SEC Info  
    Home      Search      My Interests      Help      Sign In      Please Sign In

Itract Inc – ‘S-4’ on 7/3/00

On:  Monday, 7/3/00, at 3:31pm ET   ·   Accession #:  950170-0-1115   ·   File #:  333-40762

Previous ‘S-4’:  None   ·   Next & Latest:  ‘S-4/A’ on 1/24/01

Find Words in Filings emoji
 
  in    Show  and   Hints

  As Of                Filer                Filing    For·On·As Docs:Size              Issuer               Agent

 7/03/00  Itract Inc                        S-4                    7:826K                                   Donnelley Fin’l/Miami/FA

Registration of Securities Issued in a Business-Combination Transaction   —   Form S-4
Filing Table of Contents

Document/Exhibit                   Description                      Pages   Size 

 1: S-4         Registration of Securities Issued in a               293   1.13M 
                          Business-Combination Transaction                       
 2: EX-4.1      Instrument Defining the Rights of Security Holders    14     56K 
 3: EX-10.1     Material Contract                                     14     52K 
 4: EX-23.4     Consent of Experts or Counsel                          1      7K 
 5: EX-23.5     Consent of Experts or Counsel                          1      6K 
 6: EX-23.6     Consent of Experts or Counsel                          1      7K 
 7: EX-23.7     Consent of Experts or Counsel                          1      8K 


S-4   —   Registration of Securities Issued in a Business-Combination Transaction
Document Table of Contents

Page (sequential) | (alphabetic) Top
 
11st Page   -   Filing Submission
"Itract, Inc
2Calculation of Registration Fee
10Questions and Answers About the Transaction
"The Transaction
12Summary
"The Companies
"The Mergers
13The Sale of Margo's Existing Subsidiaries
"What Holders of Margo Stock Will Receive in the Reincorporation Merger
"Reasons for the itract Merger
"Recommendations to Margo Shareholders
"Votes Required for Approval of Merger with Holdings and the Sale of the Businesses
"Opinions of Financial Advisors
14Interests of Persons Involved in the Merger
"Board of Directors and Management of Holdings following the Merger with itract
"Dissenters' Rights of Appraisal
15Federal and Puerto Rico Income Tax Consequences
"Exchange of Stock Certificates
"Listing on the NASDAQ SmallCap Market
"Summary Historical and Pro Forma Financial Information
16Comparative Per Share Information
18Risk Factors
"Risks Associated with itract's Business
"Itract Has a History of Losses and an Expectation of Continuing Losses
19Intense Competition Exists in Internet-Based Direct Marketing Services and itract Expects Competition to Continue to Intensify
"Itract's Inability to Comply with Federal Law Relating to the Transmission of Unsolicited Faxes May Harm itract's Business
"Itract's Failure to Manage its Planned Rapid Growth Could Cause its Business to Suffer
"Delays in Upgrading of itract's Web site and Offering New Services May Harm itract's Business
20Itract's Faxing Capabilities are Dependent on Third Party Licenses and Relationships; itract May Need to License Additional Technologies to Succeed in its Business
"Unknown Software Defects Could Disrupt itract's Services
"Itract's Quarterly Operating Results May Fluctuate and Fall below Market Expectations Which Could Negatively Affect The Value of Holdings' Common Stock Following the itract Merger
21Itract May Not Be Able to Obtain Additional Capital to Fund its Operations When Needed
"Itract's Business Will Suffer If it Does Not Attract and Retain Additional Highly Skilled Personnel
"Need to Attract and Retain Executive Personnel
22Entities Affiliated With itract Will Have Significant Control of Holdings after the itract Merger; Conflicts of Interest
"Itract May Face Claims for Activities of its Customers Which Could Harm itract's Business
"Itract May Lose Customers and its Reputation May Suffer Because of Spam; Government Regulation of Email Transmissions
23Itract Depends on Third-party Vendors for the Delivery of Postal Mail
"Risks Associated with itract's Technology
"If itract is Unable to Adequately Protect its Intellectual Property, its Business Will Suffer
"Itract's Proprietary Technology May Be Subject to Infringement Claims Which Could Harm its Business
24Failure to Keep Pace with Rapidly Changing Technology and Market Conditions Could Affect itract's Competitiveness
"If itract Encounters System Failure, it May Not Be Able to Provide Adequate Service and its Business and Reputation Could Be Damaged
25Service Interruptions from itract's Third Party Internet and Telecommunications Providers Could Harm its Business
"Risks Associated with the Internet
"Itract's Business Will Suffer If the Internet Does Not Achieve Continuing, Widespread Acceptance as a Marketing and Communications Medium
"Itract Will Not Be Able to Increase its Business Unless Consumers and Businesses Increase Their Use of the Internet and the Internet Is Able to Support the Demands of this Growth
"Increased Governmental Regulation and Legal Uncertainties May Impair the Growth of the Internet and Decrease Demand for itract's Services or Increase itract's Cost of Doing Business
26Changes in Telecommunications Regulations Could Cause Reduced Demand for itract's Services
"Other risks relating to your investment in Margo and, following the reincorporation merger, in Holdings
"Margo's stock price has been, and is likely to continue to be, extremely volatile
"Your investment in Holdings stock may become illiquid and you may lose your entire investment
27Penny stock regulations may affect your ability to sell Holdings' securities
"Anti-takeover provisions in Holdings' charter could negatively impact the trading price of its securities
"Following the Mergers, Holdings will be Required to Indemnify the Former Officers and Directors of Margo and its Affiliates
"No Dividends will be Paid in the Near Future
28Forward-Looking Statements
"The Margo Annual Meeting
"Purpose, Time and Place
"Record Date; Voting Power
29Votes Required
"Voting of Proxies
"Revocability of Proxies
30Solicitation of Proxies
"Executive Compensation
32Share Ownership of Management and Certain Shareholders
33Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance
35Proposed Reincorporation Merger and Merger With Itract
"General
"Background of the Transaction
36Recommendations of Margo's Board of Directors and Reasons for the Transactions
37Opinion of Financial Advisor Regarding Merger with itract
39Terms of the Merger Agreement with Holdings
43Federal Income Tax Consequences
"Margo
44Holdings
45Puerto Rico Tax Consequences
46Terms of the Merger Agreement with itract
51Indemnification and Insurance
52Material Federal Income Tax Consequences
56Directors and Principal Officers of Holdings after the Merger
57Interests of Certain Persons in the Merger
58Accounting Treatment
"Restriction on Resales by Affiliates
"Information About Holdings
59Description of Holdings' Securities
"Common Stock
"Preferred Stock
60Comparative Rights of Shareholders of Margo and Holdings
63Comparative Rights of Members of Itract and Shareholders of Holdings
64ITract
65Selected Financial Data
"Selected Financial Data of Margo
69Information About itract
"Business Overview
"Industry Overview
70Itract's Business
72Revenue Sources
"Itract Sales and Marketing
74Technology
75Competition
"Intellectual Property Rights
76Government Regulation
77Employees and Facilities
"Legal Proceedings
"Certain Relationships and Related Transactions
78Employment Agreements
"Financial Statements
"Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations of Itract
79Overview
"Historical Results of Operations
80Liquidity and Capital Resources
81Web site Development Costs
"Recently Issued Accounting Standards
82Year 2000 Compliance
"Information About Margo
"Business
"Principal Operations
86Income Taxes
"Property
88Market for Common Equity and Related Shareholder Matters
"Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations of Margo
"Results of Operations for Each of the Years Ended December 31, 1999, 1998 and 1997
91Write Down of Note Receivable
"Results of Operations for the Quarters Ended March 31, 2000 and 1999
92Financial Condition
94Proposed Sale of Margo's Businesses
101Election of Directors to Serve until Consummation of the Merger
"Information Concerning Existing Margo Directors
102Lease and Option to Purchase Main Nursery Farm
103Legal Matters
"Experts
"Where You Can Find More Information
156Stock Purchase Agreement
163Closing
289Item 20. Indemnification of Directors and Officers
290Item 21. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
291Item 22. Undertakings
S-41st Page of 293TOCTopPreviousNextBottomJust 1st
 

