Document/ExhibitDescriptionPagesSize
1: CB Rights/Exchange/Tender Offer Notification/Response HTML 15K
2: EX-1 Underwriting Agreement HTML 3.79M
3: EX-2 Plan of Acquisition, Reorganization, Arrangement, HTML 20K
Liquidation or Succession
4: EX-3 Articles of Incorporation/Organization or By-Laws HTML 9K
THE ROYAL BANK OF CANADA (“RBC”) COMMON SHARES TO
BE ISSUED FOLLOWING THE COMPLETION OF THE AMALGAMATION HAVE NOT
BEEN APPROVED OR DISAPPROVED BY ANY CANADIAN SECURITIES
REGULATORY AUTHORITY, NOR HAS ANY CANADIAN SECURITIES REGULATORY
AUTHORITY PASSED ON THE ACCURACY OR ADEQUACY OF THE
DIRECTORS’ CIRCULAR (“CIRCULAR”). ANY
REPRESENTATION TO THE CONTRARY IS AN OFFENCE.
THE RBC COMMON SHARES TO BE ISSUED FOLLOWING THE COMPLETION
OF THE AMALGAMATION HAVE NOT BEEN APPROVED OR DISAPPROVED BY ANY
SECURITIES REGULATORY AUTHORITY IN BARBADOS, JAMAICA OR TRINIDAD
AND TOBAGO, NOR HAS ANY SECURITIES REGULATORY AUTHORITY IN
BARBADOS, JAMAICA OR TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO PASSED ON THE ACCURACY
OR ADEQUACY OF THE CIRCULAR. ANY REPRESENTATION TO THE CONTRARY
IS AN OFFENCE.
THE RBC COMMON SHARES TO BE ISSUED FOLLOWING THE COMPLETION
OF THE AMALGAMATION HAVE NOT BEEN APPROVED OR DISAPPROVED BY THE
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR SECURITIES
REGULATORY AUTHORITIES OF ANY STATE OF THE UNITED STATES, NOR
HAS THE UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR
SECURITIES REGULATORY AUTHORITIES OF ANY STATE OF THE UNITED
STATES PASSED ON THE ADEQUACY OR ACCURACY OF THE CIRCULAR. ANY
REPRESENTATION TO THE CONTRARY IS A CRIMINAL OFFENCE.
THE INFORMATION CONCERNING RBC AND ITS AFFILIATES CONTAINED
IN THE CIRCULAR IS BASED SOLELY UPON PUBLICLY AVAILABLE SOURCES
AND INFORMATION THAT HAS BEEN PROVIDED BY RBC. RBTT FINANCIAL
HOLDINGS LIMITED (“RBTT”) ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBILITY
FOR THE INFORMATION IN THE CIRCULAR RELATING TO RBC AND ITS
AFFILIATES. RBC HAS AGREED TO ENSURE THAT NONE OF THE
INFORMATION PROVIDED BY IT FOR INCLUSION IN THE CIRCULAR WILL
CONTAIN ANY UNTRUE STATEMENT OF A MATERIAL FACT, OR WILL OMIT TO
STATE A MATERIAL FACT REQUIRED TO BE STATED THEREIN, OR
NECESSARY IN ORDER TO MAKE THE STATEMENTS THEREIN NOT MISLEADING
IN LIGHT OF THE CIRCUMSTANCES UNDER WHICH THEY WERE MADE.
NO PERSON IS AUTHORIZED TO GIVE ANY INFORMATION OR TO MAKE
ANY REPRESENTATION NOT CONTAINED IN THE CIRCULAR, AND IF GIVEN
OR MADE, SUCH INFORMATION OR REPRESENTATION SHOULD NOT BE RELIED
UPON AS HAVING BEEN AUTHORIZED. THE CIRCULAR DOES NOT CONSTITUTE
AN OFFER TO SELL, OR A SOLICITATION OF AN OFFER TO PURCHASE, THE
SECURITIES TO BE ISSUED FOLLOWING THE COMPLETION OF THE
AMALGAMATION, OR THE SOLICITATION OF A PROXY, IN ANY
JURISDICTION, TO OR FROM ANY PERSON TO WHOM IT IS UNLAWFUL TO
MAKE SUCH OFFER, SOLICITATION OF AN OFFER OR PROXY SOLICITATION
IN SUCH JURISDICTION. NEITHER THE DELIVERY OF THE CIRCULAR NOR
ANY DISTRIBUTION OF THE SECURITIES TO BE ISSUED FOLLOWING THE
COMPLETION OF THE AMALGAMATION WILL, UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES,
CREATE ANY IMPLICATION OR BE TREATED AS A REPRESENTATION THAT
THERE HAS BEEN NO CHANGE IN THE INFORMATION SET FORTH HEREIN
SINCE THE DATE OF THE CIRCULAR.
RBTT SHAREHOLDERS SHOULD BE AWARE THAT THE PUBLIC DISCLOSURE
DOCUMENTS OF RBC CONTAINED IN THE CIRCULAR HAVE BEEN FILED IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THE SECURITIES LAWS OF CANADA, AND THAT THESE
REQUIREMENTS MAY DIFFER FROM THOSE OF BARBADOS, JAMAICA OR
TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO. AS WELL, FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDED IN
THE PUBLIC DISCLOSURE DOCUMENTS OF RBC HAVE BEEN PREPARED IN
ACCORDANCE WITH CANADIAN GENERALLY ACCEPTED ACCOUNTING
PRINCIPLES AND MAY NOT BE COMPARABLE TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF
RBTT. FURTHER, ALL DOLLAR FIGURES OR REFERENCES TO “$”
IN THE RBC AUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND
ACCOMPANYING MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS ATTACHED
AS APPENDIX “G” TO THE CIRCULAR ARE REFERENCES TO
CANADIAN CURRENCY.
THE CIRCULAR WAS NOT INTENDED OR WRITTEN TO BE USED, AND IT
CANNOT BE USED, FOR THE PURPOSE OF AVOIDING U.S. FEDERAL, STATE
OR LOCAL TAX PENALTIES.
STATEMENTS IN THE CIRCULAR, TO THE EXTENT NOT BASED ON
HISTORICAL EVENTS, CONSTITUTE FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS. WORDS
SUCH AS “WILL”, “EXPECTS”,
“ANTICIPATES”, “INTENDS”, “PLANS”,
“BELIEVES”, “SEEKS”, “ESTIMATES”,
AND VARIATIONS OF SUCH WORDS AND SIMILAR EXPRESSIONS ARE
INTENDED TO IDENTIFY THESE FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS.
SPECIFICALLY, AND WITHOUT LIMITING THE GENERALITY OF THE
FOREGOING, ALL STATEMENTS INCLUDED IN THE CIRCULAR THAT ADDRESS
ACTIVITIES, EVENTS OR DEVELOPMENTS THAT EITHER RBC OR RBTT
EXPECTS OR ANTICIPATES WILL OR MAY OCCUR IN THE FUTURE,
INCLUDING SUCH THINGS AS FUTURE CAPITAL (INCLUDING THE AMOUNT
AND NATURE THEREOF), DIVIDENDS, BUSINESS STRATEGIES AND MEASURES
TO IMPLEMENT SUCH STRATEGIES, COMPETITIVE STRENGTHS, GOALS,
EXPANSION AND GROWTH, OR REFERENCES TO THE FUTURE SUCCESS OF RBC
OR RBTT, THEIR RESPECTIVE SUBSIDIARIES AND THE COMPANIES, JOINT
VENTURES OR PARTNERSHIPS IN WHICH RBC OR RBTT HAS EQUITY
INVESTMENTS ARE FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS. ACTUAL RESULTS COULD
DIFFER MATERIALLY FROM THOSE REFLECTED IN THE FORWARD-LOOKING
STATEMENTS AS A RESULT OF (I) CERTAIN OF THE FACTORS
DESCRIBED IN THE CIRCULAR, (II) GENERAL ECONOMIC, MARKET OR
BUSINESS CONDITIONS, (III) THE OPPORTUNITIES (OR LACK
THEREOF) THAT MAY BE PRESENTED TO AND PURSUED BY RBC OR RBTT,
(IV) COMPETITIVE ACTIONS BY OTHER COMPANIES,
(V) CHANGES IN LAWS AND (VI) OTHER FACTORS, MANY OF
WHICH ARE BEYOND THE CONTROL OF RBC AND RBTT.
THE FOREGOING LIST OF IMPORTANT FACTORS IS NOT EXHAUSTIVE AND
OTHER FACTORS COULD ALSO ADVERSELY AFFECT THE COMPLETION OF THE
AMALGAMATION AND THE FUTURE RESULTS OF RBC AND RBTT. THE
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS SPEAK ONLY AS OF THE DATE OF THE
CIRCULAR. WHEN RELYING ON FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS TO MAKE
DECISIONS WITH RESPECT TO RBC OR RBTT, YOU SHOULD CAREFULLY
CONSIDER THE FOREGOING IMPORTANT FACTORS AND OTHER UNCERTAINTIES
AND POTENTIAL EVENTS.
FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ABOUT FACTORS THAT COULD CAUSE
ACTUAL RESULTS TO DIFFER MATERIALLY FROM THOSE DESCRIBED IN THE
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS, PLEASE SEE RBC’S
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS FOR THE YEAR ENDED
OCTOBER 31, 2007 ATTACHED AS APPENDIX “G” TO THE
CIRCULAR AND RBTT’S ANNUAL REPORT FOR THE YEAR ENDED MARCH31, 2007.
EXCEPT TO THE EXTENT REQUIRED BY APPLICABLE LAW OR
REGULATION, RBC AND RBTT UNDERTAKE NO OBLIGATION TO UPDATE ANY
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS, WHETHER WRITTEN OR ORAL, TO REFLECT
EVENTS OR CIRCUMSTANCES AFTER THE DATE OF THE CIRCULAR OR TO
REFLECT THE OCCURRENCE OF UNANTICIPATED EVENTS.
NOTICE TO
UNITED STATES RESIDENTS
FOLLOWING THE COMPLETION OF THE AMALGAMATION, THERE WILL BE
AN ISSUANCE OF COMMON SHARES OF RBC, WHICH IS A NON-U.S.
COMPANY. THE OFFER IS SUBJECT TO DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENTS OF A
FOREIGN COUNTRY THAT ARE DIFFERENT FROM THOSE OF THE UNITED
STATES. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDED IN THE CIRCULAR, IF ANY,
HAVE BEEN PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE WITH FOREIGN ACCOUNTING
STANDARDS THAT MAY NOT BE COMPARABLE TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
OF UNITED STATES COMPANIES.
IT MAY BE DIFFICULT FOR YOU TO ENFORCE YOUR RIGHTS AND ANY
CLAIM YOU MAY HAVE ARISING UNDER THE FEDERAL SECURITIES LAWS,
SINCE THE ISSUER IS LOCATED IN A FOREIGN COUNTRY, AND SOME OR
ALL OF ITS OFFICERS AND DIRECTORS MAY BE RESIDENTS OF A FOREIGN
COUNTRY. YOU MAY NOT BE ABLE TO SUE A FOREIGN COMPANY OR ITS
OFFICERS OR DIRECTORS IN A FOREIGN COURT FOR VIOLATIONS OF U.S.
SECURITIES LAWS. IT MAY BE DIFFICULT TO COMPEL A FOREIGN COMPANY
AND ITS AFFILIATES TO SUBJECT THEMSELVES TO A U.S. COURT’S
JUDGMENT.
YOU SHOULD BE AWARE THAT THE ISSUER MAY PURCHASE SECURITIES
OTHERWISE THAN UNDER THE AMALGAMATION, SUCH AS IN OPEN MARKET OR
PRIVATELY NEGOTIATED PURCHASES.
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a special meeting
(“Special Meeting”) of the holders of ordinary
shares (“RBTT Shareholders”) of RBTT Financial
Holdings Limited (“RBTT”) will be held in the
Ballroom of the Hilton Trinidad & Conference Centre, Lady
Young Road, St. Ann’s, Trinidad, on Wednesday,
March 26, 2008 at 9:30 a.m. for the RBTT Shareholders to
consider and, if thought fit, approve a special resolution
(“Amalgamation Resolution”), the text of which
is set out in Appendix “A” to the Directors’
Circular (“Circular”) of RBTT accompanying this
notice, authorizing and approving the amalgamation of a
newly-incorporated, indirect, wholly-owned Trinidad and Tobago
subsidiary of Royal Bank of Canada with RBTT to create an
amalgamated corporation, and certain related transactions,
substantially upon the terms and conditions set forth in the
Amalgamation Agreement (attached as Appendix “E” to
the Circular).
DATED at
Port-of-Spain,
Trinidad this 8th day of February, 2008.
By Order of the Board of
Directors
Nicole Richards
Corporate Secretary
NOTES:
1.
In accordance with Section 110(2) of the Companies Act,
Chap. 81:01, the Board of Directors
(“Directors”) of RBTT have fixed
February 18, 2008 as the record date for the determination
of shareholders who are entitled to receive notice of the
Special Meeting. Only shareholders on record at the close of
business on February 18, 2008 are therefore entitled to
receive notice of the Special Meeting. A list of such
shareholders will be available for examination by shareholders
at RBTT’s Registered Office, 19-21 Park Street,
Port-of-Spain,
Trinidad during usual business hours and at the Special Meeting.
2.
A shareholder entitled to attend and vote at the Special
Meeting, or any adjournment or postponement thereof, is entitled
to appoint one or more proxies to attend and vote instead of
him/her. A proxy need not be a shareholder. Attached are the
Circular and a proxy form (“Proxy Form”). The
Proxy Form must be completed and signed in accordance with the
Notes on the Proxy Form and then deposited with the Corporate
Secretary at the Registered Office of RBTT before 9:30 a.m.
on March 25, 2008 or, in the event that the Special Meeting
is adjourned or postponed, 48 hours (excluding Saturdays,
Sundays and holidays) before the adjourned or postponed Special
Meeting is reconvened.
3.
A shareholder that is a body corporate may, in lieu of
appointing a proxy, authorize an individual by resolution of its
directors or of its governing body to represent it at the
Special Meeting, or any adjournment or postponement thereof.
4.
Shareholders are reminded that the By-laws of RBTT provide that
the Directors may require any shareholder, proxy or other
person, to provide satisfactory evidence of his/her identity
before being admitted to the Special Meeting, or any adjournment
or postponement thereof.
5.
RBTT Shareholders have a right to dissent in respect of the
Amalgamation Resolution, as provided in Section 227 of the
Companies Act. A dissenting shareholder is entitled to be paid
the fair value of his shares.
Special Meeting of the holders of ordinary shares of the Company
(“Shareholders”) to be held on Wednesday,
March 26, 2008 at 9:30 a.m. in the Ballroom of the Hilton
Trinidad & Conference Centre, Lady Young Road, St.
Ann’s, Trinidad.
3.
Solicitation:
It is intended to vote the proxy hereby solicited (unless the
Shareholder directs otherwise) in favour of the resolution
specified in the proxy form sent to the Shareholders.
4.
Any Director’s statement submitted pursuant to
Section 76(2):
No statement has been received from any Director pursuant to
Section 76(2) of the Companies Act, Chap. 81:01.
5.
Any Auditor’s statement submitted pursuant to
Section 171(1):
No statement has been received from the Auditors of the Company
pursuant to Section 171(1) of the Companies Act, Chap.
81:01.
6.
Any Shareholder’s proposal submitted pursuant to
Sections 116(a) and 117(2):
No proposal has been received from any Shareholder pursuant to
Sections 116(a) and 117(2) of the Companies Act, Chap. 81:01.
Unless the context otherwise requires, when used in the
Circular, the following terms shall have the meanings set forth
below, words importing the singular number shall include the
plural and vice versa and words importing any gender shall
include all genders. Capitalized terms not defined below shall
have the meanings ascribed to such terms in the applicable
section of the Circular, including the attached Appendices.
“1933 Act” means the United States Securities
Act of 1933.
“Affiliate” means, with respect to a specified
Person, another Person who directly or indirectly through one or
more intermediaries, Controls or is Controlled by or is under
common Control with the Person specified.
“Aggregate Cash Consideration” means the
product of (a) the Cash Amount, and (b) the excess of
(i) the total number of outstanding RBTT Ordinary Shares at
the Effective Time, over (ii) the total number of
outstanding RBTT Ordinary Shares held by Dissenting Shareholders
at the Effective Time, if any.
“Amalgamating Corporations” means RBTT and RBC
Holdings (Trinidad & Tobago).
“Amalgamation” means the amalgamation of RBTT
and RBC Holdings (Trinidad & Tobago) in accordance
with the Amalgamation Agreement.
“Amalgamation Agreement” means the amalgamation
agreement to be entered into by RBTT, RBC and RBC Holdings
(Trinidad & Tobago), substantially in the form of the
agreement attached to the Circular as Appendix “E”.
“Ancillary Agreements” means all agreements,
certificates, letters and other instruments delivered or given
pursuant to the Combination Agreement, including the
Amalgamation Agreement and the Articles of Amalgamation.
“Articles of Amalgamation” means the articles
of amalgamation of the amalgamated company resulting from the
amalgamation of RBTT and RBC Holdings (Trinidad &
Tobago) in respect of the Amalgamation that are required by the
Companies Act to be sent to the Registrar.
“Authorization” means, with respect to any
Person or matter, any order, permit, approval, consent, waiver,
licence or similar authorization of any Governmental Entity
having jurisdiction over the Person or matter.
“Bank Act” means the Bank Act (Canada)
as now in effect and as may be amended from time to time.
“Bank Regulators” means any Governmental Entity
charged with the supervision or regulation of banks or bank
holding companies.
“BSC” means The Securities Commission
(Barbados).
“BSE” means the Barbados Stock Exchange.
“Business Day” means any day of the year, other
than a Saturday, Sunday or any day on which major banks are
closed for business in Toronto, Ontario, Bridgetown, Barbados or
Port-of-Spain,
Trinidad and Tobago.
“Canadian Bank Approvals” means approval by the
Superintendent under the Bank Act, including approval of
(1) the acquisition by RBC of a substantial investment in,
and control of, RBTT and each RBTT Subsidiary that carries on a
financial services activity, and (2) the issuance of the
RBC Common Shares.
“Canadian GAAP” means accounting principles
generally accepted in Canada, including those that are
recommended in the Handbook of the Canadian Institute of
Chartered Accountants, at the relevant time applied on a
consistent basis.
“Cash Amount” means TT$24.00 (or, where an RBTT
Shareholder duly so elects in accordance with the Combination
Agreement, the U.S. Dollar Equivalent of TT$24.00).
“CDN$” means Canadian dollars.
“Certificate of Amalgamation” means the
certificate issued by the Registrar giving effect to the
Amalgamation.
“Circular” means this Directors’ circular
and notice of RBTT Meeting dated the date hereof, including all
appendices, schedules and exhibits thereto, sent to RBTT
Securityholders in connection with the RBTT Meeting.
“Clearing Agency” means the Trinidad and Tobago
Central Depository, the Jamaica Central Depository and the
Barbados Central Depository.
“Closing” means the consummation of the
amalgamation of RBTT and RBC Holdings (Trinidad &
Tobago) and the Redemption in accordance with the Amalgamation
Agreement.
“Closing Date” means June 30, 2008 or such
earlier date or later date as RBC and RBTT may mutually agree in
writing prior to the Outside Date upon which the Closing shall
occur, in each case, subject to the conditions of closing set
forth in the Combination Agreement and subject to the right of
either RBTT, on the one hand, or RBC, on the other hand, to
postpone the Closing Date for up to an additional 90 days
thereafter (in
30-day
increments) if the Regulatory Approvals have not been obtained
and have not been denied by a non-appealable decision of a
Governmental Entity, by giving written notice to the other to
such effect no later than 5:00 p.m. (Eastern Standard time)
on the date that is 15 days prior to the original Closing
Date (and any subsequent Closing Date).
“Collar Exchange Ratio” means, subject to
adjustment, if any, provided under the terms of the Amalgamation
Agreement, the quotient determined by dividing (i) the
Unadjusted Share Amount by (ii) the RBC Closing Average
Share Price (such quotient to be rounded to the nearest
one-hundred thousandth (0.00001)), provided that: (a) if
the RBC Closing Average Share Price is equal to or less than 90%
of the Collar Price, the Collar Exchange Ratio means the
quotient determined by dividing (i) the Unadjusted Share
Amount by (ii) 90% of the Collar Price (such quotient to be
rounded to the nearest one-hundred thousandth (0.00001)); and
(b) if the RBC Closing Average Share Price is equal to or
greater than 110% of the Collar Price, the Collar Exchange Ratio
means the quotient determined by dividing (i) the
Unadjusted Share Amount by (ii) 110% of the Collar Price
(such quotient to be rounded to the nearest one-hundred
thousandth (0.00001)).
“Collar Price” means U.S.$54.422, being the
volume-weighted average trading price in U.S. dollars of the RBC
Common Shares on the NYSE as reported by Bloomberg LP for the
five (5) consecutive trading days ending on the last
Business Day preceding the date of the Combination Agreement,
rounded to the nearest one-tenth of one cent (U.S.$0.001).
“Combination Agreement” means the combination
agreement made October 1, 2007 between RBTT and RBC, as
amended and restated as of January 22, 2008, attached as
Appendix “D” to the Circular, as further amended,
modified or supplemented from time to time in accordance with
its terms.
“Companies Act” means the Companies Act (Chap.
81:01 of the Laws of the Republic of Trinidad and Tobago), as
amended, as now in effect and as may be amended from time to
time.
“Confidentiality Agreement” means the
confidentiality agreement between RBTT and RBC dated as of
July 13, 2007, as amended, restated or otherwise modified
from time to time in accordance with its terms.
“Contract” means any agreement, contract,
licence, undertaking, engagement or commitment of any nature,
written or oral.
“Control” means the possession, directly or
indirectly, of the power to direct or cause the direction of the
management or policies of a Person, whether through the ability
to exercise voting power, by contract or otherwise.
“Controlled” has a corresponding meaning.
“Corporation” means the corporation continuing
as a result of the Amalgamation.
“Corporation Tax Act” means the Corporation Tax
Act (Chap.75:02 of the Laws of the Republic of Trinidad and
Tobago), as amended, as now in effect and as may be amended from
time to time.
“Credit Suisse” means Credit Suisse Securities
(USA) LLC.
“Directors” means the members of the board of
directors of RBTT and “Director” means any one of them.
“Dissent Notice” means a notice of a Dissenting
Shareholder to be sent to RBTT at or before the RBTT Meeting in
accordance with section 227(6) of the Companies Act.
“Dissent Rights” means the right of the
registered holders of RBTT Ordinary Shares to dissent in respect
of the Amalgamation pursuant to the procedures set forth in the
Circular.
“Dissenting Shareholder” means a holder of RBTT
Ordinary Shares who dissents in respect of the Amalgamation in
strict compliance with the Dissent Rights.
“Dissenting Shares” means the RBTT Ordinary
Shares held by Dissenting Shareholders.
“Effective Date” means the date on which the
Amalgamation becomes effective (being the date that the
Registrar under the Companies Act issues a Certificate and
Articles of Amalgamation in respect of the Amalgamation).
“Effective Time” means the actual time on the
Effective Date that the Amalgamation becomes effective.
“Election Deadline” means the date (which shall
be no later than the forty-fifth (45th) day prior to the Closing
Date, unless otherwise agreed to by the Parties) set forth in
the Election Form by which a holder of RBTT Ordinary Shares must
deposit the Election Form with the Escrow Agent.
“Election Form” means the election form
provided to holders of RBTT Ordinary Shares in order that such
holders may make an election to receive the U.S. Dollar
Equivalent of the Cash Amount, calculated as of the second (2nd)
Business Day prior to the Closing Date.
“Escrow Agent” means RBTT Trust Limited.
“Executive Director” means a director of RBTT
who is an officer or full-time employee of RBTT or any of its
affiliates.
“Executive Officers” means each of:
(i) Suresh B. Sookoo, Group Chief Executive Officer
(Executive Director); (ii) Rodney S. Prasad,
Head — Jamaica, Netherlands Antilles and Aruba
(Executive Director); (iii) Nicole M. Richards, Group
Corporate Secretary & General Counsel;
(iv) Stephen A.C. Bayne, Managing Director — RBTT
Trust Limited; (v) Lyndon R.W. Guiseppi, Managing
Director — RBTT Merchant Bank Limited; (vi) David
K. Hackett, Head — Barbados, Suriname &
Eastern Caribbean; (vii) Catherine R. Kumar, Managing
Director — RBTT Bank Limited; (viii) Calvin A.
Bijou, Head — Group Marketing and Customer Experience;
(ix) Leroy Calliste, Group Financial Comptroller;
(x) Ronald A. Carter, Head — Group
Strategy & Corporate Development; (xi) William P.
Charles, Head — Group Corporate Communications;
(xii) Gary A. Fuller, Group Chief Internal Auditor;
(xiii) Amos A. Herai, Head — Group Human
Resources; (xiv) Krishendath Maharaj, Head —
Group Technology; (xv) James C. Mendes, Head —
Group Risk Management; and (xvi) Patricia M. Narayansingh,
Head — Group Planning & Analysis.
“Fairness Opinions” means the fairness opinion
of Credit Suisse dated October 1, 2007 and the fairness
opinion of Merrill Lynch dated October 1, 2007, each of
which is attached to the Circular as Appendix “B” and
Appendix “C”, respectively.
“FIA” means the Foreign Investment Act (Chap.
70:07 of the Laws of the Republic of Trinidad and Tobago).
“First Preferred Shares” means the first
preferred shares in the capital of RBC.
“FSC” means the Financial Services Commission
(Jamaica).
“Governmental Entity” means (i) any
international, multinational, national, federal, provincial,
state, municipal, local or other governmental or public
department, central bank, court, commission, board, bureau,
agency or instrumentality, domestic or foreign, (ii) any
subdivision or authority of any of the foregoing, (iii) any
quasi-governmental or self-regulatory or other private body
exercising any regulatory, expropriation or taxing authority
under or for the account of any of the above, or (iv) any
stock exchange.
“IFRS” means International Financial Reporting
Standards.
“Information Statement” means a written
statement of a Dissenting Shareholder to be sent to RBTT
containing the information specified in section 228(1) of the
Companies Act.
“JSE” means the Jamaica Stock Exchange.
“Laws” means any and all applicable
(i) laws, constitutions, treaties, statutes, codes,
ordinances, principles of common and civil law and equity,
orders, decrees, rules, policies, regulations, guidelines,
directives and municipal by-laws whether domestic, foreign or
international, and (ii) judicial, arbitral, administrative,
ministerial, departmental and regulatory judgments, orders,
writs, injunctions, decisions, rulings, determinations, and
awards of any Governmental Entity, in each case binding on or
affecting the Person referred to in the context in which the
word is used.
“Liability” means with respect to any Person,
any liability or obligation of such Person of any kind,
character or description, absolute or contingent, or accrued or
unaccrued.
“Matching Period” means a period of ten
(10) Business Days from the later of (A) the date RBC
receives a Superior Proposal Notice advising RBC that
RBTT’s Board of Directors has resolved to accept, approve,
recommend (or change, withdraw, modify or qualify its
recommendation in respect of the Amalgamation) or enter into a
Contract in respect of an RBTT Superior Proposal, and
(B) the date RBC receives a copy of the RBTT Superior
Proposal document.
“Merrill Lynch” means Merrill Lynch, Pierce,
Fenner and Smith Incorporated.
“Notice of Intention” means the notice of RBTT
to be sent to a Dissenting Shareholder, under section 227(7) of
the Companies Act, stating that the RBTT Amalgamation Resolution
has been adopted, and advising the Dissenting
Shareholder that if the Dissenting Shareholder intends to
proceed with its exercise of its Dissent Rights, it must send to
RBTT an Information Statement.
“NYSE” means the New York Stock Exchange.
“Ordinary Course” means, with respect to an
action taken by a Person, that such action is taken in the
ordinary course of the normal
day-to-day
business operations of the Person and, in any event, constitutes
prudent banking practice and prudent commercial practice.
“Parties” means RBC and RBTT and any other
Person who may become a party to the Combination Agreement.
“Per Share Consideration” means the amount per
RBTT Ordinary Share that is equal to the sum of (a) the
Cash Amount and (b) the Share Amount.
“Person” means a natural person, partnership,
limited partnership, limited liability partnership, corporation,
limited liability corporation, limited liability company,
unlimited liability company, joint stock company, trust,
unincorporated association, joint venture or other entity or
Governmental Entity, and pronouns have a similarly extended
meaning.
“Principal Shareholders” means each of Guardian
Holdings Limited and Richard Azar.
“Proxy Form” means the proxy form enclosed with
the Circular.
“RBC” means Royal Bank of Canada, a
Schedule I Chartered Bank established under the Bank Act.
“RBC Board of Directors” means the board of
directors of RBC.
“RBC By-laws” means the by-laws of RBC adopted
on January 8, 1981, as amended from time to time.
“RBC Closing Average Share Price” means the
volume-weighted average trading price in U.S. dollars of the RBC
Common Shares on the NYSE as reported by Bloomberg LP for the
five (5) consecutive trading days ending on the second
Business Day immediately preceding the Effective Date, rounded
to the nearest one-tenth of one cent (U.S.$0.001).
“RBC Common Shares” means the common shares in
the capital of RBC.
“RBC Material Adverse Effect” means any effect
that is, or would reasonably be expected to be, material and
adverse, individually or in the aggregate (i) to the
business, operations, condition (financial or otherwise) or
assets of RBC and the RBC Subsidiaries, taken as a whole; or
(ii) to the ability of RBC to consummate the transactions
contemplated by the Combination Agreement before the Outside
Date, provided that in the case of clause (i) “RBC
Material Adverse Effect” shall not include any change or
effect on the business of RBC and the RBC Subsidiaries
attributable to (a) changes in general economic conditions
affecting banks generally in the regions where RBC and the RBC
Subsidiaries conduct their business, except to the extent that
such changes are disproportionately adverse to RBC or the RBC
Subsidiaries, (b) any actions taken or omitted to be taken
by RBC and the RBC Subsidiaries pursuant to the express terms of
the Combination Agreement, (c) the announcement of the
execution and delivery of the Combination Agreement or the
transactions contemplated by the Combination Agreement, or
(d) commencement, occurrence or continuation of any war,
armed hostilities or acts of terrorism, except to the extent
that the effects thereof are disproportionately adverse to RBC
or the RBC Subsidiaries.
“RBC Material Contract” means any contract,
agreement, licence, franchise, lease, arrangement, commitment,
understanding or other right or obligation to which RBC or any
of the RBC Subsidiaries is a party or by which RBC or any of the
RBC Subsidiaries is bound or affected or to which any of their
respective properties or assets is subject, that is material to
the business, operations or financial condition of RBC and the
RBC Subsidiaries, taken as a whole.
“RBC Shareholders” means the holders of RBC
Common Shares.
“RBC Subscription Proceeds” means the cash
amount in U.S. dollars that is equal to the product of
(i) the number of Redeemable Preferred Shares issued or to
be issued pursuant to the Amalgamation, and (ii) the RBC
Closing Average Share Price.
“RBC Subsidiary” means any corporation,
partnership, joint venture or other legal entity of which RBC
(either alone or through or together with any other subsidiary)
owns, directly or indirectly, more than 50% of the stock or
other equity interests the holders of which are generally
entitled to vote for the election of the board of directors or
other governing
body of such corporation or other legal entity or has, directly
or indirectly, the right to appoint a majority of the board of
directors or other governing body of such corporation or other
legal entity.
