SEC Info  
    Home      Search      My Interests      Help      Sign In      Please Sign In

Ckrush, Inc. – ‘SB-2/A’ on 10/8/98

As of:  Thursday, 10/8/98   ·   Accession #:  1047469-98-36781   ·   File #:  333-58631

Previous ‘SB-2’:  ‘SB-2’ on 7/7/98   ·   Next:  ‘SB-2/A’ on 2/11/99   ·   Latest:  ‘SB-2/A’ on 11/12/99

Find Words in Filings emoji
 
  in    Show  and   Hints

  As Of                Filer                Filing    For·On·As Docs:Size              Issuer               Agent

10/08/98  Ckrush, Inc.                      SB-2/A                13:603K                                   Merrill Corp/New/FA

Pre-Effective Amendment to Registration of Securities by a Small-Business Issuer   —   Form SB-2
Filing Table of Contents

Document/Exhibit                   Description                      Pages   Size 

 1: SB-2/A      Pre-Effective Amendment to Registration of            84    518K 
                          Securities by a Small-Business Issuer                  
 2: EX-1.1      Exhibit 1.1 Representative's Warrant                  12     47K 
 3: EX-1.2      Exhibit 1.2 Underwriting Agreement                    38    179K 
 4: EX-10.28    Exhibit 10.28 Endorsement Agrmt With Glen Day         12     50K 
 5: EX-10.33    Exhibit 10.33 Form of Incentive Stock Option Agrmt     8     33K 
 6: EX-10.34    Exhibit 10.34 Form of Non-Qual. Stock Option Agrmt     8     32K 
 7: EX-10.37    Exhibit 10.37 Consulting Agreement                     4     22K 
 8: EX-10.38    Exhibit 10.38 Form for Outside Directors               7     31K 
 9: EX-10.39    Exhibit 10.39 Termination Agrmt With Daniel Snider     1      9K 
10: EX-10.40    Exhibit 10.40 Wrnt Agrmt, Co. & Amer Stock Tfr        19     79K 
11: EX-23.1     Exhibit 23.1 Consent of Pricewaterhouse                1      7K 
12: EX-99.1     Exhibit 99.1 - Consent of Daniel Snider                1      7K 
13: EX-99.2     Exhibit 99.2 - Consent of Kim Haskell                  1      8K 


SB-2/A   —   Pre-Effective Amendment to Registration of Securities by a Small-Business Issuer
Document Table of Contents

Page (sequential) | (alphabetic) Top
 
11st Page   -   Filing Submission
"Jim Dodrill
6Prospectus Summary
8Marketing
9The Offering
10Risk Factors
12Lack of Cash
"Precarious Financial Condition
"Ability to Continue as a Going Concern
13History of Losses; Anticipation of Future Losses
"Lack of Experience of Management
14Litigation
"Dependence on Product Introduction
15Intellectual Property
16Risk of Retailers' Refusal to Place or Maintain Tegra Retail Environments
"Competition
19Representative's Influence Over Potential Future Capital Financing
24Representative's Warrants
25Use of Proceeds
26Dilution
27Capitalization
"Dividend Policy
28Selected Financial Data
29Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
31Liquidity and Capital Resources
33Business
37Endorsements
39Legal Proceedings
41Management
42New Directors
44Benefit Plans
"Stock Option Plans
45Option Grants in Last Fiscal Year
"MONY Plan
46Principal and Selling Shareholders
"Concurrent Registration
48Certain Transactions
"Recent Loan and Consulting Agreement
50Description of Securities
"Common Stock
"Preferred Stock
51Warrants
"Delaware Law
52Certain Effects of Authorized but Unissued Stock
53Shares Available for Future Sale
54Underwriting
56Legal Matters
"Experts
"Available Information
59Report of Independent Certified Public Accountants
62Statement of Changes in Shareholders' Deficit
66Stock-based compensation
77Item 24:. Indemnification of Directors and Officers
78Item 25. Other Expenses of Issuance and Distribution
"Item 26:. Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities
81Item 27:. Exhibits
83Item 28. Undertakings
SB-2/A1st Page of 84TOCTopPreviousNextBottomJust 1st
 

