used in a turbine to generate electricity. Steam
is turned back into water through a cooling process using sea or
river water. Gas-turbine units burn natural gas and diesel fuel
to drive a turbine and generate electricity. Internal combustion
units use diesel engines to generate electricity. In addition to
these conventional thermal plants, we own plants with combined
cycle gas turbines. At December 31, 2004, approximately 68%
of the net installed capacity of our thermal plants consisted of
steam-condensing units, approximately 6% of that capacity was
represented by gas-turbine units in repowered steam plants,
approximately 8% of that capacity was represented by gas-turbine
units in open cycle, and approximately 18% was represented by
combined cycle technology units. Internal combustion units
represented a minimal part of our thermal gross installed
capacity.
Each of our conventional thermal generating units is designed to
operate using one or more kinds of fuel. Single fuel units use
either natural gas, petroleum products or coal, dual fuel units
can use petroleum products and either natural gas or coal, while
triple fuel units can use petroleum products, coal and natural
gas. In 2004, single fuel units generated approximately 55% of
our net production from thermal plants (compared to
approximately 65% in 2003) and represented approximately 70% of
the net installed capacity of these plants at year end. Dual
fuel units accounted for approximately 45% of our net production
from thermal plants (compared to approximately 35% in 2003) and
approximately 30% of our net installed capacity of these plants
at December 31, 2004. The average thermal efficiency, or
the ratio of useful energy produced to the energy consumed to
produce it, of our thermal plants was 39.1% at December 31,2004, in line with the level at year-end 2003.
28
In 1997, we began converting a number of our conventional
thermal plants into combined cycle plants, generally by
installing one or more gas turbines and replacing conventional
boilers with heat recovery steam boilers used to drive existing
steam turbines. Converting plants to combined cycle generation
increases efficiency and reduces emissions. We plan for our new
combined cycle plants to have an expected average thermal
efficiency of approximately 56%, in line with that at our
existing combined cycle plants.
Since 1997, we have completed the conversion of approximately
4,300 MW of generating capacity to combined cycle
technology, and we expect to convert additional capacity of
approximately 750 MW by the end of 2007. We currently
estimate the average costs of conversion over the course of the
project to be approximately
€340,000 per
MW of net installed capacity, or a total of approximately
€1,700 million
through 2007. At December 31, 2004, we had spent
approximately
€1,500 million
of this total.
In addition to our combined cycle conversion program, we are
planning to upgrade additional net installed capacity of
approximately 4,700 MW by:
•
upgrading the coal-burning technology of a unit at an existing
coal plant, Sulcis, which we expect to be operational by the end
of 2005 (approximately 300 MW);
•
converting three units at our fuel-oil plant at Torrevaldaliga
Nord to clean coal technology, on which construction has already
started and which we expect to be operational by 2008
(approximately 1,900 MW); and
•
subject to receipt of required permits, for which we are in the
process of applying, converting another four units to clean coal
technology (accounting for approximately 2,500 MW).
Depending on whether and when we obtain the required permits, we
estimate that the converted facilities would be operational by
2010 or 2011.
We have made significant investments since 1990 to improve the
environmental standards of our thermal plants and to comply with
the emission thresholds established by applicable environmental
laws and regulations. These measures have included installing
desulphurization and denitrogenation units and upgrading burners
and units for the treatment of waste water and ash resulting
from the electricity generation process. Installation of
desulphurization and denitrogenation units increases our
flexibility to use different types of fuel, including lower-cost
fuels such as high sulfur fuel oil, while maintaining compliance
with emission restrictions.
Our environmental capital expenditures for conventional thermal
generation amounted to approximately
€31 million
in 2004. In previous years, these amounts had represented an
increasing percentage of our total capital investments related
to generation. However, as anticipated, in 2004, these
expenditures decreased by almost
€30 million,
or approximately 50%, with respect to those in 2003, as a result
of the completion of a major environmental investment program.
Please see “— Regulatory Matters —
Environmental Matters” for a discussion of the
environmental laws and regulations affecting our generation
operations.
Hydroelectric Production
At December 31, 2004, we had 495 hydroelectric plants in
Italy with an aggregate net installed capacity of 14.3 GW, or
approximately 34% of our net installed capacity at that date. In
2004, our hydroelectric net production was 28,659 GWh, or
approximately 22.7% of our net production for the year.
We classify our hydroelectric plants with reservoirs by fill-in
rate, which represents the time required for a plant’s
reservoir to fill from empty based on normal water flow. Pondage
plants have fill-in rates ranging from two to 400 hours and
reservoir plants have fill-in rates exceeding 400 hours. We
also have run-of-river and pumped storage hydroelectric plants.
In 2004, pondage plants generated approximately 28.1% of our net
hydroelectric production and represented approximately 19.7% of
our net installed hydroelectric generation capacity at year end,
while run-of-river plants accounted for approximately 24.4% of
our net production from hydroelectric plants and approximately
11.5% of our net installed hydroelectric generating capacity.
Pumped storage (including mixed pumped storage) plants generated
approximately 32.8% of our net hydroelectric production in 2004,
and represented approximately 52.3% of our net installed
hydroelectric generating capacity, with reservoir plants
29
accounting for the remaining approximate 14.8% of our net
hydroelectric production and 16.5% of our net installed
hydroelectric capacity in the same period.
We invested
€174 million
in 2004 on our hydroelectric plants, including on work carried
out to comply with safety and environmental regulations, as well
as on refurbishment and revamping. Our hydroelectric plants
generate electricity from water streams in the public domain
under licenses from the Italian government. These licenses
expire in 2029 and are subject to renewal. Under the Bersani
Decree, the Provincial Authorities of Trento and Bolzano, which
enjoy special autonomous status under Italian law, were entitled
to impose earlier license termination dates for hydroelectric
plants in these areas, and, if any of these licenses expire
without being renewed, we will have to transfer the affected
hydroelectric plants to the governmental authority granting the
license. The Provincial Authorities of Trento and Bolzano have
set a termination date of 2010 for the licenses they have
granted. Our hydroelectric plants in these provinces have an
aggregate net installed capacity of 1,970 MW, or 4.7% of
our current total net installed capacity.
In January 2004, the European Commission determined that certain
Italian regulations regarding hydroelectric concessions were
contrary to EU law. In particular, the European Commission
objected to renewal preferences granted to existing holders of
concessions (and in the region of Trentino-Alto Adige, to the
operator controlled by the local authorities) upon the expiry of
those concessions, as well as to the fact that the regulations
provided for the expiration of all concessions in 2029 (and for
the region of Trentino-Alto Adige, in 2010), even though these
concessions had previously been of perpetual duration. Please
see “Item 3. Key Information — Risk
Factors — Risks Related to Our Energy
Businesses — A European Commission challenge to
Italian regulations on hydroelectric concessions could adversely
affect our business, financial condition and results of
operations.”
Production from Geothermal and Other Renewable Resources
We produce energy from renewable resources, and have both
significant experience in multiple technologies, including
geothermal, wind and solar energy, as well as our own
engineering and project development capabilities. In 2004, we
conducted these activities through Enel Green Power, which, as
noted above, we merged into Enel Produzione as of June 1,2005.
At December 31, 2004, we had 31 geothermal power plants
with an aggregate net installed capacity of 642 MW. In
2004, our geothermal net production was 5.1 GWh, or 4.1% of our
net production for the year.
We also generate electricity from other forms of renewable
resources, including solar photovoltaic systems and wind energy.
At December 31, 2004, we operated 18 wind farms with an
aggregate net installed capacity of about 247 MW and five
photovoltaic solar grid connected power plants with an aggregate
net installed capacity of 4 MW. Together, these plants
accounted for 235 GWh of our net production in 2004.
Most of our revenues from renewable energy come from long-term
sale agreements entered into under the CIP 6 regime, which
provided incentives for the production of renewable energy, and
from sales of energy produced by its small hydroelectric plants,
including sales on the free market through Enel Trade. We expect
that the demand for energy produced from renewable resources
will increase as a result of current regulations requiring
producers to supply a specified amount of electricity generated
from qualifying new renewable resources. Please see
“— Regulatory Matters — The Electricity
Regulation — Promotion of Renewable Resources”
for additional information.
To comply with these regulatory requirements, we can either
produce electricity from renewable resources ourselves, or we
can purchase “green certificates” from other qualified
producers or the Gestore della Rete. Based on our production for
2003, we were required to provide approximately 2.1 TWh of
electricity from renewable resources in 2004, a slight increase
from the 2.0 TWh we were required to provide in 2003. Based on
our production for 2004, we are required to produce 2.1 TWh of
electricity from renewable resources in 2005. In 2004, we
generated 1.3 TWh of energy from qualifying renewable resources,
and purchased “green certificates” for the remaining
0.8 TWh, at a cost of approximately
€80 million.
We expect to generate approximately 1.7 TWh of electricity from
qualifying renewable resources in 2005, and to purchase
“green certificates” from other qualified producers or
the Gestore della Rete for the remaining 0.4 TWh. In addition,
we are required to provide a further amount of approximately
0.07 TWh of electricity from
30
renewable resources in 2005 in connection with a portion of the
electricity we imported in 2004. We expect to purchase
“green certificates” to cover this amount.
We have started a capital investment program in order to reach a
level of qualifying production from renewable resources of
approximately 2.4 TWh by 2006, which we believe will permit us
to meet the regulatory requirements (given the expected further
decline in our share of total generation in Italy), and may
enable us to sell green certificates to the market starting in
2006. This program is expected to result in an additional
increase in our renewable capacity (hydro, wind and geothermal)
of about 250 MW by 2009.
International Generation
Our international generation operations in 2004 included Viesgo
Generaciòn, an electricity generation company in Spain,
currently our largest operation abroad; EUFR, a company active
in Spain in the field of renewable energy; Maritza
East III, which we acquired in 2003, a generating company
in Bulgaria; Enel North America and Enel Latin America, active
in power generation from renewable sources in North America and
in Central and South America, respectively.
We acquired the Spanish company Viesgo, which owned Viesgo
Generaciòn as well as distribution companies, from Endesa
S.A. in January 2002 for total consideration of
€2,070 million,
including
€1,920 million
in cash and the assumption of
€150 million
in debt. Viesgo Generaciòn (currently wholly owned by Enel
Produzione) operates 6 thermal plants and 12 hydroelectric
plants in Spain, which taken together have a total net installed
capacity of approximately 2,264 MW.
In March 2003, we acquired from Entergy Power Bulgaria Ltd.
(“Entergy”), through our subsidiary Enel Generation
Holding BV, 60% of the share capital of Maritza East III
Power Holding BV, which in turn holds 73% of Bulgarian
generation company Maritza East III, for
€75.7 million.
Maritza East III, which has 732 MW of net installed
capacity, is working on the refurbishment, environmental upgrade
and management of its lignite-fired generation plant, located on
the border with Greece. The total financial outlay of Maritza
East III for the project, which is expected to result in an
increase in Maritza East III’s net installed capacity to
799 MW, is estimated to be about
€309 million,
to be funded through project financing. The remaining 40% of
Maritza East III Power Holding BV’s share capital
still held by Entergy is subject to put and call options
exercisable by Entergy and by us, respectively, which expire in
early September 2008.
In December 2003, we acquired 80% of the share capital of
Uniòn Fenosa Energìas Especiales (now EUFR), a Spanish
company active in the field of renewable energy, from Uniòn
Fenosa Generaciòn SA, which still holds the remaining 20%,
for total consideration of
€178 million.
We granted Uniòn Fenosa Generaciòn SA an option to
repurchase 30% of EUFR’s capital stock, which may be
exercised through the end of 2007. EUFR’s assets include
plants and projects for the generation of electricity from
renewable resources, primarily wind and hydroelectric
facilities. EUFR has 311 MW of net installed capacity
currently in operation, and more than 70 MW in development
that we expect to be in operation by the end of 2005.
We have generation operations in the United States through Enel
North America, a North American independent power producer
specializing in renewable resources. At December 31, 2004,
Enel North America operated 67 power plants in the United States
and 2 in Canada with an aggregate net installed capacity of
374 MW and a net production in 2004 of approximately 1,265
GWh. On March 1, 2004, we acquired two hydroelectric plants
in North America: Twin Falls, located in the State of
Washington, and Lower Saranac, located in the State of New York,
with an aggregate net installed capacity of 33 MW, from
General Electric Structured Finance Ltd. for $44.4 million,
equivalent to approximately
€35.2 million.
In July 2004, we acquired another five hydroelectric plants in
North America with a net installed capacity of 27 MW for
$7.1 million, equivalent to approximately
€5.2 million.
In April 2005, Enel North America also acquired full control of
the 25 MW Sheldon Springs hydroelectric project located on
the Missisquoi River in Sheldon, Vermont (in which it had
previously owned a 1% stake). We also have generation operations
in Central and South America through Enel Latin America, another
power producer specializing in renewable resources. At
December 31, 2004, Enel Latin America operated two
hydroelectric plants and a wind plant in Costa Rica, as well as
two hydroelectric plants in Chile and two hydroelectric plants
in Guatemala, which together had aggregate net installed
capacity of 195 MW and net production in 2004 of
approximately 928 GWh.
31
Enel ESN Energo, a wholly owned Russian subsidiary of Enel ESN
Management BV, on June 28, 2004, entered into a three-year
agreement (renewable for an additional year) to manage a
combined cycle generation plant near St. Petersburg with
installed capacity of approximately 450 MW with OAO
North-West CHPP, which is controlled by RAO UES, the company
that operates Russia’s unified power system. Enel ESN
Management BV is a joint venture currently held 75% by us and
25% by ZAO ESN, a privately held Russian company.
As part of our international expansion objectives and our
efforts to consolidate our presence in Eastern and Central
Europe, in February 2005 we agreed to purchase a 66% interest in
SE, the principal electric power generation company in Slovakia,
with an estimated market share of more than 80%, for
€840 million.
SE has total installed generation capacity of 6,900 MW, of
which 38% is nuclear-powered, 35% is hydroelectric-powered and
27% is powered by conventional thermal sources. This acquisition
will mark our reentry into the field of nuclear power
generation; we have not owned any nuclear power plants since
November 2000, and we have not produced electricity from nuclear
power plants since 1988. SE owns six nuclear power units, with
net installed capacity of 440 MW each, which we believe are
equipped with internationally accepted technology. Please see
“— Regulatory Matters — Environmental
Matters — Discontinued Nuclear Operations.”
Closing of the transaction, expected by the end of 2005, is
subject to certain conditions, including the transfer to a
state-owned company of the assets and liabilities of two nuclear
power plants that are in the process of being decommissioned,
including spent nuclear fuel and the radioactive waste produced
by their operations, and the disposal of a water plant, as well
as the approval by the Slovakian government of legislative
provisions on a new fund for the decommissioning of nuclear
installations in Slovakia and new rules governing the Slovakian
electricity market. The four nuclear power units that SE will
retain have been recognized by the International Atomic Energy
Association as being in line with Western European security
standards. Closing of the transaction is also subject to the
approval by the Slovak government of the strategic investment
plan we are preparing for SE for the 2006-2010 period.
In addition, on May 30, 2005, we entered into a non-binding
memorandum of understanding with EDF for an industrial
partnership permitting us to invest in the French electricity
market, including in EDF’s latest generation European
Pressurized Water Reactor, or “EPR,” nuclear reactor
project.
Under the terms of this memorandum of understanding, among other
things, Enel will have a 12.5% stake in EDF’s EPR nuclear
power plant project, expected to be fully operational by 2012.
Under the memorandum of understanding, Enel will bear its
proportional share of the costs associated with the project,
including investment, operating and fuel costs, as well as its
share of budgeted reactor decommissioning costs and the
corresponding share of the back-end fuel and waste disposal
costs. EDF will be the operator of the power plant, and will
bear any related nuclear civil liability. Enel will also receive
a share of the generation capacity and output proportional to
its initial stake in the project, which may be increased,
provided that EDF retains a majority interest. Under the
memorandum of understanding, the parties have agreed to execute
a definitive agreement by September 30, 2005, subject to
antitrust authority approval. The agreement also gives Enel the
right, starting from January 1, 2006, to access a portion
of production, increasing over time to a maximum of
1,200 MW, from EDF’s existing nuclear generation
capacity during the development of the EPR project.
The following table shows the net installed generation capacity
of our foreign generating companies broken down by type of plant
at December 31, 2004, as well as a comparison of the totals
for 2004 compared to those for 2003. Net installed capacity
excludes capacity held by unconsolidated associated companies.
Total at
Total at
Enel North
Enel Latin
Maritza
December 31,
December 31,
America
America
Viesgo
East III
EUFR
2004
2003
(MW)
Thermal
—
—
1,592
732
—
2,324
2,324
Hydroelectric
286
171
672
—
—
1,129
1,077
Wind
67
24
—
—
259
350
341
Biomass and Biogas
21
—
—
—
—
21
25
Cogeneration
—
—
—
—
52
52
62
Total
374
195
2,264
732
*
311
3,876
3,829
32
*
At December 31, 2004, 183 MW of this capacity was
undergoing refurbishing and environmental upgrades, and
549 MW was operational.
Our international operations generated 12,320 GWh of electricity
in 2004, as compared to 10,721 GWh in 2003, and included 6,062
GWh produced by Viesgo Generaciòn (5,880 GWh in 2003),
3,213 GWh produced by Maritza East III (2,756 GWh in 2003),
2,193 GWh produced by our North and Latin American companies
(2,085 GWh in 2003) and 853 GWh generated by EUFR, which we
acquired in December 2003.
Fuel
We use fuel oil, natural gas, coal and other fuels in operating
our thermal generation plants, and we also engage in fuel
trading activities. We do not use significant amounts of fuel in
operating our hydroelectric, geothermal or other renewable
resource plants. Italy has small reserves of fossil fuels. As a
consequence, we depend on imported fuel oil, natural gas and
coal for a large proportion of our energy needs.
Our fuel costs are influenced by prices in the world market for
oil, fuel oil, natural gas and coal. In 2004, the oil market
price per barrel increased from $30.11 at December 31,2003, to $40.47 at December 31, 2004, or by 34.4%. This
substantial increase was the result mainly of geopolitical
factors, such as the current situation in Iraq, instability in
other parts of the Middle East and the economic and political
situation in Venezuela, as well as structural factors, such as
high production and refinery capacity utilization levels and
increased demand in India, China and the United States. However,
we attempt to maintain secure and flexible supplies by
diversifying our sources of fuel, and are also partially hedged
against rising fuel prices. Please see “Item 3. Key
Information — Risk Factors — Risks Relating
to Our Energy Business” for a description of the risks
connected to significant increases in fuel prices. See also
“Item 11. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure
about Market Risk” for a discussion of our hedging
activities. In addition, we seek to increase our use of less
expensive fuels, such as coal, as well as fuels that have less
impact on the environment when consumed, such as natural gas.
However, generation using coal generally results in higher
emissions levels compared to natural gas. Our ability to
increase our use of coal is dependent on our ability to acquire
and implement technologies that will permit us to comply with
restrictions on emissions established by national and European
Union authorities. Please see “— Regulatory
Matters — Environmental Matters” for a discussion
of these restrictions.
We manage our fuel supply by entering into term contracts for
base quantities and supplementing these contracts with purchases
of fuel on spot markets both in Italy and abroad. Our long-term
fuel contracts, primarily for the purchase of natural gas, will
require us to pay an average of approximately
€2,173 million
per year over the next five years, based on current prices.
Please also see “Item 5. Operating and Financial
Review and Prospects — Contractual Obligations and
Commitments.”
In 2004, our fuel costs for thermal production, including fuel
transport, were
€3,426 million,
compared to
€3,970 million
in 2003. The decline of more than 13% was primarily due to the
lower volume of electricity production during 2004.
From July 1997 until the start of trading on the Italian power
exchange on April 1, 2004, the tariff structure contained
an energy reimbursement component calculated with reference to
an index of weighted average fuel prices and a consumption index
based on the efficiencies expected to be obtained from the fuels
comprising the fuel price index. Accordingly, we sought to use a
mix of fuels less expensive in the aggregate than the fuels
comprising the weighted index and to generate energy more
efficiently than the efficiency levels assumed in the
calculation of the “heat rate” used in the Energy
Authority’s consumption index. This tariff structure also
included incentives to reduce production from thermal plants and
to increase the use of renewable resources.
Since April 1, 2004, the price paid to electricity
producers is determined by competitive bidding on the Italian
power exchange or through freely negotiated bilateral contracts.
Please see “— Regulatory Matters —
Electricity Regulation — The Italian Power
Exchange” for additional information.
33
The following table provides a breakdown of our net electricity
production in Italy for the periods indicated by primary energy
source utilized. The data represent production by Enel
Produzione and Enel Green Power (which in 2005 was merged into
Enel Produzione), and for 2002 excludes production by Eurogen
and Interpower.
In 2004, the approximate percentages of our net electricity
produced by thermal generation represented by each of the
following fuels was approximately:
•
44% natural gas;
•
33% coal; and
•
23% fuel oil.
We estimate that by 2009-2010, once we have completed our plant
conversion programs, these percentages will be approximately:
•
70% coal and other fuels;
•
30% natural gas; and
•
less than 1% fuel oil.
Our subsidiary Enel Trade is responsible for the purchase and
sale of fuel for all of our domestic generating operations and
our natural gas sales and distribution operations in the Italian
market, as well as a portion of the fuel requirements of our
Spanish subsidiary Viesgo. In addition, Enel Trade buys and
sells other energy products and has land and sea fuel shipping
operations. In 2004, Enel Trade purchased an aggregate volume of
29.1 million tons of oil and oil equivalents, including
crude oil and petroleum products, coal, orimulsion and natural
gas, of which 3.6 million were sold to third parties,
compared to purchases of 35.0 million tons of oil and oil
equivalents in 2003, of which 8.2 million were sold to
third parties.
Enel Trade also sells electricity to resellers, wholesalers and
customers with annual consumption higher than 100 GWh. It also
sells gas to gas distribution companies and other third parties,
and engages in fuel trading activities, as part of its
management of, and efforts to optimize, its supply of fuel to
the rest of the Enel Group, as well as in electricity trading.
Enel Trade also trades “green certificates” in Italy,
engages in similar activities at a European level, and may
engage in CO2 emission rights trading, having
obtained the necessary approvals. In 2004, Enel Trade sold
approximately 13.4 TWh of electricity to Eligible Customers and
5.6 TWh to resellers in Italy, as well as 16.3 billion
cubic meters of gas, of which 9.4 billion cubic meters were
sold to our thermal generation operations, 5.2 billion
cubic meters to our gas distribution and sales operations and
1.7 billion cubic meters to third parties.
In 2004, Enel Trade also acquired 5% of the share capital of
Powernext S.A., the power exchange in France, for consideration
of approximately
€1.5 million.
34
Fuel Oil
We purchase very significant quantities of fuel oil, although we
continue to reduce our need for fuel oil for power generation as
a consequence of the conversions of some of our fuel-fired
plants to coal and natural gas. The following table shows the
amount of fuel oil supplied to our generation companies
purchased from domestic and foreign suppliers in each of the
periods indicated. Domestic suppliers include suppliers whose
headquarters are in Italy, including the Italian energy group
Eni S.p.A. (“Eni”), while foreign suppliers include
suppliers and refiners outside of Italy and traders of primarily
non-Italian sources of oil.
In the year ended December 31, 2004, we purchased
approximately 38% of our fuel oil on the spot market and
approximately 62% under contracts ranging in term from one to
twelve months. All purchases made on the basis of term contracts
are indexed to market prices.
The following table shows the amounts of fuel oil with low, mid
and high sulfur content that we purchased in each of the periods
indicated.
We purchase most of our natural gas under long-term, take-or-pay
contracts. The price of natural gas under these contracts is
generally tied to market prices for fuel oil. In 2004, we
purchased 16.3 billion cubic meters of natural gas, of
which 9.4 billion cubic meters were used for our thermal
generation operations. Eni, the main Italian gas supplier and
transporter, supplied approximately 38% of this natural gas.
We also continued to purchase large volumes under a supply
contract with Sonatrach, the Algerian gas producer, which
accounted for approximately 29% of the natural gas we purchased
in 2004.
In 1992, we entered into a 20-year take-or-pay contract with
NLNG, a Nigerian joint venture, for the supply of
3.5 billion cubic meters of liquefied natural gas per year,
commencing in October 1999. However, due to environmental
concerns, a once-planned Italian regasification facility has
never been constructed. As a result, we are unable to import
liquefied natural gas, and instead, in 1997, entered into a swap
agreement with Gaz de France and related transportation
arrangements with Eni whereby Gaz de France takes the liquefied
natural gas supplied by NLNG under the contract and provides us
with an equivalent volume of non-liquefied gas. We obtained
approximately 25% of the natural gas we purchased in 2004
pursuant to our Nigerian gas contract. Under current
regulations, we expect to continue to receive reimbursement for
part of our stranded costs incurred in connection with the NLNG
contract. Please see “— Regulatory
Matters — Electricity Regulation — The
Tariff Structure — Stranded Costs” for additional
information on reimbursement of our stranded costs.
We purchased 4% of our natural gas in 2004 from Edison S.p.A.
(“Edison”), an Italian gas and electricity company,
and the remaining 4% on a spot basis in the national and
international markets.
35
In 2003, we formed a 50/50 partnership with British Gas to build
and manage a liquefied natural gas regasification terminal in
Brindisi in southern Italy. However, on June 9, 2005, we
agreed to sell to British Gas our interest in the venture, which
is still in the planning stage. Under the terms of the sale,
which we expect to close on June 21, 2005, we are to be
reimbursed for costs we have incurred for the project, which
totaled
€44 million.
Of these costs, we are to be reimbursed for
€17 million
at closing, and, subject to certain conditions, for the
remaining amount within a year of the closing date.
Coal and Orimulsion
In 2004, we purchased 13.5 million tons of coal, virtually
all of which was imported, principally from South Africa, South
America, the Far East and Eastern Europe. Of this coal,
approximately 13.4 million tons were used by our generating
companies, with the remaining 0.1 million tons being sold
on the market by Enel Trade.
In 2004, we purchased 0.2 million tons of orimulsion, all
of which was supplied to Enel Produzione, as compared to
1.9 million tons in 2003. We do not currently have any
source of supply for orimulsion. As a result, we are in the
process of applying for the required permits to convert to coal
technology our fuel-oil plant at Porto Tolle, which we had
previously planned to convert to burn orimulsion. We are
currently in arbitration with Bitumenes Orinoco S.A., a
subsidiary of Venezuelan state-owned oil company Petróleos
de Venezuela S.A., regarding what we believe to be its wrongful
termination of our orimulsion supply contract. Please see
“Item 8. Financial Information — Other
Financial Information — Legal Proceedings.”
Purchased power
Our Generation and Energy Management Division purchases power to
comply with certain regulatory rules. We also, through Enel
Trade, purchase power to diversify our sources of electricity
and to reduce our costs, as well as for supply to third parties.
In 2004, our Generation and Energy Management Division purchased
approximately 13.8 TWh of power from domestic and foreign
producers.
Our Generation and Energy Management Division also purchases
power from outside Italy, through both annual contracts and on
the spot market. In addition, Enel is party to three long-term
contracts for the purchase of imported electricity. These
contracts are for 1,400 MW, 600 MW and 55 MW per
year, expire in 2007, 2011 and 2033, respectively, and were
entered into under regulations in effect prior to the issuance
of the directive implementing the Bersani Decree. Since
April 1, 2004, Enel has been required to sell the imported
electricity purchased pursuant to these long-term supply
contracts to the Single Buyer.
The table below sets forth the amount of electricity imported
into Italy that we purchased under long-term and annual
contracts and spot purchases during each of the years indicated.
The Italian electricity grid is interconnected to foreign
networks through 15 international transmission lines. We believe
these lines are currently operating at full capacity. Please see
“— Regulatory Matters — Electricity
Regulation — Imports” for additional information
on the Italian electricity import market.
In 2004, we also purchased power to comply with a new rule that
took effect with the start of trading on the Italian power
exchange requiring electricity generators to purchase the
electricity used to power pumping at hydroelectric plants from
third parties. We previously used our own electricity production
for these purposes.
36
Sales, Infrastructure and Networks
Through our Sales, Infrastructure and Networks Division, we are
the largest distributor and seller of electricity in Italy. The
division operates through two independent
sub-divisions — a sales sub-division and an
infrastructure and networks sub-division — responsible
respectively for sales of products and services and for
management of our distribution network
Our infrastructure and networks sub-division operates mainly
through Enel Distribuzione, which distributes electricity on the
free and regulated markets and sells electricity on the
regulated market in Italy; Deval, which distributes and sells
electricity in the Valle d’Aosta region in Italy; and Enel
Rete Gas, which distributes natural gas in Italy, all as
described in more detail below.
The sales sub-division operates through Enel Energia and Enel
Gas, which sell electricity and gas, respectively, as described
in more detail below. Other subsidiaries in this area include
Enel Sole and Enel.si. It is also responsible for our
international electricity distribution and sales operations.
Domestic operations
Electricity Companies
We operate in the market for the distribution and sale of
electricity in Italy through the following companies:
•
Enel Distribuzione, which owns the electricity distribution
network serving the free and regulated markets and sells
electricity on the regulated market;
•
Deval, a subsidiary in which we own a 51% interest, which
engages in similar activities in the Valle d’Aosta Region;
•
Enel Energia, which sells electricity on the free market to
customers with annual consumption of up to 100 GWh (while sales
to customers with higher consumption levels are made through
Enel Trade of our Generation and Energy Management Division);
•
Enel Sole, which provides public and art lighting
services; and
•
Enel.si, which provides electricity systems-related services.
The Italian electricity market comprises a free market, in which
Eligible Customers may participate, and the regulated market, in
which Non-Eligible Customers are required to participate and
Eligible Customers may continue to participate if they so
choose. Please see “— Regulatory
Matters — Electricity Regulation” for additional
information.
Distribution of Electricity
We own and operate the principal electricity distribution
network in Italy. We use the term “distribution” to
refer to the transport of electricity from the transmission grid
to end users. Enel Distribuzione, our wholly owned subsidiary,
holds almost all of our distribution assets and operations,
excepts for the assets and operations held by Deval in Valle
d’Aosta. Its main responsibilities consist of operating and
maintaining the distribution network, distributing electricity
to the free market and distributing and selling electricity on
the regulated market.
The following table sets forth the volumes of electricity
distributed to the free market and distributed to (and sold) on
the regulated market by Enel Distribuzione and Deval for the
periods indicated, excluding electricity distributed to
resellers.
The total volume of electricity we distributed in 2004 increased
by approximately 2.5% compared to the volume distributed in
2003. The volume of electricity we distributed to the free
market increased by 10.4% compared to 2003, reflecting an
increase in the number of Eligible Customers and their migration
to the free market. The volume of electricity we distributed
(and sold) to the regulated market decreased by 3.2% in 2004
compared to 2003, primarily reflecting the fact that since
April 1, 2004, other electricity distributors acquire their
electricity directly from the Single Buyer, while prior to that
date, we were obliged to buy electricity on their behalf. The
decrease also reflected our sale of local distribution networks
in Brescia and other smaller municipalities in late 2003. Please
see “— Regulatory Matters — Electricity
Regulation — Eligible and Non-Eligible Customers”
for additional information on consumers eligible to participate
in the free market. Including electricity transported to
resellers, we distributed a total of 257,993 GWh,
265,055 GWh and 261,239 GWh of electricity in 2002, 2003
and 2004, respectively.
We have focused on reducing operating costs in our electricity
distribution operations, as well as our electricity sales
operations, in recent years. In particular, we have reduced the
aggregate number of employees involved in these operations by
9.7% over the past three years, and by approximately 32% from
December 31, 1999 to December 31, 2004. In the future,
we expect this trend to continue but the volume of reductions to
decrease. The following table shows the aggregate number of
employees of Enel Distribuzione and Deval at the dates indicated:
We have also been investing in our Telemanagement digital meter
system since 1999 in connection with our focus on reducing
costs. Please see “— Telemanagement system”
below for additional information.
Electricity Distribution Network
The table below sets forth certain information about our primary
and secondary distribution networks at December 31, 2004.
Under-
Insulated
Bare
Number of
Transformer
Type
ground Lines
Aerial Lines
Aerial Lines
Total Lines
Substations
Capacity
(km)
(km)
(km)
(km)
(MVA)
Primary:
High voltage lines (40-150 kV)
392
—
18,699
19,114
Primary substations
2,013
89,848
Secondary:
Medium voltage lines (1-30 kV)
123,386
7,538
204,919
335,841
Low voltage lines
225,141
383,010
126,739
734,890
Secondary substations
410,657
67,459
In September 2003, pursuant to a ministerial decree, Enel
Distribuzione transferred to Terna the ownership of
approximately 900 km of high-voltage transmission lines. Enel
Distribuzione transferred an additional 100 km of high-voltage
transmission lines to Terna in 2004.
Our replacement and construction of distribution lines and
substations are subject to Italian regulatory limitations on
environmental and aesthetic grounds, including legislation on
electromagnetic fields that may make it more difficult to build
new distribution lines and substations in the future and may
require removing existing distribution lines and substations.
Please see “Item 3. Key Information — Risk
Factors — Other Risks Relating to Our
Businesses — We may incur significant capital
expenditures to comply with legislation on electromagnetic
fields; we may not be fully reimbursed for these capital
expenditures” and “— Regulatory
Matters — Environmental Matters —
Electromagnetic fields” for a more detailed description of
the environmental laws and regulations affecting our
distribution operations and the risks they pose for our business.
Consolidation of Electricity Distribution Networks
The Bersani Decree included provisions for the consolidation of
distribution networks in municipalities served by more than one
electric utility, giving certain municipal networks the right to
request that we sell our
38
distribution network in their municipalities to them. As a
consequence, we have been forced to sell a significant number of
these networks in the past few years. In 2004, we sold local
distribution networks to five municipalities, serving a total of
approximately 6,200 clients and having an annual sales volume of
approximately 154 million kWh, for an aggregate
consideration of approximately
€13 million.
From January 1, 2001, through April 30, 2005, we sold
local distribution networks, including those in the Rome, Milan
and Turin metropolitan areas, serving an aggregate of
approximately 1.57 million customers, for aggregate
consideration of approximately
€1,572 million.
At the same time, we acquired the distribution networks of
60 other small municipalities, serving an aggregate of
approximately 16,865 clients, for aggregate consideration of
€14.6 million.
Negotiations are currently pending regarding our sale of the
distribution networks of 28 small municipalities and our
acquisition of the distribution networks of certain other small
municipalities.
Local distribution companies owned or partly owned by a
municipality that serves at least 100,000 customers were
also given the opportunity to request an authorization from the
Ministry of Productive Activities to submit a joint proposal
with us for the consolidation of their electricity distribution
networks with our networks in adjoining municipalities. Certain
distribution companies, including those in Rome, Milan, Trieste,
Modena, Trento and Bolzano have expressed their interest in
purchasing our electricity distribution networks in adjoining
municipalities. We expect to conclude these sales by the end of
2005.
The distribution networks that we sold were more profitable than
our average distribution network, mainly because distribution in
metropolitan areas has lower costs because of the high customer
concentration. In 2004, the Energy Authority put in place a
mechanism to compensate affected distributors for some of the
comparative disadvantages of serving non-urban areas. Please see
“— Regulatory Matters — Electricity
Regulation — The Tariff Structure.”
In addition to the divestitures carried out pursuant to the
Bersani Decree, on December 31, 2003, we sold our network
in Brescia and 45 neighboring municipalities, which served an
aggregate of 100,205 clients and had an annual sales volume of
2.8 billion kWh, for total consideration of
€168 million.
In February 2005, Enel Distribuzione and Meta S.p.A., an Italian
energy and waste-management company, entered into an agreement
providing for the transfer to Meta of our electricity
distribution and sales activities in 18 municipalities of the
province of Modena, for a total value of
€127 million.
Closing of the transaction, which is subject to certain
regulatory approvals, is expected by the end of
2005.
On December 21, 2004, we entered into a settlement
agreement with SET Distribuzione S.p.A. (“SET”), a
company controlled by the Province of Trento, providing for our
sale to SET of our local distribution network in the province.
In 2003, local authorities had issued an expropriation order
that was intended to force us to transfer to SET this
electricity distribution network, which comprises approximately
6,700 km of distribution lines and 3,000 substations, serves
approximately 222,000 customers and employs approximately 250
people. We had appealed this order to the Administrative
Tribunal of Trentino. Under the settlement agreement, we will
sell this network and various real estate holdings related to
its operation to SET for total consideration of
€198 million.
We expect this transaction to close by July 1, 2005.
Other Divestitures
In June 2001, we sold to the Regional Authority of Valle
d’Aosta a 49% interest in Deval, which owns and operates
approximately 4,160 km of electricity distribution lines and
serves 118,243 customers in that region.
Sales to Regulated Electricity Market
The regulated market for electricity sales in Italy consists of:
•
All Non-Eligible Customers, or customers who do not meet the
consumption threshold for participation in the free
market; and
•
Those Eligible Customers, or customers who meet the consumption
threshold for participation in the free market, that choose not
to participate in it.
The consumption threshold for qualification as an Eligible
Customer, which is set by regulation, has decreased over time,
reducing the number of customers who must buy electricity on the
regulated market.
39
Please see “— Regulatory Matters —
Electricity Regulation — Eligible and Non-Eligible
Customers” for further information. The Marzano Law
provides for the complete liberalization of sales in the
electricity market from July 1, 2007, when all customers
will be eligible to purchase electricity on the free market. The
law provides that the Single Buyer will nonetheless continue to
supply electricity to consumers who choose not to leave the
regulated market.
The following table sets forth the amount of electricity we
distributed to the free market and the amount of electricity we
distributed and sold to the regulated market in 2003 and 2004,
excluding sales to resellers, broken down by type of
distribution line, as well as the revenues generated by these
activities and the weighted average price in euro cents of each
kilowatt hour of the electricity we distributed to the free
market and distributed and sold to the regulated market for each
type of distribution line. Revenues for electricity distributed
to the free market represent transport charges, while revenues
from sales to the regulated market represent both transport
charges and the cost of electricity sold. The breakdown by type
of distribution line reflects the breakdown made by the Energy
Authority in establishing tariff categories. Please see
“— Regulatory Matters — Electricity
Regulation — The Tariff Structure” for additional
information on electricity tariffs.
2003
2004
Distributed
Distributed
and Sold
Euro
and Sold
Euro
Distributed
on the
Cents
Distributed
on the
Cents
to the Free
Regulated
per
to the Free
Regulated
per
Market
Market
Total
Revenues
Kwh
Market
Market
Total
Revenues
Kwh
(Millions
(Millions
(In GWh)
of euro)
(In GWh)
of euro)
High voltage(1)
45,100
4,865
49,965
€549
1.10
45,083
4,827
49,910
€529
1.06
Medium voltage
55,532
31,263
86,795
3,312
3.82
63,372
23,966
87,338
2,782
3.19
Low voltage
2,341
105,325
107,666
11,980
11.13
5,236
108,168
113,404
11,791
10.40
Total
102,973
141,453
244,426
€15,841
6.48
113,691
136,961
250,652
€15,102
6.03
(1)
High-voltage sales on the regulated market are sales to the
Ferrovie dello Stato, the Italian railway system. All
high-voltage customers are Eligible Customers.
In 2004, the volume of electricity distributed to customers
connected to high voltage lines, generally large industrial
customers, was only slightly lower than in 2003, reflecting
sluggish industrial activity in Italy during the year.
For medium-voltage lines, which generally serve medium-sized
businesses, electricity distributed and sold to the regulated
market decreased by 23.1%, primarily reflecting the significant
increase in the number of customers eligible to participate on
the free market in 2004, many of whom migrated to that market.
As a result of this migration, distribution of electricity to
the free market over medium-voltage lines increased by 14.1%.
The amount of electricity we distributed to the free market over
low-voltage distribution lines, which generally serve small
business and residential customers, more than doubled in
comparison with 2003, reflecting the extension of Eligible
Customer status to all non-residential customers as of
July 1, 2004. Electricity distributed and sold to
low-voltage customers on the regulated market increased by 2.7%
despite the migration of customers to the free market,
reflecting the changed consumption habits of residential
customers, and in particular an increased residential use of air
conditioning. In fact, although the average temperature recorded
during the summer of 2004 was lower than that in 2003, when
Italy suffered an intense heat wave, the peak power use reached
in July 2004 was higher than that reached at any time during the
year 2003, largely due to the more widespread use of air
conditioners.
On April 1, 2004, a new pool market for the trading of
electricity, the Italian power exchange, became operational as
part of the continuing liberalization of the Italian electricity
market. Under the new system, generation companies may sell
their electricity on the Italian power exchange or through
bilateral contracts with other market participants. In addition,
as part of the new system, the Single Buyer, a company wholly
owned by the Gestore della Rete, is now responsible for ensuring
the supply of electricity to customers who
40
purchase their electricity on the regulated market. As a result,
our generation companies are now required to sell electricity
destined for regulated customers to the Single Buyer, and our
distribution companies are now required to purchase electricity
to be distributed and sold on the regulated market from the
Single Buyer. Please see “— Regulatory
Matters — Electricity Regulation — The
Italian Power Exchange” and “— Regulatory
Matters — Electricity Regulation — The
Single Buyer” for additional information.
Telemanagement System
Starting in 1999, we have been rolling out our
“Telemanagement” digital metering system in Italy, in
order to create an integrated system able remotely to manage and
read electricity meters. This system is intended to help us
(i) reduce costs associated with physical measurement of
consumption and on-site maintenance of meters by our personnel,
as these tasks would be accomplished remotely; (ii) measure
more accurately the electricity consumption of our customers;
(iii) improve our response times in providing technical
assistance to our customers; and (iv) offer our customers
diversified tariff plans that promote the use of electricity in
off-peak periods.
As of March 31, 2005, we had 22.4 million digital
meters installed, of which 19.9 million were already
remotely connected to our system. Please see
“— Capital Investment Program” for
additional information on the roll-out of this system and the
related capital expenditures we have incurred.
The Telemanagement system has permitted Enel Distribuzione,
starting in 2004, to launch new tariff options for residential
customers tailored to customers’ consumption habits. The
Telemanagement system permits us to monitor precisely when a
customer is consuming electricity and apply and bill the
relevant peak/off-peak prices. In particular, we offer a
so-called “Night and Day” tariff, which sets
electricity prices according to the time of day in which
customers use electricity, allowing them to control more
effectively their electricity expenses. In 2005, we launched two
additional tariff options, the so-called “One” tariff,
tailored for customers with low consumption who prefer to pay a
flat fee, and the so-called “August” tariff, tailored
for customers with a holiday house, to permit them to pay for
electricity service only for the period in which they use their
property.
Customer Service
Providing high-quality customer service is an important part of
our commercial strategy. In recent years, Enel Distribuzione has
reorganized its sales network to change the manner in which
customer relations are managed. We have expanded our customer
services to provide customers with access to us through a number
of different channels, and we have introduced specialized
departments to manage relations with corporate and individual
customers. Among other things, we have a customer call center,
targeted primarily at individual consumers, and provide a
self-service area through our Internet portal. The call center
is supported by both a national documentation center located in
southern Italy, which receives, processes and electronically
files all contractual documentation, and by a national printing
center, which prints and distributes all correspondence with
customers. As of December 31, 2004, our customer service
network also included approximately 140 retail locations
managed directly by Enel Distribuzione, 200 key account managers
dedicated to mid-size business customers and 1,100
“QuiEnel” retail locations, which include QuiEnel
points in Enel.si and Wind stores and in approximately 100 post
offices.
Continuity and Quality of Network Service
The Energy Authority has issued guidelines setting targets for
electricity service continuity (based on minutes of service
interruptions per year) and quality (such as waiting time for
appointments). The Energy Authority has also instituted a system
in connection with the targets for continuity of service, or
lack of service interruptions, whereby it grants bonuses to
companies that exceed these targets and imposes penalties on
companies that fail to meet them. Please see
“— Regulatory Matters — Electricity
Regulation — Quality of service regulation.”
Distributors that outperform the targets are paid their bonuses
through a component of the tariff structure. We have on average
consistently exceeded our continuity of service targets, and
received resulting bonus payments, for each year since 2000. In
2004, we received a
€205 million
bonus for having outperformed the continuity of service targets
in 2003. We estimate that, in 2004, our average duration of
service
41
interruptions per customer decreased to 60 minutes, or by
approximately 17%, from 72 minutes in 2003, largely as a result
of improvements in the accuracy of the method we use to
calculate this measure. We expect to receive at least
€45 million
in bonus payments with respect to continuity of service for 2004.
In May 2005, the Energy Authority issued proposals for public
comment for the institution of a system of automatic
compensation payable by electricity distributors to affected
customers in the event of a blackout or other widespread and
prolonged service interruption. Please see
“— Regulatory Matters — Electricity
Regulation — Quality of service regulation.”
Sales of Electricity to the Free Market
Since July 1, 2004, all Italian non-residential customers,
or approximately 7 million consumers, have qualified as
Eligible Customers, and may choose to purchase electricity on
the free market.
According to our internal estimates, total Italian electricity
consumption on the free market in 2004 was 128 TWh, representing
approximately 43% of total Italian electricity consumption for
the year. We believe our share of the free market in 2004 was
approximately 16%. In 2004, approximately 78% of the electricity
distributed in Italy was distributed to Eligible Customers. We
estimate that in 2003, total Italian electricity consumption on
the free market was 112 TWh, or approximately 37% of total
Italian electricity consumption for the year. We estimate that
our share of the free market in 2003 was approximately 10%.
In 2004, Enel Energia continued to focus its operation on sales
to Eligible Customers with annual consumption up to 100 GWh.
Enel Energia sold 7.5 TWh of electricity to 2,700 Eligible
Customers during 2004, generating revenues of
€648 million.
The amount of electricity sold by Enel Energia on the free
market in 2004 was approximately 23% higher than the 6.1 TWh
sold in 2003, which generated revenues of
€510 million.
Consumers with annual consumption above 100 GWh are now served
by Enel Trade in our Generation and Energy Management Division.
In 2004, Enel Trade sold approximately 13.4 TWh of electricity
to Eligible Customers, as well as 5.5 TWh to resellers in Italy.
In 2003, Enel Trade sold 4.6 TWh of electricity to Eligible
Customers, and 15.4 TWh of electricity to resellers, who since
April 1, 2004, have purchased their electricity directly
from the Single Buyer.
The progressive liberalization of the Italian electricity market
requires that Enel Energia provide its customers with
increasingly flexible and competitive services that go beyond
providing a reliable supply of electricity.
As part of our marketing efforts, we have implemented a series
of customer initiatives including:
•
specially tailored contract terms for different types of
customers; and
•
value-added services such as energy monitoring and management.
International Operations
The international activities of our Sales, Infrastructure and
Network Division include our electricity distribution and sales
activities outside of Italy.
Our international distribution and sales activities currently
include two wholly owned subsidiaries in Spain: Electra de
Viesgo Distribuciòn SL, which owns 29,442 kilometers of
distribution network and distributed 5,000 GWh of electricity to
611,000 customers in the Spanish regulated market in 2004, and
Viesgo Energia SL, which sold 749 GWh of electricity in the
Spanish free market in 2004.
In accordance with EU law, electricity sales in Spain are also
divided between a free and a regulated market. Please see
“Regulatory Matters — Electricity
Regulation” for a discussion of relevant EU law. The
following table shows our electricity sales on the regulated and
free markets in Spain, as well as the electricity transported on
our distribution network in Spain in each of the years indicated.
2002
2003
2004
Electricity sales on the regulated market (TWh)
3.594
3.734
3.709
Electricity sales on the free market (TWh)
N/A
0.209
0.749
Electricity transported on our distribution network (TWh)
4.939
5.102
5.308
42
On April 28, 2005, Enel Distribuzione acquired a 51%
interest in each of Electrica Banat S.A and Electrica Dobrogea
S.A., two electricity distribution and sales companies,
purchasing approximately 25% of each of the companies’
share capital from Electrica S.A., a Romanian state-owned
company, and subscribing to capital increases by each to acquire
the additional 26% stakes, for aggregate consideration of
€112 million.
Electrica Banat S.A., which operates in western Romania, and
Electrica Dobrogea S.A., which operates in eastern Romania,
together serve approximately 1.4 million customers on
networks with an aggregate of more than 68,000 km of lines, and
together have a share of approximately 20% of the electricity
distribution and sales market in Romania. We expect these two
companies to undertake major investment programs to modernize
their distribution networks in order to increase efficiency and
the quality of service.
Public and Art Lighting
Enel Sole operates our public lighting services in Italy. Enel
Sole targets the general market for public lighting, as well as
the market for customized lighting systems for monuments, public
squares, churches and other landmarks and public spaces. Enel
Sole offers both indoor and outdoor lighting systems, and
provides maintenance services for the systems and the related
electricity plants.
In 2004, Enel Sole built lighting systems for third parties with
an aggregate value of approximately
€41 million.
In addition, Enel Sole in 2004 signed new contracts for
approximately 79,000 public lighting points throughout Italy. As
of December 31, 2004, Enel Sole managed approximately
1.8 million public lighting sites in more than 4,000 client
municipalities. In the first quarter of 2005, Enel Sole signed
new contracts to build lighting systems for third parties with a
total value of approximately
€7.5 million.
Electricity Systems-related Services
Enel.si offers our clients electricity systems-related services
through a franchising network made up of selected companies
which operate in the electrical maintenance and installation
business. Enel.si franchises draw on the technical capabilities
of the Enel Group to assist clients in optimizing their use of
electricity, as well as to offer them consulting and personnel
training services.
At the end of 2004, Enel.si had a total of 555 franchise stores
focusing on the retail market (residential and small office/home
office customers), offering services and products aimed at
providing safety (such as safer electrical installations and
security systems), energy efficiency (such as air conditioning,
heating, and home automation systems) and environmentally
friendly energy systems (such as solar, thermal and small
photovoltaic plants).
Enel.si also has a business services unit that provides business
customers full assistance with their energy facilities,
including construction and maintenance services for small
co-generation power plants and medium-large photovoltaic plants.
Gas Distribution and Sales
We distribute and sell natural gas to end users in Italy through
the following companies:
•
Enel Rete Gas, into which our subsidiaries Enel Distribuzione
Gas, GE.AD and Sicilmetano S.p.A. (“Sicilmetano”) were
merged as of December 31, 2004, as well as through Ottogas
Rete S.r.l. (“Ottogas Rete”) and Italgestioni S.r.l.
(“Italgestioni”), both of which were acquired in the
second half of 2004, and other minor companies; these companies
all own local distribution networks in specific parts of Italy
and hold the related concessions for their use; and
•
Enel Gas, into which Sicilmetano Energy S.r.l.
(“Sicilmetano Energy,” and together with Sicilmetano,
the “Sicilmetano Group”) was merged as of
December 31, 2004, as well as Ottogas Vendita S.r.l.
(“Ottogas Vendita”) and Italgestioni Gas S.r.l.
(“Italgestioni Gas”), both of which were acquired in
the second half of 2004; these companies all sell natural gas to
end users.
The Italian natural gas market is undergoing a process of
liberalization. Under current legislation, the natural gas
market was supposed to have been completely liberalized as of
January 1, 2003, with all consumers able to freely choose
their supplier and all sellers able to freely set prices to all
customers. However, while all consumers are now able to freely
choose their supplier, the Energy Authority retained the right
to control prices for certain, mainly household consumers that
qualified as Gas Non-Eligible Customers as of January 1,
43
2003. Please see “— Regulatory
Matters — Gas Regulation — Gas Eligible and
Non-Eligible Customers.” The Energy Authority must decide
by July 31, 2005, whether to allow suppliers to freely set
the prices charged to Gas Non-Eligible Customers. Please see
“— Regulatory Matters — Gas
Regulation” for a more detailed discussion of gas
regulation in Italy.
While full market liberalization is still developing, we believe
that the most effective way for us to build our gas business is
through acquisitions of other distributors or client bases. We
believe that expanding our gas distribution activities offers us
opportunities for potential synergies, including, for example,
the ability to schedule and perform gas and electric network
maintenance and upgrades in the same area at the same time and
the ability to use call centers for both gas and electricity
customers, as well as certain competitive advantages, including
potential cost savings from economies of scale. Since March
2005, we have offered Eligible Customers in certain Italian
cities, including Rome and Milan, “dual fuel”contracts, providing electricity and gas service through one
sales network, with one customer service department and one bill.
We have acquired several natural gas distribution companies with
operations in various Italian regions over the past several
years. These acquisitions include those of the Colombo Gas Group
in 2000, So.ge.gas S.p.A. and Agas S.p.A. in 2001, Camuzzi
Gazometri (subsequently renamed Enel Rete Gas) in 2002 and
Sicilmetano, Ottogas Rete and Italgestioni in 2004. Through
these acquisitions, as of 2003, we had become the second-largest
operator in the Italian gas distribution market, second only to
Eni’s subsidiary, Italgas S.p.A., the incumbent provider,
according to a study of the Italian gas industry by Mediocredito
Centrale in April 2004. In acquiring Camuzzi Gazometri, we
acquired both significant gas distribution assets and Camuzzi
Gazometri’s waste management operations. In February 2004,
we sold Camuzzi’s waste management operations, the Aimeri
Group, to Green Holding S.r.l. for approximately
€14 million.
In January 2004, we acquired Sicilmetano and Sicilmetano Energy,
subsequently merged into Enel Rete Gas and Enel Gas,
respectively, which distributed and sold gas to 37,000 customers
in Sicily, for
€40 million.
On September 15, 2004, we acquired from Metanambiente
S.p.A. 100% of two natural gas companies — a
distribution company, Ottogas Rete, and a sales company, Ottogas
Vendita — for an aggregate purchase price of
€31.5 million.
These companies together have approximately 36,000 customers in
the provinces of Naples and Salerno. In December 2004, we
acquired 100% of Italgestioni, a distribution company, and
Italgestioni Gas, a sales company, which together serve
approximately 34,000 customers in 83 municipalities in the
provinces of Calabria and Naples, for
€32 million.
We also intend to merge Ottogas Rete and Italgestioni into Enel
Rete Gas, and Ottogas Vendita and Italgestioni Gas into Enel
Gas, by June 30, 2005.
As of December 31, 2004, we offered natural gas
distribution services in 1,188 municipalities (as compared to
1,024 in 2003) and operated on approximately 29,500 km of
network. In 2004, we distributed 139 million cubic meters
of gas on behalf of gas companies that are not part of the Enel
Group (as compared to 89 million in 2003) and
3.7 billion cubic meters to end users, an increase of 36%
from 2.7 billion in 2003. As of December 31, 2004, we
distributed natural gas to 1,966,264 end users (as compared to
1,785,215 in 2003), or approximately 11.6% of natural gas
customers in Italy, based on figures provided by Anigas, the
Italian association of natural gas distribution companies.
In 2004, we sold approximately 5.2 billion cubic meters of
natural gas to nearly 2.0 million end users (as compared to
4.4 billion cubic meters of natural gas to approximately
1.8 million end users in 2003), also approximately 11.6% of
natural gas customers in Italy. The following table shows the
total amount of natural gas we sold to end users in 2003 and
2004 in millions of cubic meters, and the number of customers to
whom these sales were made, broken down by type of customer.
2003
2004
Retail (millions of
m3)
2,665
2,783
Business
1,780
2,403
Natural gas sold
4,445
5,186
Retail
1,794,019
1,963,577
Business
1,634
2,038
Number of customers
1,795,653
1,965,615
44
These figures do not include the 1.7 billion cubic meters
and 2.3 billion cubic meters of gas sold to third parties
in 2004 and 2003, respectively, by Enel Trade, which is part of
our Generation and Energy Management Division. The 26.1% decline
in sales by Enel Trade was primarily the result of the expiry of
certain supply contracts with former Gencos Edipower and Tirreno
Power.
Competition in the Electricity and Gas Markets
We face competition in the markets for electricity generation,
and sales of electricity and gas. We do not face competition in
the market for electricity or gas distribution, which are
natural local monopolies.
Electricity generation. In 2004, we accounted for
approximately 44% of domestic electricity production. We
purchased approximately 34% of the electricity imported into
Italy, and also purchased electricity produced by independent
power producers and electricity produced from renewable
resources under the CIP 6 regime, which the Gestore della Rete
buys from producers and resells at auction on the free market.
As a result of limitations on the production and import of
electricity imposed by the Bersani Decree, we were required to
sell plants with a total installed net capacity of at least 15.0
GW by January 1, 2003. In order to comply with the
requirement, we created and sold the Gencos, after transferring
an aggregate of approximately 16.0 GW of gross installed
capacity to them. At December 31, 2004, we estimate that we
had approximately 52% of total Italian net installed capacity,
as compared to approximately 75% at the start of 2001.
The disposal of the Gencos has exposed us to increasing
competition from other generating companies. Our competitors
also include domestic independent power producers, municipal
utility companies and foreign operators that have acquired
Italian generation assets or export electricity to the Italian
market. In addition to the introduction on April 1, 2004,
of trading on the Italian power exchange, we expect that
competition will increase further due to:
•
An increase in bilateral contracts between our competitors and
final customers;
•
Regulations limiting each operator’s access to
international electricity sources to a maximum percentage of
available interconnection capacity; and
•
The construction of new generation facilities by our competitors
and the development of new interconnection lines that will
increase the volume of electricity that may be imported in
Italy. Through 2004, other producers were authorized to build
approximately 19 GW of new generating capacity in Italy, of
which approximately 2.5 GW is already operational, and another
8.7 GW is expected to be operational by 2009. For imports, we
expect an additional 2.1 GW of capacity to become available
between 2005 and 2009, of which 1.3 GW of import capacity has
already become available.
In addition, on May 7, 2005, the Energy Authority issued
for public comment proposals for possible measures to promote
competition in the wholesale electricity market and limit the
impact of market power held by dominant producers. Please see
“Item 4. Information on the Company —
Regulatory Matters — Electricity
Regulation — The Italian Power Exchange” for
additional information on these proposals.
Our main competitors in Italy are Edison, the three former
Gencos — Edipower, Endesa Italia and Tirreno
Power — and Eni. According to their respective annual
reports, in 2004, Edipower had a reported installed capacity of
7.4 GW, Edison had a reported capacity of 6.3 GW, Endesa Italia
had a reported capacity of 6.3 GW, Eni had a reported capacity
of 3.3 GW and Tirreno Power had a reported capacity of 3 GW.
The following table sets forth the main energy producers in
Italy and the amount of energy they produced in 2004 in GWh. It
also shows this production as a percentage of the total amount
of energy produced in Italy during the year, as well as the
percentage of the electricity demand in Italy during the year
that was met by
45
such production. Italian electricity demand has historically
exceeded the amount of electricity produced in the country each
year, with the difference being made up through electricity
imports.
Percentage of Total
Percentage of
Producer
2004 Production
Italian Output
Demand
(GWh)
Enel
125,868
44
%
36
%
Former Gencos
52,186
18
%
16
%
Edison*
35,552
12
%
11
%
Eni
13,900
5
%
4
%
Main municipal electricity companies*
9,450
3
%
3
%
Other independent power producers
49,691
17
%
15
%
Total production in Italy
286,647
100
%
—
Pumped storage consumption
(10,308
)
—
—
Net imports
45,635
—
14
%
Total demand in Italy
321,974
—
100
%
Source:
Enel elaboration based on provisional data for Italy from the
Gestore della Rete, and publicly available information of other
producers.
*
Excluding stakes in former Gencos.
The following table shows the main energy producers in Italy and
our estimates of the net installed capacity of each producer in
MW, as well as the total net installed capacity in Italy, for
each of the years indicated.
Net Installed Capacity (MW) by Producer
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
Enel
56,348
49,971
43,752
41,846
42,047
Former Gencos
—
6,218
13,226
15,837
15,837
Enipower
985
1,025
1,025
1,930
3,330
Edison
7,000
7,000
7,000
7,000
7,000
Main municipal electricity companies*
2,500
2,500
2,610
2,690
2,795
Other independent power producers
8,671
9,496
8,963
8,947
8,991
Total net installed capacity in Italy
75,504
76,210
76,576
78,250
80,000
Source: Enel estimates.
*
Excluding stakes in former Gencos.
The main municipal electricity companies are AEM S.p.A., ACEA
S.p.A. and AEM Torino S.p.A. They are each publicly traded, but
remain majority-owned by the relevant municipality. ACEA S.p.A.,
through Acea-Electrabel Produzione S.p.A. (a joint venture in
the electricity generation business with Electrabel SA of
Belgium), has approximately 1.7 GW of net installed capacity
(including their share in Tirreno Power’s generating
capacity as participants in the consortium that acquired this
former Genco). AEM S.p.A. has approximately 1.3 GW of generation
capacity, and AEM Torino S.p.A. has approximately 0.5 GW of
capacity (excluding their respective shares in Edipower’s
generating capacity as participants in the consortium that
acquired this former Genco). The data for AEM S.p.A. also do not
reflect its plans to acquire joint control of Edison together
with EDF, as announced in May 2005. In addition to their
electricity businesses, these companies offer gas and/or water
services.
Electricity sales on the free market. For sales on the
free market, we compete with independent and other power
producers, importers, wholesalers and brokers. We expect
competition in the free market to increase further following the
Energy Authority’s decision to permit all non-residential
customers to qualify as Eligible Customers as of July 1,2004.
46
Gas sales. In our gas business, we compete mainly with
Eni, the incumbent operator that historically held a monopoly
for gas distribution and sales activities in Italy and continues
to hold a significant majority of the overall market for such
activities. In 2004, our share of the market for natural gas
sales to end users, based on number of customers served, was
approximately 11.6%.
The Italian gas market is currently going through a process of
liberalization. Please see “— Regulatory
Matters — Gas Regulation” for a discussion of the
regulation of the gas market.
Seasonality of Electricity and Gas Consumption
Electricity and gas consumption in Italy is somewhat seasonal.
Since use of artificial light is highest in the winter,
electricity and gas consumption peaks during the winter months.
Nevertheless, increased use of air conditioning has rendered
less significant the difference in electricity demand during
winter versus summer months, and increased use of gas for
industrial production has rendered less significant the
difference in gas demand during winter versus summer months.
Electricity and gas consumption is particularly low in August,
the traditional vacation period in Italy.
Transmission
Terna, which together with its subsidiaries constitutes our
Transmission Division, owns a large majority of the Italian
national transmission grid. We use the term
“transmission” to refer to the transport of
electricity on high and very high voltage interconnected
networks from the plants where it is generated (or, in the case
of imported energy, from the points of acquisition) to
distribution systems. Terna is responsible for the management,
maintenance and development of the national transmission grid,
based on guidelines provided by the Gestore della Rete. Enel
currently owns 36.14% of Terna, and it intends to reduce its
stake in Terna to approximately 5%. Please see
“— Business — Overview —
Transmission” for a detailed description of recent
transactions involving Terna.
approximately 10,172 km of 380kV or 400kV interconnections,
including those connecting Italy and Greece;
•
approximately 9,982 km of 200kV or 220kV interconnections,
including those connecting Sardinia, Corsica and the Italian
mainland;
•
approximately 18,542 km of interconnections of 150kV, 132kV or
less;
•
300 substations; and
•
certain other fixed assets.
The following table provides certain data about Terna’s
transmission grid as of December 31, 2004.
Type of Facility
Number
Length
(km)(1)
Primary transformer stations
300
—
Transformers
569
—
Busbar connections
3,902
—
380kV lines
—
10,172
220kV lines
—
9,982
150kV and 132kV lines
—
18,542
Total lines
—
38,696
(1)
Length in kilometers refers to circuit line length.
47
The following table shows the “availability” of
Terna’s grid reported for each of the periods indicated.
“Availability” refers to the percentage of time
transmission lines are capable of providing service, whether
they actually are in service or not.
This calculation does not take into account times the network
was unavailable due to required upgrading work and to external
causes, including in particular the blackout on
September 28, 2003.
Terna’s transmission lines make use of rights of way
granted by local authorities in areas where its facilities are
located. In addition, Terna has rights of eminent domain over
private property. Terna is required to compensate landowners for
any exercise of these rights.
The Gestore della Rete decides on the construction and
installation of new connections and new transformer or switching
substations, upgrades of existing facilities or the
decommissioning of existing facilities. If such decisions relate
to the transmission grid owned by Terna, Terna is requested by
the Gestore della Rete to implement them.
If they relate to new portions of the Italian grid, contracts
for such development projects are put out to tender by the
Gestore della Rete. In the three-year period ended
December 31, 2004, 16 out of 24 such contracts were awarded
to Terna. For this type of development activity, Terna receives
an annual fee upon commencement of operations of the facilities
and typically continuing for 20 years, in the case of
transformer or switching substations, and 35 years, in the
case of high voltage and very-high voltage electricity
transmission lines.
In 2004, Terna continued to implement a program to reduce the
operating costs of, and capital expenditures on, its electricity
transmission grid through the development of a remotely managed
and controlled system, the full deployment of a new
organizational structure based on centralized management and a
management information system. Terna has also implemented a
“Monitor and Business Intelligence” project, an
e-maintenance platform to monitor the operation and maintenance
of its transmission grid, using particular tools that allow it
to evaluate the condition of components of the system and to
decide if and when to provide maintenance to any such components.
To diversify its revenue base, Terna has begun to sell
maintenance, long-distance metering and monitoring and related
engineering and operating services (as well as telecommunication
services) to third parties which own or utilize high voltage
power systems, including other electric companies, municipal
utilities and large industrial plants. In 2004, Terna sold
services with an aggregate value of
€61.4 million
(after intrasegment eliminations). Terna received approximately
75% of this amount from companies belonging to the Enel Group.
Since December 31, 2003, Terna has owned Novatrans Energia
S.A. and Trasmissora Sudeste-Nordeste S.A., or TSN, which both
operate in the electricity transmission sector in Brazil, with
an aggregate of 2,355 km of transmission lines. These
companies had previously been held by our Services and Other
Activities Division. Please see “Item 5. Operating and
Financial Review and Prospects — The Electricity
Market Regulatory Framework — Comparability of
Information — Business Segment.” Each of TSN and
Novatrans Energia is responsible for the operation and
maintenance of a portion of the Brazilian transmission grid,
with respect to which each of them has been granted a 30-year
concession by the Brazilian Energy Authority, expiring on
December 20, 2030.
Telecommunications
Overview
We currently own 100% of Wind, a telecommunications company
providing mobile and fixed-line telephony, Internet and data
transmission services in Italy that we view solely as a
financial investment, consistent with our strategy of focusing
on our core energy businesses.
48
On May 26, 2005, we agreed to sell a 62.75% interest in
Wind to Weather Investments, a company controlled by Naguib
Sawiris, who also controls Egypt-based mobile phone operator
Orascom. Under the agreement, which is subject to Antitrust
Authority and Communications Authority approval, Enel will pay
approximately
€300 million
in cash in exchange for a 5.2% stake in Weather. At the same
time, Weather Investments will contribute
€500 million
in cash, as well as 50% plus one share of Orascom’s share
capital, to Weather. We will then sell to Weather Investments an
initial 62.75% stake in Wind for cash consideration of
approximately
€3 billion.
Enel will also subscribe to a
€400 million
increase in Wind’s share capital through the conversion of
a shareholder loan and other intercompany debts owed by Wind to
Enel. We expect these transactions to be completed during the
summer of 2005, subject to receipt of the necessary regulatory
approvals. We also expect to deconsolidate Wind and its
approximately
€7 billion
in debt during 2005.
In addition, our agreement with Weather Investments contemplates
a put and call arrangement under which, in exchange for
approximately
€330 million
in cash, Weather Investments can require us to sell to it an
additional stake of 6.23% during a period from January 15
through March 15, 2006, and we can require Weather
Investments to buy this additional stake in Wind in the period
from March 15 through June 30, 2006. The agreement also
contemplates that, during the period starting on
January 15, 2006, and ending on June 30, 2006, Enel
will subscribe for an increase in Weather’s share capital
through the contribution of its remaining stake in Wind, net of
any possible transfer of shares pursuant to the put and call
arrangement, as a result of which Enel would receive an
additional interest of approximately 21% in Weather.
Following the eventual completion of all of these transactions,
in exchange for our entire stake in Wind, we will (i) have
received consideration of approximately
€3 billion
and (ii) hold a 26.1% stake in Weather (which will
indirectly own 100% of Wind’s share capital and 50% plus
one share of Orascom’s share capital).
Consistent with our goal of exiting the telecommunications
business, the shareholders’ agreement we expect to enter
into with Weather Investments in connection with this
transaction contemplates an initial public offering of Weather
as soon as possible, market conditions permitting, although we
and Weather Investments will agree, subject to certain
exceptions, not to sell our interests in Weather until this
expected initial public offering, and no assurance can be given
that we will be able to dispose of our interest in Weather on
favorable terms, or at all. Please see “Item 3. Key
Information — Risk Factors — Risks Related
to Our Other Businesses — We may be unable to exit the
telecommunications business on acceptable terms or in accordance
with the currently envisaged timetable.”
Wind operates throughout Italy with its own network
infrastructure and has rapidly developed its transmission
backbone by using fiber optic cables, and is currently in the
process of deploying its UMTS network, in addition to the
existing GSM network.
Wind also indirectly owns 50% plus one share of Tellas
Telecommunications SA, a joint venture with Greek electricity
operator Public Power Corporation, which in 2003 launched fixed
telephony and Internet services in Greece. At December 31,2004, the joint venture had approximately 696,000 fixed lines.
The Italian Communications Market
Italy is one of the largest telecommunications markets in
Europe, with a population of approximately 58 million
people, who, based on the information provided by the
telecommunications operators, utilized an aggregate of
approximately 63 million mobile telephone lines, as of
December 31, 2004. The Italian market also had
approximately 28 million fixed line customers at that date.
Wind uses the number of lines as the primary measure for its
customer base and growth for mobile services. For these
services, the number of lines represents the number of
Subscriber Identity Module, or SIM, cards that are active. For
Internet services, Wind uses the number of registered users as
the primary measure of its customer base and growth. For fixed
services, Wind in 2003 changed its measure for customer base and
growth from number of lines to number of customers, being those
that have direct access to Wind’s network, use the
“carrier pre-selection” service, or use the carrier
selection service and have used Wind’s network at least
once in the last three-month period. As of December 31,2004, Wind had an aggregate of approximately 2.4 million
fixed line customers, 12.1 million mobile telephone lines
and approximately 17.1 million registered Internet users.
49
Mobile Services
The Italian mobile telephone market, one of the largest in
Europe, continued to expand in 2004 and, according to data
provided by the telecommunications operators, reached a total of
more than 63 million lines at December 31, 2004,
compared to approximately 57 million lines at the end of
2003. Of these 63 million lines, as of December 31,2004, Wind had approximately 12.1 million lines, or
approximately 19% of the total market for Italian mobile
telephony, compared to 9.9 million lines, or a market share
of approximately 17%, at the end of 2003. As of the same date,
Telecom Italia Mobile S.p.A. had approximately 26.3 million
lines, accounting for approximately 42% of the Italian total,
while Vodafone Omnitel S.p.A. had approximately
22.2 million lines, or approximately 35% of the total. In
2004, “3,” the fourth mobile operator, increased its
customer base to more than 2.6 million lines accounting for
approximately 4% of the total.
Fixed Telephony Services
As of December 31, 2004, Italy had approximately
28 million fixed line customers. At the same date, Wind had
approximately 2.4 million customers, corresponding to a
market share of approximately 9%, compared to approximately
3.1 million customers, for a market share of approximately
11%, in 2003. Other major carriers include Telecom Italia
S.p.A., Fastweb, Tele2, and Albacom, which focuses on the
corporate market. Competition in the fixed-line telephony market
is expected to evolve with the expanded availability of carrier
pre-selection and the unbundling of the local loop. Please see
“— Regulatory Matters —
Telecommunications Regulation” for a detailed discussion of
the unbundling of the local loop.
Internet Services
As of December 31, 2004, Wind had approximately
17.1 million registered Internet users, of which
approximately 2.8 million were active, compared to
15.2 million registered users, of which approximately
3.4 million were active, in 2003. Other Internet service
providers include Telecom Italia S.p.A., Fastweb and Tiscali.
Products and Services
Wind offers a number of mobile and fixed-line telephony
products, Internet and other value-added services to corporate
and residential customers. Wind also currently provides the Enel
Group with most of its key telephony and other
telecommunications services under an outsourcing contract, which
was renewed with effect from January 1, 2005, for a
four-year term expiring December 31, 2008, automatically
renewable for an additional year, during which a further
extension may be negotiated.
Mobile telephony. Wind offers a wide range of mobile
telephony products and services, targeted to the business and
consumer segments that integrate mobile with fixed-line and
Internet services. Wind, through an agreement with Japanese
mobile operator NTT DoCoMo Inc., also offers an enhanced mobile
service called
i-modetm,
allowing Wind’s mobile customers to access a wide range of
content and information services and an e-mail account through
their mobile phones.
In September 2003, Wind also signed an agreement with ten other
European mobile operators to offer combined services to
corporate clients, with the aim of implementing synergies,
increasing cost savings through economies of scale and
exchanging know-how on the use of advanced technologies in the
mobile telephony business.
Fixed-line telephony. Wind offers fixed-line telephony
services to business and residential customers either via direct
access to Wind’s network, via “carrier
pre-selection,” where Wind arranges with Telecom Italia for
automatic switching to its network without requiring an access
code, or via carrier selection, where customers dial a
predefined access code to select Wind’s network for local,
long distance and international calls on a per-call basis.
Costs of fixed-line telephony services are generally calculated
on the basis of the type and length of calls made. However, Wind
also offers customers calling plans tailored to the type of
consumer and their patterns of usage. In 2004, Wind changed its
available fixed price plans in order to increase its tariff
transparency.
50
Wind also offers business customers national toll-free and
shared-toll services, sells prepaid and magnetic strip telephone
cards and offers carrier and termination services in Italy to
other national and international carriers.
Internet. Wind offers a full array of Internet and data
transmission services to both business and residential
customers. Among other things, Wind manages Libero, a leading
Italian portal, and offers high speed Internet access using
ADSL, or Asymmetric Digital Subscriber Line technology, or HDSL,
or High Bit-rate Digital Subscriber Line advanced services, both
of which allow high-speed data transmission and Internet
navigation.
Network access. Wind provides its integrated fixed-line
telephony, data transmission and Internet services to
residential and corporate customers using several access methods:
•
Direct access: Wind offers direct access to its network
for its largest corporate customers through microwave links,
direct fiber optic connections or dedicated lines leased from
Telecom Italia. Wind also offers direct access to its fixed-line
customers following the unbundling of the local loop, a process
whereby Telecom Italia is required to give alternative carriers
access to Telecom Italia’s “last-mile”
connections that include the wires leading to a customer’s
home or office. As of December 31, 2004, the unbundling of
the local loop was operational through 488 unbundling sites,
covering approximately 28% of the Italian population. As of the
same date, a total of 426,000 customers had been connected
directly to the Wind network. Where the unbundling of the local
loop is fully operational, Wind’s customers are no longer
required to pay fixed-line access fees to Telecom Italia and
Wind is also able to collect interconnection fees for calls
originating on another operator’s network and terminating
on Wind’s network. Please see “— Regulatory
Matters — Telecommunications Regulation” for
additional information on the unbundling of the local loop.
•
Indirect access: Wind also offers indirect access to its
fixed voice and Internet services through either carrier
selection or carrier pre-selection.
Wind offers mobile services through its national dual band
GSM-900 and GSM-1800 digital mobile network, which applies GPRS
and roaming agreements with other Italian mobile operators. Wind
also offers its customers GPRS, the mobile technology that
provides greater bandwidth for data transmission and Internet
access. In October 2004, Wind commercially launched its UMTS
service, to provide customers with even greater bandwidth and
speed for data transmission and mobile Internet services.
Network Infrastructure and Licenses
Since Wind began operations in 1999, it has focused on
developing its technical infrastructure, as well as entering
into agreements with other telecommunications operators in order
to expand its reach and enhance coverage. Wind uses a common
system management software, referred to as its Intelligent
Network, for its fixed-line and mobile networks, allowing it to
provide integrated telephony and other value-added services to
its customers. Wind’s network infrastructure provides
high-capacity transmission capabilities, covers most of the
domestic territory and allows the delivery of new and innovative
services.
a GSM/ GPRS mobile network covering approximately 98.9% of the
Italian population and a UMTS mobile network covering the
capital cities of each of Italy’s 21 regions;
•
an 18,300 km fiber optic transmission backbone using Synchronous
Digital Hierarchy, or SDH, and Wavelength Division Multiplexing,
or WDM technology, the European standard for high-speed digital
transmission;
•
metropolitan area networks in the main Italian cities, including
Rome, Milan, Turin, Naples, Palermo, Florence, Genoa and
Bologna, comprising 2,374 km of underground cables;
•
a national voice switched network comprising 67 fixed switches
and 51 mobile switches; and
•
a packet switched data network comprising 167 Internet Protocol
and data transmission points of presence for data transmission.
51
As of March 1, 2004, Enel transferred to Wind 100% of the
share capital of Enel.net, the owner of a national fiber optic
backbone that is leased by Wind. Prior to this transfer, in
January 2004, Dalmazia Trieste had sold to Enel.net certain
radio base stations and related assets. Enel.net leases the
fiber optic backbone to Wind under a renewable contract that
took effect January 1, 1999, and is currently set to expire
at the end of 2019. Under this contract, Wind paid us initial
consideration of
€56.8 million,
as well as an additional fee of
€41.3 million
for services that had been performed in 1998 and 1999. Since
2000, Wind has paid an annual fee of
€45.1 million
under this contract. Please see “Item 5. Operating and
Financial Review and Prospects — Analysis of Operating
Results — Operating Revenues — Services and
Other Activities” for additional information on this
transaction.
Wind has also entered into a number of non-exclusive
interconnection and roaming agreements with other Italian and
with international telecommunications operators. Interconnection
agreements allow one operator to make use of another
operator’s network in order to have the necessary
connections to terminate a call originating in that
operator’s network, whereas roaming agreements allow one
mobile operator to have its customers’ calls hosted by
another mobile operator’s networks in geographical areas
which its network does not cover. Wind’s roaming agreements
include terms designed to ensure that Wind customers receive
seamless connections, full access to their subscribed services
and complete mobile network coverage.
Wind has obtained a number of licenses and authorizations needed
to build its business, including a license to provide mobile
telephone services in Italy using digital GSM-1800 and GSM-900
technology and one of the five licenses to provide
third-generation UMTS services in Italy auctioned by the Italian
government. The purchase price for Wind’s UMTS license was
approximately
€2,447 million,
of which approximately
€2,230 million
has already been paid, with the remainder to be paid through
2010. The UMTS license became effective January 1, 2002,
and expires on December 31, 2021. The process by which the
Italian government sold UMTS licenses is the subject of ongoing
investigations by the public prosecutor for Rome, as well as
other pending legal challenges. Although no assurance can be
given as to the outcome of these proceedings, Wind does not
believe that any of these proceedings will have a material
adverse impact on its ability to offer UMTS services.
Customer Care and Marketing
Since beginning operations in 1999, Wind has focused on creating
customer care systems that are accessible and convenient to use,
including an integrated billing system for fixed-line and mobile
phone customers and a system that allows Wind’s corporate
clients to pay bills, order supplies or obtain information
electronically.
Wind seeks to keep its pricing and billing policies for its
fixed-line and mobile services as transparent and user-friendly
as possible and markets its services and products through a
multi-channel commercial distribution network with over 4,300
points of sale.
Environmental and Other Regulatory Matters
Because of its relatively recent start-up of operations, Wind
has been able to take advantage of recently developed
technologies in the implementation of its quality and safety
standards. Depending on the installation context, Wind deploys
different network infrastructure elements in order to achieve
radiation emission ranges lower than the minimum levels required
by applicable Italian regulations, which are themselves more
than 50% lower than the minimum radiation emission levels set by
a number of other European countries. In addition, all plans for
Wind’s base transceiver stations include a report on
electromagnetic emissions that is submitted to the relevant
public authorities. However, if the Italian government were to
set limits on electromagnetic emissions that are stricter than
those currently in effect, Wind could be required to upgrade,
move or make other changes to its mobile telephony
infrastructure. Please see “Item 3. Key
Information — Risk Factors — Other Risks
Relating to Our Businesses — We may incur significant
capital expenditures to comply with legislation on
electromagnetic fields; we may not be fully reimbursed for these
capital expenditures.”
52
Wind, like other telecommunications providers in Italy, is
subject to regulation by both the Italian government and the
European Union. “— Regulatory Matters —
Telecommunications Regulation” for a discussion of the
regulatory framework in which Wind operates.
Services and Other Activities
In accordance with our new core-business-oriented strategy, in
2004, we undertook a specific project aimed at centralizing
responsibility for all of our services and staff activities, as
well as improving quality and efficiency, including through the
creation of shared services. As part of this process, in the
second half of 2004, we decided to merge our wholly owned
services companies Enel Facility Management (real estate and
other services) and Enel.it (information technology) into APE
Gruppo Enel (personnel administration), now called Enel Ape,
effective as of January 1, 2005, as well as to transfer
relevant staff from our core business divisions to Enel Ape,
during the first half of 2005. We also divested certain of our
non-core operations, including real estate and water activities,
and continued to refocus the activities of other operations,
such as those of Enelpower S.p.A. (“Enelpower”), on
serving Enel Group companies rather than third parties.
Following is a description of our services and other activities
in 2004.
Engineering and Contracting
We conduct our engineering, procurement and construction, or
EPC, operations through Enelpower. Directly or through its
subsidiaries, Enelpower operates as an engineering and
contracting company and supplier of integrated power systems on
a turnkey basis. Over the last 35 years, our engineering
and construction operations have designed and built power plants
with a total of 59,300 MW of gross generating capacity, and
installed or constructed almost all of the electricity
transmission and distribution facilities built in Italy.
During 2002, as part of a re-organization of the Group’s
activities, Enelpower redefined its corporate mission and no
longer targets third-party customers in domestic or
international markets, where its main activities are now the
completion of the projects to which it had already committed.
Enelpower now serves mainly as the primary EPC contractor for
our Generation and Energy Management Division. Notwithstanding
this new focus, in December 2004, Enelpower entered into a
contract with Ansaldo Caldaie S.p.A., Babcock —
Hitachi K.K. and Demont S.r.l. for the supply of three steam
generators by April 11, 2009, for total consideration of
approximately
€450 million.
In 2004, Enelpower recorded revenues (including advances on
contract work in progress) prior to intrasegment eliminations of
€953 million,
of which approximately 65% were earned from projects for third
parties, as compared to revenues of
€1,694 million
prior to intrasegment eliminations in 2003, of which
approximately 74% were from third parties.
Information Technology
Enel.it designs new tools and services to support development of
our new products and to enhance the efficiency and effectiveness
of our information technology systems; Enel.it also advises
other companies of the Group on possible uses and enhancements
of their websites, including the implementation of e-commerce
portals.
In 2004, Enel.it focused on several strategic projects,
including:
•
supporting Enel Distribuzione in completing the roll-out of the
Telemanagement system for remote metering; and
•
the “GIOVE” project, aimed at implementing a software
and hardware platform to support the gas and electricity
invoicing activities of our Sales, Infrastructure and Networks
Division, which we expect to roll out over the course of 2005.
In 2004, Enel.it recorded revenues prior to intrasegment
eliminations of
€409 million,
of which
€21 million
arose from services provided to third parties, and had 1,256
employees at year end. As noted above, Enel.it was merged into
Enel Ape, effective as of January 1, 2005.
53
Real Estate and Other Services
On December 31, 2003, Enel Facility Management (previously
Enel Real Estate), the company through which we had conducted
our commercial real estate management activities, transferred
real estate assets with a market value of approximately
€1,400 million
to NewReal, a company that we constituted with the purpose of
divesting the real estate assets contributed to it. On
July 14, 2004, we sold the entire share capital of NewReal
to a consortium formed by an investment fund belonging to the
Deutsche Bank group and CDC-IXIS. We recorded a capital gain of
approximately
€123 million
on the sale. Before the closing of this transaction, NewReal
transferred real estate assets with a net book value of
approximately
€384 million
to another of our real estate subsidiaries, Dalmazia Trieste.
Please see note 24 to our consolidated financial statements
for additional details on this transaction and the related
accounting treatment under U.S. GAAP. We continue to lease
certain of the real estate assets owned by NewReal.
Enel Facility Management is still responsible for providing
building cleaning, maintenance, security, canteen and other
services to Group companies. In 2004, the revenues of Enel
Facility Management amounted to
€167 million
prior to eliminations, of which
€9 million
arose from services provided to third parties. Enel Facility
Management is also focusing on pursuing the reduction of costs
we incur for rents of commercial offices. As noted above, this
company, which had 474 employees at December 31, 2004, was
merged, together with Enel.it, into Enel APE effective as of
January 1, 2005.
At December 31, 2004, Dalmazia Trieste owned most of
Enel’s real estate assets, with a net book value of
approximately
€480 million.
We intend to divest these assets by 2009.
Personnel Administration
APE Gruppo Enel S.r.l. (now Enel Ape) was responsible for
managing personnel payrolls, pension funds and social security
funds and providing related administration services for the Enel
Group; the company also offers similar services to third
parties. As of December 31, 2004, the company had 772
employees of its own, and provided services to a total of
approximately 65,510 people, of whom 4,691 were employed by
companies outside the Enel Group. As noted above, this company
was merged with certain other service companies as of
January 1, 2005.
Professional Training Services
Our subsidiary Sfera S.r.l. is responsible for providing
professional training services to our employees. In 2001, Sfera
launched an integrated remote training system for our employees
(Enel Distance Learning System), reaching 36,884 registered
users at the end of 2004. In 2004, Sfera developed a total of
70,446 “full-time equivalent” classroom days of
instruction.
Factoring
Enel.factor S.p.A., a captive factoring company, engages in the
factoring of receivables owned by third parties against
companies of the Group. In 2005, Enel acquired the 20% of
Enel.factor S.p.A.’s share capital owned by Meliorbanca, an
Italian bank, for a consideration of approximately
€7 million,
becoming Enel.factor S.p.A.’s sole shareholder.
Water
In 2004, we moved to complete the divestiture of our water
activities, agreeing to sell our wholly owned subsidiary
Enel.Hydro S.p.A., which included our water initiatives in
Calabria and the province of Latina, and 20% of Idrosicilia
S.p.A., which operates large scale water transportation
activities in Sicily, to Compagnie Générale des Eaux
SCA (a subsidiary of Veolia Environnement) for consideration of
approximately
€37 million.
These transactions closed on May 10, 2005. Enel and
Compagnie Générale des Eaux SCA also entered into a
put and call option for the sale to the latter of Enel’s
remaining 40% stake in Idrosicilia S.p.A. We continue to own
Enel.NewHydro, a company we formed in June 2004, which holds a
51% interest in Wisco, a joint venture company we set up with
Trenitalia S.p.A. which is active in industrial waste water
purification. Effective November 1, 2004, Enel sold to CESI
S.p.A. ISMES, a business unit with structural, engineering and
environmental activities, which had been owned by Enel.NewHydro.
54
Research and Development
We maintain our own research and development program to provide
technological innovations to our businesses. The objective of
our research and development activity is to improve the
efficiency and capacity of our core energy operations, and
expand and make more innovative their service offerings as well
as to reduce the environmental impact of our operations. We
develop new products and processes internally and also acquire
technology in the market, which we then customize for our own
purposes.
During the past three years, we have conducted research and
development activities mainly to improve the efficiency of our
generation plants and our transmission and distribution
networks, to minimize the environmental impact of electricity
generation, to develop alternative fuels and innovative
technologies so as to deliver new services through our network
infrastructure, including projects to develop hydrogen and high
temperature solar technologies. We carry out our research and
development activities mainly through Enel Produzione. We also
receive research and development services from CESI S.p.A., a
consolidated Group subsidiary until 2002, in which Enel and
Terna now hold interests of 25.9% and 15.0%, respectively. CESI
S.p.A. is dedicated mainly to the testing of electrical and
electronic equipment and to research on new electrical systems,
plants, components and applications thereof. We expect to reduce
our shareholding in CESI over time.
Our expenditures on research and development were approximately
€20 million
for 2004, roughly in line with those in 2003.
Capital Investment Program
We have summarized in the table below our aggregate capital
expenditures on tangible and intangible assets by division
during each of 2002, 2003 and 2004. During these years, we have
not incurred capital expenditures with respect to activities of
our Corporate Division. The table includes expenditures made in
2002 on the Gencos we still owned in 2002, prior to their
respective divestitures.
2002
2003
2004
(In millions of euro)
Generation and Energy Management
€
1,042
€853
€857
Sales, Infrastructure and Networks
2,014
1,764
1,711
Transmission
423
371
277
Telecommunications
1,899
854
867
Others
339
127
122
Total
€
5,717
€
3,969
€
3,834
In 2004, we incurred total capital expenditures on tangible and
intangible assets in our core electricity and gas generation,
sales and distribution businesses of approximately
€2,568 million
(of which
€2,474 million
was spent on tangible assets), and in our telecommunications
business of
€867 million
(of which
€680 million
was spent on tangible assets).
For the period 2005-2009, we expect to incur capital
expenditures on tangible and intangible assets for the Enel
Group of approximately
€15.3 billion.
Of this total, which excludes any capital expenditures at Terna
and Wind, we expect to incur capital expenditures of
approximately
€3,330 million
in 2005 and approximately
€3,610 million
in 2006. We expect to cover our capital expenditures in the
2005-2009 period with our cash flow from operations.
The following discussion analyzes in greater detail the capital
expenditures in 2004 of each of our divisions, focusing on
tangible assets, which are the most significant part of our
capital investments in our core electricity and gas operations.
55
We have summarized in the table below our aggregate capital
expenditures on tangible assets by division during each of 2002,
2003 and 2004. The table includes expenditures made in 2002 on
the Gencos we still owned, prior to their respective
divestitures.
2002
2003
2004
(In millions of euro)
Generation and Energy Management
€986
€829
€842
Sales, Infrastructure and Networks
1,900
1,665
1,632
Transmission
423
371
277
Telecommunications
1,550
685
680
Others
250
73
87
Total
€
5,109
€
3,623
€
3,518
Generation and Energy Management
In 2004, the Generation and Energy Management Division’s
capital expenditures on tangible assets were
€842 million,
an increase of
€13 million,
or 1.6%, from
€829 million
in 2003. Of the expenditures in 2004,
€820 million
were on the maintenance, upgrading and repowering of generation
plants, including
€644 million
in Italy and
€176 million
abroad. These expenditures included:
•
In Italy, the start of conversion of our approximately
1,900 MW oil-fired plant at Torrevaldaliga Nord to clean
coal technology, on which we spent approximately
€106 million
during the year, and of construction of fluidized bed combustion
facilities at a section of our power plant at Sulcis with
approximately 300 MW of net installed capacity
(€55 million),
as well as the implementation of our conversion program for
certain thermal generation facilities to combined cycle
technology at a further section of our plant at Termini Imerese,
with approximately 360 MW of net installed capacity
(€61 million)
that has now been converted, and the start of this program at
our Santa Barbara plant, which will have a net installed
capacity of 380 MW
(€41 million).
We also continued implementing our strategic plan to increase
investment in renewable generation facilities (wind,
hydroelectric, geothermal) to allow us to comply with the
regulations requiring us to provide a specified amount of
“green certificates” each year, on which we spent
approximately
€333 million
in 2004.
•
In our international operations, expenditures on Maritza East
III’s ongoing plant refurbishment project (approximately
€96 million),
as well as on developing EUFR’s generation facilities
(approximately
€52 million),
as well as other regular maintenance and other minor
expenditures to improve the capacity, efficiency and
productivity of plants in Spain, North America and Latin America.
Overall, our Generation and Energy Management Division expects
to invest approximately
€7,750 million
on tangible assets
(€7,850 million
including intangible assets) in the 2005-2009 period, of which
approximately
€5,770 million
on tangible assets
(€5,860 million
including intangible assets) is expected to be spent in Italy
and approximately
€1,980 million
abroad. We expect to make approximately
€3,400 million
of our expenditures on tangible assets in Italy on the ongoing
implementation of our program to convert oil-fired thermal
generation plants to combined cycle technology or to burn coal.
In particular,
•
For CCGT conversions, we have completed the conversion of
approximately 4,300 MW and we plan to continue the CCGT
conversion program, with the most significant projects at our
Santa Barbara and Termini Imerese power plants (for
approximately 750 MW);
•
For coal conversions, continuing the conversions of our thermal
generation plants at Torrevaldaliga Nord and Sulcis, and
beginning similar conversions of certain other power generation
units, expected to affect in the aggregate approximately
4,700 MW of net installed capacity. The conversion plans
for approximately 2,500 MW of this amount are still subject
to regulatory approval.