“RBTT” means RBTT Financial Holdings Limited, a
corporation governed by the laws of Trinidad and Tobago.
“RBTT Acquisition Proposal” means any proposal,
offer or public announcement with respect to any direct or
indirect merger, amalgamation, arrangement, exchange or tender
offer, take over bid, sale of assets (including the shares or
assets of an RBTT Subsidiary) or similar transaction
representing more than 20% of the book value (on a consolidated
basis) of RBTT’s total assets, any issuance, sale, transfer
or acquisition of more than 20% of RBTT’s Ordinary Shares
then outstanding or any similar transaction involving RBTT or
any RBTT Subsidiary, whether in one or a series of steps or
transactions, excluding the Amalgamation.
“RBTT Affiliate Transaction” means a
transaction or series of transactions between two or more
wholly-owned RBTT Subsidiaries or between RBTT and a
wholly-owned RBTT Subsidiary.
“RBTT Amalgamation Resolution” means the
special resolution of the RBTT Shareholders approving the
Amalgamation to be considered at the RBTT Meeting, in the form
set out in Appendix “A” to the Circular.
“RBTT Articles” means the articles of
incorporation of RBTT dated July 14, 1998.
“RBTT By-laws” means By-law No. 1 of RBTT
dated July 23, 1998.
“RBTT Contract” means any Contract to which
RBTT or any of the RBTT Subsidiaries is a party or by which RBTT
or any of the RBTT Subsidiaries is bound or affected or to which
any of their respective properties or assets is subject.
“RBTT Employee Plans” means all the employee
benefit, fringe benefit, supplemental unemployment benefit,
bonus, incentive, profit sharing, termination, change of
control, pension, retirement, stock option, stock purchase,
stock appreciation, employee loan, health, welfare, medical,
dental, disability, life insurance and similar plans,
programmes, or arrangements relating to the current or former
directors, officers or employees of RBTT or any of the RBTT
Subsidiaries maintained, sponsored or funded by RBTT or any of
the RBTT Subsidiaries, whether written or oral, funded or
unfunded, insured or self-insured, registered or unregistered
under which RBTT or any of the RBTT Subsidiaries may have any
liability, contingent or otherwise.
“RBTT Employees” means those individuals
employed by RBTT or any of the RBTT Subsidiaries.
“RBTT Exchanges” means the TTSE, the BSE and
the JSE.
“RBTT
In-The-Money
Option” means an RBTT Option with an exercise price
less than the Per Share Consideration.
“RBTT Labour and Employment Arrangements” means
the terms of any employment, collective, severance, pension,
supplemental pension, profit sharing, benefit, termination,
compensation, or similar Contracts, arrangements or policies
with or for the benefit of any officers, directors or employees
of RBTT or any RBTT Subsidiary.
“RBTT Material Adverse Effect” means any effect
that is, or would reasonably be expected to be, material and
adverse, individually or in the aggregate (i) to the
business, operations, condition (financial or otherwise), assets
or liabilities of RBTT and the RBTT Subsidiaries, taken as a
whole; or (ii) to the ability of RBTT to consummate the
transactions contemplated by the Combination Agreement before
the Outside Date, provided that in the case of clause
(i) “RBTT Material Adverse Effect” shall not
include any change or effect on the business of RBTT and the
RBTT Subsidiaries attributable to (a) changes in general
economic conditions affecting banks generally in the regions
where RBTT and the RBTT Subsidiaries conduct their business,
except to the extent that such changes are disproportionately
adverse to RBTT or any of the RBTT Subsidiaries, (b) any
actions taken or omitted to be taken by RBTT or any of the RBTT
Subsidiaries pursuant to the express terms of the Combination
Agreement, (c) the announcement of the execution and
delivery of the Combination Agreement or the transactions
contemplated by the Combination Agreement, or
(d) commencement, occurrence or continuation of any war,
armed hostilities or acts of terrorism, except to the extent
that the effects thereof are disproportionately adverse to RBTT
or any of the RBTT Subsidiaries.
“RBTT Material Contract” means any RBTT
Contract that (i) is outside the Ordinary Course of
business (and for this purpose, any RBTT Contract that involves
payments to or by RBTT or any RBTT Subsidiary in excess of
U.S.$1,000,000 annually shall be deemed to be outside of the
Ordinary Course of business), (ii) by its terms, is not
terminable within 90 days’ prior notice (without
termination fee or penalty) and that may result in total
payments by RBTT or any RBTT Subsidiary in excess of
U.S.$1,000,000, (iii) constitutes a material agreement
filed or required to be filed under applicable securities Laws
or with the Bank Regulators, (iv) constitutes a material
partnership, shareholder or joint venture arrangement with any
third party, (v) constitutes a confidentiality,
non-competition agreement or other contract or
agreement that limits the freedom of RBTT or any RBTT Subsidiary
to engage in any line of business or to compete with any Person,
(vi) involves any indemnification arrangement between RBTT
and any director or officer of RBTT or of any the RBTT
Subsidiaries, (vii) involves any guarantee or similar
obligation running from RBTT or any of the RBTT Subsidiaries to
any Person (other than an RBTT Affiliate Transaction) entered
into outside of the Ordinary Course of business in excess of
U.S.$10,000,000, (viii) relates to credit card association
memberships or ATM or debit card networks and to which RBTT or
any RBTT Material Subsidiary is a party, (ix) relates to
information technology or intellectual property that is material
to the business or operations of RBTT or the RBTT Subsidiaries,
(x) is an underwriting agreement involving a potential
liability for unfulfilled sale, placement or similar obligations
of greater than U.S.$25,000,000, (xi) relates to the
purchase and sale of financial or other futures or derivatives
(other than an RBTT Affiliate Transaction) entered into outside
of the Ordinary Course of business, (xii) relates to
interest rate or currency swaps or hedges (other than an RBTT
Affiliate Transaction) entered into outside of the Ordinary
Course of business, (xiii) relates to data processing
services or operational support (including outsourcing
arrangements), or (xiv) is otherwise material to the
business, operations or financial condition of RBTT and the RBTT
Subsidiaries, taken as a whole.
“RBTT Material Subsidiaries” means
(i) each RBTT Subsidiary, the total assets of which
constituted more than ten percent of the consolidated assets of
RBTT as of March 31, 2007 or the total revenues of which,
for the year ended March 31, 2007, constituted more than
ten percent of the consolidated revenues of RBTT, in each case
as set out in the financial statements of RBTT as of and for the
year ended March 31, 2007, (ii) each of RBTT Bank
Limited, RBTT Trust Limited, RBTT Merchant Bank Limited,
RBTT Bank N.V. and RBTT Bank Jamaica Limited, and
(iii) each RBTT Subsidiary that directly or indirectly
holds an equity interest in any RBTT Subsidiary described in
clause (i) or (ii) above.
“RBTT Meeting” means the special meeting of
RBTT Shareholders to be held on the RBTT Meeting Date, including
any adjournment or postponement thereof.
“RBTT Option Plan” means the ordinary share
option plan of RBTT, implemented by RBTT as of May 14,2002, providing for the grant of options to acquire RBTT
Ordinary Shares, as amended in accordance with the Combination
Agreement.
“RBTT Options” means options to purchase RBTT
Ordinary Shares granted under the RBTT Option Plan.
“RBTT Ordinary Shares” means the ordinary
shares in the capital of RBTT.
“RBTT
Out-Of-The-Money
Option” means an RBTT Option with an exercise price
equal to or greater than the Per Share Consideration.
“RBTT Preferred Shares” means the preferred
shares in the capital of RBTT.
“RBTT Securityholders” means the holders of
RBTT Ordinary Shares and RBTT Options.
“RBTT Shareholders” means the holders of RBTT
Ordinary Shares.
“RBTT Subsidiary” means any corporation,
partnership, joint venture or other legal entity of which RBTT
(either alone or through or together with any other subsidiary)
owns, directly or indirectly, more than 50% of the stock or
other equity interests the holders of which are generally
entitled to vote for the election of the board of directors or
other governing body of such corporation or other legal entity
or has, directly or indirectly, the right to appoint a majority
of the board of directors or other governing body of such
corporation or other legal entity.
“RBTT Superior Proposal” means any unsolicited,
bona fide, written RBTT Acquisition Proposal that
(a) contemplates the acquisition of at least 50.1% of the
outstanding RBTT Ordinary Shares or all or substantially all of
the assets of RBTT and the RBTT Subsidiaries; (b) provides
for consideration per RBTT Ordinary Share of at least TT$41.00;
and (c) in the good faith determination of the Directors in
exercising their fiduciary obligations after consultation with
their financial advisors and outside counsel (i) is
reasonably capable of being completed, taking into account the
availability of any required financing and all legal, financial,
regulatory, timing and other aspects of such proposal, and the
Person making such proposal, and (ii) would reasonably be
expected to, if consummated in accordance with its terms (but
without discounting any risk of non-completion), result in a
transaction more favourable to RBTT, and more favourable from a
financial point of view (including any financing terms, any
termination payment payable under the Combination Agreement and
any conditions to the consummation thereof), to the RBTT
Shareholders, than the transactions contemplated by the
Combination Agreement.
“Redeemable Preferred Shares” means the
redeemable preferred shares in the capital of the Corporation.
“Redemption” means the automatic redemption by
the Corporation, without any further act or formality, of the
Redeemable Preferred Shares at the Redemption Time for the
Redemption Amount in accordance with the rights,
privileges, conditions and restrictions attached to the
Redeemable Preferred Shares as set out in the Amalgamation
Agreement and the Corporation’s constating documents.
“Redemption Amount” means in respect of
each Redeemable Preferred Share an amount, in U.S. dollars,
equal to the RBC Closing Average Share Price.
“Redemption Price” means in respect of
each Redeemable Preferred Share an amount, in U.S. dollars,
equal to (i) the Redemption Amount, plus (ii) the
amount of all declared and unpaid dividends, without interest,
on each RBC Common Share with a record date occurring after the
Effective Date but prior to the date on which RBTT Ordinary
Share certificates are surrendered to the Escrow Agent in
accordance with the provisions of the Amalgamation Agreement.
“Redemption Time” means the effective time
of the Redemption, which shall occur on the Effective Date
immediately following the Effective Time.
“Registrar” means the Registrar of Companies,
as defined in the Companies Act.
“Regulatory Approvals” means those sanctions,
rulings, consents, orders, exemptions, licences, permits,
authorizations, waivers and other approvals (including the
lapse, without objection, of a prescribed time under a statute
or regulation that states that a transaction may be implemented
if a prescribed time lapses following the giving of notice
without an objection being made) of Governmental Entities or
pursuant to applicable Laws, which must be obtained in order to
consummate the transactions contemplated by the Combination
Agreement and the Ancillary Agreements in accordance with all
applicable Laws, including:
(i)
the Canadian Bank Approvals;
(ii)
approvals of, and filings with, the RBC Exchanges;
(iii)
approvals and filings by RBC under applicable securities Laws,
including in connection with the issuance of the RBC Common
Shares;
(iv)
approvals and licences under the Foreign Investment Act
(Trinidad and Tobago);
(v)
approvals of the Central Bank and Minister of Finance under the
Financial Institutions Act (Trinidad and Tobago);
(vi)
approval of the Minister of Finance under the Banking Act
(Jamaica);
(vii)
approval of the Minister of Finance under the Financial
Institutions (Amendment) Act 2006 (Barbados);
(viii)
approval, if any, of the Fair Trading Commission under the Fair
Competition Act (Barbados);
(ix)
approval of the Central Bank of the Netherlands Antilles under
the National Ordinance on the Supervision of Banking and Credit
Institutions 1994 (Netherlands Antilles);
(x)
approval of the Central Bank of Aruba under the State Ordinance
on the Supervision of the Credit System of Aruba;
(xi)
approval of the Eastern Caribbean Central Bank under Banking Act
No. 19 of 2005 (Grenada);
(xii)
approval of the Minister of Finance acting on the recommendation
of the Eastern Caribbean Central Bank under the Banking Act,
2005 (Antigua);
(xiii)
approval of the Eastern Caribbean Central Bank under the Banking
Act, 2005 (Nevis);
(xiv)
approvals of, if any, and filings with the TTSEC, FSC and BSC;
and
(xv)
approvals of, if any, and filings with the TTSE, JSE and BSE.
“Required RBTT Vote” means approval of the
transactions contemplated by the Combination Agreement,
including the RBTT Amalgamation Resolution, by a majority of no
less than 75% of the number of the votes cast by the holders of
RBTT Ordinary Shares at the RBTT Meeting, voting together as one
class, in person or by proxy.
“SEC” means the United States Securities and
Exchange Commission.
“Second Preferred Shares” means the second
preferred shares in the capital of RBC.
“Securities Industry Act” means the Securities
Industry Act (1995) (Trinidad and Tobago).
“Severance or Change of Control Plan” means any
severance, change of control, “golden parachute”,
“tin parachute”, transaction bonus, or other plan,
policy, agreement, arrangement, commitment, obligation or
understanding pursuant to which RBTT or any RBTT Subsidiary is
or will be obligated to pay any amount or provide any benefit to
(or accelerate or modify any payment or benefit to be paid or
provided to) any officer, employee or director of any of them as
a result of or in connection with the Amalgamation or any of the
other transactions contemplated by the Combination Agreement or
the Ancillary Agreements, either before, upon or after the
consummation thereof.
“Share Amount” means the product of
(a) the Collar Exchange Ratio, and (b) the RBC Closing
Average Share Price, rounded to the nearest one-tenth of one
cent (U.S.$0.001).
“Special Committee” means the special committee
of independent members of the board of directors of RBTT.
“Superintendent” means the Superintendent of
Financial Institutions (Canada) under the Bank Act.
“Superior Proposal Notice” means written
notice from RBTT advising RBC that the Directors have resolved
to accept, approve, recommend (or change, withdraw, modify or
qualify their recommendation in respect of the Amalgamation) or
enter into a Contract in respect of an RBTT Superior Proposal.
“Take-Over By-laws” means the Securities
Industry (Take-Over) By-laws, 2005.
“Taxes” means (i) any and all taxes,
duties, fees, excises, premiums, assessments, imposts, levies
and other charges or assessments of any kind whatsoever imposed
by any Governmental Entity, whether computed on a separate,
consolidated, unitary, combined or other basis, including those
levied on, or measured by, or described with respect to, income,
gross receipts, profits, gains, windfalls, capital, capital
stock, production, recapture, transfer, land transfer, licence,
gift, occupation, wealth, environment, net worth, indebtedness,
surplus, sales, goods and services, harmonized sales, use,
value-added, excise, special assessment, stamp, withholding,
business, franchising, real or personal property, health,
employee health, payroll, workers’ compensation, employment
or unemployment, severance, social services, social security,
education, utility, surtaxes, customs, import or export, and
including all licence and registration fees and all employment
insurance, health insurance and government pension plan premiums
or contributions; and (ii) all instalments, interest,
penalties, fines, additions to tax or other additional amounts
imposed by any Governmental Entity on or in respect of amounts
of the type described in clause (i) above or this clause
(ii).
“Third Party Consents” means all necessary
approvals of the applicable trustees and bondholders under the
following RBTT Contracts: (i) the trust deed dated
April 6, 2004 between RBTT and RBTT Trust Limited; and
(ii) the trust deed dated December 31, 2004 between
RBTT Bank Jamaica and RBTT Trust Limited.
“Trust or Agency Agreement” means any
instrument, indenture, declaration, agreement, will, contract,
resolution or other document under which a Person acts as an
executor, trustee, fiduciary, representative, agent (including a
custodian, paying agent or escrow agent), conservator, guardian
or in a similar capacity.
“Trust or Agency Records” means all records
maintained by RBTT and RBTT Subsidiaries relating to or in
connection with a Trust or Agency Agreement.
“TSX” means the Toronto Stock Exchange.
“TTSE” means the Trinidad and Tobago Stock
Exchange.
“TTSEC” means the Trinidad and Tobago
Securities and Exchange Commission.
“TT$” means Trinidad and Tobago dollars.
“U.S. Dollar Equivalent” means, with respect to
an amount expressed in TT$, such TT$ amount divided by the
simple average of (i) the volume-weighted average of the
buying rate, and (ii) the volume-weighted average of the
selling rate, in each case for conversion of U.S. dollars into
Trinidad and Tobago dollars as publicly reported by the Central
Bank of Trinidad and Tobago for the five (5) consecutive
trading days ending on the second Business Day immediately
preceding the Effective Date and then rounded to the nearest one
tenth of one cent (U.S.$0.001).
“Unadjusted Share Amount” means the U.S. Dollar
Equivalent of TT$16.00 calculated on the second Business Day
immediately preceding the Effective Date.
“U.S.$” means U.S. dollars.
“Voting Agreements” means the voting agreements
dated October 1, 2007 between RBC and each of the:
(i) Principal Shareholders; (ii) Directors; and
(iii) Executive Officers.
The following is a summary of certain information contained
in the Circular. This summary is not intended to be complete and
is qualified in its entirety by the more detailed information
and financial statements, including the notes thereto, contained
elsewhere in the Circular and the attached Appendices, all of
which are important and should be reviewed carefully.
Capitalized terms used in this summary without definition have
the meanings ascribed to them in the Glossary of Terms or
elsewhere in the Circular. All dollar figures or references to
“$” in the Circular, unless otherwise specifically
stated, are references to U.S. currency, except (i) the
financial information concerning RBTT, where such references,
unless otherwise specifically stated, are references to Trinidad
and Tobago currency, and (ii) the financial information
concerning RBC, where such references, unless otherwise
specifically stated, are references to Canadian currency.
RBTT. RBTT provides financial services which
include corporate, international, commercial and retail banking,
merchant and investment banking, trust and fiduciary services,
asset and investment management and stockbroker services to a
large client base located throughout the Caribbean.
RBC. RBC, together with its subsidiaries, is
Canada’s largest bank as measured by assets and market
capitalization and one of North America’s leading
diversified financial services companies.
RBC Holdings (Trinidad &
Tobago). RBC Holdings (Trinidad &
Tobago) is a Trinidad and Tobago corporation and an indirect
wholly-owned subsidiary of RBC. RBC Holdings
(Trinidad & Tobago) was incorporated solely for the
purpose of effecting the Amalgamation described in the Circular.
The RBTT Meeting will be held in the Ballroom of the Hilton
Trinidad & Conference Centre, Lady Young Road,
St. Ann’s, Trinidad, on Wednesday, March 26,2008 at 9:30 a.m.
(Port-of-Spain
time). The purpose of the RBTT Meeting is to consider the RBTT
Amalgamation Resolution.
Approval of the RBTT Amalgamation Resolution requires the
affirmative vote of not less than 75% of the votes validly cast
in person or by proxy at the RBTT Meeting by RBTT Shareholders
voting together as a class.
The Companies Act provides that each RBTT Shareholder will have
the right to dissent and to have his or her RBTT Ordinary Shares
cancelled by RBTT in exchange for a cash payment equal to the
fair value of his or her RBTT Ordinary Shares. It is important
that RBTT Shareholders who wish to dissent comply strictly with
the applicable procedures set forth in the Companies Act.
On October 1, 2007, each of the Principal Shareholders,
Directors and Executive Officers entered into the Voting
Agreements with RBTT pursuant to which each of the Principal
Shareholders, Directors and Executive Officers agreed that they
will support the Amalgamation and the transactions contemplated
thereby.
If the RBTT Amalgamation Resolution is approved and the
conditions set out in the Combination Agreement are satisfied,
at the Effective Time on the Effective Date, RBTT and RBC
Holdings (Trinidad & Tobago), an indirect wholly-owned
Trinidad and Tobago subsidiary of RBC, will amalgamate and
continue as one company, the Corporation.
Pursuant to the Amalgamation and certain related transactions,
the total consideration for each RBTT Ordinary Share will have a
value of approximately TT$40.00, subject to variation in certain
circumstances as further described in the Circular. As described
in more detail below, for each RBTT Ordinary Share held, an RBTT
Shareholder will receive the Cash Amount (TT$24.00 or its
equivalent in U.S.$), and, after the issuance and redemption of
the Redeemable Preferred Shares, a fractional number of RBC
Common Shares equal to the Collar Exchange Ratio (based on the
U.S. Dollar Equivalent of TT$16.00).
Pursuant to the Amalgamation and at the Effective Time, all RBTT
Ordinary Shares (other than those RBTT Ordinary Shares held by
Dissenting Shareholders) will be cancelled by the Corporation in
exchange for a combination of cash and Redeemable Preferred
Shares as set out in the Amalgamation Agreement. The Corporation
will automatically redeem the Redeemable Preferred Shares
without any action on the part of the holder of such Redeemable
Preferred Shares, and the Escrow Agent will subscribe for, and
as soon as practicable thereafter deliver to the holders of such
Redeemable Preferred Shares a number of RBC Common Shares, all
in the manner set forth in the Amalgamation Agreement.
The Amalgamation and related transactions (including the
issuance and subsequent redemption of the Redeemable Preferred
Shares) have been structured in the manner described herein to
meet a variety of objectives including: (i) to comply with
the Bank Act which prevents a subsidiary of RBC from holding RBC
Common Shares, (ii) to comply with certain regulatory
requirements under the FIA, and (iii) to qualify as an
amalgamation for purposes of applicable corporate and tax laws.
Upon the completion of the Closing, an RBTT Shareholder (other
than a Dissenting Shareholder) whose RBTT share certificates
have been surrendered to the Escrow Agent will receive an amount
of cash and RBC Common Shares as described immediately below,
without any further action on the part of such RBTT Shareholder.
An RBTT Shareholder (other than a Dissenting Shareholder) will
therefore receive, as consideration for each RBTT Ordinary Share
held, the following:
1.
the Cash Amount, being TT$24.00 (or, at the election of the RBTT
Shareholder, the equivalent in U.S. dollars based on the five
(5) day weighted average rate of exchange for the period
ending on the second Business Day preceding the Amalgamation);
and
2.
a fractional number of RBC Common Shares equal to the Collar
Exchange Ratio, which ratio will be determined by dividing the
Unadjusted Share Amount (being the U.S. Dollar Equivalent of
TT$16.00) by a specified price as determined below.
The Collar Exchange Ratio will be determined by dividing the
U.S. Dollar Equivalent of TT$16.00 by a specified price as set
forth below:
•
If the RBC Closing Average Share Price is between U.S.$48.980
and U.S.$59.864, then the specified price for determining the
Collar Exchange Ratio will be this RBC Closing Average Share
Price.
•
If the RBC Closing Average Share Price is equal to or greater
than U.S.$59.864, then the specified price for determining the
Collar Exchange Ratio will be deemed to be U.S.$59.864.
•
If the RBC Closing Average Share Price is less than or equal to
U.S.$48.980, then the specified price for determining the Collar
Exchange Ratio will be deemed to be U.S.$48.980.
As a result, the number of RBC Common Shares to be received by
RBTT Shareholders following the completion of the Amalgamation
is subject to a plus or minus 10% “collar” based on
the Collar Price of U.S.$54.422 (the average trading price of
RBC Common Shares on the NYSE for the five (5) consecutive
trading days ending on September 28, 2007, the last date of
trading before the execution of the Combination Agreement by RBC
and RBTT).
If the RBC Closing Average Share Price remains between
U.S.$48.980 and U.S.$59.864: (i) the value of the RBC
Common Shares to be received for each RBTT Ordinary Share
following the completion of the Amalgamation will be TT$16.00;
and (ii) the Per Share Consideration will be TT$40.00.
Any RBTT Shareholder who wishes to receive the U.S. Dollar
Equivalent of the Cash Amount must so elect by the Election
Deadline. Any RBTT Shareholder who fails to make such an
election by the Election Deadline will be deemed to have elected
to receive the Cash Amount in Trinidad and Tobago dollars.
It is anticipated that the Amalgamation will become effective in
the second quarter of 2008 after required regulatory and other
approvals have been obtained and all other conditions to
completion of the Amalgamation have been satisfied or waived.
RBTT Shareholders are required to surrender to the Escrow Agent,
for cancellation, on behalf of the Corporation, the certificate
or certificates which prior to the Effective Time represented
RBTT Ordinary Shares, in order to obtain the consideration that
the RBTT Shareholder is entitled to receive following the
completion of the Amalgamation. RBTT Shareholders will receive
further instructions regarding the procedures for the exchange
of their share certificates in advance of the Closing Date.
In the event that RBTT Shareholders wish to sell RBC Common
Shares received in connection with the Amalgamation in the open
market, RBTT, through its wholly-owned stockbroking subsidiary,
West Indies Stockbrokers Limited, will facilitate trading in RBC
Common Shares in order to permit such sales on a real-time
basis, thereby providing liquidity to RBTT Shareholders. Further
details regarding these matters will be communicated at a later
date. Other stockbrokers, operating in Trinidad and Tobago and
in other regional markets, may also offer similar services.
RBC has committed to the creation of a depository receipt
structure in which units denominated in TT$ and issued under a
deposit agreement representing RBC Common Shares, will be listed
on the TTSE, and subject to the factors set forth in section 6.2
of the Circular.
The Directors have (i) determined that the Amalgamation is
fair to RBTT Shareholders and in the best interests of all RBTT
stakeholders, (ii) unanimously approved the terms of the
Combination Agreement, and (iii) recommended that RBTT
Shareholders vote in favour of the RBTT Amalgamation Resolution.
In making their recommendation, the Directors considered a
number of factors which should also be considered by RBTT
Shareholders in evaluating whether or not to approve the RBTT
Amalgamation Resolution.
There are tax considerations to RBTT Shareholders in connection
with the Amalgamation. RBTT Shareholders should consult their
own tax advisors having regard to their own particular
circumstances.
In deciding to approve the terms of the Combination Agreement
and recommend that RBTT Shareholders vote in favour of the RBTT
Amalgamation Resolution, the Directors considered the
(i) advice and Fairness Opinion of Credit Suisse and
(ii) Fairness Opinion of Merrill Lynch. The Fairness
Opinions each conclude that the Per Share Consideration is fair,
from a financial point of view, to the RBTT Shareholders. The
full texts of the Fairness Opinions which set forth the
assumptions made, information reviewed, matters considered and
limitations on the scope of the reviews undertaken are attached
as Appendix “B” and Appendix “C” to the
Circular. Credit Suisse and Merrill Lynch provided their
Fairness Opinions to the Directors solely for their information
in connection with their evaluation of the Per Share
Consideration from a financial point of view, and such Fairness
Opinions do not address any other aspect of the proposed
Amalgamation and do not constitute a recommendation to any RBTT
Shareholder as to how such RBTT Shareholder should vote or act
with respect to any matters relating to the Amalgamation.
RBTT Shareholders should be aware that a number of Directors and
Executive Officers may have interests in the Amalgamation
different from, or in addition to, the interests of RBTT
Shareholders.
The Combination Agreement contains certain mutual conditions to
Closing, including: (i) the securing of the Required RBTT
Vote; (ii) the issuance of the Certificate of Amalgamation;
(iii) the obtaining of the Regulatory Approvals;
(iv) the occurrence of Closing prior to September 30,2008; (v) the absence of legal constraints to the
completion of the Amalgamation; and (vi) the RBC Common
Shares issuable pursuant to the Amalgamation (A) having
been duly approved and authorized, including by any applicable
securities commission, (B) not being (subject to certain
exceptions) subject to any resale restrictions, and
(C) having been approved for listing on the RBC Exchanges.
The Combination Agreement also contains certain reciprocal
conditions to Closing for the benefit of each Party, including
each Party’s representations and warranties being accurate
and each Party’s covenants being fulfilled to the degree
required by the Combination Agreement, and the absence of any
RBTT Material Adverse Effect or RBC Material Adverse Effect
since October 1, 2007.
The Combination Agreement also contains certain additional
conditions to Closing for the benefit of RBC, including, among
others: (i) RBTT Shareholders holding no more than 5% of
the outstanding RBTT Ordinary Shares having exercised Dissent
Rights; (ii) the obtaining of (A) the Canadian Bank
Approvals and (B) the Regulatory Approvals relating to the
issuance of RBC Common Shares following the completion of the
Amalgamation, on terms satisfactory to RBC; and (iii) the
entering into of certain employment contracts with the Group
Chief Executive Officer of RBTT and at least four other
Executive Officers on terms satisfactory to RBC.
In the Combination Agreement, RBTT has agreed not to solicit or
encourage any RBTT Acquisition Proposals. Nevertheless, RBTT is
permitted to consider and accept an RBTT Superior Proposal under
certain conditions. RBC has the right to match any RBTT
Acquisition Proposal that the Directors have decided is an RBTT
Superior Proposal in accordance with the terms and conditions of
the Combination Agreement. RBTT’s right to consider RBTT
Superior Proposals continues only until the RBTT Meeting. If the
Directors accept an RBTT Superior Proposal, RBTT must pay RBC a
termination payment pursuant to the terms of the Combination
Agreement.
Either RBTT or RBC may terminate the Combination Agreement if
the other party has breached or failed to perform any
representation, warranty, covenant or agreement to the degree
required by the Combination Agreement. In addition, the
Combination Agreement may be terminated prior to the Effective
Date:
•
by the mutual agreement of the Parties;
•
by either RBTT or RBC, if any law is passed that makes
completion of the transactions contemplated by the Combination
Agreement illegal or otherwise prohibited;
•
by RBC if (i) the Directors withdraw or change in a manner
adverse to RBC their approval or recommendation of the
Combination Agreement or the Amalgamation, or (ii) the
Directors recommend an RBTT Acquisition Proposal or an RBTT
Superior Proposal, or if RBTT has wilfully breached its
obligations under the non-solicitation provisions of the
Combination Agreement in any material respect;
•
by RBC, if the Amalgamation is not submitted for the approval of
RBTT Shareholders at the RBTT Meeting by the RBTT Meeting Date;
•
by RBTT, in order to enter into a definitive written agreement
with respect to an RBTT Superior Proposal, provided RBC has been
given the opportunity to match the RBTT Superior Proposal in
accordance with the terms of the Combination Agreement and any
termination payment required to be paid pursuant to the
Combination Agreement is paid;
•
by RBC, if RBTT enters into an agreement, other than as
permitted under the Combination Agreement, which facilitates an
RBTT Acquisition Proposal;
•
by RBTT or RBC if the Required RBTT Vote is not obtained at the
RBTT Meeting; or
•
by RBTT or RBC if any of the Regulatory Approvals have not been
obtained prior to the Closing Date.
Additionally, if the Closing Date does not occur on or prior to
September 30, 2008, then the Combination Agreement may be
terminated by RBC (unless such failure is principally the result
of a material default by RBC of its obligations under the
Combination Agreement) or RBTT (unless such failure is
principally the result of a material default by RBTT of its
obligations under the Combination Agreement).
