SEC Info  
    Home      Search      My Interests      Help      Sign In      Please Sign In

North American Scientific Inc – ‘S-4/A’ on 3/12/04

On:  Friday, 3/12/04, at 6:11am ET   ·   Accession #:  1047469-4-7576   ·   File #:  333-110766

Previous ‘S-4’:  ‘S-4/A’ on 1/26/04   ·   Next & Latest:  ‘S-4/A’ on 3/23/04

Find Words in Filings emoji
 
  in    Show  and   Hints

  As Of                Filer                Filing    For·On·As Docs:Size              Issuer               Agent

 3/12/04  North American Scientific Inc     S-4/A                  8:2.2M                                   Merrill Corp/New/FA

Pre-Effective Amendment to Registration of Securities Issued in a Business-Combination Transaction   —   Form S-4
Filing Table of Contents

Document/Exhibit                   Description                      Pages   Size 

 1: S-4/A       Pre-Effective Amendment to Registration of          HTML   2.13M 
                          Securities Issued in a                                 
                          Business-Combination Transaction                       
 2: EX-8.1      Opinion re: Tax Matters                             HTML     13K 
 3: EX-10.28    Material Contract                                   HTML     75K 
 4: EX-10.29    Material Contract                                   HTML     26K 
 5: EX-23.1     Consent of Experts or Counsel                       HTML      8K 
 6: EX-23.2     Consent of Experts or Counsel                       HTML      8K 
 7: EX-99.1     Miscellaneous Exhibit                               HTML     15K 
 8: EX-99.2     Miscellaneous Exhibit                               HTML     13K 


S-4/A   —   Pre-Effective Amendment to Registration of Securities Issued in a Business-Combination Transaction
Document Table of Contents

Page (sequential) | (alphabetic) Top
 
11st Page   -   Filing Submission
"References to Additional Information
"Notice of Special Meeting of Stockholders
"Important
"Table of Contents
"Questions and Answers About the Merger
"Summary
"North American Scientific, Inc. (in thousands, except per share data)
"NOMOS Corporation (in thousands, except per share data)
"NASI Per Share Data
"NOMOS Per Share Data
"Combined Organization Pro Forma Per Share Data
"NOMOS Equivalent Pro Forma Per Share Data(4)
"Risk Factors
"Risks Relating to the Merger
"Cautionary Statement Concerning Forward-Looking Statements
"The Proposed Merger
"Information Regarding Nasi
"Information Regarding Am Capital I, Inc
"Information Regarding Nomos
"Opinions of Financial Advisors
"Interests of Certain Persons in the Merger
"The Merger Agreement
"Related Agreements
"Pro Forma Financial Data
"UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED COMBINED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET As of January 31, 2004 (in thousands)
"UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED COMBINED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS Fiscal Year Ended October 31, 2003 (in thousands, except per share data)
"UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED COMBINED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS Three Months Ended January 31, 2004 (in thousands, except per share data)
"Notes to Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Consolidated Financial Statements
"Information About the Special Meetings and Voting
"Comparison of Stockholder Rights and Corporate Governance Matters
"Description of Nasi Capital Stock
"Legal Matters
"Experts
"Additional Information for Stockholders
"Where You Can Find More Information
"Index to Financial Statements
"Report of Independent Auditors
"NOMOS Corporation Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements December 31, 2001, 2002, and 2003
"Annex A-1
"Agreement and Plan of Merger
"Article I the Merger
"Article Ii the Surviving Corporation
"Article Iii Effect of the Merger on Securities of Merger Sub and the Company
"Article Iv Representations and Warranties of Acquiror
"Article V Representations and Warranties of the Company
"Article Vi Conduct of Business Pending the Merger
"Article Vii Additional Agreements
"Article Viii Conditions
"Article Ix Termination; Fees and Expenses
"Article X Amendment and Waiver
"Article Xi Definitions
"Article Xii Indemnification
"Article Xiii General Provisions
"Annex A-2
"Recitals
"Second Amendment to Agreement and Plan of Merger
"Annex B
"Voting Agreement
"Exhibit A Company Shares Proxy
"Exhibit B Acquiror Shares Proxy
"Annex C
"Form of Voting Trust Agreement
"Exhibit A
"Voting Trust Certificate
"Annex D
"Form of Indemnification Escrow Agreement
"W I T N E S S E T H
"Annex A Stockholder List
"Annex B Escrow Agent Fees
"Annex E
"Annex F
"Form of Affiliate Letter
"Annex G
"Form of Lock-Up Agreement
"Annex H
"Annex I
"Annex J
"Section 262 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware
"Annex K
"Standstill Agreement
"Agreement
"Part Ii Information Not Required in the Prospectus
"Signatures
"QuickLinks

This is an HTML Document rendered as filed.  [ Alternative Formats ]




QuickLinks -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 12, 2004

Registration No. 333-110766



SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549


AMENDMENT
No. 2
to
FORM S-4
REGISTRATION STATEMENT
Under
THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933


NORTH AMERICAN SCIENTIFIC, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware
(State or Other Jurisdiction of
Incorporation or Organization)
  2835
(Primary Standard Industrial
Classification Code Number)
  51-0366422
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification Number)

20200 Sunburst Street
Chatsworth, California 91311
(818) 734-8600

(Address, Including Zip Code, and Telephone Number, Including
Area Code, of Registrant's Principal Executive Offices)

L. Michael Cutrer
President and Chief Executive Officer
20200 Sunburst Street
Chatsworth, California 91311
(818) 734-8600
(Name, Address, Including Zip Code, and Telephone Number,
Including Area Code, of Agent for Service)



Copies to:
Mark Mihanovic, Esq.
McDermott, Will & Emery
2049 Century Park East, Suite 3400
Los Angeles, California 90067
Phone: (310) 277-4110
Fax: (310) 277-4730
  Mark Baseman, Esq.
Cohen & Grigsby, P.C.
11 Stanwix Street, 15th Floor
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15222
Phone: (412) 297-4900
Fax: (412) 297-0672

Approximate date of commencement of proposed sale to the public: As soon as practicable after the effectiveness of this Registration Statement and the effective time of the merger of NOMOS Corporation with and into AM Capital I, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of the Registrant, as described in the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of October 26, 2003, as amended, included as Annex A-1, Annex A-2 and Annex A-3 to the joint proxy statement/prospectus forming a part of this Registration Statement.


        If the securities being registered on this form are being offered in connection with the formation of a holding company and are in compliance with General Instruction G, check the following box.    o

        If this form is filed to register additional securities for an offering pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering.    o                

        If this form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(d) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration for the same offering.    o                


        THE REGISTRANT HEREBY AMENDS THIS REGISTRATION STATEMENT ON SUCH DATE OR DATES AS MAY BE NECESSARY TO DELAY ITS EFFECTIVE DATE UNTIL THE REGISTRANT SHALL FILE A FURTHER AMENDMENT WHICH SPECIFICALLY STATES THAT THIS REGISTRATION STATEMENT SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 8(a) OF THE SECURITIES ACT OR UNTIL THIS REGISTRATION STATEMENT SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE ON SUCH DATE AS THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, ACTING PURSUANT TO SECTION 8(a), MAY DETERMINE.




The information in this joint proxy statement/prospectus is not complete and may be changed. These securities may not be sold until the registration statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission of which this joint proxy statement/prospectus is a part is effective. This joint proxy statement/prospectus is not an offer to sell these securities and it is not soliciting an offer to buy these securities in any jurisdiction where the offer or sale is not permitted. This joint proxy statement/prospectus does not constitute a solicitation of a proxy in any jurisdiction in which it is unlawful to make such proxy solicitation.

Subject to Completion, Dated March 12, 2004

LOGO   LOGO

MERGER PROPOSAL—YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT

        The boards of directors of North American Scientific, Inc. (NASI) and NOMOS Corporation (NOMOS) unanimously have approved a merger designed to continue NASI's and NOMOS' growth and leadership in the field of radiation therapy. We believe the combined company will be able to create more stockholder value than could be achieved by either company individually.

        If the merger is consummated, NOMOS stockholders will receive, subject to certain escrow arrangements for indemnification obligations, 0.891 shares of NASI common stock for each share of NOMOS common stock they hold, approximately 1.212 shares of NASI common stock for each share of NOMOS series A preferred stock they hold, 0.603 shares of NASI common stock and $2.15 per share in cash for each share of NOMOS series B preferred stock they hold, and 0.340 shares of NASI common stock and $5.99 per share in cash for each share of NOMOS series C preferred stock they hold, plus, in each case cash, in lieu of fractional shares. NASI stockholders will continue to own their existing NASI shares. Pursuant to the merger, NOMOS will merge with and into AM Capital I, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of NASI formed for the purpose of effecting the merger. AM Capital I, Inc. will be the surviving corporation in the merger and will change its name immediately following the merger to "NOMOS Corporation". The shares of the combined company will be traded on the Nasdaq National Market under the symbol "NASI".

        We are asking NASI stockholders to approve the merger agreement, the proposed merger and the issuance of the shares of NASI common stock in connection with the merger and two amendments to the Amended and Restated 1996 Stock Option Plan, one of which would to permit the issuance of replacement options in connection with a merger or consolidation and, and the other of which would to increase the maximum number of shares available for issuance under the plan from 4,000,000 to 4,600,000 shares. NASI's special meeting will be held on:

Monday, May 3, 2004

10:00 a.m.

at the following location:

Warner Center Marriott Hotel
21850 Oxnard Street
Woodland Hills, California 91367

        The board of directors of NOMOS is asking NOMOS stockholders to approve the merger agreement and the proposed merger. NOMOS' special meeting will be held on:

Monday, May 3, 2004

10:00 a.m.

at the following location:

Cohen & Grigsby, P.C.
11 Stanwix Street, 15th Floor
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15222

        We are enthusiastic about the merger and the strength and capabilities of the combined company. We join our respective boards of directors in recommending that you vote in favor of the proposals to be presented at our respective company's special meetings.

        We encourage you to read carefully this joint proxy statement/prospectus, including the section entitled "Risk Factors" beginning on page 21, before voting your shares.

L. Michael Cutrer
President and Chief Executive Officer
North American Scientific, Inc.
  John W. Manzetti
President and Chief Executive Officer
NOMOS Corporation

        Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state securities commission has approved or disapproved of the merger or the securities to be issued in the merger or determined if this joint proxy statement/prospectus is accurate or complete. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.

        This joint proxy statement/prospectus is dated March     , 2004 and is first being mailed to the stockholders of NASI and NOMOS on or about March     , 2004.



REFERENCES TO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

        This joint proxy statement/prospectus incorporates important business and financial information about NASI from other documents that are not included in or delivered with this joint proxy statement/prospectus. This information is available to you without charge upon your request. You can obtain the documents incorporated by reference in this joint proxy statement/prospectus by requesting them in writing or by telephone from NASI at the following address and telephone number:

North American Scientific, Inc.
20200 Sunburst Street
Sunburst, California 91311
(818) 734-8600
Attention: Investor Relations

        If you would like to request documents, NASI must receive your request by April 23, 2004 (which is at least five business days before the date of the special meetings) in order for you to receive them before your special meeting.

        See "Where You Can Find More Information" beginning on page 178.


LOGO


NOTICE OF SPECIAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

        To All Stockholders of North American Scientific, Inc.:

        NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that North American Scientific, Inc. (NASI) will hold a special meeting of its stockholders on Monday, May 3, 2004, 10:00 a.m., local time, at the Warner Center Marriott Hotel, 21850 Oxnard Street, Woodland Hills, California 91367 for the following purposes:

        Holders of record of NASI common stock at the close of business on March 10, 2004, the record date, are entitled to receive this notice and to vote their shares at the special meeting or any adjournment or postponement of that meeting. As of the record date, there were 10,353,807 shares of NASI common stock outstanding. Each share of NASI common stock is entitled to one vote on each matter properly brought before the special meeting.

        You should contact the Secretary of NASI at NASI's corporate offices located at 20200 Sunburst Street, Chatsworth, California 91311 if you wish to review the list of stockholders.

        After careful consideration, NASI's board of directors unanimously has determined that the merger is advisable, fair to and in the best interests of NASI and its stockholders and unanimously has approved each of the following:


        NASI's board of directors unanimously recommends that you vote to approve each of NASI's proposals listed above, all of which are described in detail in the accompanying joint proxy statement/prospectus.

    By Order of the Board of Directors,

 

 

LOGO
    L. Michael Cutrer
President and Chief Executive Officer

March     , 2004
Chatsworth, California

 

 


IMPORTANT

        Your vote is important. Even if you plan to attend the special meeting, please vote by completing and mailing the enclosed proxy card as promptly as possible in the enclosed postage-paid envelope.

        If your shares are held in the name of a bank, broker or other fiduciary, please follow the instructions on the voting instruction card furnished by the record holder. REMEMBER, YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT, SO PLEASE ACT TODAY.


LOGO


NOTICE OF SPECIAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

        To All Stockholders of NOMOS Corporation:

        NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that NOMOS Corporation (NOMOS) will hold a special meeting of its stockholders on Monday, May 3, 2004, 10:00 a.m., local time, at the offices of Cohen & Grigsby, P.C., 11 Stanwix Street, 15th Floor, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15222 for the following purposes:

        Holders of record of NOMOS common stock and preferred stock at the close of business on March 10, 2004, the record date, are entitled to receive this notice and to vote their shares at the special meeting or any adjournment or postponement of that meeting. As of the record date, there were 3,632,777 shares of NOMOS common stock outstanding, 374,748 shares of series A preferred stock outstanding, 1,861,908 shares of series B preferred stock outstanding, and 1,336,152 shares of series C preferred stock outstanding. Each share of NOMOS' common stock, series B preferred stock and series C preferred stock is entitled to one vote at the special meeting. Each share of series A preferred stock is entitled to approximately 1.3605 votes at the special meeting. The chairman of the board of directors of NOMOS, John A. Friede, has agreed to vote certain shares beneficially owned by him, representing approximately 41% of the voting power of the NOMOS common stock and preferred stock voting together on an as-converted-to-common stock basis outstanding as of the record date, in favor of the proposal to approve the merger agreement, the proposed merger and the other transactions contemplated by the merger agreement.

        If the merger is consummated, NOMOS stockholders will receive, subject to certain escrow arrangements for indemnification obligations, 0.891 shares of NASI common stock for each share of NOMOS common stock they hold, approximately 1.212 shares of NASI common stock for each share of NOMOS series A preferred stock they hold, 0.603 shares of NASI common stock and $2.15 per share in cash for each share of NOMOS series B preferred stock they hold, and 0.340 shares of NASI common stock and $5.99 per share in cash for each share of NOMOS series C preferred stock they hold, plus in each case cash in lieu of fractional shares.

        After careful consideration, NOMOS' board of directors unanimously has determined that the merger is advisable, fair to and in the best interests of NOMOS and its stockholders and unanimously has adopted and approved the merger agreement, the proposed merger and the other transactions contemplated by the merger agreement. NOMOS' board of directors unanimously recommends that you vote to approve the merger agreement, the proposed merger and the other transactions



contemplated by the merger agreement and each of the other proposals listed above, all of which are described in detail in the accompanying joint proxy statement/prospectus.

    By Order of the Board of Directors,

 

 

LOGO
    John W. Manzetti
President and Chief Executive Officer

March     , 2004
Cranberry Township, Pennsylvania

 

 


IMPORTANT

        Your vote is important. Even if you plan to attend the special meeting, please complete and mail to NOMOS at the address provided the enclosed proxy card. If your shares are held in the name of a bank, broker or other fiduciary, please follow the instructions on the voting instruction card furnished by the record holder. REMEMBER, YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT, SO PLEASE ACT TODAY.



TABLE OF CONTENTS

 
  Page
QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE MERGER       1

SUMMARY

 

    3
  The Companies       3
  The Proposed Merger       4
  What NOMOS Stockholders Will Receive in the Merger       4
  Amendment of NOMOS Certificate of Incorporation       5
  Recommendations to Stockholders       5
  Reasons for the Merger       6
  Opinion of NASI's Financial Advisor       6
  Opinion of NOMOS' Financial Advisor       7
  Consequences of Merger Not Being Approved       7
  Risks Associated with the Merger       7
  Board of Directors and Management Following the Merger       8
  Stockholder Votes Required       8
  Ownership of Common Stock of NASI After the Merger       9
  Treatment of NOMOS Stock Options and Warrants       9
  Conditions to Completion of the Merger     10
  Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences of the Merger     11
  Listing of Common Stock of NASI     12
  Dissenters' Appraisal Rights     12
  Interests of Certain Persons in the Merger     12
  Restrictions on Alternative Transactions     14
  Accounting Treatment of the Merger     14
  Summary Selected Historical Financial Information     14
  Summary Pro Forma Unaudited Financial Information     17
  Comparative Per Share Information     18
  Comparative Per Share Market Price     20
  Recent Closing Prices     20

RISK FACTORS

 

  21

CAUTIONARY STATEMENT CONCERNING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

 

  41

THE PROPOSED MERGER

 

  42
  General     42
  NASI's Proposals     42
  NOMOS' Proposals     43
  Background of the Merger     43
  Certain Exchanged Information     51
  Reasons of NASI's Board of Directors for the Merger     52
  Reasons of NOMOS' Board of Directors for the Merger     55
  Accounting Treatment of the Merger     58
  Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences of the Merger     58
  Dissenters' Appraisal Rights     62
  Federal Securities Laws Consequences; Stock Transfer Restriction Agreements     65
  Stock Exchange Listing     65

INFORMATION REGARDING NASI

 

  66
  Business     66
     

i


  Beneficial Ownership of Capital Stock of NASI     67

INFORMATION REGARDING AM CAPITAL I, INC.

 

  68

INFORMATION REGARDING NOMOS

 

  69
  Business     69
  Market Opportunity     70
  Business Strategy     71
  Technology and Products     72
  Competition     76
  Patents and Proprietary Technology     77
  Third-Party License Agreements     81
  Third-Party Reimbursement     81
  Manufacturing and Assembly Operations     82
  Government Regulations     83
  Customers     84
  Employees     84
  Facilities     84
  Legal Proceedings     84
  Management's Discussion and Analysis of NOMOS' Financial Condition and Results of Operations     86
  Stockholder Matters     98
  Beneficial Ownership of Capital Stock of NOMOS     98
  Management of NOMOS and the Executive Officers and Directors of NOMOS joining NASI   101
  Summary Compensation Table   101
  Option Grants in Last Fiscal Year   102
  Aggregate Option Exercises in Last Fiscal Year and Option Values at December 31, 2002   102
  Director Compensation   103
  Employment Contracts, Termination of Employment and Change-in-Control Arrangements   103
  Compensation Committee Interlocks   103
  Certain Relationships and Related Transactions of NOMOS   104

OPINIONS OF FINANCIAL ADVISORS

 

105
  Opinion of NASI's Financial Advisor—Bear, Stearns & Co. Inc.   105
  Opinion of NOMOS' Financial Advisor—CIBC World Markets Corp.   115

INTERESTS OF CERTAIN PERSONS IN THE MERGER

 

123
  Interests of Executive Officers and Directors of NASI and NOMOS in the Merger   123
  NASI Board of Directors Representation   123
  Loan Forgiveness—John A. Friede   123
  Severance Agreement—John A. Friede   123
  Series C Standstill Agreement   123
  Cash Merger Consideration—John A. Friede and John L. Cassis   124
  Employment Agreement with John W. Manzetti   124
  Treatment of NOMOS Stock Options   125
  Treatment of NOMOS Warrants   125
  Indemnification; Directors' and Officers' Insurance   125

THE MERGER AGREEMENT

 

126
  General   126
  Closing Matters   126
  Consideration to be Received in the Merger; Treatment of Stock Options and Warrants   126
     

ii


  Amendment of NOMOS Certificate of Incorporation   127
  Exchange of Stock Certificates in the Merger   128
  Fractional Shares   128
  Covenants   128
  Other Covenants and Agreements   131
  Representations and Warranties   132
  Conditions to Completion of the Merger   133
  Escrow Arrangement; Indemnification Escrow Agreement   135
  Stockholder Representative   136
  Termination of Merger Agreement   136
  Termination Fee   137
  Amendments, Extensions and Waivers   138

RELATED AGREEMENTS

 

139
  Voting Agreement; Irrevocable Proxies and Voting Trust   139
  Registration Rights Agreement   140
  Affiliate Letter   140
  Lock-Up Agreement   140
  Copromotion Agreement   141

PRO FORMA FINANCIAL DATA

 

142
  NASI and NOMOS Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Consolidated Financial Statements   144
  Notes to Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Consolidated Financial Statements   147

INFORMATION ABOUT THE SPECIAL MEETINGS AND VOTING

 

152
  The NASI Special Meeting   152
  The NOMOS Special Meeting   156

COMPARISON OF STOCKHOLDER RIGHTS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE MATTERS

 

160

DESCRIPTION OF NASI CAPITAL STOCK

 

174
  General   174
  Common Stock   174
  Preferred Stock   174
  Certain Anti-Takeover Effects of Provisions of the Certificate of Incorporation, Bylaws and Delaware Law   174
  Stockholder Rights Plan   175
  Transfer Agent   175

LEGAL MATTERS

 

176

EXPERTS

 

176

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION FOR STOCKHOLDERS

 

177
  Future Stockholder Proposals   177

WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION

 

178

INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

F-1

iii


ANNEXES


    Annex A-1

 

Agreement and Plan of Merger

 

A-1

    Annex A-2

 

First Amendment to Agreement and Plan of Merger

 

A-53

    Annex A-3

 

Second Amendment to Agreement and Plan of Merger

 

A-59

    Annex B

 

Voting Agreement

 

B-1

    Annex C

 

Form of Voting Trust Agreement

 

C-1

    Annex D

 

Form of Indemnification Escrow Agreement

 

D-1

    Annex E

 

Form of Registration Rights Agreement

 

E-1

    Annex F

 

Form of Affiliate Letter

 

F-1

    Annex G

 

Form of Lock-up Agreement

 

G-1

    Annex H

 

Opinion of Bear, Stearns & Co. Inc.

 

H-1

    Annex I

 

Opinion of CIBC World Markets Corp.

 

I-1

    Annex J

 

Delaware Appraisal Rights

 

J-1

    Annex K

 

Standstill Agreement

 

K-1

iv



QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE MERGER

Q:
Why are the companies proposing the merger?

A:
We believe that a combination of NASI and NOMOS will capitalize on the complementary strengths of each company and produce greater stockholder value than would be expected absent the proposed merger.

Q:
What do I need to do now?

A:
After you carefully read this document, including the annexes, please vote your shares as soon as possible so that your shares will be represented at your company's special meeting. Please follow the instructions set forth on the proxy card or on the instruction card provided by the record holder if your shares are held in the name of your broker, a bank or other nominee.

Q:
Why is my vote important?

A:
If you are a NASI stockholder and you do not submit a proxy or vote in person at your special meeting, it will not have any effect on the proposals to be presented at the special meeting, assuming a quorum is otherwise present at the special meeting. If you submit a proxy and affirmatively elect to abstain from voting, your proxy will be counted as present for purposes of determining the presence of a quorum and will have the same effect as a vote against each of the proposals to be voted on at the special meeting. NASI stockholder approval of each of the merger agreement, the proposed merger, the issuance of shares in connection with the merger and the other transactions contemplated by the merger agreement and the amendment to NASI's Amended and Restated 1996 Stock Option Plan to permit the issuance of replacement options in connection with a merger or consolidation is a condition to the consummation of the merger under the merger agreement. NASI stockholder approval of the amendment to NASI's Amended and Restated 1996 Stock Option Plan to increase the maximum number of shares available for issuance under the plan is not a condition to the consummation of the merger. See "Information About the Meetings and Voting—The NASI Special Meeting" on page 152.
Q:
If my shares are held in street name by my broker, will my broker vote my shares for me?

A:
If you hold your shares in a stock brokerage account or if your shares are held by a bank or nominee (that is, in street name), you must provide the record holder of your shares with instructions on how to vote your shares. Please refer to the voting instruction card used by your broker nominee to see if you may submit voting instructions by Internet or telephone. You cannot vote shares held in street name by returning a proxy card directly to NASI or to NOMOS or by voting in person at your stockholders' meeting.

1


Q:
Can I change my vote after I have mailed my proxy card?

A:
Yes. Stockholders who hold shares in their own name can change their vote at any time before their proxy is voted at their company's special meeting. You can do this by using any of the following methods:
Q:
When and where are the special meetings?

A:
NASI's special meeting will take place on Monday, May 3, 2004, at the Warner Center Marriott Hotel, 21850 Oxnard Street, Woodland Hills, California 91367, at 10:00 a.m., local time.
Q:
Should NOMOS stockholders send in their stock certificates now?

A:
No. After the merger is consummated, NASI will send NOMOS stockholders written instructions for exchanging their stock certificates. NASI stockholders may keep their existing stock certificates.

Q:
When do you expect the merger to be completed?

A:
We hope to complete the merger as soon as possible after the special meetings occur and all closing conditions under the merger agreement are satisfied, which we currently anticipate to occur on or about May 4, 2004.

Q:
Who do I call if I have questions about the special meetings or the merger?

A:
If you have any questions about the merger, or if you need additional copies of this joint proxy statement/prospectus or the enclosed proxy, you should contact:

NASI STOCKHOLDERS:   NOMOS STOCKHOLDERS:

Georgesen Shareholder Communications
17 State Street
New York, New York 10004
(800) 213-0347
Attention: NASI Inquiries

 

NOMOS Corporation
200 West Kensinger Drive, Suite 100
Cranberry Township, Pennsylvania 16066
(724) 741-8200
Attention: David J. Haffner

You may also obtain additional information about NASI from documents filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission by following the instructions in the section entitled "Where You Can Find More Information" on page 178.

2



SUMMARY

        This summary highlights information from this joint proxy statement/prospectus that we believe is important information to be considered by stockholders in determining how to vote on the proposals described in this joint proxy statement/prospectus. This summary may not contain all of the information that is important to you, and we encourage you to read this joint proxy statement/prospectus in its entirety. The information contained in this summary is qualified in its entirety by, and should be read in conjunction with, the detailed information and financial statements, including the notes thereto, appearing elsewhere in this joint proxy statement/prospectus and the documents incorporated into this joint proxy statement/prospectus by reference. In the event there is any material change in this joint proxy statement/prospectus, we will resolicit stockholder votes. See "Where You Can Find More Information" on page 178. We have included references to other portions of this joint proxy statement/prospectus to direct you to a more complete description of the topics presented in this summary.

The Companies

North American Scientific, Inc. (see page 66)
AM Capital I, Inc. (see page 68)
20200 Sunburst Street
Chatsworth, California 91311
(818) 734-8600
Internet Address: www.NASI.net (Information set forth in NASI's website is not incorporated herein by reference.)

        North American Scientific, Inc. is engaged in the design, development and production of innovative radioactive products, including sealed radioactive sources about the size of a grain of rice, that are implanted into the prostate gland, delivering a prescribed, therapeutic dose of radiation to treat prostate cancer, which we refer to as brachytherapy seeds. Brachytherapy is minimally invasive means to treat prostate cancer with reduced side effects. We also are developing a radioactive imaging agent which is intended to be used primarily to determine the efficacy of chemotherapy which we refer to as a radiopharmaceutical. NASI's brachytherapy seeds are marketed under the trade name Prospera®. NASI's lead radiopharmaceutical product candidate is Hynic-Annexin V. It is administered intravenously and is intended for the in vivo imaging of apoptosis and necrosis, two common forms of cell death.

        AM Capital I, Inc. is a Delaware corporation and a wholly owned subsidiary of NASI. AM Capital I, Inc. was organized for the purpose of entering into the merger agreement with NOMOS, completing the merger and being the surviving corporation in the merger. It has not conducted any business operations. If the merger is consummated, NOMOS will cease to exist following the merger of it with and into AM Capital I, Inc. and AM Capital I, Inc. will change its name immediately following the merger to NOMOS Corporation.

NOMOS Corporation (see page 69)
200 West Kensinger Drive, Suite 100
Cranberry Township, PA 16066
(724) 741-8200
Internet Address: www.NOMOS.com (Information set forth in NOMOS' website is not incorporated herein by reference.)

        NOMOS Corporation is a leading supplier of planning and delivery technology for Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy, or IMRT. IMRT allows an escalated radiation dose to be delivered to a tumor while limiting exposure and damage to nearby healthy tissue. In addition, NOMOS offers both BAT®, an ultrasound-based targeting and organ locator system used primarily in prostate cancer treatments, and PEREGRINE™, the first commercially available photon-based dose calculation system

3



to incorporate state-of-the-art Monte Carlo radiation transport techniques to more accurately predict the radiation dose delivered to tumors and other structures within a patient's body "before" radiation treatment is delivered. NOMOS recently introduced NOMOS RxSM, a remote treatment planning service that makes IMRT feasible for many facilities that, due to staffing or financial constraints, might otherwise not be able to take advantage of the potential benefits of IMRT. NOMOS' products are used at over 400 institutions, including some of the world's preeminent cancer institutions. These products are currently used predominantly in the treatment of tumors of the prostate, head, neck and spinal cord.

        NOMOS®, PEACOCK®, MIMiC®, CORVUS®, BAT®, BEAK®, TALON® and CRANE® are registered trademarks of NOMOS Corporation. PEREGRINE™ is a trademark of The Regents of the University of California. All other service marks, trademarks and trade names referred to in this joint proxy statement/prospectus are the property of their respective owners.

The Proposed Merger (see page 42)

        Under the terms of the proposed merger, NOMOS will merge with and into AM Capital I, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of NASI formed for the purpose of the merger. AM Capital I, Inc. will survive the merger as a wholly owned subsidiary of NASI and will change its name immediately following the merger to "NOMOS Corporation".

        The merger agreement, as amended, is included as Annex A-1, Annex A-2 and Annex A-3 to this joint proxy statement/prospectus. We encourage you to read carefully the merger agreement in its entirety, as it is the principal legal document that sets forth the terms of and governs the merger. References throughout this joint proxy statement/prospectus to the merger agreement shall mean the merger agreement as amended by the first amendment and the second amendment as discussed below in the section entitled "The Merger Agreement—Amendments, Extensions and Waivers".

What NOMOS Stockholders Will Receive in the Merger (see "The Merger Agreement—Consideration to be Received in the Merger; Treatment of Stock Options" on page 126)

        If the merger is consummated, NOMOS stockholders will receive:

        The exchange ratio is fixed and will not be adjusted for changes in the market value of the common stock of NASI. NASI will not issue fractional shares in the merger. Therefore, the total number of shares of NASI common stock that each NOMOS stockholder will receive in the merger will be rounded down to the nearest whole number, and each NOMOS stockholder will receive a cash payment for the remaining fraction of a share of NASI common stock that he or she would otherwise receive, if any, based on the average closing price of NASI common stock for the 10 consecutive trading days ending on and including the last trading date prior to the date of the consummation of the merger.

        Pursuant to the merger agreement, approximately 15.8% of the shares of NASI common stock and cash otherwise payable to NOMOS stockholders in the merger will automatically be deposited in two separate escrow funds upon consummation of the merger. With respect to the first escrow fund, up to

4



approximately 526,810 shares of NASI common stock and approximately $1.2 million of cash will be held for a period of two years following the effective time of the merger to serve as a source of reimbursement to NASI and certain related parties for losses arising from any breach by NOMOS of its representations or obligations under the merger agreement. With the respect to the second escrow fund, 307,617 shares of NASI common stock and $700,800 of cash will be held to serve solely as a source of reimbursement to NASI and certain related parties for any losses incurred by NASI or NOMOS in connection with the demand made against NOMOS by Parker/Hunter incorporated as discussed in "Information Regarding NOMOS—Legal Proceedings" of this joint proxy statement/prospectus.

        In addition, certain non-corporate holders of NOMOS stock may be subject to backup withholding, at applicable federal rates, on amounts received pursuant to the merger. See "The Proposed Merger—Backup Withholding" on page 61.

Amendment of NOMOS Certificate of Incorporation (see "The Merger Agreement—Amendment of NOMOS Certificate of Incorporation" on page 127)

        On November 25, 2003, NOMOS' board of directors, by unanimous written consent, adopted an amended and restated certificate of incorporation, to become effective immediately prior to the consummation of the merger, which amended certificate would confirm that, upon the consummation of the merger, the holders of NOMOS' common stock and each of NOMOS' series of preferred stock would be entitled to receive, and would only be entitled to receive, the merger consideration and other treatment provided for in the merger agreement. Under NOMOS' existing certificate of incorporation, an amendment to outstanding series B preferred stock and (iv) at least 75% of the outstanding series C preferred stock, voting both together as one class, on an as-converted-to-common stock basis, and as separate classes. Pursuant to a written consent dated January 6, 2004, NOMOS stockholders having sufficient votes to do so, approved and adopted the amended and restated certificate of incorporation. The amended and restated certificate of incorporation will be filed and will take effect immediately prior to the consummation of the merger. If the merger is not consummated, the amended and restated certificate of incorporation will not become effective.

Recommendations to Stockholders

To NASI Stockholders (see "The Proposed Merger—Reasons of NASI's Board of Directors for the Merger" on page 52):

        NASI's board of directors believes that the merger is advisable, fair to and in the best interests of NASI stockholders and unanimously recommends that NASI stockholders vote FOR the proposals to:

5


To NOMOS Stockholders (see "The Proposed Merger—Reasons of NOMOS' Board of Directors for the Merger" on page 55):

        NOMOS' board of directors believes that the merger is advisable, fair to and in the best interests of NOMOS stockholders and recommends that NOMOS stockholders vote FOR the proposals to:

Reasons for the Merger (see pages 52 and 55)

        The boards of directors of both companies believe that the combined company will benefit from:

        The boards of directors of both companies also recognize that there are risks associated with the merger, including:


Opinion of NASI's Financial Advisor (see page 105)

        On October 25, 2003, Bear, Stearns & Co. Inc., or Bear Stearns, financial advisor to NASI, rendered to NASI's board of directors its oral opinion, subsequently confirmed by delivery of a written opinion dated October 25, 2003, that, as of that date, and based upon and subject to the facts, assumptions and limitations set forth in the opinion, the aggregate amount of shares to be issued and cash to be paid to holders of capital stock of NOMOS (the "Merger Consideration") in connection with the merger was fair from a financial point of view to NASI. The opinion of Bear Stearns did not address the fairness of the Merger Consideration to NASI stockholders. The full text of Bear Stearns' written opinion is included as Annex H to this joint proxy statement/prospectus. We encourage you to read carefully Bear Stearns' opinion in its entirety and the description on page 105 of this joint proxy statement/prospectus for a discussion of the procedures followed, assumptions made, matters

6



considered and limitations on the review undertaken. Bear Stearns provided its opinion for the use and benefit of NASI's board of directors in its consideration of the merger and Bear Stearns' opinion did not constitute a recommendation to the board of directors to approve the merger and does not constitute a recommendation as to how any stockholder should vote on the merger or any matter related thereto.

Opinion of NOMOS' Financial Advisor (see page 115)

        In connection with the merger, the NOMOS board of directors received a written opinion of NOMOS' financial advisor, CIBC World Markets Corp., referred to as CIBC World Markets, as to the fairness, from a financial point of view, to the holders of NOMOS common stock of the 0.891 common stock exchange ratio provided for in the merger. The full text of CIBC World Markets' written opinion, dated October 24, 2003, is attached to this joint proxy statement/prospectus as Annex I. We encourage you to read this opinion carefully in its entirety for a description of the assumptions made, procedures followed, matters considered and limitations on the review undertaken. CIBC World Markets' opinion was provided to the NOMOS board of directors in connection with its evaluation of the common stock exchange ratio and relates only to the fairness, from a financial point of view, of the common stock exchange ratio to the holders of NOMOS common stock. The opinion does not address any other aspect of the merger and does not constitute a recommendation as to how any stockholder should vote or act with respect to any matters relating to the merger.

Consequences of Merger Not Being Approved

        If the stockholders of either company fail to approve the proposals required to effect the merger at their respective meetings, or if the merger is not otherwise completed, the ongoing businesses of each of NASI and NOMOS may suffer. Under specified circumstances, either NASI or NOMOS may be required to pay a termination fee to the other party. Additionally, both parties will have incurred costs associated with the merger without realizing the benefits of having the merger completed. In the event the merger is not approved, each of NASI and NOMOS will continue to operate their respective existing businesses and may evaluate opportunities to merge with or acquire companies with complementary businesses. See the section entitled "Risk Factors" beginning on page 21.

Risks Associated with the Merger

        While the merger is pending and if the merger is completed, stockholders of NASI and NOMOS will be subject to a number of risks to which they are not currently subject. These risks include, among others, the following:


        For a complete discussion of these and other risks relating to the merger, see the section entitled "Risk Factors" beginning on page 21.

7


Board of Directors and Management Following the Merger (see "Interests of Certain Persons in the Merger" on page 123 and "The Merger Agreement—Other Covenants and Agreements" on page 131)

        Upon completion of the merger, L. Michael Cutrer, president and chief executive officer of NASI, will remain as president and chief executive officer of NASI and John W. Manzetti, president and chief executive officer of NOMOS, will serve as president of the surviving corporation of the merger, which will be a wholly owned subsidiary of NASI and will change its name immediately following the merger to "NOMOS Corporation".

        NASI and NOMOS have agreed that, immediately after the consummation of the merger, NASI will take all actions necessary to expand its board of directors to consist of nine members. Seven of the nine members will be persons who served on NASI's board of directors immediately prior to the consummation of the merger. The two additional members will be John W. Manzetti and John A. Friede, chairman of the board of directors of NOMOS.

Stockholder Votes Required

For NASI Stockholders (see page 152):

        Approval of each of:

requires the affirmative vote of at least a majority of the voting power present at the special meeting, as long as a quorum, which is a majority of the shares entitled to vote, is present in person or by proxy at the special meeting. Stockholder approval of each of the foregoing proposals is a condition to the consummation of the proposed merger, which cannot be waived by the parties.

        Approval of the amendment to the Amended and Restated 1996 Stock Option Plan to increase the maximum number of shares available for issuance under the plan from 4,000,000 to 4,600,000 shares requires the affirmative vote of at least a majority of the voting power present at the special meeting, as long as a quorum, which is a majority of the shares entitled to vote, is present in person or by proxy at the special meeting. Stockholder approval of the amendment to the Amended and Restated 1996 Stock Option Plan to increase the maximum number of shares available for issuance under the plan from 4,000,000 to 4,600,000 shares is not a condition to the consummation of the merger. If this proposal is not approved, the proposed merger can still be consummated. If approved, this proposal will still be effective even if the merger is not consummated.

        Approval of any proposal to adjourn the special meeting, if necessary, to solicit additional votes in favor of the foregoing proposals requires the affirmative vote of at least a majority of the voting power present at the special meeting, as long as a quorum is present in person or by proxy at the special meeting.

        On the record date, directors and executive officers of NASI and their affiliates beneficially owned or had the right to vote 1,858,472 shares of NASI common stock, representing approximately 11.2% of the shares of NASI common stock outstanding on the record date. To NASI's knowledge, the directors and executive officers of NASI and their affiliates intend to vote their common stock in favor of the proposals described in the preceding paragraph.

For NOMOS Stockholders (see page 156):

        Approval of the merger agreement and the proposed merger requires the affirmative vote of at least a majority of the outstanding shares of NOMOS common stock and preferred stock, voting

8



together as a group, on an as-converted-to-common stock basis. Approval of any proposal to adjourn the special meeting, if necessary, to solicit additional votes in favor of the merger requires the affirmative vote of at least a majority of the votes of NOMOS common stock and preferred stock present at the special meeting, voting together as a group, on an as-converted-to-common stock basis.

        On the record date, directors and executive officers of NOMOS and their affiliates had the right to vote 4,191,769 shares of NOMOS common stock and preferred stock on an as-converted-to-common stock basis, representing approximately 57% of the outstanding shares of NOMOS stock on an as-converted-to-common stock basis as of the record date. John A. Friede, chairman of the board of NOMOS, has entered into a voting agreement with NASI whereby he has agreed to vote certain shares beneficially owned by him, representing approximately 41% of the outstanding voting shares of NOMOS stock on an as-converted-to-common stock basis outstanding on the record date, in favor of the merger agreement and the proposed merger. This voting agreement is attached to this joint proxy statement/prospectus as Annex B. In addition, to NOMOS' knowledge, the other directors and executive officers of NOMOS and their affiliates intend to vote their common stock and preferred stock in favor of the merger agreement and the proposed merger and, if necessary, the proposal to adjourn the special meeting to solicit additional votes.

Ownership of Common Stock of NASI After the Merger

        Upon consummation of the merger, NASI stockholders will own approximately 63% of the outstanding common stock of NASI and NOMOS stockholders will own approximately 37% of the outstanding common stock of NASI, measured on a fully diluted basis. For purposes of the preceding sentence, fully diluted means that the number of shares of common stock issuable upon conversion or exercise, as applicable, of outstanding convertible securities (including, without limitation, warrants to purchase stock) and stock options with conversion prices or exercise prices, as applicable, that are less than the market price of the applicable company's common stock minus the number of shares of stock that could be purchased with the proceeds that would be received by the companies from the conversion or exercise of such securities or options (assuming such securities or options were actually converted or exercised), are deemed to be outstanding. The ownership percentages are based on the number of shares of NASI and NOMOS common stock, convertible preferred stock, warrants and stock options outstanding on October 24, 2003.

Treatment of NOMOS Stock Options and Warrants (see "The Merger Agreement—Consideration to be Received in the Merger; Treatment of Stock Options and Warrants" on page 126)

        In the merger, each outstanding stock option exercisable for NOMOS common stock will be converted into an option to purchase a number of shares common stock of NASI equal to the number (rounding down any fractional shares) of shares of NOMOS common stock acquirable upon the exercise of the option multiplied by 0.891. The per share exercise price of each new NASI option will be equal to the per share exercise price of the corresponding NOMOS stock option divided by 0.891. In addition, effective upon the consummation of the merger, all outstanding unvested NOMOS stock options held by current NOMOS directors and employees will immediately vest. Each outstanding warrant to purchase shares of NOMOS common stock shall by virtue of the merger be assumed by NASI. Each warrant assumed by NASI under the merger agreement will continue to have, and be subject to, the same terms and conditions of the original warrant, except that: (1) each assumed warrant will be exercisable for an applicable number of shares of NASI common stock equal to the number (rounding down any fractional shares) of shares of NOMOS common stock previously acquirable upon the exercise of the warrant multiplied by 0.891 and (2) the per share exercise price of each assumed warrant will be equal to the previous per share exercise price divided by 0.891

9



Conditions to Completion of the Merger (see page 133)

        The obligations of NOMOS and NASI to effect the merger are subject to the satisfaction of the following conditions:

        Neither NASI nor NOMOS currently intends to waive any of the foregoing conditions to the extent such waiver would otherwise be permissible.

        The obligations of NOMOS to effect the merger are subject to the satisfaction or waiver of the following additional conditions:

        The obligations of NASI to effect the merger are subject to the satisfaction or waiver of the following additional conditions:

10


        Where the law permits, a party to the merger agreement could elect to waive a condition to its obligation to complete the merger although that condition has not been satisfied. NASI has received an executed copy of the stockholders' voting agreement referenced in the final bullet point above. In addition, the parties do not believe that a filing or waiting period under the Hart-Scott Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976, as amended, is required in connection with the proposed merger, nor are the parties aware of any other filings or waiting periods that would apply to the proposed merger under applicable anti-trust laws. We cannot be certain when (or if) the other conditions to the merger will be satisfied or waived or that the merger will be completed. We do not intend to consummate the merger if the shares of NASI common stock to be issued in the merger are not approved for quotation on the NASDAQ National Market System. In the event that either party waives any of the other conditions to the merger, we do not intend to amend this joint proxy statement/prospectus or resolicit proxies to vote in favor of the merger prior to the special meeting except for a waiver of the condition by either party that it receive an opinion of legal counsel stating that the merger will qualify as a reorganization under the Internal Revenue Code or, in the case of the waiver of any other conditions, unless we deem such condition to be material.

Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences of the Merger (see page 58)

        Assuming the merger qualifies as a reorganization within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or the Code, for U.S. federal income tax purposes, which NASI and NOMOS anticipate, holders of NOMOS capital stock whose shares of NOMOS common stock and preferred stock are exchanged in the merger for shares of common stock of NASI will not recognize gain or loss, except to the extent of the cash received by certain preferred stockholders and the cash, if any, received in lieu of a fractional share of common stock of the combined company.

        The discussion of material U.S. federal income tax consequences of the merger contained in this joint proxy statement/prospectus is intended to provide only a general summary and is not a complete analysis or description of all potential U.S. federal income tax consequences of the merger. The discussion does not address tax consequences that may vary with, or are contingent on, individual circumstances. In addition, it does not address any foreign, state or local taxes. NASI and NOMOS strongly urge each holder of NOMOS common stock and preferred stock to consult his or her tax advisor to determine the particular U.S. federal, state, or local or foreign income or other tax consequences of the merger to that stockholder.

        It is a condition to the completion of the merger that NASI receive a written opinion from McDermott, Will & Emery and that NOMOS receive a written opinion from Cohen & Grigsby, P.C., in each case dated as of the effective date of the merger, to the effect that the merger will qualify as a reorganization within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the Code. Neither NASI nor NOMOS currently intends to waive this closing condition. However, in the event that either NASI or NOMOS waives receipt of such written opinion from its counsel, NASI and NOMOS will file a new joint proxy statement/prospectus and resolicit the approval of each of our stockholders which includes disclosure that does not characterize the merger as a reorganization within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the Code.

11



Listing of Common Stock of NASI (see page 65)

        It is expected that the shares of common stock of NASI to be issued in the merger will be listed for trading on the Nasdaq National Market under the ticker symbol "NASI".

Dissenters' Appraisal Rights (see page 62)

        Each of NASI and NOMOS is incorporated under the laws of the State of Delaware. Under Delaware law, NASI stockholders will not have dissenters' rights of appraisal in connection with the issuance of shares of NASI's common stock in the merger.

        Under Delaware law, NOMOS stockholders are entitled to appraisal rights in connection with the proposed merger, which rights are subject to certain conditions discussed more fully elsewhere in this joint proxy statement/prospectus. Appraisal rights entitle NOMOS stockholders who:

to receive a valuation of their shares and a payment of that value in cash in lieu of the consideration called for by the merger agreement.

        Failure by a dissenting stockholder to follow the steps required by law for perfecting appraisal rights may lead to the loss of those rights, in which case such dissenting stockholder will be treated in the same manner as a non-dissenting stockholder.

        See Annex J for a reproduction of Section 262 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, which relates to the appraisal rights of dissenting stockholders. In view of the complexity of law relating to appraisal rights, NOMOS stockholders who are considering objecting to the merger and seeking such appraisal rights are encouraged to consult their own legal advisors.

        Pursuant to the terms of the merger agreement, NASI will be released from its obligation to consummate the merger if the shares of NOMOS common stock held by stockholders who have exercised appraisal rights exceed 5% of the outstanding shares of NOMOS common stock.

 Interests of Certain Persons in the Merger (see page 123)

        When stockholders of NASI and NOMOS consider the respective recommendations of the board of directors thereof that such stockholders vote in favor of the proposals relating to the merger, they should be aware that certain directors and executive officers of NASI and NOMOS have interests in the merger that may be different from, or in addition to, the interests of stockholders generally. These interested individuals, including Messrs. Manzetti, Friede and Cassis, participated in the deliberation of NOMOS board of directors regarding the merger; however, the interests of such individuals were (to the extent they then existed) fully disclosed to the disinterested directors at the time of such deliberations.

        All NOMOS executive officers, including Mr. Manzetti, William W. Wells (NOMOS' executive vice president of sales), David J. Haffner (NOMOS' chief financial officer), Fred L. Marroni (NOMOS' vice president of engineering), Joseph M. Argyros (NOMOS' vice presient of operations) and Francis X. Dobscha (NOMOS' vice president of quality and regulatory affairs) have interests in the combined company as employees in terms of job responsibilities, working environment and compensation which are in addition to and different from their interests as stockholders and/or the rights to receive payment under existing severance agreements with NOMOS in the event they are not retained as employees. All continuing directors, including Messrs. Manzetti and Friede, will have the responsibility for being directors of a larger company after the merger.

12



        Immediately after the consummation of the merger, NASI will take all actions necessary to expand its board of directors to consist of nine members. Seven of the nine members will be persons who served on NASI's board of directors immediately prior to the completion of the merger. The two additional members will be John W. Manzetti, NOMOS' president and a director, and John A. Friede, NOMOS' largest stockholder and chairman of NOMOS' board of directors.

        Mr. Manzetti, the president and chief executive officer of NOMOS, will have an employment agreement pursuant to which he will continue to be employed by the combined company after the consummation of the merger. If the merger is consummated, Mr. Manzetti will be employed as the president of the surviving corporation of the merger, which will be a wholly owned subsidiary of NASI and change its name immediately following the merger to "NOMOS Corporation". The employment agreement includes rights to receive options in NASI and right to severance payments upon the occurrence of certain events such as a change of control of the company.

        The merger agreement provides for a combination of cash and NASI common stock to be paid to the NOMOS stockholders. All of the cash consideration in the merger, other than with respect to fractional shares, will be paid to the holders of NOMOS series B preferred stock and series C preferred stock. Mr. Friede, chairman of the board of directors of NOMOS, beneficially owns approximately 80% of the outstanding NOMOS series B preferred stock and John L. Cassis, a member of the NOMOS board of directors, beneficially owns approximately 32% of the outstanding NOMOS series C preferred stock. For more information regarding the cash component of the merger consideration, see "The Merger Agreement" beginning on page 126 and "Beneficial Ownership of Capital Stock of NOMOS" beginning on page 98.

        Mr. Friede currently owes NOMOS $287,160, plus interest, which principal amount was loaned to Mr. Friede on May 22, 2003. In partial consideration for the time, efforts and resources that Mr. Friede has provided NOMOS in the past, NOMOS has agreed, subject to the consummation of the merger, to cancel this indebtedness which cancellation will be effective prior to the consummation of the merger. See "Information Regarding NOMOS—Certain Relationships and Related Transactions of NOMOS" beginning on page 104.

        NOMOS is party to a letter agreement dated February 11, 2002 with Mr. Friede, which provides that if Mr. Friede's employment is terminated without cause, he will receive continued payment of his base salary, which is currently $180,000 per year, and health benefits for twelve months after the termination date. Mr. Friede will be terminated as an employee without cause following the consummation of the merger. Therefore, the surviving corporation to the merger will be obligated to pay this severance to Mr. Friede.

        In addition, pursuant to the terms of a voting agreement Mr. Friede has agreed to vote certain shares beneficially owned by him, representing approximately 41% of the voting shares of NOMOS common stock on an as-converted-to-common stock basis, outstanding on the record date in favor of the merger agreement, the proposed merger and the other transactions contemplated by the merger agreement.

        Effective on the completion of the merger, all outstanding unvested NOMOS stock options held by current NOMOS directors and employees, including those held by NOMOS' executive officers, will immediately vest.

        Pursuant to the terms of a standstill agreement between NOMOS and certain of its holders of series C preferred stock, NOMOS has agreed to pay to each holder of its series C preferred stock, concurrently with the closing of the merger, an amount equal to $0.15 per share of series C preferred stock held by them, for an aggregate payment of $200,422.77. John L. Cassis, a member of the NOMOS board of directors, beneficially owns approximately 32% of the outstanding NOMOS series C preferred stock and, accordingly, he (or entities with which he is affiliated) would receive a significant

13


portion of such consideration if paid. See "Interest of Certain Persons in the Merger—Series C Standstill Agreement" beginning on page 123.

 Restrictions on Alternative Transactions (see "The Merger Agreement—Covenants—No Solicitation" on page 129)

        The merger agreement contains restrictions on the ability of each of NOMOS and NASI to solicit or engage in discussions or negotiations with a third party with respect to a proposal to acquire a significant interest in the respective companies. Notwithstanding these restrictions, the merger agreement provides that under specified circumstances, if either party receives an acquisition proposal from a third party that is a superior proposal, as defined in the merger agreement, such party may engage in negotiations regarding the superior proposal with that third party.

        If terminated, the merger agreement will become void and, except in circumstances where a termination fee is payable, neither party will have any liability to the other party under the merger agreement. Upon a termination, a party may become obligated to pay to the other party a termination fee, NOMOS will be obligated to pay a termination fee to NASI equal to $3,000,000 if certain circumstances are met. NASI will be obligated to pay a termination fee to NOMOS equal to $1,500,000 if certain circumstances are met. See "The Merger Agreement—Termination Fee" on page 137.

 Accounting Treatment of the Merger (see page 58)

        NASI will account for the merger under the purchase method of accounting for business combinations under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, which means that the assets and liabilities of NOMOS will be recorded, as of the completion of the merger, at their fair values and added to those of NASI.

Summary Selected Historical Financial Information

        NASI and NOMOS are providing the following financial information to aid you in your analysis of the financial aspects of the merger. NASI derived the summary selected historical consolidated balance sheets data and consolidated statements of operations data as of and for the years ended October 31, 1999 through October 31, 2003 from the audited consolidated financial statements of NASI for those respective periods and derived statements of operations data for the three months ended January 31, 2003 and 2004 and the balance sheet data as of January 31, 2004 from the unaudited consolidated financial statements of NASI for those periods. NOMOS derived the summary selected historical consolidated balance sheets data and consolidated statements of operations data as of and for the years ended December 31, 1999 through December 31, 2003 from the audited consolidated financial statements of NOMOS for those respective periods.

        In the opinion of NASI's management, the unaudited consolidated financial statements for NASI have been prepared on a basis consistent with its audited consolidated financial statements and include all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, necessary for the fair presentation of the financial position and results of operations for the applicable periods. The operating results for the three months ended January 31, 2004 for NASI are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the entire fiscal year of NASI or the combined company after the merger.

        The tables below represent summary selected historical consolidated statements of operations and consolidated balance sheets data of NASI and NOMOS and you should read it together with the historical financial statements and related notes contained in the annual reports and other information that NASI has filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and incorporated by reference into this joint proxy statement/prospectus, and read in conjunction with NOMOS' financial statements, the related notes and "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" included elsewhere in this joint proxy statement/prospectus. See "Where You Can Find More Information" on page 178 for more information.

14



North American Scientific, Inc.
(in thousands, except per share data)

 
  Years ended October 31,
  Three Months Ended
January 31,

 
 
  1999
  2000
  2001
  2002
  2003
  2003
  2004
 
 
   
   
   
   
   
  (unaudited)

 
Consolidated Statement of Operations Data:                                            
Revenues   $ 12,767   $ 17,490   $ 19,343   $ 20,780   $ 14,683   $ 5,141   $ 3,363  
Cost of goods sold     4,594     5,834     6,862     7,581     6,944     1,843     1,905  
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  Gross profit     8,173     11,656     12,481     13,199     7,739     3,298     1,458  
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Operating expenses:                                            
  Research and development     287     417     7,602     8,951     7,351     1,957     1,444  
  Selling, general and administrative     3,060     3,725     6,097     6,525     11,266     2,415     4,155  
  Purchased in-process research and development         11,431                      
  Write-off of licenses and equipment(1)             3,743     2,714              
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
    Total operating expenses     3,347     15,573     17,442     18,190     18,617     4,372     5,599  
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Income (loss) from operations     4,826     (3,917 )   (4,961 )   (4,991 )   (10,878 )   (1,074 )   (4,141 )
Interest and other income, net     611     1,110     1,886     1,834     1,749     358     211  
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Income (loss) before provision (benefit) for income taxes     5,437     (2,807 )   (3,075 )   (3,157 )   (9,129 )   (716 )   (3,930 )
Provision (benefit) for income taxes     2,068     3,221     (1,090 )   2,087              
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net income (loss) before cumulative effect of change in accounting principle     3,369     (6,028 )   (1,985 )   (5,244 )   (9,129 )   (716 )   (3,930 )
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle(2)                     (311 )   (311 )    
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net income (loss)   $ 3,369   $ (6,028 ) $ (1,985 ) $ (5,244 ) $ (9,440 ) $ (1,027 ) $ (3,930 )
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Basic earnings (loss) per share:                                            
  Earnings (loss) per share before cumulative effect of change in accounting principle   $ 0.49   $ (0.87 ) $ (0.20 ) $ (0.51 ) $ (0.89 ) $ (0.07 ) $ (0.38 )
  Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle                     (0.03 )   (0.03 )    
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  Net income (loss)   $ 0.49   $ (0.87 ) $ (0.20 ) $ (0.51 ) $ (0.92 ) $ (0.10 ) $ (0.38 )
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Diluted earnings (loss) per share:                                            
  Earnings (loss) per share before cumulative effect of change in accounting principle   $ 0.47   $ (0.87 ) $ (0.20 ) $ (0.51 ) $ (0.89 ) $ (0.07 ) $ (0.38 )
  Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle                     (0.03 )   (0.03 )    
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  Net income (loss)   $ 0.47   $ (0.87 ) $ (0.20 ) $ (0.51 ) $ (0.92 ) $ (0.10 ) $ (0.38 )
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Shares used in basic and diluted per share calculation     7,203     6,907     9,783     10,210     10,258     10,256     10,283  
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  As of October 31,
   
   
 

 


 

As of
January 31, 2004


 
 
  1999
  2000
  2001
  2002
  2003
 
 
   
   
   
   
   
  (unaudited)

 
Consolidated Balance Sheet Data:                                            
Cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities   $ 9,662   $ 12,172   $ 54,342   $ 55,945   $ 48,765     $44,677  
Cash held in variable interest entity                     350            308  
Working capital     11,354     8,727     36,064     39,469     31,970       27,634  
Total assets     23,988     31,714     72,681     69,135     62,532       58,509  
Total debt         2,500                          —  
Total stockholders' equity     22,366     25,721     69,873     64,901     55,746       52,623  

(1)
Represents the write-off of costs incurred related to two linear particle accelerators of $3,743,000 in 2001; write-off of abandoned licenses and related equipment costs of $2,714,000 related to certain technology licensed from third parties in 2002.
(2)
Represents cumulative effect for the change in recognizing future decommissioning costs of leased manufacturing and research and development facilities.

15



NOMOS Corporation
(in thousands, except per share data)

 
  Years ended December 31,
 
 
  1999
  2000
  2001
  2002
  2003
 
Statement of Operations Data:                                
Revenues   $ 9,950   $ 13,362   $ 24,505   $ 31,125   $ 29,013  
Cost of revenues(1)     5,797     6,715     11,659     14,454     14,408  
   
 
 
 
 
 
  Gross profit     4,153     6,647     12,846     16,671     14,605  
   
 
 
 
 
 
Operating expenses:                                
  Research and development(1)     3,954     4,479     4,152     5,392     4,785  
  Sales and marketing(1)     4,326     4,253     3,984     6,663     6,752  
  General and administrative(1)     3,827     3,296     2,951     4,193     3,767  
  Write-off of investments(2)     450                  
  Stock-based compensation             2,445     52     2,342  
  Offering, relocation and merger costs(7)                 2,507     610  
   
 
 
 
 
 
    Total operating expenses     12,557     12,028     13,532     18,807     18,256  
   
 
 
 
 
 
Income (loss) from operations     (8,404 )   (5,381 )   (686 )   (2,136 )   (3,651 )
Interest and other income (expense), net(3)     (912 )   (4,997 )   103     71     1,812  
   
 
 
 
 
 
Income (loss) from continuing operations     (9,316 )   (10,378 )   (583 )   (2,065 )   (1,839 )
Loss from discontinued operations(4)     (7,001 )   (1,155 )            
   
 
 
 
 
 
Net income (loss)     (16,317 )   (11,533 )   (583 )   (2,065 )   (1,839 )
Plus preferred dividends     (501 )       (1,226 )   (1,799 )   (2,041 )
   
 
 
 
 
 
Net income (loss) available to common stockholders   $ (16,818 ) $ (11,533 ) $ (1,809 ) $ (3,864 ) $ (3,880 )
   
 
 
 
 
 
Net income (loss) per share, basic and diluted(6):                                
  Continuing operations   $ (3.61 ) $ (3.71 ) $ (0.63 ) $ (1.19 ) $ (1.07 )
  Discontinued operations     (2.71 )   (0.41 )            
   
 
 
 
 
 
    $ (6.32 ) $ (4.12 ) $ (0.63 ) $ (1.19 ) $ (1.07 )
   
 
 
 
 
 
Shares used in per share calculation(6):                                
  Basic     2,580     2,797     2,856     3,240     3,616  
  Diluted     2,580     2,797     2,856     3,240     3,616  

 


 

As of December 31,


 
 
  1999
  2000
  2001
  2002
  2003
 
Balance Sheet Data:                                
Cash and cash equivalents   $ 668   $ 665   $ 5,991   $ 3,272   $ 3,139  
Working capital (deficiency)     (9,187 )   (724 )   6,489     5,074     4,556  
Total assets     10,170     8,025     15,871     15,810     16,535  
Long-term obligations, net of current portion         18,273     725     1,236     1,246  
Redeemable series C preferred stock(5)             5,862     7,661     9,702  
Total stockholders' equity (deficit)     (8,480 )   (18,581 )   951     (2,771 )   (4,236 )

(1)
Amounts exclude stock-based compensation. See NOMOS Consolidated Statements of Operations on page F-4.
(2)
Loss on APMG disposition
(3)
Other income (expense) includes expense of $3.0 million in 2000 related to the Med-Tec write-off and income in the year ended December 31, 2003 represents Med-Tec and other litigation settlements
(4)
Represents the operating losses, asset write-offs and additional costs associated with the disposition of ROCS
(5)
Includes accrued but undeclared dividends
(6)
All share and per share information presented reflects a 1 for 1.97 reverse stock split that was effected June 19, 2002
(7)
Amounts in 2002 represent Offering and Relocation costs and amounts in 2003 represent professional fees associated with the planned merger

16


Summary Pro Forma Unaudited Financial Information

        The table below presents selected financial data from the NASI and NOMOS unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated financial statements for the combined company. The unaudited pro forma condensed combined consolidated balance sheet as of January 31, 2004 combines the historical consolidated balance sheets of NASI as of January 31, 2004 and NOMOS as of December 31, 2003, giving effect to the merger as if it occurred on January 31, 2004. The unaudited pro forma condensed combined consolidated statement of operations for the year ended October 31, 2003 and for the three months ended January 31, 2004 combines the historical consolidated statements of operations of NASI and NOMOS for the year ended October 31, 2003 and twelve months ended September 30, 2003, respectively, and the three months ended January 31, 2004 and the three months ended December 31, 2003, respectively, giving effect to the merger as if it occurred on November 1, 2002, reflecting only pro forma adjustments expected to have a continuing impact on the combined results. The unaudited pro forma condensed combined consolidated financial data is not necessarily indicative of the financial position or operating results that would have been achieved had the merger been consummated as of the dates indicated, nor is it necessarily indicative of future financial position or operating results. This information should be read in conjunction with the unaudited pro forma condensed combined consolidated financial statements and related notes and the historical financial statements and related notes of NASI and NOMOS included in, or incorporated by reference into, this joint proxy statement/prospectus.

 
  Pro Forma Combined
 
 
  Year Ended
October 31, 2003

  Three Months
Ended
January 31, 2004

 
 
  (In thousands, except
per share data)

 
Consolidated Statement of Operations Data:              
Revenues   $ 45,710   $ 9,603  
Cost of revenue     21,678     5,375  
   
 
 
  Gross profit     24,032     4,228  
Operating expenses:              
  Selling, general and administrative     24,328     8,520  
  Research and development     13,807     3,131  
   
 
 
    Total operating expenses     38,135     11,651  
   
 
 
Loss from operations     (14,103 )   (7,423 )
Interest and other income, net     3,388     203  
   
 
 
Loss before provision for income taxes     (10,715 )   (7,220 )
Provision for income taxes          
   
 
 
Loss from continuing operations   $ (10,715 ) $ (7,220 )
   
 
 
Basic and diluted net loss per share   $ (0.69 ) $ (0.46 )
   
 
 
Shares used in basic and diluted per share calculation     15,526     15,551  
   
 
 

 


 

Pro Forma Combined
As of January 31, 2004

 
  (In thousands)

Consolidated Balance Sheet Data:      
Cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities   $ 35,816
Cash held in variable interest entity     308
Working capital     18,997
Total assets     100,541
Total debt    
Total stockholders' equity     82,194

17


Comparative Per Share Information

        The capital stock of NOMOS is not publicly traded and no reliable market value information on its capital stock is available. The following table presents (1) audited loss per share and net book value per share for NASI on a historical basis for the year ended October 31, 2003 and unaudited loss per share and net book value per share data for NASI on a historical basis for the three months ended January 31, 2004, (2) loss per share and net book value per share for NOMOS which have been derived from its audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2003, (3) unaudited loss per share and net book value per share for the combined company on a pro forma basis and (4) unaudited loss per share and net book value per share for NOMOS equivalent shares on a pro forma basis. The unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated financial data for the combined company is not necessarily indicative of the financial position had the merger been consummated on October 31, 2003 or January 31, 2004 or operating results that would have been achieved by the combined company had the merger been consummated as of November 1, 2002, and should not be construed as representative of future financial position or operating results. The pro forma condensed combined consolidated per common share data presented below have been derived from unaudited pro forma condensed combined consolidated financial statements included in this joint proxy statement/ prospectus.

        This information is only a summary and should be read in conjunction with the summary historical financial data of NASI and NOMOS, the NASI and NOMOS unaudited pro forma condensed combined consolidated financial statements, and the separate historical financial statements of NASI and NOMOS and related notes included in or incorporated by reference into this joint proxy statement/prospectus.


NASI Per Share Data

 
  NASI
 
 
  Year Ended
October 31, 2003

  Three Months Ended
January 31, 2004

 
 
   
  (unaudited)

 
Historical per common share data:              
  Loss per share(1)   $ (0.89 ) $ (0.38 )
  Net book value per share(2)   $ 5.42   $ 5.09  


NOMOS Per Share Data

 
  NOMOS
 
 
  Year Ended
December 31, 2003

 
Historical per common share data(3):        
  Loss per share   $ (1.07 )
  Net book value (deficit) per share(2)   $ (1.17 )


Combined Organization Pro Forma Per Share Data

 
  Pro Forma
 
 
  Year Ended
October 31, 2003

  Three Months Ended
January 31, 2004

 
Pro forma condensed combined consolidated per common share data:              
  Loss per share   $ (0.69 ) $ (0.46 )
  Net book value per combined company share(2)   $ 5.50   $ 5.29  

18



NOMOS Equivalent Pro Forma Per Share Data(4)

 
  NOMOS
 
 
  Twelve Months Ended
October 31, 2003

  Three Months Ended
January 31, 2003

 
  Loss per equivalent NOMOS share   $ (0.50 ) $ (0.34 )
  Net book value per equivalent NOMOS share   $ 4.02   $ 3.86  

(1)
Net loss per share for the year ended October 31, 2003 excludes the cumulative effect of an accounting change.

(2)
The historical net book value (deficit) per share of NASI common stock and NOMOS common stock is computed by dividing common stockholders' equity (deficit) at period end by the number of shares of common stock outstanding at the respective period end. The pro forma net book value per combined company's share is computed by dividing the pro forma common stockholders' equity by the pro forma number of shares of NASI common stock outstanding at the respective period end, assuming the merger had been consummated on that date.

(3)
As discussed in the Pro Forma Financial Data, the unaudited pro forma condensed combined balance sheet as of January 31, 2004, combines the historical consolidated balance sheets of NASI as of January 31, 2004 and NOMOS as of December 31, 2003, giving effect of the merger as if it occurred on January 31, 2004. The unaudited pro forma condensed combined statements of operations for the (a) fiscal year ended October 31, 2003 combines the historical consolidated statements of operations of NASI for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2003 and NOMOS for the twelve months ended September 30, 2003 and (b) the three months ended January 31, 2004 combines the historical consolidated statements of operations of NASI for the three months ended January 31, 2004 and NOMOS for the three months ended December 31, 2003, giving effect to the merger as if it occurred on November 1, 2002. The NOMOS historical net earnings (loss) per common share used in the Combined Organization Pro Forma Per Share Data for the year ended October 31, 2003 and the three months ended January 31, 2004 were $0.15 and ($0.76), respectively. These per share NOMOS figures were for the twelve months ended September 30, 2003 and the three months ended December 31, 2003, respectively, and were calculated by dividing the unaudited income (loss), before cumulative effect of change in accounting principle, for each respective period by NOMOS' weighted average outstanding shares for each respective period. These NOMOS earnings (loss) per share figures do not reflect any reduction to account for dividends accrued on NOMOS' series C preferred stock.

(4)
The pro forma loss per equivalent NOMOS share and net book value per equivalent NOMOS share was calculated by multiplying the unaudited Combined Organization Pro Forma Per Share Data per share amounts by a blended exchange ratio of 0.731. This blended exchange ratio of 0.731 was obtained by dividing (A) 5,268,097 (the estimated number of shares of NASI common stock into which all of the shares of NOMOS common stock and preferred stock outstanding as of March 10, 2004 would be convertible in the merger, excluding cash consideration payable to holders of preferred stock) by (B) 7,205,585 (the actual number of shares of NOMOS common stock and preferred stock outstanding as of March 10, 2004.

19


Comparative Per Share Market Price Data

        NASI common stock is listed on the Nasdaq National Market under the symbol "NASI". There is no established trading market for NOMOS' capital stock. Neither NASI nor NOMOS has ever declared or paid any cash dividends on its common stock. The following table sets forth, for the fiscal quarters indicated, based on published financial sources, the high and low sales prices per share of NASI common stock as reported on the Nasdaq National Market:

 
  NASI Common Stock
 
  High
  Low
Fiscal 2001            
  First quarter   $ 26.88   $ 10.63
  Second quarter     14.00     6.13
  Third quarter     19.27     12.00
  Fourth quarter     15.45     8.37

Fiscal 2002

 

 

 

 

 

 
  First quarter   $ 16.90   $ 8.73
  Second quarter     13.99     10.07
  Third quarter     14.00     9.00
  Fourth quarter     11.20     7.06

Fiscal 2003

 

 

 

 

 

 
  First quarter   $ 9.77   $ 7.26
  Second quarter     8.05     6.25
  Third quarter     9.00     6.62
  Fourth quarter     11.24     6.80

Fiscal 2004

 

 

 

 

 

 
  First quarter   $ 12.24   $ 7.00

Recent Closing Prices

        The following table sets forth the high and low sales prices per share of NASI common stock as reported on the Nasdaq National Market on October 24, 2003, the last full trading day prior to the announcement of the signing of the merger agreement, and March     , 2004, the most recent practicable date prior to the mailing of this joint proxy statement/prospectus to NASI and NOMOS stockholders. There is no established trading market for NOMOS' capital stock.

 
  NASI Common Stock
Date

  High
  Low
October 24, 2003   $ 7.47   $ 6.85
March     , 2004     [      ]     [      ]

20



RISK FACTORS

        In addition to the other information included in this joint proxy statement/prospectus, including the matters addressed in "Cautionary Statement Concerning Forward-Looking Statements," you should consider carefully the following risks before voting at your special meeting. The merger involves a high degree of risk for NASI and NOMOS stockholders. NOMOS stockholders will be choosing to invest in NASI common stock by voting in favor of the approval of the merger agreement, the proposed merger and the other transactions contemplated by the merger agreement. You should read and consider the risks and uncertainties associated with each of the businesses of NASI and NOMOS because these risks also will affect the combined company after the merger. Some of the risks and uncertainties associated with the business of NASI can be found in NASI's annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2003, which is filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and incorporated by reference in this joint proxy statement/prospectus. Although we believe that the risks described below, in NASI's Form 10-K and in the other documents incorporated by reference into this document represent all material risks currently applicable to the companies and the transaction, additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to NASI and NOMOS or that currently are not believed to be important to NASI and NOMOS also may affect adversely the merger and NASI following the merger.


Risks Relating to the Merger

We may be unable to integrate our operations successfully and realize all of the anticipated benefits of the merger.

        The merger involves the integration of two companies that previously have operated independently, which is a complex, costly and time-consuming process. The difficulties of combining the companies' operations include, among other things:

        The process of integrating operations could cause an interruption of, or loss of momentum in, the activities of the combined company's business and the loss of key personnel. The diversion of management's attention and any delays or difficulties encountered in connection with the merger and the integration of the two companies' operations could harm the business, results of operations, financial condition or prospects of the combined company after the merger. NASI and NOMOS have had ongoing discussions regarding the integration of the two companies following the merger and anticipate, based on these discussions, that the predominant portion of the general integration should be complete within nine months after the completion of the merger. The actual integration may result in additional and unforeseen expenses, and the anticipated benefits of such integration plans may not be realized.

        Among the factors considered by the boards of directors of NASI and NOMOS in connection with their approvals of the merger agreement were the opportunities for cost savings from operating efficiencies that could result from the merger. There can be no assurance that these savings will be

21



realized within the time periods contemplated or that they will be realized at all or that the integration of NASI and NOMOS will result in the realization of the other benefits anticipated by the companies to result from the merger.

The value of common stock of NASI to be received by NOMOS stockholders in the merger will fluctuate prior to the consummation of the merger.

        The number of shares of common stock of NASI issued in the merger for each share of NOMOS stock is fixed. The market price of NASI common stock when the merger is consummated may vary from its market price on the date of this joint proxy statement/prospectus and on the date of the special meetings of the stockholders of NASI and NOMOS. For example, during the 12-month period ended on                        , 2004, the most recent practical date prior to the mailing of this joint proxy statement/prospectus, the low and high bid prices for NASI common stock ranged from $                      to $                      . See "Comparative Per Share Market Price" for more detailed share price information.

        Future variations in the price of NASI's common stock may be the result of various factors including:

        The merger consideration to be received by NOMOS stockholders will not be adjusted for any increase or decrease in the market price of NASI common stock. If the market value of NASI common stock declines prior to the time the merger is consummated, the value of the merger consideration to be received by NOMOS stockholders will decline. In addition, the merger may not be consummated until a significant period of time has passed after the special meetings of the stockholders of NASI and NOMOS. If the market value of NASI common stock increases prior to the time the merger is consummated, the value of the merger consideration to be paid by NASI to NOMOS stockholders will increase. At the time of their special meetings, NASI and NOMOS stockholders will not know the exact value of the shares of common stock of NASI that will be issued in connection with the merger.

        Stockholders of NASI and NOMOS are urged to obtain current market quotations for NASI common stock before voting their shares at the special meetings. NOMOS stockholders should view this transaction as an investment in the equity of the combined company, with the fluctuations in value that are normally associated with publicly traded equity securities.

The market price of NASI common stock may decline as a result of the merger.

        The market price of NASI's common stock may decline as a result of the merger for a number of reasons, including if:

22


There may be sales of substantial numbers of shares of NASI common stock after the merger, which could cause NASI's stock price to fall.

        A large number of shares of NASI common stock to be received by NOMOS stockholders may be sold into the public market within short periods of time at various dates following the consummation of the merger. As a result, NASI's stock price could fall. Of the approximately 5.3 million shares of NASI common stock expected to be issued in connection with the merger, approximately 27% of such shares will be immediately available for resale by former stockholders of NOMOS and approximately 73% of such shares will be subject to "lock-up agreements" that restrict the timing of the resale of these shares and escrow arrangements. Under the lock-up agreements, shares will be released and available for sale in the public market six, 12 or 18 months (depending on the terms of the particular lock-up agreement) after the consummation of the merger. While Rule 145 under the Securities Act may impose some limitations on the number of shares certain NOMOS stockholders may sell, sales of a large number of newly released shares of NASI common stock could occur, which could result in a sharp decline in NASI's stock price. In addition, the sale of these shares could impair the combined company's ability to raise capital through the sale of additional stock. NOMOS executive officers and directors currently own in the aggregate (i) 4,191,769 shares of NOMOS common stock (on an as-converted-to-common stock basis) and (ii) options to purchase 1,198,773 shares of common stock. NOMOS executive officers and directors do not currently own any warrants to purchase NOMOS common stock. After the merger, former executive officers and directors of NOMOS will own in the aggregate approximately (i) 3,073,385 shares of NASI common stock and (ii) options to purchase 1,068,107 shares of NASI common stock. Former executive officers and directors of NOMOS will not own any warrants to purchase NASI common stock immediately following the merger. NASI executive officers and directors currently beneficially own in the aggregate 1,858,472 shares of NASI common stock which includes options to purchase 988,005 shares of NASI common stock. After the merger, the executive officers and directors of NASI (including the executive officer and directors of NOMOS that will join NASI) will beneficially own in the aggregate approximately 4,709,098 shares of NASI common stock which includes options to purchase 1,508,069 shares of NASI common stock. See the sections entitled "Related Agreements—Lock-Up Agreements", "Information Relating to NOMOS—Beneficial Ownership of Capital Stock of NOMOS" and "Information Relating to NASI—Beneficial Ownership of Capital Stock of NASI".

NASI and NOMOS expect to incur significant costs associated with the merger.

        NASI estimates that it will incur direct transaction costs of approximately $2.7 million associated with the merger, which will be included as a part of the total purchase cost for accounting purposes. In addition, NOMOS estimates that it will incur direct transaction costs of approximately $2.4 million that will be expensed as incurred. NASI and NOMOS believe the combined company will incur charges to operations, which they cannot currently reasonably estimate, in the quarter in which the merger is consummated or in subsequent quarters to reflect costs associated with integrating the two companies. The combined company might incur additional merger charges in subsequent periods having a material adverse effect on the combined company's financial position, results of operations or liquidity.

The merger may result in loss of key employees. If we are unable to attract and retain qualified employees, we may be unable to meet our growth and revenue needs.

        Despite the efforts of NASI and NOMOS to retain key employees, the combined company might lose some key employees following the merger. The success of the combined company will be materially dependent on its key employees, and, in particular, the continued services of L. Michael Cutrer, who will serve as the combined company's president and chief executive officer, Erik Johnson,

23



who will serve as the combined company's interim chief financial officer and chief accounting officer and John W. Manzetti, who will serve as the president of NOMOS Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary of NASI after the merger. NASI carries key employee insurance for Mr. Cutrer in the amount of $2.5 million. The combined company's future business and financial results could be adversely affected if the services of Messrs Cutrer, Johnson and Manzetti or other key employees cease to be available. Competitors and other companies may recruit employees prior to the merger and during the integration process following the consummation of the merger. In addition, any real or perceived differences in the policies, career prospects, compensation levels or cultures of NASI and NOMOS may cause key employees to leave. As a result, employees could leave with little or no prior notice, which could cause delays and disruptions in the effort to integrate the two companies and result in expenses associated with finding replacement employees. To date, we have not had any problems in retaining or attracting key personnel. To NASI's knowledge, none of the key employees of the combined company has any plans to retire or leave the combined company in the near future.

        Our future success and ability to grow our business will depend in part on the continued service of our skilled personnel and our ability to identify, hire and retain additional qualified personnel. Although all employees are bound by a limited non-competition agreement that they sign upon employment, few of our employees are bound by employment contracts, and it is difficult to find qualified personnel, particularly medical physicists and customer service personnel, who are willing to travel extensively. We compete for qualified personnel with medical equipment manufacturers, universities and research institutions. Because the competition for these personnel is intense, costs related to compensation may increase significantly.

        Even when we are able to hire a qualified medical physicist, engineer or other technical person, there is a significant training period of up to several months before that person is fully capable of performing the functions we need. This could limit our ability to expand our business.

Certain officers and directors of NOMOS have conflicts of interest that may have influenced them to support or approve the merger.

        The directors and executive officers of NOMOS have interests in the merger that are different from, or in addition to, those of other NOMOS stockholders and NASI stockholders. These include the following:

24


        In addition, as a condition to NASI's willingness to enter into the merger agreement, Mr. Friede entered into a voting agreement and executed irrevocable proxies with respect to NOMOS capital stock and NASI capital stock subject to the voting agreement and entered into a voting trust in connection with the voting agreement. By entering into the voting agreement, Mr. Friede has agreed to vote certain shares beneficially owned by him, representing approximately 41% of the voting power of the NOMOS common stock and preferred stock voting together on an as-converted-to-common stock basis outstanding as of the record date, in favor of the proposal to approve the merger agreement, the proposed merger and the other transactions contemplated by the merger agreement. For more information on these different interests, see the section entitled "Interest of Certain Persons in the Merger".

        As a result of these interests that are different from those of other NOMOS stockholders, the directors and executive officers of NOMOS may have been more likely to vote to approve (and recommend that stockholders vote to approve) the merger agreement and the merger than if they did not have these interests. NOMOS stockholders should consider whether these interests may have influenced these directors and executive officers to support or recommend the merger. You may read more about these interests as described under "The Merger Agreement—Interests of Directors and Executive Officers of NOMOS and NASI in the Merger".

The merger agreement requires payment of a termination fee of up to $3 million in certain instances, which could deter a third party from proposing an alternative transaction to the merger.

        Under the terms of the merger agreement, NOMOS may be required to pay NASI a termination fee of $3.0 million, and NASI may be required to pay to NOMOS a termination fee of $1.5 million, if the merger agreement is terminated under certain circumstances. With some exceptions, these circumstances include, among others, (i) situations in which one party has terminated the merger agreement as a result of the withdrawal, modification or change in the recommendation of the other party's board of directors with respect to the merger and (ii) certain other terminations if, prior to the termination, a third party announced an offer or indicated an interest in a transaction involving NOMOS or NASI and, within 12 months of such termination, that party enters into a transaction

25



involving the sale of that party, or the merger of that party, with another company. The effect of this termination fee may discourage competing bidders from presenting proposals to acquire or merge with NASI or NOMOS that, from a financial perspective, might be superior to the terms of the merger. For a more complete description of the termination rights of each party and the termination fees payable under the merger agreement, see "The Merger Agreement—Termination of Merger Agreement" and "—Termination Fee".

Uncertainty regarding the completion of the merger could harm NASI's and NOMOS' businesses.

        Uncertainty regarding the completion of the merger could harm the respective businesses of NASI and NOMOS in a number of ways. Customers and strategic partners may delay or defer decisions concerning either company until the merger is consummated or abandoned. In the event that either NASI or NOMOS elects to seek another merger or business combination, the other party may not be able to find another party willing to pay an equal or greater price than the price to be paid in the merger. During the time that the merger agreement is in effect, both NASI and NOMOS are prohibited from soliciting, initiating, encouraging or entering into certain transactions, such as a merger, sale of assets or other business combination with a party other than NASI or NOMOS, as the case may be. This uncertainty could cause NASI or NOMOS employees to leave their respective employers. In addition, the diversion of management's attention from day-to-day business and the unavoidable disruption to each company's employees and relationships with customers as a result of efforts and uncertainties relating to the anticipated merger may detract from each company's ability to grow revenues and minimize costs, which, in turn may lead to a loss of market position.

Failure to complete the merger could harm NASI's and NOMOS' businesses.

