SEC Info  
    Home      Search      My Interests      Help      Sign In      Please Sign In

Envirotest Systems Corp/DE – ‘10-Q’ for 12/31/96

As of:  Friday, 2/14/97   ·   For:  12/31/96   ·   Accession #:  912057-97-5609   ·   File #:  0-21454

Previous ‘10-Q’:  ‘10-Q’ on 8/14/96 for 6/30/96   ·   Next:  ‘10-Q’ on 5/15/97 for 3/31/97   ·   Latest:  ‘10-Q’ on 8/13/98 for 6/30/98

Find Words in Filings emoji
 
  in    Show  and   Hints

  As Of                Filer                Filing    For·On·As Docs:Size              Issuer               Agent

 2/14/97  Envirotest Systems Corp/DE        10-Q       12/31/96    3:32K                                    Merrill Corp/FA

Quarterly Report   —   Form 10-Q
Filing Table of Contents

Document/Exhibit                   Description                      Pages   Size 

 1: 10-Q        Quarterly Report                                      16     57K 
 2: EX-11       Statement re: Computation of Earnings Per Share        1      6K 
 3: EX-27       EX-27 Financial Data Schedule                          2      8K 


10-Q   —   Quarterly Report
Document Table of Contents

Page (sequential) | (alphabetic) Top
 
11st Page   -   Filing Submission
2Item 1. Financial Statements:
12Item 1. Legal Proceedings
14Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K
10-Q1st Page of 16TOCTopPreviousNextBottomJust 1st
 

