SEC Info  
  Home     Search     My Interests     Help     Sign In     Please Sign In  

Pennsylvania Real Estate Investment Trust · 424B5 · On 12/19/97

Filed On 12/19/97   ·   SEC File 33-61115   ·   Accession Number 950116-97-2326

  in   Show  and 
Help... Wildcards:  ? (any letter),  * (many).  Logic:  for Docs: (and), (or);  for Text: (anywhere),  "(&)" (near).
  As Of               Filer                 Filing     On/For/As Docs:Pgs              Issuer               Agent

12/19/97  Pennsylvania REIT                 424B5                  1:167                                    950116

Prospectus   ·   Rule 424(b)(5)
Filing Table of Contents

Document/Exhibit                   Description                      Pages   Size 

 1: 424B5       Prospectus                                           167    965K 


Document Table of Contents

Page (sequential) | (alphabetic) Top
 
11st Page
"Prospectus Supplement
3Summary
"The Company
4Acquisition Properties
5Development Properties
6Business and Growth Strategies
7The Offering
10Preit
"Tro
"The TRO Transaction
11Acquisition of TRO and Related Property Interests
12The Goldenberg Letter Agreement
13Right of First Refusal Properties
23Use of proceeds
24Capitalization
25Selected Financial and Operating Data
27Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
"Results of Operations
28Liquidity and Capital Resources
29The Credit Facility
32Funds from operations
34The Properties
35Property
40The Acquisition Properties
42The Development Properties
48Management
56Principal Securityholders
58Underwriting
59Experts
"Legal Matters
62Assets
63Pro Forma Consolidating Income Statement for the Year Ended August 31, 1997
"Revenues
71Shares
72Cash flows from operating activities
73Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
75Net income per share
91Cash and cash equivalents
103Balance Sheet as of September 30, 1997
104Statement of Operations for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 1997
105Statement of Partners' Capital for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 1997
106Statement of Cash Flows for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 1997
113Notes to Statements of Revenues and Certain Expenses
119Incorporation of Certain Documents by Reference
120Cautionary Statement
122Risk Factors
123Multifamily properties
125Possible Environmental Liabilities
127Legal Proceedings
128Risks of Development
"Risks of Third-Party Management Business
132Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
"Description of Debt Securities
135Merger, Consolidation or Sale
136Events of Default, Notice and Waiver
139Subordination
142Global Securities
143Description of Preferred Shares of Beneficial Interest
147Limited Liability of Shareholders
148Restrictions on Ownership
149Description of Shares of Beneficial Interest
150Restrictions on Transfer
151Ownership Limit
152Summary of the Trust Agreement
154Description of Share Warrants
"Description of Shareholder Rights
155Summary of the Operating Partnership Agreement
"Authorization of OP Units and Voting Rights
156Other Rights
158Federal Income Tax Considerations
"Taxation of the Company
160Annual Distribution Requirements
161Failure to Qualify
164Other Tax Considerations
"Plan of Distribution
424B51st Page of 167TOCTopPreviousNextBottomJust 1st
 
Sponsored Ads...

[GRAPHIC OMITTED] PROSPECTUS SUPPLEMENT (To Prospectus dated December 17, 1997) 4,000,000 Shares PENNSYLVANIA REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST Shares of Beneficial Interest --------------------- Pennsylvania Real Estate Investment Trust (the "Company") is a fully integrated, self-administered and self-managed real estate investment trust ("REIT") which acquires, develops, redevelops and operates retail and multifamily properties. Founded in 1960, the Company is one of the 15 largest publicly held operators of retail properties in the United States. On September 30, 1997, the Company acquired The Rubin Organization, Inc., a commercial property development and management firm, and certain related real estate interests. The Company's portfolio includes interests in 17 shopping centers containing an aggregate of approximately 6.0 million square feet and interests in 19 multifamily properties containing 7,236 units. Substantially all of the Company's properties are located in the Eastern United States, with concentrations in the Mid-Atlantic states and in Florida. The Company also provides management, leasing and/or development services for 49 retail properties containing approximately 19.2 million square feet and 11 office buildings containing approximately 4.0 million square feet for affiliated and third-party property owners. All of the Company's Shares of Beneficial Interest, par value $1.00 per share (the "Shares"), offered hereby (the "Offering") are being sold by the Company. To assist the Company in complying with certain qualification requirements applicable to REITs, the trust agreement of the Company (the "Trust Agreement") provides that no person may beneficially own more than 9.9% of the outstanding Shares, subject to certain specified exceptions. See "Description of Shares of Beneficial Interest--Restrictions on Transfer" in the accompanying Prospectus. Upon completion of the Offering, management and trustees of the Company will beneficially own approximately 11.7% of the equity in the Company. The Shares are listed on the New York Stock Exchange (the "NYSE") under the symbol "PEI." On December 17, 1997, the last reported sale price of the Shares on the NYSE was $22 3/8. See "Price Range of Shares and Distributions." --------------------- See "Risk Factors" beginning on page 4 of the accompanying Prospectus for certain factors relevant to an investment in the Shares offered hereby. --------------------- THESE SECURITIES HAVE NOT BEEN APPROVED OR DISAPPROVED BY THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION NOR HAS THE COMMISSION PASSED UPON THE ACCURACY OR ADEQUACY OF THIS PROSPECTUS SUPPLEMENT OR THE ACCOMPANYING PROSPECTUS. ANY REPRESENTATION TO THE CONTRARY IS A CRIMINAL OFFENSE. ================================================================================ Price to Underwriting Discounts Proceeds to Public and Commissions (1) Company (2) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Per Share ...... $ 22.375 $ 1.34 $ 21.035 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Total(3) ...... $89,500,000 $5,360,000 $84,140,000 ================================================================================ (1) The Company has agreed to indemnify the Underwriters against certain liabilities, including liabilities under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. See "Underwriting." (2) Before deducting expenses payable by the Company estimated at $950,000. (3) The Company has granted the Underwriters a 30-day option to purchase up to 600,000 additional Shares on the same terms and conditions as set forth above soley to cover over-allotments, if any. If such option is exercised in full, the total Price to Public, Underwriting Discounts and Commissions, and Proceeds to Company will be $102,925,000, $6,164,000 and $96,761,000, respectively. See "Underwriting." --------------------- The Shares offered by this Prospectus Supplement are offered by the several Underwriters, subject to prior sale, to withdrawal, cancellation or modification of the offer without notice, to delivery and acceptance by the Underwriters and to certain further conditions. It is expected that delivery of the Shares will be made at the offices of Lehman Brothers Inc., New York, New York on or about December 23, 1997. --------------------- LEHMAN BROTHERS LEGG MASON WOOD WALKER INCORPORATED MERRILL LYNCH & CO. SALOMON SMITH BARNEY WHEAT FIRST BUTCHER SINGER December 17, 1997
424B52nd Page of 167TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 2nd
[GRAPHIC OMITTED] [The inside front cover and inside back cover contain 11 pictures of the following properties: (i) Northeast Tower Center (outside shot of The Home Depot with caption indicating anticipated acquisition date); (ii) Crest Plaza Shopping Center (outside shot of Weis Markets); (iii) Laurel Mall (aerial shot); (iv) Hillview Shopping Center (outside shot of Target Greatland with caption indicating anticipated acquisition date); (v) Lehigh Valley Mall (two inside shots; before and after presentation); (vi) Hillview Shopping Center (outside night shot with caption indicating anticipated acquisition date); (vii) Cobblestone Apartments (outside shot); (viii) Eagle's Nest Apartments (outside shot); (ix) Hidden Lakes Apartments (outside shot); and (x) Palms of Pembroke Apartments (outside shot).] [The inside front cover also includes a map of the Eastern United States setting forth the location of Existing, Acquisition and Development Properties and the headquarters and regional offices of the Company.] CERTAIN PERSONS PARTICIPATING IN THIS OFFERING MAY ENGAGE IN TRANSACTIONS THAT STABILIZE, MAINTAIN OR OTHERWISE AFFECT THE PRICE OF THE SHARES. SUCH TRANSACTIONS MAY INCLUDE THE PURCHASE OF SHARES PRIOR TO THE PRICING OF THE OFFERING FOR THE PURPOSE OF MAINTAINING THE PRICE OF THE SHARES, THE PURCHASE OF SHARES FOLLOWING THE PRICING OF THE OFFERING TO COVER A SYNDICATE SHORT POSITION IN THE SHARES OR FOR THE PURPOSE OF MAINTAINING THE PRICE OF THE SHARES AND THE IMPOSITION OF PENALTY BIDS. FOR A DESCRIPTION OF THESE ACTIVITIES, SEE "UNDERWRITING."
424B53rd Page of 167TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 3rd
SUMMARY The following summary is qualified in its entirety by the more detailed information appearing elsewhere in this Prospectus Supplement and the accompanying Prospectus or incorporated therein by reference. Unless otherwise indicated, the information in this Prospectus Supplement assumes that the Underwriters' over-allotment option is not exercised. Pennsylvania Real Estate Investment Trust, a Pennsylvania business trust (the "Company"), conducts substantially all of its operations through PREIT Associates, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership (the "Operating Partnership"). As used herein, unless the context indicates otherwise, the term "Company" includes Pennsylvania Real Estate Investment Trust, the Operating Partnership and their subsidiaries and affiliates, including PREIT-RUBIN, Inc. (formerly The Rubin Organization, Inc.), a commercial property development and management firm in which the Company owns 95% of the economic interests in the form of non-voting common shares (together with its predecessors, "PREIT-RUBIN"). The Company The Company is a fully integrated real estate operating company active in acquiring, developing, redeveloping, managing and leasing retail and multifamily properties. Founded in 1960, the Company is one of the 15 largest publicly held operators of retail properties in the United States (in terms of square feet owned and/or managed). On September 30, 1997, the Company acquired The Rubin Organization, Inc., a commercial property development and management firm, and certain related real estate interests. The Company owns interests in 17 retail properties (the "Existing Retail Properties") containing an aggregate of approximately 6.0 million square feet, 19 multifamily properties (the "Multifamily Properties") containing an aggregate of 7,236 units, six industrial properties containing an aggregate of approximately 700,000 square feet and three parcels of undeveloped land. In addition, the Company has entered into agreements to acquire interests in two shopping centers containing an aggregate of approximately 824,000 square feet (the "Acquisition Properties"). The Company also owns interests in five shopping centers under development (the "Development Properties"), which are expected to contain an aggregate of approximately 2.2 million square feet upon completion. Two of the Development Properties are currently under construction, and the Company anticipates that the remaining three Development Properties will be completed by the year 2000. The Company provides management, leasing and/or development services for 49 retail properties containing approximately 19.2 million square feet and 11 office buildings containing approximately 4.0 million square feet for affiliated and third-party property owners. The Company's management team has extensive experience in the commercial real estate industry. The Company's 21 most senior corporate and property-level employees have an average of 23 years of experience in the real estate industry and an average of 15 years of experience with the Company and its predecessors. The Company has approximately 1,150 employees, approximately 1,000 of whom are located on-site at the Company's owned and managed properties. The Company maintains its headquarters in Fort Washington, Pennsylvania, a suburb of Philadelphia, and has regional offices in Chicago, Illinois, Atlanta, Georgia and Boca Raton, Florida. Recent Developments Acquisition of The Rubin Organization, Inc. On September 30, 1997, the Company acquired The Rubin Organization, Inc. (renamed "PREIT-RUBIN, Inc.") and interests in certain related retail properties (the "TRO Transaction") as part of the Company's previously announced strategy to acquire management, leasing and development expertise for retail properties, as well as to grow its portfolio of owned properties. Founded in 1946, The Rubin Organization was a Philadelphia-based owner, operator and developer of commercial real estate properties. As part of the TRO Transaction, the Company also acquired interests in four of the Existing Retail Properties containing an aggregate of approximately 2.1 million square feet, and obtained the right to S-1
424B54th Page of 167TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 4th
acquire the Acquisition Properties and four of the Development Properties. Of the four Existing Retail Properties acquired, two were purchased from entities affiliated with investor Samuel Zell for a combination of cash, assumption of debt and issuance of units of limited partner interest in the Operating Partnership ("OP Units"). The following table sets forth certain information regarding the four Existing Retail Properties acquired in the TRO Transaction: Recent Acquisitions · Download Table Percentage Percentage Total Owned Leased at Property and Location Owned Square Feet Square Feet 9/30/97 --------------------------- ------------ ------------- ------------- ----------- The Court at Oxford Valley Langhorne, PA ............ 50% 692,000 457,000 100% Magnolia Mall Florence, SC ............ 100% 570,000 570,000 98% North Dartmouth Mall North Dartmouth, MA ...... 100% 620,000 620,000 88% Springfield Park Springfield, PA(1) ...... 50% 209,000 65,000 N/A ------- ------- Total .................. 2,091,000 1,712,000 ========= ========= ------------ (1) The Company owns an undivided one-half interest in one of three floors in this former department store as a tenant in common. The Company acquired this vacant property for purposes of redevelopment. The following table sets forth certain information regarding the Acquisition Properties: Acquisition Properties · Enlarge/Download Table Percentage Percentage To Be Total Owned Leased at Property and Location Acquired Square Feet Square Feet 9/30/97 ------------------------- -------------- ------------- ---------------- ------------- Hillview Shopping Center Cherry Hill, NJ ......... 50% 340,000 340,000(1) 100% Northeast Tower Center(2) Philadelphia, PA ...... 100%(3) 484,000 353,000(4) 99%(5) ------- ------- Total ............... 824,000 693,000 ======= ======= ------------ (1) Includes 261,000 square feet of retail space situated on land leased to tenants which own their own buildings. (2) Information includes 121,000 square feet currently under development (Phase II). Phase I is 99% leased. (3) The Company will initially acquire an 89% interest in the partnerships which own this property and the right to acquire the remaining 11% interest not earlier than three years from the initial acquisition date. (4) Includes 153,000 square feet of retail space situated on land leased to tenants which own their own buildings. (5) Of constructed and owned space. S-2
424B55th Page of 167TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 5th
The following table sets forth certain information regarding the Development Properties: Development Properties · Enlarge/Download Table Planned Percentage Total Expected Property and Location To Be Owned Square Feet Status(1) Completion -------------------------------- ------------- ------------- -------------- -------------------- Christiana Power Center Phase I Newark, DE ..................... 50% 295,000 Construction Second half of 1998 Red Rose Commons Lancaster, PA .................. 50%(2) 463,000 Construction Second half of 1998 Warrington Shopping Center Warrington, PA ............... 100% 415,000 Development Second half of 1999 Blue Route Metroplex Plymouth Meeting, PA ......... 50%(2) 760,000 Development First half of 2000 Christiana Power Center Phase II Newark, DE ..................... 50% 300,000 Development Second half of 2000 ------- Total ..................... 2,233,000 ========= ------------ (1) "Construction" indicates that construction activities, such as site preparation, ground-breaking activities, or exterior construction, have commenced. "Development" indicates that development activities, such as site surveys, preparation of architectural plans, or initiation of land use approvals or rezoning processes, have commenced (but "Construction" has not commenced). (2) Subject to reduction as described under "The Company -- The TRO Transaction -- The Goldenberg Letter Agreement." Formation of Operating Partnership. The Company recently formed the Operating Partnership to hold substantially all of its assets. The Company believes that the operating partnership structure provides it with a competitive advantage in acquiring properties from sellers who desire to defer the tax consequences of a sale. Following the Offering, the Company will own a 94.2% limited partner interest and a 1.0% sole general partner interest in the Operating Partnership. The Company anticipates that all future property acquisitions will be owned, directly or indirectly, by the Operating Partnership. Expansion of Credit Facility. On September 30, 1997, the Company replaced its $75.0 million credit facility with a $150.0 million credit facility (the "Credit Facility"). The prior credit facility carried an interest rate equal to the 30-day London Interbank Offered Rate ("LIBOR") plus 1.85%. The Company reduced the interest rate under the new Credit Facility to LIBOR plus 1.70%, which will be further reduced to LIBOR plus 1.40% following the Offering and the application of the net proceeds therefrom (see "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations -- Liquidity and Capital Resources -- The Credit Facility"). Following the Offering, the Company will have approximately $105.4 million available under the Credit Facility to fund additional growth. NYSE Listing. On November 14, 1997, the Shares commenced trading on the NYSE. The Company believes that its listing on the NYSE will enhance shareholder value by increasing the liquidity of the Shares and increasing the Shares' appeal to institutional investors. S-3
424B56th Page of 167TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 6th
Business and Growth Strategies Business Strategies The Company's primary business objective is to maximize the total return to its shareholders through growth in cash flow and appreciation in the value of its assets. The Company plans to achieve this objective by employing the operating strategies and capitalizing upon the internal and external growth opportunities described below. Operating Strategies and Organizational Strengths Fully Integrated Real Estate Operating Company. The Company is a fully integrated real estate operating company active in acquiring, developing, redeveloping, managing and leasing retail and multifamily properties. The Company believes that the integration of The Rubin Organization's real estate operating skills with its own asset management skills will provide it with the ability to develop, acquire and manage a growing portfolio. In addition to leasing and property management, the Company's personnel also perform a number of staff and administrative functions, including financial services, lease administration, legal services, human resources, management information systems, marketing, purchasing and risk management. Development Capabilities. The Company's development group is staffed by eight full-time development professionals who have significant experience in the development of retail, multifamily and other commercial properties. Over The Rubin Organization's 50-year history, it and its predecessors have been responsible for major development projects such as: Christiana Mall in Newark, Delaware; Willow Grove Park Mall in Willow Grove, Pennsylvania; Cumberland Mall in Vineland, New Jersey; Newburgh Mall in Newburgh, New York; and Mellon Bank Center and historic redevelopments such as The Bellevue and One Penn Center at Suburban Station, all in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Benefits of Size. As one of the 15 largest publicly held operators of retail properties in the United States, the Company believes it has certain strategic and financial advantages over smaller operators. These advantages include: (i) strong relationships with tenants, facilitating the leasing of retail space in its properties; (ii) economies of scale in the operation of its properties; (iii) the enhanced ability to attract and retain qualified employees; and (iv) improved liquidity and access to capital. Growth Strategies The Company seeks to increase cash flow by intensively managing its properties and selectively acquiring, repositioning and developing additional retail and multifamily properties. The Company also intends to continue to pursue strategic acquisitions of other real estate companies and portfolios, such as the TRO Transaction, which complement its existing portfolio and management capabilities. Internal Growth Strategies. The Company seeks to increase cash flow at its properties by achieving rent increases while maintaining high occupancy levels and aggressively controlling operating expenses. The Company believes that by applying its management and leasing skills and experience it can enhance the operating performance of the existing portfolio by increasing rents, optimizing the tenant mix of its retail and multifamily properties, maintaining high occupancy rates and internalizing property management and leasing responsibilities for certain of its properties now managed by third parties. Acquisition Strategies. The Company's acquisition strategies focus on the purchase of middle market retail properties and multifamily properties which the Company believes will benefit from more proactive management and leasing, selective re-tenanting and strategic capital improvements. The Company also intends to continue to take advantage of its third-party management business to evaluate and selectively acquire properties managed for its third-party clients. In addition, the Company will continue to evaluate strategic acquisitions and/or business combinations with other real estate companies and portfolio owners. The Company believes that the real estate industry is in a period of sustained consolidation, and that opportunities will arise to acquire other real estate companies. S-4
424B57th Page of 167TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 7th
Repositioning and Redevelopment Strategies. The Company's ability to reposition and redevelop retail and multifamily properties is a core element of its business and growth strategies. The Company uses its internal redevelopment expertise and resources to create value in newly acquired properties, frequently in cases in which the prior owner was unable to maximize the property's value due to a lack of managerial or financial resources. Development of Power Center Retail Properties. The Company's property development strategy currently focuses on the construction of power centers in its core Mid-Atlantic markets. The Company's development and site selection strategy is tenant-driven: the Company uses its relationships with key power center tenants such as The Home Depot, Target and Kohl's to identify sites desirable to such retailers. After pre-leasing or pre-selling one or more portions of a targeted site to key anchor tenants, the Company is able to aggressively pre-lease the remaining space to other desirable retail tenants. The Offering · Enlarge/Download Table Shares offered .................................... 4,000,000 Shares to be outstanding after the Offering ...... 12,685,098(1) Use of proceeds ................................. To repay indebtedness, including indebtedness incurred in connection with the Company's recent acquisition and development activities, and for general corporate purposes. See "Use of Proceeds." NYSE symbol ....................................... "PEI" ------------ (1) Does not include Shares reserved for issuance upon redemption of 646,286 issued and outstanding OP Units or 933,375 Shares reserved for issuance upon the exercise of options which have been granted by the Company, 314,786 of which are currently exercisable and 618,589 of which become exercisable at various times over the next four years. S-5
424B58th Page of 167TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 8th
Summary Financial and Operating Information The following table sets forth certain financial and operating information for the Company for each of the five years ended August 31, 1997. Such information should be read in conjunction with the Company's financial statements and the notes thereto, "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" and pro forma financial statements contained elsewhere herein. Effective January 1, 1998, the Company's fiscal year will be reported on a calendar year basis. The unaudited pro forma information is presented as if the Offering and the TRO Transaction had been completed on August 31, 1997 for balance sheet purposes and on September 1, 1996 for purposes of the income statement and other data. The unaudited pro forma information is not necessarily indicative of what the actual financial position or results of operations of the Company would have been as of and for the period presented, nor does it purport to represent the Company's future financial position or results of operations. · Enlarge/Download Table For the Fiscal Years Ended August 31, --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Historical Pro Forma ------------------------------------------------------------------- 1997(1) 1997 1996 1995 1994 1993 ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- (amounts in thousands, except per share data) Income Statement Data: Revenues: Gross revenues from real estate ...... $52,721 $40,231 $38,985 $36,978 $27,640 $21,083 Interest and other income ............ 488 254 171 176 274 542 -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- Total revenues ..................... 53,209 40,485 39,156 37,154 27,914 21,625 Expenses: Property operating expenses ......... 20,253 16,289 16,102 14,859 11,758 8,959 Depreciation and amortization ......... 8,816 6,259 5,908 5,286 3,541 2,784 General and administrative expenses ........................... 3,324 3,324 3,119 3,091 2,528 1,873 Interest expense ..................... 9,167 9,086 9,831 8,908 4,162 2,222 Provision for losses on investments 500 500 -- -- 1,795 320 -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- Total expenses ..................... 42,060 35,458 34,960 32,144 23,784 16,158 -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- Income before other income and expense .............................. 11,149 5,027 4,196 5,010 4,130 5,467 Equity in income of partnerships and joint ventures ........................ 4,757 4,337 6,258 6,381 4,416 4,750 Equity in loss of PREIT-RUBIN ......... (80) -- -- -- -- -- Gains on sales of interests in real estate .............................. 1,069 1,069 865 119 12,362 3,875 Minority interest ..................... (999) (198) (275) (285) (221) (92) -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- Net income ........................... $15,896 $10,235 $11,044 $11,225 $20,687 $14,000 ======== ======== ======== ======== ======== ======== Per Share Results: Income before gains on sales of interests in real estate ............ $ 1.17 $ 1.06 $ 1.17 $ 1.28 $ 0.96 $ 1.17 Gains on sales of interests in real estate .............................. .08 0.12 0.10 0.01 1.43 0.45 --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- Net income ........................... $ 1.25 $ 1.18 $ 1.27 $ 1.29 $ 2.39 $ 1.62 ========= ========= ========= ========= ========= ========= Weighted average number of shares outstanding (2) ..................... 12,679 8,679 8,676 8,671 8,664 8,643 S-6
424B59th Page of 167TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 9th
· Enlarge/Download Table For the Fiscal Years Ended August 31, ------------------------------- Historical Pro Forma ------------- 1997(1) 1997 ---------------- ------------- (amounts in thousands, except per share data) Balance Sheet Data (at end of period): Investments in real estate, at cost ...... $ 284,765 $ 202,443 Total assets .............................. 262,636 165,657 Total debt ................................. 116,069 117,412 Minority interest ........................ 15,672 540 Shareholders' equity ..................... 124,089 40,899 Other Data: Cash flows from operating activities ...... (3) 15,219 Cash flows from investing activities ...... (3) 7,749 Cash flows from financing activities ...... (3) (22,599) Funds from operations (4) .................. 29,171 19,660 EBITDA (5) ................................. 48,719 35,169 Total leasable square footage of retail properties (at end of period) ...... 5,968,000 4,470,000 Total multifamily units (at end of period) .................................... 7,236 7,236 Number of properties (at end of period): Retail .................................... 17 15 Multifamily .............................. 19 19 Percentage leased (at end of period): Retail .................................... 89% 87% Multifamily .............................. 97% 97% For the Fiscal Years Ended August 31, ---------------------------------------------------------- Historical ---------------------------------------------------------- 1996 1995 1994 1993 ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- (amounts in thousands, except per share data) Balance Sheet Data (at end of period): Investments in real estate, at cost ...... $ 198,542 $ 195,929 $ 154,281 $ 112,262 Total assets .............................. 177,725 181,336 142,495 107,854 Total debt ................................. 124,148 122,518 80,155 51,929 Minority interest ........................ 542 528 408 331 Shareholders' equity ..................... 46,505 51,771 56,748 51,852 Other Data: Cash flows from operating activities ...... 15,090 16,672 15,909 13,034 Cash flows from investing activities ...... 933 (40,082) (18,524) (38,683) Cash flows from financing activities ...... (16,091) 22,356 3,305 25,913 Funds from operations (4) .................. 18,628 18,963 16,417 16,870 EBITDA (5) ................................. 34,423 33,936 24,854 27,161 Total leasable square footage of retail properties (at end of period) ...... 4,806,000 4,866,000 4,798,000 5,527,000 Total multifamily units (at end of period) .................................... 7,236 7,337 6,815 6,107 Number of properties (at end of period): Retail .................................... 18 18 19 22 Multifamily .............................. 19 20 19 17 Percentage leased (at end of period): Retail .................................... 90% 92% 90% 90% Multifamily .............................. 95% 96% 95% 97% ------------ (1) See Notes to Management's Assumptions to Unaudited Pro Forma Consolidating Balance Sheet and Consolidating Income Statement contained elsewhere herein. (2) Weighted average number of Shares outstanding excludes Shares issuable upon conversion of outstanding OP Units and includes the dilutive effect of outstanding options. Income allocable to holders of OP Units is included in minority interest. (3) Pro forma information relating to cash flows from operating, investing and financing activities has not been included because the Company believes that the information would not be meaningful due to the number of assumptions required in order to calculate such information. (4) The White Paper on Funds from Operations approved by the Board of Governors of the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts ("NAREIT") in March 1995 defines Funds from Operations as net income (loss) computed in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles ("GAAP"), excluding gains (or losses) from debt restructuring and sales of properties, plus real estate related depreciation and amortization and after adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures. The Company believes that Funds from Operations is helpful to investors as a measure of the performance of an equity REIT because, along with cash flows from operating activities, financing activities, and investing activities, it provides investors with an indication of the ability of the Company to incur and service debt, to make capital expenditures and to fund other cash needs. The Company computes Funds from Operations in accordance with standards established by NAREIT which may not be comparable to Funds from Operations reported by other REITs that do not define the term in accordance with the current NAREIT definition or that interpret the current NAREIT definition differently than the Company. Funds from Operations does not represent cash generated from operating activities in accordance with GAAP and should not be considered as an alternative to net income (determined in accordance with GAAP) as an indication of the Company's financial performance or to cash flow from operating activities (determined in accordance with GAAP) as a measure of the Company's liquidity, nor is it indicative of funds available to fund the Company's cash needs, including its ability to make cash distributions. (5) EBITDA is defined as operating income before interest expense, income taxes, depreciation and amortization. The Company believes EBITDA is useful to investors as an indicator of the Company's ability to service debt and pay cash distributions. EBITDA, as calculated by the Company, may not be comparable to EBITDA reported by other REITs that do not define EBITDA exactly as the Company defines the term. EBITDA does not represent cash generated from operating activities determined in accordance with GAAP and should not be considered as an alternative to operating income or net income determined in accordance with GAAP as an indicator of performance or as an alternative to cash flows from operating activities as an indicator of liquidity. S-7