AS FILED WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION ON OCTOBER 8, 1998 REGISTRATION NO. 333-58631 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549 -------------------------- AMENDMENT NO. 1 FORM SB-2 REGISTRATION STATEMENT UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933 -------------------------- OUTLOOK SPORTS TECHNOLOGY, INC. (Name of Small Business Issuer in its Charter) -------------------------- [Download Table] DELAWARE 3949 65-0648808 (State or other jurisdiction of (Primary Standard (I.R.S. Employer incorporation or organization) Industrial Classification Identification Number) Code Number) -------------------------- 4400 NORTH FEDERAL HIGHWAY, SUITE 410 BOCA RATON, FLORIDA 33431 (561) 750-7528 (Address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of registrant's principal executive offices) -------------------------- JIM DODRILL PRESIDENT 4400 NORTH FEDERAL HIGHWAY, SUITE 410 BOCA RATON, FLORIDA 33431 (561) 750-7528 (Address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of agent for service) -------------------------- COPIES OF ALL COMMUNICATIONS TO: [Download Table] PETER ROSENBLUM, ESQ. ROBERT E. ALTENBACH, ESQ. DAVE BROADWIN, ESQ. Kutak Rock Foley, Hoag & Eliot LLP 225 Peachtree Street, N.E. One Post Office Square Atlanta, Georgia 30303-1731 Boston, Massachusetts 02109 (404) 222-4600 (617) 832-1000 -------------------------- APPROXIMATE DATE OF PROPOSED SALE TO THE PUBLIC: As soon as practicable after this Registration Statement becomes effective. If any of the securities being registered on this Form are to be offered on a delayed or continuous basis pursuant to Rule 415 under the Securities Act of 1933, check the following box: /X/ -------------------------- CALCULATION OF REGISTRATION FEE [Enlarge/Download Table] PROPOSED MAXIMUM AMOUNT OF TITLE OF EACH CLASS OF AMOUNT TO BE PROPOSED MAXIMUM AGGREGATE AMOUNT OF SECURITIES TO BE REGISTERED REGISTERED PRICE PER SHARE OFFERING PRICE (1) REGISTRATION FEE Class A Common Stock, $.01 par value (2)......... 2,875,000 $7.00 $20,125,000 -- Redeemable Class A Common Stock Purchase Warrants (3)............................................ 2,952,500 $0.125 $369,063 -- Class A Common Stock issuable upon exercise of Redeemable Class A Common Stock Purchase Warrants....................................... 2,952,500 $8.05 $23,767,625 -- Representative's Warrant......................... 250,000 $0.01 $2,500 -- Class A Common Stock issuable upon exercise of Representative's Warrant....................... 250,000 $8.40 $2,100,000 -- Total............................................ 9,280,000 $46,364,188 $13,677 (4) (1) Estimated solely for the purpose of calculating the registration fee in accordance with Rule 457(a) under the Securities Act of 1933. (2) Includes 375,000 shares of Class A Common Stock subject to the Underwriters' over-allotment option. (3) Includes 150,000 Warrants subject to the Underwriters' over-allotment option, 50,000 Warrants issuable upon exercise of the Representative's Warrant and 1,752,500 warrants registered in the concurrent registration. (4) Includes a filing fee of $10,546 paid in connection with the initial filing of this Registration Statement on July 7, 1998. THE REGISTRANT HEREBY AMENDS THIS REGISTRATION STATEMENT ON SUCH DATE OR DATES AS MAY BE NECESSARY TO DELAY ITS EFFECTIVE DATE UNTIL THE REGISTRANT SHALL FILE A FURTHER AMENDMENT WHICH SPECIFICALLY STATES THAT THIS REGISTRATION STATEMENT SHALL THEREAFTER BECOME EFFECTIVE IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 8(A) OF THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933, AS AMENDED, OR UNTIL THIS REGISTRATION STATEMENT SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE ON SUCH DATE AS THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, ACTING PURSUANT TO SAID SECTION 8(A), MAY DETERMINE. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SB-2/A2nd Page of 84TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 2nd
INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO COMPLETION OR AMENDMENT. A REGISTRATION STATEMENT RELATING TO THESE SECURITIES HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION. THESE SECURITIES MAY NOT BE SOLD NOR MAY OFFERS TO BUY BE ACCEPTED PRIOR TO THE TIME THE REGISTRATION STATEMENT BECOMES EFFECTIVE. THIS PROSPECTUS SHALL NOT CONSTITUTE AN OFFER TO SELL OR THE SOLICITATION OF AN OFFER TO BUY NOR SHALL THERE BE ANY SALE OF THESE SECURITIES IN ANY STATE IN WHICH SUCH OFFER, SOLICITATION OR SALE WOULD BE UNLAWFUL PRIOR TO REGISTRATION OR QUALIFICATION UNDER THE SECURITIES LAWS OF ANY SUCH STATE.
SB-2/A3rd Page of 84TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 3rd
SUBJECT TO COMPLETION, DATED , 1998 PROSPECTUS OUTLOOK SPORTS TECHNOLOGY, INC. 2,500,000 SHARES OF CLASS A COMMON STOCK AND 1,000,000 REDEEMABLE CLASS A COMMON STOCK PURCHASE WARRANTS Outlook Sports Technology, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), hereby offers 2,500,000 shares of Class A Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share (the "Class A Common Stock"), and 1,000,000 Redeemable Class A Common Stock Purchase Warrants (the "Warrants"). The shares of Class A Common Stock and the Warrants offered hereby (sometimes hereinafter collectively referred to as the "Securities") may be purchased separately. It is currently estimated that the initial offering price per share of the Class A Common Stock will be between $6.00 and $8.00 and that the initial offering price per Warrant will be $.125. Each Warrant is transferable and exercisable immediately upon issuance and entitles the holder thereof to purchase one share of Class A Common Stock at a price per share of 115% of the initial public offering price of the Class A Common Stock, for a period of three years. The Warrants are redeemable by the Company at a redemption price of $.125 per Warrant, at any time, upon 30 days prior written notice to the holders thereof, if the average closing price of the Class A Common Stock equals or exceeds 120% of the initial public offering price per share of Class A Common Stock for 10 consecutive trading days ending on the date prior to the date of the notice of redemption. Concurrently herewith the Company is registering for resale (i) 275,000 shares of Class A Common Stock (the "Selling Stockholder Shares") held by six existing Stockholders (the "Selling Stockholders") and (ii) 1,752,500 Warrants (the "Selling Warrantholder Warrants") held by 44 existing Warrantholders (the "Selling Warrantholders" and collectively with the Selling Stockholders the "Selling Security-holders"). The Selling Warrantholders have agreed, subject to certain conditions, not to sell any Selling Warrantholder Warrants for a period of one year following the effective date of this Offering. Thereafter the Selling Warrantholder Warrants may be sold without any lock-up restrictions. The Selling Stockholders have granted the Underwriters an option, exercisable within 45 days of the date hereof, to purchase up to 275,000 shares of Class A Common Stock solely to cover over-allotments, if any. The Company will not receive any of the proceeds of the sales of the Selling Warrantholder Warrants or the Selling Stockholders Shares. See "Description of Securities." Prior to this offering (the "Offering") there has been no public market for the Class A Common Stock or Warrants and there can be no assurance that any such market will develop. The initial public offering price of the shares of Class A Common Stock, the Warrants and the exercise price and other terms of the Warrants have been determined by negotiations between the Company and Argent Securities, Inc., as representative of the Underwriters (the "Representative"). See Underwriting. The Company has applied to include the Class A Common Stock and the Warrants for listing on the NASDAQ Stock Market's SmallCap Market under the symbols TGRA and TGRAW, respectively. THE SECURITIES OFFERED HEREBY ARE SPECULATIVE AND INVOLVE A HIGH DEGREE OF RISK AND IMMEDIATE SUBSTANTIAL DILUTION FROM THE PUBLIC OFFERING PRICE. PROSPECTIVE INVESTORS SHOULD CAREFULLY CONSIDER THE RISKS DESCRIBED UNDER THE CAPTION "RISK FACTORS" WHICH APPEAR BEGINNING ON PAGE 10 OF THIS PROSPECTUS. THESE SECURITIES HAVE NOT BEEN APPROVED OR DISAPPROVED BY THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ANY STATE SECURITIES COMMISSION NOR HAS THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ANY STATE SECURITIES COMMISSION PASSED UPON THE ACCURACY OR ADEQUACY OF THIS PROSPECTUS. ANY REPRESENTATION TO THE CONTRARY IS A CRIMINAL OFFENSE. [Enlarge/Download Table] UNDERWRITING PROCEEDS TO PRICE TO DISCOUNTS AND PROCEEDS TO SELLING PUBLIC COMMISSIONS (1) COMPANY(2) SECURITY-HOLDERS(3) Per Share of Class A Common Stock... $ $ Per Warrant......................... $ $ Total (3)..................... $ $ (1) Does not reflect additional compensation to be received by Argent Securities, Inc. (the "Representative") in the form of: (i) a non- accountable expense allowance equal to 3% of the gross proceeds of this Offering or $ ($ if the Underwriter's over allotment option described in footnote 3 is exercised in full), and (ii) an option to purchase up to 250,000 shares of Class A Common Stock and 50,000 Warrants at 120% of the initial public offering price (the "Representative's Warrants"), exercisable for a period of four years, commencing one year after the effective date of the Registration Statement of which this Prospectus is a part. The Company and the Underwriters have agreed to indemnify each other against certain liabilities, including liabilities under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. See "Underwriting." (2) Before deducting expenses of the Offering payable by the Company estimated at approximately $ , including the Representative's non-accountable expense allowance (assuming no exercise of the Underwriters' over-allotment option). (3) The Company has granted the Underwriters an option, exercisable within 45 days of the date hereof, to purchase up to an additional 100,000 shares of Class A Common Stock and 150,000 Warrants, solely to cover over-allotments, if any. The Selling Stockholders have granted the Underwriters an option, exercisable within 45 days of the date hereof, to purchase up to 275,000 shares of Class A Common Stock solely to cover over-allotments, if any. The Underwriters have agreed to exercise in full the over-allotment option granted to them by the Company before exercising any of the over-allotment options granted to them by the Selling Stockholders. If the Underwriters' over-allotment option is exercisable in full, the total Price to Public, Underwriting Discount, Proceeds to Company and Proceeds to Selling Stockholders will be $ , $ , $ , and $ , respectively. See "Underwriting." The Securities offered by this Prospectus are being offered by the Underwriters on a "firm commitment" basis subject to prior sale, when, as and if accepted by the Underwriters, approval of certain legal matters by counsel for the Underwriters and certain other conditions. The Underwriters reserve the right to withdraw, cancel or modify such offer without notice and reject any order in whole or part. It is expected that delivery of the certificates representing the Securities will be made in Atlanta, Georgia on or about , 1998. ARGENT SECURITIES, INC. The Date of this Prospectus is , 1998
SB-2/A4th Page of 84TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 4th
"OUTSIDE" OF GATE FOLD On this page appears a photograph of the Tegra driver featuring its Invisible Inset Hosel. INSIDE OF GATE FOLD LEFT On this page appear several photographs including one of the Company's Tegra Retail Environment displaying the Company's golf equipment, apparel and accessories, one of Ian Woosnam with Tegra golf clubs and golf bag and one of Glen Day using the Tegra driver. INSIDE GATE FOLD RIGHT On this page appear two photographs including one of the Tegra iron featuring its Invisible Inset Hosel and one showing four golfers using and/or wearing Tegra products. INSIDE BACK COVER Red background with Tegra logo. IN CONNECTION WITH THIS OFFERING, THE UNDERWRITERS MAY OVER ALLOT OR EFFECT TRANSACTIONS WHICH STABILIZE OR MAINTAIN THE MARKET PRICE OF THE COMMON STOCK OR WARRANTS OF THE COMPANY AT A LEVEL ABOVE THAT WHICH MIGHT OTHERWISE PREVAIL IN THE OPEN MARKET. SUCH STABILIZING, IF COMMENCED, MAY BE DISCONTINUED AT ANY TIME. The Company intends to furnish to its security holders annual reports containing audited financial statements and such other periodic reports as the Company may determine to be appropriate or as may be required by law.
SB-2/A5th Page of 84TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 5th
NOTICE TO CALIFORNIA INVESTORS Each purchaser of Securities in California must meet one of the following suitability standards: (i) a liquid net worth (excluding home, furnishings and automobiles) of $250,000 or more and gross annual income during 1997, and estimated during 1998, of $65,000 or more from all sources; or (ii) a liquid net worth (excluding home, furnishings and automobiles) of $500,000 or more. Each California resident purchasing Securities offered hereby will be required to execute a representation that it comes within one of the aforementioned categories. The Company uses and has applied to register in the United States the following marks: TEGRA-TM-, TEGRA T (and design)-TM-, T (and design)-TM-, GOLF FIRST-TM-, INVISIBLE INSET HOSEL-TM-, and NEMESIS-TM-. Other trademarks referred to in this Prospectus are not owned by the Company and the Company makes no claim of association with respect to those marks or their owners. 3
SB-2/A6th Page of 84TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 6th
PROSPECTUS SUMMARY THE FOLLOWING SUMMARY IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY AND SHOULD BE READ IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE MORE DETAILED INFORMATION, AND THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND NOTES THERETO, APPEARING ELSEWHERE IN THIS PROSPECTUS. UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED, THE INFORMATION IN THIS PROSPECTUS HAS BEEN ADJUSTED TO GIVE RETROACTIVE EFFECT TO A NUMBER OF STOCK SPLITS AND REVERSE STOCK SPLITS AS DESCRIBED IN NOTE 6 TO THE COMPANY'S FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDED ELSEWHERE HEREIN AND ASSUMES (I) THAT THE UNDERWRITERS' OVER-ALLOTMENT OPTION HAS NOT BEEN EXERCISED, AND (II) THAT THE REPRESENTATIVE'S WARRANTS HAVE NOT BEEN EXERCISED. EACH PROSPECTIVE INVESTOR IS URGED TO READ THIS PROSPECTUS IN ITS ENTIRETY. ON OCTOBER 7, 1998, THE COMPANY AMENDED ITS CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION TO CREATE TWO CLASSES OF COMMON STOCK (15,000,000 SHARES OF CLASS A COMMON STOCK AND 5,000,000 SHARES OF CLASS B COMMON STOCK) (THE "AMENDMENT"). ALL SHARES OF THE COMPANY'S COMMON EQUITY OUTSTANDING PRIOR TO THE AMENDMENT WERE CONVERTED INTO SHARES OF CLASS A COMMON STOCK EXCEPT FOR 1,464,953 SHARES OF COMMON EQUITY OWNED BY MESSRS. BERGER AND DODRILL WHICH WERE CONVERTED INTO AN EQUAL NUMBER OF SHARES OF CLASS B COMMON STOCK. THE CLASS A AND CLASS B COMMON STOCK HAVE IDENTICAL RIGHTS, INCLUDING VOTING RIGHTS. EACH SHARE OF CLASS B COMMON STOCK WILL BE AUTOMATICALLY CONVERTED INTO A SHARE OF CLASS A COMMON STOCK ON THE EARLIER TO OCCUR OF (I) OCTOBER 31, 2000 OR (II) SUCH TIME AS THE CLOSING PRICE OF THE CLASS A COMMON STOCK SHALL EQUAL OR EXCEED $8.00 FOR 10 CONSECUTIVE TRADING DAYS. REFERENCES IN THIS PROSPECTUS TO "COMMON STOCK" ARE TO THE CLASS A COMMON STOCK AND THE CLASS B COMMON STOCK COLLECTIVELY. SEE "DESCRIPTION OF SECURITIES -- COMMON STOCK." THE DISCUSSION IN THIS PROSPECTUS CONTAINS FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS WITHIN THE MEANING OF SECTION 27A OF THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933, AS AMENDED (THE "SECURITIES ACT"), AND SECTION 21E OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED (THE "EXCHANGE ACT"), THAT INVOLVE RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES. THE SAFE HARBOR FROM PRIVATE ACTIONS BASED ON UNTRUE STATEMENTS OR OMISSIONS OF MATERIAL FACT THAT IS PROVIDED BY THESE TWO STATUTORY PROVISIONS DOES NOT APPLY TO STATEMENTS MADE IN CONNECTION WITH AN INITIAL PUBLIC OFFERING. THE COMPANY'S ACTUAL RESULTS AND THE TIMING OF CERTAIN EVENTS MAY DIFFER MATERIALLY FROM THE RESULTS DISCUSSED IN THE FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS. FACTORS THAT COULD CAUSE OR CONTRIBUTE TO SUCH DIFFERENCES INCLUDE, BUT ARE NOT LIMITED TO, THOSE DISCUSSED IN "RISK FACTORS," "MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATION" AND "BUSINESS." THE COMPANY The Company is a designer, marketer and manufacturer of premium quality golf equipment, apparel and accessories under the Tegra brand name. Tegra products represent a wide range of technologically innovative, premium-priced men's golf clubs, apparel and accessories that are sold in off-course golf specialty and on-course pro shops. Tegra golf clubs incorporate the Company's patent-pending Invisible Inset Hosel (the cylindrical chamber in which the shaft is attached to the club head), a feature designed to reduce slice, and increase the accuracy and distance of golf shots, and were introduced into the US market in October 1997. In the spring of 1998, the Company began installing dedicated Tegra Retail Environments ("TREs") in select golf stores across the country and shipping a Tegra men's apparel line. TREs are defined spaces in golf shops which house the Company's equipment, apparel and accessories in an integrated, branded selling environment. The Company has installed 58 TREs in golf stores in 55 cities. The Company is in the process of opening additional TREs and expects to install up to 100 new TREs for the Spring, 1999 selling season. Tegra products are now available in over 170 golf shops nationwide and the Company expects they will be available in 300 golf shops by year end. The Company's business strategy is to establish itself as a leading designer, marketer and manufacturer of premium golf equipment, apparel and accessories by providing a complete range of products at the premium-priced segment of the golf market. The Company is implementing this strategy by: (1) creating products with proprietary, visibly distinct technology and design such as the Company's patent-pending Invisible Inset Hosel to differentiate the Company from its competitors while pricing such products 4
SB-2/A7th Page of 84TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 7th
competitively and (2) raising consumer demand for and awareness of the Company's products through innovative marketing programs such as TREs as well as traditional advertising, endorsements from professional golfers and use of infomercials. The Company was founded as Hippo, Inc. in 1996 and contemporaneously acquired a license from Hippo Holdings, Ltd. to sell value-priced HiPPO-TM- brand golf equipment, apparel and accessories in the United States. The Company's initial strategy was to sell value-priced golf clubs that were presently available under the HiPPO-TM- brand and to simultaneously develop a premium-priced golf club brand because that segment of the golf market comprises approximately 70% of golf equipment sales and offers higher margins to manufacturers. This development effort resulted in the Tegra line of premium-priced golf equipment. The Company has since discontinued the distribution of value-priced golf equipment to pursue opportunities offered by its Tegra products. On May 4, 1998, the Company sold its license to sell HiPPO-TM- products in the U.S. back to Hippo Holdings, Ltd. along with all existing HiPPO-TM- inventory, marketing materials and related liabilities. In return, the Company received a cash payment from Hippo Holdings, Ltd. of approximately $413,000. In addition Hippo Holdings, Ltd. returned to the Company 50,000 shares of the Company's Common Stock and assumed outstanding liabilities and commitments of the Company in excess of $1,000,000. INDUSTRY OVERVIEW. According to the National Golf Foundation ("NGF"), in 1997, wholesale sales of golf equipment in the U.S. were approximately $3.9 billion. In addition, wholesale sales of golf clubs are estimated to have increased at an annual compound growth rate of approximately 10.9% over the 5-year period from 1992 to 1997. The Company believes that a number of trends are likely to further increase the demand for golf products generally. These trends include: (i) the large numbers of golfers entering their 40s and 50s, the age when most golfers begin to play more often and increase their spending on the sport; (ii) growth in the number of golf courses; (iii) increasing interest in golf from women, junior and minority golfers; (iv) the large population who are beginning to enter their 20s, the age when golfers generally take up the sport; and (v) the rapid evolution of golf club designs and materials. PRODUCTS. Tegra golf clubs which incorporate the Company's patent-pending Invisible Inset Hosel are an evolution from current golf club technology. The Company's design moves or insets the shaft as close to the center of the club head as is permitted under USGA rules. As a result, the club head will rotate to the target faster than conventional designs, making it easier to square the club at impact and enabling the golfer to hit longer and straighter shots. The Company believes that the Company's Invisible Inset Hosel technology could be as significant to the golf industry as perimeter weighting, graphite shafts or oversize metal woods. The Company has conducted player testing on its woods and irons and the Company believes such testing shows its Tegra technology promotes straighter and longer golf shots than other leading premium-priced golf clubs. "Iron Byron" testing (robotic testing designed to repeat identical swings so different clubs can be compared under controlled conditions) of Tegra woods has shown that the Tegra driver provides greater carry, roll and overall distance than certain leading premium-priced clubs while simultaneously increasing accuracy. Additional mechanical testing which has been recorded using high speed video shows that the Invisible Inset Hosel design produces a squarer club face at impact than other leading premium-priced clubs. The Company has also developed a line of Tegra men's apparel. The Company's apparel collection emphasizes quality, comfort and style and is intended to enhance a golfer's on-course performance. The Company plans to introduce to the U.S. market its new apparel line and a full range of golf accessories by Spring 1999. The Company has already begun selling headwear featuring ergonomic closures and intends to introduce items such as golf bags, umbrellas and towels. One of the Company's strategies is to deliver products which can achieve superior retail margin in order to incentivize retailers to sell more Tegra product. The Company estimates that retailers on average achieve 20% gross margin on sales from premium golf equipment. By pricing appropriately, the Company 5
SB-2/A8th Page of 84TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 8th
believes it is able to offer retailers products that can achieve superior margin. The Company expects that, on average, Tegra golf clubs will allow retailers to achieve 40% gross margin, while Tegra apparel will allow retailers to achieve in excess of 50% gross margin. MARKETING. By creating TREs, the Company has adapted a marketing model used by marketers of many leading brands of consumer products, who use in-store shops to increase sales and brand awareness. TREs are defined spaces in golf shops, which occupy from 50 to 150 square feet and consist of flooring, fixtures, graphics and point-of-purchase materials. Within a TRE, the Company markets its Tegra golf clubs, apparel and accessories in an integrated, branded environment designed to convey the image of the Company as innovative in golf club technology and distinctive in design. The Company's advertising focuses on the Company's visibly distinct technology and its performance benefits. In addition, the Company is presently developing a long-format (30 minute) infomercial which is anticipated to air in December. This broadcast advertising is expected to be supplemented with a print campaign. Tegra products are currently endorsed by four touring professionals including Ian Woosnam and Glen Day. Mr. Woosnam began endorsing Tegra products on January 1, 1998, although Mr. Woosnam does not yet have an endorsement contract. Mr. Woosnam competes using Tegra golf clubs, carrying a Tegra bag and wearing Tegra headwear and apparel. The Company is currently negotiating with Mr. Woosnam for him to endorse Tegra products through December 31, 2006. Mr. Woosnam has won more than 40 tournaments worldwide, including the 1991 Master's Tournament. Mr. Day is currently endorsing Tegra golf equipment, apparel and accessories under a contract terminating on December 31, 1998. Since beginning his association with Tegra, Mr. Day has had five top three finishes on the United States PGA Tour. The Company's executive offices are located at 4400 North Federal Highway, Suite 410, Boca Raton, Florida 33431. The Company's telephone number is (561) 750-7528. 6
SB-2/A9th Page of 84TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 9th
THE OFFERING [Enlarge/Download Table] Securities Offered (1).......... 2,500,000 shares of Class A Common Stock and 1,000,000 Warrants. See "Description of Securities." Warrants........................ Each Warrant is immediately exercisable and entitles the holder thereof to purchase one share of Class A Common Stock at a price per share of 115% of the initial public offering price for a period of three years. The Warrants are redeemable by the Company at a redemption price of $0.125 per Warrant, at any time, upon 30 days prior written notice to the holders thereof, if the closing price of the Class A Common Stock equals or exceeds 120% of the initial public offering price of the Class A Common Stock, for 10 consecutive trading days ending on the day prior to the date of the Notice of redemption. See "Description of Securities." Securities Outstanding Prior to the Offering (2).............. 1,051,818 shares of Class A Common Stock and 1,464,953 shares of Class B Common Stock. Securities Outstanding Subsequent to the Offering (3)........................... 3,551,818 shares of Class A Common Stock and 1,464,953 shares of Class B Common Stock and 1,000,000 Warrants. Use of Proceeds by the Company.. The net proceeds of this Offering will be used for repayment of indebtedness, the purchase of inventory, the payment of marketing and advertising expenses and working capital and other corporate purposes. See "Use of Proceeds." NASDAQ Symbols.................. Class A Common Stock -- TGRA; Warrants -- TGRAW ------------------------ (1) Assumes the Underwriters' over-allotment option is not exercised. (2) The Class A Common Stock and the Class B Common Stock have identical rights, including voting rights. Each share of Class B Common Stock will automatically convert into one share of Class A Common Stock on the earlier to occur of (i) October 31, 2000 and (ii) such time as the closing price of the Class A Common Stock shall equal or exceed $8.00 for 10 consecutive trading days. Also excludes 1,752,500 Warrants issuable upon the exercise by certain bridge investors of the right to elect payment in Warrants of amounts due them in connection with the Company's bridge financing (the "Bridge Warrants"). (3) Does not include (i) the 1,000,000 shares of Class A Common Stock issuable upon the exercise of the Warrants offered hereby, (ii) the 100,000 shares of Class A Common Stock and 150,000 Warrants issuable by the Company upon the exercise of the Underwriters' over-allotment option, (iii) the 150,000 shares of Class A Common Stock issuable upon exercise of the Warrants included in the Underwriters' over-allotment option, (iv) the 250,000 shares of Class A Common Stock and 50,000 Warrants issuable upon exercise of the Representative's Warrants (or the 50,000 shares of Class A Common Stock issuable upon exercise of the Warrants included therein), (v) 2,036,170 shares of Class A Common Stock issuable upon the exercise of stock options and warrants outstanding on the date hereof or (vi) up to 1,752,500 Bridge Warrants or 1,752,500 shares of Class A Common Stock issuable upon exercise of such Bridge Warrants. See "Management -- Stock Option Plans," "Description of Securities" and "Underwriting." 7
SB-2/A10th Page of 84TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 10th
RISK FACTORS The Company does not presently have adequate cash from operations or financing activities to meet either its short-term or long-term needs. In addition, the Company's obligation to repay $1,975,000 of bridge debt matured on September 30, 1998 and an additional $3,505,000 of bridge debt will become due on October 15, 1998. The Company does not have sufficient cash to repay these obligations and is currently negotiating with the holders of this debt to extend the maturity date. The Company expects to repay this debt from the proceeds of this offering. See "Use of Proceeds." If this offering is not successful, the Company expects that it will seek alternative private financing or seek to sell the Company if an interested buyer can be found. If no alternative private financing can be secured and no buyer can be found, the Company expects that it will seek protection from its creditors under the applicable bankruptcy laws. See "Risk Factors -- Lack of Cash." There can be no assurance that the Company will be able to achieve its business goals or ever achieve profitability. See "Risk Factors -- Precarious Financial Condition", "-- Ability to Continue as a Going Concern," and "-- History of Losses; Anticipation of Future Losses." The Company is substantially dependent on the efforts of its founders and principal officers who have no proven record of success in designing, marketing or manufacturing retail products. See "Risk Factors -- Lack of Experience of Management." RECENT TRANSACTIONS Since, July, 1988, the Company has consumed all cash on hand and has funded its operations with cash flow and loans from its officers aggregating $67,500 which are to be repaid with the proceeds of this offering. The Company is in the process of negotiating to obtain a loan of $250,000 from an individual. This may be personally guaranteed by Jim Dodrill and Paul Berger. The lender may also provide consulting services to the Company the terms of which are currently being negotiated. See "Use of Proceeds" and "Certain Transactions -- Recent Loan and Consulting Agreement." 8
SB-2/A11th Page of 84TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 11th
SUMMARY FINANCIAL DATA The following summary financial data, insofar as it relates to the period February 8, 1996 (inception) to January 31, 1997 and the year ended January 31, 1998, has been derived from the Company's audited financial statements, including the balance sheets at January 31, 1997 and 1998 and the related statements of operations, of changes in shareholders' deficit and of cash flows for the periods then ended, and notes thereto appearing elsewhere herein. The data for the six months ended July 31, 1997 and 1998 has been derived from unaudited financial statements also appearing herein and which, in the opinion of management, include all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair statement of the results for the unaudited interim periods. The summary financial data should be read in conjunction with the "Selected Financial Data," "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" and the Company's financial statements and notes thereto appearing elsewhere herein. [Enlarge/Download Table] FOR THE PERIOD FEBRUARY 8, 1996 FOR THE FOR THE SIX MONTHS (INCEPTION) TO YEAR ENDED ENDED JULY 31, JANUARY 31, JANUARY 31, ---------------------------- 1997 1998 1997 1998 --------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS DATA: Revenue............................................ $ -- $ 741,120 $ 267,547 $ 440,474 Total costs and expenses........................... $ 2,375,708 $ 5,190,123 $ 1,913,404 $ 3,378,022 Loss from operations............................... $ (2,375,708) $ (4,449,003) $ (1,645,857) $ (2,937,549) Interest expense................................... $ (2,844) $ (244,648) $ (76,555) $ (325,636) Gain on sale of license............................ $ -- $ -- $ -- $ 413,997 Net loss........................................... $ (2,378,552) $ (4,693,651) $ (1,722,412) $ (2,849,188) Basic and diluted net loss per share (1)........... $ (3.24) $ (2.21) $ (1.48) $ (1.17) Weighted average number of shares outstanding...... 734,330 2,120,460 1,162,539 2,425,197 [Enlarge/Download Table] JULY 31, 1998 ----------------------------- AS ADJUSTED ACTUAL (2) ------------- -------------- BALANCE SHEET DATA: Current assets...................................... $ 26,850 $ 650,792 $ 1,135,979 $ 10,435,979 Working (deficit) capital........................... $ (1,306,705) $ (5,056,682) $ (7,679,293) $ 7,683,207 Total assets........................................ $ 227,347 $ 1,005,055 $ 1,658,578 $ 10,958,578 Total liabilities................................... $ 1,373,555 $ 5,747,474 $ 8,855,272 $ 2,792,772 Total shareholders' (deficit) equity................ $ (1,146,208) $ (4,742,419) $ (7,196,694) $ 8,165,806 ------------------------ (1) Due to the Company's losses from continuing operations, the Company's diluted loss per share is the same as that of basic loss per share. (2) Adjusted to give effect to the sale of 2,500,000 shares of Class A Common Stock and 1,000,000 Warrants offered hereby at assumed initial public offering prices of $7.00 per Share and $0.125 per Warrant, respectively, and the application of the net proceeds therefrom. See "Use of Proceeds." No effect has been given to the exercise of (i) the Warrants, (ii) the Underwriter's over-allotment option (iii) the Representative's Warrants (or the Warrants included therein) or (iv) the Bridge Warrants. See "Underwriting." 9
SB-2/A12th Page of 84TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 12th
RISK FACTORS THE SECURITIES OFFERED HEREBY ARE SPECULATIVE AND INVOLVE A HIGH DEGREE OF RISK AND SUBSTANTIAL DILUTION, AND SHOULD NOT BE PURCHASED BY PERSONS WHO CANNOT AFFORD THE LOSS OF THEIR ENTIRE INVESTMENT. PROSPECTIVE INVESTORS SHOULD CONSIDER CAREFULLY THE FOLLOWING FACTORS AS WELL AS OTHER INFORMATION IN THIS PROSPECTUS, INCLUDING THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS HEREIN, PRIOR TO PURCHASING THE SECURITIES. LACK OF CASH The Company does not presently have adequate cash from operations or financing activities to meet either its short-term or long-term needs. In addition, the Company's obligation to repay $1,975,000 of bridge debt matured on September 30, 1998 and an additional $3,505,000 of bridge debt will become due on October 15, 1998. The Company does not have sufficient cash to repay these obligations and is currently negotiating with the holders of this debt to extend the maturity date. The Company expects to repay this debt from the proceeds of this offering. See "Use of Proceeds." If this offering is not successful, the Company expects that it will seek alternative private financing or seek to sell the Company if an interested buyer can be found. If no alternative private financing can be secured and no buyer can be found, the Company expects that it will seek protection from its creditors under the applicable bankruptcy laws. PRECARIOUS FINANCIAL CONDITION For the year ended January 31, 1998, the Company incurred net losses of $4,693,651, and for the six months ended July 31, 1998, the Company incurred net losses of $2,849,188. As of July 31, 1998, the Company had $1,621 in cash and an accumulated deficit of $9,921,391. The Company's current liabilities, as of such date, aggregated $8,815,272 and exceeded the Company's current assets by $7,679,293. The Company expects its cash needs subsequent to repayment of bridge loan debt for the next twelve months to be approximately $4,400,000. The Company does not presently have adequate cash from operations to meet these needs. In order to meet its needs for cash to fund its operations, the Company must obtain additional financing. The Company is currently in default under a number of its arrangements, agreements and instruments with creditors. If this Offering is not successful or if the Company is unable to obtain significant additional financing, it may be obligated to seek protection from its creditors under the bankruptcy laws and the existing stockholders may lose their investment. See "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations -- Liquidity and Capital Resources"; and the financial statements and notes thereto included elsewhere in this Prospectus. ABILITY TO CONTINUE AS A GOING CONCERN The Company's independent certified public accountants have issued their report dated June 9, 1998 on the financial statements of the Company as of January 31, 1998 and for the year then ended, which includes an explanatory paragraph expressing substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern. Among the reasons cited by the independent certified public accountants as raising substantial doubt as to the Company's ability to continue as a going concern are the following: the Company has suffered recurring losses and negative cash flows from operations through January 31, 1998, has a shareholders' deficit and working capital deficiency as of January 31, 1998, and is dependent on raising additional financing in order to fund its existing level of operations. These factors raise substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern. If this Offering is not successful or if the Company is unable to secure significant additional financing, it may be obliged to seek protection under the bankruptcy laws and the stockholders may lose their investment. See "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations -- Liquidity and Capital Resources"; and the financial statements and notes thereto included elsewhere in this Prospectus. 10
SB-2/A13th Page of 84TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 13th
HISTORY OF LOSSES; ANTICIPATION OF FUTURE LOSSES The Company has incurred operating losses since its inception and had an accumulated deficit of $9,921,391 as of July 31, 1998. The Company incurred a net loss of $4,693,651 for the twelve months ended January 31, 1998, as compared with a net loss of $2,378,552 for the period ended January 31, 1997. The Company incurred a net loss of $2,849,188 for the six months ended July 31, 1998, as compared with a net loss of $1,722,412 for the six months ended July 31, 1997. Such losses have resulted principally from expenses incurred from general and administrative costs, research and development and marketing costs incurred during the Company's development efforts. The continued development of the Company's business will require the commitment of substantial resources to establish sales and marketing capabilities. The amount of net losses and the time required by the Company to reach sustained profitability are highly uncertain, and to achieve profitability the Company must, among other things, successfully establish sales and marketing capabilities by itself or with third parties. There is no assurance that the Company will ever generate substantial revenues from its products or achieve profitability. See "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations -- Liquidity and Capital Resources." LACK OF EXPERIENCE OF MANAGEMENT The Company is substantially dependent on the efforts of its founders and principal officers. The Company was founded in 1996 and only entered the market for premium-priced golf products in the Fall of 1997. Management has no proven record of success in designing, marketing or manufacturing retail products. In addition, the Company has only recently hired the majority of its sales force. No assurance can be given that the Company will be successful in retaining such personnel and recruiting additional personnel. The golf market is a highly competitive market for personnel and new personnel could be costly in terms of cash compensation or equity necessary to attract them to the Company or may not be available to the Company on any terms. The Company currently has no employment contracts or non-competition agreements with, nor does it carry key man life insurance for, any of its founders or principal officers. DEPENDENCE ON OFFERING PROCEEDS The Company's capital requirements have been and will continue to be significant. The Company is dependent on and intends to use a substantial portion of the proceeds of this Offering to fund purchases of inventory and implement its marketing strategies. The Company also plans to use approximately $6,062,500 of the proceeds of this Offering to repay indebtedness. See "Use of Proceeds." The Company anticipates, based on currently proposed plans and assumptions relating to its operations, that the proceeds of this Offering, together with cash flow from operations, will be sufficient to satisfy its contemplated cash requirements for the next 18 months. In the event that the Company's plans change, its assumptions change or prove to be inaccurate or if the proceeds of this Offering or cash flows otherwise prove to be insufficient to fund operations (due to unanticipated expenses, delays, problems, difficulties or otherwise), the Company will be required to minimize cash expenditures and/or obtain additional financing in order to support its plan of operations. The Company has no current arrangements with respect to, or sources of, additional financing and there can be no assurance that any additional financing will be available to the Company on acceptable terms, or at all. See "Use of Proceeds" and "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations -- Liquidity and Capital Resources." LIMITED HISTORY The Company has a limited operating and financial history for potential investors to consider in assessing the advisability of an investment in the Company. The Company must, therefore, be considered to be subject to all of the risks inherent in the establishment of a new business enterprise, including the absence of any significant operating history, any significant revenues, losses from continuing operations and the presence of outstanding payables and significant commitments, along with the uncertainties of the 11
SB-2/A14th Page of 84TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 14th
development and marketing of new products. The Company's prospects must be considered in light of the risks, expenses and difficulties frequently encountered by new businesses in a highly competitive industry. To date the Company has achieved limited sales and during the year ended January 31, 1998 the Company incurred losses of $4,693,651 on revenues of $741,120. To address these risks, the Company must, among other things, successfully increase the scope of its operations, respond to competitive and technological developments, continue to attract, retain and motivate qualified personnel and continue to develop and obtain market acceptance of its products. There can be no assurance that the Company will be successful in addressing these risks and challenges. See "-- Lack of Experience of Management." LITIGATION The Company has received a letter from Tatsuya Saito requesting that the Company review its TEGRA line of clubs in view of a patent issued to him on July 12, 1994 (the "Saito Patent"). The Saito Patent covers certain aspects of a club head and hosel, including the positioning of the hosel inset relative to the club head. The Company has referred this request to independent outside patent counsel. The Company does not believe that the TEGRA line of clubs infringes any of the claims of the Saito Patent; however, there can be no assurance that a court will not conclude that one or more of the Company's products does not infringe the Saito Patent, or any other patent. If Mr. Saito is successful in asserting his patent, it could require the Company to alter or withdraw existing products, delay or prevent the introduction of new products, or force the Company to pay damages if the products have been introduced. See "-- Intellectual Property" and "Business -- Legal Proceedings." The Company has received a letter from Vardon Golf Company, Inc. ("Vardon") asserting that the Company's TEGRA woods and irons infringe one of the claims of its patent issued on April 12, 1994 (the "Vardon Patent"). The Vardon Patent includes claims directed to a number of aspects of a golf club head and hosel, including claims directed to an extended radius of gyration, which includes an aspect of the club head extending behind the hosel. Vardon filed a complaint in the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division, on May 13, 1998, in which Vardon alleges that six companies have manufactured, sold, offered to sell and distributed in the United States, specifically in the Northern District of Illinois, wood-type and iron golf club products that are covered by at least one claim of the Vardon Patent and a related design patent. The Company does not believe that the TEGRA line of clubs infringes any of the claims of these patents and the Company is in the process of preparing a response to the complaint; however, there can be no assurance that a court will not conclude that the Company does not infringe one or the other of these patents, or both. If Vardon is successful in asserting its patent, it could require the Company to alter or withdraw existing products, delay or prevent the introduction of new products, or force the Company to pay damages if the products have been introduced. See "-- Intellectual Property" and "Business -- Legal Proceedings." The Company is the defendant in a lawsuit filed by TBWA Chiat/Day Inc. ("Chiat") in the Supreme Court of the State of New York on July 6, 1998 alleging breach of contract for advertising services and that certain fees and expenses in an amount of approximately $200,000 incurred by Chiat have not been paid by the Company. The Company has prepared and filed a response to this complaint, and the Company intends to assert its defenses vigorously; however, there can be no assurance that the Company will prevail. See "Business -- Legal Proceedings." DEPENDENCE ON PRODUCT INTRODUCTION The Company believes that the introduction of new, innovative golf clubs will be crucial to its future success. The Company has just begun to sell products to retailers but there can be no assurance that the Company's newly developed products will be accepted by consumers or preferred by consumers over other companies' products. There can also be no assurance that the Company will successfully develop new products. New models and basic design changes are frequently introduced into the golf club market but often meet with consumer rejection. Failure by the Company to identify and develop products that achieve 12
SB-2/A15th Page of 84TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 15th