UNITED STATES Securities and Exchange Commission Washington, D.C. 20549-1004 ---------------------------- Form 10-Q (Mark One) [x] QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the quarterly period ended December 31, 1996 or [ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from to ----------- ------------ ENVIROTEST SYSTEMS CORP. ------------------------ (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) Delaware 0-21454 06-0914220 -------- ------- ---------- (State or other jurisdiction (Commission (IRS Employer of incorporation) File Number) Identification Number) ENVIROTEST TECHNOLOGIES, INC. ----------------------------- (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) Delaware 33-57384-01, 33-75406-01 36-2680300 -------- ------------------------- ---------- (State or other jurisdiction (Commission (IRS Employer of incorporation) File Number) Identification Number) 246 Sobrante Way Sunnyvale, California 94086 --------------------------- (Address of principal executive offices, including zip code, of registrants) (408) 774-6300 -------------- (Registrants' telephone number, including area code) Indicate by check mark whether the registrants (1) have filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrants were required to file such reports), and (2) have been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes X No --- --- Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date. Class of Common Stock Outstanding at January 31, 1997 --------------------- ------------------------------- Class A Common Stock, $0.01 par value 13,204,396 shares Class B Common Stock, $0.01 par value 1,389,749 shares Class C Common Stock, $0.01 par value 2,026,111 shares 1
10-Q2nd Page of 16TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 2nd
ENVIROTEST SYSTEMS CORP. INDEX ----- Page No. -------- PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION ------------------------------ Item 1. Financial Statements: Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets: December 31, 1996 and September 30, 1996 3 Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations: three months ended December 31, 1996 and 1995 5 Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows: three months ended December 31, 1996 and 1995 6 Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements 7 Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations 9 PART II. OTHER INFORMATION --------------------------- Item 1. Legal Proceedings 12 Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K 14 SIGNATURES ---------- Exhibit Index 2
10-Q3rd Page of 16TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 3rd
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION Item 1. Financial Statements ENVIROTEST SYSTEMS CORP. Condensed Consolidated Balance sheets (Amounts in thousands) [Download Table] December 31, September 30, 1996 1996 ------------ ------------- (unaudited) ASSETS Current assets: Cash and cash equivalents $143,417 $ 53,104 Short-term investments - 7,991 Settlement due from Commonwealth of Pennsylvania 80,000 (current portion) Contract receivables, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $468 and $449, respectively 9,088 10,969 Prepaid and other current assets 6,159 6,432 -------- -------- Total current assets 158,664 158,496 Restricted cash 19,111 21,108 Property, plant and equipment, net 192,342 192,400 Assets held under capital lease, net 45,108 46,108 Assets held for sale, net 30,276 32,246 Intangible assets, net 14,245 14,927 Deferred debt acquisition costs, net 13,894 13,159 Deferred charges, net 1,137 1,189 Other assets 1,675 1,151 -------- -------- Total assets $476,452 $480,784 3
10-Q4th Page of 16TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 4th
ENVIROTEST SYSTEMS CORP. Condensed Consolidated Balance sheets (Continued) (Amounts in thousands) [Download Table] LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY Current liabilities: Accounts payable $ 2,525 $ 3,825 Accrued interest 9,467 1,689 Current portion of long-term debt 4,032 4,740 Current portion of capital lease and long-term debt obligation 4,800 3,880 Other current liabilities 25,222 27,754 -------- -------- Total current liabilities 46,046 41,888 Senior long-term debt, net 199,238 199,192 Senior subordinated debt 125,000 125,000 Capital lease and long-term debt obligation, net of current portion 56,965 58,155 Other long-term debt, net of current portion 36,997 38,129 Other long-term liabilities 5,377 5,266 -------- -------- Total liabilities 469,623 467,630 Stockholders' equity: Common stock 166 166 Additional paid-in capital 60,172 60,172 Cumulative currency adjustment (247) (96) Retained deficit (47,684) (41,510) Other stockholders' equity (5,578) (5,578) -------- -------- Total stockholders' equity 6,829 13,154 -------- -------- Total liabilities and stockholders' equity $476,452 $480,784 -------- -------- -------- -------- The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed consolidated financial statements. 4
10-Q5th Page of 16TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 5th
ENVIROTEST SYSTEMS CORP. CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (Amounts in thousands, except per share data) Three Months Ended December 31, 1996 1995 -------- -------- (Unaudited) Contract revenues $31,179 $28,184 Costs of services 24,604 21,892 -------- -------- Gross profit 6,575 6,292 Selling, general and administrative expenses 4,294 4,177 Amortization expense 672 1,011 Gain on Pennsylvania settlement - (15,307) -------- -------- Income from operations 1,609 16,411 Other expense (income): Interest expense 9,548 8,326 Other (80) 20 Interest income (1,685) (1,095) -------- -------- Income (loss) before income taxes (6,174) 9,160 Income tax expense - 3,572 -------- -------- Net income (loss) $(6,174) $ 5,588 -------- -------- -------- -------- Earnings (loss) per common and common equivalent share $ (0.37) $ 0.32 -------- -------- -------- -------- Weighted average common shares and common equivalent shares 16,620 17,265 -------- -------- -------- -------- Earnings (loss) per common share - assuming full dilution $ (0.37) $ 0.32 -------- -------- -------- -------- Weighted average common shares and common equivalent shares 16,620 17,265 -------- -------- -------- -------- The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed consolidated financial statements. 5