RBC is entitled to a termination payment in the U.S. Dollar
Equivalent of approximately TT$343.8 million upon the
occurrence of any of the following events:
•
RBTT terminates the Combination Agreement in order to enter into
a definitive written agreement with respect to an RBTT Superior
Proposal;
the Directors have (x) failed to recommend or changed, in a
manner adverse to RBC, their approval or recommendation of the
Combination Agreement or the Amalgamation, or
(y) recommended an RBTT Acquisition Proposal or an RBTT
Superior Proposal, or if RBTT has wilfully breached the
non-solicitation obligations of the Combination Agreement in any
material respect;
•
the Amalgamation is not submitted for the approval of RBTT
Shareholders at the RBTT Meeting by the RBTT Meeting Date; or
•
RBTT enters into an agreement other than as permitted under the
Combination Agreement which facilitates an RBTT Acquisition
Proposal;
•
either RBTT or RBC terminates the Combination Agreement because:
•
the other party has breached or failed to perform any
representation, warranty, covenant or agreement to the degree
required by the Combination Agreement; or
•
the Required RBTT Vote has not been obtained at the RBTT Meeting;
and
•
a bona fide RBTT Acquisition Proposal has been made by
any Person other than RBC prior to the RBTT Meeting and is not
withdrawn by the date of the RBTT Meeting;
•
the Required RBTT Vote is not obtained at the RBTT Meeting; and
•
RBTT (A) consummates an RBTT Acquisition Proposal or
(B) enters into an agreement with respect to an RBTT
Acquisition Proposal with such Person or any of its Affiliates,
in either case prior to the expiration of twelve
(12) months following the RBTT Meeting Date; or
•
either RBTT or RBC terminates the Combination Agreement because
the Closing Date does not occur on or prior to
September 30, 2008 in circumstances where (i) a
bona fide RBTT Acquisition Proposal has been made by any
Person other than RBC prior to the date of such termination, and
(ii) RBTT (A) consummates an RBTT Acquisition Proposal
or (B) enters into an agreement with respect to an RBTT
Acquisition Proposal with such Person or any of its Affiliates,
in either case prior to the expiration of twelve
(12) months following the termination of the Combination
Agreement.
Pursuant to the Combination Agreement, the RBTT Option Plan has
been amended such that, subject to and conditional upon Closing,
(i) all issued and outstanding RBTT Options will be deemed
to have vested, immediately prior to the Effective Time;
(ii) each unexercised RBTT
In-The-Money
Option will be deemed cancelled, immediately prior to the
Effective Time, in exchange for a cash amount equal to the
difference between the Per Share Consideration and its exercise
price; (iii) each RBTT
Out-Of-The-Money
Option will be cancelled immediately prior to the Effective Time
without payment of any further consideration; and (iv) no
exercises of RBTT Options shall be permitted from and after the
date that is five (5) Business Days prior to the Closing
Date.
Completion of the Amalgamation is subject to approvals from
regulatory authorities (or the expiry of applicable waiting
periods) in Canada and several Caribbean jurisdictions.
The RBTT Ordinary Shares will be delisted from the RBTT
Exchanges after the Effective Time.
RBC Common Shares are traded on the RBC Exchanges under the
symbol “RY”. Pursuant to the terms of the Combination
Agreement, RBC has agreed to apply to the RBC Exchanges to list
the RBC Common Shares to be issued following the completion of
the Amalgamation, and this is a condition to the completion of
the Amalgamation.
The following table provides the closing price per share of RBTT
Ordinary Shares on the TTSE and the closing price per share of
RBC Common Shares on the TSX and NYSE on the dates indicated.
The last full trading day of the RBTT Ordinary Shares
before public announcement of the Amalgamation. The closing
price per share of RBC Common Shares on October 1,2007, which was the last full trading day of the RBC Common
Shares before public announcement of the Amalgamation, was
CDN$55.93 and U.S.$56.39, as reported on the TSX and NYSE,
respectively.
(2)
The last full trading day of the RBTT Ordinary Shares
before the date of the Circular. The closing price per share of
RBC Common Shares on February 7, 2008, which was the
last full trading day of the RBC Common Shares before the
date of the Circular, was CDN$51.29 and U.S.$50.71, as reported
on the TSX and NYSE, respectively.
The dividend paid on each RBTT Ordinary Share in the fourth
quarter of 2007 was TT$0.60 per RBTT Ordinary Share, which was
on par with the dividend paid in the fourth quarter of 2006.
RBC’s first quarter of 2008 dividend will be CDN$0.50 per
RBC Common Share, which is an increase from its first quarter of
2007 quarterly dividend of CDN$0.40 per RBC Common Share.
On October 1, 2007, RBTT and the RBC entered into a
combination agreement, the effect of which will result in RBC
indirectly acquiring RBTT. Pursuant to the Combination
Agreement, RBC has incorporated a private limited liability
company in Trinidad and Tobago, indirectly wholly-owned by it,
which will amalgamate with RBTT. The Companies Act permits two
or more companies to amalgamate and to continue as one single
entity by law. In accordance with the Companies Act and RBTT
By-laws, such an amalgamation is conditional upon a 75%
favourable vote by shareholders voting at a special
shareholders’ meeting, in person or by proxy, called for
the purpose of approving such an amalgamation.
The Circular contains a detailed description of the Amalgamation
and relevant information in connection therewith. RBTT
Shareholders are therefore urged to read the Circular, including
the Appendices attached thereto, in its entirety. The Circular
conforms with applicable securities laws of Trinidad and Tobago,
Jamaica and Barbados, where the shares of RBTT are listed, and
is in conformity with the regulations, rules and practices of
the securities commissions of these jurisdictions and, where
applicable, the RBTT Exchanges.
The RBTT Meeting to consider, and if thought fit, approve the
RBTT Amalgamation Resolution to give effect to the Amalgamation
is scheduled to be convened on Wednesday, March 26, 2008,
and the requisite notice is forwarded to RBTT Shareholders with
the Circular.
RBTT was incorporated in the Republic of Trinidad and Tobago in
July 1998 for the purpose of functioning as a holding company to
acquire and hold the investments of RBTT in subsidiary and
financial services entities, which investments were previously
held by the main banking entity, RBTT Bank Limited (formerly The
Royal Bank of Trinidad and Tobago Limited). RBTT provides
financial services which include corporate, international,
commercial and retail banking, merchant and investment banking,
trust and fiduciary services, asset and investment management
and stockbroker services to a large client base located
throughout the Caribbean, including the Dutch speaking
Caribbean, and Suriname in South America. In the past several
years, RBTT has expanded significantly, growing to a
multi-service regional financial institution, with a network
that comprises a staff of more than 5,300 persons, 83 branches,
217 ATMs and more than 6,000
point-of-sale
terminals in 12 legal jurisdictions.
RBTT conducts its business through 24 operating subsidiaries and
associate companies located in 12 legal jurisdictions throughout
the Caribbean from Jamaica in the north, to the Eastern
Caribbean, Trinidad in the south, Suriname on the mainland of
South America, the Netherlands Antilles and Aruba. Subsidiary
companies of RBTT include ten (10) commercial banks with an
extensive network of bank branches, ATMs and
point-of-sale
terminals located in all jurisdictions in which they operate.
RBTT also has investment/merchant, and trust and asset
management and stockbroking subsidiaries located in Trinidad and
Tobago. The subsidiaries and associate companies of RBTT are
engaged in commercial, development and investment banking, trust
and asset management, stockbroking, and property development.
RBTT’s corporate headquarters are located at Royal Court,
19-21 Park Street,
Port-of-Spain,
Trinidad and Tobago, West Indies. RBTT’s telephone number
is
(868) 625-7288.
2.2
RBC
For the purposes of this section of the Circular entitled
“The Parties — RBC” only, the term
“RBC” refers to RBC and its subsidiaries.
RBC is Canada’s largest bank as measured by assets and
market capitalization and one of North America’s leading
diversified financial services companies. RBC provides personal
and commercial banking, wealth management services, insurance,
corporate and investment banking and transaction processing
services on a global basis. RBC employs more than 70,000 full-
and part-time employees who serve more than 15 million
personal, business, public sector and institutional clients
through offices in Canada, the U.S. and 36 other countries. RBC
is organized into four business segments as follows:
•
Canadian Banking comprises RBC’s domestic personal
and business banking operations, certain retail investment
businesses and RBC’s global insurance operations;
Wealth Management comprises businesses that directly
serve the growing wealth management needs of affluent and high
net worth clients in Canada, the U.S. and outside North America,
and businesses that provide asset management and trust products
through RBC and external partners;
•
U.S. & International Banking comprises RBC’s
banking businesses outside Canada, including RBC’s banking
operations in the U.S. and Caribbean. In addition, this segment
includes RBC’s 50% ownership in RBC Dexia Investor
Services; and
•
Capital Markets comprises RBC’s global wholesale
banking business, which provides a wide range of corporate and
investment banking, sales and trading, research and related
products and services to corporations, public sector and
institutional clients in North America, and specialized products
and services in select global markets.
All other enterprise level activities that are not allocated to
the above-noted four business segments are reported by RBC under
a fifth segment, Corporate Support.
RBC’s corporate headquarters are located at Royal Bank
Plaza, 200 Bay Street, Toronto, Ontario, Canada and its head
office is located at 1 Place Ville-Marie, Montreal, Quebec,
Canada. RBC’s telephone number is
(416) 955-7802.
2.3
RBC
Holdings (Trinidad & Tobago)
RBC Holdings (Trinidad & Tobago) is a Trinidad and
Tobago corporation and an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of
RBC. RBC Holdings (Trinidad & Tobago) was incorporated
solely for the purpose of effecting the Amalgamation described
in the Circular. RBC Holdings (Trinidad & Tobago) is
authorized to issue an unlimited number of ordinary shares and
preference shares. The preference shares will be registered with
the TTSEC prior to the Closing Date.
The purpose of the RBTT Meeting is for RBTT Shareholders to
consider and, if thought fit, approve the RBTT Amalgamation
Resolution.
3.2 Date,
Time, and Place of RBTT Meeting
The RBTT Meeting will be held on Wednesday, March 26, 2008,
at 9:30 a.m. in the Ballroom of the Hilton Trinidad &
Conference Centre, Lady Young Road, St. Ann’s, Trinidad.
3.3
General
Rights of RBTT Shareholders Prior to and at the RBTT
Meeting
Record
Date
In accordance with applicable law, the Directors have fixed
February 18, 2008 as the record date for the determination
of RBTT Shareholders who are entitled to receive notice of and
vote at the RBTT Meeting. Only RBTT Shareholders on record at
the close of business on the Record Date are therefore entitled
to receive notice of and vote at the RBTT Meeting. RBTT
Shareholders for this purpose will include those persons whose
RBTT Ordinary Shares are held in any Clearing Agency. A list of
RBTT Shareholders on record on the Record Date will be available
for examination by RBTT Shareholders at RBTT’s Registered
Office, Royal Court 19-21 Park Street,
Port-of-Spain,
Trinidad during usual business hours and at the RBTT Meeting.
Appointment
of Proxies
An RBTT Shareholder who wishes to appoint some other person to
represent such RBTT Shareholder at the RBTT Meeting may do so by
crossing out the name on the Proxy Form and inserting the name
of the person proposed in the blank space provided in such Proxy
Form or by completing another acceptable Proxy Form. Such other
person need not be an RBTT Shareholder. If the RBTT Shareholder
is not an individual, it must have the Proxy Form executed by a
duly authorized officer or properly appointed attorney.
Procedure
and Process
To be valid, proxies must be completed, signed, dated and either
deposited with the Corporate Secretary at RBTT’s Registered
Office, Royal Court, 19-21 Park Street,
Port-of-Spain,
Trinidad and Tobago, before 9:30 a.m. on March 25, 2008 or,
in the event that the RBTT Meeting is adjourned or postponed, 48
hours (excluding Saturdays, Sundays and
holidays) before the adjourned or postponed RBTT Meeting is
reconvened. An undated but executed Proxy Form will be deemed to
be dated the date of the Circular.
It is expected that solicitation of proxies will be made
primarily by mail but proxies may also be solicited personally
by employees or agents of RBTT. RBTT may retain a solicitation
agent to assist in the solicitation of proxies with respect to
the RBTT Meeting.
Revocation
of Proxies
An RBTT Shareholder who has given a proxy may revoke the proxy
by:
(a)
depositing an instrument in writing executed by the RBTT
Shareholder or by the RBTT Shareholder’s attorney
authorized in writing (i) at the registered office of RBTT
at any time up to and including the last Business Day preceding
the day of the RBTT Meeting, or any adjournment or postponement
of the RBTT Meeting, at which the proxy is to be used or
(ii) with the Chairman of the RBTT Meeting, prior to the
commencement of the RBTT Meeting on the day of the RBTT Meeting,
or on the day of any adjournment or postponement thereof; or
(b)
in any other manner permitted by law.
Voting
In
Person
An RBTT Shareholder who attends the RBTT Meeting in person will
be entitled to vote for or against the RBTT Amalgamation
Resolution.
By
Proxy
With regards to those RBTT Shareholders who do not attend the
RBTT Meeting in person, the persons designated by such RBTT
Shareholders in the enclosed Proxy Form will vote on the RBTT
Amalgamation Resolution in accordance with the instructions of
the RBTT Shareholder as indicated on the Proxy Form. In the
absence of such direction, the person(s) will vote FOR the RBTT
Amalgamation Resolution.
Required
Vote
The RBTT Amalgamation Resolution requires the affirmative vote
of not less than 75% of the votes validly cast by RBTT
Shareholders voting together as a class present in person or
represented by proxy and entitled to vote at the RBTT Meeting.
3.4
Rights
and Obligations of RBTT Shareholders Subsequent to the RBTT
Meeting
Rights
and obligations of RBTT Shareholders voting in favour of the
RBTT Amalgamation Resolution
If the Required RBTT Vote is obtained and the other conditions
set out in the Combination Agreement are satisfied, RBTT
Shareholders who have voted in favour of the RBTT Amalgamation
Resolution will have certain rights and obligations, including,
among other things, the right to receive the Per Share
Consideration by following certain procedures relating to the
exchange of RBTT Ordinary Share certificates, all as set forth
in greater detail in Parts 4 and 5 of the Circular. Further
details regarding the rights and obligations of RBTT
Shareholders in connection with the Amalgamation are set forth
in the applicable sections of the Circular, and RBTT
Shareholders are therefore urged to read the Circular in its
entirety.
Rights
and obligations of RBTT Shareholders voting against the RBTT
Amalgamation Resolution
If the Required RBTT Vote is obtained and the other conditions
set out in the Combination Agreement are satisfied, RBTT
Shareholders who have voted against the RBTT Amalgamation
Resolution (and have not exercised Dissent Rights in the manner
set forth below), will be treated in the same manner under the
Amalgamation as RBTT Shareholders who have voted in favour of
the RBTT Amalgamation Resolution. As such, these RBTT
Shareholders will have certain rights and obligations,
including, among other things, the right to receive the Per
Share Consideration by following certain procedures relating to
the exchange of RBTT Ordinary Share certificates, all as set
forth in greater detail in Parts 4 and 5 of the Circular.
Further details regarding the rights and obligations of RBTT
Shareholders in connection with the Amalgamation are set forth
in the applicable sections of the Circular, and RBTT
Shareholders are therefore urged to read the Circular in its
entirety.
RBTT Shareholders who oppose the RBTT Amalgamation Resolution
are entitled to dissent in accordance with the applicable
procedures set forth under the Companies Act. Under sections 227
to 236, inclusive, of the Companies Act, RBTT Shareholders have
a statutory right of dissent in respect of the Amalgamation.
RBTT Shareholders who object to the RBTT Amalgamation Resolution
are entitled to exercise the Dissent Rights.
A summary of Dissent Rights and the process to exercise such
rights is set forth in the succeeding paragraphs. This summary
of the Dissent Rights is qualified in its entirety by reference
to the Companies Act.
An RBTT Shareholder who intends to exercise the Dissent Rights
must send a Dissent Notice to RBTT at RBTT Financial Holdings
Limited, Royal Court, 19-21 Park Street,
Port-of-Spain,
Trinidad, for the attention of the Corporate Secretary, to be
actually received at or before the RBTT Meeting. If a Dissenting
Shareholder attends the RBTT Meeting and votes the RBTT Shares
in favour of the RBTT Amalgamation Resolution he will be deemed
to have withdrawn his dissent.
3.6
Dissent
Rights Following the RBTT Meeting
If the RBTT Amalgamation Resolution is passed at the RBTT
Meeting, RBTT must, within 10 days after the RBTT
Amalgamation Resolution is passed at the RBTT Meeting, send to
every Dissenting Shareholder, a Notice of Intention stating that
the RBTT Amalgamation Resolution has been adopted, and advising
the Dissenting Shareholder that if the Dissenting Shareholder
intends to proceed with its exercise of its Dissent Rights, it
must send to RBTT, within 20 days of receiving the Notice
of Intention, an Information Statement containing the following
information specified in section 228(1) of the Companies Act:
(i) his name and address, (ii) the number and class of
the Dissenting Shares and (iii) a demand for payment of the
fair value of his Dissenting Shares. The Dissenting Shareholder
must also send to RBTT or its transfer agent, within
30 days of the sending of the Information Statement, the
certificates representing his Dissenting Shares. Failure to do
so will prevent the Dissenting Shareholder from exercising his
rights as a Dissenting Shareholder under Section 228 of the
Companies Act. After sending the Information Statement, unless
(i) the Dissenting Shareholder withdraws the Information
Statement before RBTT makes a written offer for his Dissenting
Shares, (ii) RBTT fails to make an offer for his Dissenting
Shares, or (iii) the Amalgamation Agreement is terminated,
a Dissenting Shareholder ceases to have any rights as an RBTT
Shareholder other than the right to be paid the fair value of
his Dissenting Shares.
A Dissenting Shareholder who sends such an Information Statement
may not withdraw from its dissent unless the Dissenting
Shareholder withdraws its Information Statement before RBTT
makes a written offer for the shares of the Dissenting
Shareholder in accordance with the provisions of section 230 of
the Companies Act. At the Effective Time, a Dissenting
Shareholder (other than those Dissenting Shareholders who have
withdrawn from their dissent as described in the preceding
sentence) will be deemed to have transferred to RBTT all of its
Dissenting Shares. RBTT will pay to each Dissenting Shareholder
the amount agreed to between RBTT and the Dissenting Shareholder
for its Dissenting Shares.
Any offer made by RBTT for the shares of Dissenting Shareholders
shall be on the same terms for all Dissenting Shareholders.
If RBTT fails to make an offer for the shares of the Dissenting
Shareholder under section 230(1) of the Companies Act, or if a
Dissenting Shareholder fails to accept the offer made by RBTT,
RBTT may, within 50 days after the action approved by the
RBTT Amalgamation Resolution is effective, apply to the
applicable court to fix a fair value for the shares of any
Dissenting Shareholders. If RBTT fails to make such application
to the court, a Dissenting Shareholder may, within 70 days
after the action approved by the RBTT Amalgamation Resolution is
effective, apply to the court to fix a fair value for the shares
of any Dissenting Shareholders.
Under the Amalgamation Agreement, if a Dissenting Shareholder
fails to strictly comply with the foregoing requirements of the
Companies Act, the RBTT Ordinary Shares of the Dissenting
Shareholder shall be deemed to be cancelled and exchanged, at
the Effective Time, for the right to receive cash and Redeemable
Preferred Shares and each such Redeemable Preferred Share shall
be redeemed as of the Redemption Time in accordance with
and subject to the provisions of the Amalgamation Agreement,
without any interest thereon.
If a Dissenting Shareholder strictly complies with the foregoing
requirements of the Dissent Rights, but: (i) the
Amalgamation Agreement is terminated; or (ii) the RBTT
Shareholders revoke RBTT’s authority to effect the
Amalgamation, then the Dissenting Shareholder’s rights as
an RBTT Shareholder will be fully reinstated and the right of
any Dissenting Shareholder to be paid the fair value of his
Dissenting Shares pursuant to the Companies Act shall cease as
provided in section 229 of the Companies Act.
RBTT must give RBC prompt notice of any demands, withdrawals, or
other notices received by RBTT for or with respect to claims by
the Dissenting Shareholders under sections 227 to 236 of the
Companies Act, and RBTT shall have the right to participate in
and direct all negotiations and proceedings with respect to such
demands and notices. RBTT may not, except with the prior written
consent of RBC, make any payment with respect to, or settle or
offer to settle, any such demands or agree to do any of the
foregoing.
RBTT Shareholders who wish to exercise Dissent Rights are
advised that it is in their best interest to consult their legal
advisers with respect to the legal rights available to them in
relation to the Amalgamation and with respect to the manner in
which to exercise such rights.
3.7
Voting
Agreements
As of February 8, 2008, Directors and Executive Officers
beneficially owned an aggregate of 2,329,351 RBTT Ordinary
Shares (approximately 0.68% of the aggregate RBTT Ordinary
Shares then outstanding). To the knowledge of the Directors and
Executive Officers, as of February 8, 2008, other than
Guardian Holdings Limited (which has entered into a voting
agreement with RBC as described below) and the National
Insurance Board, no person beneficially owned or exercised
control directly or indirectly over more than 10% of all issued
and outstanding RBTT Ordinary Shares.
On October 1, 2007, each of the Principal Shareholders,
Directors and Executive Officers entered into the Voting
Agreements with RBC pursuant to which the Principal
Shareholders, Directors and Executive Officers agreed that they
will support the Amalgamation, the RBTT Amalgamation Resolution
and the transactions contemplated thereby.
Pursuant to the Voting Agreements, each of the Principal
Shareholders, Directors and Executive Officers has agreed, among
other things, that until the earlier of (i) one Business
Day following the RBTT Meeting Date, (ii) concurrently with
the termination of the Combination Agreement in accordance with
its terms, and (iii) the Outside Date, such Principal
Shareholder, Director or Executive Officer, as the case may be,
will:
•
vote all of the RBTT Ordinary Shares held or beneficially owned
by him, her or it in favour of the Amalgamation and the RBTT
Amalgamation Resolution;
•
not exercise any rights attaching to the Principal
Shareholder’s, Director’s or Executive Officer’s
RBTT Ordinary Shares to oppose any proposed action by RBC, or
any of its subsidiaries in respect of the Amalgamation, or
support any proposed action by any other Person which might
reasonably be regarded as being directed towards or likely to
prevent or delay the successful completion of the Amalgamation;
•
not option, sell, transfer, dispose of, gift, pledge, encumber,
grant a security interest in, hypothecate or otherwise convey
the Principal Shareholder’s, Director’s or Executive
Officer’s RBTT Ordinary Shares or RBTT Options, as
applicable, or any right or interest therein (legal or
equitable), to any Person;
•
not grant or agree to grant any proxy or other right to vote the
Principal Shareholder’s, Director’s or Executive
Officer’s RBTT Ordinary Shares or enter into any voting
trust, vote pooling or other agreement with respect to the right
to vote, call meetings of shareholders or give consents or
approval of any kind as to the Principal Shareholder’s,
Director’s or Executive Officer’s RBTT Ordinary
Shares, other than a proxy or voting instruction form directing
the holder to vote such Principal Shareholder’s,
Director’s or Executive Officer’s RBTT Ordinary Shares
at the RBTT Meeting in favour of the Amalgamation and the RBTT
Amalgamation Resolution;
•
not, directly or indirectly, negotiate with, solicit, initiate
or encourage submission of proposals or offers from, or provide
information to, any other Person, entity or group relating to an
RBTT Acquisition Proposal or the Principal Shareholder’s,
Director’s or Executive Officer’s RBTT Ordinary Shares
or RBTT Options, as applicable; and
•
not exercise any rights of dissent in connection with the
Amalgamation and the RBTT Amalgamation Resolution.
The above terms represent all the salient terms of the Voting
Agreements.
RBTT has in the past set for itself a strategic objective of
fully exploring possible combinations, acquisitions and other
alliances having the potential of maximizing value for the
benefit of its stakeholders. This objective was given more
structure and substance with the appointment of Credit Suisse on
July 22, 2004, with the mandate to explore potential
strategic opportunities between RBTT and other acceptable
regional or global financial companies, to participate in the
discussions arising therefrom and to advise generally in this
regard. As a result, several discussions were held with a number
of regional and global entities in the financial services sector
with a view towards identifying potential opportunities.
In September 2006, after giving consideration to the future
strategic direction of RBTT in the context of the emerging
trends in the financial services sector, the Directors
determined that a partnership with a global financial services
entity was crucial to the objective of maximization and
enhancement of value for all stakeholders of RBTT.
The Directors, in coming to this position, were influenced by
the consideration of the following factors:
•
industry trends towards consolidation in an increasingly
globalized environment in the financial services sector;
•
increased competition in regional markets from global financial
institutions with significantly more capital and other resources;
•
the emergence of more stringent regulatory requirements
governing compliance, credit and market risk;
•
the dearth of acquisition opportunities to drive growth in
regional and other markets that were within the capacity of RBTT
to execute;
•
difficulties in accessing human resources with the necessary
skills and expertise to satisfy a growing demand for specialist
skills in the financial services sector;
•
capital limitations which prevent RBTT’s participation in
oil and gas and other key areas of economic activity in regional
markets; and
•
limitations of the regional capital markets as a means for
sourcing capital to support growth, and the challenges,
including high costs, for regional companies in accessing
capital in international markets.
The Directors also agreed that the most acceptable option
available to RBTT was a combination or partnership with a global
entity in the financial services sector that possessed the size
and scale necessary to address the challenges and limitations
referred to above. Further, it was imperative that the party
with whom a combination or partnership was to be considered
should manifest the fullest compatibility with RBTT in terms of
complementarities and synergies and RBTT’s corporate values
and outlook.
In order to maintain the integrity of the strategic process and
ensure that it conformed to best practices, the Special
Committee was constituted, and consisted of five Directors (none
of whom was an Executive Director), including a Chairman
selected by the members of the Special Committee. The members of
the Special Committee were Gaston S. Aguilera (Chairman), John
P. Andrews, Garth Chatoor, Peter J. July and Brian Young. The
Special Committee was mandated, amongst other things, with the
consideration and evaluation of proposals regarding any
potential strategic transaction. To assist the Special Committee
in the execution of its mandate, the legal services of
(i) the Toronto, Canada based law firm of Stikeman Elliott
LLP and (ii) local counsel in the person of
Ms. Jo-Anne Julien of M.G. Daly & Partners in
Trinidad and Tobago were retained. With respect to financial
advisory services, the Special Committee retained the services
of Credit Suisse, and in addition, appointed Merrill Lynch to
deliver an independent secondary fairness opinion with regards
to a potential strategic transaction.
4.2
Other
Proposals
By November 2006, RBTT had received non-binding letters of
interest regarding potential transactions from two global
financial institutions, neither of which was RBC. Due diligence
and discussions surrounding a possible transaction with these
parties were commenced and, in the case of one party, continued
until February, 2007, while in the case of the other party,
continued until June, 2007. Non-binding proposals were made by
each of the two parties during the time periods referred to
above, and in each case, the Directors, in consultation with the
Special Committee and its legal and financial advisors,
considered these proposals. In connection with these non-binding
proposals, the Special Committee and the Directors received,
(i) several presentations from RBTT management on the due
diligence investigations of these parties,
(ii) presentations from Credit Suisse on the financial
aspects of these non-binding proposals, and (iii) advice
from their local and foreign legal advisors regarding these
non-binding proposals. After extensive deliberation and
consultation, the Special Committee and the Directors determined
that these non-binding proposals did not (i) maximize value
for RBTT Shareholders or (ii) fully benefit RBTT’s
other stakeholders. These proposals were, therefore, declined.
In June 2007, RBC approached RBTT and expressed an interest in
discussing a possible combination transaction which involved the
indirect acquisition by RBC of RBTT. Following this:
•
on July 3, 2007, RBC submitted a non-binding expression of
interest in a possible combination transaction, subject to
certain terms and conditions, which included a price range for
each RBTT Ordinary Share;
•
on July 11, 2007, RBTT informed RBC that this indicative
price range for each RBTT Ordinary Share was not acceptable;
•
on July 12, 2007, RBC submitted a revised non-binding
expression of interest, subject to certain terms and conditions,
which included a revised indicative price range for each RBTT
Ordinary Share; and
•
on July 13, 2007, RBTT and RBC entered into the
Confidentiality Agreement, which contained certain customary
conditions, and which permitted the commencement of due
diligence investigations by RBC.
Throughout this process, the Directors fully consulted with and
were advised by their legal and financial advisors.
Upon substantial completion of its due diligence investigation
in August 2007, RBC submitted a revised non-binding expression
of interest in indirectly acquiring RBTT, subject to the
negotiation of legal terms and the entering into of a definitive
agreement regarding such a transaction. The Directors considered
this revised non-binding expression of interest, and, in this
regard, received preliminary advice from RBTT management and
their financial and legal advisors. The Directors instructed
RBTT management, in consultation with their legal advisors, to
(i) continue negotiation of the legal terms of a definitive
agreement relating to the proposed transaction with RBC and
(ii) provide RBC with any other materials necessary for it
to complete its due diligence investigation.
On October 1, 2007, the Directors met to review and
consider the terms of the definitive agreement relating to the
proposed transaction with RBC and to receive presentations from
Credit Suisse, Merrill Lynch, M.G. Daly & Partners,
Stikeman Elliott LLP and RBTT management. At this meeting, both
Credit Suisse and Merrill Lynch delivered oral opinions,
subsequently confirmed in writing, to the effect that the
consideration to be received by RBTT Shareholders under the
Amalgamation was fair, from a financial point of view, to RBTT
Shareholders. The Fairness Opinion of Credit Suisse is set out
in Appendix “B” and the Fairness Opinion of Merrill
Lynch is set out in Appendix “C” to the Circular. The
Directors, in consultation with their legal and financial
advisors, (i) determined that the Amalgamation was fair to
RBTT Shareholders and in the best interests of all RBTT
stakeholders, (ii) unanimously approved the terms of the
Combination Agreement and (iii) agreed to recommend that
RBTT Shareholders vote in favour of the RBTT Amalgamation
Resolution.
The Combination Agreement was executed following this meeting of
the Directors and the terms of the Amalgamation were publicly
announced in a joint press release by RBC and RBTT issued on the
following day.
4.4
Overview
of the Amalgamation
In accordance with the terms of the Combination Agreement, the
indirect acquisition by RBC of RBTT will be structured as a
statutory amalgamation under the Companies Act. Subject to the
approval of the RBTT Amalgamation Resolution and satisfaction of
the conditions set out in the Combination Agreement, at the
Effective Time on the Effective Date, the Amalgamating
Corporations will continue as one company, the Corporation.
Pursuant to the Amalgamation and certain related transactions,
the total consideration for each RBTT Ordinary Share will have a
value of approximately TT$40.00, subject to variation in certain
circumstances as described in the Circular. As described in more
detail below, for each RBTT Ordinary Share held, an RBTT
Shareholder will receive the Cash Amount (TT$24.00 or its
equivalent in U.S.$), and, after the issuance and redemption of
the Redeemable Preferred Shares, a fractional number of RBC
Common Shares equal to the Collar Exchange Ratio (based on the
U.S. Dollar Equivalent of TT$16.00).
The following table outlines, for the benefit and from the
perspective of RBTT Shareholders, a chronology of the key events
relating to the Amalgamation and related transactions:
RBTT Shareholders to deposit Election Form with Escrow Agent, if
applicable
Election Deadline (to be determined by RBTT after consultation
with RBC, but will be no later than the forty-fifth (45th) day
prior to the Closing Date, unless otherwise agreed to by the
Parties)
Section 4.13
9.
Satisfaction of all conditions to Closing (including the receipt
of Regulatory Approvals)
On or before the Closing Date
Sections 13.8, 13.9 and 13.10
10.
RBTT Shareholders surrender their certificates representing RBTT
Ordinary Shares to the Escrow Agent
Prior to the Effective Time (which will occur on or immediately
prior to the Closing Date)
Section 5.3
11.
Closing Date
Currently anticipated to occur on or before June 30, 2008
N/A
12.
RBTT Shareholders receive consideration for RBTT Ordinary Shares
The following diagrams illustrate, in chronological order,
(i) the transaction structure prior to the Closing of the
Amalgamation, (ii) the transaction structure pursuant to
the Amalgamation at the Effective Time, and (iii) the
transaction structure immediately following the completion of
the post-Closing steps in connection with the Amalgamation.