        Failure to complete of the merger could harm the respective businesses of NASI and NOMOS in a number of ways. Many of the transaction costs, including accounting, legal and certain financial advisory fees, must still be paid, without any offsetting benefits from the merger. In addition, under certain circumstances, NASI could be required to pay NOMOS $1.5 million and NOMOS could be required to pay to NASI $3.0 million. If the merger is not completed, the price of NASI common stock may decline to the extent that the current market price of NASI common stock reflects a market assumption that the merger will be completed. Management of each of the companies has focused a significant amount of time and effort on the merger instead of on pursuing other opportunities that could be beneficial to the company.

        In the event that the merger is not completed, NOMOS intends to conduct its business substantially as conducted prior to the signing of the merger agreement, including continuing to try and advance its business, product and services as it has done throughout its history. In addition, if the merger is not completed, NOMOS may consider alternative transactions, including a business combination with a different strategic partner(s) and/or initiating another capital raising transaction, such as an initial public offering, although it has no formal plans to do so at present.

Risks Related to NOMOS and its Industry and the Effects on the Combined Company's Business

        In the following section discussing risk factors facing the business of NOMOS and the combined company following the merger of NASI and NOMOS, references to "we," "us," "our", "ours" and "NOMOS" refer to NASI and its wholly owned subsidiary, NOMOS Corporation, immediately following the merger.

Doctors and hospitals may not adopt NOMOS' products and technologies at levels sufficient to sustain our business or to achieve our desired growth rate.

        Intensity modulated radiation therapy, or IMRT, is a relatively new technology and, to date, NOMOS has attained only limited penetration of the total potential worldwide market. Our future

26



growth and success depends upon creating broad awareness and acceptance of IMRT generally and its products in particular by doctors, hospitals and freestanding clinics, as well as patients. This will require substantial marketing and educational efforts, which will be costly and may not be successful. The target customers for NOMOS' products may not adopt IMRT-based technologies or may adopt them at a rate that is slower than desired. In addition, potential customers who decide to utilize IMRT may choose to purchase competitors' IMRT products. Important factors that will affect our ability to attain broad market acceptance of NOMOS' products include:


        Failure of NOMOS' products to gain broad market acceptance could cause our revenues to decline and our business to suffer.

Currently, NOMOS' products are predominantly used in the treatment of tumors of the prostate, head, neck and spinal cord. If we do not after the consummation of the merger obtain wider acceptance of NOMOS' products to treat other types of cancer, our sales could fail to increase and we could fail to achieve our desired growth rate.

        Currently, NOMOS' products are predominantly used in the treatment of tumors of the prostate, head, neck and spinal cord. Further research, clinical data and years of experience will likely be required before there can be broad acceptance for the use of IMRT treatments for additional types of cancer. Some recognized members of the radiation oncology community have expressed skepticism as to the relative benefits of IMRT treatments other than for limited types of cancer such as prostate cancer, where mortality is closely linked to recurrence of the local tumor. They point out that in many types of cancer, such as breast cancer, mortality is usually a result of metastasis, meaning the expansion of the cancer to other parts of the patient's body, and that eliminating or controlling the growth of the local tumor, which is the goal of IMRT treatments, does little to prevent this from occurring. If IMRT generally, and NOMOS' products in particular, do not become more widely accepted in treating other types of cancer, our sales could fail to increase or could decrease.

There is currently a lack of long-term data regarding the safety and effectiveness of IMRT products and negative data or the continued lack of adequate supporting data could adversely affect market acceptance of NOMOS' products.

        Although NOMOS estimates that its IMRT products have been used to treat thousands of patients worldwide, this is still a statistically small number, and these treatments have primarily involved tumors of the prostate, head, neck and spinal cord. Much of the data produced in current studies using IMRT and NOMOS' products have involved small patient sample sizes, and any positive results of these studies may not be representative of the results that will be achieved in studies involving larger patient sample sizes. If we are unable to obtain additional and more comprehensive clinical studies, or if long-term clinical studies fail to confirm the effectiveness of IMRT or NOMOS' products, our sales could fail to increase or could decrease.

27


        Some theoretical and non-clinical studies, meaning studies that are not based on significant empirical evidence, have suggested that the use of IMRT and potentially NOMOS' products may cause serious negative side effects, such as a risk of induced cancer, as a result of the increased radiation delivered to the patient. At present, not enough time has passed to determine conclusively the long-term side effects. If future clinical studies confirm that these negative side effects occur as a result of IMRT treatments, our sales could fail to grow or could decline. In addition, if it is shown that NOMOS' products cause harmful side effects, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, or FDA, could require us to change NOMOS' product labeling to describe these potential side effects or could even rescind the clearances for NOMOS' products and potentially require a recall of NOMOS' products.

        IMRT, whether using NOMOS' products or those of its competitors, requires a substantial departure from customary quality assurance practices. The complexity and dynamic nature of IMRT deliveries make new demands on patient plan and dose verification. These difficulties and departures from customary practices may impede market acceptance of IMRT in general and NOMOS' products in particular, which could adversely affect our ability to increase our sales of NOMOS' products and achieve our desired growth rate.

IMRT treatments expose patients to increased radiation leakage, which could potentially cause long-term deleterious side effects, including induced cancer.

        In both IMRT and conventional radiation therapy, there is radiation leakage, which means radiation that escapes from the linear accelerator and is absorbed by the patient outside the area of the patient's body being treated. Linear accelerators are the machines that generate the radiation energy beams used in both IMRT and conventional radiation treatment. Leakage occurs at all times when the linear accelerator is producing radiation. In IMRT treatments, the linear accelerator is required to produce radiation for a longer period of time overall as compared to conventional radiation treatments. Also, in IMRT treatments there is additional leakage that is transmitted through or between the leaves of the multileaf collimator itself. As a result, there is an increase in the overall radiation leakage to which the patient is exposed due to the longer periods of radiation delivery.

        The increased radiation leakage associated with IMRT treatments could require additional room shielding to protect clinic personnel. In addition, concerns have been raised by some researchers that the increase in overall radiation leakage to which IMRT patients are exposed may have deleterious long-term effects, including the potential for inducing cancer.

        These same studies suggest that an increase in the long-term risk of induced cancers from IMRT may be possible. The risk, or perceived risk, of induced cancers could slow or prevent expanded use of IMRT to treat additional types of cancers and could even result in decreased usage of IMRT to treat cancers currently treated with IMRT if the increased risk is shown or believed to be significant, which could cause our revenues from NOMOS products to decline and our business to suffer.

If governmental and private third-party payors do not reimburse healthcare providers at favorable rates for use of NOMOS' products, the revenues attributed to NOMOS' products could decline after the consummation of the merger.

        Hospitals and freestanding clinics may be less likely to purchase NOMOS' products if they cannot be assured of receiving favorable reimbursement for treatments using NOMOS' products from third-party payors, such as Medicare, Medicaid and private health insurance plans. Medicare pays hospitals, freestanding clinics and physicians a fixed amount for services using NOMOS' products, regardless of the costs incurred by those providers in furnishing the services. Such providers may perceive the set reimbursement amounts as inadequate to compensate for the costs incurred and thus may be reluctant to furnish the services for which NOMOS' products are designed. Moreover, third-party payors are increasingly challenging the pricing of medical procedures or limiting or prohibiting reimbursement for

28



some services or devices, and we cannot be sure that they will reimburse our customers at levels sufficient to enable us to achieve or maintain sales and price levels for NOMOS' products. There is no uniform policy on reimbursement among third-party payors, and we can provide no assurance that procedures using NOMOS' products will qualify for reimbursement from third-party payors or that reimbursement rates will not be reduced or eliminated. For example, NOMOS has been informed that some private third-party payors regard IMRT as investigational or experimental and do not provide reimbursement for these services at this time. A reduction in or elimination of third-party payor reimbursement for treatments using NOMOS' products would likely have a material adverse effect on our revenues.

        Furthermore, any federal and state efforts to reform government and private healthcare insurance programs could significantly affect the purchase of healthcare services and products in general and demand for NOMOS' products in particular. We are unable to predict whether potential reforms will be enacted, whether other healthcare legislation or regulation affecting the business may be proposed or enacted in the future or what effect any such legislation or regulation would have on our business, financial condition or results of operations.

        The federal Medicare program currently reimburses hospitals and freestanding clinics for IMRT treatments, including treatments using NOMOS' MIMiC and CORVUS products. Medicare reimbursement amounts typically are reviewed and adjusted at least annually. Medicare reimbursement policies are reviewed and revised on an ad hoc basis. Adjustments could be made to these reimbursement policies or amounts, which could result in reduced or no reimbursement for IMRT services. Changes in Medicare reimbursement policies or amounts affecting hospitals and freestanding clinics could negatively affect market demand for NOMOS' products.

        Private third-party payors often adopt Medicare reimbursement policies and payment amounts. As such, Medicare reimbursement policy and payment amount changes concerning NOMOS' IMRT products and its BAT product also could be extended to private third-party payor reimbursement policies and amounts and could affect demand for NOMOS' products in those markets as well.

        Acceptance of NOMOS' products in foreign markets could be affected by the availability of adequate reimbursement or funding, as the case may be, within prevailing healthcare payment systems. Reimbursement, funding and healthcare payment systems vary significantly by country and include both government-sponsored healthcare and private insurance. We can provide no assurance that third-party reimbursement will be made available with respect to treatments using NOMOS' products under any foreign reimbursement system.

        Problems with any of these reimbursement systems that adversely affect demand for NOMOS' products could cause our revenues from NOMOS products to decline and our business to suffer.

We will face intense competition in the sales and marketing of NOMOS' products for the limited funds that hospitals and freestanding clinics have to invest in capital equipment purchases.

        Both large and small hospitals and freestanding clinics in the United States today have limited funds for capital equipment purchases. Even if the doctors at a particular institution support the purchase of one of NOMOS' products, the hospital or clinic administrator may not authorize the necessary funds. Until such time, if ever, that IMRT generally and NOMOS' and other core products specifically become more widely known and accepted, hospitals and freestanding clinics could use their limited funds to buy competing products, including conventional radiation treatment planning and delivery systems, which could adversely affect our ability to increase sales of NOMOS' products and achieve our desired growth rate.

29



One of NOMOS' primary markets is the market for upgrading linear accelerators that do not have IMRT capabilities to provide them with IMRT capabilities. This market will shrink over time, thereby limiting our potential revenues from the upgrading of linear accelerators.

        To date, a majority of NOMOS' revenues from the sale of NOMOS' IMRT products has been derived from the sale of these products to customers who decide to upgrade linear accelerators that do not have IMRT capabilities to enable them to deliver IMRT treatments. Most of these linear accelerators are older models. Selling CORVUS to customers with newer multileaf collimator-equipped linear accelerators can be difficult because these linear accelerators may be offered with IMRT planning software at little or no additional cost. Accordingly, to make a sale, NOMOS often must convince these potential customers that CORVUS is sufficiently superior to the IMRT or conventional radiation treatment planning software products offered by the manufacturer to justify the additional costs of purchase. Selling PEACOCK and MIMiC to potential customers with newer multileaf collimator-equipped linear accelerators is even more difficult because, in addition to the incremental costs of purchase, these potential customers may be reluctant to incur the additional effort required to retrofit the factory installed multileaf collimator with MIMiC. Over time, if more institutions purchase new linear accelerators that are IMRT-equipped or upgrade their older accelerators with technology from us or our competitors, the market for upgrading linear accelerators that do not have IMRT capabilities will shrink and may become saturated, which could adversely affect our sales and limit our potential revenues from NOMOS products.

NOMOS is dependent on its core technologies for future revenues. We cannot assure you that NOMOS' competitors, many of which have greater resources than we have or will have after the merger, will not develop superior technologies or otherwise be able to compete against us more effectively.

        We expect that NOMOS' current core products, including CORVUS, PEACOCK and BAT, will generate a substantial part of our revenues for the foreseeable future. We will need to continue to develop enhancements to these products and improvements on NOMOS' core technologies in order to compete effectively. Rapid change and technological innovation characterize the marketplace for medical products, and NOMOS' competitors could develop technologies that are superior to NOMOS' products or that render such products obsolete. We anticipate that expenditures for research and development will continue to be significant. The domestic and foreign markets for radiation therapy equipment are highly competitive. Many of NOMOS' competitors and potential competitors have substantial installed bases of products and significantly greater financial, research and development, marketing and other resources than we do. Competition may increase as emerging and established companies enter the field. In addition, the marketplace could conclude that the tasks NOMOS' products were designed to perform are no longer elements of a generally accepted treatment regimen. This could result in us having to reduce production volumes or discontinue production of one or more IMRT products.

        NOMOS' single largest competitor in the IMRT market is Varian Medical Systems, Inc. Varian is the largest worldwide manufacturer, in terms of market share, of linear accelerators. Linear accelerators are the machines that generate the radiation energy beams used in both IMRT and conventional radiation treatment. Varian also markets its own line of IMRT products, including several models of multileaf collimators and an IMRT inverse planning software package, which it often includes with its linear accelerators. Varian is also one of the principal providers of record and verification systems, which are systems that keep track of all critical information in the treatment of radiation therapy patients and which allow the planning system to communicate with the linear accelerator. Varian recently acquired Zmed, Inc., one of NOMOS' principal competitors for BAT. Varian expects the acquisition to enhance its 3-D ultrasound imaging capabilities and offer radiation

30



oncology departments a new line of stereotactic positioning accessories and planning software, allowing Varian to directly compete against BAT.

        NOMOS also competes with Siemens Medical Systems, Inc. and Elekta A.B., each of which manufactures one or more multileaf collimators that compete with MIMiC and, therefore, with NOMOS' integrated system, PEACOCK. There are several other companies that currently offer or plan to offer IMRT modules, which typically add IMRT functionality to conventional radiation treatment planning products. Finally, NOMOS competes with all manufacturers of conventional radiation therapy products many of which are devoting substantial resources to promoting their products.

        Because we are a relatively small company, there is a risk that potential customers will purchase products from larger manufacturers, even if NOMOS' products are technically superior, based on the perception that a larger, more established manufacturer may offer greater certainty of continued product improvements, support and service, which could cause our revenues from NOMOS products to decline.

If alternative technologies prove to be superior to IMRT, physician adoption of NOMOS' products could substantially decrease.

        NOMOS' IMRT products face competition from companies that sell conventional radiation therapy products as well as from companies that are developing, marketing and manufacturing alternative therapies to radiation for the treatment of tumorous cancers. Please see "Information Regarding NOMOS—Competition". It is possible that advances in the pharmaceutical, bio-medical or gene-therapy fields could render some or all radiation therapies, whether conventional or based on IMRT obsolete. Even incremental advances in competing technologies could result in the rejection of NOMOS' products as a part of a generally accepted diagnostic or treatment regimen. If alternative therapies are proven or perceived to offer treatment options that are superior or more cost effective than the treatments NOMOS' products provide, physician adoption of NOMOS' products could be negatively affected and our revenues from NOMOS products could decline.

We might not be able to make NOMOS' products compatible with some existing linear accelerators and other radiation therapy products. In addition, any future changes in the configuration of the most common linear accelerators could require costly and time-consuming modifications to NOMOS' products that could harm our business.

        NOMOS' IMRT products are designed to be used in conjunction with most linear accelerators currently in use. NOMOS' products are not currently compatible with all linear accelerators. However, when manufacturers modify the design or functionality of their machines, NOMOS is often required to modify NOMOS' products to ensure compatibility. Future changes cannot be predicted and, in the case of linear accelerator manufacturers who are NOMOS' competitors, could be made or timed to place us at a competitive disadvantage. Responding to these changes can be costly and time-consuming. We could be required to obtain additional regulatory clearances for any modifications of NOMOS' products. It is also possible that, despite our best efforts, we might be unable to make NOMOS' products compatible with new or modified versions of linear accelerators or might only be able to do so at a prohibitive expense.

        NOMOS' PEREGRINE product is not currently fully compatible with linear accelerators that represent a minority of the U.S. market and a majority of the worldwide market. We cannot assure you that we will be successful in making PEREGRINE compatible with these linear accelerators, and any future changes in the design of any linear accelerators could require us to redesign the functionality of PEREGRINE. We may not be successful at any such effort.

31



NOMOS' limited operating history makes evaluating our business and future prospects difficult.

        Although NOMOS has been in existence since 1979, NOMOS has only had significant operations in NOMOS' current markets since 1994, and most of NOMOS' senior management has only been with NOMOS since 1999. In addition, NOMOS went through a significant restructuring in 1999 and 2000. Moreover, three of NOMOS' products and services, BAT, PEREGRINE and NOMOS Rx, have only recently come into the market. This limited operating history may not be adequate to enable you to fully assess our ability to achieve further market acceptance of NOMOS' products and services, to continue to grow our business and to compete effectively.

NOMOS relies on several sole source suppliers and a limited number of other suppliers to provide significant components used in NOMOS' products. A significant interruption in supply could prevent or limit our ability to accept and fill orders for NOMOS' products.

        Although NOMOS performs final product assembly of NOMOS' products, NOMOS purchases all major components from third-party suppliers. NOMOS currently relies on a single source of supply for several key materials and components, the most important of which are the tungsten leaves used in NOMOS' MIMiC multi-leaf collimator and all major components used in NOMOS' BAT targeting system. NOMOS also obtains various other components from a limited number of sources. We cannot produce NOMOS' products without these components. In the event of any extended or recurring interruption in supply, or if any of the significant components to NOMOS' products become obsolete or are no longer manufactured, we could be required to redesign NOMOS' products or seek alternative supply sources, which could significantly impair our ability to sell these products. In some cases, NOMOS expects it would take several months, or longer, for a new supplier to begin providing components to specification. In addition, we could be required to make a new or supplemental filing with the FDA and other applicable regulatory authorities and might have to obtain clearance or other regulatory approvals prior to marketing a product containing new components. We may be unable to obtain the necessary regulatory clearances or approvals on a timely basis, if at all, which could cause our revenues to decline and our business to suffer.

NOMOS depends partially on its relationships with distributors and other industry participants to market NOMOS' products, and if these relationships are discontinued or if we are unable to develop new relationships, our revenues could decline.

        NOMOS currently relies, and will continue to rely, upon collaborative relationships with agents and distributors and other industry participants to maintain market access to potential customers, particularly in Asia and Europe, and our business strategy includes entering into more of these relationships in the future. Some of the entities with whom NOMOS has relationships to help market and distribute its products also produce or distribute products that directly compete with NOMOS' core products.

        We cannot assure you that we will be able to maintain or develop these relationships with agents and distributors and other industry participants or that these relationships will continue to be successful. If any of these relationships is terminated, not renewed or otherwise unsuccessful, or if we are unable to develop additional relationships, NOMOS' product sales could decline, and our ability to grow NOMOS' business could be adversely affected. This is particularly the case with respect to foreign sales of NOMOS' products, where NOMOS currently relies, and we will continue to rely, on NOMOS' distributors' expertise regarding foreign regulatory matters and their access to actual and potential customers.

32



We could be unable to protect NOMOS' patents and other proprietary rights. If we fail to protect NOMOS' intellectual property rights or if NOMOS' intellectual property rights do not adequately cover the technologies we employ or if such intellectual property rights are declared to be invalid, other companies could sell products with features similar to NOMOS' products or we might be forced to discontinue selling NOMOS' products.

        NOMOS relies on U.S. and foreign patents to protect NOMOS' intellectual property. NOMOS also relies on trade secrets and know-how that NOMOS seeks to protect. NOMOS attempts to protect NOMOS' intellectual property rights by filing patent applications for new features and products NOMOS develops. NOMOS enters into confidentiality or license agreements with NOMOS' employees, consultants, independent contractors and corporate partners, and seeks to control access to NOMOS' intellectual property and the distribution of NOMOS' products, documentation and other proprietary information. We plan to continue these methods to protect NOMOS' intellectual property and NOMOS' products. These measures may afford only limited protection. In addition, the laws of some foreign countries may not protect NOMOS' intellectual property rights to the same extent as do the laws of the United States.

        If a competitor infringes upon NOMOS' patent or other intellectual property rights, enforcing those rights could be difficult, expensive and time-consuming. Competitors could also bring actions or counterclaims attempting to invalidate NOMOS' patents. Even if we are successful, litigation to enforce NOMOS' intellectual property rights or to defend NOMOS' patents against challenge could be costly and could divert our management's attention.

        NOMOS is currently involved in a lawsuit, which NOMOS initiated, involving a NOMOS patent relating to the ultrasound localization techniques that is used in BAT. The lawsuit is discussed below in the section entitled "Information Regarding NOMOS—Legal Proceedings". In January 2003, the district court entered judgment against NOMOS on its infringement claims. We appealed this judgment to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. In February 2004, the circuit court upheld the district court's judgment and we filed a petition for rehearing. An adverse result in this lawsuit could hurt our reputation and, therefore, adversely impact sales of our other products.

        Even if we are able to effectively enforce NOMOS' existing proprietary rights to the fullest extent permitted by law, this would not protect us from competition. NOMOS does not have any patent on IMRT delivery or planning generally, and NOMOS has competitors that currently market and sell IMRT planning and delivery products including inverse planning systems similar to NOMOS' CORVUS product. In addition, NOMOS' competitors could design around NOMOS' patents or develop products that provide comparable or superior outcomes without infringing on NOMOS' patents or other proprietary rights. The confidentiality agreements with NOMOS' employees, consultants and other third parties may not be enforceable or may not provide meaningful protection for NOMOS' trade secrets or other proprietary information in the event of unauthorized use or disclosure.

The medical device industry is characterized by competing intellectual property, and we could be sued for violating the intellectual property rights of others.

        The medical device industry is characterized by a substantial amount of litigation over patent and other intellectual property rights. NOMOS' competitors, like companies in many high technology businesses, continually review other companies' products for possible conflicts with their own intellectual property rights. Determining whether a product infringes a patent involves complex legal and factual issues, and the outcome of patent litigation actions is often uncertain. Our competitors could assert that NOMOS' products and the methods we employ in the use of NOMOS' products are covered by United States or foreign patent rights held by them. In addition, because patent applications can take many years to issue, there could be applications now pending of which we are unaware, which could later result in issued patents that NOMOS' products infringe. There could also be existing

33



patents that one or more of NOMOS' products could inadvertently be infringing of which we are unaware. While NOMOS does not believe that any of its products, services or technologies infringe any valid intellectual property rights of third parties, NOMOS may be unaware of third-party intellectual property rights that relate to its products, services or technologies. As the number of competitors in the radiation oncology market grows, and as the number of patents issued in this area grows, the possibility of a patent infringement claim against us and the combined company going forward increases. NOMOS could incur substantial costs and diversion of management resources if we have to assert our patent rights against others. An unfavorable outcome to any litigation could harm us. In addition, NOMOS may not be able to detect infringement or may lose competitive position in the market before we do so.

        To address patent infringement or other intellectual property claims, we may have to enter into license agreements and technology cross-licenses or agree to pay royalties at a substantial cost to us. We may be unable to obtain necessary licenses. A valid claim against us and our failure to obtain a license for the technology at issue could prevent us from selling NOMOS' products and materially adversely affect our business, financial results and future prospects.

We have limited experience producing NOMOS' products in substantial quantities. If we are unable to hire sufficient additional personnel, purchase additional equipment or are otherwise unable to meet customer demand, our business could suffer.

        To be successful, we must produce NOMOS' products in substantial quantities and in compliance with regulatory requirements, at acceptable costs. If we do not succeed in producing quantities of NOMOS' products that will satisfy customer demand, we could lose customers and our business could suffer. We currently have limited experience in assembling and testing NOMOS' products in large quantities. If we increase our production volume and the number of designs for NOMOS' products, the complexity of our production processes will increase. In addition, we could experience short-term surges in production demands resulting from increasing business volume in general, as well as bulk purchases made by one or more of our customers. Because our production operations are primarily dependent upon manual assembly, if demand for NOMOS' products increases, we will need to hire additional personnel and could be required to purchase additional equipment. If we are unable to sufficiently staff our production operations or are otherwise unable to meet customer demand, our business could suffer.

We have limited experience servicing warranties with respect to NOMOS' products and could experience warranty claims that exceed our reserves.

        Each of NOMOS' products comes with a standard twelve-month warranty against defects in materials and workmanship. We are responsible for all claims, actions, damages, liabilities, costs and expenses for defects attributable to these products. NOMOS has established reserves for the liability associated with product warranties. However, we have limited experience servicing NOMOS' product warranties and cannot be sure that such reserves will be adequate to cover all future claims. We have even less experience providing warranty service outside the United States, and NOMOS typically provides this service through, or with the assistance of, foreign agents and distributors. We will need to develop the ability to provide service on a cost-effective basis if we are to be able to expand our foreign business. Although NOMOS believes that it currently has adequate reserves to address anticipated potential liabilities associated with product warranties, any unforeseen warranty exposure could adversely affect our operating results.

34



NOMOS' products are used in connection with the delivery of intense radiation. Defects in, or misuse of, NOMOS' products, or any detrimental side effects that result from the use of NOMOS' products, could result in serious injury or death and could require costly recalls or subject us to costly and time-consuming product liability claims. This could harm future sales and require us to pay substantial damages.

        NOMOS' medical devices are used in connection with the delivery of high-powered external beam radiation to cancer patients. One or more of NOMOS' products could malfunction or be misused and cause serious injury or death to a patient. In addition, NOMOS' products might otherwise be determined to cause serious injury or other detrimental side effects. It is an inherent risk of this industry that NOMOS might be sued in a situation where one of NOMOS' products results in, or is alleged to result in, a personal injury. Although NOMOS believes that it currently has adequate insurance to address anticipated potential liabilities associated with product liability, any unforeseen product liability, exposure in excess of, or outside the scope of, such insurance coverage could adversely affect our operating results. Any such claim brought against us, with or without merit, could result in significant damage to our business. In 2002, NOMOS was named as a defendant, along with treating physicians and several other equipment manufacturers, in a legal action brought by an individual who was treated with our products, alleging that he was mistreated and that our PEACOCK system, along with equipment from several of NOMOS' competitors, was defective, causing him to receive an excessive amount of radiation to areas surrounding his tumor. We refer you to the section entitled "Information Regarding NOMOS—Legal Proceedings" in this joint proxy statement/prospectus.

        The FDA's medical device reporting regulations require us to report any incident in which NOMOS' products may have caused or contributed to a death or serious injury, or in which NOMOS' products malfunctioned in a way that would be likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if the malfunction recurred. NOMOS has not filed any reports with the FDA concerning a death or serious injury involving one of NOMOS' products. Any required filing could result in an investigation of NOMOS' products.

        Because of the nature of NOMOS' products and their use, the tolerance for error in the design, manufacture or use of NOMOS' products may be small or nonexistent. If a product designed or manufactured by NOMOS is defective, whether due to design or manufacturing defects, or improper assembly, use or servicing of the product or other reasons, the product may need to be recalled, possibly at our expense. Furthermore, the adverse effect of a product recall might not be limited to the cost of the recall. For example, a product recall could cause applicable regulatory authorities to investigate us as well as cause our customers to review and potentially terminate their relationships with us. Recalls, especially if accompanied by unfavorable publicity or termination of customer contracts, could cause us to suffer substantial costs, lost revenues and a loss of reputation, each of which could harm our business. Products as complex as NOMOS' planning and dose calculation software systems may also contain undetected software errors or defects when they are first introduced or as new versions are released. NOMOS' products may not be free from errors or defects even after they have been tested, which could result in the rejection of NOMOS' products by our customers and damage to our reputation, as well as lost revenue, diverted development resources and increased support costs. We may also be subject to claims for damages related to any errors in NOMOS' products.

        NOMOS currently maintains product liability insurance, which has deductible amounts and per claim and aggregate limits. However, we cannot assure you that this insurance will continue to be available on terms acceptable to us or in sufficient amounts if at all, or that it will provide adequate coverage in the event that any product liability is actually incurred.

35



If we are unable to complete current developments or to develop new enhancements and new generations of IMRT products, we may be unable to retain NOMOS' existing customers or attract new customers.

        Rapid and significant technological change, evolving industry standards and new product introductions characterize the market for NOMOS' products. Many of NOMOS' products are technologically innovative and require significant planning, design, development and testing. These activities require significant capital commitments and investment on our part.

        New product developments in the healthcare industry are inherently risky and unpredictable. These risks include:

        The high cost of technological innovation is coupled with rapid and significant change in the regulations governing the products that compete in NOMOS' market, by industry standards that could change on short notice, and by the introduction of new products and technologies that could render existing products and technologies uncompetitive. We cannot be sure that we will be able to successfully develop new products or enhancements to NOMOS' existing products. Without successful new product introductions, our revenues will likely suffer. Even if customers accept new or enhanced products, the costs associated with making these products available to customers could reduce or prevent us from increasing our operating margins.

        In addition, although NOMOS' has received FDA 510(k) clearance for its PEREGRINE dose calculation software product, NOMOS' is still in the process of finalizing the development of PEREGRINE in order to allow it to be used clinically to treat patients and to enable it to be used with a broader range of linear accelerators, energy levels with those linear accelerators, and treatment planning systems without the need for extensive commissioning and testing. These final developments are designed primarily to enhance the installation process, as opposed to the underlying software function. NOMOS' has reviewed these changes and does not believe these changes will require any new 510(k) clearances from the FDA. However, the FDA could disagree and require the submission of a 510(k) application. We may encounter problems with the performance or implementation of these developments. An inability to complete these developments on a timely basis could adversely affect our relationship with the early purchasers of PEREGRINE, and could adversely impact our ability to sell PEREGRINE to new customers. Any failure to successfully complete these developments could also hurt our reputation and, therefore, adversely impact sales of other NOMOS' products.

If we do not provide quality customer support and service, we could lose customers and our operating results could suffer.

        Our ability to provide quality support and service to NOMOS' customers and healthcare professionals is critical to our success. To effectively compete, we must continue to build and maintain strong customer support and service and strong brand awareness among NOMOS' customers, much of

36



which is based upon personal referrals and word of mouth. In order to build and maintain brand awareness, we must hire and retain customer support and service personnel who are able to provide NOMOS' customers with answers to questions regarding NOMOS' products. Any failure or disruption of our customer support and service operations could cause us to lose customers and harm our business.

We could begin to face competition for our customer support and services, which could adversely affect our revenues and could lead to the defection of important employees.

        Currently, NOMOS' is the only authorized provider of support and services for NOMOS' products, from which NOMOS' derives a substantial portion of its revenues. Competition to support and service NOMOS' products could increase if and as NOMOS' products become more widely accepted. This could result in a loss of service revenue. In addition, competitors could seek to hire away our customer support and service personnel, which, if successful, could adversely affect our ability to provide product support and services and result in competition for the servicing of our products.

Any failure to build and manage NOMOS' direct sales organization could negatively affect our revenues.

        NOMOS' current domestic direct sales force is small relative to many of its competitors. We plan to expand the size of this sales force and to further develop our sales force outside the United States to further penetrate the domestic and foreign markets for NOMOS' products. There is intense competition for skilled sales and marketing employees, particularly for people who have experience in the radiation oncology market. Accordingly, we could find it difficult to hire or retain skilled individuals to sell NOMOS' products. Any failure to build our direct sales force could adversely affect our growth and our ability to meet our revenue goals.

Our future growth will depend, in part, on our ability to penetrate foreign markets, particularly in Asia and Europe. However, our activities outside the United States will subject us to additional regulatory burdens and other risks.

        Our future profitability will depend in part on our ability to grow and maintain NOMOS' product sales in foreign markets, particularly in Asia and Europe. However, we have limited experience in marketing and servicing NOMOS' products in other countries. In 2003, approximately 2.1% of NOMOS' product revenues and 1.6% of NOMOS' total revenues were derived from sales to customers outside the United States and Canada. NOMOS' foreign operations will subject us to additional risks and uncertainties, including:

37


        Our foreign sales of NOMOS' products could also be adversely affected by export license requirements, the imposition of governmental controls, political and economic instability, trade restrictions, changes in tariffs and difficulties in staffing and managing foreign operations.

Complying with FDA and other domestic and foreign regulations is an expensive and time-consuming process, which can result in the delay or cancellation of product introductions or modifications. Any failure to comply with these regulations could result in substantial penalties and prevent us from marketing NOMOS' products.

        NOMOS and some of its suppliers are subject to a host of federal, state, local and foreign laws and regulations regarding the manufacture and marketing of NOMOS' products. Compliance with these regulations is expensive and time-consuming.

        NOMOS' products, research and development activities, and marketing and manufacturing practices and those of some of its suppliers are subject to regulation by the FDA pursuant to the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act and its implementing regulations. Under this act and its implementing regulations, the FDA regulates, among other things, the preclinical and clinical testing, manufacturing, assembly, safety and efficacy, labeling, distribution, promotion, sale and use of medical devices in the United States. Our products are regulated under this act as medical devices.

        In the United States, medical devices are classified into three different categories, over which the FDA applies increasing levels of regulation: Class I, Class II, and Class III. The FDA has classified all of NOMOS' products to date as Class II devices. Before a new device can be introduced into the United States market, the manufacturer must obtain FDA clearance or approval through either a 510(k) premarket notification or a premarket approval, unless the product is otherwise exempt from the requirements. Class I devices are statutorily exempt from the 510(k) process, unless the device is intended for a use which is of substantial importance in preventing impairment of human health or it presents a potential unreasonable risk of illness or injury.

        A 510(k) premarket notification clearance will typically be granted for a device that is substantially equivalent to a legally marketed Class I or Class II medical device or a Class III medical device for which the FDA has not yet required submission of a premarket approval. A 510(k) premarket notification must contain information supporting the claim of substantial equivalence, which may include laboratory results or the results of clinical studies. Following submission of a 510(k), a company may not market the device for clinical use until the FDA finds the product is substantially equivalent for a specific or general intended use. FDA clearance generally takes from four to twelve months, but it may take longer, and there is no assurance that the FDA will ultimately grant a clearance. The FDA may determine that a device is not substantially equivalent and require submission and approval of a premarket approval or require further information before it is able to make a determination regarding substantial equivalence.

        All of the products that NOMOS is currently marketing have received clearances from the FDA through the 510(k) premarket notification process. For any devices already cleared through the 510(k) process, modifications or enhancements that could significantly affect safety or effectiveness, or constitute a major change in intended use require a new 510(k) submission and a separate FDA determination of substantial equivalence. NOMOS has made minor modifications to its products and, using the guidelines established by the FDA, has determined that these modifications do not require us to file new 510(k) submissions. If the FDA disagrees with NOMOS' determinations, we may not be able to sell one or more of NOMOS' products until the FDA has cleared new 510(k) submissions for these modifications, and there is no assurance that the FDA will ultimately grant a clearance. In addition, the FDA may determine that future products require the more costly, lengthy and uncertain premarket approval process under Section 515 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act. The approval process under Section 515 generally takes from one to three years, but in many cases can take

38



even longer, and there can be no assurance that any approval will be granted on a timely basis, if at all. Under the premarket approval process, an applicant must generally conduct at least one clinical investigation and submit extensive supporting data and clinical information establishing the safety and effectiveness of the device, as well as extensive manufacturing information. Clinical investigations themselves are typically lengthy and expensive, closely regulated and frequently require prior FDA clearance. Even if clinical investigations are conducted, there is no assurance that they will support the claims for the product. If the FDA requires us to submit a new premarket notification under Section 510(k) for modifications to NOMOS' existing products, or if the FDA requires us to go through the lengthier, more rigorous Section 515 premarket approval process, NOMOS' product introductions or modifications could be delayed or cancelled, which could cause our revenues to be below expectations.

        NOMOS' manufacturing operations are required to comply with the FDA's quality system regulation, which incorporates the FDA's former current good manufacturing practices. The FDA's quality system regulation addresses the design, controls, methods, facilities and quality assurance controls used in manufacturing, assembly, packing, storing and installing medical devices. There can be no assurance that we will not incur significant costs to comply with these regulations in the future or that the regulations will not have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Our compliance and the compliance by some of NOMOS' suppliers with applicable regulatory requirements is and will continue to be monitored through periodic inspections by the FDA.

        If we or any of NOMOS' suppliers fail to comply with FDA requirements, the FDA can institute a wide variety of enforcement actions, ranging from a public warning letter to more severe sanctions such as:

        Similar consequences could arise from our failure, or the failure by any of NOMOS' suppliers, to comply with applicable foreign laws and regulations. Foreign regulatory requirements vary by country. In general, NOMOS' products are regulated outside the United States as medical devices by foreign governmental agencies similar to the FDA. However, the time and cost required to obtain regulatory approvals from foreign countries could be longer than that required for FDA clearance and the requirements for licensing a product in another country may differ significantly from the FDA requirements. We rely, in part, on our foreign distributors to assist us in complying with foreign regulatory requirements. We may not be able to obtain these approvals without incurring significant expenses or at all, and the failure to obtain these approvals would prevent us from selling NOMOS' products in the applicable countries. This could limit our sales and growth.

39



NASI is subject to certain anti-takeover provisions that could have the effect of discouraging, preventing or delaying a change of control of the combined company. NOMOS stockholders, as stockholders in the combined company, will be subject to certain of these provisions which they would otherwise not be subject to as stockholders of NOMOS.

        NASI has certain anti-takeover provisions in its governing documents that provide for, among other things:

        These anti-takeover provisions may have the effect of discouraging, delaying or preventing a change in control of the combined company following the merger or unsolicited acquisition proposals that stockholders may consider favorable. These provisions may have these effects even though the potential acquiror might be willing to pay a premium above the then prevailing market price for NASI's common stock and the acquisition might be favored by a majority of NASI's stockholders. Furthermore, because these anti-takeover provisions could make it more difficult for a stockholder or a third party to acquire a controlling interest in the combined company, this could make it difficult for stockholders to change the composition of the board of directors or management of the combined company.

        NOMOS is not currently subject to the types of anti-takeover provisions in NASI's stockholder rights plan. NOMOS stockholders, as stockholders in the combined company, will be subject to these provisions following the merger. We refer you to "Description of NASI's Capital Stock—Certain Anti-Takeover Effects of Provisions of the Certificate of Incorporation, Bylaws and Delaware Law".

40



CAUTIONARY STATEMENT CONCERNING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

        This joint proxy statement/prospectus and the other documents incorporated by reference into this joint proxy statement/prospectus contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Statements in this joint proxy statement/prospectus and the other documents incorporated into this joint proxy statement/prospectus by reference that are not historical facts are identified as "forward-looking statements" for the purpose of the safe harbor provided by Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or the Exchange Act, and Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, or the Securities Act. Forward-looking statements include projections, assumptions or information concerning possible or assumed future actions, events or results of operations of NASI, NOMOS or the combined company. These statements involve estimates and assumptions based on the judgment of each company's management. A number of risks and uncertainties may cause actual results to differ materially from those suggested by the forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements include the information in this joint proxy statement/prospectus and the other documents incorporated by reference into this joint proxy statement/prospectus regarding:

        These statements may be preceded by, followed by or include the words "believes," "expects," "anticipates," "intends," "plans," "estimates" or similar expressions. We claim the protection of the safe harbor for forward-looking statements contained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 for all forward-looking statements. We do not undertake any obligation to publicly update any forward-looking statements to reflect subsequent events or circumstances.

41



THE PROPOSED MERGER

        The following is a description of the material aspects of the merger. The following discussion is a summary only and may not contain all of the information that is important to you. We encourage you to read carefully this entire joint proxy statement/prospectus, including the merger agreement, as amended, included as Annex A-1, Annex A-2 and Annex A-3 to this joint proxy statement/prospectus, for a more complete understanding of the merger. References throughout this joint proxy statement/prospectus to the merger agreement shall mean the merger agreement as amended by the first amendment and the second amendment as discussed in the section entitled "The Merger Agreement—Amendments, Extensions and Waivers".

General

        Each of NASI's and NOMOS' board of directors unanimously has approved the merger agreement. At the effective time of the merger, NOMOS will be merged with and into AM Capital I, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of NASI. AM Capital I, Inc. will be the surviving corporation and will change its name immediately following the merger to "NOMOS Corporation".

        If the merger is consummated, NOMOS stockholders will receive 0.891 shares of NASI common stock for each share of NOMOS common stock they hold, approximately 1.212 shares of NASI common stock for each share of NOMOS series A preferred stock they hold, 0.603 shares of NASI common stock and $2.15 per share in cash for each share of NOMOS series B preferred stock they hold, and 0.340 shares of NASI common stock and $5.99 per share in cash for each share of NOMOS series C preferred stock they hold, plus in each case cash in lieu of fractional shares.

        NASI's board of directors is using this joint proxy statement/prospectus to solicit proxies from the holders of NASI common stock for use at NASI's special meeting to be held to approve the merger agreement and the proposed merger, to approve the issuance of NASI common stock in the merger and the other transactions contemplated by the merger agreement. NOMOS' board of directors is using this document to solicit proxies from the holders of NOMOS stock for use at NOMOS' special meeting to be held to approve the merger agreement, the proposed merger and the other transactions contemplated by the merger agreement.

NASI's Proposals

        At NASI's special meeting, holders of NASI common stock are being asked to vote:

        THE MERGER WILL NOT BE CONSUMMATED UNLESS NASI STOCKHOLDERS APPROVE THE MERGER AGREEMENT, THE PROPOSED MERGER, THE ISSUANCE OF THE SHARES OF NASI COMMON STOCK IN THE MERGER AND THE OTHER TRANSACTIONS CONTEMPLATED BY THE MERGER AGREEMENT AND THE AMENDMENT TO THE AMENDED AND RESTATED 1996 STOCK OPTION PLAN TO

42



PERMIT THE ISSUANCE OF REPLACEMENT OPTIONS IN CONNECTION WITH A MERGER OR CONSOLIDATION.

        THE APPROVAL OF THE AMENDMENT TO THE AMENDED AND RESTATED 1996 STOCK OPTION PLAN TO PERMIT THE MAXIMUM NUMBER OF SHARES AVAILABLE FOR ISSUANCE UNDER THE PLAN FROM 4,000,000 TO 4,600,000 IS NOT REQUIRED TO EFFECT THE PROPOSED MERGER.

NOMOS' Proposals

        At NOMOS' special meeting, NOMOS stockholders are being asked to vote:

Each of the above proposals will be submitted to a vote of all of NOMOS' outstanding shares of stock (excluding shares held in treasury), voting together as a single class on an as-converted-to-common stock basis.

        THE MERGER WILL NOT BE CONSUMMATED UNLESS THE REQUISITE NOMOS STOCKHOLDERS APPROVE THE MERGER AGREEMENT, THE PROPOSED MERGER AND THE OTHER TRANSACTIONS CONTEMPLATED BY THE MERGER AGREEMENT.

Background of the Merger

        The managements of NASI and NOMOS continually review their options for achieving long-term strategic goals and enhancing stockholder value including marketing and development alliances, opportunities for mergers with other companies and acquisitions.

        In late 2001, NOMOS began exploring opportunities to raise capital and, if possible, provide some liquidity to its stockholders. In the spring and summer of 2002, NOMOS prepared and filed a registration statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission relating to an initial public offering of NOMOS common stock. This initial public offering did not close (and no shares of NOMOS common stock were sold) primarily as a result of the depressed capital markets that existed throughout 2002.

        In the spring of 2003, NOMOS began to evaluate additional financing options to fuel its growth, including business combinations with strategic partners and the sale of its business.

        At a meeting of the NOMOS board of directors held in New York on May 21, 2003, the board members discussed the strategic position, financing requirements, competitive position and near-term economic expectations of NOMOS. After significant discussions, the board of directors instructed John W. Manzetti, president and chief executive officer of NOMOS, to contact investment banking firms in an effort to obtain assistance in exploring strategic financing alternatives.

        On June 4, 2003, Mr. Manzetti arranged a meeting in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania with a representative of CIBC World Markets, one of the underwriters for NOMOS' planned initial public offering in 2002. At this meeting, CIBC World Markets first began to discuss NASI, which at the time also had a relationship with CIBC World Markets, and whether a transaction between NOMOS and NASI would create value-enhancing opportunities for the two companies and their stockholders. CIBC World Markets, after a discussion with Mr. Manzetti, invited L. Michael Cutrer, NASI's president and chief executive officer, to visit NOMOS for business discussions, and a meeting was arranged between

43



NASI and NOMOS for the following week which included Mr. Cutrer and Alan Edrick, NASI's former senior vice president and chief financial officer. Prior to these discussions, there had been no discussions, and no previous business relationship, between NASI and NOMOS.

        During the second week of June 2003, NASI and NOMOS signed a non-disclosure agreement.

        On June 12, 2003, Mr. Cutrer and Mr. Edrick met with the NOMOS senior management team, including Mr. Manzetti, David J. Haffner, chief financial officer, and William W. Wells, executive vice president of sales, marketing and business development, at NOMOS' headquarters in Cranberry Township, Pennsylvania. At this meeting, the representatives from NASI were given a tour of NOMOS' offices and production facilities. They were also given a presentation on NOMOS' business, including its products, sales, manufacturing and finances. After the meeting, the parties agreed to continue discussions regarding a potential business combination.

        At a regularly scheduled meeting of NASI's board of directors in Boston on June 12, 2003, NASI management reported to the board of directors on NOMOS as a potential merger partner and on NOMOS' business and financial position. After discussion, the NASI board of directors authorized senior management to further explore the possibility of a business combination transaction with NOMOS.

        During the following two weeks, Mr. Manzetti met with various investment banking firms, of which six firms, including CIBC World Markets, were invited to present proposals to NOMOS' board of directors regarding their ability to assist NOMOS in exploring strategic financing alternatives, business combinations or sale opportunities.

        On June 23, 2003, Mr. Cutrer and Mr. Edrick arranged and telephonically advised the NASI board of directors of their plans to make a presentation to the NOMOS board of directors in New York on June 26, 2003. After discussion, the NASI board of directors approved the continuation of discussions with NOMOS.

        On June 26, 2003, NASI, at the invitation of Mr. Manzetti, met with NOMOS' board of directors in New York to discuss a potential business combination with NOMOS, the business of NASI and potential strategic benefits of combining the companies. Mr. Cutrer, Mr. Edrick and Dr. Allan Green, NASI's chief technology officer, explained NASI's business to the NOMOS board of directors. Mr. Cutrer discussed the broad terms of a possible transaction to be potentially structured as a merger, including a potential preliminary valuation of NOMOS in the $60-80 million range and payment consideration primarily in NASI common stock, but potentially including a cash component. After the meeting, the NOMOS board of directors indicated that NOMOS would get back to NASI's management after the board's review and discussion.

        After interviewing the six invited investment banking firms, the NOMOS board of directors decided to retain CIBC World Markets to assist NOMOS in exploring strategic financing, business combinations or sale opportunities for NOMOS. Mr. Manzetti was authorized and directed by the board of directors to negotiate an arrangement with CIBC World Markets. Mr. Manzetti was also instructed by the board of directors to continue discussions with NASI.

        From the end of June 2003 through mid July 2003, NASI interviewed various investment bankers to act as its financial advisor in connection with the proposed transaction with NOMOS, and selected Bear, Stearns & Co. Inc. (Bear Stearns) in mid July 2003.

        Throughout July 2003, NASI management and NOMOS management were engaged in extensive discussions regarding the two companies and the potential benefits of combining them. Discussions also involved NASI's and NOMOS' respective legal advisors, McDermott, Will & Emery and Cohen & Grigsby, and respective financial advisors, Bear Stearns and CIBC World Markets.

44



        On July 7, 2003 and July 8, 2003, at Mr. Manzetti's invitation, Mr. Cutrer and Mr. Edrick again visited NOMOS in Pennsylvania and met with Mr. Manzetti and Mr. Haffner. At these meetings, the two companies began to discuss in more detail a potential strategic combination involving NASI and NOMOS by way of a reverse triangular merger (whereby a newly formed subsidiary of NASI would be merged with and into NOMOS, with NOMOS being the surviving corporation and a wholly-owned subsidiary of NASI). The parties exchanged information relating to their organizational and management structure and discussed the potential strengths the combined companies would have in the radiation therapy industry. Representatives of both parties also discussed preliminary diligence matters associated with the potential business combination. At the conclusion of these meetings, the parties agreed to continue discussions.

        On July 9, 2003, CIBC World Markets' representatives met with Mr. Manzetti and other senior executives of NOMOS at NOMOS' offices in Pennsylvania. In addition to discussing certain strategic transactions, including a potential business combination with NASI, NOMOS began to prepare, with the assistance of CIBC World Markets, a selling memorandum that could be distributed to third parties that might have an interest in a possible transaction with NOMOS. Given the attractiveness of the NASI/NOMOS merger and the momentum with which it was moving forward, the NOMOS board of directors determined that distributing the selling memorandum in July 2003 would be counterproductive. The selling memorandum was never finalized or distributed to third parties.

        On July 24, 2003, Bear Stearns arranged a meeting at NOMOS' offices in Pennsylvania among Mr. Edrick and David DeWolf, NASI's director of finance, Bear Stearns, Mr. Manzetti, Mr. Haffner and CIBC World Markets. The parties primarily focused on reviewing financial models. The parties agreed to meet again on July 28.

        On July 28, 2003 Mr. Cutrer and Mr. Edrick of NASI and Mr. Manzetti and Mr. Haffner of NOMOS met again at NOMOS' offices in Pennsylvania. Representatives of Bear Stearns and CIBC World Markets also were present. The parties exchanged preliminary ideas about the possible organizational and managerial structure that would result from merger of the companies structured as a reverse triangular merger, as well as a proposed preliminary valuation range for NOMOS of approximately $60.0 million to $80.0 million and the implied common stock ownership splits between NASI and NOMOS stockholders whereby NASI stockholders would own approximately 53% to 57% of the common stock of the combined company and NOMOS stockholders would own 47% to 43% of the common stock of the combined company. The parties also further discussed the potential benefits that would result from a combination of the two companies. Following this meeting, representatives of NASI, NOMOS and their respective financial advisors had several telephone conversations during which they continued exploratory discussions concerning the potential business combination. Mr. Manzetti invited Mr. Cutrer, Mr. Edrick and representatives of Bear Stearns to attend the NOMOS board of directors meeting planned for August 5, 2003. Mr. Cutrer and Mr. Edrick then discussed with Mr. Manzetti and Mr. Haffner the issues they intended to raise with the NOMOS board of directors. The parties agreed to present the proposed business combination at the August 5th board meeting.

        On August 1, 2003, Mr. Cutrer and Mr. Edrick and Bear Stearns initiated a call to the NASI board of directors to discuss the meeting with the NOMOS' board of directors planned for August 5, 2003 to describe and support a business combination between NASI and NOMOS. Messrs. Cutrer and Edrick and Bear Stearns informed the NASI board of directors that, among other things, this meeting would outline a range of common stock ownership structures for the combined company in which NASI stockholders would own approximately 53% to 57% of the common stock of the combined company and NOMOS stockholders would own approximately 47% to 43% of the combined company, measured on a fully diluted basis, and excluding any cash consideration to be received by NOMOS stockholders. (These ownership percentages implied exchange ratios of shares of NASI common stock for each outstanding share of NOMOS common stock of approximately 1.088 (if NASI stockholders owned

45



approximately 53% of the combined company) to 0.929 (if NASI stockholders owned approximately 57% of the combined company), respectively.) During this board discussion, it was decided that NASI management and Bear Stearns on behalf of NASI could offer a preliminary proposal to the NOMOS board on August 5 of NOMOS stockholder's ownership in the combined company of up to 47% on a fully diluted basis. This preliminary proposal would be subject to completion of due diligence, among other items. The NASI board of directors approved the proposal and authorized continued discussions with NOMOS.

        At a NOMOS board of directors meeting on August 5, 2003 in New York, Mr. Cutrer and Mr. Edrick, along with representatives from Bear Stearns, met with the NOMOS board of directors and a representative from CIBC World Markets and discussed a business combination between NASI and NOMOS. The meeting included discussion regarding, among other things, background information about NASI and NOMOS and the strategic rationale for a business combination.

        During the NOMOS board meeting on August 5, 2003, the parties also had preliminary discussions regarding possible structure and terms for a proposed transaction, including a potential merger of a wholly owned subsidiary of NASI with and into NOMOS in a tax-free reorganization and ownership of the combined company of 53% and 47% by NASI stockholders and NOMOS stockholders, respectively (which would have resulted at that time in an exchange ratio of 1.088 shares of NASI common stock for each share of NOMOS common stock). Bear Stearns, on behalf of NASI, indicated that a limited upfront cash payment could be considered in lieu of NASI common stock to satisfy certain preferred stockholders.

        After the NASI and Bear Stearns representatives left the meeting, the NOMOS board of directors continued to discuss the proposed transaction. After extensive discussions among the NOMOS board of directors, including a discussion of alternative options, the NOMOS board of directors agreed that Mr. Manzetti should expand discussions with NASI and begin more extensive consulting with NOMOS' legal and financial advisors about the potential business combination. The NOMOS board of directors also approved the granting of an exclusivity period to NASI. This exclusivity period was based on the preliminary proposal made by NASI of common stock ownership structure for the combined company in which NASI stockholders would own approximately 53% of the common stock of the combined company and NOMOS stockholders would own approximately 47% of the combined company, measured on a fully diluted basis.

        An exclusivity agreement was entered into by NASI and NOMOS on August 11, 2003. The exclusivity agreement provided, among other things, that NOMOS would not negotiate a sale or business combination transaction with a person or entity other than NASI prior to August 29, 2003. Shortly after the execution of the exclusivity agreement, NASI's and NOMOS' respective legal advisors began conducting legal due diligence reviews of the companies and preparing drafts of the agreements and other documents relating to the merger. A data room containing due diligence information regarding NOMOS was organized in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania at the offices of Cohen & Grigsby.

        On August 11 and 12, 2003, Mr. Cutrer and Mr. Edrick of NASI and Mr. Manzetti and Mr. Wells of NOMOS met at the American Association of Physicists in Medicine, or AAPM, conference in San Diego, California to further discuss deal rationale and company ownership post-merger. After discussions, the parties agreed further discussions were needed.

        On August 12, 2003, at Mr. Cutrer's invitation, Mr. Manzetti, Mr. Wells and Fred L. Marroni, NOMOS' vice president of engineering, traveled to NASI's offices in Chatsworth, California to discuss transaction structure and preliminary due diligence matters. At this meeting, both companies presented information relating to their products, operations and finances. There were also general discussions regarding the impact of the amount of cash and securities to be received by NOMOS' stockholders on the ability to structure the transaction as a reverse triangular merger. Manzetti was also given a tour of NASI's offices and production facilities in Chatsworth, California. Further, Donald Ecker, NASI board

46



of directors member, met with the above named members of NOMOS' senior management team. After discussions, the parties agreed that further discussions were warranted.

        On August 13, 2003, Erik Johnson, then NASI's controller, McDermott, Will & Emery and PricewaterhouseCoopers, NASI's auditors, visited the NOMOS data room and began conducting a due diligence review of NOMOS and its business.

        Between August 18, 2003 and August 20, 2003, Mr. Haffner and representatives from Cohen & Grigsby traveled to NASI's offices in Chatsworth, California in order to begin their due diligence review of NASI and its business. On August 25 and 26, 2003, representatives of Ernst & Young LLP, NOMOS' auditors, met with representatives of NASI's auditors to conduct accounting and tax due diligence, as directed by NOMOS management.

        On August 20, 2003, representatives from Bear Stearns visited the NOMOS data room and began conducting a due diligence review of NOMOS and its business.

        On August 21, 2003, George Jones, NASI's executive vice president of sales, and David Stiles, NASI's vice president of sales and marketing, called Mr. Wells and then met with him in Boston to discuss sales and marketing strategy. The parties agreed further discussions were needed to analyze sales and marketing strategies which might be effective if the proposed business combination occurred.

        At a special teleconference meeting of NOMOS' board of directors held on August 28, 2003, which was attended by representatives of Cohen & Grigsby and representatives of CIBC World Markets, the board of directors had a lengthy discussion regarding the possible business combination with NASI. At this meeting, NOMOS' board of directors reviewed the businesses of NASI and NOMOS and certain potential strategic and financial benefits of a combination. The board of directors also discussed possible terms of the potential transaction and the risks relating to the difficulty of integrating the two companies. At the conclusion of the meeting, the board of directors agreed that the strategic rationale for the transaction was sound and authorized Mr. Manzetti to negotiate an extension to the exclusivity period, which was about to expire, and to move forward with discussions and negotiations with NASI.

        During the next three weeks, the parties continued their extensive due diligence reviews and continued to negotiate the terms of the merger agreement. Representatives of both NASI and NOMOS, as well as their respective legal counsel and financial advisors, continued to have numerous telephone conversations relating to the terms and conditions of the merger.

        As a general matter, throughout the period during which NOMOS was negotiating with NASI, the NOMOS board of directors considered the possibility of finding alternatives to the NASI transaction, including potential alternative business combinations, as well as potential capital raising activities. However, no formal discussions were initiated by NOMOS with potential alternative merger partners and no valuation was discussed, or due diligence materials exchanged, with any such parties. NOMOS did not actively pursue alternatives because the NOMOS board of directors believed that the transaction with NASI was very attractive from a strategic and financial perspective and that continuing to pursue the merger with NASI was preferable to abandoning that pursuit in lieu of other potential alternatives.

        On September 2, 2003, NASI's board of directors had a telephonic meeting to discuss the proposed NOMOS transaction. On this call, representatives from McDermott, Will & Emery and Bear Stearns reviewed the status and results of NASI's due diligence of NOMOS then conducted to date and the status of negotiations of the proposed business combination. The board of directors also discussed the potential benefits and potential risks for integrating the two businesses. After these discussions, the board of directors, concurred that discussions with NOMOS should continue.

47



        From September 3 through September 5, 2003, Mr. Jones and Mr. Stiles met with Mr. Wells to discuss and design the sales structure and compensation plans once integration occurred. The result of this discussion was presented to Mr. Cutrer, Mr. Edrick and Mr. Manzetti on September 5, 2003.

        On September 12, 2003, Mr. Cutrer and Mr. Edrick initiated a conference call with the NASI board of directors to further discuss the proposed NOMOS transaction. On this call, representatives from McDermott, Will & Emery and Bear Stearns reviewed the status and results of NASI's due diligence of NOMOS then conducted to date and the status of negotiations of the proposed business combination. The board of directors discussed the potential benefits and potential risks for integrating the two businesses. The board of directors also discussed the structure of the proposed business combination. During this call, the NASI board of directors decided that based on the due diligence that had been completed to date on NOMOS and based on reports by NOMOS to NASI regarding its estimated third quarter earnings, the board wished to revise NASI's preliminary non-binding proposal from 47% ownership by NOMOS stockholders of the combined company to some lower percentage (and thereby lowering the exchange ratio), although no specific ownership percentage was decided upon at that time.

        After this discussion, Bear Stearns informed CIBC World Markets that the NASI board of directors wished to reduce NOMOS stockholders' ownership in the combined company (and thereby lower the exchange ratio) from the percentage previously discussed and, as a result, over the next several weeks, Bear Stearns and CIBC World Markets discussed numerous potential proposals although nothing was agreed upon by both sides.

        Bear Stearns discussed with NOMOS and CIBC World Markets several different repricing scenarios which generally included reducing NOMOS stockholders' initial ownership in the combined company. Bear Stearns also discussed a possible earnout (provided certain financial performance objectives were met) to be paid to NOMOS stockholders after the closing of the merger transaction, consisting of a combination of NASI common stock and cash. In accordance with NOMOS instructions, CIBC World Markets informed Bear Stearns that the reduced ownership of NOMOS stockholders in the combined company combined with an earnout was unacceptable to NOMOS.

        In addition, on the evening of September 22, 2003, Mr. Manzetti directly contacted Mr. Cutrer to inform him that NASI's proposed reduction of NOMOS stockholders' ownership in the combined company was unacceptable. Mr. Manzetti indicated, however, that he would be prepared to support a transaction involving a minimum consideration to NOMOS stockholders of $65 million, including a cash component of $8-10 million to satisfy certain preferred stockholders, and no earnout.

        On September 23, 2003, NOMOS' board of directors held a telephone conference call to discuss, among other things, NASI's proposal to reduce the exchange ratio and Mr. Manzetti's rejection of that proposal. The NOMOS board concurred with Mr. Manzetti's position on the valuation and exchange ratio. Also on this call, representatives of Cohen & Grigsby reviewed the status and results of NOMOS' due diligence of NASI then conducted. Mr. Manzetti and representatives of Cohen & Grigsby also updated the board of directors on the status of negotiations of the proposed business combination. Representatives of Cohen & Grigsby reviewed with the board of directors certain portions of the merger agreement, including the representations and warranties, covenants, the provision concerning post-closing composition of NASI's board of directors, provision with respect to alternative transactions, termination provisions and termination fee provisions. Representatives of Cohen & Grigsby also advised the board of directors on its fiduciary duties under the circumstances. During this call, there were extensive discussions regarding the proposed business combination and its potential benefits. The discussions included a review of the previously discussed strategic rationale for the transaction, a presentation relating to NASI's key products and manufacturing capabilities and a review of financial information relating to NASI and NOMOS. There was also a continued discussion of the risks relating

48



to integrating the operations of the two companies. The board of directors directed management to actively continue due diligence activities and negotiations with NASI senior management.

        On September 30, 2003, during NASI's regularly scheduled board of directors meeting held at NASI's headquarters in Chatsworth, California, Mr. Cutrer and Mr. Edrick briefed the board of directors on the status of the negotiations with NOMOS and Bear Stearns presented a summary analysis of the proposed transaction which reflected a preliminary valuation of NOMOS of approximately $65 million. After the discussion, NASI's board of directors authorized NASI's management to move forward with the transaction.

        On October 1, 2003, Mr. Cutrer, Mr. Edrick, Mr. Stiles, Mr. Jay Fan, NASI's director of technical development, Mr. Chris Holbert, NASI's chief information officer visited NOMOS at NOMOS' headquarters to conduct further due diligence.

        During the next several weeks, the parties continued their due diligence and negotiated the terms of a merger agreement and related agreements. During this period, NASI, NOMOS, Bear Stearns and CIBC World Markets discussed the possibility of shifting the basis for discussion of aggregate consideration to be paid away from a minimum dollar valuation of NOMOS to a fixed percentage of the combined company that would be owned by NOMOS stockholders. NASI and NOMOS tentatively agreed to this approach and agreed in principle that NOMOS stockholders would be entitled to approximately 43% of the combined company on a fully diluted basis, approximately 6% of which would be paid in cash in lieu of common stock, with the remaining 37% being paid in NASI common stock.

        Based on recent stock prices, on October 20, 2003, NASI and NOMOS reached a preliminary understanding that the exchange ratio would be 0.891 shares of NASI common stock for each share of NOMOS common stock and approximately 1.212 shares of NASI common stock for each share of NOMOS series A preferred stock, and that the holders of NOMOS series B and series C preferred stock would receive a combination of NASI stock and an aggregate of approximately $12.0 million in cash. These exchange ratios would result in a common stock ownership structure for the combined company in which NASI stockholders would own approximately 63% of the common stock of the combined company and NOMOS stockholders would own approximately 37% of the common stock of the combined company, measured on a fully diluted basis. The allocation of the $12 million in cash between NOMOS' series B and series C preferred stockholders was reached as a result of negotiations between Mr. Manzetti and representatives of holders of a majority of the shares of each such stockholder group. Due to the increase in the amount of cash to be paid (relative to the amount of NASI stock anticipated to be paid), the parties determined that the structure of the transaction would potentially have to be changed from a reverse subsidiary merger to a forward subsidiary merger (in other words, a merger of NOMOS into a wholly-owned subsidiary of NASI, with that subsidiary being the surviving entity of such merger).

        On October 7 and 8, 2003, Mr. Cutrer and Mr. Edrick traveled with Mr. Manzetti and Mr. Wells to visit medical facilities that utilize NOMOS' IMRT technology.

        On October 19 and 20, 2003, Mr. Cutrer and Mr. Edrick of NASI and Mr. Manzetti and Mr. Haffner of NOMOS continued discussions at the American Society of Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology, or ASTRO, conference in Salt Lake City, Utah.

        On October 24, 2003, NOMOS' board of directors held a special meeting by telephone to consider adoption of the merger agreement and approval of the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement. Prior to the meeting, each member of NOMOS' board of directors was provided with materials, including substantially final drafts of the merger agreement and related documents. At this meeting:

49


        Following a discussion of the proposed transaction, which lasted approximately two hours, NOMOS' board of directors unanimously determined that the merger and terms of the merger agreement were advisable, fair to, and in the best interests of NOMOS and its stockholders, unanimously approved the merger agreement, the proposed merger and the other transactions contemplated by the merger agreement and determined to recommend to NOMOS stockholders that they approve the merger agreement, the proposed merger and the other transactions contemplated by the merger agreement. The board of directors also approved the proposed amendment to NOMOS' certificate of incorporation.

        On October 25, 2003, NASI's board of directors conducted a special telephonic meeting to approve the merger and the execution of the merger agreement. Prior to the meeting, each member of NASI's board of directors was provided with materials, including substantially final drafts of the merger agreement and related documents. At this meeting which lasted approximately 3 hours:

        Following question and answer sessions with the various parties in attendance, the board of directors unanimously approved the merger agreement and the proposed merger, the approval of the issuance of shares of NASI common stock in connection with the merger and the other transactions contemplated by the merger agreement, the amendments to the Amended and Restated 1996 Stock Option Plan and the amendment to NASI's Rights Agreement.

        Following the approvals of the merger and related transactions by their respective boards of directors, NASI and NOMOS executed the merger agreement on October 26, 2003. Prior to the opening of trading on the Nasdaq National Market on October 27, 2003, NASI and NOMOS issued a joint press release announcing the execution of the merger agreement.

50



Certain Exchanged Information

        In connection with their due diligence investigation of each other, NASI and NOMOS exchanged internal financial projections of future financial performance that were prepared at that time by their respective managements. The exchanged financial projections were then provided by the companies to their respective financial advisors. The information provided by NASI to NOMOS was used by CIBC World Markets in the financial analyses presented to the NOMOS board of directors for the purpose of rendering its opinion. The projections provided by NOMOS to NASI were revised by NASI management to reflect NASI management's more conservative view of the future financial performance of NOMOS, and these adjusted NOMOS projections were provided to Bear Stearns and used by Bear Stearns in the financial analyses presented to the NASI board of directors for the purpose of rendering its opinion.

        The unadjusted NOMOS financial projections provided to NASI were based on a December 31 fiscal year-end and reflected the following projections based on various assumptions made at that time: 2004 revenue and EBITDA of $41.6 million and $4.7 million, respectively; 2005 revenue and EBITDA of $51.3 million and $7.4 million, respectively; 2006 revenue and EBITDA of $64.7 million and $12.3 million, respectively; 2007 revenue and EBITDA of $75.0 million and $15.2 million, respectively, and 2008 revenue and EBITDA of $88.1 million and $18.8 million, respectively. The adjusted NOMOS projections reflected the following projections: 2004 revenue and EBITDA of $37.7 million and $2.8 million, respectively; 2005 revenue and EBITDA of $44.9 million and $4.8 million, respectively; 2006 revenue and EBITDA of $53.4 million and $8.0 million, respectively; 2007 revenue and EBITDA of $69.0 million and $12.1 million, respectively; and 2008 revenue and EBITDA of $83.8 million and $15.9 million, respectively. EBITDA is defined as earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization.

        The NASI financial projections were based on an October 31 fiscal year-end and were separated as follows: (i) the NASI business excluding the Apomate™ product program and (ii) the Apomate™ product program. The NASI financial projections provided to NOMOS for the NASI business excluding the Apomate™ product program reflected the following projections based on various assumptions made at that time: 2004 revenue and EBITDA of $20.7 million and $1.9 million, respectively; 2005 revenue and EBITDA of $24.2 million and $4.1 million, respectively; 2006 revenue and EBITDA of $28.0 million and $6.4 million, respectively; 2007 revenue and EBITDA of $30.5 million and $7.4 million, respectively; and 2008 revenue and EBITDA of $31.8 million and $8.2 million, respectively.    The NASI financial projections provided to NOMOS for the Apomate™ product program reflected that revenue would begin to be generated in 2009 and positive operating income would begin to be generated in 2010.

        NASI (except for annual revenue guidance) and NOMOS do not as a matter of course make public projections as to expected future financial performance. The NASI and NOMOS financial projections were prepared by the respective managements of NASI and NOMOS solely for internal use in connection with their due diligence investigation of each other and not for publication or with a view to complying with the published guidelines of the Securities and Exchange Commission or the guidelines established by the American Institute of Public Accountants for preparation and presentation of financial projections ("prospective financial information"). The prospective financial information included herein is the responsibility of NASI and NOMOS managements. Neither the independent accountants of NASI or NOMOS, nor any other independent accountants, have compiled, examined or performed any procedures with respect to the prospective financial information and accordingly, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP and Ernst & Young LLP, do not express any opinion or any other form of assurance with respect thereto. The PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP report incorporated by reference in this joint proxy statement/prospectus relates to the NASI historical financial information. The Ernst & Young LLP report included in this joint proxy statement/prospectus relates to the NOMOS historical financial information. Such reports on historical financial information do not

51



extend to the prospective financial information and should not be read to do so. These projections are included in this joint proxy statement/prospectus only because they were provided as part of the companies' respective due diligence investigation of each other prior to signing the merger agreement and their respective ongoing dialogues with their financial advisors for purposes of their respective analyses, and they were not prepared with a view toward public disclosure. Due to inherent uncertainties and contingencies of such projections, as discussed below, there can be no assurance that these estimates will be realized. Except to the extent required under the federal securities laws, neither NASI nor NOMOS intend to make publicly available any update or other revision to the projections to reflect circumstances existing after the date of the preparation of the projections or the occurrence of future events even if any or all of the assumptions relating to the projections are shown to be in error. The projections were not designed to be guarantees of performance and are not intended to be guarantees of performance. This projected financial information may differ materially from performance guidance that NASI has publicly released and may in the future publicly release because the projections included herein were based on assumptions made at the time they were prepared that may be materially different from those relied on in connection with the performance guidance. This projected financial information was as a matter of necessity based on numerous assumptions with respect to industry performance, general business and economic conditions, scientific achievements, capital spending by customers and other matters, all of which are inherently subject to significant uncertainties and contingencies and many of which are beyond NASI's or NOMOS' control. One cannot predict whether the assumptions made in preparing this projected financial information were accurate, and actual results may be materially different from those contained in the projected financial information. Projected financial information of this type is based on estimates and assumptions made at the time the projections were prepared that are inherently subject to significant economic, industry and competitive uncertainties and contingencies, including certain risks described in the section of this joint proxy statement/prospectus entitled "Risk Factors," all of which are difficult to predict and many of which are beyond the control of NASI or NOMOS, as the case may be. Neither CIBC World Markets nor Bear Stearns independently verified the projections or the underlying assumptions used in such projections. The use of such projections in the opinions of CIBC World Markets and Bear Stearns was based on representations by NASI and NOMOS that the projections were reasonably prepared on bases reflecting the best available information then available to NASI's and NOMOS' management, including estimates and judgments of the companies' future financial condition and operating results at the time of preparation. Accordingly, the projected financial information should not be relied upon as fact or necessarily predictive of future results.

Reasons of NASI's Board of Directors for the Merger

        In reaching its decision to approve the merger agreement and proceed with the business combination with NOMOS, NASI's board of directors consulted with NASI's management, legal advisors, accounting advisors and financial advisors regarding the strategic, operational, financial and legal aspects of the merger. During the course of such consultations, NASI's board of directors did not specifically review or otherwise consider other strategic alternatives to the proposed transaction with NOMOS. In the course of reaching its decision to approve the merger agreement, the proposed merger, the issuance of the shares of NASI common stock and the other transactions contemplated by the merger agreement and the amendments to the Amended and Restated 1996 Stock Option Plan the board of directors considered a variety of factors weighing positively in favor of the merger, including the following:

52


53


        In its review of the proposed merger, NASI's board of directors considered a number of other factors weighing negatively against the merger, including:

54


55


        NASI's board of directors did not find it constructive to and did not quantify, rank or otherwise assign relative weights to the factors considered in reaching its decision. NASI believes that the preceding discussion of the information and factors considered by the NASI board of directors includes all of the material positive and negative factors considered by the NASI board of directors, but it is not intended to be exhaustive and may not include all of the factors considered by the NASI board of directors. The NASI board of directors did not assign any particular weight or rank to the factors it considered in approving the merger. In determining to approve the merger, individual members of NASI's board of directors may have placed different weight on the various factors. The NASI board of directors as a whole, however, determined that the positive factors of the merger significantly outweighed the negative factors.

        After considering all of the information and factors discussed in this section, NASI's board of directors unanimously approved the merger agreement, the proposed merger and the other transactions contemplated by the merger agreement and believes that the terms of the merger are advisable, fair to and in the best interests of NASI and its stockholders. NASI's board of directors unanimously recommends that NASI stockholders vote FOR the proposals relating to approval of the merger agreement, the proposed merger, the approval of the issuance of shares of NASI common stock in connection with the merger and the other transactions contemplated by the merger agreement, the amendments to the Amended and Restated 1996 Stock Option Plan and approval of the adjournment of the special meeting to a later date, if necessary, to solicit additional proxies if there are not sufficient votes at the special meeting to approve the merger-related proposals.

Reasons of NOMOS' Board of Directors for the Merger

        At a meeting held on October 24, 2003, the board of directors of NOMOS concluded that the merger with NASI is fair to, and in the best interests of, NOMOS and its stockholders. Accordingly, the board of directors of NOMOS determined to recommend that the NOMOS stockholders approve the merger agreement, the proposed merger and the other transactions contemplated by the merger agreement.

        In making its decision as to the advisability of approving the merger agreement and proceeding with the business combination with NASI, NOMOS' board of directors consulted with NOMOS' senior management and its advisors. During the course of such consultations, NOMOS' board of directors did not specifically review or otherwise consider other strategic alternatives to the proposed transaction with NASI. In the course of reaching its decision, the board of directors considered a variety of factors weighing positively in favor of the merger, including the following:

55


56


        In its review of the proposed merger, the NOMOS board of directors also reviewed and considered the interests that certain officers and directors of NOMOS may have with respect to the merger in addition to their interests as stockholders of NOMOS generally, including that certain executive officers have interests in the combined company as employees in terms of job responsibilities, working environment and compensation which are in addition to, and different from, their interests as stockholders. These potential conflicts of interests are described in the section of this joint proxy statement/prospectus entitled "Interests of Certain Persons in the Merger".

        In its review of the proposed merger, the NOMOS board of directors also considered a number of other factors weighing negatively against the merger including the following:

        In view of the wide variety of factors considered in connection with its evaluation of the merger and the complexity of these matters, the NOMOS board of directors did not find it useful to and did not attempt to quantify, rank or otherwise assign relative weights to these factors. NOMOS believes that the preceding discussion of the information and factors considered by the NOMOS board of directors includes all of the material positive and negative factors considered by the NOMOS board of directors but is not intended to be exhaustive and may not include all factors considered by the

57



NOMOS board of directors. The NOMOS board of directors conducted an overall analysis of the factors described above. In considering the factors described above, individual members of NOMOS' board of directors may have given different weight to different factors. The NOMOS board of directors as a whole, however, determined that the positive aspects of the merger significantly outweighed the negative factors.

        After considering all of the information and factors discussed in this section, NOMOS' board of directors unanimously approved the merger agreement, the proposed merger and the other transactions contemplated by the merger agreement, and NOMOS' board of directors believes that the terms of the merger are advisable, fair to and in the best interests of NOMOS and its stockholders. NOMOS' board of directors unanimously recommends that NOMOS stockholders vote FOR approval of the merger agreement, the proposed merger and the other transactions contemplated by the merger agreement and the proposal relating to the adjournment of the special meeting to a later date, if necessary, to solicit additional proxies if there are not sufficient votes at the special meeting to approve the merger agreement.

Accounting Treatment of the Merger

        The merger will be accounted for as a purchase by NASI under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. Under the purchase method of accounting, the assets and liabilities of NOMOS will be recorded, as of completion of the merger, at their respective fair values and added to those of NASI. Reported financial condition and results of operations of NASI will reflect NOMOS' balances and results after completion of the merger, but will not be restated retroactively to reflect the historical financial position or results of operations of NOMOS. Following the completion of the merger, the earnings of the combined company will reflect purchase accounting adjustments, including in-process research and development charges and increased cost of sales, amortization and depreciation expense for acquired assets and related tax benefits.

Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences of the Merger

        The following is a discussion of the material U.S. federal income tax consequences of the merger to NOMOS stockholders who receive shares of common stock of NASI in the merger. This discussion addresses only a NOMOS stockholder who is a U.S. citizen or resident and holds NOMOS common stock and preferred stock as a capital asset. It does not address all of the U.S. federal income tax consequences that may be relevant to a particular NOMOS stockholder in light of that stockholder's individual circumstances or to a NOMOS stockholder who is subject to special rules, including, without limitation:

58


        The following discussion is based on the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or the Code, applicable U.S. Department of the Treasury regulations, administrative interpretations and court decisions, each as in effect as of the date of this joint proxy statement/prospectus and all of which are subject to change, possibly with retroactive effect. It is not binding on the Internal Revenue Service, or the IRS. In addition, the discussion does not address any state, local or foreign tax consequences of the merger.

        NOMOS stockholders strongly are urged to consult their tax advisors as to the specific tax consequences to them of the merger in light of their particular circumstances including the applicability and effect of U.S. federal, state, local, foreign and other tax laws.

        NASI and NOMOS anticipate that the merger will qualify as a reorganization within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the Code. It is a condition to the completion of the merger that NASI receive a written opinion from McDermott, Will & Emery and NOMOS receive a written opinion from Cohen & Grigsby, in each case dated as of the effective date of the merger, both to the effect that the merger will qualify as a reorganization within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the Code. Neither NASI nor NOMOS currently intends to waive this condition. The opinions will rely on assumptions, including assumptions regarding the absence of changes in existing facts and law and the completion of the merger in the manner contemplated by the merger agreement, and representations and covenants made by NASI, AM Capital I, Inc. and NOMOS, including those contained in representation letters of officers of NASI, AM Capital I, Inc. and NOMOS. If any of those representations, covenants or assumptions is inaccurate, counsel may not be able to render the required opinions and the tax consequences of the merger could differ from those discussed here. An opinion of counsel represents counsel's reasonable legal judgment and is not binding on the IRS or any court, nor does it preclude the IRS from adopting a contrary position. No ruling has been or will be sought from the IRS on the U.S. federal income tax consequences of the merger.

        In addition, in connection with the filing of the registration statement of which this document forms a part, McDermott, Will & Emery and Cohen & Grigsby have delivered to NASI and NOMOS, respectively, their opinions, dated as of January 23, 2004 and January 22, 2004, respectively, that, for U.S. federal income tax purposes, the merger will qualify as a reorganization under Section 368(a) of the Internal Revenue Code. Such opinions and the opinions set forth below have been rendered on the basis of certain assumptions, including assumptions regarding the absence of changes in existing facts and that the merger will be completed in accordance with this joint proxy statement/prospectus and the merger agreement. These opinions and the opinions set forth below also have been rendered on the basis of representations, including those contained in officers' certificates of NASI and NOMOS, all of which must be true and accurate in all respects as of the effective date of the registration statement and must continue to be true and accurate in all respects as of the effective time of the merger, and on covenants. If any of those assumptions or representations are inaccurate, incomplete or untrue or any of the covenants are breached, the conclusions contained in the opinions referred to in this paragraph or stated below could be affected.

        The discussion set forth below, subject to the limitations and qualifications set forth herein, constitutes the opinion of McDermott, Will & Emery and of Cohen & Grigsby as to the material U.S. federal income tax consequences to a NOMOS stockholder of the exchange of NOMOS common stock and preferred stock for NASI common stock and cash pursuant to the merger:

59


Possible Treatment of Cash as a Dividend

        In general, the determination of whether the gain recognized by a NOMOS stockholder will be treated as capital gain or as a dividend will depend upon whether, and to what extent, the merger reduces the NOMOS stockholder's deemed percentage stock ownership interest in NASI, as well as upon such stockholder's particular circumstances. For purposes of this determination, a NOMOS stockholder will be treated as if the stockholder first exchanged all of its NOMOS common stock and preferred stock solely for NASI common stock (instead of the combination of NASI common stock and cash actually received) and then NASI immediately redeemed a portion of that NASI common stock in exchange for the cash that the stockholder actually received in the merger (excluding cash received instead of a fractional share). The gain recognized will be treated as capital gain if the deemed redemption is "substantially disproportionate" or "not essentially equivalent to a dividend" with respect to the NOMOS stockholder.

        In general, the deemed redemption will be "substantially disproportionate" with respect to a NOMOS stockholder if the stockholder experiences at least a 20% reduction in its interest in NASI as a result of the deemed redemption. In order for the deemed redemption to be "not essentially equivalent to a dividend," the deemed redemption must result in a "meaningful reduction" in the

60



NOMOS stockholder's deemed percentage stock ownership of NASI common stock. The Internal Revenue Service has indicated that a minority stockholder in a publicly traded corporation whose relative stock interest is minimal and who exercises no control with respect to corporate affairs will experience a "meaningful reduction" if that stockholder experiences any reduction in its percentage stock ownership in connection with a transaction such as the merger. In applying the foregoing tests, a stockholder will, under the constructive ownership rules, be deemed to own stock that is owned by certain related persons or entities or with respect to which the stockholder owns options, in addition to the stock actually owned by that stockholder. Any dividend income recognized in the merger by individual NOMOS stockholders generally will be subject to tax at a maximum rate of 15%.

Cash Received Instead of a Fractional Share

        NASI will not issue any fractional shares of NASI common stock in the merger. Rather, each holder of NOMOS common stock and preferred stock exchanged in the merger who otherwise would have received a fraction of a share of NASI common stock will receive cash. A NOMOS stockholder who receives cash instead of a fractional share of NASI common stock generally will recognize capital gain or loss based on the difference between the amount of the cash received and the tax basis that the stockholder would have had in such fractional share.

Capital Gain

        Any capital gain recognized by an individual holder of NOMOS common stock and preferred stock in connection with the merger will be subject to a maximum U.S. federal income tax rate of 15% if the individual's holding period for the NOMOS common stock and preferred stock is more than one year at the effective time of the merger.

Reporting Requirements

        NOMOS stockholders receiving NASI common stock in the merger must file a statement with their U.S. federal income tax returns setting forth their tax basis in the NOMOS common stock and preferred stock exchanged in the merger and the fair market value of the NASI common stock and the amount of any cash received in the merger. In addition, NOMOS stockholders will be required to retain permanent records of these facts relating to the merger.