widespread market acceptance would adversely affect the Company's future growth and profitability. Additionally, successful technologies, designs and product concepts are likely to be copied by competitors. Accordingly, the Company's operating results could fluctuate as a result of the amount, timing and market acceptance of new product introductions by the Company or its competitors. In addition the Company plans to introduce new apparel and accessories. The Company has only recently begun to sell some of these products to retailers. There can be no assurance that the Company's apparel and accessories will be accepted by consumers. There can also be no assurance that the Company will be able to design or sell new apparel and accessories in the future. Failure of the Company's current and planned apparel and accessories would adversely affect the Company's future growth and profitability. POTENTIAL CHANGES IN USGA REGULATIONS The design of new golf clubs is also greatly influenced by rules and interpretations of the United States Golf Association ("USGA"). Although the golf equipment standards established by the USGA generally apply only to competitive events sanctioned by that organization, it has become critical for designers of new clubs to assure compliance with USGA Rules. The Company has received an authorization letter from the USGA stating that the Tegra irons and titanium metal woods conform with USGA Rules. Although the Company believes that all future clubs designed by the Company will conform with USGA Rules, no assurance can be given that any new products will receive confirmation of such. In the past, the USGA has made changes in the rules and regulations governing golf equipment. No assurance can be given that it will not do so in the future, any such action by the USGA which changes the rules regarding golf equipment could have a material adverse effect on the Company. INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY TRADEMARKS. The Company has applied in the United States for registration of the following marks: TEGRA, TEGRA T (and design), T (and design), GOLF FIRST, INVISIBLE INSET HOSEL, and NEMESIS. The Company has only applied to register the mark TEGRA outside the U.S., and has only sought to register that mark in Canada, the United Kingdom, Japan and Taiwan. The Company has received notices of allowance from the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office ("PTO") for the marks TEGRA, TEGRA T (and design), T (and design), and NEMESIS. While the Company has undertaken U.S. trademark searches through standard trademark search channels for some of the marks for which the Company seeks registration and the search results reveal that these marks appear to be available for use and registration in the U.S. in connection with golf clubs and some golf accessories and golf related apparel, no assurance can be given that such searches uncovered all existing or potentially conflicting marks. Outside the U.S., the Company has not undertaken any trademark searches to determine whether any of these marks is available for use or registration in connection with golf clubs, golf accessories or golf related apparel. No assurances can be given that any or all of the Company's applications for these trademark registrations will be granted. Additionally, no assurances can be given that any issued trademark registrations will give the Company exclusive rights to use the marks with respect to all of the goods or services the Company may propose to sell. The Company does not plan to introduce any product which is covered by any third party U.S. or foreign trademark, registration or trademark rights known to the Company. To date, there have been no interruptions in the Company's business as the result of any claim of infringement. However, no assurance can be given that the Company will not be adversely affected by the assertion of intellectual property rights belonging to others. The effects of such assertions could include requiring the Company to alter or withdraw existing trademarks or products delaying or preventing the introduction of products, or forcing the Company to pay damages if the products have been introduced. PATENTS. The Company has filed an application for a United States patent claiming certain elements of the Company's Tegra line of inset woods and irons, and the Company has filed a Patent Cooperation 13
SB-2/A16th Page of 84TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 16th
Treaty patent application, designating all countries, that is based on such United States patent application. Based on the results of a patent search conducted by outside patent counsel, the Company is of the view that various aspects of the Tegra line of woods and irons may be patentable, but no assurance can be given that any of the foregoing patent applications or any future application for a utility or design patent will be granted by the U.S. PTO or any other PTO or, if a patent issues, as to the scope of any patent that might issue, or that any such patent will prevent misappropriation or duplication of the Company's products or similar products by competitors, or that the Company will have the rights or resources to commercialize products on the basis of any new patents. There can be no assurance that any issued patents will provide the Company with significant competitive advantages, or that challenges will not be instituted against the validity or enforceability of any patents owned by the Company or, if instituted, that such challenges will not be successful. The cost of litigation to uphold the validity of a patent and prevent infringement can be very substantial and could be beyond the Company's financial means, even if the Company could otherwise prevail in such litigation. Furthermore, there can be no assurance that others will not independently develop similar designs or technologies, duplicate the Company's designs and technologies or design around the patented aspects of the Company's technology. There are numerous patents granted with respect to golf technology, and the Company cannot provide any assurances that any particular product of the Company will not infringe any issued patent or any patent that issues in the future from an application that is currently pending with any of the PTOs, or will not infringe any other right of any third party. To date, there have been no interruptions in the Company's business as the result of any claim of patent infringement. However, no assurance can be given that the Company will not be adversely affected by the assertion of intellectual property rights belonging to others. The Company has not obtained an opinion from its patent counsel that the Company's products do not infringe on the rights of others. The effects of assertion of patent rights of third parties could include requiring the Company to alter or withdraw existing products, delaying or preventing the introduction of products, or forcing the Company to pay damages if the products have been introduced. See "-- Litigation" and "Business -- Legal Proceedings." GLOBAL ESTABLISHMENT OF TEGRA-TM- BRAND The Company's business strategy includes the global use of the TEGRA brand name. Successfully implementing this strategy requires that the Company create recognition of the TEGRA brand, which is new to the golf industry and establish trademark rights in the TEGRA and TEGRA T (and design) marks. Implementing this strategy requires the commitment of substantial financial resources. There can be no assurance that the proceeds of this Offering will be sufficient to implement this strategy or that the Company will be able to obtain any additional financing on acceptable terms or at all. RISK OF RETAILERS' REFUSAL TO PLACE OR MAINTAIN TEGRA RETAIL ENVIRONMENTS A significant component of the Company's corporate strategy is the installation of TREs within stores of the Company's targeted Tegra retailers. There can be no assurance, however, that such retailers will be willing to place the TREs in their stores, or that, if such TREs are installed, their performance will meet the Company's expectations. Moreover, there can be no assurance that, if such TREs are installed, the retailers will agree to keep such TREs in place. This risk is particularly high when, as is currently the case, the Company may not have the resources to provide advertising and other marketing support to the retailers in maintaining the TREs. The Company's failure to persuade such retailers to place or keep TREs in their stores, or the failure of such TREs to perform up to their expectations, would have a material adverse effect on the Company's business. COMPETITION The Company will face intense competition for customers because the golf equipment and apparel industry is highly competitive and is characterized by the frequent introduction of new products. The 14
SB-2/A17th Page of 84TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 17th
Company's competitors consist of several well established domestic and foreign companies, the substantial majority of which have significantly greater financial resources than the Company, longer operating histories in the golf industry, well established reputations, and marketing, distribution and service networks, larger product lines than the Company, and greater management and technical resources. Accordingly, many of these competitors will have greater financial resources to devote to areas such as advertising, marketing and club development, and consequently the cost of entry into the golf market is higher than in many markets. A manufacturer's ability to compete is in part dependent upon its ability to satisfy various subjective requirements of golfers, including the golf club's "look" and "feel" and the level of acceptance that the golf club has among professional and other golfers. Additionally, the apparel industry is driven by, among other factors, fashion considerations and no assurance can be given that the Company's designs will be accepted by consumers or preferred by consumers over other companies' products. SOURCES OF SUPPLY As is the case with most golf club manufacturers, the Company will import club heads and other components from companies in Asia, including companies located in mainland China. In the event that the Company should fail to establish adequate sources of supply, lose its sources of supply for these materials and components, or experience delays in receiving delivery from such sources, the Company would sustain shortages of materials and components and incur delays in meeting delivery deadlines. The Company would also experience such difficulties in the event that any supplier was unable or unwilling to meet the Company's requirements. Any of these occurrences could have a material adverse effect on the Company's operating results. Additionally, the Company faces certain risks associated with importing goods from other countries such as the risk of currency fluctuations, government imposed quotas, work stoppages, political instability and the difficulty in enforcing contracts. The Company relies on a limited number of suppliers for a significant portion of the component parts used in the manufacture of its golf clubs. The Company could in the future experience shortages of components or periods of increased price pressures, which could have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, operating results or financial condition. In addition, failure to obtain adequate supplies or fulfill customer orders on a timely basis could have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, operating results or financial condition. SEASONALITY; DISCRETIONARY CONSUMER SPENDING Golf is generally regarded as a warm weather sport and accordingly, sales of golf equipment reflect a seasonality of market demand and have historically been strongest in the first and second quarters of each year with the weakest sales occurring during the fourth quarter. Due to the seasonality of the industry, results from any one or more quarters are not necessarily indicative of annual results or continuing trends. Additionally, quarterly results may vary from year to year due to the timing of new product introductions by both the Company and its competitors, advertising expenditures, promotional periods; competitive pressures resulting in lower than expected average selling prices; and the volume of orders that are received and that can be fulfilled in a quarter. Additionally, due to the outdoor nature of the sport, golf sales are influenced by the weather and inclement or unseasonable weather conditions can adversely affect the Company's operating results. In addition, sales of golf clubs are dependent on discretionary consumer spending, which may be affected by general economic conditions. A decrease in consumer spending generally could result in decreased spending on golf equipment, which could have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, operating results and financial condition. Any one or more of the above factors could result in the Company failing to achieve its expectations as to future sales or net income. Because in the short term most operating expenses are relatively fixed, the Company may be unable to adjust spending sufficiently in a timely manner to compensate in the event of any unexpected sales shortfall. Any such failure by the Company could materially adversely affect quarterly results of operations. If technological advances by competitors or other competitive factors require the Company to invest 15
SB-2/A18th Page of 84TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 18th
significantly greater resources than anticipated in research and development or sales and marketing efforts, the Company's business, operating results or financial condition could be materially adversely affected. Accordingly, the Company believes that comparisons of its results of operations on a period to period basis should not be relied upon as an indication of future performance. Additionally, the results on any quarter are not indicative of results to be expected for a full fiscal year. Fluctuations in operating results or any of the numerous other factors discussed above or below may result in certain future quarters in the Company's results of operations may be below the expectations of public market analysts or investors. In these events, the market price of the Common Stock and Warrants would be materially adversely affected. RESPONSIBILITY FOR MARKDOWNS In the apparel industry, the prices of products that are not sold by retailers in a timely manner are often marked down. It is customary in the industry for the seller of such products to share markdown costs with the retailers and the Company anticipates that it will share such costs with, to the extent they are incurred by, its major customers in order to maintain its relationships with such customers. POTENTIAL ACQUISITIONS The Company may in the future utilize a portion of the net proceeds of the Offering to pursue acquisitions of complementary services or businesses. Future acquisitions may result in potentially dilutive issuances of equity securities, the incurrence of additional debt, the write-off of costs, and the amortization of expenses related to goodwill and other intangible assets, all of which could have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, operating results and financial condition. Future acquisitions would involve numerous additional risks, including difficulties in the assimilation of the operations, services and personnel of the acquired company, the diversion of management's attention from other business concerns, entering markets in which the Company has little or no direct prior experience and the potential loss of key employees of the acquired company. The Company has not consummated any acquisitions and currently has no agreements or understandings with regard to any acquisitions. Shareholders will not vote on any potential acquisitions (unless required by NASDAQ regulations or applicable law) nor have the opportunity to review any potential acquisition candidate. See "-- Representative's Influence Over Potential Future Capital Financing." BROAD MANAGEMENT DISCRETION IN USE OF PROCEEDS The Company intends to use the net proceeds of the Offering for working capital and general corporate purposes, including potential acquisitions. Accordingly, the Company will have broad discretion with respect to the use of the net proceeds of the Offering. Purchasers of Common Stock in the Offering will not have the opportunity to evaluate the economic, financial or other information that the Company will use to determine the application of such proceeds. See "Use of Proceeds." LISTING AND MAINTENANCE CRITERIA FOR NASDAQ SYSTEM; "PENNY STOCK" REGULATIONS. The National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. (the "NASD"), which administers Nasdaq, requires, among other things, for a company's securities to be listed on the Nasdaq SmallCap Market, that the Company have at least $4,000,000 in total assets and a $5,000,000 market value of the public float. Further, initial listing requires three market makers and a minimum bid price of $4.00 per share. Continued inclusion in the Nasdaq SmallCap Market currently requires two market makers and a minimum bid price of $1.00 per share and a market value of the public float of at least $1,000,000 among other requirements. If the Company fails to maintain the Nasdaq minimum threshold requirements, it would lose Nasdaq listing and trading, if any, in the securities would be conducted in the over-the-counter market known as the NASD OTC Electronic Bulletin Board, or more commonly referred to as "pink 16
SB-2/A19th Page of 84TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 19th
sheets." As a result, an investor may find it more difficult to dispose of, or to obtain accurate quotations as to the market value of, the Company's Common Stock. The Commission has adopted regulations which generally define "penny stock" to be any equity security that has a market price (as defined) of less than $5.00 per share or an exercise price of less than $5.00 per share, subject to certain exceptions. If the Class A Common Stock and Warrants are accepted for quotation on Nasdaq, they will initially be exempt from the definition of "penny stock." If the Class A Common Stock and Warrants are later removed from listing by Nasdaq and are traded at a price below $5.00, the Class A Common Stock and Warrants may become subject to rules that impose additional sales practice requirements on broker-dealers who sell such Class A Common Stock and Warrants to persons other than established customers and institutional accredited investors. For transactions covered by these rules, the broker-dealer must make a special suitability determination for the purchase of such securities and have received the purchaser's written consent to the transaction prior to the purchase. Additionally, for any transaction involving a penny stock, unless exempt, the rules require the delivery, prior to the transaction, of a disclosure schedule prepared by the Commission relating to the penny stock market. The broker-dealer also must disclose the commissions payable to both the broker-dealer and the registered representative, current quotations for the securities, and, if the broker-dealer is the sole market-maker, the broker-dealer must disclose this fact and the broker-dealer's presumed control over the market. Finally, monthly statements must be sent disclosing recent price information for the penny stock held in the account and information on the limited market in penny stocks. Consequently, the "penny stock" rules may restrict the ability of broker-dealers to sell the Class A Common Stock and Warrants and may affect the ability of purchasers in this Offering to sell the Class A Common Stock and Warrants in the secondary market. REPRESENTATIVE'S INFLUENCE OVER POTENTIAL FUTURE CAPITAL FINANCING The Company has agreed that for a period of 24 months from the date of this Prospectus, it will not sell or otherwise dispose of any of its securities (with the exception of the shares of Common Stock issued upon exercise of currently outstanding options or warrants, and options granted under the Company's 1996 Incentive and Non-qualified Stock Option Plan or the Company's 1998 Incentive and Non-qualified Stock Option Plan) without the Representative's prior written consent. The Company has also agreed that, for a period of 24 months from the date of this Prospectus, it will not sell or issue any of its securities pursuant to Regulation S under the Securities Act nor any preferred stock without the Representative's prior written consent. These agreements represent significant potential restrictions on the Company's ability to raise capital or consummate any merger or acquisition through the sale or issuance of the Company's securities. Should the Company need to raise capital or complete a merger or acquisition transaction through the sale or issuance of its securities within the applicable time frame of these agreements, the refusal of the Representative to grant its consent would have a material adverse effect on the Company. The Representative has informed the Company that these agreements are for the purpose of encouraging the Company not to issue additional securities on terms that would be dilutive to investors who participate in this Offering, although there can be no assurance that additional sales of securities that may have dilutive effects will not occur. The Representative has further advised the Company that in determining whether consent will be granted the Representative will consider on a case-by-case basis, in addition to the potential dilution to existing shareholders, a number of factors, including the Company's current need for additional financing, the purposes for which the financing is sought, the cost and availability of alternative sources of non-equity financing and, in the case of a proposed acquisition, the type of business to be acquired, its relation to the Company's current business and the existence of alternative methods of financing the transaction. See "Underwriting." 17
SB-2/A20th Page of 84TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 20th
REPRESENTATIVE'S INFLUENCE THROUGH ABILITY TO SELECT A DIRECTOR The Company has agreed with the Representative that, promptly after the completion of this Offering, the Company will increase to five the number of individuals serving on the Company's Board of Directors. In addition, the Company has agreed with the Representative that, for a period of five years following the completion of the Offering, it will use its best efforts to cause the election to its Board of Directors, one designee of the Representative. This agreement will, as a practical matter, allow the Representative to continue to influence the management of the Company for a period of five years. PAYMENTS TO AFFILIATES The Company plans to use approximately $782,500 from the proceeds of the Offering to repay outstanding loans to certain stockholders. These stockholders currently hold Class A and Class B Common Stock of the Company as well as options and/or warrants to purchase additional shares in the following amounts and exercise prices. Paul H. Berger, the co-founder, Chairman of the Board of Directors, and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, will receive approximately $170,000. He currently owns 1,305,120 shares of the Class B Common Stock of the Company, 125,000 shares of the Class A Common Stock of the Company and has options to purchase 19,577 shares of Class A Common Stock at the exercise price of $0.225 per share. Jim G. Dodrill II, the co-founder, President, General Counsel, and a Director of the Company, will receive $102,500. He currently owns 159,833 shares of the Class B Common Stock of the Company, 25,000 shares of Class A Common Stock of the Company and has options to purchase 336,510 shares of Class A Common Stock at an average exercise price of $1.76 per share. Stanley Berger, father of Paul Berger and a member of the Company's Advisory Board, will receive $510,000. He currently owns none of the Class A or Class B Common Stock of the Company, but has warrants to purchase 108,002 shares of Class A Common Stock at an average exercise price of $1.73 and an option to purchase 4,444 of Class A Common Stock shares at the exercise price of $2.75 per shares. See "Use of Proceeds" and "Certain Transactions." CONTROL BY MANAGEMENT AND PRINCIPAL STOCKHOLDERS Upon completion of this Offering, Messrs. Berger and Dodrill will own 100% of the outstanding Class B Common Stock which together with their shares of Class A Common Stock and presently exercisable options represents approximately 36.7% of the outstanding Class A and Class B Common Stock of the Company, assuming no exercise of options, warrants or the over-allotment option. Although no voting arrangement exists among them, the Company's principal stockholders and current management will, as a practical matter, be able to control the outcome of most matters submitted for shareholder approval including the election of directors and amendments to the Company's Certificate of Incorporation and otherwise direct the affairs of the Company. See "Principal and Selling Shareholders." FUTURE SALES OF CLASS A COMMON STOCK PURSUANT TO RULE 144 The 2,566,771 shares of Class A and Class B Common Stock issued prior to this Offering are "restricted securities" as that term is defined by Rule 144 under the Securities Act, and in the future, may be sold in compliance with Rule 144 or pursuant to an effective registration statement. The 1,305,120 shares of Class B Common Stock owned by Mr. Berger and the 159,833 shares of Class B Common Stock owned by Mr. Dodrill are subject to the provisions of an agreement between the Company, the Representative and Messrs. Berger and Dodrill pursuant to which the Company has agreed not to register the Class B Common Stock for sale by either Mr. Berger or Mr. Dodrill. Ordinarily, under Rule 144, a person who has beneficially owned restricted securities for a period of one year may, every three months, sell in brokerage transactions an amount that does not exceed the greater of (i) 1% of the outstanding number of shares of a particular class of such securities or (ii) the average weekly trading volume in such securities on all national exchanges and/or reported through the automated quotation system of a registered securities association during the four weeks prior to the filing of a notice of sale by a securities holder. In the future, 18
SB-2/A21st Page of 84TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 21st
sales of restricted stock pursuant to Rule 144 may have an adverse effect on the market price of the Company's Class A Common Stock should a public trading market develop for such shares. Prior to this Offering, there has been no market for the Class A Common Stock. The Company can make no prediction as to the effect, if any, that sales of shares of Class A Common Stock, or the availability of such shares for sale, will have on the market price of Class A Common Stock prevailing from time to time. Nevertheless, sales of substantial amounts of Class A Common Stock in the public market could adversely affect prevailing market prices. SUBSTANTIAL SHARES OF CLASS A COMMON STOCK RESERVED FOR ISSUANCE PURSUANT TO STOCK OPTION PLAN The Company has reserved 1,150,000 and 800,000 shares of Class A Common Stock for issuance to employees, officers, directors, and consultants pursuant to option exercises under the Company's 1996 Incentive and Non-qualified Stock Option Plan and the Company's 1998 Incentive and Non-qualified Stock Option Plan, respectively. To date, the Company has granted options to purchase a total of 823,688 shares of Class A Common Stock, at prices ranging from $0.225 to $9.20 per share. The existence of these options may be perceived as an overhang on the market and therefor may prove to be a hindrance to the Company's future equity financing. Sales in the public market of substantial amounts of Class A Common Stock, or the perception that such sales could occur, could depress prevailing market prices for the Class A Common Stock. See "Management -- Stock Option Plans," "Certain Transactions" and "Underwriting." POSSIBLE ISSUANCE OF PREFERRED STOCK The Company's Certificate of Incorporation authorizes the issuance of up to 5,000,000 shares of preferred stock, $0.01 par value per share ("Preferred Stock"), with designations, rights, and preferences determined from time to time by its Board of Directors. Accordingly, the Company's Board of Directors is empowered, without stockholder approval, to issue Preferred Stock with dividends, liquidation, conversion, voting, or other rights that could adversely affect the voting power or other rights of the holders of Class A Common Stock. In the event of issuance, the Preferred Stock could be used, under certain circumstances, as a method of discouraging, delaying or preventing a change in control of the Company. See "-- Representative's Influence Over Potential Future Capital Financing" and "Description of Securities." SUBSTANTIAL DILUTION; DISPROPORTIONATE CONSIDERATION PAID BY NEW SHAREHOLDERS Based upon the net tangible book value of the Company at July 31, 1998, investors in this Offering will suffer an immediate and substantial dilution of their investment of approximately $5.39 or 77% in net tangible book value per share. The cash consideration paid by new investors in this Offering is 87.51% of the total consideration paid for the securities of the Company that will be outstanding after this Offering. To the extent outstanding options or warrants to purchase the Company's Class A Common Stock are exercised, there will be further dilution. See "Dilution." LACK OF PRIOR MARKET FOR THE CLASS A COMMON STOCK OR WARRANTS Prior to this Offering, there has been no public trading market for the Class A Common Stock or Warrants and there can be no assurances that a public trading market for the Class A Common Stock or Warrants will develop or, if developed, will be sustained. Although the Company has applied to list the Class A Common Stock and Warrants on the NASDAQ SmallCap Market, there can be no assurance that a regular trading market will develop for the Class A Common Stock or Warrants offered hereby, or, if developed, that it will be maintained. If for any reason the Company fails to maintain sufficient qualifications for continued listing on the NASDAQ SmallCap Market or a public trading market does not develop, purchasers of the Class A Common Stock or Warrants may have difficulty selling their Class A Common Stock or Warrants should they desire to do so. 19
SB-2/A22nd Page of 84TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 22nd
ARBITRARY DETERMINATION OF OFFERING PRICE AND WARRANT EXERCISE PRICE The initial public offering price of the Class A Common Stock and the Warrants and the Warrant exercise price have been determined by negotiations between the Company and the Representative and do not necessarily bear any relationship to the Company's assets, net worth or results of operations, or any other established criteria of value. The offering price set forth on the cover page of this Prospectus should not be considered an indication of the actual value of the Class A Common Stock and Warrants offered hereby. After completion of this offering, such price may vary as a result of market conditions and other factors. See "Description of Securities" and "Underwriting." IMPACT ON MARKET OF WARRANT EXERCISE In the event of the exercise of a substantial number of Warrants at the Warrant exercise price within a reasonably short period of time after the right to exercise commences, the resulting increase in the amount of Class A Common Stock of the Company in the trading market could materially adversely affect the market price of the Class A Common Stock. Futhermore, in the event of a redemption of the Warrants, Selling Warrantholder Warrants will cease to be subject to any lock-up restrictions and will be fully tradeable and the shares of Class A Common Stock underlying such Warrants will also be freely tradeable upon exercise of such Warrants. This increase in the number of Warrants and/or Shares of Class A Common Stock could materially adversely affect the market price of the Class A Common Stock and/or the Warrants. See "Description of Securities -- Warrants." RISK OF WARRANT CALL TO WARRANTHOLDERS The one million Warrants for sale in this Offering will be immediately exercisable. Furthermore, in the event of a redemption of the Selling Warrantholders' Warrants by the Company, an additional 1.75 million Warrants will be immediately exercisable. The resulting increase in the number of exercisable Warrants could materially adversely affect the market price of the Warrants sold in this Offering. The Warrants will be exercisable immediately upon issuance at a price per share of 115% of the initial public offering price of the Class A Common Stock for a period of three years and will be redeemable by the Company at a redemption price of $0.125 per Warrant at such time as the price per share of the Class A Common Stock reaches 120% of the initial public offering price of the Class A Common Stock for ten consecutive trading days. If the Company redeems the Warrants before the Warrantholders exercise their right of purchase, then the Warrantholders will be entitled to receive only the redemption price, $0.125 per Warrant. Because the difference in exercise price and redemption price of the Warrants is narrow, there is a substantial risk that the Warrantholders will have limited opportunity to exercise their Warrants. ADJUSTMENTS TO WARRANT EXERCISE PRICE AND EXERCISE DATE The Company, in it sole discretion, may reduce the exercise price of the Warrants and/or extend the time within which the Warrants may first be exercised. Further, in the event the Company issues certain securities or makes certain distributions to shareholders, the exercise price of the Warrants may be reduced. Any such price reductions (assuming exercise of the Warrants) will provide less money for the Company and possibly materially adversely affect the market price of the Class A Common Stock and Warrants. REDEMPTION OF REDEEMABLE WARRANTS The Warrants are subject to redemption by the Company, at any time, at a price of $0.125 per Warrant upon 30 days prior written notice to the holders thereof, if the average closing bid price for the Class A Common Stock equals or exceeds 120% of the initial public offering price for the Class A Common Stock for ten consecutive trading days. In the event that the Warrants are called for redemption by the Company, holders thereof will have 30 days during which they may exercise their rights to purchase shares of Class A 20
SB-2/A23rd Page of 84TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 23rd
Common Stock. In the event a current prospectus is not available, the Warrants may not be exercised and the Company will be precluded from redeeming the Warrants. If holders of the Warrants elect not to exercise them upon notice of redemption thereof, and the Warrants are subsequently redeemed prior to exercise, the holders thereof would lose the benefit of the difference, if any, between the market price of the underlying Class A Common Stock as of such date and the exercise price of such Warrants, as well as any possible future price appreciation in the Class A Common Stock. As a result of an exercise of the Warrants, existing shareholders would be diluted and the market price of the Class A Common Stock may be adversely affected. If holders of the Warrants fail to exercise their rights under the Warrants prior to the date set for redemption, then they will be entitled to receive only the redemption price, $0.125 per Warrant. See "Description of Securities -- Warrants." POSSIBLE RESTRICTIONS ON MARKET MAKING ACTIVITIES IN THE CLASS A COMMON STOCK AND WARRANTS Although they have no legal obligation to do so, the Underwriters from time to time may act as market makers and otherwise effect transactions in the Class A Common Stock and Warrants. Unless granted an exemption by the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Commission") from Rule 103 of Regulation M under the Exchange Act, the Underwriters will be prohibited from engaging in any market making activities or solicited brokerage activities with respect to the Class A Common Stock and Warrants for the period from five business days prior to any solicitation of the exercise of any Warrant or five business days prior to the exercise of any Warrant based on a prior solicitation until the later of the termination of such solicitation activity or the termination (by waiver or otherwise) of any right the Underwriters may have to receive such a fee for the exercise of the Warrants following such solicitation. As a result, the Underwriters may be unable to continue to provide a market for the Class A Common Stock and Warrants during certain periods while the Warrants are exercisable. The prices and liquidity of the Class A Common Stock and Warrants may be materially and adversely affected by the cessation of the Underwriters market making activities. In addition, there is no assurance that the Underwriters will continue to be market makers in the Class A Common Stock and Warrants. The prices and liquidity of the Class A Common Stock and Warrants may be affected significantly by the degree, if any, of the Underwriters' participation in the market. The Underwriters may voluntarily discontinue such participation at any time. Further, the market for, and liquidity of, the Class A Common Stock and Warrants may be adversely affected by the fact that a significant amount of the Class A Common Stock and Warrants may be sold to customers of the Underwriters. See "Underwriting." CURRENT PROSPECTUS AND STATE BLUE SKY REGISTRATION IN CONNECTION WITH THE EXERCISE OF THE WARRANTS The Company will be able to issue shares of its Class A Common Stock upon the exercise of the Warrants only if (i) there is a current prospectus relating to the Class A Common Stock issuable upon exercise of the Warrants under an effective registration statement filed with the Commission and (ii) such Class A Common Stock is then qualified for sale or exempt therefrom under applicable state securities laws of the jurisdictions in which the various holders of Warrants reside. Although the Company will undertake to use its best efforts to maintain the effectiveness of a current prospectus covering the Class A Common Stock subject to the Warrants offered hereby, there can be no assurance that the Company will be successful in doing so. After a registration statement becomes effective, it may require continuous updating by the filing of post-effective amendments. A post-effective amendment is required (i) when, for a prospectus that is used more than nine months after the effective date of the registration statement, the information contained therein (including the audited financial statements) is as of a date more than 16 months prior to the use of the prospectus, (ii) when facts or events have occurred which represent a fundamental change in the information contained in the registration statement, or (iii) when any material change occurs in the information relating to the plan of distribution of the securities registered by such registration statement. The Company anticipates that this Registration Statement will remain effective for at least nine months following the date of this Prospectus, assuming a post-effective amendment is not filed by the Company. The Company intends to qualify the sale of the Class A Common Stock and Warrants in a 21
SB-2/A24th Page of 84TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 24th
limited number of states, although certain exemptions under certain state securities laws may permit the Warrants to be transferred to purchasers in states other than those in which the Warrants were initially qualified. The Company will be prevented, however, from issuing Class A Common Stock upon exercise of the Warrants in those states where exemptions are unavailable and the Company has failed to qualify the Class A Common Stock upon exercise of the Warrants. The Company may decide not to seek, or may not be able to obtain, qualification of the issuance of such Class A Common Stock in all of the states in which the ultimate purchasers of the Warrants reside. In such a case, the Warrants of those purchasers will expire and have no value if such Warrants cannot be exercised or sold. Accordingly, the market for the Warrants may be limited because of the foregoing requirements. See "Description of Securities." REPRESENTATIVE'S WARRANTS In connection with the Offering, the Company will sell to the Representative, for nominal consideration, warrants to purchase an aggregate of 250,000 shares of Class A Common Stock and 50,000 Warrants. The Representative's Warrants will be exercisable for a period of four years, commencing one year after the effective date of the Registration Statement of which this Prospectus is a part, at an exercise price of 120% of the initial public offering price of the Class A Common Stock and Warrants. The holder of the Representative's Warrants will have the opportunity to profit from a rise in the market price of the Securities, if any, without assuming the risk of ownership. The Company may find it more difficult to raise additional equity capital if it should be needed for the business of the Company while the Representative's Warrants are outstanding. At any time when the holder thereof might be expected to exercise them, the Company would probably be able to obtain additional capital on terms more favorable than those provided by the Representative's Warrants. The Representative has demand and "piggyback" registration rights with respect to the Class A Common Stock owned by the Representative, the Representative's Warrants and the Class A Common Stock and Warrants issuable upon exercise of the Representative's Warrants. Any future exercise of these registration rights may cause the Company to incur substantial expense and could impair the Company's ability to raise capital through the public sale of its securities. See "Dilution," "Shares Available for Future Sale" and "Underwriting." NO DIVIDENDS ANTICIPATED The Company has never paid any dividends. It expects that it will retain its earnings, if any, for the foreseeable future to finance its operations and will not pay dividends to investors. LIMITED LIABILITY OF DIRECTORS As permitted by the Delaware General Corporation Law, the Company's Certificate of Incorporation eliminated personal liability of a director to the Company and its stockholders for monetary damages for breach of fiduciary duty as a director, except in certain circumstances. Accordingly, stockholders may have limited rights to recover money damages against the Company's directors for breach of fiduciary duty. 22
SB-2/A25th Page of 84TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 25th
USE OF PROCEEDS The net proceeds to be received by the Company from the sale of the shares of Class A Common Stock and Warrants offered by the Company hereby are estimated at approximately $15,362,500, based on an assumed initial public offering prices of $7.00 per shares of Class A Common Stock and $0.125 per Warrant (approximately $16,009,375 if the Underwriters' over-allotment option is exercised in full). The Company expects such net proceeds (assuming no exercise of the Underwriters' over-allotment option) to be utilized in approximately the manner set forth in the following table: [Enlarge/Download Table] APPROXIMATE APPROXIMATE PERCENTAGE OF APPLICATION OF PROCEEDS DOLLAR AMOUNT NET PROCEEDS ------------------------------------------------------------------------ -------------- ------------------------- Repayment of existing bridge debt (1)................................... $ 6,062,500 39.46% Purchase of Inventory................................................... 1,950,000 12.69 Advertising and Marketing............................................... 1,750,000 11.39 Purchase of Fixed Assets................................................ 200,000 1.30 Working capital and general corporate purposes (2)...................... 5,400,000 35.16 -------------- ------ Total............................................................... $ 15,362,500 100.00% -------------- ------ -------------- ------ -------------------------- (1) Of the $6,062,500, $1,360,000 was loaned at an interest rate of 12.5% and $525,000 was loaned at an interest rate of 15%. The remainder was loaned without a term interest rate, but with an option to receive a $3,125 lump-sum payment per $50,000 of indebtedness. The maturity date for $1,975,000 of the bridge debt is September 30, 1998, and for $3,505,000 of the bridge debt the maturity date is October 15, 1998. See "Risk Factors -- Lack of Cash." Of the $6,062,500, $4,630,000 was received within the past year and the proceeds were used for payroll and benefits, rent, utilities, acquisition of inventory, distribution costs, manufacturing costs, advertising costs and other overhead expenses. In addition, $272,500 consisted of advances from officers. Of the $6,062,500, approximately $782,500 will be used to repay affiliates of the Company. See "Certain Transactions." (2) Includes payroll and benefits, rent, utilities, acquisition of inventory, distribution costs, manufacturing costs, advertising costs and other overhead expenses. A portion of the net proceeds may be used for acquisitions. Although the Company is engaged from time to time in discussions relating to possible acquisitions, the Company presently has no agreements, understandings or commitments with respect to any acquisitions. The foregoing represents the Company's current estimate of its allocation of the net proceeds of this Offering based upon the current status of its business operations, its current plans, and current economic and industry conditions. Future events, as well as changes in economic or competitive conditions or the Company's business and the results of the Company's sales and marketing activities, may make different uses of funds necessary or desirable. The Company will require the consent of the Representative to engage in any such transations. See "Risk Factors -- Representative's Influence Over Potential Future Capital Financing." If the Underwriters exercise the over-allotment option in full, the Company will realize additional net proceeds of approximately $646,875, which will be added to the Company's working capital. The Company believes that the proceeds of this Offering, together with cash flow from operations, will be sufficient to satisfy its contemplated cash requirements for the next 18 months. The Company's financial requirements will depend upon, among other things, the growth rate of the Company's business, the amount of cash flow generated by operations and the company's ability to borrow funds to produce inventory or for working capital purposes. Should the Company require additional debt or equity financing to support its operations, there can be no assurance that such additional financing will be available to the Company on commercially reasonable terms, or at all. Proceeds not immediately required for the purposes described above will be invested principally in United States government securities, short term certificates of deposit, money market funds or other short-term interest bearing investments. The Company anticipates that the proceeds, if any, received from any exercise of the Warrants or the Underwriters' Warrants (or the Warrants included therein) will be utilized for working capital and other corporate purposes. 23
SB-2/A26th Page of 84TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 26th
DILUTION The difference between the initial public offering price per share of Class A Common Stock and the pro forma net tangible book value per share of Class A Common Stock after this Offering constitutes the dilution to investors in this Offering. Net tangible book value per share is determined by dividing the net tangible book value of the Company (total assets less intangible assets and liabilities) by the total number of shares of Class A and Class B Common Stock outstanding. At July 31, 1998 the net tangible deficit of the Company was ($7,196,694), or approximately ($2.80) per share. After giving effect to the sale by the Company of the 2,500,000 shares of Class A Common Stock in this Offering (at an assumed offering price of $7.00 per share) and the 1,000,000 Warrants in this Offering (at an assumed offering price of $.125 per Warrant) and the Company's use of the estimated net proceeds therefrom as set forth under "Use of Proceeds," the pro forma net tangible book value of the Class A Common Stock at July 31, 1998 would have been $8,165,806 or approximately $1.61 per share. This represents an immediate pro forma increase in net tangible book value of $4.41 per share to the Company's present shareholders and an immediate pro forma dilution of $5.39 per share to the purchasers of shares of Class A Common Stock in this Offering. The following table illustrates this per share dilution: [Download Table] Assumed initial public offering price (per share of Class A Common Stock) (1)..................................... $ 7.00 Net tangible deficit per share at July 31, 1998........... $ (2.80) Increase per share attributable to shares offered hereby.................................................. $ 4.41 --------- Pro forma net tangible book value per share after the Offering................................................ $ 1.61 --------- Dilution of net tangible book value per share to purchasers in this Offering (2)......................... $ 5.39 --------- --------- ------------------------ (1) Represents the assumed initial public offering price per share of Class A Common Stock before deduction of the underwriting discount and estimated expenses of the Offering. (2) Assuming no exercise of Warrants or the Underwriters' over-allotment option. See "Description of Securities" and "Underwriting." The following table sets forth on a pro forma basis as of July 31, 1998, the number and percentage of shares of Class A and Class B Common Stock issued, and the amount and percentage of consideration and average price per share paid by existing shareholders of the Company, and to be paid by purchasers pursuant to this Offering (based upon an assumed initial public offering price of $7.00 per share of Class A Common Stock and before deducting the underwriting discount and estimated expenses of this Offering): [Enlarge/Download Table] OWNERSHIP ---------------------- CONSIDERATION NUMBER ------------------------- AVERAGE PRICE OF SHARES PERCENT AMOUNT PERCENT PER SHARE ---------- ---------- ------------- ---------- --------------- Existing Shareholders.......................... 2,566,771 50.66% $ 2,497,246 12.49% $ 0.97 New Shareholders............................... 2,500,000 49.34% 17,500,000 87.51% $ 7.00 ---------- ---------- ------------- ---------- Total.................................... 5,066,771 100.00% $ 19,997,246 100.00% $ 3.95 ---------- ---------- ------------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ------------- ---------- The foregoing table gives effect to the sale of the shares of Class A Common Stock offered hereby and does not give effect to the exercise of the Underwriters' over-allotment option, any Warrants or the Underwriters' Warrants. 24