10-Q6th Page of 16TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 6th
ENVIROTEST SYSTEMS CORP. CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Amounts in thousands) Three Months Ended December 31, 1996 1995 ------- ------- (Unaudited) Cash flows from operating activities $ 6,853 $ 31,807 -------- -------- Cash flows from investing activities: Maturity of short-term investments 7,991 1,347 Purchases of property, plant, and equipment (3,638) (27,596) -------- -------- Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities 4,353 (26,249) Cash flows from financing activities: Proceeds from sale of Pennsylvania receivable 79,405 - Proceeds from borrowings of long-term debt - 17,000 Decrease in restricted cash 1,997 14,837 Repayment of long-term debt (980) - Repayment of obligations under capital lease (1,130) - Capitalization of loan fees (190) (573) Other - 121 -------- -------- Net cash provided by financing activities 79,102 31,385 Effect of exchange rate on cash 5 13 -------- -------- Net increase in cash and cash equivalents 90,313 36,956 Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period 53,104 17,079 -------- -------- Cash and cash equivalents, end of period $143,417 $54,035 The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed consolidated financial statements. 6
10-Q7th Page of 16TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 7th
ENVIROTEST SYSTEMS CORP. NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 1. Basis of Presentation The condensed consolidated financial statements included herein have been prepared by the Company, without audit, pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Company's audited consolidated financial statements and related footnotes included in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 1996 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Operating results for the interim periods shown in this report are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for any other interim period or the full fiscal year. 2. Deferred Charges The Company incurs significant expenses associated with bringing new emissions testing programs into operation, including staff recruiting and training, public information and similar pre-operating costs. These expenses are deferred and amortized over a twelve month period beginning with the commencement of the emissions program. At December 31, 1996, the Company had incurred and deferred approximately $1.1 million, net of accumulated amortization, of such expenses relating to the Indiana and Connecticut emissions programs. The Company expects that its results of operations during any fiscal period that includes the commencement of a program will be adversely impacted by this accelerated. amortization. 3. Pennsylvania Settlement On December 11, 1996, the Company sold its right to receive the two remaining installment payments totaling $80 million (the "Receivable Assets") in principal amount due under a settlement agreement with the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania (the "Settlement Agreement") for approximately $79,405,000. The transaction was effected through a sale of the Receivables Assets from Envirotest Partners, a Pennsylvania general partnership owned by Envirotest and ETI, to a newly formed wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, ES Funding Corp. ("Funding"). Funding, in turn, transferred the Receivables Assets to an affiliate of a Pennsylvania bank. Funding and Partners provided certain representations in connection with the transaction, including representations as to enforceability of the Settlement Agreement against the Commonwealth, and agreed to repurchase the Receivables Assets if Partners fails to comply with its obligations under the Settlement 7
10-Q8th Page of 16TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 8th
Agreement. The Settlement Agreement also requires the Company to use its best efforts to dispose of the assets it acquired to perform vehicle emissions testing services in Pennsylvania. If the net proceeds received by the Company from the sale of the assets is less than $55 million, Pennsylvania is obligated to pay the Company fifty percent of the difference up to $11 million no later than July 31, 1998. The amount of this contingent payment was reduced from $15 million in an amendment to the Settlement Agreement that permitted the Company to complete sale of the receivable assets. Should the net proceeds from the sale of the real estate and other program related assets exceed $55 million, the Company is obligated to pay the Commonwealth 75% of the amount by which the net proceeds exceed $55 million. Based upon the experience with recent sales of these assets, and the sufficiency of reserves, the Company has increased its estimates of the residual value of the remaining real estate by 4 million and the Company is of the opinion that upon final disposition of properties no loss will be recognized. 4. Income Taxes The deferred tax asset has been fully reserved as of December 31, 1996. The amount of the deferred tax asset considered realizable, however, could change in the near term if estimates of future taxable income are revised. 