424B510th Page of 167TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 10th
THE COMPANY General The Company is a fully integrated real estate operating company active in acquiring, developing, redeveloping, managing and leasing retail and multifamily properties. Founded in 1960, the Company is one of the 15 largest publicly held operators of retail properties in the United States (in terms of square feet owned and/or managed). On September 30, 1997, the Company acquired The Rubin Organization, Inc., a commercial property development and management firm, and certain related real estate interests. The Company's portfolio includes interests in 17 shopping centers containing an aggregate of approximately 6.0 million square feet and interests in 19 multifamily properties containing an aggregate of 7,236 units. Substantially all of the Company's properties are located in the Eastern United States, with concentrations in the Mid-Atlantic states and in Florida. The Company also provides management, leasing and/or development services for 49 retail properties containing approximately 19.2 million square feet and 11 office buildings containing approximately 4.0 million square feet for affiliated and third-party property owners. As used herein, unless the context indicates otherwise, the term "PREIT" means Pennsylvania Real Estate Investment Trust and the term "TRO" means The Rubin Organization, Inc. (now known as PREIT-RUBIN), in each case prior to the date of the TRO Transaction. Background PREIT. PREIT was organized in 1960 as one of the first publicly held real estate investment trusts in the United States. Prior to the TRO Transaction, PREIT had historically maintained a limited management staff and relied upon its joint venture partners to operate its retail properties. Over the past several years, PREIT sought a strategic combination with a real estate operating company in order to improve its growth prospects and increase its appeal to equity investors. To that end, PREIT identified and evaluated several potential transactions, culminating in the TRO Transaction in September 1997. TRO. Richard I. Rubin and Co., Inc., the predecessor of The Rubin Organization, Inc., was founded in Philadelphia in 1946 by Richard I. Rubin as a retail leasing firm. During the 30 years after its organization, the firm expanded its business into the development and management of commercial and multifamily properties. In the 1970's, Richard I. Rubin's son, Ronald Rubin, directed the firm toward larger projects, including enclosed malls and office buildings. By the 1980's, Richard I. Rubin and Co., Inc. had become well known for its major development projects in the Delaware Valley, such as Christiana Mall in Newark, Delaware, and the Mellon Bank Center and the historic renovation of the Bellevue Stratford Hotel in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. In 1992, Richard I. Rubin and Co., Inc. combined its business with Strouse Greenberg and Co., Inc., a Philadelphia-based developer and manager of commercial properties, to form TRO. The combination with Strouse Greenberg significantly increased TRO's presence in the commercial property markets and positioned TRO to provide real estate services to a broader range of clients and properties in the retail, office, residential and hotel sectors. TRO's retail property business became the largest and best known segment of the business, with TRO becoming one of the 25 largest retail property managers in the United States (in terms of square feet managed) prior to its acquisition by PREIT. The TRO Transaction On September 30, 1997, PREIT and TRO completed the TRO Transaction, pursuant to which: o PREIT capitalized the Operating Partnership by transferring to it substantially all of its assets, or the beneficial interests therein, subject to its liabilities. o The Operating Partnership acquired all of the non-voting common shares, constituting 95% of the economic interest in TRO, in exchange for 200,000 Class A OP Units and the obligation to issue up to 800,000 additional Class A OP Units over the next five years, according to a formula based upon the Company's per Share growth in adjusted funds from operations (see " -- Acquisition of TRO and Related Property Interests"). S-8
424B511th Page of 167TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 11th
o The Operating Partnership acquired the interests of certain affiliates of TRO (the "TRO Affiliates") in: The Court at Oxford Valley, Langhorne, Pennsylvania; Magnolia Mall, Florence, South Carolina; North Dartmouth Mall, North Dartmouth, Massachusetts; and Springfield Park, Springfield, Pennsylvania. o The Operating Partnership agreed to acquire the interests of certain TRO Affiliates in: Hillview Shopping Center, Cherry Hill, New Jersey; and Northeast Tower Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. o The Operating Partnership acquired the development rights of certain TRO Affiliates, subject to related obligations, in: Christiana Power Center Phases I & II, Newark, Delaware; Red Rose Commons, Lancaster, Pennsylvania; and Blue Route Metroplex, Plymouth Meeting, Pennsylvania. o The Operating Partnership obtained rights of first refusal with respect to the interests of certain TRO Affiliates in: Christiana Mall, Newark, Delaware; Cumberland Mall, Vineland, New Jersey; and Fairfield Mall, Chicopee, Massachusetts. o Ronald Rubin was elected chief executive officer of the Company, Edward A. Glickman was elected chief financial officer and executive vice president of the Company, and George F. Rubin continued in his capacity as President of PREIT-RUBIN. o Ronald Rubin, George F. Rubin and Rosemarie B. Greco were elected as trustees of the Company to fill vacancies created by the resignations of Robert Freedman, Jack Farber and Robert G. Rogers. Acquisition of TRO and Related Property Interests. As part of the TRO Transaction, the Company entered into a contribution agreement (the "TRO Contribution Agreement") pursuant to which it acquired all of the non-voting shares of TRO for 200,000 Class A OP Units and the obligation to issue up to 800,000 additional Class A OP Units (the "Contingent TRO OP Units") over the following five-year period according to a formula based upon the Company's adjusted funds from operations ("Adjusted FFO") per Share during such period. Adjusted FFO is defined as the Company's consolidated net income for any period plus, to the extent deducted in computing such net income: (i) depreciation attributable to real property; (ii) certain amortization expenses; (iii) the expenses of the TRO Transaction; (iv) losses on the sale of real estate; (v) material write-downs on real estate; (vi) material prepayment penalties; and (vii) rents currently due in excess of rents reported, less: (i) rental revenue reported in excess of amounts currently due; (ii) lease termination fees; and (iii) gains on the sale of real estate. For the 12-month periods ending August 31, 1996 and August 31, 1997, the Company's Adjusted FFO per Share (without giving effect to the TRO Transaction) was $2.15 and $2.26, respectively. The TRO Contribution Agreement establishes "hurdle" and "target" levels set forth below for the Company's Adjusted FFO per Share during specified earn-out periods to determine whether, and to what extent, the Contingent TRO OP Units will be issued: · Download Table Base Maximum Adjusted Contingent Contingent FFO Per Share TRO OP Units TRO OP Units ------------------ -------------- ------------- Earn-Out Period Hurdle Target --------------------------- -------- ------- 10-1-97 to 12-31-97 ...... $0.58 $0.65 5,000 32,500 1-1-98 to 12-31-98 ...... $2.40 $2.66 20,000 130,000 1-1-99 to 12-31-99 ...... $2.53 $2.81 57,500 167,500 1-1-00 to 12-31-00 ...... $2.65 $2.94 57,500 167,500 1-1-01 to 12-31-01 ...... $2.83 $3.14 57,500 167,500 1-1-02 to 9-30-02 ......... $2.19 $2.43 52,500 135,000 ------ ------- Total .................. 250,000 800,000 ======= ======= In general: (i) if the "hurdle" level for any earn-out period is not met, no Contingent TRO OP Units will be issued in such period; (ii) if the "target" level for any earn-out period is met, the maximum number of Contingent TRO OP Units for such period will be issued; and (iii) if Adjusted FFO per Share for any earn-out period is between the "hurdle" and the "target" levels, the Operating Partnership will issue the base Contingent TRO OP Units for such period plus a pro rata number of Contingent TRO OP Units based upon the amount by which Adjusted FFO per Share exceeds the "hurdle" but was less than the "target." To the S-9
424B512th Page of 167TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 12th
extent the "target" levels of Adjusted FFO per Share are exceeded, the earn-out also provides the TRO principals with the ability to carry back to prior periods and to carry forward into the next period amounts in excess of the target in the current period, thereby earning additional Contingent TRO OP Units (but never more than the maximum amount). The TRO Contribution Agreement provides that in the event of a share split, share dividend or other similar change in the capitalization of the Company, the "hurdle" and "target" levels will be proportionately adjusted. The TRO Contribution Agreement also provides for the creation of a special committee of three independent Trustees to consider, among other matters, whether other equitable adjustments, either upward or downward, should be effected in the "hurdle" and "target" levels to reflect: (i) the incurrence by the Company of non-project specific indebtedness or the raising by the Company of equity capital; (ii) any breach by the Company of its representations or warranties in the TRO Contribution Agreement which may adversely affect Adjusted FFO; and (iii) the effect which any adverse judgment in litigation pending against the Company may have on Adjusted FFO. Due to the effect that the Offering will have on the TRO Class A Unitholders, the Company has been advised that, following the Offering, the TRO Affiliates will request that the special committee make downward adjustments in the "hurdle" and "target" levels. The special committee will review this request but is under no obligation to make modifications to the "hurdle" and "target" levels. If the levels are modified, the Company believes that the modifications will not have a material effect on the Company's funds from operations per Share. For provisions of the TRO Transaction relating to the valuation of the Acquisition Properties, see "The Properties -- The Acquisition Properties." For provisions of the TRO Transaction relating to the valuation of the interests in the four Development Properties acquired in the TRO Transaction, see "The Properties -- The Development Properties." The Goldenberg Letter Agreement. On September 30, 1997, as part of the TRO Transaction, the Company acquired from TRO its rights and obligations (including those of certain TRO Affiliates) under a letter agreement (the "Goldenberg Letter Agreement") with The Goldenberg Group, a regional developer and manager of retail properties. The Goldenberg Letter Agreement contemplates the development of six power centers, three by The Goldenberg Group and three by the Company. The Goldenberg Letter Agreement provides that the entity developing each respective property will have the right to manage such property, but that each of the six properties will be 50% owned by The Goldenberg Group and 50% owned by the Company. The Company is obligated under the Goldenberg Letter Agreement to provide a $5.0 million revolving capital facility to fund pre-development expenses on The Goldenberg Group's three projects. In addition, the Company must fund all such expenses on the Company's three projects. The Court at Oxford Valley, one of the Existing Retail Properties, was developed by The Goldenberg Group under the Goldenberg Letter Agreement, and Hillview Shopping Center, one of the Acquisition Properties, was developed by TRO under the Goldenberg Letter Agreement. The Goldenberg Group's remaining two development properties under the Goldenberg Letter Agreement are Red Rose Commons and Blue Route Metroplex. For each of the projects that The Goldenberg Group completes under The Goldenberg Letter Agreement, the Company must offer The Goldenberg Group a 50% equity interest in a project which the Company will develop. If the Company fails to offer The Goldenberg Group such projects meeting certain criteria within 18 months of the closing of a construction loan on each of Red Rose Commons (which occurred on November 28, 1997) and Blue Route Metroplex (which is anticipated to occur in the next 24 months), then the interest of the Company in Red Rose Commons and/or Blue Route Metroplex, as the case may be, will be reduced from 50% to 25%. There can be no assurance that the Company will meet its obligations under The Goldenberg Letter Agreement and, therefore, that the Company's interest in Red Rose Commons and/or Blue Route Metroplex will not be reduced from 50% to 25%. S-10
424B513th Page of 167TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 13th
Right of First Refusal Properties. As part of the TRO Transaction, the Company obtained rights of first refusal to purchase the interests of certain TRO Affiliates in the three retail properties listed below. Right of First Refusal Properties · Download Table Percentage Interest Total Subject to the Right Property and Location Square Feet of First Refusal ------------------------------------- ------------- --------------------- Christiana Mall, Newark, DE ......... 1,100,000 (1) Cumberland Mall, Vineland, NJ ...... 463,000 50% Fairfield Mall, Chicopee, MA ...... 418,000 50% --------- Total ........................... 1,981,000 ========= ------------ (1) The interest subject to the right of first refusal is subject to adjustment in connection with the refinancing of the participating mortgage which currently encumbers this property. Benefits to the Company of the TRO Transaction The Company believes that the benefits of the TRO Transaction include: o Enhanced Operating Performance of the Existing Retail Properties. The Company intends to apply TRO's experience in managing, leasing and redeveloping retail properties to maximize the internal growth potential of the Existing Retail Properties. o Acquisition Opportunities. The Company believes that TRO's extensive relationships and expertise in the real estate industry, as well as its third-party retail property management business, should result in a significant increase in the number of potential acquisitions identified and reviewed by the Company. o Development Opportunities. The Company anticipates that TRO's experience and resources in developing retail properties should lead to continued opportunities to develop new properties. o Capital Access. By acquiring TRO, the Company has significantly increased its size and management depth, which the Company believes will make it more attractive to equity investors. S-11
424B514th Page of 167TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 14th
Structure of the Company The Company conducts substantially all of its activities through the Operating Partnership, of which the Company is the sole general partner. Set forth below is a diagram of the structure of the Company following the completion of the Offering: [GRAPHIC OMITTED] [The graphic sets forth the following information: (i) the Company is a 1% general partner of the Operating Partnership and 100% owner of PREIT Property Trust; (ii) the minority limited partners owns a 4.8% limited partner interest in the Operating Partnership; (iii) PREIT Property Trust owns a 94.1% limited partner interest in the Operating Partnership; (iv) the Operating Partnership owns a 95% non-voting interest in PREIT-RUBIN, Inc.; (v) an employee stock bonus plan owns a 5% voting interest in PREIT-RUBIN, Inc. and (vi) the Operating Partnership has interests in 45 properties.] ------------ (1) The interests of the Operating Partnership in these properties range from 25% to 100% (see "The Properties"). S-12
424B515th Page of 167TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 15th
Competitive Advantages The Company believes it enjoys certain competitive advantages in pursuing its business and growth strategies. Fully Integrated Organization. The Company is a fully integrated real estate operating company with extensive experience in acquiring, developing, redeveloping, managing and leasing retail and multifamily properties. The Company's 21 most senior corporate and property-level employees have an average of 23 years of experience in the commercial and residential real estate industry. The Company's diverse real estate capabilities allow it to pursue a broad range of growth strategies in its primary markets, and to maintain the flexibility to accommodate tenants' varying space needs through expansion, redevelopment and development activities. Focus on Value-Added Acquisition and Repositioning Strategies. The Company's acquisition strategy focuses primarily on the identification of underperforming retail and multifamily properties which the Company believes have the potential for improved cash flow and value appreciation. The Company seeks to achieve such improved performance through a number of means, including: o Making strategic capital improvements designed to directly benefit the property's rental rate structure. o For retail properties, using the Company's extensive relationships with national and regional tenants to improve the property's occupancy level and the quality of its tenants. o Applying the Company's management skills and purchasing power to reduce the property's operating expense ratios through economies of scale and operating efficiencies. o Utilizing the Company's sophisticated management information systems to closely monitor the property's operations and leasing status in order to gauge the effectiveness of its turnaround strategies on a real-time basis. With respect to its strategy of acquiring underperforming properties, the Company attempts to differentiate between properties whose underperformance is a function of factors which the Company can improve (such as their tenant mix or physical condition) from those whose underperformance is driven by factors beyond the Company's control (such as their location). In its analysis of acquisition candidates, the Company applies its proprietary market research techniques, including the computerized analysis of demographic trends, to assess local market conditions. Development Expertise. The Company believes that the depth and experience of its development group is an integral factor in executing its business strategy. The Company applies its development skills to both the development of new assets as well as the repositioning of underperforming properties. During the last 20 years, the development group has completed over $1.0 billion of development and redevelopment projects. The Company's property development initiatives currently focus on the construction of power center retail properties in the Company's core Mid-Atlantic markets. The Company currently has interests in seven retail properties containing approximately 3.1 million square feet in various stages of development, including four properties containing approximately 1.6 million square feet under construction. The Development Properties represent built-in growth potential which the Company believes will contribute to funds from operations beginning in 1998. Benefits of Size. As one of the 15 largest publicly held operators of retail properties in the United States, the Company believes it has certain strategic and financial advantages over smaller operators. These advantages include: (i) strong relationships with tenants, facilitating the leasing of retail space in its properties; (ii) economies of scale in the operation of its properties; (iii) the enhanced ability to attract and retain qualified employees; and (iv) improved liquidity and access to capital. o Strong Tenant Relationships. The Company manages and leases retail properties, including 49 shopping centers located in 19 states, for affiliated and third-party owners. The breadth of the Company's owned and third-party managed portfolio generally provides it with extensive leasing relationships with numerous national and regional tenants. S-13
424B516th Page of 167TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 16th
As part of its ongoing relationships with such tenants, the Company is often aware of tenant space needs and preferences early in the site selection process, and is able to leverage this knowledge into the rapid leasing of the properties as well as to identify new development opportunities. In addition, by having multiple locations to offer to prospective tenants within a targeted market area, the Company believes it is more likely to attract such tenants to its properties. The Company believes that these relationships lead to enhanced performance at the Company's owned properties, as well as additional tenant-driven acquisition and development opportunities. o Economies of Scale. The size of the Company's owned and managed portfolio provides it with economies of scale in the operation and management of properties, directly benefiting the performance of the Company's owned and managed properties. Through the Company's Buying Economies Program (the "BEP"), the Company negotiates national purchasing contracts with key product and service vendors for items such as telephone service, paint, floor coverings, landscaping and supplies. In this manner, the Company capitalizes upon its purchasing power to improve operating margins at its owned and managed properties. The success of the BEP is reflected by the fact that the Company is able to sell participation in the BEP to third parties seeking to share in the benefits of the Company's purchasing power. An additional example of economies of scale is the Company's RubinEdge program. Through this program, the Company negotiates bulk discounts on products and services offered by merchants in its local market areas, and passes those discounts along to tenants as a value-added benefit for locating in a property managed by the Company. o Ability to Attract and Retain Qualified Employees. As a major owner and operator of retail and multifamily properties within its markets, and as a publicly traded company, the Company believes that its ability to attract and retain key employees is enhanced. Employees are attracted to the Company by its reputation, its extensive presence within its markets and the potential for advancement opportunities in a growing organization. The Company's 21 most senior corporate and property-level employees have an average of 23 years experience in the real estate industry and an average of 15 years with the Company and its predecessors. o Improved Liquidity and Access to Capital. As a public company, the Company believes that it has access to a broader and more cost efficient range of capital sources than many private real estate companies and opportunity funds with which the Company competes for acquisitions. Upon completion of the Offering, the Company will have approximately $105.4 million available under its Credit Facility, which the Company intends to use to fund its growth strategies. Strategic Information Systems. The Company has developed state-of-the-art management information systems which it utilizes to monitor the performance of its existing properties and to strategically target markets for acquisition and development activities. The Company's information systems are designed to support an on-site management and accounting system at its properties. In addition, the Company's high-speed wide area network links each managed property with the Company's regional offices and headquarters on a real-time basis. S-14
424B517th Page of 167TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 17th
BUSINESS AND GROWTH STRATEGIES Business Strategies The Company's primary business objective is to maximize the total return to its shareholders through growth in cash flow and appreciation in the value of its assets. The Company plans to achieve this objective by employing the operating strategies and capitalizing upon the internal and external growth opportunities described below. Operating Strategies and Organizational Strengths Fully Integrated Real Estate Operating Company. The Company is a fully integrated real estate company active in acquiring, developing, redeveloping, managing and leasing retail and multifamily properties. The Company believes that in order to remain competitive in today's real estate market, it must be able both to identify growth opportunities and capitalize upon those opportunities with internal personnel and resources. In its acquisition of The Rubin Organization, the Company gained access to the real estate operating skills and capabilities which it required to take a more proactive stance towards the management of its existing assets, as well as to internally manage properties which it seeks to acquire and develop. In addition to leasing and property management, the Company's personnel also perform a number of staff and administrative functions, including financial services, lease administration, legal services, human resources, management information systems, marketing, purchasing and risk management. Development Capabilities. The Company's development group is staffed by eight full-time development professionals who have significant experience in the development of retail, multifamily and other commercial properties. The development group is headed by Leonard B. Shore, Executive Vice President, who has over 42 years of experience in the development of commercial properties. Over The Rubin Organization's 50-year history, it and its predecessors have been responsible for major development projects such as Christiana Mall in Newark, Delaware; Willow Grove Park Mall in Willow Grove, Pennsylvania; Cumberland Mall in Vineland, New Jersey; Newburgh Mall in Newburgh, New York; and Mellon Bank Center, and historic redevelopments such as The Bellevue and One Penn Center at Suburban Station, all in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Proactive Leasing. The Company has implemented an aggressive leasing strategy based upon its knowledge of its markets and tenant needs. The key to the Company's strategic approach to retail leasing is its "Leasing Game Plan," an annual review held for each managed property in early fall. In the Leasing Game Plan process, the Company's property management and leasing professionals meet to develop leasing strategies and establish performance goals for the properties for the coming year. This process also serves as the basis of the property budgeting process for the coming year. The Company's retail leasing and development groups have 13 leasing professionals with offices in Philadelphia and Chicago, headed by Pat A. Berns, Executive Vice President. Ms. Berns has over 18 years of experience in the leasing of retail properties, and the other professionals in the group have an average of eight years of experience. Leasing agents are given responsibility for both specific properties and specific tenants across the entire portfolio. The group is compensated on a team basis depending on the total commission revenue generated by the group. In 1996, the Company executed 156 tenant leases for over 1.4 million square feet in its managed portfolio. Year to date, the Company has executed 240 tenant leases for approximately 2.5 million square feet in its managed portfolio. Examples of the Company's major tenant relationships include: o In 1996, the Company leased 13 sites to Kohl's, a Wisconsin-based retailer seeking to rapidly expand into the Delaware Valley. These 13 properties were part of a joint venture between the Company and Kimco Realty Corp. to re-lease 26 properties leased or owned by the former Clover value retailing subsidiary of Strawbridge & Clothier. o During the last three years, the Company has facilitated the acquisition and/or development of eight Delaware Valley sites on behalf of The Home Depot. In these site acquisitions, the Company acted as developer, owner and/or broker, depending on the situation and the needs of the tenant. S-15
424B518th Page of 167TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 18th
o The Company recently built the first Target store in the Philadelphia metropolitan area at the newly constructed Hillview Shopping Center. The Company is also currently involved in two other Target development projects in the Delaware Valley. Specialty Leasing. In addition to its traditional leasing services, the Company has been an innovator in the development and application of specialty leasing. Specialty leasing consists of utilizing all available space not currently leased to long-term tenants. The Company's Specialty Leasing Group is responsible for the kiosk space within enclosed malls and shopping centers which it manages, as well as the placement of temporary retail tenants into vacant space in enclosed malls and shopping centers. The Company has found that the creative use of specialty leasing can be an important source of incremental revenue in underperforming shopping centers as well as a major enhancement to the shopping atmosphere in an underleased mall. The Specialty Leasing Group is headed by Elaine Berger, who has substantial experience in bringing specialty leasing into traditional retail properties. Intensive Property Management. Retail and multifamily property management services are provided by skilled property management professionals who are organized on a regional basis. Retail property management is headed by William B. Berlin, Vice President, who has over 20 years of experience in the management of retail properties. Reporting to Mr. Berlin are six regional managers, five of whom are responsible for the enclosed malls in particular geographic areas and one of whom is responsible for the shopping centers and smaller properties. Each regional manager is, in turn, responsible for between five and ten shopping centers. All of the Company's managed enclosed malls are managed by an experienced on-site manager; all other retail properties are managed by a centralized group. The Company requires that all of its property managers have earned or be in the process of earning the Certified Shopping Center Manager designation from the International Council of Shopping Centers. The Company's multifamily group manages ten of its multifamily communities and provides asset management for the remaining nine. The Company's hands-on management practices emphasize resident services and resident retention. The Company maintains its primary multifamily management office at its headquarters in Fort Washington, Pennsylvania, and a regional management office in Boca Raton, Florida. The Company's multifamily group is headed by Raymond J. Trost, Vice President, who has 20 years of experience in multifamily property management and has earned the Certified Property Manager and Accredited Resident Manager designations from the Institute of Real Estate Management. Marketing. The Company's managed enclosed malls are staffed by a group of on-site marketing professionals whose goal is to promote the properties with consumers in their local market areas. Print and media advertising, as well as special events and services, are used to draw shoppers to the properties. All of the Company's regional marketing directors hold the Certified Marketing Director designation from the International Council of Shopping Centers. The creation of marketing materials and programs for retail properties is centrally coordinated by the Portfolio Marketing Group (the "PMG"), which is an advertising agency providing promotional and marketing services to the managed properties as well as other third-party clients. The PMG is headed by Cheryl Dougherty, who has over 15 years of experience in shopping center marketing, and is staffed by a team of 12 marketing professionals. The PMG creates and produces media and print work, catalogs and associated collateral materials and allows the Company to capture the profit margin on advertising expenditures. Marketing of the Company's multifamily properties is performed by experienced on-site leasing teams under the direction of one of the Company's regional managers. Occupancy in the Company's multifamily portfolio improved from 95% at August 31, 1996 to 97% at August 31, 1997. In order to improve occupancy, the Company offers its Preferred Employer Program, which targets major area employers and provides incentives to their employees, such as reduced application fees and security deposits and flexible lease terms, for locating in the Company's properties. Other marketing tools utilized by the Company include resident referral programs, internet-based advertising services and local apartment rental guides. S-16