SB-2/A27th Page of 84TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 27th
CAPITALIZATION The following table sets forth the capitalization of the Company as of July 31, 1998 and as adjusted giving effect to the sale by the Company of the 2,500,000 shares of Class A Common Stock and 1,000,000 Warrants offered hereby. The table has not been adjusted to give effect to the exercise of the Underwriter's over-allotment option, the exercise of the Warrants, or the exercise of the Underwriters' Warrants. This table should be read in conjunction with the Financial Statements, including the notes thereto, appearing elsewhere in this Prospectus. [Enlarge/Download Table] JULY 31, 1998 ----------------------------- PRO FORMA AS ACTUAL ADJUSTED(1) ------------- -------------- Cash............................................................................... $ 1,621 $ 9,301,621 ------------- -------------- Advances from officers............................................................. 272,500 -- ------------- -------------- Notes payable...................................................................... 5,865,000 75,000 ------------- -------------- Shareholders' deficit: Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share, (8,100,000 shares authorized, 2,566,771 shares issued and 2,516,771 outstanding; as adjusted, 5,066,771 shares issued and 5,016,771 outstanding) (2)................................................. 25,668 50,668 Treasury Stock -- 50,000 shares.................................................... (19,300) (19,300) Additional paid-in capital....................................................... 2,718,329 17,893,329 Warrants......................................................................... -- 162,500 Accumulated deficit.............................................................. (9,921,391) (9,921,391) ------------- -------------- Total shareholders (deficit) equity.......................................... (7,196,694) 8,165,806 ------------- -------------- Total capitalization......................................................... $ (1,057,573) $ 17,542,427 ------------- -------------- ------------- -------------- ------------------------ (1) Assumes (i) an initial public offering price of $7.00 per share and $0.125 per Warrant, (ii) deduction of underwriting commissions assumed to be 10%, estimated offering expenses payable by the Company of $500,000 and repayment of $5,790,000 of indebtedness and $272,500 of advances from officers, and (iii) an estimated value of the Representative's Warrant of $37,500. (2) Does not include (i) the 1,000,000 shares of Class A Common Stock issuable upon the exercise of the Warrants offered hereby, (ii) the 100,000 shares of Class A Common Stock and 150,000 Warrants issuable upon exercise of the Underwriters' over-allotment option, (iii) the 150,000 shares of Class A Common Stock issuable upon exercise of the Warrants included in the Underwriters' over-allotment option, (iv) the 250,000 shares of Class A Common Stock and the 50,000 Warrants issuable upon exercise of the Representative's Warrants (or the 50,000 shares of Class A Common Stock issuable upon exercise of the Warrants included therein), (v) 2,036,170 shares of Class A Common Stock issuable upon the exercise of stock options and warrants outstanding on the date hereof. DIVIDEND POLICY The Company intends to retain any future earnings for the operation and expansion of its business and does not anticipate paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable future. Any future determination as to the payment of cash dividends will depend upon a number of factors, including the Company's earnings, capital requirements, financial condition and other factors considered relevant by the Company's Board of Directors. 25
SB-2/A28th Page of 84TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 28th
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA The following selected financial data, insofar as it relates to the period February 8, 1996 (inception) to January 31, 1998 and the year ended January 31, 1998, has been derived from the Company's financial statements, including the balance sheets at January 31, 1997 and 1998 and the related statements of operations, of changes in shareholders' deficit and of cash flows for the periods then ended, and notes thereto appearing elsewhere herein. The data for the six months ended July 31, 1997 and 1998 has been derived from unaudited financial statements also appearing herein and which, in the opinion of management, include all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair statement of the results for the unaudited interim periods. The selected financial data should be read in conjunction with the "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" and the Company's financial statements and notes thereto appearing elsewhere herein. The results of operations for the six months ended July 31, 1998 are not necessarily indicative of future results. [Enlarge/Download Table] FOR THE PERIOD FEBRUARY 8, 1996 FOR THE YEAR FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED (INCEPTION) TO ENDED JULY 31, JANUARY 31, JANUARY 31, ---------------------------- 1997 1998 1997 1998 --------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS DATA: Revenue............................................ $ -- $ 741,120 $ 267,547 $ 440,474 Costs of sales..................................... -- 859,317 300,028 520,179 Research and development........................... 650,805 451,019 185,078 102,235 Stock-based compensation........................... 473,894 210,130 133,583 -- Selling, general and administrative expenses....... 1,251,009 3,669,657 1,294,715 2,755,609 Total costs and expenses........................... 2,375,708 5,190,123 1,913,404 3,378,023 Loss from operations............................... (2,375,708) (4,449,003) (1,645,857) (2,937,549) Interest expense................................... (2,844) (244,648) (76,555) (325,636) Gain on sale of license............................ -- -- -- 413,997 Net loss........................................... $ (2,378,552) $ (4,693,651) $ (1,722,412) $ (2,849,188) Basic and diluted loss per share of Common Stock... $ (3.24) $ (2.21) $ (1.48) $ (1.17) Weighted average number of common shares outstanding (1).................................. 734,330 2,120,460 1,162,539 2,425,197 [Enlarge/Download Table] AS OF JULY 31, 1998 ---------------------------- AS ACTUAL ADJUSTED(2) ------------- ------------- BALANCE SHEET DATA: Current assets...................................................................... $ 1,135,979 $ 10,435,979 Working (deficit) capital........................................................... $ (7,679,293) $ 7,683,207 Total assets........................................................................ $ 1,658,578 $ 10,958,579 Total liabilities................................................................... $ 8,855,272 $ 2,792,772 Stockholders' (deficit) equity...................................................... $ (7,196,694) $ 8,165,806 ------------------------ (1) Adjusted to give retroactive effect to a number of stock splits and reverse stock splits as described in Note 6 to the Company's Financial Statements included elsewhere in this Prospectus. (2) Adjusted to reflect the sale of the 2,500,000 shares of Class A Common Stock and 1,000,000 Warrants offered by the Company hereby at an assumed public offering price of $7.00 per share and $.125 per Warrant and the initial application of the estimated net proceeds to the Company as described under "Use of Proceeds." 26
SB-2/A29th Page of 84TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 29th
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS The following analysis of the Company's financial condition as of and for the fiscal year ended January 31, 1998 and for the period from February 8, 1996 (inception) through January 31, 1997 and for the Company's results of operations for the six month periods ended July 31, 1998 and 1997 should be read in conjunction with the Company's financial statements and notes thereto included elsewhere in this Prospectus. RESULTS OF OPERATIONS Sales during the year ended January 31, 1998 totaled $741,120. There were no sales during the period February 8, 1996 (inception) to January 31, 1997. Of the sales during the year ended January 31, 1998, $588,514 were generated by sales of HiPPO products and $152,606 by sales of Tegra products. Sales during the six months ended July 31, 1998 totaled $440,474 compared to sales of $267,547 during the same period in 1997. Of the sales during the six months ended July 31, 1998, $22,395 were generated by sales of HiPPO products and $418,079 by sales of Tegra products. The sales recognized during the six months ended July 31, 1997 represent HiPPO club and apparel sales. The Company introduced the HiPPO line in July of 1997 and the Tegra line in October of 1997. Sales during both the year ended January 31, 1998 and the six months ended July 31, 1998 were negatively impacted because the Company was not able to purchase inventory to fill customer orders as a result of the Company's inadequate working capital and lack of open terms with its vendors. The Company believes that the absence of sufficient working capital has historically prevented the Company from taking full advantage of demand for its products. Likewise, the Company believes that the lack of open terms with its vendors contributed to preventing the Company from meeting this demand. In May of 1998 the Company sold its license to sell HiPPO products in the U.S. back to Hippo Holdings, Ltd. along with all existing HiPPO inventory, marketing materials and related liabilities. In return, the Company received a cash payment from Hippo Holdings, Ltd. of approximately $413,000. In addition Hippo Holdings, Ltd. returned to the Company 50,000 shares of the Company's common stock and assumed commitments of the Company in excess of $1,000,000. Accordingly, the Company has ceased selling HiPPO products and does not expect to receive revenue on a going forward basis from such brand. Costs of sales during the year ended January 31, 1998 totaled $859,317. Of this amount, approximately $89,343 reflects costs associated with air freighting goods from manufacturing facilities, which are in Asia, to the Company's warehouse in Miami, Florida. Cost of sales during the six months ended July 31, 1998 totaled $520,179. Of this amount, $28,895 reflects costs associated with air freighting goods to the Company's warehouse in Miami, Florida. The cost of air freight was necessitated by the Company's marginal working capital position which limited the Company's ability to place orders as far in advance as would otherwise be desirable or to maintain inventory to support demand. The Company's shortage of working capital required the Company to attempt to shorten lead times involved in production and shipping of goods in order to deliver product as quickly as possible to its customers. Other incremental delivery costs of $47,787 also adversely impacted cost of sales for the year ending January 31, 1998. Additional production cost variances of $52,218 in material and assembly charges attributed to smaller production runs and manufacturing carrying charges than the Company expects would have been the case if it were in a better working capital position also adversely impacted cost of sales for the year ending January 31, 1998. Costs of sales in comparison to sales for the year ended January 31, 1998 was negatively impacted by the liquidation of apparel for $85,356 with a cost of $151,089. Cost of sales for the six months ended July 31, 1998 were also negatively impacted by a $142,157 provision for liquidation of apparel. 27
SB-2/A30th Page of 84TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 30th
Research and development costs totaled $451,019 for the year ended January 31, 1998 as compared to $650,805 for the period ended January 31, 1997. This 31% decrease resulted from reduced spending associated with final development of Tegra golf equipment. Research and development costs totaled $102,235 for the six months ended July 31, 1998 as compared to $185,078 for the six months ended July 31, 1997. This 45% decrease is attributed primarily to timing in recognition of research and development costs. The Company expects that its research and development costs will continue to decline for the rest of fiscal year 1998, but may increase thereafter as the Company undertakes new projects. During the year ended January 31, 1998 the Company incurred a royalty expense of $16,681 to Hippo Holdings, Ltd. in connection with sales of HiPPO products. Because all such sales have been terminated, the Company will no longer have any royalty expenses to Hippo Holdings, Ltd. Selling, general and administrative expenses totaled $3,669,657 for the year ended January 31, 1998 as compared to $1,251,009 for the period ended January 31, 1997. This increase resulted primarily from increased advertising and promotion spending and development costs and growth in employment and related costs. Selling, general and administrative expenses totaled $2,755,609 for the six months ended July 31, 1998 as compared to $1,294,715 for the six months ended July 31, 1997. This 213% increase resulted primarily from increased payroll and related expenses, advertising and promotion, travel, professional fees and facilities, supplies and services. FORECAST The Company has installed 58 TREs in 55 cities. The Company is in the process of opening additional accounts and installing additional TREs. The Company expects to have products available in 300 stores by year end and to open up to 100 new TREs for Spring, 1999. The Company expects sales of Tegra products to increase as existing and potential retailers and consumers gain familiarity with the Tegra brand and the benefits offered by the Company's product lines and as additional accounts are opened and TREs are installed. The Company plans to use $1,750,000 of the proceeds from the Offering for marketing and advertising efforts. See "Use of Proceeds." The Company anticipates that its cost of goods sold will decrease with increased volume of purchasing and lower costs associated with shipping product as the Company's working capital position improves. The Company anticipates that within the 12 months subsequent to the closing of the Offering it will hire an additional 20 people. Of these 20 people, 5 are expected to be hired for sales positions. These individuals will primarily be territory managers responsible for sales to specific accounts within a defined geographic region. The Company also anticipates that 5 of these 20 people will work in customer service and the remaining 10 in support, administrative and distribution positions. YEAR 2000 COMPLIANCE Many existing computer systems and applications and other control devices use only two digits to identify a year in the date field, without considering the impact of the upcoming change in the century. As a result, as year 2000 approaches, computer systems and applications used by many companies may need to be upgraded to comply with "Year 2000" requirements. The Company relies on its systems in operating and monitoring many significant aspects of its business, including financial systems (such as general ledger, accounts payable, accounts receivable, inventory and order management), customer services, infrastructure and network and telecommunications equipment. The Company also relies directly and indirectly on the systems of external business enterprises such as customers, suppliers, creditors, financial organizations and domestic and international governments. The Company currently estimates that its costs associated with Year 2000 compliance, including any costs associated with the consequences of incomplete or untimely 28
SB-2/A31st Page of 84TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 31st
resolution of Year 2000 compliance issues, will not have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, financial condition or results of operations. However, the Company has not exhaustively investigated and does not believe it has fully identified the impact of Year 2000 compliance and has not concluded that it can resolve any issues that may arise in complying with Year 2000 without disruption of its business or without incurring significant expense. In addition, even if the Company's internal systems are not materially affected by Year 2000 compliance issues, the Company could be affected through disruption in the operation of the enterprises with which the Company interacts. LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES The Company's primary source of liquidity has historically consisted of sales of equity securities and high yield debt borrowings. During the year ended January 31, 1998 the Company borrowed $1,870,500 from unaffiliated individuals at interest rates ranging from 9.4% to 24% and with a weighted average rate of 13.4%. Additionally, the Company borrowed $782,500 from individuals who either are officers of the Company or are affiliated with or related to officers of the Company. These borrowings will be repaid from the proceeds of this Offering. See "Use of Proceeds" and "Certain Transactions." At January 31, 1998, the Company was in default of the terms of certain 12.5% and 15% unsecured notes payable to private investors which were due during September 1997. During February 1998, the Company obtained a specific waiver to extend the maturity of the then outstanding unsecured notes payable through the earlier of September 30, 1998 or within 5 days after an initial public offering of the Company's common stock generating in excess of $7.5 million of gross proceeds. The Company has developed and implemented strategies to meet ongoing and future liquidity needs. These strategies include (i) obtaining funds from a private placement of securities of the Company which was completed in June, 1998; (ii) an initial public offering of the Company's Class A Common Stock and (iii) arranging for working capital financing on inventory and receivables to assist in cash flow. The management of the Company believes that these actions along with a tighter control on overall costs will allow the Company to meet its liquidity needs for the next 18 months. Pursuant to the terms of a factoring agreement, the Company assigns substantially all of its accounts receivable to a factor with recourse. The Company is able to borrow up to 50% of eligible accounts receivable, as defined, up to a maximum amount of $1 million. Advances from the factor incur interest at 24% per annum. Receivables assigned to the factor are subject to a charge of 3.0% of the face amount of the receivable. The advances from the factor are secured by all the Company's assets. During the year ended January 31, 1998, the Company incurred interest and factoring charges of $10,059 and $7,739, respectively. The factoring agreement was for an initial term of six months and renews for successive twelve month periods thereafter, unless cancelled by the Company or the factor. At January 31, 1998, the Company had received advances of approximately $115,000 in excess of those permitted under the factoring agreement, resulting in the Company being in default of such agreement. As a result of the default, the factor had the right to terminate the agreement and demand payment of the funds advanced. Subsequent to year end, the Company has reduced the amounts outstanding under the factoring agreement and is currently within the borrowing base of such agreement. The Company has held discussions with a purchase order financing institution regarding opening a purchase order financing arrangement. The Company has received a commitment from this institution to enter such an arrangement conditioned on the Company reducing its accounts payable to within current reasonable terms. The closing of this Offering will allow the Company to reduce accounts payable to a point where the Company expects to be able to enter into such purchase order financing arrangement. See "Use of Proceeds." One of the Company's most significant commitments is to Ian Woosnam as a worldwide spokesperson for the Tegra brand. As of July 31, 1998, the Company owed Mr. Woosnam approximately $550,000 for services rendered since January 1, 1998. If the Company is able to successfully negotiate an endorsement 29
SB-2/A32nd Page of 84TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 32nd
contract with Mr. Woosnam, the Company expects to pay Mr. Woosnam approximately $1,150,000 annually during the term of the agreement. The Company currently expects the term of the agreement to be nine years. See "Business -- Marketing -- Endorsements." SEASONALITY The business of the Company is subject to seasonal fluctuations. Historically, companies in the golf industry have seen their greatest sales in the first half of the calendar year, and the business of the Company is particularly dependent on sales during these months. Nevertheless, the Company believes that, in the near term, its sales may not reflect this seasonality because the opening of new accounts during the second half of 1998 will outweigh seasonal effects, which the Company expects may increase its sales during this period. 30
SB-2/A33rd Page of 84TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 33rd
BUSINESS GENERAL The Company is a designer, marketer and manufacturer of premium quality golf equipment, apparel and accessories under the Tegra brand name. Tegra products represent a wide range of technologically innovative, premium-priced men's golf clubs, apparel and accessories that are sold in off-course golf specialty and on-course pro shops. Tegra golf clubs incorporate the Company's patent-pending Invisible Inset Hosel (the cylindrical chamber in which the shaft is attached to the club head), a feature designed to increase the accuracy and distance of golf shots, and were introduced into the US market in October 1997. In the spring of 1998, the Company began installing dedicated Tegra Retail Environments ("TREs") in select golf stores across the country and shipping a Tegra men's apparel line. TREs are defined spaces in golf shops which house the Company's equipment, apparel and accessories in an integrated, branded selling environment. The Company has installed 58 TREs in golf stores in 55 cities. The Company is in the process of opening additional TREs and expects to install up to 100 new TREs for the Spring, 1999 selling season. Tegra products are now available in over 170 golf shops nationwide and the Company expects they will be available in 300 golf shops by year end. In addition, the Company expects to have products available in 1,000 stores by Spring, 1999. Professional golfers Ian Woosnam and Glen Day began endorsing Tegra products in January, 1998. The Company is currently negotiating an agreement with Mr. Woosnam for him to continue his endorsement through December 31, 2006. GOLF INDUSTRY OVERVIEW According to the National Golf Foundation ("NGF"), there are approximately 48 million golfers worldwide, including approximately 25 million in the U.S. In 1997, golfers in the U.S. played an estimated 547 million rounds of golf and, according to the National Sporting Goods Association, are estimated to have spent $5.8 billion on golf equipment, apparel and accessories. Of the 25 million U.S. golfers, about 5.2 million, characterized by the NGF as "avid golfers," play over 25 rounds of golf per year. The Company believes that avid golfers are the first to seek out performance-oriented golf equipment and generally drive golf club product trends. According to the NFG in 1997, wholesale sales of golf equipment in the U.S. were approximately $3.9 billion. In addition, wholesale sales of golf clubs increased at an annual compound growth rate of approximately 10.9% over the 5-year period from 1992 to 1997. The Company believes that sales of golf clubs will continue to grow in the future due to a number of factors including: FAVORABLE POPULATION TRENDS. The Company believes that the aging of Baby Boomers (those born between 1946 and 1964) and the emergence of the Baby Boomers' children (those born between 1977 and 1995) are likely to increase the demand for golf products generally. As golfers age, they tend to play golf more often and spend more money on the sport, particularly in the over-50 age group. Accordingly, because a majority of Baby Boomers are entering their 40s and 50s, the Company expects interest in and spending on golf to increase. Further, because Baby Boomers' children are beginning to enter their 20s, the age most golfers begin to play the sport, the Company believes they will further increase their participation in and spending on golf. INCREASING AVAILABILITY OF GOLF FACILITIES. According to the NGF, approximately 350 new golf courses will open in the U.S. annually between 1998 and the year 2000. The Company believes that these additional facilities will make golf more accessible and convenient, leading to a further increase in golf participation rates. INCREASING INTEREST FROM NON-TRADITIONAL GOLFERS. The Company believes that golf has become increasingly attractive to segments of the population that have not historically been well-represented among golfers. Most notably, Tiger Woods has made golf more appealing to junior and minority golfers. According to the NGF, the total number of beginning and junior golfers increased by over 40% in 1997 31
SB-2/A34th Page of 84TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 34th
compared to the previous year. In addition, the success of the Ladies Professional Golf Association (the "LPGA") Tour and such female golfers as Annika Sorenstam have increased the appeal of the sport to women. NEW PRODUCT INNOVATIONS. In recent years, the golf equipment industry has made significant advances in product designs and technologies to enhance golfers' performance and overall enjoyment of the game. The Company believes that this rapid evolution of golf clubs accelerates the rate at which golfers purchase new or additional clubs. COMPANY HISTORY The Company was founded as Hippo, Inc. in February 1996, with the goal of becoming a leading U.S. golf equipment and apparel manufacturer. To that end the Company entered into a licensing agreement with Hippo Holdings, Ltd, a leading manufacturer of value-priced golf equipment in Europe, to manufacture, market and distribute the HiPPO brand of golf equipment in the United States and Canada. The Company began shipments of HiPPO products in July of 1997 and for the ten month period ending April 30, 1998 sold approximately $500,000 in HiPPO clubs. The Company has since discontinued the distribution of value-priced golf equipment to pursue opportunities in the premium-priced end of the market offered by Tegra products. In June of 1996, the Company initiated a significant research and development project to develop new, visibly distinct technology for its golf clubs with which to enter the premium-priced segment of the U.S. golf market. The premium-priced segment of the golf market captures the largest portion of consumer spending with approximately 70% of consumer dollars being spent on premium clubs. In addition, manufacturers margins on premium clubs are typically significantly higher than on value-priced equipment. This research led to the Company's development of its patent-pending Invisible Inset Hosel and bullet shaped driver technology. These new technologies have become the key technological elements of the Tegra brand of golf equipment. To improve its margins and profits, the Company added the Tegra brand of premium golf equipment and accessories at the premium-priced segment of the market. In January, 1998 the Company changed its name to Outlook Sports Technology, Inc. Management believes that this name better reflects the attitude and spirit of the Company, as a forward thinking and technologically advanced sporting goods manufacturer, than its prior name. In April, 1998 the Company was approached by Hippo Holdings, Ltd. to reacquire the rights to the HiPPO brand in the United States and Canada. On May 4, 1998 the Company sold its license to sell HiPPO-TM- products in the U.S. back to Hippo Holdings, Ltd. along with all existing HiPPO-TM- inventory, marketing materials and related liabilities. In return, the Company received a cash payment from Hippo Holdings, Ltd. of approximately $413,000. In addition Hippo Holdings, Ltd. returned to the Company 50,000 shares of the Company's common stock and assumed outstanding liabilities and commitments of the Company in excess of $1,000,000. COMPANY PRODUCTS TEGRA GOLF CLUBS. Tegra woods and irons with the Company's patent-pending Invisible Inset Hosel are an evolution from current club technology. The Company has worked with Chou Golf Design Labs, Inc. to develop the Tegra line of golf clubs. The Company's design moves or insets the shaft as close to the center of the club head as permitted under current USGA rules. As a result, the club head will rotate to the target faster than conventional designs, making it easier to square the club at impact and enabling the golfer to hit straighter and longer shots. This technology has been designed to be visibly distinct to the consumer at all times except while the club is being used. The Company's purpose in making the technology "invisible" to golfers while hitting the shot is to enhance the golfers ability to aim the club when addressing the ball. The Company believes that the Company's Invisible Inset Hosel technology could be as significant to the golf industry as perimeter weighting, graphite shafts or oversize metal woods. 32
SB-2/A35th Page of 84TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 35th
In addition, the Company designed the Tegra woods with a "bullet" shape in which the widest part of the club is the club's face or hitting area. This "bullet" shape contrasts with conventional club designs, in which the club head widens out from the face of the club resulting in the widest part of the club head being half an inch or more behind the face. The club's bullet shape provides a larger hitting area and sweet spot than would be achieved in a club having the same volume but a conventional design. An additional result of the bullet shape is that more weight in the club is distributed directly behind the hitting area than with conventional designs. Tegra irons incorporate the same patent-pending Invisible Inset Hosel technology as Tegra woods. The inset is as beneficial in Tegra irons as it is in Tegra woods. The Company believes that squaring the club to the target at impact makes Tegra iron shots more accurate than conventional designs. Tegra irons feature an oversize head design, with weighting around the perimeter and behind the sweet spot designed to maximize forgiveness on mis-hits and to provide a better feel on center hits, and the Invisible Inset Hosel which has been elevated to reduce club head twisting in longer grass. The Company presently manufactures Tegra men's right handed titanium woods and 17-4 stainless steel irons. The Company produces a full range of titanium drivers (6 DEG., 8 DEG., 9 DEG., 10 DEG. and 11 DEG.) and titanium fairway woods (#3, #5, #7 and #9) with graphite shafts and irons with options of steel or graphite shafts. Each shaft is available in various flexes to accommodate golfers of all ages and ability levels. The Company plans to introduce left-handed, ladies and seniors woods in the Spring of 1999. The Company has conducted player testing on its woods and irons and the Company believes such testing shows its Tegra technology promotes straighter and longer golf shots than other leading premium-priced golf clubs. "Iron Byron" testing (robotic testing designed to repeat identical swings so different clubs can be compared under controlled conditions) of Tegra woods has confirmed that the Tegra driver provides greater carry, roll and overall distance than certain leading premium-priced clubs while simultaneously increasing accuracy. Additional mechanical testing which has recently been recorded using high speed video shows that the Invisible Inset Hosel design produces a squarer club face at impact than other leading premium-priced clubs, resulting in straighter and longer shots. The Company's Invisible Inset Hosel technology is visibly distinct to the consumer except while the club is being used. In the golf industry, where many products look alike, some technological features are difficult to distinguish. Since many manufacturers make similar performance claims, consumers can become confused and have difficulty distinguishing products. The visibility of the technology is extremely important to identifying the product and communicating its benefits in a believable way and therefore adds to the Company's marketing effort. The Company believes that past performance of golf club sales shows that golf clubs which have had visibly distinct technology have seen far greater sales growth than equipment with new but non-visibly distinct technology. In 1967, Ping became a leader in the irons category when it introduced the first cavity backed (perimeter weighted) irons, a technology that was visibly distinct from other irons available at the time. In 1979, Taylor Made became a leader in the driver category when it introduced the first "metal wood" with an investment cast steel club head replacing the traditional persimmon wood head. In 1991, Callaway Golf became a leader in the driver category when it introduced the first oversized metal wood. Each of these products was not only an evolution of existing technology but its technology was visibly distinct to the consumer. As a more recent example, in 1994, Taylor Made introduced the Burner Bubble Shaft. This shaft incorporates a geometrical "bubble" highlighted with copper paint to emphasize its visible difference from conventional shafts. In the second quarter of 1995, Taylor Made's sales nearly tripled from 1994, achieving a 30% share of the premium driver market. The Company believes that a key factor to the success of these products is that the technology was visibly distinct to the consumer. The Company is currently sourcing all of its golf club components from contract manufacturing facilities. The Company's golf club heads are currently made in Asia by Fu Sheng Industrial Co., Ltd. and Zhong Shan Wei Sheng Sporting Goods Co., Ltd. True Temper Sports ("True Temper"), the world's largest 33
SB-2/A36th Page of 84TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 36th
shaft manufacturer, is currently producing the Company's steel and graphite shafts domestically. Golf Pride, a division of the Eaton Corporation, the world's largest grip manufacturer, produces the grips domestically. Joe Powell Golf, Inc. ("Powell"), one of the golf industry's leading golf equipment assembly companies, assembles the Tegra clubs domestically. The Company obtains these supplies by using individual purchase orders, rather than detailed open supply agreements. The Company spent approximately $451,019 in 1997 and $650,905 in 1996 in connection with research and development. APPAREL. In addition to golf clubs, the Company presently designs and manufacturers a line of men's apparel. The Tegra apparel range consists of men's shirts and outerwear which emphasize performance, comfort and style and are suitable for wear on or off the course. The Company expects that Tegra men's shirts will retail from $38-$54, while outerwear will retail from $80-$125 for a jacket and $225 for a rain-suit. The Company's apparel designs are intended to enhance the Tegra image of a technologically advanced and fashionable line of apparel. The Company's men's collection is divided into three groupings: solid color shirts, fashion shirts, and technical pieces (shirts, rainwear and other outerwear incorporating innovative fabrics, zippers, and other features). The foundation of the apparel collection is the Company's line of core solids. The Company's solids are produced from 97% cotton-3% spandex which fabric has the benefits of moveability and durability. Tegra's fashion collection incorporates Tegra's colors (red, black and white) to reinforce the Company's brand image. Technical pieces are constructed from innovative fabric combinations which include cotton and polyester microfiber materials to keep golfers cool and dry in the heat. These shirts are designed to accentuate the athleticism of the golfer and may include such details as zippered plackets, Johnny (i.e. V-neck) collars and reinforced sleeve and shoulder seams. Tegra outerwear is designed to perform in a variety of climatic conditions. A collection of technical fabrics such as Air-Tech-TM-, a waterproof-breathable nylon, and Micro Fleece, a brushed Polyester fabric which provides breathable insulation have been incorporated to help keep the golfer comfortable when playing in inclement weather. ACCESSORIES. The Company currently offers a variety of golf caps and full size staff bags. The Company plans to offer a full line of accessories, including bags, umbrellas, towels and caps. The Company anticipates offering a range of golf bags, including stand, light-weight carry and full size staff bags. The Company expects its golf bags, umbrellas, and towels to be available in March, 1999. See "Risk Factors -- Dependence on Product Introduction." MARKETING GENERAL. The Company's target consumer is the avid amateur golfer. To reach this consumer the Company is developing and installing TREs in golf shops throughout the country, creating a distinctive advertising campaign for the Tegra brand, attempting to obtain endorsements from touring professionals, such as Ian Woosnam, and pursuing other traditional forms of marketing. See "Risk Factors -- Dependence on Product Introduction." TEGRA RETAIL ENVIRONMENTS. The Company has adapted a marketing model used by marketers of many leading brands of consumer products who use in-store shops to increase sales and brand awareness. TREs are advanced retail selling systems designed to increase sales and brand awareness by selling Tegra golf clubs, apparel and accessories in a dedicated in-store area. Within the TRE the Company markets its Tegra golf clubs, apparel and accessories in an integrated, branded environment designed to convey the image of the Company as innovative in golf club technology and distinctive in design. The Company expects that TREs will promote Tegra products as visually distinctive and technologically advanced and will encourage customers to purchase the Company's accessories and apparel as well as its golf clubs. These types of in-store environments have been successfully used to promote many other products such as designer clothing and personal computers. 34
SB-2/A37th Page of 84TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 37th
TREs occupy from 50 to 150 square feet in specialty golf shops, and consist of flooring, fixtures, graphics and point-of-purchase materials. The TREs display Tegra clubs, clothing and apparel in a unified environment. The Company has developed proprietary fixtures which it uses to define the Tegra area within a store. These fixtures vary from a free standing display which can hold a complete set of irons and individual clubs, to a display which houses 18 woods, and a variety of apparel fixtures which display anywhere from 24 to 148 apparel pieces. A typical TRE is comprised of a wood and iron display as well as a clothing presentation. The Company's aim is to establish TREs in 1,000 off-course golf shops within three years. The Company has installed 58 TREs to date and expects to install up to 100 additional TREs by spring of 1999. The Company believes that a major point of differentiation from its competitors will be its emphasis on retail environments and in-store presentations. To the Company's knowledge, no other golf company is presently manufacturing clubs, bags, apparel and accessories and providing the retailer with fixturing to accommodate these items. See "Risk Factors -- Risk of Retailers' Refusal to Place or Maintain Tegra Retail Environments." ADVERTISING. The Company has completed a distinctive advertising campaign for the Tegra brand in an effort to create consumer awareness of and demand for Tegra products. The initial Tegra advertising campaign, entitled "Golf First," focused on the Company's visibly distinct technology, and was designed to build brand awareness and name recognition for Tegra and position the Tegra brand as the golf equipment choice for avid golfers. The Company intends to continue to use advertising to build an image for the Tegra brand and to separate itself from other golf companies. The Company believes the breadth of its product line, in particular its apparel line, should greatly enhance the Company's ability to create this image. The Company is presently developing a long format (30-minute) infomercial for Tegra drivers, which is expected to air in December. This broadcast advertising will be supplemented with a print campaign. The Company believes that several golf equipment companies have found long format infomercials to be extremely successful and profitable. The Company believes that the unique technological features incorporated in the Tegra driver and the visibility of these features give it the potential to be a successful direct marketed product. The Company plans to test market the infomercial on the Golf Channel and other cable sports channels. In addition, Peter Kessler, host of GOLF ACADEMY LIVE, wears Tegra clothing on the show. GOLF ACADEMY LIVE, which airs in prime time two nights per week, is one of the highest rated shows on the Golf Channel. ENDORSEMENTS Ian Woosnam. Mr. Woosnam began competing using Tegra clubs in October, 1997 and began endorsing Tegra products on January 1, 1998, although he does not yet have an endorsement contract. The Company is currently negotiating with Ian Woosnam to enter into an endorsement agreement for the Tegra brand. The Company expects to enter into a contract with Ian Woosnam pursuant to which he will continue to endorse Tegra products through December 31, 2006. Under the terms of the proposed agreement, Mr. Woosnam will endorse Tegra worldwide, wear Tegra clothing and headgear, play Tegra clubs and carry a Tegra bag and accessories. The Company also believes that Mr. Woosnam will agree to play a minimum of eight of his approximately 25 annual tournaments per year in the United States. Mr. Woosnam held a top ten Sony Ranking from the end of 1987 through the summer of 1994, and has over forty career victories world-wide, including the Master's Tournament in 1991 and is one of the top ranked golfers in Europe. Mr. Woosnam is a global personality as he annually plays in approximately 25 tournaments worldwide. Mr. Woosnam customarily plays in the four majors, including the three U.S. majors (the Masters, the U.S. Open and the PGA Championship) which traditionally receive the highest television viewership for golf tournaments. Mr. Woosnam's European Tour events can be seen in the U.S. on the Golf Channel. Additionally, the Company expects to secure publicity appearances and photo shoot days from Mr. Woosnam. The Company believes that Mr. Woosnam's visibility and extensive knowledge of golf will enhance the Company's brand identity and capabilities. 35
SB-2/A38th Page of 84TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 38th
Glen Day. Mr. Day, a U.S. PGA Tour member, has endorsed Tegra golf equipment, apparel and accessories worldwide since January 1998. Mr. Day currently endorses such products under a contract that will expire on December 31, 1998. As of September 14, 1998, Mr. Day was ranked in the top ten on the U.S. PGA Tour. Mr. Day has had six top ten finishes, including five top three finishes since beginning his association with Tegra. Mr. Day's endorsement contract with the Company expires on December 31, 1998. Other Professional Endorsers. The Company's products are currently being endorsed by PGA and Nike Tour professionals John Maginnes and Gene Sauers. Mr. Maginnes has been a professional golfer on the PGA and Nike Tours since 1994 and won the Nike Dakota Dunes Open in August, 1998. The Company and Mr. Maginnes have entered into a two-year contract for him to wear Tegra apparel on tour. Mr. Sauers has been a professional golfer for fourteen years and had two PGA Tour victories including the 1986 Bank of Boston Classic and the 1989 Hawaiian Open. Mr. Sauers won the Nike South Carolina Classic in May of this year. The Company anticipates that Mr. Sauers will enter into a two-year contract to wear Tegra apparel on tour. PERFORMANCE ACCOUNT PROGRAM. The Company intends to institute a Performance Account Program ("PAP") as part of its distribution strategy. The Company plans to grant each participant in the PAP program priority status for off-course retail distribution of Tegra products in a specific territory. The Company expects to require these selected retailers to purchase at least $250,000 of merchandise per year in each territory for which they are granted priority status. The Company also plans to require such retailers to install TREs in each of their retail locations. See "Risk Factors -- Risk of Retailers' Refusal to Place or Maintain Tegra Retail Environments." RETAIL PRICING. One of the Company's sales strategies is to deliver products which can achieve superior retail margin in order to incentivize retailers to sell more Tegra product. The Company estimates that retailers on average achieve 20% gross margin on sales from premium golf equipment. By pricing appropriately, the Company believes it will be able to offer retailers products that can achieve superior margin. The Company expects that, on average, Tegra golf clubs will allow retailers to achieve 40% gross margin, while Tegra apparel allow retailers to achieve in excess of 50% gross margin. CATALOGUE SALES. Tegra products are available in the Edwin Watts golf catalog, one of the country's leading golf catalogues. PATENTS Where appropriate, the Company seeks patent protection. The Company has filed patent applications covering various aspects of its TEGRA line of inset woods and irons. The Company filed a United States provisional patent application on December 31, 1996, entitled INSET HOSEL GOLF CLUB. The Company subsequently filed a full United States patent application and a Patent Cooperation Treaty patent application based on the United States provisional patent application, claiming priority as of the December 31, 1996 date. The Patent Cooperation Treaty Application designated all states. Based on the results of a patent search obtained by outside patent counsel, the Company is of the view that various aspects of the TEGRA line of woods and irons may be patentable. The patent applications include sixty-eight claims of varying scope and construction, including claims directed to golf clubs having an inset hosel wherein the fact that the hosel is inset and is hidden from the golfer, as well as claims directed to methods of making such a golf club. Other claims are directed to other features or combinations of features of the Tegra golf clubs. The Company has not received a substantive office action on the merits from the United States Patent and Trademark Office. The Company intends to seek further patents on its technology, if appropriate. However, there can be no assurance that patents will issue from any of the Company's pending or any future applications or that any claimed allowed from such applications will be of sufficient scope of strength, or be issued in all 36
SB-2/A39th Page of 84TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 39th