As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 3, 2000 Registration No. 33-____________ ================================================================================ SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549 -------------- FORM S-4 REGISTRATION STATEMENT UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933 -------------- iTract, Inc. (Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter) -------------- [Download Table] Delaware 7310 66-0584851 (State or other jurisdiction (Primary Standard Industrial (I.R.S. Employer of incorporation or organization) Classification Code Number) Identification No.) Highway 690, Kilometer 5.8 Vega Alta, Puerto Rico 00692 (787) 883-2570 (Address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of Registrant's principal executive offices) -------------- Michael J. Spector Chief Executive Officer iTract, Inc. P.O. Box 706 Dorado, Puerto Rico 00646 (787) 883-2570 (Name, address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of agent for service) -------------- Copies to: Ignacio Alvarez, Esq. Alfred G. Smith, Esq. Pietrantoni Mendez & Alvarez LLP Shutts & Bowen LLP Suite 1901, Banco Popular Center 1500 Miami Center 209 Munoz Rivera Avenue 201 South Biscayne Boulevard San Juan, Puerto Rico 00918 Miami, Florida 33131 (787) 274-4911 (305) 379-9147 -------------- Approximate date of commencement of proposed sale to public: As soon as practicable after the Registration Statement becomes effective and all other conditions under the merger agreements (described in the Proxy Statement/Prospectus herein) are satisfied or waived. If the securities being registered on this form are being offered in connection with the formation of a holding company and there is compliance with General Institution G, check the following box. [ ] If this form is filed to register additional securities for an offering pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering. [ ] ______________ If this form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(d) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering. [ ] ________________________ --------------
S-42nd Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 2nd
CALCULATION OF REGISTRATION FEE [Enlarge/Download Table] =================================================================================================================================== Title of each class of securities Amount to be Proposed maximum offering Proposed maximum Amount of to be registered registered price per share aggregate offering price registration fee ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Common Stock, par value $0.001 per share 2,009,822(1) $12(2) $24,117,864(2) $6,368 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Common Stock, par value $0.001 per share 12,680,057(3) $0(4) $0(4) $0 =================================================================================================================================== (1) Represents the maximum number of shares of common stock of iTract, Inc. (the "Registrant") to be issued in exchange for the common stock of Margo Caribe, Inc. (2) Estimated solely for the purpose of calculating the registration fee pursuant to Rule 457(f)(1) on the basis of the last sales price per share of the common stock of Margo Caribe, Inc. on June 28, 2000 reported by the Nasdaq SmallCap Market. (3) Represents the maximum number of shares of common stock of the Registrant to be issued in exchange for the membership units of itract, LLC. (4) Estimated solely for the purpose of calculating the registration fee pursuant to Rule 457(f)(2). Pursuant to such rule, with respect to the shares of Registrant's common stock being exchanged for membership units of itract, LLC, no offering price is reflected since itract, LLC has an accumulated capital deficit and its membership units have no principal amount, par value or stated value. The Registrant hereby amends this Registration Statement on such date or dates as may be necessary to delay its effective date until the Registrant shall file a further amendment which specifically states that this Registration Statement shall thereafter become effective in accordance with Section 8(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 or until the Registration Statement shall become effective on such date as the Commission, acting pursuant to said Section 8(a), may determine. ================================================================================
S-43rd Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 3rd
[LOGO] MARGO CARIBE, INC. MERGER PROPOSAL--YOUR VOTE IS VERY IMPORTANT The board of directors of Margo Caribe, Inc. has approved transactions that will result in: o the sale of Margo's existing nursery and other subsidiaries; o the merger of Margo with and into a newly formed Delaware corporation named "iTract, Inc." that will be headquartered in New York, New York; and o the merger of a wholly-owned subsidiary of iTract, Inc. with and into itract, LLC, a privately held early-stage Internet based company organized to build a system designed to allow its users to develop and launch direct marketing campaigns using e-mail, fax and postal mail simultaneously from a user's personal computer. If both mergers are completed, Margo's shareholders will receive one share of iTract, Inc. common stock for each share of Margo common stock. iTract, Inc. will issue 12,680,057 shares of common stock to members of itract, LLC as a result of the itract, LLC merger. Upon completion of both mergers, on a fully diluted basis, Margo's shareholders will own 13.2% of iTract, Inc. and itract, LLC members will own 86.8% of iTract, Inc. and itract, LLC will be a wholly-owned subsidiary of iTract, Inc. We are asking the Margo shareholders to approve the merger with iTract, Inc. and the sale of Margo's existing nursery and other subsidiaries. In addition, Margo is asking its shareholders to vote on the election of directors. Margo's annual meeting will be held: ______________, 2000 10:00 a.m. The Bankers Club of Puerto Rico Banco Popular Center 209 Munoz Rivera Avenue San Juan, Puerto Rico We cannot complete the transactions unless the shareholders of Margo approve and adopt the merger agreement with iTract, Inc. and the sale of Margo's existing nursery and other subsidiaries . Michael J. Spector, the Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and President of Margo, and Margaret D. Spector, the Secretary of Margo, who hold approximately 65.7% of the outstanding Margo common stock, have agreed to vote all of their shares of Margo common stock in favor of the proposed transactions. We believe the proposed transactions will offer us significant opportunities to create shareholder value. MICHAEL J. SPECTOR Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and President Margo Caribe, Inc. Consider the risks described on pages 9 through 18 of this document. Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state securities commission has approved or disapproved the securities to be issued under this document or determined if this document is truthful or complete. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense. This proxy statement/prospectus is dated _________, 2000, and is first being mailed to the shareholders of Margo on or about ________, 2000.
S-44th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 4th
Margo has not authorized anyone to give any information or make any representation about the proposed transactions, iTract, Inc., itract, LLC or Margo that differs from, or adds to, the information in this proxy statement/prospectus or in Margo's documents that are publicly filed with the SEC. Therefore, if anyone does give you different or additional information, you should not rely on it. If you are in a jurisdiction where it is unlawful to offer to exchange or sell, or to ask for offers to exchange or buy, the securities offered by this proxy statement/prospectus or to ask for proxies, or if you are a person to whom it is unlawful to direct such activities, then the offer presented by this proxy statement/prospectus does not extend to you. The information contained in this proxy statement/prospectus speaks only as of its date unless the information specifically indicates that another date applies. Certain information in this proxy statement/prospectus about itract, LLC has been supplied by itract, LLC. itract, LLC is a privately held company and its securities are not registered under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. This proxy statement/prospectus is a prospectus with respect to the issuance of iTract, Inc. common stock to the holders of Margo common stock and itract, LLC membership units. However, this proxy statement/prospectus is a proxy statement only with respect to Margo. USE OF DEFINED TERMS For purposes of clarity whenever the term "itract" is used in this proxy statement/prospectus it refers only to itract, LLC, an early-stage Internet based company. Also, whenever the term "Holdings" is used in this proxy statement/prospectus, it refers to iTract, Inc., the newly-formed Delaware corporation that, after consummation of the transactions described herein, will be a holding company with itract as its sole subsidiary.
S-45th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 5th
MARGO CARIBE, INC. ------------------------------------ NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS To Be Held on ________, 2000 ------------------------------------ To the Shareholders of Margo Caribe, Inc.: Margo Caribe, Inc., a Puerto Rico corporation ("Margo"), will hold its annual meeting of shareholders at The Bankers Club of Puerto Rico, Banco Popular Center, 209 Munoz Rivera Avenue, San Juan, Puerto Rico, on _________, at 10:00 a.m., local time, to vote on: 1. Approval of the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of June 21, 2000, by and between Margo and iTract, Inc., a newly-formed Delaware corporation. 2. Approval of the Stock Purchase Agreement, dated as of June 30, 2000, by and between Margo and Empresas Margo, Inc., providing for the sale of Margo's existing nursery and other subsidiaries. 3. Reelection of the existing five directors to the board of Margo to serve until consummation of the merger of Margo with iTract, Inc. and, if the merger is not consummated, until their successors are duly elected. 4. Any other matters that properly come before the meeting of Margo's shareholders, or any adjournments or postponements of the Margo meeting. Record holders of Margo common stock at the close of business on ________, 2000, will receive notice of and may vote at the meeting, including any adjournments or postponements. A list of these shareholders will be available for inspection for ten days before the meeting at Margo's offices at Road 690, Kilometer 5.8, Vega Alta, Puerto Rico 00692. The approval and adoption of the merger agreement with Holdings and the stock purchase agreement with Empresas Margo, Inc. will require the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the shares of Margo common stock outstanding on the record date. Election of directors will require the affirmative vote of a plurality of the votes cast at the annual meeting. Margaret D. Spector Secretary _________, 2000 Your vote is important. Please mark, sign, date and return your proxy promptly, whether or not you plan to attend our annual meeting. Our board of directors unanimously recommends that you vote FOR approval of the matters to be voted on at our annual meeting.
S-46th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 6th
TABLE OF CONTENTS [Enlarge/Download Table] Page QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE TRANSACTION.......................................................................1 SUMMARY...........................................................................................................3 The Companies.................................................................................................3 The Mergers...................................................................................................3 The Sale of Margo's Existing Subsidiaries.....................................................................4 What Holders of Margo Stock Will Receive in the Reincorporation Merger........................................4 Reasons for the itract Merger.................................................................................4 Recommendations to Margo Shareholders.........................................................................4 Votes Required for Approval of Merger with Holdings and the Sale of the Businesses............................4 Opinions of Financial Advisors................................................................................4 Interests of Persons Involved in the Merger...................................................................5 Board of Directors and Management of Holdings following the Merger with itract................................5 Dissenters' Rights of Appraisal...............................................................................5 Regulatory....................................................................................................5 Federal and Puerto Rico Income Tax Consequences...............................................................6 Exchange of Stock Certificates................................................................................6 Listing on the NASDAQ SmallCap Market.........................................................................6 SUMMARY HISTORICAL AND PRO FORMA FINANCIAL INFORMATION............................................................6 COMPARATIVE PER SHARE INFORMATION.................................................................................7 RISK FACTORS......................................................................................................9 Risks Associated with itract's Business.......................................................................9 itract Has a History of Losses and an Expectation of Continuing Losses...................................9 itract's Business Will Suffer If the Market for Outsourced Direct Marketing Services in General, and Email and Fax Marketing Services in Particular, Fails to Grow..............................10 Intense Competition Exists in Internet-Based Direct Marketing Services and itract Expects Competition to Continue to Intensify...........................................................10 itract's Inability to Comply with Federal Law Relating to the Transmission of Unsolicited Faxes May Harm itract's Business...............................................................10 itract's Failure to Manage its Planned Rapid Growth Could Cause its Business to Suffer..................10 Delays in Upgrading of itract's Web site and Offering New Services May Harm itract's Business..............................................................................10 itract's Faxing Capabilities are Dependent on Third Party Licenses and Relationships; itract May Need to License Additional Technologies to Succeed in its Business.........................11 Unknown Software Defects Could Disrupt itract's Services................................................11 itract's Quarterly Operating Results May Fluctuate and Fall below Market Expectations Which Could Negatively Affect The Value of Holdings' Common Stock Following the itract Merger..............11 itract May Not Be Able to Obtain Additional Capital to Fund its Operations When Needed..................12 itract's Business Will Suffer If it Does Not Attract and Retain Additional Highly Skilled Personnel.....12 Need to Attract and Retain Executive Personnel..........................................................12 itract May Not Be Able to Successfully Operate its Business If itract's Newly Formed Management Team Does Not Work Effectively Together.............................................13 Entities Affiliated With itract Will Have Significant Control of Holdings after the itract Merger; Conflicts of Interest..........................................................................13 itract May Face Claims for Activities of its Customers Which Could Harm itract's Business...............13 itract May Lose Customers and its Reputation May Suffer Because of Spam; Government Regulation of Email Transmissions..............................................................13 -i-
S-47th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 7th
itract Expects to Engage in Future Acquisitions That Could Entail Risks.................................14 itract Depends on Third-party Vendors for the Delivery of Postal Mail...................................14 Risks Associated with itract's Technology....................................................................14 If itract is Unable to Adequately Protect its Intellectual Property, its Business Will Suffer...........14 itract's Proprietary Technology May Be Subject to Infringement Claims Which Could Harm its Business...................................................................................14 If itract Fails to Upgrade its Systems and Infrastructure to Expand its Business and to Accommodate Increases in Email and Fax Transmissions, itract May Experience Slower Response Times or System Failures.............................................................................15 Failure to Keep Pace with Rapidly Changing Technology and Market Conditions Could Affect itract's Competitiveness.......................................................................15 If itract Encounters System Failure, it May Not Be Able to Provide Adequate Service and its Business and Reputation Could Be Damaged.......................................................15 Service Interruptions from itract's Third Party Internet and Telecommunications Providers Could Harm its Business........................................................................16 Risks Associated with the Internet...........................................................................16 itract's Business Will Suffer If the Internet Does Not Achieve Continuing, Widespread Acceptance as a Marketing and Communications Medium.......................................................16 itract Will Not Be Able to Increase its Business Unless Consumers and Businesses Increase Their Use of the Internet and the Internet Is Able to Support the Demands of this Growth.......16 Increased Governmental Regulation and Legal Uncertainties May Impair the Growth of the Internet and Decrease Demand for itract's Services or Increase itract's Cost of Doing Business..........16 Changes in Telecommunications Regulations Could Cause Reduced Demand for itract's Services..............17 Other risks relating to your investment in Margo and, following the reincorporation merger, in Holdings......17 Margo's stock price has been, and is likely to continue to be, extremely volatile.......................17 Your investment in Holdings stock may become illiquid and you may lose your entire investment...........17 Penny stock regulations may affect your ability to sell Holdings' securities............................18 Anti-takeover provisions in Holdings' charter could negatively impact the trading price of its securities.....................................................................................18 Following the Mergers, Holdings will be Required to Indemnify the Former Officers and Directors of Margo and its Affiliates....................................................................18 No Dividends will be Paid in the Near Future............................................................18 FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS.......................................................................................19 THE MARGO ANNUAL MEETING.........................................................................................19 Purpose, Time and Place......................................................................................19 Record Date; Voting Power....................................................................................19 Votes Required...............................................................................................20 Voting of Proxies............................................................................................20 Revocability of Proxies......................................................................................20 Solicitation of Proxies......................................................................................21 Executive Compensation.......................................................................................21 Share Ownership of Management and Certain Shareholders.......................................................23 Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance......................................................24 PROPOSED REINCORPORATION MERGER AND MERGER WITH ITRACT...........................................................26 General......................................................................................................26 Background of the Transaction................................................................................26 Recommendations of Margo's Board of Directors and Reasons for the Transactions...............................27 Opinion of Financial Advisor Regarding Merger with itract....................................................28 Terms of the Merger Agreement with Holdings..................................................................30 Federal Income Tax Consequences..............................................................................34 Puerto Rico Tax Consequences.................................................................................36 Terms of the Merger Agreement with itract....................................................................37 Material Federal Income Tax Consequences.....................................................................43 -ii-
S-48th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 8th
Directors and Principal Officers of Holdings after the Merger................................................47 Interests of Certain Persons in the Merger...................................................................48 Indemnification and Insurance................................................................................49 Accounting Treatment.........................................................................................49 Restriction on Resales by Affiliates.........................................................................49 INFORMATION ABOUT HOLDINGS.......................................................................................49 DESCRIPTION OF HOLDINGS' SECURITIES..............................................................................50 COMPARATIVE RIGHTS OF SHAREHOLDERS OF MARGO AND HOLDINGS.........................................................51 COMPARATIVE RIGHTS OF MEMBERS OF ITRACT AND SHAREHOLDERS OF HOLDINGS.............................................54 SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA..........................................................................................56 Selected Financial Data of Margo.............................................................................56 INFORMATION ABOUT ITRACT.........................................................................................60 Business Overview............................................................................................60 Industry Overview............................................................................................60 Itract's Business............................................................................................61 Revenue Sources..............................................................................................63 Itract Sales and Marketing ..................................................................................63 Technology...................................................................................................65 Competition..................................................................................................66 Intellectual Property Rights.................................................................................66 Government Regulation........................................................................................67 Employees and Facilities.....................................................................................68 Legal Proceedings............................................................................................68 Certain Relationships and Related Transactions ..............................................................68 Executive Compensation.......................................................................................69 Employment Agreements........................................................................................69 Financial Statements.........................................................................................69 MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS OF ITRACT......................................................69 Overview.....................................................................................................70 Historical Results of Operations.............................................................................70 Liquidity and Capital Resources..............................................................................71 Web site Development Costs...................................................................................72 Recently Issued Accounting Standards.........................................................................72 Year 2000 Compliance.........................................................................................73 INFORMATION ABOUT MARGO..........................................................................................73 Business.....................................................................................................73 Principal Operations.........................................................................................73 Income Taxes.................................................................................................77 Property.....................................................................................................77 Legal Proceedings............................................................................................78 Market for Common Equity and Related Shareholder Matters.....................................................79 Financial Statements.........................................................................................79 MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS OF MARGO...........................................................................79 Results of Operations for Each of the Years Ended December 31, 1999, 1998 and 1997...........................79 -iii-
S-49th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 9th
Results of Operations for the Quarters Ended March 31, 2000 and 1999.........................................82 Financial Condition..........................................................................................83 PROPOSED SALE OF MARGO'S BUSINESSES..............................................................................85 ELECTION OF DIRECTORS TO SERVE UNTIL CONSUMMATION OF THE MERGER..................................................92 Information Concerning Existing Margo Directors..............................................................92 Certain Relationships and Related Transactions...............................................................93 LEGAL MATTERS....................................................................................................94 EXPERTS..........................................................................................................94 WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION..............................................................................94 APPENDICES APPENDIX A - Reincorporation Merger Agreement APPENDIX B - itract Merger Agreement APPENDIX C - Stock Purchase Agreement APPENDIX D - Opinion of Schwartz Heslin Group, Inc. APPENDIX E - Opinion of San Juan Holdings, Inc. APPENDIX F - Section 10.12 of the Puerto Rico General Corporations Law - Appraisal Rights APPENDIX G - Certificate of Incorporation of iTract, Inc. APPENDIX H - Bylaws of iTract, Inc. APPENDIX I - Margo Financial Statements for the year ended December 31, 1999 APPENDIX J - Margo Financial Statements for the three months ended March 31, 2000 APPENDIX K - itract Financial Statements for the period from May 12, 1999 (inception) to June 30, 1999, for period from July 1, 1999 to December 31, 1999 and for the period from May 12, 1999 (inception) to December 31, 1999 APPENDIX L - itract Financial Statements for the three months ended March 31, 2000 and for the period from May 12, 1999 (inception) to March 31, 2000
-iv-
S-410th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 10th
QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE TRANSACTION Q: Why is Margo proposing these transactions? A: Margo believes that the consummation of these transactions presents an opportunity for Margo's shareholders to participate in an Internet based company that is developing a system that will allow companies to direct market their products and services in a more efficient and cost effective manner. The mergers will afford itract access to Margo's cash obtained from the sale of Margo's existing nursery and other subsidiaries. To review Margo's reasons for the merger in greater detail, see pages 26 to 28. Q: Why is Margo proposing to merge with Holdings, a new Delaware corporation, prior to the merger with itract? A: Since Margo is a Puerto Rico corporation, a merger of Margo or a subsidiary of Margo with and into itract would have been a taxable transaction to itract's members for federal income tax purposes. By first merging Margo with and into itract, Inc., a Delaware corporation, the merger of a subsidiary of Holdings with and into itract will be tax-exempt to itract's members for federal income tax purposes to the extent that they are transferring property to Holdings for stock. Also, Delaware is one of the preferred jurisdictions for public companies because of its established body of corporate law. Thus, Margo and itract believe that being organized as a Delaware corporation may facilitate Holdings' ability to obtain debt and equity financing in the future. Q: Will the mergers with Holdings and itract have any effect on the currently outstanding shares of Margo? A: Yes. Following Margo's merger with Holdings, Margo's shareholders will receive one share of common stock of Holdings for each share of Margo common stock. The merger of the subsidiary of Holdings into itract and the issuance of the Holdings common stock to itract's members will not have any effect on the shares of Holdings common stock received by Margo shareholders in the reincorporation merger, except that the number of outstanding shares of Holdings will increase from approximately 2.0 million shares to approximately 15.2 million shares. Following the completion of both mergers, on a fully diluted basis, Margo's shareholders will own 13.2% of Holdings and itract's members will own 86.8% of Holdings. Following the transactions, Holdings will be a holding company whose sole asset will be its 100% membership interest in itract. Q: Why is Margo proposing to sell its nursery and other subsidiaries? A: The sale of Margo's nursery and other subsidiaries is a condition to the obligation of itract to consummate the itract merger. Q: Who needs to approve the reincorporation merger and the sale of Margo's businesses? A: Holders of a majority of Margo's outstanding common stock need to approve the proposed reincorporation merger and the sale of Margo's nursery operations and other businesses. Michael J. Spector, the Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and President of Margo, and Margaret D. Spector, the Secretary of Margo, who together hold 65.7% of the outstanding shares of Margo common stock, have agreed to vote all of their shares of Margo common stock in favor of the proposed transactions. Q: What does a holder of Margo common stock need to do now? A: After reading this proxy statement/prospectus, such holders need to indicate on their proxy card how they want to vote their shares and sign and mail the completed proxy card in the enclosed return envelope as soon as possible so that their shares can be represented and voted at the Margo annual meeting. Q: If you own shares of Margo common stock held in "street name" by a broker, can that broker vote those shares for you? A: A broker that holds shares of Margo common stock will not be able to vote those shares without instructions from the beneficial owner of those shares. Therefore, owners of Margo 1
S-411th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 11th
common stock should instruct their broker to vote their shares, following the procedure provided by their brokers. Q: Can a holder of Margo common stock change its vote after signing the proxy card? A: Yes. Holders of Margo common stock can change their vote at any time before their proxy card is voted at the annual meeting. This can be done in one of three ways. First, holders may send a written notice to Margaret D. Spector, Secretary of Margo (at the address set forth on page 2), stating that the proxy should be revoked. Second, a new proxy card may be completed and submitted to Ms. Spector in the same manner. Third, Margo's shareholders may attend the annual meeting and vote in person. Attendance alone will not, however, revoke a proxy. If a broker has been instructed to vote Margo shares, the broker's procedures must be followed to change those instructions. Q: When does Margo expect the mergers to be completed? A: Margo expects to complete the mergers during the third quarter of 2000. Q: Will the composition of Holdings' board of directors following the mergers be different than Margo's board of directors prior to the mergers? A: Yes. As a condition to the consummation of the merger with itract, Holdings' directors must resign and a new board consisting of designees of itract will be elected. For information regarding the directors of Holdings following the merger with itract, see "Directors and Principal Officers of Holdings after the Merger" at pages 47 to 48. Q: What other matters will be voted on at the meeting? A: In addition to approving the reincorporation merger, the Margo shareholders will also be asked to vote on the following proposals: o The approval of the Stock Purchase Agreement with Empresas Margo, Inc., providing for the sale of Margo's existing nursery and other subsidiaries. o The reelection of the current five directors to serve on Margo's board of directors until the consummation of the reincorporation merger and, if the reincorporation merger is not consummated, until their successors are duly elected. When casting their votes on these additional proposals, Margo's shareholders desiring the consummation of the merger with itract should bear in mind that shareholder approval of the reincorporation merger and of the sale of the nursery and other subsidiaries is a condition which must be met by Margo before itract is obligated to consummate the merger. Q: Where can more information about Margo be found? A: Margo files periodic reports and other information with the Securities and Exchange Commission. This information may be read or copied at the SEC's public reference facilities. Please call the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330 for information about these facilities. This information is also available at the SEC's Internet site (http://www.sec.gov) and the offices of the National Association of Securities Dealers. For a more detailed description of information available, see "Where You Can Find More Information" at page 94. Q: Who can help answer any questions? A: If you are a Margo shareholder and have more questions about the proposed transaction, you can contact: Alfonso Ortega Chief Financial Officer Margo Caribe, Inc. Road 690, Kilometer 5.8 Vega Alta, Puerto Rico 00692 Telephone: (787) 883-2570 2
S-412th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 12th
SUMMARY This summary highlights selected information from this proxy statement/prospectus. It does not contain all of the information that may be important to you. You should carefully read this entire document and the other documents which are referred to herein. Together, these documents will give you a more complete description of the transactions Margo is proposing. The Companies Margo Caribe, Inc. Road 690, Kilometer 5.8 Vega Alta, Puerto Rico 00692 (787) 883-2570 Margo Caribe, Inc. ("Margo") is a Puerto Rico corporation engaged in the production and distribution of tropical and flowering plants, the sale and distribution of lawn and garden products as well as landscaping design and installation services. Margo is also engaged in seeking sites for the development of residential housing projects. itract, LLC 220 West 19th Street, 12th Floor New York, New York 10011 (212) 647-8483 itract, LLC ("itract") is a privately-held Internet based company that was organized in May 1999 to address the needs of small to medium-sized businesses that desire a more efficient and cost-effective means to direct market their products and services. The itract system is intended to allow these businesses to analyze, assemble and launch their direct marketing campaigns in a simple low-cost and effective manner. By accessing itract's Web site, users will be able to develop and launch comprehensive direct marketing campaigns delivering fax, e-mail and postal mail to a targeted audience of both on-line and off-line prospective customers. To date, itract has not earned any revenues. itract anticipates that it will begin to generate revenues following the launch of its Web site on June 30, 2000. iTract, Inc. Road 690, Kilometer 5.8 Vega Alta, Puerto Rico 00692 (787) 883-2570 iTract, Inc. ("Holdings") is a Delaware corporation that was formed by Margo on April 5, 2000 as a wholly-owned subsidiary for the sole purpose of effecting the merger transactions. Holdings has no assets other than a wholly-owned subsidiary (which also has no assets) which will merge with and into itract. Prior to such merger, Margo will merge into Holdings with Holdings as the survivor of such merger. Following these transactions, Holdings will be a holding company whose sole asset will be its 100% membership interest in itract. As a result of these mergers, the current shareholders of Margo and members of itract will be shareholders of Holdings. The Mergers The merger agreement between Margo and Holdings is the document that governs the reincorporation of Margo as a Delaware corporation by merging Margo with and into Holdings It is attached to this proxy statement/prospectus as Appendix A. The agreement and plan of merger among Margo, Holdings, itract LLC, iTract Acquisition Company, LLC and International Commerce Exchange Systems, Inc. ("ICES") is the document that governs the merger of iTract Acquisition Company LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Holdings, with and into itract. It is attached to this proxy statement/prospectus as Appendix B. Margo encourages you to read these documents, as they are the legal documents that govern the mergers. 3
S-413th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 13th
The Sale of Margo's Existing Subsidiaries The stock purchase agreement with Empresas Margo, Inc., is the document that governs the sale of Margo's nursery subsidiary and other subsidiaries to Empresas Margo, Inc. It is attached to this proxy statement/prospectus as Appendix C. Margo encourages you to read this document as it governs the disposition of all of Margo's current businesses. What Holders of Margo Stock Will Receive in the Reincorporation Merger Each share of Margo common stock will be exchanged for one share of Holdings common stock at the effective date of the reincorporation merger of Margo with and into Holdings. What Holders of itract Membership Units Will Receive in the itract Merger Holders of itract membership units will receive in the itract merger an amount of shares of Holdings common stock that will constitute, on a fully diluted basis, 86.8% the outstanding shares of Holdings common stock immediately following the itract merger. Reasons for the itract Merger Margo believes that the merger with itract offers its shareholders the opportunity to create shareholder value by participating in a growing sector of commerce and the economy-the Internet. Recommendations to Margo Shareholders Margo's board of directors believes that the proposed transactions are fair to Margo's shareholders and in their best interests, and unanimously recommends that the Margo shareholders vote "FOR" the following items: o approval of the merger agreement with Holdings providing for the reincorporation of Margo as a Delaware corporation; o approval of the stock purchase agreement with Empresas Margo, Inc., providing for the sale of Margo's nursery subsidiary and other subsidiaries; and o reelection of the existing five directors to serve as Margo's board of directors pending consummation of the merger with Holdings and, if the merger is not consummated, until their successors are duly elected. The reincorporation merger and the sale of Margo's nursery subsidiary and other subsidiaries are conditions to the itract merger. Votes Required for Approval of Merger with Holdings and the Sale of the Businesses Holders of more than 50% of Margo's outstanding common stock need to approve the proposed reincorporation merger and the stock purchase agreement providing for the sale of Margo's nursery subsidiary and other subsidiaries. Margo's directors and officers, and their affiliates, own approximately 68% of Margo's outstanding common stock. Michael J. Spector, Margo's Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and President, and his wife, Margaret D. Spector, Margo's Secretary, have entered into an agreement to vote all of their shares of Margo, constituting 65.7% of the outstanding Margo common stock, in favor of the reincorporation merger of Margo with Holdings and the sale of the nursery operations and other businesses. The vote of Mr. and Mrs. Spector in favor of the proposal submitted in this proxy statement/prospectus is sufficient for their approval. The vote of itract's members is not required for the consummation of the itract merger. Opinions of Financial Advisors Schwartz Heslin Group, Inc. provided a written opinion to Margo's board of directors as to the fairness of the merger with itract to Margo's shareholders from a financial point of view. This written opinion is attached as Appendix D to this document. You should read this entire opinion carefully, as well as the additional information set forth under the heading "THE TRANSACTION--Opinion of Financial Advisor Regarding Merger with itract" 4
S-414th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 14th
at pages 28 to 30, to understand the procedures followed, assumptions made, matters considered and limitations of the review undertaken by Schwartz Heslin Group in providing its opinion. San Juan Holdings, Inc. provided a written opinion to Margo's board of directors as to the fairness to Margo's shareholders of the sale by Margo of its nursery and other subsidiaries from a financial point of view. This written opinion is attached as Appendix E to this document. You should read this entire opinion carefully, as well as the additional information set forth under the heading "SALE OF MARGO'S BUSINESSES-Opinion of Financial Advisor Regarding Sale of Margo's Businesses" at pages 89 to 91, to understand the procedures followed, assumptions made, matters considered and limitations of the review undertaken by San Juan Holdings, Inc. in providing its opinion. These opinions are directed to Margo's board of directors and do not constitute a recommendation to any of Margo's shareholders as to how such shareholders should vote at the annual meeting. Interests of Persons Involved in the Merger In connection with the execution of the letter of intent between Margo and itract, Michael J. Spector, the Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of Margo, and J. Morton Davis, who beneficially own 65.7% and 9.8%, respectively, of Margo's outstanding common stock, made a $2.0 million loan to ICES, the indirect parent company of itract. The entire principal balance plus accrued interest on the loan is payable immediately following the effective time of the merger with itract. If the itract merger is not consummated, this loan will be converted into common stock of ICES. Michael J. Spector owns all of the outstanding capital stock of Empresas Margo, Inc. and will act as its Chief Executive Officer. In addition, all options to purchase shares of Margo common stock held by Margo's officers and directors will be converted into options to purchase the same number of shares of Holdings common stock and such options will become immediately exercisable upon consummation of the reincorporation merger. See "THE MARGO ANNUAL MEETING-Share Ownership of Management and Certain Shareholders." Board of Directors and Management of Holdings following the Merger with itract Upon consummation of the merger with itract, the board of directors of Holdings will initially consist of six directors designated by itract. The present management team of itract will serve as Holdings' management team after the merger. See "THE TRANSACTION-Directors and Principal Officers of Holdings after the Merger." Dissenters' Rights of Appraisal Margo Shareholders Holders of Margo common stock who dissent to the reincorporation merger have the right to seek an appraisal of, and to be paid in cash an amount that the Puerto Rico Court decides is the fair value of their shares. This amount may be more or less than the value of the shares of the Holdings common stock you would receive pursuant to the reincorporation merger. Section 10.12 of the Puerto Rico General Corporations Law of 1995, which governs the rights of shareholders of Puerto Rico companies who wish to seek appraisal of their shares, is discussed under the heading "THE TRANSACTION-Terms of the Merger Agreement with Holdings-Dissenters' Rights of Appraisal" at pages 32 to 34, and is attached to this proxy statement/prospectus as Appendix F. If you wish to exercise your dissenter's rights of appraisal, you must not vote in favor of the merger with Holdings and must take a series of steps which are set out in full in Appendix F. Regulatory Approval No submissions to the Antitrust Division of the Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission are required of Margo pursuant to the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act. 5
S-415th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 15th
Federal and Puerto Rico Income Tax Consequences The exchange of shares of common stock of Margo for shares of common stock of Holdings will be a taxable transaction for U.S. shareholders for federal income tax purposes. It is a condition to the closing of the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement with itract that Margo receive a ruling from the Puerto Rico Treasury Department confirming that the merger of Margo into Holdings qualifies as a tax-free reorganization for Puerto Rico income tax purposes. The merger of a subsidiary of Holdings with itract has been structured so that neither Holdings, its shareholders, nor itract will recognize any gain or loss for Federal income taxes in that merger. itract's members will not recognize any gain or loss for Federal income tax purposes in that merger to the extent they exchange property for stock. For a description of certain Puerto Rico and Federal income tax consequences of the transaction to holders of the Margo common stock, see "THE TRANSACTION-Terms of the Merger Agreement with Holdings-Federal and Puerto Rico Income and Other Tax Consequences of the Reincorporation Merger" commencing on page 34 and "THE TRANSACTION-Terms of the Merger Agreement with itract-Material Federal Income Tax Consequences" commencing on page 43. Exchange of Stock Certificates After the reincorporation merger with Holdings is completed, you will be sent written instructions for exchanging your Margo stock certificates for new Holdings stock certificates. Listing on the NASDAQ SmallCap Market Margo's common stock is listed on the Nasdaq SmallCap Market under the symbol "MRGO." Holdings will apply to have its shares of common stock listed on the Nasdaq SmallCap Market. It is a condition to the obligation of itract to consummate the itract merger that the shares of Holdings be listed on the Nasdaq SmallCap Market. SUMMARY HISTORICAL AND PRO FORMA FINANCIAL INFORMATION The following table shows the financial results actually achieved by each of Margo and itract (the "historical figures") as well as the results as if the companies had been combined for the period shown (the "pro forma combined" figures) under the following circumstances: (1) that the sale of Margo's nursery and other subsidiaries to Empresas Margo, Inc. has been consummated, (2) that all outstanding stock options to purchase shares of Margo and options to purchase membership units of itract were exercised, and (3) that no Margo shareholder dissents to the reincorporation merger and exercises any appraisal rights. You should not assume that Margo and itract would have achieved the combined pro forma results if they had actually been combined during the periods shown. Margo's and itract's historical figures for the three months ended March 31, 2000 are unaudited, but management of Margo and itract each believes that its own figures reflect all normal recurring adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of the financial position and results of operations for that period. You should not assume that the results for the three months ended March 31, 2000 will be repeated in later periods. Selected Historical and Pro Forma Data as of March 31, 2000 (Unaudited) Margo itract Pro Forma Historical Historical Equivalent ---------- ---------- ---------- Total assets $8,783,972 $387,016 $5,733,511 Cash and cash equivalents 640,046 7,523 5,354,018 Total liabilities 2,541,584 1,185,347 1,195,347 Shareholders' equity (deficiency) 6,242,388 (798,331) 4,538,163 6
S-416th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 16th
Selected Historical and Pro Forma Data for the Period Ended December 31, 1999(1) and the Three Months Ended March 31, 2000 [Enlarge/Download Table] Three Months Ended Period Ended March 31, 2000 December 31, 1999(1) (Unaudited) ------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------- Pro Forma Margo itract Pro Forma Margo itract Equivalent Historical Historical Equivalent Historical Historical (Unaudited) ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------- Net Sales $2,107,556 0 0 $6,201,233 0 0 Net Loss ($19,233) ($850,554) ($850,554) ($127,867) ($494,302) ($494,302) ------------- (1) Margo's fiscal year is the calendar year ending December 31, while itract's fiscal year ends June 30. This period refers to Margo's fiscal year ended December 31, and covers for itract the period from May 12, 1999 (inception) to December 31, 1999. COMPARATIVE PER SHARE INFORMATION The following table sets forth unaudited data concerning the net income (loss), dividends or distributions and book value per share of common stock for Margo and per membership unit for itract on a pro forma basis after giving effect to the proposed mergers. The book value per share or unit is not presented for the period ended December 31, 1999 as a pro forma balance sheet was not prepared as of this date. Pro Forma Per Share Data Three Months Period Ended Ended March 31, 2000 December 31, 1999(1) -------------------- -------------------- Net loss per weighted average common share (basic and diluted) ($0.06) ($0.03) Weighted average common shares outstanding 15,225,924 15,225,924 Dividends declared per share -- -- Book value per share at end of period $0.30 N/A ------------- (1) This period refers to Margo's fiscal year ended December 31, and covers for itract the period from May 12, 1999 (inception) to December 31, 1999. 7
S-417th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 17th
The following tables set forth data concerning the historical net income (loss), dividends or distributions and book value per share of common stock for Margo and per membership unit for itract. Margo Historical Per Share Data [Enlarge/Download Table] Three Months Ended March 31, Year Ended December 31, (Unaudited) --------------------------- ------------------------------------------ 2000 1999 1999 1998 1997 ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- Net income (loss) per weighted average common share (basic and diluted) ($0.01) $0.03 ($0.07) ($0.59) ($0.40) Weighted average common shares outstanding 1,878,860 1,875,322 1,875,322 1,878,655 1,895,322 Dividends declared per share -- -- -- -- -- Book value per share at end of period $3.32 $3.43 $3.33 $3.39 $3.97 itract Historical Per Unit Data Three Months Period from May 12, 1999 Ended March 31, 2000 (inception) through (Unaudited) December 31, 1999 -------------------- ------------------------ Net loss per weighted average membership unit (basic and diluted) ($0.08) ($0.05) Weighted average membership unit outstanding 10,719,997 10,000,000 Distributions declared per membership unit -- -- Book value per membership unit at end of period ($0.07) ($0.05) 8
S-418th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 18th
RISK FACTORS In addition to the other information contained in this proxy statement/prospectus, shareholders of Margo should carefully review the following factors in deciding whether to vote in favor of approval of the proposed transactions. Following the transactions, Holdings will be a holding company whose sole asset will be its 100% membership interest in itract. Therefore, when voting on the proposed transactions, you should consider the risks and difficulties that may be encountered by itract, an early-stage internet based company. These risks include risks particular to itract and its technology, and general risks associated with companies doing business on the Internet. Risks Associated with itract's Business itract Has a Limited Operating History and May Never Achieve Profitability. itract was organized in May 1999 and has not generated any revenue to date. itract has expended and will continue to expend substantial resources to create, launch and enhance its services. Because of itract's limited operating history, it is extremely difficult to evaluate its business and prospects. itract's revenue and income potential are unproven. Since the way in which the Internet is used is constantly changing, itract may need to change its business strategy to adapt to those changes. itract's business should be evaluated in light of the risks and difficulties frequently encountered by early-stage companies engaged in Internet commerce. Such risks include: o lack of sufficient capital; o uncertain market acceptance of its products and services; o the ability to develop and upgrade infrastructure; o competition; o reliance on the Internet; o dependence upon and need to hire key personnel; o need to manage changing operations; o regulatory risks associated with itract's business. itract may not be successful in addressing these risks, and its business strategy may not be successful. itract Has a History of Losses and an Expectation of Continuing Losses. itract has incurred losses since inception, including a net loss of $850,554 for the quarter ended March 31, 2000. As of March 31, 2000, itract had an accumulated deficit of $798,331, representing accumulated losses of $1,344,856 offset by capital contributions of $546,525. itract expects to continue to incur losses and have negative cash flow from operations for the foreseeable future. itract has invested substantial capital in technology and infrastructure development, and expects to expend even greater amounts in these areas as it begins to provide its services to customers on its Web site. itract will need to invest substantial financial and other resources to complete development of its Web site and develop and introduce new services. In addition, itract will be required to expend substantial financial resources to expand its sales and marketing efforts and operating infrastructure. itract expects that its cost of revenue, and sales and marketing, general and administrative, and customer support expenses, as well as other expenses, will increase if and when revenues are realized. itract will need to generate significant revenue to achieve profitability. Further, even if itract were to achieve profitability, itract may not be able to sustain profitability in the future. 9
S-419th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 19th
itract's Business Will Suffer If the Market for Outsourced Direct Marketing Services in General, and Email and Fax Marketing Services in Particular, Fails to Grow. The market for outsourced direct marketing via email and fax is new and rapidly evolving. If sufficient demand for itract's services does not develop, itract may not generate sufficient revenue to offset its costs and itract may never become profitable. Market acceptance of itract's services will depend on the acceptance and use of outsourced email and fax direct marketing services. These services are very different from the traditional advertising and direct mail methods that itract's targeted customers have historically used to attract new customers and maintain customer relationships. Businesses that have already invested substantial resources in traditional or other methods of marketing and communications may be reluctant to adopt new marketing strategies and methods. Consumers may also be reluctant to alter established patterns of purchasing goods and services. Intense Competition Exists in Internet-Based Direct Marketing Services and itract Expects Competition to Continue to Intensify. Competition for Internet-based direct marketing in general, and email and fax services in particular, is intense. If itract does not respond successfully to competitive pressures, itract may not be able to develop sufficient market share to support its operations. itract may not be able to compete successfully against current or future competitors. Such competitors include the in-house email capabilities of many businesses. An increasing number of companies are entering the market for direct marketing alternatives via the Internet. Many of itract's competitors have greater brand recognition, longer operating histories, larger customer bases and greater financial, marketing and other resources than itract. These factors may place itract at a disadvantage when itract responds to its competitors' pricing strategies, technological advances and other initiatives. Additionally, itract's competitors may develop or provide services that are superior to itract's or that achieve greater market acceptance. itract expects competition to persist and intensify. Barriers to entry may be substantial and itract may face substantial and growing competitive pressures from companies both in the United States and abroad. See "Information About itract - Competition" for a list of itract's competitors. itract's Inability to Comply with Federal Law Relating to the Transmission of Unsolicited Faxes May Harm itract's Business. Federal law makes it unlawful to use a computer or other device to send an unsolicited advertisement to a telephone facsimile machine, and provides a private right of action to recover $500 for each violation of this law. To the extent itract sells fax numbers to its customers, itract intends that all such numbers will belong to individuals that have explicitly agreed to receive advertisements transmitted to their fax machines. In addition, itract will require its customers that use their own fax mailing lists to acknowledge that such lists consist only of individuals that have agreed to receive the information being transmitted. However, despite itract's efforts, there can be no assurance that itract will be able to comply with the law, and itract may also be held responsible for violations of its customers. If itract is found to have violated this federal law, itract may have to pay significant damages, its reputation will be harmed and its business will suffer. itract's Failure to Manage its Planned Rapid Growth Could Cause its Business to Suffer. itract's failure to manage its growth effectively could result in service disruptions, loss of competitive position and lack of adequate financial controls. itract plans to expand its operations rapidly and to significantly augment its infrastructure. itract must effectively manage its operational, customer service and financial systems, procedures and controls to manage this planned growth. Any growth will result in increased responsibility for existing and new management personnel. itract's ability to grow will depend in part on its ability to recruit, train, motivate and manage employees. Growth will place a significant strain on itract's managerial, operational and financial resources. Delays in Upgrading of itract's Web site and Offering New Services May Harm itract's Business. itract has completed the testing of a "beta"version of its software and launched a basic "version 1.0" of its Web site on June 30, 2000. itract has experienced delays in the development and launch of its Web site. In addition, several features intended to be provided by the itract system were not included in version 1.0. These features, which itract intends to make available by September 2000, will provide itract's clients with a wide variety of targeted marketing capabilities and the use of "reward points." Several 10
S-420th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 20th
factors may delay the development and launch of these additional features as well as any other new services which may be developed in the future. itract also expects to improve the itract system on an ongoing basis to increase its ease of use and to remedy any defects that it may discover. Delays or failure to improve the itract system or to develop new services could result in itract's failure to attract and retain clients and may result in the loss of existing clients. itract's Faxing Capabilities are Dependent on Third Party Licenses and Relationships; itract May Need to License Additional Technologies to Succeed in its Business. itract licenses software technology which enables it to send faxes through the Internet, and itract is dependent on support services provided by third parties for the integration of such software with itract's hardware and proprietary software. If itract's outside service providers cease operations or otherwise become unavailable to itract, and itract is not able to promptly find a suitable replacement, the itract system will be unable to transmit faxes and itract's business will be materially harmed. Prior to the launch of "version 1.0" of the itract system, itract anticipated licensing such software and obtaining support services from a particular entity which subsequently ceased operations. As a result, itract was forced to delay the launch of version 1.0 of its Web site and incur additional costs. If a similar occurrence were to occur in the future, itract's business could be disrupted and may be adversely affected. In the future, itract may need to license additional technologies to remain competitive. There is no assurance that itract will be able to license these technologies on commercially reasonable terms, or at all. itract's inability to obtain any license could delay the development of its services until equivalent technology can be identified, licensed and integrated. Such delays could cause itract's business to suffer. Further, third party licenses may expose itract to increased risks. Such risks include: o risks related to the integration of new technology; o the diversion of resources from the development of itract's own proprietary technology; and o itract's inability to generate revenue from licensed technology sufficient to offset associated acquisition and maintenance costs. Unknown Software Defects Could Disrupt itract's Services. itract's service offerings depend on its complex proprietary software. Such software often contains defects, particularly when first introduced or when new versions are released. These defects may not be discovered until after such software has been in use for a significant amount of time. Accordingly, the itract system may be subject to unknown defects. These defects could: o cause service interruptions; o increase itract's service costs; o cause itract to lose revenue; o delay market acceptance; and o divert itract's development resources. Although itract tests its software, itract may not discover software defects that affect current or planned services or enhancements until after they are deployed. itract's Quarterly Operating Results May Fluctuate and Fall below Market Expectations Which Could Negatively Affect The Value of Holdings' Common Stock Following the itract Merger. itract's operating results will be difficult to predict. itract's future quarterly operating results may fluctuate significantly. If this occurs, Holdings' results may not meet the expectations of securities analysts or investors and 11
S-421st Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 21st
the price of Holdings' common stock would likely decline, perhaps substantially. Factors that may cause fluctuations of itract's operating results include the following: o the level of market acceptance of itract's products and services; o delays itract may encounter in introducing new products and services; o competitive developments; and o changes in pricing policies and resulting margins. itract expects that most of its revenues will be derived from email, fax and postal marketing services. The volume and timing of orders are difficult to predict because the market for these products is in its infancy and the sales cycle may vary substantially from customer to customer. Moreover, itract's sales are expected to fluctuate due to seasonal or cyclical marketing campaigns. itract May Not Be Able to Obtain Additional Capital to Fund its Operations When Needed. itract expects that the cash available to Holdings upon the consummation of the itract merger, together with anticipated revenues from its services, will be sufficient to fund its capital requirements through the fiscal year ending June 30, 2001. However, itract's capital requirements are subject to numerous contingencies associated with early-stage companies. itract may be required to seek additional financing in the event of delays, cost overruns or unanticipated expenses associated with a company in an early stage of development or in the event itract does not realize anticipated revenues. In addition, itract may seek financing in the future to expand its service offerings or to make strategic acquisitions. There can be no assurance that such financing will be available, or that, if available, such financing will be on terms favorable to itract. If itract cannot obtain adequate funds on acceptable terms, itract may be unable to: o fund its capital requirements; o take advantage of strategic opportunities; o respond to competitive pressures; and o develop or enhance its services. If Holdings raises additional funds through the issuance of equity securities, shareholders of Holdings following the itract merger may experience dilution, and if Holdings raises funds by issuing debt, it may be subject to certain limitations on its operations. itract's Business Will Suffer If it Does Not Attract and Retain Additional Highly Skilled Personnel. itract currently has only seven employees. In order for itract to succeed, it must identify, attract, retain and motivate highly skilled technical, managerial, sales and marketing personnel. Failure to retain and attract necessary personnel will limit itract's ability to compete effectively and provide services to its customers. itract plans to significantly expand its operations and will need to hire additional personnel as its business grows. Competition for qualified personnel is intense. itract may experience difficulties in hiring highly skilled technical personnel due to significant competition for experienced personnel in the Internet industry. Need to Attract and Retain Executive Personnel. Following the itract merger, itract will need to recruit and hire additional executive officers, including a Chief Executive Officer and a full time Chief Financial Officer. Such personnel are in short supply, and the competition for their services is intense. The process of identifying and recruiting executive personnel with the requisite combination of skills may be lengthy. Failure to recruit such personnel could have an adverse impact on the ability of itract to successfully implement its business plan. 12
S-422nd Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 22nd
itract May Not Be Able to Successfully Operate its Business If itract's Newly Formed Management Team Does Not Work Effectively Together. If itract's management team is unable to work together effectively, its business could be harmed. As itract was only formed in May 1999, its executive officers and employees have had a limited time to work together and may not be able to work together effectively. Entities Affiliated With itract Will Have Significant Control of Holdings after the itract Merger; Conflicts of Interest. ICES, through its subsidiary The TechDepartment.com, Inc., currently owns approximately 91.7% of itract's outstanding units. Upon the consummation of the itract merger, the TechDepartment.com will own approximately 80% of the outstanding common stock of Holdings. Henry Kauftheil is currently the sole manager of itract and, upon the effectiveness of the itract merger, will be the Chairman of the Board of Holdings. Mr. Kauftheil is also the sole director of the TechDepartment.com and the Chairman and a controlling shareholder of ICES. Mr. Kauftheil controls the voting capital stock of both ICES and, as Chairman of ICES, of The TechDepartment.com. In addition, as described in the section of this proxy statement/prospectus entitled "Information About itract-Relationship with ICES and its Affiliates," itract currently occupies space leased by ICES and is provided various services from ICES and its affiliates such as investment banking, legal and accounting services as well as computer hardware, software and network services. itract is also indebted to ICES and its affiliates in the amount of $1,003,103 as of March 31, 2000. These arrangements create conflicts of interest for Mr. Kauftheil and the entities that he controls in acting in the best interests of himself and these entities as opposed to the shareholders of itract. Additionally, Mr. Kauftheil and these entities will be able to significantly influence all matters requiring approval by shareholders, including the election of directors and the approval of mergers or other business combination transactions. This concentration of ownership might also have the effect of delaying or preventing a change in control. itract May Face Claims for Activities of its Customers Which Could Harm itract's Business. A wide variety of laws and regulations govern the content of advertisements and regulate the sale of products and services. There is also uncertainty as to the application of these laws to the emerging world of advertising on the Internet. itract cannot predict whether its role in facilitating the marketing activities of its customers would expose it to liability under these laws. Providers of Internet products and services have been sued in the past, sometimes successfully, based on the content of material. In addition, some of the content may be compiled by itract or other parties. If such content is improperly used, it could result in liability. itract may also face civil or criminal liability for unlawful advertising or other activities of its customers. If itract is exposed to this kind of liability, itract could be required to pay substantial fines or penalties, redesign its business methods, discontinue some of its services or otherwise expend resources to avoid liability. Any costs incurred as a result of that liability or asserted liability could harm itract's business. itract May Lose Customers and its Reputation May Suffer Because of Spam; Government Regulation of Email Transmissions. A number of states have passed statutes prohibiting and/or regulating the transmission of unsolicited commercial email ("spam"). A number of statutes have also been introduced in Congress and state legislatures to impose penalties for sending unsolicited emails which, if passed, could impose additional restrictions on itract's business. In addition, a California court recently held that unsolicited email distribution is actionable as an illegal trespass for which the sender could be subject for monetary damages. While itract believes that its system and controls comply with current laws, there is no assurance that the itract system will not be utilized to transmit spam. Further, the growth and development of the market for online email may prompt calls for more stringent consumer protection laws that may impose additional burdens on those companies conducting business online. If itract fails in its efforts to limit the distribution of unsolicited bulk email, or spam, itract's business and reputation may be harmed and itract may be subject to claims for violations of Federal or state civil or criminal law. In addition, spam-blocking efforts by others may also result in the blocking of legitimate messages forwarded by itract on behalf of its customers. itract's reputation may be harmed if email addresses with its domain names are used in this manner. Any of these events may cause itract's customers to become dissatisfied with its services and such customers may terminate their relationship with itract. 13
S-423rd Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 23rd
itract Expects to Engage in Future Acquisitions That Could Entail Risks. itract expects to pursue acquisition or investment opportunities that would complement its current services, enhance its technical capabilities or offer growth opportunities. Acquisitions could entail many risks, such as: o difficulties in integrating acquired operations, technologies or services; o unanticipated costs associated with acquisitions that could harm operating results; o negative effects on the market price of Holdings common stock resulting from acquisition-related charges and the amortization of goodwill; o risks of entering markets in which itract has no or limited prior experience; and o dilution to then existing shareholders if shares of Holdings' common stock are issued as consideration in such acquisitions. itract Depends on Third-party Vendors for the Delivery of Postal Mail. itract will be dependent on one or more third-party vendors to handle the physical packaging and mailing of the postal mail to be delivered through the itract system. Accordingly, the failure of such vendors to satisfy on a timely basis the requirements of itract's customers could harm itract's business, operations and reputation. In addition, the termination of itract's relationship with such vendors without itract finding a prompt replacement would adversely effect itract's operations. Risks Associated with itract's Technology If itract is Unable to Adequately Protect its Intellectual Property, its Business Will Suffer. itract's ability to successfully compete is substantially dependent upon its internally developed technology, which it protects through a combination of copyright, trade secret and trademark law. itract has no issued patents or patent applications pending. In addition, effective copyright and trademark protection may be unenforceable or limited in certain countries. The failure of itract to adequately protect its proprietary rights may harm its business. In addition, unauthorized parties may attempt to copy or otherwise obtain and use itract's products or technology. Policing unauthorized use of itract's products is difficult, and itract cannot be certain that the steps it has taken will prevent misappropriation of its technology, particularly in foreign countries where the laws may not protect its proprietary rights as fully as in the United States. For a more detailed description of the protection of itract's intellectual property, please see "Information About itract -- Intellectual Property Rights." itract's Proprietary Technology May Be Subject to Infringement Claims Which Could Harm its Business. There is a substantial risk of litigation regarding intellectual property rights in the Internet industry. Claims against itract may be asserted based on itract's use of its own proprietary technology or technology which it licenses from third parties. Third parties may assert exclusive patent, copyright, trademark and other intellectual property rights to technologies and related standards that are utilized by itract. Future claims of infringement against itract with respect to it and its technology, with or without merit, could: o be time-consuming to defend; o result in costly litigation; o divert management's attention and resources; o cause delays in delivering products and services; o require the payment of monetary damages; o result in an injunction which would prohibit itract from offering a particular product or service; or 14
S-424th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 24th
o require itract to enter into royalty or licensing agreements. Royalty or licensing agreements, if required, may not be negotiated by itract on acceptable terms, or at all. For additional information, please see "Information About itract -- Intellectual Property Rights." If itract Fails to Upgrade its Systems and Infrastructure to Expand its Business and to Accommodate Increases in Email and Fax Transmissions, itract May Experience Slower Response Times or System Failures. itract will need to expand its network infrastructure as the number of its customers increases and as such customers' requirements change. Additionally, itract must adapt its network infrastructure to the increasing volume and complexity of information itract's customers wish to transmit. If itract does not add sufficient capacity to handle the growing volume and complexity of messages, itract could suffer slower response times or system failures which could result in a loss of customers. itract intends to make substantial investments in new hardware and in upgrading its software to increase capacity. itract's services may be unable to handle growing message volume and complexity. The expansion of itract's network infrastructure will also require substantial financial, operational and managerial resources. In addition, itract may not be able to accurately project the rate or timing of email and fax transmission increases or upgrade its systems and infrastructure to accommodate future traffic levels. As itract upgrades its network infrastructure to increase capacity available to its customers, itract may encounter equipment or software incompatibility which may cause delays in implementation. itract may not be able to expand or adapt its network infrastructure to meet additional demand of its clients or itract's clients' changing requirements in a timely manner or at all. Failure to Keep Pace with Rapidly Changing Technology and Market Conditions Could Affect itract's Competitiveness. itract will operate in an industry that is characterized by: o rapid technological change; o frequent new service introductions; o changing client demands; and o the emergence of new industry standards and practices that could render itract's services, proprietary technology and systems obsolete. itract must continually improve the performance, features and reliability of itract's services, particularly in response to competitive offerings. itract's success will depend, in part, on itract's ability to enhance its services and to develop new services, functionality and technology that address the increasingly sophisticated and varied needs of itract's prospective clients. The development of itract's technology and necessary service enhancements entail significant technical and business risks and require substantial expenditures and lead-time. itract may not be able to keep pace with the latest technological developments or adapt itract's services to client requirements or emerging industry standards. If itract Encounters System Failure, it May Not Be Able to Provide Adequate Service and its Business and Reputation Could Be Damaged. itract's ability to successfully receive orders for its services from customers and send email and fax messages and provide acceptable levels of customer service largely depends on the efficient and uninterrupted operation of itract's computer and communications hardware and network systems. itract's operations will depend on its ability to protect its computer systems against damage from a variety of sources, including telecommunications failures, malicious human acts, including computer viruses, and natural disasters. All of itract's communications systems will be located in New York, New York. As a result, if there were to be a natural disaster affecting the New York area, itract's communications systems could be disrupted and itract's business would be harmed. itract may not be able to 15
S-425th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 25th
relocate quickly under those circumstances. If any of these events occur, itract may be unable to provide its customers with services for indefinite periods of time. Service Interruptions from itract's Third Party Internet and Telecommunications Providers Could Harm its Business. itract will depend heavily on third party providers of Internet and telecommunications services. Any interruption by itract's Internet and telecommunications providers would likely disrupt the operation of itract's business, causing a loss of revenue and a potential loss of clients. Risks Associated with the Internet itract's Business Will Suffer If the Internet Does Not Achieve Continuing, Widespread Acceptance as a Marketing and Communications Medium. itract's revenue and profitability will be adversely affected if the Internet does not achieve continuing, widespread acceptance as a marketing and communications medium. itract's future success will depend substantially upon the continued evolution of the Internet as an attractive platform for marketing and communications applications and the use of outsourcing to solve businesses' marketing needs. Most businesses and consumers have only limited experience with the Internet as a marketing and communications medium. itract Will Not Be Able to Increase its Business Unless Consumers and Businesses Increase Their Use of the Internet and the Internet Is Able to Support the Demands of this Growth. itract's success depends on increasing use of the Internet by consumers and businesses. If use of the Internet as a medium for consumer and business communications does not continue to increase, demand for itract's services will be limited. Consumers and businesses might not increase their use of the Internet for a number of reasons, such as: o high Internet access costs; o perceived security and privacy risks; o legal and regulatory issues; o inconsistent service quality; and o unavailability of cost-effective, high-speed service. Even if consumers and businesses increase their use of the Internet, the Internet infrastructure may not be able to support the demands of this growth. The Internet infrastructure must be continually improved and expanded in order to alleviate overloading and congestion. Failure to do so will degrade the Internet's performance and reliability. Internet users may experience service interruptions as a result of outages and other delays occurring throughout the Internet. Frequent outages or delays may cause consumers and businesses to slow or stop their use of the Internet as a communications medium. Increased Governmental Regulation and Legal Uncertainties May Impair the Growth of the Internet and Decrease Demand for itract's Services or Increase itract's Cost of Doing Business. With the exception of state anti-spam laws, there are currently few laws and regulations directly applicable to the Internet and commercial email services. However, the adoption of additional laws or regulations may impair the growth of itract's business and the use of the Internet thereby decreasing the demand for itract's services and increasing itract's cost of doing business. A number of laws have been proposed involving the Internet, including laws addressing: o user privacy; o pricing; 16
S-426th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 26th
o content; o copyrights; o characteristics and quality of services; and o consumer protection. Changes in Telecommunications Regulations Could Cause Reduced Demand for itract's Services. Several telecommunications carriers are advocating that the Federal Communications Commission regulate the Internet in the same manner as other telecommunications services by imposing access fees on Internet service providers. These regulations could substantially increase the costs of communicating on the Internet. This, in turn, could slow the growth in Internet use and thereby decrease the demand for itract's services. Other risks relating to your investment in Margo and, following the reincorporation merger, in Holdings Margo's stock price has been, and is likely to continue to be, extremely volatile. Following Margo's announcement of the itract merger, Margo's stock price has been volatile and following the consummation of the proposed transactions, Holdings' stock price is likely to continue to be volatile. In addition, the Nasdaq SmallCap Market, where many publicly held Internet companies are traded, has recently experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations. These fluctuations are often unrelated or disproportionate to the operating performance of these companies. The trading prices of many Internet companies' stocks were recently at or near historical highs and the price to earnings multiples of many Internet companies are substantially above historical levels. These trading prices and multiples may not be sustainable. The market price of Holdings' common stock may be adversely affected by industry volatility regardless of its actual operating performance. In the past, following periods of volatility in the market price of a company's securities, securities class action litigation often has been instituted against that company. Similar litigation, if instituted against Holdings, could result in substantial costs and a diversion of its management's attention and resources. Your investment in Holdings stock may become illiquid and you may lose your entire investment. Following the reincorporation merger, Holdings will be required to meet Nasdaq's initial inclusion requirements which require it to have: o net tangible assets (total assets, excluding goodwill, minus total liabilities) of at least $4 million, or a market capitalization exceeding $50 million, or net income (in the latest fiscal year or two of the last three fiscal years) exceeding $750,000; o at least 1 million shares in the public float with a market value of at least $5 million (not including shares held directly or indirectly by any of Holdings' officers or directors or by any other person who beneficially owns more than ten percent of Holdings' total outstanding shares); o a minimum bid price of Holdings' common stock of $4 per share; o at least three market makers for Holdings common stock; o at least 300 shareholders of Holdings common stock (each of which holds at least 100 shares of common stock); and o an operating history of at least one year or a market capitalization exceeding $50 million. In addition, Holdings will be required to meet certain corporate governance tests promulgated by Nasdaq. 17
S-427th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 27th
Although the listing of Holdings' securities on Nasdaq is a condition to the closing of the itract merger, Holdings may not meet all of the requirements for initial listing and the parties to the itract merger agreement may determine to waive the listing requirement. Even if Holdings' securities are listed on Nasdaq following the reincorporation merger, Holdings. will need to meet the continued listing requirements of the Nasdaq Stock Market to remain listed. The failure of Holdings to meet the initial listing or maintenance requirements of Nasdaq could result in Holdings' securities trading on the OTC Bulleting Board or in the "pink sheets". As a consequence, an investor could find it more difficult to dispose of or to obtain accurate quotations as to the market value of Holdings' securities. Among other things, failure to list or delisting from Nasdaq may cause a decline in Holdings' stock price as well as difficulty in obtaining future financing. Penny stock regulations may affect your ability to sell Holdings' securities. If Holdings' securities fail to be listed on Nasdaq, such securities would become subject to Rule 15g-9 under the Exchange Act, which imposes additional sales practice requirements on broker dealers which sell such securities to persons other than established customers and accredited investors. Under these rules, broker-dealers who recommend penny stocks to persons other than established customers and "accredited investors" must make a special written suitability determination for the purchaser and receive the purchaser's written agreement to a transaction prior to sale. Securities are exempt from these rules if the market price is at least $5.00 per share. The SEC has adopted regulations that generally define a penny stock to be any equity security that has a market price of less than $5.00 per share, subject to certain exceptions. These exceptions include an equity security listed on the Nasdaq SmallCap Market, and an equity security issued by an issuer that has: o net tangible assets of at least $2,000,000, if the issuer has been in continuous operation for three years; o net tangible assets of at least $5,000,000, if the issuer has been in continuous operation for less than three years; or o average revenue of at least $6,000,000 for the preceding three years. Unless an exception is available, the regulations require the delivery, prior to any transaction involving a penny stock, of a disclosure schedule explaining the penny stock market and the associated risks. Anti-takeover provisions in Holdings' charter could negatively impact the trading price of its securities. Following the merger, Holdings' board of directors will have the authority to issue up to 5,000,000 shares of preferred stock without the need for shareholder approval. The board may also determine the economic and voting rights of this preferred stock. The holders of Holdings' common stock could be adversely affected by the issuance of preferred stock. Issuance of preferred stock could impede or prevent transactions that would cause a change in control of Holdings. This might discourage bids for Holdings common stock at a premium over its market price and adversely affect the trading price of Holdings' common stock. Holdings has no current plans to issue shares of preferred stock. Following the Mergers, Holdings will be Required to Indemnify the Former Officers and Directors of Margo and its Affiliates. Under the merger agreement with itract, Holdings is required to indemnify and hold harmless each present and former officer and director of Holdings, Margo, and Margo's other subsidiaries, from and against all claims and losses incurred in connection with any claim or lawsuit pertaining to any matter that existed or occurred at or prior to the time of the itract merger. No Dividends will be Paid in the Near Future. Following the consummation of the proposed transactions, Holdings does not anticipate that it will pay dividends in the foreseeable future. Holdings is likely to reinvest any funds that might otherwise be available for the payment of dividends in further development of its business following the itract merger. 18
S-428th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 28th
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS The forward looking statements made in this proxy statement/prospectus might prove inaccurate, resulting in a material difference between such statements and the actual results of Margo or Holdings. Some of the statements under "Summary," "Risk Factors," "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations," "Business", "Information About itract" and elsewhere in this proxy statement/prospectus constitute forward-looking statements. These statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause actual results, levels of activity, performance or achievements following the mergers to be materially different from any future results, levels of activity, performance, or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Such factors include, among other things, those listed under "Risk Factors" and elsewhere in this proxy statement/prospectus. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terminology such as "may," "will," "should," "could," "expects," "plans," "intends," "anticipates," "believes," "thinks," "estimates," "predicts," "potential" or "continue" or the negative of such terms and other comparable terminology. THE MARGO ANNUAL MEETING Purpose, Time and Place Margo is furnishing this proxy statement/prospectus to the holders of shares of Margo common stock in connection with the solicitation of proxies by its board of directors for use at Margo's annual meeting to be held on _________, 2000. The annual meeting will be held at The Bankers Club of Puerto Rico, Banco Popular Center, 209 Munoz Rivera Avenue, San Juan, Puerto Rico, at 10:00 a.m. local time and at any adjournments or postponements thereof. At the annual meeting, the holders of Margo common stock will be asked to vote on proposals to: o adopt and approve the agreement and plan of merger, dated as of June 21, 2000, by and between Margo and Holdings, providing for the reincorporation merger; o adopt and approve the stock purchase agreement, dated as of June 30, 2000, between Margo and Empresas Margo, Inc., providing for the sale of Margo's nursery operations and other businesses; o reelect the existing five directors to serve as Margo's board of directors pending consummation of the merger with Holdings and, in the event that the merger is not consummated, until such time as their successors are duly elected; Record Date; Voting Power Margo's board of directors has fixed the close of business (5:00 p.m., Puerto Rico time) on ___________, 2000 as the record date for determining the holders of shares of Margo common stock entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the annual meeting. Only holders of record of Margo common stock at the close of business on the record date will be entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the annual meeting. At the close of business on the record date, ___________ shares of Margo common stock were issued and outstanding and entitled to vote at the annual meeting. Holders of record of Margo common stock are entitled to one vote per share on any matter which may properly come before the meeting. Votes at the annual meeting may be cast in person or by proxy. The presence at Margo's annual meeting, either in person or by proxy, of the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of Margo common stock entitled to vote is necessary to constitute a quorum in order to transact business at the meeting. However, in the event that a quorum is not present at the annual meeting, Margo expects to adjourn or postpone the meeting in order to solicit additional proxies. 19
S-429th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 29th
Votes Required Approval by Margo's shareholders of the board of directors' proposals to adopt and approve the reincorporation merger with Holdings and the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement and the sale of Margo's nursery operations and other businesses will require the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the shares of Margo common stock outstanding on the record date. Under applicable Puerto Rico law, in determining if the board's proposals to adopt and approve the reincorporation merger with Holdings and the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement and the sale of Margo's nursery operations and other businesses have been approved by Margo's shareholders, abstentions by shareholders will have the same effect as a vote against the proposals, although they will count toward the presence of a quorum. Brokers who hold shares of Margo common stock as nominees, in the absence of instructions from the beneficial owners thereof, will not have discretionary authority to vote for approval and adoption of the reincorporation merger or the sale of the nursery farm and other businesses, but brokers who hold shares of Margo common stock as nominees will have such authority to vote such shares for the election of directors. Any shares which are not voted because the nominee-broker lacks discretionary authority will have the same effect as a vote against the proposals. Accordingly, any beneficial owner of Margo common stock whose stock is held by a broker as a nominee should instruct their broker as to how to vote their shares. See "Voting of Proxies" below. The affirmative vote of a plurality of the votes cast at the annual meeting will be required for the election of directors. For purposes of the election of directors, abstentions will not be treated as votes cast and will have no effect on the result of the vote. A properly executed proxy marked "WITHHOLD AUTHORITY" with respect to the election of one or more directors will not be treated as voted with respect to the directors indicated, although it will be counted for purposes of determining whether there is a quorum. Michael J. Spector and Margaret D. Spector (the "Spectors") jointly own more than a majority of the outstanding shares of Margo common stock. In connection with the execution of the merger agreement with itract, the Spectors entered into an agreement whereby they agreed to vote all their shares in favor of the reincorporation merger and the sale of Margo's businesses. The Spectors have sufficient votes to approve each of the proposals being submitted herewith and have indicated that they intend to vote for each of such proposals, including the election of the existing five directors. See "Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management." Voting of Proxies Shares of Margo common stock represented by properly executed proxies that Margo receives prior to the start of the annual meeting will be voted at the annual meeting in the manner specified by such proxies. Margo shareholders should be aware that, if their proxy is properly executed but does not contain voting instructions, their proxy will be voted FOR adoption and approval of each of the proposals before the annual meeting. Margo shareholders should also be aware that, if their proxy is not submitted or is improperly executed, their proxy will be voted against adoption and approval of each of the proposals. Margo does not expect that any matter other than as described herein will be brought before the annual meeting. If other matters are properly presented before the meeting, the persons named in a properly executed proxy will have authority to vote in accordance with their judgment on any other such matter, including without limitation, any proposal to adjourn or postpone the meeting or otherwise concerning the conduct of the meeting; provided, that a properly executed proxy that has been designated to vote against the adoption and approval of the proposals will not be voted, either directly or through a separate proposal, to adjourn the meeting to solicit additional votes. Revocability of Proxies The grant of a proxy on the enclosed proxy card or a vote by telephone, does not preclude a shareholder from voting in person. Also, a shareholder of Margo may revoke or change their vote on a proxy at any time prior to its exercise by: o delivering, prior to the start of the annual meeting, to Margaret Spector, Secretary of Margo, Road 690, Kilometer 5.8, Vega Alta, Puerto Rico 00692, a written notice of revocation bearing a later date or time than the proxy previously delivered to Margo, 20
S-430th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 30th
o delivering to the Secretary of Margo, at the prior address, a duly executed proxy with different instructions bearing a later date or time than the proxy previously delivered to Margo, or o attending the annual meeting and voting in person. Margo does not expect to adjourn its annual meeting for a period of time long enough to require the setting of a new record date for such meeting. If an adjournment occurs, it will have no effect on the ability of Margo's shareholders of record as of the record date to exercise their voting rights or to revoke any previously delivered proxies. Solicitation of Proxies Margo will bear the cost of the solicitation of proxies from its own shareholders. In addition to solicitation by mail, Margo's directors, officers and employees may solicit proxies from our shareholders by telephone, telegram or in person. Arrangements will also be made with brokerage houses and other custodians, nominees and fiduciaries for the forwarding of solicitation material to the beneficial owners of stock held of record by such persons, and Margo will reimburse such brokers, custodians, nominees and fiduciaries for their reasonable out-of-pocket expenses in connection therewith. Executive Compensation Summary Compensation Table The following table sets forth information regarding compensation of Margo's chief executive officer during each of the three years ended December 31, 1999, 1998 and 1997. No other executive officer of Margo earned more than $100,000 during 1999. [Enlarge/Download Table] Annual Compensation ---------------------------- Number of Name of Individual and Stock Options All Other Position with the Company Salary Bonus Granted(1) Compensation(2) ------------------------- ------ ----- ---------- --------------- Michael J. Spector 1999 $104,000 $ - 2,500 $8,000(2) Chairman, President, Chief 1998 104,000 - 2,500 8,000 Executive Officer and Director 1997 160,000 - - - --------------- (1) Includes 2,500 options granted to Margaret D. Spector, Michael J. Spector's wife, for each of 1998 and 1999. (2) Represents matching contribution under Margo's Salary Deferral Retirement Plan. Grant of Stock Options No stock options were granted to Michael J. Spector during the year ended December 31, 1999. However, the table below provides certain information regarding stock options granted to Margaret D. Spector as discussed above, which for SEC reporting purposes, Mr. Spector is deemed to beneficially own. 21
S-431st Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 31st
[Enlarge/Download Table] Potential realizable value at assumed annual rates of stock price appreciation from date of grant to end of option term ------------------------------------ # of shares underlying % of total options options granted Exercise Price Expiration Name granted(2) in Fiscal Year ($/share)(3) Date 5% 10% ------ ------------ ---------------- -------------- ------ ---- ---- Michael J. Spector(1) 2,500 12.5% $2.75 05-17-09 $1,075 $3,200 ------------- (1) Represents options to acquire 2,500 shares granted to Margaret D. Spector. (2) Options become exercisable at the rate of 20% on the each of first, second, third, fourth and fifth anniversary of the grant date. Upon consummation of the itract merger, all options will become immediately exercisable. (3) The exercise price is based on 110% of the last sales price for Margo's common stock on May 17, 1999, the date of grant. Options Exercised During 1999 and Option Values at December 31, 1999 The following table sets information on outstanding options held by Margo's chief executive officer and their value at December 31, 1999. There were no exercises of options during 1999. Value is calculated as the difference between the last sales price of the common stock and the exercise price at December 31, 1999, the last day the common stock traded during 1999. Upon consummation of the itract merger, all outstanding options of Margo will vest and become immediately exercisable. The information in the table is based on the original vesting schedule of the options without taking into account that such options will become automatically exercisable as part of the itract merger. [Enlarge/Download Table] Number of Shares Value of Unexercised Underlying In-The-Money Unexercised Options Options at at 12/31/99 12/31/99 (1)(2) --------------------------- ---------------------------- Shares Acquired Value Name On Exercise Realized Exercisable Unexercisable Exercisable Unexercisable ------ ----------- -------- ----------- ------------- ----------- ------------- Michael J. Spector(1) - - 31,000 11,500 $331 $1,325 --------------- (1) Includes 12,500 options held by Margaret D. Spector, the wife of Michael J. Spector. (2) Based on the last sales price of $25/16 per share on December 31, 1999 and an exercise price of $3.16, $3.44 and $1.65 for 20,000, 10,500 and 500 exercisable options, respectively, and an exercise price of $3.44, $1.65 and $2.75 for 7,000, 2,000 and 2,500 of unexercisable options, respectively. Employment Contracts Margo does not have an employment contract with Michael J. Spector. Salary Deferral Retirement Plan During 1998, Margo established a Salary Deferral Retirement Plan (the "Retirement Plan") under the provisions of the Puerto Rico Internal Revenue Code of 1994. The retirement plan only covers employees of Margo Caribe, Inc., the parent company, who are at least 21 years of age and have completed one year of service. Under the terms of the retirement plan, Margo matches up to 100% of the pre-tax contributions made by its employees in an amount equal to 10% of their basic salary subject to a maximum of $8,000. For the year ended December 31, 1999, Margo paid approximately $38,000 representing the matching contributions under the retirement plan for all participants. 22
S-432nd Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 32nd
Share Ownership of Management and Certain Shareholders The following tables set forth, as of June 1, 2000, the number of shares of common stock of Margo owned beneficially by the following persons: (a) each director of Margo; (b) all executive officers and directors of Margo as a group; and (c) each person known to Margo who owns more than 5% of the outstanding common stock of Margo. Unless otherwise stated, all shares are held with sole investment and voting power. The amount of shares shown below includes, as described in footnote 1, the amount of shares that the named person has the right to acquire pursuant to the exercise of stock options. All outstanding options of Margo will vest and become immediately exercisable upon consummation of the itract merger. Security Ownership as of June 1, 2000 [Enlarge/Download Table] Name (Position with the Company) Amount Beneficially Owned(1) Percent of Class(1) --------------------------- ---------------------------- ------------------- Michael J. Spector 1,279,182(2) 66.5% (Executive Officer and Director) Margaret D. Spector 1,279,182(2) 66.5% Carr. 690, Km. 5.8 Vega Alta, Puerto Rico 00646 (Executive Officer and Director) J. Morton Davis 185,249(3) 9.8% D.H. Blair Holdings, Inc. D.H. Blair Investment Banking Corp. 44 Wall Street New York, New York 1005 (Five Percent Shareholder) Frederick D. Moss (Director) 20,500 1.1% Blas R. Ferraiuoli (Director) 16,500 (4) Michael A. Rubin (Director) 17,500 (4) All Executive Officers and 1,365,982 68.9% Directors as a Group (7 persons) ----------------- (1) For each person or group includes the number of shares of common stock the named person(s) has the right to acquire upon exercise of stock options as shown below: o Michael J. Spector and Margaret D. Spector - 42,500 shares o Frederick D. Moss - 0 o Blas R. Ferraiuoli - 12,500 shares o Michael A. Rubin - 10,000 shares o All Executive Officers and Directors as a Group - 91,500 shares Percent of class does not include shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of stock options held by other persons. (2) Includes 939,394 shares held directly by Mr. Spector and 297,288 shares held by Mrs. Spector. Also includes stock options to acquire 30,000 and 12,500 shares held by Mr. Spector and Mrs. Spector, respectively. The Spectors share voting and investment power over the shares owned by each other. (3) This amount consists of 184,149 shares held in the name of D.H. Blair Investment Banking Corp., a registered broker-dealer which is wholly-owned by D.H. Blair Holdings, Inc., which in turn is wholly-owned by J. Morton Davis and of 1,100 shares owned by Rosalind Davidowitz, the spouse of Mr. Davis. This amount is based upon a Schedule 13G dated February 9, 1995, as amended, filed with the SEC. (4) Less than one percent. 23
S-433rd Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 33rd
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, requires Margo's directors and executive officers to report their ownership of and transactions in Margo's common stock to the SEC and the National Association of Securities Dealers. Copies of these reports are also required to be supplied to Margo. Specific dates for filing these reports have been established by the SEC, and Margo is required to report in the annual report any failure of its directors and executive officers to file by the relevant due date any of these reports during the fiscal year ended December 31, 1999. Based solely on its review of the copies of the report received by it, Margo believes that all such filing requirements were satisfied, except that each of Blas R. Ferraiuoli, Frederick D. Moss, Michael Rubin and Margaret D. Spector failed to timely file one report each, related to receipt of stock options. Frederick D. Moss failed to timely file two additional reports related to three purchases of common stock and Rene Llerandi failed to timely file one report related to the purchase of common stock. Performance Graph The following performance graph shall not be deemed incorporated by reference by any general statement incorporating by reference this proxy statement/prospectus into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except to the extent that Margo specifically incorporates this information by reference, and shall not otherwise be deemed filed under such Acts. The Performance Graph compares the yearly percentage change in Margo's cumulative total stockholder return on its common stock to that of the Center of Research in Securities Prices ("CRSP") Index for NASDAQ Stock Market (US Companies) and a Peer Group Index. The Peer Group Index consists of corporations engaged in the nursery business (Calloways Nursery Inc., Hines Horticulture Inc. and Griffin Land and Nurseries Inc.) The Performance Graph assumes (1) that $100 was invested on December 30, 1994 in the case of each of the CRSP Index for NASDAQ Stock Market (U.S. Companies), the Peer Group Index and Margo's common stock; and (2) the reinvestment of all dividends. 24
S-434th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 34th
Comparison of Five-Year Cumulative Total Returns Performance Graph for Margo Caribe, Inc. [GRAPH OMITTED] Legend [Enlarge/Download Table] CRSP Total Returns Index for: 12/1994 12/1995 12/1996 12/1997 12/1998 12/1999 ---------------------------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- Margo Caribe, Inc. 100.0 161.0 125.6 73.2 92.7 90.2 Nasdaq Stock Market (US Companies) 100.0 141.3 173.9 213.1 300.4 557.6 Self-Determined Peer Group 100.0 70.6 70.6 129.4 200.3 188.5 Companies in the Self-Determined Peer Group CALLOWAYS NURSERY INC GRIFFIN LAND AND NURSERIES INC HINES HORTICULTURE INC Notes: A. The lines represent monthly index levels derived from compounded daily returns that include all dividends. B. The indexes are reweighted daily, using the market capitalization on the previous trading day. C. If the monthly interval, based on the fiscal year-end, is not a trading day, the preceding trading day is used. D. The index level for all series was set to $100.0 on 12/30/1994. 25
S-435th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 35th
PROPOSED REINCORPORATION MERGER AND MERGER WITH ITRACT General This proxy statement/prospectus is being furnished to Margo shareholders in connection with the solicitation of proxies by Margo's board of directors from holders of the shares of Margo common stock for use at the annual shareholders' meeting to be held on ________, 2000. This proxy statement/prospectus also constitutes a prospectus of Holdings, which is part of a registration statement on Form S-4 filed with the SEC under the Securities Act, in order to register the shares of Holdings common stock to be issued to the holders of shares of Margo common stock and holders of itract membership units. Background of the Transaction Since the early part of 1998, the board of directors of Margo determined that it had to seek alternatives to enhance shareholder value. Margo began by looking for ways to become more efficient such as eliminating its unprofitable Florida operations. These efforts began to bear results with sales increasing by 16% during 1999 and the net losses from operations being reduced to $128,000 for 1999, compared to $1,113,000 for 1998. The board also examined the possibility of diversifying into real estate development. Puerto Rico's residential construction market has experienced various years of strong growth. To this end, Margo organized a real estate development company in the early part of 1998 and in August 1999 Margo optioned a 109 acre site for possible development as a real estate project. Despite these efforts the stock price of Margo continued to trade below book value. During the later part of December 1999, Michael J. Spector, the Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of Margo was approached by Alan Stahler, an investment banker based in New York City. Mr. Stahler asked Mr. Spector whether Margo would consider the possibility of merging with an early-stage Internet company. Mr. Stahler is the son-in-law of J. Morton Davis, the principal shareholder of D.H. Blair Investment Banking Corporation, which owns approximately 9.8% of Margo's outstanding common stock prior to the contemplated transactions. Mr. Stahler explained that this type of transaction would allow Margo shareholders the ability to participate at an early stage in an Internet company. It would also provide the Internet company with a vehicle for becoming a publicly held company without some of the costs and uncertainties involved in a public offering. On December 30, 1999, Mr. Spector met in New York City with Mr. Davis and Mr. Henry Kaufthiel, Chairman of ICES. ICES owns equity interests in various early-stage Internet companies. Certain affiliates of Mr. Davis have equity interests in ICES, and ICES through another entity owns approximately 92% of the equity interests of itract LLC. At the meeting, Mr. Kaufthiel explained to Mr. Spector the various Internet businesses that were being developed by ICES. During the first two weeks of January 2000, Mr. Spector met various times with Margo's outside counsel as well as with Blas Ferraiuoli and Michael Rubin, two of Margo's outside directors, to generally discuss the type of transaction that Margo might engage in with one of the Internet companies affiliated with ICES. On January 18, 2000, Mr. Spector met in New York with Mr. Stahler, Mr. Davis and Mr. Kaufthiel and other representatives of ICES. At the meeting, representatives of itract presented their business plan for the first three years of operations. On January 19, 2000, Mr. Davis informed Mr. Spector that he felt that itract LLC would be willing to pursue a merger transaction with Margo in which the members of itract would receive approximately 88% of the outstanding common stock of the resulting company in the merger. During the next two weeks, Mr. Spector discussed the idea of a possible merger on general terms with members of Margo's board of directors and outside attorneys. During this period, Mr. Spector requested more detailed financial projections from itract, which he received on January 27, 2000. 26
S-436th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 36th
During the week of January 31, 2000 Mr. Spector invited Mr. Kaufthiel and other members of the itract management to come to Puerto Rico and make a detailed presentation to Margo's board of directors. Mr. Spector also invited Mr. Stahler and Mr. Davis to attend the meeting. Mr. Kaufthiel accepted Mr. Spector's invitation and itract made a presentation of its business plan and projections to Margo's board of directors on February 7, 2000 in San Juan, Puerto Rico. Immediately following the meeting, Margo's board of directors held a special meeting and authorized Mr. Spector to negotiate and execute a non-binding letter of intent with itract. Negotiations between the parties continued during February 7 and February 8 and a non-binding letter of intent was executed in the evening of February 8, 2000. Under the terms of the letter of intent, the holders of membership units of itract are entitled to receive approximately 88% of the outstanding common stock of Margo following the merger. On February 10, 2000, Margo's board of directors voted to create a committee consisting of its independent board members to review the proposed transaction with itract. On March 9, 2000, Margo retained the services of the Schwartz Heslin Group, Inc., an independent investment banking firm, to render an opinion on the fairness of the proposed merger to Margo's shareholders from a financial point of view. In the weeks following the signing of the letter of intent, representatives of Margo and itract conducted due diligence investigations, studied the tax implications of the transaction and negotiated the terms of the merger agreement. On April 4, 2000, Margo's board of directors held a special meeting to review the recommendations of the special committee and the report made by the Schwartz Heslin Group, Inc. The board subsequently voted to approve the merger agreement, subject to such minor changes as management might deem advisable. Further negotiations ensued. As a result of such negotiations, the percentage ownership to be received by the members of itract was reduced from 88% to 86.8%. This reduction was based on Margo's understanding that certain amounts owed by itract to ICES and its affiliated entities reduced the value of itract. A special board meeting was held on April 11, 2000 to approve the final terms of the merger agreement. Margo's board of directors once again approved the agreement and the merger agreement was executed in the evening of April 11, 2000. Recommendations of Margo's Board of Directors and Reasons for the Transactions Margo's board of directors believes that the proposed transactions are fair to, and in the best interests of, Margo and its shareholders. Accordingly, Margo's board of directors has unanimously approved the merger agreement with Holdings and the purchase agreement with Empresas Margo, Inc. and recommends that Margo shareholders vote FOR the approval and adoption of those agreements and the transactions contemplated thereby. Margo's board of directors believes that the consummation of the transactions present an opportunity for Margo shareholders to participate in a growing sector of commerce and the economy--the Internet. In reaching its decision to approve the reincorporation merger and the sale of the existing nursery and other subsidiaries and recommend their approval to Margo's shareholders, Margo's board of directors consulted with Margo's management, as well as with its financial and legal advisors, and considered a variety of factors, including the following: o Market prices of its common stock over recent periods. o The business prospects of its existing nursery and related operations. o Margo's going concern value. o Margo's inability to obtain crop insurance for damage caused by hurricanes. o The future prospects of itract in the Internet marketing business, as contemplated by itract's business plan. 27
S-437th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 37th
o A review of possible alternatives, including continuing as a publicly or privately held corporation. o The written opinion of Schwartz Heslin Group, Inc. that, as of the date of such opinion and based upon and subject to certain matters stated in such opinion, the conversion ratio is fair, from a financial point of view, to Margo's shareholders. A copy of such opinion, which sets forth the assumptions made, matters considered and limitations on the review undertaken, is attached as Appendix D to this proxy statement/prospectus and is incorporated herein by reference. o The structure and terms of the merger agreement with itract. The above discussion of the information and factors considered by Margo's board of directors is not intended to be exhaustive, but includes all material factors considered by the board. In reaching its determination to approve and recommend the merger, Margo's board of directors did not assign any relative or specific weights to the foregoing factors, and individual directors may have given differing weights to different factors. Margo's board of directors unanimously recommends that Margo shareholders vote FOR adoption and approval of the merger agreement. Opinion of Financial Advisor Regarding Merger with itract Margo retained Schwartz Heslin Group, Inc. ("Schwartz Heslin") to act as its financial advisor to render a fairness opinion in connection with the itract merger, based on Schwartz Heslin's qualifications, expertise and reputation. On April 11, 2000, Scwartz Heslin rendered to Margo's board of directors its written opinion that, as of such date and based upon the considerations set forth in the opinion, the itract merger was fair from a financial point of view to the holders of the shares of Margo's common stock. The full text of the Scwartz Heslin opinion is attached as Appendix D to this proxy statement/prospectus. Margo's stockholders are urged to read the opinion carefully and in its entirety. The Schwartz Heslin opinion is directed to Margo's board of directors, addressed only the fairness of the itract merger transaction from a financial point of view to the holders of the shares of Margo common stock, and does not address any other aspect of the itract merger or constitute a recommendation to any of Margo's stockholders or the members of itract as to how such stockholders or members should vote on the merger. This summary is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of such opinion. Pursuant to an engagement agreement dated March 8, 2000, Schwartz Heslin was engaged by Margo's board of directors to render an opinion as to whether the itract merger was fair to the shareholders of Margo from a financial point of view. In rendering the opinion, it was Schwartz Heslin's understanding that the itract merger is the merger of a subsidiary of Holdings with itract whereby Holdings would acquire itract in an all stock transaction. In the reincorporation merger, Margo's existing common stock would be exchanged for shares of common stock of Holdings. itract's members would receive shares of Holdings common stock representing 86.8% of Holdings common stock after the itract merger (on a fully diluted basis). Schwartz Heslin is a firm that provides a broad range of financial consulting and advisory services. Schwartz Heslin has been engaged in a number of transactions to render valuation and fairness opinions for both private and public companies. Schwartz Heslin has previously not provided any financial advisory services to Margo or itract. For purposes of its opinion and in connection with its review of the itract merger, Schwartz Heslin reviewed and analyzed, among other things, the following: (a) the itract merger agreement; (b) the letter of intent, dated February 8, 2000; (c) itract's Business Plan, dated March 17, 2000; (d) certain internal information, financial and operational in nature (including projections prepared by management of itract and ICES) concerning the business and operations of itract; (e) the unaudited balance sheet and income statement of itract as of February 29, 2000; and (f) audited financial statements for Margo for the years ended December 31, 1999 and 1998. Schwartz Heslin considered such other information, financial studies, analyses, investigations and financial, economic and market criteria that it deemed relevant. Schwartz Heslin also had discussions with certain officers and employees of Margo and itract to review the foregoing as well as other matters it believed relevant to its analysis. 28
S-438th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 38th
