SEC Info  
    Home      Search      My Interests      Help      Sign In      Please Sign In

Netgear, Inc – ‘S-1/A’ on 3/12/04

On:  Friday, 3/12/04, at 10:00pm ET   ·   As of:  3/15/04   ·   Accession #:  891618-4-711   ·   File #:  333-113354

Previous ‘S-1’:  ‘S-1’ on 3/5/04   ·   Latest ‘S-1’:  This Filing

Find Words in Filings emoji
 
  in    Show  and   Hints

  As Of                Filer                Filing    For·On·As Docs:Size              Issuer               Agent

 3/15/04  Netgear, Inc                      S-1/A       3/12/04    2:1.2M                                   Bowne - Palo Alto/FA

Pre-Effective Amendment to Registration Statement (General Form)   —   Form S-1
Filing Table of Contents

Document/Exhibit                   Description                      Pages   Size 

 1: S-1/A       Amendment No. 1 to Form S-1                         HTML   1.21M 
 2: EX-23.1     Consent of Experts or Counsel                          1      4K 


S-1/A   —   Amendment No. 1 to Form S-1
Document Table of Contents

Page (sequential) | (alphabetic) Top
 
11st Page   -   Filing Submission
"Table of Contents
"The Offering
"Prospectus Summary
"Risk Factors
"Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
"Use of Proceeds
"Market Price of Common Stock
"Dividend Policy
"Capitalization
"Selected Consolidated Financial Data
"Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
"Business
"Management
"Certain Relationships and Related Transactions
"Principal and Selling Stockholders
"Description of Capital Stock
"United States Federal Income Tax Consequences to Non-United States Holders
"Shares Eligible for Future Sale
"Underwriting
"Notice to Canadian Residents
"Legal Matters
"Experts
"Where You Can Find Additional Information
"Index to Consolidated Financial Statements
"Signatures
"Exhibit Index

This is an HTML Document rendered as filed.  [ Alternative Formats ]



  sv1za  

Table of Contents

As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 12, 2004
Registration No. 333-113354


SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549


AMENDMENT NO. 1 to

FORM S-1
REGISTRATION STATEMENT
UNDER
THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933


NETGEAR, Inc.

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)


         
Delaware   3577   77-0419172
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
  (Primary Standard Industrial
Classification Code Number)
  (I.R.S. Employer
Identification Number)

NETGEAR, Inc.

4500 Great America Parkway
Santa Clara, California 95054
(408) 907-8000
(Address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of Registrant’s principal executive offices)


Patrick C.S. Lo

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
NETGEAR, Inc.
4500 Great America Parkway
Santa Clara, California 95054
(408) 907-8000
(Name, address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of agent for service)


Copies to:

     
John T. Sheridan, Esq.
John B. Turner, Esq.
Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, P.C.
650 Page Mill Road
Palo Alto, California 94304-1050
(650) 493-9300
  Patrick A. Pohlen, Esq.
Laura I. Bushnell, Esq.
Latham & Watkins LLP
135 Commonwealth Drive
Menlo Park, California 94025
(650) 328-4600


     Approximate date of commencement of proposed sale to the public: As soon as practicable after the effective date of this Registration Statement.

     If any of the securities being registered on this Form are to be offered on a delayed or continuous basis pursuant to Rule 415 under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), check the following box.    o
     If this Form is filed to register additional securities for an offering pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act, please check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering.    o
     If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(c) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering.    o
     If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(d) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering.    o
     If delivery of the prospectus is expected to be made pursuant to Rule 434, please check the following box.    o



     The Registrant hereby amends this Registration Statement on such date or dates as may be necessary to delay its effective date until the Registrant shall file a further amendment which specifically states that this Registration Statement shall thereafter become effective in accordance with Section 8(a) of the Securities Act or until the Registration Statement shall become effective on such date as the Securities and Exchange Commission, acting pursuant to said Section 8(a), may determine.





Table of Contents

The information in this prospectus is not complete and may be changed. We may not sell these securities until the registration statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission is effective. This prospectus is not an offer to sell these securities and it is not soliciting an offer to buy these securities in any jurisdiction where the offer or sale is not permitted.

Subject to Completion, dated March 12, 2004

PROSPECTUS

9,000,000 Shares

NETGEAR LOGO

Common Stock


The selling stockholders named in this prospectus are selling 9,000,000 shares of our common stock. We will not receive any of the proceeds from the sale of shares by the selling stockholders.

Our shares are quoted on the Nasdaq National Market under the symbol “NTGR.” On March 12, 2004, the last sale price of our common stock as reported on the Nasdaq National Market was $14.94 per share.

Investing in our common stock involves risks. See “Risk Factors” beginning on page 5.

                 
Share Total


Public offering price
  $       $    
Underwriting discount
  $       $    
Proceeds to the selling stockholders (before expenses)
  $       $    

The selling stockholders have granted the underwriters a 30-day option to purchase up to an aggregate of 1,350,000 additional shares of common stock on the same terms as set forth above to cover over-allotments, if any.

Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state securities commission has approved or disapproved of these securities or determined if this prospectus is truthful or complete. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.

Lehman Brothers, on behalf of the underwriters, expects to deliver the shares on or about                     , 2004.


LEHMAN BROTHERS
  GOLDMAN, SACHS & CO.
  NEEDHAM & COMPANY, INC.
  PACIFIC GROWTH EQUITIES, LLC
  JMP SECURITIES
  HARRIS NESBITT GERARD

                        , 2004



Table of Contents

[NETGEAR logo with the caption: “Small Business Networking, Ethernet Switches, Secure Virtual Private Network Firewalls, Business Wireless Local Area Network” and photographs of four small business networking products. the caption: “home networking, shared broadband internet access, telecommuting, home wireless local area network” follows, accompanied by photographs of four home networking products.]



TABLE OF CONTENTS

PROSPECTUS SUMMARY
The Offering
RISK FACTORS
SPECIAL NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
USE OF PROCEEDS
MARKET PRICE OF COMMON STOCK
DIVIDEND POLICY
CAPITALIZATION
SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
BUSINESS
MANAGEMENT
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
PRINCIPAL AND SELLING STOCKHOLDERS
DESCRIPTION OF CAPITAL STOCK
UNITED STATES FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSEQUENCES TO NON-UNITED STATES HOLDERS
SHARES ELIGIBLE FOR FUTURE SALE
UNDERWRITING
NOTICE TO CANADIAN RESIDENTS
LEGAL MATTERS
EXPERTS
WHERE YOU CAN FIND ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
SIGNATURES
EXHIBIT INDEX
EXHIBIT 23.1


Table of Contents

TABLE OF CONTENTS

         
Page

Prospectus Summary
    1  
The Offering
    3  
Risk Factors
    5  
Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
    15  
Use of Proceeds
    16  
Market Price of Common Stock
    16  
Dividend Policy
    16  
Capitalization
    17  
Selected Consolidated Financial Data
    18  
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
    20  
Business
    38  
Management
    50  
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions
    60  
Principal and Selling Stockholders
    64  
Description of Capital Stock
    67  
United States Federal Income Tax Consequences to Non-United States Holders
    70  
Shares Eligible for Future Sale
    72  
Underwriting
    74  
Notice to Canadian Residents
    78  
Legal Matters
    80  
Experts
    80  
Where You Can Find Additional Information
    81  
Index to Consolidated Financial Statements
    F-1  


      You should rely only on the information contained in this prospectus. We have not authorized anyone to provide you with information that is different from that contained in this prospectus. This prospectus is not an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy shares in any jurisdiction where such offer or any sale of shares would be unlawful. The information in this prospectus is complete and accurate only as of the date on the front cover regardless of the time of delivery of this prospectus or of any sale of shares.



Table of Contents

(This page intentionally left blank)

 


Table of Contents

PROSPECTUS SUMMARY

      This summary highlights information contained elsewhere in this prospectus and does not contain all of the information you should consider in making your investment decision. You should read this summary together with the more detailed information, including our financial statements and related notes, elsewhere in this prospectus.

NETGEAR, Inc.

      We design, develop and market technologically advanced, branded networking products that address the specific needs of small business and home users. We supply networking products that meet the ease-of-use, quality, reliability, performance and affordability requirements of these users. Our suite of approximately 100 products enables users to share Internet access, peripherals, files, digital multimedia content and applications among multiple personal computers and other Internet-enabled devices.

      Since our inception in 1996, we have been focused solely on the networking needs of the small business, which we define as businesses with fewer than 250 employees, and home markets, and we have shipped over 22 million units. As a result of our brand name, the implementation of our operating strategy and the growth in demand for networking products within small businesses and homes, we have achieved net revenue growth in each year since our inception, reaching $299.3 million in net revenue for 2003. In 2003, we had net income of $13.1 million. We have operated at a net loss for two of the last five years and our accumulated deficit as of December 31, 2003, was $25.3 million. Continued growth and profitability of our business will depend on many factors, including growth in demand for networking products by small business and home users.

      Our net revenue is balanced worldwide, with 58% of our 2003 net revenue derived from sales in North America and 42% derived from international sales. Our global sales channel network includes traditional retailers with over 3,700 retail locations in North America, including Best Buy, CompUSA and Staples, and over 3,300 international retail locations such as PC World in the United Kingdom and MediaMarkt in Germany and Austria, as well as online retailers such as Amazon.com and Buy.com. In addition, we sell our products both in North America and internationally through direct market resellers such as CDW Corporation, and thousands of value added resellers. We are also increasingly selling our products through broadband service providers such as Time-Warner Cable and Comcast Cable Communications. In 2003, sales to our largest distributors, Ingram Micro, Inc. and Tech Data Corporation, and their affiliates, accounted for approximately 46% of our net revenue.

      A number of factors are driving increased demand for networking products within small businesses and homes, including the need to share information, broadband Internet access and resources among multiple users and devices. Users are also demanding the convenience and flexibility of wireless networking and are increasingly focused on the security of their network connections. Our networking products for the small business and home markets are classified into the following three categories:

      Ethernet networking products, including switches (multiple port devices used to network personal computers and peripherals); network interface cards, or network adapters, and bridges (devices that connect personal computers and other equipment to a network); and peripheral servers such as print servers (devices that manage printing on a network).

      Broadband products, including routers (intelligent devices used to connect two networks together, such as a local area network and the Internet), gateways (a router with an integrated modem for Internet access), and products that include an integrated wireless access point such as a wireless gateway.

      Wireless networking products, including access points (devices that provide a wireless link between the wired network and wireless devices), wireless network interface cards, or network adapters, and media adapters and bridges (devices that wirelessly connect personal computers, stereos, TVs and other equipment to a network).

1



Table of Contents

      We believe that our products meet the specific needs of small business and home users and that we have the following competitive strengths:

  •  Reliable, easy-to-use, affordable products. Our networking products are easy to install, use and maintain, and satisfy the budgetary requirements of small business and home users.
 
  •  Broad product offering. We offer a broad range of networking products for small business and home users for use in a variety of networking environments, including traditional Ethernet cabling and wireless.
 
  •  Global channel presence. We sell our products in North America, Europe, Middle-East, and Africa, or EMEA, and Asia Pacific through an extensive sales channel network, which includes traditional retailers, online retailers, direct market resellers, value added resellers and broadband service providers.
 
  •  History of product innovation. We have a history of introducing new technologies to the small business and home markets. We believe our experience, market presence and global reach enable us to identify trends in product demand and rapidly introduce products to meet that demand.
 
  •  Operational discipline. We work closely with our component vendors as well as our design and manufacturing partners in China and Taiwan to bring products to market quickly, minimize product costs and ensure product quality. In addition, we maintain operational discipline over product development and supply chain and channel inventory management.

      Our suite of products is designed specifically to meet the needs of the small business and home markets, including tailored component specifications, physical characteristics, and hardware and software features.

Corporate Information

      We were incorporated in Delaware on January 8, 1996. Our principal executive offices are located at 4500 Great America Parkway, Santa Clara, California 95054, and our telephone number is (408) 907-8000. We maintain a web site at www.NETGEAR.com. The reference to our web address does not constitute incorporation by reference of the information contained at this site.

      NETGEAR is a registered trademark of ours. Other trademarks and trade names appearing in this prospectus are the property of their respective holders. In this prospectus, the “company,” “NETGEAR,” “we,” “us” and “our” refer to NETGEAR, Inc., a Delaware corporation, and its consolidated subsidiaries.

2



Table of Contents

The Offering

 
Common stock offered by the selling stockholders 9,000,000 shares
 
Common stock to be outstanding after this offering 29,654,777 shares
 
Nasdaq National Market symbol
NTGR
 
Use of proceeds We will not receive any of the proceeds from this offering.

      The number of shares of common stock that will be outstanding after this offering is based on the number of shares of common stock outstanding on February 20, 2004, and excludes:

  •  5,301,622 shares of common stock subject to stock options outstanding as of February 20, 2004, with a weighted average exercise price of $5.98 per share;
 
  •  1,305,674 shares of common stock available for future grant or issuance under our stock plan as of February 20, 2004; and
 
  •  500,000 shares of common stock available for future grant or issuance under our employee stock purchase plan as of February 20, 2004.

      As of February 20, 2004, the selling stockholders held 59.9% of our outstanding common stock. After giving effect to this offering and assuming no exercise of the underwriters’ over-allotment option, the selling stockholders will own approximately 29.5% of our outstanding common stock.

      Unless otherwise indicated, all information in this prospectus assumes that the underwriters do not exercise the over-allotment option that the selling stockholders have granted them to purchase additional shares in this offering, as described in the “Underwriting” section of this prospectus.

3



Table of Contents

Summary Consolidated Financial Data

      The following tables summarize consolidated financial data regarding our business and should be read together with “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and our consolidated financial statements and the related notes included elsewhere in this prospectus.

                                           
Year Ended December 31,

1999 2000 2001 2002 2003





(in thousands, except per share data)
Consolidated Statement of Operations:
                                       
Net revenue(1)
  $ 111,856     $ 176,663     $ 192,440     $ 237,331     $ 299,302  
Gross profit
    20,591       31,132       19,645       60,215       83,842  
Income (loss) from operations
    (6,474 )     4,752       (15,303 )     10,612       16,037  
Net income (loss)
    (6,544 )     2,654       (19,484 )     8,139       13,097  
Deemed dividend on preferred stock
          (2,601 )           (17,881 )      
     
     
     
     
     
 
Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders:
  $ (6,544 )   $ 53     $ (19,484 )   $ (9,742 )   $ 13,097  
     
     
     
     
     
 
Net income (loss) per share attributable to common stockholders:
                                       
 
Basic
  $ (0.25 )   $ 0.00     $ (0.66 )   $ (0.46 )   $ 0.55  
     
     
     
     
     
 
 
Diluted
  $ (0.25 )   $ 0.00     $ (0.66 )   $ (0.46 )   $ 0.49  
     
     
     
     
     
 


(1)  On January 1, 2000, we adopted Emerging Issues Task Force, or EITF, Issue 01-09, “Accounting for Consideration Given by a Vendor to a Customer or Reseller of the Vendor’s Products,” and as a consequence, record cooperative marketing costs as a reduction in net revenue. Prior to January 1, 2000, it was not practical for us to determine the amount of cooperative marketing costs to record as a reduction of net revenue, and such amounts were included as sales and marketing expense.
         
December 31, 2003

(in thousands)
Consolidated Balance Sheet Data:
       
Cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments
  $ 73,605  
Working capital
    130,755  
Total assets
    205,146  
Total current liabilities
    70,207  
Total stockholders’ equity
    134,939  

4



Table of Contents

RISK FACTORS

      You should carefully consider the following information about the risks described below, together with the financial and other information contained in this prospectus, before you decide to buy our common stock.

Risks Related to Our Business and Industry

We expect our operating results to fluctuate on a quarterly and annual basis, which could cause our stock price to fluctuate or decline.

      Our operating results are difficult to predict and may fluctuate substantially from quarter-to-quarter or year-to-year for a variety of reasons, many of which are beyond our control. If our actual revenue were to fall below our estimates or the expectations of public market analysts or investors, our quarterly and annual results would be negatively impacted and the price of our stock could decline. Other factors that could affect our quarterly and annual operating results include those listed in this “Risk Factors” section of this prospectus and others such as:

  •  changes in the pricing policies of or the introduction of new products or product enhancements by us or our competitors;
 
  •  changes in the terms of our contracts with customers or suppliers;
 
  •  slow or negative growth in the networking product, personal computer, Internet infrastructure, home electronics and related technology markets, as well as decreased demand for Internet access;
 
  •  changes in or consolidation of our sales channel and wholesale distributor relationships or failure to manage our sales channel inventory and warehousing requirements;
 
  •  delay or failure to fulfill orders for our products on a timely basis;
 
  •  our inability to accurately forecast our contract manufacturing needs;
 
  •  delays in the introduction of new or enhanced products by us or market acceptance of these products;
 
  •  an increase in price protection claims, redemptions of marketing rebates, product warranty returns or allowance for doubtful accounts;
 
  •  operational disruptions, such as transportation delays or failure of our order processing system, particularly if they occur at the end of a fiscal quarter; and
 
  •  seasonal patterns of higher sales during the second half of our fiscal year, particularly retail-related sales in our fourth quarter.

      As a result, period-to-period comparisons of our operating results may not be meaningful, and you should not rely on them as an indication of our future performance. In addition, our future operating results may fall below the expectations of public market analysts or investors. In this event, our stock price could decline significantly.

Our future success is dependent on the acceptance of networking products in the small business and home markets into which we sell substantially all of our products. If the acceptance of networking products in these markets does not continue to grow, we will be unable to increase or sustain our net revenue, and our business will be severely harmed.

      We believe that growth in the small business market will depend, in significant part, on the growth of the number of personal computers purchased by these end users and the demand for sharing data intensive applications, such as large graphic files. We believe that acceptance of networking products in the home will depend upon the availability of affordable broadband Internet access and increased demand for wireless products. Unless these markets continue to grow, our business will be unable to expand, which could cause the value of your investment to decline. Moreover, if networking functions are integrated more directly into personal computers and other Internet-enabled devices, such as electronic games or personal video recorders, and these devices do not rely upon external network-enabling devices, sales of our products could suffer. In addition, if the small business or home markets experience a recession or other cyclical effects that diminish

5



Table of Contents

or delay networking expenditures, our business growth and profits would be severely limited, and our business could be more severely harmed than those companies that primarily sell to large business customers.

Some of our competitors have substantially greater resources than we do, and to be competitive we may be required to lower our prices or increase our advertising expenditures or other expenses, which could result in reduced margins and loss of market share.

      We compete in a rapidly evolving and highly competitive market, and we expect competition to intensify. Our principal competitors in the small business market include 3Com Corporation, Allied Telesyn International, Dell Computer Corporation, D-Link Systems, Inc., Hewlett-Packard Company, the Linksys division of Cisco Systems and Nortel Networks. Our principal competitors in the home market include Belkin Corporation, D-Link, the Linksys division of Cisco Systems and Microsoft Corporation. Other current and potential competitors include numerous local vendors such as Corega International SA and Melco, Inc./ Buffalo Technology in Japan and TP-Link in China. Our potential competitors also include consumer electronics vendors who could integrate networking capabilities into their line of products.

      Many of our existing and potential competitors have longer operating histories, greater name recognition and substantially greater financial, technical, sales, marketing and other resources, including Cisco Systems and Microsoft. These competitors may, among other things, undertake more extensive marketing campaigns, adopt more aggressive pricing policies, obtain more favorable pricing from suppliers and manufacturers and exert more influence on the sales channel than we can. In June 2003, Cisco Systems acquired The Linksys Group, a major competitor of ours. Cisco Systems has substantial resources that it may direct to developing or purchasing advanced technology, which might be superior to ours. In addition, it may direct substantial resources to expand its Linksys division’s distribution channel and to increase its advertising expenditures or otherwise use its resources to successfully compete. Any of these actions could cause us to materially increase our expenses, and could result in our being unable to successfully compete, which would harm our results of operations. We anticipate that current and potential competitors will also intensify their efforts to penetrate our target markets. These competitors may have more advanced technology, more extensive distribution channels, stronger brand names, greater access to shelf space in retail locations, bigger promotional budgets and larger customer bases than we do. These companies could devote more capital resources to develop, manufacture and market competing products than we could. If any of these companies are successful in competing against us, our sales could decline, our margins could be negatively impacted, and we could lose market share, any of which could seriously harm our business and results of operations.

The average selling prices of our products typically decrease rapidly over the sales cycle of the product, which may negatively affect our gross margins.

      Our products typically experience price erosion, a fairly rapid reduction in the average selling prices over their respective sales cycles. In order to sell products that have a falling average selling price and maintain margins at the same time, we need to continually reduce product and manufacturing costs. To manage manufacturing costs, we must collaborate with our third-party manufacturers to engineer the most cost-effective design for our products. In addition, we must carefully manage the price paid for components used in our products. We must also successfully manage our freight and inventory costs to reduce overall product costs. We also need to continually introduce new products with higher sales prices and gross margins in order to maintain our overall gross margins. If we are unable to manage the cost of older products or successfully introduce new products with higher gross margins, our net revenue and overall gross margin would likely decline.

If we fail to continue to introduce new products and product enhancements that achieve broad market acceptance on a timely basis, we will not be able to compete effectively and we will be unable to increase or maintain net revenue and gross margins.

      We operate in a highly competitive, quickly changing environment, and our future success depends on our ability to develop and introduce new products and product enhancements that achieve broad market acceptance in the small business and home markets. Our future success will depend in large part upon our

6



Table of Contents

ability to identify demand trends in the small business and home markets and quickly develop, manufacture and sell products that satisfy these demands in a cost effective manner. Successfully predicting demand trends is difficult, and it is very difficult to predict the effect introducing a new product will have on existing product sales. We will also need to respond effectively to new product announcements by our competitors by quickly introducing competitive products.

      We have experienced delays in releasing new products and product enhancements in the past, which resulted in lower quarterly net revenue than expected. For example, in 2000, we introduced a proprietary wireless networking solution. Later, we decided to re-design our products to be compliant with the 802.11 standard promulgated by the Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers. As a result, we introduced our wireless local area networking, or LAN, 802.11b products in the first quarter of 2001, six months behind some of our competitors. In addition, we have experienced unanticipated delays in product introductions beyond announced release dates. Any future delays in product development and introduction could result in:

  •  loss of or delay in revenue and loss of market share;
 
  •  negative publicity and damage to our reputation and brand;
 
  •  decline in the average selling price of our products; and
 
  •  adverse reactions in our sales channel, such as reduced shelf space or reduced online product visibility.

We depend substantially on our sales channel, and our failure to maintain and expand our sales channel would result in lower sales and reduced net revenue.

      To maintain and grow our market share, net revenue and brand, we must maintain and expand our sales channel. We sell our products through our sales channel, which consists of traditional retailers, on-line retailers, direct market resellers, or DMRs, value added resellers, or VARs, and, recently, broadband service providers. These entities typically purchase our products through our wholesale distributors. We sell to small businesses primarily through DMRs, VARs and retail locations, and we sell to our home users primarily through retail locations, online retailers and broadband service providers. We have no minimum purchase commitments or long-term contracts with any of these third parties.

      Traditional retailers have limited shelf space and promotional budgets, and competition is intense for these resources. A competitor with more extensive product lines and stronger brand identity, such as Microsoft or Cisco Systems, may have greater bargaining power with these retailers. The competition for retail shelf space may increase, which would require us to increase our marketing expenditures simply to maintain current levels of retail shelf space. The recent trend in the consolidation of online retailers and DMR channels has resulted in intensified competition for preferred product placement, such as product placement on an online retailer’s home page. Expanding our presence in the VAR channel may be difficult and expensive. We compete with established companies that have longer operating histories and longstanding relationships with VARs that we would find highly desirable as sales channel partners. If we were unable to maintain and expand our sales channel, our growth would be limited and our business would be harmed.

      We must also continuously monitor and evaluate emerging sales channels. If we fail to establish a presence in an important developing sales channel, such as selling networking products through broadband service providers such as cable operators and telecommunications carriers, our business could be harmed.

We rely on a limited number of wholesale distributors and direct customers for most of our sales, and if they refuse to pay our requested prices or reduce their level of purchases, our net revenue could decline.

      We sell a substantial portion of our products through wholesale distributors, including Ingram Micro, Inc. and Tech Data Corporation. During 2003, sales to Ingram Micro and its affiliates accounted for 31% of our net revenue and sales to Tech Data and its affiliates accounted for 15% of our net revenue. We expect that a significant portion of our net revenue will continue to come from sales to a small number of wholesale

7



Table of Contents

distributors for the foreseeable future. In addition, because our accounts receivable are concentrated with a small group of purchasers, the failure of any of them to pay on a timely basis, or at all, would reduce our cash flow. We have no minimum purchase commitments or long-term contracts with any of these distributors. These purchasers could decide at any time to discontinue, decrease or delay their purchases of our products. In addition, the prices that they pay for our products are subject to negotiation and could change at any time. If any of our major wholesale distributors reduce their level of purchases or refuse to pay the prices that we set for our products, our net revenue and operating results could be harmed. If our wholesale distributors increase the size of their product orders without sufficient lead-time for us to process the order, our ability to fulfill product demands would be compromised.

If we do not effectively manage our sales channel inventory and product mix, we may incur costs associated with excess inventory, or lose sales from having too few products.

      If we are unable to properly monitor, control and manage our sales channel inventory and maintain an appropriate level and mix of products with our wholesale distributors and within our sales channel, we may incur increased and unexpected costs associated with this inventory. We currently have particularly limited visibility as to the inventory levels of our international wholesale distributors and sales channel. We generally allow wholesale distributors and traditional retailers to return a limited amount of our products in exchange for other products. Under our price protection policy, if we reduce the list price of a product, we are often required to issue a credit in an amount equal to the reduction for each of the products held in inventory by our wholesale distributors and retailers. If our wholesale distributors and retailers are unable to sell their inventory in a timely manner, we might lower the price of the products, or these parties may exchange the products for newer products. If we improperly forecast demand for our products we could end up with too many products and be unable to sell the excess inventory in a timely manner, if at all, or, alternatively we could end up with too few products and not be able to satisfy demand. This problem is exacerbated because we attempt to closely match inventory levels with product demand leaving limited margin for error. If these events occur, we could incur increased expenses associated with writing off excessive or obsolete inventory or lose sales and therefore suffer declining gross margins.

We depend on a limited number of third-party contract manufacturers for substantially all of our manufacturing needs. If these contract manufacturers experience any delay, disruption or quality control problems in their operations, we could lose market share and our brand may suffer.

      All of our products are manufactured, assembled, tested and packaged by a limited number of original design manufacturers, or ODMs, and original equipment manufacturers, or OEMs. Substantially all of our products are manufactured by Ambit Microsystems, Cameo Communications Corporation, Delta Networks, Inc., SerComm Corporation and Z-Com, Inc. We rely on our contract manufacturers to procure components and, in some cases, subcontract engineering work. Some of our products are manufactured by a single contract manufacturer. We do not have any long-term contracts with any of our third-party contract manufacturers. Some of these third-party contract manufacturers produce products for our competitors. The loss of the services of any of our primary third-party contract manufacturers could cause a significant disruption in operations and delays in product shipments. Qualifying a new contract manufacturer and commencing volume production is expensive and time consuming.

      Our reliance on third-party contract manufacturers also exposes us to the following risks over which we have limited control:

  •  unexpected increases in manufacturing and repair costs;
 
  •  inability to control the quality of finished products;
 
  •  inability to control delivery schedules; and
 
  •  potential lack of adequate capacity to manufacture all or a part of the products we require.

      All of our products must satisfy safety and regulatory standards and some of our products must also receive government certifications. Our ODM and OEM contract manufacturers are primarily responsible for

8



Table of Contents

obtaining most regulatory approvals for our products. If our ODMs and OEMs fail to obtain timely domestic or foreign regulatory approvals or certificates, we would be unable to sell our products and our sales and profitability could be reduced, our relationships with our sales channel could be harmed, and our reputation and brand would suffer.

If we are unable to provide our third-party contract manufacturers an accurate forecast of our component and material requirements, we may experience delays in the manufacturing of our products and the costs of our products may increase.

      We provide our third-party contract manufacturers with a rolling forecast of demand, which they use to determine our material and component requirements. Lead times for ordering materials and components vary significantly and depend on various factors, such as the specific supplier, contract terms and demand and supply for a component at a given time. Some of our components have long lead times, such as local access network repeaters, switching fabric chips, physical layer transceivers, connector jacks and metal and plastic enclosures. If our forecasts are less than our actual requirements, our contract manufacturers may be unable to manufacture products in a timely manner. If our forecasts are too high, our contract manufacturers will be unable to use the components they have purchased on our behalf. The cost of the components used in our products tends to drop rapidly as volumes increase and the technologies mature. Therefore, if our contract manufacturers are unable to promptly use components purchased on our behalf, our cost of producing products may be higher than our competitors due to an over supply of higher-priced components. Moreover, if they are unable to use components ordered at our direction, we will need to reimburse them for any losses they incur.

If disruptions in our transportation network occur or our shipping costs substantially increase, we may be unable to sell our products and our operating expenses could increase.

      We are highly dependent upon the transportation systems we use to ship our products, including surface and air freight. Our attempts to closely match our inventory levels to our product demand intensify the need for our transportation systems to function effectively and without delay. The transportation network is subject to disruption from a variety of causes, including labor disputes or port strikes, acts of war or terrorism and natural disasters. For example, in September 2002, a major strike disrupted ports on the West Coast, which halted the transportation of our product shipments, resulting in our inability to meet some customer orders in a timely manner. Labor disputes among freight carriers are common, especially in Europe, Middle East and Africa, or EMEA, and we expect labor unrest and its effects on shipping our products to be a continuing challenge for us. Since September 11, 2001, the rate of inspection of international freight by governmental entities has substantially increased, and has become increasingly unpredictable. If our delivery times increase unexpectedly for these or any other reasons, our ability to deliver products on time would be materially adversely affected and result in delayed or lost revenue. In addition, if the recent increases in fuel prices were to continue, our transportation costs would likely further increase. Moreover, the cost of shipping our products by air freight is greater than other methods. From time to time in the past, we have shipped products using air freight to meet unexpected spikes in demand or to bring new product introductions to market quickly. If we rely more heavily upon air freight to deliver our products, our overall shipping costs will increase. A prolonged transportation disruption or a significant increase in the cost of freight could severely disrupt our business and harm our operating results.

We obtain several key components from limited or sole sources, and if these sources fail to satisfy our supply requirements, we may lose sales and experience increased component costs.

      Any shortage or delay in the supply of key product components would harm our ability to meet scheduled product deliveries. Many of the semiconductors used in our products are specifically designed for use in our products and are obtained from sole source suppliers on a purchase order basis. In addition, some components that are used in all our products are obtained from limited sources. These components include connector jacks, plastic casings and physical layer transceivers. We also obtain switching fabric semiconductors, which are used in our Ethernet switches and Internet gateway products, from a limited number of suppliers. Our contract manufacturers purchase these components on our behalf on a purchase

9



Table of Contents

order basis, and we do not have any contractual commitments or guaranteed supply arrangements with our suppliers. If demand for a specific component increases, we may not be able to obtain an adequate number of that component in a timely manner. In addition, if our suppliers experience financial or other difficulties or if worldwide demand for the components they provide increases significantly, the availability of these components could be limited. It could be difficult, costly and time-consuming to obtain alternative sources for these components, or to change product designs to make use of alternative components. In addition, difficulties in transitioning from an existing supplier to a new supplier could create delays in component availability that would have a significant impact on our ability to fulfill orders for our products. If we are unable to obtain a sufficient supply of components, or if we experience any interruption in the supply of components, our product shipments could be reduced or delayed. This would affect our ability to meet scheduled product deliveries, damage our brand and reputation in the market, and cause us to lose market share.

We rely upon third parties for technology that is critical to our products, and if we are unable to continue to use this technology and future technology, our ability to sell technologically advanced products would be limited.

      We rely on third parties to obtain non-exclusive patented hardware and software license rights in technologies that are incorporated into and necessary for the operation and functionality of our products. Because the intellectual property we license is available from third parties, barriers to entry may be lower than if we owned exclusive rights to the technology we license and use. On the other hand, if a competitor or potential competitor enters into an exclusive arrangement with any of our key third-party technology providers, our ability to develop and sell products containing that technology would be severely limited. Our licenses often require royalty payments or other consideration to third parties. Our success will depend in part on our continued ability to have access to these technologies, and we do not know whether these third-party technologies will continue to be licensed to us on commercially acceptable terms or at all. If we are unable to license the necessary technology, we may be forced to acquire or develop alternative technology of lower quality or performance standards. This would limit and delay our ability to offer competitive products and increase our costs of production. As a result, our margins, market share, and operating results could be significantly harmed.

If we are unable to secure and protect our intellectual property rights, our ability to compete could be harmed.

      We rely upon third parties for a substantial portion of the intellectual property we use in our products. At the same time, we rely on a combination of copyright, trademark, patent and trade secret laws, nondisclosure agreements with employees, consultants and suppliers and other contractual provisions to establish, maintain and protect our intellectual proprietary rights. Despite efforts to protect our intellectual property, unauthorized third parties may attempt to design around, copy aspects of our product design or obtain and use technology or other intellectual property associated with our products. For example, one of our primary intellectual property assets is the NETGEAR name, trademark and logo. We may be unable to stop third parties from adopting similar names, trademarks and logos, especially in those international markets where our intellectual property rights may be less protected. Furthermore, our competitors may independently develop similar technology or intellectual property associated with our products. Our inability to secure and protect our intellectual property rights could significantly harm our brand and business, operating results and financial condition.

We could become subject to litigation, including litigation regarding intellectual property rights, which could be costly and subject us to significant liability.

      The networking industry is characterized by the existence of a large number of patents and frequent claims and related litigation regarding infringement of patents, trade secrets and other intellectual property rights. In particular, leading companies in the data communications markets, some of which are competitors, have extensive patent portfolios with respect to networking technology. From time to time, third parties,

10



Table of Contents

including these leading companies, have asserted and may continue to assert exclusive patent, copyright, trademark and other intellectual property rights against us, demanding license or royalty payments or seeking payment of damages, injunctive relief and other available legal remedies through litigation. Although there is currently no intellectual property litigation pending against us, we could become subject to lawsuits in the future and be forced to defend against claims brought by third parties who allege infringement of their intellectual property rights. These include third parties who claim to own patents or other intellectual property that cover industry standards that our products comply with. From time to time we are contacted by third parties that allege we are wrongfully using their intellectual property. For example, we have been contacted by Cactus Services, Inc., CSIRO, ipValue, Motorola, Network-1 Security Solutions and Vertical Networks, each of which is seeking royalties or compensation from us for alleged intellectual property infringement. Several of these parties claim that we need to acquire a license because our products allegedly infringe on their intellectual property by virtue of the fact that our products comply with various industry-wide standards. If we are unable to resolve these matters or obtain licenses on acceptable or commercially reasonable terms, we could be sued. The cost of any necessary licenses could significantly harm our business, operating results and financial condition. Also, at any time, any of these companies, or any other third-party could initiate litigation against us, which could divert management attention, be costly to defend, prevent us from using or selling the challenged technology, require us to design around the challenged technology and cause the price of our stock to decline. In addition, third parties, some of which are potential competitors, may initiate litigation against our manufacturers, suppliers or members of our sales channel, alleging infringement of their proprietary rights with respect to existing or future products. In the event successful claims of infringement are brought by third parties, and if we are unable to obtain commercially acceptable licenses or to independently develop alternative technology on a timely basis, we may be subject to an indemnification obligation or unable to offer competitive products, and be subject to increased expenses. As a result, our business, operating results and financial condition could be significantly harmed.

If our products contain defects or errors, we could incur significant unexpected expenses, experience product returns and lost sales, suffer damage to our brand and reputation, and be subject to product liability or other claims.

      Our products are complex and may contain defects, errors or failures, particularly when first introduced or when new versions are released. For example, in the quarter ended September 29, 2002, we recalled some of our 48 port 10/100 Mbps Ethernet switches due to an intermittent connectivity issue with a connector. Some errors and defects may be discovered only after a product has been installed and used by the end user. If our products contain defects or errors, we could experience decreased sales and increased product returns, loss of customers and market share, and increased service, warranty and insurance costs. In addition, our reputation and brand could be damaged, and we could face legal claims regarding our products. A successful product liability or other claim could result in negative publicity and further harm our reputation, result in unexpected expenses and adversely impact our operating results.

We intend to implement an international restructuring, which may strain our resources and increase our operating expenses.

      By the end of 2004, we plan to reorganize foreign subsidiaries and entities to manage and optimize our international operations. Our implementation of this project will require substantial efforts by our staff and could result in increased staffing requirements and related expenses. Failure to successfully execute the restructuring or other factors outside our control could negatively impact the timing and extent of any benefit we receive from the restructuring. The restructuring will also require us to amend a number of our customer and supplier agreements, which will require the consent of our third-party customers and suppliers. In addition, there could be unanticipated interruptions in our business operations as a result of implementing these changes that could result in loss or delay in revenue causing an adverse effect on our financial results.

11



Table of Contents

We intend to expand our operations and infrastructure, which may strain our operations and increase our operating expenses.

      We intend to expand our operations and pursue market opportunities domestically and internationally to grow our sales. For example, we are intensifying our efforts to sell our products in China, Italy, Japan, Spain and Sweden. We expect that this expansion will strain our existing management information systems, and operational and financial controls. In addition, as we continue to grow, our expenditures will likely be significantly higher than our historical costs. We may not be able to install adequate controls in an efficient and timely manner as our business grows, and our current systems may not be adequate to support our future operations. The difficulties associated with installing and implementing these new systems, procedures and controls may place a significant burden on our management, operational and financial resources. In addition, as we grow internationally, we will have to expand and enhance our communications infrastructure. If we fail to continue to improve our management information systems, procedures and financial controls or encounter unexpected difficulties during expansion, our business could be harmed.