424B519th Page of 167TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 19th
Growth Strategies The Company seeks to increase cash flow by intensively managing its properties and selectively acquiring, repositioning and developing additional retail and multifamily properties. The Company also intends to continue to pursue strategic acquisitions of other real estate companies and portfolios, such as the TRO Transaction, which complement its existing portfolio and management capabilities. Internal Growth Strategies. The Company seeks to increase cash flow at its properties by achieving rent increases while maintaining high occupancy levels and aggressively managing operating expenses. For the four years ended August 31, 1997, the compounded annual growth rate in property-level earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization ("EBITDA") for the Company's multifamily and retail properties was 5.0% and 3.2%, respectively, on a same store basis. Same store performance data is calculated for the 16 multifamily properties and 12 shopping centers owned by the Company throughout the four-year period. The Company believes that by applying its management and leasing skills and experience it can enhance the operating performance of the existing portfolio assets in the following ways: o Increasing Rents. A key aspect of the Company's strategy is to increase base rents to market levels as leases expire. As of August 31, 1997, the Multifamily Properties had an average rent of $595 per month, compared to Company-quoted rents for new leases of $659 per month at such properties. For enclosed mall leases expiring in 1998 in the Existing Retail Properties, the weighted average annual rent was $13.84 per square foot compared to Company-quoted weighted average rents of $14.18 per square foot. These figures exclude Gateway Shopping Center, which was sold on December 17, 1997, and Whitehall Mall, which is being redeveloped to a revised configuration. o Optimizing Tenant Mix. The Company seeks to optimize the tenant mix in its retail properties in order to increase their long-term drawing power and tenant sales, thereby contributing to the Company's ability to maintain and increase rental rates. The primary goal of the Company's retail leasing efforts is to obtain the most productive tenants available in a given trade area, and to maintain the flexibility to adapt to changing trends in consumer tastes and retail demand. o Maintaining High Occupancy Rates. The Company believes that it has been successful in attracting, expanding and retaining retail and multifamily tenants by emphasizing tenant satisfaction and retention. The Company strives to be responsive to the needs of individual tenants through its on-site professional management and maintenance staff and, with respect to retail properties, by providing tenants with flexible leasing alternatives to accommodate their changing space requirements. The Company's success in maintaining and improving occupancy rates is demonstrated, in part, by the Company's consistently high occupancy levels and by the number of existing tenants which have renewed their leases at the Company's properties. As of August 31, 1997, the average occupancy rate for the Company's multifamily and retail portfolio was 97% and 87%, respectively. o Internalizing Outside Property Management and Leasing. Following the TRO Transaction, the Company has the added opportunity to enhance property cash flow by bringing in-house the property management and leasing function for certain of its retail properties now managed by third parties. In these instances, the Company believes that it will be able to internalize the profit margin implicit in these management contracts, as well as more effectively lower operating expenses at such properties as a result of the economies of scale discussed above. In the first quarter of 1998, the Company intends to assume the management of four of its Existing Retail Properties, containing 694,000 square feet, which are currently managed by third parties. With respect to these properties, the Company paid third-party property managers approximately $175,000 in management fees during the year ended August 31, 1997. S-17
424B520th Page of 167TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 20th
Acquisition Strategies The Company's acquisition strategies focus on the purchase of middle market retail properties and multifamily properties which the Company believes will benefit from more proactive management and leasing, selective re-tenanting and strategic capital improvements. The Company also intends to continue to take advantage of its third-party management business to evaluate and selectively acquire properties managed for its third-party clients. The Company intends to execute its strategy in the following ways: o Acquisition of Middle Market Shopping Centers. The Company's strategy includes the acquisition of well-located enclosed shopping malls in middle income markets (trade areas in which average annual household income generally falls between $30,000 and $50,000). In some cases, these centers may be older properties which remain competitive from a functional and location standpoint, but which typically have lower rental rates than the newest properties in their markets and which may require capital improvements and re-tenanting. The Company intends to target primary trade areas with populations in excess of 150,000 in which 20% or more of the population is under the age of 19. The Company seeks to identify markets which exhibit strong potential demand for branded or "fashion" products, but which have few existing retail properties geared toward satisfying such demand. In this manner, the Company uses unsatisfied demand for branded products to drive the re-tenanting and repositioning of its acquired shopping centers, adding a fashion-oriented anchor tenant and/or upgrading the in-line tenant mix. The Company believes that competition to acquire middle market shopping centers in its targeted markets is significantly more limited than that for larger, "trophy" shopping centers. As a result, the Company believes it can acquire shopping centers which meet its investment criteria at attractive capitalization rates and at a discount to replacement cost. For example, the Company recently acquired Magnolia Mall in Florence, South Carolina from an affiliate of Equity Properties and Development Limited Partnership ("EPDLP"). The property is located at the intersection of Interstates 95 and 20 and is the only regional mall within a 70-mile radius. The county in which the mall is located contains 276,000 people, 125,000 of whom are located within 15 miles of the property. The Company's strategy for Magnolia Mall is to take advantage of what it believes is unsatisfied demand for branded products in the trade area by upgrading merchant quality and replacing underperforming retailers with tenants such as Gap and GapKids (scheduled to open February 1998). Further, an opportunity exists to add an additional fashion-oriented anchor tenant to the property. Magnolia Mall was purchased for a gross purchase price (including transaction costs) of $46.4 million, which represents an initial capitalization rate of approximately 9.6% (calculated by dividing EBITDA for the nine months ended September 30, 1997, annualized, by the gross purchase price). o Acquisition of Third-Party Managed Properties. The Company believes that the opportunity exists to continue to acquire certain properties which it currently manages on behalf of various third parties, including the three malls for which it holds a right of first refusal from TRO Affiliates. As the property manager and leasing agent for such properties, the Company is in an advantageous position to evaluate the investment merits of such properties. Moreover, the Company believes it will be in a position to acquire managed properties in negotiated transactions, as opposed to bidding processes. o Corporate and Portfolio Acquisitions. The Company's growth strategy will continue to include the evaluation of strategic acquisitions and/or business combinations with other real estate companies and portfolio owners. The Company believes that the real estate industry is in a period of sustained consolidation, and that opportunities will arise to acquire other real estate companies. In this regard, the Company intends to seek acquisition candidates with portfolios which complement the Company's owned portfolio and where the Company's management skills and those of the target may be combined and then applied to enhance property values. The Company believes that the TRO Transaction and TRO's prior acquisitions of Strouse Greenberg & Co., Inc. and the management business of EPDLP demonstrate the Company's ability to successfully identify, close and integrate strategic corporate and portfolio transactions. S-18
424B521st Page of 167TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 21st
o Acquisition of "Class B" Multifamily Properties. During the period 1992-1994, the Company's acquisition strategy focused on the purchase of "Class B" multifamily properties in the Mid-Atlantic region and in Florida. The Company's market research revealed the following conditions existed at the time: (i) a number of markets were experiencing above average population and job growth as the economy was emerging from the recession of the early 1990's; (ii) new supply of multifamily properties was minimal during the recession; (iii) multifamily properties were available for purchase at significant discounts to their replacement cost; and (iv) many "Class B" multifamily properties were suffering from deferred maintenance due to their owners' inability to raise additional capital. As a result, the Company embarked on an acquisition program focused on "Class B" apartment properties which could be purchased at discounts to replacement cost and which could be upgraded through strategic capital expenditures aimed at increasing occupancy levels and rental rates. During the period 1992-1994, the Company acquired eight properties containing 3,544 units (1,834 wholly owned units and 1,710 units through joint ventures). The initial total investment of the Company and its joint venture partners in these properties was $130.7 million, or $36,871 per unit, including strategic capital improvements made following the initial investments. The average ratio of EBITDA to the Company's total purchase price (including initial capital expenditures) for these properties for the first full year following their purchase was approximately 10.0%. The Company regularly reviews multifamily acquisition opportunities and intends to pursue such acquisitions as market conditions warrant. o Operating Partnership Unit Acquisitions. The Company recently formed the Operating Partnership. As an umbrella partnership REIT, or "UPREIT," the Company will have the ability to acquire properties for OP Units and thereby may provide sellers with deferral of income taxes that would otherwise be payable in a cash sale. The Company believes that its ability to offer tax-efficient transactions to property sellers should significantly expand the universe of potential acquisitions available to the Company, and provides it with a competitive advantage over other potential acquirers who are unable to offer tax-efficient consideration. An example of the Company's successful use of OP Units for acquisitions includes the Company's purchase of Magnolia Mall from an affiliate of EPDLP for consideration which included OP Units. Repositioning and Redevelopment Strategies The Company's ability to reposition and redevelop retail and multifamily properties is a core element of its business and growth strategies. The Company uses its internal redevelopment experience and resources to create value in newly acquired properties, frequently in cases in which the prior owner was unable to maximize the property's value due to a lack of managerial or financial resources. Given its expertise, the Company has the ability to conduct a broad range of redevelopment activities designed to significantly improve the property's operating performance. The Company has redeveloped a number of properties for its own account and for third-party clients, including: Beaver Valley Mall, in Monaca, Pennsylvania; Hudson Mall, in Jersey City, New Jersey; Wayne Towne Center, in Wayne, New Jersey; Cumberland Mall, in Vineland, New Jersey; and most recently Richland Mall, in Quakertown, Pennsylvania. Development of Power Center Retail Properties The Company's property development strategy currently focuses on the construction of retail power centers in its core Mid-Atlantic markets. Power centers are typically open-air centers with at least 250,000 square feet, and usually include at least three "category killer" and/or value-oriented retail anchor tenants. Such anchor tenants typically occupy between 60% and 80% of the total square footage in a power center. The tenant mix in a power center is designed to draw consumers from up to a 15-mile radius, creating a shopping destination. The majority of the Company's power center tenants are national and regional retailers with at least 15,000 to 150,000 square feet offering a variety of products. The Company's development and site selection strategy is tenant-driven, as the Company uses its relationships with key power center tenants such as The Home Depot, Target and Kohl's to identify sites desirable to such retailers. After pre-leasing or pre-selling one or more portions of a targeted site to key anchor tenants, the Company is able to aggressively pre-lease the remaining space to other desirable retail tenants. S-19
424B522nd Page of 167TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 22nd
The Company has significant experience in the adaptive redevelopment of existing facilities in infill locations. Recently, the Company's development group has completed a number of power center projects on sites which were previously underutilized industrial/office locations, including: o Delaware Avenue, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania: a 290,000 square foot center containing The Home Depot, Wal-Mart and McDonalds located on the Philadelphia waterfront. o Northeast Tower Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania: a 484,000 square foot center (of which 121,000 square feet remain to be constructed) including The Home Depot, Staples The Office Superstore, PETsMART and The Pep Boys - Manny, Moe & Jack. o Hillview Center, Cherry Hill, New Jersey: a 340,000 square foot center including Target and Kohl's. For a table summarizing certain developments currently in process, see "The Properties - The Development Properties." Third-Party Business The Company provides management, leasing and/or development services for 49 retail properties (containing approximately 19.2 million square feet) for affiliated and third-party property owners. The Company's third-party clients include institutions such as Aetna Life Insurance Company, The Mutual Life Insurance Company of New York, and an affiliate of ERE Yarmouth. The Company's largest third-party contract is the strategic alliance formed with EPDLP to manage, lease and redevelop 18 retail properties. Each of the management agreements is for a term of ten years and is cancelable only upon a sale of the property. The Company has acquired two properties from affiliates of EPDLP, Magnolia Mall and North Dartmouth Mall, and believes that there may be additional opportunities to acquire assets from this portfolio. PREIT-RUBIN's management agreements typically provide for a one-year term, cancelable upon 30 days' notice, with a fee equal to 3.0% to 5.0% of the shopping center's gross revenues. Leasing fees are paid either as-collected or on a one-time basis. Development services are provided to third-party clients on an hourly basis or a negotiated lump sum basis for the project. See "Risk Factors -- Risks of Third-Party Management Business" in the accompanying Prospectus. PREIT-RUBIN provides real estate development, management, leasing and other services to 28 properties in which Ronald Rubin (the Company's Chief Executive Officer) and/or other TRO Affiliates own interests. These 28 properties consist of: two hotel and mixed use properties; eight office buildings; ten retail properties (eight with two or less tenants) which contain less than 200,000 square feet in the aggregate; the three retail properties for which the TRO Affiliates have granted the Company rights of first refusal (see "The Company -- Right of First Refusal Properties"); the two retail properties which the Company will acquire pursuant to existing agreements (see "The Properties -- Acquisition Properties"); and three parcels of land. The interests of Mr. Rubin and/or the TRO Affiliates in these 28 properties range between 11% and 81%, and Mr. Rubin and/or the TRO Affiliates generally exercise the right to select service providers for all of these properties. The Company determined not to purchase these properties as part of the TRO Transaction, with the exception of the right of first refusal properties and the Acquisition Properties, because of its belief that they are not consistent with the Company's investment strategy. All services provided to these 28 properties are set forth in written agreements which the Company believes are no less favorable to the Company than agreements between the Company and unaffiliated third parties with respect to similar services. Pursuant to Mr. Rubin's employment agreement, Mr. Rubin is required to devote his full working time, energy, skill and best efforts to the performance of his duties to the Company. S-20
424B523rd Page of 167TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 23rd
USE OF PROCEEDS The net proceeds to the Company from the Offering, after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and the estimated expenses of the Offering, are approximately $83.2 million ($95.8 million if the Underwriters' over-allotment option is exercised in full). The Company expects to use the net proceeds of the Offering as follows: (i) approximately $8.8 million for the prepayment of a mortgage loan secured by Cobblestone Apartments in Pompano Beach, Florida (the "Cobblestone Mortgage"); and (ii) approximately $74.4 million for the repayment of amounts outstanding under the Credit Facility. Approximately $66.2 million of the indebtedness under the Credit Facility was incurred to finance various components of the TRO Transaction, including the Company's acquisition of three properties in connection with the TRO Transaction (Magnolia Mall, North Dartmouth Mall and Springfield Park), as well as to fund certain development expenses incurred in connection with the Development Properties. The Company expects to use any remaining net proceeds to fund the construction of the Christiana Power Center, Phase I, and for general corporate purposes. Pending the application of net proceeds from the Offering, the Company will invest such net proceeds in interest-bearing accounts and short-term interest-bearing securities in accordance with the requirements for qualification as a REIT for federal income tax purposes. The Cobblestone Mortgage bears interest at 8.25% and is scheduled to mature by its terms on December 1, 2002. The Credit Facility currently bears interest at LIBOR plus 1.70% and matures on September 30, 1999. PRICE RANGE OF SHARES AND DISTRIBUTIONS The Shares were traded on the American Stock Exchange ("ASE") under the symbol "PEI" prior to November 14, 1997. On November 14, 1997, the Shares commenced trading on the NYSE. The following table sets forth, for the calendar quarters indicated, the high and low closing prices of the Shares on the ASE and NYSE, as applicable, and the distributions declared by the Company per Share for such calendar quarter. · Download Table Distributions High Low Per Share ----------- --------- -------------- 1995 ---- First Quarter ........................... $21 1/4 $18 1/2 $ 0.47 Second Quarter ........................ 23 5/8 19 7/8 0.47 Third Quarter ........................... 21 3/4 20 1/8 0.47 Fourth Quarter ........................ 21 7/8 19 1/4 0.47 1996 ---- First Quarter ........................... 21 3/4 21 1/4 0.47 Second Quarter ........................ 21 5/8 19 0.47 Third Quarter ........................... 21 5/8 18 3/4 0.47 Fourth Quarter ........................ 25 21 0.47 1997 ---- First Quarter ........................... 25 20 3/4 0.47 Second Quarter ........................ 23 3/8 20 7/8 0.47 Third Quarter ........................... 27 1/4 22 1/2 0.47 Fourth Quarter (through December 17) .... 25 9/16 22 0.47 On December 17, 1997, the last reported sale price on the NYSE was $22 3/8. As of November 14, 1997, the Shares were held by approximately 1,400 holders of record. Although the Company currently anticipates that cash distributions will continue to be paid in the future (in March, June, September and December), the payment of future distributions by the Company will be at the discretion of the Board of Trustees and will depend on numerous factors, including the Company's cash flow, its financial condition, capital requirements, annual distribution requirements under the REIT provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code"), and such other factors as the Board of Trustees deems relevant. S-21
424B524th Page of 167TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 24th
CAPITALIZATION The following table sets forth the capitalization of the Company: (i) on an historical basis as of August 31, 1997; (ii) on a pro forma basis assuming, as of such date, the completion of the TRO Transaction; and (iii) on a pro forma basis as adjusted for the Offering and the application of the net proceeds as described under "Use of Proceeds." The information set forth in the following table should be read in conjunction with the Company's consolidated financial statements included herein. · Enlarge/Download Table August 31, 1997 --------------------------------------------- Pro Forma Historical Pro Forma as Adjusted ------------ --------------- ------------ (in thousands) Mortgage loans payable ..................... $ 83,528 $ 108,728 $ 99,881 Credit Facility .............................. 33,884 90,531 16,188 --------- --------- --------- Total debt .............................. 117,412 199,259 116,069 Minority interest ........................... 540 15,672 15,672 Shareholders equity: Preferred Shares of Beneficial Interest, $1.00 par value; 25,000,000 authorized; none issued and outstanding ............... -- -- -- Shares of Beneficial Interest, $1.00 par value, 100,000,000 authorized; 8,685,098 issued and outstanding (8,685,098 pro forma and 12,685,098 pro forma, as adjusted) (1) ........................ 8,685 8,685 12,685 Additional paid in capital .................. 53,599 53,599 132,789 Distributions in excess of net income ...... (21,385) (21,385) (21,385) --------- --------- --------- Total shareholders' equity .................. 40,899 40,899 124,089 --------- --------- --------- Total capitalization .................. $ 158,851 $ 255,830 $ 255,830 ========= ========= ========= ------------ (1) Does not include Shares reserved for issuance upon redemption of 646,286 issued and outstanding OP Units or 933,375 Shares reserved for issuance upon the exercise of options which have been granted by the Company, 314,786 of which are currently exercisable and 618,589 of which become exercisable at various times over the next four years. S-22
424B525th Page of 167TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 25th
SELECTED FINANCIAL AND OPERATING DATA The following table sets forth certain financial and operating information for the Company for each of the five years ended August 31, 1997. Such information should be read in conjunction with the Company's financial statements and the notes thereto, "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" and pro forma financial statements contained elsewhere herein. Effective January 1, 1998, the Company's fiscal year will be reported on a calendar year basis. The unaudited pro forma information is presented as if the Offering and the TRO Transaction had been completed on August 31, 1997 for balance sheet purposes and on September 1, 1996 for purposes of the income statement and other data. The unaudited pro forma information is not necessarily indicative of what the actual financial position or results of operations of the Company would have been as of and for the period presented, nor does it purport to represent the Company's future financial position or results of operations. · Enlarge/Download Table For the Fiscal Years Ended August 31, --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Historical Pro Forma ------------------------------------------------------------------- 1997(1) 1997 1996 1995 1994 1993 ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- (amounts in thousands, except per share data) Income Statement Data: Revenues: Gross revenues from real estate ...... $52,721 $40,231 $38,985 $36,978 $27,640 $21,083 Interest and other income ............ 488 254 171 176 274 542 -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- Total revenues. ..................... 53,209 40,485 39,156 37,154 27,914 21,625 Expenses: Property operating expenses ......... 20,253 16,289 16,102 14,859 11,758 8,959 Depreciation and amortization ......... 8,816 6,259 5,908 5,286 3,541 2,784 General and administrative expenses. ........................... 3,324 3,324 3,119 3,091 2,528 1,873 Interest expense. ..................... 9,167 9,086 9,831 8,908 4,162 2,222 Provision for losses on investments 500 500 -- -- 1,795 320 -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- Total expense ..................... 42,060 35,458 34,960 32,144 23,784 16,158 -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- Income before other income and expense .............................. 11,149 5,027 4,196 5,010 4,130 5,467 Equity in income of partnerships and joint ventures. ..................... 4,757 4,337 6,258 6,381 4,416 4,750 Equity in loss of PREIT-RUBIN ......... (80) -- -- -- -- -- Gains on sales of interests in real estate .............................. 1,069 1,069 865 119 12,362 3,875 Minority interest ..................... (999) (198) (275) (285) (221) (92) -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- Net income ........................... $15,896 $10,235 $11,044 $11,225 $20,687 $14,000 ======== ======== ======== ======== ======== ======== Per Share Results: Income before gains on sales of interests in real estate ............ $1.17 $1.06 $1.17 $1.28 $0.96 $1.17 Gains on sales of interests in real estate .............................. .08 0.12 0.10 0.01 1.43 0.45 --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- Net income ........................... $1.25 $1.18 $1.27 $1.29 $2.39 $1.62 ========= ========= ========= ========= ========= ========= Weighted average number of shares outstanding (2) ..................... 12,679 8,679 8,676 8,671 8,664 8,643 S-23
424B526th Page of 167TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 26th
· Enlarge/Download Table For the Fiscal Years Ended August 31, ------------------------------- Historical Pro Forma ------------- 1997(1) 1997 ---------------- ------------- (amounts in thousands, except per share and property data) Balance Sheet Data (at end of period): Investments in real estate, at cost ...... $ 284,765 $ 202,443 Total assets. ........................... 262,636 165,657 Total debt .............................. 116,069 117,412 Minority interest ........................ 15,672 540 Shareholders' equity ..................... 124,089 40,899 Other Data: Cash flows from operating activities....... (3) 15,219 Cash flows from investing activities....... (3) 7,749 Cash flows from financing activities....... (3) (22,599) Funds from operations (4) ............... 29,171 19,660 EBITDA (5). .............................. 48,719 35,169 Total leasable square footage of retail properties (at end of period)...... 5,968,000 4,470,000 Total multifamily units (at end of period) ................................. 7,236 7,236 Number of properties (at end of period): Retail ................................. 17 15 Multifamily .............................. 19 19 Percentage leased (at end of period): Retail ................................. 89% 87% Multifamily .............................. 97% 97% For the Fiscal Years Ended August 31, ---------------------------------------------------------- 1996 1995 1994 1993 ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- (amounts in thousands, except per share and property data) Balance Sheet Data (at end of period): Investments in real estate, at cost ...... $ 198,542 $ 195,929 $ 154,281 $ 112,262 Total assets. ........................... 177,725 181,336 142,495 107,854 Total debt .............................. 124,148 122,518 80,155 51,929 Minority interest ........................ 542 528 408 331 Shareholders' equity ..................... 46,505 51,771 56,748 51,852 Other Data: Cash flows from operating activities ...... 15,090 16,672 15,909 13,034 Cash flows from investing activities ...... 933 (40,082) (18,524) (38,683) Cash flows from financing activities ...... (16,091) 22,356 3,305 25,913 Funds from operations (4) ............... 18,628 18,963 16,417 16,870 EBITDA (5). .............................. 34,423 33,936 24,854 27,161 Total leasable square footage of retail properties (at end of period) ..... 4,806,000 4,866,000 4,798,000 5,527,000 Total multifamily units (at end of period) ................................. 7,236 7,337 6,815 6,107 Number of properties (at end of period): Retail ................................. 18 18 19 22 Multifamily .............................. 19 20 19 17 Percentage leased (at end of period): Retail ................................. 90% 92% 90% 90% Multifamily .............................. 95% 96% 95% 97% ------------ (1) See Notes to Management's Assumptions to Unaudited Pro Forma Consolidating Balance Sheet and Consolidated Income Statement contained elsewhere herein. (2) Weighted average number of Shares outstanding excludes Shares issuable upon conversion of outstanding OP Units and includes the dilutive effect of outstanding options. Income allocable to holders of OP Units is included in minority interest. (3) Pro forma information relating to cash flows from operating, investing and financing activities has not been included because the Company believes that the information would not be meaningful due to the number of assumptions required in order to calculate such information. (4) The White Paper on Funds from Operations approved by the Board of Governors of NAREIT in March 1995 defines Funds from Operations as net income (loss) (computed in accordance with GAAP), excluding gains (or losses) from debt restructuring and sales of properties, plus real estate related depreciation and amortization and after adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures. The Company believes that Funds from Operations is helpful to investors as a measure of the performance of an equity REIT because, along with cash flows from operating activities, financing activities, and investing activities, it provides investors with an indication of the ability of the Company to incur and service debt, to make capital expenditures and to fund other cash needs. The Company computes Funds from Operations in accordance with standards established by NAREIT which may not be comparable to Funds from Operations reported by other REITs that do not define the term in accordance with the current NAREIT definition or that interpret the current NAREIT definition differently than the Company. Funds from Operations does not represent cash generated from operating activities in accordance with GAAP and should not be considered as an alternative to net income (determined in accordance with GAAP) as an indication of the Company's financial performance or to cash flow from operating activities (determined in accordance with GAAP) as a measure of the Company's liquidity, nor is it indicative of funds available to fund the Company's cash needs, including its ability to make cash distributions. (5) EBITDA is defined as operating income before interest expense, income taxes, depreciation and amortization. The Company believes EBITDA is useful to investors as an indicator of the Company's ability to service debt and pay cash distributions. EBITDA, as calculated by the Company, may not be comparable to EBITDA reported by other REITs that do not define EBITDA exactly as the Company defines the term. EBITDA does not represent cash generated from operating activities determined in accordance with GAAP and should not be considered as an alternative to operating income or net income determined in accordance with GAAP as an indicator of performance or as an alternative to cash flows from operating activities as an indicator of liquidity. S-24
