SEC Info  
    Home      Search      My Interests      Help      Sign In      Please Sign In

Edison Mission Energy – ‘10-Q’ for 6/30/99

On:  Friday, 8/13/99   ·   For:  6/30/99   ·   Accession #:  1017062-99-1438   ·   File #:  0-24890

Previous ‘10-Q’:  ‘10-Q’ on 5/13/99 for 3/31/99   ·   Next:  ‘10-Q’ on 11/12/99 for 9/30/99   ·   Latest:  ‘10-Q’ on 11/8/13 for 9/30/13

Find Words in Filings emoji
 
  in    Show  and   Hints

  As Of                Filer                Filing    For·On·As Docs:Size              Issuer               Agent

 8/13/99  Edison Mission Energy             10-Q        6/30/99    3:300K                                   Donnelley R R & S… 11/FA

Quarterly Report   —   Form 10-Q
Filing Table of Contents

Document/Exhibit                   Description                      Pages   Size 

 1: 10-Q        Quarterly Report Dated 6/30/1999                      28    105K 
 2: EX-10.63    Indenture & First Supplemental                        67    350K 
 3: EX-27       Financial Data Schedule                                2      7K 


10-Q   —   Quarterly Report Dated 6/30/1999
Document Table of Contents

Page (sequential) | (alphabetic) Top
 
11st Page   -   Filing Submission
16Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
27Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K
28Signatures
10-Q1st Page of 28TOCTopPreviousNextBottomJust 1st
 