In connection with its opinion, with Margo's permission and without any independent verification, Schwartz Heslin relied on the accuracy and completeness of all the financial and other information reviewed by it, furnished, or otherwise communicated to it by Margo or obtained by Schwartz Heslin from publicly available sources. Schwartz Heslin did not make an independent valuation or appraisal of the assets or liabilities of Margo and was not furnished with any such valuation or appraisal. Any inaccuracies in the information on which Schwartz Heslin relied could materially affect its opinion. In conjunction with rendering its written opinion dated April 11, 2000 to the board of directors of Margo, Schwartz Heslin presented a summary of its analysis to the Board on April 4, 2000. Set forth below is a brief summary of the analyses performed by Schwartz Heslin in reaching its April 11, 2000 opinion. Market Approach. Under this approach, Schwartz Heslin used three valuation methods: (1) the guideline company method, (2) the merger and acquisition method, and (3) the industry performance guideline method. Under the guideline company method, Schwartz Heslin selected six comparable companies and calculated median market multiples based on the ratio of market value to revenues, earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization ("EBITDA") and net income. Applying these multiples to itract's forecasted values produced a potential value for itract of $119 million. The comparable public companies were: Clickaction, Inc., Doubleclick, Inc., Siebel Systems, Inc., Digital Impact, Inc., Exactis.com, Inc., and 24/7 Media, Inc. Under the merger and acquisition method, Schwartz Heslin determined price multiples for selected similar businesses that have recently been sold. The price multiples used were price to total assets, price to equity and price to revenue for each of three projected years, weighted more for the first year. The median multiples calculated were applied to the projected itract values. Each multiple was also weighted based on observations of current Internet company valuations. The application of this method produced a potential value for itract of $43 million. Under the industry performance guideline method, industry multiples were selected for similar businesses that have publicly available financial information. The price multiples used were price to total assets, price to equity and price to revenue for each of three projected years (weighted more for the first year). The median multiples calculated were applied to the projected itract values. Each multiple was also weighted based on observations of current Internet company valuations. The application of this method produced a potential value for itract of $90.5 million. Income Approach. Under the income approach, Schwartz Heslin performed a discounted cash flow analysis of itract based on the forecasted information provided by itract's management. The projected cash flows were discounted to present values using a discount rate of 33.41%, which reflect different assumptions regarding the required rates of return of holders and prospective buyers of Holdings common stock. The application of this method produced a potential value for itract of $41 million. Implied Market Value. Schwartz Heslin considered the public market's reaction to the announcement of the itract merger. The publicly traded stock of Margo rose substantially after the announcement of the itract merger, indicating that the market views the itract merger favorably. The price of Margo's common stock increased from $5.75 per share immediately prior to the announcement to $35 per share shortly after the announcement, and closed at $17 per share on February 9, 2000, the day of the announcement. The stock price has fluctuated between approximately $11 and $30 per share from February 10, 2000 to March 31, 2000, on relatively low volume. The volatility in the stock price tends to indicate that trading in Margo's common stock is being done in a highly speculative manner with respect to the value of itract. Nevertheless, the trading prices for Margo's common stock provides an indication of the perceived value 29
S-439th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 39th
of itract, although not necessarily its fair value. Using these trading values and applying a discount factor, after taking into consideration the dilution to Margo's shareholders as a result of the itract merger, provides a potential value for itract of $38 million. No company or transaction used in the above analyses is identical to Margo, itract or the itract merger. Accordingly, an analysis of the results of the foregoing is not mathematical; rather, it involves complex considerations and judgments concerning differences in financial and operating characteristics of the companies and other facts that could affect the public trading value of the companies to which they are being compared. The material analyses performed by Schwartz Heslin have been summarized above. Nonetheless, the summary set forth above does not purport to be a complete description of the analyses performed by Schwartz Heslin. The preparation of a fairness opinion involves various determinations as to the most appropriate and relevant methods of financial analysis and the application of these methods to the particular circumstances. Therefore, such an opinion is not readily susceptible to a summary description. Schwartz Heslin did not form a conclusion as to whether any individual analysis, considered in isolation, supported or failed to support an opinion as to fairness. Rather, in reaching its conclusion, Schwartz Heslin considered the results of the analyses in light of each other and ultimately reached its opinion based on the results of all analyses taken as a whole. Schwartz Heslin did not place a particular reliance or weight on any particular analysis, but instead concluded that its analyses, taken as whole, supported its determination. In performing its analyses, Schwartz Heslin made numerous assumptions with respect to itract's performance, general business and economic conditions and other matters. The analyses performed by Schwartz Heslin are not necessarily indicative of future actual values or future results, which may be significantly more or less favorable than suggested by such analyses. The analyses do not purport to be appraisals or to reflect prices at which a company might actually be sold or the prices at which any securities may trade at the present time or at any time in the future. Schwartz Heslin used in its analyses various projections of future performance prepared by the management of itract. The projections were based on numerous variables and assumptions which are inherently unpredictable and must be considered not certain of occurrence as projected. Accordingly, actual results could vary significantly from those assumed in the projections and any related analyses. Schwartz Heslin has not expressed an opinion or given any form of assurance for the underlying data presented in their opinion and/or their valuation report nor has Schwartz Heslin expressed any opinion or given any form of assurance that itract can achieve its business plan. Furthermore, Schwartz Heslin's opinion does not address the relative merits of the itract merger as compared to any alternative business strategies that might exist for Margo or the effect of any other business combination in which Margo might engage. Pursuant to the terms of Schwartz Heslin's engagement, Margo has agreed to pay Schwartz Heslin for its financial advisory services in connection with the fairness opinion an aggregate fee of $25,000. Margo also has agreed to reimburse Schwartz Heslin for reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred by it in performing its services, including fees and expenses for legal counsel and other advisors, and to indemnify Schwartz Heslin and certain related persons and entities against certain liabilities, including liabilities under the federal securities laws, arising out of Schwartz Heslin's engagement. Terms of the Merger Agreement with Holdings This section of the proxy statement/prospectus describes material provisions of the merger agreement with Holdings. The description of the merger agreement contained in this proxy statement/prospectus does not purport to be complete. For a complete understanding of the terms and conditions of the merger agreement, all of Margo's shareholders are urged to read the entire merger agreement, attached as Appendix A to this proxy statement/prospectus carefully and in its entirety. General Holdings, a corporation organized under the laws of the State of Delaware, was established to accomplish the reincorporation of Margo in Delaware pursuant to the proposed merger of Margo and Holdings. As a result of the reincorporation merger, all current Margo shareholders will have the same equity interest in Holdings as they now 30
S-440th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 40th
have in Margo. However, upon consummation of the merger with itract, Margo shareholders will own, on a fully diluted basis, 13.2% of the outstanding common stock of Holdings. Prior to the consummation of the proposed reincorporation merger, Margo will have sold its nursery and other subsidiaries pursuant to the stock purchase agreement with Empresas Margo, Inc. See, "Sale of Business" below. Upon consummation of the proposed reincorporation, Margo will be merged with and into Holdings, with Holdings being the surviving corporation of such merger. All holders of Margo common stock will become holders, on a share-for-share basis, of shares of common stock of Holdings having the same rights with respect to Holdings as their shares of Margo common stock now have with respect to Margo. Holdings will succeed to all rights, assets, liabilities and obligations of Margo. The closing of the reincorporation merger would occur immediately prior to the closing of the merger with itract. Purpose The reason for the reincorporation of Margo as a Delaware corporation is that it allows the merger with itract, as discussed below, to qualify as a tax-free exchange for most of the members of itract for federal income tax purposes. Also, Delaware is one of the preferred jurisdictions for public companies because of its established body of corporate law. Thus, Margo and itract believe that being a Delaware corporation will help Holdings' ability to obtain debt and equity financing in the future. Conversion of Shares Pursuant to the terms and conditions of the merger agreement, each share of Margo common stock, $0.001 par value, which is outstanding immediately prior to the merger will be converted into one share of common stock, $0.001 par value, of Holdings having the same rights, powers, qualifications, limitations and restrictions with respect to Holdings as the Margo common stock presently has with regard to Margo. It will not be necessary for shareholders to surrender their certificates. Certificates representing Margo common stock will be deemed to be certificates for an equal number of shares of Holdings common stock. After the merger, certificates that previously represented Margo common stock will be replaced by certificates representing Holdings common stock when submitted to the transfer agent with a request that they be so replaced or when presented for transfer. If any certificate is to be reissued in a name other than that in which the certificate surrendered is registered, the person requesting such exchange shall pay any transfer or other taxes incident thereto. Conditions of Merger Consummation of the merger with Holdings is subject to fulfillment, on or before the effective time of the merger, of the following conditions: (1) approval by the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of Margo common stock, (2) satisfaction of all conditions to the consummation of the merger with itract, as discussed below, and (3) receipt of a ruling from the Puerto Rico Treasury Department and an opinion of counsel from Pietrantoni Mendez & Alvarez LLP to the effect that the merger constitutes a tax-free reorganization under the Puerto Rico Internal Revenue Code of 1994, as amended. Termination At any time prior to the consummation of the reincorporation merger, the merger agreement may be terminated and the merger abandoned by the board of directors of Margo. The board of directors would abandon the merger if the conditions set forth above are not satisfied. Stock Options All options to purchase Margo common stock outstanding as of the effective time of the reincorporation merger shall, by virtue of such merger and without any further action on the part of Margo or the holders of such options, 31
S-441st Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 41st
be converted into the options to acquire the same number of shares of Holdings common stock and for the same exercise price. Dissenters' Rights of Appraisal Pursuant to Section 10.12 of the Puerto Rico General Corporations Law of 1995 ("PRGCL"), the holder of record of any shares of Margo common stock who does not vote such holder's shares in favor of adoption and approval of the merger agreement with Holdings may assert appraisal rights and elect to have the "fair value" of such holder's shares of Margo common stock determined and paid to such holder, provided that such holder complies with the requirements of Section 10.12 of the PRGCL, summarized below. All references to and summaries of the rights of Margo dissenting shareholders are qualified in their entirety by reference to the text of Section 10.12 of the PRGCL which is attached to this proxy statement/prospectus as Appendix F. Any shareholder entitled to vote on the merger who desires that Margo purchase the shares of Margo common stock held by such shareholder (the "dissenting shares") must not vote in favor of adoption and approval of the reincorporation merger. Shares of Margo common stock voted in favor of adoption and approval of the reincorporation merger will be disqualified as dissenting shares. Shareholders whose shares are not voted in favor of adoption and approval of the reincorporation merger and who, in all other respects, follow the procedures specified in Section 10.12 of the PRGCL, will be entitled to have their Margo common stock appraised by the Puerto Rico Court of First Instance (the "Court") and to receive payment of the "fair value" of such shares, exclusive of any element of value arising from the accomplishment or expectation of the merger, as determined by the Court. The procedures set forth in Section 10.12 of the PRGCL must be strictly complied with. Failure to follow any such procedures will result in a termination or waiver of the shareholders' appraisal rights under Section 10.12 of the PRGCL. Under Section 10.12 of the PRGCL, a holder of Margo common stock electing to exercise appraisal rights must: 1. Deliver to Margo, before taking of the vote on the merger, a written demand for appraisal of such holder's Margo common stock which reasonably informs Margo of the identity of the shareholder of record and that such record shareholder intends to demand appraisal of such holder's shares. Such written demand is in addition to and separate from any consent or vote with respect to the reincorporation merger. Neither a vote against, nor abstention from voting with respect to the reincorporation merger, nor a failure to consent to the merger, will satisfy the requirement that a written demand for appraisal be delivered to Margo before the vote on the merger. Such written demand for appraisal should be delivered either in person to the Secretary of Margo, or by mail to Road 690, Kilometer 5.8, Vega Alta, Puerto Rico 00692, Attention: Secretary of Margo, prior to _______, 2000; and 2. Not vote in favor of, or consent in writing to, the reincorporation merger. A failure to vote against the merger, or not respond to a request for written consent, will not constitute a waiver of appraisal rights. The written demand for appraisal must be made by or for the holder of record of shares of Margo common stock. Accordingly, such demand must be executed by or for such shareholder of record, fully and correctly, as such shareholder's name appears on the stock certificates representing the shares. If the applicable shares are owned of record in a fiduciary capacity, such as by a trustee, guardian or custodian, execution of the demand should be made in such capacity, and if the applicable shares are owned of record by more than one person, as in a joint tenancy or tenancy in common, such demand should be executed by or for all joint owners. An authorized agent, including one of two or more joint owners, may execute the demand for appraisal for a shareholder of record. However, the agent must identify the record owner(s) and expressly disclose the fact that, in executing the demand, the agent is acting as agent for the record owner(s). A record owner, such as a broker, who holds shares as nominee for other persons may exercise appraisal rights with respect to the shares held for all or less than all of such other persons. In such case, the written demand should 32
S-442nd Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 42nd
set forth the number of shares covered by it. Where no number of shares is expressly mentioned, the demand will be presumed to cover all of the shares outstanding in the name of such record owner. Within 10 days after the effective time of the merger, Margo is required to, and will, notify each shareholder who has satisfied the foregoing conditions of the date on which the effective time occurred and that appraisal rights are available with respect to shares for which a demand has been submitted. Within 120 days after the effective time, Margo, or any such shareholder who has satisfied the foregoing conditions and otherwise is entitled to appraisal rights under Section 10.12 of the PRGCL, may file a petition in the Court demanding a determination of the value of the shares held by all shareholders entitled to appraisal rights. If no such petition is filed, appraisal rights will be lost for all shareholders who previously had demanded appraisal of their shares. Shareholders of Margo seeking to exercise appraisal rights should not assume that Margo will file a petition with respect to the appraisal of the value of their shares or that Margo will initiate any negotiations with respect to the "fair value" of such shares. Accordingly, such shareholders should regard it as their obligation to take all steps necessary to perfect their appraisal rights in the manner prescribed in Section 10.12 of the PRGCL. Within 120 days after the date of the effective time, any shareholder who has complied with the applicable provisions of Section 10.12 of the PRGCL will be entitled, upon written request, to receive from Margo a statement setting forth the aggregate number of shares not voted in favor of the reincorporation merger and with respect to which demands for appraisal were received by Margo, and the number of holders of such shares. Such statement must be mailed within 10 days after the written request therefor has been received by Margo or within 10 days after expiration of the period for delivery of demands for appraisal, whichever is later. If a petition for an appraisal is timely filed, at the hearing on such petition the Court will determine the shareholders of Margo entitled to appraisal rights. After determining the shareholders entitled to an appraisal, the Court will appraise the value of the shares of Margo common stock owned by such shareholders, determining the "fair value" of such shares exclusive of any element of value arising from the accomplishment or expectation of the reincorporation merger and the transactions described herein. The Court will direct payment by Margo of the fair value of such shares together with a fair rate of interest, if any, on such fair value to shareholders entitled thereto upon surrender to Margo of stock certificates. The costs of the proceeding may be determined by the Court and taxed upon the parties as the Court deems equitable in the circumstances. Upon application of a shareholder, the Court may, in its discretion, order that all or a portion of the expenses incurred by any shareholder in connection with an appraisal proceeding, including, without limitation, reasonable attorneys' fees and fees and expenses of experts, be charged pro rata against the value of all the shares entitled to appraisal. Although Margo believes that the merger is fair, no representation is made as to the outcome of the appraisal of fair value as determined by the Court, and shareholders should recognize that such appraisal could result in a determination of a value higher or lower than, or the same as, the consideration to be received in the merger. Moreover, Margo does not presently anticipate offering cash consideration in excess of the fair market value of such merger consideration (calculated as of the completion of the merger) to any shareholder exercising appraisal rights, and reserves the right to assert, in any appraisal proceeding, that, for purposes of Section 10.12 of the PRGCL the "fair value" of a share of Margo common stock is less than the fair market value of such merger consideration (calculated as of the completion of the merger) that would otherwise be received by such shareholder. In determining the "fair value" of shares of Margo common stock, the Court is required to take into account all relevant factors. Therefore, such determination could be based upon considerations other than, or in addition to, the price paid for shares and the asset value of shares of Margo common stock, including, without limitation, the market value of shares and the asset values and earning capacity of Margo. Section 10.12 of the PRGCL provides that "fair value" is to be "exclusive of any element of value arising from the accomplishment or expectation of the merger." Any holder of shares of Margo common stock who has demanded an appraisal in compliance with Section 10.12 of the PRGCL will not, after the effective time of the merger, be entitled to vote such holder's shares for any purpose nor be entitled to the payment of dividends or other distributions on such shares other than those payable to shareholders of record as of a date prior to the effective time of the merger. 33
S-443rd Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 43rd
If no petition for an appraisal is filed within 120 days after the date of the effective time, or if a holder of shares delivers to Margo a written withdrawal of such holder's demand for an appraisal and an acceptance of the merger either within 60 days after the effective time or with the written approval of Margo after such period, then the right of such shareholder to an appraisal will cease and such shareholder will receive the merger consideration for their Margo shares and become a shareholder of Holdings. Margo reserves the right to give or withhold such written approval in its sole discretion. No appraisal proceeding in the Court will be dismissed as to any shareholder without the approval of the Court, which approval may be conditioned on such terms as the Court deems just. Federal and Puerto Rico Income and Other Tax Consequences of the Reincorporation Merger The following discussion summarizes certain Federal and Puerto Rico tax aspects of the proposed reincorporation merger. This discussion is based on the United States Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code"), the Puerto Rico Internal Revenue Code of 1994, as amended (the "PR Code") and the Puerto Rico Municipal Property Tax Act of 1991, as amended (the "MPTA"), all as in effect on the date of this proxy statement. Some portions of the discussion are based on the assumption that (1) at the time of the reincorporation merger the fair market value of Holdings common stock would be approximately equal to the fair market value of Margo common stock surrendered pursuant thereto, (2) at the time of the reincorporation merger there is no plan or intention by the shareholders of Margo to sell, exchange, or otherwise dispose of any shares of Holdings received in the reincorporation merger that would reduce the Margo shareholders' ownership of Holdings common stock to a number of shares having a value, as of the date of the reincorporation merger of less than 50% of the value of all of the formerly outstanding common stock of Margo (including Margo shares held by dissenters and Margo shares redeemed prior to the reincorporation merger) as of the date of the reincorporation merger, (3) there is no plan or intention to have Holdings reacquire any of its common stock issued in the reincorporation merger, (4) the liabilities of Margo assumed by Holdings, plus the liabilities, if any, to which the assets are subject, were incurred by Margo in the ordinary course of its business, (5) the fair market value of the assets of Margo transferred to Holdings will equal or exceed the sum of the liabilities assumed by Holdings, plus the amount of liabilities, if any, to which-the transferred assets are subject, (6) following the reincorporation merger, Holdings would continue to conduct a business and, (7) Margo, its shareholders and Holdings would pay their respective expenses, if any, incurred in connection with the reincorporation merger. This discussion does not address all aspects of Federal and Puerto Rico taxation that may be relevant to a holder of Margo or Holdings common stock in light of that shareholder's particular circumstances or to a shareholder subject to special rules such as: (1) an individual shareholder that is not a citizen of the United States; (2) a financial institution or insurance company; (3) a tax-exempt organization; (4) a dealer or broker in securities; or (5) a shareholder that holds Margo or Holdings common stock or that acquired Margo or Holdings common stock pursuant to the exercise of options or otherwise as compensation. Margo strongly urges each holder of Margo common stock to consult his or her tax advisor to determine the Federal and Puerto Rico tax consequences of the merger that may be applicable to the particular shareholder. Federal Income Tax Consequences Margo For purposes of the Code, the reincorporation merger would be treated as a taxable sale by Margo of each of its appreciated tangible and intangible assets to Holdings in exchange for Holdings common stock and a distribution by Margo to its shareholders of Holdings' common stock. Since at the effective time of the reincorporation merger Margo will be considered a foreign corporation that is not engaged in a United States trade or business under the Code, Margo will not be subject to Federal income tax on such a gain. 34
S-444th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 44th
Holdings Holdings would not be required to recognize any gain or loss on the receipt of Margo's tangible and intangible assets in exchange for Holdings common stock. The Shareholders The reincorporation merger would be treated as a taxable exchange for federal income tax purposes by a shareholder of Margo common stock for Holdings' common stock. Thus, Margo shareholders would generally be required to recognize a gain or loss on the exchange of the Margo common stock for Holdings' common stock under the Code measured by the difference as of the effective time of the reincorporation merger between the fair market value of Holdings' common stock received and the holder's tax basis in the Margo common stock. Holders of Margo common stock that are corporations organized under the laws of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, would be subject to federal income tax on gains derived from the exchange of Margo common stock for Holdings' common stock only if the gain is effectively connected to a U.S. trade or business carried on by such corporation. Gains, if any, from exchange of the Margo's common stock for Holdings' common stock by individuals who are bona fide residents of Puerto Rico during the entire taxable year generally is treated as Puerto Rico source income and therefore excluded from U.S. Federal income taxation if the Puerto Rico resident pays a Puerto Rico income tax at an effective rate of at least 10% on the gain. Because such gain is subject to tax in Puerto Rico at progressive rates that generally exceed 10%, in many cases it will be excluded from U.S. taxation under this rule. However, a resident of Puerto Rico who is not subject to a 10% tax on gain from the sale of such holder's Margo common stock nevertheless may treat the gain as Puerto Rico source income not subject to U.S. Federal income tax if the requirements of Notice 89-40 are met. The Code provisions governing the source of the gain authorizes the Secretary of the Treasury to issue regulations making the 10% tax requirement inapplicable to bona fide residents of Puerto Rico. In Notice 89-40, the IRS announced that regulations would be issued that would provide that gain from the sale of stock individuals who had been bona fide residents of Puerto Rico for the entire taxable year would be Puerto Rico source, and therefore excluded from U.S. Federal income taxation, whether or not the individual paid a 10% on the gain to Puerto Rico. Unless contrary authority is issued, an individual resident of Puerto Rico who meets the conditions described in the notice may treat a gain from the exchange of the Margo common stock for Holdings' common stock as Puerto Rico source income. Dividends Paid by Holdings Dividends paid by Holdings out of its earnings and profits to its shareholders would constitute ordinary gross income for purposes of the Code. Sale or Exchange of Holdings' common stock Holders of Holdings' common stock would be required to recognize a gain or loss on the sale, exchange or other disposition of Holdings' common stock for federal income tax purposes under the Code. Corporations organized under the laws of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico would be subject to U.S. Federal income tax on gains derived from the sale, exchange or other disposition of Holdings' common stock only if the gain is effectively connected to a U.S. trade or business carried on by such corporation. Gains, if any, from the sale, exchange or other disposition of the Holdings' common stock by individuals who are bona fide residents of Puerto Rico during the entire taxable year generally are treated as Puerto Rico source income and, therefore, excluded from U.S. taxation if the Puerto Rico resident pays a Puerto Rico income tax at an effective rate of at least 10% on the gain. Because such gain is subject to tax in Puerto Rico at progressive rates that generally exceed 10%, in many cases it will be excluded from U.S. taxation under this rule. However, a resident of Puerto Rico who is not subject to a 10% tax on gain from the sale of such holder's Margo common stock 35
S-445th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 45th
nevertheless may treat the gain as Puerto Rico source income not subject to federal income tax if the requirements of Notice 89-40 are met. The Code provisions governing the source of the gain authorize the Secretary of the Treasury to issue regulations making the 10% tax requirement inapplicable to bona fide residents of Puerto Rico. In Notice 89-40, the IRS announced that regulations would be issued that would provide that gain from the sale of stock by individuals who had been bona fide residents of Puerto Rico for the entire taxable year would be Puerto Rico source income, and therefore excluded from U.S. Federal income taxation, whether or not the individual paid a 10% on the gain to Puerto Rico. Unless contrary authority is issued, an individual resident of Puerto Rico who meets the conditions described in the notice may treat a gain from the sale, exchange or other disposition of the Holdings' common stock as Puerto Rico source income under the Code. United States Estate and Gift Taxes The transfer by death or gift of Holdings' common stock is generally subject to federal estate and gift taxes under the Code. Puerto Rico Tax Consequences Income Tax Margo, Holdings' and the Shareholders Margo understands that the reincorporation merger would constitute a tax-free reorganization for purposes of the PR Code. Under these circumstances: 1. no gain or loss would be recognized by Margo upon the transfer of its tangible and intangible assets to Holdings in exchange for Holdings' common stock; 2. no gain or loss would be recognized by Margo upon the distribution to its shareholders of Holdings' common stock; 3. no gain or loss would be recognized by Holdings upon receiving Margo's tangible and intangible assets in exchange for Holdings' common stock; and 4. Margo's shareholders would not recognize gain of loss upon the deemed exchange of Margo common stock for Holdings' common stock. Furthermore, shareholder's basis in Holdings' common stock received in the reincorporation merger would be the same basis as such holder had in shares of Margo common stock and the holding period of Holdings' common stock received by each shareholder would include the holding period of the common stock of Margo held by such shareholder immediately prior to the reincorporation merger. Margo has requested a ruling from the Puerto Rico Department of Treasury to the effect that the reincorporation merger constitutes a tax-free reorganization under the PR Code. The administrative practice of the Puerto Rico Department of Treasury is to require as a condition of issuing this ruling that Margo be deemed to distribute a dividend of its current and accumulated earnings and profits to its shareholders. To this date, the Puerto Rico Department of the Treasury has not issued this ruling and no assurance can be given that the ruling will in fact be issued. The receipt of the ruling confirming the tax-free reorganization treatment of the reincorporation merger is a condition to the closing of the itract merger. A gain realized by a dissenting shareholder on account of surrendering Margo stock pursuant to the exercise of dissenter rights will generally be subject to Puerto Rico income taxes. In the case of a gain realized by a dissenting shareholder not described in the preceding paragraph, such gain will be subject to Puerto Rico income tax (and in certain circumstances a tax to be withheld at source of up to 36
S-446th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 46th
25% of the consideration received will be imposed) only if (1) in the case of an individual citizen of the United States, such gain is treated as income derived from sources within Puerto Rico, or (2) in the case of a foreign corporation or partnership or non-resident alien individual, such gain is income from sources within Puerto Rico or is effectively connected with a trade or business in Puerto Rico. To the extent such gain is subject to Puerto Rico income tax, a dissenting shareholder that is also subject to Federal income tax on the gain may not be able to claim the Puerto Rico income tax imposed thereon against the applicable Federal income tax. Dividends Paid by Holdings The shareholders of Holdings that are individuals and residents of Puerto Rico and corporations or partnerships organized pursuant to the laws of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico will be subject to a Puerto Rico income tax as ordinary income on the total amount of dividends distributed by Holdings from its earnings and profits. Sale or Exchange of Holdings' common stock Any gain realized by a shareholder of Holdings from the sale, exchange or redemption of Holdings' common stock will not be subject to the Puerto Rico income tax under the PR Code if the gain is income from sources outside of Puerto Rico and such shareholder (1) is an individual citizen of the United States and not a resident of Puerto Rico, (2) an individual not a citizen of the United States and not engaged in a trade or business in Puerto Rico, or (3) a corporation or partnership organized under the laws of a country other than Puerto Rico and not engaged in a trade or business in Puerto Rico. Any gain to be recognized by a shareholder of Holdings from the sale or exchange of Holdings' common stock will constitute income from sources within Puerto Rico if title to and beneficial ownership of the stock is transferred in Puerto Rico. Any gain realized by a Holdings shareholder on account of a redemption of Holdings' common stock will constitute income from sources within Puerto Rico. Property Tax Consequences Under the MPTA Under the MPTA, Holdings' common stock would not be subject to personal property taxes. Puerto Rico Estate and Gift Taxes The transfer by death or gift of Holdings' common stock by an individual resident of Puerto Rico would be subject to Puerto Rico estate or gift taxes under the PR Code. Terms of the Merger Agreement with itract This section of the proxy statement/prospectus describes material provisions of the merger agreement with itract. The description of the merger agreement contained in this proxy statement/prospectus does not purport to be complete. For a complete understanding of the terms and conditions of the merger agreement, you are urged to read the merger agreement, attached as Appendix B to this proxy statement/prospectus carefully and in its entirety. Closing; Effective Time The closing of the merger will take place at the offices of Kronish Lieb Weiner & Hellman LLP, 1114 Avenue of the Americas, New York, New York, on the fifth business day after satisfaction or waiver of all of the conditions set forth in the merger agreement, unless another time or date is agreed to by Holdings and itract. Subject to the provisions of the merger agreement, on the closing date, Holdings and itract will file a certificate of merger or other appropriate documents with the Secretary of State of Delaware in accordance with the relevant provisions of the Delaware corporations statutes, as a result of which iTract Acquisition Company, LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of Holdings, will merge with and into itract and itract will become a wholly owned subsidiary of Holdings. The merger will become effective at such time as the certificate of merger is duly filed with the Secretary of State of Delaware. 37
S-447th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 47th
The Merger Consideration Each member of itract will be entitled to receive at the effective time of the merger a pro rata share of the "Merger Consideration", rounded to the nearest whole number, based on the proportion that the itract units held by that member immediately prior to the merger bears to the total number of issued and outstanding itract units at the time of the merger. The "Merger Consideration" is the number of shares of common stock of Holdings equal to the difference between the "Maximum itract Shares" and the number of shares of Holdings that will be subject to options and warrants to acquire shares of Holdings' common stock issued to the current holders of options and warrants of itract in connection with the merger. As of the date of this proxy statement/prospectus, there are 453,500 membership units subject to outstanding warrants of itract and 127,500 shares subject to outstanding options of Margo. There are no outstanding warrants or other convertible securities of Margo. The "Maximum itract Shares" will be determined by the following formula: Margo common stock + Margo common stock underlying outstanding outstanding options 0.868 x ------------------------------------------------------------ 0.132 This means that Margo anticipates exchanging 12,680,057 shares of Holdings common stock for the itract membership units exchanged in the merger, with up to an additional 536,045 shares being available upon exercise of the outstanding warrant issued by itract to InfoSpace. See "Information About itract-itract's Business-Marketing." Accordingly, on a fully diluted basis assuming exercise of all outstanding options and warrants, Holdings common stock received by the itract members in the merger will represent 86.8% of the outstanding Holdings common stock immediately after the merger. Cancellation of itract Units; Fractional Shares At the effective time of the itract merger, all outstanding itract membership units will automatically be cancelled and holders of such units will be entitled to receive, as soon as is practicable, certificates representing shares of Holdings' common stock. No certificates representing fractional shares of Holdings' common stock will be issued upon the surrender of the itract membership units. Representations and Warranties Each of itract, Holdings, iTract Acquisition Company, LLC ("iTract Acquisition Sub") and Margo have made certain customary representations and warranties in the merger agreement relating to, among other things: o its organization and the organization of its subsidiaries, when applicable; o its capital structure; o the authorization, execution, delivery and enforceability of the merger agreement and related matters; o the absence of conflicts under its charter, bylaws and material agreements; o material contracts; o litigation; o taxes and tax returns; o employee benefit plans; o compliance with applicable laws; 38
S-448th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 48th
o title to assets and properties; o the accuracy of information supplied by it contained in this proxy statement/prospectus; o its business activities; o its financial statements and the accuracy of the information contained therein; o the absence of certain material changes and events; o the accuracy of books, records, accounts and internal accounting controls; o broker's and finder's fees; o insurance; o labor matters and relations; o employees; o intellectual property and software; and o business locations. The merger agreement also contains representations and warranties of Margo relating to: o registration of its securities and filing of documents with the SEC; and o listing of its securities on the Nasdaq SmallCap Market. Certain Covenants Margo's, Holdings' and iTract Acquisition Sub's Conduct of Business Prior to the Merger. Margo and Holdings (following the reincorporation merger) have agreed that, until the earlier of the termination of the itract merger agreement or the effective time of the itract merger, they will conduct their business in the ordinary course. Each of Margo, Holdings and iTract Acquisition Sub have also agreed not to: o amend its articles or certificate of incorporation or bylaws (except to include certain indemnification provisions); o organize any subsidiary or acquire any capital stock or other equity securities of any person or any equity or ownership interest in any business; o incur any debt or liabilities of any kind other than in the ordinary course of business or in furtherance of the merger with itract and the transactions contemplated thereby; o grant or extend any power of attorney other than in the ordinary course of business which does not affect a material part of Margo's business; o fail to keep in full force and effect insurance comparable in amount and scope of coverage to insurance now carried by it; o (1) split, combine or reclassify its outstanding capital stock or declare, set aside or pay any dividend or distribution payable in cash, stock, property or otherwise, (2) spin-off any assets or businesses, sell any 39
S-449th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 49th
assets or businesses or effect any extraordinary corporate transaction (excluding the sale of the nursery and other subsidiaries to Empresas Margo, Inc.), in which Margo or Holdings, as the case may be, retains all of the proceeds from such sale, (3) engage in any transaction for the purpose of effecting a recapitalization, or (4) engage in any transaction or series of related transactions which has a similar effect to any of the foregoing; o sell, pledge or dispose of, or agree to issue, sell, pledge or dispose of, any additional shares of, or any options, warrants or rights of any kind to acquire any shares of its capital stock of any class, or any debt or equity securities convertible into or exchangeable for such capital stock or amend or modify the terms and conditions of any of the foregoing, provided, however, that Margo may issue shares upon exercise of outstanding options; o (1) redeem, purchase, acquire or offer to purchase or acquire any shares of its capital stock, other than as required by the governing terms of such securities, (2) take any action which would jeopardize the treatment of the itract merger as a tax-free exchange within the meaning of Section 351 of the Internal Revenue Code, and (3) make any acquisition of any assets or businesses (other than purchases of assets in the ordinary course of business); o fail to promptly advise itract in writing of any material adverse effect with respect to Margo, Holdings or any of their subsidiaries; or o agree or otherwise commit, whether in writing or otherwise, to do, or take any action or omit to take any action that would result in, a breach or violation of any of the foregoing. itract's Conduct of Business Prior to the Merger. itract has agreed that, until the earlier of the termination of the merger agreement or the effective time of the itract merger, it will conduct its business in the ordinary course and in the manner currently conducted and proposed to be conducted. In addition, itract has agreed not to: o amend its certificate of formation in an adverse manner; o organize any subsidiary or acquire any capital stock or other equity securities of any person or any equity or ownership interest in any business; o incur any debt or liabilities of any kind other than in the ordinary course of business or in furtherance of the proposed merger and the transactions contemplated thereby; o grant or extend any power of attorney other than in the ordinary course of business which does not affect the material part of its business; o fail to keep in full force and effect insurance comparable in amount and scope of coverage to insurance now carried by it; o split, combine or reclassify its outstanding membership interests or declare, certify or pay any dividend or distribution payable in cash, stock, property or otherwise, spin off any assets or business, sell any assets or business, effect any extraordinary corporate transaction in which it retains all the proceeds from such sale, engage in any transaction for the purpose of effecting any recapitalization or engage in any transaction or series of related transactions which have a similar effect on any of the foregoing; o sell, pledge, dispose of or agree to issue, sell or dispose of any additional interests or any options, warrants or rights of any kind, to acquire any interest in other securities, or any debt or securities convertible into or exchangeable for such membership interests or modify or amend the terms and conditions of any of the foregoing, provided, however, that itract may issue interests upon exercise of outstanding options, and provided further itract may issue additional options and additional units if such options and units shall be converted into options or common stock of Holdings at the effective time of the merger; 40
S-450th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 50th
o redeem, purchase, acquire or offer to purchase or acquire any interests other than as required by certain agreements, o make any acquisition of any assets or businesses other than purchases of assets in the ordinary course of business; o fail to promptly advise Margo and Holdings in writing of any material adverse effect with respect to itract; o take any action which would jeopardize the treatment of the merger as a tax-free exchange within the meaning of Section 351 of the Internal Revenue Code; or o agree or otherwise commit, whether in writing or otherwise, to do, or take any action or omit to take any action that would result in, a breach or violation of any of the foregoing. No Solicitation Each of Margo, Holdings, itract and iTract Acquisition Sub has agreed that, prior to the earlier of the termination or effective time of the itract merger, it will not solicit, initiate or encourage any inquiries, proposals or offers from any person relating to any business combination with respect to itract, Margo or Holdings or any sale of a material portion of its assets and/or capital stock, other than with respect to the sale of Margo's nursery and other subsidiaries. Conditions to the Consummation of the Merger The respective obligations of Margo, Holdings and iTract Acquisition Sub to consummate the itract merger are subject to the satisfaction or waiver of several conditions, including: o the shareholders of Margo shall have approved and adopted the reincorporation merger agreement with Holdings and the sale of the nursery operations and other businesses; o Margo shall have received the fairness opinion of Schwartz, Heslin Group, Inc. that the merger with itract is fair, from a financial point of view, to Margo's shareholders; o Margo shall have received the fairness opinion of San Juan Holdings, Inc. that the sale of the nursery operations and other operating businesses is fair, from a financial point of view, to Margo's shareholders; o the Registration Statement on Form S-4 of which this proxy statement/prospectus is a part, shall have become effective and no stop order suspending such effectiveness shall be in effect; o no injunction, order or decree of any federal or state court or administrative or governmental body which prevents consummation of the merger shall be in effect; o the shares of Holdings shall be listed on the Nasdaq SmallCap Market; o Margo shall have received a ruling from the Puerto Rico Treasury Department confirming that the reincorporation merger qualifies as a tax-free reorganization under the Puerto Rico Internal Revenue Code of 1994; o evidence that the loans made by Michael J. Spector and J. Morton Davis to ICES in the aggregate principal amount of $2,000,000 shall be repaid, with interest thereon, immediately following the merger; 41
S-451st Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 51st
o each member of itract receiving shares in Holdings and each holder of options in itract shall have executed lock-up agreements pursuant to which each such person agrees not to dispose of their shares until eight months after the effective time of the merger; o the delivery of an indemnification agreement by ICES with respect to the ownership by itract of certain intellectual property free of any encumbrances. Except as may be waived by itract, the obligation of itract to consummate the merger is also subject to satisfaction of several conditions, including: o the representations and warranties of Margo, Holdings and iTract Acquisition Sub contained in the merger agreement shall be true and correct in all material respects as of the closing date of the merger, and Margo, Holdings and iTract Acquisition Sub shall have performed in all material respects their obligations under the merger agreement as of the closing date; o Margo shall have merged with and into Holdings; o the sale of the nursery and other subsidiaries shall have been consummated; o at the effective time of the merger, Holdings shall have a cash and cash equivalents of not less than $5,000,000 and not be subject to liabilities exceeding $10,000 in the aggregate; o the Holdings common stock shall be listed on the Nasdaq SmallCap Market; o each director, officer and employee of Holdings and iTract Acquisition Sub shall resign effective as of the effective time of the merger and the resigning directors of Holdings shall have appointed as their successors the persons designated by itract; o each holder of 5% or more of Holdings' common stock immediately prior to the merger shall have executed a lock-up agreement pursuant to which it agrees not to dispose of such shares until four months after the consummation of the merger, subject to certain exceptions set forth in the merger agreement; o receipt of opinions of counsel that the merger with itract qualifies as a tax-free exchange under Section 351 of the Internal Revenue Code and is not subject to taxation in Puerto Rico o receipt of a ruling from the Puerto Rico Treasury Department and an opinion of counsel that the merger of Margo into Holdings qualifies as a tax-free reorganization under the Puerto Rico Internal Revenue Code; o receipt of a release from Michael J. Spector, Margaret D. Spector and Margo Nursery Farms Inc. whereby said persons release Margo, Holdings, itract and ICES from all liability relating to the occupancy by Margo and its subsidiaries of the nursery farm leased from Mr. and Mrs. Spector; and o receipt of an indemnification agreement from Michael J. Spector and Margo Nursery Farms, Inc. pursuant to which said persons agree to indemnify Holdings, itract and ICES for a breach of certain environmental representations. Indemnification and Insurance After the effective time of the itract merger, Holdings will indemnify and hold harmless each present and former officer and director of Margo, Holdings, iTract Acquisition Sub and the other subsidiaries of Margo against any claims, liabilities, costs or expenses pertaining to any matter existing or occurring before or after the effective time of the merger to the fullest extent permitted by the certificate of incorporation and by-laws of Margo immediately prior to the consummation of the merger with Holdings 42
S-452nd Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 52nd
Termination The merger agreement may be terminated prior to the completion of the itract merger only as follows: o by written agreement of all the parties at any time; o unilaterally by Margo or Holdings if satisfaction of any of the conditions to their obligations becomes impossible and is not waived or the merger has not occurred by August 15, 2000 (subject to a 60 day extension if this proxy statement/prospectus has not been declared effective by the SEC), in either case other than as a result of a material breach or default by Margo, Holdings or Michael J. Spector; o unilaterally by itract if satisfaction of any of the conditions to its obligations becomes impossible and is not waived or the merger has not occurred by August 15, 2000 (subject to a 60 day extension if this proxy statement/prospectus has not been declared effective by the SEC), in either case other than as a result of a material breach or default by itract; o unilaterally by Margo or Holdings if itract has breached the agreement in any material respect and such breach has not been cured within ten days after notice thereof; and o unilaterally by itract if Margo or Holdings has breached the agreement in any material respect and such breach has not been cured within ten days after notice thereof. Expenses In the event the merger agreement is terminated as set forth above, there is no further liability or obligation of any party, except that: o if the agreement is terminated by Margo or Holdings as a result of a material breach by itract, itract and ICES shall be obligated to reimburse Margo and Holdings for all out-of-pocket expensed incurred by them in connection with the agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby up to a maximum of $100,000; and o if the agreement is terminated by itract as a result of a material breach by Margo or Holdings, Margo and Holdings shall be obligated to reimburse itract for all out-of-pocket expensed incurred by it in connection with the agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby up to a maximum of $100,000. Material Federal Income Tax Consequences The following discussion summarizes the material Federal income tax consequences of the merger of iTract Acquisition Sub into itract and ownership and disposition of shares of Holdings common stock received by itract members in that merger that are applicable to holders of Holdings common stock and itract members. It is based on the Code, applicable U.S. Treasury Regulations, judicial authority, and administrative rulings and practice, all as of the date of this proxy statement/prospectus, and all of which are subject to change, including changes with retroactive effect. The discussion below does not address any state, local or foreign tax consequences of the merger, or estate or gift tax considerations. Each itract member's tax treatment may vary depending upon the particular situation of such member. Holdings and Holdings Shareholders For purposes of the Code, the itract merger will be treated as a nontaxable transfer to a controlled corporation by itract members of their membership interests (or by itract of its assets followed by a liquidation of itract). Holdings will not be subject to Federal income tax on the receipt of those interests. After the itract merger, itract will be a "disregarded entity" that is not treated as separate from Holdings for Federal income tax purposes. Holdings' basis in itract's assets will be equal to the sum of the bases of the interests itract members transferred to Holdings (or, if 43
S-453rd Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 53rd
the transaction is treated as a transfer by itract of its assets followed by a liquidation of itract, equal to itract's basis in the assets). Persons who were Holdings shareholders prior to the itract merger will not transfer or receive any property in the itract merger. Thus, the itract merger will not affect the Federal income tax liability of Holdings' shareholders. itract Members This discussion does not address all aspects of Federal income taxation that may be relevant to an itract member in light of that member's particular circumstances or to a member subject to special rules such as: 1. a financial institution or insurance company; 2. a tax-exempt organization; 3. an S corporation; 4. a taxpayer subject to alternative minimum tax; 5. a dealer or broker in securities; or 6. a person that is not a U.S. holder. For these purposes, the term "U.S. holder" means a person that is a citizen or resident of the United States, a corporation, partnership, or other entity created or organized in the United States or under the laws of the United States or of any political subdivision thereof, an estate whose income is includible in gross income for United States federal income tax purposes regardless of source, or a trust if a U.S. court is able to exercise primary supervision over the administration of the trust or one or more U.S. persons have the authority to control all substantial decisions of the trust. Each itract member is urged to consult his or her tax advisor to determine the Federal tax consequences of the itract merger that may be applicable to the particular shareholder. Some portions of this discussion are based on the assumption that the following statements are true as of the date of this proxy statement/prospectus and that they will remain true until the date of the itract merger: 1. itract has not issued additional membership units (including membership units issued pursuant to warrants or options) since March 31, 2000, and will not issue additional membership units or options to acquire membership units prior to the itract merger; 2. at the time of the itract merger, the adjusted tax basis of each member's interest in itract will equal or exceed the member's share of itract's liabilities, and the aggregate adjusted tax basis of itract's assets will equal or exceed itract's liabilities; 3. the fair market value of the shares of Holdings common stock received by itract members with respect to itract membership interests associated with membership units held prior to December 1999 will be no greater than the value of such interests surrendered in the itract merger; 4. no holder of an option or warrant to acquire itract membership units or Holdings stock will have a plan to exercise the option or warrant other than a generalized plan to realize the value of the option or warrant at some indefinite time in the future before it expires; 5. the number of shares of Holdings common stock to be received with respect to all of the itract membership interests was determined by arm's-length negotiations among itract members and the managements of itract and Holdings; 44
S-454th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 54th
6. in connection with the itract merger, no itract member will receive, directly or indirectly, any consideration from itract, Margo, or iTract Acquisition Sub other than shares of Holdings common stock; 7. except to the extent that holders of earlier-issued membership units may be shifting value to holders of later-issued membership units at the time of the itract merger, none of the shares of Holdings common stock received in the itract merger by an itract member will be separate consideration for, or allocable to, any employment, consulting, or similar agreement with respect to services; 8. the itract merger agreement and the documents described in the itract merger agreement and this proxy statement/prospectus represent the entire understanding between or among itract, ICES, Holdings, Margo, and iTract Acquisition Sub and between or among such entities and the members of itract or the shareholders of ICES, Holdings, or Margo with respect to the itract merger, and there are no written or oral agreements regarding the itract merger other than those expressly referred to in the itract merger agreement and this proxy statement/prospectus; 9. none of the itract members has any plan or intention to dispose of the shares of Holdings common stock received in the itract merger; 10. on each date on which itract issued membership units, the value of itract was equal to or greater than the value of itract on the previous date on which membership units were issued; 11. neither Margo nor Holdings will have issued any options to purchase Margo or Holdings common stock between March 31, 2000, and the date of the itract merger; 12. the itract members each hold their membership interest, and will hold their shares of Holdings common stock, as "capital assets" within the meaning of the Code; and 13. at the time of the itract merger, the assets of itract will not include any "investment company property" other than cash in an amount no greater than $100,000, and the assets of Holdings (treating all assets of wholly owned subsidiaries as owned by Holdings) will not include any "investment company property" other than cash in an amount no greater than $6,000,000. "Investment company property" includes the following types of property: (a) money; (b) stocks and other equity interests in a corporation (other than wholly owned subsidiary corporations), evidences of indebtedness, options, forward or futures contracts, notional principal contracts and derivatives; (c) any foreign currency; (d) any interest in a real estate investment trust, a common trust fund, a regulated investment company, a "publicly-traded partnership" (as defined in the Code) or any other equity interest (other than in a corporation) that is readily convertible into, or exchangeable for, any asset described in (a) to (e); (e) certain interests in precious metals; (f) interests in any entity if substantially all of the assets of the entity consist of assets described in (a) to (e); and (g) any interest in any entity not described in (f) to the extent the value of such interest is attributable to assets listed in (a) to (e). 45
S-455th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 55th
This discussion is not binding on the Internal Revenue Service (the "IRS") or the courts. Neither Margo, Holdings, nor itract has sought or will seek any rulings from the IRS with respect to the positions discussed herein, and there can be no assurance that the IRS will not take a different position concerning the tax consequences of the itract merger or ownership or disposition of shares of itract common stock or that any such position would not be sustained. Receipt of Shares of Holdings Common Stock in the itract Merger To the extent that itract members receive shares of Holdings common stock in exchange for their itract membership interests, they will be treated as having received their stock in a nontaxable transfer to a controlled corporation. Such itract members will not be subject to Federal income tax liability on the gain realized on the transfer, and each such itract member's basis in his or her Holdings stock will equal his or her basis in his or her transferred itract membership interest. Because the capital accounts associated with itract membership units will tend to be greater with respect to earlier-issued membership units, and because the shares of Holdings common stock will be issued to the members in the same ratio that profit and loss is shared, the holders of earlier-issued membership units may be deemed to have received additional shares of Holdings common stock, which they transferred to the holders of later-issued membership units. If so, the value of such shares will be income to the holders of the later-issued membership units. The holders of earlier-issued membership units should not recognize gain on this deemed transfer because they should be treated as having contributed a portion of their membership interest to itract before the merger, after which itract should be treated as having issued the membership interests to the holders of later-issued units, or as having contributed a portion of their shares to Holdings after the merger, after which Holdings should be treated as issuing shares to the holders of later-issued membership units. Any persons that are treated as having received Holdings stock in exchange for services (rather than for a membership interest in itract) will not be treated as having received the stock in a nontaxable transaction, and will be subject to Federal income tax on the receipt of compensation. Distributions by Holdings A distribution on shares of Holdings common stock will be taxable to the holder as ordinary dividend income to the extent that the amount of the distribution does not exceed Holdings' current or accumulated earnings and profits allocable to such distribution (as determined for federal income tax purposes). To the extent that the amount of the distribution exceeds Holdings' current or accumulated earnings and profits allocable to such distribution, the distribution will be treated as a return of capital, thus reducing the holder's adjusted tax basis in the shares of Holdings common stock with respect to which such distribution was made. The amount of any such excess distribution that exceeds the holder's adjusted tax basis in the shares of Holdings common stock will be taxed as capital gain and will be long-term capital gain if the holder's holding period for the shares of Holdings common stock exceeds one year. If the holder received his or her shares of Holdings common stock in exchange for his or her itract membership interest, the holding period for that holder's shares of Holdings common stock will include the period for which the holder held his or her itract membership interest. If the holder received his or her shares of Holdings common stock in exchange for services, his or her holding period will commence on the day following the day on which he or she received the shares of Holding common stock. There can be no assurance that Holdings will have sufficient earnings and profits to cause distributions on the shares of Holdings common stock to be treated as dividends for federal income tax purposes. For purposes of the remainder of this discussion, the term "dividend" refers to a distribution paid out of current or accumulated earnings and profits, unless the context indicates otherwise. Dividends received by corporate holders will generally be eligible for the 70% dividends-received deduction under of the Code. There are, however, many exceptions and restrictions relating to the availability of the dividends-received deduction, such as restrictions relating to (1) the holding period of the stock on which the dividends are received, (2) debt-financed portfolio stock, (3) dividends treated as "extraordinary dividends," and (4) taxpayers that pay alternative minimum tax. Corporate holders should consult their own tax advisors regarding the extent, if any, to which such exceptions and restrictions may apply to their particular factual situations. The Code requires a 46
S-456th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 56th
corporate holder to satisfy a separate 46-day (91-day, in the case of certain preferred stock dividends) holding period requirement with respect to each dividend in order to be eligible for the dividends-received deduction with respect to such dividend. Sale or Exchange of Holdings Common Stock Holders of shares of Holdings common stock will be required to recognize a gain or loss on the sale, exchange or other disposition of shares of Holdings common stock for Federal income tax purposes under the Code. In determining their holding period, holders who received their stock in exchange for their itract membership interests will include the period for which they held their interests prior to the itract merger. Directors and Principal Officers of Holdings after the Merger In accordance with the merger agreement, all of the then current members of the board of Holdings will resign immediately prior to the effective time of the itract merger and will designate as their successors persons designated by itract. In addition, all of Holdings' executive officers and employees will resign as of the effective time, to be replaced by the executive officers appointed by the board of directors of Holdings following the itract merger. Listed below is biographical information for each person who is expected to be a director or executive officer of Holdings upon completion of the itract merger. itract is engaged in an active search for, and intends to name, a permanent chief executive officer, a permanent chief financial officer and other executive officers following the itract merger. Name Age Position ---- --- -------- Henry Kauftheil 39 Chairman of the Board Kevin Kerzner 38 Director, Executive Vice President and Interim Chief Executive Officer Joseph C. Sienkiewicz 44 Director and Interim Chief Financial Officer Anthony Peluso 36 Vice President-Marketing Eli Ofek 38 Director Robert Goodman 36 Director David Rothstein 45 Director Henry Kauftheil has been the sole manager of itract since its inception in May 1999. Since 1995, Mr. Kauftheil has been the Chairman of ICES, a privately held company that primarily develops, invests in and operates Internet technology related companies. Through one of its subsidiaries, ICES acted as founder of itract. Mr. Kauftheil also serves as an officer, director or manager of each of the subsidiaries of ICES. Mr. Kauftheil is also a director of YouNetwork Corporation, a developer of e-commerce software tools, which files quarterly and annual reports with the SEC. Kevin Kerzner was a founder of, and is the current Executive Vice President of itract. Following the itract merger, he will also serve as the Interim Chief Executive Officer of Holdings. From January 1998 until he joined itract in May 1999, Mr. Kerzner was the Executive Vice President of ICES Enterprises, Inc., the predecessor to The TechDepartment.com, Inc., itract's majority member. From September 1996 to December 1997, Mr. Kerzner was a director of sales for eMarketplaces, Inc., a subsidiary of ICES. From July 1995 to August 1996, with the exception of four months during which he worked as National Sales Director at IDT Corporation, a telecommunications company, Mr. Kerzner was the principal of Rtech, a consulting company which he founded. Joseph C. Sienkiewicz, a certified public accountant, has been ICES's Chief Financial Officer since November 1999, and will serve on an interim basis as the Chief Financial Officer of Holdings following the itract merger. Prior to joining ICES, from February 1997 to September 1999, Mr. Sienkiewicz served as Chief Financial Officer at Atwood Richards Inc., a $500 million international multilateral trading company. From February 1996 to January 1997, Mr. Sienkiewicz served as Chief Financial Officer of Ogden Aviation Services, an airline services company 47
S-457th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 57th
and prior to that, from December 1992 to December 1995, he served as the Chief Financial Officer of the Revlon Retail Group. Mr. Sienkiewicz has also served in management accounting positions at KPMG, The Great A&P Tea Company and Simon & Schuster. Mr. Sienkiewicz has an MS in Federal Taxation from Pace University and a BS in Accounting from Seton Hall University. Mr. Sienkiewicz is also a director of YouNetwork Corporation. Anthony Peluso joined itract in January 2000 as its Vice President of Marketing. Prior to joining itract, Mr. Peluso was employed as Account Director at Toolbox Communications, an integrated marketing communications company, from June 1999 to December 1999. From July 1997 to November 1999, Mr. Peluso worked for WHS, a division of Arnold Advertising in Boston, MA. as an Account Supervisor. Mr. Peluso also served as Advertising and Promotions Manager for 1-800-FLOWERS from 1995-1997. Mr. Peluso's experience also includes management positions at Avis Rent-A-Car and Young & Rubicam Advertising. Mr. Peluso has a BS in Marketing from St. John's University. Dr. Eli Ofek has been an Associate Professor of Finance at New York University's Stern School of Business since 1991. Dr. Ofek has a Ph.D. in Finance from the University of Chicago's Graduate School of Business and has a B.A. in Accounting and Economics from Tel Aviv University. Dr. Ofek also serves as a director of ICES. Robert Goodman is currently employed by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York as a Senior Technical Specialist, where he has been since 1988 in various positions of increasing responsibilities. His current role includes designing Internet e-commerce solutions for U.S. Treasury Auctions. Mr. Goodman has a B.S. in Business Management and Finance and an M.A. in Management Information Systems from Brooklyn College. Mr. Goodman also serves as director of ICES. David Rothstein is the president of Dalow Industries, a privately-held jewelry business located in Brooklyn, New York, which supplies mid-range, general category jewelry to the nationwide wholesale market and to large regional retailers. Mr. Rothstein has managed the business of Dalow Industries in various capacities for the past 18 years. He is also the Chairman of the Board of Directors and President of Yeshiva Ohr Shraga, a private school located in Brooklyn, New York. He received his Jurist Doctorate from Brooklyn Law School in 1983 and his Bachelors of Arts from Brooklyn College in 1978. Interests of Certain Persons in the Merger You should be aware that, as described below, certain executive officers and directors of Margo have interests in the merger that are different from, or in addition to, your interests and that may create potential conflicts of interest. Except as described below, Margo is not aware of any material interest in the merger of its executive officers and directors, other than those as shareholders of Margo generally. In connection with the execution of the letter of intent between Margo and itract, Michael J. Spector and J. Morton Davis, who beneficially own 65.7% and 9.8%, respectively, of Margo's outstanding common stock, made a $2.0 million loan to ICES, the indirect parent company of itract. The entire principal balance plus accrued interest on the loan is payable immediately following the effective time of the merger with itract. If the itract merger is not consummated, this loan will be converted into common stock of ICES. In addition, all options to purchase shares of Margo common stock held by Margo's officers and directors will be converted into options to purchase the same number of shares of Holdings' common stock and such options will become immediately exercisable upon consummation of the reincorporation merger. Executive officers and directors of Margo own options to purchase shares of Margo common stock, as more fully described in "Election of Directors to Serve until Consummation of the Merger" at pages 92 to 94. 48
S-458th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 58th
Indemnification and Insurance Pursuant to the merger agreement, Holdings has agreed to indemnify each present and former director and officer of Margo, Holdings, iTract Acquisition Sub and Margo's subsidiaries against claims, liabilities, costs and expenses incurred in connection with claims arising out of or pertaining to matters existing or occurring at or prior to the effective time of the merger. See "THE MERGER--Terms of the Merger Agreement--Indemnification and Insurance." Accounting Treatment The itract merger will be accounted for as a reverse merger. As a result, itract will be considered to be the acquiring entity and Holdings the acquired entity for accounting purposes, even though Holdings is the acquirer for legal purposes. The historical financial information of itract will become the historical financial information of Holdings and historical stockholders' equity and earnings per share prior to the merger will be retroactively restated for the equivalent number of shares to be received in the merger. Restriction on Resales by Affiliates The shares of Holdings' common stock to be issued to Margo shareholders and members of itract in the mergers are being registered under the Securities Act, subject to certain lock-up agreements. These shares may be traded freely and without restriction by those shareholders who are not deemed to be "affiliates" of Holdings or itract, as that term is defined under the Securities Act. An affiliate of Holdings or itract is a person who directly or indirectly, through one or more intermediaries, controls, is controlled by, or is under common control with, Holdings or itract, as the case may be. Any subsequent transfer by an affiliate of Holdings or itract must be permitted by the resale provisions of Rule 145 under the Securities Act (or Rule 144 under the Securities Act, in the case of persons who become affiliates of Holdings after the merger) or otherwise permitted under the Securities Act, and not be subject to any lock-up agreement. These restrictions are expected to apply to the directors, executive officers and principal stockholders of Holdings. Certain current officers, directors, shareholders, managers and members of Margo and itract will enter into such lock-up agreements. Under the itract merger agreement, each member of itract receiving shares of Holdings' common stock in the itract merger will enter into an agreement whereby such member will agree, for a period of eight months following the closing of the merger, not to sell, assign or transfer any securities of Holdings held by such member or acquired by such member. In addition, each holder of more than 5% of Margo's common stock will enter into an agreement whereby such holder will agree, for a period of four months following the closing of the merger, not to sell, assign or transfer any securities of Holdings held by such shareholder or acquired by such shareholder. However, Michael J. Spector and Margaret D. Spector will be able to pledge their shares of Holdings common stock to an unaffiliated lender as collateral for purposes of financing the purchase of Margo's nursery operations and other businesses without such lender being subject to the lock-up provisions, and Margaret D. Spector will be able to sell up to 30,000 of Holdings' common stock during such four months period. INFORMATION ABOUT HOLDINGS Holdings is a Delaware corporation that was formed by Margo on April 5, 2000 as a wholly-owned subsidiary for the sole purpose of effecting the merger transactions. Holdings has no assets other than a wholly-owned subsidiary (which also has no assets) which will merge with and into itract. Prior to such merger, Margo will merge into Holdings with Holdings as the survivor of such merger. Following these transactions, Holdings will be a holding company whose sole asset will be its 100% membership interest in itract. As a result of these mergers, the current shareholders of Margo and members of itract will be shareholders of Holdings. Holdings' current directors are the same as Margo's directors. Michael J. Spector also serves as President and Chief Executive Officer of Holdings. Upon the consummation of the itract merger, all of these directors and officers 49
S-459th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 59th
will resign and are expected to be replaced with the persons listed under "Directors and Principal Officers of Holdings after the Merger." DESCRIPTION OF HOLDINGS' SECURITIES As of the date of this proxy statement/prospectus, Holdings' authorized capital stock consists of 100,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $.001 per share, and 5,000,000 shares of "blank check" preferred stock, par value $.001 per share. No other classes of capital stock are authorized under Holdings' certificate of incorporation. Common Stock itract Inc. issued 1,000 shares of common stock to Margo. Approximately 2 million shares of common stock will be issued in connection with the reincorporation merger of Margo into Holdings and approximately 12.8 million shares of common stock will be issued to itract members in connection with the itract merger. At the effective time of the reincorporation merger and the itract merger, the issued and outstanding shares of Holdings common stock will be duly authorized, validly issued and nonassessable. Holders of the Holdings common stock will have no preemptive, redemption, conversion, subscription or sinking fund rights. Such holders will be entitled to receive dividends when and as declared by the board of directors of Holdings out of funds legally available for payment. Upon liquidation, dissolution or winding up of Holdings, the holders of the common stock may share ratably in the assets, subject to the rights and preferences of any outstanding preferred stock. Each holder of Holdings' common stock is entitled to one vote per share of common stock held of record by such holder. Holdings' common shareholders do not have any right to cumulate votes for the election of directors. Preferred Stock The board of directors of Holdings has the power, without further vote of the shareholders, to authorize the issuance of up to 5,000,000 shares of preferred stock and to fix the terms, limitations, rights, privileges and preferences of any of these shares of preferred stock. This power includes the ability to establish voting, dividend, redemption, conversion, liquidation and other rights and preferences for any or these shares. There are presently no shares of Holdings preferred stock outstanding. Holdings Long Term Incentive Plan In ________, 2000 the board of directors of Holdings adopted, and Margo, as Holdings' sole stockholder, approved, the 2000 Long Term Incentive Plan (the "Plan"), which provides for the grant by Holdings of awards of restricted stock and options to purchase common stock. The maximum number of shares of common stock which may be issued and sold under the Plan is ___________. The Plan, which expires in ________, 2010, will be administered by the board of directors or a committee of the board of directors of Holdings. The purposes of the Plan are to ensure the retention of existing executive personnel, key employees, directors, consultants and advisors who are expected to contribute to Holdings future growth and success and to provide additional incentive by permitting such individuals to participate in the ownership of Holdings. Options granted under the Plan may be either incentive options or non-qualified options. Incentive options granted under the Plan are exercisable for a period of up to 10 years from the date of grant at an exercise price which is not less than the fair market value of Holdings' common stock on the date of the grant, except that the term of an incentive option granted under the Plan to a stockholder owning more than 10% of the outstanding voting power may not exceed five years and its exercise price may not be less than 110% of the fair market value of the common stock on the date of the grant. To the extent that the aggregate fair market value, as of the date of grant, of the shares for which incentive options become exercisable for the first time by an optionee during the calendar year exceeds $100,000, the portion of such option which is in excess of the $100,000 limitation will be treated as a non-qualified option. 50
S-460th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 60th
Options granted under the Plan to officers, directors or employees of Holdings may be exercised only while the optionee is employed or retained by Holdings or within 90 days of the date of termination of the employment relationship or directorship. However, where termination is by reason of death or permanent disability of the optionee, options which are exercisable at such time may be exercised within 12 months of the date of termination of the employment relationship or directorship. Upon the exercise of an option, payment may be made by cash or by any other means that the board of directors or the committee determines. No option may be granted under the Plan after _______, 2010. In addition to providing for the granting of options, the Plan provides for awards of "restricted stock." Such restricted stock will be subject to restrictions on transfer and subject to forfeiture upon termination of employment, for such periods as shall be specified by board of directors or the committee on the granting of each such award of restricted stock. Options or restricted stock may be granted only to such employees, officers and directors of, and consultants and advisors to, Holdings or any subsidiary of Holdings as the board of directors or the committee shall select from time to time in its sole discretion, provided that only employees of Holdings or a subsidiary of Holdings shall be eligible to receive incentive options. The board of directors may amend or terminate the Plan except that stockholder approval is required to effect a change so as to increase the aggregate number of shares that may be issued under the Plan (unless adjusted to reflect such changes as a result of a stock dividend, stock split, recapitalization, merger or consolidation of Holdings) to modify the requirements as to eligibility to receive options, to increase materially the benefits accruing to participants or as otherwise may be required by Rule 16b-3 or Section 422 of the Code. No action taken by the board may materially and adversely affect any outstanding option grant without the consent of the optionee. Under current tax law, there are no Federal income tax consequences to either the employee or Holdings on the grant of non-qualified options if granted under the terms set forth in the Plan. Upon exercise of a non-qualified option, the excess of the fair market value of the shares subject to the option over the option price (the "Spread") at the date of exercise is taxable as ordinary income to the optionee in the year it is exercised and is deductible by Holdings as compensation for Federal income tax purposes, provided Holdings complies with applicable withholding and/or reporting rules. The optionee's basis in the shares will be equal to the fair market value on the date taxation is imposed and the holding period commences on such date. Incentive option holders incur no regular Federal income tax liability at the time of grant or upon exercise of such option, assuming that the optionee was an employee of Holdings from the date the option was granted until 90 days before such exercise. However, upon exercise, the Spread must be added to regular Federal taxable income in computing the optionee's "alternative minimum tax" liability. An optionee's basis in the shares received on exercise of an incentive stock option will be the option price of such shares for regular income tax purposes. No deduction is allowable to Holdings for Federal income tax purposes in connection with the grant or exercise of such option. Transfer Agent ChaseMellon Shareholder Services, L.L.C., New York, New York, will serve as transfer agent for the shares of common stock of Holdings. COMPARATIVE RIGHTS OF SHAREHOLDERS OF MARGO AND HOLDINGS The following is a summary of the material differences between the current rights of Margo shareholders and the rights they will have as Holdings shareholders after the reincorporation merger. The rights of Margo shareholders are currently governed by Puerto Rico law, the Margo articles of incorporation and the Margo bylaws. Upon completion of the reincorporation merger, holders of Margo common stock will become holders of Holdings' common stock and their rights will be governed by Delaware law, Holdings' certificate of incorporation and Holdings' by-laws. 51
S-461st Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 61st
The following discussion is not intended to be complete and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the certificate of incorporation and bylaws of Margo and Holdings, copies of which are attached to this proxy statement/prospectus as Appendices G and H, respectively. Authorized and Outstanding Share Capital Margo. The authorized capital stock of Margo consists of 10 million shares of common stock, par value $.001 per share, and 250,000 shares of preferred stock, par value $.01 per share. As of June 15, 2000, there were 1,882,322 shares of Margo common stock outstanding and no shares of preferred stock outstanding. Holdings The total authorized capital stock of Holdings consists of 100 million shares of common stock, par value $0.001 per share, and 5 million shares of blank check preferred stock, par value $0.001 per share. Holdings has 1,000 shares of common stock outstanding, all of which are held by Margo and will be cancelled in the reincorporation merger. No shares of preferred stock have been issued. Board of Directors Margo. The Margo bylaws provide that the number of directors of Margo shall be five. The act of the majority of the directors present at a meeting at which a quorum is present is the act of the board of directors of Margo. Each director shall hold office until the annual meeting of the shareholders next succeeding his election and until his successor is elected and qualified, or until his prior death, resignation or removal. Holdings The Holdings bylaws provide that the number of directors of Holdings shall be fixed from time to time by the board of directors. The act of the majority of the directors present at a meeting at which a quorum is present is the act of the board of directors of Holdings. Each director shall hold office until the annual meeting of the shareholders next succeeding his election and until his successor is elected and qualified, or until his prior death, resignation or removal. Newly Created Directorships and Vacancies Margo. The Margo bylaws provide that any vacancy in the board, including any vacancy created by reason of an increase in the number of directors, may be filed by the affirmative vote of a majority of the remaining directors though less than a quorum of the board. A director elected to fill a vacancy shall hold office until the next election of directors by the shareholders. Holdings The Holdings bylaws provide that vacancies and newly created directorships resulting from any increase in the authorized number of directors may be filled by a majority of the directors then in office, although less than a quorum, or by a sole remaining director. A director elected to fill a vacancy shall hold office for the remainder of the full term of the class of directors in which the new directorship was created or the vacancy occurred and until such director's successors shall have been duly elected and qualified, or until their earlier resignation or removal. Removal of Directors Margo. The Margo bylaws provide that at a meeting of shareholders called expressly for the purpose of removal of directors, the board or any individual director may be removed from office, with or without cause, by a vote of shareholders holding a majority of the outstanding shares entitled to vote at an election of directors. Holdings The Holdings bylaws provide that any director may be removed from office, with or without cause, by a vote of shareholders holding at least 75% of the outstanding shares entitled to vote at an election of directors. 52
S-462nd Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 62nd
Special Meetings of Shareholders Margo. The Margo bylaws provide that special meetings of Margo shareholders shall be held when directed by the President or the Margo board, or when requested in writing by the holders of not less than 10% of all shares entitled to vote at the meeting. Holdings The Holdings bylaws provide that special meetings of Holdings shareholders may be called by the Chairman, the President, any Executive Vice President, any Vice President, the Secretary or any Assistant Secretary, and shall be called by any such officer at the request in writing of a majority of the board of directors or a majority of the shareholders entitled to vote. Shareholder Action by Written Consent Margo. The Margo bylaws provide that any action required or permitted to be taken at any meeting of the shareholders may be taken by written consent of the holders of outstanding stock having not less than the minimum number of votes that would be necessary to take such action at a meeting at which all the shares entitled to vote thereon were present and voted. Holdings The Holdings bylaws provide that any action required or permitted to be taken at any meeting of the shareholders may be taken by written consent of the holders of outstanding stock having not less than the minimum number of votes that would be necessary to take such action at a meeting at which all the shares entitled to vote thereon were present and voted. However, if shareholder consent is less than unanimous in electing directors, Delaware law provides that written consent may be used provided that all directorships to which directors could be elected at an annual meeting are vacant and filled by such action. Shareholder Proposal and Nomination Procedure Margo. The Margo bylaws and certificate of incorporation are silent on the issue of advance notice of shareholder proposals and director nominations at annual meetings. The Puerto Rico General Corporations Law does not explicitly require that shareholder proposals be the subject of an advance notice to shareholders. Holdings. The Holdings bylaws provide that at any annual meeting of shareholders, only such business shall be conducted as shall have been: (i) specified in the notice of the meeting given by or at the direction of the Holdings board; or (ii) otherwise properly brought before the annual meeting by a stockholder. The stockholder must give notice of the business proposed to be brought before the annual meeting to the secretary of Holdings not less than 50 days nor more than 60 days prior to the annual meeting and comply with the applicable requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. A stockholder's notice to Holdings' Secretary must describe each matter the stockholder proposes to bring before the annual meeting, the name and record address of the stockholder proposing such business, the class and number of our shares which are beneficially owned by the stockholder, and any material interest of the stockholder in such business. Similarly, any stockholder desiring to nominate a person to stand for election to our board of directors must make a written nomination to our Secretary not less than 50 days nor more than 60 days prior to the meeting. The notice must set forth (a) as to each person whom the stockholder proposes to nominate for election as a director, (i) the name, age, business address, and residence address of the nominee, (ii) the principal occupation or employment of the nominee, (iii) the class and number of our shares which are beneficially owned by the nominee, (iv) any other information about the nominee that is required to be disclosed in solicitations for proxies for election of directors pursuant to Rule 14a under the Securities Exchange Act, and (v) any other information about the nominee that is required pursuant to any statute, or any rule or regulation of any governmental authority; and (b) as to the stockholder giving notice, (i) the name and record address of the stockholder, and (ii) the class and number of our shares beneficially owned by the stockholder. 53
S-463rd Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 63rd
Amendment to Governing Documents Margo. The Margo certificate of incorporation provides that the bylaws shall be subject to alteration, amendment or repeal by either the shareholders or directors. Holdings. The Holdings bylaws provide that the bylaws may be altered, amended or repealed, in whole or in part, or new bylaws may be adopted by the stockholders or by the board of directors, provided that notice of such alteration, amendment, repeal or adoption be contained in the notice of such meeting of stockholders or directors, as the case may be. All such amendments must be approved by either the holders of a majority of the outstanding capital stock entitled to vote thereon or by a majority of the entire board of directors then in office. Antitakeover Provisions Margo. The Margo certificate of incorporation and bylaws do not contain any provisions with respect to business combinations. Under the Puerto Rico General Corporations Law, an agreement of merger, or the sale, lease or exchange of all or substantially all of a corporation's assets, must be approved by the corporation's board of directors and the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of stock entitled to vote thereon. As discussed above, the certificate of incorporation provides that the board of directors has the authority to issue preferred stock without shareholder approval. Issuance of preferred stock could impede or prevent transactions that would result in a change of control of Margo. Holdings. The Holdings certificate of incorporation and bylaws do not contain any provisions with respect to business combinations. Under the Delaware General Corporation Law, an agreement of merger, or the sale, lease or exchange of all or substantially all of a corporation's assets, must be approved by the corporation's board of directors and the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of stock entitled to vote thereon. As discussed above, the certificate of incorporation provides that the board of directors has the authority to issue preferred stock without shareholder approval. Issuance of preferred stock could impede or prevent transactions that would result in a change of control of Holdings. The Delaware General Corporation Law also contains a business combination statute, which restricts "business combinations" between a domestic corporation and an "interested stockholder." A "business combination" means one of various types of transactions, including mergers, that increases the proportionate voting power of the interested stockholder. An "interested stockholder" means any person, or its affiliate or associate, that owns or controls 15% or more of the outstanding shares of the corporation's voting stock. COMPARATIVE RIGHTS OF MEMBERS OF ITRACT AND SHAREHOLDERS OF HOLDINGS The following is a summary of the material differences between the current rights of itract members and the rights they will have as shareholders of Holdings after the mergers. The rights of itract members are currently governed by Delaware law (including Delaware's Limited Liability Company Act) and itract's Limited Liability Company Agreement. Upon consummation of the mergers, itract's sole member will be Holdings, the members of itract immediately preceding the mergers will become shareholders of Holdings, and their rights will be governed by Delaware law (including the General Corporation Law), Holdings' certificate of incorporation and by-laws. The following discussion is not intended to be complete and is qualified in its entirety by reference to itract's Limited Liability Company Agreement and the certificate of incorporation and bylaws of Holdings. All references below to itract's Limited Liability Company Agreement are references to itract's Limited Liability Company Agreement as currently in effect. itract's Limited Liability Company Agreement will be amended and restated at the effective time of the merger as set forth in Exhibit A to the itract merger agreement which is attached to this proxy statement/prospectus as Appendix B. 54
S-464th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 64th
Ownership Interest itract. A member's interest in itract is represented by the ownership of "units" and such member's capital account. There is no limit on the number of units of itract that may be issued to members. A member's capital account consists of the amount of capital contributed by such member to itract, increased for, among other things, allocations of profit, and reduced for, among other things, allocations of loss and distributions to such member. In general, distributions to members are made pro rata according to the number of units held by each member, provided that distributions are not made to reduce a member's capital account below zero unless and until all members' capital accounts have been reduced to zero. Holdings. A shareholder's interest in Holding is represented by the ownership of Holdings capital stock. The total authorized capital stock of Holdings consists of 100 million shares of common stock, par value $0.001 per share, and 5 million shares of preferred stock, par value $0.001 per share. Former members of itract will be issued shares of common stock in the itract merger. No shares of preferred stock have been issued or will be issued as a result of the mergers. For a more complete description of Holdings' securities, see "Description of Holdings Securities." Management itract. Under itract's Limited Liability Company Agreement, its business and affairs are managed by a single Manager, who has full discretion make all decisions with respect to its business and broad powers to bind itract. The Manager may also delegate functions relating to day to day operations to officer, agents, consultants and employees. Holdings. Under Delaware law and Holdings' bylaws, the business and affairs of Holdings is managed by or under the direction of its board of directors. Under Holdings' bylaws, the number of directors will be fixed from time to time by the board of directors. It is expected that following the mergers, the number of directors of Holdings will be fixed at six. The act of the majority of the directors present at a meeting at which a quorum is present is the act of Holdings' board of directors. Each director shall hold office until the annual meeting of the shareholders next succeeding his election and until his successor is elected and qualified, or until his prior death, resignation or removal. Officers of Holdings are chosen by the board of directors in accordance with Holdings' bylaws. Meetings and Voting itract. Under itract's Limited Liability Company Agreement, itract is not required to hold annual or regular meetings of its members, although the Manager of itract may call special meetings of members. Each unit entitles the holder thereof to one vote on a matter submitted to a vote of the members, and any action otherwise required to be taken at a meeting of members may be taken by written consent of the holders of units having not less than the minimum number of votes that would be necessary to take such action at a meeting at which all members entitled to vote thereon were present and voted. Holdings. Holdings bylaws provides for annual meetings of its shareholders to elect directors and transact such other business as may properly be brought before the meeting. In addition, special meetings of Holdings' shareholders may be called by the appropriate officers of Holdings or at the direction of shareholders owning a majority of the capital stock of Holdings issued and outstanding and entitled to vote. Any action required or permitted to be taken at any meeting of Holdings' shareholders may be taken by written consent of the holders of outstanding stock having not less than the minimum number of votes that would be necessary to take such action at a meeting at which all the shares entitled to vote thereon were present and voted. Tax Treatment itract. itract is treated as a partnership for federal income tax purposes. Generally, itract as an entity is not subject to income taxation; instead its members are responsible for income taxes on itract's income regardless of whether members receive any distributions. Losses generated by itract's operations are allocated to members and 55
S-465th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 65th
may not be currently deductible by them for income tax purposes against certain types of income realized by them, including compensation, interest, dividends and active business income. Holdings. Holdings, as a corporation, is subject to income taxation. Shareholders of Holdings will not generally be responsible for taxes on Holdings' income but will be subject to capital gains tax for gains realized upon their disposition of shares of Holdings capital stock. To the extent Holdings pays any distributions to its shareholders in a year in which Holdings has current or historical earnings and profits, its shareholders will have to pay ordinary income tax in respect of such distributions. However, Holdings does not anticipate paying dividends for the foreseeable future. See "Material Federal Income Tax Consequences." SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA Selected Financial Data of Margo The following table sets forth certain selected consolidated audited financial data for Margo on a historical basis, for each of the five years ended December 31, 1999. The selected financial data should be read in conjunction with the Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations of Margo, and Margo's consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 1999, which are attached to this proxy statement/prospectus as Appendix I. [Enlarge/Download Table] Years Ended December 31, --------------------------------------------------------------------- Earnings Statement Data: 1999 1998 1997 1996 1995 ---------- ----------- ----------- ---------- ----------- Net sales $6,201,233 $ 5,349,244 $ 6,548,912 $6,108,865 $ 4,933,718 Gross profit 2,230,111 1,726,173 1,365,335 2,137,340 1,777,358 Selling, general and administrative expenses 2,395,350 2,122,976 2,604,106 2,130,114 2,110,380 Income (loss) from operations (165,239) (396,803) (1,238,771) 7,226 (333,022) Loss before income tax provision (127,867) (1,112,837) (750,534) (553,722) (386,334) Net loss (127,867) (1,112,837) (750,534) (577,214) (396,334) Net loss per common share - basic and diluted ($.07) ($.59) ($.40) ($.30) ($.21) Weighted average number of common shares outstanding 1,875,322 1,878,655 1,895,322 1,895,322 1,895,322 Balance Sheet Data: Working capital $4,306,446 $ 3,396,453 $ 4,151,894 $ 4,113,799 $ 5,020,099 Total assets 8,916,981 7,990,208 8,952,088 10,396,211 15,400,582 Long-term debt (excluding current portion) 338,597 85,880 252,883 427,078 354,707 Stockholders' equity 6,241,776 6,369,643 7,529,980 8,271,350 8,848,402 56
S-466th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 66th
Selected Financial Data of itract The following table sets forth certain selected audited financial data of itract for the period from May 12, 1999 (inception) through December 31, 1999. The selected financial data should be read in conjunction with the Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations of itract and itract's financial statements for the period from May 12, 1999 (inception) through December 31, 1999, which are attached to this proxy statement/prospectus as Appendix K. Period from May 12, 1999 (inception) through December 31, 1999 ------------------------------------ Statement of Operations Data: Revenues 0 Web Site Development Costs ($244,826) Selling General and Administrative Expenses ($249,476) Net Loss ($494,302) Balance Sheet Data: Cash $ 958 Total Assets $239,208 Total Liabilities $733,510 Member's Deficit ($494,302) Pro Forma Financial Statements Introduction to Pro Forma Financial Statements (Unaudited) The accompanying unaudited pro forma balance sheet presents the financial position of Margo and itract as of March 31, 2000, assuming the reincorporation merger, the itract merger and the sale of Margo's nursery and other subsidiaries have been completed as of the balance sheet date. The pro forma statements of operations for the period ended December 31, 1999 and for the three months ended March 31, 2000 for Margo and itract, respectively, reflect the reincorporation merger, the itract merger and the sale of Margo's nursery and other subsidiaries, as if the transactions had occurred on the first day of the fiscal year presented and carried forward to the interim period presented. The itract merger will be accounted for as a reverse merger. As a result, itract will be considered to be the acquiring entity and Holdings the acquired entity for accounting purposes, even though Holdings' subsidiary is the legal acquirer. The historical financial information of itract will become the historical financial information of Holdings and historical stockholders' equity and earnings per share prior to the merger have been retroactively restated for the equivalent number of shares to be received in the merger. The pro forma financial statements subsequent to the itract merger include: (1) the pro forma balance sheet as of March 31, 2000, with the net assets of itract at historical costs; (2) the pro forma results of operations for the three-month period ended March 31, 2000 and for the period ended December 31, 1999. The pro forma financial information does not purport to be indicative of the results which would have actually been obtained had such transactions been completed as of the assumed dates and for the periods presented or which may be obtained in the future. 57
S-467th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 67th
[Enlarge/Download Table] UNAUDITED PRO FORMA BALANCE SHEET As of March 31, 2000 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (a) (b) Pro Forma Holdings Adjustments (formerly Reverse Margo Reincorporation Margo) After Acquisition Before Merger Reincorporation and Pro Reincorporation and Sale Merger and Sale Forma Pro Forma Merger of Business of Business itract Adjustments Holdings ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ASSETS Current Assets: Cash and equivalents $ 640,046 $ 4,359,954 $ 5,000,000 $ 7,523 $ 346,495 $ 5,354,018(c) Short-term investments 500,000 (500,000) -- -- -- -- Accounts receivable, net 1,451,240 (1,451,240) -- 1,000 -- 1,000 Inventories 3,120,234 (3,120,234) -- -- -- -- Current portion of notes receivable 475,000 (475,000) -- -- -- -- Prepaid expenses and other current assets 282,266 (282,266) -- 7,973 -- 7,973 ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- Total current assets 6,468,786 (1,468,786) 5,000,000 16,496 346,495 5,362,991 Property and equipment, net 1,786,853 (1,786,853) -- -- -- -- Due from shareholder 335,610 (335,610) -- -- -- -- Notes receivable 67,915 (67,915) -- -- -- -- Other assets 124,808 (124,808) -- 370,520 -- 370,520 ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- Total assets $ 8,783,972 $(3,783,972) $ 5,000,000 $ 387,016 $ 346,495 $ 5,733,511 =========== =========== =========== =========== =========== =========== LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY Current Liabilities: Current portion of long-term debt $ 79,613 $ (79,613) $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- Notes payable 1,100,000 (1,100,000) -- -- -- -- Accounts payable 744,930 (734,930) 10,000 93,805 -- 103,805 Accrued expenses 166,559 (166,559) -- 88,439 -- 88,439 Intercompany accounts -- -- -- 1,003,103 -- 1,003,103 ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- Total current liabilities 2,091,102 (2,081,102) 10,000 1,185,347 -- 1,195,347 Deferred revenue 111,885 (111,885) -- -- -- -- Long-term debt 338,597 (338,597) -- -- -- -- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- Total liabilities 2,541,584 (2,531,584) 10,000 1,185,347 -- 1,195,347 ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- Shareholders' Equity: Preferred stock Common stock 1,922 -- 1,922 -- 13,344 15,266(c)(d) Additional paid-in capital 4,657,544 -- 4,657,544 -- 759,973 5,417,517(c)(d)(e) Retained earnings (deficit) 1,679,210 (1,252,388) 426,822 (798,331) (426,822) (798,331)(e) Treasury stock (96,288) -- (96,288) -- -- (96,288) ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- Total shareholders' equity 6,242,388 (1,252,388) 4,990,000 (798,331) 346,495 4,538,163 ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- Total liabilities and shareholders' equity $ 8,783,972 $(3,783,972) $ 5,000,000 $ 387,016 $ 346,495 $ 5,733,511 =========== =========== =========== =========== =========== =========== 58
S-468th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 68th
[Enlarge/Download Table] UNAUDITED PRO FORMA STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2000 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (b) Holdings (formerly Reverse Margo (a)(f) Margo) After Acquisition Before Reclassifications Reincorporation and Pro Reincorporation and Sale of Merger and Sale Forma Pro Forma Merger Business of Business itract Adjustments Holdings ----------- ----------- --------- ----------- -------- ----------- Net sales $ 2,107,556 $(2,107,556) $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- Cost of sales 1,372,128 (1,372,128) -- -- -- -- ----------- ----------- --------- ----------- -------- ----------- Gross profit 735,428 (735,428) -- -- -- -- Web site development costs -- -- -- 51,941 -- 51,941 Selling, general and administrative expenses 608,404 (608,404) -- 798,613 -- 798,613 ----------- ----------- --------- ----------- -------- ----------- Income (loss) from operations 127,024 (127,024) -- (850,554) -- (850,554) Other income (expense): Interest income 28,155 (28,155) -- -- -- -- Interest expense (26,240) 26,240 -- -- -- -- Proposed merger expenses (157,281) 157,281 -- -- -- -- Miscellaneous income 9,109 (9,109) -- -- -- -- ----------- ----------- --------- ----------- -------- ----------- (146,257) 146,257 -- -- -- -- ----------- ----------- --------- ----------- -------- ----------- Net loss $ (19,233) $ 19,233 $ -- $ (850,554) $ -- $ (850,554) =========== =========== ========= =========== ======== =========== UNAUDITED PRO FORMA STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS For the Period Ended December 31, 1999(g) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (b) Holdings (formerly Reverse Margo (a)(f) Margo) After Acquisition Before Reclassifications Reincorporation and Pro Reincorporation and Sale of Merger and Sale (g) Forma Pro Forma Merger Business of Business itract Adjustments Holdings ----------- ----------- --------- ----------- -------- ----------- Net sales $ 6,201,233 $(6,201,233) $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- Cost of sales 3,971,122 (3,971,122) -- -- -- -- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- Gross profit 2,230,111 (2,230,111) -- -- -- -- Web site development costs -- -- -- 244,826 -- 244,826 Selling, general and administrative expenses 2,395,350 (2,395,350) -- 249,476 -- 249,476 ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- Loss from operations (165,239) 165,239 -- (494,302) -- (494,302) Other income (expense): Interest income 105,914 (105,914) -- -- -- -- Interest expense (46,876) 46,876 -- -- -- -- Write-down of note -- -- -- -- receivable (80,000) 80,000 Gain from damages caused by Hurricane Georges, net of insurance proceeds 12,880 (12,880) Miscellaneous income 45,454 (45,454) -- -- -- -- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- Loss from continuing operations (127,867) 127,867 -- (494,302) -- (494,302) Loss on disposal of nursery and related segments -- (642,388) (642,388) -- 642,388 -- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- Net loss $ (127,867) $ (514,521) $ (642,388) $ (494,302) $ 642,388 $ (494,302) =========== =========== =========== =========== =========== =========== 59
S-469th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 69th
Notes to Unaudited Pro Forma Financial Statements (a) Represents the expected sale of Margo's subsidiaries (Margo Nursery Farms, Inc., Margo Garden Products, Inc., Margo Landscaping and Designs, Inc., Rain Forest Products Group, Inc., Margo Development Corporation and Margo Flora, Inc.) for an assumed price of $5,000,000 in cash, plus the assumption of debt of approximately $600,000, pursuant to the terms of the stock purchase agreement with Empresas Margo. See (f) below. (b) Margo, a Puerto Rico corporation, will merge with and into a wholly owned subsidiary, Holdings, a Delaware corporation, pursuant to the reincorporation merger. As a result of the reincorporation merger, each stockholder of Margo will receive one share of Holdings for every Margo share that such stockholder owns. (c) Assumes exercise of outstanding stock options to acquire 127,500 shares of Margo common stock. Margo is expected to receive cash of $346,495, which will increase common stock by $128 and additional paid-in capital by $346,368. Also assumes that no Margo shareholder dissents to the reincorporation merger and exercises any appraisal rights. (d) Assumes Holdings will issue 12,680,057 new shares of its common stock to itract members in exchange for all of the outstanding units of itract and 536,045 shares of its common stock upon the exercise of the outstanding warrant issued by itract to InfoSpace. This transaction will increase common stock and decrease additional paid-in capital by $13,216. (e) Elimination of Margo's retained earnings of $426,822 with a corresponding increase in additional paid-in-capital. (f) Elimination of Margo's non-recurring loss on sale of subsidiaries (determined on the basis of the assumed price mentioned in (a) above and the net assets as of March 31, 2000) revenues and expenses and the elimination of the subsidiaries revenues and expenses. Margo acted as a holding company and did not engage in any substantive business activities. (g) Information for itract, which operates on a June 30 fiscal year, covers the period from May 12, 1999 (inception) to December 31, 1999. INFORMATION ABOUT ITRACT Business Overview itract was formed as a Delaware limited liability company in May 1999. itract is an Internet based company established to address the needs of small to medium sized businesses that desire a more efficient and cost effective means to direct market their products and services. itract's system is intended to allow these businesses to analyze, assemble and launch their direct marketing campaigns in a simple, low-cost and effective manner. By accessing itract's Web site, itract customers will be able to develop and launch comprehensive direct marketing campaigns delivering email, fax and traditional postal mail to a targeted audience of both on-line and off-line prospective customers. Itract has completed successful testing of a "beta" version of its software and launched a basic "version 1.0" of its system from its Web site (www.itract.com) on June 30, 2000. Industry Overview DIRECT MARKETING Direct marketing has traditionally been conducted by mailing marketing information directly to consumers. More recently, with the growth of the Internet and advances in telecommunications technology, direct marketers have begun to utilize email and fax machines to deliver their marketing messages to prospective customers. According to the Direct Marketing Association, overall media spending for direct marketing initiatives reached 60
S-470th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 70th
$176.5 billion in 1999, up 7.2% over 1998's expenditures. Direct marketing advertising expenditures represented 57.1% of total U.S. advertising expenditures in 1999. Direct marketing expenditures for business-to-business, at $90 billion, accounted for 51% of total 1999 direct marketing expenditures. According to the Direct Marketing Association, in 1999 a total of $42.2 billion was spent on direct mail campaigns, up from $39.3 billion spent in 1998. In addition, the Direct Marketing Association also predicts that direct mailing expenditures will grow at a rate of 6.2% annually through 2004. Total U.S. direct marketing sales business-to-business grew by 10.4% from $626.4 billion in 1998 to $691.6 billion in 1999, and are expected to grow at an annual rate of 7.4% to $1.17 trillion in 2004. The Internet and Email The Internet has emerged as a significant tool for global communications, commerce and media. The growth of the Internet is the result of a number of factors, including the extensive and growing installed base of advanced personal computers in the home and workplace, increasingly faster and cheaper access to the Internet, improvements in network infrastructure and bandwidth, development of Internet-based applications and increasingly useful content available online. Email is one of the most popular applications associated with the Internet. Increased use of the Internet has resulted in the widespread adoption of email as a regular and dependable communications medium. The ability to inexpensively communicate at any time and from any location with Internet access has resulted in the rapid increase in email use in recent years. Continued growth in the use of email is being driven by its convenience, speed, low cost and the ability to send increasingly large and complex files and attachments, including documents, spreadsheets and multimedia. Today, email is becoming increasingly critical to business-to-consumer and business-to-business communications. Forrester Research estimates that three billion solicited commercial emails were sent during 1997 and predicts that 250 billion commercial emails will be sent in 2002 for both consumer and business email users. Email Marketing Consumer marketing has traditionally been conducted through a variety of media, including direct mail and telephone. The widespread adoption of the Internet and email has enabled companies to create new direct marketing and communications strategies to target and acquire new customers, as well as enhance existing customer relationships. The Direct Marketing Association has estimated that approximately $1.3 billion was spent on direct marketing through the Internet in 1999 and predicts that this number will grow to $8.6 billion by 2004. Email marketing and communications strategies are gaining acceptance among a wide variety of businesses. In a 1999 Forrester Research study, 70% of online retail, manufacturing and media companies surveyed indicated that email marketing is "important" or "very important" to their sales and marketing strategy and that 66% of such companies are using email for promotional activities. itract believes that email marketing is more cost effective than traditional direct marketing methods and enables significantly faster communication with a larger audience. Fax Marketing Technological advances over the past decade have improved the speed and quality of facsimile transmissions and reduced the cost of fax machines to consumers, resulting in a large and increasing worldwide installed base of fax machines. The proliferation of fax machines and their ease of operation has caused fax usage to increase significantly as a principal means of business-to-business communications. Declining telephony costs and improved transmission technologies have made the transmission of documents by fax a cost-effective and preferred alternative to mail, courier and telex services. In addition, there recently has been a substantial increase in the installed base of fax-capable personal computers. Itract's Business itract's system is being designed to assist small businesses in analyzing, assembling and delivering targeted direct marketing campaigns without the high cost, long lead times and production difficulties associated with 61
S-471st Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 71st
traditional direct marketing. itract expects that the ease of use and functionality of the itract system will allow customers to increase sales, improve effective communication and reduce marketing costs. itract is developing an all-inclusive Internet based direct marketing system designed to empower itract's small business customers with the ability to develop and launch a direct marketing campaign from a single computer, using bulk email, "blast" fax mail or traditional postal mail. To utilize the itract system, the user will access itract's Web site and upload its authored document, which may be a marketing announcement, catalog or any other type of business message, together with a mailing list. The mailing list, if it is the user's own list, may consist of a combination of email addresses, fax telephone numbers and traditional postal addresses. In addition, with version 1.0 of the itract system, users will be able to purchase permission-based email mailing lists from itract. Subsequent upgraded versions of the itract system are intended to provide customers with the ability to purchase mailing lists consisting of permission based fax numbers or postal addresses. Once the authored document and mailing list are provided to itract through its Web site, itract's "smart send" system is intended to be capable of transmitting the authored document to each prospect on the mailing list, through email, fax or traditional postal mail. itract's Internet based direct marketing system will simultaneously reach both the on-line and off-line marketplace. itract will use its best efforts to adhere to all federal and state laws and regulations relating to the transmission of spam (unsolicited email) and faxes. In addition to taking steps to ensure that the itract system is not used to transmit unsolicited email or fax, itract will provide every recipient of information transmitted through the itract system with the ability to contact itract at no cost to "opt-out" of receiving future solicitations through itract. Furthermore, itract will create its own proprietary "opt-in" mailing list database consisting of individuals who have registered with itract on its Web site. Finally, while not available on version 1.0, itract expects that future upgrades of its system will incorporate a rewards/incentives program and include reporting tools that itract customers will be able to use to increase the effectiveness of their direct marketing campaigns. LIST RENTAL/PURCHASE An integral feature of itract's system will be the ability to provide users, for a fee, with targeted mailing lists (initially consisting of email addresses) which may be purchased directly from itract on its Web site. Subsequent versions of the itract system are intended to allow users to purchase fax numbers and postal addresses from a choice of list companies available through itract's Web site. In addition, in the future, itract customers will be able to purchase itract's proprietary, permission based mailing list, which it will compile from information provided directly to itract by individuals accessing itract's Web site. To date, itract has entered into agreements with two list provider companies. Both of these agreements are for a three-year period. One of these agreements is with a provider of permission-based email listings, and the other with a provider of permission-based fax listings. Under these agreements, itract, at no initial cost, has been granted the nonexclusive right to resell such mailing lists to its customers, and pays the list providers royalties upon sales to itract customers. itract may enter into agreements with other list provider companies which require itract to pay initial licensing fees. Using features expected to be accessible on its Web site, itract users will be able to construct mailing lists tailored to their demographic, geographic, product and/or service specifications. In addition to providing users with targeted mailing lists, itract's Web site is intended to allow customers to manage, analyze, search and manipulate the data contained in their contact lists (whether or not purchased from itract). FREERIDE.COM(R)REWARDS PROGRAM To generate increased use and loyalty, the itract system will incorporate a rewards and loyalty points program. To this end, itract has entered into an agreement with FreeRide.com, LLC, an established online rewards and loyalty points program organization. Rewards points provided through FreeRide will be used in three ways. To generate increased response rates, itract customers will be able to provide prospects that respond to its direct marketing efforts with rewards points. itract customers will also earn rewards points for utilizing the itract system. In addition, anyone 62