PRE-AMALGAMATION
STRUCTURE
*
Note: In addition to the ordinary shares issued to RBC Holdings
(Barbados) Ltd., RBC Holdings (Trinidad & Tobago)
Limited is authorized to issue an unlimited number of preference
shares which will be registered with the TTSEC prior to the
Closing Date.
RBC Holdings (Trinidad & Tobago) Limited and RBTT
amalgamate pursuant to the Amalgamation Agreement, with the
resulting corporation referred to herein as the
“Corporation”. On the Closing Date, the Amalgamation
Agreement will be filed with the Trinidad and Tobago corporate
authorities, who will issue a Certificate of Amalgamation. At
the Effective Time of the Amalgamation, the following occurs:
•
The ordinary shares of RBC Holdings (Trinidad &
Tobago) Limited are converted into ordinary shares of the
Corporation.
•
The RBTT Ordinary Shares are cancelled by the Corporation as a
“put-through” on the floor of the TTSE in exchange for
the aggregate Cash Amount and Redeemable Preferred Shares of the
Corporation.
Immediately following the Amalgamation and as part of the
Closing, the Redeemable Preferred Shares are automatically
redeemed and the holders of such shares will receive, as
promptly as practicable after the Closing, RBC Common Shares.
4.7
Consideration
for RBTT Ordinary Shares
Pursuant to the Amalgamation and at the Effective Time, all RBTT
Ordinary Shares (other than the Dissenting Shares) will be
cancelled by the Corporation in exchange for a combination of
cash and Redeemable Preferred Shares as set out in the
Amalgamation Agreement. The Corporation will automatically
redeem the Redeemable Preferred Shares without any action on the
part of the holder of such Redeemable Preferred Shares, and the
Escrow Agent will subscribe for, and as soon as practicable
thereafter deliver to the holders of the Redeemable Preferred
Shares a number of RBC Common Shares, all in the manner set
forth in the Amalgamation Agreement.
Upon the completion of the Closing, an RBTT Shareholder (other
than a Dissenting Shareholder) whose RBTT share certificates
have been surrendered to the Escrow Agent will receive an amount
of cash and RBC Common Shares as described immediately below,
without any further action on the part of such RBTT Shareholder.
An RBTT Shareholder (other than a Dissenting Shareholder) will
therefore receive, as consideration for each RBTT Ordinary Share
held, the following:
1.
the Cash Amount, being TT$24.00 in cash (or, at the election of
the RBTT Shareholder in accordance with the Combination
Agreement, the U.S. Dollar Equivalent of TT$24.00); and
2.
a fractional number of RBC Common Shares equal to the Collar
Exchange Ratio, which ratio will be determined by dividing the
Unadjusted Share Amount (being the U.S. Dollar Equivalent of
TT$16.00) by a specified price as determined below.
4.8
Collar
Exchange Ratio
The Collar Exchange Ratio will be determined by dividing the
U.S. Dollar Equivalent of TT$16.00 by a specified price as set
forth below:
•
If the RBC Closing Average Share Price is between U.S.$48.980
and U.S.$59.864, then the specified price for determining the
Collar Exchange Ratio will be this RBC Closing Average Share
Price.
•
If the RBC Closing Average Share Price is equal to or greater
than U.S.$59.864, then the specified price for determining the
Collar Exchange Ratio will be deemed to be U.S.$59.864.
•
If the RBC Closing Average Share Price is less than or equal to
U.S.$48.980, then the specified price for determining the Collar
Exchange Ratio will be deemed to be U.S.$48.980.
As a result, the number of RBC Common Shares to be received by
RBTT Shareholders following the completion of the Amalgamation
is subject to a plus or minus 10% “collar” based on
the Collar Price of U.S.$54.422 (the average trading price of
RBC Common Shares on the NYSE for the five (5) consecutive
trading days ending on September 28, 2007, the last date of
trading before the execution of the Combination Agreement).
4.9
Adjustments
to Collar Exchange Ratio
The Collar Exchange Ratio will be appropriately adjusted to
reflect fully the effect of any stock split, reverse split,
stock dividend (including any dividend or distribution of
securities convertible into RBC Common Shares), reorganization,
recapitalization or other like change with respect to RBC Common
Shares occurring after the date of the Combination Agreement and
prior to the Effective Time, but not to reflect any other
dividends or distributions.
4.10
Illustration
of Effect of Collar Exchange Ratio
The following table illustrates how the Collar Exchange Ratio
would work. The table shows some hypothetical examples of the
RBC Closing Average Share Price, the corresponding Collar
Exchange Ratio using U.S. Dollar Equivalent amounts calculated
as of February 7, 2008 (using the applicable exchange rate
of 6.315 Trinidad and Tobago dollars per one U.S. dollar),
the value of the RBC Common Shares received for each RBTT
Ordinary Share, the Cash Amount received pursuant to the
Amalgamation (TT$24.00) and the total Per Share Consideration
received by RBTT Shareholders. The value of the RBC Common
Shares received for each RBTT Ordinary Share was determined by
multiplying the Collar Exchange Ratio by the hypothetical RBC
Closing Average Share Price, and then expressing this figure in
Trinidad and Tobago dollars. The total Per Share Consideration
received by RBTT Shareholders is the sum of TT$24.00 (the Cash
Amount to be received pursuant to the Amalgamation) and the
value of the RBC Common Shares received for each RBTT Ordinary
Share.
As illustrated by this table, if the RBC Closing Average Share
Price remains between U.S.$48.980 and U.S.$59.864: (i) the
value of the RBC Common Shares to be received for each RBTT
Ordinary Share following the completion of the Amalgamation will
be TT$16.00; and (ii) the Per Share Consideration will be
TT$40.00.
If the Effective Date had been February 7, 2008, the RBC
Closing Average Share Price would have been U.S.$50.605, the
Collar Exchange Ratio would have been 0.05007, the value of RBC
Common Shares received for each RBTT Ordinary Share would have
been TT$16.00 and the total Per Share Consideration received by
RBTT Shareholders pursuant to the Amalgamation would have been
TT$40.00 (with 60% of the Per Share Consideration being paid in
cash and 40% being paid in RBC Common Shares).
4.11
Sources
of Funding
The (i) aggregate cash consideration payable for the RBTT
Ordinary Shares pursuant to the Amalgamation and (ii) the
aggregate amount payable by the Escrow Agent to subscribe for
RBC Common Shares pursuant to the Redemption will each be
funded, directly or indirectly, by RBC entirely from its
existing cash reserves. Additional financial data relating to
RBC, including, among other things, RBC’s cash position, is
contained in RBC’s audited consolidated financial
statements and accompanying management’s discussion and
analysis for the year ended October 31, 2007, which are
attached as Appendix “G” to the Circular.
RBC’s obligations under the Combination Agreement are not
subject to any financing conditions.
4.12
RBC
Common Shares
The RBC Common Shares to be issued by RBC to RBTT Shareholders
following the completion of the Amalgamation will be new RBC
Common Shares issued from treasury. These RBC Common Shares will
be (i) duly and validly issued as fully paid,
non-assessable and freely-tradeable (subject to certain
restrictions set forth in the Circular) shares in the capital of
RBC and (ii) have been issued in compliance with all
applicable Laws including applicable securities Laws.
4.13
Currency
Election
Pursuant to the terms of the Combination Agreement, an RBTT
Shareholder will be entitled to make an election to receive the
U.S. Dollar Equivalent of the Cash Amount, calculated as of the
second (2nd) Business Day prior to the Closing Date. The
Election Deadline, as specified in the Election Form, will be
established by RBTT after consultation with RBC, but in any
event will be no later than the forty-fifth (45th) day prior to
the Closing Date, unless otherwise agreed to by the Parties. If
a holder of RBTT Ordinary Shares has not deposited the Election
Form with the Escrow Agent by the Election Deadline, such holder
shall be deemed not to have elected to receive the U.S. Dollar
Equivalent of the Cash Amount.
RBTT will mail to RBTT Shareholders, at least 21 days prior
to the Election Deadline, an Election Form. The Election Form,
when properly completed, will enable the RBTT Shareholder to
make an election to receive the U.S. Dollar Equivalent of the
Cash Amount. In order to make a valid election, the Election
Form must be received by the Escrow Agent by the Election
Deadline set forth in the Election Form. The Election Form will
contain complete instructions on how to make the election.
4.14
Foreign
Exchange Rate for Conversion
The U.S. Dollar Equivalent of (i) TT$24.00, to be
calculated in the event that an RBTT Shareholder elects to
convert the Cash Amount to U.S. dollars, and (ii) TT$16.00,
being the Unadjusted Share Amount, will be calculated by
multiplying such TT$ amounts by the average of the volume
weighted average of the buying and selling rates published by
the Central Bank of Trinidad and Tobago for the five
(5) consecutive trading day period ending on the second
(2nd) Business Day immediately preceding the Effective Date.
Pursuant to the Amalgamation and at the Effective Time, the
following shall occur:
(a)
each issued and outstanding RBTT Ordinary Share that is not held
by a Dissenting Shareholder will be cancelled by the Corporation
as a “put-through” on the floor of the TTSE in
consideration of a combination of:
(i)
cash in an amount equal to the Cash Amount in TT$, or U.S.$ if
duly so elected by the holder of such RBTT Ordinary Share in
accordance with the Combination Agreement; and
Redeemable Preferred Shares equal to the Collar Exchange Ratio,
which ratio will be determined by dividing the Unadjusted Share
Amount (being the U.S. Dollar Equivalent of TT$16.00) by a
specified price as determined above;
(b)
each issued and outstanding ordinary share of RBC Holdings
(Trinidad & Tobago) will be converted into ordinary
shares in the capital of the Corporation pursuant to the
provisions of Section 221(c) of the Companies Act and the sole
shareholder of RBC Holdings (Trinidad & Tobago) (being
an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of RBC), upon surrendering
its share certificates to the Corporation for cancellation, will
receive one fully paid up ordinary share in the capital of the
Corporation for every one ordinary share held by such
shareholder in the capital of RBC Holdings (Trinidad &
Tobago) prior to the Amalgamation; and
(c)
each issued and outstanding RBTT Ordinary Share that is held by
a Dissenting Shareholder will be cancelled by the Corporation as
a “put-through” on the floor of the TTSE and each such
Dissenting Shareholder will be entitled to be paid the fair
value of its RBTT Ordinary Shares in accordance with the
Companies Act.
5.2
Redemption
of Redeemable Preferred Shares
Pursuant to the applicable terms of the Redeemable Preferred
Shares of the Corporation, the Corporation will automatically
redeem the Redeemable Preferred Shares at the
Redemption Time without any action on the part of the
holder of such Redeemable Preferred Shares for an amount per
share equal to the Redemption Price.
Pursuant to the Redemption:
1.
the Corporation will deliver the aggregate
Redemption Amount to the Escrow Agent; and
2.
the Escrow Agent will use the aggregate Redemption Amount
to subscribe for, and deliver to the holders of the Redeemable
Preferred Shares, the number of RBC Common Shares that is equal
to the number of Redeemable Preferred Shares that are the
subject of the Redemption.
Holders of Redeemable Preferred Shares shall have no entitlement
to use the cash distributed to the Escrow Agent on the
Redemption for any purpose other than to subscribe for RBC
Common Shares.
The Amalgamation and related transactions (including the
issuance and subsequent redemption of the Redeemable Preferred
Shares) have been structured in the manner described herein to
meet a variety of objectives including: (i) to comply with
the Bank Act which prevents a subsidiary of RBC from holding RBC
Common Shares, (ii) to comply with certain regulatory
requirements under the FIA, and (iii) to qualify as an
amalgamation for purposes of applicable corporate and tax laws.
In the event that RBC reasonably determines that any issuance to
any Person of Redeemable Preferred Shares, or RBC Common Shares
upon Redemption, is in contravention of any applicable law,
then, in lieu of any issuance of Redeemable Preferred Shares or
RBC Common Shares, as applicable, to such Person, the
Corporation will pay such Person a cash amount per Redeemable
Preferred Share or RBC Common Share, as applicable, equal to the
RBC Closing Average Share Price.
The Corporation will cause the share register maintained for the
Redeemable Preferred Shares to be updated to reflect the
issuance of the Redeemable Preferred Shares at the Effective
Time pursuant to the Amalgamation to the former holders of RBTT
Ordinary Shares in accordance with the terms of the Amalgamation
Agreement. No certificates representing the Redeemable Preferred
Shares will be issued.
5.3
Procedure
for Exchange of RBTT Ordinary Share Certificates
At or before the Effective Time, the Corporation shall have
deposited, or shall have caused to be deposited, with the Escrow
Agent in trust for the former RBTT Shareholders:
•
the Aggregate Cash Consideration in TT$ or U.S.$, as applicable,
in accordance with the duly completed elections made by the
former RBTT Shareholders in accordance with the applicable
provisions of the Combination Agreement; and
•
the RBC Subscription Proceeds, being the cash amount in U.S.
dollars that is equal to the product of (i) the number of
Redeemable Preferred Shares issued or to be issued pursuant to
the Amalgamation, and (ii) the RBC Closing Average Share
Price.
The Escrow Agent will use the RBC Subscription Proceeds only to
subscribe, on behalf of the holders of the Redeemable Preferred
Shares, for the RBC Common Shares that are issuable upon
Redemption.
No fractional Redeemable Preferred Shares will be issued and no
dividend, stock split or other change in the capital structure
of the Corporation will relate to any such fractional security
and such fractional interests shall not entitle the owner
thereof to exercise any rights as a securityholder of the
Corporation. Each holder otherwise entitled to a fractional
interest in a Redeemable Preferred Share will be entitled to
receive (a) a number of Redeemable Preferred Shares
determined by multiplying the number of RBTT Ordinary Shares
held by such holder by the Collar Exchange Ratio (such product
to be rounded down to the nearest whole number) and (b) in
lieu of any remaining fractional Redeemable Preferred Shares, a
cash payment from the Escrow Agent equal to the product of such
fractional interest and the RBC Closing Average Share Price,
such amount to be provided to the Escrow Agent by the
Corporation upon request. If more than one certificate formerly
representing RBTT Ordinary Shares are surrendered for the
account of the same holder, the number of Redeemable Preferred
Shares for which such certificates have been surrendered shall
be computed on the basis of the aggregate number of RBTT
Ordinary Shares represented by the certificates so surrendered.
RBTT Shareholders are required to surrender to the Escrow Agent,
for cancellation, on behalf of the Corporation, the certificate
or certificates which prior to the Effective Time represented
RBTT Ordinary Shares, together with such other documents and
instruments as the Escrow Agent may reasonably require from a
former RBTT Shareholder, or any documents that the Escrow Agent
may reasonably require in the case of any RBTT Ordinary Shares
held in a depository. This will allow the Escrow Agent to
deliver to such former RBTT Shareholder (or in the case of any
RBTT Ordinary Shares held in a depository to deliver to such
depository, or cause to be delivered pursuant to existing
arrangements, as may be applicable, between such former RBTT
Shareholder and the depository, or such other arrangements as
agreed to by RBTT and RBC, each acting reasonably):
•
the amount of cash in TT$ or U.S.$ to which such holder is
entitled to receive pursuant to the terms of the Amalgamation
Agreement (including, if applicable, a cash payment in lieu of
any fractional Redeemable Preferred Shares); and
•
certificates representing the RBC Common Shares to which such
holder is entitled to receive upon the Redemption of the
Redeemable Preferred Shares issued to such holder pursuant to
the terms of the Amalgamation Agreement (together with, if
applicable, the amount of any dividends on the RBC Common Shares
forming part of the Redemption Price, as described below).
From and after the Effective Time, (i) the certificates
representing the RBTT Ordinary Shares will cease to represent
RBTT Ordinary Shares and the holders thereof will not be
entitled to exercise any of the rights of holders of RBTT
Ordinary Shares in respect thereof; and (ii) such share
certificates will represent the right of the holder thereof to
receive the cash and the RBC Common Shares to which the holder
is entitled pursuant to the provisions of the Amalgamation
Agreement, upon completion of the Amalgamation and Redemption.
With respect to any RBC Common Shares delivered to the holders
of the Redeemable Preferred Shares upon Redemption, such holders
shall for all purposes, including for determining holders of RBC
Common Shares entitled to receive dividends, be deemed the
record holders thereof from and after the Effective Date.
No dividends or other distributions paid, declared or made with
respect to RBC Common Shares, with a record date after the
Effective Date, will be paid to the holder of any unsurrendered
certificate which immediately prior to the Effective Time
represented outstanding RBTT Ordinary Shares that were exchanged
for Redeemable Preferred Shares and redeemed for RBC Common
Shares unless the holder of such certificate complies with the
procedures outlined herein. Subject to applicable law, at the
time such holder has complied with the procedures outlined
herein, (or, in the case of item (ii) of this paragraph,
below, at the appropriate payment date), there will be paid to
the holder of the certificates formerly representing RBTT
Ordinary Shares, without interest, (i) the amount of
dividends or other distributions with a record date after the
Effective Date theretofore paid with respect to the RBC Common
Shares to which such holder is entitled and (ii) on the
appropriate payment date, the amount of dividends or other
distributions with (A) a record date after the Effective
Date but prior to the date of compliance by such holder with the
procedures outlined herein, and (B) a payment date
subsequent to the date of such compliance and payable with
respect to such RBC Common Shares.
The determination by the Escrow Agent of all calculations
required to be made in accordance with the procedures outlined
herein, following discussions with RBTT and RBC, will be final
and binding on all Parties, absent manifest error.
In the event any certificate which immediately prior to the
Effective Time represented one or more outstanding RBTT Ordinary
Shares that were cancelled pursuant to the provisions of the
Amalgamation Agreement shall have been lost, stolen or
destroyed, upon the making of an affidavit of that fact by the
holder of RBTT Ordinary Shares claiming such certificate to be
lost, stolen or destroyed, the Escrow Agent will facilitate the
issuance of, in exchange for the RBTT
Ordinary Shares represented by such lost, stolen or destroyed
certificate, the consideration payable in connection with the
Amalgamation for the cancellation of such RBTT Ordinary Shares
(and any dividends or distributions with respect thereto) in
each case deliverable in accordance with the provisions set
forth herein. When authorizing such payment in exchange for any
lost, stolen or destroyed certificate, the holder to whom cash
and/or certificates representing RBC Common Shares are to be
issued shall, as a condition precedent to the issuance thereof,
indemnify RBTT and RBC in a manner satisfactory to RBTT and RBC
against any claim that may be made against RBTT and RBC with
respect to the certificate alleged to have been lost, stolen or
destroyed. Where a certificate for RBTT Ordinary Shares has been
destroyed, lost or stolen, the registered holder of that
certificate should immediately contact the Escrow Agent at
Albion Plaza,
Port-of-Spain,
Trinidad and Tobago (1
(868) 625-7288)
regarding the issuance of a replacement certificate upon the
holder satisfying the requirements of RBTT relating to
replacement certificates.
Any RBC Common Shares, together with any funds held by the
Escrow Agent, that remain undistributed to former holders of
RBTT Ordinary Shares twelve (12) months after the Effective
Time will be delivered to the Corporation or its designee, upon
demand therefor, and holders of certificates previously
representing RBTT Ordinary Shares who have not theretofore
complied with the procedures outlined herein can thereafter look
only to the Corporation or its designee for payment of any claim
to cash, RBC Common Shares, cash in lieu of fractional shares
thereof or dividends or distributions, if any, in respect
thereof.
A cheque in the amount payable to the former RBTT Shareholder
and certificates representing the appropriate number of RBC
Common Shares issuable to a former RBTT Shareholder who has
complied with the procedures outlined herein, together with a
cheque in the amount, if any, payable in lieu of fractional
Redeemable Preferred Shares will, as soon as practicable after
the Effective Date (i) be forwarded to the holder at the
address of such holder as shown on the share register maintained
by RBTT as at the Effective Time, or (ii) be made available
at the offices of the Escrow Agent for pick up by the holder or
by any other person duly authorized by the holder.
RBTT Shareholders will receive further instructions regarding
the procedures for the exchange of their share certificates in
advance of the Closing Date.
RBTT Shareholders may choose to hold RBC Common Shares received
in connection with the Amalgamation, or to sell such shares in
the open market. In the event that RBTT Shareholders wish to
sell such shares, RBTT, through its wholly-owned stockbroking
subsidiary, West Indies Stockbrokers Limited, will facilitate
trading in RBC Common Shares in order to permit such sales on a
real-time basis, thereby providing liquidity to RBTT
Shareholders. Further details regarding these matters will be
communicated at a later date. Other stockbrokers, operating in
Trinidad and Tobago and in other regional markets, may also
offer similar services.
6.2
Depository
Receipt Structure
RBC has committed to the creation of a depository receipt
structure, subject to the factors below, in which units
denominated in TT$ and issued under a deposit agreement
representing RBC Common Shares would be listed on the TTSE. It
is contemplated that the number of RBC Common Shares
representing the deposit agreement will be equal to the number
of RBC Common Shares to be issued following the completion of
the Amalgamation. Under the depositary receipt structure, an
RBTT Shareholder holding RBC Common Shares issued following the
completion of the Amalgamation may be permitted to exchange such
shares for units in the depository receipt structure at a later
date. The creation of a depository receipt structure by RBC is
subject to a number of factors including market demand,
regulatory approvals and tax considerations. A depository
receipt structure would facilitate and support the trading of
RBC Common Shares on TTSE by rendering accessible a security
representing fractions of an RBC Common Share to small investors.
The Directors have determined that the Amalgamation is fair to
RBTT Shareholders and in the best interests of all RBTT
stakeholders. The Directors have arrived at this conclusion
after consideration and evaluation of a number of factors
which the Directors have considered relevant. In this respect,
the Directors have received, considered and relied on the advice
and opinions of RBTT’s legal and financial advisors.
In the applicable sections of the Circular, the material factors
relevant to the Amalgamation considered and evaluated by the
Directors are outlined. While the Directors believe that they
have considered and evaluated all material relevant factors, the
factors considered, evaluated and discussed are not represented
as an exhaustive list of such factors or an exhaustive
discussion thereon. After due deliberation, the Directors
concluded that the potential positive factors relating to the
Amalgamation significantly outweighed the potential negative
factors. At a meeting of the Directors held on October 1,2007, the Directors (i) determined that the Amalgamation
was fair to RBTT Shareholders and in the best interests of all
RBTT stakeholders, (ii) unanimously approved the terms of
the Combination Agreement, and (iii) recommended that RBTT
Shareholders vote in favour of the RBTT Amalgamation Resolution.
As of the date of the Circular, the Directors recommend that
RBTT Shareholders vote in favour of the RBTT Amalgamation
Resolution.
The Directors have determined that the Amalgamation is fair to
RBTT Shareholders and in the best interests of all RBTT
stakeholders. Factors which the Directors considered and
evaluated as positive, in favour of and supportive of the
Amalgamation are as follows:
•
the Directors’ conclusion, after a thorough review and
after receiving the advice of their legal and financial
advisors, that the value offered to RBTT Shareholders under the
Amalgamation is more favourable to RBTT Shareholders than the
potential value that might have resulted from other strategic
alternatives reasonably available to RBTT in the absence of the
Amalgamation, including operating RBTT as it has in the recent
past, possible alternative business combinations or strategic
transactions with certain other third parties, and internal
growth scenarios, and taking into consideration the potential
rewards, risks and uncertainties associated with those other
alternatives;
•
the consideration offered under the Amalgamation represents an
attractive earnings multiple of 14.4 times RBTT’s last
twelve months earnings as at June 30, 2007 and 3.1 times
book value;
•
the Per Share Consideration offered under the Amalgamation, on
the last trading day prior to the date of the Combination
Agreement, represented a premium of 18% over the closing price
of the RBTT Ordinary Shares reported on the TTSE on that date
and a 27% premium to the average share price of RBTT Ordinary
Shares on the TTSE for the 12 month period prior to that
date;
•
approximately 60% of the Per Share Consideration is payable in
cash, providing certainty of value for the RBTT Shareholder, and
the RBTT Shareholder may elect to receive the U.S. Dollar
Equivalent of the Cash Amount;
•
approximately 40% of the Per Share Consideration is payable in
RBC Common Shares, thus giving the RBTT Shareholders an
investment security and ownership participation in the largest
bank in Canada, both in terms of assets and market
capitalization, and one of the largest in North America;
•
the RBTT Shareholder will benefit by having the opportunity to
improve significantly the liquidity of his investment as RBC
Common Shares are widely traded on both the TSX and NYSE. The
combined average daily trading volume of RBC Common Shares on
both exchanges over the
90-day
period prior to October 1, 2007 was in excess of
3.4 million shares;
•
the Collar Exchange Ratio allows the RBTT Shareholder to
potentially receive more than TT$40.00 per RBTT Ordinary Share
in value if the price of RBC Common Shares is above U.S.$59.864
on the Effective Date;
•
over the
12-month
period ended September 26, 2007 the RBC Common Share market
price appreciated by 23%. This compared favourably with the
Canadian Bank Index, which appreciated by 19.1%, and the BKX
Bank Index (comprised of major U.S. financial institutions),
which declined by 6.5% (although RBTT Shareholders should note
that historic price performance may not be an indicator of
future performance);
•
the terms of the Combination Agreement as reviewed by the
Directors, including the fact that RBTT’s and RBC’s
respective representations, warranties and covenants, and the
conditions to their respective obligations, are reasonable in
the judgment of the Directors following consultations with their
advisors, and were the product of extensive negotiations between
RBTT and its advisors and RBC and its advisors;
RBTT’s ability, under the Combination Agreement, under
certain circumstances, to consider and respond to an RBTT
Acquisition Proposal, and if the Directors determine in good
faith after consultation with their financial advisors and
outside legal counsel that such RBTT Acquisition Proposal is an
RBTT Superior Proposal, and RBC chooses not to propose
improvements to the Combination Agreement to make the original
Combination Agreement match such RBTT Acquisition Proposal,
RBTT’s ability to terminate the Combination Agreement and
accept the RBTT Superior Proposal upon making a termination
payment, and the Directors’ judgment that such termination
payment is reasonable in the context of break-up fees that have
been negotiated in other transactions and would not preclude
another party from making an RBTT Acquisition Proposal;
•
the fact that three-quarters of the votes cast at the RBTT
Meeting must approve the RBTT Amalgamation Resolution, such that
RBTT Shareholders are free to reject the RBTT Amalgamation
Resolution if desired, and the fact that if a higher offer is
made to RBTT Shareholders prior to the RBTT Meeting, RBTT
Shareholders are free to support such a higher offer and vote
against the RBTT Amalgamation Resolution;
•
the ability of RBTT Shareholders to exercise Dissent Rights;
•
Credit Suisse and Merrill Lynch each provided Fairness Opinions
to the effect that the consideration to be received by RBTT
Shareholders under the Amalgamation was fair, from a financial
point of view, to RBTT Shareholders;
•
the fact that RBC has committed to the possibility of issuing
depository receipts represented by RBC Common Shares on the
TTSE, as further described and subject to the factors set forth
in section 6.2 above, with a view to boosting the market
capitalization of regional stock exchanges and offering local
investors a security that represents a fraction of an RBC Common
Share, thus making ownership more accessible to a wider range of
investors;
•
the Amalgamation will create a significantly larger organization
with expanded market coverage, increased lending capacity and an
expanded range of products. Further, the complementary nature of
the respective customer bases and geographic markets of RBTT and
RBC could be expected to result in opportunities to obtain
synergies as financial services and products are cross-marketed
and distributed over broader customer bases and best practices
are compared and applied across businesses;
•
the absence of significant overlap of the respective branch
networks of RBTT and RBC enhances the prospect that the combined
operations will present continued opportunity for the technical
and operating expertise of RBTT Employees, who will have the
benefit of continued employment with a larger, financially
stronger company offering enhanced opportunities for development
and career aspirations; and
•
the strength of the combination of RBTT’s local management
depth and expertise pooled with RBC’s position as a leading
global financial institution will significantly enhance
capability and market standing in the broader Caribbean region.
8.2
RBC’s
Reasons for the Amalgamation
RBC is committed to long-term growth through combinations with
organizations that make sense strategically, culturally and
financially. The proposed combination of RBTT and RBC represents
a strategic and transformational acquisition for RBC in the
Caribbean, a market in which RBC has had a long history dating
back more than 100 years. Upon the completion of the
Amalgamation, an RBTT/RBC combination would expand RBC’s
retail banking footprint in the Caribbean, making it the second
largest retail bank in the English-speaking Caribbean (up from
4th place) and the region’s fourth largest retail bank
overall (up from 11th place). In addition, RBC’s combined
Caribbean operations will have presence in 18 countries and
territories (up from 9) following the completion of the
Amalgamation.
RBC believes that RBTT is a perfect complement to RBC’s
Caribbean retail operations with no significant overlap of the
respective branch networks of RBTT and RBC. In addition, the
proposed Amalgamation creates the opportunity for RBC to build a
much larger company capable of serving a bigger and more diverse
segment of the Caribbean marketplace with a broader product
offering and service capability. Customers and employees of the
larger company should benefit from enhanced service and greater
opportunities. Customers will also benefit from access to a
broad and extensive network of ATMs and branches to meet their
needs.
In addition, as evidence of Trinidad and Tobago’s
importance to RBC and its future, RBC intends to combine its
current retail banking operations in the Caribbean with
RBTT’s operations. As a consequence, the headquarters of
RBC’s Caribbean retail banking operations will be located
in
Port-of-Spain,
setting the stage for Trinidad and Tobago to become
RBC’s financial centre in the Caribbean. RBC believes that
the resulting potential influx of cash, resources and expertise
from an RBTT/RBC combination would be of significant benefit to
the broader Caribbean region thereby creating a platform that is
ideal for future expansion and growth in the Caribbean and
beyond.
Furthermore, by virtue of the strength of the Trinidad and
Tobago marketplace, RBC has, subject to a number of conditions
set forth in section 6.2 of the Circular, committed to the
creation of a depositary receipt structure. This structure would
facilitate and support the liquidity of RBC Common Shares on the
TTSE through depositary receipts and demonstrate RBC’s
commitment to the country’s capital markets by giving local
investors the opportunity to invest in RBC, one of North
America’s leading diversified financial services companies.
Certain potential risk factors should be considered by RBTT
Shareholders in evaluating the Amalgamation and in coming to a
determination of whether or not they will vote in favour of the
RBTT Amalgamation Resolution at the RBTT Meeting. These factors
were considered and evaluated by the Directors in their decision
to recommend the RBTT Amalgamation Resolution to RBTT
Shareholders.
Factors which the Directors considered and evaluated as
possessing potential risks to the Amalgamation are as follows:
•
in the event that the RBC Closing Average Share Price is less
than U.S.$48.980 or greater than U.S.$59.864, the value of the
RBC Common Shares to be received for each RBTT Ordinary Share
under the Amalgamation will not remain constant at TT$16.00, but
will vary below or above this amount, as the case may be.