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 Form 10-Q [X] QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the quarterly period ended June 30, 1999 ----------------------- or [_] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from __________ to __________ Commission File Number 1-13434 Edison Mission Energy (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) California 95-4031807 (State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) incorporation or organization) 18101 Von Karman Avenue Irvine, California 92612 (Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code) Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (949) 752-5588 Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. YES [X] NO [_] Number of shares outstanding of the registrant's Common Stock as of August 13, 1999: 100 shares (all shares held by an affiliate of the registrant).
10-Q2nd Page of 28TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 2nd
TABLE OF CONTENTS Item Page ---- ---- PART I - Financial Information 1. Financial Statements................................................. 1 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations................................................ 14 PART II - Other Information 5. Other Information.................................................... 25 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K..................................... 25 PART III Signatures........................................................... 26
10-Q3rd Page of 28TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 3rd
PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS EDISON MISSION ENERGY AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME (In thousands) [Enlarge/Download Table] (Unaudited) (Unaudited) Three Months Ended Six Months Ended June 30, June 30, --------------------- ----------------------- 1999 1998 1999 1998 ---------- -------- ---------- ---------- Operating Revenues Electric revenues $218,672 $144,402 $ 415,525 $343,199 Equity in income from energy projects 35,254 48,225 95,999 65,792 Equity in income from oil and gas 6,118 4,962 9,760 10,427 Operation and maintenance services 9,328 9,725 17,844 19,802 -------- -------- --------- -------- Total operating revenues 269,372 207,314 539,128 439,220 -------- -------- --------- -------- Operating Expenses Fuel 73,572 41,075 127,647 89,712 Plant operations 47,018 32,871 81,389 62,469 Operation and maintenance services 7,543 6,888 14,013 14,279 Depreciation and amortization 35,597 22,378 59,743 45,160 Administrative and general 32,567 32,990 69,064 57,162 -------- -------- --------- -------- Total operating expenses 196,297 136,202 351,856 268,782 -------- -------- --------- -------- Income from operations 73,075 71,112 187,272 170,438 -------- -------- --------- -------- Other Income (Expense) Interest and other income 12,792 8,995 20,584 22,771 Interest expense (78,873) (45,160) (123,392) (90,885) Dividends on preferred securities (4,145) (3,304) (7,378) (6,601) -------- -------- --------- -------- Total other income (expense) (70,226) (39,469) (110,186) (74,715) -------- -------- --------- -------- Income before income taxes 2,849 31,643 77,086 95,723 Provision (benefit) for income taxes (2,626) 13,055 13,675 39,435 -------- -------- --------- -------- Income before change in accounting principle $ 5,475 $ 18,588 $ 63,411 $ 56,288 Cumulative effect on prior years of change in accounting for start-up costs -- -- (13,840) -- -------- -------- --------- -------- Net Income $ 5,475 $ 18,588 $ 49,571 $ 56,288 ======== ======== ========= ======== The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements. 1
10-Q4th Page of 28TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 4th
EDISON MISSION ENERGY AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (In thousands) [Enlarge/Download Table] (Unaudited) (Unaudited) Three Months Ended Six Months Ended June 30, June 30, ---------------------- -------------------- 1999 1998 1999 1998 ---------- --------- --------- -------- Net Income $ 5,475 $18,588 $ 49,571 $56,288 Other comprehensive income (expense), net of tax: Foreign currency translation adjustments, net of income tax benefit (expense) of $1,416 and $199 for the three months and $2,794 and $(900) for the six months ended June 30, 1999 and 1998, respectively (29,032) (7,577) (41,657) 738 -------- ------- -------- ------- Comprehensive Income (Loss) $(23,557) $11,011 $ 7,914 $57,026 ======== ======= ======== ======= The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements. 2
10-Q5th Page of 28TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 5th
EDISON MISSION ENERGY AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (In thousands) [Download Table] (Unaudited) June 30, December 31, 1999 1998 ----------- ------------ Assets Current Assets Cash and cash equivalents $ 808,280 $ 459,178 Accounts receivable - trade 98,770 74,403 Accounts receivable - affiliates 29,193 13,871 Inventory 61,395 13,000 Prepaid expenses and other 41,656 46,864 ---------- ---------- Total current assets 1,039,294 607,316 ---------- ---------- Investments Energy projects 1,887,859 1,163,597 Oil and gas 68,987 62,949 ---------- ---------- Total investments 1,956,846 1,226,546 ---------- ---------- Property, Plant and Equipment 5,016,679 3,125,747 Less accumulated depreciation and amortization 300,609 250,934 ---------- ---------- Net property, plant and equipment 4,716,070 2,874,813 ---------- ---------- Other Assets Goodwill 288,090 308,051 Restricted cash and other 157,891 141,390 ---------- ---------- Total other assets 445,981 449,441 ---------- ---------- Total Assets $8,158,191 $5,158,116 ========== ========== The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements. 3
10-Q6th Page of 28TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 6th
EDISON MISSION ENERGY AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (In thousands) [Download Table] (Unaudited) June 30, December 31, 1999 1998 ----------- ------------ Liabilities and Shareholder's Equity Current Liabilities Accounts payable - affiliates $ 8,489 $ 8,339 Accounts payable and accrued liabilities 140,994 99,062 Accrued incentive compensation 135,852 112,652 Interest payable 62,995 56,708 Short-term obligations 701,899 -- Current maturities of long-term obligations 101,552 194,586 ---------- ---------- Total current liabilities 1,151,781 471,347 ---------- ---------- Long-Term Obligations Net of Current Maturities 4,161,114 2,396,360 ---------- ---------- Long-Term Deferred Liabilities Deferred taxes and tax credits 612,630 613,009 Deferred revenue 525,418 490,471 Other 89,717 79,369 ---------- ---------- Total long-term deferred liabilities 1,227,765 1,182,849 ---------- ---------- Total Liabilities 6,540,660 4,050,556 ---------- ---------- Preferred Securities of Subsidiaries: Company-obligated mandatorily redeemable security of partnership holding solely parent debentures 150,000 150,000 ---------- ---------- Subject to mandatory redemption 84,032 -- ---------- ---------- Not subject to mandatory redemption 118,103 -- ---------- ---------- Commitments and Contingencies (Note 5) Shareholder's Equity Common stock, no par value; 10,000 shares authorized; 100 shares issued and outstanding 64,130 64,130 Additional paid-in capital 929,406 629,406 Retained earnings 283,838 234,345 Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) (11,978) 29,679 ---------- ---------- Total Shareholder's Equity 1,265,396 957,560 ---------- ---------- Total Liabilities and Shareholder's Equity $8,158,191 $5,158,116 ========== ========== The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements. 4
10-Q7th Page of 28TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 7th
EDISON MISSION ENERGY AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (In thousands) [Download Table] (Unaudited) Six Months Ended June 30, ------------------------- 1999 1998 ----------- ---------- Cash Flows From Operating Activities Net income $ 49,571 $ 56,288 Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities Equity in income from energy projects (95,999) (65,792) Equity in income from oil and gas (9,760) (10,427) Distributions from energy projects 55,861 51,222 Distributions from oil and gas 400 19,112 Depreciation and amortization 59,743 45,160 Deferred taxes and tax credits 16,937 37,194 Cumulative effect on prior years of change in accounting for start-up costs 13,840 -- (Increase) decrease in accounts receivable (40,189) 5,895 Decrease in prepaid expenses and other 393 4,236 Increase (decrease) in accounts payable and accrued liabilities 6,287 (17,076) Increase in interest payable 51,961 9,739 Other, net (10,760) (11,915) ----------- -------- Net cash provided by operating activities 98,285 123,636 ----------- -------- Cash Flows From Financing Activities Borrowings on long-term obligations 1,810,518 57,541 Payments on long-term obligations (154,658) (45,424) Short-term financing, net 703,499 -- Capital contribution from parent 300,000 -- Issuance of preferred securities 202,212 -- ----------- -------- Net cash provided by financing activities 2,861,571 12,117 ----------- -------- Cash Flows From Investing Activities Investments in energy projects (20,153) (5,381) Loans to energy projects (26,101) (22,937) Purchase of generating station (1,800,355) -- Purchase of common stock of acquired companies (648,246) (4,109) Capital expenditures (70,113) (53,342) (Increase) decrease in restricted cash (6,163) 32,093 Other, net (30,254) 133 ----------- -------- Net cash used in investing activities (2,601,385) (53,543) ----------- -------- Effect of exchange rate changes on cash (9,369) (1,498) ----------- -------- Net increase in cash and cash equivalents 349,102 80,712 Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period 459,178 585,883 ----------- -------- Cash and cash equivalents at end of period $ 808,280 $666,595 =========== ======== The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements. 5