S-472nd Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 72nd
who registers for itract's permission-based registry will be eligible to instantly receive reward points. Reward points will be redeemable at both online and offline retailers that participate in FreeRide's program, as well as for itract services. Under the terms of this agreement, itract will pay FreeRide a specified price for each "Point" awarded by itract under the agreement. SPAM PRECAUTIONS, ANTI-SPAM REGISTRY All email lists provided by itract, including those lists purchased from third party list providers, will be designed, to the greatest extent practicable, to include only prospects that have specifically requested to receive information of interest or have been given the option to opt out from receiving information but have not done so. All fax mailing lists provided by itract will be purchased from third party list providers which represent that such lists only include prospects that have specifically requested to receive information of interest. In addition, all recipients of information email or faxes through the itract system will be given the option, by accessing itract's Web site, to "opt out" from receiving future unsolicited information of the nature received, and/or opting in to receiving future solicitations in specific categories of interest. To encourage individuals to provide itract with specific opt in information, as well as basic personal information such as name, address, phone and fax numbers and email address, itract intends to award FreeRide(R) Points to individuals providing itract with such information. In this manner, itract will be able to build both an "Anti-Spam registry" (containing the names of individuals who have requested not to receive information), and a proprietary permission based database consisting of the individuals who have "opted in." The Anti-Spam registry will be used by itract customers (whether using their own or purchased mailing lists) to ensure that individuals in the registry who have so requested do not receive unsolicited information. Moreover, customers using the itract system with their own mailing lists will be required to acknowledge an "anti-spam" disclaimer that will appear on screen before continuing. Accordingly, the itract system will attempt to minimize the legal and ethical issues related to the transmission of spam (unsolicited mass email or fax). Revenue Sources itract intends to generate revenue from multiple sources. itract users will be charged both an annual subscription fee (currently anticipated to be $49.95) and a transmission fee for each email, fax and piece of postal mail delivered by itract. In addition, itract will charge its customers for its internally produced permission-based mailing list databases, and itract will earn commissions on mailing lists purchased by itract users through itract's Web site from third party list companies. itract will also charge its customers who purchase reward points for use in their direct marketing campaigns. ITRACT PRIVATE LABEL PROGRAM itract intends to generate additional revenues from its private label program, pursuant to which itract will enter into agreements with strategic partners to provide them with "private label" versions of the itract system which will be accessible from the Web site of such third parties. In addition to maintenance and development fees that these parties will be required to pay to itract for itract's development and management of these private label Web sites, revenues generated from the itract system through strategic partners' Web sites will be shared with itract according to contracted for rates. In this manner, itract's private label program will enable it to gain access to customers that may not otherwise have utilized the itract solution from itract's own Web site. Itract Sales and Marketing SALES itract's sales program will use the following three methods: 63
S-473rd Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 73rd
1. Web site Sales itract's Web site (www.itract.com) is being designed to function as one of itract's primary sales methods. A major marketing goal is to drive traffic to the itract Web site. The "front end" of the Web site is being designed to sell itract services and is the portal to the user site. The member site will be designed for functional ease-of-use and generation of renewal income. The front end of the itract Web site is being designed to grab the customer's attention in the first few seconds. itract believes it succinctly articulates the benefits of the itract system and will encourage customers to purchase its online services. A prospect will be able to visit the itract Web site for the first time, purchase credits and mount a direct marketing campaign all on the same day. On every page of the itract Web site, the user will have the opportunity to purchase itract's services. A specially created navigation bar provides users with immediate access to the information they require. itract's sales promotion/service description, pricing, ordering, help desk, and contact information are all specially designed to be user friendly. An integral part of the itract Web site will be the member site, which itract believes will be highly sophisticated yet easy-to-use. The member site is being designed from the user point of view. A step-by-step process will walk the customer through importing and building its mailing lists, attaching documents, adding rewards points and transmitting the data to user-specific groups designed by the customer. The member site will be designed to generate renewal revenue. It will include an automated function, which notifies the customer when it has fallen below a predetermined number of credits in its account. This message will prompt the customer to purchase more credits at that time and reward the customer with bonus e-mail credits or reward points for doing so. There will be a hyper-link directly into the "Purchase More Credits" function of the member site, where the customer will be able to purchase more credits. 2. Private Label Program The itract private label program is being designed to facilitate the creation of strategic relationships with companies that private label itract's services. The private label program will allow these companies to market the itract facility from their own Web site and under their own name to their existing customer base. This is intended to permit increased sales of itract's services while keeping direct sales costs low. By partnering with companies that target particular industry segments, itract believes it will gain access to a relevant customer base, which in turn will increase itract's online sales. Because these partnerships will be performance-based, itract will compensate its strategic partners only when a purchase is made, making this channel highly cost-effective. itract will initially leverage its existing relationship with eMarketplaces, Inc., an indirect majority owned subsidiary of ICES. eMarketplaces is an e-commerce provider that utilizes proprietary technology to create community-oriented, business-to-business electronic marketplaces for specific industries. Under an agreement entered into between itract and eMarketplaces, itract will provide eMarketplaces with a "private label" version of the itract system so that existing customers of eMarketplaces will be able to purchase itract's services. itract will seek to enter into agreements with other strategic partners. 3. Direct Sales itract's in-house sales force currently consists of a Vice President of Marketing and one additional account executive, and itract intends to hire additional account executives consistent with its growth needs as required. The in-house sales force will focus on strategic selling. itract's initial target market will consist of the following: Affiliate Programs - itract will seek to enter into one or more agreements that will provide it access to an "affiliate network" of companies doing business on the Internet. These agreements will provide itract with the ability to engage network affiliates (for a fee based either on revenues generated through such Web site, or customers referred through such Web site or other similar criteria) to provide links on their Web sites to itract's Web site. In 64
S-474th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 74th
this manner, if itract is able to successfully engage such affiliates, itract will be able to reach prospective customers that may not otherwise have been aware of itract's services. On-line and Off-Line Businesses and Services - itract will use its own itract system to bulk e-mail and fax promotional information regarding the itract system's capabilities to on-line and off-line businesses. Trial Offer - itract will make its services available on a trial offer basis to selected customers at rates below its regular subscription rate ($49.95), and with a minimum purchase, will give these customers a certain number of free e-mails and fax transmissions. MARKETING To familiarize the public with the itract system and its capabilities and build brand awareness, itract has entered into several promotional and marketing agreements which will allow itract to incorporate several methods into its marketing strategy. To this end, itract has entered into agreements with both an advertising agency and a public relations agency. In addition, itract has recently entered into an agreement with InfoSpace.com, Inc. InfoSpace maintains an Internet content, commerce and community Web site. Pursuant to the agreement, InfoSpace will post itract promotional placements (which will include textual and graphic links to itract's Web site) on various locations of its Web site. InfoSpace has committed to providing itract a specified number of "impressions" over the two year term of the agreement. An "impression" is defined as a user's viewing an InfoSpace Web site page that has an itract promotional placement and connecting to itract's Web site through such link. itract's sole remedy for InfoSpace's failure to meet this commitment is the ability of itract to extend the term of the agreement up to a maximum of 12 additional months until such commitment is met. As consideration for such services, InfoSpace has been granted a warrant to purchase for nominal value up to a maximum of approximately 3.52% of the shares of Holdings common stock that will be outstanding immediately following the itract merger. The warrant will vest over the two-year term of the agreement, subject to InfoSpace meeting specified performance targets, measured by the number of InfoSpace users viewing the itract promotional placements. In addition, under the terms of the warrant, if the itract merger is not consummated by August 15, 2000, then such warrant will be canceled, and InfoSpace will instead be compensated by monthly cash payments (to the extent the contracted performance targets are reached). Technology itract's proprietary software will be able to interactively determine the proper delivery method for a client's message. This software is implemented in ColdFusion. The itract system was originally developed for itract and has been further refined by itract's own programmers with the assistance of independent consultants engaged by itract. The system consists of itract's proprietary software, which incorporates licensed software for the transmission of faxes, linked to a network of web servers, fax servers, and email servers, redundantly connected to deliver these messages. In addition to relying on third parties for the software that enables the itract system to send faxes through the Internet, itract is dependent on support services provided by third parties for the integration of such software with itract's hardware and proprietary software. Prior to the launch of "version 1.0" of the itract system, itract anticipated licensing such software and obtaining support services from a particular entity which subsequently ceased operations. As a result, itract was forced to delay the launch of version 1.0 of its Web site and incur additional costs. While itract has made alternative arrangements to enable the itract system to provide fax capabilities, if itract's current service providers were unable to provide itract with the services it needs to transmit faxes, itract's business could be disrupted. Clients will be able to upload, and then purchase, contact lists of various demographic profiles, group these contacts by any methodology they wish, and then contact any or all of them using the itract system by a simple online interface that accepts immediate online input or attachment of a document the client has previously authored. itract will handle the delivery of the rendered documents to the client's customers. 65
S-475th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 75th
itract has contracted with an outside data facility provider to provide itract with a data facility, located in New York, New York, where itract will maintain its Web servers, fax servers and email servers. As both an ISP (Internet Service Provider) and CLEC (Competitive Local Exchange Carrier), this provider will provide itract with both Internet connectivity for its email services and telephony services for fax transmission. Competition itract will compete both with traditional providers of direct marketing services and new entrants to the market that provide email and fax direct marketing services. In addition, the majority of businesses today use their internal email systems to provide solutions to manage and deliver outbound email campaigns. Many of itract's current and potential competitors have greater name recognition, longer operating histories, larger customer bases, and significantly greater financial, technological, marketing, public relations, sale, distribution and other resources. For companies seeking outsourced solutions, itract will compete with email outsourcing companies that offer services similar to those provided by itract, including email distribution, list management and reporting. Key competitors include Exactis.com, yesmail.com, Bigfoot International, Digital Impact and MessageMedia. Other competitors offer both fax and email service, such as Cynet, Inc., 24/7 Media, Net Moves Corp., Click Action, Message Blaster and Boomerang.com, and still other competitors of itract provide fax services only, such as efax.com. itract will also compete with E-Letter, Inc. an online direct mail service company whose service is limited to postal mail. The direct marketing industry in general, and the email marketing industry in particular, is intensely competitive. The market is highly fragmented, with the largest companies accounting for only a small portion of the market. There are few barriers to entry, as evidenced by the many new entrants to the market, and it is expected that established and new entities will continue to enter the market. While itract believes that it may be one of the first companies to provide a fully-integrated communications system that through email, fax and postal mail, will simultaneously reach the on-line and off-line marketplace, there can be no assurance that itract will be able to compete effectively with current or future competitors. itract's ability to compete will depend on the success of its sales and marketing efforts, and will further depend upon itract's ability to offer: o technical expertise; o consistent and reliable service; o features and functionality; o full service solutions; and o direct marketing expertise. Intellectual Property Rights itract's success and ability to compete are substantially dependent upon its technology and intellectual property. While itract relies on copyright, trade secret and trademark law to protect its technology and intellectual property, itract believes that factors such as the technological and creative skills of its personnel, new product and service developments, frequent product and service enhancements and reliable product and service maintenance are more essential to establishing and maintaining an intellectual property leadership position. itract has one trademark application pending for the mark "itract" and has no patents or patent applications pending. Others may develop products and services that are similar or superior to those provided by itract. itract has entered into confidentiality agreements with its employees, consultants and corporate partners and intends to control access to, and distribution of its products, documentation and other proprietary information. 66
S-476th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 76th
Despite itract's efforts to protect its proprietary rights, unauthorized parties may attempt to copy or otherwise obtain and use its products, services or technology. Policing unauthorized use of proprietary information is difficult, and the steps itract has taken might not prevent misappropriation of its technology, particularly in foreign countries where the laws may not protect its proprietary rights as fully as do the laws of the United States. Substantial litigation regarding intellectual property rights exists in the technology industry. From time to time, third parties may assert exclusive patent, copyright, trademark and other intellectual property rights to technologies and related standards that are important to itract. itract may increasingly be subject to infringement claims as the number of competitors in its industry segments grows and the functionality of products in different industry segments overlaps. In addition, many of itract's competitors may have filed or intend to file patent applications covering aspects of their technology that they may claim itract's intellectual property infringes. Although itract has not been party to any litigation asserting claims that allege infringement of intellectual property rights, there can be no assurance that itract will not be a party to litigation in the future. Any third party claims, with or without merit, could be time-consuming to defend, result in costly litigation, divert management's attention and resources, cause product introduction delays or require itract to enter into royalty or licensing agreements. Such royalty or licensing agreements, if required, may not be available on terms acceptable to itract, if at all. A successful claim of product infringement against itract could harm itract's business. Government Regulation There is a growing body of laws and regulations applicable to access to or commerce on the Internet. Due to the increasing popularity and use of the Internet, it is likely that a growing number of laws and regulations will be adopted at the international, federal, state and local level with respect to the Internet or direct marketing services covering issues such as user privacy, pricing, content, copyrights, distribution, and characteristics and quality of products and services. Further, the growth and development of the market for email direct marketing may prompt calls for more stringent consumer protection laws that may impose additional burdens on those companies conducting business online. The adoption of any additional laws or regulations may impair the growth of the Internet or email direct marketing, which could, in turn, decrease the demand for itract's products and services and increase itract's cost of doing business, or otherwise harm its business. Moreover, the applicability to the Internet of existing laws in various jurisdictions governing issues such as property ownership, sales and other taxes, libel and personal privacy is uncertain and may take years to resolve. Any such new legislation or regulation, the application of laws and regulations from jurisdictions whose laws do not currently apply to itract's business or the application of existing laws and regulations to the Internet could harm itract's business. Legislation has recently been enacted in several states relating to the sending of unsolicited emails, a practice commonly referred to as "spamming." The federal government and several states, including New York, are considering, or have considered, similar legislation. Although the provisions of these current and contemplated laws vary, they generally limit or prohibit both the transmission of unsolicited emails and the use of familiar spamming techniques such as the use of forged or fraudulent routing and header information. Some states, including California, require that unsolicited emails include opt-out instructions and that senders of such emails honor any opt-out requests, a requirement that is consistent with itract's own permission email policies. itract believe that its permission-based email system will not be affected by such legislation because it does not send unsolicited messages and because its current practices are intended to comply with current and proposed legislation. However, if itract is unable to prevent the transmission of unsolicited email, it may be subject to claims for violations by its customers of federal or state civil or criminal law. In addition, there can be no assurance that such legislation or similar legislation will not also affect permission-based email marketing in a way that could force itract to change its business practices, particularly in light of the rapidly evolving state of the law in this area. In such event, itract's business could suffer. In addition to the laws regulating the Internet and the transmission of email, Federal law makes it unlawful to use a computer or other device to send an unsolicited advertisement to a telephone facsimile machine, and provides a private right of action to recover $500 for each violation of this law. To the extent itract sells fax numbers to its customers, itract intends that all such numbers will belong to individuals that have explicitly agreed to receive advertisements transmitted to their fax machines. In addition, itract will require its customers that use their own fax mailing lists to acknowledge that such list consist only of individuals that have agreed to receive the information 67
S-477th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 77th
being transmitted. However, despite itract's efforts, there can be no assurance that itract will be able to comply with the law, and itract may also be held responsible for violations of its customers. If itract is found to have violated this federal law, itract may have to pay significant damages, its reputation will be harmed and its business will suffer. Employees and Facilities itract employs seven full-time employees, who are located at itract's principal executive offices at 220 West 19th Street, 12th Floor, New York, New York 10011. itract occupies these facilities pursuant to an occupancy agreement with its indirect majority owner, ICES. Under such agreement, itract pays ICES a monthly amount based on the number of itract employees located at these facilities. ICES does not have a current lease for these premises and has been served with a notice of eviction, although ICES is in negotiations with the landlord for the lease of such premises. itract believes that if it is forced to vacate the premises at 220 West 19th Street, it will be able to find suitable replacement offices, although the terms of any such agreement may be at a greater cost than itract's current occupancy agreement. itract's telephone number is (212) 647-8483. itract's home page is located at www.itract.com. Information contained on itract's Web site shall not be deemed a part of this prospectus/proxy statement. Legal Proceedings itract is not currently a party to any material legal proceedings. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions ICES, through its subsidiary The TechDepartment.com Inc., currently owns approximately 91.7% of itract's outstanding membership units. Upon the consummation of the itract merger, TechDepartment.com Inc. will own approximately 80% of the outstanding common stock of Holdings. ICES develops, invests in, and operates Internet technology related companies. Henry Kauftheil is currently the sole manager of itract and, at the effective time of the itract merger, will be the Chairman of the Board of Holdings. Mr. Kauftheil is also the sole director of The TechDepartment.com and the Chairman and a controlling shareholder of ICES. itract currently occupies space previously leased by ICES, for which it pays ICES a monthly amount based on the number of itract employees located at these facilities. Such amount was approximately $5,600 for the month of May, and may increase as itract employs additional personnel. See "Employees and Facilities." Pursuant to a written agreement dated as of May 12, 1999, itract pays ICES a monthly fee of $10,000 in consideration of certain services provided by ICES to itract, including investment banking, legal and accounting services. itract also is a party to an agreement with CoreActive ACG, LLC, another majority-owned subsidiary of ICES, pursuant to which itract pays CoreActive $850 per month for each itract employee that utilizes computer hardware, software and network services provided by CoreActive. itract has also compensated CoreActive ACG, LLC in the amount of $485,000 in connection with the development of certain components of the itract system by employees of ICES and certain of its affiliates. ICES and these affiliates have executed an Assignment of Intellectual Property pursuant to which ICES and such affiliates have conveyed all of their rights in the itract system to itract. In connection with the agreements and obligations described above, at March 31, 2000, itract owed ICES and certain of its affiliates the aggregate amount of $1,003,103. Pursuant to the Agreement and Plan of Merger, itract has agreed that prior to the effective time of the itract merger, all amounts owed by itract to ICES and its affiliates at February 29, 2000 will be discharged and converted into capital contributions to itract, except for the amount of $525,000 (plus interest) payable to CoreActive on demand. 68
S-478th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 78th
Executive Compensation No executive compensation was paid during the fiscal year ended June 30, 1999. Certain entities controlled by Henry Kauftheil, the Manager of itract, received fees from itract for the year ended June 30, 1999, as set forth under "Certain Relationships and Related Transactions." Upon the consummation of the itract merger, the limited liability company agreement of itract will be amended to provide, among other things, that the business and affairs of itract be managed and controlled by its sole member, Holdings, eliminating the position of "Manager." Accordingly, after the merger, Mr. Kauftheil will cease to be the Manager of itract, although it is anticipated that Mr. Kauftheil will serve as the Chairman of the Board of Holdings, following the merger. Employment Agreements Kevin Kerzner, Pursuant to an employment agreement dated as of January 1, 2000, Kevin Kerzner is employed as the Executive Vice President of itract. The agreement is for an initial term of three years, and will extend automatically unless written notice is given by either party at least 90 days prior to the end of the initial term. If the agreement is automatically renewed, it will continue to be extended on annual basis until terminated by either party pursuant to the agreement. Mr. Kerzner will receive an annual base salary of $120,000 in the first year of his employment period, increasing to $150,000 and $200,000 respectively in the second and third years of his employment with itract. Mr. Kerzner will also be eligible to receive a bonus based on the performance of itract. The agreement also entitles Mr. Kerzner to certain other benefits, including medical insurance and participation in certain benefit plans that are or may be available to employees of itract. Under the terms of the agreement, Mr. Kerzner is prohibited from competing with itract for a period of one year following his employment with itract. The agreement may be terminated by itract at any time for "cause" as specified in the agreement. Anthony Peluso. Pursuant to an employment agreement dated as of January 15, 2000, Anthony Peluso is employed as the Vice President -- Marketing of itract. The agreement is for an initial term of three years, and will extend automatically unless written notice is given by either party at least 90 days prior to the end of the initial term. If the agreement is automatically renewed, it will continue to be extended on annual basis until terminated by either party pursuant to the agreement. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the agreement may be terminated by itract at any time upon three months' notice and the payment of severance pay equal to three months of base salary. Mr. Peluso receives an annual base salary of $100,000 (subject to increase in the discretion of itract), and will be eligible to receive a bonus based on the performance of itract. The agreement also entitles Mr. Peluso to certain other benefits, including medical insurance and participation in certain benefit plans that are or may be available to employees of itract. Under the terms of the agreement, Mr. Peluso is prohibited from competing with itract for a period of two years following his employment with itract. The agreement may be terminated by itract at any time for "cause" as specified in the agreement. Financial Statements The audited balance sheets of itract as of December 31, 1999 and June 30, 1999 and the related statements of operations and members' deficit and statements of cash flows for the period from May 12, 1999 (inception) to December 31, 1999, for the six months ended December 31, 1999 and the period from May 12, 1999 (inception) to June 30, 1999 are attached to this proxy statement/prospectus as Appendix K. The unaudited balance sheet of itract as of March 31, 2000 and the related statements of operations and members' deficit and statements of cash flows for the three month period then ended and for the period from May 12, 1999 (inception) to March 31, 2000 are attached to this proxy statement/prospectus as Appendix L. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS OF ITRACT The matters discussed in this section contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, that involve risks and uncertainties. All statements other than statements of historical information provided herein may 69
S-479th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 79th
be deemed to be forward-looking statements. Without limiting the foregoing, the words "may", "will", "should", "could", "intends", "thinks", "estimates", "believes", "anticipates", "plans", "expects", or the negative of such terms, and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those reflected in the forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, those discussed in this section and elsewhere in this filing, including those discussed under "Risks Associated With itract's Business." Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which reflect itract management's analysis, judgement, belief or expectation only as of the date hereof. itract undertakes no obligation to publicly revise these forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances that arise after the date hereof. Overview itract was formed as a Delaware limited liability company and commenced operations in May 1999. itract is a development stage company and it is a member of an affiliated group of companies under common control of its indirect parent, ICES. itract has a fiscal year ending June 30. itract's system is being designed to provide a cost effective and efficient means for its customers to direct market their products and services. By accessing itract's Web site, itract's customers will be able to develop and launch comprehensive direct marketing campaigns delivering e-mail, fax and traditional postal mail to a targeted audience of both on-line and off-line prospective customers. itract has completed successful testing of a "beta" version of its software and launched a basic "version 1.0" of its system from its Web site (www.itract.com) on June 30, 2000. itract intends to generate revenues from multiple sources. itract users will enter into subscription agreements with itract (currently anticipated at $49.95 per annum) for unlimited access to itract's system. A transmission fee will be charged for each e-mail, fax and piece of postal mail delivered by itract. In addition, itract will charge its customers for its internally produced permission-based mailing list databases, and itract will earn commissions on mailing lists purchased by itract's users through its Web site from third party list companies. itract also intends to charge its customers who purchase reward points for use in their direct marketing campaigns. itract expects its e-commerce transactions to generate substantially all of itract's revenues in the future. However, to the extent that the number of subscribed users of itract's system is less than anticipated or that such users do not engage the anticipated volume of e-commerce transactions, revenues generated by itract's system will be less than projected. itract also anticipates deriving additional revenue from its private label program pursuant to which itract will enter into agreements with strategic partners to provide them with "private label" versions of the itract system which will be accessible from the Web site of such third parties. In this manner, itract's private label program will enable it to gain access to customers that may not otherwise have utilized the itract system from itract's own Web site. itract believes that the continued expansion of its operations and marketing efforts is essential to achieving its financial goals. itract therefore intends to continue to increase expenditures in all areas of its operations, resulting in continued increases in cost of revenues and selling, general and administrative expenses. Historical Results of Operations Historical Comparison of the six months ended December 31, 1999 and the three months ended March 31, 2000. Revenue itract has had no revenue to date. itract anticipates that it will begin to generate revenues following the launch of its Web site on June 30, 2000. 70
S-480th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 80th
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses Selling and marketing expenses consist of salaries, travel expenses for sales staff, marketing expenses for itract's system, marketing materials and promotions. Sales and marketing expenses amounted to $18,673, for the six months ended December 31, 1999, and $76,385, for the three months ended March 31, 2000. The increase is consistent with itract's plan, which commenced during the first quarter of 2000, to build an infrastructure and to market its system aggressively, in order to increase the number of strategic alliances, value added services, and ultimately, the number of users. As itract continues to expand sales and launch new services, itract expects to incur significant promotional expenses as well as expenses related to the hiring of additional sales and marketing personnel, increased advertising, public relations campaigns and events marketing. itract anticipates that these costs will substantially increase in future periods. General and administrative expenses consist primarily of salaries and related costs for general corporate functions, including executive, finance, administration, facilities and fees for professional services. General and administrative expenses amounted to $169,198, for the six months ended December 31, 1999, and $722,229, for the three months ended March 31, 2000. This increase is primarily due to a non-cash compensation charge of $546,525 as a result of the issuance of membership units as payment for services rendered, expenses due to the hiring of additional personnel between January 1, 2000 and March 31, 2000 and the increase in overhead and support services necessary to support operations. itract anticipates that its general and administrative expenses will continue to increase significantly as itract expands its infrastructure and administrative staff. Provision for Income Taxes No provision is required to be made by itract for Federal and State income taxes. Under the Internal Revenue Code and similar state regulations, itract has elected to be treated as a partnership; accordingly, the income of itract is taxed to its members. Liquidity and Capital Resources Since inception, itract has funded its operations, working capital needs and capital expenditures through loans and advances from its indirect parent, ICES and affiliates of ICES. On February 24, 2000, in conjunction with the proposed merger with Margo, ICES issued $2,000,000 in convertible notes to certain shareholders of Margo. The proceeds of these notes are to be used to fund the operations of itract on an as-needed basis until the effective time of the itract merger. As of March 31, 2000, itract had cash and cash equivalents of $7,523 as compared to total liabilities of $1,185,347. itract's outstanding liabilities are principally comprised of loans and advances due to ICES and affiliates of ICES. Pursuant to the Agreement and Plan of Merger, itract has agreed that prior to the effective time of the itract merger, all amounts owed by itract to ICES and its affiliates at February 29, 2000 will be discharged and converted into capital contributions to itract, except for $525,000 (plus interest) representing principally the amount incurred by itract for the development of its Web site, which amount shall be payable on demand to CoreActive ACG, LLC, an affiliate of ICES. itract anticipates that it will continue to increase its capital expenditures in the near future due to anticipated growth in its operations, infrastructure and personnel. In addition to any future commitments for capital expenditures relating to leaseholds, improvements to infrastructure, additional licenses for interactive elements (including content management software) and Web site development and security, capital expenditures are expected to average $208,000 monthly through the third quarter of the year 2000. Sales and marketing expenditures are expected to average $ 740,000 per month through the third quarter of the year 2000 in order to reach projected levels of registered users, traffic and revenue from e-commerce transactions on the itract system. 71
S-481st Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 81st
Subsequent to March 31, 2000, itract entered into an agreement with InfoSpace pursuant to which InfoSpace will post itract promotional placements on various locations of its Web site. As consideration for such services, InfoSpace has been granted a warrant to purchase, for nominal value, up to 3.52% of the shares of Holdings' common stock that will be available immediately following the itract merger. The warrant will vest over the two-year term of the agreement subject to InfoSpace meeting specified performance targets. In addition, under the terms of such agreement, if the itract merger is not consummated by August 15, 2000, then such warrant will be cancelled and InfoSpace will instead be compensated by monthly cash payments (to the extent the contracted performance targets are reached). To date, the $2,000,000 advanced by ICES for purposes of funding itract has been sufficient to meet itract's working capital and capital expenditure needs. However, if the itract merger is not consummated, the cash anticipated to be generated from itract's operations will be insufficient to satisfy its liquidity requirements after September 2000, and itract would need to receive additional loans and advances, sell its securities or modify its growth strategy. Upon completion of the itract merger, Holdings will have $5,000,000 in cash, less the amounts previously advanced by ICES. It is anticipated that cash balances on hand at the effective time of the itract merger together with the anticipated cash flow from operations will be sufficient to fund working capital and capital expenditures through June 30, 2001. However, itract's capital requirements are subject to numerous contingencies associated with early stage companies. itract may be required to seek additional financing in the event of delays, cost overruns or unanticipated expenses associated with a company in an early stage of development or in the event itract does not realize anticipated revenues. To the extent that the number of subscribed users of the itract system is less than anticipated or that such users do not engage in the anticipated volume of e-commerce transactions, cash flows generated by the itract system will be less than projected. In addition, itract may seek financing in the future to expand its service offerings or to make strategic acquisitions. There can be no assurance that such financing will be available, or that, if available, such financing will be on terms favorable to itract. Such financing may include the issuance of equity securities which may result in dilution to the shareholders of Holdings. Further, if Holdings raises funds by issuing debt, limitations may be placed on its operations. Failure to obtain financing may impact itract's ability to respond to competitive pressures or to take advantage of strategic opportunities. Web site Development Costs Costs incurred to develop itract's Web site have been capitalized or expensed based upon guidelines issued by the Emerging Issues Task Force Consensus Issue No. 00-2. All costs associated with the planning stage, totaling $296,767 through March 31, 2000, have been expensed as incurred. Costs incurred in the Web site application and infrastructure, graphics and content development stages, totaling $370,520 through March 31, 2000, have been capitalized. Recently Issued Accounting Standards In June 1998, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued SFAS No. 133, "Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities." SFAS 133 establishes accounting and reporting standards for derivative instruments, including certain derivative instruments imbedded in other contracts (collectively referred to as derivatives) and for hedging activities. SFAS 133 requires the recognition of all derivatives as either assets or liabilities in the statement of financial position and the measurement of those instruments at fair value. SFAS No. 133, as amended by SFAS No. 137, is effective for all fiscal quarters of all fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2000. As itract does not engage or plan to engage in derivative or hedging activities, there will be no impact to itract's results of operations, financial position or cash flows upon the adoption of this standard. itract implemented the provisions of Statement of Position ("SOP") 98-5, "Reporting on the Costs of Start-up Activities," effective May 1999. SOP 98-5, issued by the Accounting Standards Executive Committee of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, requires that the costs of all start-up activities, as defined in the 72
S-482nd Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 82nd
SOP, be expensed as incurred. The adoption of the provisions of this SOP did not materially impact the results of operations or the financial position of itract. In October 1999, the Chief Accountant of the SEC requested that the Financial Accounting Standards Board Emerging Issues Task Force ( the "EITF" ) address a number of accounting and financial reporting issues that the SEC believes has developed with respect to Internet businesses. The SEC identified twenty issues for which they believed some form of standard setting or guidance may be appropriate either because (i) there appeared to be diversity in practice or (ii) the issues are not specifically addressed in current accounting literature or (iii) the SEC Staff is concerned that developing practice may be inappropriate under generally accepted accounting principles. Many of the issues identified by the SEC, including those which address barter and revenue recognition, are potentially applicable to itract. Although the EITF has begun to deliberate these issues, formal guidance has not been issued to date for the majority of them. In addition, in December 1999, the SEC Staff issued Staff Accounting Bulletin ("SAB") No. 101, "Revenue Recognition in Financial Statements", which is required to be implemented in the quarter ended March 31, 2000. Although itract believes its historical accounting policies and practices conform with generally accepted accounting principles, there can be no assurance that the final consensus reached by the EITF on the Internet issues referred to above, or other actions by standard setting bodies will not result in changes to itract's historical accounting policies and practices or to the manner in which certain transactions are presented and disclosed in itract's consolidated financial statements. Although the SEC Staff issued SAB No. 101A on March 24, 2000 which delays the implementation of SAB No. 101, itract has adopted SAB No. 101 for its quarter ended March 31, 2000 with no material impact on its financial position or its results of operations. Year 2000 Compliance itract has not experienced any material problems with network infrastructure, software, hardware and computer systems related to the year 2000. itract is also not aware of any material Year 2000 problems with its customers, suppliers or vendors. Accordingly, itract does not anticipate incurring material expenses or experiencing any material operational disruptions as a result of any Year 2000 issues. INFORMATION ABOUT MARGO Business The principal business of Margo and its subsidiaries is the production and distribution of tropical and flowering plants, the sale and distribution of lawn and garden products as well as landscaping design and installation services. Margo is also engaged in seeking sites for the development of residential housing projects. Principal Operations During 1999 and 1998, Margo conducted operations in the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico . During 1997, Margo also conducted operations in South Florida. Puerto Rico Operations Margo's operations in Puerto Rico are conducted at a 117 acre nursery farm in Vega Alta, Puerto Rico, approximately 25 miles west of San Juan, and a 13 acre nursery in the Municipality of Barranquitas, Puerto Rico. The 117 acre farm is leased from Michael J. Spector and Margaret D. Spector, who are directors, officers and principal shareholders of Margo. See "Certain Relationships and Related Transactions -- Lease and Option to Purchase Main Nursery Farm" herein. The 13 acre facility in the Municipality of Barranquitas is leased from Cali Orchids, Inc., an unrelated third party. Margo is engaged in the production and distribution of tropical and flowering plants. Its products are primarily utilized for the interior and exterior landscaping of office buildings, shopping malls, hotels and other commercial sites, as well as private residences. In Vega Alta, Margo produces various types of palms, flowering and 73
S-483rd Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 83rd
ornamental plants, trees, shrubs, bedding plants and ground covers. In Barranquitas, Margo produces orchids, bromelias, anthuriums, spathiphylum and poincettias. Its customers include wholesalers, retailers, chain stores and landscapers primarily located in Puerto Rico and the Caribbean. Margo enjoys a 90% tax exemption under Puerto Rico law from income derived from its nursery business in Puerto Rico. Margo is a supplier of plants and lawn and garden products for The Home Depot Puerto Rico, the largest mainland retailer of lawn and garden products according to Nursery Retailer magazine. As of May 15, 2000, Home Depot had opened two stores, and has announced plans to open seven additional stores in Puerto Rico over the next three years. During the third quarter of 1999, Margo became the largest supplier of live goods (plant material) to WalMart Stores, which presently has nine stores throughout Puerto Rico. Margo provides landscaping services to customers in Puerto Rico and the Caribbean, including commercial as well as residential landscape design and landscaping. Margo is engaged in sales of lawn and garden products, including plastic and terracotta pottery, planting media, such as soil and peat moss, and mulch. Among the various lawn and garden product lines it distributes, Margo is the exclusive distributor of Sunniland Corporation's fertilizer and pesticide products as well as DEROMA Italian terracotta pottery for Puerto Rico and the Caribbean. Margo is also engaged in the manufacturing of potting soils, mulch, professional growing mixes, river rock and gravels. South Florida Operation On August 15, 1997, after a review of Margo's South Florida operation and in view of the strong competition in that market, Margo's board of directors made the determination to close its operation in South Florida effective September 30, 1997, and dispose of all related assets. On September 29 and November 28, 1997, Margo sold the two nursery farms which comprised Margo's facilities in South Florida. Production Margo's plants are propagated by using cuttings, plugs, liners, air layers, seeds and tissue cultures. Cuttings are obtained from Margo's own stock plants and from other nurseries for growout at Margo's facilities. The newly planted cuttings take from two months to five years to mature into finished products, depending on variety. Bedding plants and annuals take from four to eight weeks to mature. Margo's products are either field grown or container grown, depending on the variety of plants and where they are grown. Most of these products start out in small pots and are "stepped up" to larger pot sizes over time. Margo produces both field and container grown material, as well as flowering, bedding plants and hanging baskets. Marketing Margo's marketing efforts have been primarily directed at customers throughout Puerto Rico and the Caribbean. The principal customers of Margo are wholesalers, mass merchandisers, chain stores, retailers, garden centers, hotels, landscapers, government projects and commercial businesses located in Puerto Rico and the Caribbean. Margo targets construction and government projects which require extensive landscaping. In addition, Landscaping provides landscaping design, installation and maintenance services which complement the sales function. For large retailers in Puerto Rico (such as The Home Depot, WalMart Stores, Kmart, and Masso Expo), Margo develops promotional programs which include deliveries to customer outlets and special pricing based on volume. For the three months ended March 31, 2000 and the year ended December 31, 1999, Margo's two largest customers accounted for approximately 16% and 26%, respectively, of Margo's net sales. The Home Depot 74
S-484th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 84th
accounted for approximately 28% and 26% and WalMart Stores accounted for approximately 8% and 12% of Margo's net sales for the three months ended March 31, 2000 and the year ended December 31, 1999, respectively. During 1998 and 1997, Margo's single largest customer, Masso Expo (formerly Builders Square) accounted for approximately 13% and 24%, respectively, of Margo's net sales. Margo does not have any significant delivery contracts extending over a one year period with customers, including landscaping contracts. Financial Information Relating to Principal Operations The following table sets forth information regarding operations at each of Margo's operating locations for the three month periods ended March 31, 2000 and 1999 and for each of the years ended December 31, 1999, 1998 and 1997 as well as information regarding assets by location as of March 31, 2000, December 31, 1999, 1998 and 1997. The information is provided after the elimination of intercompany transactions. [Enlarge/Download Table] Three months ended March 31, Year ended December 31 ------------------ ------------------------------- 2000 1999 1999 1998 1997 ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- (Dollars in thousands) Sales by Location: Puerto Rico: Plants $ 1,051 $ 882 $ 3,781 $ 3,019 $ 2,957 Lawn and garden products 531 248 1,120 862 1,390 Landscaping 525 403 1,300 1,468 1,724 South Florida -- -- -- -- 478 ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- $ 2,107 $ 1,533 $ 6,201 $ 5,349 $ 6,549 ======= ======= ======= ======= ======= Operating Income (Loss) by Location: Puerto Rico $ 127 $ 36 $ (165) $ (397) $ (722) South Florida -- -- -- -- (517) ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- $ 127 $ 36 $ (165) $ (397) $(1,239) ======= ======= ======= ======= ======= Identifiable Assets by Location: Puerto Rico $ 8,784 $ 7,847 $ 8,917 $ 7,990 $ 8,952 South Florida -- -- -- -- -- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- $ 8,784 $ 7,847 $ 8,917 $ 7,990 $ 8,952 ======= ======= ======= ======= ======= Trade Names and Trademark Margo utilizes the Trade Names "Margo Farms" and "Margo Farms del Caribe", and has registered the name "Margo Farms" as a trademark with the United States Department of Commerce Patent and Trademark Office. In addition, Margo has registered "Margo Farms del Caribe" (as a trade name) and "Rain Forest" (as a trademark) with the Department of State of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico. Competition At the present time, Margo's sales efforts are primarily focused in Puerto Rico and the Caribbean. Margo enjoys an advantage over its competitors because it is the largest producer of quality nursery products in Puerto Rico. Margo continues expanding its operations in Puerto Rico. Most of Margo's competitors in Puerto Rico and the Caribbean are small nurseries and landscapers. 75
S-485th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 85th
Seasonality The demand for plants in Puerto Rico is year round, with increased demand during spring, late fall and winter. Working Capital Requirements of the Industry The nursery industry requires producers to maintain large quantities of stock plants and inventory to meet customer demand and to assure a new source of products in the future. As a result, producers need to invest significant amounts of capital in stock plants and inventory. Should the itract merger not be consummated for any reason, Margo believes that it has sufficient working capital for its existing nursery operations from cash flow generated from operations and short-term borrowings. Employees At March 31, 2000, Margo had 183 full time employees, of which 163 were directly involved in nursery production activities, and 20 in sales, accounting and administration. None of its employees are represented by a union. Government Regulation The United States Department of Agriculture ("USDA") inspects cuttings imported into the United States by Margo. In addition, USDA regulations control various aspects of Margo's plant production process, including restrictions on the types of pesticides and fertilizers. All pesticides and fertilizers utilized by Margo are approved by the Environmental Protection Agency, as required by USDA regulations. The USDA prohibits the importation of foreign soil into the United States and limits the size of plants that can be imported into the United States. Puerto Rico is considered part of the United States for purposes of the USDA regulations. Shipments of products may also be subject to inspections by certain Puerto Rico or state officials. These officials may quarantine or destroy plants that are contaminated or infected by hazardous organisms. Margo's operations are subject to the Fair Labor Standards Act which governs such matters as minimum wage requirements, overtime and other working conditions. A large number of Margo's personnel are paid at or just above the federal minimum wage level and, accordingly, changes in such minimum wage rate have an adverse effect on Margo's labor costs. Natural Hazards Margo's operations are vulnerable to severe weather, such as hurricanes, floods, storms and, to a lesser extent, plant disease and pests. Margo believes that it currently maintains adequate insurance coverage for its facilities and equipment. As of May 14, 2000, Margo had been unable to obtain adequate crop and business interruption insurance coverage at a reasonable cost. Margo intends to continue to seek to obtain crop and business interruption insurance coverage at reasonable rates. However, no assurance can be given that Margo will be able to obtain such insurance coverages. Margo believes it has taken reasonable precautions to protect its plants and operations from natural hazards. Margo's newer facilities are being constructed with fabricated steel in an attempt to reduce the damage from any future storms. Each of Margo's locations currently has access to a plentiful water supply and facilities for the protection of many of their weathersensitive plants. 76
S-486th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 86th
Industry Segments Margo has three reportable segments identified by line of business: the production and marketing of tropical and flowering plants, the sale of related lawn and garden products and the provision of landscaping services. Certain financial information concerning this industry segment is set forth in Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations of Margo and in Margo's Consolidated Financial Statements included as Appendix I to this proxy statement/prospectus. Income Taxes Federal Taxes As a Florida corporation, through December 31, 1997, Margo was subject to federal income taxes on its worldwide operations. For U.S. income tax purposes, Margo had elected the benefits of Section 936 ("Section 936") of the Code, which provided a credit against Margo's income tax liability based generally on a portion of wages paid by Margo in Puerto Rico. The Small Business Job Protection Act of 1996 (the "1996 Amendments") enacted into law on August 20, 1996, amended Section 936 by repealing the credit available under this Section subject to a ten-year grandfather rule applicable only for corporations that were actively conducting a trade or business in Puerto Rico on October 13, 1995. In light of the phase-out of the benefits of Section 936, Margo decided to change its jurisdiction of incorporation to Puerto Rico, where it enjoys substantial tax benefits as discussed below. As a Puerto Rico corporation, effective January 1, 1998, Margo is generally only subject to U.S. income taxation to the extent it is engaged in a trade or business in the United States or receives income from sources in the United States. Puerto Rico Taxes Margo is also subject to Puerto Rico income taxes from its Puerto Rico operations. Subject to certain limitations, during 1997 Margo's federal income tax liability was creditable against its Puerto Rico income tax liability. The Agricultural Tax Incentives Act of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico (Act. No. 225 of December 1, 1995, as amended) provides its nursery operations with a 90% tax exemption for income derived from "bonafide" agricultural activities within Puerto Rico, including sales within and outside Puerto Rico, as well as a 100% exemption from property, municipal and excise taxes. The Act defines "bona fide agricultural activity" to include the nursery business. The Act became effective for taxable years commencing on or after December 1, 1995. Property During 1999, Margo conducted its operations from nursery facilities located in Puerto Rico. Vega Alta Nursery Facility Margo leases a 117 acre nursery facility in Vega Alta, Puerto Rico, approximately 25 miles west of San Juan. The facility, which includes Margo's corporate offices, consists of approximately 1,130,000 square feet of shadehouses, propagation and mist facilities, as well as a 10,000 square foot warehouse for Margo's lawn and garden products. The nursery facility also has irrigation equipment and pump houses, shipping and storage areas, as well as a home for a field supervisor. The Vega Alta facility is leased from Michael J. Spector and Margaret D. Spector (the "Spectors"), who are officers, directors and the major shareholders of Margo, pursuant to a lease agreement dated January 1, 1993. The lease provides for an initial term of five years subject to one additional renewal term of five years at the option of 77
S-487th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 87th
Margo. During the initial term of the lease, rent was $19,000 per month. The lease also provides that during the renewal term, the rent increases to the greater of $24,000 per month, or the original $19,000 per month adjusted on the basis of the increase in the Wholesale Price Index ("WPI") published by the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, from the WPI which was in effect on January 1, 1993 to the WPI in effect on January 1, 1998. Under the lease, Margo must pay all taxes on the property, maintain certain insurance coverage and otherwise maintain and care for the property. The lease also contains an option which permits Margo to purchase the property at its appraised value at any time during the term of the lease. In consideration of the option, Margo must pay $1,000 per month. On January 1, 1998, Margo exercised its renewal option at a monthly rental of $24,000. The Spectors have committed to grant Margo an option to extend the lease for an additional period of five years ending December 31, 2007. On January 1, 1994, the lease agreement was amended to include an additional 27 acres of land adjacent to the nursery facility at a monthly rental of $1,750. This amendment did not provide for renewal or purchase options for this tract of land. Effective January 1, 1998, Margo and the Spectors entered into an amendment to the lease agreement which grants Margo the right to continue to lease the 27 acre parcel on a month to month basis. Either party may terminate this portion of the lease upon 30 days prior written notice. In connection with this amendment, the Spectors also agreed to reimburse Margo by no later than March 1, 2001, the unamortized value (approximately $45,000 at February 1, 2000) of the leasehold improvements applicable to such parcel as of the date of termination. Effective February 1, 2000, the lease agreement with respect to the 27 acre parcel was terminated. During the three months ended March 31, 2000 and the years ended December 31, 1999 and 1998, total lease payments to the Spectors amounted to $73,750, $309,000 and $309,000, respectively, in each case not including the monthly payments for the option referred to above. Barranquitas Nursery Facility Effective January 1, 1997, Margo entered into a lease agreement with Cali Orchids, Inc., to lease a 13 acre nursery facility located in the town of Barranquitas, Puerto Rico. The lease has an initial term of five years and may be renewed for two additional five-year terms at Margo's option. During the first year of the initial term of the lease, monthly payments amount to $4,500. During the remaining four years of the initial term of the lease, monthly payments amount to $5,000. During the first and second renewal terms, monthly payments increase to $6,000 and $7,000, respectively. The lease agreement does not provide for any purchase option. For the three months ended March 31, 2000 and each of the years ended December 31, 1999 and 1998 total lease payments amounted to $15,000, $60,000 and $45,000, respectively. Lease payments for 1998 reflect a rent abatement of $15,000 due to damages caused by Hurricane Georges. New Vega Alta Facility On March 24, 1999, Margo leased two additional parcels of land from the Puerto Rico Land Authority (an instrumentality of the Government of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico). The two parcels are adjacent to each other, have a total capacity of 321 acres, and are located approximately one mile from Margo's main nursery facility in Vega Alta. Among other things, the lease agreement provides for an initial lease term of five years subject to three additional renewal terms of five years, at the option of Margo. Lease payments are $33,625 per year. For the three months ended March 31, 2000 and the year ended December 31, 1999, lease payments of $8,406 and $25,219, respectively, were paid by Margo. Lease payments for renewal terms are to be negotiated 90 days prior to each renewal term. Legal Proceedings In the opinion of Margo's management, any pending or threatened legal proceedings of which management is aware will not have a material adverse effect on Margo's financial condition or results of operations. 78
S-488th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 88th
Market for Common Equity and Related Shareholder Matters Margo's common stock is quoted on the Nasdaq Stock Market ("Nasdaq") under the symbol MRGO. The following table sets forth the high and low sales prices for Margo's common stock, as reported by Nasdaq, for each of the calendar quarters of 1999 and 1998. The last reported sales price for Margo's common stock on February 8, 2000, the date prior to the announcement of the proposed merger with itract, was $5.75. The last reported sales price for the Common Stock on June 28, 2000 was $12 per share. 2000 1999 1998 ------------------- ----------------- -------------------- Quarter: High Low High Low High Low -------- ---- --- ---- --- ---- --- First $29.50 $2.31 $4 $2 1/16 $3 $1 7/8 Second -- -- 3 1/2 2 1/16 2 1/2 1 5/16 Third -- -- 3 1/4 2 3/16 4 1 7/16 Fourth -- -- 2 7/8 1 15/16 3 2 There were approximately 63 holders of record of the common stock as of June 15, 2000. This amount includes custodians, brokers and other institutions which hold the common stock as nominees for an undetermined number of beneficial owners. Margo did not pay any dividends on its common stock during 1999 or 1998. Financial Statements The audited consolidated balance sheets of Margo as of December 31, 1999 and 1998 and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in shareholders' equity and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 1999 are attached to this proxy statement/prospectus as Appendix I. The unaudited consolidated balance sheets of Margo as of March 31, 2000 and 1999 and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in shareholders' equity and cash flows for each of the quarterly periods ending on those dates are attached to this proxy statement/prospectus as Appendix J. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS OF MARGO Results of Operations for Each of the Years Ended December 31, 1999, 1998 and 1997 For the year ended December 31, 1999, Margo incurred a consolidated net loss of approximately $128,000, compared to a net loss of $1,113,000 and $751,000 in 1998 and 1997, respectively. These amounts represent a consolidated net loss per common share of $.07, $.59 and $.40 for 1999, 1998 and 1997, respectively. Margo's net loss for the year ended December 31, 1999, was due to an operating loss of approximately $165,000, which was offset by other income of $37,000. The operating loss for the year ended December 31, 1999 was principally due to an increase in selling, general and administrative expenses incurred during the year. Margo's net loss for the year ended December 31, 1998 was due to three unrelated events experienced during the year. The first of these events was a decrease in sales of approximately $1.2 million, which precluded additional gross profit to absorb selling, general and administrative expenses. The second and third events were non-operational 79
S-489th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 89th
in nature. These included the write-down of approximately $202,000 to the carrying value of a note receivable and a loss of $609,000 as a result of damages caused by Hurricane Georges on September 21, 1998. During the year ended December 31, 1997, Margo closed its South Florida operation and sold the major assets related to this operation, represented by two parcels of land. Although the sale of these two properties resulted in a gain of $474,574 for 1997, this gain was more than offset by a loss from operations of approximately $1,239,000 of which $517,000 corresponded to the South Florida operation, arising from storage and maintenance costs as well as the write down associated with unsalable inventory and certain other administrative costs related to the closing of the operation. Sales Consolidated net sales for the year ended December 31, 1999 were approximately $6,201,000, representing an increase of 16% over sales of $5,349,000 in 1998. The increase in sales for 1999 was principally due to the result of increased sales volume to chain stores such as The Home Depot and WalMart Stores, as well as a sales contract of mature trees with the Municipality of San Juan. Increases in sales included increased sales of both plant material of $762,000 and of lawn and garden products of $258,000. Sales of landscaping services decreased by $168,000 due to higher volume of post-Hurricane Georges services performed during the fourth quarter of 1998. Consolidated net sales for the year ended December 31, 1998 were approximately $5,349,000, representing a decrease of 18% from sales of $6,549,000 in 1997. This decrease in sales for 1998 was principally due to a reduction in sales of approximately $857,000 to one of Margo's major customers, principally in sales of lawn and garden products, a decrease in the volume of landscaping services of approximately $256,000 and the absence of sales of the discontinued South Florida operation which had sales of approximately $478,000 in 1997. These decreases were offset by increases from new customer base as well as a sales contract with the Puerto Rico Department of Transportation and Public Works of approximately $221,000. Gross Profits The following table sets forth certain information regarding Margo's costs and expenses as a percentage of net sales. Years ended December 31, -------------------------- 1999 1998 1997 ------ ------ ------ Net sales 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% Cost of sales 64.0 67.8 79.2 ------ ------ ------ Gross profit 36.0 32.2 20.8 Selling, general and administrative expenses 38.6 39.7 39.8 ------ ------ ------ Loss from operations (2.6) (7.5) (19.0) Interest income (expense), net .9 1.2 -- Other income (expenses), net (.4) (14.5) 7.5 Loss before income tax provision (2.1) (20.8) (11.5) Income tax provision -- -- -- ------ ------ ------ Net loss (2.1) (20.8) (11.5) ====== ====== ====== The table above reflects that consolidated gross profits as a percentage of net sales were approximately 36%, 32%, and 21%, for the years ended December 31, 1999, 1998 and 1997, respectively. Margo's consolidated gross profit for the year ended December 31, 1999 was 36% compared to 32% for 1998, representing an increase of 4%. This increase in gross profit was spread among all business segments. Gross profit 80
S-490th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 90th
from sales of plant material for 1999 was approximately 37% compared to 32% in 1998. This increase of 5% was due to higher margins under various sales contracts during 1999, as well as sales of plant material during the Christmas season. Gross profit from sales of lawn and garden products was approximately 38% for 1999, compared to 36% in 1998. This increase of 2% was due to higher sales volume of Rain Forest products during 1999. Gross profit from sales of landscaping services was approximately 25% for 1999 compared to 30% in 1998. This decrease of 5% experienced during 1999 was directly related to an unfavorable performance on a specific project during 1999. Margo's consolidated gross profit for the year ended December 31, 1998 was 32% compared to 21% in 1997, representing an increase of 11%. This increase in gross profit was directly related to the closing of Margo's unprofitable South Florida operation during September 1997. To a lesser extent, the Puerto Rico operation also had gross profit problems during 1997, arising from excessive storage and maintenance costs of slow moving inventory. Selling, General and Administrative Expenses Margo's selling, general and administrative expenses ("SG&A") for 1999 were approximately $2,395,000 compared to $2,123,000 in 1998, representing an increase of 13% in dollar terms and a decrease of 1% as a percentage of sales. The increase in SG&A in dollar terms for 1999 was due to increases in shipping and selling costs (principally salaries) as well as administrative salaries, a portion of which were classified as clean up and debris removal in 1998, as a result of the damages caused by Hurricane Georges. Margo's SG&A for 1998 were approximately $2,123,000 compared to $2,604,000 in 1997, representing a decrease of 18% in dollar terms. SG&A as a percentage of sales remained at 40% in both 1998 and 1997. The decrease in dollar terms was due to the non-recurrence of approximately $220,000 incurred at the discontinued South Florida operation during 1997, as well as decreases in shipping, travel and legal services during 1998. Other Income and Expense The decrease in interest income for the year ended December 31, 1999, when compared to 1998, is due to lower yields obtained during 1999 on similar investments. The decrease in interest expense for the year ended December 31, 1999 when compared to 1998, is due to reductions in the outstanding principal balances of long-term debt, despite an increase in notes payable and long-term debt for in the latter part of 1999. Hurricane Georges Hurricane Georges struck Puerto Rico on September 21, 1998. As with other hurricanes, the agricultural industry was the hardest hit sector. At its Vega Alta facilities, Margo suffered moderate damage to all of its fabricated steel structures (shadehouses) and near total destruction of all its wooden shadehouses and its irrigation systems. Total property written down as a result of the damages had a book value of approximately $171,000 at December 31, 1998. At its Barranquitas facilities, moderate damage was also sustained to a portion of its pull and cable shadehouses and its irrigation system, however, all of the shadecloth covers were blown away. As of December 31, 1998, Margo had incurred expenses of approximately $696,000 in connection with clean-up, restoration and debris removal at both locations. Margo's inventory of lawn and garden products did not suffer any damages. However, inventory of plant material sustained significant damages as a result of damage and destruction to shadehouses at both Company locations. Inventory destroyed at both of Margo's locations as of December 31, 1998 had a net realizable value of approximately $362,000. As of December 31, 1998, Margo had received approximately $620,000 from its insurers for property damages, for a loss of $609,000 from the damages caused by the hurricane. 81
S-491st Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 91st
During 1999, Margo received an assistance payment of $12,880 from the Farm Service Agency of the United States Department of Agriculture for debris removal from damages caused by the hurricane. The Puerto Rico Department of Agriculture has committed to provide assistance to bona-fide agricultural enterprises for damages caused by the hurricane. At December 31, 1999, the Puerto Rico Department of Agriculture had approved $111,885 in assistance, subject to the formalization of an agreement, which among other things requires the facility to be operated as a nursery farm for a minimum period of ten years from the date of the signing. Accordingly, Margo recorded a receivable and a deferred revenue to account for the assistance at December 31, 1999. Write Down of Note Receivable Margo owns a note receivable from the sale of a former subsidiary to a Dominican Republic company, which had a carrying value of approximately $302,000 at December 31, 1997. Refer to Note 5 to the Margo consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 1999. On February 12, 1997, Margo obtained a junior lien on the borrower's property and equipment and modified the terms of the note by waiving interest and principal payments until January 2000. On September 23, 1998, Hurricane Georges struck the Dominican Republic. The hurricane severely damaged the former subsidiary's facilities. As a result of the damages caused by the hurricane, Margo determined to write down the carrying value of the note to $100,000 as of September 30, 1998. The write down, amounting to $201,621 was included as an other expense in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 1998. The borrower is now in default with certain modified repayment terms. As a result, during the fourth quarter of 1999, Margo wrote down the carrying value of the note to $20,000, and has included the $80,000 charge as an other expense in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 1999. Sale of Land in South Florida During 1997, Margo sold two parcels of land in South Florida at an aggregate gain of $474,574, arising from Margo's decision to close its South Florida operation. Significant Fourth Quarter Adjustments During the third quarter of 1999, Margo recorded $150,000 in revenues based on estimates of amounts to be received in hurricane assistance payments from the Puerto Rico Department of Agriculture. During the fourth quarter, Margo was informed by the Puerto Rico Department of Agriculture that the actual amount to be received in assistance payments was approximately $112,000. Moreover, the Department of Agriculture informed Margo that the receipt of the payments would be subject to an agreement that its nursery farm subsidiary would remain operating as an agricultural business for ten years. Failure to meet this requirement, could result in all or a portion of the amount received as assistance payments being required to be repaid to the Department of Agriculture. On the basis of this new information, during the fourth quarter of 1999, Margo took a charge against earnings of $150,000 to reverse the revenue previously recognized during the third quarter of 1999 and recorded a receivable and a deferred revenue of approximately $112,000 as of December 31, 1999. Also, during the fourth quarter of 1999, Margo recorded a charge of to earnings of $80,000 to write down the carrying value of a note receivable from $`100,000 to $20,000, see "Write Down of Note Receivable". Results of Operations for the Quarters Ended March 31, 2000 and 1999 During the first three months of 2000, Margo incurred a net loss of approximately $19,000, or $.01 per share, compared to net income of approximately $63,000 for the same period in 1999, or $.03 per share. However, income 82
S-492nd Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 92nd
from operations for the first three months of 2000 was approximately $127,000 compared to $36,000 for the same period in 1999. The decrease in net profits for the first quarter 2000 is due to an increase in non- operational expenses related to the ongoing merger transaction with itract. Merger related expenses amounted to approximately $157,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2000. Increase in income from operations for the first three months of 2000 is principally due to increased sales, as discussed below. Sales Margo's consolidated net sales for the first three months of 2000 were approximately $2,108,000, compared to $1,533,000 for the same period in 1999, or an increase of approximately 37%. The increase in sales for the first three months of 2000 when compared to the same period in 1999 was due to increased sales in all business segments, the highest of which were lawn and garden products as a result of increased sales of Margo's Rain Forest product line, as well as other increases in sales of lawn and garden products. This increase in sales was principally the result of increased demand by large retail chains in Puerto Rico. Gross Profits Margo's gross profit for the first three months of 2000 was 34.9%, compared to 36.7% for the same period in 1999, or a decrease of approximately 1.8%. The decrease in gross profit of 1.8% for the first three months of 2000 when compared to the same period in 1999 is principally due to a reduction in margins of plant material, offset in part by the increase in margins of lawn and garden products. Selling, General and Administrative Expenses SG&A were approximately $608,000 and $526,000 for the first three months of 2000 and 1999, respectively, representing an increase of approximately 16% in dollar terms and a decrease of 5% as a percentage of sales. The increase in SG&A in dollar terms for the first three months of 2000 when compared to the same period in 1999 is due, among other things, to increases in repairs and maintenance expenses as well as salary increases in shipping and landscaping. Other Income and Expenses The increase in interest income for the first three months of 2000 when compared to the same period in 1999, is due to higher yields obtained during 2000 with similar investment balances. The increase in interest expense for 2000 when compared to 1999 is the result of additional borrowings of long-term debt during the latter part of 1999. During the first three months of 2000, Margo has been pursuing the proposed merger with itract. Legal, accounting and other expenses incurred in connection with the itract merger during the period amounted to approximately $157,000. Financial Condition Margo's financial condition at March 31, 2000 remains comparable with that of December 31, 1999. Margo's current ratio continues to be strong, with a ratio of 3.1 to 1 at March 31, 2000, compared to 2.9 to 1 at December 31, 1999. 83
S-493rd Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 93rd
At March 31, 2000, Margo had cash of approximately $640,000 and short-term investments of $500,000, compared to cash of $1,083,000 and short term investments of $500,000 at December 31, 1999. The decrease in cash at March 31, 2000 is due to cash outflows used in operations of $372,000, principally from an increase in accounts receivable of approximately $356,000 as a result of increased sales, as well as other minor cash outflows arising from additions to property and equipment of $41,000 and repayment of long-term debt of $30,000. As a result of a decrease in current liabilities as of March 31, 2000, debt to equity ratio improved to approximately 41% compared to 43% at December 31, 1999. Shareholders' equity at March 31, 2000 remained comparable to December 31, 1999 due to Margo's net loss for the quarter of approximately $19,000, offset by a conversion of stock options into common stock of approximately $20,000. There were no dividends declared nor issuance of capital stock during the first quarter of 2000. Current Liquidity and Capital Resources Margo is presently current on all its obligations. Excess funds have been invested in short-term bank instruments. Margo believes it has adequate resources to meet its current and anticipated liquidity and capital requirements related to its current nursery operations. Inflation The primary inflationary factors which may affect Margo's results of operations and financial condition are the costs of labor and production materials such as soil, pots, chemicals, fertilizer and plant cuttings. During the last three years, the impact of inflation on the results of operations and financial condition of Margo has been minimal due to the stability of wage rates, except for the increase in minimum wage experienced during 1997, and the availability of production materials from a wide variety of sources. Margo does not anticipate that inflation will have a significant effect on its future earnings or financial condition because increases caused by inflation are ordinarily recovered through increases in prices. Year 2000 Issue The inability of computer hardware and software to recognize and properly process data fields using a four-digit year to define the applicable year is commonly referred to as the "Year 2000 Problem". During 1999, Margo completed a review and evaluation of its hardware and software programs and applications and modified and tested its software and operating systems for Year 2000 compliance. As of the date of this proxy statement/prospectus, Margo's hardware and software systems were fully operational and Margo had not experienced any material adverse effect on its operations as a result of Year 2000 Problems, nor had Margo been aware of problems by either its major suppliers or customers. Reclassifications Certain reclassifications were made to the 1998 and 1997 consolidated financial statements in order for them to be in conformity with the 1999 presentation. 84
S-494th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 94th
PROPOSED SALE OF MARGO'S BUSINESSES Background to Sale of Businesses The merger agreement with itract provides that it is a condition to the obligation of itract to consummate the merger with the subsidiary of Holdings that Margo have sold all assets, other than cash and cash equivalents, owned or used by Margo and its subsidiaries in any of the businesses presently conducted by any of them, including all the capital stock of Margo's subsidiaries owned by Margo (other than Holdings' shares of common stock presently owned by Margo). To satisfy this condition, Margo has entered into a stock purchase agreement with Empresas Margo, Inc., which agreement has been approved by itract. On March 17, 2000, Margo retained the services of San Juan Holdings, Inc. ("SJ Holdings") an investment banking firm based in San Juan, Puerto Rico, to seek potential buyers for its existing nursery business and to act as Margo's financial advisor in such a transaction. SJ Holdings prepared a Confidential Information Memorandum containing operational and financial information regarding Margo's nursery operations. Letters of inquiry were sent to approximately 31 firms which had either previously expressed an interest in purchasing Margo's nursery operations or which SJ Holdings had identified as persons in the nursery business that might be interested in pursuing the purchase of Margo's nursery operations. All parties were informed that an Information Memorandum would be forwarded to them upon receipt of an executed confidentiality agreement. Four persons executed confidentiality agreements and requested a Confidential Information Memorandum. Indications of interest were received from only two firms, Pennock Growers, Inc., a Puerto Rico based nursery company and Empresas Margo, a corporation organized by Michael J. Spector. Mr. Spector owns all of the outstanding capital stock of Empresas Margo. The indication of interest received from Pennock Growers was for $4.0 million, subject to possible increase if they could obtain evidence to their satisfaction supporting the projections contained in the Confidential Information Memorandum. The Pennock Growers proposal provided for a structure involving the sale of assets versus the stock of the subsidiaries and was subject to a due diligence investigation. In addition, it provided that accounts receivable over 90 days would not be purchased, that the existing inventory of Margo's subsidiaries would be subject to adjustment based on a market evaluation and that Margo would be required to pay all severance obligations under Puerto Rico law with respect to existing employees. The Pennock Growers proposal also stated that they would have to conduct further due diligence before agreeing to assume any existing indebtedness of Margo. Empresas Margo's indication of interest was for $5.0 million in cash plus the assumption of $600,000 in debt. It was structured as a stock purchase rather than an asset purchase and was not subject to due diligence investigation or possible reduction in price due to valuation of accounts receivable and inventory or payment of severance obligations. In addition, Empresas Margo's proposal indicated that no post closing indemnification would be required from Margo, a condition that itract had informed Margo they would insist on. Based on the structural considerations discussed above, the Board determined that it was very unlikely that they could obtain a binding offer from Pennock Growers that would exceed the price proposed by Empresas Margo or that would allow Margo to comply with the requirement in the itract merger agreement that there be at least $5.0 million in cash and cash equivalents in Margo at the time of the merger and liabilities not in excess of $10,000. Accordingly, the Board decided to pursue further negotiations with Empresas Margo. Negotiations between Margo and Empresas Margo ensued. On June 6, 2000, a special meeting of the Board of Directors was held and based on the considerations discussed above and the opinion of Margo's financial advisor, SJ Holdings, the board of directors voted to approve the stock purchase agreement with Empresas Margo. 85
S-495th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 95th
Recommendations of Margo's Board of Directors Margo's board of directors believes that the proposed sale of its nursery operation to Empresas Margo pursuant to the stock purchase agreement is fair to, and in the best interest of, Margo and its shareholders. Margo's board of directors, with Michael J. Spector and Margaret D. Spector abstaining, has unanimously approved the stock purchase agreement with Empresas Margo and recommends shareholders vote for the approval of the sale of all the stock of Margo's subsidiaries pursuant to the stock purchase agreement. In reaching its decision to approve the sale of its subsidiaries to Empresas Margo, the board of directors consulted with Margo's financial and legal advisors, and considered a variety of factors, including the following: o that the merger agreement with itract provides that it is a precondition to the transactions contemplated thereby that Margo shall have sold all of its assets, other than cash equivalents and the Board determined that the itract merger was in the best interest of Margo and its shareholders; o its determination that it was unlikely that Margo would receive competing offers that were more favorable or that could comply with the minimum quantitative and structural requirements of the itract merger agreement. o the structure and terms of the stock purchase agreement, including the absence of post-closing indemnification or severance obligations; In making its determination, the Board considered the fact that Michael J. Spector, the current Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of Margo owned all of Empresas Margo, and that his ownership of Empresas Margo raised various conflicts of interest. The above discussion of the information and factors considered by Margo's board of directors is not intended to be exhaustive, but includes all material factors considered by the board. In reaching its determination to approve and recommend the stock purchase agreement, Margo's board of directors did not assign any relative or specific weights to the foregoing factors, and individual directors may have given differing weights to different factors. Because Margo shareholders must approve the stock purchase agreement before itract is obligated to consummate the merger, Margo's board of directors unanimously recommends that each of Margo shareholders vote "FOR" approval of the stock purchase agreement. Terms of the Stock Purchase Agreement This discussion of the stock purchase agreement is not intended to be complete and is qualified by reference to the stock purchase agreement attached hereto as Appendix C. Purchase and Sale of Shares The stock purchase agreement provides for the sale by Margo to Empresas Margo of all of the shares of stock owned by Margo in its subsidiaries (except for the shares of Holdings) for a price of $5,000,000 plus the assumption of the outstanding debt (after application of the cash collateral securing this debt) of Margo. As of May 31, 2000, the outstanding principal amount of the debt to be assumed was approximately $812,000. The closing will take place at the offices of Pietrantoni Mendez & Alvarez LLP on the first business day following the satisfaction or waiver of all conditions set forth in the stock purchase agreement, unless another time or place is agreed to by Margo and Empresas Margo. 86
S-496th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 96th
Representations and Warranties Margo has made certain customary representations and warranties in the stock purchase agreement relating to, among other things: o its organization and the organization of its subsidiaries; o the authorization, execution, delivery and enforceability of the stock purchase agreement; o the power and authority of each of its subsidiaries to conduct its business; o the capitalization of its subsidiaries; o title to the shares of common stock of its subsidiaries; o its financial statements; o the absence of certain material changes and events; o taxes and tax returns for each of its subsidiaries; o material contracts; o the absence of conflicts of its subsidiaries with proprietary rights of third parties; o employee benefit plans; o litigation; o labor matters and relations; o insurance; o the absence of conflicts under its charter, by-laws and contracts or those of its subsidiaries; o title to assets and properties of its subsidiaries; o compliance with laws; and o environmental matters. Empresas Margo has also made certain customary representations and warranties in the stock purchase agreement relating to: o its organization; o the authorization and enforceability of the stock purchase agreement; and o the absence of conflicts under its charter, by-laws or governmental orders. 87
S-497th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 97th
Certain Covenants Margo has agreed that until the closing of the purchase and sale of the shares, Margo will cause its subsidiaries to conduct their businesses in the ordinary course and use their best efforts to maintain satisfactory commercial relationships. Empresas Margo has agreed to retain all current employees of Margo's subsidiaries and to honor their years of service for purposes of certain employee benefits, without limiting its ability to terminate employees in the ordinary course or as deemed necessary or advisable. Conditions of Sale The obligation of Empresas Margo to consummate the purchase and sale of the shares is subject to the satisfaction or waiver of several customary conditions, including: o the accuracy of the representations and warranties of Margo as of the closing date; o the absence of any governmental order or proceeding affecting the transaction; and o the receipt of all governmental consents necessary for the consummation of the transaction. The obligation of Margo to consummate the purchase and sale of the shares is subject to the satisfaction or waiver of several conditions, including: o the effectiveness of the registration statement filed by Holdings with the SEC and evidence that the reincorporation merger and the itract merger will occur concurrently with or immediately following the closing of the sale of the shares. o the accuracy of the representations and warranties of Empresas Margo as of the closing date; o the absence of any governmental order or proceeding affecting the transaction; o the receipt of all governmental consents necessary for the consummation of the transaction; and o the receipt of approval by Margo's shareholders of the stock purchase agreement. Survival of Representations All representations, warranties, covenants and agreements made by Margo and Empresas Margo in the stock purchase agreement or pursuant thereto expire on the closing date and Margo has no liability with respect to such representations, warranties, covenants and agreements. Termination The stock purchase agreement may be terminated prior to the closing only as follows: o by mutual consent of Margo and Empresas Margo; o by either Margo or Empresas Margo at any time after October 15, 2000 if, through no fault of the party seeking termination, the closing shall not have occurred; 88
S-498th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 98th
o by Empresas Margo, if Margo has materially breached the agreement in a way that has rendered the satisfaction of any condition to the obligations of Empresas Margo impossible and such breach has not been waived by Empresas Margo; o by Margo, if Empresas Margo has materially breached the agreement in a way that has rendered the satisfaction of any condition to the obligations of Margo impossible and such breach has not been waived by Margo; and o by either Margo or Empresas Margo if a final order from a court of competent jurisdiction permanently enjoins the transaction. Expenses Each party will bear its own expenses in connection with the consummation of the purchase and sale of the shares. In the event of the termination of the stock purchase agreement as set forth above, there is no further obligation or liability of any party, except that: o if the agreement is terminated by Margo as a result of a material breach by Empresas Margo, Empresas Margo shall be obligated to reimburse Margo for all out-of-pocket expenses incurred by Margo in connection with the agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby up to a maximum of $100,000; and o if the agreement is terminated by Empresas Margo as a result of a material breach by Margo, Margo shall be obligated to reimburse Empresas Margo for all out-of-pocket expenses incurred by Empresas Margo in connection with the agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby up to a maximum of $100,000. Opinion of Financial Advisor Regarding Sale of Margo's Businesses Margo retained SJ Holdings to act as its financial advisor to render a fairness opinion in connection with the sale of Margo's existing nursery and other subsidiaries, based on SJ Holdings' qualifications, expertise and reputation. On June 30, 2000, SJ Holdings rendered to Margo's board of directors its written opinion that, as of such date and based upon the considerations set forth in the opinion, the consideration to be received by Margo for the sale of the subsidiaries, consisting of $5,000,000 and the assumption of certain debt as set forth above, was fair to Margo from a financial point of view. The full text of the SJ Holdings opinion is attached as Appendix E to this proxy statement/prospectus. Margo's stockholders are urged to read the opinion carefully and in its entirety. The SJ Holdings opinion is directed to Margo's board of directors, addressed only the fairness to Margo of the consideration to be received by Margo for the sale of the subsidiaries from a financial point of view, and does not address any other aspect of the sale of the subsidiaries or the itract merger or constitute a recommendation to any of Margo's stockholders as to how such stockholders should vote on the proposed sale of Margo's subsidiaries. This summary is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of such opinion. SJ Holdings is a privately-owned merchant banking firm with principal offices in San Juan, Puerto Rico, that also provides financial advisory and investment banking services to small and middle market businesses and investor groups. SJ Holdings has not previously provided any financial advisory services to Margo or itract. However, in the ordinary course of business, an affiliate of SJ Holdings holds accounts for certain customers that may, at any time, hold a position in Margo's common stock. For purposes of its opinion and in connection with its review of sale of the subsidiaries, SJ Holdings reviewed and analyzed, among other things, the stock purchase agreement with Empresas Margo, certain publicly available business and financial information relating to Margo and Margo's financial forecasts. SJ Holdings had discussions 89
S-499th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 99th
with certain officers of Margo about the business and prospects of Margo. SJ Holdings also considered such other information, financial studies, analyses, investigations and financial, economic and market criteria that it deemed relevant. At the request of Margo's board of directors, SJ Holdings solicited indications of interest in acquiring Margo's subsidiaries from U.S. nursery companies and other third parties identified to it by Margo. In connection with its opinion, with Margo's permission and without any independent verification, SJ Holdings relied on the accuracy and completeness of all the financial and other information reviewed by it, furnished, or otherwise communicated to it by Margo or obtained by SJ Holdings from publicly available sources. SJ Holdings did not make an independent valuation or appraisal of the assets or liabilities of Margo and was not furnished with any such valuation or appraisal. Any inaccuracies in the information on which SJ Holdings relied could materially affect its opinion. In conjunction with rendering its written opinion dated June 30, 2000 to the board of directors of Margo, SJ Holdings presented a summary of its analysis to the Board on June 6, 2000. Set forth below is a brief summary of the analyses performed by SJ Holdings in reaching its June 30, 2000 opinion. Historical Trading Valuation Analysis. Under this approach, SJ Holdings reviewed the historical trading prices of Margo's common stock for the period from June 1996 through February 8, 2000, the date of the announcement of the itract merger, and analyzed the implied premium of Empresas Margo's offer to Margo's market capitalization during such periods. Empresas Margo's offer represents an average premium of approximately 37%, 46% and 21% during the years 1997, 1998 and 1999. Based on these premiums, SJ Holdings believes that Empresas Margo's offer, as compared to Margo's historical market capitalization, is reasonable. Although the implied premium for the period from January 2000 to February 8, 2000 is inconsistent with the historical premiums set forth above, SJ Holdings believes that Margo's stock price for this period reflected speculation related to the itract merger and therefore is not indicative of Margo's intrinsic value. Acquisition Premium Over Public Market Valuation Analysis. Under this approach, SJ Holdings analyzed selected publicly announced acquisition transactions during the period from January 1996 through June 2000 for companies in comparable industry groups, since there was no public acquisition transaction in Margo's same industry group. SJ Holdings further analyzed which specific transactions were more closely related to Margo's business operations. The comparable industry groups were: wholesale food products, wholesale natural and organic food products and wholesale and retail general merchandise. Based on the acquisition premiums of the publicly announced transactions in these comparable segments, which ranged from 14% to 24%, SJ Holdings derived a range of market valuations for Margo. SJ Holdings discounted such valuations by applying a discount rate of between 10% and 20% due to the fact that the terms of the stock purchase agreement with Empresas Margo does not contain any indemnification by Margo for breach of representations and warranties, which would have been typical in transactions of this nature but was not permitted by the terms of the itract merger agreement. This analysis resulted in an adjusted implied valuation of Margo of between $4.2 million and $5.2 million. Comparable Public Company Analysis. SJ Holdings analyzed certain financial information of comparable public companies in the nursery and florist business. SJ Holdings considered the mean and median range of the market value of these companies to their sales, assets, book value, tangible book value and earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization. Based on this analysis, SJ Holdings determined that the measure of market value to book value represents a reasonable valuation measure for Margo. Applying to Margo's book value the mean and median ranges of the comparable public companies' ratio of market value to book value, and factoring acquisition premiums ranging from 14% to 24% derived from the analysis of publicly announced transactions, provided an implied acquisition value of Margo 90
S-4100th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 100th
from $4.3 million to $5.7 million. Discounting these valuations for the lack of indemnification in the stock purchase agreement as discussed above, the valuation under this analysis ranges from $3.4 million to $5.1 million. The comparable public companies used are: Callaway's Nursery Inc., Dimon, Inc., Griffin Land & Nurseries, Hines Horticulture and USA Floral. No company or transaction used in the above analyses is identical to Margo. Accordingly, an analysis of the results of the foregoing is not mathematical; rather, it involves complex considerations and judgments concerning differences in financial and operating characteristics of the companies and other facts that could affect the public trading value of the companies to which Margo is being compared. Discounted Cash Flow Analysis. Under this approach, SJ Holdings analyzed the financial and operational projections provided by Margo's management and performed discounted cash flow analyses applying discount rates ranging from 20% to 25% in order to reflect the risk in Margo's cash flows and the lack of indemnification to Empresas Margo. Assuming that Margo's sales grow at 75% of their projected level, and applying the discount rates of 20% and 25% mentioned above, Margo's valuation ranges from $4.9 million to $5.8 million. The projections used were based on numerous variables and assumptions which are inherently unpredictable and must be considered not certain of occurrence as projected. Analysis of Market Solicitation of Indications of Interest. As previously discussed SJ Holdings solicited indications of interest from selected U.S. and Puerto Rico based potential buyers. Besides Empresas Margo's offer, this solicitation resulted in only one indication of interest for approximately $4 million. The material analyses performed by SJ Holdings have been summarized above. Nonetheless, the summary set forth above does not purport to be a complete description of the analyses performed by SJ Holdings. The preparation of a fairness opinion involves various determinations as to the most appropriate and relevant methods of financial analysis and the application of these methods to the particular circumstances. Therefore, such an opinion is not readily susceptible to a summary description. SJ Holdings did not form a conclusion as to whether any individual analysis, considered in isolation, supported or failed to support an opinion as to fairness. Rather, in reaching its conclusion, SJ Holdings considered the results of the analyses in light of each other and ultimately reached its opinion based on the results of all analyses taken as a whole. SJ Holdings did not place a particular reliance or weight on any particular analysis, but instead concluded that its analyses, taken as whole, supported its determination. SJ Holdings' opinion does not address the relative merits of the itract merger as compared to any alternative business strategies that might exist for Margo or the effect of any other business combination in which Margo might engage. Pursuant to the terms of SJ Holdings' engagement, Margo has agreed to pay SJ Holdings a fee of $25,000 in connection with its rendering of the fairness opinion. Margo has also agreed to pay SJ Holdings for its financial advisory services in connection with the sale of the subsidiaries an additional fee of $50,000 contingent on the closing of the sale of the subsidiaries. Margo also has agreed to reimburse SJ Holdings for reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred by it in performing its services, including fees and expenses for legal counsel, and to indemnify SJ Holdings and certain related persons and entities against certain liabilities, including liabilities under the federal securities laws, arising out of SJ Holdings' engagement. In the ordinary course of its business, SJ Holdings and its affiliates may actively trade the equity securities of Margo for their own accounts and for the accounts of customers and, accordingly, may at any time hold long or short positions in such securities. 91
S-4101st Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 101st
ELECTION OF DIRECTORS TO SERVE UNTIL CONSUMMATION OF THE MERGER One of the purposes of Margo's annual meeting is to re-elect the existing five members of Margo's board of directors to serve until the consummation of the reincorporation merger and in the event that the merger is not consummated, until the next annual meeting of shareholders or until their respective successors shall have been elected or qualified or until their earlier resignation or removal. Information Concerning Existing Margo Directors The following table sets forth certain information regarding the nominees for election to the board of directors of Margo as of June 15, 2000. The background and experience of these persons are summarized in the paragraphs following the table. Name (Age at June 15, 2000) Positions with Margo --------------------------- -------------------- Michael J. Spector (53) Chairman, President, Chief Executive Officer and Director Margaret D. Spector (48) Secretary and Director Blas R. Ferraiuoli (55) Director Frederick D. Moss (71) Director Michael A. Rubin (57) Director Each director of Margo holds office until the next annual meeting of shareholders and until his or her successor has been elected and qualified. Background of Directors Set forth below is a summary of the background of each nominee for director of Margo as of June 15, 2000. MR. SPECTOR currently serves as the Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and President of Margo. He has held these positions since the organization of Margo in 1981. His wife, Margaret D. Spector, is Secretary and a director of Margo. MRS. SPECTOR currently serves as the Secretary and as a director of Margo. She has held these positions since the organization of Margo in 1981. Since July 1993, Mrs. Spector supervises Margo's lawn and garden distribution business. MR. FERRAIUOLI was elected a director of Margo in 1988 and continues to hold that position. Since June 1994, he manages his own law firm in San Juan, Puerto Rico. He was a partner in the law firm of Axtmayer, Adsuar, Muniz & Goyco, San Juan, Puerto Rico from March 1994 to June 1994. Prior to March 1994, he was a partner in the firm of Goldman, Antonetti, Cordova and Axtmayer. Mr. Ferraiuoli practices civil, corporate and administrative law and has provided services to Margo since 1987. MR. MOSS was elected a director of Margo in 1988 and continues to hold that position. Since 1986, he has been an independent financial consultant in New York City. He has also served as the Chairman of the Board of Trustees of the Cincinnati Stock Exchange since 1989. MR. RUBIN was elected a director of Margo in 1995 and continues to hold that position. Mr. Rubin is an attorney engaged in private practice. He has been a partner in the law firm of Michael A. Rubin, P.A., Coral Gables, Florida, for more than the past five years. 92
S-4102nd Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 102nd
Compensation of Directors The directors of Margo who are not employees of Margo are paid a quarterly retainer fee of $1,000 and an additional $1,000 for each meeting of the board (or committee thereof) attended, plus any travel and out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with the performance of their duties. No separate fees are paid for committee meetings attended on the same day as a regular board meeting. The directors of Margo who are employed by Margo do not receive additional compensation for serving as directors. Margo also provides directors liability insurance for its directors. As provided under Margo's 1998 Stock Option Plan ("the 1998 Plan") adopted on April 23, 1998, any nonemployee director of Margo who is in office on the first business day following any annual meeting of shareholders shall automatically receive on such date an option to acquire 2,500 shares of Common Stock at the market price on such date. During 1999, Messrs. Ferraiuoli, Moss, Rubin and Mrs. Spector each received options to acquire 2,500 shares of Common Stock at an exercise price of $2 1/2($2 3/4for Mrs. Spector), expiring on May 17, 2009, in accordance with the 1998 Plan. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions Amount due from/to Principal Shareholder In connection with the settlement of litigation with Margo's former principal lender ("the Bank"), on May 29, 1996 Margo advanced $340,158 on behalf of Michael J. Spector, which was the portion of the settlement that corresponded to claims made by the Bank against Mr. Spector in his individual capacity. This amount was reduced by $66,506 that was due to Mr. Spector in connection with the purchase in 1996 of a residence from a partnership controlled by Mr. Spector. During 1997, Margo charged Mr. Spector for certain expenses paid on his behalf. During March 1998, the amount owed by Mr. Spector was converted into a non-interest bearing note due on March 2001. At December 31, 1999 and 1998, Mr. Spector owed Margo $290,226. Lease and Option to Purchase Main Nursery Farm Effective January 1, 1993, Margo and the Spectors entered into a lease agreement with respect to the main Puerto Rico nursery farm. The lease had an initial term of five years renewable for one additional term of five years at the option of Margo. During the initial term of the lease, rent was set at $19,000 per month. During the renewal term, the rent increases to the greater of (x) $24,000 per month or (y) the original $19,000 per month adjusted on the basis of the increase in the Wholesale Price Index ("WPI") published by the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, from the WPI which was in effect on January 1, 1993 to the WPI in effect on January 1, 1998. Additionally, Margo must pay all taxes on the property, maintain certain insurance coverages and otherwise maintain and care for the property. The lease also contains an option which permits Margo to purchase the property at its appraised value at any time during the term of the lease. In consideration of the option, Margo must pay the Spectors $1,000 per month. On January 1, 1998, Margo exercised its renewal option at a monthly rental of $24,000. The Spectors have committed to grant Margo an option to extend the lease for an additional period of five years ending December 31, 2007. Effective January 1, 1994, the lease agreement was amended to include an additional 27-acre tract of land adjacent to the existing nursery facility for $1,750 per month. The lease terms for this additional tract did not include renewal or purchase options. Effective January 1, 1998, Margo and the Spectors entered into an amendment to the lease agreement which grants Margo the right to continue to lease the 27 acre parcel on a month to month basis. Either party may terminate this portion of the lease upon 30 days prior written notice. In connection with this amendment, the Spectors also agreed to reimburse Margo by no later than March 1, 2001, the unamortized value (approximately $45,000 at February 1, 2000) of the leasehold improvements applicable to said parcel as of the date of termination. This agreement terminated effective February 1, 2000. See "Information About Margo Caribe, Inc. --Property." 93
S-4103rd Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 103rd
Certain Other Relationships During 1999, Margo engaged Blas Ferraiuoli and Michael A. Rubin, each a director of Margo, to render legal services on behalf of Margo. Investment by Michael J. Spector in International Commerce Exchange Systems, Inc. On February 24, 2000, Michael J. Spector together with another major shareholder of Margo, made a $2.0 million loan to ICES, the indirect parent company of itract. The loan bears interest at 1% over Prime Rate and is payable in a single balloon payment on the closing date of the merger of Margo with itract. If the merger with itract is not consummated, said loan will be converted into common stock of ICES. LEGAL MATTERS The validity of the Holdings common stock to be issued to the Margo shareholders and itract members in connection with the proposed mergers will be passed upon for Holdings by Shutts & Bowen, LLP. EXPERTS The consolidated financial statements of Margo as of December 31, 1999 and 1998 and for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 1999, appearing in this proxy statement/prospectus and in the registration statement of which this proxy statement/prospectus is a part, have been audited by Deloitte & Touche LLP, as set forth in their report thereon that appears elsewhere in this proxy statement/prospectus, and are included in reliance upon such report given on the authority of such firm as experts in accounting and auditing. The financial statements of itract as of December 31, 1999 and for the period from May 12, 1999 (inception) to December 31, 1999 included in this prospectus and elsewhere in the registration statement have been audited by Anchin, Block & Anchin, LLP, independent public accountants, as indicated in their report with respect thereto and are included herein in reliance upon the authority of said firm as experts in giving said report. WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION Margo files annual, quarterly and current reports, proxy statements and other information with the SEC. You may read and copy any reports, statements or other information that Margo files at the Commission's public reference rooms in Washington, D.C., New York, New York and Chicago, Illinois. Please call the Commission at 1-800-SEC-0330 for further information on the public reference rooms. Margo public filings are also available to the public from commercial document retrieval services and at the Internet World Wide Web site maintained by the Commission at "http://www.sec.gov." Reports, proxy statements and other information concerning Margo also may be inspected at the offices of the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc., 1735 K Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20006. Holdings has filed the registration statement to register with the SEC the shares of Holdings common stock to be issued to Margo shareholders and to the members of itract. This proxy statement/prospectus is a part of the Registration Statement and constitutes a prospectus of Holdings and a proxy statement of Margo for the Margo annual meeting. As allowed by Commission rules, this proxy statement/prospectus does not contain all the information that shareholders can find in the registration statement or the exhibits to the registration statement. 94
S-4104th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 104th
APPENDIX A AGREEMENT AND PLAN OF MERGER THIS AGREEMENT AND PLAN OF MERGER is made and entered into as of this 21st day of June, 2000, by and between MARGO CARIBE, INC., a Puerto Rico corporation ("Margo"), and iTract, Inc., a Delaware corporation ("iTract" or the "Surviving Corporation"). Margo and iTract are hereinafter collectively referred to as the "Constituent Corporations". WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Margo is a Puerto Rico corporation with its principal place of business in the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico; WHEREAS, iTract is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Margo Farms; WHEREAS, iTract was created to accomplish the reincorporation of Margo Farms as a Puerto Rico corporation pursuant to the merger of the Constituent Corporations; WHEREAS, the Constituent Corporations recognize that the reincorporation may be effected through a merger in accordance with Section 252 of the Delaware General Corporation Law (the "DGCL") and Article 10.02 of the Puerto Rico General Corporation Law of 1995 (the "PRGCL") with iTract as the surviving corporation. NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements set forth herein, the parties hereto hereby agree as follows: 1. Merger. Margo shall merge with and into iTract in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement and the provisions of Section 252 of the DGL and Article 10.02 of PRGCL (the "Merger"). iTract shall be the surviving corporation and shall continue its corporate existence under its current certificate of incorporation filed under the DGCL. Upon the Effective Date (as hereinafter defined), the separate existence of Margo shall cease. 2. Effective Date. The Merger shall become the filing of the appropriate certificates of merger under the DGCL and the PRGCL. 3. Effect of Merger. Upon the Effective Date: (a) Margo and iTract shall become a single corporation and the separate corporate existence of Margo shall cease; (b) The Surviving Corporation shall succeed to and possess all of the rights, privileges, powers and immunities
S-4105th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 105th
of Margo which, together with all of the assets, properties, business, patents, trademarks, and goodwill of Margo, of every type and description wherever located, shall vest in the Surviving Corporation without further act or deed and the title to any real property or other property vested by deed or otherwise in Margo shall not revert or in any way be impaired by reason of the Merger; (c) all rights of creditors and all liens upon any property of the Constituent Corporations shall be unimpaired; The Surviving Corporation shall be subject to all of the contractual restrictions, disabilities and duties of the Constituent Corporations; and all debts, liabilities and obligations of the respective Constituent Corporations shall thereafter attach to the Surviving Corporation and may be enforced against it to the same extent as if said debts, liabilities and obligations had been incurred or contracted by it, provided, however, that nothing herein is intended to or shall extend or enlarge any obligation or the lien of any indenture, agreement or other instrument executed or assumed by the Constituent Corporations; and (d) without limitation of the foregoing provisions of this Section 3, all corporate acts, plans, policies, contracts, approvals and authorizations of the Constituent Corporations, their shareholders, Boards of Directors, committees elected or appointed by the Boards of Directors, officers and agents, which were valid and effective and which did not have terms expressly requiring termination by virtue of the Merger, shall be taken for all purposes as the acts, plans, policies, contracts, approvals and authorizations of the Surviving Corporation as they were with respect to the Constituent Corporations. 4. Certificate of Incorporation; By-laws. At the Effective Date, the Certificate of Incorporation and By-laws of iTract as in effect immediately prior to the Effective Date shall be the Certificate of Incorporation and By-laws of the Surviving Corporation. 5. Directors and Officers. At the Effective Date, the directors and officers of Margo immediately prior to the Effective Date, shall be the directors and offices of the Surviving Corporation until their respective successors shall have been duly elected or appointed. 6. Conversion of Shares and Stock Options. At the Effective Date, each of the following transactions shall be deemed to occur simultaneously: A-2
S-4106th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 106th
(a) Each share of common stock of Margo, $.001 par value ("Margo Common Stock"), authorized and issued immediately prior to the Effective Date shall, by virtue of the Merger and without any action on the part of the holder thereof, be converted into and become one fully paid and nonassessable share of common stock, $.001 par value, of the Surviving Corporation ("iTract Common Stock"); (b) Each share of iTract Common Stock issued and outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Date, all of which are owned by Margo, shall, by virtue of the Merger and without any action on the part of the holder thereof, automatically be canceled. (c) Upon the Effective Date, each option or other right to acquire Margo Common Stock which is issued and outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Date, shall be converted, without any action on the part of the holder thereof, into the right to acquire an equivalent number of the shares of iTract Common Stock, on the same terms and conditions under which such holder could have acquired the shares of Margo Common Stock. 7. Exchange of Securities. (a) After the Effective Date, each certificate theretofore representing authorized and issued shares of Margo Common Stock shall represent the same number of shares of iTract Common Stock. (b) At any time on or after the Effective Date, each holder of certificates theretofore evidencing ownership of shares of Margo Common Stock will be entitled, upon surrender of such certificates to the transfer agent of the Surviving Corporation, to receive in exchange therefor one or more new stock certificates evidencing ownership of the number of shares of iTract Common Stock into which such Margo Common Stock shall have been converted in the Merger. If any certificate representing shares of iTract Common Stock is to be issued in a name other than that in which the certificate so surrendered in exchange therefor is registered, it shall be a condition of the issuance thereof that the certificate so surrendered shall be properly endorsed and otherwise in proper form for transfer and the person requesting such exchange shall pay to the transfer agent any transfer or other taxes required by reason of the issuance of a certificate representing shares of iTract Common Stock in any name other than that of the registered holder of the certificate surrendered, or otherwise required, or shall establish to the A-3
S-4107th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 107th