We also plan to invest approximately
€1,100 million
in the 2005-2009 period on developing generation from renewable
resources in Italy.
Of the
€1,980 million
we expect to spend on our international operations in the
2005-2009 period, Viesgo Generaciòn expects to invest
approximately
€1,285 million,
primarily to implement a program to convert
56
certain of its coal plants to combined cycle technology. In
addition, we expect to spend
€550 million
on further development of generation capacity from renewable
resources at EUFR, and
€130 million
at Maritza East III in Bulgaria, primarily to complete its
ongoing plant refurbishment program.
Sales, Infrastructure and Networks
Capital expenditures on tangible assets in our Sales,
Infrastructure and Network Division decreased 2.0% to
€1,632 million
in 2004 from
€1,665 million
in 2003. Capital expenditures on our electricity distribution
networks decreased 3.7% to
€1,391 million
in 2004, from
€1,444 million
in 2003, reflecting more selective investing in quality
improvements in light of the service continuity levels already
achieved. Amounts spent on our distribution network in 2004
included approximately
€550 million
relating to our “Telemanagement” digital meter
project. Please see “— The Enel Group —
Sales, Networks and Infrastructure — Telemanagement
System.” In 2004, we installed 7.4 million additional
meters, bringing the total number of meters installed at
December 31, 2004, to 20.8 million (of an expected
total of approximately 30.8 million), of which
18.5 million were already remotely connected to our system.
We expect that the Telemanagement project, for which we expect
installation of the new meters to be largely completed by the
end of 2005, to entail total investments of approximately
€2,000 million.
We also continued to invest in our distribution network in 2004;
in particular, we incurred capital expenditures of
€495 million
to enable our secondary transformer substations to better
respond to customer needs, and
€330 million
to improve the quality and continuity of our service in line
with guidelines provided by the Energy Authority. For a
discussion of these guidelines, please see
“— Regulatory Matters — Electricity
Regulation — Quality of service regulation.”
We plan to invest approximately
€6,140 million
in tangible assets
(€7,120 million
including intangible assets) at our electricity and gas sales
and distribution businesses in Italy and abroad in the 2005-2009
period. Of this total, we expect to invest approximately
€2,100 million
in ensuring new customer connections in our electricity
business. We also expect to make investments in our electricity
network of approximately
€1,400 million
targeting improving service quality, with the goal of continuing
to exceed targets established by the Energy Authority where we
are exceeding them, and, in areas where these targets have not
been achieved, improving our performance. We expect to invest
approximately
€760 million
in improving load factor and plant safety, and to make planned
investments in the Telemanagement integrated system to account
for approximately
€600 million
of the total. We also plan to invest approximately
€350 million
in developing our natural gas distribution networks, primarily
in new pipelines built either in response to customer requests
or as part of our business development policies, as well as in
improving the quality of our gas service levels and plant safety.
Our Sales, Infrastructure and Networks Division also plans to
make capital expenditures in information technology in the
2005-2009 period, in particular on a new, more customer-friendly
billing system, as well as to implement internal resource
planning software to improve the efficiency of both our
distribution activities and our accounting system. We also
expect to make investments in information technology in order to
better support customer relationships and sales activity. Please
see “— The Enel Group — Services and
Other Activities — Information Technology” for
additional information on some of these initiatives.
In 2004, Electra de Viesgo Distribuciòn SL made capital
expenditures on tangible assets of
€48 million,
primarily to upgrade its distribution network in compliance with
regulatory requirements. It is planning to make additional
capital expenditures between 2005 and 2009 of approximately
€280 million
to improve service performance and network safety requirements
and to implement its own digital meter project.
Transmission
Terna’s capital expenditures on tangible assets declined by
25.3% to
€277 million
in 2004 from
€371 million
in 2003. These expenditures mainly related to development of
transportation, transformation and/or interconnection capability
of the division’s transmission grid.
57
Telecommunications
Our Telecommunications Division incurred capital expenditures
for tangible assets of
€680 million
in 2004
(€867 million
including intangible assets) as compared to
€685 million
(€854 million
including intangible assets) in 2003. The division’s
capital expenditures were primarily for the development of
Wind’s UMTS network, in accordance with the contractual
obligations under its UMTS license, as well on extending and
improving the coverage of its GSM/ GPRS network.
Services and Other Activities
With respect to our other non-core businesses, we incurred total
capital expenditures on tangible and non-tangible assets of
approximately
€122 million
in 2004, as compared to
€127 million
in 2003, and expect to incur total capital expenditures on
tangible and non-tangible assets in all those businesses of
approximately
€115 million
in 2005 and
€35 million
in 2006.
Regulatory Matters
Overview of Regulation in the Energy Sector in Italy
The Ministry of Productive Activities and the Energy Authority
share responsibility for overall supervision and regulation of
the Italian energy sector, comprising both electricity and gas.
The Ministry of Productive Activities is responsible for
establishing the strategic guidelines for the energy sector and
for ensuring the safety and economic soundness of the
electricity and gas sectors.
The Energy Authority is responsible for:
•
setting and adjusting tariffs on the basis of general criteria
established by law;
•
advising the Ministry of Productive Activities on the
structuring and administration of licensing and authorization
regimes for the energy sector;
•
ensuring the quality of services provided to customers;
•
overseeing the separation of utility companies into distinct
units for accounting and management purposes;
•
promoting competition; and
•
otherwise protecting the interests of consumers, including the
authority to mediate disputes between utilities and consumers,
and to impose sanctions for violations of regulations.
The EU also takes an active role in energy regulation by means
of its legislative powers, as well as investigations and other
action by the European Commission.
Electricity Regulation
The regulatory framework for the Italian electricity sector has
changed significantly in recent years pursuant to the
implementation through the Bersani Decree of the December 1996
EU Electricity Directive.
The Bersani Decree, which entered into force on April 1,1999, began the liberalization of the electricity sector through
the separation of generation, transmission and distribution
activities and the gradual introduction of free competition in
power generation and sales to consumers meeting certain
consumption thresholds, while maintaining a regulated monopoly
structure for power transmission, distribution and sales to
other, Non-Eligible Customers. In particular, the Bersani
Decree, among other things,
•
liberalized, as of April 1, 1999, the generation, import
and export of electricity;
•
provided that consumers, or Eligible Customers, meeting certain
consumption thresholds, which have been progressively reduced,
may negotiate supply agreements directly with any domestic or
foreign producer, wholesaler or distributor of electricity,
while other, “Non-Eligible Customers” must continue to
purchase electricity from the distributor serving the area in
which they are located and pay regulated prices determined by
the Energy Authority;
58
•
provided that after January 1, 2003, no electricity company
may produce or import more than 50% of the total of imported and
domestically produced electricity in Italy, which limit resulted
in our sale of the Gencos;
•
provided for the establishment of the Single Buyer, a central
purchaser of electricity from producers on behalf of all
Non-Eligible Customers;
•
provided for the creation of the Italian power exchange, a
virtual marketplace in which producers, importers, wholesalers,
the Gestore della Rete, other Eligible Customers and the Single
Buyer buy and sell electricity at prices determined through a
competitive bidding process;
•
provided for the creation of a Market Operator to manage the
Italian power exchange;
•
provided for the separation of management and operation of the
national electricity transmission grid, which was to be licensed
to an independent transmission system operator, the Gestore
della Rete, from ownership of the grid assets, which were
retained by existing owners, primarily Terna; and
•
established a new licensing regime for electricity distribution
and provided incentives for the consolidation of electricity
distribution networks within each municipality.
The Bersani Decree was amended following the enactment of a law
in October 2003 that provided, among other things, for the
reunification of management and operation of the national
transmission grid with its ownership under a single private
entity. An implementing decree enacted in May 2004 provides for
the transfer from the Gestore della Rete to Terna of the
responsibility to manage the national transmission grid and the
related assets by October 31, 2005, although the Gestore
della Rete will still retain its other responsibilities.
Following this transfer, we will no longer control Terna, as no
electricity operator, including us, shall be entitled to voting
rights in excess of 5% with respect to the appointment of
Terna’s directors. In addition, we are legally required to
reduce our holding in Terna to no more than 20% by July 1,2007. In February 2005, Terna and the Gestore della Rete entered
into an agreement for the transfer to Terna of these management
activities. The transaction remains subject to the approval of
the Antitrust Authority. Please see
“— Business — Overview —
Transmission” for additional details on this transaction
and our plans to reduce our shareholding in Terna to
approximately 5%.
In 2003, the EU adopted a new directive and a related regulation
to further liberalize the electricity market. The new
Electricity Directive, which replaced the 1996 Electricity
Directive, enables all consumers to freely choose their supplier
by 2007, irrespective of consumption levels, with all
non-household consumers enjoying this right of choice from 2004.
Further, the new Electricity Directive introduces new
definitions of public service obligations and security of
supply, establishes a regulator in all EU member states with
well-defined functions, and, finally, requires legal unbundling
of network activities from generation and supply. The related EU
regulation establishes common rules for the cross-border trade
in electricity in the EU, laying down principles on charges to
be paid as a result of transit flows and access to networks as
well as on congestion management. EU member states were required
to implement the new directive by July 1, 2004, and Italy
did so partly through the Marzano Law, which is discussed below.
In 2005, the EU Commission announced its intention to open an
enquiry into the functioning of the EU’s energy markets.
On September 28, 2004, the Marzano Law (so named after the
then-Minister of Productive Activities, Antonio Marzano), a new
law aimed at reorganizing existing energy market regulation and
further liberalizing the natural gas and electricity markets,
took effect. Among other things, the Marzano Law aims to clarify
the respective roles of the Italian central government, regional
and local authorities, and the Energy Authority. The Marzano Law
also seeks to facilitate investments in the energy sector. To
further liberalize the market, and consistent with the new
Electricity Directive, the Marzano Law provides that all
customers will be eligible to purchase electricity on the free
market from July 1, 2007, although the law provides that
the Single Buyer will nonetheless continue to supply electricity
to consumers who choose not to leave the regulated market.
The Marzano Law also authorizes the Italian government to limit
the ability of companies based in other EU member states to
invest in the Italian energy sector if their home country does
not adequately guarantee a reciprocal ability for Italian
companies to invest in its energy market. The Italian government
had already approved such a measure in 2001, which served to
limit the ability of EDF to exercise its voting rights with
respect to the stake it currently holds in Italenergia Bis
S.p.A., the controlling shareholder of Edison.
59
However, the European Commission has initiated a proceeding
before the European Court of Justice seeking a declaration that
the 2001 limitation is contrary to EU law. On May 6, 2005,
the Italian government passed a decree suspending this
limitation.
In November 2004, the Italian region of Tuscany challenged
before the Constitutional Court certain provisions of the
Marzano Law regarding the allocation of powers between the
Italian state and regions in connection with the regulation of
electricity and gas distribution, including concessions. Please
see “Item 3. Key Information — Risk
Factors — Risks Relating to Our Energy
Business — We are dependent on government concessions
for certain of our electricity and gas distribution
businesses.”
Eligible and Non-Eligible Customers
One of the most important features of the regulatory framework
is the distinction between Eligible Customers and Non-Eligible
Customers. All customers that do not qualify as Eligible
Customers are considered Non-Eligible Customers.
Eligible Customers may enter into bilateral contracts for the
supply of energy at freely negotiated prices directly with any
domestic or foreign producer or reseller, or, since
January 1, 2005, buy electricity directly on the power
exchange. Resellers, including our subsidiaries Enel Energia and
Enel Trade, may buy electricity for resale to Eligible Customers
from any producer or on the power exchange.
Non-Eligible Customers may purchase electricity only from the
distribution company serving the geographic area in which they
are located, at tariffs set by the Energy Authority.
Distributors who transport electricity to the regulated market
must in turn purchase the electricity so distributed from the
Single Buyer, also at purchase prices fixed by the Energy
Authority. Please see “— The Tariff
Structure” for additional information on the electricity
tariff system in Italy.
The consumption threshold for qualification as an Eligible
Customer, which is set by regulation, is decreasing over time,
reducing the number of customers who must buy electricity on the
regulated market. The consumption threshold in January 2002 was
9 GWh or more of electricity per year, declining on May 1,2003, to 0.1 GWh per year, which resulted in approximately 60%
of our electricity customers becoming eligible to participate in
the free market.
In accordance with the 2003 new Electricity Directive, the
Energy Authority on June 30, 2004, recognized all
non-residential customers, or approximately 7 million
consumers, as Eligible Customers as of July 1, 2004,
permitting them to take part in the free market from that date
if they so choose. From July 1, 2007, all customers,
including residential customers, will be eligible to purchase
electricity on the free market.
Eligible Customers who choose not to participate on the free
market will continue to purchase electricity from their local
distributor on the regulated market under conditions set by the
Energy Authority. The law also provides that even after all
customers have become Eligible Customers, the Single Buyer will
continue to supply electricity to distributors for resale to
their customers who choose not to leave the regulated market.
The Single Buyer
The Single Buyer, a corporation formed in 1999 and wholly owned
by the Gestore della Rete, is responsible for ensuring the
efficient, adequate and non-discriminatory supply of electricity
to Non-Eligible Customers until they are allowed to freely
choose their supplier. The Single Buyer became operational on
January 1, 2004. Electricity distribution companies,
including us, may take stakes of up to 10% in the Single Buyer,
although the Gestore della Rete must remain the majority
shareholder. The Single Buyer will remain under the control of
the Gestore della Rete following the transfer to Terna of
management of the national transmission grid.
Based on its own periodic estimates of future electricity demand
and Ministry of Productive Activities guidelines, starting from
April 1, 2004, the Single Buyer purchases all electricity
for the regulated market from us and other domestic as well as
foreign producers. All distribution companies, including ours,
are required to purchase electricity to be distributed on the
regulated market from the Single Buyer.
60
The Single Buyer may purchase electricity on the power exchange,
through bilateral contracts (including “contracts for
differences,” as described below) with domestic and foreign
producers, or from the Gestore della Rete, which resells the
electricity it is required to purchase under the CIP 6 regime.
The Single Buyer held an auction in March 2004 for contracts for
the physical delivery of a total of 4,800 MW of electricity
to be supplied to customers on the regulated market for the
period from April 1, 2004, through December 31, 2004.
Producers bid for these contracts on the basis of percentage
discounts from a base price. Under these contracts, winning
bidders were awarded their discounted bid price, plus a fixed
component aimed at covering the cost of fuel. In these auctions,
we were awarded physical delivery contracts for approximately
3,620 MW of electricity purchased by the Single Buyer (or
approximately 75% of the total amount awarded).
In 2004 and 2005, the Single Buyer also held a series of
auctions for “contracts for differences,” which are
financial derivative contracts used to hedge the price risk of
operations on the power exchange. These contracts establish a
reference price, or “strike” price for a specified
quantity of electricity, which the Single Buyer then purchases
on the power exchange at the market price. In 2004, these
contracts were “two-way”contracts for differences:
When the market price paid by Single Buyer was higher than the
strike price, the counterparty would pay the Single Buyer an
amount equal to the difference, while when the market price was
lower than the strike price, the Single Buyer would pay the
counterparty the difference. In 2005, Single Buyer has offered
only “one-way”contracts, under which the counterparty
still pays the Single Buyer any excess of the market price for
its electricity purchases over the strike price, while the
Single Buyer instead pays the counterparty a contractually set
premium.
For the year 2004, we were awarded contracts for differences
with the Single Buyer covering approximately 28 TWh (equal to
approximately 70% of the total amount awarded). For the year
2005, the Single Buyer held auctions for contracts for
differences in December 2004 and January 2005 with respect to a
total of approximately 19,500 MW of electricity; we won
approximately 12,500 MW of the final amount awarded.
The total payments by the Single Buyer to electricity producers
for its purchases of electricity, either through bilateral
contracts or on the power exchange, plus its own operating
costs, must equal the total revenues it earns from sales to the
regulated market under the regulated tariff structure. As a
consequence, the Energy Authority may adjust tariffs from time
to time to reflect the prices actually paid by the Single Buyer,
as well as other factors.
The Italian Power Exchange
The Italian power exchange, a virtual marketplace for the spot
trading of electricity by producers and consumers under the
management of the Market Operator, started operations on
April 1, 2004.
In the initial phase of the power exchange, from April 1,2004, through December 31, 2004, the Gestore della Rete,
based on its own estimates of aggregate electricity demand,
placed bids on the power exchange on behalf of all consumers who
had not fully satisfied their demand through bilateral
contracts. Since January 1, 2005, Eligible Customers have
been able to participate directly in bidding for electricity on
the power exchange.
The power exchange is organized into three different markets in
order to ensure a steady supply of electricity — the
“day-ahead” market, the “adjustment market”
and the “ancillary service” market.
In the day-ahead market, sellers and buyers submit bids and
offers for electricity to be supplied on the day following the
transaction under the supervision of the Market Operator. The
Market Operator is responsible for matching electricity demand
and supply and, consequently, for the definition of power
injection (supply) and withdrawal
(demand) schedules and for communicating these schedules to
the transmission system operator, currently the Gestore della
Rete, which is responsible for physical delivery of energy.
Variations in the schedules agreed upon in the
“day-ahead” market are negotiated through an
“adjustment market.” In the “day-ahead”
market and in the “adjustment market,” a
market-clearing price (the “system marginal price”) at
which all transactions must take place is set by the Market
Operator on the basis of an aggregation of all bids and offers,
starting, respectively, from the highest bid and the lowest
offer. In addition, the Market Operator must also take into
account physical network limitations which place
61
constraints on the transport power from particular generation
facilities to consumers and may result in market congestion.
If there is no market congestion, the Market Operator is able to
set one system marginal price throughout Italy. However, if
market congestion occurs, the Market Operator may divide the
market into various zones, in which different system marginal
prices may be set. In such event, the Market Operator will still
determine one national price for purchasers on the power
exchange, called the “unified national price,” based
on a weighted average of the different system marginal prices
set in the various zones. Suppliers, however, will receive the
system marginal price that is applicable in their zone. In order
to ensure that all producers in a congested zone bear the costs
associated with the congestion, the Gestore della Rete will
impose on suppliers who have produced electricity under
bilateral contracts within a zone a congestion fee equal to the
price differential between the applicable system marginal price
in that producer’s zone and the unified national price.
In the ancillary service market, producers submit to the Gestore
della Rete bids and offers to increase (or decrease) the volume
of energy to be supplied (or withdrawn) in order to permit the
real-time balancing of supply and demand required for the
physical delivery of electricity. The Gestore della Rete also
procures reserve production capacity through the ancillary
service market by accepting bids from producers willing to
guarantee availability of reserve power. Transactions on the
ancillary service market also serve to help manage network
congestion that results when physical delivery schedules agreed
upon in the day-ahead and adjustment markets are incompatible
with network constraints. In the ancillary service market,
prices are determined on the basis of individual negotiations
between producers and Gestore della Rete, or on a
“pay-as-bid” basis.
The Energy Authority and the Antitrust Authority constantly
monitor the power exchange to ensure that it delivers the
expected results: improved competition between electricity
producers and enhancement of the efficiency of the Italian
electricity system. According to the Market Operator, the
performance of the power exchange has been satisfactory so far,
although price volatility remains high.
However, in February 2005, the Energy Authority and Antitrust
Authority issued a joint report on the state of the
liberalization process of the Italian electricity sector in
which, among other things, we were found to be in a position to
set wholesale electricity prices throughout Italy, except in
Sardinia (where Endesa holds a similar power). As a consequence,
on May 5, 2005, the Energy Authority proposed certain
possible measures to further promote competition in the
wholesale electricity market over the next few years. The
proposals include measures to reduce the structural power of
operators in the market and disincentives to electricity
producers to seek to exercise market power, in particular with
respect to prices. Among the structural measures proposed are
the required sale by us of additional power plants (on top of
the 15,000 MW of productive capacity we have already sold
through the disposal of the Gencos), or the required lease by us
to third parties of generating capacity, as well as the partial
entrusting to the Gestore della Rete of the management of
certain power plants deemed essential to cover demand for
electricity, and hence whose production is a significant
determinant of the wholesale price of electricity. The proposed
disincentives to the exercise of market power include certain
price cap mechanisms and the imposition of a requirement that
producers enter into two-way contracts for differences or
“Virtual Power Plant”contracts (“VPP”), in
either case at predetermined quantities and at regulated prices.
VPPs are contracts similar to contracts for differences that
give the buyer the right, when the market price is higher than
the contract price, to request from the seller an amount equal
to the difference between the market and contract prices. The
proposals are subject to public comment through June 10,2005.
In addition, the Energy Authority in April 2005 officially
concluded that two cases of price spikes on the power exchange,
one in June 2004 and one in January 2005, may not have been the
result of underlying market conditions, and instead may have
been caused by violations of antitrust law by us. As a result,
the Antitrust Authority opened an investigation into these
alleged violations and the surrounding events, which is due to
be completed by March 31, 2006. For more information,
please see “Item 3. Key Information — Risk
Factors — Risks Relating to Our Energy
Business — We have been and are subject to abuse of
dominant position, market abuse and other regulatory
investigations and “Item 8. Financial
Information — Other Financial Information —
Legal Proceedings.”
62
Imports
The volume of electricity that can be imported into Italy is
limited by the capacity of transmission lines that connect the
Italian grid with those of other countries and by concerns
relating to the security of the system. Currently, a maximum
import capacity of approximately 7,250 MW is available to
import energy safely. A law passed in 2003 provides incentives
to the development of new transmission infrastructures.
In 2004, we controlled approximately 2,055 MW of the total
import capacity pursuant to long-term supply contracts. Since
April 1, 2004, the date on which the power exchange started
operations, we have been required to sell the electricity
imported pursuant to these contracts to the Single Buyer by the
terms of a Ministerial Decree issued in December 2003.
The Bersani Decree authorized the Ministry of Productive
Activities to set terms and conditions to allocate the
interconnection capacity available after deducting the capacity
used by existing long-term contracts, taking into account a fair
allocation of the generally less expensive imported electricity
between the free and regulated markets if import demand exceeds
total interconnection capacity.
The allocation mechanism for 2004 set out by the Ministry of
Productive Activities in accordance with EU law and applied by
the Energy Authority and the Gestore della Rete considered the
total interconnection capacity available at the borders with
France and Switzerland (the north-west pool) and Austria and
Slovenia (the north-east pool) separately. Interconnection
capacity was allocated on a pro-rata basis; in addition, in no
case may a single importer hold more than 10% of the
interconnection capacity available in any given pool. The
Ministry of Productive Activities put a new allocation mechanism
into effect for 2005. Under the new mechanism, capacity is
allocated pursuant to an implicit auction mechanism, with the
price to be paid for access to this capacity determined based on
the price in the power exchange’s “day-ahead
market” (please see “— The Italian Power
Exchange,” above). Because of the link to prices on the
power exchange, this mechanism may result in higher price
volatility for, and an increase in the cost of, imported
electricity. As a result, the Energy Authority has also
established a mechanism to provide purchasers of imported
electricity with a hedge, intended to cover a portion of this
price risk, at no additional cost. The hedge, the amount of
which is subject to a fixed cap, is awarded by the Gestore della
Rete on a pro-rata basis in the event applications exceed the
total available quantity.
Incentives to Provide Generation Capacity
In order to address a current deficit in Italian generation
capacity relative to rising electricity demand, the regulatory
framework provides incentives to power generators both to build
new capacity as well as to maintain their existing plants in
good working order and available to cover sudden variations in
electricity demand.
In 2004, the Energy Authority established a provisional system
of payments to remunerate producers that make generation
capacity available to the electricity system at times of peak
demand, known as “capacity payments.” Capacity
payments to a given producer comprise both an amount due for
capacity available on “critical” days (set by the
Gestore della Rete) and a further amount payable when pool
market prices fall below specified thresholds, as an extra
incentive. The provisional system is expected to remain in place
until the end of 2005. The Energy Authority is currently
developing the definitive mechanism, which by law must be
market-based and also provide incentives for new generation
capacity.
New Generation Plants
In order to promote investment in new generation facilities, the
October 2003 law amending the Bersani Decree included provisions
to streamline the authorization procedures relating to the
construction of new power generation plants and the renovation
and expansion of existing plants.
The Marzano Law requires all entities receiving authorization to
construct new plants or to increase generating capacity of
existing power plants after September 28, 2004, to pay the
authorities of the region in which the plant is located
compensation (based on generating capacity) for the lost
alternative use of the plant site and the impact thereof on
surrounding communities, unless the parties agree otherwise.
63
Transmission
As noted, we use the term “transmission” to refer to
the transport of electricity on high and very high voltage
interconnected networks from the plants where it is generated
or, in the case of imported energy, from the points of
acquisition, to distribution systems. The national electricity
transmission grid includes all of Terna’s very high voltage
(380/220 kV) and high voltage (150/132 kV) lines.
A law passed in 2003 requires the reunification of ownership and
management of the grid, currently held by Terna and the Gestore
della Rete, respectively. Terna and the Gestore della Rete
entered into an agreement in February 2005 for the transfer to
Terna of the Gestore della Rete’s grid management
activities. Closing of the transaction is subject to the
approval of the Antitrust Authority. Please see
“— Business — Overview —
Transmission” for additional information.
Distribution of Electricity
As noted, we use the term “distribution” to refer to
the transport of electricity from the transmission grid to end
users of electricity.
Distribution companies in Italy are required to be licensed by
the state and to provide service to all customers who request
it, subject to payment of applicable tariffs and to compliance
with technical and safety requirements. In addition,
distributors serving more than 300,000 customers must distribute
electricity to the regulated market through separate companies
having distribution as their sole activity.
Our concessions for the distribution of electricity are
scheduled to expire in 2032.
The Bersani Decree sought to promote the consolidation of the
Italian electricity distribution industry by providing for the
issuance of only one distribution license within each
municipality and establishing procedures to consolidate
distribution activities under a single operator in
municipalities where both we and a local distribution company
were engaged in electricity distribution by giving municipal
networks the right to request that we sell our distribution
network in their municipalities to them.
Substantially all of the qualifying distribution companies in
municipalities with co-existing networks made requests to
purchase our networks in those cities. For more details on the
consolidation process, please see
“— Business — The Enel
Group — Sales, Infrastructure and Networks —
Consolidation of the electricity distribution network.”
On average, the distribution networks that we have been required
to sell were more profitable than our other distribution
networks, mainly because distribution in metropolitan areas has
lower costs. In 2004, the Energy Authority put in place an
equalization system to compensate distributors for the higher
costs associated with serving non-urban areas. Please see
“— The Tariff Structure.”
The Tariff Structure
Prices paid by all Italian customers for electricity include a
transmission component, a distribution component, a generation
component covering the price of the electricity itself and
system charges.
Under the current electricity tariff regime, all customers pay
regulated prices, set either directly by the Energy Authority or
in accordance with Energy Authority guidelines and subject to
its approval, for the transmission and distribution components
and system charges. The transmission and distribution
components, together referred to as “transport
charges,” are subject to a price cap mechanism aimed at
progressively reducing these charges on the basis of annual
efficiency targets. For customers purchasing electricity on the
regulated market, the Energy Authority also regulates the
generation component, which is set on a quarterly basis, while
customers purchasing electricity on the free market pay prices
agreed through bilateral contracts or on the power exchange.
The Energy Authority sets base tariff levels every four years.
In setting the base tariff levels, the Energy Authority takes
into account:
•
Operating costs of generation (for electricity prices on the
regulated market), transmission and distribution activities,
including procurement costs, and amortization and depreciation.
In order for
64
operators to be able to recover particular costs, the costs must
be both actually incurred by them and recognized by the Energy
Authority;
•
An appropriate return on invested capital, including both equity
and debt financing; and
•
The costs associated with system charges.
In 2004, the Energy Authority set new base tariffs for the
2004-2007 period, which have been in force since
February 1, 2004. The Energy Authority has estimated that
the new tariff regime in place for 2004-2007 will result in a
reduction of the overall tariff paid by regulated market
customers of approximately 13% in real terms (assuming no change
in fuel costs and system charges) during the period.
The actual impact of tariff levels on our revenues depends on a
number of factors, including the volume of electricity we sell
in the regulated market, the fuel costs incurred and the mix of
customers we serve.
The tariff structure currently in place also includes certain
mechanisms to take into account structural factors affecting
distributors’ costs.
The Energy Authority in 2004 established a price equalizing
mechanism intended to minimize the effects of a timing
discrepancy in the setting of prices distributors pay to the
Single Buyer for electricity to be distributed on the regulated
market and the prices that distributors may charge to end users
on the regulated market. The prices distributors pay to the
Single Buyer for electricity to be distributed on the regulated
market are set monthly by the Energy Authority based on the
average unit costs incurred by the Single Buyer in connection
with its purchases of electricity. However, the generation
component included in the overall tariff that distributors may
charge to end users on the regulated market is fixed by the
Energy Authority on a quarterly basis, as explained in more
detail below. In order to minimize the effects of this
discrepancy, the Energy Authority has established a price
equalizing mechanism applicable for the first time in 2004. The
equalizing mechanism will be funded through a system charge in
an amount set by the Energy Authority, applicable starting in
2005.
In 2004, the Energy Authority also put in place a system to
compensate distributors that serve areas where costs are
significantly higher than the national average due to
uncontrollable factors such as population density and geography.
The costs to be taken into account in setting this compensation
are to be based on infrastructural elements such as length of
cables and installation type (aerial or underground), but have
not yet been fixed. The Energy Authority is currently in the
process of determining which distributors are to be compensated
under this system, and the amount of each such
distributor’s compensation.
The Energy Authority currently defines the following six tariff
categories of electricity consumer:
The Energy Authority has been seeking to introduce a new tariff
system designed to protect disadvantaged residential customers.
However, this system has not yet been formally proposed or
approved.
Generation Component of Electricity Tariffs
The generation component refers to the price paid by customers
for electricity sold on the regulated market. Prior to the start
of the power exchange on April 1, 2004, the Energy
Authority determined generation costs based on fixed and
variable components of production costs. The fixed-cost
component, which was intended to reflect non-fuel operating
costs, was based on an estimate of the average recognized fixed
costs associated with generation plants in Italy and was set on
annual basis.
65
The variable-cost component of the tariffs was principally
intended to reflect fuel costs associated with thermal power
generation. This system resulted in an increase in the relative
profitability of:
•
Hydroelectric or geothermal generation, since these plants do
not incur fuel costs; and
•
The resale of electricity imported under long-term contracts in
effect as of the date of the entry into force of the first
Electricity Directive on February 19, 1997, which was
frequently cheaper than electricity generated in Italy.
The Energy Authority decided to reduce this potential windfall
profit for hydroelectric or geothermal producers by establishing
a new surcharge to be paid by these producers to the Gestore
della Rete with respect to electricity sold by them. This
surcharge applied until December 2001. Pursuant to rules on
stranded costs enacted in 2002 (which are described in more
detail below), the surcharge on hydroelectric and geothermal
generation was abolished as of January 1, 2002.
In February 2004, the Energy Authority modified the price
electricity producers were permitted to charge to distributors
for the electricity to be supplied to regulated customers in
order to reduce the component of electricity tariffs related to
generation for the period from March through May 2004. We and
other electricity operators challenged this reduction before the
Administrative Tribunal of Lombardy, which annulled the Energy
Authority decision. The Energy Authority in December 2004
appealed this ruling; a hearing date has yet to be set.
Since April 1, 2004, the Energy Authority sets the
generation cost component of the electricity tariff paid by
customers on the regulated market every three months on the
basis of the average costs incurred by the Single Buyer for the
procurement of electricity, both on the power exchange and
directly from producers.
We sell electricity on the free market through bilateral
contracts at prices that are negotiated with each customer and
that may vary based on several elements, such as quantity
purchased, type of electricity sold and duration of the
contract; electricity sold on the power exchange is sold at the
price determined through the relevant market mechanism. Please
see “— The Italian Power Exchange” above for
additional details on these mechanisms.
Transmission and Distribution Components
As noted above, the regulated tariff for transmission and
distribution services, or transport charges, for all customers
takes into account both the operating costs of transmission and
distribution activities, including procurement costs, and
amortization and depreciation, as well as an appropriate return
on invested capital. In order for operators to be able to
recover particular costs, the costs must be both actually
incurred by them and recognized by the Energy Authority. The
transmission component of the transport charges is currently set
by the Energy Authority. As explained in more detail below,
distributors may propose various price options for both
residential and non-residential customers, within guidelines set
by, and subject to the approval of, the Energy Authority.
The costs of transmission and distribution companies used in
determining transport charges are subject to a price-cap
mechanism. During the 2000-2003 period, the Energy Authority set
the annual rate of reduction with respect to total costs
(capital costs, depreciation and operating costs) in real terms
at 4% for each of the transmission and distribution components.
For the period 2004-2007, the Energy Authority has set the
annual percentage decrease only for operating costs and
depreciation, but excluding capital costs, for transmission and
distribution services at 2.5% and 3.5%, respectively.
For distributors, the determination of operating costs is
required to reflect the average costs incurred by the main
distributors for the transport of electricity through the local
distribution networks and for the sales-related services they
provide to final customers, plus a specified return on invested
capital. The return on capital recognized by the Energy
Authority for the 2004-2007 period was set at 6.8% for
distribution networks and at 6.7% for transmission networks, or
a higher percentage for capital invested in transmission network
development.
Depreciation and invested capital are calculated by the Energy
Authority under criteria consistent with international
regulatory practices. In setting tariff levels for the 2004-2007
period, the Energy Authority revised the way depreciation costs
are calculated for transmission and distribution companies;
whereas in the
66
2000-2003 period, the depreciation costs recognized were based
on the value of a company’s network assets and the related
depreciation expenses as recorded in companies’ statutory
accounts, these costs are now calculated based on the historical
cost of infrastructure, as revalued annually. The useful lives
of assets considered by the Energy Authority to determine
depreciation expenses to be recognized through the transport
charges have also been increased to bring them into line with
the expected useful life of plant and equipment.
Prior to 2004, both the transmission and distribution component
of the transport charges paid by non-residential customers to
distributors were set on the basis of proposals made by each
distributor and approved by the Energy Authority. During that
period, the transport charges for residential customers were set
directly by the Energy Authority as part of the tariff paid by
them to distributors.
Starting in 2004, the Energy Authority has directly set the
transmission component of the transport charge for all
customers, while distributors retain the ability to propose to
non-residential customers one or more options for the
distribution component of the transport charge, based on the
distributors’ costs as described above and within limits
set by the Energy Authority.
These limits are of two types. One limit sets an aggregate
maximum amount of tariff revenues that each distributor will be
allowed to receive from all customers belonging to the same
category in a single year. A second limit sets the maximum
amount of tariff revenues that any distributor will be allowed
to receive from a single customer in a given category. If the
aggregate limit is exceeded, the distributor must compensate
customers for the amount of the excess. The Energy Authority
monitors compliance with the individual limit at the time the
distributor submits its price options for approval. In addition,
distributors must comply with a trade policy code aimed at
ensuring transparency.
Residential customers do not have any options for the
distribution component per se, since the tariff they pay
includes the generation component and transport charges without
distinguishing between the two. However, distributors may now
also offer regulated market customers different tariff options,
subject to approval by the Energy Authority. Please see
“Item 4. Information on the Company —
Business — The Enel Group — Sales,
Infrastructure and Networks — Telemanagement
System” for information regarding our tariff options.
System Charges and Other Charges
The tariff structure also addresses the need to cover various
costs resulting from public policy-related requirements imposed
on the Italian electricity industry by providing for the
following charges, payable by all electricity consumers:
•
Charges concerning the electricity system, established by the
Ministry of Productive Activities, that consist of:
•
a nuclear surcharge, covering part of the costs incurred by
So.g.i.n., the company to which we transferred our discontinued
nuclear operations, in connection with the dismantling of
nuclear plants and decommissioning of nuclear fuels; this
surcharge is designed to cover substantially all of such costs
when added to the funds that we transferred to So.g.i.n.;
•
a surcharge that benefits producers from renewable resources;
•
special surcharges covering the cost of supplying electricity at
mandated discounts to certain customers (primarily the Italian
state-owned railway company and Acciai Speciali Terni S.p.A.,
both of which transferred electricity assets to us as part of
the nationalization of the Italian electricity industry in 1962);
•
research and development surcharges, covering related
costs; and
•
certain stranded costs that have not yet been recovered. Please
see “— Stranded Costs” for a discussion of
these costs.
•
Other general interest charges established by the Energy
Authority to adjust or refine the operation of the tariff
mechanism, which include adjustments to cover potential
differences between distributors’ costs as recognized under
the current tariff structure and actual tariff revenues.
•
Incentives for the enhancement of the quality of service.
67
•
Charges recovered through upward adjustments to the price caps,
as established by the Energy Authority, which cover:
•
costs deriving from unforeseeable events, changes in the
regulatory framework or new obligations for universal service;
•
costs deriving from demand-side management initiatives intended
to promote a more efficient use of resources by electricity
customers, including information campaigns; and
•
additional recognized costs incurred in connection with the
offer of value-added services on top of basic options.
Revenues deriving from system charges are remitted to and
managed by the Cassa Conguaglio per il Settore Elettrico,
or the Equalization Fund, a public entity charged with
redistributing these revenues to the electricity companies
entitled to receive them.
Stranded Costs
Stranded costs are current costs deriving from contractual
commitments or investment decisions that electricity companies:
•
undertook for reasons of public policy;
•
undertook at a time when the electricity markets were not yet
open to competition; and
•
could have been recovered in a monopoly regime but cannot be
recovered under a regime of competitive electricity pricing.
To facilitate the transition to open electricity markets, the
European Commission has stated that electricity companies should
be refunded their stranded costs provided that:
•
they minimize the impact of those costs (and, hence, the amount
of the refund) on their future operations; and
•
they submit an industrial plan demonstrating the long-term
profitability of the activity related to the stranded costs.
A law enacted in April 2003 limited the amount of stranded costs
we are entitled to recover for periods through 2003 to
(i) certain costs relating to our generation plants
incurred to comply with requirements that were imposed in the
past concerning their design and operation (for example, because
of governmental policies, we built most of our plants to ensure
a high degree of flexibility in the types of fuel that they can
use), and (ii) costs arising from our inability to fulfill
our Nigerian LNG contract because of the Italian
government’s failure to allow construction of a required
regasification terminal. The April 2003 law provides that for
periods after January 1, 2004, we will be limited to
recovering only those stranded costs associated with the
Nigerian LNG contract.
In August 2004, the MEF and the Ministry of Productive
Activities issued a joint decree that determined the overall
amount of stranded costs we are entitled to recover. On
December 1, 2004, following the European Commission’s
approval of the decree pursuant to the state aid rules of the
European Union, we became entitled to recover approximately
€513 million
on account of stranded costs related to our generation plants
for the period 2000-2003. The amount of stranded costs related
to the Nigerian LNG contract we are entitled to recover was
determined to be approximately
€555 million
in respect of the 2000-2003 period and approximately
€910 million
in respect of the 2004-2009 period. Although we have not
actually received these funds, in 2004 we recorded related
revenues of
€1,219 million,
the amount we became entitled to receive in respect of 2004 and
prior years under the August 2004 decree. The timing and manner
in which these amounts are to be paid to us will be established
in a future decree, which is currently under consideration by
the Italian government. This future decree will also be
submitted to the European Commission.
Continuity and Quality of Service Regulation
Since July 1, 2000, the Energy Authority has issued
guidelines setting targets for electricity service continuity
and quality. Continuity of service is measured by the frequency
and total duration in minutes of service interruptions and is
assessed with reference to annual targets set by the Energy
Authority. Quality of
68
service is measured in terms of waiting time for the performance
of the most frequent commercial activities (such as connection
cost estimates, connections, disconnections and reconnections).
The Energy Authority has instituted an incentive system whereby
it grants bonuses to companies that exceed its targets for
continuity of service and imposes penalties on companies that
fail to meet them. We have consistently exceeded our continuity
of service targets since 2000. Distributors that outperform the
targets are paid their bonuses through a component of the tariff
structure. In 2004, we received a
€205 million
bonus for having outperformed the continuity of service targets
in 2003. We expect to receive at least
€45 million
in bonus payments with respect to our continuity of service
performance in 2004.
With respect to quality of service, if a distribution company
fails to meet standards set by the Energy Authority in providing
a particular service to a customer, the company is required to
reimburse that customer an amount that is fixed by the Energy
Authority. We have achieved most of the quality of service
targets set by the Energy Authority, and have not been required
to make material reimbursements.
In May 2005, the Energy Authority issued a consultation
document, subject to public comment through June 30, 2005,
proposing to institute a system of automatic compensation
payable by electricity distributors to affected customers in the
event of a blackout of other prolonged service interruption.
Under these proposals, compensation would be payable by a
distributor that fails to restore service within eight hours of
the start of such an interruption not caused by damage to the
distributor’s facilities, or within 24 hours when
damage to the distributor’s facilities is involved. The
Energy Authority’s proposals also provide for incentive
mechanisms for distributors to restore service as soon as
possible in the event of a widespread and prolonged service
interruption.
We believe that the level of revenues expected under the current
tariff structure will allow us and other distributors to cover
the costs we need to incur to meet the continuity and quality of
service targets set by the Energy Authority. See also
“— Business — The Enel
Group — Sales, Infrastructure and Networks —
Quality of network service.”
Promotion of Renewable Resources
In 1992, the Comitato Interministeriale Prezzi, an
Italian governmental committee, issued Regulation 6/92
(“CIP 6”), which established incentives for new
generation plants using renewable resources and for the sale of
electricity produced from renewable resources. Initially under
the CIP 6 regime, we had been required to purchase substantially
all of the qualifying domestic production of electricity from
renewable resources at fixed prices. In November 2000, the
Ministry of Productive Activities issued a decree that
transferred all energy produced from renewable resources under
the CIP 6 regime to the Gestore della Rete as of January 1,2001. Under current regulations, the Gestore della Rete is
required to purchase all CIP 6 electricity, which it resells to
Eligible Customers and, starting from 2004, also to the Single
Buyer. The Single Buyer has a right to a predefined quota of CIP
6 electricity. Until 2003, Eligible Customers obtained CIP 6
electricity pursuant to an auction mechanism; starting from
2004, they are awarded CIP 6 electricity on a pro-rata basis.
The Gestore della Rete sells green certificates representing
electricity from renewable resources purchased from CIP 6
producers. In July 2004, the Energy Authority estimated that
total annual CIP 6 electricity production in 2004 would be equal
to approximately 50 TWh, in line with the amount produced in
2003.
The Bersani Decree provided that, starting in 2001, all
companies introducing more than 100 GWh of electricity generated
from conventional sources into the national transmission grid in
any year must, in the following year, introduce into the
national transmission grid an amount of electricity produced
from newly qualified renewable resources equal to at least 2% of
the amount of such excess over 100 GWh, net of co-generation,
self-consumption and exports. Electricity from renewable
resources may be produced directly or purchased from other
producers who have obtained tradable “green
certificates” representing a fixed amount of electricity
certified as generated from renewable resources.
In addition, the Bersani Decree directs the transmission system
operator, currently the Gestore della Rete, to dispatch
electricity into the national transmission grid so that energy
produced from qualified renewable resources takes priority over
other types of electricity.
69
An EU directive issued in September 2001 set targets for energy
production from renewable resources, requiring that by 2010 a
share equal to 22% of total electricity consumed in the EU be
generated from renewable resources and providing recommended
national targets to achieve this goal. Italy adopted legislation
to implement this directive in December 2003, setting a 22.5%
target for total production of electricity from renewable
resources by 2010, lower than the 25% target for Italy
recommended in the EU directive. December 2003 legislation
amending the Bersani Decree provided for a progressive increase
in the 2% share of electricity produced from newly qualified
renewable resources electricity generators are required to
introduce into the national transmission grid. For 2004, the
percentage was increased to 2.35%, and this level will increase
by a further 0.35 percentage points in each of 2005 and
2006. Further increases may be implemented for the three-year
periods starting in 2007 and 2010.
Hydroelectric Power
Under the Bersani Decree, all of our licenses for the generation
of electricity from large bodies of water, which had originally
been granted to us for an indeterminate period of time, were
instead to expire in April 2029. In addition, the Bersani
Decree automatically extended to December 31, 2010, the
term of all hydroelectric licenses for the generation of
electricity from large bodies of water that were granted to
other electricity producers and were scheduled to expire before
such date. All hydroelectric licenses expiring after
December 31, 2010, were to retain their original expiration
date. The decree also provided that in any bidding contest, an
existing license holder would enjoy preferential treatment over
competitors in the case of equal bids.
In January 2004, the European Commission determined that certain
of the Italian regulations regarding hydroelectric concessions
were contrary to EU law. In particular, the European Commission
objected to the renewal preferences granted to existing holders
of concessions (and in the region of Trentino-Alto Adige, to the
operator controlled by the local authorities) upon the expiry of
those concessions, as well as to the fact that the regulations
provided for the expiration of all concessions in 2029 (and for
the region of Trentino-Alto Adige, in 2010), even though these
concessions had previously been of perpetual duration.
In 2005, the Italian parliament passed a law directing the
Italian government to amend by May 2006 the provisions of the
Bersani Decree that extended the duration of our hydroelectric
concessions, as well as those which accord to us and all other
current license holders preferential treatment in any bidding
contest. Please see “Item 3. Key
Information — Risk Factors — Risks Related
to Our Energy Business — A European Commission
challenge to Italian regulations on hydroelectric concessions
could adversely affect our business, financial condition and
results of operations.”
Taxes
Since January 1, 2001, consumers of electricity services
have been subject to three indirect taxes, the first two of
which are not applicable to residential customers whose
consumption is below certain specified thresholds, qualifying
them for a social protection scheme:
•
A state tax for residential uses (of
€0.0047/kWh) and
for other uses (of
€0.0031/kWh
excluding users with consumption over 1.2 GWh per month);
•
Additional local taxes that vary from
€0.0093/kWh up to
a maximum of
€0.0204/kWh; and
•
Value-added tax of 20% for all users with the exception of
residential and industrial customers (who are taxed at a rate of
10%).
Gas Regulation
Italian regulations enacted in May 2000 pursuant to EU Directive
98/30 (which mandated the general liberalization of natural gas
markets in the member states) seek to introduce competition into
the Italian natural gas market through the liberalization of the
import, export, transport, dispatching, distribution and sale of
gas.
70
Gas Eligible and Non-Eligible Customers
Until December 31, 2002, only certain large consumers,
known as Gas Eligible Customers, were able to freely choose
their supplier of natural gas. During the same period,
customers, mainly residential, who did not qualify as Gas
Eligible Customers, or Gas Non-Eligible Customers, were obliged
to purchase gas from distributors operating in their local area
at a tariff set by the Energy Authority. Since January 1,2003, all customers have had direct access to the natural gas
system and the right to freely choose their natural gas
supplier. However, natural gas suppliers and distributors are
still subject to regulation with respect to the tariffs they may
charge customers who were considered Gas Non-Eligible Customers
at that date. Please see “— Distribution tariffs
and sale tariffs for Gas Non-Eligible Customers” below.
Transport and storage
Companies engaged in the transport and dispatching of gas must
allow access to their gas transport networks to third parties,
provided that they have enough capacity and that giving such
access is economically and technically feasible. Transport fees
are established by the Energy Authority based on proposals from
the individual operators.
Operators of natural gas storage facilities must obtain a
concession from the Ministry of Productive Activities and are
required to provide storage services to third parties upon
request, provided that they have enough capacity and that giving
such storage services is economically and technically feasible.
In addition, importers are required to maintain storage reserves
equal to 10% of the gas they import from countries outside the
EU.
Distribution and Sale of Gas
The term distribution refers to the transport of gas through
local networks for delivery to customer premises. Since
January 1, 2002, gas distribution activities may be carried
out only by companies that are not otherwise engaged in the
natural gas industry, and gas sales to end users may be made
only by companies that are not otherwise engaged in the natural
gas industry except as importers, producers or wholesalers.
The Marzano Law also provides incentives for investment in new
natural gas pipelines and LNG regasification terminals by
exempting the investing entity from the obligation to provide
third-party access to not less than 80% of the capacity of the
new facilities for a period of not less than 20 years. We
expect these investment incentives eventually to lead to
increased competition in the gas distribution sector.
Restrictions on Sale and Imports of Gas
The sale of gas to end users is made under an authorization
granted by the Ministry of Productive Activities, which both
Enel Gas and Enel Trade have obtained. Enel Trade is also
authorized to import gas to be sold to power plants and
wholesalers. For each year from January 1, 2003, to
December 31, 2010, no single operator is allowed to hold a
market share higher than 50% of domestic sales to final
customers. In 2004, based on data provided by Anigas, the
Italian association of natural gas distribution companies, Enel
Gas had a market share in sales of natural gas to final
customers of approximately 11.6%. In addition, no single
operator is allowed to introduce imported or national gas into
the domestic transmission grid in a quantity exceeding a
specified percentage of the total, set at 75% in 2002 and
decreasing by two percentage points each year thereafter, to 61%
in 2010. The applicable percentage is calculated net of
quantities of gas consumed by the relevant operator or by its
controlled or affiliated companies.
Rules Governing Distribution of Gas
Under Italian regulations, distributors operate under
concessions awarded by local authorities pursuant to tender
procedures for periods not longer than 12 years. Through
service agreements, local authorities may regulate the terms and
conditions for the provision of the service and the quality
objectives to be achieved. The tenders are awarded based on
financial terms, quality and safety standards, investment plans
and technological and management skills offered. Distributors
are required to connect to the distribution network any customer
who so requests.
71
Prior to enactment of the Marzano Law, gas distribution
concessions awarded prior to May 2000 by means other than
competitive tender expired by law at the earlier of their
original expiration date or December 31, 2005, with the
expiration date extendible for up to five years under certain
conditions. The Marzano Law, as interpreted by the Ministry of
Productive Activities in November 2004, provided instead that
these concessions are to expire at the earlier of their original
expiration date or December 31, 2007, with the expiration
date still extendible for up to five years under certain
conditions. Under the same law, local authorities have the power
to extend the expiration date from December 31, 2007 to
December 31, 2008. However, certain local authorities do
not accept this revision of the expiration date, and have passed
measures that would terminate gas distribution concessions in
their jurisdictions on December 31, 2005. Please see
“Item 3. Key Information — Risk
Factors — Risks Relating to Our Energy
Business — We are dependent on government concessions
for our electricity and gas distribution businesses” and
“Item 8. Financial Information — Other Financial
Information — Legal Proceedings — Gas
concessions.”
Distribution Tariffs and Sales Tariffs for Gas Non-Eligible
Customers
In December 2000, pursuant to Italian regulations, the Energy
Authority identified tariff criteria that we and other gas
distributors and suppliers must apply in setting tariffs for the
distribution and the supply of gas to Gas Non-Eligible
Customers. The tariff criteria for both distribution and supply
include a fixed and a variable component reflecting the balance
between fixed and variable costs incurred by distributors and
suppliers, respectively, and operate to impose a cap on the
rates gas distributors and suppliers may charge. The portion of
the variable component in the sale tariff relating to the cost
of natural gas is revised on a quarterly basis.
For distributors, the tariff criteria generally take into
account average capital costs, as determined by the Energy
Authority based on a sample of selected operators. However,
since June 2002, the Energy Authority has permitted distributors
to set their rates based on actually incurred capital costs if
such costs can be adequately proven.
New distribution tariffs for the period October 2004-September
2008 have been issued by the Energy Authority. However, in
February 2005, the Administrative Tribunal of Lombardy annulled
the Energy Authority’s new tariffs. As a consequence,
pending action from the Energy Authority to revise the tariff
mechanism, the old tariffs remain applicable. In any event, we
do not expect any such revisions to have a material impact on
our gas business going forward and, should the new tariffs
require adjustments, we will be entitled to modify
customers’ bills accordingly.
From 2004, distributors are also bound by regulations concerning
quality of services. So far, the Energy Authority has introduced
penalties for distributors that do not comply with applicable
quality of service targets, and is also expected to introduce a
system of bonus payments for distributors who outperform these
targets.
For suppliers, prices charged to Gas Non-Eligible Customers were
supposed to be freely set from January 1, 2003. However, in
December 2002, the Energy Authority imposed a transitory regime
under which suppliers were obliged to continue to supply former
Gas Non-Eligible Customers using the tariff criteria established
by the Energy Authority and in effect at December 31, 2002,
if the Gas Non-Eligible Customers so requested. In December
2003, the Energy Authority established new tariff criteria
applicable as of January 1, 2004. By July 31, 2005,
the Energy Authority is expected to decide whether to allow
suppliers to freely set the prices charged to Gas Non-Eligible
Customers.
Environmental Matters
Our electricity and other operations are subject to extensive
environmental regulation, including laws adopted by the Italian
parliament or government to implement regulations and directives
adopted by the European Union and international agreements on
the environment.
The principal objective of our environmental policy is to comply
with all relevant legislation and to seek to reduce adverse
effects that our activities may have on the environment. Since
1996, we have taken the initiative of publishing an annual
environmental report. In 2002, we also started publishing a
sustainability report, which contains an environmental section.
We believe that environmental performance will represent an
increasingly important competitive factor in a liberalized
market.
72
Environmental regulations affecting our business primarily
relate to air emissions, water pollution, waste disposal, noise
and the clean up of contaminated sites. The principal air
emissions of fossil-fueled electricity generation that pollute
the atmosphere are sulfur dioxide (SO2), nitrogen
oxides (NOx), and particulate matter. A primary focus
of the environmental regulations applicable to our business is
an effort to reduce these emissions. We have also given
particular attention to seeking to minimize the impact of
electromagnetic fields and carbon dioxide (CO2) and
other greenhouse gas (“GHG”) emissions.
Electromagnetic Fields
The Italian government adopted regulations in 1992 and 1995
relating to exposure to electromagnetic fields applicable to low
frequency infrastructure, such as that used for the
transmission, distribution and consumption of electricity. These
regulations set two types of limits: maximum levels of exposure
to electromagnetic fields from new and existing transmission and
distribution lines and distribution substations, and minimum
distances between transmission or high-voltage distribution
lines or substations and residential buildings, office buildings
and similarly habited areas for lines built after the adoption
of the 1992 regulation. In 1998, the Italian government adopted
further regulations setting limits on exposure to
electromagnetic fields generated by high frequency
infrastructure, such as the transmission stations used to
provide mobile telephone services.
In February 2001, the Italian parliament passed a framework law
on electromagnetic field exposure amending these earlier
regulations. The 2001 law is intended to protect the general
public and workers against alleged potential long-term health
effects of exposure to electromagnetic fields generated by both
low frequency and high-frequency infrastructures. The law has
made it more difficult to install new transmission and
distribution lines and substations.
Furthermore, the 2001 law provides for the adoption and
implementation of programs to restructure electricity
transmission and distribution lines, substations and high
frequency infrastructures, in accordance with maximum exposure
levels. In 2003, two governmental decrees were enacted providing
for measures to implement the 2001 law and setting maximum
exposure levels, precaution levels and quality targets. However,
these measures have not yet taken effect, as they require action
from the Italian Authority for Environmental Protection that has
not yet been taken.
We believe that the costs of complying with these measures,
including costs for the related restructuring described above,
will not have a material impact on our results of operations.
In addition, the Bersani Decree required the Gestore della Rete
to pay Terna and other owners of transmission lines
consideration for the use of the lines which adequately reflects
the costs the owners incurred to comply with regulatory
requirements. Please see “Item 3. Key
Information — Risk Factors — Other Risks
Relating to Our Businesses — We may incur significant
capital expenditures to comply with legislation on
electromagnetic fields; we may not be fully reimbursed for these
capital expenditures” for a more detailed discussion of the
risks electromagnetic field-related regulation poses for our
business. Please see “Item 8. Financial
Information — Other Financial Information —
Legal Proceedings” for a discussion of certain legal
proceedings against us relating to electromagnetic fields.
CO2Emissions
Both the European Union and Italy are signatories to the Kyoto
Protocol, which was signed under the United Nations Framework
Convention on Climate Change. In accordance with a
burden-sharing agreement among EU member states, Italy has set a
target to reduce emissions of CO2 and the other GHGs
listed in the Kyoto Protocol over the 2008-2012 period by 6.5%
from their 1990 levels. As of 2002, we produced approximately
16% of total GHG emissions in Italy.
In implementing the Kyoto protocol, on November 19, 1998,
the Italian inter-ministerial committee for economic planning
issued the guidelines for Italian policies and measures for the
reduction of GHG emissions in order to implement the Kyoto
Protocol. These guidelines set targets for CO2 and
other GHG emissions to be achieved through measures concerning
various sectors of the Italian economy, including a reduction of
carbon produced in thermal electricity generation, an increased
use of electricity generation from renewable
73
resources and demand-side management to increase the efficiency
of energy use. Furthermore, the guidelines promote certain
projects aimed at the development of so called clean energy.
In July 2000, we signed a voluntary undertaking with the
Environment Ministry and the Ministry of Productive Activities
to reduce the annual level of CO2 emissions produced
by our plants during the period between 2002 and 2006 from our
level of emissions in 1990. The undertaking anticipates a number
of measures to reduce GHGs emissions, including employing
high-efficiency technologies, such as combined cycle
conversions, promoting the use of renewable resources and
developing innovative generation technologies.
In January 1999, the Italian government introduced a carbon tax
in accordance with European Union directives. Under the current
Italian legislation, the amount of the tax, which is based on
fossil fuel consumption, although initially scheduled to
increase on an annual basis from 1999 through 2005, has been
frozen at the level for 1999. The relevant EU directives provide
for a periodic review of this tax, including its possible
abolition. We and other European electricity companies believe
that with the introduction of the emission trading rules from
January 2005, the carbon tax should be abolished in order to
avoid market distortion and double taxation.
In 2002 and 2003, our carbon tax liability amounted to
approximately
€42.5 million
and
€39.8 million,
respectively. In 2004, our carbon tax liability amounted to
approximately
€40 million.
With a view to ensuring compliance with the Kyoto Protocol, in
2003, the EU adopted an Emission Trading Directive establishing
a scheme for GHG emission allowance trading. Italian legislation
implementing this directive came into force at the end of 2004.
In October 2004, the EU also passed another directive (the
so-called “linking directive”), which amended the
Emission Trading directive to allow the use of other flexible
mechanisms for limiting GHG emissions. In 2005, Italy passed a
framework law that will permit it to implement this linking
directive.
The Emission Trading Directive required that each member state
submit to the European Commission a proposal on how it plans to
comply with the directive’s emission limits. This proposal
is to consist of an allocation plan by which each member state
sets CO2 emissions thresholds for the 2005-2007
period for various industries, including the energy sector, and
must provide for fines to be imposed on entities whose emissions
exceed these thresholds. In 2006, the allowable levels for the
2008 to 2012 period will be established.
In July 2004, the Environment Ministry and the Ministry of
Productive Activities submitted to the European Commission a
national allocation plan for Italy. Under the national
allocation plan, the thresholds for thermal power plants would
vary depending on the type of fuel burned, so as not to
disadvantage plants that burn fuels such as coal, which generate
higher levels of emissions. In December 2004, the Italian
government put in place the procedures necessary to authorize
plants to emit GHGs and for it to gather the necessary
information to grant emission rights. We received the relevant
authorizations for our power plants in December 2004. In an
amendment to the national allocation plan published in February
2005, the Enel Group was assigned emissions quotas of
54 million, 45 million and 45 million metric tons
of CO2 for the years 2005, 2006 and 2007,
respectively.
On May 25, 2005, the European Commission approved
Italy’s national allocation plan, including, however,
modifications that reduce the allowable emissions assigned to
Italy by 9% (from 255 million metric tons to
232 million per year) and therefore require a revision to
the February 2005 emissions quota allocations. The Environment
Ministry and the Ministry of Productive Activities are currently
working to allocate the overall allowable emissions levels among
the various operators in the industries that are subject to the
regulations. In 2006, the ministries will establish the
allowable levels for the 2008 to 2012 period.
Should the final allocation be insufficient, we could be
required to purchase emissions trading rights on the market,
which could result in an increase in our electricity generation
costs. At May 31, 2005, the weighted average price over the
prior six months for one emission trading right for the years
2005, 2006 and 2007 was approximately
€13.
74
We plan to comply with the Emission Trading Directive limits and
Italian implementing legislation through:
•
Conversion of existing oil-fired thermal power plants into
gas-fired or high-efficiency coal-fired plants;
•
Increased renewable energy capacity; and
•
Purchases of emission rights from third parties.
We are not able to predict what emissions levels will be
allocated to the Enel Group for the 2005-2007 period, nor for
any subsequent period, nor whether such allocation will be
sufficient to meet our production needs, and we cannot be
certain that our current plans for our generation plants will be
adequate to permit us to comply with the required levels once
they are defined. Please see “Item 3. Key
Information — Risk Factors — Risks Related
to Our Energy Businesses — The effect of the
anticipated market for CO2 emissions trading on our
business is uncertain.”
SO2, NOxand Other Emissions
The principal EU directive on air emissions affecting the
electricity industry is the large combustion plants directive
(“LCPD”). The LCPD requires each EU member state to
establish and implement a program of progressive reduction of
total SO2 emissions and total NOx
emissions from generation plants licensed before July 1,
1987, and to establish emission limits for SO2,
NOx and particulate matter from individual generation
plants licensed after July 1, 1987. In 2001, new, more
stringent emission limits were set in an amendment to the LCPD.
Limitations on plant emissions set by Italian legislation are
stricter than those envisaged in the LCPD as well as in the 2001
amendment (which Italy has not yet implemented), also requiring
5-year gradual reduction targets of aggregate emissions from
plants licensed prior to July 1, 1988 through the end of
2003. We achieved the required reductions in each of the years
in which they were applicable, including 2003.
In addition, Italy is bound by an EU directive issued in 2001
mandating that member states achieve specified reduction targets
on SO2, NOx volatile organic compounds and
NH3 emissions by 2010. To this end, member states
were required to establish and implement a program of emissions
reduction in order to achieve the targets set in the directive.
Italy is also a member of the Helsinki Protocol and the Oslo
Protocol, which require signatory countries to reduce
SO2 emissions, and the Sofia Protocol, which requires
signatories to reduce NOx emissions. The requirements
under these protocols have been reflected in Italian law.
The following tables show our actual level of SO2 and
NOx emissions for 2001, 2002, 2003 and 2004, and the
reductions in the level of these emissions compared to 2000.
Reductions of SO2emissions against 2000
levels
Percentage
Year
Metric Tons
Change
(In thousands)
2001
213
(11
)
2002
187
(21
)
2003
101
(58
)
2004
94
(61
)
Reductions of NOxemissions against 2000
levels
Percentage
Year
Metric Tons
Change
(In thousands)
2001
71
(8
)
2002
71
(9
)
2003
62
(20
)
2004
56
(28
)
In addition, in 1990, Italy established a regulation limiting
emissions of polluting substances from thermal plants licensed
before July 1, 1988, that is more strict than the LCPD and
covers a much broader range of
75
pollutants. This regulation required that individual existing
thermal plants in Italy reduce emissions to levels similar to
those established under the LCPD for individual plants licensed
after July 1, 1988. This regulation also provided a time
schedule for the implementation of environmental compliance
measures at existing plants.
In response to this regulation, in 1990, we implemented a
significant program of environmental measures that affect our
entire thermal generation operation. We submitted this program
to the relevant ministries of the Italian government, including
those for industry, environment and health. The program was
approved and provided for modifications to both physical plant
and operating practices. Enel has achieved the targets the
Italian regulation provided for the implementation of these
environmental compliance measures for generating facilities.
We are currently in compliance with the limits set by existing
legislation. We had received a derogation from the required
limits with regard to our plant at Porto Tolle pending our
receipt of required authorizations to effect a conversion of the
plant to make it fully compliant. While this derogation expired
on December 31, 2004, we expect to complete the conversion
of this plant by 2010, and meanwhile are meeting the required
limits at the plant through operational means.
In 1997, the Italian parliament imposed a tax on total
SO2 and NOx emissions from thermal plants
that have a nominal capacity of greater than 50 MWh. These
plants are the same plants as those regulated under the LCPD. In
2002, 2003 and 2004, our costs in connection with this tax were
approximately
€14.4 million,
€9 million
and
€8.4 million,
respectively.
PCBs and Asbestos
In May 1999, the Italian government adopted a legislative decree
concerning the recovery and disposal of electric transformers
and other equipment containing polychlorinated biphenyls, or
PCBs. Pursuant to this decree, we are delivering all of our
equipment containing PCBs to companies authorized to recover and
dispose of such equipment. In December 2003, we adopted a
disposal plan aimed at the phasing out of all equipment with a
concentration of PCBs over 500 parts per million.
We also deliver waste products containing asbestos to
specialized companies authorized to treat and dispose of
asbestos. Such waste products derive from the clean up of our
plants we conduct in accordance with our general maintenance and
environmental clean-up programs.
Water Pollution Prevention
We are subject to environmental laws and regulations limiting
heat and other characteristics of water discharges from our
thermal plants and waste water from our hydroelectric plants. In
May 1999, the Italian parliament adopted a new law for the
prevention of the pollution of fresh and salt water, which was
amended in August 2000. In the same year, the EU adopted a
directive to prevent water pollution.
Although Italy has not yet implemented this directive, we
believe that the new legislation will not affect the operation
of our plants, because current Italian limits are already in
line with the limits it sets. Similarly, we believe that the
water treatment facilities already in operation at our
generation plants are in line with the new requirements on waste
water.
Solid Waste Management
In February 1997, the Italian government issued a legislative
decree implementing the EU directives on solid waste management.
In accordance with this decree, we increased the level of
recycling of our waste.
Site Clearance
Italian legislation provides for ground and underground
inspections to evaluate the possible contamination of sites,
particularly in areas declared to be of national interest, using
specific chemical, physical and historical analyses. If sites we
own are found to be contaminated, the current regulation
requires that we undertake a program of site clearance and
restoration. In that case, under new legislation, the Italian
government may provide financial support for the restoration of
contaminated sites located in areas of national interest. Based
76
on our environmental compliance practices and the current
regulatory regime, we do not expect to have significant
liability associated with contamination of sites being inspected.
Landscape Safeguards
We have taken the following actions to reduce the environmental
impact of our distribution lines and Terna’s transmission
lines:
•
Re-using routes of previous power lines wherever possible;
•
Soliciting proposals internationally for the design of new
towers for our transmission lines aimed at reducing the
environmental and aesthetic impact of towers in non-urban areas
of particular landscape value;
•
Acting to reduce the impact of lines in environmentally
sensitive or protected areas;
•
For medium-voltage lines, placing underground cables in urban
areas and aerial cables with low environmental impact in other
areas with specific environmental value; and
•
Using aerial insulated cables or underground cables in low
voltage networks (at present, we have built approximately
two-thirds of our network in this way).
We limit our use of underground high-voltage cables to urban
areas because they are significantly more expensive than aerial
cables and the process of installing them may involve
significant logistic and environmental problems. Between 2000
and 2003:
•
In 2003, our medium voltage aerial insulated cables and
underground cables totaled 127,987 km, which represented 38.3%
of our medium voltage lines, compared to 35.9% in 2000; and
•
In 2003, our low voltage aerial insulated cables and underground
cables totaled 600,675 km, which represented 82.5% of our low
voltage lines, compared to 80.6% in 2000.
In 2004, due to further work on our network, the percentage of
aerial insulated cables and underground cables rose to 39.0% and
82.8% for medium and low voltage lines, respectively.
Environmental Registrations, Certifications and
Authorizations
We have joined EMAS, a European Union initiative to implement a
voluntary environmental management and registration system,
which seeks to improve the level of environmental efficiency and
disclosure of European industrial companies, and includes ISO
14001 certification for registered plants and assets. Rules
concerning EMAS are contained in an EU Regulation issued in
1993. In 2001, the EU passed a new regulation which permitted
the utilization of the EMAS system also for assets not used in
production. Following an experimental study in order to adapt
the environmental management and registration system to the high
voltage transmission grid, in October 2004, Enel
Distribuzione’s distribution network obtained
ISO 14001 environmental certification.
As of December 2004, plants representing approximately 70% of
our net installed generating capacity had obtained ISO 14001
certification. Thirty-four plants representing approximately 28%
of our net installed capacity have also obtained EMAS
registration.
In August 1999, the Italian government enacted a legislative
decree implementing the 1996 EU directive on the prevention and
reduction of pollution. This legislative decree requires all
industrial plants to operate under a new integrated
environmental license by 2007 and to make use of the best
techniques available for the prevention and reduction of
pollution. The new licenses set pollution limits and are
reviewed every five years or at any time plants undergo
significant renovation. Licenses for EMAS-registered plants are
reviewed every eight years.
Cost of Compliance
The costs of ensuring compliance with applicable environmental
regulation generally consist of costs associated with equipping
newly constructed facilities with required technology or
modifying existing facilities to comply with applicable
regulation. In 2004, environmental capital expenditures were
equal to
€112 million,
representing 2.9% of our total capital expenditures. In 2002 and
2003, these environmental capital expendi-
77
tures totaled
€140 million
and
€131 million,
respectively, representing 2.5% and 3.5%, respectively, of our
total capital expenditures.
Discontinued Nuclear Operations
Since November 2000, we have not owned any nuclear power plants.
We have not produced electricity from nuclear power plants since
1988.
Following a national referendum in 1987 in which the Italian
electorate expressed its opposition to the use of nuclear power,
the Italian government ordered the interruption of power
production from nuclear fuels and we ceased operations at our
four nuclear plants in Italy, which had an aggregate net
installed capacity of 1,500 MW.
In addition to our nuclear power plants, we owned a 33% stake in
NERSA, an electricity generation company that operated a nuclear
power plant located in France. French and German utilities owned
the balance of NERSA. In July 1998, we sold our stake in NERSA.
We, however, retained ownership and responsibility for the
decommissioning of our share of the nuclear fuel in the plant.
Pursuant to the Bersani Decree, we transferred our discontinued
nuclear operations to So.g.i.n., then one of our wholly owned
subsidiaries. The principal activity of So.g.i.n. will be the
decommissioning of the nuclear plants and of our share of the
nuclear fuel in the NERSA plant in France, including disposal of
nuclear fuel and nuclear waste.
Under the Bersani Decree, we were required to transfer to the
MEF all the shares of So.g.i.n. at no cost. The transfer was
completed on November 3, 2000.
In 2005, we have entered into agreements that we expect to lead
to our entry into the nuclear power generation sector. Please
see “— Business — The Enel
Group — Generation and Energy Management —
International Generation,” and “— Nuclear
Liability” below.
Nuclear Liability
Italy is a party to the 1960 Paris Convention on Third Party
Liability in the Field of Nuclear Energy and the 1963 Brussels
Supplementary Convention. Italian law implementing the
conventions imposes strict liability for claims relating to
nuclear plants and the transportation and storage of nuclear
matter. Strict liability under Italian law means that someone
does not need to be negligent in order to be found liable. The
law imposes strict liability for nuclear accidents only on the
entity that is the operator of the plant at the time of the
accident. Consequently, we are not liable for any accident that
may occur after the transfer to the MEF of So.g.i.n.’s
shares on November 3, 2000, even if the cause of the
accident predates the transfer. Although we are not aware of any
accident that predates the transfer, we will remain liable for
any accident that occurred before the transfer, even if the
damage, or the accident itself, is discovered in the future. The
operator of the plant may claim reimbursement from a third party
which has contributed to the cause of the accident for any sums
it may have to pay but only if that party has accepted liability
contractually or is a physical person who has intentionally
caused the damage. Italian law implementing the conventions
imposes a maximum period of ten years from the date of the
accident in which someone claiming damages must bring claims. At
the time of our transfer of So.g.i.n.’s shares, we
represented to the Treasury that we had performed, on a regular
basis, every required test on our nuclear plants and that we
were not aware, with respect to all nuclear assets owned by
So.g.i.n., of any event which might be the source of civil
liability for nuclear operations.
Under Italian law and in accordance with the Paris Convention,
direct liability arising from nuclear liability claims is
limited to five million International Monetary Fund Special
Drawing Rights (“SDRs”) per accident. Under Italian
law, to the extent any claim exceeds five million SDRs, someone
claiming damages may sue us for only five million SDRs and must
sue the Italian government for the excess liability up to
175 million SDRs. If the claim is in excess of
175 million SDRs, that person must sue the signatories to
the conventions, but then only for the excess liability up to
300 million SDRs. However, the Italian government can claim
reimbursement from us for any sums it may have to pay because of
a nuclear accident arising from negligence on our part. On
May 13, 2005, five million SDRs equaled approximately
€5.9 million.
78
A provision of the Italian law implementing the conventions
states that when damage has been caused concurrently by a
nuclear accident and the emission of ionizing radiation, the
liability of the person that caused this radiation is not
subject to the limitations described above for damages caused by
that emission. This provision does not fully conform to the
conventions because it does not specify that the ionizing
radiation must not independently qualify as a nuclear accident
in order to give rise to unlimited liability. We believe,
however, that the correct interpretation of Italian law
implementing the conventions is that only radiation not
classified as a nuclear accident gives rise to liability outside
the limitations described above. We believe all emissions of
radiation originating from within nuclear plants would qualify
as nuclear accidents. As a consequence, because we held nuclear
material inside our plants, we believe that we could only be
liable for amounts beyond the limitations described above under
remote circumstances.
As noted above, in February 2005, we agreed to acquire power
generation operations in Slovakia that include nuclear power
plant facilities. We expect the this transaction to close by the
end of 2005. Slovakia is a party to the Vienna Convention on
Civil Liability for Nuclear Damages, under which operators of
nuclear installations have strict liability, and, as under the
Paris Convention, liability is limited in amount and in time; it
also addresses the insurance coverage nuclear operators
(including SE) are required to have.
On May 30, 2005, we entered into a memorandum of
understanding with EDF regarding an industrial partnership that
would permit us to invest in the French electricity market,
including in EDF’s latest generation European Pressurized
Water Reactor, or “EPR,” nuclear power plant project.
Under the memorandum of understanding, EDF will be the operator
of the power plant, and will bear any related nuclear civil
liability. Please see “— The Enel
Group — Generation and Energy Management —
International Generation.”
Telecommunications Regulation
The Communications Authority and the Minister of Communications
regulate all aspects of the fixed-line telephony and mobile
telephony services and Internet markets. Their regulatory powers
include licensing, interconnection, frequency allocation,
numbering, universal service obligation, tariff regulation and
rebalancing and arbitration of disputes between carriers.
Previous Italian regulations required telecommunications
operators to obtain a license from the Minister of
Communications to provide fixed-line voice or mobile telephony,
or an authorization to provide data transmission, Internet
services and all other services; an authorization is considered
to have been obtained by the operator upon such operator’s
notice to the Minister of Communications of its intention to
start offering telecommunications services subject to
authorization unless the Minister of Communications objects to
such intention.
Following the implementation of European directives that created
a new regulatory framework for telecommunications in 2003,
fixed-line voice telephony services and mobile telephony
services will no longer be subject to a license requirement,
although existing license holders, including mobile telephony
operators, will continue to operate under existing licenses
until they expire. Under the new framework, all operators will
simply need an authorization from the Minister of Communications.
Furthermore, under the new regulatory framework, all the
existing obligations imposed on operators considered as having
significant market power need to be extensively reviewed. Such
obligations can be confirmed, amended or withdrawn. In addition,
new obligations can also be imposed, but only subject to
stringent requirements. The revision is entrusted to the
Communications Authority and is currently on-going.
The Communications Authority has the following main objectives:
•
to promote convergence among mobile telephony, fixed-line
telephony, television and Internet services as well as the
development of third-generation wireless and mobile systems;
•
to introduce further competition into the Italian
telecommunications market;
•
to promote liberalization in the broadcasting and media industry;
•
easing barriers to entry;
•
fostering the growth of new markets; and
•
protecting consumers.
79
Interconnection
Telecom Italia, the former monopoly telephone services provider,
owns and operates the largest fixed-line voice telephony network
in Italy. As a result, other operators’ ability to
interconnect with Telecom Italia’s network significantly
affects their ability to provide fixed-line voice telephony and
other telecommunications services. Currently, Telecom Italia is
required to set interconnection rates subject to Communications
Authority approval to ensure that interconnection rates are
consistent with targets set by the Communications Authority
under a price cap regime for interconnection rates introduced in
2003.
Under a law enacted in 2002, Internet service providers are
entitled to enter into interconnection agreements with Telecom
Italia and other operators considered as having significant
market power. In a decision issued in July 2002, the
Communications Authority established that Wind is an operator
having significant market power with respect to termination of
calls onto the numbers of Internet operators. As a consequence,
Wind is under an obligation to enter into interconnection
agreements with operators that so request at rates that reflect
costs. This obligation will be re-examined during the process of
implementing the new European regulatory framework.
The Communications Authority must also approve the
interconnection rates Telecom Italia charges for calls
originated on its fixed network and terminated on mobile
networks.
Universal Service
Current regulations allow the Communications Authority to
require other voice telephony operators to compensate Telecom
Italia for the costs the former incumbent provider incurs in
connection with its obligation to provide universal service,
defined as a minimum set of services of a given quality,
available to end users regardless of their geographical location
and at an affordable price. In 2002, the Communications
Authority required Wind and Infostrada to pay approximately
€1.5 million
and
€0.8 million,
respectively, in respect of this obligation for the year 2001.
With a decision issued in 2004, the Communications Authority has
required Wind to pay
€3.9 million
for the year 2002. No decision has yet been issued for the years
2003 or 2004.
Fixed-line Voice Telephony
The Communications Authority and the Minister of Communications
have implemented measures to promote competition in the
fixed-line voice telephony services market, such as:
•
carrier selection, which allows customers to select carriers on
a call-by-call basis for both long-distance and local calls by
dialing a set prefix before making a call;
•
carrier pre-selection, which allows customers to use alternative
carriers’ networks for all of their local, long-distance,
fixed- to-mobile and international calls without dialing a
carrier selection code;
•
number portability, which allows customers to keep the same
telephone number when they change carrier; and
•
unbundling of the local loop of Telecom Italia, which allows
competing carriers access to the so-called “last
mile,” or the wires leading directly into customers’
homes or offices.
In addition, Telecom Italia is subject to a price cap for
fixed-line telephony services to final customers. Also, Telecom
Italia is required to offer access to its network so as to
enable its competitors to offer high-speed Internet access or
x-DSL services under economic conditions set forth by the
Communications Authority.
Mobile Telephony
Telecom Italia Mobile, Vodafone Omnitel, Wind and “3”
are the current operators in the Italian mobile telephony
services market. Pursuant to a Communications Authority
determination adopted originally in 1999 and subsequently
confirmed in 2002 and 2003, Telecom Italia Mobile and Vodafone
Omnitel are operators with significant market power and, as
such, must offer fixed-line operators non-discriminatory and
cost-based interconnection rates for terminating calls.
In 2001, the Communications Authority extended number
portability to mobile telephony. As a result, competition in the
mobile market has increased.
80
Internet and Electronic Commerce
Currently, Internet operators must obtain an authorization to
provide Internet services from the Communications Authority.
However, Internet service providers are not subject to universal
service obligations, the tariff regime or the other strict
regulatory requirements applicable to fixed-line voice telephony
and mobile telephony services operators.
Property, Plants and Equipment
At December 31, 2004, we had 758 generating plants,
consisting of thermal, hydroelectric, geothermal and other
renewable resources facilities, 595 of which were located in
Italy. For further information with respect to our plants,
please see “— Business — The Enel
Group — Generation and Energy Management.” As of
December 31, 2004, the transmission grid that Terna owns,
which constituted more than 90% of the national electricity
transmission grid, consisted of a total of approximately 38,696
km of lines and 300 primary transformer stations. For a
description of such properties and related construction,
expansion and improvement plans, please see
“— Business — The Enel
Group — Transmission.” We own the principal
electricity distribution network in Italy, which consisted, at
December 31, 2004, of a total of 1,089,845 km of lines,
mostly medium and low voltage, and 412,670 primary and secondary
transformer substations. For a description of such properties
and related construction, expansion and improvement plans,
please see “— Business — The Enel
Group — Capital Investment Program — Sales,
Infrastructure and Networks.” At December 31, 2004,
through Wind, we owned approximately 18,300 km of fiber optic
cable for the provision of telecommunications services. For a
description of such properties and related construction,
expansion and improvement plans, please see
“— Business — The Enel
Group — Telecommunications.” At December 31,2004, we owned real estate, mainly in Italy, with an approximate
net book value of
€818 million,
consisting mainly of office buildings and other commercial
properties and to a lesser extent residential real estate. For a
description of our real estate properties and activities, please
see “— Business — The Enel
Group — Services and Other Activities — Real
estate and other services.”
Management believes that our significant properties are in good
condition and that they are adequate to meet our needs.
ITEM 5.
OPERATING AND FINANCIAL REVIEW AND PROSPECTS
Summary of Results
In 2004, our consolidated operating revenues increased by 16.5%,
from
€31,317 million
in 2003 to
€36,489 million.
Our operating expenses, including depreciation and amortization
expenses, increased by 13.5% from
€26,585 million
in 2003 to
€30,164 million.
Our operating income increased by 33.7%, from
€4,732 million
in 2003 to
€6,325 million.
Our net financial expenses amounted to
€1,103 million,
a decrease of 2.4% as compared to
€1,130 million
in 2003. Total extraordinary income and expenses amounted to net
expenses of
€818 million,
as compared with net expenses of
€136 million
recorded in 2003. Our net income increased by 7.9% from
€2,509 million
in 2003 to
€2,706 million
in 2004. These results of operations are calculated in
accordance with Italian GAAP.
Our principal measure of liquidity is net financial
indebtedness, which was
€24,296 million
at December 31, 2004, as compared to
€24,174 million
at December 31, 2003. Net financial indebtedness is a
non-Italian GAAP measure; cash at banks and marketable
securities, the most directly comparable Italian GAAP measure,
was
€364 million
at December 31, 2004, as compared to
€452 million
at December 31, 2003. Please see
“— Liquidity and Capital Resources —
Capital Resources” for a reconciliation of net financial
indebtedness to cash at banks and marketable securities. As of
December 31, 2004, we had 61,898 employees, as compared to
64,770 as of December 31, 2003.
We are required to adopt international financial reporting
standards (“IFRS”) in the preparation of our
consolidated financial statements for 2005 (please see
“— Process of Transition to International
Financial Reporting Standards”). On May 12, 2005, we
published our IFRS interim report for the quarter ended on
March 31, 2005, which has not been audited; in that report,
we restated our results for the first quarter of 2004 in
accordance with IFRS for comparative purposes. In accordance
with IFRS 1, we also included in our
81
quarterly report a reconciliation to IFRS of our Italian GAAP
consolidated stockholders’ equity as of January 1,2004 and December 31, 2004 and our net income (before
minority interest) for the year ended December 31, 2004.
The financial information below as of January 1, 2004, as
of and for the year ended December 31, 2004 and that
included in the first quarter report as indicated above, have
been prepared in accordance with those IFRS standards and
interpretations of the International Financial Reporting
Interpretations Committee (“IFRIC”) issued and
effective, or issued and early adopted, at May 12, 2005, as
if such standards were in effect as of December 31, 2005.
The IFRS standards and IFRIC interpretations that will be
applicable at December 31, 2005, including those that will
be applicable on an optional basis, are not known with certainty
at the time we prepared this financial information. Accordingly,
such information is preliminary and is subject to change related
to new IFRS standards that become effective between May 13,2005 and December 31, 2005 and new promulgated
interpretations with regard to existing standards. In this
regard, practice with respect to the interpretations and
application of standards continues to evolve.
As compared to our results of operations for the first quarter
of 2004 as restated in accordance with IFRS, our operating
revenues increased by 21.4%, from
€7,981 million
in the first quarter of 2004 to
€9,685 million;
our operating expenses, including depreciation and amortization
expenses, increased by 28.6% from
€6,258 million
in the first quarter of 2004 to
€8,047 million;
our operating income decreased by 4.9%, from
€1,723 million
in the first quarter of 2004 to
€1,638 million;
our net financial expenses amounted to
€231 million,
as compared to
€408 million
in the first quarter of 2004; and our net income increased by
5.3%, from
€729 million
in the first quarter of 2004 to
€768 million.
The Electricity Market Regulatory Framework
Overview
Our financial results have been and will be affected to a large
extent by the developments in the regulatory framework for the
Italian electricity market, which was first opened to
competition by the Bersani Decree in 1999 and has been
subsequently further liberalized by EU and national legislation.
The Bersani Decree also provided for the first time that certain
customers, also known as Eligible Customers, could freely choose
their supplier and buy electricity on the free market at
negotiated prices. This freedom has been progressively extended,
starting with customers with high consumption thresholds to all
non-residential customers as of July 1, 2004. In 2007, all
customers will become Eligible Customers. Currently,
Non-Eligible Customers must purchase electricity from their
local distribution company. The price of electricity for
Non-Eligible Customers is set by the Energy Authority.
On April 1, 2004, the Italian power exchange, a virtual
marketplace for the trading of electricity, started operations.
The Single Buyer, a state-owned entity entrusted with the
responsibility of purchasing all of the electricity to be
supplied to the regulated market, also started operations on
that date. Please see “— Comparability of
Information — Regulatory and Other Developments”
for a description of the impact of the start of operation of the
Italian power exchange and the Single Buyer on our results in
2004.
Since the start of the liberalization of the market, the Italian
Energy Authority, the Italian Antitrust Authority and the
European Commission have adopted several measures to further
competition and constantly monitor the market in order to reduce
the risk of abuses of market power. Furthermore, under the
Bersani Decree, no single company or group may have more than a
50% market share of the electricity generation and import market
after January 1, 2003, which limit resulted in our sale of
the Gencos.
In 2004, a governmental decree provided for the transfer by the
Gestore della Rete to Terna of management and operation of the
national transmission grid by October 31, 2005. Following
such transfer, no electricity operator, including us, will be
entitled to control more than 5% of the voting rights with
respect to the appointment of Terna’s directors. Also, Enel
is required to reduce its shareholding in Terna to no more than
20% by July 1, 2007. In February 2005, Terna and the
Gestore della Rete entered into an agreement for the transfer to
Terna of the grid management activities. The transaction remains
subject to Antitrust Authority approvals.
Please see “Item 4. Information on the
Company — Regulatory Matters — Electricity
Regulation” for a more detailed discussion of the
regulatory framework of the electricity market and
“Item 3. Key Informa-
82
tion — Risk Factors — Risks Relating to Our
Energy Business” for a discussion of the principal
regulatory and other risks we face.
Tariffs and Prices
Most of our operating revenues come from the sale of
electricity. The price of electricity has historically been
determined by a system of tariffs. Since the liberalization of
the electricity market, the Energy Authority sets tariffs for
electricity sold on the regulated market and updates them
periodically. The Energy Authority also sets transport charges
payable by all customers for the transmission and distribution
of electricity. Electricity on the free market can be bought
through bilateral contracts or on the Italian power exchange.
Our operating revenues from electricity operations are directly
related to the level of transport charges and the price of
electricity for the regulated market. In addition, our revenues
also include system charges. Please see “Item 4.
Information on the Company — Regulatory
Matters — Electricity Regulation — Tariff
Structure” for a more detailed discussion of these charges.
The tariff regime that applied in the period from 2002 through
February 2004 included:
•
a “generation cost component,” reflecting fuel
costs; and
•
the application of global price-cap reductions to transmission
and distribution transport charges.
In 2004, the Energy Authority set new base tariffs for the
2004-2007 period, which have been in force since
February 1, 2004. The Energy Authority has estimated that
the new tariff regime in place for 2004-2007 will result in a
reduction of the overall tariff paid by regulated market
customers of approximately 13% in real terms (assuming no change
in fuel costs and system charges) during the period. The actual
impact of tariff levels on our revenues depends on a number of
factors, including the volume of electricity we sell in the
regulated market, the fuel costs incurred and the mix of
customers we serve.
Prices for electricity sold on the Italian power exchange are
determined on the basis of competitive bidding (please see
“Item 4. Information on the Company —
Regulatory Matters — Electricity
Regulation — The Italian Power Exchange”). Prices
on the Italian power exchange also influence the generation cost
component of the tariff, which is now calculated by the Energy
Authority every three months on the basis of an estimate of the
average costs that the Single Buyer incurs for the procurement
of electricity, both on the Italian power exchange and through
bilateral contracts.
Please see “Item 4. Information on the
Company — Regulatory Matters — Electricity
Regulation — The Tariff Structure” for a more
detailed discussion of electricity charges.
Macroeconomic Factors
Electricity demand in Italy grew by 0.4% in 2004, after having
grown by 3.2% in 2003 and by 1.9% in 2002. Growth in demand for
electricity is determined by a variety of factors, including the
rate of economic growth, the level of business activity and
weather conditions. Please see “Item 4. Information on
the Company — Business — The Enel
Group — Italian Electricity Demand” for more
information about Italian electricity demand in the period.
Interest rates in Italy and the rest of Europe have declined in
recent years, reflecting the general slowdown of the economy.
The weighted average interest rate on our long-term debt
declined from 4.6% as of December 31, 2002 to 4.1% as of
December 31, 2003, and 3.8% as of December 31, 2004.
Our financing costs increase or decrease in line with changes in
interest rates.
Although historically we were insulated to a significant extent
from the economic effect of fluctuations in fuel prices through
the application of the fuel cost component of the tariff
described above, time lags between our actual purchase of fuel
and the calculation and payment to us of such fuel cost
component affected our revenues and income. As a result of the
introduction of the Italian power exchange, which began
operations on April 1, 2004, and increases in the number of
consumers qualifying as Eligible Customers, we now face
increased risks relating to fuel price fluctuations, which we
attempt to manage through implementation of our hedging policy.
Please see “Item 11. Quantitative and Qualitative
Disclosure About Market Risk — Price Risk Management
and Market Risk Information” for a more detailed
description of our hedging policy.
83
Critical Accounting Policies
Our results of operations, as presented below, are based on the
application of Italian GAAP. The application of these principles
often requires management to make certain judgments, assumptions
and estimates that may result in different financial
presentations. We believe that certain accounting principles are
critical in terms of understanding our financial statements. We
believe that our most critical accounting policies relate to the
following.
Use of estimates. The preparation of financial statements
in conformity with Italian GAAP requires management to make
judgments, estimates and assumptions that affect the reported
amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent
assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements,
and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the
reporting period. Certain accounting principles require
subjective and complex judgments used in the preparation of
financial statements. Accordingly, a different financial
presentation could result depending on the judgment, estimates
or assumptions that are used. Such estimates and assumptions,
include, but are not specifically limited to: depreciation,
amortization, interest rates, discount rates, future commodity
prices, investment returns, impact of new accounting standards,
international economic policy, future costs associated with
long-term contractual obligations and future compliance costs
associated with environmental regulations. Actual results could
materially differ from those estimates or assumptions. Effective
January 1, 2004, the economic depreciation rates of certain
assets related to the distribution network of our Sales,
Infrastructure and Networks segment were revised in order to
better reflect the estimated economic useful life of these
facilities. Please see “Increased estimates of the useful
lives of certain distribution assets” in
“— Comparability of
Information — Regulatory and Other
Developments.”
Recoverability of long-lived assets. We periodically
review the carrying value of our long-lived assets held and used
and that of assets to be disposed of, including goodwill and
other intangible assets, when events and circumstances warrant
such a review. If the carrying value of a long-lived asset group
is considered impaired, an impairment charge is recorded for the
amount by which the carrying value of the long-lived asset group
exceeds its estimated recovery value, in relation to its use or
realization, as determined by reference to the most recent
corporate plans. Management believes that the estimates of these
recovery values are reasonable; however, changes in estimates of
such recovery values could affect the relevant valuations. The
analysis of each long-lived asset group is unique and requires
management to use certain estimates and assumptions that are
deemed prudent and reasonable for a particular set of
circumstances.
Realization of deferred tax assets. As of
December 31, 2004, we had assets recorded for tax loss
carry-forwards related primarily to our telecommunications
segment. We have recorded our deferred tax assets in an amount
that we believe is more likely than not to be recovered. The
recoverability of the deferred tax assets associated with the
tax loss carry-forwards of such entities are subject to the
achievement of future profitability by the merged entities.
While we have considered future taxable income and used ongoing
prudent tax planning strategies in assessing the need for
valuation allowances, should we determine that we would not be
able to realize all or part of our net deferred tax assets in
the future, the resulting adjustment to the deferred tax assets
would be charged to income in the period such determination was
made.