5. Legal Proceedings The State of Connecticut has made certain claims stating that the Company owes the State $2.4 million plus accruing amounts for certain cost savings in the start up of the enhanced testing program in Connecticut. The Company cannot predict the outcome of this complaint. However, the Company believes that it has valid defense against these claims. As previously disclosed, the Company is a defendant in Grendell, et al. V. Ohio EPA. et al, a taxpayers' class action suit originally filed on October 3, 1996 in Geauga County Court of Common Pleas, State of Ohio. The case has been remanded to the Common Pleas Court in Franklin County, Ohio. Plaintiffs are political opponents to Ohio's motor vehicle emission inspection program, known as "E Check," and seek to enjoin the program and Envirotest's Ohio contracts as invalid and void based on three Ohio constitutional provisions. No case management schedule has been issued by the Court. The Company believes that it has valid defenses to the claims contained in the complaint and intends to defend the matter vigorously. On January 30, 1997, Ron Young, as relator, filed an original action for a writ of quo warranto and ancillary relief in the Ohio Supreme Court. The action names Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, as the respondent. The complaint requests that the Court require respondent to establish by what authority the Ohio General Assembly enacted Am. Sub. S.B. 18, the State's most recent version of a motor vehicle inspection and maintenance ("I/M") program. Apart from the question of standing, Envirotest believes that there are significant legal issues as to whether his action is encompassed within the scope and purpose of this extraordinary writ. Envirotest filed a motion to intervene as an additional party respondent on February 4, 1997. The Attorney General has twenty-one days from the date of service to respond. Envirotest believes it appears to be a necessary and indispensable party to the litigation, and that its motion should be sustained. See Part II., Item 1 - Legal Proceedings for further discussion. The Company is a party to various other legal proceedings and claims in the ordinary course of business. The Company does not believe that the outcome of any pending matters will have a material adverse affect on its consolidated financial position or results of operations. 8
10-Q9th Page of 16TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 9th
ENVIROTEST SYSTEMS CORP. Item 2. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS General The Company conducts its current operations directly and through its principal wholly owned subsidiaries, Envirotest Technologies, Inc. ("ETI"), Envirotest Wisconsin, Inc. and Systems Control, Inc., a Washington corporation. The Company's British Columbia, Canada operations are conducted through a British Columbia partnership, Ebco-Hamilton Partners ("EHP"), which is wholly owned by the Company (through its subsidiaries). Results of Operations Contract revenues increased to $31.2 million in fiscal first quarter 1997 from $28.2 million in fiscal first quarter 1996, an increase of $3.0 million or 10.6%. This increase is primarily attributable to a $2.8 million increase in revenue generated from the implementation of a new contract with the State of Ohio, additional revenue of $2.0 million from the Washington State program acquired on January 30, 1996, and a $1.0 million increase in the British Columbia program resulting from a one time adjustment in the scheduling requirements for testing. The increase in revenue was partially offset by a decrease in revenue of $1.6 million in the Colorado program as more vehicles were scheduled for testing in the corresponding first fiscal quarter 1996. The Connecticut program also experienced a decrease of $l.2 million as compared to the comparable quarter. The test volume in the comparable quarter included tests that had been extended by the State of Connecticut during the commencement of the new program in fiscal 1995. In addition, revenue also decreased $0.5 million as a result of the expiration of the California Quality Assurance contract which ceased September 30, 1996. Gross profit increased to $6.6 million in fiscal first quarter 1997 from $6.3 million in fiscal first quarter 1996, an increase of $0.3 million, or 4.8%. As a percentage of contract revenues, gross profit decreased to 21.1% in fiscal first quarter 1997 from 22.3% in fiscal first quarter 1996, an absolute decrease of 1.2%. This decrease was mainly attributable to the lower revenues in the Connecticut program, and the lower gross margin in the new Ohio program due to higher start-up costs then anticipated. This decrease was partially offset by the contribution from the newly acquired Washington program and the improvement in margins in the Colorado and British Columbia programs. Selling, general and administrative ("SG&A") expenses were $4.3 million in fiscal first quarter 1997 as compared to $4.2 million in fiscal first quarter 1996. As a percentage of contract revenues, SG&A expenses decreased to 13.8% in fiscal first quarter 1997 from 14.8% in fiscal first quarter 1996, an absolute decrease of 1.0%. Amortization expense decreased to $0.7 million in fiscal first quarter 1997 from $ 1.0 million in fiscal first quarter 1996, a decrease of $0.3 million. The decrease is attributable to expiration of the California Quality Assurance contract as of September 30, 1996. First fiscal quarter 1996 included a one time gain on the Pennsylvania settlement of $15.3 million. 9
10-Q10th Page of 16TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 10th