Our sales and operations in international markets expose us to operational, financial and regulatory risks.

      International sales comprise a significant amount of our overall net revenue. International sales were 37% in each of 2001 and 2002 and 42% in 2003. We anticipate that international sales may grow as a percentage of net revenue. We have committed resources to expanding our international operations and sales channels and these efforts may not be successful. International sales are subject to a number of risks. For example, we recognize revenue from our international sales when our products reach the country of destination. As a result, if these products are delayed in transit, we are unable to recognize revenue.

      International operations are subject to a number of other risks, including:

  •  political and economic instability, international terrorism and anti-American sentiment, particularly in emerging markets;
 
  •  preference for locally branded products, and laws and business practices favoring local competition;
 
  •  exchange rate fluctuations;
 
  •  increased difficulty in managing inventory;
 
  •  delayed revenue recognition;
 
  •  less effective protection of intellectual property; and
 
  •  difficulties and costs of staffing and managing foreign operations.

      We currently do not engage in any currency hedging transactions. Except for sales to Japan and Singapore, our international sales are currently invoiced in United States dollars. Nonetheless, as we expand our international operations, we are exploring the option of allowing both invoicing and payment in additional foreign currencies and our exposure to losses in foreign currency transactions may increase. Moreover, the costs of doing business abroad may increase as a result of adverse exchange rate fluctuations. For example, if the United States dollar declined in value relative to a local currency, we could be required to pay more for our expenditures in that market, including salaries, commissions, local operations and marketing expenses, each of which is paid in local currency. In addition, we may lose customers if exchange rate fluctuations, currency devaluations or economic crises increase the local currency price of our products or reduce our customers’ ability to purchase products.

If we lose the services of our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Patrick C.S. Lo, or our other key personnel, we may not be able to execute our business strategy effectively.

      Our future success depends in large part upon the continued services of our key technical, sales, marketing and senior management personnel. In particular, the services of Patrick C.S. Lo, our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, who has led our company since its inception, are very important to our business. All

12



Table of Contents

of our executive officers or key employees are at will employees, and we do not maintain any key person life insurance policies. The loss of any of our senior management or other key research, development, sales or marketing personnel, particularly if lost to competitors, could harm our ability to implement our business strategy and respond to the rapidly changing needs of the small business and home markets.

Natural disasters, mischievous actions or terrorist attacks could delay our ability to receive or ship our products, or otherwise disrupt our business.

      Our corporate headquarters are located in Northern California and one of our warehouses is located in Southern California, regions known for seismic activity. In addition, substantially all of our manufacturing occurs in a geographically concentrated area in mainland China, where disruptions from natural disasters, health epidemics and political, social and economic instability may affect the region. If our manufacturers or warehousing facilities are disrupted or destroyed, we would be unable to distribute our products on a timely basis, which could harm our business. Moreover, if our computer information systems or communication systems, or those of our vendors or customers, are subject to disruptive hacker attacks or other disruptions, our business could suffer. We have not established a formal disaster recovery plan. Our back-up operations may be inadequate and our business interruption insurance may not be enough to compensate us for any losses that may occur. A significant business interruption could result in losses or damages and harm our business. For example, much of our order fulfillment process is automated and the order information is stored on our servers. If our computer systems and servers go down even for a short period at the end of a quarter, our ability to recognize revenue would be delayed until we were again able to process and ship our orders, which could cause our stock price to decline significantly.

Risks Related to this Offering

Our stock price may be volatile and your investment in our common stock could suffer a decline in value.

      With the current uncertainty about economic conditions in the United States, there has been significant volatility in the market price and trading volume of securities of technology and other companies, which may be unrelated to the financial performance of these companies. These broad market fluctuations may negatively affect the market price of our common stock.

      Some specific factors that may have a significant effect on our common stock market price include:

  •  actual or anticipated fluctuations in our operating results or our competitors’ operating results;
 
  •  actual or anticipated changes in our growth rates or our competitors’ growth rates;
 
  •  conditions in the financial markets in general or changes in general economic conditions;
 
  •  our ability to raise additional capital; and
 
  •  changes in stock market analyst recommendations regarding our common stock, other comparable companies or our industry generally.

The large number of shares eligible for public sale could cause our stock price to decline.

      A small number of stockholders own a substantial number of shares of our stock. Many of our largest holders will have rights, subject to some conditions, to require us to file registration statements covering their shares or to include their shares in registration statements that we may file for ourselves or other stockholders. Moreover, substantially all of the common stock issued upon exercise of options under our stock option plans and employee stock purchase plan can be freely sold in the public market. If any of these holders cause a large number of securities to be sold in the public market, the sales could reduce the trading price of our common stock. These sales also could impede our ability to raise future capital. Please see “Shares Eligible for Future Sale” for a description of sales that may occur in the future.

13



Table of Contents

Concentration of ownership among our existing executive officers, directors and principal stockholders may prevent new investors from influencing significant corporate decisions and may result in a lower trading price for our stock than if ownership of our stock was less concentrated.

      Upon completion of this offering, our executive officers, directors and principal stockholders will beneficially own, in total, approximately 34.9% of our outstanding common stock. As a result, these stockholders, acting together, could have the ability to exert substantial influence over all matters requiring approval by our stockholders, including the election and removal of directors and any proposed merger, consolidation or sale of all or substantially all of our assets and other corporate transactions. This concentration of control could be disadvantageous to other stockholders with interests different from those of our officers, directors and principal stockholders. For example, our officers, directors and principal stockholders could delay or prevent an acquisition or merger even if the transaction would benefit other stockholders. In addition, this significant concentration of share ownership may adversely affect the trading price for our common stock because investors often perceive disadvantages in owning stock in companies with controlling stockholders. Please see “Principal Stockholders” for a more detailed description of our share ownership.

Some provisions of our charter and by-laws may delay or prevent transactions that many stockholders may favor, and may have the effect of entrenching management.

      Some provisions of our certificate of incorporation and by-laws may discourage, delay or prevent a merger or acquisition that our stockholders may consider favorable, including transactions in which stockholders might otherwise receive a premium for their shares. These provisions include:

  •  authorization of the issuance of “blank check” preferred stock without the need for stockholder approval;
 
  •  elimination of the ability of stockholders to call special meetings of stockholders or act by written consent; and
 
  •  advance notice requirements for proposing matters that can be acted on by stockholders at stockholder meetings.

      In addition, some provisions of Delaware law may also discourage, delay or prevent someone from acquiring us or merging with us. Such provisions of Delaware law and the provisions of our certificate of incorporation may have the effect of entrenching management by making it more difficult to remove directors. See the section of this prospectus entitled “Description of Capital Stock — Certain Provisions of our Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws and Delaware Anti-Takeover Law” for more detailed information regarding these provisions.

14



Table of Contents

SPECIAL NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

      This prospectus includes forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. All statements other than statements of historical facts contained in this prospectus, including statements regarding our future financial position, business strategy and plans and objectives of management for future operations, are forward-looking statements. The words “believe,” “may,” “will,” “estimate,” “continue,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “should,” “plan,” “expect” and similar expressions, as they relate to us, are intended to identify forward-looking statements. We have based these forward-looking statements largely on our current expectations and projections about future events and financial trends that we believe may affect our financial condition, results of operations, business strategy and financial needs. These forward-looking statements are subject to a number of risks, uncertainties and assumptions described in “Risk Factors” and elsewhere in this prospectus, including, among other things:

  •  the future growth of the small business and home markets;
 
  •  our business strategies and development plans;
 
  •  new products and technologies;
 
  •  future operating expenses and financing requirements; and
 
  •  competition and competitive factors in the small business and home markets.

      In light of these risks, uncertainties and assumptions, the forward-looking events and circumstances discussed in this prospectus may not occur and actual results could differ materially from those anticipated or implied in the forward-looking statements.

15



Table of Contents

USE OF PROCEEDS

      We will not receive any of the proceeds from the sale of the shares of our common stock in this offering other than reimbursement of certain out-of-pocket expenses of the offering. The selling stockholders will receive all of the net proceeds from this offering. We anticipate the selling stockholders will bear substantially all of the out-of-pocket expenses of the offering.

MARKET PRICE OF COMMON STOCK

      Our common stock has been quoted on the Nasdaq National Market under the symbol “NTGR” since July 31, 2003. Prior to that time, there was no public market for our common stock. The following table sets forth for the indicated periods the high and low sales prices of our common stock on the Nasdaq National Market.

                   
High Low


2003
               
 
Third Quarter (beginning July 31, 2003)
  $ 20.90     $ 14.00  
 
Fourth Quarter
  $ 18.73     $ 12.86  
2004
               
 
First Quarter (through March 12, 2004)
  $ 20.09     $ 13.98  

      On March 12, 2004, there were approximately 53 stockholders of record.

STOCK PERFORMANCE GRAPH

      The following graph compares the change in the cumulative total stockholder return on NETGEAR’s common stock during the period from July 31, 2003, the date on which our stock commenced trading on the Nasdaq National Market, through March 12, 2004, with the cumulative total return on the Nasdaq Market Index and the Nasdaq Computer Index. The comparison assumes reinvestment of dividends, if any.

ASSUMES $100 INVESTED ON JULY 31, 2003

ASSUMES DIVIDEND REINVESTED
THROUGH FEBRUARY 20, 2004
                                 
July 31, 2003 September 28, 2003 December 31, 2003 March 12, 2004




NETGEAR, INC
  $ 100.00     $ 118.00     $ 114.21     $ 106.71  
NASDAQ COMPUTER INDEX
  $ 100.00     $ 105.68     $ 116.78     $ 110.34  
NASDAQ MARKET INDEX
  $ 100.00     $ 103.29     $ 115.47     $ 114.39  

Notes:

  A.  The Index level for all series was set to 100.00 on July 31, 2003.
  B.  The stock price performance shown on the table is not necessarily indicative of future performance. Information used on the graph was obtained from the Nasdaq.com website, a source management believes to be reliable, but we are not responsible for any errors or omissions in such information.

DIVIDEND POLICY

      We have never declared or paid cash dividends on our capital stock and we currently intend to retain future earnings, if any, to finance the operation and expansion of our business and we do not anticipate paying cash dividends in the foreseeable future. In addition, if we were to borrow against our existing credit facility, we would be prohibited from paying cash dividends.

16



Table of Contents

CAPITALIZATION

      The following table summarizes our capitalization as of December 31, 2003. You should read this table in conjunction with “Selected Consolidated Financial Data,” “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and our consolidated financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this prospectus.

           
As of December 31, 2003

(in thousands, except share
and per share data)
Cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments
  $ 73,605  
     
 
Total debt
     
Preferred stock: $0.001 par value; shares authorized, 5,000,000
       
Stockholders’ equity:
       
 
Common stock: $0.001 par value; shares authorized, 200,000,000; shares issued and outstanding, 28,618,969
    28  
 
Additional paid-in capital
    164,459  
 
Deferred stock-based compensation
    (4,248 )
 
Cumulative other comprehensive income
    13  
 
Accumulated deficit
    (25,313 )
     
 
Total stockholders’ equity
    134,939  
     
 
Total capitalization
  $ 134,939  
     
 

      The table above excludes the following shares:

  •  6,561,693 shares of common stock subject to stock options outstanding as of December 31, 2003, with a weighted average exercise price of $5.39 per share;
 
  •  1,396,412 shares of common stock available for future grant or issuance under our stock plan as of December 31, 2003; and
 
  •  500,000 shares of common stock available for future grant or issuance under our employee stock purchase plan as of December 31, 2003.

17



Table of Contents

SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA

      The following selected consolidated financial data should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and related notes, and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” included elsewhere in this prospectus.

      The consolidated statements of operations data for the years ended December 31, 2001, 2002 and 2003 and the consolidated balance sheet data as of December 31, 2002 and 2003 are derived from audited financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus. The consolidated statements of operations data for the years ended December 31, 1999 and 2000, and the consolidated balance sheet data as of December 31, 1999, 2000 and 2001 are derived from audited consolidated financial statements not included in this prospectus. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP performed the audits of the consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2001, 2002 and 2003 and for the years then ended. The audits of the consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 1999 and 2000 and for the years then ended were performed by another independent accountant.

                                               
Year Ended December 31,

1999 2000 2001 2002 2003





(in thousands, except per share data)
Consolidated Statement of Operations Data:
                                       
Net revenue(1)
  $ 111,856     $ 176,663     $ 192,440     $ 237,331     $ 299,302  
     
     
     
     
     
 
Cost of revenue:
                                       
 
Cost of revenue
    91,265       145,531       172,795       176,972       215,332  
 
Amortization of deferred stock-based compensation
                      144       128  
     
     
     
     
     
 
     
Total cost of revenue
    91,265       145,531       172,795       177,116       215,460  
     
     
     
     
     
 
Gross profit
    20,591       31,132       19,645       60,215       83,842  
     
     
     
     
     
 
Operating expenses:
                                       
 
Research and development
    2,641       3,319       4,432       7,359       8,220  
 
Sales and marketing(1)
    20,320       18,309       24,267       32,622       48,963  
 
General and administrative
    3,769       4,417       5,914       8,103       8,977  
 
Goodwill amortization
    335       335       335              
 
Amortization of deferred stock-based compensation:
                                       
   
Research and development
                      306       454  
   
Sales and marketing
                      346       715  
   
General and administrative
                      867       476  
     
     
     
     
     
 
     
Total operating expenses
    27,065       26,380       34,948       49,603       67,805  
     
     
     
     
     
 
Income (loss) from operations
    (6,474 )     4,752       (15,303 )     10,612       16,037  
Interest income
          1,092       308       119       364  
Interest expense
                (939 )     (1,240 )     (901 )
Extinguishment of debt
                            (5,868 )
Other expense, net
    (70 )     (1,322 )     (478 )     (19 )     (59 )
     
     
     
     
     
 
Income (loss) before taxes
    (6,544 )     4,522       (16,412 )     9,472       9,573  
Provision (benefit) for income taxes
          1,868       3,072       1,333       (3,524 )
     
     
     
     
     
 
Net income (loss)
    (6,544 )     2,654       (19,484 )     8,139       13,097  
Deemed dividend on preferred stock
          (2,601 )           (17,881 )      
     
     
     
     
     
 
Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders
  $ (6,544 )   $ 53     $ (19,484 )   $ (9,742 )   $ 13,097  
     
     
     
     
     
 
Net income (loss) per share attributable to common stockholders:
                                       
 
Basic(2)
  $ (0.25 )   $ 0.00     $ (0.66 )   $ (0.46 )   $ 0.55  
     
     
     
     
     
 
 
Diluted(2)
  $ (0.25 )   $ 0.00     $ (0.66 )   $ (0.46 )   $ 0.49  
     
     
     
     
     
 


(1)  On January 1, 2000, we adopted Emerging Issues Task Force, or EITF, Issue 01-09, “Accounting for Consideration Given by a Vendor to a Customer or Reseller of the Vendor’s Products,” and as a

18



Table of Contents

consequence, record cooperative marketing costs as a reduction in net revenue. Prior to January 1, 2000, it was not practical for us to determine the amount of cooperative marketing costs to record as a reduction of net revenue, and such amounts were included as sales and marketing expense.
 
(2)  Information regarding calculation of per share data is described in Note 4 to the consolidated financial statements.
                                         
Year Ended December 31,

1999 2000 2001 2002 2003





(in thousands)
Consolidated Balance Sheet Data:
                                       
Cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments
  $ 10,427     $ 6,447     $ 9,152     $ 19,880     $ 73,605  
Working capital
    22,989       36,253       16,179       13,753       130,755  
Total assets
    62,220       112,142       62,902       93,851       205,146  
Total current liabilities
    37,635       73,946       44,891       76,396       70,207  
Redeemable convertible preferred stock
          44,078       44,078       48,052        
Total stockholders’ equity (deficit)
    24,129       (6,583 )     (26,067 )     (30,597 )     134,939  

19



Table of Contents

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF

FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

      You should read the following discussion of our financial condition and results of operations together with the audited consolidated financial statements and notes to the financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus. This discussion contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. The forward-looking statements are not historical facts, but rather are based on current expectations, estimates, assumptions and projections about our industry, business and future financial results. Our actual results could differ materially from the results contemplated by these forward-looking statements due to a number of factors, including those discussed in the sections of this prospectus entitled “Risk Factors” and “Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements.”

Overview

      We design, develop and market technologically advanced, branded networking products that address the specific needs of small business and home users. We supply innovative networking products that meet the ease-of-use, quality, reliability, performance and affordability requirements of these users. From our inception in January 1996 until May 1996, our operating activities related primarily to research and development, developing relationships with outsourced design, manufacturing and technical support partners, testing prototype designs, staffing a sales and marketing organization and establishing relationships with distributors and resellers. We began product shipments during the quarter ended June 30, 1996, and recorded net revenue of $4.0 million in 1996. In 2003, our net revenue was $299.3 million and our net income was $13.1 million.

      We were incorporated in January 1996 as a wholly owned subsidiary of Bay Networks, Inc. to focus exclusively on providing networking solutions for small businesses and homes. In August 1998, Nortel Networks purchased Bay Networks, including its wholly owned subsidiary NETGEAR. We remained a wholly owned subsidiary of Nortel Networks until March 2000 when we sold a portion of our capital stock to Pequot Private Equity Fund II, L.P. as part of a joint effort by us and Nortel Networks to reduce Nortel Networks’ ownership interest in us. In September 2000, Nortel Networks sold a portion of its ownership interest in us to Shamrock Holdings of California, Inc., which is a related party to Shamrock Capital Growth Fund, L.P.; Blue Ridge Limited Partnership and an affiliated fund; Halyard Capital Fund, LP; The Abernathy Group Institutional HSN Fund, L.P. and an affiliated fund; and Delta International Holding Ltd. In February 2002, Nortel Networks sold its remaining ownership interest in NETGEAR to us in exchange for cash, non-cash consideration, and a $20.0 million promissory note. In July 2003 we completed our initial public offering of common stock. We sold 8,050,000 shares of common stock at an offering price of $14.00 per share. We received net proceeds of approximately $101.8 million after deducting the underwriting discount and offering expenses payable by us. A portion of the proceeds has been used to fully repay the $20.0 million promissory note.

      Our extensive product line currently includes approximately 100 different products. These products are available in multiple configurations to address the needs of our customers in each geographic region in which our products are sold. Our products are grouped into three major segments within the small business and home markets: Ethernet networking products, broadband products and wireless networking products. Ethernet networking products include switches, network interface cards, or NICs, and print servers. Broadband products include routers and gateways. Wireless networking products include wireless access points, wireless NICs and media adapters. Since we originally launched our business in 1996 with the shipment of Ethernet networking products and a single broadband product, we have continually introduced new products in response to market demand. For example, in 2003, we introduced approximately 48 new products.

      Our products are sold through multiple sales channels worldwide, including traditional retailers, online retailers, direct market resellers, or DMRs, value added resellers, or VARs, and broadband service providers. Our retail channel includes traditional retail locations domestically and internationally, such as Best Buy, Circuit City, CompUSA, Costco, Fry’s Electronics, Staples, Office Depot, MediaMarkt (Germany, Austria), PC World (U.K.) and FNAC (France). Online retailers include Amazon.com and Buy.com. Our direct market

20



Table of Contents

resellers include CDW Corporation and PC Connection. We have over 8,000 VARs in North America, and more than 3,000 internationally. In addition, we also sell our products through broadband service providers, such as Time–Warner Cable and Comcast in domestic markets and Telstra in Australia and Tele Denmark. Some of these retailers and resellers purchase directly from us while most are fulfilled through approximately 67 wholesale distributors around the world. A substantial portion of our net revenue to date has been derived from a limited number of wholesale distributors, the largest of which are Ingram Micro Inc., and Tech Data Corporation. We expect that these wholesale distributors will continue to contribute a significant percentage of our net revenue for the foreseeable future.

      The table below sets forth the percentage of net revenue derived from these major wholesale distributors for the years ended December 31, 2001, 2002 and 2003, respectively.

                           
Year Ended
December 31,

2001 2002 2003



Ingram Micro
    36 %     32 %     31 %
Tech Data
    23       20       15  
     
     
     
 
 
Total
    59 %     52 %     46 %
     
     
     
 

      We derive a substantial portion of our net revenue from international sales. International sales as a percentage of net revenue grew from 37% in each of 2001 and 2002 to 42% in 2003. Sales in EMEA grew from $68.0 million in 2002 to $99.4 million in 2003, representing an increase of approximately 46% during that period. We continue to penetrate growing markets such as China, Italy, Japan, Spain and Sweden. The table below sets forth our net revenue by major geographic region.

                                           
Year Ended December 31,

Percentage Percentage
2001 Change 2002 Change 2003





(in thousands)
North America
  $ 121,688       23%     $ 150,096       15%     $ 172,885  
EMEA
    52,977       28%       68,006       46%       99,422  
Asia Pacific and rest of world
    17,775       8%       19,229       40%       26,995  
     
     
     
     
     
 
 
Total
  $ 192,440       23%     $ 237,331       26%     $ 299,302  
     
     
     
     
     
 

      Our net revenue consists of gross product shipments, less allowances for estimated returns for stock rotation and warranty, price protection, customer rebates, cooperative marketing expenses and net changes in deferred revenue. Revenue from product sales is generally recognized at the time the product is shipped, provided that persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, title and risk of loss has transferred to the customer, the sales price is fixed or determinable and collectibility of the related receivable is reasonably assured. Currently, for our international customers, title passes upon delivery to the port of destination. For select retailers to whom we sell directly, title passes upon their receipt of product. At the end of each quarter, we estimate and defer revenue related to the product in-transit to international customers and retail customers that purchase directly from us based upon title passage, and distributor and reseller channel inventory that we estimate may be returned to us under their stock rotation rights.

      Prior to the year ended December 31, 2001, we recognized revenue on shipments to domestic distributors upon resale by those distributors, and on shipment to international distributors upon cash collection. Beginning in 2001, we had sufficient historical evidence with respect to returns and cash collections to enable us to recognize revenue in accordance with our current policy as described above and in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements. Our net revenue for the year ended December 31, 2001 reflects the one-time effect of this change, resulting in additional revenue of $21.0 million in the quarter ended March 31, 2001, offset partially by provisions for returns for stock rotation and warranty and price protection of $9.4 million.

21



Table of Contents

      Our financial condition and results of operations have been and are likely to continue to be affected by seasonal patterns. In the past, we have experienced higher net revenue during the second half of the year, with our highest net revenue during the year-end holiday season. Absent other factors, we would therefore expect higher net revenue in the third and fourth quarter of each year. To the extent our retail sales increase as a percentage of our net revenue, we expect to experience seasonally higher net revenue as a percentage of annual net revenue in the third and fourth quarters.

      Intense competition and technological advances characterize the small business and home networking markets. As a result, we expect to experience rapid erosion of average selling prices over the course of the lifecycle of our products due to competitive pricing pressures. In order to maintain our margins, it is necessary to offset average sales price erosion by negotiating continuously with component suppliers and contract manufacturers to reduce unit costs of incoming inventory. We also expect to continue to introduce new products and broaden our geographic and channel reach. These efforts require significant up front investment in advance of incremental revenue, which could impact our margins. In addition, our international expansion will expose us to additional risks related to foreign currency fluctuations.

      Cost of revenue consists primarily of the following: the cost of finished products from our third-party contract manufacturers; overhead costs including purchasing, product planning, inventory control, warehousing and distribution logistics; and freight, warranty and inventory costs. We outsource our manufacturing, warehousing and distribution logistics. We believe this outsourcing strategy allows us to better manage our product costs and gross margin. Our gross margin is affected by other factors, including changes in net revenues due to average selling prices, marketing expenses such as promotional activities and rebate redemptions, and changes in our cost of goods sold due to fluctuations in warranty and overhead costs, prices paid for components and freight and increases in excess or obsolete inventory caused by fluctuations in manufacturing volumes and transitions from older to newer products.

      Research and development expenses consist primarily of personnel expenses, payments to suppliers for design services, tooling, safety and regulatory testing, product certification expenditures to qualify our products for sale into specific markets and other consulting fees and product certification fees paid to third parties. Research and development expenses are recognized as they are incurred. We have invested in building our research and development organization to allow us to introduce innovative and easy to use products. We expect to continue to add additional employees in our research and development department. We believe that research and development expenses will increase in absolute dollars in the future but expect it to remain relatively stable as a percentage of net revenue as we expand into new hardware and software networking product technologies and enhance the ease-of-use of our products and broaden our core competencies.

      Sales and marketing expenses consist primarily of advertising, trade shows, corporate communications and other marketing expenses, personnel expenses for sales and marketing staff, product marketing expenses and technical support expenses. We believe that maintaining and building brand awareness is key to both net revenue growth and maintaining our gross margin. We also believe that maintaining widely available and high quality technical support is key to building and maintaining brand awareness. Accordingly, we expect sales and marketing expenses to increase in absolute dollars in the future, related to the planned growth of our business.

      General and administrative expenses consist of salaries and related expenses for executive, finance and accounting, human resources and management information systems personnel, professional fees, bad debt provision, and other corporate expenses. We expect general and administrative expenses to increase in absolute dollars as we add personnel and incur additional expenses related to the growth of our business and continued operations as a public company.

      Goodwill amortization relates to goodwill recorded in connection with Nortel Networks’ purchase of Bay Networks in August 1998. Upon adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards, or SFAS, No. 142, we discontinued amortizing goodwill in the year ended December 31, 2002.

      During the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2003 we recorded deferred stock-based compensation of $6.7 million and $1.0 million, respectively, in connection with stock options granted with exercise prices

22



Table of Contents

below the deemed fair value of our common stock on the date of grant. We are amortizing this deferred stock-based compensation over the four-year vesting period of the stock options and such amounts are allocated to the respective operating expense categories based upon individual employee departments.

      Interest income represents amounts earned on our cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments. Interest expense consists of interest paid on loans, and beginning in February 2002, included imputed interest associated with a note payable to Nortel Networks. The note had a principal amount of $20.0 million, with principal and accrued but unpaid interest due on February 7, 2009. Interest on the note, at 7% per year, was due to start accruing on February 7, 2005. The note was carried at its “then” present value and we were accreting its carrying value to reflect its imputed interest. We used approximately $20.0 million of the net proceeds from its initial public offering in August 2003 to fully repay the note. As a result of this $20.0 million cash payment, we incurred an extinguishment of debt charge of approximately $5.9 million in the quarter ended September 28, 2003 when the note was repaid in full.

      Other expense, net, primarily represents gains and losses on transactions denominated in foreign currencies and other miscellaneous expenses.

      We incurred net losses in each year from our inception in 1996 through 1999 as we invested in building our research and development capabilities, our sales channels and staff, and our operations and financial infrastructure. We accumulated a deficit of $24.6 million during this time period. In 2000 we earned net income of $2.7 million primarily due to growth in revenue of $64.8 million. In 2001 we incurred a net loss of $19.5 million primarily due to excess inventory levels brought about by the overall weak economic conditions in the networking markets we serve. We were again profitable in 2002, with net income of $8.1 million, due to increased revenue and improved gross margins. In 2003 we had net income of $13.1 million and our net revenue increased 26% compared with 2002. In addition, our gross margins increased 2.6% year over year. We believe our future results will be dependent upon the overall economic conditions in the markets we serve, the competitive environment in which we operate, and our ability to successfully implement our strategy, among other things. For additional information on factors that will affect our future performance, see “Risk Factors” beginning on page 5.

23



Table of Contents

Results of Operations

      The following table sets forth the consolidated statements of operations and the percentage change from the preceding year for the periods indicated:

                                               
Year Ended December 31,

Percentage Percentage
2001 Change 2002 Change 2003





Net revenue
  $ 192,440       23.3 %   $ 237,331       26.1 %   $ 299,302  
Cost of revenue:
                                       
 
Cost of revenue
    172,795       2.4       176,972       21.7       215,332  
 
Amortization of deferred stock-based compensation
                144       (11.1 )     128  
     
     
     
     
     
 
 
Total Cost of revenue
    172,795       2.5       177,116       21.6       215,460  
     
     
     
     
     
 
Gross profit
    19,645       206.5       60,215       39.2       83,842  
     
     
     
     
     
 
Operating expenses:
                                       
 
Research and development
    4,432       66.0       7,359       11.7       8,220  
 
Sales and marketing
    24,267       34.4       32,622       50.1       48,963  
 
General and administrative
    5,914       37.0       8,103       10.8       8,977  
 
Goodwill amortization
    335       (100.0 )                  
 
Amortization of deferred stock-based compensation:
                                       
   
Research and development
                306       48.4       454  
   
Sales and marketing
                346       106.6       715  
   
General and administrative
                867       (45.1 )     476  
     
     
     
     
     
 
     
Total operating expenses
    34,948       41.9       49,603       36.7       67,805  
     
     
     
     
     
 
Income (loss) from operations
    (15,303 )     *       10,612       51.1       16,037  
Extinguishment of debt
                            (5,868 )
Other income (expense), net
    (1,109 )     *       (1,140 )     *       (596 )
     
     
     
     
     
 
Income (loss) before income taxes
    (16,412 )     *       9,472       1.1       9,573  
Provision (benefit) for income taxes
    3,072       (56.6 )     1,333       (364.4 )     (3,524 )
     
     
     
     
     
 
Net income (loss)
  $ (19,484 )     *     $ 8,139       60.9 %   $ 13,097  
     
     
     
     
     
 

Percentage change not meaningful as prior year basis is a negative amount.

24



Table of Contents

      The following table sets forth the consolidated statements of operations, expressed as a percentage of net revenue, for the periods indicated:

                               
Year Ended December 31,

2001 2002 2003



Net revenue
    100.0 %     100.0 %     100.0 %
     
     
     
 
Cost of revenue:
                       
 
Cost of revenue
    89.8       74.6       72.0  
 
Amortization of deferred stock-based compensation
          0.0       0.0  
     
     
     
 
     
Total cost of revenue
    89.8       74.6       72.0  
     
     
     
 
Gross margin
    10.2       25.4       28.0  
     
     
     
 
 
Operating expenses:
                       
 
Research and development
    2.3       3.1       2.7  
 
Sales and marketing
    12.6       13.8       16.4  
 
General and administrative
    3.1       3.4       3.0  
 
Goodwill amortization
    0.2              
 
Amortization of deferred stock-based compensation:
                       
   
Research and development
          0.1       0.1  
   
Sales and marketing
          0.1       0.2  
   
General and administrative
          0.4       0.2  
     
     
     
 
     
Total operating expenses
    18.2       20.9       22.6  
     
     
     
 
Income (loss) from operations
    (8.0 )     4.5       5.4  
Extinguishment of debt
                (2.0 )
Other income (expense), net
    (0.5 )     (0.5 )     (0.2 )
     
     
     
 
Income (loss) before taxes
    (8.5 )     4.0       3.2  
Provision (benefit) for income taxes
    1.6       0.6       (1.2 )
     
     
     
 
Net income (loss)
    (10.1 )%     3.4 %     4.4 %
     
     
     
 
 
      Year Ended December 31, 2003 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2002

          Net Revenue

      Net revenue increased $62.0 million, or 26%, to $299.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2003, from $237.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2002. This increase was primarily due to an increase in gross shipments of our existing products and to the introduction of various new products that were favorably received by customers. In particular, net revenue in the EMEA region grew by $31.4 million, or 46%, year over year. This increase was partially offset by a $14.1 million increase in rebates and cooperative marketing costs, primarily in North America, associated with increased product sales. Net revenue for the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2003 was reduced for cooperative marketing expenses in the amount of $15.4 million and $23.5 million, respectively, deemed to be sales incentives under Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) 01-9.

          Cost of Revenue and Gross Margin

      Cost of revenue increased $38.3 million, or 22%, to $215.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2003 from $177.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2002. Our gross margin improved to 28.0% for the year ended December 31, 2003, from 25.4% for the year ended December 31, 2002. The improvement in gross margin was primarily due to a favorable shift in product mix, especially of newer products which often carry higher gross margins, as well as due to operational efficiency and supply chain management programs

25



Table of Contents

that reduced inbound freight costs by $2.1 million and excess and obsolete inventory charges by approximately $4.4 million. Furthermore, we were able to negotiate better pricing with our contract manufacturers and chip vendors due to increased volumes.

          Operating Expenses

      Research and development. Research and development expenses increased $861,000, or 12% to $8.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2003, from $7.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2002. The increase was primarily due to increased headcount and salary increases for existing employees of $1.3 million, general overhead increases of approximately $336,000 offset by $830,000 in lower product development costs, which include product certification costs.

      Sales and marketing. Sales and marketing expenses increased $16.3 million or 50% to $49.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2003, from $32.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2002. This was primarily due to (i) $3.9 million in increased expenses related to the addition of sales and marketing personnel and salary increases for existing employees; (ii) increased sales volume, product promotion, advertising and outside technical support expenses of $9.8 million; and (iii) freight out charges of $1.5 million. Furthermore, we incurred additional costs associated with entering new and expanding our presence in markets such as China, Italy, Japan, Spain and Sweden.

      General and administrative. General and administrative expenses increased $874,000, or 11% to $9.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2003, from $8.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2002. The increase was primarily attributable to an increase in cost associated with operating as a public company, including increased directors and officers insurance of $550,000 and professional services of $478,000, comprised of systems consulting, accounting and legal fees. This increase was offset by reduced payroll expenses of approximately $220,000 mainly as a result of lower bonus payments.

      Goodwill amortization. Goodwill amortization expense was zero for the year ended December 31, 2003 and 2002. There was no impairment charge that management believed necessary in the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2003.

      Amortization of deferred stock-based compensation. During the year ended December 31, 2003, we recorded amortization of deferred stock-based compensation of $128,000 in cost of revenue, $454,000 in research and development expenses, $715,000 in sales and marketing expenses, and $476,000 in general and administrative expenses. This compared to $144,000 in cost of revenue, $306,000 in research and development expenses, $346,000 in sales and marketing expenses and $867,000 in general and administrative expenses in the year ended December 31, 2002. The remaining balance of deferred stock-based compensation of $4.2 million will continue to be amortized on a straight line basis until 2007.

          Interest Income, Interest Expense and Other Income (Expense), Net

      The aggregate of interest income, interest expense, and other income (expense), net, decreased $544,000, to a net expense of $596,000 for the year ended December 31, 2003, from a net expense of $1.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2002. This decrease was attributable to increased interest income of $245,000 due to an increase in the average cash balance. Additionally, interest expense was reduced by $339,000 following the repayment of the Nortel Note.

          Extinguishment of Debt

      During the year ended December 31, 2003 we used $20.0 million of the initial public offering proceeds, to repay debt that had a carrying value of $14.1 million. The repayment of debt resulted in the recognition of an extinguishment of debt charge of $5.9 million in the third quarter of 2003 due to the acceleration of interest expense equal to the unamortized discounted balance at the date of repayment.

26



Table of Contents

          Provision (Benefit) for Income Taxes

      We recorded a benefit for income taxes of $3.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2003, compared to a provision for income taxes of $1.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2002. This benefit was primarily due to the reversal of the valuation allowance against our deferred tax assets of $9.8 million recorded in the second quarter of 2003. The valuation allowance was reversed because we determined that it is more likely than not that certain future tax benefits will be realized. This benefit was partially offset by an increase in tax of $2.6 million for debt extinguishment, which is treated as a permanent non-deductible expense for tax purposes. The year ended December 31, 2002 included a benefit associated with the change to valuation allowance on deferred tax assets of $3.8 million, arising from, among other factors, the utilization of net operating loss tax carry forwards.

          Net Income

      Net income increased $5.0 million, to $13.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2003 from $8.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2002. This increase was due to an increase in gross profit of $23.6 million, a benefit in the income tax provision of $4.9 million, offset by a charge for the extinguishment of debt, related to a note payable to Nortel Networks, of $5.9 million and an increase in operating expenses of $18.2 million.

 
Year Ended December 31, 2002 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2001

          Net Revenue

      Net revenue increased $44.9 million, or 23%, to $237.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2002, from $192.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2001. This increase was primarily due to an increase in gross shipments associated with the introduction of new wireless LAN and broadband gateway products such as our 802.11b Wireless PC Card NIC and our Cable/ DSL Web Safe Gateway during 2002, partially offset by an increase in rebates and cooperative marketing costs of $9.2 million associated with increased retail product sales. Net revenue for years ended December 31, 2001 and 2002 was reduced for cooperative marketing expenses in the amount of $10.3 million and $15.4 million, respectively, deemed to be sales incentives under Emerging Issues Task Force Issue (“EITF”) 01-9. The adoption of EITF Issue 01-9 did not have an impact on net income because there was a corresponding reduction in sales and marketing expenses.

          Cost of Revenue and Gross Margin

      Cost of revenue increased $4.3 million, or 2%, to $177.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2002 from $172.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2001. However, our gross margin improved to 25.4% for the year ended December 31, 2002, from 10.2% for the year ended December 31, 2001. This improvement in gross margin was due primarily to operational efficiency programs we implemented that led to a reduction in both the average material cost per product and the level of price protection expenses paid to our channel partners. This improvement in gross margin was partially offset by an increase in air freight expenses.

          Operating Expenses

      Research and development. Research and development expenses increased $2.9 million, or 66%, to $7.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2002, from $4.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2001. This increase was primarily due to increased headcount and salary increases for existing employees of $1.8 million, an increase in costs associated with outsourced engineering of $1.3 million, and an increase in certification expenses paid to third parties of $440,000. These increases were offset by the absence in 2002 of a charge of $645,000 associated with the discontinuation of a product development project in 2001.

      Sales and marketing. Sales and marketing expenses increased $8.4 million, or 34%, to $32.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2002, from $24.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2001. This increase was primarily due to increased salary and related expenses for additional sales and marketing

27



Table of Contents

personnel and increased compensation for existing personnel of $4.8 million, and increased product promotion, advertising and outside technical support expenses of $3.6 million.