satisfaction of the transfer agent that such tax has been paid or is not payable. (c) On the Effective Date, the stock transfer books of Margo shall be deemed closed and no transfer of shares of Margo Common Stock then outstanding shall thereafter be made or consummated. 8. Assumption of Stock Option Plan and Stock Option Agreements. On the Effective Date, iTract shall: (a) assume all of the rights and obligations of Margo under the 1988 Stock Benefits Plan and the Stock Option Plan adopted pursuant thereto (the "1988 Plan") and the 1998 Stock Option Plan (the "1998 Plan") of Margo; (b) assume all of the rights and obligations of Margo under any outstanding stock option agreements under the 1988 Plan, the 1998 Plan or otherwise; and (c) reserve a sufficient number of shares of iTract Common Stock to fulfill its obligations under the 1988 Plan, the 1998 Plan and any outstanding stock options. 9. Certificate of Merger. Following the receipt of all required shareholder approval, the parties shall promptly execute the appropriate certificates of merger as required by the DGCL and the PRGCL and file the same with the Secretaries of State of the State of Delaware and the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico. 10. Entire Agreement. This Agreement contains the entire agreement between the parties with respect to the Merger, and supersedes all prior agreements, written or oral, with respect thereto. 11. Further Actions. All necessary action shall be taken to transfer information, contracts, assets, or any other property so that this Agreement be effected pursuant to the provisions included herein. 12. Authorization. The appropriate officers of the Constituent Corporations are authorized for and on behalf of and in the name of the Constituent Corporations to take or cause to be taken all such actions and to execute or cause to be executed such certificates and other documents as may be deemed necessary by them or desirable in order to effectuate this Agreement. 13. Benefits. This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to benefit the parties, their personal representatives, estates, successors and assigns. A-4
S-4108th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 108th
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement on the date first above written. MARGO CARIBE, INC. iTRACT, INC. By: /s/ MICHAEL J. SPECTOR By: /s/ MICHAEL J. SPECTOR -------------------------------- ----------------------------- Michael J. Spector Michael J. Spector Chairman of the Board, President Chief Executive Officer and President A-5
S-4109th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 109th
APPENDIX B AGREEMENT AND PLAN OF MERGER DATED AS OF APRIL 11, 2000 BY AND AMONG MARGO CARIBE, INC., ITRACT ACQUISITION COMPANY, LLC, ITRACT, INC. ITRACT, LLC AND INTERNATIONAL COMMERCE EXCHANGE SYSTEMS, INC.
S-4110th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 110th
AGREEMENT AND PLAN OF MERGER AGREEMENT AND PLAN OF MERGER (this "AGREEMENT") dated as of April 11, 2000, by and among MARGO CARIBE, INC., a Puerto Rico corporation ("MARGO"); iTRACT INC., a Delaware corporation ("PURCHASER"); iTRACT ACQUISITION COMPANY, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company and a wholly-owned subsidiary of Purchaser ("PURCHASER SUBSIDIARY"); iTRACT, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company ("iTRACT"); and INTERNATIONAL COMMERCE EXCHANGE SYSTEMS, INC., a Delaware corporation ("ICES"). W I T N E S S E T H: - - - - - - - - - - WHEREAS, the Boards of Directors of Margo and Purchaser, and the managers of Purchaser Subsidiary and iTract, have determined that it is in the best interests of each such company and its respective stockholders and members for Purchaser Subsidiary to merge with and into iTract (the "iTRACT MERGER") upon the terms and subject to the conditions set forth herein; WHEREAS, the Boards of Directors of Margo and Purchaser have adopted resolutions approving this Agreement and the transactions contemplated hereby; WHEREAS, the managers and a majority of the members of Purchaser Subsidiary and iTract have adopted resolutions approving this Agreement and the transactions contemplated hereby pursuant to Section 18-209 of the Delaware Limited Liability Company Act; WHEREAS, the parties to this Agreement intend that the iTract Merger shall qualify as an exchange within the meaning of Section 351 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended; WHEREAS, ICES is the indirect beneficial owner of approximately 78% of the outstanding interests in iTract; and WHEREAS, prior to the Effective Time (as defined below), Margo will reincorporate in Delaware by merging with and into Purchaser. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the mutual representations, warranties, covenants and agreements hereinafter set forth, the parties hereto do hereby agree as follows: B-1
S-4111th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 111th
1. CERTAIN DEFINITIONS. ------------------- 1.1 DEFINED TERMS. As used in this Agreement, the following terms shall have the meanings specified or referred to below (terms defined in the singular to have the correlative meaning in the plural and VICE VERSA): "ACT" shall mean the Delaware Limited Liability Company Act. "AFFILIATE" of any Person shall mean any Person which, directly or indirectly, controls or is controlled by that Person, or is under common control with that Person. For the purposes of this definition, "control" (including, with correlative meaning, the terms "controlled by" and "under common control with"), as used with respect to any Person, shall mean the possession, directly or indirectly, of the power to direct or cause the direction of the management and policies of such person, whether through the ownership of voting securities or by contract or otherwise. "AGREEMENT" shall have the meaning set forth in the recitals. "ALTERNATIVE TRANSACTION" shall have the meaning set forth in Section 9.8. "ASSET SALE" shall have the meaning set forth in Section 6.4. "BUSINESS DAY" shall mean any day that is not a Saturday or a Sunday or a day on which banks located in New York City are authorized or required to be closed. "CLOSING" shall have the meaning set forth in Section 3.1. "CODE" shall mean the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. All citations to the Code or to the regulations promulgated thereunder shall include any amendments or any substitute or successor provisions thereto. "CONTEMPLATED TRANSACTIONS" shall mean the iTract Merger, the Reincorporation Merger and the Asset Sale, and the execution, delivery and performance of and compliance with this Agreement and all other agreements to be executed and delivered pursuant to this Agreement. "CONTRACT" shall have the meaning set forth in Section 4.15. "EFFECTIVE TIME" shall mean the date and time of consummation of the iTract Merger, as evidenced by the filing of a certificate of merger with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware. "ENCUMBRANCE" shall mean any security interest, pledge, mortgage, lien, charge, encumbrance, license, easement, right-of-way, adverse claim, preferential arrangement or restriction of any kind, including, but not limited to, any restriction on the use, voting, transfer, receipt of income or other exercise of any attributes of ownership. B-2
S-4112th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 112th
"ENVIRONMENTAL LAWS" shall mean any Law, now or hereafter in effect and as amended, and any judicial or administrative interpretation thereof, including any judicial or administrative order, consent decree or judgment, relating to the environment, health, safety or Hazardous Materials, including, without limitation, the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980, as amended through the date hereof; the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, 42 U.S.C. ss.ss 6901 ET SEQ.; the Hazardous Materials Transportation Act, 49 U.S.C. ss.ss 6901 ET SEQ.; the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. ss.ss 1251 ET SEQ.; the Toxic Substances Control Act, 15 U.S.C. ss.ss 2601 ET SEQ.; the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. ss.ss 7401 ET SEQ.; the Safe Drinking Water Act, 42 U.S.C. ss.ss 300f ET SEQ.; the Atomic Energy Act, 42 U.S.C. ss.ss 2011 ET SEQ.; the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act, 7 U.S.C. ss.ss 136 ET SEQ.; the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act, 21 U.S.C. ss.ss 301 ET SEQ.; and the Puerto Rico Public Policy Environmental Act, 12 LPRA ss.ss 1121 ET SEQ. "ERISA" shall mean the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended, and the regulations and publications thereunder. "EXCHANGE ACT" shall mean the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the rules and regulations thereunder. "GAAP" shall mean generally accepted accounting principles in the United States. "GOVERNMENTAL BODY" shall mean any United States federal, state or local, Puerto Rico, or any foreign government, governmental, regulatory or administrative authority, agency or commission or any court, tribunal or judicial or arbitral body or any quasi-governmental or private body exercising any regulatory or taxing authority thereunder. "HAZARDOUS MATERIALS" shall mean (a) petroleum and petroleum products, radioactive materials, asbestos in any form that is or could become friable, urea formaldehyde foam insulation, transformers or other equipment that contain polychlorinated biphenyls, and radon gas, (b) any other chemicals, materials or substances defined as or included in the definition of "hazardous substances," "hazardous wastes," "restricted hazardous wastes," "toxic substances," "toxic pollutants," "contaminants" or "pollutants" or words of similar import, under any applicable Environmental Law, and (c) any other chemical, material or substances exposure to which is regulated by any Governmental Body. "ICES" shall mean International Commerce Exchange Systems, Inc., a Delaware corporation. "INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY" shall mean any and all United States and foreign: (a) inventions, whether or not patentable, whether or not reduced to practice, and whether or not yet made the subject of a pending patent application or applications, (b) ideas and conceptions of potentially patentable subject matter, including, without limitation, any patent disclosures, whether or not reduced to practice and whether or not yet made the subject of a pending patent application or applications, (c) national (including, but not limited to the United States) and multinational statutory invention registrations, patents (including but not limited to design patents), patent B-3
S-4113th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 113th
registrations and patent applications (including all reissues, divisions, continuations, continuations-in-part, extensions and reexaminations) and all rights therein provided by international treaties or conventions and all improvements to the inventions disclosed in each such registration, patent or application, (d) trademarks, service marks, trade dress, logos, trade names and corporate names, whether or not registered and regardless of where used, including but not limited to all common law rights, and registrations and applications for registration thereof, including, but not limited to, all marks registered in the United States Patent and Trademark office, the Trademark Offices of the States and Territories of the United States of America, and the Trademark Offices of other nations throughout the world, and all rights therein provided by international treaties or conventions, (e) copyrights (including but not limited to copyrights on designs) (registered or otherwise) and registrations and applications for registration thereof, and all rights therein provided by any national law, international treaties or conventions, (f) computer software, including, without limitation, source code, operating systems and specifications, data, data bases, files, documentation and other materials related thereto, data and documentation, (g) trade secrets and confidential, technical and business information (including but not limited to ideas, formulas, compositions, inventions, and conceptions of inventions whether patentable or unpatentable and whether or not reduced to practice), (h) whether or not confidential, technology (including know-how and show-how), manufacturing and production processes and techniques, research and development information, drawings, specifications, designs, plans, proposals, technical data, copyrightable works, financial, marketing and business data, pricing and cost information, business and marketing plans and customer and supplier lists and information, (i) any right arising under any law providing protection to industrial or other designs, (j) copies and tangible embodiments of all the foregoing, in whatever form or medium, (k) all rights to obtain and rights to apply for patents, and to register trademarks and copyrights, and (l) all rights to sue or recover and retain damages and costs and attorneys fees for present and past infringement of any of the foregoing. "IRS" means the Internal Revenue Service. "iTRACT" shall mean iTract, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company. "iTRACT APPROVALS" shall have the meaning set forth in Section 4.5. "iTRACT ASSETS" shall have the meaning set forth in Section 4.7(b). "iTRACT INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY" shall have the meaning set forth in Section 4.9. "iTRACT LICENSES" shall have the meaning set forth in Section 4.17(a). "iTRACT MERGER" shall mean the merger of Purchaser Subsidiary with and into iTract, as contemplated by this Agreement. "iTRACT PLANS" shall have the meaning set forth in Section 4.13(a). "iTRACT RECENT BALANCE SHEET: shall have the meaning set forth in Section 4.6(c). B-4
S-4114th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 114th
"iTRACT UNITS" shall have the meaning set forth in Section 2.3(a). "LAWS" shall mean all federal, state, local, regional, municipal or foreign laws, statutes, regulations, ordinances, codes, decrees, judgments, orders or other legal requirements and shall include the Laws of Puerto Rico. "LEASES" shall have the meaning set forth in Section 4.8 "MATERIAL ADVERSE EFFECT" shall mean, when used in connection with any Person, any change, effect, event, occurrence, condition or development that is or is reasonably likely to be materially adverse to (i) the business, assets, liabilities, properties, results of operations, prospects or condition (financial or otherwise) of such Person (excluding industry and general economic changes) or (ii) the ability of such Person to perform its obligations under this Agreement. "MARGO" shall mean Margo Caribe, Inc., a Puerto Rico corporation. "MARGO APPROVALS" shall have the meaning set forth in Section 5.5. "MARGO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS" shall have the meaning set forth in Section 5.7. "MARGO LICENSES" shall have the meaning set forth in Section 5.10. "MARGO PLANS" shall have the meaning set forth in Section 5.9. "MARGO RECENT BALANCE SHEET" shall have the meaning set forth in Section 5.7(b). "MARGO SEC DOCUMENTS" shall have the meaning set forth in Section 5.7(a). "MAXIMUM PURCHASER SHARES" shall have the meaning set forth in Section 2.4. "MEMBERS" shall mean the members of iTract prior to the Effective Time. "MERGER CONSIDERATION" shall have the meaning set forth in Section 2.4. "NASDAQ" shall mean The Nasdaq Stock Market, Inc. "NASDAQ LISTING" shall have the meaning set forth in Section 6.5. "NURSERY BUSINESS ASSETS" shall mean all assets, other than cash and cash equivalents, owned or used by Margo or its Subsidiaries in connection with any of the businesses presently conducted by any of them and shall include the capital stock of Margo's Subsidiaries owned by Margo other than Purchaser and Purchaser Subsidiary. "PARTY" shall mean any of Margo, Purchaser, Purchaser Subsidiary, iTract, the Members, and ICES. B-5
S-4115th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 115th
"PERMITTED ENCUMBRANCES" shall have the meaning set forth in Section 4.7(b). "PERSON" shall mean any individual, corporation, limited liability company, partnership, joint venture, trust, association, unincorporated organization, other entity or Governmental Body. "P.R. INTERNAL REVENUE CODE" shall mean the Puerto Rico Internal Revenue Code of 1994, as amended. All citations to the Puerto Rico Internal Revenue Code shall include any amendments or any substitute or successor provisions thereto. "PURCHASER" shall mean iTract Inc., a Delaware corporation and wholly-owned subsidiary of Margo prior to the Effective Time. "PURCHASER COMMON STOCK" shall mean the common stock, par value $.001 per share, of Purchaser. "PURCHASER SHARES" shall have the meaning set forth in Section 2.4. "PURCHASER SUBSIDIARY" shall mean iTract Acquisition Company, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company. "REGISTRATION STATEMENT" shall have the meaning set forth in Section 6.2. "REINCORPORATION MERGER" shall mean the merger of Margo with and into Purchaser, with Purchaser as the surviving corporation of such merger. "SEC" shall mean the Securities and Exchange Commission. "SECURITIES ACT" shall mean the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. "STOCKHOLDER APPROVAL" shall have the meaning set forth in Section 6.6. on "SUBSIDIARY" shall mean with respect to any specified Person, any other Person (a) whose board of directors or similar governing body, or a majority thereof, may presently be directly or indirectly elected or appointed by such specified Person, (b) whose management decisions and corporate actions are directly or indirectly subject to the present control of such specified Person, or (c) whose voting securities or equity securities are more than fifty percent (50%) owned, directly or indirectly, by such specified Person. "SURVIVING LLC" shall have the meaning set forth in Section 2.1. "TAXES" shall mean all taxes, charges, fees, imposts, levies or other assessments, including, without limitation, all net income, gross receipts, capital, sales, use, ad valorem, value added, transfer, franchise, profits, inventory, capital stock, license, withholding, payroll, B-6
S-4116th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 116th
employment, social security, unemployment, excise, severance, stamp, occupation, property and estimated taxes, customs duties, fees, assessments and charges of any kind whatsoever, together with any interest and any penalties, fines, additions to tax or additional amounts imposed by any Governmental Body and shall include any transferee liability in respect of Taxes. "TAX RETURNS" means any federal, state, local, Puerto Rico, or foreign return, report, information return or other document (including any related or supporting information) filed or required to be filed with any Governmental Body in connection with the determination, assessment or collection of any Taxes or the administration of any laws, regulations or administrative requirements relating to any Taxes. 1.2 REFERENCES TO DOLLARS. References to dollars or "$" in this Agreement shall mean United States dollars. 2. THE iTRACT MERGER. ------------------ 2.1 THE iTRACT MERGER. Upon the terms and subject to the conditions of this Agreement, and in accordance with the provisions of the Act, Purchaser Subsidiary shall be merged with and into iTract as soon as practicable following the satisfaction or waiver of the conditions set forth in Articles 7 and 8 hereof. Following the iTract Merger, iTract shall continue as the surviving limited liability company (the "SURVIVING LLC") under its current name and shall continue its existence under the laws of the State of Delaware and the separate existence of Purchaser Subsidiary shall thereupon cease. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, and subject thereto, at the Effective Time, by virtue of the iTract Merger and without further act or deed, all properties, rights, privileges, powers and franchises of iTract and Purchaser Subsidiary shall vest in the Surviving LLC, and all debts, liabilities, obligations and duties of iTract and Purchaser Subsidiary shall become the debts, liabilities, obligations and duties of the Surviving LLC. 2.2 CONSUMMATION OF THE iTRACT MERGER AND EFFECTIVE TIME. The iTract Merger shall be effected by the filing of a certificate of merger with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware in the form of EXHIBIT A to this Agreement (the "CERTIFICATE OF MERGER"), pursuant to Section 18-209 of the Act. Subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement, the Parties hereto shall take all other actions as may be required by Law to make the iTract Merger effective. 2.3 CONVERSION OR CANCELLATION OF UNITS. The manner of converting or canceling membership interests of iTract or Purchaser Subsidiary in the iTract Merger shall be as follows. At the Effective Time; (a) The units of membership interest of iTract (the "iTRACT UNITS") issued and outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Time shall, by virtue of the iTract Merger and without any action on the part of the holders thereof, be converted into the right to receive the Merger Consideration. At the Effective Time, all iTract Units shall, by virtue of the iTract Merger and without any action on the part of the holders thereof, no longer be outstanding and shall be canceled and retired and shall cease to exist. B-7
S-4117th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 117th
(b) Each of Purchaser Subsidiary's units of membership interest issued and outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Time shall, by virtue of the iTract Merger and without any action on the part of the holder thereof, be converted into one unit of membership interest of the Surviving LLC. 2.4 MERGER CONSIDERATION. The "MERGER CONSIDERATION" shall mean the number of shares of Purchaser Common Stock equal to the difference between: (i) Maximum Purchaser Shares (as defined below); and (ii) the number of shares of Purchaser Common Stock that will be the subject of Purchaser Options pursuant to Section 2.5 below. Each Member shall be entitled to receive its pro rata share of the Merger Consideration (rounded to the nearest whole number of shares of Purchaser Common Stock) based on the proportion that the iTract Units held by such Member immediately prior to Effective Time bears to the total number of issued and outstanding iTract Units at the Effective Time. The Maximum Purchaser Shares shall mean the product of: (i) 0.868; and (ii) the quotient obtained by dividing the sum of (aa) the number of shares of Purchaser Common Stock outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Time, and (bb) the number of shares of Purchaser Common Stock underlying all options, warrants and any other securities convertible into shares of Purchaser Common Stock which are outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Time, by 0.132. The shares of the Purchaser Common Stock which constitute the Merger Consideration are referred to as the "PURCHASER SHARES." 2.5 CONVERSION OF iTRACT OPTIONS. All of the options and warrants to purchase iTract Units (the "iTRACT OPTIONS") outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Time shall, by virtue of the iTract Merger and without any further action on the part of iTract or the holders of such options or warrants, be converted into options or warrants to acquire shares of the Purchaser Common Stock (the "Purchaser Options"). Each Purchaser Option issued in exchange for an iTract Option shall be exercisable for that whole number of shares of Purchaser Common Stock (to the nearest whole share) that a holder of the number of iTract Units subject to such iTract Option immediately prior to the Effective Time would be entitled to receive under Section 2.4 hereof. The aggregate purchase price for the shares of Purchaser Common Stock subject to each Purchaser Option issued in exchange for an iTract Option shall be the same as the aggregate purchase price for the iTract Units subject to the corresponding iTract Option immediately prior to the Effective Time. Purchaser agrees that as soon as practicable after the Effective Time it will cause to be filed one or more registration statements on Form S-8 under the Securities Act in order to register the shares of Purchaser Common Stock issuable upon exercise of the converted iTract Options (if such shares may be registered on Form S-8). 2.6 CERTIFICATE OF FORMATION AND LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY AGREEMENT. The Certificate of Formation of iTract shall be and remain the Certificate of Formation of the Surviving LLC. On the Effective Date, the limited liability company agreement of the Surviving LLC shall be in the form annexed hereto as EXHIBIT B. 2.7 MANAGERS AND OFFICERS. --------------------- (a) At the Effective Time, the managers and officers of the Surviving LLC shall be the managers and officers of iTract immediately prior to the Merger. B-8
S-4118th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 118th
(b) At the Effective Time, the directors and officers of the Purchaser shall resign as directors and officers of the Purchaser and shall appoint as their successors the Persons to be designated by iTract. 3. THE CLOSING. ----------- 3.1 CLOSING. -------- (a) Unless this Agreement shall have been terminated pursuant to Section 10.1, a closing of the iTract Merger (the "Closing") will be held at the offices of Kronish Lieb Weiner & Hellman LLP, 1114 Avenue of the Americas, New York, New York 10036, five (5) Business Days after the date on which the conditions set forth in Sections 7 and 8 shall be satisfied or duly waived (or such other place and date as Purchaser and iTract may agree in writing). (b) At the Closing: (1) iTract and the Members, as applicable, shall deliver to Purchaser or Purchaser Subsidiary, as applicable, all documents contemplated by Article 7, to the extent not theretofore delivered. (2) Purchaser or Purchaser Subsidiary, as applicable, shall deliver to iTract all documents contemplated by Article 8, to the extent not theretofore delivered. (3) Purchaser shall deliver to the Members certificates representing the Purchaser Shares. 4. REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES OF iTRACT . ----------------------------------------- iTract represents and warrants to Margo, Purchaser and Purchaser Subsidiary as follows: 4.1 ORGANIZATION AND GOOD STANDING. iTract is a limited liability company duly organized, validly existing and in good standing under the laws of the State of Delaware. iTract has all requisite corporate power to own, operate and lease its properties and carry on its business as the same is now being conducted and as currently proposed to be conducted. Complete and correct copies of the certificate of formation and limited liability company agreement of iTract as currently in effect have been delivered to Margo. iTract has no Subsidiaries nor does it own any equity interest in, or control directly or indirectly, any other entity. 4.2 CAPITALIZATION OF iTRACT. ------------------------ (a) iTract has issued 10,728,700 iTract Units, all of which are fully paid and non-assessable. Except as set forth on SCHEDULE 4.2(A), there are no outstanding subscriptions, options, B-9
S-4119th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 119th
rights, warrants, convertible securities, pre-emptive rights or other agreements (other than this Agreement) or calls, demands or commitments of any kind relating to the issuance, sale or transfer of any membership interests or other equity securities of iTract, whether directly or upon the exercise or conversion of other securities. There are no outstanding contractual obligations of iTract to repurchase, redeem or otherwise acquire any interests in iTract or to provide funds to, or make any investments (in the form of a loan, capital contribution or otherwise), in any other Person. All of the outstanding iTract Units were issued in compliance with all applicable federal and state securities laws. (b) SCHEDULE 4.2(B) sets forth the name of each Person owning iTract Units and the number of iTract Units owned by such Person. 4.3 AUTHORITY RELATIVE TO AGREEMENT. iTract has all requisite power and authority, to execute, deliver and perform its obligations under this Agreement, and has taken all action necessary in order to execute and deliver this Agreement and to consummate the Contemplated Transactions. This Agreement has been duly executed and delivered by iTract. This Agreement constitutes the valid and binding obligation of iTract, enforceable against iTract in accordance with its terms, subject to laws relating to bankruptcy, insolvency, fraudulent conveyance, reorganization, moratorium, marshaling or other laws and rules of law affecting the enforcement generally of creditors' rights and remedies (including such as may deny giving effect to waivers of debtors' or guarantors' rights). 4.4 ABSENCE OF CONFLICT. Neither the execution and delivery of this Agreement nor the consummation of the Contemplated Transactions will (a) violate, conflict with, result in a material breach or termination of, constitute a default under or give rise to a right to terminate or accelerate (or an event which, with notice or lapse of time or both, would constitute the same) (i) any material agreement, commitment, deed of trust, indenture, lease, mortgage or other instrument to which iTract is a party or by which any of its properties or assets is bound, (ii) the certificate of formation or limited liability company agreement of iTract, or (iii) any Law, order of a Governmental Body or any other restriction of any kind or character applicable to iTract or any of its properties or assets, or (b) result in the creation or imposition of any Encumbrance upon any properties or assets of iTract under any material agreement or commitment to which iTract is a party or by which iTract or its properties or assets may be bound, except, in each of the foregoing cases, for such items as would not constitute a Material Adverse Effect with respect to iTract. 4.5 CONSENTS AND APPROVALS; EFFECT OF CHANGE IN CONTROL. SCHEDULE 4.5 sets forth a complete list of all consents, waivers, registrations, certificates, approvals, grants, franchises, concessions, permits, licenses, exceptions or authorizations of, or declarations or filings with, or notices or reports to, (a) any Governmental Body and (b) any other Person (including, but not limited to, any party to a Contract or other agreement or commitment of iTract) (collectively, the "iTRACT APPROVALS"), which iTract must obtain or make in order to consummate the Contemplated Transactions. All iTract Approvals have been obtained and are in full force and effect, and Purchaser is in full compliance with each of such iTract Approvals. 4.6 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. -------------------- B-10
S-4120th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 120th
(a) Attached to this Agreement as SCHEDULE 4.6(A) are true and correct copies of the statements of operations and cash flows of iTract for the period from inception through June 30, 1999, for the six month period ended December 31, 1999 and for the eight month period ended February 29, 2000, and balance sheets as of June 30, 1999, December 31, 1999 and February 29, 2000 (collectively the "iTRACT FINANCIAL STATEMENTS"). (b) The iTract Financial Statements comply as to form in all material respects with applicable accounting requirements and have been prepared in conformity with GAAP consistently applied (except as may be indicated in the notes thereto or, in the case of unaudited financial statements, as permitted by the rules and regulations of the SEC) and present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of iTract at the dates thereof and the results of its operations and cash flows for the periods then ended (subject in the case of unaudited interim financial statements to normal recurring year-end audit adjustments). (c) Except as set forth in SCHEDULE 4.6(C), iTract does not have any liabilities or obligations (whether known or unknown, absolute, accrued, contingent or otherwise and whether due or to become due) that were not fully reflected or reserved against in the balance sheet of iTract as of February 29, 2000 (the "iTRACT RECENT BALANCE SHEET") except for non-material liabilities and obligations incurred in the ordinary course of business and consistent with past practice (in nature and scope) since the date thereof. The reserves reflected in the iTract Recent Balance Sheet are adequate, appropriate and reasonable and the reserves reflected in the iTract Recent Balance Sheet are in accordance with GAAP consistently applied. Since the date of the iTract Recent Balance Sheet, there has been no change in the business, operations or financial condition of iTract which has or could reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect with respect to iTract. 4.7 TITLE TO PROPERTY; SUFFICIENCY; ENCUMBRANCES. -------------------------------------------- (a) iTract has never owned any real property. (b) Except for those properties or assets leased by iTract (each of which is listed in Schedule 4.8(a)), or as disclosed in SCHEDULE 4.7(B), iTract owns all the properties and assets used in the conduct of its business and, with respect to contract rights, is a party to and enjoys the right to the benefits of all material contracts, agreements and other arrangements used by iTract in the conduct of its business (all such properties, assets and contract rights being the "iTRACT ASSETS"). iTract has good and marketable title to all the iTract Assets, free and clear of all Encumbrances, except for Permitted Encumbrances. As used herein, "PERMITTED ENCUMBRANCES" means (i) statutory liens for current taxes or assessments not yet due or delinquent, and (ii) those Encumbrances disclosed on SCHEDULE 4.7(B). (c) Following the consummation of the Contemplated Transactions, the Surviving LLC will continue to own the iTract Assets without incurring any penalty or other adverse consequence, including, without limitation, any increase in royalties, or licenses or other fees imposed as a result of, or arising from, the consummation of the Contemplated Transactions. Immediately following the Effective Time, the Surviving LLC shall own and possess all documents, B-11
S-4121st Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 121st
books, records, agreements and financial data of any sort used by iTract in the conduct of its business. 4.8 LEASED PROPERTY. --------------- (a) SCHEDULE 4.8 sets forth a true and complete list of each lease under which iTract is a lessee or lessor (each, a "LEASE"). iTract has delivered to Purchaser complete and correct copies of each such Lease. Each such Lease is a valid and binding obligation of iTract, enforceable in accordance with its terms, is in full force and effect, and except as set forth on SCHEDULE 4.8, upon consummation of the Contemplated Transactions, will continue to entitle the Surviving LLC to the use and possession of the property specified in such lease for the purposes for which such property is now being used by iTract, without incurring any penalty or other adverse consequence, including without limitation, any increase in rentals or other fees imposed as a result of or arising from the consummation of the Contemplated Transactions. (b) There is not under any of such Leases any material default or any claim of a material default by iTract. 4.9 INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS. ---------------------------- (a) SCHEDULE 4.9 sets forth a list and brief description of all Intellectual Property owned or licensed or used or held for use by iTract, specifying as to each, as applicable: (i) the nature of such right, (ii) the owner of such right and (iii) the jurisdiction in which registration has been issued or applied for with respect to such right, including the respective registration or application numbers. iTract owns or possesses adequate licenses or rights to use all Intellectual Property necessary to the conduct of its business as presently conducted and as proposed to be conducted as of the date hereof, and no claim is pending or, to the knowledge of iTract, threatened to the effect that the operations of iTract infringe upon or conflict with the asserted rights of any other Person under any Intellectual Property and, to the knowledge of iTract, there is no reasonable basis for any such claim (whether or not pending or threatened). No claim is pending or, to the knowledge of iTract, threatened to the effect that any such Intellectual Property owned or licensed by iTract or by which iTract otherwise has the right to use, is invalid or unenforceable by iTract, and, to the knowledge of iTract, there is no reasonable basis for any such claim (whether or not pending or threatened). iTract has taken reasonable steps to establish and maintain the confidentiality of all manufacturing processes, formulae, trade secrets, customers lists and know how of iTract, and, to the knowledge of iTract, all such items have remained confidential. SCHEDULE 4.9 also contains a list of all licenses and sublicenses and all consulting software development and other agreements relating to any Intellectual Property of iTract, including the identity of all parties thereto. iTract is not nor will it be as a result of the execution and delivery of this Agreement and the consummation of the Contemplated Transactions, in violation of any license, sublicense or agreement described in SCHEDULE 4.9. (b) The Intellectual Property owned by iTract or, for which iTract is the exclusive licensee, are free and clear of all liens and encumbrances of every nature, are not currently being challenged in any way, have not lapsed or expired, and are not involved in any pending or, to the B-12
S-4122nd Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 122nd
knowledge of iTract, threatened interference proceedings. SCHEDULE 4.9 sets forth all challenges to or any pending or threatened interference proceedings relating to Intellectual Property known to iTract. (c) Neither iTract nor any of its Affiliates has during the preceding 5 years been sued or charged in writing with or have been a defendant in any claim, suit, action or proceeding that involved a claim of infringement of any of the Intellectual Property of iTract. iTract has no knowledge of any other claim of infringement by iTract and no knowledge of any continuing unauthorized use, misappropriation or infringement by any party of any Intellectual Property of iTract. No Intellectual Property of iTract is subject to any outstanding order, judgment, decree, stipulation or agreement restricting the use thereof by iTract or restricting the licensing thereof by iTract to any other party. Other than as set forth in SCHEDULE 4.9, iTract has not entered into any agreement to indemnify any other person against any charge of infringement of any Intellectual Property of iTract. (d) As of April 18, 2000, none of the present or former employees, officers and directors of iTract or their Affiliates will own, directly or indirectly, in whole or in part, any Intellectual Property of iTract or application therefor as set forth in SCHEDULE 4.9. 4.10 LITIGATION. There is no action, suit, inquiry, proceeding or investigation by or before any court or Governmental Body pending or threatened against or involving iTract, which questions or challenges the validity of this Agreement or the Contemplated Transactions, and iTract has not received any notice of any event or occurrence which could result in any such action, suit, inquiry, proceeding or investigation nor, to the knowledge of iTract, is there any valid basis for any such action, suit, inquiry, proceeding or investigation. 4.11 TAX MATTERS. iTract elected to be treated as a partnership for federal income tax purposes upon its inception and has not changed such election since such time. Except as set forth on SCHEDULE 4.11, all Tax Returns required to be filed by iTract on or before the Effective Time by or on behalf of or with respect to iTract have been or will be timely filed on or before the Effective Time in accordance with all applicable laws. iTract is not delinquent in the payment of any Tax nor has iTract requested any extension of time within which to file any Tax Return, which Return has not since been timely filed. No deficiency for any Tax or claim for additional Taxes has been proposed, asserted or assessed by any Governmental Body against iTract. There is no audit, action, suit, claim, proceeding or, any investigation or inquiry, whether formal or informal, public or private, now pending or, to the knowledge of iTract, threatened against or with respect to iTract in respect of any Tax. There are no liens for Taxes upon the assets of iTract except liens for current Taxes not yet due. 4.12 ABSENCE OF CERTAIN CHANGES OR EVENTS. Since December 31, 1999, except as set forth in SCHEDULE 4.12, iTract has conducted its business only in the ordinary course and there has not been: (i) any material adverse change in the financial condition, operations, properties, assets, liabilities or business of iTract; B-13
S-4123rd Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 123rd
(ii) any material damage, destruction or loss of any material properties of iTract; and (iii) any occurrence not included in paragraphs (i) through (ii) of this Section which has resulted or, in which iTract has reason to believe could reasonably be expected to result, in a Material Adverse Effect. 4.13 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS; EXECUTIVE OFFICERS; LABOR. -------------------------------------------- (a) No employees of iTract are covered by collective bargaining agreements or are members of unions. SCHEDULE 4.13 sets forth a true and complete list of all written executive compensation plans, bonus plans, incentive compensation plans, deferred compensation plans or agreements, employee pension plans or retirement plans, employee profit sharing plans, employee stock purchase plans, group life insurance, hospitalization insurance, severance or other employee benefit plans (as defined in Section 3(3) of ERISA) of iTract (the "iTRACT PLANS") providing for benefits for any employees of iTract. iTract has no unfunded obligations relating to the iTract Plans. To the extent applicable, the iTract Plans comply in all material respects with ERISA. (b) Except as set forth in SCHEDULE 4.13, neither the execution and delivery of this Agreement nor the consummation of any of the Contemplated Transactions under this Agreement will entitle any current or former employee of iTract to severance pay or other similar payment or accelerate the time of payment or increase the amount or compensation due to any such employee or former employee. iTract has no pending or, to the knowledge of iTract, threatened labor disputes with its employees. 4.14 INSURANCE; CLAIMS. SCHEDULE 4.14 sets forth a true, correct and complete list of all insurance policies of any kind or nature maintained as of the date of this Agreement by or on behalf of iTract and relating to its business and/or assets, indicating the type of coverage, name of insured, name of insurance carrier or underwriter, premium thereon, policy limits and expiration date of each policy. All such insurance policies are in full force and effect, and iTract is not in default with respect to its obligations under any such insurance policy and no notice of cancellation or termination has been received with respect to any such policy. 4.15 MATERIAL CONTRACTS AND COMMITMENTS. SCHEDULE 4.15 contains a true, complete and accurate list of all of the material contracts, agreements, understandings or other obligations (whether written or oral) to which iTract is a party or by which any of its assets or properties are bound (together with the agreements disclosed on SCHEDULES 4.8, 4.9, 4.13, and 4.14 a "CONTRACT"), including, but not limited to: (a) all rental or use agreements, contracts, covenants or obligations; B-14
S-4124th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 124th
(b) any contract, agreement, commitment or obligation to make any capital expenditures; (c) contracts, agreements, commitments or other obligations with any Person containing any provision or covenant limiting the ability of iTract to engage in any line of business or to compete with or to obtain products or services from any Person or limiting the ability of any Person to compete with or to provide products or services to, or obtain products or services from, iTract, or covering indemnification of another Person; (d) any profit-sharing or similar contract, agreement, understanding or obligation with any Person; (e) contracts, agreements, commitments or other obligations with respect to the purchase or sale by or to iTract of any product, equipment, facility, or similar item; (f) license, royalty, franchise, distributorship, dealer, service, sales agency, consulting, advisory, public relations or advertising contracts, agreements, commitments or other obligations; (g) contracts, agreements, commitments or other obligations to provide services or facilities with a value in excess of $5,000 per annum by or to iTract or to or by another Person; (h) all joint ventures and joint marketing agreements; or (i) all other material contracts, agreements, commitments, or other obligations whether or not made in the ordinary course of business. 4.16 STATUS OF AGREEMENTS. All Contracts to which iTract is a party are in full force and effect and constitute valid and binding obligations of iTract and, to the knowledge of iTract, are binding on the other parties thereto. There are no existing material defaults (or events which, with notice or lapse of time or both, would constitute a default) by iTract or any other party thereunder. iTract is not a party to any Contract that has or may reasonably be expected to have, individually or in the aggregate, with any other Contracts a Material Adverse Effect on iTract. 4.17 COMPLIANCE WITH LAW. ------------------- (a) SCHEDULE 4.17(A) is a true and complete list of each license, permit, order, authorization or approval of Governmental Bodies ("iTRACT LICENSES") held or obtained by iTract which is required in connection with the business conducted by iTract. The operations of iTract have been conducted in all material respects in accordance with all applicable Laws. iTract has not received any notification of any asserted present or past failure to comply with any such Laws. iTract has all iTract Licenses required for the conduct of iTract's business and is not in violation of any such iTract License. All such iTract Licenses are in full force and effect and no suspension or cancellation thereof has been threatened of which iTract is aware. B-15
S-4125th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 125th
(b) iTract has obtained all iTract Licenses which are required with respect to iTract under all Environmental Laws. iTract is in compliance in all material respects with all terms and conditions of such required iTract Licenses, and is also in compliance in all material respects with all Environmental Laws. Except as set forth in SCHEDULE 4.17(B), there does not exist as a result of any action or inaction of iTract or, to the knowledge of iTract, as a result of any action or inaction of any other Person, nor has iTract received notice of, any events, condition or circumstances which may interfere with or prevent continued compliance, or which may give rise to any liability, or otherwise form the basis of any claim, action, suit, proceedings, hearing or investigation, based on or related to the violation of an Environmental Law or the manufacture, processing, distribution, use, treatment, storage, disposal, transport, or handling, or the emission, discharge, release or threatened release into the environment, of any Hazardous Material. (c) To the best of iTract's knowledge, no Hazardous Material has been incorporated in, used on, stored on or under, released from, treated on, transported to or from, or disposed of by iTract on or from any property owned or leased by iTract or by any other Person such that, under Environmental Laws (i) any such Hazardous Material would be required to be removed, cleaned up or remediated before the property owned or leased by iTract could be altered, renovated, demolished or transferred, or (ii) the owner or lessee of the property (as applicable to iTract) could be subjected to liability for the removal, clean up or remediation of such Hazardous Material; and iTract has not received notification from any Governmental Bodies or other Persons relating to Hazardous Material on or affecting any property owned or leased by iTract or relating to any potential or known liability under Environmental Laws arising from the ownership or leasing of any property. 4.18 NO BROKERS OR FINDERS. Except as set forth on SCHEDULE 4.18, iTract has not, and its Affiliates, officers, directors or employees have not, employed any broker or finder or incurred any liability for any brokerage or finder's fee or commissions or similar payment in connection with any of the Contemplated Transactions. 4.19 REGISTRATION STATEMENT. None of the information to be supplied by iTract in writing for inclusion in the Registration Statement or any amendments thereof or supplements thereto, at the time of the filing of the Registration Statement, as amended or supplemented, or at the time it becomes effective, will contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state any material fact required to be stated therein or necessary in order to make the statements therein, in light of the circumstances under which they are made, not misleading; PROVIDED, that Margo shall furnish the Registration Statement and any amendments or supplements thereto to iTract for its review a reasonable period (and in no case less than 24 hours) prior to the filing of same with the SEC and prior to the distribution thereof. 4.20 TAX REPORTING. Consistent with the intent of the parties hereto, iTract shall treat, and cause their Affiliates to so treat, the iTract Merger as an exchange under Section 351 with respect to all Tax Returns, to the extent consistent with Law. 4.21 DISCLOSURE. No representations or warranties by iTract in this Agreement and no statement contained in any schedules, exhibits or certificates furnished or to be furnished by iTract B-16
S-4126th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 126th
to Margo, Purchaser or Purchaser Subsidiary or any of their representatives pursuant to the provisions hereof, contains or will contain any untrue statement of material fact or omits or will omit to state any material fact necessary, in light of the circumstances under which it was made, in order to make the statements herein or therein not misleading. Documents delivered or to be delivered by iTract to Margo, Purchaser or Purchaser Subsidiary pursuant to this Agreement are or will be true and complete copies of what they purport to be. 5. REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES OF MARGO, PURCHASER AND ------------------------------------------------------ PURCHASER SUBSIDIARY. --------------------- Margo, Purchaser and Purchaser Subsidiary hereby, jointly and severally, represent and warrant to iTract as follows: 5.1 ORGANIZATION AND GOOD STANDING. Margo is a corporation duly organized, validly existing and in good standing under the laws of Puerto Rico. Purchaser is a corporation duly organized, validly existing and in good standing under the laws of the State of Delaware. Purchaser Subsidiary is a limited liability company duly organized, validly existing and in good standing under the laws of the State of Delaware. Each of Margo, Purchaser and Purchaser Subsidiary has the requisite corporate power to own, operate and lease its properties and carry on its business as the same is now being conducted, and following the Reincorporation Merger, Purchaser will have all requisite corporate power to own, operate and lease its properties and carry on its business as the same are then being conducted. Complete and correct copies of the certificate of incorporation and bylaws of Margo and Purchaser, and complete and correct copies of the certificate of formation and limited liability company agreement of Purchaser Subsidiary, as currently in effect, have been delivered to iTract. Other than the Subsidiaries set forth on SCHEDULE 5.1, Margo has no Subsidiaries. 5.2 CAPITALIZATION. -------------- (a) The authorized capital stock of Margo consists of (i) 10,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $.001 per share, of which 1,882,322 shares are issued and outstanding as of the date of this Agreement and are fully paid and non-assessable (ii) 250,000 shares of preferred stock, par value $.01 per share, of which no shares are outstanding. Except as set forth on SCHEDULE 5.2(A), there are no outstanding subscriptions, options, rights, warrants, convertible securities, preemptive rights or other agreements (other than this Agreement) or calls, demands or commitments of any kind relating to the issuance of any capital stock or other equity securities of Margo, whether directly or upon the exercise or conversion of other securities. There are no outstanding contractual obligations of Margo to repurchase, redeem or otherwise acquire any shares of Margo's capital stock or to provide funds to, or make any investment (in the form of a loan, capital contribution or B-17
S-4127th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 127th
otherwise) in, any other Person. All of the outstanding securities of Margo were issued in compliance with all applicable federal and state securities laws. (b) The authorized capital stock of Purchaser consists of (i) 100,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $.001 per share, of which 10 shares are issued and outstanding as of the date of this Agreement, are fully paid and non-assessable and owned by Margo, and (ii) 5,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value $.01 per share, of which no shares are currently outstanding or will be outstanding at the Effective Time. Except as set forth on SCHEDULE 5.2(B), there are no outstanding subscriptions, options, rights, warrants, convertible securities, preemptive rights or other agreements (other than this Agreement) or calls, demands or commitments of any kind relating to the issuance, sale or transfer of any capital stock or other equity securities of Purchaser, whether directly or upon the exercise or conversion of other securities. There are no outstanding contractual obligations of Purchaser to repurchase, redeem or otherwise acquire any shares of Purchaser's capital stock or to provide funds to, or make any investment (in the form of a loan, capital contribution or otherwise) in, any other Person. (c) Purchaser owns 100% of the membership interests of Purchaser Subsidiary and has no other Subsidiaries. (d) All of the Purchaser Shares to be issued to the Members in the Merger will, as of the Effective Time, be duly authorized and validly issued, fully paid and nonassessable. 5.3 AUTHORITY RELATIVE TO AGREEMENT. Each of Margo, Purchaser and Purchaser Subsidiary, as applicable, has all requisite power and authority, corporate or otherwise, to execute, deliver and perform their obligations under this Agreement and has taken all action necessary, corporate or otherwise, in order to execute and deliver this Agreement. This Agreement has been duly executed and delivered by Margo, Purchaser and Purchaser Subsidiary. This Agreement constitutes the valid and binding obligations of Margo, Purchaser and Purchaser Subsidiary, as applicable, enforceable against Margo, Purchaser and Purchaser Subsidiary in accordance with its terms, subject to laws relating to bankruptcy, insolvency, fraudulent conveyance, reorganization, moratorium, marshaling or other laws and rules of law affecting the enforcement generally of creditors' rights and remedies (including such as may deny giving effect to waivers of debtors' or guarantors' rights). 5.4 ABSENCE OF CONFLICT. Except as listed on SCHEDULE 5.4, neither the execution and delivery of this Agreement nor the consummation of the Contemplated Transactions will (a) violate, conflict with, result in a breach or termination of, constitute a default under or give rise to a right to terminate or accelerate (or an event which, with notice or lapse of time or both, would constitute the same) (i) any agreement, commitment, deed of trust, indenture, lease, mortgage or other instrument to which Margo, Purchaser and Purchaser Subsidiary is a party or by which any of their respective properties or assets are bound; (ii) the certificate of incorporation or bylaws of Margo or Purchaser or the certificate of formation or limited liability company agreement of Purchaser Subsidiary or (iii) any Law, order of a Governmental Body or any other restriction of any kind or character applicable to Margo, Purchaser and Purchaser Subsidiary or any of their respective properties or assets; except, B-18
S-4128th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 128th
in each of such cases, for such items as would not constitute, in the aggregate, a Material Adverse Effect with respect to Margo, Purchaser or Purchaser Subsidiary, as the case may be. 5.5 CONSENTS AND APPROVALS; EFFECT OF CHANGE IN CONTROL. SCHEDULE 5.5 sets forth a complete list of all consents, waivers, registrations, certificates, approvals, grants, franchises, concessions, permits, licenses, exceptions or authorizations of, or declarations or filings with, or notices or reports to, (a) any Governmental Body and (b) any other Person (including, but not limited to, any party to a contract or other agreement or commitment of Margo) (collectively, the "MARGO APPROVALS"), which Margo or Purchaser must make or obtain in order to consummate the Contemplated Transactions. Except as set forth in SCHEDULE 5.5, there are no contracts or Margo Approvals by which Margo or any of its assets or properties may be bound that contain any change in control provisions that will become applicable or inapplicable as a result of the consummation of the Contemplated Transactions. 5.6 TAX MATTERS. ----------- (a) Margo and its Subsidiaries have filed or caused to be filed on a timely basis all Tax Returns that are or were required to be filed by or with respect to them, their operations and their assets through the Effective Time, pursuant to the Laws or administrative requirements of each Governmental Body with taxing power over it or its assets. As of the time of filing, such Tax Returns correctly reflected the facts regarding the income, business, assets, operations, activities, status, and other matters of Margo and its Subsidiaries and any other information required to be shown thereon. In particular, such Tax Returns are not subject to penalties under Section 6662 of the Code or any predecessor provision of law or any other provision of the Code. An extension of time within which to file any Tax Return that has not been filed has not been requested or granted. Margo and its Subsidiaries have delivered to Purchaser true, complete and correct copies of all federal, state, local or foreign income Tax Returns filed by them since formation. SCHEDULE 5.6(A) lists all state, local and foreign jurisdictions in which Margo and its Subsidiaries have previously filed or currently file Tax Returns, which are all of the state, local or foreign taxing jurisdictions in which Margo and its Subsidiaries have been or are required to file Tax Returns. (b) With respect to all amounts in respect of Taxes imposed on Margo and its Subsidiaries or for which Margo and its Subsidiaries are or could be liable, whether to Governmental Bodies (as, for example, under law) or to other persons or entities (as, for example, under tax allocation agreements), with respect to all taxable periods or portions of periods through the Effective Time, (i) all applicable tax laws and agreements have been fully complied with, (ii) all such amounts required to be paid by Margo and its Subsidiaries to Governmental Bodies or others on or before the date hereof have been paid, except such taxes, if any, as are set forth in SCHEDULE 5.6(B) and are being contested in good faith and as to which adequate reserves (determined in accordance with GAAP consistently applied) have been provided in the Financial Statements, and (iii) reserves have been established for the payment of all Taxes not yet due and payable, which reserves are reflected on the Preliminary Balance Sheet and are adequate and in accordance with the past custom and practice of Margo and its Subsidiaries. B-19
S-4129th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 129th
(c) As of the date hereof, none of Margo and its Subsidiaries have requested, executed or filed with the IRS or any other Governmental Body any agreement or other document extending or having the effect of extending the period for assessment or collection of any Taxes for which Margo and its Subsidiaries could be liable. (d) There exists no proposed tax assessment against Margo and its Subsidiaries nor any lien for Taxes against any property of Margo and its Subsidiaries except as disclosed in the Margo Financial Statements or on SCHEDULE 5.6(d). (e) All Taxes that Margo and its Subsidiaries are or were required by law to withhold or collect have been duly withheld or collected and, to the extent required, have been paid to the proper Governmental Body or other Person. (f) Margo and its Subsidiaries are not, were not and will not be a party to, bound by or subject to any obligation under any tax sharing, tax indemnity, tax allocation or similar agreement. (g) There is no claim, audit, action, suit, proceeding, or investigation with respect to Taxes due or claimed to be due from Margo and its Subsidiaries or of any Tax Return filed or required to be filed by Margo and its Subsidiaries pending or threatened against or with respect to Margo and its Subsidiaries. (h) Margo and its Subsidiaries have not made, and are not parties to any agreement requiring them to make, any payment which would not be deductible under Code Section 280G or which would be subject to the excise tax imposed by Code Section 4999. (i) Margo and its Subsidiaries have not executed or entered into any closing agreement pursuant to Section 7121 of the Code or any corresponding provision of state, local, Puerto Rico or foreign income tax law. (j) Margo and its Subsidiaries have not filed a consent pursuant to Section 341(f) of the Code (or any corresponding provision of state, local or foreign income tax law) or agreed to have Section 341(f)(2) of the Code (or any corresponding provision of state, local, Puerto Rico or foreign income tax law) apply to any disposition of a subsection (f) asset (as such term is defined in Section 341(f)(4) of the Code) owned by Margo and its Subsidiaries. (k) Margo and its Subsidiaries (i) have not agreed to or are not required to make any adjustment pursuant to Section 481(a) of the Code (or any corresponding provision of state, local, Puerto Rico or foreign income tax law) by reason of a change in accounting method initiated by a Tax Affiliate, (ii) are not aware that the IRS or any Governmental Body has proposed any such adjustment or change in accounting method that relates to the business and operations of Margo and its Subsidiaries, or (iii) have no application pending with any Governmental Body requesting permission for any change in accounting method that relates to the business and operations of Margo and its Subsidiaries. B-20
S-4130th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 130th
(l) Except as Set forth in SCHEDULE 5.4(L), Margo and its Subsidiaries do not hold any debt instrument with respect to which they are reporting the income under the installment method or that has an adjusted basis that is less than 90 percent of the stated redemption price at maturity. (m) Margo and its Subsidiaries have no liability for the Taxes of any person under Treas. Reg. ss. 1.1502-6, as a transferee or successor, or otherwise. (n) All material elections with respect to Taxes affecting Margo and its Subsidiaries as of the date hereof are set forth in SCHEDULE 5.6(N). After the date hereof, no election with respect to Taxes will be made without the written consent of Purchaser, which may not be unreasonably withheld or delayed. (o) None of the assets of Margo and its Subsidiaries is required to be treated as owned by any other person pursuant to the "safe harbor lease" provisions of former Section 168(f)(8) of the Code or otherwise pursuant to the Code. (p) None of the assets of Margo and its Subsidiaries directly or indirectly secures any debt the interest on which is tax-exempt under Section 103(a) of the Code. (q) None of the assets of Margo and its Subsidiaries are "tax-exempt use property" within the meaning of Section 168(h) of the Code. (r) Margo and its Subsidiaries have not participated in or will not participate in an international boycott within the meaning of Section 999 of the Code. (s) Neither Margo nor any of its Subsidiaries is and has been a United States real property holding corporation (as defined in Section 897(c)(2) of the Code) during the applicable period specified in Section 897(c)(1)(A)(ii) of the Code. (t) The transaction contemplated herein is not subject to the tax withholding provisions of Section 3406 of the Code, Subchapter A of Chapter 3 of the Code, or any other provision of state, local, Puerto Rico or foreign law. (u) Margo and its Subsidiaries have not had either a permanent establishment in any foreign country (other than Puerto Rico), as defined in any applicable tax treaty or convention between the United States and such foreign country, or business activity in any country other than the United States that would subject it to a Tax in such country that would not apply to a United States person without a business activity in such country. (v) Except as set forth in SCHEDULE 5.6(V), neither Margo nor any of its Subsidiaries is a party to any joint venture, partnership, or other arrangement or contract that could be treated as a partnership for federal or Puerto Rico income tax purposes. B-21
S-4131st Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 131st
(w) Margo and its Subsidiaries do not file Tax Returns that are combined, consolidated, unitary or otherwise joined with the tax reporting obligations of any other Person. 5.7 SEC DOCUMENTS: FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. ----------------------------------- (a) As of their respective filing dates (i) each quarterly and other report and registration statement (without exhibits) filed by Margo since December 31, 1995 (the "MARGO SEC DOCUMENTS"), complied in all material respects with the applicable requirements of the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, as the case may be, and (ii) none of the Margo SEC Documents contained any untrue statement of a material fact or omitted to state a material fact required to be stated therein or necessary to make the statements made therein, in light of the circumstances in which they were made, not misleading. The financial statements of Margo included in the Margo SEC Documents (the "MARGO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS") comply as to form in all material respects with applicable accounting requirements and with the published rules and regulations of the SEC with respect thereto, have been prepared in conformity with GAAP consistently applied (except as may be indicated in the notes thereto or, in the case of unaudited financial statements, as permitted by the rules and regulations of the SEC) and present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Margo and its consolidated subsidiaries at the dates thereof and the consolidated results of their operations and cash flows for the periods then ended (subject, in the case of unaudited statements, to normal, recurring and certain non-recurring audit adjustments). (b) Margo does not have any liabilities or obligations (whether known or unknown, absolute, accrued, contingent or otherwise and whether due or to become due) that were not fully reflected or reserved against in the consolidated balance sheet of Margo as of December 31, 1999 (the "MARGO RECENT BALANCE SHEET") except for non-material liabilities and obligations incurred in the ordinary course of business and consistent with past practice (in nature and scope) since the date thereof. The reserves reflected in the Margo Recent Balance Sheet are adequate, appropriate and reasonable and the reserves reflected in the Margo Recent Balance Sheet are in accordance with GAAP consistently applied. (c) Except as set forth on SCHEDULE 5.7(C), since the date of the Margo Recent Balance Sheet to the date of this Agreement, there has been no material adverse change in the business, operations or financial condition of Margo or any event, condition or contingency that could reasonably be expected to result in such a Material Adverse Effect with respect to Margo. (d) The Margo Common Stock is registered under Section 12 of the Exchange Act. Except as set forth in SCHEDULE 5.7], since March 31, 1995, Margo has filed all reports, registration statements and other documents, together with any amendments thereto, required to be filed under the Securities Act and the Exchange Act, including, without limitation, reports on Form10-K, Form 10-Q and Form 8-K, and Margo (and Purchaser following the Reincorporation Merger) will file all such reports, registration statements and other documents required to be filed by it from the date of this Agreement to the Effective Time. B-22
S-4132nd Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 132nd
5.8 ABSENCE OF CERTAIN CHANGES OR EVENTS. Since December 31, 1999 to the date of this Agreement, except as set forth in SCHEDULE 5.8, Margo has conducted its business only in the ordinary course consistent with past practice and there has not been: (i) any material adverse change in the financial condition, operations, properties, assets, liabilities or business of Margo; (ii) any material damage, destruction or loss of any material properties of Margo; (iii) any material change in the manner in which the business of Margo has been conducted; (iv) any occurrence not included in paragraphs (i) through (iii) of this Section which has resulted, or which Margo has reason to believe could reasonably be expected to result, in a Material Adverse Effect. 5.9 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS; EXECUTIVE OFFICERS; LABOR. -------------------------------------------- (a) Except as set forth on SCHEDULE 5.9(A), no employees of Margo, Purchaser or their Subsidiaries are covered by collective bargaining agreements or are members of unions. SCHEDULE 5.9(A) sets forth a true and complete list of all written executive compensation plans, bonus plans, incentive compensation plans, deferred compensation plans or agreements, employee pension plans or retirement plans, employee profit sharing plans, employee stock purchase plans, group life insurance, hospitalization insurance, severance or other employee benefit plans (as defined in Section 3(3) of ERISA) of Margo, Purchaser and their Subsidiaries (the "MARGO PLANS") providing for benefits for any employees of Margo or its Subsidiaries. Margo has no agreement or commitment to create any additional such Margo Plan. There are no unfunded obligations relating to the Margo Plans. To the extent applicable, the Margo Plans comply in all material respects with ERISA, the Code and the P.R. Internal Revenue Code. (b) Margo and Purchaser will provide notifications to all of their employees of their rights under Section 4980B of the Code within the time required for the giving of such notification under such section, and Margo and Purchaser will comply with all of the other provisions of such Section 4980B in connection with the iTract Merger, the Asset Sale and the other Contemplated Transactions. (c) Except as set forth on SCHEDULE 5.9,(c), neither the execution and delivery of this Agreement nor the consummation of any of the Contemplated Transactions under this Agreement will entitle any current or former employee of Margo or Purchaser to severance pay or other similar payment, or accelerate the time of payment or increase the amount of compensation due to any such employee or former employee. Margo and Purchaser have no threatened or pending labor disputes with their employees. 5.10 COMPLIANCE WITH LAW. ------------------- B-23
S-4133rd Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 133rd
(a) Except as set forth on SCHEDULE 5.10(A), the operations of Margo, Purchaser and their Subsidiaries have been conducted in all material respects in accordance with all applicable Laws. Except as set forth on SCHEDULE 5.10(A), neither Margo nor Purchaser has received any notification of any asserted present or past failure to comply with any such Laws. Except as set forth in Schedule 5.10(b), Margo, Purchaser and their Subsidiaries have all licenses, permits, orders, authorizations or approvals of Governmental Bodies ("MARGO LICENSES") required for the conduct of their businesses and are not in violation of any such Margo License. All such Margo Licenses are in full force and effect and no suspension or cancellation thereof has been threatened of which Margo is aware. (b) Margo, Purchaser and their Subsidiaries, as the case may be, have obtained all Margo Licenses which are required with respect to Margo, Purchaser and their Subsidiaries under all Environmental Laws. Margo, Purchaser and their Subsidiaries are in compliance in all material respects with all terms and conditions of such required Margo Licenses, and are also in compliance in all material respects with all Environmental Laws. Except as set forth in Schedule 5.10(b), there does not exist as a result of any action or inaction of Margo, Purchaser or their Subsidiaries, or, to the knowledge of Margo any of the predecessors of any of the foregoing, or, as a result of any action or inaction of any other Person, nor has Margo or Purchaser or any of the predecessors of any of the foregoing, received notice of, any events, condition or circumstances which may interfere with or prevent continued compliance, or which may give rise to any liability, or otherwise form the basis of any claim, action, suit, proceedings, hearing or investigation, based on or related to the violation of an Environmental Law or the manufacture, processing, distribution, use, treatment, storage, disposal, transport, or handling, or the emission, discharge, release or threatened release into the environment, of any Hazardous Material which would result in a Material Adverse Effect on Margo or Purchaser or any of their Subsidiaries or with respect to the Nursery Business Assets. (c) To the best of Margo's knowledge, no Hazardous Material has been incorporated in, used on, stored on or under, released from, treated on, transported to or from, or disposed of by Margo, Purchaser or their Subsidiaries or any of the predecessors of any of the foregoing, on or from any property owned or leased by Margo, Purchaser or their Subsidiaries or any of the predecessors of any of the foregoing, or by any other Person such that, under Environmental Laws (i) any such Hazardous Material would be required to be removed, cleaned up or remediated before the property owned or leased by Margo, Purchaser or their Subsidiaries could be altered, renovated, demolished or transferred, or (ii) the owner or lessee of the property (as applicable to Margo, Purchaser or their Subsidiaries) could be subjected to liability for the removal, clean up or remediation of such Hazardous Material; and neither Margo nor Purchaser, their Subsidiaries or any of the predecessors of any of the foregoing, has received notification from any Governmental Bodies or other Persons relating to Hazardous Material on or affecting any property owned or leased by Margo, Purchaser or any of their Subsidiaries or any of the predecessors of any of the foregoing, or relating to any potential or known liability under Environmental Laws arising from the ownership or leasing of any property. 5.11 PURCHASER AND PURCHASER SUBSIDIARY'S OPERATIONS. Each of Purchaser and Purchaser Subsidiary was formed solely for the purpose of engaging in the Contemplated Transactions and has B-24
S-4134th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 134th
not (i) engaged in any business activities, (ii) conducted any operations other than in connection with the Contemplated Transactions, (iii) incurred any liabilities other than in connection with the Contemplated Transactions or (iv) owned any assets or property. 5.12 LITIGATION. Except as listed in SCHEDULE 5.12, there is no action, suit, inquiry, proceeding or investigation by or before any court or Governmental Body pending or threatened against or involving Margo or Purchaser, Purchaser Subsidiary or the Nursery Business Assets or which questions or challenges the validity of this Agreement or the Contemplated Transactions, and Margo has not received any notice of any event or occurrence which could result in any such action, suit, inquiry, proceeding or investigation nor, to the knowledge of Margo, is there any valid basis for any such action, suit, inquiry, proceeding or investigation. 5.13 RECORDS. The books of account, corporate records and minute books of Margo, Purchaser and Purchaser Subsidiary are complete and correct in all material respects. Complete and accurate copies of all such books of account, corporate records and minute books of Margo, Purchaser and Purchaser Subsidiary have been provided to iTract. 5.14 NO BROKERS OR FINDERS. Except as set forth in SCHEDULE 5.14, Purchaser and Purchaser Subsidiary have not, nor have any of their officers, directors or employees, employed any broker or finder or incurred any liability for any brokerage or finder's fee or commissions or similar payment in connection with any of the Contemplated Transactions. 5.15 REGISTRATION STATEMENT. The Registration Statement and any amendments thereof or supplements thereto, at the time of the filing or mailing, at the time of the meeting of the stockholders of Margo to be held in connection with the transactions contemplated by this Agreement, and at the time it is filed or becomes effective, will not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state any material fact required to be stated therein or necessary in order to make the statements therein, in light of the circumstances under which they are made, not misleading; provided, that neither Margo nor Purchaser shall have liability under this Section 5.15 for information supplied by iTract or ICES or their respective officers, directors, stockholders or affiliates in writing for inclusion in the Registration Statement. 5.16 NASDAQ. The Margo Common Stock has been approved for listing on Nasdaq Small Cap market under the symbol "MRGO" and is in compliance in all material respects with all rules and regulations of the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. and Nasdaq applicable to Margo and the listing of such securities on Nasdaq. 5.17 TAX REPORTING. Consistent with the intent of the parties hereto, Purchaser and Purchaser Subsidiary shall treat, and cause their Affiliates to so treat, the Merger as an exchange under Section 351 with respect to all Tax Returns, to the extent consistent with Law. 5.18 DISCLOSURE. No representations or warranties by Margo, Purchaser or Purchaser Subsidiary in this Agreement and no statement contained in any schedules, exhibits or certificates furnished or to be furnished by Margo, Purchaser or Purchaser Subsidiary to iTract or ICES pursuant to the provisions hereof, contains or will contain any untrue statement of material fact or omits or B-25
S-4135th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 135th
will omit to state any material fact necessary, in light of the circumstances under which it was made, in order to make the statements herein or therein not misleading. Documents delivered or to be delivered by Margo, Purchaser or Purchaser Subsidiary to iTract or ICES pursuant to this Agreement are or will be true and complete copies of what they purport to be. 6. COVENANTS RELATING TO REINCORPORATION AND CONTEMPLATED TRANSACTIONS. ------------------------------------------------------------------- 6.1 REINCORPORATION MERGER. ---------------------- (a) From and after the date of this Agreement, Margo and Purchaser will take all commercially reasonable actions necessary to cause Margo to be merged with and into Purchaser, with Purchaser as the surviving corporation of such merger, so that as a result of such merger, Purchaser will assume all of the assets, liabilities, properties and rights of Margo. In effecting the Reincorporation Merger, Margo and Purchaser will cause each share of Margo Common Stock to be converted into one share of Purchaser Common Stock, so that immediately after the Reincorporation Merger, each Person that was previously a holder of Margo Common Stock will be the holder of the same number of shares of Purchaser Common Stock. (b) All of the options to purchase Margo Common Stock (the "Margo Options") outstanding as of the effective time of the Reincorporation Merger shall, by virtue of the Reincorporation Merger and without any further action on the part of Margo or the holders of such options, be converted into Purchaser Options in the manner provided by this Section 6.1(b). Each Purchaser Option issued in exchange for a Margo Option shall be exercisable for that whole number of shares of Purchaser Common Stock (to the nearest whole share) that a holder of the number of Margo Common Stock subject to such Margo Option immediately prior to the effective time of the Reincorporation Merger would be entitled to receive under Section 6.1(a) of this Agreement. The aggregate purchase price for the shares of Purchaser Common Stock subject to each Purchaser Option issued in exchange for a Margo Option shall be the same as the aggregate purchase price for the Margo Common Stock subject to the corresponding Margo Option immediately prior to such effective time. Purchaser agrees that as soon as practicable after the Effective Time it will cause to be filed one or more registration statements on Form S-8 under the Securities Act, in order to register the shares of Purchaser Common Stock issuable upon exercise of the converted Margo Options (if the issuance of such shares may be registered on Form S-8). 6.2 REGISTRATION OF PURCHASER SHARES. In connection with the Reincorporation Merger, Margo and Purchaser will (i) prepare and file with the SEC a proxy/registration statement on Form S-4 (the "Registration Statement"), (ii) use commercially reasonably efforts to cause the Registration Statement to become effective as soon as practicable after filing, and (iii) cause the Registration Statement to be mailed to Margo's shareholders immediately after it has become effective. The Registration Statement will (A) solicit proxies to vote in favor of (i) the Reincorporation Merger, and (ii) the approval of the Contemplated Transactions, including the transactions contemplated by this Agreement and the Asset Sale, (B) register the Purchaser Shares to be issued to the former shareholders of Margo in connection with the Reincorporation Merger, (C) register any Margo Options and any iTract Options to be outstanding after the Effective Date (if required); and (D) B-26
S-4136th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 136th
register the Purchaser Shares to be issued to the Members as the Merger Consideration. 6.3 COOPERATION OF iTRACT. iTract and ICES will furnish to Margo in writing all information reasonably requested by Margo for use in connection with the preparation of the Registration Statement and obtaining the effectiveness thereof. 6.4 ASSET SALE. ---------- (a) Purchaser and/or Margo will take all commercially reasonable efforts necessary to cause the Nursery Business Assets to be sold (the "ASSET SALE") as soon as practicable after obtaining the approval of such sale from Margo's shareholders. The Asset Sale shall be consummated on or prior to the Effective Time. (b) Margo shall provide iTract with a copy of any proposed purchase agreement for the Asset Sale prior to its execution by Margo. The terms and conditions of the purchase agreement must be reasonably acceptable to iTract, including the structure of the transaction (i.e., an asset sale or a stock sale). Notwithstanding the foregoing, iTract shall not be entitled to object to the purchase price under the proposed purchase agreement if the purchase price equals or exceeds $5,000,000 in cash. iTract shall either approve or disapprove the terms and conditions of the purchase agreement within three business days of its delivery by Margo to iTract. Margo shall not consummate the Asset Sale on terms which are different from those set forth in the purchase agreement approved by iTract without iTract's prior written consent (which may not be unreasonably withheld). 6.5 NASDAQ LISTING. Margo shall timely notify Nasdaq of the Contemplated Transactions and the shares to be issued in connection therewith. The Parties shall together take such actions as are reasonably required to obtain the approval of Nasdaq to list the Purchaser Shares on The Nasdaq SmallCap Market immediately upon the effectiveness of the iTract Merger (the "NASDAQ LISTING"). 6.6 STOCKHOLDERS APPROVAL. Margo shall use commercially reasonable efforts to obtain the approval of its stockholders (the "STOCKHOLDER APPROVAL") of the Contemplated Transactions (to the extent required by applicable law and the rules of Nasdaq) as soon as practicable following the date upon which the Registration Statement is declared effective by the SEC. Subject to the fiduciary duties of the Board of Directors of Margo under applicable law, Margo shall, through its Board of Directors, recommend to the holders of Margo Common Stock approval of this Agreement and the transactions contemplated by this Agreement. 6.7 VOTING AGREEMENT OF SPECTOR. Concurrent with the execution of this Agreement, Michael J. Spector, the principal shareholder of Margo, has entered into an agreement with iTract in the form of EXHIBIT C, pursuant to which Mr. Spector has agreed to vote all of the shares of Margo Common Stock held by him in favor of the Contemplated Transactions. 6.8 iTRACT LOCK-UP AGREEMENTS. Prior to the effective date of the Registration Statement, iTract and ICES shall cause each of the Members receiving Purchaser Shares in the Merger (and each person who may receive shares of Purchaser Common Stock upon the exercise of any iTract Options) to execute and deliver to Purchaser the iTract Lock-Up Agreement in the form of EXHIBIT B-27
S-4137th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 137th
D to this Agreement, pursuant to which each such Person shall have agreed not to sell, pledge, dispose of or otherwise transfer any of such shares until the eight months after the Effective Time. 6.9 OCCUPANCY AGREEMENT. Prior to April 18, 2000, iTract shall have entered into a written occupancy agreement with ICES relating to the lease by iTract of a portion of the premises located at 220 West 19th Street, 12th Floor, New York, New York. 7. CONDITIONS TO THE OBLIGATIONS OF MARGO, PURCHASER AND PURCHASER SUBSIDIARY. -------------------------------------------------------------------------- The obligations of Margo, Purchaser and Purchaser Subsidiary to effect the Contemplated Transactions, including the iTract Merger, shall be subject to the satisfaction at or prior to the Effective Time of each of the following conditions, any one or more of which may be waived by Margo or Purchaser, as applicable to the extent permitted by applicable law: 7.1 LEGAL OPINION. Purchaser and Purchaser Subsidiary shall have received the opinion of Kronish Lieb Weiner & Hellman LLP, counsel to iTract, dated the Effective Time and addressed to Purchaser and Purchaser Subsidiary, in form and substance reasonably acceptable to Margo. 7.2 NO INJUNCTION. There shall not be in effect or threatened any injunction, order or decree of a Governmental Body of competent jurisdiction that prohibits or delays, or seeks to prohibit or delay, consummation of any material part of the transactions contemplated hereunder. 7.3 STOCKHOLDER APPROVAL. Margo shall have obtained the Stockholder Approval. 7.4 FAIRNESS OPINION. (i) Margo shall have received an opinion of Schwartz, Heslin Group, Inc. or another independent investment banking firm addressed to Margo that the iTract Merger is fair, from a financial point of view, to the stockholders of Margo and (following the Reincorporation Merger) to the shareholders of Purchaser; and (ii) Margo shall have received an opinion of San Juan Holdings, Inc. or another investment banking firm addressed to Margo that the Asset Sale is fair, from a financial point of view, to the stockholders of Margo. 7.5 REPRESENTATIONS, WARRANTIES AND AGREEMENTS. (i) The representations and warranties of iTract set forth in this Agreement shall be true and correct in all material respects as of the date of this Agreement and as of the Effective Time with the same effect as though made as of the Effective Time, unless made as of another date, in which case they shall be true and correct in all materials respects as of such date, (ii) iTract shall have performed and complied in all material respects with the agreements contained in this Agreement required to be performed and complied with by it prior to or as of the Effective Time and (c) Purchaser shall have received certificates to the foregoing effect signed by the manager of iTract. 7.6 APPROVALS. All iTract Approvals necessary in connection with the execution, delivery and performance of this Agreement by iTract or for the consummation of the Contemplated Transactions shall have been obtained or made and shall be in full force and effect. B-28
S-4138th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 138th
7.7 REGISTRATION. The Registration Statement registering the Purchaser Shares being issued to the shareholders of Margo in the Reincorporation Merger shall be effective in accordance with the provision of the Securities Act, and no stop order suspending such effectiveness shall have been issued and remain in effect. 7.8 NASDAQ LISTING. The Purchaser Shares shall be listed on the Nasdaq SmallCap Market. 7.9 NO MATERIAL ADVERSE EFFECT. No event, occurrence, fact, condition, change, development or effect shall have occurred, exist or come to exist since the date of this Agreement that, individually or in the aggregate, has constituted or resulted in, or could reasonably be expected to constitute or result in a Material Adverse Effect for iTract. 7.10 PROCEEDINGS SATISFACTORY. All certificates, opinions and other documents to be delivered by iTract to Margo and Purchaser and all other corporate or organizational matters to be accomplished by iTract prior to or at the Closing shall be reasonably satisfactory to Margo, Purchaser and their counsel. 7.11 SECRETARY OF STATE CERTIFICATES. Purchaser shall have received certificates of the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware with respect to iTract and ICES showing iTract and ICES to be validly existing and in good standing in the State of Delaware. 7.12 MANAGER'S CERTIFICATE OF iTRACT. Purchaser shall have received a certificate of the manager of iTract certifying (i) a true and complete copy of the resolutions duly and validly adopted by the manager and a majority of the Members of iTract, evidencing the authorization of the execution and delivery of this Agreement and the consummation of the Contemplated Transactions, (ii) the names and signatures of the manager and officers of iTract authorized to sign this Agreement and the other documents to be delivered hereunder and (iii) a true and complete copy of the certificate of formation and limited liability company agreement of iTract. 7.13 SECRETARY'S CERTIFICATE. Margo and Purchaser shall have received certificates of the Secretary or Assistant Secretary of ICES certifying (i) a true and complete copy of the resolutions duly and validly adopted by the Board of Directors of ICES evidencing the authorization of the execution and delivery of this Agreement and the consummation of the Contemplated Transactions, (ii) the names and signatures of the officers of ICES authorized to sign this Agreement and the other documents to be delivered hereunder and (iii) a true and complete copy of the certificate of incorporation and bylaws of ICES. 7.14 iTRACT LOCKUP AGREEMENTS. Each of the Members receiving Purchaser Shares and each of the holders of the iTract Options shall have executed and delivered to Purchaser the iTract Lock-Up Agreements. 7.15 PUERTO RICO RULING. Margo shall have received a ruling from the Puerto Rico Department of the Treasury confirming that the Reincorporation Merger qualifies as a tax free reorganization under the Puerto Rico Internal Revenue Code of 1994, as amended. B-29
S-4139th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 139th
7.16 REPAYMENT OF LOANS FROM MICHAEL J. SPECTOR AND J. MORTON DAVIS. Purchaser shall have delivered to Michael J. Spector and J. Morton Davis (the "Lenders") reasonable evidence that the ICES Loans, including accrued interest thereon, shall be repaid immediately following the Effective Time. The "ICES Loans" consist of the loans made by the Lenders to ICES in the aggregate principal amount of $2,000,000 (as evidenced by that certain Promissory Note in the original principal amount of $ 1,715,000 payable to Michael J. Spector and that certain Promissory Note in the original principal amount of $ 285,000 payable to J. Morton Davis). 7.17 ASSIGNMENT OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY. ICES, Core Active ACG LLC and TheTechDept.com, Inc. shall have executed and delivered to iTract assignments, in form and substance reasonably satisfactory to Margo, of all rights which any of them may have in any of the Intellectual Property used by iTract, including but not limited to, all rights to the "iTract" tradename, all rights to the "iTract.com" domain registration, and all rights to the software developed by them and utilized by iTract. 7.18 MODIFICATION OF TECHSPAN AGREEMENT. iTract shall have entered into a modification of its existing agreement with TechSpan, Inc., in form and substance reasonably satisfactory to Margo, to clarify that the software program to be developed by TechSpan for iTract is a "work for hire" and iTract shall be the sole and exclusive owner of such software. 7.19 RELEASE FROM MICHAEL HAAS. iTract shall obtain a release from Michael Haas of any right to receive any compensation (including any compensation in the form of equity) from iTract or any other Person in connection with, or as a result of, the Contemplated Transactions. 7.20 INDEMNIFICATION BY ICES. ICES shall have executed and delivered to Purchaser and iTract an indemnification agreement in form and substance reasonably acceptable to Margo pursuant to which ICES shall agree to indemnify Purchaser and iTract for any liability arising from the failure of iTract to own or license the Intellectual Property set forth on Schedule 4.9 or the Intellectual Property set forth on Schedule 4.9 being subject to any Encumbrances other than Permitted Encumbrances. 8. CONDITIONS TO THE OBLIGATIONS OF iTRACT. --------------------------------------- The obligations of iTract to effect the iTract Merger shall be subject to the satisfaction at or prior to the Effective Time of each of the following conditions, any one or more of which may be waived by iTract, to the extent permitted by applicable law: 8.1 LEGAL OPINION. iTract shall have received the legal opinion of Shutts & Bowen LLP and Pietrantoni Mendez and Alvarez LLP, counsel to Purchaser, in form and substance reasonably acceptable to iTract. 8.2 NO INJUNCTION. There shall not be in effect or threatened any injunction, order or decree of a Governmental Body of competent jurisdiction that prohibits or delays, or seeks to prohibit or delay, consummation of any material part of the Contemplated Transactions. B-30
S-4140th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 140th
8.3 REPRESENTATIONS, WARRANTIES AND AGREEMENTS. (i) The representations and warranties of Margo, Purchaser and Purchaser Subsidiary set forth in this Agreement shall be true and correct in all material respects as of the date of this Agreement and as of the Effective Time with the same effect as though made as of the Effective Time, unless made as of another date, in which case they shall be true and correct in all material respects as of such date, (ii) Margo, Purchaser and Purchaser Subsidiary shall have performed and complied in all material respects with the agreements contained in this Agreement required to be performed and complied with by them prior to or at the Closing; and (iii) iTract shall have received a certificate to the foregoing effect signed by an authorized executive officer of Purchaser. 8.4 REINCORPORATION. Margo shall have merged with and into Purchaser in the manner contemplated by Section 6.1. 8.5 REGISTRATION. The Registration Statement registering the Purchaser Shares being issued to the Members as the Merger Consideration shall be effective in accordance with the provision of the Securities Act, and no stop order suspending such effectiveness shall have been issued and remain in effect. 8.6 ASSET SALE. (i) The Asset Sale shall have been consummated, (ii) Purchaser shall have no Subsidiaries other than Purchaser Subsidiary, (iii) at the Effective Time, Purchaser shall have assets consisting of cash and cash equivalents of at least $5,000,000, (iv) at the Effective Time, the aggregate liabilities of the Purchaser (after deducting the amount of any cash and cash equivalents in excess of $5,000,000) do not exceed $10,000; and (iv) iTract shall have received a certificate to the foregoing effect signed by an executive officer of Purchaser. 8.7 TAX-FREE EXCHANGE. iTract shall have received an opinion from Kronish, Lieb, Weiner and Hellman LLP that the iTract Merger qualifies as a tax-free exchange under Section 351 of the Code and an opinion from Pietrantoni Mendez & Alvarez LLP that (i) the Reincorporation Merger qualifies as a tax free reorganization under the P.R. Internal Revenue Code and (ii) the iTract Merger is not subject to taxation in Puerto Rico. 8.9 APPROVALS. All Margo Approvals, including the Stockholder Approval, necessary in connection with the execution, delivery and performance of this Agreement by Margo, Purchaser and Purchaser Subsidiary or for the consummation of the Contemplated Transactions shall have been obtained or made and shall be in full force and effect. 8.10 PROCEEDINGS SATISFACTORY. All certificates, opinions and other documents to be delivered by Margo, Purchaser or Purchaser Subsidiary to iTract and ICES and all other corporate or organizational matters to be accomplished by Margo, Purchaser or Purchaser Subsidiary prior to or at the Closing shall be reasonably satisfactory to iTract and its counsel. 8.11 CORPORATE APPROVAL. Prior to the Effective Time, the Contemplated Transactions, including this Agreement, shall have been duly approved by the Board of Directors of Margo and B-31
S-4141st Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 141st
Purchaser, and by the managers of Purchaser Subsidiary and the member of Purchaser Subsidiary, in accordance with applicable law, and the Stockholder Approval shall have been obtained. 8.12 SECRETARY OF STATE CERTIFICATES. iTract shall have received certificates of the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware with respect to Purchaser and Purchaser Subsidiary as of a recent date, showing Purchaser and Purchaser Subsidiary to be validly existing and in good standing in the State of Delaware. 8.13 RESIGNATIONS; ELECTION OF NEW DIRECTORS. --------------------------------------- (a) Each and every director, officer, manager and employee of Margo, Purchaser and Purchaser Subsidiary shall either have been terminated or tendered his or her resignation to Margo, Purchaser and Purchaser Subsidiary, respectively, effective at the Effective Time. (b) The directors and officers of the Purchaser shall have resigned and shall have appointed as their successors the Persons designated by iTract. 8.14 SECRETARY'S CERTIFICATE. iTract shall have received certificates of the Secretary or Assistant Secretary of Purchaser and of the officer or manager of Purchaser Subsidiary certifying (i) a true and complete copy of the resolutions duly and validly adopted by the Boards of Directors of Purchaser and Margo and by the managers of Purchaser Subsidiary, as applicable, evidencing the authorization of the execution and delivery of this Agreement and the consummation of the Contemplated Transactions, (ii) the names and signatures of the officers of Purchaser and Margo and Purchaser Subsidiary, as applicable, authorized to sign this Agreement and the other documents to be delivered hereunder and (iii) a true and complete copy of the certificate of incorporation and bylaws of Purchaser and of the certificate of formation and limited liability company agreement of Purchaser Subsidiary. 8.15 LOCK UP AGREEMENT. Each Person who is the holder of 5% or more of the Purchaser Common Stock immediately prior to the Effective Time shall have executed and delivered to Purchaser a Lock Up Agreement in the form of EXHIBIT E to this Agreement (the "Margo Lockup Agreement") pursuant to which each such Person agrees not to dispose of such shares until four months after the Effective Time; PROVIDED however that (i) Michael J. Spector and Margaret D. Spector shall be entitled to pledge their shares of Purchaser Common Stock to a unaffiliated lender for purposes of financing the Asset Sale, and (ii) up to 30,000 shares of Purchaser Common Stock owned by Margaret Spector shall be excluded from the lock-up; and FURTHER PROVIDED, that such a lender shall not be subject to the provisions of the Lock Up Agreement. 8.16 RELEASE OF CLAIMS. Michael J. Spector and Margaret D. Spector (collectively, the "Spectors") and Margo Nursery Farms Inc. ("Margo Farms") shall have executed and delivered a release in form and substance reasonably acceptable to iTract (the "Spector Release"), pursuant to which each of the Spectors and Margo Farms shall release Margo, Purchaser, iTract, ICES and their respective affiliates from any and all liability to them arising from the occupancy by Margo or its Subsidiaries of the nursery farm located at Vega Alta, Puerto Rico leased by the Spectors to Margo B-32
S-4142nd Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 142nd
Nursery Farms, Inc. under the Lease Agreement between Margo Nursery Farms, Inc. and the Spectors (the "Spector Lease Agreement"). 8.17 INDEMNIFICATION BY SPECTOR. Michael J. Spector and Margo Farms (if the sale of the Nursery Business Assets is made to Michael Spector or any Person affiliated with or related to Michael Spector) shall have executed and delivered an indemnification agreement in form and substance reasonably acceptable to iTract (the "Spector Indemnification Agreement"), pursuant to which Michael Spector and Margo Farms shall, jointly and severally, agree to indemnify Purchaser, iTract, ICES and their respective affiliates for any liability or claim arising from a breach of the representations and warranties set forth in Sections 5.10(b) and (c) of this Agreement; provided, that such indemnification agreement shall not incorporate the references in Section 5.10(b) and (c) relating to knowledge of Margo and materiality and shall exclude any exceptions referred to in Schedule 5.10(b). 8.18 NASDAQ LISTING. The Purchaser Shares shall be listed on the Nasdaq Small Cap Market. 8.19 PUERTO RICO RULING. Margo shall have received a ruling from the Puerto Rico Department of the Treasury confirming that the Reincorporation Merger qualifies as a tax free reorganization under the P.R. Internal Revenue Code. 8.20 OTHER RELEASES. Margo shall have received releases, in form and substance reasonably acceptable to iTract, with respect to the release of Margo by the appropriate third parties with respect to any and all liabilities or claims which may arise under the agreements listed on Schedule 8.20 hereto. 9. FURTHER AGREEMENTS OF THE PARTIES. --------------------------------- 9.1 EXPENSES. The Parties shall each bear their own respective expenses incurred in connection with this Agreement and the Contemplated Transactions, except as otherwise specifically provided herein. 9.2 ACCESS PRIOR TO THE CLOSING. --------------------------- (a) Between the date of this Agreement and the Effective Time, each Party (the "REQUESTING PARTY") may from time to time request any of the other Parties (the "REQUESTED PARTY"), upon reasonable notice to the Requested Party, (i) to give the Requesting Party and its authorized representatives full and complete access to all properties, personnel, facilities and offices of the Requested Party and to the books and records of the Requested Party (and permit the Requesting Party to make copies thereof), (ii) to permit the Requesting Party to make inspections thereof, (iii) to cause the officers and employees of, and consultants to, the Requested Party to furnish the Requesting Party with all financial information and operating data and other information with respect to the business and properties of the Requesting Party and to discuss with the Requesting Party and its authorized representatives the affairs of the Requested Party. B-33
S-4143rd Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 143rd
(b) Between the date of this Agreement and the Effective Time, each of the Parties shall use reasonable efforts to cause their respective Affiliates, officers, directors, employees, auditors, attorneys, consultants, advisors and agents, to treat as confidential and hold in strict confidence, unless compelled to disclose by judicial or administrative process or, in the opinion of its counsel, by other requirements of Law, and after prior written notice to the other Party, all confidential information of iTract or Margo or Purchaser, as the case may be, furnished to Margo or Purchaser by iTract or to iTract by Margo or Purchaser, as the case may be, or any of their respective representatives in connection with the Contemplated Transactions and will not release or disclose such confidential information to any other Person, except their respective auditors, attorneys, financial advisors and other consultants, agents and advisors in connection with the consummation of the Contemplated Transactions. If the Closing does not occur (i) such confidence shall be maintained by the Parties and each Party shall use reasonable efforts to cause its officers, directors, Affiliates and such other Persons to maintain such confidence, except to the extent such information comes into the public domain (other than as a result of an action by such Party, its officers, directors or such other persons in contravention of this Agreement), (ii) each Party shall and shall use reasonable efforts to cause its officers, directors, Affiliates and such other Persons to refrain from using any of such confidential information except in connection with this Agreement, and (iii) upon the request of any Party, the other Party shall promptly return to the requesting Party any written materials remaining in its possession, which materials it has received from the requesting Party, or their respective representatives. 9.3 PUBLICITY. Between the date of this Agreement and the Effective Time, except to the extent required by Law or the rules of the Nasdaq, none of the Parties shall, and none of them shall permit any Affiliate to, issue any press release or public announcement of any kind concerning, or otherwise publicly disclose, the Contemplated Transactions without the consent of the other; and in the event any such public announcement, release or disclosure is required by Law or the rules of the Nasdaq, the Parties will consult prior to the making thereof and use their best efforts to agree upon a mutually satisfactory text. 9.4 CONDUCT OF BUSINESS OF iTRACT. Except as expressly permitted by this Agreement, between the date of this Agreement and the Effective Time, iTract shall conduct its business only in the manner currently conducted and currently proposed to be conducted, and use all its reasonable efforts to preserve intact its present business organization and employees and to preserve the goodwill of Persons having business relations with iTract. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, except as otherwise expressly provided in this Agreement, between the date of this Agreement and the Effective Time, iTract shall pay accounts payable on a reasonable basis and pay and perform other obligations of the business of iTract when they become due and payable in the ordinary course of business, or when required to be performed, as the case may be, and shall not: (i) amend its certificate of formation in an adverse manner; (ii) organize any Subsidiary or acquire any capital stock or other equity securities of any Person or any equity or ownership interest in any business; B-34
S-4144th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 144th
(iii) incur any debt or liabilities of any kind other than in the ordinary course of business or in furtherance of the iTract Merger and the Contemplated Transactions; (iv) grant or extend any power of attorney other than in the ordinary course of business which does not affect the material part of iTract business; (v) fail to keep in full force and effect insurance comparable in amount and scope of coverage to insurance now carried by it; (vi) split, combine or reclassify its outstanding membership interests or declare, certify or pay any dividend or distribution payable in cash, stock, property or otherwise, spin off any assets or business, sell any assets or business, effect any extraordinary corporate transaction in which iTract retains all the proceeds from such sale, engage in any transaction for the purpose of effecting any recapitalization or engage in any transaction or series of related transactions which have a similar effect on any of the foregoing; (vii) sell, pledge, dispose of or agree to issue, sell or dispose of any additional interests or any options, warrants or rights of any kind, to acquire any interest in other securities, or any debt or securities convertible into or exchangeable for such membership interests or modify or amend the terms and conditions of any of the foregoing, PROVIDED, HOWEVER, that iTract may issue interests upon exercise of outstanding iTract Options, and PROVIDED FURTHER iTract may issue additional iTract Options and additional iTract Units if such options and units shall be converted into Purchaser Options or Purchaser Common Stock at the Effective Time under Article 2 of this Agreement; (viii) redeem, purchase, acquire or offer to purchase or acquire any interests other than as required by the Operating Agreement for iTract, (ix) make any acquisition of any assets or businesses other than purchases of assets in the ordinary course of business; (x) promptly advise Margo and Purchaser in writing of any Material Adverse Effect with respect to iTract; (xi) take any action which would jeopardize the treatment of the Merger as an exchange within the meaning of Section 351 of the Code; or (xii) agree or otherwise commit, whether in writing or otherwise, to do, or take any action or omit to take any action that would result in, any of the foregoing. 9.5 CONDUCT OF BUSINESS OF MARGO, PURCHASER AND PURCHASER SUBSIDIARY. Except as expressly permitted by this Agreement, between the date of this Agreement and the Effective Time, Margo (and Purchaser following the Reincorporation Merger) shall conduct its business only in the ordinary course in substantially the same manner as heretofore conducted, and, other than with respect to its efforts to effect the Reincorporation Merger and the Asset Sale, use all its reasonable B-35
S-4145th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 145th
efforts to preserve intact its present business organization and employees and to preserve the goodwill of Persons having business relations with Margo and its Subsidiaries. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, except as otherwise expressly provided in this Agreement, and except in connection with effecting the Reincorporation Merger in accordance with Section 6.1, between the date of this Agreement and the Effective Time, Margo, Purchaser and Purchaser Subsidiary shall pay accounts payable and pay and perform other obligations of their businesses when they become due and payable in the ordinary course of business consistent with past practice, or when required to be performed, as the case may be, and each of them shall not: (i) amend its articles or certificate of incorporation or bylaws (except to include such provisions in Purchaser's By-laws as is consistent with Section 9.11.); (ii) organize any Subsidiary or acquire any capital stock or other equity securities of any Person or any equity or ownership interest in any business; (iii) incur any debt or liabilities of any kind other than in the ordinary course of business or in furtherance of the iTract Merger and the Contemplated Transactions; (iv) grant or extend any power of attorney other than in the ordinary course of business which does not affect a material part of Margo's business; (v) fail to keep in full force and effect insurance comparable in amount and scope of coverage to insurance now carried by it; (vi) (i) split, combine or reclassify its outstanding capital stock or declare, set aside or pay any dividend or distribution payable in cash, stock, property or otherwise, (ii) spin-off any assets or businesses, sell any assets or businesses or effect any extraordinary corporate transaction (excluding the Asset Sale), in which Margo or Purchaser, as the case may be, retains all of the proceeds from such sale, (iii) engage in any transaction for the purpose of effecting a recapitalization, or (iv) engage in any transaction or series of related transactions which as a similar effect to any of the foregoing; (vii) sell, pledge or dispose of, or agree to issue, sell, pledge or dispose of, any additional shares of, or any options, warrants or rights of any kind to acquire any shares of its capital stock of any class, or any debt or equity securities convertible into or exchangeable for such capital stock or amend or modify the terms and conditions of any of the foregoing, PROVIDED, HOWEVER, that Margo may issue shares upon exercise of outstanding Margo Options; (viii) (i) redeem, purchase, acquire or offer to purchase or acquire any shares of its capital stock, other than as required by the governing terms of such securities, (ii) take any action (either before or after the Effective Time) which would jeopardize the treatment of the Merger as an exchange within the meaning of Section 351 of the Code, and (iii) make any acquisition of any assets or businesses (other than purchases of assets in the ordinary course of business); B-36
S-4146th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 146th
(ix) promptly advise iTract in writing of any Material Adverse Effect with respect to Margo, Purchaser or any of their Subsidiaries; or (x) agree or otherwise commit, whether in writing or otherwise, to do, or take any action or omit to take any action that would result in, any of the foregoing. After effecting the Asset Sale, neither Margo, Purchaser or Purchaser Subsidiary will engage in or conduct any business except in connection with performing its obligations under this Agreement. 9.6 CERTAIN ACTIONS BY MARGO. Notwithstanding the provisions of Section 9.5 of this Agreement, Margo and Purchaser shall have the right to take the following actions at any time prior to the consummation of the iTract Merger: (a) Margo or Purchaser, as applicable, shall have the right to make a cash dividend to their shareholders, provided that such dividend distribution does not cause Purchaser to have less than $5,000,000 in cash and cash equivalents as of the Effective Time; (b) Margo and Purchaser shall have the right to accelerate the vesting of all Margo Options which are currently outstanding; (provided that such Margo Options shall be included in the calculation of the Merger Consideration under Section 2.4); (c) Margo and Purchaser shall have the right to grant additional Margo Options in such amounts and on such terms as may be approved by the Board of Directors of Margo or Purchaser, PROVIDED that any such additional Margo Options shall be included in the calculation of the Merger Consideration under Section 2.4; (d) Margo and Purchaser shall have the right to authorize the modification of the terms of the Spector Lease Agreement. (e) Margo and Purchaser shall have the right to authorize Margo Nursery Farms, Inc., to enter into employment agreements with its key executives, so long as neither Margo nor Purchaser shall have any liability under such employment agreements on or after the Effective Time; (f) Margo and Purchaser shall have the right to authorize a payment of bonuses to the employees of Margo, Purchaser and their Subsidiaries PROVIDED that such bonuses do not cause Purchaser to have less than $5,000,000 in cash and cash equivalents at the Effective Time; and FURTHER PROVIDED that neither Margo nor Purchaser shall have any liability for such bonuses on or after the Effective Date. 9.7 FURTHER ASSURANCES. Following the Closing, the Parties shall use commercially reasonable efforts to cause each of their Affiliates, from time to time, to execute and deliver such additional instruments, documents, conveyances or assurances and take such other actions as shall be necessary, or otherwise reasonably requested by the other Party, to confirm and assure the rights and obligations provided for in this Agreement and render effective the consummation of the Contemplated Transactions. B-37
S-4147th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 147th
9.8 EXCLUSIVITY. Through the earlier of the Effective Time or the date of termination of this Agreement pursuant to Article 10 hereof, none of the Parties shall (i) solicit, initiate or encourage the submission of inquiries, proposals or offers from any Person relating to (x) any business combination with respect to iTract, Margo or Purchaser; or (y) other then with respect to the Asset Sale in the manner contemplated by this Agreement, the sale of a material portion of the assets and/or capital stock of such Party (an "ALTERNATIVE TRANSACTION"), (ii) enter into or participate in any negotiations, nor initiate any discussions or continue any discussions initiated by others, regarding any Alternative Transaction, or furnish to any other person any information with respect to the assets or business of iTract for the purposes of pursuing a possible Alternative Transaction with any other party, or (iii) otherwise participate in, assist, facilitate or encourage any effort or attempt by any other Person to do any of the foregoing. None of the Parties shall authorize their investment bankers or other advisors to violate the provisions of this paragraph and shall use reasonable efforts to prevent their investment bankers or other advisors from violating the provisions of this paragraph. 9.9 CONSENTS: REGULATORY APPROVAL. Each Party will use commercially reasonable efforts to obtain all Approvals from Persons or Governmental Bodies in order to permit the consummation of the Contemplated Transactions. 9.10 REGISTRATION RIGHTS FOR PRINCIPAL SHAREHOLDERS. At the Effective Time, Purchaser shall enter into a registration rights agreement in the form of EXHIBIT D to this Agreement, pursuant to which Purchaser shall agree to register shares of Purchaser Common Stock held by persons who were affiliates of Margo and Purchaser immediately prior to the Effective Time, and the shares of Purchaser Common Stock issued directly to Henry Kauftheil in exchange for the iTract Units held by him as of the date of this Agreement. 9.11 INDEMNIFICATION OF FORMER DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS OF MARGO, PURCHASER AND THEIR AFFILIATES. (a) From and after the Effective Time, Purchaser shall indemnify and hold harmless each present and former officer and director of Margo, Purchaser, Purchaser Subsidiary and the other Subsidiaries of Margo prior to the Effective Time (the "INDEMNIFIED PARTIES"), against all claims, losses, liabilities, damages, judgments, fines, fees, costs and expenses, including without limitation, attorney's fees and disbursements (collectively, "COSTS") incurred in connection with any claim, action, suit, proceeding or investigation, whether civil, criminal, administrative or investigative, arising out of or pertaining to matters existing or occurring at or prior to the Effective Time (including without limitation this Agreement and the Contemplated Transactions) whether asserted or claimed prior to, at or prior to the Effective Time, to the fullest extent permitted under the Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws of Margo or Purchaser, as the case may be, as in effect immediately prior to the consummation of the Reincorporation Merger, including provisions relating to advances and expenses incurred in the defense of any claim, actions, suit, proceeding or investigation. Without limiting the foregoing, in the event that any claim, action, suit or proceeding or investigation is brought against the Indemnified Party (whether arising before or after the Effective Time), the Indemnified Party may retain counsel satisfactory to such Indemnified Party and B-38
S-4148th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 148th
reasonably satisfactory to Purchaser and Purchaser shall advances the fees and expenses of such counsel for the Indemnified Party in accordance with the Certificate of Incorporation or Bylaws of the Purchaser in effect immediately prior to the consummation of the iTract Merger, provided that as a condition to the advance of expenses, the indemnified party must execute an undertaking to reimburse Purchaser if indemnified party is ultimately determined not to be entitled to indemnity. (b) In the event that the Purchaser or any of its successors or assigns (i) consolidates with, or merges into another person and shall be not the continuing or surviving corporation of such consolidation or merger or (ii) transfers or conveys all or substantially all of its property assets to any person, then, in any such case, to the extent necessary to effectuate the purposes of this Section 9.11, proper provision shall be made so that the successors and assigns of Purchaser shall succeed to the obligations set forth in this Section 9.11. 9.12 AMENDING SCHEDULES. From time to time prior to the Closing, the Parties shall promptly supplement or amend the Schedules to this Agreement with respect to any matter arising after the date of this Agreement which, if EXISTING or occurring at the date of this Agreement, would have been required to have been set forth in the Schedules to this Agreement. Such supplement or amendment shall have the effect of curing any related misrepresentation or breach of warranty made in connection with the transactions contemplated by this Agreement; PROVIDED, HOWEVER, that if such misrepresentation or breach is material, each Party shall have a commercially reasonable period of time following receipt of any supplemented or amended Schedules to elect (i) to terminate this Agreement without any further liability to the Parties or (ii) in such non-amending Party's sole discretion, to waive such breach and consummate the transactions contemplated by this Agreement. 9.13 CAPITALIZATION OF CERTAIN EXPENSES. iTract shall, prior to the Effective Time, convert all of the amounts payable by iTract to ICES and its Affiliates as of February 29, 2000 into capital contributions to iTract (or otherwise arrange to release iTract from such liabilities), PROVIDED, HOWEVER, that the amount of $525,000 (plus interest) payable by iTract to Core Active ACG LLC on demand, may remain as a liability of iTract. iTract acknowledges that the amounts to be converted to capital contributions (or released) include, without limitation, the (a) $100,000 payable to ICES, (b) $145,000 payable to TheTechDept.com, Inc. and (c) $139,000 payable to ICES. 10. TERMINATION. ----------- 10.1 TERMINATION PROCEDURES. This Agreement may be terminated before the Effective Time only as follows: (a) by written agreement of all of the Parties at any time; (b) by Margo or Purchaser, by notice to iTract, if satisfaction of any of the conditions to Purchaser's or Purchaser Subsidiary's obligations set forth in Section 7 becomes impossible, and such condition has not been waived by Margo and Purchaser or (y) has not occurred by August 15, 2000 (subject to up to a sixty (60) day extension if the Registration Statement has not been declared effective by the SEC and the Parties are using their best efforts to cause such B-39
S-4149th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 149th
effectiveness), in either case other than as a result of a material breach or default of Purchaser, Margo or Spector; (c) by iTract, by notice to Margo and Purchaser, if satisfaction of any of the conditions to iTract's obligations set forth in Section 8 becomes impossible, and such condition has not been waived by iTract or (y) has not occurred by August 15, 2000 (subject to up to a sixty (60) day extension if the Registration Statement has not been declared effective by the SEC and the Parties are using their best efforts to cause such effectiveness), in either case other than as a result of the breach or default by iTract; (d) by Purchaser or Margo, by notice to iTract, if iTract has breached this Agreement in any material respect and such breach has not been cured within 10 days after written notice from Margo or Purchaser to iTract; or (e) by iTract, by notice to Margo and Purchaser if either of them have breached this Agreement in any material respect, and such breach has not been cured within 10 days after written notice from iTract to Margo and Purchaser. 10.2 EFFECT OF TERMINATION. In the event that this Agreement is terminated pursuant to Section 10.1, this Agreement shall terminate without any liability or further obligation of any Party (other than the obligations of the Parties under Sections 9.1 and 9.2), except that: (i) in the event of the termination of this Agreement by Margo or Purchaser under Section 10.1(d), iTract and ICES shall be jointly and severally obligated to reimburse Margo and Purchaser for all out-of-pocket expenses incurred by Margo and Purchaser in connection with this Agreement and the Contemplated Transactions, up to a maximum of $100,000; and (ii) in the event of the termination of this Agreement by iTract under Section 10.1(e), Margo and Purchaser shall be jointly and severally obligated to reimburse iTract for all out-of-pocket expenses incurred by iTract incurred in connection with this Agreement and the Contemplated Transactions, up to a maximum of $100,000; and (iii) none of the parties shall be released from liability for any intentional misrepresentation or fraud. 11. MISCELLANEOUS. ------------- 11.1 SURVIVAL OF REPRESENTATIONS, WARRANTIES, COVENANTS AND AGREEMENTS. The representations, warranties, covenants and agreements of the Parties set forth in this Agreement and in any certificate delivered pursuant to this Agreement shall expire as of the Effective Time, other than the covenants and agreements contained in Article 2 and Sections 6.1, 6.8, 9.7, 9.10, 9.11 and Article 11. 11.2 ENTIRE AGREEMENT. This Agreement contains, and is intended as, a complete statement of all of the terms and the arrangements between the Parties with respect to the matters provided for, supersede any previous agreements and understandings between the Parties with respect to those matters and cannot be changed or terminated orally. No Party makes, and each Party hereby expressly disclaims reliance upon, any representations or warranties with respect to the Contemplated Transactions other than as expressly set forth in this Agreement. B-40