10-Q8th Page of 28TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 8th
EDISON MISSION ENERGY AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS JUNE 30, 1999 NOTE 1. GENERAL All adjustments, including recurring accruals, have been made that are necessary to present fairly the consolidated financial position and results of operations for the periods covered by this report. The results of operations for the six months ended June 30, 1999, are not necessarily indicative of the operating results for the full year. Edison Mission Energy's (EME) significant accounting policies are described in Note 2 to EME's Consolidated Financial Statements as of December 31, 1998 and 1997, included in its 1998 Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 31, 1999. EME follows the same accounting policies for interim reporting purposes, with the exception of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants Statement of Position (SOP) 98-5, "Reporting on the Costs of Start-Up Activities", which became effective in January 1999. SOP 98-5 requires that certain costs related to start-up activities be expensed as incurred and that certain previously capitalized costs be expensed and reported as a cumulative change in accounting principle. This quarterly report should be read in connection with such financial statements. Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current period financial statement presentation. NOTE 2. INVESTMENTS The following table presents summarized financial information of the investments in energy projects and oil and gas accounted for by the equity method: [Download Table] (In thousands) (Unaudited) (Unaudited) Three Months Ended Six Months Ended June 30, June 30, ------------------- ------------------- 1999 1998 1999 1998 -------- -------- -------- -------- Energy Projects Operating Revenues $319,747 $379,045 $762,591 $722,102 Income from Operations 69,855 94,844 242,101 154,775 Net Income 57,552 66,693 198,503 103,014 Oil and Gas Operating Revenues $ 50,370 $ 48,483 $ 93,537 $105,948 Income from Operations 15,115 12,994 23,287 28,682 Net Income 11,970 8,626 19,244 21,106 6
10-Q9th Page of 28TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 9th
NOTE 3. ACQUISITIONS In March 1999, EME Homer City Generation L.P. (EME Homer City), an indirect, wholly owned affiliate of EME, completed a transaction with GPU, Inc., New York State Electric & Gas Corporation and their respective affiliates to acquire the 1,884-megawatt (MW) Homer City Electric Generating Station and certain facilities and other assets associated therewith (collectively, Homer City). Consideration for Homer City consisted of a cash payment of approximately $1.8 billion, which was partially financed by $1.5 billion of new loans (see Note 4). In May 1999, Edison Mission Energy Taupo Ltd. (EME Taupo), an indirect, wholly owned affiliate of EME, completed a transaction with the New Zealand government to acquire 40% of the shares of Contact Energy Ltd. (Contact). Contact owns and operates hydroelectric, geothermal and natural gas-fired power generating plants in New Zealand with a total generating capacity of 2,371 MW. Contact also supplies gas and electricity to customers in New Zealand and has minority interests in two power projects in Australia. Consideration for Contact consisted of a cash payment of approximately $648 million (1.2 billion New Zealand dollars). Financing of the acquisition is discussed in Note 4. Both acquisitions were accounted for utilizing the purchase method. EME's consolidated statement of income for the three and six months ended June 30, 1999 reflects the operations of Homer City beginning on March 18, 1999 and Contact beginning May 1, 1999. NOTE 4. FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS In March 1999, Edison Mission Holdings Co. (EM Holdings), parent company of EME Homer City, closed a $1.1 billion financing and EME closed a $700 million financing. The EM Holdings financing consists of (1) an $800 million, 364-day interest only term loan, (2) a $250 million, five-year interest only construction term loan and (3) a $50 million, five-year interest only revolving loan. These loans are structured on a limited-recourse basis, in which the lenders look primarily to the cash generated by EM Holdings and its subsidiaries to repay the debt and have taken a security interest in the assets of EM Holdings and its subsidiaries. The EME financing consists of a $700 million, 364-day interest only revolving credit facility, structured on a recourse, unsecured basis. The proceeds of EM Holdings' $800 million loan and EME's $700 million loan, combined with cash and corporate revolver borrowings totaling approximately $300 million were used to finance the acquisition of Homer City. In May 1999, EM Holdings completed an $830 million bond financing. The financing consists of (1) $300 million, 8.137% Senior Secured Bonds due 2019 and (2) $530 million, 8.734% Senior Secured Bonds due 2026. These bonds are non- recourse to 7
10-Q10th Page of 28TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 10th
EME. The proceeds of the $830 million bonds were used primarily to repay EM Holdings' $800 million, 364-day interest only term loan. In May 1999, Edison Mission Energy Global Management, Inc. issued $120 million of Flexible Money Market Cumulative Preferred Stock. The stock issuance consists of (1) 600 Series A Shares and (2) 600 Series B Shares, both with liquidation preference of $100,000 per share and a dividend rate of 5.74% until May 2004. In May 1999 EME Taupo issued a $214 million (400 million New Zealand dollars) credit facility. The proceeds from the $120 million stock and $214 million credit facility, combined with an equity contribution from Edison International of $300 million and cash were used to finance the acquisition of Contact. In June 1999, EME Taupo issued $84 million (160 million New Zealand dollars) of Retail Redeemable Preference Shares, the proceeds of which were used to repay a portion of the EME Taupo $214 million credit facility. In June 1999, EME issued $600 million, 7.73% Senior Notes due 2009. The Notes are senior unsecured obligations of EME, which will be used for general corporate purposes. NOTE 5. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES Firm Commitments for Asset Purchases [Download Table] Projects U.S. ($ in millions) -------- -------------------- Commonwealth Edison Co. (i) $ 5,000 (i) A wholly owned subsidiary of EME executed an Asset Sale Agreement to purchase the fossil-fuel generating assets of Commonwealth Edison Co., totaling 9,621 MW located in the midwestern United States. The closing of the transaction is subject to receipt of various state and federal regulatory approvals and is expected to be completed by year end 1999. Firm Commitments to Contribute Project Equity [Download Table] Projects Local Currency U.S. ($ in millions) -------- -------------- -------------------- ISAB (i) 244 billion Italian Lira $130 EcoElectrica (ii) 34 Tri Energy (iii) 25 Paiton (iv) 17 (i) ISAB is a 512-MW integrated gasification combined cycle power plant under construction near Siracusa in Sicily, Italy. A wholly owned subsidiary of EME owns a 49% interest. Equity will be contributed at commercial operation, which is currently scheduled for late 1999. 8
10-Q11th Page of 28TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 11th