424B527th Page of 167TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 27th
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company and the notes thereto contained elsewhere herein. Overview The following discussion is based on the consolidated financial statements of the Company and compares the results of operations of the Company for the fiscal year ended August 31, 1997 with the results of operations of the Company for the fiscal year ended August 31, 1996, and the results of operations of the Company for the fiscal year ended August 31, 1996 with the results of operations of the Company for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1995. The discussion set forth in "Results of Operations" below does not include the effects of the TRO Transaction, which occurred on September 30, 1997. Results of Operations Fiscal 1997 Compared With Fiscal 1996 Gross revenues from real estate for the fiscal year ended August 31, 1997 increased by 3% to $40.2 million from $39.0 million in the prior year. The 1997 period included $0.4 million of revenues attributable to Forestville Plaza in which the Company acquired its partners' remaining 25% interest in the prior fiscal year. The 1996 period included $0.5 million of revenues attributable to Chateau Apartments which the Company sold in June 1996. Revenues from properties owned during both periods increased by $1.0 million primarily as a result of increases in apartment revenues. Operating expenses for the fiscal year ended August 31, 1997 increased 1% to $16.3 million from $16.1 million in the prior year. The 1997 period included $0.2 million of expenses attributable to Forestville Plaza in which the Company acquired its partners' remaining 25% interest in the prior fiscal year. The 1996 period included $0.3 million of expenses attributable to Chateau Apartments which the Company sold. Operating expenses from properties owned during both periods increased by $0.3 million. Depreciation and amortization for the fiscal year ended August 31, 1997 increased by 7% to $6.3 million from $5.9 million in 1996, primarily as a result of ongoing capital expenditures in apartments. General and administrative expenses increased by 6% to $3.3 million from $3.1 million in 1996, primarily as a result of costs associated with litigation with a partner. Mortgage and bank loan interest expense decreased by 8% to $9.1 million from $9.8 million in 1996, primarily as a result of decreased borrowing against the Company's credit facility. In fiscal year 1996, a partnership in which the Company has a 50% interest signed an option to sell a parcel of land at a stipulated price, subject to the buyer's obtaining certain zoning variance approvals. In fiscal year 1997, the option expired. As a result, management revised its estimate of the property's selling price and recorded a $0.5 million provision for investment losses to reduce the property held for sale to its estimated net realizable value. Equity in income of partnerships and joint ventures decreased in the fiscal year ended August 31, 1997, by 32% to $4.3 million from $6.3 million in 1996, primarily as a result of an increase in mortgage interest expense of $2.9 million ($1.8 million of which was the Company's proportional share). The increase in partnership mortgage interest expense is attributable to prepayment fees of $1.9 million ($1.1 million of which was the Company's proportional share) in connection with refinancings, as well as additional interest expense associated with the refinancings, of Regency Apartments, Lehigh Valley Mall and Cambridge Hall Apartments in 1997. In addition, equity in income from properties owned during both periods exclusive of the increase in mortgage interest mentioned above increased by $0.5 million. Net income for the fiscal year ended August 31, 1997 before gains on sales of interests in real estate decreased 10% to $9.2 million from $10.2 million for the comparable period in 1996. In fiscal year 1997, net gains on the sales of interests in real estate were $1.1 million, as compared to $0.9 million in 1996. The net S-25
424B528th Page of 167TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 28th
gains on sales of interests in real estate of $1.1 million in 1997 consisted of gains on the sale of the Company's joint venture interest in shopping centers in Lancaster, Beaver Falls and Waynesburg, PA of $1.5 million, offset by a loss on the sale of a shopping Center in Margate, FL of $0.4 million. The gains in 1996 totaling $0.9 million were derived from the sale of land in Bucks County, PA and the sale of the Chateau Apartments in Midland, TX. In 1997, net income was reduced by an accounting provision of $0.5 million for losses on land held for sale in the Company's investment portfolio and prepayment fees of $1.9 million paid in connection with refinancing of two partnership properties, the Company's share of which was $1.1 million. Fiscal 1996 Compared With Fiscal 1995 Gross revenues from real estate for the fiscal year ended August 31, 1996 increased by 5% to $39.0 million from $37.0 million in 1995. The increase is due primarily to an increase in revenues of $1.2 million from the Boca Palms Apartments, which was acquired in November 1994 and $0.4 million from Forestville Plaza which became wholly owned during the year. Exclusive of Boca Palms Apartments and Forestville Plaza, revenues from properties owned during both periods increased 2% to $33.7 in 1996 from $33.1 million in 1995. Operating expenses in the fiscal year ended August 31, 1996 increased by 8% to $16.1 million from $14.9 million in 1995. The increase is due primarily to $0.4 million of increased expenses from the Boca Palms Apartments, approximately $0.2 million of additional operating expenses as a result of the harsh winter weather in the Mid-Atlantic region and $0.1 million attributable to the increased ownership of Forestville Plaza. Depreciation and amortization increased by 13% to $5.9 million from $5.3 million in 1995, primarily as a result of the acquisition of Boca Palms, the remaining interest in Forestville Plaza, and ongoing capital expenditures. Interest expense increased by 11% to $9.9 million from $8.9 million in 1995 as a result of increased borrowings to finance the Boca Palms acquisition and for general corporate purposes. For fiscal year ended August 31, 1996, $0.7 million was charged against the allowance for investment losses, $0.3 million for carrying costs for land held for sale, and $0.4 million of development expenses incurred at Crest Plaza, Allentown, Pennsylvania, for a potential expansion of the shopping center, including a Caldor store. The lease with Caldor was canceled and the cost was written off following a bankruptcy declaration by Caldor. Equity in income of partnerships and joint ventures decreased by 2% to $6.3 million from $6.4 million in 1995, primarily as a result of a non-recurring lease termination fee received from a shopping center tenant in the amount of $0.2 million for fiscal year 1995. The Company's share of partnership and joint venture income in 1996 was also reduced by approximately $0.1 million as compared to the prior year due to higher operating expenses resulting from the harsh winter weather discussed earlier. Net income for the fiscal year ended August 31, 1996, before gains on sales of interests in real estate, decreased by 8% to $10.2 million from $11.1 million for the comparable period in 1995. In the 1996 period, the gains on the sales of interests in real estate were $0.9 million as compared to the 1995 period which included a gain on sale of interest in real estate of $0.1 million. Net income was reduced by an increase in operating expenses of $0.3 million primarily due to winter conditions in the Mid-Atlantic region and the receipt in the prior year of $0.2 million as a non-recurring termination fee from a shopping center tenant. Liquidity and Capital Resources The Company expects to meet its short-term liquidity requirements generally through its available working capital and net cash provided by operations. The Company believes that the net cash provided by operations will be sufficient to allow the Company to make any distributions necessary to enable the Company to continue to qualify as a REIT under the Code. The Company also believes that the foregoing sources of liquidity will be sufficient to fund its short-term liquidity needs for the foreseeable future, including capital expenditures, tenant improvements and leasing commissions. S-26
424B529th Page of 167TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 29th
The Company expects to meet certain long-term liquidity requirements such as property acquisitions, scheduled debt maturities, renovations, expansions and other non-recurring capital improvements through long-term secured and unsecured indebtedness and the issuance of additional equity securities. The Company also expects to use funds available under its $150.0 million Credit Facility to fund acquisitions, development activities and capital improvements on an interim basis. In addition to amounts due under the Credit Facility and under the Term Loan (as hereinafter defined), during the next three years mortgage loans secured by properties owned by three partnerships in which the Company has an interest mature by their terms. Balloon payments on these loans total $17.0 million, of which the Company's proportionate share is $8.5 million. The Credit Facility Coincident with the closing of the TRO Transaction, the Operating Partnership entered into the Credit Facility with a group of banks led by CoreStates Bank, N.A. The obligations of the Operating Partnership under the Credit Facility have been guaranteed by the Company. The Credit Facility is for an initial term of two years and bears interest, at the borrower's election, at: (i) the higher of CoreStates' prime rate, or the Federal Funds lending rate, plus 0.5%, in each case as in effect from time to time; or (ii) 30-day LIBOR plus margins ranging from 1.1% to 1.7%, depending on the ratio of the Company's consolidated liabilities to gross asset value (the "Leverage Ratio"), each as determined pursuant to the terms of the Credit Facility. The Credit Facility contains affirmative and negative covenants customarily found in facilities of this type, as well as requirements that the Company maintain, on a consolidated basis: (i) a maximum Leverage Ratio of 65%; (ii) a maximum ratio of Senior Liabilities (as defined in the Credit Facility agreement) to Unencumbered Asset Value (as defined in the Credit Facility agreement) of 73%; (iii) minimum tangible net worth of $115.0 million; (iv) a minimum ratio of annualized consolidated property net operating income to total annual debt service of 1.40:1; and (v) a minimum ratio of annualized consolidated property net operating income to pro forma debt service of 1.30:1. As of September 30, 1997, the Company's Leverage Ratio was approximately 58%. As long as the Leverage Ratio is 50% or greater, the lending banks will hold unrecorded mortgages on 11 unencumbered properties which the Operating Partnership owns, directly or indirectly, and would be entitled to record such mortgages upon any event of default. Immediately following the Offering, the Company's Leverage Ratio will be 43%. As of September 30, 1997, the Operating Partnership had drawn $95.0 million on the Credit Facility, which was used to repay amounts outstanding on the Company's prior credit facility and to fund the cash portion of the TRO Transaction referred to in Note 10 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company contained elsewhere herein. Secured Term Loan In addition to the Credit Facility, the Company previously borrowed $35.0 million (the "Term Loan") from a bank group at a fixed rate of 8.62% until March 1998, at which time the rate is to be reset at either a fixed or floating rate at the option of the Company. The loan is secured by three apartment properties, had a balance of $34.0 million on August 31, 1997, and matures in March 1998. The Company may, at its option, extend the maturity of this loan for two additional one year periods upon the satisfaction of certain specified conditions. The Company believes that it satisfies all of the conditions for these optional extensions. S-27
424B530th Page of 167TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 30th
Schedule of Indebtedness As of September 30, 1997, certain of the Company's properties are subject to mortgage indebtedness as set forth below: · Download Table Percentage Interest Property Location Owned Rate(1) ------------------------- --------------------- ------------ -------------- Multifamily Properties: Camp Hill Camp Hill, PA 100% 9.50% Cobblestone Pompano Beach, FL 100% 7.75(5) Shenandoah Village West Palm Beach, FL 100% 5.90 Emerald Point Virginia Beach, VA 65%(4) 6.79 Cambridge Hall West Chester, PA 50% 8.35 Altamonte Springs, Charter Pointe FL 40%(4) 7.50 Countrywood Tampa, FL 50%(4) 8.00 Eagle's Nest Coral Springs, FL 50% 8.24 Fox Run Phase 1 Bear, DE 50% 7.75 Phase 2 Bear, DE 50% 8.38 Phase 3 Bear, DE 50% 7.28 Fox Run Warminster Warminster, PA 50% 7.88 Regency Lakeside Omaha, NE 50%(4) 7.56 Will-O-Hill Reading, PA 50% 7.75 Subtotal Multifamily Properties Retail Properties: Magnolia Mall Florence, SC 100% 8.20 Mandarin Corners Jacksonville, FL 100% 9.13 Ingleside Center Thorndale, PA 50% 7.50 Ingleside Center Thorndale, PA 100% 7.50 Laurel Mall Hazleton, PA 40% 7.63 Lehigh Valley Mall Allentown, PA 50% 7.90 Court at Oxford Valley Langhorne, PA 50% 8.02 Park Plaza Pinellas Park, FL 50% 7.75 Palmer Park Mall Easton, PA 50% 80% of Prime Palmer Park Mall Easton, PA 50% 8.75 Palmer Park Mall Easton, PA 50% LIBOR + 1.75% Punta Gorda Mall Punta Gorda, FL 25% 10.25 Rio Mall Rio Grande, NJ 50% 8.63 Subtotal Existing Retail Properties Other Debt: Line of Credit 100% LIBOR + 1.70% Secured Term Loan 100% 8.62 Palmer Park Bank Loan 50% 8.5% Subtotal Other Debt: Total/Weighted Average 7.78%
424B531st Page of 167TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 31st
· Enlarge/Download Table Estimated Estimated Principal Annual Debt Balance Due on Property Balance(2) Service Maturity Date(3) Maturity ------------------------- ------------------- -------------- ------------------ --------------- Multifamily Properties: Camp Hill $ 6,737,087 $ 760,116 3/1/07 $ 4,919,623 Cobblestone 8,832,268 798,792 12/1/02 8,154,842 Shenandoah Village 8,640,000 597,960 10/1/25 -- Emerald Point 16,872,414(6) 1,424,412 3/1/08 12,446,206 Cambridge Hall 2,686,227 246,078 10/1/16 1,665,051 Charter Pointe 2,194,066 220,411 2/1/06 1,547,768 Countrywood 3,119,948 346,286 9/1/03 2,378,452 Eagle's Nest 7,881,655 763,037 11/1/00 7,470,894 Fox Run Phase 1 2,143,671 252,702 12/1/98 2,091,469 Phase 2 2,332,305 245,436 12/1/98 2,286,373 Phase 3 2,800,024 265,205 11/1/00 2,714,376 Fox Run Warminster 1,901,551 198,882 8/1/05 1,373,482 Regency Lakeside 10,188,529 865,093 2/1/07 8,924,075 Will-O-Hill 895,082 101,436 8/1/12 -- ---------------- ------------ ------------- Subtotal Multifamily Properties 77,224,827 7,085,846 55,972,611 ---------------- ------------ ------------- Retail Properties: Magnolia Mall 25,153,992 2,597,726 2/1/07 17,904,398 Mandarin Corners 8,398,637 1,002,192 8/1/08 4,064,056 Ingleside Center 672,030 106,416 9/1/06 -- Ingleside Center 884,736 148,536 8/1/00 626,193 Laurel Mall 10,587,224 1,155,000 12/1/03 8,832,000 Lehigh Valley Mall 26,671,938 2,479,260 10/1/06 21,750,439 Court at Oxford Valley 24,616,800 2,319,426 7/10/11 15,966,965 Park Plaza 135,421 75,915 9/7/99 -- Palmer Park Mall 293,284 78,107 3/25/98 279,583 Palmer Park Mall 1,411,415 301,620 10/1/03 -- Palmer Park Mall 938,960 69,577 3/25/98 938,960 Punta Gorda Mall 536,039 69,480 2/1/98 532,375 Rio Mall 210,809 103,845 12/1/99 -- ---------------- ------------ ------------- Subtotal Existing 100,511,286 10,507,100 70,894,969 Retail Properties ---------------- ------------ ------------- Other Debt: Line of Credit 95,319,437 7,015,000 9/30/99 95,319,437 Secured Term Loan 33,926,568 3,400,000 3/20/98 33,926,568 Palmer Park Bank Loan 510,558 112,062 1/1/00 350,313 ---------------- ------------ ------------- Subtotal Other Debt: 129,246,005 10,415,000 129,246,005 ---------------- ------------ ------------- Total/Weighted Average $ 307,492,676 $ 28,007,946 $ 256,113,585 ================ ============ ============= ------------ (1) Effective rate at September 30, 1997. (2) Represents the Company's proportionate share of principal balance. (3) As of September 30, 1997, the weighted average maturity of the Company's mortgage indebtedness was 7.6 years. (4) The Company's share of net cash flows from this property may be greater than its stated percentage interest because of certain preferred return provisions in the respective partnership agreements. Amounts shown as percentage owned in this this table represent the Company's share of net cash flow to which it is entitled after distribution of preferred returns to all partners. (5) Increased to 8.25% on December 1, 1997. (6) Represents 100% of debt secured by property; the Company's proportionate share is 65%; minority interest is 35%. S-28
424B532nd Page of 167TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 32nd
Interest Rate Protection In order to reduce exposure to variable interest rates, in March 1995 the Company purchased a three-year interest rate cap on $15.0 million of indebtedness limiting the underlying 30-day LIBOR rate to 7.5% until March 1998. In June 1995, the Company entered into a six-year interest rate swap agreement with CoreStates Bank, N.A. on $20.0 million of indebtedness which fixes a rate of 6.12% per annum versus 30-day LIBOR until 2001. As a result of these transactions, the Company has fixed or hedged $35.0 million of the outstanding balance on its Credit Facility as of August 31, 1997. Contingent Liability The Company, along with certain of its joint venture partners, has guaranteed debt totaling $16.0 million, (See Notes 2 and 3 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company contained elsewhere herein.) Cash Flows Net cash provided by operating activities increased by approximately 1% to $15.2 million for the year ended August 31, 1997 as compared to $15.1 million the same period last year. Operating cash flow was higher primarily as a result of timing of collections of receivables. Net cash provided by investing activities was $7.7 million for the year ended August 31, 1997 as compared to $0.9 million in the same period last year. For the year ended August 31, 1997, the Company refinanced two properties and received $15.4 million, sold interests in four shopping centers and received proceeds of $2.1 million, invested $6.2 million in real estate and incurred deposits to acquire real estate of $5.3 million. For the year ended August 31, 1996, the Company sold two properties and received net cash proceeds of $5.2 million. Net cash used in financing activities increased by 40% to $22.6 million for the year ended August 31, 1997 as compared to $16.1 million in the same period last year. Financing activities included a $5.4 million reduction in bank loans payable and distributions paid to shareholders of $16.3 million. Financing activities in 1996 included proceeds of a mortgage note payable on Shenandoah Village Apartments of $8.8 million, a $5.0 million reduction in bank loans payable and distributions paid to shareholders of $16.3 million. Funds from Operations The White Paper on Funds from Operations approved by the Board of Governors of NAREIT in March 1995 defines Funds from Operations as net income (loss) (computed in accordance with GAAP), excluding gains (or losses) from debt restructuring and sales of properties, plus real estate related depreciation and amortization and after adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures. The Company believes that Funds from Operations is helpful to investors as a measure of the performance of an equity REIT because, along with cash flow from operating activities, financing activities, and investing activities, it provides investors with an indication of the ability of the Company to incur and service debt, to make capital expenditures and to fund other cash needs. The Company computes Funds from Operations in accordance with standards established by NAREIT which may not be comparable to Funds from Operations reported by other REITs that do not define the term in accordance with the current NAREIT definition or that interpret the current NAREIT definition differently than the Company. Funds from Operations does not represent cash generated from operating activities in accordance with GAAP and should not be considered as an alternative to net income (determined in accordance with GAAP) as an indication of the Company's financial performance or to cash flow from operating activities (determined in accordance with GAAP) as a measure of the Company's liquidity, nor is it indicative of funds available to fund the Company's cash needs, including its ability to make cash distributions. S-29
424B533rd Page of 167TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 33rd
Funds from Operations for each of the previous five fiscal years were as follows: · Enlarge/Download Table For the Fiscal Years Ended August 31, -------------------------------------------------------------------- 1997 1996 1995 1994 1993 ----------- ----------- ----------- ------------ ----------- (in thousands) Net income ............................................. $ 10,235 $11,044 $11,225 $ 20,687 $ 14,000 Less: Gains on sales of interests in real estate ...... (1,069) (865) (119) (12,362) (3,875) Plus: Provision for losses ............................. 500 -- -- 1,795 320 Depreciation and amortization Wholly owned and consolidated partnerships........ 5,989 5,650 5,044 3,322 2,685 Unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures.... 3,380 3,334 3,214 3,229 4,119 Refinancing prepayment fees ........................ 1,133 -- -- -- -- Less: Depreciation of non-real estate assets ............ (222) (202) (173) (146) (104) Amortization of deferred financing costs .......... (286) (333) (228) (108) (275) -------- ------- ------- --------- -------- Funds from operations ................................. $ 19,660 $18,628 $18,963 $ 16,417 $ 16,870 ======== ======= ======= ========= ======== Capital Expenditures During fiscal 1997, the Company made $3.6 million in capital expenditures: $2.9 million for multifamily communities ($502 per unit owned, adjusted for partnership interests) and $0.7 million for shopping centers. The Company's policy is to capitalize expenditures for items which are expected to have useful lives exceeding one year, such as floor coverings, appliances and major exterior preparation and painting for apartments. During fiscal 1997, $0.8 million ($171 per unit owned) was expended for floor covering and $0.3 million ($71 per unit owned) for appliances. In addition, the Company made $1.2 million in non-recurring improvements to multifamily communities in 1997 which included $0.7 million for exterior preparation and painting. Inflation Inflation can have many effects on the financial performance of the Company. Shopping center leases often provide for the payment of rents based on a percentage of sales which may increase with inflation. Leases may also require tenants to bear all or a portion of operating expenses, which may reduce the impact of expense increases on the Company. Apartment leases normally provide for a one-year term, which may allow the Company to seek increased rents as leases are renewed or when new tenants are obtained. S-30
424B534th Page of 167TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 34th
THE PROPERTIES The Existing Retail Properties The Company has interests in the 17 Existing Retail Properties containing an aggregate of approximately 6.0 million square feet. The Company currently manages two of its wholly owned properties and expects to manage the remaining four wholly owned properties by the end of the first quarter of 1998. The Company's 11 joint venture retail properties are managed by the Company's joint venture partners, or an entity designated by the Company and the partner, and in most such instances a change in the management of the property requires the concurrence of both partners. Eight of the 17 Existing Retail Properties containing an aggregate of approximately 3.7 million square feet are located in Pennsylvania and four containing an aggregate of approximately 0.6 million square feet are located in Florida. S-31
424B535th Page of 167TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 35th
The following table sets forth certain information regarding the 17 Existing Retail Properties as of (or for the fiscal year ended) August 31, 1997: · Enlarge/Download Table Year Total Owned Percentage Built/ Square Square Percentage Property Name Location Owned Renovated(1) Feet(2) Feet Leased(3) ----------------------------- ------------------ ------------ -------------- ----------- --------- ------------ Lehigh Valley Mall Allentown, PA 50% 1977/1996 1,054,000 489,000 99% Court at Oxford Valley(5) Langhorne, PA 50% 1996 692,000 457,000 100 North Dartmouth Mall North Dartmouth, 100% 1971/1987 620,000 620,000 88 MA Whitehall Mall Allentown, PA 50% 1964/1982 603,000 521,000 84 Magnolia Mall Florence, SC 100% 1979/1992 570,000 570,000 98 Laurel Mall Hazleton, PA 40% 1973/1995 558,000 558,000 97 Palmer Park Mall(6) Easton, PA 50% 1972/1982 349,000 349,000 68 Forestville Shopping Center Forestville, MD 100% 1974/1983 218,000 218,000 73 Mandarin Corners Jacksonville, FL 100% 1986 216,000 216,000 99 Springfield Park(7) Springfield, PA 50% 1963/1997 209,000 65,000 N/A Rio Mall Rio Grande, NJ 50% 1973/1992 161,000 161,000 73 In-Line Stores Property Average Base Revenue- Principal Rent Per Property Company's Property Property Name Tenants Base Rent Square Foot(4) Revenue Share EBITDA ----------------------------- ------------------- ------------- ---------------- ------------- ------------ ------------- Lehigh Valley Mall J.C. Penney, $10,189,000 $ 21.75 $14,840,000 $7,420,000 $10,183,000 Strawbridge's, Macy's Court at Oxford Valley(5) Dick's Clothing & 7,048,000 14.65 8,125,000 4,062,000 6,367,000 Sporting Goods, Best Buy, Phar- Mor, HomePlace, The Home Depot, BJ Wholesale Club North Dartmouth Mall J.C. Penney, 3,977,000 23.52 6,268,000 6,268,000 4,047,000 Sears, Ames, General Cinema Theatres Whitehall Mall Sears, Kohl's 2,186,000 11.37 3,940,000 1,970,000 2,212,000 Magnolia Mall J.C. Penney, 4,097,000 20.00 6,222,000 6,222,000 4,511,000 Sears, Belk, Rose's Laurel Mall Boscov's Dept. 3,609,000 10.44 4,915,000 1,966,000 3,262,000 Store, Kmart, J.C. Penney Palmer Park Mall(6) The Bon-Ton, 2,036,000 14.19 2,868,000 1,434,000 1,828,000 Eckerd Drug Store Forestville Shopping Center Ames 638,000 6.44 766,000 766,000 462,000 Mandarin Corners Wal-Mart, 1,671,000 10.72 1,984,000 1,984,000 1,517,000 Upton's, Carmike Cinemas Springfield Park(7) Target N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Rio Mall Kmart, Staples 462,000 12.25 768,000 384,000 294,000 The Office Superstore Property EBITDA- Company's Property Name Share ----------------------------- ----------- Lehigh Valley Mall $5,092,000 Court at Oxford Valley(5) 3,183,000 North Dartmouth Mall 4,047,000 Whitehall Mall 1,106,000 Magnolia Mall 4,511,000 Laurel Mall 1,305,000 Palmer Park Mall(6) 914,000 Forestville Shopping Center 462,000 Mandarin Corners 1,517,000 Springfield Park(7) N/A Rio Mall 147,000 S-32
424B536th Page of 167TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 36th
· Enlarge/Download Table Year Total Percentage Built/ Square Property Name Location Owned Renovated(1) Feet(2) ---------------------------- ------------------- ------------ -------------- ----------- Crest Plaza Allentown, PA 100% 1959/1991 153,000 Park Plaza Shopping Center Pinellas Park, FL 50% 1963/1983 151,000 South Blanding Village Jacksonville, FL 100% 1986 107,000 Ormond Beach Mall Daytona 25% 1966/1991 103,000 Beach, FL Ingleside Center Thorndale, PA 70%(8) 1981/1995 102,000 Punta Gorda Mall Punta Gorda, FL 25% 1965/1992 102,000 --------- Total/weighted average 5,968,000 ========= In-Line Stores Owned Average Base Square Percentage Principal Rent Per Property Property Name Feet Leased(3) Tenants Base Rent Square Foot(4) Revenue ---------------------------- ----------- ------------ ------------------- ------------- ---------------- ------------- Crest Plaza 153,000 83% Weis Market, $ 866,000 $ 6.30 $ 1,001,000 Eckerd Drug Store Park Plaza Shopping Center 151,000 95 Eckerd Drug 695,000 6.52 900,000 Store, Ace Hardware, Publix Supermarket South Blanding Village 107,000 94 Food Lion, 687,000 8.24 839,000 Scotty's Ormond Beach Mall 103,000 94 Belk-Lindsey, 345,000 5.43 512,000 Publix Supermarket, Eckerd Drug Store Ingleside Center 102,000 100 Kmart 444,000 N/A 448,000 Punta Gorda Mall 102,000 87 Beall's, Publix 340,000 5.30 612,000 Supermarket, Eckerd Drug Store --------- ---- ----------- ----------- Total/weighted average 4,942,000 89.2% $39,290,000 $55,008,000 ========= ---- =========== =========== Property Property Revenue- EBITDA- Company's Property Company's Property Name Share EBITDA Share ---------------------------- ------------- ------------- ------------ Crest Plaza $ 1,001,000 $ 719,000 $ 719,000 Park Plaza Shopping Center 450,000 626,000 313,000 South Blanding Village 839,000 593,000 593,000 Ormond Beach Mall 128,000 344,000 86,000 Ingleside Center 314,000 430,000 301,000 Punta Gorda Mall 153,000 408,000 102,000 ----------- ----------- ----------- Total/weighted average $35,361,000 $37,803,000 $24,398,000 =========== =========== =========== -------- (1) Year initially completed and, where applicable, the most recent year in which the property was substantially renovated or an additional phase of the property was completed. (2) Total Square Feet includes space owned or ground leased by anchors, and Owned Square Feet and Percent Leased excludes such space. (3) Percent Leased is calculated as a percent of Owned Square Feet for which leases were in effect as of August 31, 1997. (4) Excludes space not owned by the Company and space subject to ground leases. (5) Rent, Revenue and EBITDA for The Court at Oxford Valley are based on annualized results for the nine months ended September 30, 1997. (6) Includes an 82,000 square foot Clover store currently vacant. (7) The Company owns an undivided one-half interest as a tenant in common in one of three floors in this former department store currently vacant and under development. Its share of reconstruction costs is approximately 15%. (8) Represents a weighted average. The Company owns 100% of a portion of the center and has a 50% interest in the partnership which owns the remaining portion of the center. S-33
424B537th Page of 167TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 37th
The following table sets forth certain information, as of September 30, 1997, regarding principal tenants in the Existing Retail Properties: Principal Tenants · Enlarge/Download Table Square Footage Square Footage Total Square Number of Owned Leased Footage Tenant Name(1) Stores By Tenant By Tenant Occupied ---------------------------------- ----------- ---------------- ---------------- ------------- Ace Hardware 1 -- 20,000 20,000 Ames 2 -- 166,123 166,123 BJ Wholesale Club 1 -- 105,000 105,000 Beall's 1 -- 22,000 22,000 Belk 1 -- 119,046 119,046 Belk-Lindsey 1 -- 14,000 14,000 Best Buy 1 -- 59,495 59,495 The Bon-Ton 1 -- 82,500 82,500 Boscov's Department Store 1 -- 183,000 183,000 Dick's Clothing & Sporting Goods 1 -- 63,115 63,115 Eckerd Drug Store 5 -- 57,500 57,500 Food Lion 1 -- 29,000 29,000 The Home Depot 1 -- 130,000 130,000 HomePlace 1 -- 54,096 54,096 J.C. Penney 4 188,000 254,359 442,359 Kmart Corp. 3 -- 263,000 263,000 Kohl's(2) 1 82,000 -- 82,000 Macy's 1 212,000 -- 212,000 Phar-Mor(3) 1 -- 45,621 45,621 Publix Supermarket 3 -- 106,000 106,000 Rose's 1 -- 53,000 53,000 Scotty's 1 -- 45,000 45,000 Sears 3 -- 412,604 412,604 Staples The Office Superstore 1 -- 20,000 20,000 Strawbridge's 1 165,000 -- 165,000 Target 1 140,000 -- 140,000 Upton's(4) 1 -- 51,800 51,800 Wal-Mart 1 -- 82,000 82,000 Weis Market 1 45,000 45,000 -- ------- --------- --------- Total 43 787,000 2,483,259 3,270,259 == ======= ========= ========= ------------ (1) Actual tenant may be an affiliate of the entity listed. (2) Subleased to Kohl's by Kimco Realty Corp. (3) Subleased to Phar-Mor by an affiliate of Melville Realty Corporation. (4) Subleased to Upton's by J. Byron. S-34