countries where the Company's products can be sold, to provide meaningful protection or any commercial advantage to the Company. See "Risk Factors--Intellectual Property." COMPETITION The Company competes with a number of established golf club manufacturers, many of which have greater financial and other resources than the Company. The Company's competitors include Callaway Golf Company, Adidas-Salomon AG (Taylor Made) and Fortune Brands, Inc. (Titleist and Cobra). The Company competes primarily on the basis of performance, brand name recognition, quality and price. The Company believes that its ability to establish its brand and market its products through its distributors is important to its ability to compete. See "Risk Factors -- Competition." The golf club industry is generally characterized by rapid and widespread imitation of popular technologies, designs and product concepts. The Company expects that one or more competitors may introduce products similar to its Tegra clubs. The buying decisions of many purchasers of golf clubs are often the result of highly subjective preferences which can be influenced by many factors, including, among others, advertising media, promotions and product endorsements. The Company may face competition from manufacturers introducing other new or innovative products or successfully promoting golf clubs that achieve market acceptance. The failure to compete successfully in the future could result in a material deterioration of customer loyalty and could have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, operating results or financial condition. See "Risk Factors -- Competition." In addition, the Company competes with a number of more well-established designers of golf apparel, including Nike, Reebok, Greg Norman, and Tommy Hilfiger. Because the Company competes primarily on the basis of brand name recognition, quality, comfort, and fashion considerations, the Company believes that its ability to establish its brand and market its apparel is important to its ability to compete. The subjective nature of apparel-buying decisions could result in a lack of acceptance in the market of the Company's apparel and accessories. Failure of the Company's current and planned apparel and accessories would adversely affect the Company's future growth and profitability. See "Risk Factors -- Competition." PROPERTIES The Company's corporate headquarters are located in a 2,650 square foot facility in Boca Raton, Florida. This facility accommodates the Company's corporate, administrative, marketing and sales personnel. The lease expires November 30, 1998. Additionally, the Company's apparel division is headquartered in a 2,250 square foot facility in New York, New York. The facility accommodates the Company's apparel design sourcing and quality assurance personnel. The Company is currently leasing this facility on a month-to-month basis. EMPLOYEES At September 21, 1998, the Company had 25 full-time employees, of whom 24 were involved in executive, managerial, supervisory and sales capacities, and one served in a clerical capacity. None of the Company's employees is covered by a collective bargaining agreement or is a member of a union. The Company considers its relationship with its employees to be good. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS The Company has received a letter from Tatsuya Saito requesting that the Company review its Tegra line of clubs in view of a patent issued to him on July 12, 1994 (the "Saito Patent"). The Saito Patent covers certain aspects of a club head and hosel, including the positioning of the hosel inset relative to the club head. The Company has referred this request to independent outside patent counsel. The Company does not believe that the Tegra line of clubs infringes any of the claims of the Saito Patent; however, there can 37
SB-2/A40th Page of 84TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 40th
be no assurance that a court will find that one or more of the Company's products does not infringe the Saito Patent, or any other patent. If Tatsuya Saito is successful in asserting its patent, it could require the Company to alter or withdraw existing products, delay or prevent the introduction of new products, or force the Company to pay damages if the products have been introduced. See "Risk Factors -- Litigation." The Company has received a letter from Vardon Golf Company, Inc. ("Vardon") asserting that the Company's Tegra woods and irons infringe one of the claims of its patent issued on April 12, 1994 (the "Vardon Patent"). The Vardon Patent includes claims directed to a number of aspects of a golf club head and hosel, including claims directed to an extended radius of gyration, which includes an aspect of the club head extending behind the hosel. Vardon filed a complaint in the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division, on May 13, 1998, in which Vardon alleges that six golf club manufacturers, including the Company, have manufactured, sold, offered to sell and distributed in the United States, specifically in the Northern District of Illinois, wood-type and iron golf clubs that are covered by at least one claim of the Vardon Patent and a related design patent. The Company does not believe that the Tegra line of clubs infringes any of the claims of these patents and the Company is in the process of preparing a response to the complaint; however, there can be no assurance that a court will find that the Company does not infringe one or the other of these patents, or both. If Vardon is successful in asserting its patent, it could require the Company to alter or withdraw existing products, delay or prevent the introduction of new products, or force the Company to pay damages if the products have been introduced. See "Risk Factors -- Litigation." The Company is the defendant in a lawsuit filed by TBWA Chiat/Day Inc. ("Chiat") in the Supreme Court of the State of New York on July 6, 1998 alleging breach of contract for advertising services and that certain fees and expenses in an amount of approximately $200,000 incurred by Chiat have not been paid by the Company. The Company has prepared and filed a response to this complaint, and the Company intends to assert its defences vigorously, however, there can be no assurance that the Company will prevail. See "Risk Factors -- Litigation." 38
SB-2/A41st Page of 84TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 41st
MANAGEMENT DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS The following table sets forth the names, ages and positions with the Company as of the date of this Prospectus of all of the officers and directors of the Company. Also set forth below is information as to the principal occupation and background for each person in the table. [Enlarge/Download Table] NAME AGE POSITION AND OFFICE ----------------------------------------------------- --- ----------------------------------------------------- Paul H. Berger....................................... 30 Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer Jim G. Dodrill II.................................... 32 President, General Counsel and Director Gary M. Treater...................................... 42 Executive Vice President Everette C. Hinson................................... 49 Vice President Finance Neal J. Cohen........................................ 41 Vice President Apparel Operations David K. Stern....................................... 34 Vice President Marketing James J. Henley...................................... 30 Apparel Design Director MR. BERGER co-founded the Company with Mr. Dodrill and has served as the Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the Company since the Company's inception. From 1994 to 1995, Mr. Berger was the Special Projects Manager for Designs, Inc. ("Designs"), of which his father is the Chairman of the Board. Mr. Berger assisted in repositioning Designs from a single brand apparel chain to a multi-brand operation and in the acquisition by Designs of Boston Trading Ltd., a high quality men's and women's apparel manufacturer. From 1993 to 1994, Mr. Berger served as an attorney with Designs. Mr. Berger is a graduate of the George Washington University and the University of Miami School of Law. Mr. Berger is licensed to practice law in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts and the State of Florida. MR. DODRILL co-founded the Company with Mr. Berger and has served as President, General Counsel and a director of the Company since the Company's inception. From 1993 to 1996, Mr. Dodrill was an associate at the law firm of Latham & Watkins, practicing in the corporate area with an emphasis on securities offerings, acquisitions, finance and general corporate representation. From 1988 to 1990, Mr. Dodrill worked for Davis Polk & Wardwell conducting research and coordinating administrative efforts regarding corporate reorganization and recapitalization transactions and mergers and acquisitions. Mr. Dodrill graduated from Brown University and the University of Miami School of Law, MAGNA CUM LAUDE. Mr. Dodrill is licensed to practice law in the State of New York. MR. TREATER has served as the Company's Executive Vice President since January, 1997, after having served as Vice President of Golf Operations for the Company from June 1996 through December 1996. From 1994 to 1996, Mr. Treater served as President of Gary Player Golf Equipment Inc., where he was responsible for relocating the company from South Africa to the U.S. and for development of the Player product line. From 1989 to 1994, Mr. Treater served as the General Manager of the Golf Club & Golf Products Divisions at the Ben Hogan Company. For the four years prior to that, Mr. Treater was the Senior Vice President at the National Golf Foundation. MR. HINSON has served as the Company's Vice President of Finance since May, 1997. From 1987 to 1997, Mr. Hinson served as Controller and Vice President of Finance, responsible for the accounting, treasury, credit, MIS and human resources departments, at Dunlop Maxfli Sports Corporation, a multi-division sporting goods manufacturer with annual sales in excess of $125 million. From 1980 to 1987, Mr. Hinson served as Corporate Controller and in various controllership and operations positions at Elscint, Inc., a manufacturer and distributor of medical diagnostic equipment with annual sales in excess of $100 million. MR. COHEN has served as the Company's Vice President of Apparel Operations since June 1996. From 1989 to 1996, Mr. Cohen was Vice President of Operations for Benetton Sportsystem Active, where he was 39
SB-2/A42nd Page of 84TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 42nd
responsible for managing the global sourcing of all brands, implementing final quality assurance auditing procedures and managing customer service, and traffic, warehousing and distribution of product. From 1980 to 1985 Mr. Cohen served as the Quality/Production Manager for Adidas U.S.A. MR. STERN has served as the Company's Vice President of Marketing since March, 1998. From 1997 to February, 1998, Mr. Stern served on the Company's Advisory Board. From 1997 to 1998, Mr. Stern served as Director of Marketing for Thermolase, a publicly traded company which owns and runs spa facilities across the U.S. From 1987 to 1997, Mr. Stern was Vice President of Marketing at Maddocks and Company. MR. HENLEY has served as the Company's Apparel Design Director since June 1996. From 1995 to June, 1996, Mr. Henley served as Apparel Designer for the Tommy Golf line at Tommy Hilfiger, Inc. From 1992 to 1994, Mr. Henley served as the designer for all product categories for Duck Head Apparel Co. The Company currently has two directors, Mr. Paul Berger and Mr. Jim Dodrill. The Company's Board of Directors is divided into three classes, with one class of directors elected each year at the annual meeting of stockholders for a three-year term of office. All directors of one class hold their positions until the annual meeting of stockholders at which the terms of directors in such class expire and until their respective successors are elected and qualified. Mr. Jim Dodrill serves in the class whose term expires in 1999; Mr. Paul Berger serves in the class whose term expires in 2000. The Company intends to appoint one of the individuals named below under the caption "New Directors" to serve in the class whose term expires in the year 2000 and the Company intends to appoint one of the individuals under the caption "New Directors" to serve in the class whose term expires in the year 2001. Executive officers of the Company are elected annually by the Board of Directors and serve at the discretion of the Board of Directors or until their successors are duly elected and qualified. None of the Company's executive officers has entered into an employment agreement with the Company. See "Risk Factors -- Lack of Experience of Management." NEW DIRECTORS The Company has agreed with the Representative that, promptly after the completion of this Offering, the Company will increase to five the number of individuals serving on the Company's Board of Directors, at least two of whom will be independent directors. The Company has also agreed that, for a period of five years following the completion of the Offering, it will use its best efforts to cause the election to its Board of Directors, one designee of the Representative. Set forth below are the names, ages and certain background information of the two individuals the Company intends to appoint to its Board of Directors, each of whom has agreed to serve. The Company anticipates that the new directors will also serve on the Audit Committee and the Compensation Committee. MR. HASKELL has agreed to serve on the Company's Board of Directors. Mr. Kim C. Haskell has over twenty-one years of media and marketing experience, including currently serving as Executive Vice President of Colby, Effler & Partners. MR. SNIDER has agreed to serve on the Company's Board of Directors. Mr. Michael Daniel Snider has been a professional golfer for twenty-five years and is currently the Head Golf Professional at Chenal Country Club. Mr. Snider's students include PGA, LPGA and Nike Tour players as well as amateur golfers of all skill levels. The third new director, to be nominated by the Representative, has not yet been appointed. COMPENSATION OF DIRECTORS The Company's directors will be reimbursed for any out-of-pocket expenses incurred by them for attendance at meetings of the Board of Directors or committees thereof. The Board of Directors intends 40
SB-2/A43rd Page of 84TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 43rd
to establish and form a Compensation Committee and Audit Committee upon completion of this Offering. The Board of Directors also intends to compensate Directors who are not employees of the Company $1,000 per month and to grant each Director who is not an employee of the Company options to purchase 12,000 shares of Common Stock each year, with a per share exercise price equal to the then fair market value of the Common Stock. ADVISORY BOARD Since the Company's formation, it has operated under the guidance of a Senior Advisory Board. The Senior Advisory Board serves as a resource for management and has no power or authority to direct the affairs of the Company. The following are members of that Board: STANLEY BERGER. Mr. Berger is Chairman of the Board of Directors of Designs, Inc., based in Needham, Massachusetts. Mr. Berger co-founded Designs in 1977. Under his leadership, the company has grown to be one of the largest global retailers of Levi Strauss & Co. products. Mr. Berger is the father of Paul Berger. STEVEN FIREMAN. Mr. Fireman served in the senior management of Reebok, Inc. for five years, including his last two years serving as President of Reebok's Casual Division (which included Reebok's Golf Division). At Reebok, Mr. Fireman launched the Greg Norman apparel line and Reebok's line of golf footwear. RIC JARRETT. Mr. Jarrett has twenty years of experience in the golf industry. As the former owner, President and Chief Executive Officer of Tiger Shark Golf, Inc., a multi-national golf equipment manufacturer, Mr. Jarrett has extensive experience in areas ranging from product design to creation of marketing and sales strategies. Mr. Jarrett is currently the President and Chief Executive Officer of Absolute Sports, Inc. DOUG RUDISCH. Mr. Rudisch is with Brookside Capital, a limited partnership formed by Bain Capital, Inc. to make strategic equity investments in public companies. Prior to joining Brookside, Mr. Rudisch was an associate at Bain Capital, where he was responsible for structuring, analyzing and executing private equity transactions and management buy outs. Prior to joining Bain Capital, Mr. Rudisch worked with the Boston Consulting Group, a strategic consulting firm. Mr. Rudisch graduated MAGNA CUM LAUDE from the Wharton School of Business. WILLIAM TAYLOR. Mr. Taylor was Vice President of Customer Relations at Levi Strauss & Co. Mr. Taylor was an executive at Levi Strauss for more than 20 years. Before joining Levi Strauss, Mr. Taylor was an Assistant Coach of the Dallas Cowboys. 41
SB-2/A44th Page of 84TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 44th
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION The following table sets forth all compensation received by the Company's Chief Executive Officer and each other executive officer whose total annual salary and bonus exceeded $100,000 during the fiscal year ended January 31, 1998 (collectively, the "Named Executive Officers"). SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE (FISCAL YEAR 1998) [Enlarge/Download Table] LONG-TERM COMPENSATION ANNUAL COMPENSATION AWARDS SECURITIES ----------------------- OTHER ANNUAL UNDERLYING OPTIONS NAME AND PRINCIPAL POSITION SALARY BONUS COMPENSATION (1) (2) ---------------------------------------------------- ---------- ----------- ----------------- --------------------- Paul H. Berger...................................... $ 125,000 -- $ 7,800 -- Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer James G. Dodrill II................................. 32,721 -- 7,800 (3) President, General Counsel and Director Gary M. Treater..................................... 153,912 -- 6,039 13,000 Executive Vice President Neal J. Cohen....................................... 135,600 -- 6,444 10,000 Vice President Apparel Operations Everette C. Hinson.................................. 77,263 -- -- 18,333 Vice President Finance James J. Henley..................................... 120,000 -- 5,400 7,000 Apparel Design Director -------------------------- (1) Other Annual Compensation consists of life insurance premiums paid by the Company on behalf of the Named Executive Officer. See "-- Benefit Plans -- MONY Plan." (2) See "Option Grants in Last Fiscal Year," below. (3) In March, 1998, Mr. Dodrill received options to purchase 166,666 shares of Class A Common Stock at $3.00 per share in lieu of approximately $95,000 of salary for 1997. BENEFIT PLANS STOCK OPTION PLANS. The 1996 Incentive and Non-Qualified Stock Option Plan (the "1996 Plan") was adopted by the Board of Directors and the shareholders. Under the 1996 Plan, 1,150,000 shares of Class A Common Stock have been reserved for issuance upon exercise of options designated as either (i) incentive stock options ("ISOs") under the Internal Revenue Code (the "Code"), or (ii) non-qualified options. ISOs may be granted under the 1996 Plan to employees and officers of the Company. Non-qualified options may be granted to consultants, directors and other persons who render services to the Company or any subsidiary corporation of the Company (whether or not they are employees). The 1998 Incentive and Non-Qualified Stock Option Plan (the "1998 Plan" and collectively with the 1996 Plan, the "Plans") was adopted by the Board of Directors and the shareholders of the Company in June, 1998. Under the 1998 Plan, 800,000 shares of Class A Common Stock have been reserved for issuance upon exercise of options designated as either (i) incentive stock options ("ISOs") under the Internal Revenue Code (the "Code"), or (ii) non-qualified options. ISOs may be granted under the 1998 Plan to employees and officers of the Company. Non-qualified options may be granted to consultants and other persons who render services to the Company or any subsidiary corporation of the Company (whether or not they are employees), and to all directors of the Company. The purpose of the Plans is to provide additional incentive to officers and other employees of the Company as well as other persons providing services to the Company by affording them an opportunity to acquire or increase their proprietary interest in the Company through the acquisition of shares of its Common Stock. The Board of Directors is responsible for administering the Plans. The 1998 Plan may also be administered by a committee consisting of at least two disinterested directors. The Board, within the 42
SB-2/A45th Page of 84TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 45th
limitations of the Plans, may determine the persons to whom options will be granted, the number of shares to be covered by each option, whether the options granted are intended to be ISOs, the duration and rate of exercise of each option, the option purchase price per share and the manner of exercise, the time, manner and form of payment upon exercise of an option, and whether restrictions such as repurchase rights by the Company are to be imposed on shares subject to options. ISOs granted under the Plans may not be granted at a price less than the fair market value of the Class A Common Stock on the date of grant (or 110% of fair market value in the case of persons holding 10% or more of the voting power of all classes of stock of the Company). The aggregate fair market value at the time of grant of shares for which ISOs granted to any person are exercisable for the first time by any person during any calendar year may not exceed $100,000. Options under the Plans may not be granted more than 10 years after its effective date. Options granted to date have seven (7) year terms. The term of each ISO granted under the Plans will expire not more than ten years from the date of grant (or five (5) years in the case of persons holding 10% or more of the voting power of all classes of stock of the Company). Options granted under the Plans are not transferable during an optionee's lifetime but are transferable at death by will or under the laws of descent and distribution. In addition to the options summarized below, a total of ISOs and non-qualified options to purchase 326,819 shares of Class A Common Stock have been granted to other employees and advisors of the Company. The following table sets forth as to each Named Executive Officer (a) the total number of shares subject to options granted during the fiscal year ended January 31, 1998, (b) exercise price of such options, (c) the percentage such grants represent of the total option grants to employees in the fiscal year ended January 31, 1998, and (d) the expiration date of such option grants. OPTION GRANTS IN LAST FISCAL YEAR [Enlarge/Download Table] NUMBER OF PERCENTAGE OF SHARES SUBJECT TOTAL OPTIONS TO EXERCISE GRANTED TO NAME OPTION GRANTS PRICE EMPLOYEES EXPIRATION DATE ----------------------------------------- ---------------- ------------- --------------- ---------------------- Gary Treater............................. 4,000 $ 6.00 .8% December 31, 2004 9,000 $ 6.00 1.8 January 30, 2005 Everette Hinson.......................... 8,333 $ 0.75 1.7 May 5, 2004 3,000 $ 6.00 .6 December 31, 2004 7,000 $ 6.00 1.4 January 30, 2005 Neal Cohen............................... 3,000 $ 6.00 .6 December 31, 2004 7,000 $ 6.00 1.4 January 30, 2005 James Henley............................. 5,000 $ 6.00 1.0 December 31, 2004 2,000 $ 6.00 .4 January 30, 2005 The following table sets forth certain information concerning the value of unexercised stock options held by the Named Executive officers. FISCAL YEAR-END OPTION VALUES [Enlarge/Download Table] NUMBER OF SECURITIES VALUE OF UNEXERCISED UNDERLYING UNEXERCISED IN-THE-MONEY OPTIONS AT JANUARY 31, OPTIONS AT JANUARY 31, 1998 1998 NAME EXERCISABLE UNEXERCISABLE EXERCISABLE UNEXERCISABLE ------------------------------------------------------- ----------- ------------- ----------- ------------- Gary Treater........................................... 11,554 28,334 $ 44,578 $ 116,579 Everette Hinson........................................ 3,000 15,333 $ 3,000 $ 59,081 Neal Cohen............................................. 6,193 14,917 $ 20,804 $ 53,343 James Henley........................................... 6,526 4,917 $ 12,336 $ 16,943 MONY PLAN. The MONY Plan is a flexible premium variable life insurance policy that the Company has provided as a benefit since August 15, 1996 to the following employees: Paul Berger, Jim Dodrill, Gary Treater, Neal Cohen and James Henley. In addition, the Company has provided this benefit to Everette Hinson since July 1, 1998. Pursuant to the MONY Plan, an individual (or his successors) may, subject to certain conditions, receive up to $500,000 at his death. In the alternative, the individual may choose to receive a lesser payment after a certain number of years in service, the amount of such payment to vary with length of service, among other factors. The Company pays monthly premiums ranging from $450 to $650 for the MONY Plan. The Company has the discretion to increase the benefit amounts provided to MONY Plan beneficiaries and to terminate the MONY Plan at will. 43
SB-2/A46th Page of 84TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 46th
PRINCIPAL AND SELLING SHAREHOLDERS The following table sets forth certain information with respect to the beneficial ownership of the Company's Common Stock immediately prior to this Offering, and as adjusted to reflect the sale of the shares of Class A Common Stock offered by the Company by (i) each person known by the Company to beneficially own more than five percent of the Common Stock, (ii) each director and the Company's Chief Executive Officer, (iii) all directors and executive officers of the Company as a group and (iv) each Selling Stockholder. Except as otherwise indicated, the address of each beneficial owner of five percent of such Common Stock is the same as the Company. See "Management." [Enlarge/Download Table] BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP IMMEDIATELY AFTER NAME AND ADDRESS OF PRIOR TO OFFERING SHARES OFFERING (1) BENEFICIAL OWNER 5% STOCKHOLDER OR SELLING ---------------------- BEING ---------------------- STOCKHOLDER NUMBER PERCENT OFFERED NUMBER PERCENT ---------------------------------------------------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- Paul Berger (2)..................................... 1,449,697 38.29% 125,000 1,449,697 28.89% Jim Dodrill (3)..................................... 521,343 13.77% 25,000 521,343 10.39% Synergy Group International, Inc. (4)............... 200,000 7.9% -- 200,000 3.98% 4725 East Sunrise Drive, Suite 228 Tucson, AZ 85718 All directors and executive officers of the Company as a group (7 persons) (5)........................ 2,011,563 53.11% -- 2,011,563 40.09% ------------------------ (1) Assumes that all Securities offered in this Offering are purchased but that the Underwriters' over-allotment option is not exercised. The first 100,000 shares of Class A Common Stock and 150,000 Warrants purchased pursuant to the exercise of such option, if any, would be acquired from the Company. The next 150,000 shares of Class A Common Stock purchased pursuant to the exercise of such option, if any, would be acquired from Messrs. Berger and Dodrill and the remaining shares of Class A Common Stock would be acquired from the other Selling Stockholders. (2) Includes 19,577 shares of Class A Common Stock issuable upon the exercise of options exercisable within 60 days of the date of this Prospectus. (3) Includes 336,510 shares of Class A Common Stock issuable upon the exercise of options exercisable within 60 days of the date of this Prospectus. (4) The principal beneficial owner of Synergy Group International, Inc. is Vincent J. Marold. (5) Includes 388,833 shares of Class A Common Stock issuable upon the exercise of options exercisable within 60 days of the date of this Prospectus. CONCURRENT REGISTRATION The following table sets forth certain information with respect to persons for whom the Company is registering Bridge Warrants for resale to the public. The Company will not receive any proceeds from the sale of such Bridge Warrants. The Bridge Warrants are not being underwritten by the Underwriters. [Enlarge/Download Table] WARRANTS PERCENTAGE WARRANTS OWNED OF WARRANTS OWNED BEFORE WARRANTS OFFERED AFTER OWNED NAME OFFERING HEREBY OFFERING AFTER OFFERING -------------------------------------------------- ------------- ---------------- ------------- -------------- John G. Costino................................... 212,500 212,500 0 0% Afzal Ahmad....................................... 150,000 150,000 0 0 Gary E. Markman................................... 125,000 125,000 0 0 James S. Mulholland, Jr........................... 125,000 125,000 0 0 David Hungerford.................................. 87,500 87,500 0 0 44
SB-2/A47th Page of 84TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 47th
[Enlarge/Download Table] WARRANTS PERCENTAGE WARRANTS OWNED OF WARRANTS OWNED BEFORE WARRANTS OFFERED AFTER OWNED NAME OFFERING HEREBY OFFERING AFTER OFFERING -------------------------------------------------- ------------- ---------------- ------------- -------------- Kal Zeff.......................................... 75,000 75,000 0 0% Martin C. Watz.................................... 75,000 75,000 0 0 Eugene D. Crittenden, Jr.......................... 50,000 50,000 0 0 Kelly Joseph Flynn................................ 50,000 50,000 0 0 Ronald Gagnon..................................... 50,000 50,000 0 0 Douglas H. Symons................................. 50,000 50,000 0 0 Robert Hurley..................................... 50,000 50,000 0 0 Dr. Riyaz Jinnah.................................. 37,500 37,500 0 0 Ronald J. Berk.................................... 25,000 25,000 0 0 Communication Enterprises, Inc.................... 25,000 25,000 0 0 Gilbert X. Dementis............................... 25,000 25,000 0 0 Richard Grant..................................... 25,000 25,000 0 0 Andrew A. Holder.................................. 25,000 25,000 0 0 Edward M. Kalinowski, Sr.......................... 25,000 25,000 0 0 L G Trust......................................... 25,000 25,000 0 0 Martin R. Lesh.................................... 25,000 25,000 0 0 Meca, Inc......................................... 25,000 25,000 0 0 Pafco General Insurance Co........................ 25,000 25,000 0 0 Joe Y. Pitts, Jr.................................. 25,000 25,000 0 0 Roy Roberts....................................... 25,000 25,000 0 0 Benjamin Russell.................................. 25,000 25,000 0 0 Kenneth J. Santiamo............................... 25,000 25,000 0 0 Superior Insurance Company........................ 25,000 25,000 0 0 Alex Theriot, Jr.................................. 25,000 25,000 0 0 Jane P. Trudeau................................... 25,000 25,000 0 0 Mark Wiener....................................... 25,000 25,000 0 0 Mike and Dana Eberts.............................. 15,000 15,000 0 0 Tyrone and Evelyn Adams........................... 12,500 12,500 0 0 Joel Benowitz..................................... 12,500 12,500 0 0 Milton Chwasky Retirement Trust................... 12,500 12,500 0 0 Jay L. Kobrin..................................... 12,500 12,500 0 0 Lee Harrison Corbin............................... 12,500 12,500 0 0 M. Jenkins Cromwell, Jr........................... 12,500 12,500 0 0 Nelson Garjian.................................... 12,500 12,500 0 0 Esther Golub...................................... 12,500 12,500 0 0 Integrated Capital Corp........................... 12,500 12,500 0 0 Paul J. Kuehn..................................... 12,500 12,500 0 0 H. Barry Robins................................... 12,500 12,500 0 0 Milan Tyburec..................................... 12,500 12,500 0 0 Total......................................... 1,752,500 1,752,500 ------------- ---------------- ------------- ---------------- There are no material relationships between any of the selling warrantholders and the Company. Each selling warrantholder has agreed to lock-up provisions pursuant to which the warrantholders have agreed not to sell any Bridge Warrants for a period of one year following the effective date of this Offering which lock up agreements cannot be terminated without the prior written consent of the Representative. Commencing one year from the effective date of this Offering, each selling warrantholder may sell without any lock-up restrictions. 45
SB-2/A48th Page of 84TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 48th
CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS AMENDMENT OF CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION On October 7, 1998, the Company amended its certificate of incorporation to create two classes of Common Stock (15,000,000 shares of Class A Common Stock and 5,000,000 shares of Class B Common Stock) (the "Amendment"). All shares of the Company's common equity outstanding prior to the Amendment were converted into shares of Class A Common Stock except for 1,464,953 shares of common equity owned by Messrs. Berger and Dodrill which were converted into Class B Common Stock. The Class A and Class B Common Stock have identical rights, including voting rights. Each share of Class B Common Stock will be automatically converted into a share of Class A Common Stock on the earlier to occur of (i) October 31, 2000 and (ii) such time as the closing price of the Class A Common Stock shall equal or exceed $8.00 for 10 consecutive trading days. See "Description of Securities -- Common Stock." RECENT LOAN AND CONSULTING AGREEMENT Since, July, 1998, the Company has consumed all cash on hand and has funded its operations with cash flow and loans from its officers aggregating $67,500 which are to be repaid with the proceeds of this offering. The Company is in the process of negotiating to obtain a loan of $250,000 from an individual. This may be personally guaranteed by Jim Dodrill and Paul Berger. The lender may also provide consulting services to the Company the terms of which are currently being negotiated. See "Use of Proceeds." TRANSACTIONS INVOLVING PAUL BERGER Between August 21, 1996 and January 23, 1998, Paul Berger, Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, made a number of advances to the Company. On August 21, 1996, Mr. Berger advanced $10,000 to the Company and received a note with a term of six years, earning 7.5% interest annually and an option to purchase 19,577 shares of the common stock of the Company at a price of $0.225 per share. In addition, Mr. Berger made four advances to the Company using proceeds from sales of his own stock to other individuals (some of whom were affiliates of the Company) at lower prices than contemporaneous sales of stock by the Company to third-party investors. On October 17, 1997, Mr. Berger advanced $50,000 to the Company after selling 100,000 shares of his stock to Synergy Group International, Inc. at the price of $0.50 per share. On October 28, 1997, Mr. Berger advanced $50,000 to the Company after selling 100,000 shares of his stock to Carol Dodrill, Jim Dodrill's mother, and Bill Powell at the price of $0.50 per share. On November 11, 1997, Mr. Berger advanced $2,500 to the Company after selling 3,333 shares of his stock to Rodger Berman at the price of $0.75 per share. On January 23, 1998, Mr. Berger advanced $50,000 to the Company after selling 50,000 shares of his stock to Andrew Holder and Marc Roberts at the price of $1.00 per share. These four transactions were contemporaneous with the Company's sale of its common stock at $2.10 per share. On July 31, 1998, Mr. Berger advanced $17,500 to the Company. Mr. Berger received notes from the Company for all five advances with an annual interest rate of 12.5%. All five notes, aggregating $170,000 plus interest, are to be repaid out of the proceeds of this Offering. See "Underwriting." TRANSACTIONS INVOLVING JIM DODRILL Between September 5, 1996 and January 23, 1998, Jim Dodrill, President and General Counsel of the Company, made a number of advances to the Company. On September 5, 1996, Mr. Dodrill advanced $30,000 to the Company and received a note with a term of six years, earning 7.5% interest annually and an option to purchase 58,731 shares of the common stock of the Company at a price of $0.225 per share. In addition, Mr. Dodrill made three advances to the Company using proceeds from sales of his own stock to other individuals at lower prices than contemporaneous sales of stock by the Company to third-party investors. On October 17, 1997, Mr. Dodrill advanced $50,000 to the Company after selling 100,000 shares of his stock to Synergy Group International, Inc. at the price of $0.50 per share. On November 11, 1997, 46
SB-2/A49th Page of 84TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 49th
Mr. Dodrill advanced $2,500 to the Company after selling 3,333 shares of his stock to Rodger Berman at the price of $0.75 per share. On January 23, 1998, Mr. Dodrill advanced $50,000 to the Company after selling 50,000 shares of his stock to Andrew Holder and Marc Roberts at the price of $1.00 per share. These three transactions were contemporaneous with the Company's sale of its Common Stock at $2.10 per share. Mr. Dodrill received notes from the Company for all three advances with an annual interest rate of 12.5%. All three notes, aggregating $102,500 plus interest, are to be repaid out of the proceeds of this Offering. See "Underwriting." TRANSACTIONS INVOLVING STANLEY BERGER Between August 13, 1996 and January 16, 1998, Stanley Berger, Paul Berger's father, made a number of advances to the Company. The following table summarizes the loans made. For each loan, Mr. Berger received a note with the loan amount and interest rate set forth in the table. In addition, for all but the two repaid loans and one loan on October 1, 1997, Mr. Berger also received a warrant to purchase the number of shares set forth in the table and at the exercise price set forth in the table. All of these notes, aggregating $510,000 plus interest, are to be repaid out of the proceeds of the Offering. See "Underwriting." [Enlarge/Download Table] NUMBER OF SHARES PURCHASABLE INTEREST UPON EXERCISE WARRANT DATE AMOUNT OF LOAN RATE OF WARRANT EXERCISE PRICE -------------------------------------------------------- --------------- ----------- ------------- --------------- August 13, 1996(1)...................................... $ 35,000 -- -- -- September 26, 1996...................................... $ 40,000 12.5% 4,400 $ 1.13 October 8, 1996......................................... $ 25,000 12.5% 2,750 $ 1.13 April 30, 1997.......................................... $ 25,000 12.5% 3,437 $ 0.75 May 27, 1997............................................ $ 50,000 15% 27,708 $ 0.75 June 19, 1997........................................... $ 50,000 15% 27,708 $ 0.75 July 3, 1997............................................ $ 30,000 12.5% 6,000 $ 2.10 July 10, 1997........................................... $ 15,000 12.5% 3,000 $ 2.10 August 27, 1997(1)...................................... $ 50,000 -- -- -- September 12, 1997...................................... $ 50,000 12.5% 8,333 $ 2.10 October 1, 1997(2)...................................... $ 25,000 12.5% -- -- October 14, 1997........................................ $ 50,000 12.5% 8,333 $ 2.10 November 14, 1997....................................... $ 50,000 12.5% 8,333 $ 2.10 November 28, 1997....................................... $ 30,000 12.5% 2,400 $ 2.10 December 3, 1997........................................ $ 20,000 12.5% 1,600 $ 2.10 January 16, 1998........................................ $ 50,000 12.5% 4,000 $ 4.00 Total............................................... $ 595,000 108,002 ------------------------ (1) This Note was repaid. (2) For this loan, Mr. Berger received a security interest in all of the Company's accounts receivable. 47
SB-2/A50th Page of 84TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 50th
DESCRIPTION OF SECURITIES The Company's authorized capital stock consists of 15,000,000 shares of Class A Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share, 5,000,000 shares of Class B Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share, and 5,000,000 shares of Preferred Stock, par value $0.01 per share. As of the date of this Prospectus, 1,051,818 shares of Class A Common Stock and 1,464,953 shares of Class B Common Stock were issued and outstanding. COMMON STOCK The holders of Class A and Class B Common Stock ("Common Stock") are entitled to one vote per share. The holders of Common Stock are entitled to receive ratably such dividends, if any, as may be declared by the Board of Directors out of legally available funds. Upon liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the Company, the holders of the Common Stock are entitled to share ratably in all assets of the Company which are legally available for distribution, after payment of or provisions for all debts and liabilities. Holders of Common Stock have no preemptive, subscription, or redemption rights. The shares of Common Stock offered hereby will be, when and if issued, fully paid and non-assessable. The Company has agreed that for a period of 24 months from the date of this Offering it will not sell or issue any securities (with certain limited exceptions) without the Representative's prior written consent. See "Risk Factors -- Representative's Influence Over Potential Future Capital Financing." The Company has agreed not to register the Class B Common Stock under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, for a period of two (2) years. The shares of Class B Common Stock will be automatically exchanged into shares of Class A Common Stock on a share for share basis (subject to adjustment upon the occurrence of certain events including a dividend distribution to the holders of Class A Common Stock, or a subdivision, combination or reclassification of the Class A Common Stock) after the earlier to occur of (i) October 31, 2000 and (ii) such time as the closing price for the Class A Common Stock shall equal or exceed $8.00 for a period of 10 consecutive trading days. PREFERRED STOCK The Board of Directors is authorized, subject to any limitations prescribed by law, without further stockholder approval, to issue from time to time up to an aggregate of 5,000,000 shares of Preferred Stock in one or more series. Each such series of Preferred Stock shall have such number of shares, designations, preferences, voting powers, qualifications and special or relative rights or privileges, which may include, among others, dividend rights, voting rights, redemption and sinking fund provisions, liquidation preferences and conversion rights, as shall be determined by the Board of Directors in a resolution or resolutions providing for the issuance of such series. Any such series of Preferred Stock, if so determined by the Board of Directors, may have full voting rights with the Common Stock or superior or limited voting rights, and may be convertible into Common Stock or another security of the Company. The Company has granted to the Board of Directors the authority to issue Preferred Stock and to determine its rights and preferences in order to eliminate delays associated with a stockholder vote on specific issuances. The issuance of Preferred Stock, while providing desirable flexibility in connection with possible acquisitions and other corporate purposes, could have the effect of making it more difficult for a third party to acquire, or of discouraging a third party from acquiring, a majority of the outstanding voting stock of the Company. The Company has no present plans to issue any shares of Preferred Stock. See "Description of Securities--Certain Effects of Authorized but Unissued Stock." The Company has agreed that for a period of 24 months from the date of this Offering it will not sell or issue any securities (with certain limited exceptions) without the Representative's prior written consent. See "Risk Factors -- Representative's Influence Over Potential Future Capital Financing." 48
SB-2/A51st Page of 84TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 51st
WARRANTS Each Warrant entitles the holder thereof to purchase one share of Class A Common Stock at a price per share of 115% of the initial public offering price per share of Class A Common Stock for a period of three years commencing on the effective date of this Offering. Each Warrant is redeemable by the Company at a redemption price of $0.125 per Warrant at any time, upon 30 days prior written notice to holders thereof, if the average closing bid price of the Class A Common Stock, as reported on the principal exchange on which the Class A Common Stock is traded, equals or exceeds 120% of the initial public offering price per share for 10 consecutive trading days ending on the day prior to the date of the notice of redemption. Pursuant to applicable federal and state securities laws, in the event a current prospectus is not available, the Warrants may not be exercised by the holders thereof and the Company will be precluded from redeeming the Warrants. There can be no assurance that the Company will not be prevented by financial or other considerations from maintaining a current prospectus. Any Warrant holder who does not exercise prior to the redemption date, as set forth in the Company's notice of redemption, will forfeit the right to purchase the Class A Common Stock underlying the Warrants, and after the redemption date or upon conclusion of the exercise period, any outstanding Warrants will become void and be of no further force or effect, unless extended by the Board of Directors of the Company. See "Underwriting" for the terms of the Warrants issuable pursuant to the Underwriters' Warrants. The number of shares of Class A Common Stock that may be purchased is subject to adjustment upon the occurrence of certain events, including a dividend distribution to the Company's shareholders or a subdivision, combination or reclassification of the outstanding shares of Class A Common Stock. Further, the Warrant exercise price is subject to adjustment in the event the Company issues additional stock or rights to acquire stock at a price per share that is less that the current market price per share of Class A Common Stock on the record date established for the issuance of additional stock or rights to acquire stock. The term "current market price" is defined as the average of the daily closing prices for the 20 consecutive trading days ending three days prior to the record date. However, the Warrant exercise price will not be adjusted in the case of the Underwriter's Warrants (or the Warrants included therein) or any other options or warrants outstanding as of the date of this Offering. The Warrant exercise price is also subject to adjustment in the event of a consolidation or merger where a distribution by the Company is made to its shareholders of the Company's assets or evidences of indebtedness (other cash or stock dividends) or pursuant to certain subscription rights or other rights to acquire Class A Common Stock. The Company may at any time, and from time to time, extend the exercise period of the Warrants, provided that written notice of such extension is given to the Warrant holders prior to the expiration date then in effect. Also, the Company may reduce the exercise price of the Warrants for limited periods or through the end of the exercise period if deemed appropriate by the Board of Directors. Any extension of the term and/or reduction of the exercise price of the Warrants will be subject to compliance with Rule 13e-4 under the Exchange Act including the filing of a Schedule 13E-4. Notice of any extension of the exercise period and/or reduction of the exercise price will be given to the Warrant holders. The Company does not presently contemplate any extension of the exercise period nor does it contemplate any reduction in the exercise price of the Warrants. The Warrants are also subject to price adjustment upon the occurrence of certain events including subdivisions or combinations of the Class A Common Stock. The Warrants will be issued pursuant to the terms and conditions of a Warrant Agreement between the Company and American Stock Transfer and Trust Company. DELAWARE LAW The Company is subject to the provisions of Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law. In general, the statute prohibits a publicly held Delaware corporation from engaging in a "business combination" with an "interested stockholder" for a period of three years after the date that the person 49