Litigation. We are defendants in a number of legal
proceedings incidental to the generation, transmission and
distribution of electricity. Because of the nature of these
proceedings, it is not possible to predict the ultimate outcomes
of certain of these matters, some of which may be unfavorable to
us. However, provisions are made for all significant liabilities
where it has been determined by legal advisors that an
unfavorable outcome is probable and the amount of loss is
estimable. A number of disputes are pending in relation to urban
planning, landscape and environmental matters (mainly related to
exposure to electromagnetic fields) linked to the construction
and operation of several of our generating plants and power
lines. The examination of such disputes, including on the basis
of legal advice, leads us to believe that unfavorable outcomes
would be a remote possibility. While the possibility is remote,
the risk that a limited number of cases might have unfavorable
outcomes, which could entail the payment of damages, cannot be
ruled out. At the present time, the possible imposition and
magnitude of any such damages are not predictable and, we have,
therefore, not accrued any liabilities for these disputes.
Allowance for doubtful accounts. The allowance for
doubtful accounts reflects our estimate of losses inherent in
our credit portfolio. We have established provisions for
expected credit losses, based on past
84
experience with similar receivables, including current and
historical past due amounts, write-offs and collections, the
careful monitoring of portfolio credit quality and the current
and projected economic and market conditions. We believe that
our reserves are adequate; however, different assumptions or
changes in economic circumstances could result in changes to the
allowance for doubtful accounts and therefore could affect
earnings.
Comparability of Information
Several factors significantly affected the inter-period
comparability of the information presented in this section,
including changes in market regulation and other developments,
changes in our scope of consolidation and changes in our
business segment presentation. These factors, which should be
considered when reviewing the performance of our individual
segments and of the Group as a whole, are discussed below.
Regulatory and Other Developments
The most important regulatory developments affecting our
financial results for 2004 are discussed below.
•
Start of operation of the Italian power exchange and the
Single Buyer. On April 1, 2004, the Italian power
exchange for the spot trading of electricity started operations
and the Single Buyer became responsible for purchasing all of
the electricity to be supplied to the regulated market. Please
see “Item 4. Information on the Company —
Regulatory Matters — Electricity Regulation” for
a detailed discussion of the Italian power exchange, the Single
Buyer and related developments in the Italian electricity
market. As a result of this development, since April 1,2004, our Generation and Energy Management segment sells the
electricity we produce that is destined for the regulated market
to the Single Buyer, and our Sales, Infrastructure and Networks
segment purchases the electricity that it distributes on the
regulated market from the Single Buyer. We now record these
sales and purchases as operating revenues and operating
expenses, respectively. Before April 1, 2004, our
Generation and Energy Management segment sold electricity for
distribution on the regulated market directly to our Sales,
Infrastructure and Networks segment, and the revenues and costs
arising from these sales were eliminated from, and therefore not
recorded in, our consolidated financial statements. As a result,
both our operating revenues and operating expenses have
increased substantially on a consolidated basis since
April 1, 2004. However, while this change has affected the
comparability of our revenues and expenses for the periods
presented, it did not have a material impact on our consolidated
operating income in 2004. Sales to the Single Buyer are now
included in the line item “Sales to regulatory entities,
sales on the free market and sales on foreign markets” in
the results presented below (please see “— 2004
Compared with 2003 — Operating Revenues” for a
description of this line item). For prior periods, this line
item was referred to as “Sales to Eligible Customers, sales
to the Gestore della Rete and sales on foreign markets,” as
the Single Buyer was not fully operational. Purchases from the
Single Buyer are recorded in the operating expense line item
“Purchased Power.”
•
Equalization mechanism to compensate time lag in tariff
setting. The prices distributors pay to the Single Buyer for
electricity to be distributed on the regulated market are set
monthly by the Energy Authority based on the average unit costs
incurred by the Single Buyer in connection with its purchases of
electricity. However, the prices that distributors may charge to
end users on the regulated market are fixed by the Energy
Authority on a quarterly basis. In order to minimize the effects
of this discrepancy, these rules have established a price
equalizing mechanism applicable for the first time in 2004.
Please see “Item 4. Information on the
Company — Regulatory Matters — Electricity
Regulation” for more information on the tariff system and
this equalizing mechanism. We recorded
€231 million
in revenues in 2004 in connection with this equalizing
mechanism. As this mechanism was not operational in 2003, its
introduction has affected the comparability of our revenues for
the periods presented, particularly with respect to our Sales,
Infrastructure and Network segment.
•
Capacity payments. In order to address a current deficit
in Italian generation capacity relative to rising electricity
demand, the regulatory framework provides incentives to power
generators both to build new capacity as well as to maintain
their existing plants in good working order and available to
cover sudden variations in electricity demand. In 2004, the
Energy Authority established a provisional system of payments to
remunerate producers that make generation capacity available to
the electricity
85
system at times of peak demand, known as “capacity
payments.” Capacity payments to a given producer comprise
both an amount due for capacity available on
“critical” days (set by the Gestore della Rete) and a
further amount payable when pool market prices fall below
specified thresholds, as an extra incentive. The provisional
system is expected to remain in place until the end of 2005. The
Energy Authority is currently developing the definitive
mechanism, which by law must be market-based and also provide
incentives for new generation capacity.
•
August 2004 decree on stranded costs. Stranded costs are
current costs deriving from contractual commitments or
investment decisions that electricity companies undertook for
reasons of public policy, at a time when the electricity markets
were not yet open to competition, and could have been recovered
in a monopoly regime but cannot be recovered under a regime of
competitive electricity pricing. Please see “Item 4.
Information on the Company — Regulatory
Matters — Electricity Regulation” for more
information on stranded costs. In August 2004, the MEF and the
Ministry of Productive Activities issued a joint decree that
determined the overall amount of stranded costs we are entitled
to recover. On December 1, 2004, following the European
Commission’s approval of the decree, we became entitled to
recover approximately
€513 million
on account of stranded costs related to our generation plants
for the period 2000-2003, as well as our stranded costs related
to the Nigerian LNG contract, which were determined to be
€555 million
in respect of the 2000-2003 period and approximately
€910 million
in respect of the 2004-2009 period
(€151 million
of which related to 2004). As a result, in 2004 we recorded as
“other revenues” a total of
€1,219 million
arising in connection with stranded costs, the amount we became
entitled to receive in respect of 2004 and prior years under the
August 2004 decree. Of this total, the
€513 million
related to our generation plants and the
€151 million
related to the Nigerian LNG contract for 2004 were recorded by
our Generation and Energy Management segment, and the
€555 million
related to the Nigerian LNG contract in respect of the 2000-2003
period were recorded by our Corporate segment. We have not
actually received these funds, as the manner and timing in which
these amounts are to be paid will be established in a future
decree, which is currently under consideration by the Italian
government.
•
Increased estimates of the useful lives of certain
distribution assets. Effective January 1, 2004, on the
basis of technical tests conducted by external advisors, we
increased our estimates of the useful lives of certain assets
related to the distribution network of our Sales, Infrastructure
and Networks segment. As a consequence, the amount of
depreciation expense we recorded in 2004 with respect to these
assets was lower than the amount recorded for the same assets in
2003 by
€518 million.
Changes in Scope of Consolidation
The principal transactions that have resulted in changes in our
scope of consolidation during the periods under review were the
following:
•
the consolidation for balance sheet purposes, effective
December 31, 2004, of Italgestioni and Italgestioni Gas
(together, the “Italgestioni Group”), which are
companies active in the distribution and sale of natural gas to
end users in the provinces of Calabria and Naples, following our
acquisition of these companies in December 2004;
•
the consolidation, effective October 1, 2004, of Ottogas
Rete and Ottogas Vendita (together, the “Ottogas
Group”), which are companies active in the distribution and
sale of natural gas to end users in the area of Naples and
Salerno, following our acquisition of these companies in
September, 2004;
•
the deconsolidation of NewReal, a company to which we
contributed certain of our real estate assets, effective as of
July 1, 2004, following its disposal on July 14, 2004;
•
the consolidation, effective January 1, 2004, of
Sicilmetano and Sicilmetano Energy, which are companies active
in the distribution and sale of natural gas to end users in
Sicily, following our acquisition of these companies in January
2004;
•
the deconsolidation, effective January 1, 2004, of our
recycling and waste management companies, the Aimeri Group,
which we sold in February 2004;
86
•
the consolidation for balance sheet purposes, as of
December 31, 2003, of the assets and liabilities of
Unión Fenosa, a Spanish company that generates electricity
from renewable resources, which we acquired in December 2003,
and, effective January 1, 2004, its consolidation on a
line-by-line basis for income statement purposes;
•
the elimination of the minority interest relating to Wind
following our acquisition in July 2003 from France
Télécom of the 26.6% of Wind’s share capital that
we did not already own;
•
the consolidation on a line-by-line basis, effective
April 1, 2003, of Maritza East III Power Holding B.V.
(“Maritza”), which in turn controls Maritza
East III., a Bulgarian electricity generation company that
we acquired in March 2003;
•
the deconsolidation of Interpower S.p.A., the third and last
Genco we sold, effective as of January 1, 2003;
•
the deconsolidation of CESI S.p.A. (“CESI”) effective
as of January 1, 2003, reflecting the decline of our
holding to 40.9%, following the disposal of Interpower, through
which we held part of our interest in CESI. CESI provided
research and development services;
•
the consolidation on a line-by-line basis of Camuzzi Gazometri
(“Camuzzi”, now called Enel Rete Gas), effective
July 1, 2002, following our acquisition of this company.
Enel Rete Gas operates natural gas distribution activities in
Italy; and
•
the deconsolidation of Eurogen S.p.A., the second Genco we sold,
effective as of the date of its disposal, May 31, 2002.
Business Segments
Our reportable segments correspond to our divisions and are
Generation and Energy Management, Sales, Infrastructure and
Networks, Transmission, Telecommunications, Corporate and
Services and Other Activities. Please see “Item 4.
Information on the Company — Business —
Overview” for a description of our divisions. In 2004, our
management decided to re-allocate to other segments the
operations that had been grouped in the International segment in
2003. These operations are now included, as appropriate, in the
Generation and Energy Management and Sales, Infrastructure and
Networks segments. In addition, on December 31, 2003, our
Transmission segment acquired our Brazilian transmission grid
businesses from our Services and Other Activities segment, the
results of which have been included in the Transmission segment
since January 1, 2004. In order to present segment
information for the three years ended December 31, 2004, on
a comparable basis, we have reclassified certain segment
information for 2003 and 2002 to conform to the 2004
presentation. Our reportable segments are the following:
Generation and Energy Management. This segment
corresponds to the division that is responsible for our
operations related to the production of electricity and the
procurement and trading of fuel for electricity generation, and
includes power generation activities in Italy and abroad. This
division generates operating revenues mainly from the sale of
electricity to the Single Buyer (or, prior to April 1,2004, to our Sales, Infrastructure and Networks Division), to
the Gestore della Rete and other resellers in the domestic
electricity market, as well as through fuel trading. The
division, which procures fuel for all of the companies of the
Group, also sells natural gas to our Sales, Infrastructure and
Networks Division and to third parties. Since January 1,2003, this division has also sold electricity to large
electricity users, or Eligible Customers with annual electricity
consumption higher than 100 GWh, which were previously served by
our Sales, Infrastructure and Network division. The main
companies in this division include the following: in Italy, Enel
Produzione (thermal and hydroelectric generation), Enel Green
Power (geothermal, hydroelectric and wind power generation), and
Enel Trade (fuel procurement and trading, risk management, sales
to large electricity users). We merged Enel Green Power into
Enel Produzione as of June 1, 2005. Outside of Italy, this
division in 2004 included Viesgo Generaciòn and EUFR in
Spain, Maritza East III in Bulgaria; Enel North America in
the U.S.; and Enel Latin America in Central and South America.
Sales, Infrastructure and Networks. This segment
corresponds to the division that includes our electricity and
gas network operations and carries out distribution and sales of
electricity on the regulated
87
market and to free market customers with an annual electricity
consumption of 100 GWh or lower in Italy. It also distributes
and sells natural gas to end users and provides public and art
lighting services and electricity systems-related services. This
division also include our electricity distribution and sales
activities outside of Italy. Operating revenues at this division
derive primarily from fees for transport of electricity and gas
on our distribution networks, the sale of electricity on the
regulated and free markets and of natural gas to end users.
Starting from January 1, 2003, electricity sales to large
electricity users, which were previously carried out by this
division, are carried out by our Generation and Energy
Management Division. The division’s electricity-related
activities are carried out in Italy primarily through Enel
Distribuzione (sale of electricity on the regulated market and
transport of electricity on our distribution network), Deval
(distribution and sales of electricity in the Valle d’Aosta
area), Enel Energia (sale of electricity on the free market),
Enel Sole (public lighting services) and Enel.si (electricity
systems-related services). Outside of Italy this division
primarily includes Electra de Viesgo Distribuciòn SL
and Viesgo Energia SL in Spain. The division’s natural
gas operations are carried out primarily through Enel Rete Gas,
Ottogas Rete and Italgestioni, which distribute natural gas in
Italy, and Enel Gas, Ottogas Vendita and Italgestioni Gas, which
sell natural gas to end users in Italy. We merged Enel
Distribuzione Gas, GE.AD and Sicilmetano into Enel Rete Gas, and
Sicilmetano Energy in Enel Gas as of December 31, 2004
(except that for accounting purposes we considered these mergers
retroactively effective as of January 1, 2004). We expect
to merge Ottogas Rete and Italgestioni into Enel Rete Gas and
Ottogas Vendita and Italgestioni Gas into Enel Gas by
June 30, 2005.
Transmission. Our transmission segment consists of Terna,
which owns more than 90% of the transmission assets of
Italy’s national electricity grid, and its consolidated
subsidiaries, Transmissora Sudeste Nordeste and Novatrans
Energia, two Brazilian electricity transmission companies. Terna
derives its operating revenues from the transportation of
electricity on the portion of the national transmission grid
that is owned by Terna, but operated by the Gestore della Rete.
We owned 50% of Terna as of December 31, 2004, and
currently have a 36.14% stake, although in May 2005, we agreed
to sell an additional 29.99% stake in Terna in light of
regulations that will prevent any electricity operator,
including us, from controlling more than 5% of the voting rights
with respect to the appointment of Terna’s directors. We
expect to close this transaction and reduce our stake in Terna
to approximately 5% by the end of the third period of 2005, and
to deconsolidate Terna upon closing of this transaction. Please
see “Item 4. Information on the Company —
Business — Overview — Transmission” for
a detailed description of recent transactions involving Terna.
Telecommunications. Our Telecommunications segment
includes the operations of Wind and its consolidated
subsidiaries. Our telecommunications activities include the
offer of mobile telecommunications services, fixed-line
telephony services, Internet and other telecommunication-related
services. We formed Wind in 1997 as a joint venture with France
Télécom and Deutsche Telekom. After Deutsche
Telekom’s exit from the venture in 2000, in July 2003 we
became Wind’s sole shareholder after having acquired France
Télécom’s 26.6% stake. In May 2005, we entered
into an agreement for the sale of Wind to Weather in a series of
transactions that will result in our owning 26.1% of Weather
(which will then control both Wind and Orascom) by mid-2006 and
which we currently expect ultimately to lead to our exit from
the telecommunications business. See “Item 4.
Information on the Company — Business — The
Enel Group — Telecommunications.”
Corporate. Enel, as the parent company, defines the
strategic objectives for the Enel Group and coordinates the
activities of these divisions. In addition, Enel manages finance
operations and insurance risk coverage for all Group companies
and provides assistance and guidelines on organizational,
industrial relations, accounting, administrative, tax and legal
issues. We consider Enel as a separate reportable segment
because it holds long-term contracts to purchase imported
electricity and because it engaged, until 2002, in limited fuel
procurement activities. In the second half of 2002, Enel
completed the transfer of its fuel purchase contracts to Enel
Trade, of our Generation and Energy Management Division. Until
March 31, 2004, Enel sold the imported electricity it
purchases to Enel Distribuzione at prices established by the
Energy Authority. Since that date, Enel has been required to
sell this electricity to the Single Buyer.
88
Services and Other Activities. This segment in 2004
included non-core business operations, including Enelpower,
which provides power-related engineering and contracting
services; Enel.it, which operated our group-wide information
technology unit and other minor businesses, Enel Facility
Management, which provided commercial real estate management
services, APE Gruppo Enel, now Enel Ape, which provides
personnel administration services, and, until its disposal in
July 2004, NewReal, a company with real estate activities.
Effective as of January 1, 2005, we merged Enel.it and Enel
Facility Management into Enel Ape.
Outlook
We expect that the ongoing liberalization of the Italian
electricity sector will continue to materially affect our
financial condition and results of operations over the next
several years.
In our generation business, the further evolution of the
electricity market following the start of operations of the
Italian power exchange in 2004 will have a significant impact on
our business in Italy. In particular, in May 2005, the Energy
Authority proposed certain possible measures to further promote
competition in the wholesale electricity market over the next
few years, including the possible sale or lease by us of
additional generating capacity to third parties. Please see
“Item 4. Information on the Company —
Regulatory Matters — Electricity
Regulation — the Italian Power Exchange” and
“Item 3. Key Information — Risks
Factors — Risks Relating to Our Energy
Business — Regulatory changes promoting market
liberalization have significantly increased competition in our
energy businesses.” We cannot say when or whether these
measures will be enacted, but they could have a significant
effect on our generation business. We are also exposed to
increased competition resulting from the construction of new
generation facilities by our competitors and the development of
new interconnection lines that would increase the volume of
electricity that might be imported in Italy. In this context, we
intend to reduce our costs by reducing our fuel costs for
thermal generation through the continued conversion of
generating capacity to combined cycle gas turbine technology, as
well as to plants that run on lower-cost fuels, such as coal. We
also plan to continue to expand our presence in the renewable
energy sector.
In our electricity distribution and sales business, we expect
that our results in Italy will continue to be affected by the
new tariff regime in place for the 2004-2007 period, which
includes a price-cap mechanism imposing an annual decrease of
3.5% in the value of operating costs and depreciation, excluding
capital costs, for distribution services that can be recovered
through tariffs. We also expect that our sales of electricity in
the regulated market will decrease due to the ongoing
liberalization of the market, including the fact that all
customers will become eligible to purchase electricity on the
free market as of July 1, 2007. However, we expect that the
impact on our revenues of any such decrease will be offset to
some extent by increased fees paid by third parties for
transport of power on our network, as well as increased sales in
the free market. We intend to face these changes in the market
by continuing our program to reduce operating costs, optimizing
our investment expenditures, completing our Telemanagement
project, and strengthening our presence in the electricity
market (including through the offer of new tariff plans and the
roll-out of a new billing system).
In our gas business, we intend to continue to pursue our growth
strategy by selectively acquiring additional natural gas
distribution and sales companies and through targeted marketing,
with the aim of achieving a market share in the distribution and
sale of natural gas in Italy of up to 20% by 2009.
We also intend to pursue our strategy of expanding our
operations outside Italy, particularly in countries where we are
already present or where market liberalization and privatization
efforts are in progress. In this context, in February 2005 we
agreed to purchase a 66% interest in SE, the principal electric
power generation company in Slovakia, with total installed
generation capacity of 6,900 MW. Closing of the
transaction, which is subject to certain conditions, is expected
by the end of 2005. In addition, we have entered into a
non-binding memorandum of understanding with EDF for an
industrial partnership permitting us to invest in the French
electricity market, including in the field of nuclear power
generation. Please see “Item 4. Information on the
Company — Business — The Enel
Group — Generation and Energy Management —
International Generation.”
We intend to focus on our core electricity and gas activities.
In May 2005, we entered into an agreement for the sale of Wind
to Weather in a series of transactions that we expect ultimately
to lead to our exit from
89
the telecommunications business (please see “Item 4.
Information on the Company — Business — The
Enel Group — Telecommunications”). In addition,
in May 2005, we agreed to sell a 29.99% stake in Terna to Cassa
Depositi e Prestiti, and, as a result, we expect to reduce our
stake in Terna to approximately 5%, and, accordingly, to
deconsolidate Terna during 2005 (please see “Item 4.
Information on the Company — Business —
Overview — Transmission”).
You should read the sections “Strategy” and “The
Enel Group” in “Item 4. Information on the
Company — Business,”“Item 4.
Information on the Company — Regulatory Matters”
and “Item 3. Key Information — Risk
Factors” for a more detailed discussion of our strategy and
other matters affecting our business.
Management expects that, net of the positive impact of revenues
recorded in 2004 in respect of stranded costs we are to recover
for the period from 2000 to 2003, our consolidated operating
income and net income for 2005 will be higher than the results
recorded in 2004.
Acquisition of Infostrada and Sole Ownership of
Wind
In 2001 we acquired Infostrada, a provider of fixed line
telecommunication services, that we subsequently merged into
Wind. In 2003, we acquired the stake in Wind held by France
Télécom, and became Wind’s sole shareholder.
These transactions gave rise to goodwill that represented
approximately 92% of the total goodwill related to our
Telecommunications segment at December 31, 2004, which was
equal to
€5,089 million.
On March 29, 2001, Enel Investment Holding BV, a Dutch
company wholly owned by us, acquired from Mannesman Investment
BV (an indirect, wholly owned subsidiary of Vodafone Group plc)
100% of the capital stock of Infostrada, one of Italy’s
leading alternative providers of fixed line telecommunications
services and the owner and operator of one of Italy’s
leading Internet portals. The purchase price for the shares,
amounting to
€7,250 million,
was paid in full on the same date. As provided for in the share
purchase agreement, Mannesman Investment BV was also repaid by
us
€132 million
representing a receivable against Infostrada that Mannesman
Investment BV had previously renounced in favor of Infostrada.
Moreover, on the same date, Enel Investment Holding BV paid
Vodafone
€821.2 million
due to Vodafone by Infostrada and became a creditor of
Infostrada for the same amount. We also incurred certain
ancillary costs in connection with the acquisition amounting to
€372 million.
We originally financed our acquisition of Infostrada with funds
that we obtained under a
€10,000 million
revolving credit facility that we entered into with a pool of
banks in November 2000 and transferred to Enel Investment
Holding BV through an intercompany loan. In June 2001, Enel
Investment Holding BV refinanced a portion of this debt through
the issuance of
€2,000 million
in medium term notes with a maturity of three years (please see
“— Liquidity and Capital Resources —
Capital resources”). We merged Infostrada into Wind
effective January 2002 and integrated the operations of
Infostrada and Wind.
Our acquisition of Infostrada has had a significant effect on
our financial condition and results of operations, primarily as
a result of the amortization of goodwill arising from the
transaction and the debt incurred in order to finance the
acquisition. The purchase price of
€7,250 million,
and the
€132 million
paid to Mannesman Investment BV at the time of the acquisition,
are approximately
€7,256 million
greater than the consolidated net book value of Infostrada as of
March 31, 2001, thus giving rise to an equivalent amount of
goodwill as of such date. In addition, in connection with the
acquisition, we incurred certain ancillary costs amounting to
€372 million,
which increased the goodwill associated with our purchase of
Infostrada to
€7,631 million.
In July 2003, we acquired France Télécom’s 26.6%
stake in Wind for a purchase price of
€1,330 million.
We also reimbursed France Télécom for a capital
contribution of
€59 million
it had made to Wind. The acquisition of France
Télécom’s stake gave rise to an amount of
goodwill equivalent, as of its date, to
€1,411 million,
corresponding to the difference between the total of the
purchase price and other costs incurred and a negative net book
value of
€22 million.
You should read note 7 to our consolidated financial
statements for a description of the other relatively minor
elements contributing to the total goodwill related to our
Telecommunications segment.
90
Under Italian GAAP, which we applied in the preparation of our
financial statements through December 31, 2004, we had to
amortize each portion of this goodwill over a period of
15 years starting from the date on which the first portion
arose. At December 31, 2004, we had amortized an aggregate
of
€2,060 million
of this goodwill. In 2002, we wrote-down
€1,511 million
in the carrying value of this goodwill, reflecting a downward
revision of our expectations of growth of the telecommunications
sector and applying a discounted cash flow approach. In 2004, we
wrote down an additional
€1,116 million
in the carrying value of this goodwill, reflecting the value
attributed to our holding in Wind that was implied by the
binding offer we received from Weather Investments in April
2005. In May 2005, we entered into an agreement to sell Wind to
Weather in a multi-step transaction (please see
“Item 4. Information on the Company —
Business — Overview —
Telecommunications”). For further detail on the treatment
of the goodwill associated with our purchase of Infostrada and
France Télécom’s stake in Wind, please see
note 7 to our consolidated financial statements for a
discussion of treatment under Italian GAAP and note 24 to
our consolidated financial statements for a discussion of the
difference in the treatment of this goodwill under Italian GAAP
and U.S. GAAP.
Under IFRS, the international financial reporting standards we
have adopted in the preparation of our consolidated financial
statements from January 1, 2005, this goodwill may no
longer be amortized but is to be subjected to annual impairment
tests, comparing the carrying amount to the related market
value. As a result, for as long as we hold an interest in Wind,
changes in the market value of this goodwill will have an effect
on our financial condition and results of operations. Please see
“— Process of Transition to International
Financial Reporting Standards” for more details on our
adoption of IFRS and the related impact in the treatment of the
goodwill related to our Telecommunication segment.
Analysis of Operating Results
The following table shows certain financial data for the years
ended December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004, expressed in each
case as a percentage of our operating revenues:
Tariff revenues from sales on the regulated market and transport
of electricity on our distribution network
16,740
15,444
Sales to regulatory entities, sales on the free market and sales
on foreign markets(1)
3,094
9,720
Equalization Fund contributions
179
17
Total revenues from electricity sales
20,013
25,181
Telecommunications services
3,959
4,168
Gas sales to end users
1,254
1,374
Fees for customer connections, inspections and repositioning
services
684
675
Other revenues(2)
5,407
5,091
Total operating revenues
31,317
36,489
(1)
“Sales to regulatory entities” includes sales to the
Gestore della Rete, the Single Buyer (since April 1, 2004)
and the Gestore del Mercato (or Market Operator). While sales to
third-party resellers of electricity on the free market are
included in “Sales on the free market”, this line item
does not include revenues from sales to resellers purchasing
electricity for distribution on the regulated market. Since
April 1, 2004, these resellers have been required to
purchase electricity directly from the Single Buyer. Revenues
received prior to that date from resellers purchasing
electricity for distribution on the regulated market were
recorded in the line item “Tariff revenues from sales on
the regulated market and transport of electricity on our
distribution network.”
(2)
“Other revenues” mainly includes our revenues from
sales of fuel (including natural gas) to third parties, revenues
of our Transmission division, engineering and contracting
activities, and non-recurring items such as reversals of
provisions, bonus payments and reimbursements.
Our consolidated operating revenues for 2004 increased by
€5,172 million,
or 16.5%, compared to 2003. As explained in more detail below,
this improvement was almost entirely due to the
€5,168 million,
or 25.8%, increase in our consolidated revenues from sales of
electricity. In addition, revenues from telecommunications
services increased by
€209 million,
or 5.3%, and revenues from gas sold to end users increased by
€120 million,
or 9.6%. The impact of these factors on our overall operating
revenues was partially offset by a decrease of
€316 million,
or 5.8%, in revenues from other activities and a slight decrease
of
€9 million,
or 1.3%, in revenues from fees for customer connections,
inspections and repositioning services.
Electricity sales
In 2004, total revenues from electricity sales increased by
€5,168 million,
or 25.8%, as compared to 2003.
The increase was primarily due to higher sales to regulatory
entities, sales on the free market and sales on foreign markets,
which more than tripled, increasing by
€6,626 million,
reflecting primarily the start of operation of the Italian power
exchange and of the Single Buyer. The increase compared to 2003
also reflected
€627 million
of revenues from sales on the ancillary service market (which
started operation in April 2004), an increase of
€508 million,
or 40.8%, in revenues from sales on the free market in Italy
(which mainly reflected increases in volumes sold to end users
with annual consumption in excess of 100 GWh per year), and an
increase of
€283 million,
or 29.1%, in revenues from international sales of electricity
(comprising a
€172 million
increase in revenues from international trading of electricity,
which more than tripled, a
€53 million
increase in revenues attributable to the first-time
consolidation of EUFR as of January 2004, a
€45 million,
or 12.8%, increase in sales in the Spanish market by our Sales,
Infrastructure and Networks
92
segment, and a
€10 million
increase in revenues attributable to the first-time contribution
of a full year of revenues from Maritza, which was consolidated
in April 2003).
The impact of this significant increase in sales to regulatory
entities, sales on the free market and sales on foreign markets
was offset in part by a
€1,296 million,
or 7.7%, decrease in revenues from sales on the regulated market
and transport of electricity on our distribution network, which
was attributable to the combination of lower sales volumes (due
to the fact that the on-going liberalization of the electricity
market resulted in more customers being eligible to access the
free market and the fact that since April 1, 2004,
third-party resellers that distribute electricity on the
regulated market purchase electricity directly from the Single
Buyer rather than from us), and the negative impact of the new
tariff mechanism for the 2004-2007 period, which took effect on
February 1, 2004. Please see “Item 4. Information
on the Company — Regulatory Matters —
Electricity Regulation — Tariff Structure”. The
impact of these negative factors on our revenues from sales on
the regulated market and transport of electricity on our
distribution network was partially offset by
€231 million
in revenues recorded in connection with the new price equalizing
mechanism put in place by the Energy Authority in connection
with the start of operations of the Single Buyer (see above
“— Comparability of
information — Regulatory and Other
Developments”); and the positive revenue effect of
refinements of the method we use to estimate, and recognize
revenues from, the amount of electricity we have delivered but
not yet billed for a given period.
Reimbursements received from the Equalization Fund decreased by
€162 million,
primarily as a result of the fact that in 2003 we had received
€102 million
related to the reimbursement of certain charges incurred in 2002
for the purchase of green certificates and incentive payments
for CIP 6 electricity production related to previous years of
€68 million.
Please see “Item 4. Information on the
Company — Regulatory Matters — System
Charges and Other Charges” and “Item 4.
Information on the Company — Regulatory
Matters — Promotion of Renewable Resources” for a
description of the Equalization Fund and the CIP 6 system,
respectively.
Telecommunications services
Revenues from telecommunications services increased by
€209 million,
or 5.3%, primarily due to an increase of
€242 million,
or 11.1%, in revenues from the sale of mobile services and a
€66 million
increase in revenues from our Greek operations (which more than
doubled), offset in part by a decrease in revenues from fixed
telephone and Internet services of
€75 million,
or 4.8%.
Gas sales to end users
Our revenues from sales of natural gas to end users (which
exclude sales of gas to distributors and to other third parties
by Enel Trade, which are recorded in “Other revenues”)
increased by
€120 million,
or 9.6%, largely due to the 16.7% increase in the quantity of
natural gas sold by our Sales, Infrastructure and Networks
segment, which rose from 4,445 million cubic meters in 2003
to 5,186 million cubic meters in 2004, as well as the
first-time consolidation of the Sicilmetano Group (from January
2004) and the Ottogas Group (from October 2004), which generated
revenues of
€20 million
and
€4 million,
respectively, during the year.
Fees for customer connections, inspections and repositioning
services
Revenues from fees for customer connections, inspections and
repositioning services decreased slightly, by
€9 million,
or 1.3%, from 2003.
Other revenues
Other revenues decreased by
€316 million,
or 5.8%, primarily due to a decline of
€705 million,
or 44.0%, in revenues from sales of fuel to third parties,
largely as a result of the expiration of supply contracts
between Enel Trade and our former Gencos Eurogen (now Edipower)
and Interpower (now Tirreno Power). The decrease in other
revenues also reflected the combined effect of a decrease of
€641 million,
or 51.6%, in revenues from sales of engineering and contracting
services to third parties as a result of the completion of
certain foreign projects and the shift in focus of our
engineering and contracting activities to projects for the
Group, the fact that in 2003 other revenues had included
€410 million
related to the reversal of the hydroelectric surcharge that we
had accounted for in 2002, and a
€59 million
decrease in revenues attributable
93
to our divestiture of the waste management operations of the
Aimeri Group in February 2004. The negative impact of these
factors on the overall result was offset in part by
€1,219 million
in revenues we recorded on the basis of the European
Commission’s approval of the decree issued in August 2004
by the MEF and the Ministry of Productive Activities setting the
overall amount of stranded costs we are entitled to recover
(please see “— Comparability of
Information — Regulatory and Other Developments”
and “Item 4 — Regulatory Matters —
Electricity Regulation — The Tariff
Structure — Stranded costs”), the reversal of a
€194 million
provision related to the turnover contribution imposed by the
Italian government that the European Court of Justice declared
incompatible with EU regulations in June 2004, and an increase
of
€103 million
in revenues recorded in connection with the bonus payments
scheme for continuity and quality of service related to our
performance in 2003 and 2004.
The following table shows operating revenues for each of our
business segments for the periods presented. In 2004, we
eliminated the reportable segment corresponding to our
international division (please see
“— Overview — Business Segments”).
Accordingly, in order to present segment information for the
periods presented on a comparable basis, we have reclassified
certain segment information for 2003 to conform to the 2004
presentation.
In 2004, the operating revenues of our Generation and Energy
Management segment, prior to intersegment eliminations,
increased by
€375 million,
or 3.0%, as compared to 2003. The total revenues of the segment
of
€12,982 million
comprised revenues from its Italian operations of
€12,397 million,
revenues from its international operations of
€623 million
and eliminations for intrasegment sales of
€38 million,
which mainly related to sales of fuel by Enel Trade to our
international generation companies. The overall increase in the
segment’s revenues was primarily attributable to a
€286 million,
or 2.4%, increase, in revenues from the segment’s
operations in Italy prior to intrasegment eliminations, and a
€105 million,
or 20.3%, increase, prior to intrasegment eliminations, in
revenues from international operations.
The increase in revenues from Italian activities primarily
reflected
€664 million
in revenues that we recorded following the European
Commission’s approval of the August 2004 decree on stranded
costs. Of this total,
€513 million
related to costs we incurred for our generation plants during
the period 2000-2003, and
€151 million
related to reimbursements of costs we incurred in 2004 related
to our Nigerian LNG contract. The increase in revenues from
domestic operations also reflected a
€541 million
increase in revenues from electricity sales by Enel Trade
(primarily to third parties); an increase of
€275 million
attributable to the net effects of the start of the ancillary
service market (on which we receive capacity payments) and a
decline in revenues earned by our generation companies from
electricity sales (reflecting lower sales volumes) and a
€87 million
increase in sales by Enel Trade of natural gas to our Sales,
Infrastructure and Networks segment. The positive effects of
these factors on the segment’s Italian revenues were only
partially offset by a decline of
€705 million
in revenues from sales of fuel to third parties (largely as a
result of the expiration of supply contracts with our former
Gencos noted above). In addition, Italian revenues in 2003 had
included a number of non-recurring items noted above, including
€410 million
related to the reversal of the hydroelectric surcharge that we
had accounted for as a cost in 2002,
€102 million
related to the reimbursement of certain
94
charges incurred in 2002 for the purchase of green certificates,
and
€68 million
in incentive payments from the Equalization Fund for CIP 6
electricity production related to previous years.
The
€105 million
increase in revenues from international operations prior to
intrasegment eliminations reflected the first time consolidation
of EUFR (which accounted for
€56 million
of the increase), increased revenues at the generation
activities of Viesgo (which accounted for
€31 million
of the increase) and the first-time full year consolidation of
Maritza (which accounted for
€10 million
of the increase).
Sales, Infrastructure and Networks
The operating revenues of our Sales, Infrastructure and Networks
segment, prior to intersegment eliminations, decreased by
€967 million,
or 4.7%, as compared to 2003. The total revenues of the segment
of
€19,466 million
comprised revenues from Italian electricity distribution and
sales of
€17,619 million,
revenues from gas distribution and sales of
€1,421 million,
revenues from the segment’s international electricity
operations of
€433 million
and eliminations for intrasegment sales of
€7 million.
The overall decrease in the segment’s revenues was
primarily attributable to a decline of
€1,054 million,
or 5.6%, in revenues, prior to intrasegment eliminations, from
electricity distribution and sales in Italy, offset only
partially by a
€47 million,
or 12.2%, increase in revenues, prior to intrasegment
eliminations, from sales of electricity by the segment’s
international operations and a
€47 million,
or 3.4%, increase in revenues, prior to intrasegment
eliminations, from gas distribution and sales.
The decline in Italian electricity revenues reflected a
€1,438 million
decrease in revenues from sales to the regulated market and from
transport of electricity on our network, comprised of a
€739 million
decline in sales to end users (reflecting the increased number
of customers eligible to participate on the free market) and a
€699 million
decline in sales to resellers purchasing electricity for
distribution on the regulated market (reflecting the factors
described above). The decline also reflected a
€13 million
decrease in revenues from franchising and a
€6 million
decrease in revenues from public lighting activities. These
negative factors were partially offset by
€231 million
in revenues recorded in connection with the new price equalizing
mechanism put in place in January 2004 to compensate
distributors for eventual differences between the price for
electricity paid to the Single Buyer and the tariff the
distributor charges end users on the regulated market (please
see (“ — Comparability of Information —
Regulatory and Other Developments”); and a
€120 million
increase in revenues generated from sales on the free market as
a result of both a higher volume of electricity sold on the free
market and higher average prices. The segment’s results
from Italian operations also reflected the fact that in 2004 we
recorded revenues in connection with the bonus scheme for
continuity and quality of service performance of
€205 million,
with respect to service provided in 2003 and
€45 million
of additional revenues relating to the bonus payment that we
estimate we will receive with respect to service provided in
2004 following the introduction of a new mechanism to calculate
bonuses for continuity and quality of service (the total bonus
payment recorded in 2003, with respect to services provided in
2001 and 2002, was
€147 million)
(please see “— Regulatory Matters —
Electricity Regulation — The Tariff Structure”
for a more detailed discussion of this mechanism.).
The
€47 million
increase in revenues from sales of electricity by our
international operations was primarily attributable to increased
sales volumes, as well as the consolidation effects noted above.
The
€47 million
increase in revenues from gas activities was mainly attributable
to a
€120 million
increase in revenues from gas sales, reflecting both increased
sales volumes at our existing operations and the first time
consolidation of Sicilmetano
(€20 million)
and Ottogas
(€4 million).
These positive factors were offset in part by a
€73 million
decrease in other revenues from gas activities primarily
reflecting a
€59 million
decrease resulting from the divestiture of the Aimeri Group in
February 2004.
Transmission
The operating revenues of our Transmission segment, prior to
intersegment eliminations, increased by
€96 million,
or 10.4%, as compared to 2003, primarily due to an increase of
€66 million
in revenues generated by this segment’s activity in Brazil.
The increase was also due to a
€29 million
increase in revenues at the segment’s Italian operations
reflecting the net impact of a
€50 million
increase attributable to the new tariffs in place for the
2004-2007 period, which enable Terna to recover a higher return
on capital invested in network
95
improvements and a
€21 million
decrease due to the reduction in percentage of the national grid
attributable to us, following the re-calculation of such
percentage made by the Gestore della Rete at the end of 2004,
which reduction had a parallel effect on our tariff revenues.
Telecommunications
The operating revenues of our Telecommunications segment, prior
to intersegment eliminations, increased by
€331 million,
or 7.6%, as compared to 2003. The increase was primarily
attributable to an increase of
€242 million,
or 11.1%, in revenues from the sale of mobile services
(excluding revenues from sales to other Group companies), the
reversal of a
€194 million
provision related to the turnover contribution imposed by the
Italian government that the European Court of Justice declared
incompatible with EU regulations in June 2004 and a
€66 million
increase in revenues from our Greek operations (which more than
doubled). The positive impact of these factors was offset only
partially by a decrease of
€75 million,
or 4.8%, in revenues from fixed-line and internet services in
Italy (excluding revenues from sales to other Group companies)
due to a combination of a decrease in traffic volumes, the fact
that revenues in 2003 were boosted by a one-time gain of
€30 million
relating to the reassessment of interconnection charges
accounted for in 2002, and the fact that the segment’s
revenues resulting from the reassessment of costs for services
from other operators that had been estimated and recorded in
previous years were
€54 million
in 2003 and only
€16 million
in 2004.
Corporate
The operating revenues of our Corporate segment, prior to
intersegment eliminations, increased by
€478 million,
or 42.0%, as compared to 2003. The increase primarily reflected
our recording of
€555 million
in revenues corresponding to the amount of reimbursement we are
entitled to receive in relation to costs we incurred in the
period 2000-2003 related to the Nigerian LNG contract following
the approval of decree about stranded costs mentioned above.
This positive factor was only partially offset by a decline of
€98 million,
or 11.3%, in revenues from sales of electricity (mainly relating
to a decrease in revenues from sales of imported electricity,
reflecting the decline in the amount of electricity imported and
sold), as well as lower average sales prices (which declined by
5.2%).
Services and Other Activities
The operating revenues of our Services and Other Activities
segment, prior to intersegment eliminations, decreased by
€943 million,
or 34.4%, as compared to 2003. Of the segment’s total of
€1,799 million
in operating revenues, prior to intersegment eliminations,
€953 million
were attributable to engineering and contracting,
€409 million
to information technology services,
€290 million
to real estate and related services, and
€208 million
to other activities. Approximately 58% of these revenues were
generated by transactions with other Group companies in 2004, as
compared to 45% in 2003. Eliminations for intrasegment
operations in 2004 were
€61 million.
The decrease in revenues from this segment’s operations was
primarily due to a
€741 million
decrease in revenues, prior to intrasegment eliminations, from
our engineering and contracting activities reflecting the
completion of certain foreign projects and the shift in focus to
work on projects for other Group companies. These factors were
reflected in the unit’s order backlog, which at
December 31, 2004, comprised
€1,983 million
in orders from other Group companies and
€317 million
in orders from third parties, as compared to
€437 million
and
€892 million,
respectively, at January 1, 2004. Other negative factors
included a decline of
€107 million
in revenues, prior to intrasegment eliminations, from real
estate and related activities, reflecting mainly the
renegotiation of certain lease contracts with other Group
companies as of January 1, 2004, as well as the sale of
NewReal; and a decline of
€53 million
in revenues, prior to intrasegment eliminations, from our
information technology services unit, primarily reflecting the
transfer, as of July 1, 2003, of its fiber optic backbone
(which had contributed
€31 million
in revenue in 2003) to Enel.net (then one of the division’s
other activities, and subsequently transferred to Wind, as of
March, 2004) and lower revenues from sales to third parties
(which accounted for
€14 million
of the decrease). The overall decline also reflected a
€51 million
decline in revenues, prior to intrasegment eliminations, from
our other activities, including mainly personnel administration,
professional training services, factoring and water operations.
96
Eliminations
Eliminations in operating revenues primarily relate to
intersegment sales (primarily of electricity and fuel) and
services (primarily engineering and contracting). In 2004,
eliminations decreased by
€5,802 million,
or 53.2%, as compared to 2003, mainly reflecting the fact that
sales of electricity on the regulated market were made by our
Generation and Energy Management segment directly to our Sales,
Infrastructure and Network segment during 2003, whereas such
sales were made to Single Buyer starting from April 1, 2004.
Operating Expenses
The following table shows a breakdown of our operating expenses
for each of the periods presented:
As described in more detail below, our consolidated operating
expenses for 2004 increased by
€3,922 million,
or 17.8%, as compared to 2003. Expressed as a percentage of
operating revenues, operating expenses were 71.2% in 2004, as
compared with 70.5% in 2003. The increase in the absolute figure
was primarily due to an increase in our expenses for purchased
power, which more than doubled to
€10,465 million,
reflecting the introduction of the Italian power exchange from
April 1, 2004. The overall increase also reflected a
€112 million
increase in costs for services and rentals. These increases were
offset in part by declines of
€1,039 million
in costs for materials and supplies,
€503 million
in costs for fuel for thermal generation,
€208 million
in other costs,
€125 million
in personnel costs,
€81 million
in provisions, and by an increase of
€79 million
in capitalized expenses.
Personnel
Personnel costs decreased by
€125 million,
or 3.6%, as compared to 2003, primarily due to a 7.4% (or 4,985
person) decline in the average number of employees during the
period. Average costs per employee, however, increased by 4.1%,
primarily as a result of increases in the variable component of
executive compensation, including bonuses and other incentives.
Fuel for thermal generation
Costs for fuel for thermal generation decreased by
€503 million,
or 12.3%, as compared to 2003, primarily reflecting a 13.9%
decrease in the volume of electricity we produced from thermal
sources in Italy, which effect was partially offset by an
increase in the average price of fuel. In addition, we recorded
a total of
€24 million
in increased fuel expenses as a result of the first time full
year consolidation of Maritza, and the first time consolidation
of EUFR (which uses fuel in its cogeneration plants).
Purchased power
Purchased power costs more than doubled, increasing by
€5,845 million,
as the quantity of power purchased increased by 107.1%. The
sharp increase was primarily attributable to the introduction of
the Italian power exchange on April 1, 2004, following
which our distribution companies purchase power for sales on the
97
regulated market exclusively from the Single Buyer, rather than
directly from our generation companies, and our generation
companies purchase from third parties the electricity they use
to power pumping at our hydroelectric plants.
Services and rentals
Services and rentals costs increased by
€112 million,
or 2.1%, primarily due to an increase of
€157 million
in fees paid by us to transport electricity and gas on
third-party networks, a
€66 million
increase in advertising costs that were incurred primarily by
Wind and in connection with the Italian retail offerings of
Enel’s shares in October 2004 and of Terna’s shares in
June 2004, and an increase of
€43 million
in rental costs, mainly reflecting the disposal of NewReal from
which we continue to lease certain real estate assets. The
impact of these factors on the overall total was offset in part
by a
€95 million
decrease in costs related to our engineering and contracting
activities (reflecting reduced activities) and a
€35 million
decrease in interconnection fees payable to other
telecommunications providers, mainly as a result of the
development of Wind’s network and lower prices for roaming
and interconnection services.
Materials and supplies
Materials and supplies costs decreased by
€1,039 million,
or 25.3%, as compared to 2003. Costs for fuel for supply to
third parties fell by
€660 million
due to the lower level of such sales (largely as a result of the
expiration of supply contracts with two of our former Gencos),
while materials costs fell by
€478 million,
primarily due to the lower level of activity for third parties
of our engineering and contracting unit. The impact of these
decreases on the overall figure was partially offset by an
increase of
€99 million
in costs for gas purchased for resale to end users, reflecting
the increase in the volume of such sales.
Provisions
Provisions decreased by
€81 million,
or 13.7%, as compared to 2003. Provisions at our Generation and
Energy Management segment decreased by
€133 million,
reflecting a
€13 million
decline in provisions for charges related to our generation
plants, and the fact the total for 2003 had included
€57 million
for risks of additional hydroelectric surcharges related to
electricity produced in 2001 and
€38 million
for risks on fuel trading and other contracts. The overall
decline also reflected a
€27 million
decrease in accruals for risks and charges in our Transmission
segment, primarily reflecting the fact that, in 2003, Terna had
added
€33 million
in provisions related to the reduction in the portion of tariffs
it was entitled to after the re-calculation of its percentage of
the national grid. These factors were partially offset by an
increase of
€66 million
in the Telecommunications segment (comprising
€97 million
in additional write-downs of receivables following a review of
the risk profile of its receivables portfolio and a
€21 million
increase in accruals for risks relating to pending litigation,
partially offset by a
€45 million
decrease in accruals as a result of the finding by the European
Court of Justice that the turnover contribution was incompatible
with European law); and an aggregate increase of
€13 million
in provisions recorded by our other business segments.
Other costs
Other costs decreased by
€208 million,
or 22.5%, as compared to 2003, in part as a result of a
€97 million
decrease in system charges payable by Enel Distribuzione, the
lead company of our Sales, Network and Infrastructure segment,
as a result of the fact that certain of these charges, starting
in 2004, are paid directly to the Equalization Fund rather than
through distributors. Previously, we received payment of these
charges through a component of the tariff mechanism, recorded
then as revenues and then paid the amounts so received from
customers to the Equalization Fund, which payment was then
recorded as an operating cost for the same amount. We also
recorded a
€30 million
decrease in costs for the purchase of “green
certificates,” and a
€30 million
decline attributable to the fact that the figure for 2003
included certain costs related to the settlement of a dispute
over a contract for the construction of a plant in Libya. The
overall decline in other costs also reflected the elimination of
the requirement that we refund to the Equalization Fund a
portion of our margin on sales of imported electricity when the
margin exceeded certain levels (which requirement had resulted
in costs of
€20 million
in 2003).
98
Capitalized expenses
Capitalized expenses increased by
€79 million,
or 8.4%, as compared to 2003, primarily reflecting higher levels
of construction activity in our Sales, Infrastructure and
Networks segment.
The following table shows a breakdown of our operating expenses
by business segment for each of the periods presented.
In 2004, the operating expenses of our Generation and Energy
Management segment (which primarily consist of costs for
purchased power, fuel costs, fees paid to the Gestore della
Rete, and personnel and maintenance costs for our power plants),
increased by
€106 million,
or 1.2%, prior to intersegment eliminations, as compared to
2003. The segment’s total operating expenses of
€9,054 million
comprised expenses for Italian generation of
€8,700 million,
expenses for international generation of
€392 million
and eliminations for intrasegment operations of
€38 million.
The overall increase was attributable to a
€64 million,
or 19.5%, increase, prior to intrasegment eliminations, in
expenses for international operations and a
€58 million,
or 0.7%, increase, prior to intrasegment eliminations, in
expenses for the segment’s Italian operations
(notwithstanding significant changes in the components of these
costs).
The increase at the segment’s Italian operations was
attributable mainly to the
€1,276 million
increase in costs for purchased power, which more than doubled,
as noted above. This factor was largely offset by a
€543 million,
or 22.0%, decrease in costs for materials and supplies (mainly
reflecting lower purchases of fuel for trading), a
€529 million,
or 13.4%, decrease in costs for fuel for thermal generation
(reflecting lower volumes of electricity generated), a
€119 million,
or 65.0%, decrease in provisions (primarily reflecting the
factors described above), and a
€20 million,
or 3.3%, decrease in the segment’s costs for personnel.
The increase in expenses for the segment’s international
generation operations was primarily attributable to a
€37 million,
or 18.0%, increase in expenses at Viesgo Generaciòn, the
first time consolidation of EUFR
(€24 million),
and the first-time full year consolidation of Maritza
(€8 million).
Sales, Infrastructure and Networks
In 2004, the operating expenses of our Sales, Infrastructure and
Networks segment (which primarily consist of purchases of power
and natural gas and costs associated with running our
distribution network), prior to intersegment eliminations,
decreased by
€1,126 million,
or 6.7%, as compared to 2003. The segment’s total operating
expenses of
€15,744 million
comprised expenses of Italian electricity activities of
€14,213 million,
expenses of gas distribution and sales of
€1,168 million,
expenses of the segment’s international electricity
operations of
€370 million
and eliminations for intrasegment operations of
€7 million.
The overall decrease in the segment’s expenses was
primarily attributable to a decline of
€1,208 million,
or 7.8%, in expenses, prior to intrasegment eliminations, for
electricity activities in Italy, offset only in part by a
€48 million,
or 14.9%, increase in expenses, prior to intrasegment
eliminations, for the segment’s international operations
and a
€41 million,
or 3.6%, increase in expenses, prior to intrasegment
eliminations, for gas activities.
99
The decrease in expenses for electricity activities in Italy
primarily reflected a decline of
€1,058 million,
or 9.6%, in costs for purchased power (largely due to lower
volumes purchased for the regulated market); a
€97 million
decrease in system charges payable by Enel Distribuzione, as
explained above; and decreases in Enel Distribuzione’s
costs for personnel
(€57 million),
services and rentals
(€26 million)
and other costs
(€16 million).
These factors were partially offset by a
€27 million
increase in costs for materials and supplies that reflected an
increased level of construction on our Italian electricity
distribution network.
The increase in expenses at the segment’s international
operations was primarily attributable to a
€31 million
increase in costs for purchased power (reflecting increased
volumes).
The increase in expenses for gas activities was primarily
attributable to a
€94 million
increase in costs for gas purchased for resale to end users,
reflecting the increase in the volume of sales, offset in part
by a
€29 million
decrease in personnel costs (primarily reflecting the sale of
waste management activities that had been acquired with certain
gas companies) and a
€12 million
decline in provisions.
Transmission
In 2004, the operating expenses for our Transmission segment,
prior to intersegment eliminations, increased by
€7 million,
or 2.0%, as compared to 2003. This increase was primarily
attributable to an increase in other costs of
€23 million,
€15 million
of which related to the lower fees we were entitled to in 2002
and 2003, as a result of the lower percentage of the national
grid we own, and for which we had not accounted for accruals in
2003. The increase also reflected an
€11 million
increase in costs for services and rentals largely reflecting
costs incurred with respect to the Terna IPO. These factors were
offset in part by the
€27 million
decrease in provisions at this segment noted above.
Telecommunications
In 2004, the operating expenses for our Telecommunications
segment, prior to intersegment eliminations, decreased by
€147 million,
or 4.2%, as compared to 2003. This decrease was primarily
attributable to the transfer to Wind, as of March 1, 2004,
of the share capital of Enel.net, which owns the fiber optic
backbone rented by Wind (we estimate that this factor accounted
for
€118 million
of the decrease). The decline in this segment’s costs also
reflected the
€35 million
decrease in fees payable to other telecommunications providers
noted above, and a
€28 million
decrease in costs for materials. These positive factors were
partially offset by the
€66 million
increase in this segment’s provisions described above.
Corporate
In 2004, the operating expenses for our Corporate segment, prior
to intersegment eliminations, increased by
€47 million,
or 5.2%, as compared to 2003, primarily due to a
€42 million
increase in this segment’s provisions (mainly reflecting
€31 million
related to our appeal against the Energy Authority’s
decision to apply congestion fees in connection with our
long-term electricity import contracts (please see
“Item 8. Financial Information — Other
Financial Information — Legal Proceedings”), and
a
€38 million
increase attributable to costs incurred in connection with the
Italian retail offerings of Enel’s shares in October 2004
and of Terna’s shares in June 2004. These factors were
offset in part by a
€31 million
decrease in expenses for imported electricity reflecting a
decline in the volume of imported electricity, the impact of
which was offset in part by a 1.5% increase in the average unit
price.
Services and Other Activities
In 2004, the operating expenses of our Services and Other
Activities segment, prior to intersegment eliminations,
decreased by
€781 million,
or 33.6%, as compared to 2003, primarily reflecting a
€713 million
decrease in costs at our engineering and contracting operations,
reflecting their reduced activities. The overall decline in this
segment’s expenses also reflected a
€29 million
decrease at our real estate and related activities, reflecting
the sale of NewReal and reduced activity at the other real
estate companies, and a
€17 million
decrease at our information technology activities. Operating
expenses for other activities (such as personnel administration,
professional training services, factoring and water activities)
decreased by
€31 million.
Eliminations for intrasegment operations in 2004 were
€61 million.
100
Eliminations
Eliminations for operating expenses principally consist of the
elimination of intersegment electricity and fuel purchases and
costs for the provision of intersegment services. In 2004, the
decrease in eliminations of
€5,816 million,
or 53.7%, as compared to 2003, mainly reflected the fact that
since the introduction of the Single Buyer in April 2004, our
Sales, Infrastructure and Network segment purchases most of the
electricity it sells directly from the Single Buyer rather than
from our Generation and Energy Management segment.
Depreciation and Amortization
The following table shows depreciation and amortization expenses
for each of our business segments for each of the periods
presented:
Depreciation and amortization expenses in 2004 decreased by
€343 million,
or 7.6%, as compared to 2003, mainly as a result of a
€397 million
decrease in such expenses at our Sales, Infrastructure and
Network segment that was primarily due to a
€389 million
decrease related to the Italian electricity operations of the
segment, reflecting a
€518 million
decrease arising from the upward revision of our estimates of
the useful lives of certain assets, as described in
“Overview — Comparability of
Information — Regulatory and Other Developments”
above (see also “— Critical Accounting
Policies”), which was in part offset by an increase of
€129 million
in depreciation and amortization expenses primarily related to
investments in the distribution network. Overall depreciation
and amortization expenses also reflected an increase of
€94 million
in expenses at our Telecommunications segment, of which
€55 million
was attributable to the amortization of the portion of the
goodwill arising out of our acquisition of France
Télécom’s stake in Wind, and
€39 million
related to the depreciation of new assets acquired in connection
with the development of Wind’s network. As shown in the
table above, depreciation and amortization expenses at our other
segments decreased in the aggregate by
€40 million.
Operating Income
The following table shows operating income for each of our
business segments for the periods presented:
Operating income increased by
€1,593 million,
or 33.7%, as compared to 2003, reflecting increases in the
operating income earned by our Sales, Infrastructure and
Networks, Corporate, Generation and Energy
101
Management and Transmission segments, and a narrowing of the
operating loss at our Telecommunications segment, which were
offset in part by a decrease in the operating income earned by
our Services and Other Activities segment.
Generation and Energy Management
The operating income of our Generation and Energy Management
segment, prior to intersegment eliminations, increased by
€241 million,
or 9.8%, as compared to 2003. The segment’s operating
income was comprised of operating income from Italian generation
operations of
€2,639 million
and operating income from international operations of
€59 million.
The overall increase in the segment’s operating income
reflected a
€251 million,
or 10.5%, increase in operating income from its Italian
generation operations that was offset in part by a
€10 million,
or 14.5%, decrease in operating income from its international
generation operations.
The increase in operating income from Italian generation
activities primarily reflected the
€664 million
that the segment is entitled to recover for stranded costs, as
explained above. The increase in operating income also reflected
the effect of lower provisions, which declined by
€119 million
due to the factors explained above. The impact of these factors
was offset in part by the fact that, in 2003, this
segment’s operating revenues were boosted by the
non-recurring items described above relating to the reversal of
the hydroelectric surcharge
(€410 million),
the reimbursement of certain charges incurred for the purchase
of green certificates in 2002
(€102 million),
and incentive payments for CIP 6 electricity production related
to previous years
(€68 million).
The decrease in operating income generated by the international
generation operations of the segment was primarily attributable
to a
€33 million
decrease at Viesgo (reflecting primarily a
€26 million
increase in depreciation and amortization expenses), which was
offset in part by a
€11 million
increase reflecting the first time consolidation of EUFR, and a
€11 million
increase in operating income from the segment’s operations
in North America and Central and South America.
Sales, Infrastructure and Networks
The operating income of our Sales, Infrastructure and Networks
segment, prior to intersegment eliminations, increased by
€556 million,
or 23.9%, as compared to 2003. Total operating income of the
segment comprised
€2,724 million
of operating income from Italian electricity distribution and
sales,
€31 million
of operating income from international operations, and
€130 million
of operating income from gas distribution and sales.
The overall increase in the segment’s operating income was
primarily attributable to a
€543 million,
or 24.9%, increase in operating income from Italian electricity
distribution and sales operations, which was itself mainly due
to lower depreciation and amortization costs
(€389 million),
increased revenues recorded in connection with bonus payment
schemes for continuity and quality of service
(€103 million)
and cost reductions at Enel Distribuzione
(€99 million).
These factors were offset in part by a
€72 million
decrease in operating income generated by the sale of
electricity on the regulated market. The overall increase in the
segment’s operating income also reflected a
€12 million,
or 10.2%, increase in operating income from distribution and
sales of natural gas (primarily due to lower provisions for
€12 million
and lower depreciation and amortization expenses for
€6 million),
and a
€1 million,
or 3.3%, increase in operating income from the segment’s
international operations.
Transmission
The operating income of our Transmission segment, prior to
intersegment eliminations, increased by
€79 million,
or 18.4%, as compared to 2003, due to a
€27 million
decline in provisions as described above and the fact that the
segment’s operating revenues increased more than its
operating expenses. These factors were partially offset by a
€10 million
increase in depreciation expenses reflecting the development of
the portion of the grid assets owned by Terna’s Brazilian
subsidiaries.
Telecommunications
The operating loss of our Telecommunications segment, prior to
intersegment eliminations, narrowed by
€384 million,
or 45.7%, as compared to 2003, as the segment’s operating
revenues increased (mainly as a result of higher revenues from
our mobile and Greek operations and the reversal of the
provision related to the
102
turnover contribution) while operating expenses decreased
(mainly as a result of the transfer to Wind of our fiber optic
backbone and a decline in interconnection costs, as explained
above). The impact of these factors on the overall result of
this segment was partially offset by an increase of
€94 million
in depreciation and amortization costs, as noted above.
Corporate
The operating income of our Corporate segment, prior to
intersegment eliminations, almost tripled, increasing by
€430 million,
as compared to 2003, mainly due to increased revenues related to
the reimbursement of stranded costs, as described in more detail
above.
Services and Other Activities
The operating income of our Services and Other Activities
segment, prior to intersegment eliminations, declined by
€83 million,
or 39.0%, as compared to 2003. The overall decrease in operating
income reflected a decline in operating results at each of the
segment’s principal businesses, including a
€42 million
decrease in operating income from our real estate and related
services business, a
€26 million
decrease in operating income from our engineering and
contracting business, a
€3 million
decrease in operating income at our information technology
services business, and a
€12 million
decrease in operating income from other businesses of the
segment.
Eliminations
Intersegment eliminations for operating income mainly related to
income from our engineering and contracting activities arising
from transactions with companies in our Generation and Energy
Management segment.
Financial Expense
Net financial expenses decreased by
€27 million,
or 2.4%, from
€1,130 million
in 2003 to
€1,103 million,
primarily due to a decrease in the average amount of our net
financial debt over the period. Please see “Liquidity and
Capital Resources — Capital Resources” for
information about our debt in 2004.
Equity Losses
The
€39 million
charge recorded in 2004 (which represented a
€34 million
decrease compared to 2003) was primarily attributable to
write-downs in the value of investments in other companies, of
which
€24 million
related to losses incurred by Leasys, a joint venture we created
with Fiat Auto S.p.A. which provides services of long-term
rentals for corporate automobile fleets, and
€16 million
related to our holdings in Echelon Corporation, the
U.S. company from which we acquired the technology used in
our Telemanagement digital metering program.
Extraordinary Income (expense)
In 2004, we recorded net extraordinary expenses of
€818 million,
as compared to net extraordinary expenses of
€136 million
recorded in 2003, as the impact of a
€1,116 million
write-down of the goodwill attributable to Wind more than offset
the
€973 million
in capital gains on the Terna IPO (gross of the net income
attributable to minority interests for the first semester of
2004) and the disposal of NewReal.
Extraordinary expenses in 2004 were
€1,969 million
and consisted principally of:
•
A write-down of
€1,116 million
to the carrying value of the goodwill attributable to our
Telecommunications segment reflecting the value attributed to
our 100% holding in Wind implied by the binding offer for Wind
we received from Weather in April 2005. In May 2005, we entered
into an agreement for the sale of Wind to Weather in a series of
transactions (please see “Item 4. Information on the
Company — Business — The Enel
Group — Telecommunications”);
•
Charges relating to early retirement incentives totaling
€435 million;
•
Write-downs of fixed assets connected with the maintenance and
updating of our telecommunications network for
€57 million;
103
•
Expenses totaling
€52 million
arising from Terna IPO (including the distribution of
“bonus” shares promised to Italian retail investors
who hold their shares for a specified period);
•
Adjustments to the value of certain items on a consolidated
basis totaling
€41 million
as a result of the application of new corporate and tax
regulations that took effect in 2004;
•
Charges connected with various tax amnesties totaling
€31 million;
•
Adjustments, accruals and other items related to our
Telecommunications segment totaling
€26 million;
•
Charges connected to the combined cycle conversion of our plant
in Santa Barbara totaling
€21 million;
•
Adjustments totaling
€20 million
connected to electricity activities in Spain in prior years;
•
Charges connected to the settlement of certain contractual
issues with the purchaser of Elettrogen totaling
€20 million;
•
Charges related to certain financing obligations undertaken in
connection with the disposal of NewReal totaling
€20 million;
•
Adjustments totaling
€19 million
connected to certain penalties connected to our Nigerian LNG
contract;
•
Capital losses recorded in connection with the disposal of
certain of our water activities totaling
€12 million; and
•
Payment of taxes relating to previous years totaling
€9 million.
These extraordinary expenses were partially offset by
extraordinary income in 2004 of
€1,151 million,
which consisted principally of:
•
€860 million
from the sale of 50% of the share capital of Terna in its June
2004 IPO, consisting of the capital gain on the shares sold
(gross of the net income attributable to minority interest for
the first semester 2004);
•
Capital gains on the disposal of NewReal of
€113 million;
•
Adjustments and other items relating to our Telecommunications
segment totaling
€29 million;
•
Adjustments in income taxes with respect to previous years
amounting to
€26 million,
which resulted from the definition of the tax treatment of
certain items following clarifications on the application of
certain tax rules that were not available at the time our 2003
financial statements were prepared;
•
The release of
€22 million
in excess provisions accounted for in 2003 and related to our
real estate operations; and
•
Capital gains on sales of other assets (mainly distribution
networks in minor urban areas) totaling
€11 million.
You should read note 24 to our consolidated financial
statements for a discussion of the different criteria used under
Italian GAAP and U.S. GAAP for determining what constitutes
an extraordinary item.
Income Taxes
The following table shows a breakdown of our income taxes for
the periods indicated.
Resizing of deferred taxes and deferred tax assets to change in
tax rates
(47
)
—
Total
966
1,533
104
Income tax charges in 2004 amounted to
€1,533 million,
which was
€567 million,
or 58.7%, higher than those in 2003. The increase was
attributable to our higher pre-tax income and the fact that our
effective tax rate increased from 28.5% in 2003 to 35.1% in 2004.
The increase in our effective tax rate was primarily
attributable to the fact that our 2004 write-down of the
carrying value of goodwill attributable to our
Telecommunications segment was not tax-deductible following the
introduction of new rules applicable to write-downs in the
context of a comprehensive Italian corporate tax reform,
effective as of January 1, 2004. We estimate that the
impact of such disallowance increased our 2004 income taxes by
€368 million.
Conversely, our 2004 effective tax rate benefited from the fact
that the capital gains we realized in the Terna IPO and our sale
of NewReal were fully exempt from tax as a result of the reform
noted above, while such gains would have been subject to a
19% substitute tax under the regime in place in 2003. We
estimate that such exemption effectively decreased our 2004
income taxes by
€173 million.
Our effective tax rate for 2004 also reflected our net reversal
of
€474 million
in deferred tax reserves. In particular, we released deferred
tax reserves for
€666 million,
primarily due to the release of reserves that we had accrued for
the payment of taxes that we had estimated would have been due
on any taxable gain we realized upon our disposal of Wind, now
that such gain would be exempt from tax under the new regime
noted above. On the other hand, we accrued
€192 million
in deferred tax reserves to reflect the write-down of a deferred
tax asset established in prior years in light of net loss
carryforwards related to our telecommunications business that we
now deem we will not be able to recover.
You should read notes 12 and 24 to our consolidated
financial statements for more details on our income taxes and
effective tax rate.
Net
Income
Net income increased by
€197 million,
or 7.9%, from
€2,509 million
in 2003 to
€2,706 million
in 2004. This increase was primarily due to the
€1,593 million
increase in operating income described above. The positive
effects of this factor on net income were largely offset by an
increase of
€682 million
in net extraordinary expenses, and an increase of
€567 million
in income taxes, each as described above, as well as the
deduction of
€126 million
in income attributed to minority interests, which compared to a
loss of
€82 million
attributed to minority interests in 2003. The change in the
result attributable to minority interests reflected our sale of
50% of Terna in its June 2004 IPO, as well as the fact that the
loss attributable to minority interests in 2003 reflected France
Télécom’s ownership of a 26.6% stake in Wind,
which stake we acquired in July 2003.
105
2003 Compared with 2002
Operating Revenues
The following table shows the different sources of our operating
revenues for the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002.
Tariff revenues from sales on the regulated market and transport
of electricity on our distribution network
16,244
16,740
Sales to regulatory entities, sales on the free market and sales
on foreign markets
3,964
3,094
Equalization Fund contributions
187
179
Total revenues from electricity sales
20,395
20,013
Telecommunications services
3,642
3,959
Gas sales to end users
780
1,254
Fees for customer connections, inspections and repositioning
services
645
684
Other revenues(1)
4,515
5,407
Total operating revenues
29,977
31,317
(1)
“Other revenues” mainly includes our revenues from
sales of fuel (including natural gas) to third parties, revenues
of our Transmission division, engineering and contracting
activities, and non-recurring items such as reversals of
provisions, bonus payments and reimbursements.
Our consolidated operating revenues for 2003 increased by
€1,340 million,
or 4.5%, compared to 2002. As explained in more detail below,
the overall increase was primarily due to an increase of
€892 million,
or 19.8%, in other revenues, an increase of
€474 million,
or 60.8%, in revenues from gas sold to end users and an increase
of
€317 million,
or 8.7%, in revenues from telecommunications services. The
impact of these factors on the overall results was partially
offset by a decrease of
€382 million,
or 1.9%, in revenues from electricity sales and Equalization
Fund contributions.
Electricity sales
In 2003, total revenues from electricity sales decreased by
€382 million,
or 1.9%, as compared to 2002.
The decline was primarily due to a decrease of
€870 million,
or 21.9%, in revenues from sales to regulatory entities, sales
on the free market and sales on foreign markets, mainly
attributable to a decrease of
€665 million,
or 34.8%, in revenues from sales on the free market reflecting
our new strategy to focus our efforts in this market on sales
producing higher margins, rather than on volumes, a decrease of
€102 million,
or 10.5%, in sales to wholesalers made directly by our
generation companies, and a decrease of
€45 million,
or 4.4%, in sales made by our companies outside of Italy, with
the latter being mainly attributable to the unavailability of
certain plants in Spain for part of the year.
The decline in revenues from sales to regulatory entities, sales
on the free market and sales on foreign markets was only
partially offset by an increase in tariff revenues from sales on
the regulated market and transport of electricity on our
distribution network. In 2003, these revenues increased by
€496 million,
or 3.1%, mainly due to higher volumes transported for the free
market (which increased by 11.3%) and to an increase in the
tariff component aimed at covering the cost of fuel (which
increased by 11.1%), the effects of which were partially offset
by a reduction in the volumes of electricity we sold on the
regulated market (which decreased by 6.3%) reflecting increased
competition and our disposal of certain local distribution
networks.
Telecommunications services
In 2003, our revenues from telecommunications services increased
by
€317 million,
or 8.7%, primarily due to an increase of
€409 million
in revenues from the sale of mobile services.
106
Gas sales to end users
In 2003, our revenues from gas sales to end users increased by
€474 million,
or 60.8%. The increase was mainly attributable to the inclusion
of a full year’s results of Camuzzi, which had only been
consolidated for the last six months of 2002.
Fees for customer connections, inspections and repositioning
services
In 2003, our revenues from fees for customer connections,
inspections and repositioning services increased by
€39 million,
or 6.0%.
Other revenues
Revenues from businesses other than electricity and gas sales
and telecommunications services increased by
€892 million,
or 19.8%. This increase reflected primarily revenues of
€410 million
connected with the reversal of the hydroelectric surcharge that
we had accounted in 2002, following the retroactive abolition of
such surcharge in 2003. The increase in other revenues also
reflected an increase of
€246 million,
or 24.7%, in revenues from engineering and contracting
activities to third parties, an increase of
€143 million
(from
€4 million
in 2002 to
€147 million
in 2003) in bonuses that the Energy Authority granted to us for
having achieved the quality targets set for 2002 and 2001, a
€52 million
increase in revenues from tariffs paid for the use of the
Italian national transmission grid, and a
€52 million
increase in revenues from the transmission grid operators we own
in Brazil. The overall increase also reflected an increase of
€31 million
in revenues from recycling and waste management services
provided by our gas companies, a
€30 million
increase attributable to revenues connected with the
reassessment of interconnection charges that had been accounted
by Wind in 2002 after the rates to interconnect with Telecom
Italia’s network that were applicable for 2002 were set in
2003 (see “Item 4. Information on the
Company — Regulatory Matters —
Telecommunications Regulation —
Interconnection”), a
€25 million
increase in revenues from the disposal of real estate assets, a
€16 million
increase in revenues from franchising activities, and a
€4 million
increase in revenues from public lighting. The overall increase
was offset to a limited extent by a decrease of
€128 million
in revenues from fuel trading activities.
The following table shows operating revenues for each of our
business segments for the periods presented. In 2004, we
eliminated the reportable segment corresponding to our
international division (see
“— Overview — Business Segments”).
Accordingly, in order to present segment information for the
periods presented on a comparable basis, we have reclassified
certain segment information for 2003 and 2002 to conform to the
2004 presentation.
In 2003, operating revenues of our Generation and Energy
Management segment, prior to intersegment eliminations,
increased by
€1,219 million,
or 10.7%, as compared to 2002. The total revenues of the segment
of
€12,607 million
comprised revenues from its Italian operations of
€12,111 million,
revenues from its international operations of
€518 million
and eliminations for intrasegment sales of
€22 million,
which mainly related to sales of fuel from Enel Trade to our
international generation companies. The overall increase in the
segment’s revenues was attributable to a
€1,230 million,
or 11.3%, increase in revenues from the segment’s
107
operations in Italy prior to intrasegment eliminations, and
reflected the negative impact of a
€16 million,
or 3.0%, decrease, prior to intrasegment eliminations, in
revenues from international operations.
The increase in revenues from Italian activities primarily
reflected our transfer to this segment of sale activities for
electricity customers with an annual consumption higher than 100
GWh (approximately
€560 million
of the increase) and gas wholesalers (approximately
€330 million
of the increase), that were carried out by our Sales,
Infrastructure and Networks segment in 2002. We estimate that
approximately
€640 million
of the increase in revenues from the segment’s Italian
operations was due to an increase of 11.1% in the tariff
component aimed at covering the cost of fuel. The increase from
Italian operations also reflected revenues of
€410 million
connected with the reversal of the hydroelectric surcharge that
we had accounted for in 2002, and a
€102 million
reimbursement through the Equalization Fund of certain charges
we incurred in 2002 for the purchase of green certificates. The
positive impact of these factors was only partially offset by
the deconsolidation of Eurogen and Interpower, which we estimate
had a negative effect on the segment’s sales of
approximately
€820 million.
The
€16 million
decrease in revenues from international operations prior to
intrasegment eliminations reflected a decrease of
€126 million
in revenues from our Spanish operations that was attributable to
the unavailability of certain plants of Viesgo during planned
maintenance, the impact of which was largely offset by
€108 million
in revenues attributable to the first-time consolidation of
Maritza following its acquisition in March 2003 and a
€6 million
increase in revenues from our operations in North America.
Sales, Infrastructure and Networks
In 2003, operating revenues of our Sales, Infrastructure and
Networks segment, prior to intersegment eliminations, decreased
by
€533 million,
or 2.5%, as compared to 2002. The total revenues of the segment
of
€20,433 million
comprised revenues from Italian electricity sales of
€18,673 million,
revenues from gas sales of
€1,374 million
and revenues from the segment’s international electricity
operations of
€386 million
(in 2003 there were no eliminations for intrasegment sales
related to this segment). The overall decrease in the
segment’s revenues was primarily attributable to a decline
of
€844 million,
or 4.3%, in revenues from electricity sales in Italy, offset
only partially by a
€305 million,
or 28.5%, increase in revenues from sales of gas to end users,
and a
€6 million,
or 1.6%, increase in sales of electricity by the segment’s
international operations (which consist of electricity
distribution and sale activities in Spain).
Approximately
€1,485 million
of the decline in Italian electricity revenues was attributable
to the transfer to the Generation and Energy Management segment
of the operations described above, and to the strategic change
in focus of our free market sales. The negative impact of these
factors was only partially offset by increases of
€250 million
in revenues from sales on the domestic regulated market and the
transport of electricity sold on the free market,
€202 million
in revenues from electricity supplied to resellers (primarily
due to increased purchases from municipal distributors as a
result of our disposal of certain distribution networks),
€143 million
in bonuses that the Energy Authority granted to us for having
achieved the quality targets set for 2002 and 2001, and
€61 million
in revenues from our franchising activities.
The increase of
€305 million
in revenues from sales of gas to end users was primarily
attributable to the inclusion of a full year’s results of
Camuzzi, which had only been consolidated for the last six
months of the year in 2002.
Transmission
In 2003, the operating revenues of our Transmission segment,
prior to intersegment eliminations, increased by
€99 million,
or 12.0%, as compared to 2002, primarily due to a
€52 million
increase in transmission revenues attributable to higher
tariffs, which was only partially offset by a
€6 million
decrease in revenues for the construction and maintenance of
high-voltage lines. The increase also reflected revenues of
€53 million
from the international operations of this segment, which had
generated no revenue in 2002.
Telecommunications
In 2003, the operating revenues of our Telecommunications
segment, prior to intersegment eliminations, increased by
€462 million,
or 11.8%, as compared to 2002. The increase was primarily
attributable to an
108
increase of
€409 million
in revenues from mobile services due to increased traffic on
Wind’s network. The overall increase also reflected
revenues of
€54 million
arising from the reassessment of costs for services provided by
other telecommunications operators that had been estimated and
recorded in 2002, the contribution of
€44 million
from our activities in Greece launched in 2003 and
€30 million
relating to the reassessment of interconnection charges
accounted for in 2002. The positive impact of these factors was
only partially offset by a decrease of
€104 million
in revenues from fixed-line services in Italy due to a decrease
in traffic volumes.
Corporate
In 2003, the operating revenues of our Corporate segment, prior
to intersegment eliminations, decreased by
€834 million,
or 42.3%, as compared to 2002. This decrease was primarily
attributable to the fact that the 2002 results had included nine
months of revenues (approximately
€577 million)
for the purchase of fuel by our Generation and Energy Management
segment, reflecting the transfer of contracts for the purchase
of fuel to Enel Trade of the Generation and Energy Management
segment which was completed at the end of 2002. Approximately
€260 million
of the decrease was attributable to the fact that the segment
purchased and resold a lower volume of imported electricity to
Enel Distribuzione.
Services and Other Activities
In 2003, the operating revenues in our Services and Other
Activities segment, prior to intersegment eliminations,
decreased by
€141 million,
or 4.9%, as compared to 2002. Of the segment’s total of
€2,742 million
in operating revenues, prior to intersegment eliminations,
€1,694 million
was attributable to engineering and contracting,
€462 million
to information technology services,
€397 million
to real estate and related services, and
€259 million
to other activities. Approximately 45% of these revenues were
generated by transactions with other Group companies.
Eliminations for intrasegment operations in 2003 were
€70 million.
The decrease in revenues from this segment’s operations was
primarily due to the deconsolidation of CESI as of
January 1, 2003, which we estimate accounted for a decline
in revenues of approximately
€115 million,
and to the January 1, 2003 transfer to the Sales,
Infrastructure and Networks segment of certain materiel and
logistics activities from our real estate activities, which had
accounted for approximately
€94 million
in revenues in 2002. The decrease also reflected a decline of
€61 million
in revenues from our information technology activities due to
their transfer to Wind of our fiber optic backbone network and a
reduction in prices at Enel.it. The negative impact of these
factors on the segment’s revenues was partially offset by a
€73 million
increase in revenues from engineering and contracting due to
increased activities for third parties (including a
€55 million
settlement of a dispute over a contract for the construction of
a plant in Libya), and by a
€48 million
increase in revenues from other activities such as personnel
administration, professional training services, and factoring.
Eliminations
Eliminations in operating revenues primarily relate to
intersegment sales (primarily of electricity and fuel) and
services (primarily engineering and contracting). In 2003,
eliminations decreased by
€1,068 million,
or 8.9%, as compared to 2002, mainly reflecting the transfer of
the agreements for the purchase of fuel from our Corporate
segment to our Generation and Energy Management segment and the
transfer to our Generation and Energy Management segment of the
activities related to sales to large electricity users and gas
wholesalers that in 2002 were carried out by our Sales,
Infrastructure and Network segment, which purchased gas and part
of the electricity sold to these customers from our Generation
and Energy Management segment.
109
Operating Expenses
The following table shows a breakdown of our operating expenses
for each of the periods presented:
As described in more detail below, our consolidated operating
expenses for 2003 decreased by
€551 million,
or 2.4%, as compared to 2002. Expressed as a percentage of
operating revenues, operating expenses decreased from 75.5% in
2002 to 70.5% in 2003, reflecting the fact that operating
revenues grew while operating expenses decreased. The decrease
in the absolute figure was primarily due to the abolition of the
hydroelectric surcharge which had amounted to
€424 million
(of which
€14 million
related to Eurogen and Interpower) in 2002; largely as a result,
overall expenses for services and rentals fell by
€486 million.
The decrease in consolidated operating expenses also reflected
declines of
€182 million
in costs for purchased power,
€154 million
in costs for fuel for thermal generation,
€149 million
in personnel costs, and a
€101 million
decrease in costs for materials and supplies. The positive
effect of these factors was only partially offset by a
€229 million
decrease in capitalized expenses, and increases of
€203 million
and
€89 million
in other costs and provisions, respectively.
Personnel
Personnel costs decreased by
€149 million,
or 4.2%, as compared to 2002, primarily due to a 6.6% decline in
the average number of employees. The decline in headcount
reflected early retirements spurred by incentives, as well as
the deconsolidation of Eurogen and Interpower. Average costs per
employee, however, increased by 2.6%, reflecting compensation
increases required under the collective labor agreement for the
electricity industry.
Fuel for thermal generation
Costs for fuel for thermal generation decreased by
€154 million,
or 3.6%, as compared to 2002, primarily due to a decrease of
3.9% in the volume of electricity produced from thermal sources
that was itself largely due to the deconsolidation of Eurogen
and Interpower. The decrease was partially offset by the effect
of an increase of approximately 21.1% and approximately 7.0% in
market prices for low-sulfur fuel oil and coal, respectively,
and a
€33 million
increase attributable to the first time consolidation of Maritza.
Purchased power
Purchased power costs decreased by
€182 million,
or 3.8%, as compared to 2002, with the rate of decrease being
significantly less than the 10.6% decline in the volume of power
we purchased that was linked to a reduction in the volume of
power we sold on the free market. The increase in average
purchase costs reflected an increase in the percentage of power
purchased from Italian sources (where prices are usually higher
than those for imports).
110
Services and rentals
Services and rentals costs decreased by
€486 million,
or 8.5%, as compared to 2002, primarily due to the abolition of
the hydroelectric surcharge, which had accounted for
€424 million
(of which
€14 million
relating to Eurogen and Interpower) in costs in 2002. The
decline was also attributable to a
€45 million
decrease in costs for interconnection and roaming in our
telecommunications activities, reflecting our reduced need for
such services due to the development of our telecommunications
network, and to a
€17 million
decrease in costs for advisory services provided by third
parties.
Materials and supplies
Materials and supplies costs decreased by
€101 million,
or 2.4%, as compared to 2002. Costs for materials fell by
€242 million,
reflecting lower levels of construction in our Sales,
Infrastructure and Networks segment, while those for fuel for
trading activities fell by
€146 million
due to reduced sales volumes. The impact of these decreases on
the overall figure was partially offset by an increase of
€287 million
in costs for gas purchased for resale to end users reflecting
the inclusion of a full year’s results of Camuzzi, which
had only been consolidated for the last six months of the year
in 2002.
Provisions
Provisions increased by
€89 million,
or 17.7%, as compared to 2002. The increase reflected an
increase of
€135 million
in accruals for risks and charges and write-downs in our
Generation and Energy Management segment, which was primarily
due to accruals for
€57 million
for the risk that we are subject to additional hydroelectric
surcharges related to electricity produced in 2001 and
€38 million
for risks on fuel trading and other contracts. The overall
increase also reflected an increase of
€30 million
in accruals for risks and charges in our Transmission segment
(primarily related to the risk of payments resulting from the
recalculation of the portion of the fees for the use of the
national transmission grid). These were partially offset by a
€63 million
decrease in accruals for risks and charges in our Services and
Other Activities segment attributable to our engineering and
contracting sector, and a
€17 million
decrease in accruals for risks and charges in our Sales,
Infrastructure and Networks segment.
Other costs
Other costs increased by
€203 million,
or 28.2%, as compared to 2002, primarily as a result of a
€193 million
increase in costs incurred by our Sales, Infrastructure and
Networks segment in connection with charges introduced by new
regulations on energy efficiency, the use of clean energy
resources and improvements in the continuity and quality of
service.
Capitalized expenses
Capitalized expenses decreased by
€229 million,
or 19.5%, as compared to 2002, primarily reflecting lower levels
of construction activity in our Sales, Infrastructure and
Networks segment.
The following table shows a breakdown of our operating expenses
by business segment for each of the periods presented.
Operating expenses for our Generation and Energy Management
segment (which primarily consist of fuel costs, fees paid to the
Gestore della Rete, and personnel and maintenance costs for our
power plants), prior to intersegment eliminations, increased by
€283 million,
or 3.3%, as compared to 2002. The total expenses of the segment
of
€8,948 million
reflected expenses for Italian generation of
€8,642 million,
expenses for international generation of
€328 million
and eliminations for intrasegment operations of
€22 million.
The overall increase was primarily attributable to a
€302 million,
or 3.6%, increase, prior to intrasegment eliminations, in
expenses for the segment’s Italian operations which was
offset in part by a
€24 million,
or 6.8%, decrease, prior to intrasegment eliminations, in
expenses for international operations.
Intersegment transfers of operations had a significant impact on
the increase in expenses at the segment’s Italian
operations. Sales to electricity customers with an annual
consumption higher than 100 GWh accounted for approximately
€560 million
in operating expenses during the year (since we purchased from
third parties most of the electricity sold to these customers),
while sales to gas wholesalers accounted for approximately
€306 million
in costs. Responsibility for each of these activities had been
transferred from the Sales, Infrastructure and Networks segment
as of January 1, 2003. The increase in expenses for Italian
operations was also attributable to a
€330 million
increase in costs for purchases of fuel for power generation,
and a
€124 million
increase in provisions. The impact of these factors was
partially offset by a decrease in costs of approximately
€674 million
attributable to the deconsolidation of Eurogen and Interpower
and the impact of the abolition of the hydroelectric surcharge
that had been responsible for
€410 million
in costs in the prior year.
The decrease in expenses for the segment’s international
generation operations primarily reflected a decline of
€98 million
in costs at our Spanish plants due to the shutdown of plants for
part of the year, which was only partially offset by the
€65 million
in costs attributable to the first time consolidation of
Maritza, and a
€9 million
increase in provisions and write-downs in our operations in
North America.
Sales, Infrastructure and Networks
Operating expenses for our Sales, Infrastructure and Networks
segment (which primarily consist of purchases of power and
natural gas and costs associated with running our distribution
network), prior to intersegment eliminations, decreased by
€719 million,
or 4.1%, as compared to 2002. The total expenses of the segment
of
€16,870 million
reflected expenses for Italian electricity activities of
€15,421 million,
expenses from gas sales of
€1,127 million,
and expenses from the segment’s international electricity
operations of
€322 million
(in 2003 there were no eliminations for intrasegment expenses
related to this segment). The overall decrease in the
segment’s expenses was primarily attributable to a decline
of
€903 million,
or 5.5%, in expenses for electricity activities in Italy, offset
only in part by a
€182 million,
or 19.3% increase in expenses for gas activities and a
€2 million,
or 0.6%, increase in expenses for the segment’s
international operations.
The decrease in expenses for electricity activities in Italy
primarily reflected an aggregate decline of
€1,450 million
in costs related to the transfer to the Generation and Energy
Management segment of the operations described above and the
decrease in costs for the purchase of imported electricity and
electricity from CIP 6 producers. The decrease also reflected a
decrease of
€58 million
in personnel costs,
€45 million
in costs for materials, and
€40 million
in costs for services. These declines were only partially offset
by a
€655 million
increase in costs for purchase of electricity resold on the
regulated market and transport of electricity sold on the free
market, and a
€59 million
increase in franchising costs.
The
€182 million
increase in expenses at the segment’s gas activities was
primarily attributable to the inclusion of a full year’s
results of Camuzzi (now Enel Rete Gas), which had only been
consolidated for the last six months of the year in 2002.
Transmission
Operating expenses for our Transmission segment, prior to
intersegment eliminations, increased by
€29 million,
or 9.2%, as compared to 2002, due to a
€30 million
increase in accruals for the risk of payments resulting from the
recalculation of the portion of the fees for the use of the
national transmission grid
112
pertaining to us, and a
€18 million
increase in expenses at Terna’s Brazilian subsidiaries. The
impact of these factors was partially offset by an aggregate
decrease of
€19 million
in costs for services and personnel.
Telecommunications
Operating expenses for our Telecommunications segment, prior to
intersegment eliminations, increased by
€63 million,
or 1.8%, as compared to 2002. This increase reflected a
€78 million
increase in costs for services (mainly advertising and
outsourcing) and a
€32 million
increase in personnel costs that were partially offset by a
€45 million
decrease in interconnection and roaming costs, reflecting our
reduced need for such services due to the development of our
telecommunications network.
Corporate
Operating expenses for our Corporate segment, prior to
intersegment eliminations, decreased by
€893 million,
or 49.5%, as compared to 2002, primarily due to the transfer of
the agreements for the purchase of fuel to our Generation and
Energy Management segment, which we estimate accounted for
€578 million
of the decrease, and a
€300 million
decrease in costs for purchased power reflecting reduced imports.
Services and Other Activities
Operating expenses in our Services and Other Activities segment,
prior to intersegment eliminations, decreased by
€408 million,
or 14.9%, as compared to 2002, primarily reflecting a
€290 million
decrease in costs for our engineering and contracting operations
attributable to the fact that in 2002 we had recorded accounting
accruals and to losses incurred in certain international
operations, a
€100 million
decrease attributable to the deconsolidation of CESI, and a
€54 million
decrease in costs in our real estate business reflecting a
reduced level of activities. The impact of these factors on the
total was only partially offset by a
€31 million
increase in costs for other activities such as personnel
administration, professional training services, factoring and
reinsurance.
Eliminations
Eliminations for operating expenses principally consist of the
elimination of intersegment electricity and fuel purchases and
costs for the provision of intersegment services. In 2003, the
decrease of
€1,094 million,
or 9.2%, was generally in line with the corresponding amount
relating to operating revenues.
Depreciation and Amortization
The following table shows depreciation and amortization for each
of our business segments for each of the periods presented:
Depreciation and amortization for 2003 increased by
€39 million,
or 0.9%, as compared to 2002, mainly as a result of a
€220 million
increase in our Telecommunications segment that was partially
offset by a
€93 million
decrease in our Transmission segment and a
€81 million
decrease in our Generation and Energy Management segment.
Depreciation and amortization for our Generation and Energy
Management segment decreased by
€81 million,
or 6.3%, primarily as a result of the deconsolidation of Eurogen
and Interpower, which we estimate reduced these expenses by
approximately
€97 million.
Depreciation and amortization for our Sales,
113
Infrastructure and Networks segment decreased by
€15 million,
or 1.2%, primarily due to a
€63 million
decrease attributable to lower depreciation charges relating to
our Italian electricity distribution network following the sale
of certain local distribution networks, as well as reduced
investments, the effect of which was partially offset by an
increase of
€43 million
in depreciation and amortization for our gas activities
attributable to the inclusion of a full year’s results of
Camuzzi, which had only been consolidated for the last six
months of the year in 2002. Depreciation and amortization for
our Transmission segment decreased by
€93 million,
or 37.7%, primarily reflecting our decision to increase the
useful life of our transmission grid from 35 to 40 years
following the results of technical tests supporting a longer
useful life for such assets. This factor accounted for
€104 million
of the decrease in depreciation and amortization at this segment
and was partially offset by a
€9 million
increase in depreciation and amortization expenses at
Terna’s Brazilian subsidiaries. Depreciation and
amortization for our Telecommunications segment increased by
€220 million,
or 14.7%, as compared to 2002, primarily due to a
€144 million
increase attributable to higher depreciation of our
telecommunications network attributable to the depreciation of
the assets we acquired in connection with the development of our
network costing
€1,559 million
in 2002 and
€685 million
in 2003, as well as an increase of
€129 million
attributable to the amortization of our UMTS license for the
first time in 2003 (when we became able to utilize it). The
impact of these factors on the overall result for the segment
was partially offset by a decrease of
€53 million
in amortization of goodwill reflecting the net effect of a
decrease of
€108 million
in the value of the segment’s goodwill (mainly resulting
from the acquisition of Infostrada) due to the write-downs
recorded in 2002 and an increase of
€55 million
due to the amortization of the goodwill resulting from our
acquisition of France Télécom’s stake in Wind.
You should read “— Outlook —
Acquisition of Infostrada and Sole Ownership of Wind” for
further details on such acquisition.
Operating Income
The following table shows operating income for each of our
business segments for the periods presented:
Operating income increased by
€1,852 million,
or 64.3%, as compared to 2002, primarily due to a
€1,017 million
increase in income in our Generation and Energy Management
segment. The overall increase also reflected a
€163 million
increase in income in our Transmission segment, a
€259 million
increase in income in our Services and Other Activities segment,
a
€201 million
increase in income in our Sales, Infrastructure and Networks
segment, and a
€179 million
increase in income in our Telecommunications segment.