Therefore, at the time RBTT Shareholders vote on the
Amalgamation, they will not be able to determine the exact value
of RBC Common Shares they will receive following the completion
of the Amalgamation. Furthermore, in the event that the RBC
Closing Average Share Price should fall below U.S.$48.980, RBTT
Shareholders will be exposed to a decrease in the value of the
non-cash consideration they will receive under the Amalgamation;
•
the failure to meet certain conditions of Closing, including,
among other things, (i) the obtaining of certain Regulatory
Approvals on terms acceptable to RBC and (ii) the Third
Party Consents, would give RBC the right to terminate the
Combination Agreement;
•
under the Combination Agreement, RBTT is subject to customary
ordinary course of business covenants, which require RBTT to
obtain the prior consent of RBC (not to be unreasonably withheld
or delayed) prior to taking certain actions. As a consequence,
RBTT could potentially experience a delay in pursuing business
opportunities that may arise in the near term;
•
under the Combination Agreement, RBTT is restricted in its
ability to solicit other RBTT Acquisition Proposals;
•
in the Combination Agreement, RBTT has agreed to pay a
termination payment of approximately TT$343.8 million
(representing approximately 2.5% of the aggregate consideration
payable by RBC to RBTT Shareholders under the Amalgamation) to
RBC in the circumstances described in the Circular. This
termination payment may discourage other companies from trying
to acquire RBTT Ordinary Shares even if those companies might be
willing to offer greater value to RBTT Shareholders than RBC has
offered in the Combination Agreement. The payment of the
aforementioned termination payment could also materially
adversely affect the financial condition of RBTT;
•
the Amalgamation will be followed by the integration of the
businesses of each of RBTT and RBC and, as such, could result in
unanticipated operational problems, expenses and liabilities and
diversion of management attention. There can be no assurance
that such integration will be successful or that the combination
will not adversely affect the business, financial condition or
operating results of RBC;
•
current and prospective RBTT employees may experience
uncertainty about their future roles within RBC/RBTT until these
roles are specifically clarified. This could potentially have an
impact on morale and adversely affect RBTT’s ability to
attract and retain key management, sales, marketing and
technical personnel;
•
if, for any reason, the Amalgamation is not completed or its
completion is materially delayed and/or the Combination
Agreement is terminated, RBTT may be subject to a number of
material risks, including the following:
•
the price of the RBTT Ordinary Shares may decline in the event
that the current market price reflects an assumption by the
market that the Amalgamation will be completed;
RBTT’s customers and strategic partners, in response to the
announcement of the Amalgamation, may delay or defer decisions
concerning RBTT until the Amalgamation is complete. Any
significant amount of cancellations, terminations, delays, or
non-renewals of arrangements with RBTT or termination of
negotiations could have a material adverse effect on the
business, results of operations, and financial condition of
RBTT, particularly in near-term quarters;
•
if the Amalgamation is terminated and the Directors determine to
seek another business combination, there can be no assurance
that RBTT will be able to find a partner willing to pay an
equivalent or more attractive price than the price to be paid by
RBC pursuant to the Amalgamation;
•
some of the Directors and Executive Officers may have interests
in the Amalgamation that are different from the interests of
RBTT Shareholders. These interests may create potential
conflicts of interest and cause some of these persons to view
the Amalgamation differently than RBTT Shareholders. Pursuant to
the terms of the Combination Agreement, certain Executive
Officers have entered into employment agreements with RBC or an
RBC Subsidiary, containing terms and conditions customary for
agreements of this type, pursuant to which such Executive
Officers were offered continuing employment after the Effective
Date;
•
there are certain restrictions on the purchase, sale and
transfer of RBC Common Shares;
•
following the completion of the Amalgamation, RBTT Shareholders
will no longer hold shares of RBTT, a Trinidad and Tobago
corporation, but shares of RBC, a Canadian Chartered Bank. There
are important differences between the rights of an RBTT
Shareholder and the rights of a holder of RBC Common Shares;
•
RBC and its subsidiaries operate globally across a broad range
of asset classes and services in which RBTT has not historically
operated. Accordingly, the results of operations of RBC and the
market price of RBC Common Shares may be affected by factors
different from those currently affecting the results of
operations of RBTT and total market price of RBTT Ordinary
Shares; and
•
RBC Common Shares may decline in price after completion of the
Amalgamation. There is no guarantee that RBTT Shareholders
receiving RBC Common Shares following completion of the
Amalgamation will be able to sell the RBC Common Shares received
for any particular price.
In the opinion of PricewaterhouseCoopers, Trinidad and Tobago
tax advisor to RBTT, the following summary describes the
principal Trinidad and Tobago income tax considerations
generally applicable to a person who acquires cash and
Redeemable Preferred Shares on the cancellation of RBTT Ordinary
Shares as part of the Amalgamation and acquires RBC Common
Shares using the proceeds from the redemption of Redeemable
Preferred Shares.
This summary is of a general nature only and is not, and is not
intended to be, legal or tax advice to any particular RBTT
Shareholder. This summary is not exhaustive of all Trinidad and
Tobago tax considerations. Accordingly, RBTT Shareholders should
consult their own tax advisors having regard to their own
particular circumstances.
The description of tax considerations set forth in this section
applies only to RBTT Shareholders that are resident, ordinarily
resident and domiciled, as applicable, in Trinidad and Tobago
for Trinidad and Tobago tax purposes. Additional rules
applicable to certain institutional investors are discussed
below under the subheading “Institutional Investors”.
Consideration
in Exchange for the RBTT Ordinary Shares
•
A stamp duty is not payable by RBTT Shareholders.
•
Unless the RBTT Shareholder is deemed to be in the business of
trading in shares, (i) any gain on the cancellation of RBTT
Ordinary Shares in exchange for cash and Redeemable Preferred
Shares and (ii) any gain on the redemption of Redeemable
Preferred Shares in exchange for RBC Common Shares, will not be
subject to income tax, corporation tax, business levy and/or
green fund levy.
RBTT Shareholders resident, ordinarily resident and domiciled in
Trinidad and Tobago will be taxed on the dividend income
received on RBC Common Shares, and will be entitled to claim a
credit for the withholding tax deducted and paid in Canada.
•
For an RBTT Shareholder who is a corporation or partnership, the
gross dividend income will also be subject to the green fund
levy at the rate of 0.1%.
•
The business levy at the rate of 0.2% may be applicable in
certain circumstances to dividend income received on RBC Common
Shares.
Sale
of RBC Common Shares
•
Gains arising from the disposal of RBC Common Shares
(a) within Trinidad and Tobago, (b) outside Trinidad
and Tobago after 12 months from acquisition, or (c) by
any person not trading in shares, will not be subject to
taxation in Trinidad and Tobago.
•
Gains arising from the disposal of RBC Common Shares outside of
Trinidad and Tobago within 12 months from acquisition will
be subject to taxation in Trinidad and Tobago.
•
The value added tax does not apply.
Institutional
Investors
RBTT Shareholders who may be legally constituted in Trinidad and
Tobago as pension funds or mutual funds, as a general rule,
enjoy tax relief either under the respective legislation by
which they were constituted or under the Corporation Tax Act.
Accordingly, they will not be liable for corporation tax and the
business levy in Trinidad and Tobago on:
•
gains from the cancellation of RBTT Ordinary Shares pursuant to
the Amalgamation;
•
gains from the redemption of the Redeemable Preferred Shares;
•
dividends received on the RBC Common Shares; and
•
gains from the sale of RBC Common Shares.
However, institutional investors may be subject to the green
fund levy on the dividends and gains arising from the RBC Common
Shares.
10.2
Material
Canadian Federal Income Tax Considerations
In the opinion of Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt LLP,
Canadian counsel to RBC, the following summary describes the
principal Canadian federal income tax considerations generally
applicable to a person who acquires cash and Redeemable
Preferred Shares on the cancellation of RBTT Ordinary Shares as
part of the Amalgamation, acquires RBC Common Shares using the
proceeds from the redemption of Redeemable Preferred Shares, and
who, at all relevant times, for purposes of the application of
the Income Tax Act (Canada) and the Income Tax Regulations
(collectively, the “Tax Act”), (1) deals
at arm’s length with RBC; (2) is not affiliated with
RBC; (3) is not, and is not deemed to be, resident in
Canada; and (4) does not use or hold RBC Common Shares,
Redeemable Preferred Shares, or RBTT Ordinary Shares in a
business carried on in Canada (a “Non-Resident
Holder”). Special rules, which are not discussed in
this summary, may apply to certain holders that are insurers
carrying on an insurance business in Canada and elsewhere.
This summary is based on the current provisions of the Tax Act,
and on counsel’s understanding of the current
administrative and assessing practices and policies of the
Canada Revenue Agency (“CRA”) published in
writing prior to the date hereof. This summary takes into
account all specific proposals to amend the Tax Act publicly
announced by or on behalf of the Minister of Finance (Canada)
prior to the date hereof (the “Proposed
Amendments”) and assumes that all Proposed Amendments
will be enacted in the form proposed. However, no assurances can
be given that the Proposed Amendments will be enacted as
proposed, or at all. This summary does not otherwise take into
account or anticipate any changes in law or administrative or
assessing practice whether by legislative, regulatory,
administrative or judicial action, nor does it take into account
tax legislation or considerations of any province, territory or
foreign jurisdiction, which may be different from those
discussed herein.
This summary is of a general nature only and is not, and is not
intended to be, legal or tax advice to any particular
Non-Resident Holder. This summary is not exhaustive of all
Canadian federal income tax considerations. Accordingly,
Non-Resident Holders should consult their own tax advisors
having regard to their own particular circumstances.
For the purposes of the Tax Act, all amounts relating to the
acquisition, holding or disposition of RBC Common Shares must be
converted into Canadian dollars based on the prevailing exchange
rates at the relevant times (or possibly at the Bank of Canada
noon-exchange rate on the relevant date). The amount of any
dividends required to be included in the income of a
Non-Resident Holder may be affected by fluctuations in the
Canadian / U.S. dollar exchange rate.
Acquisition
of Cash and Redeemable Preferred Shares on the
Amalgamation
A Non-Resident Holder will not be subject to tax under the Tax
Act on the cancellation of RBTT Ordinary Shares, or the
acquisition of Redeemable Preferred Shares and cash as part of
the Amalgamation.
Acquisition
of RBC Common Shares following Redemption of Redeemable
Preferred Shares
A Non-Resident Holder will not be subject to tax under the Tax
Act on the redemption of Redeemable Preferred Shares, or the
acquisition of RBC Common Shares with the cash proceeds from
such share redemption.
Dividends
on RBC Common Shares
Dividends paid or credited or deemed to be paid or credited to a
Non-Resident Holder on RBC Common Shares will be subject to
Canadian withholding tax at a rate of 25%, subject to a
reduction in the rate of withholding to which the Non-Resident
Holder may be entitled under an applicable tax treaty. If the
Non-Resident Holder is resident of a country that has an income
tax treaty with Canada (such as Trinidad and Tobago, Barbados,
or Jamaica), is eligible for benefits under that tax treaty, and
is the beneficial owner of the dividends, the applicable rate of
Canadian withholding tax is generally reduced under the
applicable tax treaty to 15%.
Disposing
of RBC Common Shares
A Non-Resident Holder will not be subject to tax under the Tax
Act on any capital gain realized on a disposition of RBC Common
Shares, unless the RBC Common Shares are “taxable Canadian
property” to the Non-Resident Holder for purposes of the
Tax Act.
Generally, the RBC Common Shares will not constitute taxable
Canadian property to a Non-Resident Holder at a particular time
provided that (1) the RBC Common Shares are listed on a
designated stock exchange (which includes the TSX and the NYSE)
at that time, and (2) the Non-Resident Holder, persons with
whom the Non-Resident Holder does not deal at arm’s length,
or the Non-Resident Holder together with all such persons, have
not owned or had an interest in or an option in respect of 25%
or more of the issued shares of any class or series of the
capital stock of RBC at any time during the
60-month
period that ends at that time.
RBTT entered into an engagement letter dated September 7,2007 with Credit Suisse pursuant to which, among other things,
Credit Suisse agreed to provide the Directors with its opinion
as to the fairness of the Per Share Consideration under the
Amalgamation, from a financial point of view, to the RBTT
Shareholders.
At the meeting of the Directors on October 1, 2007, Credit
Suisse made a financial presentation to the Directors and
delivered its oral opinion, subsequently confirmed by delivery
of the Fairness Opinion of Credit Suisse, to the effect that, as
of October 1, 2007, the Per Share Consideration was fair,
from a financial point of view, to the RBTT Shareholders.
The full text of Credit Suisse’s Fairness Opinion, which
sets forth, among other things, assumptions made, information
reviewed, matters considered and limitations on the scope of the
review undertaken by Credit Suisse in rendering its opinion, is
attached as Appendix “B” to the Circular. RBTT
Shareholders are urged to read Credit Suisse’s Fairness
Opinion in its entirety. The summary of Credit Suisse’s
Fairness Opinion described in the Circular is qualified in its
entirety by reference to the full text of Credit Suisse’s
Fairness Opinion.
Credit Suisse’s Fairness Opinion addresses only the
fairness of the Per Share Consideration, is for the information
of the Directors in connection with their consideration of the
proposed Amalgamation only and does not constitute a
recommendation to any RBTT Shareholder as to how such RBTT
Shareholder should vote at the RBTT Meeting.
Under its engagement letter with Credit Suisse, Credit Suisse
will receive a fee for its services, a significant portion of
which is contingent upon the consummation of the Amalgamation.
Credit Suisse will also receive a fee for rendering its Fairness
Opinion. In addition, RBTT has agreed to indemnify Credit Suisse
for certain liabilities and other items arising
out of its engagement. From time to time, Credit Suisse and its
affiliates have in the past provided, are currently providing
and in the future may provide, investment banking and other
financial services to RBTT and RBC, for which they have
received, and would expect to receive, compensation. Credit
Suisse is a full service securities firm engaged in securities
trading and brokerage activities as well as providing investment
banking and other financial services. In the ordinary course of
business, Credit Suisse and its affiliates may acquire, hold or
sell, for its and its affiliates’ own accounts and the
accounts of customers, equity, debt and other securities and
financial instruments (including bank loans and other
obligations) of RBTT, RBC and any other company that may be
involved in the Amalgamation, as well as provide investment
banking and other financial services to such entities.
11.2
Fairness
Opinion of Credit Suisse — Methods
of Analysis
In preparing its opinion to the Directors, Credit Suisse
performed a variety of financial and comparative analyses,
including those described below. The summary of the analyses
described below is not a complete description of the analyses
underlying Credit Suisse’s opinion. The preparation of a
fairness opinion is a complex process involving various
determinations as to the most appropriate and relevant methods
of financial analysis and the application of those methods to
the particular circumstances and, therefore, a fairness opinion
is not readily susceptible to partial analysis or summary
description. In arriving at its opinion, Credit Suisse made
qualitative judgments as to the significance and relevance of
each analysis and factor that it considered. Credit Suisse
arrived at its ultimate opinion based on the results of all
analyses undertaken and assessed as a whole and did not draw, in
isolation, conclusions from or with regard to any one factor or
method of analysis. Accordingly, Credit Suisse believes that its
analyses must be considered as a whole and that selecting
portions of its analyses and factors or focusing on information
presented in tabular format, without considering all analyses
and factors or the narrative descriptions of the analyses, could
create a misleading or incomplete view of the process underlying
its analyses and opinion.
The following is a summary of certain of the principal
components of the analyses performed by Credit Suisse in
connection with its opinion as to the fairness of the Per Share
Consideration under the Amalgamation, from a financial point of
view, to the RBTT Shareholders. This summary is qualified in its
entirety by reference to the full text of Credit Suisse’s
Fairness Opinion, attached to the Circular as
Appendix “B”. The financial analyses summarized
below include information presented in tabular format. In order
to fully understand Credit Suisse’s financial analysis, the
tables must be read together with the text of each summary. The
tables alone do not constitute a complete description of the
financial analyses. Considering the data in the tables below
without considering the full narrative description of the
financial analyses, including the methodologies and assumptions
underlying the analyses, could create a misleading or incomplete
view of Credit Suisse’s financial analyses.
In considering the fairness of the Per Share Consideration
offered to RBTT Shareholders under the Amalgamation, Credit
Suisse principally relied upon the following methods of
financial analysis:
1.
a comparison of the Per Share Consideration offered to RBTT
Shareholders under the Amalgamation to the results of a
discounted cash flow (“DCF”) analysis of RBTT (the
“Discounted Cash Flow Analysis” or “DCF
Analysis”);
2.
a comparison of the Per Share Consideration offered to the RBTT
Shareholders under the Amalgamation to the closing price of RBTT
Ordinary Shares over certain periods of time (the
“Implied Premium of the Per Share
Consideration”);
3.
a comparison of selected financial multiples, to the extent
publicly available, for selected companies in the banking
industry whose securities are publicly traded with the multiples
implied by the Per Share Consideration under the Amalgamation
(the “Selected Companies Analysis”); and
4.
a comparison of selected financial multiples, to the extent
publicly available, of selected precedent transactions with the
multiples implied by the Per Share Consideration offered to RBTT
Shareholders under the Amalgamation (the “Selected
Transaction Analysis”).
Discounted
Cash Flow Analysis
The Discounted Cash Flow Analysis performed by Credit Suisse
takes into account the amount, timing and relative certainty of
projected equity cash flows expected to be generated by RBTT.
The DCF approach requires that certain assumptions be made
regarding, among other things, the projected cash flows of RBTT
(the “Forecast”), the appropriate discount
rates to be applied to such cash flows (the “Discount
Rates”) and the expected value of RBTT at the end of
the
fiscal periods considered (the “Terminal
Value”). The possibility that some of the assumptions
may prove to be inaccurate is one factor involved in the
determination of the Discount Rates.
Forecast:
In performing the DCF Analysis, Credit Suisse utilized the
Forecast, which was based on the projected cash flows that each
business segment of RBTT could be expected to generate over the
fiscal years of 2008 to 2011. These projected cash flows were
based on forecasts and projections for RBTT provided by the
management of RBTT and Credit Suisse has relied on these
projections being accurate.
Discount
Rate:
Credit Suisse selected the appropriate Discount Rates, ranging
from 12.5 percent to 15.5 percent, to apply to the Forecast
by utilizing the Capital Asset Pricing Model (“CAPM”)
approach to determine an appropriate cost of equity. This
approach calculates the cost of equity based on an assumed
optimal capital structure for RBTT. The CAPM approach calculates
the cost of equity capital as a function of the risk-free rate
of return, the volatility of equity prices in relationship to a
benchmark (“beta”) and a market risk premium. Credit
Suisse then employed these Discount Rates in the
DCF Analysis.
Credit Suisse calculated the risk-free rate of return based on
the 10-year
U.S. treasury yield reported by Bloomberg on September 20,2007 (4.38 percent), plus a country risk premium. The
country risk premium was based on the weighted average
difference between the
10-year U.S.
treasury yield and comparable government securities issued in
U.S. dollars by Trinidad & Tobago, Jamaica, Barbados,
Aruba and Grenada. Credit Suisse determined the appropriate
weightings based on each country’s respective contribution
to the total earnings of RBTT during the last twelve months.
Credit Suisse calculated the beta as the weighted average of
(i) the average betas for certain merchant banks
(specifically, Bear Stearns & Co. Inc., Goldman Sachs
Group Inc., Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc., Merrill
Lynch & Co. Inc. and Morgan Stanley) and (ii) the
average betas for certain commercial banks (specifically, Banco
de Credito e Inversiones S.A., Banco de Chile, Bradesco,
Corpbanca S.A., Doral Financial Corp., First Bancorp Puerto
Rico, Grupo Financiero Banorte S.A., Grupo Inbursa S.A., Itau
Banco, Oriental Financial Group Inc., R&G Financial Corp.,
Unibanco, W Holdings Co. Inc.). Credit Suisse determined
the betas based on historical information obtained from MSCI
Barra. Credit Suisse determined the appropriate weightings based
on projections provided by the management of RBTT estimating the
percentage of RBTT’s earnings to be contributed by its
merchant bank operations during 2008.
The market risk premium was provided by Credit Suisse Financial
Strategy Group.
The table below summarizes the principal components of the CAPM
approach employed by Credit Suisse in selecting the appropriate
Discount Rates:
Risk-free Rate
6.92%
Beta
1.33
Market Risk Premium
5.12%
Terminal
Value:
Credit Suisse utilized a Terminal Value based on the projected
book value of RBTT at the end of the 2011 fiscal year, based on
forecasts and projections for RBTT provided by management of
RBTT, and applying it to book value multiples (ranging from
2.50x to 3.00x) that were derived from selected banks whose
securities are publicly traded. These selected banks are the
same banks Credit Suisse examined in its Selected Companies
Analysis, as described below.
In conducting its DCF Analysis, Credit Suisse did not rely on
any single assumption but performed a variety of sensitivity
analyses. Variables sensitized included the Discount Rate and
book value multiple for the purposes of calculating the Terminal
Value. The table below summarizes the DCF Analysis
performed by Credit Suisse.
Discount
Terminal Book Value Multiple
Rate
2.50x
2.75x
3.00x
Price Per Share (TT$)
$
35.98
$
39.05
$
42.13
12.5%
Price / LTM
EPS(1)
12.8x
13.9x
15.0x
Price Per Share (TT$)
$
34.33
$
37.25
$
40.18
14.0%
Price / LTM
EPS(1)
12.2x
13.3x
14.3x
Price Per Share (TT$)
$
32.77
$
35.56
$
38.35
15.5%
Price / LTM
EPS(1)
11.7x
12.7x
13.7x
(1)
Price as multiple of RBTT’s earnings per share during the
last twelve month period as of September 30, 2007.
As illustrated by the preceding table, the results generated
under the DCF Analysis indicated present values of RBTT Ordinary
Shares ranging from TT$32.77 to TT$42.13. Taking into account
the sensitivity analyses described above, Credit Suisse
concluded that the Per Share Consideration offered to the RBTT
Shareholders under the Amalgamation is within the range of the
results generated under the DCF Analysis.
Implied
Premium of the Per Share Consideration
Credit Suisse considered the premium implied by the Per Share
Consideration over the average closing prices of RBTT Ordinary
Shares reported on the TTSE during selected periods prior to the
execution of the Combination Agreement. Credit Suisse also
considered the premium implied by the Per Share Consideration
relative to the average closing price of RBTT Ordinary Shares
reported on the TTSE during periods prior to any speculation in
the financial markets (as evidenced by trading activity of RBTT
Ordinary Shares) that RBTT was exploring strategic alternatives.
The table below summarizes the analysis.
Implied Premium of the Per Share Consideration over the RBTT
Average
Closing Price on September 28, 2007
As illustrated by the preceding table, Credit Suisse’s
analysis of the Implied Premium of the Per Share Consideration
indicated that the Per Share Consideration represented
(i) a premium within a range of 17.6 percent to 24.9
percent over the average closing price of RBTT Ordinary Shares
during select periods ending September 28, 2007 and
(ii) a premium within a range of 14.1 percent to
41.0 percent over the average closing price of RBTT
Ordinary Shares during select periods ending November 20,2006.
Selected
Companies Analysis
In performing a Selected Companies Analysis, Credit Suisse
reviewed and compared certain financial and stock market
information relating to RBTT with the corresponding publicly
available information for the following publicly traded
companies operating in the banking industry in the Caribbean:
•
FirstCaribbean International Bank Limited (Barbados)
Scotiabank Trinidad and Tobago Limited (Trinidad and Tobago)
•
Bank of Nova Scotia Jamaica Limited (Jamaica)
•
National Commercial Bank Jamaica Limited (Jamaica)
•
Commonwealth Bank Limited (Bahamas)
For each company selected, Credit Suisse considered the closing
price of such company’s common shares on September 28,2007 (the last day of trading before the execution of the
Combination Agreement) as (i) a multiple of the earnings
per share (“EPS”) of such company during the last
twelve month (“LTM”) period, (ii) a multiple of
such company’s book value per share as of its most recent
reported accounting period and (iii) a premium over such
company’s total deposits per share as of its most recent
reported accounting period. Set forth below are the relevant
multiples derived from the selected companies.
As illustrated by the preceding table, Credit Suisse’s
analysis of the selected companies indicated (i) multiples
of closing share price to EPS ranging from 8.6x to 15.0x,
(ii) multiples of closing share price to book value per
share ranging from 1.99x to 3.58x and (iii) a premium of
closing price over deposits per share ranging from
25.2 percent to 69.5 percent. Credit Suisse then
compared these multiples to the corresponding multiples of RBTT
implied by (a) the Per Share Consideration and (b) the
closing price of RBTT reported on the TTSE on September 28,2007 (the last day of trading before the execution of the
Combination Agreement):
Price/LTM
Price/Book
Premium of Price
Earnings per
Value per
over Deposits per
Share
Share
Share
Implied multiples for RBTT based on Per Share Consideration
Credit Suisse concluded that the multiples implied by the Per
Share Consideration under the Amalgamation were within the range
of the corresponding multiples considered in the Selected
Companies Analysis. However, none of the companies considered in
the Selected Companies Analysis are identical to RBTT.
Accordingly, an evaluation of the results of the Selected
Companies Analysis involves complex considerations, many of
which are particular to the selected companies themselves.
In performing a Selected Transaction Analysis, Credit Suisse
reviewed certain publicly available information with respect to
selected transactions in the banking industry involving
Caribbean banks and Latin American banks. Such information
included, among other things, the purchase price paid or implied
by the selected transactions as a multiple of the EPS of the
non-surviving entity during the twelve months prior to the
transaction and as a multiple of the non-surviving entity’s
book value per share as of its most recent reported accounting
period. Set forth below are the relevant multiples derived from
the selected transactions.
Purchase
Purchase
Price/LTM
Price/Book
Deal Value
Earnings
Value per
Date
Acquiror
Target
(US$ millions)
per
Share(1)
Share
Latin American Transactions
07/19/07
Citibank Chile
LQIF S.A.
$
701
9.2x
1.12x
02/28/07
General Electric Co. (GE Money)
Banco Colpatria S.A.
228
13.2x
2.61x
02/27/07
Grupo Banistmo S.A. (HSBC)
Inversiones Financieras
Bancosal S.A.
191
16.0x
2.52x
02/26/07
Société Générale S.A.
Banco Cacique S.A.
408
N/A
(2)
1.31x
12/22/06
Bancolombia S.A.
Conglomerado Financiero
Internacional Banagricola S.A.
As illustrated by the preceding table, Credit Suisse’s
analysis of the selected transactions indicated
(i) multiples of purchase price to EPS ranging from 6.0x to
16.3x and (ii) multiples of purchase price to book value
per share ranging from 0.90x to 5.53x. Credit Suisse compared
these multiples with the corresponding multiples for RBTT based
on the Per Share Consideration:
Per Share
Per Share
Consideration/
Consideration
LTM Earnings
Price/Book
per Share
Value per Share
Implied Multiples for RBTT based on Per Share Consideration
14.3x
3.06x
Credit Suisse concluded that the multiples implied by the Per
Share Consideration under the Amalgamation were within the range
of the corresponding multiples considered in the Selected
Transaction Analysis. In performing a Selected Transaction
Analysis, Credit Suisse relied upon publicly available
information and upon other financial information for RBTT
provided by the management of RBTT. None of the selected
transactions considered in the Selected Transactions Analysis
are identical to the proposed Amalgamation. Accordingly, an
evaluation of the results of the Selected Transaction Analysis
involves complex considerations, many of which are particular to
the selected transactions themselves.
11.3
Fairness
Opinion of Merrill Lynch
At the meeting of the Directors on October 1, 2007, the
Directors also received an independent secondary opinion from
Merrill Lynch, which was delivered orally, and subsequently
confirmed by the delivery of the Fairness Opinion of Merrill
Lynch, to the effect that, as of October 1, 2007, the Per
Share Consideration was fair, from a financial point of view, to
the RBTT Shareholders. The full text of the Fairness Opinion of
Merrill Lynch, which sets forth, among other things, assumptions
made, information reviewed, matters considered and limitations
on the scope of the review undertaken by Merrill Lynch in
rendering its Fairness Opinion, is attached as Appendix
“C” to the Circular. RBTT Shareholders are urged to
read Merrill Lynch’s Fairness Opinion in its entirety.
RBTT Shareholders are advised that Directors and Executive
Officers may have interests in the Amalgamation different from,
or in addition to, the interests of RBTT Shareholders.
12.1
Directors
The Directors hold, in the aggregate, 2,068,168 RBTT Ordinary
Shares, representing approximately 0.60% of the RBTT Ordinary
Shares issued and outstanding as at the date of the Circular.
All of the RBTT Ordinary Shares held by the Directors will be
treated in the same manner under the Amalgamation as RBTT
Ordinary Shares held by any other RBTT Shareholder. The number
of RBTT Ordinary Shares held by each Director as at the date of
the Circular are, as follows:
Number of RBTT
Name
Ordinary Shares Held
Gaston S. Aguilera
143,011
John P. Andrews
60,000
Robert Bermudez
126,678
Garth Chatoor
49,000
Martin G. Daly
6,098
Arthur Lok Jack
700,000
Peter J. July
975,461
Gary N. Voss
7,920
Brian Young
0
Miguel Pourier
0
The Directors hold, in the aggregate, 553,801 RBTT Options,
representing approximately 13.85% of the RBTT Options issued and
outstanding as at the date of the Circular. As at the date of
the Circular, approximately 50.43% of the RBTT
Options held by the Directors are RBTT
In-The-Money
Options, and approximately 49.57% of the RBTT Options held by
the Directors are RBTT
Out-Of-The-Money
Options. All of the RBTT Options held by the Directors will be
treated in the same manner under the Amalgamation as RBTT
Options held by every other holder of RBTT Options. The
aggregate consideration payable to the Directors under the
Amalgamation in respect of their RBTT Options is approximately
TT$6.3 million, assuming that none of them exercises or
disposes of any RBTT Options prior to the Effective Date.
On October 1, 2007, each of the Directors entered into
Voting Agreements with RBTT pursuant to which each of the
Directors agreed to support the Amalgamation and the
transactions contemplated thereby.
12.2
Executive
Officers
The Executive Officers hold, in the aggregate, 261,183 RBTT
Ordinary Shares representing less than 0.08% of the RBTT
Ordinary Shares outstanding as at the date of the Circular. All
of the RBTT Ordinary Shares held by the Executive Officers will
be treated in the same manner under the Amalgamation as RBTT
Ordinary Shares held by any other RBTT Shareholder. The number
of RBTT Ordinary Shares held by each Executive Officer as at the
date of the Circular are, as follows:
Number of RBTT
Name
Ordinary Shares Held
Suresh B. Sookoo
102,900
Rodney S. Prasad
50,138
Nicole M. Richards
0
Stephen A.C. Bayne
65,769
Lyndon R.W. Guiseppi
0
David K. Hackett
0
Catherine R. Kumar
0
Calvin A. Bijou
4,208
Leroy Calliste
1,410
Ronald A. Carter
0
William P. Charles
0
Gary A. Fuller
0
Amos A. Herai
0
Krishendath Maharaj
0
James C. Mendes
22,300
Patricia M. Narayansingh
14,458
The Executive Officers hold, in the aggregate, 1,840,724 RBTT
Options, representing approximately 46.04% of the RBTT Options
outstanding as at the date of the Circular. As at the date of
the Circular, approximately 67.92% of the RBTT Options held by
the Executive Officers are RBTT
In-The-Money
Options, and approximately 32.08% of the RBTT Options held by
the Executive Officers are RBTT
Out-Of-The-Money
Options. All of the RBTT Options held by the Executive Officers
will be treated in the same manner under the Amalgamation as
RBTT Options held by every other holder of RBTT Options. The
aggregate consideration payable to the Executive Officers under
the Amalgamation in respect of their RBTT Options is
approximately TT$14.8 million, assuming none of them
exercises or disposes of any RBTT Options prior to the Effective
Date.
On October 1, 2007, each of the Executive Officers entered
into Voting Agreements with RBTT pursuant to which each of the
Executive Officers agreed to support the Amalgamation and the
transactions contemplated thereby.