Backup Withholding

        Certain noncorporate holders of NOMOS stock may be subject to backup withholding, at applicable federal rates, on amounts received pursuant to the merger. Backup withholding will not apply, however, to a NOMOS stockholder who (1) provides a correct taxpayer identification number or (2) comes within certain exempt categories and, in each case, complies with applicable certification requirements. If a NOMOS stockholder does not provide NASI (or the exchange agent) with its correct taxpayer identification number, the holder may be subject to penalties imposed by the Internal Revenue Service. Any amounts withheld under the backup withholding rules may be allowed as a refund or a credit against the stockholder's U.S. federal income tax liability, provided that the stockholder furnishes certain required information to the Internal Revenue Service.

        The summary of material U.S. federal income tax consequences set forth above is intended to provide only a general summary and is not intended to be a complete analysis or description of all potential U.S. federal income tax consequences of the merger. In addition, the summary does not address tax consequences that may vary with, or are contingent on, individual circumstances. Moreover, the summary does not address any non-income tax or any foreign, state, local or other tax consequences of the merger. Accordingly, each NOMOS stockholder is strongly urged to consult such

61


stockholder's tax advisor to determine the particular federal, state, local or foreign income, reporting or other tax consequences of the merger to that stockholder.

Dissenters' Appraisal Rights

        If the merger agreement, the proposed merger and the other transactions contemplated by the merger agreement are approved by the required vote of NOMOS stockholders and the proposed merger is not abandoned or terminated, holders of NOMOS capital stock who did not vote in favor of the proposal may have the right to demand in cash the fair value of all (but not less than all) of their NOMOS shares instead of receiving the shares of NASI common stock and other merger consideration contemplated by the merger agreement. However, it is a condition to NASI's obligation to consummate the merger that such appraisal rights have not been exercised with respect to more than 5% of the outstanding shares of NOMOS' common stock. Holders of options or warrants to purchase NOMOS stock are not entitled to appraisal rights with respect to such options and warrants. Shares of NOMOS stock will not be exchanged for the NASI common stock and the other merger consideration contemplated by the merger agreement if the holder of the shares validly exercises and perfects statutory appraisal rights with respect to such NOMOS shares by complying with Section 262 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, or DGCL, a copy of which is attached to this joint proxy statement/prospectus as Annex J. When and if the holder of such NOMOS shares withdraws the demand for appraisal or otherwise becomes ineligible to exercise appraisal rights, such shares will be automatically exchanged for shares of NASI common stock and the other merger consideration contemplated by the merger agreement on the same basis as all other NOMOS shares of the same class or series, as applicable, that are exchanged in connection with the merger.

        A summary of Delaware law regarding dissenting stockholders' appraisal rights is provided below. However, in view of the complexity of the law relating to appraisal rights, NOMOS stockholders considering objecting to the merger are urged to consult their own legal counsel.

Appraisal Rights Procedures

        If you are a NOMOS stockholder and you wish to exercise your appraisal rights, you must satisfy the provisions of Section 262 of the DGCL. Section 262 requires the following:

        You Must Make a Written Demand for Appraisal.    You must deliver a written demand for appraisal to NOMOS before the vote on the merger agreement and the proposed merger contemplated by the merger agreement is taken at the special meeting. This written demand for appraisal must be provided to NOMOS separately from your proxy. In other words, a vote against the merger agreement, the proposed merger and the other transactions contemplated by the merger agreement will not alone constitute a valid demand for appraisal. Additionally, this written demand must reasonably inform NOMOS of your identity and of your intention to demand the appraisal of your shares of NOMOS stock.

        You Must Refrain from Voting for Approval of the Merger.    You must not vote for approval of the merger agreement and the proposed merger contemplated by the merger agreement. If you vote, by proxy or in person, in favor of the merger agreement and the proposed merger contemplated by the merger agreement, this will terminate your right to appraisal. You can also terminate your right to appraisal if you return a signed proxy and (1) fail to vote against approval of the merger agreement and the proposed merger contemplated by the merger agreement or (2) fail to note that you are abstaining from voting on the merger agreement and the proposed merger contemplated by the merger agreement. In such event, your appraisal rights will be terminated even if you previously filed a written demand for appraisal.

62



        You Must Continuously Hold Your NOMOS Shares.    You must continuously hold your shares of NOMOS stock, from the date you make the demand for appraisal through the effective date of the merger. If you are the record holder of NOMOS stock on the date the written demand for appraisal is made but thereafter transfer the shares prior to the effective date of the merger, you will lose any right to appraisal in respect of those shares. You should read the paragraphs below for more details on making a demand for appraisal.

        A written demand for appraisal of NOMOS stock is effective only if it is signed by, or for, the stockholder of record who owns such shares at the time the demand is made. The demand must be signed as the stockholder's name appears on his/her/its stock certificate(s). If you are the beneficial owner of NOMOS stock, but not the stockholder of record, you must have the stockholder of record sign a demand for appraisal.

        If you own NOMOS stock in a fiduciary capacity, such as a trustee, guardian or custodian, you must disclose the fact that you are signing the demand for appraisal in that capacity.

        If you own NOMOS stock together with one or more persons, such as in a joint tenancy or tenancy in common, all of the owners must sign, or have signed for them, the demand for appraisal. An authorized agent, which could include one or more of the joint owners, may sign the demand for appraisal for a stockholder of record; however, the agent must expressly disclose the identity of the stockholder of record and the fact that the agent is signing the demand as that stockholder's agent.

        If you are a NOMOS stockholder who elects to exercise appraisal rights, you should mail or deliver a written demand to:

NOMOS Corporation

200 West Kensinger Drive
Suite 100
Cranberry Township, PA 16066
Attention: David J. Haffner

        It is important that NOMOS receive all written demands for appraisal before the vote concerning the merger agreement and the proposed merger contemplated by the merger agreement is taken at the special meeting. As explained above, this written demand should be signed by, or on behalf of, the stockholder of record. The written demand for appraisal should specify the stockholder's name and mailing address, the number of shares of stock owned, and that the stockholder is thereby demanding appraisal of that stockholder's shares.

        If you fail to comply with any of these conditions and the merger becomes effective, you will only be entitled to receive the merger consideration provided in the merger agreement.

        Written Notice.    Within ten days after the effective date of the merger, NOMOS must give written notice that the merger has become effective to each stockholder who has fully complied with the conditions of Section 262 of the DGCL.

        Petition with the Chancery Court.    Within 120 days after the effective date of the merger, either NOMOS or any NOMOS stockholder who has complied with the conditions of Section 262 of the DGCL, may file a petition in the Delaware Court of Chancery. This petition should request that the chancery court determine the value of the shares of stock held by all of the stockholders who are entitled to appraisal rights. If you intend to exercise your rights of appraisal, you should file such a petition in the chancery court. NOMOS has no intention at this time to file such a petition. Because NOMOS has no obligation to file such a petition, if you do not file such a petition within 120 days after the effective date of the merger, you will lose your rights of appraisal.

63



        Withdrawal of Demand.    If you change your mind and decide you no longer want appraisal rights, you may withdraw your demand for appraisal rights at any time within 60 days after the effective date of the merger. You may also withdraw your demand for appraisal rights after 60 days after the effective date of the merger, but only with the written consent of NOMOS. If you effectively withdraw your demand for appraisal rights, you will receive the merger consideration provided in the merger agreement in respect of your shares of NOMOS capital stock.

        Request for Appraisal Rights Statement.    If you have complied with the conditions of Section 262 of the DGCL, you are entitled to receive a statement from NOMOS. This statement will set forth the number of shares that have demanded appraisal rights, and the number of stockholders who own those shares. In order to receive this statement, you must send a written request to NOMOS within 120 days after the effective date of the merger. After the merger, NOMOS has 10 days after receiving your request to mail the statement to you.

        Chancery Court Procedures.    If you properly file a petition for appraisal in the chancery court and deliver a copy to NOMOS, NOMOS will then have 20 days to provide the chancery court with a list of the names and addresses of all stockholders who have demanded appraisal rights and have not reached an agreement with NOMOS as to the value of their shares. The chancery court will then send notice to all of the stockholders who have demanded appraisal rights. If the chancery court thinks it is appropriate, it has the power to conduct a hearing to determine whether you have fully complied with Section 262 of the DGCL and whether you are entitled to appraisal rights under that section. The chancery court may also require you to submit your stock certificates to the Registry in Chancery so that it can note on the certificates that an appraisal proceeding is pending. If you do not follow the chancery court's directions, you may be dismissed from the proceeding.

        Appraisal of Shares.    After the chancery court determines which stockholders are entitled to appraisal rights, the chancery court will appraise the shares of stock. To determine the fair value of the shares, the chancery court will consider all relevant factors except for any appreciation or depreciation due to the anticipation or accomplishment of the merger. After the chancery court determines the fair value of the shares, it will direct NOMOS to pay that value to the stockholders who are entitled to appraisal rights. The chancery court can also direct NOMOS to pay interest, simple or compound, on that value if the chancery court determines that the payment of interest is appropriate. In order to receive the fair value of your shares, you must then surrender your NOMOS stock certificates to NOMOS.

        The chancery court could determine that the fair value of your shares of NOMOS stock is more than, the same as, or less than the merger consideration. In other words, if you demand appraisal rights, you could receive less consideration than you would under the merger agreement. You should also be aware that an opinion of an investment banking firm that the merger consideration is fair from a financial point of view is not an opinion that the merger consideration is fair for purposes of Section 262 of the DGCL.

        Costs and Expenses of Appraisal Proceeding.    The costs and expenses of the appraisal proceeding may be assessed against NOMOS and the stockholders participating in the appraisal proceeding, as the chancery court deems equitable under the circumstances. You can request that the chancery court determine the amount of interest, if any, NOMOS should pay on the value of stock owned by stockholders entitled to the payment of interest. You may also request that the chancery court allocate the expenses of the appraisal action incurred by any stockholder pro rata against the value of all of the shares entitled to appraisal.

        Loss of Stockholder's Rights.    If you demand appraisal rights, from and after the effective date of the merger you will not (unless you properly withdraw your demand for appraisal) be entitled to:

64




        If no petition for an appraisal is filed within 120 days after the effective date of the merger, your right to an appraisal will cease. You may withdraw your demand for appraisal and accept the merger consideration by delivering to NOMOS a written withdrawal of your demand, except that (1) any attempt to withdraw your demand for appraisal made more than 60 days after the effective date of the merger will require the written approval of NOMOS, and (2) an appraisal proceeding in the chancery court cannot be dismissed unless the chancery court approves such dismissal.

Federal Securities Laws Consequences; Stock Transfer Restriction Agreements

        The registration statement of which this joint proxy statement/prospectus is a part does not cover any resales of the NASI common stock to be received by NOMOS stockholders upon completion of the merger, and no person is authorized to make any use of this joint proxy statement/prospectus in connection with any such resale.

        All shares of NASI common stock received by NOMOS stockholders in the merger will be freely transferable, except that shares of NASI common stock received by persons who are deemed to be "affiliates" of NOMOS under the Securities Act at the time of NOMOS' special meeting may be resold by them only in transactions permitted by Rule 145 under the Securities Act or as otherwise permitted under the Securities Act. Persons who may be deemed to be affiliates of NOMOS for these purposes generally include individuals or entities that control, are controlled by or are under common control with NOMOS, and may include directors and executive officers of NOMOS. The merger agreement and affiliate letter permits NASI to place appropriate legends on stock certificates of persons deemed affiliates and to issue stop transfer instructions to NASI's stock transfer agent. See "Related Agreements—Affiliate Letters".

Stock Exchange Listing

        It is a condition to the merger that the shares of NASI common stock issuable in the merger be approved for listing on the Nasdaq National Market, subject to official notice of issuance, under the ticker symbol "NASI".

65



INFORMATION REGARDING NASI

Business

        NASI is engaged in the design, development and production of innovative radioactive products, including sealed radioactive sources about the size of a grain of rice, that are implanted into the prostate gland, delivering a prescribed, therapeutic dose of radiation to treat prostate cancer, which we refer to as brachytherapy seeds. We also are developing a radioactive imaging agent which is intended to be used primarily to determine the efficacy of chemotherapy, which we refer to as a radiopharmaceutical. Brachytherapy is a minimally invasive means to treat prostate cancer with reduced side effects. Since 1990, NASI has applied its expertise in radioactive isotope products to develop and market products for medical, environmental, research and industrial applications.

        In 1996, NASI began to focus its research and product development activities primarily on high value, high growth medical products that are useful in the diagnosis, management and treatment of diseases such as cancer and heart disease. This initiative resulted in the development of its first two therapeutic products, iodine-based and palladium-based implantable brachytherapy seeds for the treatment of prostate cancer. NASI began manufacturing Iodine-125 seeds for commercial use in 1998, and introduced a Palladium-103 seed the following year. These products were initially marketed under an exclusive third party marketing and distribution agreement, which terminated in January 2003. NASI now directly markets and sells its Iodine-125 seeds under the trade name Prospera® I-125, and its Palladium-103 seeds under the trade name Prospera® Pd-103.

        NASI's primary radiopharmaceutical product candidate, Hynic-Annexin V, is an in vivo nuclear medicine imaging agent that targets cells undergoing apoptosis or necrosis, two common forms of cell death. Hynic-Annexin V is intended to be used for determining response to anti-cancer treatment within days of the first dose of therapy. It also has been shown to image myocardial cell death due to heart attack and to provide early evidence of cardiac transplant rejection. NASI intends for this product candidate to provide information that would allow clinicians to make better therapeutic decisions for individual patients by monitoring a patient's response to treatment of disease with increased accuracy and timeliness.

        The Hynic-Annexin V product candidate is currently in clinical trials in Europe for early detection of patient response to chemotherapy treatment in patients with lung cancer. In June 2003, NASI opened an Investigational New Drug (IND) application in the U.S. for Hynic-Annexin V. Studies are intended to provide preliminary assessment of the predictive value of Hynic-Annexin V imaging at various times following a single course of chemotherapy. The clinical study is also designed to provide information about product safety, biodistribution and imaging technique after initiation of chemotherapy in patients with lung cancer.

66


Beneficial Ownership of Capital Stock of NASI

        The following table sets forth information known to NASI with respect to the beneficial ownership of NASI's common stock as of March 10, 2004 by (i) all those known by NASI to own more than 5% of NASI's outstanding common stock, (ii) each of NASI's directors, (iii) each executive officer of NASI and (iv) all directors and executive officers of NASI as a group.

 
   
  Percentage of Shares Beneficially Owned
 
Name and Address(1)

  Number of
Shares

  Before
Merger(2)

  After
Merger(3)

 
Irwin J. Gruverman   484,322 (4) 4.6 % 3.1 %
L. Michael Cutrer   952,917 (5) 8.6   5.8  
Donald N. Ecker   8,334 (6) *   *  
Dr. Jonathan P. Gertler   8,334 (6) *   *  
Dr. Allan M. Green   335,750 (7) 3.2   2.1  
Erik L. Johnson   12,814 (8) *   *  
Dr. Elliot Lebowitz   10,000 (9) *   *  
Mitchell H. Saranow   36,667 (10) *   *  
Dr. Gary N. Wilner   9,334 (11) *   *  
All directors and executive officers as a group (9 persons)   1,858,472 (12) 16.4   11.2  
Kennedy Capital Management, Inc.
St. Louis, MO 63141
  569,050 (13) 5.5   3.6  
SAFECO Corporation
SAFECO Plaza, Seattle WA 98185
  1,087,500 (14) 10.5   7.0  

 


 

 


 

Percentage of NASI Shares
Beneficially Owned


 
 
  Number of
NASI Shares
After the Merger

  Before Merger(2)
  After Merger(3)
 
Additional Officers and Directors of NASI after the completion of the merger              
John W. Manzetti   373,071 (15)   2.4 %
John A. Friede   2,477,555 (16)   15.9  
All directors and officers as a group after completion of the merger (11 persons)   4,709,098 (17)   30.40  

*
Denotes less than 1%

(1)
This table is based upon information supplied by officers, directors, and principal stockholders of NASI and by Schedules 13D and 13G filed with the SEC. Except where indicated, the address of each five percent stockholder is c/o NASI, 20200 Sunburst Street, Chatsworth, CA 91311.

(2)
Applicable percentages are based on 10,353,807 shares of NASI common stock outstanding, adjusted as required.

(3)
Applicable percentages are based on the sum of (A) 10,353,807 shares of NASI common stock and (B) the number of shares of NASI common stock acquirable upon consummation of the merger with respect to each class of series of NOMOS capital stock as follows: (i) each share of NOMOS common stock issued and outstanding immediately prior to the effective time of the merger is converted into 0.891 shares of NASI common stock, (ii) each share of NOMOS class A preferred stock issued and outstanding immediately prior to the effective time of the merger is converted into approximately 1.212 shares of NASI common stock, (iii) each share of NOMOS

67


(4)
Includes 70,001 shares subject to outstanding options which are deemed exercised. Excludes 20,000 shares owned by the reporting person's spouse, as to which the reporting person disclaims beneficial ownership.

(5)
Includes 674,334 shares subject to outstanding options which are deemed exercised. Also includes 53,583 shares owned by a trust over which the reporting person has shared voting and dispositive power with his spouse. Also includes 5,586 shares held in a trust for the reporting person's sons.

(6)
Includes 8,334 shares subject to outstanding option which are deemed exercised.

(7)
Includes 166,617 shares subject to outstanding options which are deemed exercised.

(8)
Includes 10,334 shares subject to outstanding options which are deemed exercised.

(9)
Includes 10,000 shares subject to outstanding options which are deemed exercised.

(10)
Includes 31,667 shares subject to outstanding options which are deemed exercised.

(11)
Includes 8,334 shares subject to outstanding options which are deemed exercised.

(12)
Includes 988,005 shares subject to outstanding options which are deemed exercised.

(13)
Schedule 13G dated December 31, 2003 states that Kennedy Capital Management, Inc. is the beneficial owner of 569,050 shares.

(14)
Schedule 13G dated December 31, 2003 states that SAFECO Corporation is the parent holding company of SAFECO Asset Management Company, that SAFECO Asset Management Company is an investment adviser and the reported shares are owned beneficially by registered investment companies for which SAFECO Asset Management Company serves as investment adviser, including SAFECO Common Stock Trust, and that each of SAFECO Corporation and SAFECO Asset Management Company is an indirect beneficial owner of such shares based upon its shared voting and dispositive power over all 1,087,500 shares owned by such investment companies.

(15)
Includes 373,071 shares subject to outstanding options which are deemed exercised.

(16)
Includes 146,992 shares subject to outstanding options which are deemed exercised.

(17)
Includes 1,508,069 shares subject to outstanding opitons which are deemed exercised.

        NASI files annual, quarterly and current reports, proxy statements and other information with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The Securities and Exchange Commission allows us to "incorporate by reference" information into this joint proxy statement/prospectus, meaning that we can disclose important information by referring to another document filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The information incorporated by reference is deemed to be part of this joint proxy statement/prospectus. We refer you to "Where You Can Find More Information". These documents contain important information about NASI and its finances.

        NASI was originally incorporated under the Company Act of British Columbia, Canada, in 1987 and became a Delaware corporation on April 20, 1995. NASI's principal executive offices are located at 20200 Sunburst Street, Chatsworth, California 91311. NASI's telephone number is (818) 734-8600. NASI's website can be found at www.nasi.net. Information set forth in NASI's website is not incorporated herein by reference

68




INFORMATION REGARDING AM CAPITAL I, INC.

        AM Capital I, Inc. is a newly formed, wholly owned subsidiary of NASI, which was incorporated in Delaware for the sole purpose of effecting the merger, in which NOMOS will merge with and into AM Capital I, Inc. with AM Capital I, Inc. continuing as the surviving corporation. AM Capital I, Inc. will change its name immediately following the merger to "NOMOS Corporation". It engages in no other business. Its principal executive offices are presently located at 20200 Sunburst Street, Chatsworth, California 91311 and its telephone number is (818) 734-8600.


INFORMATION REGARDING NOMOS

        As used in this Section "Information Regarding NOMOS," references to "we", "us", "our" and "ours" refer to NOMOS and its consolidated subsidiaries.

Business

        NOMOS develops, sells and services advanced medical equipment products designed to improve the safety and effectiveness of external beam radiation therapy in the treatment of tumorous cancers. NOMOS' current products are designed to improve (1) the planning and delivery of radiation treatments, (2) the verification of tumor location and (3) the accuracy and predictability of radiation doses. NOMOS currently sells its products and services to hospitals and freestanding clinics primarily in the United States as well as in other countries. Its products are used at over 400 institutions, including some of the world's preeminent cancer institutions, and are currently used predominantly in the treatment of tumors of the prostate, head, neck and spinal cord. In addition to its products, NOMOS offers an experienced and knowledgeable customer support and operations staff and high-quality customer service.

        NOMOS pioneered the commercialization of a technology known as intensity modulated radiation therapy, or IMRT, in the early and mid-1990's. In contrast to conventional radiation therapy, in which the patient is treated with large, uniform beams, IMRT delivers many smaller radiation beams, with the intensity and angle of these radiation beams varied, or modulated, across the treatment target. This enables the doctor to deliver an elevated radiation dose to the tumor, while limiting the amount of radiation directed at nearby healthy tissue. As a result, IMRT provides the potential for improved outcomes by more effectively treating tumors, and for a better quality of life for patients.

        Treatment planning for IMRT is extremely complex due to the number of potential beam angles and intensities. NOMOS' IMRT planning software system, CORVUS, addresses this complexity through a technique called inverse planning. CORVUS prompts the doctor to specify the desired radiation dose outcome, both for the tumor and for the surrounding healthy tissue, and then generates a plan to achieve the desired outcome by testing and rejecting millions of potential beam intensities and angles. This is in contrast to conventional radiation planning and those competing IMRT planning systems that rely on a technique called forward planning, in which the doctor essentially builds a treatment plan through a manual, iterative process. NOMOS believes that its inverse planning approach results in better treatment plans and reduces the amount of time required for doctors to create these plans when compared to many of the treatment planning systems of NOMOS' competitors, including competing IMRT systems that use inverse planning techniques.

        A device known as a multileaf collimator defines the size, shape and intensity of the radiation beams in IMRT treatments and is also used in some conventional radiation treatments. NOMOS' multileaf collimator, MIMiC, was designed specifically for delivering IMRT, and NOMOS believes it offers a number of advantages over competing multileaf collimators, including the ability to deliver radiation from a significantly greater number of angles. MIMiC is primarily sold as a component of NOMOS' integrated PEACOCK system, but is also sold to existing CORVUS customers.

69



        Customers use IMRT products in conjunction with linear accelerators, which are the machines that generate the energy beams used in radiation therapy. NOMOS does not produce linear accelerators. However, its products are designed to be compatible with all linear accelerators currently sold by the major accelerator manufacturers. NOMOS sells its products both to customers who have the newest, most advanced linear accelerators and to customers with older linear accelerators that do not have IMRT capabilities.

        In 1998 NOMOS introduced BAT, an ultrasound-based targeting and organ locator system. BAT is used in conjunction with external beam radiation to locate targets, including tumors and surrounding organs that may move inside the patient's body from one treatment session to the next. In 2000, NOMOS introduced PEREGRINE, a radiation dose calculation and simulation software product that uses advanced statistical techniques to simulate the path of radiation particles as they are absorbed by the patient's body. BAT and PEREGRINE are designed to be used in connection with both IMRT and conventional radiation therapy.

        NOMOS recently launched NOMOS Rx, a remote IMRT treatment planning service. NOMOS Rx, working with a customer's on-site staff, retrieves image and/or plan data relating to a potential patient treatment, develops the IMRT plan, then sends the plan back to the customer for review, approval, quality assurance and delivery. NOMOS Rx provides a remote treatment planning alternative that makes IMRT feasible for many facilities that, due to staffing or financial constraints, might otherwise not be able to take advantage of the potential benefits of IMRT.

        We also have developed and sell several accessory products that are used in conjunction with our core products to enhance their functionality, creating additional market opportunities for us.

Market Opportunity

        The International Agency for Research on Cancer estimates that there were over 10 million cases of cancer worldwide in 2000, excluding skin cancers. Cancers are generally one of two types, tumorous or non-tumorous. Radiation therapy is the primary treatment option for localized tumorous cancers, and approximately 50% of cancer patients in the United States are treated with radiation at some time during the course of their disease. The primary customers in the United States for radiation therapy products are hospitals, which provide approximately two-thirds of domestic radiation treatments, and freestanding clinics, which provide approximately one-third of domestic radiation treatments.

        There are two primary types of radiation therapy. The first type, which represents the vast majority of radiation treatments, is external beam radiation therapy. In this type of radiation therapy, a beam of energy originating outside the patient's body is directed at the tumor. The second type of radiation therapy is internal radiation therapy, commonly referred to as brachytherapy, where radioactive materials are implanted in the patient's body at the site of the tumor. Our IMRT and related products are used in connection with external beam radiation therapy.

        IMRT has been recognized by participants in the radiation therapy industry, including other medical equipment manufacturers and radiation oncologists, as a significant development in radiation therapy. We believe that IMRT, in its current form, represents a significant improvement over conventional planning and delivery technologies for radiation therapy for treating many types of cancers. In conventional radiation therapy, the radiation beams tend to be larger, more uniform and more simply shaped than the beams used in IMRT. As a result, conventional radiation treatments have relatively imprecise targeting, which often results in exposing a significant amount of healthy tissue to directed radiation, and which places inherent limitations on the level of radiation doses that can be delivered. This is especially true in cases where the tumor has an irregular shape or is adjacent to a vital organ or other sensitive tissue. IMRT technology, by contrast, delivers radiation using many small beams aimed at different parts of a tumor and controls the radiation level of each beam. This enables the doctor to deliver higher doses of radiation to the tumor area while reducing the dose of radiation

70



directed at healthy, surrounding tissue. The result is an increase in the effectiveness of radiation therapy treatments and a reduction in side effects. For example, patients who undergo conventional radiation therapy to treat prostate cancer can often experience rectal bleeding, incontinence and impotence. We believe that IMRT can help reduce the incidence of these side effects in the treatment of prostate cancer. Similarly, we believe that patients who have tumors located near the optical nerve and who might be blinded by conventional treatment can now be treated with IMRT with significantly reduced risk of vision loss.

        An important component of our market opportunity is the ability of our integrated IMRT treatment planning and delivery product, PEACOCK, to upgrade a linear accelerator that does not have IMRT capabilities by providing it with the ability to deliver IMRT treatments. PEACOCK typically sells for less than half the cost of a new IMRT-equipped linear accelerator. In addition, we offer customers who have the newest, IMRT-equipped linear accelerators the opportunity to replace their existing planning system with our CORVUS planning system, which is compatible with most major multileaf collimators currently on the market, and which we believe is superior in a number of respects to the planning software offered by our competitors.

        Our image guided radiation therapy product, BAT, provides another important market opportunity, because it enables doctors to locate more accurately, at the time of each treatment, tumors that may have moved since the treatment plan was developed or since the prior treatment session. BAT has been predominantly used by hospitals and clinics in treating prostate cancer.

        We also believe that there is a significant market opportunity for our PEREGRINE dose calculation software, although we have limited data on this opportunity because we have only recently introduced PEREGRINE to the market.

        We estimate that there are approximately 4,400 installed linear accelerators worldwide that do not have IMRT capabilities. We view each of these linear accelerators as a potential sales opportunity for PEACOCK. We estimate that there are approximately 3,600 linear accelerators installed worldwide that do have IMRT capabilities, with hundreds more being installed annually, which we view as potential sales opportunities for CORVUS. We view each installed linear accelerator worldwide, whether it has IMRT capabilities or not, as a potential sale opportunity for BAT and PEREGRINE, as well as other new product offerings from NOMOS.

Business Strategy

        Our goal is to be the commercial and technological leader in the worldwide market for advanced radiation treatment planning and delivery products and services. The key elements of our strategy are to:

71


72


Technology and Products

        We currently sell five primary products and one service offering to the radiation therapy market:

• CORVUS   Inverse planning software designed specifically for IMRT

• MIMiC

 

Multileaf collimator designed specifically for IMRT with CORVUS

• PEACOCK

 

Integrated IMRT planning and delivery software system and multileaf collimator, which combines CORVUS and MIMiC

• BAT

 

An ultrasound-based targeting and organ locator system

• PEREGRINE

 

Radiation dose calculation and simulation software

• NOMOS Rx

 

Remote IMRT treatment planning service offering

        CORVUS.    The core of our proprietary IMRT planning system is CORVUS. This software-based product uses images from conventional imaging technologies, such as computed tomography, or CT, magnetic resonance imaging, or MRI, or positron emission tomography, or PET, to create a three-dimensional model of the tumor area to be treated. CORVUS, through its three-dimensional on-screen model, prompts the doctor to specify the parameters of the dose outcome desired, both for the tumor and for the surrounding healthy tissues. CORVUS then tests and rejects millions of beam intensities and angles as it builds a plan to achieve the doctor's desired objectives. This process, called inverse planning, starts with the desired outcome and then builds a plan to achieve it. Once the plan has been approved by the doctor, CORVUS manipulates the linear accelerator's multileaf collimator during each treatment session to provide the radiation output in accordance with the plan by dividing its radiation output into a large number of very small beams, each of which can carry a different level of radiation intensity. By hitting the target with these small, variable intensity beams from multiple angles, it becomes possible to deliver a high dose of radiation to the target with great precision, regardless of the shape of the target, while limiting the delivery of high dosage radiation to surrounding healthy structures, regardless of their proximity to the target. CORVUS can be used in conjunction with MIMiC, our multileaf collimator, and is also compatible with most other multileaf collimators on the market. Although there is no reliable independent market data available, we believe that the multileaf collimators with which CORVUS is currently compatible represent a substantial majority of all multileaf collimators in both the U.S. and the worldwide markets. We believe that CORVUS, together with its predecessor, PEACOCK Plan, has been used to plan the treatment of a substantial majority of all IMRT patients worldwide.

        We believe the CORVUS process of inverse planning is superior to conventional radiation technology and to competing IMRT technologies that rely on either forward planning or inverse planning. In forward planning, the doctor manually develops a radiation delivery plan and then uses a computer to calculate the results of that plan. This process is often repeated several times until an acceptable plan is obtained. This process is labor-intensive, time-consuming and highly sensitive to the quality and experience of the particular technician or doctor. All inverse planning systems, including those used by our competitors, utilize an algorithm that is designed to replicate the clinical decision-making process of a radiation oncologist. Our algorithm has been developed using clinical feedback received from previous versions of the product, and we believe it represents more closely than our competitors' systems the important factors used in an experienced clinician's evaluation. The CORVUS process results in increased accuracy and improved clinical outcomes over competing inverse planning systems, whose optimization strategies and evaluation functions we believe do not have the sophistication embodied in CORVUS. We also believe that our CORVUS planning software develops treatment plans more quickly and with less user interaction than our competitors' planning systems.

73



        MIMiC.    Our multileaf collimator, MIMiC, is primarily sold as a component of our integrated PEACOCK system, but can also be sold to existing CORVUS customers. MIMiC is the only multileaf collimator on the market that was designed exclusively for IMRT delivery. MIMiC was also the first multileaf collimator specifically designed for dynamic or rotational mode treatment, where the head of the linear accelerator is moving during the delivery of radiation. MIMiC can deliver radiation from approximately 54 angles, which is significantly greater than the 5-9 angles of a typical commercial multileaf collimator. This contributes to MIMiC's ability to conform the radiation beams to the size and shape of a tumor in accordance with the treatment plan. Leakage refers to radiation that escapes from the linear accelerator, or is transmitted through or between the leaves of the multileaf collimator, and is unintentionally absorbed by the patient. A typical multileaf collimator has an average radiation leakage of between 1% and 3%. The actual leakage for MIMiC is typically less than 1%. Although MIMiC can be retro-fitted to be used on many linear accelerators that come already equipped with a multi-leaf collimator, the primary market for MIMiC is for linear accelerators, many of them older machines, that do not have a multi-leaf collimator.

        MIMiC has 40 tungsten leaves in two rows of 20. Each leaf is capable of defining a beam approximately one centimeter square and can direct these radiation beams to the target. With the addition of our BEAK product, MIMiC's beam size can be reduced to four-by-ten millimeters. This allows a customer with MIMiC to compete in the radiosurgery market. Radiosurgery is a form of specialized radiation therapy that involves the delivery of radiation to a precise, often small target volume in a limited number of treatment sessions.

        PEACOCK.    Our integrated IMRT planning and delivery system, PEACOCK, includes CORVUS as its software-based planning component and MIMiC as its multileaf collimator. With these two components, PEACOCK helps the doctor create an optimized treatment plan and then modulates the intensity of a radiation beam to fit the size and shape of a tumor in accordance with the plan. PEACOCK offers customers with older linear accelerators, and others that lack a multileaf collimator, the ability to upgrade their accelerators to enable them to deliver IMRT treatments. PEACOCK typically sells for less than half the cost of a new IMRT-equipped linear accelerator and can be installed with significantly less down time to the treatment center. PEACOCK can be used in delivering IMRT treatments both while the head of the linear accelerator is moving, known as rotational or dynamic mode, and while the head of the linear accelerator is stationary, known as fixed-angle mode.

        BAT.    BAT uses ultrasound images to confirm the location of target organs and tumor sites within the patient's body. Some organs, such as the prostate, move within the patient from day to day and even within a given day. As a result, a previously developed treatment plan may no longer be effective. Treatments that require daily localization of this kind include those for cancers of the prostate, female pelvis, pancreas, breast and liver. The conventional approach to this problem is to include in the treatment plan a margin of error, which inevitably leads to exposing healthy tissue to radiation. BAT reduces this margin of error from the currently accepted standard practice of within 2 centimeters to within 2 millimeters. BAT determines the location of the target by means of a jointed, mechanical arm, at the end of which is an ultrasound probe. Using a touch-screen monitor and ultrasound images, the practitioner maneuvers the probe to the exact location of the tumor. BAT then calculates the position of the target relative to the delivery point of the radiation beam. BAT can be used in conjunction with IMRT as well as conventional radiation treatment. Currently, BAT is predominantly used by hospitals and clinics in treating prostate cancer.

        PEREGRINE.    Our radiation dosage calculation software product, PEREGRINE, uses technology that we license from the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. Fundamental to all treatment planning is the need to estimate the amount and distribution of the radiation dose in three dimensions that would be absorbed by a patient from a prescribed plan. The prevailing method of dose calculation is to estimate the absorption of radiation by the patient's body based on the absorption of radiation by

74



water. This method can be reasonably accurate for areas of homogeneous tissue. However, most tumors are surrounded by heterogeneous tissue structures, such as bones, air sacs or other variants in density, each of which absorbs radiation at a different rate. PEREGRINE is designed to improve the accuracy of both IMRT and conventional radiation treatment planning systems by adjusting for these variables.

        PEREGRINE utilizes advanced statistical techniques to provide highly precise dosage calculations, which it derives by simulating the paths of radiation particles as they are absorbed by the patient's body until sufficient statistics are built up to limit uncertainty. Before PEREGRINE was introduced, this method was considered impractical because of long calculation times. PEREGRINE is designed to make use of commercially available computing technology to achieve calculation times of less than ten minutes.

        PEREGRINE is designed to work both with our IMRT planning software, CORVUS, as well as with competitors' IMRT and conventional radiation therapy planning products. PEREGRINE is designed to work simultaneously and seamlessly with the planning software to calculate and recommend adjustments to the dose distribution determined by the planning software before the radiation treatment plan is actually administered to the patient. In 1999, we acquired exclusive rights to the patents, trademarks and copyrights for the technology used in PEREGRINE through a 10-year licensing agreement with the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory.

75


        We have made initial sales of PEREGRINE to early adopters who are currently using it for laboratory testing and research purposes. Only one is now using it to treat patients. These early adopters are assisting us in completing the final stages of development of this product. Currently, PEREGRINE can only be used in conjunction with some linear accelerators and treatment planning systems. Although there is no reliable independent market data available, we believe that PEREGRINE is currently compatible with linear accelerators that represent a majority of the U.S. market and a minority of the worldwide market. We are developing additional upgrades for PEREGRINE that we believe, when completed, will allow PEREGRINE to operate with a broader range of linear accelerators, energy levels and radiation planning systems. These upgrades are designed primarily to improve the installation and commissioning process, as opposed to the underlying software function, so as to make it easier for PEREGRINE customers to validate the correct operation of the system. We have reviewed these changes and do not believe these changes will require any new 510(k) clearance from the FDA. However, the FDA could disagree and require a submission of a 510(k) application.

        NOMOS Rx.    Our remote IMRT treatment planning service offering, NOMOS Rx, working with a customer's on-site staff, retrieves image and/or plan data relating to a potential patient treatment, develops the IMRT plan, then sends the plan back to the customer for review, approval, quality assurance, and delivery. NOMOS Rx is a service staffed by highly qualified individuals with extensive treatment planning experience. NOMOS products are utilized in providing this service. NOMOS Rx provides a remote treatment planning alternative that makes IMRT feasible for any facility, no matter what their staffing or financial constraints.

Accessory Products.    In addition to our core products discussed above, we also offer accessory products:

75


Competition

        The medical equipment product markets for radiation therapy are characterized by rapidly evolving technology and intense competition. Some of our competitors have greater financial, marketing and management resources than we do. We believe that the principal competitive factors in all of our markets include:

        IMRT Planning and Delivery Products.    Our most significant competitor for our IMRT planning and delivery products is Varian Medical Systems, Inc. Varian produces more linear accelerators than any other manufacturer and markets its own line of IMRT products, including several models of multileaf collimators. Varian also markets an IMRT inverse planning software package that it has developed in coordination with Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center. Siemens and Elekta are the other major manufacturers of linear accelerators, each of which offers its own multileaf collimators that compete with our MIMiC and PEACOCK products.

        Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Clinic has developed and treated a significant number of patients with its own non-commercial, non-FDA cleared, IMRT treatment and planning system. To our knowledge, Memorial Sloan-Kettering has yet to commercialize this technology or license it to third parties for commercialization.

        TomoTherapy Inc. is another company that has developed and obtained FDA 510(k) clearance for a product that incorporates IMRT delivery and imaging into one unit, including the radiation source. They claim that their product will be able to verify the precise position of the patient's tumor before each treatment, much like our fixation devices and our BAT product. To our knowledge, initial sales have been made to a few institutions and there is interest in this technology in the market.

        Several treatment planning companies, including ADAC Laboratories, Inc., which is a part of Royal Philips Electronics N.V., Computerized Medical Systems, Inc. and Nucletron have also introduced treatment planning systems that include IMRT capabilities.

        Several other companies, including BrainLAB AG, Zmed, Inc., 3Dline International srl and Siemens also compete with us in the multileaf collimator market.

        In addition to the competition we face from other producers of IMRT products, we continue to face competition from providers of brachytherapy and other conventional radiation treatment planning products. These providers include ADAC Laboratories, Varian, Computerized Medical Systems, Elekta

76



and Nucletron. We also face competition from companies developing, marketing and manufacturing alternative therapies to radiation for the treatment of tumorous cancers.

        Ultrasound Localization Products.    We are facing increasing competition for BAT. Companies such as Zmed and BrainLAB do market, or in the past have marketed, ultrasound localization devices. In addition, Computerized Medical Systems, Inc., recently introduced a product that will compete with BAT. Varian Medical Systems, Inc. recently acquired Zmed, Inc. We anticipate additional competition in the future as the market for this product continues to develop.

        Radiation Dose Calculation Products.    Due to the recent introduction of PEREGRINE, we have not faced any significant competition from products using similar, advanced statistical techniques. However, we do face competition in this market from conventional radiation dose calculation products. In addition, we anticipate that competition will develop in the future as the market for radiation dose calculation software develops.

Patents and Proprietary Technology

        We are committed to protecting our intellectual property. We have tried to obtain patents, when available, to protect the technologies, improvements and inventions that are significant to the development of our business. As of March 10, 2004, the United States Patent and Trademark Office had issued the following U.S. patents to us:

Name

  Patent
Number

  Subject
  Date of Issuance
  Expiration
Date

Method and apparatus for patient positioning for radiation therapy   5,622,187   A method and apparatus for positioning a patient upon a treatment table of a linear accelerator includes a camera secured to the gantry of the linear accelerator and a plurality of light emitting diodes mounted with respect to the patient which are viewed by the camera.   April 22, 1997   September 30, 2014

Planning method and apparatus for radiation dosimetry

 

6,038,283

 

A method and apparatus for determining an optimized radiation beam arrangement for applying radiation to a tumor target volume while minimizing radiation of a structure volume in a patient, which uses an iterative cost function based on a comparison of desired partial volume data, which may be represented by cumulative dose volume histograms and proposed partial volume data, which may be represented by cumulative dose volume histograms for target tumors and tissue structures for delivery of the optimized radiation beam arrangement to the patient by a conformal radiation therapy apparatus.

 

March 14, 2000

 

October 24, 2017
                 

77



Noninvasive head fixation method and apparatus

 

5,207,688

 

A noninvasive head fixation method and apparatus uses a flexible and compressible bladder which contacts and is deformed to conform to the shape of the patient's nasion in order to immobilize the patient's head during a medical procedure.

 

May 4, 1993

 

October 31, 2011

Tissue compensation method and apparatus

 

5,368,543

 

A tissue compensation system and method for making a tissue compensator utilizes a plurality of elongate rods, one end of which contact the treatment surface on the patient, and the other end of which contact and deform a flexible membrane containing a quantity of a material substantially equivalent to tissue of the patient.

 

November 29, 1994

 

June 17, 2013

Tissue compensation method and apparatus

 

5,242,372

 

A tissue compensation system and method for making a tissue compensator utilizes a plurality of elongate rods, one end of which contact the treatment surface on the patient, and the other end of which contact and deform a flexible membrane containing a quantity of a material substantially equivalent to tissue of the patient.

 

September 7, 1993

 

November 12, 2011

Method and apparatus for conformal radiation therapy

 

5,596,619

 

A method and apparatus for conformal radiation therapy, with a radiation beam having a pre-determined, constant beam intensity, treats the entire tumor volume of a patient's tumor, and the beam intensity of the radiation beam is spatially modulated across the tumor, by separating the radiation into a plurality of treatment beam segments and independently modulating the beam intensity of the plurality of radiation beam segments.

 

January 21, 1997

 

May 17, 2014
                 

78



Method and apparatus for conformal radiation therapy

 

5,802,136

 

A method and apparatus for conformal radiation therapy, with a radiation beam having a predetermined, constant beam intensity, treats the entire tumor volume of a patient's tumor, and the beam intensity of the radiation beam is spatially modulated across the tumor, by separating the radiation into an array of at least 3x3 treatment beam segments and independently modulating the beam intensity of the plurality of radiation beam segments.

 

September 1, 1998

 

April 19, 2016

Method and apparatus for target position verification

 

5,411,026

 

A method and apparatus for verifying the position of a lesion in a patient's body compares the location of the lesion in CT slices with the position of the lesion in ultrasound images taken while the patient lays on the treatment table of a linear accelerator.

 

May 2, 1995

 

October 8, 2013
                 

79



Planning method and apparatus for radiation dosimetry

 

6,393,096

 

A method and apparatus for determining an optimized radiation beam arrangement for applying radiation to a tumor target volume while minimizing radiation of a structure volume in a patient, comprising: using a computer to computationally obtain a proposed radiation beam arrangement; using the computer to computationally change the proposed radiation beam arrangement iteratively, incorporating a cost function at each iteration to approach correspondence of a CDVH associated with the proposed radiation beam arrangement to a CDVH associated with a pre-determined desired dose prescription; comparing the dose distribution to a prescribed dose for the tumor volume and surrounding tissue structures; and increasing or decreasing radiation beam intensity if the change of the proposed beam arrangement leads to a greater correspondence to the desired dose prescription to obtain an optimized radiation beam arrangement.

 

May 21, 2002

 

May 27, 2019

Method and apparatus for target position verification

 

6,325,758

 

A method and apparatus for verifying the position of a target to be treated by a radiation therapy device may include an ultrasound probe used to generate ultrasound images of the target; a position sensing system for indicating the position of the ultrasound probe with respect to the radiation therapy device, whereby the location of the target with respect to the radiation therapy device is known; and the ultrasound image of the target may be aligned with radiation treatment data.

 

December 4, 2001

 

October 27, 2018

        In addition, as of March 10, 2004, we had two additional U.S. patent applications pending and four patent applications were being prepared for filing in the U.S. We also had been issued seven foreign patents and had three international patent applications pending. Four foreign patent applications were in preparation for filing in various countries.

80



Third-Party License Agreements

        We license from third parties some of the technologies used in our core products. The following is a summary of our material third-party licenses.

Third-Party Reimbursement

        In the United States, healthcare providers that purchase medical equipment products like ours generally rely on governmental and private third-party payors to reimburse all or part of the cost of the

81



procedures for which the products are used. Therefore, decisions by third-party payors concerning our products or those of our competitors are likely to affect the attractiveness of our products compared with those of our competitors, thereby affecting our pricing and revenue.

        Effective January 1, 2001, Medicare began reimbursing hospitals for IMRT services furnished to program beneficiaries on an outpatient basis. For 2002, Medicare reimbursement rates available to hospitals could be up to four times higher, and Medicare reimbursement rates available to freestanding clinics could be up to five times higher than the reimbursement rates available for conventional radiation therapy treatments. There was a slight downward adjustment in the reimbursement rate for 2003. Medicare has also recently published reimbursement rates to be effective January 1, 2004 that are slightly lower than 2003 rates for IMRT. However, IMRT reimbursement still remains higher than conventional radiation treatment. Although these reimbursement amounts apply only to payments by the Medicare program, private third-party payors often adopt Medicare reimbursement policies and amounts. However, each private carrier establishes its own reimbursement policies and procedures, and we are aware that some private third-party payors regard IMRT as investigational or experimental and do not provide reimbursement for these services at all. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, or CMS, the federal agency responsible for administering the Medicare and Medicaid programs, reviews hospital payment rates annually. Future adjustments could lead to positive or negative payment amount changes.

        Outside the United States, reimbursement procedures and policies are country-specific. However, in countries where specific reimbursement codes are strictly required, reimbursement for treatments using our products is unavailable. We and our distributors are pursuing strategies to address reimbursement issues in foreign markets. In order to ensure continued success in this area, we intend to dedicate resources to pursue reimbursement strategies. We may also provide administrative support to physicians in other countries seeking reimbursement for the use of our products.

Manufacturing Assembly Operations

        We purchase all major components for our products from third-party suppliers. We perform system design, final product assembly, testing and packaging at our facility in Cranberry Township, Pennsylvania. We are required to meet and adhere to applicable requirements of United States and foreign regulatory agencies, including the Quality System Regulation of the FDA, the Medical Device Directive of the European Union, and the Medical Device Regulations of Canada.

        We generally produce our products based on firm orders and on anticipated additional orders that we are relatively confident will be obtained. Lead times for materials and components required by us vary significantly and depend on factors such as the specific supplier and the availability and demand for the applicable components. We do not currently have any long-term supply contracts, and our purchases are made on a purchase order basis.

        Currently, we utilize single source suppliers for a number of significant components for each of our major products. Of the ten suppliers representing our highest dollar volume in 2003, six (Precision Assembly, Terason Corporation, Dedicated Computing Inc., Fermer Precision, Immersion and Apple Computer, Inc.) represent sole source suppliers. Other suppliers exist for each of our components provided by single source suppliers. We have not in the past experienced any significant disruption in product availability because of single source suppliers, and we have in the past successfully transitioned from single source suppliers to new suppliers without significant disruptions in production. It is likely we will continue to change suppliers in the future as our products change and we look for ways to improve functionality and lower costs.

        We have streamlined our product assembly process to allow for increased flexibility to respond to changes in business volume. In this regard, we have cross-trained our employees to provide additional production flexibility to respond to shifts in demand. As product line sales fluctuate from month to

82



month, overlapping responsibilities and multi-tasked teams will enable us to provide quicker deliveries to customers while more effectively managing our costs.

Government Regulation

        Our products are medical devices and, therefore, are subject to regulation and oversight by the FDA and to regulation by foreign governmental authorities. We are also subject to state and local regulation. FDA and foreign regulatory requirements include registration as a manufacturer, licensing or registration of product, compliance with established manufacturing practices and quality standards, conformance with applicable industry standards, product traceability, adverse event reporting and compliance with advertising and packaging standards.

        In the United States, medical devices are classified into three different categories over which FDA applies increasing levels of regulation: Class I, Class II and Class III. The FDA has classified all of our products to date as Class II devices.

        We have received FDA clearance for all of our current IMRT, ultrasound targeting and treatment planning products, CORVUS, PEACOCK, MIMiC and BAT. We also received FDA clearance for PEREGRINE, our dose calculation software product, in 2000 and for our NOMOS AUTOCRANE product in 2001. We continuously evaluate our products for any required resubmission. Each of our products has its own individual indication for use statement that has been cleared by the FDA. All of these cleared indications specify that the products are cleared for use in prescribed external beam radiation therapy. None of the FDA clearances for any of our products limit the scope of intended use to treating certain types of cancer.

        As a participant in the healthcare industry, we are subject to extensive and frequently changing regulation under many other laws administered by governmental entities at the federal, state and local levels, some of which are, and others of which may be, applicable to our business. For example, our facilities are also licensed as a medical product manufacturing site by the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and are subject to periodic state regulatory inspections. Our healthcare service provider customers are also subject to a wide variety of laws and regulations that could affect the nature and scope of their relationships with us.

        We hold a certificate to ISO 9001/EN46001, and ISO/EN 13485 the European Union standard for medical product manufacturers. This certificate is a prerequisite to applying the CE Mark to our products. The CE Mark is required on all medical products sold and used in the European Union. It is also recognized by many countries outside the European Union, such as Australia. The CE Mark indicates that a product was designed, released, produced, sold and serviced using a system that complies with the EU Council Directive 93/42/ECC for medical devices. All NOMOS products are currently eligible to bear the CE Marking.

        Canada has a similar rating system to that of the FDA, although based on a four class system (Class I through Class IV). Health Canada has granted us Class II licenses to distribute our BAT, CORVUS and PEREGRINE products throughout Canada. In 2003, our BAT product was re-classified in Canada as a Class III device, and our license for this product has been amended accordingly. In October 2003, NOMOS was audited for compliance with the new requirements of the Canadian Medical Device Regulations and was found to be fully compliant. This allows us to sell our Class III products (PEACOCK and MIMiC) in Canada.

        Our products are also regulated outside the United States as medical devices by foreign governmental agencies, similar to the FDA, and are subject to regulatory requirements, similar to the FDA's, in the foreign countries in which we plan to sell our products. We rely exclusively on our foreign distributors to obtain the foreign regulatory approvals necessary to market our products outside of the United States, Canada and Europe.

83



Customers

        To date, we have sold our products to hospitals and freestanding clinics at over 400 sites in North America, Europe and Asia. Our products are being used by many of the leading cancer treatment hospitals and freestanding clinics in the United States, including, among others, the Cancer Therapy & Research Center in San Antonio, Texas, the Cleveland Clinic in Cleveland, Ohio, MD Anderson, Houston, Texas, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania and the Methodist Hospital, Baylor College of Medicine in Houston, Texas. Our current sales are distributed over a wide range of customers and we do not believe that we currently have any customer concentration problem in which a high percentage of our sales are made to only a few customers or hospital groups. In 2002 and 2003, we did not have any single customer that represented 10% or more of our total sales.

        We view any hospital or freestanding clinic that provides radiation therapy to be an important potential customer. We are also trying to penetrate independent health networks where buying decisions are made in a more centralized manner. These networks, which constitute a significant percentage of our target market, offer us the opportunity to make multiple sales through a single decision-making body. However, these networks are also volume purchasers and therefore tend to exert more leverage in obtaining discounts or other group pricing benefits. To date, a relatively small portion of our revenues has been derived from sales to these groups.

Employees

        As of March 10, 2004, we had 120 employees, 28 of whom have advanced degrees, including nine with Ph.D.s and one M.D. We have not experienced any work stoppages and consider our relations with our employees to be excellent. None of our employees is unionized or subject to a collective bargaining agreement. Currently, each of our employees has stock options, subject to a standard vesting schedule. Upon consummation of the merger, all outstanding unvested NOMOS stock options held by current NOMOS directors and employees will immediately vest.

        In addition to our employees, we have several independent contractor agreements with radiation oncologists, medical doctors and medical physicists to perform commissioning of our products throughout the United States and Canada.

Facilities

        We lease our facilities located in Cranberry Township, Pennsylvania. Our current space consists of approximately 35,000 square feet, of which approximately 10,000 square feet are dedicated to assembly, final testing and shipping, and customer support operations. The lease has a ten-year term with extension options and the option to obtain additional space within the building. All of our long-lived assets are located in the United States. We have approximately 26,000 square feet in our old facility which we are trying to sublease. The lease on this space runs until August 2004.

Legal Proceedings

        On December 28, 1998, we filed a complaint against BrainLAB USA, Inc. in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware for infringement of our U.S. Patent No. 5,411,026, which generally relates to ultrasound localization techniques for use with radiation therapy treatments. Our complaint was subsequently amended to add BrainLAB, Inc. as a defendant. In our complaint, we requested a court order prohibiting the further infringement of our patent and damages in an amount to be determined. In January 2003, the district court entered judgment against NOMOS on its infringement claims. We appealed this judgment to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. In February 2004, the circuit court upheld the district court's judgment and we filed a petition for rehearing in the circuit court. The defendants filed a post-trial motion in the district court seeking the reimbursement of their attorneys' fees, which they allege are in excess of $400,000. The district

84



court denied the motion, without prejudice, in view of our appeal. Our petition for rehearing was denied on March 11, 2004 and the district court will now reconsider this motion. The unfavorable outcome in this case could result in increased competition for our BAT product and reduced profit margins or sales.

        On October 18, 2002, two individual plaintiffs, Daniel Klimkowski and Nancy Klimkowski, filed a petition in Oklahoma County District Court against Mercy Health Center, Inc., Varian Medical Systems, Inc., NOMOS Corporation, Siemens Medical Corporation, Radiation Oncology Associates, Inc., Morris J. Weizenberg, M.D. and Gary L. Larson, M.D. alleging that the defendants caused Mr. Klimkowski to receive excess radiation in the treatment of his brain tumor. The plaintiffs sought compensatory and punitive damages in excess of $10,000. The plaintiffs asserted a manufacturer's product liability claim alleging that our PEACOCK system was defective, causing Mr. Klimkowski to receive an excessive amount of radiation to areas surrounding Mr. Klimkowski's tumor. The plaintiffs were unable to provide evidence that our PEACOCK system malfunctioned or was otherwise defective. As a result, our counsel filed a motion for summary judgment. The district court granted this motion and has dismissed the action against NOMOS. Although we do not anticipate an appeal, the plaintiffs still have a right to appeal. We will continue to pursue the defense of this case aggressively.

        On March 1, 2004, Parker/Hunter Incorporated, a regional investment banking firm, filed a complaint against us in the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County, Pennsylvania, seeking a declaratory judgment for a sum of approximately $2,250,000. Parker/Hunter alleges that we owe it this sum in connection with the proposed merger with NASI pursuant to the terms of an engagement letter with us dated June 2, 2000. The sum is based on the reported valuation of the transaction as of the execution date of the merger agreement. Management does not believe that there is any obligation to pay any amounts to Parker/Hunter and will vigorously defend itself against this claim. At this time, we are unable to estimate the likelihood of an unfavorable outcome in this case, or the amount of any damages in the event of an unfavorable outcome. Under the indemnification escrow agreement to be entered into between NASI, NOMOS and John A. Friede as stockholders representative, 307,617 shares of NASI common stock and $700,800 in cash otherwise payable to NOMOS stockholders in the merger will be deposited in a separate escrow fund as a source of reimbursement for any losses incurred by NASI or NOMOS prior to the consummation of the merger or by NASI after the consummation of the merger arising out of Parker/Hunter's claim. We refer you to the section entitled "The Merger Agreement—Escrow Arrangements; Indemnification Escrow Agreement" in this joint proxy statement/prospectus.

85


Management's Discussion and Analysis of NOMOS' Financial Condition and Results of Operations

        You should read the following discussion and analysis in conjunction with the section entitled "Summary Selected Historical Financial Information" and our financial statements and the related notes included elsewhere in this joint proxy statement/prospectus. This discussion contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Our actual results and the timing of selected events could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements, including as a result of those matters set forth under "Risk Factors," and elsewhere in this joint proxy statement/prospectus.

Overview

        We develop, sell and service advanced medical equipment products that are designed to improve the safety and effectiveness of radiation therapy in the treatment of tumorous cancers. We currently sell our products to hospitals and freestanding clinics in the United States and in other countries. Our products improve the planning and delivery of radiation treatment, the verification of target location, and the accuracy and predictability of radiation doses. We also offer our customers an experienced and knowledgeable customer support staff and high-quality customer service.

        We have been in existence since 1979. However, we have only had significant operations in the radiation therapy market since 1994. Since that time, we have devoted substantially all of our resources to research and development activities and establishing market demand for our products. As of December 31, 2003 we had an accumulated deficit of $79.5 million and net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $58.3 million. In 2003, 2002, and 2001 we had net losses of $1.8 million, $2.1 million and $583,000 respectively.

        Our revenue growth and operating results have depended on and will depend on the continued acceptance of our products by doctors, hospitals and freestanding clinics and patients and our ability to maintain prices for our products at levels that provide favorable margins. The rate of acceptance is influenced by the performance and pricing of our products, medical reimbursement rates for treatments utilizing our products, our relationships with key physicians, medical physicists, hospitals and other factors. Manufacturers typically sell their radiation treatment devices at discounts to list prices in order to expand their installed base of products, thereby increasing the market for their products and services. Similarly, we offer and expect to continue to offer discounts on our products in order to establish an installed base of systems from which we expect to generate additional revenues from selling related and accessory products and recurring revenues from service agreements, maintenance and upgrades. In the past, we have not generated significant revenues from sales to independent health networks, which are large buying networks with volume purchasing power. Increased sales to these groups in the future may result in additional negotiated price discounts, putting pressure on our product margins.

        Market acceptance and demand for IMRT products increased beginning in late 2000 due in part to the establishment of Medicare reimbursement for IMRT treatments performed in hospitals, which was announced in late 2000 and became effective on January 1, 2001 and by the establishment of reimbursement for IMRT treatments performed in freestanding clinics, which was announced in late 2001 and became effective on January 1, 2002.

        Revenues are generated from sales of our products and service of our products. We had total revenues, including service revenues, of $29.0 million in 2003, $31.1 million in 2002, and $24.5 million in 2001. Product sales accounted for approximately 68% of our total revenues in 2003, approximately 78% of our total revenues in 2002 and approximately 82% of our total revenues in 2001. Revenue from sales of our IMRT planning and delivery products, CORVUS, PEACOCK and MIMiC, represented approximately 29% of our total revenues in 2003, approximately 36% of our total revenues in 2002, and approximately 35% of our total revenues in 2001. Revenue from our ultrasound-based targeting and

86



organ locator system, BAT, which was first introduced in 1998, represented approximately 39% of our total revenues in 2003, approximately 40% of our total revenues in 2002, and approximately 43% of our total revenues in 2001.

        Product revenues totaled $19.8 million, $24.3 million, and $20.0 million in 2003, 2002, and 2001, respectively. The $4.6 million decrease, or 19%, decrease in product revenue in 2003 as compared to 2002 was primarily attributable to decreased unit sales in our IMRT planning and delivery products, reduced sales of optional accessory products sold with our IMRT planning and delivery systems and decreases in average selling prices for all products due to a competitive market, as partially offset by increased unit sales in our ultra-sound based organ locator systems. The $4.3 million, or 21%, increase in product revenue in 2002 as compared to 2001 was primarily attributable to increased unit sales in both the higher priced complete IMRT planning and delivery systems and ultrasound-based organ locator systems, additional sales of optional accessory products sold with IMRT planning and delivery systems and modest increases in average selling prices for all products, as partially offset by decreased unit sales in certain of our IMRT software products.

        Our service revenues accounted for approximately 32% of our total revenues in 2003, approximately 22% of our total revenues in 2002, and approximately 18% of our revenues in 2000. Service revenues are generated from three sources: (1) an allocated portion of our initial product sales, (2) pursuant to service agreements with our customers, and (3) from services provided on a time-and-materials basis. Service agreements are typically sold to customers at the expiration of our standard 12-month warranty period. In some cases we sell these service agreements at the time of the initial product sale. Our current sales terms for product sales and service agreements sold along with a product typically provide for customer payment of 30% on order placement, 60% on shipment and 10% on customer acceptance, which by the terms of our sales agreements occurs no later than 30 days after installation. Renewals or upgrades are typically fully invoiced on order.

        We have historically sold products directly to customers in the United States and Canada through our domestic sales force. Our sales outside of the United States and Canada, which have been limited to date, have been made primarily through our international partners and distributors, and this will continue to be a component of our foreign sales strategy. In 2003, approximately 2% of our product revenues, and 2% of our total revenues were derived from sales of customers outside the United States and Canada. In 2002, approximately 3% of our product revenues, and 2% of all revenues, were derived from sales to customers outside the United States and Canada. In 2001, approximately 5% of our product revenues, and 5% of all revenues, were derived from sales to customers outside the United States and Canada. In late 2002 and early 2003 we expanded our international operations opening and staffing a sales office in Europe and a representative office in the People's Republic of China. Consequently, we anticipate that international revenues will increase as a percentage of revenues in the future. If international sales increase, we may not experience corresponding growth in operating income. Our sales outside the United States and Canada have had, and will likely continue to have, lower margins due to distributor discounts and higher service costs.

        Our cost of revenues consists of direct costs incurred in the manufacture, installation and service of our products, including salaries and related personnel expenses, warranties, product component purchases and royalties payable under technology licenses. We intend to continue to make efforts to reduce our costs of revenues through product design changes, and manufacturing and vendor reductions in the cost of components. We anticipate that this will help to partially offset any price pressures we might face from competition. Margins on our product sales vary among products and, due to the variety of discounting options, among various sales of the same product, and will likely change over time.

        Each of our products comes with a standard twelve-month warranty, the term of which begins upon acceptance of the product by the customer. Qualified vendors supply the components for our

87



products, and we assemble and conduct final testing of our products at our facility in Cranberry Township, Pennsylvania. We establish estimated warranty obligations upon the sale of our hardware products, based upon our historical claims experience and actual costs.

        Research and development expenses include costs associated with the design, development, testing and enhancement of our products. These costs consist primarily of salaries and related personnel expenses, fees paid to outside service providers, expenditures for purchases of supplies and clinical trials and overhead allocated to product development.

        Periodically, our research and development efforts include the use of outside service providers on specific projects. Costs and fees associated with these non-recurring projects can cause significant variability in our quarterly research and development expenses. Our research and development efforts and related costs included in our statement of operations in this joint proxy/registration statement are generally focused on developing enhancements and adding features and functionality that allow our existing products to effectively be used to treat cancers associated with additional disease sites. Recent efforts have included product redesign and additional software functionality for our ultrasound-based organ locator product and added functionality for our IMRT treatment planning software. Our major ongoing efforts remain largely focused on further extending the utility, features and functionality of our ultrasound organ locator product and our IMRT treatment planning system products. Recent developments have allowed BAT to be used in certain clinical situations in the treatment of liver and breast cancer, in addition to prostate cancer. Ongoing efforts for BAT development are focused on expanding its use for positioning head and neck patients and eventually to monitor patient movement during treatment. Recent and ongoing efforts in IMRT development are expected to substantially modify the treatment planning process for our customers and are also expected to permit treatment of breast cancer and other difficult to treat cancer sites. Strategically we believe that this may enable us to expand the market for our products rather than to simply maintain the existing revenue base. Significant investment in research and development has been, and we believe that it will continue to be, necessary to enhance existing products, develop new products and to allow us to generate new product sales to further penetrate and expand our geographic markets.

        Sales and marketing and general and administrative expenses consist primarily of salaries, commissions and related expenses for personnel engaged in sales, marketing, customer support and administrative functions, costs associated with advertising, promotional and other marketing activities, tradeshow expenses, legal and auditing expenses, regulatory fees and general corporate expenses. We expect to continue to increase our investment in sales and marketing to allow us to further penetrate and expand our geographic markets and relationships with international distributors and other medical equipment manufacturers.

        We underwent a significant corporate restructuring in the fourth quarter of 1999 and in 2000, when our current management decided to divest the operations of our subsidiary, Radiation Oncology Computer Systems, Inc, or ROCS, which we acquired under previous management in January 1999. As a result of this decision, all revenue and costs related to the ROCS operations in 1999 and 2000 have been reported as discontinued operations. The loss from discontinued operations was $7.0 million in 1999, which included the write-off of all of the then unamortized goodwill of approximately $3.5 million, and $1.2 million in 2000. In 2000, we wrote off $3.0 million, which we had advanced pursuant to an acquisition agreement with Med-Tec Iowa, Inc. and which advance was in dispute as the acquisition never materialized. In 2003 we settled litigation that we he had initiated against Med-Tec and received $1.25 million from the former owner of Med-Tec which has been recorded as other income.

        In January 1999 we obtained a line of credit with Citicorp Private Bank for up to $10.0 million which was later increased to $14.0 million. In December 2000, the debt outstanding on this line of credit (in the amount of approximately $14.2 million, including accrued interest) was purchased from

88



Citicorp by our largest stockholder and members of his family. During 2000, we borrowed an additional approximately $3.8 million from this family group. In consideration of these loans, we issued to this family group approximately 40,102 shares of preferred stock as a fee for these loans. In March 2001 we converted all amounts owed to this family group, approximately $18.3 million, into preferred stock. In March 2001, we also raised approximately $4.7 million in a private placement of additional convertible preferred stock.

        Our net loss available to common stockholders has been increased by the stated value of preferred dividends and accretion charges, which over time increase the carrying amount of our redeemable preferred stock to the amount we would be required to pay if the preferred stock would be redeemed.

Critical Accounting Policies

Revenue Recognition

        We recognize revenues on all of our products only if persuasive evidence of an agreement exists, the contract price is fixed and determinable, collection of the amount due from the customer is deemed probable and all of our significant obligations are satisfied.

        We recognize revenues and related cost of revenues for our software intensive products, CORVUS, PEACOCK and PEREGRINE, at the time of customer acceptance, which normally occurs at installation. Our standard sales contract for these products includes maintenance services for twelve months. Accordingly, we defer and amortize over such twelve-month period recognition of revenue with respect to the portion of the purchase price that we charge when such services are sold separately.

        We recognize revenues and related cost of revenues for hardware intensive products, BAT and MIMiC, upon shipment (when title passes), which precedes customer acceptance. Our standard sales contract for these products includes installation services and a twelve-month warranty period. The performance of installation obligations is perfunctory. We record as a cost of revenues our estimated cost of installation and warranty based upon our historical experience. Because revenues from these products are recognized upon shipment and not upon final customer acceptance, it is possible that if products shipped and recognized as revenue are ultimately not accepted and paid for by the customer, any revenue recognized would have to be reversed in subsequent periods. We have limited experience of this occurring. However, in the fourth quarter of 2003 one customer was unable to secure adequate financing to cover its purchase commitment and another customer would not pay for its contractual obligation. As a result, we wrote off net receivables in the amount of $215,000. Additionally, because our warranty obligation is based on historical experience, actual expenses could differ from those estimates.

        We recognize revenues from our services agreements monthly on a straight-line basis, over the life of the agreement. Customers who purchase services on a time-and-material basis are billed and revenue is recognized as the service is provided. We believe our terms are similar to those of our competitors.

Research and Development Costs

        Research and development expenses, including software development expenses, are charged to expense when incurred. We have defined technological feasibility for software at the point where the FDA clearance is received and beta testing is completed. As such, we typically incur insignificant amounts of software costs subsequent to technological feasibility.

Stock-Based Compensation

        We have elected to follow Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees (APB 25), and related interpretations for our employee stock options. Under APB 25, we did not recognize any compensation expense related to the issuance of employee stock

89



options because the exercise price equaled the market price of the underlying stock at the date of grant. However, in December 2000 we repriced the exercise price of 897,640 outstanding employee and director stock options to $.99 per share, resulting in variable accounting treatment of these grants. This action was taken to retain the personnel talent that we considered necessary to achieve our goals. Changes in the estimated fair value of our stock through the exercise date, or expiration, of the repriced options will result in compensation expense to the extent that the exercise price is exceeded by the fair value of our stock.

        A total of 293,832 of the repriced options remained outstanding as of December 31, 2003. Approximately 367,512 of the options that were exercised were not vested at the time of exercise. Our board of directors permitted these unvested options to be exercised on the condition that the option holders enter into share repurchase agreements that subjected the acquired shares to repurchase by us until such time as the options would have vested. Approximately 182,318 of these restricted shares vested on December 15, 2001 and the remainder these restricted shares vested in August 2002. These shares were also treated on a variable basis with changes in the fair market value of the shares, increasing or decreasing compensation expense through vesting dates.

Income Taxes

        Deferred income taxes are recognized for all temporary differences between tax and financial bases of our assets and liabilities, using the tax laws and statutory rates applicable to the periods in which the differences are expected to affect taxable income. As of December 31, 2003, we had net operating loss carryforwards and federal research tax credit carryforwards available to offset future taxable income in the amounts of $58.3 million and $2.6 million, respectively. Approximately 51% of the net operating loss carryforwards will expire between 2007 and 2012 and 49% between 2018 and 2023, if not utilized. Approximately 31% of the tax credit carryforwards will expire between 2007 and 2012 and 69% between 2018 and 2023, if not utilized. Federal and state tax rules impose substantial restrictions on the utilization of net operating loss and tax credit carryforwards in certain situations where changes occur in the stock ownership of a company. Prior to the consummation of the merger, utilization of our carryforwards is currently estimated to be limited to approximately $1.4 million per year because of past ownership changes, which could effectively cap the amount of carryforwards that we can utilize at approximately one-half the total amount of such carryforwards. A future change in ownership such as the proposed merger, could further limit the utilization of these carryforwards.

        These net operating losses, tax credits and other future net deductible temporary differences result in deferred tax assets of $26.6 million at December 31, 2003. Because of our lack of historic profitability we have provided a valuation allowance that completely eliminates the carrying value of these tax benefits. We will maintain the valuation allowance until we believe that taxable income will be produced on a consistent basis.

Results of Operations

Year ended December 31, 2003 and December 31, 2002

        Total Revenues.    Total revenues for the year ended December 31, 2003 were $29.0 million compared to $31.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2003, a decrease of $2.1 million or 6.8%. The decrease in revenue was the result of reduced sales of our products partially offset by additional service revenues on our increased installed product base. Revenues from product sales decreased to $19.8 million in the year ended December 31, 2003 from $24.3 million in the year ended December 31, 2002, representing a decrease of $4.6 million, or 18.7%. Approximately 28% of the decrease was attributable to a decrease in unit sales and prices charged for treatment planning systems, approximately 54% of the decrease was attributable to a decrease in unit sales and prices of delivery systems products, and approximately 18% was attributable to a decrease in unit sales and prices of

90


image guided radiation therapy products. The decreased product revenues are attributable to the general economic downturn and increased competition. Revenues from services increased to $9.2 million in the year ended December 31, 2003 from $6.8 million in the year ended December 31, 2002, representing an increase of $2.4 million, or 36.1%. As a percent of total revenues, revenues from services increased to 31.8% in the year ended December 31, 2003 from 21.8% in the year ended December 31, 2002, due to increasing revenue from service contracts and upgrades on our continually increasing installed product base.

        Stock-based Compensation.    Stock-based compensation expense in the amount of $2.3 million was recorded in the year ended December 31, 2003 to reflect the increase in the estimated fair market value of our common stock related to the outstanding director and employee options that were repriced in December 2000. Stock-based compensation expense in the amount of $52,000 was recorded in 2002 reflecting the amortization of deferred expense as partially offset by the impact of an adjustment in the estimated fair market value of our common stock.

        Cost of Revenues.    Changes in the components of cost of revenue other than stock-based compensation was $14.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2003 as compared to $14.5 million for the year ending December 31, 2002, representing a slight decrease of $46,000 or 0.3% from 2002 to 2003. As a percent of total revenues, the cost of revenues for the year ended December 31, 2003 increased to 49.7% from 46.4% for the year ended December 31, 2002. The increase in cost of revenue as a percentage of revenue in the year ended December 31, 2003 compared to the same period in 2002 was due in part to a change in the mix of products sold and increased competition resulting in lower average selling prices. Gross profit for the year ended December 31, 2003 decreased to $14.6 million from $16.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2002, a decrease of $2.1 million, or 12.4%. Gross profit as a percentage of revenues declined to 50.3% for the year ended December 31, 2003 from 53.6% for the year ended December 31, 2002.

        Research and Development Expenses.    Changes in the components of research and development expenses other than stock-based compensation decreased to $4.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2003 from $5.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2002, representing a decrease of $600,000, or 11.3%. This decrease was primarily attributable to a reduction in headcount and outside professional fees on development efforts completed in 2002 as we strategically focused our product development efforts on treatment planning and image guided radiation therapy systems. As a percent of total revenues, research and development expenses were 16.4% and 17.3% for the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively.

        Sales and Marketing Expenses.    Changes in the components of sales and marketing expenses other than stock-based compensation were $6.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2003, compared to $6.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2002, representing an increase of $89,000 or 1.3%. This increase resulted primarily from the additional costs associated with the starting up of international operations in both Europe and the People's Republic of China in the fourth quarter of 2002 as offset by decreases in commissions paid to sales personnel because of the lower product domestic sales in 2003. As a percent of total revenues, sales and marketing expenses were 23.3% and 21.4% for the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively.

        General and Administrative Expenses.    Changes in the components of general and administrative expenses other than stock-based compensation decreased to $3.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2003 from $4.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2002, representing a decrease of $426,000, or 10.2%. The decrease in expenses was a result of decreases in legal expenses related to patent litigation and third-party reimbursement issues, as partially offset by an increase in bad debt expense of $376,000. As a percent of total revenues, general and administrative expenses were 13.0% and 13.5% for the years ending December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively.

91



        Offering, Relocation and Merger Costs.    Offering, Relocation and Merger costs of $610,000 in 2003 repesented professional fees related to the planned merger with North American Scientific. Offering and relocation costs of $2.3 million were recorded in 2002. Approximately $1.7 million of these costs related to our unsuccessful attempt at an initial public offering in 2002 and the remainder relates to the remaining monthly lease payments on our vacated prior facility.

        Interest and Other Income (Expense), Net.    Net interest and other income totalled $1.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2003, representing an increase of $1.7 million from the net interest and other income of $71,000 for the year ended December 31, 2002. Other income for the year ended December 31, 2003 included legal settlements totaling $1.75 million. Interest income results from interest earned on cash and cash equivalents and was $61,000 for the year ended December 31, 2003 as compared to $71,000 for the year ended December 31, 2002. The decline in interest income was primarily due to a decline in interest rates and lower average balances of cash and cash equivalents.

Years Ended December 31, 2002 and 2001

        Total Revenues.    Total revenues increased to $31.1 million in 2002 from $24.5 million in 2001, representing an increase of $6.6 million, or 27.0%. This increase in revenue was the result of additional sales of all products except treatment planning systems, and additional service revenue in 2002 on an increased installed product base. Revenues from product sales increased to $24.3 million in 2002 compared to $20.0 million in 2001, representing an increase of $4.3 million, or 21.3%. Approximately 82% of the increase was attributable to an increase in sales of delivery systems products and approximately 42% was attributable to an increase in sales of image guided radiation therapy products. These increases were partially offset by a decline in the sales of our treatment planning systems The increased product revenues were attributable to increased sales and marketing efforts, the increased acceptance of both our BAT product and IMRT in the marketplace and the new Medicare reimbursement code for IMRT that became effective in 2002. Revenues from services increased to $6.8 million in 2002 from $4.4 million in 2001, representing an increase of $2.3 million, or 52.1%. As a percent of total revenues, revenues from sales of services increased to 21.8% in 2002 from 18.1% in 2001, due to the proportionately higher increase in overall service revenues.

        Stock-based Compensation.    Stock-based compensation expense in the amount of $52,000 was recorded in 2002 as compared to $2.4 million in 2001. The decrease of $2.4 million reflects a reduction in the estimated fair market value of our common stock related to the outstanding director and employee options that were repriced in December 2000.

        Cost of Revenues.    Changes in the components of cost of revenue other than stock-based compensation increased to $14.5 million in 2002 from $11.7 million in 2001, representing an increase of $2.8 million, or 24.0%. As a percent of total revenues, cost of revenues decreased to 46.4% in 2002 from 47.6% in 2001. The decrease in cost of revenues as a percent of revenue in 2002 compared to 2001 was due primarily to the reduction of product cost through improved engineering design and product assembly methods. Gross profit increased to $16.7 million in 2002 from $12.8 million in 2001, representing an increase of $3.9 million, or 29.8%. Gross profit as a percent of revenues increased to 53.6% in 2002 from 52.4% in 2001.

        Research and Development Expenses.    Changes in the components of research and development expenses other than stock-based compensation increased to $5.4 million in 2002 from $4.1 million in 2001, representing an increase of $1.2 million, or 29.8%. This increase was primarily attributable to increases in headcount and related costs associated with the development of all of our product lines. As a percent of total revenues, research and development expenses were 17.3% in 2002 and 16.9% in 2001.

92



        Sales and Marketing Expenses.    Changes in the components of sales and marketing expenses other than stock-based compensation increased to $6.7 million in 2002, from $4.0 million in 2001, representing an increase of $2.7 million, or 67.2%. This increase was associated with advertising, marketing activities and other spending associated with the launch of our brand imaging campaign and recruiting and hiring of additional personnel, increased travel costs primarily attributable to our growing sales and marketing force. As a percent of total revenues, sales and marketing expenses were 21.4% in 2002 and 16.3% in 2001.

        General and Administrative Expenses.    Changes in the components of general and administrative expenses other than stock-based compensation increased to $4.2 million in 2002 from $3.0 million in 2001, representing an increase of $1.2 million or 42.1%. The increase in expenses was a result of increased professional fees associated with our BAT patent and other litigation and additional personnel costs related to increased headcount. As a percent of total revenues, general and administrative expenses increased to 13.5% in 2002 from 12.0% in 2001.

        Offering, Relocation and Merger Costs.    Offering, relocation and merger costs of $2.5 million were recorded 2002. Approximately $1.7 million of these costs related to our unsuccessful attempt at an initial public offering in 2002 and the remainder relates to the remaining monthly lease payments on our vacated Sewickley facility.

        Interest and Other Income (Expense), Net.    Net interest and other income decreased to $71,000 in 2002, from $103,000 in 2001, representing a decrease of $32,000, or 31.0%. Interest income for 2002 decreased due to lower average cash and cash equivalents balances attributable to cash used in operations.

Years Ended December 31, 2001 and 2000

        Total Revenues.    Total revenues increased to $24.5 million in 2001 from $13.4 million in 2000, representing an increase of $11.1 million, or 83.4%. This increase in revenue was the result of additional sales of all products, the introduction and sale of dose calculation product, PEREGRINE, and additional service revenue in 2001 on an increased installed product-base. Revenues from product sales increased to $20.0 million in 2001 compared to $10.8 million in 2000, representing an increase of $9.3 million, or 85.8%. Approximately 59% of the total increase in product sales from 2000 to 2001 was attributable to an increase in sales of our BAT product. Approximately 29% of the total increase was attributable to an increase in sales of our IMRT treatment planning and delivery systems. The remaining increase in product sales was attributable to sales of PEREGRINE. The increased product revenues are attributable to increased sales and marketing efforts, the increased acceptance of both our BAT product and IMRT in the marketplace and the new Medicare reimbursement code for IMRT. Revenues from services increased to $4.5 million in 2001 from $2.6 million in 2000, representing an increase of $1.9 million, or 73.3%. As a percentage of revenues, revenues from sales of services decreased to 18.2% in 2001 from 19.3% in 2000, due to the increase in overall product revenues.

        Stock-based Compensation.    In 2001, stock-based compensation expense in the amount of $2.4 million was recorded to reflect the vested portion of the excess fair market price of our common stock over the exercise price of the outstanding director and employee options that were repriced in December 2000.

        Cost of Revenues.    Changes in the components of cost of revenue other than stock-based compensation increased to $11.7 million in 2001 from $6.7 million in 2000, representing an increase of $5.0 million, or 73.6%. As a percentage of revenues, the cost of revenues decreased to 47.6% in 2001 from 50.3% in 2000. The decrease in cost of revenue as a percentage of revenue in 2001 compared to 2000 was due primarily to the reduction of product cost through improved engineering design and manufacturing assembly methods.

93


        Gross Profit.    Gross profit increased to $12.8 million in 2001 from $6.6 million in 2000, representing an increase of $6.2 million, or 93.3%. Gross profit as a percentage of revenues increased to 52.4% in 2001 from 49.7% in 2000. The increase in gross profit margin in 2001 compared to 2000 was due primarily to the reduction of product cost through improved engineering design and manufacturing assembly methods.

        Research and Development Expenses.    Changes in the components of research and development expenses other than stock-based compensation decreased to $4.2 million in 2001 from $4.5 million in 2000, representing a decrease of $0.3 million, or 7.3%. This decrease was primarily attributable to a reduction in the use of outside services in the development of PEREGRINE, partially offset by the hiring of additional personnel and the purchase of materials and supplies used in new product development efforts. As a percent of total revenues, research and development expenses were 16.9% in 2001 and 33.5% in 2000.

        Selling and Marketing Expenses.    Changes in the components of selling and marketing expenses other than stock-based compensation increased to $4.0 million in 2001, from $4.3 million in 2000, representing a decrease of $0.3 million, or 6.3%. This decrease was associated with lower personnel costs. As a percent of total revenues, sales and marketing expenses were 16.3% in 2001 and 31.8% in 2000.

        General and Administrative Expenses.    Changes in the components of general and administrative expenses other than stock-based compensation decreased to $3.0 million in 2001 from $3.3 million in 2000, representing a decrease of $0.3 million or 10.5%. The decrease in expenses was a result of a reduction in personnel costs related to a reorganization and related expenses and a reduction in bad debt expense, partially offset by increased legal costs associated with patent infringement lawsuits we initiated. As a percent of total revenues, general and administrative expenses decreased to 12.0% in 2001 from 24.7% in 2000.

        Interest and Other Income (Expense), Net.    Net interest and other income of $0.1 million in 2001 increased $5.1 million from net interest and other expense of $5.0 million in 2000, which included a $3.0 million write-off related to the aborted acquisition of Med-Tec. Interest income results from interest earned on cash and cash equivalents, while interest expense is associated with borrowings under lines of credit and capital lease obligations. Interest income for 2001 increased due to higher average cash and cash equivalents balances, resulting from the net proceeds of a private equity offering completed in March 2001. Interest expense for 2000 resulted from borrowings under a bank line of credit.