Income from operations decreased to $1.6 million in fiscal first quarter 1997 from $16.4 million in fiscal first quarter 1996, a decrease of $14.8 million. Income from operations as a percentage of contract revenues decreased to 5.2% in fiscal first quarter 1997 from 58.2% in fiscal first quarter 1996 an absolute decrease of 53.0%. This decrease was primarily attributable to the gain of $15.3 million reflected on the Pennsylvania settlement in fiscal first quarter of 1996. Interest expense increased to $9.5 million in fiscal first quarter 1997 from $8.3 million in fiscal first quarter 1996, an increase of $1.2 million. The increase in interest expense was primarily attributable to debt associated with the start-up of new programs in Wisconsin, Washington, and Indiana. Interest income increased to $1.7 million in fiscal first quarter 1997 from $1.1 million in fiscal first quarter of 1996, an increase of $0.6 million. The increase in interest income was primarily attributable to interest earned on the amounts due under the Pennsylvania settlement. There was no income tax benefit on the pretax loss in fiscal first quarter 1997 compared to an income tax expense of $3.6 million in fiscal first quarter 1996. The benefit was lower than the combined federal and state effective tax rate of approximately 39% as a result of recording a valuation allowance to fully reserve the deferred tax asset. Net loss was $6.2 million in fiscal first quarter 1997 compared to a net income of $5.6 million in fiscal first quarter 1996, a decrease of $11.8 million. Liquidity, Capital Resources and Commitments Cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments and restricted cash increased to $162.5 million at December 31, 1996 from $82.2 million at September 30, 1996. The increase of $80.3 million was primarily a result of the proceeds of $79.4 million received as a result of the Company selling its right to receive the two remaining installment payments totaling $80 million from the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. The Company's primary uses of cash are the funding of the Company's capital expenditure requirements, payments on capital and operating leases, interest payments and other working capital needs. The Company's capital and operating leases currently require minimum lease payments of approximately $15.7 million in fiscal year 1997, decreasing to approximately $14.3 million through 1999 and decreasing thereafter as certain leases are scheduled to expire. The Company's capital expenditures include maintenance capital expenditures for existing facilities, and development and construction expenditures for new emissions facilities. The Company's development and construction capital expenditures are dependent on the number of contracts it is awarded, and are only incurred after the contract has been signed. After signing a contract, the Company may incur significant development and construction expenditures, which the Company expects to finance with existing cash resources, internally generated funds, additional borrowings and alternative financing sources, including leasing alternatives. It generally takes one to two years after a contract has been signed for a program to begin operations and generate revenues, depending on the size of the program. The Company's principal commitments at December 31, 1996 consist of capital expenditure requirements for the completion of implementation of the Indiana program estimated at 10
10-Q11th Page of 16TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 11th
$2.4 million. Also in fiscal 1997, the Company intends to spend approximately $1.2 million on maintenance capital expenditures. The Company believes that its existing cash resources, cash generated from operations and alternative financing sources, including leasing alternatives, will be sufficient to complete implementation of the Indiana program and to meet its liquidity requirements for the foreseeable future. Recent Accounting Pronouncements Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 - Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation will be effective for the Company's 1997 fiscal year. This statement introduces a fair-value based method of accounting for stock-based compensation. It encourages, but does not require, companies to recognize compensation expense for grants of stock, stock options and other equity instruments to employees based on the new fair-value accounting rules. Companies that choose not to adopt the new fair-value accounting rules will be required to disclose pro forma net income and earnings per share under the new method. Management has not yet determined which method it will adopt. Certain sections of this Form 10-Q, including "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations," contain forward looking statements within the meaning of Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, with respect to the Company's expectations or belief concerning future events. The Company cautions that these statements are further qualified by important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those in the forward looking statements. The forward looking statements include, without limitation, the amounts of reserves recognized and ultimate outcome of pending litigation. 11
10-Q12th Page of 16TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 12th