Generation and Energy Management
Operating income of our Generation and Energy Management
segment, prior to intersegment eliminations, increased by
€1,017 million,
or 70.6%, as compared to 2002. The segment’s operating
income was comprised of operating income from Italian generation
operations of
€2,388 million,
and operating income from international operations of
€69 million.
The overall increase in the segment’s operating income
reflected a
€1,015 million,
or 73.9%, increase in operating income from its Italian
generation operations and a
€2 million,
or 3.0%, increase in operating income from its international
generation operations.
The increase in operating income from Italian generation
activities was primarily attributable to the impact on operating
margins of the abolition of the hydroelectric surcharge, which
had a doubly positive effect
114
on margins in 2003. The reversal of the hydroelectric surcharge
that we had accounted for in 2002, following the retroactive
abolition of such surcharge in 2003, contributed
€410 million
to our operating revenues, while the fact that we did not have
to account for such charges in 2003 reduced our operating
expenses by an equivalent amount. The increase in operating
income from Italian activities also reflected
€310 million
in additional revenues attributable to the increase in the
tariff component aimed at covering fuel costs, and a
€102 million
increase due to the reimbursement of certain charges incurred in
2002 for the purchase of green certificates. These positive
factors were partially offset by a
€124 million
increase in provisions and a
€49 million
decrease in operating income attributable to the deconsolidation
of Eurogen and Interpower. The
€2 million
increase in operating income generated by the international
generation operations of the segment reflected a
€39 million
increase attributable to the first time consolidation of
Maritza, which was partially offset by a
€30 million
decrease in operating income at Viesgo and a
€7 million
decrease in operating income from our operations in North and
Central and South America.
Sales, Infrastructure and Networks
Operating income of our Sales, Infrastructure and Networks
segment, prior to intersegment eliminations, increased by
€201 million,
or 9.4%, as compared to 2002. Total operating income of the
segment comprised
€2,181 million
of operating income from Italian electricity sales,
€118 million
of operating income from gas distribution and sales and
€30 million
of operating income from international electricity operations.
The overall increase in the segment’s operating income was
attributable to an increase of
€119 million,
or 5.8%, in operating income from electricity sales in Italy, an
€80 million
increase in operating income from sales of gas distribution and
sales (which more than doubled from
€38 million
in 2002), and an increase of
€2 million,
or 7.1%, in operating income from the segment’s
international operations.
The increase in operating income from Italian electricity sales
was primarily attributable to a
€143 million
increase in bonuses that the Energy Authority granted to us for
having achieved the quality targets set for 2002 and 2001, and
to a decrease in costs for personnel, materials and services
totaling an aggregate of
€143 million.
The increase in operating income from Italian electricity sales
also reflected
€63 million
in lower depreciation charges on the electricity distribution
network, as described above. The impact of these positive
factors was partially offset by a
€203 million
decrease in operating income from the sale of electricity that
was attributable to the combination of lower tariff levels and a
decrease in sales volumes. The
€80 million
increase in operating income from the segment’s gas
activities primarily reflected the first time inclusion of a
full year’s results of Camuzzi.
Transmission
Operating income of our Transmission segment, prior to
intersegment eliminations, increased by
€163 million,
or 61.0%, as compared to 2002, primarily due to a decline of
€104 million
in depreciation charges on Terna’s transmission grid as a
result of the change in useful lives described above, a
€46 million
increase in revenues at Terna (partially offset by a
€11 million
increase in operating expenses), and the improvement in the
result of the international operations of the segment, which
recorded operating income of
€22 million
in 2003, as compared to an operating loss of
€4 million
in 2002.
Telecommunications
Operating loss of our Telecommunications segment, prior to
intersegment eliminations, decreased by
€179 million,
or 17.6%, as compared to 2002, reflecting a higher volume of
activity. The increase in revenues reduced the operating loss of
the segment by
€462 million,
though the effect of this on the total was partially offset by
the
€220 million
increase in depreciation and amortization costs and a
€63 million
increase in operating expenses discussed above.
Corporate
Operating income of our Corporate segment, prior to intersegment
eliminations, increased by
€59 million,
or 36.0%, as compared to 2002, mainly due to a decline in the
operating expenses of this segment described above.
115
Services and Other Activities
Operating income of our Services and Other Activities segment,
prior to intersegment eliminations, was
€213 million,
as compared to an operating loss of
€46 million
in 2002. The improvement in the segment’s operating result
was primarily due to a
€363 million
increase in operating income from our engineering and
contracting business, which had recorded losses attributable to
its international operations in 2002. The impact of this
turnaround was partially offset by a
€62 million
decrease in operating income from our information technology
services and a
€48 million
decrease in operating income from our real estate and related
services due to their reduced level of activities.
Eliminations
Eliminations for operating income mainly relate to income from
our engineering and contracting activities arising from
transactions with companies in our Generation and Energy
Management segment. In 2003, the increase of
€26 million,
or 48.1%, reflected an increase in these intersegment activities.
Financial Expense
Net financial expense decreased by
€48 million,
or 4.1%, from
€1,178 million
in 2002 to
€1,130 million
in 2003, primarily due to the reduction in the average interest
rate applied to our financial debt from 4.7% in 2002 to 4.4% in
2003, the effect of which was partially offset by an increase
from
€23,386 million
in 2002 to
€24,119 million
in 2003 in our average net financial debt. The total increase in
our average net financial debt was primarily attributable to our
financing of the acquisition of France Télécom’s
26.6% stake in Wind.
Equity Losses
The
€73 million
charge recorded in 2003 (an increase of
€14 million
or 23.7% from 2002) consisted primarily of write-downs in the
value of investments in other companies, of which
€72 million
related our holdings in Leasys, a joint venture we created with
Fiat Auto S.p.A. which provides services of long-term rentals
for corporate automobile fleets, due to losses incurred by the
venture.
Extraordinary Income (expense)
In 2003, we recorded net extraordinary expenses of
€136 million,
as compared to net extraordinary income of
€736 million
recorded in 2002.
Extraordinary expenses for 2003 principally consisted of:
•
Charges connected with early retirement incentives totaling
€256 million;
•
A write-down of
€133 million
and accruals for
€58 million
made in connection with the conversion to coal of a plant in
Torrevaldaliga Nord;
•
Charges for restructuring and reorganization totaling
€92 million,
of which
€69 million
related to our Telecommunications segment and included losses
from the early disposal of certain computer hardware and
software, costs for training of personnel, and penalties for
early termination of certain supply agreements, with the
remaining
€23 million
pertaining to our real estate operations;
•
Several charges connected with the tax amnesty totaling
€83 million;
•
Adjustments relating to previous years’ capital grants
amounting to
€60 million;
•
Adjustments and other items relating to our Telecommunications
segment, totaling
€44 million;
•
Adjustments amounting to
€30 million
due to the settlement of transactions due to extraordinary
events;
•
Write-downs of assets totaling
€23 million
(of which
€19 million
related to our Generation and Energy Management segment);
•
Adjustments amounting to
€20 million
on the value of stocks of fuel;
•
Write-downs of assets connected with our combined cycle
conversion plan totaling
€8 million;
•
Payment of taxes relating to previous years totaling
€6 million;
116
•
Extraordinary reimbursements made to customers totaling
€4 million.
These extraordinary expenses were partially offset by
extraordinary income that principally consisted of:
•
A capital gain on the disposal of Interpower of
€356 million;
•
Capital gains on the disposal of electricity distribution
networks in several municipalities of aggregate
€165 million,
of which
€120 million
related to the disposal of the distribution network in Brescia;
•
Adjustments in income taxes with respect to previous years for a
total of
€58 million,
resulting from the definition of the tax treatment of certain
items following clarifications on the application of certain
rules provided in 2003;
•
Indemnities amounting to
€44 million;
•
Write-offs of extraordinary provisions and other items relating
primarily to our Generation and Energy Management segment
totaling
€37 million;
•
Adjustments and other items relating to our Telecommunications
segment, totaling
€31 million.
You should read note 24 to our consolidated financial
statements for a discussion of the different criteria used under
Italian GAAP and U.S. GAAP for determining what constitutes
an extraordinary item.
Income Taxes
The following table shows a breakdown of our income taxes for
the periods indicated.
Release of deferred tax provision following freeing-up of
accelerated depreciation reserves
(60
)
—
Tax incentives on capital expenditure (Tremonti-bis Law)
(213
)
—
Reversal of deferred tax provision as a result of revaluation of
assets carried out in statutory accounts by Group companies
—
(375
)
Resizing of deferred taxes and deferred tax assets to change in
tax rates
(38
)
(47
)
Total
€
608
€
966
The total tax charge for 2003 was
€966 million,
which was
€358 million,
or 58.9%, higher than the charge for 2002. The increase
reflected primarily a
€507 million
increase in current and deferred taxes primarily due to the
increase in income.
This total tax charge reflected our effective tax rate of 28.5%,
net of the effects of non-recurring items, as opposed to an
overall tax rate which would have amounted approximately to 45%
in the absence of such non-recurring items.
The decline in the tax rate is primarily attributable to the
partial release of the deferred tax reserve for an amount of
€375 million
resulting from the value of certain classes of assets having
been restated by some of our companies in their statutory
accounts. Under Italian tax rules, companies may accelerate the
amortization of certain assets for tax purposes insofar as they
create two special reserves. The first reserve accounts for the
accelerated amortization. The other reserve accounts for the
deferred taxes (calculated by applying the standard corporate
tax rate) that will be due on the portion of amortization
reflected in the financial statements, but already deducted for
tax purposes because of the accelerated amortization. In 2003,
pursuant to a special tax regime, certain of our companies
stepped up the value of certain classes of assets amortized on a
tax acceleration basis by paying a 19% substitute tax rate,
thereby aligning the value that such assets carried in the
statutory accounts with the value that they carry in the
consolidated financial statements. This resulted in a decrease
of our effective corporate tax rate equal to the difference
between the standard corporate tax rate (at which the deferred
tax reserve had been accounted for by our companies) and the
19% substitute tax due on the increase in value of the
assets amortized on a tax acceleration basis.
117
Deferred taxes and deferred tax assets were adjusted to take
into account the cut in the corporate tax rate to 33%, resulting
in a decrease of the value of such accounting items equal to
€47 million.
In addition, certain of the special tax regimes from which we
had benefited in 2002 were no longer available in 2003, as
indicated in the table above.
Net Income
Net income increased by
€501 million,
or 25.0%, from
€2,008 million
in 2002 to
€2,509 million
in 2003. This increase was primarily due to the
€1,852 million
increase in operating income and
€48 million
decrease in net financial expenses described above. The positive
effects of these factors on net income was partially offset by
extraordinary expense of
€136 million
(as compared to extraordinary income of
€736 million
in 2002), a
€358 million
increase in income taxes, a
€155 million
decrease in losses attributed to minority shareholders
reflecting our acquisition of France Télécom’s
former minority interest in Wind, and a
€14 million
increase in equity losses, each of which is described in more
detail above.
Inflation
The tariffs for sales of electricity in effect over the periods
covered by the financial statements included in this annual
report were not adjusted for inflation. Inflation in Italy was
2.5% in 2002, 2.7% in 2003, and 2.2% in 2004. As a result, the
real value of tariffs decreased over time.
U.S. GAAP Reconciliation
We have prepared our consolidated financial statements in
accordance with accounting principles prescribed by Italian law
and supplemented by the accounting principles issued by the
Consiglio Nazionale dei Dottori Commercialisti e dei Ragionieri,
or Italian GAAP, which differ in certain respects from
U.S. GAAP. The principal differences between Italian GAAP
and U.S. GAAP, as applied to our consolidated financial
statements, relate to the following:
•
Fixed assets and related depreciation;
•
Capitalized interest and related depreciation;
•
Customers’ connection fees;
•
Pension and employee termination accounting;
•
Other post-retirement benefits accounting;
•
Derivatives;
•
Advertising and start-up costs;
•
Software;
•
Goodwill, write-down and related amortization;
•
Restructuring reserve and conversion costs;
•
Italian pension system obligations;
•
Asset retirement obligations;
•
Early retirement program;
•
Gain on sale of real estate businesses;
•
Stock option compensation expense;
•
Additional share qualification for Terna shareholders;
•
Consolidation;
•
Accounting for income taxes;
•
Investment in equity securities;
•
Extraordinary income and expenses; and.
118
•
Electricity Industry Pension Fund.
You should read note 24 to our consolidated financial
statements for a more detailed discussion of the principal
differences between Italian GAAP and U.S. GAAP that affect
our consolidated financial statements; note 25 to our
consolidated financial statements for a reconciliation of net
income and shareholders’ equity between Italian GAAP and
U.S. GAAP; and note 26 to our consolidated financial
statements for additional U.S. GAAP disclosures.
Our consolidated net income under U.S. GAAP was
approximately
€1,399 million
in 2002,
€2,376 million
in 2003 and
€1,031 million
in 2004, as compared to consolidated net income under Italian
GAAP of
€2,008 million
in 2002,
€2,509 million
in 2003 and
€2,706 million
in 2004. Our shareholders’ equity under U.S. GAAP was
€18,526 million
at December 31, 2002,
€18,651 million
at December 31, 2003, and
€15,697 million
at December 31, 2004 as compared with shareholders’
equity under Italian GAAP of
€20,772 million
at December 31, 2002,
€21,124 million
at December 31, 2003 and
€19,847 million
at December 31, 2004.
The differences between U.S. GAAP and Italian GAAP also
have an impact on operating income at the segment level. The
differences result primarily from recognition of revenues
related to customers’ connection fees, goodwill impairment
and amortization, property-related adjustments, reversal of
costs accrued for the early retirement program and different
classifications of extraordinary expenses. In addition, the
extraordinary contribution to the national electricity industry
pension system represents a negative pre-tax reconciliation
difference of
€446 million
in 2002, a positive pre-tax reconciliation difference of
€124 million
in 2003, and a positive pre-tax reconciliation difference of
€89 million
in 2004. Please see “Item 6. Directors, Senior
Management and Employees — Employees —
Employee benefits” for a discussion of these contributions.
Critical Accounting Policies under U.S. GAAP
In addition to the critical accounting policies discussed above
under “— Overview — Critical accounting
policies,” management considers that the following critical
accounting policies in the reconciliation of net income and
shareholders’ equity between Italian GAAP and
U.S. GAAP require reliance upon significant judgments,
estimates and assumptions.
Recoverability of goodwill. For U.S. GAAP, we
adopted the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting
Standard SFAS No. 142 (FASB 142), “Goodwill and
Other Intangible Assets,” as of January 1, 2002, which
did not result in any impairment as of that date. SFAS 142
requires that goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite
useful lives no longer be amortized and that goodwill be tested
for impairment at least annually (and between annual tests when
certain triggering events occur) using a two-step approach at
the reporting unit level. Reporting units may be tested at
different times during the year. The first step involves
comparing the fair value of the reporting unit to its book
value, including goodwill and intangible assets. The
determination of fair value of each reporting unit is based on
the present value of future cash flows and requires significant
judgment. If the fair value of the reporting unit is less than
its book value, a second step is required to be performed which
compares the implied fair values to the book values of the
reporting units’ goodwill. The implied fair value of the
goodwill is the difference between the fair value of the
reporting unit and the net fair values of the recognized and
unrecognized intangible identifiable assets and liabilities of
the reporting unit. The fair value of intangible assets with
indefinite lives is determined based on expected discounted
future cash flows. If the fair value of goodwill and other
intangible assets with indefinite lives are less than their book
values, the differences are recorded as impairment charges. With
regard to our telecommunications reporting unit, the annual
impairment test which was performed at June 30, 2002
resulted in us recording impairment charges of
€2,336 million
under U.S. GAAP relating to goodwill during the year ended
December 31, 2002. No such impairment resulted from the
similar testing performed in 2003. The annual impairment test
performed at June 30, 2004 did not result in an impairment,
however, due to a change in circumstances that we believed would
more likely than not reduce the fair value of the reporting unit
below its carrying amount, we performed a new impairment test at
December 31, 2004, which resulted in the recording of
impairment charges under U.S. GAAP of
€3,393 million.
Pension and other post-retirement benefits. Certain of
our employees are covered under pension plans, which allow for
retirement benefits based upon compensation and years of
service, and certain employees are
119
also covered under other post-retirement benefit plans. Several
statistical and judgmental factors which attempt to anticipate
future events are used in calculating the expense and liability
related to the plans. These factors include assumptions about
the discount rate, the rate of future compensation increases and
health care cost trends. In addition, our actuarial consultants
also use subjective factors such as withdrawal and mortality
rates in making relevant estimates. The actuarial assumptions
used may differ materially from actual results due to changing
market and economic conditions, higher or lower withdrawal
rates, longer or shorter life spans of participants and changes
in the actual costs of health care. These differences may have a
significant impact on the amount of pension and other
post-retirement benefit expenses recorded.
Accounting for derivatives. In 1998, the Financial
Accounting Standards Board (FASB), issued SFAS 133,
“Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities.” SFAS 133 was later amended by
SFAS 137 and 138 (collectively referred to as
SFAS 133). For U.S. GAAP purposes only, we use the
criteria in SFAS 133, as amended and interpreted, to
determine if certain contracts must be accounted for as
derivative instruments. The rules for determining whether a
contract meets the criteria for derivative accounting are
numerous and complex. As a result, significant judgment is
required to determine whether a contract requires derivative
accounting, and similar contracts can sometimes be accounted for
differently. The types of contracts we currently account for as
derivative instruments are interest rate swaps and locks,
foreign currency exchange contracts, call options and swaps. We
do not account for electric capacity, gas supply contracts, or
purchase orders for numerous supply items as derivatives. If a
contract must be accounted for as a derivative instrument, the
contract is recorded as either an asset or a liability in the
financial statements at the fair value of the contract. Any
difference between the recorded book value and the fair value is
reported either in earnings or in other comprehensive income
depending on certain qualifying criteria. The recorded fair
value of the contract is then adjusted quarterly to reflect any
change in the market value of the contract. In order to value
the contracts that are accounted for as derivative instruments,
we use a combination of market quoted prices and mathematical
models. Option models require various inputs, including forward
prices, volatilities, interest rates and exercise periods.
Changes in forward prices or volatilities could significantly
change the calculated fair value of the call option contracts.
The models we used have been tested against market quotes to
ensure consistency between model outputs and market quotes. For
derivative instruments to qualify for hedge accounting under
SFAS 133, the hedging relationship must be formally
documented at inception and be highly effective in achieving
offsetting cash flows or offsetting changes in fair value
attributable to the risk being hedged. If hedging a forecasted
transaction, the forecasted transaction must be probable. If a
derivative instrument used as a cash flow hedge is terminated
early because it is probable that a forecasted transaction will
not occur, any gain or loss as of such date is immediately
recognized in earnings. If a derivative instrument used as a
cash flow hedge is terminated early for other economic reasons,
any gain or loss as of the termination date is deferred and
recorded when the forecasted transaction affects earnings.
Recoverability of intangible assets and other long-term
assets. Under U.S. GAAP, in order to test the
recoverability of intangible assets and other long term
assets,” we apply SFAS No. 144, “Accounting
for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets.” We
estimate the useful lives of intangible and other long-term
assets based on the nature of the asset, historical experience
and the terms of any related supply contracts. We test for
impairment by comparing the sum of the future undiscounted cash
flows expected to be received or derived from an asset or a
group of assets to their carrying value. If the carrying value
exceeds the future undiscounted cash flows, the impairment is
measured using an estimation of the assets’ fair value,
primarily using a discounted cash flow method. The
identification of indicators of impairment, the estimation of
future cash flow and the determination of fair values for assets
or groups of assets require management to make significant
judgments concerning the identification and validation of
impairment indicators, expected cash flows and appropriate
discount rates. A significant change to these assumptions could
impact the estimated useful lives or valuation of intangible and
other long-term assets resulting in a change to amortization
expense and impairment charges.
New U.S. GAAP Accounting Standards
In addition to the critical accounting policies discussed above
under “— Overview — Critical Accounting
Policies” and “— Critical Accounting
Policies under U.S. GAAP,” our future U.S. GAAP
results will be affected by a number of new accounting standards
that have been recently issued.
120
Certain aspects of revenue arrangements. In November
2002, the Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) reached
consensus on EITF Issue 00-21, “Accounting for Revenue
Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables.” This Issue
addresses certain aspects of the accounting by a vendor for
arrangements under which it will perform multiple
revenue-generating activities. In some arrangements, the
different revenue-generating activities (deliverables) are
sufficiently separable, and there exists sufficient evidence of
their fair values to separately account for some or all of the
deliverables (that is, there are separate units of accounting).
In other arrangements, some or all of the deliverables are not
independently functional, or there is not sufficient evidence of
their fair values to account for them separately. This Issue
addresses when and, if so, how an arrangement involving multiple
deliverables should be divided into separate units of
accounting. This Issue does not change otherwise applicable
revenue recognition criteria. The provisions of EITF 00-21
became effective for revenue arrangements entered into beginning
January 1, 2004. The adoption of EITF 00-21 did not
have a material impact on our financial position, results of
operations or cash flows.
Guarantor’s accounting and disclosure. In November
2002, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation (FIN) 45,
“Guarantor’s Accounting and Disclosure Requirements
for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of
Others — an interpretation of FASB statements 5,
57, and 107 and rescission of FASB Interpretation 34.” This
Interpretation elaborates on the disclosure to be made by a
guarantor in its financial statements regarding obligations
under certain guarantees that it has issued. FIN 45 also
clarifies that a guarantor is required to recognize, at
inception of a guarantee, a liability for the fair value of the
obligation due to the issuance of the guarantee. Disclosure
requirements are effective for financial statements of periods
ending after December 15, 2002. The adoption of the
provisions of FIN 45, effective on a prospective basis for
guarantees issued or modified after December 31, 2002, did
not have a material impact on our financial position, results of
operations, or cash flows.
Variable interest entities. In January 2003, the FASB
issued FIN 46, “Consolidation of Variable Interest
Entities — an interpretation of ARB No. 51,”
which clarifies the application of the consolidation rules to
certain variable interest entities. In December 2003, the FASB
issued a revised version of FIN 46 (FIN 46R) to
address certain technical corrections and implementation issues.
FIN 46 established a new multi-step model for the
consolidation of variable interest entities when a company has a
controlling financial interest based either on voting interests
or variable interests. Consolidation based on variable interests
is required by the primary beneficiary if the equity investors
lack essential characteristics of a controlling financial
interest or if the equity investment at risk is not sufficient
for the entity to finance its activities without additional
subordinated financial support from other parties. The primary
beneficiary of a variable interest entity is the party that
absorbs a majority of the entity’s expected losses,
receives a majority of its expected residual returns, or both,
as a result of holding variable interests. The requirements of
FIN 46 are effective January 1, 2004, and the
requirements of FIN 46R apply to entities other than
special purpose entities for the period ended December 31,2004 and to special purpose entities as of January 1, 2004.
FIN 46 and FIN 46R also provide disclosure
requirements related to investments in variable interest
entities, whether or not those entities are consolidated.
Certain of these disclosure requirements apply to all financial
statements issued after December 31, 2003, regardless of
when the variable interest entity was established. In connection
with our adoption of FIN 46R, we determined that an entity
created in connection with the securitization by Wind of its
trade receivables qualifies as a variable interest entity and
therefore consolidated this entity for U.S. GAAP purposes
effective January 1, 2004. You should read notes 4 and
26 of our consolidated financial statements for additional
details on this transaction and the related accounting
treatment. We have not identified any other entities which could
be qualified as variable interest entities.
Amendment to derivative instruments and hedging
activities. On April 30, 2003, the FASB issued FASB
Statement No. 149, “Amendment of Statement 133 on
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities,” which
amends FASB Statement No. 133, “Accounting for
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities,” to address
(1) decisions reached by the Derivatives Implementation
Group, (2) developments in other Board projects that
address financial instruments, and (3) implementation
issues related to the definition of a derivative. SFAS 149
had multiple effective date provisions depending on the nature
of the amendment to SFAS 133. The adoption of SFAS 149
did not have a significant impact on our consolidated financial
statements.
121
Financial instruments with characteristics of both
liabilities and equity. On May 15, 2003, the FASB
issued FASB Statement No. 150, “Accounting for Certain
Financial Instruments with Characteristics of both Liabilities
and Equity.” This Statement establishes standards for how
an issuer classifies and measures certain financial instruments
with characteristics of both liabilities and equity. It requires
that an issuer classify a financial instrument that is within
its scope as a liability (or as an asset in some circumstances).
Many of those instruments were previously classified as equity.
This statement was effective for financial instruments entered
into or modified after May 31, 2003, and otherwise is
effective at the beginning of the first interim period beginning
after June 15, 2003, except for mandatory redeemable
financial instruments of nonpublic entities. SFAS 150 is to
be implemented by reporting the cumulative effect of a change in
an accounting principle for financial instruments created before
the issuance date of the SFAS 150 and still existing at the
beginning of the interim period of adoption. Restatement is not
permitted. The adoption of SFAS 150 did not have a
significant impact on our consolidated financial statements.
Determining whether an arrangement contains a lease. In
May 2003, the EITF reached a consensus on EITF 01-8,
“Determining Whether an Arrangement contains a Lease.”
EITF 01-8 clarifies certain provisions of SFAS 13,
“Accounting for Leases,” with respect to the
identification of lease elements in arrangements that do not
explicitly include lease provisions. Any lease element
identified under EITF 01-8 should be accounted for under
current lease accounting literature by lessors and lessees. We
will be required to apply the provisions of EITF 01-8
prospectively to arrangements newly agreed to, modified, or
acquired in a business combination beginning January 1,2004. The adoption of EITF 01-8 did not have a significant
impact on our consolidated financial statements.
Pension disclosure. In December 2003, the FASB issued
SFAS 132 (revised 2003, SFAS 132R),
“Employers’ Disclosure about Pensions and Other
Post-retirement Benefits (revised 2003) and amendment of
FASB 87, 88, and 106”, which requires additional
disclosures about our defined benefit plans and other
post-retirement plan assets, obligations, net costs, and cash
flows. We have adopted the new disclosure requirements as of
December 31, 2003 (see note 26 to our consolidated
financial statements).
Other than temporary impairment of investments. In March
2004, the EITF reached a consensus on EITF 03-1, “The
Meaning of Other-Than-Temporary Impairment and Its Application
to Certain Investments,” EITF 03-1 addresses the
meaning of other than temporary impairment and its application
to investments classified as either available-for-sale or
held-to-maturity under SFAS 115, “Accounting for
Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities,” and
investments accounted for under the cost method or the equity
method. Although a consensus was reached on how to evaluate when
an impairment of securities or investments is other than
temporary, as well as on certain quantitative and qualitative
disclosures about unrealized losses pertaining to debt and
equity securities classified as available-for-sale or
held-to-maturity, in September 2004, the FASB decided to delay
the effective date for application of the recognition and
measurement provisions of EITF 03-1 to investments in
securities that are impaired until additional guidance is
issued. The disclosures required by EITF03-1 are effective for
fiscal years ending after December 15, 2003 (see
note 24 to our consolidated financial statements).
Applying the Equity Method of Accounting to Investments Other
than Common Stock. In June 2004, the EITF reached a
consensus on EITF 02-14, “Whether an Investor Should
Apply the Equity Method of Accounting to Investments Other than
Common Stock.” EITF 02-14 addresses the application of
the equity method of accounting to investments in other than
common stock. An investor that has the ability to exercise
significant influence over the operating and financial policies
of the investee should apply the equity method of accounting
only when it has an investment in common stock and/or an
investment that is in-substance common stock. In-substance
common stock is an investment in an entity that has risk and
reward characteristics that are substantially similar to that
entity’s common stock. We will be required to apply the
provisions of EITF 02-14 beginning January 1, 2005. We
do not expect the adoption of EITF 02-14 will have a
significant impact on our financial position, results of
operations or cash flows.
Preexisting relationships between the Parties to a Business
Combination. In October 2004, the EITF reached a consensus
on EITF 04-1, “Accounting for Preexisting
relationships between the Parties to a Business
Combination.” EITF 04-1 addresses various elements
connected to a business combination between two parties that
have a pre-existing relationship and the settlement of the
pre-existing relationship in
122
conjunction with the business combination. We will be required
to apply the provisions of EITF 04-1 to business
combinations consummated and goodwill impairment tests performed
in reporting periods beginning after October 13, 2004.
Inventory Costs. In November 2004, the FASB issued
SFAS No. 151, “Inventory Costs”
(SFAS 151), which is an amendment of Accounting Research
Bulletin No. 43, “Inventory Pricing.”
SFAS 151 clarifies that abnormal amounts of idle facility
expense, freight, handling costs and wasted materials (spoilage)
should be recognized as current period charges. The provisions
of SFAS 151 are effective for inventory costs incurred
during the fiscal year beginning after June 15, 2005 and
are applied on a prospective basis. We do not expect the
adoption of SFAS 151 to have a significant impact on our
consolidated financial statements.
Guidance in Determining Whether to Report Discontinued
Operations. In November 2004, the EITF reached a consensus
on EITF 03-13, “Applying the Conditions in
Paragraph 42 of FASB No. 144 in Determining
Whether to Report Discontinued Operations.” EITF 03-13
addresses how an ongoing entity should evaluate whether the
operations and cash flows of a disposed component have been or
will be eliminated from the ongoing operations of the entity,
and the types of continuing involvement that constitute
significant continuing involvement in the operations of the
disposed component. If continuing cash flows are determined to
be direct, then the cash flows have not been eliminated and the
operations of the component should not be presented as
discontinued operations. If continuing cash flows are determined
to be indirect, then the cash flows are considered to be
eliminated and the operations of the component should be
presented as discontinued operations. In order to determine the
significance of the continuing involvement, consideration must
be given to the ability to influence the operating and or
financial policies of the disposed component, as well as the
retention of risk or the ability to obtain benefits. We will be
required to apply the provisions of EITF 03-13 to a
component of an enterprise that is either disposed of or
classified a held for sale beginning January 1, 2005.
Share-Based Payments. In December 2004, the FASB issued
SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004), Share-Based Payment,
which is a revision of SFAS No. 123, Accounting for
Stock-Based Compensation. SFAS No. 123R supersedes APB
Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees,
and amends SFAS No. 95, Statement of Cash Flows.
Generally, the approach in SFAS No. 123R is similar to
the approach described in SFAS No. 123. However,
SFAS No. 123R requires all share-based payments to
employees, including grants of employee stock options, to be
recognized in the income statement based on their fair values.
Pro forma disclosure is no longer an option. Also,
SFAS No. 123R provides significant additional guidance
regarding the valuation of employee stock options. While
SFAS No. 123R does not require the use of a specific
option-pricing model, it does indicate that lattice models
usually will provide a better estimate of fair value of an
employee stock option. We currently prepare the pro forma
disclosures required under SFAS No. 123 using the
Black-Scholes option-pricing model.
SFAS No. 123R must be adopted no later than
January 1, 2006. Early adoption is permitted in periods in
which financial statements have not yet been issued.
SFAS No. 123R permits public companies to adopt its
requirements using one of two methods:
•
A “modified prospective“method in which compensation
cost is recognized beginning with the effective date
(a) based on the requirements of SFAS No. 123R
for all share-based payments granted after the effective date
and (b) based on the requirements of SFAS No. 123 for
all awards granted to employees prior to the effective date of
SFAS No. 123R that remain unvested on the effective
date.
•
A “modified retrospective” method that includes the
requirements of the modified prospective method described above,
but also permits entities to restate based on the amounts
previously recognized under SFAS No. 123 for purposes
of pro forma disclosures of either (a) all prior periods
presented or (b) prior interim periods of the year of
adoption.
As permitted by SFAS No. 123, we currently account for
share-based payments to employees using the APB Opinion
No. 25 intrinsic-value method. Accordingly, the adoption of
the SFAS No. 123R fair value method will affect our
results of operations. We have not yet determined the impact of
adoption of SFAS No. 123R on 2006 net income and
earnings per share. However, we do not believe the impact of
this standard on our financial position, results or operations
or cash flows will be materially different than described
123
in our disclosure of pro forma net income and earnings per share
in the Stock-Based Compensation disclosure in footnote 25.
Conditional Asset Retirement Obligations. In March 2005,
the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 47 (FIN 47)
Accounting for Conditional Asset Retirement Obligations, which
clarifies that a liability (at fair value) must be recognized
for asset retirement obligations when it has been incurred if
the amount can be reasonably estimated, even if settlement of
the liability is conditional on a future event. FIN 47 is
effective as of December 31, 2005. We are reviewing our
asset retirement obligations to determine the need to record a
liability to cover any conditional obligation. We do not expect
the adoption of FIN 47 to have a significant impact on our
consolidated financial statements.
Accounting Changes and Error Corrections. In May 2005,
the FASB issued SFAS 154, “— a Replacement
of APB Opinion No. 20 and FASB Statement No. 3”.
SFAS 154 required retrospective application to prior period
financial statements of changes in accounting principle, unless
it is impracticable to determine either the period-specific
effects or the cumulative effect of the change. SFAS 154
also redefines “restatement” as the revising of
previously issued financial statements to reflect the correction
of an error. This statement is effective for accounting changes
and corrections of errors made in fiscal years beginning after
December 15, 2005. The Company does not believe that the
adoption of SFAS 154 will have a significant impact on the
consolidated financial statements.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Cash Flow Analysis
Our primary source of liquidity is cash generated from
operations. Net cash provided by operating activities in 2004
was
€5,392 million,
as compared to
€7,173 million
in 2003. The decrease of
€1,781 million,
or 24.8%, reflected a
€1,338 million
increase in income taxes paid (excluding payments related to
certain non-recurring income tax items which had an impact on
our cash used in financing activities, as explained below),
reflecting the fact that the tax advances we pay in any given
year are determined on the basis of taxes due in the previous
year and that taxes due in 2003 were higher than those due in
2002 (largely as a result of our higher pre-tax income). The
decrease in cash provided by operating activities also reflected
a
€1,469 million
decrease in the cash effect of accounts receivable that was
primarily attributable to the start of operations of the Single
Buyer in April, to which our generating companies sell
electricity that they had previously sold to our distribution
companies. The introduction of the Single Buyer had a largely
parallel, but opposite impact on accounts payable, mainly
because our distribution companies now purchase power for sales
on the regulated market from the Single Buyer, rather than
directly from our generation companies. Nevertheless, the cash
effect of our trade accounts payable increased by only
€266 million
in 2004, as the Single Buyer effect was largely offset by the
fact that advance payments that we had received in respect of
our future performance under certain contracts (primarily at our
engineering and construction activities) had increased by
€1,084 million
in 2003, whereas they decreased by
€131 million
in 2004 (reflecting the decline in our activity at our
engineering and construction operations). The decrease in cash
provided by operating activities also reflected the
€1,265 million
negative cash effect of Equalization fund receivables (which
increased by
€1,241 million
in 2004 as compared to a decrease of
€24 million
in 2003) that was primarily attributable to the
€1,219 million
in revenues related to stranded costs that we recorded following
the European Commission’s approval of the August 2004
decree (see “— Comparability of
Information — Regulatory and Other
Developments”). The overall decrease also reflected a
€125 million
increase in the negative cash effect of net changes in reserves
for employee termination indemnities, primarily reflecting
advances to employees we made to allow them to purchase Enel and
Terna shares in the Italian retail offerings of such shares made
in 2004. These negative factors were partially offset by the
positive impact on cash provided by operating activities of a
€989 million
decline in the negative cash effect of inventories, primarily
attributable to reduced activities at our engineering and
construction business, a
€972 million
increase in income before taxes, and the
€266 million
increase in the cash effect of trade accounts payable explained
above.
Net cash used in investing activities was
€1,898 million
in 2004, as compared to
€4,695 million
in 2003. The decrease of
€2,797 million,
or 59.6%, was primarily attributable to the combination of a
significant decline in our acquisition expenditures and a
smaller, but still significant, increase in cash generated from
disposals.
124
Our investments in consolidated subsidiaries (net of cash
acquired) decreased by
€1,466 million.
In 2004, these investments totaled
€135 million
and were principally comprised of payments related to our
acquisition of the Sicilmetano Group, the Ottogas Group and the
Italgestioni Group, whereas in 2003, they had totaled
€1,601 million,
of which the largest single elements were the total of
€1,389 million
paid for the acquisition of France Télécom’s
stake in Wind and the
€168 million
paid for the acquisition of our stake in EUFR. Total cash
generated from disposals of businesses and fixed assets
increased by
€1,174 million,
totaling
€2,058 million
in 2004, largely as a result of the Terna IPO, which generated
gross proceeds of
€1,700 million,
and the disposal of NewReal, which generated gross cash proceeds
of
€216 million,
whereas in 2003 the
€884 million
of cash flows from disposals of businesses and fixed assets were
primarily attributable to the
€477 million
generated by the sale of Interpower and the
€240 million
generated by the disposal of certain municipal distribution
networks. The overall decrease in net cash used in investing
activities also reflected a
€135 million
decrease in capital expenditures, primarily due to lower
expenditures on our Brazilian transmission assets.
Net cash used in financing activities was
€3,582 million
in 2004, as compared to
€2,426 million
in 2003. The increase of
€1,156 million,
or 47.7%, in net cash used in financing activities was primarily
attributable to an increase of
€2,073 million
in the amount of dividends paid, reflecting primarily the
interim dividend of
€0.33 per
share (amounting to
€2,014 million),
that we paid in November 2004 in connection with the Terna IPO,
(please see “Item 8. Financial Information —
Other Financial Information — Dividend Policy”
for more information on this interim dividend). The increase in
cash used in financing activities also reflected an increase of
€214 million
in payments of taxes on freeing-up of reserves and tax amnesty
charges, primarily reflecting the fact that in 2004 we made
payments of
€462 million
in tax charges on write-ups of asset values effected in 2003.
The impact of this factor on these tax payments and charges was
offset in part by decreases, as compared with 2003, of
€196 million
for reserves freed up in 2002 and of
€52 million
for a tax amnesty relating to previous fiscal years. You should
read note 24 to our financial statements for a discussion
of the cash-flow treatment of these non-recurring income tax
payments under U.S. GAAP. A decrease of
€99 million
in minority capital contributions also contributed to the
increase in cash used in financing activities. The impact of
these factors on the overall result was partially offset by an
increase of
€989 million
in the cash effect of changes in our net financial debt, as we
experienced a
€1,002 million
positive cash effect from changes in debt in 2004, as compared
to a positive cash effect of
€13 million
in 2003. The changes in 2004 reflected an increase in net
short-term debt, offset in part by a decrease in net long-term
debt (please see “— Capital Resources” for
information about our short-term debt and long-term debt). The
overall increase in cash used in financing activities was also
reduced by
€241 million
in cash generated by a capital increase subscribed to by certain
of our executives in connection with their exercise of stock
options.
We met our cash requirements for our investing activities and
financing activities primarily through cash generated from
operations.
Capital Resources
We manage our financing requirements through our centralized
treasury department. Most of the financing transactions of our
divisions are centralized and netted at the Group level in order
to reduce our overall debt and interest expense. As a general
rule, external financing is incurred at the parent company level
(either directly by Enel or through a treasury vehicle with a
guarantee from Enel) in the form of bonds and other debt
securities, bank loans and lines of credit. Our treasury
department then makes cash available to Group companies on an as
needed basis through intercompany loans or current-account
arrangements. In limited circumstances, financings are
undertaken directly by our subsidiaries, including financing
incurred directly by Wind and Terna in view of the planned
reduction of our stake in such companies (see the sections
“Telecommunications” and “Transmission” in
“Item 4. Information on the Company —
Business” for additional information with respect to Wind
and Terna, respectively), and subsidized loans granted by the
European Investment Bank to our operating subsidiaries to
finance a specific project. We also issue bonds and commercial
paper through Enel Investment Holding BV, a treasury vehicle.
The principal goals of our treasury operations are to maximize
financing efficiency and minimize structural subordination
issues that would arise if significant external debt was held at
the operating subsidiary level, as well as optimizing cash flows
for all the companies of the Group on a daily basis.
125
At December 31, 2004, our outstanding long-term debt,
including current maturities, was
€21,606 million,
as compared to
€22,016 million
at December 31, 2003. The decrease of
€410 million,
or 1.9%, was primarily attributable to the fact that repayments
exceeded new borrowings. Repayments of long-term debt in 2004
totaled
€4,431 million,
and were primarily comprised of payments at scheduled
maturities, including those of a fixed rate bond issued by Enel
Investment Holding BV with a total principal amount of
€2,000 million
and a fixed rate bond issued by Enel with a total principal
amount of
€1,000 million.
The overall decrease also reflected new loans with a total
principal amount of
€3,986 million
(including a total of
€450 million
drawn down by Wind from two syndicated credit facilities), the
issue of two fixed rate bonds by Enel with a total principal
amount of
€1,500 million,
the issue of two fixed rate bonds by Terna with a total
principal amount of
€1,400 million
and the issue of a series of debt securities by Enel Investment
Holding BV with a total principal amount of
€150 million.
Also contributing to the increase was an aggregate of
€13 million
of long-term debt that Sicilmetano and Italgestioni had when we
acquired our stakes in these companies.
At December 31, 2004, our outstanding short-term debt was
€5,054 million,
as compared to
€4,632 million
at December 31, 2003. The increase of
€422 million,
or 9.0%, reflected a
€1,030 million
increase in the outstanding amount of commercial paper and a
€163 million
increase in the amount of other short-term financings which were
partially offset by a decrease of
€772 million
in funds drawn on our revolving credit lines. You should read
note 10 to our consolidated financial statements for a
further discussion of our long-term and short-term debt,
including information on maturity profiles, relevant covenants,
and other restrictions on their use.
At December 31, 2004, our net financial indebtedness, which
we calculate on the basis of our short and long-term debt
(including current maturities), less long-term guarantee
deposits, cash at banks and marketable securities, factoring
receivables and finance receivables from associated companies,
was
€24,296 million,
comprised of net long-term debt of
€20,008 million
(including current maturities) and net short-term debt of
€4,288 million.
The increase in net financial indebtedness of
€122 million,
or 0.5%, as compared to
€24,174 million
at December 31, 2003, reflected the combination of a
€602 million
increase in our net short-term debt and a
€480 million
decrease in our net long-term debt.
Although net financial indebtedness is a non-GAAP measure, it is
widely used by Italian financial institutions and securities
analysts to assess a company’s liquidity and the adequacy
of its financial structure. We therefore believe it is useful to
provide this information to investors together with, and not in
lieu of, the analysis of our outstanding debt under Italian GAAP
provided above. The following table details our net financial
indebtedness at December 31, 2003 and 2004, and provides a
reconciliation of this non-GAAP measure to “cash at banks
and marketable securities” the most directly comparable
GAAP measure appearing in our consolidated statements of cash
flows. The parenthetical references to notes following
126
particular line items in the table are to the specific notes to
our consolidated financial statements included in Item 18
where these line items are presented in greater detail.
Long-term debt (including current maturities)
(note 10):
Bank loans
11,951
11,672
Bonds
9,899
9,776
Other loans
166
158
Total Long-Term Debt (including current maturities)
22,016
21,606
Long-term guarantee deposits
(1,528
)
(1,598
)
Net Long-Term Debt (including current maturities)
20,488
20,008
Net Financial Indebtedness
24,174
24,296
We maintain committed lines of credit for
€4,000 million
(€2,170 million
of which were unused as of December 31, 2004) and
uncommitted lines of credit and other short-term borrowing
agreements with banks in Italy with maximum borrowing limits
aggregating
€2,999 million
as of December 31, 2004
(€837 million
of which were unused as of that date). In December 2003, we
entered into a new revolving committed line of credit for
€3,000 million,
of which
€1,000 million
was available for only one year (and was drawn down and repaid
in 2004). As of December 31, 2004, the remaining
€2,000 million,
which is available on a revolving basis until December 2008, had
not been utilized. The availability of funds under this facility
is conditioned upon our continued maintenance of certain ratios
of net financial indebtedness to capitalization. The weighted
average interest rate on our short-term borrowings was
approximately 2.21% as of December 31, 2004, as compared to
approximately 2.24% as of December 31, 2003. We believe
that our bank facilities, together with our portfolio of cash
and cash equivalents, are sufficient to meet our present working
capital needs.
At December 31, 2004, only 3.9% of our long-term debt
(including current maturities) was denominated in currencies
other than the euro, including the equivalent of
€600 million
of long-term debt which relates to our operating subsidiaries in
North America and Central and South America that is primarily
denominated in Brazilian reals and U.S. dollars. At the
same date, 7.2% of our long-term debt was guaranteed as to
principal and interest by the Italian government. At
December 31, 2004, 63.7% of our long-term debt bore
interest at floating rates and 36.3% bore interest at fixed
rates. To improve our mix of floating and fixed-rate
obligations, we have entered into certain interest rate hedging
transactions, particularly interest rate swaps, swaptions and
collars. Taking these hedging positions into account, we have
estimated that we are exposed to interest rate fluctuations with
respect to approximately 40.9% of our outstanding long-term
debt. Please see “Item 11. Quantitative and
Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk — Price Risk
Management and Market Risk Information” for a more detailed
discussion of our hedging policies. Without giving effect to
these arrangements, we estimate that the weighted average
interest rate on our outstanding long-term debt as of
December 31, 2004 was approximately 3.8%, as compared to
approximately 4.1% as of December 31, 2003.
127
In 2001, Wind entered into two syndicated credit facilities for
a total amount of
€7,000 million.
Under these facilities, the availability of funds and changes in
applicable interest rates are conditioned upon the maintenance
by Wind of its total net debt below certain levels and of
certain ratios of total net debt to EBITDA, and EBITDA to debt
service. As of December 31, 2004,
€6,311 million
was outstanding under these facilities. In 2003, we renegotiated
one of these facilities, with an amount of
€1,500 million,
through the assignment of the facility from the original lenders
to a primary Italian bank that agreed to provide financing at a
lower interest rate against a guarantee deposit provided by Enel
equal to the outstanding amount of the facility
(€1,500 million
as of December 31, 2004). Enel receives interest on such
deposit at the same rate applicable to the facility net of a fee
paid to the bank. In May 2005, we entered into an agreement for
the sale of Wind to Weather in a series of transactions, the
first of which we expect to take place during the summer of
2005. Accordingly, we expect to deconsolidate Wind and the
€7,000 million
in debt outstanding under these credit facilities during 2005.
Our arrangements with Weather provide that Weather will repay
the
€1,500 million
facility subject to Enel’s guarantee deposit in connection
with the closing of the first step of the sale transaction
(which we expect to occur in July 2005). Following this
repayment, we expect the guarantee deposit to be released. For
additional details regarding the agreement, please see
“Item 4. Information on the Company —
Business — The Enel Group —
Telecommunications.”
In 2003, we increased the maximum aggregate authorized amount of
our euro medium-term note program that may be outstanding at one
time to
€10,000 million
from
€7,500 million.
The terms of this program, allow both Enel and our finance
subsidiary Enel Investment Holding BV (with the guarantee of
Enel) to issue bonds to retail investors outside of the United
States and to institutional investors (including qualified
institutional buyers in the United States). In 2000, Enel issued
€750 million
of 5.875% fixed rate five year bonds. In 2002, Enel issued 11
series of euro-denominated bonds with an aggregate principal
amount of
€617 million
and three Japanese yen-denominated series of bonds with an
aggregate principal amount equivalent to
€118 million
at the date of issue. In 2003, Enel Investment Holding BV issued
nine series of euro-denominated bonds with an aggregate
principal amount of
€780 million,
one series of British pound-denominated bonds with a principal
amount of British pounds 40 million (equivalent to
€58 million
at the date of issue), and Enel issued
€750 million
of 4.75% fixed rate fifteen-year bonds and
€750 million
of 4.25% fixed rate ten-year bonds. Finally, in 2004 Enel issued
€750 million
of 4.125% fixed rate seven year bonds and
€750 million
of 5.25% fixed rate twenty year bonds, and Enel Investment
Holding BV issued one series of 5.6% fixed rate twenty five year
euro-denominated bonds with a principal amount of
€150 million.
As of December 31, 2004, an aggregate of
€5,473 million
in principal amount of notes was outstanding under our euro
medium-term note program. The currency risk relating to the
placement of the Japanese yen-denominated bonds and the British
pound-denominated bonds has been hedged through currency swaps
entered into at the date of the issue. Please see
“Item 11. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure
About Market Risk — Price Risk Management and Market
Risk Information” for a more detailed discussion of our
hedging policies. You should see note 10 to our financial
statements for additional information about our debt securities,
including maturities.
In October 2004, Terna S.p.A. issued
€600 million
of 4.25% fixed rate ten year bonds and
€800 million
of 4.90% fixed rate twenty year bonds.
In March 2005, Enel issued
€400 million
of seven year bonds with a floating interest rate equal to
Euribor plus 0.10% and
€600 million
of 3.625 % fixed rate seven year bonds under our euro
medium-term note program.
At December 31, 2004, a total of
€2,487 million
in commercial paper issued by our subsidiary Enel Investment
Holding BV with the guarantee of Enel was outstanding under a
multi-currency program with an aggregate authorized amount that,
in 2004, was increased from
€1,500 million
to
€2,500 million.
Of this outstanding amount,
€1,817 million
was denominated in euro,
€361 million
was denominated in U.S. dollars,
€66 million
in Japanese yen,
€26 million
in Swiss francs,
€31 million
in Canadian dollars and
€186 million
in British pounds. We have entered into currency swaps to hedge
foreign exchange risk in connection with the portion of this
debt denominated in currency other than the euro.
Our borrowing requirements are not seasonal.
128
We use short-term borrowing facilities in order to finance our
working capital needs, aiming at ensuring flexible and
cost-effective financing for all companies of the Group.
The following table shows the ratings of our short-term debt and
long-term debt according to Standard & Poor’s and
Moody’s Investors Service at May 20, 2005.
Long-Term
Short-Term
Rating Agency
Debt
Debt
Outlook
Standard & Poor’s
A+
A-1
Stable
Moody’s Investors Service
A1
P-1
Stable
Future Liquidity and Capital Resources
The Group has adopted formal policies and decision-making
processes aimed at optimizing the Group’s overall financial
situation and its allocation of financial resources, cash
management processes and financial risk management, as well as
ensuring sustainable levels of indebtedness.
We expect that cash flow from operations and cash received from
divestitures will continue to be the primary source of funds for
our capital expenditures and working capital requirements in
2005. We believe that our cash flow and available liquid funds
and credit lines will be sufficient to meet our anticipated cash
needs.
We expect that the following transactions have had or are likely
to have a significant effect on our liquidity and capital
resources in 2005:
•
divesting Wind and, subject to the disposition of the minority
interest we expect to acquire in Weather, ultimately exiting the
telecommunications business, having entered into an agreement
for the sale of Wind in May 2005 (please see “Item 4.
Information on the Company — Business — The
Enel Group — Telecommunication”);
•
the sale of a 29.99% stake in Terna to Cassa Depositi e
Prestiti, pursuant to a contract Enel entered into in May 2005
(please see “Item 4. Information on the
Company — Business — Overview —
Transmission”);
•
the sale, on April 5, 2005, of 13.9% of Terna’s share
capital for gross proceeds of
€568 million
in a private placement to institutional investors not registered
under the Securities Act;
•
the acquisition of a 66% interest in SE for
€840 million
(of which we have already paid
€168 million
as a deposit). Closing of this transaction is expected by the
end of 2005;
•
the distribution, expected by June 23, 2005, of an ordinary
dividend equal to
€0.36 per
share, amounting in the aggregate to approximately
€2,195 million; and
•
an additional dividend at approximately
€0.17 to
€0.20 per share,
that we expect to pay in the second half of 2005 as a result of
the expected disposal of the 29.99% stake in Terna noted above.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We do not engage in the use of special purpose entities for
off-balance sheet financing or any other purpose which results
or may result in material assets or liabilities not being
reflected in our consolidated financial statements. We do use
certain off-balance sheet arrangements with unconsolidated third
parties in the ordinary course of business, including
indemnification agreements, financial guarantees, the sale of
receivables and other arrangements under which we have or may
have continuing obligations. Our arrangements in each of these
categories are described in more detail below.
Indemnities. A number of the agreements governing our
divestiture of former subsidiaries and operations include
indemnification clauses and other guarantees, with the maximum
amount of potential liability under these contracts generally
capped at a percentage of the purchase price. These indemnities
primarily relate to potential liabilities, generally for a
limited period of time, arising from contingent liabilities in
existence at the time of the sale, as well as covering potential
breaches of the representations and warranties provided in the
contracts and, in certain instances, environmental or tax
matters. As of December 31, 2004, our maximum potential
obligations with respect to these indemnities were approximately
€1.3 billion
(as
129
compared to approximately
€1 billion
at year-end 2003). However, we have not been informed of a claim
under any of these indemnities and believe that the possibility
that any such claim would be made and prove successful is remote.
Variable Interest Entities. In 2004, in connection with
our implementation for U.S. GAAP purposes of FIN 46
(please see “— U.S. GAAP
Reconciliation — New U.S. GAAP accounting
standards”), we determined that an entity created in
connection with the securitization by Wind of its trade
receivables qualifies as a variable interest entity and
therefore consolidated this entity for U.S. GAAP purposes
effective January 1, 2004. Such consolidation had no impact
on our net income under U.S. GAAP in 2004, nor had it any
impact on our shareholders’ equity under U.S. GAAP as
of December 31, 2004, since as a result we recorded
additional assets of
€600 million
and additional liabilities of
€600 million.
You should read note 4 and note 24 to our consolidated
financial statements for additional details on this transaction
and the related accounting treatment under Italian and
U.S. GAAP.
Financial guarantees. Our off-balance sheet financial
guarantees require us to make contingent payments upon the
occurrence of certain events or changes in an underlying
instrument that is related to an asset, a liability or the
equity of the guaranteed party. These guarantees relate to
arrangements that are direct obligations, giving the party
receiving the guarantee a direct claim against us. At
December 31, 2004, we had granted guarantees totaling
€14 million
(€17 million
at December 31, 2003) comprising guarantees in favor of
Elcogas S.A., an unconsolidated company in which we have an
equity interest.
Derivative instruments. We do not hold or issue
derivative financial instruments for trading purposes. We enter
into derivative contracts to hedge our exposure to foreign
exchange risk, interest rate risk and commodity price risk.
Please see “Item 11. Quantitative and Qualitative
Disclosure About Market Risk — Price Risk Management
and Market Risk Information” for information on these
derivative contracts.
Nuclear liability. We remain liable for any damage caused
by a nuclear accident, related to certain nuclear assets we
owned, occurred before the transfer of these assets in November
2000. Please see “Item 4. Information on the
Company — Regulatory Matters — Environmental
Matters — Discontinued Nuclear Operations
and — Nuclear liability” for a discussion of this
potential liability and its maximum amount.
Contractual Obligations and Commitments
Contractual Obligations
The following table sets forth, as of December 31, 2004,
the contractual obligations of the Group with definitive payment
terms which will require significant cash outlays in the future:
Payments Due by Period
Less Than
More Than
Contractual Obligations
Total
1 Year
1-3 Years
3-5 Years
5 Years
(In millions of euro)
Long-term debt (including current maturities)
21,606
1,365
3,772
4,677
11,792
Capital (Finance) Lease Obligations(*)
—
—
—
—
—
Operating leases
2,198
331
652
683
532
Purchase obligations
32,634
4,742
5,250
4,421
18,221
Other long-term obligations
7
7
Total
56,445
6,445
9,674
9,781
30,545
(*)
We do not have capital (finance) lease obligations. In
accordance with Italian GAAP, if we had any capital
(finance) lease obligations, we would not account
separately for them, but rather would report such obligations as
part of our operating leases.
Long-term debt (including current maturities). The
amounts reported above under “Long-term debt (including
current maturities)” relate to our repayment obligations
under outstanding long-term debt including the portion of our
long-term debt with maturities lower than twelve months. For a
more detailed discussion of our long-term debt, please see
“— Liquidity and Capital Resources —
Capital Resources.” We
130
expect that our expenditures related to these commitments will
approximate an aggregate of
€9,814 million
for the period from January 1, 2005 through
December 31, 2009 of which
€3,592 million
relate to Wind (which we expect to deconsolidate during 2005).
Operating leases. The amounts reported above under
“Operating leases” include the minimal rental and
payment commitments due under such leases. We expect that our
expenditures related to these commitments will approximate an
aggregate of
€1,666 million
for the period from January 1, 2005 through
December 31, 2009.
Purchase obligations. The amounts reported above under
“Purchase obligations” include amounts related to the
following purchase obligations:
•
Commitments to suppliers of fuel. We have entered into
various fuel supply contracts, primarily for the purchase of
fuel oil and natural gas, in respect of which we will be
required to pay a total
€28,542 million.
Our aggregate expenditures related to these commitments are
expected to total
€11,045 million
for the period from January 1, 2005 through
December 31, 2009. Please see “Item 4.
Information on the Company — The Enel
Group — Generation and Energy Management —
Fuel” for information about our purchases of fuel.
•
Commitments to suppliers of electricity. We also have
unconditional purchase obligations for electric power in respect
of which we will be required to pay a total of
€3,642 million.
Our aggregate expenditures related to these commitments are
expected to total
€3,002 million
for the period from January 1, 2005 through
December 31, 2009. Please see “Item 4.
Information on the Company — The Enel
Group — Generation and Energy Management —
Purchased power” for information about our purchases of
electricity.
The amounts reported above under “Purchase
obligations” also include the following purchase
obligations of Wind (which we agreed to sell in May 2005 and
expect to deconsolidate during 2005):
•
Payable to Ferrovie dello Stato for the lease of
Telecommunications Network rights of way. Wind is required
to make payments to Ferrovie dello Stato (the Italian state
railway company) of
€233 million
under an agreement that was entered into by Infostrada in 1998
(before it was merged in Wind), for the use of the fiber optic
network owned by Ferrovie dello Stato. Wind’s aggregate
expenditures related to these commitments in 2005 are expected
to total
€31 million
(€154 million
for the period from January 1, 2006 through
December 31, 2009).
•
Payable to MEF for UMTS license. Wind is required to pay
to the MEF an additional
€217 million
over the next seven years in connection with the purchase of its
UMTS license (for which
€2,230 million
has already been paid). Wind’s aggregate expenditures
related to these commitments in 2005 are expected to total
€36 million
(€145 million
for the period from January 1, 2006 through
December 31, 2009). For additional information on
Wind’s UMTS license, please see “Item 4.
Information on the Company — Business — The
Enel Group — Telecommunications — Network
infrastructure and licenses.”
Other long-term obligations. The amounts reported above
under “Other long-term obligations” include
€7 million
related to the payment of a 19% substitute tax under a
special tax regime available in 2002.
Commitments
Although the actual amount of our capital expenditures in future
periods will depend on various factors that cannot presently be
foreseen, we expect to make capital expenditures and financial
investments of approximately
€15.3 billion
in the period from 2005 to 2009. As we are in the process of
divesting control of Terna (which with its subsidiaries
constitutes our transmission division) and Wind (which with its
subsidiaries constitutes our telecommunications division), these
expenditures do not include amounts attributable to Terna and
Wind.
Our planned capital expenditures in the period from 2005 to 2009
include:
•
Approximately
€7,750 million
(€7,850 million
including intangible assets) relating to our generation
businesses, of which
€5,770 million
(€5,860 million
including intangible assets) in Italy and
€1,980 million
abroad;
131
•
Approximately
€5,790 million
relating to our electricity distribution and sale business,
including approximately
€600 million
for our Telemanagement project;
•
Approximately
€350 million
relating to our gas distribution business; and
•
Approximately
€182 million
in our other businesses.
Please see “Item 4. Information on the
Company — Business — The Enel
Group — Capital Investment Program” for a
discussion of our capital investment program.
Trend Information
Please see “— Overview” and
“— Outlook” for information relating to
recent trends in our production, sales, costs and selling
prices, as well as events that are reasonably likely to have a
material effect on our net sales, operating income,
profitability, liquidity or capital resources, or that would
cause reported financial information not necessarily to be
indicative of future operating results or financial condition.
Please see “— Contractual Obligations and
Commitments” for a discussion of our future capital
expenditures.
Process of Transition to International Financial Reporting
Standards
Following the coming into force of European
Regulation No. 1606 dated July 2002, we and other EU
companies whose securities are traded on regulated markets in
the EU are required to adopt IFRS (known as international
accounting standards, or IAS, until May 2002) in the preparation
of our 2005 consolidated financial statements. Standards
introduced prior to the renaming of IAS as IFRS are still
referred to as IAS; we refer to the combined body of IAS and
IFRS standards as IFRS.
We will adopt IFRS for the first time in our annual comparative
consolidated financial statements for the years ended
December 31, 2004 and 2005. Accordingly, the transition
provisions of IFRS 1- First-time Adoption of IFRS (“IFRS
1”) will result in IFRS that are effective on
December 31, 2005 being applied to determine our beginning
IFRS balance sheet as of January 1, 2004 and our IFRS
financial statements for the two years ended December 31,2004 and December 31, 2005. On May 12, 2005, we
published our IFRS interim report for the quarter ended on
March 31, 2005, which has not been audited; in that report,
we restated our results for the first quarter of 2004 in
accordance with IFRS for comparative purposes. In accordance
with IFRS 1, we also included in our quarterly report a
reconciliation to IFRS of our Italian GAAP consolidated
stockholders’ equity as of January 1, 2004 and
December 31, 2004 and our net income (before minority
interest) for the year ended December 31, 2004.
The financial information below as of January 1, 2004, as
of and for the year ended December 31, 2004 and that
included in the first quarter report as indicated above, have
been prepared in accordance with those IFRS standards and IFRIC
interpretations issued and effective, or issued and early
adopted, at May 12, 2005, as if such standards were in
effect as of December 31, 2005. The IFRS standards and
IFRIC interpretations that will be applicable at
December 31, 2005, including those that will be applicable
on an optional basis, are not known with certainty at the time
we prepared this financial information. Accordingly, such
information is preliminary and is subject to change related to
new IFRS standards that become effective between May 13,2005 and December 31, 2005 and new promulgated
interpretations with regard to existing standards. In this
regard, practice with respect to the interpretations and
application of standards continues to evolve.
As permitted under IFRS 1, in adopting IFRS:
•
we did not apply retrospectively “IFRS 3 Business
Combinations” to business combinations that occurred prior
to the opening balance sheet date of January 1, 2004;
•
we restated the value of property, plant and equipment as of a
date prior to the date of our transition to IFRS, based on an
Italian GAAP revaluation, as an alternative to using historical
cost; and
•
we fully applied IAS 32 — Financial Instruments:
Disclosure and Presentation (“IAS 32”) and
IAS 39 — Financial Instruments: Recognition and
Measurement (“IAS 39”) starting from our opening IFRS
balance sheet at January 1, 2004.
132
The adoption of the new body of accounting standards involved a
reassessment not only of the accounting valuation criteria we
used in accordance with Italian GAAP, but also of the format of
our financial statements and the contents of the related notes.
In 2004, we initiated a review and evaluation of the qualitative
and quantitative impact of the adoption of IFRS, which required
the update of information systems and the development of
adequate IT support. Based on the results of the work performed,
we have determined that the following are the main differences
that are expected to have an impact on our consolidated
stockholders’ equity as of January 1, and
December 31, 2004, as restated in accordance with IFRS. As
indicated in the table below, each of these items is also
expected to have a related impact on net income (before minority
interest) for the year ended December 31, 2004.
Tangible assets and related depreciation. Adjustments to
tangible assets and related depreciation as recorded under
Italian GAAP are expected to have a positive impact on our
stockholders’ equity at December 31, 2004, of
approximately
€79 million,
primarily reflecting the following:
•
The reversal of depreciation recorded under Italian GAAP in
connection with land ancillary to buildings, which is not
permitted under IFRS, which is expected to increase
stockholders’ equity at December 31, 2004, as
calculated in accordance with IFRS, by approximately
€72 million.
•
The recalculation, made in accordance with IFRS, of the
depreciation of certain assets or parts of plants which are
being shut down, to reflect the change in their useful lives,
and the related elimination of write-downs recorded under
Italian GAAP, which is expected to increase stockholders’
equity at December 31, 2004, as calculated in accordance
with IFRS, by approximately
€56 million.
•
The application of IFRS criteria requiring that each component
of any property, plant and equipment the cost of which is
material with respect to the cost of the relevant asset as a
whole be separately accounted for and amortized, which is
expected to reduce stockholders’ equity at
December 31, 2004, as calculated in accordance with IFRS,
by approximately
€32 million,
reflecting the resulting increase in amortization.
•
The application of IFRS criteria requiring the capitalization
and depreciation of certain expenses related to estimated costs
for the future dismantling and clean-up of productive sites and
the recording of related accruals in a manner not contemplated
by Italian GAAP; related adjustments are expected to reduce
stockholders’ equity at December 31, 2004, as
calculated in accordance with IFRS, by approximately
€19 million.
Start-up, development and advertising and other intangible
assets. In contrast to practice under Italian GAAP, IFRS
requires that the majority of start-up costs and advertising
costs be recorded in the statement of operations when they are
incurred. Related adjustments are expected to reduce
stockholders’ equity at December 31, 2004, as
calculated in accordance with IFRS, by approximately
€1,372 million
(of which approximately
€1,334 million
relates to the extraordinary contributions paid to the
Electricity Industry Pension Fund in the 2000-2002 period that
we had capitalized under Italian GAAP).
Goodwill and consolidation differences. Under IFRS,
goodwill and consolidation differences may no longer be subject
to amortization, and are instead to be subjected to an annual
impairment test. This adjustment is expected to increase
stockholders’ equity at December 31, 2004, as
calculated in accordance with IFRS, by approximately
€94 million.
Derivative financial instruments. IFRS requires the use
of the fair value approach in the valuation of derivative
instruments. Related adjustments are expected to reduced
stockholders’ equity at December 31, 2004, as
calculated in accordance with IFRS, by approximately
€480 million.
Employee benefits. Under IFRS, obligations accrued to the
balance sheet date are projected into the future in order to
estimate the amount to be paid upon termination of employment,
and the present value is subsequently determined in accordance
with a specific actuarial method. The use of actuarial
calculations in the valuation of employee termination
indemnities and other post-retirement personnel compensation is
expected to reduce stockholders’ equity at
December 31, 2004, as calculated in accordance with IFRS,
by approximately
€1,336 million
(of which approximately
€1,014 million
relates to the reductions on electricity tariffs we grant to
current and retired employees who were hired before July 1996.
You should read note 2 to
133
our consolidated financial statements for a discussion of the
treatment of such tariff reductions under Italian GAAP).
Provisions for risks and charges. Under IFRS, accruals
are recorded at the value represented by the best estimate of
the amount that a company would pay to settle the obligation
and, where the effect of the time value of money is material,
the estimated cost is to be discounted to present value. Related
adjustments are expected to increase stockholders’ equity
at December 31, 2004, as calculated in accordance with
IFRS, by approximately
€168 million.
The following table sets forth our preliminary reconciliation to
IFRS of consolidated stockholders’ equity as of
January 1, 2004 and December 31, 2004, and our net
income (before minority interest) for the year ended
December 31, 2004, as recorded under Italian GAAP. As noted
above, this reconciliation is unaudited and, during the course
of this transition year, is subject to change related to new
IFRS standards that become effective between May 13, 2005
and December 31, 2005 and new promulgated interpretations
with regard to existing standards.
— Start-up, development and, advertising costs and
other intangible assets
(1,501
)
(1,372
)
138
— Goodwill and consolidation differences
—
94
103
— Derivative financial instruments
(391
)
(480
)
(29
)
— Employee benefits
(1,257
)
(1,336
)
(87
)
— Provisions for risks and charges
241
168
(73
)
— Other adjustments
(54
)
(71
)
95
Tax impact of the adjustments
938
1,006
14
Total adjustments net of tax effect
(1,694
)
(1,912
)
(85
)
IFRS
19,621
19,066
2,747
ITEM 6.
DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND EMPLOYEES
Directors
Enel’s board of directors is responsible for the management
of the Company’s business and has the power to take all
actions consistent with the corporate purpose described in the
Company’s by-laws. Enel’s board is elected for a term
of up to three years. Members are eligible for re-election. The
board must consist of no fewer than three and no more than nine
members, to which may be added a non-voting director appointed
by the MEF, although no such director has been appointed.
Enel’s board of directors, elected at its annual
shareholders’ meeting held on May 26, 2005, for a term
of three years, consists of nine members. At the May 2005 annual
meeting, the shareholders confirmed Mr. Gnudi as
Enel’s Chairman. The new board of directors appointed
Mr. Conti, who has been Enel’s chief financial officer
since 1999 (and continues to perform that function), to replace
Mr. Scaroni as Enel’s chief executive officer.
Mr. Scaroni has been appointed as chief executive officer
of Eni.
The chairman and chief executive officer are Enel’s legal
representatives. The chief executive officer generally has the
power to represent Enel within the scope of the functions
delegated to him. For specific actions or categories of actions,
the power to represent the Company can be delegated by the
holder of such
134
power to one of Enel’s employees or to third parties.
Please see “Item 10. Additional
Information — By-Laws — Board of
Directors” for additional information on the workings of
Enel’s board of directors.
The board of directors elected on May 26, 2005, will
appoint new members of the Company’s compensation committee
and internal control committee. Both committees, which were
originally established in January 2000, and subsequently renewed
in June 2002, have previously been composed of three
non-executive members, and we expect them to have a similar
composition when the new members are appointed in the near
future. The compensation committee submits to the board of
directors proposals for resolutions concerning the compensation
of the chief executive officer and the other directors holding
specific offices, as well as the resolutions concerning the
determination of the compensation criteria for senior
executives, on the basis of the recommendations of the chief
executive officer. The internal control committee has the
authority to evaluate the activity and periodic reports of both
internal and external auditors, and is primarily concerned with
verifying the adequacy of Enel’s internal controls system
and in turn reporting to the full board of directors. This
committee, which Enel established in accordance with the
corporate governance code issued by Borsa Italiana, does not
fulfill the role of the “audit committee” for purposes
of U.S. securities laws and NYSE listing standards. Please
see “Item 10. Additional Information —
Significant Differences in Corporate Governance Practices for
Purposes of Section 303A.11 of the NYSE Listed Company
Manual — Audit Committee and Internal Audit
Function.”
The MEF has confirmed that as long as it remains the
Company’s controlling shareholder, it intends to continue
to participate in the nomination and election of the board of
directors in order to protect its investment as a shareholder.
Under current law, as long as the MEF remains the Company’s
controlling shareholder, the Court of Accounts, which supervises
the financial management of government-owned entities, will
exercise certain powers to protect the financial interests of
the Italian state. For example, the Court of Accounts has the
right to inspect the Company’s financial statements and
regularly reports its findings to the President of the Senate
and the President of the Chamber of Deputies. In addition,
during this period, a non-voting representative of the Court of
Accounts may attend meetings of the Company’s board of
directors and board of statutory auditors.
In this respect, at the annual meeting held on May 26,2005, Enel’s shareholders resolved to decrease the
percentage of directors elected from the candidate list
receiving the majority of votes at the shareholders’
meeting to seven-tenths from four-fifths. Please see
“Item 10. Additional Information —
By-laws — Minority Shareholders’ Rights.”
The names of the nine members of Enel’s current board of
directors, whose appointment became effective on May 30,2005, as well as their current positions and the year each was
initially appointed as a director are set forth in the following
table.
Director, general manager (direttore generale), chief
executive officer*
2005
Fernando Napolitano
Director
2002
Gianfranco Tosi
Director
2002
Alessandro Luciano
Director
2005
Francesco Valsecchi
Director
2005
Francesco Taranto
Director
2000
Augusto Fantozzi
Director
2005
Giulio Ballio
Director
2005
*
Mr. Conti has been Enel’s chief financial officer
since 1999 (and continues to perform that function)
We have summarized below the principal business activities,
experience and other principal directorships, if any, of each of
the Company’s current directors.
135
Piero Gnudi. Piero Gnudi gained professional experience
holding numerous positions on the board of directors and the
board of statutory auditors of several major Italian companies,
including STET S.p.A. (now Telecom Italia S.p.A.), Eni (the
holding company of the Italian state-controlled energy group),
Enichem S.p.A. (a subsidiary of Eni), and Credito Italiano
S.p.A., a major Italian bank. He also served as economic advisor
to the Ministry of Productive Activities. In 1994,
Mr. Gnudi was appointed to the board of directors of IRI
S.p.A., where he held a number of positions including that of
supervisor of privatizations in 1997, those of chairman of the
board of directors and chief executive officer in 1999, and that
of chairman of the IRI Liquidation Committee from 2000 to 2002.
He is currently chairman of the board of directors of Emittenti
Titoli S.p.A., vice-chairman of Unicredit Banca d’Impresa
S.p.A., director of Unicredito Italiano, and receiver of the
Fochi Group, which is under extraordinary management. He is also
a member of the steering committee of Confindustria (the
organization representing manufacturing and service industries
in Italy) and Assonime (an association of Italian listed
companies) as well as of the executive committee of the Aspen
Institute and the Committee for Corporate Governance sponsored
by Borsa Italiana. He has been the chairman of the
Company’s board of directors since May 2002 and he also
sits on the board of directors of several of our group companies
(including Wind).
Fulvio Conti.Fulvio Conti held numerous positions in
Mobil Oil Co. in Italy and abroad from 1970 to 1991, and in a
number of Italian companies during the 1990s. He joined
Montedison in 1991, where he served from 1993 to 1996 as head of
the Montedison-Compart Group’s Finance department. He
served from 1996 to 1998 as general manager and chief financial
officer of Ferrovie dello Stato S.p.A. He held the position of
chief financial officer and general manager of Telecom Italia
S.p.A., where he also held a number of positions in Telecom
Italia group companies in 1998 and 1999. He joined Enel in 1999,
where, since then, he has been Enel’s chief financial
officer, he is also the chairman of Terna and director of a
number of our group companies, including Enel Distribuzione,
Enel Produzione and Wind. He is Enel’s chief executive
officer and general manager (direttore generale) since
May 2005.
Fernando Napolitano. Fernando Napolitano began his career
working in the marketing department at Laben S.p.A. (an
aerospace production company in the Finmeccanica Group), and
subsequently worked at Procter & Gamble Italia S.p.A.
In 1990, he joined the Italian office of Booz Allen Hamilton, a
consulting company in the management and technology sector,
where he was appointed partner and vice-president in 1998. He is
currently responsible for Booz Allen Hamilton’s Italian
operations and actively involved in international projects.
Mr. Napolitano has been a member of the committee for
surface digital television at the Ministry of Communications
since 2001 and director of the European Center for Aerospace
Research since July 2002. He has been a member of the
Company’s board of directors since May 2002.
Gianfranco Tosi. Gianfranco Tosi has been a professor at
the Polytechnic Institute of Milan since 1982 and also taught at
the University of Lecco in 1992. He has published extensively on
metallurgy, the technology of metals and other related subjects.
He has served as member of the board of directors of several
Italian companies. He has also held several positions in
associations belonging to Confindustria. He was mayor of the
city of Busto Arsizio from 1993 to 2002. He has been a member of
Enel’s board of directors since May 2002.
Alessandro Luciano. Alessandro Luciano began his career
in 1974, practicing currency law and representing leading
Italian and foreign banks. Starting in 1984, he extended his
legal practice to the telecommunications industry, where he
became a consultant of STET S.p.A., Techint S.p.A., Snam
Progetti S.p.A., and DSC Communications. From October 1998 to
March 2005, he was a commissioner of the Italian Communications
Authority, where he was a member of the board and the
Infrastructure and Networks Committee. He is currently the
Chairman of Centostazioni S.p.A., a company of the Ferrovie
dello Stato group, and, since May 2005, a member of Enel’s
board of directors.
Francesco Valsecchi. Francesco Valsecchi is a lawyer and
the author of several publications. Since November 2001, he has
been a member of the committee on the reform of Italian civil
procedure instituted by the Minister of Justice, and since March
2002, he has taught at the Civil Service School. Since December
1994, he has been an extraordinary member of the Technical
Council of the Communications Ministry, and since April 2003,
has been on the committee of experts of the High Commission for
the coordination of public finance and the tax system. From July
2002 through April 2003, he was chairman of Postecom, and holds
136
senior positions in the Poste Italiane group, in particular, he
is currently the chairman of BancoPosta Fondi SGR. He is a
member of Enel’s board of directors since May 2005.
Francesco Taranto. Francesco Taranto began his career
with a brokerage firm in Milan, and subsequently worked (from
1965 to 1982) at Banco di Napoli S.p.A. He then held numerous
managerial positions in companies operating in the mutual fund
sector, becoming head of security management at Eurogest S.p.A.
(from 1982 to 1984), and subsequently becoming general manager
of Interbancaria Gestioni S.p.A. (from 1984 to 1987). Having
moved to the Prime Group (where he worked from 1987 to 2000), he
was for a long time the chief executive officer of the
group’s holding company. He is currently a member of the
board of directors of Banca Carige S.p.A., Pioneer Global Asset
Management S.p.A. (a company of the Unicredito Group) and
Kedrios S.p.A., a company providing services to financial
companies. He has also been a member of both the steering
committee of Assogestioni and the corporate governance committee
for listed companies created by Borsa Italiana, the Italian
stock exchange. He has been a member of Enel’s board of
directors since October 2000, and he is also a member of
Wind’s board of directors.
Augusto Fantozzi. Augusto Fantozzi is a lawyer and the
founding partner of a law firm with offices in Rome, Milan,
Bologna, and Lugano, as well as a professor of tax law at
“La Sapienza” and the LUISS “Guido
Carli.” He served as Minister of Finance from January 1995
to May 1996 in Prime Minister Lamberto Dini’s
Cabinet — where for several months he also held the
offices of Minister of the Budget and Economic Planning and
Minister for the Coordination of E.U. Policies — he
was subsequently the Minister of Foreign Trade in Prime Minister
Romano Prodi’s Cabinet (from May 1996 to October 1998). A
member of the Chamber of Deputies in the thirteenth legislature
(from May 1996 to May 2001), he was chairman of the Budget,
Treasury, and Economic Planning Committee (from September 1999).
He has been vice-president of the Finance Council, president of
the Ascotributi, and a member of the Consulta of Vatican City. A
former chairman of the technical committee of the International
Fiscal Association. He has also been on the board of directors
of numerous companies, including the Benetton Group, Lloyd
Adriatico S.p.A., and Citinvest S.p.A. He is a member of
Enel’s board of directors since May 2005.
Giulio Ballio. Giulio Ballio is a professor at the Milan
Polytechnic Institute since 1975, where he held the chair of
steel constructions at the school of engineering since 1983. He
has been the president of the Institute since 2002. The author
of many publications, he has carried on an extensive scientific
activity. In 1970, he founded an engineering services company
(B.C.V. Progetti), where he has been involved in numerous
projects as designer, site engineer, and consultant, both in
Italy and abroad. From 1970 to 2000, he has been a member of the
National Research Council’s committee on regulations for
steel constructions, and a member of the board of steel experts
from 1975 to 1985, where he served as chairman in 1981 and 1982.
He was also a member of the chairman’s council of the
Italian Calibration Service from 1997 to 2002. He is a member of
Enel’s board of directors since May 2005.
137
Senior Management
The table below sets forth our executive officers who are not
also directors, their positions, the year they were appointed to
such positions and their ages as of May 31, 2005:
Year Appointed
Year Joined
to Current
Name
Age
Management Position
the Group
Position
Andrea Brentan
56
International Affairs
2002
2004
Alessandro Bufacchi
58
Information and Communication Technology
2000
2000
Vincenzo Cannatelli
52
Head of Sales, Infrastructure and Networks Division
1999
2002
Antonio Cardani
55
Audit
2000
2000
Salvatore Cardillo
55
Legal Affairs
2000
2000
Gianluca Comin
42
Communication
2002
2002
Sandro Fontecedro
60
Head of Generation and Energy Management Division
1970
2003
Sergio Mobili
64
Head of Transmission Division
1967
2002
Tommaso Pompei
62
Head of Telecommunications Division
1996
2002
Massimo Romano
45
Regulatory and Institutional Affairs
1997
1999
Paolo Ruzzini
53
Human Resources
2003
2003
Salvatore Sardo
52
Purchasing
2003
2003
Claudio Sartorelli
59
Corporate Affairs
1970
1996
Luciana Tarozzi
60
Accounting
1965
1997
We have briefly summarized below the principal business
activities and experience of our executive officers listed above.
Andrea Brentan. Andrea Brentan was a research assistant
at New York University from 1975 to 1977 and then held various
positions at GIE, an Italian power plant contractor operating
worldwide, until beginning of 1991. From 1991 to 1999 he
successively held the positions of chief financial officer,
general manager and chief executive officer at Sae Sadelmi, a
Milan-based company belonging to the ABB Group which engages in
power plant engineering, procurement and construction and
electrical generation equipment manufacturing and service. From
2000 to 2002, he was the head of the worldwide steam power plant
business at Alstom, based in Paris. He joined Enel in November
2002 as head of International Operations and Business
Development of our Generation and Energy Management Division. He
is currently head of the International department at Enel S.p.A.
Alessandro Bufacchi. Alessandro Bufacchi held several
positions in a number of Italian computer companies, including
Ing. Olivetti & C., where he served as Vice-President
Marketing of Enterprise Computer Division from 1993 to 1996,
Wang Global Italia, where he served as head of the New Business
Development department from 1998 to 1999 and Getronics S.p.A.,
where he served as head of the Enterprise Systems Division in
1999. He joined the Enel Group in 2000. He has been head of
Enel’s e-business development department since May 2000,
head of operations of Enel.it since April 2003 as well as of the
Business & Telecommunications development department
since April 2004. He has also since 2004 been head of the
Company’s Information and Communication Technology
department.
Vincenzo Cannatelli. Vincenzo Cannatelli in the 1980s
worked at STET, an Italian telecommunications holding company,
in Planning and Control. In 1987, he became general manager of
Elsag S.p.A., of the Finmeccanica Group. He subsequently served
as chief executive officer of Elsag Bailey Process Automation.
He joined the Enel Group in 1999 as chief executive officer of
the Gencos. In 2001, he became the chief executive officer of
Enel Distribuzione, and in July 2002, he was appointed chief
operating officer of each of the two business sub-divisions in
the Sales, Infrastructure and Network Division. He currently is
the chairman of Enel Distribuzione, Enel Gas, Enel Rete Gas,
Enel Sole, and Enel Energia.
138
Antonio Cardani. Antonio Cardani served as head of the
administration department of Olivetti S.p.A. from 1984 to 1995.
He served as head of the administration and finance department
of Telemedia S.p.A. from 1995 to 1997. He joined Telecom Italia
S.p.A. in 1997, where he was responsible for strategic planning
from 1997 to 1998 and for planning and organizational
development from 1998 to 2000. He has been head of Enel’s
Audit department since 2000.
Salvatore Cardillo. Salvatore Cardillo has served as the
general counsel of a number of major Italian companies,
including Aeritalia-Finmeccanica (from 1983 to 1991), Alitalia
S.p.A. (from 1991 to 1997), Edison, a subsidiary of Compart
Group-Montedison (from 1997 to 1999) and De Agostini S.p.A., a
major Italian publishing company, from 1999 to 2000. He joined
Enel in 2000 as general counsel, which is the position he still
holds.
Gianluca Comin. Gianluca Comin served as head of the
public relations department and communications department at
Montedison S.p.A. from 1999 to 2001. He also served as head of
the press relations department at Telecom Italia S.p.A. from
September 2001 to June 2002. He worked as a journalist at
“Il Gazzettino,” an Italian newspaper, from 1987
to 1999. He is also a member of the board of directors of
Syremont S.p.A., a company in the Montedison Group. In July
2002, he joined Enel as head of the Communication department,
which is the position he still holds.
Sandro Fontecedro. Sandro Fontecedro joined Enel in 1970
in the engineering department. In 1979, he became head of
maintenance services for thermal generation until 1985, when he
became manager of the Torrevaldaliga Nord thermal power plant.
In 1991, he became manager of a group of power plants, until
1997, when he assumed responsibility for a regional unit
comprising several plants. He served as head of thermal and
renewable generation from 2000 to 2003, when he was appointed
chief operating officer for the Generation and Energy Management
Division.
Sergio Mobili. Sergio Mobili began his career at Enel in
1967. He has held a number of positions within our Sales,
Infrastructure and Networks Division, including heading the
regional distribution departments in two Italian regions
(Lombardy and the Veneto). He was appointed director of
Enel’s Transmission Division in 1999, becoming chief
executive officer of Terna since its incorporation in 1999.
Tommaso Pompei. Tommaso Pompei has held positions at
several Italian companies. Until 1981, he was head of
Alitalia’s Information Technology Department. From 1982 to
1991, he was chief executive officer of Sigma, a company
specializing in the development of value-added services for
tourism and transport. In 1991 and 1992, he served as a
consultant to companies including Olivetti, IBM, CAP Gemini,
Finsiel, Pacific Telesis International and STET. In 1992, he
became chief executive officer of the Pronto Italia consortium,
and in 1994 he became chief operating officer of Italy’s
second mobile telephone operator (Omnitel Pronto Italia), during
its start-up phase, and its central director of Corporate
Affairs in 1995. He subsequently moved to the Olivetti Group,
where he was director of Telecommunications Policy and Strategy
and chairman of Olivetti Telemedia Holding. He joined the Enel
Group in November 1996. He currently is the chief executive
officer of our subsidiary Wind and head of the
Telecommunications Division.
Massimo Romano. Massimo Romano served as head of the
Public Affairs department of the Ilva Group from 1990 to 1994
and as head of the External Relations department of the Lucchini
Group from 1994 to 1997. He joined Enel in 1997, as head of the
public affairs department. In 1999, he became head of
Enel’s Regulatory and Institutional affairs department,
which is the position he still holds. He is also member of the
board of directors of Terna and of the board of the Energy and
Environmental Political and Economical Institute at the Luigi
Bocconi University. He is also the senior advisor to the task
force set by the Foreign Affairs Ministry for the
internationalization of the Italian production system.
Paolo Ruzzini. From 1992 to 1995, he was head of human
resources for the Olivetti Group. In 1996, he became director of
the Solutions Division first at Olivetti Sistemi e Servizi and
then at Olivetti Solutions (Olsy). In 1998, with the acquisition
of Olsy by Wang Laboratories, he became director of the
Solutions Integration Olivetti Wang Global business line. Before
joining Enel in July 2003 as Director of Human Resources for the
Group, he was chief executive officer of Getronics Italia S.p.A.
He is also currently a member of the board of directors of Terna.
139
Salvatore Sardo. Salvatore Sardo served from 1992 to 1997
as head of Planning and Control department of Stet S.p.A. After
the merger of Stet into Telecom Italia in 1997, he became head
of the Accounting and Control of Telecom Italia. He served as
chairman of Seat Pagine Gialle S.p.A. from 1998 to 2001. He
served as head of Real Estate and General Services department
and held numerous positions in several companies of the Telecom
Italia Group from 1999 to January 2003. He joined Enel in
February 2003 and he currently serves as head of Enel’s
Purchasing and Services department, as a member of the board of
directors of Terna and as chief executive officer of the real
estate company Dalmazia Trieste.
Claudio Sartorelli. Claudio Sartorelli joined Enel in
1970. Since then he has held a number of positions. He was
general counsel from 1996 to 2000. He has been head of
Enel’s Corporate Affairs department since 1996 and he
currently serves as secretary of Enel’s board of directors.
Luciana Tarozzi. Luciana Tarozzi joined Enel in 1965.
Since then she has held a number of positions. She was head of
Enel’s Control and Reporting department from 1996 to 1997,
and became head of Enel’s Accounting department in 1997,
which is the position she still holds. She is currently also a
director of Enelpower, Enel Distribuzione, Enel Produzione and
Enel.NewHydro.
Board of Statutory Auditors
Pursuant to the Italian civil code, in addition to electing the
board of directors, Enel’s shareholders also elect a board
of statutory auditors.
Statutory auditors remain in office for a three-year term and
may be re-elected for consecutive terms or substituted
automatically by an alternate auditor if they resign or are
unable to complete their term. Statutory auditors may be removed
only for cause and with the approval of an Italian court.
The board of statutory auditors is responsible for reviewing
Enel’s management and financial reporting and financial
condition. In conducting this review, the board of statutory
auditors has a duty to the shareholders, to whom it reports, and
to Enel. The role of the board of statutory auditors includes
reviewing the Company’s management, and, in particular,
ensuring compliance with applicable law and the Company’s
by-laws. Furthermore, the statutory auditors must ensure that
Enel maintains adequate organizational structure, internal
controls and administrative and accounting systems.
Enel’s current board of statutory auditors was appointed in
May 2004. The term of its members will expire on the date of the
annual shareholders’ meeting approving the financial
statements as of December 31, 2007. The chairman of the
board of statutory auditors, Angelo Provasoli, resigned in March
2005 due to professional engagements that arose subsequent to
his appointment, effective as of the date of the annual
shareholders’ meeting held on May 26, 2005. At the
annual meeting, Enel’s shareholders appointed Eugenio Pinto
as new chairman of the board of statutory auditors. The names of
the current members, their positions and the year during which
each was initially appointed are set forth in the following
table.
Year Initially
Name
Position
Appointed
Eugenio Pinto
Chairman
2005
Carlo Conte
Auditor
2004
Franco Fontana
Auditor
2001
Giancarlo Giordano
Alternate Auditor
2004
Paolo Sbordoni
Alternate Auditor
2004
In addition, under Italian securities regulations, the
Company’s accounts must be audited by external auditors
appointed by the shareholders. The appointment is communicated
to the CONSOB. As of the fiscal year 2004, the Company’s
external auditors for both consolidated and non-consolidated
accounts are KPMG S.p.A. Under Italian securities laws, listed
companies may not appoint the same auditors for more than three
consecutive three-year terms. At the annual meeting held on
May 26, 2005, Enel’s shareholders reappointed KPMG
S.p.A. as Enel’s external auditors for a three-year term
expiring on the date of the annual shareholders’ meeting
approving the financial statements as of December 31, 2007.
Please see “Item 10. Additional
Information — By-laws — External
Auditors.” The external auditors issue an opinion that the
140
Company’s financial statements are presented fairly in all
material respects. Their opinion is made available to the
Company’s shareholders prior to the annual shareholders
meeting.
Executive Compensation
Applicable Italian regulations (Article 78 of CONSOB
Regulation No. 11971, issued on May 14, 1999, as
amended (“Regulation No. 11971”)) require Enel to
disclose in the Company’s financial statements the
following information regarding the compensation for 2004 of
each of the directors and statutory auditors who served in such
year. The following amounts include compensation paid to such
persons by Enel’s subsidiaries. The current members of
Enel’s board of directors, as well as the chairman of the
board of statutory auditors, were appointed on May 26,2005, at the annual meeting of Enel’s shareholders.
Enel’s shareholders also set the directors’ individual
base compensation in an amount equal to
€85,000 per
year; the compensation of the chairman of the board of directors
and the chief executive officer will be set by the board of
directors, after having consulted the board of statutory
auditors in accordance with the Company’s by-laws. The
compensation of the new chairman of the board of statutory
auditors, who replaced Mr. Provasoli after his resignation,
was set by Enel’s shareholders at the annual meeting of
May 21, 2004, and has not been modified.
Base
Bonuses and
Non-Monetary
Other
Name
Positions(s) Held
Compensation
Other Incentives
Benefits
Compensation
(In euros)
Current and former directors
Piero Gnudi
Chairman
659,513.36
386,000.00
(1)
10,378.38
(2)
Paolo Scaroni
Chief executive officer, general manager, director(5)
705,164.60
1,702,000.00
(3)
64,869.62
(2)
909,032.87
(4)
Mauro Miccio
Director(5)
109,829.12
Franco Morganti
Director(5)
107,763.28
73,500.00
(6)
Fernando Napolitano
Director
109,829.12
Francesco Taranto
Director
118,837.35
28,500.00
(7)
Gianfranco Tosi
Director
107,763.28
Total compensation of Directors
1,918,700.11
2,088,000.00
75,248.00
1,011,032.87
Current and former statutory auditors
Bruno De Leo
Chairman(8)
30,470.99
Angelo Provasoli
Chairman(9)
51,041.67
(10)
Gustavo Minervini
Statutory Auditor(8)
24,617.80
Franco Fontana
Statutory Auditor
69,834.36
Carlo Conte
Statutory Auditor(11)
44,958.33
(12)
Total compensation of Statutory Auditors
220,923.15
Total compensation paid
2,139,623.26
2,088,000.00
75,248.00
1,011,032.87
For all positions held at Group companies other than Enel, the
compensation of Piero Gnudi and former chief executive officer,
Paolo Scaroni, has either been renounced by them or paid to Enel
and included in their base compensation.