        Provision for Income Taxes.    For the year ended December 31, 2001 we had net operating loss carryforwards sufficient to offset our taxable income, and for the year ended December 31, 2000, we incurred a net operating loss. Accordingly, we did not pay any federal or state income taxes in either 2001 or 2000. We have not recorded a benefit from our net operating loss carryforwards because it is not certain that we will have sufficient income from future operations to realize the carryforwards prior to their expiration. Accordingly, we have established a valuation allowance against the deferred tax asset arising from the carryforwards.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

        Since our inception, we have financed our operations primarily through a combination of revenues from operations and private placements of common stock and convertible preferred stock. To conserve cash, we have also settled certain obligations with equity instruments. During 2001 and 2000 we issued preferred and common stock with an estimated fair market value of $65,000 and $955,000, respectively, to pay interest and financing expenses and a litigation settlement. Since that time we have not settled any obligations with equity instruments. Through December 31, 2003, issuances of our common stock

94



and convertible preferred stock had resulted, in the aggregate, in net proceeds of approximately $72.5 million. We have also financed our operations through loans from banks, including Citicorp Private bank, and from our chairman and largest stockholder, John A. Friede, and members of his family. All of these loans have been repaid or converted into common stock or preferred stock. The interest rates charged on these borrowings ranged between 9.5% and 14% per annum from 1999 to 2001. In addition, we issued approximately 40,102 shares of preferred stock to Mr. Friede as consideration for direct loans he or members of his family made to us. As of December 31, 2000, December 31, 2001, December 31, 2002 and December 31, 2003 we had cash and cash equivalents of $0.7 million, $6.0 million, $3.3 million and $3.1 million, respectively.

        Net cash used for or provided by operating activities during the periods presented are as follows:

Net cash provided by (used for) operating activities, in thousands

Year Ended
December 31,
2000

  Year Ended
December 31,
2001

  Year Ended
December 31,
2002

  Year
Ended
December 31,
2003

$(6,544)   $831   $(2,293)   $1,080

        The significant amount of cash that was used for operating activities during the year ended December 31, 2000, was primarily the result of the reduced amount of revenues that were being generated during this period compared to the cost of the infrastructure that was in place.

        During the year ended December 31, 2001, revenues increased significantly as our customers began to receive favorable reimbursement from both CMS and third party insurance providers that accelerated the recovery of their investment in our primary products.

        The cash used for operating activities during the year ended December 31, 2002, was primarily the result of $2.5 million in costs related to our unsuccessful attempt to become public as the IPO market condition significantly deteriorated during the year, and to the incremental costs associated with the move to our new corporate headquarters to support our continued growth.

        The cash provided by operating activities during the year ended ended December 31, 2003, was primarily a result of favorable litigation settlements totaling $1.75 million which was included in other income during 2003.

        As of December 31, 2003, NOMOS had net receivables of $6.7 million, which consisted of $6.0 million in net billed receivables and $724,000 in unbilled receivables. At of December 31, 2002, NOMOS had net receivables of $7.2 million, which consisted of $6.1 million in net billed receivables and $1.1 million in unbilled receivables. At December 31, 2001, NOMOS had net receivables of $4.7 million, which consisted of $3.9 million in net billed receivables and $787,000 in unbilled receivables. Net receivables at December 31, 2003 had decreased by $473,000 since December 31, 2002, with $376,000 of the decrease attributable to a decline in net unbilled receivables and $97,000 attributable to net billed receivables. Net receivables at December 31, 2002 had increased by $2.5 million since December 31, 2001, with $2.2 million and $300,000 related to net billed receivables and net unbilled receivables, respectively. The increase was primarily a result of increased product sales and billings related to customer service agreements, which also result in equal increases in unearned services revenue.

        NOMOS' customers are hospitals and free-standing cancer clinics, many of which typically pay invoices beyond normal terms. NOMOS management typically considers customer invoices past due, if they are not paid 60 days after the invoice date. Of NOMOS' current receivables, approximately 21%, 15% and 31% of the total were more than 60 days past due as of December 31, 2001, December 31, 2002 and December 31, 2003, respectively. The increase in past due accounts receivable at December 31, 2003 as a percentage of total receivables is primarily attributable to certain customers

95



experiencing delays in securing lease financing, as a result of one of the major providers of medical equipment financing suffering financial difficulties and eventually declaring bankruptcy, which in turn has caused the remaining competitors to have increased deal flow as compared to their capacity. NOMOS' sales are not contingent upon the customers obtaining financing. However, in the fourth quarter of 2003 one customer was unable to secure adequate financing to cover its purchase commitment and another customer would not pay for its contractual obligation. As a result, NOMOS wrote off net receivables in the amount of $215,000. NOMOS maintains an allowance for doubtful accounts that it believes is adequate to cover potential credit losses. NOMOS has experienced an increase in orders received at or near the end of its quarter and some slow down in collections due to payment practices followed by the hospital industry. Despite the slowdown in collections, NOMOS is not aware of any material collectibility or billing issues with its customers.

        Net cash used in investing activities was approximately $1.3 million, $516,000 and $699,000, for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively. Investments in 1999 relate to the purchase of ROCS and a prepayment we were required to make in connection with the aborted acquisition of Med-Tec, which required us to issue a prepayment, the refund of which became the subject of a lawsuit that we initiated. This lawsuit was settled in 2003 and as part of the settlement agreement we received a cash payment of $1.25 million which was then recorded in other income. Investments since 1999 related to normal capital expenditures. The significant increase in 2003 as compared to 2002 is attributable to capital expenditures, primarily leasehold improvements and furniture and fixtures, relate to our move to our new facility in January 2003.

        Net cash provided by financing activities was approximately $98,000, $90,000, and $5.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively. These financing activities consisted of proceeds from stock issuances. There were no issuances of short or long-term debt in 2003, 2002 or 2001.

Contractual Obligations

        NOMOS has contractual financial obligations consisting primarily of non-cancelable operating leases. The composition and nature of these obligations and commitments have not changed materially since December 31, 2003.

        The following table summarizes significant contractual obligations of NOMOS as of December 31, 2003:

 
   
  Payments Due by Period
Contractual
Obligations

  Total
  Less Than
1 Year

  1-3
Years

  4-5
Years

  After 5
Years

Operating Leases   $ 4,942,324   $ 771,219   $ 987,316   $ 1,005,101   $ 2,178,688
Royalty Payments   $ 2,475,000   $ 295,000   $ 830,000   $ 830,000   $ 520,000
   
 
 
 
 
Total   $ 7,417,324   $ 1,066,219   $ 1,817,316   $ 1,835,101   $ 2,698,688
   
 
 
 
 

Quantitative and Qualitative Discussion of Market Risk

        Although we transact our business in U.S. dollars, future fluctuations in the value of the U.S. dollar may affect the price competitiveness of our products, particularly if we accelerate sales internationally. However, we do not believe that we currently have any significant direct foreign currency exchange rate risk and have not hedged exposures denominated in foreign currencies or any other derivative financial instruments.

        The primary objective of our investment activities is to preserve principal while at the same time maximizing the income we receive from our invested cash without significantly increasing risk of loss. As of December 31, 2003, our cash and cash equivalents consisted primarily of money market funds maintained at one major U.S. financial institution. The recorded carrying amounts of cash and cash

96



equivalents approximate fair value due to their short-term maturities. We do not believe that an increase in market rates would have any significant negative impact on the realized value of our investments.

        NOMOS believes that cash flow from operations and cash balances will be sufficient to meet its commitments in 2004.

Inflation

        The impact of inflation on our business has not been material for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

        FASB Statement No. 146, Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities, addresses financial accounting and reporting for costs associated with exit or disposal activities and nullifies EITF Issue No. 94-3. The principal difference between FASB 146 and Issue 94-3 relates to FASB 146's requirements for recognition of a liability for a cost associated with an exit or disposal activity. FASB 146 requires that the cost associated with an exit or disposal activity be recognized when the liability is incurred. In addition, FASB stated that an entity's commitment to a plan, by itself, does not create an obligation that meets the definition of a liability. Therefore, this Statement eliminates the definition and requirements for recognition of exit costs in Issue 94-3. This Statement also establishes that fair value is the objective for initial measurement of the liability. FASB 146 became effective for NOMOS on January 1, 2003 and may impact certain restructuring activities from that date forward.

        FASB Statement No. 148, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation-Transition and Disclosure, amends FASB Statement No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, to provide alternative methods of transition for an entity that voluntarily changes to the fair value-based method of accounting for stock-based compensation. It also amends the disclosure provision of that Statement to require prominent disclosure abut the effects on reported net income of an entity's accounting policy decisions with respect to stock-based compensation. Finally, the Statement amends APB Opinion No. 28, Interim Financial Reporting, to require disclosure about those effects in interim financial information. NOMOS has adopted the disclosure requirements of FASB No. 148. The provisions of the FASB Statement became effective in 2002.

        In January 2003, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 46, Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, to expand upon and strengthen existing accounting guidance that addresses when a company should include in its financial statements the assets, liabilities and activities of variable interest entities, including special-purpose entities or off-balance sheet structures. The consolidation requirements of FIN No. 46 apply immediately to variable interest entities created after January 31, 2003. The consolidation requirements apply to older entities (formed or relationships established prior to January 31, 2003) in the first fiscal year or interim period ending after March 15, 2004. Certain of the disclosure requirements apply in all financial statements issued after January 31, 2003, regardless of when the variable interest entity was established. NOMOS believes the impact of FIN No. 46 on its financial position and results of operations will not be material, but NOMOS will continue to evaluate the impact of FIN No. 46.

        In May 2003, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 150, Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of both Liabilities and Equity. This statement affects an issuer's accounting for three types of freestanding financial statements: mandatorily redeemable shares, put and forward purchase contracts that require the issuer to buy back some of its shares in exchange for cash or other assets and certain obligations that can be settled in shares. This statement is effective for all financial instruments entered into or modified after May 31, 2003 and otherwise effective for all public companies at the beginning of the first interim period beginning after June 15, 2003. As a result of the characteristics of NOMOS' preferred stock, NOMOS' management believes the impact of adopting FASB No. 150 will not be material to NOMOS' financial statements.

97



Stockholder Matters

        The capital stock of NOMOS is not publicly traded, and no market value information on its capital stock is available. NOMOS has never declared or paid cash dividends on its capital stock and does not intend paying cash dividends in the foreseeable future. The merger agreement prohibits NOMOS from declaring or paying a dividend on its capital stock prior to the closing of the merger.

        As of the close of business on March 10, 2004, there were:

Beneficial Ownership of Capital Stock of NOMOS

        The following table sets forth information as of March 10, 2004 with respect to the beneficial ownership of NOMOS' (i) common stock, (ii) series A preferred stock, (iii) series B preferred stock and (iv) series C preferred stock by:

        The table is based on: 3,632,777 outstanding shares of common stock; 374,748 outstanding shares of series A preferred stock; 1,861,908 outstanding shares of series B preferred stock; and 1,336,152 outstanding shares of series C preferred stock, in each case as of March 10. As of March 10, 2004, each share of series B preferred stock and series C preferred stock was convertible into one share of common stock, and each share of series A preferred stock was convertible into approximately 1.3605 shares of common stock.

        Unless otherwise indicated in the footnotes to the table, each person named has sole voting power and sole investment power with respect to the shares included in the table. Shares of NOMOS common stock subject to options or warrants, which are currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of March 10, 2004, are deemed outstanding for computing the percentages of the person holding such options or warrants but are not deemed outstanding for computing the percentages of any other person. If the merger is consummated, all outstanding unvested options to purchase NOMOS common stock held by current directors and employees will immediately vest.

98



        Unless otherwise indicated, the address of each of the individuals listed in the table is c/o NOMOS Corporation, 200 West Kensinger Drive, Suite 100, Cranberry Township, PA 16066.

Name of Beneficial Owner

  Number of Shares
Beneficially Owned(1)

  Number of Shares
Underlying Options
and Warrants
Beneficially Owned(11)

  Percentage of Shares Beneficially Owned(20)
 
John W. Manzetti   367,997   367,997 (12) 4.77 %
John A. Friede   3,238,213 (2) 143,824 (13) 43.27 %
William W. Wells   240,220   240,220 (14) 3.17 %
David J. Haffner   37,174   37,174 (15) *  
Joseph M. Argyros   71,015   71,015 (16) *  
Frederick L. Marroni   37,174   37,174 (17) *  
Francis X. Dobscha   19,446   19,446 (18) *  
John L. Cassis(3)   1,036,127 (4)   14.11 %
Paul A. Brooke   50,761 (5)   *  
Andrew A. Giordano   70,050 (6) 59,898 (19) *  
Preston Tsao   56,177 (7) 55,837 (19) *  
Zesiger Capital Group, LLC(8)   605,355 (9)   8.25 %
Funds affiliated with Sanders Morris Harris
James C. Gale
Ben T. Morris
  710,660 (10)   9.68 %
All executive officers and Directors as a group (11 persons)   5,390,542   1,198,773   62.39 %

*
Less than 1%.

(1)
The shares listed in this column include all common stock, series A preferred stock, series B preferred stock and series C preferred stock beneficially owned by such person, as more fully described in the footnotes below, as well as the shares listed in the next column opposite such person's name. The amounts set forth in this column assume the conversion of all shares of series A preferred stock, series B preferred stock, series C preferred stock and stock options into shares of NOMOS common stock.

(2)
This number represents 1,558,797 shares of NOMOS common stock, 40,101 shares of NOMOS series A preferred stock, 1,481,035 shares of NOMOS series B preferred stock and 143,824 shares of NOMOS common stock underlying stock options.

(3)
These shares are owned by one or more of Cross Atlantic Partners, Inc., Cross Atlantic Partners I, K/S, Cross Atlantic Partners II, Cross Atlantic Partners III, Cross Atlantic Partners IV, K/S and Nordea Bank of Danmark A/S. Mr. Cassis has voting and investment control of the shares held by these entities. Mr. Cassis disclaims beneficial ownership of these shares except to the extent of his pecuniary interest therein.

(4)
This number represents 368,019 shares of NOMOS common stock, 177,665 shares of NOMOS series A preferred stock and 426,395 shares of NOMOS series C preferred stock.

(5)
This number represents 50,761 shares of NOMOS common stock.

(6)
This number represents 10,152 shares of NOMOS common stock and 59,898 shares of NOMOS common stock underlying options.

(7)
This number represents 340 shares of NOMOS common stock and 55,837 shares of NOMOS common stock underlying options.

(8)
These shares are owned by clients of Zesiger Capital Group, LLC, an investment advisor registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Investment Advisors Act of 1940, as amended. Zesiger Capital Group has voting and investment control over these shares

99


(9)
This number represents 398,173 shares of NOMOS common stock and 152,284 shares of NOMOS series A preferred stock.

(10)
This number represents 111,421 shares of series C preferred stock held by Corporate Opportunities Fund, L.P. and 599,239 shares of series C preferred stock held by Corporate Opportunities Fund (Institutional), L.P. (together, the "COF Funds"). SMM Corporate Management, LLC ("SMM") is the general partner of each of the COF Funds and Sanders Morris Harris, Inc. ("SMH") is the controlling member of SMM. SMH is a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Sanders Morris Harris Group ("SMHG"). Each of SMH, SMHG, Ben T. Morris (the chief executive officer of SMH) and James C. Gale, the chief investment officer of each of the COF Funds, may be deemed to beneficially own the shares held by the COF Funds. SMH Nomos LLC, whose members include certain SMH customers, holds an additional 142,132 shares of series C preferred stock. Bruce McMaken, a senior vice-president and managing director of SMH, is the sole manager of SMH Nomos LLC and may be deemed to beneficially own these 142,132 shares. Each of SMH, SMHG, Mr. Gale and Mr. Morris disclaims beneficial ownership of these shares.

(11)
The amounts listed in this column represent the number of shares of common stock underlying options or warrants that were exercisable as of, or within 60 days of, March 10, 2004.

(12)
304,569 of these shares underlie stock options that are exercisable at $0.99 per share, 50,761 of these shares underlie stock options that are exercisable at $3.94 per share and 12,667 of these shares underlie stock options that are exercisable at $1.00 per share. Mr. Manzetti also holds options to acquire an additional (i) 25,381 shares (at $3.94 per share) and (ii) 25,333 shares (at $1.00 per share), which options are currently unvested, but which will automatically vest upon consummation of the merger.

(13)
42,301 of these shares underlie stock options that are exercisable at $3.94 per share and 101,523 of these shares underlie stock options that are exercisable at $19.70 per share. Mr. Friede also holds options to acquire an additional 21,151 shares (at $3.94 per share), which options are currently unvested, but which will automatically vest upon consummation of the merger.

(14)
203,046 of these shares underlie stock options that are exercisable at $0.99 per share, 33,841 of these shares underlie stock options that are exercisable at $3.94 per share and 3,333 of these shares underlie stock options that are exercisable at $1.00 per share. Mr. Wells also holds options to acquire an additional (i) 16,920 shares (at $3.94 per share) and (ii) 6,667 shares (at $1.00 per share), which options are currently unvested, but which will automatically vest upon consummation of the merger.

(15)
33,841 of these shares underlie stock options that are exercisable at $3.94 per share and 3,333 of these shares underlie stock options that are exercisable at $1.00 per share. Mr. Haffner also holds options to acquire (i) 6,667 shares (at $1.00 per share) and (ii) 16,920 shares (at $3.94 per share) which options are currently unvested, but which will automatically vest upon consummation of the merger.

(16)
50,761 of these shares underlie stock options that are exercisable at $0.99 per share, 16,920 of these shares underlie stock options that are exercisable at $3.94 per share and 3,333 of these shares underlie stock options that are exercisable at $1.00 per share. Mr. Argyros also holds options to acquire an additional (i) 8,460 shares (at $3.94 per share) and (ii) 6,667 shares (at $1.00 per share), which options are currently unvested, but which will automatically vest upon consummation of the merger.

(17)
33,841 of these shares underlie stock options that are exercisable at $0.99 per share and 3,333 of these shares underlie stock options that are exercisable at $1.00 per share. Mr. Marroni also holds options to acquire an additional (i) 16,920 shares (at $0.99 per share) and (ii) 6,667 shares (at

100


(18)
6,768 of these shares underlie stock options that are exercisable at $0.99 per share, 833 of these shares underlie stock options that are exercisable at $1.00 per share and 11,844 of these shares underlie stock options that are exercisable at $3.94 per share. Mr. Dobscha also holds options to acquire an additional (i) 846 shares (at $0.99 per share), (ii) 5,922 shares (at $3.94 per share) and (iii) 1,667 shares (at $1.00 per share), which options are currently unvested, but which will automatically vest upon consummation of the merger.

(19)
These shares underlie stock options that are exercisable at $0.99 per share.

(20)
The percentages listed in this column are based on an as-converted-to-common stock basis, assuming the conversion of each share of series B preferred stock and series C preferred stock into one share of common stock, and the conversion of each share of series A preferred stock into 1.3605 shares of common stock.

Management of NOMOS and the Executive Officers and Directors of NOMOS Joining NASI

Directors and Executive Officers of NOMOS

        Set forth below are the names of NOMOS' current directors and executive officers who are expected to continue to serve as either directors or executive officers of NASI after the merger, their ages, their offices in NOMOS, if any, their principal occupations or employment for the past five years, the length of their tenure as directors and executive officers and the names of other public companies in which they hold directorships.

Name

  Age
  Position(s)
John A. Friede   65   Chairman of the Board and Director
John W. Manzetti   56   President, Chief Executive Officer and Director

        John A. Friede co-founded NOMOS with Dr. Mark Carol in 1979 and has served as chairman of the board of directors and a director since NOMOS' inception. Mr. Friede is also an employee of NOMOS. From November 1999 to December 2000, Mr. Friede served as NOMOS' president, and from November 1999 to October 2001, he also served as NOMOS' chief executive officer. Prior to joining NOMOS, Mr. Friede managed, and continues to manage, his own private investment portfolio in medical technology and other venture capital fields. Mr. Friede holds a B.A. in History from Dartmouth College and an M.B.A. from the Harvard University Graduate School of Business Administration. Mr. Friede is currently the chairman of the board of directors of Milkhaus Laboratory, Inc., a privately held company.

        John W. Manzetti has served as NOMOS' chief executive officer since October 2001 and as president since December 2000. From December 2000 to October 2001, Mr. Manzetti also served as NOMOS' chief operating officer. From the time he joined NOMOS in May 1999 until December 2000, Mr. Manzetti served as NOMOS executive vice president and chief financial officer. He has been a member of NOMOS' board of directors since December 2000. Prior to joining NOMOS, from 1988 to 1999, Mr. Manzetti served as executive vice president and chief financial officer at Carnegie Group, Inc., a public company that was acquired by Logica PLC in November 1998. Mr. Manzetti also was a director, secretary and treasurer of Carnegie Group. Mr. Manzetti holds a B.S.B.A. from Geneva College and an M.B.A. from the University of Akron.

Summary Compensation Table

        The following table sets forth all compensation earned, including salary, bonuses, stock options and other compensation, during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003 by John W. Manzetti, NOMOS' president and chief executive officer. This information is being provided with respect to Mr. Manzetti

101



because he is both (1) one of NOMOS' executive officers and (2) expected to serve as an executive officer and director of NASI.

 
   
   
   
  Long-Term Compensation
   
 
 
  Annual Compensation
   
   
 
Name and Principal Position

  Restricted
Stock Awards

  Securities Underlying Options/SARS
  All Other Compensation
 
  Salary
  Bonus
 
John W. Manzetti
President and Chief Executive Officer(1)
  $ 300,000   $ 75,000       $ 5,866 (1)

(1)
Of this amount, $360 represents insurance premiums we paid under a life insurance policy for the benefit of Mr. Manzetti, which is provided to all our employees. The remaining $5,506 represents our contribution to the NOMOS 401(k) plan on behalf of Mr. Manzetti.

Option Grants in Last Fiscal Year

        The following table summarizes the stock options granted to the NOMOS executive officer named in the above summary compensation table during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003. The table includes the potential realizable value over the 10-year term of the options, based on assumed rates of stock appreciation of 5% and 10%, compounded annually. Potential realizable value is based upon the fair market value of our common stock on the grant date of the options as determined by our board of directors.

 
  Individual Grants
   
   
   
   
 
   
  Percent of Total Options Granted to Employees in Fiscal Year 2003
   
   
  Potential Realizable Value at Assumed Annual Rates of Stock Price Appreciation
 
  Number of Securities Underlying Options Granted
   
   
Name

  Exercise Price Per Share
  Expiration Date
  5% ($)
  10% ($)
John W. Manzetti   38,000   22.16 % $ 1.00   12/31/12   23,898   60,562

Aggregate Option Exercises in Last Fiscal Year and Option Values at December 31, 2003

        The following table provides information concerning exercises of options by each of NOMOS' executive officers named in the above summary compensation table in 2003 and the number and value of unexercised options held by such executive officers at December 31, 2003.

 
   
   
  Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options at December 31, 2003
   
   
 
   
   
  Value of Unexercised in-the-Money Options at December 31, 2003(1)
Name

  Shares Acquired on Exercise
  Value Realized
  Exercisable
  Unexercisable
  Exercisable
  Unexercisable
John W. Manzetti       355,330 (2) 63,381 (3) $ 1,731,472   $ 260,031

(1)
The value of unexercised in-the-money options held at December 31, 2003 represents the total gain which an option holder would realize if he or she exercised all of the in-the-money options held at December 31, 2003, and is determined by multiplying the number of shares of common stock underlying the options by the difference between an assumed fair market value of $6.28 per share and the per share option exercise price. The assumed fair market value is based on (i) $7.05, the closing sales price of NASI common stock on the Nasdaq National Market on October 24, 2003, the last trading day before the signing and announcement of the merger agreement, multiplied by (ii) 0.891, the exchange ratio at which each share of outstanding NOMOS common stock will be converted into NASI common stock in the merger.

102


(2)
304,569 of these options are exercisable at $0.99 per share. The remaining 50,761 options are exercisable at $3.94 per share.

(3)
38,000 of these options (of which 12,667 vested on January 1, 2004) are exercisable at $1.00 per share. The remaining 25,381 options are exercisable at $3.94 per share. All of these options will automatically vest upon consummation of the merger.

Director Compensation

        NOMOS pays each of its non-employee board members an annual retainer of $5,000, as well as $2,500 for each meeting attended in person and $1,000 for each meeting attended by phone. NOMOS also reimburses its board members for customary travel and similar expenses. NOMOS has granted options to all of its board members, including its non-employee directors. All of NOMOS' directors are eligible to participate in NOMOS' stock option plan. Any unvested stock options of current directors will immediately vest and become exercisable upon the consummation of the merger.

Employment Contracts, Termination of Employment and Change-In-Control Arrangements

        Below is a summary of NOMOS' employment agreements with persons who are both (1) an executive officer or director of NOMOS and (2) expected to serve as an executive officer or director of NASI following the merger.

        NOMOS is party to a letter agreement dated February 11, 2002 with John A. Friede, NOMOS' chairman of the board of directors and largest stockholder, which agreement provides that if NOMOS terminates his employment without cause (as defined in the letter agreement), he will receive continued payment of his base salary, which is currently $180,000 per year, and health benefits for twelve months after the termination date. Except for this obligation, Mr. Friede's employment can be terminated by NOMOS at any time. Mr. Friede's employment agreement does not specifically describe his duties. NOMOS classifies Mr. Friede as a full time employee. His principal duties are to provide advisory services, such as strategic planning with respect to new technology, on an as-needed basis under the direction of our chief executive officer.

        NOMOS is party to a letter agreement dated June 18, 2003 with John W. Manzetti, its president and chief executive officer. This agreement provides that if Mr. Manzetti's employment is terminated other than (1) because of death or disability, (2) by NOMOS for cause (as defined in the letter agreement), or (3) by Mr. Manzetti without good reason (as defined in the letter agreement), he will receive a severance payment equal to twice his annual base salary, which is currently $300,000 per year, along with twenty four months of health care benefits at NOMOS' expense. Except for this obligation, Mr. Manzetti's employment can be terminated by NOMOS at any time. In addition, this agreement provides that in the event of a change in control of NOMOS (which would include the proposed merger with NASI) all stock options held by Mr. Manzetti would automatically become 100% vested. It is contemplated that Mr. Manzetti and NASI will enter into a new employment agreement on or prior to the consummation of the merger, which will supersede his existing agreement with NOMOS. The terms of this employment agreement, as currently contemplated, are described in "Interests of Certain Persons in the Merger".

Compensation Committee Interlocks

        John A. Friede, NOMOS' chairman of the board of directors and its largest stockholder, and John W. Manzetti, NOMOS' president and chief executive officer, are the only NOMOS directors and executive officers who are expected to serve as directors or executive officers of NASI. Neither Mr. Friede nor Mr. Manzetti serves as a member of the board of directors or compensation committee of any entity that has one or more executive officers serving as a member of either NOMOS' board of directors or compensation committee or NASI's board of directors or compensation and organization committee.

103



Certain Relationships and Related Transactions of NOMOS

        In February 2001, one of NOMOS' stockholders entered into an agreement with John A. Friede which granted that stockholder the right to cause Mr. Friede to purchase certain shares owned by that stockholder at various intervals at predetermined values. The excess of the purchase price over the related estimated fair value of the stock has been treated as an expense to NOMOS. In connection with his purchase of approximately 30,456 of such shares in May 2003, and upon approval of NOMOS' board of directors, NOMOS loaned to Mr. Friede certain funds, which loan was evidenced by a promissory note in the principal amount of $287,160. This loan is unsecured and accrues interest at a base rate plus 0.5%, with the base rate equal to the greater of (i) the Federal funds rate (as determined by the National City Bank of Pennsylvania) plus 0.5%, or (ii) the prime rate (as announced by the National City Bank of Pennsylvania). NOMOS intends to forgive this loan immediately prior to the consummation of the merger.

104



OPINIONS OF FINANCIAL ADVISORS

Opinion of NASI's Financial Advisor—Bear, Stearns & Co. Inc.

        At a meeting of NASI's board of directors held on October 25, 2003, at which the NASI board of directors considered and approved the merger agreement and the merger, Bear Stearns rendered its oral opinion (which was subsequently confirmed in a written opinion, dated as of October 25, 2003) that, as of such date and based upon and subject to the matters reviewed with NASI's board of directors and the assumptions and limitations contained in the Bear Stearns opinion, the aggregate amount of shares to be issued and cash to be paid to holders of capital stock of NOMOS (the "Merger Consideration") is fair to NASI from a financial point of view. The opinion of Bear Stearns did not address the fairness of the merger consideration to NASI stockholders.

        The full text of the Bear Stearns opinion is attached hereto as Annex H. The description of the Bear Stearns opinion set forth herein is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of the Bear Stearns opinion set forth in Annex H. NASI stockholders are urged to read the Bear Stearns opinion in its entirety for a description of the procedures followed, assumptions made, matters considered and qualifications and limitations on the review undertaken by Bear Stearns in connection therewith. The Bear Stearns opinion is subject to the assumptions and conditions contained therein and is necessarily based on economic, market and other conditions and the information made available to Bear Stearns, including information with respect to the number and related terms of options, warrants, shares of preferred stock and shares of common stock currently outstanding for both NASI and NOMOS, as of the date of the Bear Stearns opinion. Bear Stearns assumes no responsibility for updating or revising its opinion based on circumstances or events occurring after the date of the Bear Stearns opinion. The Bear Stearns opinion is intended for the benefit and use of the board of directors of NASI in connection with its consideration of the merger and does not constitute a recommendation to the board of directors of NASI or any holders of NASI common stock as to how to vote in connection with the merger. The Bear Stearns opinion did not address NASI's underlying decision to pursue the merger, the relative merits of the merger as compared to any alternative business strategies that might have existed for NASI or the effects of any other transaction in which NASI might have engaged.

        In the course of performing their review and analyses for rendering their opinion, Bear Stearns:

105



        Bear Stearns relied upon and assumed, without independent verification, the accuracy and completeness of the financial and other information provided by NASI and NOMOS, including, without limitation, the NASI Projections, the Adjusted NOMOS Projections and the Potential Synergies. With respect to the NASI Projections and the Adjusted NOMOS Projections, Bear Stearns relied on representations that they have been reasonably prepared on bases reflecting the best currently available estimates and judgments of the senior management of NASI as to the expected future performance of NASI and NOMOS. With respect to the Potential Synergies, Bear Stearns relied on representations of NASI that they have been reasonably prepared based on the best currently available estimates and judgments of the senior management of NASI as to the benefits expected to result from the merger. Bear Stearns did not assume any responsibility for the independent verification of any such information or of the NASI Projections, the Adjusted NOMOS Projections and the Potential Synergies provided to Bear Stearns, and Bear Stearns further relied upon the assurances of the senior management of NASI that they are unaware of any facts that would make such information, the NASI Projections, the Adjusted NOMOS Projections and the Potential Synergies provided to Bear Stearns incomplete or misleading. In addition, Bear Stearns has not assumed any responsibility for the independent verification of any such information or of the NOMOS Projections provided to Bear Stearns, and Bear Stearns further relied upon the assurances of the senior management of NOMOS that they were unaware of any facts that would make the information or the NOMOS Projections provided to Bear Stearns incomplete or misleading.

        In arriving at their opinion, Bear Stearns did not perform or obtain any independent appraisal of the assets or liabilities (contingent or otherwise) of NASI or NOMOS, nor was Bear Stearns furnished with any such appraisals. Bear Stearns assumed that the merger will qualify as a tax-free

106



"reorganization" within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the Internal Revenue Code. Bear Stearns also assumed that the merger would be consummated in a timely manner and in accordance with the terms of the merger agreement without any limitations, restrictions, conditions, amendments or modifications, regulatory or otherwise, that collectively would have a material effect on NASI or NOMOS.

        Bear Stearns did not express any opinion as to the price or range of prices at which the NASI common stock may trade subsequent to the announcement of the merger or as to the price or range of prices at which the NASI common stock may trade subsequent to the consummation of the merger.

        Bear Stearns acted as financial advisor to NASI in connection with the merger, and will receive a customary fee for such services, a substantial portion of which is contingent on successful consummation of the merger. In the ordinary course of business, Bear Stearns and its affiliates may actively trade the equity of NASI for their own account and for the account of their customers and, accordingly, may at any time hold a long or short position in such securities.

Summary of Financial Analyses

        The following is a summary of the material financial analyses performed by Bear Stearns in connection with the rendering of their fairness opinion to the NASI board of directors. To the extent that the financial analyses set forth below make assumptions about NASI's business without the Apomate product program, such assumptions have been made because there is no assurance that such products will achieve market acceptance or compete successfully against other similar diagnostic products.

        Some of the financial analyses summarized below include information presented in tabular format. In order to understand fully Bear Stearns' financial analyses, the tables must be read together with the text of the summary. The tables alone are not a complete description of the financial analyses. Considering the tables alone could create a misleading or incomplete view of Bear Stearns' financial analyses.

        Valuation of Estimated Cost Savings.    Bear Stearns performed a discounted cash flow analysis of the estimated cost savings expected to result from the merger. In valuing the estimated cost savings, Bear Stearns used illustrative discount rates ranging from 13% to 15%, illustrative perpetual growth rates of 2% to 4% and assumed realization of 100%, 75% and 50% of estimated cost savings expected to result in the merger.

107



        The following table illustrates the implied value of the estimated cost savings expected to result from the merger based on the Bear Stearns analyses:

Valuation of Estimated Cost Savings

 
  Growth Rates
 
  Discount
Rate

  2.0%
  3.0%
  4.0%
 
  ($ in millions)

100% of Estimated Cost Savings Achieved   13.0
14.0
15.0
%

$

8.9
8.1
7.4
  $

9.7
8.7
7.9
  $

10.7
9.6
8.6

75% of Estimated Cost Savings Achieved

 

13.0
14.0
15.0

%


$


6.7
6.0
5.5

 

$


7.3
6.6
5.9

 

$


8.1
7.2
6.4

50% of Estimated Cost Savings Achieved

 

13.0
14.0
15.0

%


$


4.4
4.0
3.7

 

$


4.9
4.4
4.0

 

$


5.4
4.8
4.3

        Discounted Cash Flow Analysis.    Based on cash flow projections for NASI and NOMOS as prepared by NASI and the estimated cost savings expected to result in the merger prepared by the management of NASI, Bear Stearns performed a discounted cash flow analysis to assist the NASI board of directors in valuing NASI, NOMOS and the pro forma combined company.

        Bear Stearns performed discounted cash flow analysis assuming:

Assumed Discount Rates for Apomate™ Product Program Positive Cash Flows

 
  Development
Stage

  Growth
Stage

  Maturity/
Decline Stage

 
Low   27.5 % 16.0 % 13.0 %
Mid   30.0   18.0   14.0  
High   32.5   20.0   15.0  

108


        Discounted cash flow valuations were calculated for NASI excluding the Apomate™ product program, NASI on a stand-alone basis, NOMOS on a stand-alone basis both including and excluding estimated cost savings and the pro forma combined company including and excluding estimated cost savings.

        Using this analysis, Bear Stearns derived a range of implied equity values per share for NASI, NOMOS and the pro forma combined company as follows:

Implied per Share Equity Values

 
  Range
 
  Low
   
  High
NASI                
  Business excluding the Apomate™ product program   $ 7.84   -   $ 9.09
  Consolidated stand-alone     8.08   -     11.27

NOMOS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
  Excluding estimated cost savings   $ 6.82   -   $ 10.29
  With 100% of estimated cost savings achieved     7.78   -     11.69

Combined Company

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
  Excluding estimated cost savings   $ 8.01   -   $ 11.48
  With 100% of estimated cost savings achieved     8.42   -     12.06

        Comparable Public Companies Analysis.    Bear Stearns performed a comparable public companies analysis to assist the NASI board of directors in valuing NOMOS based on various financial multiples of selected public companies in the medical technology industry which Bear Stearns believes are comparable. In performing this analysis, Bear Stearns reviewed certain financial information relating to NOMOS and compared such information to the corresponding financial information of other publicly traded medical technology companies that operate comparable businesses to NOMOS and which Bear Stearns deemed to be generally comparable to NOMOS.

        Bear Stearns compared the projected financial performance and the resulting multiples as of October 23, 2003 of NASI and the resulting multiples of NOMOS implied by the Merger Consideration to eight publicly traded medical technology companies which it deemed generally comparable to NOMOS. Such comparable companies consisted of:



        Using publicly available information and market data as of October 23, 2003 for NASI and the comparable companies, and in the case of NASI and NOMOS information based on NASI

109



management estimates for both NASI and NOMOS, Bear Stearns calculated the following harmonic mean multiples for the above public comparable companies:

Comparable Company Multiples

 
  Calendar Year
 
 
  2003E
  2004E
 
Comparable Company Harmonic Mean multiples:          
  Enterprise Value/Revenues   2.19 x 1.94 x
  Enterprise Value/EBITDA   18.1 x 12.3 x
  Equity Value/Net Income   37.6 x 24.9 x
NASI at Market Harmonic Mean multiples:          
  Enterprise Value/Revenues   1.71 x 1.25 x
  Enterprise Value/EBITDA   NA   NA  
  Equity Value/Net Income   NA   NA  
NOMOS at Deal Harmonic Mean multiples:          
  Enterprise Value/Revenues   1.71 x 1.47 x
  Enterprise Value/EBITDA   22.6 x 19.8 x
  Equity Value/Net Income   50.7 x 46.5 x

        "Harmonic mean" is calculated by using the reciprocals of the multiples and gives equal weight to equal dollar investments in the securities whose ratios are being averaged. Bear Stearns utilizes the harmonic mean in averaging ratios in which price is the numerator. "Equity Value" is defined as equity value based on the fully diluted shares outstanding and the closing share price as of October 23, 2003. "Enterprise Value" is calculated as the sum of the value of the common equity on a fully diluted basis and the value of net debt, any minority interest and preferred stock. "NASI at Market" is defined as NASI's enterprise value based on the closing share price of the NASI common stock as of October 23, 2002. "NOMOS at Deal" is defined as NOMOS' equity value and enterprise value implied by the amount of the Merger Consideration.

        Bear Stearns did not consider the EBITDA and Net Income multiples to be as relevant due to the limited amount of EBITDA and Net Income generated by NOMOS in these periods.

        Bear Stearns noted that none of the comparable companies were identical to NOMOS and that, accordingly, any analysis of the comparable companies involved complex considerations and judgments concerning differences in industry and individual company dynamics, financial and operating characteristics and various other factors that would necessarily affect the transactions multiples in the merger as compared to the multiples for the comparable companies.

110


        Selected Precedent Medical Technology Transactions Analysis.    Bear Stearns performed selected precedent transactions analyses to assist the NASI board of directors in valuing the fairness of the Merger Consideration based on transaction values expressed as multiples of various financial measures in selected medical technology transactions. Using publicly available information, Bear Stearns reviewed and analyzed certain financial and operating data relating to the following selected transactions involving companies in the medical technology industry that operate comparable businesses to NOMOS:

Precedent Transactions

Target

  Acquiror
  Date Announced
Zmed, Inc.   Varian Medical Systems, Inc.   10/13/03
Amersham, Plc   GE Medical Systems   10/08/03
MDS Nordion's Oncology Software Solutions Business   Nucletron BV   02/11/03
Imatron Inc.   GE Medical Systems   09/24/01
Marconi Medical   Philips Medical   07/04/01
Agilent's Healthcare Solutions Group   Philips Medical   11/17/00
ADAC Laboratories   Philips Medical   11/13/00
Acuson Corp.   Siemens Medical   09/27/00
Lunar Corp.   GE Medical Systems   06/02/00
OEC Medical Systems, Inc.   GE Medical Systems   08/09/99
ATL Ultrasound, Inc.   Philips Medical   07/29/98

        Bear Stearns calculated the following multiples for the selected precedent medical technology transactions in its analysis:

Precedent Transaction Multiples

 
  Low
  Harmonic
Mean

  Median
  High
  NOMOS at Deal
Enterprise Value as a multiple of:                    
LTM Revenue   0.67x   1.43x   1.50x   3.78x   1.93x
CY Revenue   1.20x   1.60x   1.54x   3.84x   1.71x
LTM EBITDA   6.3x   13.0x   14.8x   36.8x   41.9x
CY EBITDA   9.5x   12.8x   12.2x   17.5x   22.6x

        "LTM Revenue" is a company's revenue for the last twelve months prior to the announcement of the transaction. "CY Revenue" is a company's projected revenue for the calendar year of the date of announcement. "LTM EBITDA" is a company's EBITDA for the last twelve months prior to the announcement of the transaction. "CY EBITDA" is a company's projected EBITDA for the calendar year of the date of announcement.

        Bear Stearns did not consider EBITDA multiples to be as relevant due to the limited amount of EBITDA generated by NOMOS in the applicable measurement periods.

        Bear Stearns noted that none of the precedent transactions were identical to the acquisition of NOMOS by NASI and that, accordingly, any analysis of the precedent transactions necessarily involved complex considerations and judgments concerning differences in industry and individual company dynamics, stock market valuation parameters, financial and operating characteristics and various other factors that would necessarily affect the transactions multiples in the merger as compared to the multiples for the precedent transactions.

111



        Contribution Analysis.    Bear Stearns performed a contribution analysis to assist the NASI board of directors in valuing NOMOS on the relative contribution of each company to the combined pro forma entity. In performing the analyses, Bear Stearns used the NASI Projections, the Adjusted NOMOS Projections and public information. Bear Stearns calculated the relative contribution by both NASI and NOMOS to the combined entity with respect to the enterprise value and equity value at market for NASI (based on the closing share price of the NASI common stock as of October 23, 2003) and for NOMOS as implied by the Merger Consideration, and projected financial data including revenues, EBITDA and net income without estimated cost savings. Bear Stearns also calculated the relative contribution by both NASI and NOMOS to the combined entity with respect to the enterprise value and equity value at market for NASI (based on the closing share price of the NASI common stock as of October 23, 2003) and for NOMOS as implied by the Merger Consideration, and projected financial data including revenues, EBITDA, and net income without NASI's costs associated with the Apomate™ product program, and with and without estimated cost savings to the combined company.

        The following table illustrates the relative contribution to revenues, EBITDA and net income of both NASI and NOMOS without estimated cost savings to the combined company:

Relative Contribution Without Estimated Cost Savings

 
  % of Contribution
 
 
  NASI
  NOMOS
 
Equity Value at Deal   57.0 % 43.0 %
Enterprise Value at Deal   32.5   67.5  

2003E Revenues

 

35.2

%

64.8

%
2004E Revenues   36.0   64.0  
2005E Revenues   35.6   64.4  
2006E Revenues   35.0   65.0  
2007E Revenues   31.5   68.5  

2003E EBITDA

 

0.0

%

100.0

%
2004E EBITDA   0.0   100.0  
2005E EBITDA   0.0   100.0  
2006E EBITDA   0.0   100.0  
2007E EBITDA   0.0   100.0  

2004E Net Income

 

0.0

%

100.0

%
2005E Net Income   0.0   100.0  
2006E Net Income   0.0   100.0  
2007E Net Income   0.0   100.0  

        "Equity Value at Deal" is defined as equity value based on the fully diluted shares outstanding and the closing share price of NASI as of October 23, 2003, and for NOMOS as the implied equity value of NOMOS based on the Merger Consideration. "Enterprise Value at Deal" is calculated as the sum of the Equity Value at Deal and the value of net debt, any minority interest and preferred stock.

112



        The following table illustrates the relative contribution to revenues, EBITDA and net income of both NASI and NOMOS without the NASI costs associated with the Apomate™ product program, and without estimated cost savings to the combined company:

Relative Contribution Without Apomate™ Product Program Costs and Without Estimated Cost Savings

 
  % of Contribution
 
 
  NASI
  NOMOS
 
Equity Value at Deal   57.0 % 43.0 %
Enterprise Value at Deal   32.5   67.5  

2003E Revenues

 

35.2

%

64.8

%
2004E Revenues   36.0   64.0  
2005E Revenues   35.6   64.4  
2006E Revenues   35.0   65.0  
2007E Revenues   31.5   68.5  

2003E EBITDA

 

0.0

%

100.0

%
2004E EBITDA   40.6   59.4  
2005E EBITDA   48.0   52.0  
2006E EBITDA   46.3   53.7  
2007E EBITDA   39.3   60.7  

2004E Net Income

 

94.9

%

5.1

%
2005E Net Income   60.4   39.6  
2006E Net Income   51.8   48.2  
2007E Net Income   41.5   58.5  

        The following table illustrates the relative contribution to EBITDA and net income of both NASI and NOMOS without the NASI costs associated with the Apomate™ product program, and with estimated cost savings assuming realization of 50% in 2005 and 100% in 2006 of the estimated cost savings expected to result in the merger to the combined company:

Relative Contribution Without Apomate™ Product Program Costs and with Estimated Cost Savings

 
  EBITDA
  Net Income
 
 
  2004E
  2005E
  2006E
  2007E
  2004E
  2005E
  2006E
  2007E
 
% Contribution of NASI   40.6 % 43.3 % 40.7 % 35.6 % 94.9 % 52.4 % 44.2 % 36.8 %
% Contribution of NOMOS   59.4   46.8   47.3   55.0   5.1   34.3   41.3   52.1  
% Contribution of Estimated Cost Savings   0.0   9.9   12.1   9.4   0.0   13.3   14.6   11.1  
Total   100.0   100.0   100.0   100.0   100.0   100.0   100.0   100.0  

        Pro Forma Merger Analysis.    Bear Stearns performed a pro forma merger analysis to assist the NASI board of directors in analyzing the financial impact of the merger on NASI. Bear Stearns reviewed and analyzed certain pro forma financial impacts of the merger on NASI on a stand-alone basis and assuming costs for the Apomate™ product program were not incurred, and based on the following, among other items:

113


        The following table shows the projected per share accretion / (dilution) including the projected cost savings, and the projected per share accretion / (dilution) including the projected costs savings and excluding the costs for the Apomate™ product program to NASI's pro forma earnings.

NASI Accretion/(Dilution)

NASI EPS excluding Apomate™ product program   $ 0.00   $ 0.05   $ 0.14

"EPS" is defined as earnings per share.

Miscellaneous

        In connection with rendering their opinion, Bear Stearns performed a variety of financial analyses. The preparation of a fairness opinion involves various determinations as to the most appropriate and relevant methods of financial analysis and the application of these methods to the particular circumstances and, therefore, such an opinion is not readily susceptible to a partial analysis or summary description. Bear Stearns arrived at its ultimate opinion based on the results of all analyses undertaken by it and assessed as a whole and believes that the totality of the factors considered and analyses performed by Bear Stearns in connection with its opinion operated collectively to support its determination as to the fairness to NASI of the Merger Consideration. Accordingly, notwithstanding the analyses summarized above, Bear Stearns believes that its analyses must be considered as a whole and that selecting portions of the analyses and factors considered by them, without considering all such analyses and factors, or attempting to ascribe relative weights to some or all such analyses and factors, could create an incomplete view of the evaluation process underlying the Bear Stearns opinion.

        In performing their analyses, Bear Stearns considered industry performance, general business and economic conditions and other matters, many of which are beyond the control of NASI. The analyses performed by Bear Stearns are not necessarily indicative of actual values or actual future results, which may be significantly more or less favorable than suggested by such analyses. Bear Stearns did not assign any specific weight to any of the analyses described above and did not draw any specific conclusions from or with regard to any one method of analysis. With respect to the analysis of comparable companies and the analysis of selected precedent transactions summarized above, no public company utilized as a comparison is identical to NASI or NOMOS, and no transaction is identical to the merger. Accordingly, an analysis of publicly traded comparable companies and comparable business combinations is not mathematical; rather, it involves complex considerations and judgments concerning the differences in financial and operating characteristics of the companies and other factors that could affect the public trading values or announced merger transaction values, as the case may be, of NASI or NOMOS and the companies to which they were compared.

        The type and amount of consideration payable in the merger were determined through negotiations between NASI and NOMOS and were approved by the NASI board of directors. The decision to enter into the merger agreement was solely that of the NASI board of directors. The analyses do not purport to be appraisals or to reflect the prices at which any securities may trade at the present time or at any time in the future. In addition, the Bear Stearns opinion was just one of the many factors taken into consideration by NASI's board of directors. Consequently, Bear Stearns'

114



analysis should not be viewed as determinative of the decision of NASI's board of directors or NASI's management with respect to the fairness of the Merger Consideration.

        Bear Stearns is an internationally recognized investment banking firm and is continually engaged in the valuation of businesses and their securities in connection with mergers and acquisitions, negotiated underwritings, secondary distributions of listed and unlisted securities, private placements, leveraged buyouts and valuations for estate, corporate and other purposes.

        Bear Stearns was selected by the NASI board of directors to act as its financial advisor and render a fairness opinion because of its expertise and reputation in investment banking and mergers and acquisitions and its familiarity with the medical technology industry, NASI and NOMOS. NASI and Bear Stearns entered into a letter agreement, dated as of August 20, 2003, under which NASI has agreed to pay Bear Stearns a total fee of $1.15 million. Except for any portion of the fee previously paid by NASI, the total fee will become payable in full upon consummation of the merger between NASI and NOMOS. NASI also agreed to reimburse Bear Stearns for certain out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with the engagement. In addition, NASI agreed to indemnify Bear Stearns against certain liabilities, including liabilities under the federal securities law, relating to or arising out of its engagement.

Opinion of NOMOS' Financial Advisor—CIBC World Markets Corp.

        NOMOS engaged CIBC World Markets to act as its financial advisor in connection with the merger. In connection with this engagement, the NOMOS board of directors requested that CIBC World Markets evaluate the fairness, from a financial point of view, to the holders of NOMOS common stock of the common stock exchange ratio provided for in the merger. On October 24, 2003, at a meeting of the NOMOS board of directors held to evaluate the merger, CIBC World Markets rendered to the NOMOS board of directors an oral opinion, which was confirmed by delivery of a written opinion dated the same date, to the effect that, as of that date and based on and subject to the matters described in its opinion, the 0.891 common stock exchange ratio provided for in the merger was fair, from a financial point of view, to the holders of NOMOS common stock.

        The full text of CIBC World Markets' written opinion, dated October 24, 2003, which describes the assumptions made, procedures followed, matters considered and limitations on the review undertaken, is attached to this joint proxy statement/prospectus as Annex I. CIBC World Markets' opinion was provided to the NOMOS board of directors in connection with its evaluation of the common stock exchange ratio and relates only to the fairness, from a financial point of view, of the common stock exchange ratio to the holders of NOMOS common stock. The opinion does not address any other aspect of the merger and does not constitute a recommendation as to how any stockholder should vote or act with respect to any matters relating to the merger. The summary of CIBC World Markets' opinion described below is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of its opinion. Holders of NOMOS common stock are encouraged to read the opinion carefully in its entirety.

        In arriving at its opinion, CIBC World Markets:

115


        In rendering its opinion, CIBC World Markets relied on and assumed, without independent verification or investigation, the accuracy and completeness of all of the financial and other information provided to or discussed with it by NOMOS, NASI and their respective employees, representatives and affiliates. With respect to financial forecasts and estimates provided to or discussed with CIBC World Markets by the managements of NOMOS and NASI, CIBC World Markets assumed, at the direction of the managements of NOMOS and NASI, without independent verification or investigation, that the financial forecasts and estimates were reasonably prepared on bases reflecting the best available information, estimates and judgments of the managements of NOMOS and NASI as to the future financial condition and operating results of NOMOS and NASI. CIBC World Markets relied, at the direction of the managements of NOMOS and NASI, without independent verification or investigation, on the assessments of the managements of NOMOS and NASI as to the existing and future technology and product candidates of NOMOS and NASI and the risks associated with such technology and product candidates and the ability of NOMOS and NASI to retain key employees and customers. CIBC World Markets assumed, with NOMOS' consent, that the merger would be treated as a reorganization for federal income tax purposes. CIBC World Markets also assumed, with NOMOS' consent, that the merger would be consummated in accordance with its terms, without waiver, modification or amendment of any material term, condition or agreement and in compliance with all applicable laws and that, in the course of obtaining the necessary regulatory or third party approvals, consents and releases for the merger, no delay, limitation, restriction or condition would be imposed that would have an adverse effect on NOMOS, NASI or the merger. In addition, representatives of NOMOS advised CIBC World Markets, and CIBC World Markets therefore assumed, that the final terms of the merger agreement and related documents would not vary materially from the terms contained in the drafts of those documents reviewed by CIBC World Markets.

        CIBC World Markets did not make or obtain any independent evaluations or appraisals of the assets or liabilities, contingent or otherwise, of NOMOS or NASI. CIBC World Markets expressed no opinion as to NOMOS' or NASI's underlying valuation, future performance or long-term viability or any of their respective products or product candidates, the likelihood or timing of any approval by the FDA of Apomate, or the prices at which NASI common stock would trade at any time. CIBC World Markets expressed no view as to, and its opinion does not address, NOMOS' underlying business decision to effect the merger, and its opinion also does not address the relative merits of the merger as compared to any alternative business strategies that might exist for NOMOS or the effect of any other transaction in which NOMOS might engage. CIBC World Markets' opinion was necessarily based on the information available to CIBC World Markets and general economic, financial and stock market conditions and circumstances as they existed and could be evaluated by CIBC World Markets as of the date of its opinion. Although subsequent developments may affect its opinion, CIBC World Markets

116



does not have any obligation to update, revise or reaffirm its opinion. NOMOS imposed no other instructions or limitations on CIBC World Markets with respect to the investigations made or the procedures followed by it in rendering its opinion.

        This summary is not a complete description of CIBC World Markets' opinion or the financial analyses performed and factors considered by CIBC World Markets in connection with its opinion. The preparation of a financial opinion is a complex analytical process involving various determinations as to the most appropriate and relevant methods of financial analysis and the application of those methods to the particular circumstances and, therefore, a financial opinion is not readily susceptible to summary description. CIBC World Markets arrived at its ultimate opinion based on the results of all analyses undertaken by it and assessed as a whole and believes that the totality of the factors considered and analyses performed by CIBC World Markets in connection with its opinion operated collectively to support its determination as to the fairness of the common stock exchange ratio from a financial point of view. Accordingly, CIBC World Markets believes that its analyses and this summary must be considered as a whole and that selecting portions of its analyses and factors or focusing on information presented in tabular format, without considering all analyses and factors or the narrative description of the analyses, could create a misleading or incomplete view of the processes underlying CIBC World Markets' analyses and opinion.

        In performing its analyses, CIBC World Markets considered industry performance, general business, economic, market and financial conditions and other matters existing as of the date of its opinion, many of which are beyond NOMOS' and NASI's control. No company, transaction or business used in the analyses as a comparison is identical to NOMOS, NASI or the merger, and an evaluation of the results of those analyses is not entirely mathematical. Rather, the analyses involve complex considerations and judgments concerning financial and operating characteristics and other factors that could affect the acquisition, public trading or other values of the companies, business segments or transactions analyzed.

        The estimates contained in CIBC World Markets' analyses and the ranges of valuations resulting from any particular analysis are not necessarily indicative of actual values or future results, which may be significantly more or less favorable than those suggested by its analyses. In addition, analyses relating to the value of businesses or securities do not purport to be appraisals or to reflect the prices at which businesses or securities actually may be sold. Accordingly, CIBC World Markets' analyses and estimates are inherently subject to substantial uncertainty.

        The type and amount of consideration payable in the merger was determined through negotiation between NOMOS and NASI and the decision to enter into the merger was solely that of the NOMOS board of directors. CIBC World Markets did not recommend any specific amount or form of merger consideration to the NOMOS board of directors or that any specific amount or form of merger consideration constituted the only appropriate consideration for the proposed merger. CIBC World Markets' opinion was only one of many factors considered by the NOMOS board of directors in its evaluation of the merger and should not be viewed as determinative of the views of NOMOS' board of directors or management with respect to the merger or the merger consideration.

        The following is a summary of the material financial analyses underlying CIBC World Markets' opinion to the NOMOS board of directors in connection with the merger. The financial analyses summarized below include information presented in tabular format. In order to fully understand CIBC World Markets' financial analyses, the tables must be read together with the text of each summary. The tables alone do not constitute a complete description of the financial analyses. Considering the data in the tables below without considering the full narrative description of the financial analyses, including the methodologies and assumptions underlying the analyses, could create a misleading or incomplete view of CIBC World Markets' financial analyses. For purposes of CIBC World Markets' analyses described below relating to NOMOS, the implied aggregate equity reference ranges derived from those analyses reflect a deduction of the $12.0 million cash portion of the consideration payable in the merger to holders of NOMOS preferred stock.

117


Implied Exchange Ratio Analysis.

        In evaluating the common stock exchange ratio, CIBC World Markets first derived implied aggregate equity reference ranges for NOMOS and NASI based on a "Selected Companies Analysis," "Precedent Transactions Analysis" and "Discounted Cash Flow Analysis" for NOMOS and a "Selected Companies Analysis" and "Discounted Cash Flow Analysis" for NASI. CIBC World Markets also calculated the aggregate market value of NASI, referred to as the NASI Market Value, based on the total number of outstanding shares of NASI common stock as of, and the average closing price of NASI common stock for the three trading days ended, October 22, 2003. CIBC World Markets then calculated implied exchange ratio reference ranges for NOMOS common stock and NASI common stock based on these implied aggregate equity reference ranges and the NASI Market Value. This analysis indicated the following approximate implied exchange ratio reference ranges, as compared to the common stock exchange ratio provided for in the merger of 0.891:

 
  Implied Exchange Ratio/ Reference Range
NASI Selected Companies Analysis—Radiation Oncology / NOMOS Selected Companies Analysis   0.6295 - 0.8734
NASI Selected Companies Analysis—Radiation Oncology / NOMOS Precedent Transactions Analysis   0.5860 - 0.9987
NASI Selected Companies Analysis—Urology/Radiology / NOMOS Selected Companies Analysis   0.4929 - 0.7030
NASI Selected Companies Analysis—Urology/Radiology / NOMOS Precedent Transactions Analysis   0.4589 - 0.8039
NASI Discounted Cash Flow Analysis / NOMOS Discounted Cash Flow Analysis   0.8162 - 1.2943
NASI Market Value / NOMOS Selected Companies Analysis   0.6997 - 0.8206
NASI Market Value / NOMOS Precedent Transactions Analysis   0.6514 - 0.9383
NASI Market Value / NOMOS Discounted Cash Flow Analysis   1.0524 - 1.3404

        Based on the implied aggregate equity reference ranges for NOMOS and NASI used to calculate the above implied exchange ratio reference ranges, CIBC World Markets also calculated ranges of the implied pro forma ownership of NOMOS stockholders in the combined company. This analysis indicated an implied pro forma ownership reference range of approximately 23.6% to 47.5%, as compared to the ownership percentage of NOMOS stockholders in the pro forma company immediately upon completion of the merger of approximately 37.5%.

        The NASI Market Value used in the above Implied Exchange Ratio Analysis was approximately $78.0 million. The implied aggregate equity reference ranges used in the above Implied Exchange Ratio Analysis from the Selected Companies Analysis, Precedent Transactions Analysis and Discounted Cash Flow Analysis for NOMOS and the Selected Companies Analysis and Discounted Cash Flow Analysis for NASI are described below.

NOMOS Analyses

        Selected Companies Analysis.    CIBC World Markets compared financial and stock market information for NOMOS and four selected publicly held companies in the radiation oncology industry, referred to as Radiation Oncology Companies, and eight selected publicly held companies in the medical software industry, referred to as Medical Software Companies. These companies, which are

118


listed below, were selected for comparison with NOMOS primarily because they have a product focus and business operations in industries generally comparable to those of NOMOS.

Radiation Oncology Companies
  Medical Software Companies
  Elekta AB     Cerner Corporation
  NASI     Computer Programs & Systems, Inc.
  Theragenics Corporation     Eclipsys Corporation
  Varian Medical Systems, Inc.     IDX Systems Corporation
          IMPAC Medical Systems, Inc.
          Merge Technologies Incorporated
          Sectra AB
          Vital Images, Inc.

        CIBC World Markets reviewed, among other things, firm values, calculated as equity market value, plus debt, minority interests, preferred stock and out-of-the-money convertible securities, less cash and investments in unconsolidated affiliates, as multiples of calendar years 2003 and 2004 estimated revenues and earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, commonly referred to as EBITDA. All multiples were based on closing stock prices on October 22, 2003. Estimated financial data for the selected Radiation Oncology Companies and Medical Software Companies were based on publicly available research analysts' estimates. Estimated financial data for NOMOS were based on internal estimates of NOMOS' management. CIBC World Markets then applied a range of selected multiples of calendar years 2003 and 2004 estimated revenues and EBITDA derived from the selected Radiation Oncology Companies and Medical Software Companies to corresponding financial data of NOMOS. This analysis indicated an implied aggregate equity reference range for NOMOS of approximately $36.8 million to $43.1 million, which range was then utilized in calculating the implied exchange ratio reference ranges referred to above under "Implied Exchange Ratio Analysis—NASI Selected Companies Analysis—Radiation Oncology / NOMOS Selected Companies Analysis," "—NASI Selected Companies Analysis—Urology/Radiology / NOMOS Selected Companies Analysis" and "—NASI Market Value / NOMOS Selected Companies Analysis".

        Precedent Transactions Analysis.    CIBC World Markets reviewed the firm values and implied transaction multiples in 12 selected transactions in the medical devices and medical software industries. These transactions, which are listed below, were selected for comparison with the merger primarily because they involved target companies with a product focus and business operations in an industry segment in which NOMOS operates for which sufficient information was publicly available.

Acquiror
  Target
  Varian Medical Systems, Inc.     Zmed Inc.
  McKesson Corporation     A.L.I. Technologies Inc.
  Instrumentarium Corporation     Spacelabs Medical, Inc.
  Endocare, Inc.     Timm Medical Technologies Inc.
  Lumenis Ltd.     HGM Medical Laser Systems Inc.
  GE Medical Systems Inc.     Imatron Inc.
  Oxboro Medical, Inc.     Sterion Inc.
  ESC Medical Systems Ltd.     Coherent Medical Group
  Royal Philips Electronics     ADAC Laboratories Inc.
  Siemens Medical Engineering Group     Acuson Corporation
  GE Medical Systems Inc.     OEC Medical Systems, Inc.
  GE Medical Systems Inc.     Marquette Medical Systems, Inc.

        CIBC World Markets reviewed, among other things, firm values, calculated as the equity value implied for the target based on the consideration offered in the selected transaction, plus debt, minority

119



interests, preferred stock and out-of-the-money convertible securities, less cash and investments in unconsolidated affiliates, as multiples of one-year and two-year forward revenues and EBITDA. Estimated financial data for the selected transactions were based on publicly available information at the time of announcement of the relevant transaction. Estimated financial data for NOMOS were based on internal estimates of NOMOS' management. CIBC World Markets then applied a range of selected multiples of one-year and two-year forward revenues and EBITDA derived from the selected transactions to corresponding financial data of NOMOS. This analysis indicated an implied aggregate equity reference range for NOMOS of approximately $34.2 million to $49.3 million, which range was then utilized in calculating the implied exchange ratio reference ranges referred to above under "Implied Exchange Ratio Analysis—NASI Selected Companies Analysis—Radiation Oncology / NOMOS Precedent Transactions Analysis," "—NASI Selected Companies Analysis—Urology/Radiology / NOMOS Precedent Transactions Analysis" and "—NASI Market Value / NOMOS Precedent Transactions Analysis".

        Discounted Cash Flow Analysis.    CIBC World Markets performed a discounted cash flow analysis of NOMOS to calculate the estimated present value of the unlevered, after-tax free cash flows that NOMOS could generate for the fourth quarter of 2003 through the full fiscal year 2008, based on internal estimates of NOMOS' management. CIBC World Markets calculated a range of estimated terminal values by applying revenue terminal value multiples ranging from 1.5x to 2.0x to NOMOS' fiscal year 2008 estimated revenues. The present value of the cash flows and terminal values were calculated using discount rates of 20.0% to 25.0%. Based on this revenue terminal value range and the midpoint of the discount rate range, this analysis indicated an implied aggregate equity reference range for NOMOS of approximately $55.3 million to $70.5 million, which range was then utilized in calculating the implied exchange ratio reference ranges referred to above under "Implied Exchange Ratio Analysis—NASI Discounted Cash Flow Analysis / NOMOS Discounted Cash Flow Analysis" and "—NASI Market Value / NOMOS Discounted Cash Flow Analysis".

NASI Analyses

        Selected Companies Analysis.    CIBC World Markets compared financial and stock market information for NASI and three selected Radiation Oncology Companies and six selected publicly held companies in the urology/radiology industry, referred to as Urology/Radiology Companies. These companies, which are listed below, were selected for comparison with NASI primarily because they have a product focus and business operations in industries generally comparable to those of NASI.

Radiation Oncology Companies
  Urology/Radiology Companies
  Elekta AB     American Medical Systems Holdings, Inc.
  Theragenics Corporation     HealthTronics Surgical Services, Inc.
  Varian Medical Systems, Inc.     Medstone International, Inc.
          Prime Medical Services, Inc.
          RITA Medical Systems, Inc.
          Merge Technologies Inc.
          Urologix, Inc.

        CIBC World Markets reviewed, among other things, firm values as multiples of calendar years 2003 and 2004 estimated revenues and EBITDA. All multiples were based on closing stock prices on October 22, 2003. Estimated financial data for the selected Radiation Oncology Companies and Urology/Radiology Companies were based on publicly available research analysts' estimates. Estimated financial data for NASI were based on internal estimates of NASI's management. CIBC World Markets then applied a range of selected multiples of calendar years 2003 and 2004 estimated revenues and EBITDA derived from the selected Radiation Oncology Companies and Urology/Radiology Companies to corresponding financial data of NASI and, to account for the value of Apomate, added to the

120



resulting equity reference range the value range implied for Apomate based on the Discounted Cash Flow Analysis of Apomate described below. This analysis indicated implied aggregate equity reference ranges for NASI of approximately $73.3 million to $86.7 million based on the Radiation Oncology Companies and approximately $91.1 million to $110.8 million based on the Urology/Radiology Companies, which ranges were then utilized in calculating the implied exchange ratio reference ranges referred to above under "Implied Exchange Ratio Analysis—NASI Selected Companies Analysis—Radiation Oncology / NOMOS Selected Companies Analysis," "—NASI Selected Companies Analysis—Radiation Oncology / NOMOS Precedent Transactions Analysis," "—NASI Selected Companies Analysis—Urology/Radiology / NOMOS Selected Companies Analysis" and "—NASI Selected Companies Analysis—Urology/Radiology / NOMOS Precedent Transactions Analysis".

        Discounted Cash Flow Analysis.    CIBC World Markets performed a discounted cash flow analysis of NASI, excluding NASI's product candidate, Apomate, to calculate the estimated present value of the unlevered, after-tax free cash flows that NASI could generate for the fourth quarter of 2003 through the full fiscal year 2006, based on internal estimates of NASI's management. CIBC World Markets calculated a range of estimated terminal values by applying revenue terminal value multiples ranging from 2.0x to 3.0x to NASI's fiscal year 2006 estimated revenues. The present value of the cash flows and terminal values were calculated using discount rates of 20.0% to 25.0%. CIBC World Markets separately performed a discounted cash flow analysis of Apomate to calculate the estimated present value of the unlevered, after-tax free cash flows that Apomate could generate for the fourth quarter of 2003 through the full fiscal year 2013, based on internal estimates of NASI's management. CIBC World Markets calculated a range of estimated terminal values by applying revenue terminal value multiples ranging from 4.5x to 5.5x to Apomate's estimated revenues for fiscal year 2013. The present value of the cash flows and terminal values were calculated using discount rates of 35.0% to 45.0%. Taken together and based on the revenue terminal value ranges and the midpoint of the discount rate ranges, this analysis indicated an implied aggregate equity reference range for NASI of approximately $80.8 million to $100.6 million, which range was then utilized in calculating the implied exchange ratio reference range referred to above under "Implied Exchange Ratio Analysis—NASI Discounted Cash Flow Analysis / NOMOS Discounted Cash Flow Analysis".

Pro Forma Merger Analysis

        CIBC World Markets analyzed the potential pro forma effect of the merger on NASI's estimated earnings per share, commonly referred to as EPS, in fiscal years 2004 through 2006. Estimated financial data were based on internal estimates of the managements of NOMOS and NASI. This analysis indicated that the merger could reduce the estimated loss per share of NASI on a pro forma basis relative to NASI's estimated EPS on a standalone basis in fiscal years 2004 and 2005, and could be accretive to NASI's estimated EPS in fiscal year 2006. The actual results achieved by the combined company may vary from projected results and the variations may be material.

Other Factors

        In rendering its opinion, CIBC World Markets also reviewed and considered other factors, including the following:

121


Miscellaneous

        NOMOS has agreed to pay CIBC World Markets upon consummation of the merger an aggregate fee equal to a percentage of the total consideration, including liabilities assumed, to be paid by NASI in the merger. It is currently estimated that the aggregate fee payable to CIBC World Markets will be approximately $1.7 million, of which approximately $1.5 million is contingent upon consummation of the merger and against which any portion of the aggregate fee previously paid will be credited. In addition, NOMOS has agreed to reimburse CIBC World Markets for its reasonable expenses, including reasonable fees and expenses of its legal counsel, and to indemnify CIBC World Markets and related parties against liabilities, including liabilities under the federal securities laws, relating to, or arising out of, its engagement. CIBC World Markets and its affiliates in the past have provided, and currently are providing, services to NASI unrelated to the proposed merger, for which services CIBC World Markets and its affiliates have received, and expect to receive, compensation. In the ordinary course of business, CIBC World Markets and its affiliates may actively trade securities of NASI for their own account and for the accounts of customers and, accordingly, may at any time hold a long or short position in those securities.

        NOMOS selected CIBC World Markets as its financial advisor based on CIBC World Markets' reputation and experience. CIBC World Markets is an internationally recognized investment banking firm and, as a customary part of its investment banking business, is regularly engaged in valuations of businesses and securities in connection with acquisitions and mergers, underwritings, secondary distributions of securities, private placements and valuations for other purposes.

122



INTERESTS OF CERTAIN PERSONS IN THE MERGER

Interests of Executive Officers and Directors of NASI and NOMOS in the Merger

        In considering the recommendation of NASI's board of directors and NOMOS' board of directors in favor of the merger, NASI and NOMOS stockholders should be aware that some of the directors and executive officers of NASI and NOMOS have interests in the merger that are in addition to, and that may be different from, the interests of the NASI and NOMOS stockholders generally. Specific agreements and arrangements with certain directors and executive officers are described below. NASI's board of directors and NOMOS' board of directors were aware of these interests (to the extent they existed at the time) and considered them in its decision to approve the merger agreement and the merger. NASI and NOMOS stockholders should consider these interests carefully before voting on the merger. In particular, all executive officers have interests in the combined company as employees in terms of job responsibilities, working environment and compensation (or, in the case of NOMOS officers, the right to receive severance payments if they are not retained by NASI) which are in addition to and different from their interests as stockholders. All continuing directors will have the responsibility for being directors of a larger company after the merger. These interested individuals participated in the deliberation of NOMOS' board of directors regarding the merger; however, the interests of such individuals (to the extent they existed at the time) were fully disclosed to the NOMOS disinterested directors at the time of such deliberation.

NASI Board of Directors Representation

        NASI and NOMOS have agreed that, immediately after the consummation of the merger, NASI will take all actions necessary to expand its board of directors to consist of nine members. Seven of the nine members will be persons who served on NASI's board of directors immediately prior to the completion of the merger. The two additional members will be John W. Manzetti and John A. Friede.

Loan Forgiveness—John A. Friede

        Mr. Friede currently owes NOMOS $287,160 plus interest, which principal amount was loaned to Mr. Friede on May 22, 2003. Upon the consummation of the merger, and in partial consideration for the time, efforts and resources that Mr. Friede has provided NOMOS in the past, NOMOS has agreed to cancel this indebtedness. The cancellation of this indebtedness is conditioned upon the consummation of the merger but will become effective immediately prior to the consummation of the merger.

Severance Agreement—John A. Friede

        NOMOS is party to a letter agreement dated February 11, 2002 with Mr. Friede, which provides that if Mr. Friede's employment is terminated without cause, he will receive continued payment of his base salary, which is currently $180,000 per year, and health benefits for twelve months after the termination date. Mr. Friede will be terminated as an employee without cause following the consummation of the merger. Therefore NASI, as NOMOS' successor, will be obligated to pay this severance to Mr. Friede.

Series C Standstill Agreement

        NOMOS' current certificate of incorporation grants the holders of its series C preferred stock certain redemption rights with respect to their series C preferred stock, which redemption rights became exercisable beginning on March 2, 2004 by the holders of at least fifty percent of the then outstanding shares of series C preferred stock. See "Comparison of Stockholder Rights and Corporate Governance Matters—Redemption and Exchange Features". In anticipation of this upcoming date and in connection with the signing of the Second Amendment to Agreement and Plan of Merger, NOMOS,

123



with the consent of NASI, entered into a standstill agreement on March 1, 2004 with certain of its stockholder who held in excess of fifty-percent of the then outstanding shares of series C preferred stock. Pursuant to this standstill agreement, the signing stockholders agreed (as to themselves and on behalf of any transferee) not to exercise their series C redemption rights prior to the earlier to occur of (i) July 1, 2004, or (ii) the termination of the merger agreement in accordance with its terms. In consideration of this standstill agreement, and as compensation for the lost time value of money and the potential loss of accrued dividends, NOMOS agreed to pay to the signing stockholders as well as all other holders of series C preferred stock, concurrently with the closing of the merger, an amount of $0.15 per share of series C preferred stock held by them, or an aggregate of $200,422.77. John L. Cassis, a member of the NOMOS board of directors, beneficially owns approximately 32% of the outstanding NOMOS series C preferred stock and, accordingly, he (or entities with which he is affiliated) would receive a significant portion of such consideration if paid. However, if the merger agreement is terminated in accordance with its terms without the merger having been consummated, NOMOS will be relieved of its obligation to pay such consideration. The standstill agreement is attached as Annex K to this to this joint proxy statement/prospectus. We encourage you to read the standstill agreement carefully.

Cash Merger Consideration—John A. Friede and John L. Cassis

        The merger agreement provides for a combination of cash and NASI common stock to be paid to the NOMOS stockholders. All of the cash consideration in the merger, other than with respect to fractional shares, will be paid to the holders of NOMOS series B preferred stock and series C preferred stock. Mr. Friede beneficially owns approximately 80% of the outstanding NOMOS series B preferred stock and John L. Cassis beneficially owns approximately 32% of the outstanding NOMOS series C preferred stock. See "The Merger Agreement" and "Beneficial Ownership of Capital Stock of NOMOS".

Employment Agreement with John W. Manzetti

        NASI will enter into, and cause the surviving corporation in the merger, a wholly owned subsidiary of NASI, to enter into, a new employment agreement with Mr. Manzetti, which will become effective upon consummation of the merger, and which will supersede his existing agreement with NOMOS, a form of which is attached as an exhibit to the Registration Statement of which this joint proxy statement/prospectus forms a part. The agreement will provide that Mr. Manzetti will serve as president of the surviving corporation, and will be entitled to an annual base salary of no less than $300,000 and a minimum incentive bonus of 25% of his base salary if specified performance goals are met. The agreement will be for an initial term of two years, and will automatically renew for additional one-year terms unless notice of non-renewal is delivered at least 90 days prior to the date when the agreement term is scheduled to expire. In addition, under the agreement, NASI will grant Mr. Manzetti stock options to purchase 40,000 shares of NASI common stock at a per share exercise price equal to the fair market value of NASI's common stock on the date the merger is consummated. The stock options will vest equally over a four-year period, with options to purchase 10,000 shares of NASI common stock vesting on each of the first, second, third and fourth anniversaries of the agreement.

        Mr. Manzetti will be entitled to severance payments if (a) the company terminates or fails to renew the agreement, other than for "cause" (as defined in the agreement), or (b) the agreement is terminated or not renewed by Mr. Manzetti for "good reason" (as defined in the agreement). The severance amount payable to Mr. Manzetti is equal to (i) 24 months of Mr. Manzetti's annual base salary if terminated in his first year of employment, (ii) 18 months of Mr. Manzetti's annual base salary if terminated in his second year of employment (or if his employment is not renewed for a third year) and (iii) 12 months of Mr. Manzetti's annual base salary if terminated (or his employment is not renewed) at any point thereafter. The company may pay the severance in one lump sum or as salary

124



continuation over a one-year period. In addition to the cash severance, Mr. Manzetti will be entitled to health benefits for a period of 24 months following the termination of (or failure to renew) his employment. If Mr. Manzetti is terminated because of a "disability" (as defined in the agreement), he will be entitled to a severance payment equal to six months of his annual base salary, and all unvested stock options owned by Mr. Manzetti at such time shall immediately vest.

        If there is a "change of control" (as defined in the agreement) and Mr. Manzetti is not employed by the successor entity in the same or similar capacity (at the same level of compensation, including bonus opportunity) after such change of control, (i) Mr. Manzetti will be entitled to a severance amount equal to his annual base salary, plus his highest bonus earned in the prior two years and (ii) all stock options owned by Mr. Manzetti at such time will become immediately vested.

Treatment of NOMOS Stock Options

        In the merger, each outstanding stock option exercisable for NOMOS common stock will be converted into an option to purchase common stock of NASI as of the date of the consummation of the merger. The number of shares of NASI common stock underlying each new option will equal the number of shares of NOMOS common stock for which the NOMOS stock option was exercisable prior to the merger, multiplied by 0.891. The per share exercise price of each new NASI option will be equal to the per share exercise price of the corresponding NOMOS stock option divided by 0.891. In addition, effective on the consummation of the merger, all outstanding unvested NOMOS stock options held by current NOMOS directors and employees will immediately vest. All other terms of the stock options will remain unchanged after the consummation of the merger. See "The Merger Agreement".

Treatment of NOMOS Warrants

        Each outstanding warrant to purchase shares of NOMOS common stock will, upon consummation of the merger, be assumed by NASI. Each warrant assumed by NASI under the merger agreement will continue to have, and be subject to, the same terms and conditions of the original warrant, except that (i) each warrant will be exercisable for a number of shares of NASI common stock equal to the number of shares of NOMOS common stock that were subject to such warrant immediately prior to the merger multiplied by 0.891, rounded down to the nearest whole number of shares of NASI common stock, and (ii) the per share exercise price for the shares of NASI common stock issuable upon exercise of such assumed warrant will be equal to the quotient determined by dividing the per share exercise price of NOMOS common stock at which such warrant was exercisable immediately prior to merger by 0.891, rounded up to the nearest whole cent.

Indemnification; Directors' and Officers' Insurance

        The merger agreement provides that, for a period of six years following the consummation of the merger, and to the full extent permitted by applicable law and NOMOS' certificate of incorporation and bylaws, NASI will cause the surviving corporation to indemnify and hold harmless each person who is or was a director or officer of NOMOS at or at any time prior to the completion of the merger against losses incurred as a result of actions or omissions (or alleged actions or omissions) occurring at or prior to the completion of the merger. For a period of six years after the consummation of the merger, NASI will cause the surviving corporation to maintain (to the extent available in the market) in effect a directors' and officers' liability insurance policy covering those persons who are covered by the directors' and officers' liability insurance policy currently maintained by NOMOS, with coverage in amount and scope at least as favorable to such persons as NOMOS' existing coverage, but NASI shall only be obligated to cause such liability insurance to be maintained to the extent it costs no more than 150% of the annual premium currently paid by NOMOS for such coverage, and, if the annual premium exceeds such amount, NASI shall cause the surviving corporation to obtain as much coverage as possible for such amount. See "The Merger Agreement".

125



THE MERGER AGREEMENT

        The following is a summary of the material terms of the merger agreement, as amended. This summary does not purport to describe all of the terms of the merger agreement, the first amendment to the merger agreement or the second amendment to the merger agreement and is qualified by reference to the complete merger agreement which is included as Annex A-1, Annex A-2 and Annex A-3 to this joint proxy statement/prospectus and incorporated by reference herein. References throughout this joint proxy statement/prospectus to the merger agreement shall mean the merger agreement as amended by the first amendment and the second amendment as discussed below in the section entitled "—Amendment, Extension and Waivers". All stockholders of NASI and NOMOS are urged to read the entire merger agreement carefully.

General

        Under the merger agreement, NOMOS will merge with and into AM Capital I, Inc. ("AMC"), a wholly owned subsidiary of NASI, with AMC continuing as the surviving corporation. AMC will change its name immediately following the merger to "NOMOS Corporation".

Closing Matters

        Closing.    Unless the parties agree otherwise, the consummation of the merger will take place as promptly as practicable (but in no event later than the third business day) after all closing conditions have been satisfied or waived by the parties at the offices of McDermott, Will & Emery, 2049 Century Park East, 34th Floor, Los Angeles, California 90067. See "—Conditions to Completion of the Merger" below for a more complete description of the conditions that must be satisfied or waived prior to closing.

        Completion of the Merger.    As soon as practicable after the satisfaction or waiver of the conditions to the merger, the parties will file a certificate of merger with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware in accordance with the relevant provisions of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware. The merger will become effective when the certificate of merger is filed or at such later time as the parties agree and specify in the certificate of merger.

Consideration to be Received in the Merger; Treatment of Stock Options and Warrants

        The merger agreement provides that, at the completion of the merger:

126


        As soon as practicable after the completion of the merger, NASI will (a) deliver notices to the holders of NOMOS stock options setting forth each holder's rights pursuant thereto and (b) deliver appropriate option agreements with respect to the replacement options upon surrender of the corresponding NOMOS stock option agreements. Promptly (but in no event later than 45 days) after the completion of the merger, NASI shall file registration statements on Form S-8 with respect to the NASI common stock subject to such replacement options and use commercially reasonable efforts to maintain the effectiveness thereof for so long as such replacement options remain outstanding.

        As soon as practicable after the completion of the merger, NASI will deliver notices to the holders of NOMOS warrants setting forth each holder's rights pursuant thereto.

Amendment of NOMOS Certificate of Incorporation

        On November 25, 2003, NOMOS' board of directors, by unanimous written consent, adopted an amended and restated certificate of incorporation, to become effective immediately prior to the consummation of the merger, which amended certificate would confirm that, upon the consummation of the merger, the holders of NOMOS' common stock and each of NOMOS' series of preferred stock would be entitled to receive, and would only be entitled to receive, the merger consideration and other treatment provided for in the merger agreement. Under NOMOS' existing certificate of incorporation, an amendment to the certificate of incorporation requires the approval of the holders of (i) a majority of the outstanding common stock, (ii) a majority of the outstanding series A preferred stock, (iii) a majority of the outstanding series B preferred stock and (iv) at least 75% of the outstanding series C preferred stock, voting both together as one class on an as-converted-to-common stock basis, and as separate classes. Pursuant to the terms of a voting agreement, certain principal stockholders of NOMOS holding, in the aggregate, approximately 52% of NOMOS' outstanding shares of common stock, 59% of NOMOS' outstanding shares of series A preferred stock, 80% of NOMOS' outstanding shares of series B preferred stock and 85% of NOMOS' outstanding shares of series C preferred stock, agreed to vote all of their shares in favor of the amended and restated certificate of incorporation to

127



become effective immediately prior to the consummation of the merger. Pursuant to a written consent dated January 6, 2004, NOMOS stockholders having sufficient votes to do so, approved and adopted the amended and restated certificate of incorporation. The amended and restated certificate of incorporation will take effect immediately prior to the consummation of the merger. If the merger is not consummated, the amended and restated certificate of incorporation will not become effective.