424B538th Page of 167TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 38th
Set forth below is a description of each of the Existing Retail Properties: Lehigh Valley Mall. Lehigh Valley Mall is a 1.1 million square foot, two-level, enclosed regional mall located in Allentown, Pennsylvania at the intersection of Route 22 and Route 145 (MacArthur Road). The mall originally opened in 1977, and the Company completely renovated the mall's common areas in 1996 with the addition of marble floors, new brighter lighting, landscaping, ceiling treatments and many new tenant store fronts. The mall is located on a 100-acre site, with approximately 125 in-line stores and three anchors: J.C. Penney, Macy's and Strawbridge's. The Company has a 50% interest in the partnership which owns the mall. The Court at Oxford Valley. The Court at Oxford Valley is a 692,000 square foot power center located in Langhorne, Pennsylvania, directly opposite the 1.5 million square foot Oxford Valley Mall. The Court, which opened in 1996, is located on a 95-acre site, with the following principal tenants: Dick's Clothing & Sporting Goods, Best Buy, Phar-Mor, HomePlace, BJ Wholesale Club and The Home Depot. BJ Wholesale Club and The Home Depot each own their stores. The Company has a 50% interest in the partnership which owns the shopping center. North Dartmouth Mall. North Dartmouth Mall is a 620,000 square foot, one-level, regional mall located in North Dartmouth, Massachusetts, approximately three miles west of New Bedford and eight miles east of Fall River, Massachusetts, directly accessible from Interstate 195. The mall, which opened in 1971 and was renovated in 1987, contains 50 in-line stores anchored by Sears, J.C. Penney, Ames and General Cinema Theatres. The Company owns 100% of, and manages, the mall. Whitehall Mall. Whitehall Mall is a 603,000 square foot, one-level, enclosed regional mall located in Allentown, Pennsylvania, directly across from Lehigh Valley Mall. The mall was completed in 1964 and renovated in 1982. This mall is located on a 51-acre site, with 61 in-line stores anchored by Sears and Kohl's. The Company has a 50% interest in the mall as a tenant in common. The Company expects to commence redevelopment of Whitehall Mall in January 1998. When redeveloped, the mall will include the existing Sears and Kohl's stores as well as a number of additional value-oriented retailers in a revised configuration. Magnolia Mall. Magnolia Mall is a 570,000 square foot, one-level, regional mall located in Florence, South Carolina at the Highway 20 interchange of Interstate 95, approximately midway between Myrtle Beach and Columbia, South Carolina. The mall serves a geographically large primary trade area, with the closest regional shopping center located approximately 70 miles from the center. The mall was opened in 1979 and was renovated in 1992. The mall is located on an 88-acre site, with 66 in-line stores and four anchors: Sears, Belk, J.C. Penney and Rose's. The Company owns (subject to a ground lease) 100% of, and manages, the mall. Fee title may be purchased for $5.7 million in 2004. Laurel Mall. Laurel Mall is a 558,000 square foot, one-level, enclosed mall located in Hazleton, Pennsylvania at the intersection of Interstate 81, Pennsylvania Route 309 and Airport Road. The mall opened in 1973, and was expanded in 1995 with the addition of J.C. Penney and 52,000 square feet of additional in-line space. The mall is located on a 55-acre site, with 72 in-line stores and three anchors: Boscov's Department Store, J.C. Penney and Kmart Corp. The Company has a 40% interest in the partnership which owns the center. Palmer Park Mall. Palmer Park Mall is a 349,000 square foot, enclosed mall located in Easton, Pennsylvania, one mile north of U.S. Route 22 on Pennsylvania Route 248. The center, which opened in 1972 and was expanded and redeveloped in 1982, is located on a 50-acre site, with 59 in-line stores (including an Eckerd Drug Store) anchored by The Bon-Ton. Negotiations with a second anchor to replace a former Clover store are underway. Substantial redevelopment planning is proceeding with the purchase by the partnership owning the mall of the Clover building and the renovation of the Clover building. The Company has a 50% interest in the partnership which owns the mall. Forestville Shopping Center. Forestville Shopping Center is a 218,000 square foot community center located in Forestville (suburban Washington, DC), Maryland on Old Marlboro Pike and Forestville Road (Interstate 495 and Route 4). The center, which opened in 1974 and was renovated in 1983, is located on an 18-acre site, with 20 in-line stores anchored by Ames. S-35
424B539th Page of 167TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 39th
Mandarin Corners Shopping Center. Mandarin Corners Shopping Center is a 216,000 square foot community center located on San Jose Boulevard and Interstate 295, ten miles southwest of downtown Jacksonville, Florida. The center, which opened in 1986, is located on a 23-acre site, with 25 in-line stores anchored by Wal-Mart, which expanded in 1993, Upton's and Carmike Cinemas. Springfield Park. Springfield Park is located in Springfield, Pennsylvania at the intersection of Route 1 (Baltimore Pike) and Route 420, approximately one-half mile north of the Springfield Mall and about one mile north from the interchange of Route 1 and Interstate 476. Target, the Company and the Company's co-tenant acquired condominium interests in the former Strawbridge & Clothier store, now vacant. Target plans to occupy the lower levels, which will be expanded to approximately 147,000 square feet. The Company owns a 50% interest in the third level (approximately 65,000 square feet) and a 4,000 square foot outparcel. All levels of the building have access to at-grade parking. The Company anticipates the releasing of the third level in the second half of 1998. Rio Mall. Rio Mall is a 161,000 square foot community center located in Rio Grande, New Jersey on a 16-acre site at the intersection of Route 9 and Route 47. The center, which opened in 1973, was renovated in 1992 with the expansion of Kmart. The center contains 16 in-line stores anchored by Kmart and Staples The Office Superstore. The Company has a 50% interest in the partnership which owns the center. Crest Plaza Shopping Center. Crest Plaza Shopping Center is a 153,000 square foot neighborhood center located in South Whitehall Township, Pennsylvania on a 33-acre site at the intersection of Cedar Crest Boulevard and Walbert Avenue. The center, which opened in 1959, was renovated and expanded in 1991. The center contains 21 in-line stores anchored by Weis Market. Park Plaza Shopping Center. Park Plaza Shopping Center is a 151,000 square foot neighborhood center located on 49th Street and Park Boulevard, Pinellas Park, Florida. The center opened in 1963 and was renovated in 1983, led by the expansion and remodeling of Publix Supermarket. The center is located on a 15-acre site, with 24 in-line stores anchored by Publix Supermarket, Eckerd Drug Store and Ace Hardware. The Company has a 50% interest in the center as a tenant in common. South Blanding Village Shopping Center. South Blanding Village Shopping Center is a 107,000 square foot neighborhood center located in Orange Park (suburban Jacksonville), Florida. The center, which opened in 1986, is located on a 17.5-acre site, with 13 in-line stores anchored by Food Lion and Scotty's. Ormond Beach Mall. Ormond Beach Mall is a 103,000 square foot neighborhood center located in Daytona Beach, Florida. The center, which opened in 1966, was expanded and remodeled in 1991. Ormond Beach Mall is located on an 11-acre site, with 18 in-line stores anchored by Publix Supermarket, Belk-Lindsay and Eckerd Drug. The Company has a 25% interest in the center as a tenant in common. Ingleside Shopping Center. Ingleside Shopping Center is a 102,000 square foot neighborhood center located in Thorndale, PA on a 10-acre site at the intersection of Lincoln Highway (Business U.S. Route 30) and Bailey Road, Chester County. The center, which opened in 1981, was redeveloped in 1995 with Kmart occupying the entire property. The Company owns 100% of a portion of the center and has a 50% interest in the partnership which owns the remaining portion of the center. Punta Gorda Mall. Punta Gorda Mall is a 102,000 square foot neighborhood center located in Punta Gorda, Florida on U.S. Route 41 and Tamiami Trail. The center, which opened in 1965, was remodeled in 1992. The center is located on a 77-acre site, and includes 21 in-line stores anchored by Publix Supermarket, Beall's and Eckerd Drug Store. The Company has a 25% interest in the center as a tenant in common. S-36
424B540th Page of 167TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 40th
The following table sets forth scheduled lease expirations and certain other information, as of August 31, 1997, for leases in place for the Existing Retail Properties assuming that none of the tenants exercises renewal options or termination rights: · Enlarge/Download Table Base Rent Percent of Total Leased Annualized Approximate Per Square Square Feet Number of Base Rent Square Feet Foot of Represented By Expiring of Expiring of Expiring Expiring Expiring Year Ending December 31, Leases Leases Leases Leases Leases ------------------------------- ----------- ------------- ------------- ------------ ------------------------ 1998 ........................ 85 $ 2,726,056 303,954 $8.97 6.9% 1999 ........................ 50 1,929,919 327,654 5.89 7.4 2000 ........................ 56 1,752,427 158,080 11.00 3.6 2001 ........................ 72 3,531,402 432,572 8.16 9.8 2002 ........................ 46 1,929,045 178,057 10.83 4.0 2003 ........................ 37 2,662,176 231,062 11.52 5.2 2004 ........................ 28 2,830,863 224,083 12.63 5.1 2005 ........................ 32 2,049,362 124,892 16.41 2.8 2006 ........................ 48 4,717,681 554,385 8.51 12.6 2007 ........................ 26 3,587,946 496,852 7.22 11.3 -- ----------- --------- ----- ---- Total/weighted average ...... 480 $27,716,877 3,031,591 $9.14 68.8% === =========== ========= ----- ==== The Acquisition Properties The Company has entered into agreements to acquire a 100% interest in Northeast Tower Center and a 50% interest in Hillview Shopping Center. Hillview Shopping Center and Northeast Tower Center are power centers being acquired from TRO Affiliates as part of the TRO Transaction. The Company's actual aggregate purchase price (in the form of assumed debt and equity) for each property will be based on the following formula: (i) leased space will be valued at a 10.0% capitalization rate on net cash flow (as defined in the agreements); and (ii) unleased space will be valued based on an appraisal process. The equity portion of the purchase price will be payable, in each case, in OP Units valued at $23.40 per unit, which was the average closing price of the Shares over the 20 trading days prior to July 30, 1997, the date that the definitive documentation for the TRO Transaction was executed. Accordingly, the actual equity portion of the purchase price will be a function of additional lease-up activity and other factors prior to the Company's purchase of the Acquisition Properties. S-37
424B541st Page of 167TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 41st
The following table sets forth certain information, as of November 28, 1997, regarding the Acquisition Properties: · Enlarge/Download Table Percentage Expected Total To Be Acquisition Square Property Name Location Acquired Date Feet -------------------------- ------------------ -------------- ------------- --------- Hillview Shopping Center Cherry Hill, NJ 50% 1998 340,000 Northeast Tower Center Philadelphia, PA 100%(3) 1999 484,000 ------- Total 824,000 ======= Owned Estimated Square Principal Acquisition Construction Property Name Feet Tenants Cost Status -------------------------- ---------------- ------------------------ -------------------- -------------------------- Hillview Shopping Center 340,000(1) Target, Kohl's, $ 14,700,000(2) All tenants open except PETsMART, HomePlace, PETsMART Babies 'R Us, Crown Books Northeast Tower Center 353,000(4) The Home Depot, 25,700,000(5) Phase I: 363,000 square PETsMART, Staples The feet completed. Phase II: Office Superstore, Old Expected completion is Navy, The Pep Boys -- Fall 1998 Manny, Moe & Jack ------- ------------- Total 693,000 $ 40,400,000 ======= ============= ______________ (1) Includes 261,000 square feet of retail space situated on land leased to tenants which own their own buildings. (2) Includes allocated portion of expected assumed indebtedness of $12.9 million at Company's proportionate share. (3) The Company will initially acquire an 89% interest in the partnerships which own this property and the right to acquire the remaining 11% interest not earlier than three years from the initial acquisition date. (4) Includes 153,000 square feet of retail space situated on land leased to tenants which own their own buildings. (5) Includes expected assumed indebtedness of $20.5 million. S-38
424B542nd Page of 167TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 42nd
Set forth below are descriptions of the Acquisition Properties. Hillview Shopping Center. Hillview Shopping Center is a 340,000 square foot power center which opened in October 1997 and is located on Route 38 in Cherry Hill, New Jersey, directly opposite the 1.3 million square foot Cherry Hill Mall. Approximately 261,000 square feet of space represents stores owned by tenants located on land leased by the Company to such tenants. Tenants in the center include Target, Kohl's, Babies 'R Us, HomePlace, PETsMART, Crown Books and Silver Diner. The Company expects to acquire a 50% interest in the center held by the TRO Affiliates in early 1998. Northeast Tower Center. Northeast Tower Center is a 484,000 square foot power center located on Roosevelt Boulevard (Route 1) in the northeast section of Philadelphia. The first phase of the center, totaling 363,000 square feet, was completed in 1997. The center is being developed by PREIT-RUBIN and all of the equity interests in the center are owned by TRO Affiliates. The tenants in the center include The Home Depot, PETsMART, The Pep Boys - Manny, Moe & Jack, Staples The Office Superstore and Old Navy. When fully completed, the center is expected to contain approximately ten other stores. Shortly after completion of the center, which is currently anticipated to occur during fall 1998, the Company intends to initially acquire 89% of the interests of the partnerships which own the property. The Company will have the absolute right to acquire the remaining 11% no less than 36 months following the initial acquisition date. The Development Properties The Company or a joint venture partner has rights in five Development Properties, four of which (Red Rose Commons, Blue Route Metroplex, and Christiana Power Center Phases I and II) were acquired in connection with the TRO Transaction. As each of the four Development Properties is completed and leased up, it will be valued based on the following principles: (i) all space leased and occupied by "credit tenants" will be valued at ten times adjusted cash flow (computed as specified in the applicable contribution agreement between the Company and TRO); (ii) all space leased to a credit tenant but unoccupied will be valued at ten times adjusted cash flow calculated as though the space were built and occupied as set forth in the budget for such property; and (iii) space not leased or occupied, whether built or unbuilt, will be valued as mutually agreed upon or, failing agreement, by an appraisal process. The Company will be obligated to issue Class A OP Units equal to 50% of the amount, if any, by which the value of the Company's interest in each project exceeded the aggregate cost of such project at the time of completion, with provisions for netting negative amounts arising in connection with completion or abandonment of any project against earlier completed projects. There can be no assurance that construction will be commenced on any Development Property for which construction has not commenced as of the date hereof or that any Development Property for which construction has commenced will be completed as planned. See "Risk Factors -- Possible Environmental Liabilities" and "-- Risks of Development" in the accompanying Prospectus. S-39
424B543rd Page of 167TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 43rd
The following table sets forth certain information, as of November 10, 1997, regarding the Development Properties: · Enlarge/Download Table Planned Planned Percentage Total Owned To Be Square Square Property Name Location Owned Feet Feet ------------------------------------- ---------------------- ------------ ----------- ----------- Christiana Power Center Phase I Newark, DE 50% 295,000 142,000 Red Rose Commons(2) Lancaster, PA 50% 463,000 265,000 Warrington Shopping Center(3) Warrington, PA 100% 415,000 140,000 Blue Route Metroplex(2)(3) Plymouth Meeting, PA 50% 760,000 319,000 Christiana Power Center Phase II(4) Newark, DE 50% 300,000 150,000 --------- --------- Total 2,233,000 1,016,000 ========= ========= Total Estimated Square Estimated Development Feet Development Cost - Expected Property Name Leased Cost Company Share Status(1) Completion ------------------------------------- --------- -------------- --------------- -------------- --------------- Christiana Power Center Phase I 169,000 $ 37,800,000 $18,900,000 Construction Second half of 1998 Red Rose Commons(2) 352,000 29,000,000 14,500,000 Construction Second half of 1998 Warrington Shopping Center(3) -- 13,900,000 13,900,000 Development Second half of 1999 Blue Route Metroplex(2)(3) -- 48,400,000 24,200,000 Development First half of 2000 Christiana Power Center Phase II(4) -- -- -- Development Second half of 2000 ------- ------------ ----------- Total 521,000 $129,100,000 $71,500,000 ======= ============ =========== -------- (1) "Construction" indicates that construction activities, such as site preparation, ground-breaking activities, or exterior construction, have commenced. "Development" indicates that development activities, such as site surveys, preparation of architectural plans, or initiation of land use approvals or rezoning processes, have commenced (but "Construction" has not commenced). (2) Subject to reduction to 25% under the terms of the Goldenberg Letter Agreement (see "The Company -- The TRO Transaction -- The Goldenberg Letter Agreement"). (3) Construction of this project is subject to obtaining site plan approval. (4) This project is not currently zoned for retail use, and participation by the Company in the development is subject to rezoning. S-40
424B544th Page of 167TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 44th
Set forth below are descriptions of the five Development Properties: Christiana Power Center -- Phases I and II. Christiana Power Center is located adjacent to the Christiana Mall in Newark, Delaware at the Delaware Route 1 interchange of Interstate 95. Phase I of the center is expected to contain approximately 295,000 square feet, of which 137,000 square feet has been ground leased to Costco, 32,000 square feet is subject to a binding lease and the remaining 126,000 square feet is currently subject to discussions with various tenants. Construction of Phase I commenced in November 1997 and is expected to be completed in the second half of 1998. Phase II of the Christiana Power Center is planned for 300,000 square feet. The construction of Phase II is subject to rezoning for retail use, and Phase II is not expected to open until the second half of 2000. Red Rose Commons. Red Rose Commons is a power center located in Lancaster, Pennsylvania. This project is being developed in a joint venture with The Goldenberg Group in which the Company will have a 50% interest. The center is expected to contain 463,000 square feet and be anchored by The Home Depot, Weis Market, HomePlace, The Sports Authority, Office Max, PETsMART, Barnes & Noble Book Store and The Pep Boys - Manny, Moe & Jack. Construction commenced in November 1997, and the center is expected to open in the second half of 1998. Warrington Shopping Center. Warrington Shopping Center is a proposed power center expected to contain approximately 415,000 square feet located at the intersection of Route 611 and Street Road in Warrington, Pennsylvania. Development activity on this project is in the preliminary stages and a number of land use approvals and leasing commitments must be obtained prior to the commencement of construction in 1998. Blue Route Metroplex. Blue Route Metroplex is located in Plymouth Meeting, Pennsylvania. This proposed power center is expected to contain approximately 760,000 square feet with an additional parcel for office or hotel development. The opening date for the Blue Route Metroplex is expected to occur during the first half of 2000. The site has been properly zoned for the intended uses and final site plan approval is pending. This project is being developed in a joint venture with The Goldenberg Group, in which the Company will have a 50% interest. The Company's interest in the property will be limited to the retail portion of the project. The Multifamily Properties The Company has interests in 19 Multifamily Properties with an aggregate of 7,236 units. The Company manages ten of its Multifamily Properties, and the nine remaining Multifamily Properties held are managed by the Company's partners. S-41
424B545th Page of 167TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 45th
The following table sets forth certain information regarding the 19 Multifamily Properties as of (or for the period ended) August 31, 1997: · Enlarge/Download Table Year Number Percentage Built/ Of Total Percentage Property Name Location Owned Renovated(1) Units Square Feet Occupied ------------------------- ----------------------- ------------ -------------- -------- ------------- ------------ Emerald Point Virginia Beach, VA 65% 1965/1993 862 846,000 96% Boca Palms Boca Raton, FL 100% 1970,1991 522 673,000 97 /1994 Lakewood Hills Harrisburg, PA 100% 1972, 1975, 562 630,000 96 1982/1988 Regency Lakeside Omaha, NE 50% 1970/1990 433 492,000 99 Kenwood Gardens Toledo, OH 100% 1951/1989 504 404,000 98 Fox Run, Delaware Bear, DE 50% 1988 414 359,000 96 Eagle's Nest Coral Springs, FL 50% 1989 264 343,000 97 Palms of Pembroke Pembroke Pines, FL 100% 1989/1995 348 340,000 95 Hidden Lakes Dayton, OH 100% 1987/1994 360 306,000 98 Cobblestone Pompano Beach, FL 100% 1986/1994 384 297,000 95 Countrywood Tampa, FL 50% 1977/1997 536 295,000 95 Shenandoah Village West Palm Beach, FL 100% 1985/1993 220 286,000 97 Marylander Baltimore, MD 100% 1951/1989 510 279,000 98 Camp Hill Plaza Camp Hill, PA 100% 1967/1994 300 277,000 97 Charter Pointe Altamonte Springs, FL 40% 1974/1993 312 258,000 96 Fox Run Warminster, PA 50% 1969/1992 196 232,000 99 Cambridge Hall West Chester, PA 50% 1967/1993 232 186,000 99 Will-O-Hill Reading, PA 50% 1970/1986 190 152,000 99 2031 Locust Street Philadelphia, PA 100% 1929/1986 87 89,000 98 ----- --------- Total/Weighted Average 7,236 6,744,000 97% ===== ========= Monthly Monthly Property Average Quoted Quoted Revenue - Rent Rent Rent Property Company Property Property Name per Unit per Unit per Square Foot Revenue Share EBITDA ------------------------- ---------- ---------- ----------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- Emerald Point $ 463 $ 515 $ 0.52 $ 4,943,000 $ 3,213,000 $ 2,829,000 Boca Palms 802 917 0.71 5,159,000 5,159,000 2,820,000 Lakewood Hills 590 663 0.59 4,036,000 4,036,000 2,409,000 Regency Lakeside 886 933 0.82 4,690,000 2,345,000 2,896,000 Kenwood Gardens 362 422 0.53 2,294,000 2,294,000 1,002,000 Fox Run, Delaware 588 609 0.70 3,224,000 1,612,000 1,858,000 Eagle's Nest 812 898 0.69 2,650,000 1,325,000 1,302,000 Palms of Pembroke 788 901 0.92 3,598,000 3,598,000 2,142,000 Hidden Lakes 523 622 0.73 2,400,000 2,400,000 1,407,000 Cobblestone 644 724 0.94 3,106,000 3,106,000 1,791,000 Countrywood 409 443 0.80 2,796,000 1,398,000 1,242,000 Shenandoah Village 820 923 0.71 2,279,000 2,279,000 1,246,000 Marylander 461 510 0.93 2,990,000 2,990,000 1,698,000 Camp Hill Plaza 598 675 0.73 2,214,000 2,214,000 1,359,000 Charter Pointe 470 518 0.63 1,840,000 736,000 831,000 Fox Run 637 671 0.57 1,512,000 756,000 766,000 Cambridge Hall 607 628 0.78 1,748,000 874,000 894,000 Will-O-Hill 487 522 0.65 1,142,000 571,000 592,000 2031 Locust Street 1,172 1,302 1.27 1,290,000 1,290,000 627,000 ------ ------ ------ ----------- ----------- ----------- Total/Weighted Average $ 595 $ 659 $ 0.71 $53,911,000 $42,196,000 $29,711,000 ------ ------ ------ =========== =========== ===========
424B546th Page of 167TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 46th
· Download Table Property EBITDA - Company Property Name Share ------------------------- ------------------- Emerald Point $ 2,229,000(2) Boca Palms 2,820,000 Lakewood Hills 2,409,000 Regency Lakeside 2,016,000(2) Kenwood Gardens 1,002,000 Fox Run, Delaware 929,000 Eagle's Nest 651,000 Palms of Pembroke 2,142,000 Hidden Lakes 1,407,000 Cobblestone 1,791,000 Countrywood 881,000(2) Shenandoah Village 1,246,000 Marylander 1,698,000 Camp Hill Plaza 1,359,000 Charter Pointe 558,000(2) Fox Run 383,000 Cambridge Hall 447,000 Will-O-Hill 296,000 2031 Locust Street 627,000 -------------- Total/Weighted Average $ 24,891,000 ============== -------- (1) Year initially completed and most recently renovated, and where applicable, year(s) in which additional phases were completed at the property. (2) The Company's share of EBITDA from this property for the year ended August 31, 1997 is greater than its stated percentage interest because of certain preferred return provisions in the respective partnership agreements. S-42
424B547th Page of 167TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 47th
Other Properties Shortly following the initial organization of the Company, it acquired six industrial properties. The Company has not acquired any property of this type in over 20 years and the Company does not consider these properties to be part of its core portfolio. In the aggregate, these properties contributed less than 3% of the Company's net rental income for the fiscal year ended August 31, 1997, and the Company is currently evaluating the potential disposition of these assets. The following table sets forth certain information, as of August 31, 1997, regarding the six industrial properties: Industrial Properties · Download Table Year Percentage Square Percentage Property and Location Acquired Owned Feet Leased -------------------------- ---------- ------------ --------- ----------- Office and Warehouse Annandale, VA ............ 1962 100% 332,000 100% Warehouse Pennsauken, NJ ......... 1962 100% 12,000 100% Warehouse Allentown, PA ............ 1962 100% 16,000 100% Warehouse Pennsauken, NJ ......... 1963 100% 30,000 100% Warehouse and Plant Lowell, MA ............... 1963 100% 197,000 100% Warehouse and Plant Ft. Washington, PA ...... 1962 50% 141,000 100% ------- Total .................. 728,000 ======= The Company also holds partial interests in three parcels of undeveloped land. Over the next 12 months, the Company anticipates determining, with its respective joint venture partners, whether any of these parcels present appropriate development opportunities for the Company; in the event that they do not, the Company intends to consider the potential disposition of these assets. The following table sets forth certain information, as of August 31, 1997, regarding the three land parcels: Land Parcels Year Percentage Location Acquired Owned Acres ------------------------- ---------- ----------- ------ Rancocas, NJ ............ 1971 75% 54 Elizabethtown, PA ...... 1972 50% 22 Coral Springs, FL ...... 1990 50% 14 -- Total ............... 90 == S-43
424B548th Page of 167TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 48th
MANAGEMENT Trustees and Officers The Company's Board of Trustees consists of nine members, five of whom are not employed by or otherwise affiliated with the Company. The following table sets forth certain information with respect to the Trustees, senior officers, and other significant employees of the Company: · Enlarge/Download Table Name Age Position ---------------------------- ----- ----------------------------------------------------- Trustees: Sylvan M. Cohen ............ 83 Chairman of the Board of Trustees Ronald Rubin* ............ 66 Chief Executive Officer and Trustee Jonathan B. Weller ......... 51 President, Chief Operating Officer and Trustee George F. Rubin* ......... 54 President of PREIT-RUBIN and Trustee William R. Dimeling ...... 56 Trustee Rosemarie B. Greco* ...... 51 Trustee Lee H. Javitch ............ 65 Trustee Leonard I. Korman ......... 61 Trustee Jeffrey P. Orleans ......... 51 Trustee Senior Officers: Edward A. Glickman ......... 40 Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer Jeffrey A. Linn ............ 48 Senior Vice President-Acquisitions and Secretary Dante J. Massimini ......... 64 Senior Vice President-Finance and Treasurer Raymond J. Trost ......... 42 Vice President-Multifamily Asset Management Leonard B. Shore ......... 66 Executive Vice President-Development of PREIT- RUBIN Joseph F. Coradino ......... 46 Executive Vice President of PREIT-RUBIN Alan F. Feldman ............ 34 Chief Operating Officer-Retail Division of PREIT- RUBIN Pat A. Berns ............... 43 Executive Vice President-Retail Leasing of PREIT- RUBIN Other Significant Employees: Elaine Berger ............ 43 Vice President-Specialty Leasing William B. Berlin ......... 58 Vice President-Retail Management Richard E. Brown ......... 45 Vice President-Asset Management Timothy J. Bruce ......... 40 Vice President-Retail Leasing David J. Bryant ............ 39 Vice President-Financial Services Harvey Diamond ............ 50 Vice President-Retail Leasing Douglas S. Grayson ......... 39 Vice President-Development Eric M. Mallory ............ 37 Vice President-Acquisitions James L. Paterno ......... 34 Vice President-Office Leasing Denny D. Moore ............ 41 Vice President-Retail Leasing ------------ * Elected pursuant to the terms of the TRO Contribution Agreement. S-44
424B549th Page of 167TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 49th