      General and administrative. General and administrative expenses increased $2.2 million, or 37%, to $8.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2002, from $5.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2001. This increase was primarily due to increased salary expenses of $1.6 million for additional employees and increased compensation expenses for existing personnel, and $285,000 related to depreciation expense and bad debt allowance.

      Goodwill amortization. Goodwill amortization expenses decreased to zero for the year ended December 31, 2002, from $335,000 for the year ended December 31, 2001 due to the discontinuation of goodwill amortization under SFAS 142 effective January 1, 2002.

      Amortization of deferred stock-based compensation. During the year ended December 31, 2002, we recorded amortization of deferred stock-based compensation in cost of revenue of $144,000, $306,000 in research and development expenses, $346,000 in sales and marketing expenses, and $867,000 in general and administrative expenses.

          Other Income (Expense), Net

      Other expense, net remained approximately the same at $1.1 million for both the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2001. During these periods, an increase in interest expense of $301,000 primarily due to imputed interest associated with the Nortel note payable offset by a reduction in foreign exchange losses of $470,000 due to a decline in the value of the Japanese yen and other foreign currencies as compared to the United States dollar.

          Provision for Income Taxes

      Provision for income taxes decreased by $1.7 million from $3.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2001 to $1.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2002. This decrease occurred because we were able to reduce taxable income by utilizing almost all of our approximately $7.7 million of federal net operating loss carry forwards.

          Net Income (Loss)

      Net income was $8.1 million in 2002 versus a net loss of $19.5 million in 2001. This improvement of $27.6 million was due to an increase in gross profit of $40.6 million, offset by an increase in operating expenses of $14.7 million. Net income was also higher in 2002 due to a reduction in provision for income taxes of $1.7 million.

28



Table of Contents

Selected Quarterly Results

      The following tables set forth our unaudited consolidated results of operations for each of our last eight quarters in dollars and as a percentage of our net revenue. In the opinion of our management, this unaudited quarterly information has been prepared on a basis consistent with our audited financial statements and includes all adjustments, consisting of normal and recurring adjustments, that management considers necessary for a fair presentation of the data. These quarterly results are not necessarily indicative of future quarterly patterns or future patterns or results. This information should be read in conjunction with our financial statements and the related notes included elsewhere in this prospectus.

                                                                       
Three Months Ended (unaudited)


March 31, June 30, Sept 29, Dec 31, March 30, June 29, Sept 28, Dec 31,
2002 2002 2002 2002 2003 2003 2003 2003








(in thousands, except per share data)
Net revenue
  $ 45,528     $ 55,538     $ 64,362     $ 71,903     $ 67,706     $ 69,003     $ 75,785     $ 86,808  
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
 
Cost of revenue:
                                                               
 
Cost of revenue
    34,685       41,326       48,188       52,773       49,246       49,889       54,691       61,506  
 
Amortization (recovery) of deferred stock-based compensation
    66       20       22       36       (11 )     42       46       51  
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
 
     
Total cost of revenue
    34,751       41,346       48,210       52,809       49,235       49,931       54,737       61,557  
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
 
Gross profit
    10,777       14,192       16,152       19,094       18,471       19,072       21,048       25,251  
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
 
Operating expenses:
                                                               
 
Research and development
    894       1,606       2,378       2,481       2,016       1,882       2,079       2,243  
 
Sales and marketing
    7,180       7,809       8,456       9,177       10,961       11,706       12,419       13,877  
 
General and administrative
    1,528       2,024       2,113       2,438       1,902       1,779       2,356       2,940  
 
Amortization of deferred stock-based compensation:
                                                               
   
Research and development
    143       37       51       75       96       103       135       120  
   
Sales and marketing
    143       45       59       99       109       179       227       200  
   
General and administrative
    200       167       130       370       151       98       108       119  
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
 
     
Total operating expenses
    10,088       11,688       13,187       14,640       15,235       15,747       17,324       19,499  
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
 
Income from operations
    689       2,504       2,965       4,454       3,236       3,325       3,724       5,752  
Extinguishment of debt
                                        (5,868 )      
Other income (expense), net
    (65 )     (373 )     (234 )     (468 )     (411 )     (217 )     (142 )     174  
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
 
Income (loss) before taxes
    624       2,131       2,731       3,986       2,825       3,108       (2,286 )     5,926  
Provision for (benefit from) income taxes
    87       299       385       562       1,213       (8,395 )     1,664       1,994  
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
 
Net income (loss)
    537       1,832       2,346       3,424       1,612       11,503       (3,950 )     3,932  
Deemed dividend on Preferred Stock
    (17,881 )                                          
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
 
Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders
  $ (17,344 )   $ 1,832     $ 2,346     $ 3,424     $ 1,612     $ 11,503     $ (3,950 )   $ 3,932  
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
 
Net income (loss) per share attributable to common stockholders:
                                                               
Basic
  $ (0.72 )   $ 0.09     $ 0.12     $ 0.17     $ 0.08     $ 0.57     $ (0.15 )   $ 0.14  
Diluted
  $ (0.72 )   $ 0.09     $ 0.10     $ 0.15     $ 0.07     $ 0.48     $ (0.15 )   $ 0.12  

29



Table of Contents

                                                                       
As a Percentage of Net Revenue

March 31, June 30, Sept 29, Dec 31, March 30, June 29, Sept 28, Dec 31,
2002 2002 2002 2002 2003 2003 2003 2003








Net revenue
    100.0 %     100.0 %     100.0 %     100.0 %     100.0 %     100.0 %     100.0 %     100.0 %
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
 
Cost of revenue:
                                                               
 
Cost of revenue
    76.2       74.4       74.9       73.4       72.7       72.3       72.2       70.9  
Amortization (recovery) of deferred stock-based compensation
    0.1       0.0       0.0       0.0       (0.0 )     0.1       0.0       0.0  
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
 
     
Total cost of revenue
    76.3       74.4       74.9       73.4       72.7       72.4       72.2       70.9  
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
 
Gross margin
    23.7       25.6       25.1       26.6       27.3       27.6       27.8       29.1  
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
 
Operating expenses:
                                                               
 
Research and development
    2.0       2.9       3.7       3.5       3.0       2.7       2.7       2.6  
 
Sales and marketing
    15.8       14.1       13.1       12.8       16.2       17.0       16.4       16.0  
 
General and administrative
    3.4       3.6       3.3       3.4       2.8       2.6       3.1       3.4  
 
Goodwill amortization
                                               
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
 
 
Amortization of deferred stock-based compensation
                                                               
   
Research and development
    0.3       0.1       0.1       0.1       0.1       0.1       0.2       0.2  
   
Sales and marketing
    0.3       0.1       0.1       0.1       0.2       0.3       0.3       0.2  
   
General and administrative
    0.4       0.3       0.2       0.5       0.2       0.1       0.2       0.1  
     
Total operating expenses
    22.2       21.1       20.5       20.4       22.5       22.8       22.9       22.5  
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
 
Income from operations
    1.5       4.5       4.6       6.2       4.8       4.8       4.9       6.6  
Extinguishment of debt
                                        (7.8 )      
Other income (expense), net
    (0.1 )     (0.7 )     (0.4 )     (0.6 )     (0.6 )     (0.3 )     (0.1 )     0.2  
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
 
Income (loss) before taxes
    1.4       3.8       4.2       5.6       4.2       4.5       (3.0 )     6.8  
Provision for (benefit from) income taxes
    0.2       0.5       0.6       0.8       1.8       (12.2 )     2.2       2.3  
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
 
Net income (loss)
    1.2 %     3.3 %     3.6 %     4.8 %     2.4 %     16.7 %     (5.2 )%     4.5 %
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
 

      Our net revenue increased sequentially in each quarter between the quarter ended March 31, 2002 and the quarter ended December 31, 2003, except for the quarter ended March 30, 2003. The revenue growth was primarily due to the introduction of new products that gained rapid market acceptance, the addition of new retail outlets and increasing penetration of the EMEA market. The sequential decrease in revenue in the quarter ended March 30, 2003 was due to geo-political instability, timing of introduction of products by both us and our competitors, and traditional seasonal demand patterns.

      Our gross margin has increased sequentially in each quarter between the quarter ended March 31, 2002 and the quarter ended December 31, 2003, except for a slight decline in the quarter ended September 29, 2002. The increase in gross margin was primarily due to our ability to decrease product costs faster than the decline in average selling prices and the introduction of new products which often carry higher gross margins, partially offset by increases from inbound freight costs. The decrease in gross margin for the quarter ended September 29, 2002 was due primarily to increased cooperative marketing costs and price protection in that quarter.

      The amount of research and development expenses increased in the four quarters from the three months ended March 31, 2002, primarily due to additional headcount and salary increases for existing employees, as well as increases in payments to suppliers for design services and certification expenses paid to third parties. Research and development expenses declined slightly in the two quarters ended March 30, 2003 and June 29, 2003 due to reduced certification expenses and a reduction in payments to suppliers for design services. For the two quarters ended September 28, 2003 and December 31, 2003 the expenses again increased due to increased headcount and costs associated with the introduction of new products.

30



Table of Contents

      The amount of sales and marketing expenses increased in each of the eight quarters starting with the quarter ended March 31, 2002, due to increased product promotion, advertising and outside service expenses associated with growth in revenues, an increase in salary expenses for additional sales and marketing personnel, and compensation expenses for existing personnel. Sales and marketing expenses grew as a percentage of net revenue in the quarters ended March 30, 2003 and June 29, 2003 due to increases in headcount and technical support relating to geographic expansion as well as the timing and channel mix of marketing expenditures.

      The amount of general and administrative expenses have remained relatively constant during the quarters indicated above with a slight increase in recent quarters due to additional headcount and the associated costs that the company has to bear with becoming public.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

      As of December 31, 2003 we had cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments totaling $73.6 million. Short term investments accounted for $12.4 million of this balance.

      Our cash balance increased from $19.9 million as of December 31, 2002 to $61.2 million as of December 31, 2003. Operating activities during the year ended December 31, 2003 used $26.4 million, primarily for working capital to support the increase in our net revenue. Investing activities during the year ended December 31, 2003 used $14.9 million for the purchase of short-term investments and property and equipment. During the year ended December 31, 2003, financing activities provided $82.6 million, primarily resulting from the issuance of common stock in our initial public offering, partially offset by the repayment of a line of credit and the Nortel Note.

      Our days sales outstanding increased from 55 days as of December 31, 2002 to 81 days as of December 31, 2003. This increase was attributable primarily to channel mix in the fourth quarter of 2003 moving more towards retail, which generally has longer payment terms.

      Our accounts payable and payable to related parties, in aggregate, increased from $24.3 million at December 31, 2002 to $30.9 million at December 31, 2003. The increase of $6.6 million is due to the timing of inventory receipts. The shift of amounts payable between related party and third party accounts payable of approximately $7.3 million is due to the diversification of our contracting manufacturing base to more vendors.

      Inventory grew by $14.5 million from $24.8 million at December 31, 2002 to $39.3 million at December 31, 2003, to support increased product shipments to customers. The primary areas of growth were finished goods at $6.7 million and in-transit inventory at $7.3 million. In the quarter ended December 31, 2003 we experienced inventory turns of approximately 6.3 times, down from approximately 8.5 times in the quarter ended December 31, 2002.

      Our cash balance increased from $9.2 million as of December 31, 2001 to $19.9 million as of December 31, 2002. Operating activities during 2002 provided cash of $15.2 million primarily from net income of $8.1 million, non-cash items of $4.2 million and contribution from working capital of $2.8 million. This increase was attributable primarily to an increase in the amount of our net revenues occurring during the last month of the quarter ended December 31, 2002 compared to the last month of the quarter ended December 31, 2001. Investing activities for this period used $3.2 million due to purchases of property and equipment. Financing activities for this period used cash of $1.2 million due to issuance costs of $1.2 million associated with the repurchase of our Series A preferred stock offset by proceeds from the issuance of our Series C preferred stock.

      We have a revolving line of credit agreement with Comerica Bank-California that provides for a maximum line of credit of $20.0 million, which includes direct loans, letters of credit, foreign exchange contracts, and corporate credit cards. Availability under this line of credit is based on a formula of eligible accounts receivable balances. Direct borrowings bear interest at the bank’s prime rate plus 75 basis points. Borrowings are collateralized by all of our assets. The credit line contains covenants, including but not limited to certain financial covenants based on earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization,

31



Table of Contents

or EBITDA, and tangible net worth, and does not allow for declaration of dividends. We are not required to maintain compensating balances, however, we are required to pay a fee of 0.25% per annum on the unused portion of the total facility and 1.50% per annum for letters of credit. During 2002 we borrowed amounts under this line of credit for working capital purposes. As of December 31, 2003, all amounts borrowed under this credit line had been repaid, but letters of credit in the aggregate amount of $350,000 were outstanding, leaving approximately $19.6 million available for borrowing under this line of credit.

      Based on our current plans and market conditions, we believe that our existing cash and our credit facility will be sufficient to satisfy our anticipated cash requirements for at least the next twelve months. However, we cannot be certain that our planned levels of revenue, costs and expenses will be achieved. If our operating results fail to meet our expectations or if we fail to manage our inventory, accounts receivable or other assets, we could be required to seek additional funding through public or private financings or other arrangements. In addition, as we continue to expand our product offerings, channels and geographic presence, we may require additional working capital. In such event, adequate funds may not be available when needed or may not be available on favorable or commercially acceptable terms, which could have a negative effect on our business and results of operations.

Backlog

      As of December 31, 2003, we had a backlog of approximately $11.5 million compared to approximately $9.9 million as of December 31, 2002. Our backlog consists of products for which customer purchase orders have been received and which are scheduled or in the process of being scheduled for shipment. While we expect to fulfill the order backlog within the current year, most orders are subject to rescheduling or cancellation with little or no penalties. Because of the possibility of customer changes in product scheduling or order cancellation, our backlog as of any particular date may not be an indicator of net sales for any succeeding period.

Contractual Obligations and Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

      The following table describes our commitments to settle contractual obligations in cash and our off-balance sheet arrangements as of December 31, 2003.

                                         
Payments Due By Period

Less than 1-3 3-5 More than
1 year years years 5 years Total





(in thousands)
Operating leases
  $ 1,033     $ 179                 $ 1,212  
Non-cancelable purchase obligations
    27,528                         27,528  
     
     
     
     
     
 
    $ 28,561     $ 179                 $ 28,740  
     
     
     
     
     
 

      We lease office space and equipment under non-cancelable operating leases with various expiration dates through March 2006. Rent expense was $1.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2001, $959,000 for the year ended December 31, 2002 and $1.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2003. The terms of the facility lease provide for rental payments on a graduated scale. We recognize rent expense on a straight-line basis over the lease period, and have accrued for rent expense incurred but not paid.

      We enter into various inventory-related purchase agreements with suppliers. Generally, under these agreements, 50% of the orders are cancelable by giving notice 46 to 60 days prior to the expected shipment date and 25% of orders are cancellable by giving notice 31-45 days prior to the expected shipment date. Orders are non cancellable within 30 days prior to the expected shipment date. At December 31, 2003, we had approximately $27.5 million in non-cancelable purchase commitments with suppliers.

International Restructuring

      By the end of 2004, we plan to reorganize our foreign subsidiaries and entities to manage and optimize our international operations. This project will require us to form and develop new corporate entities and

32



Table of Contents

implement intercompany charging structures in our sales order, purchase order, inventory, accounts receivable, accounts payable and other modules. We plan to reconfigure our management information systems in order to support these new foreign and other corporate entities. As part of the restructuring, we must amend a number of our customer and supplier agreements, which will require the consent of our third-party customers and suppliers. The restructuring will require substantial efforts by our staff as we modify our organizational structure and add personnel to support new business processes and reporting between us and these new entities. Therefore, the restructuring will result in increased staffing requirements and related expenses. In addition, we may be unable to implement successfully the changes required to support and obtain the benefits of the new structure. We cannot assure you that the restructuring will not cause unanticipated interruptions to our business operations that result in loss or delay in revenue causing a material adverse effect on our financial results. Failure to successfully execute the restructuring or other factors outside our control could negatively impact the timing and extent of any benefit we receive from the restructuring. See “Risk Factors — We intend to implement an international restructuring, which may strain our resources and increase our operating expenses.”

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

      The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. On an ongoing basis, we evaluate significant estimates used in preparing our financial statements including those related to sales returns and allowances; bad debt; inventory reserves; vendor rebates and deferred taxes. We base our estimates on historical experience, underlying run rates and various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities. Actual results could differ from these estimates. The following are critical judgments, assumptions, and estimates used in the preparation of the consolidated financial statements.

 
Revenue Recognition

      Revenue from product sales is generally recognized at the time the product is shipped, provided that persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, title and risk of loss has transferred to the customer, the sales price is fixed or determinable and collection of the related receivable is reasonably assured. Currently, for our international customers, title passes upon delivery to the port of destination and for select retailers in the United States to whom we sell directly title passes upon their receipt of product. At the end of each quarter, we estimate and defer revenue related to the product that is in-transit to international customers and retail customers in the United States that purchase direct from us based upon title passage. We use an estimated number of days based on historical transit periods for different geographies to estimate the amount of revenue to be deferred. In addition, we monitor distributor and reseller channel inventory levels to identify any excess inventory in the channel that may be subject to stock rotation rights for US customers only. Gross revenue is reduced for estimated returns for stock rotation and warranty, price protection programs, customer rebates and cooperative marketing expenses deemed to be a sales incentive under Emerging Issues Task Force, or EITF, Issue 01-9, to derive net revenue.

      At the time of each sales transaction, we assess whether collection of the receivable is reasonably assured. We assess collectibility and creditworthiness of our customer’s based on a number of factors, including past transaction history; independent reports from recognized credit rating bureaus, financial statements of the customer and where appropriate, interviews and discussions held with senior financial management of the customer. We do not request collateral from our customers. If we determine that collection is not reasonably assured, we defer revenue until receipt of cash.

      Material differences may result in the amount and timing of our revenue for any period if our management made different judgments and estimates.

      Prior to January 1, 2001, revenue on shipments to domestic distributors was deferred until resale to end-users because we could not reasonably estimate the amount of future returns. Revenue on all shipments to

33



Table of Contents

international distributors was recognized upon cash collection, as the company had not established a history of collection with foreign distributors. In 2001, we determined that we had accumulated sufficient historical evidence with respect to returns and cash collections with our distributors to enable us to make reasonable estimates for all shipments on or after January 1, 2001.
 
Allowances for Returns due to Stock Rotation and Warranty, Price Protection Programs, Other Sales Incentives and Doubtful Accounts

      Management makes estimates of potential future product returns, price protection claims and other sales incentives related to current period revenue. Such estimates are based on historical returns or claims rates, channel inventory levels, current economic trends and changes in customer demand and acceptance of our products. Material differences may result in the amount and timing of our revenue for any period if our management made different judgments and estimates.

      We evaluate our ability to collect our receivables based on a combination of factors. We regularly analyze our significant customer accounts, and, when we become aware of a specific customer’s inability to meet its financial obligations to us, such as in the case of bankruptcy filings or deterioration in the customer’s operating results or financial position, we record a specific allowance for bad debt to reduce the related receivable to the amount we reasonably believe is collectible. We also record allowances for bad debt for all other customers based on a variety of factors including the length of time the receivables are past due, the financial health of the customer, macroeconomic considerations and historical experience. If circumstances related to specific customers change, our estimates of the recoverability of receivables could be further adjusted.

      As of December 31, 2003, we have provided allowances for a total of $1.3 million for doubtful accounts, $2.6 million for price protection, and $4.8 million for sales returns. After applying these allowances to our gross accounts receivable balance of $83.6 million, we had $74.9 million in net accounts receivable outstanding as of December 31, 2003.

 
Valuation of Inventory

      We value our inventory at the lower of cost or market, cost being determined using the first-in, first-out method. We continually assess the value of our inventory and will periodically write down its value for estimated excess and obsolete inventory based upon assumptions about future demand and market conditions. On a quarterly basis, we review inventory quantities on hand and on order, under non-cancelable purchase commitments, in comparison to our estimated forecast of product demand for the next nine months. As demonstrated during 2001, 2002 and 2003 demand for our products can fluctuate significantly. If actual demand is lower than our forecasted demand we could be required to record additional inventory write-downs, which would have a negative effect on our gross margin.

 
Income Taxes

      As part of the process of preparing our consolidated financial statements we are required to estimate our taxes in each of the jurisdictions in which we operate. This process involves us estimating our actual current tax exposure together with assessing temporary differences resulting from differing treatment of items, such as accruals and allowances not currently deductible for tax purposes. We must then assess the likelihood that our deferred tax assets will be recovered from future taxable income and to the extent we believe that recovery is not likely, we must establish a valuation allowance.

      Management judgment is required in determining our provision for income taxes, our deferred tax assets and liabilities and any valuation allowance recorded against our net deferred tax assets. We have recorded a full valuation allowance as of December 31, 2001 and 2002, because, based on the available evidence, we believed at that time it was more likely than not that we would not be able to utilize all of our deferred tax assets in the future. During the year ended December 31, 2003 we reversed $9.8 million from the valuation allowance because in management’s judgment it is more likely than not that such assets will be realized in the future.

34



Table of Contents

     Stock-based Compensation

      Our stock-based employee compensation plans are described more fully in Note 10 to the consolidated financial statements. We account for those plans under the recognition and measurement principles of Accounting Principles Board, or APB, Opinion No. 25 and related interpretations. We amortize stock-based compensation using the straight-line method over the vesting periods of the related options, which are generally four years.

      We have recorded deferred stock-based compensation representing the difference between the deemed fair value of our common stock for accounting purposes and the option exercise price. We determined the deemed fair value of our common stock based upon several factors, including a valuation report from an independent appraiser, trends in the broad market for technology stocks and the expected valuation we would obtain in an initial public offering. We recorded deferred stock-based compensation of $6.7 million and $1.0 million for stock options granted to employees during the years ended December 31, 2002, and 2003, respectively. We amortized $1.7 million and $1.8 million of this amount in the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2003, respectively. Had different assumptions or criteria been used to determine the deemed fair value of our common stock, materially different amounts of stock-based compensation could have been reported.

      Pro forma information regarding net income (loss) and net income (loss) per share is required in order to show our net income (loss) as if we had accounted for employee stock options under the fair value method of SFAS No. 123, as amended by SFAS No. 148. This information is contained in Note 1 to our consolidated financial statements. The fair value of options and shares issued pursuant to our option plans at the grant date were estimated using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. This model was developed for use in estimating the fair value of traded options that have no vesting restrictions and are fully transferable. In addition, option-pricing models require the input of highly subjective assumptions including the expected stock price volatility. We use projected volatility rates, which are based upon historical volatility rates experienced by comparable public companies. Because our employee stock options have characteristics significantly different from those of publicly traded options, and because changes in the subjective input assumptions can materially affect the fair value estimate, in management’s opinion, the existing models do not necessarily provide a reliable single measure of the fair value of our stock options.

      The effects of applying pro forma disclosures of net income (loss) and net income (loss) per share are not likely to be representative of the pro forma effects on net income and earnings per share in the future years for the following reasons: (1) the number of future shares to be issued under these plans is not known and (2) the assumptions used to determine the fair value can vary significantly.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure Regarding Market Risk

      We do not use derivative financial instruments in our investment portfolio. We have an investment portfolio of fixed income securities that are classified as “available-for-sale securities.” These securities, like all fixed income instruments, are subject to interest rate risk and will fall in value if market interest rates increase. We attempt to limit this exposure by investing primarily in short-term securities. Due to the short duration and conservative nature of our investment portfolio a movement of 10% by market interest rates would not have a material impact on our operating results and the total value of the portfolio over the next fiscal year.

      We are exposed to risks associated with foreign exchange rate fluctuations due to our international manufacturing and sales activities. We generally have not hedged currency exposures. These exposures may change over time as business practices evolve and could negatively impact our operating results and financial condition. All of our sales are denominated in U.S. dollars. An increase in the value of the U.S. dollar relative to foreign currencies could make our products more expensive and therefore reduce the demand for our products. Such a decline in the demand could reduce sales and/or result in operating losses.

35



Table of Contents

Related Party Transactions

      For a description of our related party transactions, see “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions.”

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

      In November 2002, the EITF reached a consensus on Issue 00-21, “Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables.” EITF Issue 00-21 provides guidance on how to account for arrangements that involve the delivery or performance of multiple products, services and/or rights to use assets. The provisions of EITF Issue 00-21 applies to revenue arrangements entered into in reporting periods beginning after June 15, 2003. The adoption of EITF Issue 00-21 did not have a material impact on the financial position, results of operations or cash flows of the company.

      In December 2003, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued a revision to Interpretation number 46, “Consolidation of variable interest entities, and interpretation of ARB Opinion No. 51 (FIN 46R).” FIN 46R clarifies the application of ARB 51 “Consolidated Financial Statements,” to certain entities in which equity investors do not have the characteristics of a controlling financial interest or do not have sufficient equity at risk for the entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support provided by any parties, including the equity holders. FIN 46R requires the consolidation of these entities, known as variable interest entities (“VIE’s”), by the primary beneficiary of the entity. The primary beneficiary is the entity, if any, that will absorb a majority of the entity’s expected losses, receive a majority of the entity’s expected residual returns, or both.

      Among other changes, the revisions of FIN 46R (a) clarified some requirements of the original FIN 46, which had been issued in January 2003, (b) eased some implementation problems, and (c) added new scope exceptions. FIN 46R deferred the effective date of the interpretation for public companies to the end of the first reporting period ending after March 15, 2004, except that all public companies must at a minimum apply the unmodified provisions of the interpretation to entities that were previously considered “special-purpose entities” in practice and under the FASB literature prior to the issuance of FIN 46R by the end of the first reporting period ending after December 15, 2003.

      Among the scope expectations, companies are not required to apply FIN 46R to an entity that meets the criteria to be considered a “business” as defined in the interpretation unless one or more of four named conditions exist. FIN 46R applies immediately to a VIE created or acquired after January 31, 2003. The company does not have any interests in VIE’s and the adoption of FIN 46R is not expected to have a material impact on the company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

Change in Auditors

      Deloitte & Touche LLP previously served as our independent accountants as well as the independent accountants for our prior parent Nortel Networks. In February 2002, concurrent with Nortel Networks selling its remaining ownership of our capital stock, we changed from Deloitte & Touche to PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent auditors. Our board of directors approved the decision to change accountants.

      In connection with the audit of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2000, we had no disagreements with Deloitte & Touche LLP on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statements disclosure, or auditing scope or procedures, which disagreements if not resolved to their satisfaction would have caused Deloitte & Touche LLP to make reference in connection with their opinion to the subject matter of the disagreement.

      The audit report of Deloitte & Touche LLP on our consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2000, did not contain any adverse opinion or disclaimer of opinion, nor were they qualified or modified as to uncertainty, audit scope, or accounting principles.

36



Table of Contents

Principal Accountant Fees and Services

      Total fees billed by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP for the audits of our financial statements and other services during the year ended December 31, 2003 amounted to $1,105,000. Of this amount, $873,000 was related to professional services provided as part of our initial public offering.

      The aggregate fees for tax compliance and tax advisory services billed by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP during the year ended December 31, 2003 were $313,000.

      During the year ended December 31, 2003, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP rendered no other services for us.

37



Table of Contents

BUSINESS

General

      We design, develop and market technologically advanced, branded networking products that address the specific needs of small business, which we define as a business with fewer than 250 employees, and home users. We supply innovative networking products that meet the ease-of-use, quality, reliability, performance and affordability requirements of these users. Our broad suite of approximately 100 products enables users to share Internet access, peripherals, files, digital multimedia content and applications among multiple personal computers, or PCs, and other Internet-enabled devices. Our products are grouped into three major segments within the small business and home markets: Ethernet networking products, broadband products and wireless networking products, with each product group including a combination of switches, adapters, and wired and wireless routers and gateways. We sell our products primarily through a global sales channel network, which includes traditional retailers with over 7,100 locations worldwide, online retailers, direct market resellers, or DMRs, value added resellers, or VARs, and broadband service providers.

Industry Background

      A number of factors are driving today’s increasing demand for networking products within small businesses and homes. As the number of computing devices, such as PCs, has increased in recent years, networks are being deployed in order to share information and resources among users and devices. This information and resource sharing occurs internally, through a local area network, or LAN, or externally, via the Internet. To take advantage of complex applications, advanced communication capabilities and rich multimedia content, users are upgrading their Internet connections by deploying high-speed broadband access technologies. Users also seek the convenience and flexibility of operating their PCs, laptops and related computing devices in a more mobile, or wireless, manner. Finally, as the usage of networks, including the Internet, has increased, users have become much more focused on the security of their connections and the protection of the data within their networks.

      The number of PCs within small businesses and homes is increasing due to the increased affordability and capabilities of these devices. Small businesses and homes are deploying multiple PCs within these environments. According to International Data Corporation, or IDC, at the end of 2002, 69% of U.S. businesses with less than 100 employees have multiple PCs, while only 32% have deployed networks. As the number of PCs has grown and users have become more familiar with and dependent upon their capabilities, users are seeking networks that enable them to share devices (printers and storage), access data and rich content (pictures, music and video files), leverage collaborative applications (email and instant messaging) and share Internet access. Furthermore, home users desire the ability to play digital audio and video content stored on a PC or the Internet, on consumer electronic devices like stereos, home theatres and TVs. In addition, demand is growing for the ability to make low cost, feature-rich telephone calls using Internet protocol, a technology known as voice-over-IP.

      As small business and home users increasingly need to access and interact with bandwidth intensive files and applications, they are demanding an upgrade from dial-up connections to broadband connections, using cable or digital subscriber line, or DSL, modems, which enable Internet access at speeds up to 20 times faster than dial-up modems. Broadband Internet access services have become increasingly affordable and available, thereby fueling penetration of these services. According to IDC, the number of DSL and cable modem broadband Internet connections worldwide is expected to increase from 58.6 million in 2002 to 183.9 million in 2006, reflecting a compound annual growth rate of 33%. Increasingly, networking products are being deployed within small businesses and homes in order to share these high-speed Internet connections among multiple users and devices.

      As wireless technologies have become more prevalent, cost-efficient and easy-to-use and install, small business and home users increasingly value the flexibility to wirelessly access and interact with their networks, including the Internet. For small businesses or homes, wireless LANs provide mobility for users and can be an affordable alternative to a wired network. Users are also able to utilize their notebook computers to access networks from a variety of locations, including their homes, offices and various other

38



Table of Contents

‘hot spot’ locations, such as airports, cafes and university campuses. The adoption of industry standards for wireless LAN communications has helped spur the proliferation of a variety of wireless products for both the small business and home markets. Cahners’ In-Stat/ MDR estimates that the total number of worldwide shipments of wireless LAN equipment, including both network interface cards, or NICs, access points and digital media adapters, will grow from 49.0 million in 2003 to 123.8 million in 2006, reflecting a compound annual growth rate of 36%.

      With the proliferation of networks, maintaining the security of information and protecting the privacy of communication becomes essential to both small business and home users alike. Unlike the private dedicated communication networks of past decades, which were relatively secure from intruders, the Internet and networks connected to it are increasingly susceptible to security threats. In recent years, there has been a heightened awareness of the need to protect against breaches of network security. Accordingly, there has been an increase in the demand for security related products, or the integration of security features into networking products such as Internet routers and wireless networking equipment, to protect information on networks and to limit the usage of networks only to authorized individuals. Networking products for the small business and home markets are primarily classified into three broad categories:

           Ethernet networking products, including switches (multiple port devices used to network PCs and peripherals), NICs or network adapters, and bridges (devices that connect PCs and other equipment to a network), and peripheral servers such as print servers (devices that manage printing on a network).

           Broadband products, including routers (intelligent devices used to connect two networks together, such as a local area network and the Internet), gateways (a router with an integrated modem for Internet access), and products that include an integrated wireless access point such as a wireless gateway.

           Wireless networking products, including access points (devices that provide a wireless link between the wired network and wireless devices) and wireless NICs or network adapters, and media adapters and bridges (devices that wirelessly connect PCs, stereos, TVs and other equipment to a network).

      A small business network can consist of:

  •  multiple PCs;
 
  •  peripherals such as printers and storage devices;
 
  •  a network connection device such as a router, which often includes security functionality;
 
  •  a wired or wireless network adapter for each personal computer; and
 
  •  a central network controller such as a switch.

      A home network can consist of:

  •  one or more PCs and possibly consumer electronic devices to be networked;
 
  •  peripherals such as printers and scanners;
 
  •  Internet access devices such as a router or a gateway;
 
  •  a wired or wireless network adapter for each personal computer; and
 
  •  a “bridge”, or a media adapter, that connects consumer electronic device such as game consoles, TVs, stereos, and telephones.

      Within both the small business and home markets, devices are typically linked together through Ethernet cables or, increasingly, wireless connections. In-home power lines can also be used to transmit data among components to form a home network.

      Small business and home users demand a complete set of wired and wireless networking and broadband solutions that are tailored to their specific needs and budgets and also incorporate the latest networking technologies. These users require the continual introduction of new and refined products. Small business and home users often lack extensive IT resources and technical knowledge and therefore demand ‘plug-and-play’

39



Table of Contents

or easy-to-install and use solutions. These users demand reliable products that require little or no maintenance, and are supported by effective technical support and customer service. We believe that these users also prefer the convenience of obtaining a networking solution from a single company with whom they are familiar; as these users expand their networks, they tend to be loyal purchasers of that brand. In addition, purchasing decisions of users in the small business and home markets are also driven by the affordability of networking products. To provide reliable, easy-to-use products at an attractive price, we believe a successful supplier must have a company-wide focus on the unique requirements of this market and the operational discipline and cost-efficient company infrastructure and processes that allow for efficient product development, manufacturing and distribution.

Our Strategy

      Our objective is to be the leading provider of innovative networking products that address the needs of the small business and home markets. The following are key elements of our strategy:

      Be first to market with innovative products. We believe that our experience in the small business and home markets, along with our access to technology road maps through our relationships with leading semiconductor and software companies, enable us to quickly introduce innovative products to the market. We intend to strengthen current relationships and forge new relationships with emerging suppliers of software and semiconductor technology. We intend to continue to invest in internal research and development activities designed to enhance our products to satisfy the wide range of evolving networking requirements in small businesses and homes. We plan to further broaden our product portfolio into new areas that will complement our current product offerings while leveraging our brand, channel presence and operational efficiency. For example, we believe our recent introduction of 108 Mbps 802.11g wireless products address an important market opportunity.

      Expand and enhance our sales channels. We believe that the most effective way to sell networking products to the small business and home markets is through a diverse worldwide set of traditional retailers, online retailers, DMRs, VARs and broadband service providers. We plan to expand relationships with our retail network, and continue to add new resellers. For example, in 2003 we began selling our products in North America at such retailers as Microcenter and Office Depot and at international retailers such as Legend Group (China) and PC Specialist (Germany). In addition, we have recently entered into an agreement with Softbank BB Corp. for the exclusive distribution of our products in Japan. Similarly, we intend to continue to work closely with the VAR channel, by expanding the number of our relationships as well as developing products specifically addressing their customers’ needs. We are increasingly developing and enhancing relationships with broadband service providers in North America and internationally and have, as an example, begun reselling our products through Time-Warner Cable and Comcast in the United States, Telstra in Australia and Tele Denmark. We intend to continue these initiatives and expect to pursue similar relationships with broadband service providers in the future.

      Extend our geographic presence. We believe that one of our most significant competitive advantages is our global presence. We derive substantial revenue from each of the North American, EMEA and Asia Pacific markets. In 2003, 42% of our net revenue was generated from international sales. We view several international markets as opportunities for continued significant growth for our business. We have recently entered the Chinese market by establishing sales offices which serve the local retailers and VARs. We intend to continue to expand our geographic presence by targeting emerging and growing markets, such as China and India, either through direct investment or teaming with existing local companies. In addition, we plan to leverage our success in European countries, such as Italy, that are experiencing growing demand for networking products. From time to time, we may also consider acquisitions, strategic alliances or joint ventures to increase our penetration in identified markets.

      Expand our marketing initiatives. NETGEAR is one of the most widely recognized brands in the small business and home networking markets, known for affordable, reliable and easy-to-use products. We believe that the purchasing decisions of small business and home users are influenced by brand recognition. Consequently, we have made significant investments to establish the NETGEAR brand, our GearGuy logo and

40



Table of Contents

the consistent and recognizable design of our products. We intend to continue building our brand identity through product design, packaging, public relations, advertising campaigns and other marketing efforts.

      Enhance operational efficiencies. We believe one of the keys to our success in operating a profitable business within the small business and home networking markets has been our ability to control operational costs while continuing to provide first-to-market, innovative products. We have implemented processes to manage product development efficiency, inventory and channel costs, and overall operating expenses. We plan to continue to invest in personnel, technology and processes to enhance our operational discipline and efficiencies with respect to product development, manufacturing, demand assessment and supply chain and channel inventory management. By focusing on operational efficiencies, we intend to continue to meet the demands of our target markets for affordable, high quality products while maintaining a profitable business model.

Products

      Our extensive product line currently includes approximately 100 different products. These products are available in multiple configurations to address the needs of our customers in each geographic region in which our products are sold. Our Ethernet networking products have historically generated a majority of our net revenue. However, in recent periods, the percentage of our net revenue attributable to broadband and wireless networking products has increased. Our products target the following three major segments within the small business and home markets:

  •  Ethernet networking products, including switches, NICs or adapters, bridges and print servers;
 
  •  broadband products, including wired and wireless routers and gateways; and
 
  •  wireless networking products, including access points, wireless NICs or adapters, and media adapters and bridges.