S-4150th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 150th
11.3 SEVERABILITY. In the event that a court of competent jurisdiction shall finally determine that any provision of this Agreement or any portion thereof is unlawful or unenforceable, such provision or portion thereof that is not invalidated by such determination shall remain in full force and effect. To the extent that a provision is deemed unenforceable by virtue of its scope but may be made enforceable by limitation thereof, such provision shall be enforceable to the fullest extent permitted under the laws and public policies of the state whose laws are deemed to govern enforceability. 11.4 GOVERNING LAW. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the law of the State of New York applicable to agreements made and to be performed therein without giving effect to conflicts of law principles. 11.5 HEADINGS. The section headings contained in this Agreement are solely for the purpose of reference, are not part of the Agreement of the Parties and shall not in any way affect the meaning or interpretation of this Agreement. All references in this Agreement to Sections, Schedules and Exhibits are to sections, schedules and exhibits to this Agreement, unless otherwise indicated. 11.6 NOTICES. All notices and other communications under this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be deemed given when (a) delivered by hand, (b) transmitted by facsimile (and confirmed by return facsimile), or (c) delivered, if sent by Express Mail, Federal Express or other express delivery service, or registered or certified mail, return receipt requested, to the addressee at the following addresses or telecopier numbers (or to such other addresses, or telecopier number as a party may specify by notice given to the other party pursuant to this provision): If to Margo, Purchaser or Purchaser Subsidiary to: Margo Caribe, Inc. Carretera 690, KM 5.8 Vega Alta, Puerto Rico 00692 ATTENTION: Michael Spector --------- Facsimile No.: (787) 883-3244 with copies to: Shutts & Bowen LLP 201 South Biscayne Boulevard Suite 1600 Miami, Florida 33131 ATTENTION: Alfred G. Smith, II, Esq. --------- Facsimile No.: (305) 381-9982 and Pietrantoni Mendez & Alvarez LLP B-41
S-4151st Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 151st
209 Avenida Munoz Rivera San Juan, Puerto Rico 00918 ATTENTION: Ignacio Alvarez, Esq. --------- Facsimile No.: (787) 274-1470 If to iTract, Surviving LLC or ICES, to: iTract, LLC 18 West 18th Street New York, New York 10011 ATTENTION: Henry Kauftheil --------- Facsimile No.: (212) 647-0535 with copies to: Mordy Gelber, Esq. 18 West 18th Street New York, New York 10011 Facsimile No.: (212) 647-8921 and Kronish Lieb Weiner & Hellman LLP 1114 Avenue of the Americas New York, New York 10036 ATTENTION: Alison Newman, Esq. --------- Facsimile No.: (212) 479-6275 11.7 BINDING EFFECT; ASSIGNMENT. This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the Parties and their respective successors and permitted assigns. Nothing in this Agreement shall create or be deemed to create any third party beneficiary rights in any Person who is not a Party, except for (i) the rights of the Indemnified Parties under Section 9.11 of this Agreement; (ii) the rights of the holders of the iTract Options and Margo Options under Sections 2.5 and 6.1(b); and (iii) the rights of the shareholders of Margo and Henry Kauftheil under Section 9.10. No assignment of this Agreement or of any rights or obligations hereunder may be made by the Parties and any such attempted assignment shall be void. 11.8 COUNTERPARTS. This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument. 11.9 AMENDMENT AND WAIVER. This Agreement may be amended, or any provision of this Agreement may be waived, provided that such amendment or waiver will be binding on a Party only if such amendment or waiver is set forth in a writing executed by such Party. The waiver of any B-42
S-4152nd Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 152nd
Party hereto of a breach of any provision of this Agreement shall not operate or be construed as a waiver of any other breach. 11.10 DISPUTE RESOLUTION. ------------------ (a) The Parties agree to attempt initially to solve all claims, disputes or controversies arising under, out of or in connection with this Agreement by conducting good faith negotiations. If the Parties are unable to settle the matter between themselves, the matter shall thereafter be resolved by alternative dispute resolution, starting with mediation and including, if necessary, a final and binding arbitration. (b) Whenever a Party shall decide to institute arbitration proceedings, it shall give written notice to that effect to the other Parties. The Party giving such notice shall refrain from instituting the arbitration proceedings for a period of sixty (60) days following such notice. During such period, the Parties shall make good faith efforts to amicably resolve the dispute without arbitration. Any arbitration hereunder shall be conducted under the rules of the American Arbitration Association. Each such arbitration shall be conducted by a panel of three arbitrators with one arbitrator being appointed by Margo (or by Purchaser if the Reincorporation Merger shall have been previously effected), one arbitrator shall be appointed by iTract and the third shall be appointed by the American Arbitration Association. (c) Any such arbitration shall be held in New York, New York. The arbitrators shall have the authority to grant specific performance. Judgment upon the award so rendered may be entered in any court having jurisdiction or application may be made to such court for judicial acceptance of any award and an order of enforcement, as the case may be. In no event shall a demand for arbitration be made after the date when institution of a legal or equitable proceeding based on such claim, dispute or other matter in question would be barred under this Agreement or by the applicable statute of limitations. [The remainder of this page is intentionally left blank.] B-43
S-4153rd Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 153rd
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Agreement as of the date and year first-above written. MARGO CARIBE, INC. By: /s/ Michael J. Spector ----------------------------- Name: Michael J. Spector Title: President and Chief Executive Officer iTRACT, LLC By: /s/ Henry Kaufthiel ----------------------------- Name: Henry Kaufthiel Title: Manager iTRACT ACQUISITION COMPANY, LLC, By: /s/ Michael J. Spector ----------------------------- Name: Michael J. Spector Title: iTRACT, INC. By: /s/ Michael J. Spector ----------------------------- Name: Michael J. Spector Title: INTERNATIONAL COMMERCE EXCHANGE SYSTEMS, INC. By: /s/ Henry Kaufthiel ----------------------------- Name: Henry Kaufthiel Title: Chairman B-44
S-4154th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 154th
LIST OF SCHEDULES MARGO/ITRACT MERGER AGREEMENT [Download Table] ITRACT SCHEDULES Schedule 4.2(a) Outstanding subscriptions, options, rights, warrants, etc. Schedule 4.2(b) Ownership of iTract Units. Schedule 4.5 iTract Approvals Schedule 4.6(a) iTract Financial Statements Schedule 4.6(c) Changes in business, operations or financial conditions of iTract Schedule 4.7(b) Exceptions to Ownership of Properties; Permitted Encumbrances Schedule 4.8 Leases Schedule 4.9 Intellectual Property Schedule 4.11 Tax Returns not timely filed by iTract Schedule 4.12 Material adverse changes, etc. Schedule 4.13 Employee benefit plans Schedule 4.14 Insurance Policies Schedule 4.15 Material Contracts Schedule 4.17(a) iTract Licenses Schedule 4.17(b) Environmental Matters Schedule 4.18 Brokers Schedule 5.1 Subsidiaries of Margo Caribe, Inc. Schedule 5.2(a) List of Outstanding Options of Margo Schedule 5.2(b) List of Outstanding Options of Purchaser Schedule 5.4 Conflicts with Other Agreements Schedule 5.5 Margo Approvals Schedule 5.6(a) List of all State, Local and Foreign Jurisdictions in which Margo and Subsidiaries have filed Tax Returns Schedule 5.6(b) Taxes Being Contested by Tax Affiliates Schedule 5.6(l) Debt Instruments Reported Under the Installment Method Schedule 5.6(n) Material Tax Elections as of the Date of Merger Schedule 5.6(v) Joint Ventures, Partnership and Other Similar Arrangements Schedule 5.7(c) Material Adverse Changes Since December 31, 1999 Schedule 5.7(d) Reports not filed under the Exchange Act since December 31, 1995 Schedule 5.8 List of Certain Material Adverse Changes or Events or other Events Outside the Ordinary Course of Business Schedule 5.9(a) Employee Benefits Plans Schedule 5.9(c) Severance Payments Schedule 5.10(a) Material Failure to Comply with Applicable Law Schedule 5.10(b) Environmental Law Violations Schedule 5.12 Pending Litigation Schedule 5.14 Brokers or Finders Schedule 8.20 Other Releases B-45
S-4155th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 155th
EXHIBITS: Exhibit A Form of Certificate of Merger merging iTract Acquisition Company, LLC into iTract, LLC Exhibit B Limited Liability Company Agreement of iTract, LLC following the merger Exhibit C Spectors Voting Agreement Exhibit D iTract Lock-Up Agreement Exhibit E Margo Lock-Up Agreement Exhibit F Registration Rights Agreement B-46
S-4156th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 156th
APPENDIX C ================================================================ STOCK PURCHASE AGREEMENT Between MARGO CARIBE, INC. ("SELLER") and EMPRESAS MARGO, INC. ("BUYER") DATED AS OF JUNE 30, 2000 ================================================================
S-4157th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 157th
Section Page ------- ---- ARTICLE I - CERTAIN DEFINITIONS................................................1 ARTICLE II - SALE OF SHARES AND MARGO MARKS....................................4 2.1 SALE OF SHARES AND MARGO MARKS...................................4 2.2 PURCHASE PRICE...................................................4 ARTICLE III - CLOSING..........................................................4 3.1 CLOSING..........................................................4 3.2 SELLER'S DELIVERIES AT THE CLOSING...............................5 3.3 BUYER'S DELIVERIES AT THE CLOSING................................5 ARTICLE IV - REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES OF SELLER..........................6 4.1 ORGANIZATION AND AUTHORITY.......................................6 4.2 SUBSIDIARIES AND DOCUMENTS.......................................7 4.3 CAPITALIZATION OF SUBSIDIARIES...................................7 4.4 OWNERSHIP OF SHARES..............................................7 4.5 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.............................................7 4.6 ABSENCE OF CHANGES...............................................7 4.7 TAX MATTERS......................................................8 4.8 NO CONFLICT WITH PROPRIETARY RIGHTS..............................8 4.9 NON-COMPETITION ARRANGEMENTS.....................................8 4.10 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS...............................................8 4.11 LITIGATION AND LABOR RELATIONS..................................9 4.12 PROPERTY AND LIABILITY INSURANCE................................9 4.13 CONSENTS AND APPROVALS..........................................9 4.14 PROPERTIES AND ASSETS..........................................10 4.15 COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS; LICENSES AND PERMITS.....................10 4.16 ENVIRONMENTAL MATTERS..........................................10 ARTICLE V - REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES BY BUYER...........................11 5.1 ORGANIZATION AND STANDING.......................................11 5.2 AUTHORITY.......................................................11 5.3 CONSENTS AND APPROVALS; NO VIOLATIONS...........................11 ARTICLE VI - CERTAIN COVENANTS AND AGREEMENTS OF SELLER AND BUYER..........................................12 6.1 ACCESS TO INFORMATION...........................................12 6.2 DISCLOSURE SUPPLEMENTS..........................................12 6.3 CONSENTS AND APPROVALS..........................................13 6.4 FILINGS.........................................................13 6.5 COVENANT TO SATISFY CONDITIONS..................................13 6.6 FURTHER ASSURANCES..............................................13 6.7 CONDUCT OF THE BUSINESS OF THE SUBSIDIARIES; INTERCOMPANY ACCOUNTS..............................14 6.8 PUBLIC DISCLOSURE...............................................14 -i-
S-4158th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 158th
ARTICLE VII - CONDITIONS PRECEDENT OF BUYER...................................14 7.1 REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES..................................14 7.2 COVENANTS.......................................................15 7.3 OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE...........................................15 7.4 NO ORDER OR PROCEEDINGS.........................................15 7.5 CONSENTS........................................................15 7.6 OPINION OF COUNSEL..............................................15 7.7 CONDUCT OF BUSINESS OF SUBSIDIARIES.............................15 7.8 CLOSING DELIVERIES..............................................16 ARTICLE VIII - CONDITIONS PRECEDENT OF SELLER.................................16 8.1 REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES..................................16 8.2 COVENANTS.......................................................16 8.3 OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE...........................................16 8.4 NO ORDER OR PROCEEDING..........................................16 8.5 CONSENTS........................................................17 8.6 OPINION OF COUNSEL..............................................17 8.7 iTract LLC MERGER...............................................17 8.8 CLOSING DELIVERIES..............................................17 8.9 STOCKHOLDER APPROVAL............................................17 ARTICLE IX - EMPLOYEE MATTERS.................................................18 9.1 RETENTION OF EMPLOYEES..........................................18 9.2 THIRD PARTY BENEFICIARIES.......................................18 ARTICLE X - SURVIVAL OF REPRESENTATIONS.......................................18 10.1 SURVIVAL OF REPRESENTATIONS....................................18 ARTICLE XI - TERMINATION AND ABANDONMENT......................................18 11.1 TERMINATION....................................................18 11.2 PROCEDURE AND EFFECT OF TERMINATION............................19 ARTICLE XII - MISCELLANEOUS...................................................19 12.1 EXPENSES OF THE PARTIES........................................19 12.2 PARTIES IN INTEREST............................................20 12.3 GOVERNING LAW..................................................20 12.4 CAPTIONS.......................................................20 12.5 ENTIRE AGREEMENT; AMENDMENTS...................................20 12.6 NOTICES........................................................20 12.7 COUNTERPARTS...................................................21 12.8 ASSIGNMENT.....................................................21 12.9 BROKERS........................................................22 12.10 ACCESS TO INFORMATION.........................................22 12.11 EXTENSION; WAIVER.............................................22 12.12 VALIDITY......................................................22 -ii-
S-4159th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 159th
LIST OF EXHIBITS AND SCHEDULES Exhibit A - List of Subsidiaries Schedule 2.2 - Lists of Debts to be Assumed by Buyer Schedule 4.3 - Authorized and outstanding capital of Subsidiaries Schedule 4.13 - Required consents and approvals Schedule 4.15 - Compliance with Laws Schedule 4.16 - Environmental Matters -iii-
S-4160th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 160th
STOCK PURCHASE AGREEMENT This Stock Purchase Agreement ("Agreement") is made and executed in San Juan, Puerto Rico as of this 30st day of June, 2000, by and between Margo Caribe, Inc., a Puerto Rico corporation ("Seller"), and Empresas Margo, Inc., a Puerto Rico corporation ("Buyer") (collectively the "Parties"). BACKGROUND WHEREAS, Seller owns all of the issued and outstanding shares of stock (the "Shares") of the corporations listed in Exhibit A hereto (the "Subsidiaries"); and WHEREAS, Seller desires to sell to Buyer, and Buyer desires to purchase from Seller, the Shares, as well as certain other proprietary rights of the Seller, on the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the respective covenants, representations and warranties contained herein, Seller and Buyer, intending to be legally bound hereby, agree as follows: ARTICLE I CERTAIN DEFINITIONS 1.1 "Affiliated Company" means a company or other entity which directly or indirectly (through one or more intermediaries) controls, is controlled by, or is under common control with either Seller, on the one hand, or Buyer, on the other hand, as the case may be. 1.2 "Closing" means the consummation of the purchase and sale of the Shares and the Margo Marks contemplated hereby which shall be effected by delivery of the documents and instruments referred to in Sections 3.2 and 3.3 hereof, each in form and content satisfactory to Buyer, Seller and their respective counsel and each dated or being effective as of the Closing Date. 1.3 "Closing Date" means the date on which the Closing occurs. 1.4 "Code" means the United States Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. 1.5 "Commonwealth" means the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico. 1.6 "Consent" means any consent, waiver, approval, authoriza tion or permit. C-1
S-4161st Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 161st
1.7 "Contracts" has the meaning set forth in Section 4.9(a). 1.8 "Damages" means all demands, claims, actions or causes of action, assessments, losses, damages, liabilities, costs and expenses, including, without limitation, defense costs, interest, penalties and attorneys' fees and expenses. 1.9 "Decree" means the decree of industrial tax exemption issued to Rain Forest Products Group, Inc. on January 1, 1997 by the Governor of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, pursuant to the provisions of the Commonwealth's Tax Incentives Act of 1987, as amended. 1.10 "Disclosure Schedules" means the schedules delivered to Buyer by Seller and attached to this Agreement listing certain information with respect to or exceptions to the representations and warranties of Seller contained in this Agreement. 1.11 "Employee Benefit Plans" means all employee benefit and welfare plans, programs, policies or arrangements maintained or contributed to by any of the Subsidiaries for the benefit of employees of the Subsidiaries, all personnel, payroll or severance policies of the Subsidiaries, all other fringe benefits provided by the Subsidiaries for the benefit of employees of the Subsidiaries and all employment, severance, termination, consulting and retirement agreements to which any Subsidiary is a party. 1.12 "Encumbrance" means any lien, charge, restriction, security interest or encumbrance of any nature. 1.13 "Environmental Law" means any federal, Commonwealth or municipal statute, law or regulation in effect on or prior to the Closing Date relating to pollution or protection of human health or the environment, including but not limited to the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act, the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, the Clean Air Act, the Clean Water Act and similar Commonwealth laws. 1.14 "ERISA" means the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended. 1.15 "Financial Statements" means the consolidated audited statements of Seller and the Subsidiaries as of December 31, 1999 and 1998 and for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 1999, and the unaudited consolidated statements of the Seller and its subsidiaries as of and for the three-month period ended March 31, 2000, copies of which have previously been delivered to the Buyer. 1.16 "GAAP" means generally accepted accounting principles in the United States. C-2
S-4162nd Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 162nd
1.17 "Governmental Entity" means any governmental or regulatory authority, department, board, bureau, agency or commission, including courts of competent jurisdiction, domestic or foreign. 1.18 "Information Memorandum" means the Confidential Information Memorandum dated April 2000 describing the business of the Seller and the Subsidiaries and heretofore delivered to Buyer. 1.19 "Interim Balance Sheet" means the consolidated unaudited balance sheet of the Seller as of March 31, 2000. 1.20 "Litigation" means any action, lawsuit, claim, proceed ing or investigation, in any court or before any federal, state, Commonwealth, municipal or other governmental department, commis sion, board, bureau, agency or instrumentality, domestic or foreign. 1.21 "Margo Marks" means each trademark, trade name, service mark and patent which has been registered or for which an applica tion for registration is pending in the name of Seller or any of the Subsidiaries, or in which the Seller or any of the Subsidiaries have otherwise acquired rights under any federal, state or Commonwealth laws, including but not limited to the right to use the name "Margo." 1.22 "Material Adverse Effect" means an effect on the business, financial condition or results of operations of the Subsidiaries, taken as a whole, which is both material and adverse. 1.23 "Order" means any order, writ, judgment, injunction, decree, statute, ordinance, rule or regulation. 1.24 "Person" means any natural person or legal entity not a party to this Agreement. 1.25 "PRIRC" means the Puerto Rico Internal Revenue Code of 1994, as amended. 1.26 "Public Disclosure" means any press release or public announcement or publicity statement or other disclosure to the public, including any announcement to employees. 1.27 "Proprietary Information" means all writings for which a claim to copyright, know-how, formulas and trade secrets have been recorded or claimed by the Subsidiaries. 1.28 "Purchase Price" means the aggregate purchase price for the Shares and the Margo Marks set forth in Section 2.2 hereof. C-3
S-4163rd Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 163rd
1.29 "Subsidiaries" or "Subsidiary" shall have the meaning assigned in the introductory paragraph of this Agreement. 1.30 "Tax" means any, and "Taxes" means collectively all, federal, state, Commonwealth, local and foreign taxes and assess ments, including all interest, penalties and additions imposed with respect to such amounts. ARTICLE II SALE OF SHARES AND MARGO MARKS 2.1 SALE OF SHARES AND MARGO MARKS Upon the terms and subject to the conditions contained in this Agreement, Seller agrees to sell, assign and transfer to Buyer and Buyer agrees to purchase from Seller at the Closing, for the consideration provided in Section 2.2 below, the Shares and the Margo Marks, free and clear of any Encumbrance. 2.2 PURCHASE PRICE Upon the terms and subject to the conditions contained in this Agreement, in consideration of the aforesaid sale, assignment and transfer of the Shares and the Margo Marks at the Closing, Buyer will pay to Seller, in cash, FIVE MILLION DOLLARS ($5,000,000) (the "Cash Purchase Price") by wire transfer of immediately available funds to an account designated in writing by Seller to Buyer at least two (2) business days prior to the Closing. The Buyer shall also agree to expressly assume those debts or liabilities of the Seller listed on Schedule 2.2 hereof. The payment of the cash amount and the assumption of such indebtedness are hereinafter collectively referred to as the "Purchase Price." ARTICLE III CLOSING 3.1 CLOSING Upon the terms and subject to the conditions contained in this Agreement, the Closing of the purchase and sale of the Shares and the Margo Marks contemplated hereby will take place at the offices of Pietrantoni Mendez & Alvarez LLP, Banco Popular Center, Suite 1901, 209 Munoz Rivera Avenue, Hato Rey, Puerto Rico at 10:00 a.m. (local time), on the first business day following the date on which all the conditions to each party's obligations C-4
S-4164th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 164th
hereunder have been satisfied or waived, or at such other time or place or both as the parties may agree. Closing shall occur by delivery of the documents and instruments described in Sections 3.2 and 3.3 hereof, each in form and content satisfactory to Buyer, Seller and their respective counsel and each dated or being effective as of the Closing Date. 3.2 SELLER'S DELIVERIES AT THE CLOSING (a) Stock certificates representing the Shares, duly endorsed in blank or accompanied by stock transfer powers; (b) A certified copy of the resolutions adopted by the Board of Directors of Seller authorizing the execution, delivery and performance by Seller of this Agreement and the transactions contemplated hereby; (c) Written resignations of all directors and officers of the Subsidiaries requested by Buyer to resign prior to the Closing Date; (d) The officer's certificate referred to in Section 7.3; (e) The opinion of counsel referred to in Section 7.6; (f) The stock books, stock ledgers, minute books and corporate seals of the Subsidiaries; (g) All records pertaining to bank accounts of the Subsidiaries; (h) An assignment by Seller to Buyer of all of its rights with respect to the Margo Marks; and (i) Such other documents, instruments and certificates as may be provided for under this Agreement or reasonably requested by Buyer prior to Closing. 3.3 BUYER'S DELIVERIES AT THE CLOSING (a) The Purchase Price; (b) An assumption agreement in form and substance satisfactory to Seller and its counsel pursuant to which Buyer agrees to assume all of Seller's debt listed on Schedule 2.2 which shall have not been cancelled prior to or concurrently with the Closing. C-5
S-4165th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 165th
(c) One or more releases executed by each of the creditors listed on Schedule 2.2 releasing the Seller and its successors and assigns from any and all liability with respect to the debt listed on Schedule 2.2. (d) A certified copy of the resolutions adopted by the Board of Directors of Buyer authorizing the execution, delivery and performance by Buyer of this Agreement and the transactions contemplated hereby; (e) The officer's certificate referred to in Section 8.3; and (f) The opinion of counsel referred to in Section 8.6; and (g) Such other documents, instruments and certificates as may be provided for under this Agreement or reasonably requested by Seller prior to Closing. ARTICLE IV REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES OF SELLER Seller represents and warrants to Buyer as follows: 4.1 ORGANIZATION AND AUTHORITY (a) Seller and each of the Subsidiaries are corporations duly organized, validly existing and in good standing under the laws of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico. The execution, delivery and performance by Seller of this Agreement have been duly authorized by all necessary corporate action on the part of Seller. This Agreement has been duly executed and delivered by Seller and, assuming due execution thereof by Buyer, constitutes a valid and binding agreement of Seller enforceable against Seller in accordance with its terms, except as may be limited by bankruptcy, insolvency, reorganization and similar laws affecting the rights of creditors generally and by the availability of equitable remedies. (b) Each of the Subsidiaries (i) has all corporate power and authority to own or lease its properties and to operate its business as presently conducted; (ii) has all governmental licenses, authorizations and permits required to own or lease its properties and to carry on its business as presently conducted, and (iii) is duly qualified to do business and is in good standing under the laws of the Commonwealth and each other jurisdiction in which the conduct of its business or the ownership or leasing of its properties requires such qualification, except in the case of clauses (ii) and (iii) where the failure to have any such license, C-6
S-4166th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 166th
authorization or permit to be so qualified or in good standing would not have a Material Adverse Effect on the business of the Subsidiaries, taken as a whole. 4.2 SUBSIDIARIES AND DOCUMENTS The Subsidiaries do not own any subsidiaries and do not own any capital stock or other interest in any other corporation or business entity nor are any of them subject to any obligations or requirements to make any investment in any entity. True and complete copies of the charter documents, the by-laws and the minutes of meetings of the Board of Directors and the sole stockholder of each of Subsidiaries have heretofore been delivered to Buyer, and said charters and by-laws are in full force and effect. 4.3 CAPITALIZATION OF SUBSIDIARIES Each of the Subsidiaries entire authorized and outstanding capital is as set forth in Schedule 4.3 hereof. All such issued and outstanding shares of the Subsidiaries common stock have been duly and validly issued and are fully paid and non-assessable, free of any preemptive rights and are owned by Seller free and clear of any and all Encumbrances. Neither Seller nor any of the Subsidiaries is a party to or bound by any options, calls, contracts or commitments of any character relating to any issued or unissued stock or any other equity security issued or to be issued by the Subsidiaries. 4.4 OWNERSHIP OF SHARES Seller has good and marketable title to the Shares, free of any and all Encumbrances and has full and unrestricted power and authority to sell, assign, transfer and deliver to Buyer valid title to the Shares. Upon delivery of the certificates representing the Shares as provided herein, Buyer will acquire good and marketable title to the Shares, free and clear of any and all Encumbrances, except those, if any, created by Buyer. 4.5 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS The Financial Statements fairly present the financial position and results of operations of Seller and the Subsidiaries on a consolidated basis as of the date and for the periods presented, all in accordance with GAAP. 4.6 ABSENCE OF CHANGES Since the date of the Interim Balance Sheet, the Subsidiaries have conducted their business in the ordinary course of business and there has not been: C-7
S-4167th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 167th
(a) any material adverse change in the financial condition, operations, properties, assets, liabilities or business of the Subsidiaries, taken as a whole. (b) any damage, destruction or loss (whether or not covered by insurance) which, either singly or in the aggregate, would have a Material Adverse Effect. 4.7 TAX MATTERS (a) Each Subsidiary has (i) timely (after giving effect to applicable extensions) filed all material returns required to be filed by it with respect to Taxes; (ii) timely paid all Taxes shown to have become due pursuant to such returns and (iii) paid all other Taxes for which a notice of assessment or demand for payment has been received. (b) All Tax returns for each Subsidiary have been prepared in accordance with all applicable laws and requirements and accurately reflect the taxable income (or other measure of Tax) of the corporation filing the return. (c) None of the Subsidiaries are a party to or bound by any Tax allocation or Tax sharing agreement or have any current or potential contractual obligation to indemnify any other Person with respect to Taxes. (d) The Decree is in full force and effect. 4.8 NO CONFLICT WITH PROPRIETARY RIGHTS (a) To the best knowledge of Seller, the conduct of the Subsidiaries' respective businesses as presently conducted does not infringe or otherwise conflict with any valid trademark, tradename, service mark, patent or copyright of others in any way which would have a Material Adverse Effect. 4.9 NON-COMPETITION ARRANGEMENTS Following the Closing, none of the Subsidiaries will be subject to any agreement which contains covenants limiting the freedom of such Subsidiary (or any successor) to compete in any line of business or with any Person. 4.10 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS There are no claims, actions or proceedings (other than routine claims for benefits) pending or, to the best knowledge of Seller, threatened, against any Subsidiary with respect to any Employee Benefit Plan. C-8
S-4168th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 168th
4.11 LITIGATION AND LABOR RELATIONS (a) There is no Litigation which, if decided adversely, would have a Material Adverse Effect. (b) There are (i) no labor disputes, material grievances, arbitration proceedings, actual or threatened strikes, work stoppages or slowdowns pending or, to the best knowledge of Seller, threatened against any Subsidiary or affecting any Subsidiary by any of their employees or their representatives; and (ii) no charges of unfair labor practices are pending or, to the best knowledge of Seller, threatened before any governmental, regulatory or administrative agency or authority. (c) None of the Subsidiaries are a party to a collective bargaining agreement. (d) Each of the Subsidiaries has complied with and is currently in compliance with all applicable federal and Commonwealth laws relating to employment, labor and working conditions, except such noncompliance which, in the aggregate, would not have a Material Adverse Effect, and Seller is not aware of the existence of any liability for any material arrearages of wages (other than current wages not yet due or payable), severance pay or other applicable laws or regulations relating to labor, or any taxes or penalties for failure to comply with any of such laws. 4.12 PROPERTY AND LIABILITY INSURANCE The property and liability insurance coverage relating to the business of the Subsidiaries is sufficient for compliance with all requirements of law and of all agreements to which any Subsidiary is a party and provides coverage in amounts which are adequate against all risks usually insured against by Persons operating similar businesses. 4.13 CONSENTS AND APPROVALS Except as set forth in Schedule 4.13, neither the execution and delivery of this Agreement by Seller nor the consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby will (a) violate any provision of the Certificate of Incorporation or By-Laws (or other comparable governing documents) of Seller or of any of the Subsidiaries, (b) require any Consent of, or filing with or notification to, any Governmental Entity, (c) require any Consent under, or result in a violation or breach of, or constitute (with or without due notice or lapse of time or both) a default (or give rise to any right of termination, cancellation or acceleration of any obligation to repay) under, any contract to which the Seller or any Subsidiary is a party or by which they or any of their property or assets may be C-9
S-4169th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 169th
bound, or (d) violate any Order of any Governmental Entity applicable to Seller or the Subsidiaries. 4.14 PROPERTIES AND ASSETS Each of the Subsidiaries has good, valid and marketable title to all of its properties and assets, including without limitation all assets reflected on the Interim Balance Sheet and all assets acquired since the date of the Interim Balance Sheet (except for assets since sold, used or otherwise disposed of in the ordinary course of business consistent with past practices) free and clear of all Encumbrances. 4.15 COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS; LICENSES AND PERMITS (a) Except as set forth in Schedule 4.15, the operations of the Subsidiaries have been conducted in accordance with applicable laws, except such noncompliance which, in the aggregate, would not have a Material Adverse Effect. 4.16 ENVIRONMENTAL MATTERS (a) Except as set forth in Schedule 4.16, each of the Subsidiaries holds, and is in substantial compliance with, all material permits, licenses and government authorizations required for the Subsidiaries to conduct their respective business under any Environmental Law, and the Subsidiaries are otherwise in compliance with all applicable Environmental Laws, except where the failure to be in compliance would not have a Material Adverse Effect; (b) None of the Subsidiaries have received any written request for information, or been notified that they are a potentially responsible party, under any Environmental Law with respect to any on-site or off-site location for which liability is currently being asserted; (c) None of the Subsidiaries have entered into or agreed to any consent decree or order, and are not subject to any judgment, decree or order relating to compliance with any Environmental Law or to investigation or cleanup of regulated substances under any Environmental Law; (d) No asbestos-containing material that could reasonably be expected to pose a current hazard to health is present at any facility or property owned or operated by any Subsidiary that could reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect; (e) None of the Subsidiaries have either expressly or by operation of law assumed or otherwise become subject to the liability of any other Person pursuant to any Environmental Law or C-10
S-4170th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 170th
any related common law theory that could reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect; (f) There are no other facts, events or circumstances with respect to the past or present operations or facilities of any of the Subsidiaries or any predecessor or affiliate thereof that would form the basis for any liability (including contingent liability) or corrective or remedial obligation pursuant to any Environmental Law or any related common law theory, including, without limitation, any liability or obligation for on-site or off-site cleanup costs, fines or penalties, property damage, personal injury or natural resources damages that could reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect. ARTICLE V REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES BY BUYER Buyer represents and warrants to Seller as follows: 5.1 ORGANIZATION AND STANDING Buyer is a corporation duly organized, validly existing and in good standing under the laws of the Commonwealth and has full corporate power and authority to enter into and perform this Agreement. 5.2 AUTHORITY The execution, delivery and performance by Buyer of this Agreement have been duly authorized by all necessary corporate action on the part of the Buyer. This Agreement has been duly executed and delivered by Buyer and, assuming due execution by Seller, constitutes a valid and binding agreement of Buyer enforceable against Buyer in accordance with its terms, except as limited by bankruptcy, insolvency, reorganization and similar laws affecting the rights of creditors generally and by the availability of equitable remedies. 5.3 CONSENTS AND APPROVALS; NO VIOLATIONS Neither the execution and delivery of this Agreement by Buyer nor the consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby by Buyer will (a) violate any provision of its Certificate of Incorporation or By-Laws, (b) require any Consent of, or filing with or notification to, any Governmental Entity, except where the failure to obtain such Consent or to make such filing or notification would not impair, hinder or adversely affect the ability of Buyer to perform any of its obligations under this Agreement or to consummate the transactions contemplated hereby (a C-11
S-4171st Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 171st
"Buyer Material Adverse Effect"), or (c) violate any Order of any Governmental Entity applicable to Buyer, except such violations which, in the aggregate, would not have a Buyer Material Adverse Effect. ARTICLE VI CERTAIN COVENANTS AND AGREEMENTS OF SELLER AND BUYER 6.1 ACCESS TO INFORMATION (a) After the date of this Agreement, Seller shall continue to permit Buyer and its representatives to have reasonable access during normal business hours, upon reasonable advance notice, to the books and records, properties and assets of the Subsidiaries, provided that such access shall be conducted by Buyer and its representatives in such a manner as not to interfere unreasonably with the business or operations of the Subsidiaries. Seller will assist Buyer in conducting such review and investigation and, subject to the aforesaid, will provide and will cause their independent public accountants to provide Buyer, its employees, agents and representatives full access to, and complete information concerning, all aspects of the businesses of the Subsidiaries, including its books, records (including tax returns filed or in preparation), personnel and premises and the audit work papers and other records of its independent public accountants. (b) In the event Seller is subject to a tax examination for years prior to the Closing Date, after the Closing Date Buyer shall permit the Seller and its representatives reasonable access during normal business hours, upon reasonable advance notice, to the books and records of the Subsidiaries for the periods under examination and will cooperate with Seller in making available to Seller and its representatives financial information reasonably requested by Seller for the tax audit, in either case, so long as it does not interfere unreasonably with the business or operations of the Subsidiaries. 6.2 DISCLOSURE SUPPLEMENTS From time to time prior to the Closing Date, Seller will supplement or amend the disclosure schedules with respect to any matter hereafter arising which, if existing or occurring at or prior to the date of this Agreement, would have been required to be set forth or described in the disclosure schedules or which is necessary to complete or correct any information in the disclosure schedule or in any representation or warranty of Seller which has been rendered inaccurate thereby; provided, however, that for the purposes of determining the satisfaction of the condition set forth C-12
S-4172nd Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 172nd
in Section 7.1 hereof, no such supplement or amendment shall be given effect. 6.3 CONSENTS AND APPROVALS Each of the parties hereto shall use its best efforts to obtain as promptly as practicable all Consents of Governmental Entities and third parties required in connection with the consummation of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement; it being understood, however, that neither party shall be required, in satisfaction of its obligations under this or any other Section of this Agreement, to agree to hold separate or sell any assets or operations or otherwise take actions which it reasonably believes may interfere, in any material respect, with the benefits intended to be realized by such party as a result of the transactions contemplated hereby. 6.4 FILINGS Promptly after the execution of this Agreement, each of the parties hereto shall prepare and make or cause to be made any required filings, submissions and notifications under the laws of any jurisdiction to the extent that such filings are necessary to consummate the transactions contemplated hereby, will use its best efforts to respond to and comply with any requests for additional information made by any Governmental Entity, and will use its best efforts to take all other actions necessary to consummate the transactions contemplated hereby in a manner consistent with applicable law. Each of the parties hereto will furnish to the other party such necessary information and reasonable assistance as such other party may reasonably request in connection with the foregoing. 6.5 COVENANT TO SATISFY CONDITIONS Seller will use its best efforts to ensure that the conditions set forth in Article VII hereof are satisfied, insofar as such matters are within the control of Seller, and Buyer will use its best efforts to ensure that the conditions set forth in Article VIII hereof are satisfied, insofar as such matters are within the control of Buyer. 6.6 FURTHER ASSURANCES Subject to the terms and conditions herein provided, each of the parties hereto agrees to use its best efforts to take, or cause to be taken, all action, and to do, or cause to be done, all things necessary, proper or advisable under applicable laws and regulations to consummate and make effective the transactions contemplated by this Agreement. If at any time after the Closing Date any further action is necessary or desirable to carry out the C-13
S-4173rd Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 173rd
purposes of this Agreement, the parties hereto shall, at Buyer's expense, take or cause to be taken all such reasonably necessary action, including, without limitation, the execution and delivery of such further instruments and documents as may be reasonably requested by either party for such purposes or otherwise to consummate and make effective the transactions contemplated hereby. 6.7 CONDUCT OF THE BUSINESS OF THE SUBSIDIARIES; INTERCOMPANY ACCOUNTS (a) Prior to the Closing, except as consented to or approved by Buyer in writing, Seller shall cause the Subsidiaries to: (i) conduct their respective businesses in the ordinary and usual course consistent with past practice; (ii) use their best efforts to maintain satisfactory relationships with customers, suppliers, distributors and others having commercially beneficial business relationships; (b) All intercompany accounts between the Subsidiaries and the Seller shall be settled at or prior to the Closing. (c) Seller shall apply the certificates of deposit with Banco Santander Puerto Rico securing the indebtedness listed on Schedule 2.2 against the amounts owed with respect to such indebtedness. 6.8 PUBLIC DISCLOSURE The parties will consult with each other and agree on desirability, timing and substance of any Public Disclosure, relating solely to the transactions contemplated hereby. Subject to applicable law, including but not limited to federal, state and Commonwealth securities laws, neither party will make any Public Disclosure without the prior agreement of the other party as to the time of the issuance, extent of distribution, and form and substance of the Public Disclosure. ARTICLE VII CONDITIONS PRECEDENT OF BUYER The obligation of Buyer to consummate the transactions contemplated hereby is subject to the fulfillment or written waiver by Buyer of each of the following conditions prior to or at the Closing: C-14
S-4174th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 174th
7.1 REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES The representations and warranties of Seller made hereunder shall be true and correct in all material respects as of the date hereof and at and as of the Closing Date, with the same force and effect as though made at and as of the Closing Date, except for changes permitted or contemplated by this Agreement. 7.2 COVENANTS Seller shall have performed and complied in all material respects with all covenants and agreements required by this Agreement to be performed or complied with by Seller. 7.3 OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE Buyer shall have received a certificate of an authorized officer of Seller, dated the Closing Date, certifying that the conditions contained in Sections 7.1 and 7.2 have been fulfilled. 7.4 NO ORDER OR PROCEEDINGS No Order shall have been enacted, entered or promulgated (and remain in effect) or have been enforced by any Governmental Entity which prohibits or restricts the consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby. No action or proceeding by any Governmental Entity shall have been commenced (and remain pending) against Buyer, Seller, the Subsidiaries or any of their respective Affiliated Companies seeking to prevent, delay or materially change the transactions contemplated hereby or challenging any of the terms or provisions of this Agreement or seeking material damages in connection therewith. 7.5 CONSENTS All Consents of Governmental Entities necessary for consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby shall have been obtained. 7.6 OPINION OF COUNSEL Buyer shall have received an opinion or opinions of Pietrantoni Mendez & Alvarez LLP, counsel to Seller, in form and substance reasonably satisfactory to Buyer. 7.7 CONDUCT OF BUSINESS OF SUBSIDIARIES Since the date of this Agreement, the respective businesses of the Subsidiaries shall have been conducted, in all material respects, in the ordinary and usual course consistent with past practice. C-15
S-4175th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 175th
7.8 CLOSING DELIVERIES Buyer shall have received each of the following: (a) all documents, instruments and other closing deliveries specified in Section 3.2; and (b) such other evidence as Buyer may reasonably request in order to establish compliance with the conditions of Closing set forth herein. ARTICLE VIII CONDITIONS PRECEDENT OF SELLER The obligation of Seller to consummate the transactions contemplated hereby is subject to the fulfillment or written waiver by Seller of each of the following conditions prior to or at the Closing: 8.1 REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES The representations and warranties of Buyer made hereunder shall be true and correct in all material respects as of the date hereof and at and as of the Closing Date, with the same force and effect as though made at and as of the Closing Date, except for changes permitted or contemplated by this Agreement. 8.2 COVENANTS Buyer shall have performed and complied in all material respects with all covenants and agreements required by this Agreement to be performed or complied with by Buyer prior to or at the Closing. 8.3 OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE Seller shall have received a certificate of an authorized officer of Buyer, dated the Closing Date, certifying that the conditions contained in Sections 8.1 and 8.2 have been fulfilled. 8.4 NO ORDER OR PROCEEDING No Order shall have been enacted, entered or promulgated (and remain in effect) or shall have been enforced by any Governmental Entity which prohibits or restricts the consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby. No action or proceeding by any Governmental Entity shall have been commenced (and remain pending) against Buyer, Seller, the Subsidiaries or any of their respective Affiliated Companies seeking to prevent, delay or materially change C-16
S-4176th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 176th
the transactions contemplated hereby or challenging any of the terms or provisions of this Agreement or seeking material damages in connection therewith. 8.5 CONSENTS All Consents of Governmental Entities necessary for consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby shall have been obtained. 8.6 OPINION OF COUNSEL Seller shall have received an opinion of Aviles & Colon Morales, LLP, counsel to Buyer, in form and substance reasonably satisfactory to Seller. 8.7 iTract LLC MERGER The S-4 Registration Statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission by iTract, Inc. shall have been declared effective and Seller shall have received evidence reasonably satisfactory to Seller and its counsel that the mergers contemplated by that certain Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of April 11, 2000, by and among Margo Caribe, Inc., iTract Acquisition Company, LLC, iTract, Inc., iTract, LLC and International Commercial Exchange Systems, Inc. will occur concurrently with or immediately following the sale of the Shares and the Margo Marks hereunder. 8.8 CLOSING DELIVERIES Seller shall have received each of the following: (a) all documents, instruments and other closing deliveries specified in Section 3.3; and (b) such other evidence as Seller may reasonably request in order to establish compliance with the conditions of Closing set forth herein. 8.9 STOCKHOLDER APPROVAL Seller shall have obtained the approval of its stockholders of this Agreement and the transactions contemplated hereby. C-17
S-4177th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 177th
ARTICLE IX EMPLOYEE MATTERS 9.1 RETENTION OF EMPLOYEES Buyer agrees to retain the employees currently employed by the Subsidiaries and to honor their years of service for purposes of determining applicable employee benefits, including vacation and severance benefits. This Agreement shall not limit the ability of Buyer to terminate employees in the ordinary course of business or it otherwise deems necessary or advisable in connection with the business of the Subsidiaries following the Closing. 9.2 THIRD PARTY BENEFICIARIES Notwithstanding any provision to the contrary contained herein, no employee or former employee of any of the Subsidiaries will be construed as a third party beneficiary under this Article IX of this Agreement or otherwise. ARTICLE X SURVIVAL OF REPRESENTATIONS 10.1 SURVIVAL OF REPRESENTATIONS All representations, warranties, covenants and agreements made by either party to this Agreement or in any certificate delivered pursuant to this Agreement shall expire on the Closing Date, and Seller shall have no liability whatsoever with respect to said representations, warranties, covenants and agreements other than the covenants and agreements contained in Article II hereof and Sections 6.6, 6.8 and 11.1. ARTICLE XI TERMINATION AND ABANDONMENT 11.1 TERMINATION This Agreement may be terminated at any time prior to the Closing Date as follows: (a) by mutual consent of Buyer and Seller; (b) by either Buyer or Seller at any time after October 15, 2000 if, through no fault of the party seeking termination, the Closing shall not have occurred; C-18
S-4178th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 178th
(c) by Buyer, if there has been a material violation or breach by Seller of any agreement, representation, covenant or warranty contained in this Agreement which has rendered the satisfaction of any condition to the obligations of Buyer impossible and such violation or breach has not been waived by Buyer; (d) by Seller, if there has been a material violation or breach by Buyer of any agreement, representation, covenant or warranty contained in this Agreement which has rendered the satisfaction of any condition to the obligations of Seller impossible and such violation or breach has not been waived by Seller; (e) by either Buyer or Seller if a court of competent jurisdiction shall have issued an Order permanently restraining or prohibiting the transactions contemplated by this Agreement, and such Order shall have become final and nonappealable; or 11.2 PROCEDURE AND EFFECT OF TERMINATION In the event of termination of this Agreement and abandonment of the transactions contemplated hereby by either of the parties pursuant to Section 11.1 hereof, written notice thereof shall forthwith be given to the other party hereto and this Agreement shall terminate and the transactions contemplated hereby shall be abandoned, without any liability or further obligation except that (i) in the event of the termination of this Agreement by Buyer under Section 11.1(c), Seller shall be obligated to reimburse Buyer for all out-of-pocket expenses incurred by Buyer in connection with this Agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby, up to a maximum of $100,000 and (ii) in the event of the termination of this Agreement by Seller under Section 11.1(d), Buyer shall be obligated to reimburse Seller for all out-of-pocket expenses incurred by Seller in connection with the Agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby, up to a maximum of $100,000. ARTICLE XII MISCELLANEOUS 12.1 EXPENSES OF THE PARTIES Buyer will pay its own expenses, and Seller will pay its own expenses and the expenses of the Subsidiaries, including the expenses of its accountants and attorneys, in connection with the negotiation, execution and consummation of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement. Seller shall be responsible for any and all stock transfer taxes or documentation, any other C-19
S-4179th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 179th
similar registration costs, taxes and fees in connection with the transfer of the Shares contemplated hereby. 12.2 PARTIES IN INTEREST This Agreement will inure to the benefit of and be binding on and enforceable against the parties hereto and their respective successors and permitted assigns. 12.3 GOVERNING LAW This Agreement will be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the Commonwealth, regardless of the laws that might otherwise govern under applicable principles of conflict of laws thereof. 12.4 CAPTIONS The captions and section numbers appearing in this Agreement are inserted only as a matter of convenience and in no way define, limit or construe the scope and intent of such sections nor in any way affect the interpretation of this Agreement. 12.5 ENTIRE AGREEMENT; AMENDMENTS This Agreement, the disclosure schedules and the documents and other agreements referred to herein, set forth the entire agreement of the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof, and supersede any prior oral or written agreement or understanding (other than any confidentiality agreement executed by the parties prior to this Agreement) between the parties. No modification or amendment of this Agreement may be made except in writing signed by both parties. 12.6 NOTICES Any notices or communications required or permitted hereunder will be deemed sufficiently given by either of the parties hereto to the other party if such notice or communication is in writing and delivered in person or by a nationally recognized overnight delivery service, sent via facsimile, or mailed (postage prepaid), by registered or certified mail, return receipt requested, as follows: C-20
S-4180th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 180th
If to Seller, to: Margo Caribe, Inc. Road 690, Kilometer 5.8 Vega Alta, Puerto Rico 00692 Fax: (787) 883-3244 Attention: Chief Executive Officer with a required copy to: Ignacio Alvarez, Esq. Pietrantoni Mendez & Alvarez LLP Banco Popular Center, Suite 1901 209 Munoz Rivera Avenue Hato Rey, Puerto Rico 00918 Fax: (809) 274-1470 If to Buyer, to: Empresas Margo, Inc. Road 690, Kilometer 5.8 Vega Alta, Puerto Rico 00692 Fax: (787) 883-3244 Attention: Michael J. Spector with a required copy to: Luis Anibal Aviles Pagan, Esq. Suite 1112, Home Mortgage Plaza 268 Ponce de Leon Avenue San Juan, PR 00918 Fax: (787) 754-2077 or to such other address or addresses as hereafter will be furnished as provided in this Section 12.6 by either of the parties hereto to the other party hereto. Each such notice will be deemed to have been given as of the date received. A return receipt, or evidence of refusal, obtained by the Post Office authorities at the request of the sender, or the expiration of ten days after mailing, will be conclusive as of the fact of receipt. 12.7 COUNTERPARTS This Agreement may be executed in counterparts, each of which will be deemed to be an original, and together will constitute one and the same instrument. C-21
S-4181st Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 181st
12.8 ASSIGNMENT This Agreement may not be assigned by either party hereto without the prior written consent of the other party, except that Buyer may assign its right to any of its Affiliated Company, but no such assignment shall relieve Buyer of its obligations hereunder. 12.9 BROKERS Buyer and Seller each represent and warrant to the other that, except for San Juan Holdings, Inc., the fees and expenses of which will be paid by Seller, all negotiations between them have been carried out by them directly, without the intervention of any third person, and that there are no broker's commissions, finder's fees or other payment payable to any Person in connection with the transactions contemplated hereby. 12.10 ACCESS TO INFORMATION For a period of eighteen (18) months following the Closing Date, Buyer will give Seller and its officers, employees and representatives reasonable access, upon reasonable advance notice, to such documentation and information which Seller or its affiliates may reasonably request for inspection and copying at Seller's expense, provided that such access and inspection and copying shall be conducted in such a manner as not to interfere unreasonably with the business and operations of the Subsidiaries and, provided further, that Seller and its officers, employees and representatives shall keep all such documentation and information confidential. 12.11 EXTENSION; WAIVER At any time prior to the Closing Date, the party entitled to the benefits of the respective term or provision may (a) extend the time for the performance of any of the obligations or other acts of the other party hereto, (b) waive any inaccuracies in the representations and warranties contained herein or in any document, certificate or writing delivered pursuant hereto or (c) waive compliance with any obligation, covenant, agreement or condition contained herein. Any agreement on the part of either party to any such extension or waiver shall be valid only if set forth in an instrument in writing signed on behalf of the party entitled to the benefits of such extended or waived term or provision. 12.12 VALIDITY The invalidity or unenforceability of any provision of this Agreement shall not affect the validity or enforceability of any other provision of this Agreement, each of which shall remain in full force and effect. C-22
S-4182nd Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 182nd
[BALANCE OF THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK] C-23
S-4183rd Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 183rd
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement as of the date first written above. MARGO CARIBE, INC. By: /s/ MICHAEL RUBIN ----------------------------- Name: Michael Rubin Title: Director EMPRESAS MARGO, INC. By: /s/ MICHAEL J. SPECTOR ----------------------------- Name: Michael J. Spector Title: President and Chief Executive Officer C-24
S-4184th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 184th
APPENDIX D [SCHWARTZ HESLIN GROUP, INC. LETTERHEAD] CONFIDENTIAL April 11, 2000 Margo Caribe, Inc. Carretera 690, Km. 5.8 Vega Alta, Puerto Rico 00692 Attention: Members of the Board Of Directors Gentlemen: You have requested that the Schwartz Heslin Group, Inc. ("SHG") deliver an Opinion to the Board of Directors of Margo Caribe, Inc. ("Margo"), a Puerto Rico corporation, that from a financial point of view, the following merger transaction with respect to itract, LLC ("itract" or the "Company") is fair to Margo's existing shareholders: Under the Agreement and Plan of Merger by and among Margo Caribe, Inc. ("Margo") and itract, LLC ("itract,") dated April 11, 2000, itract, LLC members would receive 86.8% of the issued and outstanding shares of common stock of Margo (on a fully diluted basis) in exchange for all of the membership units of itract. Margo will sell its existing operating businesses prior to the merger. In addition, Margo must have at least $5 million in cash and cash equivalents and not be subject to liabilities exceeding $10,000 as of the time of the effective closing. With respect to itract, LLC, certain existing liabilities representing International Commerce Exchange Systems, Inc. ("ICES") funded services and activities will be converted to contributed capital in the amount of approximately $384,000. SHG issued a Valuation Report, which is an integral part of this Fairness Opinion, on the Company as of March 31, 2000. The Valuation Report contains detailed descriptions of our quantitative and qualitative analyses and conclusions; the statement of valuation assumptions and limiting conditions; SHG credentials; engagement letter; and a signed indemnification agreement. In conducting our analysis and arriving at our Opinion as expressed herein, we have considered such financial and other factors, as we have deemed appropriate under the circumstances. We have reviewed, among other things, without limitation, the following: (i) the March 17, 2000 itract, LLC Business Plan (ii) certain internal information, financial and operational in nature (including
S-4185th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 185th
Margo Caribe, Inc. April 11, 2000 Page 2 projections prepared by itract and ICES management) concerning the business and operations of itract; (iii) certain available information concerning the trading of, and the trading market for, the Common Stock of Margo Caribe, Inc.; (iv) certain publicly available information with respect to other companies that we believe to be comparable in certain respects to itract (or one or more of its business segments) and the trading markets for certain of such other companies' securities as of March 31, 2000. We have also met with certain officers and employees of itract to discuss the foregoing as well as other matters we believe relevant to our inquiry. We have also taken into account our assessment of market and financial conditions, as well as our experience in connection with similar transactions and valuations generally including economic, business, and financial market changes since March 31, 2000 through the signing of the Merger Agreement on April 11, 2000. In arriving at our Opinion, we have assumed and relied upon the accuracy and completeness of all of the financial and other information provided us or publicly available and have not attempted independently to verify any of such information, nor have we made or obtained any independent evaluations or appraisals of itract's ability to achieve its Business Plan as presented. Accordingly, we express no opinion or any form of assurance for the underlying data presented in this opinion and/or the Valuation Report nor do we express any opinion or any form of assurance that itract can achieve its Business Plan as presented. This Opinion, along with the Valuation Report, are to be used only for the one purpose stated. Any use or reliance of this report for any other purpose by you or third parties is invalid. SHG is independent of itract, LLC, International Commerce Exchange Systems, Inc. and Margo Caribe, Inc. and has no financial interest in either of these businesses. Our fee for this Opinion is in no way influenced by the results of our analysis. Based upon and subject to the foregoing and based upon such other matters, as we consider relevant, it is our Opinion that as of the date hereof, the cited merger transaction is fair, from a financial standpoint, to existing shareholders. Very truly yours, Schwartz Heslin Group, Inc. /s/ Schwartz Heslin Group, Inc. D-2
S-4186th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 186th
APPENDIX E [SAN JUAN HOLDINGS, INC. LETTERHEAD] June 30, 2000 STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL Board of Directors MARGO CARIBE, INC. Road 690, Kilometer 5.8 Vega Alta, Puerto Rico 00692 Dear Members of the Board: Margo Caribe, Inc. (the "Company") and iTract, LLC ("iTract"), a developmental stage internet company, have entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as of April 11, 2000 (the "Agreement"). Under the Agreement, the Company would first reincorporate as a Delaware corporation pursuant to a merger with a newly created Delaware corporation. A subsidiary of the new Delaware corporation would then merge with iTract (the "iTract Merger"). As a condition prior to consummating the iTract Merger, the Company is required to sell its nursery and other operating businesses. You have asked us to advise you with respect to the fairness to the Company, from a financial point of view, of the consideration to be received by the Company pursuant to the terms of the Stock Purchase Agreement, dated as of June 30, 2000 (the "Stock Purchase Agreement"), between the Company and Empresas Margo, Inc., a Puerto Rico corporation ("Empresas Margo"). The Stock Purchase Agreement provides for the purchase by Empresas Margo, or an entity owned and controlled by Empresas Margo, of all of the issued and outstanding shares (the "Shares") of Margo Nursery Farms, Inc., Margo Garden Products, Inc., Margo Landscaping & Design, Inc., Rain Forest Products, Inc., and Margo Development Corp. (the "Subsidiaries"), which are wholly-owned subsidiaries of the Company (the "Transaction"). In consideration of the aforesaid Transaction, Empresas Margo shall pay to the Company a cash payment of $5.0 million plus the assumption of the outstanding debt (after application of the cash collateral securing this debt) of Margo. As of May 31, 2000, the outstanding principal amount of the debt to be assumed was approximately $812,000 (the "Consideration"). In arriving at our opinion, we have reviewed certain publicly available business and financial information relating to the Company, as well as the Stock Purchase Agreement. We have also reviewed certain other information, including financial forecasts, provided to us by the Company and have met with the Company's management to discuss the business and prospects of the Company. We have also considered certain financial and stock market data of the Company, and we have compared that data with similar data for other publicly held companies in businesses similar to the Company and we have considered the financial terms of certain other business combinations and other transactions which have recently been effected. We also considered such other information, financial studies, analyses and investigations and financial, economic and market criteria which we deemed relevant. At the request of the Board of Directors of the Company, we solicited indications of interest in acquiring the Subsidiaries from certain U.S. nursery companies and other third parties specifically identified to us by the Company.
S-4187th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 187th
FAIRNESS OPINION LETTER--MARGO CARIBE, INC. June 30, 2000 Page 2 of 2 In connection with our review, we have not assumed any responsibility for independent verification of any of the foregoing information and have relied on its being complete and accurate in all material respects. With respect to the financial forecasts, we have assumed that they have been reasonably prepared on bases reflecting the best currently available estimates and judgments of the Company's management as to the future financial performance of the Company. In addition, we have not been requested to make, and have not made, an independent evaluation or appraisal of the assets or liabilities (contingent or otherwise) of the Company nor have we been furnished with any such evaluations or appraisals. Our opinion is necessarily based upon financial, economic, market and other conditions as they exist and can be evaluated on the date hereof. With respect to the iTract Merger and Agreement, we have not been provided and have not reviewed the terms of the iTract Merger, the Agreement, or any information relating to iTract or any of the possible financial effects of the iTract Merger. We understand that, as of the date hereof, the iTract Merger is still pending based on the completion of certain terms and conditions, including the sale of the Subsidiaries. Accordingly, we have not been requested to opine as to, and our opinion does not in any manner take into consideration any possible financial, business, economic or other consequence of the iTract Merger to the Company or the shareholders of the Company. We have acted as the Company's financial advisor in connection with the sale of the Subsidiaries and will receive a fee for our services, a significant portion of which is contingent upon the consummation of the sale of the Subsidiaries. We have also received a fee for rendering this opinion. In the ordinary course of business, our affiliate holds accounts for certain customers that may, at any time, hold a position in the Company's common stock. It is understood that this letter is for the information of the Company only in connection with its consideration of the Transaction, does not constitute a recommendation to any stockholder as to how such stockholder should vote on the proposed Transaction and is not to be quoted or referred to, in whole or in part, nor shall this letter be used for any other purposes, without our prior written consent; provided, however, that this letter may be included in its entirety in any proxy statement/prospectus to be distributed to the holders of Margo common stock in connection with the Transaction and the iTract Merger. Based upon and subject to the foregoing, it is our opinion that, as of the date hereof, the Consideration to be received by the Company in the Transaction is fair to the Company, from a financial point of view. Very truly yours, /s/ SAN JUAN HOLDINGS, INC. SAN JUAN HOLDINGS, INC. E-2
S-4188th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 188th
APPENDIX F PUERTO RICO GENERAL CORPORATIONS LAW CHAPTER 10. MERGER OR CONSOLIDATION Article 10.12. Appraisal Rights. A. Any stockholder of a corporation organized in the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico (i) who holds shares of stock on the date of the making of a demand pursuant to subsection (D) of this section with respect to such shares, (ii) who continuously holds such shares through the effective date of the merger or consolidation,(iii) who has otherwise complied with subsection (D) of this section and (iv) who has neither voted in favor of the merger or consolidation nor consented thereto in writing pursuant to section 7.17 of this act shall be entitled to an appraisal by the Court of First Instance (Superior Part) of the fair value of his shares of stock under the circumstances described in subsections (B) and (C) of this section. As used in this section, the word "stockholder" means a holder of record of stock in a stock corporation, and also a member of record of a nonstock corporation. The words "stock" and "share" mean and include what is ordinarily meant by those words and also membership or membership interest of a member of a nonstock corporation. The words "depository receipt" mean a receipt or other instrument issued by a depository representing an interest in one or more shares, or fractions thereof, solely of stock of a corporation, which stock is deposited with the depository. B. Appraisal rights shall be available for the shares of any class or series of stock of a constituent corporation in a merger [or consolidation] to be effected pursuant to sections 10.01,10.02, 10.04, 10.07 or 10.08 of this act: 1. Provided, however, that no appraisal rights under this section shall be available for the shares of any class or series of stock, which stock, or depository receipts in respect thereof, at the record date fixed to determine the stockholders entitled to receive notice of and to vote at the meeting of stockholders to act upon the agreement of merger or consolidation, were either: (i) listed on a national securities exchange or the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. (NASDAQ)-NMS; or (ii) held of record by more than two thousand (2,000) holders. No appraisal rights shall be available for any shares of stock of the constituent corporation surviving a merger if the merger did not require for its approval the vote of the stockholders of the surviving corporation as provided in subsection (F) of section 10.01 of this act. 2. Notwithstanding paragraph (1) of this subsection, appraisal rights under this section shall be available for the shares of any class or series of stock of a constituent corporation if the holders thereof are required by the terms of an agreement of merger or consolidation pursuant to sections 10.01, 10.02, 10.04, 10.07 and 10.08 of this act to accept for such stock anything except: (i) shares of stock of the corporation surviving or resulting from such merger or consolidation, or depository receipts in respect thereof; (ii) shares of stock of any other corporation, or depository receipts in respect thereof, which shares of stock or depository receipts at the effective date of the merger or consolidation will be either listed on a national securities exchange or the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. (NASDAQ)-NMS or held of record by more than two thousand (2,000) holders; F-1
S-4189th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 189th
(iii) cash in lieu of fractional shares or fractional depository receipts described in the foregoing subparagraphs (i) and (ii) of this paragraph; or (iv) any combination of the I shares of stock, [depository receipts] and cash in lieu of fractional shares or fractional depository receipts described in the foregoing subparagraphs (i), (ii) and (iii) of this paragraph. 3. In the event all of the stock of a subsidiary domestic corporation party to a merger effected under section 10.03 of this act is not owned by the parent corporation immediately prior to the merger, appraisal rights shall be available for the shares of the subsidiary domestic corporation. C. Any, corporation may provide in its certificate of incorporation that appraisal rights under this section shall be available for the shares of any class or series of its stock as a result of an amendment to its certificate of incorporation, any merger or consolidation in which the corporation is a constituent corporation or the sale of all or substantially all of the assets of the corporation. If the certificate of incorporation contains such a provision, the procedures of this section; ,including those set forth in subsections (D) and (E) of this section, shall apply as nearly as is practicable. D. Appraisal rights shall be perfected as follows: 1. If a proposed merger or consolidation for which appraisal rights are provided under this section is to be submitted for approval at a meeting of stockholders, the corporation, not less than twenty (20) days prior to the meeting, shall notify each of its stockholders who was such on the record date for such meeting with respect to shares for which appraisal rights are available pursuant to subsection (B) or (C) hereof that appraisal rights are available for any or all of the shares of the constituent corporations, and shall include in such notice a copy of this section. Each stockholder electing to demand the appraisal of his shares shall deliver to the corporation, before the taking of the vote on the merger or consolidation, a written demand for appraisal of his shares. Such demand will be sufficient if it reasonably informs the corporation of the identity of the stockholder and that the stockholder intends thereby to demand the appraisal of his shares. A proxy or vote against the merger or consolidation shall not constitute such a demand. A stockholder electing to take such action must do so by a separate written demand as herein provided. Within ten (10) days after the effective date of such merger or consolidation, the surviving or resulting corporation shall notify each stockholder of each constituent corporation who has complied with this subsection and has not voted in favor of or consented to the merger or consolidation of the date that the merger or consolidation has become effective; or 2. If the merger or consolidation was approved pursuant to section 7.17 or 10.03 of this act, the surviving or resulting corporation, either before the effective date of the merger or consolidation or within ten (10) days thereafter, shall notify each of the stockholders entitled to appraisal rights of the effective date of the merger or consolidation and that Appraisal rights are available for any or all of the shares of the constituent corporation. Such notice shall include a copy of this section. The notice shall be sent by certified or registered mail, return receipt requested, addressed to the stockholder at his Address as it appears on the records of the corporation. Any stockholder entitled to appraisal rights may, within twenty (20) days after the date of mailing of the notice, demand in writing from the surviving or resulting corporation the appraisal of his shares. Such demand will be sufficient if it reasonably informs the corporation of the identity of the stockholder and that the stockholder intends thereby to demand the appraisal of his shares. E. Within one hundred and twenty (120) days after the effective date of the merger or consolidation, the surviving or resulting corporation or any stockholder who has complied with subsections (A) and (D) hereof and who is otherwise entitled to appraisal rights, may file a petition in the Court of First Instance (Superior Part) demanding a determination of the value of the stock of all such stockholders. Notwithstanding the foregoing, at any time within sixty (60) days after the effective date of the merger or consolidation, any stockholder shall have the right to withdraw his demand for appraisal and to accept the terms offered upon the merger or consolidation. Within one hundred twenty (120) days after the effective date of the merger or consolidation, any stockholder who has complied with the requirements of subsections (A) and (D) hereof, upon written request, shall be entitled to receive from the corporation surviving the merger or resulting from the consolidation a statement setting forth the aggregate number of shares not voted in favor F-2
S-4190th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 190th
of the merger or consolidation and with respect to which demands for Appraisal have been received and the aggregate number of holders of such shares. Such written statement shall be mailed to the stockholder within ten (10) days after his written request for such a statement is received by the surviving or resulting corporation or within ten (10) days after expiration of the period for delivery of demands for appraisal under subsection (D), hereof, whichever is later. F. Upon the filing of any such petition by A stockholder, service of a copy thereof shall be made upon the surviving or resulting corporation, which shall within twenty (20) days after such service file in the office of the Department of State in which the petition was filed a duly verified list containing the names and addresses of all stockholders who have demanded payment for their shares and with whom agreements as to the value of their shares have not been reached by the surviving, or resulting corporation. If the petition shall be filed by the surviving or resulting corporation; the petition shall be accompanied by such a duly verified list. The Department of State, if so ordered by the Court, shall give notice of the Puerto Rico Taxes time and place fixed for the hearing of such petition by registered or certified mail to the surviving or resulting corporation and to the stockholders shown on the list at the addresses therein stated. Such notice shall also be given by one or more publications at least one week before the day of the hearing, in a newspaper of general circulation published in San Juan, Puerto Rico or such publication as the Court deems advisable. The form of the notice by mail and by publication shall be approved by the Court. and the costs thereof shall be borne by the surviving or resulting corporation. G. At the hearing on such petition. the Court of First Instance (Superior Part),shall determine the stockholders who have complied with this section and who have become entitled to appraisal rights. The Court may require the stockholders who have demanded an appraisal for their shares and who hold stock represented by certificates to submit their certificates of stock to the Department of State for notation thereon of the pendency of the appraisal proceedings. If any stockholder fails to comply with such direction, the Court may dismiss the proceedings as to such stockholder. H. After determining the stockholders entitled to an appraisal, the Court of First Instance (Superior-Part) shall determine their fair value taking into consideration the fair rate of interest, if any, to be paid upon the amount determined to be the fair value. In determining such fair value, the Court shall take into account all relevant factors. In determining the fair rate of interest, the Court may consider all relevant factors, including the rate of interest which the surviving or resulting corporation would have had to pay to borrow money during the pendency of the proceeding. In determining the fair value of the shares, the Court shall not take into consideration any element of value arising from the accomplishment or expectation of the merger or consolidation. Upon application by the surviving or resulting corporation or by any stockholder entitled to participate in the appraisal proceeding, the Court may, in its discretion, permit discovery or other pretrial proceedings and may proceed to trial upon the appraisal prior to the final determination of the stockholder entitled to an appraisal. Any stockholder whose name appears on the list filed by the surviving or resulting corporation pursuant to subsection (F) of this section and who has submitted his certificates of stock to the Department of State, if such is required, may participate fully in all proceedings until it is finally determined that he is not entitled to appraisal, rights under this section. I. The Court shall direct the payment of the fair value of the shares, together with interest, if any, by the surviving or resulting corporation to the stockholders entitled thereto. Payment shall be so made to each such stockholder, in the case of holders of uncertificated stock forthwith, and the case of holders of shares represented by certificates upon the surrender to the corporation of the certificates representing such stock. The Court's decree may be enforced as other decrees in the Court of First Instance (Superior Part) may be enforced, whether such surviving or resulting corporation be a domestic or foreign corporation. J. The costs of the proceeding may be determined by the Court and taxed upon the parties as the Court deems equitable in the circumstances. Upon application of a stockholder, the Court may order all or a portion of the expenses incurred by, any stockholder in, connection with the appraisal proceeding, including, without limitation, reasonable attorney's fees and the fees and expenses of experts, to be charged pro rata against the value of all the shares entitled to an appraisal. F-3
S-4191st Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 191st
K. From and after the effective date of the merger or consolidation, no stockholder who has demanded his appraisal rights as provided in subsection (D) of this section shall be entitled to vote such stock for any purpose or to receive payment of dividends or other distributions on the stock (except dividends or other distributions payable to stockholders of record at a date which is prior to the effective date of the merger or consolidation). If no petition for an appraisal shall be filed within the time provided in subsection (E) of this section, or if such stockholder shall deliver to the surviving or resulting corporation a written withdrawal of his demand for an appraisal and an acceptance of the merger or consolidation, either within sixty (60) days after the effective date of the merger or consolidation as provided in subsection (E) of this section or thereafter with the written approval of the corporation, then the right of such stockholder to an appraisal shall cease. Notwithstanding the foregoing, no appraisal proceeding in the Court of First Instance (Superior Part) shall be dismissed as to any stockholder without the approval of the Court, and such approval may be conditioned upon such terms as the Court deems just. L. The shares of the surviving or resulting corporation to which the shares of such objecting stockholders would have been converted had they assented to the merger or consolidation shall have the status of authorized, and unissued shares of the surviving or resulting corporation. F-4
S-4192nd Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 192nd
APPENDIX G Certificate of Incorporation of iTract, Inc. The undersigned, a natural person, for the purpose of organizing a corporation under the laws of the State of Delaware, hereby certifies as follows: Article I - Name The name of the Corporation is iTract, Inc. (the "Corporation"). Article II - Address of Registered Office; Name of Registered Agent The address of the Corporation's registered office in the State of Delaware is 1209 Orange Street, in the City of Wilmington, County of New Castle, State of Delaware 19801. The name of its registered agent at that address is The Corporation Trust Company. Article III - Purpose The purpose of the Corporation is to engage in any lawful act or activity for which a corporation may now or hereafter be organized under the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware, as set forth in Title 8 of the Delaware Code, as in effect from time to time (the "DGCL"). Article IV - Capital Stock A. Authorization. The total number of shares of all classes of capital stock which the Corporation shall have authority to issue is 105,000,000 shares, consisting of (i) 100,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $.001 per share (the "Common Stock"), and (ii) 5,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value $.001 per share (the "Preferred Stock"). B. Preferred Stock. The Preferred Stock may be issued from time to time in one or more classes or series, each of which shall have such designations, number of shares or title, as shall be fixed by the Board of Directors of the Corporation prior to the issuance of any shares of any such class or series. Each such class or series of Preferred Stock shall consist of such number of shares, and have such voting powers, full or limited, or no voting powers, and such preferences and relative, participating, optional or other special rights and such qualifications, limitations or restrictions thereof, as shall be stated in such resolution or resolutions providing for the issue of such class or series of Preferred Stock as may be adopted from time to time by the Board of Directors prior to the issuance of any shares thereof pursuant to the authority hereby expressly vested in it, all in accordance with the laws of the State of Delaware.
S-4193rd Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 193rd
C. Common Stock. Except as otherwise provided in any Preferred Stock authorized under Section B above, or as otherwise required by law, the entire voting power for the election of directors and for all other purposes shall be vested exclusively in the holders of the Common Stock. Each share of Common Stock shall be entitled to one vote on all matters submitted to a vote of the shareholders except on such matters exclusively related to the holders of Preferred Stock. Each share of Common Stock shall be entitled to participate equally in dividends declared and paid by the Corporation from legally available funds. In the case of voluntary or involuntary liquidation, distribution or sale of assets, dissolution, or winding up of the Corporation, holders of the Common Stock are entitled to receive a pro rata portion of the amount distributed after the payment of any liquidation preference of the Preferred Stock. Article V - Limitation of Liability; Indemnification A. No director shall be personally liable to the Corporation or any of its stockholders for monetary damages for breach of fiduciary duty as a director, except for liability (i) for any breach of the director's duty of loyalty to the Corporation or its stockholders, (ii) for acts or omissions not in good faith or which involve intentional misconduct or a knowing violation of law, (iii) pursuant to Section 174 of the DGCL, or (iv) for any transaction from which the director derived an improper personal benefit. Any repeal or modification of this Article V by the stockholders of the Corporation shall not adversely affect any right or protection of a director of the Corporation existing at the time of such repeal or modification with respect to any act or omission occurring prior to such repeal or modification. B. Indemnification. The Corporation shall indemnify to the full extent authorized or permitted by law (as now or hereinafter in effect) any person made, or threatened to be made, a defendant or witness to any action, suit or proceeding (whether civil or criminal or otherwise) by reason of the fact that he, his testator or intestate, is or was a director or officer of the Corporation or by reason of the fact that such director or officer, at the request of the Corporation, is or was serving any other corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust, employee benefit plan or other enterprise, in any capacity. Nothing contained herein shall affect any rights to indemnification to which employees other than directors and officers may be entitled by law. No amendment or repeal of this subsection B of this Article V shall apply to or have any effect on any right to indemnification provided hereunder with respect to any acts or omissions occurring prior to such amendment or repeal. Article VI - Incorporator The name and mailing address of the sole incorporator is Alfred G. Smith, II, and his address is 1600 Miami Center, 201 S. Biscayne Boulevard, Miami, Florida 33131. G-2
S-4194th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 194th
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate of Incorporation as of this 4th day of April, 2000. /S/ ALFRED G. SMITH ------------------------------------- Alfred G. Smith, II, Incorporator G-3
S-4195th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 195th
APPENDIX H BYLAWS OF ITRACT, INC. (hereinafter called the "Corporation") ARTICLE I OFFICES Section 1. Registered Office. The registered office of the Corporation shall be in the City of Wilmington, County of New Castle, State of Delaware. Section 2. Other Offices. The Corporation may also have offices at such other places both within and without the State of Delaware as the Board of Directors may from time to time determine. ARTICLE II MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS Section 1. Place of Meetings. Meetings of the stockholders for the election of directors or for any other purpose shall be held at such time and place, either within or without the State of Delaware as shall be designated from time to time by the Board of Directors. In the absence of any such designation, stockholders' meetings shall be held at the principal executive office of the Corporation. Section 2. Annual Meetings. The Annual Meetings of Stockholders shall be held each year on such date and at such time as shall be designated from time to time by the Board of Directors and stated in the notice of the meeting. At such
S-4196th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 196th
H-2 meetings the stockholders shall elect by a plurality vote a Board of Directors, and transact such other business as may properly be brought before the meeting. Section 3. Special Meetings. Unless otherwise prescribed by law or by the Certificate of Incorporation, Special Meetings of Stockholders, for any purpose or purposes, may be called by either (i) the Chairman, if there be one, or (ii) the President, (iii) any Executive Vice-President, if there be one (iv) any Vice President, if there be one, (v) the Secretary, or (vi) any Assistant Secretary, if there be one, and shall be called by any such officer at the request in writing of a majority of the Board of Directors or at the request in writing of stockholders owning a majority of the capital stock of the Corporation issued and outstanding and entitled to vote. Section 4. Notice of Meetings. Whenever stockholders are required or permitted to take any action at a meeting, a written notice of the meeting shall be given which notice shall state the place, date and hour of the meeting, and, in the case of a Special Meeting, the purpose or purposes for which the meeting is called. The written notice of any meeting shall be given to each stockholder entitled to vote at such meeting not less than ten nor more than sixty days before the date of the meeting. If mailed, notice is given when deposited in the United States mail, postage prepaid, directed to the stockholder at this address as it appears on the records of the Corporation.
S-4197th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 197th
H-3 Business transacted at any meeting of stockholders shall be limited to the purposes stated in the notice. Section 5. Quorum. Except as otherwise provided by law or by the Certificate of Incorporation, a majority of the voting power of the stock issued and outstanding and entitled to vote at any meeting of stockholders, the holders of which are present in person or represented by proxy, shall constitute a quorum at all meetings of the stockholders for the transaction of business. A quorum, once established, shall not be broken by the withdrawal of enough votes to leave less than a quorum and the votes present may continue to transact business until adjournment. If, however, such quorum shall not be present or represented at any meeting of the stockholders, the stockholders entitled to vote thereat, present in person or represented by proxy, shall have power to adjourn the meeting from time to time, without notice other than announcement at the meeting, until a quorum shall be present or represented. At such adjourned meeting at which a quorum shall be present or represented, any business may be transacted which might have been transacted at the meeting as originally noticed. If the adjournment is for more than thirty days, or if after the adjournment a new record date is fixed for the adjourned meeting, a notice of the adjourned meeting shall be given to each stockholder entitled to vote at the meeting. Section 6. Voting. When a quorum is present at any meeting, unless otherwise required by law, the Certificate of
S-4198th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 198th
H-4 Incorporation or these Bylaws, any question brought before any meeting of stockholders shall be decided by the vote of the holders of a majority of the total voting power of the stock represented and entitled to vote thereat. Section 7. Proxies. At each meeting of the stockholder, each stockholder having the right to vote may vote in person or may authorize another person or persons to act for him by proxy appointed by an instrument in writing subscribed by such stockholder. No proxy shall be voted on or after three years from its date, unless such proxy provides for a longer period. All proxies must be filed with the Secretary of the Corporation at the beginning of each meeting in order to be counted in any vote at the meeting. The Board of Directors, in its discretion, or the officer of the Corporation presiding at a meeting of stockholders, in his discretion, may require that any votes cast at such meeting shall be cast by written ballot. Section 8. Consent of Stockholders in Lieu of Meeting. Unless otherwise provided in the Certificate of Incorporation, any action required or permitted to be taken at any Annual or Special Meeting of Stockholders of the Corporation, may be taken without a meeting, without prior notice and without a vote, if a consent in writing, setting forth the action so taken, shall be signed by the holders of outstanding stock having not less than the minimum number of votes that would be necessary to authorize or take such action at a meeting at which all shares entitled to vote thereon were present and voted. Prompt notice of the taking
S-4199th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 199th
H-5 of the corporate action without a meeting by less than unanimous written consent shall be given to those stockholders who have not consented in writing. Section 9. List of Stockholders Entitled to Vote. The officer of the Corporation who has charge of the stock ledger of the Corporation shall prepare and make, at least ten days before every meeting of stockholders, a complete list of the stockholders entitled to vote at the meeting, arranged in alphabetical order, and showing the address of each stockholder and the number and class of shares registered in the name of each stockholder. Such list shall be open to the examination of any stockholder, for any purpose germane to the meeting, during ordinary business hours, for a period of at least ten days prior to the meeting, either at a place within the city where the meeting is to be held, which place shall be specified in the notice of the meeting, or, if not so specified, at the place where the meeting is to be held. The list shall also be produced and kept at the time and place of the meeting during the whole time thereof, and may be inspected by any stockholder of the Corporation who is present. Section 10. Stock Ledger. The stock ledger of the Corporation shall be the only evidence as to who are the stockholders entitled to examine the stock ledger, the list required by Section 9 of this Article II or the books of the Corporation, or to vote in person or by proxy at any meeting of stockholders.
S-4200th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 200th
H-6 Section 11. Business Properly Brought Before An Annual Meeting. At any annual meeting of the stockholders, only such business shall be conducted as shall have been properly brought before the meeting. To be properly brought before an annual meeting, business must be specified in the notice of meeting (or any supplement thereto) given by or at the direction of the board, or otherwise properly brought before the meeting by a stockholder. In addition to any other applicable requirements, for business to be properly brought before an annual meeting by a stockholder, the stockholder must have given timely notice thereof in writing to the Secretary of the Corporation. To be timely, a stockholder's notice must be delivered to or mailed and received at the principal executive offices of the Corporation, not less than 50 days nor more than 60 days prior to the annual meeting; provided, however, that in the event that less than 50 days' notice or prior public disclosure of the date of the meeting is given or made to stockholders, notice by the stockholder to be timely must be so received not later than the close of business on the 10th day following the day on which such notice of the date of the annual meeting was mailed or such public disclosure was made. A stockholder's notice to the Secretary shall set forth as to each matter the stockholder proposes to bring before the annual meeting: (i) a brief description of the business desired to be brought before the annual meeting and the reasons for conducting such business at the annual meeting, (ii) the name and record address of the
S-4201st Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 201st
H-7 stockholder of record proposing such business, (iii) the class and number of shares of the Corporation which are beneficially owned by the stockholder, and (iv) any material interest of the stockholder in such business. Notwithstanding anything in the Bylaws to the contrary, no business shall be conducted at any annual meeting except in accordance with the procedures set forth in this Section 11 of this Article II provided, however, that nothing in this Section 11 of this Article II shall be deemed to preclude discussion by any stockholder of any business properly brought before the annual meeting in accordance with said procedure. The chairman of an annual meeting shall, if the facts warrant, determine and declare to the meeting that business was not properly brought before the meeting in accordance with the provisions of this Section 11 of this Article II, and if he should so determine, he shall so declare to the meeting and any such business not properly brought before the meeting shall not be transacted. In addition to the provisions of this Section 11, a stockholder shall also comply with the applicable requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder with respect to the matters set forth herein. Nothing in these Bylaws shall be deemed to affect the rights of any stockholder to request inclusion of proposals in the Corporation's proxy statement pursuant to Rule 14a-8 under the Exchange Act.
S-4202nd Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 202nd
H-8 ARTICLE III DIRECTORS Section 1. Nominations of Directors. Only persons who are nominated in accordance with the following procedures shall be eligible for election as Directors. Nominations of persons for election to the Board of the Corporation may be made at a meeting of stockholders by or at the direction of the Board of Directors, by any nominating committee or person appointed by the Board of Directors or by any stockholder of the corporation entitled to vote for the election of Directors at the meeting who complies with the notice procedures set forth in this Section 1 of this Article III. Such nominations, other than those made by or at the direction of the Board of Directors, shall be made pursuant to timely notice in writing to the Secretary of the Corporation. To be timely, a stockholder's notice shall be delivered to or mailed and received at the principal executive offices of the Corporation not less than 50 days nor more than 60 days prior to the meeting; provided, however, that in the event that less than 50 days' notice or prior public disclosure of the date of the meeting is given or made to stockholders, notice by the stockholder to be timely must be so received not later than the close of business on the 10th day following the day on which such notice of the date of the annual meeting was mailed or such public disclosure was made. Such stockholder's notice to the Secretary shall set forth: (a) as to each person whom the stockholder proposes to nominate for election or re-election as a
S-4203rd Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 203rd
H-9 Director, (i) the name, age, business address and residence address of the person, (ii) the principal occupation or employment of the person, (iii) the class and number of shares of capital stock of the Corporation which are beneficially owned by the person, (iv) any other information relating to the person that is required to be disclosed in solicitations of proxies for election of Directors pursuant to Regulation 14A under the Exchange Act, and (v) any other information relating to the person that is required pursuant to any statute, or any rule or regulation of any governmental authority; and (b) as to the stockholder giving the notice (i) the name and record address of the stockholder, and (ii) the class and number of shares of capital stock of the Corporation which are beneficially owned by the stockholder. The Corporation may require any proposed nominee to furnish such other information as may reasonably be required by the Corporation to determine the eligibility of such proposed nominee to serve as a Director of the Corporation. No person shall be eligible for election as a Director of the Corporation unless nominated in accordance with the procedures set forth herein. The chairman of the meeting shall, if the facts warrant, determine and declare to the meeting that a nomination was not made in accordance with the foregoing procedures, and if he should so determine, he shall so declare to the meeting and the defective nomination shall be disregarded. Section 2. Number and Election of Directors. The Board of Directors shall initially be fixed by the Incorporator
S-4204th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 204th
H-10 and thereafter from time to time by the Board of Directors. Except as provided in Section 3 of this Article, directors shall be elected by a plurality of the votes cast at Annual Meetings of Stockholders. Each directors shall serve until the next annual meeting of stockholders and until its successor is elected and qualified. Any director may be removed from office, with or without cause and only by the affirmative vote of the holders of at least 75% of the voting power of all the shares of the Corporation entitled to vote generally in the election of directors, voting together as a single class. Any director may resign at any time upon notice to the Corporation. Directors need not be stockholders. Section 3. Vacancies. Vacancies and newly created directorships resulting from any increase in the authorized number of directors may be filled by the affirmative vote of a majority of the remaining directors then in office, even though less than a quorum, or by a sole remaining director, and the directors so chosen shall hold office for the remainder of the full term of the class of directors in which the new directorship was created or the vacancy occurred and until such director's successors shall have been duly elected and qualified, or until their earlier resignation or removal. No decrease in the number of directors constituting the board of directors shall shorten the term of any incumbent director. Section 4. Duties and Powers. The property and business of the Corporation shall be managed by or under the
S-4205th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 205th
H-11 direction of the Board of Directors. In addition to the powers and authorities by these Bylaws expressly conferred upon them, the Board may exercise all such powers of the Corporation and do all such lawful acts and things as are not by statute or by the Certificate of Incorporation or by these Bylaws directed or required to be exercised or done by the stockholders. Section 5. Meetings. The Board of Directors of the Corporation may hold meetings, both regular and special, either within or without the State of Delaware. Regular meetings of the Board of Directors may be held without notice at such time and at such place as may from time to time be determined by the Board of Directors. Special meetings of the Board of Directors may be called by the Chairman, if there be one, the President, or any one (1) director. Notice thereof stating the place, date and hour of the meetings shall be given to each director either by mail not less than forty-eight (48) hours before the date of the meeting, by telephone, facsimile, email or telegram on twenty-four (24) hours notice, or on such shorter notice as the person or persons calling such meeting may deem necessary or appropriate in the circumstances. Section 6. Quorum. Except as may be otherwise specifically provided by law, the Certificate of Incorporation or these Bylaws, at all meetings of the Board of Directors, a majority of the entire Board of Directors shall constitute a quorum for the transaction of business and the act of a majority of the directors present at any meeting at which there is a
S-4206th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 206th
H-12 quorum shall be the act of the Board of Directors. If a quorum shall not be present at any meeting of the Board of Directors, the directors present thereat may adjourn the meeting from time to time, without notice other than announcement at the meeting, until a quorum shall be present. If only one director is authorized, such sole director shall constitute a quorum. Section 7. Actions of Board. Unless otherwise provided by the Certificate of Incorporation or these Bylaws, any action required or permitted to be taken at any meeting of the Board of Directors or of any committee thereof may be taken without a meeting, if all the members of the Board of Directors or committee, as the case may be, consent thereto in writing, and the writing or writings are filed with the minutes of proceedings of the Board of Directors or committee. Section 8. Meetings by Means of Conference Telephone. Unless otherwise provided by the Certificate of Incorporation or these Bylaws, members of the Board of Directors of the Corporation, or any committee designated by the Board of Directors, may participate in a meeting of the Board of Directors or such committee by means of a conference telephone or similar communications equipment by means of which all persons participating in the meeting can hear each other, and such participation in a meeting pursuant to this Section 8 shall constitute presence in person at such meeting. Section 9. Committees. The Board of Directors may, by resolution passed by a majority of the entire Board of Directors,
S-4207th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 207th
H-13 designate one or more committees, each such committee to consist of one or more of the directors of the Corporation. The Board of Directors may designate one or more directors as alternate members of any committee, who may replace any absent or disqualified member at any meeting of any such committee. In the absence or disqualification of a member of a committee, and in the absence of a designation by the Board of Directors of an alternate member to replace the absent or disqualified member, the member or members thereof present at any meeting and not disqualified from voting, whether or not he or they constitute a quorum, may unanimously appoint another member of the Board of Directors to act at the meeting in the place of any absent or disqualified member. Any committee, to the extent allowed by law and provided in the resolution establishing such committee, shall have and may exercise all the powers and authority of the Board of Directors in the management of the business and affairs of the Corporation, and may authorize the seal of the Corporation to be affixed to all papers which may require it; but no such committee shall have the power or authority in reference to amending the Certificate of Incorporation, adopting an agreement of merger or consolidation, recommending to the stockholders the sale, lease or exchange of all or substantially all of the Corporation's property and assets, recommending to the stockholders a dissolution of the Corporation or a revocation of a dissolution, or amending the Bylaws of the Corporation; and, unless the resolution or the Certificate of Incorporation expressly so
S-4208th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 208th
H-14 provides, no such committee shall have the power or authority to declare a dividend or to authorize the issuance of stock. Each committee shall keep regular minutes of its meetings and report the same to the Board of Directors when required. Section 10. Chairman of the Board of Directors. The Board of Directors in its discretion may choose a Chairman of the Board of Directors (who must be a director). The Chairman of the Board of Directors, if there be one, shall preside at all meetings of the stockholders and of the Board of Directors. The Chairman of the Board of Directors shall also perform such other duties and may exercise such other powers as from time to time may be assigned to him by these Bylaws or by the Board of Directors. Section 11. Compensation. Unless otherwise restricted by the Certificate of Incorporation or these Bylaws, the Board of Directors shall have the authority to fix the compensation of directors. The directors may be paid their expenses, if any, of attendance at each meeting of the Board of Directors and may be paid a fixed sum for attendance at each meeting of the Board of Directors or a stated salary as director. No such payment shall preclude any director from serving the Corporation in any other capacity and receiving compensation therefor. Members of special or standing committees may be allowed like reimbursement of expenses for attending committee meetings. Section 12. Interested Directors. No contract or transaction between the Corporation and one or more of its
S-4209th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 209th
H-15 directors or officers, or between the Corporation and any other corporation, partnership, association, or other organization in which one or more of its directors or officers are directors or officers, or have a financial interest, shall be void or voidable solely for this reason, or solely because the director or officer is present at or participates in the meeting of the Board of Directors or committee thereof which authorizes the contract or transaction, or solely because his or their votes are counted for such purpose if (i) the material facts as to his or their relationship or interest and as to the contract or transaction are disclosed or are known to the Board of Directors or their committee, and the Board of Directors or committee in good faith authorizes the contract or transaction by the affirmative votes of a majority of the disinterested directors, even though the disinterested directors be less than a quorum; or (ii) the material facts as to his or their relationship or interest and as to the contract or transaction are disclosed or are known to the shareholders entitled to vote thereon, and the contract or transaction is specifically approved in good faith by vote of the shareholders; or (iii) the contract or transaction is fair as to the Corporation as of the time it is authorized, approved or ratified, by the Board of Directors, a committee thereof or the shareholders. Common or interested directors may be counted in determining the presence of a quorum at a meeting of the Board of Directors or of a committee which authorizes the contract or transaction.
S-4210th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 210th
H-16 Section 13. Indemnification. (a) The Corporation shall indemnify any person who was or is a party or is threatened to be made a party to any threatened, pending or completed action, suit or proceeding, whether civil, criminal, administrative or investigative (other than an action by or in the right of the Corporation) by reason of the fact that he is or was a director, officer, employee or agent of the Corporation, or is or was serving at the request of the Corporation as a director, officer, employee or agent of another corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust or other enterprise, against expenses (including attorneys' fees), judgments, fines and amounts paid in settlement actually and reasonably incurred by him in connection with such action, suit or proceeding if he acted in good faith and in a manner he reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to the best interest of the Corporation, and, with respect to any criminal action or proceeding, had no reasonable cause to believe his conduct was unlawful. The termination of any action, suit or proceeding by judgment, order, settlement, conviction, or upon a plea of nolo contendere or its equivalent, shall not, of itself, create a presumption that the person did not act in good faith and in a manner which he reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to the best interests of the Corporation, and, with respect to any criminal action or proceeding, had reasonable cause to believe that his conduct was unlawful.
S-4211th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 211th
H-17 (b) The Corporation shall indemnify any person who was or is a party or is threatened to be made a party to any threatened, pending or completed action or suit by or in the right of the Corporation to procure a judgment in its favor by reason of the fact that he is or was a director, officer, employee or agent of the Corporation, or is or was serving at the request of the Corporation as a director, officer, employee or agent of another corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust or other enterprise against expenses (including attorneys' fees) actually and reasonably incurred by him in connection with the defense or settlement of such action or suit if he acted in good faith and in a manner he reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to the best interest of the Corporation and except that no such indemnification shall be made in respect of any claim, issue or matter as to which such person shall have been adjudged to be liable to the Corporation unless and only to the extent that the Court of Chancery of Delaware or the court in which such action or suit was brought shall determine upon application that, despite the adjudication of liability but in view of all the circumstances of the case, such person is fairly and reasonably entitled to indemnity for such expenses which such Court of Chancery or such other court shall deem proper. (c) To the extent that a present or former director or officer of the Corporation shall be successful on the merits or otherwise in defense of any action, suit or proceeding referred to in paragraphs (a) and (b), or in defense of any claim, issue
S-4212th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 212th
H-18 or matter therein, such person shall be indemnified against expenses (including attorneys' fees) actually and reasonably incurred by such person in connection herewith. (d) Any indemnification under paragraphs (a) and (b) (unless ordered by a court) shall be made by the Corporation only as authorized in the specific case upon a determination that indemnification of the present or former director, officer, employee or agent is proper in the circumstances because he has met the applicable standard of conduct set forth in paragraphs (a) and (b). Such determination shall be made, with respect to person who is a director or officer at the time of such determination, (1) by the Board of Directors by a majority vote of a quorum consisting of directors who were not parties to such action, suit or proceeding, or (2) by a committee of such directors designated by a majority vote of such directors, even though less than a quorum, or (3) if there are no such directors or if such directors so direct, by independent legal counsel in a written opinion, or (4) by the stockholders. (e) Expenses incurred by an officer or director in defending a civil or criminal action, suit or proceeding may be paid by the Corporation in advance of the final disposition of such action, suit or proceeding upon receipt of an undertaking by or on behalf of such director or officer to repay such amount if it shall ultimately be determined that such person is not entitled to be indemnified by the Corporation as authorized in this Section 13. Such expenses incurred by former directors and
S-4213th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 213th
H-19 officer or other employees and agents may be so paid upon such terms and conditions, if any, as the Corporation deems appropriate. (f) The indemnification and advancement of expenses provided by, or granted pursuant to, the other paragraphs of this Section 13 shall not be deemed exclusive of any other rights to which those seeking indemnification or advancement of expenses may be entitled under any bylaw, agreement, vote of stockholders or disinterested directors or otherwise, both as to action in such person's official capacity and as to action in another capacity while holding such office. (g) The Board of Directors may authorize, by a vote of a majority of a quorum of the Board of Directors, the Corporation to purchase and maintain insurance on behalf of any person who is or was a director, officer, employee or agent of the Corporation, or is or was serving at the request of the Corporation as a director, officer, employee or agent of another corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust or other enterprise against any liability asserted against such person and incurred by such person in any such capacity, or arising out of such person's status as such, whether or not the Corporation would have the power to indemnify such person against such liability under the provisions of this Section 13. (h) For the purposes of this Section 13, references to "the Corporation" shall include, in addition to the resulting corporation, any constituent corporation (including any
S-4214th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 214th
H-20 constituent of a constituent) absorbed in a consolidation or merger which, if its separate existence had continued, would have had power and authority to indemnify its directors, officers, and employees or agents, so that any person who is or was a director, officer, employee or agent of such constituent corporation, or is or was serving at the request of such constituent corporation as a director, officer, employee or agent of another corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust or other enterprise, shall stand in the same position under the provisions of this Section with respect to the resulting or surviving corporation as such person would have with respect to such constituent corporation if its separate existence had continued. (i) For purposes of this Section, references to "other enterprises" shall include employee benefit plans, references to "fines" shall include any excise taxes assessed on a person with respect to any employee benefit plan; and references to "serving at the request of the Corporation" shall include service as a director, officer, employee or agent of the Corporation which imposes duties on, or involves services by, such director, officer, employee or agent with respect to an employee benefit plan, its participants or beneficiaries; and a person who acted in good faith and in a manner such person reasonably believed to be in the interest of the participants and beneficiaries of an employee benefit plan shall be deemed to have acted in a manner "not opposed to the best interests of the Corporation" as referred to in this Section.