Exchange of Stock Certificates in the Merger

        Before the consummation of the merger, an exchange agent will be appointed to handle the exchange of NOMOS stock certificates for certificates evidencing shares of NASI common stock and the payment of cash for such shares and fractional shares. Promptly after the consummation of the merger, the exchange agent will send a letter of transmittal to each former NOMOS stockholder explaining the procedure for surrendering NOMOS stock certificates in exchange for certificates representing the number of shares of NASI common stock into which the shares of NOMOS common stock and preferred stock were converted in the merger.

        After the completion of the merger, each certificate that previously represented shares of NOMOS common stock or preferred stock will only represent the right to receive the shares of NASI common stock and cash into which those shares of NOMOS common stock and preferred stock have been converted. In addition, after the completion of the merger, NOMOS will not register any transfers of the shares of NOMOS common stock. NASI stockholders need not exchange their stock certificates.

Fractional Shares

        No fractional shares of NASI common stock will be issued in the merger. Instead, the exchange agent will pay each of those stockholders who would have otherwise been entitled to a fractional share of NASI common stock an amount in cash determined by multiplying the fractional share interest by the average closing price, as reported on the Nasdaq National Market, of one share of NASI common stock for the ten consecutive trading days ending on and including the last trading day prior to the date of completion of the merger. No cash will be paid in lieu of fractional shares that would result if the shares underlying the NOMOS stock options and warrants were not rounded down in accordance with the merger agreement.

Covenants

        Each of NASI and NOMOS has undertaken certain covenants in the merger agreement restricting the conduct of its respective businesses between the date the merger agreement was signed and the completion of the merger. Some of these covenants are complicated and not easily summarized. You are urged to read carefully the section of the merger agreement entitled "Conduct of Business". The following summarizes the more significant of these covenants:

        Conduct of Business.    Except as expressly required by, or provided for, in the merger agreement, or agreed to by the other party in writing, each of NOMOS, NASI and their respective subsidiaries is required to carry on its business in the ordinary course, consistent with past practice and to use all reasonable efforts to (i) preserve intact its current business organization and goodwill and (ii) preserve its business relationships with its material customers and others having material business relationships with them.

        Required Consent.    Without the prior written consent of the other party, and with certain exceptions described in the merger agreement (which exceptions apply to certain but not all of the following items), none of NOMOS, NASI or any of their respective subsidiaries may take any of the following actions:

128


        No Solicitation.    Each of NASI and NOMOS has agreed that, except in certain circumstances described below, NASI and NOMOS will not, nor will either company authorize or permit any of its directors, officers, employees, investment bankers, attorneys, accountants or other advisors or representatives to directly or indirectly take any of the following actions:

        The merger agreement also provides that each party will promptly advise the other of the terms of and identity of the person making any acquisition proposal or any inquiry or request for information relating to any acquisition proposal, the status and terms of any such discussions or negotiations and copies of all correspondence and other written material received in connection with such acquisition proposal.

        An "acquisition proposal" means, with respect to any party, any offer or proposal by any person other than NASI, with respect to NOMOS, relating to any transaction or series of transactions other than transactions contemplated by the merger agreement involving:

129


        Each of NASI and NOMOS has agreed that, except in certain circumstances described below, their respective board of directors, and any committee thereof, will not take any of the following actions:

        Prior to the approval of the merger and merger agreement at NOMOS stockholders' meeting, NOMOS, in response to an unsolicited acquisition proposal that is, or that is reasonably likely to result in, a "superior proposal" (as defined below) may (i) furnish information with respect to NOMOS to a person making such superior proposal and (ii) participate in discussions or negotiations with such person regarding such superior proposal if all of the following conditions are met:

        In response to a superior proposal, NOMOS' board of directors may withdraw or modify its recommendation in favor of the merger agreement, the proposed merger and the other transactions contemplated by the merger agreement if all of the following conditions are met:

130


        In addition, before any meeting of NOMOS' board of directors regarding a superior proposal, NOMOS must give NASI (i) a copy of the definitive documentation relating to such superior proposal to the extent not already provided to NASI and (ii) at least:

        A "superior proposal," means any unsolicited, bona fide written acquisition proposal to NOMOS (i) on terms that NOMOS' board of directors has in good faith, after consultation with an internationally recognized independent financial advisor, determined to be more favorable from a financial point of view to its stockholders than the merger after taking into account all of the terms and conditions of such proposal and the merger agreement (including any proposal by NASI to amend the terms of the merger agreement) and (ii) that is reasonably capable of being consummated on the terms proposed, taking into account all financial, regulatory, legal and other aspects of such acquisition proposal.

        No acquisition proposal or change of recommendation will limit or otherwise affect the obligation of NOMOS to call, give notice of, convene and hold the special meeting of its stockholders in connection with the merger that is the subject of this joint proxy statement/prospectus.

Other Covenants and Agreements

        Expenses.    Each company has agreed to pay its own costs and expenses incurred in connection with the merger and the merger agreement. Each company has agreed to pay 50% of any expenses incurred in connection with the HSR Act filing fees, if any, and the costs associated with the printing and mailing of this joint proxy statement/prospectus.

        Election to NASI's Board of Directors.    Immediately after the consummation of the merger, NASI will take all actions necessary to expand its board of directors to consist of nine members. Seven of the nine members will be persons who served on NASI's board of directors immediately prior to the consummation of the merger. The two additional members will be John W. Manzetti and John A. Friede.

        Other Covenants and Agreements.    The merger agreement contains certain other covenants and agreements, including covenants relating to:

131


Representations and Warranties

        The merger agreement contains substantially reciprocal representations and warranties, many of which are qualified by materiality, made by each of NASI and NOMOS to the other. The representations and warranties relate to, among other topics, the following:

132


        The merger agreement also contains certain representations and warranties of NOMOS which relate to the following topics:

Conditions to Completion of the Merger

        The obligations of NOMOS and NASI to effect the merger are subject to the satisfaction of the following conditions:

133


        In addition, the obligations of NOMOS to effect the merger are subject to the satisfaction or waiver of the following additional conditions:

        In addition, the obligations of NASI to effect the merger are subject to the satisfaction or waiver of the following additional conditions:

134


        Either party to the merger agreement can elect to waive a condition to its obligation to complete the merger although that condition has not been satisfied. NASI has received an executed copy of the stockholders' voting agreement referenced in the final bullet point above. In addition, the parties do not believe that a filing or waiting period under the Hart-Scott Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976, as amended, is required in connection with the proposed merger, nor are the parties aware of any other filings or waiting periods that would apply to the proposed merger under applicable anti-trust laws. We cannot be certain when (or if) the other conditions to the merger will be satisfied or waived or that the merger will be completed. We do not intend to consummate the merger if the NASI common stock is not approved for quotation on the NASDAQ National Market System or listed for trading on a national securities exchange. In the event that either party waives any of the other conditions to the merger, we do not intend to amend this proxy statement/prospectus or resolicit proxies to vote in favor of the merger prior to the special meeting.

Escrow Arrangement; Indemnification Escrow Agreement

        As a condition to NASI's willingness to enter into the merger agreement, John A. Friede (as "Stockholder Representative" acting on behalf of all of NOMOS stockholders) is entering into an indemnification escrow agreement with NASI, NOMOS and U.S. Bank National Association (the "Escrow Agent"). Pursuant to the merger agreement, an aggregate of approximately 15.8% of the shares of NASI common stock and cash otherwise issuable or payable in the merger to holders of NOMOS capital stock will automatically be deposited in two separate escrow funds upon the consummation of the merger. An aggregate of up to approximately 526,810 shares of NASI common stock and approximately $1.2 million of the cash will be held with the Escrow Agent in an escrow fund (the "General Escrow Fund") for a period of two years following the effective time of the merger and will serve as a source of reimbursement to NASI, AM Capital I, Inc., and their respective officers, directors, employees, consultants, stockholders and affiliates (collectively the "Indemnified Parties") for, among other things: (i) any losses arising from any breach by NOMOS of its representations and warranties in the merger agreement, other than with respect to the Parker/Hunter matter; or (ii) any failure by NOMOS to perform its covenants and obligations under the merger agreement. An aggregate of 307,617 shares of NASI common stock and $700,800 of the cash will be held in a second escrow fund (the "Special Escrow Fund") to serve as a source of reimbursement to the Indemnified Parties for any losses incurred by the Indemnified Parties or NOMOS before the consummation of the merger and by the Indemnified Parties after the consummation of the merger arising out of the demand made against NOMOS by Parker/Hunter Incorporated as discussed above in the section entitled "Information Regarding NOMOS—Legal Proceedings".

135



        Subject to holdbacks for any unresolved claims, the General Escrow Fund will terminate on the second anniversary of the effective date of the merger. The Escrow Consideration remaining in the General Escrow Fund, if any, will be distributed to the former holders of NOMOS capital stock that contributed such shares of NASI common stock and cash to the General Escrow Fund within 10 days after the second anniversary of the completion of the merger except for any amounts that may be subject to such unsatisfied claims for indemnification, which will be distributed promptly upon the resolution of all pending claims, and any amounts payable to the stockholder representative with respect to such rights of indemnification. The Special Escrow Fund will terminate upon the final resolution of the dispute related to the demand made against NOMOS by Parker/Hunter. Such final resolution shall be documented by a final non-appealable judgment or order of a court of competent jurisdiction or a written memorandum signed by the stockholder representative and a person authorized to sign on behalf of NASI. For more information regarding the escrow arrangements, we encourage you to review the form of indemnification escrow agreement attached as Annex D to this joint proxy statement/prospectus as well as Section 3.6 and Article XII of the merger agreement, which is attached as Annex A-1, Annex A-2 and Annex A-3 to this joint proxy statement/prospectus. You should note that, pursuant to the first amendment to the merger agreement (see Annex A-2), the parties have agreed to make certain modifications to the form of Indemnification Escrow Agreement attached hereto as Annex D prior to the consummation of the merger.

Stockholder Representative

        John A. Friede will serve as the representative of NOMOS stockholders under the indemnification escrow agreement and shall have full power and authority to represent the NOMOS stockholders with respect to all matters arising under the indemnification escrow agreement, including the power to object to claims for reimbursement, to negotiate and enter into settlements and compromises with respect to such claims and to take certain other actions with respect to claims made against the Escrow Consideration in the escrow funds. It is anticipated that the parties will provide for indemnification of Mr. Friede, as the stockholder representative, out of any amounts remaining in the general escrow fund after the termination of the escrow agreement and prior to distributions to former NOMOS stockholders.

Termination of Merger Agreement

        Right to Terminate.    The merger agreement may be terminated at any time prior to the completion of the merger under the following circumstances:

136


Termination Fee

        If terminated, the merger agreement will become void and, except in circumstances where a termination fee is payable, neither party will have any liability to the other party under the merger agreement. Upon a termination, a party may become obligated to pay to the other party a termination fee, as described below:

        NOMOS will be obligated to pay a termination fee to NASI equal to $3,000,000 if all of the following conditions are met:

        NASI will be obligated to pay a termination fee to NOMOS equal to $1,500,000 if all of the following conditions are met:

137


        A "third party acquisition" means any of the following transactions, other than the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement:

Amendments, Extensions and Waivers

        Subject to applicable law, the parties may amend the merger agreement in writing at any time prior to the completion of the merger. In addition, at any time prior to the completion of the merger, any party to the merger agreement may (i) extend the time for performance of any of the obligations of the other party, (ii) waive any inaccuracies in the representations and warranties of the other party and (iii) waive compliance by the other party with any of the agreements or conditions in the merger agreement. However, after a party has received the approval of its stockholders, no amendment or waiver can be made that by law requires further stockholder approval without such further approval.

        On November 25, 2003, NASI and NOMOS entered into a first amendment to the merger agreement to provide for an additional escrow arrangement relating to any losses arising out of the demand made against NOMOS by Parker/Hunter Incorporated as discussed in the section entitled "Information Regarding NOMOS—Legal Proceedings". Please also see "—Escrow Arrangements; Indemnification Escrow Agreement". A copy of the first amendment is included as Annex A-2 to this joint proxy statement/prospectus.

        On March 2, 2004, NASI and NOMOS entered into a second amendment to the merger agreement to extend the "Termination Date" in the merger agreement which is the date after which the parties have certain rights to terminate the merger, from April 16, 2004 to June 18, 2004. This second amendment was entered into when it became clear that due to certain delays occasioned by the preparation and SEC review of this joint proxy statement/prospectus that the closing of the merger was unlikely to occur prior to April 16, 2004. A copy of the second amendment is included as Annex A-3 to this joint proxy statement/prospectus.

138



RELATED AGREEMENTS

        This section of the joint proxy statement/prospectus describes agreements related to the merger agreement. While NASI and NOMOS believe that these descriptions cover the material terms of these agreements, these summaries may not contain all of the information that is important to you. Forms of these agreements are attached as exhibits to this joint proxy statement/prospectus as Annexes.

        Voting Agreement; Irrevocable Proxies and Voting Trust.    As a condition to NASI entering into the merger agreement, John A. Friede entered into a voting agreement and executed irrevocable proxies with respect to NOMOS capital stock and NASI capital stock subject to the voting agreement and entered into a voting trust in connection with the voting agreement. By entering into the voting agreement, Mr. Friede has agreed to the following:

        The irrevocable proxies with respect to the NOMOS capital stock and NASI capital stock subject to the voting agreement appoint Michael Cutrer, president and chief executive officer and Alan Edrick, senior vice president and chief financial officer, respectively of NASI as the proxies for Mr. Friede to vote such shares in accordance with the voting agreement.

        Approximately 1,510,574 shares of NOMOS common stock, 40,101 shares of NOMOS series A preferred stock and 1,481,035 shares of NOMOS series B preferred stock owned by Mr. Friede, representing approximately 41% of the total voting power of NOMOS common stock and preferred stock voting together on an as-converted-to-common stock basis outstanding as of January 15, 2004, is subject to the terms of the voting agreement. Mr. Friede was not paid additional consideration in connection with the voting agreement.

        In addition, Mr. Friede has agreed to place into a voting trust all shares of NASI capital stock over which he acquires beneficial ownership other than (a) pursuant to the merger, (b) through the exercise of stock options held by Mr. Friede as of the date of consummation of the merger or granted to

139



Mr. Friede by NASI in connection with his services as a NASI director, into the voting trust. The voting trust will appoint a trustee over the shares of NASI capital stock deposited into the trust and grants the trustees full power and authority to vote such deposited shares of NASI capital stock on behalf of the depositors of such shares.

        The voting agreement will terminate upon the earlier to occur of the termination of the merger agreement or the second anniversary of the consummation of the merger. The irrevocable proxy with respect to the NOMOS capital stock will terminate upon the earlier to occur of the termination of the merger agreement or the date of effectiveness of the merger. The irrevocable proxy with respect to the NASI capital stock will terminate upon the earlier to occur of the termination of the merger agreement or the second anniversary of the consummation of the merger. The voting trust will terminate upon the second anniversary of the date of consummation of the merger. The voting agreement and irrevocable proxies are contained within Annex B to this joint proxy statement/prospectus and the form of voting trust is contained within Annex C to this joint proxy statement/prospectus. We encourage you to read the voting agreement, irrevocable proxies and form of voting trust carefully.

        Registration Rights Agreement.    A condition to NOMOS' willingness to enter into the merger agreement is that NASI enter into a registration rights agreement with the following NOMOS stockholders: John A. Friede, Corporate Opportunities Fund, L.P., Corporate Opportunities Fund (Institutional), L.P., Cross Atlantic Partners, Inc., Cross Atlantic Partners I, K/S, Cross Atlantic Partners II, Cross Atlantic Partners III, Cross Atlantic Partners IV, K/S, Nordea Bank Danmark A/S, A. Carey Zesiger, Alexa L. Zesiger, Barrie Ramsay Zesiger and Nicola L. Zesiger which stockholders will hold, upon completion of the merger, approximately 3.2 million shares of NASI common stock in the aggregate. By entering into the registration rights agreement, NASI has agreed that in the event that NASI proposes to file a registration statement (other than a registration statement on form S-4 or S-8) with respect to NASI common stock for NASI's account pursuant to an underwritten offering, NASI will, subject to certain exceptions and upon the written request of the NOMOS stockholders, register the shares of NASI common stock held by such NOMOS stockholders along with the proposed shares of NASI common stock to be registered for NASI's own account. The participation of such NOMOS stockholders in such registration is subject to certain reductions that may be required by the managing underwriters. NASI has also agreed to include the shares of NASI stock held by the NOMOS stockholders if NASI proposes to file a registration statement related to the resale of restricted securities issued in connection with certain business combinations or disposition transactions.

        The form of registration rights agreement is attached within Annex E to this joint proxy statement/prospectus. We encourage you to read the form of registration rights agreement carefully.

        Affiliate Letters.    A condition of NASI's obligation to consummate the merger is that each officer, director or other person who is an "affiliate" (as that term is used in Rule 145 promulgated under the Securities Act) of NOMOS have executed and delivered an affiliate letter to NASI. By entering into the affiliate letter, each such person acknowledges that they may be deemed an affiliate of NOMOS and agrees not to make any sale, transfer, encumbrance, pledge or disposition of any NASI common stock received by such person in the merger in violation of the Securities Act or the rules and regulation of the Securities and Exchange Commission.

        The form of affiliate letter is attached within Annex F to this joint proxy statement/prospectus. We encourage you to read the form of affiliate letter carefully.

        Lock-Up Agreements.    A condition to NASI's obligation to consummate the merger is that each person executing an affiliate letter and a minimum number of employees of NOMOS who hold outstanding equity securities of NOMOS on or prior to the date of effectiveness of the merger, and certain other persons, execute and deliver an appropriate lock-up agreement to NASI. By entering into the lock-up agreements with NASI, these persons, subject to certain conditions and exceptions, agree to

140



limit the sale or transfer of the shares of NASI common stock that these stockholders may receive in connection with the proposed merger. By signing this agreement, these stockholders agree not to sell or otherwise transfer any shares of NASI common stock received in connection with the proposed merger for a period of six months, twelve months or eighteen months (depending upon the terms of the particular lock-up agreement entered into) following the completion of the merger.

        The form of lock-up agreement is attached within Annex G to this joint proxy statement/prospectus. We encourage you to read the form of lock-up agreement carefully.

        Copromotion Agreement.    On December 8, 2003, NASI and NOMOS entered into a copromotion agreement under which NASI has agreed to market and promote to its customers NOMOS' BAT product, and NOMOS has agreed to market and promote to its customers NASI's brachytherapy seeds. Under the agreement, representatives of NASI and NOMOS will use their best efforts to market and promote the other party's products. Upon a sale by NOMOS of its BAT product and a commitment by the customer to purchase a guaranteed minimum number of cases of NASI's brachytherapy seeds, NOMOS will offer a cash voucher to the customer as a promotional incentive to purchase NASI's seeds. Upon a sale by NASI of a guaranteed minimum number of cases of its seeds and a commitment by the customer to purchase NOMOS' BAT product, NASI will offer a cash voucher and an extended warranty to the customer as a promotional incentive to purchase NOMOS' BAT product. The parties are required to remit any credit amounts due to the other party on a monthly basis. Each party is responsible for the manufacture, shipment and pricing of its products. The copromotion agreement is terminable by either party on fifteen days prior written notice to the other party.

141



PRO FORMA FINANCIAL DATA

Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Consolidated Financial Statements of
North American Scientific, Inc. and NOMOS Corporation

        The following unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated financial statements of the combined company give effect to the merger of NASI and NOMOS in a transaction to be accounted for as a purchase with NASI treated as the acquiror. The unaudited pro forma condensed combined consolidated balance sheet as of January 31, 2004 combines the historical consolidated balance sheets of NASI as of January 31, 2004 and NOMOS as of December 31, 2003, giving effect to the merger as if it occurred on January 31, 2004. The unaudited pro forma condensed combined consolidated statements of operations for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2003 combine the historical consolidated statements of operations of NASI and NOMOS for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2003 and for the twelve months ended September 30, 2003, respectively, giving effect to the merger as if it occurred on November 1, 2002, reflecting only pro forma adjustments expected to have a continuing impact on the combined results. The unaudited pro forma condensed combined consolidated statements of operations for the three months ended January 31, 2004 combine the historical consolidated statements of operations of NASI and NOMOS for the three months ended January 31, 2004 and for the three months ended December 31, 2003, respectively, giving effect to the merger as if it occurred on November 1, 2002, reflecting only pro forma adjustments expected to have a continuing impact on the combined results. The assumptions, estimates and adjustments are preliminary and have been made solely for purposes of developing such pro forma information. The NOMOS statement of operations data for the twelve months ended September 30, 2003 were the result of combining the results of operations data for the three months ended December 31, 2002 and the nine months ended September 30, 2003. The three months ended December 31, 2002 data was derived by taking the audited results of operations for the year ended December 31, 2002 less the unaudited results of operations data for the nine months ended September 30, 2002. The three months ended December 31, 2003 data was derived by taking the audited results of operations from the year ended December 31, 2003 less the unaudited results of operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2003.

        Under the purchase method of accounting, the total estimated purchase price, calculated as described in Note 1 to these unaudited pro forma condensed combined consolidated financial statements, is allocated to the net tangible and intangible assets of NOMOS acquired in connection with the merger based on their fair values as of the completion of the merger. A preliminary valuation was conducted in order to assist management of NASI in determining the fair values of a significant portion of these assets. This preliminary valuation has been considered in management's estimate of the fair values reflected in these unaudited pro forma condensed combined consolidated financial statements. A final determination of these fair values, which cannot be made prior to the completion of the merger, will include management's consideration of a final valuation. This final valuation will be based on the actual net tangible and intangible assets of NOMOS that exist as of the date of the completion of the merger.

        Further, the unaudited condensed combined consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments for liabilities resulting from integration planning, as management is in the process of making these assessments and estimates of such costs are not currently known.

        These unaudited pro forma condensed combined consolidated financial statements have been prepared based on preliminary estimates of fair values. Amounts allocated to intangible assets may increase significantly, which could result in a material increase in amortization of intangible assets. Therefore, the actual amounts recorded as of the completion of the merger may differ materially from the information presented in these unaudited pro forma condensed combined consolidated financial statements. The impact of ongoing integration activities, the timing of completion of the merger and other changes in NOMOS' net tangible and intangible assets which occur prior to the completion of the

142



merger, as well as the receipt of the final valuation, could cause material differences in the information presented.

        The unaudited pro forma condensed combined consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" and the historical consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes of NASI incorporated by reference into this joint proxy statement/prospectus and of NOMOS included elsewhere in this joint proxy statement/prospectus, and the summary of selected historical consolidated financial data included elsewhere in this joint proxy statement/prospectus. The unaudited pro forma condensed combined consolidated financial statements are not intended to represent or be indicative of the consolidated results of operations or financial condition of NASI that would have been reported had the merger been consummated as of the dates presented and should not be taken as representative of the future consolidated results of operations or financial condition for the merged entity.

143



UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED COMBINED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET

As of January 31, 2004

(in thousands)

 
  Historical
   
   
 
 
  NASI
As of
January 31,
2004

  NOMOS
As of
December 31,
2003

  Pro Forma
Adjustments

  Pro Forma
Combined

 
 
   
   
  (Note 3)

   
 
ASSETS                          
Current assets                          
  Cash and cash equivalents   $ 2,366   $ 3,139   $   $ 5,505  
  Cash held in variable interest entity     308                 308  
  Marketable securities     26,821         (12,000 )(A)   14,821  
  Accounts receivable, net     2,073     6,730         8,803  
  Inventories     774     4,111     199   (B)   5,084  
  Prepaid expenses and other current assets     1,178     399         1,577  
   
 
 
 
 
    Total current assets     33,520     14,379     (11,801 )   36,098  

Non-current marketable securities

 

 

15,490

 

 


 

 


 

 

15,490

 
Equipment and leasehold improvements     3,020     1,525         4,545  
Non-current receivables         546     (297 )(C)   249  
Intangibles, net     857         21,100   (D)   21,957  
Goodwill     3,866         18,195   (E)   22,061  
Deferred income taxes                  
Other assets     1,756     85     (1,700 )(F)   141  
   
 
 
 
 
    Total assets   $ 58,509   $ 16,535   $ 25,497   $ 100,541  
   
 
 
 
 

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
Current liabilities                          
  Accounts payable   $ 1,036   $ 2,834       $ 3,870  
  Accrued expenses     4,850     2,085     1,000   (F)   8,327  
                  192   (G)      
                  200   (H)      
  Accrued royalties         196         196  
  Advance billings         880         880  
  Unearned revenue         3,828         3,828  
   
 
 
 
 
    Total current liabilities     5,886     9,823     1,392     17,101  
Unearned revenue—long term         1,246         1,246  
Deferred tax liabilities                  
   
 
 
 
 
    Total liabilities     5,886     11,069     1,392     18,347  
Redeemable convertible series C preferred stock           9,702     (9,702 )(I)    
Stockholders' equity                          
  Series A convertible preferred stock                    
  Series B convertible preferred stock                    
  Common stock     103         53   (J)   156  
  Deferred stock-based compensation           (353 )   353   (J)    
  Accumulated other comprehensive loss           (25 )   25   (J)    
  Paid-in capital     75,150     75,993     (33,475 )(J)   117,668  
  Accumulated deficit     (22,501 )   (79,508 )   79,508   (J)   (35,501 )
                  (13,000) (J)      
  Treasury stock     (129 )   (343 )   343   (J)   (129 )
   
 
 
 
 
    Total stockholders' equity     52,623     (4,236 )   33,807     82,194  
   
 
 
 
 
    Total liabilities and stockholders' equity   $ 58,509   $ 16,535   $ 25,497   $ 100,541  
   
 
 
 
 

See the Notes to Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Consolidated Financial Statements,
which are an integral part of these statements.

144



UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED COMBINED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS

Fiscal Year Ended October 31, 2003

(in thousands, except per share data)

 
  Historical
   
   
 
 
  NASI
Year Ended
October 31,
2003

  NOMOS
12 Months Ended
September 30,
2003

  Pro Forma
Adjustments

  Pro Forma
Combined

 
 
   
   
  (Note 3)

   
 
Revenues:                          
  Product   $ 14,683   $ 22,420   $   $ 37,103  
  Service         8,607         8,607  
   
 
 
 
 
  Net sales     14,683     31,027         45,710  

Cost of revenue

 

 

6,944

 

 

14,734

 

 


 

 

21,678

 
   
 
 
 
 
  Gross profit     7,739     16,293         24,032  

Operating expenses:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
  Selling, general and administrative     11,266     12,702     360   (K)   24,328  
  Research and development     7,351     4,831     1,625   (K)   13,807  
   
 
 
 
 
    Total operating expenses     18,617     17,533     1,985     38,135  
   
 
 
 
 
Loss from operations     (10,878 )   (1,240 )   (1,985 )   (14,103 )
Interest and other income, net     1,749     1,795     (156 )(L)   3,388  
   
 
 
 
 
Income (loss) before provision for income taxes     (9,129 )   555     (2,141 )   (10,715 )
Provision for income taxes                  
   
 
 
 
 
Income (loss) before cumulative effect of change in accounting principle   $ (9,129 ) $ 555   $ (2,141 ) $ (10,715 )
   
 
 
 
 
Basic and diluted loss per share   $ (0.89 )             $ (0.69 )
   
             
 
Shares used in basic and diluted per share calculation     10,258           5,268   (M)   15,526  
   
       
 
 

See the Notes to Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Consolidated Financial Statements, which are an integral part of these statements.

145



UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED COMBINED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS

Three Months Ended January 31, 2004

(in thousands, except per share data)

 
  Historical
   
   
 
 
  NASI
Three Months
Ended
January 31,
2004

  NOMOS
Three Months
Ended
December 31,
2003

  Pro Forma Adjustments
(Note 3)

  Pro Forma Combined
 
Revenues:                          
  Product   $ 3,363   $ 3,804   $   $ 7,167  
  Service         2,436         2,436  
   
 
 
 
 
  Net sales     3,363     6,240         9,603  

Cost of revenue

 

 

1,905

 

 

3,470

 

 


 

 

5,375

 
   
 
 
 
 
  Gross profit     1,458     2,770         4,228  

Operating expenses:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
  Selling, general and administrative     4,155     4,275     90   (K)   8,520  
  Research and development     1,444     1,281     406   (K)   3,131  
   
 
 
 
 
    Total operating expenses     5,599     5,556     496     11,651  
   
 
 
 
 
Loss from operations     (4,141 )   (2,786 )   (496 )   (7,423 )
Interest and other income, net     211     31     (39 )(L)   203  
   
 
 
 
 
Loss before provision for income taxes     (3,930 )   (2,755 )   (535 )   (7,220 )
Provision for income taxes                  
   
 
 
 
 
Loss before cumulative effect of change in accounting principle   $ (3,930 ) $ (2,755 ) $ (535 ) $ (7,220 )
   
 
 
 
 
Basic and diluted loss per share   $ (0.38 )             $ (0.46 )
   
             
 
Shares used in basic and diluted per share calculation     10,283           5,268   (M)   15,551  
   
       
 
 

See the Notes to Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Consolidated Financial Statements, which are an integral part of these statements.

146



NOTES TO UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED COMBINED

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1. Description of Transaction and Basis of Pro Forma Presentation

        On October 26, 2003, NASI and NOMOS signed an Agreement and Plan of Merger under which NOMOS will merge with and into a wholly owned subsidiary of NASI in a transaction to be accounted for as a purchase by NASI under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Under the purchase method of accounting, the assets and liabilities of NOMOS will be recorded as of the acquisition date at their fair values and added to those of NASI. The reported financial condition and results of operations of NASI after completion of the merger will reflect these values, but will not be restated retroactively to reflect the historical financial position or results of operations of NOMOS. The transaction is expected to qualify as a reorganization within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the Internal Revenue Code. If the merger is consummated, NOMOS stockholders will receive 0.891 shares of NASI common stock for each share of NOMOS common stock they hold, approximately 1.212 shares of NASI common stock for each share of NOMOS series A preferred stock they hold, 0.603 shares of NASI common stock and $2.15 per share in cash for each share of NOMOS series B preferred stock they hold and 0.340 shares of NASI common stock and $5.99 per share in cash for each share of NOMOS series C preferred stock they hold, plus in each case cash in lieu of fractional shares. Based on the terms described above and the number of shares currently outstanding, NASI plans to issue up to 5,268,097 shares of common stock and approximately $12.0 million in cash to NOMOS stockholders. In addition, each outstanding stock option exercisable for NOMOS common stock will be converted into an option to purchase common stock of NASI as of the date of the consummation of the merger. The number of shares of NASI common stock underlying each new option will equal the number of shares of NOMOS common stock for which the NOMOS stock option was exercisable prior to the merger, multiplied by 0.891. The per share exercise price of each new NASI option will be equal to the per share exercise price of the corresponding NOMOS stock option divided by 0.891 rounded up to the nearest whole cent. In addition, effective on the consummation of the merger, all outstanding unvested NOMOS stock options held by current NOMOS directors and employees will immediately vest. Each outstanding warrant to purchase shares of NOMOS common stock shall by virtue of the merger be assumed by NASI. Each warrant assumed by NASI under the merger agreement will continue to have, and be subject to, the same terms and conditions of the original warrant, except that each warrant will be exercisable for an applicable number of shares of NASI common stock equal to the number (rounding down any fractional shares) of shares of NOMOS common stock acquirable upon the exercise of the warrant multiplied by 0.891. The per share exercise price for the shares of NASI common stock issuable upon exercise of each assumed warrant will be equal to the quotient determined by dividing the exercise price per share of NOMOS common stock at which such warrant was exercisable immediately prior to the merger by 0.891, rounded up to the nearest whole cent. The merger is subject to customary closing conditions, including approval by NASI and NOMOS stockholders.

147



2. Purchase Price

        A preliminary estimate of the purchase price of NOMOS in the merger is as follows (in thousands):

Value of NASI common stock issued   $ 37,978
Assumption of NOMOS stock options and warrants(1)     4,593
Cash consideration     12,000
Estimated direct transaction costs incurred by NASI     2,700
Acquisition-related liabilities     392
   
Total estimated purchase price   $ 57,663
   

(1)
All unvested stock options held by current NOMOS directors and employees immediately vest upon the consummation of the merger.

        The fair value of the NASI shares used in determining the purchase price was $7.21 per share based on the average of the closing price of NASI common stock for the period two days before through two days after the October 27, 2003 merger agreement announcement date. The stock options and warrants were valued using a Black-Scholes valuation model with the following assumptions: risk-free interest rate of 4.5%, volatility factor of 60%, expected term of 1.5 years for stock options, contractual term of 0.5 years for warrants and no dividend yield.

        The preliminary estimated purchase price has been allocated to the acquired tangible and intangible assets and liabilities based on their estimated fair values as follows (in thousands):

Cash   $ 3,139  
Accounts receivable     6,730  
Inventories     4,310  
Equipment and leasehold improvements     1,525  
In-process research and development     13,000  
Acquired identifiable intangible assets     21,100  
Goodwill     18,195  
Other current and long term assets     733  
Assumed liabilities     (11,069 )
   
 
  Total   $ 57,663  
   
 

        The allocation of the purchase price is preliminary. The final determination of the purchase price allocation will be based on the fair values of assets acquired, including the fair values of in-process research and development, and other identifiable intangibles and the fair values of liabilities assumed as of the date that the merger is consummated. The excess of the purchase price over the fair value of assets and liabilities acquired is allocated to goodwill. The purchase price allocation will remain preliminary until NASI completes a third-party valuation of significant identifiable intangible assets acquired (including in-process research and development) and determines the fair values of other assets and liabilities acquired. The final determination of the purchase price allocation is expected to be completed as soon as practicable after consummation of the merger. The final amounts allocated to assets and liabilities acquired could differ significantly from the amounts presented in the unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial statements.

148



        The amount allocated to acquired identifiable intangible assets has been attributed to the following categories (in thousands, except useful lives):

 
  Amount
  Useful Lives
Purchased technology   $ 19,500   12
Existing customer relationships     1,100   10
Trademark     500   2
   
   
  Total   $ 21,100    
   
   

        The estimated fair value attributed to developed and core technology to be acquired in the merger, which relates to NOMOS' existing FDA-cleared products, was determined based on a discounted forecast of the estimated net future cash flows to be generated from the technology. The estimated fair value attributed to core technology to be acquired in the merger will be amortized over 12 years, which is the estimated period over which cash flows are expected to be generated from the technology.

        The amount allocated to in-process research and development represents an estimate of the fair value of purchased in-process technology for research projects that, as of the expected date of the consummation of the merger, will not have reached technological feasibility and have no alternative future use. Only those research projects that had advanced to a stage of development where management believed reasonable net future cash flow forecasts could be prepared and a reasonable likelihood of technical success existed were included in the estimated fair value. The estimated fair value of the in-process research and development to be acquired in the merger was determined based on applying a 20% discount rate to the forecast of the estimated net future cash flows for each project, adjusted for the estimated probability of technical success for each research project. In-process research and development will be expensed immediately following consummation of the merger. Ongoing in-process research and development projects are generally focused on developing enhancements and adding features and functionality that allow existing products to more effectively and efficiently treat cancers found in disease sites, such as liver and breast, for which our products, due to certain design limitations, have traditionally not been used. Strategically, this should enable the combined company to expand the market for its products rather than to simply maintain the existing revenue base. Significant investment in research and development has been, and will continue to be, necessary to enhance existing products, develop new products and to allow the combined company to generate new product sales to further penetrate and expand geographic markets for its products.

        The value assigned to purchased in-process technology comprises the following projects: BAT with optical tracking, which is expected to be released in fiscal 2004 ($4.4 million), development of a significantly enhanced treatment planning system which is expected to be released in fiscal 2005 ($3.6 million), and a treatment planning product, which is expected to be an incorporation of the enhanced technology with Monte Carlo based simulation capabilities which is expected to be released in fiscal 2006 ($4.5 million), and other smaller projects ($0.5 million). Each product development has a risk of failure or delay in introduction that could result in diminished overall cash flows should the product not be introduced to the market as currently anticipated. Continued product innovation and timely release of in-process R&D projects, once integrated and redefined as necessary, are believed to be fundamental to the success of the combined company. The amounts allocated to in-process research and development, other intangible assets and the step-up in inventories for financial reporting purposes will not result in future income tax deductions since the acquisition is expected to be a nontaxable

149



transaction. The deferred tax liabilities related to such temporary differences were offset by deferred tax assets (primarily net operating loss carryforwards subject to change in ownership provisions of Internal Revenue Service Code Section 382) in the purchase price allocation. NASI provided a full valuation allowance against the remaining net deferred tax assets since realization cannot be sufficiently assured. NASI intends to file consolidated and combined federal and state income tax returns with NOMOS following the consummation of the merger. Accordingly, no provision or benefit for income taxes were recognized in the accompanying pro forma results of operations.

        Of the total estimated purchase price, approximately $18.2 million has been allocated to goodwill. Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price of an acquired business over the fair value of the underlying net tangible and intangible assets. Goodwill is not deductible for tax purposes.

        In accordance with the Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, goodwill resulting from business combinations will not be amortized but instead will be tested for impairment at least annually (more frequently if certain indicators are present). In the event that the management of the combined company determines that the goodwill has become impaired, the combined company will incur an accounting charge for the amount of impairment during the fiscal quarter in which the determination is made.

3. Pro Forma Adjustments

        The pro forma adjustments included in the unaudited pro forma condensed combined consolidated financial statements are as follows:

        (A)  To record the estimated cash consideration to be paid to NOMOS stockholders in the merger.

        (B)  To record the estimated step-up of NOMOS' inventory from book value to fair value. The fair value step-up of inventory will result in a $199,000 decrease in gross margin as the inventory is sold following consummation of the merger. This impact has not been reflected in the pro forma condensed combined consolidated statements of operations because it does not have a significant continuing impact on the business.

        (C)  To record forgiveness of debt associated with the note receivable of $297,000 from John A. Friede, chairman of the board of directors of NOMOS, immediately prior to the consummation of the merger.

        (D)  To record the estimated fair values of acquired identifiable intangible assets arising from the merger.

        (E)  To reflect the preliminary estimate of the fair value of goodwill.

        (F)  To reflect $2.7 million of estimated direct NASI transaction costs such as financial advisor, legal and accounting fees of which $1.7 million is included in NASI other assets as of January 31, 2004 and to accrue the remaining $1.0 million; transaction costs such as financial advisor, legal and accounting fees estimated to be $2.0 million incurred by NOMOS will be expensed as incurred.

        (G)  To accrue for severance of $192,000 due John A. Friede for his employment termination upon the consummation of the merger.

        (H)  To record $200,422 payment to NOMOS series C preferred stockholders in connection with the standstill agreement (to be paid by NOMOS upon consummation of the merger).

150



        (I)   To eliminate NOMOS' historical convertible series C preferred stock and dividends on the preferred stock to reflect the treatment of such stock upon the consummation of the merger.

        (J)   Adjustments to stockholders' equity (in thousands):

 
  As of January 31, 2004
 
To record the estimated value of NASI common stock, warrants and stock options to be issued in the merger(1)   $ 42,571  
To record the preliminary estimate of the fair value of in-process research and development(2)     (13,000 )
To eliminate NOMOS' historical stockholders' equity components, net     4,236  
   
 
    $ 33,807  
   
 

        (K)  To reflect the amortization of acquired identifiable intangible assets.

        (L)  To eliminate the estimated interest income on cash balances assuming the distribution of the cash consideration at the time of the merger.

        (M) To reflect the issuance of NASI shares in the merger. The issuance of NASI stock options in exchange for NOMOS stock options was excluded as such options were anti-dilutive.

4. Forward-Looking Statements

        The statements contained in this section may be deemed to be forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 21E of the Exchange Act and Section 27A of the Securities Act. Forward-looking statements are typically identified by the words "believe," "expect," "anticipate," "intend," "estimate" and similar expressions. These forward-looking statements are based largely on management's expectations and are subject to a number of uncertainties. Actual results could differ materially from these forward-looking statements. Neither NASI nor NOMOS undertake any obligation to update publicly or revise any forward-looking statements. For a more complete discussion of the risks and uncertainties which may affect such forward-looking statements, please refer to the section entitled "Cautionary Statement Concerning Forward-Looking Statements".

151



INFORMATION ABOUT THE SPECIAL MEETINGS AND VOTING

The NASI Special Meeting

        NASI's board of directors is using this joint proxy statement/prospectus to solicit proxies from the holders of NASI common stock for use at the special meeting of NASI stockholders. NASI is first mailing this joint proxy statement/prospectus and accompanying form of proxy to NASI stockholders on or about March     , 2004.

When and Where the NASI Special Meeting Will Be Held

        NASI's special meeting will be held at the Warner Center Marriott Hotel, 21850 Oxnard Street, Woodland Hills, California 91367, on Monday, May 3, 2004 starting at 10:00 a.m., local time.

What Will Be Voted Upon

        At the NASI special meeting, NASI stockholders will be asked to consider and vote on the following items:

        NASI's board of directors unanimously recommends that NASI stockholders vote FOR each of these proposals. Detailed descriptions of each of these proposals is set forth below:

Proposal to Approve the Merger Agreement, the Proposed Merger, to Issue Shares of NASI Common Stock in the Merger and the other Transactions Contemplated by the Merger Agreement

        At the special meeting, NASI stockholders will be asked to approve the merger agreement, the proposed merger, the issuance of up to approximately 7,440,332 shares of NASI common stock of which up to approximately 5,268,097 shares are currently expected to be issued to holders of NOMOS common stock and preferred stock in exchange for such holders' shares of NOMOS stock. Stockholder approval of merger agreement, the proposed merger, the issuance of these shares and the other transactions contemplated by the merger agreement is a condition to the consummation of the merger, which cannot be waived by the parties. Approval of the proposal to approve the merger agreement, the proposed merger, the issuance of these shares and the other transactions contemplated by the merger agreement requires the affirmative vote of at least a majority of the stock having voting power present, in person or by proxy, at the special meeting so long as a quorum is present in person or by proxy at the special meeting.

Proposal to Approve the Amendment to the Amended and Restated 1996 Stock Option Plan to Permit the Issuance of Replacement Options in Connection with a Merger or Consolidation

        At the special meeting, NASI stockholders will be asked to approve an amendment to the Amended and Restated 1996 Stock Option Plan to allow for the grant of replacement options to the

152



holders of NOMOS' stock options. The amendment provides that (i) the committee administering the plan may grant options under the plan in substitution for stock options held by employees, directors or other option holders of another corporation in connection with a merger or consolidation of such corporation with NASI and (ii) any substitute stock options granted under these circumstances shall not count against the total number of shares that may be issued under the plan. Stockholder approval of the amendment to the Amended and Restated 1996 Stock Option Plan to permit the issuance of replacement options in connection with a merger or consolidation is a condition to the consummation of the merger. The amendment would become effective upon stockholder approval. Approval of the proposal to approve the amendment to the Amended and Restated 1996 Stock Option Plan to permit the issuance of replacement options in connection with a merger or consolidation requires the affirmative vote of at least a majority of the stock having voting power present, in person or by proxy, at the special meeting so long as a quorum is present in person or by proxy at the special meeting.

        If adopted, the amendment would change the second, third, fourth and fifth sentences of Section 2 of the 1996 Stock Option Plan to read as follows:

        The text of the entire plan, as amended, is available free of charge by requesting a copy of the plan in writing or by telephone from the secretary of NASI at 20200 Sunburst Street, Chatsworth, California 91311, (818) 734-8600.

Proposal to Approve the Amendment to the Amended and Restated 1996 Stock Option Plan to increase the maximum number of shares available for Issuance Under the Plan from 4,000,000 to 4,600,000 shares

        At the special meeting, NASI stockholders will be asked to approve an amendment to the Amended and Restated 1996 Stock Option Plan to increase the aggregate number of shares of NASI's common stock which may be issued under the plan from 4,000,000 to 4,600,000 shares. Additional shares are needed for future stock option grants in order for NASI to make grants during 2004 that would be commensurate with stock option grants made to its current employees. The importance of the availability of additional shares is heightened by the anticipated increase in the size of NASI's employee base as a result of the merger. Availability of an adequate number of shares for stock option grants is important to NASI to be able to continue to adequately incentivize its employee work force for retention and performance purposes.

        If this proposal is not approved the proposed merger can still be consummated. If approved, this proposal will still be effective even if the proposed merger is not consummated. The amendment would become effective upon stockholder approval. Approval of the proposal to approve this amendment requires the affirmative vote of at least a majority of the stock having voting power present, in person

153



or by proxy, at the special meeting so long as a quorum is present in person or by proxy at the special meeting.

        If adopted, the amendment would change the first sentence of Section 2 of the Amended and Restated 1996 Stock Option Plan to read as follows:

        The text of the entire plan, as amended, is available free of charge by requesting a copy of the plan in writing or by telephone from the secretary of NASI at 20200 Sunburst Street, Chatsworth, California 91311, (818) 734-8600.

Proposal to Adjourn the Special Meeting

        At the special meeting, NASI stockholders may be asked to approve a proposal to adjourn the special meeting to a later date, if necessary, to solicit additional proxies if there are not sufficient votes in favor of the proposals to be voted on at the special meeting. Stockholder approval of the proposal to adjourn the special meeting would require the affirmative vote of at least a majority of the stock having voting power present, in person or by proxy, at the special meeting so long as a quorum is present in person or by proxy at the special meeting.

Record Date and Stockholders Entitled to Vote

        NASI stockholders who hold their shares of record as of the close of business on March 10, 2004 are entitled to notice of and to vote at NASI's special meeting. On the record date, there were 10,353,807 shares of NASI common stock outstanding and entitled to vote at the special meeting, held by [    ] holders of record.

        Each share of NASI common stock is entitled to one vote. Shares held by NASI in its treasury are not voted. As of the NASI record date, NASI's directors and executive officers beneficially owned and were entitled to vote 1,858,472 shares of NASI common stock, which represents 11.2% of NASI's outstanding common stock.

Quorum Requirement

        A quorum of NASI stockholders is necessary to hold a valid meeting. The presence in person or by proxy at the meeting of holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of NASI common stock entitled to vote at the meeting is a quorum. Abstentions and broker non-votes count as present for establishing a quorum. A broker non-vote occurs on an item when a broker is not permitted to vote on that item without instruction from the beneficial owner of the shares and no instruction is given.

Voting Your Shares and Changing Your Vote

        Voting Your Shares.    You may vote by submitting a proxy or voting in person at the special meeting by ballot. You may also vote by mail, if you do not attend the special meeting.

        If you plan to attend the special meeting and wish to vote in person, you will be given a ballot at the meeting. Please note, however, that if you are not the record holder of your shares and you wish to vote in person at the special meeting, you must bring to the meeting a proxy from the record holder of the shares authorizing you to vote at the meeting.

        If your shares are registered in your name, you are encouraged to vote by proxy even if you plan to attend the special meeting in person. Voting instructions are included on your proxy card. If you properly complete the proxy card, sign, date and return it in the enclosed envelope in time to vote, one of the individuals named as your proxy will vote your shares as you have directed.

154



        If your shares are held in the name of a bank, broker or other fiduciary, you must provide the record holder with instructions on how to vote your shares. Please follow the instructions on the voting instruction card furnished by the record holder, which may include options to submit your vote by mail.

        Changing Your Vote.    If your shares are registered in your name, you may revoke your proxy at any time before the meeting. You may revoke your proxy by (i) timely delivering by mail a valid, subsequently dated proxy, (ii) delivering notice in writing to the secretary of NASI or (iii) submitting a vote by ballot at the special meeting. You may change your vote by voting in person at the meeting and by requesting revocation of your proxy. Attending the special meeting in person will not revoke a previously submitted proxy unless you request that such action be taken.

        If your shares are not registered in your name, you may change your vote by timely submitting a new voting instruction card.

How Proxies Are Counted

        If you return a signed and dated proxy card but fail to indicate how the shares are to be voted, those shares represented by your proxy card will be voted for approval of all of the proposals identified on the proxy card. A valid proxy also gives the individuals named as proxies authority to vote in their discretion when voting the shares on any other matters that are properly presented for action at the NASI special meeting. A properly executed proxy marked "ABSTAIN" will not be voted; however, it will be counted to determine whether there is a quorum present at the special meeting and it will count as voting power present at the meeting. A proxy marked "ABSTAIN" will have the same effect as a vote against all proposals to be voted upon at the NASI special meeting. Brokers cannot vote the shares that they hold beneficially either for or against any of the proposals without specific instructions from the person who beneficially owns those shares.

        Broker non-votes (i.e., shares held by brokers which are represented at a meeting but with respect to which the broker is not empowered to vote on a particular proposal) will be counted for purposes of determining whether there is a quorum at the NASI special meeting. Broker non-votes will have no effect on the outcome of the proposals.

Other Business; Adjournments

        We are not currently aware of any other business to be acted upon at the special meeting. If, however, other matters are properly brought before the special meeting, or any adjournment thereof, your proxies include discretionary authority on the part of the individuals appointed to vote your shares or act on those matters according to their best judgment.

        Adjournments may be made for the purpose of, among other things, soliciting additional proxies. Any adjournment may be made from time to time by approval of the holders of shares representing a majority of the votes present in person or by proxy at the meeting, as long as a quorum is present in person or by proxy at the special meeting, without further notice other than by an announcement made at the meeting. If a quorum is not present or represented by proxy at the special meeting, the stockholders entitled to vote have the power to adjourn the meeting.

NASI Stockholder Account Maintenance

        NASI's transfer agent is U.S. Stock Transfer Corporation. All communications concerning accounts of NASI stockholders of record, including address changes, name changes, inquiries as to requirements to transfer shares of common stock and similar issues can be handled by calling the U.S. Stock Transfer Corporation at (818) 502-1404 or by contacting U.S. Stock Transfer's web site at www.usstock.com.

        For other information about NASI, stockholders can visit NASI's website at www.NASI.net. Information on NASI's website is not incorporated by reference herein.

155



Cost of Solicitation

        Under the terms of the merger agreement, NASI and NOMOS will share equally the cost of filing, printing and mailing this joint proxy statement/prospectus. In addition to this mailing, proxies may be solicited by directors, officers or employees of NASI in person or by telephone or electronic transmission. None of these directors, officers or employees will be directly compensated for such services. NASI has retained Georgeson Shareholder Communications Inc. to aid in the solicitation of proxies for an estimated fee of $10,000, plus fees and expenses.

        The extent to which these proxy soliciting efforts will be necessary depends entirely upon how promptly proxies are submitted. You should submit your proxy without delay. We also reimburse brokers and other nominees for their expenses in sending these materials to you and getting your voting instructions.

The NOMOS Special Meeting

        NOMOS' board of directors is using this joint proxy statement/prospectus to solicit proxies from the holders of NOMOS common stock, series A preferred stock, series B preferred stock and series C preferred stock for use at the special meeting of NOMOS stockholders. NOMOS is first mailing this joint proxy statement/prospectus and accompanying form of proxy to NOMOS stockholders on or about March     , 2004.

When and Where the NOMOS Special Meeting Will Be Held

        NOMOS' special meeting will be held at the offices of Cohen & Grigsby, P.C. located at 11 Stanwix Street, 15th Floor, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15222 on Monday, May 3, 2004, starting at 10:00 a.m., local time.

What Will Be Voted Upon

        At the NOMOS special meeting, NOMOS stockholders will be asked to consider and vote on the following items:

        NOMOS' board of directors unanimously recommends that the NOMOS stockholders vote "FOR" each of these proposals. Detailed descriptions of each of these proposals is set forth below:

Proposal to Approve the Merger Agreement, the Proposed Merger and the other Transactions Contemplated by the Merger Agreement

        At the special meeting, the NOMOS stockholders will be asked to approve the merger agreement, the proposed merger and the other transactions contemplated by the merger agreement. Stockholder approval of the merger agreement the proposed merger and the other transactions contemplated by the merger agreement is a condition to both NOMOS' and NASI's obligation to consummate the merger, which condition may not be waived by the parties. For a detailed discussion of the reasons for, background of, and effect of the merger and the merger agreement, see "The Proposed Merger" and "The Merger Agreement".

        Approval of the merger agreement, the proposed merger and the other transactions contemplated by the merger agreement requires the affirmative vote of a least a majority of the outstanding shares of

156



NOMOS' common stock, series A preferred stock, series B preferred stock and series C preferred stock, voting together as a single class on an as-converted-to-common stock basis.

        NOMOS stockholders are entitled under the Delaware General Corporation Law to exercise appraisal rights in connection with the merger if they do not vote in favor of the merger agreement, the proposed merger and the other transactions contemplated by the merger agreement and if they take certain other steps to perfect such appraisal rights. This joint proxy statement/prospectus serves as notice of rights of appraisal pursuant to Section 262 of the Delaware General Corporation Law. For more information, see "The Proposed Merger—Dissenters' Appraisal Rights". It is a condition to NASI's obligation to consummate the merger, however, that such appraisal rights shall not have been exercised with respect to more than 5% of the outstanding shares of NOMOS' common stock.

Proposal to Adjourn the Special Meeting

        At the special meeting, the NOMOS stockholders will be asked to approve a proposal to adjourn the special meeting to a later date, if necessary, to solicit additional proxies if there are insufficient votes in favor of the proposal to be voted on at the special meeting. Stockholder approval of any proposal to adjourn the special meeting requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares of common stock, series A preferred stock, series B preferred stock and series C preferred stock present in person or represented by proxy at the special meeting, voting together as a single class on an as-converted-to-common stock basis.

Record Date and Stockholders Entitled to Vote

        NOMOS stockholders who hold their shares of record as of the close of business on March 10, 2004 are entitled to notice of and to vote at NOMOS' special meeting. On the record date, there were 3,632,777 shares of NOMOS' common stock outstanding, 374,748 shares of NOMOS' series A preferred stock outstanding, 1,861,908 shares of NOMOS' series B preferred stock outstanding and 1,336,152 shares of NOMOS' series C preferred stock outstanding, collectively held by 284 holders of record.

        Each share of NOMOS' common stock, series B preferred stock and series C preferred stock is entitled to one vote at the special meeting. Each share of NOMOS' series A preferred stock is entitled to approximately 1.3605 votes at the special meeting. Shares held by NOMOS in its treasury will not be voted.

        As of the NOMOS record date, NOMOS' directors and executive officers and their affiliates beneficially owned and were entitled to vote 4,191,770 shares of NOMOS' common stock on an as-converted-to-common stock basis.

Quorum Requirement

        A quorum of NOMOS stockholders is necessary to hold a valid meeting. The presence, in person or by proxy at the special meeting, of the holders of a majority of the issued and outstanding shares of NOMOS' common stock, series A preferred stock, series B preferred stock and series C preferred stock, on an as-converted-to-common stock basis, shall be necessary in order to constitute a quorum for the transaction of business.

Voting Agreements

        John A. Friede, NOMOS' chairman of the board and largest stockholder, has entered into a voting agreement pursuant to which he has agreed to vote approximately 41% of the shares of NOMOS stock beneficially owned or subsequently acquired by him in favor of the approval of the merger agreement, the proposed merger and the other transactions contemplated by the merger agreement. As of the record date, Mr. Friede beneficially owned approximately 42% of the outstanding common stock and

157



preferred stock on an as-converted-to-common stock basis, approximately 11% of NOMOS' outstanding shares of series A preferred stock, approximately 80% of NOMOS' outstanding shares of series B preferred stock and none of NOMOS' outstanding shares of series C preferred stock. For more information, see "Related Agreements—Voting Agreement; Irrevocable Proxies and Voting Trust".

Voting Your Shares and Changing Your Vote

        Voting Your Shares.    You may vote by submitting a proxy or voting in person at the special meeting by ballot. If you do not vote in person at the special meeting by ballot or by submitting a proxy, it will have the same effect as voting to reject the merger agreement, the proposed merger and the other transactions contemplated by the merger agreement but will have no effect on the outcome of the other proposals presented at the NOMOS special meeting.

        If you plan to attend the special meeting and wish to vote in person, you will be given a ballot at the meeting. Please note, however, that if you are not the record holder of your shares and you wish to vote in person at the special meeting, you must bring to the meeting a proxy from the record holder of the shares authorizing you to vote at the meeting.

        If your shares are registered in your name, you are encouraged to vote by proxy even if you plan to attend the special meeting in person. Voting instructions are included on your proxy card. If you properly complete the proxy card, sign, date and return it in the enclosed envelope, one of the individuals named as your proxy will vote your shares as you have directed.

        If your shares are held in the name of a bank, broker or other fiduciary, you must provide the record holder with instructions on how to vote your shares. Please follow the instructions on the voting instruction card furnished by the record holder.

        Changing Your Vote.    If your shares are registered in your name, you may revoke your proxy at any time before the meeting. You may revoke your proxy by (i) timely delivering by mail a valid, subsequently dated proxy, (ii) delivering notice in writing to the Secretary of NOMOS, or (iii) submitting a vote by ballot at the special meeting. Attending the special meeting in person will not revoke a previously submitted proxy unless you request that such action be taken.

        If your shares are not registered in your name, you may change your vote by timely submitting a new voting instruction card to the record holder of your shares.

How Proxies Are Counted

        If you return a signed and dated proxy card but fail to indicate how the shares are to be voted, those shares represented by your proxy card will be voted for approval of all of the proposals identified on the proxy card. A valid proxy also gives the individuals named as proxies authority to vote in their discretion when voting the shares on any other matters that are properly presented for action at the NOMOS special meeting. A properly executed proxy marked "ABSTAIN" will not be voted; however, it will be counted to determine whether there is a quorum present at the special meeting and it will count as voting power present at the meeting. A proxy marked "ABSTAIN" will have the same effect as a vote against each of the proposals to be voted upon at the NOMOS meeting. Broker non-votes (i.e., shares held by brokers which are represented at a meeting but with respect to which the broker is not empowered to vote on a particular proposal) will be counted for purposes of determining whether there is a quorum at the NOMOS special meeting. Broker non-votes will have the effect of voting to reject the merger agreement, but will have no effect on the outcome of the other proposals presented at the NOMOS special meeting.

Other Business; Adjournments

        NOMOS is not currently aware of any other business to be acted upon at the special meeting. If, however, other matters are properly brought before the NOMOS special meeting, or any adjournment

158



thereof, your proxies include discretionary authority on the part of the individuals appointed to vote your shares or act on those matters according to their best judgment.

        Adjournments may be made for the purpose of, among other things, soliciting additional proxies. Any adjournment may be made from time to time by approval of the holders of shares representing a majority of the votes present in person or by proxy at the meeting, as long as a quorum is present in person or by proxy at the special meeting, without further notice other than by an announcement made at the meeting. If a quorum is not present or represented by proxy at the special meeting, the stockholders entitled to vote have the power to adjourn the meeting.

Costs of Solicitation

        NOMOS and NASI will share equally all fees and expenses, other than accountant's and attorneys' fee, incurred with respect to the printing and filing of this joint proxy statement/prospectus, and any amendments or supplements hereto. In addition to this mailing, proxies may be solicited by directors, officers or employees of NOMOS in person or by telephone or electronic transmission. None of such directors, officers or employees will be directly compensated for such services.

        The extent to which these proxy soliciting efforts will be necessary depends entirely upon how promptly proxies are submitted. You should submit your proxy without delay.

Stockholder Proposals

        NOMOS' bylaws effectively limit the business that may be transacted at a special meeting of stockholders to matters relating to the purposes of the meeting stated in the notice of the meeting. Accordingly, NOMOS stockholders may not submit other proposals for consideration at the special meeting. NOMOS will hold an annual meeting of its stockholders in the year 2004 only if the merger has not already been consummated.

Recommendation of the Board of Directors

        After careful consideration, NOMOS' board of directors has unanimously approved the merger agreement, the proposed merger and the other transactions contemplated by the merger agreement. NOMOS' board of directors has determined the merger is consistent with, and in furtherance of, NOMOS' long-term business strategy and that the merger is fair to, advisable and in the best interests of NOMOS and its stockholders. Accordingly, NOMOS' board of directors unanimously recommends that the NOMOS stockholders vote "FOR" the approval of the merger agreement, the proposed merger and the other transactions contemplated by the merger agreement and "FOR" the adjournment proposal. For more information on this recommendation, see "The Proposed Merger—Reasons of NOMOS Board of Directors for the Merger".

159



COMPARISON OF STOCKHOLDER RIGHTS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE MATTERS

        NASI is a Delaware corporation subject to the provisions of the Delaware General Corporation Law, or DGCL. NOMOS is also a Delaware corporation subject to the provisions of the DGCL. Upon completion of the merger, NOMOS stockholders, whose rights are currently governed by NOMOS' certificate of incorporation and bylaws and the DGCL, will become stockholders of NASI and their rights will be governed by NASI's certificate of incorporation and bylaws and the DGCL.

        The following description summarizes material differences between the rights of holders of NASI common stock and the rights of holders of NOMOS common stock. This summary is not intended to be a complete discussion of all those differences or a complete description of the specific provisions referred to in this summary, and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the DGCL and the various documents of NASI and NOMOS that we refer to in this summary. The identification of specific differences is not intended to indicate that other equally or more significant differences do not exist. For additional information regarding the specific rights of holders of NASI capital stock, you should read the section of this proxy statement/prospectus entitled "Description of NASI Capital Stock". You should read carefully the relevant provisions of the DGCL, the certificate of incorporation and bylaws of NASI which are incorporated by reference into this joint proxy statement/prospectus. You may obtain copies of the certificate of incorporation and bylaws of NOMOS by contacting NOMOS. We refer you to "Where You Can Find More Information" section of this joint proxy statement/prospectus.

        NOMOS' board of directors and stockholders have approved an amended and restated certificate of incorporation of NOMOS to be filed and to become effective immediately prior to the consummation of the merger (herein, the "Amended NOMOS Certificate"). The Amended NOMOS Certificate would confirm that, upon the effectiveness of the merger, the holders of NOMOS' common stock and each series of preferred stock will be entitled to receive, and will only be entitled to receive, the merger consideration and other treatment provided for under the merger agreement. For more information, see "The Merger Agreement—Amendment of NOMOS Certificate of Incorporation". Unless otherwise indicated below, the description of the rights of NOMOS stockholders applies with respect to both NOMOS' current certificate of incorporation and the Amended NOMOS Certificate.

 
  Rights of NASI stockholders
  Rights of NOMOS stockholders
Class of Common Stock   NASI has only one class of common stock outstanding. Holders of NASI common stock are entitled to all of the rights and obligations provided to common stockholders under its certificate of incorporation and bylaws and under Delaware law.   NOMOS has only one class of common stock outstanding. Holders of NOMOS common stock and preferred stock are entitled to all of the rights and obligations provided to common stockholders under its articles of organization and bylaws and under Delaware law. The NOMOS common stock has no redemption, preemptive, conversion or subscription rights.

Classes of Preferred Stock

 

NASI has no shares of preferred stock outstanding and NASI has no present plans to issue any shares of preferred stock.

 

NOMOS has three classes of preferred stock outstanding, series A preferred stock, series B preferred stock and series C preferred stock, each of which are convertible into shares of NOMOS common stock at the option of the holder and automatically upon the occurrence of certain events set forth in NOMOS' certificate of incorporation.
         

160



 

 

 

 

As of the date of this joint proxy statement/prospectus, each series of NOMOS preferred stock is convertible into NOMOS common stock at the following rates (subject to adjustment for certain broad based anti-dilution rights and stock dividends, stock splits and similar actions):

 

 

 

 

(i) each share of series A preferred stock is convertible into approximately 1.3605 shares of NOMOS common stock;

 

 

 

 

(ii) each share of series B preferred stock is convertible into 1 share of NOMOS common stock; and

 

 

 

 

(iii) each share of series C preferred stock is convertible into 1 share of NOMOS common stock.

Anti-Dilution Rights

 

 

 

Under NOMOS' certificate of incorporation, each of NOMOS' series of preferred stock is entitled to certain "anti-dilution" rights, which are designed to protect the holders of such stock from the issuances of shares of NOMOS common stock, or of shares convertible into or exercisable for common stock, at a price below the then applicable "conversion price" of such preferred stock. As of the date of this joint proxy statement/prospectus, the conversion price of the series A preferred stock is $14.48 per share, the conversion price of the series B preferred stock is $9.85 per share, and the conversion price of series C preferred stock is $3.518 per share.

 

 

 

 

The conversion price of NOMOS' various series of preferred stock is used to determine the number of shares of common stock into which a share of such preferred stock is convertible, which in turn, affects the number of votes to which the holder of each share of preferred stock is entitled. More specifically, the number of shares of common stock into which a share of a particular series of preferred stock is convertible is determined by dividing (i) a specified dollar amount (herein, the "Numerator"), which is derived from the initial issuance price of such share of preferred stock by (ii) the then applicable conversion price. Currently, the Numerator is $19.70 per share of series A preferred stock, $9.85 per share of series B preferred stock, and $3.518 per share of series C preferred stock. By dividing the applicable Numerator by the applicable conversion price, one can determine that:

 

 

 

 

• each share of series A preferred stock is convertible into approximately 1.3605 shares of common stock;

 

 

 

 

• each share of series B preferred stock is convertible into one share of common stock; and

 

 

 

 

• each share of series C preferred stock is convertible into one share of common stock.
         

161



 

 

 

 

The applicable conversion price for each of NOMOS' series of preferred stock is adjustable downward on a so-called "weighted-average" basis, in the event that NOMOS issues shares of common stock, or securities convertible into, or exercisable for common stock at a price (including amounts paid upon exercise or conversion) that is less than the applicable conversion price. The effect of any downward adjustment in the conversion price is to increase the number of shares of common stock acquirable upon conversion of the preferred stock. There are several exceptions to these anti-dilution adjustments, including exceptions for shares issued upon conversion of the outstanding preferred stock, shares issued in connection with certain stock options, warrants and other incentive grants, and other exceptions.

 

 

 

 

Anti-dilution adjustments may also be triggered in the event of certain mergers of NOMOS with or into another corporation. However, under the Amended NOMOS Certificate, no such adjustment will be made as a result of a merger of NOMOS with or into any other company, if such merger constitutes a "qualified merger," as such term is defined in the NOMOS certificate of incorporation. The merger with NASI would constitute a qualified merger.

 

 

 

 

The foregoing is only a summary of the anti-dilution rights. The details and precise mechanics of the anti-dilution rights are beyond the scope of this summary discussion, and you are encouraged to read NOMOS' certificate of incorporation to more information.

Corporate Governance

 

The rights of NASI stockholders are governed by Delaware law and under NASI's certificate of incorporation and bylaws. Upon completion of the merger, the rights of NASI stockholders will continue to be governed by Delaware law and NASI's certificate of incorporation and bylaws.

 

The rights of NOMOS stockholders are governed by Delaware law and under NOMOS' certificate of incorporation and bylaws. Upon completion of the merger, the rights of NOMOS stockholders will continue to be governed by Delaware law, but under NASI's certificate of incorporation and bylaws.

Authorized Capital Stock

 

The authorized capital stock of NASI consists of 40,000,000 shares of common stock, $0.01 par value per share, and 2,000,000 shares of preferred stock, $0.01 par value per share.

 

The authorized capital stock of NOMOS consists of 25,000,000 shares of common stock, $0.0001 par value per share and 8,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value $0.0001 per share (of which 1,000,000 have been designated as series A preferred stock, 4,000,000 have been designated as series B preferred stock and 3,000,000 have been designated as series C preferred stock).
         

162



Board of Directors Authority to Designate Rights and Issue Undesignated Preferred Stock

 

NASI's certificate of incorporation authorizes its board of directors to issue, without stockholder approval, undesignated shares of preferred stock in one or more series, and to determine the rights, preferences, privileges and restrictions of any such series, including dividend rights, conversion rights, voting rights, rights and terms of redemption, redemption price or liquidation preferences and the number of shares constituting any such class or series and the designation of such class or series.

 

NOMOS' certificate of incorporation does not grant its board of directors the authority to determine the rights, preferences, privileges and restrictions of any undesignated preferred stock. NOMOS does not currently have any undesignated preferred stock authorized for issuance under its certificate of incorporation.

Dividends and Stock Repurchases

 

Under the DGCL, a corporation may pay dividends out of surplus, or, if there is no surplus, out of net profits for the current or preceding fiscal year in which the dividend is declared, provided that the amount of capital of the corporation following the declaration and payment of the dividend is not less than the aggregate amount of the capital represented by the issued and outstanding stock of all classes having a preference upon the distribution of assets. In addition, Delaware law generally provides that a corporation may redeem or repurchase its shares only if the redemption or repurchase would not impair the capital of the corporation. A Delaware corporation may redeem or repurchase shares having a preference, or if no shares entitled to such a preference are outstanding, any of its shares, upon the distribution of any of its assets if such shares will be retired upon acquisition, and provided that, after the reduction in capital made in connection with such retirement of shares, the corporation's remaining assets are sufficient to pay any debts not otherwise provided for.

 

Under the DGCL, a corporation may pay dividends out of surplus, or, if there is no surplus, out of net profits for the current or preceding fiscal year in which the dividend is declared, provided that the amount of capital of the corporation following the declaration and payment of the dividend is not less than the aggregate amount of the capital represented by the issued and outstanding stock of all classes having a preference upon the distribution of assets. In addition, Delaware law generally provides that a corporation may redeem or repurchase its shares only if the redemption or repurchase would not impair the capital of the corporation. A Delaware corporation may redeem or repurchase shares having a preference, or if no shares entitled to such a preference are outstanding, any of its shares, upon the distribution of any of its assets if such shares will be retired upon acquisition, and provided that, after the reduction in capital made in connection with such retirement of shares, the corporation's remaining assets are sufficient to pay any debts not otherwise provided for.

 

 

 

 

Pursuant to NOMOS' certificate of incorporation:

 

 

 

 

(i) the holders of NOMOS series A preferred stock and series B preferred stock are not entitled to share in any dividends declared or paid by NOMOS, however, NOMOS may not pay any dividends (other than a dividend payable in shares of its common stock) or make any distributions of cash or property with respect to any shares of its common stock unless such dividends or distributions are also made to the holders of series A and series B preferred stock on an as-converted-to-common stock basis;
         

163



 

 

 

 

(ii) the holders of NOMOS series C preferred stock are entitled to receive dividends on an as-converted-to-common stock basis with shares of NOMOS common stock, when, as, and if declared by NOMOS' board of directors; in addition, the holders of NOMOS series C preferred stock are entitled to receive, prior and in preference to any dividends paid on NOMOS' common stock, series A preferred stock or series B preferred stock, a cumulative dividend at the compound rate of 10% per share per annum of the stated value thereof, which stated value is $3.518 (subject to adjustment as provided in NOMOS' certificate of incorporation).

 

 

 

 

NOMOS has never paid cash dividends on its common stock or preferred stock.

 

 

 

 

See also "Redemption and Exchange Features" below.

Voting Rights

 

The outstanding voting securities of NASI consist of the shares of NASI common stock. Each holder of NASI common stock is entitled to one vote per share.

 

The outstanding voting securities of NOMOS consist of the shares of NOMOS common stock, series A preferred stock, series B preferred stock and series C preferred stock. Except where required by the DGCL, NOMOS' certificate of incorporation or bylaws, NOMOS' common stock, series A preferred stock, series B preferred stock, and series C preferred stock vote together as one class on an as-converted-to-common stock bases. Each holder of NOMOS common stock is entitled to one vote per share.

 

 

 

 

Each holder of NOMOS series A preferred stock, series B preferred stock and series C preferred stock is entitled to the same number of votes as the number of shares of NOMOS common stock (rounded up to the nearest whole number in the case of the series C preferred stock) into which such holder's preferred stock could be converted. As of the date of this joint proxy statement/prospectus, each share of series B preferred stock and each share of C preferred stock is convertible into one share of common stock, and each share of series A preferred stock is convertible into approximately 1.3605 shares of common stock.

 

 

 

 

NOMOS' certificate of incorporation requires the vote of a majority (or, in the case of the series C preferred stock, at least 75%) of the outstanding shares of each series of NOMOS preferred stock voting as a separate class before NOMOS may take any of the following actions:

 

 

 

 

• Create, authorize or issue any shares of any class or series of stock ranking prior to a series of NOMOS preferred stock as to dividends or upon liquidation or otherwise

 

 

 

 

• Amend, alter or repeal any of the provisions of NOMOS' certificate of incorporation or bylaws so as to adversely affect in any manner any of the preferences, rights, powers or privileges of a series of NOMOS preferred stock
         

164



 

 

 

 

• Declare or pay any dividends or make any distributions with respect to NOMOS common stock unless such dividends or distributions are also made with respect to the NOMOS series A preferred stock and series B preferred on an as converted basis

 

 

 

 

• Take any other action as to which the DGCL requires the vote of consent of at least a majority of each affected class of NOMOS' stock voting or consenting as a separate class

 

 

 

 

In addition, NOMOS' certificate of incorporation requires the vote of least 75% of the outstanding shares of NOMOS series C preferred stock voting as a separate class before NOMOS may take any of the following actions:

 

 

 

 

• Apply any of NOMOS' assets to the redemption or acquisition of NOMOS common stock, series A preferred stock or series B preferred stock, or

 

 

 

 

• Enter into any transactions which would result in the outstanding principal amount of indebtedness for borrowed funds of NOMOS to exceed $3,000,000.

Cumulative Voting for Election of Directors

 

Neither NASI's certificate of incorporation or bylaws provides for cumulative voting in the election of directors, which means that the holders of a majority of the shares voted can elect all of the directors then outstanding for election.

 

Neither NOMOS' certificate of incorporation or bylaws provides for cumulative voting in the election of directors, which means that the holders of a majority of the shares voted can elect all of the directors then outstanding for election.

Redemption and Exchange Features

 

NASI common stock is not redeemable.

 

None of NOMOS common stock, series A preferred stock or series B preferred stock is redeemable. The holders of at least 50% of the outstanding NOMOS series C preferred stock may require NOMOS to redeem such shares of NOMOS series C preferred stock of such electing holders at a redemption price of $6.50 per share, plus all dividends accrued or declared but unpaid on each such shares on the redemption date (subject to adjustments as provided in NOMOS' certificate of incorporation) at any time after the earlier to occur of (i) March 2, 2004 (or, under the Amended NOMOS Certificate, March 2, 2008) or (ii) the effective date of a consolidation or merger of NOMOS with or into any other company that constitutes a disposition of the entire corporation or a sale of all or substantially all of the assets of NOMOS. In addition, NOMOS may redeem all, but not less than all, of the outstanding series C preferred stock at a redemption price equal to $7.74 per share, plus all dividends accrued or declared but unpaid on each such shares on the redemption date, during the 90-day period immediately following March 2, 2004.
         

165



 

 

 

 

Under NOMOS' amended and restated certificate of incorporation, which is to become effective immediately prior to the consummation of the merger, the holders of series C stock will no longer be able cause a redemption of such stock as a result of a merger of NOMOS with or into any other company, if such merger constitutes a qualified merger. The merger with NASI would constitute a qualified merger.

Liquidation Rights

 

Upon liquidation, dissolution or winding up, after distribution in full of any preferential amounts to be distributed to holders of NASI's preferred stock, if any, and after payment or provision for payment of the debts and other liabilities of NASI, holders of NASI common stock are entitled to receive all of the remaining assets of NASI available for distribution to stockholders ratably in proportion to the number of shares of NASI common stock held by them.

 

In the event of any liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the affairs of NOMOS, after payment or provision for payment of the debts and other liabilities of NOMOS, the holders of shares of the series C preferred stock would be entitled to receive an amount equal to the greater of (i) $3.52 per share, plus any dividends which have accrued but remain unpaid at such time, or (ii) in the event a redemption has been called, the amounts called for therein (see discussion of "redemption rights" above), plus any dividends which have accrued but remain unpaid at such time.

 

 

 

 

If, after payment of the liquidation preference described above to the holders of the series C preferred stock, there are assets of the Corporation available for distribution to its stockholders, the holders of shares of the series B preferred stock and series A preferred stock (which rank on a parity with respect to liquidation preferences) would be entitled to receive, out of the assets of the Corporation, $19.70 per share (in the case of the series A preferred stock) or $9.85 per (in the case of the series B preferred stock) before any distribution shall be made to the holders of the common stock.

 

 

 

 

If, after payment of the liquidation preference described above, there are assets of the corporation available for distribution to its stockholders, each holder of shares of common stock, series A preferred stock, series B preferred stock, and series C preferred stock then outstanding would be entitled to share in the remaining net assets of the Corporation pari passu, on an as-converted-to-common stock basis

 

 

 

 

A consolidation or merger of NOMOS with or into any other corporation, or a sale of all or substantially all of the assets of NOMOS, or a reclassification, recapitalization or reorganization or other similar event is not deemed to be a liquidation of NOMOS for purposes of the series A preferred stock or series B preferred stock, but is deemed to be a liquidation of NOMOS for purposes of the series C preferred stock. However, under the Amended NOMOS Certificate, certain qualified mergers will not be deemed a liquidation of NOMOS. The merger with NASI would constitute a qualified merger.
         

166



Special Meetings of Stockholders; Notice

 

A special meeting of stockholders may be called by the president, the chairman of the board or by the chairman of the board, president or secretary upon the request in writing of a majority of the board of directors or stockholders owning not less than 10% of the shares of any class of the capital stock of NASI issued and outstanding. Under its bylaws, NASI must give each stockholder of record a written notice stating the location, date, time and purpose of the meeting. Notice must be given in writing not fewer than ten nor more than 60 days before the date of the meeting.

 

NOMOS' bylaws provide that a special meeting of stockholders may be called by the president, majority of the directors then in office or by the secretary upon the written request of stockholders who hold at least a majority in number of the outstanding shares of capital stock of NOMOS entitled to vote at such meeting. NOMOS must give each stockholder of record written notice stating the location, date, time and purposes for which the meeting is called. Notice must be given in writing not fewer than ten nor more than 60 days before the date of the meeting.

Record Date for Determining Stockholders Entitled to Vote

 

NASI's bylaws provide that for purposes of determining the stockholders entitled to notice of a meeting or to vote thereat, or to express consent to a corporate action in writing without a meeting, the board of directors of NASI may fix, in advance, a record date which shall not precede the date upon which the resolution fixing the record date is adopted by the board of directors and which shall not be fewer than ten days nor more than 60 days before the date of such meeting, nor more than 60 days prior to any other action. Only stockholders of record on the date fixed by the board of directors are entitled to notice and to vote at the meeting.

 

NOMOS' bylaws provide that for purposes of determining the stockholders entitled to notice of a meeting or to vote thereat, the board of directors may fix, in advance, a record date which shall not be more than 60 days nor less than 10 days before the date of such meeting. Only stockholders of record on the date fixed by the board of directors are entitled to notice and to vote at the meeting. If no record date is fixed, then, under the DGCL, the record date would be the day immediately preceding the date notice of the meeting is given.

Stockholder Action by Written Consent

 

Under the DGCL, unless the bylaws state otherwise, stockholders may take any action without a meeting. NASI's bylaws provide that any action to be taken at any annual or special meeting of stockholders may be taken without a meeting, without prior notice and without a vote if a written consent, setting forth the action so taken, is signed by the holders of outstanding stock having not less than the minimum number of votes that would be necessary to authorize or take such action at a meeting.

 

Any action to be taken at any annual or special meeting of stockholders may be taken without a meeting, without prior notice and without a vote if a written consent, setting forth the action so taken, is signed by the holders of outstanding stock having not less than the minimum number of votes that would be necessary to authorize or take such action at a meeting.
         

167



Stockholder Proposals

 

Pursuant to the NASI's bylaws, a stockholder may propose nominations of directors for election at NASI's annual meeting by giving notice of such nominations, which must be delivered to, or mailed and received by, NASI's secretary not less than 60 or more than 90 days prior to the annual meeting, and the notice must set forth (i) as to each nominee (a) the name, age, business address and residence address of such nominee, (b) the principal occupation, (c) the class and number of shares of NASI beneficially owned by such nominee and (d) such other information required to be disclosed in proxy solicitations pursuant to Regulation 14A under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) as to the stockholder giving notice (a) the name and address, as they appear on NASI's books, (b) the class and number of shares of NASI which are beneficially owned by such stockholder and (c) a representation that such stockholder intends to appear in person or by proxy at the annual meeting to nominate the persons named in its notice. A stockholder may make proposals of other business to be brought before the regularly scheduled annual meeting by giving notice of such proposal, which notice must be delivered to, or mailed and received by, NASI's secretary not less than 120 or more than 150 days prior to the first anniversary of the date of the NASI's proxy statement released to stockholders in connection with the previous year's meeting of stockholders. If NASI did not hold an annual meeting the previous year, or if the date of the current year's annual meeting has been changed from the date of the previous year's meeting, then the deadline is within ten days after NASI has publicly disclosed the date of the annual meeting. Such stockholder's notice must set forth (a) a brief description of the business desired to be brought forth before the annual meeting, (b) name and address, as they appear on NASI's books, of such stockholder, (c) class and number of shares of NASI which are beneficially owned by such stockholder, (d) a description of all arrangements or understandings between such stockholder and any other person in connection with such business and any other material interest of such stockholder in such business and (e) a representation that such stockholder intends to appear in person or by proxy at the annual meeting to bring such business before the meeting.

 

Neither NOMOS' certificate of incorporation nor its bylaws have any provisions regarding stockholder proposals.
         

168



Quorum for Meetings of Stockholders

 

The holders of such number of shares of outstanding stock as are entitled to cast a majority of the votes at a NASI stockholder meeting, present in person or represented by proxy, constitutes a quorum for transacting business at a meeting.

 

The holders of a majority of all outstanding stock entitled to vote at a NOMOS stockholder meeting, present in person or represented by proxy, constitutes a quorum for transacting business at a meeting. In other words, a quorum requires the holders of a majority of the issued and outstanding shares of NOMOS' common stock, series A preferred stock, series B preferred stock and series C preferred stock, on an as-converted-to-common stock basis.

Stockholder Inspection

 

The DGCL provides any stockholder with the right to inspect the company's stock ledger, stockholder lists and other books and records for a purpose reasonably related to the person's interest as a stockholder.

 

The DGCL provides any stockholder with the right to inspect the company's stock ledger, stockholder lists and other books and records for a purpose reasonably related to the person's interest as a stockholder.

Number of Directors

 

NASI currently has seven directors. NASI's bylaws provide that the board of directors shall consist of not less than one nor more than eleven directors, which number shall be determined by resolution of the board of directors or by the stockholders at the annual meeting of the stockholders. Pursuant to the merger agreement, NASI will expand its board of directors to nine persons upon completion of the merger and the board of directors will appoint John W. Manzetti and John A. Friede to the board of directors.