Executive Officers are also generally entitled to benefits,
rights and payments under severance, incentive, retirement and
pension plans. These benefits arise as normal incidents of
employment for the Executive Officers, and are not materially
altered by the completion of the Amalgamation.
Under the terms of a Change of Control Policy of RBTT, Executive
Officers and certain other officers are eligible to receive
compensation from RBTT in the event of termination of employment
upon a change of control of RBTT.
Pursuant to the terms of the Combination Agreement, certain
Executive Officers have entered into employment agreements with
RBC or an RBC Subsidiary, containing terms and conditions
customary for agreements of this type, pursuant to which such
Executive Officers were offered continuing employment after the
Effective Date. Such offers of employment will be effective only
upon the Closing, and provide that the offers will supersede the
change of control agreements and any other agreements with
respect to each such Executive Officer’s employment with
RBTT. These Executive Officers are Suresh B. Sookoo, David K.
Hackett, Krishendath Maharaj and Calvin A. Bijou. In addition,
an employment agreement was also entered into with Mr. Andy
Jogie, Head - Centralized Investment Unit for RBTT.
12.3
Other
Officers
Other than certain Executive Officers, no other officer of RBTT
played any policy-making role in connection with the Combination
Agreement or the Amalgamation. While certain of these officers
may be entitled to certain enhanced payments in the event of any
termination or constructive dismissal following completion of
the Amalgamation under the terms of outstanding employment
agreements, the amounts payable are not material to RBTT,
individually or in the aggregate. Further, none of these
officers is or was in a position under any circumstances to
affect or influence the negotiation of the Combination Agreement
or the implementation or completion of the Amalgamation. These
officers hold in the aggregate 1,603,730 RBTT Options
representing approximately 40.11% of the RBTT Options issued and
outstanding as at the date of the Circular. As at the date of
the Circular, approximately 52.72% of the RBTT Options held by
these officers are RBTT
In-The-Money
Options, and approximately 47.28% of the RBTT Options held by
these officers are RBTT
Out-Of-The-Money
Options.
12.4
Exclusion
of a Director
Mr. Arthur Lok Jack is a Director and a director and chairman of
the board of directors of a Principal Shareholder, Guardian
Holdings Limited. As of the date of the Circular, Mr. Lok
Jack also holds 700,000 RBTT Ordinary Shares and 89,485 RBTT
Options. Mr. Lok Jack was granted formal leave of absence
by the Directors for the period from September 28, 2006 to
October 3, 2007. Prior to September 28, 2006,
Mr. Lok Jack recused himself from any discussions and
deliberations of the Directors on the subject of possible
business combinations. As a result, Mr. Lok Jack did not
participate in any discussions or deliberations of the Directors
on the Amalgamation or on any other strategic alternative
reasonably available to RBTT in the absence of the Amalgamation,
including possible alternative business combinations with
certain other third parties, so as to avoid any perceived
conflict of interest.
12.5
Exclusion
of Directors of a Principal Shareholder
Mr. Peter J. July and Mr. Gary N. Voss are directors of a
Principal Shareholder, Guardian Holdings Limited. Mr. July
and Mr. Voss each requested and was granted a formal leave
of absence by Guarding Holdings Limited for the period from
September 28, 2006 to October 3, 2007 so as to avoid
any perceived conflict of interest.
12.6
Exclusion
of Executive Officers
Only Executive Officers whose participation was deemed necessary
in the discussions with RBC were involved in the strategy and
conduct of negotiations leading up to the Combination Agreement
and the transactions contemplated thereby. All other Executive
Officers were excluded therefrom.
During the six-month period preceding the date of the Circular,
no Director or Executive Officer has purchased or sold RBTT
Ordinary Shares. Further, after reasonable inquiry, the
Directors are satisfied that no associate of a Director or
Executive Officer, no person holding more than 10% of RBTT
Ordinary Shares in issue, and no person acting jointly or in
concert with RBC, has purchased or sold RBTT Ordinary Shares
within the six-month period preceding the date of the Circular.
The details of RBTT Ordinary Shares issued to Directors and
Executive Officers during the two year period preceding the date
of the Circular are, as follows:
All RBTT Ordinary Shares issued to Directors and Executive
Officers were issued under the terms of the RBTT Option Plan and
represented the entitlement of these persons thereunder.
12.8
Indemnification
The Combination Agreement provides that all rights to
indemnification or exculpation existing as of October 1,2007 in favour of the directors or officers of RBTT or any of
the RBTT Subsidiaries as provided in its articles of
incorporation or by-laws in effect on October 1, 2007 will
survive the Amalgamation and will continue in full force and
effect for a period of not less than six (6) years from the
Effective Time, and the Corporation will assume, effective upon
consummation of the Amalgamation, all such liability with
respect to any matters arising prior to the Effective Time.
RBC has also agreed to maintain or cause to be maintained in
effect, for not less than six (6) years from the Effective
Time, coverage of no less than U.S.$15 million for each
individual covered under the policies of the directors’ and
officers’ liability insurance maintained by RBTT as of
October 1, 2007, which coverage is no less advantageous,
and with no gaps or lapses in coverage with respect to matters
occurring prior to the Effective Time, provided that in no event
shall RBC be required to expend in any one year an amount in
excess of 200% of the annual amount currently paid by RBTT, and
if the annual premiums of such insurance coverage exceed such
amount, RBC shall be obligated only to obtain a substantially
similar policy with the greatest coverage available (as to
quantum and events) for such maximum cost. Alternatively, at
RBC’s option, it may (i) substitute such insurance
policies, or (ii) purchase or cause to be purchased
“run-off” directors’
and officers’ liability insurance, provided that, in each
case, such insurance provides coverage substantially as
favourable to such directors and officers as that in effect
under such current policies to cover prior events during such
six-year period or the balance thereof.
12.9
Interest
of Directors or Executive Officers in Material Transactions or
Agreements of RBC
No Director or Executive Officer nor any associate or Affiliate
of any Director or Executive Officer has or had any material
interest, direct or indirect, in (i) any agreement,
arrangement or transaction entered into on or after
April 1, 2006 or (ii) any proposed agreement,
arrangement or transaction, which has materially affected or
would materially affect RBC.
The Combination Agreement and the Amalgamation Agreement are the
legal documents that govern the Amalgamation. This section of
the Circular describes the material provisions of the
Combination Agreement but does not purport to be complete and
may not contain all of the information about the Combination
Agreement that is important to you. This summary is qualified in
its entirety by reference to the Combination Agreement, which is
attached as Appendix “D” to the Circular. You are
encouraged to read the Combination Agreement in its entirety. It
is an agreement that establishes and governs certain legal
relationships between RBTT and RBC with respect to the
transactions described in the Circular. It is not intended to be
a source of factual, business or operational information about
RBTT or RBC.
13.1
Representations
and Warranties
In the Combination Agreement, RBTT and RBC have each made
representations and warranties for the benefit of the other
Party relating to, among other things: incorporation and
qualification; corporate authorization; no conflicts with or
breach of constating documents, RBTT or RBC Material Contracts
(as applicable), material Authorizations, or any Law; required
Authorizations; required consents; execution and binding
obligation; authorized and issued capital; public and regulatory
filings; and financial statements.
In addition to the foregoing representations and warranties, RBC
made representations and warranties for the benefit of RBTT
relating to the RBC Common Shares to be issued to RBTT
Shareholders pursuant to the Redemption; the incorporation of
RBC Holdings (Trinidad & Tobago); and sufficiency of
financial resources.
RBTT also made representations and warranties for the benefit of
RBC with respect to RBTT Subsidiaries; conduct of business in
the Ordinary Course; no RBTT Material Adverse Change since
March 31, 2007; compliance with Laws; Authorizations;
properties; RBTT Material Contracts; intellectual property;
environmental matters; RBTT Employees; RBTT Employee Plans;
insurance; litigation; Taxes; agreements with regulators;
fairness opinions; board resolutions; brokers and finders; books
and records; risk management; loans and investments; investment
management and related activities; Trust or Agency Agreements;
Trust or Agency Records; Trust or Agency standards;
non-arm’s length transactions; and banking legislation
regulatory compliance.
Certain of the representations and warranties of RBTT in the
Combination Agreement are expressly qualified by reference to an
RBTT Material Adverse Effect.
13.2
Conduct
of Business Prior to the Effective Time by RBTT
Pursuant to the terms of the Combination Agreement, RBTT is
obligated to conduct its business in accordance with certain
covenants until the Effective Time or the earlier termination of
the Combination Agreement in accordance with its terms, and may
not deviate from such covenants, except (i) with the prior
written consent of RBC to any variation therefrom, which may not
be unreasonably withheld or delayed; or (ii) as
specifically required by the Combination Agreement, the
Ancillary Agreements or the Amalgamation.
These covenants are, in some cases, subject to certain
exceptions or thresholds, and relate to, among other things: the
conduct of RBTT’s business in the Ordinary Course; the
splitting, combination or reclassification of any of the
outstanding shares of RBTT; the declaration of dividends; the
amendment of articles or by-laws of RBTT; the sale, pledge,
issuance or redemption of any shares in RBTT’s capital
stock; the granting or accelerated vesting of RBTT Options; the
amalgamation or reorganization of RBTT with any other Person;
acquisitions by RBTT of another Person or division thereof; the
sale of any material assets; RBTT Labour and Employment
Arrangements or Severance or Change of Control Plans; the
discharge or satisfaction of any Liability; maintenance of
RBTT’s current insurance; RBTT Material Contracts; a change
in accounting principles; entrance into new lines of business or
changes in risk management; the
acquisition of equity securities of RBC or any RBC Subsidiary;
the settlement of material claims or litigation; long-term
indebtedness of RBTT; underwriting or similar commitments; and
the entering into of certain agreements relating to the
foregoing matters.
RBTT has also agreed to advise RBC of: (i) any event that
would render any representation or warranty of RBTT contained in
the Combination Agreement untrue or inaccurate to the degree set
forth in the Combination Agreement; (ii) any RBTT Material
Adverse Effect; and (iii) any material breach by RBTT of
any covenant or agreement contained in the Combination Agreement.
13.3
Conduct
of Business Prior to the Effective Time by RBC
Pursuant to the terms of the Combination Agreement, RBC has also
agreed to abide by certain covenants until the Effective Time or
the earlier termination of the Combination Agreement in
accordance with its terms, and may not deviate from such
covenants, except: (i) with the prior written consent of
RBTT to any variation therefrom, which may not be unreasonably
withheld or delayed; or (ii) as specifically required by
the Combination Agreement, the Ancillary Agreements or the
Amalgamation.
These covenants are, in some cases, subject to certain
exceptions or thresholds, and relate to, among other things, the
acquisition of equity securities of RBTT or any RBTT Subsidiary
and the listing of the RBC Common Shares on the RBC Exchanges.
RBC has also agreed to advise RBTT of: (i) any event that
would render any representation or warranty of RBC contained in
the Combination Agreement untrue or inaccurate to the degree set
forth in the Combination Agreement, (ii) any RBC Material
Adverse Effect; and (iii) any material breach by RBC of any
covenant or agreement contained in the Combination Agreement.
13.4
Non-Solicitation
Covenants
Other than as set out below, RBTT has agreed not to, directly or
indirectly, through any Director, Officer, employee,
representative or agent of RBTT or any of the RBTT Subsidiaries:
(i) solicit, initiate, encourage or facilitate (including
by way of furnishing information or entering into any form of
any Contract) the initiation of any inquiries or proposals
regarding or which may reasonably be expected to lead to, an
actual or potential RBTT Acquisition Proposal;
(ii) participate in any discussions or negotiations
regarding any actual or potential RBTT Acquisition Proposal;
(iii) withdraw, modify or qualify (or publicly propose to
withdraw, modify or qualify) in a manner adverse to RBC the
approval recommendation of the Directors of the Amalgamation or
the other transactions contemplated by the Combination
Agreement; (iv) authorize, approve or recommend (or propose
publicly to authorize, approve or recommend) or remain neutral
with respect to any RBTT Acquisition Proposal; or (v) enter
into any Contract related to any RBTT Acquisition Proposal.
RBTT has agreed, and agreed to cause the RBTT Subsidiaries to,
cease and terminate any solicitation, initiation, encouragement,
activity, discussion or negotiation existing as of
October 1, 2007 with any parties conducted by RBTT, any
RBTT Subsidiary or their advisors or representatives with
respect to any RBTT Acquisition Proposal.
Additionally, RBTT has agreed to ensure that its Directors and
Executive Officers and those of the RBTT Subsidiaries and any
financial or other advisors or representatives retained by it or
the RBTT Subsidiaries are aware of the non-solicitation
provisions of the Combination Agreement, and RBTT has agreed to
be responsible for any breach of the non-solicitation provisions
of the Combination Agreement by such Directors, Executive
Officers, advisors and representatives.
RBTT has also agreed to: (i) require all Persons other than
RBC who have been furnished with confidential information
regarding RBTT or the RBTT Subsidiaries in connection with the
solicitation of or discussion regarding any RBTT Acquisition
Proposal within the 12 months prior to October 1, 2007
to promptly return or destroy such information, in accordance
with and subject to the terms of the confidentiality agreement
entered into with such Persons; (ii) terminate access for
all Persons (other than RBC and its representatives) of the
electronic dataroom accessible through the Intralinks website;
and (iii) not amend, modify, waive or fail to enforce any
of the standstill terms or other conditions included in any of
the confidentiality agreements between RBTT and any third
parties.
13.5
Superior
Proposal
Notwithstanding the non-solicitation provisions of the
Combination Agreement described above, nothing contained in the
Combination Agreement shall prevent the Directors prior to the
approval by the RBTT Shareholders of the RBTT Amalgamation
Resolution from considering, participating in any discussions or
negotiations, or entering into a
confidentiality agreement and providing information pursuant to
the provisions described below, regarding a bona fide written
RBTT Acquisition Proposal if and only to the extent that:
(i) such RBTT Acquisition Proposal did not result from a
breach of the non-solicitation provisions of the Combination
Agreement; and (ii) the Directors determine in good faith
in the exercise of the fiduciary duties of the Directors, after
consultation with their financial advisors and outside legal
counsel, that such RBTT Acquisition Proposal constitutes or
would be reasonably likely to constitute, if consummated in
accordance with its terms, an RBTT Superior Proposal.
RBTT has agreed to promptly (and in any event within 24 hours)
notify RBC of the receipt by it of any RBTT Acquisition Proposal
or of any proposal, inquiry or offer that would reasonably be
expected to lead to an RBTT Acquisition Proposal, including
providing a description of the material terms and conditions of
any proposal, the identity of the Person making such proposal
and such other details of the proposal as RBC may reasonably
request. RBTT must keep RBC promptly and fully informed of the
status, including any change to any of the terms of any such
RBTT Acquisition Proposal.
If RBTT receives a request for material non-public information
from a Person who has made a bona fide, unsolicited written RBTT
Acquisition Proposal and the Directors determine in good faith
in the exercise of the fiduciary duties of the Directors, after
consultation with their financial advisors and outside legal
counsel, that such RBTT Acquisition Proposal constitutes or
would be reasonably likely to constitute, if consummated in
accordance with its terms, an RBTT Superior Proposal, then the
Directors may, subject to such Person having executed a
confidentiality agreement containing confidentiality and
standstill provisions substantially similar to those contained
in the Confidentiality Agreement, provide such Person with
access to information regarding RBTT; provided, however, that
the Person making the RBTT Acquisition Proposal shall not be
precluded under such confidentiality or standstill agreement if
entered into after October 1, 2007 from making the RBTT
Acquisition Proposal and RBC is provided with a copy of such
confidentiality agreement, together with a list of or copies of
the written material provided to such Person, if not previously
provided to RBC.
13.6
Matching
Period
Notwithstanding the non-solicitation provisions of the
Combination Agreement, RBTT may accept, approve, recommend (or
change or withdraw its recommendation in respect of the
Amalgamation) or enter into any Contract, in respect of an RBTT
Superior Proposal prior to the approval by the RBTT Shareholders
of the RBTT Amalgamation Resolution and terminate the
Combination Agreement if, and only if: (i) it has provided
RBC with a copy of the RBTT Superior Proposal document;
(ii) the Matching Period, being ten (10) Business
Days, shall have elapsed from the later of (A) the date RBC
received the Superior Proposal Notice advising RBC that the
Directors have resolved to accept, approve, recommend (or
change, withdraw, modify or qualify their recommendation in
respect of the Amalgamation) or enter into a Contract in respect
of such RBTT Superior Proposal, and (B) the date RBC
receives a copy of the RBTT Superior Proposal document;
(iii) taking into account any revised proposal made by RBC
since receipt of the Superior Proposal Notice, the
Directors determine in good faith in the exercise of the
fiduciary duties of the Directors, after consultation with their
financial advisors and outside legal counsel, that such RBTT
Superior Proposal remains an RBTT Superior Proposal; and
(iv) RBTT has previously or concurrently will have
(A) paid to RBC the termination payment payable under the
Combination Agreement and (B) terminated the Combination
Agreement pursuant to the provisions described thereunder.
During the Matching Period, RBTT has agreed that RBC shall have
the right, but not the obligation, to offer to amend the terms
of the Combination Agreement. The Directors will review any
offer by RBC to amend the terms of the Combination Agreement in
good faith in order to determine, in the exercise of the
fiduciary duties of the Directors, whether RBC’s offer upon
acceptance by RBTT would result in such RBTT Superior Proposal
ceasing to be an RBTT Superior Proposal. If the Directors so
determine, RBTT will promptly enter into an amended agreement
with RBC reflecting RBC’s amended proposal. If the
Directors continue to believe, in good faith and after
consultation with their financial advisors and outside counsel,
that such RBTT Superior Proposal remains an RBTT Superior
Proposal and therefore rejects RBC’s amended proposal, RBTT
shall promptly notify RBC of such determination and may
terminate the Combination Agreement pursuant to the provisions
set forth thereunder, provided, however, that RBTT must
concurrently pay to RBC the termination payment payable to RBC
under the Combination Agreement and must concurrently with
termination enter into a definitive agreement with respect to
such RBTT Superior Proposal. RBTT has also acknowledged and
agreed that each successive modification of any RBTT Acquisition
Proposal will constitute a new RBTT Acquisition Proposal for
purposes of the non-solicitation provisions of the Combination
Agreement and the requirements under the Matching Period
provisions of the Combination Agreement to initiate an
additional ten (10) Business Days’ Matching Period.
If the expiry of the Matching Period falls on a date which is
less than ten (10) Business Days prior to the RBTT Meeting,
RBTT has agreed to, at the request of RBC, adjourn or postpone
the RBTT Meeting to a date which is not more than ten
(10) Business Days following such expiry date.
None of the Matching Period provisions of the Combination
Agreement in any way limit the obligation of RBTT to convene and
hold the RBTT Meeting unless the Combination Agreement is
terminated in accordance with the termination provisions of the
Combination Agreement.
13.7
Filings,
Consents and Approvals
The Parties have agreed to use commercially reasonable efforts
to co-operate in the preparation, seeking and obtaining of all
circulars, filings, consents, Regulatory Approvals and other
approvals and other matters in connection with the Combination
Agreement, the Ancillary Agreements and the Amalgamation,
necessary to discharge their respective obligations under
Barbados, Trinidad and Tobago and other applicable federal,
provincial, territorial or state Laws in connection with the
Amalgamation and the other transactions contemplated by the
Combination Agreement and the Ancillary Agreements.
RBTT has also agreed to: (a) defend, in consultation with
RBC, all lawsuits or other legal, regulatory or other
proceedings challenging or affecting the Combination Agreement
or the consummation of the transactions contemplated by the
Combination Agreement; and (b) use commercially reasonable
efforts to have lifted or rescinded any injunction or
restraining order or other order which may adversely affect the
ability of the Parties to consummate the transactions
contemplated by the Combination Agreement.
Notwithstanding any other provision of the Combination
Agreement, RBC will not be required to seek any Regulatory
Approval or make any filing, notice, registration, application,
or statement to any Governmental Entity relating to the issuance
of the RBC Common Shares (other than in connection with the
listing of the RBC Common Shares on the RBC Exchanges) if the
terms and conditions of such Regulatory Approval, filing,
notice, registration, application or statement is not
satisfactory to RBC, in its sole discretion.
13.8
Mutual
Conditions Precedent
The respective obligations of the Parties to complete the
transactions contemplated by the Combination Agreement are
subject to the satisfaction, on or before the Closing Date of
the following conditions precedent, each of which may only be
waived by the mutual consent of each of the Parties:
•
the Required RBTT Vote shall have been obtained;
•
the Certificate of Amalgamation shall have been issued by the
Registrar;
•
the Regulatory Approvals (other than the Canadian Bank
Approvals) shall have been obtained or satisfied on terms and
conditions satisfactory to the Parties, acting reasonably;
•
the Canadian Bank Approvals shall have been obtained;
•
there shall not be in force any Law prohibiting or enjoining the
consummation of the transactions contemplated by the Combination
Agreement and there shall be no proceeding in progress
instituted by a Governmental Entity that relates to or results
from the transactions contemplated by the Combination Agreement
that would, if successful, result in an order or ruling of a
Governmental Entity that would preclude completion of the
transactions contemplated by the Combination Agreement in
accordance with its terms;
•
the Closing Date shall have occurred by the Outside Date; and
•
the RBC Common Shares issuable pursuant to the Redemption
(i) shall be duly authorized for issuance, including with
any applicable securities commission or other Governmental
Entity and all consents, approvals and notices required in
connection therewith shall have been obtained or made,
(ii) shall be subject to no resale restrictions (other than
those restrictions provided for in section 2.6 of National
Instrument 45-102), and (iii) shall have been approved for
listing on the RBC Exchanges, subject to notice of issuance.
Additional
Conditions Precedent to the Obligations of RBTT
The obligations of RBTT to complete the transactions
contemplated by the Combination Agreement shall also be subject
to the fulfilment of each of the following additional conditions
precedent (each of which is for RBTT’s exclusive benefit
and may be waived by RBTT):
•
the representations and warranties of RBC contained in the
Combination Agreement (without giving effect to any materiality
(including the word “material” or “RBC Material
Adverse Effect”) qualification) shall be true and correct
as of the Closing Date with the same effect as if made at and as
of the Closing Date (other than such representations that are
made as of a specified date, which shall be true and correct as
of such date), except as would not reasonably be expected to
have, individually or in the aggregate, an RBC Material Adverse
Effect;
•
RBC shall have in all material respects fulfilled or complied
with all covenants contained in the Combination Agreement and in
every Ancillary Agreement to be fulfilled or complied with it at
or prior to the Closing;
•
since October 1, 2007, there shall not have been or
occurred an RBC Material Adverse Effect nor shall have any event
occurred or circumstance arisen which, individually or in the
aggregate, may give rise to an RBC Material Adverse Effect; and
•
RBC shall have delivered to RBTT counterparts of each Ancillary
Agreement to which it is to be a party, duly executed by RBC,
and each other certificate or instrument required by the
Combination Agreement or any Ancillary Agreement to be delivered
by RBC on or prior to Closing, duly executed by RBC. All such
Ancillary Agreements, certificates and instruments shall be in
form and substance reasonably satisfactory to RBTT.
13.10
Additional
Conditions Precedent to the Obligations of RBC
The obligations of RBC to complete the transactions contemplated
by the Combination Agreement shall also be subject to the
fulfilment of each of the following additional conditions
precedent (each of which is for the exclusive benefit of RBC and
may be waived by RBC):
•
the representations and warranties of RBTT relating to corporate
matters, corporate authorization, execution and binding
obligation, authorized and issued capital, subsidiaries, and
brokers and finders shall be true and correct in all material
respects as of the Closing Date with the same effect as if made
at and as of the Closing Date (other than such representations
that are made as of a specified date, which shall be true and
correct as of such date);
•
the other representations and warranties of RBTT contained in
the Combination Agreement (without giving effect to any
materiality (including the word “material” or
“RBTT Material Adverse Effect”) qualification) shall
be true and correct, in each case as of the Closing Date with
the same effect as if made at and as of the Closing Date (other
than such representations that are made as of a specified date,
which shall be true and correct as of such date), except as
would not reasonably be expected to have, individually or in the
aggregate, an RBTT Material Adverse Effect;
•
RBTT shall have in all material respects fulfilled or complied
with all covenants contained in the Combination Agreement and in
any Ancillary Agreement to be fulfilled or complied with by it
at or prior to Closing;
•
since October 1, 2007, there shall not have been or
occurred an RBTT Material Adverse Effect nor shall have any
event occurred or circumstance arisen which, individually or in
the aggregate, may give rise to an RBTT Material Adverse Effect;
•
RBTT shall have delivered to RBC counterparts of each Ancillary
Agreement to which RBTT is to be a party, duly executed by RBTT,
and each other certificate or instrument required by the
Combination Agreement or any Ancillary Agreement to be delivered
by RBTT on or prior to Closing, duly executed by RBTT. All such
Ancillary Agreements, certificates and instruments shall be in
form and substance reasonably satisfactory to RBC;
•
RBTT Shareholders shall not have exercised dissent or similar
rights in connection with the transactions contemplated by the
Combination Agreement, other than RBTT Shareholders holding no
more than 5% of the outstanding RBTT Ordinary Shares;
•
the terms and conditions upon which the Canadian Bank Approvals
shall have been obtained shall be satisfactory to RBC;
•
all Regulatory Approvals relating to the issuance of the RBC
Common Shares shall have been obtained on terms and conditions
satisfactory to RBC, in its sole discretion;
RBC shall be satisfied in its sole discretion that no stamp duty
or other similar Taxes shall be payable in connection with the
consummation of the transactions contemplated by the Combination
Agreement (other than Taxes not exceeding U.S.$200,000 in the
aggregate);
•
within 45 days after the entering into of the Combination
Agreement, RBC or an RBC Subsidiary shall have entered into
employment contracts, conditional on Closing, with the Chief
Executive Officer of RBTT and at least four other executive
officers of RBTT, in each case on terms and conditions
satisfactory to RBC; and
•
the Third Party Consents shall have been obtained.
13.11
Termination
of the Combination Agreement
By
RBTT for Breach of Representations, Warranties or Covenants by
RBC
Subject to certain notice and cure provisions of the Combination
Agreement, the Combination Agreement may be terminated by RBTT
if there has been a breach of or failure to perform any
representation, warranty, covenant or agreement on the part of
RBC set forth in the Combination Agreement, which breach or
failure to perform would cause:
•
the representations and warranties of RBC contained in the
Combination Agreement (without giving effect to any materiality
(including the word “material” or “RBC Material
Adverse Effect”) qualification) to not be true and correct
as of the Closing Date with the same effect as if made at and as
of the Closing Date (other than such representations that are
made as of a specified date, which shall be true and correct as
of such date), except as would not reasonably be expected to
have, individually or in the aggregate, an RBC Material Adverse
Effect; or
•
RBC to not in all material respects have fulfilled or complied
with all covenants contained in the Combination Agreement and in
every Ancillary Agreement to be fulfilled or complied with by it
at or prior to the Closing.
By RBC
for Breach of Representations, Warranties or Covenants by
RBTT
Subject to certain notice and cure provisions of the Combination
Agreement, the Combination Agreement may be terminated by RBC if
there has been a breach of or failure to perform any
representation, warranty, covenant or agreement on the part of
RBTT set forth in the Combination Agreement, which breach or
failure to perform would cause:
•
the representations and warranties of RBTT relating to corporate
matters, corporate authorization, execution and binding
obligation, authorized and issued capital, subsidiaries, and
brokers and finders to not be true and correct in all material
respects as of the Closing Date with the same effect as if made
at and as of the Closing Date (other than such representations
that are made as of a specified date, which shall be true and
correct as of such date);
•
the other representations and warranties of RBTT contained in
the Combination Agreement (without giving effect to any
materiality (including the word “material” or
“RBTT Material Adverse Effect”) qualification) to not
be true and correct, in each case as of the Closing Date with
the same effect as if made at and as of the Closing Date (other
than such representations that are made as of a specified date,
which shall be true and correct as of such date), except as
would not reasonably be expected to have, individually or in the
aggregate, an RBTT Material Adverse Effect; and
•
RBTT to not in all material respects have fulfilled or complied
with all covenants contained in the Combination Agreement and in
any Ancillary Agreement to be fulfilled or complied with by it
at or prior to Closing.
Additional
Grounds for Termination
The Combination Agreement may also be terminated:
•
by the mutual agreement of the Parties (and without the
necessity of further action on the part of the RBTT Shareholders
if terminated after the holding of the RBTT Meeting);
•
by either of the Parties, if there shall be passed any Law that
makes consummation of the transactions contemplated by the
Combination Agreement illegal or otherwise prohibited or if any
injunction or order enjoining the Parties from consummating the
transactions contemplated by the Combination Agreement is
entered and has become final and non-appealable;
•
by RBC, if the Directors or any committee of the Directors shall
have (i) failed to recommend or withdrawn or modified or
changed, in a manner adverse to RBC, its approval or
recommendation of the Combination Agreement or the Amalgamation,
or failed to publicly affirm and/or reaffirm its approval or
recommendation of the Combination Agreement or the Amalgamation,
or (ii) recommended an RBTT Acquisition Proposal or an
RBTT Superior Proposal, or if RBTT shall have wilfully breached
its obligations under the non-solicitation provisions of the
Combination Agreement in any material respect;
•
by RBC, if the Amalgamation is not submitted for the approval of
RBTT Shareholders at the RBTT Meeting by the RBTT Meeting Date;
•
by RBTT, in order to enter into a definitive written agreement
with respect to an RBTT Superior Proposal, subject to compliance
with the non-solicitation provisions of the Combination
Agreement and the payment of any termination payment required to
be paid by the termination payment provisions set forth therein;
•
by RBC, if RBTT enters into an agreement (other than as
permitted by the non-solicitation provisions of the Combination
Agreement) which facilitates an RBTT Acquisition Proposal;
•
by RBTT or RBC if the Required RBTT Vote shall not have been
obtained at the RBTT Meeting;
•
by RBTT or RBC if any of the Regulatory Approvals shall not have
been obtained prior to the Closing Date, provided that the Party
seeking to terminate on this basis shall have complied with the
applicable provisions of the Combination Agreement relating to
filings, approvals and consents, including using commercially
reasonable efforts to obtain all such filings, approvals and
consents; or
•
if the Closing Date does not occur on or prior to the Outside
Date, then the Combination Agreement may be terminated by RBC
(unless such failure is principally the result of a material
default by RBC of its obligations under the Combination
Agreement) or RBTT (unless such failure is principally the
result of a material default by RBTT of its obligations under
the Combination Agreement).