Sylvan M. Cohen is Chairman of the Board of Trustees. Mr. Cohen was a founder of the Company in 1960 and served as its Chief Executive Officer for 37 years. He is of counsel to the law firm of Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP and formerly a partner in the Philadelphia law firm of Cohen, Shapiro, Polisher, Shiekman and Cohen. Mr. Cohen is a former chairman of the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts and of the International Council of Shopping Centers ("ICSC"). He remains a member of the board of the ICSC. Mr. Cohen has served on numerous civic and charitable boards and is a member of the Advisory Board of the Real Estate Center at the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania. Mr. Cohen is a director of FPA Corporation, a trustee of EQK Realty Investments I, and a trustee of Arbor Property Trust. He is a graduate of the University of Pennsylvania and the University of Pennsylvania Law School. Ronald Rubin is Chief Executive Officer and Trustee. Mr. Rubin joined Richard I. Rubin and Co., Inc. in 1953 and served it in a number of capacities. He served as chairman and chief executive officer of The Rubin Organization, Inc. for over 25 years. Mr. Rubin is a past president of the Greater Philadelphia Chamber of Commerce and was instrumental in the organization of the Center City District, which is funded by local businesses to assure a cleaner, safer downtown in Philadelphia. Mr. Rubin has served on numerous boards and in various leadership positions in the Philadelphia community. He is a director of PECO Energy Corp. He is the brother of George F. Rubin. Jonathan B. Weller is President and Chief Operating Officer and Trustee. Mr. Weller joined the Company in 1993. From 1970 to 1993, Mr. Weller served in various capacities for Eastdil Realty, a real estate investment banking firm, where he most recently served as executive vice president and a member of the board of directors. Mr. Weller is a graduate of Williams College and the Columbia University Business School. George F. Rubin is President of PREIT-RUBIN and Trustee. Mr. Rubin joined The Rubin Organization, Inc. in 1970 and has served in various capacities since that time. Mr. Rubin is active in various retail organizations. He serves on the boards of various civic and educational and charitable organizations, including Lafayette College, Elwyn Institute and Thorncroft Therapeutic Horseback Riding, Inc., where he is chairman. He is a graduate of Lafayette College. He is the brother of Ronald Rubin. William R. Dimeling, Trustee, has been a partner in Dimeling, Schreiber and Park, an investment partnership since 1982. He is a general partner at Dimeling, Schreiber and Park Reorganization Fund, L.P., Funds I and II, and serves on the boards of a number of portfolio companies of those funds. He is also a director of Addison Capital Shares and Aero Services International, Inc. He is a graduate of Yale College and the University of Pennsylvania Law School. Rosemarie B. Greco, Trustee, is a businesswoman. She served as president and chief executive officer of CoreStates Bank, N.A. and as president of CoreStates Financial Corp. from August 1994 to August 1997. From 1991 to 1994, Ms. Greco served as chief retail banking officer of CoreStates and president of CoreStates First Pennsylvania Bank. Prior to 1991, Ms. Greco served as president of Fidelity Bank. Ms. Greco is a director of General Accident Insurance Company of America, and also serves on the boards of various civic and professional organizations. She is a graduate of St. Joseph's University. Lee H. Javitch, Trustee, is a private investor. He served as chairman and chief executive officer of Giant Food Stores, Inc. from 1979 to 1983. Prior to that time, he served in various senior management positions with Giant Foods. He is a director of First Maryland BanCorp and Dauphin Deposit Corp. He serves on the board of the Jewish Theological Seminary of America. He is a graduate of Syracuse University. Leonard I. Korman, Trustee, has been president and chief executive officer of Korman Commercial Properties, Inc., a commercial real estate management and development firm, since 1996. He was a general partner of The Korman Co., a real estate management and development firm. He is a director of CoreStates Bank, N.A. and a trustee of the Pennsylvania Academy of Fine Arts and Albert Einstein Medical Center. Mr. Korman is a graduate of the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania. Jeffrey P. Orleans, Trustee, has served as chairman and chief executive officer of FPA Corporation, a publicly held residential real estate developer, since 1993. Prior to that time, he was president of Orleans Construction Company. He is a director of New Jersey National Bank, the National Association of Home Builders and a trustee of Albert Einstein Medical Center as well as other civic, educational and professional organizations. Mr. Orleans is a graduate of Drexel University. S-45
424B550th Page of 167TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 50th
Edward A. Glickman is Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. He joined The Rubin Organization, Inc. in 1993. From 1989 to 1993, Mr. Glickman was employed by Presidential Realty Corporation, a publicly traded REIT, where he served as chief financial officer. Prior to that time, Mr. Glickman was employed by Shearson Lehman Brothers and Smith Barney. Mr. Glickman is a graduate of the University of Pennsylvania and the Harvard Business School. Jeffrey A. Linn is Senior Vice President for Acquisitions and Secretary. Mr. Linn joined the Company in 1974 and has served in various capacities, including Vice President for Operations and Development. He is a board member of the National Housing Counsel and a member of ICSC. Mr. Linn is a graduate of Brandeis University. Dante J. Massimini is Senior Vice President and Treasurer. Mr. Massimini joined the Company in 1971 and has held a number of positions since that time. Mr. Massimini is a graduate of LaSalle College. Raymond J. Trost is Vice President for Multifamily Asset Management. Mr. Trost joined the Company in 1983 and has held a number of positions since that time. Mr. Trost holds a real estate broker's license and is a licensed real estate appraiser. He holds various professional designations in the multifamily management industry. Leonard B. Shore is Executive Vice President-Development of PREIT-RUBIN. Mr. Shore joined The Rubin Organization, Inc. in 1968 and has held a variety of positions in commercial real estate development, with 45 years of experience in the commercial real estate industry. Mr. Shore directed development for Willow Grove Park Mall, Willow Grove, Pennsylvania; Cumberland Mall, Vineland, New Jersey; Newburgh Mall, Newburgh, New York; and Christiana Mall, Newark, Delaware. In 1987-88, Mr. Shore directed the renovation of Philadelphia's historic Bellevue Stratford hotel into a mixed use facility. Mr. Shore is a graduate of Temple University. Joseph F. Coradino is Executive Vice President of PREIT-RUBIN. Mr. Coradino joined The Rubin Organization, Inc. in 1981. Prior to that time, he was a leasing representative for Jackson Cross Company where he directed commercial brokerage activities for Southern New Jersey. Mr. Coradino began his real estate career with Kravitz Properties Inc., where he was a leasing specialist for enclosed mall shopping center space. Mr. Coradino has 20 years of experience in the commercial real estate industry, and is active in many professional, civic and charitable organizations. Mr. Coradino is a graduate of Temple University and the Schools of City Planning and Finance of the University of Arizona. Alan F. Feldman is Chief Operating Officer-Retail Division, of PREIT-RUBIN. Mr. Feldman joined The Rubin Organization, Inc. in 1992. Prior to that time, Mr. Feldman was director of the community shopping center division of Strouse Greenberg & Co., Inc. Mr. Feldman has eight years of experience in the shopping center industry, and is a member of the ICSC. Mr. Feldman is a graduate of Tufts University and the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania. Pat A. Berns is Executive Vice President-Retail Leasing of PREIT-RUBIN. She joined The Rubin Organization, Inc. in 1983. Prior to joining The Rubin Organization, Inc., she was employed by First Union Real Estate, Cleveland, Ohio, as a leasing representative, and by R&B Enterprises as a space planner for commercial, retail and industrial properties. She is a member of the ICSC. Ms. Berns is a graduate of City College, New York. S-46
424B551st Page of 167TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 51st
Executive Compensation The following table sets forth certain information concerning the compensation paid by the Company during the fiscal years ended August 31, 1997, 1996 and 1995 to the Company's Chief Executive Officer and the four other most highly compensated executive officers of the Company. · Enlarge/Download Table Long Term Compensation Annual Compensation Awards ---------------------------------------- -------------- All Other Name and Principal Other Annual Compensation Position Year Salary Bonus Compensation(1) Options (2) -------------------------------- ------ ---------- --------- ----------------- -------------- ------------- Sylvan M. Cohen(3) 1997 $345,000 $ 0 $ 0 0 $ 9,070 Chairman and Chief 1996 342,333 0 0 0 9,070 Executive Officer and Trustee 1995 333,000 0 0 20,000 9,070 Jonathan B. Weller 1997 301,731 50,000 22,414 20,000 26,611 President and Chief 1996 297,212 0 7,182 20,000 25,608 Operating Officer and Trustee 1995 281,539 0 37,463 35,000 32,408 Robert G. Rogers(4) 1997 193,365 0 33,414 0 0 Executive Vice 1996 191,923 0 7,182 5,000 69,654 President and Trustee 1995 183,269 0 0 10,000 72,499 Jeffrey A. Linn 1997 134,375 20,000 33,835 10,000 14,042 Senior Vice President- 1996 130,797 0 5,163 10,000 14,114 Acquisitions and 1995 116,346 0 0 15,000 16,985 Secretary Dante J. Massimini 1997 128,365 5,000 39,204 5,000 60,661 Senior Vice President- 1996 125,673 0 5,174 5,000 59,897 Finance and 1995 116,538 0 0 10,000 54,706 Treasurer ------------ (1) Amounts shown in fiscal 1997 represent: (i) discretionary contributions by the Company to the accounts of Messrs. Weller, Rogers, Linn and Massimini in the Company's 401(k) retirement plan in the amounts of $7,164, $7,164, $6,010 and $5,704, respectively; and (ii) paid accrued vacation salary of $15,250, $26,250, $27,825 and $33,500, respectively. Amounts shown in fiscal 1996 represent discretionary contributions by the Company to the accounts of the named executive officers in the Company's 401(k) retirement plan. Amounts shown for fiscal 1995 for Mr. Weller include $14,352 for relocation expenses, $12,378 for reimbursement for taxes resulting from payment of living expenses on behalf of Mr. Weller in 1994 and $10,733 in respect of a leased automobile. (2) All amounts for Mr. Cohen represent annual premium payments on life insurance provided under Mr. Cohen's employment agreement. Amounts for Mr. Weller include $9,750 of annual premium payments on life insurance provided under Mr. Weller's employment agreement. All other amounts represent contributions by the Company with respect to fiscal 1997, fiscal 1996 and fiscal 1995 under the non-qualified retirement plan approved during fiscal 1995 in which Messrs. Weller, Rogers, Massimini and Linn are participants. (3) Effective September 30, 1997, Mr. Cohen is no longer Chief Executive Officer. (4) Mr. Rogers resigned as a Trustee of the Company effective September 30, 1997 and as an officer of the Company effective December 31, 1997. Committees of the Board The Company has a standing Audit Committee, Executive Compensation and Human Resources Committee and Property Committee. The Audit Committee is currently comprised of Ms. Rosemarie B. Greco (Chair), Mr. Lee H. Javitch and Mr. Jeffrey P. Orleans. The principal duties of the Audit Committee are to recommend independent public accountants for appointment by the Company; to review with the independent accountants the planned scope and results of the annual audit and their reports and recommendations; and to review with the independent accountants matters relating to the Company's system of internal controls. The Executive Compensation and Human Resources Committee is currently comprised of Messrs. Leonard I. Korman (Chair), William R. Dimeling and Lee H. Javitch. The principal duties of the Executive Compensation and Human Resources Committee are to recommend compensation arrangements for the executive officers of the Company and to administer the Company's stock option plans. S-47
424B552nd Page of 167TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 52nd
The Property Committee is currently comprised of Messrs. Sylvan M. Cohen (Chair), Leonard I. Korman, and Jeffrey P. Orleans. Messrs. Ronald Rubin and Jonathan B. Weller serve as ex officio members of the Property Committee. The principal duties of the Property Committee are to review acquisitions and dispositions of portfolio properties proposed by management and make recommendations thereon to the Board of Trustees. The Trustees have also constituted a committee consisting of Mr. Leonard I. Korman (Chair), Ms. Rosemarie B. Greco and Mr. William R. Dimeling for the purpose of addressing and resolving any matters which may arise in the implementation of the provisions of the TRO Transaction following the closing of the TRO Transaction. Stock Option Plans Set forth below are the stock option plans of the Company and the number of Shares authorized to be granted and outstanding under each: Shares Options Authorized To Options Currently Plan Be Granted Granted Exercisable -------------------------- --------------- --------- ------------ 1990 Incentive and Non-Qualified Stock Option Plan ...... 400,000 340,125 223,286 Jonathan B. Weller Non-Qualified Stock Option Plan ...... 100,000 100,000 75,000 1990 Option Plan for Non-Employee Trustees ............... 100,000 38,250 16,500 1997 Stock Option Plan .................. 560,000 455,000 0 The 1990 Incentive and Non-Qualified Stock Option Plan authorizes the grant of incentive of non-qualified stock options to key employees. The Jonathan B. Weller Non-Qualified Stock Option Plan was adopted by the Company pursuant to provisions of Mr. Weller's employment agreement and he is the only person eligible to receive options under such plan. The 1990 Option Plan for Non-Employee Trustees provides for the automatic grant of non-qualified stock options in respect of 1,000 Shares to each non-employee Trustee of the Company on the last trading day of January of each year at a price equal to the closing price of the Shares on that date. All options are granted with exercise prices equal to at least market value on the grant date, and it is the general policy of the Company that options vest in four equal annual installments commencing on the first anniversary of the grant date. All of the outstanding options expire ten years after their grant. The 1997 Stock Option Plan was adopted in connection with the TRO Transaction and options on 455,000 Shares were granted to former TRO officers and employees on September 30, 1997 at an exercise price of $25.41 per Share. All options granted on September 30, 1997 vest in four equal annual installments commencing January 1, 1999, and on each anniversary date thereof. It is anticipated that the remaining 105,000 options authorized under the 1997 Stock Option Plan will be granted over the next three months to approximately 40 employees. S-48
424B553rd Page of 167TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 53rd
Employment Agreements The Company and PREIT-RUBIN are parties to employment agreements with substantially all of their respective executive officers, including Messrs. Sylvan M. Cohen, Ronald Rubin, Jonathan B. Weller, George F. Rubin, Edward A. Glickman, Jeffrey A. Linn and Daniel J. Massimini. Mr. Cohen's employment agreement was originally entered into in 1985 and has been amended and extended several times since that date. The current expiration date of Mr. Cohen's employment agreement is December 31, 2000. Mr. Cohen's employment agreement provides for current annual base compensation of $345,000 and for post-termination benefits for the life of Mr. Cohen equal to 50% of the highest rate of Mr. Cohen's compensation while employed by the Company. Mr. Cohen's spouse is also entitled to payments under the contract if she survives him. Mr. Cohen did not participate in the Company's now terminated defined benefit plan and does not participate in the Company's defined contribution plan. The Company is party to an employment agreement with Ronald Rubin for an initial term of five years, extending year-to-year thereafter until terminated by either party. The agreement took effect on September 30, 1997. During the period of his employment, Mr. Rubin is required to devote his full working time, energy, skill and best efforts to the performance of his duties. Under the agreement, he may not participate in any other business pursuits, except he may maintain his existing ownership interest in approximately 28 commercial properties in which the Company will have no interest so long as the aggregate time he devotes to such properties is insignificant and such activities do not interfere with, detract from or affect the performance of his duties to the Company. The contract provides for annual base salary of $345,000, provided that at all times during the terms of the contract the base salary be at least equal to the highest amount paid to any other person employed by the Company. For each fiscal year commencing after December 31, 1997, Mr. Rubin will be entitled to incentive compensation under the Company's cash incentive bonus plan. The contract also provides for the grant pursuant to the 1997 Stock Option Plan of non-qualified options to purchase 150,000 Shares. Such options were granted to Mr. Rubin on September 30, 1997 at an exercise price of $25.41, which was the closing price of the Shares on September 30, 1997. The options vest in four equal annual installments beginning January 1, 1999. If Mr. Rubin's employment is terminated other than for cause or a change in control of the Company, he will be entitled to lump sum severance equal to the present value of his base salary and a target incentive bonus for the remaining portion of the contract term at the time of termination. If his employment is terminated pursuant to a change in control (including voluntary termination by Mr. Rubin within 60 days of a change in control), the Company must pay him up to three times the present value of his base salary and target incentive compensation, subject to all reductions necessary to preserve the deductibility of all such payments under the Code. During Mr. Rubin's employment and for one year thereafter if his employment is terminated for cause, Mr. Rubin is prohibited from competing with the Company as provided for therein. Any non-competition agreement would terminate upon a change in control of the Company. The Company is party to an employment agreement with Mr. Weller which provides that Mr. Weller is to serve as President and Chief Operating Officer of the Company with responsibility for the day-to-day management of the Company. The employment term, which began on January 31, 1994, was originally for a three year period, and was automatically extended, as of January 31, 1996 and January 31, 1997. The agreement will be extended for new three-year terms beginning on each January 31 thereafter unless the Company gives Mr. Weller written notice at least 60 days prior to January 31 in a year that the term is not to be extended. Mr. Weller's annual base salary under the agreement currently is $305,000. In accordance with the employment agreement, on December 14, 1993, the Company granted Mr. Weller non-qualified stock options to purchase 100,000 Shares of the Company at an exercise price equal to the fair market value of the Shares on such date. Messrs. George F. Rubin's and Edward A. Glickman's employment contracts are for two years and are automatically renewable for year-to-year terms thereafter unless prior notice is given by either party. In many respects, these contracts otherwise contain terms similar to those of the contract with Ronald Rubin, except that the severance payments upon a change in control are equal to two times the individual's base salary and S-49
424B554th Page of 167TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 54th
targeted incentive compensation, subject to reduction to satisfy limitations on deductibility, and the individual may only obtain such payment if he resigns for Good Reason (as defined in the agreements) following a change in control. The annual base rates of compensation under such agreements for Messrs. George F. Rubin and Edward A. Glickman are $250,000 and $230,000 per annum, respectively. The Company is also party to employment agreements with Messrs. Jeffrey A. Linn and Dante J. Massimini. Mr. Linn's contract extends until December 31, 2000. Mr. Massimini's employment agreement will expire on September 30, 1999. Mr. Linn serves as Senior Vice President-Acquisitions and Secretary and Mr. Massimini serves as Senior Vice President-Finance and Treasurer. The current annual base compensation for Mr. Linn and Mr. Massimini is $134,375 and $128,365, respectively. Cash Incentive Bonus Plan Incentive Bonus Plan. The Company has established an incentive bonus plan, effective January 1, 1998, for certain officers and key employees of the Company. The plan is a nonqualified, unfunded plan with bonuses to be paid from the general assets of the Company. The Executive Compensation and Human Resources Committee of the Board of Trustees administers the plan. The Committee has designated those officers and key employees who are eligible to receive a bonus under the plan, and each of the individuals who entered into employment agreements in connection with the TRO Transaction have been included as eligible to participate in the plan. A bonus pool has been created equal to a graduated percentage of "Adjusted Funds Available for Distribution," which is generally defined as funds from operations less certain adjustments, including annual capital expenditures, reserves for capital expenditures, distributions by the Company and working capital reserves. One-half of the pool will be paid to the participants based on set individual percentages. All or a portion of the remainder of the pool may be awarded by senior management (in its discretion, but subject to the approval of the Committee) to any of the participants in the plan and/or to any other employees of the Company who achieve the goals and objectives stated in the Trust's business plan. The plan provides that in no event will incentive compensation paid under the plan exceed $1,500,000 in any plan year. Bonuses will be paid in single-sum cash payments within a reasonable time after the Company's fiscal year-end financial statements are approved. Except as provided in a participant's employment agreement, only participants who are employed by the Company on December 31 of each plan year will be eligible to receive payments under the plan (unless the participant was no longer an employee due to a reorganization, or because he retired on or after age 65, became disabled, or died). PREIT-RUBIN Stock Bonus Plan Contemporaneously with the closing of the TRO Transaction, PREIT-RUBIN established a stock bonus plan for all of its employees who have completed at least one year of service on the day prior to the effective date of the plan. The plan will qualify for favorable tax treatment under section 401(a) of the Internal Revenue Code and all of the outstanding voting common shares of PREIT-RUBIN will be held by the trust established under the plan. PREIT-RUBIN issued all of its voting common shares to the plan for the plan year ending December 31, 1997. The shares will be allocated to the plan accounts of the eligible employees as of December 31, 1997, pro rata, based on their covered compensation for 1997. The shares held by the plan will be appraised annually as of each December 31. The value of an employee's account under the plan will be paid to the employee upon termination of service. Since the articles of incorporation of PREIT-RUBIN restrict ownership of all of the outstanding voting common shares of PREIT-RUBIN to employees of PREIT-RUBIN or to a tax-qualified plan for the benefit of employees, benefits to terminated employees will be paid only in cash. Voting on major corporate transactions (including mergers, recapitalizations, liquidations, and similar transactions) will be passed through by the plan trustee to the plan's participants. Voting by the plan trustee on other matters will be directed by majority vote of the Stock Bonus Plan Committee, who will be appointed by the Board of Directors of PREIT-RUBIN. S-50
424B555th Page of 167TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 55th
Other Benefit Plans The Company maintains a 401(k) profit sharing and retirement savings plan in which substantially all of the officers and employees are eligible to participate and a Supplemental Retirement Plan in which the executive officers named in the Summary Compensation Table other than Mr. Cohen are participants. Under the Supplemental Retirement Plan, the Company is required to make defined contributions to the plan annually in amounts equal to amounts that would have been required to be contributed under the Company's defined benefit pension plan, which was terminated in fiscal 1995, in order to fund the targeted retirement benefit (after taking into account amounts distributed under the terminated defined benefit pension plan, together with an assumed rate of return thereon). The Company has recorded $92,000, $160,000 and $168,000 of contributions due under the provisions of the Supplemental Retirement Plan for the years ended August 31, 1997, 1996 and 1995, respectively. Independent Trustee Compensation Trustees who are not officers of the Company receive an annual retainer of $7,000 plus $1,250 per Board of Trustees meeting attended and $750 per Committee meeting attended. The Company made one-time cash payments of $25,000 each to Mr. Jack Farber and Mr. Robert Freedman upon their resignations as Trustees in August and September, 1997, respectively, after 26 years and nine years of service, respectively. The Company also made one-time cash payments in 1997 of $10,000 to each of the three members of the Special Acquisition Committee of the Board which met in 1996 and 1997 in connection with the negotiation of the TRO Transaction. S-51
424B556th Page of 167TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 56th
PRINCIPAL SECURITYHOLDERS The following table sets forth certain information regarding the beneficial ownership of Shares and OP Units by: (i) each trustee of the Company; (ii) each executive officer of the Company; (iii) all trustees and executive officers of the Company as a group; and (iv) each person or entity who is expected to be the beneficial owner of 5% or more of the outstanding Shares immediately following the completion of the Offering. Except as indicated below, all of such Shares and OP Units are owned directly, and the indicated person has sole voting and investment power. The extent to which a person holds OP Units is set forth in the footnotes below. The address of each person listed below is c/o Pennsylvania Real Estate Investment Trust, 455 Pennsylvania Avenue, Suite 135, Fort Washington, Pennsylvania 19034. · Enlarge/Download Table Shares and OP Units Beneficially Owned(1) ----------------------------------------------- Percentage Percentage Before the After the Name Number Offering Offering -------------------------------------- ------------------ ------------ ----------- Sylvan M. Cohen ..................... 650,291 (2) 6.9% 4.9% Ronald Rubin ........................ 143,584 (3) 1.5 1.1 Jonathan B. Weller .................. 105,910 (4) 1.1 * George F. Rubin ..................... 87,523 (5) * * William R. Dimeling .................. 7,187 (6) * * Rosemarie B. Greco .................. 0 * * Lee H. Javitch ..................... 5,500 (6) * * Leonard I. Korman .................. 482,663 (7) 5.2 3.6 Jeffrey P. Orleans .................. 51,413 (8) * * Edward A. Glickman .................. 13,606 (9) * * Jeffrey A. Linn ..................... 29,771 (10) * * Dante J. Massimini .................. 20,931 (11) * * --------- ---- ---- All Trustees and executive officers as a group (12 persons) ......... 1,586,338 (12) 16.7% 11.7% ============ ==== ==== ------------ * Less than one percent (1) All data on holdings are as of November 1, 1997. Unless otherwise indicated in the following footnotes, each Trustee and Non-Trustee executive officer has sole voting and investment power with respect to all such Shares and OP Units. (2) Includes 186,558 Shares owned by Mr. Cohen's spouse, 37,056 Shares owned by a trust of which Mr. Cohen's wife is a co-trustee, 252 Shares owned by a corporation 50% of whose outstanding shares are owned by Mr. Cohen and the remaining 50% of whose outstanding shares are owned by Jeffrey P. Orleans, a Trustee of the Company, 71,815 Shares owned by a charitable remainder unitrust of which Mr. Cohen is a co-trustee, and 28,523 Shares subject to options that are currently exercisable. Mr. Cohen disclaims beneficial ownership of all of the Shares referred to in this footnote other than Shares owned by trusts of which Mr. Cohen is a trustee or a co-trustee, Shares owned of record by Mr. Cohen's wife and the Shares subject to options. (3) Represents Class A OP Units first redeemable on September 30, 1998 for cash or, at the option of the Company, for a like number of Shares. (4) Includes 94,710 Shares subject to options that are currently exercisable, and 400 Shares held by Mr. Weller as custodian for his children under the New York Uniform Gifts to Minors Act. (5) Includes 900 Shares held by a trust, the beneficiary of which is Mr. Rubin's daughter. Mr. Rubin is not a trustee of that trust. Also includes 500 shares held by Mr. Rubin's spouse. Mr. Rubin disclaims beneficial ownership of all Shares referred to in this footnote. Also includes 86,123 Class A OP Units first redeemable on September 30, 1998 for cash or, at the option of the Company, a like number of Shares. (6) Includes 5,500 Shares subject to options that are currently exercisable. (7) Includes: (i) 420 Shares owned by Mr. Korman's spouse; (ii) 87,570 Shares held by a charitable foundation of which Mr. Korman is a co-trustee; and (iii) 151,585 Shares held by trusts of which Mr. Korman is a co-trustee. Mr. Korman disclaims beneficial ownership of all but 10,528 of the foregoing Shares. S-52
424B557th Page of 167TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 57th
(8) Includes 450 Shares owned by Mr. Orleans' spouse, 1,000 Shares for which Mr. Orleans is custodian for his children under the Pennsylvania Uniform Gifts to Minors Act, 947 Shares owned by an adult daughter of Mr. Orleans, 360 Shares held by trusts of which Mr. Orleans is co-trustee, 252 Shares owned by a corporation 50% of whose shares are owned by Mr. Orleans and the remaining 50% of whose shares are owned by Sylvan M. Cohen, Chairman of the Board of Trustees of the Company and 3,000 Shares subject to options that are currently exercisable. Mr. Orleans disclaims beneficial ownership of the Shares owned by Mr. Orleans' wife and certain Shares for which he serves as custodian under the Pennsylvania Uniform Gifts to Minors Act. (9) Represents Class A OP Units redeemable first on September 30, 1998 for cash or, at the option of the Company, a like number of Shares. (10) Includes 21,431 Shares subject to options that are currently exercisable and 500 Shares that are held by Mr. Linn as custodian for his son under the Pennsylvania Uniform Gifts to Minors Act. (11) Includes 20,331 Shares subject to options that are currently exercisable. (12) Includes 178,995 Shares subject to options that are currently exercisable. In certain instances, two Trustees beneficially own the same Shares because they share voting or investment power over such Shares. Such Shares have been counted only once in this total. S-53
424B558th Page of 167TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 58th
UNDERWRITING The underwriters of the Offering (the "Underwriters"), for whom Lehman Brothers Inc., Legg Mason Wood Walker, Incorporated, Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated, Smith Barney Inc. and Wheat, First Securities, Inc. are acting as representatives (the "Representatives"), have severally agreed, subject to the conditions contained in the Underwriting Agreement (the form of which is incorporated by reference as an exhibit to the Registration Statement of which the accompanying Prospectus forms a part), to purchase from the Company, and the Company has agreed to sell to each Underwriter, the aggregate number of Shares set forth below opposite the name of each such Underwriter. Number of Underwriters Shares ------------------------------------------------------------- ---------- Lehman Brothers Inc. .................................... 800,000 Legg Mason Wood Walker, Incorporated ..................... 800,000 Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated ...... 800,000 Smith Barney Inc. ....................................... 800,000 Wheat, First Securities, Inc. ........................... 800,000 Total ................................................ 4,000,000 ========= The Underwriting Agreement provides that the obligations of the Underwriters to purchase the Shares are subject to certain conditions, and that if any of the Shares are purchased by the Underwriters, all such Shares must be so purchased. The Company has been advised by the Underwriters that they propose to offer the Shares directly to the public initially at the public offering price set forth on the cover page of this Prospectus Supplement, and to certain dealers at such public offering price less a selling concession not in excess of $.75 per share. The selected dealers may reallow a concession not in excess of $.10 per share to certain brokers or dealers. After the Offering, the public offering price, the concession to selected dealers, and the reallowance may be changed by the Representatives. The Company has agreed to indemnify the Underwriters against certain liabilities, including liabilities under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or to contribute to the payments the Underwriters may be required to make in respect thereof. The Company has granted to the Underwriters an option to purchase up to an additional 600,000 Shares at the public offering price, less underwriting discounts and commissions, solely to cover over-allotments, if any. The Underwriters may exercise this option at any time within 30 days after the date of this Prospectus Supplement. To the extent that the Underwriters exercise this option, each Underwriter will be obligated, subject to certain conditions, to purchase a number of additional Shares proportionate to such Underwriter's initial commitment as indicated in the preceding table. The Company, certain executive officers and trustees who own OP Units or Shares and the holders of the outstanding Class B OP Units have agreed, for a period of 90 days from the date of this Prospectus Supplement, not to, directly or indirectly, offer for sale, sell or otherwise dispose of (or enter into any transaction or device which is designed to, or could be expected to, result in the disposition by any person at any time in the future of) Shares (other than the Shares offered hereby and Shares issued pursuant to the stock options outstanding on the date hereof and any OP Units or Shares that may be issued in connection with any acquisition of a property or in connection with the redemption of OP Units) or sell or grant options, rights or warrants with respect to any Shares (other than the grant of options pursuant to the stock option plans existing on the date hereof), without the prior written consent of Lehman Brothers Inc. At the request of the Company, the Underwriters have reserved up to 40,000 Shares for sale at the public offering price to certain trustees of the Company. The number of Shares available to the general public will be reduced to the extent these persons purchase the reserved Shares. Any reserved Shares that are not so purchased by such persons at the closing of the Offering will be offered by the Underwriters to the general public on the same terms as the other Shares offered by this Prospectus Supplement. S-54