41



Table of Contents

      The following table identifies our principal products as of December 31, 2003:

         

SMALL BUSINESS HOME


ETHERNET
NETWORKING
PRODUCTS
  Switches
• 10/100 megabits per second (Mbps) using copper cables
• 10/100/1000 Mbps using copper or fiber cables
• 10/100/1000 Mbps Stackable using copper or fiber cables
• 10/100/1000 Mbps Managed using copper or fiber cables
• 10/100 Mbps Managed Layer 3 Power over Ethernet using copper or fiber cables
• 10/100/1000 Mbps Managed Layer 3 using copper or fiber cables
  Switches
• 10/100 Mbps Platinum Series using copper cables

Bridges
• 14 Mbps Wall-Plugged Ethernet Bridge
 
    NICs
• 10/100 Mbps Peripheral Component Interconnect (PCI) NIC
• 10/100 Mbps PC Card NIC
• 10/100 Mbps Ethernet Universal Serial Bus (USB) NIC
• 1000 Mbps PCI
  NICs
• 10/100 Mbps PCI NIC
• 10/100 Mbps PC Card NIC
• 10/100 Mbps Ethernet USB NIC
• 10/100/1000 Mbps PCI NIC
    Servers   Servers
    • Print Servers   • Print Servers


BROADBAND
PRODUCTS
  Routers
• Ethernet Cable/DSL Router with Printer Server
• Ethernet Cable/DSL ProSafe Virtual Private Network (VPN) Firewall Router
• ProSafe 802.11g Wireless Firewall with USB Print Server
• ProSafe Dual Band Wireless 802.11a/b/g Wireless VPN Firewall
• ProSafe VPN client software
  Routers/Gateways
• Ethernet DSL Modem with USB Port
• Ethernet Cable Modem Gateway
• Ethernet DSL Modem Gateway
• Ethernet Cable/DSL Web Safe Router
• Wireless 802.11g DSL Modem Gateway
• Wireless 802.11b Cable/DSL Router
• Wireless 802.11b Cable Modem Gateway
• Wireless 802.11g Cable Modem Gateway
• Wireless 802.11g Cable/DSL Router
• Wireless 108 Mbps 802.11g Cable/DSL Router
• Wireless 108 Mbps 802.11g Cable/DSL Router with disc sharing controller

    Access Points   Bridges

WIRELESS
NETWORKING
PRODUCTS
  • ProSafe 802.11g Wireless Access Point
• 18 dBi Patch Panel Directional Antenna
• 5 dBi Omni-directional Antenna
NICs
• 802.11a/g Dual Band Wireless PCI NIC
• 802.11a/g Dual Band Wireless PC Card NIC
  • 802.11b Wireless Bridge
• 802.11g Wireless Bridge
• 802.11b Wireless Bridge for home audio devices, or Digital Music Player

NICs
• 802.11b Wireless USB NIC
• 802.11b Wireless PCI NIC
• 802.11b Wireless PC Card NIC
• 802.11b Compact Flash NIC
• 802.11b Wireless Digital Music Player
• 802.11g Wireless USB NIC
• 802.11g Wireless PC Card NIC
• 108 Mbps 802.11g Wireless PC Card NIC
• 108 Mbps 802.11g Wireless PCI NIC

42



Table of Contents

      We customize our products to meet the specific needs of both the small business and home markets, tailoring various elements of the product design, including component specification, physical characteristics such as casing, design and coloration, and specific hardware and software features to meet the needs of these markets. However, we leverage many of our technological developments, high volume manufacturing, technical support and engineering infrastructure across both markets to maximize business efficiencies.

      Our small business products are designed with an industrial appearance, including metal cases, and for some product categories, the ability to mount the product within standard data networking racks. These products typically include higher port counts, higher data transfer rates and other performance characteristics designed to meet the needs of a small business user. For example, we offer data transfer rates up to one Gigabit per second for our business products to meet the higher capacity requirements of business users. These products are also designed to support transmission modes such as fiber optic cabling, which is common in more sophisticated business environments. Security requirements within our broadband products include firewall and virtual private network capabilities that allow for secure interactions between remote offices and business headquarter locations. Our wireless product offerings for the small business market include higher transfer rates as well as enhanced security capabilities often required in a business setting.

      Our current development efforts for Ethernet networking products for the small business market include expanding our network management capabilities such as Layer 3 managed switching functionality, as well as offering higher port counts and densities for Fast Ethernet and Gigabit products to support the needs of growing small business customers. For our broadband products in the small business market, we plan to continue enhancing the capabilities of our routers with advanced firewall and virtual private network capabilities and to permit voice calls over the Internet. We expect that these capabilities will be offered in both traditional copper cabling as well as wireless connectivity modes including 802.11b, dual-mode 802.11b/g and tri-mode 802.11a/b/g. Developments in the wireless networking product area include additional 802.11b/g and tri-mode 802.11a/b/g capabilities for access points and NICs, offering advanced speeds, security and backward compatibility.

      Our home products are designed with pleasing visual and physical aesthetics that are more desirable in a home environment. For example, products featuring our Platinum series physical designs have a silver/gray coloring and lighter plastic casings to appeal to home users. Our Ethernet products for the home market use a lower cost electrical component design and contain lower port counts to meet the increased price sensitivity and specific data networking requirements of home consumers. Our wireless offerings in the home support sufficient data transfer rates for most home user applications, but at a lower price than higher capacity wireless offerings for the small business market. Our broadband products are available with features such as parental control capabilities and firewall security, to allow for safer, more controlled Internet usage in families with children. Our broadband products designed for the home market also contain advanced installation software that guides a less sophisticated data networking user through the installation process with their broadband service provider, using a graphical user interface and simple point and click operations. Our home product offerings include wall-plug data transmission modes which allow home users to take advantage of their existing electrical wiring infrastructure for transmitting data among network components.

      We are developing a substantial number of new product offerings for the home market. Our current development efforts for Ethernet networking products include expanding our product lines using in-home power lines to form a network, low cost Gigabit Ethernet NICs, and engineering redesigns to allow for price and cost reductions in our switch line. For our broadband products, we plan to expand our portfolio of wired and wireless gateways with integrated asynchronous DSL and cable modem capabilities, with enhanced ease-of-setup installation and ease-of-use capabilities. We expect these capabilities will be offered in both traditional copper cabling as well as 802.11b, and 802.11g wireless connectivity modes. Our development efforts in the wireless networking product area include expanding our line of 802.11g access points, routers and gateways, NICs and bridges with faster speeds, expanded range and enhanced security. Other developments include a USB disk attachable 108 Mbps 802.11g wireless router to wirelessly share files or remote access while away from home and our recently announced wireless digital music player for streaming digital music from PCs or from the Internet to play on traditional analog stereos in the home.

43



Table of Contents

Competitive Strengths

      Since our inception in 1996, we have been solely focused on the networking needs of the small business and home markets. We provide a broad family of innovative networking products and have shipped over 22 million units worldwide. Over the course of the past seven years, we have built a significant market share in several of the geographic and product markets we serve. We believe that the NETGEAR brand name is widely recognized for quality products that meet the networking needs of small business and home users worldwide.

      Reliable, Easy-to-Use, Affordable Products. We design quality products, perform rigorous technology evaluation and conduct significant product testing, which we believe allow us to achieve a high degree of customer satisfaction and a low rate of product returns and defects. Our networking products are easy to install, use and maintain and minimize the need for users to perform hardware or software configuration. For example, our proprietary, Internet browser-based ‘Smart Wizard’ application provides users with simple graphical step-by-step installation instructions, including the automatic detection of their Internet connection type in order to automatically configure their routers or gateways. We also provide comprehensive technical support and customer service. Our products satisfy the budgetary requirements of small businesses and home users.

      Broad Product Offering. We offer an extensive range of networking products to users within the small business and home markets, including routers, gateways, access points, switches and NICs. Our product line includes approximately 100 products that are available in multiple configurations to serve the geographic region in which they are sold. Our products are designed for a variety of networking environments, including traditional Ethernet cabling and wireless as well as emerging in-home electrical wiring communication. We offer broadband products for a wide range of connection types, such as DSL and cable modems. Our wireless products include wireless LAN and security functionality to address the increasing mobility and security requirements of users. We believe users in the small business and home markets prefer to purchase all of their networking products from one vendor. We therefore believe the breadth of our product line represents a competitive strength due to our ability to meet a wide range of their networking needs.

      Extensive Global Channel Presence. We sell our products in North America, EMEA and Asia Pacific through an extensive network of sales channels. Our net revenue is well balanced worldwide, with 58% of our net revenue in 2003 being derived from sales in North America and 42% derived from international sales. Our worldwide channel presence enables our end-user customers to purchase our products with the same ease with which they purchase personal computers and software. We currently sell products through traditional retailers with more than 3,700 retail locations in North America, including Best Buy, Circuit City, CompUSA, Costco, Fry’s Electronics, MicroCenter, Office Depot and Staples domestically, and over 3,300 international retail locations, such as MediaMarkt (Germany, Austria) and PC World (UK) in Europe, and Harris (Australia) in Asia Pacific. Our broad product offering and sales volume enables us to command substantial shelf space at our traditional retailers worldwide, which we believe is a significant competitive advantage in our target markets. We also sell through online stores such as Amazon.com and Buy.com. We have a significant DMR presence, in both catalog sales and direct marketing channels, including relationships with CDW and PC Connection domestically and Misco Global and Insight Direct both domestically and internationally. We have relationships with thousands of VARs worldwide, including over 8,000 domestically and more than 3,000 internationally, which participate in our Powershift Partner program. This program provides incentives and training to select members who meet quarterly sales goals. In addition, we recently began selling our products through broadband service providers such as Time-Warner Cable and Comcast domestically, and Telstra in Australia and Tele Denmark.

      History of Product Innovation. The product requirements of small business and home networking users are continually changing with the rapid adoption of new technologies. We believe that our experience, market presence, and global reach enable us to identify trends in product demand and rapidly introduce products to meet that demand. Our corporate headquarters are located in Santa Clara in the heart of the Silicon Valley. From this location we team with a number of leading semiconductor and software companies in order to offer products that incorporate emerging technologies. In addition, our internal research and development efforts focus on designing products that meet the requirements of both the small business and home markets. We believe that the combination of our demand assessment capabilities and our technology collaborations often provides us with

44



Table of Contents

a time-to-market advantage. We were the first to introduce a number of new technologies to the small business and home markets including unmanaged Gigabit Ethernet switches, Cable/ DSL routers, wireless routers and gateways with high security capabilities and 802.11a/b/g Wireless NICs and 108 Mbps 802.11g Wireless NICs, Routers and Routers with USB attachable storage. In 2003, we introduced 48 new products.

      Operational Discipline. We utilize our management team’s significant experience in the networking, computer and retail industries to maintain tight operational discipline over product development and supply chain and channel inventory management. This has resulted in reduced manufacturing lead times, warranty costs, price protection expenses and channel inventory. Once we have identified a promising new networking technology, we work closely with our component vendors and original design manufacturing partners, or ODMs, in China and Taiwan to bring our products to market quickly, minimize product costs and ensure product quality. We have implemented several operational efficiency initiatives, including refining our supply chain management by introducing computerized monitoring of inventory levels and end-user purchases for many of our domestic resellers. We have also introduced an enhanced demand assessment process, which allows us to work with our resellers to closely monitor demand for specific product offerings.

Sales Channels

      Our products are sold through multiple sales channels worldwide, including traditional retailers, online retailers, DMRs, VARs and, recently, broadband service providers. We sell our products through more than 7,100 traditional retail locations, including domestic and international stores and online retailers, such as Amazon.com Systemax and Buy.com. Our retail channel primarily supplies products that are sold into the home market. We sell directly to Best Buy, Circuit City, Costco, Fry’s Electronics, Micro Center, Office Depot and Staples. The remaining traditional retailers, as well as our online retailers, are fulfilled through approximately 67 wholesale distributors, the largest of which are Ingram Micro and Tech Data. These wholesale distributors are located in the United States, the United Kingdom, France, Germany, Japan and Canada and approximately 30 other countries. We work directly with our retail channels on market development activities, such as co-advertising, in-store promotions and demonstrations, event sponsorship and sales associate training as well as establishing “store within a store” websites and banner advertising.

      We primarily sell our small business products through an extensive network of DMRs and VARs. Our DMRs include companies such as CDW and Insight. VARs include over 8,000 registered Powershift Partners in the United States and more than 3,000 Powershift Partners internationally. Our Powershift Partners are resellers who achieve prescribed quarterly sales goals and as a result may receive sales incentives, which can be used to offset marketing costs or marketing development funding. In addition, our Powershift Partners receive other sales tools, including select products available as demonstration units at an additional discount from our standard list price, exclusive promotions and rebates, monthly e-mails and newsletters with technical, marketing and sales updates, training and seminars, and co-marketing funds. Our products are also resold by a large number of smaller VARs whose sales are not large enough to qualify them for our Powershift Partner program. Our DMRs and VARs purchase our products through our wholesale distributors, primarily Ingram Micro and Tech Data. We earn revenue upon the sale of products to distributors and earn no additional revenue upon the resale of our products. The top five resellers of our products by dollar value as of December 31, 2003, in each category, are set forth in alphabetical order in the table below:

             
Retail

Domestic Stores International Stores Online Retailers DMRs




• Best Buy*
• Circuit City*
• CompUSA
• Fry’s Electronics*
• Staples*
  • FNAC (France)
• Future Shops (Canada)
• MediaMarkt (Germany, Austria)
• PC World (UK)
• Saturn (Germany, Austria)
  • 4sure.com
• Amazon.com
• Buy.com
• Dabs.com
• Systemax
  • CDW
• Dustin
• Insight
• Misco
• PC Connection

These customers purchase our products directly from us. The remaining customers on this list buy their products through our wholesale distributors.

45



Table of Contents

     We are currently developing and enhancing relationships with broadband service providers in North America and internationally and have recently signed agreements with Time-Warner Cable and Comcast to distribute our products to their subscribers.

Research and Development

      As of December 31, 2003, we had 30 employees engaged in research and development. We believe that our success depends on our ability to develop products that meet the changing user needs and to anticipate and proactively respond to evolving technology in a timely and cost-effective basis. Accordingly, we have made investments in our research and development department in order to effectively evaluate new technologies and develop new products. Our research and development employees work closely with our manufacturing partners to bring our products to market in a timely, high quality and cost-efficient manner.

      We identify and qualify new technologies, and we work closely with our various technology suppliers and manufacturing partners to develop products using one of two manufacturing methodologies as described below.

      ODM. Under the ODM methodology, which we use for most of our product development activities, we define the product concept and specification and perform the technology selection. We then coordinate with our technology suppliers while they develop the chipsets, software drivers and detailed circuit designs. If additional software is required, we either develop the software in-house, subcontract the development of the software, or purchase it from a third-party vendor. Once prototypes are completed, we work with our ODMs to complete the debugging and systems integration and testing. Our ODMs conduct all of the agency approval processes for electrical safety and electromagnetic interference. After completion of the final tests, agency approvals and product documentation, the product is released for production.

      OEM. Under the OEM methodology, which we use for a limited number of products, we define the product specification and then purchase the product from OEM suppliers that have existing products fitting our design requirements. Once a technology supplier’s product is selected, we work with the OEM supplier to complete the cosmetic changes to fit into our mechanical and packaging design, as well as our documentation standard. If software is involved, the look and feel of the software is modified by the OEM supplier to meet our standards. The OEM supplier completes regulatory approvals on our behalf. When all design verification and regulatory testing is completed, the product is released for production.

      Our internal research and development efforts focus on improving the industrial design of our products and enhancing their ease-of-use through the development of software such as our proprietary ‘Smart Wizard’ application. Our total research and development expenses were $4.4 million in 2001, and $7.7 million in 2002 and $8.7 million in 2003.

Manufacturing

      Our primary manufacturing contractors are Ambit Microsystems (recently acquired by Foxconn), Cameo Communications Inc., Delta Electronics, SerComm Corporation and Z-Com, Inc., all of which are headquartered in Taiwan. The actual manufacturing of our products occurs both in Taiwan and mainland China. We distribute our manufacturing among these key suppliers to avoid excessive concentration with a single supplier. Delta Electronics is associated with Delta International Holding Ltd., one of our stockholders. In addition to their responsibility for the manufacturing of our products, our manufacturers purchase all necessary parts and materials to produce complete, finished goods. To maintain quality standards for our suppliers, we have established our own product testing and quality organization based in Hong Kong, which is responsible for auditing and inspecting product quality on the premises of our subcontractors.

      We obtain other key components, such as connector jacks, plastic casings, physical layer transceivers and switching fabric semiconductors, from limited sources.

      We currently outsource warehousing and distribution logistics to three third party logistics providers who are responsible for warehousing, customer order fulfillment and distribution of products. In addition, these parties are also responsible for some final packaging of our products including bundling components to form

46



Table of Contents

kits, and inserting appropriate documentation and power adapters. APL Logistics Americas Ltd in Walnut, California serves the Americas region, Kerry Logistics Ltd in Hong Kong is our logistics provider serving the Asia Pacific region, and Furness Logistics BV in the Netherlands serves the EMEA regions.

Sales and Marketing

      As of December 31, 2003, we had 85 employees in our sales department and 14 employees in our marketing department. We work directly with our resellers on market development activities, such as co-advertising, in-store promotions and demonstrations, event sponsorship and sales associate training. We also participate in major industry trade shows and marketing events. Our marketing department is comprised of our product marketing and corporate marketing groups.

      Our product marketing group focuses on product strategy, product development roadmaps, the new product introduction process, product lifecycle management, demand assessment and competitive analysis. The group works closely with our sales and research and development groups to align our product development roadmap to meet key channel technology requirements from a strategic perspective. The group also ensures that product development activities, product launches, channel marketing program activities, and ongoing demand and supply planning occur in a well-managed, timely basis in coordination with our development, manufacturing, and sales groups, as well as our ODM, OEM and sales channel partners.

      Our corporate marketing group is responsible for defining and building our corporate brand. The group focuses on defining our mission, brand promise and marketing messages on a worldwide basis. This group also defines the marketing approaches in the areas of advertising, public relations, events, channel programs and our web delivery mechanisms. These marketing messages and approaches are customized for both the small business and home markets through a variety of delivery mechanisms designed to effectively reach end users in a cost-efficient manner.

      The needs of our small business and home customers differ, and therefore our marketing initiatives for each of these segments are distinct. In the small business market, we have focused on emphasizing our product line expansion, such as our introduction of a 24 port smart switch with gigabit ports, performance and reliability, and on channel development, while in the home market we have emphasized our wireless offerings, ease-of-use and aesthetics. In both markets, we have focused on developing the NETGEAR brand name, expanding our advertising programs and increasing public awareness through high visibility in the technical and popular press.

      We conduct much of our international sales and marketing operations through NETGEAR International, Inc., our domestic subsidiary, as well as through NETGEAR Deutschland GmbH, a German company and wholly-owned subsidiary of NETGEAR International, Inc.

Technical Support

      We provide technical support to our customers through a combination of limited permanent employees and an extensive use of subcontracted, “outsourcing” resources. Although we design our products to require minimal technical support, if a customer requires assistance, we provide free, high-quality technical advice worldwide over the phone and Internet. We currently subcontract first and second level technical support for our products, and as of December 31, 2003 we are utilizing 279 part-time and full-time individuals to answer customers’ technical questions. First level technical support represents the first team member a customer will reach with questions; and, typically, these individuals are able to answer routine technical questions. If they are unable to resolve the issue, the first level support member will forward the customer to our more highly trained second level support group. The most difficult or unique questions are forwarded to NETGEAR employees. This eight person in-house staff provides the most sophisticated support when customer issues require escalation.

      In addition to providing third level technical support, these internal NETGEAR employees design our technical support database and are responsible for training and managing our outsourced sub-contractors. We

47



Table of Contents

utilize the information gained from customers by our technical support organization to enhance our current and future products.

      In North America, the United Kingdom and Australia, the first and second level technical support is provided 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, 365 days a year on toll-free lines. Local language support is also available during local business hours in China, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Korea, Spain and Sweden.

Competition

      The small business and home networking markets are intensely competitive and subject to rapid technological change. We expect competition to continue to intensify. Our principal competitors include:

  •  within the small business networking market, companies such as 3Com, Allied Telesyn, The Linksys division of Cisco Systems, Dell Computer, D-Link, Hewlett-Packard and Nortel Networks; and
 
  •  within the home networking market, companies such as Belkin Corporation, D-Link, The Linksys division of Cisco Systems and Microsoft.

      Other current competitors include numerous local vendors such as Correga and Melco/ Buffalo Technology in Japan and TP-Link in China. Our potential competitors include consumer electronics vendors who could integrate networking capabilities into their line of products.

      Many of our existing and potential competitors have longer operating histories, greater name recognition and substantially greater financial, technical, sales, marketing and other resources. As a result, they may have more advanced technology, larger distribution channels, stronger brand names, better customer service and access to more customers than we do. For example, Dell Computer has significant brand name recognition and has an advertising presence substantially greater than ours. Similarly, Cisco Systems is well recognized as a leader in providing networking solutions to businesses and has substantially greater financial resources than we do. Several of our competitors, such as Linksys division of Cisco Systems and D-Link, offer a range of products that directly compete with most of our product offerings. Several of our other competitors primarily compete in a more limited manner. For example, Hewlett-Packard sells networking products primarily targeted at larger businesses or enterprises. However, the competitive environment in which we operate changes rapidly. Other large companies with significant resources could become direct competitors, either through acquiring a competitor or through internal efforts.

      We believe that the principal competitive factors in the small business and home markets for networking products are:

  •  product breadth;
 
  •  size and scope of the sales channel;
 
  •  brand name;
 
  •  timeliness of new product introductions;
 
  •  product performance, features, functionality and reliability;
 
  •  price;
 
  •  ease-of-installation, maintenance and use; and
 
  •  customer service and support.

      We believe that we compete favorably in each of these categories. To remain competitive, we believe we must invest significant resources in developing new products, enhancing our current products, expanding our sales channels and maintaining customer satisfaction worldwide.

48



Table of Contents

Intellectual Property

      We believe that our continued success will depend primarily on the technical expertise, speed of technology implementation, creative skills and management abilities of our officers and key employees, plus ownership of a limited but important set of copyrights, trademarks, trade secrets and patents. We primarily rely on a combination of copyright, trademark and trade secret and patent laws, nondisclosure agreements with employees, consultants and suppliers and other contractual provisions to establish, maintain and protect our proprietary rights. We hold an issued United States design patent relating to our home product design, and currently have at least five pending United States patent applications related to technology and products offered by us. In addition, we rely on third-party licensors for patented hardware and software license rights in technology that are incorporated into and are necessary for the operation and functionality of our products. We typically retain limited exclusivity over intellectual property we jointly develop with our OEM and ODM manufacturers. Our success will depend in part on our continued ability to have access to these technologies.

      We have trade secret rights for our products, consisting mainly of product design, technical product documentation and software. We also own and use distinctive trademarks on or in connection with our products, including NETGEAR, the GearGuy logo, FirstGear, ProSafe and Web Safe. NETGEAR is a trademark registered in Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Canada, the European Union, Japan, New Zealand and the United States. We have obtained or applied for registration for the “Everybody’s Connecting” trademark in Australia, the European Union, Japan, Korea and the United States. We have registered several Internet domain names that we use for electronic interaction with our customers including dissemination of product information, marketing programs, product registration, sales activities, and other commercial uses.

Employees

      As of December 31, 2003, we had 207 employees, with 107 in sales, marketing and technical support, 30 in research and development, 39 in operations, and 31 in finance, information systems and administration. We have never had a work stoppage among our employees and no personnel are represented under collective bargaining agreements. We consider our relations with our employees to be good.

      TriNet Employer Group, Inc. provides human resource services to NETGEAR and our employees including payroll, employee relations and certain employee benefit plans. TriNet is an employer services company contracted by us to perform certain employer responsibilities on our behalf, and TriNet is the employer of record for payroll, benefits and other functions involving our employment related administration. Our agreement with TriNet is terminable by either party with 30 days notice.

Properties

      Our principal administrative, sales, marketing and research and development facilities occupy approximately 56,000 square feet in an office complex in Santa Clara, California, under a lease that expires in December 2004. Several of our domestic sales employees perform their duties using leases of individual offices. Our international sales personnel reside in local sales offices in Australia, China, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Korea, Spain, Sweden, and the United Kingdom. We also have operations personnel using a facility in Hong Kong, which is subleased from our third party logistics provider, Kerry Logistics. We believe our existing facilities are adequate for our current needs.

      We use third parties to provide warehousing services to us, consisting of facilities in Southern California, Hong Kong and the Netherlands.

Legal Proceedings

      We are not currently a party to any material legal proceedings. We may be subject to various claims and legal actions arising in the ordinary course of business from time to time.

49



Table of Contents

MANAGEMENT

Directors and Executive Officers

      The following table sets forth the names, ages and positions of our directors and executive officers as of March 1, 2004.

             
Name Age Position



    47     Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Raymond P. Robidoux
    54     President
Jonathan R. Mather
    53     Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Mark G. Merrill
    49     Chief Technology Officer
Michael F. Falcon
    48     Vice President of Operations
Christopher C. Marshall
    47     Vice President of Finance
Charles T. Olson
    48     Vice President of Engineering
David Soares
    37     Vice President of Europe, Middle East and Africa Sales
Michael A. Werdann
    35     Vice President of North American Sales
Ralph E. Faison(1)
    45     Director
A. Timothy Godwin(2)
    54     Director
Linwood A. Lacy, Jr.(2)
    58     Director
Gerald A. Poch(1)
    57     Director
Gregory J. Rossmann(1)
    42     Director
Stephen D. Royer(2)
    39     Director


(1)  Messrs. Ralph E. Faison, Gerald A. Poch and Gregory D. Rossmann are members of the compensation committee.
 
(2)  Messrs. A. Timothy Godwin, Linwood A. Lacy, Jr. and Stephen D. Royer are members of the audit committee.

      Patrick C.S. Lo has served as our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer since March 2002. From September 1999 to March 2002, he served as our President, and since our inception in 1996 to September 1999, he served as Vice President and General Manager. Mr. Lo joined Bay Networks, a networking company, in August 1995 to launch a division targeting the small business and home markets and established the NETGEAR division in January 1996. From 1983 until 1995, Mr. Lo worked at Hewlett-Packard Company, a computer and test equipment company, where he served in various management positions in software sales, technical support, network product management, sales support and marketing in the United States and Asia, most recently as the Asia/Pacific marketing director for Unix servers. Mr. Lo received a B.S. degree in Electrical Engineering from Brown University.

      Raymond P. Robidoux has served as our President since July 2002. From July 2001 to May 2002, Mr. Robidoux worked at Quantum Corporation, a data technology company, where he served as senior vice president and general manager of the networked attached storage division. From March 1997 to March 2001, Mr. Robidoux was at Compaq Computer, where he served as vice president of its North America consumer business group, focused on sales, marketing and service, from March 1999 to March 2001, and as vice president of business planning and operations from March 1997 to February 1999. Prior to that, he held various management positions in the computer hardware industry, including sales, marketing and product development. Mr. Robidoux received a B.S. degree in Aerospace Engineering from California State Polytechnic University and an M.B.A. from Pepperdine University.

      Jonathan R. Mather has served as our Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer since October 2003 and served as our Vice President and Chief Financial Officer since August 2001. From July 1995 to March 2001, Mr. Mather worked at Applause Inc., a consumer products company, where he served

50



Table of Contents

as president and chief executive officer from 1998 to 2001, as chief financial officer and chief operating officer from 1997 to 1998 and as chief financial officer from 1995 to 1997. From 1985 to 1995, Mr. Mather was at Home Fashions Inc., a consumer products company, where he served as chief financial officer from 1992 to 1995, and as vice president, finance of an operating division, Louverdrape, from 1988 to 1992. Prior to that, he spent more than two years at the semiconductor division of Harris Corporation, a communications equipment company, where he served as the finance manager of the offshore manufacturing division. He has also worked in public accounting for four years with Coopers & Lybrand (now part of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP) and for two years with Ernst & Young. Mr. Mather is a certified management accountant (CMA) and is also a chartered accountant from the Institute of Chartered Accountants in Sri Lanka, where Mr. Mather received his undergraduate B.A. degree equivalent. Mr. Mather received an M.B.A. from Cornell University, New York.

      Mark G. Merrill has served as our Chief Technology Officer since January 2003. From September 1999 to January 2003, he served as Vice President of Engineering and served as Director of Engineering from September 1995 to September 1999. From 1987 to 1995, Mr. Merrill worked at SynOptics Communications, a local area networking company, which later merged with Wellfleet to become Bay Networks, where his responsibilities included system design and analog implementations for SynOptic’s first 10BASE-T products. Mr. Merrill received both a B.S. degree and an M.S. degree in Electrical Engineering from Stanford University.

      Michael F. Falcon has served as our Vice President of Operations since November 2002. From September 1999 to November 2002, Mr. Falcon worked at Quantum Corporation, a data technology company, where he served as Vice President of Operations and supply chain management. From April 1999 to September 1999, Mr. Falcon was at Meridian Data, a storage company acquired by Quantum Corporation, where he served as vice president of operations. From February 1989 to April 1999, Mr. Falcon was at Silicon Valley Group, a semiconductor equipment manufacturer, where he served as director of operations, strategic planning and supply chain management. Prior to that, he served in management positions at SCI Systems, an electronics manufacturer, Xerox Imaging Systems, a provider of scanning and text recognition solutions, and Plantronics, Inc., a provider of lightweight communication headsets. Mr. Falcon received a B.A. degree in Economics from the University of California, Santa Cruz and has completed coursework in the M.B.A. program at Santa Clara University.

      Christopher C. Marshall has served as our Vice President of Finance since November 2003. From January 2000 to June 2003, Mr. Marshall served as Vice President Finance and Chief Accounting Officer at BackWeb Technologies Ltd., a publicly-traded company that is a provider of offline Web software. From October 1998 to November 1999, Mr. Marshall served as Vice President Finance and corporate controller at Supercom Inc., a PC assembly and distribution company. Prior to joining Supercom, from August 1997 to October 1998 Mr. Marshall served as controller for S-Vision, a company focused on lighting technology research for scientific applications. Mr. Marshall has also served over twelve years in various financial management positions at Intel Corp. Mr. Marshall earned a B.Sc. at University College, Cardiff, U.K. a M.B.A. at London Business School and a M.A. at University College London. Mr. Marshall is a Fellow of the Institute of Chartered Accountants.

      Charles T. Olson has served as our Vice President of Engineering since January 2003. From July 1978 to January 2003, Mr. Olson worked at Hewlett-Packard Company, a computer and test equipment company, where he served as director of research and development for ProCurve networking from 1998 to 2003, as research and development manager for the Enterprise Netserver division from 1997 to 1998, and, prior to that, in various other engineering management roles in Hewlett-Packard’s Unix server and personal computer product divisions. Mr. Olson received a B.S. degree in Electrical Engineering from the University of California, Davis and an M.B.A. from Santa Clara University.

      David Soares has served as our Vice President of Europe, Middle East and Africa (EMEA) Sales since December 2003. Mr. Soares joined us in January 1998, and served as EMEA Managing Director from April 2000 to November 2003, United Kingdom and Nordic Regional Manager from February 1999 to March 2000 and United Kingdom Country Manager from January 1998 to January 1999. Prior to joining us, Mr. Soares

51



Table of Contents

was at Hayes Microcomputer Products, a manufacturer of dial-up modems. Mr. Soares attended Ridley College, Ontario Canada.

      Michael A Werdann has served as our Vice President of American Sales since December 2003. Since joining us in 1998, Mr. Werdann has served as our United States Director of Sales, E-Commerce and DMR from December 2002 to 2003 and as our Eastern regional sales director from October 1998 to December 2002. Prior to joining us, Mr. Werdann worked for three years at Iomega Corporation, a computer hardware company, as a sales director for the value added reseller sector. Mr. Werdann holds a B.S. Degree in Communications from Seton Hall University.

      Ralph E. Faison has served as one of our directors since August 2003. From February 2003 to the present, Mr. Faison has served as chief executive officer of Andrew Corporation, a public company and a manufacturer of communications equipment and systems, and from June 2002 to the present, Mr. Faison has also served as president and a director of Andrew Corporation. From June 2002 to February 2003, Mr. Faison served as chief operating officer of Andrew Corporation. From June 2001 to June 2002, Mr. Faison served as president and chief executive officer of Celiant Corporation, a manufacturer of power amplifiers and wireless radio frequency systems, which was acquired by Andrew Corporation in June 2002. From October 1997 to June 2001, Mr. Faison was vice president of the New Ventures Group at Lucent Technologies, a communications service provider, and from 1995 to 1997, he was vice president of advertising and brand management at Lucent Technologies. Prior to joining Lucent, Mr. Faison held various positions at AT&T, a voice and data communications company, including as vice president and general manager of AT&T’s wireless business unit and manufacturing vice president for its consumer products unit in Bangkok, Thailand. He is a member of the board of directors of WatchMark Corporation, a telecommunications company and a member of the board of directors of The Chicago Executives Club. Mr. Faison received a B.A. degree in marketing from Georgia State University and a M.S. degree in management as a Sloan Fellow from Stanford University.

      A. Timothy Godwin has served as one of our directors since August 2003. From July 1989 to January 1997, Mr. Godwin worked at Tech Data Corporation, an information technology products distributor, in various capacities including serving as a member of its board of directors, vice chairman focusing on worldwide finance and administration, president and chief operating officer, chief financial officer and senior vice president of finance. From 1974 to June 1989, Mr. Godwin was employed by Price Waterhouse (now part of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP), most recently as an audit partner from July 1987 to June 1989. Mr. Godwin is a Certified Public Accountant and received a B.S. degree in Accounting from the University of West Florida.

      Linwood A. Lacy, Jr. has served as one of our directors since September 2002. From July 1998 to July 2001, Mr. Lacy served as chairman of 4Sure.com, a direct marketer of computer and technology products. From October 1996 to October 1997, Mr. Lacy served as president and chief executive officer of Micro Warehouse Incorporated, a micro computer direct-marketing company. From 1985 to May 1996, he served as the co-chairman and chief executive officer of Ingram Micro, Inc., a microcomputer products distributor and a then wholly-owned subsidiary of Ingram Industries Inc. From April 1996 to May 1996, Mr. Lacy served as vice chairman of Ingram Industries Inc.; from June 1995 to April 1996, he served as its president and chief executive officer; and from December 1993 to June 1995, he served as its president. Mr. Lacy is a director of EarthLink, Inc., a public company, as well as a director of several private companies, including Ingram Industries Inc. Mr. Lacy received both a B.S. degree in Chemical Engineering and an M.B.A from the University of Virginia.

      Gerald A. Poch has served as one of our directors since March 2000. From January 2000 to the present, Mr. Poch has served as a Managing Director of Pequot Capital Management, Inc. and co-head of Pequot Ventures. Since August 1998, Mr. Poch has been one of the leaders of the venture capital team responsible for the growth and strategic direction of the group. From August 1996 to June 1998, he was the chairman, president and chief executive officer of G.E. Capital Information Technology Solutions, Inc., a technology solutions provider. Prior to that, he served as co-founder, co-chairman and co-president of AmeriData Technologies, Inc. (the predecessor company of G.E. Capital Information Technology Solutions, Inc.), a value-

52



Table of Contents

added reseller and systems integrator of hardware and software systems. Mr. Poch is a director of BriteSmile, Inc., Analex Corp. and Andrew Corporation, which are public companies, as well as a director of several private companies. Mr. Poch received a B.S. degree from the University of Connecticut and a J.D. degree cum laude from Boston University Law School.

      Gregory J. Rossmann has served as one of our directors since February 2002. From April 2000 to the present, Mr. Rossmann has served as a General Partner of Pequot Private Equity Fund II L.P. From April 1994 to April 2000, Mr. Rossmann served as Managing Director and partner at Broadview International, an investment banking firm. From June 1991 to April 1994, he worked at Dynatech Corporation, a technology holding company, where he served as manager of new business development. Prior to that, he was a co-founder of Telemaster Corporation. Mr. Rossmann is a director of several private companies. Mr. Rossmann received a B.S. degree in Electrical Engineering from the University of Cincinnati and an M.B.A. from Santa Clara University.

      Stephen D. Royer has served as one of our directors since September 2000. From 1991 to the present, Mr. Royer has been with Shamrock Capital Advisors, Inc., a merchant banking company, where he has served as a Managing Director for more than five years. Mr. Royer is a director of several private companies. Mr. Royer received a B.A. degree in Quantitative Economics from Stanford University and an M.B.A. degree from the University of California in Los Angeles.

Board Composition

      Our board of directors currently consists of seven members, who are Messrs. Lo, Faison, Godwin, Lacy, Poch, Rossmann and Royer. Mr. Lo is the only management member of our board of directors. Our directors hold office until their successors have been elected or qualified or until the earlier of their death, resignation, disqualification or removal. There are no family relationships among any of our directors and executive officers.

Director Compensation

      Our non-employee directors receive $1,000 per meeting and are entitled to reimbursement of business, travel and other related expenses incurred in connection with their attendance at meetings of the board of directors and committee meetings. The chairman of our audit committee receives an additional $1,000 per committee meeting attended and the chairman of the compensation committee receives an additional $500 per meeting attended. In addition, our directors, including non-employee directors, are eligible to receive stock options under our 2003 Stock Option Plan. New non-employee directors who join our board of directors are entitled to receive automatic, non-discretionary initial options to acquire 25,000 shares of our common stock, subject to three-year vesting. Directors who have served at least six months with us receive an annual option of 15,000 shares at each annual meeting starting at our 2004 meeting, which will be subject to one-year vesting, under our 2003 Stock Plan. See “Benefit Plans — Director Option Program.”

Board Committees

      Our board of directors has the authority to appoint committees to perform certain management and administrative functions. Our board of directors currently has an audit committee and a compensation committee.

     Audit Committee

      Our audit committee is responsible for annually recommending independent accountants, preparing the reports, statements or charters as may be required by Nasdaq or the securities laws, and reviewing:

  •  the adequacy of our system of internal accounting controls;
 
  •  our audited financial statements and reports and discussing the statements and reports with management, including any significant adjustments, management judgments and estimates, new accounting policies and disagreements with management; and

53



Table of Contents

  •  disclosures by independent accountants concerning relationships with our company and the performance of our independent accountants.