13.12
Termination
Payment
RBTT has agreed to pay to RBC or as RBC may otherwise direct in
writing, the U.S. Dollar Equivalent of approximately
TT$343.8 million if:
•
RBTT terminates the Combination Agreement in order to enter into
a definitive written agreement with respect to an RBTT Superior
Proposal;
•
RBC terminates the Combination Agreement because:
•
the Directors shall have (x) failed to recommend or
withdrawn or modified or changed, in a manner adverse to RBC,
their approval or recommendation of the Combination Agreement or
the Amalgamation, or (y) recommended an RBTT Acquisition
Proposal or an RBTT Superior Proposal, or if RBTT shall have
wilfully breached its obligations under the non-solicitation
provisions of the Combination Agreement in any material respect;
•
the Amalgamation is not submitted for the approval of RBTT
Shareholders at the RBTT Meeting by the RBTT Meeting Date; or
•
RBTT enters into an agreement (other than as permitted by the
non-solicitation provisions of the Combination Agreement) which
facilitates an RBTT Acquisition Proposal;
•
either RBTT or RBC, as applicable, terminates the Combination
Agreement because of:
•
a breach of or failure to perform any representation, warranty,
covenant or agreement on the part of RBC to the degree required
by the Combination Agreement;
•
a breach of or failure to perform any representation, warranty,
covenant or agreement on the part of RBTT to the degree required
by the Combination Agreement;
•
a failure to obtain the Required RBTT Vote at the RBTT Meeting;
and
•
a bona fide RBTT Acquisition Proposal has been made by any
Person other than RBC prior to the RBTT Meeting and is not
withdrawn by the date of the RBTT Meeting (with the term
“RBTT Acquisition Proposal” having, for the purposes
of this clause, the definition ascribed to such term in the
Glossary of Terms except that references to “20%”
shall be deemed to be references to “50%”);
•
the Required RBTT Vote is not obtained at the RBTT Meeting; and
RBTT (A) consummates an RBTT Acquisition Proposal or
(B) enters into an agreement with respect to an RBTT
Acquisition Proposal with such Person or any of its Affiliates,
in either case prior to the expiration of twelve
(12) months following the RBTT Meeting Date (with the term
“RBTT Acquisition Proposal” having, for the purposes
of this clause, the definition ascribed to such term in the
Glossary of Terms except that references to “20%”
shall be deemed to be references to “50%”); or
•
either RBTT or RBC terminates the Combination Agreement because
the Closing Date does not occur on or prior to the Outside Date
in circumstances where (i) a bona fide RBTT Acquisition
Proposal has been made by any Person other than RBC prior to the
date of such termination, and (ii) RBTT
(A) consummates an RBTT Acquisition Proposal or
(B) enters into an agreement with respect to an RBTT
Acquisition Proposal with such Person or any of its Affiliates,
in either case prior to the expiration of twelve
(12) months following such termination of the Combination
Agreement (with the term “RBTT Acquisition Proposal”
having, for the purposes of this clause, the definition ascribed
to such term in the Glossary of Terms except that references to
“20%” shall be deemed to be references to
“50%”).
The quantum of the termination payment is the equivalent of 2.5%
of the aggregate consideration to be received by RBTT
Shareholders in connection with the Amalgamation, as determined
by the product of the Per Share Consideration and the number of
RBTT Ordinary Shares in issue. In the view of RBTT, a
termination payment of this nature and size is consistent with a
transaction of this type.
13.13
RBTT
Options
Pursuant to the Combination Agreement, the RBTT Option Plan has
been amended such that, subject to and conditional upon Closing:
(i) all issued and outstanding RBTT Options will be deemed
to have vested, immediately prior to the Effective Time;
(ii) each unexercised RBTT
In-The-Money
Option will be deemed cancelled, immediately prior to the
Effective Time, in exchange for a cash amount equal to the
difference between the Per Share Consideration and its exercise
price; (iii) each RBTT
Out-Of-The-Money
Option will be cancelled immediately prior to the Effective Time
without payment of any further consideration; and (iv) no
exercises of RBTT Options shall be permitted from and after the
date that is five (5) Business Days prior to the Closing
Date.
As at the date of the Circular, approximately 59.40% of the RBTT
Options issued and outstanding were RBTT
In-The-Money
Options and approximately 40.60% of the RBTT Options issued and
outstanding were RBTT
Out-Of-The-Money
Options.
Neither RBC nor RBTT is aware of any material approval or other
action by any federal, provincial, state or foreign government
or any administrative or regulatory agency that would be
required to be obtained prior to the Effective Date, other than
as described below and elsewhere in the Circular. Any additional
filings or consents, if required, will be sought but these
additional requirements may delay the Effective Date or prevent
the completion of the Amalgamation. Subject to the satisfaction
or waiver of all conditions to closing set forth in the
Combination Agreement, it is anticipated that the Amalgamation
will become effective in the second quarter of 2008.
14.1
Canadian
Bank Approvals
Pursuant to the terms of the Combination Agreement, the
Amalgamation requires approval by the Superintendent under the
Bank Act, including approval of:
•
the acquisition by RBC of a substantial investment in, and
control of, RBTT and each RBTT Subsidiary that carries on a
financial services activity under section 468(6) of the Bank
Act; and
•
the issuance of the RBC Common Shares (section 65(1) of the Bank
Act imposes a requirement to obtain consent from the
Superintendent prior to the issuance for non-cash consideration
of any shares of a bank governed by the Bank Act, and therefore
RBC must obtain the consent of the Superintendent in respect of
the issuance of RBC Common Shares pursuant to the Amalgamation).
Pursuant to the terms of the Combination Agreement, the
following Regulatory Approvals shall have been obtained or
satisfied on terms and conditions satisfactory to the Parties,
acting reasonably, prior to the Effective Date:
•
approvals of, and filings with, the RBC Exchanges;
•
approvals and filings by RBC under applicable securities Laws,
including in connection with the issuance of the RBC Common
Shares;
•
approvals and licences under the Foreign Investment Act
(Trinidad and Tobago);
•
approvals of the Central Bank and Minister of Finance under the
Financial Institutions Act (Trinidad and Tobago);
•
approval of the Minister of Finance under the Banking Act
(Jamaica);
•
approval of the Minister of Finance under the Financial
Institutions (Amendment) Act 2006 (Barbados);
•
approval, if any, of the Fair Trading Commission under the Fair
Competition Act (Barbados);
•
approval of the Central Bank of the Netherlands Antilles under
the National Ordinance on the Supervision of Banking and Credit
Institutions 1994 (Netherlands Antilles);
•
approval of the Central Bank of Aruba under the State Ordinance
on the Supervision of the Credit System of Aruba;
•
approval of the Eastern Caribbean Central Bank under Banking Act
No. 19 of 2005 (Grenada);
•
approval of the Minister of Finance acting on the recommendation
of the Eastern Caribbean Central Bank under the Banking Act,
2005 (Antigua);
•
approval of the Eastern Caribbean Central Bank under the Banking
Act, 2005 (Nevis);
•
approvals of, if any, and filings with the TTSEC, FSC and BSC;
and
•
approvals of, if any, and filings with the TTSE, JSE and BSE.
The stated capital attributable to the ordinary shares of the
Corporation issuable upon the cancellation of the ordinary
shares of RBC Holdings (Trinidad & Tobago) will be
equal to the aggregate stated capital attributable to such
ordinary shares of RBC Holdings (Trinidad & Tobago).
The stated capital attributable to the Redeemable Preferred
Shares of the Corporation issuable upon the cancellation of the
RBTT Ordinary Shares shall be equal to the aggregate stated
capital attributable to such RBTT Ordinary Shares.
15.2
Articles
of Amalgamation
Subject to the terms and conditions of the Combination Agreement
(including the obtaining of all required regulatory and other
approvals and the satisfaction or waiver of all other conditions
to completion of the Amalgamation) and in accordance with the
Companies Act and the regulations thereunder, the Amalgamation
will be implemented by the filing of Articles of Amalgamation
and the issuance of the Certificate of Amalgamation on the
Effective Date, with such other matters as are necessary to
effect the Amalgamation, including any and all documents
required by the Companies Act and the regulations thereunder.
Upon issuance of the Certificate of Amalgamation, the Articles
of Amalgamation will be the articles of incorporation of the
Corporation.
15.3
Effect
of Amalgamation
From and after the Effective Time:
•
the property of each of the Amalgamating Corporations will
become the property of the Corporation;
•
the Corporation will become liable for the obligations of each
Amalgamating Corporation;
any existing cause of action, claim or liability to prosecution
against an Amalgamating Corporation will remain unaffected;
•
any civil, criminal or administrative action or proceeding
pending by or against an Amalgamating Corporation may be
continued by or against the Corporation; and
•
any conviction against, or ruling, order or judgment in favour
of or against, an Amalgamating Corporation may be enforced by or
against the Corporation.
15.4
Stock
Exchange Listings
RBTT
Ordinary Shares
The RBTT Ordinary Shares will be delisted from the RBTT
Exchanges after the Effective Time.
RBC
Common Shares
The RBC Common Shares are traded on the RBC Exchanges under the
symbol “RY”. RBC has agreed to apply to the RBC
Exchanges to list the RBC Common Shares to be issued following
the completion of the Amalgamation and, pursuant to the
Combination Agreement, it is a condition to completion of the
Amalgamation that the RBC Common Shares to be issued following
the completion of the Amalgamation are approved for listing on
the RBC Exchanges.
Depository
Receipt Structure
RBC has committed to the creation of a depository receipt
structure in which units denominated in TT$ and issued under a
deposit agreement representing RBC Common Shares, will be listed
on the TTSE, and subject to the factors set forth in section 6.2
above.
15.5
Ongoing
Reporting Obligations
After the completion of the Redemption, the Corporation will be
an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of RBC. Accordingly, RBTT
will make all applicable filings with the securities regulatory
authorities in Trinidad and Tobago, Barbados and Jamaica, where
it is currently a reporting issuer (or equivalent), to, among
other things, cease to be a reporting issuer (or equivalent) as
of the Effective Date, so as to no longer be subject to
statutory financial, reporting and/or other requirements under
the securities legislation of these jurisdictions.
15.6
Resale
of RBC Common Shares Received Following the Completion of the
Amalgamation
Canada
Pursuant to section 2.11 of National Instrument 45-106
(Prospectus and Registration Exemptions) the distribution of RBC
Common Shares to be issued following the completion of the
Amalgamation will be exempt from the prospectus and registration
requirements of applicable Canadian securities laws.
Pursuant to section 2.6 of Multilateral Instrument 45-102
(Resale of Securities), there will be no restrictions on the
first trade of RBC Common Shares issued following the completion
of the Amalgamation so long as RBC continues to be a reporting
issuer in any Canadian jurisdiction provided (i) such first
trade is not a trade by a “control person”,
(ii) no unusual effort is made to prepare the market or to
create a demand therefor, (iii) no extraordinary commission
or consideration is paid to a person or company in respect
thereto, and (iv) if the selling securityholder is an
insider or officer of RBC, the selling securityholder has no
reasonable grounds to believe that RBC is in default of
securities legislation.
Holders of RBC Common Shares should refer to applicable
provisions of the securities legislation of their respective
jurisdiction or consult with their legal advisers with respect
to the resale of RBC Common Shares received following the
completion of the Amalgamation. Pursuant to the Combination
Agreement, the completion of the Amalgamation is conditional on,
among other things, the RBC Common Shares to be issued following
the completion of the Amalgamation being (i) duly
authorized by all corporate action necessary to approve the
issuance thereof, including with any applicable securities
commission, and (ii) subject to no resale restrictions,
other than as described above.
Holders of RBC Common Shares should note, however, that approval
or exemption by any Canadian provincial or federal securities
regulatory authority does not independently constitute a
registration or exemption in the U.S. under the 1933 Act.
The RBC Common Shares to be issued following the completion of
the Amalgamation have not been and will not be registered under
the 1933 Act and are being issued in reliance on the exemption
from registration in Rule 802 under the 1933 Act. Neither
the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission nor any U.S. state
securities commission has approved the issuance of the
securities, or determined if this document is accurate or
complete. The offer is not being made directly or indirectly in
any jurisdiction where prohibited by applicable law.
The RBC Common Shares to be issued in connection with the
Amalgamation may be sold without registration under the 1933 Act
unless the holder thereof is an “affiliate” of RBC, as
such term is defined in the rules and regulations under the 1933
Act.
PART 16 —
MARKET
PRICES OF AND DIVIDENDS ON RBTT ORDINARY SHARES
AND RBC COMMON SHARES
16.1
Ordinary/Common
Share Prices
RBTT Ordinary Shares are traded on the TTSE in Trinidad and
Tobago, the BSE in Barbados and the JSE in Jamaica. RBC Common
Shares are traded on the TSX in Canada, the NYSE in the U.S. and
the Swiss Exchange in Switzerland. The following table sets
forth, for the calendar periods indicated, the high and low
closing prices of the RBTT Ordinary Shares as reported on the
TTSE, expressed in Trinidad and Tobago dollars, and RBC Common
Shares as reported on the TSX and NYSE, expressed in Canadian
dollars and U.S. dollars, respectively. Prices for RBTT Ordinary
Shares on the BSE and the JSE generally mirror the TTSE prices
and therefore such prices are not included in the table. All
prices for RBC Common Shares have been adjusted to reflect a
stock dividend of one RBC Common Share on each issued and
outstanding RBC Common Share, the effect of which is the same as
a
two-for-one
share split effected on April 6, 2006.
RBTT
RBC
Ordinary Shares
Common Shares
Period
TTSE
TSX
NYSE
Calendar Year
High
Low
High
Low
High
Low
(TT$)
(CDN$)
(U.S.$)
2005
First Quarter
$
40.00
$
39.00
$
37.44
$
31.15
$
30.70
$
25.32
Second Quarter
$
45.53
$
36.37
$
38.50
$
36.55
$
31.15
$
29.30
Third Quarter
$
41.00
$
37.26
$
43.06
$
37.55
$
36.67
$
30.38
Fourth Quarter
$
40.50
$
37.50
$
45.45
$
40.88
$
38.99
$
34.70
2006
First Quarter
$
40.50
$
31.30
$
51.00
$
44.45
$
43.73
$
38.68
Second Quarter
$
33.25
$
28.01
$
49.37
$
43.88
$
43.07
$
39.06
Third Quarter
$
32.00
$
28.00
$
50.70
$
45.50
$
45.67
$
40.65
Fourth Quarter
$
37.50
$
24.00
$
55.50
$
48.34
$
48.08
$
42.45
2007
First Quarter
$
37.50
$
28.01
$
58.64
$
53.50
$
50.53
$
45.50
Second Quarter
$
34.00
$
29.01
$
60.62
$
55.30
$
55.85
$
49.96
Third Quarter
$
34.01
$
29.99
$
58.14
$
51.89
$
55.56
$
48.18
Fourth Quarter
$
36.50
$
33.05
$
56.53
$
48.91
$
59.16
$
49.58
On September 28, 2007, the last full trading day on the
TTSE prior to the public announcement of the Amalgamation, the
closing sale price per RBTT Ordinary Share as reported on the
TTSE was TT$34.01 and the closing sale price per RBC Common
Share, as reported on the TSX and NYSE, was CDN$55.05 and
U.S.$55.52, respectively. On October 1, 2007, the last full
trading day on the TSX and NYSE prior to the public announcement
of the Amalgamation, the closing sale price per RBC Common
Share, as reported on the TSX and NYSE, was CDN$55.93 and
U.S.$56.39, respectively. On
February 6, 2008, the last full trading day of the
RBTT Ordinary Shares prior to the date of the Circular, the
closing sale price per RBTT Ordinary Share as reported on the
TTSE was TT$34.86, and the closing sale price per RBC Common
Share as reported on the TSX and NYSE was CDN$50.12 and
U.S.$49.75, respectively. The closing sale price per
RBC Common Share on February 7, 2008, which was the
last full trading day of the RBC Common Shares before the
date of the Circular, was CDN$51.29 and U.S.$50.71, as reported
on the TSX and NYSE, respectively. Because the market price of
RBC Common Shares is subject to fluctuation due to numerous
market forces, the market value of the RBC Common Shares that
holders of RBTT Ordinary Shares will receive following the
completion of the Amalgamation may, in certain circumstances,
increase or decrease prior to the Effective Time. Historical
market prices are not indicative of future market prices.
16.2
Dividends
Paid
The following table sets forth, for the calendar periods
indicated, dividends paid per share on RBC Common Shares,
expressed in Canadian dollars, and RBTT Ordinary Shares,
expressed in Trinidad and Tobago dollars. All prices for RBC
Common Shares have been adjusted to reflect a stock dividend of
one RBC Common Share on each issued and outstanding RBC Common
Share, the effect of which is the same as a
two-for-one
share split effected on April 6, 2006.
Period
RBTT
RBC
(Calendar year)
Ordinary Shares
Common Shares
(TT$)
(CDN$)
2005
First Quarter
—
$
0.27500
Second Quarter
$
0.77000
$
0.27500
Third Quarter
—
$
0.30500
Fourth Quarter
$
0.55000
$
0.32000
2006
First Quarter
—
$
0.32000
Second Quarter
$
0.65000
$
0.36000
Third Quarter
—
$
0.36000
Fourth Quarter
$
0.60000
$
0.40000
2007
First Quarter
—
$
0.40000
Second Quarter
$
0.65000
$
0.46000
Third Quarter
—
$
0.46000
Fourth Quarter
$
0.60000
$
0.50000
Dividend amounts were paid in the quarter indicated.
16.3
Dividend
Policy
RBC
RBC has had an uninterrupted history of paying dividends on the
RBC Common Shares and on each of its outstanding series of First
Preferred Shares. The declaration amount and payment of future
dividends will be subject to the discretion of the RBC Board of
Directors, and will be dependent upon RBC’s results of
operations, financial condition, cash requirements, future
prospectus regulatory restrictions on the payment of dividends
and other factors deemed relevant by the RBC Board of Directors.
RBC’s 2007 dividend payout ratio objective (RBC Common
Share dividends as a percentage of net income less preferred
share dividends) was in the range of 40-50%. In 2007, RBC’s
payout ratio of 43% met its dividend payout ratio objective. For
2008, RBC’s dividend payout ratio objective remains
unchanged. In the first quarter 2008, RBC announced a dividend
of CDN$0.50 per RBC Common Share to be paid on February 22,2008 (CDN$2.00 per RBC Common Share annualized), an increase
from the first quarter 2007 quarterly dividend of CDN$0.40 per
RBC Common Share (CDN$1.60 annualized).
The Directors may from time to time declare dividends and have
historically declared dividends since commencing operations in
1972. The Directors have adopted a policy of dividend payments
being in the range of 40 to 50% of RBTT after-tax profits. In
the fourth quarter of 2007, RBTT paid a dividend of TT$0.60 per
RBTT Ordinary Share (TT$1.20 per RBTT Ordinary Share annualized)
which was on par with the dividend paid in the fourth quarter of
2006.
The following table sets forth, for each period indicated, the
high and low exchange rates for one Canadian dollar expressed in
Trinidad and Tobago dollars, the average of such high and low
exchange rates during such period, and the exchange rate at the
end of the period, in each case, based upon the average of the
Central Bank of Trinidad and Tobago daily volume weighted
average buying and selling rates, based on information received
from commercial banks operating in Trinidad and Tobago.
Year Ended December 31
2005
2006
2007
High
5.5274
5.7548
6.9119
Low
4.9249
5.3023
5.2817
Average
5.2261
5.5285
6.0968
Period End
5.3785
5.4404
6.4690
On February 7, 2008, the exchange rate for one Canadian
dollar expressed in Trinidad and Tobago dollars was 6.2429,
based upon the average of the Central Bank of Trinidad and
Tobago volume weighted average buying and selling rates on
that day.
17.2
Trinidad
And Tobago/U.S. Exchange Rates
The following table sets forth, for each period indicated, the
high and low exchange rates for one U.S. dollar expressed in
Trinidad and Tobago dollars, the average of such high and low
exchange rates during such period, and the exchange rate at the
end of the period, in each case, based upon the average of the
Central Bank of Trinidad and Tobago daily volume weighted
average buying and selling rates, based on information received
from commercial banks operating in Trinidad and Tobago.
Year Ended December 31
2005
2006
2007
High
6.3088
6.3366
6.3411
Low
6.2251
6.2249
6.2383
Average
6.2669
6.2807
6.2897
Period End
6.2985
6.2945
6.3113
On February 7, 2008, the exchange rate for one U.S. dollar
expressed in Trinidad and Tobago dollars was 6.2775, based upon
the average of the Central Bank of Trinidad and Tobago volume
weighted average buying and selling rates on that day.
Set forth below is selected consolidated historical financial
data of RBC as at and for the years ended October 31, 2003
through 2007. The selected financial data for each of the years
presented has been derived from the RBC’s audited
consolidated financial statements which are prepared in
accordance with Canadian generally accepted accounting
principles and presented in Canadian dollars. This selected
historical consolidated financial data should be read in
conjunction with RBC’s audited financial statements for the
year ended October 31, 2007 which are included in
Appendix “G”. RBC’s unaudited financial
statements for the three-month period ended January 31, 2008
will be filed in accordance with Canadian securities law
requirements on or about February 29, 2008 and will be available
on RBC’s website (“www.rbc.com”).
In September 2005, RBC completed the sale of RBC Mortgage
Company and by the end of fiscal 2006, had disposed of
substantially all of its remaining assets and obligations. For
periods prior to 2007, the results of RBC Mortgage Company are
presented separately as discontinued operations.
Set forth below is a summary of certain consolidated financial
information with respect to RBTT and its subsidiaries as of the
dates and for the periods indicated. The selected financial data
of RBTT and its subsidiaries as of and for the fiscal years
ended March 31, 2007, 2006, 2005, 2004 and 2003 have been
derived from audited financial statements of the respective
years. The selected financial data as of and for the nine months
ended December 31, 2007 and 2006 have been derived from the
unaudited interim financial statements for the periods ended
December 31, 2007 and 2006 respectively. RBTT audited
annual financial statements and RBTT unaudited interim financial
statements from which this selected financial information is
derived were prepared in accordance with IFRS. This selected
historical financial data should be read in conjunction with
RBTT’s audited annual financial statements for the year
ended March 31, 2007.
Appendix “F” to the Circular contains the RBTT
unaudited interim financial statements as of and for the nine
months ended December 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006.
RBTT’s audited annual financial statements for the year
ended March 31, 2007 form part of the RBTT Annual Report
2007 and were distributed to RBTT Shareholders. Copies are
available on RBTT’s website (“www.rbtt.com”) or
through the office of the Corporate Secretary of RBTT.
RBTT has not provided any pro forma financial statements
in the Circular, since it is of the view that such financial
statements provide no benefit to RBTT Shareholders in their
consideration of the RBTT Amalgamation Resolution.
The following summary of certain provisions of RBC’s
capital stock does not purport to be complete and is subject to,
and qualified in its entirety by the RBC By-laws and material
provisions of the Bank Act (which is RBC’s charter), as
they relate to RBC’s capital stock.
19.1
General
The authorized capital of RBC consists of an unlimited number of
RBC Common Shares without nominal or par value, and an unlimited
number of First Preferred Shares and Second Preferred Shares,
without nominal or par value, issuable in series. The aggregate
consideration for which all the First Preferred Shares and all
the Second Preferred Shares may be issued may not exceed
CDN$20 billion and CDN$5 billion, respectively.
As at January 31, 2008, there were outstanding the
following shares of RBC capital stock: (i) 1,276,430,911
RBC Common Shares; (ii) 12,000,000 Non-Cumulative
Redeemable First Preferred Shares Series N;
(iii) 12,000,000 Non-Cumulative Redeemable First Preferred
Shares Series W; (iv) 12,000,000 Non-Cumulative
Redeemable First Preferred Shares Series AA;
(v) 12,000,000 Non-Cumulative Redeemable First Preferred
Shares Series AB; (vi) 8,000,000 Non-Cumulative
Redeemable First Preferred Shares Series AC;
(vii) 10,000,000 Non-Cumulative Redeemable First Preferred
Shares Series AD; (viii) 10,000,000 Non-Cumulative
Redeemable First Preferred Shares Series AE;
(ix) 8,000,000 Non-Cumulative Redeemable First Preferred
Shares Series AF; and (x) 10,000,000 Non-Cumulative
Redeemable First Preferred Shares Series AG. No Second
Preferred Shares were issued and outstanding.
19.2
RBC
Common Shares
Voting. In accordance with the Bank Act,
holders of RBC Common Shares are entitled to one vote per share
on all matters to be voted on by holders of RBC Common Shares,
except at meetings at which only holders of a specified class of
shares are entitled to vote.
Size of Board of Directors. The Bank Act
requires that the number of directors on the RBC Board of
Directors be at least seven. The RBC By-laws provide that the
maximum number of directors on the RBC Board of Directors is 26.
Currently, the RBC Board of Directors consists of a single class
of 16 directors who are elected annually. The Bank Act also
requires that at least two-thirds of the directors on the RBC
Board of Directors must be, at the time of each director’s
election, resident Canadians.
Liquidation Rights. Upon the liquidation,
dissolution or winding up of RBC, whether voluntary or
involuntary, the holders of RBC Common Shares are entitled to
receive rateably the net assets of RBC available after the
payment of all debts and other liabilities and subject to the
prior rights of holders of any outstanding First Preferred
Shares and Second Preferred Shares.
Pre-emptive, Subscription, Redemption and Conversion
Rights. Holders of RBC Common Shares, as such,
have no pre-emptive, subscription, redemption or conversion
rights.
Dividends. The holders of RBC Common Shares
are entitled to receive dividends as and when declared by the
RBC Board of Directors, subject to the preference of holders of
the First Preferred Shares and Second Preferred Shares. RBC
dividends have historically been declared on a quarterly basis
in Canadian dollars. The declaration amount and payment of
future dividends will be subject to the discretion of the RBC
Board of Directors, and will be dependent upon the results of
operations, financial condition, cash requirements and future
prospects of, and regulatory restrictions on the payment of
dividends by, RBC and other factors deemed relevant by the RBC
Board of Directors. Under the Bank Act, RBC is prohibited from
declaring dividends on its preferred or common shares if there
are reasonable grounds for believing that RBC is, or the payment
would cause RBC to be, in contravention of the capital adequacy
and liquidity regulations of the Bank Act or any capital or
liquidity directions of the Superintendent. In addition, the
Superintendent administers a restriction under the Bank Act on
RBC’s ability to pay dividends on common and preferred
shares based on an assessment of the ongoing maintenance by RBC
of satisfactory regulatory capital and liquidity. The Bank Act
provides that dividends on outstanding shares may be declared by
the RBC directors and may be paid in money or property.
RBC is also restricted from paying dividends on its preferred or
common shares in the event that either of its subsidiaries that
have issued capital trust securities fails to pay semi-annual
distributions in full to holders of their capital trust
securities. In addition, the ability to pay dividends on
RBC’s common shares without the approval of the holders of
the outstanding preferred shares is restricted unless all
dividends on the preferred shares have been declared and paid or
set apart for payment. Currently, these limitations do not
restrict the payment of dividends on preferred or common shares.
Limitations
Affecting Holders of RBC Common Shares
RBC cannot redeem any of the RBC Common Shares. Under the Bank
Act, RBC cannot purchase any of the RBC Common Shares for the
purposes of cancellation without the prior consent of the
Superintendent. In addition, the Bank Act prohibits payment for
the purpose of purchasing any shares or the payment of a
dividend if there are reasonable grounds for believing that RBC
is, or the payment would cause RBC to be, in contravention of
certain capital and liquidity requirements of the Bank Act.
The Bank Act contains certain restrictions on the purchase or
other acquisition, issue, transfer and voting of the shares of
RBC. Under these provisions, no person is permitted to acquire
any shares of RBC if the acquisition would cause the person to
have a “significant interest” in any class of shares
of RBC unless the prior approval of the Minister of Finance is
obtained. In addition, RBC is not permitted to record any
transfer or issue of any shares of RBC if the transfer or issue
would cause the person to have a significant interest in RBC or
increase the person’s significant interest in RBC, unless
the prior approval of the Minister of Finance is obtained. No
person who has a significant interest in RBC may exercise any
voting rights attached to RBC Common Shares held by that person,
unless the prior approval of the Minister of Finance is
obtained. For these purposes, a person has a significant
interest in a class of shares of RBC where the aggregate of any
shares of that class beneficially owned by that person and any
shares of that class beneficially owned by entities controlled
by that person exceeds 10% of all of the outstanding shares of
that class of shares of RBC. If a person contravenes any of
these restrictions, the Minister of Finance may, by order,
direct that person to dispose any portion of those shares.
In addition, under the Bank Act, the Minister of Finance may
only approve the acquisition of up to 30% of the shares of any
class of non-voting shares and up to 20% of the shares of any
class of voting shares and provided, in each case, that the
person acquiring those shares does not have direct or indirect
influence over RBC that, if exercised, would result in that
person having control in fact of RBC. For these purposes, the
shares beneficially owned by that person and any entity
controlled by that person with respect to RBC Common Shares are
aggregated. In addition, the Bank Act prohibits RBC from
recording a transfer or issuing shares of any class to Her
Majesty in right of Canada or of a province, an agent of Her
Majesty or an entity controlled by Her Majesty, a foreign
government, an agent of a foreign government or an entity that
is controlled by a foreign government.
The government of Canada has placed a temporary moratorium on
mergers among Canada’s largest financial institutions,
including RBC and its peers. The government has stated that it
will lift this moratorium once it has had the opportunity to
complete a policy review of its merger review guidelines. No
precise timetable for the completion of this review has been
announced.
The restrictions contained in the Bank Act and the Canadian
government’s policies may deter, delay or prevent a future
acquisition of a “significant interest” in RBC and
will prevent the acquisition of control of RBC, including
transactions that could be perceived as advantageous to
RBC’s shareholders.
19.4
RBC
Preferred Shares
First Preferred Shares may be issued, from time to time, in one
or more series with such rights, privileges, restrictions and
conditions as the RBC Board of Directors may determine, subject
to the Bank Act and to the RBC By-laws. Currently,
Non-Cumulative First Preferred Shares Series N, W, AA, AB,
AC, AD, AE, AF and AG are outstanding. The Non-Cumulative First
Preferred Shares Series N and Series W are, subject to
the consent of the Superintendent and the requirements of the
Bank Act, redeemable or exchangeable by RBC into RBC Common
Shares. In addition, on and after August 24, 2008,
Non-Cumulative First Preferred Shares Series N will be
convertible by the holders into RBC Common Shares. The First
Preferred Shares are entitled to preference over the Second
Preferred Shares and RBC Common Shares and over any other shares
ranking junior to the First Preferred Shares with respect to the
payment of dividends and in the distribution of property in the
event of RBC’s liquidation, dissolution or winding-up.
Second Preferred Shares may be issued, from time to time, in one
or more series with such rights, privileges, restrictions and
conditions as the RBC Board of Directors may determine, subject
to the Bank Act and to the RBC By-laws. There are no Second
Preferred Shares currently outstanding. Second Preferred Shares
would rank junior to the First Preferred Shares. Second
Preferred Shares would be entitled to preference over the RBC
Common Shares and over any other shares ranking junior to the
Second Preferred Shares with respect to the payment of dividends
and in the distribution of property in the event of RBC’s
liquidation, dissolution or winding-up.
Holders of the First and Second Preferred Shares are not
entitled to any voting rights as a class except as provided
under the Bank Act or the RBC By-laws. Under the Bank Act, RBC
may not create any other class of shares ranking equal with or
superior to a particular class of preferred shares, increase the
authorized number of, or amend the rights, privileges,
restrictions or conditions attaching to such class of preferred
shares, without the approval of the holders of that class of
preferred shares.
Any approval to be given by the holders of the First and Second
Preferred Shares may be given in writing by the holders of not
less than all of the outstanding preferred shares of each class
or by a resolution carried by the affirmative vote of not less
than
662/3%
of the votes cast at a meeting of holders of each class of
preferred shares at which a quorum is represented. A quorum at
any meeting of holders of each class of preferred shares is 51%
of the shares entitled to vote at such meeting, except that at
an adjourned meeting there is no quorum requirement.