 

NOMOS currently has six directors. NOMOS' bylaws provide that the board of directors shall consist of not less than two and not more than seven directors, which number shall be determined by the board of directors.

Classified Board of Directors

 

NASI does not have a classified board of directors, which means that all members of NASI's board of directors are up for re-election every year.

 

NOMOS does not have a classified board of directors, which means that all members of NOMOS' board of directors are up for re-election every year.

Removal of Directors

 

Under the DGCL, directors may be removed with or without cause by a majority vote of stockholders entitled to vote at the election of directors; however, if the board of directors of the company is classified into several classes of directors, directors may be removed only for cause. Under NASI's bylaws, any director, or the entire board of directors, may be removed, with cause, by the holders of a majority of shares entitled to vote at an election of directors.

 

Under the DGCL, directors may be removed with or without cause by a majority vote of stockholders entitled to vote at the election of directors; however, if the board of directors of the company is classified into several classes of directors, directors may be removed only for cause.

Under NOMOS' bylaws, any director, or the entire board of directors, may be removed, with or without cause, by the holders of a majority of shares entitled to vote at an election of directors.

Limitation on Personal Liability of Directors and Officers

 

NASI's certificate of incorporation provides that directors shall not be personally liable to NASI or its stockholders for monetary damages for breaching their fiduciary duties, except for liability (i) for any breach of the director's duty of loyalty to NASI or its stockholders, (ii) for acts or omissions not in good faith or which involve intentional misconduct or a knowing violation of law, (iii) under Section 174 of the DGCL or (iv) for any transaction from which the director derived an improper personal benefit.

 

NOMOS' certificate of incorporation provides that directors shall not be personally liable to NOMOS or its stockholders for monetary damages for breaching their fiduciary duties, except for liability (i) for any breach of the director's duty of loyalty to NOMOS or its stockholders, (ii) for acts or omissions not in good faith or which involve intentional misconduct or a knowing violation of law, (iii) under Section 174 of the DGCL or (iv) for any transaction from which the director derived an improper personal benefit.
         

169



Indemnification of Directors and Officers

 

The DGCL permits a corporation to indemnify officers, directors, employees and agents for actions taken in good faith and in a manner they reasonably believed to be in, or not opposed to, the best interests of the corporation, and with respect to any criminal action, which they had no reasonable cause to believe was unlawful. The DGCL provides that indemnification may not be made for any claim, issue or matters as to which a person has been adjudged by a court of competent jurisdiction, after exhaustion of all appeals therefrom, to be liable to the corporation, unless and only to the extent a court determines that the person is entitled to indemnity for such expenses as the court deems proper. NASI's certificate of incorporation provides that each person who is involved in any actual or threatened action, suit or proceeding, whether civil, criminal, administrative or investigative, by reason of the fact that he or she is or was a director of NASI, or is or was serving at the request of NASI as a director of another corporation or of a partnership, joint venture, trust, or other enterprise, will be indemnified by NASI, and that each person who is so involved by reason of the fact that he or she was an officer, agent of NASI, or is or was serving at the request of NASI as an officer, agent or employee of another corporation, or of a partnership, joint venture, trust or other enterprise, may be indemnified by the Company in accordance with the DGCL. The indemnification rights conferred by NASI's certificate of incorporation are not exclusive of any other right to which persons seeking indemnification may be entitled under any law, bylaw, agreement, vote of stockholders or disinterested directors or otherwise. NASI is authorized to purchase and maintain insurance on behalf of its directors, officers, employees and agents. Additionally, NASI shall pay expenses incurred by their respective directors or officers in defending a civil or criminal action, suit or proceeding because that person is a director or officer, in advance of the final disposition of that action, suit or proceeding. However, such payment will be made only if NASI receives an undertaking by or on behalf of that director or officer to repay all amounts advanced if it is ultimately determined that he or she is not entitled to be indemnified by NASI, as authorized by NASI's certificate of incorporation.

 

The DGCL permits a corporation to indemnify officers, directors, employees and agents for actions taken in good faith and in a manner they reasonably believed to be in, or not opposed to, the best interests of the corporation, and with respect to any criminal action, which they had no reasonable cause to believe was unlawful. The DGCL provides that indemnification may not be made for any claim, issue or matters as to which a person has been adjudged by a court of competent jurisdiction, after exhaustion of all appeals therefrom, to be liable to the corporation, unless and only to the extent a court determines that the person is entitled to indemnity for such expenses as the court deems proper.

NOMOS' certificate of incorporation provides for the indemnification of directors and officers of the corporation for all expenses and liabilities to the fullest extent permitted under the DGCL. The indemnification rights provided for in the certificate of incorporation are not exclusive of any other rights to which those indemnified persons may be entitled under any bylaw, agreement, vote of stockholders or directors or otherwise.

NOMOS' bylaws generally provide that any person who was or is a party or is threatened to be a party to or is involved in any action, suit, or proceeding, whether civil, criminal, administrative or investigative, because that person is or was a director or officer, or is or was serving at the request of NOMOS as a director or officer of another corporation or of a partnership, joint venture, trust or other enterprise, will be indemnified and held harmless by NOMOS, to the fullest extent permitted by law against expenses reasonably incurred or suffered by such person in connection therewith, including attorney's fees, judgments, fines and amounts paid in settlement. These rights to indemnification include the right to be paid by NOMOS the expenses incurred in defending any such proceeding in advance of the final disposition of such proceeding. However, to the extent required by the law, the payment of such expenses incurred by an officer or director in advance of the final disposition of a proceeding may be made only upon receipt of an undertaking, by such person, to repay all amounts so advanced if it is ultimately determined that such person is not entitled to be indemnified. The indemnification rights conferred by NOMOS' bylaws are not exclusive of any other right to which persons seeking indemnification may be entitled under any statute, NOMOS' certificate of incorporation, any agreement, vote of stockholders or disinterested directors or otherwise.
         

170



Amendments to Certificate of Incorporation

 

Under the DGCL, a majority vote of the outstanding shares of common stock is required to amend a company's certificate of incorporation. Under NASI's certificate of incorporation, NASI reserves the right to amend or repeal any provision contained in its certificate of incorporation in any manner prescribed by the DGCL, and all rights conferred to stockholders are granted subject to this reservation.

 

Under the DGCL, a majority vote of the outstanding shares of common stock is required to amend a company's certificate of incorporation, and a separate class vote is required for any such amendment that adversely affects that class.

Additionally, NOMOS may not amend its certificate of incorporation in a manner that would adversely affect any of its series of preferred stock without first obtaining the approval of the holders of at least a majority (or in the case of the series C, at least 75%) of the number of shares of such series of preferred stock then outstanding.

Amendments to Bylaws

 

NASI's bylaws may be amended, altered or repealed, or new bylaws may be adopted, by a majority vote of the board of directors or the stockholders; provided, however, that the power of the board of directors to amend, alter or repeal shall not divest or limit the power of the stockholders to adopt, amend or repeal the bylaws.

 

NOMOS' bylaws provide that they may be amended, altered or repealed, and new bylaws may be adopted, by a majority of the board of directors or the stockholders. However, NOMOS' certificate of incorporation provides that NOMOS may not amend its bylaws in a manner that would adversely affect any of its series of preferred stock without first obtaining the approval of the holders of at least a majority (or in the case of the series C, at least 75%) of the number of shares of such series of preferred stock then outstanding.

Anti-Takeover Provisions

 

Section 203 of the DGCL prohibits a Delaware corporation from engaging in a "business combination" with a person owning 15% or more of the corporation's voting stock, referred to as an "interested stockholder," for three years following the time that person became an interested stockholder, unless any one of the following occurs:
• The board of directors approves the stock acquisition or the business combination before the person becomes an interested stockholder
• The person became an interested stockholder in a transaction in which it acquired at least 85% of the voting stock in the transaction, excluding shares owned by directors and officers and shares owned by some employee stock plans
• A combination transaction is approved by the board of directors and by at least two-thirds of the outstanding voting stock not owned by the interested stockholder A Delaware corporation may elect in its certificate of incorporation or bylaws not to be governed by Section 203. NASI has not made that election.

 

Section 203 of the DGCL does not apply to NOMOS.
         

171



Stockholder Rights Plan

 

As described in the Rights Agreement dated as of October 16, 1998, as amended, between NASI and U.S. Stock Transfer Corporation, as rights agent, on October 22, 1998, NASI declared a dividend distribution of one right for each outstanding share of common stock outstanding on October 22, 1998. All shares of common stock issued since this date have also had a right issued for them. In the case of certain triggering events, each right entitles the holder of common stock to purchase, upon exercise of the right, a number of shares of common stock having a market value of two times the exercise price of the rights. Generally, the rights are not exercisable until such time as a person or group has announced it has acquired or obtained the right to acquire 15% or more of our common stock, commenced a tender or exchange offer to purchase 15% or more of our common stock or upon certain other events. The rights plan may be amended by NASI without the approval of the holders of common stock. Prior to becoming exercisable, NASI may redeem the rights at any time for nominal consideration. The rights expire on October 22, 2008. One right will be issued for each share of common stock issued in connection with the merger. In addition, immediately prior to the consummation of the merger, NASI intends to amend the rights plan to provide that John A. Friede shall not be deemed an "Acquiring Person" (as such term is defined in the rights agreement) due solely to the issuance of shares in the merger transaction, the exercise of any options of NASI issued in the merger transaction or otherwise granted to Mr. Friede in connection with his service on the NASI board of directors or the aquisition of beneficial ownership of any NASI equity securities representing up to 5% of NASI common stock which are deposited in the voting trust agreement.

 

NOMOS has not adopted a stockholder rights plan.

Provisions Relating to Some Mergers and Other Business Combinations

 

The DGCL generally requires that a merger or consolidation or sale, lease or exchange of all or substantially all of a corporation's property and assets be approved by the directors and by a majority of the outstanding stock.
Under the DGCL, a surviving corporation need not obtain stockholder approval for a merger if:
• Each share of the surviving corporation's stock outstanding prior to the merger remains outstanding in identical form after the merger
• The merger agreement does not amend the certificate of incorporation of the surviving corporation
• Either no shares of common stock of the surviving corporation are to be issued or delivered in the merger, or, if common stock will be issued or delivered, it will not increase the number of shares of common stock outstanding prior to the merger by more than 20%.

 

The DGCL generally requires that a merger or consolidation or sale, lease or exchange of all or substantially all of a corporation's property and assets be approved by the directors and by a majority of the outstanding stock.
Under the DGCL, a surviving corporation need not obtain stockholder approval for a merger if:
• Each share of the surviving corporation's stock outstanding prior to the merger remains outstanding in identical form after the merger;
• The merger agreement does not amend the certificate of incorporation of the surviving corporation; and
• Either no shares of common stock of the surviving corporation are to be issued or delivered in the merger, or, if common stock will be issued or delivered, it will not increase the number of shares of common stock outstanding prior to the merger by more than 20%.
         

172



 

 

 

 

Under NOMOS' certificate of incorporation, a merger of NOMOS with or into another corporation does not require a separate class vote of the any of NOMOS' outstanding classes or series of capital stock. However, NOMOS' various series of preferred stock are entitled to anti-dilution protection in connection with certain mergers. See "Anti-Dilution Protections," above. In addition, certain mergers are deemed a liquidation event for purposes of the series C stock. See "Liquidation Rights," above.

Appraisal or Dissenters' Rights

 

Under the DGCL, the right of dissenting stockholders to obtain the fair value for their shares is available in connection with some mergers and consolidations. Unless otherwise provided in the corporate certificate of incorporation, appraisal rights are not available to stockholders when the corporation will be the surviving corporation in a merger and no vote of its stockholders is required to approve the merger. In addition, no appraisal rights are available to holders of shares of any class of stock which is either:
• Listed on a national securities exchange or designated as a national market system security on an interdealer quotation system by the NASD; or
• Held of record by more than 2,000 stockholders.

 

Under the DGCL, the right of dissenting stockholders to obtain the fair value for their shares is available in connection with some mergers and consolidations. Appraisal rights are not available to stockholders when the corporation will be the surviving corporation in a merger and no vote of its stockholders is required to approve the merger. In addition, no appraisal rights are available to holders of shares of any class of stock which is either:
• Listed on a national securities exchange or designated as a national market system security on an interdealer quotation system by the NASD; or
• Held of record by more than 2,000 stockholders.

173



DESCRIPTION OF NASI CAPITAL STOCK

        The following is a summary of the material terms of NASI's capital stock. It is only a summary; therefore, it is not meant to be complete and does not contain all of the information that may be important to you. Accordingly, you should read carefully the more detailed provisions of NASI's certificate of incorporation, NASI's bylaws and NASI's Rights Agreement, all of which are incorporated by reference in this joint proxy statement/prospectus and will be sent to stockholders of NASI and NOMOS upon request. See "Where You Can Find More Information".

General

        NASI is authorized to issue 40,000,000 shares of common stock, $0.01 par value per share, and 2,000,000 shares of preferred stock, $0.01 par value per share.

Common Stock

        As of March 10, 2004, there were 10,353,807 shares of NASI common stock outstanding that were held by approximately [    ] stockholders of record. Holders of common stock are entitled to one vote per share for the election of directors and all other matters submitted to a vote of NASI stockholders. Subject to the rights of any holders of preferred stock which may be issued in the future, the holders of common stock are entitled to share ratably in such dividends as may be declared by NASI's board of directors out of funds legally available therefor. In the event of NASI's dissolution, liquidation or winding up, holders of common stock are entitled to share ratably in all assets remaining after payment of all liabilities and liquidation preferences of any preferred stock. Holders of common stock have no preemptive, subscription, redemption or conversion rights or similar rights. The Certificate of Incorporation does not provide for cumulative voting rights with respect to the election of directors. All outstanding common stock is, and the common stock to be issued in connection with the merger will be, fully paid and nonassessable.

Preferred Stock

        NASI's board of directors has the authority, without action by the stockholders, to designate and issue preferred stock in one or more series and to designate the rights, preferences and privileges of each series, which may be greater than the rights of the common stock. It is not possible to state the actual effect of the issuance of any shares of preferred stock upon the rights of holders of the common stock until the board of directors determines the specific rights of the holders of any such preferred stock. However, the effects might include, among other things:

        No shares of preferred stock are outstanding and NASI has no present plans to issue any shares of preferred stock.

Certain Anti-Takeover Effects of Provisions of the Certificate of Incorporation, Bylaws and Delaware Law

        NASI is subject to the provisions of Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law regulating corporate takeovers. Section 203 prevents certain Delaware corporations from engaging,

174



under certain circumstances, in a "business combination" (which includes a merger or sale of more than 10% of the corporation's assets) with any "interested stockholder" (a stockholder who acquires 15% or more of the corporation's outstanding voting stock without the prior approval of the corporation's board of directors) for three years following the date that such stockholder becomes an "interested stockholder". A corporation may "opt out" of the application of Section 203, which NASI has not done.

Stockholders Rights Plan

        In October 1998, NASI adopted a rights plan for the purpose of protecting the holders of common stock in the event of an attempted takeover by a third party that has not been approved by NASI's board of directors. On October 22, 1998, NASI declared a dividend distribution of one right for each outstanding share of common stock outstanding on that date. All shares of common stock issued since such date have also had a right issued for them. In the case of certain triggering events, each right entitles the holder of common stock to purchase, upon exercise of the right, a number of shares of common stock having a market value of two times the exercise price of the rights. Generally, the rights are not exercisable until such time as a person or group has announced it has acquired or obtained the right to acquire 15% or more of our common stock or commenced a tender or exchange offer to purchase 15% or more of our common stock or upon certain other events. The rights plan may be amended by NASI without the approval of the holders of common stock. Prior to becoming exercisable, NASI may redeem the rights at any time for nominal consideration. The rights expire on October 22, 2008. One right will be issued for each share of common stock issued in connection with the merger. In addition, immediately prior to the consummation of the merger, NASI intends to amend the rights plan to provide that John A. Friede shall not be deemed an "Acquiring Person" (as such term is defined in the rights agreement) due solely to Mr. Friede's receipt of shares issued in the merger transaction and his exercise of any options of NASI received by Mr. Friede in the merger transaction or otherwise granted to Mr. Friede in connection with his service on the NASI board of directors, or his acquisition of beneficial ownership of any additional NASI securities representing up to 5% of NASI common stock which are deposited into the voting trust executed by John A. Friede and NASI. The rights agreement could have the effect of discouraging, delaying or preventing (1) a change of control of NASI or (2) unsolicited acquisition proposals that NASI stockholders may consider in their best interest. In addition, the rights agreement could make it more difficult for a NASI stockholder or a third party to obtain a controlling interest in NASI and thereafter change the composition of the board of directors or management of NASI.

Transfer Agent

        The Transfer Agent for NASI's common stock is U.S. Stock Transfer Corporation. The Transfer Agent's address is 1745 Gardena Avenue, Suite 200, Glendale, California 91204 and its telephone number is (818) 502-1404.

175



LEGAL MATTERS

        McDermott, Will & Emery, Los Angeles, California, will render an opinion on the legality of the NASI common stock to be issued to NOMOS stockholders in the merger. It is a condition to the completion of the merger that each of NASI and NOMOS receive an opinion from McDermott, Will & Emery and Cohen & Grigsby, P.C., respectively, concerning the tax treatment of the merger.


EXPERTS

        The financial statements of North American Scientific, Inc. incorporated in this joint proxy statement/prospectus by reference to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended October 31, 2003, have been so incorporated in reliance on the report of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, independent accountants, given on the authority of said firm as experts in accounting and auditing.

        The financial statements of NOMOS Corporation as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, and for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2003, appearing in this joint proxy statement/prospectus, have been audited by Ernst & Young LLP, independent auditors, as set forth in their report thereon appearing elsewhere herein, and are included in reliance upon such report given on the authority of such firm as experts in accounting and auditing.

176



ADDITIONAL INFORMATION FOR STOCKHOLDERS

Future Stockholder Proposals

NASI

        Under the present rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission, if a stockholder wants NASI to include a proposal in its proxy statement and form of proxy for presentation at NASI's 2004 annual meeting of the stockholders, the proposal must have been received by NASI by October 16, 2003, attention: Secretary, at 20200 Sunburst Street, Chatsworth, California 91311; provided, however, that if the date of the 2004 annual meeting of stockholders is changed by more than 30 days from the date of the previous year's meeting held on March 28, 2003, then the deadline is a reasonable time before NASI begins to print and mail its proxy materials. Any nomination for directors or item of business to be introduced at an annual meeting of stockholders must be submitted in writing to the Secretary of NASI at the address noted above. If NASI does not receive notice by that date, or if we meet other requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission rules, the persons named as proxies in the proxy materials relating to that meeting will use their discretion in voting the proxies when these matters are raised at the meeting. NASI currently anticipates that its next annual meeting will be held in June 2004.

        Any nomination must contain all of the following information about the nominee:

        Any notice of a proposed item of business must include all of the following information:


        NASI's board of directors is not aware of any matters that are expected to come before the special meeting other than those referred to in this joint proxy statement/prospectus. If any other matter should come before the special meeting, the persons named in the accompanying proxy intend to vote the proxies in accordance with their best judgment. The chairman of the meeting may refuse to allow the transaction of any business not presented beforehand.

NOMOS

        NOMOS does not currently expect to hold a 2004 annual meeting of stockholders because NOMOS expects to be a wholly owned subsidiary of NASI if the merger has been consummated as

177



contemplated. If the merger has not been consummated and such a meeting is held, stockholder proposals will be eligible for consideration at such meeting in accordance with NOMOS' bylaws and applicable law.


WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION

        NASI files annual, quarterly and current reports, proxy statements and other information with the Securities and Exchange Commission. You may read and copy any of these reports, statements or other information at the Securities and Exchange Commission's public reference room located at 450 Fifth Street, N.W., Washington D.C. 20549. Please call the Securities and Exchange Commission at l-800-SEC-0330 for further information on the public reference room. NASI's Securities and Exchange Commission filings are also available to the public from commercial document retrieval services and at the web site maintained by the Securities and Exchange Commission at www.sec.gov.

        NASI has filed a registration statement on Form S-4 to register with the Securities and Exchange Commission the NASI common stock to be issued to NOMOS stockholders upon completion of the merger. This joint proxy statement/prospectus is a part of that registration statement and constitutes a prospectus of NASI in addition to being a proxy statement of NASI and NOMOS for their respective stockholder meetings. As allowed by the Securities and Exchange Commission rules, this joint proxy statement/prospectus does not contain all the information you can find in the registration statement or the exhibits to the registration statement.

        The Securities and Exchange Commission allows us to "incorporate by reference" information into this joint proxy statement/prospectus, meaning that we can disclose important information by referring to another document filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The information incorporated by reference is deemed to be part of this joint proxy statement/prospectus, except for any information superseded by information in, or incorporated by reference in, this joint proxy statement/prospectus. This joint proxy statement/prospectus incorporates by reference the documents set forth below that we have previously filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. These documents contain important information about our company and its finances.

NASI SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION FILINGS (FILE NO. 000-26670)

  PERIOD
Annual Report on Form 10-K, as amended   Fiscal Year ended October 31, 2003

Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q

 

Quarter ended January 31, 2004

Current Reports on Form 8-K

 

Filed on May 22, 2003, July 2, 2003, August 28, 2003, October 14, 2003, October 27, 2003, December 18, 2003, February 6, 2004, February 27, 2004 and March 5, 2004

Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A

 

Filed on February 13, 2003

The description of the rights agreement, contained in the Registration Statement on Form 8-A/A filed pursuant to Section 12 of the Exchange Act on October 16, 1998 including any amendment or report filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission for the purpose of updating this description

 

Filed on October 16, 1998

178


        NASI is also incorporating by reference additional documents that the company has filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission under Section 13(a), 13(c), 14 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act between the date of the initial filing of the registration statement of which this joint proxy statement/prospectus is a part and the effectiveness of the registration statement, as well as between the date of this joint proxy statement/prospectus and the termination of the offering contemplated by this joint proxy statement/prospectus.

        All information contained or incorporated by reference in this joint proxy statement/prospectus relating to NASI has been supplied by NASI, and all information relating to NOMOS has been supplied by NOMOS.

        If you are a stockholder, you may have already received some of the documents incorporated by reference. Alternatively, you can obtain any of these documents through us or the Securities and Exchange Commission. Documents incorporated by reference are available from NASI without charge, excluding all exhibits unless NASI has specifically incorporated by reference an exhibit in this joint proxy statement/prospectus. Stockholders may obtain documents incorporated by reference in this joint proxy statement/ prospectus by requesting them in writing or by telephone from the appropriate party at the following address:

North American
Scientific, Inc.
20200 Sunburst Street
Chatsworth, California 91311
Attention: Corporate Secretary
(818) 734-8600

        If you are an NASI stockholder and would like to request documents from NASI, please do so by                        , 2004 to receive them before NASI's special meeting.

        You can also get more information by visiting NASI's website at www.NASI.net. Except to the limited extent expressly provided in this joint proxy statement/prospectus, information contained in our website is not incorporated by reference into this joint proxy statement/prospectus.

        If you are a stockholder of NOMOS and have any questions or require additional material from NOMOS, please call David J. Haffner at NOMOS at the number below. Copies of the NOMOS certificate of incorporation and bylaws are available from NOMOS, without charge, upon oral request to Mr. Haffner, or upon written request to the following address:

NOMOS Corporation
200 West Kensinger Drive, Suite 100
Cranberry Township, PA 16066
Attention: David J. Haffner
(724) 741-8200

You should rely only on the information contained or incorporated by reference in this joint proxy statement/prospectus to vote on the proposals to NASI and NOMOS stockholders in connection with the merger and the amendments to NASI's Amended and Restated 1996 Stock Option Plan, as the case may be. We have not authorized anyone to provide you with information that is different from what is contained in this joint proxy statement/prospectus. This joint proxy statement/prospectus is dated                        , 2004. You should not assume that the information contained in this joint proxy statement/prospectus is accurate as of any date other than such date, and neither the mailing of this joint proxy statement/prospectus to stockholders nor the issuance of shares of NASI common stock in connection with the merger shall create any implication to the contrary.

179



INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 
  Page
Report of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Auditors   F-2
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2002 and 2003   F-3
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2001, 2002 and 2003   F-4
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity (Deficiency) for the years ended December 31, 2001, 2002 and 2003   F-5
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2001, 2002 and 2003   F-6
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements   F-7

F-1



Report of Independent Auditors

Stockholders
NOMOS Corporation

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of NOMOS Corporation as of December 31, 2002 and 2003, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity (deficiency), and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2003. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of NOMOS Corporation at December 31, 2002 and 2003, and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2003, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
February 27, 2004

F-2


NOMOS Corporation
Consolidated Balance Sheets

 
  December 31
 
 
  2002
  2003
 
Assets              
Current assets:              
  Cash and cash equivalents   $ 3,272,358   $ 3,138,864  
  Accounts receivable, net     7,203,233     6,729,961  
  Inventories     3,418,109     4,110,742  
  Other current assets     862,926     399,070  
   
 
 
Total current assets     14,756,626     14,378,637  
Property and equipment, net     863,334     1,524,638  
Noncurrent receivables     115,170     249,348  
Related party receivable         296,853  
Other assets     74,932     85,525  
   
 
 
Total assets   $ 15,810,062   $ 16,535,001  
   
 
 
Liabilities and stockholders' equity (deficiency)              
Current liabilities:              
  Accounts payable   $ 2,665,129   $ 2,834,361  
  Accrued compensation     781,295     587,533  
  Accrued royalties     153,490     196,000  
  Advance billings     784,242     880,195  
  Unearned services revenue     3,444,356     3,827,595  
  Other accruals     1,854,502     1,497,346  
   
 
 
Total current liabilities     9,683,014     9,823,030  
Accrued relocation costs     296,800      
Unearned services revenue     939,585     1,245,938  
   
 
 
Total liabilities     10,919,399     11,068,968  
Redeemable convertible Series C preferred stock     7,661,362     9,702,405  
Stockholders' equity (deficiency):              
  Series A convertible preferred stock; $.0001 par value; 1,000,000 shares authorized; 374,748 shares issued and outstanding in 2002 and 2003     37     37  
  Series B convertible preferred stock; $.0001 par value, 4,000,000 shares authorized; 1,861,909 shares issued and outstanding in 2002 and 2003     186     186  
  Common stock; $.0001 par value; 25,000,000 shares authorized; 3,611,448 and 3,708,375 shares issued in 2002 and 2003, respectively     361     371  
Deferred stock-based compensation     (91,116 )   (353,339 )
Foreign translation adjustment         (24,929 )
Paid-in capital     75,331,679     75,992,390  
Accumulated deficit     (77,668,568 )   (79,507,810 )
Treasury stock at cost—75,599 common shares     (343,278 )   (343,278 )
   
 
 
Total stockholders' equity (deficiency)     (2,770,699 )   (4,236,372 )
   
 
 
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity (deficiency)   $ 15,810,062   $ 16,535,001  
   
 
 

See accompanying notes.

F-3


NOMOS Corporation
Consolidated Statements of Operations

 
  Years ended December 31
 
 
  2001
  2002
  2003
 
Revenues                    
Product   $ 20,044,279   $ 24,342,834   $ 19,780,443  
Service     4,460,431     6,782,628     9,232,321  
   
 
 
 
      24,504,710     31,125,462     29,012,764  
Cost of revenues (excluding stock-based compensation of $46,652, $(46,470), and $152,513 in the years ended December 31, 2001, 2002, and 2003, respectively):                    
  Product     8,489,961     9,935,099     10,281,084  
  Service     3,168,587     4,518,816     4,126,922  
   
 
 
 
      11,658,548     14,453,915     14,408,006  
   
 
 
 
Gross margin     12,846,162     16,671,547     14,604,758  
Operating expenses                    
Research and development (excluding stock-based compensation of $804,819, $607,259, and $242,120 in the years ended December 31, 2001, 2002, and 2003, respectively)     4,152,489     5,392,003     4,785,399  
Sales and marketing (excluding stock-based compensation of $131,583, $(126,090), and $518,221 in the years ended December 31, 2001, 2002, and 2003, respectively)     3,984,281     6,663,047     6,751,683  
General and administrative (excluding stock-based compensation of $1,461,526, $(382,531) and $1,428,851 in the years ended December 31, 2001, 2002, and 2003, respectively)     2,950,737     4,192,743     3,766,650  
Stock-based compensation     2,444,580     52,168     2,341,705  
Offering, relocation and merger costs         2,507,208     610,000  
   
 
 
 
Total operating expenses     13,532,087     18,807,169     18,255,437  
   
 
 
 
Loss from operations     (685,925 )   (2,135,622 )   (3,650,679 )
Interest expense     (65,290 )        
Other income (expense)—net     168,503     70,864     1,811,437  
   
 
 
 
Loss from continuing operations     (582,712 )   (2,064,758 )   (1,839,242 )
   
 
 
 
Net loss     (582,712 )   (2,064,758 )   (1,839,242 )
Plus preferred dividends     1,225,888     1,799,279     2,041,043  
   
 
 
 
Net loss applicable to common stock   $ (1,808,600 ) $ (3,864,037 ) $ (3,880,285 )
   
 
 
 
Net loss per share—basic and diluted   $ (0.63 ) $ (1.19 ) $ (1.07 )
   
 
 
 
Weighted average common shares outstanding—basic and diluted     2,856,444     3,240,072     3,615,966  
   
 
 
 

See accompanying notes.

F-4


NOMOS Corporation

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity (Deficiency)

 
  Number of
Shares Series A
Preferred

  Preferred
A Stock

  Number of
Shares
Series B
Preferred

  Preferred
B Stock

  Number of
Common
Shares

  Common
Stock

  Warrants
  Deferred
Stock-Based
Compensation

  Paid-in
Capital

  Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Loss

  Accumulated
Deficit

  Treasury
Stock

  Total
Stockholders'
Equity
(Deficiency)

 
Balance, December 31, 2000   374,748   $ 37     $   2,883,504   $ 288   $ 1,521,950   $   $ 55,261,348   $   $ (75,021,098 ) $ (343,278 ) $ (18,580,753 )
  Issuance of preferred stock as part of debt con- version, net of $39,941 issuance costs         1,861,746     186                   18,298,073                 18,298,259  
  Issuance of preferred stock         163                       1,600                 1,600  
  Exercise of common stock options               605,161     61             596,023                 596,084  
  Dividends and accretion on redeemable stock                               (1,225,888 )               (1,225,888 )
  Deferred stock-based compensation                           (2,620,524 )   2,620,524                  
  Deferred stock-based compensation from employee put agreement                           (821,217 )   1,479,670                 658,453  
  Amortization of stock-based compensation                           1,786,127                     1,786,127  
  Exercise and forfeitures of warrants                       (1,521,950 )       1,521,950                  
  Net loss                                       (582,712 )       (582,712 )
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Balance, December 31, 2001   374,748     37   1,861,909     186   3,488,665     349         (1,655,614 )   78,553,300         (75,603,810 )   (343,278 )   951,170  
  Exercise of common stock options and warrants               122,783     12             89,988                 90,000  
  Dividends and accretion on redeemable stock                               (1,799,279 )               (1,799,279 )
  Amortization of deferred stock-based compensation from employee put agreement                           730,101     19,467                 749,568  
  Reduction in variable deferred stock-based compensation                           834,397     (834,397 )                
  Net reduction in variable stock-based compensation                                 (697,400 )                 (697,400 )
  Net loss                                       (2,064,758 )       (2,064,758 )
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Balance, December 31, 2002   374,748     37   1,861,909     186   3,611,448     361         (91,116 )   75,331,679         (77,668,568 )   (343,278 )   (2,770,699 )
  Exercise of common stock options and warrants               96,927     10             97,826                 97,836  
  Dividends and accretion on redeemable stock                               (2,041,043 )               (2,041,043 )
  Amortization of deferred stock-based compensation from employee put agreement                           91,116     (19,467 )               71,649  
  Deferred stock-based compensation                           (456,380 )   456,380                  
  Amortization of stock-based compensation                           103,041                     103,041  
  Variable deferred stock-based compensation                               2,167,015                 2,167,015  
  Net loss                                       (1,839,242 )       (1,839,242 )
  Foreign currency translation                                   (24,929 )           (24,929 )
                                                                     
 
  Total comprehensive loss                                               (1,864,171 )
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Balance, December 31, 2003   374,748   $ 37   1,861,909   $ 186   3,708,375   $ 371   $   $ (353,339 ) $ 75,992,390   $ (24,929 ) $ (79,507,810 ) $ (343,278 ) $ (4,236,372 )
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

See accompanying notes.

F-5


NOMOS Corporation

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

 
  Years ended December 31
 
 
  2001
  2002
  2003
 
Cash flows from operating activities                    
Net loss   $ (582,712 ) $ (2,064,758 ) $ (1,839,242 )
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by (used for) operating activities:                    
  Depreciation and amortization     223,067     508,989     650,078  
  Stock-based compensation expense     2,444,580     52,168     2,341,705  
  Interest costs satisfied with preferred stock     65,290          
  Changes in net assets and liabilities:                    
    Accounts receivable     (2,137,376 )   (2,428,590 )   339,094  
    Inventories     363,668     101,015     (692,633 )
    Prepaid expenses and other assets     (269,591 )   (323,847 )   131,482  
    Accounts payable     573,203     (194,453 )   169,232  
    Accrued compensation     442,890     (376,448 )   (193,762 )
    Accrued royalties     (65,120 )   19,740     42,510  
    Advance billings     (1,784,818 )   (219,436 )   95,953  
    Unearned services revenue     854,915     1,781,884     689,592  
    Other accruals     1,104,222     850,859     (653,956 )
   
 
 
 
Net cash provided by (used for) continuing operations     1,232,218     (2,292,877 )   1,080,053  
Net cash used for discontinued operations     (400,921 )        
   
 
 
 
Net cash provided by (used for) operating activities     831,297     (2,292,877 )   1,080,053  

Cash flows from investing activities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
Capital expenditures     (698,817 )   (516,071 )   (1,311,383 )
   
 
 
 
Net cash used for investing activities     (698,817 )   (516,071 )   (1,311,383 )

Cash flows from financing activities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
Proceeds from Series B and C preferred stock issuance     4,637,795          
Issuance cost of preferred stock issuance     (39,941 )        
Exercise of stock options and warrants     596,084     90,000     97,836  
   
 
 
 
Net cash provided by financing activities     5,193,938     90,000     97,836  
   
 
 
 
Net (decrease) increase in cash     5,326,418     (2,718,948 )   (133,494 )
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year     664,888     5,991,306     3,272,358  
   
 
 
 
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year   $ 5,991,306   $ 3,272,358   $ 3,138,864  
   
 
 
 
Supplemental disclosure of noncash operating, investing, and financing activities                    
Exercise and forfeitures of warrants   $ 1,521,950   $ 369,212   $  
Issuance of preferred stock in exchange for debt     18,338,200          
Preferred dividends and related accretion     1,255,888     1,799,279     2,041,043  

See accompanying notes.

F-6



NOMOS Corporation

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2001, 2002, and 2003

1. The Company

        NOMOS Corporation (NOMOS or the Company) is a Delaware Corporation based in Cranberry Township, Pennsylvania. The Company develops, sells, and services advanced medical equipment products that improve the effectiveness of radiation therapy in the treatment of solid cancerous tumors. The Company pioneered the commercialization of a technology known as intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). IMRT allows a doctor to deliver escalated radiation doses to a tumor target, while limiting damage to nearby healthy tissue. The Company sells its products to hospitals and clinics throughout the world.

        CORVUS is the Company's IMRT-based software product that helps doctors improve the planning of radiation therapy. The Company also produces products that are complementary to its IMRT products. In 1998, the Company introduced BAT, its ultrasound-based targeting system that permits a doctor to improve daily alignment and verification of tumor location. In 2001, the Company introduced PEREGRINE, a statistical software product that simulates the path of radiation particles as they are absorbed by the body to enable doctors to more precisely prescribe radiation treatments.

        Customers use the IMRT products (CORVUS, MIMiC and PEACOCK) in conjunction with linear accelerators, which are the machines that generate the energy beams used in radiation cancer therapy.

        The Company currently markets five primary products to the radiation therapy market:

        Revenue from sales of the Company's IMRT planning and delivery products, CORVUS, PEACOCK and MIMiC, represented approximately 35% of the Company's total revenues in 2001, approximately 36% of the Company's total revenues in 2002, and approximately 29% for 2003. Revenue from the Company's ultrasound-based targeting system, BAT, which was first introduced in 1998, represented approximately 43% of the Company's total revenues in 2001, 40% of the Company's total revenues in 2002, and approximately 39% of the Company's total revenues in 2003.

        The Company operates in one reportable segment (radiation therapy market). More than 95% of NOMOS' revenue for the years presented are from transactions within North America, and no customer accounts for more than 10% of its revenue.

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Reclassifications

        Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation. The reclassifications had no impact on the Company's operations, cash flows, or stockholders' equity.

F-7



Revenue Recognition

        Revenues and related cost of sales for hardware products are generally recognized upon shipment (title transfer), which in some cases precedes customer acceptance, as the performance of installation obligations is essentially perfunctory and there is a demonstrated history of customer acceptance following shipment. Additionally, hardware revenues are recognized only if persuasive evidence of an agreement exists, the fee is fixed and determinable and collection of the amount due from the customer is deemed probable, and all significant vendor obligations are satisfied. The Company's hardware products are generally subject to installation and warranty, and the Company provides for the estimated future costs of installation, repair, replacement, or customer accommodation in cost of sales when sales are recognized. The Company records the estimated warranty obligation based on historical experience of cost incurred.

        Revenues and related cost of sales for software products are generally recognized at the time of customer acceptance, which normally is at installation. Additionally, software revenues are recognized only if persuasive evidence of an agreement exists, the fee is fixed and determinable and collection of the amount due from the customer is deemed probable, and all significant vendor obligations are satisfied. In sales contracts that have multielement arrangements, the Company allocates the sales contract using the residual method. The total fair value of the undelivered elements as indicated by vendor-specific objective evidence (price charged when the undelivered element is sold individually) is deferred and the difference between the total arrangement fee and the amount deferred for the undelivered elements is recognized as revenue related to the delivered elements.

        Services revenues are derived mainly from maintenance contracts and are recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the contract. Payments for maintenance revenues are normally received in advance and are nonrefundable.

Advance Billings and Unearned Services Revenue

        Revenue payments received from customers in advance of shipments for hardware products and acceptance for software products are recorded as advance billings. The unamortized portion of maintenance revenue is recorded as unearned services revenue.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

        Short-term investments include highly liquid investments, principally certificates of deposit and United States Government-backed securities and interest-bearing deposits with original maturities of less than ninety (90) days.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

        The carrying amounts of the Company's financial instruments, including cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, and accounts payable, approximate fair value due to their short maturities.

F-8



Inventories

        Inventories are valued at the lower of first-in, first-out (FIFO) cost or market and consist of the following:

 
  December 31
 
  2002
  2003
Raw materials   $ 3,185,297   $ 3,760,548
Work-in-process         59,186
Finished goods     232,812     291,008
   
 
    $ 3,418,109   $ 4,110,742
   
 

        NOMOS assembles components manufactured by qualified subcontractors. Included in raw materials are components for both future product shipments and replacement or repair parts. NOMOS typically assembles products to meet customer demands and as a result maintains relatively minor amounts of work-in-process or finished goods inventory.

Property and Equipment

        All equipment, furniture and fixtures are recorded at cost. For financial reporting purposes, depreciation is computed principally using the straight-line method over the estimated useful life of the asset (generally three to five years), and by accelerated methods for income tax reporting purposes. Expenditures for maintenance and repairs are charged to expense as incurred.

Software Development Costs

        During 2001, 2002 and 2003, the Company did not capitalize software development costs. Historically, management has defined technological feasibility for software at the point where Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval has been received and beta testing is completed. As such, there have been insignificant amounts of software costs incurred subsequent to technological feasibility for capitalization.

Research and Development Costs

        Research and development costs are charged to expense when incurred.

Shipping Costs

        Shipping costs in the amounts of $198,000, $385,000, and $466,000 during 2001, 2002, and 2003, respectively, are included in cost of sales.

Advertising Costs

        Advertising and sales promotions are charged to expense during the period in which they are incurred. Total advertising and sales promotions expense for the years ended December 31, 2001, 2002, and 2003 were approximately $253,000, $355,000, and $329,000, respectively.

F-9



Net Loss Per Share

        Net loss per common share is computed based upon the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Dilutive securities include options, warrants, and convertible preferred stock. The dilutive effect of stock options, warrants, and preferred stock has been excluded from the determination of "basic" earnings per share and are only included in "diluted" earnings per share if their effects are not antidilutive. Shares of potentially dilutive securities totaled 6,021,548, 5,683,310, and 5,678,955 for the years ended December 31, 2001, 2002, and 2003, respectively.

Principles of Consolidation

        Significant intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in the consolidation of the accounts of the companies.

Use of Estimates

        The preparation of the Company's financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the balance sheet dates and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation

        The Company accounts for its Stock Option Plan in accordance with the provisions of Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and related interpretations. As such, compensation expense is recorded only if the current market price of the stock on the date of the grant exceeds the exercise price. Pursuant to Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation (FASB 123), the Company discloses the pro forma effects of using pricing models (Minimum Value Method) for the stock-based compensation arrangements.

F-10



        The following table illustrates the effect on net income and earnings per share if the Company had applied the fair value recognition provisions of FASB 123, to employee stock-based awards (Note 11):

 
  December 31
 
 
  2001
  2002
  2003
 
Reported net loss   $ (582,712 ) $ (2,064,758 ) $ (1,839,242 )
Add stock-based compensation expense included in reported net loss     2,444,580     52,168     2,341,705  
Deduct total stock-based compensation expense determined under fair value method for all awards     (4,442,125 )   (2,485,225 )   (3,073,452 )
   
 
 
 
Pro forma net loss     (2,580,257 )   (4,497,815 )   (2,570,989 )
Plus preferred dividends     1,225,888     1,799,279     2,041,043  
   
 
 
 
Pro forma net loss applicable to common stock   $ (3,806,145 ) $ (6,297,094 ) $ (4,612,032 )
   
 
 
 

Pro forma basic and diluted net loss per share

 

$

(1.33

)

$

(1.94

)

$

(1.28

)
   
 
 
 

Income Taxes

        Deferred income taxes are recognized for all temporary differences between the tax and financial bases of the Company's assets and liabilities, using the enacted tax laws and statutory rates applicable to the periods in which the differences are expected to affect taxable income.

Foreign Currency Translation

        The assets and liabilities of the Company's foreign operations, which commenced in 2003, are translated into U.S. dollars at current exchange rates. Revenue and expense accounts of these operations are translated at average exchange rates prevailing during the year. Translation adjustments are accumulated in a separate component of stockholders' equity.

        Foreign currency transaction gains and losses are included in determining net income for the year in which the exchange rate changes.

Comprehensive Loss

        The Company reports comprehensive loss in accordance with the provisions of FASB Statement No. 130, Reporting Comprehensive Income. Comprehensive loss, as defined, includes all changes in equity (net assets) during a period from nonowner sources.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

        FASB Statement No. 146, Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities (FASB 146), addresses financial accounting and reporting for costs associated with exit or disposal activities and nullifies EITF No. 94-3, Liability Recognition for Certain Employees Termination Benefits and Other Costs to Exit an Activity (Including Certain Costs Incurred in a Restructuring) (Issue 94-3). The principal difference between FASB 146 and Issue 94-3 relates to FASB 146's requirements for

F-11



recognition of a liability for a cost associated with an exit or disposal activity. FASB 146 requires that the cost associated with an exit or disposal activity be recognized when the liability is incurred. In addition, the FASB stated that an entity's commitment to a plan, by itself, does not create an obligation that meets the definition of a liability. Therefore, this Statement eliminates the definition and requirements for recognition of exit costs in Issue 94-3. This Statement also establishes that fair value is the objective for initial measurement of the liability. FASB 146 is effective for the Company on January 1, 2003 and may impact certain restructuring activities from that date forward.

        FASB Statement No. 148, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation—Transition and Disclosure (FASB 148), amends FASB Statement No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, to provide alternative methods of transition for an entity that voluntarily changes to the fair value-based method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation. It also amends the disclosure provisions of that Statement to require prominent disclosure about the effects on reported net income of an entity's accounting policy decisions with respect to stock-based employee compensation. Finally, this Statement amends APB Opinion No. 28, Interim Financial Reporting, to require disclosure about those effects in interim financial information. The Company has adopted the disclosure requirements of FASB 148. The provisions of the FASB were effective in 2002.

        In January 2003, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 46, Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities (FIN 46), in an effort to expand upon and strengthen existing accounting guidance that addresses when a company should include in its financial statements the assets, liabilities, and activities of variable interest entities, including special-purpose entities or off-balance sheet structures. The consolidation requirements of FIN 46 apply immediately to variable interest entities created after January 31, 2003. The consolidation requirements apply to older entities (formed or relationships established prior to January 31, 2003) in the first fiscal period ending after March 15, 2004. Certain of the disclosure requirements apply in all financial statements issued after January 31, 2003, regardless of when the variable interest entity was established. The Company believes the impact of FIN 46 on its financial position and results of operations will not be material, but the Company will continue to evaluate the impact of FIN 46.

        In May 2003, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 150, Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of both Liabilities and Equity (FASB 150). On November 5, 2003, the FASB agreed to defer indefinitely the application of the guidance in FASB 150 (recognition, measurement and disclosure requirements) to shares of nonpublic companies (as defined in FASB 150) that are deemed mandatorily redeemable because of an event certain to occur, such as death retirement of the holder, subject to certain exceptions. Additionally, the Board agreed to defer the effective date of FASB 150 to nonpublic entities that have issued shares that are mandatorily redeemable on a fixed date at a fixed principal amount to fiscal periods beginning after December 15, 2004. As a result of the characteristics of the Company's preferred stock, the Company believes the impact of adopting FASB 150 will not be material to the Company's financial statements.

        In December 2003, the SEC published Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 104, Revenue Recognition (SAB 104). This SAB 104 updates portions of the SEC staff's interpretive guidance provided in SAB No. 101, Revenue Recognition in Financial Statements, and included in Topic 13 of the Codification of Staff Accounting Bulletins. SAB 104 deletes interpretive material no longer necessary, and conforms the interpretive material retained, because of pronouncements issued by the FASB's EITF on various

F-12



revenue recognition topics, including EITF 00-21, Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables. SAB 104 also incorporates into the SAB Codification certain sections of the SEC staff's Revenue Recognition in Financial Statements—Frequently Asked Questions and Answers. SAB 104 did not have a material impact on the Company's financial position and results of operations since the Company's revenue recognition practices previously conformed to the interpretations codified by SAB 104.

3. Accounts Receivable

        Accounts receivable consist of the following:

 
  December 31
 
 
  2002
  2003
 
Billed receivables   $ 6,166,596   $ 6,230,384  
Unbilled receivables     1,099,637     723,747  
   
 
 
Total receivables     7,266,233     6,954,131  
Allowance for doubtful accounts     (63,000 )   (224,170 )
   
 
 
Net receivables   $ 7,203,233   $ 6,729,961  
   
 
 

        Unbilled receivables represent recorded revenue that is billable by the Company at future dates based on contractual payment terms and is anticipated to be billed and collected within the twelve months following the balance sheet date.

        The Company's current sales terms typically provide for customer payment of 30% on order placement, 60% on shipment, and 10% on customer acceptance, which by the terms of the Company's sales agreements generally occurs within 30 days after installation.

        Activity in the allowance for doubtful accounts is as follows:

Balance, December 31, 2000   $ 131,917  
  Net charge to expense     (68,930 )
  Amounts written off     (19,749 )
   
 
Balance, December 31, 2001     43,238  
  Net charge to expense     86,911  
  Amounts written off     (67,149 )
   
 
Balance, December 31, 2002     63,000  
  Net charge to expense     376,000  
  Amounts written off     (214,830 )
   
 
Balance, December 31, 2003   $ 224,170  
   
 

        On May 22, 2003, the Company made a loan of $292,872 to a Board member of the Company. The loan bears interest at a rate of prime plus 1/2%. Payment on this loan is due two years from the date of issuance or upon redemption of the Series C redeemable preferred stock. The outstanding balance has been included as a noncurrent related party receivable at December 31, 2003. The

F-13



Company intends to forgive this loan immediately prior to the proposed business combination (Note 15).

4. Med-Tec Acquisition Deposit

        In connection with the Company's attempt to acquire all the outstanding stock of Med-Tec Iowa, Inc. (Med-Tec) during 1998 and 1999, the Company paid $2,000,000 and $1,000,000, respectively, to Med-Tec as a deposit towards the acquisition in accordance with the terms of the acquisition agreement.

        During March 1999, Med-Tec refused to proceed with the acquisition. On March 22, 1999, the Company commenced a civil action to recover damages it incurred when Med-Tec refused to proceed with the acquisition. The damages claimed by the Company include the cash deposits paid totaling $3,000,000 and expenses incurred in performing its obligation under the acquisition agreement. Thereafter, Med-Tec commenced an action seeking a declaration judgment that it is not obligated to return the cash deposits totaling $3,000,000.

        As of December 31, 1999, management of the Company believed that the $3,000,000 was recoverable. However, during 2000, based upon the status of negotiations and litigation process, management concluded that realization of this asset was no longer probable and provided an allowance of $3,000,000.

        On February 12, 2003, the Company received a final settlement from Med-Tec in the amount of $1,250,000. The Company recorded this as other income during 2003.

5. Property and Equipment

        Property and equipment are as follows:

 
  December 31
 
 
  2002
  2003
 
Equipment, primarily computers   $ 2,534,356   $ 2,911,074  
Furniture and fixtures     339,726     990,742  
Leasehold improvements     234,348     424,345  
Research equipment     295,951     342,684  
Other     449,789     496,707  
   
 
 
      3,854,170     5,165,552  
Less accumulated depreciation     (2,990,836 )   (3,640,914 )
   
 
 
    $ 863,334   $ 1,524,638  
   
 
 

        Depreciation expense for the years ended December 31, 2001, 2002, and 2003 was approximately $223,000, $509,000, and $650,000, respectively.

F-14



6. Lines of Credit and Related Party Debt

        As of December 31, 2000, the Company had a line of credit in the amount of $14,000,000 from Citicorp Private Bank. Additionally, during 2000, the Company borrowed $3,750,000 directly from a significant shareholder and his family. In association with the shareholder loans, the Company paid a 5% fee to the shareholder's family ($395,000) with preferred stock (40,102 shares).

        On December 31, 2000, the aforementioned shareholder group (note holders) refinanced the entire line of credit with a note payable to this ownership group. The principal and accrued interest at December 31, 2000 was $17,750,000 and $522,910, respectively.

        On March 5, 2001, the note holders converted the unpaid principal balance of the notes totaling $17,750,000 and accrued interest totaling $588,200 into 1,861,746 shares of Series B convertible preferred stock.

        Interest expense on the aforementioned debt instruments during the years ended December 31, 2000 and 2001 was $1,997,396 and $65,290, respectively.

        On November 21, 2002, the Company secured a $2,000,000 line of credit with National City Bank of Pennsylvania. As of December 31, 2003, no amount was borrowed under this line of credit. This line of credit expired in February of 2004 and has not yet been renewed.

7. Operating Leases and Other Commitments

        The Company leases office and manufacturing space located in Cranberry Township and Sewickley, Pennsylvania; both are suburbs of Pittsburgh. Additionally, the Company has other property and equipment leases. Future minimum lease payments under noncancelable lease arrangements at December 31, 2003 are as follows:

2004   $ 771,219
2005     499,290
2006     488,026
2007     488,026
2008     517,075
Thereafter     2,178,688
   
    $ 4,942,324
   

        Lease expense, exclusive of restructuring amounts set forth in Note 14, for 2001, 2002, and 2003 was approximately $636,000, $646,000, and $717,000, respectively.

        The Company has royalty arrangements for technologies that are licensed for use in some of the Company's products. These arrangements typically require the Company to pay either a percentage of the sales price for each product sold or an established dollar amount for each product. These royalty payments were not material for the years ended December 31, 2001, 2002, and 2003. There are noncancelable future commitments under these royalty arrangements after December 31, 2003. The Company believes such commitments will not be material to their financial position and results of operations.

F-15



8. Income Taxes

        The reconciliations of the effective income tax rates to the United States federal statutory tax rate follow:

 
  Years ended December 31
 
 
  2001
  2002
  2003
 
Statutory federal income tax rate   $ (203,949 ) $ (722,665 ) $ (686,394 )
State rate, net of federal benefit     (23,308 )   (82,590 )   (78,445 )
Tax credits     (152,500 )   (343,646 )   (322,013 )
Nondeductible items     69,320     220,026     199,402  
Nondeductible stock compensation     660,642     (136,631 )   913,265  
Change in valuation reserve     (350,205 )   1,065,506     (25,815 )
   
 
 
 
    $   $   $  
   
 
 
 

        FASB No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes, requires a valuation allowance to be recorded when it is more likely than not that deferred tax assets will not be realized. At December 31, 2003, a valuation allowance for the full amount of the net deferred tax asset was recorded because of uncertainties as to the amount of taxable income that would be generated in future years.

        As of December 31, 2003, the Company had net federal operating loss carryforwards and federal research tax credit carryforwards available to offset future federal taxable income with expiration dates as follows:

 
  Net Operating
Losses

  Federal
Research Tax
Credit

2007-2012   $ 29,788,000   $ 815,000
2013-2017        
2018-2023     28,465,000     1,782,000
   
 
    $ 58,253,000   $ 2,597,000
   
 

        In accordance with the provisions of Internal Revenue Code Section 382, utilization of the Company's net operating loss carryforward is estimated to be limited in a range of $1.4 million to $3.2 million per year without consideration of the proposed business combination (Note 15). The net operating loss carryforward expires in varying amounts from 2007 through 2023. In addition, the utilization of the Company's research and development credit is also limited in its use.

F-16



        The components of the Company's deferred tax assets are as follows:

 
  December 31
 
 
  2002
  2003
 
Deferred tax assets (liabilities):              
  Net operating losses   $ 21,360,000   $ 22,247,000  
  Tax credit carryforwards     2,426,000     2,597,000  
  Financial reserves/accruals     1,686,000     509,000  
  Inventory     917,000     971,000  
  Accrued vacation     82,000     64,000  
  Depreciation and amortization     121,000     247,000  
  Unearned service revenue     (1,089,000 )   (666,000 )
   
 
 
Total net current deferred tax assets     25,503,000     25,969,000  
Less valuation allowance     (25,503,000 )   (25,969,000 )
   
 
 
Net deferred tax assets   $   $  
   
 
 

        The Company's total state operating loss carryforwards are $46.5 million, expiring in various years beginning in 2005 and ending in 2023.

9. Warranty Reserve

        In connection with the sale of hardware products, the Company records a warranty reserve based on historical experience of cost incurred.

        Activity in the warranty reserve is as follows:

Balance, December 31, 2000   $ 89,100  
  Net charge to expense     391,457  
  Actual costs     (186,156 )
   
 
Balance, December 31, 2001     294,401  
  Net charge to expense     490,001  
  Actual costs     (377,086 )
   
 
Balance, December 31, 2002     407,316  
  Net charge to expense     464,874  
  Actual costs     (449,411 )
   
 
Balance, December 31, 2003   $ 422,779  
   
 

10. Capitalization

        On June 3, 2002, the Board of Directors approved a 1-for-1.97 reverse stock split on the Company's common and preferred stock. The stock split was effective on June 19, 2002. Accordingly, all common and preferred share and per-share data for all periods presented have been restated to reflect this event.

F-17



Common Stock

        As of December 31, 2003, the Company has 6,443,921 common stock shares reserved for future issuance of stock options, conversion of preferred stock, and warrants.

        During 2001, a significant Company shareholder entered into a put agreement with an individual service provider. The three-year agreement gives the right to put 177,665 common shares to the significant shareholder at a price of $9.43 per share. Compensation expense related to this arrangement was $658,453, $749,568, and $71,649 for fiscal years ended December 31, 2001, 2002, and 2003, respectively.

Series A Preferred Stock

        On August 4, 1999, August 17, 1999, and September 28, 1999, the Company held a first, second, and third closing on a Private Placement Memorandum (the Offering) for the sale of up to 507,614 shares of convertible preferred stock at $19.70 per share. Each share of preferred stock is convertible into 1.3605 shares of common stock of NOMOS Corporation. In addition, each investor received with each share of preferred stock a warrant to purchase one share of NOMOS Corporation common stock from a significant shareholder of the Company at an option price of one cent per share. On August 4, 1999, August 17, 1999, and September 28, 1999, the Company issued 142,843, 14,139, and 177,664 preferred shares, respectively. In addition, the September 28, 1999 holder of preferred stock was granted an additional 50,761 warrants for a total of 228,425. All of the warrants that had not been exercised expired in August 2001. As of December 31, 1999 and 2000, 334,646 of preferred shares were issued and 385,407 warrants were granted in conjunction with this offering. Of the 385,407 warrants, 382,870 had been exercised as of December 31, 2001. The remaining 2,537 warrants were forfeited. The estimated fair market value of warrants to purchase common stock from a significant shareholder of the Company of $3,788,672 was calculated using the Black-Scholes value pricing model with the following assumptions: volatility of 41%, dividend yield of 0.0%, assumed forfeiture of 0.0%, an expected life of one year, and an average risk-free interest rate of 5.40%.

        Each share of Series A stock is convertible at any time at the option of the holder into approximately 1.3605 shares of common stock (subject to future weighted average antidilution adjustment and adjustments for stock dividends, stock splits, and combinations). In addition, the Series A stock will automatically be converted into common stock upon the closing of a qualified initial public offering, as defined by the Certificate of Incorporation.

Series B Preferred Stock

        On March 5, 2001, the Company issued 1,861,746 shares of Series B stock at $9.85 per share for net proceeds of $18,298,259 in connection with the conversion of notes payable to shareholders (see Note 6 for further explanation).

        Each share of Series B stock is convertible at any time at the option of the holder into one share of common stock (subject to weighted average antidilution adjustment and adjustments for stock dividends, stock splits, and combinations). In addition, the Series B stock will automatically be converted into common stock upon the closing of a qualified initial public offering, as defined by the Certificate of Incorporation.

F-18



Series C Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock

        On March 2, 2001 and March 27, 2001, the Company issued 852,792 and 483,354 shares, respectively, at $3.518 per share, of Series C stock for net proceeds of $4,636,195 in connection with the issuance.

        The holders of Series C are entitled to receive a cumulative cash dividend at the compounded rate of 10% per share per annum at $3.518. Such dividends shall accrue from the date of issue, whether or not earned or declared and whether or not in any fiscal year there shall be net profits or surplus available for the payment of dividends in such fiscal year.

        Each share of Series C stock is convertible at any time at the option of the holder into one share of common stock (subject to weighted average antidilution adjustment and adjustments for stock dividends, stock splits, and combinations). In addition, the Series C stock will automatically be converted into common stock upon the closing of a qualified initial public offering, as defined by the Certificate of Incorporation.

Redemption Put Rights, Voting Rights and Liquidation of Preferred Stock

        The holders of at least fifty percent (50%) of the outstanding Redeemable Convertible Preferred Series C stock may require the Company to redeem such stock at any time after the earlier to occur of (i) March 2, 2004, or (ii) the effective date of a consolidation or merger of the corporation with or into any other corporation or corporations that constitutes a disposition of the entire corporation, or a sale of all or substantially all of the assets of the corporation. In the event of any such put, the Company shall redeem the shares of Series C Preferred stock at a redemption price equal to $6.50 per share plus all dividends accrued or declared but unpaid. If electing holders elect a redemption pursuant to (i) above, the Company may elect in writing to defer the redemption of up to fifty percent (50%) of the Series C for a period of one year from the date of receipt of the holders' request. During 2002 and 2003, $1,799,279 and $2,041,043, respectively, was recognized as dividends through periodic accretion utilizing the interest method so that, at the redemption date, the carrying amount of the preferred stock will equal the redemption amount.

        During the ninety-day period immediately following March 2, 2004, the Company may elect to repurchase all, but not less than, all of the shares of the Series C at a redemption price equal to $7.74 per share plus all dividends accrued or declared but unpaid, by not giving less than thirty days prior written notice to the Preferred Series C holders.

        Subsequent to year-end, the Company entered a standstill agreement with certain of its holders of Series C preferred stock. Under terms of this agreement, the Company has agreed to pay to each holder of its Series C preferred stock, concurrently with the closing of the planned merger with North American Scientific, Inc., an amount of $0.15 per share of series C preferred stock. Total aggregate payment at closing will be $200,423. As part of this agreement, the Series C shareholders agreed not to exercise their redemption right until the earlier of July 1, 2004 or the termination of the merger agreement with North American Scientific, Inc.

F-19



        The holders of preferred stock vote on matters on an as-converted basis; i.e., each share of preferred stock carries the number of votes equal to the number of shares of common stock into which it is convertible.

        In the event of any liquidation, dissolution, or winding up of the Company, the holders of Preferred Series C stock shall be entitled to be paid first out of the assets of the Company, then the holders of Preferred Series A and Series B stock shall rank on parity before any distribution to the common stockholders.

11. Stock Options and Warrants

Stock Options

        Under the terms of the Company's 2001 Stock Option Plan (the Plan), grants of incentive and nonqualified stock options to employees and directors of the Company can be made for up to 3,553,299 shares of common stock. Options issued under the Plan expire ten years from date of grant, vest generally over a three- to six-year period, and are adjusted for pro rata stock splits or dividends. All grants of incentive stock options under the Plan are exercisable at prices that are at least 100% of the fair market value of the Company's common stock at the date of grant, as determined by the Board of Directors. The Plan provides that the payment for the shares must be in cash.

        Of the 1,933,984 stock options outstanding at December 31, 2003, the vesting of 362,245 stock options could be accelerated if (1) the fair market value of the Company's common stock reaches $59.10 per share, as evidenced by the first of the following events: (i) if the Company's common stock is publicly traded, when the average ten-day trading price equals or exceeds $59.10 per share; (ii) the Company's completion of an offering of its common stock priced at $59.10 or more per share, pursuant to which the Company raises at least $10 million; or (iii) an arm's-length sale of common stock by the Company (in which the Company raises at least $3,000,000) to investors at $59.10 or more per share that include an unaffiliated third party or parties; or (2) an acquisition of 50% or more of the common stock of the Company at a per share valuation of $30 or more by an unrelated entity or person.

F-20



        The following table summarizes option activity for common stock under the Plan:

 
  Options
Outstanding

  Range of
Exercise Price

  Weighted
Average
Exercise Price

Balance at December 31, 2000   2,118,180   $ .99-$19.70   $ .481
Activity for 2001:                
  Granted   402,030   $ .99-$3.94   $ 2.48
  Exercised   (605,161 ) $ .99   $ .99
  Forfeitures   (5,498 ) $ .99   $ .99
   
 
 
Balance at December 31, 2001   1,909,551   $ .99-$19.70   $ 5.54

Activity for 2002:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
  Granted   177,216   $ 1-$9.85   $ 3.76
  Exercised   (91,371 ) $ .99   $ .99
  Forfeitures   (75,111 ) $ .99-$3.94   $ 1.30
   
 
 
Balance at December 31, 2002   1,920,285   $ .99-$19.70   $ 5.76
   
 
 

Activity for 2003:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
  Granted   171,500   $ 1.00   $ 1.00
  Exercised   (94,222 ) $ .99-$1.00   $ .99
  Expired   (20,305 ) $ 9.85-$19.70   $ 14.77
  Forfeitures   (43,274 ) $ .99-$19.70   $ 4.24
   
 
 
Balance at December 31, 2003   1,933,984   $ .99-$19.70   $ 5.51
   
 
 

        The Company has elected to follow APB Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and related interpretations in accounting for its employee stock options. Under APB 25, during 2001, 2002, and 2003 because the exercise price of the Company's employee stock option grants equaled the market price of the underlying stock on the date of grant, no compensation expense was recognized. On November 19, 1999 and December 15, 2000, the Company repriced the exercise price of all outstanding stock options from $19.70 to $9.85 and then to $.99 per share. The repricing of these options results in variable treatment of these grants. Changes in the fair value of the Company's stock through the exercise date (or expiration) of the option results in compensation expense to the extent that the exercise price is exceeded by the fair value of the Company's common stock. This compensation expense is allocated over the remaining vesting period of the options. During 2001, $1,786,127 was recorded as compensation expense because the fair value of the stock was determined to be in excess of the exercise price. As of December 31, 2002, the fair market value of the Company's stock declined to an amount that approximated the exercise price of the repriced options. As a result, the Company reversed compensation expense in the amount of $(697,400) during 2002. During 2002, the Company granted 29,500 options at an exercise price of $9.85 per share, which were repriced with an exercise price of $1.00 per share. This repricing resulted in variable treatment of these options. During 2002, the Company recorded no compensation expense because the fair value of the Company's stock equaled the exercise price as of December 31, 2002. During 2003, the Company recorded compensation expense of $83,600 as the fair value of the Company's stock exceeded the exercise price.

F-21



        During 2003, the fair value of the Company's stock increased to $8.36 per share and as a result the Company recorded compensation expense of $2,250,615 related to the variable options. In addition, the Company issued 171,500 options at $1.00 per share based upon the Board established fair value. Subsequent to the issuance of these options, the Company announced a planned merger with North American Scientific, Inc. (NASI) as described in Note 15. Accordingly, the Company has utilized the estimated fair value of the common stock based upon the terms of the merger agreement. The excess of this fair value over the $1.00 per share is being recognized as additional compensation expense over the vesting period. As of December 31, 2003, the Company recognized $19,441 of compensation expense related to the 2003 options granted.

        The weighted average remaining contractual life of the options at December 31, 2003 was approximately seven years. The weighted average fair value of options granted during the year ended December 31, 2003 was approximately $4.61 per option. As of December 31, 2003, 1,131,749 options were vested.

        The fair value for the options described in footnote 2 was estimated at the date of grant using the FASB Minimum Value Method option pricing model with the following assumptions for 2001, 2002 and 2003: dividend yield of 0%, risk-free interest rate of 3.6%, 3.46%, and 1.93%, respectively, and an expected life of three years.

Warrants Issued by the Company

 
  Warrants
   
 
  Exercise
Price

 
  Issued
  Outstanding
Balance at December 31, 2000 and 2001   140,783   140,783   $ .99-$29.55

Activity for 2002:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
  Issued        
  Exercised   (34,903 ) (34,903 ) $ 9.85
  Expired   (50,761 ) (50,761 ) $ 19.70-$29.55
   
 
 
Balance at December 31, 2002   55,119   55,119   $ .99-$19.70

Activity for 2003:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
  Issued        
  Exercised   (5,117 ) (5,117 ) $ .99
  Expired   (12,953 ) (12,953 ) $ .99-$19.70
   
 
 
Balance at December 31, 2003   37,049   37,049   $ .99-$19.70
   
 
 

        The warrants included in the above presentation were granted to various brokerage firms in connection with the private placement of the Company's securities. Using the Black-Scholes pricing model with the following assumptions: volatility of 25%; dividend yield of 0.0%, expected life of two years, and an average risk-free interest rate of 5.8%, the values of all the warrants were $612,664. The value of the warrants was classified within paid-in capital as transaction cost related to the equity capital raised by the Company. During 2002, 34,903 warrants exercised were valued at $150,432. The

F-22



34,903 warrants were exercised using the cashless feature within the warrant agreement; consequently, 31,412 common shares were issued. During 2003, 5,117 warrants were exercised for approximately $5,000. The warrants expire in varying amounts from 2003 through 2004. All the warrants outstanding as of December 31, 2003 have antidilution rights with respect to the warrants' exercise price.

12. Net Loss Per Share

        The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share:

 
  Years ended December 31
 
 
  2001
  2002
  2003
 
Numerator:                    
  Net loss   $ (582,712 ) $ (2,064,758 ) $ (1,839,242 )
  Plus preferred dividends     (1,225,888 )   (1,799,279 )   (2,041,043 )
   
 
 
 
  Numerator for basic and diluted earnings per share—net loss applicable to common stock     (1,808,600 )   (3,864,037 )   (3,880,285 )
Denominator:                    
  Denominator for basic and diluted earnings per share—weighted average shares     2,856,444     3,240,072     3,615,966  
   
 
 
 
Net loss per share—basic and diluted   $ (0.63 ) $ (1.19 ) $ (1.07 )
   
 
 
 

13. Employee Benefit Plan

        The Company has a Section 401(k) Savings Plan (the Plan) that allows employees to contribute up to 15% of their annual compensation, subject to statutory limitations. Company contributions to the Plan are discretionary. During 2001, 2002, and 2003, the Company recorded approximately $93,000, $133,000, and $133,000, respectively, in expense for contributions to the Plan.

14. Offering, Relocation and Merger Costs

        The Company recorded charges in the amount of $2,507,205 during 2002 for lease and initial public offering costs. In 2002, management of the Company decided to relocate its headquarters and operating facilities from Sewickley, Pennsylvania to Cranberry Township, Pennsylvania. During 2002, the Company recorded a $782,281 charge related to the unutilized Sewickley facility. The Sewickley facility has been vacated, and the Company has been unsuccessful in its attempt to sublease the facility. This charge relates to the remaining monthly lease payments over the lease term, which expires in August 2004.

        Also, during 2002, the Company recorded a charge in the amount of $1,724,924 for costs associated with the Company's unsuccessful attempt of its initial public offering during the second quarter of 2002.

        During 2003, the Company announced a Plan of Merger with North American Scientific, Inc. as discussed in Note 15. The Company has recorded a charge of $610,000 to recognize professional fees related to the merger and incurred through December 31, 2003.

F-23



15. Proposed Business Combination

        On October 27, 2003, the Company and North American Scientific, Inc. announced the signing of an agreement and Plan of Merger, dated October 26, 2003. The merger requires shareholder approval, which will be voted on subsequent to the filing of a joint proxy/registration statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The accompanying financial statements have been prepared on an historic basis and do not give effect to the aforementioned proposed business combination. In conjunction with the proposed merger, the Company is obligated to pay (approximately $1.3 million) for investment banking services directly related to the transaction that are contingent upon closing. In a prior year, the Company engaged the services of a regional investment banking firm and after a period of time the relationship was terminated. In conjunction with the current transaction, this second firm has filed suit on or about March 1, 2004 against the Company asserting that the terms of the previous engagement letter require a fee payable to this firm of approximately $2.3 million which is also contingent upon the closing of the business combination. Management does not believe there is any obligation to pay these fees and will vigorously defend any claim that may be filed.

16. Legal Proceedings

        On December 28, 1998, the Company filed a complaint against BrainLAB in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware for infringement on its BAT patent. In the complaint, the Company requested a court order prohibiting the further infringement of its patent and damages in an amount to be determined. In January 2003, the district court entered judgment against the Company on its infringement claims. The defendants filed a post-trial motion in the district court seeking the reimbursement from the Company of their attorneys' fees related to the district court trial, which they allege are in excess of $400,000. The district court denied the motion, without prejudice, in view of our appeal. The Company appealed this judgment to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. In February 2004, the circuit court upheld the district court's judgment and the Company filed a petition for rehearing in the circuit court. The filing of the petition for rehearing will delay the district court's reconsideration of the BrainLAB's motion for reimbursement of its legal expenses. Management cannot currently determine the likelihood of an unfavorable outcome related to BrainLAB's motion, however, the Company will vigorously defend itself against this claim.

F-24



Annex A-1



AGREEMENT AND PLAN OF MERGER

by and among

NOMOS CORPORATION,

NORTH AMERICAN SCIENTIFIC, INC.

AND

AM CAPITAL I, INC.


Dated as of October 26, 2003






TABLE OF CONTENTS

ARTICLE I    THE MERGER   A-1
  1.1   The Merger   A-1
  1.2   The Closing   A-1
  1.3   Effective Time   A-2
  1.4   Effect of Merger   A-2
  1.5   Tax Consequences   A-2

ARTICLE II    THE SURVIVING CORPORATION

 

A-2
  2.1   Certificate of Incorporation   A-2
  2.2   Bylaws   A-2
  2.3   Director   A-2
  2.4   Officers   A-2

ARTICLE III    EFFECT OF THE MERGER ON SECURITIES OF MERGER SUB AND THE COMPANY

 

A-2
  3.1   Merger Sub Capital Stock   A-2
  3.2   Company Securities.   A-3
  3.3   Exchange of Certificates Evidencing Company Common Stock and Company Preferred Stock   A-5
  3.4   Dissenter's Rights   A-6
  3.5   Adjustment of Exchange Ratio   A-7
  3.6   Indemnification Escrow Agreement   A-7
  3.7   Appointment of Stockholder Representative   A-7

ARTICLE IV    REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES OF ACQUIROR

 

A-8
  4.1   Organization and Qualification   A-8
  4.2   Capitalization   A-8
  4.3   Subsidiaries   A-9
  4.4   Power and Authority; Non-contravention; Government Approvals   A-9
  4.5   Reports and Financial Statements; Information Provided   A-10
  4.6   Absence of Undisclosed Liabilities   A-11
  4.7   Absence of Certain Changes or Events   A-12
  4.8   Litigation   A-12
  4.9   No Violation of Law; Licenses, Permits and Registrations   A-12
  4.10   Taxes   A-12
  4.11   Labor and Employment Matters   A-13
  4.12   Compliance With Environmental Laws.   A-13
  4.13   Good Title to and Condition of Assets   A-15
  4.14   Insurance   A-15
  4.15   Affiliated Transactions   A-15
  4.16   Material Contracts   A-15
  4.17   Intellectual Property.   A-15
  4.18   Brokers and Finders   A-17
  4.19   Opinion of Financial Advisor   A-17

ARTICLE V    REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES OF THE COMPANY

 

A-17
  5.1   Organization and Qualification   A-18
  5.2   Capitalization   A-18
  5.3   Subsidiaries   A-19
  5.4   Power and Authority; Non-contravention; Government Approvals   A-19
  5.5   Financial Statements; Information Provided   A-20
         

i


  5.6   Absence of Undisclosed Liabilities   A-21
  5.7   Absence of Certain Changes or Events   A-22
  5.8   Litigation   A-22
  5.9   No Violation of Law; Licenses, Permits and Registrations   A-22
  5.10   Taxes   A-23
  5.11   Labor and Employment Matters   A-23
  5.12   Employee Benefit Plans   A-24
  5.13   Compliance With Environmental Laws.   A-25
  5.14   Real Estate   A-26
  5.15   Good Title to and Condition of Assets   A-26
  5.16   Insurance   A-26
  5.17   Relationships with Customers and Suppliers; Affiliated Transactions   A-27
  5.18   Bank Accounts; Business Locations   A-27
  5.19   Names; Prior Acquisitions   A-27
  5.20   Material Contracts.   A-27
  5.21   Brokers and Finders   A-29
  5.22   Opinion of Financial Advisor   A-29
  5.23   Intellectual Property.   A-29
  5.24   Records of the Company   A-31
  5.25   Accuracy of Information Furnished by Company   A-31

ARTICLE VI    CONDUCT OF BUSINESS PENDING THE MERGER

 

A-31
  6.1   Conduct of Business Pending the Merger   A-31
  6.2   Control of Acquiror's Operations   A-32
  6.3   Control of Company's Operations   A-32

ARTICLE VII    ADDITIONAL AGREEMENTS

 

A-32
  7.1   Access to Information   A-32
  7.2   Affiliate Letter   A-33
  7.3   No Solicitation.   A-33
  7.4   Joint Proxy Statement/Prospectus; Registration Statement.   A-36
  7.5   All Reasonable Efforts; Agreement to Cooperate   A-36
  7.6   Public Statements   A-37
  7.7   Notification of Certain Matters   A-37
  7.8   Approval of Stockholders   A-37
  7.9   Section 16 Matters   A-38
  7.10   368(a) Reorganization   A-38
  7.11   Nasdaq National Market Listing   A-39
  7.12   Stockholder Litigation   A-39
  7.13   Indemnification.   A-39
  7.14   Acquiror Board   A-39
  7.15   Employee Benefits; Termination of Pension Plan.   A-40
  7.16   Rights Agreement Amendment   A-40
  7.17   Voting Agreement   A-40
  7.18   Lock-up Agreements   A-40
  7.19   Addresses for Option Holders   A-41

ARTICLE VIII    CONDITIONS

 

A-41
  8.1   Conditions to Each Party's Obligation to Effect the Merger   A-41
  8.2   Conditions to Obligation of the Company to Effect the Merger   A-41
  8.3   Conditions to Obligation of Acquiror and Merger Sub to Effect the Merger   A-42
         

ii



ARTICLE IX    TERMINATION; FEES AND EXPENSES

 

A-43
  9.1   Termination by Mutual Consent   A-43
  9.2   Termination by Acquiror or the Company   A-44
  9.3   Termination by the Company   A-44
  9.4   Termination by Acquiror   A-44
  9.5   Effect of Termination and Abandonment   A-44
  9.6   Fees and Expenses.   A-44

ARTICLE X    AMENDMENT AND WAIVER

 

A-45
  10.1   Amendment   A-45
  10.2   Waiver   A-46

ARTICLE XI    DEFINITIONS

 

A-46

ARTICLE XII    INDEMNIFICATION

 

A-48
  12.1   Indemnification of Acquiror Indemnified Parties   A-48
  12.2   Defense of Third-Party Claims   A-48
  12.3   Direct Claims   A-49
  12.4   Limitations on Liability   A-49

ARTICLE XIII    GENERAL PROVISIONS

 

A-50
  13.1   Survival of Representations and Warranties after the Effective Time   A-50
  13.2   Notices   A-50
  13.3   Interpretation   A-51
  13.4   Entire Agreement   A-51
  13.5   Governing Law   A-51
  13.6   Waiver of Jury Trial   A-51
  13.7   Counterparts   A-52
  13.8   Parties in Interest   A-52
  13.9   Severability   A-52
  13.10   Equitable Relief   A-52

iii



AGREEMENT AND PLAN OF MERGER

        This AGREEMENT AND PLAN OF MERGER, dated as of October 26, 2003 (this "Agreement"), is made and entered into by and among NOMOS Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), North American Scientific, Inc., a Delaware corporation ("Acquiror"), and AM Capital I, Inc., a Delaware corporation and wholly-owned subsidiary of Acquiror ("Merger Sub"). Certain capitalized terms used herein are defined in Article XI hereof.

W I T N E S S E T H:

        WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of Acquiror (the "Acquiror Board") has determined that a business combination between Acquiror and the Company, upon the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in this Agreement, is advisable and in the best interests of Acquiror and its stockholders;

        WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Company (the "Company Board") has determined that a business combination between the Company and Acquiror, upon the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in this Agreement, is advisable and in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders;

        WHEREAS, Acquiror and the Company intend that the merger provided for herein qualify as a reorganization under the provisions of Section 368(a)(2)(d) of the Code for federal income tax purposes;

        WHEREAS, the Acquiror Board has, by duly adopted resolutions, approved this Agreement and the transactions contemplated hereby; and

        WHEREAS, the Company Board has, by duly adopted resolutions, approved this Agreement and the transactions contemplated hereby;

        NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the representations, warranties, covenants and agreements contained herein, the parties hereto, intending to be legally bound, hereby agree as follows:


ARTICLE I

THE MERGER

        1.1    The Merger.    At the Effective Time (as defined in Section 1.3 hereof), upon the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in this Agreement and in accordance with the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware (the "DGCL"), the Company shall be merged with and into Merger Sub, the separate existence of the Company shall thereupon cease and Merger Sub shall continue as the surviving corporation and as a wholly owned subsidiary of the Acquiror (the "Merger"). Merger Sub shall be the surviving corporation in the Merger and is hereinafter sometimes referred to as the "Surviving Corporation."

        1.2    The Closing.    Subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement, the consummation of the Merger (the "Closing") shall take place (a) at the offices of McDermott, Will & Emery, 2049 Century Park East, 34th Floor, Los Angeles, California 90067, at 10:00 a.m., local time, as promptly as practicable (and in any event no later than the third business day) after the satisfaction or waiver of all the conditions set forth in Article VIII hereof (other than delivery of items to be delivered at the Closing and other than satisfaction of those conditions that by their nature are to be satisfied at the Closing, it being understood that the occurrence of the Closing shall remain subject to the delivery of such items and the satisfaction or waiver of such conditions at the Closing) or (b) at such other time, date or place as Acquiror and the Company may agree. The date on which the Closing occurs is hereinafter referred to as the "Closing Date."

A-1



        1.3    Effective Time.    As promptly as practicable after all the conditions to the Merger set forth in Article VIII hereof shall have been satisfied or waived in accordance herewith and provided that this Agreement shall not have been terminated pursuant to Article IX hereof, the parties hereto shall cause a Certificate of Merger (the "Certificate of Merger") meeting the requirements of Section 251 of the DGCL to be properly executed and filed in accordance with such Section on the Closing Date. The Merger shall become effective at the time of filing of the Certificate of Merger with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware in accordance with the DGCL or at such later time which the parties hereto shall have agreed upon and designated in the Certificate of Merger as the effective time of the Merger (the "Effective Time").

        1.4    Effect of Merger.    At the Effective Time, the effect of the Merger shall be as provided in this Agreement, the Certificate of Merger and the applicable provisions of the DGCL. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, and subject thereto, at the Effective Time, all the property, rights, privileges, powers and franchises of the Company shall vest in the Surviving Corporation and all debts, liabilities and duties of the Company shall become the debts, liabilities and duties of the Surviving Corporation.

        1.5    Tax Consequences.    The parties hereto intend that the Merger shall constitute a reorganization within the meaning of Section 368(a)(2)(d) of the Code. The parties hereto adopt this Agreement as a "plan of reorganization" within the meaning of Sections 1.368-2(g) and 1.368-3(a) of the U.S. Income Tax Regulations.


ARTICLE II

THE SURVIVING CORPORATION

        2.1    Certificate of Incorporation.    The Certificate of Incorporation of the Merger Sub as in effect immediately prior to the Effective Time shall be the Certificate of Incorporation of the Surviving Corporation after the Effective Time until duly amended in accordance with applicable law; provided, however, that Article I of the Certificate of Incorporation of the Surviving Corporation shall be amended to read as follows: "The name of the corporation is NOMOS Corporation."

        2.2    Bylaws.    The Bylaws of the Merger Sub as in effect immediately prior to the Effective Time shall be the Bylaws of the Surviving Corporation after the Effective Time until duly amended in accordance with applicable law.

        2.3    Director.    At the Effective Time, L. Michael Cutrer shall be the sole director of the Surviving Corporation and shall serve in accordance with the Bylaws of the Surviving Corporation until his successor is duly elected or appointed and qualified.

        2.4    Officers.    The officers of the Company in office immediately prior to the Effective Time shall be the officers of the Surviving Corporation after the Effective Time, and such officers shall serve in accordance with the Bylaws of the Surviving Corporation until their respective successors are duly elected or appointed and qualified.