424B559th Page of 167TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 59th
Until the distribution of the Shares is completed, rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission may limit the ability of the Underwriters and certain selling group members to bid for and purchase Shares. As an exception to these rules, the Representatives are permitted to engage in certain transactions that stabilize the price of the Shares. Such transactions may consist of bids or purchases for the purpose of pegging, fixing or maintaining the price of the Shares. If the Underwriters create a short position in the Shares in connection with the Offering (i.e., if they sell more Shares than are set forth on the cover page of this Prospectus Supplement), the Representatives may reduce that short position by purchasing Shares in the open market. The Representatives also may elect to reduce any short position by exercising all or part of the over-allotment option described herein. The Representatives also may impose a penalty bid on certain Underwriters and selling group members. This means that if the Representatives purchase Shares in the open market to reduce the Underwriters' short position or to stabilize the price of the Shares, they may reclaim the amount of the selling concession from the Underwriters and selling group members who sold those Shares as part of the Offering. In general, purchases of a security for the purpose of stabilization or to reduce a syndicate short position could cause the price of the security to be higher than it might otherwise be in the absence of such purchases. The imposition of a penalty bid might have an effect on the price of a security to the extent that it were to discourage resales of the security by purchasers in the Offering. Neither the Company nor any of the Underwriters makes any representation or prediction as to the direction or magnitude of any effect that the transactions described above may have on the price of the Shares. In addition, neither the Company nor any of the Underwriters makes any representation that the Representatives will engage in such transactions or that such transactions, once commenced, will not be discontinued without notice. The Company retained Lehman Brothers Inc. as its exclusive financial advisor in connection with the TRO Transaction, and the Company paid Lehman Brothers Inc. a fee of $1,750,000 for such services. EXPERTS The financial statements and financial statement schedules included or incorporated by reference in this Prospectus Supplement, to the extent and for the periods indicated in their reports, have been audited by Arthur Andersen LLP, independent public accountants, and are included herein in reliance upon the authority of said firm as experts in giving said reports. LEGAL MATTERS The validity of the Shares offered hereby and the statements in the accompanying Prospectus under "Federal Income Tax Considerations" will be passed upon for the Company by Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP. Sylvan M. Cohen, Chairman of the Board of the Company and a principal shareholder of the Company, is of counsel to Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP. Certain legal matters will be passed upon for the Underwriters by Hogan & Hartson L.L.P. S-55
424B560th Page of 167TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 60th
PENNSYLVANIA REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS · Enlarge/Download Table UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONSOLIDATING FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Pro Forma Consolidating Balance Sheet as of August 31, 1997 .............................. F-3 Pro Forma Consolidating Income Statement for the Year Ended August 31, 1997 ............ F-4 Notes and Management's Assumptions to Unaudited Pro Forma Consolidating Financial Statements ............................................................................. F-5 PENNSYLVANIA REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST Report of Independent Public Accountants ................................................ F-9 Consolidated Balance Sheets as of August 31, 1997 and 1996 .............................. F-10 Consolidated Statements of Income for the Years Ended August 31, 1997, 1996 and 1995 ... F-11 Consolidated Statements of Shareholders' Equity for the Years Ended August 31, 1997, 1996 and 1995 ............................................................................... F-12 Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended August 31, 1997, 1996 and 1995 F-13 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements ............................................. F-14 THE RUBIN ORGANIZATION, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY Report of Independent Public Accountants ................................................ F-23 Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 30, 1997 (unaudited), December 31, 1996 and December 31, 1995 (unaudited) ............................................................ F-24 Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Years Ended December 31, 1996, 1995 (unaudited) and 1994 (unaudited) and for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 1997 and 1996 (unaudited) ................................................................... F-26 Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity for the Years Ended December 31, 1996, 1995 (unaudited) and 1994 (unaudited) and for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 1997 (unaudited) ............................................................................ F-27 Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 1996, 1995 (unaudited) and 1994 (unaudited) and for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 1997 and 1996 (unaudited) ................................................................... F-28 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements ............................................. F-30 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF OXFORD VALLEY ROAD ASSOCIATES Report of Independent Public Accountants ................................................ F-41 Balance Sheet as of September 30, 1997 ................................................... F-42 Statement of Operations for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 1997 ..................... F-43 Statement of Partners' Capital for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 1997 ............ F-44 Statement of Cash Flows for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 1997 ..................... F-45 Notes to Financial Statements ............................................................ F-46 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF NORTH DARTMOUTH MALL Report of Independent Public Accountants ................................................ F-50 Statements of Revenues and Certain Expenses for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 1997 and the Year Ended December 31, 1996 .................................................. F-51 Notes to Statements of Revenues and Certain Expenses .................................... F-52 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF MAGNOLIA MALL Report of Independent Public Accountants ................................................ F-53 Statements of Revenues and Certain Expenses for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 1997 and the Year Ended December 31, 1996 .................................................. F-54 Notes to Statements of Revenues and Certain Expenses .................................... F-55 F-1
424B561st Page of 167TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 61st
PENNSYLVANIA REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST PRO FORMA CONSOLIDATING FINANCIAL INFORMATION The following sets forth the pro forma consolidating balance sheet of Pennsylvania Real Estate Investment Trust (the "Company") as of August 31, 1997 and the pro forma consolidating statement of operations for the year ended August 31, 1997 to give effect to the following transactions: The Offering The Company consummated the Offering and applied the net proceeds therefrom as described under "Use of Proceeds," including: o The Company issued 4,000,000 Shares at $22 3/8 per Share. o The $8.8 million Cobblestone Mortgage was prepaid in full. o The remaining net proceeds of the Offering were used to repay amounts outstanding under the Credit Facility. The TRO Transaction On September 30, 1997, PREIT and TRO completed the TRO Transaction, pursuant to which: o PREIT capitalized the Operating Partnership by transferring to it substantially all of its assets or the beneficial interests therein, subject to its liabilities. o The Operating Partnership acquired all of the non-voting common shares, constituting 95% of the economic interests of PREIT-RUBIN, in exchange for 200,000 Class A OP Units and the obligation to issue up to 800,000 additional Class A OP Units over the next five years according to a formula based upon the Company's per share growth in adjusted funds from operations. o The Operating Partnership acquired the interests of certain affiliates of TRO ("TRO Affiliates") in The Court at Oxford Valley, Magnolia Mall, North Dartmouth Mall and Springfield Park. o The Operating Partnership agreed to acquire the interests of certain TRO Affiliates in Hillview Shopping Center and Northeast Tower Center, both of which are currently under construction, at prices based upon a pre-determined formula. o The Operating Partnership acquired the development rights of certain TRO Affiliates, subject to related obligations, in Christiana Power Center (Phases I & II), Red Rose Commons and Blue Route Metroplex. As the acquisitions of Hillview Shopping Center, Northeast Tower Center and the Development Properties are expected to occur in the future at amounts that are not currently determinable, the financial impact of such future events has not been reflected in the accompanying pro forma financial statements. All of the acquisitions described above have been recorded by the Company using the purchase method of accounting. The accompanying pro forma consolidating financial information is presented as if the transactions described above had been consummated on August 31, 1997 for balance sheet purposes and September 1, 1996 for purposes of the statement of operations. This unaudited pro forma consolidating financial information should be read in conjunction with the historical financial statements of the Company, The Rubin Organization, Inc., Magnolia Mall, North Dartmouth Mall and Oxford Valley Road Associates and the related notes thereto all included elsewhere herein. In management's opinion, all adjustments necessary to reflect the effects of the transactions have been made. The pro forma consolidating financial information is unaudited and is not necessarily indicative of what the actual financial position or results of operations of the Company would have been had the transactions described above been consummated as of the dates indicated, nor does it purport to represent the future financial position and the results of operations of the Company. F-2
424B562nd Page of 167TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 62nd
PENNSYLVANIA REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST PRO FORMA CONSOLIDATING BALANCE SHEET AS OF AUGUST 31, 1997 (Unaudited) (in thousands) · Enlarge/Download Table The Company PREIT The TRO The Pro Forma, Historical Transaction Offering as Adjusted ------------ -------------------- ------------------ ------------ Assets Investments in real estate, at cost Retail properties .............................. $ 37,398 $ 82,322 (A) $ -- $ 119,720 Multifamily properties ........................ 159,967 -- -- 159,967 Industrial properties ........................... 5,078 -- -- 5,078 --------- ---------- ---------- --------- Total investments in real estate ............ 202,443 82,322 -- 284,765 Less accumulated depreciation ............... 50,711 -- -- 50,711 --------- ---------- ---------- --------- 151,732 82,322 -- 234,054 Property under development ..................... -- 1,950 (B) -- 1,950 Investment in PREIT-RUBIN ........................ -- 4,595 (C) -- 4,595 Investments in partnerships and joint ventures, at equity ........................... 1,039 13,269 (D) -- 14,308 Advances to PREIT-RUBIN ........................ -- 1,613 (E) -- 1,613 --------- ---------- ---------- --------- 152,771 103,749 -- 256,520 Less allowance for possible losses ........... 1,831 -- -- 1,831 --------- ---------- ---------- --------- 150,940 103,749 -- 254,689 Other Assets: Cash and cash equivalents ..................... 1,399 -- -- 1,399 Rents and sundry receivables .................. 590 -- -- 590 Deferred costs, prepaid real estate taxes and expenses, net ........................... 7,393 (1,770) (F) -- 5,623 Deposits on properties ........................ 5,335 (5,000)(G) -- 335 --------- ---------- ---------- --------- Total Assets .................................... $ 165,657 $ 96,979 $ -- $ 262,636 ========= ========== ========== ========= Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity Mortgage notes payable ........................... $ 83,528 $ 25,200 (H) $ (8,847)(K) $ 99,881 Bank and other loans payable ..................... 33,884 56,647 (I) (74,343)(L) 16,188 Tenants' deposits and deferred rents ............ 1,346 -- -- 1,346 Accrued pension and other benefits ............... 1,091 -- -- 1,091 Accrued expenses and other liabilities ......... 4,369 -- -- 4,369 --------- ---------- ---------- --------- Total Liabilities .............................. 124,218 81,847 (83,190) 122,875 --------- ---------- ---------- --------- Minority interest .............................. 540 15,132 (J) -- 15,672 --------- ---------- ---------- --------- Shareholders' Equity Shares of beneficial interest .................. 8,685 -- 4,000 (M) 12,685 Additional paid in capital ..................... 53,599 -- 79,190 (M) 132,789 Distributions in excess of net income ............ (21,385) -- -- (21,385) --------- ---------- ---------- --------- Total Shareholders' Equity ..................... 40,899 -- 83,190 124,089 --------- ---------- ---------- --------- Total Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity ...... $ 165,657 $ 96,979 $ -- $ 262,636 ========= ========== ========== ========= The accompanying notes and management's assumptions are an integral part of this statement. F-3
424B563rd Page of 167TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 63rd
PENNSYLVANIA REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST PRO FORMA CONSOLIDATING INCOME STATEMENT FOR THE YEAR ENDED AUGUST 31, 1997 (Unaudited) (In thousands, except share and per share data) · Enlarge/Download Table The Company PREIT The TRO The Pro Forma Historical Transaction Offering as Adjusted ------------ ------------------ ------------------- ------------ Revenues Gross revenues from real estate .................. $ 40,231 $ 12,490(a) $ -- $ 52,721 Interest and other income ........................ 254 234(b) -- 488 -------- -------- ---------- -------- Total revenues ................................. 40,485 12,724 -- 53,209 -------- -------- ---------- -------- Expenses Property operating expenses ..................... 16,289 3,964(a) -- 20,253 Depreciation and amortization .................. 6,259 2,557(c) -- 8,816 General and administrative expenses ............ 3,324 -- -- 3,324 Interest expense ................................. 9,086 6,183(d) (6,102) (h) 9,167 Provisions for losses on investments ............ 500 -- -- 500 -------- -------- ---------- -------- Total expenses ................................. 35,458 12,704 (6,102) 42,060 -------- -------- ---------- -------- Income before gains on sales of interests in real estate, equity in unconsolidated entities and minority interest .................. 5,027 20 6,102 11,149 Equity in loss of PREIT-RUBIN .................. -- (80) (e) -- (80) Equity in income of partnerships and joint ventures ....................................... 4,337 420(f) -- 4,757 Gains on sales of interests in real estate ...... 1,069 -- -- 1,069 -------- -------- ---------- -------- Income before minority interest .................. 10,433 360 6,102 16,895 Minority interest .............................. (198) (731) (g) (70) (i) (999) -------- -------- ---------- -------- Net income ....................................... $ 10,235 $ (371) $ 6,032 $ 15,896 ======== ======== ========== ======== Net income per Share ........................... $ 1.18 $ 1.25 Weighted average number of Shares outstanding .................................... 8,679 12,679 The accompanying notes and management's assumptions are an integral part of this statement. F-4
424B564th Page of 167TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 64th
PENNSYLVANIA REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST NOTES TO MANAGEMENT'S ASSUMPTIONS TO UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONSOLIDATING BALANCE SHEET · Enlarge/Download Table (A) To record the acquisition of wholly owned retail properties as follows: o Purchase price of Magnolia Mall, including $998 of allocated transaction costs... $ 46,363 o Purchase price of North Dartmouth Mall, including $959 of allocated transaction costs ........................................................................... 35,959 --------- Total investment in wholly owned retail properties .............................. $ 82,322 ========= (B) To record the Operating Partnership's acquisition of development assets, including transactions costs ............................................................... $ 1,950 ========= (C) To record the acquisition of 95% of the common stock of PREIT-RUBIN for 200,000 Class A OP Units at $23.40 per unit and $793 of allocated transaction costs, net of cash acquired of $878............................................................... $ 4,595 ========= (D) To record the Operating Partnership's investments in joint ventures: o Investment in The Court at Oxford Valley for approximately 233,000 Class A OP Units at $23.40 per unit and $688 of allocated transaction costs ............... $ 6,140 o TRO's and TRO Affiliates' rights under Goldenberg Letter Agreement ............ 6,442 o Development costs related to Christiana Power Center Phase I .................. 687 --------- Net investment in partnerships and joint ventures ................................. $ 13,269 ========= (E) To advance PREIT-RUBIN funds for the reimbursement of EPDLP management contract start-up costs and pre-development expenses .............................. $ 1,613 ========= (F) To adjust deferred costs: o Reclassify previously capitalized transaction costs ........................... $ (2,545) o Financing costs incurred relating to the $150.0 million Credit Facility ......... 775 --------- $ (1,770) ========= (G) To reclassify the deposit on purchase of Magnolia Mall to retail properties ...... $ (5,000) ========= (H) To record the mortgage note payable assumed in connection with the purchase of Magnolia Mall ..................................................................... $ 25,200 ========= (I) To record borrowings under the Credit Facility: o Purchase of Magnolia Mall and North Dartmouth Mall .............................. $ 45,165 o Fund the remaining cash portion of the TRO Transaction, including transaction costs ........................................................................... 11,482 --------- Total borrowings under the Credit Facility ....................................... $ 56,647 ========= (J) To record minority interest as follows: o OP Units issued to acquire PREIT-RUBIN .......................................... $ 4,680 o OP Units issued in connection with Magnolia Mall acquisition .................. 5,000 o OP Units issued to acquire interest in the Court at Oxford Valley ............... 5,452 --------- Total minority interest ......................................................... $ 15,132 ========= (K) Repayment of the outstanding Cobblestone Mortgage ................................. $ 8,847 ========= (L) Repayment of outstanding borrowings under the Credit Facility ..................... $ 74,343 ========= (M) Net proceeds of Offering calculated as follows: Gross proceeds of Offering ......................................................... $ 89,500 Less: Underwriting discounts and commissions ....................................... (5,360) Other transaction costs ...................................................... (950) --------- Net proceeds of Offering ................................................... $ 83,190 ========= Shares issued at $1 par value ................................................ $ 4,000 ========= Additional paid in capital ................................................... $ 79,190 ========= F-5
424B565th Page of 167TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 65th
PENNSYLVANIA REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST NOTES TO MANAGEMENT'S ASSUMPTIONS TO UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONSOLIDATING INCOME STATEMENT (a) To record the income and expenses associated with the acquisition of wholly owned retail properties as follows: · Download Table North Magnolia Dartmouth Shopping Mall Mall Centers Historical Historical Pro Forma ------------ ------------ ---------- Revenues Gross revenues from real estate ...... $ 6,222 6,268 $ 12,490 Interest and other income ............ 17 15 32 ------- ----- -------- 6,239 6,283 12,522 Expenses Property operating expenses ......... 1,728 2,236 3,964 ------- ----- -------- EBITDA .............................. $ 4,511 $ 4,047 $ 8,558 ======= ======= ======== · Enlarge/Download Table (b) To record additional interest and other income as follows: Interest and other income of Magnolia Mall and North Dartmouth Mall ............... $ 32 Accrual of interest income on note receivable from PREIT-RUBIN ..................... 202 ------- $ 234 ======= (c) To record additional depreciation expense as follows: Magnolia Mall -- depreciable basis of $45,998 over 30-year useful life ............ $ 1,533 North Dartmouth Mall -- depreciable basis of $30,709 over 30-year useful life ...... 1,024 ------- $ 2,557 ======= (d) To record additional interest expense as follows: Magnolia Mall $25,200 mortgage note payable assumed at 8.20%........................ $ 2,066 Magnolia Mall bank borrowings of $10,165 at 7.25% to fund remaining purchase price 737 North Dartmouth Mall bank borrowings of $35,000 at 7.25% to fund purchase price ... 2,538 Deposit of $5,000 at 7.25% ......................................................... 363 Bank borrowings of $11,482 at 7.25% to fund the cash portion of transaction costs... 832 Less capitalized interest on bank borrowings for property under development ...... (605) Net increase in amortization of financing costs related to Credit Facility ......... 252 ------- $ 6,183 ======= F-6
424B566th Page of 167TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 66th
PENNSYLVANIA REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST NOTES TO MANAGEMENT'S ASSUMPTIONS TO UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONSOLIDATING INCOME STATEMENT (e) To record equity in income (loss) of PREIT-RUBIN as follows: · Enlarge/Download Table TRO Pro Forma Historical Adjustments Pro Forma ------------ ------------- --------------- Revenues Management fees ................................. $ 6,171 $ -- $ 6,171 Leasing commissions .............................. 9,605 -- 9,605 Consulting fees ................................. 1,763 -- 1,763 Development fees ................................. 581 -- 581 Publication income .............................. 2,201 -- 2,201 Other income .................................... 147 -- 147 ------- ------ ------- Total revenues ................................. 20,468 -- 20,468 ------- ------ ------- Operating Expenses Salaries, commissions, temporary services, payroll taxes and employee benefits ..................... 11,781 300(1) 12,081 Rent expense .................................... 784 -- 784 Other operating expenses ........................ 3,744 -- 3,744 Depreciation and amortization ..................... 961 -- 961 Non-recurring expenses associated with the TRO Transaction .................................... 890 -- 890 Expenses for start-up of EPDLP management contracts ....................................... 951 -- 951 ------- -------- ------- Total operating expenses ........................ 19,111 300 19,411 ------- -------- ------- Income from operations ........................... 1,357 (300) 1,057 Interest expense ................................. (891) 362(2) (529) Equity in loss from partnership investments ...... (131) 131(3) 0 ------- -------- ------- Income before income taxes ........................ 335 193 528 Provision for income taxes ........................ -- (211) (211)(4) ------- -------- ------- Net income .......................................... $ 335 $ (18) 317 ======= ======== ======= Amortization of excess purchase price over net assets acquired recorded in consolidation .......................................... (401)(5) Net loss after intangible amortization ....................................... $ (84) ======= Operating Partnership's interest (95%) in loss of PREIT-RUBIN ............... $ (80)(6) ======= ------------ · Enlarge/Download Table (1) To record additional compensation expense in accordance with existing employment contracts (2) To adjust interest expense as follows: o Elimination of interest on debt not assumed .................................... $ 564 o Accrual of interest on note payable to PREIT .................................... (202) ------ $ 362 ====== (3) To eliminate equity in loss of partnerships and joint ventures not being acquired. (4) Estimated tax provision calculated using 40% effective tax rate. (5) To record amortization of excess purchase price over net assets acquired over a ten-year amortization period. (6) Represents 95% of PREIT-RUBIN's net loss after intangible amortization. F-7
424B567th Page of 167TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 67th
PENNSYLVANIA REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST NOTES TO MANAGEMENT'S ASSUMPTIONS TO UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONSOLIDATING INCOME STATEMENT · Enlarge/Download Table (f) To record the Company 50% share of income from The Court at Oxford Valley: o Equity in the net income of The Court at Oxford Valley ........................ $ 605 o Less amortization of the excess purchase price over the net book value of assets acquired .......................................................................... (185) ------- $ 420 ======= (g) To adjust the minority interest's share of the income in the Operating Partnership (6.9% prior to the consummation of the Offering). .................................. $ (731) ======= (h) To record the interest expense savings associated with the repayment of the following debt amounts: o Payment of the Cobblestone Mortgage ................................................ $ 690 o Payment of bank borrowings incurred in connection with the TRO Transaction ......... 4,469 o Payment of other bank borrowings ................................................... 943 ------- $ 6,102 ======= (i) To adjust the minority interest's share of income in the Operating Partnership (4.8% following the consummation of the Offering) $ (70) ======= F-8
424B568th Page of 167TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 68th
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS To Pennsylvania Real Estate Investment Trust: We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Pennsylvania Real Estate Investment Trust (a Pennsylvania Trust) and Subsidiaries as of August 31, 1997 and 1996, and the related consolidated statements of income, shareholders' equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended August 31, 1997. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Trust's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We did not audit the 1997, 1996 and 1995 financial statements of Lehigh Valley Mall Associates, a partnership in which the Trust has a 50 percent interest which is reflected in the accompanying financial statements using the equity method of accounting. The equity in net income of Lehigh Valley Mall Associates represents 23 percent, 31 percent and 32 percent of net income in 1997, 1996 and 1995, respectively. The financial statements of Lehigh Valley Mall Associates were audited by other auditors whose report has been furnished to us and our opinion, insofar as it relates to the amounts included for Lehigh Valley Mall Associates, is based solely on the report of the other auditors. We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, based upon our audit and the report of other auditors, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Pennsylvania Real Estate Investment Trust and Subsidiaries as of August 31, 1997 and 1996, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended August 31, 1997 in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP Philadelphia, Pa., October 17, 1997 F-9
424B569th Page of 167TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 69th
PENNSYLVANIA REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AT AUGUST 31 · Enlarge/Download Table 1997 1996 ---------------- ---------------- Assets Investments in real estate, at cost (Notes 1 and 3): Retail properties ...................................................... $ 37,398,000 $ 37,362,000 Multifamily properties ................................................... 159,967,000 156,102,000 Industrial properties ................................................... 5,078,000 5,078,000 ------------- ------------- Total investments in real estate ....................................... 202,443,000 198,542,000 Less accumulated depreciation ....................................... 50,711,000 44,693,000 ------------- ------------- 151,732,000 153,849,000 Investments in partnerships and joint ventures, at equity (Notes 1 and 2) 1,039,000 16,995,000 Notes receivable ......................................................... -- 1,649,000 ------------- ------------- 152,771,000 172,493,000 Less allowance for possible losses (Note 1) ........................... 1,831,000 2,042,000 ------------- ------------- 150,940,000 170,451,000 Other Assets: Cash and cash equivalents ............................................. 1,399,000 1,030,000 Rents and sundry receivables .......................................... 590,000 608,000 Deferred costs, prepaid real estate taxes and expenses, net (Note 1) 7,393,000 5,636,000 Deposits on properties (Notes 1 and 10) .............................. 5,335,000 -- ------------- ------------- Total assets ............................................................ $ 165,657,000 $ 177,725,000 ============= ============= Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity Mortgage notes payable (Note 3) .......................................... $ 83,528,000 $ 84,833,000 Bank loans payable (Note 3) ............................................. 33,884,000 39,315,000 Tenants' deposits and deferred rents .................................... 1,346,000 1,422,000 Accrued pension and retirement benefits (Notes 1 and 4) .................. 1,091,000 1,207,000 Accrued expenses and other liabilities ................................. 4,369,000 3,901,000 ------------- ------------- Total liabilities ...................................................... 124,218,000 130,678,000 Minority interest in consolidated partnership (Note 1) .................. 540,000 542,000 Commitments and contingencies (Note 7) ................................. -- -- Shareholders' equity: ($4.71 and $5.36 per share at August 31, 1997 and 1996) (Notes 1 and 5): Shares of Beneficial Interest, $1 par; authorized, unlimited; issued and outstanding 8,685,098 Shares in 1997 and 8,676,098 in 1996 ............ 8,685,000 8,676,000 Additional paid in capital ............................................. 53,599,000 53,133,000 Distributions in excess of net income .................................... (21,385,000) (15,304,000) Total shareholders' equity ............................................. 40,899,000 46,505,000 ------------- ------------- Total liabilities and shareholders' equity .............................. $ 165,657,000 $ 177,725,000 ============= ============= The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements. F-10