SB-2/A52nd Page of 84TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 52nd
became an interested stockholder is approved in a prescribed manner. Generally, a "business combination" includes a merger, asset or stock sale, or other transaction resulting in a financial benefit to the stockholder. Generally, an "interested stockholder" is a person who, together with affiliates and associates, owns (or within three years prior, did own) 15% or more of the corporation's voting stock. As a result of the foregoing provisions, the acquisition of the Company by means of a tender offer, a proxy contest or otherwise and the removal of incumbent officers and directors could be made more difficult. These provisions are expected to discourage certain types of coercive takeover practices and inadequate takeover bids and to encourage persons seeking to acquire control of the Company to negotiate with the Company first. The Company believes that the benefits of increased protection of the Company's potential ability to negotiate with the proponent of an unfriendly or unsolicited proposal to acquire or restructure the Company outweigh the disadvantages of discouraging such proposals because, among other things, negotiation of such proposals could result in an improvement of their terms. CERTAIN EFFECTS OF AUTHORIZED BUT UNISSUED STOCK The authorized but unissued shares of Common Stock and Preferred Stock are available for future issuance without shareholder approval. These additional shares may be utilized for a variety of corporate purposes, including future public offerings to raise additional capital, corporate acquisitions and employee benefit plans. The existence of authorized but unissued and unreserved Common Stock and Preferred Stock may enable the Board of Directors to issue shares to persons friendly to current management which could render more difficult or discourage an attempt to obtain control of the Company by means of a proxy contest, tender offer, merger, or otherwise, and thereby protect the continuity of the Company's management. The Company has agreed that for a period of 60 months from the date of this Offering it will not sell or issue any securities (with certain limited exceptions) without the Representative's prior written consent. See "Risk Factors -- Representative's Influence Over Potential Future Capital Financing." TRANSFER AGENT The Transfer Agent and Registrar for the Common Stock and the Warrants is American Stock Transfer and Trust Company. 50
SB-2/A53rd Page of 84TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 53rd
SHARES AVAILABLE FOR FUTURE SALE Upon completion of the Offering, the Company will have outstanding 3,551,818 shares of Class A Common Stock (3,651,818 shares of Class A Common Stock if the Underwriters' over-allotment option is exercised in full) and 1,464,953 shares of Class B Common Stock. All of the shares of Class A Common Stock offered hereby will be freely tradeable by persons other than "affiliates" of the Company without restriction or further registration under the Securities Act. Of the 3,551,818 shares of Class A Common Stock, 1,051,818 shares and 1,464,953 shares of Class B Common Stock (the "Restricted Shares") held by officers, directors, employees, consultants and other stockholders of the Company were sold by the Company in reliance on exemptions from the registration requirements of the Securities Act and are "restricted securities" within the meaning of Rule 144 promulgated under the Securities Act. Of the Restricted Shares of Class A Common Stock 463,903 will be eligible for resale in the public market as of the date of this Prospectus (the "Effective Date") in reliance on Rule 144 under the Securities Act. The one million Warrants for sale in this Offering will be immediately exercisable. Furthermore, in the event of a redemption of the Selling Warrantholders' Warrants by the Company, an additional 1.75 million Warrants will be immediately exercisable. The Warrants will be exercisable at a price per share of 115% of the initial public offering price of the Class A Common Stock and will be redeemable by the Company at a price per Warrant of $0.125 upon 30 days prior written notice to the holders thereof if the average closing price of the Class A Common Stock equals or exceeds 120% of the initial public offering price per share of the Class A Common Stock for ten consecutive trading days. If the Company redeems the Warrants before the Warrantholders exercise their right of purchase, then the Warrantholders will be entitled to receive only the redemption price, $0.125 per Warrant. Persons who are deemed affiliates of the Company are generally entitled under Rule 144 as currently in effect to sell within any three-month period a number of shares that does not exceed 1% of the number of shares of the Common Stock then outstanding or the average weekly trading volume of Common Stock during the four calendar weeks preceding the making of a filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Commission") with respect to such sale. Such sales under Rule 144 are also subject to certain manner of sale provisions and notice requirements and to the availability of current public information about the Company. The Company is unable to estimate accurately the number of shares of Common Stock that ultimately may be sold under Rule 144 because the number of shares will depend in part on the market price for the Common Stock, the personal circumstances of the sellers and other factors. In addition to the restrictions under Rule 144, the Company, the Representative and Messrs. Berger and Dodrill have entered into an agreement pursuant to which the Company has agreed not to register the Class B Common Stock for sale by either Mr. Berger or Mr. Dodrill. See "Underwriting." The shares of Class B Stock will be automatically exchanged into shares of Class A Common Stock on a share for share basis (subject to adjustment upon the occurrence of certain events including a dividend or distribution to the holders of Class A Common Stock, or a subdivision, combination or reclassification of the Class A Common Stock) after the earlier to occur of (i) October 31, 2000 and (ii) such time as the closing price for the Class A Common Stock shall equal or exceed $8.00 for a period of ten (10) consecutive trading days. See "Underwriting." 51
SB-2/A54th Page of 84TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 54th
UNDERWRITING Subject to the terms and conditions of the Underwriting Agreement, a copy of which is filed as an exhibit to the Registration Statement of which this Prospectus is a part, the Company has agreed to sell to the Underwriters, and the Underwriters, severally and not jointly, have agreed to purchase from the Company, on a "firm commitment" basis, if any are purchased, the number of shares of Class A Common Stock and Warrants (exclusive of shares of Class A Common Stock and Warrants issuable upon exercise of the Underwriters' over-allotment option) set forth opposite their respective names below: [Enlarge/Download Table] SHARES OF CLASS A UNDERWRITERS COMMON STOCK WARRANTS ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------- ---------- Argent Securities, Inc. 2,500,000 1,000,000 Total 2,500,000 1,000,000 The Company has agreed to sell the shares of Class A Common Stock and Warrants to the Underwriters at a discount of percent ( %) of the initial public offering price thereof. The Underwriters will offer the shares of Class A Common Stock and Warrants to the public at $ . per share of Class A Common Stock and $0.125 per Warrant as set forth on the cover page of this Prospectus and may allow to certain dealers who are National Association off Securities Dealers, Inc. ("NASD") members concessions not to exceed $ . per share of Class A Common Stock and $ . per Warrant, of which not in excess of $ . per share of Class A Common Stock and $ . per Warrant may be re-allowed to other dealers who are members of the NASD. After the initial public offering, the public offering price, concession and re-allowances may be changed by the Underwriters. Prior to this offering, there has not been any public market for the Class A Common Stock or the Warrants. The initial public offering prices of the shares of Class A Common Stock and the Warrants and the exercise price and other terms of the Warrants were determined by negotiations between the Company and the Representative and do not necessarily relate to the assets, book value or results of operations of the Company and the Representative and do not necessarily relate to the assets, book value or results of operations of the Company or any other established criteria of value. The Company has granted an option to the Underwriters, exercisable during the 45-day period from the date of this Prospectus, to purchase in the aggregate up to a maximum of 100,000 additional shares of Class A Common Stock and 150,000 Warrants and the Selling Stockholders have granted an option to the Underwriters to purchase 275,000 shares of Class A Common Stock, in each case at the prices set forth on the cover page of this Prospectus, minus the underwriting discount. The Underwriters have agreed to exercise in full the over-allotment option granted to them by the Company before exercising any of the over-allotment options granted to them by the Selling Stockholders and to exercise in full the over-allotment options granted to them by Messrs. Berger and Dodrill before exercising any of the over-allotment options granted to them by the other Selling Stockholders. The Underwriters' over-allotment option is exercisable upon the same terms and conditions as are applicable to the sale of the shares of Class A Common Stock and Warrants offered hereby. The Underwriting Agreement provides for reciprocal indemnification between the Company and the Underwriters against certain liabilities in connection with the Registration Statement, including liabilities under the Securities Act. Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act may be provided to officers, directors or persons controlling the Company, the Company has been informed that, in the opinion of the Commission, such indemnification is against public policy and is therefore unenforceable. 52
SB-2/A55th Page of 84TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 55th
The Company has agreed to pay certain blue sky legal fees of the Underwriters and to pay to the Underwriters at the closing of the Offering a non-accountable expense allowance of % of the aggregate offering price of the shares of Class A Common Stock and Warrants offered hereby (including any shares of Class A Common Stock and Warrants purchased purchasing pursuant to the Underwriters' over-allotment option). The Company has agreed to sell to the Representative or its respective designees, for an aggregate purchase price of $ , an option (the "Representative's Warrant") to purchase up to an aggregate of 250,000 shares of Class A Common Stock and 50,000 Warrants exercisable at 120% (providing for a purchase price per share at 120% of the initial public offering price of the Class A Common Stock underlying the Warrants) of the initial public offering price of the Securities. The Underwriters' Warrant shall be exercisable during a four-year period commencing one year after the effective date of the Registration Statement of which this Prospectus is a part. The Underwriters' Warrant may not be assigned, transferred, sold or hypothecated by the Underwriters until 12 months from the date of this Prospectus, except to officers or partners of the Underwriters, to a successor to the Underwriters, to a purchaser of substantially all of the assets of the Underwriters, or by operation of law. Any profits realized by the Underwriters upon the sale of the Class A Common Stock and Warrants (or the underlying Securities) issuable upon exercise of the Underwriters' Warrants may be deemed to be additional underwriting compensation. The exercise price of the Warrants issuable upon exercise of the Underwriters' Warrants during the period of exercisability shall be 115% of the initial public offering price of the Class A Common Stock per Warrant. The exercise of the Warrants subject to the Underwriters' Warrants and the number of shares of Class A Common Stock covered thereby are subject to adjustment in certain events to prevent dilution. For the life of the Underwriters' Warrant, the holders thereof are given, at a normal cost, the opportunity to profit from a rise in the market price of the Securities with a resulting dilution in the interest off other shareholders. The Company may find it more difficult to raise capital for its business if the need should arise while the Underwriters' Warrant is outstanding. At any time when the holders of the Underwriters' Warrant might be expected to exercise it, the Company would probably be able to obtain additional capital on more favorable terms. The Company has agreed with the Underwriters that the Company will pay to the Underwriters a warrant solicitation fee (the "Warrant Solicitation Fee") equal to 5% of the exercise price of the Warrants exercised beginning one year from the date of this Prospectus and to the extent not inconsistent with the guidelines of the NASD and the rules and regulations of the Commission (including NASD Notice to Members 81-38). Such Warrant Solicitation Fee will be paid to the Underwriters if (a) the market price of the Class A Common Stock on the date that any Warrant is exercised is greater than the exercise price of the Warrant; (b) the exercise of such warrant was solicited by the Underwriters; (c ) prior specific written approval for exercise is received from the customer if the Warrant is held in a discretionary account; (d) disclosure of this compensation agreement is made prior to or upon the exercise of such Warrant; (e) solicitation of the exercise is not in violation of Rule 103 of Regulation M of the Exchange Act; (f) the Underwriter provided bona fide services in exchange for the Warrant Solicitation Fee; and (g) the Underwriter has been specifically designated in writing by the holders of the Warrants as the broker. In addition, unless granted and exemption by the Commission from Rule 103 of Regulation M under the Exchange Act, the Underwriters will be prohibited from engaging in any market making activities or solicited brokerage activities with respect to the Securities for a specified period (generally five business days) prior to any solicitation of the exercise of any Warrant or prior to the exercise of any Warrant based on a prior solicitation until the later of the termination by waiver or otherwise) of any right the Underwriters may have to receive such a fee for the exercise of the Warrants following such solicitation. As a result, the Underwriters may be unable to continue to provide a market for the Securities during certain periods while the Warrants are exercisable. 53
SB-2/A56th Page of 84TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 56th
The Representative has informed the Company that the Underwriters do not intend to confirm sales of shares of Class A Common Stock or Warrants offered hereby to any accounts over which they exercise discretionary authority. The Underwriters have been given certain "piggyback" and demand registration right with respect to the Class A Common Stock underlying the Underwriters' Warrants for a period of four years commencing one year from the date of this Prospectus. The exercise of any such registration rights by the Underwriters may result in dilution to the interest of the Company's shareholders, hinder efforts by the Company to arrange future financing of the Company and/or have an adverse effect on the market price of the Securities. The Company has agreed that for a period of 24 months commencing from the date of this Prospectus, it will not issue or sell, directly or indirectly, any shares of its capital stock, or sell or grant options, warrants or rights to purchase any shares of its capital stock, without the written consent of the Representative, except for issuances pursuant to (i) the public offering of the Company's securities as described herein, (ii) the exercise of the Warrants and the Underwriters' Warrants, and the Class A Common Stock issuable thereunder, (iii) outstanding convertible securities or contractual obligations disclosed in this Prospectus, (iv) the grant of options and the issuance of shares issued upon exercise of options granted or to be granted under the Plan, and (v) an acquisition, merger or similar transaction provided that the acquirer of such capital stock does not receive, and will not be entitled to demand, registered securities during such 24-month period. See "Shares Available for Future Sale." The Company has agreed that, for a period of five years following the completion of this Offering, it will use its best efforts to cause the election too its Board of Directors one designee of the Representative, provided that such designee is reasonably acceptable to and approved by the Company. Alternatively, the Representative may appoint an observer to attend all meetings of the Board of Directors during such period. As of this date, no person has been identified by the Representative for election as a director or for appointment as a observer. LEGAL MATTERS The validity of the Class A Common Stock and Warrants being offered hereby will be passed upon for the Company by Foley, Hoag & Eliot LLP, Boston, Massachusetts. Certain matters are being passed upon for the Underwriters by Kutak Rock, Atlanta, Georgia. EXPERTS The financial statements as of January 31, 1998 and 1997 and for the year ended January 31, 1998 and the period February 8, 1996 (inception) to January 31, 1997 included in this Prospectus have been so included in reliance on the report of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, independent certified public accountants, given on the authority of said firm as experts in auditing and accounting. AVAILABLE INFORMATION The Company has filed with the Commission through the Electronic Data Gathering and Retrieval ("EDGAR") system a registration statement on Form SB-2 (together with all amendments, exhibits and schedules thereto, the "Registration Statement") under the Securities Act with respect to the Securities offered by this Prospectus. This Prospectus does not contain all of the information set forth in such Registration Statement, certain parts of which have been omitted in accordance with the rules and regulation of the Commission. Statements contained in this Prospectus as to the contents of any contract or other document referred to are not necessarily complete and in each instance reference is made to the copy of such contract or other document filed as an exhibit to the Registration Statement of which this Prospectus forms a part. For further information, reference is made to such registration statement, including the exhibits thereto, which may be inspected without charge at the Commission's principal office 54
SB-2/A57th Page of 84TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 57th
at 450 Fifth Street, N. W., Room 1024, Washington D. C. 20549; and at the following Regional Offices of the Commission, except that copies of the exhibits may not be available at certain of the Regional Offices: Chicago Regional Office, 500 West Madison Street, Suite 1400, Chicago, Illinois 60661; and New York Regional Office 7 World Trade Center, Suite 1300, New York, NY 10048. Copies of all or any part of such material may be obtained from the Commission at 450 Fifth Street, N. W. Room 1024, Washington, D.C. 20549, upon payment of certain fees prescribed by the Commission. The Commission maintains a World Wide Web site on the Internet at http://www.sec.gov that contains reports, proxy, information statements, and registration statements and other information filed with the Commission through the EDGAR system. The Company is not presently a reporting company and does not file reports or other information with the Commission. However, on the effective date of the Registration Statement, the Company will become a reporting company. Further, the Company will register its Common Stock and Warrants under the Exchange Act. Accordingly, the Company will become subject to the additional reporting requirements of the Exchange Act and in accordance therewith will file reports, proxy statements and other information with the Commission. In addition, after the completion of this Offering, the Company intends to furnish its shareholders with annual reports containing audited financial statements and such interim reports, in each case as it may determine to furnish or as may be required by law. 55
SB-2/A58th Page of 84TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 58th
OUTLOOK SPORTS TECHNOLOGY, INC. INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS [Enlarge/Download Table] Report of Independent Certified Public Accountants.................................... F-2 Balance Sheets at January 31, 1997, January 31, 1998 and July 31, 1998 (unaudited).... F-3 Statements of Operations for the period February 8, 1996 (inception) to January 31, 1997, for the year ended January 31, 1998 and for the six months ended July 31, 1997 and 1998 (unaudited)................................................................. F-4 Statement of Changes in Shareholders' Deficit......................................... F-5 Statements of Cash Flows for the period February 8, 1996 (inception) to January 31, 1997, for the year ended January 31, 1998 and for the six months ended July 31, 1997 and 1998 (unaudited)................................................................. F-6 Notes to Financial Statements, January 31, 1998....................................... F-7 F-1
SB-2/A59th Page of 84TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 59th
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of Outlook Sports Technology, Inc. In our opinion, the accompanying balance sheets and the related statements of operations, of changes in shareholders' deficit and of cash flows present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Outlook Sports Technology, Inc. (formerly Hippo, Inc.) at January 31, 1998 and 1997, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year ended January 31, 1998 and for the period February 8, 1996 (inception) to January 31, 1997, in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management; our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits of these statements in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards which require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for the opinion expressed above. The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 1 to the financial statements, the Company has suffered recurring losses and negative cash flows from operations through January 31, 1998, has a shareholders' deficit and working capital deficiency as of January 31, 1998, and is dependent on raising additional financing in order to fund its existing level of operations. These factors, among others, raise substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern. Management's plans in regard to these matters are also described in Note 1. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty. Price Waterhouse LLP Miami, Florida June 9, 1998 F-2
SB-2/A60th Page of 84TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 60th
OUTLOOK SPORTS TECHNOLOGY, INC. BALANCE SHEETS [Enlarge/Download Table] ASSETS JANUARY 31, ---------------------- JULY 31, 1997 1998 1998 ---------- ---------- ---------- (UNAUDITED) Cash................................................... $ 19,041 $ 1,367 $ 1,621 Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $35,000.................................. -- 167,700 279,108 Inventory.............................................. -- 417,058 527,296 Prepaid expenses....................................... -- 12,854 96,760 Debt issuance costs.................................... -- -- 194,688 Deposits and other current assets...................... 7,809 51,813 36,506 ---------- ---------- ---------- Total current assets............................... 26,850 650,792 1,135,979 ---------- ---------- ---------- Deferred expenses -- -- 93,750 Prepaid royalties...................................... 150,000 133,319 -- Property and equipment, net............................ 31,197 201,644 428,849 License................................................ 19,300 19,300 -- ---------- ---------- ---------- $ 227,347 $1,005,055 $1,658,578 ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' DEFICIT Current liabilities: Accounts payable..................................... $ 495,413 $1,962,657 $1,798,024 Accrued expenses..................................... 134,482 824,179 919,748 Advances from officers............................... 588,660 255,000 272,500 Notes payable, current portion....................... 115,000 2,665,638 5,825,000 ---------- ---------- ---------- Total current liabilities.......................... 1,333,555 5,707,474 8,815,272 Notes payable, long term............................... 40,000 40,000 40,000 ---------- ---------- ---------- 1,373,555 5,747,474 8,855,272 ---------- ---------- ---------- Commitments and contingencies.......................... -- -- -- ---------- ---------- ---------- Shareholders' deficit: Common stock; $.01 par value, 8,100,000 shares authorized; 1,118,488 and 2,324,071 shares issued and outstanding in 1997 and 1998, respectively, and 2,566,771 issued and 2,516,771 outstanding at July 31, 1998 (unaudited)............................... 11,185 23,241 25,668 Treasury stock; 50,000 shares (unaudited)............ -- -- (19,300) Additional paid in capital........................... 1,221,159 2,306,543 2,718,329 Accumulated deficit.................................. (2,378,552) (7,072,203) (9,921,391) ---------- ---------- ---------- Total shareholders' deficit........................ (1,146,208) (4,742,419) (7,196,694) ---------- ---------- ---------- $ 227,347 $1,005,055 $1,658,578 ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. F-3
SB-2/A61st Page of 84TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 61st
OUTLOOK SPORTS TECHNOLOGY, INC. STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS [Enlarge/Download Table] FOR THE PERIOD FEBRUARY 8, 1996 (INCEPTION) FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED TO YEAR ENDED JULY 31, JANUARY 31, JANUARY 31, ---------------------------- 1997 1998 1997 1998 ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- (UNAUDITED) Revenue.............................................. $ -- $ 741,120 $ 267,547 $ 440,474 ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- Operating expenses: Costs of sales..................................... -- 859,317 300,028 520,179 Research and development........................... 650,805 451,019 185,078 102,235 Stock-based compensation........................... 473,894 210,130 133,583 -- Selling, general and administrative expenses....... 1,251,009 3,669,657 1,294,715 2,755,609 ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- Total costs and expenses......................... 2,375,708 5,190,123 1,913,404 3,378,023 ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- Loss from operations................................. (2,375,708) (4,449,003) (1,645,857) (2,937,549) Interest expense..................................... (2,844) (244,648) (76,555) (325,636) Gain on sale of license.............................. -- -- -- 413,997 ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- Net loss............................................. $(2,378,552) $ (4,693,651) $ (1,722,412) $ (2,849,188) ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- Basic and diluted loss per share..................... $ (3.24) $ (2.21) $ (1.48) $ (1.17) ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- Weighted average common shares outstanding........... 734,330 2,120,460 1,162,539 2,425,197 ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. F-4
SB-2/A62nd Page of 84TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 62nd
OUTLOOK SPORTS TECHNOLOGY, INC. STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS' DEFICIT [Enlarge/Download Table] COMMON STOCK --------------------- ADDITIONAL TOTAL PAR TREASURY PAID IN ACCUMULATED SHAREHOLDERS' SHARES VALUE STOCK CAPITAL DEFICIT DEFICIT ---------- --------- ---------- ------------ ------------- ------------- Balance, February 8, 1996........ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- Issuance of common stock......... 1,068,488 10,685 -- 1,128,074 -- 1,138,759 Stock option compensation........ -- -- -- 73,785 -- 73,785 Acquisition of license........... 50,000 500 -- 19,300 -- 19,800 Net loss......................... -- -- -- -- (2,378,552) (2,378,552) ---------- --------- ---------- ------------ ------------- ------------- Balance, January 31, 1997........ 1,118,488 11,185 -- 1,221,159 (2,378,552) (1,146,208) Issuance of common stock......... 1,205,583 12,056 -- 932,218 -- 944,274 Stock option compensation........ -- -- -- 153,166 -- 153,166 Net loss......................... -- -- -- -- (4,693,651) (4,693,651) ---------- --------- ---------- ------------ ------------- ------------- Balance, January 31, 1998........ 2,324,071 23,241 -- 2,306,543 (7,072,203) (4,742,419) Issuance of common stock for payment of services (unaudited).................... 242,700 2,427 -- 411,786 -- 414,213 Treasury stock (unaudited)....... -- -- (19,300) -- -- (19,300) Net loss (unaudited)............. -- -- -- -- (2,849,188) (2,849,188) ---------- --------- ---------- ------------ ------------- ------------- Balance, July 31, 1998 (unaudited).................... 2,566,771 $ 25,668 $ (19,300) $ 2,718,329 $ (9,921,391) $(7,196,694) ---------- --------- ---------- ------------ ------------- ------------- ---------- --------- ---------- ------------ ------------- ------------- The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. F-5
SB-2/A63rd Page of 84TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 63rd
OUTLOOK SPORTS TECHNOLOGY, INC. STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS [Enlarge/Download Table] FOR THE PERIOD FEBRUARY 8, 1996 (INCEPTION) FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED TO YEAR ENDED JULY 31, JANUARY 31, JANUARY 31, ---------------------- 1997 1998 1997 1998 ------------- ----------- ---------- ---------- (UNAUDITED) Operating activities: Net loss........................................................ $(2,378,552) ($4,693,651) $(1,722,412) $(2,849,188) Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities: Depreciation................................................ 3,355 8,100 4,409 74,700 Stock-based compensation.................................... 473,894 210,130 133,583 -- Changes in operating assets and liabilities: Increase in accounts receivable........................... -- (167,700) (212,892) (111,408) Increase in inventory..................................... -- (417,058) (220,539) (110,238) Increase in prepaid expenses.............................. -- (12,854) (36,946) 14,731 Increase in deposits and other current assets............. (7,809) (44,004) (102,494) 34,607 (Increase) decrease in prepaid royalties.................. (150,000) 16,681 -- 133,319 Increase (decrease) in accounts payable and accrued expenses................................................ 629,895 2,156,941 221,585 152,762 ------------- ----------- ---------- ---------- Net cash used in operating activities............................. (1,429,217) (2,943,415) (1,935,706) (2,660,715) ------------- ----------- ---------- ---------- Investing activities: Capital expenditures............................................ (34,552) (178,547) (13,951) (301,905) ------------- ----------- ---------- ---------- Net cash used in investing activities............................. (34,552) (178,547) (13,951) (301,905) ------------- ----------- ---------- ---------- Financing activities: Proceeds from line of credit.................................... -- 35,000 35,000 -- Advances from officers.......................................... 588,660 255,000 3,000 17,500 Proceeds from issuance of unsecured notes payable............... 190,000 2,265,500 1,870,000 3,555,000 Debt issuance costs............................................. -- -- -- (194,688) Proceeds (payments) from (to) factor............................ -- 280,138 -- (280,138) Repayment of unsecured notes payable............................ (35,000) (30,000) -- (115,500) Proceeds from exercise of stock options and sale of common stock......................................................... 739,150 298,650 59,150 -- Acquisition of treasury stock................................... -- -- -- (19,300) ------------- ----------- ---------- ---------- Net cash provided by financing activities......................... 1,482,810 3,104,288 1,967,150 2,962,874 ------------- ----------- ---------- ---------- Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents.............. 19,041 (17,674) 18,493 254 ------------- ----------- ---------- ---------- Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period.................... -- 19,041 19,041 1,367 ------------- ----------- ---------- ---------- Cash and cash equivalents, end of period.......................... $ 19,041 $ 1,367 $ 36,534 $ 1,621 ------------- ----------- ---------- ---------- ------------- ----------- ---------- ---------- SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION Cash paid during the period for interest.......................... $ -- $ 1,868 $ -- $ 47,924 ------------- ----------- ---------- ---------- ------------- ----------- ---------- ---------- SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF NONCASH INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES: In June 1998, the Company issued 125,000 shares of its common stock to obtain financial and investment services through January 2000. Additionally, the Company issued in June 1998, 1,666 shares of its common stock to a vendor. These shares were valued by the Company's Board of Directors at $1.00 per share based on the fair market value of other common stock transactions during the particular time frame. (unaudited) In March 1998, the Company issued 104,784 shares of its common stock to a professional golfer as consideration for $220,047 owed to such golfer. Additionally, the Company issued in March, 1998 11,250 shares of its common stock valued at $67,500 in connection with endorsement contracts expiring in December 1998 (unaudited). During February 1997, the Company issued 1,024,800 shares of its common stock in exchange for the forgiveness of $588,660 of advances due to the Company's Chief Executive Officer. During 1996, the Company issued 50,000 shares of its common stock valued at approximately $19,800 in exchange for certain marketing rights. The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. F-6
SB-2/A64th Page of 84TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 64th
OUTLOOK SPORTS TECHNOLOGY, INC. NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS JANUARY 31, 1998 1. ORGANIZATION AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION Outlook Sports Technology, Inc. (the Company) was incorporated on February 8, 1996 in the State of Delaware. The Company is a designer and marketer and, through the use of contracted parties, a manufacturer of golf equipment, apparel and accessories under the TEGRA-TM- brand name. TEGRA-TM- golf clubs incorporate the Company's patent-pending Invisible Inset Hosel-TM-. The Company initially entered the U.S. golf market under a license agreement with Hippo Holdings, Ltd. ("Hippo Holdings"), a British golf equipment manufacturer and distributor. Under the terms of the licensing agreement, the Company acquired the rights, in perpetuity, to market and sell HiPPO-TM- brand products in the U.S. and Canada for 50,000 shares of the Company's common stock, and prepaid $150,000 of royalties. In May 1998, the Company sold this license back to Hippo Holdings. (See Note 9.) Since its inception in 1996 to January 31, 1998, the Company has incurred recurring losses, has not generated cash from its operating activities and is dependent on raising additional financing in order to fund its existing level of operations. Additionally, at January 31, 1998, the Company's current liabilities exceeded its current assets by approximately $5,057,000, and the Company had an accumulated deficit of approximately $4,742,000. These factors, among others, raise substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern. These financial statements do not reflect any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty. In connection with the above, the Company's management intends to execute an initial public offering under which the Company expects to sell shares of its common stock as well as warrants to acquire shares of common stock. Proceeds from the offering are expected to be used to repay the Company's outstanding notes payable (see Note 5) and fund inventory purchases and ongoing operations. There can be no assurance that such offering will be successful. If the offering is not successful, management will seek alternative financing. 2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES A summary of significant accounting policies followed by the Company in the preparation of the accompanying financial statements is presented below. ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES The preparation of financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from these estimates. UNAUDITED INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS The interim financial data of the Company is unaudited. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in the financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles have been condensed or omitted. In the opinion of management, the interim financial statements includes all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair statement of the results of the Company's operations for the interim periods presented. The results of operations for the six month period ended July 31, 1998 are not necessarily indicative of the results for the full year. F-7
SB-2/A65th Page of 84TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 65th
OUTLOOK SPORTS TECHNOLOGY, INC. NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) JANUARY 31, 1998 2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED) CASH The Company considers those short term, highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less as cash. INVENTORY Inventory, which is primarily comprised of clubs and component parts, is stated at the lower of cost or market with cost determined using the first-in, first-out (FIFO) method. Component parts consist primarily of golf club heads, shafts and grips. PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT Property and equipment are recorded at cost and depreciated using the straight line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets. Significant additions and improvements are capitalized and costs for maintenance and repairs are expensed as incurred. LICENSE The license to market HIPPO-TM- brand golf products in the U.S. and Canada is recorded at the estimated fair value of 50,000 shares issued in May 1996 as consideration for such license (see Note 9). LONG LIVED ASSETS The Company reviews long lived assets and identifiable intangibles for recoverability and reserves for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate, based on estimated future cash flows, the carrying amount of the assets will not be fully recoverable. REVENUE RECOGNITION Revenue from the sale of non consignment products is recognized at the time title to such products passes to the customer. Revenue from the sale of products delivered on consignment is recognized at the time such products are sold by the customer. RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT COSTS Research and development costs, which relate primarily to the design of the TEGRA-TM- brand name products, are expensed as incurred. ADVERTISING COSTS Advertising costs are expensed as incurred. Advertising expense consists of media advertising as well as brochure, production and direct mail costs. Advertising expense approximated $1,033,000 for the year ended January 31, 1998. F-8
SB-2/A66th Page of 84TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 66th
OUTLOOK SPORTS TECHNOLOGY, INC. NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) JANUARY 31, 1998 2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED) INCOME TAXES The Company records deferred income taxes using the liability method. Under the liability method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the expected future tax consequences of temporary differences between the financial statement and income tax bases of the Company's assets and liabilities. An allowance is recorded, based upon currently available information, when it is more likely than not that any or all of a deferred tax asset will not be realized. The provision for income taxes includes taxes currently payable, if any, plus the net change during the year in deferred tax assets and liabilities recorded by the Company. STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION The Company accounts for stock-based compensation to its employees using the intrinsic value method, which requires the recognition of compensation expense over the vesting period of the options when the exercise price of the stock option granted is less than the fair value of the underlying common stock. Additionally, the Company provides pro forma disclosure of net loss and loss per share as if the fair value method had been applied in measuring compensation expense for stock options granted. Stock-based compensation related to options granted to non-employees is recognized using the fair value method. LOSS PER SHARE The computation of loss per share of common stock is computed by dividing net loss for the period by the weighted average number of shares outstanding during that period. The weighted average number of shares outstanding for the period February 8, 1996 (inception) to January 31, 1997 and the year ended January 31, 1998 excludes approximately 274,000 and 1,179,000 respectively, of antidilutive stock options and warrants. Because the Company is incurring losses, the effect of stock options and warrants is antidilutive. Accordingly, the Company's presentation of diluted earnings per share is the same as that of basic earnings per share. Assuming the Company's contemplated public offering and the related payment of the unsecured notes payable to private investors had taken place on February 1, 1997, the Company would have net loss per share of $1.68 for the year ended January 31, 1998 and $0.78 for the unaudited period February 1, 1998, to July 31, 1998. Such supplemental net loss per share is based on the number of shares of common stock used in the calculation of net loss per share plus the number of shares required to be sold by the Company to fund the repayment of the unsecured notes payable after giving effect to the interest savings of approximately $237,000 and $300,000 for the periods ended January 31, 1998, and July 31, 1998, respectively. FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS The carrying value of the Company's financial instruments, including cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable, accrued expenses and notes payable approximated fair value because of the short maturity of these instruments. The Company routinely assesses the financial strength of its customers and records an allowance for doubtful accounts when it determines that collection of a particular amount is unlikely. F-9
SB-2/A67th Page of 84TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 67th
OUTLOOK SPORTS TECHNOLOGY, INC. NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) JANUARY 31, 1998 3. INVENTORY Inventory at January 31, 1998 consists of the following: [Download Table] Components parts.................................................. $ 126,340 Clubs............................................................. 278,715 Apparel, golf accessories and other............................... 12,003 --------- $ 417,058 --------- --------- At January 31, 1998, the Company had inventory of approximately $134,000 on consignment at various customer locations. The consigned inventory did not include any HIPPO-TM- brand products. 4. PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT Property and equipment consists of the following: [Enlarge/Download Table] JANUARY 31, ESTIMATED --------------------- USEFUL LIVES 1997 1998 (IN YEARS) --------- ---------- --------------- Furniture and fixtures................................... $ -- $ 169,215 3 Equipment................................................ 34,552 43,884 3 --------- ---------- 34,552 213,099 Accumulated depreciation................................. (3,355) (11,455) --------- ---------- $ 31,197 $ 201,644 --------- ---------- --------- ---------- The Company recorded depreciation expense related to its property and equipment of $3,355 and $8,100 for the period ended January 31, 1997 and the year ended January 31, 1998, respectively. F-10
SB-2/A68th Page of 84TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 68th
OUTLOOK SPORTS TECHNOLOGY, INC. NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) JANUARY 31, 1998 5. NOTES PAYABLE The Company's notes payable are as follows: [Enlarge/Download Table] JANUARY 31, -------------------------- 1997 1998 JULY 31, 1998 ----------- ------------- ------------- (UNAUDITED) Unsecured notes payable to private investors, due September 1998 (see below)............................................................... $ -- $ 50,000 $ 3,905,000 Unsecured notes payable to private investors, due September 1998, interest at 12.5%.................................................... 115,000 1,705,000 1,360,000 Unsecured notes payable to private investors, due September 1998, interest at 15%...................................................... -- 525,000 525,000 Unsecured notes payable to private investors, due September 1998, interest at 24%...................................................... -- 70,500 -- Unsecured line of credit, interest at the bank's prime rate plus 2% (10.5% at January 31, 1998), guaranteed by the Company's President and Chief Executive Officer, due on demand........................... -- 35,000 35,000 Long term unsecured notes payable to the Company's President and Chief Executive Officer, interest at 7.5%, due by September 2002........... 40,000 40,000 40,000 Advances from factor, interest at 24%, due on demand................... -- 280,138 -- ----------- ------------- ------------- 155,000 2,705,638 5,865,000 Current portion........................................................ (115,000) (2,665,638) (5,825,000) ----------- ------------- ------------- $ 40,000 $ 40,000 $ 40,000 ----------- ------------- ------------- ----------- ------------- ------------- In January 1998, as part of a proposed $3,500,000 debt offering, the Company issued a $50,000 note payable maturing at the earlier of September 1998 or within 5 days after an initial public offering of the Company's common stock generating in excess of $7 million of gross proceeds. Under the terms of the debt financing, the holder of the $50,000 note payable has the option to receive interest in the amount of $3,125 or warrants to purchase 25,000 shares of the Company's common stock at a price per share equal that to be offered in connection with the offering of warrants under the Company's planned initial public offering, which management expects to be 115% of the per share initial public offering price. Under the terms of the original issuance of 12.5% unsecured notes payable to private investors, the notes were due at the earlier of September 30, 1997, or an initial public offering of the Company's common stock. Additionally, the Company issued $275,000 of such notes during or subsequent to September 1997 which had a maturity of September 1998 or within 5 days of an initial public offering, if earlier. The 12.5% debt included 231,400 warrants to purchase the Company's common stock at prices ranging from $0.75 to $3.99 per share. Under the original terms of the 15% unsecured notes payable to private investors, the notes were due at the earlier of September 30, 1997, or an initial public offering of the Company's common stock. The terms of the debt included 232,750 warrants to purchase the Company's common stock at $0.75 per share. F-11
SB-2/A69th Page of 84TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 69th