ARTICLE III

EFFECT OF THE MERGER ON SECURITIES OF MERGER SUB AND THE COMPANY

        3.1    Merger Sub Capital Stock.    At the Effective Time, each share of common stock, par value $0.0001 per share, of Merger Sub issued and outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Time shall be converted into and exchanged for one validly issued, fully paid and non-assessable share of common stock, par value $0.0001 per share, of the Surviving Corporation.

A-2


        3.2    Company Securities.    

        (a)   Subject to Article IX hereof, at the Effective Time, each share of Common Stock, par value $0.0001 per share, of the Company (the "Company Common Stock") issued and outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Time (other than those shares held by any Dissenting Stockholder (as defined in Section 3.4 hereof), shall by virtue of the Merger and without any action on the part of the holder thereof be converted into the right to receive 0.891 shares (the "Exchange Ratio") of common stock, par value $0.01 per share, of the common stock of Acquiror (the "Acquiror Common Stock"). Each share of Acquiror Common Stock issued to holders of Company Common Stock in the Merger shall be issued together with one associated common stock purchase right (a "Right") in accordance with the Rights Agreement, dated as of October 14, 1998, between Acquiror and U.S. Stock Transfer Corporation, a California corporation, as Rights Agent (the "Rights Agreement"). References herein to the shares of Acquiror Common Stock issuable in the Merger shall be deemed to include such associated Rights.

        (b)   At the Effective Time:

        (c)   At the Effective Time, all shares of Company Common Stock and the Company Preferred Stock, as a result of the Merger and without any action on the part of the holder thereof, shall cease to be outstanding and shall be canceled and retired and shall cease to exist, and each holder of shares of Company Common Stock or Company Preferred Stock shall thereafter cease to have any rights with respect to such shares of Company Common Stock or Company Preferred Stock, as applicable, except the right to receive, without interest, Acquiror Common Stock and cash, as applicable in accordance with Section 3.2(a) and (b), hereof and cash in lieu of fractional shares of Acquiror Common Stock in accordance with Section 3.3(b) hereof upon the surrender of one or more stock certificates evidencing such shares of Company Common Stock or Company Preferred Stock, as applicable (each, a "Certificate").

        (d)   Each share of Company Common Stock and Company Preferred Stock issued and held in the Company's treasury at the Effective Time shall, by virtue of the Merger, cease to be outstanding and shall be canceled and retired without payment of any consideration therefor.

        (e)   At the Effective Time, each outstanding option to purchase Company Common Stock (each a "Company Option") issued pursuant to the Company's 1993 Stock Option Plan, 1999 Stock Option Plan and 2001 Stock Option Plan (each an "Employee Plan") and each outstanding option listed on Section 3.2(e) of the Company Disclosure Schedule (the "Off Plan Options") shall be converted into an option under an applicable stock option plan of Acquiror (a "Replacement Option"). The Replacement Option into which any Company Option is converted shall be exercisable for the number of shares of Acquiror Common Stock equal to the Exchange Ratio multiplied by the number of shares of Company Common Stock subject to such Company Option, rounded down to the nearest whole number of shares. The per share exercise price of the Replacement Option which any Company Option is

A-3



converted will equal the per share exercise price of such Company Option immediately prior to the Effective Time divided by the Exchange Ratio, rounded up to the nearest whole cent. No cash will be paid in lieu of fractional shares that are rounded down pursuant to this Section 3.2. No Replacement Options shall be issued with respect to Company Options that are canceled subsequent to the date of this Agreement and prior to the Effective Time. Notwithstanding anything in this Section 3.2 to the contrary, each Replacement Option shall contain such terms that are necessary for it to be a substitution for a new option in a transaction to which Section 424(a) of the Code applies. Following the Effective Time, upon surrender of the outstanding Company Options, Acquiror shall deliver to the holders of Options appropriate option agreements with respect to the Replacement Options.

        (f)    The term, exercisability, vesting schedule, status as an "incentive stock option" under Section 422 of the Code, if applicable and to the maximum extent permissible under applicable laws and regulations, and all other terms of each Replacement Option will be the same in all material respects as the corresponding Company Option, and all outstanding Company Options will be accelerated and vest immediately as a result of the Merger. Each Company Option shall be immediately extinguished after issuance of the corresponding Replacement Option by the Acquiror.

        (g)   As soon as practicable after the Effective Time, Acquiror shall deliver to each holder of an outstanding Company Option an appropriate notice setting forth such holder's rights pursuant hereto. Acquiror shall take all corporate action necessary to reserve for issuance a sufficient number of shares of Acquiror Common Stock for delivery upon exercise of Replacement Options issued in accordance with this Section 3.2. Promptly after the Effective Time, but in no event later than forty-five (45) days thereafter, Acquiror shall file one or more registration statements on Form S-8 (or any successor form) with respect to the shares of Acquiror Common Stock subject to such Replacement Options (to the extent such a registration statement is available for such options) and shall use commercially reasonable efforts to maintain the effectiveness of such registration statement or registration statements (and maintain the current status of the prospectus or prospectuses contained therein) for so long as such options remain outstanding.

        (h)   At the Effective Time, each outstanding warrant to purchase shares of Company Common Stock (a "Company Stock Warrant") shall by virtue of the Merger be assumed by Acquiror. Each Company Stock Warrant so assumed by Acquiror under this Agreement will continue to have, and be subject to, the same terms and conditions of such warrant immediately prior to the Effective Time, except that (i) each Company Stock Warrant will be exercisable for a number of shares of Acquiror Common Stock equal to that number of shares of Company Common Stock that were subject to such Company Stock Warrant immediately prior to the Effective Time multiplied by the Exchange Ratio, rounded down to the nearest whole number of shares of Acquiror Common Stock and (ii) the per share exercise price for the shares of Acquiror Common Stock issuable upon exercise of such assumed Company Stock Warrant will be equal to the quotient determined by dividing the exercise price per share of Company Common Stock at which such Company Stock Warrant was exercisable immediately prior to the Effective Time by the Exchange Ratio, rounded up to the nearest whole cent. No cash will be paid in lieu of fractional shares that are rounded down pursuant to this Section 3.2.

        (i)    As soon as practicable after the Effective Time, Acquiror shall deliver to each holder of an outstanding Company Stock Warrant an appropriate notice setting forth such holder's rights pursuant thereto and such Company Stock Warrant shall continue in effect on the same terms and conditions (subject to the adjustments required by this Section 3.2 after giving effect to the Merger). Acquiror shall take all corporate action necessary to reserve for issuance a sufficient number of shares of Acquiror Common Stock for delivery upon exercise of all Company Stock Warrants pursuant to the terms set forth in this Section 3.2.

A-4



        3.3    Exchange of Certificates Evidencing Company Common Stock and Company Preferred Stock.    

        (a)   As of the Effective Time, Acquiror shall deposit, or shall cause to be deposited, with Acquiror's transfer agent, or with such other party designated by Acquiror as is reasonably satisfactory to the Company (the "Exchange Agent"), for the benefit of the holders of shares of Company Common Stock and Company Preferred Stock for exchange in accordance with this Article III, certificates evidencing the shares of Acquiror Common Stock and cash payable in accordance with Section 3.2(b) hereof, as applicable, and cash in lieu of fractional shares in accordance with Section 3.3(b) hereof (such cash and certificates for shares of Acquiror Common Stock, together with any dividends or distributions with respect thereto (relating to record dates for such dividends or distributions after the Effective Time), being hereinafter referred to as the "Exchange Fund") to be issued pursuant to Section 3.2 hereof and paid pursuant to this Section 3.3 in exchange for outstanding shares of Company Common Stock and Company Preferred Stock.

        (b)   Promptly after the Effective Time, Acquiror shall cause the Exchange Agent to mail to each holder of record of shares of Company Common Stock and Company Preferred Stock (i) a letter of transmittal which shall specify that delivery of such shares of Company Common Stock or Company Preferred Stock shall be effected, and risk of loss regarding and title to such shares of Company Common Stock or Company Preferred Stock, as the case may be, shall pass, only upon delivery of the Certificates evidencing such shares to the Exchange Agent and (ii) instructions for use in effecting the surrender of such Certificates in exchange for certificates evidencing shares of Acquiror Common Stock and cash payable in accordance with Section 3.2(b) hereof, as applicable, and cash in lieu of fractional shares. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement to the contrary, each holder of shares of Company Common Stock converted pursuant to the Merger that would otherwise have been entitled to receive a fraction of a share of Acquiror Common Stock (after taking into account all Certificates delivered by such holder and the aggregate number of shares of Company Common Stock represented thereby) shall, upon surrender of such holder's Certificates, receive, in lieu of such fraction of a share, cash (without interest) in an amount equal to such fractional part of a share of Acquiror Common Stock multiplied by the average of the last reported sales prices of shares of Acquiror Common Stock at the end of regular trading hours on the Nasdaq National Market ("Nasdaq") during the ten (10) consecutive trading days ending on and including the last trading day prior to the Effective Time. Upon surrender of a Certificate for cancellation to the Exchange Agent, together with such duly executed letter of transmittal, the holder of the shares evidenced by such Certificate shall be entitled to receive in exchange therefor a certificate evidencing that number of whole shares of Acquiror Common Stock and a check representing the amount of cash payable in accordance with Section 3.2(b) hereof, as applicable, and cash in lieu of fractional shares, if any, which such holder has the right to receive in respect of the Certificate so surrendered pursuant to the provisions of this Article III (after giving effect to any required withholding tax) and the shares evidenced by the Certificate so surrendered shall forthwith be canceled. No interest will be paid or accrued on cash in lieu of fractional shares payable to holders of shares of Company Common Stock or Company Preferred Stock. In the event of a transfer of ownership of Company Common Stock or Company Preferred Stock which is not registered in the transfer records of the Company, a certificate evidencing the proper number of shares of Acquiror Common Stock, together with a check for the cash payable in accordance with Section 3.2(b), if any, and cash to be paid in lieu of fractional shares, may be issued to the transferee thereof if the Certificate evidencing such Company Common Stock or Company Preferred Stock, as the case may be, is presented to the Exchange Agent accompanied by all documents required to evidence and effect such transfer and to evidence that any applicable stock transfer taxes have been paid.

        (c)   Dividends and other distributions declared after the Effective Time on Acquiror Common Stock issued hereunder shall be paid to the holder surrendering a Certificate as contemplated hereby; provided, however, that no such dividends or other distributions so declared shall be paid in respect of any shares of Company Common Stock or Company Preferred Stock evidenced by a Certificate until

A-5



such Certificate is surrendered for exchange as provided herein. Subject to the effect of applicable laws, following surrender of any such Certificate, there shall be paid to the holder of the certificates evidencing whole shares of Acquiror Common Stock issued in exchange therefor, without interest at the time of such surrender, the amount of dividends or other distributions with a record date after the Effective Time theretofore payable with respect to such whole shares of Acquiror Common Stock and not yet paid, less the amount of any withholding taxes which may be required thereon.

        (d)   At or after the Effective Time, there shall be no transfers on the stock transfer books of the Company of the shares of Company Common Stock or Company Preferred Stock which were outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Time. If, after the Effective Time, Certificates are presented to the Surviving Corporation, they shall be canceled and exchanged for certificates evidencing shares of Acquiror Common Stock and cash payable in accordance with Section 3.2(b), if any, and cash in lieu of fractional shares, if any, deliverable in respect thereof pursuant to this Agreement in accordance with the procedures set forth in this Article III. Certificates surrendered for exchange by any person constituting an "affiliate" of the Company for purposes of Rule 145(c) under the Securities Act shall not be exchanged until Acquiror has received an Affiliate Letter from such person as provided in Section 7.2 hereof.

        (e)   Any portion of the Exchange Fund (including the proceeds of any investments thereof and any shares of Acquiror Common Stock) that remains unclaimed by the former stockholders of the Company one year after the Effective Time shall be returned to Acquiror.

        (f)    None of Acquiror, the Company, the Surviving Corporation, the Exchange Agent or any other Person shall be liable to any former holder of shares of Company Common Stock or Company Preferred Stock for any amount properly delivered to a public official pursuant to applicable abandoned property, escheat or similar laws.

        (g)   In the event any Certificate shall have been lost, stolen or destroyed, upon the making of an affidavit with respect thereto by the Person claiming such Certificate to be lost, stolen or destroyed, the Exchange Agent will deliver in exchange for such lost, stolen or destroyed Certificate the shares of Acquiror Common Stock and cash in lieu of fractional shares, and unpaid dividends and distributions on shares of Acquiror Common Stock as provided in Section 3.3(c) hereof, deliverable in respect thereof pursuant to this Agreement.

        (h)   Each of the Exchange Agent, Acquiror and the Surviving Corporation shall be entitled to deduct and withhold from the consideration otherwise deliverable pursuant to this Agreement to any holder or former holder of shares of Company Common Stock such amounts as it reasonably determines that it is required to deduct and withhold with respect to the making of such payment under the Code, or any other applicable provision of state, local or foreign tax law or any other applicable legal requirement. To the extent that amounts are so deducted or withheld, such amounts shall be treated for all purposes of this Agreement as having been paid to the person to whom such amounts would have otherwise have been delivered.

        3.4    Dissenter's Rights.    Notwithstanding anything in this Agreement to the contrary, shares of Company Common Stock and Company Preferred Stock, if any, issued and outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Time and held by a holder who has not voted in favor of the Merger and who has delivered a written demand for appraisal of such shares in accordance with Section 262 of the DGCL (a "Dissenting Stockholder") shall not be converted into the right to receive the Merger consideration, as applicable, provided in Section 3.2 hereof, unless and until such holder fails to perfect or effectively withdraws or otherwise loses such holder's right to appraisal under the DGCL. A Dissenting Stockholder may receive payment of the fair value of the shares of Company Common Stock or Preferred Stock, as applicable, issued and outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Time and held by such Dissenting Stockholder ("Dissenting Shares") in accordance with the provisions of the DGCL, provided that such Dissenting Stockholder complies with Section 262 of the DGCL. At the

A-6



Effective Time, all Dissenting Shares shall be cancelled and cease to exist and shall represent only the right to receive the fair value thereof in accordance with the DGCL. If, after the Effective Time, any Dissenting Stockholder fails to perfect or effectively withdraws or otherwise loses such Dissenting Stockholder's right to appraisal, such Dissenting Stockholder's Dissenting Shares shall thereupon be treated as if they had been converted, as of the Effective Time, into the right to receive the Merger consideration set forth in Section 3.2 hereof. The Company shall give Acquiror (a) prompt notice of any written demands for appraisal, withdrawals of demands for appraisal and any other instruments served under the DGCL and (b) the opportunity to participate in and direct all negotiations, proceedings or settlements with respect to demands for appraisal under the DGCL. The Company shall not voluntarily make any payment with respect to any demands for appraisal and shall not, except with Acquiror's prior written consent, settle or offer to settle any such demands.

        3.5    Adjustment of Exchange Ratio.    In the event that, subsequent to the date of this Agreement but prior to the Effective Time, the outstanding shares of any of Acquiror Common Stock or Company Common Stock shall have been changed into a different number of shares or a different class as a result of a stock split, reverse stock split, stock dividend, subdivision, reclassification, split, combination, exchange, recapitalization or other similar transaction, the Exchange Ratio shall be proportionately adjusted.

        3.6    Indemnification Escrow Agreement.    Pursuant to Article XII hereof, the stockholders of the Company shall indemnify and hold the Acquiror and the Surviving Corporation harmless from and against certain Indemnified Losses (as hereinafter defined). On or prior to Closing, Acquiror, an escrow agent (the "Escrow Agent") mutually agreed upon by Acquiror and the Company, and the Company, on behalf of its stockholders, shall enter into an Indemnification Escrow Agreement in substantially the form of Exhibit 3.5 attached hereto (the "Indemnification Escrow Agreement"). Notwithstanding any other provision in this Agreement to the contrary, in order to secure the indemnification obligations to the Acquiror Indemnified Parties under this Agreement, a certificate evidencing ten percent (10%) of the shares of Acquiror Common Stock which would otherwise be delivered to the stockholders of the Company at Closing pursuant to Section 3.3 hereof (collectively, the "Escrowed Shares") shall be registered in the name of the Escrow Agent, as nominee for the stockholders of the Company, and ten percent (10%) of the aggregate amount of cash which would otherwise be delivered to the stockholders of the Company pursuant to Section 3.3 hereof (the "Escrowed Cash"), shall instead be deposited into and held in escrow pursuant to the terms of the Indemnification Escrow Agreement. Acquiror is hereby directed by the Company, on behalf of each of the Company's stockholders, to deposit the number of Escrowed Shares and amount of Escrowed Cash set forth opposite such stockholder's name in Annex A to the Indemnification Escrow Agreement with the Escrow Agent at the Closing, and Acquiror shall make such deposit as so directed and as contemplated in the preceding sentence.

        3.7    Appointment of Stockholder Representative.    By virtue of the approval of this Agreement by the holders of Company Common Stock and Company Preferred Stock, John A. Friede shall be approved and appointed by the Company the "Stockholder Representative" under the Indemnification Escrow Agreement (the "Stockholder Representative") and shall be constituted and appointed as agent and attorney-in-fact for and on behalf of each such holder. The Stockholder Representative shall have full power and authority to represent such holders and their successors with respect to all matters arising under the Indemnification Escrow Agreement and all actions taken by the Stockholder Representative thereunder shall be binding upon all stockholders and their successors as if expressly confirmed and ratified in writing by each of them, including, without limitation, resolving all claims relating to the Escrow Fund (as defined in the Indemnification Escrow Agreement) and any indemnification claims and obligations.

A-7



ARTICLE IV

REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES OF ACQUIROR

        Except as set forth in the schedules delivered to the Company prior to or simultaneously with the execution hereof (collectively, the "Acquiror Disclosure Schedule"), Acquiror represents and warrants to the Company that the statements contained in this Article IV are true and correct as of the date hereof. The Sections of the Acquiror Disclosure Schedule setting forth exceptions to the representations and warranties contained in this Article IV are numbered to correspond to the applicable sections of this Article IV. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement to the contrary, each exception set forth in the Acquiror Disclosure Schedule will be deemed to qualify each representation and warranty set forth in this Article IV (i) that is specifically identified (by cross-reference or otherwise) in the Acquiror Disclosure Schedule as being qualified by such exception or (ii) with respect to which the relevance of such exception to such representation and warranty is reasonably apparent on the face of the disclosure of such exception.

        4.1    Organization and Qualification.    Each of Acquiror and Merger Sub is a corporation duly organized, validly existing and in good standing under the laws of the State of Delaware and has the requisite power and authority to carry on its business as it is now being conducted. Acquiror is duly qualified to do business and is in good standing in each jurisdiction in which the properties owned, leased or operated by it or the nature of the business conducted by it makes such qualification necessary, except where the failure to be so qualified and in good standing would not, when taken together with all other such failures, have a material adverse effect on the business, operations, assets, condition (financial or other) or prospects of Acquiror and its subsidiaries, taken as a whole (any such material adverse effect with respect to Acquiror and its subsidiaries being referred to herein as an "Acquiror Material Adverse Effect"); provided, however, that an Acquiror Material Adverse Effect shall not include (a) any changes, events, circumstances, developments or effects that are (x) caused by global or national economic or business conditions generally or (y) attributable to the public announcement or pendency of this Agreement or the performance of this Agreement or (b) a decrease in the market price of Acquiror Common Stock in and of itself.

        4.2    Capitalization.    

A-8


        4.3    Subsidiaries.    Each direct and indirect subsidiary of Acquiror (including Merger Sub) is duly organized, validly existing and in good standing under the laws of its jurisdiction of incorporation and has the requisite power and authority to carry on its business as it is now being conducted and each such subsidiary is qualified to do business, and is in good standing, in each jurisdiction in which the properties owned, leased or operated by it or the nature of the business conducted by it makes such qualification necessary, except where the failure to be so qualified and in such good standing will not have an Acquiror Material Adverse Effect. Merger Sub was formed solely for the purpose of engaging in the transactions contemplated by this Agreement, has engaged in no other business activities and has conducted its operations only as contemplated by this Agreement.

        4.4    Power and Authority; Non-contravention; Government Approvals.    

A-9


        4.5    Reports and Financial Statements; Information Provided.    

A-10


        4.6    Absence of Undisclosed Liabilities.    Neither Acquiror nor any of its subsidiaries (including Merger Sub) had at July 31, 2003, or has incurred since such date, any liabilities or obligations (whether absolute, accrued, contingent or otherwise) of any nature, except liabilities, obligations or contingencies which (a) are accrued or reserved against in the Acquiror Financial Statements or reflected in the notes thereto, (b) were incurred after July 31, 2003 and were incurred in the ordinary course of business, consistent with past practices, (c) would not have an Acquiror Material Adverse Effect, (d) are disclosed in the Acquiror SEC Reports filed prior to the date hereof, (e) are

A-11


contemplated by this Agreement or the transactions contemplated hereby or (f) have been discharged or paid in full prior to the date hereof.

        4.7    Absence of Certain Changes or Events.    Except as set forth in Section 4.7 of the Acquiror Disclosure Schedule and as set forth in the Acquiror SEC Reports filed prior to the date hereof, since July 31, 2003 (a) there have been no events, changes or occurrences which have had, or would reasonably be expected to have, an Acquiror Material Adverse Effect and (b) Acquiror and its subsidiaries (including Merger Sub) have not changed, in any material respect, the accounting methods or practices followed by Acquiror, including any material change in any assumption underlying, or method of calculating, any bad debt, contingency or other reserve.

        4.8    Litigation.    Except as set forth in Section 4.8 of the Acquiror Disclosure Schedule and as set forth in the Acquiror SEC Reports filed prior to the date hereof, there are no claims, suits, actions or proceedings pending or, to the knowledge of Acquiror, threatened against, relating to or affecting Acquiror or any of its subsidiaries (including Merger Sub), before any Governmental Authority or arbitrator that seek to restrain the consummation of the Merger or which would reasonably be expected, either alone or in the aggregate with all such claims, suits, actions or proceedings, to have an Acquiror Material Adverse Effect. None of Acquiror or any of its subsidiaries (including Merger Sub) or any of their respective properties or assets is subject to any judgment, decree, injunction, rule or order of any Governmental Authority or arbitrator which prohibits or restricts the consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby or would have an Acquiror Material Adverse Effect.

        4.9    No Violation of Law; Licenses, Permits and Registrations.    Neither Acquiror nor any of its subsidiaries (including Merger Sub) is in violation of, or has been given notice or been charged with any violation of, any law, statute, order, rule, regulation, ordinance or judgment (including, without limitation, any applicable environmental law, ordinance or regulation) of any Governmental Authority, except for violations which would not reasonably be expected to have an Acquiror Material Adverse Effect. As of the date of this Agreement, no investigation or review by any Governmental Authority is pending or, to the knowledge of Acquiror, threatened involving Acquiror or its subsidiaries (including Merger Sub). Each of Acquiror and each of its subsidiaries (including Merger Sub) has all permits, licenses, approvals and authorizations of, and registrations with and under, all federal, state, local and foreign laws, and from all applicable Governmental Authorities, required thereby to carry on its businesses as currently conducted, except where the failure to have any such permits, licenses, approvals, authorizations or registrations would not reasonably be expected to have an Acquiror Material Adverse Effect.

        4.10    Taxes.    All Tax Returns required to be filed prior to the date hereof with respect to Acquiror and its subsidiaries or their respective income, properties, franchises or operations have been timely filed, except for such Tax Returns which are not material to Acquiror. Each such Tax Return has been prepared in compliance with all applicable laws and regulations, and all such Tax Returns are true and correct in all material respects. All Taxes due and payable by or with respect to Acquiror and its subsidiaries have been paid or are accrued on the balance sheet included in the Acquiror Financial Statements. Each of Acquiror and its subsidiaries has withheld and paid all Taxes to the appropriate Governmental Authorities required to have been withheld and paid in connection with amounts paid or owing to any employee, independent contractor, creditor, stockholder or other third party. Except as set forth in Section 4.10 of the Acquiror Disclosure Schedule, with respect to each taxable period of Acquiror and its subsidiaries (a) no deficiency or proposed adjustment which has not been settled or otherwise resolved for any amount of Taxes has been asserted or assessed by any taxing authority against Acquiror or its subsidiaries, other than a deficiency or an adjustment which would not reasonably be expected to have an Acquiror Material Adverse Effect and (b) there are no Liens for Taxes (other than for current Taxes not yet due and payable) upon the assets of Acquiror or any of its subsidiaries.

A-12



        4.11    Labor and Employment Matters.    Neither Acquiror nor any of its subsidiaries is a party to or bound by any collective bargaining agreement or any other agreement with a labor union; and, to the knowledge of Acquiror, there has been no effort by any labor union during the 24 months prior to the date hereof to organize any employees of Acquiror or any of its subsidiaries into one or more collective bargaining units. There is no pending or, to the knowledge of Acquiror, threatened labor dispute, strike or work stoppage which materially affects or which may materially affect the business of Acquiror or any of its subsidiaries or which may materially interfere with its continued operations. None of Acquiror, its subsidiaries or any agent, representative or employee thereof has, within the last 24 months, committed any unfair labor practice as defined in the National Labor Relations Act, as amended, and there is no pending or, to the knowledge of Acquiror, threatened charge or complaint against Acquiror or any of its subsidiaries by or with the National Labor Relations Board or any representative thereof. There has been no strike, walkout or work stoppage involving any of the employees of Acquiror or any of its subsidiaries during the 24 months prior to the date hereof. Each of Acquiror and its subsidiaries has complied in all material respects with applicable laws, rules and regulations relating to employment, civil rights and equal employment opportunities, including but not limited to, the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Fair Labor Standards Act, and the Americans with Disabilities Act, as amended.

        4.12    Compliance With Environmental Laws.    

A-13


A-14


        4.13    Good Title to and Condition of Assets.    

        4.14    Insurance.    Each of Acquiror and its subsidiaries is covered by valid and enforceable policies of insurance covering its properties, assets and businesses against risks of the nature normally insured against by corporations in the same or similar lines of business and in coverage amounts determined to be appropriate by the Acquiror Board. Insurance policies meeting the criteria in the preceding sentence are in full force and effect, and all premiums due thereon have been paid (collectively, the "Acquiror Insurance Policies"). As of the Closing, each of the Acquiror Insurance Policies will be in full force and effect. None of the Acquiror Insurance Policies will lapse or terminate as a result of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement.

        4.15    Affiliated Transactions.    Except as disclosed in Acquiror SEC Reports filed prior to the date hereof or as otherwise set forth in Section 4.15 of the Acquiror Disclosure Schedule, neither Acquiror nor any of its subsidiaries has entered into any transaction with any Affiliate of Acquiror or any of its subsidiaries or any transaction that would be subject to proxy statement disclosure pursuant to Item 404 of Regulation S-K.

        4.16    Material Contracts.    There are no agreements, contracts and commitments to which Acquiror or any of its subsidiaries is a party or is bound that are material contracts (as defined in Item 601(b)(10) of Regulation S-K) with respect to Acquiror or any of its subsidiaries ("Acquiror Material Contracts"), other than those Acquiror Material Contracts identified on the exhibit indices of the Acquiror SEC Reports filed prior to the date hereof. Except as set forth in Section 4.16 of the Acquiror Disclosure Schedule, (a) each of Acquiror and its subsidiaries has performed, in all material respects, its obligations under the Acquiror Material Contracts to which it is a party to the extent such obligations to perform have accrued and (b) to the knowledge of Acquiror, the other parties to the Acquiror Material Contracts have performed, in all material respects, their respective obligations thereunder. There is no non-competition or other similar agreement, contract, arrangement, understanding, commitment, judgement, injunction or order to which Acquiror or any of its subsidiaries is a party or to which Acquiror or any of its subsidiaries is subject that has or could reasonably be expected to have the effect of prohibiting or impairing the conduct of the business of Acquiror or any of its subsidiaries as currently conducted in any material respect.

        4.17    Intellectual Property.    

A-15


A-16


        4.18    Brokers and Finders.    Except with respect to Bear, Stearns & Co. Inc. (a) Acquiror has not entered into any contract, arrangement or understanding with any person or firm which may result in the obligation of Acquiror to pay any finder's fees, brokerage or agent commissions or other similar payments in connection with the transactions contemplated hereby and (b) there is no claim for payment by Acquiror of any investment banking fees, finder's fees, brokerage or agent commissions or other similar payments in connection with the negotiations leading to this Agreement or the consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby.

        4.19    Opinion of Financial Advisor.    The financial advisor of Acquiror, Bear, Stearns & Co. Inc., has delivered to Acquiror an opinion, dated the date of this Agreement, to the effect that the Exchange Ratio is fair to Acquiror from a financial point of view.


ARTICLE V

REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES OF THE COMPANY

        Except as set forth in the schedules delivered to Acquiror and Merger Sub prior to or simultaneously with the execution hereof (collectively, the "Company Disclosure Schedule"), the Company represents and warrants to Acquiror and Merger Sub that the statements contained in this Article V are true and correct as of the date hereof. The Sections of the Company Disclosure Schedule setting forth exceptions to the representations and warranties in this Article V are numbered to correspond to the applicable sections of this Article V. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement to the contrary, each exception set forth in the Company Disclosure Schedule will be deemed to qualify each representation and warranty set forth in this Article V (i) that is specifically identified (by cross-reference or otherwise) in the Company Disclosure Schedule as being qualified by

A-17



such exception or (ii) with respect to which the relevance of such exception to such representation and warranty is reasonably apparent on the face of the disclosure of such exception.

        5.1    Organization and Qualification.    The Company is a corporation duly organized, validly existing and in good standing under the laws of the State of Delaware and has the requisite corporate power and authority to carry on its business as it is now being conducted. The Company is duly qualified to do business and is in good standing in each jurisdiction in which the properties owned, leased or operated by it or the nature of the business conducted by it makes such qualification necessary, except where the failure to be so qualified and in good standing would not, when taken together with all other such failures, have a material adverse effect on the business, operations, assets, condition (financial or other) or prospects of the Company and its subsidiaries, taken as a whole (any such material adverse effect with respect to the Company and its subsidiaries being referred to herein as a "Company Material Adverse Effect"); provided, however, that a Company Material Adverse Effect shall not include any changes, events, circumstances, developments or effects that are (a) caused by global or national economic or business conditions generally or (b) attributable to the public announcement or pendency of this Agreement or the performance of this Agreement.

        5.2    Capitalization.    

A-18


        5.3    Subsidiaries.    The name and jurisdiction of incorporation or organization of each direct and indirect subsidiary of the Company (including, without limitation, any corporation, partnership, limited liability company, joint venture or other business entity in which the Company owns, directly or indirectly, any outstanding voting securities of, or other interests in, or has control of such entity) is set forth in Section 5.3 of the Company Disclosure Schedule. Each such subsidiary is duly organized, validly existing and in good standing under the laws of its jurisdiction of organization or incorporation and has the requisite power and authority to carry on its business as it is now being conducted and each such subsidiary is qualified to do business, and is in good standing, in each jurisdiction in which the properties owned, leased or operated thereby or the nature of the business conducted thereby makes such qualification necessary, except where the failure to be so qualified and in such good standing will not have a Company Material Adverse Effect. There are no subscriptions or rights relating to the issuance of any shares of capital stock of any such subsidiary of the Company, including any right of conversion or exchange under any outstanding security, instrument or agreement.

        5.4    Power and Authority; Non-contravention; Government Approvals.    

A-19


        5.5    Financial Statements; Information Provided.    

A-20


        5.6    Absence of Undisclosed Liabilities.    Except as set forth in Section 5.6 of the Company Disclosure Schedule, neither the Company nor any of its subsidiaries had at the date of the Current Balance Sheet, or since the date of the Current Balance Sheet, has incurred, any liabilities or obligations (whether absolute, accrued, contingent or otherwise) of any nature, except liabilities, obligations or contingencies which (a) are accrued or reserved against in the Company Financial Statements or reflected in the notes thereto, (b) were incurred after the date of the Current Balance Sheet and were incurred in the ordinary course of business, consistent with past practices, (c) are

A-21


contemplated by this Agreement or the transactions contemplated hereby, (d) would not have a Company Material Adverse Effect or (e) have been discharged or paid in full prior to the date hereof.

        5.7    Absence of Certain Changes or Events.    Since the date of the Current Balance Sheet, and except as set forth in Section 5.7 of the Company Disclosure Schedule, neither the Company nor any of its subsidiaries has (a) made any distribution of or with respect to its capital stock or other securities or purchased or redeemed any of its securities; (b) paid any bonus to or increased the rate of compensation of any of its executive officers or amended any other terms of employment of such persons other than in the ordinary course of business; (c) sold, leased or transferred any of its material properties or assets other than in the ordinary course of business consistent with past practice; (d) made or obligated itself to make capital expenditures other than in the ordinary course of business consistent with past practice; (e) made any payment in respect of its liabilities other than in the ordinary course of business consistent with past practice; (f) incurred any obligations or liabilities or entered into any transaction or series of transactions involving in excess of $100,000 in the aggregate, other than in the ordinary course of business consistent with past practice, except for this Agreement and the transactions contemplated hereby; (g) suffered any theft, damage, destruction, casualty or extraordinary loss, not covered by insurance and for which a timely claim was filed, in excess of $100,000 in the aggregate; (h) suffered any extraordinary losses (whether or not covered by insurance); (i) waived, canceled, compromised or released any material rights having a value in excess of $100,000 in the aggregate; (j) made or adopted any material change in its accounting methods, practices or policies (including any material change in any assumption underlying, or method of calculating, any bad debt, contingency or other reserve); (k) terminated, amended or modifying any agreement involving an amount in excess of $100,000; (l) delayed paying any accounts payable which are due and payable except to the extent being contested in good faith; (m) made or pledged any charitable contribution in excess of $100,000; (n) entered into any other transaction or been subject to any event, change or occurrence which has or may have a Company Material Adverse Effect; or (o) agreed to do or authorized any of the foregoing.

        5.8    Litigation.    Except as set forth in Section 5.8 of the Company Disclosure Schedule, neither the Company nor any of its subsidiaries (a) is subject to any outstanding injunction, judgment, order, decree, ruling or charge or (b) is a party or, to the Company's knowledge, threatened to be made a party to any action, suit, proceeding, hearing or investigation of, in, or before any court or quasi-judicial or administrative agency of any federal, state, local or foreign jurisdiction or before any arbitrator. Section 5.8 of the Company Disclosure Schedule sets forth, with respect to each matter listed thereon, the name, address, telephone number and facsimile number of the legal counsel handing such matter on behalf of the Company. None of the actions, suits, proceedings, hearings, and investigations set forth in the Company Disclosure Schedule would reasonably be expected to result in any Material Adverse Effect on the Company. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, no action, suit, or proceeding is pending or, to the Company's knowledge, threatened before any court or quasi-judicial or administrative agency of any federal, state, local, or foreign jurisdiction or before any arbitrator, wherein an unfavorable injunction, judgment, order, decree, ruling, or charge would (i) prevent consummation of any of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement, (ii) cause any of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement to be rescinded following consummation or (iii) affect adversely the right of the Company to own any material portion of its assets or affect adversely, in any material respect, the right of the Company to operate its business, and no such injunction, judgment, order, decree, ruling, or charge is in effect. There are no outstanding orders, decrees or stipulations issued by any Governmental Authority in any proceeding to which the Company was a party which have not been complied with in full and in any event does not prohibit or restrict the consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby or would have a Company Material Adverse Effect.

        5.9    No Violation of Law; Licenses, Permits and Registrations.    Neither the Company nor any of its subsidiaries is in violation of, or has been given notice or been charged with any violation of, any law,

A-22



statute, order, rule, regulation, ordinance or judgment (including, without limitation, any applicable environmental law, ordinance or regulation) of any Governmental Authority, except for violations which would not reasonably be expected to have a Company Material Adverse Effect. As of the date of this Agreement, no investigation or review by any Governmental Authority is pending or, to the knowledge of the Company, threatened involving the Company or its subsidiaries. Each of the Company and each of its subsidiaries has all permits, licenses, approvals and authorizations of, and registrations with and under, all federal, state, local and foreign laws, and from all applicable Governmental Authorities, required thereby to carry on its businesses as currently conducted, except where the failure to have any such permits, licenses, approvals, authorizations or registrations would not reasonably be expected to have a Company Material Adverse Effect.

        5.10    Taxes.    Except as set forth in Section 5.10 of the Company Disclosure Schedule, all Tax Returns required to be filed prior to the date hereof with respect to the Company and its subsidiaries or their respective income, properties, franchises or operations have been timely filed. Each such Tax Return has been prepared in compliance with all applicable laws and regulations, and all such Tax Returns are true and correct in all material respects. All Taxes due and payable by or with respect to the Company and its subsidiaries have been paid or are accrued on the balance sheet included in the Company Financial Statements. Each of the Company and its subsidiaries has withheld and paid all Taxes to the appropriate Governmental Authorities required to have been withheld and paid in connection with amounts paid or owing to any employee, independent contractor, creditor, stockholder or other third party. With respect to each taxable period of the Company and its subsidiaries: (a) no deficiency or proposed adjustment which has not been settled or otherwise resolved for any amount of Taxes has been asserted or assessed by any taxing authority against the Company or its subsidiaries, other than a deficiency or an adjustment which would not reasonably be expected to have a Company Material Adverse Effect, (b) neither the Company nor any of its subsidiaries has consented to extend the time in which any Taxes may be assessed or collected by any taxing authority, (c) neither the Company nor any of its subsidiaries has requested or been granted an extension of the time for filing any Tax Return, (d) there is no action, suit, taxing authority proceeding, or audit or claim for refund now in progress, or pending or, to the knowledge of the Company, threatened against or with respect to the Company or any of its subsidiaries regarding Taxes and (e) there are no Liens for Taxes (other than for current Taxes not yet due and payable) upon the assets of the Company or any of its subsidiaries.

        5.11    Labor and Employment Matters.    Section 5.11 of the Company Disclosure Schedule sets forth the name and current rate of compensation of each employee of the Company and its subsidiaries. Neither the Company nor any of its subsidiaries is a party to or bound by any collective bargaining agreement or any other agreement with a labor union; and, to the knowledge of the Company, there has been no effort by any labor union during the 24 months prior to the date hereof to organize any employees of the Company or any of its subsidiaries into one or more collective bargaining units. There is no pending or, to the knowledge of the Company, threatened labor dispute, strike or work stoppage which materially affects or which may materially affect the business of the Company or any of its subsidiaries or which may materially interfere with its continued operations. None of the Company, its subsidiaries or any agent, representative or employee thereof has, within the last 24 months, committed any unfair labor practice as defined in the National Labor Relations Act, as amended, and there is no pending or, to the knowledge of the Company, threatened charge or complaint against the Company or any of its subsidiaries by or with the National Labor Relations Board or any representative thereof. There has been no strike, walkout or work stoppage involving any of the employees of the Company or any of its subsidiaries during the 24 months prior to the date hereof. Each of the Company and its subsidiaries has complied in all material respects with applicable laws, rules and regulations relating to employment, civil rights and equal employment opportunities, including but not limited to, the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Fair Labor Standards Act, and the Americans with Disabilities Act, as amended. Except as set forth in Section 5.11 of the Company Disclosure Schedule, the Company has no

A-23



knowledge that any executive or key employee or group of employees of the Company or any of its subsidiaries has any plans to terminate employment with the Company or such subsidiaries as a result of the transactions contemplated hereby or otherwise.

        5.12    Employee Benefit Plans.    

A-24


        5.13    Compliance With Environmental Laws.    

A-25


        5.14    Real Estate.    Neither the Company nor any of its subsidiaries owns any parcels of real property. Section 5.14 of the Company Disclosure Schedule sets forth (a) a list of all real property leases or similar agreements to which the Company or any of its subsidiaries is a party (each, a "Real Property Lease"), true and complete copies of which have previously been furnished to Acquiror, (b) the lessor and lessee of each Real Property Lease and the date and term of each Real Property Lease and (c) the street address of each property covered by each Real Property Lease (the "Leased Premises"). The Real Property Leases are in full force and effect and have not been amended, and neither the Company nor, to the knowledge of the Company, any other party thereto is in default or breach thereunder. No event has occurred which, with the passage of time or the giving of notice or both, would cause a material breach of or material default by the Company under any of such Real Property Leases and, to Company's knowledge, there is no breach or anticipated breach by any other party thereto. With respect to each of the Leased Premises: (i) the Company has valid leasehold interests or other rights of use and occupancy in such Leased Premises, free and clear of any Liens; (ii) such Leased Premises are properly zoned for the uses to which the Company puts such Leased Premises, are in good repair and condition, reasonable wear and tear excepted, and are sufficient to satisfy the Company's normal business activities as conducted thereat; (iii) each of the Leased Premises (w) has direct access to public roads or access to public roads by means of a perpetual access easement, such access being sufficient to satisfy the current and reasonably anticipated normal transportation requirements of the Company's business as presently conducted at such parcel; and (x) is served by all utilities in such quantity and quality as are reasonably sufficient to satisfy the current normal business activities as conducted at such Leased Premises; and (iv) the Company has not received notice of any condemnation proceeding with respect to any portion of such Leased Premises or any access thereto and, to the knowledge of the Company, no such proceeding is contemplated by any Governmental Authority.

        5.15    Good Title to and Condition of Assets.    

        5.16    Insurance.    Each of the Company and its subsidiaries is covered by valid and enforceable policies of insurance covering its properties, assets and businesses against risks of the nature normally insured against by corporations in the same or similar lines of business and in coverage amounts typically and reasonably carried by such corporations. Insurance policies meeting the criteria in the preceding sentence are in full force and effect, and all premiums due thereon have been paid (collectively, the "Company Insurance Policies"). As of the Closing, each of the Company Insurance Policies will be in full force and effect. None of the Company Insurance Policies will lapse or terminate as a result of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement. Each of the Company and its

A-26


subsidiaries has complied with the provisions of such Company Insurance Policies. Section 5.16 of the Company Disclosure Schedule contains (a) a complete and correct list of all Company Insurance Policies and all amendments and riders thereto (copies of which have been provided or made available to Acquiror) and (b) a description of each pending claim under any of the Company Insurance Policies, or any insurance policy previously in effect, for an amount in excess of $100,000 that relates to loss or damage to the properties, assets or businesses of the Company.

        5.17    Relationships with Customers and Suppliers; Affiliated Transactions.    No current customer of the Company or any of its subsidiaries that was responsible for five percent or more of the Company's revenue during the Company's last full fiscal year has, to the knowledge of the Company, threatened in writing to terminate its business relationship with the Company or any such subsidiary for any reason. Neither the Company nor any of its subsidiaries has any direct or indirect interest in any customer, supplier or competitor of the Company or such subsidiary, or in any Person from whom or to whom the Company or such subsidiary leases real or personal property. Except as set forth in Section 5.17 of the Company Disclosure Schedule, no officer, director or stockholder of the Company or any of its subsidiaries, nor any person related by blood or marriage to any such officer, director or stockholder, nor any entity in which any such officer, director or stockholder owns any beneficial interest, is a party to any agreement or transaction with the Company or any such subsidiary or has any interest in any property used by the Company or any such subsidiary.

        5.18    Bank Accounts; Business Locations.    Section 5.18 of the Company Disclosure Schedule sets forth all accounts of the Company and each of its subsidiaries with any bank, broker or other depository institution and the names of all persons authorized to withdraw funds from each such account. As of the date hereof, neither the Company nor any of its subsidiaries has any office or place of business other than as identified in such Section 5.18 of the Company Disclosure Schedule and the respective principal places of business and chief executive offices of the Company and each of its subsidiaries are indicated in such Section 5.18 and all locations where the equipment, inventory, chattel paper and books and records of the Company and its subsidiaries are located, as of the date hereof, are fully identified in Section 5.18 of the Company Disclosure Schedule.

        5.19    Names; Prior Acquisitions.    All names under which the Company and each of its subsidiaries does business, as of the date hereof, are specified in Section 5.19 of the Company Disclosure Schedule. Except as set forth in Section 5.19 of the Company Disclosure Schedule, neither the Company nor any of its subsidiaries has changed its name or used any assumed or fictitious name, or been the surviving entity in a merger, acquired any business or changed its principal place of business or chief executive office, within the past three years.

        5.20    Material Contracts.    

A-27


A-28


        5.21    Brokers and Finders.    Except with respect to CIBC World Markets Corp., (a) the Company has not entered into any contract, arrangement or understanding with any person or firm which may result in the obligation of the Company to pay any finder's fees, brokerage or agent commissions or other similar payments in connection with the transactions contemplated hereby and (b) there is no claim for payment by the Company of any investment banking fees, finder's fees, brokerage or agent commissions or other similar payments in connection with the negotiations leading to this Agreement or the consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby.

        5.22    Opinion of Financial Advisor.    The Company Board has received the opinion of CIBC World Markets Corp. to the effect that, as of the date of this Agreement, the Exchange Ratio is fair, from a financial point of view, to the holders of Company Common Stock.

        5.23    Intellectual Property.    

A-29


A-30


        5.24    Records of the Company.    The minute books for the Company made available to Acquiror for review were correct and complete in all material respects as of the date of such review, no further entries have been made through the date of this Agreement, such minute books contain the true signatures of the persons purporting to have signed them, and such minute books contain an accurate record of all material corporate actions of the stockholders and directors, and any committees thereof, of the Company taken by written consent or at a meeting since incorporation of the Company. All material corporate actions taken by the Company have been duly authorized or ratified. All accounts, books, ledgers and official and other records of the Company have been fully, properly and accurately kept and completed in all material respects, and there are no material inaccuracies or discrepancies of any kind contained therein. The stock ledgers of the Company, as previously made available to Acquiror, contain accurate and complete records of all issuances, transfers and cancellations of shares of the capital stock of the Company.

        5.25    Accuracy of Information Furnished by Company.    No statement made or information provided by the Company in this Agreement, any other Transaction Document or the Company Disclosure Schedule, contains or shall contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omits or shall omit any material fact necessary to make the information contained therein, in light of the circumstances in which such statements were made, not misleading. The Company has made available to or provided Acquiror with true, accurate and complete copies of all documents listed or described in the Company Disclosure Schedule.


ARTICLE VI

CONDUCT OF BUSINESS PENDING THE MERGER

        6.1    Conduct of Business Pending the Merger.    After the date hereof and prior to the Closing Date or earlier termination of this Agreement, except (i) as set forth in Section 6.1 of the Company Disclosure Schedule or the Acquiror Disclosure Schedule, as applicable, (ii) in connection with specific actions that a party is explicitly required or permitted to take pursuant to this Agreement or (iii) to the extent that the other party hereto shall otherwise consent in writing (which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed), each of the Company and Acquiror shall, and shall cause each of its subsidiaries to:

A-31


        6.2    Control of Acquiror's Operations.    Nothing contained in this Agreement shall give to the Company, directly or indirectly, rights to control or direct Acquiror's operations prior to the Effective Time.

        6.3    Control of Company's Operations.    Nothing contained in this Agreement shall give to Acquiror, directly or indirectly, rights to control or direct the Company's operations prior to the Effective Time.


ARTICLE VII

ADDITIONAL AGREEMENTS

        7.1    Access to Information.    

A-32


        7.2    Affiliate Letter.    The Company shall use its commercially reasonable efforts to cause each officer, each director and each other person who is an "affiliate" (as that term is used in Rule 145 promulgated under the Securities Act) thereof to deliver to Acquiror, on or prior to the Effective Time, a written agreement (an "Affiliate Letter") in substantially the form of Exhibit 7.2 attached hereto. At least 30 days prior to the Closing Date, the Company shall deliver to Acquiror a list of names and addresses of those persons who were, in the reasonable judgment of the Company, at the record date for such party's stockholders' meeting to approve the Merger, "affiliates" (as so defined).

        7.3    No Solicitation.    

A-33


A-34


A-35


        7.4    Joint Proxy Statement/Prospectus; Registration Statement.    

        7.5    All Reasonable Efforts; Agreement to Cooperate.    

A-36


        7.6    Public Statements.    Except as may be required by applicable law or any listing agreement with a national securities exchange, the parties shall consult with each other prior to issuing any press release or any written public statement with respect to this Agreement or the transactions contemplated hereby and shall not issue any such press release or written public statement prior to such consultation.

        7.7    Notification of Certain Matters.    Each of the Company and Acquiror agrees to give prompt notice to the other such party of, and to use commercially reasonable efforts to remedy (a) the occurrence or failure to occur of any event which occurrence or failure to occur would reasonably be expected to cause any of the representations or warranties of the Company or Acquiror, as the case may be, in this Agreement to be untrue or inaccurate in any material respect at the Effective Time and (b) any material failure on the part of the Company or Acquiror, as the case may be, to comply with or satisfy any covenant, agreement or condition to be complied with or satisfied thereby hereunder; provided, however, that the delivery of any notice pursuant to this Section 7.7 shall not limit or otherwise affect the remedies available hereunder to the party receiving such notice.

        7.8    Approval of Stockholders.    

A-37


        7.9    Section 16 Matters.    Acquiror and Company shall take all steps reasonably necessary to cause the acquisitions of shares of Acquiror Common Stock or other equity securities (including stock options and other derivative securities) of Acquiror in connection with the Merger, and subsequent dispositions of such equity securities of Acquiror (including stock options and other derivative securities), by each individual who is a director or officer of the Company to be exempt pursuant to Rule 16b-3 under the Exchange Act. Without limiting the foregoing, the Acquiror Board, or a committee thereof consisting of two or more non-employee directors (as such term is defined for purposes of Rule 16b-3(d) under the Exchange Act), shall adopt a resolution in advance of the Effective Time providing that the acquisition of Acquiror Common Stock and Replacement Options by those officers and directors of the Company who will become subject to the reporting requirements of Section 16 of the Exchange Act pursuant to the transactions contemplated hereby and as required by applicable law, is intended to be exempt pursuant to Rule 16b-3 under the Exchange Act.

        7.10    368(a) Reorganization.    The Company and Acquiror shall each use commercially reasonable efforts to cause the Merger to be treated as a reorganization within the meaning of Section 368 of the Code. The parties hereto hereby adopt this Agreement as a plan of reorganization.

A-38



        7.11    Nasdaq National Market Listing.    Acquiror shall, if required by the rules of The Nasdaq Stock Market, Inc., file with The Nasdaq Stock Market, Inc. a Notification Form: Listing of Additional Shares with respect to the Acquiror Common Stock issuable pursuant to the transactions contemplated by this Agreement.

        7.12    Stockholder Litigation.    Until the earlier of the termination of this Agreement in accordance with its terms or the Effective Time, each party shall give the other party the opportunity to participate in the defense or settlement of any stockholder litigation relating to this Agreement or any of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement, and shall not settle any such litigation without the other party's prior written consent, which will not be unreasonably withheld or delayed.

        7.13    Indemnification.    

        7.14    Acquiror Board.    The Acquiror Board will take all actions necessary to cause its membership, immediately after the Effective Time, to consist of nine persons, seven of whom shall have served on the Acquiror Board immediately prior to the Effective Time (collectively, "Acquiror Board Designees"), and two of whom shall have served on the Company Board immediately prior to the Effective Time and shall be John A. Friede and John Manzetti (collectively "Company Board Designees").

A-39


        7.15    Employee Benefits; Termination of Pension Plan.    

        7.16    Rights Agreement Amendment.    The Acquiror shall take all action necessary so that John A. Freide shall not be an "Acquiring Person" under the Rights Agreement due solely to (a) the consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby, (b) the exercise of stock options currently held by the John A. Freide and any additional stock options granted to John A. Freide by Acquiror in connection with the services provided by John A. Freide as a member of the Acquiror Board or (c) the acquisition of beneficial ownership of any other equity securities of Acquiror representing up to 5% of Acquior Common Stock and which are deposited in, and subject to, the Voting Trust Agreement in substantially the form of Exhibit 7.16 attached hereto (the "Voting Trust").

        7.17    Voting Agreement.    Concurrently with the execution and delivery of this Agreement, John A. Freide shall execute and deliver to Acquiror a Voting Agreement, in substantially the form of Exhibit 7.17(a) attached hereto (the "Voting Agreement").

        7.18    Lock-up Agreements.    The Company shall use its commercially reasonable efforts to cause each person who is required to sign an Affiliate Letter and each employee of the Company (the "Employee Lock-up Signatories") who is a holder of outstanding equity securities of the Company (including, without limitation, stock options and other derivative securities) (collectively, the "Lock-up Signatories") to deliver to Acquiror, on or prior to the Effective Time, a written agreement (the "Lock-Up Agreement") in substantially the form of Exhibit 8.3(f) attached hereto.

A-40



        7.19    Addresses for Option Holders.    Within 30 days after the date hereof, the Company shall deliver to Acquiror a schedule setting forth the domicile address for each holder of Company Options or Off Plan Options.


ARTICLE VIII

CONDITIONS

        8.1    Conditions to Each Party's Obligation to Effect the Merger.    The obligation of each party hereto to effect the Merger shall be subject to the fulfillment at or prior to the Closing Date of the following conditions:

        8.2    Conditions to Obligation of the Company to Effect the Merger.    The obligation of the Company to effect the Merger shall be subject to the fulfillment at or prior to the Closing Date of the following conditions:

A-41


        8.3    Conditions to Obligation of Acquiror and Merger Sub to Effect the Merger.    The obligations of Acquiror and Merger Sub to effect the Merger shall be subject to the fulfillment at or prior to the Closing Date of the following conditions:

A-42



ARTICLE IX

TERMINATION; FEES AND EXPENSES

        9.1    Termination by Mutual Consent.    This Agreement may be terminated and the Merger may be abandoned at any time prior to the Effective Time by the mutual written agreement of the parties hereto.

A-43



        9.2    Termination by Acquiror or the Company.    This Agreement may be terminated and the Merger may be abandoned by either Acquiror or the Company if (a) the Merger shall not have been consummated by April 16, 2004 (the "Termination Date"), provided that the terminating party shall not have breached in any material respect its obligations under this Agreement in any manner that shall have proximately contributed to the failure to consummate the Merger by the Termination Date; (b) at the Company Meeting (including any adjournment or postponement permitted by this Agreement), at which a vote on the Company Voting Proposal is taken, the requisite vote of the stockholders of the Company in favor of the Merger shall not have been obtained (provided, however, that the right to terminate this Agreement under this Section 9.2(b) shall not be available to any party whose failure to fulfill any obligation under this Agreement has been a principal cause of or resulted in the failure to obtain such requisite vote), (c) at the Acquiror Meeting (including any adjournment or postponement permitted by this Agreement), at which a vote on the issuance of Acquiror Common Stock in the Merger and related matters is taken, the requisite vote of the stockholders of Acquiror in favor of the issuance of Acquiror Common Stock in the Merger and related matters shall not have been obtained (provided, however, that the right to terminate this Agreement under this Section 9.2(c) shall not be available to any party whose failure to fulfill any obligation under this Agreement has been a principal cause of or resulted in the failure to obtain such requisite vote) or (d) a United States federal or state court of competent jurisdiction or United States federal or state governmental, regulatory or administrative agency or commission shall have issued an order, decree or ruling or taken any other action permanently restraining, enjoining or otherwise prohibiting the transactions contemplated by this Agreement and such order, decree, ruling or other action shall have become final and non-appealable; provided that the party seeking to terminate this Agreement pursuant to clause (d) above shall have used all reasonable efforts to remove such order, decree or ruling.

        9.3    Termination by the Company.    This Agreement may be terminated and the Merger may be abandoned at any time prior to the Effective Time by action of the Company Board if (a) there has been a breach by Acquiror or Merger Sub of any representation or warranty contained in this Agreement which breach has not been cured in all material respects and which has caused any of the conditions set forth in Section 8.2(a) to be incapable of being satisfied by the Termination Date or (b) there has been a material breach of any of the covenants or agreements set forth in this Agreement on the part of Acquiror which has not been cured in all material respects and which has caused any of the conditions set forth in Section 8.2(a) to be incapable of being satisfied by the Termination Date.

        9.4    Termination by Acquiror.    This Agreement may be terminated and the Merger may be abandoned at any time prior to the Effective Time by action of the Acquiror Board if (a) there has been a breach by the Company of any representation or warranty contained in this Agreement which has not been cured in all material respects and which has caused any of the conditions set forth in Section 8.3(a) to be incapable of being satisfied by the Termination Date or (b) there has been a material breach of any of the covenants or agreements set forth in this Agreement on the part of the Company which has not been cured in all material respects and which has caused any of the conditions set forth in Section 8.3(a) to be incapable of being satisfied by the Termination Date.

        9.5    Effect of Termination and Abandonment.    In the event of termination of this Agreement and the abandonment of the Merger pursuant to this Article IX, all obligations of the parties hereto shall terminate, except the obligations of the parties pursuant to Section 9.6 hereof.

        9.6    Fees and Expenses.    

A-44



ARTICLE X

AMENDMENT AND WAIVER

        10.1    Amendment.    This Agreement may not be amended except by an instrument in writing signed on behalf of each of the parties hereto. Such amendment may take place at any time prior to

A-45


the Closing Date, and, subject to applicable law, whether before or after approval by the stockholders of the Company or Acquiror (if required).

        10.2    Waiver.    At any time prior to the Effective Time, the parties hereto may (a) extend the time for the performance of any of the obligations or other acts of the other parties hereto, (b) waive any inaccuracies in the representations and warranties contained herein or in any document delivered pursuant thereto and (c) waive compliance with any of the agreements or conditions contained herein. Any agreement on the part of a party hereto to any such extension or waiver shall be valid only if set forth in an instrument in writing signed on behalf of such party.


ARTICLE XI

DEFINITIONS

        As used herein, the following terms shall have the following meanings:

        "Acquiror Material Adverse Effect" shall have the meaning provided in Section 4.1 hereof.

        "Acquiror SEC Reports" shall have the meaning provided in Section 4.5 hereof.

        "Affiliate" means, with respect to any Person, any other Person, directly or indirectly, controlling, controlled by, or under common control with, such Person. For purposes of this definition, the term "control" (including the correlative terms "controlling", "controlled by" and "under common control with") means the possession, direct or indirect, of the power to direct or cause the direction of the management and policies of a Person, whether through the ownership of voting securities, by contract or otherwise.

        "Company Material Adverse Effect" shall have the meaning provided in Section 5.1 hereof.

        "Employee Benefit Plan" means any: (i) employee pension benefit plan as defined in Section 3(2) of ERISA; (ii) multiemployer plan as defined in Section 3(37) of ERISA; (iii) employee welfare benefit plan as defined in Section 3(1) of ERISA; and (iv) any stock option, bonus, stock purchase, or insurance plan and any severance or termination pay plan or policy in which employees, spouses or dependents participate.

        "ERISA" means the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended, and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder.

        "Exchange Act" means the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder.

        "GAAP" means generally accepted accounting principles in effect in the United States of America from time to time.

        "Governmental Authority" means any nation or government, any state, regional, local or other political subdivision thereof, and any entity or official exercising executive, legislative, judicial, regulatory or administrative functions of or pertaining to government.

        "HSR Act" means the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976, as amended.

        "Intellectual Property" shall mean any or all of the following and all rights in, arising out of, or associated therewith: (i) all United States, international, regional and foreign patents and applications therefor and all reissues, divisions, renewals, extensions, provisionals, continuations and continuations-in-part thereof; (ii) all inventions (whether patentable or not), invention disclosures, improvements, drug candidates, trade secrets, proprietary information, know how, technology, technical data, non-technical data, formula, methods, techniques, financial data, and customer lists, and all documentation relating to any of the foregoing; (iii) all copyrights, copyright registrations and applications therefor, and all other rights corresponding thereto throughout the world; (iv) all industrial

A-46



designs and any registrations and applications therefor throughout the world; (v) all trade names, logos, common law trademarks and service marks, trademark and service mark registrations and applications therefor throughout the world; (vi) all databases and data collections and all rights therein throughout the world; and (vii) any similar or equivalent rights to any of the foregoing anywhere in the world.

        "knowledge" means, (i) with respect to the Company, the actual knowledge, after reasonable inquiry, of John Manzetti, John A. Friede, David Haffner, William Wells, Fred Marroni, Joseph Argyros and Francis Dobscha (provided that such reasonable inquiry by Messrs. Wells, Marroni, Argyros and Dobscha shall only relate to the respective areas of supervision and responsibility within the Company thereof) and (ii) with respect to Acquiror, the actual knowledge, after reasonable inquiry, of L. Michael Cutrer, Alan Edrick, Allan Green and Elliot Lebowitz (provided that such reasonable inquiry by Messrs. Green and Lebowitz shall only relate to the respective areas of supervision and responsibility within the Acquiror thereof).

        "Lien" means any mortgage, pledge, security interest, encumbrance, lien or charge of any kind (including, but not limited to, any conditional sale or other title retention agreement, any lease in the nature thereof, and the filing of or agreement to give any financing statement under the Uniform Commercial Code or comparable law or any jurisdiction in connection with such mortgage, pledge, security interest, encumbrance, lien or charge).

        "Permitted Liens" means (i) Liens for taxes, assessments and other governmental charges that are not delinquent or that are being contested in good faith and in respect of which adequate reserves have been established, (ii) mechanics', materialmen's, carriers', workmen's, warehousemen's, repairmen's landlord's or other similar Liens securing obligations that are not due and payable or that are being contested in good faith and in respect of which adequate reserves have been established, (iii) Liens reflected in the Current Balance Sheet or created in the ordinary or usual course of business subsequent to date of the Current Balance Sheet, (iv) Liens set forth in Section 11.1 of the Company Disclosure Schedule and (v) imperfections of title and Liens that do not and would not reasonably be expected to detract materially from the value or materially interfere with the present use of the properties subject thereto or affected thereby.

        "Person" means an individual, corporation, limited liability company, partnership, association, trust or any other entity or organization.

        "Registered Intellectual Property" means all United States, international and foreign: (i) patents and patent applications (including provision applications); (ii) registered trademarks, applications to register trademarks, intent to use applications, or other registrations or applications related to trademarks; (iii) registered copyrights and applications for copyright registration; and (iv) any other Intellectual Property that is the subject of an application, certificate, filing, registration or other document issued, filed with, or recorded by any state, government or other public legal authority.

        "Regulation M-A Filing" means any filing pursuant to Rule 165 and Rule 425 under the Securities Act or Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act.

        "SEC" means the Securities and Exchange Commission.

        "Securities Act" means the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder.

        "Tax Returns" means any return, report or other document required to be supplied to a taxing authority in connection with Taxes.

        "Taxes" means all taxes, including, without limitation, income, gross receipts, excise, property, sales, withholding, social security, occupation, use, service, license, payroll, franchise, transfer and recording taxes, fees and charges, windfall profits, severance, customs, import, export, employment or similar

A-47



taxes, charges, fees, levies or other assessments imposed by the United States, or any state, local or foreign government or subdivision or agency thereof.

        "Transaction Documents" means this Agreement, the Indemnification Escrow Agreement, the Voting Agreement, the Voting Trust, and the Affiliate Letters and all other documents to be executed by the parties hereto in connection with the consummation of transactions contemplated hereby.

        "Voting Trust" has the meaning provided in Section 7.16 hereof.


ARTICLE XII

INDEMNIFICATION

        12.1    Indemnification of Acquiror Indemnified Parties.    Each stockholder of the Company, jointly and severally (an "Indemnifying Party"), shall indemnify and hold harmless Acquiror and the Surviving Corporation, and their respective officers, directors, employees, consultants, stockholders and affiliates (collectively, the "Acquiror Indemnified Parties") from and against any and all damages, losses, claims, liabilities, demands, charges, suits, penalties, costs and expenses, including court costs and reasonable attorneys' fees and expenses incurred in investigating and preparing for any litigation or proceeding (collectively, "Damages") which any of the Acquiror Indemnified Parties shall have actually sustained, or to which any of Acquiror Indemnified Parties shall have actually been subjected, relating to or arising directly or indirectly out of any breach or default by the Company of any of its representations or warranties contained in Article V hereof or any covenants or agreements under this Agreement. Any Damages which any Acquiror Indemnified Party shall have actually sustained, or to which any of the Acquiror Indemnified Parties shall have actually been subjected, are referred to herein as "Indemnified Losses".

        12.2    Defense of Third-Party Claims.    An Acquiror Indemnified Party shall give prompt written notice to the Stockholder Representative of the commencement or assertion of any action, proceeding, demand or claim by a third party (each, a "third-party action") in respect of which such Acquiror Indemnified Party will seek indemnification hereunder. Any failure to so notify the Stockholder Representative shall not relieve Indemnifying Parties from any liability that they may have under this Article XII, except to the extent the failure to give such notice materially and adversely prejudices the Indemnifying Parties. The Indemnifying Parties shall have the right to assume control of the defense of, settle or otherwise dispose of such third-party action on such terms as the Indemnifying Parties, acting through the Stockholder Representative, deem appropriate; provided, however, that:

A-48


        12.3    Direct Claims.    In any case in which an Acquiror Indemnified Party seeks indemnification hereunder which is not subject to Section 12.2 hereof because no third-party action is involved, the Acquiror Indemnified Party shall notify the Stockholder Representative in writing of any Indemnified Losses which such Acquiror Indemnified Party claims are subject to indemnification under the terms hereof. The failure of the Acquiror Indemnified Party to exercise promptness in such notification shall not amount to a waiver of such claim except to the extent the resulting delay materially prejudices the position of the Indemnifying Parties with respect to such claim.

        12.4    Limitations on Liability.    

A-49



ARTICLE XIII

GENERAL PROVISIONS

        13.1    Survival of Representations and Warranties after the Effective Time.    Each of the representations and warranties made by the Company in this Agreement or pursuant hereto shall survive after the Effective Time for a period ending on the second anniversary of the Effective Time. Each of the representations and warranties made by Acquiror and Merger Sub in this Agreement shall expire at the Effective Time. Notwithstanding any knowledge of facts determined or determinable by any party by investigation, each party shall have the right to fully rely on the representations, warranties, covenants and agreements of the other parties contained in this Agreement or in any other documents or papers delivered in connection herewith. Each representation, warranty, covenant and agreement of the parties contained in this Agreement is independent of each other representation, warranty, covenant and agreement.

        13.2    Notices.    All notices and other communications hereunder shall be in writing and shall be deemed given if delivered personally, mailed by registered or certified mail (return receipt requested) or sent via facsimile to the parties at the following addresses (or at such other address for a party as shall be specified by like notice):

A-50


        13.3    Interpretation.    The headings contained in this Agreement are for reference purposes only and shall not affect in any way the meaning or interpretation of this Agreement. In this Agreement, unless a contrary intention appears (i) the words "herein", "hereof" and "hereunder" and other words of similar import refer to this Agreement as a whole and not to any particular Article, Section or other subdivision and (ii) reference to any Article or Section means such Article or Section hereof. No provision of this Agreement shall be interpreted or construed against any party hereto solely because such party or its legal representative drafted such provision. Neither this Agreement nor any uncertainty or ambiguity herein shall be construed or resolved against any party, whether under any rule of construction or otherwise. No party to this Agreement shall be considered the draftsman. The parties hereto acknowledge and agree that this Agreement has been reviewed, negotiated and accepted by all parties and their attorneys and shall be construed and interpreted according to the ordinary meaning of the words used so as fairly to accomplish the purposes and intentions of the parties hereto.

        13.4    Entire Agreement.    This Agreement (including the documents and instruments referred to herein and the exhibits and schedules attached hereto) constitutes the entire agreement and supersedes all other prior agreements and understandings, both written and oral, among the parties, or any of them, with respect to the subject matter hereof and shall not be assigned by operation of law or otherwise.

        13.5    Governing Law.    THIS AGREEMENT SHALL BE GOVERNED IN ALL RESPECTS, INCLUDING VALIDITY, INTERPRETATION AND EFFECT, BY THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE APPLICABLE TO CONTRACTS EXECUTED AND TO BE PERFORMED WHOLLY WITHIN SUCH STATE.

        13.6    Waiver of Jury Trial.    EACH PARTY HERETO HEREBY IRREVOCABLY WAIVES ALL RIGHT TO TRIAL BY JURY IN ANY ACTION, PROCEEDING OR COUNTERCLAIM (WHETHER BASED ON CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE) ARISING OUT OF OR RELATING TO THIS AGREEMENT OR THE ACTIONS OF THE PARTIES HERETO IN THE NEGOTIATION, ADMINISTRATION, PERFORMANCE AND ENFORCEMENT HEREOF.

A-51



        13.7    Counterparts.    This Agreement may be executed in two or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original, but all of which shall constitute one and the same agreement.

        13.8    Parties in Interest.    This Agreement shall be binding upon and, except for Sections 3.2 and 3.3 hereof, inure solely to the benefit of each party hereto and, except for such Section, nothing in this Agreement, express or implied, is intended to confer upon any other person any rights or remedies of any nature whatsoever under or by reason of this Agreement.

        13.9    Severability.    Any term or provision of this Agreement which is invalid or unenforceable in any jurisdiction shall, as to that jurisdiction, be ineffective to the extent of such invalidity or unenforceability without rendering invalid or unenforceable the remaining terms and provisions of this Agreement or affecting the validity or enforceability of any of the terms or provisions of this Agreement in any other jurisdiction. If any provision of this Agreement is so broad as to be unenforceable, the provision shall be interpreted to be only so broad as is enforceable.

        13.10    Equitable Relief.    The parties hereto agree that the remedies at law for any breach of the terms of this Agreement are inadequate. Accordingly, the parties hereto consent and agree that an injunction may be issued to restrain any breach or alleged breach of such provisions. The parties hereto agree that terms of this Agreement shall be enforceable by a decree of specific performance. Such remedies shall be cumulative and not exclusive, and shall be in addition to any other remedies which the parties may have at law or in equity.

        IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed as of the date first written above.


 

 

North American Scientific, Inc.

 

 

By:

 

/s/  
L. MICHAEL CUTRER      
Name: L. Michael Cutrer
Title: President and Chief Executive Officer

 

 

NOMOS Corporation

 

 

By:

 

/s/  
JOHN W. MANZETTI      
Name: John W. Manzetti
Title: President and Chief Executive Officer

 

 

AM Capital I, Inc.

 

 

By:

 

/s/  
L. MICHAEL CUTRER      
Name: L. Michael Cutrer
Title: President and Chief Executive Officer

A-52



Annex A-2

         FIRST AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT AND PLAN OF MERGER

        This FIRST AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT AND PLAN OF MERGER (this "Amendment") is made and entered into as of November 25, 2003, by and among NOMOS Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), North American Scientific, Inc., a Delaware corporation ("Acquiror"), and AM Capital I, Inc., a Delaware corporation and wholly-owned subsidiary of Acquiror ("Merger Sub").


RECITALS

        WHEREAS, the Company, Acquiror and Merger Sub entered into the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of October 26, 2003 (the "Merger Agreement"), which provides for the merger (the "Merger") of the Company with and into Merger Sub, which shall continue as surviving corporation in the Merger, on the terms and subject to the conditions set forth therein;

        WHEREAS, on November 4, 2003 Parker/Hunter Incorporated made a demand against the Company for a sum of approximately $2,250,000 (the "Demand Amount") which Parker/Hunter alleges is due in connection with the Merger pursuant to the terms of an engagement letter executed by the Company dated June 2, 2000 (any dispute, claim or controversy arising out of such demand being referred to herein as the "Parker/Hunter Dispute"); and

        WHEREAS, in order to establish a separate escrow fund under the Indemnification Escrow Agreement to secure indemnification obligations to the Acquiror Indemnified Parties under the Merger Agreement in respect of any Damages (including, without limitation, the Demand Amount and anticipated attorneys' fees and expenses incurred in investigating and preparing for any litigation or proceeding) that has been or may be incurred by the Company or the Acquiror Indemnified Parties in connection with the Parker/Hunter Dispute after the date of the Merger Agreement, the Company, Acquiror and Merger Sub desire to amend the Merger Agreement as set forth herein.

        NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing premises and the mutual promises and covenants contained in this Amendment, and for other good and valuable consideration the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto, intending to be legally bound, hereby agree as follows:

        1.     Certain Definitions. All capitalized terms used but not defined herein are used herein as defined in the Merger Agreement.

        2.     Indemnification Escrow Agreement. Section 3.6 of the Merger Agreement is hereby amended and restated in its entirety as follows:

A-53


        3.     Indemnification Escrow Agreement. Section 3.7 of the Merger Agreement is hereby amended and restated in its entirety as follows:

        4.     Definitions. The following definitions are hereby added to Article XI of the Merger Agreement:

        5.     Indemnification of Acquiror Indemnified Parties. Section 12.1 of the Merger Agreement is hereby amended and restated in its entirety as follows:

A-54


        6.     Limitations on Liability. Section 12.4 of the Merger Agreement is hereby amended and restated in its entirety as follows:

A-55


        7.     Exhibit 3.5; Form of Indemnification Escrow Agreement. On or prior to the Closing, the parties hereto shall modify the form of Indemnification Escrow Agreement attached to the Merger Agreement as Exhibit 3.5 (a) to provide for the establishment, maintenance and administration by the Escrow Agent of the Special Escrow Fund for the sole purpose of satisfying Claims (as defined in the Indemnification Escrow Agreement) arising out of the Parker/Hunter Dispute and (b) to provide, in form and substance reasonably satisfactory to the Company and Acquiror, that the Stockholder Representative will be entitled to be indemnified out of any funds remaining in the General Escrow Fund after any required distributions to the Acquiror Indemnified Parties and the Escrow Agent, but prior to any distributions to the Stockholders (as defined in the Escrow Agreement), to cover any losses that may incurred by the Stockholder Representative as a result of actions or inactions taken by the Stockholder Representative in such capacity, other than losses for which indemnification would be inappropriate (e.g., losses resulting from willful misconduct, gross negligence or bad faith). For purposes of clause (a) of this Section 7, the Special Escrow Fund shall be established, maintained and administered pursuant to provisions substantially similar to the provisions relating to the establishment, maintenance and administration of the Escrow Fund as set forth in the form of Indemnification Escrow Agreement attached as Exhibit 3.5 to the Merger Agreement on the date hereof, except as set forth below:

A-56


        8.     Effect on Merger Agreement. Except as set forth in this Amendment, the terms and provisions of the Merger Agreement are hereby ratified and declared to be in full force and effect.

        9.     Acknowledgement of No Company Material Adverse Effect. Each of the parties hereto hereby acknowledges and agrees that no breach or alleged breach by the Company of any representation and warranty, covenant or agreement contained in the Merger Agreement which relates to or arises out of the Parker/Hunter Dispute shall individually, or when taken together with any other breach or alleged breach by the Company of any representation and warranty, covenant or agreement contained in the Merger Agreement, be deemed to constitute a Company Material Adverse Effect.

        10.   General Provisions. This Amendment shall become effective upon its execution, which may occur in one or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument. This Amendment shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Delaware applicable to contracts executed and to be performed wholly within such State. Captions and paragraph headings are used herein for convenience only, are not a part of this Amendment or the Merger Agreement as amended by this Amendment and shall not be used in construing either document. Other than the reference to the Merger Agreement contained in the first recital of this Amendment, each reference to the Merger Agreement and any agreement contemplated thereby or executed in connection therewith, whether or not accompanied by reference to this Amendment, shall be deemed a reference to the Merger Agreement as amended by this Amendment.

A-57


        IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this First Amendment to Agreement and Plan of Merger to be duly executed as of the day and year first written above.

    North American Scientific, Inc.

 

 

By:

/s/  
L. MICHAEL CUTRER      
Name: L. Michael Cutrer
Title: President and Chief Executive Officer

 

 

NOMOS Corporation

 

 

By:

/s/  
JOHN W. MANZETTI      
Name: John W. Manzetti
Title: President and Chief Executive Officer

 

 

AM Capital I, Inc.

 

 

By:

/s/  
L. MICHAEL CUTRER      
Name: L. Michael Cutrer
Title: President

A-58



SECOND AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT AND PLAN OF MERGER

        This SECOND AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT AND PLAN OF MERGER (this "Amendment") is made and entered into as of March 2, 2003, by and among NOMOS Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), North American Scientific, Inc., a Delaware corporation ("Acquiror"), and AM Capital I, Inc., a Delaware corporation and wholly-owned subsidiary of Acquiror ("Merger Sub").

RECITALS

        WHEREAS, the Company, Acquiror and Merger Sub entered into the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of October 26, 2003, as amended by the First Amendment to Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of November 25, 2003 (the "Merger Agreement");

        WHEREAS, the Company, Acquiror and Merger Sub desire to amend the Merger Agreement as set forth herein.

        NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing premises and the mutual promises and covenants contained in this Amendment, and for other good and valuable consideration the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto, intending to be legally bound, hereby agree as follows:

        1.     Certain Definitions. All capitalized terms used but not defined herein are used herein as defined in the Merger Agreement.

        2.     Amendment; Termination Date. Section 9.2 of the Merger Agreement is hereby amended by deleting "April 16, 2004" from the third line thereof and substituting "June 18, 2004" therefor.

        3.     Effect on Merger Agreement. Except as set forth in this Amendment, the terms and provisions of the Merger Agreement are hereby ratified and declared to be in full force and effect.

        4.     General Provisions. This Amendment shall become effective upon its execution, which may occur in one or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument. This Amendment shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Delaware applicable to contracts executed and to be performed wholly within such State. Captions and paragraph headings are used herein for convenience only, are not a part of this Amendment or the Merger Agreement as amended by this Amendment and shall not be used in construing either document. Other than the reference to the Merger Agreement contained in the first recital of this Amendment, each reference to the Merger Agreement and any agreement contemplated thereby or executed in connection therewith, whether or not accompanied by reference to this Amendment, shall be deemed a reference to the Merger Agreement as amended by this Amendment.

A-59



        IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Second Amendment to Agreement and Plan of Merger to be duly executed as of the day and year first written above.

    North American Scientific, Inc.

 

 

By:

/s/  
L. MICHAEL CUTRER      
Name: L. Michael Cutrer
Title: President and Chief Executive Officer

 

 

NOMOS Corporation

 

 

By:

/s/  
JOHN W. MANZETTI      
Name: John W. Manzetti
Title: President and Chief Executive Officer

 

 

AM Capital I, Inc.

 

 

By:

/s/  
L. MICHAEL CUTRER      
Name: L. Michael Cutrer
Title: President

A-60



Annex B


VOTING AGREEMENT

        This VOTING AGREEMENT (this "Agreement") is made and entered into as of October 26, 2003 by and among North American Scientific, Inc., a Delaware corporation ("Acquiror"), and John A. Friede (the "Company Chairman").


RECITALS

        A.    Acquiror, AM Capital I, Inc. ("Merger Sub"), a Delaware corporation and wholly-owned subsidiary of Acquiror, and NOMOS Corporation, a Delaware corporation ("Company"), have entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the "Merger Agreement") as of the date hereof, which provides for the merger (the "Merger") of Company with and into Merger Sub, which shall continue as surviving corporation in the Merger.

        B.    As of the date hereof, the Company Chairman is the "beneficial owner" (as defined below) of such number of Company Shares (as defined below) as is set forth on the signature page of this Agreement.

        C.    As an inducement and condition to entering into the Merger Agreement, Acquiror has required that Company Chairman agree, and Company Chairman has agreed, to enter into this Agreement.

        D.    In consideration of the execution of the Merger Agreement by Acquiror, Company Chairman is hereby agreeing, from and after the date hereof until the Company Shares Expiration Date (as defined below) to vote, or cause to be voted the Company Shares (as defined below) and other such shares of capital stock of Company over which Company Chairman has voting power in favor of, and otherwise support, the adoption of the Merger Agreement (as the same may be amended from time to time), and each of the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement.

        E.    In consideration of the execution of the Merger Agreement by Acquiror, Company Chairman is hereby agreeing, from and after the Closing Date until the Acquiror Shares Expiration Date: (i) to vote, or cause to be voted, the Acquiror Shares (as defined below) over which Company Chairman has voting power so as to elect the individuals nominated by a majority of the Acquiror Board Designees to the Acquiror Board, (ii) not to acquire beneficial ownership or enter into any written or unwritten agreement or arrangement to acquire any securities of Acquiror other than (x) Acquiror Shares acquired in connection with the Merger, (y) Acquiror Shares acquired as a result of the exercise of stock options (A) held by Company Chairman as of the Closing Date of the Merger or (B) granted to the Company Chairman by the Acquiror in connection with the services provided by Company Chairman as a member of the Board of Directors of the Acquiror and (z) securities of Acquiror that are subject to the Voting Trust (as defined below), and (iii) not to vote, or cause not to be voted, all Acquiror Shares over which Company Chairman has voting power in favor of any Unapproved Transaction (as defined below).

        NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto, intending to be legally bound, hereby agree as follows:

B-1


B-2


B-3


B-4


B-5


B-6



B-7


        IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be duly executed on the day and year first above written.


NORTH AMERICAN SCIENTIFIC, INC.

 

COMPANY CHAIRMAN

By:

 

/s/  
L. MICHAEL CUTRER      
Signature of Authorized Signatory

 

/s/  
JOHN A. FRIEDE      
Signature

Name:

 

L. Michael Cutrer


 

Print Address:

Title:

 

President and Chief Executive Officer


 



 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

Telephone Number

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

Facsimile Number

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

Shares Beneficially Owned:

 

 

 

 

1,510,574.61


 

shares of Company Common Stock

 

 

 

 

164,975


 

shares of Company Common Stock issuable upon exercise of outstanding options or warrants

 

 

 

 

40,101.52


 

shares of Company Series A Preferred Stock

 

 

 

 

1,481,035.40


 

shares of Company Series B Preferred Stock

[SIGNATURE PAGE TO VOTING AGREEMENT]

B-8



EXHIBIT A
COMPANY SHARES PROXY

IRREVOCABLE PROXY

        The undersigned stockholder of NOMOS Corporation, a Delaware corporation ("Company"), hereby irrevocably (to the fullest extent permitted by law) appoints Michael Cutrer, President and Chief Executive Officer and Alan Edrick, Senior Vice Presdient and Chief Financial Officer, respectively, of North American Scientific, Inc., a Delaware corporation ("Acquiror"), and each of them, as the sole and exclusive attorneys and proxies of the undersigned, with full power of substitution and resubstitution, to vote and exercise all voting and related rights (to the full extent that the undersigned is entitled to do so) with respect to all of the shares of capital stock of Company that are owned by the undersigned as of and subsequent to the date hereof until the Expiration Date (as such term is hereinafter defined) (collectively, the "Company Shares") in accordance with the terms of this Irrevocable Proxy. As used herein, the "Merger Agreement" shall mean the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of October 26, 2003, among Acquiror, AM Capital I, Inc., a Delaware corporation and wholly-owned subsidiary of Acquiror ("Merger Sub"), and Company, which provides for the merger (the "Merger") of Company with and into Merger Sub and the other transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement. As used herein, the "Expiration Date" shall mean the earlier to occur of (i) the date that the Merger Agreement shall have been validly terminated pursuant to Article IX thereof or (ii) such date and time as the Merger shall become effective in accordance with the terms and provisions of the Merger Agreement. Upon the undersigned's execution of this Irrevocable Proxy, any and all prior proxies given by the undersigned with respect to any Company Shares are hereby revoked and the undersigned agrees not to grant any subsequent proxies with respect to the Company Shares until after the Expiration Date.