(ii) EcoElectrica is a 540-MW liquefied natural gas combined-cycle cogeneration facility under construction in Penuelas, Puerto Rico. A wholly owned subsidiary of EME owns a 50% interest. Equity will be contributed at commercial operation, which is currently scheduled for late 1999. (iii) Tri Energy is a 700-MW gas-fired power plant under construction in the Ratchaburi Province, Thailand. A wholly owned subsidiary of EME owns a 25% interest. Equity will be contributed at commercial operation, which is currently scheduled for mid-2000. (iv) Paiton is a 1,230-MW coal-fired power plant in operation in East Java, Indonesia. A wholly owned subsidiary of EME owns a 40% interest. Equity contributions continue to be made. Firm commitments to contribute project equity could be accelerated due to certain events of default as defined in the non-recourse project financing facilities. Management has no reason to believe that these events of default will occur to require acceleration of the firm commitments. Contingent Obligations to Contribute Project Equity [Download Table] Projects U.S. ($ in millions) -------- -------------------- Paiton (i) $141 Tri Energy (ii) 20 Doga (ii) 14 All Other 19 (i) Contingent obligations to contribute additional project equity (Contingent Equity) would be based on events principally related to capital cost overruns during the plant construction, certain partner obligations or events of default. These contingent obligations are to be cancelled (if unused) as of the date of term financing by the Export-Import Bank of the United States. Term financing by the Export-Import Bank of the United States is the subject of a comprehensive set of conditions. Based on present projections, the Project does not expect to complete these conditions at the time contemplated in the loan documentation (October 15, 1999), and is seeking an extension of the time to achieve term completion. The Project is also negotiating an understanding with its Lenders with regard to the amounts and uses of the Contingent Equity during the time of this extension. As of the date hereof, the Project does not have any commitment from the Lenders as to the extension. In addition, a dispute involving a slope adjacent to the Paiton site will require Contingent Equity to be contributed for amounts not otherwise covered by insurance. The Contractor has initiated a Phase II arbitration on the amount of compensation due as a result of the slope failure, and Paiton Energy is in discussions with its insurance companies on payment under its policies. EME's share of the total costs related to the slope failure are currently estimated to be between $16 and $44 million. Further, because of some delays in the completion of the construction, the Project expects certain other cost 9
10-Q12th Page of 28TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 12th
overruns. The EME share of these overruns is estimated to be between $10- 15 million. (ii) Contingent obligations to contribute additional equity to the project would be based on events principally related to capital cost overruns during plant construction, certain EME or partner obligations or events of default. Other than as noted above, management is not aware, at this time, of any other contingent obligations or obligations to contribute project equity. Other Commitments and Contingencies Certain of EME's subsidiaries entered into indemnification agreements whereby the subsidiaries agreed to repay capacity payments to the projects' power purchasers, in the event the projects unilaterally terminate their performance or reduce their electric power producing capability during the term of the power contract. Obligations under these indemnification agreements as of June 30, 1999, if payment were required, would be $243 million. Management has no reason to believe that the projects will either terminate their performance or reduce their electric power producing capability during the term of the power contracts. Paiton is a 1,230-MW coal-fired power plant in operation in East Java, Indonesia. A wholly owned subsidiary of EME owns a 40% interest and has a $370 million investment at June 30, 1999. The tariff is higher in the early years and steps down over time. The tariff for the Paiton project includes infrastructure to be used in common by other units at the Paiton complex. The plant's output is fully contracted with the state-owned electricity company, PT Perusahaan Listrik Negara (PLN). Payments are in Indonesian Rupiah, with the portion of such payments intended to cover non-Rupiah project costs (including returns to investors) indexed to the Indonesian Rupiah/U.S. dollar exchange rate established at the time of the Power Purchase Agreement (PPA) in February 1994. PLN's payment obligations are supported by the Government of Indonesia. The projected rate of growth of the Indonesian economy and the exchange rate of Indonesian Rupiah into U.S. dollars have deteriorated significantly since the Paiton project was contracted, approved and financed. The project received substantial finance and insurance support from the Export-Import Bank of the United States, The Export-Import Bank of Japan, the U.S. Overseas Private Investment Corporation and the Ministry of International Trade and Industry of Japan. The Paiton project's senior debt ratings have been reduced from investment grade to speculative grade based on the rating agencies' perceived increased risk that PLN might not be able to honor the electricity sales contract with Paiton. The Government of Indonesia has arranged to reschedule sovereign debt owed to foreign governments and has entered into discussions about rescheduling sovereign debt owed to private lenders. PLN has announced its intentions to commence discussions with independent power producers to renegotiate the power supply contracts, which discussions have commenced on an initial basis, however it is not yet known what form the renegotiation may take. Any material modifications of the contract could also require a renegotiation of the Paiton project's debt agreement. Certain events (including 10
10-Q13th Page of 28TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 13th
the shortfall in payment discussed in the paragraph below) which, with the passage of time or upon notice, may mature into defaults of the Project's debt agreement have occurred and may require the grant of waivers or renegotiation of the relevant agreements. Waivers of potential defaults have been received previously from the Project's creditors. The impact of any such renegotiations with PLN, the Government of Indonesia or the project's creditors on EME's expected return on its investment in Paiton is uncertain at this time, however, management believes that it will ultimately recover its investment in the project. Paiton notified PLN that Unit 7 of Paiton achieved Commercial Operation under terms of the PPA on May 1999 and that Unit 8 of Paiton achieved Commercial Operation under the terms of the PPA on July 1999. Because of the economic downturn, PLN is experiencing low electricity demand and PLN has therefore dispatched the Paiton plant to zero; however, under the terms of the PPA, PLN is required to continue to pay for capacity and fixed operating costs once each unit and the Plant achieve Commercial Operation. An invoice for these charges for May in the amount of $7.8 million was submitted to PLN. The project and PLN met to review the invoice and a partial payment of $2.5 million was subsequently received. The primary reason for the payment shortage was the use of an arbitrary Indonesian Rupiah/U.S. dollar exchange rate of 2,450 Indonesian Rupiah to one U.S. dollar by PLN. The use of this exchange rate is not in agreement with the Power Purchase Agreement, but is the exchange rate on which PLN payments to other independent power producers in Indonesia have been based. Brooklyn Navy Yard is a 286-MW gas-fired cogeneration power plant in Brooklyn, New York. A wholly owned subsidiary of EME owns 50% of the project. In February 1997, the construction contractor asserted general monetary claims under the turnkey agreement against Brooklyn Navy Yard Cogeneration Partners, L.P. (BNY) for damages in the amount of $136.8 million. BNY has asserted general monetary claims against the contractor. In connection with a $407 million non-recourse project refinancing in 1997, EME agreed to indemnify BNY and its partner from all claims and costs arising from or in connection with the contractor litigation, which indemnity has been assigned to the lenders. EME believes that the outcome of this litigation will not have a material adverse effect on its financial position or results of operations. Litigation EME is routinely involved in litigation arising in the normal course of business. While the results of such litigation cannot be predicted with certainty, management, based on advice of counsel, does not believe that the final outcome of any pending litigation will have a material adverse effect on EME's financial position or results of operations. 11
10-Q14th Page of 28TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 14th
Environmental Matters EME is subject to environmental regulation by federal, state and local authorities in the U.S. and foreign regulatory authorities with jurisdiction over projects located outside the U.S. EME believes that it is in substantial compliance with environmental regulatory requirements and that maintaining compliance with current requirements will not materially affect its financial position or results of operations. EME completed a partial review of its sites in 1995 and does not believe that a material liability exists as of June 30, 1999. The implementation of Clean Air Act Amendments is expected to result in increased operating expenses; however, these expenses are not expected to have a material impact on EME's financial position or results of operations. NOTE 6. BUSINESS SEGMENTS EME operates predominately in one line of business, electric power generation, with reportable segments organized by geographic region: Americas, Asia Pacific and Europe, Central Asia, Middle East and Africa. EME's plants are located in different geographic areas, which mitigates the effects of regional markets, economic downturns or unusual weather conditions. These regions take advantage of the increasing globalization of the independent power market. Intercompany transactions have been eliminated in the following segment information. [Download Table] Europe, (In millions) Central Asia, Three Months Ended Asia Middle East Corporate/ June 30, 1999 Americas Pacific and Africa Other(/i/) Total ------------- -------- ------- ------------- ---------- -------- Operating revenues $ 122.6 $ 56.1 $ 90.7 $ -- $ 269.4 Net income (loss) 21.0 (4.4) 1.7 (12.8) 5.5 Total assets 3,504.6 2,486.8 2,166.8 -- 8,158.2 June 30, 1998 ------------- Operating revenues $ 58.9 $ 53.2 $ 95.2 $ -- $ 207.3 Net income (loss) 22.1 (3.4) 6.0 (6.1) 18.6 Total assets 913.8 1,686.6 2,428.9 -- 5,029.3 12