      Our audit committee currently consists of Messrs. Godwin, Lacy and Royer, each of whom is a non-management member of our board of directors. Mr. Godwin serves as chairman of the audit committee.

     Compensation Committee

      Our compensation committee is primarily responsible for reviewing the compensation, benefits, corporate goals and objectives of our chief executive officer and our other executive officers; evaluating the performance and compensation of our executive officers in light of those goals and objectives; administering our employee benefit plans and making recommendations to our board of directors regarding these matters. Our compensation committee currently consists of Messrs. Faison, Poch and Rossmann, each of whom is a non-management member of our board of directors. Mr. Poch serves as chairman of our compensation committee. No interlocking relationship exists between our board of directors or compensation committee and the board of directors or compensation committee of any other company.

Executive Compensation

      The following table sets forth information regarding the compensation earned by our Chief Executive Officer and each of our four other most highly compensated executive officers, collectively referred to as the named executive officers in this prospectus, during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003.

Summary Compensation Table

                           
Annual Compensation
Board Agenda

All Other
Name and Principal Position Salary Bonus(1) Compensation(2)




  $ 350,000     $ 100,000     $ 1,500  
  Chairman and Chief Executive Officer                        
Raymond P. Robidoux
    250,000       18,750       1,500  
  President                        
Jonathan R. Mather(3)
    250,000       43,750       39,069  
  Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer                        
Leslie A. Adams(4)
    206,731             109,063  
  Vice President of Marketing                        
Mark G. Merrill
    203,000       15,225       1,500  
  Chief Technology Officer                        

(1)  Each of our executive’s bonus is earned in 2003, subject to the review and approval of our Board, and paid in 2004.
 
(2)  All other compensation consists of discretionary matching contributions to our 401(k) plan on behalf of each named executive officer, unless otherwise stated. Excludes prerequisites and personal benefits, securities or property to the extent such benefits do not exceed the lesser of either $50,000 or 10% of the total annual sales, and bonus for the named executive officer.
 
(3)  Mr. Mather received other compensation consisting of a $1,500 matching contribution to our 401(k) plan on his behalf and a tax protected housing allowance of $37,569 for the year.
 
(4)  Ms. Adams received other compensation consisting of a $41,177 housing allowance, $41,424 moving expenses, $18,193 in bonus payments related to calendar year 2002, and $8,269 in payments resulting from her separation from us.

54



Table of Contents

Stock Option Grants in Last Fiscal Year

      No stock options were granted during 2003 to our named executive officers.

Option Exercises in Last Fiscal Year and Fiscal Year-End Values

      None of the named executive officers exercised options during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003. The following table sets forth the number and value of securities underlying options held as of December 31, 2003.

                                 
Number of Shares
Underlying Unexercised Value of Unexercised In-the-
Options at Year-End Money Options at Year-End


Name Exercisable Unexercisable Exercisable Unexercisable





    996,761             11,442,816        
Raymond P. Robidoux
    140,264       255,778       1,527,475       2,785,422  
Jonathan R. Mather
    231,022       165,020       3,396,023       2,425,794  
Leslie A. Adams
    51,041       123,959       509,900       1,238,350  
Mark G. Merrill
    562,871       8,236       6,415,174       82,279  

Employment Agreements and Change of Control Arrangements

      We have entered into employment agreements with the following of our named executive officers and current executive officers. Each agreement may be terminated by either us or the executive officer at any time with or without cause. In addition, the employment agreements provide for annual salary and bonus amounts and severance benefits, as may be adjusted from time to time by the board of directors.

      On December 3, 1999, we entered into an employment agreement with Patrick C.S. Lo, our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. The agreement provides that if within one year following a change of control of the company, Mr. Lo is terminated without cause or resigns for good reason, he is entitled to full acceleration of any unvested portion of his stock options, and severance payments at his final base salary rate for a period of one year after his termination or resignation. If Mr. Lo is terminated without cause, he is entitled to receive severance payments at his final base salary rate for a period of one year and will continue to have his stock options vest for one year after such termination.

      On December 9, 1999, we entered into an employment agreement with Mark G. Merrill, our Chief Technology Officer. The agreement provides that if within one year following a change of control of the company, Mr. Merrill is terminated without cause or resigns for good reason, he is entitled to receive two years acceleration of any unvested portion of his stock options. If Mr. Merrill is terminated without cause, he is entitled to receive severance payments at his final base salary rate for 26 weeks and will continue to have his stock options vest for one year after such termination.

      On July 15, 2002, we entered into an employment agreement with Raymond P. Robidoux, our President and on August 10, 2001, we entered into an employment agreement with Jonathan R. Mather, our Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. The agreements provide that if within one year following a change of control of the company the officer is terminated without cause or resigns for good reason, he is entitled to receive two years acceleration of any unvested portion of his stock options. If the officer is terminated without cause, he is entitled to receive severance payments at his final base salary rate for a period of 39 weeks and will continue to have his stock options vest for one year after such termination.

      On November 4, 2002, we entered into an employment agreement with Michael F. Falcon, our Vice President of Operations. On January 6, 2003, we entered into an employment agreement with Charles T. Olson, our Vice President of Engineering. On November 3, 2003, we entered into an employment agreement with Michael A. Werdann, our Vice President of America Sales. On November 14, 2003, we entered into an employment agreement with Christopher C. Marshall, our Vice President of Finance. Each of these agreements provide that if within one year following a change of control of NETGEAR, the officer is terminated without cause or resigns for good reason, he is entitled to receive two years acceleration of any

55



Table of Contents

unvested portion of his stock options, except that Mr. Falcon is entitled to receive one year acceleration of any unvested portion of his stock options. If the officer is terminated without cause, he is entitled to receive severance payments at his final base salary rate for a period of 26 weeks and will continue to have his stock options vest for one year after such termination, except that Mr. Marshall will continue to have his stock options vest for six months after such termination.

Benefit Plans

 
2000 Stock Option Plan

      Our 2000 Stock Option Plan, or the 2000 Stock Plan, was adopted by our board of directors in April 2000 and our stockholders initially approved our plan in April 2000. As of February 20, 2004, options to purchase an aggregate of 4,986,747 shares of our common stock were outstanding and remain subject to the terms of the agreements evidencing those options and the terms of the 2000 Stock Plan. Our board of directors determined that upon the closing of our initial public offering, no future options were to be granted under our 2000 Stock Plan, and all remaining authorized options have become issuable under our 2003 Stock Plan.

      The 2000 Stock Plan provides that in the event of (1) the direct or indirect sale by stockholders of more than 50% of our voting stock, (2) our merger with or into another corporation, (3) the sale of all or substantially all of our assets, or (4) our liquidation or dissolution, the successor corporation may assume or substitute for each option. If the successor corporation does not assume or substitute for the options, the options will become fully vested and exercisable as of ten days prior to the proposed transaction, provided that such options will terminate if not exercised prior to the acquisition or other transaction.

 
      2003 Stock Plan

      Our board of directors adopted the 2003 Stock Plan in April 2003, and our stockholders approved the plan in July 2003. This plan provides for the grant of incentive stock options to our employees and nonstatutory stock options, stock purchase rights and stock appreciation rights to our employees, directors and consultants.

      Number of Shares of Common Stock Available Under the 2003 Stock Plan. Approximately 1.6 million shares of our common stock have been reserved for issuance pursuant to our 2003 Stock Plan. As of February 20, 2004, options to purchase an aggregate of 314,875 shares of our common stock were outstanding under the 2003 Plan and 1,305,674 remain available for future grant.

      If an option, stock purchase right or stock appreciation right expires or becomes unexercisable without having been exercised in full, or is surrendered pursuant to an option exchange program, the unpurchased shares which were subject to such award will become available for future grant or sale under our plan (unless our plan has terminated). However, shares that have actually been issued under our plan, upon exercise of an option, stock purchase right or stock appreciation right, will not be returned to our plan and will not be available for future distribution under our plan, except if shares of restricted stock are repurchased by us at their original price, in which case such shares will be available for future grant under our plan.

      Administration of the 2003 Stock Plan. Our board of directors, or one or more committees appointed by our board, administers our 2003 Stock Plan. In the case of awards intended to qualify as “performance based compensation” within the meaning of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, the committee will consist of two or more “outside directors” within the meaning of Section 162(m). The administrator has the power to determine the terms of the options, stock purchase rights or stock appreciation rights granted, including the exercise price (which may be changed by the administrator after the date of grant), the number of shares subject to each award, the exercisability of the awards and the form of consideration payable upon exercise.

      Options. The administrator will determine the exercise price of options granted under our 2003 Stock Plan. The terms of our 2003 Stock Plan allow the administrator to grant options at exercise prices that are equal to or above fair market value. After termination of one of our employees, directors or consultants, he or

56



Table of Contents

she may exercise his or her option for the period of time stated in the option agreement. If termination is due to death or disability, the option will generally remain exercisable for 12 months following such termination. In all other cases, the option will generally remain exercisable for three months. However, an option may never be exercised later than the expiration of its term. The term of an incentive stock option may not exceed ten years, except that with respect to any participant who owns 10% of the voting power of all classes of our outstanding capital stock, the term must not exceed five years and the exercise price must equal at least 110% of the fair market value on the date of grant. The administrator determines the term of all other options. No optionee may be granted options to purchase more than 750,000 shares in any fiscal year. In connection with his or her initial service, an optionee may be granted additional options to purchase up to 750,000 shares.

      Stock Purchase Rights. Our 2003 Stock Plan allows the administrator to issue stock purchase rights at purchase prices that are equal to or above fair market value of the shares. Unless the administrator determines otherwise, the restricted stock purchase agreement, the agreement between us and an optionee which governs the terms of his or her stock purchase rights, will grant us a repurchase option that we may exercise upon the voluntary or involuntary termination of the optionee’s service with us for any reason including death or disability. The purchase price for shares we repurchase will generally be the original price paid by the optionee. The administrator determines the rate at which our repurchase option will lapse.

      Stock Appreciation Rights. A stock appreciation right is the right to receive the appreciation in the fair market value of our common stock between the exercise date and the date of grant. We may pay the appreciation in either cash or in shares of our common stock. Stock appreciation rights are subject to the terms established by the administrator and become exercisable as specified by the administrator in a notice of grant.

      Transferability of Awards. Unless the administrator determines otherwise, our 2003 Stock Plan does not allow for the transfer of awards other than by will or by the laws of descent and distribution, and only the participant may exercise an award during his or her lifetime.

      Adjustments upon Change in Control. Our 2003 Stock Plan provides that in the event of our change in control, including the sale of all or substantially all of our assets, the successor corporation will assume or substitute for each option or right. Any outstanding options or rights not assumed or substituted for will be fully exercisable, including as to shares that would not otherwise have been vested and exercisable, for a period of 15 days from the date of notice to the optionee. The option or right will terminate at the end of the 15-day period.

      Amendment and Termination of Our 2003 Stock Plan. Our 2003 Stock Plan will automatically terminate in 2013, unless we terminate it sooner. In addition, our board of directors has the authority to amend, suspend or terminate our 2003 Stock Plan provided it does not adversely affect any award previously granted under our plan.

 
      Director Option Program

      The director option program is part of our 2003 Stock Plan and provides for the automatic, periodic grant of nonstatutory stock options to our non-employee directors. Each non-employee director who joins our board receives an initial option to purchase 25,000 shares when such person first becomes a non-employee director, except for those directors who became non-employee directors through the termination of their employment with us. In addition, beginning in 2004, each non-employee director who has been a director for at least six months will receive a subsequent option to purchase 15,000 shares following each annual meeting of our stockholders.

      All options granted under our director option program have a term of ten years and an exercise price equal to the fair market value of our common stock on the date of grant. Each initial option becomes exercisable as to one-third of the shares subject to the option on each anniversary of the date of grant, provided the individual remains a non-employee director on such dates. Each subsequent option becomes exercisable as to 100% of the shares subject to the option on the first anniversary of the grant date, provided the individual remains a service provider on such date. If an outside director terminates service, he or she may generally exercise his or her options for 12 months following such termination or five years if

57



Table of Contents

termination is due to a qualifying retirement. In the event of our change in control, each non-employee director option will vest in full.
 
      2003 Employee Stock Purchase Plan

      Our board of directors adopted the 2003 Employee Stock Purchase Plan in April 2003, and our stockholders approved the plan in July 2003.

      Number of Shares of Common Stock Available Under Our Plan. As of December 31, 2003, a total of 500,000 shares of our common stock were available for sale under the 2003 Employee Stock Purchase Plan.

      Administration of Our Plan. Our board of directors, or any committee appointed by our board, administers our plan and has full and exclusive authority to interpret its terms and to determine eligibility under it.

      Eligibility to Participate. Our employees and employees of designated subsidiaries are eligible to participate if they are customarily employed by us or any participating subsidiary for at least 20 hours per week and more than five months in any calendar year. However, an employee may not be granted an option to purchase stock under our plan if such employee:

  •  immediately after the grant owns stock possessing 5% or more of the total combined voting power or value of all classes of our capital stock; or
 
  •  whose rights to purchase stock under all of our employee stock purchase plans accrue at a rate that exceeds $25,000 worth of stock for each calendar year.

      Offering Periods and Contributions. Our 2003 Employee Stock Purchase Plan is intended to qualify for preferential tax treatment under Section 423 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and contains consecutive six-month offering periods. Although the first offering period under this plan started on the effective date of our initial public offering and ended on January 31, 2004, offering periods generally start on the first trading day on or after February 1 and August 1 of each year.

      Our plan permits participants to purchase shares of our common stock through payroll deductions of up to 10% of their eligible compensation, which includes a participant’s base straight time gross earnings, commissions, overtime and shift premiums, but excludes all other compensation paid to our employees. A participant may purchase no more than 10,000 shares during any six-month offering period.

      Purchase of Shares. Amounts deducted and accumulated by the participant are used to purchase shares of our common stock at the end of each six-month offering period. The price is 85% of the lower of the fair market value of our common stock at the beginning of an offering period or on the last day of the offering period. Participants may end their participation at any time during an offering period, and will be paid their accumulated payroll deductions upon withdrawal. Participation ends automatically three months following termination of employment with us unless terminated earlier at the participants’ request.

      Transferability of Rights. A participant may not transfer rights granted under our plan other than by will or the laws of descent and distribution.

      Adjustments Upon Change in Control. In the event of our change in control, including the sale of all or substantially all of our assets, a successor corporation may assume or substitute for each outstanding option. If the successor corporation does not assume or substitute for the outstanding options, the offering period then in progress will be shortened by setting a new exercise date, any offering period then in progress will end on the new exercise date and participant payroll deductions held by us will be used to purchase shares of our common stock on the new exercise date.

      Amendment and Termination. The administrator has the authority to amend or terminate our plan, except that, subject to certain exceptions described in our plan, no such action may adversely affect any outstanding rights to purchase stock under our plan.

58



Table of Contents

     401(k) Retirement Savings Plan

      We sponsor a 401(k) retirement savings plan covering our employees who are at least 21 years of age. Our 401(k) retirement savings plan is intended to qualify under Sections 401(a) and 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. Contributions to the 401(k) retirement savings plan and income earned on such contributions are not taxable to employees until withdrawn from the 401(k) retirement savings plan. Subject to restrictions imposed by the Internal Revenue Code on highly compensated employees, employees may generally defer up to 100% of their pre-tax earnings up to the statutorily prescribed annual limit, which is $13,000 for the 2004 calendar year, and to have the amount contributed to the 401(k) retirement savings plan. The 401(k) retirement savings plan permits, but does not require, additional matching contributions to the plan. To date, we have made limited matching contributions to the 401(k) savings plan up to a maximum of $1,500 per year per person. The 401(k) retirement savings plan may be amended or terminated by us at any time in our sole discretion.

Limitation on Liability and Indemnification Matters

      As permitted by the Delaware General Corporation Law, we have adopted provisions in our certificate of incorporation and bylaws that limit or eliminate the personal liability of our directors. Consequently, a director will not be personally liable to us or our stockholders for monetary damages or breach of fiduciary duty as a director, except for liability for:

  •  any breach of the director’s duty of loyalty to us or our stockholders;
 
  •  any act or omission not in good faith or that involves intentional misconduct or a knowing violation of law;
 
  •  any unlawful payments related to dividends or unlawful stock repurchases, redemptions or other distributions; or
 
  •  any transaction from which the director derived an improper personal benefit.

      The limitations of liability do not affect the availability of equitable remedies such as injunctive relief or rescission. If Delaware law is amended to authorize the further elimination or limiting of the liability of a director, then the liability of our directors will be eliminated or limited to the furthest extent permitted by Delaware law as so amended.

      Our certificate of incorporation allows us to indemnify our officers, directors and other agents to the full extent permitted by Delaware law. Our bylaws permit us to purchase insurance on behalf of any officer, director, employee or other agent for any liability arising out of his or her actions in such capacity, regardless of whether Delaware law would permit indemnification, and to provide indemnification in circumstances in which indemnification is otherwise discretionary under Delaware law. Our bylaws specify circumstances in which indemnification for our directors and executive officers is mandatory and when we may be required to advance expenses before final disposition of any litigation.

      We have entered into indemnification agreements with each of our directors and officers that are, in some cases, broader than the specific indemnification provisions permitted by Delaware law, and that may provide additional procedural protection. The indemnification agreements require us, among other things, to:

  •  indemnify officers and directors against certain liabilities that may arise because of their status as officers or directors;
 
  •  advance expenses, as incurred, to officers and directors in connection with a legal proceeding, subject to limited exceptions; and
 
  •  in certain cases obtain directors’ and officers’ insurance.

      At present, there is no pending litigation or proceeding involving any of our directors, officers or employees in which indemnification is sought, nor are we aware of any threatened litigation or proceeding that could result in claims for indemnification.

59



Table of Contents

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS

      We describe below transactions and series of similar transactions, during our last three fiscal years, to which we were a party or will be a party, in which:

  •  the amounts involved exceeded or will exceed $60,000; and
 
  •  a director, executive officer, holder of more than 5% of our common stock or any member of their immediate family had or will have a direct or indirect material interest.

      We also describe below other transactions with our directors, executive officers and stockholders.

Our Formation and Separation from Nortel Networks

      We were incorporated in 1996 as a wholly-owned subsidiary of Bay Networks. Nortel Networks acquired Bay Networks in August 1998. We remained a wholly owned subsidiary of Nortel Networks until March 2000 when we issued and sold 3,320,537 shares of our Series B preferred stock to Pequot Private Equity Fund II, L.P. At such time, we also entered into a number of agreements with Nortel Networks, including a contribution agreement, an intellectual property license agreement, a transition services agreement and a loaned employee agreement. The transition services agreement and the loaned employee agreement have been terminated. Nortel Networks sold part of its ownership interest in us in September 2000 and sold the remainder of its ownership interest in February 2002.

Equity Transactions and Related Matters

 
Series B Preferred Stock Financing

      In March 2000, we issued and sold an aggregate of 3,320,537 shares of Series B preferred stock to Pequot Private Equity Fund II, L.P. for an aggregate purchase price of $15.0 million. The Series B preferred stock converted into common stock in connection with our initial public offering. Gerald A. Poch is a Managing Director of Pequot Capital Management, Inc. and co-head of Pequot Ventures, and Gregory M. Rossmann is a General Partner of Pequot Private Equity Fund II, L.P. Both Mr. Poch and Mr. Rossmann serve as members of our board of directors.

 
Nortel Networks Sale of Series A Preferred Stock

      In September 2000, Nortel Networks sold the following shares of our Series A preferred stock then held by it, at a price of $7.25 per share, to the following entities:

                   
Purchaser No. of Shares Purchase Price



(in thousands)
Shamrock Holdings of California, Inc. (which is a related party to Shamrock Capital Growth Fund, L.P.)
    2,068,809     $ 14,990  
Entities affiliated with Blue Ridge Limited Partnership
    1,131,703       8,200  
BMO Nesbitt Burns Capital (U.S.) Inc. (which is a related party to Harris Nesbitt Corp.)
    966,087       7,000  
Entities affiliated with The Abernathy Group Institutional HSN Fund, L.P.
    1,395,459       10,111  
Delta International Holding Ltd.
    414,037       3,000  
     
     
 
 
Total
    5,976,095     $ 43,301  
     
     
 

      Patrick C.S. Lo, our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, was a limited partner in The Abernathy Group. In December 2000, The Abernathy Group funds transferred an aggregate of 648,527 shares of our Series A preferred stock held by them to their limited partners, which included an aggregate of 94,192 shares transferred to a trust on behalf of Mr. Lo. Each of the transferees thereby became direct stockholders of NETGEAR.

60



Table of Contents

      Stephen D. Royer, one of our directors, is managing director of Shamrock Capital Advisors, Inc., which is a related party to Shamrock Capital Growth Fund, L.P. Mr. Royer is also an Executive Vice President of Shamrock Capital Partners, L.L.C., the general partner of Shamrock Capital Growth Fund, L.P. In March 2001, Shamrock Holdings of California, Inc. transferred all shares of our capital stock held by it to Shamrock Capital Growth Fund, L.P.

      All shares of preferred stock converted into common stock in connection with our initial public offering.

 
Series C Preferred Stock Financing and Repurchase of Series A Preferred Stock Held by Nortel Networks

      In February 2002, we issued and sold an aggregate of 10,937,408 shares of our Series C preferred stock to our stockholders of record (other than Nortel Networks), on a pro rata basis, for an aggregate purchase price of $5.2 million. As payment for the Series C preferred stock, the stockholders (other than Nortel Networks and Pequot Private Equity Fund, II, L.P.) transferred to us 75% of a contractual liquidation preference right that such stockholders previously obtained from Nortel Networks in connection with their purchase of shares of our Series A preferred stock from Nortel Networks in September 2000. The liquidation preference right required Nortel Networks to, in the event of a liquidation of the company at a price of less than $7.43 per share, pay to all holders of Series A preferred stock (other than Nortel Networks) an amount up to $2.19 per share. Since Pequot Private Equity Fund, II, L.P. did not hold any shares of our Series A preferred stock, Pequot Private Equity Fund, II, L.P. paid us approximately $4.7 million in cash to purchase shares of our Series C preferred stock in the financing. The Series C preferred stock converted into shares of common stock in connection with our initial public offering.

      We used the cash proceeds from the sale of our Series C preferred stock as partial consideration to repurchase 20,273,918 shares of the our Series A preferred stock held by Nortel Networks. In consideration for the repurchase of the shares, we (1) paid Nortel Networks $4.7 million in cash, (2) issued a $20.0 million subordinated unsecured convertible promissory note and (3) assumed 75% of the contractual liquidation preference obligation previously payable by Nortel Networks as described above.

      In connection with the stock repurchase, we also entered into a tax matters agreement with Nortel Networks which allocates rights and responsibilities for tax matters between us and Nortel Networks for prior tax years during which we were included in a joint tax return with Nortel Networks. The agreement provides that Nortel Networks will indemnify us for any tax liabilities arising on or before September 6, 2000 and we will indemnify Nortel Networks for any tax liabilities arising from our operations after September 6, 2000. We ceased to be included in Nortel Networks’ consolidated tax returns on September 6, 2000 for federal and state income tax purposes. We also entered into a letter agreement with Nortel Networks that sets forth the repayment terms of a $4.2 million trade payable obligation that we owed to Nortel Networks, which we have repaid in full.

 
Common Stock Warrant to Shamrock Capital Advisors, Inc.

      On March 13, 2002, we issued a warrant to Shamrock Capital Advisors, Inc. to purchase 218,750 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $1.29 per share, for services rendered to us by Shamrock in connection with our February 2002 Series C preferred stock financing. Pursuant to the warrant’s net exercise provision, the warrant was exercised in full immediately prior to our initial public offering with Shamrock Capital Advisors, Inc. receiving 198,593 shares of our common stock.

Registration Rights

      Certain of our stockholders are entitled to registration rights. See “Description of Capital Stock — Registration Rights.”

61



Table of Contents

Indemnification and Employment Agreements

      We have entered into indemnification agreements with each of our directors and officers. See “Management — Limitation on Liability and Indemnification Matters.” We have also entered into employment agreements with our officers. See “Management — Employment Agreements and Change of Control Arrangements.”

Certain Other Transactions with Executive Officers and Directors

      A. Timothy Godwin serves as one of our directors and also serves as chairman of the audit committee. From 1989 to March 1997, Mr. Godwin worked at Tech Data Corporation, an information technology products distributor, in various capacities, including as vice chairman, president, chief operating officer and a director of Tech Data from September 1995 to March 1997. A substantial portion of our revenue to date has been derived from a limited number of wholesale distributors, including Tech Data.

      Linwood A. Lacy, Jr., one of our directors, has been a director of Ingram Industries Inc. since 1991, and from 1985 to May 1996, he served as the co-chairman and chief executive officer of Ingram Micro, Inc., a microcomputer products distributor and a then wholly-owned subsidiary of Ingram Industries Inc. A substantial portion of our revenue to date has been derived from a limited number of wholesale distributors, the largest of which is Ingram Micro. From October 1996 to October 1997, Mr. Lacy also served as president and chief executive officer of Micro Warehouse Incorporated, a micro computer direct-marketing company acquired by CDW, one of our top five direct market resellers.

      In April 2002, we issued a stand-alone nonstatutory stock option to Michael Ressner, one of our former directors associated with Nortel Networks, to purchase 43,750 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $3.31 per share. The option is fully vested and expires on April 22, 2006, or earlier in connection with our change in control if not assumed or substituted by the successor company. Mr. Ressner resigned from our board of directors in February 2002 in connection with our repurchase of all of the shares of Series A preferred stock then held by Nortel Networks. We issued the stock option to Mr. Ressner pursuant to a settlement agreement and release in connection with such termination of services.

      In April 2003, we entered into separation and release agreements with each of Stephen Dix and Arthur J. Smith, two of our former executive officers. Pursuant to the terms of their separation agreements, each officer received 26 weeks of severance pay and benefits and option acceleration and exercise rights pursuant to the terms of their employment agreements with us.

      On December 21, 2003, we entered into a severance agreement and release with Leslie A. Adams, our former Vice President of Marketing. Pursuant to the terms of her separation agreement, she is receiving 26 weeks of severance pay and benefits and will continue to have her options vest through one-year following her separation from us. In addition, the agreement provides for the monthly payment of a housing allowance to Ms. Adams, payable during the 26-week period following her termination of employment. Ms. Adams has agreed to a one-year non-solicitation period regarding our employees.

 
Stock Option Grants

      We have granted stock options to purchase shares of our common stock to our executive officers and directors. See “Principal Stockholders.”

 
Stock Option Exchange Program

      On October 30, 2002, we completed a stock option exchange program whereby eligible officers and employees of the company had the opportunity to exchange all or part of their then existing stock options for new options pursuant to a six months and a day option exchange program.

      Mark G. Merrill, our chief technology officer, participated in the option exchange program, pursuant to which he tendered, and we accepted for cancellation, options to purchase 57,750 shares of common stock, with an exercise price of $8.57 per share, which were cancelled on March 15, 2002. We granted Mr. Merrill

62



Table of Contents

a new option to purchase 39,501 shares of common stock on October 30, 2002, with an exercise price of $6.00 per share.
 
45-Day Lock-up Agreement

      Prior to this offering, we had entered into a 45-day Lock-up Agreement with each of the selling stockholders, which restricted their ability to sell our stock. Those agreements were terminated in connection with each of the selling stockholders entering a lock-up agreement with Lehman Brothers Inc. in connection with this offering.

63



Table of Contents

PRINCIPAL AND SELLING STOCKHOLDERS

      The following table sets forth certain information with respect to the beneficial ownership of our common stock, as of February 20, 2004, for

  •  each stockholder who we know beneficially owns more than 5% of our common stock;
 
  •  each of our directors;
 
  •  each of our named executive officers;
 
  •  each selling stockholder; and
 
  •  all of our directors and executive officers as a group.

      Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. For the purpose of calculating the percentage of shares beneficially owned by any stockholder, the number of shares of common stock deemed outstanding “Prior to Offering” includes:

  •  29,654,777 shares of common stock outstanding as of February 20, 2004; and
 
  •  the shares of common stock subject to options held by the beneficial owner that are currently exercisable within 60 days after February 20, 2004.

      Except as indicated in the footnotes to this table and subject to applicable community property laws, the persons named in this table have the sole voting power with respect to all shares of common stock listed as beneficially owned by them.

                                         
Shares Beneficially Shares to be
Owned Prior Number of Beneficially
to this Offering Shares Owned After Offering

Offered in
Number of this Number of
Name of Beneficial Owner Shares Percent Offering Shares Percent






5% Stockholders and Selling Stockholders:
                                       
Pequot Capital Management, Inc.(1)
    6,953,486       23.4 %     3,606,775       3,346,711       11.3 %
Shamrock Capital Growth Fund, L.P.(2)
    4,796,094       16.2       2,487,735       2,308,359       7.8  
Blue Ridge Limited Partnership(3)
    2,539,976       8.6       1,317,486       1,222,490       4.1  
Halyard Capital Fund, LP(4)
    2,146,929       7.2       1,113,613       1,033,316       3.5  
The Abernathy Group(5)
    1,324,576       4.5       474,391       850,185       2.9  
                     
                 
Total
                    9,000,000                  
                     
                 
 
Executive Officers and Directors:
                                       
    1,206,080       3.9             1,206,080       3.9  
Raymond P. Robidoux(7)
    159,867       *             159,867       *  
Jonathan R. Mather(8)
    64,025       *             64,025       *  
Mark G. Merrill(9)
    485,339       1.6             485,339       1.6  
Richard A. Fabiano(10)
    218,315       *             218,315       *  
Michael F. Falcon(11)
    18,187       *             18,187       *  
Christopher C. Marshall
                             
Charles T. Olson(12)
    22,981       *             22,981       *  
David Soares(13)
    99,859       *             99,859       *  
Michael A. Werdann(14)
    292       *             292       *  
Ralph E. Faison
                             
A. Timothy Godwin
    10,415       *             10,415       *  
Linwood A. Lacy, Jr.(15)
    24,244                     24,244          

64



Table of Contents

                                         
Shares Beneficially Shares to be
Owned Prior Number of Beneficially
to this Offering Shares Owned After Offering

Offered in
Number of this Number of
Name of Beneficial Owner Shares Percent Offering Shares Percent






Gerald A. Poch(1)
    6,953,486       23.4 %     3,504,558       3,346,711       11.3 %
Gregory J. Rossmann(1)
    6,953,486       23.4       3,504,558       3,346,711       11.3  
Stephen D. Royer(2)
    4,796,094       16.2       2,417,232       2,308,359       7.8  
All executive officers and directors as a group (16 persons)(16)
    14,059,184       44.3 %     5,921,790       7,964,674       25.1 %

    *   Represents beneficial ownership of less than 1%.

(1)  Shares beneficially owned by Pequot Capital Management, Inc., the investment manager of Pequot Private Equity Fund II, L.P., represents 6,953,486 shares held of record by Pequot Private Equity Fund II, L.P. Pequot Capital Management, Inc. holds voting and dispositive power for all shares held by Pequot Private Equity Fund II, L.P. Gerald A. Poch is a Managing Director of Pequot Capital Management, Inc. and co-head of Pequot Ventures, and Gregory M. Rossmann is a General Partner of Pequot Private Equity Fund II, L.P. Both Mr. Poch and Mr. Rossmann serve as members of our board of directors and may be deemed to beneficially own the securities held of record by Pequot Private Equity Fund II, L.P. Mr. Poch and Mr. Rossmann disclaim beneficial ownership of these shares except to the extent of their pecuniary interest therein. The address of Pequot Capital Management, Inc. and Pequot Private Equity Fund II, L.P. is 500 Nyala Farm Road, Westport, CT 06880.
 
(2)  Shares beneficially owned by Shamrock Capital Growth Fund, L.P. represent 4,597,501 shares held of record by Shamrock Capital Growth Fund, L.P. and 198,593 shares hold of record by Shamrock Capital Advisors, Inc. Stephen D. Royer, one of our directors, is a managing director of Shamrock Capital Advisors, Inc., which is a related party to Shamrock Capital Growth Fund, L.P. Shamrock Capital Partners, L.L.C. holds voting and dispositive power for the shares held of record by Shamrock Capital Growth Fund, L.P. Mr. Royer is also an executive vice president of Shamrock Capital Partners, L.L.C., the general partner of Shamrock Capital Growth Fund, L.P. Mr. Royer disclaims beneficial ownership of these shares except to the extent of his pecuniary interest therein. The address of Shamrock Capital Advisors, Inc. and Shamrock Capital Growth Fund, L.P. is 4444 Lakeside Drive, Second Floor, Burbank, CA 91505.
 
(3)  Shares beneficially owned by Blue Ridge Limited Partnership represent 1,951,436 shares held of record by Blue Ridge Limited Partnership, 61,340 shares held of record by Blue Ridge Private Equity Fund, LLC and 527,200 shares of record held by Blue Ridge Offshore Master Limited Partnership. The sole managing member of each of Blue Ridge Private Equity Fund, LLC, JAG Offshore Holdings, LLC and JAG Holdings, LLC is John A. Griffin. JAG Holdings, LLC holds voting and dispositive power for the shares held by Blue Ridge Limited Partnership, JAG Offshore Holdings, LLC holds voting and dispositive power for the shares held by Blue Ridge Offshore Master Limited Partnership and Mr. Griffin holds voting and dispositive power for the shares held by Blue Ridge Private Equity Fund, LLC. Mr. Griffin disclaims beneficial ownership of these shares except to the extent of his pecuniary interest therein, Blue Ridge Offshore Master Limited Partnership disclaims beneficial ownership of the shares held by Blue Ridge Limited Partnership and Blue Ridge Private Equity Fund, LLC and Blue Ridge Limited Partnership disclaims beneficial ownership of the shares held by Blue Ridge Offshore Master Limited Partnership and Blue Ridge Private Equity Fund, LLC. The address of each of Blue Ridge Limited Partnership, Blue Ridge Offshore Master Limited Partnership and Blue Ridge Private Equity Fund, LLC is 660 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10021.
 
(4)  Shares beneficially owned by Halyard Capital Fund, LP represent 2,146,929 shares held of record by Halyard Capital Fund, LP. Its general partner is Halyard Fund GP, LP, which has as its general partner Halyard Advisors, LLC. Halyard Advisors, LLC has as its investment member Halyard Principals, LLC. Each of such entities or persons may be deemed to be the beneficial owner and hold voting and dispositive power for the shares owned by Halyard Capital Fund, LP. The principal business address of

65



Table of Contents

each such entity or person is Halyard Capital Fund, LP, 3 Times Square, 29th Floor, New York, NY 10036.
 
(5)  Shares beneficially owned by The Abernathy Group represent (1) 1,324,434 shares held of record by Abernathy NETGEAR Holding, LP and (2) 142 shares held of record by Abernathy Financial Services, LLC. Steven Abernathy holds voting and dispositive power for these shares. The address of The Abernathy Group is Wall Street Tower, 38th Floor, Twenty Exchange Place, New York, NY 10005.
 
(6)  Shares beneficially owned by Mr. Lo include (1) 199,171 shares held of record by The Patrick and Emily Lo Revocable Living Trust Dated 4-7-99, (2) 5,074 shares held of record by The Daphne T. W. Lo 2002 Irrevocable Education Trust, (3) 5,074 shares held of record by The Kai W. Lo 2002 Irrevocable Education Trust, and 996,761 shares issuable pursuant to options exercisable within 60 days of February 20, 2004.
 
(7)  Includes 159,867 shares issuable pursuant to options exercisable within 60 days of February 20, 2004.
 
(8)  Includes 64,025 shares issuable pursuant to options exercisable within 60 days of February 20, 2004.
 
(9)  Includes 485,339 shares issuable pursuant to options exercisable within 60 days of February 20, 2004.

(10)  Includes 218,315 shares issuable pursuant to options exercisable within 60 days of February 20, 2004.
 
(11)  Includes 18,187 shares issuable pursuant to options exercisable within 60 days of February 20, 2004.
 
(12)  Includes 22,981 shares issuable pursuant to options exercisable within 60 days of February 20, 2004.
 
(13)  Includes 81,958 shares issuable pursuant to options exercisable within 60 days of February 20, 2004.
 
(14)  Includes 292 shares issuable pursuant to options exercisable within 60 days of February 20, 2004.
 
(15)  Includes 24,244 shares issuable pursuant to options exercisable within 60 days of February 20, 2004.
 
(16)  Shares beneficially owned by all executive officers and directors as a group include 1,971,969 shares issuable pursuant to options exercisable within 60 days of February 20, 2004.

66



Table of Contents

DESCRIPTION OF CAPITAL STOCK

General Matters

      Our authorized capital stock consists of 200,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $0.001 per share and 5,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value $0.001 per share. The following summary of specified provisions of the common stock and the preferred stock does not purport to be complete and is subject to, and qualified in its entirety by, our certificate of incorporation and bylaws, which are filed as exhibits to the registration statement of which this prospectus forms a part, and by the provisions of applicable law.

      As of February 20, 2004, there were outstanding:

  •  29,654,777 shares of common stock held by 82 stockholders of record;
 
  •  options to purchase an aggregate of 5,301,622 shares of common stock; and
 
  •  no shares of preferred stock.

Common Stock

      Subject to preferences that may be applicable to any preferred stock outstanding at the time, the holders of outstanding shares of common stock are entitled to receive dividends out of assets legally available for distribution at such times and in such amounts as the board of directors from time to time may determine. Holders of common stock are entitled to one vote for each share held on all matters submitted to a vote of stockholders. Our certificate of incorporation and bylaws include provisions that require that certain amendments to the certificate of incorporation and the bylaws require the approval of the holders of at least 66 2/3% of the voting power of all outstanding stock. Cumulative voting for the election of directors is not authorized by our certificate of incorporation, which means that the holders of a majority of the shares voted can elect all of the directors then standing for election. The common stock is not entitled to preemptive rights or sinking fund provisions and is not subject to conversion or redemption. Upon liquidation, dissolution or winding-up of NETGEAR, the holders of common stock are entitled to share ratably in all assets remaining after payment of liabilities and the liquidation of any preferred stock.