424B570th Page of 167TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 70th
PENNSYLVANIA REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME FOR THE YEARS ENDED AUGUST 31 · Enlarge/Download Table 1997 1996 1995 ---------------- ---------------- ---------------- Revenues Gross revenues from real estate (Note 6) .................. $ 40,231,000 $ 38,985,000 $ 36,978,000 Interest and other income ................................. 254,000 171,000 176,000 ------------ ------------ ------------ Total revenues .......................................... 40,485,000 39,156,000 37,154,000 ------------ ------------ ------------ Expenses Property operating expenses .............................. 16,289,000 16,102,000 14,859,000 Depreciation and amortization (Note 1) .................. 6,259,000 5,908,000 5,286,000 General and administrative expenses (Notes 1 and 4) ...... 3,324,000 3,119,000 3,091,000 Mortgage and bank loan interest ........................... 9,086,000 9,831,000 8,908,000 Provisions for losses on investments (Note 1) ............ 500,000 -- -- ------------ ------------ ------------ Total expenses .......................................... 35,458,000 34,960,000 32,144,000 ------------ ------------ ------------ Income before minority interest, equity in income of partnerships and joint ventures and gains on sales of interests in real estate ................................. 5,027,000 4,196,000 5,010,000 Minority interest ....................................... (198,000) (275,000) (285,000) Equity in income of partnerships and joint ventures (Notes 1 and 2) .......................................... 4,337,000 6,258,000 6,381,000 Gains on sales of interests in real estate ............... 1,069,000 865,000 119,000 ------------ ------------ ------------ Net income ................................................ $ 10,235,000 $ 11,044,000 $ 11,225,000 ============ ============ ============ Net income per Share (Note 1) ........................... $ 1.18 $ 1.27 $ 1.29 ============ ============ ============ The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements. F-11
424B571st Page of 167TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 71st
PENNSYLVANIA REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY FOR THE THREE YEARS ENDED AUGUST 31, 1997 · Enlarge/Download Table Shares of beneficial Additional Distributions interest paid in in excess of $1 par capital net income --------------- ------------- ---------------- Balance, September 1, 1994 .............................. $8,670,000 $53,039,000 $ (4,961,000) Net income ............................................. -- -- 11,225,000 Shares issued upon exercise of options (Note 5) ...... 6,000 94,000 -- Distributions paid to shareholders ($1.88 per share) . -- -- (16,302,000) ---------- ----------- ------------- Balance, August 31, 1995 ................................. 8,676,000 53,133,000 (10,038,000) Net income ............................................. -- -- 11,044,000 Distributions paid to shareholders ($1.88 per share) . -- -- (16,310,000) ---------- ----------- ------------- Balance, August 31, 1996 ................................. 8,676,000 53,133,000 (15,304,000) Net income ............................................. -- -- 10,235,000 Shares issued upon exercise of options (Note 5) ...... 9,000 166,000 -- Issuance of compensatory stock options (Note 5) ...... -- 300,000 -- Distributions paid to shareholders ($1.88 per share) . -- -- (16,316,000) ---------- ----------- ------------- Balance, August 31, 1997 ................................. $8,685,000 $53,599,000 $ (21,385,000) ========== =========== ============= The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements. F-12
424B572nd Page of 167TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 72nd
PENNSYLVANIA REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS FOR THE YEARS ENDED AUGUST 31 · Enlarge/Download Table 1997 1996 1995 --------------- --------------- --------------- Cash Flows From Operating Activities Net income ...................................................... $10,235,000 $11,044,000 $11,225,000 Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: Minority interest in income of consolidated partnership ...... 198,000 275,000 285,000 Depreciation and amortization ................................. 6,259,000 5,908,000 5,286,000 Gains on sales of interests in real estate .................. (1,069,000) (865,000) (119,000) Provision for losses on investments ........................... 500,000 -- -- Issuance of compensatory stock options ........................ 300,000 -- -- Decrease in allowance for possible losses ..................... (710,000) (734,000) (460,000) Change in assets and liabilities: Rents and sundry receivables ................................. 18,000 (192,000) (18,000) Deferred costs, prepaid real estate taxes and expenses, net (10,000) (356,000) (837,000) Accrued pension and retirement benefits ..................... (116,000) (6,000) 130,000 Accrued expenses and other liabilities ........................ (310,000) (54,000) 1,042,000 Tenants' deposits and deferred rents ........................ (76,000) 70,000 138,000 ----------- ----------- ----------- Net cash provided by operating activities ........................ 15,219,000 15,090,000 16,672,000 ----------- ----------- ----------- Cash Flows From Investing Activities Investments in wholly owned real estate ........................ (3,901,000) (3,685,000) (38,058,000) Investments in partnerships and joint ventures .................. (2,326,000) (517,000) (983,000) Cash proceeds from sales of real estate investments ............ -- 5,163,000 -- Cash proceeds from sales of interests in partnerships ............ 2,069,000 -- -- Increase in advances to partnerships and joint ventures ......... (323,000) (380,000) (749,000) Cash distributions from partnerships and joint ventures in excess of (less than) equity in income ........................ 17,605,000 889,000 (127,000) Cash distributions to minority partners ........................ (200,000) (261,000) (165,000) Decrease in notes receivable .................................... 1,649,000 -- -- Deposits on agreement to purchase .............................. (5,336,000) -- -- Deferred acquisition costs ....................................... (1,488,000) (276,000) -- ----------- ----------- ----------- Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities ............ 7,749,000 933,000 (40,082,000) ----------- ----------- ----------- Cash Flows From Financing Activities Principal installments on mortgage notes payable ............... (1,305,000) (1,123,000) (821,000) Increase in mortgage notes payable .............................. -- 8,800,000 35,000,000 Prepayment of mortgage notes payable ........................... -- (1,749,000) -- Proceeds from bank loan payable ................................. -- -- 39,379,000 Decrease in bank loan payable .................................... (5,431,000) (5,005,000) (35,000,000) Decrease (increase) in deferred financing costs .................. 278,000 (704,000) -- Shares of beneficial interest issued ........................... 175,000 -- 100,000 Distributions paid to shareholders .............................. (16,316,000) (16,310,000) (16,302,000) ----------- ----------- ----------- Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities ............ (22,599,000) (16,091,000) 22,356,000 ----------- ----------- ----------- Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents ............ 369,000 (68,000) (1,054,000) Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year ..................... 1,030,000 1,098,000 2,152,000 ----------- ----------- ----------- Cash and cash equivalents, end of year ........................... $ 1,399,000 $ 1,030,000 $ 1,098,000 =========== =========== =========== Supplemental disclosure of non-cash investing activities: Net assets acquired ............................................. $ -- $ -- $ 3,590,000 Liabilities assumed (primarily bank loans payable) ............... -- -- (3,804,000) ----------- ----------- ----------- $ -- $ -- $ (214,000) =========== =========== =========== Accrual of acquisition costs .................................... $ 778,000 $ -- $ -- =========== =========== =========== The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements. F-13
424B573rd Page of 167TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 73rd
PENNSYLVANIA REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS YEARS ENDED AUGUST 31, 1997, 1996 AND 1995 1. Summary of significant accounting policies Nature of Operations Pennsylvania Real Estate Investment Trust (the "Company") is a self-administered equity real estate investment trust engaged, directly and through subsidiaries and joint ventures, in owning and managing income producing real estate, with an emphasis on shopping centers and apartment complexes. The Company primarily operates in the mid-Atlantic region from Pennsylvania to Virginia and in selected areas of Florida. Consolidation The consolidated financial statements of the Company include the accounts of thirteen wholly owned subsidiaries, two are Delaware corporations, one is a Nebraska corporation, one is a Virginia corporation, one is a Maryland corporation and eight are Florida corporations. One partnership in which the Company is a 65% general partner, and has control as provided in the partnership agreement, has been consolidated for financial statement presentation. The minority partner's interest is 35%. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. Partnership and joint venture investments In accordance with the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants' Statement of Position 78-9, "Accounting for Investments in Real Estate Ventures," the Company accounts for its investment in partnerships and joint ventures which it does not control using the equity method of accounting. These investments, which represent 25-to-70% non-controlling ownership interests, are recorded initially at the Trust's cost and subsequently adjusted for the Company's net equity in income and cash contributions and distributions. Statements of cash flows The Company considers all highly liquid short-term investments with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents. Cash paid for interest was $8,963,000, $9,962,000, and $8,619,000, for the years ended August 31, 1997, 1996 and 1995, respectively. Capitalization of costs It is the Company's policy to capitalize interest and real estate taxes related to construction in progress and to depreciate these costs over the life of the related assets in order to more properly match revenues and expenses. These items are capitalized for income tax purposes and amortized or depreciated in accordance with the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code. For fiscal years 1997, 1996 and 1995 the Company did not capitalize any interest or real estate taxes. The Company has capitalized as deferred costs certain expenditures related to the financing and leasing of certain properties. Capitalized loan fees are being amortized over the terms of the related loans and leasing commissions are being amortized over the term of the related leases. During 1997, the Company capitalized certain deposits associated with the planned future purchase of two regional malls. These deposits were applied to the respective properties upon consummation of the transaction described in Note 10. Depreciation The Company, for financial reporting purposes, depreciates its buildings, equipment and leasehold improvements over their estimated useful lives of 10 to 45 years, using the straight-line method of depreciation. For Federal income tax purposes, the Company currently uses the straight-line method of depreciation and the useful lives prescribed by the Internal Revenue Code. F-14
424B574th Page of 167TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 74th
PENNSYLVANIA REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (Continued) YEARS ENDED AUGUST 31, 1997, 1996 AND 1995 1. Summary of significant accounting policies -- (Continued) Allowance for possible losses On September 1, 1996, the Company adopted the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 121, "Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to be Disposed Of" ("SFAS No. 121"). SFAS No. 121 requires long-lived assets to be held and used by the Company to be reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. If the sum of the expected future cash flows (undiscounted and without interest charges) is less than the carrying amount of the asset, an impairment loss should be recognized. Measurement of an impairment loss for these assets should be based on the fair market value of the assets. Adoption of this statement had no impact on the Company's financial position or results of operations. During 1997, an impairment loss of approximately $500,000 was recorded following the expiration of an option to sell certain land parcels held by a partnership in which the Company holds an equity interest. Benefit plans The Company has provided pension benefits since 1970 for all employees, excluding the Chairman, for whom retirement benefits are provided in an employment contract. With regard to the Chairman's employment contract, no provision was required for fiscal years ended August 31, 1997, 1996 and 1995, respectively. Derivative Financial Instruments In managing interest rate exposure on certain floating rate debt, the Company at times enters into interest rate swap and cap agreements. When interest rates change, the differential to be paid or received is accrued as interest expense and is recognized over the life of the swap agreements. The costs of cap transactions are deferred and amortized over the contract period. The amortized costs of cap transactions and interest income and interest expense on swap transactions are included in mortgage and bank loan interest. Income taxes The Company has elected to qualify as a real estate investment trust under Sections 856-860 of the Internal Revenue Code and intends to remain so qualified. Accordingly, no provision has been made for Federal income taxes on income resulting from those sales of real estate investments which have or will be distributed to shareholders within the prescribed time limits. However, taxes are provided for those gains which are not anticipated to be distributed to shareholders. The Company is subject to a Federal excise tax computed on a calendar year. The excise tax equals 4% of the excess, if any, of 85% of the Company's ordinary income plus 95% of the Company's capital gain net income for the calendar year over cash distributions during the calendar year, as defined. The Company has in the past distributed a substantial portion of its taxable income in the subsequent fiscal year and may also follow this policy in the future. No provision for excise tax was made for fiscal years 1997, 1996 and 1995 as no tax was due. The tax status of distributions paid to shareholders was composed of the following for the calendar years ended December 31, 1996 and 1995. 1996 1995 -------- ------ Ordinary income ...... $1.72 $1.88 Capital gains ......... .16 -- ----- ----- $1.88 $1.88 ===== ===== F-15
424B575th Page of 167TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 75th
PENNSYLVANIA REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (Continued) YEARS ENDED AUGUST 31, 1997, 1996 AND 1995 1. Summary of significant accounting policies -- (Continued) The tax status of distributions paid to shareholders for the calendar year ending December 31, 1997 will be determined upon preparation of the Company's federal income tax return. Management expects such distributions to consist of ordinary income and capital gains. Net income per share Earnings per share are based on the weighted average number of shares outstanding which were 8,678,560 in 1997, 8,676,098 in 1996, and 8,670,810 in 1995. Use of Estimates The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amount of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Reclassifications Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform with the current year presentation. 2. Investments in partnerships and joint ventures The following presents summarized financial information for the Company's investments in 22 and 26 partnerships and joint ventures at August 31, 1997 and 1996, respectively, and the Company's equity in income for the years ended August 31, 1997, 1996 and 1995. · Enlarge/Download Table At August 31 ----------------------------------- 1997 1996 ---------------- ---------------- Assets Investments in Real Estate at Cost: Retail properties .................................... $120,660,000 $ 128,936,000 Multifamily properties .............................. 107,604,000 105,480,000 Industrial property ................................. 1,264,000 1,264,000 Land ................................................ 4,446,000 4,446,000 ------------ ------------- Total investments in real estate ..................... 233,974,000 240,126,000 Less accumulated depreciation ........................ 71,838,000 73,989,000 ------------ ------------- 162,136,000 166,137,000 Cash and cash equivalents .............................. 6,031,000 5,589,000 Other assets .......................................... 5,728,000 6,020,000 ------------ ------------- Total assets .......................................... 173,895,000 177,746,000 ------------ ------------- Liabilities and Partners' Equity Mortgage notes payable ................................. 162,097,000 133,578,000 Bank loans payable .................................... 8,770,000 9,124,000 Due to the Company .................................... 3,118,000 2,795,000 Other liabilities ....................................... 4,341,000 4,436,000 ------------ ------------- Total liabilities .................................... 178,326,000 149,933,000 ------------ ------------- Net equity (deficit) ................................. (4,431,000) 27,813,000 Partners' share .................................... (5,470,000) (10,818,000) ------------ ------------- Investments in partnerships and joint ventures ...... $ 1,039,000 $ 16,995,000 ============ ============= F-16
424B576th Page of 167TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 76th
PENNSYLVANIA REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (Continued) YEARS ENDED AUGUST 31, 1997, 1996 AND 1995 2. Investments in partnerships and joint ventures -- (Continued) · Enlarge/Download Table For the years ended August 31 1997 1996 1995 --------------- --------------- --------------- Gross revenues from real estate ..................... $ 52,446,000 $ 53,209,000 $ 52,339,000 ------------ ------------ ------------ Expenses: Property operating expenses ..................... 20,774,000 21,724,000 20,477,000 Mortgage and bank loan interest .................. 14,908,000 11,984,000 12,463,000 Depreciation and amortization .................. 6,978,000 6,833,000 6,502,000 ------------ ------------ ------------ Total expenses ................................. 42,660,000 40,541,000 39,442,000 ------------ ------------ ------------ Net income .......................................... 9,786,000 12,668,000 12,897,000 Partners' share ................................. (5,449,000) (6,410,000) (6,516,000) ------------ ------------ ------------ Equity in income of partnerships and joint ventures . $ 4,337,000 $ 6,258,000 $ 6,381,000 ============ ============ ============ Mortgage notes payable which are secured by the related properties are due in installments over various terms extending to the year 2013 with interest rates ranging from 6.6% to 10.4% with an average interest rate of 7.9%. Principal payments are due as follows: Fiscal year ending ------------------------------------------- 1998 .................................... $ 6,062,000 1999 .................................... 8,268,000 2000 .................................... 9,147,000 2001 .................................... 18,705,000 2002 .................................... 3,913,000 2003 and thereafter ..................... 116,002,000 ------------ $162,097,000 ============ The liability under each mortgage note is limited to the particular property except for two loans in the amount of $7,234,000 which are guaranteed by the partners of the respective partnerships, including the Company. In addition, one bank loan in the amount of $2,911,000 has been guaranteed by the partners of the partnership including the Company. The Company's investments in certain partnerships and joint ventures reflect cash distributions in excess of the Company's net investments totaling $5,999,000 and $5,876,000 at August 31, 1997 and 1996, respectively. The Company is generally entitled to a priority return on these investments. The Company has a 50% partnership interest in Lehigh Valley Mall Associates which is included in the amounts above. Summarized financial information for this investment which is accounted for by the equity method follows: · Enlarge/Download Table For the years ended -------------------------------------------- 8/31/97 8/31/96 8/31/95 ------------- ------------- ------------ Total assets ................................. $24,645,000 $23,552,000 $20,858,000 Mortgages payable and construction loan ...... 53,406,000 22,489,000 22,227,000 Revenues .................................... 14,840,000 13,823,000 13,667,000 Property operating expenses .................. 4,657,000 4,198,000 3,412,000 Interest expense .............................. 4,638,000 1,998,000 2,040,000 Net income .................................... 4,660,000 6,915,000 7,548,000 Equity in income of partnership ............... 2,330,000 3,458,000 3,774,000 F-17
424B577th Page of 167TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 77th
PENNSYLVANIA REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (Continued) YEARS ENDED AUGUST 31, 1997, 1996 AND 1995 3. Mortgage notes and bank loans payable Mortgage notes payable which are secured by the related properties are due in installments over various terms extending to the year 2008 with interest at rates ranging from 5.90% to 9.50% with an average interest rate of 7.94%. Principal payments are due as follows: Fiscal year ending ------------------------------------------- 1998 .................................... $ 1,408,000 1999 .................................... 1,504,000 2000 .................................... 33,969,000 2001 .................................... 1,129,000 2002 .................................... 1,217,000 2003 and thereafter ..................... 44,301,000 ----------- $83,528,000 =========== In August 1996, the Company modified its existing $75.0 million unsecured revolving line of credit to a $20.0 million revolving line of credit and a $55.0 million unsecured term loan. The term loan is divided into two tranches, a $30.0 million ten year term and a $25.0 million seven year term. The Company has the option of selecting fixed or floating rates on the term loan. As of August 31, 1997, $13.0 million of the unsecured revolving line of credit was outstanding ($7.3 million directly by the Trust and $5.7 million through partnerships and joint ventures) and $26.7 million of the term loan ($20.0 million for ten years due August 2006 and $7 million for seven years due August 2003). The line of credit and term loans bear interest at LIBOR plus 185 basis points. Under the credit facility, the Company must maintain minimum net worth and operating income levels as defined in the loan documents. The weighted average interest rates based on amounts borrowed were 7.43%, 7.51% and 7.98% for fiscal years ended August 31, 1997, 1996 and 1995, respectively. Subsequent to year end, the Company entered into a new $150 million credit facility (see Note 10). During 1995, the Company purchased interest rate protection at a cost of $250,000 on $15,000,000 of outstanding debt limiting the 30-day LIBOR rate to 7.5% for three years. The Company also limited its exposure to increases in LIBOR on $20,000,000 of its floating rate debt by entering into a swap agreement which fixes a rate of 6.12% versus 30-day LIBOR through June 2001. The Company is exposed to credit loss in the event of non-performance by counterparties to the interest rate protection agreements; however, the Company does not anticipate non-performance by the counterparties. At August 31, 1997, the Company was in compliance with all debt covenants. The carrying values of the mortgage notes and bank loans payable at August 31, 1997 and 1996 were approximately equal to their respective fair values, as determined by using year-end interest rates and market conditions. At August 31, 1997, the fair values of the interest rate protection and swap agreements referred to above were approximately $0 and $85,000, respectively. 4. Benefit Plans During 1995 the Company adopted a 401(k) Plan (the "Plan") in which substantially all of the officers and employees are eligible to participate. The Plan permits eligible participants, as defined in the Plan agreement, to defer up to 15% of their compensation, and the Trust, at its discretion, may match a percentage of the employees' contributions. The employees' contributions are fully vested and contributions from the Trust vest in accordance with an employee's years of service as defined in the plan agreement. The Company's contributions to the Plan for the years ended August 31, 1997, 1996 and 1995 were $41,000, $39,000 and $1,000, respectively. F-18
424B578th Page of 167TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 78th
PENNSYLVANIA REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (Continued) YEARS ENDED AUGUST 31, 1997, 1996 AND 1995 4. Benefit Plans -- (Continued) During 1995, the Company also adopted a Supplemental Retirement Plan (the "Supplemental Plan") covering certain senior management employees. The Supplemental Plan provides eligible employees through normal retirement date, as defined in the plan agreement, a benefit amount similar to that which would have been received under the provisions of a pension plan which was terminated in 1994. The Company has recorded $92,000, $160,000 and $168,000 of contributions due under the provisions of this plan for the years ended August 31, 1997, 1996 and 1995, respectively, 5. Stock Option Plans In December 1990, the shareholders approved an incentive stock option plan for key employees and a stock option plan for non-employee trustees, covering 200,000 and 100,000 shares of beneficial interest, respectively. Under the terms of the plan, the purchase price of shares subject to each option granted will be at least equal to the fair market value of the shares on the date of grant. Options under the incentive stock option plan may be exercised as determined by the Company, but in no event later than 10 years from the date of grant. In December 1993, the Board of Trustees amended the incentive stock option plan for key employees, to increase the number of shares subject to option to 400,000 shares, to change the name of the plan to "1990 Incentive and Non Qualifying Stock Option Plan" and to expand some provisions of the plan. The stock option plan for non-employee trustees provides for annual grants of 1,000 options (becoming exercisable in four equal installments). The options expire 10 years after the date of grant. In December 1993, the Board of Trustees adopted a non-qualifying stock option plan covering 100,000 shares. The Company granted options on February 1, 1994 having a term of 10 years and subject to the other terms and conditions set forth in the plan. All 100,000 shares are outstanding at August 31, 1997. Changes in options outstanding are as follows: Plan For Employees Non-Employee Plan Trustees ----------- ------------- Options outstanding at 8/31/95 ...... 244,625 35,250 Options granted ..................... 50,500 6,000 Options exercised .................. 0 0 ------- ------ Options outstanding at 8/31/96 ...... 295,125 41,250 Options granted ..................... 45,000 6,000 Options exercised .................. 0 (9,000) ------- ------ Options outstanding at 8/31/97 ...... 340,125 38,250 ------- ------ As of August 31, 1997, options for 377,500 shares had been granted pursuant to the incentive stock option plan of which 340,125 remain outstanding at $16.00 to $24.625 per share and options for 48,000 shares had been granted, pursuant to the stock option plan for non-employee trustees of which 38,250 shares remain outstanding at $15.75 to $25.375 per share. At August 31, 1997, options for 223,286 shares of beneficial interest with an aggregate purchase price of $4,853,000 (average of $21.73 per share) were exercisable. During the fourth quarter of 1997, the Board of Trustees extended the exercise dates for 62,500 options previously granted to an officer of the Company and two retiring trustees. As a result, the Company recorded compensation expense of $300,000 relating to this change in terms. During 1997, the Company adopted an accounting standard, "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation" ("SFAS No. 123"). SFAS No 123 encourages a fair value method of accounting for employee stock options and similar equity instruments. The statement also allows an entity to continue to account for stock-based compensation using the intrinsic value method in APB Opinion No. 25. As provided for in the statement, the F-19
424B579th Page of 167TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 79th
PENNSYLVANIA REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (Continued) YEARS ENDED AUGUST 31, 1997, 1996 AND 1995 5. Stock Option Plans -- (Continued) Company elected to continue the intrinsic value method of expense recognition. If compensation cost for these plans had been determined using the fair value method prescribed by SFAS No. 123, the Company's net income would have reflected the pro forma amounts indicated below. 1997 1996 ------------- ------------ Net income ............... $10,212,000 $11,033,000 Net income per share ...... $ 1.18 $ 1.27 The pro forma effect on the results may not be representative of the impact in future years because the fair value method was not applied to options granted before 1996. The fair value of each option was estimated on the grant date using the Black-Scholes option pricing model and the assumptions presented below. 1997 1996 ---------- ---------- Expected life in years ...... 5 5 Risk-free interest rate ...... 6.10% 5.58% Volatility .................. 17.31% 18.12% Dividend yield ............... 7.28% 8.90% The weighted average fair value of options granted was $2.05 per option in 1997 and $1.29 per option in 1996. In March 1997, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement No. 128, "Earnings per Share". The new statement is effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 1997. When adopted, the statement will require implementing a new definition of earnings per share including restatement of prior year amounts. Management has determined there will be no significant impact upon adoption of the statement. 6. Operating Leases The Company's multifamily properties are typically leased to residents under operating leases for a period of one year. The Company's shopping centers are leased to tenants under operating leases with expiration dates extending to the year 2008. Future minimum rentals under non-cancelable operating leases at August 31, 1997 are as follows: 1998 ........................... $ 4,911,000 1999 ........................... 4,574,000 2000 ........................... 4,340,000 2001 ........................... 4,005,000 2002 ........................... 3,438,000 Thereafter ..................... 12,189,000 ----------- $33,457,000 =========== 7. Commitments and Contingencies During 1995 certain environmental matters arose at certain properties in which the Company has an interest. The Company retained environmental consultants in order to investigate these matters. At one property, in which the Trust has a 50% ownership interest, groundwater contamination exists which the Trust alleges was caused by the former tenant. Estimates to remediate this property, which are subject to the length of monitoring and the extent of remediation required, range in total from $100,000 to $1,000,000. In addition, above normal radon levels have been detected at two wholly owned properties. The estimated remaining cost to remediate these properties is approximately $115,000, which costs were received as a credit from the sellers as part of the initial acquisitions. F-20
424B580th Page of 167TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 80th
PENNSYLVANIA REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST NOTES