(1)
This amount is composed of:
(i) €186,000.00
as a variable part of the base compensation relating to fiscal
year 2003, resolved upon and paid in 2004, and
(ii) €200,000.00
as a bonus granted for the achievement of targets in the
MEF’s sale of Enel’s shares in October 2004. On
March 30, 2005, Enel’s board of directors granted the
chairman
€186,000.00 as
variable part of the base compensation for fiscal year 2004 for
the achievement of Enel’s Group objectives in 2004.
(2)
Insurance policies.
141
(3)
This amount is composed of:
(i) €490,000.00
as a variable part of the base compensation relating to fiscal
year 2003, resolved upon and paid in 2004,
(ii) €512,000.00
as a bonus entry compensation,
(iii) €50,000.00
as extraordinary compensation for services rendered in 2003 as
chief operating officer ad interim in the Generation and
Energy Management Division, resolved upon and paid in 2004, and
(iv) €650,000.00
as bonus granted for the achievement of targets in the
MEF’s sale of Enel’s shares in October 2004. On
March 30, 2005, Enel’s board of directors granted
Mr. Scaroni
€700,000 as
variable part of the base compensation for fiscal year 2004 for
the achievement of Enel’s Group objectives in 2004.
(4)
This amount is composed of:
(i) €601,032.87
as base compensation for services rendered as general manager in
2004, and
(ii) €308,000.00
as a variable part of the base compensation relating to fiscal
year 2003, paid in 2004.
On March 30, 2005, Enel’s board of directors granted
Mr. Scaroni, in his capacity as general manager at that
time, €600,000.00
as a variable part of the base compensation for fiscal year 2004
for the achievement of Enel’s Group objectives in 2004.
(5)
Former member of Enel’s board of directors.
(6)
Compensation paid for services rendered to Wind, as director
(for the amount of
€28,500.00) and
for certain non-managerial tasks delegated to him by the board
of directors in his capacity as director (for the amount of
€45,000.00).
Mr. Morganti ceased to perform these tasks, effective as of
March 24, 2005.
(7)
Compensation paid as a director of Wind.
(8)
Former member of Enel’s board of statutory auditors.
(9)
Former member of Enel’s board of statutory auditors
(10)
This compensation was paid for the services rendered by
Mr. Provasoli from May 2004 through December 2004.
(11)
For services rendered starting from May 2004.
(12)
Compensation paid to the MEF (for the amount of
€33,458.33)
pursuant to the directive of Council of Ministers —
Public Office department (Dipartimento della Funzione
Pubblica) of March 1, 2000.
There are no service contracts entered into by Enel’s
directors with Enel or any of its subsidiaries providing for
benefits upon termination of employment.
We do not disclose to the Company’s shareholders or
otherwise make available public information as to the
compensation of the Company’s executive officers.
The aggregate compensation Enel and its subsidiaries paid to all
of Enel’s directors, senior managers and statutory auditors
identified in this annual report, excluding pension, retirement
or similar benefits, for the year ended December 31, 2004,
was approximately
€14.6 million.
The aggregate amount paid or accrued for pension, retirement or
similar benefits for the same directors, statutory auditors and
executive officers for the year ended December 31, 2004,
was approximately
€2.8 million.
In addition, Enel’s current chief executive officer
Mr. Conti, in his capacity as chief financial officer, was
granted:
•
in April 2001, 621,280 options to purchase the same number of
Enel’s ordinary shares, under the 2001 stock option plan.
Of these options, 56% vested and, consequently, 347,917 options
were exercisable starting in 2004. These options expire on
December 31, 2005. The exercise price for these options is
€7.272. As of
May 13, 2005, Mr. Conti has not exercised any of these
options;
•
in March 2002, a further 902,500 options to purchase the same
number of Enel’s ordinary shares, under the 2002 stock
option plan. All these options vested and, consequently, 30% of
the options were exercisable starting in 2003, an additional 30%
starting in 2004 and the remaining 40% starting in 2005. These
options expire on December 31, 2007. The exercise price for
these options is
€6.426. During
the period between May 24, 2004, and June 11, 2004,
Mr. Conti exercised 250,000 of these options and sold the
resulting shares on the market. Subsequently, during the period
between November 12, 2004, and December 2, 2004,
Mr. Conti exercised a further 175,000 of these options, and
between February 3, 2005, and February 23, 2005, a
further 141,500 of these options and sold all of the resulting
142
shares on the market. As of May 13, 2005, Mr. Conti
has not exercised any of the remaining 336,000 options;
•
in April 2003, a further 992,800 options to purchase the same
number of Enel’s ordinary shares, under the 2003 stock
option plan. All these options vested and, consequently, 30% of
the options are exercisable starting from 2004, an additional
30% starting from 2005 and the remaining 40% starting from 2006.
These options expire on December 31, 2008. The exercise
price for these options is
€5.240. During
the period between May 24, 2004, and June 11, 2004,
Mr. Conti exercised 297,840 of these options and sold the
resulting shares on the market. Subsequently, during the period
between February 3, 2005, and February 23, 2005,
Mr. Conti exercised a further 200,000 of these options and
sold the resulting shares on the market. As of May 13,2005, Mr. Conti has not exercised any of the remaining
494,960 options;
•
in March 2004, a further 600,000 options to purchase the same
number of Enel’s ordinary shares, under the 2004 stock
option plan. All these options vested and, consequently, 15% of
the options may be exercised starting from 2005, another 15%
starting from 2006, an additional 30% starting from 2007 and the
remaining 40% starting from 2008. These options expire on
December 31, 2009. The exercise price for these options is
€6.242. As of
May 13, 2005, Mr. Conti has not exercised any of these
options;
•
in March 2005, a further 600,000 options to purchase the same
number of Enel’s ordinary shares, under the 2005 stock
option plan. Subject to the satisfaction of the conditions
precedent provided for in the 2005 stock option plan, 15% of the
options may be exercised starting from 2006, another 15%
starting from 2007, an additional 30% starting from 2008, and
the remaining 40% starting from 2009. These options expire on
December 31, 2010. The exercise price for these options is
€7.273.
In addition, Enel’s former chief executive officer,
Mr. Scaroni, in his capacity as general manager
(direttore generale), had been granted a number of stock
options, which he retains following his departure from the Enel
Group, as follows:
•
in September 2002, 2,503,500 options to purchase the same number
of Enel’s ordinary shares, under the 2002 stock option
plan. All these options vested and, consequently, 30% of the
options were exercisable starting in 2003, an additional 30%
starting in 2004 and the remaining 40% starting in 2005. These
options expire on December 31, 2007. The exercise price for
these options is
€6.480. During
the period between May 24, 2004, and June 11, 2004,
Mr. Scaroni exercised 1,502,100 of these options and sold
the resulting shares on the market. Subsequently, during the
period between February 3, 2005, and February 23,2005, Mr. Scaroni exercised the remaining 1,001,400 of
these options and sold the resulting shares on the market;
•
in April 2003, a further 4,200,000 options to purchase the same
number of Enel’s ordinary shares, under the 2003 stock
option plan. All these options vested and, consequently, 30% of
the options are exercisable starting from 2004, an additional
30% starting from 2005 and the remaining 40% starting from 2006.
These options expire on December 31, 2008. The exercise
price for these options is
€5.240. During
the period between May 24, 2004, and June 11, 2004,
Mr. Scaroni exercised 1,260,000 of these options and sold
the resulting shares on the market. Subsequently, during the
period between February 3, 2005, and February 23,2005, Mr. Scaroni exercised a further 1,260,000 of these
options and sold the resulting shares on the market. As of
May 13, 2005, Mr. Scaroni has not exercised any of the
remaining 1,680,000 options;
•
in March 2004, a further 2,500,000 options to purchase the same
number of Enel’s ordinary shares, under the 2004 stock
option plan. All these options vested and, consequently, 15% of
the options may be exercised starting from 2005, another 15%
starting from 2006, an additional 30% starting from 2007 and the
remaining 40% starting from 2008. These options expire on
December 31, 2009. The exercise price for these options is
€6.242. During
the period between April 20, 2005, and May 13, 2005,
Mr. Scaroni exercised 375,000 of these options and sold the
resulting shares on the market.
•
in March 2005, a further 2,500,000 options to purchase the same
number of Enel’s ordinary shares, under the 2005 stock
option plan. Subject to the satisfaction of the conditions
precedent provided for in the 2005 stock option plan, 15% of the
options may be exercised starting from 2006, another 15%
143
starting from 2007, an additional 30% starting from 2008, and
the remaining 40% starting from 2009. These options expire on
December 31, 2010. The exercise price for these options is
€7.273.
Please see “Item 10. Additional
Information — Stock Option Plans” for a complete
description of the Company’s stock option plans.
Share Ownership
The following table sets forth the number of Enel’s
ordinary shares held by each of the Company’s directors and
statutory auditors as of May 31, 2005:
46,000 of which are held by a company controlled by
Mr. Gnudi and 24,262 by Mr. Gnudi’s wife.
(2)
262 of which are held by Mr. Conti’s wife.
(3)
All of these shares are held by Mr. Ballio’s wife.
Employees
As of December 31, 2004, we had 61,898 employees, of whom
705 held managerial positions. The following table shows the
breakdown of employees in each of our principal segments at
December 31, 2004.
Number of
Employees
Division
Generation and Energy Management
10,828
18%
Sales, Infrastructure and Networks
35,537
57%
Transmission
2,929
5%
Telecommunications
8,188
13%
Services and Other Activities
3,826
6%
Holding Company
590
1%
Total Enel Group
61,898
100%
In recent years, we have pursued a policy of workforce
rationalization, primarily through attrition, which has resulted
in a steady reduction in employment levels: the number of our
employees has declined by 30.4%, from 88,957 at
December 31, 1997, to 61,898 employees at December 31,2004.
Based on the current retirement system available to our
employees, the Company’s management estimates that the
following number of employees will retire during each of the
periods shown:
Estimated Number of
Potential Retirees
2005
2,200
2006
1,800
2007
1,300
2008
1,000
2009
1,100
If Italy’s current system of governmental retirement
benefits changes significantly, we will consider adopting other
voluntary measures to reduce employment levels. These measures
may involve increased costs.
144
The increased use of automated, remote-controlled plants and of
advanced information technology and other rationalization
measures has improved our ability to conduct operations with
fewer employees.
The table below shows our employment levels for each of the
years indicated. The table does not take into account the
employees of our telecommunications segment during the year
2000, prior to our consolidation of Wind.
Most of our non-management employees in the electricity sector
in Italy are members of labor unions. The principal labor unions
are the National Federation of Energy Workers, to which
approximately 33% of our employees belong, the Italian
Electrical Companies Federation, to which approximately 30% of
our employees belong, and the Italian Union of Chemical,
Electrical and Manufacturing Workers, to which approximately 9%
of our employees belong. Other employees are members of smaller
labor unions, none of which includes more than 2% of our
employees. Typically, we and representatives of the three unions
covering the largest number of our employees negotiate and enter
into a single collective bargaining agreement every four years.
Representatives of the smaller unions typically sign the same
agreement at a later date. Under the collective bargaining
agreement, wages and other compensation arrangements are
negotiated every two years.
In July 2001, we signed a collective bargaining agreement for
employees in the electricity industry with the unions, Gestore
della Rete and So.g.i.n. This collective bargaining agreement
for all electric employees also applies to independent power
producers and to municipally owned electric utilities. This
contract expires as to both the economic and other terms at the
end of June 2005.
Under the terms of the collective bargaining agreements
currently in effect, we may terminate covered employees only
when they reach retirement age or for cause. We believe that we
can achieve our workforce rationalization objectives principally
through attrition.
We believe that our relations with the unions are generally
satisfactory. Our employees have the right under Italian law to
strike, although the unions have guaranteed that in such event a
minimum level of service will be provided in each of the
generation, transmission and distribution segments. We are party
to a national agreement with the principal labor unions that
regulates the exercise of our employees’ right to strike.
As a consequence, strikes or other work stoppages have not
significantly affected our operations in recent years. In 2004,
as part of a national initiative to bring the agreement in line
with legislative and regulatory developments that have occurred
since the contract was first signed in 1991, employers and the
trade unions proposed modifications to the terms of this
contract, including a proposal by the unions to reduce the level
of certain service guarantees. Negotiations on a new regulatory
framework in this area are continuing in 2005.
Employee compensation is based in part on seniority and the
position held by each employee. In addition, our employees are
covered by a collective agreement with the main Italian unions
on bonuses, which was renewed in 2004. This agreement provides
for employee bonuses based on our general profitability, and is
paid out to middle management and employees, as well as for
bonuses tied to productivity and quality targets set for
individual divisions or companies within the Group.
Following Enel’s official entry in 2004 into Confindustria,
the Italian association of industrial companies, we became party
to a national labor contract with unions representing the
managers of manufacturing and service companies. We do not
expect this contract to have a material effect on our
relationship with our managers.
For our senior and junior management, compensation is based on
performance, largely through a “management by
objective” system with certain correction mechanisms to
ensure that compensation does not significantly depart from
market levels. This compensation method applied to approximately
80% of our management in 2004. For top managers, the variable
component of compensation accounts for approximately
145
33% of total compensation. Salary incentives based on sales have
also been introduced for account managers of certain companies
of the Enel Group.
Employee benefits
We sponsor retirement plans that pay pension benefits as
required by Italian law and our collective bargaining
agreements. The costs related to these plans are expensed as the
benefits vest. In addition, our employees are eligible, upon
termination, for severance pay under Italian law. We accrue a
reserve for these employee termination liabilities, net of
applicable advances, over the employees’ service periods.
In 1999, the Italian parliament enacted a law that required the
government to terminate industry specific retirement funds such
as the Electricity Fund, which was terminated on January 1,2000. As a result, most of our employees, who were enrolled in
the Electricity Fund, have been enrolled in the general pension
fund for Italian employees. In 2002, we were required to make
the last extraordinary contributions to the general pension fund
to eliminate the deficit in the Electricity Fund. The net impact
of this change on our cash flow over the three-year period from
2000 to 2002 was
€1,940 million.
This impact reflected the effect of lower payments we made to
the national pension system in respect of the family benefits
program, following the January 2000 reduction of
3.72 percentage points in the rate on which our payments
are based. For Italian GAAP purposes, we are expensing the
amounts paid in the years 2000-2002 proportionately over the
twenty-year period between 2000 and 2019. However, for
U.S. GAAP purposes, we expensed these amounts in 2000-2002,
during the year that the contributions were due. The difference
between the treatment of these payments under Italian GAAP and
U.S. GAAP therefore had a significant negative effect on
our U.S. GAAP results in each of those three years. Please
see “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and
Prospects — U.S. GAAP Reconciliation.”
ITEM 7.
MAJOR SHAREHOLDERS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Major Shareholders
Prior to Enel’s initial public offering in November 1999,
the MEF had been Enel’s sole shareholder since Enel was
incorporated in July 1992. Before that date, Enel had been a
public statutory body owned by the Italian government.
Enel’s initial public offering consisted of a total of
3,848,802,000 ordinary shares (corresponding to 1,924,401,000
ordinary shares after the one-for-two reverse stock split
effective July 9, 2001) in the form of ordinary shares and
ADSs (each representing ten ordinary shares at the time of the
offering, and five ordinary shares after the one-for-two reverse
stock split). The offering of the Company’s shares was the
second-largest in history at the time and generated gross
proceeds of approximately
€16,550 million.
On November 4, 2003, the MEF announced its sale of
400,000,000 of Enel’s ordinary shares (then approximately
6.6% of the Company’s share capital) to Morgan
Stanley & Co. International Limited for
€2,172.8 million.
The MEF also announced that Morgan Stanley & Co.
International Limited had informed the MEF that it had placed
the entire amount of shares purchased with Italian and
international investors.
On December 12, 2003, the MEF sold 627,528,282 of
Enel’s ordinary shares (then approximately 10.35% of the
Company’s share capital) to Cassa Depositi e Prestiti, then
a wholly owned subsidiary of the MEF, for total consideration of
approximately
€3,156 million.
On December 30, 2003, the MEF announced the placement of
shares representing 30% of the share capital of Cassa Depositi e
Prestiti to 65 Italian bank foundations. As a result, the MEF
now owns 70% of Cassa Depositi e Prestiti.
On October 23, 2004, the MEF announced that it had sold
1,150,000,000 shares, or 18.86% of the Company’s share
capital, in a public offering in Italy and a private placement
to institutional investors not registered under Securities Act,
and announced in March 2005 that it intends to sell a further
interest of approximately 10% in the Company in a similar
offering by September 2005, market conditions permitting.
As of May 13, 2005, the MEF owned 1,919,635,842 of
Enel’s ordinary shares, or 31.34% of the total number of
outstanding ordinary shares, and Cassa Depositi e Prestiti owned
627,528,282 of Enel’s ordinary shares, or 10.25% of the
outstanding ordinary shares. As of the same date, no other
entity or individual held 2% or more of the Company’s
outstanding ordinary shares.
146
The MEF or Cassa Depositi e Prestiti may sell part of
Enel’s shares at any time. There are no minimum ownership
or similar requirements under Italian law that would limit sales
of Enel’s shares by the MEF or Cassa Depositi e Prestiti.
Within the context of the privatization procedures and
regulations under Italian law, the MEF may, as a significant
shareholder, ask Enel’s board of directors to examine the
possibility of dispositions, in whole or in part, of some
entities we control. Enel’s board would implement any such
transaction solely to enhance value for all shareholders.
The MEF has indicated that it intends to continue to participate
in the nomination and election of Enel’s board of directors
to protect its investment as a shareholder. Under the 1994
privatization law, as recently amended by article 4,
paragraph 227, of Law 350 of December 24, 2003 (the
2004 Budget Law), the MEF has special powers, regardless of the
level of its shareholding in Enel, related to:
•
The material acquisition of Enel’s shares by third parties;
•
Material shareholders’ agreements;
•
Major corporate changes; and
•
The appointment of one non-voting director.
In addition, the privatization law provides that Enel’s
by-laws may include:
•
Special rules concerning appointments of directors and statutory
auditors in order to ensure that minority shareholders are
represented; and
•
Limitations on the maximum number of shares that a shareholder,
or group of shareholders, other than the MEF (or other entities
controlled by the Italian state), may hold.
Certain provisions of Enel’s by-laws, as well as the
special powers the MEF retains, are described in more detail in
“Item 10. Additional Information —
By-Laws.”
Since certain of the shares and ADSs were held by brokers or
other nominees, the number of direct record holders in the
United States may not be fully indicative of the number of
direct beneficial owners in the United States or of where the
direct beneficial owners of such shares are resident.
As of May 13, 2005, 6,124,838,588 ordinary shares were
outstanding. As of the same date, there were 13,639,655 ADSs
(equivalent to 68,198,275 ordinary shares) held by 9 record
holders (including The Depository Trust Company).
Related Party Transactions
As the entity primarily responsible for electricity generation,
transmission and distribution in Italy, we provide services to
many other state-owned entities. The rates charged to these
entities are comparable to those charged to other commercial
organizations.
Under the current regulatory framework, we enter into certain
transactions with the Gestore della Rete, the Single Buyer and
the Market Operator (each of which is wholly owned, directly or
indirectly, by the MEF, the Company’s controlling
shareholder). Prices and fees paid to the Gestore della Rete in
connection with these transactions are determined by the Energy
Authority, as are certain of the prices and fees that we pay to
the Market Operator. Transactions entered into with the
Market Operator on the Italian power exchange and sales to the
Single Buyer are effected at market prices. Revenues generated
from the sales of electricity to the Gestore della Rete in 2004
represented approximately 5% of our total operating revenues for
the year. Revenues generated from sales to the Market Operator
and Single Buyer during the year represented approximately 8%
and 5% of our total operating revenues, respectively.
We also make various payments to the Gestore della Rete, the
Single Buyer and the Market operator in connection with our
electricity operations. In 2004, our Sales, Infrastructure and
Networks Division purchased electricity from the Single Buyer
and the Gestore della Rete, and also paid fees to the Gestore
della Rete for the use of the national electricity transmission
grid. The expenses arising from this division’s purchases
from the Single Buyer represented approximately 24% of our total
operating expenses in 2004, while the fees paid to the Gestore
della Rete by this division represented approximately 3% of our
total operating expenses for the
147
year. Our Generation and Energy Management Division in 2004 also
paid fees to the Gestore della Rete for access to the national
electricity transmission grid and purchased electricity from the
Market Operator in amounts that in the aggregate represented
approximately 3% and 2% of our total operating expenses for the
year, respectively.
The Transmission Division earns revenue from a fee per kWh of
electricity transported that distributors and suppliers pay to
Terna through the Gestore della Rete. The revenues relating to
these fees represented approximately 2% of our total operating
revenues in 2004.
We purchase fuel for our generation plants and gas for our sales
and distribution activities from Eni, an Italian oil and gas
company in which the MEF has a controlling stake. Total
purchases from Eni represented approximately 5% of total
operating expenses in 2004.
In all, purchases from (and fees paid to) other companies wholly
or partly owned by the Italian state accounted for approximately
37% of our total operating expenses in 2004.
You should read note 23 to our consolidated financial
statements for additional information.
We make loans available to our employees, excluding executive
officers, up to an amount of
€52,000 per
employee.
We have adopted corporate governance guidelines aimed at
ensuring that potential transactions with related parties are
carried out in a procedurally and substantively fair manner.
ITEM 8.
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Consolidated Financial Statements
Please see “Item 18. Financial Statements” of
this annual report.
Other Financial Information
Legal Proceedings
We are defendants in a number of legal proceedings incidental to
the generation, transmission and distribution of electricity.
While we do not expect these proceedings, either individually or
in the aggregate, to have a material adverse effect on our
financial position or results of operations, because of the
nature of these proceedings, we are not able to predict their
ultimate outcomes, some of which may be unfavorable to us.
Please see “Item 3. Key Information — Risk
Factors — Other Risks Related to Our
Businesses — We are defendants in a number of legal
proceedings.”
Our pending legal proceedings include various civil and
environmental claims and disputes relating to the construction
and operation of several power stations, transmission and
distribution lines, tax assessments, and other matters that
arise in the normal course of our business. We have established
a reserve for litigation and other contingent liabilities where
we consider it probable that a claim will be resolved
unfavorably and where we can reasonably estimate the potential
loss involved. This reserve, which also includes provisions for
other contingencies and uncertainties related to our operations,
is included in other non-current liabilities in the consolidated
balance sheets in our consolidated financial statements, and
amounted to
€1,283 million
at December 31, 2004, of which
€382 million
related to legal proceedings.
We have briefly summarized below the most significant of these
proceedings.
Electromagnetic field proceedings. We are currently
defendants in numerous pending proceedings relating to the
electromagnetic fields created by our transmission and
distribution lines and in some pending proceedings relating to
electromagnetic energy emanating from substations. In most of
the proceedings, the plaintiffs seek the relocation or removal
of lines or substations that are near to inhabited or occupied
residential or office buildings. In a limited number of
proceedings, the plaintiffs also seek damages based on our
alleged non-compliance with regulations setting maximum exposure
levels or minimum distance requirements for lines and
substations or on the alleged health effects of exposure to
electromagnetic fields.
Alleged damage as a result of exposure to electromagnetic fields
created by transmission and distribution lines has also been the
subject of certain criminal proceedings in which we are
involved. In June 1999, the
148
criminal court of Rimini fined us symbolic damages of
approximately
€1,000 in one
proceeding and transferred the case to the civil court for the
quantification of the physical damage to the individual
plaintiff. The Court of Appeals overturned this decision on
grounds that the claim was time barred. We are nonetheless
currently seeking a declaration of full innocence from the
Supreme Court.
In the cases described above, the transmission and distribution
lines in question are in compliance with all applicable laws.
Moreover, we believe that certain of such proceedings have
become moot as a result of a law enacted in March 2001, which
replaced previous legislation on electromagnetic fields and
introduced measures for the restructuring of the national
electricity transmission grid. In any event, if the outcome of
the above civil cases is unfavorable to us, our potential
liability would be limited mainly to damages, to the extent
plaintiffs have satisfied their burden of proof by demonstrating
a causal connection between electromagnetic fields and the
alleged damage. Please see “Item 3. Key
Information — Risk Factors — Risks Relating
to Our Energy Business — Our core energy business and
other activities are subject to numerous environmental
regulations that could significantly affect our financial
condition and results of operations” and “Item 4.
Information on the Company — Regulatory
Matters — Environmental Matters —
Electromagnetic fields” for a more detailed discussion of
electromagnetic fields.
Blackout litigation. Italy, with the exception of
Sardinia, suffered a complete blackout of electrical service on
September 28, 2003. Approximately 21 hours were
necessary before electricity became available again to all
customers. A joint report on the blackout by the Energy
Authority and the French Commission de Régulation de
l’Energie, dated April 22, 2004, includes among the
causes of the blackout inappropriate defense measures taken by
the Swiss transmission grids, the non-compliance by certain
Swiss electricity companies with the rules provided by the Union
for the Co-ordination of Transmission of Electricity
(UCTE) and inappropriate measures taken to cure certain
malfunctions. Other inquiries by Swiss, French and Italian
authorities are still underway.
As of May 2005, approximately 1,700,000, mainly household,
customers have requested reimbursement of approximately
€25 each, in
accordance with pre-existing Energy Authority rules, despite the
fact that in October 2003, the Energy Authority had issued a
release in which it declared that customers are not entitled to
such reimbursement in connection with the blackout. We believe
that we were not responsible for the blackout and, accordingly,
have not honored any of these requests. In addition, as of May
2005, approximately 30,000 of our customers have brought legal
actions against Enel Distribuzione or Enel in the Italian courts
seeking aggregate damages of approximately
€30 million.
So far, the courts have issued approximately 2,300 decisions,
approximately two-thirds of which have been unfavorable to us.
We have appealed and intend to appeal all unfavorable decisions.
Although the claims of each of the individual plaintiffs are for
relatively minor amounts, an increase in the decisions holding
us responsible for such damages could result in an increase in
the number of such claims and the magnitude of damages sought.
Italian law does not provide for the award of punitive damages
in such cases, and plaintiffs will be limited to compensatory
damages.
On June 9, 2004, the Energy Authority published a
preliminary report that, while not making any definitive finding
regarding responsibility, raised the possibility that the
blackout may have been partially attributable to the conduct of
a number of Italian generation, distribution and transmission
companies, including members of the Enel Group. On
September 9, 2004, the Energy Authority initiated a formal
proceeding to determine whether any of the companies identified
in the report (including Enel Produzione, Enel Distribuzione,
Terna and Deval) were actually responsible. At the close of its
inquiry (currently expected by July 31, 2005, for the
portion relating to generating companies, and by
November 30, 2005, for that relating to transmission and
distribution companies), the Energy Authority could impose
sanctions on, or request undertakings from, operators it holds
at fault in the incident.
We believe that the blackout, given its intensity and nature,
should be considered an unforeseen and unforeseeable event. As a
result, we do not believe we should be held liable for this
event. Furthermore, we believe that the occurrence of the
blackout is outside the scope of the indemnity obligations
provided for under our electricity supply contracts and the
Energy Authority’s regulations.
Brown-out litigation. The Italian electricity supply
experienced certain disruptions on June 26, 2003. These
disruptions, which we effected upon request of the Gestore della
Rete, were defense procedures carried out when the electricity
available cannot satisfy demand, and are intended to prevent the
entire electricity
149
system from collapsing. The disruptions lasted for approximately
90 minutes each and concerned an aggregate of approximately
7 million customers. The Energy Authority’s initial
inquiry into these disruptions was completed in November 2003.
In its December 2003 report, the Energy Authority primarily
attributed the low amount of electricity available, which
resulted in the adoption of these defense procedures, to certain
structural causes, including insufficient domestic generation
capacity, the resulting dependence of the Italian electricity
system on imported electricity, and the reduction of the
available interconnection capacity available attributable to a
heat wave, as well as to certain specific conditions (including
an 800 MW reduction of imports of electricity from France
under an import agreement between Enel and EDF). The Energy
Authority censured the Gestore della Rete and generation
companies, including us, arguing that the disruptions were due,
among other things, to the unavailability of certain plants that
we were required to maintain in operations. We have contested
the conclusions reached by the Energy Authority. In April 2004,
the Energy Authority initiated a formal inquiry to determine the
responsibilities of the parties involved in these events. In
light of the results of the preliminary investigations and in
order to gain certainty and limit the possible negative effects
on us, in September 2004, we decided to pay a fine of
€52,000 to settle
the potential claims against us, as permitted by Italian law. In
January 2005, the Energy Authority ended these proceedings, and
directed the Gestore della Rete not pay us approximately
€75 million
in sums due to us for the provision of reserve capacity in the
first half of 2003. We have challenged the Energy
Authority’s direction before the Administrative Tribunal of
Lombardy; a hearing date has not yet been set. While we believe
we will prevail in this challenge, there can be no assurance
that the tribunal will decide in our favor.
In addition, as of May 2005, three of our customers had
commenced legal proceedings against Enel Distribuzione or Enel
Produzione in Italian courts to seek refunds and damages for
relatively minor amounts for the disruption in service related
to the brown-out. To date, the courts have not issued any
decisions in these proceedings. Italian law does not provide for
the award of punitive damages in such cases, and plaintiffs will
be limited to compensatory damages, if any.
Alleged abuse of market power proceedings. Since 1997,
several suppliers of equipment to our distribution division have
brought civil actions against us claiming that we abused our
market power in the Italian electricity distribution sector by
imposing contractual terms and conditions on them. The
plaintiffs have sought increases in the compensation paid to
them under supply contracts with us. We are contesting the
suppliers’ claims. The first three decisions rendered in
these cases upheld our contention that civil courts lack
jurisdiction to hear these cases. In 1995, the Antitrust
Authority, prompted by similar claims filed by the same
suppliers, issued an opinion in which it held that our conduct
did not constitute an abuse of market power. Following the
withdrawal of the petitions filed by several suppliers, the
aggregate value of the claims currently pending against us is
€163 million.
In January 2004, an expert appointed by the Court of Bari, where
one of the proceedings was pending, confirmed the opinion issued
by the Antitrust Authority.
Alleged abuse of dominant position by Enel Energia. On
March 7, 2002, the Antitrust Authority began an
investigation to assess whether Enel, through one of its
subsidiaries, Enel Energia, abused its dominant position by,
among other things, including in its standard contract for the
sale of electricity to Eligible Customers in 2002 certain
exclusivity and priority clauses aimed at discouraging them from
changing their electricity supplier. On November 27, 2003,
the Antitrust Authority determined that this conduct constituted
a serious violation of the European Community Treaty and imposed
a fine of
€2.5 million.
Enel has appealed the Antitrust Authority’s ruling to the
Administrative Tribunal of Lazio, arguing that it did not hold a
dominant position in the market during the period at issue and
therefore it could not have abused a dominant position, as well
as that the conduct of Enel Energia cannot be attributed to
Enel. While awaiting a ruling on the appeal, Enel paid the
€2.5 million
fine within the required 90-day period.
Alleged abuse of dominant position by Enel and Enel
Produzione. On April 6, 2005, as a result of Energy
Authority investigations in June 2004 and January 2005 into
sharp increases in the price of electricity on the Italian power
exchange, the Antitrust Authority opened proceedings for alleged
abuse of dominant position against Enel and Enel Produzione. In
particular, the Antitrust Authority alleges that Enel used its
market power to fix prices, in order to either advantage or
disadvantage competitors, by taking advantage of differences in
prices among different zones of the market. These antitrust
proceedings are expected to be concluded by March 31, 2006.
150
Alleged abuse of dominant position by Viesgo
Generaciòn. On November 8, 2004, the Spanish
Antitrust Authority initiated proceedings against our subsidiary
Viesgo Generaciòn for abuse of dominant position for
alleged price fixing. We expect these proceedings to take
approximately one year. If the Spanish Authority were to hold
Viesgo Generaciòn liable for this alleged violation of
antitrust law, it could impose on Viesgo Generaciòn a fine
of up to 10% of its total revenues in the preceding year.
Alleged abuse of dominant position and/or cartel by Wind.
On March 1, 2005, the Antitrust Authority initiated
proceedings against our subsidiary Wind, as well as its
competitors Telecom Italia Mobile and Vodafone Omnitel, for an
alleged abuse of a dominant position and/or existence of a
cartel to restrict competition in the mobile telephony market,
following allegations of anticompetitive behavior by certain
suppliers of other telecommunication services. These suppliers
allege that Wind and the other two companies engaged in
anticompetitive behavior by: (i) preventing access to their
existing mobile networks by other operators;
(ii) discriminating the alternative operators in favor of
their own commercial divisions in so far as call termination
services are concerned; and (iii) adopting parallel
commercial behavior with respect to the supply of mobile
communications services for business customers. Wind is
currently waiting for hearing date to be set. The proceedings
are expected to be completed by the end of April 2006.
Orimulsion arbitration. Until December 31, 2003, we
had a contract to purchase specified quantities of orimulsion
from Bitumenes Orinoco S.A. (“Bitor”), a Venezuelan
company owned by Petroleos de Venezuela S.A.. At the end of
2003, we negotiated a renewal contract with Bitor that was
initialed by Bitor but never formally executed. In January 2004,
Bitor provided us with approximately 80,000 tons of orimulsion.
However, in February 2004, Bitor informed us that it would no
longer supply orimulsion to us as the Venezuelan Energy Ministry
had not approved the contract. Nonetheless, in March 2004, Bitor
sold us a similar amount of orimulsion in a spot transaction.
After seeking an amicable settlement of the dispute, on
March 17, 2005, we filed a request for arbitration with the
International Chamber of Commerce in Paris, seeking damages
provisionally quantified at $200 million, as well as
further damages, to be quantified subsequently, related to the
loss of investments we had made in connection with plans to
convert our Porto Tolle power plant to burn orimulsion. We are
currently waiting for the arbitral panel to be appointed.
Echelon arbitration. Enel Distribuzione is currently
involved in a dispute with Echelon Corp. concerning what we
consider to be Echelon’s violation of its obligation to
supply us worldwide with the same type of Telemanagement system
products that it currently supplies to us in Italy and its
obligation to support us in the marketing of these products. On
April 27, 2004, we filed a request for arbitration of this
dispute with the International Chamber of Commerce, seeking
damages amounting to approximately
€40 million
or, as an alternative remedy, an appropriate extension of the
duration of Echelon’s obligations. We are currently waiting
for the arbitral tribunal to issue its decision, which we expect
by the end of 2005.
Congestion fees litigation with the Energy Authority. In
November 2004, the Energy Authority issued a decision requiring
us to pay the Gestore della Rete congestion fees in an amount of
approximately
€31 million
in connection with our long-term electricity import contracts.
We have challenged this decision in the Administrative Court of
Lombardy. A hearing date has yet to be set.
Gas concessions. Two municipalities in the Lombardy
region have enacted measures setting the expiration of our gas
distribution concessions at December 31, 2005. We have
challenged these measures before the Administrative Tribunal of
Lombardy. In February 2005, the court ruled in favor of the
municipalities; we have appealed this ruling before the Council
of State, the highest competent appeals court. A hearing on the
matter has been scheduled for June 24, 2005. Please see
“Item 3. Key Information — Risk
Factors — Risks Relating to Our Energy
Business — We are dependent on government concessions
for our electricity and gas distribution businesses.”
Criminal proceedings involving certain former Enelpower
executives. In February 2003, the public prosecutor of Milan
initiated a criminal investigation of the former chief executive
officer of Enelpower, a former senior executive of Enelpower,
and 12 other persons for the alleged commission of certain
crimes, including embezzlement, fraud, corruption, and false
statements to shareholders, in connection with certain
transactions carried out by Enelpower in the Middle East and
Italy, including transaction with the Siemens and Alstom groups.
On March 5, 2003, Enelpower was notified of the pending
investigation and the possible administrative liability it may
incur in relation to the alleged crimes. On June 6, 2003,
the Court of Milan,
151
upon request by the public prosecutor, ordered the arrest of the
former chief executive officer and the former senior executive
of Enelpower on suspicion of such charges.
In response to this criminal proceeding, we and our subsidiary
Enelpower initiated legal actions against all Enelpower
employees involved in the alleged offenses, aimed at protecting
the interests of the Enel Group and those of Enel’s
shareholders. In addition, Enelpower notified its suppliers
involved in the investigation that, in the event the alleged
illegal conduct should be proven, Enelpower would seek
compensation for damages suffered as a result. On July 11,2003, the former chairman of Enel Produzione resigned after
voluntarily disclosing to the public prosecutor of Milan the
extent of his involvement in the alleged illegal conduct that is
the subject of the prosecutor’s investigation. We and Enel
Produzione intend to seek any damages caused to us by the
alleged illegal conduct, should such conduct be proved as a
result of the pending investigation. None of the individuals
charged to date are currently employed by us.
We submitted to the Court of Milan a copy of a settlement
agreement between us and Siemens S.p.A. under which we received
€20 million
from Siemens S.p.A. for damages to our reputation, as well as
the right to renegotiate existing agreements between Siemens
S.p.A. and Enel Produzione. In April 2004, the Court of Milan,
as a cautionary measure, banned Siemens AG from receiving
contracts from public entities in Italy related to the supply of
gas turbines because of its alleged illicit relationship with
members of management of Enelpower and the former chairman of
Enel Produzione. On February 19, 2004, we entered into a
settlement with Alstom Holdings S.A., Alstom Power Inc. and
Alstom Power Italia S.p.A. providing for damages to us for
injury to our reputation of
€2.5 million,
in cash, and of
€2 million,
in the form of credits applicable to future purchases by any
Enel Group company from any Alstom Group company. As a result of
these criminal proceedings, in December 2004, the Court of
Accounts issued a decree freezing the assets and the credits of
the former chief executive officer and a former manager of
Enelpower and the former chairman of Enel Produzione and
summoned them to appear in court to ascertain their alleged
responsibility with regards to economic loss for the government.
On February 18, 2005, this decree was confirmed by a court
order. We do not expect these proceedings to have an adverse
effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
Dividend Policy
Enel’s shareholders are entitled to receive interim or
annual dividends that the Company’s board recommends and,
in the case of annual dividends, that the Company’s
shareholders approve.
Dividends were declared and paid in Italian lire until
July 8, 2001. On July 9, 2001, the re-denomination of
the Company’s share capital into euros and a one-for-two
reverse stock split became effective, and since then dividends
have been declared and paid in euros. The following table shows
the amount in euros of the Company’s dividends per share
payable in respect of each of the fiscal years indicated, based
on the 12,126,150,379 ordinary shares outstanding in 2000, on
the 6,063,075,189 ordinary shares outstanding in 2001, 2002 and
2003 and the 6,103,521,864 ordinary shares outstanding in 2004.
Following the one-for-two reverse stock split effective as of
July 9, 2001, this dividend, paid in 2001, amounted to
€0.26 and $0.24.
(2)
The amount of the aggregate dividend for each of 2000, 2001,
2002, 2003 and 2004 was equal to approximately 72%, 52%, 109%,
87% and 156% of our consolidated net income for the relevant
year, respectively.
(3)
We have translated the historical dividend amounts into
U.S. dollars using the noon buying rate for euro in effect
on the respective payment dates, except for the dividend amount
for 2004, part of which has not yet been paid. For the 2004
dividend, we have used the noon buying rate on May 26,2005, of €1.00 =
1.2517. The noon buying rate for euro may differ from the rate
that may be used by the Depositary for the ADSs in order to
convert euro into U.S. dollars for purposes of making
payments to holders of ADSs.
152
On November 25, 2004, Enel paid an interim dividend of
€0.33 per
share, amounting in the aggregate to approximately
€2,014 million,
with this amount taking into account the capital gain realized
by Enel in connection with the Terna IPO, as well as the effect
of the return of capital from Terna in connection with a capital
reduction effected by Terna in April 2004 ahead of its IPO.
Please see “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and
Prospects — Liquidity and Capital
Resources — Cash Flow Analysis.”
At the annual meeting held on May 26, 2005, Enel’s
shareholders resolved to pay an aggregate dividend of
approximately
€4.2 billion,
or €0.69 per
ordinary share, in respect of the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2004, including the interim dividend paid in
November 2004. As a result, the balance of the dividend (equal
to €0.36 per
share) will be paid on June 23, 2005, to holders of record
as of the close of business on June 17, 2005. The amount of
this aggregate dividend would be equal to approximately 156% of
our consolidated net income for the year.
Enel expects to pay an additional dividend of approximately
€0.17 to
€0.20 per share
in the second half of 2005 as a result of the expected disposal
of a further stake in Terna. Please see “Item 4.
Information on the Company — Business —
Overview — Transmission” for a discussion of this
expected disposal.
Dividends payable on Enel’s ordinary shares to individuals
or entities not resident in Italy may be subject to deduction of
Italian withholding tax. Please see “Item 10.
Additional Information — Taxation —
Withholding Tax on Dividends.”
Italian law allows Enel to pay dividends only out of the
Company’s statutory retained earnings, plus the
distributable reserves and statutory net income for the current
year, net of the amount to be allocated to the legal reserve in
the subsequent year. Please see “Item 10. Additional
Information — By-Laws — Dividend
Rights.” Enel’s board will recommend the payment of
any future dividends in light of conditions then existing,
including:
•
our financial performance;
•
cash and capital requirements;
•
any restrictions in financing agreements; and
•
prevailing business conditions.
Enel pays dividends on ordinary shares represented by ADSs to
the Depositary. The Depositary converts the dividends into
U.S. dollars at the prevailing rate of exchange, net of
conversion expenses of the Depositary and any applicable Italian
withholding tax. The amount of dividends received by holders of
ADSs in U.S. dollars may be affected by fluctuations in
exchange rates. Please see “Item 3. Key
Information — Exchange Rates” and
“Item 3. Key Information — Risk
Factors — Risks Relating to Enel’s Ordinary
Shares and ADSs — The value, expressed in dollars, of
the ordinary shares and ADSs and of any dividends Enel pays in
respect of the Company’s ordinary shares and ADSs will be
affected by the euro/dollar exchange rate” for a more
detailed discussion of the risks of euro/dollar exchange rate
fluctuations for holders of ADSs.
Significant Changes
On May 26, 2005, we entered into an agreement for the sale
to Weather of a 62.75% interest in Wind, which we expect to take
place during the summer of 2005; the agreement also contemplates
our disposal of our remaining interest in Wind by mid-2006. The
agreement is subject to the approval of both the Antitrust
Authority and the Communications Authority. Upon completion of
these transactions, we will no longer have any direct interest
in Wind, but will hold an interest of approximately 26% in
Weather, which will then own all of Wind, as well as a
controlling stake in Orascom, an Egypt-based mobile phone
company with its main operations in the Middle East, Africa, and
Pakistan. For additional details regarding the agreement, see
“Item 4. Information on the Company —
Business — The Enel Group —
Telecommunications.”
On April 5, 2005, we sold 13.9% of Terna’s share
capital for gross proceeds of
€568 million
in a private placement not registered under the Securities Act
to institutional investors. We currently own 36.14% of Terna. In
May 2005, Enel agreed to sell a 29.99% stake in Terna to Cassa
Depositi e Prestiti for consideration that, depending on the
price of Terna’s shares on the Italian Stock Exchange in a
specified period prior to closing of the sale, will be between a
minimum of
€1,228 million
and a maximum of
€1,412 million.
We expect
153
closing of the transaction, which is subject to certain
conditions, to take place by the end of the third quarter of
2005. Please see “Item 4. Information on the
Company — Business — Overview —
Transmission.”
In February 2005, we agreed to purchase a 66% interest in SE,
the principal electric power generation company in Slovakia,
with a market share of more than 80%, for
€840 million.
We expect this transaction to close by the end of 2005. SE has
total installed generation capacity of approximately
6,900 MW, of which 38% is nuclear-powered, 35% is
hydroelectric-powered, and 27% is powered by conventional
thermal sources. Please see “Item 4. Information on
the Company — Business — The Enel
Group — Generation and Energy Management —
International Generation.” With this acquisition, we will
be re-entering the nuclear power generation business; we have
not owned any nuclear power plants since November 2000, and we
have not produced electricity from nuclear power plants since
1988. Please see “Item 4. Information on the
Company — Regulatory Matters — Environmental
Matters — Discontinued Nuclear Operations.”
ITEM 9.
THE OFFER AND LISTING
Markets and Price Range of ADSs and Ordinary Shares
The principal trading market for Enel’s ordinary shares is
the Telematico, the Italian automated screen-based trading
system managed by the Borsa Italiana. Enel’s shares are
traded on the Telematico under the symbol “ENEL.”
Enel’s American Depositary Shares, or ADSs (each
representing 5 ordinary shares), are listed on the New York
Stock Exchange, where they are traded under the symbol
“EN.” Citibank is Enel’s depositary for purposes
of issuing the American Depositary Receipts evidencing the ADSs.
Trading in Enel’s ordinary shares on the Telematico and in
Enel’s ADSs on the New York Stock Exchange commenced on
November 2, 1999.
The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the
reported high and low sales prices of the ADSs on the New York
Stock Exchange, adjusted to reflect the effect of a one-for-two
reverse stock split effective as of July 9, 2001.
ADSs
High
Low
(In dollars)
2000
46.00
35.05
2001
38.85
25.00
2002
30.31
22.60
2003
First Quarter
29.64
26.58
Second Quarter
35.85
28.58
Third Quarter
33.05
29.99
Fourth Quarter
34.15
30.50
2004
First Quarter
40.89
34.35
Second Quarter
41.98
38.47
Third Quarter
41.19
37.48
Fourth Quarter
49.44
40.00
December 2004-May 2005
December 2004
49.44
45.23
January 2005
48.88
46.23
February 2005
49.95
47.25
March 2005
49.20
46.80
April 2005
48.80
46.73
May 2005
48.29
45.20
154
The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the
reported high and low “official” sales prices for the
ordinary shares on Telematico, adjusted to reflect the
one-for-two reverse stock split effective as of July 9,2001.
Ordinary Shares
High
Low
(In euros)
2000
9.357
7.348
2001
8.051
5.650
2002
6.765
4.490
2003
First Quarter
5.471
5.015
Second Quarter
6.022
5.227
Third Quarter
5.740
5.340
Fourth Quarter
5.479
5.218
2004
First Quarter
6.581
5.464
Second Quarter
6.920
6.454
Third Quarter
6.651
6.143
Fourth Quarter
7.245
6.570
December 2004-May 2005
December 2004
7.245
6.731
January 2005
7.240
7.085
February 2005
7.698
7.142
March 2005
7.450
7.112
April 2005
7.522
7.285
May 2005
7.430
7.141
Enel’s ordinary shares are among the constituents of the
MIB 30 Index, the primary Italian stock market index.
As of May 13, 2005, 6,124,838,588 ordinary shares were
outstanding. On May 31, 2005, the closing price of
Enel’s ordinary shares on Telematico was
€7.401 and the
closing price of the ADSs on the New York Stock Exchange was
$47.65.
In September 2004, Enel’s stock was added to the DJSI (Dow
Jones Sustainability Index) World, a global index tracking the
financial performance of selected
“sustainability-driven” companies worldwide.
ITEM 10.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Stock Option Plans
Enel’s board of directors has approved stock option
incentive plans that have been made available to an aggregate of
approximately 800 Group executives, as identified from time to
time by the board of directors at the time of the grant.
Currently, the stock option plans approved by Enel’s board
of directors in 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004 and 2005 are still in
force, while the stock option plan approved in 2000 has expired.
The terms of the various stock option plans generally include
the following:
•
if vested, the options are normally exercisable starting one
year after they are granted and for a period of five years
thereafter, except under the 2001 plan where the options are
exercisable for a period of four years; however, during the
first three or four years (depending on the plan) during which
exercise is permitted, exercise is limited to annual tranches
(varying from 15% to 40%), although under the
155
2001 plan, 20% of the options granted in any given year are
exercisable after one year and the remaining 80% after three
years;
•
under the 2001 plan, the options may be exercised only within
the fifteen trading days following the shareholders’
approval of the financial statements for the preceding fiscal
year; under the 2002 plan, and 2003 plan, each year, options may
be exercised only within the fifteen trading days following each
of (i) the board of directors’ approval of preliminary
financial data for the preceding fiscal year on a consolidated
basis, (ii) the shareholders’ approval of the
financial statements for the preceding fiscal year, and
(iii) the board of directors’ approval of the report
relating to the quarter ending September 30; under the 2004
and 2005 plans the options are exercisable at any time other
than during the period (i) beginning on the date that is
one month prior to the day scheduled for the approval of
Enel’s annual financial statements by its board of
directors and ending on the date of such approval and
(ii) beginning on the date that is one month prior to the
day scheduled for the approval of Enel’s six-month report
by its board of directors and ending on the date of such
approval;
•
under the 2001 plan, options vest if the average reference price
of Enel’s shares on Telematico over the last three months
of the year of the grant is higher than a target price
determined by the board of directors at the time of the grant.
The board sets the target price with reference to securities
analysts’ estimates of the future price of Enel’s
shares. If the target price is not met in a given year, all of
the one-year options and 30% of the three-year options granted
in that year do not vest and expire. However, the remaining 70%
of the three-year options granted in the year (56% of the
options allotted as a whole) may still vest if (i) the
price of Enel’s shares on Telematico during the year of the
grant outperforms a specified reference index over the same
period and (ii) the actual growth in value of our business
during the year of the grant (as determined using a proprietary
formula) exceeds the expected growth for that year, as
determined by the board of directors at the time of the grant.
If these conditions are not met, the remaining 70% of three-year
options may also vest if the average reference price of
Enel’s shares on Telematico over the last three months of
the second year following the grant is higher than the target
price for the year of the grant, as adjusted for the expected
variation of the price of Enel’s shares in the following
two years, as determined by the board of directors each year.
Under the other plans currently in place, options vest if both
the Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and
Amortization, or EBITDA, of the Group for the relevant fiscal
year exceeds the estimated EBITDA as indicated in the budget
approved by the board of directors for the relevant year, and
the price of Enel’s shares on Telematico outperforms a
specified reference index over the same period. If any of these
conditions is not met, all the options expire;
•
The strike price of the options is set by the board of directors
on the date of the grant and cannot be lower than the average
reference price of Enel’s shares on Telematico during the
month preceding the grant;
•
The number of options granted under the 2001, 2002 and 2003
plans to participating managers was determined pursuant to a
formula based on the participant’s gross salary for the
year in question and the value of an option exercisable in the
third year following its grant, calculated according to market
value indications supplied by primary financial institutions.
Under the 2004 and 2005 plans, options are granted using a new
method based on proportional criteria; and
•
Options are not transferable inter vivos.
From 2001 through 2005, Enel’s board of directors
determined that the conditions to vesting for (i) 70% of
the options granted under the 2001 plan and exercisable starting
three years after their grant, and (ii) all of the options
granted under the 2002, 2003, and 2004 plans, were satisfied
during the reference period. Such outstanding options could
therefore be exercised in the periods set forth in the relevant
stock option plan.
156
The following table lists each of our stock option plans by
date, number of grantees, total options granted, options
exercised as of May 13, 2005, strike price and scheduled
expiration date:
Including Enel’s former chief executive officer,
Mr. Tatò, in his capacity as general manager
(direttore generale), as well as Enel’s current
chief executive officer, Mr. Conti, in his capacity as
chief financial officer.
(2)
The number of options and the corresponding number of ordinary
shares, which originally amounted to an aggregate of 68,548,100,
decreased to 34,274,050 as a result of the one-for-two reverse
stock split effective as of July 9, 2001.
(3)
After June 16, 2005, the options granted under the 2001
plan will no longer be exercisable.
(4)
The strike price of options granted in 2001, originally fixed at
€3.636 per
share, was set at
€7.272 as a
result of the one-for-two reverse stock split.
(5)
Including Enel’s former chief executive officers,
Mr. Tatò and Mr. Scaroni, each in his capacity as
general managers (direttori generali), as well as
Enel’s current chief executive officer, Mr. Conti, in
his capacity as chief financial officer.
(6)
The strike price for the options granted to Enel’s former
chief executive officer, Mr. Scaroni, was determined with
regard to the reference price of Enel’s shares on
Telematico on the date of his appointment as general manager
(direttore generale), and was therefore set at
€6.480.
(7)
Including Enel’s former chief executive officer,
Mr. Scaroni, in his capacity as general manager
(direttore generale) as well as Enel’s current chief
executive officer, Mr. Conti, in his capacity as chief
financial officer.
(8)
The conditions for the vesting of options under the 2005 plan
have not yet been formally satisfied.
In connection with the stock option plans approved by
Enel’s board of directors, Enel’s shareholders have
resolved to authorize the board of directors to increase
Enel’s share capital by a certain maximum amount, as a
result:
(i) under the December 1999 authorization (having already
taken into account the one-for-two reverse stock split effective
July 9, 2001), on April 9, 2001, Enel’s board of
directors resolved to increase the Company’s share capital
by an amount not to exceed
€34,274,050
through the issuance (in one or more tranches over a five-year
period) of a maximum of 34,274,050 new ordinary shares reserved
for issuance upon the exercise of options granted under the 2001
plan, to be subscribed by December 31, 2005; as of
May 13, 2005, no ordinary shares had been issued in
connection with the exercise of 2001 options;
(ii) under the May 2001 authorization, on April 10,2003, Enel’s board of directors resolved to increase the
Company’s share capital by an amount not to exceed
€41,748,500
through the issuance (in one or more tranches over a five-year
period) of a maximum of 41,748,500 new ordinary shares reserved
for issuance upon the exercise of options granted under the 2002
plan to be subscribed by December 31, 2007; as of
May 13, 2005, 33,756,350 ordinary shares had been issued in
connection with the exercise of an equivalent number of options;
(iii) under the May 2003 authorization, on April 7,2004 Enel’s board of directors resolved to increase the
Company’s share capital by an amount not to exceed
€47,624,005
through the issuance (in one or more tranches over a five-year
period) of a maximum of 47,624,005 new ordinary shares, reserved
for issuance upon the exercise of options granted under the 2003
plan to be subscribed by December 31,
157
2008; as of May 13, 2005, 27,152,567 ordinary shares had
been issued in connection with the exercise of an equivalent
number of options;
(iv) under the May 2004 authorization, on March 30,2005 Enel’s board of directors resolved to increase the
Company’s share capital by an amount not to exceed
€38,527,550
through the issuance (in one or more tranches over a five-year
period) of a maximum of 38,527,550 new ordinary shares, reserved
for issuance upon the exercise of options granted under the 2004
plan to be subscribed by December 31, 2009; as of
May 13, 2005, 854,482 ordinary shares had been issued in
connection with the exercise of an equivalent number of options.
At the annual meeting held on May 26, 2005, Enel’s
shareholders authorized the board of directors, for a period of
five years, to increase Enel’s share capital by a maximum
total amount of
€28,757,000 in
order to permit the issuance (in one or more tranches) of a
maximum of 28,757,000 new ordinary shares under the terms of the
2005 stock option plan. This authorization, together with those
granted in previous years and not yet utilized or expired, would
entail a maximum potential dilution of Enel’s share capital
amounting to approximately 2.79%.
In March 2004, the board of directors resolved to grant,
beginning in 2004, a special bonus to those beneficiaries of our
various stock-option plans who exercise their options, in an
amount to be determined by the board of directors each time it
adopts resolutions concerning the allocation of earnings. The
amount of the bonuses is based on the portion of the
“divestiture dividends” (as defined below) distributed
after the date the options were granted.
The premise on which this initiative is based is that the
portion of dividends attributable to capital gains deriving from
the divestiture of property and/or financial assets (so-called
“divestiture dividends”) be considered as a return to
shareholders of a portion of the Company’s value, which, as
such, has the potential to affect the price of the
Company’s shares. This bonus is intended to benefit the
beneficiaries of the stock-option plans who — because
of choices they have made or restrictions imposed under the
terms of our stock option plans — exercise their
options after the ex-dividend date for any “divestiture
dividends.” These bonus are paid only with respect to the
portion of any dividend that constitutes a “divestiture
dividend,” and not with respect to any portion of a
dividend relating to ordinary business activities or
reimbursements arising from regulatory measures.
Starting in 2004, when beneficiaries of our stock-option plans
exercise their options, they are entitled to receive a bonus
amount related to any “divestiture dividends”
distributed by Enel after the date the options were granted, but
prior to their exercise. The bonus in question will be paid by
the company of the Enel Group that employs the beneficiary, and
is subject to ordinary taxation as employee income.
To date, Enel’s board of directors has approved: (i) a
bonus amounting to
€0.08 per
option exercised after the ex-dividend date of June 21,2004, with respect to the
€0.36 per
share dividend related to our results in 2003; (ii) a bonus
amounting to
€0.33 per
option exercised after the ex-dividend date of November 22,2004, with respect to the 2004 interim dividend of the same
amount per share; and (iii) a bonus amounting to
€0.02 per
option exercised after the ex-dividend date of June 20,2005, with respect to the balance of the 2004 dividend of
€0.36 per
share.
The following is a summary of certain information concerning
Enel’s shares and by-laws (Statuto) and of Italian
law applicable to Italian companies whose shares are listed in a
regulated market in the European Union, as in effect at the date
of this annual report. The summary contains all the information
that we consider to be material regarding Enel’s shares but
does not purport to be complete, and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to the by-laws or Italian law, as the case
may be.
Italian companies whose shares are listed on a regulated market
of the European Union are principally governed by two sets of
rules — the Italian civil code (applicable to all
Italian companies), and the Unified Financial Act of
February 24, 1998, as amended, (Testo Unico
dell’Intermediazione Finanziaria, or TUF) and the
related implementing regulations applicable to listed companies.
In January 2003, the Italian government approved a wide-ranging
reform of the corporate law provisions of the Italian civil
code, which took effect on
158
January 1, 2004. In February 2004, the Italian government
amended the TUF to coordinate it with the new corporate law
provisions of the Italian civil code. The amendments to the
Italian civil code and to the TUF constitute the so-called 2004
corporate law reform. On May 21, 2004 Enel’s
shareholders approved a number of amendments to Enel’s
by-laws dictated or made possible by the 2004 corporate law
reform. The following summary takes into account the 2004
corporate law reform and the consequent amendments to
Enel’s by-laws.
General
In May 2001, the Company’s shareholders approved the
re-denomination of the Company’s share capital into euro
from lire and a one-for-two reverse stock split, effective
July 9, 2001. As a result, at that date, the issued and
outstanding share capital of the Company consisted of
6,063,075,189 ordinary shares, each with a par value of
€1. Before that
date, the Company’s share capital consisted of
12,126,150,379 ordinary shares, each with a par value of Lit.
1,000. In accordance with Italian law, in connection with the
re-denomination, Enel’s share capital was rounded down by
approximately Lit. 386 million
(€199,352), which
the Company allocated to a special statutory reserve.
As of May 13, 2005, all of the Company’s 6,124,838,588
issued and outstanding ordinary shares are fully paid,
non-assessable and in registered form.
Enel’s registered office is in Rome, Italy, at Viale Regina
Margherita No. 137, and the Company is registered with the
Italian Companies’ Register held by the Chamber of Commerce
of Rome at No. 00811720580. As set forth in Article 4
of Enel’s by-laws, its corporate purpose is to acquire and
manage equity holdings in Italian and foreign companies, and to
provide such companies with strategic guidelines regarding their
industrial organization and business activities. Enel’s
by-laws identify the following as Enel’s principal
activities, which it may carry out through its affiliates or
subsidiaries: (i) the electricity industry, including the
activities of production, importation and exportation,
distribution and sale, as well as transmission within the limits
of existing legislation; (ii) the energy industry in
general, including the fuel sector, the field of environmental
protection and the water sector; (iii) the communications,
telematics and information-technology industries and those of
multimedia and interactive services; and (iv) the
network-based utility services sector (electricity, water, gas,
district heating, telecommunications) and local metropolitan
utility services. Enel is generally authorized to take any
actions necessary or useful to achieve the Company’s
corporate purpose.
Authorization of Shares
At the annual meeting held on May 26, 2005, Enel’s
shareholders authorized the board of directors, for a period of
five years, to increase Enel’s share capital by a maximum
total amount of
€28,757,000 in
order to permit the issuance (in one or more tranches) of a
maximum of 28,757,000 new ordinary shares under the terms of the
2005 stock option plan. This authorization, together with those
granted in previous years and not yet utilized or expired, would
entail a maximum potential dilution of Enel’s share capital
amounting to approximately 2.79%.
Under the authorization granted to Enel’s board of
directors on May 21, 2004, Enel’s board of directors
on March 30, 2005, resolved to increase the Company’s
share capital by a maximum total amount of
€38,527,550 in
order to permit the issuance of a maximum of 38,527,550 new
ordinary shares in connection with the 2004 stock option plan.
Of these shares, as of May 13, 2005, 854,482 have already
been issued as result of the exercises of options under the
plan. See also “— Stock Option Plans.”
Form and Transfer of Shares
Pursuant to the TUF, Legislative Decree No. 213 of
June 24, 1998 (“Decree No. 213”) and CONSOB
Regulation No. 11768 of December 23, 1998
(“Regulation No. 11768”), as amended, since
January 1, 1999, shareholders can no longer obtain the
physical delivery of share certificates representing shares of
Italian listed companies. Shares of Italian listed companies are
no longer represented by paper certificates and the transfer and
exchange of shares takes place exclusively through an electronic
book-entry system. All shares must,
159
accordingly, be deposited by their owners with an intermediary
(each an “Intermediary”), which is defined by
Regulation No. 11768 as:
•
an Italian or EU bank;
•
a non-EU bank authorized by the Bank of Italy to operate in the
Italian market;
•
Società di Intermediazione Mobiliare, or SIM;
•
an EU investment company;
•
a non-EU investment company authorized by CONSOB to provide
investment services in Italy;
the controlling shareholder of the company which has issued the
shares;
•
the Bank of Italy;
•
an EU or non-EU entity operating a centralized clearing system;
•
a financial intermediary operating a clearing system governed by
art. 69 (2) and 70 of the TUF;
•
a financial intermediary registered on the list kept by the Bank
of Italy under art. 107 of Legislative Decree No. 385 of
September 1, 1993;
•
Poste Italiane S.p.A. (the Italian Post Office company);
•
Cassa Depositi e Prestiti;
•
the MEF; and
•
the managers of foreign clearing, settlement and guarantee
systems for financial instruments, provided that they are
subject to supervision equivalent to that provided by Italian
law.
The Intermediary in turn deposits the shares with Monte Titoli
S.p.A. (“Monte Titoli”) or with another company
authorized by CONSOB to operate a centralized clearing system.
To transfer shares under the system introduced by Decree
No. 213, owners of shares are required to give instructions
to their Intermediaries. If the transferee is a client of the
transferor’s Intermediary, the Intermediary simply
transfers the shares from the transferor’s account to the
account of the transferee. If, however, the transferee is a
client of another Intermediary, the transferor’s
Intermediary instructs the company operating a centralized
clearing system to transfer the shares to the account of the
transferee’s Intermediary, which will then record the
shares in the transferee’s account.
Each Intermediary maintains a custody account for each of its
clients setting out the financial instruments of such client and
keeps a record of all transfers, payment of dividends, exercise
of rights attributable to such instruments, charges or other
encumbrances on the instruments. The account holder or any other
eligible party (for example, in the case of a pledge over the
financial instrument, the pledge holder) may submit a request to
the Intermediary for the issue of a certified statement of
account. The request must indicate the quantity of the financial
instruments in respect of which the statement is requested, the
rights which the applicant intends to exercise and the duration
in respect of which the certificate’s validity is required.
Within three business days from the receipt of such request, the
Intermediary shall issue a certified statement of account that
constitutes evidence of the account holder’s ownership of
the financial instruments indicated. Once a certificate has been
issued, the Intermediary may not effect any transfer of the
corresponding securities until the certificate expires or is
returned.
The shares have been accepted for clearance through Euroclear
and Clearstream. Purchasers of shares may elect to hold such
shares through Euroclear or Clearstream. Persons owning a
beneficial interest in shares held through Monte Titoli,
Euroclear and Clearstream must rely on the procedures of Monte
Titoli, Euroclear and Clearstream, respectively, and of the
Intermediaries that have accounts with Monte Titoli, Euroclear
and Clearstream, to exercise their rights as holders of shares.
160
Limitations on shareholdings
According to Italian privatization law, Enel’s by-laws
provide that no shareholder other than the Italian government,
public statutory bodies and the relevant subsidiaries may own
ordinary shares representing more than 3% of the Company’s
voting share capital. This limit does not apply in the event
that it is exceeded as a result of certain types of tender
offers as provided under Italian law.
The limitation on shareholding is calculated taking into
account, among other things, shares owned by:
•
Controlling entities and directly or indirectly controlled
entities of the holder, as well as entities controlled by the
same controlling entity; and
•
Affiliated personal entities of the holder, including spouses
and other closely related personal relatives.
Italian privatization law and Enel’s by-laws restrict the
ability of any entity to exercise any voting rights attributable
to ordinary shares held or controlled by that entity
representing more than 3% of Enel’s voting share capital.
This restriction does not apply to any shareholdings held by the
Italian state, other state-owned entities or other entities
controlled by the state or other state-owned entities. The
voting rights of each entity to whom this limit on shareholding
applies are reduced correspondingly. In the event that ordinary
shares held or controlled in excess of the 3% threshold are
voted, any shareholders’ resolution adopted pursuant to
this vote may be challenged if the majority required to approve
this resolution would not have been reached without the vote of
ordinary shares held exceeding this threshold. Ordinary shares
not entitled to be voted are nevertheless counted for purposes
of determining the quorum at a shareholders’ meeting.
Further limitations on shareholdings result from the special
powers of the MEF.
Special powers of the MEF
The Italian privatization law and the Company’s by-laws
confer upon the Italian government, acting through the MEF,
certain special powers with respect to our business and actions
by Enel’s shareholders. These powers may apply regardless
of the MEF’s shareholding in Enel. In September 2004, the
government substantially confirmed the scope and duration of the
MEF’s special powers, taking into account, among other
factors, the liberalization level achieved by that time in the
European energy sector. The MEF exercises these special powers
after consultation with, and with the agreement of, the Ministry
of Productive Activities. The Italian budget law for 2004 (Law
No. 350 of December 24, 2003) amended the regulations
concerning the “special powers” held by the
government. Enel’s by-laws now reflect the following
special powers of the MEF:
Opposition to material acquisitions of shares
The MEF has the authority to oppose the acquisition by persons
or entities of an interest in the Company equal to or in excess
of 3% of the share capital (including ordinary shares held in
the form of American Depositary Shares) with voting rights at
ordinary shareholders’ meetings in the event the Minister
considers the transaction to be detrimental to vital national
interests. The MEF must express any opposition to an acquisition
by such a person or entity within ten days of receiving notice
from the board of directors that a request to register such an
interest in the shareholders’ register has been made.
During this ten-day period, all non-economic rights, including
the right to vote, pertaining to the shares to be acquired are
suspended. Should the MEF oppose a purchase for due cause in an
order setting out the concrete detriment the transaction would
cause to vital national interests, the purchaser may not
exercise the right to vote nor any other non-economic right
pertaining to the excess shares held, and must dispose of such
shares within one year. In case of failure to comply, upon
request by the MEF, a court will order the sale of the subject
shares. The purchaser has 60 days to challenge an order
opposing its purchase before the Administrative Tribunal of
Lazio.
Opposition to material shareholders’ agreements
The MEF has the authority to oppose certain types of
shareholders agreements (please see
“— Notification of the Acquisition of Shares and
Voting Rights”) entered into by holders of at least
one-twentieth of the voting capital stock at ordinary
shareholders meetings, if it believes such an agreement would be
detrimental to vital national interests. Parties to these types
of agreement are required to notify CONSOB upon entry into such
an agreement, and CONSOB in turn notifies the MEF. The MEF must
oppose the agreement within 10 days of receiving this
notice from CONSOB. During this ten-day period, all non-economic
rights pertaining
161
to the shares held by the parties to the agreement, including
the right to vote, are suspended. Should the MEF oppose an
agreement, for due cause in an order setting out the concrete
detriment the agreement would cause to vital national interests,
the agreement is not effective, and if it appears from their
conduct at a shareholders’ meeting that the parties to the
agreement are continuing to observe the arrangement contemplated
by the agreement, any resolution adopted with the decisive vote
of these shareholders may be challenged in court. Any party to
an agreement that the MEF opposes has 60 days to challenge
the MEF’s order before the Administrative Tribunal of Lazio.
Members of Enel’s Board of Directors
The MEF has the power to appoint one non-voting member of
Enel’s board of directors in addition to the voting members
elected by the shareholders.
Veto power over material changes
The MEF, for due cause when it believes concrete detriment to
vital national interests would result, may veto any resolution
to dissolve, merge or demerge Enel, to transfer a significant
part of its business or its registered headquarters outside of
Italy, to change its corporate purpose or to eliminate or modify
any of the MEF’s special powers. Any such veto may be
challenged within 60 days by any dissenting shareholder
before the Administrative Tribunal of Lazio.
The special powers of the MEF reflected in Enel’s by-laws
are also reflected in the by-laws of Enel Produzione, Terna and
Enel Distribuzione.
Dividend Rights
The payment by Enel of any annual dividend is proposed by the
board of directors and is subject to the approval of the
shareholders at the annual shareholders’ meeting. Before
dividends may be paid out of Enel’s net income in any year,
an amount equal to 5% of such net income must be allocated to
Enel’s legal reserve until such reserve is at least equal
to one-fifth of the par value of Enel’s issued share
capital. As of December 31, 2004, the amount of Enel’s
legal reserve exceeded one-fifth of the par value of its issued
share capital. If Enel’s capital is reduced as a result of
accumulated losses, dividends may not be paid until the capital
is reconstituted or reduced by the amount of such losses. The
board of directors may authorize the distribution of interim
dividends, subject to certain statutory limitations.
Dividends are payable to those persons who hold shares through
an Intermediary on the day preceding the ex-dividend payment
date declared by the shareholders’ meeting. Dividends not
collected within five years from the dividend payment date are
forfeited to the benefit of the Company. Payments in respect of
dividends are distributed through Monte Titoli on behalf of each
shareholder by the Intermediary with which the shareholder has
deposited its shares. Holders of ADSs are entitled to receive
payments in respect of dividends on the underlying shares
through the Depositary, in accordance with Enel’s deposit
agreement with Citibank relating to the ADRs (the “Deposit
Agreement”). Please see “Item 8. Financial
Information — Other Financial Information —
Dividend Policy.”
Voting Rights
Shareholders are entitled to one vote per share, although a
slate voting system applies in case of appointment of members of
the board of directors and of the board of statutory auditors.
Please see “— Minority Shareholders’
Rights.”
Proxy solicitation may be carried out by certain professional
investment and financial intermediaries, as well as certain
companies whose sole purpose is to carry out proxy solicitation,
on behalf of a qualified soliciting shareholder (generally, one
or more shareholders who have owned at least 0.5% of Enel’s
shares for more than six months and who have been so registered
with Enel for the same period of time).
Proxies may be collected by a shareholders’ association
provided that such association has been formed by notarized
private agreement, does not carry out business activities and is
made up of at least 50 individuals, each of whom owns not more
than 0.1% of Enel’s voting capital. Members of the
shareholders’ association may, but are not obliged to,
grant proxies to the legal representative of the association,
and proxies may also be
162
granted in respect of only certain of the matters to be
discussed at the relevant shareholders’ meeting. The
association may vote in different manners in compliance with the
instructions expressed by each member who has granted a proxy to
the association.
As a registered shareholder and ADR depositary, Citibank or its
nominee is entitled to vote the shares underlying the ADSs. The
Deposit Agreement requires Citibank (or its nominee) to accept
voting instructions from owners of ADSs and to execute such
instructions to the extent permitted by law.
Board of Directors
Pursuant to Enel’s by-laws, Enel’s board of directors
must consist of no fewer than three and no more than nine
members. In addition, a non-voting director may be appointed by
the MEF according to its special powers. The board of directors
is elected at a shareholders’ meeting for a term of up to
three years. Directors are eligible for re-election. For
additional information on the election of directors, please see
“— Minority Shareholders’ Rights.”
In accordance with Enel’s by-laws, management of the
Company is the exclusive responsibility of the directors, who
carry out all actions necessary to achieve the corporate purpose.
In addition to exercising the powers entrusted to it by law,
Enel’s by-laws provide the board of directors with the
power to adopt resolutions concerning:
•
mergers and demergers as permitted by law;
•
the establishment or elimination of secondary headquarters;
•
which directors shall have power to represent the Company;
•
the reduction of share capital in the event of the withdrawal of
one or more shareholder;
•
the harmonization of the by-laws with provisions of the
law; and
•
the transfer of the Company’s registered office within
Italy.
The chairman and chief executive officer are Enel’s legal
representatives. If a non voting director is appointed by the
MEF, he or she may not serve as chairman or as chief executive
officer. The chief executive officer generally has the power to
represent the Company within the scope of the functions
delegated to him. For specific actions or categories of actions,
the power to represent Enel can be delegated by the holder of
such power to one of Enel’s employees or to third parties.
The quorum for board meetings is a majority of the members in
office having the right to vote. Resolutions are adopted by a
majority of votes of those present. A board meeting may be
called by the chairman on his or her own initiative and must be
called upon a request by the board of statutory auditors (or at
least two of its members) or upon a request for a meeting for
specific purposes by at least two directors (or one director
when the board is composed of three members).
The board has the power to delegate certain of its powers to one
of its voting members, and determines the powers and the
functions delegated to such person. In accordance with Italian
law and Enel’s by-laws, the board of directors may not
delegate certain of its responsibilities, including those
relating to the approval of the draft financial statements, the
approval of merger and de-merger plans to be presented to
shareholders’ meetings, increases in the amount of
Enel’s share capital or the issuance of convertible
debentures (if any such power has been delegated to the board of
directors by vote of the extraordinary shareholders’
meeting) and the calling of an ordinary or an extraordinary
shareholders’ meeting to resolve upon the actions to be
taken by Enel in case of decrease of Enel’s
shareholders’ equity to less than two-thirds of Enel’s
paid-in capital as a result of accumulated losses. See also
“— Meetings of Shareholders.”
Under Italian law, directors having any interest in a proposed
transaction must disclose their interest to the board, even if
such interest is not in conflict with the interest of the
company in the same transaction. The interested director is not
required to abstain from voting on the resolution approving the
transaction, but the resolution must state explicitly the
reasons for, and the benefit to the company of, the approved
transaction. In the event that these provisions are not complied
with, or that the transaction would not have been approved
without the vote of the interested director, the resolution may
be challenged by a director or by the board of
163
statutory auditors if the approved transaction may be
prejudicial to the company. A chief executive officer having any
such interest in a proposed transaction within the scope of his
or her powers must solicit prior board approval of such
transaction. An interested director may be held liable for
damages to his company resulting from a resolution adopted in
breach of the above rules. Finally, directors may be held liable
for damages to their company if they illicitly profit from
insider information or corporate opportunities.
Under Italian law, directors may be removed from office at any
time by the vote of shareholders at an ordinary
shareholders’ meeting, although if directors are removed in
circumstances where there was no just cause, such directors may
have a claim for indemnification against the company. Directors
may resign at any time by written notice to the board of
directors and to the chairman of the board of statutory
auditors. The board of directors must appoint substitute
directors to fill vacancies arising from removals or
resignations, subject to the approval of the board of statutory
auditors, to serve until the next shareholders’ meeting,
except for any non-voting director appointed by the MEF, whose
vacancy must be filled in by a substitute non-voting director
also appointed by the MEF (please see “— Special
powers of the MEF — Members of Enel’s Board of
Directors”). The MEF has not to date appointed a non-voting
member to Enel’s board. If at any time more than half of
the members of the board of directors appointed at a
shareholders’ meeting resigns or otherwise ceases to be
directors, the entire board of directors will be considered to
have lapsed and the remaining members of the board of directors
(or the board of statutory auditors if all the members of the
board of directors have resigned or ceased to be directors) must
promptly call an ordinary shareholders’ meeting to appoint
a new board of directors.
The compensation of directors is determined by shareholders at
ordinary shareholders’ meetings. The board of directors
determines, upon the proposal of the board compensation
committee and after having consulted the board of statutory
auditors, the compensation of the chief executive officer and
the other directors holding specific offices. Directors are
entitled to reimbursement for expenses reasonably incurred in
connection with their functions.
Statutory Auditors
In addition to electing the board of directors, the
company’s shareholders elect a board of statutory auditors
(Collegio Sindacale) at ordinary shareholders’
meetings. The statutory auditors are elected for a term of three
fiscal years, may be re-elected for successive terms and may be
removed only for cause and with the approval of a competent
court.
Pursuant to certain provisions of the TUF, the by-laws of listed
companies must:
•
specify the number of statutory auditors (not fewer than three)
and alternate members (not fewer than two);
•
regulate the appointment of the chairman of the board of
statutory auditors;
•
limit the number of mandates that the statutory auditors may
have in other companies; and
•
include clauses ensuring that minority shareholders may elect
one statutory auditor (or at least two if the board is composed
of more than three members).
Enel’s by-laws currently provide that the board of
statutory auditors shall consist of three statutory auditors and
two alternate members (who are automatically substituted for a
statutory auditor who resigns or is otherwise unable to serve).
Enel’s by-laws also provide that the statutory auditors may
not hold the position of statutory auditor in five or more other
listed companies (not counting our subsidiaries). As to the
election of statutory auditors, please see
“— Minority Shareholders Rights.”
The TUF provides further that the board of statutory auditors
will be required to verify that the company (i) complies
with applicable law and its by-laws, (ii) respects the
principles of correct administration, (iii) maintains
adequate organizational structure, internal controls and
administrative and accounting systems, and (iv) adequately
instructs its subsidiaries to transmit to it information
relevant to the its disclosure obligations.
Each member of the board of statutory auditors must provide
certain evidence that he or she is in good standing and meets
certain professional standards.
164
Enel’s board of statutory auditors is required to meet at
least once every 90 days. In addition, the statutory
auditors of the Company must be present at meetings of the
company’s board of directors and shareholders’
meetings and at meetings of the Company’s executive
committee, if any. The statutory auditors may decide to call a
meeting of the shareholders, the board of directors or the
executive committee, ask the directors for information on the
management of the Company, carry out inspections and
verifications at the Company and exchange information with the
Company’s external auditors. The board of directors must
report to the statutory auditors at least quarterly on its
activities and on the main transactions carried out by the
Company and its subsidiaries.
Enel’s board of statutory auditors may convene a
shareholders’ meeting if it detects serious irregularities
during its review activities and there is an urgent need to take
action. Any shareholder may submit a complaint to the board of
statutory auditors regarding facts that such shareholder
believes should be subject to scrutiny by the board of statutory
auditors, which must take any complaint into account in its
report to the shareholders’ meeting. If shareholders
collectively representing 2% of the Company’s share capital
submit such a complaint, the board of statutory auditors must
promptly undertake an investigation and present its findings and
any recommendations to a shareholders’ meeting (which it
shall convene if the complaint concerns serious irregularities
and there is an urgent need to take action). The board of
statutory auditors may report to the competent court serious
breaches of the duties of the directors which may be prejudicial
to the Company or to its subsidiaries. The Company’s board
of statutory auditors is also required to notify CONSOB without
delay of any irregularities found during its review activities.
CONSOB may report to the competent court serious breaches of the
duties of the statutory auditors of a listed company.
External Auditors
The TUF requires Italian companies whose shares are listed on
regulated markets of EU member states to appoint a firm of
external auditors that shall verify (i) during the fiscal
year, that the company’s accounting records are correctly
kept and accurately reflect the company’s activities, and
(ii) that the financial statements correspond to the
accounting records and the verifications conducted by the
external auditors and comply with applicable rules. The external
auditors express their opinion on the financial statements in a
report that may be consulted by the shareholders prior to the
annual shareholders’ meeting.
The external auditors are appointed by a resolution taken at the
annual shareholders’ meeting for a three year term (which
may not be renewed more than twice). Such appointment must be
notified to CONSOB.
In May 2002, KPMG S.p.A., with registered offices at Via Vittor
Pisani 25, Milan, was appointed as Enel’s external
auditor for a three-year period. At the annual meeting held on
May 26, 2005, Enel’s shareholders reappointed KPMG
S.p.A. as Enel’s external auditor for a further three-year
period.
Meetings of Shareholders
Shareholders are entitled to attend and vote at ordinary and
extraordinary shareholders’ meetings. Votes may be cast
personally or by proxy. Shareholders’ meetings may be
called by Enel’s board of directors (or the board of
statutory auditors) and must be called if requested by holders
of at least 10% of the issued shares. Shareholders are not
entitled to request that a meeting of shareholders be convened
to resolve upon matters which by law are to be resolved upon on
the basis of a proposal, plan or report by Enel’s board of
directors. If a shareholders’ meeting is not called when
requested by shareholders and such refusal is unjustified, the
competent court may call the meeting.
Shareholders are informed of all shareholders’ meetings to
be held by publication of a notice in the Official Journal of
the Italian Republic (Gazzetta Ufficiale) at least
30 days before the date fixed for the meeting (20 days
if the meeting is called at the request of holders of at least
10% of the issued shares). The above formalities and terms
regarding the call notice may be reduced in other very limited
circumstances. As a matter of practice, the Company publishes
this notice in at least two national daily newspapers, as
recommended by CONSOB.
Shareholders’ meetings must be convened at least once a
year. Enel’s annual unconsolidated financial statements are
prepared by its board of directors and submitted for approval to
the ordinary shareholders’ meeting, which must be convened
within 120 days after the end of the fiscal year to which
such financial
165
statements relate. This term may be extended to up to
180 days after the end of the fiscal year, bound by law to
draw up consolidated financial statements or if particular
circumstances concerning Enel’s structure or purposes so
require. At ordinary shareholders’ meetings, shareholders
also appoint the external auditors, approve the distribution of
dividends, appoint the board of directors and statutory
auditors, determine their remuneration and vote on any business
matter the resolution or authorization of which is entrusted to
them by law.
Extraordinary shareholders’ meetings may be called to pass
upon dissolutions, appointment of receivers and similar
extraordinary actions. Extraordinary shareholders’ meetings
may also be called to resolve upon proposed amendments to the
by-laws, issuance of convertible debentures or mergers and
de-mergers, capital increases and reductions, where such
resolutions may not be taken by Enel’s board of directors.
In particular, the board of directors may resolve upon the
issuance of shares or convertible debentures only if such powers
have been previously delegated to it by the extraordinary
shareholders’ meeting. Please see also
“— Board of Directors.”
The notice of a shareholders’ meeting may specify up to two
meeting dates for an ordinary or extraordinary
shareholders’ meeting; such meeting dates are generally
referred to as “calls.” Ordinary and extraordinary
meetings may be convened on third call through a new notice if
the quorum required for shareholder action on second call is not
reached.
The quorum required for shareholder action at an ordinary
shareholders’ meeting on first call is at least 50% of the
total number of issued shares, while on second or third call
there is no quorum requirement. In all cases, resolutions may be
approved by holders of the majority of the shares present or
represented at the meeting. The quorum required at an
extraordinary shareholders’ meeting on first, second and
third call is at least 50%, more than one-third and at least
one-fifth, respectively, of Enel’s issued shares.
Resolutions of any extraordinary shareholders’ meeting
require the approval of at least two-thirds of the holders of
shares present or represented at such meeting.
Shareholders’ meetings may be attended only by shareholders
with voting rights, whose financial intermediary shall have
delivered to Enel, at least two days prior to the date set for
the relevant meeting, a notice entitling the shareholder to
attend the meeting. Once the above notice is communicated to
Enel by the relevant intermediary, if the shareholder disposes
of the shares, he loses the right to attend the meeting.
Shareholders may attend the shareholders’ meeting by proxy.
A proxy may be given only for a single shareholders’
meeting (including, however, the first, second and third calls
of such meeting), except as part of a general power of attorney
or a power of attorney granted by a corporation, association,
foundation or any other legal entity to one of its employees. A
proxy may be exercised only by the person expressly named in the
applicable form. The person exercising the proxy cannot be a
subsidiary, director, statutory auditor or employee of Enel or
of any of its subsidiaries. Proxies may be solicited by an
Intermediary (banks or investment companies, asset management
companies and companies having proxy solicitation as their sole
purpose) on behalf of a qualified soliciting shareholder (a
shareholder who owns and has owned at least 0.5%, or such lesser
percentage determined by CONSOB, of Enel’s voting capital
for at least six months and who has been registered with Enel as
holder of such shares for the same period of time). Proxies may
also be collected by a shareholders’ association from among
its members, subject to certain conditions. Please see
“— Voting Rights.” CONSOB has established
provisions which govern the transparency and proper performance
of the solicitation and collection of proxies.
Preemptive Rights
Pursuant to Italian law, holders of shares are entitled to
subscribe for new issuances of shares, debentures convertible
into shares and any other warrants, rights or options entitling
the holders to subscribe for shares in proportion to their
holdings, unless such issues are for non-cash consideration or
preemptive rights are waived or limited by a resolution adopted
at an extraordinary shareholders’ meeting by holders of a
majority of the issued shares. There can be no assurance that
the owners of ADSs will be able to exercise fully any preemptive
rights to which the holders of shares are entitled.
166
Reports to Shareholders
The Company is required by Italian regulation to publish audited
annual consolidated and unconsolidated financial statements in
the Italian language. The Company also produces an annual report
to shareholders in Italian and English which contains a
directors’ report together with the Company’s annual
audited consolidated and unconsolidated financial statements.
The Company is also required by CONSOB regulations to produce
semi-annual and quarterly reports to shareholders in the Italian
language containing a directors’ report and unaudited
consolidated semi-annual and quarterly condensed financial
statements, respectively (and, in the case of its semi-annual
statements only, unconsolidated financial statements as well).
The Company must also prepare annual reports on Form 20-F
to be filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange
Commission containing, among other things, the Company’s
audited annual consolidated financial statements.
For fiscal years through and including the year ended
December 31, 2004, the Company prepared all of its
financial statements in accordance with Italian GAAP. Since
January 1, 2005, the Company publishes audited annual
consolidated financial statements and unaudited semi-annual and
quarterly reports in conformity with IFRS. The Company will
publish its unconsolidated financial statements for the year
2005 in accordance with Italian GAAP. Please see
“Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and
Prospects — Process of Transition to International
Financial Reporting Standards” for a discussion of our
adoption of IFRS and significant differences between IFRS and
Italian GAAP.
Liquidation Rights
Pursuant to Italian law and subject to the satisfaction of the
claims of all creditors, holders of ordinary shares are entitled
to a distribution in liquidation that is equal to the value of
their shares (to the extent available out of the net assets of
the company).
The Company is permitted to purchase its own shares, subject to
its having received necessary authorization from the ordinary
shareholders’ meeting and to certain other conditions and
limitations provided by Italian law. Shares may be purchased
only out of profits available for dividends or out of
distributable reserves, in each case as appearing on the latest
shareholder-approved financial statements. In addition, Enel may
only repurchase fully paid-in shares. The number of shares to be
acquired, together with any shares previously acquired by Enel
or any of its subsidiaries may not (except in limited
circumstances) exceed in the aggregate 10% of the total number
of Enel’s shares then issued and the aggregate purchase
price of such shares may not exceed the amount specifically
approved by Enel’s shareholders. Shares held in excess of
such 10% limit must be sold within one year of the date of
purchase. Similar limitations apply with respect to purchases of
Enel’s shares carried out by Group subsidiaries.
A corresponding reserve equal to the purchase price of such
shares must be created in the balance sheet, and such reserve is
not available for distribution unless such shares are sold or
canceled. Shares purchased and held by Enel may be resold only
pursuant to a resolution of Enel’s shareholders adopted at
an ordinary shareholders’ meeting. The voting rights
attaching to the shares held by Enel or its subsidiaries cannot
be exercised, but the shares can be counted for quorum purposes
at shareholders’ meetings. Dividends and other rights,
including pre-emptive rights, attaching to such shares will
accrue to the benefit of other shareholders.
The TUF requires that the purchase by a listed company of its
own shares and the purchase of shares of a listed company by its
subsidiaries be carried out pursuant to the Italian Civil Code
so as to ensure equal treatment of the shareholders, in
accordance with procedures to be established by CONSOB. Subject
to certain limitations, the foregoing does not apply to shares
being purchased by a company from its employees or from the
employees of its controlling company or subsidiaries.
At the date hereof, Enel does not own, directly or indirectly,
any of its shares and is not currently authorized by its
shareholders to make such repurchases.
Notification of the Acquisition of Shares and Voting
Rights
Pursuant to Italian securities laws, including the TUF and
implementing CONSOB regulations, any acquisition of any interest
in excess of 2% in the voting shares of a company listed on an
Italian regulated
167
market must be notified to CONSOB and the company whose shares
are acquired. The voting rights attributable to the shares in
respect of which such notification has not been made may not be
exercised. Any resolution taken in violation of the foregoing
may be annulled if the resolution would not have been adopted in
the absence of such votes.
In addition, any person whose aggregate interest in the voting
shares of a listed company exceeds or falls below 2%, 5%, 7.5%,
10% and successive percentages being multiples of five,
respectively, of the listed company’s voting share capital,
is obliged to notify CONSOB and the issuer. For the purpose of
calculating these ownership thresholds, shares owned by any
person, irrespective of whether the voting rights attributable
thereto are exercisable by such person or by a third party, are
taken into consideration and, except in certain circumstances,
account must also be taken of shares held through, or shares the
voting rights of which are exercisable by, subsidiaries,
fiduciaries or intermediaries. For the purpose of calculating
the ownership thresholds of 5%, 10%, 25%, 50% and 75%, shares
which: (i) a person has an option to, directly or
indirectly, acquire or sell; and (ii) a person may acquire
further to the exercise of a warrant or conversion right which
is exercisable within 60 days, must also be taken into
account. The notification must be repeated when such person,
upon the exercise of the right referred to in (i) or
(ii) above, acquires or sells shares which cause his
aggregate ownership in the listed company to exceed or fall
below the relevant thresholds. Notification must be made (except
in certain circumstances) within five trading days of the event
which gives rise to the notification obligation.
Cross-ownership of listed companies may not exceed 2% of their
respective voting shares, and cross-ownership between a listed
company and an unlisted company may not exceed 2% of the voting
shares of the listed company and 10% of the voting shares of the
unlisted company. If the relative threshold is exceeded, the
company which is the latter to exceed such threshold may not
exercise the voting rights attributable to the shares in excess
of the threshold and must sell the excess shares within a period
of 12 months. If the company does not sell the excess
shares, it may not exercise the voting rights in respect of its
entire shareholding. If it is not possible to ascertain which is
the latter company to exceed the threshold, the limitation on
voting rights and the obligation to sell the excess shares
applies to both of the companies concerned, subject to an
agreement to the contrary between the two companies. The 2%
limit for cross-ownership in listed companies is increased to 5%
on the condition that such limit is exceeded by the two
companies concerned only following an agreement authorized in
advance by an ordinary shareholders’ meeting of each of
them. Furthermore, if a party holds an interest in excess of 2%
of a listed company’s share capital, such listed company or
the party which controls the listed company may not purchase an
interest above 2% in a listed company controlled by the first
party. In case of non-compliance, voting rights attributable to
the shares held in excess may not be exercised. If it is not
possible to ascertain which is the latter party to exceed the
limit, the limitation on voting rights applies to both, subject
to any different agreement between the two parties. Any
shareholders’ resolution approved in violation of the
limitation on voting rights may be annulled if the resolution
would not have been adopted in the absence of such votes. The
foregoing provisions in relation to cross ownership do not apply
when the thresholds are exceeded following a public tender offer
aimed at acquiring at least 60% of a company’s ordinary
shares or when a controlled company purchases shares of a
controlling company within the limits set forth in
Article 2359 bis of the Italian civil code and
following the procedures described under
“— Purchase by the Company of its Own
Shares”; however, certain restrictions on the manner of
purchase apply.
Pursuant to the TUF, agreements among shareholders of a listed
company or of its parent company regarding the exercise of
voting rights must be notified to CONSOB within five days,
published in summary form in the press within 10 days and
filed with the Chamber of Commerce within 15 days. Failure
to comply with the above rules renders the agreements null and
void and the shares cannot be voted. These rules apply also to
shareholders’ agreements which:
(i) concern (including prior consultation for) the exercise
of voting rights in a listed company or its controlling company;
(ii) contain limitations on the transfer of shares or
securities which grant the right to purchase or subscribe shares
of the companies mentioned in (i) above;
(iii) provide for the purchase of shares or securities
mentioned in (ii) above; or
168
(iv) have as their object or effect the exercise (including
joint exercise) of a dominant influence over a listed company or
its controlling company.
Any shareholders’ agreement of the nature described above
may have a maximum term of three years or, if executed for an
unlimited term, can be terminated by a party upon six
months’ prior notice. In case of a public tender offer,
shareholders who intend to participate in the tender offer may
withdraw from the agreement without notice, such withdrawal
being effective only in the event that the relevant shares are
actually sold.