Preferred Stock

      The board of directors is authorized, without action by the stockholders, to designate and issue preferred stock in one or more series. The board of directors can fix the rights, preferences and privileges of the shares of each series and any qualifications, limitations or restrictions thereon. The board of directors may authorize the issuance of preferred stock with voting or conversion rights that could adversely affect the voting power or other rights of the holders of common stock. The issuance of preferred stock, while providing flexibility in connection with possible acquisitions and other corporate purposes could, under certain circumstances, have the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing a change in control of NETGEAR. We have no current plans to issue any shares of preferred stock.

Registration Rights

      Until August 2006, and after giving effect to this offering, the holders of up to 11,228,480 shares of our common stock that was issued upon conversion of our Series A, Series B and Series C preferred stock have the right to cause us to register those shares under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Act.

  •  Demand Registration Rights; S-3 Registration Rights. Six months following completion of this offering, one or more stockholders holding at least 25% of the registrable shares of our securities has the right to request us to register shares held by them if the shares have an aggregate value of at least $5 million (based on the then current market price or fair value).
 
  •  Piggyback Registration Rights. One or more stockholders holding registrable shares may request us to have their shares registered anytime after our initial public offering if we file a registration

67



Table of Contents

  statement to register any of our securities for our own account. The underwriters of any underwritten offering will have the right to limit the number of shares having registration rights to be included in the registration statement, but not below 30% of the total number of shares included in the registration statement.

      Registration of shares of common stock because of the exercise of demand registration rights or piggyback registration rights under the Securities Act would result in the holders being able to trade these shares without restriction under the Securities Act when the applicable registration statement is declared effective. We will pay all registration expenses, other than underwriting discounts, related to any registration. The registration rights terminate upon the earlier of (1) August 5, 2006, (2) with respect to the demand registration rights of an individual holder, when the holder holds less than 175,000 registrable shares, or (3) for an individual holder, when the holder can sell all of the holder’s shares in any 90-day period under Rule 144 under the Securities Act.

Certain Provisions of our Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws and Delaware Anti-Takeover Law

 
Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws

      Certain provisions of Delaware law and our certificate of incorporation and bylaws could make more difficult the acquisition of NETGEAR by means of a tender offer, a proxy contest, or otherwise, and the removal of incumbent officers and directors. These provisions are expected to discourage certain types of coercive takeover practices and inadequate takeover bids and to encourage persons seeking to acquire control of NETGEAR to first negotiate with us. We believe that the benefits of increased protection of NETGEAR’s potential ability to negotiate with the proponent of an unfriendly or unsolicited proposal to acquire or restructure NETGEAR outweighs the disadvantages of discouraging such proposals, including proposals that are priced above the then current market value of our common stock, because, among other things, negotiation of such proposals could result in an improvement of their terms.

      Our certificate of incorporation and bylaws include provisions that:

  •  allow the board of directors to issue, without further action by the stockholders, up to 5,000,000 shares of undesignated preferred stock;
 
  •  require that any action to be taken by our stockholders be effected at a duly called annual or special meeting and not by written consent;
 
  •  prohibit cumulative voting in the election of directors;
 
  •  require that special meetings of our stockholders be called only by the board of directors, the chairman of the board, the chief executive officer or the president;
 
  •  establish an advance notice procedure for stockholder proposals to be brought before an annual meeting of our stockholders, including proposed nominations of persons for election to the board of directors; and
 
  •  require that certain amendments to the certificate of incorporation and the bylaws require the approval of the holders of at least 66 2/3% of the voting power of all outstanding stock.
 
      The Delaware General Corporation Law

      We are subject to Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law. This provision generally prohibits a Delaware corporation from engaging in any business combination with any interested stockholder for a period of three years following the date the stockholder became an interested stockholder, unless:

  •  prior to such date, the board of directors of the corporation approved either the business combination or the transaction that resulted in the stockholder becoming an interested stockholder;
 
  •  upon consummation of the transaction that resulted in the stockholder becoming an interested stockholder, the interested stockholder owned at least 85% of the voting stock of the corporation

68



Table of Contents

  outstanding at the time the transaction commenced, excluding for purposes of determining the number of shares outstanding those shares owned by persons who are directors and also officers and by employee stock plans in which employee participants do not have the right to determine confidentially whether shares held subject to the plan will be tendered in a tender or exchange offer; or
 
  •  on or subsequent to such date, the business combination is approved by the board of directors and authorized at an annual or special meeting of stockholders and not by written consent, by the affirmative vote of at least 66 2/3% of the outstanding voting stock that is not owned by the interested stockholder.

      Section 203 defines a business combination to include:

  •  any merger or consolidation involving the corporation and the interested stockholder;
 
  •  any sale, transfer, pledge or other disposition of 10% or more of the assets of the corporation involving the interested stockholder;
 
  •  subject to certain exceptions, any transaction that results in the issuance or transfer by the corporation of any stock of the corporation to the interested stockholder;
 
  •  any transaction involving the corporation that has the effect of increasing the proportionate share of the stock of any class or series of the corporation beneficially owned by the interested stockholder; or
 
  •  the receipt by the interested stockholder of the benefit of any loans, advances, guarantees, pledges or other financial benefits provided by or through the corporation.

      In general, Section 203 defines an interested stockholder as any entity or person beneficially owning 15% or more of the outstanding voting stock of the corporation and any entity or person affiliated with or controlling or controlled by such entity or person.

      These provisions are intended to enhance the likelihood of continuity and stability in the composition of the board and in the policies formulated by the board and to discourage certain types of transactions that may involve an actual or threatened change of control of NETGEAR. These provisions are designed to reduce our vulnerability to an unsolicited proposal for a takeover that does not contemplate the acquisition of all of our outstanding shares or an unsolicited proposal for the restructuring or sale of all or part of our company. These provisions, however, could discourage potential acquisition proposals and could complicate, delay or prevent a change in control of NETGEAR. They may also have the effect of preventing changes in our management. We believe that the benefits of increased protection of our potential ability to negotiate with the proponent of an unfriendly or unsolicited proposal to acquire or restructure us outweighs the disadvantages of discouraging these proposals, including proposals that are priced above the then current market value of our common stock, because, among other things, negotiation of these proposals could result in an improvement of their terms.

Transfer Agent and Registrar

      The transfer agent and registrar for our common stock is Mellon Investor Services LLC.

69



Table of Contents

UNITED STATES FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSEQUENCES

TO NON-UNITED STATES HOLDERS

      The following is a general discussion of the material United States federal income tax consequences of the ownership and disposition of our common stock to a non-United States holder. For the purpose of this discussion, a non-United States holder is any holder that for United States federal income tax purposes is not a United States person. For purposes of this discussion, the term United States person means:

  •  an individual citizen or resident of the United States;
 
  •  a corporation or other entity taxable as a corporation or a partnership or entity taxable as a partnership created or organized in the United States or under the laws of the United States or any political subdivision thereof;
 
  •  an estate whose income is subject to United States federal income tax regardless of its source; or
 
  •  a trust (a) whose administration is subject to the primary supervision of a United States court and which has one or more United States persons who have the authority to control all substantial decisions of the trust or (b) which has made an election to be treated as a United States person.

      If a partnership holds common stock, the tax treatment of a partner will generally depend on the status of the partner and upon the activities of the partnership. Accordingly, partnerships which hold our common stock and partners in such partnerships should consult their tax advisors.

      This discussion assumes that non-United States holders will hold our common stock issued pursuant to the offering as a capital asset (generally, property held for investment). This discussion does not address all aspects of United States federal income taxation that may be relevant in light of a non-United States holder’s special tax status or special tax situations. United States expatriates, life insurance companies, tax-exempt organizations, dealers in securities or currency, banks or other financial institutions, investors whose functional currency is other than the United States dollar, and investors that hold common stock as part of a hedge, straddle or conversion transaction are among those categories of potential investors that are subject to special rules not covered in this discussion. This discussion does not address any tax consequences arising under the laws of any state, local or non-United States taxing jurisdiction. Furthermore, the following discussion is based on current provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and Treasury Regulations and administrative and judicial interpretations thereof, all as in effect on the date hereof, and all of which are subject to change, possibly with retroactive effect. Accordingly, each non-United States Holder should consult a tax advisor regarding the United States federal, state, local and non-United States income and other tax consequences of acquiring, holding and disposing of shares of our common stock.

Dividends

      We have not paid any dividends on our common stock and we do not plan to pay any dividends for the foreseeable future. However if we do pay dividends on our common stock, those payments will constitute dividends for United States tax purposes to the extent paid from our current and accumulated earnings and profits, as determined under United States federal income tax principles. To the extent those dividends exceed our current and accumulated earnings and profits, the dividends will constitute a return of capital and will first reduce a holder’s basis, but not below zero, and then will be treated as gain from the sale of stock.

      Any dividend (out of earnings and profits) paid to a non-United States holder of common stock generally will be subject to United States withholding tax either at a rate of 30% of the gross amount of the dividend or such lower rate as may be specified by an applicable tax treaty. In order to receive a reduced treaty rate, a non-United States holder must provide us with an Internal Revenue Service Form W-8BEN or other appropriate version of Form W-8 certifying qualification for the reduced rate.

      Dividends received by a non-United States holder that are effectively connected with a United States trade or business conducted by the non-United States holder are exempt from such withholding tax. In order to obtain this exemption, a non-United States holder must provide us with an Internal Revenue Service, or IRS, Form W-8ECI properly certifying such exemption. Such effectively connected dividends, although not

70



Table of Contents

subject to withholding tax, are taxed at the same graduated rates applicable to United States persons, net of certain deductions and credits.

      In addition to the graduated tax described above, dividends received by corporate non-United States holder that are effectively connected with a United States trade or business of the corporate non-United States holder may also be subject to a branch profits tax at a rate of 30% or such lower rate as may be specified by an applicable tax treaty.

      A non-United States holder of common stock that is eligible for a reduced rate of withholding tax pursuant to a tax treaty may obtain a refund of any excess amounts currently withheld if an appropriate claim for refund is filed with the Internal Revenue Service.

Gain on Disposition of Common Stock

      A non-United States holder generally will not be subject to United States federal income tax on any gain realized upon the sale or other disposition of our common stock unless:

  •  the gain is effectively connected with a United States trade or business of the non-United States holder (which gain, in the case of a corporate non-United States holder, must also be taken into account for branch profits tax purposes);
 
  •  the non-United States holder is an individual who holds his or her common stock as a capital asset (generally, an asset held for investment purposes) and who is present in the United States for a period or periods aggregating 183 days or more during the calendar year in which the sale or disposition occurs and certain other conditions are met; or
 
  •  our common stock constitutes a United States real property interest by reason of our status as a “United States real property holding corporation” for United States federal income tax purposes at any time within the shorter of the five-year period preceding the disposition or the holder’s holding period for our common stock. We have determined that we are not and do not believe that we will become a “United States real property holding corporation” for United States federal income tax purposes.

Backup Withholding and Information Reporting

      Generally, we must report annually to the IRS the amount of dividends paid, the name and address of the recipient, and the amount, if any, of tax withheld. A similar report is sent to the holder. Pursuant to tax treaties or other agreements, the IRS may make its reports available to tax authorities in the recipient’s country of residence.

      Payments of dividends or of proceeds on the disposition of stock made to a non-United States holder may be subject to backup withholding (currently at a rate of 30%) unless the non-United States holder establishes an exemption, for example by properly certifying its non-United States status on a Form W-8BEN or another appropriate version of Form W-8. Notwithstanding the foregoing, backup withholding may apply if either we or our paying agent has actual knowledge, or reason to know, that the holder is a United States person.

      Backup withholding is not an additional tax. Rather, the United States income tax liability of persons subject to backup withholding will be reduced by the amount of tax withheld. If withholding results in an overpayment of taxes, a refund may be obtained, provided that the required information is furnished to the IRS.

71



Table of Contents

SHARES ELIGIBLE FOR FUTURE SALE

Sales of Restricted Shares and Lock-Up Agreements

      All of the shares sold in this offering will be freely tradable without restriction under the Securities Act, except for any shares purchased by our “affiliates” as that term is defined in Rule 144 under the Securities Act. In addition, the shares sold by us and the selling stockholders in our initial public offering and any shares previously sold by our stockholders pursuant to Rule 144 are freely tradable under the Securities Act, unless they were purchased by our affiliates. Substantially all of the remaining shares of our common stock that will be outstanding after this offering are “restricted” shares as that term is defined in Rule 144 under the Securities Act. We issued and sold the restricted shares in private transactions in reliance upon exemptions from registration under the Securities Act. Restricted shares may be sold in the public market only if they are registered under the Securities Act or if they qualify for an exemption from registration, such as Rule 144 or 701 under the Securities Act, which are summarized below.

      In connection with this offering, our directors, executive officers and certain stockholders, including the selling stockholders, have agreed to a 90-day lock-up with respect to approximately 10,756,740 shares, representing substantially all the shares they will beneficially own following this offering. In addition, the lock-up will apply to all shares of our common stock which such persons may acquire during this 90-day period upon exercise of options and warrants to acquire our capital stock. This generally means that they cannot sell these shares during the 90 days following the date of this offering. After the 90-day lock-up period ends, these shares may be sold only in accordance with an available exemption from registration, such as Rule 144 or 701, which are described below.

      We have filed a registration statement under the Securities Act covering shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of options or reserved for issuance under our stock plans. The shares registered under this registration statement will, subject to Rule 144 provisions applicable to affiliates, be available for sale in the open market, except to the extent that the shares are subject to vesting restrictions or the lock-up agreements described above.

      In general, under Rule 144 as currently in effect, beginning 90 days after the date of this prospectus, a person who has beneficially owned restricted shares for at least one year would be entitled to sell, within any three-month period, up to that number of restricted shares as is equal to the greater of one percent of the number of shares of common stock then outstanding (which will equal approximately 296,548 shares immediately after this offering) or the average weekly trading volume of our common stock on the Nasdaq National Market during the four calendar weeks preceding the filing of a notice on Form 144 with respect to such sale. Sales under Rule 144 are also subject to manner of sale provisions, notice requirements and the availability of current public information about us. Rule 144 also provides that our affiliates who are selling shares of common stock that are not restricted shares must nonetheless comply with the same restrictions applicable to restricted shares with the exception of the holding period requirement.

      Under Rule 144(k), beginning on the date of this prospectus, a person who is not deemed to have been an affiliate of ours at any time during the 90 days preceding a sale, and who has beneficially owned the shares proposed to be sold for at least two years, is entitled to sell those shares without complying with the manner of sale, public information, volume limitation or notice provisions of Rule 144.

      Rule 701 may be relied upon with respect to the resale of shares of common stock originally purchased from us by directors, employees or consultants prior to the date of this prospectus. Shares issued in reliance on Rule 701 are restricted shares and, subject to the lock-up agreements described above, may be sold beginning 90 days after the date of this prospectus by persons other than affiliates, subject only to the manner of sale provisions of Rule 144, and may be sold by affiliates under Rule 144 without compliance with its one-year holding period requirement.

      Sales under Rule 144 are also subject to certain manner of sale provisions and notice requirements and to the availability of current public information about us. Rule 144 also provides that our affiliates who sell

72



Table of Contents

shares of our common stock that are not restricted shares must nonetheless comply with the same restrictions applicable to restricted shares with the exception of the holding period requirement.

Rule 144(k)

      Under Rule 144(k), a person who is not deemed to have been one of our affiliates for purposes of the Securities Act at any time during the 90 days preceding a sale and who has beneficially owned the shares proposed to be sold for at least two years, including the holding period of any prior owner other than an affiliate of us, is entitled to sell such shares without complying with the manner of sale, public information, volume limitation or notice provisions of Rule 144. Therefore, unless otherwise restricted, “144(k) shares” may be sold immediately upon the completion of this offering.

Rule 701

      In general, under Rule 701 as currently in effect, any of our employees, consultants or advisors who purchase shares from us in connection with a compensatory stock or option plan or other written agreement will be eligible to resell such shares 90 days after the effective date of this offering in reliance on Rule 144.

Registration of Shares in Connection with Compensatory Benefit Plans

      As of February 20, 2004, options to purchase 5,301,622 shares of common stock were issued and outstanding under our Stock Plans, all of which are freely tradeable under the Securities Act.

Other Registration Rights

      Certain of our stockholders are parties to an agreement which obligates us to register their shares of our capital stock after this offering in specified circumstances. See “Description of Capital Stock — Registration Rights” for additional information.

73



Table of Contents

UNDERWRITING

      Under the underwriting agreement, which is filed as an exhibit to the registration statement relating to this prospectus, each of Lehman Brothers, Inc., Goldman, Sachs & Co., Needham & Company, Inc., Pacific Growth Equities, LLC, JMP Securities LLC and Harris Nesbitt Corp. has severally agreed to purchase from the selling stockholders the respective number of shares of common stock shown opposite its name below:

           
Number of
Underwriters Shares


Lehman Brothers Inc. 
       
Goldman, Sachs & Co. 
       
Needham & Company, Inc. 
       
Pacific Growth Equities, LLC
       
JMP Securities LLC
       
Harris Nesbitt Corp.
       
     
 
 
Total
    9,000,000  
     
 

      The underwriting agreement provides that the underwriters’ obligations to purchase shares of common stock depends on the satisfaction of the conditions contained in the underwriting agreement, including:

  •  the obligation to purchase all of the shares of common stock offered hereby if any of the shares are purchased;
 
  •  the representations and warranties made by us to the underwriters are true;
 
  •  there is no material change in the financial markets; and
 
  •  we deliver customary closing documents to the underwriters.

Over-Allotment Option

      The selling stockholders have granted to the underwriters an option to purchase up to an aggregate of 1,350,000 additional shares of common stock, exercisable to cover over-allotments at the public offering price less the underwriting discount shown on the cover page of this prospectus. The underwriters may exercise this option at any time, and from time to time, until 30 days after the date of the underwriting agreement. To the extent the underwriters exercise this option, each underwriter will be committed, so long as the conditions of the underwriting agreement are satisfied, to purchase a number of additional shares of common stock proportionate to that underwriter’s initial commitment as indicated in the preceding table, and the selling stockholders will be obligated to sell the additional shares of common stock to the underwriters.

Commissions and Expenses

      The following table summarizes the underwriting discounts that the selling stockholders will pay. The amounts are shown assuming both no exercise and full exercise of the underwriters’ option to purchase up to an additional 1,350,000 shares from the selling stockholders. The underwriting fee is the difference between the public offering price and the amount the underwriters pay to purchase the shares from the selling stockholders.

                 
No Exercise Full Exercise


Per share
  $       $    
Total
  $       $    

      The underwriters have advised us that they propose to offer the shares of common stock directly to the public at the public offering price presented on the cover page of this prospectus, and to selected dealers, who may include the underwriters, at the public offering price less a selling concession not in excess of $          per share. The underwriters may allow, and the selected dealers may reallow, a concession not in excess of $          per share to brokers and dealers. After the offering, the underwriters may change the offering price and other selling terms.

      We estimate that the total expenses of this offering, payable by the selling stockholders, including registration, filing and listing fees, printing fees and legal and accounting expenses, but excluding

74



Table of Contents

underwriting discounts, will be approximately $500,000. We anticipate the selling stockholders will bear substantially all costs and expenses of this offering.

      In January 2003, we entered into an agreement with Lehman Brothers Inc. pursuant to which Lehman Brothers Inc. would provide financial advisory services to us. The agreement terminated upon the closing of the initial public offering. Under the terms of the agreement, Lehman Brothers’ right of first refusal to provide financial advisory services to us survived termination of the agreement for a limited period of time following termination. The National Association of Securities Dealers deemed the right of first refusal to act as our underwriter or placement agent to be compensation to Lehman Brothers Inc. in this offering.

Lock-up Agreements

      We have agreed that, without the prior written consent of Lehman Brothers Inc., we will not, directly or indirectly, offer, sell or dispose of any common stock or any securities which may be converted into or exchanged for any common stock for a period of 90 days from the date of this prospectus. In connection with this offering, our directors, executive officers and certain of our stockholders, including the selling stockholders, have agreed to a 90-day lock-up with respect to approximately 10,756,740 shares, representing substantially all the shares they will beneficially own following this offering. Pursuant to these lock-up agreements they have agreed not to, without the prior written consent of Lehman Brothers Inc., directly or indirectly, offer, sell or otherwise dispose of any common stock or any securities which may be converted into or exchanged or exercised for any common stock that is subject to the lock-up, for a period of 90 days from the date of this prospectus.

Quotation on the Nasdaq National Market

      Our common stock is quoted on the Nasdaq National Market under the symbol “NTGR.”

Indemnification

      We and the selling stockholders have agreed to indemnify the underwriters against liabilities relating to the offering, including liabilities under the Securities Act and liabilities arising from breaches of the representations and warranties contained in the underwriting agreement, and to contribute to payments that the underwriters may be required to make for these liabilities.

Stabilization, Short Positions and Penalty Bids

      The underwriters may engage in over-allotment, stabilizing transactions, syndicate covering transactions, and penalty bids or purchases for the purpose of pegging, fixing or maintaining the price of our common stock, in accordance with Regulation M under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934:

  •  Over-allotment involves sales by the underwriters of shares in excess of the number of shares the underwriters are obligated to purchase, which creates a syndicate short position. The short position may be either a covered short position or a naked short position. In a covered short position, the number of shares over-allotted by the underwriters is not greater than the number of shares that they may purchase in the over-allotment option. In a naked short position, the number of shares involved is greater than the number of shares in the over-allotment option. The underwriters may close out any short position by either exercising their over-allotment option and/or purchasing shares in the open market.
 
  •  Stabilizing transactions permit bids to purchase common stock so long as the stabilizing bids do not exceed a specified maximum.
 
  •  Syndicate covering transactions involve purchases of the common stock in the open market after the distribution has been completed in order to cover syndicate short positions. In determining the source of shares to close out the short position, the underwriters will consider, among other things, the price of shares available for purchase in the open market as compared to the price at which they may purchase shares through the over-allotment option. If the underwriters sell more shares than could be covered by the over-allotment option, creating a naked short position, the position can only be closed out by buying shares in the open market. A naked short position is more likely to be created if the

75



Table of Contents

  underwriters are concerned that there could be downward pressure on the price of the shares in the open market after pricing that could adversely affect investors who purchase in the offering.
 
  •  Penalty bids permit the underwriters to reclaim a selling concession from a syndicate member when the common stock originally sold by the syndicate member is purchased in a stabilizing or syndicate covering transaction to cover syndicate short positions.

      These stabilizing transactions, syndicate covering transactions and penalty bids may raise or maintain the market price of our common stock or prevent or slow a decline in the market price of our common stock. As a result, the price of our common stock may be higher than the price that might otherwise exist in the open market. These transactions may be effected on the Nasdaq National Market or otherwise and, if commenced, may be discontinued at any time.

      Neither we nor any of the underwriters make any representation or prediction as to the direction or magnitude of any effect that the transactions described above may have on the price of our common stock. In addition, neither we nor the underwriters make any representation that the underwriters will engage in these stabilizing transactions or that any transaction, once commenced, will not be discontinued without notice.

Passive Market Making

      In connection with this offering, underwriters and selling group members may engage in passive market making transactions in our common stock on the Nasdaq National Market in accordance with Rule 103 of Regulation M under the Exchange Act during the period before the commencement of offers or sales of common stock and extending through the completion of the distribution. A passive market maker must display its bids at a price not in excess of the highest independent bid of the security. However, if all independent bids are lowered below the passive market maker’s bid, that bid must be lowered when specified purchase limits are exceeded.

Stamp Taxes

      If you purchase shares of common stock offered in this prospectus, you may be required to pay stamp taxes and other charges under the laws and practices of the country of purchase, in addition to the offering price listed on the cover page of this prospectus.

Electronic Distribution

      A prospectus in electronic format may be made available on Internet sites or through other online services maintained by one or more of the underwriters or selling group members participating in this offering, or by their affiliates. In those cases, prospective investors may view offering terms online and, depending upon the particular underwriter or selling group member, prospective investors may be allowed to place orders online. The underwriters may agree with us to allocate a specific number of shares for sale to online brokerage account holders. Any such allocation for online distributions will be made by the underwriters on the same basis as other allocations.

      Other than the prospectus in electronic format, information contained in any other web site maintained by an underwriter or selling group member is not part of this prospectus or the registration statement of which this prospectus forms a part, has not been approved or endorsed by us and should not be relied on by investors in deciding whether to purchase any shares of common stock. The underwriters and selling group members are not responsible for information contained in web sites that they do not maintain.

Other Relationships

      Some of the underwriters have performed and may in the future perform investment banking and advisory services for us from time to time for which they have received or may in the future receive customary fees and expenses. The underwriters may, from time to time, engage in transactions with or perform services for us in the ordinary course of their business.

76



Table of Contents

      Halyard Capital Fund, LP is an affiliate of Harris Nesbitt Corp. and is selling shares of common stock owned by it in this offering. This offering is being made in compliance with the applicable provisions of Rule 2720 of the Conduct Rules of the National Association of Securities Dealers. As a bona fide independent market exists for our common stock, the NASD does not require that we use a qualified independent underwriter for this offering.

77



Table of Contents

NOTICE TO CANADIAN RESIDENTS

 
Offers and Sales in Canada

      This prospectus is not, and under no circumstances is to be construed as, an advertisement or a public offering of shares in Canada or any province or territory thereof. Any offer or sale of shares in Canada will be made only under an exemption from the requirements to file a prospectus with the relevant Canadian securities regulators and only by a dealer properly registered under applicable provincial securities laws or, alternatively, pursuant to an exemption from the dealer registration requirement in the relevant province or territory of Canada in which such offer or sale is made.

      This prospectus is for the confidential use of only those persons to whom it is delivered by the underwriters in connection with the offering of the shares into Canada. The underwriters reserve the right to reject all or part of any offer to purchase shares for any reason or allocate to any purchaser less than all of the shares for which it has subscribed.

 
Responsibility

      Except as otherwise expressly required by applicable law or as agreed to in contract, no representation, warranty, or undertaking (express or implied) is made and no responsibilities or liabilities of any kind or nature whatsoever are accepted by any underwriter or dealer as to the accuracy or completeness of the information contained in this prospectus or any other information provided by us or the selling stockholders in connection with the offering of the shares into Canada.

 
Resale Restrictions

      The distribution of the shares in Canada is being made on a private placement basis only and is exempt from the requirement that we and the selling stockholders prepare and file a prospectus with the relevant Canadian regulatory authorities. Accordingly, any resale of the shares must be made in accordance with applicable securities laws, which will vary depending on the relevant jurisdiction, and which may require resales to be made in accordance with exemptions from registration and prospectus requirements. Canadian purchasers are advised to seek legal advice prior to any resale of the shares.

 
Representations of Purchasers

      Each Canadian investor who purchases shares will be deemed to have represented to us, the selling stockholders, the underwriters and any dealer who sells shares to such purchaser that: (i) the offering of the shares was not made through an advertisement of the shares in any printed media of general and regular paid circulation, radio, television or telecommunications, including electronic display, or any other form of advertising in Canada; (ii) such purchaser has reviewed the terms referred to above under “Resale Restrictions” above; (iii) where required by law, such purchaser is purchasing as principal for its own account and not as agent; and (iv) such purchaser or any ultimate purchaser for which such purchaser is acting as agent is entitled under applicable Canadian securities laws to purchase such shares without the benefit of a prospectus qualified under such securities laws, and without limiting the generality of the foregoing: (a) in the case of a purchaser located in a province other than Ontario and Newfoundland and Labrador, without the dealer having to be registered, (b) in the case of a purchaser located in a province other than Ontario or Quebec, such purchaser is an “accredited investor” as defined in section 1.1 of Multilateral Instrument 45-103 — Capital Raising Exemptions, (c) in the case of a purchaser located in Ontario, such purchaser, or any ultimate purchaser for which such purchaser is acting as agent, is an “accredited investor”, other than an individual, as that term is defined in Ontario Securities Commission Rule 45-501 — Exempt Distributions and is a person to which a dealer registered as an international dealer in Ontario may sell shares, and (d) in the case of a purchaser located in Québec, such purchaser is a “sophisticated purchaser” within the meaning of section 44 or 45 of the Securities Act (Québec).

78



Table of Contents

 
Taxation and Eligibility for Investment

      Any discussion of taxation and related matters contained in this prospectus does not purport to be a comprehensive description of all the tax considerations that may be relevant to a decision to purchase the shares. Canadian purchasers of shares should consult their own legal and tax advisers with respect to the tax consequences of an investment in the shares in their particular circumstances and with respect to the eligibility of the shares for investment by the purchaser under relevant Canadian federal and provincial legislation and regulations.

 
Rights of Action for Damages or Rescission (Ontario)

      Securities legislation in Ontario provides that every purchaser of shares pursuant to this prospectus shall have a statutory right of action for damages or rescission against us and any selling stockholder in the event this prospectus contains a misrepresentation as defined in the Securities Act (Ontario). Ontario purchasers who purchase shares offered by this prospectus during the period of distribution are deemed to have relied on the misrepresentation if it was a misrepresentation at the time of purchase. Ontario purchasers who elect to exercise a right of rescission against us and any selling stockholder on whose behalf the distribution is made shall have no right of action for damages against us or the selling stockholders. The right of action for rescission or damages conferred by the statute is in addition to, and without derogation from, any other right the purchaser may have at law. Prospective Ontario purchasers should refer to the applicable provisions of Ontario securities legislation and are advised to consult their own legal advisers as to which, or whether any, of such rights or other rights may be available to them.

      The foregoing summary is subject to the express provisions of the Securities Act (Ontario) and the rules, regulations and other instruments thereunder, and reference is made to the complete text of such provisions contained therein. Such provisions may contain limitations and statutory defences on which we and the selling stockholders may rely. The enforceability of these rights may be limited as described herein under “Enforcement of Legal Rights.”

      The rights of action discussed above will be granted to the purchasers to whom such rights are conferred upon acceptance by the relevant dealer of the purchase price for the shares. The rights discussed above are in addition to and without derogation from any other right or remedy which purchasers may have at law. Similar rights may be available to investors in other Canadian provinces.

 
Enforcement of Legal Rights

      We are organized under the laws of the State of Delaware in the United States of America. All, or substantially all, of our directors and officers, as well as the selling stockholders and the experts named herein, may be located outside of Canada and, as a result, it may not be possible for Canadian purchasers to effect service of process within Canada upon the company or such persons. All or a substantial portion of our assets and such other persons may be located outside of Canada and, as a result, it may not be possible to satisfy a judgment against us or such persons in Canada or to enforce a judgment obtained in Canadian courts against us or such persons outside of Canada.

 
Language of Documents

      Upon receipt of this document, you hereby confirm that you have expressly requested that all documents evidencing or relating in any way to the sale of the securities described herein (including for greater certainty any purchase confirmation or any notice) be drawn up in the English language only. Par la réception de ce document, vous confirmez par les présentes que vous avez expressément exigé que tous les documents faisant foi ou se rapportant de quelque manière que ce soit à la vente des valeurs mobilières décrites aux présentes (incluant, pour plus de certitude, toute confirmation d’achat ou tout avis) soient rédigés en anglais seulement.

79



Table of Contents

LEGAL MATTERS

      The validity of the shares of common stock offered hereby will be passed upon for us by Wilson, Sonsini, Goodrich & Rosati, Professional Corporation, Palo Alto, California. Certain legal matters in connection with this offering will be passed upon for the underwriters by Latham & Watkins LLP, Menlo Park, California.

EXPERTS

      The consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2002 and 2003 and for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2003 included in this prospectus have been so included in reliance on the report of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, independent accountants, given on the authority of said firm as experts in auditing and accounting.

80



Table of Contents

WHERE YOU CAN FIND ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

      We have filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, a registration statement on Form S-1 under the Securities Act with respect to the shares of common stock offered hereby. This prospectus, which constitutes a part of the registration statement, does not contain all of the information set forth in the registration statement or the exhibits and schedules filed therewith. For further information with respect to NETGEAR and the common stock offered hereby, reference is made to the registration statement and the exhibits and schedules filed therewith. Statements contained in this prospectus regarding the contents of any contract or any other document that is filed as an exhibit to the registration statement are not necessarily complete, and each such statement is qualified in all respects by reference to the full text of such contract or other document filed as an exhibit to the registration statement. A copy of the registration statement and the exhibits and schedules filed therewith may be inspected without charge at the public reference room maintained by the SEC, located at 450 Fifth Street, N.W., Room 1200, Washington, D.C. 20549, and copies of all or any part of the registration statement may be obtained from such offices upon the payment of the fees prescribed by the SEC. Please call the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330 for further information about the public reference room. The SEC also maintains an Internet web site that contains reports, proxy and information statements and other information regarding registrants that file electronically with the SEC. The address of the site is http://www.sec.gov.

      We are subject to the information and periodic reporting requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and, in accordance therewith, file periodic reports, proxy statements and other information with the SEC. Such periodic reports, proxy statements and other information are available for inspection and copying at the public reference room and web site of the SEC referred to above. We maintain a web site at www.NETGEAR.com. You may access our annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, free of charge at our web site as soon as reasonably practicable after such material is electronically filed with, or furnished to, the SEC. The reference to our web address does not constitute incorporation by reference of the information contained at this site.

81



Table of Contents

NETGEAR, INC.

 
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
         
Page

Report of Independent Auditors for the years ended December 31, 2001, 2002 and 2003
    F-2  
Consolidated Balance Sheets
    F-3  
Consolidated Statements of Operations
    F-4  
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity
    F-5  
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
    F-6  
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
    F-7  

F-1



Table of Contents

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders
of NETGEAR, Inc.

      In our opinion, the accompanying consolidated balance sheets and related consolidated statements of operations, of stockholders’ equity (deficit) and of cash flows present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of NETGEAR, Inc. and its subsidiaries at December 31, 2002 and 2003, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2003, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management; our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits of these statements in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America, which require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

      As discussed in Note 2 to the accompanying consolidated financial statements, in 2002 NETGEAR, Inc. changed its method of accounting for goodwill.