OUTLOOK SPORTS TECHNOLOGY, INC. NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) JANUARY 31, 1998 5. NOTES PAYABLE (CONTINUED) At January 31, 1998, the Company was in default of the terms of the 12.5% and 15% unsecured notes payable to private investors which were due during September 1997. During February 1998, the Company obtained a specific waiver to extend the maturity of the then outstanding unsecured notes payable through the earlier of September 1998 or within 5 days after an initial public offering of the Company's common stock generating in excess of $7.5 million of gross proceeds. As a result of the extension of the maturity of the 15% and certain of the Company's 12.5% unsecured notes payable to September 1998, the Company issued to the holders of such unsecured notes, warrants to purchase 85,000 shares of the Company's common stock at $0.75 per share, warrants to purchase 98,333 shares of the Company's common stock at $3.00 per share and warrants to purchase 31,666 shares of the Company's common stock at $2.10 per share. The warrants were exercisable in full at the time of their issuance and expire on the dates of expiration of the warrants issued under the terms of the original debt. The Company's management believes that at the time of their issuance, the warrants issued in connection with the Company's unsecured notes payable had no value due to the financial condition of the Company as explained in Note 1. Accordingly, no portion of the proceeds from the issuance of the notes was allocated to the warrants nor was any value assigned to warrants issued in connection with the extension of the maturity of certain unsecured notes as described above. In February and May 1998 the Company repaid an aggregate of $68,500 and $47,000, respectively, of unsecured notes payable to private investors representing notes bearing interest at 12.5% and 24%. Pursuant to the terms of a factoring agreement, the Company assigns substantially all of its accounts receivable to a factor with recourse. The Company is able to borrow up to 50% of eligible accounts receivable, as defined, up to a maximum amount of $1 million. Advances from the factor bear interest at 24% per annum. Receivables assigned to the factor are subject to a charge of 3% of the face amount of the receivable. The advances from the factor are secured by all of the Company's assets. During the year ended January 31, 1998, the Company incurred interest and factoring charges of $10,059 and $7,739, respectively. The factoring agreement was for an initial term of six months and renews for successive twelve month periods thereafter, unless cancelled by the Company or the factor. At January 31, 1998, the Company had received advances of approximately $115,000 in excess of those permitted under the factoring agreement, resulting in the Company being in default of such agreement. As a result of the default, the factor had the right to terminate the agreement and demand payment of the funds advanced. Subsequent to year end, the Company has reduced the amounts outstanding under the factoring agreement and currently is within the borrowing base of such agreement. At January 31 and July 31, 1998, the Company had accrued interest under its unsecured notes payable in the aggregate amount of approximately $237,000 and 493,000, respectively. At January 31, 1998, $410,000 and $100,000 of the 12.5% and 15% unsecured notes payable, respectively, were held by a related party. Accrued interest and interest expense of approximately $34,000 and $31,000, respectively, was recorded in regards to these unsecured notes payable as of and for the year ended January 31, 1998. During the period February to June 1998, the Company obtained debt financing amounting to approximately $3.4 million (amounts outstanding at January 31, 1998 and July 31, 1998 were $50,000 and $3,905,000, respectively). This debt matures at the earlier of September 1998, or within 5 days of an initial F-12
SB-2/A70th Page of 84TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 70th
OUTLOOK SPORTS TECHNOLOGY, INC. NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) JANUARY 31, 1998 5. NOTES PAYABLE (CONTINUED) public offering of the Company's common stock generating in excess of $7 million of gross proceeds. Under the terms of the debt financing, each holder of a $50,000 note payable has the option to receive interest in the amount of $3,125 or warrants to purchase 25,000 shares of the Company's common stock at a price per share equal to that to be offered in connection with the offering of warrants under the Company's intended initial public offering, which management expects to be 115% of the per share initial public offering price. 6. SHAREHOLDERS' DEFICIT STOCK SPLITS AND NUMBER OF AUTHORIZED SHARES In August 1996, the Company increased the number of authorized shares of common stock from 250,000 to 6,500,000 and simultaneously effected a 15-for-1 stock split. In February 1997, the Company increased the number of authorized shares of common stock from 6,500,000 to 10,881,000 and simultaneously effected a 3-for-2 reverse stock split. In July 1997, the Company increased the number of authorized shares of common stock from 10,881,000 to 24,300,000. On January 31, 1998, the Company decreased the authorized shares of Common Stock to 8,100,000 and simultaneously effected a 3-for-1 reverse stock split. All references to the number of common shares and per share amounts elsewhere in the financial statements and related footnotes have been restated to reflect the effect of all stock splits for all periods presented. See Note 10. COMMON STOCK During February 1997, the Company's Chief Executive Officer was issued approximately 1,025,000 shares of the Company's common stock in return for the forgiveness of $588,660 in advances to the Company at various dates during 1996 and 1997. The Company recorded approximately $57,000 of compensation expense in connection with the issuance of such shares based on the fair market value of the shares as determined by an independent valuation. Also, during the year ended January 31, 1998, the Company sold approximately 181,000 shares of its common stock for $299,000, of which 4,833 shares were sold to a related party. In May 1996, the Company issued 50,000 shares of its common stock to Hippo Holdings in exchange for the perpetual rights to market and sell HiPPO-TM- brand products in the U.S. and Canada. These shares were valued by the Company's Board of Directors at $19,800, the estimated fair value, and their issuance recorded as an intangible asset in the accompanying balance sheets at January 31, 1997 and 1998 (see Note 9). At various dates during the period ended January 31, 1997, the Company's President and Chief Executive Officer purchased approximately 992,000 shares of the Company's common stock for $529,000. In connection with the sale of such shares to the Company's Chief Executive Officer, the Company recorded compensation expense of approximately $400,000 for the period ended January 31, 1997 based on fair market value of shares issued to other investors during the particular time frame. Additionally, during the period ended January 31, 1997, the Company issued, to third parties, approximately 77,000 shares of its common stock for $210,000. F-13
SB-2/A71st Page of 84TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 71st
OUTLOOK SPORTS TECHNOLOGY, INC. NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) JANUARY 31, 1998 6. SHAREHOLDERS' DEFICIT (CONTINUED) COMMON STOCK WARRANTS In connection with the issuance of its unsecured notes payable to private investors, the Company issued warrants to purchase shares of its common stock as follows: [Enlarge/Download Table] WEIGHTED AVERAGE EXERCISE WARRANTS PRICE --------- ----------- Warrants issued in connection with $65,000 of notes payable at 12.5%........................ 7,150 $ 1.13 --------- ----- BALANCE AT JANUARY 31, 1997................................................................. 7,150 1.13 Warrants issued in connection with $975,000 of notes payable at 12.5%....................... 107,250 0.75 Warrants issued in connection with $525,000 of notes payable at 15%......................... 232,750 0.75 Warrants issued in connection with $420,000 of notes payable at 12.5%....................... 84,000 2.10 Warrants issued in connection with other notes payable...................................... 33,000 2.33 --------- ----- BALANCE AT JANUARY 31, 1998................................................................. 464,150 $ 1.75 --------- ----- --------- ----- The Company believes, based on an independent valuation, that the above warrants had an insignificant fair market value at the time of their issuance. The above warrants do not include 25,000 warrants issuable at the election of a debt holder in connection with a $50,000 note payable issued by the Company in January 1998 (see Note 5). COMMON STOCK OPTIONS On September 4, 1996, the Company adopted an Incentive Stock Plan (the "Plan") allowing the Company to issue 500,000 incentive stock options to employees and non-qualified options to either employees or consultants. The total number of shares with respect to which options may be granted was increased to 1.1 million on January 24, 1997. F-14
SB-2/A72nd Page of 84TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 72nd
OUTLOOK SPORTS TECHNOLOGY, INC. NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) JANUARY 31, 1998 6. SHAREHOLDERS' DEFICIT (CONTINUED) The Company has issued various stock options to employees and consultants. The options' vesting period varies from full vesting upon issuance of options to vesting over a three year period. A summary of the Company's stock options activity is as follows: [Enlarge/Download Table] OPTIONS ---------------------- WEIGHTED AVERAGE EXERCISE SHARES PRICE --------- ----------- Balance, February 8, 1996................................................................... -- $ -- Granted..................................................................................... 267,531 0.82 --------- ----- Balance, January 31, 1997................................................................... 267,531 0.82 Granted..................................................................................... 448,880 3.04 --------- ----- Balance, January 31, 1998................................................................... 716,411 $ 2.21 --------- ----- --------- ----- [Enlarge/Download Table] WEIGHTED OUTSTANDING EXERCISABLE AVERAGE ----------- ----------- EXERCISE EXERCISE PRICE RANGE SHARES SHARES PRICE ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------- ----------- ----------- $0.225....................................................................... 85,476 85,476 $ 0.225 0.72-0.75................................................................... 169,161 125,204 $ 0.729 2.10-3.00................................................................... 384,068 286,624 $ 2.550 6.00........................................................................ 77,166 24,000 $ 6.000 ----------- ----------- 716,411 520,749 $ 2.210 ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- The Company generally grants options at exercise prices equal to the estimated market value of the Company's common stock at the date of the grant. The Company recognized approximately $74,000 and $153,000 of stock-based compensation expense during the periods ended January 31, 1997 and 1998, respectively, relating to options granted at exercise prices below the estimated fair market value of the Company's common stock at the date of grant. Had compensation costs for the Company's stock option grants to employees been determined using the fair value method, the Company's loss and loss per share for the year ended January 31, 1998 would not have been significantly different from the amounts recorded. Fair market value information for the Company's stock warrants and options for the period February 8, 1996 (inception) to January 31, 1997 and the year ended January 31, 1998 was estimated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model assuming risk free rates of 5.6% to 6.5%, no dividend yield, expected terms of 3 years, and no significant volatility. 7. INCOME TAXES The Company is subject to federal and state income taxes but has not incurred a liability for such taxes due to losses incurred. The Company had deferred tax assets of approximately $812,000 and $2,414,000 at January 31, 1997 and 1998, respectively, resulting primarily from net operating loss carryforwards. The deferred tax assets have been fully offset by a valuation allowance resulting from the uncertainty surrounding the future realization of the net operating loss carryforwards. These carryforwards are F-15
SB-2/A73rd Page of 84TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 73rd
OUTLOOK SPORTS TECHNOLOGY, INC. NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) JANUARY 31, 1998 7. INCOME TAXES (CONTINUED) available to offset future taxable income, if any, through 2013. Limitations on the utilization of the Company's net operating tax loss carryforwards could result in the event of certain changes in the Company's ownership. 8. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES The Company leases office space and equipment under noncancelable operating lease arrangements. Rent expense for the period February 8, 1996 (inception) to January 31, 1997 and for the year ended January 31, 1998 was approximately $46,000 and $101,000, respectively. Minimum future rental payments on non-cancelable operating leases with remaining lease terms of one or more years are as follows at January 31, 1998: [Download Table] JANUARY 31, 1999.............................................................. $ 93,883 2000.............................................................. 36,951 2001.............................................................. 3,953 2002.............................................................. 549 --------- Total minimum future rental payments.............................. $ 135,336 --------- --------- The Company has entered into an endorsement contract with a professional golfer for endorsement of the TEGRA-TM- brand. Under the terms of the contract, the professional golfer will wear TEGRA-TM- headwear and apparel, play TEGRA-TM- clubs and carry a TEGRA-TM- bag and accessories in professional competitions and in any golf related activities worldwide. Total minimum annual payments under the endorsement contract are as follows: [Download Table] JANUARY 31, 1999........................................................... $ 147,500 2000........................................................... 152,500 2001........................................................... 120,000 ---------- Total minimum future endorsement contract commitments.......... $ 420,000 ---------- ---------- The Company has commitments under employment and design consulting contracts expiring through November 1999. The terms of the present design consulting contract entered into in October 1996, as amended in April 1997, include a monthly retainer and royalty payments based on a percentage of cost of sales of the designed products. The designer also received 6,666 options at $0.75 per share which vest 3,333 each at December 31, 1997 and at December 31, 1998, upon final performance of the contract. In connection with these options, no amount was recorded as compensation expense as the Company's management believes these options had an insignificant fair market value at the time of issuance based on F-16
SB-2/A74th Page of 84TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 74th
OUTLOOK SPORTS TECHNOLOGY, INC. NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) JANUARY 31, 1998 8. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (CONTINUED) an independent appraisal. The Company is currently negotiating an extension of the design consulting contract. Total minimum annual payments under these contracts are as follows: [Download Table] JANUARY 31, 1999.............................................................. $ 192,500 2000.............................................................. 46,667 --------- Total minimum future employment and design consulting contract commitments..................................................... $ 239,167 --------- --------- The Company entered into an agreement with Hippo Holdings under which the Company was to pay a percentage of the endorsement fee paid by Hippo Holdings to a professional golfer. In connection therewith, the Company accrued approximately $220,000 during the year ended January 31, 1998. This agreement was terminated upon the sale back to Hippo Holdings of its license (see Note 9). As of January 31, 1998, the Company had entered into purchase agreements with various suppliers for components and finished goods for both TEGRA-TM- and HiPPO-TM- brand products, approximating $1.3 million (see Note 9). The Company is a defendant in a lawsuit alleging patent infringement and, additionally, has received a request that the Company review its TEGRA-TM- line of clubs in view of a patent issued to a third party relating to golf club design. The Company believes that its TEGRA-TM- brand golf clubs do not infringe the patents which are the subject of the lawsuit or the review request. However, no assurance can be given that the Company's product does not infringe such patents, or any other golf club related patent. Further, the Company cannot currently estimate the effect of an adverse decision in connection with these matters on the Company's financial condition or results of operations. See Note 10. 9. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS In March 1998, the Company issued 104,784 shares to a professional golfer as consideration for $220,047 owed to such golfer under the Company's endorsement arrangement with Hippo Holdings. The Company is currently negotiating an endorsement contract with this professional golfer for the Company's TEGRA-TM- brand products. In May 1998, the Company sold its license to sell HiPPO-TM- products in the U.S. back to Hippo Holdings along with all existing HiPPO-TM- brand inventory of approximately $62,000, prepaid royalties of approximately $133,000, and the assumption of liabilities in the amount of approximately $225,000. The Company received a cash payment of approximately $359,000. A gain of approximately $389,000 will be recorded in connection with this transaction. In addition, Hippo Holdings returned to the Company the 50,000 shares of common stock it had received upon entering the license agreement; no gain or loss will be recorded in connection with the return of the stock. Furthermore, Hippo Holdings assumed the Company's then outstanding purchase commitments in the amount of approximately $1,172,000 related to the HiPPO-TM- brand of products. Sales of HiPPO-TM- brand products for the year ended January 31, 1998, and the three months ended April 30, 1998, were approximately $589,000 and $24,000, respectively. On April 29, 1998, the Company entered into an agreement with a financial advisor to obtain financial investment services through January 22, 2000. The consideration provided for in the agreement was F-17
SB-2/A75th Page of 84TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 75th
OUTLOOK SPORTS TECHNOLOGY, INC. NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) JANUARY 31, 1998 9. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS (CONTINUED) 125,000 shares of the Company's Common Stock. The Company recorded $125,000 as a deferred charge to be amortized over the period of the agreement. See Note 10. 10. UNAUDITED SUBSEQUENT EVENTS In October 1998, the Company increased the authorized shares of common stock from 8,100,000 to 20,000,000. Within the authorized shares of common stock, the Company created a Class A and a Class B stock, consisting of 15,000,000 and 5,000,000 shares of stock, respectively. Additionally, the Company authorized 5,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value $0.01 per share. The Company is a defendant in a lawsuit alleging breach of contract for advertising services in an amount of approximately $200,000. The Company's management believes its defense to be meritorious; however, there can be no assurance that the Company will prevail. The Company received an additional payment of approximately $54,000 from Hippo Holdings in connection with the sale of the Company's license to produce HiPPO-TM- products. Accordingly, the gain on the sale was increased by approximately $25,000. F-18
SB-2/A76th Page of 84TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 76th
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- NO DEALER, SALESMAN OR ANY OTHER PERSON HAS BEEN AUTHORIZED TO GIVE ANY INFORMATION OR TO MAKE ANY REPRESENTATIONS NOT CONTAINED IN THIS PROSPECTUS AND, IF GIVEN OR MADE, SUCH INFORMATION OR REPRESENTATION MUST NOT BE RELIED UPON AS HAVING BEEN AUTHORIZED BY THE COMPANY OR THE UNDERWRITERS. NEITHER THE DELIVERY OF THIS PROSPECTUS NOR ANY SALE MADE HEREUNDER SHALL, UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES, CREATE ANY IMPLICATION THAT THE INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS CORRECT AS OF ANY DATE SUBSEQUENT TO THE DATE HEREOF OR THAT THERE HAS BEEN NO CHANGE IN THE AFFAIRS OF THE COMPANY SINCE THE DATE HEREOF. THIS PROSPECTUS DOES NOT CONSTITUTE AN OFFER TO SELL OR A SOLICITATION OF AN OFFER TO BUY BY ANY PERSON IN ANY JURISDICTION IN WHICH SUCH OFFER OR SOLICITATION IS NOT AUTHORIZED OR IN WHICH THE PERSON MAKING SUCH OFFER OR SOLICITATION IS NOT QUALIFIED TO DO SO OR TO ANYONE TO WHOM IT IS UNLAWFUL TO MAKE SUCH OFFER OR SOLICITATION IN SUCH JURISDICTION. ------------------------ TABLE OF CONTENTS [Download Table] PAGE --------- Prospectus Summary.............................. 4 Risk Factors.................................... 10 Use of Proceeds................................. 23 Dilution........................................ 24 Capitalization.................................. 25 Dividend Policy................................. 25 Selected Financial Data......................... 26 Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.................................... 27 Business........................................ 31 Management...................................... 39 Principal and Selling Shareholders.............. 44 Concurrent Registration......................... 44 Certain Transactions............................ 46 Description of Securities....................... 48 Shares Available for Future Sale................ 51 Underwriting.................................... 52 Legal Matters................................... 54 Experts......................................... 54 Available Information........................... 54 Index to Financial Statements................... F-1 ------------------------ UNTIL , 1998 (25 DAYS AFTER THE DATE OF THIS PROSPECTUS), ALL DEALERS EFFECTING TRANSACTIONS IN THE REGISTERED SECURITIES, WHETHER OR NOT PARTICIPATING IN THIS DISTRIBUTION, MAY BE REQUIRED TO DELIVER A PROSPECTUS. THIS IS IN ADDITION TO THE OBLIGATION OF DEALERS TO DELIVER A PROSPECTUS WHEN ACTING AS UNDERWRITERS AND WITH RESPECT TO THEIR UNSOLD ALLOTMENTS OR SUBSCRIPTIONS. 2,500,000 SHARES OF CLASS A COMMON STOCK AND 1,000,000 REDEEMABLE CLASS A COMMON STOCK PURCHASE WARRANTS OUTLOOK SPORTS TECHNOLOGY, INC. --------------------- PROSPECTUS --------------------- [LOGO] [LOGO] SECURITIES, INC. Atlanta, Georgia (404) 965-5353 (800) 840-8467 , 1998 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SB-2/A77th Page of 84TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 77th
PART II INFORMATION NOT REQUIRED IN PROSPECTUS ITEM 24: INDEMNIFICATION OF DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS. The Company's Certificate of Incorporation includes certain provisions permitted pursuant to the Delaware General Corporation Law ("Delaware Law") whereby officers and directors of the Company are to be indemnified against certain liabilities. The Certificate of Incorporation also limits to the fullest extent permitted by Delaware Law a director's liability to the Company or its stockholders for monetary damages for breach of fiduciary duty as a director, including gross negligence, except liability for (i) breach of the director's duty of loyalty, (ii) acts or omissions not in good faith or which involve intentional misconduct or a knowing violation of the law, (iii) the unlawful payment of a dividend or unlawful stock purchase or redemption, and (iv) any transaction from which the director derives an improper personal benefit. Delaware Law does not permit a corporation to eliminate a director's duty of care and this provision of the Company's Certificate of Incorporation has no effect on the availability of equitable remedies, such as injunction or rescission, based upon a director's beach of the duty of care. Article SEVENTH of the Company's Certificate of Incorporation, as amended (the "Certificate of Incorporation"), provides that no director of the Company shall be personally liable for any monetary damages for any breach of fiduciary duty as a director, except to the extent that the Delaware General Corporation Law prohibits the elimination or limitation of liability of directors for breach of fiduciary duty. Article EIGHTH of the Certificate of Incorporation provides that a director or officer of the Company shall be indemnified by the Company against (a) all expenses (including attorneys' fees), judgments, fines and amounts paid in settlement incurred in connection with any litigation or other legal proceeding (other than an action by or in the right of the Company) brought against him or her by virtue of his or her position as a director or officer of the Company if he or she acted in good faith and in a manner he or she reasonably believed to be in, or not opposed to, the best interests of the Company, and, with respect to any criminal action or proceeding, had no reasonable cause to believe his or her conduct was unlawful and (b) all expenses (including attorneys' fees) and amounts paid in settlement incurred in connection with any action by or in the right of the Company brought against him or her by virtue of his or her position as a director or officer of the Company if he or she acted in good faith and in a manner he or she reasonably believed to be in, or not opposed to, the best interests of the Company, except that no indemnification shall be made with respect to any matter as to which such person shall have been adjudged to be liable to the Company, unless a court determines that, despite such adjudication but in view of all of the circumstances, he or she is entitled to indemnification of such expenses. Notwithstanding the foregoing, to the extent that a director or officer has been successful, on the merits or otherwise, including the dismissal of an action without prejudice, he or she is required to be indemnified by the Company against all expenses (including attorneys' fees) incurred in connection therewith. Expenses shall be advanced to a director or officer at his or her request, provided that he or she undertakes to repay the amount advanced if it is ultimately determined that he or she is not entitled to indemnification for such expenses. Indemnification is required to be made unless the Company determines that the applicable standard of conduct required for indemnification has not been met. In the event of a determination by the Company that the director or officer did not meet the applicable standard of conduct required for indemnification, or if the Company fails to make an indemnification payment within sixty days after such payment is claimed by such person, such person is permitted to petition the court to make an independent determination as to whether such person is entitled to indemnification. As a condition precedent to the right of indemnification, the director or officer must give the Company notice of the action for which indemnity is sought and the Company has the right to participate in such action or assume the defense thereof. II-1
SB-2/A78th Page of 84TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 78th
Article EIGHTH of the Certificate of Incorporation further provides that the indemnification provided therein is not exclusive, and provides that in the event that the Delaware General Corporation Law is amended to expand the indemnification permitted to directors or officers the Company must indemnify those persons to the fullest extent permitted by such law as so amended. Section 145 of the Delaware General Corporation Law provides that a corporation has the power to indemnify a director, officer, employee or agent of the corporation and certain other persons serving at the request of the corporation in related capacities against amounts paid and expenses incurred in connection with an action or proceeding to which he or she is or is threatened to be made a party by reason of such position, if such person shall have acted in good faith and in a manner he or she reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to the best interests of the corporation, and, in any criminal proceeding, if such person had no reasonable cause to believe his or her conduct was unlawful; provided that, in the case of actions brought by or in the right of the corporation, no indemnification shall be made with respect to any matter as to which such person shall have been adjudged to be liable to the corporation unless and only to the extent that the adjudicating court determines that such indemnification is proper under the circumstances. The Company maintains a directors' and officers' insurance policy that covers certain liabilities of directors and officers of the Company. The Company maintains a general liability insurance policy that covers certain liabilities of directors and officers of the Company arising out of claims based on acts or omissions in their capacities as directors or officers. ITEM 25. OTHER EXPENSES OF ISSUANCE AND DISTRIBUTION. An itemized statement of expenses in connection with the issuance and distribution of the securities to be registered, other than underwriting discounts and commissions, appears below. All amounts are estimates, except for the SEC registration fee, the NASD filing fee and the NASDAQ SmallCap Market listing fee. [Enlarge/Download Table] SEC Registration Fee.............................................................. $ 13,677 NASD Filing Fee................................................................... 4,040 NASDAQ SmallCap Market Listing Fee................................................ 7,566 Blue Sky Qualification Fees and Expenses.......................................... 30,000 Accounting Fees and Expenses...................................................... 100,000 Legal Fees and Expenses........................................................... 250,000 Transfer Agent Fees............................................................... 6,000 Printing and Engraving Expenses................................................... 75,000 Miscellaneous Expenses............................................................ 13,717 --------- TOTAL............................................................................. $ 500,000 --------- --------- ITEM 26: RECENT SALES OF UNREGISTERED SECURITIES. On October 7, 1998, the Company amended its certificate of incorporation to create two classes of Common Stock. References to Common Stock below are to the Common Stock of the Company prior to this Amendment. The following information is furnished with regard to all securities sold by the Company within the past three years which were not registered under the Securities Act. The share numbers set forth below have been adjusted to reflect a number of stock splits. In August 1996, the Company increased the number of authorized shares of Common Stock from 250,000 to 6,500,000 and simultaneously effected a 15-for-1 stock split. In February 1997, the Company increased the number of authorized shares of Common Stock from 6,500,000 to 10,881,000 and simultaneously effected a 3-for-2 reverse stock split. In July 1997, the Company increased the number of authorized shares of Common Stock from 10,881,000 to 24,300,000. On II-2
SB-2/A79th Page of 84TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 79th
January 31, 1998, the Company decreased the number of authorized shares to 8,100,000 and simultaneously effected a 3-for-1 reverse stock split. The issuances described in this Item 26 were made in reliance upon the exemption from registration set forth in Section 4(2) of the Securities Act relating to sales by an issuer not involving any public offering. None of the foregoing transactions involved a distribution or public offering. ISSUANCES OF COMMON STOCK [Enlarge/Download Table] NAME NUMBER OF SHARES PURCHASE PRICE DATE SOLD ------------------------------------------------------- ----------------- -------------- ---------------------- Paul Berger............................................ 333,333 $ 132,000 May 13, 1996 117,630 95,000 June 21, 1996 207,690 170,000 August 19, 1996 1,024,800 588,660 February 27, 1997 Jim Dodrill............................................ 333,333 132,000 May 31, 1996 4,833 10,150 April 22, 1997 Greg Cohen............................................. 76,502 210,000 September 4, 1996 David Staudinger....................................... 6,666 14,000 July 25, 1997 Walter Maupay.......................................... 16,666 35,000 July 31, 1997 Walter & Gina McDonough................................ 3,333 7,000 August 1, 1997 DDJ Hackworthy Ltd Pp.................................. 47,619 100,000 August 11, 1997 David Stern............................................ 8,333 17,500 August 18, 1997 Ian Woosnam(1)......................................... 104,784 220,047 October 1, 1997 Synergy Group International(2)......................... 200,000 100,000 October 17, 1997 Carol Dodrill/Bill Powell(3)........................... 100,000 50,000 October 28, 1997 Paul Fairchild......................................... 33,333 70,000 October 30, 1997 Rodger Berman(2)....................................... 6,666 5,000 November 10, 1997 Frank Maddocks......................................... 60,000 45,000 November 11, 1997 Glen Day............................................... 10,000 (4) January 1, 1998 Dan Snider............................................. 1,250 (4) January 1, 1998 Arthur Chou............................................ 1,666 (4) January 1, 1998 Andrew Holder/Marc Roberts(2).......................... 100,000 100,000 January 23, 1998 Argent Securities, Inc................................. 125,000 (4) January 23, 1998 Total............................................ ------------------------ (1) Purchase price was paid by the individual forgoing payments due under a contract with Company in amounts equal to the purchase price. (2) These individuals purchased stock from Paul Berger and Jim Dodrill. (3) These individuals purchased stock from Paul Berger. (4) Issued in connection with a services contract. II-3
SB-2/A80th Page of 84TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 80th
DEBT SECURITIES AND WARRANTS From February, 1997 through July 1, 1998, the Company issued unregistered debt securities and warrants to a number of individuals pursuant to five private placements and to Stanley Berger in connection with certain advances to the Company. The issuances made in connection with these transactions were made in reliance on Section 4(2) of the Securities Act. In each case, each purchaser was an accredited investor. The following summary of these transactions reflects the effect of all stock splits of the Company's Common Stock. The summary also reflects a 25% increase in the number of shares of Common Stock that may be purchased by each investor in the offerings described under (a) and (b) below, which increase was granted by the Company in return for an extension of the payment date for each Note. (a) In February through April, 1997, the Company sold through a private placement a total of 9.75 Units (or portions of a Unit) to fourteen individuals, each Unit consisting of a non-transferable promissory note in the amount of $100,000, earning 12.5% interest annually, and a warrant to purchase 13,570 shares of the Common Stock of the Company. The warrants are convertible into shares of Common Stock at $0.75 per share and terminate after five years. (b) In May through June, 1997, the Company sold through a private placement a total of 10.5 Units (or portions of a Unit) to ten individuals (all of whom had participated in the first private placement), each Unit consisting of a non-transferable promissory note in the amount of $50,000, earning 15% interest annually, and a warrant to purchase 27,708 shares of the Common Stock of the Company. The warrants are convertible into shares of Common Stock at $0.75 per share and terminate after five years. (c) In July, 1997, the Company sold through a private placement a total of six Units (or portions of a Unit) to three individuals, each Unit consisting of a non-transferable promissory note in the amount of $75,000, earning 12.5% interest annually, and a warrant to purchase 15,000 shares of the Common Stock of the Company. The warrants are convertible into shares of Common Stock at $2.10 per share and terminate after five years. One investor in this offering received warrants to purchase an additional 98,333 shares of common stock at $3.00 per share, and one investor received warrants to purchase an additional 31,666 shares of common stock at $2.10 per share. (d) In January through June, 1998, the Company sold through a private placement a total of 70.1 Units (or portions of a Unit) to 43 individuals (four of whom had participated in the first private placement), each Unit consisting of a non-transferable promissory note in the amount of $50,000 and an option to receive an additional $3,125 in cash or a warrant to purchase 25,000 shares of the Common Stock of the Company. The warrants are convertible into shares of Common Stock at $6.90 per share and terminate after three years. The Company will register the warrants contemporaneously with registration of this Offering. Argent Securities, Inc. acted as placement agent in the private placement and received compensation of $499,150 consisting of a 10% commission and certain other fees. (e) On July 1, 1998, the Company sold through a private placement a total of one Unit to a single individual, which Unit consisted of a non-transferable promissory note in the amount of $400,000 and a warrant to purchase 533,333 shares of the Common Stock of the Company. The warrant is convertible into shares of Common Stock at $7.50 per share and terminates after three years. H.J. Meyers acted as placement agent in the private placement and received compensation of $40,000 consisting of a 10% commission. (f) In September, 1996 through January, 1998, the Company issued a total of ten non-transferable promissory notes, totaling $340,000 and warrants to purchase a total of 67,857 shares of the Common Stock of the Company. The warrants are convertible into shares of Common Stock at exercise prices ranging from $0.75 per share to $4.00 per share and terminate after five years. II-4
SB-2/A81st Page of 84TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 81st
ITEM 27: EXHIBITS [Enlarge/Download Table] 1.1 Form of Representative's Warrant 1.2 Form of Underwriting Agreement 3.1* Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company 3.2* By-Laws of the Company 4.1* Specimen certificate for the Common Stock of the Company 4.2* Specimen certificate for the Warrants of the Company 5.1** Opinion of Foley, Hoag & Eliot LLP 10.1* Employment Agreement with William Barthold, dated January 16, 1996 10.2* Employment Agreement with Daniel Snider, dated January 16, 1998 10.3* Business Note and Security Agreement, dated June 19, 1997, with Barnett Bank, N.A. 10.4* Revolving Accounts Receivable Funding Agreement between the Company and Gibraltar Financial Corporation, dated November 25, 1997 10.5* Amendment to Revolving Accounts Receivable Funding Agreement, dated November 25, 1997 10.6* Gibraltar Financial Corporation Demand Note, dated November 25, 1997 10.7* Form of Promissory Note signed by the Company in favor of Paul Berger, Jim Dodrill and Stanley Berger for all advances made by them to the Company 10.8* Security Agreement with Stanley Berger, dated October 1, 1997 10.9* Subordination Agreement with Stanley Berger, dated December 3, 1997 10.10* Option, dated January 24, 1997, received by Paul Berger as consideration for an advance made by him to the Company 10.11* Option, dated September 5, 1996, received by Jim Dodrill as consideration for an advance made by him to the Company 10.12* Form of Warrant for the purchase of the Common Stock of the Company received by Stanley Berger as consideration for advances made by him to the Company 10.13* Form of Promissory Note signed by the Company in favor of all participants in a private financing between February 4, 1997 and April 30, 1997 10.14* Form of Warrant for the purchase of the Common Stock of the Company received by all participants in a private financing between February 4, 1997 and April 30, 1997 10.15* Form of Promissory Note signed by the Company in favor of all participants in a private financing between May 12, 1997 and June 30, 1997 10.16* Form of Warrant for the purchase of the Common Stock of the Company received by all participants in a private financing between May 12, 1997 and June 30, 1997 10.17* Form of Promissory Note signed by the Company in favor of all participants in a private financing in July, 1997 10.18* Form of Warrant for the purchase of the Common Stock of the Company received by all participants in a private financing in July, 1997 10.19* Form of Consent to extension of payment date for all Notes executed by the Company in all private financings II-5
SB-2/A82nd Page of 84TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 82nd
[Enlarge/Download Table] 10.20* Form of Subscription Agreement signed by all investors in the Company 10.21* Lease Agreement, dated March 13, 1997, between the Company and Sanctuary of Boca, Inc. (for office space in Boca Raton) 10.22* Amendment to Lease #1, dated August 1, 1997, between the Company and Sanctuary of Boca, Inc. 10.23* Amendment to Lease #2, dated February 2, 1998, between the Company and Sanctuary of Boca, Inc. 10.24* Sublease Agreement and Rider, dated December 1, 1996, between the Company and Tom Rochon Associates (for office space in New York City) and Over-Lease Agreement incorporated therein 10.25* Sublease Agreement and Rider, dated July 12, 1996, between the Company and Tom Rochon Associates (for office space in New York City) and Over-Lease Agreement incorporated therein 10.26* Research, Development and Consulting Contract, dated October 8, 1996, with Chou Golf Design Labs, Inc. 10.27* Contract Amendment, dated May 4, 1997, to Research, Development and Consulting Contract with Chou Golf Design Labs, Inc. 10.28 Agreement, dated September 1, 1998, with G. Day Associates, Inc. 10.29* 1996 Incentive and Non-qualified Stock Option Plan 10.30* Form of Incentive Stock Option Agreement under 1996 Incentive and Non-qualified Stock Option Plan 10.31* Form of Non-qualified Stock Option Agreement under 1996 Incentive and Non-Qualified Stock Option Plan 10.32* 1998 Incentive and Non-qualified Stock Option Plan 10.33 Form of Incentive Stock Option Agreement under 1998 Incentive and Non-Qualified Stock Option Plan 10.34 Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement under 1998 Incentive and Non-Qualified Stock Option Plan 10.35* MONY Deferred Compensation Plan for managers of the Company 10.36* Settlement Agreement and Release, dated May 4, 1998, between the Company and Hippo Holdings Ltd 10.37 Consulting Agreement, dated April 29, 1998, between the Company and Argent Securities, Inc. 10.38 Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement for Outside Directors under 1998 Incentive and Non-Qualified Stock Option Plan 10.39 Termination Agreement, dated September 1, 1998, between the Company and Daniel Snider 10.40 Form of Warrant Agreement, dated , 1998, between the Company and American Stock Transfer & Trust Company 21.1* Subsidiaries of the Company 23.1 Consent of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP 23.2** Consent of Foley, Hoag & Eliot LLP (included in Exhibit 5.1) 24.1* Power of Attorney (contained on the signature page of this Registration Statement) II-6
SB-2/A83rd Page of 84TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 83rd
[Enlarge/Download Table] 27.1* Financial Data Schedule 99.1 Consent of Daniel Snider to being named in the Registration Statement as a new director, dated June 19, 1998 99.2 Consent of Kim Haskell to being named in the Registration Statement as a new director, dated June 23, 1998 ------------------------ * Previously filed. ** To be filed by amendment. ITEM 28. UNDERTAKINGS. The undersigned registrant hereby undertakes to provide to the underwriter at the closing specified in the underwriting agreements certificates in such denominations and registered in such names as required by the underwriters to permit prompt delivery to each purchaser. Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act of 1933 (the "Act") may be permitted to directors, officers and controlling persons of the small business issuer pursuant to the foregoing provisions, or otherwise, the small business issuer has been advised that in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange Commission such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Act and is, therefore, unenforceable. In the event that a claim for indemnification against such liabilities (other than the payment by the small business issuer of expenses incurred or paid by a director, officer or controlling person of the small business issuer in the successful defense of any action, suit or proceeding) is asserted by such director, officer or controlling person in connection with the securities being registered, the small business issuer will, unless in the opinion of its counsel the matter has been settled by controlling precedent, submit to a court of appropriate jurisdiction the question whether such indemnification by it is against public policy as expressed in the Act and will be governed by the final adjudication of such issue. (a) The undersigned registrant hereby undertakes to: (1) File, during any period in which it offers or sells, a post-effective amendment to this Registration Statement to: (i) Include any prospectus required by Section 10(a)(3) of the Securities Act; (ii) Reflect in the prospectus any facts or events which, individually or together, represent a fundamental change in the information in the registration statement; and (iii) Include any additional or changed material information on the plan of distribution. (2) For determining any liability under the Securities Act, treat each post-effective amendment as a new registration statement of the securities offered, and the offering of such securities at that time to be the initial bona fide offering. (3) File a post-effective amendment to remove from registration any of the securities that remain unsold at the termination of the offering. (4) For determining any liability under the Securities Act, treat the information omitted from the form of prospectus filed as part of this registration statement in reliance upon Rule 430A and contained in a form of prospectus filed by the small business issuer under Rule 424(b)(1) or (4) of 497(h) under the Securities Act as part of this registration statement as of the time the Commission declared it effective. (5) For determining any liability under the Securities Act, treat each post-effective amendment that contains a form of prospectus as a new registration statement for the securities offered in the registration statement, and that offering of the securities at that time as the initial bona fide offering of those securities. II-7
SB-2/ALast Page of 84TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 84th
SIGNATURES In accordance with the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, the registrant certifies that it has reasonable grounds to believe that it meets all of the requirements for filing on Form SB-2 and authorized this Registration Statement to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in the Town of Boca Raton, The State of Florida, on October 7, 1998. OUTLOOK SPORTS TECHNOLOGY, INC. By: /s/ PAUL H. BERGER ----------------------------------------- Paul H. Berger CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS By: /s/ JIM G. DODRILL II ----------------------------------------- Jim G. Dodrill II PRESIDENT By: /s/ EVERETTE C. HINSON ----------------------------------------- Everette C. Hinson VICE PRESIDENT FINANCE II-8