10-Q15th Page of 28TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 15th
[Download Table] Europe, (In millions) Central Asia, Six Months Ended Asia Middle East Corporate/ June 30, 1999 Americas Pacific and Africa Other(/i/) Total ------------- -------- ------- ------------- ---------- -------- Operating revenues $ 207.2 $ 106.3 $ 225.6 $ -- $ 539.1 Net income (loss) 51.0 (14.4) 28.9 (15.9) 49.6 Total assets 3,504.6 2,486.8 2,166.8 -- 8,158.2 June 30, 1998 ------------- Operating revenues $ 88.3 $ 107.3 $ 243.6 $ -- $ 439.2 Net income (loss) 32.3 (3.6) 39.0 (11.4) 56.3 Total assets 913.8 1,686.6 2,428.9 -- 5,029.3 (i) Includes corporate net interest expense NOTE 7. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS In July 1999, Edison First Power Limited, a wholly owned subsidiary of EME, a wholly owned, non-utility subsidiary of Edison International, completed a transaction with PowerGen UK plc, to acquire the Ferrybridge and Fiddler's Ferry coal-fired electric generating plants located in the United Kingdom. Ferrybridge, located in West Yorkshire, and Fiddler's Ferry, located in Warrington, each have a generating capacity of approximately 2,000 megawatts. Consideration for Ferrybridge and Fiddler's Ferry consisted of a cash payment of approximately $2.0 billion (1.3 billion pounds Sterling) for the two plants. The acquisition was funded primarily with a combination of net proceeds from the Edison First Power Limited Guaranteed Secured Variable Rate Bonds issued on July 19, 1999 and due 2019, and equity from Edison International. 13
10-Q16th Page of 28TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 16th
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q includes certain forward-looking statements, the realization of which may be affected by certain important factors discussed in "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" thereunder and elsewhere herein. GENERAL ------- Edison Mission Energy (EME) is a leading global power producer. Through its subsidiaries, EME is engaged in the business of developing, acquiring, owning and operating electric power generation facilities worldwide. EME's current investments include 65 projects totaling 19,397 megawatts (MW) of generation capacity, of which 16,922 are in operation and 2,475 are under construction. In addition, 12 operating projects totaling 9,621 MW of generating capacity are pending acquisition. EME's operating revenues are derived primarily from electric revenues and equity in income from energy projects. Operating revenues also include equity in income from oil and gas investments and revenue attributable to operation and maintenance services. Electric revenues are derived from consolidated results of operations of one domestic and several international entities. Equity in income from energy projects relates to EME's ownership interest of 50% or less voting stock in projects. The equity method of accounting is generally used to account for the operating results of entities over which EME has a significant influence but in which it does not have a controlling interest. With respect to entities accounted for under the equity method, EME recognizes its proportional share of the income or loss of such entities. ACQUISITIONS ------------ In March 1999, EME Homer City Generation L.P. (EME Homer City), an indirect, wholly owned affiliate of EME, completed a transaction with GPU, Inc., New York State Electric & Gas Corporation and their respective affiliates to acquire the 1,884-MW Homer City Electric Generating Station and certain facilities and other assets associated therewith (collectively, Homer City). Consideration for Homer City consisted of a cash payment of approximately $1.8 billion, which was partially financed by $1.5 billion of new loans, combined with corporate revolver borrowings and cash. In May 1999, Edison Mission Energy Taupo Ltd. (EME Taupo), an indirect, wholly owned affiliate of EME, completed a transaction with the New Zealand government to acquire 40% of the shares of Contact Energy Ltd. (Contact). Contact owns and operates hydroelectric, geothermal and natural gas-fired power generating plants in New Zealand with a total generating capacity of 2,371 MW. Contact also supplies gas and electricity 14
10-Q17th Page of 28TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 17th
to customers in New Zealand and has minority interests in two power projects in Australia. Consideration for Contact consisted of a cash payment of approximately $648 million (1.2 billion New Zealand dollars), which was financed by $120 million of preferred stock issued by Edison Mission Energy Global Management, Inc., a $214 million (400 million New Zealand dollars) credit facility issued by EME Taupo, a $300 million equity contribution from Edison International and cash. In July 1999, Edison First Power Limited, a wholly owned subsidiary of EME, a wholly owned, non-utility subsidiary of Edison International, completed a transaction with PowerGen UK plc, to acquire the Ferrybridge and Fiddler's Ferry coal-fired electric generating plants located in the United Kingdom. Ferrybridge, located in West Yorkshire, and Fiddler's Ferry, located in Warrington, each have a generating capacity of approximately 2,000 megawatts. Consideration for Ferrybridge and Fiddler's Ferry consisted of a cash payment of approximately $2.0 billion (1.3 billion pounds Sterling) for the two plants. The acquisition was funded primarily with a combination of net proceeds from the Edison First Power Limited Guaranteed Secured Variable Rate Bonds issued on July 19, 1999 and due 2019, and equity from Edison International. These acquisitions were accounted for utilizing the purchase method. EME's consolidated statement of income for the three and six months ended June 30, 1999 reflects the operations of Homer City beginning on March 18, 1999 and Contact beginning May 1, 1999. The consolidated statements of income, balance sheets and cash flows do not reflect the Ferrybridge and Fiddler's Ferry generating plants acquired in July 1999. RESULTS OF OPERATIONS --------------------- OPERATING REVENUES Operating revenues increased $62.1 million and $99.9 million for the second quarter and six months ended June 30, 1999, respectively, compared with the corresponding periods of 1998, resulting primarily from increases in electric revenues and equity in income from energy projects. Electric revenues increased $74.3 million and $72.3 million for the second quarter and six months ended June 30, 1999, respectively, compared with the corresponding periods of 1998, primarily due to revenues from Homer City acquired in March 1999. Equity in income from energy projects decreased $13 million and increased $30.2 million during the second quarter and six months ended June 30, 1999, respectively, compared with the corresponding periods of 1998. The second quarter decrease was principally due to a geothermal project that was sold in 1998 which recorded earnings in 1998 that had been deferred in previous years. The increase for the six month period was primarily the result of higher revenues from several cogeneration projects due to a final settlement on energy pricing for prior years. 15
10-Q18th Page of 28TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 18th
OPERATING EXPENSES Operating expenses increased $60.1 million and $83.1 million for the second quarter and six months ended June 30, 1999, respectively, compared with the same prior year periods. These increases are due to higher fuel, plant operations, depreciation and amortization and administrative and general expenses. The increases in fuel expense, plant operations and depreciation and amortization are primarily the result of expenses at Homer City acquired in March 1999. The administrative and general expense increase is primarily related to increased project development/acquisition costs. OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE) Interest expense increased $33.7 million and $32.5 million for the second quarter and six months ended June 30, 1999, respectively, compared with the same prior year periods. The increase was primarily the result of additional debt financing of the Homer City acquisition. CUMULATIVE EFFECT OF CHANGE IN ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLE In April 1998, the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants issued Statement of Position (SOP) 98- 5, "Reporting on the Costs of Start-Up Activities", which became effective in January 1999. The Statement requires that certain costs related to start-up activities be expensed as incurred and that certain previously capitalized costs be expensed and reported as a cumulative change in accounting principle. The impact of adopting SOP 98-5 on EME's net income was $13.8 million, after-tax. PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES EME recorded an effective tax provision rate of 18% for the six months ended June 30, 1999, compared with a 41% rate for the same prior year period. The decrease in the 1999 effective tax rate was primarily due to lower foreign income taxes that result from the permanent reinvestment of earnings from foreign affiliates located in different foreign tax jurisdictions. LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES For the six months ended June 30, 1999, net cash provided by operating activities decreased to $98.3 million from $123.6 million for the same period in 1998. The 1999 decrease primarily reflects lower distributions from oil and gas projects and increased working capital requirements associated with the acquisition of Homer City. Net cash provided by financing activities totaled $2,861.6 million during the first six months of 1999, compared to $12.1 million in 1998 for the same prior year period. The 1999 increase is primarily due to the Edison Mission Holding Co., parent company of EME Homer City, $830 million senior secured bonds, EME financing of $700 million, EME Senior Notes of $600 million, Edison Mission Energy Taupo Limited (EME Taupo) $214 million credit facility, Edison Mission Energy Global Management, Inc. $120 million Flexible Money Market Cumulative Preferred Stock, EME Taupo $84 million Retail Redeemable Preference Shares and borrowing on the corporate revolver of $335 million, the proceeds of which were used to purchase Homer City and Contact. 16