  /S/ PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP

San Jose, California

February 23, 2004

F-2



Table of Contents

NETGEAR, INC.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(In Thousands, Except Share and Per Share Data)
                       
December 31,

2002 2003


ASSETS
Current Assets:
               
 
Cash and cash equivalents
  $ 19,880     $ 61,215  
 
Short-term investments
          12,390  
 
Accounts receivable, net
    42,492       74,866  
 
Inventories
    24,774       39,266  
 
Deferred income taxes
          9,056  
 
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
    3,003       4,169  
     
     
 
   
Total current assets
    90,149       200,962  
Property and equipment, net
    3,144       3,626  
Goodwill
    558       558  
     
     
 
   
Total assets
  $ 93,851     $ 205,146  
     
     
 
LIABILITIES, REDEEMABLE CONVERTIBLE PREFERRED
STOCK AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)
Current Liabilities:
               
 
Accounts payable
  $ 10,628     $ 24,480  
 
Payable to related parties
    13,687       6,412  
 
Accrued employee compensation
    3,375       3,871  
 
Other accrued liabilities
    29,419       31,299  
 
Deferred revenue
    5,059       2,380  
 
Income taxes payable
    934       1,765  
 
Note payable to Nortel Networks
    13,294        
     
     
 
   
Total current liabilities
    76,396       70,207  
     
     
 
Commitments (Note 7)
               
Redeemable convertible preferred stock: $0.001 par value; shares authorized, 40,508,038 in 2002 and none in 2003
               
 
Series A, shares designated: 26,250,000 in 2002, none in 2003; shares issued and outstanding: 5,976,082 in 2002 and none in 2003
    6,630        
 
Series B, shares designated: 3,320,538 in 2002, none in 2003; shares issued and outstanding: 3,320,537 in 2002 and none in 2003
    14,955        
 
Series C, shares designated: 10,937,500 in 2002, none in 2003; shares issued and outstanding: 10,937,406 in 2002 and none in 2003
    26,467        
     
     
 
      48,052        
     
     
 
Stockholders’ equity (deficit):
               
 
Preferred stock: $0.001 par value; shares authorized, none in 2002 and 5,000,000 in 2003; none outstanding in 2002 or 2003
           
 
Common stock: $0.001 par value; shares authorized, 63,656,250 in 2002, and 200,000,000 in 2003;
               
   
Shares issued and outstanding: none in 2002 and 28,618,969 in 2003
          28  
   
Additional paid-in capital
    12,810       164,459  
   
Deferred stock-based compensation
    (4,997 )     (4,248 )
   
Cumulative other comprehensive income
          13  
   
Accumulated deficit
    (38,410 )     (25,313 )
     
     
 
     
Total stockholders’ equity (deficit)
    (30,597 )     134,939  
     
     
 
     
Total liabilities, redeemable convertible preferred stock and stockholders’ equity (deficit)
  $ 93,851     $ 205,146  
     
     
 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-3



Table of Contents

NETGEAR, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(In Thousands, Except Per Share Data)
                               
Year Ended December 31,

2001 2002 2003



Net revenue
  $ 192,440     $ 237,331     $ 299,302  
     
     
     
 
Cost of revenue:
                       
 
Cost of revenue
    172,795       176,972       215,332  
 
Amortization of deferred stock-based compensation
          144       128  
     
     
     
 
 
Total cost of revenue
    172,795       177,116       215,460  
     
     
     
 
Gross profit
    19,645       60,215       83,842  
     
     
     
 
Operating expenses:
                       
 
Research and development
    4,432       7,359       8,220  
 
Sales and marketing
    24,267       32,622       48,963  
 
General and administrative
    5,914       8,103       8,977  
 
Goodwill amortization
    335              
 
Amortization of deferred stock-based compensation:
                       
   
Research and development
          306       454  
   
Sales and marketing
          346       715  
   
General and administrative
          867       476  
     
     
     
 
     
Total operating expenses
    34,948       49,603       67,805  
     
     
     
 
Income (loss) from operations
    (15,303 )     10,612       16,037  
Interest income
    308       119       364  
Interest expense
    (939 )     (1,240 )     (901 )
Extinguishment of debt
                (5,868 )
Other expenses, net
    (478 )     (19 )     (59 )
     
     
     
 
Income (loss) before taxes
    (16,412 )     9,472       9,573  
Provision for (benefit from) income taxes
    3,072       1,333       (3,524 )
     
     
     
 
Net income (loss)
    (19,484 )     8,139       13,097  
Deemed dividend on Preferred Stock
          (17,881 )      
     
     
     
 
Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders
  $ (19,484 )   $ (9,742 )   $ 13,097  
     
     
     
 
Net income (loss) per share attributable to common stockholders (Note 4):
                       
 
Basic
  $ (0.66 )   $ (0.46 )   $ 0.55  
     
     
     
 
 
Diluted
  $ (0.66 )   $ (0.46 )   $ 0.49  
     
     
     
 
 
Weighted average shares outstanding
                       
Used to compute net income (loss) per share:
                       
Basic
    29,571       21,181       23,653  
     
     
     
 
Diluted
    29,571       21,181       26,800  
     
     
     
 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-4



Table of Contents

NETGEAR, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)

Years Ended December 31, 2001, 2002 and 2003
(In thousands, except share data)
                                                                 
Cumulative Total
Common Stock Additional Deferred Other Stockholders’

Paid-In Stock-based Comprehensive Accumulated Equity Comprehensive
Shares Amount Capital Compensation Income Deficit (Deficit) Income (loss)








Balance at January 1, 2001
        $     $ 2,601     $     $     $ (9,184 )   $ (6,583 )   $ (9,184 )
Net loss
                                  (19,484 )     (19,484 )     (19,484 )
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
 
Balance at December 31, 2001
                2,601                   (28,668 )     (26,067 )     (28,668 )
Forgiveness of payable by Nortel Networks
                2,927                         2,927        
Deferred stock-based compensation
                6,660       (6,660 )                        
Amortization of deferred stock-based compensation
                        1,663                   1,663        
Deemed dividend related to repurchase of Series A Preferred Stock and issuance of Series C Preferred Stock
                                  (17,881 )     (17,881 )     (17,881 )
Issuance of common stock warrant in connection with issuance of Series C Preferred Stock
                622                         622        
Net income
                                  8,139       8,139       8,139  
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
 
Balance at December 31, 2002
                12,810       (4,997 )           (38,410 )     (30,597 )     (38,410 )
Deferred stock-based compensation
                1,024       (1,024 )                        
Amortization of deferred stock-based compensation
                      1,773                   1,773        
Conversion of Preferred Stock into common stock
    20,228,480       20       48,019                         48,039        
Issuance of common stock (net of issuance costs of $2,999)
    8,050,000       8       101,801                         101,809        
Exercise of common stock warrants
    218,750             283                         283        
Repurchase of common stock
    (20,157 )           (283 )                       (283 )      
Exercise of common stock options
    141,896             805                         805        
Unrealized gain on short-term investments
                            13             13       13  
Net income
                                  13,097       13,097       13,097  
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
 
Balance at December 31, 2003
    28,618,969     $ 28     $ 164,459     $ (4,248 )   $ 13     $ (25,313 )   $ 134,939     $ (25,300 )
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-5



Table of Contents

NETGEAR, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(In thousands)
                                 
Year Ended December 31,

2001 2002 2003



Cash flows from operating activities:
                       
 
Net income (loss)
  $ (19,484 )   $ 8,139     $ 13,097  
 
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:
                       
   
Depreciation and amortization
    898       1,354       2,007  
   
Goodwill amortization
    335              
   
Amortization of deferred stock-based compensation
          1,663       1,773  
   
Deferred income taxes
    3,472             (9,056 )
   
Accretion of note payable to Nortel Networks
          1,220       838  
   
Extinguishment of debt charge
                5,868  
   
Changes in assets and liabilities:
                       
     
Accounts receivable
    14,400       (23,740 )     (32,374 )
     
Inventories
    31,259       6,482       (14,492 )
     
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
    (459 )     (1,093 )     (1,166 )
     
Accounts payable
    (7,402 )     (1,301 )     13,852  
     
Payable to related parties
    2,362       1,109       (7,275 )
     
Accrued employee compensation
    (463 )     2,404       496  
     
Other accrued liabilities
    7,302       14,674       1,880  
     
Deferred revenue
    (27,286 )     4,693       (2,679 )
     
Income tax payable
    (1,107 )     (441 )     831  
     
     
     
 
       
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
    3,827       15,163       (26,400 )
     
     
     
 
Cash flows from investing activities:
                       
 
Purchase of short-term investments
                (12,377 )
 
Purchase of property and equipment
    (1,122 )     (3,224 )     (2,489 )
     
     
     
 
       
Net cash used in investing activities
    (1,122 )     (3,224 )     (14,866 )
     
     
     
 
Cash flows from financing activities:
                       
 
Borrowing under line of credit
    12,042       47,473       17,000  
 
Repayments under line of credit
    (12,042 )     (47,473 )     (17,000 )
 
Repayment of note payable to Nortel Networks
                (20,000 )
 
Issuance of common stock in IPO
                101,809  
 
Proceeds from issuance of Series C Preferred Stock
          4,700        
 
Series C Preferred Stock issuance costs
          (1,211 )      
 
Repurchase of Series A Preferred Stock
          (4,700 )     (13 )
 
Proceeds from exercise of stock options
                805  
     
     
     
 
       
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
          (1,211 )     82,601  
     
     
     
 
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents
    2,705       10,728       41,335  
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year
    6,447       9,152       19,880  
     
     
     
 
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year
  $ 9,152     $ 19,880     $ 61,215  
     
     
     
 
Supplemental cash flow information:
                       
 
Cash paid for income taxes
  $ 425     $ 1,903     $ 4,840  
     
     
     
 
 
Cash paid for interest
  $ 939     $ 18     $ 67  
     
     
     
 
Supplemental schedule of noncash investing and financing:
                       
 
Conversion of Preferred Stock to common stock
  $     $     $ 48,039  
     
     
     
 
 
Cashless exercise of warrants and net common stock issued
  $     $     $ 283  
     
     
     
 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-6



Table of Contents

NETGEAR, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 1 — The Company and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies:

     The Company

      NETGEAR, Inc. (“NETGEAR” or the “Company”) was incorporated in Delaware in January 1996. The Company designs, develops and markets networking products that address the specific needs of small businesses and homes, enabling customers to share Internet access, peripherals, files and digital content and applications among multiple personal computers. The Company’s products include Ethernet networking products, broadband products and wireless networking products that are sold through traditional retailers, on-line retailers, direct marketing resellers, or DMRs, value added resellers, or VARs, and broadband service providers.

      The Company was a wholly owned subsidiary of Nortel Networks NA Inc. (“Nortel Networks”) until March 2000. In March 2000, the Company sold Series B redeemable convertible preferred stock (“Preferred Stock”) to a third-party investor, thereby diluting Nortel Networks’ ownership in the Company. In September 2000, Nortel Networks sold a portion of its ownership in the Company to additional third-party investors, further diluting its ownership interest in the Company. In February 2002, the Company sold Series C Preferred Stock to third-party investors, and Nortel Networks sold to the Company its remaining ownership interest in the Company. See Note 8 for description of the change in capital structure of the Company.

      On July 31, 2003, the Company completed its initial public offering, selling 8,050,000 shares of common stock (which included an underwriters’ overallotment of 1,050,000 shares) resulting in net proceeds to the Company of $101.8 million (after underwriters’ discount of $7.9 million and related offering expenses of $3.0 million). During the third quarter of 2003 the Company used $20.0 million of the proceeds to repay debt to Nortel Networks that had a carrying value of $14.1 million. The repayment of debt resulted in the recognition of an extinguishment of debt charge of $5.9 million in the third quarter of 2003 due to the acceleration of interest expense equal to the unamortized discount balance at the date of repayment. The Company also used an additional $17.0 million of the proceeds to repay debt on amounts drawn on its bank line of credit.

      Immediately prior to its initial public offering, the Company effected a split of its outstanding common stock of 1.75 shares for each share outstanding. All shares and per share calculations included in the accompanying consolidated financial statements of NETGEAR have been adjusted to reflect this split.

     Basis of presentation

      The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries. All inter-company accounts and transactions have been eliminated in the consolidation of these subsidiaries.

     Fiscal periods

      The Company’s fiscal year begins on January 1 of the year stated and ends on December 31 of the same year. Effective January 1, 2002, the Company began reporting its results on a fiscal quarter basis rather than on a calendar quarter basis. Under the fiscal quarter basis, each of the first three fiscal quarters ends on the Sunday closest to the calendar quarter end, with the fourth quarter ending on December 31.

     Use of estimates

      The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial

F-7



Table of Contents

NETGEAR, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

statements and reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

     Cash and cash equivalents

      The Company considers all highly liquid investments with an original maturity, or a remaining maturity at the time of purchase, of three months or less to be cash equivalents. The Company deposits cash and cash equivalents with high credit quality financial institutions.

     Short-term Investments

      Short-term investments comprise of marketable securities that consist of government securities with an original maturity or a remaining maturity at the time of purchase, of greater than three months and less than twelve months. All marketable securities are held in the Company’s name and are held primarily with one high quality banking institution. The Company’s policy is to protect the value of its investment portfolio and minimize principal risk by earning returns based on current interest rates. All of the Company’s marketable securities are classified as available-for-sale securities in accordance with the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 115, “Accounting For Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities” and are carried at fair value with unrealized gains and losses, net of taxes, reported as a separate component of stockholders’ equity.

     Certain risks and uncertainties

      The Company’s products and services are concentrated in a single segment in the networking industry, which is characterized by rapid technological advances, changes in customer requirements and evolving regulatory requirements and industry standards. The success of the Company depends on management’s ability to anticipate and/or to respond quickly and adequately to technological developments in its industry, changes in customer requirements or changes in regulatory requirements or industry standards. Any significant delays in the development or introduction of products or services could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business and operating results.

      The Company relies on a limited number of third parties to manufacture all of its products. If any of the Company’s third party manufacturers cannot or will not manufacture its products in required volumes, on a cost-effective basis, in a timely manner, or at all, the Company will have to secure additional manufacturing capacity. Any interruption or delay in manufacturing could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business and operating results.

     Concentration of credit risk

      Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to a concentration of credit risk consist of cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments and accounts receivable. The Company believes that there is minimal credit risk associated with the investment of its cash and cash equivalents and short-term investment, due to the high quality banking institutions in which its investments are deposited and the restrictions placed on the type of investment that can be entered into under the Company’s investment policy.

      The Company’s accounts receivable are derived from revenue earned from customers located in the United States, and at numerous international locations around the world. The Company’s customers are primarily distributors, retailers and broadband service providers who sell the product to a large group of end users. The Company performs ongoing credit evaluations of its customers’ financial condition and, generally, requires no collateral from its customers. The Company maintains an allowance for doubtful accounts receivable based upon the estimated rates for failure to pay by customers.

F-8



Table of Contents

NETGEAR, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

      The following table summarizes the balances from customers in excess of 10% of the total accounts receivable as of December 31, 2002 and 2003.

                 
December 31,

2002 2003


Company A
    30 %     40%  
Company B
    16 %     10%  
Company C
          15%  

     Fair value of financial instruments

      The carrying amounts of the Company’s financial instruments, including cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, prepaid expenses, accounts payable, accrued employee compensation and other accrued liabilities approximate their fair values due to their short maturities. See Note 2 for fair value of short-term investments.

     Inventories

      Inventories consist primarily of finished goods which are valued at the lower of cost or market, cost being determined using the first-in, first-out method.

     Property and equipment

      Property and equipment are stated at historical cost, less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets as follows:

     
Computer equipment
  2-3 years
Furniture and fixtures
   5 years
Software
  2-5 years
Machinery and equipment
  1-3 years
Leasehold improvements
  Shorter of the lease term or 5 years

      The Company accounts for impairment of property and equipment in accordance with SFAS No. 144 “Accounting for the Impairment of Disposal of Long-Lived Assets.” Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by comparing the carrying amount of an asset to the estimated undiscounted future cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If the carrying amount of the asset exceeds its estimated undiscounted future net cash flows, an impairment charge is recognized by the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset exceeds the fair value of the assets. The carrying value of the asset is reviewed on a regular basis for the existence of facts, both internally and externally, that may suggest impairment. The Company did not recognize impairment charges in any of the periods presented.

     Goodwill

      In 2002, the Company adopted SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets.” SFAS No. 142 requires, among other things, the discontinuance of goodwill amortization and the performance of an annual impairment test. As a result, a total of approximately $558,000 of goodwill will no longer be amortized. The standard also requires that goodwill be allocated to a company’s reporting units for purposes of impairment testing. The Company has only one reporting unit. In lieu of amortization, the Company regularly reviews the goodwill balance for potential impairment. The identification and measurement of goodwill impairment involves the estimation of the fair value of the Company. The estimates of fair value of the Company are based on the best information available as of the date of the assessment, which primarily includes the Company’s market capitalization and incorporates management assumptions about expected future cash flows.

F-9



Table of Contents

NETGEAR, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

Although no goodwill impairment has been recorded to date, there can be no assurances that future goodwill impairment will not occur.

     Product Warranties

      The Company provides for future warranty obligations upon product delivery. The warranties are generally for one year from the date of purchase by the end user. The Company’s liability under these warranties is to provide a replacement product or issue a credit to the customer. Because the Company’s products are manufactured by a contract manufacturer, in most cases the Company has recourse to the contract manufacturer for replacement or credit for the defective products. The Company accounts for warranty returns similar to stock rotation returns. That is, revenue on shipments is reduced for estimated returns for product under warranty. Factors that affect the Company’s warranty liability include the number of installed units, historical experience and management’s judgment regarding anticipated rates of warranty claims. The Company assesses the adequacy of its warranty liability every quarter and makes adjustments to the liability if necessary. Changes in the Company’s warranty liability, which is included as a component of “Other accrued liabilities” on the Consolidated Balance Sheet, during the periods are as follows (in thousands):

                 
Year Ended December 31,

2002 2003


Balance as of the beginning of the period
  $ 4,720     $ 8,941  
Provision for warranty liability for sales made during the period
    12,587       16,237  
Settlements made during the period
    (8,366 )     (13,219 )
     
     
 
Balance as of the end of period
  $ 8,941     $ 11,959  
     
     
 

     Revenue recognition

      Revenue from product sales is generally recognized at the time the product is shipped, provided that persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, title and risk of loss has transferred to the customer, the selling price is fixed or determinable and the collection of the related receivable is reasonably assured. At the end of each fiscal quarter, the Company estimates and defers revenue related to the product that is in-transit to international customers and selected retail customers in the United States that purchase direct from the Company. The revenue continues to be deferred until such time that title passes to the customer. Currently, for international customers, title passes to the customer upon delivery to the port of destination and for our selected retailers in the United States to whom the Company sells directly; title passes to the customer upon their receipt of product.

      In addition to warranty-related returns, certain distributors and retailers generally have the right to return product for stock rotation purposes. Every quarter, stock rotation rights are limited to 10% of invoiced sales to the distributor or retailer in the prior quarter. Upon shipment of the product, the Company reduces revenue for an estimate of potential future product warranty and stock rotation returns related to current period product revenue. Management analyzes historical returns, channel inventory levels, current economic trends and changes in customer demand and acceptance of the Company’s products when evaluating the adequacy of the allowance for sales returns, namely warranty and stock rotations returns. Revenue on shipments is also reduced for estimated price protection programs and cooperative marketing expenses deemed to be sales incentives under Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) Issue 01-9.

     Sales incentives

      The Company follows EITF Issue 01-9, “Accounting for Consideration Given by a Vendor to a Customer or a Reseller of the Vendor’s Products.” As a consequence, the Company records channel marketing costs as a reduction of net revenue.

F-10



Table of Contents

NETGEAR, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

     Shipping and handling fees and costs

      In September 2000, the EITF issued EITF Issue 00-10, “Accounting for Shipping and Handling Fees and Costs.” EITF Issue 00-10 requires shipping and handling fees billed to customers to be classified as revenue and shipping and handling costs to be either classified as cost of revenue or disclosed in the notes to the consolidated financial statements. The Company includes shipping and handling fees billed to customers in net revenue. Shipping and handling costs associated with inbound freight are included in cost of revenue. Shipping and handling costs associated with outbound freight are included in sales and marketing expenses and totaled $2.6 million, $2.7 million and $4.2 million in the years ended December 31, 2001, 2002 and 2003, respectively.

     Research and development

      Costs incurred in the research and development of new products and enhancements to existing products are charged to expense as incurred.

     Advertising costs

      Advertising costs are expensed as incurred. Total advertising and promotional expenses were $4.9 million $7.1 million and $12.8 million in the years ended December 31, 2001, 2002 and 2003, respectively.

     Income taxes

      The Company accounts for income taxes under the liability method, which recognizes deferred tax assets and liabilities determined based on the difference between the financial statement and tax basis of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to affect taxable income. Valuation allowances are established to reduce deferred tax assets when, based on available objective evidence, it is more likely than not that the benefit of such assets will not be realized.

     Stock-based compensation

      Pursuant to SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation,” the Company accounts for employee stock options under Accounting Principles Board Opinion (“APB”) No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees,” and follows the disclosure-only provisions of SFAS No. 123. Under APB No. 25, compensation expense is based on the difference, if any, on the date of the grant, between the estimated fair value of the Company’s common stock and the exercise price of options to purchase that stock. For purposes of estimating the compensation cost of the Company’s option grants in accordance with SFAS No. 123, the fair value of each option grant is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model.

F-11



Table of Contents

NETGEAR, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

      Had compensation cost for the Company’s stock-based compensation plan been determined based on the fair value at the grant dates for the awards under a method prescribed by SFAS No. 123, the Company’s net income (loss) would have been adjusted to the amounts indicated below (in thousands, except per share data):

                           
Year Ended December 31,

2001 2002 2003



Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders, as reported
  $ (19,484 )   $ (9,742 )   $ 13,097  
Add: Employee stock-based compensation included in reported net income (loss)
          1,581       1,773  
Less: Total employee stock-based compensation determined under fair value method
    (5,723 )     (5,558 )     (5,846 )
     
     
     
 
Adjusted net loss attributable to common stockholders
  $ (25,207 )   $ (13,719 )   $ 9,024  
     
     
     
 
Basic net income (loss) per share attributable to common stockholders:
                       
 
As reported
  $ (0.66 )   $ (0.46 )   $ 0.55  
     
     
     
 
 
Adjusted
  $ (0.85 )   $ (0.65 )   $ 0.38  
     
     
     
 
Diluted net income (loss) per share attributable to common stockholders:
                       
 
As reported
  $ (0.66 )   $ (0.46 )   $ 0.49  
     
     
     
 
 
Adjusted
  $ (0.85 )   $ (0.65 )   $ 0.34  
     
     
     
 

     Comprehensive income

      Under SFAS 130, “Reporting Comprehensive Income,” the Company is required to display comprehensive income and its components as part of the financial statements. The Company has displayed its comprehensive income as part of the consolidated statements of stockholders equity (deficit). Other comprehensive income for the year ended December 31, 2003 was a $13,000 unrealized gain on available-for-sale securities. There were no items of other comprehensive income in the years ended December 31, 2001 or 2002.

     Foreign currency translation

      The Company uses the U.S. dollar as its functional currency for all of its international subsidiaries. Foreign currency assets and liabilities are translated into U.S. dollars at the end-of-period exchange rates except for fixed assets, which are translated at historical exchange rates. Expenses are translated at average exchange rates in effect during each period, except for those expenses related to balance sheet amounts, which are translated at historical exchange rates. Gains or losses arising from foreign currency transactions are included in net income (loss) and were immaterial for all periods being reported.

     Recent accounting pronouncements

      In November 2002, the EITF reached a consensus on Issue 00-21, “Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables.” EITF Issue 00-21 provides guidance on how to account for arrangements that involve the delivery or performance of multiple products, services and/or rights to use assets. The provisions of EITF Issue 00-21 applies to revenue arrangements entered into in reporting periods beginning after June 15, 2003. The adoption of EITF Issue 00-21 did not have a material impact on the financial position, results of operations or cash flows of the Company.

F-12



Table of Contents

NETGEAR, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

      In December 2003, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued a revision to Interpretation number 46, “Consolidation of variable interest entities, and interpretation of ARB Opinion No. 51 (FIN 46R).” FIN 46R clarifies the application of ARB 51 “Consolidated Financial Statements,” to certain entities in which equity investors do not have the characteristics of a controlling financial interest or do not have sufficient equity at risk for the entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support provided by any parties, including the equity holders. FIN 46R requires the consolidation of these entities, known as variable interest entities (“VIE’s”), by the primary beneficiary of the entity. The primary beneficiary is the entity, if any, that will absorb a majority of the entity’s expected losses, receive a majority of the entity’s expected residual returns, or both.

      Among other changes, the revisions of FIN 46R (a) clarified some requirements of the original FIN 46, which had been issued in January 2003, (b) eased some implementation problems, and (c) added new scope exceptions. FIN 46R deferred the effective date of the interpretation for public companies to the end of the first reporting period ending after March 15, 2004, except that all public companies must at a minimum apply the unmodified provisions of the interpretation to entities that were previously considered “special-purpose entities” in practice and under the FASB literature prior to the issuance of FIN 46R by the end of the first reporting period ending after December 15, 2003.

      Among the scope exceptions, companies are not required to apply FIN 46R to an entity that meets the criteria to be considered a “business” as defined in the interpretation unless one or more of four named conditions exist. FIN 46R applies immediately to a VIE created or acquired after January 31, 2003. The company does not have any interests in VIE’s, and the adoption of FIN 46R is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

Note 2 — Balance Sheet Components (In thousands):

     Available-for-sale short-term investments consist of the following:

                                                 
December 31,

2002 2003


Unrealized Estimated Unrealized Estimated
Cost Gains/(Losses) Fair Value Cost Gains/(Losses) Fair Value






Government Securities
                    $ 12,377     $ 13     $ 12,390  
     
     
     
     
     
     
 
Totals
                    $ 12,377     $ 13     $ 12,390  
     
     
     
     
     
     
 

     Accounts receivable and related allowances consist of the following:

                     
December 31,

2002 2003


Gross accounts receivable
  $ 49,780     $ 83,639  
     
     
 
Less: Allowance for doubtful accounts
    (873 )     (1,322 )
 
 Allowance for sales returns
    (3,363 )     (4,845 )
 
 Allowance for price protection
    (3,052 )     (2,606 )
     
     
 
   
 Total allowances
    (7,288 )     (8,773 )
     
     
 
Accounts receivable, net
  $ 42,492     $ 74,866  
     
     
 

F-13



Table of Contents

NETGEAR, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

     Inventories consist of the following:

                 
December 31,

2002 2003


Finished goods
  $ 24,774     $ 39,266  
     
     
 

     Property and Equipment, net consists of the following:

                 
December 31,

2002 2003


Computer equipment
  $ 2,129     $ 2,722  
Furniture, fixtures and leasehold improvements
    399       794  
Software
    2,878       3,236  
Machinery
    1,032       2,216  
Construction in progress
    41        
     
     
 
      6,479       8,968  
Less: Accumulated depreciation and amortization
    (3,335 )     (5,342 )
     
     
 
    $ 3,144     $ 3,626  
     
     
 

      Depreciation expense in 2001, 2002 and 2003 was $950,000, $1.4 million and $2.0 million, respectively.

      In accordance with SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets,” goodwill amortization was discontinued as of January 1, 2002. The carrying value of goodwill at December 31, 2002 and 2003 was $558,000, net of $1.1 million of accumulated amortization. Management has determined that the net book value of the goodwill has not been impaired.

      The following table reflects consolidated results of operations adjusted as though the adoption of SFAS No. 142 occurred as of January 1, 2001 (in thousands):

         
Year Ended
December 31,

2001

Reported net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders
  $ (19,484 )
Goodwill amortization
    335  
     
 
Adjusted net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders
  $ (19,149 )
     
 
Basic net income (loss) per share attributable to common stockholders
  $ (0.66 )
Goodwill amortization
    0.01  
     
 
Adjusted basic net income (loss) per share attributable to common stockholders
  $ (0.65 )
     
 
Diluted net income (loss) per share attributable to common stockholders
  $ (0.66 )
Goodwill amortization
    0.01  
     
 
Adjusted diluted net income (loss) per share attributable to common stockholders
  $ (0.65 )
     
 

F-14



Table of Contents

NETGEAR, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

     Other accrued liabilities consist of the following;

                 
December 31,

2002 2003


Sales and marketing programs
  $ 13,855     $ 14,207  
Warranty obligation
    8,941       11,959  
Outsourced engineering costs
    1,588       1,604  
Freight
    2,593       937  
Other
    2,442       2,592  
     
     
 
    $ 29,419     $ 31,299  
     
     
 

Note 3 — Related Party Transactions:

     Manufacturing Agreement with Delta Electronics

      Some of the Company’s products are manufactured by Delta Electronics, which is associated with Delta International Holding Ltd., a shareholder in NETGEAR. Product purchases from Delta Electronics amounted to $81.0 million, $121.3 million and $68.6 million during the years ended December 31, 2001, 2002 and 2003, respectively. Payables related to these purchases amounted to $13.0 million and $6.4 million at December 31, 2002 and 2003, respectively, and are included in payables to related parties in the accompanying balance sheets.

     Other Related Party Transactions

      As consideration for services received in relation to the issuance of Series C Preferred Stock (see Note 8), in March 2002 the Company issued a warrant to one of its shareholders to purchase 218,750 shares of common stock. The warrant was fully exercisable on the day of grant. The warrant was due to expire in the event of an initial public offering provided that the aggregate gross proceeds from the offering are not less than $35.0 million and the valuation of the Company is at least $250.0 million, but would otherwise expire on March 13, 2007. Immediately prior to the Company’s initial public offering the warrant was exercised in a cashless exercise involving the simultaneous exercise of the warrant and the surrender of some of the shares of common stock issued as payment for the exercise price. As such a net of 198,593 shares of common stock were issued pursuant to the terms of the warrant. The Company determined the fair value of the warrant using Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions: exercise price — $1.29 per share, estimated fair value of the common stock — $6.24, volatility — 71%, dividend rate — 0%, risk free interest rate — 4.30%, expected life — 4 years. The fair value of the warrant of $622,000 was recorded against the proceeds of Series C Preferred Stock.

Note 4 — Net Income (Loss) Per Share:

      Immediately prior to the effective date of the Company’s initial public offering on July 30, 2003, the Company’s outstanding Preferred Stock was automatically converted into 20,228,480 shares of common stock. Prior to July 30, 2003, the holders of Series A, B and C Preferred Stock were entitled to participate in all dividends paid on common stock, as and when declared by the Board of Directors, on an as-if converted basis. In accordance with EITF Topic D-95, “Effect of Participating Convertible Securities on the Computation of Basic Earnings per Share,” the Company has included the impact of Preferred Stock in the computation of basic earnings per share using the “two class” method. Under this method, an earnings allocation formula is used to determine the amount of net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders to be allocated to each class of stock (the two classes being common stock and Preferred Stock). Basic net income (loss) per share attributable to common stockholders is calculated by dividing the amount of net

F-15



Table of Contents

NETGEAR, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

income (loss) attributable to common shareholders that is apportioned to common stock by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. Although there were no common shares outstanding during 2001 and 2002, basic net loss per share attributable to common stockholders is presented, as there were potential common shares outstanding (representing Preferred Stock) during the period. This per share data is based on the net loss, which would be attributable to one share of common stock during each period, after apportioning the loss to reflect the participation rights of the preferred stockholders.

      Net income (loss) per share applicable to each class of stock (common stock and Preferred Stock) is as follows (in thousands, except per share data):

                   
Year Ended December 31, 2001

Common Stock Preferred Stock


Basic net loss per share:
               
 
Apportioned net loss
          $ (19,484 )
             
 
 
Total numerator for basic net loss per share
          $ (19,484 )
             
 
 
Weighted average basic shares outstanding
            29,571  
             
 
Basic net loss per share
  $ (0.66 )(A)   $ (0.66 )
     
     
 
                   
Year Ended December 31, 2002

Common Stock Preferred Stock


Basic net income (loss) per share:
               
 
Apportioned net loss after deemed dividend to Preferred Stock
          $ (9,742 )
 
Deemed dividend to Preferred Stock
            17,881  
             
 
 
Total numerator for basic net income (loss) per share
          $ 8,139  
             
 
 
Weighted average basic shares outstanding
            21,181  
             
 
Net income (loss) per share
  $ (0.46 )(A)   $ 0.38  
     
     
 
                   
Year Ended December 31, 2003

Common Stock Preferred Stock


Basic net income per share:
               
 
Apportioned net income
  $ 6,621     $ 6,476  
     
     
 
 
Total numerator for basic net income per share
  $ 6,621     $ 6,476  
     
     
 
 
Weighted average basic shares outstanding
    11,958       11,695  
     
     
 
Basic net income per share
  $ 0.55     $ 0.55  
     
     
 

F-16



Table of Contents

NETGEAR, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

           
December 31,
2003

Common Stock

Diluted net income per share:
       
 
Apportioned net income
  $ 13,097  
     
 
 
Total numerator for diluted net income per share
  $ 13,097  
     
 
Weighted average shares outstanding:
       
 
Basic
    11,958  
 
Conversion of preferred stock
    11,695  
 
Options and warrants
    3,147  
     
 
 
Total diluted
    26,800  
     
 
Diluted net income per share
  $ 0.49  
     
 

(A):  As described above, these amounts represent the amount of net loss after deemed dividend to Preferred Stock which would be apportioned to one share of common stock.

      Diluted net income (loss) per share attributable to common stockholders for 2001 and 2002 is the same as basic net income (loss) per share attributable to common stockholders because the impact of including common stock equivalents would not be dilutive.

      Anti-dilutive common stock options and warrants amounting to 6,695,592, 3,021,893 and 175,000 were excluded from the weighted average shares outstanding from the diluted per share calculation for 2001, 2002 and 2003, respectively.

Note 5 — Income Taxes:

      The provision for income taxes consists of the following (in thousands):

                           
Year Ended December 31,

2001 2002 2003



Current:
                       
 
U.S. federal
  $ (546 )   $ 378     $ 4,282  
 
State
    (154 )     662       513  
 
Foreign
    300       293       737  
     
     
     
 
      (400 )     1,333       5,532  
     
     
     
 
Deferred:
                       
 
U.S. federal
    2,702             (7,908 )
 
State
    770             (1,148 )
     
     
     
 
      3,472             (9,056 )
     
     
     
 
Total
  $ 3,072     $ 1,333     $ (3,524 )
     
     
     
 

F-17



Table of Contents

NETGEAR, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

      Deferred tax assets and liabilities consist of the following (in thousands):

                   
December 31,

2002 2003


Deferred tax assets:
               
 
Net operating loss carry-forwards
  $ 182     $ 180  
 
Accruals and allowances
    9,275       9,050  
 
Other
    33        
     
     
 
      9,490       9,230  
     
     
 
Deferred tax liabilities:
               
 
Depreciation and goodwill amortization
    (317 )     (174 )
     
     
 
      (317 )     (174 )
     
     
 
Gross deferred tax assets
    9,173       9,056  
Valuation allowance
    (9,173 )      
     
     
 
Net deferred tax assets
  $     $ 9,056  
     
     
 

      As of December 31, 2003, the Company had approximately $3.1 million of California state net operating loss carry-forwards available to offset future taxable income. These net-operating losses will begin to expire in 2013.

      During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003, the Company reassessed its ability to realize its deferred tax assets and determined that it is more likely than not that future benefits will be realized. This determination was made principally based on the cumulative profitability of the Company over the past several quarters, plus the projected current and future taxable income expected to be generated by the Company.

      Accordingly, the Company fully reversed the valuation allowance of $9,772,000 in the second quarter of the year ended December 31, 2003 to reflect the anticipated net deferred tax asset utilization.

      The effective tax rate differs from the applicable U.S. statutory federal income tax rate as follows:

                         
Year Ended December 31,

2001 2002 2003



Tax at federal statutory rate
    (34.0 )%     34.0 %     35.0 %
State, net of federal benefit
    (4.6 )     9.6       4.3  
Stock-based compensation
    0.0       2.7       7.3  
Non-deductible interest charges
    0.0       2.2       27.1  
Tax credits
    (0.4 )     0.0       (6.4 )
Other
    1.0       6.0       (2.0 )
Change in valuation allowance
    56.7       (40.4 )     (102.1 )
     
     
     
 
Provision (Benefit) for taxes
    18.7 %     14.1 %     (36.8 )%
     
     
     
 

F-18



Table of Contents

NETGEAR, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

Note 6 — Borrowings:

     Lines of credit

      On July 25, 2002, the Company entered into a revolving line of credit agreement with a bank that provides for a maximum line of credit of up to $20.0 million including amounts drawn under letters of credit. Availability under the line of credit is equal to 75% of eligible accounts receivable balances as determined in the agreement. The annualized interest rate of the bank’s prime rate plus 0.75% is charged on the outstanding credit balance, calculated on a daily basis. Substantially all the Company’s assets are collateralized under the line of credit. Per the line of credit agreement, the bank can issue letters of credit of up to an aggregate face amount of $2.0 million. Prior to the closing of the Company’s initial public offering the line of credit contained covenants, including but not limited to certain financial covenants based on earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, or EBITDA, and tangible net worth, and did not allow for declaration of dividends. Subsequent to the Company’s initial public offering, the line of credit no longer contains the aforementioned covenants but rather requires the Company to maintain a ratio of quick assets to current liabilities of at least 1.25 : 1.00, as of the last day of each calendar month. The Company is not required to maintain compensating balances, however, it is required to pay a fee of 0.25% per annum on the unused portion of the total facility and 1.50% per annum for letters of credit. During the year ended December 31, 2002 and 2003, the Company was in compliance with all of the covenants.

     Letters of credit

      As collateral for the Company’s payment obligations to certain third parties who provide inventory warehousing and distribution services, the Company is contingently liable under letters of credit for an aggregate of $756,000 and $360,000 at December 31, 2002 and 2003, respectively. No amount has been drawn under these letters of credit as of December 31, 2002 and 2003.

Note 7 — Commitments:

     Employments Agreements

      The Company has signed various employment agreements with key executives pursuant to which if their employment is terminated without cause, the employees are entitled to receive their base salary (and commission or bonus, as applicable) for 52 weeks (for the Chief Executive Officer), 39 weeks (for the Chief Financial Officer and for the President) and 26 weeks (for other key executives), and will continue to have stock options vest for a one year period following the termination. If the termination, without cause, occurs within one year of a change in control, the officer is entitled to two years acceleration of any unvested portion of his or her stock options.

     Leases

      The Company leases office space and equipment under non-cancelable operating leases with various expiration dates through March 2006. Rent expense in the years ended, December 31, 2001, 2002 and 2003 was $1.2 million, $959,000 and $1.1 million, respectively. The terms of the facility lease provides for rental payments on a graduated scale. The Company recognizes rent expense on a straight-line basis over the lease period, and has accrued for rent expense incurred but not paid.

F-19



Table of Contents

NETGEAR, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

      Future minimum lease payments under non-cancelable operating and capital leases are as follows (in thousands):

         
Operating
Year Ending December 31, Leases


2004
  $ 1,033  
2005
    153  
2006
    26  
     
 
Total minimum lease payments
  $ 1,212  
     
 

     Guarantees, Indemnifications

      The Company entered into various inventory related purchase agreements with suppliers. Under these agreements, 50% of orders are cancelable by giving notice 46 to 60 days prior to the expected shipment date, 25% of orders are cancelable by giving notice 31 to 45 days prior to the expected shipment date. Orders are noncancelable within 30 days prior to the expected shipment date. At December 31, 2003, the Company had $27.5 million in noncancelable purchase commitments with suppliers. The Company expects to sell all products for which it has committed to purchase from suppliers.

      During 2001, the Company entered into an agreement with a service provider with respect to legal consultative and other services in international jurisdictions. Under the agreement, the Company agreed to indemnify the service provider to the fullest extent permitted by law against claims, suits and legal and other expenses incurred by the service provider in the course of providing such services. The terms of the indemnity agreement remain in effect until modified by the parties to the agreement. The maximum amount of potential future indemnification is unlimited. To date the Company has not received any claims against this agreement and believes the fair value of the indemnification agreement is minimal. Accordingly, the Company has no liabilities recorded for these agreements as at December 31, 2003.

      The Company also, as permitted under Delaware law and in accordance with its Bylaws, indemnifies its officers and directors for certain events or occurrences, subject to certain limits, while the officer is or was serving at the Company’s request in such capacity. The term of the indemnification period is for the officer’s or director’s lifetime. The maximum amount of potential future indemnification is unlimited; however, the Company has a Director and Officer Insurance Policy that limits its exposure and enables it to recover a portion of any future amounts paid. As a result of its insurance policy coverage, the Company believes the fair value of these indemnification agreements is minimal. Accordingly, the Company has no liabilities recorded for these agreements as at December 31, 2003.

      In its sales agreements, the Company typically agrees to indemnify its distributors and resellers for any expenses or liability resulting from claimed infringements of patents, trademarks or copyrights of third parties. The terms of these indemnification agreements are generally perpetual any time after execution of the agreement. The maximum amount of potential future indemnification is unlimited. To date the Company has not paid any amounts to settle claims or defend lawsuits. As a result, the Company believes the estimated fair value of these agreements is minimal. Accordingly, the Company has no liabilities recorded for these agreements as of December 31, 2003.