Dates Referenced Herein   and   Documents Incorporated by Reference

Referenced-On Page
This ‘SB-2/A’ Filing    Date First  Last      Other Filings
12/31/0683710KSB,  NT 10-K
1/30/0545
12/31/044510KSB,  NT 10-K
5/5/0445
10/31/0065310QSB
1/22/0074
1/31/99737410KSB,  NT 10-K
12/31/98873
11/30/9839NTN 10Q
10/15/981025
Filed on:10/8/981
10/7/98684
9/30/981031
9/21/9839
9/14/9838
9/1/9882
7/31/981169
7/7/981SB-2
7/6/981440
7/1/984580
6/23/9883
6/19/9883
6/9/981259
5/13/981440
5/4/98782
4/30/983474
4/29/987482
2/2/9882
2/1/9866
1/31/981179
1/23/984879
1/16/984981
1/1/98879
12/31/9773
12/3/974981
11/28/9749
11/25/9781
11/14/9749
11/11/974879
11/10/9779
10/30/9779
10/28/974879
10/17/974879
10/14/9749
10/1/974981
9/30/9768
9/12/9749
8/27/9749
8/18/9779
8/11/9779
8/1/977982
7/31/971179
7/25/9779
7/10/9749
7/3/9749
6/30/9781
6/19/974981
5/27/9749
5/12/9781
5/4/9782
4/30/974981
4/22/9779
3/13/9782
2/27/9779
2/4/9781
2/1/9766
1/31/971173
1/24/977181
12/31/9638
12/1/9682
10/8/964982
9/26/9649
9/5/964881
9/4/967179
8/21/9648
8/19/9679
8/15/9645
8/13/9649
7/12/9682
6/21/9679
5/31/9679
5/13/9679
2/8/961173
1/16/9681
7/12/941439
4/12/941440
 List all Filings 
Top
Filing Submission 0001047469-98-036781   –   Alternative Formats (Word / Rich Text, HTML, Plain Text, et al.)

Copyright © 2024 Fran Finnegan & Company LLC – All Rights Reserved.
AboutPrivacyRedactionsHelp — Sat., Apr. 27, 9:48:12.2am ET