10-Q19th Page of 28TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 19th
Net cash used in investing activities increased to $2,601.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 1999 from $53.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 1998. The increase is primarily due to the purchase of Homer City and Contact. At June 30, 1999, EME had cash and cash equivalents of $808.3 million and had available $107 million of borrowing capacity under a $500 million revolving credit facility that expires in 2001 and $125 million of borrowing capacity under a $700 million commercial paper facility that expires in 2000. This borrowing capacity under the revolving credit facility may be reduced by borrowings for firm commitments to contribute project equity and to fund capital expenditures and construction costs of its project facilities. In July 1999, Edison First Power Limited, completed a transaction with PowerGen UK plc, to acquire the Ferrybridge and Fiddler's Ferry coal-fired electric generating plants located in the United Kingdom. Consideration for Ferrybridge and Fiddler's Ferry consisted of a cash payment of approximately $2.0 billion (1.3 billion pounds Sterling) for the two plants. The acquisition was funded primarily with a combination of net proceeds from the Edison First Power Limited Guaranteed Secured Variable Rate Bonds issued on July 19, 1999 and due 2019, and equity from Edison International. Firm Commitments for Asset Purchases [Download Table] Projects U.S. ($ in millions) -------- -------------------- Commonwealth Edison Co. (i) $ 5,000 (i) A wholly owned subsidiary of EME executed an Asset Sale Agreement to purchase the fossil-fuel generating assets of Commonwealth Edison Co., totaling 9,621 MW located in the midwestern United States. The closing of the transaction is subject to receipt of various state and federal regulatory approvals and is expected to be completed by year end 1999. Firm Commitments to Contribute Project Equity [Download Table] Projects Local Currency U.S. ($ in millions) -------- -------------- -------------------- ISAB (i) 244 billion Italian Lira $130 EcoElectrica (ii) 34 Tri Energy (iii) 25 Paiton (iv) 17 (i) ISAB is a 512-MW integrated gasification combined cycle power plant under construction near Siracusa in Sicily, Italy. A wholly owned subsidiary of EME owns a 49% interest. Equity will be contributed at commercial operation, which is currently scheduled for late 1999. (ii) EcoElectrica is a 540-MW liquefied natural gas combined-cycle cogeneration facility under construction in Penuelas, Puerto Rico. A wholly owned subsidiary of 17
10-Q20th Page of 28TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 20th
EME owns a 50% interest. Equity will be contributed at commercial operation, which is currently scheduled for late 1999. (iii) Tri Energy is a 700-MW gas-fired power plant under construction in the Ratchaburi Province, Thailand. A wholly owned subsidiary of EME owns a 25% interest. Equity will be contributed at commercial operation, which is currently scheduled for mid-2000. (iv) Paiton is a 1,230-MW coal-fired power plant in operation in East Java, Indonesia. A wholly owned subsidiary of EME owns a 40% interest. Equity contributions continue to be made. Firm commitments to contribute project equity could be accelerated due to certain events of default as defined in the non-recourse project financing facilities. Management has no reason to believe that these events of default will occur to require acceleration of the firm commitments. Contingent Obligations to Contribute Project Equity [Download Table] Projects U.S. ($ in millions) -------- -------------------- Paiton (i) $141 Tri Energy (ii) 20 Doga (ii) 14 All Other 19 (i) Contingent obligations to contribute additional project equity (Contingent Equity) would be based on events principally related to capital cost overruns during the plant construction, certain partner obligations or events of default. These contingent obligations are to be cancelled (if unused) as of the date of term financing by the Export-Import Bank of the United States. Term financing by the Export-Import Bank of the United States is the subject of a comprehensive set of conditions. Based on present projections, the Project does not expect to complete these conditions at the time contemplated in the loan documentation (October 15, 1999), and is seeking an extension of the time to achieve term completion. The Project is also negotiating an understanding with its Lenders with regard to the amounts and uses of the Contingent Equity during the time of this extension. As of the date hereof, the Project does not have any commitment from the Lenders as to the extension. In addition, a dispute involving a slope adjacent to the Paiton site will require Contingent Equity to be contributed for amounts not otherwise covered by insurance. The Contractor has initiated a Phase II arbitration on the amount of compensation due as a result of the slope failure, and Paiton Energy is in discussions with its insurance companies on payment under its policies. EME's share of the total costs related to the slope failure are currently estimated to be between $16 and $44 million. Further, because of some delays in the completion of the construction, the Project expects certain other cost overruns. The EME share of these overruns is estimated to be between $10-15 million. 18
10-Q21st Page of 28TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 21st
(ii) Contingent obligations to contribute additional equity to the project would be based on events principally related to capital cost overruns during plant construction, certain EME or partner obligations or events of default. Other than as noted above, management is not aware, at this time, of any other contingent obligations or obligations to contribute project equity. Other Commitments and Contingencies Certain of EME's subsidiaries entered into indemnification agreements whereby the subsidiaries agreed to repay capacity payments to the projects' power purchasers, in the event the projects unilaterally terminate their performance or reduce their electric power producing capability during the term of the power contract. Obligations under these indemnification agreements as of June 30, 1999, if payment were required, would be $243 million. Management has no reason to believe that the projects will either terminate their performance or reduce their electric power producing capability during the term of the power contracts. Paiton is a 1,230-MW coal-fired power plant in operation in East Java, Indonesia. A wholly owned subsidiary of EME owns a 40% interest and has a $370 million investment at June 30, 1999. The tariff is higher in the early years and steps down over time. The tariff for the Paiton project includes infrastructure to be used in common by other units at the Paiton complex. The plant's output is fully contracted with the state-owned electricity company, PT Perusahaan Listrik Negara (PLN). Payments are in Indonesian Rupiah, with the portion of such payments intended to cover non-Rupiah project costs (including returns to investors) indexed to the Indonesian Rupiah/U.S. dollar exchange rate established at the time of the Power Purchase Agreement (PPA) in February 1994. PLN's payment obligations are supported by the Government of Indonesia. The projected rate of growth of the Indonesian economy and the exchange rate of Indonesian Rupiah into U.S. dollars have deteriorated significantly since the Paiton project was contracted, approved and financed. The project received substantial finance and insurance support from the Export-Import Bank of the United States, The Export-Import Bank of Japan, the U.S. Overseas Private Investment Corporation and the Ministry of International Trade and Industry of Japan. The Paiton project's senior debt ratings have been reduced from investment grade to speculative grade based on the rating agencies' perceived increased risk that PLN might not be able to honor the electricity sales contract with Paiton. The Government of Indonesia has arranged to reschedule sovereign debt owed to foreign governments and has entered into discussions about rescheduling sovereign debt owed to private lenders. PLN has announced its intentions to commence discussions with independent power producers to renegotiate the power supply contracts, which discussions have commenced on an initial basis, however it is not yet known what form the renegotiation may take. Any material modifications of the contract could also require a renegotiation of the Paiton project's debt agreement. Certain events (including the shortfall in payment discussed in the paragraph below) which, with the passage of time or upon notice, may mature into defaults of the Project's debt agreement have 19