CONSOB regulations specify the method and content of the
notification and publication of the agreements as well as of
subsequent amendments thereto. The regulation also provides that
any party to an agreement regarding the exercise of voting
rights or referred to in (i) and (iv) above concerning
more than 5% of the listed company’s share capital is
obliged to notify CONSOB and the listed company in question of
its overall shareholding in the listed company, unless such
information has already been notified in compliance with other
provisions of the TUF.
In accordance with Italian antitrust laws, the Antitrust
Authority may prohibit any acquisition of control in a company
which would create or strengthen a dominant position in the
domestic market or a significant part thereof and result in the
elimination or substantial reduction, on a lasting basis, of
competition, provided that certain turnover thresholds are
exceeded. However, if the turnover of the acquiring party and
the company to be acquired exceed certain higher turnover
thresholds, the antitrust review of the acquisition falls within
the exclusive jurisdiction of the European Commission.
Minority Shareholders’ Rights
Shareholders’ resolutions which are not adopted in
conformity with applicable law or Enel’s by-laws may be
challenged (with certain limitations and exceptions) within
90 days by absent, dissenting or abstaining shareholders
representing individually or in the aggregate at least 0.1% of
Enel’s share capital (as well as by the Company’s
board of directors or board of statutory auditors). Shareholders
not reaching this threshold or shareholders not entitled to vote
at Enel’s meetings may only claim damages deriving from the
resolution, unless otherwise provided by Enel’s by-laws.
Enel’s by-laws currently do not contain any such provision.
Dissenting or absent shareholders may require Enel to buy back
their shares for the average closing price of the previous six
months as a result of shareholders’ resolutions approving,
among other things, material modifications of the company’s
corporate purpose or of the voting rights of the Company’s
shares, the transformation of the Company from a stock
corporation into a different legal entity, the transfer of
Enel’s registered seat outside Italy or the de-listing of
Enel’s shares from Telematico.
Any shareholder may bring to the attention of the board of
statutory auditors facts or acts which are deemed wrongful. If
such shareholders represent more than 2% of Enel’s share
capital, the board of statutory auditors must investigate
without delay and report its findings and recommendations to the
shareholders’ meeting.
Shareholders representing more than 5% of Enel’s share
capital have the right to report to the competent court serious
breaches of the duties of the directors which may be prejudicial
to the Company or to its subsidiaries. In addition, shareholders
representing at least 5% of Enel’s share capital may
commence derivative suits before the competent court against the
Company’s directors, statutory auditors and general
managers. Enel may waive or settle the suit unless shareholders
holding at least 5% of the shares vote against such waiver or
settlement. Enel will reimburse the legal costs of such action
in the event that the claim of such shareholders is successful
and the court does not award such costs against the relevant
directors, statutory auditors or general managers.
Under Italian law, the by-laws of privatized companies that
impose a maximum limit on the number of shares that may be held
by any shareholder must provide for the election of directors
and statutory auditors through the voting list system provided
under the privatization law to ensure that minority shareholders
of a company are represented on its board of directors and board
of statutory auditors. Accordingly, Enel’s by-laws require
that members of the board of directors and board of statutory
auditors, except for the non-voting director, if any, appointed
by the MEF (please see “— Special Powers of the
MEF”), be elected on the basis
169
of candidate lists presented either by the board of directors or
by one or more shareholders, including the MEF, representing in
the aggregate at least 1% of Enel’s share capital having
the right to vote at ordinary shareholders’ meetings; the
outgoing board of directors may present a candidate list for the
election of the new board of directors.
Such candidate lists must be deposited at Enel’s registered
office and published in at least three Italian newspapers having
general circulation in Italy, two of which must be daily
business newspapers. Publication of the candidate list presented
by the board of directors must occur at least 20 days
before the first call of the shareholders’ meeting or
10 days in the case of candidate lists proposed by
shareholders. Each shareholder may present or join in the
presentation of only one candidate list and each candidate may
appear on only one list.
Under Enel’s by-laws, the election of the members of the
board of directors, other than the non-voting director, if any,
appointed by the MEF through the exercise of its special powers,
will proceed as follows:
•
seven-tenths of the members to be elected will be drawn from the
candidate list that receives the majority of votes expressed by
the shareholders in the numerical order in which they appear on
the list, rounded off in the event of a fractional number to the
next lower number; and
•
The remaining board members will be drawn from the other
candidate lists; for this purpose, the votes obtained by each
such list will be divided by one, two, three and so forth up to
the number of directors to be elected. The numbers obtained
through this process are attributed to the candidates of each
list in the order in which such candidates rank in the list. The
candidates of the various lists are ranked in a single ranking
and in decreasing order on the basis of the numbers attributed
to each of them. The candidates with the highest numbers are
elected.
The election of members of the board of statutory auditors is
governed by the same rules applicable to the election of the
board of directors, except that the latter may not present a
candidate list for the board of statutory auditors, and that,
under Italian law, if Enel’s by-laws provide that
Enel’s board of statutory auditors consists of four or more
members, at least two of them must be appointed by minority
shareholders. Enel’s current by-laws provide that the board
of statutory auditors consists of three auditors, of which
minority shareholders have the right to appoint one, and two
alternate auditors, of which minority shareholders have the
right to appoint one. The first candidate of the list who
receives the most votes becomes chairman of Enel’s board of
statutory auditors.
Tender Offer Rules
Pursuant to the TUF, a public tender offer must be made by any
person that, by reason of its purchases of shares, holds more
than 30% of the shares of an Italian company listed on an
Italian regulated market entitling their holders to vote on the
appointment or revocation of the directors or the commencement
of derivative suits against them (for purposes of this section,
and as applicable to Enel’s shares, the “Ordinary
Shares”). The tender offer must cover all the Ordinary
Shares of the listed company. Similarly, a tender offer for all
the Ordinary Shares of a listed company must be made by any
person who, having more than 30% of the Ordinary Shares without
exercising majority voting rights at ordinary shareholders’
meetings, acquires — by way of acquisition or exercise
of subscription or conversion rights — during a
12-month period more than an additional 3% of the Ordinary
Shares. Moreover, according to a release issued by CONSOB if, as
a result of a share buy-back effected by a listed company, the
controlling shareholder of that company holds more than 30% of
the outstanding Ordinary Shares (i.e., exclusive of treasury
stock), the obligation to launch a tender offer is triggered.
Likewise, the obligation to launch a tender offer is triggered
when a share buy-back results in an increase of more than 3% of
the outstanding Ordinary Shares owned by the controlling
shareholder originally holding more than 30% but less than 50%
of the company’s outstanding Ordinary Shares. The offer
must be launched within thirty days from the date on which the
relevant threshold was exceeded, at a price not lower than the
average of the weighted average of the market price for the
shares in the previous twelve months, and the highest price paid
for the Ordinary Shares by the offeror in the same period.
Under Regulation No. 11971, a purchaser is exempted
from the tender offer obligation when: (i) the
purchaser’s equity interest, as a result of an acquisition,
does not exceed the 30% threshold by more than 3% (provided that
the purchaser commits (a) not to exercise the voting rights
pertaining to any Ordinary Shares
170
exceeding the 30% threshold and (b) to sell any shares
exceeding the 30% threshold within 12 months from the date
of purchase), (ii) another person (or several persons
acting jointly) already owns more than 50% of the outstanding
Ordinary Shares, (iii) the 30% threshold is exceeded as a
result of a capital increase in connection with a debt
restructuring plan approved by CONSOB, (iv) the 30%
threshold is exceeded as a result of transfers of Ordinary
Shares among related persons, (v) the 30% threshold is
exceeded as a result of the exercise of pre-emptive rights,
(vi) the 30% threshold is exceeded through mergers or
demergers having an industrial purpose, approved by the
shareholders of the company whose shares would otherwise be the
target of the tender offer. The TUF provides further that the
acquisition of an interest above 30% of the Ordinary Shares of a
company does not trigger the obligation to launch a 100% tender
offer if the person concerned has exceeded the threshold as a
result of a public tender offer launched on all of the Ordinary
Shares of the company. If a person exceeds the above 30%
threshold as a result of a public tender offer launched on 60%
or more, but on less than all, of the Ordinary Shares of the
company, the person concerned is exempted from the obligation to
launch a 100% tender offer if (i) the tender offer has been
approved by shareholders of the company holding a majority of
the Ordinary Shares (excluding the offeror and the current
majority shareholder), and (ii) the offeror (its
subsidiaries, controlling person, related companies and other
person connected to it by virtue, inter alia, of
shareholders’ agreements) has not acquired more than 1% of
the Ordinary Shares of the company in the preceding
12 months; CONSOB shall ensure compliance with these
conditions before allowing the offer to be launched. After such
an offer has been completed, the offeror nevertheless becomes
subject to the duty to launch an offer for 100% of the Ordinary
Shares if, in the course of the subsequent 12 months,
(i) it (or its affiliates) purchases more than an
additional 1% of the Ordinary Shares of the company, or
(ii) if the company approves a merger or split-up.
Finally, the TUF provides that anyone holding 90% or more of the
voting shares of a company must launch an offer for the
remaining voting shares unless an adequate distribution is
restored so as to ensure proper trading within a period of
120 days. Any shareholder holding more than 98% of the
voting shares of a listed company following a tender offer for
all such shares issued by the company, has the right to obtain
title to the remaining shares within four months after the end
of the tender offer if it has stated in the offer document its
intention to make such an acquisition at a price set by a
court-appointed expert.
Under Italian law, companies and other entities that, acting in
their own interest or the interest of third parties, mismanage a
company subject to their direction and coordination powers are
liable to such company’s shareholders and creditors for
ensuing damages. This liability is excluded if (i) the
ensuing damage is fully eliminated, including through subsequent
transactions, or (ii) the damage is effectively offset by
the global benefits deriving in general to the company from the
continuing exercise of such direction and coordination powers.
Direction and coordination powers are presumed to exist, among
other things, with respect to consolidated subsidiaries.
Significant Differences in Corporate Governance Practices for
Purposes of
Section 303A.11 of the NYSE Listed Company Manual
Overview
Corporate governance rules for Italian stock corporations
(società per azioni) like Enel whose shares are
listed on the Italian stock exchange are set forth in the
Italian civil code, in the TUF and in the corporate governance
rules set forth by the voluntary code of corporate governance
issued by Borsa Italiana (the “Corporate Governance
Code”). As described in more detail below, Italian
corporate governance rules differ in a number of ways from those
applicable to U.S. domestic companies under NYSE listing
standards, as set forth in the NYSE Listed Company Manual.
As a general rule, Enel’s main corporate bodies are
governed by the Italian civil code and the TUF and are assigned
specific powers and duties that are legally binding and from
which there can be no derogation. The Corporate Governance Code
builds on the general framework provided for by the Italian
civil code and the TUF and sets forth recommendations for
responsible corporate governance intended to reflect generally
accepted best practice. While these recommendations are not
legally binding, the regulations issued by Borsa
171
Italiana require that listed companies issue an annual
compliance report disclosing which recommendations, if any, are
not being followed and why. The annual compliance report must
also contain a general description of Enel’s corporate
governance system. As stated in the Company’s annual
compliance report issued in March 2005, Enel is substantially in
compliance with the recommendations set forth in the Corporate
Governance Code.
Enel follows the traditional system of Italian corporate
governance, which provides for two main corporate governing
bodies — the board of directors and the board of
statutory auditors. This system contrasts with the unitary
system envisaged for U.S. domestic companies by the NYSE
listing standards, which contemplate the board of
directors’ serving as the sole governing body. Please see
“— By-laws — Board of Directors”
and “— By-laws — Statutory
Auditors” above for a description of the powers and duties
of the Company’s board of directors and board of statutory
auditors, respectively. The two boards are separate and no
individual may be a member of both boards. Both the members of
the board of directors and the members of the board of statutory
auditors owe duties of loyalty and care to us.
As required by Italian law, a firm of outside auditors is in
charge of auditing Enel’s financial statements. The members
of Enel’s board of directors and board of statutory
auditors, as well as Enel’s external auditors, are directly
and separately appointed by the shareholders at a general
meeting.
As recommended by the Corporate Governance Code, moreover,
Enel’s board of directors also established an internal
control committee which is mainly responsible for assessing the
adequacy of our internal control system and accounting standards
and for relations with outside auditors and essentially advises,
assists and makes proposals to the Company’s board of
directors with respect to all such matters. Enel’s internal
control committee has previously been composed of three
non-executive directors, who qualified as independent under the
rules of the Corporate Governance Code described below. Enel
expects its new board of directors, elected on May 26,2005, to appoint a new internal control committee having a
similar composition to the previous one in the near future.
Please see “Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and
Employees — Directors.” However, as explained in
more detail below, this committee does not serve as Enel’s
“audit committee” for purposes of Rule 10A-3
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
“Exchange Act”) or NYSE listing standards.
The Company has set out in the following summary the significant
differences between Italian corporate governance rules and
practices as Enel has implemented them and those applicable to
U.S. issuers under NYSE listing standards, as set forth in
the NYSE Listed Company Manual.
Independent Directors
NYSE domestic company standards. The NYSE listing
standards applicable to U.S. companies provide that
“independent” directors must comprise a majority of
the board. In order for a director to be considered
“independent,” the board of directors must
affirmatively determine that the director has no
“material” direct or indirect relationship with the
company. These relationships “can include commercial,
industrial, banking, consulting, legal, accounting, charitable
and familial relationships, among others.” More
specifically, a director is not independent if such director or
a member of his/her immediate family has certain specified
relationships with the company, its parent, any consolidated
subsidiary, its internal or external auditors, or any company
that has significant business relationships with the company,
its parent or any consolidated subsidiary. Ownership of a
significant amount of stock, by itself, is not a per se
bar to independence. In addition, a three-year period
following the termination of any relationship that compromised a
director’s independence must lapse before that director can
again be considered independent.
Enel’s practice. In Italy, directors’
independence is the subject of a recommendation of the Corporate
Governance Code, rather than mandated by law, and is
periodically assessed by the board of directors. The Corporate
Governance Code recommends that the board of directors include a
number of non-executive directors (i.e., who are not members of
our senior management) such that their views carry significant
weight in the adoption of the board’s resolutions. It also
recommends that an adequate number of non-executive directors be
“independent.”
Directors’ independence is assessed on the basis of a few
general principles, rather than detailed rules. Under the
Corporate Governance Code, a director is not considered
independent if he or she (i) has
172
significant relationships of an economic nature, directly,
indirectly or on behalf of third parties, with the issuer or its
affiliates (that is, its subsidiaries, executive directors or
controlling shareholder(s)) which may unduly influence the
directors’ autonomous judgment; (ii) holds, directly,
indirectly or on behalf of third parties, an equity interest
affording control or a significant influence over the issuer;
(iii) is a party to a shareholders’ agreement for the
control of the issuer; or (iv) has close family relations
with an executive director or other persons who do not
themselves qualify as independent. The Corporate Governance Code
recommends a three-year cooling off period for individuals who
were employees and/or directors of a relevant company and a
one-year cooling off period with respect to other relationships
of an economic nature. As of the date hereof, Enel’s board
of directors consists of nine members, eight of whom are
non-executive directors.
In addition, the members of Enel’s board of statutory
auditors must meet independence requirements mandated by Italian
law. As with directors, statutory auditors’ independence is
assessed on the basis of a few general principles, rather than
detailed rules. In particular, a person who (i) is a
director, or the spouse or a close relative of a director, of
the Company or any of its affiliates; (ii) has an
employment or consulting or similar relationship with the
Company or any of its affiliates; or (iii) has an economic
relationship with Enel or any of its affiliates which might
compromise his/her independence, cannot be appointed to the
Company’s board of statutory auditors. Although there is no
formal cooling-off requirement, statutory auditors who are
registered chartered accountants and have had a regular or
material consulting relationship with Enel or its affiliates
within two years prior to the appointment, or have been employed
by, or served as directors of, Enel or its affiliates, within
three years prior to the appointment, may be suspended or
cancelled from the register of chartered public accountants.
Finally, Enel is required to provide in its bylaws a mechanism
to permit stockholders to propose alternative lists of
candidates for the board of statutory auditors. Please see
“Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and
Employees — Board of Statutory Auditors” and
“— By-Laws — Minority
Shareholders’ Rights.”
Executive Sessions
NYSE domestic company standards. In order to empower
non-management directors of U.S. companies listed on the
NYSE to serve as a more effective check on management,
non-management directors must meet regularly in executive
sessions, and, if the board includes directors who are not
independent, the independent directors should meet alone in an
executive session at least once a year.
Enel’s practice. In Italy, neither non-executive
directors nor independent directors are required to meet in
executive sessions. The members of Enel’s board of
statutory auditors are required to meet at least once every
90 days.
Audit Committee and Internal Audit Function
NYSE domestic company standards. U.S. companies
listed on the NYSE are required to establish an audit committee
that satisfies the requirements of Rule 10A-3 under the
Exchange Act and certain additional requirements set by the
NYSE. In particular, all members of this committee must be
independent and the committee must adopt a written charter. The
committee’s prescribed responsibilities include
(i) the appointment, compensation, retention and oversight
of the external auditors; (ii) establishing procedures for
the handling of “whistleblower” complaints;
(iii) discussion of financial reporting and internal
control issues and critical accounting policies (including
through executive sessions with the external auditors);
(iv) the approval of audit and non-audit services performed
by the external auditors; and (v) the adoption of an annual
performance evaluation. Each company must also have an internal
audit function, which may be out-sourced, except to its
independent auditor.
Enel’s practice. Rule 10A-3 under the Exchange
Act provides an exemption from certain of the audit committee
requirements under the rule for foreign private issuers with a
board of statutory auditors established in accordance with local
law or listing requirements and meeting specified requirements
with regard to independence and responsibilities (including the
performance of most of the specific tasks assigned to audit
committees by the rule, to the extent permitted by local law)
(the “Statutory Auditor Requirements”). Enel is in the
process of determining what specific functions its board of
statutory auditors will assume in order to fulfill the Statutory
Auditor Requirements, as the Company intends to qualify for this
exemption by the time it is required to comply with
Rule 10A-3 on July 31, 2005. Enel also has an internal
audit function, which it has
173
not outsourced, and an internal control committee to be
reappointed in the near future, as noted above, in accordance
with the Corporate Governance Code. Please see
“Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and
Employees — Directors.”
Compensation Committee
NYSE domestic company standards. Under NYSE standards,
the compensation of the CEO of U.S. companies listed on the
NYSE must be approved by a compensation committee (or
equivalent) composed entirely of independent directors. The
compensation committee must also make recommendations to the
board of directors with regard to the compensation of other
executive officers, incentive compensation plans and
equity-based plans that are subject to board of directors’
approval. Disclosure of individual management compensation
information for these companies is mandated by the Exchange
Act’s proxy rules, from which foreign private issuers are
generally exempt.
Enel’s practice. Compensation of the chairman of
Enel’s board of directors, its CEO and other members of the
board of directors vested with particular offices is proposed by
Enel’s compensation committee and approved by the board of
directors, after consultation with the board of statutory
auditors. Senior management compensation policies are proposed
by Enel’s CEO, evaluated by the compensation committee and
approved by the board of directors. Our equity-based
compensation plans are adopted by Enel’s board of directors
upon proposal of the compensation committee. Please see
“— Stock Option Plans.” The Corporate
Governance Code recommends that a majority of the members of the
compensation committee be non-executive directors. Enel’s
compensation committee has previously been composed of three
non-executive directors, who qualified as independent under
Italian rules. Enel expects its new board of directors, elected
on May 26, 2005, to appoint a new compensation committee
having a similar composition to the previous one in the near
future. Please see “Item 6. Directors, Senior
Management and Employees — Directors.” The
Company discloses the compensation of each of the members of its
board of directors (including our CEO) and its board of
statutory auditors in the annual financial statements prepared
in accordance with Italian GAAP, and in Item 6 of this
annual report on Form 20-F.
Nominating Committee
NYSE domestic company standards. Under NYSE standards, a
U.S. company listed on the NYSE must have a
nominating/corporate governance committee (or equivalent)
composed entirely of independent directors that, among other
things, is responsible for nominating directors and board
committee members.
Enel’s practice. We do not have a nominating
committee. Directors may be nominated by any of Enel’s
shareholders or Enel’s board of directors.
Corporate Governance Guidelines/ Code of Business Conduct
and Ethics
NYSE domestic company standards. A U.S. company
listed on the NYSE must adopt corporate governance guidelines
and a code of business conduct and ethics for directors,
officers and employees. A company must also publish these items
on its website and provide printed copies on request.
Section 406 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 requires a
company to disclose whether it has adopted a code of ethics for
its principal executive officer, principal financial officer,
principal accounting officer or controller, or persons
performing similar functions, and if not, the reasons why it has
not done so. The NYSE listing standards applicable to
U.S. companies provide that codes of conduct and ethics
should address, at a minimum, conflicts of interest; corporate
opportunities; confidentiality; fair dealing; protection and
proper use of company assets; legal compliance; and encouraging
the reporting of illegal and unethical behavior. Corporate
governance guidelines must address, at a minimum,
directors’ qualification standards, responsibilities and
compensation; directors’ access to management and
independent advisers; management succession; director
orientation and continuing education; and an annual performance
evaluation of the board.
Enel’s practice. Enel has adopted certain corporate
governance guidelines (including with respect to its internal
control system, significant transactions, management and
handling of confidential information and internal dealing), a
compliance program to prevent certain criminal offenses and a
code of conduct for our directors, employees and others acting
on our behalf. As noted in Item 16B of this annual report,
Enel has also adopted a code of ethics as defined in
Section 406 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.
174
Enel believes that its codes of conduct and ethics address the
relevant issues contemplated by the NYSE standards applicable to
U.S. companies noted above. The Company’s corporate
governance guidelines, on the other hand, do not address all of
the issues contemplated by the NYSE domestic company
standards.
As noted above, Enel must issue an annual report describing its
corporate governance system and disclosing the level of its
compliance with the recommendations of the Corporate Governance
Code. This report and all the Company’s guidelines,
programs and codes are available, both in English and in
Italian, on Enel’s website at www.enel.it in the
“Investor relations — Corporate Governance”
section. Information appearing on the website is not
incorporated by reference into this annual report.
Certifications as to Violations of NYSE Standards
NYSE domestic company standards. Under NYSE listing
standards, the chief executive officer of a U.S. company
listed on the NYSE must certify annually to the NYSE that he or
she is unaware of any violation by the company of the NYSE
corporate governance listing standards, and to disclose that
such certification has been made in the company’s annual
report to shareholders (or, if no annual report to shareholders
is prepared, its annual report on Form 10-K). The chief
executive officer must also promptly notify the NYSE in writing
if any executive officer of the company becomes aware of any
material non-compliance with the NYSE corporate governance
listing standards. A U.S. company listed on the NYSE must
also submit an annual written affirmation to the NYSE, within
30 days of its annual shareholders’ meeting and in a
form specified by the NYSE, regarding its compliance with
applicable NYSE corporate governance standards. A
U.S. company listed on the NYSE is further required to
submit an interim written affirmation to the NYSE upon the
occurrence of specified events, including changes to the board
of directors or its audit, nominating/corporate governance or
compensation committees and changes in the status of independent
directors.
Enel’s practice. Under the NYSE rules, as of
July 31, 2005, Enel is required to submit an annual written
affirmation to the NYSE, in a form specified by the NYSE,
regarding the Company’s compliance with applicable NYSE
corporate governance standards. In 2005, we will be required to
submit this written affirmation by August 30. In subsequent
years, Enel will be required to submit an annual affirmation
within 30 days of the filing of its annual report on
Form 20-F with the SEC. Following submission of the
Company’s initial annual written affirmation, Enel will
also be required to submit to the NYSE an interim written
affirmation, in a form specified by the NYSE, any time Enel is
no longer eligible to rely on, or chooses to no longer rely on,
a previously applicable exemption provided by Exchange Act
Rule 10A-3, or, to the extent Enel has an audit committee
as defined in Rule 10A-3, if a member of such audit
committee ceases to be deemed independent or an audit committee
member had been added. In addition, under NYSE rules, the
Company’s chief executive officer must notify the NYSE in
writing if any executive officer becomes aware of any material
non-compliance by Enel with NYSE corporate governance standards.
Shareholder Approval of Adoption and Modification of
Equity Compensation Plans
NYSE domestic company standards. Shareholders of a
U.S. company listed on the NYSE must approve the adoption
of, and any material revision to, the company’s equity
compensation plans, with certain exceptions.
Enel’s practice. Although Enel’s shareholders
must authorize (i) the issuance of shares in connection
with capital increases, and (ii) the buy-back and resale of
the Company’s own shares; the adoption of equity
compensation plans does not per se require prior
shareholders’ approval.
On May 26, 2005, we entered into an agreement for the sale
of Wind to Weather in a series of transactions. For additional
details regarding the agreement, see “Item 4.
Information on the Company — Business — The
Enel Group — Telecommunications.”
175
Exchange Controls
No exchange control consent is required in Italy for the
transfer to persons outside of Italy of dividends or other
distributions with respect to, or of the proceeds from the sale
of, shares of an Italian company.
However, Italian resident and non-resident investors who
transfer, directly or indirectly (through banks or other
intermediaries) into or out of Italy, cash, investments or other
securities in excess of
€12,500 must
report all such transfers to the Italian Exchange Office
(“Ufficio Italiano Cambi” or “UIC”).
In the case of indirect transfers, banks or other intermediaries
are required to maintain records of all such transfers for five
years for inspection by Italian tax and judicial authorities.
Non-compliance with these reporting and record-keeping
requirements may result in administrative fines or, in the case
of false reporting or in certain cases of incomplete reporting,
criminal penalties. The UIC is required to maintain reports for
a period of ten years and may use such reports, directly or
through other government offices, to police money laundering,
tax evasion and any other crime or violation.
Individuals, non-profit entities and partnerships that are
residents of Italy must disclose on their annual tax returns all
investments and financial assets held outside Italy, as well as
the total amount of transfers to, from, within and between
countries other than Italy relating to such foreign investments
or financial assets, even if at the end of the taxable period
foreign investments or financial assets are no longer owned. No
such tax disclosure is required if (i) the foreign
investments or financial assets are exempt from income tax; or
(ii) the total value of the foreign investments or
financial assets at the end of the taxable period or the total
amount of the transfers effected during the fiscal year does not
exceed €12,500.
Corporate residents of Italy are exempt from these tax
disclosure requirements with respect to their annual tax returns
because this information is required to be discussed in their
financial statements.
We cannot assure you that the present regulatory environment in
or outside Italy will continue or that particular policies
presently in effect will be maintained, although Italy is
required to maintain certain regulations and policies by virtue
of its membership of the European Union and other international
organizations and its adherence to various bilateral and
multilateral international agreements.
Taxation
The following is a summary of certain United States federal and
Italian tax matters. The summary contains a description of the
principal United States federal and Italian tax consequences of
the purchase, ownership and disposition of ordinary shares or
ADSs by a holder who is a citizen or resident of the United
States or a U.S. corporation or who otherwise will be
subject to United States federal income tax on a net income
basis in respect of the ordinary shares or ADSs (a
“U.S. holder”). This summary does not purport to
be a comprehensive description of all of the tax considerations
that may be relevant to a decision to purchase ordinary shares
or ADSs. In particular, the summary deals only with beneficial
owners who will hold ordinary shares or ADSs as capital assets
and does not address the tax treatment of a beneficial owner who
owns 10% or more of Enel’s voting shares or who may be
subject to special tax rules, such as banks, tax-exempt
entities, insurance companies or dealers in securities or
currencies, or persons that will hold ordinary shares or ADSs as
a position in a “straddle” for tax purposes or as part
of a “constructive sale” or a “conversion”
transaction or other integrated investment comprised of ordinary
shares or ADSs and one or more other investments. Nor does this
summary discuss the treatment of ordinary shares or ADSs that
are held in connection with a permanent establishment through
which a non-resident beneficial owner carries on or performs
personal services in Italy.
The summary is based upon tax laws and practice of the United
States and Italy as in effect on the date of this annual report.
Prospective purchasers and current holders of ordinary shares or
ADSs are advised to consult their own tax advisors as to the
U.S., Italian or other tax consequences of the purchase,
beneficial ownership and disposition of ordinary shares or ADSs,
including, in particular, the effect of any state, local or
national tax laws.
For purposes of the summary, beneficial owners of ordinary
shares or ADSs who are considered residents of the United States
for purposes of the current income tax convention between the
United States and Italy (the “Income Tax Convention”),
and are not subject to an anti-treaty shopping provision that
applies in
176
limited circumstances, are referred to as
“U.S. holders.” Beneficial owners who are
citizens or residents of the United States, corporations
organized under U.S. law, and U.S. partnerships,
estates or trusts (to the extent their income is subject to
U.S. tax either directly or in the hands of partners or
beneficiaries) generally will be considered to be residents of
the United States under the Income Tax Convention. Special rules
apply to U.S. holders that are also residents of Italy. A
new tax treaty to replace the current Income Tax Convention was
signed on August 25, 1999, but has not yet been ratified by
Italy. The new treaty would not change significantly the
provisions of the current Income Tax Convention that are
discussed below (except that it would clarify the availability
of benefits to certain tax-exempt organizations). These laws are
subject to change, possibly on a retroactive basis. Unless
otherwise stated, this summary assumes that a U.S. holder
is eligible for the benefits of the Income Tax Convention.
For purposes of the Income Tax Convention and the United States
Internal Revenue Code of 1986, or the Code, holders of American
Depositary Receipts evidencing ADSs will be treated as the
beneficial owners of the underlying ordinary shares represented
by those ADSs.
Withholding Tax on Dividends
Italian law provides for the withholding of income tax at a 27%
rate on dividends paid by Italian companies to shareholders who
are not residents of Italy for tax purposes. Accordingly, the
amount initially made available to the Depositary for payment to
U.S. holders will reflect withholding at the 27% rate.
Under domestic Italian law, a non-resident holder of shares of
common stock may recover up to four-ninths of the tax withheld
on dividends by presenting evidence to the Italian tax
authorities that income tax has been fully paid on the dividends
in the non-resident holder’s country of residence in an
amount at least equal to the total refund claimed. Non-resident
holders seeking such payments from the Italian tax authorities
have experienced extensive delays and incurred expenses.
Alternatively, the 27% withholding tax may be reduced pursuant
to an income tax convention between Italy and the non-resident
holder’s country of residence. Generally, a reduced 15%
withholding tax would be levied under the Income Tax Convention.
Under current Italian law, all shares of Italian listed
companies (including the ordinary shares) must be held in a
centralized clearing system authorized by CONSOB. Under
applicable tax provisions, if the ordinary shares are held
through the centralized clearing system managed by Monte Titoli
(the only such system currently authorized in Italy), no
withholding tax on dividends is applied by the Company. Instead
of the withholding tax a substitute tax (imposta
sostitutiva) is applied on dividend distributions to
non-resident holders of ordinary shares (or ADSs relating to
such ordinary shares) at a rate equal to the withholding tax
that would otherwise be due. The substitute tax is applied by
the resident or non-resident intermediary with which the
ordinary shares are deposited and which participates in the
Monte Titoli system (directly or through a foreign centralized
clearing system participating in the Monte Titoli system). The
procedures to be followed by a non-resident holder in order for
the intermediary with which the ordinary shares are deposited to
apply a reduced rate of tax pursuant to an applicable income tax
convention are as follows. The intermediary must receive
(i) a declaration of the non-resident holder that contains
certain data identifying the non-resident holder and indicating
the existence of all the conditions necessary for the
application of the relevant income tax convention and the
determination of the applicable treaty rate of withholding and
(ii) a certification by the tax authorities of the
non-resident holder’s country of residence that the holder
is a resident of that country for purposes of the income tax
convention and, as far as it is known to such authorities, the
holder has no permanent establishment in Italy (which
certificate will be effective until March 31 of the year
following submission). If the ordinary shares are deposited with
a non-resident intermediary, such intermediary must appoint as
its fiscal representative in Italy a bank or an investment
services company that is resident in Italy, the permanent
establishment in Italy of a non-resident bank or investment
services company, or a company licensed to manage a centralized
depository and clearing system, to carry out all duties and
obligations relating to the application and administration of
the substitute tax.
Since the ordinary shares underlying the ADSs will be held by
the custodian in the centralized clearing system managed by
Monte Titoli, the substitute tax regime described above will
apply to the ADSs. In order to enable eligible U.S. holders
to obtain a reduction at source or a refund of withholding tax
under the Income
177
Tax Convention, the Company and the Depositary have agreed to
certain procedures. According to such procedures, the Depositary
will send holders of the ADSs certain instructions before the
dividend payment date specifying the documentation required and
the deadlines for submission. The documentation generally will
include the holder’s declaration and the tax certification
specified under points (i) and (ii) in the preceding
paragraph. In order to comply with the documentation described
under point (ii) above, eligible U.S. holders must
obtain a certificate of residence from the U.S. Internal
Revenue Service (“IRS”) (Form 6166) with respect
to each dividend payment, unless a previously filed
certification will be effective on the dividend payment date,
and produce it together with a statement whereby such holder
represents to be a U.S. resident individual or corporation
and not to maintain a permanent establishment in Italy. IRS
Form 6166 may be obtained by filing a request for
certification on IRS Form 8802. (Additional information,
including IRS Form 8802, can be obtained from the IRS
website at www.irs.gov. Information appearing on the IRS website
is not incorporated by reference into this document.) The time
for processing requests for certification by the IRS normally is
six to eight weeks. Accordingly, holders requiring this
certification must submit their requests to the IRS as soon as
possible after receiving instructions from the Depositary. In
the case of ADSs held through a broker or other financial
intermediary, the required documentation must be delivered to
such financial intermediary for transmission to the Depositary.
In all other cases, eligible U.S. holders must deliver the
required documentation directly to the Depositary at least five
business days prior to the date set for the payment of dividends.
If the documentation is not provided in the time allotted, or if
the intermediary (i.e., the custodian in the case of the ADSs)
determines that the produced documentation does not satisfy the
prescribed requirements or that applicable law does not permit
it to apply directly the reduced Income Tax Convention rate, the
intermediary will withhold tax at the 27% rate on the dividends
paid with respect to ADSs, and eligible U.S. holders will
be required to claim an Income Tax Convention refund of 12% of
the dividend (representing the difference between 27% and the
15% Income Tax Convention rate) directly from the Italian tax
authorities. U.S. residents seeking refunds from the
Italian tax authorities have encountered expenses and extensive
delays.
Distributions of profits in kind will be subject to withholding
tax. In that case, prior to receiving the distribution, the
holder will be required to provide the Company with the funds to
pay the relevant withholding tax.
The gross amount of dividends (that is, the amount before
reduction for Italian withholding tax) paid to U.S. holders
will be subject to U.S. federal income taxation as dividend
income and will not be eligible for the dividends-received
deduction allowed to domestic corporations. Dividends paid in
euros will be includible in the income of U.S. holders in a
U.S. dollar amount calculated by reference to the exchange
rate in effect on the day the dividends are received by the
Depositary. Subject to certain exceptions for short-term and
hedged positions, the U.S. dollar amount of dividends
received by an individual prior to January 1, 2009 with
respect to our ordinary shares or ADSs will be subject to
taxation at a maximum rate of 15% if the dividends are
“qualified dividends.” Dividends paid on our shares or
ADSs will be treated as qualified dividends if (i) the
issuer is eligible for the benefits of a comprehensive income
tax treaty with the United States that the IRS has approved for
the purposes of the qualified dividend rules and (ii) we
were not, in the year prior to the year in which the dividend
was paid, and are not, in the year in which the dividend is
paid, (a) a passive foreign investment company
(“PFIC”) or (b) for dividends paid prior to the
2005 tax year, a foreign personal holding company
(“FPHC”) or foreign investment company
(“FIC”). The Income Tax Convention has been approved
for the purposes of the qualified dividend rules. Based on our
audited financial statements and relevant market and shareholder
data, we believe that we were not treated as a PFIC, FPHC or FIC
for U.S. federal income tax purposes with respect to our
2003 or 2004 taxable year. In addition, based on our audited
financial statements and our current expectations regarding the
value and nature of our assets, the sources and nature of our
income, and relevant market and shareholder data, we do not
anticipate becoming a PFIC for our 2005 taxable year.
The U.S. Treasury has announced its intention to promulgate
rules pursuant to which holders of ADSs or ordinary shares and
intermediaries though whom such securities are held will be
permitted to rely on certifications from issuers to establish
that dividends are treated as qualified dividends. Because such
178
procedures have not yet been issued, it is not clear whether the
Company will be able to comply with them. Holders of ADSs and
ordinary shares should consult their own tax advisers regarding
the availability of the reduced dividend tax rate in the light
of their own particular circumstances.
If the Depositary converts the euro into dollars on the day it
receives them, U.S. holders generally must not realize
foreign currency gain or loss in respect of dividend income. A
U.S. holder who receives a treaty refund may be required to
recognize foreign currency gain or loss, which will be treated
as ordinary gain or loss, to the extent the amount of the treaty
refund (in dollars) received by the holder differs from the
dollar equivalent of the foreign currency amount of the treaty
refund on the date the dividends were received by the
Depositary. The Italian withholding tax (less any refund to
which such holder is entitled under the Income Tax Convention)
will be treated as a foreign income tax which such holders may
elect to deduct in computing their taxable income or, subject to
the limitations on foreign tax credits generally, credit against
their United States federal income tax liability. Dividends will
generally constitute foreign-source “passive income”
or “financial services income” for U.S. tax
purposes.
Foreign tax credits may not be allowed for withholding taxes
imposed in respect of certain short-term or hedged positions in
securities or in respect of arrangements in which a
U.S. owner’s expected economic profit is
insubstantial. U.S. owners should consult their own
advisers concerning the implications of these rules in light of
their particular circumstances.
Distributions of additional shares to U.S. holders with
respect to their ordinary shares or ADSs that are made as part
of a pro rata distribution to all of Enel’s shareholders
generally will not be subject to U.S. federal income tax.
Tax on capital gains
Capital gains realized by non-resident shareholders on the
disposal of a “qualified” shareholding held as a
capital asset and not in connection with a permanent
establishment through which such shareholders carry on or
perform business services in Italy are subject to Italian
personal or corporate income tax, for an amount equal to 40% of
the overall gain. Losses can be offset against taxable gains for
a corresponding amount and, if in excess, can be carried forward
up to four years. A “qualified” shareholding is
constituted by ordinary shares or ADSs and/or rights
representing more than 5% of Enel’s total share capital or
more than 2% of its share capital voting in the ordinary
shareholders meeting. A disposal of a “qualified”
shareholding occurs if in any 12-month period immediately
following the date when a shareholding meets one of the
thresholds illustrated above, the shareholder engages in
disposals of shares or ADSs that, individually or in aggregate,
constitute a “qualified” shareholding. The taxable
gain realized by a non-resident shareholder who is an individual
would be subject to progressive personal income tax rates
(currently, the marginal tax rate is equal to 43%, plus a
surcharge generally of up to 1.9%, depending on the municipality
in which such non-resident shareholder earns the highest
Italian-source income). The taxable gain realized by a
non-resident corporate shareholder would be subject to corporate
income tax, currently levied at a rate of 33%.
Generally, a capital gains tax (“CGT”), levied at a
rate of 12.5%, is imposed on gains realized upon the transfer or
sale of “non-qualified” shareholdings, whether held
within or outside Italy. A “non-qualified”
shareholding is constituted by an interest in Enel which does
not reach the thresholds described above. However, under
domestic law, an exemption applies to gains realized on the
disposal of “non-qualified” shareholdings in an
Italian company the shares of which are listed on a regulated
market, such as Enel’s shares, even when such shareholdings
are held in Italy.
Furthermore, pursuant to the Income Tax Convention, a
U.S. holder will not be subject to Italian tax on any
realized capital gains unless such U.S. holder has a
permanent establishment in Italy to which the ordinary shares or
ADSs are effectively connected. To this end, U.S. residents
selling ordinary shares or ADSs and claiming benefits under the
Income Tax Convention may be required to produce appropriate
documentation establishing that the above mentioned conditions
have been met. Other countries have executed income tax
conventions with Italy providing for a similar treatment of
Italian tax on capital gains. No tax on capital gains will be
imposed on the deposit or withdrawal of shares in return for
ADSs.
U.S. holders of ADSs will be subject to U.S. federal
income tax on any capital gains to the same extent as on other
gains from the disposition of stock. The net amount of long-term
capital gain recognized by an
179
individual holder after May 5, 2003 and before
January 1, 2009 generally is subject to taxation at a
maximum rate of 15%. The net long-term capital gain recognized
by an individual holder before May 6, 2003 generally is
subject to taxation at a maximum rate of 20%.
A non-U.S. holder will not be subject to U.S. federal
income tax on gain realized on the sale of ordinary shares or
ADSs unless (i) such gain is effectively connected with the
conduct by the non-U.S. holder of a trade or business in
the United States or (ii) in the case of gain realized by
an individual non-U.S. holder, the non-U.S. holder is
present in the United States for 183 days or more in the
taxable year of the sale and certain other conditions are met.
Taxation of Distributions from Capital Reserves
Special Italian tax rules apply to the distribution of capital
reserves. Under certain circumstances, such a distribution may
be considered as taxable income in the hands of the recipient
depending on the reserves of the distributing company
outstanding at the time of distribution and the actual nature of
the reserves distributed. The application of such rules may also
have an impact on the tax basis in the ordinary shares or ADSs
held and/or the characterization of any taxable income received
and the tax regime applicable to it. Non-resident shareholders
may be subject to withholding tax and CGT as a result of such
rules. You should consult your tax advisor in connection with
any distribution of capital reserves.
Transfer tax
An Italian transfer tax is normally payable on the transfer of
shares in an Italian company. The transfer tax will not be
payable with respect to any transfers of ordinary shares or ADSs
involving non-Italian residents concluded either on a regulated
market or with a bank or an investment services company.
Estate and gift tax
As of October 25, 2001, the Italian estate and gift tax has
been abolished and consequently any transfer of ordinary shares
or ADSs occurring by reason of death or gift as of that date is
no longer subject to any Italian estate and gift tax.
However, should a gift of shares or ADSs for a value exceeding
€180,759.91 (the
“Threshold”) occur and the relationship between the
donor and the beneficiary not qualify for the exemption regime
applicable to gifts made in favor of certain family members
(e.g., spouse, parents, children, grandchildren), a registration
tax of €168 would
be due insofar as the gift agreement is either executed or
registered in Italy. The materiality threshold is increased to
€516,456.91 in
cases where the beneficiary is a person with a handicap
recognized pursuant to applicable law.
Information reporting and backup withholding
Dividends paid on, and proceeds from the sale or other
disposition of, ordinary shares or ADSs paid to a
U.S. holder generally may be subject to information
reporting requirements and may be subject to backup withholding
unless the holder (i) establishes that it is a corporation
or other exempt holder or (ii) provides an accurate
taxpayer identification number on a properly completed Internal
Revenue Service Form W-9 and certifies that no loss of
exemption from backup withholding has occurred. The amount of
any backup withholding from a payment to a U.S. holder will
be allowed as a credit against the holder’s
U.S. federal income tax liability and may entitle such
holder to a refund, provided that certain required information
is furnished to the Internal Revenue Service.
A non-U.S. holder may be required to comply with
certification and identification procedures in order to
establish its exemption from information reporting and backup
withholding.
Documents On Display
Enel is subject to the information reporting requirements of the
Exchange Act applicable to foreign private issuers. In
accordance therewith, Enel is required to file reports and other
information with the U.S. Securities and Exchange
Commission. In particular, the Company is required to file
annual reports on Form 20-F by electronic means. These
materials, including this annual report on Form 20-F, are
available for
180
inspection and copying at the U.S. Securities and Exchange
Commission’s public reference facilities in Washington
D.C., New York, New York and Chicago, Illinois. Please call the
Commission at 1-800-SEC-0330 for further information on the
public reference rooms.
ITEM 11.
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURE ABOUT MARKET RISK
Price Risk Management and Market Risk Information
We purchase electricity from countries that use currencies other
than the euro and also purchase fuel in the international oil
and natural gas markets, where prices are generally denominated
in U.S. dollars. As a consequence, we are subject to market
risks from changes in foreign exchange rates and commodity
prices. We are also directly subject to interest rate risks
related to our financial indebtedness.
The system for the reimbursement of fuel costs through tariffs
that was in place through March 31, 2004 reduced our
commodity price and exchange rate risks from fuel purchases and
imports of electricity. This structure included a reimbursement
component for fuel costs and imports that was based on, among
other things, an index to the price of a basket of fuels on
international markets (which are generally priced in
U.S. dollars). This index was adjusted so that changes in
fuel costs and exchange rate fluctuations were reflected in the
levels of reimbursements and, as a consequence, in tariffs. As a
result, our commodity price and exchange rate exposures for fuel
purchases related mainly to the time lag between our incurrence
of fuel costs and the calculation period used to determine the
level of reimbursements.
In April 2004, the Italian power exchange became operational. As
a result, we are now facing the market risk arising from the
fact that prices on the market are determined by competitive
bidding among participants. However, under the current
regulatory framework, generation companies may also sell
electricity on the free market through freely negotiated
over-the-counter bilateral contracts with purchasers, and enter
into such contracts, as well as contracts for differences, with
the Single Buyer. Our use of bilateral contracts with purchasers
and contracts for differences with the Single Buyer is
contributing to reduce our power exchange risk exposure. In
addition, we believe that the potential impact of this market
risk vis-à-vis that faced by our competitors is mitigated
by the homogeneity of the cost structure of Italian generation
companies and by the limited import capacity of the transmission
lines that connect the Italian network with those of other
countries. Finally, for the amount of energy we sell in the
Italian power exchange and for which we do not enter in
contracts for differences with the Single Buyer, or bilateral
contracts indexed to fuel prices our hedging strategy is based
on our assessment of our exposure to changes in power exchange
prices as compared to our generation costs in Italy, using swaps
and other hedging instruments.
Our exchange rate exposure for electricity imports is
principally limited to imports denominated in Swiss francs. In
2004, approximately 49% of our electricity imports by value were
denominated in Swiss francs. The balance of our electricity
imports are denominated in euros, and we do not have an exchange
rate risk on these imports as a result. We actively manage the
exchange rate exposure on our accounts payable in Swiss francs
through the use of the instruments described below.
Almost all of our long-term debt is denominated in euros and as
a result is not subject to exchange rate risk. At
December 31, 2004, we were fully exposed to exchange rate
risk on only
€837 million
out of a total
€21,606 million
in outstanding long-term debt (including approximately
€600 million
of long-term debt which relates to our operating subsidiaries in
North America and Central South America and which is denominated
in the currency of the jurisdictions in which such subsidiaries
operate).
Our financial risk manager is responsible for analyzing,
monitoring and controlling our interest rate and foreign
exchange risk management activities, measuring actual risk
levels on our portfolio of financial instruments and monitoring
compliance with our policies. Our treasurer is responsible for
executing related financial operations. Senior management
provides these two members of our finance department with
guidance as to the strategic aspects of the management of our
debt portfolio.
Our calculation and measurement techniques are generally
consistent with international banking standards established by
the Basle Committee. Moreover, we believe that our policies
regarding risk levels are generally significantly more
conservative than those established by the Basle Committee.
181
With respect to commodity risk management, Enel Trade is the
company of our Group in charge of the commercial relations with
operators in the energy and fuel procurement markets, including
purchases of financial derivatives based on energy indexes for
hedging purposes. Under a strict Group risk management policy,
each company of the Group is assigned a maximum amount of risk
that it is allowed to maintain, and enters into derivatives with
Enel Trade in order to reduce its risk below the assigned
maximum allowed amount. Enel Trade aggregates the risk positions
on commodities from our companies through these intercompany
derivatives and purchases of commodities made by it. To reduce
the residual risk following these netting operations below the
maximum limit set annually by the Group’s policy, Enel
Trade uses cash-settled derivatives of the types described below
under “Commodity Price Risk.” Enel Trade’s use of
such derivative instruments is limited to hedging the
Group’s risks arising from changes in the prices of
physical commodities used in our operations, since we do not buy
and sell derivative instruments for trading or speculative
purposes.
We have used sensitivity analysis to estimate the market risk
exposure associated with our debt and with our foreign exchange,
interest rate and commodity derivatives. Market risk exposure
represents the change in the fair value of financial
instruments, including financial and commodity derivatives,
resulting from an assumed 10% adverse change in market prices or
rates. We determined fair value using pricing models that
measure the effect of changes in market prices according to
market practice for each category of financial instrument. We
have summarized the results of this sensitivity analysis in the
following paragraphs. Actual changes in market prices or rates
may differ from hypothetical changes.
The notional value of a derivative is the contractual amount on
the basis of which the differentials are exchanged. This amount
can be expressed either on a value basis or on a physical
quantities basis such as tons. Amounts expressed in a foreign
currency are converted into euro by applying the exchange rate
at end of the relevant period.
Foreign exchange risk
As explained above, our principal foreign exchange risk relates
to fuel costs and electricity imports. At December 31,2004, we also had foreign exchange risk exposure on
€837 million
in outstanding long-term debt denominated in currencies other
than the euro, which represented 3.9% of our total long-term
debt. Our exposure to foreign currency exchange rates is
primarily in respect of U.S. dollars for fuel purchases and
in respect of Swiss francs for electricity imports, though we
are also exposed to currency risk with regard to the small
proportion of our operations that use a functional currency
other than the euro.
We use forward exchange contracts and currency options in
managing our foreign exchange risk. As of December 31,2004, we had outstanding forward exchange contracts and options
used to hedge our several exchange risks with an aggregate
notional amount of
€1,870 million
(€2,384 million
as of December 31, 2003). In particular, we had:
•
contracts with a notional amount of
€855 million
used to hedge the foreign exchange risk related to fuel
purchases, electricity imports and expected cash flows in
currencies other than the euro
(€1,681 million
as of December 31, 2003); and
•
contracts with a notional amount of
€715 million
used to hedge the foreign exchange risk related to the repayment
of the commercial paper we issued in foreign currency
(€440 million
as of December 31, 2003).
We generally enter into these contracts with respect to the same
amount and date of a repayment obligation or the cash flow that
we expect to generate, thus any change in fair value of these
contracts deriving from a possible appreciation or depreciation
of the euro against other currencies would be fully offset by a
corresponding change in the fair value of the underlying
position.
At the end of 2004, we also had in place
€215 million
of foreign exchange forward contracts
(€153 million
at December 31, 2003) and
€85 million
of options
(€110 million
at December 31, 2003) used to hedge any residual foreign
exchange risk on an aggregate basis.
The fair value of these derivatives was negative by
€59 million
at December 31, 2004, (negative by
€51 million
in 2003). Assuming a 10% depreciation of the euro against all
the other currencies to which we
182
have exchange rate exposure, the fair value of these financial
instruments, including long-term debt exposed to foreign
exchange risk, would have increased by
€57 million
in 2004 (as compared to an increase of
€17 million
in 2003).
Interest rate risk
Our outstanding total medium-term and long-term debt at
December 31, 2004, amounted to
€21,606 million,
of which
€13,753 million,
or approximately 64% of the total, bore interest at floating
rates, principally based on Euribor, and
€7,853 million,
or 36%, bore interest at fixed rates.
To improve the mix of our fixed and floating rate exposures, we
have entered into interest rate hedging contracts, particularly
interest rate swaps, collars and swaptions. In interest rate
swaps, we agree with other parties to exchange, at specified
intervals, the difference between interest amounts calculated by
reference to the notional principal amount and the fixed or
floating interest rates that we have agreed with the other
parties. An interest rate collar is a combination of options
that enables us to lock our debt cost into a predetermined
interest rate range. We primarily use zero-cost collars that do
not require payment of an option premium. Through a swaption, we
acquire the option to enter into an interest rate swap at a
certain date in the future.
At December 31, 2004, we had entered into outstanding
interest rate derivatives with a notional amount of
€10,379 million
(€9,479 million
at December 31, 2003), of which
€9,632 million
were interest rate swaps
(€8,580 million
at December 31, 2003),
€687 million
were interest rate collars
(€873 million
at December 31, 2003), and
€60 million
were swaptions
(€26 million
at December 31, 2003). The fair value of these derivatives
was negative by
€420 million
at such date (negative by
€365 million
in 2003). You should read note 22 to our consolidated
financial statements for a further discussion of the fair value
of these derivatives. See also “Item 5. Operating and
Financial Review and Prospects — U.S. GAAP
Reconciliation — Critical Accounting Policies under
U.S. GAAP.”
With these contracts in place, we estimate that the portion of
our long-term debt at such date still exposed to interest rate
fluctuations, appropriately weighting the notional value of
interest rate collars, was approximately 41%.
Based on the results of our sensitivity analysis, at
December 31, 2004, a 10% decrease in interest rates would
have increased the net negative fair value of our portfolio of
financial instruments, including long term debt and interest
rate derivatives, by
€46 million
(€307 million
in 2003). However, we do not consider such an increase in the
net negative fair value to be a significant risk, because it
would affect earnings and cash flow only if we were to reacquire
all or a portion of these instruments on the open market prior
to their maturity.
We believe that our effective interest rate risk depends on the
likelihood that interest rates will increase. Because our
revenues are not directly linked to interest rates, our
principal interest rate risk is that a general rise in interest
rates will result in a higher interest expense on the unhedged
portion of our floating-rate debt. If interest rates were to
increase by 10% over December 31, 2004 levels, our
consolidated interest expense, including with respect to long
term debt and interest rate derivatives, would increase by a
total of approximately
€20 million
per year
(€23 million
in 2003). Such amount is the net result of the impact of the
increase in interest charges on the floating rate portion of our
outstanding long term debt, partially offset by positive flows
deriving from our hedging contracts.
Commodity price risk
Beginning in 2000, we adopted a systematic approach to cover
commodity pricing and currency risk linked to the reimbursement
mechanism which was in place until the start of operations of
the Italian power exchange. Enel Trade entered into derivatives
contracts on commodities in order to fix part of the difference
between our costs and the related contribution we received
through tariffs, as well as to manage other risks related to the
purchase of commodities for our trading and gas sale activities.
Since the start of operations of the Italian power exchange, we
have been exposed to electricity price risk resulting from the
fact that prices are determined through competitive bidding by
market participants. In 2004, to reduce such risks we entered
into fixed price bilateral contracts with counterparties outside
of the Italian power exchange and into contracts for differences
with the Single Buyer, as explained in more detail below. We
also hedge price risk with respect to electricity not covered by
these contracts and to fuel that we purchase for generation
activities and gas that
183
we purchase and sell for trading activities, through the use of
hedging instruments. Finally, in 2004, Enel entered into
contracts with the Gestore della Rete in order to hedge risks of
the application of congestion fees in the event of market
congestion. As a result, our overall volume of contracts to
hedge commodity price risks at December 31, 2004,
(particularly swaps on petroleum indexes) increased very
significantly as compared to December 31, 2003, when the
uncertainty as to the actual starting date of the operation of
the Italian power exchange was reflected in reduced hedging
activity at that date.
Positive or negative changes in the fair value of our derivative
commodities contracts result from an increase or decrease in the
price of the underlying commodities, and are offset by opposite
negative or positive changes in the fair value of our
revenues-cost margin.
Based on the results of our sensitivity analysis, at
December 31, 2004, a 10% increase in commodity price levels
would have caused an increase in the fair value of our
derivative contracts of
€3.8 million
(€5.4 million
in 2003), while a 10% decrease would have caused a concomitant
decrease of
€3.8 million
(€5.4 million
in 2003).
In 2004, we entered into derivatives contracts on commodities in
order to hedge our exposure to electricity prices and the price
of fuel we use in generation activities with respect to the
amount of energy we sell on the Italian power exchange and for
which we do not enter into either contracts for differences with
the Single Buyer, or bilateral contracts in which the price is
indexed to changes in fuel prices. We believe that changes in
the fair value of these derivative commodities contracts are
generally offset by opposite negative or positive changes in the
fair value of our revenues-cost margin. This will occur
primarily to the extent prices on the Italian power exchange
rise or decline in close relation to rises or declines in prices
of fuels, which we expect will continue until significant
volumes of electricity generated at generation costs lower than
current
184
average generation costs in Italy shall be available as a result
of increased imports and/or the construction of new plants in
Italy.
In 2004, we entered into contracts for differences with the
Single Buyer. Please see “Item 4. Information on the
Company — Regulatory Matters — Electricity
Regulation — The Single Buyer” for a description
of these contracts. The notional value of such contracts as of
December 31, 2004, was
€3,152 million,
if calculated on the basis of the hours of activation under each
contract per year estimated by the Single Buyer and the average
monthly tariff per hour in 2004, or
€5,133 million,
if calculated on the basis of the maximum possible number of
hours of activation under each contract in one year (8,760) and
the average monthly tariff per hour in 2004.
Finally, in 2004, Enel entered into contracts with the Gestore
della Rete with a notional value of
€118 million
in order to hedge risks of the application of congestion fees in
the event of market congestion. Please see “Item 4.
Information on the Company — Regulatory
Matters — Electricity Regulation — The
Italian Power Exchange” for additional information on
market congestion and congestion fees.
In accordance with our accounting policies, we do not account
for commodity contracts at fair value for Italian GAAP purposes.
For additional detail on the volume of such contracts, please
see “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and
Prospects — Contractual Obligations and
Commitments.”
We believe that we are not exposed to significant counterparty
risk, or the risk of potential losses that may arise from the
non-fulfillment of contractual obligations by individual
counterparties of our hedging instruments, given the high credit
ratings of our counterparties.
ITEM 12.
DESCRIPTION OF SECURITIES OTHER THAN EQUITY SECURITIES
Not applicable.
PART II
ITEM 13.
DEFAULTS, DIVIDENDS AVERAGES AND DELINQUENCIES
None.
ITEM 14.
MATERIAL MODIFICATIONS TO THE RIGHTS OF SECURITY HOLDERS AND
PROCEEDS
Not applicable.
ITEM 15.
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Enel carried out an evaluation under the supervision and with
the participation of its management, including its then-chief
executive officer and its chief financial officer, of the
effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s
disclosure controls and procedures, as of December 31,2004. There are inherent limitations to the effectiveness of any
system of disclosure controls and procedures, including the
possibility of human error and the circumvention or overriding
of the controls and procedures. Accordingly, even effective
disclosure controls and procedures can only provide reasonable
assurance of achieving their control objectives. Based upon
Enel’s evaluation, the Company’s chief executive
officer at the time and the chief financial officer concluded
that the disclosure controls and procedures as of
December 31, 2004, were effective to provide reasonable
assurance that information required to be disclosed in the
reports Enel files and submits under the Exchange Act, is
recorded, processed, summarized and reported as and when
required. There was no change in the Company’s internal
control over financial reporting during 2004 that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,
Enel’s internal control over financial reporting.
ITEM 16.
[RESERVED]
ITEM 16A.
AUDIT COMMITTEE FINANCIAL EXPERT
Enel intends to qualify for the exemption under Rule 10A-3
under the Exchange Act from certain of the audit committee
requirements under the rule for foreign private issuers with a
board of statutory auditors established in accordance with local
law or listing requirements and meeting specified requirements
when
185
these requirements take effect on July 31, 2005. See
“Item 10. Other
Information — By-Laws — Significant
Differences in Corporate Governance Practices for Purposes of
Section 303A.11 of the NYSE Listed Company
Manual — Audit Committee and Internal Audit
Function.” Each of the members of Enel’s board of
statutory auditors is currently a registered chartered
accountant with at least three years’ prior experience as a
statutory auditor; we therefore believe that each is an
“audit committee financial expert” as defined in
Item 16A of Form 20-F. For the names of the members of
the board of statutory auditors, please see “Item 6.
Directors, Senior Management and
Employees — Board of Statutory Auditors.”
ITEM 16B.
CODE OF ETHICS
The Company has adopted a broad code of ethical conduct
applicable to all of its directors, employees and others acting
on its behalf. In addition to this code of ethical conduct, the
Company adopted a specific code of ethics, as defined in
Item 16B of Form 20-F under the Exchange Act, as
amended, that is applicable to the Company’s chief
executive officer, chief financial officer, chief accounting
officer, controller and persons performing similar functions to
any of the foregoing. This code of ethics is incorporated by
reference as Exhibit 4.1 hereto. If the Company amends the
provisions of this code of ethics that applies to its chief
executive officer, chief financial officer, chief accounting
officer, controller and persons performing similar functions, or
if the Company grants any waiver of such provisions, it will
timely disclose such amendment or waiver through a special
Form 6-K.
ITEM 16C.
PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
Audit and Non-Audit Fees
The following table sets forth the fees billed to the Company by
its independent auditors, KPMG S.p.A., with respect to the
fiscal years ended December 31, 2003 and 2004, which do not
include VAT and expenses:
Audit fees in the above table are the aggregate fees billed by
KPMG S.p.A. in connection with the audit of the Company’s
annual and interim financial statements and the Company’s
annual sustainability financial statements.
Audit-related fees in the above table are the aggregate fees
billed by KPMG S.p.A. for procedures performed in connection
with the issuance of debt securities and due diligence relating
to acquisitions, dispositions and other contemplated
transactions.
Audit Committee Pre-Approval Policies and
Procedures
Enel’s shareholders are responsible for the appointment of
the independent auditors for the performance of the annual
statutory audit, as required by Italian law, on the proposal of
the board of directors. In accordance with Italian law,
Enel’s board of statutory auditors is required to make a
recommendation to the shareholders with respect to the board of
directors’ proposal prior to the shareholder vote.
In June 2003, Enel’s board of directors approved a
corporate compliance code requiring among other things that
management not engage the independent auditors to perform any
audit-related service without first obtaining the express
approval of the internal control committee. Proposals to engage
the independent auditors to perform non-audit services, if any,
must be approved by Enel’s board of directors on a
case-by-case basis. In 2004, the board of directors did not
approve any such engagement.
186
ITEM 16D.
EXEMPTIONS FROM THE LISTING STANDARDS FOR AUDIT COMMITTEES
Not applicable.
ITEM 16E.
PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES BY THE ISSUER AND AFFILIATED
PURCHASERS
Neither Enel nor any affiliated purchaser purchased Enel’s
ordinary shares during 2004.
PART III
ITEM 17.
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Not applicable.
187
ITEM 18.
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and
Exchange Commission, Enel has filed certain agreements as
exhibits to this Annual Report on Form 20-F. These agreements
have been included to provide investors with information
regarding their terms and are not intended to provide any other
factual information about Enel or its subsidiaries. These
agreements may contain representations and warranties by the
parties that have been made solely for the benefit of the other
party or parties to such agreements, and such representations
and warranties (i) may be intended not as statements of
fact, but rather as a way of allocating the risk to one of the
parties to such agreements if those statements turn out to be
inaccurate, (ii) may have been qualified by disclosures
that were made to such other party or parties and that either
have been reflected in the company’s filings or are not
required to be disclosed in those filings, (iii) may apply
materiality standards different from what may be viewed as
material to investors and (iv) were made only as of the
date of such agreements or such other date(s) as may be
specified in such agreements and are subject to more recent
developments. Accordingly, these representations and warranties
may not describe the actual state of affairs of Enel or its
subsidiaries at the date hereof.
2.1 Deposit Agreement, as amended, among Enel S.p.A. and
Citibank N.A., as Depositary, and the owners of American
Depositary Receipts (incorporated by reference to the
Registrant’s Registration Statement (File
No. 333-6868) on Form F-6 effective as of
October 29, 1999 and the Post-effective Amendment
No. 1 to Form F-6 effective as of July 9, 2001).
4.1 Share Sale and Purchase Agreement between Weather
Investments II S.a.r.l., as Purchaser, and Enel Investment
Holding BV, as Seller, and Enel S.P.A., in relation to
certain undertakings, and Mr. Naguib Sawiris and
Os Holding and April Holding and Weather
Investments S.r.l. in respect of No. 91,681,074 shares
of Wind Telecomunicazioni S.p.A., entered into on
May 26, 2005.
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Shareholders of
ENEL S.p.A.
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of
ENEL S.p.A. (an Italian corporation) and subsidiaries (the
“Company”) as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and
the related consolidated statements of income, changes in
shareholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the years
in the three-year period ended December 31, 2004. These
consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the
Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our
audits. We did not audit the consolidated financial statements
of the subsidiary Wind Telecomunicazioni S.p.A. and its
consolidated subsidiaries (“Wind”), which statements
reflect total consolidated assets constituting 13% and 14% of
the related consolidated totals as of December 31, 2004 and
2003 respectively, and total consolidated revenues constituting
13%, 14% and 12% of the related consolidated totals for each of
the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2004.
Those statements were audited by other auditors whose report has
been furnished to us, and our opinion, insofar as it relates to
the amounts included for Wind, is based solely on the report of
the other auditors.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audits, and the
report of the other auditors, provide a reasonable basis for our
opinion.
In our opinion, based on our audits and the report of the other
auditors, the consolidated financial statements referred to
above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial
position of ENEL S.p.A. and subsidiaries as of December 31,2004 and 2003, and the results of their operations and their
cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended
December 31, 2004, in conformity with generally accepted
accounting principles in Italy.
Accounting principles generally accepted in Italy vary in
certain significant respects from accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America. Information
relating to the nature and effect of such differences is
presented in Notes 24, 25 and 26 to the consolidated
financial statements.
Utility plant, including construction in progress (Notes 2
and 6)
86,616
85,731
117,261
Accumulated depreciation (Notes 2 and 6)
(50,157
)
(48,576
)
(67,903
)
36,459
37,155
49,358
Other non-current assets:
Intangible assets (Notes 2 and 7)
11,534
13,576
15,615
Investments (Notes 2 and 8)
302
335
409
Deferred tax assets (Note 12)
1,257
1,532
1,702
Other (Note 9)
1,876
1,812
2,539
14,969
17,255
20,265
Total Assets
68,330
68,930
92,505
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Current maturities of long-term debt (Note 10)
1,365
4,011
1,848
Short term debt (Note 10)
5,054
4,632
6,842
Trade accounts payable
6,554
5,602
8,873
Taxes payable
339
1,511
459
Advances from customers
2,955
3,075
4,000
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities
4,320
4,077
5,849
20,587
22,908
27,871
Long-term debt (Note 10)
20,241
18,005
27,402
Other non-current liabilities:
Reserves for pensions and similar obligations (Note 11)
471
462
637
Reserves for employee termination indemnities
1,095
1,298
1,482
Deferred income taxes (Note 12)
2,883
2,515
3,903
Other (Notes 13 and 22)
3,206
2,618
4,340
7,655
6,893
10,362
Shareholders’ equity (Note 14):
Share capital, euro 1 par value per share (6,103,521,864
and 6,063,075,189 shares authorized, issued and outstanding
as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively)
6,104
6,063
8,264
Additional paid in capital
200
—
271
Legal reserve
1,453
1,453
1,967
Law 292/93 reserve
2,215
2,215
2,999
Retained earnings
9,183
8,884
12,432
Net income, net of interim dividends paid in 2004 of euro
2,014 million
692
2,509
937
19,847
21,124
26,870
Total Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity
68,330
68,930
92,505
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
ENEL S.p.A. (the “Parent”) and its subsidiaries (the
“Subsidiaries” or the “Subsidiary
Companies”), (collectively the “Company” or
“ENEL”) are involved in the generation, transmission,
distribution and sale of electricity, providing the majority of
the electric service in Italy. Gas distribution and sale, fuel
trading, engineering and contracting represent the other
principal activities of ENEL. International operations are
mainly represented by the generation and distribution of
electricity in Spain. ENEL, through Wind Telecomunicazioni
S.p.A. (“WIND”), also provides mobile and fixed
telecommunications and internet services.
The Parent is the successor entity to Ente Nazionale per
l’Energia Elettrica, which was established as a public
statutory body by the Italian Parliament in 1962 when the
Treasury Ministry nationalized approximately 1,250 private
electric companies. In July 1992, the public statutory body was
converted into a joint stock company in accordance with Law
No. 359 of August 8, 1992, which provided for the
privatization of ENEL.
ENEL’s privatization was launched in 1999 when a total of
3,848,802,000 ENEL’s ordinary shares (1,924,401,000 taking
into account the reverse stock split made in 2001) representing
31.74% of its capital stock, were placed on the market, with the
net proceeds going to the Italian Ministry of Economy and
Finance (the “MEF”) and its predecessor the Ministry
of Treasury of the Republic of Italy. At December 31, 2003,
50.63% of the share capital of the Parent Company is owned by
the MEF and 10.35% is owned by Cassa Depositi e Prestiti SpA, a
company controlled by the MEF. In 2004, the MEF sold
approximately 19% of its capital stock of the Parent Company
through a public offering, therefore reducing its interest to
31.45% of the share capital of the Parent Company at
December 31, 2004. An additional 10.28% is owned by Cassa
Depositi e Prestiti SpA, a company controlled by the MEF.
In July 2000, the Company, which owned a 51% interest in WIND,
acquired an additional interest, thus raising ENEL’s
interest to 56.63%.
On March 29, 2001, ENEL, through its wholly owned
subsidiary Enel Investment Holding BV, purchased 100% of the
share capital of Infostrada S.p.A. (fixed line
telecommunications operator in Italy). The acquisition was
treated as a purchase, with resulting goodwill, considering also
the ancillary costs, of euro 7,632 million, which is
being amortized over 15 years (see Note 7).
On July 30, 2001, Enel Investment Holding BV contributed
its 100% interest in Infostrada S.p.A. to WIND against receipt
of shares of WIND corresponding to 38.7% of the share capital of
WIND, after the stock issuance, increasing ENEL’s share to
73.42%. For consolidation purposes, this transaction was treated
as a reorganization under common control, and accordingly the
assets and liabilities transferred were accounted for at their
carrying values.
On March 20, 2003, ENEL reached an agreement for the
acquisition of the 26.6% share in WIND’s capital stock held
by the France Telecom Group, thus achieving full ownership of
WIND. The purchase price for the acquisition amounts to
euro 1,330 million. In addition to the purchase price
the seller was reimbursed euro 59 million of capital
contribution made to WIND. The transfer of the shares and the
payment of the price agreed, in addition to the assumption by
ENEL of the euro 175 million subordinated loan, took
place on July 1, 2003. The acquisition was treated as a
purchase, with resulting goodwill, of
euro 1,411 million which is being amortized over
15 years which is the residual duration of the concession.
In January 2002, the Company purchased 100% of the share capital
of Electra de Viesgo SL (Viesgo), the holding company of the
Viesgo Group, the fourth largest electricity operator in Spain,
for euro 1,920 million. Following the restructuring of
Electra de Viesgo SL and its subsidiaries, at the end of 2002,
activities in power generation and distribution of electricity
were contributed to Viesgo Generacion SL and Electra de Viesgo
Distribucion SL, respectively. The former is controlled by Enel
Produzione SpA while the latter is controlled by Enel
Distribuzione SpA. The acquisition was accounted for as a
purchase, with resulting goodwill of euro 757 million,
which is being amortized over 20 years.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS — (Continued)
On May 31, 2002, the Company sold 100% of the share capital
of Eurogen S.p.A. to Edipower S.p.A., a consortium led by Edison
SpA, for euro 2,980 million. The gain from the
disposal of euro 2,313 million was recorded as
extraordinary income in the Consolidated Financial Statements
for the year ended December 31, 2002. Effective
May 31, 2002, Eurogen has been deconsolidated.
On January 29, 2003, the Company sold 100% of the share
capital of Interpower S.p.A. to the Energia
Italiana-ACEA-Electrabel consortium for euro 532 million.
The gain from the disposal was euro 356 million and
was recorded as extraordinary income in the Consolidated
Financial Statements for the year ended December 31, 2003.
Effective January 1, 2003 Interpower has been
deconsolidated.
On March 5, 2003, Enel Produzione acquired for
euro 75.7 million a 60% share in the capital stock of
Dutch company Entergy Power Holding Maritza BV (Maritza), which
in turn controls 73% of the Bulgarian company Maritza
East III Power Company AD. The latter will carry out the
refurbishment and environmental upgrade of a lignite-fired
generation plant located in Bulgaria on the border with Greece
(in the Stara Zagora Region), and will subsequently manage the
plant. ENEL holds a call option on 40% of the capital stock of
Maritza. The acquisition was accounted for as a purchase, with
resulting goodwill of euro 16 million, which is being
amortized over 20 years (see Note 7). Effective
April 1, 2003 these companies have been consolidated.
On June 16, 2003, ENEL and Uniòn Fenosa signed an
agreement for the acquisition by ENEL of 80% of Uniòn
Fenosa Energìas Especiales, a company that groups the
activities of the Spanish operator in the field of renewable
resources. The price agreed for the purchase of Uniòn
Fenosa Energìas Especiales is euro 178 million,
while Uniòn Fenosa holds a call option, expiring at the end
of 2007, on 30% of the shares. The transaction was concluded in
December 2003 and was effective December 31, 2003.
Uniòn Fenosa Energìas Especiales has been consolidated
as of December 31, 2003 (balance-sheet only). In 2004,
Uniòn Fenosa Energìas Especiales changed its name to
Enel Union Fenosa Renovables (EUFR).
The Bersani Decree requires that a local distribution company
owned or jointly owned by a municipality that serves at least
20% of the electricity customers of a municipality may request
the Company to sell to them its distribution assets in that
municipality at a price to be determined by agreement between
ENEL and that relevant local distribution company. Under this
requirement, in October 2002 and November 2002, distribution
networks based in the municipalities of Milan and Verona were
sold for euro 424 million and
euro 108 million, respectively. In November 2003, the
distribution network based in the municipality of Brescia was
sold for euro 168 million. In 2004, certain minor
distribution networks were sold for euro 13 million. In
addition, on December 21, 2004, the Company signed a
preliminary agreement with Società Elettrica Provincia
Autonoma di Trento (SET) for the sale of the
distribution network based in the municipality of Trento for
euro 198 million. The aggregate gains from the sales
of local distribution networks related to the compliance with
the Bersani Decree of euro 11 million for the year ended
December 31, 2004, euro 120 million for the year
ended December 31, 2003, euro 459 million for the
year ended December 31, 2002 were recorded as extraordinary
income in the respective consolidated statements of income.
In 2001, the Company began to consolidate several companies
active in the distribution and sale of gas to the regulated
market. In May 2002, the Company purchased 98.81% of the share
capital of Camuzzi Gazometri SpA, the second largest distributor
of natural gas in Italy, for euro 1,045 million. The
acquisition was accounted for as a purchase, with resulting
goodwill of euro 597 million, which is being amortized over
15 years (see Note 7). Camuzzi Gazometri SpA (now
renamed Enel Rete Gas S.p.A.) and its subsidiaries have been
consolidated effective July 1, 2002. In 2002, the Company
purchased a number of minor gas distributors, which at the end
of the year were merged into GE.AD SpA.
In 2004, the Company purchased Ottogas Group, Sicilmetano Group
and Italgestioni Group, all active in the distribution and sale
of gas for a total of euro 104 million. These
acquisitions were accounted for as purchases, with resulting
goodwill of euro 29 million, which is being amortized
over 15 years (see Note 7).
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS — (Continued)
On June 23, 2004, the Company completed the Initial Public
Offering (IPO) of 50% of the share capital of Terna, its
subsidiary constituting the Transmission Division, however,
maintaining control of Terna. Under the terms of the IPO,
1,000,000 shares have been sold to financial institutions
and to the public at euro 1.70 per share. The gross
proceeds resulting from the sale are approximately
euro 1.7 billion and resulted in a net gain of euro
808 million. As of and for the year ended December 31,2004, Terna is consolidated and minority interest is reflected
in the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Certain amounts reported in previous year have been reclassified
to conform to the 2004 presentation. Amounts previously
classified as construction work in progress and advance payments
are included as utility plant and amounts related to deferred
tax assets, previously classified as other receivables and other
non-current assets are included as deferred tax assets, divided
into current and non-current assets.
(2)
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING AND REPORTING POLICIES
Basis of Presentation
The Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements are
prepared from the accounts of the Parent and those of the
Company’s subsidiaries (whether directly or indirectly
controlled), in accordance with accounting principles prescribed
by Italian law and supplemented by the accounting principles
issued by the Consiglio Nazionale dei Dottori Commercialisti e
dei Ragionieri (“Italian GAAP”). The financial
statements have been reformatted from the original Italian
consolidated financial statement presentation and include
certain financial statement reclassifications and additional
disclosures in order to conform more closely with the form and
content of financial statements required by the United States
Securities and Exchange Commission.
Differences between the Company’s accounting principles and
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States
(“U.S. GAAP”) and their effects on consolidated
shareholders’ equity as of December 31, 2004 and 2003
and on consolidated net income for each of the years in the
three year period ended December 31, 2004, are described in
Notes 24, 25 and 26.
The Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements are
presented in euro. The translations of the euro amounts into
U.S. Dollars (“USD”) at the rate of USD 1.3538 to
1 euro are included solely for the convenience of the reader,
using the noon buying rate in New York City for cable transfers
in euro, as certified for customs purposes by the Federal
Reserve Bank of New York on December 31, 2004. The
convenience translations should not be construed as
representations that the euro amounts have been, could have
been, or could in the future be, converted into USD at this or
any other rate of exchange.
On April 1, 2004, the Italian power exchange came into
operation pursuant to the article 5, comma 2 of the
Bersani Decree. In conjunction with the establishment of the
Italian power exchange, the Ministry of Productive Activities
issued a Decree that assigns to the Single Buyer, a state-owned
entity, the responsibility and the authority over the supply of
electricity to non-eligible customers. From the same date, the
Single Buyer acts as an intermediary of the electricity market
by acquiring from generation companies and selling to
distribution companies all the electricity destined to
non-eligible customers. As a consequence, ENEL’s
electricity sales to and purchases from third parties are
presented gross, as compared to previous years where
intercompany transactions related to the sales and purchases of
electricity for the regulated market were eliminated in
consolidation. Sales to the Single Buyer and to the Market
Operator were euro 1,824 million and
euro 3,079 million, respectively. Purchases from the
Single Buyer and from the Market Operator were
euro 7,183 million and euro 480 million,
respectively (see Note 14).
Consolidation Principles
The Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements include the
Parent’s statutory accounts and the accounts of companies
controlled by ENEL S.p.A., directly or indirectly, either by
holding the majority of the voting rights or sufficient votes to
enable it to exercise control at ordinary shareholders’
meetings. Control is defined as the ability to govern the
financial and operating policies of the enterprise so as to
obtain benefits
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS — (Continued)
from the activities. Controlled companies are consolidated or
deconsolidated as of the effective date control is acquired or
lost, as determined by the respective purchase or sale contract.
Starting from 2004, no adjustment was made to eliminate the
effect of tax-related entries since consolidated companies,
where applicable, recorded in their respective financial
statements at December 31, 2004 the elimination of
tax-basis amounts pursuant to D. Legs January 17, 2003
n. 6 — Riforma organica della disciplina delle
società di capitali e società cooperative (c.d.
“Vietti Reform”). Adjustments are made on
consolidation to eliminate all significant intercompany balances
and transactions, including any unrealized gains and losses on
such transactions, net of applicable tax effects, if any.
Investments in un-consolidated entities, if material, are
accounted for under the equity method when the Company has a 20%
to 50% investment. Joint ventures in which the Group has a stake
are consolidated using the proportional method. Other
investments are recorded at cost and adjusted if a permanent
impairment in value is present.
In 2004, the entities included in the Consolidated Financial
Statements changed as compared to the prior year, mainly due to
the disposal of NewReal in July 2004 and the acquisition of
Sicilmetano Group in January 2004, Ottogas Group in September
2004 and Italgestioni Group in December 2004. Additional changes
in the scope of activity affecting the comparability of the
Consolidated Income Statement for 2004 over that of 2003, are
represented by the Maritza East III Power Company, a
generation company in Bulgaria, whose results for 2003 were
consolidated from April 1, 2003, and by Enel Uniòn
Fenosa Renovables (generation of electricity from renewable
resources in Spain) consolidated only in the Consolidated
Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2003 and fully
consolidated in 2004.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash equivalents consist of highly liquid temporary investments
with original maturities within three months. Cash and cash
equivalents are available on demand, with the exception of
euro 39 million at December 31, 2004 pledged as
collateral for transactions entered into by Enel North America
and Enel Latin America.
Receivables
Receivables are recorded at their expected realizable value.
Inventories
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market; cost is
determined on the basis of the weighted average purchase cost,
and primarily includes fuel stock and other materials.
Obsolete or slow moving inventories are written down to their
estimated realizable value.
Real estate properties available for sale are valued at the
lower of cost and current market value.
Contract work in progress is stated on the basis of the
contracted amounts due, if those amounts can be calculated with
reasonable certainty, on a percentage-of-completion method.
Accrued income and expenses
Accrued income and expenses are recorded based on the accrual
method. Issue discounts and other costs relating to financing
are recorded in the Consolidated Statements of Income over the
term of the loan or issue to which they relate.
Utility Plant
Utility plant is stated at cost, as adjusted by revaluations in
accordance with various Italian laws. Prior to 1989 interest
incurred directly related to investment was capitalized.
Starting from 1989, interest incurred directly related to
investment is expensed.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS — (Continued)
Revaluations prior to 1993 increased the consolidated and
statutory net book value of utility plant. Increases in utility
plant of the Parent were credited to retained earnings in the
statutory and Consolidated Financial Statements. Revaluations
that increased the net assets of Subsidiary Companies were
reflected as an increase in Retained Earnings in the
accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets.
The application of Law No. 292 of August 9, 1993
resulted in a restatement of the net book value of the
Parent’s utility plant in its statutory books to a
valuation based upon a projected economic return. Such
revaluation increased the gross book value of utility plant and
created a distributable reserve in the statutory accounts that
is reflected in the Law 292/93 Reserve in the accompanying
Consolidated Financial Statements. The application of Law
No. 292 did not result in a restatement of the net assets
of Subsidiary Companies.
The Italian 2004 Budget Law (Law no. 350 dated
December 24, 2003) has enabled the revaluation of assets
carried out in the statutory accounts of the main ENEL companies
resulting in a euro 41 million increase in the gross
book value of assets recorded in the Consolidated Financial
Statements as of December 31, 2003, of which
euro 14 million relates to land and buildings and
euro 27 million to plant and equipment. The
corresponding increase in ENEL’s Shareholders’ equity
amounts to euro 33 million, equal to the mentioned
revaluation, net of substitute tax payables, of
euro 8 million.
Costs directly associated with improvements are capitalized
while routine maintenance and repairs are expensed.
If management has evidence that there has been a permanent
impairment in the net book value of any specific asset, a
write-down is recorded accordingly. The Company assesses
potential impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances
indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be
recoverable. In making this assessment, the Company groups its
assets at the lowest level of identifiable cash flows that are
largely independent of the cash flows of other utility plant
assets. If it is determined that the fair value of the assets is
lower than the corresponding book value, an impairment change is
recorded for the difference. Such fair value is determined based
on the estimated future cash flows, on a discounted basis, to be
generated from the use of the asset. The original value of the
asset, net of depreciation, may be reinstated if the reasons for
such a write-down subsequently cease to exist.
Replaced or retired property is removed from the utility plant
accounts, together with the related accumulated depreciation.
Grants received to finance specific construction projects are
recognized once the legal right to such grants has been acquired
and their amount is reasonably determinable. These amounts are
amortized over the estimated economic useful life of the related
asset.
Depreciation
The Consolidated Financial Statements reflect the depreciation
of utility plant on a straight-line basis, using rates
reflecting the estimated economic useful life (“economic
depreciation”) of the related assets. Prior to 2004, in the
statutory financial statements of the Parent and Subsidiary
Companies, as permitted by Italian law, utility plant was
depreciated over prescribed tax lives (“fiscal
depreciation”) which was shorter than the economic useful
lives. The excess amount of depreciation in the statutory
accounts was eliminated in the Consolidated Financial Statements.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS — (Continued)
Depreciation expense is based on the following estimated
economic useful lives:
Average years
of estimated
economic
Plant categories
useful life
Buildings and associated land
40
Generating plant:
Hydroelectric
40
Thermal
20
Geothermal
12
Other renewable sources
20
Transmission lines
40
(1)
Transformer stations
32-42
(2)
Medium and low voltage distribution lines
30-40
(3)
Telecommunications:
Mobile equipments
5-6
Fixed lines appliances
8
Cables
20
(1)
Average years estimated from January 1, 2003; previously
equal to 35 (Note 6).
(2)
Average years estimated from January 1, 2003; previously
equal to 20 (Note 6).
(3)
Average years estimated from January 1, 2004; previously
equal to 18-20 (Note 6).
The above rates are reduced by half for assets acquired during
the year, since the depreciation charge which results is
immaterially different from that determined by using the date
when the asset is ready for use.
Intangible Assets
Intangible assets are recorded following the same criteria
adopted for tangible assets. They include the non-amortized
balance of investments which have an economic life of several
years. For acquired intangible assets, including goodwill,
amortization is calculated on a straight-line basis over five
years or a different period if deemed to be more representative
of the expected economic useful life of the assets.
In case of permanent impairment in value, the cost is written
down accordingly and restored, net of amortization, if the
reasons for such write-down subsequently cease to exist. In
particular, the carrying value of goodwill is annually subject
to impairment test.
The extraordinary contribution due upon the suppression of the
electricity industry pension fund, pursuant to Law 488,
December 23, 1999 (the 2000 Budget Law), has also been
recorded under intangible assets. This balance is amortized over
a period of 20 years, as also permitted under Italian Law
(see Note 7).
Investments
Investments in unconsolidated subsidiaries, excluded from
consolidation as not significant, are carried at acquisition or
underwriting cost, adjusted where necessary for permanent
impairment in value. In case of a recovery, the original value
of the investments is restored, and the adjustment is recorded
in the Consolidated Statements of Income as a revaluation.
Investments in affiliates are accounted for under the equity
method, except for investments in certain consortium and other
companies, whose total value is not significant, that are
carried at acquisition or underwriting cost.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS — (Continued)
Investments in other companies included among investments, if
public, are stated at the lower of acquisition cost and market
value. If not public, the investments are recorded at the lower
of cost or expected realizable value.
Payables
Payables are stated at face value.
Reserve for Employee Termination Indemnities and Other
Employee Benefits
The Company’s Italian based employees are eligible for
severance pay pursuant to Italian law. The Company accrues a
reserve for such employee termination liabilities, net of
applicable advances, over the employees’ service periods.
The Company also contributes to a management retirement plan
that pays pension benefits, in accordance with Italian law and
by agreements with the trade unions, to managers who retired
prior to April 1, 1998. With the establishment of the
FONDENEL Fund, the liabilities related to managers employed as
of April 1, 1998 were transferred to the FONDENEL Fund. The
FONDENEL Fund is managed externally and is subject to the
regulations governed by Decree No. 14 on April 21,1993. In the last quarter of 2000, the Company reached an
agreement with the majority of the participants in the
management retirement plan for an early payment of the provision.
Accordingly, the pension benefits liability as of
December 31, 2004 and 2003 relates solely to those
individuals who had retired prior to April 1, 1998 and did
not agree to the early payment in the last quarter of 2000. The
reserve also includes amounts to be paid to existing employees
who have worked 35 years with the Company, in accordance
with the collective labor contract and current union agreements.
In addition, ENEL makes contributions to certain employee
associations that provide medical and various other employee
benefits to both current and retired employees. These plans are
not administered by ENEL and contributions are determined in
accordance with the provisions of negotiated contracts with the
trade unions. ENEL expenses its contributions to these plans as
incurred. Such amounts totalled euro 75 million,
euro 90 million and euro 79 million for the
years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively.
The Company grants, under existing contractual obligations, to
its employees hired prior to July 1, 1996 (working, retired
or to their surviving spouses), an 80% reduction on electricity
tariffs (excluding taxes and duties) within certain consumption
limits per year. These discounts are presented as a reduction in
operating revenues in the accompanying Consolidated Statements
of Income.
Employees of Viesgo are also entitled to certain benefits,
including a reduction of electricity tariffs and medical care.
In March 1999, the Company and the managers’ union signed
an agreement which replaced the managers’ benefit of
discounted electricity tariff rates with a monthly bonus paid
during their working life and a one-time bonus paid at their
retirement date.
Other provisions for risks and charges
Other provisions for risks and charges are accrued against known
or probable losses and charges, the amount and timing of which
are undetermined at the balance sheet date. Accruals are
calculated on the basis of the best estimate made according to
information available.
Operating Revenues
Revenues from the sale of electricity to the Italian power
exchange are recorded on the basis of the electricity provided
at prices established by the bidding mechanism.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS — (Continued)
Revenues from the sale and transport of electricity and gas to
end users relate to volume supplied in the period. These
revenues are recorded when the customer is billed or the meter
is read and are integrated with appropriate consumption
estimates of revenues from the supply of electricity provided
after the last meter reading prior to year end. Calculations are
based, where applicable, on law provisions and tariffs
established by the Italian Authority for Electricity and Gas
(the “Authority”) or other similar foreign
institutions, applicable for the year.
As a result of a governmental law passed in 1986, which was
aimed at providing funds for ENEL to offset the cost of building
the Italian electricity infrastructure and other costs of
connecting new buildings to the electricity distribution
network, customers requiring a new connection are obliged to pay
a connection fee to the Company. Starting from 2002, fixed
connections fees are no longer correlated to the mentioned
capital expenditure due to the new technological environment and
due to the different nature of such investments, increasingly
oriented towards improvements in the quality of service and the
safeguard of the environment. Consequently, connection fees are
recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Income when billed
to the customer.
Revenues for the telecommunications sector from traffic,
interconnections and roaming are recorded according to the usage
by customers and telephone operators calculated on an accrual
basis. Such revenues include the amount relating to the access
to and use of the Company’s network by customers and other
domestic and international telephone operators. Revenues from
the sale of rechargeable telephone cards and recharging are
recorded solely for the amount corresponding to prepaid traffic
effectively used by customers during the year. Revenues from the
sale of mobile and fixed telephones and related accessories are
recorded at the time of the transfer of ownership.
Revenues from other services and the sale of goods are
recognized when the service is provided or the title of
ownership of the goods is transferred.
Grants
Grants related to assets are recorded when legal title to the
grant is recognized and when its amount may be determined with
reasonable certainty and is free from constraints. Grants for
the purchase of specific plant and equipment are recorded as a
reduction in the cost of the asset or, in the absence of such
correlation, are deferred and recorded in the Consolidated
Statements of Income over the depreciable life of the assets to
which they relate.
Other grants, including the amounts received from the
Equalization Fund, are recorded in the Consolidated Statement of
Income when legal title to the grant is recognized and when its
amount may be determined with reasonable certainty and is free
from constraints.
Statements of Cash Flows
The consolidated statements of cash flows are prepared using the
indirect method and are in accordance with International
Accounting Standard No. 7, issued by the International
Accounting Standards Board, as well as Italian GAAP.
The payment in 2002 of the extraordinary contribution for the
elimination of the electricity industry pension fund is included
in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows as financing
activities.
Vacation Pay
Vacation pay for Italian based employees is provided in
accordance with Italian law. The related liabilities were
euro 81 million and euro 89 million as of
December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively, and are included
in “Accrued expenses and other current liabilities” in
the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS — (Continued)
Income Taxes
Income taxes are recorded in tax payables, net of advances based
on the expected taxable income as provided by law, taking into
consideration applicable exemptions and tax credits, and the
effect of the new Testo Unico income tax regulation, based on
“tax consolidation” procedure, which ENEL elected
pursuant the formalization of Group Regulations.
The following two income taxes are payable by Italian companies:
•
IRES (corporate income tax, formerly IRPEG), payable at 33%, 34%
and 36% for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and
2002, respectively.
•
IRAP (regional income tax), payable at a tax rate of 4.25% for
the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002. From
January 1, 2003, each Italian region may determine its own
tax rate leading to an aggregate rate which must fall between
3.259% and 5.259%.
The tax base for IRAP differs significantly from that for IRES.
In particular, employee related costs and net interest expense
are not deductible for IRAP purposes.
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for
differences between the financial reporting and tax bases of
assets and liabilities at each reporting period end. Certain
reserves within shareholders’ equity, totalling
euro 2,657 million as of December 31, 2004 and
2003, respectively, are subject to taxation upon utilization.
Deferred tax liabilities on such reserves are provided to the
extent that such taxation will result from expected future
distributions or other taxable events. Deferred tax assets,
including tax loss carry-forwards, are recognized when
management believes there is reasonable certainty of their
realization. Deferred tax liabilities are accrued when and to
the extent they are expected to be paid.
Research and Development
Research and Development costs are charged to operating expenses
as incurred. In 2002, research and development activities
primarily related to various studies involving technological
innovation, improvements to plant efficiency, reliability and
safety, environmental protection, service quality, and use of
energy resources. In 2003 and 2004, research and development
costs include only expenses related to improvements to plant
efficiency, reliability and safety, environmental protection,
service quality, and use of energy resources. Studies involving
technological innovation are carried out by the associate
company CESI, which was no longer consolidated as of January, 1
2003, but accounted for by the equity method.