S-4215th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 215th
H-21 (j) The indemnification and advancement of expenses provided by, or granted pursuant to, this Section 13 shall, unless otherwise provided when authorized or ratified, continue as to a person who has ceased to be a director, officer, employee or agent and shall inure to the benefit of the heirs, executors and administrators of such a person. ARTICLE IV OFFICERS Section 1. General. The officers of the Corporation shall be chosen by the Board of Directors and shall be a President, a Secretary and a Treasurer. The Board of Directors, in its discretion, may also choose a Chief Operating Officer, one or more Vice-Presidents, one or more Assistant Secretaries and Assistant Treasurers, and such other officers as may be appointed in accordance with the provisions of Section 2 hereof. Any number of offices may be held by the same person, unless otherwise prohibited by law, the Certificate of Incorporation or these Bylaws. The officers of the Corporation need not be stockholders of the Corporation nor need such officers be directors of the Corporation. Section 2. Election. The Board of Directors, at its first meeting held after each Annual Meeting of stockholders shall elect the officers of the Corporation who shall hold their offices for such terms and shall exercise such powers and perform such duties as shall be determined from time to time by the Board of Directors; and all officers of the Corporation shall hold
S-4216th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 216th
H-22 office until their successors are chosen and qualified, or until their earlier resignation or removal. Any officer elected by the Board of Directors may be removed at any time by the affirmative vote of a majority of the Board of Directors. Any vacancy occurring in any office of the Corporation shall be filled by the Board of Directors. The salaries of all officers of the Corporation shall be fixed by the Board of Directors. Section 3. Voting Securities Owned by the Corporation. Powers of attorney, proxies, waivers of notice of meeting, consents and other instruments relating to securities owned by the Corporation may be executed in the name of and on behalf of the Corporation by the President or any Vice President and any such officer may, in the name of and on behalf of the Corporation, take all such action as any such officer may deem advisable to vote in person or by proxy at any meeting of security holders of any corporation in which the Corporation may own securities and at any such meeting shall possess and may exercise any and all rights and power incident to the ownership of such securities and which, as the owner thereof, the Corporation might have exercised and possessed if present. The Board of Directors may, by resolution, from time to time confer like powers upon any other person or persons. Section 4. President and Chief Executive Officer. The President shall, subject to the supervisory powers as may be given by the Board of Directors and, if there be one, the Chairman of the Board of Directors, be the Chief Executive
S-4217th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 217th
H-23 Officer of the Corporation and shall, subject to the control of the Board of Directors, have general supervision, direction and control of the business and officers of the Corporation and shall see that all orders and resolutions of the Board of Directors are carried into effect. He or she shall execute all bonds, mortgages, contracts and other instruments of the Corporation requiring a seal, under the seal of the Corporation, except where required or permitted by law to be otherwise signed and executed and except that the other officers of the Corporation may sign and execute documents when so authorized by these Bylaws, the Board of Directors or the President. In the absence or disability of the Chairman of the Board of Directors, or if there be none, the President shall preside at all meetings of the stockholders and the Board of Directors. The President shall also perform such other duties and may exercise such other powers as from time to time may be assigned to him or her by these Bylaws or by the Board of Directors. Section 5. Chief Operating Officer. The Chief Operating Officer shall have the day to day responsibility for the business operations of the Corporation, reporting to the President and subject to the control of the Board of Directors. Section 6. Vice-Presidents and Executive Vice-Presidents. At the request of the President or in his absence or in the event of his inability or refusal to act, the Executive Vice-President or Executive Vice-Presidents or the Vice-President or the Vice-Presidents if there is more than one (in the order
S-4218th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 218th
H-24 designated by the Board of Directors) shall perform the duties of the President, and when so acting, shall have all the powers of and be subject to all the restrictions upon the President. Each Executive Vice-President or Vice-President shall perform such other duties and have such other powers as the Board of Directors from time to time may prescribe. If there be no Executive Vice-President or Vice-President, the Board of Directors shall designate the officer of the Corporation who, in the absence of the President or in the event of the inability or refusal of the President to act, shall perform the duties of the President, and when so acting, shall have all the powers of and be subject to all the restrictions upon the President. Section 7. Secretary. The Secretary shall attend all meetings of the Board of Directors and all meetings of stockholders and record all the proceedings thereat in a book or books to be kept for that purpose; the Secretary shall also perform like duties for the standing committees when required. The Secretary shall give, or cause to be given, notice of all meetings of the stockholders and special meetings of the Board of Directors, and shall perform such other duties as may be prescribed by the Board of Directors or President, under whose supervision he shall be. If the Secretary shall be unable or shall refuse to cause to be given notice of all meetings of the stockholders and special meetings of the Board of Directors, and if there be no Assistant Secretary, then either the Board of Directors or the President may choose another officer to cause
S-4219th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 219th
H-25 such notice to be given. The Secretary shall have custody of the seal of the Corporation and the Secretary or any Assistant Secretary, if there be one, shall have authority to affix the same to any instrument requiring it and when so affixed, it may be attested by the signature of the Secretary or by the signature of any such Assistant Secretary. The Board of Directors may give general authority to any other officer to affix the seal of the Corporation and to attest the affixing by his signature. The Secretary shall see that all books, reports, statements, certificates and other documents and records required by law to be kept or filed are properly kept or filed, as the case may be. Section 8. Treasurer. The Treasurer shall have the custody of the corporate funds and securities and shall keep full and accurate accounts of receipts and disbursements in books belonging to the Corporation and shall deposit all moneys and other valuable effects in the name and to the credit of the Corporation in such depositories as may be designated by the Board of Directors. The Treasurer shall disburse the funds of the Corporation as may be ordered by the Board of Directors, taking proper vouchers for such disbursements, and shall render to the President and the Board of Directors, at its regular meetings, or when the Board of Directors so requires, an account of all his transactions as Treasurer and of the financial condition of the Corporation. If required by the Board of Directors, the Treasurer shall give the Corporation a bond in such sum and with such surety or sureties as shall be
S-4220th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 220th
H-26 satisfactory to the Board of Directors for the faithful performance of the duties of his office and for the restoration to the Corporation, in case of his death, resignation, retirement or removal from office, of all books, papers, vouchers, money and other property of whatever kind in his possession or under his control belonging to the Corporation. Section 9. Assistant Secretaries. Except as may be otherwise provided in these Bylaws, Assistant Secretaries, if there be any, shall perform such duties and have such powers as from time to time may be assigned to them by the Board of Directors, the President, any Vice-President, if there be one, or the Secretary, and in the absence of the Secretary or in the event of his disability or refusal to act, shall perform the duties of the Secretary, and when so acting, shall have all the powers of and be subject to all the restrictions upon the Secretary. Section 10. Assistant Treasurers. Assistant Treasurers, if there be any, shall perform such duties and have such powers as from time to time may be assigned to them by the Board of Directors, the President, any Vice-President, if there be one, or the Treasurer, and in the absence of the Treasurer or in the event of his disability or refusal to act, shall perform the duties of the Treasurer, and when so acting, shall have all the powers of and be subject to all the restrictions upon the Treasurer. If required by the Board of Directors, an Assistant Treasurer shall give the Corporation a bond in such sum and with
S-4221st Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 221st
H-27 such surety or sureties as shall be satisfactory to the Board of Directors for the faithful performance of the duties of his office and for the restoration to the Corporation, in case of his death, resignation, retirement or removal from office, of all books, papers, vouchers, money and other property of whatever kind in his possession or under his control belonging to the Corporation. Section 11. Other Officers. Such other officers as the Board of Directors may choose shall perform such duties and have such powers as from time to time may be assigned to them by the Board of Directors. The Board of Directors may delegate to any other officer of the Corporation the power to choose such other officers and to prescribe their respective duties and powers. ARTICLE V STOCK Section 1. Form of Certificates. Every holder of stock in the Corporation shall be entitled to have a certificate signed, in the name of the Corporation (i) by the President or a Vice-President and (ii) by the Treasurer or an Assistant Treasurer, or the Secretary or an Assistant Secretary of the Corporation, certifying the number of shares owned by him in the Corporation. Section 2. Signatures. Where a certificate is countersigned by (i) a transfer agent other than the Corporation or its employee, or (ii) a registrar other than the Corporation
S-4222nd Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 222nd
H-28 or its employee, any other signature on the certificate may be a facsimile. In case any officer, transfer agent or registrar who has signed or whose facsimile signature has been placed upon a certificate shall have ceased to be such officer, transfer agent or registrar before such certificate issued, it may be issued by the Corporation with the same effect as if he were such officer, transfer agent or registrar at the date of issue. Section 3. Lost Certificates. The Board of Directors may direct a new certificate to be issued in place of any certificate theretofore issued by the Corporation alleged to have been lost, stolen or destroyed, upon the making of an affidavit of that fact by the person claiming the certificate of stock to be lost, stolen or destroyed. When authorizing such issue of a new certificate, the Board of Directors may, in its discretion and as a condition precedent to the issuance thereof, require the owner of such lost, stolen or destroyed certificate, or his legal representative, to advertise the same in such manner as the Board of Directors shall require and/or to give the Corporation a bond in such sum as it may direct as indemnity against any claim that may be made against the Corporation with respect to the certificate alleged to have been lost, stolen or destroyed. Section 4. Transfers. Stock of the Corporation shall be transferable in the manner prescribed by law and in these Bylaws. Transfers of stock shall be made on the books of the Corporation only by the person named in the certificate or by his attorney lawfully constituted in writing and upon the surrender
S-4223rd Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 223rd
H-29 of the certificate therefor, which shall be canceled before a new certificate shall be issued. Section 5. Record Date. In order that the Corporation may determine the stockholders entitled to notice of or to vote at any meeting of stockholders or any adjournment thereof, or entitled to express consent to corporate action in writing without a meeting, or entitled to receive payment of any dividend or other distribution or allotment of any rights, or entitled to exercise any rights in respect of any change, conversion or exchange of stock, or for the purpose of any other lawful action, the Board of Directors may fix, in advance, a record date, which shall not be more than sixty days nor less than ten days before the date of such meeting, nor more than sixty days prior to any other action. A determination of stockholders of record entitled to notice of or to vote at a meeting of stockholders shall apply to any adjournment of the meeting; provided, however, that the Board of Directors may fix a new record date for the adjourned meeting. Section 6. Beneficial Owners. The Corporation shall be entitled to recognize the exclusive right of a person registered on its books as the owner of shares to receive dividends, and to vote as such owner, and to hold liable for calls and assessments a person registered on its books as the owner of shares, and shall not be bound to recognize any equitable or other claim to or interest in such share or shares of the part of any other person, whether or not it shall have
S-4224th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 224th
H-30 express or other notice thereof, except as otherwise provided by law. ARTICLE VI NOTICES Section 1. Notices. Whenever written notice is required by law, the Certificate of Incorporation or these Bylaws, to be given to any director, member of a committee or stockholder, such notice may be given by mail, addressed to such director, member of a committee or stockholder, at his address as it appears on the records of the Corporation, with postage thereon prepaid, and such notice shall be deemed to be given at the time when the same shall be deposited in the United States mail. Written notice may also be given personally or by telegram, telex, facsimile, email or cable and shall be deemed to be given at the time of receipt thereof if given personally or at the time of transmission if sent by telegram, telex, facsimile, email or cable. Section 2. Waivers of Notice. Whenever any notice is required by law, the Certificate of Incorporation or these Bylaws, to be given to any director, member of a committee or stockholder, a waiver thereof in writing, signed, by the person or persons entitled to said notice, whether before or after the time stated therein, shall be deemed equivalent thereto.
S-4225th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 225th
H-31 ARTICLE VII GENERAL PROVISIONS Section 1. Dividends. Dividends upon the capital stock of the Corporation, subject to the provisions of the Certificate of Incorporation, if any, may be declared by the Board of Directors at any regular or special meeting, and may be paid in cash, in property, or in shares of the capital stock. Before payment of any dividend, there may be set aside out of any funds of the Corporation available for dividends such sum or sums as the Board of Directors from time to time, in its absolute discretion, deems proper as a reserve or reserves to meet contingencies, or for equalizing dividends, or for repairing or maintaining any property of the Corporation, or for any proper purpose, and the Board of Directors may modify or abolish any such reserve. Section 2. Disbursements. All checks or demands for money and notes of the Corporation shall be signed by such officer or officers or such other person or persons as the Board of Directors may from time to time designate. Section 3. Fiscal Year. The fiscal year of the Corporation shall be fixed by resolution of the Board of Directors. Section 4. Corporate Seal. The corporate seal shall have inscribed thereon the name of the Corporation, the year of its organization and the words "Corporate Seal, Delaware." The
S-4226th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 226th
H-32 seal may be used by causing it or a facsimile thereof to be impressed or affixed or reproduced or otherwise. ARTICLE VIII AMENDMENTS Section 1. These Bylaws may be altered, amended or repealed, in whole or in part, or new Bylaws may be adopted by the stockholders or by the Board of Directors, provided, however, that notice of such alteration, amendment, repeal or adoption of new Bylaws be contained in the notice of such meeting of stockholders or Board of Directors, as the case may be. All such amendments must be approved by either the holders of a majority of the outstanding capital stock entitled to vote thereon or by a majority of the entire Board of Directors then in office. Section 2. Entire Board of Directors. As used in this Article VIII and in these Bylaws generally, the term "entire Board of Directors" means the total number of directors which the Corporation would have if there were no vacancies.
S-4227th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 227th
APPENDIX I ================================================================================ MARGO CARIBE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS For the Year Ended December 31, 1999 ================================================================================
S-4228th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 228th
MARGO CARIBE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SCHEDULES FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999 [Download Table] PAGE --------------- Independent Auditors' Report I-2 Financial Statements: Consolidated Balance Sheets I-3 Consolidated Statements of Operations I-4 Consolidated Statements of Shareholders' Equity I-5 Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows I-6 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements I-7 SCHEDULES Schedule II - Valuation and Qualifying Accounts I-31 All other schedules have been omitted since the required information is not presented or not present in amounts sufficient to require submission of the schedules, or because the information required is included in the consolidated financial statements or notes thereto. I-1
S-4229th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 229th
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of Margo Caribe, Inc. Vega Alta, Puerto Rico We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Margo Caribe, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1999 and 1998, and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 1999. Our audits also included the financial statement schedule listed in the Index as Schedule II for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 1999. These financial statements and financial statement schedule are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the financial statements and financial statement schedule based on our audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Margo Caribe, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1999 and 1998, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 1999, in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. Also, in our opinion, such financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects, the information set forth therein. As discussed in Note 22, on February 9, 2000, the Company entered into a letter of intent concerning a proposed merger after divesting its current core business. DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP San Juan, Puerto Rico March 3, 2000 Stamp No. 1634930 affixed to original. I-2
S-4230th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 230th
MARGO CARIBE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS DECEMBER 31, 1999 AND 1998 ASSETS [Download Table] 1999 1998 ---------- ---------- Current Assets: Cash and equivalents $1,082,592 $ 747,390 Short term investments 500,000 500,000 Accounts receivable, net 1,101,722 1,228,572 Inventories 3,108,408 2,264,372 Current portion of notes receivable 475,000 - Prepaid expenses 263,447 190,804 ---------- ---------- Total current assets 6,531,169 4,931,138 Property and equipment, net 1,902,863 2,094,799 Due from shareholder 290,226 290,226 Notes receivable, net of current portion 67,915 620,413 Other assets 124,808 53,632 ---------- ---------- Total assets $8,916,981 $7,990,208 ========== ========== LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY Current liabilities: Current portion of long-term debt $ 129,656 $ 158,468 Notes payable 1,100,000 500,000 Accounts payable 812,672 665,140 Accrued expenses 182,395 211,077 ---------- ---------- Total current liabilities 2,224,723 1,534,685 Deferred revenue 111,885 - Long-term debt, net of current portion 338,597 85,880 ---------- ---------- Total liabilities 2,675,205 1,620,565 ---------- ---------- Commitments and contingencies Shareholders' equity: Preferred stock, $0.01 par value; 250,000 shares authorized, no shares issued - - Common stock, $.001 par value; 10,000,000 shares authorized, 1,915,122 shares issued, 1,875,322 shares outstanding 1,915 1,915 Additional paid-in capital 4,637,706 4,637,706 Retained earnings 1,698,443 1,826,310 Treasury stock, 39,800 common shares, at cost (96,288) (96,288) ---------- ---------- Total shareholders' equity 6,241,776 6,369,643 ---------- ---------- Total liabilities and shareholders' equity $8,916,981 $7,990,208 ========== ========== See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements. I-3
S-4231st Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 231st
MARGO CARIBE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999, 1998, 1997 [Download Table] 1999 1998 1997 ----------- ----------- ---------- Net Sales $6,201,233 $ 5,349,244 $6,548,912 Cost of Sales 3,971,122 3,623,071 5,183,577 ---------- ----------- ---------- Gross profit 2,230,111 1,726,173 1,365,335 Selling, general and administrative expenses 2,395,350 2,122,976 2,604,106 ---------- ----------- ---------- Loss from operations (165,239) (396,803) (1,238,771) ---------- ---------- ---------- Other income (expense): Interest income 105,914 122,683 73,060 Interest expense (46,876) (62,020) (73,274) Write-down of note receivable (80,000) (201,621) - Recovery of loss (loss) from damages caused by Hurricane Georges, net of insurance proceeds 12,880 (609,009) - Gain on sale of land in South Florida - - 474,574 Other income 45,454 33,933 13,877 ---------- ---------- ---------- 37,372 (716,034) 488,237 ---------- ---------- ---------- Net loss $ (127,867) $(1,112,837) $ (750,534) ========== =========== ========== Basic and diluted loss per common share $ (.07) $ (.59) $ (.40) ========== =========== ========== See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements. I-4
S-4232nd Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 232nd
MARGO CARIBE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999, 1998 AND 1997 [Enlarge/Download Table] OUTSTANDING COMMON COMMON ADDITIONAL CUMULATIVE STOCK STOCK PAID-IN RETAINED TREASURY TRANSLATION SHARES AMOUNT CAPITAL EARNINGS STOCK ADJUSTMENT TOTAL ------------ ------ --------- -------- -------- ----------- ------ Balance at December 31, 1996 1,895,322 $1,915 $4,637,706 $3,689,681 $(48,788) $(9,164) $8,271,350 Realized loss on translation adjustment - - - - - 9,164 9,164 Net loss - - - (750,534) - - (750,534) --------- ------ ---------- ---------- -------- -------- ---------- Balance at December 31, 1997 1,895,322 1,915 4,637,706 2,939,147 (48,788) - 7,529,980 Net loss - - - (1,112,837) - - (1,112,837) Acquisition of treasury stock, at cost (20,000) - - - (47,500) - (47,500) --------- ------ ---------- ---------- -------- -------- ---------- Balance at December 31, 1998 1,875,322 1,915 4,637,706 1,826,310 (96,288) - 6,369,643 Net loss - - - (127,867) - - (127,867) --------- ------ ---------- ---------- -------- -------- ---------- Balance at December 31, 1999 1,875,322 $1,915 $4,637,706 $ 1,698,443 $(96,288) $ - $ 6,241,776 ========= ====== ========== ========== ======== ======== ========== See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements. I-5
S-4233rd Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 233rd
MARGO CARIBE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999, 1998 AND 1997 [Enlarge/Download Table] 1999 1998 1997 ---- ---- ---- Cash flows operating activities: Net loss $ (127,867) $(1,112,837) $ (750,534) Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities: Depreciation and amortization 543,165 527,791 491,634 Write-down of note receivable 80,000 201,621 - Loss on disposal of property and equipment related to Hurricane Georges - 171,039 - Realized loss on translation adjustment - - 9,164 Gain on sale of land in South Florida - - (474,574) Provision for bad debts 86,000 35,900 37,515 Gain on sale of equipment (16,451) - - Changes in assets and liabilities affecting cash flows from operating activities: Accounts receivable 152,735 (213,523) (80,517) Inventories (844,036) 173,756 298,981 Prepaid expenses (72,643) (89,012) 14,244 Advances from (to) shareholder - 1,255 (17,829) Other assets (71,176) 5,279 8,238 Accounts payable 147,532 276,822 (242,254) Accrued expenses (28,682) 46,812 (12,421) Income taxes payable - - (23,492) ---------- ---------- ----------- Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities (151,423) 24,903 (741,845) ---------- ---------- ----------- Cash flows from investing activities: Decrease in short term investments - - 504,000 Purchases of property and equipment (394,688) (374,034) (109,639) Proceeds from sale of equipment 59,910 - - Proceeds from sale of land in South Florida - - 812,630 Increase in notes receivable (5,611) - (6,800) Collection on notes receivable 3,109 40,000 - ---------- ---------- ----------- Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities (337,280) (334,034) 1,200,191 ---------- ---------- ----------- Cash flows from financing activities: Increase in notes payable 600,000 - - Acquisition of treasury stock - (47,500) - Proceeds from long-term debt 395,418 - - Repayments of long-term debt (171,513) (126,229) (174,586) ---------- ---------- ----------- Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities 823,905 (173,729) (174,586) ---------- ---------- ----------- Net increase (decrease) in cash and equivalents 335,202 (482,860) 283,760 Cash and equivalents at beginning of year 747,390 1,230,250 946,490 ---------- ---------- ----------- Cash and equivalents at end of year $1,082,592 $ 747,390 $ 1,230,250 ========== ========== =========== See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements. I-6
S-4234th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 234th
MARGO CARIBE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS DECEMBER 31, 1999, 1998 AND 1997 Note 1 - Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies Margo Caribe, Inc. and subsidiaries (all Commonwealth of Puerto Rico corporations and collectively, the "Company") are primarily engaged in the production and distribution of a wide range of tropical plants for sale to interior and exterior landscapers, wholesalers and retailers. The Company is also engaged in the manufacturing and distribution of its own line ("Rain Forest") of planting media, sales and distribution of lawn and garden products, and provides landscaping design installation and maintenance services. The Company is also engaged in seeking real estate sites for the development of residential housing projects. The Company's primary facility is located in Vega Alta, Puerto Rico. From this facility, the Company sells principally to customers in Puerto Rico and the Caribbean. Effective June 1, 1998, the Company adopted a holding company structure. The restructuring was accomplished by means of Margo Nursery Farms, Inc. ("Margo") transferring substantially all of its assets and liabilities to a newly formed Puerto Rico subsidiary ("Newco") in return for all the outstanding stock of Newco. Newco continued to conduct the business previously operated by Margo as a wholly-owned subsidiary of Margo and operates under the name of Margo Nursery Farms, Inc. Margo now acts as the holding company for Newco as well as the other existing subsidiaries of Margo. In connection with the holding company restructuring, Margo changed its corporate name to Margo Caribe, Inc. As further described in Note 22, during 2000 the Company may dispose of all of its operating businesses as part of a proposed merger. (a) Principles of Consolidation For the years ended December 31, 1999 and 1998, the accompanying consolidated financial statements include the financial statements of Margo Caribe, Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, Margo Nursery Farms, Inc., Margo Landscaping and Design, Inc., Margo Garden Products, Inc., Rain Forest Products Group, Inc. and Margo Development Corporation. For the year ended December 31, 1997, the consolidated financial statements I-7
S-4235th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 235th
also include the financial statements of Margo Bay Farms, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiaries, Tropiflower, Inc. and Margo Imports, B.V. (a Netherlands company). These entities were merged with and into Margo Bay Farms, Inc. in 1997, in connection with the Company's decision to close operations in South Florida. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. (b) Cash Equivalents For purposes of the statements of cash flows, the Company considers all highly liquid debt instruments purchased with an original maturity of three months of less to be cash equivalents. At December 31, 1999 and 1998, cash and equivalents include $500,000 invested in a certificate of deposit bearing interest at 5.3% and 4.6%, respectively, which has been pledged as collateral for notes payable (refer to Note 8). (c) Inventories Inventory of plant material includes the cost of seeds, cuttings, pots, soil, chemicals, fertilizers, direct labor and an allocation of overhead costs such as depreciation and rent, among others. Inventories of plant material are stated at the lower of cost (first-in, first-out) or market. Inventories of lawn and garden products are stated at the lower of average cost of market. (d) Property and Equipment and Related Depreciation and Amortization Property and equipment are carried at acquisition cost. Depreciation and amortization are provided over the estimated useful lives of the respective assets on a straight-line basis. Such useful lives range from four to twenty years. The Company considers depreciation of certain facilities and equipment as a direct cost of production of inventory. As inventory is sold, such cost is charged to cost of sales. I-8
S-4236th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 236th
(e) Foreign Currency Translation Assets and liabilities outside the United States and Puerto Rico are translated to U.S. Dollars using exchange rates at the balance sheet date. Revenues and expenses are translated at the average rates of exchange during the applicable period. Effects of translation adjustments are deferred and included as a separate component of shareholders' equity. There were no balances or transactions involving foreign currency translation as of December 31, 1999 and 1998, or for the years then ended. (f) Revenue Recognition The Company recognizes sales of foliage and lawn and garden products upon shipment from its facilities to customers. Revenues from landscaping services are recognized as plants are installed at the customers' facilities. Certain hurricane-related government assistance has been deferred and will be recognized into income on a straight-line basis over a ten-year period during which certain conditions must be complied with. (g) Income Tax The Company follows the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 109, "Accounting for Income Taxes". SFAS No. 109 requires the use of the asset and liability method in accounting for income taxes. Deferred income taxes are recognized for the future tax consequences of temporary differences between the financial statement carrying amounts and the tax bases of assets and liabilities. Through December 31, 1997, the Company was a Florida corporation and filed a final federal corporate income tax return for the taxable year then ended. However, the Company elected to be treated as a possessions corporation under Section 936 of the Internal Revenue Code, and accordingly, received a credit of federal income tax payable for operations in Puerto Rico. Margo Bay Farms, Inc., a former wholly-owned Florida subsidiary, filed a final federal income tax return for the year ended December 31, 1997. I-9
S-4237th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 237th
The Agricultural Tax Incentives Act of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico ("Act No. 225" of December 1, 1995, as amended) provides the Company with a 90% tax exemption for income derived from "bonafide" agricultural business, including sales of nursery plants within Puerto Rico and outside Puerto Rico, as well as a 100% exemption from property, municipal and excise taxes. (h) Loss per Common Share The Company reports its earnings per share ("EPS") using Financial Accounting Standards Board Statement No. 128, "Earnings Per Share" ("SFAS 128"). SFAS 128 requires dual presentation of basic and diluted EPS. Basic EPS is computed by dividing income available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted EPS reflects the potential dilution that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised or converted into common stock. (i) Fair Value of Financial Instruments The amounts included in the consolidated financial statements for cash and equivalents, short term investments, accounts receivable, notes payable, accounts payable and accrued expenses reflect their fair value due to the short-term maturity of these instruments. The fair values of the Company's other financial instruments are discussed in Notes 5 and 9. (j) Impairment of Long-Lived Assets The carrying value of property and equipment is evaluated periodically for recoverability when considered in relation to the expected future undiscounted cash flows of the underlying business over the estimated remaining useful life of the asset. (k) Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation Plans The Company accounts for its stock-based compensation plans pursuant to the provisions of Accounting Principles Board Opinion 25 and related interpretations, which generally require that compensation cost be recognized to the extent the market price of the related stock exceeds the exercise price at the I-10
S-4238th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 238th
measurement date. However, Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 ("SFAS 123"), "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation", provides an alternative method for measuring compensation cost by measuring the fair value of the option at the award date. Although the compensation cost measurement criteria is not required to be adopted, SFAS 123 requires disclosure of pro forma information regarding the effects of the application of its compensation cost measurement criteria and of other information. (l) Use of Estimates in the Preparation of Financial Statements The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. The allowance for doubtful accounts is an amount that management believes will be adequate to absorb estimated losses on existing accounts receivable that may become uncollectible based on evaluations of collectibility and prior credit experience. Because of uncertainties inherent in the estimation process, management's estimate of credit losses inherent in the existing accounts receivable and related allowance may change in the near term. The Company has recorded a deferred tax asset of approximately $608,000 which is offset in full by a valuation allowance. Realization of the deferred tax asset is dependent on generating sufficient taxable income in the future. The amount of the deferred tax asset considered realizable could change in the near term if estimates of future income are increased. I-11
S-4239th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 239th
Note 2 - Inventories At December 31, 1999 and 1998, inventories comprised the following: Description 1999 1998 -------------------------------- ---------- ------- Plant material $2,417,102 $1,700,250 Lawn and garden products 485,017 347,637 Raw material and supplies 206,289 216,485 ---------- ---------- $3,108,408 $2,264,372 Note 3 - Accounts Receivable At December 31, 1999 and 1998, accounts receivable comprised the following: Description 1999 1998 --------------------------- ---------- ------- Trade receivables $1,054,120 $1,260,629 Hurricane assistance(Note 10) 111,885 - Government reimbursement 50,000 57,887 Accrued interest 13,823 6,140 Employee advances 12,180 16,063 Other accounts receivable 17,714 11,553 ---------- ---------- 1,259,722 1,352,272 Less allowance for doubtful accounts (158,000) (123,700) ---------- ---------- $1,101,722 $1,228,572 ========== ========== Note 4 - Short Term Investments At December 31, 1999 and 1998, short term investments consisted of a $500,000 certificate of deposit bearing interest at 5.4% and 4.5%, respectively, which was pledged as collateral for notes payable (refer to Note 8). I-12
S-4240th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 240th
Note 5 - Notes Receivable The Company owns a note receivable with an outstanding principal balance of $996,962, from the sale of Cariplant S.A. ("Cariplant") a former Dominican Republic subsidiary, to Altec International C. por A. ("Altec"), another Dominican Republic company. The note is collateralized by the common stock and personal guarantee of the major shareholder of Cariplant. From the inception of the note in March 1993, the Company received several payments through December 1995. However, Altec has been unable to comply with the terms of the note. Due to the unfavorable collection experience as well as the difficulties of operating in the Dominican Republic, in 1994 Company management wrote down the carrying amount of the note to $316,000, representing the estimated value of Cariplant's land and related improvements, including buildings, shadehouses, and fixed and installed equipment. On February 12, 1997, the Company obtained a junior lien in Cariplant's property and equipment and entered into an agreement with Altec to modify the repayment terms of the unpaid principal balance of $996,962, with payments of principal and interest commencing in the year 2000. Payment of interest on the note was waived through January 1, 2000. On September 23, 1998, the Dominican Republic was struck by Hurricane Georges severely damaging Cariplant's facilities. As a result of the damages caused by the hurricane, the Company determined to write down the carrying value of the note to $100,000. The write down, amounting to $201,621 was included as an other expense in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 1998. Altec is now in default with the modified repayment terms. As a result, the Company wrote down the carrying value of the note to $20,000, and has included the $80,000 charge as other expense in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 1999. I-13
S-4241st Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 241st
At December 31, 1999 and 1998, notes receivable comprised the following: [Enlarge/Download Table] Description 1999 1998 --------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------- ----------- Note receivable from Altec $ 20,000 $100,000 8% mortgage note, collateralized by land in South Florida with interest payments due monthly and principal due in a balloon payment on November 28, 2000 (refer to Note 17(a)) 475,000 475,000 10% note, collateralized by real property 26,331 26,331 Non-interest bearing notes, due on demand, Personally guaranteed by present Company personnel 21,584 19,082 -------- -------- 542,915 620,413 Less current portion (475,000) - -------- -------- $ 67,915 $620,413 ======== ======== Amounts reflected in the balance sheet for notes receivable approximate their current fair values based on market interest rates for comparable risks, maturities and collateral. With respect to the Altec note, management believes it is not practicable to estimate its fair value because of the difference between the face value of the note and its carrying amount, as well as other factors. Note 6 - Property and Equipment At December 31, 1999 and 1998, property and equipment comprised the following: 1999 1998 ---- ---- Leasehold improvements $1,609,137 $1,590,145 Equipment and fixtures 1,534,280 1,618,312 Transportation equipment 326,422 407,266 Real estate property 224,327 224,327 ---------- ---------- 3,694,166 3,840,050 Less accumulated depreciation and amortization (1,791,303) (1,745,251) ---------- ---------- $1,902,863 $2,094,799 ========== ========== I-14
S-4242nd Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 242nd
During the years ended December 31, 1999, 1998 and 1997, depreciation expense charged to production was approximately $293,000, $276,000, and $258,000, respectively. Note 7 Due from Shareholder At December 31, 1999 and 1998, amounts due from shareholder principally arise from the settlement of litigation with the Company's former principal lender as well as other advances of $4,688 made by the Company on his behalf. In March 1998, the Company's major shareholder signed a non-interest bearing note due in March 2001 for $285,538 of the outstanding balance. Note 8 - Notes Payable At December 31, 1999 and 1998, the Company had short-term borrowings with a commercial bank in Puerto Rico, comprised of the following: Description 1999 1998 ------------------------------------ ---- ---- Unsecured commercial line of credit of $1 million, bearing interest at 2% over Libor rate (8.15% at December 31,1999)due in February 2000 $ 100,000 $ - Note payable, collateralized by cash equivalent invested in a certifi- cate of deposit, bearing interest at 1% over interest earned by the certificate (6.3% at December 31, 1999)due on demand 500,000 - Note payable, collateralized by short term borrowings invested in a certificate of deposit, bearing interest at 1% over interest earned by the certificate (6.4% and 5.5% at December 31, 1999 and 1998, respectively)due on demand 500,000 500,000 ---------- -------- $1,100,000 $500,000 ========== ======== I-15
S-4243rd Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 243rd
Note 9 - Long-Term Debt At December 31, 1999 and 1998, long-term debt comprised the following: Description 1999 1998 ------------------------------------ ---- ---- Five-year term loans, bearing interest at 2% over Libor rate (8.15% at December 31, 1999), payable in quarterly installments of $19,781, through December 2004 $395,418 $ - Five-year term loans, variable interest rate, 8.25% and 8.0% at December 31, 1999 and 1998, respectively, payable in quarterly installments of approximately $31,000 through January 2000 and $8,000 through October 2001, including interest. The loans are collateralized by transportation and farm equipment 72,835 214,871 9.25% commercial loan, payable in monthly installments of $2,000, including interest, through April 2000, collateralized by real estate property (prepaid during 1999) - 29,477 -------- -------- 468,253 244,348 Less current portion (129,656) (158,468) -------- -------- Long-term debt $338,597 $ 85,880 ======== ======== Based on borrowing rates currently available to the Company for loans with similar terms and maturities, the fair value of long-term debt approximates the recorded amounts. The annual aggregate maturities of long-term debt are as follows: Year Ending December 31, Amount ------------ ------ 2000 $129,656 2001 103,403 2002 79,128 2003 79,128 2004 76,938 ------- $468,253 ======== I-16
S-4244th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 244th
Note 10 - Hurricane Georges On September 21, 1998, Puerto Rico was struck by Hurricane Georges, a category 3 hurricane on the Saffir/Simpson scale. The hurricane severely damaged a portion of the Company's facilities (shadehouses) and inventory of plant material. For the year ended December 31, 1998, as a result of the damages caused by the hurricane, the Company recorded the following loss: Description Amount ----------- ------ Inventory damaged or destroyed $ 361,767 Restoration, clean-up and debris removal 696,373 Net carrying value of property destroyed 171,039 ---------- 1,229,179 Less: Proceeds from insurance claims (620,170) ---------- Loss from damages caused by the hurricane $ 609,009 ========== During 1999, the Company received an assistance payment of $12,880 from the Farm Service Agency of the United States Department of Agriculture for debris removal from damages caused by the hurricane. This assistance was recorded as other income in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 1999. The Puerto Rico Department of Agriculture has committed to provide assistance to bona-fide agricultural enterprises for damages caused by the hurricane. At December 31, 1999, the Puerto Rico Department of Agriculture had approved $111,885 in assistance, subject to the formalization of an agreement, which among other things requires the facility to be operated as a nursery farm for a minimum period of ten years from the date of signing. Accordingly, the Company recorded a receivable and a deferred revenue to account for the assistance at December 31, 1999. Note 11 - Income Taxes The Company provides for income taxes using the applicable statutory tax rates in the related jurisdiction where it operates. I-17
S-4245th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 245th
Set forth below are explanations for the differences between the income tax provision (benefit) and the amount computed by applying the Puerto Rico statutory income tax rate of 39% (for 1997, the federal statutory income tax rate of 34% was used) to loss before income tax provision: [Download Table] 1999 1998 1997 ----- ---- ---- Income tax benefit computed by applying tax rate $(49,870) $(434,005) $(255,181) (Increase) decrease in income tax benefit resulting from: Puerto Rico tax exemption (66,519) 334,951 141,706 Effect of Florida and Puerto Rico taxes (benefits) - - (11,807) Increase (decrease) in valuation allowances 116,389 99,054 (469,100) Federal tax attributes lost as result of reorganization, including net operating loss carryforwards - - 580,960 Other differences - - 13,422 ---------- ---------- ---------- $ - $ - $ - ========= ========== ========== Deferred income taxes were recognized in the consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 1999 and 1998 due to the tax effect of temporary differences and loss carryforwards as follows: 1999 1998 ---- ---- Deferred tax assets: Net operating loss carryforwards $603,048 $352,880 Valuation allowance for accounts receivable 5,371 5,029 -------- ------- 608,419 357,909 Less valuation allowance (608,419) (357,909) -------- ------- Net deferred tax asset $ - $ - ======== ======== I-18
S-4246th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 246th
Note 12 - Loss Per Common Share Basic and diluted loss per common share for the years ended December 31, 1999, 1998 and 1997 were determined as follows: Basic loss per common share: 1999 1998 1997 --------------------------- --------- ----------- -------- Net loss available to common shareholders $(127,867) $(1,112,837) $(750,534) ========= =========== ========= Weighted average number of common shares outstanding 1,875,322 1,878,655 1,895,322 ========= =========== ========= Basic loss per common share $ (.07) $ .59) $ (.40) ========= =========== ========= Diluted loss per common share: ----------------------------- Net loss available to common shareholders $(127,867) $(1,112,837) $(750,534) ========= =========== ========= Weighted average number of common shares outstanding 1,875,322 1,878,655 1,895,322 Plus incremental shares from assumed exercise of stock options - - - ---------- ----------- --------- Adjusted weighted average shares 1,875,322 1,878,655 1,895,322 ========== =========== ========= Diluted loss per common share $ (.07) $ (.59) $ (.40) ========== =========== ========= For the years ended December 31, 1999, 1998 and 1997, the effect of the assumed exercise of stock options determined by using the treasury stock method was antidilutive; thus no incremental shares were added to the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Note 13 - Commitments and Contingencies The Company is a party to various legal actions arising in the ordinary course of business. In the opinion of management, the disposition of these matters will not have a material adverse effect on the financial condition or results of operations of the Company. On August 31, 1999, the Company entered into an option agreement to purchase approximately 109 acres of land in the Municipality of Barceloneta, Puerto Rico. The Company paid $47,500 for the option agreement, which will be applied to the purchase price of the land of $950,000. The option expires on April 16, 2000. I-19
S-4247th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 247th
Note 14 - Shareholders' Equity (a) Preferred stock The certificate of incorporation of the Company authorizes the issuance of 250,000 shares of one cent ($0.01) par value serial preferred stock, and the Board of Directors is authorized from time to time to divide the preferred stock into series and to determine the number of shares of each series and the relative rights, preferences and limitations of each such series. (b) Treasury Stock At December 31, 1999, the Company had 39,800 shares of common stock in treasury, of which 19,800 shares were acquired in 1988 at a cost of $48,788, and 20,000 shares were acquired in 1998 at a cost of $47,500. Note 15 - Lease and Option Agreements (a) Property in Vega Alta, Puerto Rico The primary Puerto Rico facility is leased from Michael J. Spector and Margaret D. Spector (the "Spectors"), who are officers, directors and major shareholders of the Company. Effective January 1, 1993, the Company entered into a lease agreement with the Spectors for an initial five year period at a monthly rental of $19,000. In addition, the Spectors have released the Company from responsibility from any claims arising from the Company's use of a defective fungicide in its operations at the nursery facility. The Company had an option to renew this lease for an additional five year period at the greater of $24,000 per month, or the original $19,000 per month adjusted on the basis of the increase in the Wholesale Price Index ("WPI") published by the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, from the WPI which was in effect on January 1, 1993 to the WPI in effect on January 1, 1998. On January 1, 1998, the Company exercised its option to renew the lease agreement with the Spectors at a monthly rental of $24,000. The Spectors have committed to grant the Company an option to extend the lease for an additional period of five years ending December 31, 2007. I-20
S-4248th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 248th
Under the above lease agreement, the Company has the option to purchase the nursery facility at any time during the term of the lease, based on the property's appraised value. The Company pays $1,000 per month for this purchase option, which amount is expensed when paid. Effective January 1, 1994, the Company amended the lease agreement with the Spectors to include an additional 27 acres of land adjacent to the nursery facility at a monthly rental of $1,750. This amendment did not provide for renewal nor purchase options towards the additional 27 acres of land. Effective January 1, 1998, the Company and the Spectors entered into an amendment to the lease agreement which grants the Company the right to continue to lease the 27 acre parcel on a month to month basis. Either party may terminate this portion of the lease upon 30 days prior written notice. In connection with this lease amendment, the Spectors also agreed to reimburse the Company by no later than March 1, 2001 for the unamortized value (approximately $45,000 at February 1, 2000) of the leasehold improvements applicable to said parcel as of the date of termination. Effective February 1, 2000, the lease agreement with respect to the 27 acre parcel terminated. Total rental payments amounted to approximately $309,000 in 1999 and 1998 and $249,000 in 1997. (b) Property in Barranquitas, Puerto Rico Effective January 1, 1997, the Company entered into a lease agreement with Cali Orchids, Inc. to lease a 13 acre nursery facility located in the town of Barranquitas, Puerto Rico. The lease has an initial term of five years and may be renewed for two additional five-year terms at the Company's option. During the first year of the initial five-year term of the lease, monthly payments amount to $4,500. During the remaining four years of the initial term of the lease, monthly payments amount to $5,000. During the first and second renewal terms, monthly payments increase to $6,000 and $7,000, respectively. The lease agreement does not provide for any purchase option. I-21
S-4249th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 249th
Total rental payments amounted to $60,000, $45,000 and $54,000 for the years ended December 31, 1999, 1998 and 1997, respectively. Lease payments for 1998 reflect a rent abatement of $15,000 due to damages caused by Hurricane Georges. (c) Other Properties in Vega Alta, Puerto Rico On March 24, 1999, the Company leased two additional parcels of land from the Puerto Rico Land Authority (an instrumentality of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico). The two parcels are adjacent to each other, have a total area of 321 acres, and are located approximately one mile from the Company's main nursery facility in Vega Alta. Among other things, the lease agreement provides for an initial lease term of five years subject to three additional renewal terms of five years, at the option of the Company. During the initial term, total lease payments amount to $33,625 per year. During 1999, lease payments of $25,219 were made. Lease payments for renewal terms are to be negotiated 90 days prior to each renewal term. (d) Aggregate Lease Obligations and Expenses The Company's obligations under the above and other non-cancelable operating lease agreements in force at December 31, 1999, assuming the Company exercises its renewal option on the Barranquitas, Puerto Rico property and excluding the monthly payments for the purchase option previously mentioned, are as follows: Year ending Minimum December 31, Lease Payments ------------ -------------- 2000 $ 416,500 2001 415,700 2002 426,700 2003 132,200 2004 99,400 Thereafter 600,500 --------- $2,091,000 ========== Total rental expense under all operating lease agreements amounted to approximately $400,000, $354,000 and $303,000, for the years ended December 31, 1999, 1998 and 1997, respectively. I-22
S-4250th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 250th
Note 16 - Stock Option and Salary Deferral Plans Effective April 1998, the Company adopted the 1998 Stock Option Plan (the "1998 Plan") to replace the Company's 1988 Stock Benefits Plan (the "1988 Plan"). Outstanding options granted under the previous plan, including all related obligations and commitments, will continue to be honored by the Company. Under the 1998 Plan, the Company's Board of Directors, through a committee, can award options to purchase up to 200,000 shares of common stock (exclusive of outstanding options under the previous plan) to eligible employees at 100% of the fair market value at the time of the grant, except that options granted to persons owning 10% or more of the outstanding common stock carry an exercise price equal to 110% of the fair market value at the date of grant. The 1998 Plan also provides for the automatic grant of options to purchase 2,500 shares of common stock to each non-employee director on the first business day following every annual meeting of shareholders. Options vest ratably over a period of five years, become exercisable one year from the date of grant and expire ten years after the date of grant. The status of the stock options granted under the 1998 Plan and the prior 1988 Plan as of December 31, 1997, 1998 and 1999, and changes during the years ended on those dates, are as follows: [Enlarge/Download Table] Price per Share --------------------------------------- Weighted Average Description Shares Range Price ----------------------------------------------- --------------- ----------------------- ----- Outstanding, January 1, 1997 113,750 $2.00 to $3.44 $3.06 Granted - - - Exercised - - - Forfeited (27,500) 2.00 to 3.13 2.88 -------- -------------- ---- Outstanding, December 31, 1997 86,250 2.00 to 3.44 3.12 Granted 31,000 1.50 to 1.94 1.81 Exercised - - - Forfeited (1,250) 2.00 2.00 -------- -------------- ---- Outstanding, December 31, 1998 116,000 1.50 to 3.44 2.78 Granted 20,000 2.25 to 2.75 2.41 Exercised - - - Forfeited (1,500) 1.94 to 3.13 2.73 -------- -------------- ---- Outstanding, December 31, 1999 134,500 $1.50 to $3.44 $2.72 ======== ============== ===== I-23
S-4251st Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 251st
The following table summarizes information about stock options outstanding at December 31, 1999: [Enlarge/Download Table] Options Outstanding Options Excercisable -------------------------------------------- -- --------------------------------- Weighted Average Weighted Remaining Average Weighted Average Range of Contractual Exercise Exercise Exercise Price Outstanding Life (years) Price Exercisable Price --------------- ----------- ------------- -------- ----------- -------------- $2.88 - $3.16 43,500 3.5 $ 3.01 43,500 $3.01 3.13 - 3.44 40,500 6.6 3.26 24,300 3.26 1.50 - 1.94 30,500 8.4 1.81 6,100 1.81 2.25 - 2.75 20,000 9.4 2.41 - - ---------------- --------- ----------- ------- -------- ------ $1.50 - $3.44 134,500 6.4 $2.72 73,900 $2.99 =============== ========= =========== ======= ======== ====== The Company applies Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, "Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees", and related interpretations in measuring stock based compensation, including options. Accordingly, no compensation expense has been recognized for options granted under both plans. Had compensation expense been determined based upon the fair value at the grant date for awards under any plan consistent with SFAS No. 123, "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation", ("SFAS No. 123") the Company's net loss and net loss per share, on a pro forma basis, would not have significantly changed from those reported. The Company did not recognize compensation cost for the options granted to non-employees pursuant to the requirements of SFAS No. 123 because its effect was not significant. During 1998, the Company established a Salary Deferral Retirement Plan (the "Retirement Plan") under the provisions of Article 1165(a)(4) of the regulations under the Puerto Rico Internal Revenue Code of 1994. The retirement plan covers all employees who are at least 21 years old and have completed one year of service. The Company did not make any cash contributions to the retirement plan during 1998. For the year ended December 31, 1999, the Company paid approximately $38,000, representing the matching contributions under the retirement plan for all participants. I-24
S-4252nd Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 252nd
Note 17 - Supplemental Disclosures for the Statements of Cash Flows (a) Non-Cash Investing Activities During the year ended December 31, 1999, fully depreciated equipment with a cost of $454,877 was written off, and equipment with a cost of $66,129 and a book value of $43,459 was sold at a gain of $16,451. Also, during 1999, an account receivable and a deferred revenue in the amount of $111,885 were established in connection with certain government assistance. During the year ended December 31, 1998, the Company wrote off fully depreciated equipment with a cost of $505,070. Also during 1998, the Company wrote off leasehold improvements with a cost of $365,278 and a book value of $171,039, as a result of damages caused by Hurricane Georges. During the year ended December 31, 1997, the Company wrote off stock plants with a cost of $97,277 and a book value of $72,951. The write off was charged to an accrual made as of December 31, 1996, for the possible impairment of assets at the Company's South Florida location. During 1997, the Company sold two properties at its South Florida location with a cost of $1,088,594 and a book value of $990,105. Included in the determination of the $474,574 gain on the sale of the property sold were $177,049 representing the remaining balance of the accrual made at December 31, 1996 for the possible impairment of assets at the Company's South Florida location. In connection with the sale of one of the properties, the Company received a $475,000 mortgage note from the buyer as part of the sales price. (b) Other Cash Flow Transactions During the years ended December 31, 1999, 1998 and 1997, the Company made interest payments of approximately $44,400, $62,000, and $75,500, respectively. During the years ended December 31, 1999, 1998 and 1997, the Company did not make any income tax payments. I-25
S-4253rd Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 253rd
Note 18 - Major Customers During 1999, the Company's two largest customers accounted for approximately 26% ($1,592,000) of the Company's net sales. The first customer accounted for 14% ($864,000) and the second customer accounted for 12% ($728,000) of the Company's net sales. During 1998 and 1997 the Company's single largest customer accounted for approximately 13% ($683,000) and 24% ($1,540,000), respectively, of the Company's net sales. Note 19 - Disposal of Margo Bay Farms, Inc. On August 15, 1997, after a review of past and present performance of the Company's South Florida operation, and in view of the strong competition in that market, inadequate sales levels and lack of profitability, the Company's Board of Directors made the determination to close this operation effective September 30, 1997, and dispose of all related assets. On September 29 and November 28, 1997, the Company sold the two nursery farms (a 54 acre and a 20 acre parcel) which comprised the Company's facility in South Florida, resulting in a gain of $474,574. The South Florida operation which closed effective September 30, 1997, accounted for net sales of approximately $478,000, and incurred a net loss of $27,000 for the year ended December 31, 1997. Note 20 - Significant Concentration of Risk As discussed in Note 1, the Company's operations are principally concentrated in Puerto Rico. The Company's operations are vulnerable to severe weather, such as hurricanes, floods, storms and, to a lesser extent, plant disease and pests. The Company believes that it currently maintains adequate insurance coverage for its facilities and equipment. As of December 31, 1999, the Company had been unable to obtain adequate crop and business interruption insurance coverage at a reasonable cost. The Company intends to continue to seek to obtain crop and business interruption insurance coverage at reasonable rates. However, no assurance can be given that the Company will be able to obtain such insurance coverages. I-26
S-4254th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 254th
The Company believes it has taken reasonable precautions to protect its plants and operations from natural hazards. The Company's newer facilities are being constructed with fabricated steel in an attempt to reduce the damage from any future storms. Each of the Company's operations currently has access to a plentiful water supply and facilities for the protection of many of their weather-sensitive plants. Accounts receivable are due from customers resident in Puerto Rico. Concentration of credit risk with respect to accounts receivable is mitigated by monitoring the operations and financial strength of the Company's customers. Certain short-term certificates of deposit are placed with local financial institutions. Such credit risk is mitigated by depositing the funds with high credit quality financial institutions and limiting the amount of credit exposure in any financial institution. Note 21 - Segment Information In June 1997, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement No. 131, Disclosure about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information ("SFAS 131"). SFAS 131 establishes standards for the way an enterprise reports information about operating segments in annual financial statements and requires that enterprises report selected information about operating segments in interim financial reports issued to shareholders. Operating segments are components of an enterprise about which separate financial information is available that is evaluated regularly by the chief operating decision maker in deciding how to allocate resources and in assessing performance. SFAS 131 requires a reconciliation of total segment revenue and expense items and segment assets to the amount in the enterprise's financial statements. SFAS 131 also requires a descriptive report on how the operating segments were determined, the products and services provided by the operating segments, and any measurement differences used for segment reporting and financial statement reporting. The Company's management monitors and manages the financial performance of three primary business segments: the production and distribution of plants, sales of lawn and garden products and landscaping services. The accounting policies of the segments are the same as those described in the summary of significant accounting policies. The Company evaluates performance based on net income or loss. I-27
S-4255th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 255th
The financial information presented below was derived from the internal management accounting system and is based on internal management accounting policies. The information presented does not necessarily represent each segments' financial condition and results of operations as if they were independent entities. [Enlarge/Download Table] 1999 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Lawn & Garden Plants Products Landscaping Totals ------------------ -------------------- ----------------- --------------- Revenue from external customers $3,780,645 $1,120,342 $1,300,246 $6,201,233 Intersegment revenues 186,453 24,727 - 211,180 Interest income 105,914 - - 105,914 Interest expense 46,876 - - 46,876 Depreciation and amortization 444,765 33,868 64,532 543,165 Segment income (loss) 167,844 (132,515) (163,196) (127,867) Segment assets 7,472,038 939,588 505,355 8,916,981 Expenditures for segment assets 296,380 53,015 45,293 394,688 1998 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Lawn & Garden Plants Products Landscaping Totals ------------------ -------------------- ----------------- --------------- Revenue from external customers $3,019,406 $ 862,050 $1,467,788 $5,349,244 Intersegment revenues 247,785 26,736 - 274,521 Interest income 122,683 - - 122,683 Interest expense 62,020 - - 62,020 Depreciation and amortization 447,285 22,436 58,070 527,791 Segment loss 899,698 142,692 70,447 1,112,837 Segment assets 6,405,425 761,623 823,160 7,990,208 Expenditures for segment assets 374,034 - - 374,034 1997 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Lawn & Garden Plants Products Landscaping Totals ------------------ -------------------- ----------------- --------------- Revenue from external customers $3,435,291 $1,389,617 $1,724,004 $6,548,912 Intersegment revenues 415,896 57,487 - 473,383 Interest income 73,060 - - 73,060 Interest expense 73,274 - - 73,274 Depreciation and amortization 412,716 22,652 56,266 491,634 Segment loss 331,731 239,249 179,554 750,534 Segment assets 7,411,884 827,389 712,815 8,952,088 Expenditures for segment assets 66,826 7,304 35,509 109,639 I-28
S-4256th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 256th
Note 22 - Subsequent Event On February 9, 2000 the Company announced that it entered into a non-binding letter of intent to merge with iTract, LLC ("iTract"), a privately held developmental stage internet company building a communication tool that is designed to allow its users to deliver a targeted marketing campaign using e-mail, fax and postal mail. To date, iTract has not earned any significant revenues. iTract will seek to address the needs of businesses that desire more efficient, expedient and cost- effective ways to promote and communicate products and services to their target audiences. iTract will target small to medium sized businesses that want to reach potential customers at a lower cost than traditional direct marketing. iTract's system is designed to allow users to send out faxes, e-mails and postal mail in volume from the same document directly off the computer at the same time. iTract is also building a permission-based fax and e-mail list that is demographically organized and can be custom configured to meet the client's marketing needs. Under the proposed transaction, the Company would first reincorporate as a Delaware corporation pursuant to a merger (the "Reincorporation Merger") with a newly created Delaware corporation. A subsidiary of the new Delaware corporation would then merge with iTract (the "iTract Merger"). As a result of the iTract Merger, iTract members would receive 88% of the issued and outstanding shares of common stock of the new Delaware corporation (on a fully diluted basis assuming exercise of all outstanding stock options) in exchange for all the outstanding membership interests of iTract. Thus, following the iTract Merger, iTract members would control the new Delaware corporation, holding 88% of its common stock, with the Company's current shareholders holding 12%. Prior to the effective time of the iTract Merger, all outstanding stock options held by officers, directors and employees of the Company would vest and become immediately exercisable. Following the merger, the new corporation will be named iTract, Inc. A majority of the Board of Directors of the merged company would be composed of members designated by iTract, and iTract's management would manage the merged company. The letter of intent does not provide for any break-up fee. It is anticipated that the Reincorporation Merger will be a taxable transaction for U. S. shareholders for federal income tax purposes. I-29
S-4257th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 257th
It is a condition to the consummation of the iTract Merger that the Company sell prior to the iTract Merger its nursery and other operating businesses. In addition, as of the effective time of the merger, the Company must have at least $5 million in cash and cash equivalents and not be subject to liabilities exceeding $10,000 in the aggregate. In connection with the execution of the letter of intent, Michael J. Spector, President, Chief Executive Officer and the controlling shareholder of the Company, and another major shareholder of the Company made a $2.0 million loan to International Commerce Exchange Systems, Inc. ("ICES"), an indirect parent company of iTract. The loan is payable in a single balloon payment on the closing day of the iTract Merger. If the iTract Merger is not consummated, such loan will be converted into common stock of ICES. The parties anticipate that the transaction would close during the latter part of the second quarter or early part of the third quarter of 2000, subject to the negotiation of definitive agreements, the satisfactory completion of due diligence examinations, and the satisfaction of various other conditions customary and appropriate for this type of transaction, including the approval of the merger by the majority of the Company's and iTract's equity holders, the qualification of the iTract Merger as a tax-free reorganization for federal and Puerto Rico income tax purposes, continued listing of the shares on the NASDAQ Small Cap Market and obtaining an opinion from an investment banking firm satisfactory to the Company that the transaction is fair to shareholders from a financial point of view. The letter of intent provides that concurrent with the execution of the merger agreement, Michael J. Spector will agree to vote his Company shares, representing approximately 66% of the Company's outstanding common stock, in favor of the merger. No assurance can be given that the Company will reach a definitive merger agreement or that, if reached, the parties will be able to satisfy the conditions to the consummation of the merger. If the parties do not execute a merger agreement by April 14, 2000, the letter of intent will be automatically terminated. Note 23 - Reclassifications Certain reclassifications were made to the 1998 and 1997 consolidated financial statements in order for them to be in conformity with the 1999 presentation. I-30
S-4258th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 258th
SCHEDULE II MARGO CARIBE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999, 1998 AND 1997 [Enlarge/Download Table] COLUMN A COLUMN B COLUMN C COLLUMN D COLLUMN E --------- --------- ---------------------------------- ----------------- ------------- BALANCE CHARGED TO COSTS CHARGED TO BEGINNING AND OTHER BALANCE DESCRIPTION OF YEAR EXPENSES ACCOUNTS DEDUCTIONS END OF YEAR ----------- --------- ---------------- ---------- ---------- ------------ YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999: Allowance for doubtful accounts $123,700 $86,000 $ - $(51,700) $158,000 ======== ======= ======= ======== ======== YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998: Allowance for doubtful accounts $ 76,000 $35,900 $11,800 $ - $123,700 ======== ======= ======= ========== ======== YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997: Allowance for doubtful accounts $ 79,000 $37,515 $ - $(40,515) $ 76,000 ======== ======= =========== ======== ======== I-31
S-4259th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 259th
APPENDIX J ================================================================================ MARGO CARIBE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2000 ================================================================================
S-4260th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 260th
MARGO CARIBE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS March 31, 2000 and December 31, 1999 ASSETS 2000 1999 (Unaudited) (Audited) ----------- ----------- Current assets: Cash and equivalents $ 640,046 $ 1,082,592 Short-term investments 500,000 500,000 Accounts receivable, net 1,451,240 1,101,722 Inventories 3,120,234 3,108,408 Current portion of notes receivable 475,000 475,000 Prepaid expenses and other current assets 282,266 263,447 ----------- ----------- Total current assets 6,468,786 6,531,169 Property and equipment, net 1,786,853 1,902,863 Due from shareholder 335,610 290,226 Notes receivable 67,915 67,915 Other assets 124,808 124,808 ----------- ----------- Total assets $ 8,783,972 $ 8,916,981 =========== =========== LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY Current liabilities: Current portion of long-term debt $ 79,613 $ 129,656 Notes payable 1,100,000 1,100,000 Accounts payable 744,930 812,672 Accrued expenses 166,559 182,395 ----------- ----------- Total current liabilities 2,091,102 2,224,723 Deferred revenues 111,885 111,885 Long-term debt 338,597 338,597 ----------- ----------- Total liabilities 2,541,584 2,675,205 ----------- ----------- Commitments and contingencies - - Shareholders' equity: Preferred stock, $0.01 par value; 250,000 shares authorized, no shares issued - - Common stock, $.001 par value; 10,000,000 shares authorized; 1,922,122 shares issued, (1,915,122 in 1999) and 1,882,322 shares outstanding (1,875,322 in 1999) 1,922 1,915 Additional paid-in capital 4,657,544 4,637,706 Retained earnings 1,679,210 1,698,443 Treasury stock, 39,800 common shares, at cost (96,288) (96,288) ---------- --------- Total shareholders' equity 6,242,388 6,241,776 ----------- ---------- Total liabilities and shareholders' equity $ 8,783,972 $ 8,916,981 =========== =========== See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements. J-1
S-4261st Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 261st
MARGO CARIBE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS For the Three Months ended March 31, 2000 and 1999 (Unaudited) 2000 1999 ---------- ---------- Net sales $2,107,556 $1,533,064 Cost of sales 1,372,128 971,113 ---------- ---------- Gross profit 735,428 561,951 Selling, general and administrative expenses 608,404 525,800 ---------- ---------- Income from operations 127,024 36,151 ---------- ---------- Other income (expense): Interest income 28,155 25,882 Interest expense (26,240) (12,011) Proposed merger expenses (157,281) - Hurricane Georges assistance proceeds - 12,800 Miscellaneous income 9,109 600 ---------- ---------- (146,257) 27,271 ---------- ---------- Income (loss) before provision for income tax (19,233) 63,422 Provision for income tax - - ---------- ---------- Net income (loss) $ (19,233) $ 63,422 ========== ========== Basic and diluted income (loss) per common share $(0.01) $ 0.03 ========== ========== See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements. J-2
S-4262nd Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 262nd
MARGO CARIBE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY Three Months ended March 31, 2000 (Unaudited) [Enlarge/Download Table] Common Common Additional stock stock paid-in Retained Treasury shares amount capital earnings stock Total --------- ------ ---------- ---------- --------- ---------- Balance at December 31, 1999 1,875,322 $1,915 $4,637,706 $1,698,443 $(96,288) $6,241,776 Issuance of common stock from conversion of stock options 7,000 7 19,838 - - 19,845 Net income - - - (19,233) - (19,233) --------- ------ ---------- ---------- --------- ---------- Balance at March 31, 2000 1,882,322 $1,922 $4,657,544 $1,679,210 $(96,288) $6,242,388 ========= ====== ========== ========== ========= ========== See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements. J-3
S-4263rd Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 263rd
MARGO CARIBE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS Three Months Ended March 31, 2000 and 1999 (Unaudited) [Download Table] 2000 1999 ----------- ----------- Cash flows from operating activities: Net income (loss) $ (19,233) $ 63,422 Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities: Depreciation and amortization 111,203 109,210 Provision for uncollectible accounts receivable 6,000 6,000 Changes in assets and liabilities affecting cash flows from operating activities: Accounts receivable (355,518) 208,926 Inventories (11,826) (88,743) Prepaid expenses and other current assets (18,819) (13,287) Accounts payable (67,742) (126,473) Accrued expenses (15,836) (43,184) ----------- ----------- Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities (371,771) 115,871 ----------- ----------- Cash flows from investing activities: Additions to property and equipment (40,577) (44,512) ----------- ----------- Net cash used in investing activities (40,577) (44,512) ----------- ----------- Cash flows from financing activities: Repayment of long-term debt (50,043) (37,398) Issuance of common stock from conversion of stock options 19,845 - ----------- ----------- Net cash used in financing activities (30,198) (37,398) ----------- ----------- Net increase (decrease) in cash and equivalents (442,546) 33,961 Cash and equivalents at beginning of year 1,082,592 747,390 ----------- ----------- Cash and equivalents at end of period $ 640,046 $ 781,351 =========== =========== See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements. J-4
S-4264th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 264th
MARGO CARIBE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS March 31, 2000 (Unaudited) Note 1 - Basis of Presentation These interim consolidated financial statements include the financial statements of Margo Caribe, Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiaries (collectively "the Company"), Margo Nursery Farms, Inc., Margo Landscaping and Design, Inc., Margo Garden Products, Inc., Rain Forest Products Group, Inc. and Margo Development Corporation. These interim consolidated financial statements are unaudited, but include all adjustments that, in the opinion of management, are necessary for a fair statement of the Company's financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the periods covered. These statements have been prepared in accordance with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission's instructions to Form 10-Q, and therefore, do not include all information and footnotes necessary for a complete presentation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. The preparation of interim financial statements relies on estimates. Therefore, the results of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2000 are not necessarily indicative of the operating results to be expected for the year ending December 31, 2000. These statements should be read in conjunction with the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1999. On April 11, 2000, the Company executed an Agreement and Plan of Merger with iTract, LLC, a developmental stage internet company. To the extent the transactions contemplated in the agreement are consumated, the Company will cease being engaged in the current nursery and related businesses and would be engaged in providing internet based marketing services. Note 2 - Use of Estimates in the Preparation of Financial Statements The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of J-5
S-4265th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 265th
America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. The allowance for doubtful accounts is an amount that management believes will be adequate to absorb possible losses on existing accounts receivable that may become uncollectible based on evaluations of collectibility and prior credit experience. Because of uncertainties inherent in the estimation process, management's estimate of credit losses inherent in the existing accounts receivable and related allowance may change in the near term. Note 3 - Inventories At March 31, 2000 and December 31, 1999, inventories comprised the following: Description 2000 1999 --------------------------- ---------- ---------- Plant material $2,532,215 $2,417,102 Lawn and garden products 420,859 485,017 Raw materials and supplies 167,160 206,289 ---------- ---------- $3,120,234 $3,108,408 ========== ========== Note 4 - Notes Receivable The Company owns a note receivable with an outstanding principal balance of $996,962, from the sale of Cariplant S.A. (a former Dominican Republic subsidiary) to Altec International, C. por A. ("Altec"), another Dominican Republic company. The note is collateralized by the common stock and personal guarantee of the major shareholder of Cariplant. Since the inception of the note, the Company received various sporadic payments. On February 12, 1997, the Company obtained a junior lien on Cariplant's property and equipment and modified the repayment terms of the unpaid principal balance, with payments of principal and interest commencing in the year 2000. Altec is now in default with the modified repayment terms. As a result of the unfavorable collection experience, as well as the difficulties of operating in the Dominican Republic, the Company wrote down the carrying value of the note to $20,000. J-6
S-4266th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 266th
At March 31, 2000 and December 31, 1999, notes receivable included the following: Description 2000 1999 --------------------------------------- --------- --------- Note receivable from Altec $ 20,000 $ 20,000 8% mortgage note, collateralized by land in South Florida, with interest payments due monthly and principal due in a balloon payment on November 28, 2000 475,000 475,000 10% note, collateralized by real property 26,331 26,331 8% notes, due on demand, personally guaranteed by Company personnel 21,584 21,584 --------- --------- 542,915 542,915 Less current portion (475,000) (475,000) --------- --------- $ 67,915 $ 67,915 ========= ========= Note 5 - Property and Equipment At March 31, 2000 and December 31, 1999 property and equipment consisted of the following: Description 2000 1999 --------------------------------------- --------- --------- Leasehold improvements $ 1,289,318 $ 1,609,137 Equipment and fixtures 1,539,955 1,534,280 Transportation equipment 349,687 326,422 Real estate property 224,327 224,327 ----------- ----------- 3,403,287 3,694,166 Less accumulated depreciation and amortization (1,616,434) (1,791,303) ----------- ----------- $ 1,786,853 $ 1,902,863 =========== =========== J-7
S-4267th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 267th
Note 6 - Net Income (loss) per Common Share In 1997, the Company adopted Financial Accounting Standards Board Statement No. 128, Earnings Per Share ("SFAS 128"). SFAS 128 establishes standards for computing and presenting earnings per share ("EPS"). It replaces the presentation of primary EPS with basic EPS, and requires dual presentation of basic and diluted EPS on the face of the statement of operations. Basic EPS is computed by dividing income available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted EPS reflects the potential dilution that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised or converted into common stock. Basic and diluted income (loss) per common share at March 31, 2000 and 1999 were computed as follows: 2000 1999 ---------- ---------- Basic income (loss) per common share: Net income (loss) available to common shareholders $ (19,233) $ 63,422 ========== ========== Weighted average number of common shares outstanding 1,878,860 1,875,322 ========== ========== Basic income (loss) per common share $ (0.01) $ 0.03 ========== ========== Diluted income per common share: Net income (loss) available to common shareholders $ (19,233) $ 63,422 ========== ========== Weighted average number of common shares outstanding 1,878,860 1,875,322 Plus incremental shares from assumed conversions of stock options -- 142,000 ---------- ---------- Adjusted weighted average shares 1,878,860 2,017,322 ========== ========== Diluted income (loss) per common share $ (0.01) $ 0.03 ========== ========== For the three months ended March 31, 2000, the effect of the assumed exercise of stock options determined using the treasury J-8
S-4268th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 268th
stock method was antidilutive, thus no incremental shares were added to the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Note 7 - Segment Information In June 1997, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement No. 131, Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information ("SFAS 131"). SFAS 131 establishes standards for the way an enterprise reports information about operating segments in annual financial statements and requires that enterprises report selected information about operating segments in interim financial reports issued to shareholders. Operating segments are components of an enterprise about which separate financial information is available that is evaluated regularly by the chief operating decision maker in deciding how to allocate resources and in assessing performance. The Statement requires a reconciliation of total segment revenue and expense items and segment assets to the amounts in the enterprise's financial statements. SFAS 131 also requires a descriptive report on how the operating segments were determined, the products and services provided by the operating segments, and any measurement differences used for segment reporting and financial statement reporting. The Company's management monitors and manages the financial performance of three primary business segments: the production and distribution of plants, sales of lawn and garden products and landscaping services. The accounting policies of the segments are the same as those described in the summary of significant accounting policies. The Company evaluates performance based on net income or loss. The financial information presented below was derived from the internal management accounting system and are based on internal management accounting policies. The information presented does not necessarily represent each segments's financial condition and results of operations as if they were independent entities. J-9
S-4269th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 269th
The Company's segment information as of and for the three months ended March 31, 2000 and 1999, is as follows: [Enlarge/Download Table] 2000 -------------------------------------------------------------- Lawn & Garden Plants Products Landscaping Totals -------------------------------------------------------------- Revenues from external customers $ 1,051,448 $ 531,025 $ 525,083 $ 2,107,556 Intersegment revenues 62,273 8,847 -- 71,120 Interest income 28,155 -- -- 28,155 Interest expense 26,240 -- -- 26,240 Depreciation and amortization 90,312 7,128 13,763 111,203 Segment income (loss) (59,926) 27,852 12,841 (19,233) Segment assets 7,127,581 1,008,150 648,241 8,783,972 Expenditures for segment assets 40,577 -- -- 40,577 1999 -------------------------------------------------------------- Lawn & Garden Plants Products Landscaping Totals -------------------------------------------------------------- Revenues from external customers $ 881,968 $ 247,911 $ 403,185 $ 1,533,064 Intersegment revenues 58,607 34,064 -- 92,671 Interest income 25,882 -- -- 25,882 Interest expense 12,011 -- -- 12,011 Depreciation and amortization 87,355 7,539 14,316 109,210 Segment income (loss) 86,316 (25,441) 2,547 63,422 Segment assets 6,512,442 764,444 569,689 7,846,575 Expenditures for segment assets 44,512 -- -- 44,512 J-10
S-4270th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 270th
Note 8 - Supplemental Disclosures for the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows a) Non-cash investing activities During the three months ended March 31, 2000, the Company transferred unamortized leasehold improvements with a cost of $331,456 and a book value of $45,384 as an amount due from shareholder, in connection with a commitment made by the shareholder regarding the termination of a lease agreement of a 27 acre parcel of land previously leased to the Company. b) Other cash flow transactions Other cash flow transactions for the three months ended March 31, 2000 and 1999, include interest payments amounting to approximately $25,600 and $12,000, respectively. There were no income tax payments for the three months ended March 31, 2000 and 1999. J-11
S-4271st Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 271st
APPENDIX K iTRACT, LLC (A Development Stage Company) --------- FINANCIAL REPORT FOR THE PERIOD FROM MAY 12, 1999 (INCEPTION) TO JUNE 30, 1999 FOR THE PERIOD FROM JULY 1, 1999 TO DECEMBER 31, 1999 AND FOR THE PERIOD MAY 12, 1999 (INCEPTION) TO DECEMBER 31, 1999 ---------
S-4272nd Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 272nd
iTRACT, LLC (A Development Stage Company) INDEX TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS DECEMBER 31, 1999 PAGE ---- INDEPENDENT AUDITORS" REPORT K-1 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS: Balance Sheets K-3 Statements of Operations and Members' Deficit K-4 Statements of Cash Flows K-5 Notes to the Financial Statements K-6
S-4273rd Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 273rd
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT TO THE MEMBERS OF iTRACT, LLC We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of iTRACT, LLC (A Development Stage Company) as of December 31, 1999 and June 30, 1999 and the related statements of operations and members' deficit and cash flows for the six months ended December 31, 1999, for the period from May 12, 1999 (inception) to June 30, 1999 and for the period May 12, 1999 (inception) to December 31, 1999. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit. We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. K-1.
S-4274th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 274th
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of iTRACT, LLC at December 31, 1999 and June 30, 1999, and the results of its operations and members' deficit and its cash flows for the six months ended December 31, 1999, for the period from May 12, 1999 (inception) to June 30, 1999, and for the period May 12, 1999 (inception) to December 31, 1999, in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 2 to the financial statements, the company has suffered losses from operations and has net capital and working capital deficiencies that raise substantial doubt about the entity's ability to continue as a going concern. Management's plans in regards to these matters are also described in Note 2. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty. /s/ ANCHIN, BLOCK & ANCHIN LLP ANCHIN, BLOCK & ANCHIN LLP New York, New York March 16, 2000 K-2.
S-4275th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 275th
iTRACT LLC (A Development Stage Company) BALANCE SHEETS A S S E T S December 31, June 30, 1999 1999 ---- ---- CURRENT ASSETS: Cash $ 958 $ -- OTHER ASSETS: Web site development costs - Note 1 238,250 64,250 ---------- ---------- TOTAL ASSETS $ 239,208 $ 64,250 ========== ========== LIABILITIES AND MEMBERS' DEFICIT CURRENT LIABILITIES: Accounts payable and accrued expenses $ 25,177 $ 7,112 Due to affiliates - Note 3 708,333 288,238 ---------- ---------- Total Liabilities 733,510 295,350 MEMBERS' DEFICIT ACCUMULATED DURING THE DEVELOPMENT STAGE (494,302) (231,100) ---------- ---------- TOTAL LIABILITIES AND MEMBERS' DEFICIT $ 239,208 $ 64,250 ========== ========== See the accompanying Notes to the Financial Statements. K-3.
S-4276th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 276th
iTRACT LLC (A Development Stage Company) STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND MEMBERS' DEFICIT May 12, May 12, 1999 Six Months 1999 (Inception) to Ended (Inception) to December 31, December 31, June 30, 1999 1999 1999 ---- ---- ---- REVENUES $ -- $ -- $ -- WEB SITE DEVELOPMENT COSTS COSTS - NOTE 1 244,826 75,331 169,495 SELLING, GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES 249,476 187,871 61,605 ---------- ---------- ---------- NET LOSS 494,302 263,202 231,100 MEMBERS' DEFICIT: Beginning of period -- 231,100 -- ---------- ---------- ---------- End of period $ 494,302 $ 494,302 $ 231,100 ========== ========== ========== See the accompanying Notes to the Financial Statements. K-4.
S-4277th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 277th
iTRACT LLC (A Development Stage Company) STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS [Enlarge/Download Table] May 12, May 12, 1999 Six Months 1999 (Inception) to Ended (Inception) to December 31, December 31, June 30, 1999 1999 1999 ---- ---- ---- CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: Net loss $ (494,302) $ (263,202) $ (231,100) Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities: Increase in accounts payable and accrued expenses 25,177 18,065 7,112 ----------- ----------- ----------- Net Cash Used in Operating Activities (469,125) (245,137) (223,988) CASH FLOWS USED IN INVESTING ACTIVITIES: Web site development costs (238,250) (174,000) (64,250) CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: Advances from affiliates 708,333 420,095 288,238 ----------- ----------- ----------- NET INCREASE IN CASH 958 958 -- CASH: Beginning of period -- -- -- ----------- ----------- ----------- End of period $ 958 $ 958 $ -- =========== =========== =========== See the accompanying Notes to the Financial Statements. K-5.
S-4278th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 278th
iTRACT LLC (A Development Stage Company) NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS NOTE 1 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES: Organization and Business Plan: The company was organized in Delaware on May 12, 1999, as a limited liability company (LLC). The company is a member of a group of affiliated entities and has been in the development stage since its formation. The company is in the process of developing a website which will offer an all inclusive internet based directed marketing system that reaches the online and offline marketplaces simultaneously, which it plans to license to others. Subsequent to December 31, 1999 the company signed a nonbinding letter of intent to merge with a publicly traded company which intends to bring a minimum of $5,000,000 cash and cash equivalents (and no other assets) and liabilities not to exceed $10,000 into the merged entity. The principal shareholders of this public company have loaned an affiliate of the company $2,000,000 which is intended to help finance the company until the merger, when the loans are due. If the merger does not occur the loans are convertible into stock of the company's affiliate. Use of Estimates: The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Web Site Development Costs: Costs incurred to develop the company's web site have been capitalized or expensed based upon guidelines issued by the Emerging Issues Task Force Consensus issue No. 00-2. All costs incurred in the planning stage are expensed as incurred. Costs incurred in the web site application and infrastructure, graphics and content development stage are capitalized. Income Taxes: No provision is required for Federal and state taxes on the income of the company. Under the Internal Revenue Code and similar state regulations the company is treated as a partnership; accordingly, the income of the company is taxed to the members. K-6.
S-4279th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 279th
NOTE 2 - GOING CONCERN: The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the company will continue as a going concern. The company has suffered losses from operations, has a net capital deficiency and will require additional capital to continue operating. These factors raise substantial doubt about the entity's ability to continue as a going concern. Management believes the company will continue to have the financial support of its members and affiliates and is seeking additional sources of capital (see Note 1). NOTE 3 - RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS: The company has transactions with affiliates for various services performed as follows: [Download Table] May 12, 1999 Six Months May 12, 1999 (Inception) to Ended (Inception) to December 31, December 31, June 30, 1999 1999 1999 ---- ---- ---- Web site development (a) $413,000 $198,000 $215,000 Computer charges 27,200 20,400 6,800 Occupancy costs 42,972 30,848 12,124 Management and administrative fees 80,000 60,000 20,000 -------- -------- -------- $563,172 $309,248 $253,924 ======== ======== ======== <FN> (a) Certain of these costs have been capitalized (see note 1). </FN> K-7.
S-4280th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 280th
APPENDIX L iTRACT, LLC (A Development Stage Company) --------- FINANCIAL REPORT FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2000 AND FOR THE PERIOD MAY 12, 1999 (INCEPTION) TO MARCH 31, 2000 ---------
S-4281st Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 281st
iTRACT, LLC (A Development Stage Company) INDEX TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS MARCH 31, 2000 PAGE ---- FINANCIAL STATEMENTS: Balance Sheet L-1 Statements of Operations L-2 Statements of Members' Deficit L-3 Statements of Cash Flows L-4 Notes to the Financial Statements L-5
S-4282nd Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 282nd
iTRACT LLC (A Development Stage Company) BALANCE SHEET MARCH 31, 2000 (Unaudited) A S S E T S CURRENT ASSETS: Cash $ 7,523 Prepaid expenses and other current assets 7,973 Due from affiliate 1,000 ----------- Total Current Assets $ 16,496 OTHER ASSETS: Web site development costs - Note 1 370,520 ----------- TOTAL ASSETS $ 387,016 =========== LIABILITIES AND MEMBERS' DEFICIT CURRENT LIABILITIES: Accounts payable and accrued expenses $ 182,244 Due to affiliates - Note 3 1,003,103 ----------- Total Liabilities $ 1,185,347 MEMBERS' DEFICIT ACCUMULATED DURING THE DEVELOPMENT STAGE (798,331) ----------- TOTAL LIABILITIES AND MEMBERS' DEFICIT $ 387,016 =========== See the accompanying Notes to the Financial Statements. L-1.
S-4283rd Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 283rd
iTRACT LLC (A Development Stage Company) STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS May 12, 1999 Three Months (Inception) to Ended March 31, March 31, 2000 2000 ---- ---- (Unaudited) (Unaudited) REVENUES $ -- $ -- WEB SITE DEVELOPMENT COSTS - NOTE 1 (296,767) (51,941) SELLING, GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES - NOTE 4 (1,048,089) (798,613) ------------ ---------- NET LOSS $ (1,344,856) $ (850,554) ============ ========== See the accompanying Notes to the Financial Statements. L-2.
S-4284th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 284th
iTRACT LLC (A Development Stage Company) STATEMENTS OF MEMBERS' DEFICIT May 12, 1999 Three Months (Inception) to Ended March 31, March 31, 2000 2000 ---- ---- (Unaudited) (Unaudited) MEMBERS' DEFICIT: Beginning of period $ -- $ (494,302) Net loss (1,344,856) (850,554) Capital contributions 546,525 546,525 ------------ ---------- End of period $ (798,331) $ (798,331) ============ ========== See the accompanying Notes to the Financial Statements. L-3.
S-4285th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 285th
iTRACT LLC (A Development Stage Company) STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS [Enlarge/Download Table] May 12, 1999 Three Months (Inception) to Ended March 31, March 31, 2000 2000 ---- ---- (Unaudited) (Unaudited) CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: Net loss $ (1,344,856) $ (850,554) Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities: Increase in members' equity in exchange for general and administrative expenses incurred 546,525 546,525 Increase in prepaid and other current assets (7,973) (7,973) Increase in accounts payable and accrued expenses 182,244 157,067 ------------ ---------- Net Cash Used in Operating Activities (624,060) (154,935) ------------ ---------- CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: Web site development costs capitalized (370,520) (132,270) Advances to affiliate (1,000) (1,000) ------------ ---------- Net Cash Used in Investing Activities (371,520) (133,270) ------------ ---------- CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: Advances from affiliates 1,003,103 294,770 ------------ ---------- NET INCREASE IN CASH 7,523 6,565 CASH: Beginning of period -- 958 ------------ ---------- End of period $ 7,523 $ 7,523 ============ ========== See the accompanying Notes to the Financial Statements. L-4.
S-4286th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 286th
iTRACT LLC (A Development Stage Company) NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS NOTE 1 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES: Interim Financial Statements: The financial information included herein is unaudited; however, the information reflects all adjustments (consisting solely of normal recurring adjustments) that, in the opinion of management, are necessary to a fair presentation of the financial position, results of operations, and cash flows for the interim periods. Organization and Business Plan: The company was organized in Delaware on May 12, 1999, as a limited liability company (LLC). The company is a member of a group of affiliated entities and has been in the development stage since its formation. The company is in the process of developing a website which will offer an all inclusive internet based directed marketing system that reaches the online and offline marketplaces simultaneously, which it plans to license to others. Subsequent to March 31, 2000 the company signed an agreement and plan of merger to merge with a subsidiary of a publicly traded company which intends to bring a minimum of $5,000,000 cash and cash equivalents (and no other assets) and liabilities not to exceed $10,000 into the merged entity. The principal shareholders of this public company have loaned an affiliate of the company $2,000,000 which is intended to help finance the company until the merger, when the loans are due. If the merger does not occur the loans are convertible into stock of the company's affiliate. Additionally, the company and its affiliate may be liable for up to $100,000 for reimbursement of merger expenses incurred. Use of Estimates: The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Web Site Development Costs: Costs incurred to develop the company's web site have been capitalized or expensed based upon guidelines issued by the Emerging Issues Task Force Consensus issue No. 00-2. All costs incurred in the planning stage are expensed as incurred. Costs incurred in the web site application and infrastructure, graphics and content development stage are capitalized. L-5.
S-4287th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 287th
NOTE 1 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED): Income Taxes: No provision is required for federal and state taxes on the income of the company. Under the Internal Revenue Code and similar state regulations the company is treated as a partnership; accordingly, the income of the company is taxed to the members. NOTE 2 - GOING CONCERN: The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the company will continue as a going concern. The company has suffered losses from operations, has net capital and working capital deficiencies and will require additional capital to continue operating. These factors raise substantial doubt about the entity"s ability to continue as a going concern. Management believes the company will continue to have the financial support of its members and affiliates and is seeking additional sources of capital (see Note 1). NOTE 3 - RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS: The company has transactions with affiliates for various services performed as follows: May 12, 1999 Three Months (Inception) to Ended March 31, March 31, 2000 2000 (Unaudited) (Unaudited) ----------- ----------- Web site development (a) $485,000 $ 72,000 Computer charges 42,200 15,300 Occupancy costs 60,337 17,365 Management and administrative fees 110,000 30,000 -------- -------- $697,837 $134,665 ======== ======== (a) Certain of these costs have been capitalized (see Note 1). In conjunction with the agreement and plan of merger, (see Note 1) several affiliates of the company are required to contribute a minimum of approximately $384,000 of amounts due them, to the capital of the company. L-6.
S-4288th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 288th
NOTE 4 - EQUITY BASED COMPENSATION: During the three months ended March 31, 2000, the company issued additional equity in exchange for general and administrative expenses incurred as follows: Recipient Fair Value --------- ---------- Parent company (owned by officer of company) $ 261,750 Employees 25,125 Employees of affiliate 108,750 Consultants 150,900 ---------- $ 546,525 ========== NOTE 5 - COMMITIMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES: Employment Contract: On January 1, 2000 the company entered into a three-year employment agreement with its Executive Vice President whereby he will receive a salary of $120,000, $150,000 and $200,000 for the first, second and third years respectively, plus an additional bonus based on the attainment of performance objectives. Advertising and Promotion Agreements: On April 3, 2000 the company entered into a two-year agreement with an internet company to have it post the company's advertising and promotional placements on the internet company's web sites. Based upon certain performance requirements by the internet company, the company may be liable for up to $83,333 per month (with a maximum of $2,000,000) should the merger described in to Note 1 not take place by August 15, 2000. If the merger occurs, these obligations will be satisfied by the issuance of warrants to purchase up to 3.52% of the company for $4,530. In April 2000, the company entered into separate one-year agreements with an advertising agency and a public relations firm requiring monthly fees of $43,041 and $12,000, respectively. L-7.
S-4289th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 289th
PART II INFORMATION REQUIRED IN THE REGISTRATION STATEMENT Item 20. Indemnification of Directors and Officers. A. Section 102(b)(7) of the Delaware General Corporation Law (the "DGCL") provides that a corporation may include in its certificate of incorporation a provision eliminating or limiting the personal liability of directors to the corporation or its stockholders for monetary damages for breach of a director's fiduciary duty. However, no such provision may eliminate or limit the liability of a director for breaching his duty of loyalty, failing to act in good faith, engaging in intentional misconduct or knowingly violating a law, paying a dividend or approving a stock repurchase which was illegal, or obtaining an improper personal benefit. A provision of this type has no effect on the availability of equitable remedies, such as injunction or rescission, for breach of fiduciary duty. Article V of iTract, Inc.'s Certificate of Incorporation contains such a provision. B. Section 145 of the DGCL authorizes Delaware corporations to indemnify their officers and directors against liabilities arising out of pending or threatened actions, suits or proceedings to which they are or may be made parties by reason of being directors or officers. Such rights of indemnification are not exclusive of any other rights to which such officers or directors may be entitled under any by-law, agreement, vote of stockholders or otherwise. The Certificate of Incorporation of iTract, Inc. provides that iTract, Inc. shall indemnify its directors, officers and employees to the full extent permitted by law. iTract, Inc. also maintains directors' and officers' liability insurance on behalf of its directors and officers. C. Section 13(a) of Article III of the iTract, Inc.'s By-laws (the "By-laws") provides that iTract, Inc. shall indemnify any person who was or is a party or is threatened to be made a party to any threatened, pending or completed action, suit or proceeding, whether civil, criminal, administrative or investigative (other than an action by or in the right of iTract, Inc.) by reason of the fact that he is or was a director, officer, employee or agent of iTract, Inc. or is or was serving at the request of iTract, Inc. as a director, officer, employee or agent of another corporation or enterprise, against expenses (including attorneys' fees), judgments, fines and amounts paid in settlement actually and reasonably incurred by him in connection with such action, suit or proceeding if he acted in good faith and in a manner he reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to the best interests of iTract, Inc., and, with respect to any criminal action or proceeding, had no reasonable cause to believe his conduct was unlawful. Section 13(b) of Article III of the By-laws provides that iTract, Inc. shall indemnify any person who was or is a party or is threatened to be made a party to any threatened, pending or completed action or suit by or in the right of iTract, Inc. to procure a judgment in its favor by reason of the fact that such person acted in any of the capacities set forth above, against expenses (including attorneys' fees) actually and reasonably incurred by him in connection with the defense or settlement of such action or suit if he acted under similar standards set forth in the preceding paragraph, except that no indemnification may be made in respect of any claim, issue or matter as to which such person shall have been adjudged to be liable to iTract, Inc. unless and only to the extent that the court in which such action or suit was brought shall determine that despite the adjudication of liability, such person is fairly and reasonably entitled to be indemnified for such expenses which the court shall deem proper. Section 13(c) of Article III of the By-laws provides that to the extent a director or officer of iTract, Inc. has been successful on the merits or otherwise in the defense of any action, suit or proceeding referred to in Sections 13(a) and 13(b) of Article III of the By-laws or in the defense of any claim, issue, or matter therein, such person shall be indemnified against expenses (including attorneys' fees) actually and reasonably incurred by such person in connection therewith. Section 13(e) of Article III of the By-laws provides that iTract, Inc. may pay expenses incurred in defending a civil or criminal action, suit or proceeding in advance of the final disposition of such action, suit or proceeding if it receives an undertaking by or on behalf of such director or officer to repay such amounts if it is ultimately determined that such person is not entitled to be indemnified by iTract, Inc. as authorized in Section 13 of Article III of the By-laws. Sections 13(f) and 13(g) of Article III of the By-laws provide that indemnification provided for by Section 13 of Article III of the By-laws shall not be deemed exclusive of any other rights to which the indemnified party may be entitled; and that iTract, Inc. may purchase and maintain insurance on behalf of a director or officer of II-1
S-4290th Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 290th
iTract, Inc. against any liability asserted against such person or incurred by such person in any such capacity or arising out of such person's status as such, whether or not iTract, Inc. would have the power to indemnify such person against such liabilities under such liabilities under the provisions of Section 13 of Article III of the By-laws. D. Section 9.11 of the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated April 11, 2000, among Margo Caribe, Inc., iTract Acquisition Company, LLC, iTract, Inc., itract, LLC and International Commerce Exchange Systems, Inc., provides that iTract, Inc. shall indemnify and hold harmless each present and former officer and director of iTract, Inc. prior to the effective time of the merger with itract, LLC against any claims, losses, liabilities, damages, costs and expenses incurred in connection with any claim, action, suit, proceeding or investigation arising out of or pertaining to matters existing or occurring at or prior to the effective time of the merger with itract, LLC, whether asserted or claimed at or prior to said effective time, to the fullest extent permitted under the Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws of iTract, Inc. as in effect immediately prior to the merger of Margo with and into iTract, Inc. Item 21. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules. 2.1 Merger Agreement, dated June 21, 2000, between Margo Caribe, Inc. and iTract, Inc. (Attached to the proxy statement/prospectus constituting a part of this Registration Statement as Appendix A.) 2.2 Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of April 11, 2000, among Margo Caribe, Inc., iTract Acquisition Company, LLC, iTract, Inc., itract, LLC and International Commerce Exchange Systems, Inc. (Attached to the proxy statement/prospectus constituting a part of this Registration Statement as Appendix B.) 3.1 Certificate of Incorporation of iTract, Inc. (Attached to the proxy statement/prospectus constituting a part of this Registration Statement as Appendix G.) 3.2 Bylaws of iTract, Inc. (Attached to the proxy statement/prospectus constituting a part of this Registration Statement as Appendix H.) 4.1 Stock Option Plan. 5.1 Opinion regarding legality and consent of Shutts & Bowen LLP.* 8.1 Opinion of Pietrantoni Mendez & Alvarez LLP regarding material Puerto Rico and Federal income tax consequences relating to reincorporation merger.* 8.2 Opinion of Kronish Lieb Weiner & Hellman LLP regarding material Federal income tax consequences relating to the itract merger.* 10.1 Agreement for Participation in Internet Loyalty Program, dated April 10, 2000, between itract, LLC and FreeRide.com LLC. 23.1 Consent of Shutts & Bowen LLP.* 23.2 Consent of Pietrantoni Mendez & Alvarez LLP.* 23.3 Consent of Kronish Lieb Weiner & Hellman LLP.* 23.4 Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP. 23.5 Consent of Anchin, Block & Anchin LLP. 23.6 Consent of Schwartz Heslin Group, Inc. 23.7 Consent of San Juan Holdings, Inc. 24.1 Power of Attorney (included on page II-4). 99.1 Form of Margo Proxy Card.* -------------------- * To be filed by a Pre-Effective Amendment to the Registration Statement. II-2
S-4291st Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 291st
Item 22. Undertakings. The undersigned registrant hereby undertakes: 1. To file, during any period in which offers or sales are being made, a post-effective amendment to this registration statement: (i) To include any prospectus required by section 10(a)(3) of the Securities Act of 1933; (ii) To reflect in the prospectus any facts or events arising after the effective date of the registration statement (or the most recent post-effective amendment thereof) which, individually or in the aggregate, represent a fundamental change in the information set forth in the registration statement. Notwithstanding the foregoing, any increase or decrease in volume of securities offered (if the total dollar value of securities offered would not exceed that which was registered) and any deviation from the low or high end of the estimated maximum offering range may be reflected in the form of prospectus filed with the Commission pursuant to Rule 424(b) if, in the aggregate, the changes in volume and price represent no more than a 20 percent change in the maximum aggregate offering price set forth in the "Calculation of Registration Fee" table in the effective registration statement; (iii) To include any material information with respect to the plan of distribution not previously disclosed in the registration statement or any material change to such information in the registration statement; 2. That, for the purpose of determining any liability under the Securities Act of 1933, each such post-effective amendment shall be deemed to be a new registration statement relating to the securities offered therein, and the offering of such securities at that time shall be deemed to be the initial bona fide offering thereof. 3. To remove from registration by means of a post-effective amendment any of the securities being registered which remain unsold at the termination of the offering. 4. That prior to any public reoffering of the securities registered hereunder through use of a prospectus which is a part of this registration statement, by any person or party who is deemed to be an underwriter within the meaning of Rule 145(c), such reoffering prospectus will contain the information called for by the applicable registration form with respect to reofferings by persons who may be deemed underwriters, in addition to the information called for by the other items of the applicable form. 5. That every prospectus (i) that is filed pursuant to paragraph (4) immediately preceding, or (ii) that purports to meet the requirements of Section 10(a)(3) of the Securities Act of 1933 and is used in connection with an offering of securities subject to Rule 415, will be filed as a part of an amendment to the registration statement and will not be used until such amendment is effective, and that, for purposes of determining any liability under the Securities Act of 1933, each such post-effective amendment shall be deemed to be a new registration statement relating to the securities offered therein, and the offering of such securities at that time shall be deemed to be the initial bona fide offering thereof. 6. To supply by means of a post-effective amendment all information concerning a transaction, and the company being acquired involved therein, that was not the subject of and included in the registration statement when it became effective. Insofar as indemnification for liabilities under the Securities Act of 1933 may be permitted to directors, officers and controlling persons of the registrant pursuant to the foregoing provisions, or otherwise, the registrant has been advised that in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange Commission such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Act and is, therefore, unenforceable. In the event that a claim for indemnification against such liabilities (other than the payment by the registrant of expenses incurred or paid by a director, officer or controlling person of the registrant in the successful defense of any action, suit or proceeding) is asserted by such director, officer or controlling person in connection with the securities being registered, the registrant will, unless in the opinion of its counsel the matter has been settled by controlling precedent, submit to a court of appropriate jurisdiction the question whether such indemnification by it is against public policy as expressed in the Act and will be governed by the final adjudication of such issue. II-3
S-4292nd Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 292nd
SIGNATURES Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, the registrant has duly caused this Registration Statement to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in the Municipality of San Juan, Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, on the 30th day of June, 2000. ITRACT, INC. By: /S/ MICHAEL J. SPECTOR -------------------------------- Michael J. Spector Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer POWER OF ATTORNEY Each person whose signature appears below hereby constitutes and appoints Michael J. Spector and Margaret D. Spector and each of them, each with full power to act without the other, his true and lawful attorneys-in-fact and agents, each with full power of substitution and resubstitution, for him and in his name, place and stead in any and all capacities, to sign any and all amendments (including post-effective amendments) to this Registration Statement, and any registration statement relating to the same offering as this Registration Statement that is to be effective upon filing pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act of 1933, and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto each of said attorneys-in-fact and agents full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in and about the premises, as fully to all intents and purposes as he might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that each of said attorneys-in-fact and agents, or his substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof. Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, this Registration Statement has been signed by the following persons in the capacities and on the dates indicated: Signature Title Date --------- ----- ---- /s/Michael J. Spector Chairman of the Board, President, June 30, 2000 ----------------------- Chief Executive Officer and Michael J. Spector Director /s/Margaret D. Spector Secretary and Director June 30, 2000 ----------------------- Margaret D. Spector /s/Blas R. Ferraiuoli Director June 30, 2000 ----------------------- Blas R. Ferraiuoli /s/ Frederick D. Moss Director June 30, 2000 ----------------------- Frederick D. Moss /s/Michael A. Rubin Director June 30, 2000 ----------------------- Michael A. Rubin /s/ Alfonso A. Ortega Vice President, Treasurer and June 30, 2000 ----------------------- Principal Financial Officer and Alfonso A. Ortega Accounting Officer II-4
S-4Last Page of 293TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 293rd
INDEX TO EXHIBITS Exhibit Number Description ------ ----------- 2.1 - Merger Agreement, dated June 21, 2000, between Margo Caribe, Inc. and iTract, Inc. (Attached to the proxy statement/prospectus constituting a part of this Registration Statement as Appendix A.) 2.2 - Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of April 11, 2000, among Margo Caribe, Inc., iTract Acquisition Company, LLC, iTract, Inc., itract, LLC and International Commerce Exchange Systems, Inc. (Attached to the proxy statement/prospectus constituting a part of this Registration Statement as Appendix B.) 3.1 - Certificate of Incorporation of iTract, Inc. (Attached to the proxy statement/prospectus constituting a part of this Registration Statement as Appendix G.) 3.2 - Bylaws of iTract, Inc. (Attached to the proxy statement/prospectus constituting a part of this Registration Statement as Appendix H.) 4.1 - Stock Option Plan. 5.1 - Opinion regarding legality and consent of Shutts & Bowen LLP.* 8.1 - Opinion of Pietrantoni Mendez & Alvarez LLP regarding material Puerto Rico and Federal income tax consequences relating to reincorporation merger.* 8.2 - Opinion of Kronish Lieb Weiner & Hellman LLP regarding material Federal income tax consequences relating to the itract merger.* 10.1 - Agreement for Participation in Internet Loyalty Program, dated April 10, 2000, between itract, LLC and FreeRide.com LLC. 23.1 - Consent of Shutts & Bowen LLP.* 23.2 - Consent of Pietrantoni Mendez & Alvarez LLP.* 23.3 - Consent of Kronish Lieb Weiner & Hellman LLP.* 23.4 - Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP. 23.5 - Consent of Anchin, Block & Anchin LLP. 23.6 - Consent of Schwartz Heslin Group, Inc. 23.7 - Consent of San Juan Holdings, Inc. 24.1 - Power of Attorney (included on page II-4). 99.1 - Form of Margo Proxy Card.* -------------------- * To be filed by a Pre-Effective Amendment to the Registration Statement.