10-Q22nd Page of 28TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 22nd
occurred and may require the grant of waivers or renegotiation of the relevant agreements. Waivers of potential defaults have been received previously from the Project's creditors. The impact of any such renegotiations with PLN, the Government of Indonesia or the project's creditors on EME's expected return on its investment in Paiton is uncertain at this time, however, management believes that it will ultimately recover its investment in the project. Paiton notified PLN that Unit 7 of Paiton achieved Commercial Operation under terms of the PPA on May 1999 and that Unit 8 of Paiton achieved Commercial Operation under the terms of the PPA on July 1999. Because of the economic downturn, PLN is experiencing low electricity demand and PLN has therefore dispatched the Paiton plant to zero; however, under the terms of the PPA, PLN is required to continue to pay for capacity and fixed operating costs once each unit and the Plant achieve Commercial Operation. An invoice for these charges for May in the amount of $7.8 million was submitted to PLN. The project and PLN met to review the invoice and a partial payment of $2.5 million was subsequently received. The primary reason for the payment shortage was the use of an arbitrary Indonesian Rupiah/U.S. dollar exchange rate of 2,450 Indonesian Rupiah to one U.S. dollar by PLN. The use of this exchange rate is not in agreement with the Power Purchase Agreement, but is the exchange rate on which PLN payments to other independent power producers in Indonesia have been based. Brooklyn Navy Yard is a 286-MW gas-fired cogeneration power plant in Brooklyn, New York. A wholly owned subsidiary of EME owns 50% of the project. In February 1997, the construction contractor asserted general monetary claims under the turnkey agreement against Brooklyn Navy Yard Cogeneration Partners, L.P. (BNY) for damages in the amount of $136.8 million. BNY has asserted general monetary claims against the contractor. In connection with a $407 million non-recourse project refinancing in 1997, EME agreed to indemnify BNY and its partner from all claims and costs arising from or in connection with the contractor litigation, which indemnity has been assigned to the lenders. EME believes that the outcome of this litigation will not have a material adverse effect on its financial position or results of operations. EME and its subsidiaries may incur additional obligations to make equity and other contributions to projects in the future. EME believes that it will have sufficient liquidity on both a short- and long-term basis to fund pre-financing project development costs, make equity contributions to partnerships, pay corporate debt obligations and pay other administrative and general expenses as they are incurred from (1) distributions from energy projects and dividends from investments in oil and gas, (2) proceeds from the repayment of loans to energy projects and (3) funds available from EME's revolving credit facility. CHANGES IN INTEREST RATES, CHANGES IN ELECTRICITY POOL PRICING, FOREIGN CURRENCY FLUCTUATIONS AND OTHER CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS Changes in interest rates, changes in electricity pool pricing and fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates can have a significant impact on EME's 20
10-Q23rd Page of 28TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 23rd
results of operations. Interest rate changes affect the cost of capital needed to construct and finance projects. EME has mitigated a portion of the risk of interest rate fluctuations by arranging for fixed rate financing or variable rate financing with interest rate swaps or other hedging mechanisms for the majority of its project financing. Interest expense included $12.5 million and $11.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 1999, and 1998, respectively, as a result of interest rate swap and collar agreements. EME has entered into several interest rate swap and collar agreements whereby the maturity date of the swaps and collars occurs prior to the final maturity of the underlying debt. EME does not believe that interest rate fluctuations will have a material adverse effect on its financial position or results of operations. Projects in the U.K. sell their electric energy and capacity through a centralized electricity pool, which establishes a half-hourly clearing price (also referred to as the "pool price") for electric energy. The pool price is extremely volatile and can vary by as much as a factor of ten or more over the course of a few hours, due to the large differentials in demand according to the time of day. First Hydro mitigates a portion of the market risk of the pool by entering into contracts for differences (electricity rate swap agreements), related to either the selling or purchasing price of power, whereby a contract specifies a price at which the electricity will be traded, and the parties to the agreement make payments, calculated based on the difference between the price in the contract and the pool price for the element of power under contract. These contracts are sold in various structures. These contracts act as a means of stabilizing production revenues or purchasing costs by removing an element of First Hydro's net exposure to pool price volatility. On July 29, 1998, the Director General of Electricity Supply proposed to the Minister for Science, Energy and Industry that the current structure of contracts-for- differences and compulsory trading via the pool at half-hourly clearing prices bid a day ahead be abolished. He proposed in its place, among other things, the establishment of voluntary forwards and futures markets, organized by independent market operators and evolving in response to demand; a short-term bilateral market operating from 24 to 4-hours before a trading period; a balancing market to enable the system operator to balance generation and demand and resolve any transmission constraints; a settlement process for recovering imbalances between contracted and metered volumes with stronger incentives for being in balance; and a Balancing and Settlement Code Panel to oversee governance of the short-term bilateral and balancing markets. The Minister for Science, Energy and Industry has recommended that the proposal be implemented by April 2000. Further definition of the proposal will be required before the effects of the changes can be evaluated. Implementation of the proposal may also require legislation. Loy Yang B sells its electric energy through a centralized electricity pool (the National Electricity Market) which provides for a system of generator bidding, central dispatch and a settlements system based on a clearing market for each half-hour of every day. The Victorian Power Exchange, operator and administrator of the pool, determines a system marginal price each half-hour. To mitigate exposure to price volatility of the electricity traded into the pool, Loy Yang B has entered into a number of financial hedges. From May 8, 1997 to December 31, 2000, approximately 53% to 64% of the plant output sold is hedged under "Vesting Contracts" with the remainder of the plant 21
10-Q24th Page of 28TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 24th