Amounts charged to operating expenses were
euro 20 million, euro 16 million and
euro 100 million for the years ended December 31,2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively.
Foreign Currency
Transactions denominated in currencies other than the functional
currency are translated to the functional currency at the
exchange rate in effect on the date of the transaction. At the
balance sheet date, assets and liabilities denominated in
currencies different from the functional currency are translated
into the functional currency at the exchange rate at that date.
Foreign currency exchange gains and losses, both realized and
unrealized, are included in income in the period they arise.
The balance sheet of companies operating with a functional
currency other than euro are translated into euro at the
exchange rate applicable at the balance sheet date. Statement of
income items are translated into euro at average exchange rates
for the year. Differences arising from the translation into euro
of these statements are netted against retained earnings without
any effect on net income.
Financial Derivatives
With respect to interest rate, foreign exchange and price risks,
the Company enters into derivative transactions to hedge
specific transactions as well as general risks (see
Note 22).
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS — (Continued)
The interest differentials to be received or paid on interest
rate swaps, as well as interest differentials on interest rate
collars, are accrued over the life of the contract. The interest
differentials on forward rate agreements are charged to expenses
over the period hedged and are classified as financial income
(expense). Such interest rate differentials are recorded in
accrued income and prepayments or accrued expenses and other
current liabilities as applicable in the Consolidated Balance
Sheets.
Foreign exchange forward contracts are valued at the spot rate
at year-end and the related gains and losses are recorded as
financial income (expense). Costs for options are recognized at
the expiration date of the option. Premiums or discounts are
accrued over the life of the contract, and are also classified
as financial income (expense) in the Consolidated
Statements of Income. With reference to options, the premiums
paid are recorded in accrued income and prepayments until the
maturity of the contract.
The economic effects of currency and commodity risk hedging
contracts intended to hedge risks deriving from the current
tariff system are recorded in the consolidated statements of
income in line with those of transactions for which risks are
being hedged. If the economic effect of the hedged transaction
has not yet occurred, the corresponding economic effect relating
to the hedging instruments is deferred. Derivative contracts
originally entered into as hedging contracts for which the
underlying asset or liability is extinguished prior to
expiration or is not specifically identifiable, are valued at
the lower of cost or market value as of the balance sheet date
(interest rate derivatives) or are marked-to-market (foreign
exchange derivatives). The corresponding effect of the valuation
is recorded as financial income (expense) in the
consolidated statements of income.
Contracts for differences with the Single Buyer, entered into
through the auctions held in December 2004, are carried at cost
since a reference market for such contracts does not exist and
the cost is deemed to be representative of their fair value as
of December 31, 2004. The notional amount of such contracts
is recognized in the Off-balance sheet items.
Extraordinary Income and Expenses
The Company records items as extraordinary income and expenses
if they relate to gains or losses on activities which impact the
corporate structure of the Company (such as business
re-organization costs, merger and acquisition related costs and
gains or losses, write-downs due to reconversions and
replacement of plant and equipment due to new technologies);
extraordinary write-downs of fixed assets and related
restatement to original value when the reasons for asset
write-downs subsequently cease to exist; contingent assets or
liabilities from events or transactions that would not
reasonably be expected to recur in the foreseeable future, such
as theft or shortage, natural events or litigation related to
non-operating areas (e.g., mergers, acquisitions and
disposals) and items regarding previous fiscal years.
Environmental Costs
Environmental costs refer to the avoidance, reduction and
monitoring of the environmental impact of production activities.
Recurring environmental costs are recorded in the consolidated
statements of income in the year in which they are incurred ,
while costs relating to the extension of the useful life,
increase in capacity and improvement in the safety of tangible
assets are capitalized as part of the cost of the assets and
depreciated over the residual useful lives of the related assets.
(3)
REGULATION AND RATES
On April 1, 1999, Legislative Decree No. 79/1999 (the
“Bersani Decree”), implementing the principles
contained in the Electricity Directive issued in 1996 by the
European Union, became effective. The Bersani Decree has
commenced the transformation of the electricity sector from a
highly regulated industry to one where energy prices charged by
generators will be eventually determined by competitive bidding.
The Bersani Decree also mandates the consolidation of
electricity distribution activities in urban areas. It further
provides for a gradual liberalization of the electricity market
so that customers whose annual consumption of electricity
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS — (Continued)
exceeds specified amounts, together with distributors and
wholesalers (all defined as “Eligible Customers”) will
be able to contract freely with power generation companies to
buy electric power.
The Energy Authority has also replaced the “cost-plus”
system for tariffs with a new “price cap” tariff
methodology. Under the price-cap methodology, tariffs will be
reduced by a fixed percentage each year. This system creates
incentives for operators to improve efficiency and gradually
passes on savings to final customers.
The Bersani Decree establishes a general regulatory framework
for the Italian electricity industry that gradually introduces
free competition in power generation and sales to Eligible
Customers while maintaining a regulated monopoly structure for
power transmission, distribution and sales to Regulated market.
In particular, the Bersani Decree and subsequent implementing
regulations:
•
Liberalized, as of April 1, 1999, the generation, import
and export of electricity, as well as the sale of electricity to
Eligible Customers;
•
Provided that, after January 1, 2003, no electricity
company will be allowed to produce or import more than 50% of
the total of imported and domestically-produced electricity in
Italy, and, in connection with this limit, mandated the
Company’s sale of not less than 15,000 MW of its
generating capacity by January 1, 2003;
•
Provided that consumers, or Eligible Customers, meeting certain
consumption thresholds, which have been progressively reduced,
may negotiate supply agreements directly with any domestic or
foreign producer, wholesaler or distributor of electricity,
while other, “Non-Eligible Customers” must continue to
purchase electricity from the distributor serving the area in
which they are located and pay regulated prices determined by
the Energy Authority;
•
Provided for the establishment of the Single Buyer, a central
purchaser of electricity from producers on behalf of all
Non-eligible Customers;
•
Provided for the creation of the Borsa dell’Energia
Elettrica, (“Italian power exchange”) for electricity,
in which producers, importers, wholesalers, distributors, the
Gestore della Rete, other Eligible Customers and the Single
Buyer buy and sell electricity, with prices being determined
through a competitive bidding process;
•
Provided for the creation of the Gestore del Mercato,
(“Market Operator”), charged with managing the Italian
power exchange;
•
Provided for the separation of the management and operation of
the national electricity transmission grid, which was to be
licensed to an independent transmission system operator, the
Gestore della Rete, from the ownership of the grid assets, which
were retained by existing owners, primarily Terna; and
•
Established a new licensing regime for electricity distribution
and provided incentives for the consolidation of electricity
distribution networks within each municipality.
The Bersani Decree was amended following the enactment of a law
in October 2003 that provided, among other things, for the
reunification of management and operation of the national
transmission grid with its ownership under a single private
entity. A decree enacted in May 2004 provides for the transfer
from the Gestore della Rete to Terna of the responsibility to
manage the national transmission grid and the related assets by
October 31, 2005, although the Gestore della Rete will
still retain its other responsibilities. Following this
transfer, the Company will no longer control Terna, as no
electricity operator, including ENEL, shall be entitled to
voting rights in excess of 5% with respect to the appointment of
Terna’s directors. In addition, the Company is legally
required to reduce its holding in Terna to no more than 20% by
July 1, 2007. In February 2005, Terna and the Gestore della
Rete entered into an agreement for the transfer to Terna of
these management and operating activities. The transaction
remains subject to the approval of the Antitrust Authority.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS — (Continued)
On September 28, 2004, the Marzano Law (so named after the
then-Minister of Productive Activities, Antonio Marzano), a new
law aimed at reorganizing existing energy market regulation and
further liberalizing the natural gas and electricity markets,
took effect. Among other things, the Marzano Law aims to clarify
the respective roles of the Italian central government, regional
and local authorities, and the Energy Authority. The Marzano Law
also seeks to facilitate investments in the energy sector. To
further liberalize the market, and consistent with the new
Electricity Directive, the Marzano Law provides that all
customers will be eligible to purchase electricity on the free
market from July 1, 2007, although the law provides that
the Single Buyer will nonetheless continue to supply electricity
to consumers who choose not to leave the regulated market.
(4)
RECEIVABLES
Receivables primarily relate to amounts due for the supply of
electricity, gas and services, and also include amounts to be
billed for services rendered prior to year-end. The following
table shows a breakdown of receivables as of December 31,2004 and 2003.
2004
2003
(millions of euro)
Electricity, gas and services
7,005
5,995
Telecommunication services
1,054
1,335
Allowance for doubtful accounts
(362
)
(446
)
7,697
6,884
Tax receivables
851
948
Equalization Fund receivables (payables)
1,170
(71
)
Other
1,098
1,176
3,119
2,053
10,816
8,937
The increase in receivables for electricity, gas and services is
connected with the commencement of the operation of the Italian
power exchange, effective April 1, 2004, and of operations
of the Single Buyer, acting as intermediary between the
Group’s generation and distribution companies. As a result,
ENEL’s electricity sales to and purchases of electricity
from third parties increased considerably, also having an impact
on payables and a growth in revenues and costs.
Receivables are recorded net of the provision for doubtful
accounts amounting, at December 31, 2004, to
euro 362 million, against a beginning balance of
euro 446 million. The accrual for the year ended
December 31, 2004 recorded in the Consolidated Statement of
Income amounts to euro 241 million, while the
remainder of the change is due to uses and the impact of changes
in the scope of consolidation. The accrual for the year ended
December 31, 2003 recorded in the Consolidated Income
Statement amounts to euro 173 million, while the
remainder of the change is due to uses and the impact of changes
in the scope of consolidation. The accrual for the year ended
December 31, 2002 recorded in the Consolidated Statement of
Income amounts to euro 146 million, while the
remainder of the change is due to uses and the impact of changes
in the scope of consolidation.
The decline in receivables from the telecommunication business
results from an increase in the securitization program. In 2004,
WIND has continued the securitization program of its trade
receivables from regularly billed subscribers launched in 2002.
With the aim to improve the efficiency of the program, in March
2004, in the original framework of the securitization of
WIND’s trade receivables from regularly billed subscribers,
the program has been expanded to include certain trade
receivables from corporate clients. The face value of
receivables securitized at December 31, 2004, amounts to
euro 1,398 million (euro 1,213 million as of
December 31, 2003), of which euro 141 million
were not yet due as of December 31, 2004. Furthermore, in
the context of the securitization, Wind underwrote the
“units” (Class C and Class S Units) issued by
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS — (Continued)
French Investment Fund (FCC Eolo). The price paid for the units
is equal to the face value of the receivables securitized net of
a discount and is paid partly in cash and partly through the
underwriting of units by the seller, not traded in regulated
market. The value of the “units” is determined monthly
on the basis of the collection trend of the receivables
securitized. The risk of default borne by the seller, connected
with the credit standing of debtors, is limited to the value of
the said “units” and amounts, at the end of 2004, to
euro 105 million, recorded among “other
receivables”. The amount is net of the related provision
for doubtful accounts which equals euro 119 million as
of December 31, 2004 (euro 45 million as of
December 31, 2003).
The decrease in tax receivables is mainly due to less prepaid
taxes (decrease of euro 301 million), partially offset
by an increase in VAT receivables (increase of
euro 188 million).
Net receivables from the Electricity Equalization Fund at
December 31, 2004 include euro 1,682 million of
gross receivables offset by gross payables of
euro 512 million. Gross receivables substantially
relate to the reimbursement of euro 1,219 million of
stranded costs relating to the unrecoverable costs for
generation and natural gas imported from Nigeria incurred from
2000 through 2004, euro 248 million relating to the
effect of the equalization of costs for generating, transmitting
and distribution of electricity and euro 248 in prizes
awarded in 2004 by the Authority for the improvement in service
quality achieved by ENEL Distribuzione with respect to the years
2003 and 2004. The recognition of stranded costs resulted from
the issue of a Decree by the Ministry of Productive Activities
on August 6, 2004, which defined amounts, terms and
criteria for the reimbursement. Gross payables of
euro 512 million at December 31 2004 (euro
377 million at December 31, 2003) mainly refer to
euro 489 million collected by ENEL Group companies
from energy customers through certain tariff components which
are owed to the Electricity Equalization Fund.
Other receivables mainly include, in addition to the
euro 105 million related to the securitization of WIND
receivables, advances to suppliers, factoring receivables and
receivables from social security institutions.
The increase in fuel inventories is primarily due to the change
in the scope of consolidation due to the acquisitions of Ottogas
Group, Sicilmetano Group and Italgestioni Group.
The increase in materials, supplies and other inventories is
mainly due to an increase in expenditure related to the Networks
and Infrastructure Division. The increase has been offset by
sales of equipment originally intended for use in the
construction of thermal plants abroad, carried out by the
Engineering and Contracting sector.
Residential buildings available for sale decreased due to
disposals in the year.
The decrease in contract work in progress is primarily due to a
reduction in the development of activities in the engineering
and contracting sector for contract work acquired
internationally. The decrease is consistent with advances from
customers, recorded under current liabilities.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS — (Continued)
As of December 31, 2004 and 2003, utility plant includes
assets to be relinquished, primarily hydroelectric, with a net
book value of approximately euro 2,754 million and
euro 2,800 million, respectively. Italian law (Decree
79/99 applying European Commission Directive 92/62 regarding the
electricity market) established the expiration date for
concessions relating to large reservoirs managed and operated by
the Company. The concessions will expire thirty years after the
decree became effective, thus in 2029. Moreover, Law no. 340
dated November 24, 2000, extended to 2020 concessions
regarding State property used for thermal generation activities.
At such dates, all water catchment plant, control equipment,
high pressure pipes and drainage pipes must be transferred to
the State in good working order if the concession is not
renewed. This is achieved through annual maintenance activities.
Therefore, the depreciation of the assets to be relinquished has
been calculated on the basis of the lesser of the duration of
the concession or the residual useful lives of the assets.
The same decree also provides the possibility for the autonomous
provinces of Trento and Bolzano to choose a different expiration
date for hydroelectric concessions, currently in 2010.
The expiration of concessions for hydroelectric plants of the
Viesgo Group varies between 2032 and 2065.
The following reflects changes in utility plant (millions of
euro):
In 2004, the economic useful life of medium and low-voltage
distribution lines owned by Enel Distribuzione was reviewed. The
review extended the Italian distribution networks’ useful
life to approximately 30 to 40 years in line with
historical experience and international practice. The
application from January 1, 2004 of lower depreciation
rates for such assets resulted in an euro 518 million
reduction in ordinary depreciation as compared with 2003, which
was calculated on higher depreciation rates. Comparability with
the previous year is influenced by this change in estimate.
The economic depreciation rates used until 2002 for Terna’s
high voltage and very high voltage plants were determined in
1994 by a special ENEL working group. Recent diagnostic methods,
used in conjunction with sophisticated calculation tools, made
possible a more accurate determination of the plants’
technical condition. Therefore, effective January 1, 2003,
the economic depreciation rates were revised in order to better
reflect the estimated economic useful life of the facilities.
The analysis performed, based on specific factors such as
preventive maintenance and improved reliability of the
components, resulted in the extension of the
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS — (Continued)
assets’ economic useful lives, specifically with regards to
the plants forming the Terna Grid (lines and stations) and the
linked facilities (remote management and control). The
application of lower depreciation rates for such assets resulted
in a euro 104 million reduction in the ordinary
depreciation as compared to 2002 which was calculated on higher
depreciation rates.
Reclassifications, retirements and other movements include the
effect on utility plant net book value of the change in
ENEL’s structure in 2004 due to the following reasons:
•
the acquisition of the companies operating in the gas market
(Sicilmetano, Ottogas and Italgestioni) and disposal of Aimeri
(waste management), contributing to an increase in tangible
assets of euro 78 million;
•
consolidation of Wisco, resulting in an increase in tangible
assets of euro 12 million;
•
the acquisition by EUFR of some generation companies, resulting
in an increase in tangible assets of euro 31 million;
•
the acquisition of certain North American generation companies,
determining an increase in Enel North America’s tangible
assets of euro 27 million.
The amount of reclassifications, retirements and other movements
in 2004 in the above table also includes current divestments of
euro 134 million, write-downs totalling
euro 78 million and negative net changes in scope of
consolidation of euro 1,114 million, of which
euro 1,262 million due to the sale of NewReal.
Write-downs mainly relate to telecommunication equipment
disposed during 2004 following the implementation of
re-settlement and development plans of generation activity
associated with electricity network (euro 57 million), to
plant parts no longer usable following the starting of
conversion activities at the Santa Barbara thermoelectric
plant (euro 8 million) and to old meters owned by Spanish
distribution companies (euro 9 million). Other changes
consist primarily of current disposals amounting to
euro 124 million and adjustments amounting to
euro 17 million resulting from the translation of
amounts expressed in currencies other than euro (mainly
Brazilian Reais and US dollars).
Reclassifications, retirements and other movements in 2003
include the effect on utility plant net book value of the change
in ENEL’s structure in 2003 due to the following reasons:
•
the disposal of Interpower, which resulted in the
deconsolidation of fixed assets amounting to
euro 450 million;
•
the deconsolidation of CESI resulting in a decrease in net book
value of euro 55 million;
•
the acquisition of the EUFR resulting in an increase in net book
value of euro 169 million;
•
the acquisition of Maritza resulting in an increase in net book
value of euro 55 million.
The amount of reclassifications, retirements and other movements
in 2003 in the above table also includes current divestments of
euro 252 million, write-downs totaling
euro 211 million and adjustments relating to capital
grants recorded in previous years of euro 60 million.
Additionally, as discussed in Note (2), revaluations made
pursuant to the 2004 Budget Law (Law no. 350 dated
December 24, 2003) resulted in a euro 41 million
increase in the gross book value of assets during the year ended
December 31, 2003.
The Company is in the process of converting the Torre Valdaliga
Nord generation plant from fuel oil to coal. The financial
effects reflected in the Consolidated Financial Statements as of
and for the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003 are as
follows:
•
write-downs in the net book value of assets of
euro 133 million in 2003;
•
accruals for expected dismantling and restoration costs of euro
4 million and 58 million accrued during the years
ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively (euro
6.6 million of the December 31, 2003 accrual was used
in 2004);
The Company is in the process of converting the
Santa Barbara generation plant from fuel oil to gas. The
Company obtained the authorization for the conversion from the
Ministry of Productive Activities in 2004, and will begin the
conversion process in 2005. The financial effects reflected in
the Consolidated Financial Statements as of and for the year
ended December 31, 2004 are as follows:
•
write-downs in the net book value of assets of
euro 8 million;
•
accruals for expected dismantling and restoration costs of
euro 9 million;
Concessions, licenses, trademarks and similar rights
2,563
2,707
Extraordinary contribution for Electricity Industry Pension Fund
1,333
1,422
Patents and intellectual property rights
423
489
Other
629
645
11,534
13,576
The amortization of intangible assets for the years ended
December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 amounts to
euro 1,289 million, euro 1,253 million and
euro 1,142 million, respectively.
At December 31, 2004 and 2003, goodwill for the
telecommunications segment includes primarily the net amount of
the goodwill paid in March 2001 for the acquisition of
Infostrada (net of impairment charges) for
euro 3,326 million (euro 4,836 million as of
December 31, 2003), the net amount of goodwill paid in July
2000 for the acquisition of a 5.63% share in WIND for
euro 403 million (euro 441 million as of
December 31, 2003); the net amount of goodwill paid in July
2003 for the acquisition of a 26.6% share in WIND for
euro 1,244 million (euro 1,355 million as of
December 31, 2003) and the net amount of goodwill paid in
2002, for the acquisition of certain of BLU’s assets for
euro 101 million (euro 109 million as of
December 31, 2003).
In view of the outlook of the telecommunications sector and the
downwards revision of growth expectations inevitably affecting
WIND, the carrying value of the goodwill related to such segment
as of December 31, 2002 was tested for impairment. A
valuation of ENEL’s telecommunications business was
performed on the basis of estimated future cash flows, which
involved the comparison of the estimated future
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS — (Continued)
discounted cash flows, to the book value of the
telecommunications segment. This resulted in the determination
of an impairment in value of euro 1,511 million that
was deemed to be other than temporary and was recognized as an
extraordinary charge in the 2002 Consolidated Statement of
Income.
The carrying value of the telecommunications sector at
December 31, 2004 reflects the alignment to its market
value for an amount of euro 1,116 million and was
recognized as an extraordinary charge in the 2004 Consolidated
Statement of Income.
Goodwill for the gas sector mainly relates to the acquisitions
in 2002 of gas distributors (Camuzzi and other minor companies)
of euro 597 million. Such goodwill, mainly related to
the customer base acquired, is amortized over 15 years,
deemed appropriate in view of current and expected performances
of the business and in view of the fact that sales activities
are not directly connected to the expiration terms of licenses
for the distribution of gas. Additional goodwill recorded in
2004 related to the gas sector results from the acquisitions of
the Sicilmetano Group, Ottogas Group and Italgestioni Group
which generated goodwill of euro 29 million. Goodwill
related to the 2004 acquisitions is also amortized over
15 years, a term deemed in line with current and expected
results of such activities.
Goodwill relating to electricity generation activities (Viesgo,
Enel North America, Enel Latin America, Maritza and EUFR) is
amortized over 20 years, deemed in line with the activity
and business plan.
The acquisition in 2004 of a 51% stake in Wisco, a company
operating in the water sector born from the spin-off of former
associate En.Hydro, generated goodwill of
euro 7 million, and is being amortized over
5 years.
Concessions, licenses, trademarks and similar rights include
costs incurred by WIND to participate in the auction for the
awarding of a license for the installation and operation of
third generation mobile telecommunications systems
(UMTS — IMT 2000) as well as license registration
costs. The original cost amounts to
euro 2,447 million, amortized over the residual life
of the license. The initial 15-year license issued by the
Authority for Telecommunications on January 10, 2001 was
extended in 2002 to a 20-year period, effective January 1,2002. Amortization started on January 1, 2003 following the
testing of the service in some areas. The amortization expense
for the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003 amounted to
euro 129 million. Concessions, licenses, trademarks
and similar rights also include approximately
euro 304 million relating to costs incurred by
Infostrada (now part of WIND) to acquire concessions for the use
of international circuits and for the usage and passage rights
provided for in the contract signed in 1998 with Ferrovie dello
Stato (State Railways), regulating the use of the related fiber
optic network. The right of access to the network is amortized
on the basis of the duration of the same (29 years). The
right to use the existing optical fiber network is amortized
over 20 years. The balance as of December 31, 2004,
also includes various other concessions, licenses, trademarks
and similar rights for approximately euro 70 million
(euro 71 million as of December 31, 2003).
The extraordinary contribution due following the suppression of
the electricity industry pension fund, was established through
Law no. 488, dated December 23, 1999 (2000 Budget Law).
Based on the three installments paid, the Company’s final
total contribution of euro 1,940 million (the original
estimate was euro 2,036 million) is expensed on a
straight-line basis over a period of 20 years, as also
permitted by the above-mentioned Budget Law.
Patents and intellectual property rights primarily relate to
costs incurred by WIND, Enel Distribuzione, and Enel.it for the
acquisition of proprietary and licensed software. The main
expenditure in 2004 was concentrated on software for running the
network, billing process and customer services, the development
of Internet portals and administrative systems. Amortization is
calculated on a straight line basis over the expected residual
useful life of the assets (normally between 3 and 5 years).
Other intangible assets mainly relate to leasehold improvements
made by telecommunications companies on technical sites; costs
incurred on projects of various nature, such as start-up costs
incurred by Maritza in
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS — (Continued)
2003 (euro 34 million, amortized over 18 years,
equal to the term of the concession under which the plant is
operated), the development of a cartography system for the
electricity distribution networks, the creation of a remote
meter management system and of NT-Unix applications, the
implementation of new operating systems and leasehold
improvements on technical sites in the Telecommunications
sector, in addition to costs incurred in the acquisition of
rights deriving from two contracts for the construction of
waste-to-energy plants; costs of advertising campaigns carried
out to support new telecommunications services and trademarks
and software development costs. Other intangible assets are
amortized over a period which correlates to the estimated useful
life of the related asset, unless otherwise determined by
contract.
Accumulated amortization and write-down of goodwill,
concessions, licenses, trademarks and similar rights and the
extraordinary contribution related to the suppression of the
electricity industry pension fund, amount to
euro 4,998 million, euro 364 million and
euro 511 million, respectively, as of
December 31, 2004, and euro 3,238 million,
euro 215 million and euro 422 million,
respectively, as of December 31, 2003. The amortization of
goodwill, concessions, licenses, trademarks and similar rights
and the extraordinary contribution related to the suppression of
the electricity industry pension fund, amounts to
euro 655 million, euro 149 million and
euro 89 million, respectively, for the year ended
December 31, 2004, and euro 593 million,
euro 149 million and euro 89 million,
respectively, for the year ended December 31, 2003. In 2002
and 2004, respectively, extraordinary charges included the
mentioned write-downs of goodwill related to WIND for
euro 1,511 million and euro 1,116 million.
Investments in unconsolidated subsidiaries as of
December 31, 2004, relate to Idrosicilia (euro
14 million), for which an agreement for the disposal of the
controlling interest has been signed; Acque di Calabria (euro
18 million), acquired on November 30, 2004 and to be
disposed of and Delta (euro 22 million), acquired on
December 29, 2004, operating in the telecommunication
services market.
Investments in affiliates as of December 31, 2004 primarily
include a 49% ownership in Immobiliare Foro Bonaparte (euro
95 million) following a contribution by ENEL in 2001 of
real estate property and a 49% ownership in Leasys (euro
13 million) following a contribution by ENEL in 2001 of
vehicles leasing and company fleet management activities. The
decrease with respect to December 31, 2003 is primarily due
to the combination of the following factors: ENEL’s share
of losses of Leasys (euro 24 million) and Compagnia Porto
Civitavecchia (euro 7 million); adjustment of the equity
investment in Immobiliare Foro Bonaparte due to the distribution
of part of the share premium reserve (euro 8 million); a
change in accounting for the investment in Wisco (formerly
En.Hydro) (euro 15 million as of December 31, 2003)
which is consolidated starting from 2004 (previously accounted
for under the equity method).
Investments in affiliates as of December 31, 2003 primarily
include a 49% ownership in Immobiliare Foro Bonaparte (euro
103 million) and a 49% ownership in Leasys (euro
37 million). The decrease with respect to December 31,2002 is primarily due to the combination of the following
factors: ENEL’s share of losses of Leasys (euro
72 million); adjustment of the equity investment in
Immobiliare Foro Bonaparte due to dividends received and the
distribution of part of the share premium reserve (euro
11 million); the acquisition for euro 15 million
of a 25.5% share in Hydroitalia, subsequently renamed En.Hydro;
a change in accounting
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS — (Continued)
for the investment in CESI (euro 10 million as of
December 31, 2003) which was consolidated in 2002 and now
is accounted for using the equity method as a result of a
reduction in the interest held.
Investments in other companies mainly include a 7.28% share
(euro 16 million and euro 32 million as of
December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively) of Echelon
Company, acquired in the context of the digital meter project
and listed in the United States, a 12.5% share of LaGeo SA (euro
25 million and euro 26 million as of
December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively), an electricity
generation company from renewable resources in El Salvador,
and a 1% share of Red Eléctrica Española (euro
15 million as of December 31, 2004 and 2003).
(9)
OTHER NON-CURRENT ASSETS
At December 31, 2004 and 2003, other non-current assets
include euro 1,500 million relating to the amount
receivable by the Parent from a primary Italian bank in the
context of the renegotiation of a euro 1,500 million
facility extended in 2001 to Infostrada (now part of WIND). The
facility has been assigned from the original lenders to a
primary Italian bank that agreed to provide financing at a lower
interest rate against a guarantee deposit of the same
outstanding amount of the facility provided by Enel S.p.A. On
such deposit, ENEL receives interest at the same rate applicable
to the facility net of a fee paid to the bank.
In addition, other non-current assets also include loans to
employees of euro 101 million
(euro 111 million as of December 31, 2003), loans
of euro 75 million (due in 2010) due from Excelsia
Otto, emerging from the sale in 2004 of NewReal to Deutsche Bank
and other long-term receivables of euro 200 million
(euro 154 million as of December 31, 2003).
(10)
DEBT
Long-Term Debt
The Company’s consolidated long-term debt balances,
including current maturities, as of December 31, 2003 and
2004, and the related maturity schedules are as follows:
Balance at
Balance at
Current
Long-term maturity
Maturity
Dec. 31,
Dec. 31,
maturity
Summary by type of debt instrument
range
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
After
Total
(millions of euro)
Fixed — rate listed bonds
2005-2033
7,178
7,208
745
225
—
1,000
—
5,238
6,463
Floating — rate listed bonds
2006-2010
602
402
—
166
—
50
86
100
402
Fixed — rate bonds not listed
2005-2008
181
188
70
45
—
73
—
—
118
Floating — rate bonds not listed
2005-2032
1,774
1,853
21
21
22
21
330
1,438
1,832
Fixed — rate bond EU
2005-2010
153
116
38
36
31
9
1
1
78
Floating — rate bonds EU
2005-2009
11
9
3
3
1
1
1
—
6
Fixed — rate bank loans
2005-2014
103
89
18
10
8
6
5
42
71
Floating — rate bank loans
2005-2024
8,319
8,155
314
1,869
688
997
1,248
3,039
7,841
Fixed — rate EU Loans
2005-2009
166
121
36
30
30
12
13
—
85
Floating — rate EU Loans
2005-2018
3,363
3,307
106
267
295
394
408
1,837
3,201
Other financings
2005-2026
166
158
14
13
12
10
12
97
144
Total
22,016
21,606
1,365
2,685
1,087
2,573
2,104
11,792
20,241
Long-term debt as of December 31, 2004 includes bond issues
guaranteed by the Italian State of euro 1,412 million
(euro 1,375 million as of December 31, 2003) and bank
loans guaranteed by the Italian State of euro 133 million
(euro 185 million as of December 31, 2003).
The decrease in long-term debt of euro 410 million is
mainly due to principal repayments of
euro 4,431 million, partially offset by new borrowings
of euro 3,986 million, and euro 13 million
of long term debt assumed with the acquisition of Sicilmetano
and Italgestioni.
Principal repayments made during 2004 primarily included
euro 2,000 million of financing obtained by Enel
Investment Holding BV in 2001 and due in June 2004,
euro 1,000 million obtained by Enel SpA in 1999
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS — (Continued)
and due in October 2004, euro 200 million obtained by
Camuzzi Finance in 1999 and due in July 2004, and repayments of
other debts that fell due during the year.
In the context of the Medium Term Notes program, on May 6,2004, two series of bonds of euro 750 million each and
having 7 and 20-year maturities were issued. The terms of the
issues are summarized in the table below.
As part of the same program, in 2004, Enel Investment Holding BV
issued through private placement a bond issue denominated in
euro for a principal amount of euro 150 million.
Additionally, on October 12, 2004, Terna issued two series
of bonds, one of euro 600 million with a 10 year
maturity and one of euro 800 million with a
20 year maturity. The terms of the issues are summarized in
the table below.
The remaining new borrowings in 2004 consists primarily of
euro 450 million of funds drawn by WIND on two
Facility Agreements underwritten with a pool of banks on
September 28, 2001 and December 4, 2001 to finance
capital expenditure on its telecommunications network. These
credit facilities were utilized for euro 6,311 million
as of December 31, 2004 and for
euro 6,261 million as of December 31, 2003. Such
credit lines expire at the end of 2010 and are subject, for the
full duration of their term, to equity, debt and financial ratio
covenants according to which the availability of funds and the
applicable spread on Euribor are determined. The Company
satisfied all such covenants as of December 31, 2004 and
2003.
With regards to secured loans extended by banks, first and
second degree liens were recorded on the entire capital stock of
companies IT-net Srl, Italia On Line Srl and Mondo WIND Srl,
Enel.Net, controlled by WIND Telecomunicazioni SpA, as well as
the entities TSN and Novatrans, controlled by Terna.
As of December 31, 2004 and 2003 approximately 64% of the
Company’s long-term debt was linked to floating-rates. To
reduce exposure to interest rate mix, the Company entered into
interest rate derivatives transactions for a total nominal value
of euro 10,379 million (euro 9,479 million as of
December 31, 2003), of which euro 9,632 million
is in the form of interest rate swaps (euro 8,580 million
as of December 31, 2003), euro 687 million is in
the form of interest rate collars (euro 873 million as of
December 31, 2003) and euro 60 million is in the
form of swaptions (euro 26 million as of December 31,2003). Considering the above-mentioned hedging contracts,
appropriately weighting the notional amount of the interest rate
collars, the residual amount of debt still exposed to the risk
of floating-rates was approximately 41% of total long-term debt
as of December 31, 2004 (34% as of December 31, 2003).
Short-Term Debt
The Company maintains committed revolving lines of credit with
maximum borrowing limits aggregating
euro 4,000 million and uncommitted lines of credit and
other short-term borrowing agreements with banks with maximum
borrowing limits aggregating approximately
euro 2,999 million as of December 31, 2004. These
agreements provide for interest charges based on prevailing
market conditions. As of December 31, 2004 and 2003, the
average interest rate on short-term borrowings was 2.21% and
2.24%, respectively.
As of December 31, 2004 and 2003,
euro 2,562 million and euro 3,171 million,
respectively, in borrowings from banks were outstanding.
Short-term bank debt includes the use of revolving credit lines
of euro 400 million as of December 31, 2004.
In December 2003, a new euro 3 billion revolving
credit line was extended, of which euro 1 billion
expired in 2004. As of December 31, 2004, the remaining
euro 2 billion, expiring in December 2008, had not
been utilized. In the context of a financial policy aimed at
diversifying sources of financing and at reducing the cost of
funding, in 2001, Enel Investment Holding BV established a
Commercial Paper Program, guaranteed by the Parent, for
euro 1,500 million. In May 2004, the Program was
increased to a maximum of euro 2,500 million. As of
December 31, 2004, euro 2,487 million of
commercial paper was outstanding under such program (euro
1,457 million as of December 31, 2003) and consists of
euro 1,817 million (denominated in Euro),
euro 361 million (denominated in US Dollars),
euro 186 million (denominated in British Pounds),
euro 66 million (denominated in Yen),
euro 31 million (denominated in Canadian Dollars) and
euro 26 million (denominated in Swiss Francs). The
currency risk related to debt denominated in other than euro was
fully hedged through a currency swap entered into at the time of
issuance.
(11)
RESERVE FOR PENSIONS AND SIMILAR OBLIGATIONS
As of December 31, 2004 and 2003,
euro 397 million and euro 399 million,
respectively, are accrued related to the present value of future
liabilities connected with trade union agreements regarding a
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS — (Continued)
supplemental pension fund for managers participating in this
supplemental pension fund program. From April 1, 1998, the
reserve relates only to retired managers. The managers currently
employed are covered by the FONDENEL Fund.
The agreement between ENEL and FNDAI (National Federation of
Industrial Managers), signed on January 23, 1998, led to
the establishment of a Company sponsored pension fund known as
FONDENEL, which is managed externally. It differs from the
previous pension plan, which was based on defined benefits, in
that it is now a defined contribution plan.
Viesgo employees are entitled to retirement and post-retirement
benefits similar to Italian employees, of which
euro 51 million and euro 44 million are accrued
as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively.
The reserve also includes euro 23 million and
euro 19 million, respectively, as of December 31,2004 and 2003, which covers payments in lieu of notice at the
date of retirement, to existing employees who have, among other
conditions, worked at least 35 years, in accordance with
collective labor contracts and current union agreements.
(12)
DEFERRED TAX ASSETS AND LIABILITIES
Changes in deferred tax assets, detailed for temporary
differences and determined by using the applicable tax rate
(IRES 33% and IRAP 4.25%), both current non-current portions,
are as follows.
Consolidated
At December 31,
Statement
Other
At December 31,
In millions of euro
2003
of Income
movements
2004
Write downs of intangible and tangible assets
76
6
(1
)
81
Provisions for risks and charges and write-downs with deferred
tax deductibility
678
169
(148
)
699
Tax losses carry forwarded
941
(55
)
19
905
Investments write-downs
113
164
19
296
Consolidation adjustments and other movements
230
33
95
358
2,038
317
(16
)
2,339
Less non current portion
(1,532
)
(1,257
)
Deferred tax assets, current portion
506
1,082
The current portion of deferred tax assets represents the amount
calculated on temporary differences which are expected to expire
within 12 months from the balance sheet date.
The total deferred tax assets increase of
euro 301 million relates mainly to the increase of
euro 183 million relating to investment write-downs; a
deferred tax asset on intercompany transactions adjusted on
consolidation with an effect of euro 128 million, and
net decrease of euro 36 million of deferred tax assets on
tax losses carry forward mainly related to WIND. In particular,
in 2004, euro 192 million of deferred tax assets on
tax losses carry forward have been deemed not realizable, while
euro 106 million have been recognized on the tax
losses carry forward for 2004 (euro 207 million in
2003).
Total deferred tax assets relating to tax losses carry forward
amount to euro 905 million (euro 859 million as of
December 31, 2003), of which euro 763 million relates
to WIND. Of this, euro 174 million pertains to losses
that may be carried forward indefinitely, while the remaining
portion expires between 2005 and 2009.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS — (Continued)
Changes in deferred tax liabilities, detailed for temporary
differences and determined on the applicable tax rate (IRES 33%
and IRAP 4.25%), are as follows.
Consolidated
Statement
At December 31,
of Income
Other
At December 31,
In millions of euro
2003
2004
movements
2004
Additional depreciation
1,060
213
19
1,292
Extraordinary contribution to FPE recognized over 20 year
basis
467
(29
)
—
438
Accelerated depreciation recognized by subsidiaries in the tax
filing only
603
191
1
795
Gains on disposal
131
(25
)
(8
)
98
Tax effect on allocation of consolidation differences to the net
assets
50
(1
)
12
61
Other movements
204
16
(21
)
199
Total
2,515
365
3
2,883
The provision includes deferred taxes relating primarily to
accelerated depreciation recorded exclusively for tax purposes,
capital gains for which taxation is deferred and income tax
expense for the current year. Starting with 2004, the provision
also includes the tax effect connected with the elimination of
tax-related interferences carried out by consolidated companies
in accordance with new company and tax regulations.
The provision includes also deferred taxes calculated on
adjustments made to the accounts of consolidated companies to
bring them into line with the accounting principles adopted by
the Parent Company and consolidation adjustments. Changes in the
period include accruals amounting to euro 365 million,
representing mainly the accelerated depreciation recorded
exclusively for tax purposes.
Payable to Ferrovie dello Stato for telecommunication network
202
233
Payable to Treasury for UMTS license
181
217
Substitute tax on revaluations (Law 350/2003)
—
228
Other
114
266
3,206
2,618
Litigation and contingent liabilities reserves include
euro 382 million to cover uncertainties, contingencies
and potential liabilities from current legal proceedings
(primarily relating to supply contracts, labor disputes and
plant operations) of a determinate nature that, according to
ENEL’s internal and external legal advisors, are reasonably
estimable and for which the Company believes an unfavorable
outcome to be probable. An additional amount of
euro 77 million has been accrued in the year ended
December 31, 2004. The reserve does not take into account
the effects of proceedings in which a favorable outcome is
expected or those in which an adverse outcome cannot be
reasonably estimated. Further information regarding litigation
and contingent liabilities is provided in Note 22.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS — (Continued)
The reserve also covers additional estimated liabilities and
charges of various nature, connected mainly to the operation and
conversion of plants, penalties and other charges on engineering
contracts, litigation with local administrations for taxes and
fees of various nature. Specific items included as of
December 31, 2004 are euro 50 million related to
costs associated with the eventual issuance of stock under the
stock option plan, euro 31 million related to the
probable unfavourable outcome regarding litigation with the
Authority over the use of network by the Parent Company to
import energy (congestion fee), euro 27 million for
penalties and risks on engineering contracts,
euro 51 million for charges relating to the operation
of generation plants, euro 32 million as an estimate
of damages in excess of insurance coverage and
euro 13 million of costs related to plant conversions.
As of December 31, 2003, the balance included
euro 194 million related to contributions due on
revenues from telecommunications services. On June 8, 2004,
the European Court of Justice readdressed the inquiry made by
the Tribunale Amministrativo del Lazio (the competent Italian
authority) related to the claim made by Italian
telecommunications operators regarding contributions due on
revenues from telecommunications services. Regarding this claim,
the European Court of Justice formally ruled on June 8,2004 that the Italian law requiring the payment of such fees is
not compliant with European regulations regarding such matters.
Based on this information, the accrual was reversed in 2004 and
recorded as other income. Other accruals accounted for during
2003, relate mainly to penalties and risks on engineering
contracts of euro 8 million, charges relating to the
operation of generation plants of euro 179 million,
and an estimate of damages in excess of insurance coverage of
euro 26 million.
Minority interests as of December 31, 2004 primarily relate
to Terna for euro 918 million (wholly owned in 2003),
to Maritza for euro 101 million (euro 93 million
as of December 31, 2003) and other minorities for
euro 112 million (euro 98 million as of
December 31, 2003).
The reserves for early retirement relate to programs to reduce
headcount and represent certain amounts which have been agreed
with employees and certain amounts which the Company believes
will be agreed with employees.
In 2001, WIND bought a 20-year license for the installation and
operation of third generation mobile telecommunications system
(UMTS — IMT 2000) for euro 2,447 million, of
which euro 181 million is due in the years from 2006
to 2010 (euro 36 million is due in 2005 and is classified
in other current liabilities).
The payable to Ferrovie dello Stato relates to the usage and
transmission rights of the fiber optic network (euro
30 million is due in 2005 and is classified in other
current liabilities).
The amount included in Substitute tax on revaluations (Law
350/2003) relates to the revaluation of assets carried out in
the statutory accounts of the main Italian ENEL companies. As of
December 31, 2004, amounts due are paid in full.
Other includes long-term trade and other payables.
(14)
SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Share Capital
In accordance with the resolution of the Shareholders’
Meeting held on May 25, 2001, the capital stock of the
Parent was restated in euro (bringing the nominal value of each
share from lire 1,000 to euro 0.50). At the same date, the
shares were subject to a reverse split in a ratio of one share
with nominal value euro 1 for every two shares of nominal
value euro 0.50, effective July 9, 2001. Following such
operations, the capital stock was composed of 6,063,075,189
ordinary shares with a nominal value of euro 1 each. As a
result of rounding, the capital stock was decreased from
euro 6,263 million to euro 6,063 million,
with the balance of euro 200 million transferred to
the Legal reserve. In 2004, 40,446,675 of stock options were
exercised in conjunction with the 2002 and 2003 Stock Option
Plans. The exercise of the stock options increased
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS — (Continued)
shareholders’ equity by a total of
euro 241 million, consisting of
euro 41 million increase in share capital and
euro 200 million increase in additional paid in
capital.
At December 31, 2004 and 2003, on the basis of the
Shareholders’ Register and information available, there are
no shareholders with an ownership interest in the Company
greater than 2% of the capital stock of the Company other than
the MEF. At December 31, 2004, the MEF holds 31.45% of the
capital stock and Cassa Depositi e Prestiti SpA (a company
controlled by the MEF) holds 10.28% of the capital stock. At
December 31, 2003, the MEF held 61.0% of the capital stock
directly or through its controlled entity Cassa Depositi e
Prestiti.
Shareholders’ Equity Reserves
The Legal reserve represents the residual amount of
undistributable earnings restricted from the payment of
dividends pursuant to the Italian Civil Code (the Civil Code).
Under the Civil Code, with respect to income of any year, an
amount equal to 5% of the Company’s and Italian
subsidiaries’ statutory income must be allocated to a legal
reserve until such reserve is equal to one-fifth of the par
value of the Company’s issued and outstanding share
capital. The legal reserve of the Parent represents 24% of its
share capital, consequently a current allocation is not required.
The “Law 292/93 reserve” reflects the residual amount
of write-up of assets of the Parent pursuant to Law
No. 292. As discussed in Note 2, revaluation reserves
of the Parent prior to 1993 have been credited to retained
earnings in the accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements.
Retained Earnings
As provided by Italian law, dividends may only be paid out of
the statutory retained earnings, plus its distributable reserves
and statutory net income for the current year, net of the amount
to be allocated to the legal reserve in the subsequent year. The
legal reserve may not be distributed. Approximately
euro 2,719 million was available for dividends as of
December 31, 2004.
On November 25, 2004, Company paid an interim dividend of
euro 0.33 per share to holders of record as of
November 22, 2004, for a total amount of
euro 2,014 million. On June 24, 2004, the Company
paid a dividend of euro 0.36 per share to holders of record
as of June 21, 2004, for a total amount of
euro 2,195 million. On June 26, 2003 Company paid
a dividend of euro 0.36 per share to holders of record as
of June 23, 2003, for a total amount of
euro 2,183 million.
Reconciliation of Parent’s Statutory Net Income and
Shareholders’ Equity to Consolidated Net Income and
Shareholders’ Equity
In the Parent’s statutory financial statements, investments
in subsidiaries are accounted for under the cost method,
consequently they do not reflect the consolidation of the
Subsidiary Companies.
Adjustments are made in consolidating the accounts of the Parent
and the Subsidiary Companies to reflect the consolidation
principles described in Note 2. In addition, adjustments
are made to eliminate the effect of certain tax-basis reporting
applied by the Parent and the Subsidiary Companies in their
respective statutory accounts.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS — (Continued)
The reconciliation of shareholders’ equity and net income
as reported in the statutory financial statements to those
reported in the consolidated financial statements is as follows:
Net Income
Shareholders’ Equity
2004
2003
2002
2004
2003
2002
(millions of euro)
Per Parents’ statutory financial statements
7,272
607
2,045
15,301
11,997
13,573
Effects of consolidating the financial statements of the
Subsidiary Companies
(151
)
2,192
(370
)
9,111
9,576
7,358
Elimination of intra-group gains and other
(4,415
)
(290
)
(27
)
(4,565
)
(449
)
(159
)
Per consolidated financial statements
2,706
2,509
2,008
19,847
21,124
20,772
In 2004, 2003, and 2002 the elimination of intra-group gains
relates mainly to the gains on disposal of entities sold to
other controlled companies as well as the elimination of margins
earned on captive generation plant construction activities.
— Connections, inspections and repositioning services
675
684
645
— Other operating revenues
5,091
5,407
4,515
Total other
5,766
6,091
5,160
36,489
31,317
29,977
Revenues from energy sales and transport increased from 2003 to
2004 by euro 5,330 million mainly due to the start of
operation of the Single Buyer in April 2004 (see Note 2).
Other changes include an increase in sales on the free market of
euro 508 million, revenues for dispatching services
and capacity payment of euro 627 million (included in
the tariff framework starting in 2004), and an increase in sales
outside of Italy of euro 283 million. The increase was
partially offset by a decrease in energy sales on the regulated
market in Italy of euro 1,296 million related to the
opening of the free market.
The decrease in electricity equalization fund contributions
relates to the fact that contributions for the year ended
December 31, 2003 include euro 102 million
relating to costs incurred for green certificates in 2002 which
were reimbursed to ENEL in 2003 and euro 68 million
related to contributions recognized on previous years’
electricity generated by plants falling under the incentives of
CIP Resolution no. 6/92.
Revenues from telecommunication services increased by
euro 209 million from 2003 to 2004 due to market
growth reported by WIND in the pre-paid mobile telephone
segment, an increase in revenues from operations in Greece of
euro 66 million, partly offset by a slight decline in
revenues from fixed line telephone and internet services.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS — (Continued)
Revenues from the sale of natural gas to end users increased by
euro 120 million from 2003 to 2004 mainly due to
increased sales volume (increase of 16.7%). The acquisitions of
the Sicilmetano Group and Ottogas in 2004 have increased
revenues by euro 24 million.
Other operating revenues for the year ended December 31,2004 have decreased as compared to 2003 due to lower amounts of
fuel trading of which euro 166 million decrease
relates to gas and euro 539 relates to other fuel. The
decrease in trading activity relates to the termination near the
end of 2003 of the contract with Tirreno Power SpA and Edipower
SpA. Other decreases relate to a decrease of
euro 641 million in activity related to engineering
and construction sectors, the termination of activity in the
environmental sector (decrease of approximately
euro 59 million), offset by proceeds from recognition
of the right to the reimbursement of stranded costs related to
costs of generation and natural gas imported from Nigeria
sustained in 2000-2004 as determined by the Ministry of
Productive Activities in the Decree dated August 6, 2004
(proceeds of euro 1,219 million),
euro 194 million related to contributions due on
revenues from telecommunications services previously accrued as
of December 31, 2003 and reversed in 2004 due to the
European Court of Justice’s formal rule on June 8,2004 that the Italian law requiring the payment of such fees was
not compliant with European regulations regarding such matters,
an increase in volume generated by the very-high voltage
transmission lines in Brazil (increase of
euro 66 million), additional revenue generated by
construction contracts in Oman and an increase in revenue
generated by facility management activities (increase of
euro 50 million).
Other operating revenues for the year ended December 31,2003 include: an awarding by the Authority of
euro 147 million in prizes for the improvement in
service quality achieved by Enel Distribuzione; the
reimbursement of euro 410 million of charges
previously recorded in 2002 related to the hydroelectric
surcharge as a result of the issue by the Ministry of Productive
Activities of a Decree dated September 10, 2003
establishing the terms for the reimbursement of the
hydroelectric surcharge; euro 55 million resulting
from the termination of a contract for the construction of a
power plant in Libya; higher fees from the use of the national
transmission network of euro 52 million due to a
tariff increase and a higher volume of electricity transported;
revenues generated by the initiation of service in 2003 of
very-high voltage transmission lines in Brazil of
euro 52 million and stronger Engineering and
Contracting activities of Enelpower for third parties of
euro 164 million.
In 2004, sales in countries other than Italy amounted to
euro 2,225 million (euro 2,036 million and
euro 1,596 million in 2003 and 2002, respectively), of
which euro 1,837 million were in Europe
(euro 1,482 million and euro 1,085 million
in 2003 and 2002, respectively), euro 71 million in
the Middle East (euro 246 million and
euro 363 million in 2003 and 2002, respectively) and
euro 302 million in the Americas (euro
233 million and euro 91 million in 2003 and 2002,
respectively).
Personnel expenses decreased by euro 125 million from
2003 to 2004 due to the effect of changes in the scope of
consolidation and the reduction in headcount in the Sales,
Infrastructure and Networks Division (in the electricity area).
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS — (Continued)
(17)
PURCHASED POWER, FUEL FOR THERMAL GENERATION AND MATERIALS
AND SUPPLIES
Purchased power, fuel for thermal generation and materials and
supplies for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and
2002 were as follows:
2004
2003
2002
(millions of euro)
Purchased power
10,465
4,620
4,802
Fuel for thermal generation
3,598
4,101
4,255
Total fuel and power
14,063
8,721
9,057
Materials consumption
1,255
1,733
1,975
Gas for distribution and fuel for trading
1,817
2,378
2,237
Total materials and supplies
3,072
4,111
4,212
17,135
12,832
13,269
The increase in the cost of purchased power reflects the start
of operation of the Single Buyer in April 2004 (see Note 2).
The decrease in the cost of fuel for thermal generation reflects
mainly the change in the scope of activity following the
disposal of Eurogen in 2002 and Interpower in 2003.
The decrease in cost of materials is due to a decrease in the
amount of activity of the engineering and construction sectors,
as compared to 2003.
The decrease in the purchases of gas for distribution and fuel
for trading is related to a decline of fuel purchased for
trading.
The increase in the electricity transmission fees from 2003 to
2004 is substantially due to an increase in energy volume
transported. On September 10, 2003, a legislative decree
defining the parameters for the reimbursement of the
hydroelectric surcharge was issued. According to its provisions,
Enel Produzione and Enel Green Power recorded an overall benefit
in 2003 of euro 410 million, equal to the charge
recorded for the hydroelectric surcharge in the
2002 statement of income.
Interconnections and roaming costs declined from 2003 to 2004 by
euro 35 million as a result of the development of
proprietary networks, allowing the reduction of traffic which
was diverted to other operators. Roaming costs increased by
euro 6 million, while interconnection costs decreased
by euro 41 million.
Interconnections and roaming costs declined from 2002 to 2003 by
euro 45 million as a result of the development of
proprietary networks, allowing the reduction of traffic which
was diverted to other operators. Roaming costs declined by
euro 32 million, while interconnection costs decreased
by euro 13 million.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS — (Continued)
The Company has entered into various operating leases, primarily
related to offices, vehicles and office equipment, used in the
normal course of business. The original lease terms generally do
not exceed six years in accordance with Italian law, but may be
renewed upon expiration. Rental expense for significant leases
totalled approximately euro 234 million,
euro 194 million and euro 216 million for
the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002,
respectively. Future rental payments are estimated to be
euro 331 million in 2005, euro 322 million in
2006, euro 330 million in 2007,
euro 337 million in 2008 and
euro 346 million in 2009, respectively.
Interest and other charges on loans from banks and other
financial institutions
453
547
510
Interest on short-term debt from banks and other financial
institutions
99
148
200
Foreign exchange differences
198
268
159
Other
218
128
177
1,473
1,555
1,464
Net financial expense decreased by euro 27 million
over the previous year mainly due to a reduction in the average
cost of debt.
(20)
EXTRAORDINARY INCOME AND EXPENSES
Extraordinary income for the year ended December 31, 2004
amounts to euro 1,151 million and consists of the following:
•
gain on the sale of a 50% share in Terna, placed on the market
in June 2004, amounting to euro 860 million (inclusive
of the share in net income for the 1st Half of 2004);
•
gain of euro 113 million related to the sale of
NewReal;
•
adjustments of various nature relating to WIND, equal to
euro 29 million;
•
reversal of euro 22 million from the Provision for
restructuring costs, accrued in the previous year in the Real
estate sector;
•
euro 26 million of adjustments on income taxes for the
previous year resulting from the definition of the tax treatment
of some items, following clarifications not issued at the time
at which the 2003 financial statements were prepared;
•
capital gains of euro 11 million realized on the
disposal of minor distribution networks;
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS — (Continued)
Extraordinary expenses for the year ended December 31, 2004
amount of euro 1,969 million and consists of the following:
•
write-down of euro 1,116 million for consolidation
differences related to the Telecommunication sector to align its
carrying value with the market value implied in the bid
considered by Enel’s Board of Directors in the meeting held
on April 9;
•
charges on early retirement incentives of
euro 435 million;
•
write-downs of euro 57 million for fixed assets no
longer in use related to WIND;
•
costs incurred by Enel SpA related to the stock market placement
of a 50% share in the capital of Terna, amounting to euro
52 million. The amount includes the provision of
euro 16 million to recognize one additional share to
be given for every 20 shares (one additional share for
every 10 shares for Enel Group’s employees) purchased
in the Italian public offer and owned for 18 months from
such purchase and deposited with one of the Italian managers or
any other member of Monte Titoli (“bonus share”);
•
adjustments to balance sheet items, amounting to
euro 41 million, due to differences emerging upon the
application of new corporate law and tax regulations;
•
adjustments of euro 39 million related to energy and
gas transactions completed in the previous years;
•
charges on participation in the tax pardon law, amounting to
euro 31 million;
•
adjustments, write-downs and other items of various nature
relating to WIND, amounting to euro 26 million;
•
write-downs and related accruals of euro 21 million
mainly related to the conversion of the plant in
Santa Barbara;
•
charges of approximately euro 20 million relating to
contractual obligations regarding the transfer of ENEL’s
interest in Elettrogen to Endesa;
•
charges for guarantees given in connection with the sale of
NewReal of approximately euro 20 million;
•
losses related to the sale of a branch of an entity in the water
sector of approximately euro 12 million;
•
previous years’ taxes amounting to euro 9 million;
•
extraordinary charges of various nature, amounting to
euro 90 million.
The net extraordinary loss in 2004, net of tax effect, amounts
to euro 639 million, reflecting different tax rates
applicable to the single components of net extraordinary income.
Extraordinary income in 2003 included:
•
euro 356 million capital gain on the disposal of Interpower
(Note 1);
•
euro 165 million capital gain on the disposal of local
electricity distribution networks, of which
euro 120 million related to the disposal of the
Brescia distribution network (Note 1);
•
adjustments of euro 58 million on income taxes for the
previous year, resulting from the definition of the tax
treatment of a number of items for which there existed
uncertainty when the 2002 Consolidated Financial Statements were
prepared;
•
indemnities recognized by third parties of
euro 44 million;
•
write-backs of euro 37 million as a result of
adjustments made in previous years;
•
adjustments and other items relating to WIND of
euro 31 million;
•
capital gains and non-recurring income of various nature of
euro 69 million.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS — (Continued)
These extraordinary income items were offset in part by:
•
early retirement incentives of euro 256 million;
•
write-downs of euro 133 million and other expenses of
euro 58 million related to the conversion of the
Torrevaldaliga Nord power plant;
•
restructuring and reorganization charges of
euro 92 million, of which euro 69 million
relates to WIND;
•
charges relating to the tax amnesty of euro 83 million;
•
adjustments relating to capital grants recorded in previous
years’ of euro 60 million;
•
write-downs, settlements of transactions due to extraordinary
events, extraordinary reimbursements made to customers and taxes
relating to previous years of euro 48 million;
•
adjustments and other items of various nature relating to WIND
of euro 44 million;
•
write-downs relating primarily to foreign coal trading
activities of euro 23 million;
•
adjustments of euro 20 million on previous year fuel
stocks;
•
expenses of various types of euro 79 million.
The net extraordinary income in 2003 net of tax effect amounts
to euro 8 million, reflecting different tax rates
applicable to the single components of net extraordinary income.
Extraordinary income in 2002 included:
•
gains on the disposal of Eurogen of euro 2,313 million
(see Note 1);
•
gains on the disposal of the distribution networks in the
municipalities of Milan and Verona of euro 459 million
(see Note 1);
•
euro 64 million adjustment on previous years’ income
taxes resulting primarily from the definition of the appropriate
tax rules applicable to certain capital gains;
•
interconnection fee adjustments and other items relating to WIND
of euro 46 million;
•
adjustments and extraordinary gains of euro 34 million
recorded by the Viesgo Group; and
•
other extraordinary gains of euro 88 million.
These extraordinary income items were offset in part by:
•
a write-down of euro 1,511 million to reflect the
impairment in the value of the goodwill relating to WIND, based
on the outlook for the telecommunications sector and the
downwards revision of growth expectations (see Note 7);
•
early retirement incentives to personnel of
euro 291 million;
•
a write-down of euro 94 million in the value of a
discontinued geothermal plant;
•
adjustments, write-downs and items of various nature relating to
WIND of euro 92 million;
•
a write-down of euro 58 million in the value of
generation plants to be decommissioned in view of their
conversion to combined-cycle technology;
•
a write-down of euro 49 million in the value of parts
of plants destined to international projects in the engineering
and contracting sector which, in view of the adverse economic
situation in the area in which such projects were based (South
America), are no longer expected to be carried on;
•
adjustments and accruals recorded by Viesgo of
euro 39 million;
•
an adjustment of euro 41 million in the unamortized
cost paid upon the suppression of the electricity industry
pension fund following a reduction in personnel; and
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS — (Continued)
The net extraordinary income in 2002, net of tax effect of
euro 1,067 million, reflects different tax rates
applicable to the single components of net extraordinary income.
(21)
INCOME TAXES
The provisions for income taxes for the years ended
December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, were as follows:
2004
2003
2002
(millions of euro)
Italian Current income taxes
1,463
1,396
562
Foreign Income taxes
22
—
—
Deferred
48
(8
)
357
Resizing of deferred taxes and deferred tax assets to changes in
tax rates
—
(47
)
(38
)
Tax incentives on capital expenditure
—
—
(213
)
Release of deferred tax provision following release of
accelerated depreciation reserves and reversal of deferred
provision as a result of revaluation of assets carried out in
the statutory accounts by ENEL companies
—
(375
)
(60
)
1,533
966
608
The difference between the normal tax rate on income before
taxes and the effective tax rate for the years ended
December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 is due to the following
factors:
2004
2003
2002
Normal tax rate on income before taxes(a)
44.0
%
45.0
%
47.0
%
Resizing of deferred taxes and deferred tax assets to changes in
tax rates
—
(1.4
)
(1.6
)
Release of deferred tax provision following release of
accelerated depreciation reserves and reversal of deferred
provision as a result of revaluation of assets carried out in
the statutory accounts by ENEL companies
—
(11.1
)
(2.5
)
Capital gains subject to 19% substitute tax and release of
excess deferred taxes of companies sold
—
(4.8
)
(37.1
)
Adjustments of deferred tax assets and other impacts relating to
WIND
(10.9
)
—
23.2
Tax incentives on capital expenditure
—
—
(9.0
)
Impact due to corporate operations in the gas sector
—
—
5.0
Foreign income taxes and other taxes
(1.8
)
—
—
Permanent differences:
— on capital gains
(9.2
)
—
—
— other
13.0
0.8
0.6
Effective tax rate
35.1
%
28.5
%
25.6
%
(a)
The normal tax rate is estimated considering Italian Corporate
income tax rate (IRES, which was replaced by IRPEG starting from
2004) of 33%, 34% and 36% for the years ended December 31,2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively, and regional income tax rate
(IRAP) of 4.25% for all years presented. In order to
estimate the impact of IRAP (for which employee related costs,
interest expense and certain other costs are not deductible) an
estimate of the different tax base has been made based on
historical trends. The impact of different tax rates used in
foreign countries is reflected among other differences.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS — (Continued)
Deferred income taxes reflect the tax effects of temporary
differences between the carrying amounts of assets and
liabilities for financial reporting and income tax purposes.
Deferred tax assets have also been calculated on loss
carry-forwards for tax purposes to the extent that their
recovery is reasonably certain.
Income taxes for the year ended December 31, 2004 benefited
from the reversal of euro 474 million of net deferred
tax liabilities mainly resulting from the reversal of deferred
tax liabilities on subsidiaries’ impairment no longer owed
due to the 2004 tax exemption on investments gain or losses, net
of a reversal of deferred tax assets of
euro 192 million following the new assessment of the
recoverability of Telecommunication sector’s tax losses
carry forward.
Income taxes for the year ended December 31, 2003 benefited
from the reversal of euro 375 million (contributing
for 11.1 percentage points of the difference between the
normal tax rate and the effective tax rate), resulting from the
revaluation of assets carried out by main ENEL companies on
certain classes of assets, limited to the spread between fiscal
and ordinary accumulated depreciation. The carrying value of
these assets in the statutory accounts as of December 31,2003 is therefore now in line with that reported in the
Consolidated Financial Statements. The amount of the revaluation
is subject to a 19% substitute tax rate, while deferred
taxes accrued on the difference between the carrying value in
the statutory accounts (equivalent to the tax base) and that
reported for consolidation purposes were calculated at the
ordinary corporate tax rate. As a consequence, the portion of
the deferred tax provision exceeding the amount of the
substitute tax was reversed and accounted for as an offset item
under 2003 income taxes. A further benefit equal to
euro 164 million (contributing for 4.8 percentage
points of the difference between the normal tax rate and the
effective tax rate) arises from the taxation of the capital gain
on the disposal of Interpower and local electricity distribution
networks at the 19% substitute tax rate instead of the
ordinary corporate tax rate. Finally, the adjustments made to
deferred taxes to take into consideration the amended tax rate
resulted in a euro 47 million net positive component.
Income taxes for the year ended December 31, 2002
(contributing for 1.4 percentage points of the difference
between the normal tax rate and the effective tax rate)
benefited from the taxation of large capital gains (euro
2,772 million) at a 19% substitute tax rate instead of
the ordinary corporate tax rate, in addition to the further
benefit from the reversal of the surplus in deferred tax
provisions accrued at the ordinary corporate tax rate on the
temporary differences related to the assets and businesses sold
during the year. Benefits deriving from tax incentives on
capital expenditure (Tremonti-bis Law) for 2002 amounted to
euro 213 million. This tax incentive was no longer
applicable in 2003.
Deferred tax assets recognized by WIND in 2004, 2003 and 2002,
on the tax loss carry-forward for each of these years were
euro 106 million, euro 207 million and
euro 265 million, respectively. In 2004 and 2002,
following the definition of a new business plan, deferred tax
assets of euro 192 million and
euro 269 million, respectively, were deemed no longer
recoverable and were consequently written down.
At December 31, 2004, income taxes for all fiscal years
prior to 2000 have been settled by the Company with the Italian
tax authorities.
(22)
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Financial Derivatives
The Company purchases electricity from countries that use
currencies other than the euro and also purchases fuel in the
international oil and natural gas markets, where prices are
generally denominated in U.S. dollars. As a consequence,
the Company is subject to market risks from changes in foreign
exchange rates and commodity prices. The Company is also
directly subject to interest rate risks related to its financial
indebtedness.
Derivative instruments are utilized by the Company to reduce
these risks.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS — (Continued)
Notional Amounts and Credit Exposures of
Derivatives
The notional value of a derivative is the contractual amount on
the basis of which the differentials are exchanged; this amount
can be expressed either on a value basis or on a physical
quantities basis (such as tons, converted into euro by
multiplying the notional quantity by the fixed price). Amounts
expressed in currencies different from euro are converted into
euro by applying the exchange rate at the balance sheet date.
The notional amounts of derivatives summarized below do not
represent amounts exchanged by the parties and, thus, are not a
measure of the credit exposure of the Company.
Although the Company is exposed to credit-related losses in the
event of non-performance by counterparties to derivative
financial instruments, given the high credit standing of the
counterparties, the Company does not expect there to be any
defaults by these parties in meeting their obligations.
Interest Rate Risk Management
The Company enters into various types of interest rate contracts
in managing its interest rate risk. The financial instruments
utilized as of December 31, 2004 and 2003 were as follows:
Notional amount
2004
2003
(millions of euro)
Interest rate swaps
9,632
8,580
Interest rate collars
687
873
Swaptions
60
26
Total
10,379
9,479
The Company enters into interest rate derivatives, particularly
interest rate swaps, with the purpose of decreasing the amount
of debt subject to interest rate fluctuations and to smooth the
cost of debt variability. Under interest rate swaps, the Company
agrees with other parties to exchange, at specified intervals,
the difference between interest amounts calculated by reference
to an agreed notional principal amount and agreed fixed or
floating interest rates.
The Company also enters into interest rate collar contracts to
reduce the potential impact of increases in interest rates on
floating-rate long-term debt. These agreements are normally
entered into when the fixed rate available under interest rate
swaps are considered too high with respect to the Company’s
view about the level of future interest rates. Moreover, the use
of interest rate collars is deemed appropriate under uncertainty
periods, in order to benefit from a possible decline in interest
rates. The Company normally uses zero-cost collars that do not
require payment of an option premium.
Swaptions provide the holder with the right to enter into an
interest rate swap in the future. The Company generally buys the
right to pay a fixed rate or sells the right to receive a fixed
rate should the option be exercised, in order to eventually lock
in a fixed rate hedging transaction at a rate lower than the
actual level.
contracts with a notional amount of euro 855 million
used to hedge the foreign exchange risk related to fuel
purchases, electricity imports and expected cash flows in
currencies other than the euro (euro 1,681 million as of
December 31, 2003); and
•
contracts with a notional amount of euro 715 million
used to hedge the foreign exchange risk related to the repayment
of the commercial paper the Company issued in foreign currency
(euro 440 million as of December 31, 2003).
The Company generally enters into these contracts with respect
to the same amount and date of the repayment obligation or the
cash flow that the Company expects to generate, thus any change
in fair value of these contracts deriving from a possible
appreciation or depreciation of the euro against the other
currencies is fully offset by a corresponding change in the fair
value of the underlying position.
At the end of 2004, the Company also had in place
euro 215 million of foreign exchange forward contracts
(euro 153 million as of December 31, 2003) and
euro 85 million of options (euro 110 million as
of December 31, 2003) used to hedge any residual foreign
exchange risk on an aggregated basis.
The Company uses forward exchange contracts and currency options
primarily to hedge expenses denominated in foreign currencies.
The accounts payable in currencies other than euro are
denominated mainly in U.S. dollars and Swiss francs. Both
“buy” and “sell” amounts of such contracts
are indicated at the notional value. Currency options, traded in
the over-the-counter market, provide the Company with the right
or the obligation to buy or sell agreed amounts of currency at a
specified exchange rate at the end of a specified period,
generally not exceeding one year. Generally, the maturity of the
Company’s forward exchange contracts also does not exceed
one year.
Commodity Risk Management
At the end of 1999, the Company established a new company, Enel
Trade (formerly Enel F.T.L. — Fuel Trading and
Logistics) with the purpose of providing fuel to the individual
generation companies and gas to the sale and distribution
companies within ENEL, to manage the Company’s risk in the
oil market and to develop fuel trading activities on the
international markets. Enel Trade started operations on
June 1, 2000.
In 2000, due to the significant volatility in the currency and
commodity market, and taking into consideration the next phase
of the Energy Market that could discontinue the Equalization
Fund mechanism (under Decree 70/1997), the Company adopted a
systematic approach to cover commodity pricing and currency risk
linked to the time lag present in the reimbursement mechanism.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS — (Continued)
Since 2000, Enel Trade has entered into derivative contracts on
commodities to fix part of the margin between the costs and
contribution received from the Authority under the Equalization
Fund mechanism in place until March 2004.
In April 2004, the Italian power exchange became operational and
the Company became exposed to price risk arising from the
pricing mechanism based on competitive bidding among generation
companies. However, under the current regulatory framework,
generation companies may also sell electricity through
over-the-counter bilateral contracts with buyers, and enter into
contracts for differences with the Single Buyer. ENEL’s use
of both over-the-counter bilateral contracts and contracts for
differences with the Single Buyer has contributed to reduced
power exchange price risk exposure.
The Company does not enter into commodity derivatives for
speculative trading purposes.
The Company has entered into different transactions with the
intent to align revenues and costs through the management of oil
price risk in the international market. The derivative
instruments are based on benchmark indexes (for example, IPE
Brent, NYMEX, WTI) that are considered the most appropriate
instruments to hedge the oil index used and to fix the price for
fuel supplies. Any variation in the portfolio value of the
derivative contracts is offset by a corresponding variation of
the market value in the portfolio of the physical contracts,
except for a minor risk arising from the misalignment between
the price index of the oil supplies and the benchmark.
Under the commodity swap contracts, the Company establishes with
a counterparty the exchange, on a specific pricing period basis,
of the difference between the average of an index and the
predetermined fixed quantity value.
For futures contracts, the Company purchases
(sells) standardized contracts on the IPE —
International Petroleum Exchange and the NYMEX — New
York Mercantile Exchange. These contracts are subject to the
daily payment of the margins and, therefore, no credit default
risk exists.
Exposure due to fuel purchased for generation activity, gas
purchased and sold for trading activity, and to energy sold
through the Italian power exchange for which ENEL does not enter
in contracts for differences with the Single Buyer, has been
managed by means of hedging instruments. As a result,
ENEL’s overall volume of contracts to hedge commodity price
risks at December 31, 2004 increased as compared to volumes
at December 31, 2003, due to the uncertainty at the end of
2003 as to the actual starting date of the operations of the
Italian power exchange and the consequent reduced hedging
activity at that date.
National and international concession contracts differences
—
—
— assets
—
—
— liabilities
—
—
Total
0.5
(7.5
)
— assets
22.3
2.9
— liabilities
(21.8
)
(10.4
)
Fair value of financial instruments are disclosed in
Note 26.
Purchase Commitments
The Company has entered into various fuel supply contracts
primarily for the purchase of fuel oil and natural gas. The
Company expects that expenditures related to these commitments
will approximate an aggregate of euro 11,045 million for
the period from January 1, 2005 through December 31,2009. The Company also has unconditional purchase obligations
for electric power. The Company expects that its expenditures
related to these commitments will approximate
euro 3,002 million for the period from January 1,2005 through December 31, 2009.
Insurance
The Company maintains third-party insurance to cover property
liabilities, and other risks in the normal course of business in
amounts that the Company’s management believes are adequate
to cover the risks involved, considering minor additional
accruals included in other non current liabilities. In addition,
the Company maintains casualty and liability insurance against
risks of its business to the extent management considers
appropriate. The level of this insurance is generally in line
with that maintained by other companies in the same industry.
Litigation
The Company is a defendant in a number of legal proceedings
incidental to the generation, transmission and distribution of
electricity. Because of the nature of these proceedings, the
Company is not in the position to predict the ultimate outcome
of certain of these matters, some of which may be unfavorable to
the Company. However, the Company does not expect the outcome of
such proceedings, either individually or in
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS — (Continued)
the aggregate, to have a material adverse effect upon its
financial position or results of operations, therefore, no
provisions are included in the “Litigation and contingent
liabilities reserve”. The most significant litigations are
listed below.
The Italian Antitrust Authority began an investigation in 2002
to assess whether ENEL through one of its subsidiaries, Enel
Energia (formerly Enel Trade), abused its dominant position by,
among other things, including in its standard contract for the
sale of electricity to Eligible Customers in 2002 certain
exclusivity and priority clauses aimed at discouraging them from
changing their electricity supplier. On November 27, 2003,
the Authority determined that this conduct constituted a serious
violation of the European Community Treaty and imposed a fine of
euro 2.5 million. The Company has appealed the
Authority’s ruling to the Lazio Regional Administrative
Court, arguing that it did not hold a dominant position in the
market during the period at issue and therefore it could not
have abused a dominant position, as well as that the conduct of
Enel Energia cannot be attributed to ENEL. While awaiting a
ruling on the appeal, the Company paid the
euro 2.5 million fine within the provided 90-day
period.
Since 1997, several suppliers of equipment to ENEL’s
distribution division have brought civil actions against ENEL,
claiming that they abused their market power in the Italian
electricity distribution sector by imposing contractual terms
and conditions on them. The plaintiffs have sought increases in
the compensation paid to them under supply contracts with ENEL.
ENEL is contesting the suppliers’ claims. The first three
decisions rendered in these cases upheld ENEL’s contention
that civil courts lack jurisdiction to hear these cases. In
1995, the Antitrust Authority, prompted by similar claims filed
by the same suppliers, issued an opinion in which it held that
ENEL’s conduct did not constitute an abuse of market power.
Following the withdrawal of the petitions filed by several
suppliers, the aggregate value of the claims currently pending
against ENEL is euro 163 million. In January 2004, an
expert appointed by the Court of Bari, where one of the
proceedings was pending, confirmed the opinion issued by the
Antitrust Authority.
Following the blackout of electrical service that occurred on
September 28, 2003, as of April 2005, approximately
1,300,000 customers, mainly household, requested a reimbursement
for approximately euro 26 for each customer, on the grounds
of the general agreement for the supply of electricity to such
customers, regardless of the fact that in October 2003, the
Energy Authority had issued a release in which it declared that
customers should have not been entitled to such reimbursement.
Additionally, a joint report on the blackout by the Energy
Authority and the French Commission de Régulation de
l’Energie, dated April 22, 2004, includes among the
causes of the blackout, inappropriate defense measures taken by
the Swiss transmission grids, the non-compliance by certain
Swiss electricity companies with the rules provided by the Union
for the Co-ordination of Transmission of Electricity
(UCTE) and inappropriate measures taken to cure certain
malfunctions. Other inquiries by Swiss, French and Italian
authorities are still underway. On June 9, 2004, the Energy
Authority published a preliminary report that, while not making
any definitive finding regarding responsibility, raised the
possibility that the blackout may have been partially
attributable to the conduct of a number of Italian generation,
distribution and transmission companies, including members of
the Enel Group. On September 9, 2004, the Energy Authority
initiated a formal proceeding to determine whether any of the
companies identified in the report (including Enel Produzione,
Enel Distribuzione, Terna and Deval) were actually responsible.
At the close of the inquiry, which is currently expected by
July 31, 2005, for the portion relating to generating
companies, and by November 30, 2005, for that relating to
transmission and distribution companies, the Energy Authority
could impose sanctions on, or request undertakings from,
operators it holds at fault in the incident.
The Company believes that it was not responsible for the
blackout and, accordingly, has not honored any of these
requests. As of May, 2005, approximately 30,000 of the
Company’s customers have brought legal actions against Enel
Distribuzione or Enel S.p.A. in the Italian courts seeking
aggregate damages for approximately euro 30 million.
So far, the courts issued approximately 2,300 decisions,
approximately two-third of which were unfavorable to the
Company. The Company has appealed and intends to appeal all
unfavorable decisions. Although the claims of each of the
individual plaintiffs are for relatively minor
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS — (Continued)
amounts, an increase in the decisions holding the Company
responsible for such damages could be expected to result in an
increase in the number of such claims and the magnitude of
damages sought. Italian law does not provide for the award of
punitive damages in such cases, and plaintiffs will be limited
to compensatory damages.
The Italian electricity supply experienced certain disruptions
on June 26, 2003. These disruptions, which ENEL effected
upon request of the Gestore della Rete, were defense procedures
carried out when the electricity available cannot satisfy
demand, and are intended to prevent the entire electricity
system from collapsing. The disruptions lasted for approximately
90 minutes each and concerned an aggregate of approximately
7 million customers. The Energy Authority’s initial
inquiry into these disruptions was completed in November 2003.
In its December 2003 report, the Energy Authority primarily
attributed the low amount of electricity available, which
resulted in the adoption of these defense procedures, to certain
structural causes, including insufficient domestic generation
capacity, the resulting dependence of the Italian electricity
system on imported electricity, and the reduction of the
available interconnection capacity available attributable to a
heat wave, as well as to certain specific conditions (including
an 800 MW reduction of imports of electricity from France
under an import agreement between ENEL and EDF). The Energy
Authority censured the Gestore della Rete and generation
companies, including ENEL, arguing that the disruptions were
due, among other things, to the unavailability of certain plants
that we were required to maintain in operations. ENEL has
contested the conclusions reached by the Energy Authority. In
April 2004, the Energy Authority initiated a formal inquiry to
determine the responsibilities of the parties involved in these
events. In light of the results of the preliminary
investigations and in order to gain certainty and limit the
possible negative effects on ENEL, in September 2004, ENEL
decided to pay a fine of euro 52,000 to settle the
potential claims against the Company, as permitted by Italian
law. In January 2005, the Energy Authority ended these
proceedings, and directed the Gestore della Rete not pay ENEL
approximately euro 75 million in sums due to ENEL for
the provision of reserve capacity in the first half of 2003.
ENEL has challenged the Energy Authority’s competence to
issue such a direction before the Administrative Tribunal of
Lombardy; a hearing date has not yet been set. While the Company
believes they will prevail in this challenge, there can be no
assurance that the tribunal will decide in their favor.
A number of urban planning and environmental cases for the
construction and operation of some generation plants and of a
number of transmission and distribution lines are pending. Based
on indications given by legal advisors, the Company believes the
possibility of negative outcomes to be remote. For a limited
number of cases, an unfavorable outcome may not however be ruled
out completely. In case of negative pronouncements, consequences
could consist of the possible payment of damages and costs
related to work required on electrical equipment and the
temporary unavailability of the same. At present, such charges
may not be quantified and are therefore not included in the
“Litigation and contingent liabilities reserve”.
The public prosecutor of Milan initiated in February 2003, a
criminal investigation of the former chief executive officer of
Enelpower, a former senior executive of Enelpower, and 12 other
persons for the alleged commission of certain crimes, including
embezzlement, fraud, corruption, and false statements to
shareholders, in connection with certain transactions carried
out by Enelpower in the Middle East and in Italy. On
March 5, 2003, Enelpower was notified of the pending
investigation and the possible administrative liability it may
incur in relation to the alleged crimes. On June 6, 2003,
the Tribunal in Milan, upon request by the public prosecutor,
ordered the arrest of the former chief executive officer and the
former senior executive of Enelpower on suspicion of such
charges. In response to this criminal proceeding, ENEL and its
subsidiary, Enelpower, initiated legal actions against all
Enelpower employees involved in the alleged offenses, aimed at
protecting the interests of ENEL and those of its shareholders.
In addition, Enelpower notified its suppliers involved in the
investigation that, in the event the alleged illegal conduct
should be demonstrated, it would seek compensation for damages
suffered as a result. On July 11, 2003, the former Chairman
of Enel Produzione resigned after voluntarily disclosing to the
public prosecutor of Milan the extent of his involvement in the
illegal conduct that is the subject of the prosecutor’s
investigation. The Company intends to seek any
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS — (Continued)
damages caused by the alleged illegal conduct, should such
conduct be proved as a result of the pending investigation. None
of the individuals charged to date are currently employed by
ENEL.
On December 3, 2003, the public prosecutor of Milan
requested to bar Siemens AG from receiving contracts from public
entities in Italy because of its alleged illicit relationship
with members of management of Enelpower and the former Chairman
of Enel Produzione. At the same hearing, the Company submitted
to the Court a copy of a settlement agreement with Siemens
S.p.A. under which ENEL will receive euro 20 million
from Siemens S.p.A. for damages to its reputation, as well as
the right to renegotiate existing agreements between Siemens
S.p.A. and Enel Produzione. On February 19, 2004, the
Company entered into a settlement with Alstom Holdings SA,
Alstom Power Inc. and Alstom Power Italia S.p.A. providing for
damages for injury to its reputation of
euro 4.5 million, partly in cash and partly in the
form of a credit applicable to future purchases by ENEL from any
Alstom Group company. As a result of these criminal proceedings,
in December 2004, the Court of Accounts issued a decree freezing
the assets and the credits of the former chief executive officer
and of a former manager of Enelpower, and the former chairman of
Enel Produzione and summoned them to appear in court to
ascertain their alleged responsibility with regards to economic
loss for the government. On February 18, 2005, such decree
was confirmed by a court order. ENEL does not expect these
proceedings to have an adverse effect on their results of
operations and financial condition.
In November 2004, the Energy Authority issued a decision
requiring ENEL to pay the Gestore della Rete congestion fees of
euro 31 million in connection with their long-term
electricity input contracts. ENEL has challenged this decision
in the Administrative Court of Lombardy. A hearing date has yet
to be set.
Environmental litigation and contingencies
The Company has exposure for environmental contingencies as a
result of the installation and operation of electrical
equipment. The Company does not expect the outcome of these
matters, either individually or in aggregate, to have a material
adverse effect upon its position or results of operations,
therefore, no provisions are included in the “Litigation
and contingent liability reserve”. The most important
environmental issues are those relating to the effect of
exposure to electric and magnetic fields generated by the
equipment installed. The more significant environmental
litigation are as follows.
Notwithstanding the fact that the relevant infrastructure is, in
the opinion of Company management, in compliance with applicable
laws, Enel Distribuzione and Terna are currently defendants in
numerous pending proceedings relating to the electromagnetic
fields created by transmission and distribution lines and in
some pending proceedings relating to electromagnetic energy
emanating from substations. In most of the proceedings, the
plaintiffs seek the relocation or removal of lines or
substations that are near to inhabited or occupied residential
or office buildings. In a limited number of proceedings, the
plaintiffs also seek damages based on alleged non-compliance
with regulations setting maximum exposure levels or minimum
distance requirements for lines and substations or on the
alleged health effects of exposure to electromagnetic fields.
ENEL management believes that certain litigation concerning the
effect of electric and magnetic fields could evolve in favor of
ENEL following the coming into effect of a law on
electromagnetic emissions (Law 36/2001) on March 22, 2001,
and the related implementation regulations (Decree of the
President of the Council of Ministers (DPCM) dated
July 8, 2003). The new Law regulates the field and
establishes the fundamental principles to be followed by
Regional regulating bodies, setting rules that apply to the
whole national territory, defining “exposure limits”,
“attention thresholds” and “quality
objectives” introduced by DPCM.
New regulations apply to low frequency equipment such as
transmission lines, distribution lines and distribution cabins,
in addition to high frequency equipment used for the telephone
service, including mobile telephone services. The new
regulations will introduce a ten-year program for the
environmental upgrade of the whole national network to new
exposure limits, in addition to the possibility to recover,
either in part or in
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS — (Continued)
full, costs incurred by the owners of power lines and
distribution cabins through electricity tariffs, according to
criteria to be set by the Authority for Electricity and Gas,
pursuant to Law 481/95, as they represent costs incurred in the
general interest.
Following new regulations contained in Section V of the
Italian Constitution, introduced through Constitutional Law no.
3/2001 that redefines normative, State and Regional
responsibilities, a ruling of the Constitutional Court regarding
relationships between the State and Regions in this context was
issued. The issue arose following the introduction of a law by
the Campania Region (Law no.3 dated November 24, 2001)
setting stricter limits on emissions than those set by the
former related DPCM of 1992 and by the recent DPCM dated
July 8, 2003, also with regards to environmental work on
power lines (requiring extensive work on a considerable part of
the network, without providing specifically for the
reimbursement of costs incurred) which was upheld by the Italian
Government before the Constitutional Court on the grounds that
it exceeds the jurisdiction of the regions and is in contrast
with current legislation. On October 7, 2003, the
Constitutional Court ruled as constitutionally illegitimate the
said law promulgated by the Campania Region, establishing the
principle that limits established by the laws of the State may
not be derogated, also in the case of regional legislation, as
the protection of health must be insured uniformly on the whole
national territory.
A number of urban planning and environmental cases for the
construction and operation of some generation plants and of a
number of transmission and distribution lines are pending. Based
on indications given by legal advisors, the Company believes the
possibility of negative outcomes to be remote. For a limited
number of cases, an unfavorable outcome may not however be ruled
out completely. In case of negative pronouncements, consequences
could consist of the possible payment of damages and costs
related to work required on electrical equipment and the
temporary unavailability of the same. At present, such charges
may not be quantified and are therefore not included in the
“Litigation and contingent liabilities reserve”.
(23)
RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
As the entity primarily responsible for electricity generation,
transmission and distribution in Italy, the Company provides
services to many other state-owned entities. The rates earned
are comparable to the tariff rates charged to similar commercial
organizations.
Under the current regulatory framework, the Company enters into
certain transactions with the Gestore della Rete, the Market
Operator and the Single Buyer (which are wholly owned by the
MEF, the Company’s majority shareholder). Prices and fees
paid to or received from the Gestore della Rete in connection
with these transactions are determined by the Energy Authority.
The revenues generated from the sales of electricity to the
Gestore della Rete represented approximately 5%, 3% and 2% of
total ENEL revenues for the years ended December 31, 2004,
2003 and 2002, respectively, and the revenues generated from the
sales to the Market Operator and to the Single Buyer represented
approximately 8% and 5% of the total ENEL revenues in 2004,
respectively. The generation companies pay to the Gestore della
Rete the additional access fee to the National Transmission
System. The amount of these transactions represents
approximately 3%, 2% and 1% of total operating expenses for the
years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively.
In 2004, the generation companies purchased electricity from the
Market Operator. The amount of these transactions represent
approximately 2% of the total operating costs in 2004. Moreover,
in 2002, the generation companies paid to the Gestore della Rete
the hydroelectric surcharge, due on the hydroelectric and
geothermal production from plants not falling under the
CIP 6 regime, that was discontinued in 2003. The amount of
this fee represented approximately 1% of total operating
expenses for the year ended December 31, 2002. The
Transmission segment earns revenue from a fee per kWh
transported that distributors and suppliers pay to the Company
through the Gestore della Rete. The revenues relating to these
fees represented approximately 2% of total ENEL revenues for all
the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2004.
The Sales, Infrastructure and Networks segment purchases
electricity from the Single Buyer and the Gestore della Rete and
pays to the latter fees for the use of the national transmission
network. The expenses relating to purchases from the Single
Buyer represented approximately 24% of total operating expenses
for the year ended
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS — (Continued)
December 31 2004, while the fees paid to the Gestore della
Rete represented approximately 3%, 7% and 10% of total operating
expenses for the years ended December 31 2004, 2003 and
2002, respectively.
The Company purchases fuel for generation and gas for
distribution from Eni, an Italian oil and gas company in which
the MEF has an ownership interest. Total purchases from Eni were
approximately 5% of total operating expenses in 2004, 8% in
2003, and 7% in 2002.
Total purchases from state-owned companies were approximately
37%, 8% and 20% of total operating expenses for each of the
three years ended December 31, 2004, 2003, and 2002,
respectively.
As the activity of the Equalization Fund is limited to the
redistribution of certain tariff components among the operators
of the electricity market, the Company does not believe such
transactions fall under the definition of transactions with
“Related Parties”. Equalization Fund contributions
recognized in 2003 and 2002 primarily represent the recovery of
incentives arising from past years’ production from
renewable sources. Additionally, in 2003, the Equalization Fund
paid to the generation companies the retrieval relating to green
certificate charges incurred in 2002.
(24)
DIFFERENCES BETWEEN ITALIAN GAAP AND U.S. GAAP
The Consolidated Financial Statements are prepared in accordance
with Italian GAAP, as described in Note 2, which
differs in certain respects from U.S. GAAP. The significant
differences are described and discussed below and in
Notes 25 and 26.
Fixed Assets and Related Depreciation
In accordance with various Italian laws, certain utility plant
balances have been restated. Under U.S. GAAP, such
restatements are not permitted. In 2000, the Company initiated a
plan to replace the existing meters with others based on digital
technology. As a consequence, a one time write down was made in
2001 for Italian GAAP but not for U.S. GAAP purposes, and
the estimate regarding their remaining useful lives was revised.
Additionally, due to the above, differences in gains or losses
on disposal of fixed assets arise between Italian and
U.S. GAAP.
The reconciliations below include adjustments to eliminate the
restatements, and related accumulated depreciation, to reflect
the effect of the recomputation of depreciation expense on a
historical U.S. GAAP cost basis, to adjust for the one time
write-down made under Italian GAAP and to recognize gains or
losses on asset disposals in accordance with U.S. GAAP. The
effect on net income of the change in estimates of the useful
life of the meters amounts to euro 29 million,
euro 48 million and euro 51 million for the
years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively.
Capitalized Interest and Related Depreciation
Under U.S. GAAP, since 1980, interest is capitalized as
part of the cost of constructing an asset in accordance with
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”)
No. 34, “Capitalization of Interest Cost”. Under
Italian GAAP, interest capitalization is permitted, but not
required. For Italian purposes, the Company has not capitalized
any interest since December 31, 1988. The reconciliation
below includes adjustments to reflect the capitalization of
interest on assets, to the extent those assets qualify for
interest capitalization in accordance with
SFAS No. 34, and the related effect on depreciation.
Customers’ Connection Fees
As described in Note 2, as of January 1, 2002, the
Company changed the period of recognition of fees charged to
Non-Eligible Customers for connection to the electricity
network, from deferring and amortizing the effect of the fees
over 20 years, to recording the effect of the fees in
income in the year of assessment. For U.S. GAAP purposes,
these fees continue to be deferred over a 20 year period.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS — (Continued)
Pension and Employee Termination Accounting
As discussed in Note 2, the Company grants certain pension
and other benefits to its employees, as required by Italian law
and under labor contracts. In particular, the Company’s
Italian employees are covered by a plan required under Italian
law and labor contracts which grants a termination indemnity
based on compensation and years of service. For
Italian GAAP purposes, the Company accrues the amount due
to each employee as of the respective year-end, based on such
factors and dates. In addition, the Company is required, by
agreements with Italian trade unions, to provide certain
additional employee termination benefits. The reserve for these
termination benefits is accrued as a liability at the end of
each year and accordingly is not actuarially computed.
SFAS No. 87, “Employers’ Accounting for
Pensions”, requires the provision for pension and other
benefits to be recognized over the employees’ employment
period based on actuarially determined calculations. In
determining the employee termination liability for
U.S. GAAP purposes, the Company has applied Approach 2 of
Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) No. 88-1.
Under this approach, the actuarial present value of the vested
benefit obligation the employee is entitled to at separation is
based on the employee’s expected date of separation or
retirement. The reconciliations below include adjustments to
recognize the pension and other benefits in accordance with
SFAS No. 87 and EITF No. 88-1.
Additionally, SFAS 87 requires the recognition of an
additional minimum liability if the unfunded accumulated benefit
obligation exceeds the accrued pension liability. If an
additional minimum pension liability is recognized, an equal
amount is recognized as an intangible asset to the extent of
unrecognized prior service cost. Any remaining excess is
reported as other comprehensive income, under Shareholders’
equity.
Other Post-retirement Benefits Accounting
As discussed in Note 2, the Company grants certain
post-retirement benefits to its employees, mainly relating to a
reduction in electricity tariffs and contributions to certain
employee programs that provide medical benefits. The related
costs are expensed as incurred under Italian GAAP.
SFAS No. 106, “Accounting for Post-retirement
Benefits Other then Pensions”, requires the provision for
various employee benefit arrangements to be recognized over the
employees’ employment period based on actuarially
determined calculations. The reconciliation presented below
includes adjustments to recognize the other post-retirement
benefits in accordance with SFAS No. 106.