Dates Referenced Herein   and   Documents Incorporated by Reference

Referenced-On Page
This ‘S-4’ Filing    Date First  Last      Other Filings
5/17/09102None on these Dates
12/31/0787247
6/30/012181
3/1/0187248
12/31/00264
11/28/00241
10/15/0097177
8/15/0052288
Filed on:7/3/001
6/30/005292
6/28/00288
6/21/005293
6/15/0061101
6/6/009499
6/1/0032
5/31/0095186
5/15/0083
5/14/0085
4/18/00122137
4/16/00246
4/14/00257
4/11/0036293
4/10/00290293
4/5/001258
4/4/003638
4/3/00288
3/31/009288
3/24/0082
3/17/0037184
3/16/00274
3/9/0036
3/8/0037
3/3/00229
2/29/0037148
2/24/0080103
2/10/003638
2/9/0038256
2/8/003699
2/7/0036
2/1/0087248
1/31/0036
1/27/0035
1/19/0035
1/18/0035
1/15/0078
1/1/0078288
12/31/999278
12/30/9935
8/31/99246
7/1/999271
6/30/999274
5/17/9931
5/12/999287
3/31/9984270
3/24/9987249
12/31/9830258
9/30/9891
9/23/9891240
9/21/9889244
6/1/98234
4/23/98102
1/1/9886248
12/31/9730258
11/28/9783253
9/30/9783253
8/15/9783253
2/12/9791265
1/1/9787248
12/31/96252
8/20/9686
5/29/96102
12/31/95131154
12/1/9586237
10/13/9586
3/31/95131
2/9/9532
12/30/9433
1/1/9487248
1/1/9386247
 List all Filings 
Top
Filing Submission 0000950170-00-001115   –   Alternative Formats (Word / Rich Text, HTML, Plain Text, et al.)

Copyright © 2024 Fran Finnegan & Company LLC – All Rights Reserved.
AboutPrivacyRedactionsHelp — Fri., Apr. 26, 6:08:20.3pm ET