        This Irrevocable Proxy is irrevocable (to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law), is coupled with an interest and is granted pursuant to the Voting Agreement of even date herewith between Acquiror and the undersigned stockholder (the "Voting Agreement") and is granted in consideration of Acquiror entering into the Merger Agreement.

        The attorneys and proxies named herein are, and each of them hereby is, authorized and empowered by the undersigned, at any time prior to the Expiration Date, to act as the undersigned's attorney and proxy to vote the Company Shares, and to exercise all voting consent and similar rights of the undersigned with respect to the Company Shares (including, without limitation, the power to execute and deliver written consents) at every annual, special or adjourned meeting of stockholders of Company and in every proposed written consent in lieu of any such meeting (i) in favor of the adoption of the Merger Agreement (as the same may be amended from time to time), in favor of each of the actions contemplated by the Merger Agreement (as the same may be amended from time to time), (ii) against any matter that is intended, or could reasonably be expected to, impede, interfere with, delay, postpone, discourage, or adversely affect the consummation of the Merger or other transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement (as the same may be amended from time to time) and (iii) against any proposals or offers from any individual, corporation, limited liability company, partnership, association, trust or any other entity or organization, other than Acquiror or any affiliate of Acquiror, concerning an Acquisition Proposal (as defined in the Merger Agreement).

        The attorneys and proxies named above may not exercise this Irrevocable Proxy on any other matter except as provided herein. The undersigned stockholder may vote the Company Shares on all other matters, so long as such vote is not inconsistent with any matters specifically covered by this Irrevocable Proxy.

        Any obligation of the undersigned hereunder shall be binding upon the successors and assigns of the undersigned.

[Remainder of Page Intentionally Left Blank]

B-9


        This Irrevocable Proxy is irrevocable (to the fullest extent permitted by law). This Irrevocable Proxy shall terminate, and be of no further force and effect, automatically upon the Expiration Date.


Dated: October    , 2003

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

Signature

 

 

 

 

Shares beneficially owned:

 

 

 

 

 

 

            shares of Company Common Stock

 

 

 

 

            shares of Company Common Stock issuable upon exercise of outstanding options or warrants

[IRREVOCABLE PROXY]

B-10



EXHIBIT B
ACQUIROR SHARES PROXY

IRREVOCABLE PROXY

        The undersigned hereby irrevocably (to the fullest extent permitted by law) appoints Michael Cutrer, President and Chief Executive Officer and Alan Edrick, Senior Vice Presdient and Chief Financial Officer, respectively, of North American Scientific, Inc., a Delaware corporation ("Acquiror"), and each of them, as the sole and exclusive attorneys and proxies of the undersigned, with full power of substitution and resubstitution, to vote and exercise all voting and related rights (to the full extent that the undersigned is entitled to do so) with respect to all of the shares of capital stock of Acquiror that are owned of record by the undersigned as of the date of any meeting of stockholders of Acquiror called (and at every adjournment or postponement thereof), and as of the date that any proposed action or approval by written consent of the stockholders of Acquiror solicited, for the purpose of the election of directors of Acquiror (collectively, the "Acquiror Shares") in accordance with the terms of this Irrevocable Proxy. As used herein, the "Merger Agreement" shall mean the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of October 26, 2003, among Acquiror, AM Capital I, Inc., a Delaware corporation and wholly-owned subsidiary of Acquiror ("Merger Sub"), and NOMOS Corporation, a Delaware corporation ("Company"), which provides for the merger (the "Merger") of Company with and into Merger Sub and the other transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement. Upon the undersigned's execution of this Irrevocable Proxy, any and all prior proxies provided by the undersigned with respect to any Acquiror Shares are hereby revoked and the undersigned agrees not to grant any subsequent proxies with respect to the Acquiror Shares until after the Expiration Date (as such term is hereinafter defined).

        This Irrevocable Proxy is irrevocable (to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law), is coupled with an interest and is granted pursuant to the Voting Agreement of even date herewith between Acquiror and the undersigned (the "Voting Agreement") and is granted in consideration of Acquiror entering into the Merger Agreement. As used herein, the term "Expiration Date" shall mean the earlier to occur of (i) such date and time as the Merger Agreement shall have been validly terminated pursuant to Article IX thereof or (ii) the second anniversary of the date on which the consummation of the Merger (pursuant to the terms of the Merger Agreement) occurs.

        The attorneys and proxies named herein are, and each of them hereby is, authorized and empowered by the undersigned, at any time prior to the Expiration Date, to act as the undersigned's attorney and proxy to vote the Acquiror Shares, and to exercise all voting consent and similar rights of the undersigned with respect to the Acquiror Shares (including, without limitation, the power to execute and deliver written consents) at every annual, special or adjourned meeting of stockholders of Acquiror and in every proposed written consent in lieu of any such meeting in favor of the election of the individuals nominated by a majority of the Acquiror Board Designees (as such term is defined herein) (or the successors thereto) to the board of directors of Acquiror (the "Acquiror Board") so long as (i) the undersigned or an individual nominated by the undersigned, provided that the undersigned has timely presented such individual to the Acquiror Board Designees (the "Chairman Nominee"), is among the individuals nominated by a majority of the Acquiror Board Designees (unless a majority of the Acquiror Board Designees has reasonably determined that each of the first three individuals nominated by the undersigned to be the Chairman Nominee for such election are not qualified or suitable to be a director of the Acquiror) and (ii) John Manzetti or an individual nominated by the undersigned, provided that the undersigned has timely presented such individual to the Acquiror Board Designees (the "Manzetti Nominee"), is among the individuals nominated by a majority of the Acquiror Board Designees (unless a majority of the Acquiror Board Designees has reasonably determined that each of the first three individuals nominated by the undersigned to be the Manzetti Nominee for such election are not qualified or suitable to be a director of the Acquiror). As used herein, the "Acquiror Board Designees" shall mean the seven members of the Acquiror Board (or

B-11



their successors) after the Effective Time (as such term is defined herein) that were also members of the Acquiror Board immediately prior to the Effective Time. As used herein, the "Effective Time" shall mean the effective time of the Merger which is the time of filing of the Certificate of Merger for the Merger with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware in accordance with the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware or at such later time which the parties to the Merger Agreement shall have agreed upon and designated in the Certificate of Merger for the Merger as the effective time of the Merger.

        The attorneys and proxies named herein may not exercise this Irrevocable Proxy on any other matter except as provided herein. The undersigned may vote the Acquiror Shares on all other matters so long as such vote is not inconsistent with any matters specifically covered by this Irrevocable Proxy.

        Any obligation of the undersigned hereunder shall be binding upon the successors and assigns of the undersigned.

[Remainder of Page Intentionally Left Blank]

B-12


        This Irrevocable Proxy is irrevocable (to the fullest extent permitted by law). This Irrevocable Proxy shall terminate, and be of no further force and effect, automatically upon the Expiration Date.

Dated: October    , 2003


 

 


Signature

[IRREVOCABLE PROXY]

B-13



Annex C


FORM OF VOTING TRUST AGREEMENT

        This VOTING TRUST AGREEMENT (this "Agreement") is made as of                             , 2003, among John A. Friede ("Company Chairman") and the other stockholders of North American Scientific, Inc., a corporation organized and existing under the laws of Delaware (the "Corporation"), who shall join in and become parties to this Agreement (collectively, the "Depositors") and                        ,                         and                         , as Trustees (collectively, the "Trustees").

        WHEREAS, the Corporation entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of October 26, 2003 (the "Merger Agreement"), with NOMOS Corporation, a Delaware corporation ("Target"), and AM Capital I, Inc., a Delaware corporation ("Merger Sub"), pursuant to which Target will merge with and into Merger Sub and the Merger Sub shall continue as the surviving corporation and a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Corporation (the "Merger");

        WHEREAS, as a result of the Merger, Company Chairman the largest stockholder of Target, will become the largest stockholder of the Corporation;

        WHEREAS, Company Chairman has entered into that certain Voting Agreement, dated as of October 26, 2003 (the "Voting Agreement"), with the Corporation, which prohibits Company Chairman from acquiring "beneficial ownership" (as defined in Rule 13d-3 promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) of any Acquiror Shares, as defined in Voting Agreement (such Acquiror Shares being referred to herein, collectively, as the "New Shares"), unless such New Shares are (a) acquired in connection with the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement (collectively, the "Merger Shares"), (b) acquired as a result of the exercise of stock options (i) held by Company Chairman as of the effective date of the Merger or (ii) granted to Company Chairman by the Corporation in connection with the services provided by Company Chairman as a member of the Board of Directors of the Corporation (collectively, the "Option Shares") or (c) deposited into the voting trust created hereunder (the "Trust");

        WHEREAS, with a view to the safe and competent management of the Corporation in the best interests of all the stockholders thereof, the Corporation and the Depositors desire to create the Trust in the manner set forth in;

        WHEREAS, the Depositors desire to enter into this Agreement to achieve the aforementioned objectives; and

        WHEREAS, the Trustees have consented to act as trustees hereunder upon the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth;

        NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants herein, the parties hereto, intending to be legally bound, hereby agree as follows:

C-1


C-2


C-3


C-4


        IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Depositors have hereunto set their hand and seal, and the Trustees, in token of their acceptance hereby created, have hereunto set their hand as of the date first written above.

    DEPOSITORS:

 

 

 

 

 

    

John A. Friede

 

 

    


 

 

    


 

 

    


 

 

    


 

 

TRUSTEES:

 

 

    


 

 

    


 

 

    

C-5


RECEIPT FOR VOTING TRUST AGREEMENT    

        THE UNDERSIGNED CORPORATION HAS RECEIVED A COUNTERPART OF THE WITHIN AGREEMENT, WHICH HAS BEEN DEPOSITED WITH THE UNDERSIGNED THIS        DAY OF                        , 2003.

 

 

NORTH AMERICAN SCIENTIFIC, INC.

 

 

 

 

 

 
By:     
   

Its:

    


 

 

C-6



EXHIBIT A

TRUST CERTIFICATE NO.                           Shares Common Stock,
$0.01 per share par value


VOTING TRUST CERTIFICATE

        THIS IS TO CERTIFY, that John A. Friede (hereinafter referred to as the "Depositor") has deposited under the Voting Trust Agreement described below a certificate or certificates for            shares (hereinafter referred to as "Shares") of Common Stock, $0.01 per share par value, of North American Scientific, Inc., a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Delaware (the "Corporation").

        THE SALE, TRANSFER OR ENCUMBRANCE OF THIS CERTIFICATE IS SUBJECT TO AND RESTRICTED BY THE VOTING TRUST AGREEMENT DATED                            , 2003. A COPY OF THE VOTING TRUST AGREEMENT IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CORPORATION. BY ACCEPTING THE INTEREST IN SHARES OF STOCK EVIDENCED BY THIS CERTIFICATE, THE HOLDER AGREES TO BE BOUND BY THE VOTING TRUST AGREEMENT.

        This certificate (this "Certificate") is issued under and pursuant to, and the rights of the Depositor are subject to and limited by, the terms and conditions of a Voting Trust Agreement dated as of the    day of            , 2003 (the "Voting Trust Agreement"), by and among the owners and holders of certain securities of the Corporation and the Trustees named therein and their successors thereunder (the "Trustees"). A duplicate original of the Voting Trust Agreement has been filed in and will be found at the registered office of the Corporation in Delaware and is and will be open to the inspection of any Voting Trust Certificate holder or any stockholder of the Corporation, in person or by agent or attorney, daily during business hours for any proper purpose.

        Upon the termination of the Voting Trust Agreement, the Depositor, or his registered assigns, shall be entitled to receive a certificate or certificates for the number and class of Shares deposited pursuant to this Voting Trust Certificate (subject to stock split, reclassifications, stock dividend and the like). Until the actual delivery to the Depositor of the certificate or certificates represented or called for hereby, the Trustees shall possess, and shall be entitled to exercise, all rights and powers of absolute owners and holders of record of the Shares deposited hereunder, including the right to vote for every purpose and to consent to or waive any corporate act of the Corporation of any kind, it being expressly stipulated that no voting right, or right to give consents or waivers in respect of such Shares, passes to the Depositor or its assigns by or under this Certificate or by or under any agreement, express or implied.

        IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Trustees have signed this certificate this            day of            , 2003.

        
            , Trustee

 

 

    

            , Trustee

 

 

    

            , Trustee

C-7



Annex D


FORM OF INDEMNIFICATION ESCROW AGREEMENT

        This INDEMNIFICATION ESCROW AGREEMENT, dated as of                            , 200             (this "Agreement"), is made and entered into by and among NOMOS Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), John A. Friede, on behalf of the Company's stockholders (the "Stockholder Representative"), North American Scientific, Inc., a Delaware corporation ("Acquiror"), and U.S. Bank National Association, a national banking association ("Escrow Agent"), in connection with the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of October    , 2003 (the "Merger Agreement"), among the Company, Acquiror and AM Capital I, Inc., a Delaware corporation and wholly-owned subsidiary of Acquiror ("Merger Sub").


W I T N E S S E T H:

        WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 3.6 of the Merger Agreement, the Company, on behalf of its stockholders (collectively, the "Stockholders"), has agreed to make available to Acquiror and the Surviving Corporation an escrow fund to compensate such parties for certain Indemnified Losses (as such term is defined in the Merger Agreement);

        NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing premises and the mutual obligations herein, the parties hereto, intending to be legally bound, hereby agree as follows:

        1.    DEFINITIONS.    All capitalized terms used but not defined herein are used herein as defined in the Merger Agreement.

        2.    ESTABLISHMENT OF ESCROW.    As of the Closing, Acquiror shall deliver, or cause its transfer agent to deliver, to the Escrow Agent for deposit into escrow hereunder (the "Escrow Fund"): (a) a certificate evidencing 10 percent of the shares of Acquiror Common Stock to be issued in the Merger as required by Section 3.6 of the Merger Agreement (collectively, the "Escrowed Shares"), registered in the name of the Escrow Agent as nominee for the Stockholders, and (b) an aggregate amount of cash equal to 10 percent of the aggregate amount of cash to be paid in the Merger pursuant to Section 3.3 of the Merger Agreement as required by Section 3.6 of the Merger Agreement (the "Escrowed Cash"). The Escrow Agent agrees to establish the Escrow Fund in the manner set forth herein. The Escrow Agent shall have no duty to confirm or verify the accuracy or correctness of the amount of any Escrowed Shares or Escrowed Cash deposited with it hereunder.

        3.    MAINTENANCE OF THE ESCROW.    

D-1


D-2


        4.    ADMINISTRATION OF ESCROW FUND.    

        5.    CLAIMS FOR INDEMNIFICATION AGAINST THE ESCROW FUND.    

D-3


D-4


        6.    LIMITATIONS ON CLAIMS FROM ESCROW FUND.    The rights of the Acquiror Indemnified Parties to make any claims against the Escrow Fund shall be subject to all of the limitations set forth in the Merger Agreement, including, without limitation, the limitations set forth in Section 12.4 thereof.

        7.    STOCKHOLDER REPRESENTATIVE.    

D-5


        8.    ACTIONS OF THE STOCKHOLDER REPRESENTATIVE.    A decision, act, consent or instruction of the Stockholder Representative shall be deemed to constitute a decision of all the Stockholders and shall be final, binding and conclusive upon each such Stockholder of the Company, and Acquiror may rely upon any decision, act, consent or instruction of the Stockholder Representative as being the decision, act, consent or instruction of each and every such Stockholder. The Escrow Agent, the Acquiror and the Surviving Corporation are hereby relieved from any liability to any Person for any acts done by them in accordance with such decision, act, consent or instruction of the Stockholder Representative.

        9.    FEES OF THE ESCROW AGENT.    The fees of the Escrow Agent, including the normal costs of administering the Escrow Fund as set forth on the Fee Schedule attached hereto as Annex B, any expenses incurred by the Escrow Agent in performing its obligations pursuant to Section 4(d) herein and all fees and costs associated with the Escrow Agent's administration of Indemnified Losses, shall be paid (i) 50 percent by the Acquiror (out of its own funds), and (ii) fifty percent by the Stockholders (which shall be paid solely out of the Escrow Fund).

        10.    ESCROW AGENT'S DUTIES    

D-6


        11.    LIABILITY OF THE ESCROW AGENT.    In performing any of its duties under this Agreement, the Escrow Agent shall not be liable to any party for damages, losses or expenses, except in the event of gross negligence or willful misconduct on the part of the Escrow Agent. The Escrow Agent shall not incur any such liability for any action taken or omitted in reliance upon any instrument, including any written statement or affidavit provided for in this Agreement that the Escrow Agent shall reasonably and in good faith believe to be genuine. In addition, the Escrow Agent may consult with independent legal counsel in connection with its duties under this Agreement and shall be fully protected in any act taken, suffered or permitted by it in good faith and reasonable reliance on the advice of counsel. The Escrow Agent shall not be responsible for good faith mistakes with respect to determining and verifying the authority of any Person acting or purporting to act on behalf of any party to this Agreement to the extent the Escrow Agent is not grossly negligent.

        12.    SUCCESSOR ESCROW AGENTS.    Any Person that is the successor of Escrow Agent, by merger, consolidation or transfer of substantially all the business of the Escrow Agent, shall be the Escrow Agent under this Escrow Agreement without further act.

        13.    DISPUTE RESOLUTION.    If any controversy arises between the parties to this Agreement, or with any other party, concerning the subject matter of the Escrow Fund or the terms and conditions hereof, the Escrow Agent will not be required to determine the controversy or to take any action regarding it. The Escrow Agent may hold all documents and funds and may wait for settlement of any such controversy by final appropriate legal proceedings or other means as, in the Escrow Agent's reasonable discretion, it may require, despite what may be set forth elsewhere in this Agreement.

        14.    INDEMNIFICATION OF ESCROW AGENT.    Acquiror [(but only to the extent of the amount available from the Escrow Fund)] and the Stockholder Representative, on behalf of the Stockholders (but only out of, and only to the extent of the amount available from, the Escrow Fund) jointly and severally agree to indemnify and hold the Escrow Agent harmless against any and all losses, claims, damages, liabilities and expenses, including reasonable costs of investigation, outside counsel fees, and disbursements that may be imposed on the Escrow Agent, or incurred by it in connection with the performance of its duties under this Agreement, including but not limited to any arbitration or litigation arising from this Agreement or involving its subject matter, unless such loss, claim, damage, liability or expense shall be caused by the negligence or willful misconduct on the part of the Escrow Agent. Nothing contained in this Section 14 shall impair the respective rights of the Stockholder Representative, on behalf of the Stockholders, and the Acquiror against the other.

        15.    RESIGNATION OF ESCROW AGENT.    The Escrow Agent may resign at any time upon giving at least 30 days written notice to the other parties; provided, however, that no such resignation shall become effective until the appointment of a successor Escrow Agent which shall be accomplished as follows: Acquiror and the Stockholders Representative shall use all reasonable efforts to agree on a successor Escrow Agent within 30 days after receiving such notice. If the parties fail to agree on a successor Escrow Agent within such time, then the Escrow Agent shall have the right to appoint a successor Escrow Agent, provided that the successor so chosen shall have capital, surplus and undivided profits of at least $200,000,000. The successor Escrow Agent shall execute and deliver to the Escrow Agent an instrument accepting such appointment, and the successor Escrow Agent shall, without further acts, be vested with all the property rights, powers and duties of the predecessor Escrow Agent as if originally named as Escrow Agent herein. The predecessor Escrow Agent then shall be discharged from any further duties and liability under this Agreement.

        16.    MISCELLANEOUS.    

D-7


D-8


[REMAINDER OF PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]

D-9


        IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed as of the date first written above.

    NORTH AMERICAN SCIENTIFIC, INC.

 

 

By:


Name:
Title:

 

 

NOMOS CORPORATION

 

 

By:


Name:
Title:

 

 

STOCKHOLDERS REPRESENTATIVE

 

 

 


Name:

 

 

U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION

 

 

By:


Name:
Title:

D-10



ANNEX A

STOCKHOLDER LIST

D-11



ANNEX B

ESCROW AGENT FEES

Annual fee of $15,000.00

D-12



ANNEX C

U.S. BANK TRUST NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
U.S. BANK MONEY MARKET ACCOUNTS
U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AND TERMS

        The U.S. Bank money market accounts are U.S. Bank National Association ("U.S. Bank") deposit accounts designed to meet the needs of Global Escrow and other Corporate Trust customers of U.S. Bank Trust National Association. The accounts pay competitive variable interest rates, which are determined based upon the customer's aggregated balance. These accounts are insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.

        Interest rates currently offered on the accounts are determined at U.S. Bank's discretion and may change daily. U.S. Bank uses the daily balance method to calculate interest on these accounts. This method applies a daily periodic rate to the principal in the accounts each day. The average daily balance is calculated by adding the principal in an account for each day of the month and dividing that figure by the number of days in the period. Interest is compounded on a monthly basis.

        The owner of the accounts is U.S. Bank Trust National Association as Agent for its customers. All account deposits and withdrawals are performed by U.S. Bank Trust National Association. U.S. Bank Trust National Association is an affiliate of U.S. Bank.

        For further information, call your account representative at U.S. Bank Trust National Association.

D-13




Annex E



REGISTRATION RIGHTS AGREEMENT

by and between

NORTH AMERICAN SCIENTIFIC, INC.

AND

THE INDIVIDUALS AND ENTITIES LISTED ON THE SIGNATURE PAGES HERETO


Dated as of                       , 200  




E-1


        This REGISTRATION RIGHTS AGREEMENT, dated as of                            , 200            (this "Agreement"), is entered into by and between North American Scientific, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Acquiror"), and the individuals and entities listed on the signature page hereto (individually, a "Holder" and collectively, the "Holders").

RECITALS

        WHEREAS, the Acquiror and AM Capital I, Inc., a Delaware corporation and wholly-owned subsidiary of the Acquiror ("AM Capital"), and NOMOS Corporation, a Delaware corporation ("NOMOS"), have entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the "Merger Agreement") dated as of October 26, 2003, pursuant to which NOMOS will be merged with and into AM Capital; and

        WHEREAS, the parties desire to set forth herein their agreements as to the piggyback registration rights of each of the Holders with respect to such Holder's shares of Common Stock, as part of and as consideration for the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement;

        WHEREAS, the execution and delivery of this Agreement by the Acquiror with the Holders is a condition to closing the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement.

        NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the mutual promises herein made, and in consideration of the representations, warranties and covenants herein contained, and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows:

        1.    Definitions.    

        As used herein, unless the context otherwise requires, the following terms have the following respective meanings:

        "Acquiror" has the meaning set forth in the preamble hereof.

        "Agreement" has the meaning set forth in the preamble hereof.

        "Business Day" means any day except Saturday and Sunday and any day that shall be a U.S. federal legal holiday or a day on which banking institutions in the State of Delaware generally are authorized or required by law or other governmental action to close.

        "Commission" means the United States Securities and Exchange Commission or any other federal agency which shall at some future point in time be administering the Securities Act.

        "Common Stock" means the common stock, par value $.01 per share, of the Acquiror.

        "Exchange Act" means the United States Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder.

        "Indemnified Party" has the meaning set forth in Section 7(c).

        "Indemnifying Party" has the meaning set forth in Section 7(c).

        "Initial Period" means (i) 18 months from the date hereof with respect to the Holder, John A. Friede, and (ii) six months from the date hereof with respect to all other Holders.

        "Holder" or "Holders" has the meaning set forth in the preamble hereof.

        "Losses" has the meaning set forth in Section 7(a).

        "Maximum Offering Size" has the meaning set forth in Section 3.

        "Merger Agreement" has the meaning set forth in the Recitals hereof.

E-2



        "Person" means any individual, corporation, limited liability company, association, partnership, trust or any other entity or organization, including any government entity.

        "Proceeding" means an action, claim, suit, investigation or proceeding (including, without limitation, an investigation or partial proceeding, such as a deposition), whether commenced or threatened.

        "Prospectus" means the prospectus included in any Registration Statement (including, without limitation, a prospectus that includes any information previously omitted from a prospectus filed as part of an effective registration statement in reliance upon Rule 430A promulgated by the Securities Act), as amended or as supplemented by any and all prospectus and all other amendments and supplements to the prospectus, including supplements and as amended by any and all post-effective amendments and including all material incorporated by reference or deemed to be included by reference in such prospectus.

        "Registrable Securities" means (i) the shares of Common Stock or (ii) any security into or for which such Common Stock has been converted or exchanged in connection with a combination of shares, recapitalization, merger, consolidation or otherwise; provided, however, that Registrable Securities shall not include any securities (A) the sale of which shall have been registered pursuant to the Securities Act and which shares have been sold pursuant to such registration or (B) that shall have been sold pursuant to Rule 144.

        "Registration Expenses" means all expenses incurred in effecting any registration pursuant to this Agreement including, without limitation, all registration, qualification and filing fees, printing expenses, escrow fees, fees and disbursements of counsel for the Company and one special counsel for the Holders, blue sky fees and expenses and expenses of any regular or special audits incident to or required by any such registration, qualification and filing.

        "Registration Statement" means any registration statement under the Securities Act on an appropriate form (which form shall be available for the sale of the Registrable Securities in accordance with the intended method or methods of distribution thereof and shall include all financial statements required by the Commission to be filed herewith) which covers Registrable Securities pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement, including the Prospectus included in such registration statement, amendments (including post-effective amendments) and supplements to such registration statement, and all exhibits to and all material incorporated by reference in such registration statement.

        "Rule 144" means Rule 144 under the Securities Act, as such Rule may be amended from time to time, or any similar rule or regulation hereafter adopted by the Commission.

        "Securities Act" means the United States Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder.

        "Selling Expenses" means all underwriting discounts, selling commissions and stock transfer taxes applicable to the sale of Registrable Securities and fees and disbursements of counsel for any Holder (other than the fees and disbursements of one special counsel to the Holders included in Registration Expenses).

        "Selling Holders" means Holders offering Registrable Securities for sale pursuant to a registration effected under this Agreement.

        "Shelf Registration Statement" means any shelf Registration Statement pursuant to Rule 415 under the Securities Act, or any similar rule or regulation hereafter adopted by the Commission, on Form S-3 (or any substitute form that may be adopted by the Commission).

E-3



        "Underwritten Registration" or "Underwritten Offering" means a registration in connection with which securities of the Acquiror are sold to an underwriter for reoffering to the public pursuant to an effective registration statement.

        2.    Piggyback Registration.    

        (a)   If the Acquiror proposes to file a Registration Statement (other than on a registration statement on Form S-4 or S-8 (or any substitute form that may be adopted by the Commission)) with respect to an offering of Common Stock for its own account pursuant to an Underwritten Offering, then the Acquiror shall provide written notice of such proposed filing to each Holder as soon as practicable (but in no event less than 20 days before the anticipated filing date of such Registration Statement). If within 15 days after receipt of such notice, any Holder requests the inclusion in such Registration Statement of some or all of the Registrable Securities held by such Holder, the Acquiror shall use its reasonable best efforts to include such Registrable Securities in such Registration Statement; provided, however, that during the Initial Period (i) each Holder shall only be permitted to participate in such registration if the Acquiror proposes to include the securities of another Person in such Registration Statement and (ii) each Holder shall only be permitted to request the inclusion in such Registration Statement of, and the Acquiror shall only be required to use its reasonable best efforts to include, up to 25 percent of the Registrable Securities held by each such Holder.

        (b)   If the Acquiror acquires another Person pursuant to a merger, asset sale, stock transfer or other acquisition transaction and, in connection with such transaction, the Acquiror proposes to file a Shelf Registration Statement related to the resale of any restricted securities of the Acquiror received by any Person in connection with such transaction, then the Acquiror shall provide written notice of such proposed filing to each Holder as soon as practicable (but in no event less than 20 days before the anticipated filing date of such Shelf Registration Statement). If within 15 days after receipt of such notice, any Holder requests the inclusion in such Shelf Registration Statement of some or all of the Registrable Securities held by such Holder, the Acquiror shall use its reasonable best efforts to include such Registrable Securities in such Shelf Registration Statement; provided, however, that during the Initial Period, each Holder shall only be permitted to request the inclusion in such Shelf Registration Statement of, and the Acquiror shall only be required to use its reasonable best efforts to include, up to 25 percent of the Registrable Securities held by each such Holder.

        3.    Reduction of Offering.    

        If the managing underwriters of an Underwritten Offering advise the Acquiror in writing that, in their opinion, the amount of securities of the Acquiror proposed to be sold in such offering, together with the Registrable Securities requested to be sold by the Holders under Section 2 hereof and any securities requested to be sold by any other Person, exceeds the amount of securities of the Acquiror which can be sold in such offering without adversely impacting the marketing of the securities being sold by the Acquiror in such offering or otherwise materially and adversely impacting the success of such offering, there shall be included in such offering, in the following listed priority, only the amount of such securities of the Acquiror which, in the opinion of such managing underwriters, can be sold (the "Maximum Offering Size") without materially and adversely impacting the marketing of the securities being sold by the Acquiror in such offering or otherwise materially and adversely impacting the success of such offering:

E-4


        4.    Registration Expenses.    

        All Registration Fees incident to the performance of or compliance with this Agreement by the Acquiror shall be borne by the Acquiror. All Selling Expenses relating to the securities registered on behalf of the Holders shall be borne by the Holders included in such registration pro rata among each other on the basis of the number of Registrable Securities so registered.

        5.    Registration Procedures.    

        In the case of each Shelf Registration Statement effected by the Company, the Company will keep each Holder advised in writing as to the initiation of each registration and as to the completion thereof. At its expense, the Company will do each of the following with respect to such Shelf Registration Statement:

E-5


        6.    Holdback Agreement.    

        In the event any registration of equity securities of the Acquiror shall be made in connection with an Underwritten Offering, upon the written request of the Acquiror and an underwriter of Common Stock or other securities of the Acquiror, each Holder agrees not to effect any sale or distribution, including any sale pursuant to Rule 144 under the Securities Act, of any Registrable Securities, and not to effect any such sale or distribution of any other equity security of the Acquiror or of any security convertible into or exchangeable or exercisable for any equity security of the Acquiror (in each case, other than as part of such Underwritten Offering) during the 15 days prior to, and during the 90-day period beginning on, the effective date of the registration statement for such Underwritten Offering; provided that the Holders have such written request at least 15 days prior to the filing date of the Registration Statement and provided, further, that all officers and directors of the Acquiror (other than those participating in the Underwritten Offering) also agree not to effect any such sale or distribution during such period.

        7.    Indemnification.    

        (a)   Indemnification by the Acquiror. The Acquiror shall, notwithstanding any termination of this Agreement, indemnify and hold harmless each Selling Holder and each of its officers, directors, agents and employees, each Person who controls the Acquiror (within the meaning of Section 15 of the Securities Act and Section 20 of the Exchange Act), and the officers, directors, agents and employees of each such controlling Person, to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law, from and against any and all losses, claims, damages, liabilities, costs (including, without limitation, reasonable costs of investigation and reasonable attorneys' fees and expenses) and expenses (collectively, "Losses"), as incurred, arising out of or relating to (i) any untrue or alleged untrue statement of a material fact contained in the Registration Statement, any Prospectus or any form of prospectus or in any amendment or supplement thereto or in any preliminary prospectus, (ii) any omission or alleged omission of a material fact required to be stated therein or necessary to make the statements therein (in the case of any Prospectus or form of prospectus or supplement thereto, in light of the circumstances under which they were made) not misleading or (iii) any violation or alleged violation by the Company of the Securities Act, any state securities laws or any rule or regulation thereunder applicable to the Company and relating to action or inaction required of the Company in connection with any offering covered by such registration, qualification or compliance, except to the extent that any such untrue statement or omission is based solely upon information regarding such Selling Holder furnished to the Acquiror in writing by such Selling Holder stated specifically for use therein.

        (b)   Indemnification by the Selling Holders. Each Selling Holder shall, severally and not jointly, indemnify and hold harmless the Acquiror, its officers, directors, agents and employees, each Person who controls the Acquiror (within the meaning of Section 15 of the Securities Act and Section 20 of the Exchange Act), and the officers, directors, agents and employees of each such controlling Person, to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law, from and against all Losses as incurred, arising out of or relating to (i) any untrue statement of a material fact contained in the Registration Statement, any Prospectus, or any form of prospectus, or in any amendment or supplement thereto or (ii) any omission of a material fact required to be stated therein or necessary to make the statements therein (in the case of any Prospectus or form of prospectus or supplement thereto, in light of the circumstances under which they were made) not misleading to the extent that such untrue statement or omission is contained in any information so furnished by such Selling Holder to the Acquiror in writing specifically for inclusion in the Registration Statement, such Prospectus or such form of prospectus, or in any amendment or supplement thereto; provided, however that in no event shall any indemnity under this Section 7(b) exceed the net proceeds from the offering received by such Holder.

        (c)   Conduct of Indemnification Proceedings. If any Proceeding shall be brought or asserted against any Person entitled to indemnity hereunder (an "Indemnified Party"), such Indemnified Party shall

E-6



promptly notify the Person from which indemnity is sought (the "Indemnifying Party") in writing, and the Indemnifying Party may assume the defense thereof, including the employment of counsel reasonably satisfactory to the Indemnified Party and the payment of all fees and expenses incurred in connection with the defense thereof; provided that the failure of any Indemnified Party to give such notice shall not relieve the Indemnifying Party of its obligations or liabilities pursuant to this Agreement, except to the extent that such failure shall have proximately and adversely prejudiced the Indemnifying Party.

        An Indemnified Party shall have the right to employ separate counsel in any such Proceeding and to participate in the defense thereof, but the fees and expenses of such counsel shall be at the expense of such Indemnified Party unless (1) the Indemnifying Party has agreed in writing to pay such fees and expenses, (2) the Indemnifying Party shall have failed promptly to assume the defense of such Proceeding and to employ counsel reasonably satisfactory to such Indemnified Party in any such Proceeding or (3) the named parties to any such Proceeding (including any impleaded parties) include both such Indemnified Party and the Indemnifying Party and such Indemnified Party shall have been advised by counsel that a conflict of interest is likely to exist if the same counsel were to represent such Indemnified Party and the Indemnifying Party (in which case, if such Indemnified Party notifies the Indemnifying Party in writing that it elects to employ separate counsel at the expense of the Indemnifying Party, the Indemnifying Party shall not have the right to assume the defense of the Indemnified Party and such counsel shall be at the expense of the Indemnifying Party). The Indemnifying Party shall not be liable for any settlement of any such Proceeding effected without its written consent. No Indemnifying Party shall, without the prior written consent of the Indemnified Party, effect any settlement of any pending Proceeding in respect of which any Indemnified Party is a party, unless such settlement (i) includes an unconditional written release of such Indemnified Party, in form and substance reasonably satisfactory to such Indemnified Party, from all liability on claims that are the subject matter of such Proceeding and (ii) does not include any statement as to an admission of fault, culpability or failure to act by or on behalf of such Indemnified Party.

        (d)   If the indemnification provided for in this Section 7 is held by a court of competent jurisdiction to be unavailable to an Indemnified Party with respect to any loss, liability, claim, damage or expense referred to herein, then the Indemnifying Party, in lieu of indemnifying such Indemnified Party hereunder, shall contribute to the amount paid or payable by such Indemnified Party as a result of such loss, liability, claim, damage or expense in such proportion as is appropriate to reflect the relative fault of the Indemnifying Party on the one hand and of the Indemnified Party on the other in connection with the statements or omissions that resulted in such loss, liability, claim, damage or expense as well as any other relevant equitable considerations. The relative fault of the Indemnifying Party and of the Indemnified Party shall be determined by reference to, among other things, whether the untrue or alleged untrue statement of a material fact or the omission to state a material fact relates to information supplied by the Indemnifying Party or by the Indemnified Party and the parties' relative intent, knowledge, access to information and opportunity to correct or prevent such statement or omission.

E-7


E-8


E-9


SIGNATURES FOLLOW

E-10


        IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the date first above written.


 

 

NORTH AMERICAN SCIENTIFIC, INC.

 

 

By:

 


Name:
Title:

 

 

Holders:

 

 


John Friede

 

 


Corporate Opportunities Fund, L.P.

 

 


Corporate Opportunities Fund (Institutional), L.P.

 

 


Cross Atlantic Partners

 

 


Cross Atlantic Partners II

 

 


Cross Atlantic Partners III

 

 


Cross Atlantic Partners IV

 

 


A. Carey Zesiger

 

 


Alexa L. Zesiger

 

 


Albert L. Zesiger

 

 


Barrie Ramsay Zesiger

 

 


Nicola L. Zesiger

E-11



Annex F


Form of
Affiliate Letter

[DATE]

North American Scientific, Inc.
20200 Sunburst Avenue
Chatsworth, California 91311

Ladies and Gentlemen:

        The undersigned has been advised that, as of the date of this letter agreement, the undersigned may be deemed to be an "affiliate" of NOMOS Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), as the term "affiliate" is defined for purposes of paragraphs (c) and (d) of Rule 145 of the Rules and Regulations (the "Rules and Regulations") of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Commission") promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities Act"). Pursuant to the terms of the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of October 26, 2003 (the "Merger Agreement"), among the Company, North American Scientific, Inc., a Delaware corporation ("Acquiror") and AM Capital I, Inc., a Delaware corporation and wholly-owned subsidiary of Acquiror ("Merger Sub"), the Company will merge with and into the Merger Sub (the "Merger"). All capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall be used herein as defined in the Merger Agreement.

        As a result of the Merger, the undersigned will receive Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share, of Acquiror (the "Acquiror Common Stock") in exchange for the undersigned's shares of Common Stock, par value $0.0001 per share, of the Company (the "Company Common Stock"), Series A Preferred Stock, par value $0.0001 per share, of the Company, Series B Preferred Stock, par value $0.0001 per share, of the Company and Series C Preferred Stock, par value $0.0001 per share, of the Company (the Series A Preferred Stock, Series B Preferred Stock and Series C Preferred Stock of the Company referred to herein, collectively, as the "Company Preferred Stock"). In connection therewith, the undersigned represents, warrants and covenants to Acquiror as follows:

F-1


        The legend set forth above shall be removed (by delivery of a substitute certificate without such legend) if the affiliate delivers to Acquiror (i) written evidence satisfactory to Acquiror that the shares will be sold in compliance with Rule 145 (in which case, the substitute certificate shall be issued in the name of the transferee) or (ii) an opinion of counsel, in form and substance reasonably satisfactory to Acquiror, to the effect that public sale of the shares by the holder thereof is no longer subject to Rule 145 and is exempt from registration under the Securities Act.

        The undersigned's execution of this letter agreement should not be considered to be an admission on the undersigned's part that the undersigned is an "affiliate" of the Company as described in the first

F-2


paragraph of this letter agreement or to be a waiver of any rights the undersigned may have to object to any claim that the undersigned is such an affiliate on or after the date of this letter agreement.


 

 

 

 

Very truly yours,

 

 

 

 

Name:

 

 

 

 

 
           
        Signature:      
               
            Name, if applicable:  
                 
            Title, if applicable:  
                 

Agreed to and accepted this
            day of                             , 200    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

North American Scientific, Inc.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

By:

 


Name:
Title:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

F-3



Annex G


Form of Lock-Up Agreement

North American Scientific, Inc.
20200 Sunburst Avenue
Chatworth, California
Attn:

Re:
NOMOS Corporation

Ladies and Gentlemen:

        The undersigned is an owner of record of certain shares of capital stock of NOMOS Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), or securities convertible into or exercisable for shares of capital stock of the Company ("Company Capital Stock"). North American Scientific, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Acquiror"), and the Company are parties to an Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of October 26, 2003 (the "Merger Agreement"), pursuant to which the shares of Company Capital Stock held by the undersigned are to be converted into the right to receive, as consideration or a portion of the consideration for such shares of Company Capital Stock, shares of common stock, par value $0.01 per share, of the Acquiror (the "Acquiror Common Stock"), in accordance with the terms of the Merger Agreement. Capitalized terms that are used but not defined in this Agreement are used herein as defined in the Merger Agreement.

        In connection with and in consideration of the foregoing, the undersigned hereby agrees that the undersigned will not offer to sell, contract to sell, or sell, dispose of, loan, pledge or grant any rights with respect to any shares of Acquiror Common Stock (any such transaction or action being referred to herein as a "Disposition") acquired in connection with the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement or any options or warrants to purchase any shares of Acquiror Common Stock acquired in connection with the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement (collectively, "Securities") without the prior written consent of Acquiror, for a period commencing on the Closing Date and continuing until the date that is [545] [365] [180] days after the Closing Date (the "Lock-Up Period"). [; provided, that, the undersigned may engage in any Disposition with respect to any Securities held by the undersigned which have been registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, pursuant to that certain Registration Rights Agreement dated                        , 2003 by and among the Acquiror and the other parties thereto][;provided, further, that during the period that is ninety (90) days after the Closing Date until the expiration of the Lock-Up Period (the "Interim Period"), the undersigned may engage in any such Disposition with respect to up to twenty-five percent (25%) of the Securities held by the undersigned at any time and from time to time during the Interim Period.]

        In addition, the undersigned expressly agrees that the undersigned may not, during the Lock-Up Period, engage in any hedging or other transaction which is designed to or could reasonably be expected to lead to or result in a Disposition of Securities, irrespective of whether such Securities would be disposed of by someone other than the undersigned. Such prohibited hedging or other transaction would include, without limitation, any short sale (whether or not against the box) or any purchase, sale or grant of any right (including, without limitation, any put or call option) with respect to any Securities or with respect to any security (other than a broad-based market basket or index) that included, relates to or derives any significant part of its value from Securities.

        Notwithstanding anything contain in the foregoing to the contrary, the undersigned may sell, contract to sell, or sell, dispose of, or otherwise transfer for value or otherwise, the Securities (i) as a bona fide gift or gifts, provided that the donee or donees thereof agree to be bound by the restrictions set forth herein or (ii) to members of the undersigned's immediate family or to any trust for the direct

G-1



or indirect benefit of the undersigned or the immediate family of the undersigned, provided that the transferees thereof agree to be bound by the restrictions set forth herein. For purposes of this Lock-Up Agreement, "immediate family" shall mean (i) the undersigned; (ii) any spouse, lineal descendant or antecedent, father, mother, brother or sister of the undersigned and (iii) any estate, trust, guardianship, custodianship or other fiduciary arrangement for the primary benefit of any one or more individuals named or described in (i) and (ii) above.

        The undersigned also agrees and consents to the entry of stop transfer instructions with the Acquiror's transfer agent and registrar against the transfer of shares of Acquiror Common Stock or other Securities acquired in connection with the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement held by the undersigned except in compliance with the foregoing restrictions. Acquiror, acting alone and in its sole discretion, may waive any provisions of this Lock-Up Agreement without notice to any third party.

        This Lock-Up Agreement is irrevocable and will be binding on the undersigned and the respective successors, heirs, personal representatives and assigns of the undersigned.

        This Lock-Up Agreement shall automatically terminate on the earlier of (i) the expiration of the Lock-Up Period or (ii) such time as the Merger Agreement is terminated in accordance with its terms.

    Very truly yours,

 

 


Exact Name of Stockholder

 

 


Authorized Signature

 

 

[            

Title] [FOR ENTITIES ONLY]

G-2



Annex H

October 25, 2003

The Board of Directors
North American Scientific, Inc.
20200 Sunburst Street
Chatsworth, CA 91311

Gentlemen:

        We understand that North American Scientific, Inc. ("North American Scientific"), AM Capital, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of North American Scientific ("Merger Sub"), and NOMOS Corporation ("NOMOS") will enter into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the "Merger Agreement"), to be dated October 26, 2003, pursuant to which NOMOS will merge with and into Merger Sub and Merger Sub will continue as the surviving corporation and as a wholly-owned subsidiary of North American Scientific (the "Merger"). Upon effectiveness of the Merger, (i) the aggregate number of outstanding shares of common stock, par value $0.0001 per share, of NOMOS ("NOMOS Common Stock") would be converted into the right to receive in the aggregate approximately 3,232,780 shares of common stock, par value $0.01 per share, of North American Scientific ("North American Scientific Common Stock"); (ii) the aggregate number of outstanding shares of Series A Preferred Stock, par value $0.0001 per share, of NOMOS would be converted into the right to receive in the aggregate approximately 454,395 shares of North American Scientific Common Stock; (iii) the aggregate number of outstanding shares of Series B Preferred Stock, par value $0.01 per share, of NOMOS, would be converted into the right to receive in the aggregate approximately 1,122,663 shares of North American Scientific Common Stock and approximately $4 million in cash consideration; and (iv) the aggregate number of outstanding shares of Series C Preferred Stock, par value $0.01 per share, of NOMOS would be converted into the right to receive in the aggregate approximately 453,225 shares of North American Scientific Common Stock and approximately $8 million in cash consideration. In connection with the Merger, North American Scientific and John A. Freide shall enter into a voting agreement, dated as of the date of the Merger Agreement (the "Voting Agreement"), pursuant to which such stockholder will agree to, among other things, vote such stockholder's shares of the capital stock of NOMOS in favor of, and otherwise support (a) the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement and (b) for the period commencing on the date of consummation of the Merger and terminating two years thereafter, the individuals nominated by a majority of the North American Scientific Board of Directors designees (or the successors thereto) from time to time to serve on the North American Scientific Board of Directors. You have provided us with drafts of the Merger Agreement and the Voting Agreement, each of which is in substantially final form.

        You have asked us to render our opinion as to whether the aggregate amount of shares to be issued and cash to be paid (collectively, the "Merger Consideration") by North American Scientific to the holders of the capital stock of NOMOS is fair, from a financial point of view, to North American Scientific.

        In the course of performing our review and analyses for rendering this opinion, we have:

H-1


        We have relied upon and assumed, without independent verification, the accuracy and completeness of the financial and other information provided to us by North American Scientific and NOMOS, including, without limitation, the North American Scientific Projections, the Adjusted NOMOS Projections and the Potential Synergies. With respect to the North American Scientific Projections and the Adjusted NOMOS Projections, we have relied on representations that they have been reasonably prepared on bases reflecting the best currently available estimates and judgments of

H-2



the senior management of North American Scientific as to the expected future performance of North American Scientific and NOMOS. With respect to the Potential Synergies, we have relied on representations that they have been reasonably prepared based on the best currently available estimates and judgments of the senior management of North American Scientific as to the benefits expected to result from the Merger. We have not assumed any responsibility for the independent verification of any such information or of the North American Scientific Projections, the Adjusted NOMOS Projections and the Potential Synergies provided to us, and we have further relied upon the assurances of the senior management of North American Scientific that they are unaware of any facts that would make the information, the North American Scientific Projections, the Adjusted NOMOS Projections and the Potential Synergies provided to us incomplete or misleading. In addition, we have not assumed any responsibility for the independent verification of any such information or of the NOMOS Projections provided to us, and we have further relied upon the assurances of the senior management of NOMOS that they are unaware of any facts that would make the information or the NOMOS Projections provided to us incomplete or misleading.

        In arriving at our opinion, we have not performed or obtained any independent appraisal of the assets or liabilities (contingent or otherwise) of North American Scientific and NOMOS, nor have we been furnished with any such appraisals. We have assumed that the Merger will qualify as a tax-free "reorganization" within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the Internal Revenue Code. We have assumed that the Merger will be consummated in a timely manner and in accordance with the terms of the Merger Agreement without any limitations, restrictions, conditions, amendments or modifications, regulatory or otherwise, that collectively would have a material effect on North American Scientific or NOMOS.

        We do not express any opinion as to the price or range of prices at which the shares of North American Scientific Common Stock may trade subsequent to the announcement of the Merger or as to the price or range of prices at which the shares of North American Scientific Common Stock may trade subsequent to the consummation of the Merger.

        We have acted as a financial advisor to North American Scientific in connection with the Merger and will receive a customary fee for such services, a substantial portion of which is contingent on successful consummation of the Merger. In the ordinary course of business, Bear Stearns and its affiliates may actively trade the equity of North American Scientific for our own account and for the account of our customers and, accordingly, may at any time hold a long or short position in such securities.

        It is understood that this letter is intended for the benefit and use of the North American Scientific Board of Directors and does not constitute a recommendation to the North American Scientific Board of Directors or any holders of North American Scientific Common Stock as to how to vote in connection with the Merger. This opinion does not address North American Scientific's underlying business decision to pursue the Merger, the relative merits of the Merger as compared to any alternative business strategies that might exist for North American Scientific or the effects of any other transaction in which North American Scientific might engage. This letter is not to be used for any other purpose, or be reproduced, disseminated, quoted from or referred to at any time, in whole or in part, without our prior written consent; provided, however, that this letter may be included in its entirety in any joint proxy statement / prospectus to be distributed to the holders of North American Scientific Common Stock in connection with the Merger. Our opinion is subject to the assumptions and conditions contained herein and is necessarily based on economic, market and other conditions, and the information made available to us, as of the date hereof. We assume no responsibility for updating or revising our opinion based on circumstances or events occurring after the date hereof.

H-3



        Based on and subject to the foregoing, it is our opinion that, as of the date hereof, the Merger Consideration is fair, from a financial point of view, to North American Scientific.

Very truly yours,    

BEAR, STEARNS & CO. INC.

 

 

By:

 

/s/  
KEVIN CLARKE      
Senior Managing Director

 

 

H-4



Annex I

[LETTERHEAD OF CIBC WORLD MARKETS CORP.]

        October 24, 2003                        

The Board of Directors
NOMOS Corporation
200 West Kensinger Drive, Suite 100
Cranberry Township, Pennsylvania 16066

Members of the Board:

        You have asked CIBC World Markets Corp. ("CIBC World Markets") to render a written opinion ("Opinion") to the Board of Directors of NOMOS Corporation ("NOMOS") as to the fairness, from a financial point of view, to the holders of the common stock of NOMOS of the Exchange Ratio (as defined below) provided for in an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the "Merger Agreement") to be entered into among North American Scientific, Inc. ("NASI"), AM Capital I, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of NASI ("Sub"), and NOMOS. The Merger Agreement provides for, among other things, the merger of NOMOS with and into Sub (the "Merger") pursuant to which each outstanding share of the common stock, par value $0.0001 per share, of NOMOS ("NOMOS Common Stock") will be converted into the right to receive 0.891 (the "Exchange Ratio") of a share of the common stock, par value $0.01 per share, of NASI ("NASI Common Stock"). The Merger Agreement further provides for the conversion in the Merger of all outstanding shares of the preferred stock of NOMOS into shares of NASI Common Stock or a combination of cash and shares of NASI Common Stock (as to which we express no opinion).

        In arriving at our Opinion, we:

I-1


        In rendering our Opinion, we relied upon and assumed, without independent verification or investigation, the accuracy and completeness of all of the financial and other information provided to or discussed with us by NOMOS, NASI and their respective employees, representatives and affiliates. With respect to financial forecasts and estimates relating to NOMOS and NASI referred to above, we have assumed, at the direction of the managements of NOMOS and NASI, without independent verification or investigation, that such forecasts and estimates were reasonably prepared on bases reflecting the best available information, estimates and judgments of the managements of NOMOS and NASI as to the future financial condition and operating results of NOMOS and NASI. We have relied, at the direction of the managements of NOMOS and NASI, without independent verification or investigation, on the assessments of the managements of NOMOS and NASI as to (i) the existing and future technology, products and product candidates of NOMOS and NASI and the risks associated with such technology, products and product candidates and (ii) the ability of NOMOS and NASI to retain key employees and customers. We have assumed, with the consent of NOMOS, that the Merger will be treated as a reorganization for federal income tax purposes. We also have assumed, with the consent of NOMOS, that the Merger will be consummated in accordance with its terms without waiver, modification or amendment of any material term, condition or agreement and in compliance with all applicable laws and that, in the course of obtaining the necessary regulatory or third party approvals, consents and releases for the Merger, no delay, limitation, restriction or condition will be imposed that would have an adverse effect on NOMOS, NASI or the Merger. In addition, representatives of NOMOS have advised us, and we therefore further have assumed, that the final terms of the Merger Agreement and related documents will not vary materially from those set forth in the drafts reviewed by us. We have neither made nor obtained any independent evaluations or appraisals of the assets or liabilities, contingent or otherwise, of NOMOS or NASI. We are not expressing any opinion as to the underlying valuation, future performance or long-term viability of NOMOS or NASI or any of their respective products or product candidates, the likelihood or timing of any approval by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration of Apomate, or the price at which NASI Common Stock will trade at any time. We express no view as to, and our Opinion does not address, the underlying business decision of NOMOS to effect the Merger nor does our Opinion address the relative merits of the Merger as compared to any alternative business strategies that might exist for NOMOS or the effect of any other transaction in which NOMOS might engage. Our Opinion is necessarily based on the information available to us and general economic, financial and stock market conditions and circumstances as they exist and can be evaluated by us on the date hereof. It should be understood that, although subsequent developments may affect this Opinion, we do not have any obligation to update, revise or reaffirm the Opinion.

        As part of our investment banking business, we are regularly engaged in valuations of businesses and securities in connection with acquisitions and mergers, underwritings, secondary distributions of securities, private placements and valuations for other purposes.

        We have acted as financial advisor to NOMOS in connection with the Merger and to the Board of Directors of NOMOS with respect to this Opinion and will receive a fee for our services, a significant

I-2



portion of which is contingent upon consummation of the Merger. We also will receive a fee upon delivery of this Opinion. We and our affiliates in the past have provided, and currently are providing, services to NASI unrelated to the proposed Merger, for which services we have received, and expect to receive, compensation. In the ordinary course of business, CIBC World Markets and its affiliates may actively trade the securities of NASI for our and their own accounts and for the accounts of customers and, accordingly, may at any time hold a long or short position in such securities.

        Based upon and subject to the foregoing, and such other factors as we deemed relevant, it is our opinion that, as of the date hereof, the Exchange Ratio is fair, from a financial point of view, to the holders of NOMOS Common Stock. This Opinion is for the use of the Board of Directors of NOMOS in its evaluation of the Merger and does not constitute a recommendation as to how any stockholder should vote or act with respect to any matters relating to the Merger.

I-3



Annex J


SECTION 262 OF THE GENERAL CORPORATION LAW OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

SECTION 262.    APPRAISAL RIGHTS

        (a)   Any stockholder of a corporation of this State who holds shares of stock on the date of the making of a demand pursuant to subsection (d) of this section with respect to such shares, who continuously holds such shares through the effective date of the merger or consolidation, who has otherwise complied with subsection (d) of this section and who has neither voted in favor of the merger or consolidation nor consented thereto in writing pursuant to § 228 of this title shall be entitled to an appraisal by the Court of Chancery of the fair value of the stockholder's shares of stock under the circumstances described in subsections (b) and (c) of this section. As used in this section, the word "stockholder" means a holder of record of stock in a stock corporation and also a member of record of a nonstock corporation; the words "stock" and "share" mean and include what is ordinarily meant by those words and also membership or membership interest of a member of a nonstock corporation; and the words "depository receipt" mean a receipt or other instrument issued by a depository representing an interest in one or more shares, or fractions thereof, solely of stock of a corporation, which stock is deposited with the depository.

        (b)   Appraisal rights shall be available for the shares of any class or series of stock of a constituent corporation in a merger or consolidation to be effected pursuant to § 251 (other than a merger effected pursuant to § 251(g) of this title), § 252, § 254, § 257, § 258, § 263 or § 264 of this title:

J-1


        (c)   Any corporation may provide in its certificate of incorporation that appraisal rights under this section shall be available for the shares of any class or series of its stock as a result of an amendment to its certificate of incorporation, any merger or consolidation in which the corporation is a constituent corporation or the sale of all or substantially all of the assets of the corporation. If the certificate of incorporation contains such a provision, the procedures of this section, including those set forth in subsections (d) and (e) of this section, shall apply as nearly as is practicable.

        (d)   Appraisal rights shall be perfected as follows:

J-2


        (e)   Within 120 days after the effective date of the merger or consolidation, the surviving or resulting corporation or any stockholder who has complied with subsections (a) and (d) hereof and who is otherwise entitled to appraisal rights, may file a petition in the Court of Chancery demanding a determination of the value of the stock of all such stockholders. Notwithstanding the foregoing, at any time within 60 days after the effective date of the merger or consolidation, any stockholder shall have the right to withdraw such stockholder's demand for appraisal and to accept the terms offered upon the merger or consolidation. Within 120 days after the effective date of the merger or consolidation, any stockholder who has complied with the requirements of subsections (a) and (d) hereof, upon written request, shall be entitled to receive from the corporation surviving the merger or resulting from the consolidation a statement setting forth the aggregate number of shares not voted in favor of the merger or consolidation and with respect to which demands for appraisal have been received and the aggregate number of holders of such shares. Such written statement shall be mailed to the stockholder within 10 days after such stockholder's written request for such a statement is received by the surviving or resulting corporation or within 10 days after expiration of the period for delivery of demands for appraisal under subsection (d) hereof, whichever is later.

        (f)    Upon the filing of any such petition by a stockholder, service of a copy thereof shall be made upon the surviving or resulting corporation, which shall within 20 days after such service file in the office of the Register in Chancery in which the petition was filed a duly verified list containing the names and addresses of all stockholders who have demanded payment for their shares and with whom agreements as to the value of their shares have not been reached by the surviving or resulting corporation. If the petition shall be filed by the surviving or resulting corporation, the petition shall be accompanied by such a duly verified list. The Register in Chancery, if so ordered by the Court, shall give notice of the time and place fixed for the hearing of such petition by registered or certified mail to the surviving or resulting corporation and to the stockholders shown on the list at the addresses therein stated. Such notice shall also be given by 1 or more publications at least 1 week before the day of the hearing, in a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Wilmington, Delaware or such publication as the Court deems advisable. The forms of the notices by mail and by publication shall be approved by the Court, and the costs thereof shall be borne by the surviving or resulting corporation.

        (g)   At the hearing on such petition, the Court shall determine the stockholders who have complied with this section and who have become entitled to appraisal rights. The Court may require the stockholders who have demanded an appraisal for their shares and who hold stock represented by certificates to submit their certificates of stock to the Register in Chancery for notation thereon of the pendency of the appraisal proceedings; and if any stockholder fails to comply with such direction, the Court may dismiss the proceedings as to such stockholder.

        (h)   After determining the stockholders entitled to an appraisal, the Court shall appraise the shares, determining their fair value exclusive of any element of value arising from the accomplishment or expectation of the merger or consolidation, together with a fair rate of interest, if any, to be paid upon the amount determined to be the fair value. In determining such fair value, the Court shall take

J-3



into account all relevant factors. In determining the fair rate of interest, the Court may consider all relevant factors, including the rate of interest which the surviving or resulting corporation would have had to pay to borrow money during the pendency of the proceeding. Upon application by the surviving or resulting corporation or by any stockholder entitled to participate in the appraisal proceeding, the Court may, in its discretion, permit discovery or other pretrial proceedings and may proceed to trial upon the appraisal prior to the final determination of the stockholder entitled to an appraisal. Any stockholder whose name appears on the list filed by the surviving or resulting corporation pursuant to subsection (f) of this section and who has submitted such stockholder's certificates of stock to the Register in Chancery, if such is required, may participate fully in all proceedings until it is finally determined that such stockholder is not entitled to appraisal rights under this section.

        (i)    The Court shall direct the payment of the fair value of the shares, together with interest, if any, by the surviving or resulting corporation to the stockholders entitled thereto. Interest may be simple or compound, as the Court may direct. Payment shall be so made to each such stockholder, in the case of holders of uncertificated stock forthwith, and the case of holders of shares represented by certificates upon the surrender to the corporation of the certificates representing such stock. The Court's decree may be enforced as other decrees in the Court of Chancery may be enforced, whether such surviving or resulting corporation be a corporation of this State or of any state.

        (j)    The costs of the proceeding may be determined by the Court and taxed upon the parties as the Court deems equitable in the circumstances. Upon application of a stockholder, the Court may order all or a portion of the expenses incurred by any stockholder in connection with the appraisal proceeding, including, without limitation, reasonable attorney's fees and the fees and expenses of experts, to be charged pro rata against the value of all the shares entitled to an appraisal.

        (k)   From and after the effective date of the merger or consolidation, no stockholder who has demanded appraisal rights as provided in subsection (d) of this section shall be entitled to vote such stock for any purpose or to receive payment of dividends or other distributions on the stock (except dividends or other distributions payable to stockholders of record at a date which is prior to the effective date of the merger or consolidation); provided, however, that if no petition for an appraisal shall be filed within the time provided in subsection (e) of this section, or if such stockholder shall deliver to the surviving or resulting corporation a written withdrawal of such stockholder's demand for an appraisal and an acceptance of the merger or consolidation, either within 60 days after the effective date of the merger or consolidation as provided in subsection (e) of this section or thereafter with the written approval of the corporation, then the right of such stockholder to an appraisal shall cease. Notwithstanding the foregoing, no appraisal proceeding in the Court of Chancery shall be dismissed as to any stockholder without the approval of the Court, and such approval may be conditioned upon such terms as the Court deems just.

        (l)    The shares of the surviving or resulting corporation to which the shares of such objecting stockholders would have been converted had they assented to the merger or consolidation shall have the status of authorized and unissued shares of the surviving or resulting corporation. (Last amended by Ch. 82, L. "01, eff. 7-1-01.)

J-4



Annex K


STANDSTILL AGREEMENT

        This Agreement is made as of March 1, 2004 among NOMOS CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), and the undersigned holders of the Company's Series C Preferred Stock (each a "Stockholder" and, collectively, the "Stockholders").

PREAMBLE

        A.    The Company entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as of October 26, 2003, as amended by the First Amendment to Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as of November 25, 2003 (as amended, the "Merger Agreement"), with North American Scientific, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Acquiror"), and AM Capital I, Inc., a Delaware corporation and wholly owned subsidiary of the Acquiror ("Merger Sub").

        B.    The Company's current Certificate of Incorporation grants the Stockholders and the other holders of the Company's Series C Preferred Stock certain redemption rights ("Redemption Rights") with respect to their Series C Preferred Stock that are exercisable beginning March 2, 2004 by the holders of at least fifty percent (50%) of the then outstanding shares of Series C Preferred Stock.

        C.    Due to certain delays occasioned by the preparation and SEC review of the Joint Proxy Statement/Prospectus (as defined in the Merger Agreement), the Company, the Acquiror and the Merger Sub have entered into, or intend to enter into, a Second Amendment to Agreement and Plan of Merger, pursuant to which the Termination Date (as defined in the Merger Agreement) will be extended to June 18, 2004.

        D.    The Company has asked the Stockholders, who collectively hold more than fifty percent (50%) of the currently outstanding shares of Series C Preferred Stock, to agree not to exercise their Redemption Rights prior to the Standstill Expiration Date (as defined below) in order to permit the Company to proceed with the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement (as amended by such Second Amendment to Agreement and Plan of Merger) in reliance upon such non-exercise.

        E.    The Stockholders are willing to agree not to exercise their Redemption Rights upon the terms and subject to the conditions set forth herein, including the agreement that the Company pay, upon the Closing (as defined in the Merger Agreement), the Consideration (as defined below) as consideration to the holders of Series C Preferred Stock for such standstill and as compensation for the lost time value of money and the potential loss of accrued dividends for the period between January 31, 2004 and the Standstill Expiration Date (as defined below).

        Therefore, the parties agree as follows with the intent to be legally bound.

K-1



AGREEMENT

        1.     Non-Exercise of Redemption Rights. Each Stockholder agrees not to exercise its Redemption Rights at any time prior to the earlier to occur of (i) July 1, 2004 or (ii) the termination of the Merger Agreement in accordance with its terms (in either case, the "Standstill Expiration Date"). Any attempted exercise of such Redemption Rights by any Stockholder or any assignee or transferee of any Stockholder prior to the Standstill Expiration Date shall be void and of no force or effect.

        2.     Payment of Consideration.

        3.     Assignments and Transfers. In addition to any other restrictions that may be imposed under law or contract on the ability of any Stockholder to assign or transfer its shares of Series C Preferred Stock, each Stockholder agrees that it shall not sell, pledge, gift, assign or otherwise transfer (in any case, "transfer") any of its shares of Series C Preferred Stock or any rights therein prior to the Standstill Expiration Date unless the transferee thereof first executes a joinder hereto (in form and substance reasonably satisfactory to the Company) expressly agreeing to be bound by the terms and conditions hereof. Any transfer in violation of the foregoing shall be void and of no force or effect.

        4.     Condition to Effectiveness. This Agreement shall not become effective as to any Stockholder unless and until it has been executed by Stockholders holding at least fifty percent (50%) of the currently outstanding shares of Series C Preferred Stock.

        5.     Miscellaneous. This Agreement: (a) may be amended only by a writing signed by each of the parties; (b) may not be assigned, pledged or otherwise transferred, whether by operation of law or otherwise, without the prior consent of the other party; (c) may be executed in several counterparts, each of which is deemed an original but all of which constitute one and the same instrument; (d) contains the entire agreement of the parties with respect to the transactions contemplated hereby and supersedes all prior written and oral agreements, and all contemporaneous oral agreements, relating to such transactions; (e) is governed by, and will be construed and enforced in accordance with, the laws of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania without giving effect to any conflict of laws rules; and (f) is binding upon, and will inure to the benefit of, the parties and their respective successors and permitted assigns. The waiver by a party of any breach or violation of any provision of this Agreement will not operate as, or be construed to be, a waiver of any subsequent breach or violation hereof.

[Remainder of page intentionally left blank]

K-2


SIGNATURE PAGE TO STANDSTILL AGREEMENT (Company)

 

 

COMPANY

 

 

NOMOS CORPORATION

 

 

By:

 

/s/  
JOHN W. MANZETTI      
John W. Manzetti
President and CEO

SIGNATURE PAGE TO STANDSTILL AGREEMENT (Stockholders)

 

 

STOCKHOLDERS

 

 

CORPORATE OPPORTUNITIES FUND, L.P.

 

 

By:

 

SMM Corporate Management, LLC,
General Partner

 

 

By:

 

/s/  
JAMES C. GALE      
    Name:   James C. Gale
    Title:   Chief Investment Officer

 

 

CORPORATE OPPORTUNITIES FUND
(INSTITUTIONAL), L.P.

 

 

By:

 

SMM Corporate Management, LLC,
General Partner

 

 

By:

 

/s/  
JAMES C. GALE      
    Name:   James C. Gale
    Title:   Chief Investment Officer

 

 

CROSS ATLANTIC PARTNERS I, K/S

 

 

By:

 

/s/  
JOHN L. CASSIS      
    Name:   John L. Cassis
    Title:   Partner

 

 

CROSS ATLANTIC PARTNERS II

 

 

By:

 

/s/  
JOHN L. CASSIS      
    Name:   John L. Cassis
    Title:   Partner

 

 

CROSS ATLANTIC PARTNERS III

 

 

By:

 

/s/  
JOHN L. CASSIS      
    Name:   John L. Cassis
    Title:   Partner

K-3



PART II

INFORMATION NOT REQUIRED IN THE PROSPECTUS

Item 20. Indemnification of Directors and Officers

        Article Sixth of NASI's certificate of incorporation provides for the indemnification of directors or officers, in accordance with the bylaws, to the fullest extent permitted by the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware. Article Eight of the bylaws of NASI provides that NASI shall indemnify and hold harmless, to the fullest extent permitted by law, any person made or threatened to be made a party to any legal action by reason of the fact that such person is or was a director, officer, employee or other corporate agent of NASI or any subsidiary or constituent corporation or served any other enterprise at the request of NASI, against expenses, judgments, fines and amounts paid in settlement actually and reasonably incurred by such person in connection with such action. The General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware provides for the indemnification of directors and officers under certain conditions.

        The directors and officers of NASI are insured under a policy of directors' and officers' liability insurance.

Item 21. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules

        (a)   The following exhibits are filed herewith or incorporated herein by reference:

Exhibit No.

  Description
2.1   Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of October 26, 2003, by and among the Registrant, AM Capital I, Inc. and NOMOS, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 2 of the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 27, 2003.
2.2   First Amendment to Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of November 25, 2003, by and among the Registrant, AM Capital I, Inc. and NOMOS.(1)
2.3   Second Amendment to Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of March 2, 2003, by and among The Registrant, AM Capital I, Inc. and NOMOS, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 2 of the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 5, 2004.
3.1   Certificate of Incorporation of the Registrant, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3(i) of NASI's Registration Statement on Form 10-SB, filed August 22, 1995.
3.2   Certificate of Amendment to Certificate of Incorporation of the Registrant, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of NASI's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the fiscal quarter ended July 31, 1998.
3.3   Bylaws of the Registrant, as amended, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3(ii) of NASI's Registration Statement on Form S-8, filed October 18, 1996.
5.1   Opinion of McDermott, Will & Emery regarding the legality of the securities being registered.(1)
8.1   Opinion of McDermott, Will & Emery regarding material federal income tax consequences relating to the merger.(4)
8.2   Opinion of Cohen & Grigsby regarding material federal income tax consequences relating to the merger.(1)
9.1   Form of Voting Trust Agreement between the Registrant and John A. Friede.(1)
10.1   Form of Employment Agreement between the Registrant and John W. Manzetti.(1)
     

II-1


10.2   Voting Agreement, dated as of October 26, 2001, between the Registrant and John A. Friede, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 99.1 of the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 27, 2003.
10.3   Form of Indemnification Escrow Agreement among the Registrant, NOMOS and U.S. Bank.(1)
10.4   Form of Registration Rights Agreement among the Registrant and the parties set forth on the signature pages thereto.(1)
10.5   Form of Affiliate Letter.(1)
10.6   Form of Lock-up Agreement.(1)
10.7   Lease Agreement dated November 30, 1995 between Registrant and Abraham Stricks, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB, filed January 29, 1998.
10.8   The North American Scientific, Inc. Amended and Restated 1996 Stock Option Plan (as amended through April 6, 2001), incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 of the Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-8 (Registration No. 333-61688), filed May 25, 2001.
10.9+   The North American Scientific, Inc. 2000 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 of the Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-8 (Registration No. 333-34200), filed April 6, 2000.
10.10+   The Theseus 1998 Employee, Director and Consultant Stock Plan, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to Form S-8 (Registration No. 333-64892), filed July 11, 2001.
10.11+   Rights Agreement between the Registrant and U.S. Stock Transfer Corporation, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 of the Registrant's Form 8-K, filed October 16, 1998.
10.12   Restated Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of September 22, 2000, among the Registrant, NASI Acquisition Corp., a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Registrant, Theseus Imaging Corporation, Dr. Allan M. Green, Robert Bender, Sally Hansen and Irwin Gruverman, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 of the Registrant's Form 8-K filed October 19, 2000.
10.13   First Amendment to Exclusive Marketing and Distribution Agreement dated February 24, 1999, by and between Mentor Corporation and the Registrant (confidential treatment granted for certain portions thereof), incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Amendment No. 2 to the Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-3, filed December 13, 2000.
10.14   License Agreement, effective as of April 1, 1998, by and between The Board of Trustees of Leland Stanford Junior University and Theseus Imaging Corporation, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Registrant (confidential treatment granted for certain portions thereof), incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 to the Registrant's Form 10-K filed January 29, 2001.
10.15   License Agreement, effective as of July 20, 2001, by and between AnorMED Inc. and the Registrant (confidential treatment granted for certain portions thereof), incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant's Form 10-Q, filed March 5, 2002.
10.16   Employment Agreement, dated October 13, 2000, by and between Dr. Allan M. Green and the Registrant, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.12 to the Registrant's Form 10-K filed January 17, 2002.
     

II-2


10.17+   Employment Agreement, dated April 1, 2002, by and between L. Michael Cutrer and the Registrant, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant's Form 10-Q filed August 28, 2002.
10.18+   Intentionally Omitted.
10.19+   Employment Agreement, dated February 29, 2003, by and between Elliot Lebowitz, Ph.D., and the Registrant, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed March 12, 2003.
10.20*   License Agreement dated May 15, 1995 with Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation.(1)
10.21   Patent License Agreement dated October 21, 1998 with the Board of Regents of the University of Texas System.(1)
10.22   Amendment No. 1 to Patent License Agreement dated February 28, 2002 with the Board of Regents of the University of Texas System.(1)
10.23   License Agreement dated July 20, 1999 with The Regents of the University of California (Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory).(1)
10.24   Amendment One to License Agreement dated June 23, 2000 with the Regents of the University of California (Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory).(1)
10.25*   Amendment Two to License Agreement with the Regents of the University of California (Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory).(1)
10.26   Software License Agreement dated March 27, 2000 with National Research Council of Canada (BEAM 99 computer software).(1)
10.27   Agreement dated February 11, 2002 between NOMOS Corporation and John Friede.(1)
10.28   Copromotion Agreement dated December 8, 2003 between the Registrant and NOMOS.(2)
10.29   Standstill Agreement dated March 1, 2004 among NOMOS Corporation and the holders of Series C Preferred Stock named therein.(2)
21   Subsidiaries, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 21 of the Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on January 28, 2003.
23.1   Consent of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (for NASI).(2)
23.2   Consent of Ernst & Young LLP (for NOMOS).(2)
23.3   Consent of McDermott, Will & Emery (included in the opinion filed as Exhibit 5.1 to this Registration Statement).(1)
23.4   Consent of Cohen & Grigsby, PC (included in the opinion filed as Exhibit 8.2 to this Registration Statement).(1)
24   Power of Attorney.(1)
99.1   Form of NASI Proxy Card.(4)
99.2   Form of NOMOS Proxy Card.(4)
99.3   Consent of Bear, Stearns & Co. Inc.(1)
99.4   Consent of CIBC World Markets Corp.(1)

(1)
Previously Filed.

(2)
Filed herewith.

(3)
To be filed by amendment.

(4)
Refiled herewith.

+
Compensation plan or agreement

*
Confidential treatment requested for portions of this document.

II-3


Item 22. Undertakings.

        (a)   The undersigned registrant hereby undertakes:

        (b)   Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act of 1933 may be permitted to directors, officers and controlling persons of the registrant pursuant to the foregoing provisions, or otherwise, the registrant has been advised that in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange Commission such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Act and is, therefore, unenforceable. In the event that a claim for indemnification against such liabilities (other than the payment by the registrant of expenses incurred or paid by a director, officer or controlling person of the registrant in the successful defense of any action, suit or proceeding) is asserted by such director, officer or controlling person in connection with the securities being registered, the registrant will, unless in the opinion of its counsel the matter has been settled by controlling precedent, submit to a court of appropriate jurisdiction the question whether such indemnification by it is against public policy as expressed in the Act and will be governed by the final adjudication of such issue.

II-4



SIGNATURES

        Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act, the registrant has duly caused this Registration Statement to be signed by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized in the city of Chatsworth, State of California, on the 10th day of March, 2004.

    North American Scientific, Inc.

 

 

By:

 
      /s/  L. MICHAEL CUTRER      
L. Michael Cutrer
President and Chief Executive Officer

        Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, this Registration Statement has been signed on March 10, 2004, by the following persons in the capacities indicated.

Name and Signatures
  Title

 

 

 
/s/  L. MICHAEL CUTRER      
L. Michael Cutrer
  President and Chief Executive Officer and Director

/s/  
ERIK L. JOHNSON      
Erik L. Johnson

 

Interim Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

*

Irwin J. Gruverman

 

Chairman of the Board of Directors

*

Donald N. Ecker

 

Director

*

Dr. Jonathan P. Gertler

 

Director

*

Dr. Allan M. Green

 

Director

*

Mitchell H. Saranow

 

Director

*

Dr. Gary N. Wilner

 

Director
         
*By:   /s/  L. MICHAEL CUTRER      
L. Michael Cutrer, As Attorney-in-fact
   

S-1




QuickLinks

REFERENCES TO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
NOTICE OF SPECIAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
IMPORTANT
NOTICE OF SPECIAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
IMPORTANT
TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE MERGER
SUMMARY
North American Scientific, Inc. (in thousands, except per share data)
NOMOS Corporation (in thousands, except per share data)
NASI Per Share Data
NOMOS Per Share Data
Combined Organization Pro Forma Per Share Data
NOMOS Equivalent Pro Forma Per Share Data(4)
RISK FACTORS
Risks Relating to the Merger
CAUTIONARY STATEMENT CONCERNING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
THE PROPOSED MERGER
INFORMATION REGARDING NASI
INFORMATION REGARDING AM CAPITAL I, INC.
INFORMATION REGARDING NOMOS
OPINIONS OF FINANCIAL ADVISORS
INTERESTS OF CERTAIN PERSONS IN THE MERGER
THE MERGER AGREEMENT
RELATED AGREEMENTS
PRO FORMA FINANCIAL DATA
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED COMBINED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET As of January 31, 2004 (in thousands)
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED COMBINED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS Fiscal Year Ended October 31, 2003 (in thousands, except per share data)
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED COMBINED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS Three Months Ended January 31, 2004 (in thousands, except per share data)
NOTES TO UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED COMBINED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
INFORMATION ABOUT THE SPECIAL MEETINGS AND VOTING
COMPARISON OF STOCKHOLDER RIGHTS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE MATTERS
DESCRIPTION OF NASI CAPITAL STOCK
LEGAL MATTERS
EXPERTS
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION FOR STOCKHOLDERS
WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Report of Independent Auditors
NOMOS Corporation Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements December 31, 2001, 2002, and 2003
TABLE OF CONTENTS
AGREEMENT AND PLAN OF MERGER
ARTICLE I THE MERGER
ARTICLE II THE SURVIVING CORPORATION
ARTICLE III EFFECT OF THE MERGER ON SECURITIES OF MERGER SUB AND THE COMPANY
ARTICLE IV REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES OF ACQUIROR
ARTICLE V REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES OF THE COMPANY
ARTICLE VI CONDUCT OF BUSINESS PENDING THE MERGER
ARTICLE VII ADDITIONAL AGREEMENTS
ARTICLE VIII CONDITIONS
ARTICLE IX TERMINATION; FEES AND EXPENSES
ARTICLE X AMENDMENT AND WAIVER
ARTICLE XI DEFINITIONS
ARTICLE XII INDEMNIFICATION
ARTICLE XIII GENERAL PROVISIONS
RECITALS
SECOND AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT AND PLAN OF MERGER
VOTING AGREEMENT
RECITALS
EXHIBIT A COMPANY SHARES PROXY
EXHIBIT B ACQUIROR SHARES PROXY
FORM OF VOTING TRUST AGREEMENT
EXHIBIT A
VOTING TRUST CERTIFICATE
FORM OF INDEMNIFICATION ESCROW AGREEMENT
W I T N E S S E T H
ANNEX A STOCKHOLDER LIST
ANNEX B ESCROW AGENT FEES
ANNEX C
Form of Affiliate Letter
Form of Lock-Up Agreement
SECTION 262 OF THE GENERAL CORPORATION LAW OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
STANDSTILL AGREEMENT
AGREEMENT
PART II INFORMATION NOT REQUIRED IN THE PROSPECTUS
SIGNATURES

Dates Referenced Herein   and   Documents Incorporated by Reference

This ‘S-4/A’ Filing    Date    Other Filings
5/27/19
10/27/18
10/24/17
4/19/16
1/25/16
9/30/14
5/17/14
10/8/13
6/17/13
11/12/11
10/31/11
12/31/088-K
10/31/0810-K,  10-K/A
10/22/088-K
3/2/08
12/15/04
10/31/0410-K,  NT 10-K
7/1/04
6/18/04
5/4/043,  3/A,  8-K,  8-K/A
5/3/048-K
4/23/04
4/16/04
3/31/04
3/15/04
Filed on:3/12/04
3/11/0410-Q
3/10/04
3/5/048-K
3/2/04425,  8-K
3/1/0410-K/A
2/27/044,  8-K
2/6/043,  8-K,  SC 13G/A
1/31/0410-Q
1/23/0410-K
1/22/04
1/15/04
1/6/04
1/1/04
12/31/034
12/18/038-K
12/8/03
11/25/03
11/5/03
11/4/03
11/1/03
10/31/0310-K,  10-K/A,  4
10/27/03425,  8-K
10/26/03
10/25/03
10/24/03
10/23/03
10/22/03
10/20/03
10/16/03
10/14/038-K
10/1/03
9/30/03
9/23/03
9/22/03
9/12/03
9/5/03
9/2/03
8/29/03
8/28/038-K
8/21/03
8/20/03
8/18/03
8/13/03
8/12/03
8/11/03
8/5/03
8/1/03
7/31/0310-Q
7/28/03
7/24/03
7/9/03
7/8/03
7/7/03
7/2/034,  8-K
6/26/038-K
6/23/03
6/18/03
6/15/03
6/12/03
6/6/03
6/4/03
5/31/03
5/22/038-K
5/21/03
3/28/033,  4,  DEF 14A
3/12/0310-Q
3/2/03
2/13/03DEF 14A,  SC 13G/A
2/12/03SC 13G/A
1/31/0310-Q
1/28/0310-K
1/1/03
12/31/02
11/21/02
11/1/02
10/31/0210-K
10/23/02
10/22/02
10/18/02
9/30/02
8/28/0210-Q
6/28/02
6/19/02
6/3/02
5/21/02
4/1/02DEF 14A
3/31/02
3/5/0210-Q
2/28/02
2/11/02
1/17/0210-K
1/1/02
12/31/01
12/15/01
12/4/01
10/31/0110-K
10/26/01
7/20/01
7/11/01S-8
5/25/01S-8
4/6/01DEF 14A
3/27/01
3/5/01
3/2/01
1/29/0110-K405
1/1/01
12/31/00
12/15/00
12/13/00
10/31/0010-K405
10/19/008-K,  S-3
10/13/008-K,  8-K/A
9/22/00
6/23/00
6/2/00
4/6/00S-8
3/27/00
3/14/00
12/31/99
11/19/99
10/31/9910-K405
9/28/99
8/17/99
8/4/99
7/20/99
3/22/99
2/24/99
1/31/9910-Q
12/28/98
10/22/98
10/21/98
10/16/988-A12G
10/14/98
9/1/98
7/31/9810QSB
4/1/98
1/29/9810KSB40
4/22/97
1/21/9710KSB40
10/18/96S-8
11/30/95
8/22/95
5/15/95
5/2/95
4/20/95
11/29/94
9/7/93
5/4/93
 List all Filings 
Top
Filing Submission 0001047469-04-007576   –   Alternative Formats (Word / Rich Text, HTML, Plain Text, et al.)

Copyright © 2024 Fran Finnegan & Company LLC – All Rights Reserved.
AboutPrivacyRedactionsHelp — Sat., May 4, 6:55:02.3am ET