ENVIROTEST SYSTEMS CORP. PART II. OTHER INFORMATION Item 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS As previously disclosed, the Company's new contract with the state of Connecticut began January 1, 1995, with enhanced testing scheduled to begin on April 3, 1995. Just prior to the startup of enhanced testing, the State decided to continue the old testing procedure and phase in the enhanced testing. Additionally, the Company was unable to build two facilities, one due to the State's inability to provide the land the contract required and the other due to the inability to obtain zoning. The State claimed that it was entitled to be paid for the cost savings to the Company for not having performed the enhanced test and not having built the facilities. The Company claimed additional costs incurred when the State unilaterally changed the test. After unsuccessful settlement negotiations, the Commissioner of Department of Motor Vehicles rendered a decision on February 9, 1996 that the Company owed the State $2.4 million plus other non-qualified amounts for 1995 and additional accruing amounts until the enhanced test was performed and the facilities built. In accordance with the contract and to protect its rights, the Company appealed the Commissioner's decision to binding arbitration at the American Arbitration association. On May 1, 1996, prior to the appointment of the arbitrators, the State filed a complaint in the Superior Court at Hartford to enjoin the arbitration from going forward claiming that the American Arbitration Association had no power to administer hearings in this manner. The State has taken no further action on this matter and no hearing date with regard to the State's complaint has been scheduled. As previously disclosed, the Company is a defendant in Grendell, et al. V. Ohio EPA. et al, a taxpayers' class action suit originally filed on October 3, 1996 in Geauga County Court of Common Pleas, State of Ohio. The case has been remanded to the Common Pleas Court in Franklin County, Ohio. Plaintiffs are political opponents to Ohio's motor vehicle emission inspection program, known as "E Check," and seek to enjoin the program and Envirotest's Ohio contracts as invalid and void based on three Ohio constitutional provisions. No case management schedule has been issued by the Court. The Company believes that it has valid defenses to the claims contained in the complaint and intends to defend the matter vigorously. On January 30, 1997, Ron Young, as relator, filed an original action for a writ of quo warranto and ancillary relief in the Ohio Supreme Court. The action names Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, as the respondent. The complaint requests that the Court require respondent to establish by what authority the Ohio General Assembly enacted Am. Sub. S.B. 18, the State's most recent version of a motor vehicle inspection and maintenance ("I/M") program. A relator needs authority to request a writ of quo warranto. Typically, only the State Attorney General has the right to bring such an action. Mr. Young, a member of the Ohio House of Representatives, asserts that the Attorney General is disqualified from bringing an action for a writ. In addition to asserting his standing to request a writ of quo warranto, Representative Young's complaint seeks to invalidate Envirotest's contracts awarded pursuant to Ohio's I/M statutes on state and federal constitutional grounds. Apart from the question of standing, Envirotest believes that there are significant legal issues as to whether his action is encompassed within the scope and purpose of this extraordinary writ. Envirotest filed a motion to intervene as an additional party respondent on February 4, 1997. The Attorney General has twenty-one days from the date of service to respond. Envirotest believes 12
10-Q13th Page of 16TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 13th
it appears to be a necessary and indispensable party to the litigation, and that its motion should be sustained. The Company is a party to various other legal proceedings and claims in the ordinary course of business. The Company does not believe that the outcome of any pending matters will have a material adverse affect on its consolidated financial position or results of operations. 13
10-Q14th Page of 16TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 14th
Item 6. EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K (a) Exhibits (11) Statement of Computation of Earnings Per Share (27) Financial Data Schedule a. Reports on Form 8-K The Registrants filed the following reports on Form 8-K during the last quarter: 1. The Company filed a Report on Form 8-K on December 12, 1996 that included information under Item 5 ("Other Events"). The Report was filed for the purpose of disclosing that the Company had sold its right to receive the two remaining installment payments totaling $80 million in principal amount due to the Company under its Settlement Agreement with the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania for approximately $79,405,000. The Report did not include any financial statements. 14
10-Q15th Page of 16TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 15th
SIGNATURES Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrants have duly caused their report to be signed on their behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized. ENVIROTEST SYSTEMS CORP. (Registrant) ENVIROTEST TECHNOLOGIES, INC. (Registrant) Date: February 14, 1997 /s/F. Robert Miller F. Robert Miller President and Chief Executive Officer Date: February 14, 1997 /s/Raj Modi Raj Modi Vice President, Chief Financial Officer Treasurer and Assistant Secretary (Principal Financial Officer) 15
10-QLast Page of 16TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 16th
ENVIROTEST SYSTEMS CORP. EXHIBIT INDEX Exhibit Number Page No. (11) Statement of Computation Earnings Per Share (27) Financial Data Schedule 16

Dates Referenced Herein   and   Documents Incorporated by Reference

Referenced-On Page
This ‘10-Q’ Filing    Date First  Last      Other Filings
7/31/988
Filed on:2/14/9715
2/4/97812
1/31/971
1/30/97812
For Period End:12/31/96110
12/12/96148-K
12/11/967
10/3/96812
9/30/9671010-K,  10-K405/A
5/1/9612
2/9/9612
1/30/969
12/31/952
4/3/9512
1/1/9512
 List all Filings 
Top
Filing Submission 0000912057-97-005609   –   Alternative Formats (Word / Rich Text, HTML, Plain Text, et al.)

Copyright © 2024 Fran Finnegan & Company LLC – All Rights Reserved.
AboutPrivacyRedactionsHelp — Fri., Apr. 26, 8:43:40.2pm ET