F-20



Table of Contents

NETGEAR, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

Note 8 — Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock (“Preferred Stock”):

      The following table summarizes the activity of Preferred Stock (in thousands, except share data):

                                                                 
Series A Series B Series C Total




Shares Amount Shares Amount Shares Amount Shares Amount








Balances at January 1, 2002
    26,250,000     $ 29,123       3,320,537     $ 14,955           $       29,570,537     $ 44,078  
Issuance of Preferred Stock (net of issuance cost $1,833)
                            10,937,406       3,368       10,937,406       3,368  
Repurchase of Preferred Stock
    (20,273,918 )     (17,275 )                             (20,273,918 )     (17,275 )
Deemed Preferred Stock dividend
          (5,218 )                       23,099             17,881  
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
 
Balances at December 31, 2002
    5,976,082       6,630       3,320,537       14,955       10,937,406       26,467       20,234,025       48,052  
Repurchase of Preferred Stock
    (2,525 )     (6 )                 (3,020 )     (7 )     (5,545 )     (13 )
Conversion of Preferred Stock into common stock
    (5,973,557 )     (6,624 )     (3,320,537 )     (14,955 )     (10,934,386 )     (26,460 )     (20,228,480 )     (48,039 )
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
 
Balances at December 31, 2003
        $           $           $           $  
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
 

      As of December 31, 2003, 5,000,000 shares of Preferred Stock had been authorized, of which no amount was outstanding.

 
Note 9 — Common Stock:

      The Company’s Certificate of Incorporation, as amended, authorizes the Company to issue 200,000,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock. There were 28,618,969 shares of common stock outstanding at December 31, 2003.

 
Note 10 — Stock Option Plans:

          2000 Stock Option Plan

      In April 2000, the Company adopted the 2000 Stock Option Plan (the “Plan”). The Plan provides for the granting of stock options to employees and consultants of the Company. Options granted under the Plan may be either incentive stock options or nonqualified stock options. Incentive stock options (“ISO”) may be granted only to Company employees (including officers and directors who are also employees). Nonqualified stock options (“NSO”) may be granted to Company employees and consultants. The Company has reserved 7,350,000 shares of Common Stock for issuance under the Plan.

      Options under the Plan may be granted for periods of up to ten years and at prices no less than the estimated fair value of the shares on the date of grant as determined by the Board of Directors, provided, however, that (i) the exercise price of an ISO and NSO shall not be less than the estimated fair value of the shares on the date of grant, respectively, and (ii) the exercise price of an ISO and NSO granted to a 10% shareholder shall not be less than 110% of the estimated fair value of the shares on the date of grant, respectively. To date, options granted generally vest over four years.

          2003 Stock Plan

      In April 2003, the Company adopted the 2003 Stock Plan (the “Plan”). The Plan provides for the granting of stock options to employees and consultants of the Company. Options granted under the Plan may be either incentive stock options or nonqualified stock options. Incentive stock options (“ISO”) may be

F-21



Table of Contents

NETGEAR, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

granted only to Company employees (including officers and directors who are also employees). Nonqualified stock options (“NSO”) may be granted to Company employees and consultants. The Company has reserved 750,000 shares of Common Stock plus any shares which were reserved but not issued under the Company’s 2000 Stock Option Plan as of the date of the approval of the 2003 Stock Plan, The number of shares which were reserved but not issued under the Company’s 2000 Stock Option Plan that were transferred to the Company’s 2003 Stock Plan were 615,290, which when combined which the stock option allocation for the Company’s 2003 Stock Plan give a total of 1,365,290 under the Company’s 2003 Stock Plan as of the date of transfer. As of December 31, 2003, 1,396,412 shares were reserved for issuance under the Company’s 2003 Stock Plan.

      Options under the Plan may be granted for periods of up to ten years and at prices no less than the estimated fair value of the common stock on the date of grant as determined by the closing sales price for such stock as quoted on any established stock exchange or a national market system, provided, however, that (i) the exercise price of an ISO and NSO shall not be less than the estimated fair value of the shares on the date of grant, respectively, and (ii) the exercise price of an ISO and NSO granted to a 10% shareholder shall not be less than 110% of the estimated fair value of the shares on the date of grant, respectively. To date, options granted generally vest over four years, the first tranche at the end of twelve months and the remaining options vesting monthly over the remaining three years.

          Stock based compensation

      For financial reporting purposes, the Company determined that the estimated value of the common stock determined in anticipation of the Company’s initial public offering was in excess of the exercise price, which was deemed to be the fair market value as of the dates of grant. In connection with the grants of such options, the Company recorded deferred stock based compensation of $6.7 million in the year ended December 31, 2002 and $1.0 million in the year ended December 31, 2003. For the year ended December 31, 2002 and December 31, 2003, respectively, the amortization of non-cash deferred stock-based compensation was $1.6 million and $1.8 million, respectively.

      Activity under the combined Company’s 2000 and 2003 Stock Option Plans is set forth as follows:

                                                   
Year Ended December 31,

2001 2002 2003



Average Average Average
Exercise Exercise Exercise
Shares Price Shares Price Shares Price






Options outstanding at January 1
    5,134,900     $ 5.39       4,706,349     $ 5.40       6,433,092     $ 4.68  
 
Options granted
    514,937       8.57       2,470,041       3.99       654,735       12.14  
 
Options exercised
                            (141,896 )     5.67  
 
Options cancelled
    (943,488 )     7.09       (743,298 )     6.88       (384,238 )     4.93  
     
             
             
         
Outstanding at end of period
    4,706,349       5.40       6,433,092       4.68       6,561,693       5.39  
     
             
             
         
Options exercisable at end of period
    2,188,058       5.17       3,256,417       4.69       4,654,024       4.88  
     
             
             
         

F-22



Table of Contents

NETGEAR, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

      Additional information regarding stock options outstanding under the Company’s 2000 Stock Option Plan and 2003 Stock Plan as of December 31, 2003 is as follows:

                                         
Options Outstanding

Weighted Options Exercisable
Average
Remaining Weighted Weighted
Contractual Average Average
Number Life (in Exercise Number Exercise
Range of Exercise Price Outstanding Years) Price Outstanding Price






$1.29-$2.99
    740,983       8.0     $ 1.29       429,378     $ 1.29  
$3.00-$5.99
    4,037,668       6.7     $ 4.58       3,484,681     $ 4.55  
$6.00-$8.99
    1,274,431       7.7     $ 7.23       637,814     $ 7.40  
$9.00-$11.99
    273,186       9.2     $ 11.00       656     $ 11.00  
$12.00-$14.99
    60,000       9.6     $ 14.00           $  
$15.00-$17.99
    175,425       9.9     $ 16.25       101,495     $ 15.34  
     
                     
         
$1.29-$17.99
    6,561,693       7.2     $ 5.39       4,654,024     $ 4.88  
     
                     
         

      The fair value of each option grant under the Company’s stock option plan is estimated on the date of grant using the fair value method, using the following weighted average assumptions:

                         
Year Ended December 31,

2001 2002 2003



Risk free interest rate
    4.81 %     3.14 %     2.68 %
Expected life (years)
    4       4       4  
Expected dividends
  $     $     $  
Volatility
    71 %     71 %     71 %

      The weighted average fair value of options granted during 2001, 2002 and 2003 was $4.86, $4.45 and $8.37, respectively.

Note 11 — Employee Stock Purchase Plans:

      In April 2003, the Company adopted the Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the “Purchase Plan”) under which 500,000 shares have been reserved for issuance. The Purchase Plan permits purchases of common stock via payroll deductions. The maximum payroll deduction is 10% of the employee’s cash compensation. Purchases of the common stock will occur on February 1 and August 1 of each year. The price of each share purchased will be 85% of the lower of:

      The fair market value per share of common stock on the first trading day of each offering period (which lasts 6 months); or

      The fair market value per share of common stock on the first trading day on or subsequent to the last day of the offering period, if it falls on a weekend or Government holiday.

      The value of the shares purchased in any calendar year may not exceed $25,000.

      As of December 31, 2003 there had not been any payroll deductions and no shares had been issued under the Purchase Plan.

 
Note 12 — Segment Information, Operations by Geographic Area and Customers Concentration:

      Operating segments are components of an enterprise about which separate financial information is available and is regularly evaluated by management, namely the chief operating decision maker of an

F-23



Table of Contents

NETGEAR, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

organization, in order to make operating and resource allocation decisions. By this definition, the Company primarily operates in one business segment, which comprises the development, marketing and sale of networking products for the small business and home markets. NETGEAR’s primary headquarter functions and a significant portion of its operations are located in the United States. The Company also conducts sales, marketing, customer service activities and certain distribution center activities through several small sales offices in Europe, Middle-East and Africa (EMEA) and Asia as well outsourced distribution centers. Geographic revenue information is based on the location of the reseller or distributor.

      Long-lived assets, primarily fixed assets, are reported below based on the location of the asset.

     Geographic information

      Net revenue consist of (in thousands):

                         
Year Ended December 31,

2001 2002 2003



North America
  $ 121,688     $ 150,096     $ 172,885  
United Kingdom
    20,701       23,919       35,415  
Germany
    16,156       23,963       34,422  
EMEA (excluding United Kingdom and Germany)
    16,120       20,124       29,585  
Asia Pacific and rest of world
    17,775       19,229       26,995  
     
     
     
 
    $ 192,440     $ 237,331     $ 299,302  
     
     
     
 

      Long-lived assets consist of (in thousands):

                 
December 31,

2002 2003


North America
  $ 3,074     $ 3,260  
EMEA
    12       45  
Asia Pacific
    58       321  
     
     
 
    $ 3,144     $ 3,626  
     
     
 

      Customer Concentration: (as a percentage of net revenue):

                         
Year Ended
December 31,

Customer 2001 2002 2003




A
    36%       32%       31%  
B
    23%       20%       15%  
 
NOTE 13 — Employee Benefit Plan:

      In April 2000, the Company adopted the NETGEAR 401(k) Plan to which employees could contribute up to 15% of salary subject to the legal maximum. The Company contributes an amount equal to 50% of the first 5% of the employees’ contribution. The maximum Company contribution is $1,500 per year per employee. The Company expensed $80,000, $130,000 and $233,000 related to the NETGEAR 401(k) Plan in the years ended December 31, 2001, 2002 and 2003, respectively.

F-24



Table of Contents



9,000,000 Shares

(NETGEAR LOGO)

Common Stock


PROSPECTUS
                        , 2004

LEHMAN BROTHERS

GOLDMAN, SACHS & CO.

         NEEDHAM & COMPANY, INC.

PACIFIC GROWTH EQUITIES, LLC

JMP SECURITIES

HARRIS NESBITT GERARD



Table of Contents

PART II

INFORMATION NOT REQUIRED IN PROSPECTUS

 
Item 13. Other Expenses of Issuance and Distribution.

      The following table sets forth all costs and expenses, other than the underwriting discounts and commissions payable by the selling stockholders, in connection with this offering. All amounts shown are estimates except for the registration fee and the NASD filing fee.

           
Amount to be
Paid

SEC registration fee
  $ 19,638  
NASD filing fee
    16,000  
Printing and engraving
    150,000  
Legal fees and expenses
    200,000  
Accounting fees and expenses
    100,000  
Blue sky fees and expenses (including legal fees)
    10,000  
Transfer agent and registrar fees
    20,000  
Miscellaneous
    9,362  
     
 
 
Total
  $ 525,000  
     
 
 
Item 14. Indemnification of Officers and Directors.

      Section 145 of the Delaware General Corporation Law authorizes a court to award, or a corporation’s board of directors to grant, indemnity to officers, directors and other corporate agents in terms sufficiently broad to permit such indemnification under certain circumstances and subject to certain limitations.

      The registrant’s certificate of incorporation and bylaws provide that the registrant shall indemnify its directors, officers, employees and agents to the full extent permitted by Delaware General Corporation Law, including in circumstances in which indemnification is otherwise discretionary under Delaware law.

      In addition, the registrant has entered into separate indemnification agreements with its directors, officers and certain employees which requires the registrant, among other things, to indemnify them against certain liabilities which may arise by reason of their status as directors, officers or certain other employees. The registrant also intends to maintain director and officer liability insurance, if available on reasonable terms.

      These indemnification provisions and the indemnification agreements entered into between the registrant and its officers and directors may be sufficiently broad to permit indemnification of the registrant’s officers and directors for liabilities (including reimbursement of expenses incurred) arising under the Securities Act.

      The underwriting agreement filed as Exhibit 1.1 to this registration statement provides for indemnification by the underwriters of the registrant and its officers and directors for certain liabilities arising under the Securities Act, or otherwise.

 
Item 15. Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities.

      The registrant has sold and issued the following securities since March 1, 2001:

        (a) On July 30, 2003, we issued options to purchase an aggregate of 60,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $14.00 per share to A. Timothy Godwin and Ralph E. Faison, members of our board of directors.

II-1



Table of Contents

        (b) On July 30, 2003, we issued and sold 6,632 shares of our common stock to an optionholder upon exercise of options at an exercise price of $1.29
 
        (c) On July 25, 2003, issued and sold 11,082 shares of our common stock to an optionholder upon exercise of options at an exercise price of $4.51.
 
        (d) On July 11, 2003, we issued options to purchase an aggregate of 176,274 shares of our common stock at a weighted exercise price of $10.28 per share to certain employees.
 
        (e) On May 19, 2003, we issued and sold 2,466 shares of our common stock to an optionholder upon exercise of options at a weighted exercise price of $4.94.
 
        (f) On February 3, 2003, we issued options to purchase an aggregate of 7,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $8.57 per share to an employee.
 
        (g) On January 6, 2003, we issued options to purchase an aggregate of 122,500 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $8.57 per share to an employee.
 
        (h) On December 16, 2002, we issued options to purchase an aggregate of 10,500 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $8.57 per share to certain employees.
 
        (i) On December 6, 2002, we issued options to purchase an aggregate of 53,375 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $8.57 per share to certain employees.
 
        (j) On November 4, 2002, we issued options to purchase an aggregate of 105,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $6.00 per share to an employee.
 
        (k) On October 31, 2002, we issued options to purchase an aggregate of 293,650 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $6.00 per share to certain employees.
 
        (l) On October 30, 2002, we issued options to purchase an aggregate of 220,123 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $6.00 per share to certain employees pursuant to our 2002 stock option exchange program.
 
        (m) On September 30, 2002, we issued options to purchase an aggregate of 5,250 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $6.00 per share to an employee.
 
        (n) On September 11, 2002, we issued options to purchase an aggregate of 61,250 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $6.00 per share to Linwood A. Lacy, Jr., a member of our board of directors.
 
        (o) On August 31, 2002, we issued options to purchase an aggregate of 70,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $5.54 per share to certain employees.
 
        (p) On July 31, 2002, we issued options to purchase an aggregate of 464,292 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $5.10 per share to certain employees.
 
        (q) On June 30, 2002, we issued options to purchase an aggregate of 90,125 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $4.65 per share to certain employees.
 
        (r) On May 31, 2002, we issued options to purchase an aggregate of 109,375 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $4.21 per share to certain employees.
 
        (s) On April 30, 2002, we issued options to purchase an aggregate of 54,250 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $3.76 per share to certain employees.
 
        (t) On April 22, 2002, we issued options to purchase an aggregate of 43,750 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $3.31 per share to Michael Ressner, a former member of our board of directors.

II-2



Table of Contents

        (u)  On March 31, 2002, we issued options to purchase an aggregate of 81,095 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $3.31 per share to certain employees.
 
        (v)  On March 13, 2002, we granted a fully vested warrant to purchase an aggregate of 218,750 shares of our common stock to Shamrock Capital Advisors, Inc. at an exercise price of $1.29 per share.
 
        (w)  On February 8, 2002, we issued options to purchase an aggregate of 851,756 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $1.29 per share to certain employees.
 
        (x) On February 7, 2002, we issued and sold an aggregate of 10,937,386 shares of Series C Preferred Stock to our investors at the time at a purchase price of $1.29 per share. The Series C Preferred Stock is convertible into an equal number of shares of common stock, subject to future adjustments for dilution.
 
        (y) On April 26, 2001, we issued options to purchase an aggregate of 90,125 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $8.57 per share to certain employees.
 
        (z) On March 20, 2001, we issued options to purchase an aggregate of 52,500 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $8.57 per share to certain employees.

      The issuance of securities describe in item 15(a) through 15(bb) were deemed to be exempt from registration under the Securities Act in reliance on Section 4(2) or Rule 701 of the Securities Act as transactions by an issuer not involving any public offering. The recipients of securities in each such transaction represented their intention to acquire the securities for investment only and not with a view to or for sale in connection with any distribution thereof and appropriate legends were affixed to the share certificates and other instruments issued in such transactions. The sale of these securities were made without general solicitation or advertising.

Item 16.     Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedule.

      (a) The following exhibits are filed herewith:

         
Exhibit
Number Exhibit Title


  1 .1*   Form of Underwriting Agreement.
  3 .1   Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of registrant. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.3 of the registration statement on Form S-1 of the Registrant, file no. 333-104419.
  3 .2   Bylaws of the registrant. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit number 3.5 to the registration statement on Form S-1 of the Registrant, file no. 333-104419.
  4 .1   Form of registrant’s common stock certificate. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit number 4.1 to the registration statement on Form S-1 of the Registrant, file no. 333-104419.
  4 .2   Amended and Restated Investor Rights Agreement, dated February 7, 2002, by and between the registrant and the individuals and entities listed therein. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit number 4.2 to the registration statement on Form S-1 of the Registrant, file no. 333-104419.
  5 .1*   Opinion of Wilson, Sonsini, Goodrich & Rosati, P.C.
  10 .1   Form of Indemnification Agreement for directors and officers. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit number 10.1 to the registration statement on Form S-1 of the Registrant, file no. 333-104419.
  10 .2   2000 Stock Option Plan and forms of agreements thereunder. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit number 10.2 to the registration statement on Form S-1 of the Registrant, file no. 333-104419.
  10 .3   2003 Stock Plan and forms of agreements thereunder. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit number 10.3 to the registration statement on Form S-1 of the Registrant, file no. 333-104419.

II-3



Table of Contents

         
Exhibit
Number Exhibit Title


  10 .4   2003 Employee Stock Purchase Plan. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit number 10.4 to the registration statement on Form S-1 of the Registrant, file no. 333-104419.
  10 .5   Employment Agreement, dated December 3, 1999, between the registrant and Patrick C.S. Lo. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit number 10.5 to the registration statement on Form S-1 of the Registrant, file no. 333-104419.
  10 .6   Employment Agreement, dated July 15, 2002, between the registrant and Ray Robidoux. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit number 10.6 to the registration statement on Form S-1 of the Registrant, file no. 333-104419.
  10 .7   Employment Agreement, dated August 10, 2001, between the registrant and Jonathan R. Mather. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit number 10.7 to the registration statement on Form S-1 of the Registrant, file no. 333-104419.
  10 .8   Employment Agreement, dated December 9, 1999, between the registrant and Mark G. Merrill. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit number 10.8 to the registration statement on Form S-1 of the Registrant, file no. 333-104419.
  10 .9   Employment Agreement, dated November 4, 2002, between the registrant and Michael F. Falcon. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit number 10.10 to the registration statement on Form S-1 of the Registrant, file no. 333-104419.
  10 .10   Employment Agreement, dated January 6, 2003, between the registrant and Charles T. Olson. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit number 10.11 to the registration statement on Form S-1 of the Registrant, file no. 333-104419.
  10 .11   Loan and Security Agreement, dated July 25, 2002, between the registrant and Comerica Bank-California. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit number 10.13 to the registration statement on Form S-1 of the Registrant, file no. 333-104419.
  10 .12   Standard Office Lease, dated December 3, 2001, between the registrant and Dell Associates II-A, and First Amendment to Standard Office Lease, dated March 21, 2002. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit number 10.14 to the registration statement on Form S-1 of the Registrant, file no. 333-104419.
  10 .13**   Distributor Agreement, dated March 1, 1997, between the registrant and Tech Data Product Management, Inc. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit number 10.15 to the registration statement on Form S-1 of the Registrant, file no. 333-104419.
  10 .14**   Distributor Agreement, dated March 1, 1996, between the registrant and Ingram Micro Inc., as amended by Amendment dated October 1, 1996 and Amendment No. 2 dated July 15, 1998. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit number 10.16 to the registration statement on Form S-1 of the Registrant, file no. 333-104419.
  10 .15**   Non-exclusive Distributor Agreement, dated September 25, 1995, between registrant and Computer 2000 AG, as amended by Amendment dated September 30, 1996. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit number 10.17 to the registration statement on Form S-1 of the Registrant, file no. 333-104419.
  10 .16**   Master Purchase Agreement, dated February 11, 2003, between the registrant and Lite-On Technology Corporation. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit number 10.18 to the registration statement on Form S-1 of the Registrant, file no. 333-104419.
  10 .17**   Master Purchase Agreement, dated March 31, 2003, between the registrant and Delta Networks, Inc., as signed by the registrant on April 24, 2003. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit number 10.19 to the registration statement on Form S-1 of the Registrant, file no. 333-104419.

II-4



Table of Contents

         
Exhibit
Number Exhibit Title


  10 .18**   Vendor Agreement, dated September 24, 2001, between the registrant and Best Buy Co., Inc. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit number 10.20 to the registration statement on Form S-1 of the Registrant, file no. 333-104419.
  10 .19**   Product Service Addendum to the Vendor Agreement, dated September 21, 2001, between the registrant and Best Buy Co., Inc., and Addendum Consignment Agreement to the Vendor Agreement, dated January 1, 2002. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit number 10.21 to the registration statement on Form S-1 of the Registrant, file no. 333-104419.
  10 .20**   Master Purchase Agreement, dated April 25, 2003, between the registrant and SerComm Corporation, as signed by the registrant on May 8, 2003. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit number 10.22 to the registration statement on Form S-1 of the Registrant, file no. 333-104419.
  10 .21**   Vendor Agreement, dated March 26, 1998, between the registrant and Fry’s Electronics, Inc. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit number 10.23 to the registration statement on Form S-1 of the Registrant, file no. 333-104419.
  10 .22**   Retail Outlet Retailer Agreement, dated April 1, 1998, between the registrant and Circuit City Stores, Inc. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit number 10.24 to the registration statement on Form S-1 of the Registrant, file no. 333-104419.
  10 .23**   Warehousing Agreement, dated July 5, 2001, between the registrant and APL Logistics Americas, Ltd. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit number 10.25 to the registration statement on Form S-1 of the Registrant, file no. 333-104419.
  10 .24**   Distribution Operation Agreement, dated April 27, 2001, between the registrant and Furness Logistics BV. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit number 10.26 to the registration statement on Form S-1 of the Registrant, file no. 333-104419.
  10 .25**   Distribution Operation Agreement, dated December 1, 2001, between the registrant and Kerry Logistics (Hong Kong) Limited. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit number 10.27 to the registration statement on Form S-1 of the Registrant, file no. 333-104419.
  10 .26   Services Agreement, dated March 11, 2000, between the registrant and TRINET Employer Group, Inc. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit number 10.28 to the registration statement on Form S-1 of the Registrant, file no. 333-104419.
  10 .27**   Wholesale Vendor Agreement, dated August 28, 2002, between the registrant and Costco Wholesale Corporation and The Price Company. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit number 10.29 to the registration statement on Form S-1 of the Registrant, file no. 333-104419.
  10 .28**   Master Purchase Agreement, dated March 27, 2003, between the registrant and Cameo Communications Corporation. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit number 10.30 to the registration statement on Form S-1 of the Registrant, file no. 333-104419.
  10 .29**   Master Purchase Agreement, dated April 18, 2003, between the registrant and Z-Com, Inc., as signed by the registrant on April 23, 2003. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit number 10.31 to the registration statement on Form S-1 of the Registrant, file no. 333-104419.
  10 .30   Employment Agreement, dated November 3, 2003, between the registrant and Michael Werdann. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit number 10.12 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the registrant for the year ended December 31, 2003, filed on March 5, 2004.
  10 .31   Employment Agreement, dated November 14, 2003, between the registrant and Christopher Marshall. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit number 10.32 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the registrant for the year ended December 31, 2003, filed on March 5, 2004.
  10 .32   Severance Agreement and Release, dated December 14, 2003, between the registrant and Leslie Adams. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit number 10.32 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the registrant for the year ended December 31, 2003, filed on March 5, 2004.

II-5



Table of Contents

         
Exhibit
Number Exhibit Title


  16 .1   Letter from Deloitte & Touche LLP, Independent Auditors, regarding change in accountants. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit number 16.1 to the registration statement on Form S-1 of the Registrant, file no. 333-104419.
  21 .1   List of subsidiaries. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit number 21.1 to the registration statement on Form S-1 of the Registrant, file no. 333-104419.
  23 .1   Consent of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, Independent Accountants.
  23 .2*   Report of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, Independent Auditors, on Financial Statement Schedule.
  23 .3*   Consent of Counsel (included in Exhibit 5.1).
  24 .1*   Power of Attorney (see page II-6 of the Registration Statement).
  99 .1*   Schedule II — Valuation and Qualifying Accounts.

Previously filed.

**  Confidential treatment has been granted as to certain portions of this Exhibit.

Item 17.     Undertakings.

      The undersigned registrant hereby undertakes to provide to the underwriters at the closing specified in the underwriting agreement certificates in such denominations and registered in such names as required by the underwriters to permit prompt delivery to each purchaser.

      Insofar as indemnification by the registrant for liabilities arising under the Securities Act may be permitted to directors, officers and controlling persons of the registrant pursuant to the provisions described in Item 14 above or otherwise, the registrant has been advised that in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange Commission such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act, and is, therefore, unenforceable. In the event that a claim for indemnification against such liabilities (other than the payment by the registrant of expenses incurred or paid by a director, officer, or controlling person of the registrant in the successful defense of any action, suit or proceeding) is asserted by such director, officer or controlling person in connection with the securities being registered, the registrant will, unless in the opinion of its counsel the matter has been settled by controlling precedent, submit to a court of appropriate jurisdiction the question whether such indemnification by it is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act and will be governed by the final adjudication of such issue.

      The undersigned registrant hereby undertakes that:

      For purposes of determining any liability under the Securities Act, the information omitted from the form of prospectus filed as part of this registration statement in reliance upon Rule 430A and contained in a form of prospectus filed by the registrant pursuant to Rule 424(b)(1) or (4) or 497(h) under the Securities Act shall be deemed to be part of this registration statement as of the time it was declared effective.

      For the purpose of determining any liability under the Securities Act, each post-effective amendment that contains a form of prospectus shall be deemed to be a new registration statement relating to the securities offered therein, and the offering of such securities at the time shall be deemed to be the initial bona fide offering thereof.

II-6



Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

      Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act, the Registrant has duly caused this amendment to the registration statement to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in the City of Santa Clara, State of California, on the 12th day of March 2004.

  NETGEAR, INC.
  Registrant
 
  /s/ PATRICK C.S. LO
 
  Patrick C.S. Lo
  (Principal Executive Officer)

POWER OF ATTORNEY

      Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act, this amendment to the registration statement has been signed by the following persons in the capacities and on the dates indicated:

             
Signature Title Date



 
/s/ PATRICK C.S. LO

Patrick C.S. Lo
  Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
  March 12, 2004
 
*

Jonathan Mather
  Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and
Accounting Officer)
  March 12, 2004
 
*

Ralph Faison
  Director   March 12, 2004
 
*

A. Timothy Godwin
  Director   March 12, 2004
 
*

Linwood A. Lacy, Jr.
  Director   March 12, 2004
 
*

Gerald A. Poch
  Director   March 12, 2004
 
*

Gregory J. Rossmann
  Director   March 12, 2004
 
*

Stephen D. Royer
  Director   March 12, 2004
 
*By:   /s/ PATRICK C.S. LO

Patrick C.S. Lo
Attorney-in-Fact
       

II-7



Table of Contents

EXHIBIT INDEX

         
Exhibit
Number Exhibit Title


  1 .1*   Form of Underwriting Agreement.
  3 .1   Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of registrant. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.3 of the registration statement on Form S-1 of the Registrant, file no. 333-104419.
  3 .2   Bylaws of the registrant. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit number 3.5 to the registration statement on Form S-1 of the Registrant, file no. 333-104419.
  4 .1   Form of registrant’s common stock certificate. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit number 4.1 to the registration statement on Form S-1 of the Registrant, file no. 333-104419.
  4 .2   Amended and Restated Investor Rights Agreement, dated February 7, 2002, by and between the registrant and the individuals and entities listed therein. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit number 4.2 to the registration statement on Form S-1 of the Registrant, file no. 333-104419.
  5 .1*   Opinion of Wilson, Sonsini, Goodrich & Rosati, P.C.
  10 .1   Form of Indemnification Agreement for directors and officers. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit number 10.1 to the registration statement on Form S-1 of the Registrant, file no. 333-104419.
  10 .2   2000 Stock Option Plan and forms of agreements thereunder. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit number 10.2 to the registration statement on Form S-1 of the Registrant, file no. 333-104419.
  10 .3   2003 Stock Plan and forms of agreements thereunder. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit number 10.3 to the registration statement on Form S-1 of the Registrant, file no. 333-104419.
  10 .4   2003 Employee Stock Purchase Plan. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit number 10.4 to the registration statement on Form S-1 of the Registrant, file no. 333-104419.
  10 .5   Employment Agreement, dated December 3, 1999, between the registrant and Patrick C.S. Lo. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit number 10.5 to the registration statement on Form S-1 of the Registrant, file no. 333-104419.
  10 .6   Employment Agreement, dated July 15, 2002, between the registrant and Ray Robidoux. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit number 10.6 to the registration statement on Form S-1 of the Registrant, file no. 333-104419.
  10 .7   Employment Agreement, dated August 10, 2001, between the registrant and Jonathan R. Mather. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit number 10.7 to the registration statement on Form S-1 of the Registrant, file no. 333-104419.
  10 .8   Employment Agreement, dated December 9, 1999, between the registrant and Mark G. Merrill. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit number 10.8 to the registration statement on Form S-1 of the Registrant, file no. 333-104419.
  10 .9   Employment Agreement, dated November 4, 2002, between the registrant and Michael F. Falcon. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit number 10.10 to the registration statement on Form S-1 of the Registrant, file no. 333-104419.
  10 .10   Employment Agreement, dated January 6, 2003, between the registrant and Charles T. Olson. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit number 10.11 to the registration statement on Form S-1 of the Registrant, file no. 333-104419.
  10 .11   Loan and Security Agreement, dated July 25, 2002, between the registrant and Comerica Bank-California. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit number 10.13 to the registration statement on Form S-1 of the Registrant, file no. 333-104419.
  10 .12   Standard Office Lease, dated December 3, 2001, between the registrant and Dell Associates II-A, and First Amendment to Standard Office Lease, dated March 21, 2002. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit number 10.14 to the registration statement on Form S-1 of the Registrant, file no. 333-104419.


Table of Contents

         
Exhibit
Number Exhibit Title


  10 .13**   Distributor Agreement, dated March 1, 1997, between the registrant and Tech Data Product Management, Inc. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit number 10.15 to the registration statement on Form S-1 of the Registrant, file no. 333-104419.
  10 .14**   Distributor Agreement, dated March 1, 1996, between the registrant and Ingram Micro Inc., as amended by Amendment dated October 1, 1996 and Amendment No. 2 dated July 15, 1998. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit number 10.16 to the registration statement on Form S-1 of the Registrant, file no. 333-104419.
  10 .15**   Non-exclusive Distributor Agreement, dated September 25, 1995, between registrant and Computer 2000 AG, as amended by Amendment dated September 30, 1996. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit number 10.17 to the registration statement on Form S-1 of the Registrant, file no. 333-104419.
  10 .16**   Master Purchase Agreement, dated February 11, 2003, between the registrant and Lite-On Technology Corporation. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit number 10.18 to the registration statement on Form S-1 of the Registrant, file no. 333-104419.
  10 .17**   Master Purchase Agreement, dated March 31, 2003, between the registrant and Delta Networks, Inc., as signed by the registrant on April 24, 2003. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit number 10.19 to the registration statement on Form S-1 of the Registrant, file no. 333-104419.
  10 .18**   Vendor Agreement, dated September 24, 2001, between the registrant and Best Buy Co., Inc. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit number 10.20 to the registration statement on Form S-1 of the Registrant, file no. 333-104419.
  10 .19**   Product Service Addendum to the Vendor Agreement, dated September 21, 2001, between the registrant and Best Buy Co., Inc., and Addendum Consignment Agreement to the Vendor Agreement, dated January 1, 2002. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit number 10.21 to the registration statement on Form S-1 of the Registrant, file no. 333-104419.
  10 .20**   Master Purchase Agreement, dated April 25, 2003, between the registrant and SerComm Corporation, as signed by the registrant on May 8, 2003. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit number 10.22 to the registration statement on Form S-1 of the Registrant, file no. 333-104419.
  10 .21**   Vendor Agreement, dated March 26, 1998, between the registrant and Fry’s Electronics, Inc. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit number 10.23 to the registration statement on Form S-1 of the Registrant, file no. 333-104419.
  10 .22**   Retail Outlet Retailer Agreement, dated April 1, 1998, between the registrant and Circuit City Stores, Inc. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit number 10.24 to the registration statement on Form S-1 of the Registrant, file no. 333-104419.
  10 .23**   Warehousing Agreement, dated July 5, 2001, between the registrant and APL Logistics Americas, Ltd. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit number 10.25 to the registration statement on Form S-1 of the Registrant, file no. 333-104419.
  10 .24**   Distribution Operation Agreement, dated April 27, 2001, between the registrant and Furness Logistics BV. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit number 10.26 to the registration statement on Form S-1 of the Registrant, file no. 333-104419.
  10 .25**   Distribution Operation Agreement, dated December 1, 2001, between the registrant and Kerry Logistics (Hong Kong) Limited. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit number 10.27 to the registration statement on Form S-1 of the Registrant, file no. 333-104419.
  10 .26   Services Agreement, dated March 11, 2000, between the registrant and TRINET Employer Group, Inc. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit number 10.28 to the registration statement on Form S-1 of the Registrant, file no. 333-104419.


Table of Contents

         
Exhibit
Number Exhibit Title


  10 .27**   Wholesale Vendor Agreement, dated August 28, 2002, between the registrant and Costco Wholesale Corporation and The Price Company. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit number 10.29 to the registration statement on Form S-1 of the Registrant, file no. 333-104419.
  10 .28**   Master Purchase Agreement, dated March 27, 2003, between the registrant and Cameo Communications Corporation. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit number 10.30 to the registration statement on Form S-1 of the Registrant, file no. 333-104419.
  10 .29**   Master Purchase Agreement, dated April 18, 2003, between the registrant and Z-Com, Inc., as signed by the registrant on April 23, 2003. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit number 10.31 to the registration statement on Form S-1 of the Registrant, file no. 333-104419.
  10 .30   Employment Agreement, dated November 3, 2003, between the registrant and Michael Werdann. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit number 10.12 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the registrant for the year ended December 31, 2003, filed on March 5, 2004.
  10 .31   Employment Agreement, dated November 14, 2003, between the registrant and Christopher Marshall. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit number 10.32 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the registrant for the year ended December 31, 2003, filed on March 5, 2004.
  10 .32   Severance Agreement and Release, dated December 14, 2003, between the registrant and Leslie Adams. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit number 10.32 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the registrant for the year ended December 31, 2003, filed on March 5, 2004.
  16 .1   Letter from Deloitte & Touche LLP, Independent Auditors, regarding change in accountants. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit number 16.1 to the registration statement on Form S-1 of the Registrant, file no. 333-104419.
  21 .1   List of subsidiaries. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit number 21.1 to the registration statement on Form S-1 of the Registrant, filed no. 333-104419.
  23 .1   Consent of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, Independent Accountants.
  23 .2*   Report of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, Independent Auditors, on Financial Statement Schedule.
  23 .3*   Consent of Counsel (included in Exhibit 5.1).
  24 .1*   Power of Attorney (see page II-6 of the Registration Statement).
  99 .1*   Schedule II — Valuation and Qualifying Accounts.


Previously filed.

**  Confidential treatment has been granted as to certain portions of this Exhibit.

Dates Referenced Herein   and   Documents Incorporated by Reference

This ‘S-1/A’ Filing    Date    Other Filings
2/7/09
3/13/07
8/5/06
4/22/06
2/7/054
Filed as of:3/15/04
Filed on:3/12/04
3/5/0410-K,  S-1
3/1/044
2/23/04
2/20/044
1/31/043/A,  4
12/31/0310-K
12/21/03
12/15/03
12/14/03
11/14/03
11/3/034
9/28/0310-Q
7/31/033,  424B4
7/30/033,  3/A,  4,  S-1/A
7/25/038-A12G
7/11/03
6/29/0310-Q
6/15/03
5/19/03
5/8/03
4/25/03
4/24/03
4/23/03
4/18/03
3/31/03
3/30/03
3/27/03
2/11/03
2/3/03
1/31/03
1/6/03
12/31/02
12/16/02
12/6/02
11/4/02
10/31/02
10/30/02
9/30/02
9/29/02
9/11/02
8/31/02
8/28/02
7/31/02
7/25/02
7/15/02
6/30/02
5/31/02
4/30/02
4/22/02
3/31/02
3/21/02
3/15/02
3/13/02
2/8/02
2/7/02
1/1/02
12/31/01
12/3/01
12/1/01
9/24/01
9/21/01
9/11/01
8/10/01
7/5/01
4/27/01
4/26/01
3/31/01
3/20/01
3/1/01
1/1/01
12/31/00
9/6/00
3/11/00
1/1/00
12/31/99
12/9/99
12/3/99
7/15/98
4/1/98
3/26/98
3/1/97
10/1/96
9/30/96
6/30/96
3/1/96
1/8/96
9/25/95
 List all Filings 
Top
Filing Submission 0000891618-04-000711   –   Alternative Formats (Word / Rich Text, HTML, Plain Text, et al.)

Copyright © 2024 Fran Finnegan & Company LLC – All Rights Reserved.
AboutPrivacyRedactionsHelp — Sat., May 11, 12:35:52.2am ET