Derivatives
The Company enters into derivatives for general and specific
hedging purposes, which are accounted for under Italian GAAP
based on the nature of the underlying transactions (see
Note 2). The general hedges are not designated against
specific transactions. Under U.S. GAAP, derivatives that
are not designated to hedge specific transactions are accounted
for at fair value with gains and losses being recognized
currently in the consolidated statements of income. Specific
hedges are accounted for as hedges if they meet the qualifying
criteria for hedge accounting. The ineffective portion of
effective hedge relationships is recorded in earnings when
required by U.S. GAAP. The total ineffectiveness recorded
in earnings during the years ended December 31, 2004 and
2003 amounts to euro 0,7 million and 0.1 million,
respectively.
The reconciliation below includes adjustments to reflect the
derivatives described above at their estimated fair value in the
consolidated statements of income, or in other comprehensive
income, as appropriate.
Advertising Costs
Under Italian GAAP, certain advertising costs may be capitalized
if certain conditions are met, and are then amortized over five
years. Under U.S. GAAP advertising costs are expensed as
incurred.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS — (Continued)
Start-up Costs
Under Italian GAAP, the Company capitalizes and amortizes
start-up costs over five years. Under U.S. GAAP, start-up
costs are expensed as incurred.
Internal Use Software
For Italian GAAP, software development costs may be
capitalized if certain conditions are met. For U.S. GAAP
purposes, software development costs are divided into three
categories: costs incurred in a preliminary phase (strategic
decisions, systems and performance requirements, vendors
selection, general conceptual framework, preliminary studies and
planning), development and implementation costs, and training
and on-going maintenance costs. Under U.S. GAAP, costs
related to the preliminary phase and costs related to training,
on-going maintenance, implementation and development are
expensed as incurred. Additionally, under Italian GAAP, the
Company accrues for costs expected to be incurred regarding the
adaptation of software applications. Under U.S. GAAP these
costs are expensed as incurred.
Reorganizations of Companies Under Common Control
Under U.S. GAAP, acquisitions within a group of commonly
controlled companies are accounted for as a reorganization of
entities under common control. Accordingly, assets and
liabilities acquired are recorded at historical cost with no
goodwill or other adjustments to the historical carrying value
of the assets acquired or liabilities assumed. U.S. GAAP
requires the carryover of historical cost and therefore the
elimination of goodwill and other purchase price allocation
adjustments arising on consolidation of companies acquired under
common control together with the related amortization.
FS (Italian State Railways) Right of Way
In the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company, under
Italian GAAP, the total consideration payable to the
Italian State Railways for the rights of way over the FS rail
network is recorded as an intangible asset and residual payments
(13 instalments over the period 1999 to 2011) are recorded
at face value as liabilities. The intangible asset is amortized
over its estimated useful life. For U.S. GAAP purposes, the
intangible asset is adjusted to the present value of amounts to
be paid for liabilities incurred. Amortization is charged on the
adjusted cost of the intangible asset and the discount to
present value of the gross amounts to be paid is charged to
interest expense using the effective interest rate method over
the repayment period.
In 2002, the item included several differences regarding
telecommunications activities between Italian GAAP and
U.S. GAAP, mainly related to customer acquisition costs and
activation fees of which the effect of the adjustments reversed
in 2003.
Goodwill and Intangible Assets
Under Italian GAAP, intangible assets, including goodwill,
are amortized over a period deemed to be representative of the
expected useful life of the assets. Intangible assets and
goodwill are tested annually for impairment. If the fair value
of the intangible assets or of the goodwill is in excess of
their respective carrying amounts, an impairment charge is
recognized for the excess.
Under U.S. GAAP, the Company has adopted Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 141, Business
Combinations (SFAS 141), which requires that the purchase
method of accounting be used for all business combinations
initiated after June 30, 2001. SFAS 141 also includes
guidance on the initial recognition and measurement of goodwill
and other intangible assets acquired in a business combination
completed after June 30, 2001.
Effective January 1, 2002, the Company adopted Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 142, Goodwill and Other
Intangible Assets (SFAS 142). SFAS 142 prohibits the
amortization of all goodwill and
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS — (Continued)
intangible assets with indefinite useful lives, and also
requires that goodwill included in the carrying value of equity
method investments no longer be amortized. Intangible assets,
excluding goodwill, that have finite useful lives continue to be
amortized over their useful lives.
SFAS 142 requires that goodwill and intangible assets with
indefinite useful lives be tested for impairment annually, or
more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate
that the asset might be impaired. Goodwill is tested for
impairment using a prescribed two-step process. The first step
screens for potential impairment by comparing the fair value of
the reporting units to their carrying values. If the fair value
of a reporting unit is less than its carrying value, the second
step measures the amount of impairment by comparing the fair
value of the reporting unit to the fair value of the recognized
and unrecognized assets and liabilities of the reporting unit.
Under SFAS 142, the Company estimates fair value for its
reporting units using a present value technique, incorporating
estimated discounted future cash flow assumptions that
marketplace participants would use in their estimates of fair
value. The annual impairment test of the telecommunications
reporting unit was performed as of June 30, 2004, 2003 and
2002. The telecommunications reporting unit was evaluated on a
stand alone basis, without considering the weighted average cost
of capital benefits resulting from being part of ENEL. As a
result of its annual impairment test performed on the
telecommunications reporting unit as of June 30, 2002, the
Company recognized a goodwill impairment charge of
euro 2,336 million. Based on the impairment tests
performed during 2002 on the other reporting units, no
additional goodwill impairment charges were recognized during
2002. Based on similar tests performed in 2003, no goodwill
impairment charges were recognized during 2003. The
June 30, 2004 impairment test of the telecommunications
reporting unit, evaluated using the same basis as previous
years, did not result in an impairment charge. However, due to a
change in circumstances that the Company believed would more
likely than not reduce the fair value of the reporting unit
below its carrying amount, the Company reperformed the
impairment test as of December 31, 2004, which resulted in
a goodwill impairment charge of euro 3,393 million.
Based on impairment tests performed in 2004, no goodwill
impairment charges were recognized related to other reporting
units.
There are also differences between Italian GAAP and
U.S. GAAP in the application of the purchase method of
accounting which results in different allocations of the
purchase price, in particular the allocation of fair values to
intangible assets and the resulting goodwill.
The differences in accounting for goodwill between U.S. and
Italian GAAP described above results in differences between net
income and shareholders’ equity presented under
U.S. GAAP and Italian GAAP. In 2002, under Italian GAAP,
and as described in Note 7, the Company recorded a goodwill
impairment charge of euro 1,511 million relating to
the telecommunications business in addition to goodwill
amortization of euro 629 million. Under
U.S. GAAP, there was a further impairment charge relating
to the telecommunications reporting unit goodwill of
euro 825 million, and goodwill is not amortized under
U.S. GAAP. In 2004, under Italian GAAP, and as described in
Note 7, the Company recorded a goodwill impairment charge
of euro 1,116 million relating to the
telecommunications business in addition to goodwill amortization
of euro 555 million. Under U.S. GAAP, there was a
further impairment charge relating to the telecommunications
reporting unit goodwill of euro 2,277 million, however
goodwill is not amortized under U.S. GAAP.
No goodwill has been allocated to any other segment.
Camuzzi Purchase Price Allocation
In connection with the Camuzzi acquisition in 2002, under
Italian GAAP, goodwill of euro 597 million was
recorded. Of this goodwill, an amount of euro 566 million
is being amortized over 15 years and
euro 31 million is being amortized over 9 years.
Under U.S. GAAP, the Company recorded a customer
relationship intangible of euro 566 million which is
being amortized over 15 years and a license valued at
euro 66 million which is being amortized over
9 years. The different allocation under Italian and
U.S. GAAP results in additional amortization under
U.S. GAAP of euro 4 million for the years ended
December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002.
2004 Purchase Price Allocation
In connection with the acquisitions in 2004, mainly referred to
gas companies, under Italian GAAP, goodwill of
euro 43 million was recorded and is being amortized
over 15 years. Under US GAAP, the Company recorded a
customer relationship intangible asset of
euro 21 million, which is also being amortized over
15 years, and euro 22 million of goodwill. Under
US GAAP, the goodwill is not amortized, but is tested annually
for impairment. The reconciliation below includes an adjustment
to account for the goodwill under US GAAP.
Restructuring reserve, conversion costs and other reserves
The Italian GAAP Consolidated Financial Statements reflect
accruals for future anticipated restructuring charges.
U.S. GAAP requires that certain conditions must be met
before a restructuring accrual can be recorded. Since these
conditions have not been met, the reconciliations below reflect
adjustments for the difference in the timing of the recording of
costs related to personnel and other costs not yet meeting the
definition of a liability under U.S. GAAP.
The Italian GAAP Consolidated Financial Statements reflect
accruals for certain conversion costs. U.S. GAAP requires
these costs to be expensed as incurred. The reconciliations
below reflect an adjustment for the difference in timing of the
recording of these conversion costs.
Italian Pension System Obligation
As discussed in Note 7, the Company was required to pay
extraordinary contributions to the Italian national pension
system in the three year period 2000-2002. U.S. GAAP
requires the recognition of the required contribution as net
pension cost for the period and recognition as a liability of
any contributions due and unpaid, while Italian GAAP allows
these amounts to be expensed over a 20-year period. The
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS — (Continued)
reconciliations presented below include an adjustment to
recognize the expense in accordance with U.S. GAAP.
Investments in Equity Securities
The Company has investments in the equity securities of Echelon
Corporation and Red Electrica Espanola. For Italian GAAP
purposes, the investments are accounted for under the cost
method, with adjustments to earnings in order to reflect
declines in value judged to be other than temporary. For
U.S. GAAP purposes, the securities are accounted for in
accordance with SFAS No. 115, “Accounting for
Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities”, and are
classified as available-for-sale and are carried at their fair
market value, with the unrealized holding gains and losses
reflected under “Other comprehensive income” in
shareholders’ equity. Realized gains and losses, dividends
and declines in value judged to be other than temporary are
included in income. The reconciliations presented below include
an adjustment to recognize the investments in accordance with
SFAS No. 115.
Current and Deferred Taxes
The Company records deferred taxes in accordance with Italian
Accounting Standard No. 25, which is substantially
consistent with U.S. GAAP, as set forth in
SFAS No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes.”
For Italian GAAP purposes, the Company is not required to
recognize deferred taxes on capital reserves if they are not
expected to be distributed, and the Company has not provided
deferred taxes for the Legal Reserves, Law 292/93 Reserves or
retained earnings. For Italian GAAP purposes, the tax effect
will be recognized when these amounts are distributed to the
shareholders.
For U.S. GAAP purposes, these taxes are required to be
recognized since certain criteria have been met. Furthermore,
under U.S. GAAP, valuation allowances are provided against
the gross deferred tax assets for amounts which are not
considered “more likely than not to be realized”. The
reconciliation below includes the adjustments to recognize
income taxes in accordance with SFAS No. 109.
Additional adjustments to income taxes are also set forth in the
reconciliation below to reflect the impact on deferred taxes
related to the other Italian GAAP-U.S. GAAP differences
described above.
Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations
Under Italian GAAP, legal obligations associated with the
retirement of long lived assets are recognized in the statement
of income and as other provisions for risks and charges, when
the obligation is probable and the amount is objectively
quantified on the basis of the information available at the
balance sheet date.
Under U.S. GAAP, effective January 1, 2003, ENEL
adopted SFAS No. 143 Accounting for asset retirement
obligations (SFAS 143), which addresses financial
accounting and reporting for obligations associated with the
retirement of tangible long-lived assets and the associated
asset retirement costs. The standard applies to legal
obligations associated with the retirement of long-lived assets
that results from the acquisition, construction, development or
normal use of assets. Under this standard, a liability is
recognized for such an obligation at its fair value when
incurred and a corresponding asset retirement cost is added to
the carrying amount of the related asset.
The reconciliation below includes an adjustment to record
accretion expense and depreciation expense in the current period.
Gain on sale of real estate business
On July 1, 2004, ENEL sold 887 office buildings for
euro 1.4 billion, consisting of euro 1.325 billion in
cash and euro 75 million in subordinated debt. Concurrent
with the sale, ENEL leased back certain properties for periods
ranging from six to twenty years at an annual rental of
euro 84 million. In accordance with Italian GAAP, ENEL
recognized in full, on the date of sale, the net gain
representing the difference between the sale proceeds and the
net book value of the office buildings including those that were
simultaneously leased back.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS — (Continued)
Under US GAAP, considering the subordinated debt and certain
agreements requiring ENEL to incur extraordinary maintenance
costs for a portion of the properties, the sale leaseback
transaction has been accounted for as a financing transaction,
with the gain deferred accordingly. The condensed consolidated
Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2004 presented in
accordance with US GAAP reflects the related assets and
liabilities with respect to these sale leaseback properties.
The future minimum lease payments under the terms of the related
lease agreements is euro 84 million for each of the
years from 2005 through 2009, and euro 532 million
thereafter.
The reconciliation below includes an adjustment to record the
gain related to the real estate business in accordance with US
GAAP.
Stock option compensation cost
In accordance with Italian GAAP, ENEL does not record any
compensation charges related to stock options. Additionally,
under Italian GAAP, amounts related to cash awards granted to
employees upon exercise of stock options are accrued at the time
they are granted. Under U.S. GAAP, ENEL accounts for
stock-based compensation plans under the recognition and
measurement provisions of APB 25, Accounting for Stock
Issued to Employees. Accordingly, stock-based employee
compensation cost is based on the intrinsic value (the excess of
the market price of the underlying common stock at the
measurement date over the exercise price of the option), and is
recognized over the vesting period. Under US GAAP, a
modification to include a fixed cash bonus that is contingent
upon exercise of a fixed option award is accounted for as a
combined variable award with the cash bonus reducing the stated
exercise price of the option.
The reconciliation below includes an adjustment to record
compensation cost related to stock option plans in accordance
with US GAAP.
Consolidation
Under Italian GAAP, consolidation is based on the definition of
control according to the Italian Civil Code. Control is defined
as the ability to govern the financial and operating policies of
the enterprise so as to obtain benefits from the activities. The
ability to govern is defined as the holding of the majority of
the voting rights or sufficient votes to enable to exercise
control at ordinary shareholders’ meetings. Exceptions to
the scope of consolidation exist when the enterprise is deemed
to be immaterial or if ownership is limited and temporary.
U.S. GAAP requires a determination of whether there is a
controlling financial interest in an entity by evaluating
whether the entity is a voting interest entity, a variable
interest entity, or a qualifying special purpose entity.
Generally, voting interest entities are consolidated by the
holder of a majority of voting interest. A variable interest
entity is consolidated by the primary beneficiary.
ENEL has a controlling financial interest in certain entities
which are not consolidated under Italian GAAP as of and for the
year ended December 31, 2004. There is no effect in the
reconciliation below, as ENEL acquired these entities at the end
of 2004 for cash and therefore there is no effect on net income
or shareholders’ equity in 2004. However, the US GAAP
condensed consolidated balance sheets reflect the balance
sheets’ of these companies.
Additional share qualification for Terna shareholders
In conjunction with the public offering of Terna, purchasers of
shares at the time of the public offering are entitled to
receive from ENEL one additional share for each 20 shares
(one additional share for each 10 shares for ENEL Group
employees) provided that the share has been continuously owned
for 18 months from such purchase and on deposit with one of
the Italian Managers or any other member of Monte Titoli.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS — (Continued)
Under Italian GAAP, potential liabilities for the
additional shares are recorded based on the book value of such
shares and considers estimates for future forfeited additional
shares. The cost for the potential liability is considered as
extraordinary.
Under US GAAP, the value of the potential liability for
additional shares is recorded as a reduction of the gain on sale
and is deferred until the liability for the additional shares is
known, which in this case, is 18 months from the date of
the public offering. The number of additional shares represents
the maximum potential shares to be issued as of the reporting
date, with no future estimates of forfeitures. Additionally, the
cost of the incremental shares offered to ENEL Group employees,
is recognized as a liability and recorded as compensation cost.
Under US GAAP, the liability for additional shares is
recorded at fair value and subsequently marked to fair value
through earnings.
The reconciliation below includes an adjustment to record the
value of the potential liabilities for additional shares in
accordance with US GAAP, to reduce the gain on sale for
such potential obligations and to recognize compensation cost.
Classification Differences
In addition to recognition and measurement differences there are
a number of classification differences between Italian GAAP
and U.S. GAAP. The main classification differences are:
Extraordinary Income and Expenses
As discussed in Note 2, items are recorded as extraordinary
under Italian GAAP if they meet certain criteria.
U.S. GAAP requires more stringent conditions for the
classification of extraordinary items by also requiring the
underlying event or transaction to clearly possess a high degree
of abnormality and be of a type that would not reasonably be
expected to recur in the foreseeable future, taking into account
the environment in which the event occurs. Items recorded by the
Company as extraordinary in the years presented herein for
Italian GAAP would not qualify as extraordinary items under
U.S. GAAP. Such items would be included within operating or
financing income under U.S. GAAP.
Cash Flow Statements
Under Italian GAAP, extraordinary contributions to pension
funds and the payment of substitute tax on the release of
reserves are treated as cash flows from financing activities,
while under U.S. GAAP they are classified as cash flows
from operating activities.
Summarized cash flows determined in accordance with
U.S. GAAP are presented below:
2004
2003
2002
2004
(millions of
(millions of euro)
U.S. dollars)
Net cash provided by operating activities
4,855
6,843
3,815
6,573
Net cash used in investing activities
(1,940
)
(4,730
)
(4,241
)
(2,627
)
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities
(3,003
)
(2,061
)
239
(4,065
)
Recently Issued Accounting Standards
In November 2002, the Emerging Issues Task Force
(EITF) reached a consensus on EITF Issue 00-21,
“Accounting for Revenue Arrangements with Multiple
Deliverables”. This Issue addresses certain aspects of the
accounting by a vendor for arrangements under which it will
perform multiple revenue-generating activities. In some
arrangements, the different revenue-generating activities
(deliverables) are sufficiently separable, and there exists
sufficient evidence of their fair values to separately account
for some or all of the deliverables (that is, there are separate
units of accounting). In other arrangements, some or all of the
deliverables are not independently functional, or there is not
sufficient evidence of their fair values to account for them
separately. This Issue addresses when and, if so, how an
arrangement involving multiple deliverables
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS — (Continued)
should be divided into separate units of accounting. This Issue
does not change otherwise applicable revenue recognition
criteria. The provisions of this Issue were effective for the
Company for revenue arrangements entered into beginning
January 1, 2004. The adoption of EITF 00-21 did not
have a significant impact on the Company’s financial
position, results of operations or cash flows.
In November 2002, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation
(FIN) 45, “Guarantor’s Accounting and Disclosure
Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of
Indebtedness of Others — an interpretation of FASB
statements 5, 57, and 107 and rescission of FASB
Interpretation 34.” This Interpretation elaborates on the
disclosure to be made by a guarantor in its financial statements
regarding obligations under certain guarantees that it has
issued. FIN 45 also clarifies that a guarantor is required
to recognize, at inception of a guarantee, a liability for the
fair value of the non-contingent portion of the obligation due
to the issuance of the guarantee or, if higher, a probable loss
under SFAS 5, “Accounting for Contingencies”. The
initial recognition and measurement provisions of FIN 45
were applicable to guarantees issued or modified after
December 31, 2002. As of December 31, 2004, ENEL has a
guarantee of indebtedness in favour of one unconsolidated
investment. The term of the guarantee covers the related
indebtedness of such unconsolidated investment. The guarantee
given by ENEL to Elcogas S.A. of euro 14 million was
not issued or modified after December 31, 2002, and
therefore not subject to the initial recognition and measurement
provisions of FIN 45. As of December 31, 2003, ENEL
had guarantees of indebtedness in favour of two unconsolidated
investments, including the guarantee to Elcogas S.A. of
euro 14 million. The other guarantee, the
non-contingent portion of the guarantee given by ENEL to CESI
for euro 3 million as of December 31, 2003 was
determined by management to have a negligible fair value.
Considering the fair value of the CESI guarantee is a negligible
amount, ENEL had no financial impact of adopting FIN 45.
Additionally, the related indebtedness of the CESI guarantee was
paid in full by CESI in May 2004. The maximum potential amount
of undiscounted future payments resulting from such guaranties
is euro 14 million and euro 17 million as of
December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively.
In January 2003, the FASB issued FIN 46,
“Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities — an
interpretation of ARB No. 51,” which clarifies the
application of the consolidation rules to certain variable
interest entities. In December 2003, the FASB issued a revised
version of FIN 46 (FIN 46R) to address certain
technical corrections and implementation issues. FIN 46
established a new multi-step model for the consolidation of
variable interest entities when a company has a controlling
financial interest based either on voting interests or variable
interests. Consolidation based on variable interests is required
by the primary beneficiary if the equity investors lack
essential characteristics of a controlling financial interest or
if the equity investment at risk is not sufficient for the
entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated
financial support from other parties. The primary beneficiary of
a variable interest entity is the party that absorbs a majority
of the entity’s expected losses, receives a majority of its
expected residual returns, or both, as a result of holding
variable interests. Regarding a foreign private issuer such as
ENEL, the requirements of FIN 46 were effective
January 1, 2004, and the requirements of FIN 46R
applied to entities other than special purpose entities for the
period ended December 31, 2004 and as of January 1,2004 to special purpose entities. FIN 46 and FIN 46R
also provide disclosure requirements related to investments in
variable interest entities, whether or not those entities are
consolidated. Certain of these disclosure requirements applied
to all financial statements issued after December 31, 2003,
regardless of when the variable interest entity was established.
As a result of adopting FIN 46R as of January 1, 2004,
the Company was required to consolidate certain previously
unconsolidated entities with which they are involved through
variable interests and are the primary beneficiary (see
note 26).
On April 30, 2003, the FASB issued FASB Statement
No. 149, “Amendment of Statement 133 on
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities”, which
amends FASB Statement No. 133, “Accounting for
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities”, to address
(1) decisions reached by the Derivatives Implementation
Group, (2) developments in other Board projects that
address financial instruments, and (3) implementation
issues related to the definition of a derivative. SFAS 149
had multiple effective date
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS — (Continued)
provisions depending on the nature of the amendment to
SFAS 133. The adoption of SFAS 149 did not have a
significant impact on the Company’s consolidated financial
statements.
On May 15, 2003, the FASB issued FASB Statement
No. 150, “Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments
with Characteristics of both Liabilities and Equity”. This
Statement establishes standards for how an issuer classifies and
measures certain financial instruments with characteristics of
both liabilities and equity. It requires that an issuer classify
a financial instrument that is within its scope as a liability
(or an asset in some circumstances). Many of those instruments
were previously classified as equity. This statement was
effective for financial instruments entered into or modified
after May 31, 2003, and otherwise is effective at the
beginning of the first interim period beginning after
June 15, 2003, except for mandatory redeemable financial
instruments of nonpublic entities. SFAS 150 is implemented
by reporting the cumulative effect of a change in an accounting
principle for financial instruments created before the issuance
date of SFAS 150 and still existing at the beginning of the
interim period of adoption. Restatement is not permitted. The
adoption of SFAS 150 did not have any impact on the
Company’s consolidated financial statements.
In May 2003, the EITF reached a consensus on EITF 01-8,
“Determining Whether an Arrangement contains a Lease.”
EITF 01-8 clarifies certain provisions of SFAS 13,
“Accounting for Leases,” with respect to the
identification of lease elements in arrangements that do not
explicitly include lease provisions. Any lease element
identified under EITF 01-8 should be accounted for under
current lease accounting literature by lessors and lessees. The
Company was required to apply the provisions of EITF 01-8
prospectively to arrangements newly agreed to, modified, or
acquired in a business combination beginning January 1,2004. The adoption of EITF 01-8 did not have a significant
impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
In December 2003, the FASB issued SFAS 132 (revised 2003)
(SFAS 132R), “Employers’ Disclosure about
Pensions and Other Post-retirement Benefits (revised 2003) and
amendment of FASB 87, 88, and 106,” which requires
additional disclosures about the Company’s defined benefit
plan and other post-retirement plan assets, obligations, net
costs, and cash flows. The Company adopted the new disclosure
requirements as of December 31, 2003 (see note 27).
In March 2004, the EITF reached a consensus on EITF 03-1,
“The Meaning of Other-Than-Temporary Impairment and Its
Application to Certain Investments,” EITF 03-1
addresses the meaning of other than temporary impairment and its
application to investments classified as either
available-for-sale or held-to-maturity under SFAS 115,
“Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity
Securities,” and investments accounted for under the cost
method or the equity method. A consensus was reached on how to
evaluate when an impairment of securities or investments is
other than temporary. A previous consensus in November 2003
addressed certain quantitative and qualitative disclosures about
unrealized losses pertaining to debt and equity securities
classified as available-for-sale or held-to-maturity. In
September 2004, the FASB decided to delay the effective date for
application of the recognition and measurement provisions of
EITF 03-1 to investments in securities that are impaired
until additional guidance is issued. The disclosure requirements
of EITF 03-1 remain in effect. The Company has two
investments in equity securities which have been classified as
available for sale and considered a long term as of
December 31, 2004 and 2003. Other Comprehensive Income for
the year ended December 31, 2004, reflects an unrealized
gain in Red Electrica Espanola of euro 7 million. For
the year ended December 31, 2004, the Company recorded
realized losses on Echelon of euro 11 million, of
which euro 5 million was reclassified out of
accumulated other comprehensive income. Other Comprehensive
Income for the year ended December 31, 2003, reflects an
unrealized gain in Red Electrica Espanola of euro 2 million
and an unrealized loss in Echelon Corporation of
euro 5 million. Management believed that the
unrealized loss in Echelon Corporation based on the difference
between the carrying amount and fair value as of
December 31, 2003 was temporary due to the volatility of
the stock price and the positive prospective performance
foreseen by the Company in the medium term. The Company recorded
realized losses on investments in equity securities of
euro 4 million during the year ended December 31,2003.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS — (Continued)
In June 2004, the EITF reached a consensus on EITF 02-14,
“Whether an Investor Should Apply the Equity Method of
Accounting to Investments Other than Common Stock.”
EITF 02-14 addresses the application of the equity method
of accounting to investments in other than common stock. An
investor that has the ability to exercise significant influence
over the operating and financial policies of the investee should
apply the equity method of accounting only when it has an
investment in common stock and/ or an investment that is
in-substance common stock. In-substance common stock is an
investment in an entity that has risk and reward characteristics
that are substantially similar to that entity’s common
stock. The Company will be required to apply the provisions of
EITF 02-14 beginning January 1, 2005. The Company does
not expect the adoption of EITF 02-14 to have a significant
impact on the Company’s financial position, results of
operations or cash flows.
In October 2004, the EITF reached a consensus on EITF 04-1,
“Accounting for Preexisting relationships between the
Parties to a Business Combination.” EITF 04-1
addresses various elements connected to a business combination
between two parties that have a pre-existing relationship and
the settlement of the pre-existing relationship in conjunction
with the business combination. The Company will be required to
apply the provisions of EITF 04-1 to business combinations
consummated and goodwill impairment tests performed beginning
January 1, 2005.
In November 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 151,
“Inventory Costs”, which is an amendment of Accounting
Research Bulletin No. 43, “Inventory
Pricing.” SFAS 151 clarifies that abnormal amounts of
idle facility expense, freight, handling costs and wasted
materials (spoilage) should be recognized as current period
charges. The provisions of SFAS 151 are effective for
inventory costs incurred beginning January 1, 2006, and are
applied on a prospective basis. The Company does not expect the
adoption of SFAS 151 to have a significant impact on the
Company’s consolidated financial statements.
In November 2004, the EITF reached a consensus on
EITF 03-13, “Applying the Conditions in
Paragraph 42 of FASB No. 144 in Determining Whether to
Report Discontinued Operations.” EITF 03-13 addresses
how an ongoing entity should evaluate whether the operations and
cash flows of a disposed component have been or will be
eliminated from the ongoing operations of the entity, and the
types of continuing involvement that constitute significant
continuing involvement in the operations of the disposed
component. If continuing cash flows are determined to be direct,
then the cash flows have not been eliminated and the operations
of the component should not be presented as discontinued
operations. If continuing cash flows are determined to be
indirect, then the cash flows are considered to be eliminated
and the operations of the component should be presented as
discontinued operations. In order to determine the significance
of the continuing involvement, consideration must be given to
the ability to influence the operating and or financial policies
of the disposed component, as well as the retention of risk or
the ability to obtain benefits. The Company will be required to
apply the provisions of EITF 03-13 to a component of an
enterprise that is either disposed of or classified a held for
sale beginning January 1, 2005.
In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123
(revised 2004), Share-Based Payment, which is a revision
of SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation. SFAS No. 123(R) supersedes APB
Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to
Employees, and amends SFAS No. 95, Statement of
Cash Flows. Generally, the approach in
SFAS No. 123(R) is similar to the approach described
in SFAS No. 123. However, SFAS No. 123(R)
requires all share-based payments to employees, including grants
of employee stock options, to be recognized in the income
statement based on their fair values. Pro forma disclosure is no
longer an alternative. Also, SFAS No. 123(R) provides
significant additional guidance regarding the valuation of
employee stock options. While SFAS No. 123(R) does not
require the use of a specific option-pricing model, it does
indicate that lattice models usually will provide a better
estimate of fair value of an employee stock option. The company
currently prepares the pro forma disclosures required under
SFAS No. 123 using the Black-Scholes option-pricing
model.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS — (Continued)
SFAS No. 123(R) must be adopted no later than
January 1, 2006. Early adoption is permitted in periods in
which financial statements have not yet been issued.
SFAS No. 123(R) permits public companies to adopt its
requirements using one of two methods:
•
A “modified prospective” method in which compensation
cost is recognized beginning with the effective date
(a) based on the requirements of SFAS No. 123(R)
for all share-based payments granted or modified after the
effective date and (b) based on the requirements of
SFAS No. 123 for all awards granted to employees prior
to the effective date of SFAS No. 123(R) that remain
unvested on the effective date.
•
A “modified retrospective” method that includes the
requirements of the modified prospective method described above,
but also permits entities to restate based on the amounts
previously recognized under SFAS No. 123 for purposes
of pro forma disclosures of either (a) all prior periods
presented or (b) prior interim periods of the year of
adoption.
As permitted by SFAS No. 123, the company currently
accounts for share-based payments to employees using the APB
Opinion No. 25 intrinsic-value method. Accordingly, the
adoption of the SFAS No. 123(R) fair value method will
affect the Company’s results of operations. The impact of
adoption of SFAS No. 123(R) on 2006 net income
and earnings per share has not yet been determined by the
Company. However, the Company does not believe the impact of
this standard on the Company’s financial position, results
or operations or cash flows will be materially different than
described in the disclosure of pro forma net income and earnings
per share in the Stock-Based Compensation disclosure in
footnote 25.
In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS Statement
No. 153, Exchanges of Nonmonetary Assets, which
eliminates an exception in APB 29 for nonmonetary exchanges
of similar productive assets and replaces it with a general
exception for exchanges of nonmonetary assets that do not have
commercial substance. This Statement will be effective for the
Company for nonmonetary asset exchanges occurring on or after
January 1, 2006.
In March 2005, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation
(FIN) No. 47 Accounting for Conditional Asset
Retirement Obligations, which clarifies that a liability (at
fair value) must be recognized for asset retirement obligations
when it has been incurred if the amount can be reasonably
estimated, even if settlement of the liability is conditional on
a future event. FIN 47 is effective as of December 31,2005. The Company is reviewing its asset retirement obligations
to determine the need to record a liability to cover any
conditional obligation. The Company is still evaluating the
impact of the adoption of FIN 47.
In May 2005, the FASB issued SFAS 154, “Accounting Changes
and Error Corrections — a Replacement of APB Opinion
No. 20 and FASB Statement No. 3”. SFAS 154
requires retrospective application to prior period financial
statements of changes in accounting principle, unless it is
impracticable to determine either the period-specific effects or
the cumulative effect of the change. SFAS 154 also
redefines “restatement” as the revising of previously
issued financial statements to reflect the correction of an
error. This statement is effective for accounting changes and
corrections of errors made in fiscal years beginning after
December 15, 2005. The Company does not believe that the
adoption of SFAS 154 will have a significant impact on the
consolidated financial statements.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS — (Continued)
(25)
RECONCILIATION BETWEEN NET INCOME AND SHAREHOLDERS’
EQUITY DETERMINED UNDER ITALIAN GAAP AND U.S. GAAP
The following table summarizes the significant adjustments to
consolidated net income for the years ended December 31,2004, 2003 and 2002 that would be required if U.S. GAAP had
been applied instead of Italian GAAP:
2004
2003
2002
2004
(millions of
(millions of euro)(a)
U.S. dollars)(a)
Net income as reported in the Consolidated Statements of Income
2,706
2,509
2,008
3,663
Items increasing (decreasing) reported net income:
Fixed assets and related depreciation
907
110
391
1,228
Capitalized interest and related depreciation(b)
(33
)
(67
)
(37
)
(44
)
Customers’ connection fees
(490
)
(497
)
(491
)
(663
)
Pension and employee termination accounting
(108
)
(7
)
(71
)
(146
)
Other post-retirement benefits accounting
(14
)
(24
)
(22
)
(19
)
Derivatives
1
(3
)
(42
)
1
Stock compensation costs
(89
)
—
—
(120
)
Early retirement program
197
—
—
267
Additional share qualification for Terna’s shareholders
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS — (Continued)
(a)
Except per-share data which is in Euro and U.S. dollars.
(b)
Includes related depreciation of euro 75 million,
euro 70 million, euro 72 million and
U.S. $102 million, respectively.
(c)
The per share amount has been calculated in accordance with
SFAS No. 128, “Earnings Per Share”. See
Note 26 for additional information on earnings per share.
For purposes of these calculations the weighted average number
of shares, taking into account the reverse stock split, was
6,063,075,189 shares as of December 31, 2002 and 2003,
and was 6,086,831,617 shares as of December 31, 2004.
(d)
Diluted per share amounts have been calculated in accordance
with SFAS No. 128, “Earnings Per Share” and
take into account the options outstanding with a potentially
dilutive effect as of December 31, 2004.
The following table summarizes the significant adjustments to
consolidated shareholders’ equity as of December 31,2004 and 2003 that would be required if U.S. GAAP had been
applied instead of Italian GAAP:
2004
2003
2004
(millions of
(millions of euro)
U.S. dollars)
Shareholders’ equity as reported in the Consolidated
Balance Sheet
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS — (Continued)
(a)
Includes related accumulated depreciation of
euro 10,824 million, euro 10,374. million, and
U.S. $14,653 million, respectively.
(b)
Includes related accumulated depreciation of
euro 667-million, euro 604. million and
U.S.$903 million, respectively.
The condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of
December 31, 2004 and 2003 presented below have been
restated to reflect the differences between Italian GAAP and
U.S. GAAP.
The condensed consolidated statements of income for the years
ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 presented below have
been restated to reflect the differences between Italian GAAP
and U.S. GAAP.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS — (Continued)
The condensed consolidated statements of changes in
shareholders’ equity for the years ended December 31,2004, 2003 and 2002 presented below have been restated to
reflect the differences between Italian GAAP and U.S. GAAP
as discussed above.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS’
EQUITY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS — (Continued)
(26)
ADDITIONAL U.S. GAAP DISCLOSURES
(a)
Concentrations of Risk and Certain Significant Estimates
The Company’s business is largely determined by laws,
regulations and policies established by the European Union and
the Italian government. As described in Note 3, the
regulatory framework for the Italian electricity market has
changed significantly in recent years with the implementation of
the Bersani Decree, designed to liberalize and create more
competition in the Italian electricity market. The changes
caused by the Bersani Decree include the adoption of a new
tariff structure, the restructuring of the Company’s
transmission business in order to transfer the management of the
transmission network to the System Operator, the reorganization
of the Company’s generation, transmission and distribution
operations into separate business units and the requirement that
the Company sell no less than 15,000 MW of its generating
capacity. The Bersani Decree was amended following the enactment
of a law in October 2003 that provided, among other things, for
the reunification of management and operation of the national
transmission grid with its ownership under a single private
entity. An implementing decree enacted in May 2004 provides for
the transfer from the Gestore della Rete to Terna of the
responsibility to manage the national transmission grid and the
related assets by October 31, 2005, although the Gestore
della Rete will still retain its other responsibilities.
Following this transfer, the Company will no longer control
Terna, as no electricity operator, including ENEL, shall be
entitled to voting rights in excess of 5% with respect to the
appointment of Terna’s directors. In addition, the Company
was legally required to reduce its holding in Terna to no more
than 20% by July 1, 2007. In February 2005, Terna and the
Gestore della Rete entered into an agreement for the transfer to
Terna of these management activities. The transaction remains
subject to the approval of the Antitrust Authority.
Tariff Structure
Prices paid by all Italian customers for electricity include a
transmission component, a distribution component, a generation
component covering the price of the electricity itself and
system charges. Under the current electricity tariff regime, all
customers pay regulated prices, set either directly by the
Energy Authority or in accordance with Energy Authority
guidelines and subject to its approval, for the transmission and
distribution components and system charges. The transmission and
distribution components, together referred to as “transport
charges,” are subject to a price cap mechanism aimed at
progressively reducing these charges on the basis of annual
efficiency targets. For customers purchasing electricity on the
regulated market, the Energy Authority also regulates the
generation component, which is set on a quarterly basis, while
customers purchasing electricity on the free market pay prices
agreed through bilateral contracts or on the power exchange. The
Energy Authority sets base tariff levels every four years.
In 2004, the Energy Authority set new base tariffs for the
2004-2007 period, which have been in force since
February 1, 2004. The tariff structure currently in place
also includes certain mechanisms to take into account structural
factors affecting distributors’ costs. In 2004, the Energy
Authority established a price equalizing mechanism intended to
minimize the effects of a timing discrepancy in the setting of
prices distributors pay to the Single Buyer for electricity to
be distributed on the regulated market and the prices that
distributors may charge to end users on the regulated market.
The prices distributors pay to the Single Buyer for electricity
to be distributed on the regulated market are set monthly by the
Energy Authority based on the average unit costs incurred by the
Single Buyer in connection with its purchases of electricity.
However, the generation component included in the overall tariff
that distributors may charge to end users on the regulated
market is fixed by the Energy Authority on a quarterly basis. In
order to minimize the effects of this discrepancy, the Energy
Authority has established a price equalizing mechanism
applicable for the first time in 2004. The equalizing mechanism
will be funded through a system charge in an amount set by the
Energy Authority, applicable in 2005.
In 2004, the Energy Authority also put in place a system to
compensate distributors that serve areas where costs are
significantly higher than the national average due to
uncontrollable factors such as population density and geography.
The costs to be considered in setting this compensation are to
be based on
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS — (Continued)
infrastructural elements such as the length of cables and
installation type (aerial or underground), but have not yet been
fixed. The Energy Authority is currently in the process of
determining which distributors are to be compensated under this
system, and the amount of each distributor’s compensation.
Increased Competition
For many years the Company has had virtually no competition in
the generation, transmission and distribution of electricity
market in Italy. The Company currently faces competition from
independent power producers and municipal utilities in
generation.
In addition, the disposal of the Gencos has exposed the Company
to increasing competition from other operators of electricity
generating capacity, including Italian and international power
companies.
The Company also faces competition from suppliers and
wholesalers for sales to customers that are intensive users of
electricity and may freely purchase electricity from different
producers.
In addition to the introduction on April 1, 2004, of
trading on the Italian power exchange, the Company expects that
competition will increase further due to:
•
An increase in bilateral contracts between its competitors and
final customers;
•
Regulations limiting each operator’s access to
international electricity sources to a maximum percentage of
available interconnection capacity; and
•
The construction of new generation facilities by its competitors
and the development of new interconnection lines that would
increase the volume of electricity that may be imported in Italy.
Basis of Presentation
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with
Italian GAAP, along with the reconciliation to U.S. GAAP,
requires management to make certain estimates and assumptions
that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of
the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues
and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could
differ from those estimates.
(b)
EUFR Acquisition
On June 16, 2003, ENEL and Uniòn Fenosa signed an
agreement for the acquisition by ENEL of 80% of Uniòn
Fenosa Energìas Especiales (EUFR), a company that groups
the activities of the Spanish operator in the field of energy
produced from renewable resources for
euro 178 million, while Uniòn Fenosa holds a call
option on 30% of the shares expiring at the end of 2007.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS — (Continued)
The following table summarizes the fair value of the assets
acquired and liabilities assumed, on a U.S. GAAP basis, at
the date of acquisition:
Millions of euro
Current assets
46
Fixed assets, net
168
Goodwill
123
Other non-current assets
39
Total assets acquired
376
Current liabilities
(47
)
Long-term debt
(135
)
Minority interest
(14
)
Other non-current liabilities
(2
)
Total liabilities assumed
(198
)
Net assets acquired
178
The acquisition was treated as a purchase. For U.S. GAAP
purposes the goodwill is assigned to the Generation and Energy
Management sector and it is not amortized.
(c)
WIND Acquisition
On March 20, 2003, ENEL reached an agreement for the
acquisition of the 26.6% share in WIND’s capital stock held
by the France Telecom Group (France Telecom), thus achieving the
full ownership of WIND. The price paid was
euro 1,389 million and the purchase agreement included
the cancellation of the call option held by France Telecom
giving France Telecom the right to increase its share in WIND to
44%. The agreement provides for payments of additional
consideration to France Telecom in case ENEL should sell WIND
shares before December 31, 2004 receiving a cash price per
share higher than that paid by ENEL to France Telecom. The
transfer of the shares and the payment of the price, in addition
to the transfer of the euro 175 million subordinated
loan, took place on July 1, 2003.
The following table summarizes the fair value of the assets
acquired and liabilities assumed, on a U.S. GAAP basis, at
the date of acquisition:
Millions of euro
Current assets
395
Fixed assets, net
922
Goodwill
855
Intangible assets
595
Other non-current assets
1,284
Total assets acquired
4,051
Current liabilities
(622
)
Long-term debt
(1,855
)
Minority interest
(7
)
Other non-current liabilities
(178
)
Total liabilities assumed
(2,662
)
Net assets acquired
1,389
The acquisition was accounted for as a purchase. Of the
euro 595 million acquired intangible assets,
euro 408 million was assigned to brands which are
determined to have an indefinite useful life and therefore
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS — (Continued)
are not amortized, euro 103 million was assigned to
customer relationships and is being amortized over 5 years,
deemed to be appropriate based on estimated customer turnover,
and euro 84 million was assigned to the GSM license
and is being amortized over the residual duration of the license
(which will expire in 2018). The resulting goodwill of
euro 855 million was assigned to the
Telecommunications Division. The minority interest represents
third parties interests in a subsidiary of WIND.
(d)
Maritza Acquisition
On March 5, 2003, as part of the program aimed at expansion
of its international operations, the Company acquired 60% of the
share capital of the Dutch company Entergy Power Holding Maritza
BV, which in turn controls 73% of the Bulgarian company Maritza
East III Power Company AD. The latter will carry out the
refurbishment and environmental upgrade of a lignite-fired
generation plant located in Bulgaria.
The following table summarizes the fair value of the assets
acquired and liabilities assumed, on a U.S. GAAP basis, at
the date of acquisition:
Millions of euro
Current assets
95
Fixed assets, net
57
Goodwill
28
Other non-current assets
9
Total assets acquired
189
Current liabilities
(53
)
Long-term debt
—
Minority interest
(61
)
Other non-current liabilities
—
Total liabilities assumed
(114
)
Net assets acquired
75
The acquisition was accounted for as a purchase. The resulting
goodwill of euro 28 million is assigned to the
Generation and Energy Management sector and it is not amortized.
(e)
Viesgo Acquisition
On January 8, 2002, as part of the program aimed at
expansion of its international operations, the Company acquired
100% of the share capital of Electra de Viesgo SL, the holding
company of the Viesgo Group, the fourth largest electricity
operator in Spain, for euro 1,920 million in cash.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS — (Continued)
The following table summarizes the fair value of the assets
acquired and liabilities assumed, on a U.S. GAAP basis, at
the date of acquisition:
Millions of euro
Current assets
252
Fixed assets, net
1,421
Goodwill
757
Other non-current assets
123
Total assets acquired
2,553
Current liabilities
(457
)
Long-term debt
(12
)
Minority interest
(19
)
Other non-current liabilities
(145
)
Total liabilities assumed
(633
)
Net assets acquired
1,920
The acquisition was accounted for as a purchase. The resulting
goodwill of euro 757 million was assigned to the
Generation and Energy Management sector. Minority interest
relates to certain Viesgo subsidiaries.
(f)
Camuzzi Acquisition
On May 23, 2002, consistent with its strategy to expand its
operations in the natural gas distribution and sales activities,
the Company purchased 98.81% of the share capital of Camuzzi
Gazometri SpA, the second largest distributor of natural gas in
Italy, for euro 1,045 million in cash.
The following table summarizes the fair value of the assets
acquired and liabilities assumed, on a U.S. GAAP basis, at
the date of acquisition:
Millions of euro
Current assets
479
Fixed assets, net
866
Intangible assets
632
Other non-current assets
98
Total assets acquired
2,075
Current liabilities
(658
)
Long-term debt
(228
)
Minority interest
(2
)
Other non-current liabilities
(142
)
Total liabilities assumed
(1,030
)
Net assets acquired
1,045
The acquisition was accounted for as a purchase. Of the
euro 632 million of acquired intangible assets,
euro 566 million was assigned to customer
relationships and is being amortized over a period of
15 years, deemed to be appropriate in view of estimated
customer turnover, and euro 66 million was assigned to
the licenses for the distribution of gas and is being amortized
over the duration of the license of 9 years. If the license
is not renewed, the customer relationship continues to exist
even though the license is held by another party.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS — (Continued)
(g)
2004 acquisitions
In 2004, ENEL acquired the following entities, by sector, for a
total cost of
€150 million:
-Gas sector
•
Sicilmetano and Sicilmetano Energy, based in Catania, Italy,
operating in the distribution and sale of natural gas to end
customers, merged into Enel Rete Gas S.p.A. and Enel Gas S.p.A.,
respectively, effective January 1, 2004 (100% share
interest acquired);
•
Ottogas Rete S.r.l. and Ottogas Vendita S.r.l., based in Milan,
Italy, operating in the distribution and sale of natural gas to
end customers (100% share interest acquired);
•
Italgestioni Gas S.r.l. and Italgestioni S.r.l., based in
Bologna, Italy, operating in the distribution and sale of
natural gas to end customers (100% share interest acquired);
-Generation and Energy Management sector
•
Sistemas Energeticos Manon Ortigueira SA, based in Ortigueira,
Spain, operating in the renewable resource electricity
generation sector (86% share acquired);
•
certain generation companies, based in North America, operating
in the renewable resource electricity generation sector;
-Other activities
•
Water & Industrial Services Company S.p.A., based in
Monza, Italy, a provider of refluent water softening services
(51% share interest acquired);
All of the acquisitions were accounted for as purchases. Of the
total price paid, euro 21 million was assigned to
customer relationships, relates to Sales, Infrastructures and
networks, and is being amortized over 15 years, deemed
appropriate based on the estimated customer turnover. No other
intangible assets were acquired.
Goodwill resulting from the acquisitions amounted to
euro 22 million, is fully deductible for tax purposes,
and was assigned euro 7 million to Generation and
Energy Management, euro 8 million to Sales,
Infrastructures and networks and euro 7 million to Other
activities.
(h)
Accounting for Income Taxes
Income taxes are accounted for under the assets and liability
method. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for
the future tax consequences attributable to differences between
the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and
liabilities and their respective tax bases and operating loss
and tax credit carryforwards. Deferred tax assets and
liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to
apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary
differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect
on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates
is recognized in income in the period that includes the
enactment date.
All but an insignificant amount of income before tax and tax
expense is from Italian sources.
A detail of the provision for income taxes under U.S. GAAP
for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 is as
follows:
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS — (Continued)
The difference between the statutory and effective tax rate for
the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, is due to
the following factors:
2004
2003
2002
Normal tax rate(a)
44
%
45
%
47.0
%
Change in tax rates
—
(0.5
)
(1.7
)
Reversal of net deferred tax provision
(28.4
)
—
(2.7
)
Capital gains (not taxable in 2004 or subject to a
19% substitute tax in 2003 and 2004)
(15.3
)
(4.3
)
(65.4
)
Increase in valuation allowance
—
—
40.1
Non-deductible goodwill impairment
60.1
—
—
Other differences
(3.6
)
(0.8
)
(2.2
)
Effective tax rate
56.8
%
39.4
%
15.1
%
(a)
See note 22 for the definition of normal tax rate.
The components of the deferred tax assets
(liabilities) under U.S. GAAP as of December 31,2004 and 2003 are as follows:
2004
2003
2004
(millions of
(millions of euro)
U.S. dollars)
Deferred tax assets:
Other post retirement benefits accounting
376
371
508
Assets write-downs
377
189
510
Provision for litigation and contingent liabilities
658
646
891
Tax loss carryforwards
1,500
1,513
2,031
Customers’ connection fees
550
368
745
Revaluation of utility plant
—
117
—
Deferred Income
220
—
298
Other
479
375
648
Total deferred tax assets
4,160
3,579
5,631
Valuation allowances
(595
)
(572
)
(805
)
Total deferred tax assets, net
3,565
3,007
4,826
Deferred tax liabilities:
Revaluation of utility plant
(222
)
—
(300
)
Accelerated depreciation of utility plant
(2,087
)
(1,663
)
(2,825
)
Capitalization of interest on utility plant
(465
)
(477
)
(629
)
Equity reserves
(581
)
(572
)
(787
)
Goodwill impairment and amortization
—
(76
)
—
Other
(356
)
(383
)
(483
)
Total deferred tax liabilities
(3,711
)
(3,171
)
(5,024
)
Net deferred tax liabilities
(146
)
(164
)
(198
)
Net deferred tax assets on tax loss carryforwards as of
December 31, 2004 of euro 905 million primarily
relate to WIND for euro 779 million, Enel Rete Gas for
euro 46 million and to Viesgo Generation for
euro 40 million and are stated net of a valuation
allowance of euro 595 million, of which euro
596 million related to WIND.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS — (Continued)
There was no valuation allowance recognized as of January 1,2002. During the years ending December 31, 2002, 2003 and
2004, the valuation allowance increased by
euro 269 million, euro 303 million and
euro 23 million, respectively.
The tax loss carryforwards as of December 31, 2004 expire
as follows:
•
2006: euro 377 million;
•
2007: euro 143 million;
•
2008: euro 637 million;
•
2009: euro 379 million;
•
no limits: euro 545 million.
There are no deferred tax liabilities not recognized with
respect to investments in foreign subsidiaries.
As of December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively, income tax
has been allocated to each item in Other Comprehensive Income as
follows:
2004
2003
(millions of
euro)
Minimum Pension Liabilities
(21
)
(17
)
Derivatives
25
5
Investments in equity securities
(3
)
1
There is no difference between Italian GAAP and U.S. GAAP
in the classification of deferred tax assets and liabilities.
In assessing the realizability of deferred tax assets,
management considers whether it is more likely than not that
some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be
realized. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is
dependent upon the generation of future taxable income during
the periods in which those temporary differences become
deductible and tax loss carryforwards utilized. Management
considers the scheduled reversal of deferred tax liabilities,
projected future taxable income, and tax planning strategies in
making this assessment. Based upon the level of historical
taxable income and projections for future taxable income over
the periods in which the deferred tax assets are deductible,
management believes it is more likely than not that the Company
will realize the benefits of these deductible differences and
tax carryforwards, net of the existing valuation allowances at
December 31, 2004. The amount of the deferred tax asset
considered realizable, however, could be reduced in the near
term if estimates of future taxable income during the
carryforward period are reduced.
(i)
Segment Information
To support the strategy to refocus on the core energy business,
in July 2002, the Company reorganized its operations into six
business divisions in order to increase the focus of the
activities on the market and to better control costs and enhance
synergies among the Company’s various subsidiaries. These
divisions were: Generation and Energy Management; Sales,
Infrastructure and Networks; Transmission; Telecommunications;
Services and Other Activities and Corporate. In 2003, the
Company added a seventh division called International. In 2004,
management decided to re-allocate to other segments the
operations that had previously been grouped in the International
division. The Company’s reportable segments are now
Generation and Energy Management, Sales, Infrastructure and
Networks, Transmission, Telecommunications, Corporate and
Services and Other Activities. In addition, on December 31,2003, the Transmission segment acquired from the Services and
Other Activities segment, the Brazilian transmission grid
operators, the results of which since January 1, 2004, have
therefore been included in the Transmission segment. In order to
present segment information for each of the years ended
December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 on a comparable basis,
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS — (Continued)
certain segment information for the years ended
December 31, 2003 and 2002 has been reclassified to conform
to the 2004 presentation. Each division has its own management
structure, headed by a senior manager who reports directly to
the Chief Executive Officer of ENEL.
The Generation and Energy Management Division is responsible for
operations related to the production of electricity and the
procurement of fuel for electricity generated. The key
subsidiaries in this division include in Italy Enel Produzione
S.p.A., for energy generation; Enel Green Power S.p.A., for
energy generation from renewable sources; and Enel Trade S.p.A.,
which purchases fuel for all of ENELs’ generating
operations and is active in the fuel trading and logistics
sector. The Division also includes Viesgo Generaciòn S.L.,
and Uniòn Fenosa Energias Especiales in Spain, Enel North
America Inc. in the U.S., Enel Latin America LLC, in Central and
South America, and Maritza East III Power Company AD in
Bulgaria.
The Sales, Infrastructure and Networks Division comprises two
business units, which operate as independent units under the
umbrella of Enel Distribuzione S.p.A., the division’s lead
company. The Infrastructure and Networks business unit operates
mainly through Enel Distribuzione S.p.A., which distributes
electricity in Italy. The Sales business unit sells electricity
and gas and provides electricity-related services. The key
subsidiaries in this business unit include in Italy Enel
Distribuzione S.p.A., which sells electricity on the regulated
market in Italy; Enel Energia S.p.A., which sells electricity on
the free market in Italy; Enel Rete Gas S.p.A. which owns the
gas distribution networks and the related license for their use;
Enel Gas S.p.A., which resells natural gas to end users in
Italy; Enel So.l.e. S.p.A., which offers public and art lighting
services; and Enel.si S.p.A. which offers electricity
systems-related services and “beyond the meter”
products and services, such as consulting and sale of electrical
equipment. The Division also includes Viesgo Distribuciòn
S.L. and Viesgo Energia S.L. in Spain.
Terna S.p.A., constituting the Transmission Division, owns
approximately 94% of Italy’s national transmission grid.
Furthermore, the Division includes Novatrans Energia SA and
Transmissora Sudeste Nordeste SA, owners and operators of two
high voltage distribution lines in Brazil.
The Telecommunications Division’s operations are carried
out by WIND.
ENEL constitutes the Corporate Division and, as the Parent,
defines the strategic objectives for ENEL and coordinates the
activities of all the divisions. In addition, ENEL manages
finance operations and insurance risk coverage for all ENEL
companies and provides assistance and guidelines on
organizational, industrial relations, accounting,
administrative, tax and legal issues.
The Services and Other Activities Division includes other
non-core business operations, such as, among others, Enel
Facility Management S.p.A. (formerly Enel Real Estate S.p.A) and
NewReal S.p.A. (in June 2004, the Company agreed to sell this
company for euro 1,400 million) which operated in real
estate management services; Enelpower S.p.A., which provides
power-related engineering and construction services; and Enel.it
S.p.A., the group-wide information technology unit.
Individually, none of these other activities met the
quantitative thresholds for determining reportable segments in
the periods covered by these Consolidated Financial Statements
and therefore have been grouped for purposes of segment
reporting.
The accounting policies of the segments are the same as those
described as significant accounting policies (Note 2). No
geographic information has been presented since foreign
operations represent approximately 6%, 6% and 5% of total
revenues for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and
2002, respectively, and approximately 5% of total assets as of
December 31, 2004 and 2003.
Considering the aforementioned segment redefinition which
occurred in 2003 and 2004, the segment information for prior
years has been restated for comparative purposes.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS — (Continued)
Information about the Company’s segments, prepared in
accordance with Italian GAAP, for the years ended
December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004 is as follows:
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS — (Continued)
The Company’s segment information, prepared in accordance
with U.S. GAAP, for the years ended December 31, 2004,
2003 and 2002 presented below has been restated to reflect the
differences between the Company’s accounting policies under
Italian GAAP and U.S. GAAP.
Services
Generation
Sales,
and
and energy
infrastructures
other
management
and networks
Transmission
Telecom.
Corporate
activities
Eliminations
Consolidated
(millions of euro)
2002
Revenues
12,395
828
21,425
3,967
1,973
2,971
(12,955
)
30,604
Operating Income
1,176
1,440
230
(2,839
)
158
(107
)
(54
)
4
Depreciation and Amortization
1,222
1,548
230
930
1
138
—
4,069
Capital Expenditures(1)
1,021
1,900
423
1,550
—
250
—
5,144
Identifiable Assets
23,167
21,993
4,567
15,286
7,616
8,044
(14,250
)
66,423
2003
Revenues
12,194
927
20,596
4,401
1,186
2,847
(10,914
)
31,237
Operating Income
2,333
1,805
426
(377
)
245
260
(80
)
4,612
Depreciation and Amortization
1,303
1,626
147
1,199
7
224
—
4,506
Capital Expenditures(1)
864
1,665
371
685
—
73
—
3,658
Identifiable Assets
22,958
23,060
4,779
10,035
29,612
16,899
(38,814
)
68,530
2004
Revenues
12,318
19,466
1,023
4,494
1,062
1,841
(5,112
)
35,092
Operating Income
2,485
2,531
475
(3,404
)
1,351
361
(94
)
3,706
Depreciation and Amortization
1,286
1,043
168
1,242
4
114
—
3,857
Capital Expenditures(1)
871
1,632
277
680
—
87
—
3,547
Identifiable Assets
21,332
22,257
4,893
12,340
12,699
7,726
(14,095
)
67,152
(millions
of U.S. Dollars)
2004
Revenues
16,676
26,353
1,385
6,084
1,438
2,492
(6,921
)
47,508
Operating Income
3,365
3,426
643
(4,608
)
1,829
489
(127
)
5,017
Depreciation and Amortization
1,741
1,413
227
1,681
5
154
—
5,222
Capital Expenditures(1)
1,179
2,209
375
921
—
118
—
4,802
Identifiable Assets
28,880
30,132
6,624
16,705
17,192
10,460
(19,082
)
90,910
(1)
Tangible assets.
(j)
Earnings per Share
In accordance with SFAS No. 128, “Earnings per
Share”, basic earnings per share is computed by dividing
income available to common shareholders by the weighted average
number of common shares outstanding. The number of shares
included in the computation of diluted earnings per share is
increased to include the effect, if dilutive, of any potentially
issuable common shares. Potentially issuable shares include
options, warrants, and convertible securities. For the year
ended December 31, 2002, the Company had no dilutive
potential common shares, therefore basic and diluted earnings
per share were equal. For the year ended December 31, 2004
and 2003, the Company had dilutive common shares resulting from
outstanding stock options with a potentially dilutive effect.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS — (Continued)
The computation of basic and diluted earnings per share for the
years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, in accordance
with U.S. GAAP, are as follows:
Basic and Diluted EPS
2004
2003
2002
2004
(millions of
(millions of Euro)(*)
U.S. dollars)(*)
Income available to common shareholders
1,031
2,376
1,399
1,395
Weighted average shares — basic (in millions)
6,087
6,063
6,063
6,087
Weighted average shares — diluted (in millions)
6,215
6,063
6,063
6,215
Earnings per share-basic:
0.17
0.39
0.23
0.23
Earnings per share-diluted:
0.17
0.39
0.23
0.23
(*)
Except per-share data which is in euro and U.S. dollars.
(k) Fair Value of Financial Instruments
As required by SFAS No. 107, “Disclosures about
Fair Value of Financial Instruments”, the Company has
estimated the fair values of its financial instruments held.
In the normal course of its business, the Company utilizes
various types of financial instruments. These instruments
include recorded assets and liabilities, as well as items that
principally involve off-balance sheet risks. Information about
the fair value of the Company’s financial instruments is
presented below.
•
Cash and cash equivalents: the carrying values of cash and cash
equivalents approximate their fair values because of their short
maturities.
•
Investments in equity securities classified as available for
sale: the carrying value of such investments reflects their fair
value as of the balance sheet date.
•
Short-term debt: the carrying value of short-term debt
approximates fair value because of the short period of time
between the origination and maturity of the borrowings.
•
Other noncurrent assets: the carrying value of such assets
reflects their fair value as of the balance sheet date.
•
Bonds payable-listed: the fair value of bonds payable-listed is
based upon period-end market prices.
•
Other bonds and long-term debt (including current maturities):
the fair values of other bonds and long-term debt (including
current maturities) are based on discounted cash flow analyses.
Other bonds and long-term debt, including current maturities
13,996
13,987
14,236
14,085
Derivative financial instruments: the fair value of derivatives
generally reflects the estimated amounts that the Company would
pay or receive to terminate the contracts at the reporting date,
thereby taking into account the current unrealized gains or
losses of open contracts. Appropriate pricing models and current
market input data (such as volatility, interest rate curves and
foreign exchange rates) have been used to estimate the fair
value of the Company’s derivatives.
contracts with a notional amount of euro 855 million
used to hedge the foreign exchange risk related to fuel
purchases, electricity imports and expected cash flows in
currencies other than the euro (euro 1,681 million as of
December 31, 2003); and
•
contracts with a notional amount of euro 715 million
used to hedge the foreign exchange risk related to the repayment
of the commercial paper issued in foreign currency
(euro 440 as of December 31, 2003).
The Company generally enters into these contracts with respect
to the same amount and date of the repayment obligation or the
cash flow that the Company expects to generate, thus any change
in fair value of these contracts deriving from a possible
appreciation or depreciation of the euro against other
currencies would be fully offset by a corresponding change in
the fair value of the underlying position.
At the end of 2004, the Company also had in place
euro 215 million of foreign exchange forward contracts
(euro 153 million at December 31, 2003) and
euro 85 million of options (euro 110 million
at December 31, 2003) used to hedge any residual foreign
exchange risk on an aggregate basis.
Interest rate derivatives used by the Company mainly consist of
interest rate swaps, forward rate agreements, interest rate
collars and swaptions, in order to lock in a fixed interest rate
to balance the fix/floating ratio of its long-term debt.
The Company’s derivative financial instruments were
recorded in the Italian GAAP financial statements at carrying
amounts of euro 18 million and
euro 38 million as of December 31, 2004 and 2003,
respectively.
(l)
Effects of Regulation
As discussed in Note 3, the Company is subject to the
regulatory control of the Energy Authority with additional
oversight provided by numerous laws, decrees and codes. The
current regulatory tariff structure provides the Company with
recovery of certain levels of cost through a price cap
framework, and not necessarily its specific cost of providing
service. Accordingly, SFAS No. 71, “Accounting
for the Effects of Certain Types of Regulation”, which
relates to an entity whose rates are regulated on an actual cost
basis, is not currently applicable to these Consolidated
Financial Statements.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS — (Continued)
(n)
Stock-Based Compensation
The Company accounts for all stock-based compensation issued
under the provision and related interpretation of Accounting
Principles Board Opinion (“APB”) No. 25,
“Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees”. In
accordance with SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for
Stock-Based Compensation”, the Company intends to continue
to apply APB No. 25 for purposes of determining net income
and to present the pro forma disclosures required by
SFAS No. 123 as amended by SFAS No. 148
“Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation —
Transition and Disclosure an amendment of FASB Statement
No. 123”.
In 2000, following the authorization obtained in an ENEL
Shareholders’ meeting, the Company launched the “Stock
Option Plan” (tranche 2000) of which 5,513,200 was still
outstanding as of January 1, 2001. In 2001, the Company
granted a second tranche of options under the plan
(Tranche 2001) for additional 34,274,050 options. This
tranche’s options vest if certain target prices, or other
criteria, are met. Since certain targets were not achieved, a
portion of the options were forfeited. The status of the stock
options granted under the Stock Option Plan, as of
December 31, 2001, was as follows:
The average fair value of options granted during 2001 was
approximately euro 0.48 per share. The fair value of each
option grant is estimated using a standard Black-Scholes
option-pricing model with the following weighted-average
assumption used for estimating fair value:
Tranche 2001
Future dividends per share
euro 0.36
Risk-free interest rate
4.05%
Expected life
2.5 years
Expected volatility
27%
In 2002, following the authorization obtained in a ENEL
Shareholders’ meeting, the Parent launched a new
“Stock Option Plan”, granting to certain of its
executive 41,748,500 options. Among the beneficiaries of the
2002 stock-option plan, in their capacity as General Manager,
were also those who held, at different times, the position of
ENEL’s Chief Executive Officer during that year.
Options under this plan vested if earnings before interest,
taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA), of ENEL for the
fiscal year 2002 exceeded the estimated EBITDA as indicated in
the budget approved by the Board of Directors, and if the price
of ENEL shares on Telematico outperformed a specified reference
index over the same period. If either of these conditions were
not met, all the options expire. In March 2003, the
Company’s Board of Directors determined that the conditions
for all the options to vest had been satisfied. In previous
plans, exercise conditions did not include performance targets
such as EBITDA and were mainly related to target prices of ENEL
shares.
2,503,500 granted to Enel’s Chief Executive Officer at
euro 6.480.
The average fair value of options granted during 2002 was
approximately euro 0.17 per share. The fair value of each
option grant is estimated using a standard Black-Scholes
option-pricing model with the following weighted-average
assumption used for estimating fair value:
Future dividends per share
Euro 0.28
Risk-free interest rate
2.82%
Expected life
2.0 years
Expected volatility
28%
In 2003, following the authorization obtained in a ENEL
Shareholders’ meeting, the Parent launched a new
“Stock Option Plan”, granting to certain of its
executive 47,624,005 options. Among the beneficiaries of the
2003 stock-option plan, in their capacity as General Manager,
were also those who held, at different times, the position of
ENEL’s Chief Executive Officer during that year.
This plan is based on conditions similar to the 2002 plan. In
March 2004, the Company’s Board of Directors determined
that the condition for all the options to vest had been
satisfied.
The status of the stock options granted under the Stock Option
Plan, as of December 31, 2003, was as follows:
4,200,000 granted to Enel’s Chief Executive Officer at
euro 5.240.
The average fair value of options granted during 2003 was
approximately euro 0.67 per share. The fair value of each
option granted is estimated using a Black-Scholes option-pricing
model with the following weighted-average assumption used for
estimating fair value:
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS — (Continued)
In 2004, following the authorization obtained in a ENEL
Shareholders’ meeting, the Parent launched a new
“Stock Option Plan”, granting to certain of its
executive 38,527,550 options. Among the beneficiaries of the
2004 stock-option plan, in their capacity as General Manager,
was also those who held the position of ENEL’s Chief
Executive Officer during that year.
This plan is based on conditions similar to the 2003 plan. In
March 2005, the Company’s Board of Directors determined
that the condition for all the options to vest had been
satisfied.
The average fair value of options granted during 2004 was
approximately euro 0.18 per share. The fair value of each
option granted is estimated using a Black-Scholes option-pricing
model with the following weighted-average assumption used for
estimating fair value:
Future dividends per share
Euro 0.36
Weighted average risk-free interest rate
2.72%
Expected life
3.5 years
Expected volatility
17%
In 2004, ENEL’s Board of Directors awarded to all option
holders, a cash bonus of euro 0.41 due upon exercise of stock
options.
The status of the stock options granted under the Stock Option
Plan, as of December 31, 2004, was as follows:
2,500,000 granted to Enel’s Chief Executive Officer at
euro 6.242.
(**)
Price has been reduced by euro 0.41, as discussed above.
The following table summarizes certain information for the
options granted by the Parent, outstanding at December 31,2004:
Options Outstanding
Options exercisable
Weighted
average
Weighted
Weighted
Weighted
Range of
remaining
average
average
average
Fair
Tranche
Grant Prices
options
grant life
grant price
grant options
Price
value
(euro)
(years)
(euro)
(euro)
(euro)
2001
6.86
16,690,142
0.5
6.86
16,690,142
7.27
0.48
2002
6.02
12,819,944
1.5
6.02
2,707,944
6.43
0.17
2003
4.83
28,044,186
2.5
4.83
1,384,539
5.24
0.67
2004
5.83
37,296,550
3.5
—
—
—
0.183
In 2001, WIND launched a Stock Option Plan on WIND shares.
Options under this plan were scheduled to vest and would have
been available for exercise starting in 2002 if certain targets
were met, or other criteria were met during 2002 and WIND’s
proposed IPO was executed before September 2003. Since these
conditions were not met, the options expired in 2003.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS — (Continued)
The Company’s pro forma earnings for the years ended
December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, had compensation costs,
relating to the plan launched by the Parent and its subsidiary
WIND, recorded in accordance with SFAS No. 123, as
amended by SFAS No. 148, are presented below (millions
of euro):
2004
2003
2002
Net income in accordance with U.S. GAAP, as reported
1,031
2,376
1,399
Stock-based employee compensation expense, as reported
139
—
—
Stock-based employee compensation expense under fair value
(122
)
(12
)
(6
)
Pro forma net income
1,048
2,364
1,393
The Company’s pro forma earnings per share for the years
ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, had compensation
costs, relating to the plan launched by the Parent and its
subsidiary WIND, recorded in accordance with
SFAS No. 123, as amended by SFAS No. 148,
are presented below:
2004
2003
2002
As Reported
Pro Forma
As Reported
Pro Forma
As Reported
Pro Forma
Basic and diluted earnings per share
0.17
0.17
0.39
0.39
0.23
0.23
The effects of applying SFAS No. 123 in this pro forma
disclosure should not be interpreted as being indicative of
future effects.
(o)
Pension and Other Post-Retirement Benefit Costs
Certain employees of ENEL are covered under pension plans, which
allow for retirement benefits based upon compensation and years
of service (see Notes 2 and 11). In accordance with
SFAS No. 87, the Company accrues the amount due to
each employee at year-end based upon these dates and certain
assumptions.
Certain employees of ENEL are also covered under certain other
post-retirement benefit plans (see Note 2). In accordance
with SFAS No. 106, the Company accrues the amount due
to each employee at year-end based upon these dates and certain
assumptions.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS — (Continued)
Amounts recognized in the consolidated balance sheet consist of:
Other Post-
Pension benefits
retirement benefits
2004
2003
2004
2003
(millions of euro)
(millions of euro)
Prepaid benefit cost
—
—
—
—
Accrued benefit cost
(1,616
)
(1,782
)
(1,168
)
(1,149
)
Intangible assets
—
—
—
—
Accumulated other comprehensive income
277
344
—
—
Net amount recognized
(1,339
)
(1,438
)
(1,168
)
(1,149
)
The accumulated benefit obligation for pension plans and other
postretirement plans at December 31, 2004, was
euro 1,735 million and euro 1,189 million,
respectively. The accumulated benefit obligation for pension
plans and other postretirement plans at December 31, 2003,
was euro 1,850 million and
euro 1,108 million, respectively.
Other Post-
Pensions benefits
retirement benefits
2004
2003
2002
2004
2003
2002
(millions of euro)
Components of Net Periodic Benefit Cost:
Service cost
102
84
89
12
10
13
Interest cost
98
101
102
56
56
52
Expected return on plan assets
(7
)
(6
)
(5
)
(1
)
(1
)
—
Net amortization and deferral
17
16
20
—
—
—
Net periodic benefit cost
210
195
206
67
65
65
Curtailment gain/initial accrual
—
—
75
—
—
—
Special withdrawal
68
—
—
—
—
—
Adjustment
15
13
—
2
—
—
Total cost accrual
293
208
281
69
65
65
Additional Information
Other Post-
Pension benefits
retirement benefits
2004
2003
2004
2003
(millions of euro)
(millions of euro)
Increase in minimum liability included in
other comprehensive income
67
61
—
—
Assumptions
Other Post-
Pensions benefits
retirement benefits
2004
2003
2004
2003
Weighted Average Assumptions used to determine benefit
obligations as of December 31:
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS — (Continued)
Other Post-
Pensions benefits
retirement benefits
2004
2003
2002
2004
2003
2002
Weighted Average Assumptions used to determine net periodic
benefit cost for years ended December 31:
Discount rate
5.0%
5.0%
5.0%
5.0%
5.0%
5.0%
Expected long term rate of return on plan assets
5.0%
5.0%
5.0%
5.0%
5.0%
2.5%
Rate of compensation increase
3.5%
3.5%
3.5%
N/A
N/A
N/A
2004
2003
Assumed health care cost trend rates at December 31
Health care cost trend rate assumed for next year
3.0
%
3.5
%
Rate to which the cost trend rate is assumed to decline (the
ultimate trend rate)
3.0
%
3.5
%
Year that the rate reaches the ultimate trend rate
2005
2004
Assumed health care cost trend rates have a significant effect
on the amounts reported for the health care plans. A
one-percentage-point change in assumed health care cost trend
rates would have the following effects:
1- Percentage-
1- Percentage-
Point Increase
Point Decrease
(millions of euro)
Effect on total cost
1
(1
)
Effect on accumulated post-retirement benefit obligation
30
(24
)
ENEL pension plan and post-retirement plan assets, which solely
relate to certain Spanish subsidiaries, are entirely covered by
insurance contracts. Under the terms of the contract, the annual
yield is guaranteed by the insurance company and investment
decisions are the responsibility of the insurance company.
ENEL expects to contribute euro 104 million to its
pension plans and euro 55 million to its other
post-retirement benefit plans in 2005.
Estimated Future Benefit Payments
The following benefit payments, including benefits attributable
to estimated future employee service, are expected to be paid:
Pension
Other Post-
benefits
retirement benefits
(millions of euro)
2005
104
55
2006
118
57
2007
123
58
2008
150
60
2009
203
62
Years 2010-2014
1,335
323
(p)
Derivative Financial Instruments
Effective January 1, 2001, the Company adopted Statement of
Financial Accounting Standard No. 133
(“SFAS 133”), Accounting for Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities, which establishes accounting
and reporting standards for derivative instruments, including
certain derivative instruments embedded in other contracts
(embedded derivatives), and for hedging activities.
SFAS 133 requires that all derivatives, whether
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS — (Continued)
designated in hedging relationships or not, be recorded on the
balance sheet at fair value. The accounting for changes in fair
value of a derivative instrument depends on its intended use and
the resulting designation.
As of January 1, 2001, the Company classified for
U.S. GAAP purposes all of its derivative instruments into
different categories, for which the accounting are as follows:
•
For “cash flow hedges”, the effective portion of the
gain or loss from the derivative hedging instrument is
accumulated in other comprehensive income (“OCI”) and
recognized in earnings during the period that the hedged
forecasted transaction impacts earnings. The ineffective portion
of the gain or loss from the derivative hedging instrument is
recognized in earnings immediately.
•
For “fair value hedges”, the gain or loss on the
derivative instrument designated and qualifying as a fair value
hedging instrument as well as the offsetting loss or gain on the
hedged item attributable to the hedged risk is recognized
currently in earnings in the same accounting period.
•
For all other derivative contracts which do not qualify for the
special hedge accounting treatment under SFAS 133, gains
and losses are recorded in earnings each reporting period.
Under U.S. GAAP, a derivative instrument is defined as a
contract with all three of the following characteristics:
a.
It has (1) one or more underlying and (2) one or more
notional amounts or payment provisions or both.
b.
No initial net investment or an initial net investment that is
smaller than would be required for other types of contracts that
would be expected to have a similar response to changes in
market factors.
c.
Its terms require or permit net settlement, it can readily be
settled net by a means outside the contract, or it provides for
delivery of an asset that puts the recipient in a position not
substantially different from net settlement.
Since the adoption of SFAS 133, the Company implemented a
control to identify and, if necessary, recognize any potential
derivatives or embedded derivatives. The Company subjected all
significant contracts to such control and found that its
contracts do not require valuation under SFAS 133 and
related interpretations. Furthermore, through December 31,2004, no embedded derivatives were required to be separated from
the underlying obligation and carried at fair value.
Cash Flow Hedges
ENEL’s cash flow hedges primarily include hedges of certain
floating rate medium and long-term debt.
The Company has swapped these variable interest rate liabilities
into fixed interest rate liabilities. Interest rate swaps are
the most common type of derivative contract used to modify
exposure to interest rate risk by converting floating rate
liabilities to fixed rate liabilities. ENEL also enters into
Swaptions and Interest rate collars.
ENEL’s cash flow hedges also include hedges of fixed rate
medium and long-term foreign currency debt. In order to hedge
the variability of the foreign functional currency equivalent
cash flows on the liabilities ENEL has entered into combinations
of interest rate swaps to effectively switch the foreign fixed
interest rate debt into euro fixed interest debt. These
transactions must be viewed in combination and are designated
jointly as a hedging instrument.
In addition, the Company also enters into combinations of
interest rate swaps to switch the structured rate paid on
certain medium and long-term debt into fixed interest rate
outflows.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS — (Continued)
The breakdown of the hedging instruments, and the amounts
recognized in other comprehensive income (loss) are as follows:
Gains/
Gains/
Gains/
OCI at
losses
Reclassified
OCI at
losses
Reclassified
OCI at
losses
Reclassified
OCI at
December 31,
recorded
to earnings
December 31,
recorded
to earnings
December 31,
recorded
to earnings
December 31,
Type of operation
2001
in 2002
in 2002
2002
in 2003
in 2003
2003
in 2004
in 2004
2004
Interest rate swaps
(72
)
(201
)
3
(270
)
(29
)
14
(285
)
24
(106
)
(367
)
Interest rate collars
—
(4
)
—
(4
)
(3
)
—
(7
)
11
(5
)
(1
)
Swaptions
—
(2
)
—
(2
)
2
—
—
—
—
—
Total
(72
)
(207
)
3
(276
)
(30
)
14
(292
)
35
(111
)
(368
)
For each transaction, ENEL documents the hedging relationship,
the risk management objective and strategy for undertaking the
hedge, the nature of the risk being hedged, how ENEL measures
ineffectiveness, and how the hedging instrument’s
effectiveness in offsetting the exposure to changes in the
hedged item’s cash flows attributable to the hedged risk
will be assessed.
The Company assumes no ineffectiveness in the hedge
relationships that qualify for the short-cut method. For the
cash flow hedges that do not meet the requirements for use of
the short-cut method, ENEL formally assesses, both at the
inception of the hedge and on an ongoing basis, whether the
hedging derivatives are highly effective in offsetting changes
in cash flows of hedged items. All components of each
derivative’s gain or loss are included in the assessment of
hedge effectiveness. When it is determined that a derivative is
not highly effective as a hedge, the Company discontinues hedge
accounting and recognizes changes in fair value of these
contracts directly in earnings.
The total ineffectiveness recorded in earnings during the years
ended December 31, 2004 and 2003 amounts to euro
0.7 million and euro 0.1 million respectively.
For all cash flow hedges, ENEL recognizes all other changes in
fair value of the hedging instrument in other comprehensive
income and subsequently reclassifies them into earnings as the
hedged forecasted transaction impacts earnings.
The Company estimates that euro 106 million of net
derivative losses included in other comprehensive income as of
December 31, 2004 will be reclassified into earnings within
the next twelve months.
Fair Value Hedges
The Group’s fair value hedges consist of interest rate
swaps that are used to protect against changes in the fair value
of fixed-rate long-term debt due to changes in market interest
rates.
For the year ended December 31, 2004, the Group recognized
a net gain of euro 0.2 million, which represents the
ineffective portion of fair value hedges.
As at December 31, 2004, the fair value of outstanding
derivatives designated as fair value hedges was a
euro 39 million net positive replacement value.
The Company enters into other derivative contracts used to
mitigate the effects of crude oil, electricity, gas, foreign
currency and interest rate price fluctuations. The Company has
decided not to formally designate these contracts as hedges of
specific assets, liabilities, firm commitments or anticipated
transactions under the provisions of SFAS 133. Accordingly,
the Company records these contracts at fair value with all
changes in fair value being recorded as a component of income
from continuing operations during the period that such contracts
remain outstanding and, based on the guidance of SFAS 52,
remeasures foreign-currency-denominated liabilities related to
these contracts to spot exchange rates.
Derivative instruments are reported on a net-by-counterparty
basis on the Consolidated Balance Sheet when a legal right of
setoff exists under an enforceable netting agreement.
Accumulated amortization as of December 31, 2004 was
euro 129 million for customer relationship,
euro 28 million for licences, and
euro 32 million for the customer portfolio.
Accumulated amortization as of December 31, 2003 was
euro 70 million for customer relationship,
euro 15 million for licences, and
euro 18 million for the customer portfolio. In
addition, trademarks of euro 408 million, which are
not subject to amortization, are recorded as of
December 31, 2004 and 2003.
The estimated amortization of intangible assets, including
assets recorded under Italian GAAP, for each year in the period
from 2005 to 2009 amounts to approximately
euro 356 million, euro 185 million,
euro 197 million, euro 180 million and
euro 179 million, respectively.
(r)
Asset Retirement Obligations
ENEL has asset retirement obligations associated with a
geothermal power plant as well as a certain property owned by
the State. ENEL’s obligations relate to the return on
expiration of the license or authorization of such assets to the
State in same condition as originally conveyed. Additional asset
retirement obligations relate to WIND’s obligation to
dismantle antenna sites and return them to their original
condition.
Regarding ENEL’s other geothermal plants, generally, the
license or authorization is renewed, and no historical
experience exists of discontinuing a license or authorization.
The Company does not have sufficient information available to
estimate a range of potential settlement dates in which asset
retirement obligations relating to these plants will be
incurred. The liability will be initially recognized in the
period in which sufficient information exists to estimate a
range of potential settlement dates that is needed to employ a
present value technique to estimate fair value.
(s)
Cost method investments
The aggregate amount of all cost method investments at
December 31, 2004 and 2003, all evaluated for impairment,
was euro 38 million and euro 41 million,
respectively.
(t)
Variable interest entities
In January 2003, the FASB issued FIN 46,
“Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities
(VIE) — an interpretation of ARB No. 51,”
which clarifies the application of the consolidation rules to
certain variable interest entities. In December 2003, the FASB
issued a revised version of FIN 46 (FIN 46R) to
address certain technical corrections and implementation issues.
FIN 46R provides that if an entity is the primary
beneficiary of a VIE, the assets, liabilities, and results of
operations of the VIE should be consolidated in the
entity’s financial statements. Based on the guidance in
FIN 46R, ENEL concluded that FCC Eolo, an entity involved
in the securitization of WIND’s trade accounts receivable,
is a VIE and that WIND is the primary beneficiary. Accordingly,
ENEL began consolidating FCC Eolo’s financial results
January 1, 2004. The consolidation of FCC Eolo does not
impact consolidated net income or shareholders’ equity,
however, the consolidation of FCC Eolo increased ENEL’s
consolidated assets and liabilities by
euro 600 million.
In addition, based on the guidance in FIN 46R, ENEL
concluded that Excelsia Nove S.r.l., an entity which holds real
estate previously owned by ENEL through its subsidiary NewReal,
is a VIE and that ENEL is not the primarily benificiary. NewReal
was sold by ENEL on July 14, 2004, to Excelsia Otto S.r.l.
who subsequently transferred the real estate to Excelsia Nove
S.r.l.. In conjuction with the sale, certain real estate was
leased back to ENEL. ENEL’s maximum exposure to loss as a
results of its involvement in Excelsia Nove S.r.l. consists of
subordinated debt of euro 75 million as of
December 31, 2004.
(27)
SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
(a)
Acquisition of an Electricity Generation Company in
Slovakia
In conjunction with the strategy of international expansion, on
February 17, 2005, ENEL signed a contract for the
acquisition, for euro 840 million, of 66% of the share
capital of Slovenske Elektrarne (SE), the largest electricity
generator in Slovakia and the second largest in Central and
Eastern Europe.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS — (Continued)
(b)
Sale of Distribution Network in Modena
On February 18, 2005, in connection with legislative decree
79/99, ENEL signed an agreement with Meta SpA for the transfer
to Meta SpA of the business division concerning the distribution
and sale of electricity in 18 municipalities of the province of
Modena, for a price of euro 127 million. The sale is
expected to close before the end of 2005.
(c)
Transfer of certain activities from Gestore della Rete di
Transmissione Nazionale SpA (GRTN) to Terna
On February 28, 2005, Terna and GRTN, in accordance with
the provisions outlined by the Presidential Decree dated
May 11, 2004, signed an agreement for the transfer to
Terna, GRTN’s dispatching, planning and development
activities. The price agreed for the transfer of activities is
euro 68.3 million, and the assumption of approximately
Euro 112 million of trade payables due to Terna. The
effective date of the reunification of ownership and management
of the national transmission grid is subject to the approval of
the Antitrust Authority.
(d)
Terna borrowing
On March 1, 2005, Terna signed a euro 300 million
loan agreement with the European Investment Bank (EIB) to
cover part of Terna’s investment in its development
program. The loan was disbursed to Terna for
euro 100 million on March 15, 2005 with the
remaining euro 200 million to be disbursed by the end
of 2006. The loan has a term of 15 years and will be repaid
in semiannual instalments commencing from the fifth year. The
loan bears interest at a cost equal to the quarterly rate
determined by the EIB increased by a margin of 12 basis
points, with a cap equal to 27 basis points over the
Euribor rate.
(e)
Issue of Euro 1 Billion in Bonds to Italian Investors
On March 10, 2005, ENEL closed a public offering for
euro 1 billion of bonds reserved for Italian
investors. The issue is divided into euro 600 million
of fixed rate and euro 400 million of floating rate
bonds. All of the bonds have a 7 year maturity. The fixed
rate bonds have an annual coupon of 3.625%, while the floating
rate bonds have an annual coupon based on the 6-month Euribor
plus 0.10%.
(f)
Sale of 29.99% of Terna
In May 2005, ENEL signed an agreement for the sale of 29.99% of
Terna to Cassa Depositi e Prestiti SpA. The price for the
transaction is subject to certain references and adjustment
mechanisms, such of the share price of Terna at the close and
dividends to be paid. The effectiveness of the agreement is
contingent on the approval of the Antitrust Authority the
transfer of management of the transmission grid to Terna and the
calling of a Terna shareholders’ meeting to elect new board
members following the transfer of the GRTN operations to Terna,
in conformity with the Prime Minister’s Decree of
May 11, 2004.
(g)
Sale of 13.86% of Terna share capital
On March 30, 2005, ENEL sold 13.86% of Terna’s share
capital. The transaction, which was structured as a competitive
bid procedure with the participation of Italian and
international institutional investors, resulted in a sales price
of euro 2.05 per share. The proceeds from the sale
were euro 568 million, generating a gain under
Italian GAAP of euro 314 million. The transaction
was settled through the delivery of shares and payment of
consideration on April 5, 2005.
The transaction was part of ENEL’s strategy to
progressively reduce its holding in Terna. Law 290/2003
(reaffirmed by the Prime Minister’s Order of May 11,2004) requires ENEL to reduce its holding in Terna to no more
than 20% by July 1, 2007. Terna’s bylaws, which were
recently amended in compliance with the Prime Minister’s
Order, limit the voting rights of electricity companies
(including ENEL) in the appointment of Directors to 5%.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS — (Continued)
Following this sale, and the sale of 29.99% of Terna to CDP, as
discussed above, ENEL’s investment in Terna will decrease
to just over 6.1%. ENEL’s share holding will decrease even
further (to approximately 5%) following the vesting, expected in
December 2005, of bonus share rights acquired by subscribers of
Terna’s public offering in June 2004 who meet certain
criteria.
(h)
Litigation
On April 6, 2005, as a result of Energy Authority
investigations in June 2004 and January 2005 into sharp
increases in the price of electricity on the Italian power
exchange, the Antitrust Authority opened proceedings for alleged
abuse of dominant position against ENEL and Enel Produzione. In
particular, the Antitrust Authority alleges that Enel used its
market power to fix prices, in order to either advantage or
disadvantage competitors, by taking advantage of differences in
prices among different zones of the market. These antitrust
proceedings are expected to be concluded by March 31, 2006.
The Company does not believe it has committed any violation of
antitrust laws, but the possibility that the Company will be
held liable in the current investigations by the relevant
antitrust authority cannot be excluded. Should the Company be
held liable in the current or any future investigations, and
should such liability result in the imposition of significant
fines or of material restrictions on the Company’s
activity, management believes there could be a material adverse
effect on the Company’s financial condition and results of
operations.
On March 1, 2005, the Antitrust Authority initiated
proceedings against WIND, as well as its competitors Telecom
Italia Mobile and Vodafone, for an alleged abuse of a dominant
position and/or existence of a cartel to restrict competition in
the mobile telephony market, following allegations of
anticompetitive behavior by certain suppliers of other
telecommunication services. These suppliers allege that Wind and
the other two companies engaged in anticompetitive behavior by:
(i) preventing access to their existing mobile networks by
other operators; (ii) discriminating the alternative
operators in favor of their own commercial divisions in so far
as call termination services are concerned, and
(iii) parallel commercial behavior with respect to the
supply of mobile communications services for business customers.
WIND is currently waiting for a hearing date to be set. The
evidence phase of the proceedings is expected to be completed by
the end of April 2006. While the Company does not believe WIND
has committed any violation of antitrust laws, management cannot
exclude the possibility that it will be held liable as a result
of the current investigation by the Antitrust Authority. If the
Antitrust Authority were to hold WIND liable for the abusive
practices alleged, it could impose material restrictions on
WIND’s activities or a fine on WIND of up to 10% of its
total revenues in the preceding fiscal year, which could have a
material adverse effect on the Company’s financial
condition and results of operations.
On May 6, 2005, INPS, the Italian social security fund,
issued a circular purporting to extend to formerly state-owned
companies and national public entities carrying out industrial
activities an obligation for employers to make certain social
security contributions. As state-owned entities, these companies
had been exempted from this obligation. In the circular, INPS
indicated that this obligation would be applied with retroactive
effect as of the date of privatization of the relevant entity.
Although the INPS circular specifically mentions ENEL Group
companies as being among the entities that would be required to
make such additional contributions, the Company does not believe
that this circular should be applicable, nor that it may be
applied retroactively under Italian law, and the Company intends
to challenge the circular before the competent court. However,
the Company is not able to predict the ultimate outcome of the
challenge, and in the case of an unfavorable outcome, the
Company cannot exclude the possibility that it may be required
to pay such contributions.
(i)
Sale of Wind
On May 6, 2005, ENEL Investment Holdings BV and ENEL signed
an agreement with Weather Investments for the sale of WIND in a
series of transactions, involving our sale of a 62.75% stake in
Wind, for
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS — (Continued)
euro 2,986 million, net of debt assumed. ENEL expects
the sale to close during the summer of 2005. Upon closing of the
sale, ENEL will use euro 305 million of the proceeds
to acquire a 5.2% interest in Weather.
Our agreement, with Weather Investments contemplates a put and
call agreement according to which, Weather Investments can
require us to sell (in the period from January 15 to
March 15, 2006) and we can require Weather Investments to
buy (in the period from March 15 to June 30, 2006) the
remaining stake of WIND held by ENEL for consideration of
euro 328 million and additional shares in Weather
Investments which will bring ENEL’s total equity holding in
Weather to 26.1%.
(j)
Acquisition of Distribution Companies in Romania
On April 28, 2005, ENEL signed an agreement for the
acquisition for euro 112 million of a 51% interest in
two Romanian electricity distribution companies, Electrica Banat
and Electrica Dobrogea. The price paid covers the transfer of
shares and capital increases of both companies.
F-92
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of Wind
Telecomunicazioni SpA
We have audited the consolidated balance sheets of Wind
Telecomunicazioni SpA (an Italian corporation) and its
subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31,2004 and 2003, and the related consolidated statements of
operations, changes in shareholders’ equity and cash flows
for each of the three years in the period ended
December 31, 2004 (all expressed in Euro). These financial
statements are the responsibility of the Company’s
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these
financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred
to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial
position of Wind Telecomunicazioni SpA and its subsidiaries as
of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the results of their
operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in
the period ended December 31, 2004 in conformity with the
accounting principles generally accepted in Italy.
We draw your attention to the matters regarding deferred tax
assets and intangible assets as described in the notes to the
consolidated financial statements.
Accounting principles generally accepted in Italy vary in
certain significant respects from accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America. Information
relating to the nature and effect of such differences is
presented in the footnotes to the consolidated financial
statements under the caption US GAAP schedules and additional
disclosures.
/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers
Spa
Rome, 8 June 2005
PricewaterhouseCoopers SpA
F-93
SIGNATURES
The registrant hereby certifies that it meets all of the
requirements for filing on Form 20-F and has duly caused
this annual report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.