capacity hedged under the "State Hedge" described below. Vesting Contracts were put into place by the State Government of Victoria, Australia (State), between each generator and each distributor, prior to the privatization of electric power distributors in order to provide more predictable pricing for those electricity customers that were unable to choose their electricity retailer. Vesting Contracts set base strike prices at which the electricity will be traded, and the parties to the agreement make payments, calculated based on the difference between the price in the contract and the half-hourly pool clearing price for the element of power under contract. These contracts are sold in various structures. These contracts are accounted for as electricity rate swap agreements. The State Hedge is a long-term contractual arrangement based upon a fixed price commencing May 8, 1997, and terminating October 31, 2016. The State guarantees SECV's obligations under the State Hedge. Electric power generated at Homer City is sold under bilateral arrangements with domestic utilities and power marketers under short-term contracts (two years or less) or to the Pennsylvania-New Jersey-Maryland Power Interconnection (PJM) or the New York Power Pool (NYPP). The PJM pool has a market which establishes an hourly clearing price. Homer City is situated in the PJM Control Area and is physically connected to high-voltage transmission lines serving both the PJM and NYPP markets. Power can also be transmitted to the midwestern United States. EME has developed risk management policies and procedures which, among other matters, address credit risk. It is EME's policy to sell to investment grade counterparties or counterparties that have an investment grade guarantor. EME intends on hedging a portion of the electric output of the plant in order to lock in desirable outcomes. It plans to manage the "spark spread" or margin, that is the spread between electric prices and fuel prices when deemed appropriate. It plans to use forward contracts, swaps, futures, or options contracts to achieve those objectives. EME's electric revenues were increased by $20.1 million and $70.1 million for the six-month periods ended June 30, 1999, and 1998, respectively, as a result of electricity rate swap agreements and other hedging activities. The electric power generated by EME's domestic operating projects, excluding Homer City, is generally sold to electric utilities pursuant to long- term (typically, 15 to 30-year) power sales contracts and is expected to result in consistent cash flow under a wide range of economic and operating circumstances. To accomplish this, EME structured its power sales contracts so that fluctuations in fuel costs would produce similar fluctuations in electric and/or steam revenues and entered into long-term fuel supply and transportation agreements. Fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates can affect, on a U.S. dollar equivalent basis, the amount of EME's equity contributions to, and distributions from, its foreign projects. As EME continues to expand into foreign markets, fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates can be expected to have a greater impact on EME's results of operations in the future. At times, EME has hedged a portion of its current exposure to fluctuations in foreign exchange rates where it deems appropriate through financial 22
10-Q25th Page of 28TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 25th
derivatives, offsetting obligations denominated in foreign currencies and indexing underlying project agreements to U.S. dollars or other indices reasonably expected to correlate with foreign exchange movements. In addition, EME has used statistical forecasting techniques to help assess foreign exchange risk and the probabilities of various outcomes. There can be no assurance, however, that fluctuations in exchange rates will be fully offset by hedges or that currency movements and the relationship between certain macro economic variables will behave in a manner consistent with historical or forecasted relationships. ENVIRONMENTAL MATTERS EME is subject to environmental regulation by federal, state and local authorities in the U.S. and foreign regulatory authorities with jurisdiction over projects located outside the U.S. EME believes that it is in substantial compliance with environmental regulatory requirements and that maintaining compliance with current requirements will not materially affect its financial position or results of operations. EME completed a partial review of its sites in 1995 and does not believe that a material liability exists as of June 30, 1999. The implementation of Clean Air Act Amendments is expected to result in increased operating expenses; however, these expenses are not expected to have a material impact on EME's financial position or results of operations. YEAR 2000 ISSUE EME has a comprehensive program in place to remediate potential Year 2000 impacts from critical systems. EME divided its Year 2000 Issue activities into five phases: inventory, impact assessment, remediation, documentation and certification. A critical system was defined as those applications and systems, including embedded processor technology, which if not appropriately remediated might have had a significant impact on customers, the revenue stream, regulatory compliance, or the health and safety of personnel. With respect to critical systems, EME has achieved Year 2000 readiness as of July 1999. Assurances from third party operated plants have been received indicating aggressive Year 2000 remediation programs. Monitoring of these efforts is ongoing. Plants under construction have obtained assurances from new construction and development contractors, who have been requested to ensure this is part of their goals. General warranty of plants would likely include any equipment issues that may arise regarding Year 2000 in the current year. The other essential component of the EME Year 2000 readiness program was to identify and assess vendor products and business partners for Year 2000 readiness. EME put a process in place to identify and contact vendors and business partners to determine their Year 2000 status, and has evaluated the responses. EME's general policy requires that all newly purchased products be Year 2000 ready or otherwise designed to allow EME to determine whether such products present Year 2000 issues. 23
10-Q26th Page of 28TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 26th
Plant contingency plans have been developed and reviewed for any significant issues and to schedule appropriate testing and/or training. Such contingency plans include developing strategies for dealing with Year 2000- related processing failures or malfunctions due to EME's internal systems or from external parties. EME's contingency plans evaluate reasonably likely worst case scenarios or conditions. EME does not expect the Year 2000 issue to have a material adverse effect on its results of operations or financial position. However, if not effectively remediated, negative effects from Year 2000 issues, including those related to external systems, vendors, business partners, the independent system operator, the power exchange or customers, could cause results to differ. STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING STANDARDS NO. 133 In June 1998, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 133, "Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities", which, as amended, will be effective in January 2001. The Statement establishes accounting and reporting standards requiring that every derivative instrument be recorded in the balance sheet as either an asset or liability measured at its fair value. The Statement requires that changes in the derivative's fair value be recognized currently in earnings unless specific hedge accounting criteria are met. A derivative's gains and losses for qualifying hedges offset related results on the hedged item in the income statement and a company must formally document, designate and assess the effectiveness of transactions that receive hedge accounting. The impact of adopting Statement 133 on EME's financial statements has not been quantified at this time. ACQUISITIONS PENDING In March 1999, EME entered into agreements to acquire the fossil-fuel generating assets of Commonwealth Edison Co. (ComEd), totaling 9,621 MW. EME will operate the plants, which are located in the midwestern United States. The closing of the transaction is subject to various state and federal regulatory approvals and is expected to be completed by year end 1999. EME plans to finance the approximately $5 billion acquisition with a combination of debt secured by the project, corporate debt, cash and funding from Edison International. The acquisition is expected to have an immaterial effect on earnings in 1999, 2000 and 2001 as a result of transition contracts whereby ComEd will retain power purchase agreements with EME, enabling ComEd access to certain amounts of plant output for the next five years to serve its customers. 24
10-Q27th Page of 28TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 27th
PART II - OTHER INFORMATION ITEM 6. EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K (a) Exhibits Exhibit No. Description ----------- ----------- 10.63 Indenture and the First Supplemental Indenture dated as of June 28, 1999, between EME and The Bank of New York, as Trustee, 7.73% Senior Notes Due June 15, 2009. 27 Financial Data Schedule (b) Reports on Form 8-K The registrant filed the following reports on Form 8-K during the quarter ended June 30, 1999. [Download Table] Date of Report Date Filed Item Reported -------------- ---------- ------------- March 18, 1999 April 2, 1999 2 July 19, 1999 August 2, 1999 2 25
10-QLast Page of 28TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 28th
SIGNATURES Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized. Edison Mission Energy --------------------- (Registrant) Date: August 12, 1999 /s/ THOMAS E. LEGRO --------------------- ------------------- THOMAS E. LEGRO Vice President and Controller 26

Dates Referenced Herein   and   Documents Incorporated by Reference

Referenced-On Page
This ‘10-Q’ Filing    Date First  Last      Other Filings
10/31/1624
6/15/0927
12/31/002310-K
10/15/991120
Filed on:8/13/991
8/12/9928
7/19/9915278-K/A
For Period End:6/30/99127
6/28/9927
5/1/99917
3/31/99810-K,  10-Q
3/18/999278-K
12/31/98810-K
7/29/9823
6/30/9842410-Q
12/31/97810-K
5/8/972324
 List all Filings 
Top
Filing Submission 0001017062-99-001438   –   Alternative Formats (Word / Rich Text, HTML, Plain Text, et al.)

Copyright © 2024 Fran Finnegan & Company LLC – All Rights Reserved.
AboutPrivacyRedactionsHelp — Fri., May 17, 10:36:31.2am ET