19.5
Amendments
to the Rights, Privileges, Restrictions and Conditions of
RBC’s Share Capital
Under the Bank Act, the rights of holders of RBC’s shares
can be changed by the RBC Board of Directors by making, amending
or repealing the RBC By-laws. The RBC Board of Directors must
submit such a by-law, or amendment to or repeal of a by-law, to
the shareholders of RBC in accordance with the procedures of the
Bank Act and the RBC By-laws, and the shareholders must approve
the by-law, amendment to or repeal of the by-law by special
resolution to be effective. Under the Bank Act, a special
resolution is a resolution passed by a majority of not less than
two-thirds of the votes cast by or on behalf of the shareholders
who voted in respect of that resolution or signed by all the
shareholders entitled to vote on that resolution. In some
circumstances, the Bank Act mandates that holders of shares of a
class or a series are entitled to vote separately as a class or
series on a proposal to amend the RBC By-laws.
19.6
Transfer
Agent and Registrar
RBC’s transfer agent and registrar in Canada is the
Computershare Trust Company of Canada at 1500 University
Street, Suite 700, Montreal, Quebec, Canada H3A 3S8.
Computershare Trust Company, N.A. is RBC’s co-transfer
agent in the U.S. at 350 Indiana Street, Suite 800, Golden,
Colorado, U.S.A. 80401, and Computershare Services plc is
RBC’s co-transfer agent in the United Kingdom at P.O. Box
No. 82, the Pavilions, Bridgwater Road, Bristol, England
BS99 7NH.
The following summary of certain provisions of RBTT’s share
capital does not purport to be complete and is subject to, and
qualified in its entirety by the RBTT Articles, RBTT By-laws and
by the provisions of applicable law, including the Companies Act.
20.1
General
The authorized capital of RBTT consists of an unlimited number
of RBTT Ordinary Shares without nominal or par value, and an
unlimited number RBTT Preferred Shares, each of which is
issuable in series and are without nominal or par value. As at
the date of the Circular, RBTT had 344,065,265 RBTT Ordinary
Shares issued and outstanding and no RBTT Preferred Shares were
issued and outstanding.
20.2
RBTT
Ordinary Shares
Voting. Any questions submitted to a meeting
of RBTT Shareholders shall be decided in the first instance by a
show of hands, and where a ballot is demanded in accordance with
the By-Laws of the Company, the holders of RBTT Shareholders are
entitled to one vote for each ordinary share on all matters to
be voted on by the shareholders.
Liquidation Rights. The RBTT Ordinary Shares
rank junior to the rights of the holders of all outstanding RBTT
Preferred Shares as to payment of dividends and as to repayment
of capital in the event of a liquidation, dissolution or winding
up of RBTT, whether voluntary or involuntary, or any other
distribution of the assets of RBTT among its shareholders for
the purpose of winding up its affairs. Each RBTT Ordinary Share
is equal to every other RBTT Ordinary Share and all RBTT
Ordinary Shares participate equally on liquidation or
distribution of assets.
Size of Board of Directors. The Companies Act
requires that the number of directors of RBTT’s board of
directors be at least three. The Companies Act currently has no
residency requirements for the directors.
Pre-emptive, Redemption, Purchase and Conversion
Rights. There are no pre-emptive, redemption,
purchase or conversion rights attaching to the RBTT Ordinary
Shares.
Dividends. The holders of RBTT Ordinary Shares
are entitled to receive dividends as and when declared by the
Directors, subject to the rights, privileges, restrictions and
conditions attaching to any other class or series of shares of
RBTT.
Under the Companies Act, RBTT is prohibited from declaring or
paying dividends on its outstanding shares if there are
reasonable grounds for believing that either: (i) RBTT is
unable, or would, after the payment, be unable, to pay its
liabilities as they become due; or (ii) the realizable
value of the RBTT’s assets would thereby be less than the
aggregate of its liabilities and stated capital of all classes.
The RBTT By-laws provide that, subject to the Companies Act,
dividends on outstanding shares may be declared by the Directors
and may be paid by the distribution of specific assets and in
particular of shares, debentures or debenture stock of RBTT, or
the shares, debentures or debenture stock of any other
corporation or in one or more of such ways.
20.3
RBTT
Preferred Shares
Creation and Issue of Series or Additional Classes of
Preferred Shares. RBTT Preferred Shares may be
issued, from time to time, without nominal or par value in one
or more series with such rights, privileges, restrictions and
conditions as the Directors may determine.
Priority. RBTT Preferred Shares are entitled
to preference over the RBTT Ordinary Shares with respect to
payment of dividends and in the distribution of property in the
event of liquidation, dissolution or winding-up. If any
cumulative dividends or amounts payable on the return of capital
in respect of a series of preferred shares are not paid in full,
all series of preferred shares shall participate rateably in
respect of accumulated dividends and return of capital.
Restriction. Under the Companies Act, the
approval of the holders of the RBTT Preferred Shares is required
for the creation of any class of shares ranking prior to or on a
parity with the RBTT Preferred Shares.
Voting. Unless the directors otherwise
determine in the articles of amendment designating a series, the
holder of each share of a series of preferred shares shall be
entitled to one vote at a meeting of holders of RBTT Preferred
Shares.
Amendment of Class Provisions. The
provisions attaching to RBTT Preferred Shares as a class may be
repealed, altered, modified or amended from time to time with
such approval as may then be required by the Companies Act to be
given by the holders of preferred shares as a class and in
accordance with the voting procedures as decided by the
Directors in accordance with the RBTT By-laws.
Conversion into Common Shares at RBTT’s
Option. If so decided by the Directors at the
time of issue, shares of any series of RBTT Preferred Shares may
be made convertible into RBTT Ordinary Shares.
20.4
Amendments
to the Rights, Privileges, Restrictions and Conditions of
RBTT’s Share Capital
Under the Companies Act, the rights of holders of RBTT’s
shares can be changed by amendment to the RBTT Articles, which
generally requires shareholder approval by special resolution. A
special resolution is a resolution passed at a meeting of RBTT
by not less than 75% of the votes cast by the shareholders who
voted in respect of the resolution. The Companies Act provides
that the holders of shares of a class of shares are entitled to
vote separately, as a class, upon a proposal to amend the RBTT
Articles. If a series of a class of shares is affected by an
amendment to the RBTT Articles in a manner different from other
shares of the same class, the holders of such series of shares
of a class are entitled to vote separately as a series.
20.5
Transfer
Agent and Registrar
RBTT’s transfer agent and registrar is RBTT
Trust Limited, Albion Plaza,
Port-of-Spain,
Trinidad and Tobago.
RBTT is governed by the Companies Act and, accordingly, is
governed by the laws of Trinidad and Tobago, the RBTT Articles
and the RBTT By-laws. RBC is a Schedule I bank under the
Bank Act, which is RBC’s charter. The Bank Act and the RBC
By-laws principally govern the rights of RBC’s
shareholders. In the event that the Amalgamation is consummated,
RBTT Shareholders will, at the Effective Time, have their RBTT
Ordinary Shares exchanged for the Per Share Consideration. The
rights of all former RBTT Shareholders who become holders of RBC
Common Shares following the completion of the Amalgamation will
then be governed by the RBC By-laws and the Bank Act.
While the rights and privileges of shareholders of a corporation
incorporated under the Companies Act are, in many instances,
comparable to those of shareholders of a corporation governed by
the Bank Act, there are certain important differences. The
following is a summary discussion of the most significant
differences in shareholder rights between RBTT and RBC. These
differences arise from differences between Trinidad and Tobago
and Canadian law, between the Bank Act and the Companies Act and
between the RBC By-laws and the RBTT Articles and RBTT By-laws.
While RBC and RBTT believe that this summary describes the
important differences among the rights of holders of RBC Common
Shares and RBTT Ordinary Shares as of the date of the Circular,
this summary is not intended to be complete and is qualified in
its entirety by reference to the Bank Act, the Companies Act and
the governing corporate instruments of RBC and RBTT. A
description of the respective rights of RBC Shareholders and
RBTT Shareholders is provided in the applicable sections of the
Circular. The following summary does not reflect any rules of
the TSX, NYSE or TTSE or of any other applicable stock exchanges
that may apply to RBTT or RBC in connection with the
Amalgamation.
21.1
Authorized
Capital Stock
RBTT’s authorized share capital and RBC’s authorized
share capital are set out above.
21.2
Number
and Elections of Directors
RBTT
The size of the board of directors of RBTT is determined by the
Directors provided that, pursuant to the Companies Act, while
RBTT is a public corporation there shall not be fewer than three
Directors, at least two of whom are not officers or employees of
RBTT or any of its affiliates. The RBTT By-laws provide that
there shall be no fewer than eight and no more than fourteen
Directors of which there shall be no more than five Directors
who are Executive Directors (officers or full-time employees of
RBTT or any of its affiliates), and provided always that, the
number of Directors who are not Executive Directors shall at all
times exceed the number of Executive Directors by two. The board
of directors of RBTT is currently comprised of 12 Directors. The
Directors can change the number of Directors within the minimum
and maximum number provided for in the RBTT Articles. Under the
RBTT By-laws, a Director shall be elected by the RBTT
Shareholders for an expressly stated term expiring not later
than the close of the third annual meeting following such
election, and if no such term is expressly stated, it shall be
deemed to be a term expiring at the close of the first annual
meeting following such election. Currently there are no
residency requirements for directors under the Companies Act.
RBC
Under the Bank Act, the RBC Board of Directors must have at
least seven members. The RBC By-laws provide that the maximum
number of directors on the board is 26. The Bank Act also
requires that no more than two-thirds of the directors may be
affiliated with RBC, as specified by the Bank Act, and no more
than 15% of the directors may be employees of RBC or a
subsidiary of RBC, except that up to four of these employees may
be directors if they constitute not more then 50% of the
directors. Under the Bank Act, a majority of the directors of
RBC must be resident Canadians and, except in limited
circumstances, directors may not transact business at a meeting
of directors or a committee of directors at which a majority of
the directors present are not resident Canadians. The Bank Act
also requires the directors of a corporation to appoint from
their members a chief executive officer who must ordinarily be
resident in Canada. The RBC Board of Directors is currently
comprised of 16 directors, who are elected annually. This is
within the minimum of seven required by the Bank Act and maximum
of 26 established by the RBC By-laws. The RBC By-laws provide
that the number of directors to be elected at any annual meeting
of shareholders of RBC will be fixed by the RBC Board of
Directors before the annual meeting.
21.3
Shareholder
Nominations
RBTT
Under the Companies Act, nominations by shareholders for
election of a director may be submitted to an annual meeting or
at a meeting called for the purpose of appointing a director
provided that they are signed by holders of not less than 5% of
the issued and outstanding shares that carry a right to vote, or
not less than 5% of the issued and outstanding shares of a class
of shares entitled to vote at the meeting, and are submitted at
least 60 days before the anniversary date of the last
annual meeting.
RBC
Under the Bank Act, nominations by shareholders for election of
a director may be submitted to an annual meeting provided that
they are signed by holders of not less than 5% of the issued and
outstanding shares, or not less than 5% of the issued and
outstanding shares of a class of shares entitled to vote at the
meeting, and are submitted at least 90 days before the
anniversary date of the last annual meeting.
Under the RBTT By-laws, Directors may fix the quorum necessary
for the transaction of business and, unless so fixed the quorum
shall be five Directors provided always that, such quorum shall
always be composed of at least three Directors who are not
Executive Directors and, notwithstanding any vacancy among the
Directors, a quorum may exercise all the powers of the
Directors. The RBTT By-laws permit a meeting of the Directors to
be convened at any time by the chairman or any two Directors, or
by the secretary when directed or authorized by the chairman or
any two Directors. The RBTT Articles and RBTT By-laws provide
that at meetings of Directors every matter shall be decided by a
majority of the votes cast on the matter. In the event of an
equality of votes, the chairman of the meeting in addition to
his original vote shall have a second or casting vote.
RBC
Under the Bank Act, the number of directors constituting a
quorum at any meeting of directors or a committee of directors
may never be less than four directors. In addition, under the
Bank Act, the directors of a bank may not transact business at a
meeting of directors (or a committee of directors) unless at
least one director who is not affiliated with the bank is
present and a majority of the directors present are resident
Canadians.
21.5
Removal
of Directors
RBTT
Under the Companies Act, a director may be removed by
shareholders either by ordinary resolution at a special meeting
or where a director was elected for a term exceeding one year
and is not up for re-election at an annual meeting, by ordinary
resolution at that meeting. Under the RBTT By-laws, RBTT
Shareholders may, by ordinary resolution passed at any meeting
of the RBTT Shareholders, remove any Director from office and a
vacancy created by the removal of a Director may be filled at
the meeting of the RBTT Shareholders at which the Director is
removed. An ordinary resolution is a resolution passed by a vote
of not less than a majority of the votes cast by shareholders
who voted in respect of the resolution.
RBC
Under the Bank Act, the shareholders of RBC may by resolution at
a special meeting remove any director or directors from office.
This resolution must be passed by a vote of not less than a
majority of the votes cast by shareholders who voted in respect
of the resolution.
21.6
Filling
Vacancies on the Board of Directors
RBTT
Under the Companies Act, a quorum of the directors may at any
time appoint a person to be a director to fill a casual vacancy
among the directors, or as an addition to the existing
directors, provided that the total number of directors shall not
exceed the maximum number of directors authorized by the
articles of a corporation. Any person appointed to be a director
shall hold office only until the next following meeting of the
shareholders of a corporation and such person shall then be
eligible for re-election.
RBC
Under the Bank Act, a quorum of directors may appoint one or
more directors to fill a vacancy among the directors and any
director so appointed will hold office for the unexpired term of
the director’s predecessor in office provided that the
directors may not appoint a person to fill a vacancy resulting
from a change in the RBC By-laws by which the number or minimum
or maximum number of directors is increased or from a failure to
elect the minimum number of directors required by the RBC
By-laws. Under the RBC By-laws, the directors of RBC may
otherwise increase the number of directors and appoint one or
more additional directors who will hold office for a term
expiring not later than the close of the next annual meeting of
shareholders. Under the Bank Act, the total number of additional
directors appointed by the directors may not exceed one-third of
the number of directors elected at the previous annual meeting
of shareholders.
Directors have fiduciary obligations to RBTT. Under the
Companies Act, directors must act honestly and in good faith
with a view to the best interests of the corporation, and must
exercise the care, diligence and skill that a reasonably prudent
person would exercise in comparable circumstances. In
determining the best interests of the corporation, a director
shall have regard to the interests of the corporation’s
employees in general as well as to the interests of its
shareholders.
RBC
Directors of RBC have fiduciary obligations to RBC. Under the
Bank Act, directors must act honestly and in good faith with a
view to the best interests of the corporation, and must exercise
the care, diligence and skill that a reasonably prudent person
would exercise in comparable circumstances. In addition,
directors are obliged to comply with the Bank Act, its
regulations and the RBC By-laws.
21.8
Exculpation
of Liability
RBTT
Under the Companies Act, a corporation may not, by contract,
resolution or by-law, limit the liability of its directors for
breaches of their duty to act in accordance with the Companies
Act. However, a director will not be held liable under the
Companies Act if he or she relies in good faith on financial
statements represented to him or her by an officer of the
corporation or a report of an
attorney-at-law,
accountant, engineer, appraiser or other person whose profession
lends credibility to a statement made by him or her.
RBC
Under the Bank Act, RBC may not, by contract, resolution or
by-law, limit the liability of its directors for breaches of
their duty to act in accordance with the Bank Act. However,
under the Bank Act, directors and officers are not liable in
respect of certain of their duties imposed under the Bank Act,
including their duty of care, if they relied in good faith on
financial statements represented to the directors or officers by
an officer of RBC or RBC’s auditors to reflect fairly the
financial condition of RBC or on a report of a person whose
profession lends credibility to a statement made by the
professional.
21.9
Voting
Rights
RBTT
Under the RBTT Articles, the vote of a majority of shares voted
on any matter, including the election of Directors, at a meeting
of RBTT Shareholders at which a quorum is present is the act of
such RBTT Shareholders on the matter, unless the vote of a
greater number is required under the Companies Act. Pursuant to
the RBTT By-laws, at least three RBTT Shareholders or
proxyholders present in person and holding in person or by proxy
not less than 10% of the shares entitled to vote at the meeting
constitute a quorum at a meeting of RBTT Shareholders.
RBC
Under the Bank Act, if voting rights are attached to any share
of a bank, the voting rights may confer only one vote in respect
of that share. The RBC By-laws provide that ten or more
shareholders of RBC present in person at a shareholders meeting
and entitled to vote there shall constitute a quorum at any
shareholders meeting of RBC. However, where the provisions
relating to a class or series of shares provide for the quorum
for meetings of the holders of shares of such class or series,
such provisions apply. Except as required under the Bank Act and
as provided in the RBC By-laws, the holders of First Preferred
Shares and Second Preferred Shares shall not have any voting
rights for the election of directors of RBC or for any other
purpose, nor shall they be entitled to receive any notice of or
attend shareholders’ meetings.
21.10
Interest
in Material Contracts or Transactions
RBTT
Under the Companies Act and the RBTT By-laws, no material
contract between RBTT and one or more of its Directors or
officers or between RBTT and another entity of which a Director
or officer of RBTT is a director or officer or in which one or
more of the Directors or officers of RBTT has a material
interest, is void or voidable as a result solely of that
relationship or solely because that Director is present at or is
counted to determine the presence of a quorum at a meeting of
directors or a committee of directors that authorized the
material contract if (i) the Director or officer disclosed
the
interest; (ii) the contract was approved by the directors
or shareholders; and (iii) the contract was reasonable and
fair to RBTT at the time the contract was approved. The
Companies Act also contains additional restrictions on
transactions between RBTT and Directors and senior officers of
RBTT.
RBC
Under the Bank Act, no material contract or transaction between
RBC and one or more of its directors or officers or between RBC
and another party of which a director or officer of RBC is a
director or officer or in which one or more of its directors or
officers has a material interest, is invalid and no director or
officer is accountable to RBC or its shareholders for any profit
realized from it by reason only of the director’s or
officer’s interest in the contract or transaction or the
fact that such director is present at or is counted to determine
the presence of a quorum at a meeting of directors or a
committee of directors that considered it if: (i) the
director or officer disclosed the interest; (ii) the
contract or transaction was approved by the directors; and
(iii) the contract or transaction was reasonable and fair
to RBC at the time the contract was approved.
Under the Bank Act, all transactions between RBC and its
directors and senior officers must, except in specified limited
circumstances, be on terms and conditions at least as favourable
to RBC as market terms and conditions. The Bank Act also
contains additional restrictions on transactions between RBC and
its directors and senior officers.
21.11
Amendments
to Governing Documents
RBTT
Under the Companies Act, any amendment to the articles of a
corporation generally requires approval by special resolution. A
special resolution is a resolution passed at a meeting of the
corporation by not less than 75% of the votes cast by the
shareholders who voted in respect of the resolution. The
Companies Act provides that unless the articles otherwise
provide, the shareholders may, by special resolution, make,
amend or repeal the articles that regulate the business or
affairs of a corporation. The holders of shares of a class of
shares are entitled to vote separately, as a class, upon a
proposal to amend the articles of the corporation. If a series
is affected by an amendment in a manner different from other
shares of the same class, the holders of a series of shares of a
class are entitled to vote separately as a series.
Under the Companies Act and as provided by the RBTT Articles,
the board of directors of RBTT may adopt, amend or repeal the
RBTT By-laws. Additionally, a shareholder entitled to vote at an
annual meeting of shareholders of RBTT is entitled to make a
proposal to make, amend or repeal a by-law in accordance with
the shareholder proposal requirements of the Companies Act.
RBC
Under the Bank Act, any amendment to a bank’s incorporating
instrument requires approval by special resolution. This
resolution must be passed by a vote of not less than two-thirds
of the votes cast by shareholders who voted in respect of the
resolution. Any amendment to a bank’s incorporating
instrument also requires the approval of the Minister of Finance.
The RBC Board of Directors may, by resolution, make, amend or
repeal any RBC By-laws that regulate the business or affairs of
RBC. Any change to the RBC By-laws made by the RBC Board of
Directors remains in effect until it is approved or rejected by
the shareholders by a majority of the votes cast at the next
meeting of shareholders following the change. Certain changes of
a substantial nature to the RBC By-laws must be approved by
special resolution of the shareholders before going into effect.
This resolution must be passed by a vote of not less than
two-thirds of the votes cast by shareholders who voted in
respect of the resolution. Certain changes entitle the holders
of each class of shares (and each series of a class, if the
shares of that series are affected differently by the amendment
from other shares of that class) to vote separately as a class
or series, with each share carrying the right to vote whether or
not it otherwise carries the right to vote. Substantial by-law
changes requiring approval by special resolution include, but
are not limited to, creating new classes of shares, changing the
designation or attributes of any class or series of shares,
dividing any class of shares into series, increasing or
decreasing the number of directors (including the maximum or
minimum number of directors), changing the place in Canada where
RBC’s head office is situated or changing the name of the
bank. The Superintendent must also approve any change in the
name of the bank.
A shareholder entitled to vote at an annual meeting of
shareholders of RBC may make a proposal to make, amend or repeal
a by-law in accordance with the shareholder proposal
requirements of the Bank Act.
Under the Companies Act, certain extraordinary corporate
actions, such as an amalgamation (other than with a direct or
indirect wholly-owned subsidiary), sale, lease or exchange of
all or substantially all the property of a corporation other
than in the ordinary course of business or liquidation and
dissolution are required to be approved by a special resolution
passed by a vote of not less than three-quarters of the votes
cast by shareholders who voted in respect of the resolution. In
certain cases, a special resolution to approve an extraordinary
corporate action is also required to be approved separately by
the holders of a class or series of shares, including in certain
cases a class or series of shares not otherwise carrying voting
rights.
RBC
Under the Bank Act, RBC may sell all or substantially all its
assets to another financial institution incorporated in Canada
or to an authorized foreign bank in respect of its business in
Canada provided that the purchaser assumes all or substantially
all of the liabilities of the bank. The sale must also be
approved by the shareholders by special resolution passed by a
vote of not less than two-thirds of the votes cast by
shareholders who voted in respect of the resolution, with each
share carrying the right to vote whether or not it otherwise
carries the right to vote. The holders of each class or series
of shares which is affected differently by the transaction from
the shares of any other class or series are entitled to vote
separately as a class or series. The Minister of Finance must
also approve the sale of all or substantially all the assets of
RBC.
Under the Bank Act, certain other extraordinary corporate
actions require authorization by special resolution of the
shareholders. Such a resolution must be passed by a vote of not
less than two-thirds of the votes cast by shareholders who voted
in respect of the resolution. These extraordinary corporate
actions include amalgamations (other than an amalgamation
between a bank and a wholly-owned subsidiary of that bank),
continuances, liquidations and dissolutions. In certain of these
extraordinary corporate actions, each share carries the right to
vote on the relevant resolution whether or not it otherwise
carries the right to vote. In addition, certain extraordinary
corporate actions entitle the holders of each class of shares
(and each series of a class, if the shares of that series are
affected differently by the action from other shares of that
class) to vote separately as a class or series on the relevant
resolution.
21.13
Shareholder
Meetings
RBTT
Under the Companies Act and the RBTT By-laws, the Directors must
call an annual meeting of shareholders not later than
15 months after the holding of the last preceding annual
meeting. If for any reason it is impracticable to call a meeting
or to conduct a meeting in the manner in which it is otherwise
to be called or as prescribed by the RBTT By-laws or the
Companies Act, any Director or shareholder entitled to vote at
that meeting may apply to a court for an order calling the
meeting and setting forth the manner to hold and conduct the
meeting. Under the RBTT By-laws, a special meeting of the
shareholders may be called by the Directors at any date and time
and at any place within Trinidad and Tobago.
Under the Companies Act, the holders of not less than 5% of the
issued shares of a corporation that carry the right to vote at
the meeting sought to be held may requisition the directors to
call a meeting of shareholders. Upon meeting the requirements
set out in the Companies Act for making such a requisition, the
directors of the corporation must call a meeting of
shareholders. If the directors do not call a meeting within
21 days after receiving the requisition, any shareholder
who signed the requisition requesting the directors to call the
meeting may call the meeting.
RBC
Under the Bank Act and the RBC By-laws, annual meetings of the
shareholders of RBC are to be held within six months after the
end of RBC’s financial year at a time and place within
Canada determined by the board of directors. If for any reason
it is impracticable to call a meeting or to conduct a meeting in
the manner in which it is otherwise to be called or as
prescribed by the RBC By-laws or the Bank Act, any director or
shareholder entitled to vote at that meeting may apply to a
court for an order calling the meeting and setting forth the
manner to hold and conduct the meeting.
Under the Bank Act, special meetings of shareholders may be
called at any time by the RBC Board of Directors. In addition,
subject to certain provisions of the Bank Act, the holders of
not less than 5% of the issued and outstanding shares of RBC
that carry the right to vote at the meeting may request that the
directors call a meeting of shareholders for the
purpose stated in the request. If the directors do not call a
meeting within 21 days after receiving the requisition, any
shareholder who signed the requisition requesting the directors
to call the meeting may call the meeting.
21.14
Quorum
of Shareholders
RBTT
The Companies Act permits a corporation to establish by by-law
the quorum requirement for meetings of shareholders. The RBTT
By-laws provide that a quorum for the transaction of business at
any meeting of the RBTT Shareholders shall be such number of
members present in person or by proxy being not less than 10 or
such lesser number (not being less than three) who represent
shareholders having at least 10% of the issued shares of RBTT
entitled to vote.
RBC
The Bank Act permits a bank to establish by by-law the quorum
requirement for meetings of shareholders. Under the RBC By-laws,
10 or more RBC Shareholders present in person and entitled to
vote shall constitute a quorum at any meeting of the RBC
Shareholders. The RBC By-laws further provide that where the
provisions relating to a class or series of shares of RBC
provide for the quorum for meetings of the holders of shares of
such class or series, such quorum provisions shall apply.
21.15
Shareholder
Proposal Procedures
RBTT
Under the Companies Act, an RBTT Shareholder entitled to vote at
an annual meeting of shareholders may submit a proposal to RBTT.
A proposal that includes nominations for Directors must be
signed by RBTT Shareholders who, together with the RBTT
Shareholder who submitted the proposal, are registered owners of
at least 5% of the shares of RBTT that carry the right to vote,
or at least 5% of a class of shares of RBTT that carry the right
to vote. RBTT must set out the proposal in its management proxy
circular or attach the proposal to the management proxy
circular, if it is soliciting proxies, and must, if requested by
the RBTT Shareholder, include in the management proxy circular
or attach to the management proxy circular a statement of not
more than 200 words by the shareholder in support of the
proposal. Generally, to be timely, the proposal must be received
by RBTT at least 60 days before the anniversary date of the
previous annual meeting of RBTT Shareholders. If RBTT refuses to
include a proposal in a management proxy circular for any of the
reasons permitted by the Companies Act (including the failure to
deliver the proposal before the Directors send out notice of an
annual general meeting in accordance with the Companies Act),
RBTT is not required to submit the proposal to RBTT
Shareholders, but must notify the shareholder submitting the
proposal within 10 days after receiving the proposal of its
intention to omit the proposal and give reasons in writing for
so doing. An RBTT Shareholder claiming to be aggrieved by such a
refusal may apply to a court, which may order that RBTT include
the proposal at its annual meeting and make any further order it
thinks fit. RBTT or any person claiming to be aggrieved by a
proposal may apply to court to exclude the proposal and the
court may make such order as it thinks fit.
RBC
Under the Bank Act, an RBC Shareholder entitled to vote at an
annual meeting of shareholders that has held the prescribed
number of shares for the prescribed period or who has the
support of persons who have held the prescribed number of shares
for the prescribed period may submit a proposal to RBC. A
proposal that includes nominations for directors must be signed
by RBC Shareholders who, together with the RBC Shareholder who
submits the proposal, are registered owners of at least 5% of
the shares of RBC, or at least 5% of a class of the shares of
RBC that carry the right to vote. RBC must set out the proposal
in its management proxy circular or attach the proposal to the
management proxy circular, if it is soliciting proxies, and
must, if requested by the RBC Shareholder, include in the
management proxy circular or attach to the circular a statement
of not more than 500 words by the RBC Shareholder in support of
the proposal. Generally, to be timely, the proposal must be
received by RBC at least 90 days before the anniversary
date of the notice of meeting of the previous annual meeting of
RBC Shareholders. If RBC refuses to include a proposal in a
management proxy circular for any of the reasons permitted by
the Bank Act (including the failure to deliver the proposal at
least 90 days before the anniversary date of the previous
annual meeting of shareholders in accordance with the Bank Act),
RBC is not required to submit the proposal to the RBC
Shareholders, but must notify the RBC Shareholder submitting the
proposal within 21 days after receiving the proposal of its
intention to omit the proposal and give a statement of the
reasons for the refusal. An RBC Shareholder claiming to be
aggrieved by such a refusal may apply to a court, which may
restrain the holding of the meeting at which the proposal is
sought to be presented and make any further order it thinks fit.
RBC or any person
claiming to be aggrieved by a proposal may apply to court to
exclude the proposal and the court may make such order as it
thinks fit.
21.16
Shareholder
Action Without a Meeting
RBTT
Under the Companies Act, shareholder action may be taken without
a meeting by written resolution signed by all shareholders who
would be entitled to vote on the matter at a meeting except with
respect to a meeting called for the purpose of (1) removing
a director or the auditor of a corporation or (2) electing
or appointing a director or auditor of a corporation following
the resignation, removal or expiration of the term of office of
a director or auditor of a corporation where, in either case,
the director or auditor has submitted a written statement giving
the reasons why he opposes the proposed action or resolution.
RBC
Under the Bank Act, shareholder action may be taken without a
meeting by written resolution signed by all shareholders who
would be entitled to vote on the matter at a meeting except with
respect to a meeting called for the purpose of (1) removing
a director or the auditor of RBC or (2) electing or
appointing a director or auditor of RBC following the
resignation, removal or expiration of the term of office of a
director or auditor of RBC where, in either case, the director
or auditor has submitted a written statement giving the reasons
why he opposes the proposed action or resolution.
21.17
Shareholders’
Right to Examine Books and Records
RBTT
Under the Companies Act, RBTT is required to make available to
RBTT Shareholders and their agents and legal representatives,
specified books and records during usual business hours of RBTT.
These persons may take extracts from these books and records. An
RBTT Shareholder is, upon request and without charge, entitled
to one copy of the RBTT Articles and the RBTT By-laws, and to
one copy of any amendments to any of those documents. The
Companies Act also requires that specified books and records be
kept at RBTT’s registered office (which office is required
to be in Trinidad and Tobago). Where a list of RBTT Shareholders
has been prepared by RBTT, an RBTT Shareholder may also examine
the same, during usual business hours at the registered office
of RBTT or at the place where its register of RBTT Shareholders
is maintained; and at the meeting of RBTT Shareholders for which
the list was prepared.
RBC
Under the Bank Act, RBC is required to make available to its
shareholders and creditors and their personal representatives,
specified books and records during usual business hours of RBC.
These persons may take extracts from these books and records
free of charge or have copies made upon payment of a reasonable
fee. If RBC has distributed securities to the public, any other
person may examine, take extracts from, or make copies of, these
books and records upon payment of a reasonable fee. An RBC
Shareholder may also obtain a list of RBC Shareholders by paying
a reasonable fee and submitting an affidavit certifying that the
list will only be used for the purposes set out in the Bank Act.
Also, in the case of a bank such as RBC, creditors and their
personal representatives, and any other person, upon payment of
a reasonable fee and submitting an affidavit, may require RBC to
furnish a list of RBC Shareholders. In addition, the RBC Board
of Directors are entitled to examine additional records,
documents and instruments of RBC.
21.18
Pre-emptive
Rights
RBTT
Under the Companies Act, shareholders of a corporation have a
pre-emptive right to acquire shares issued or intended to be
issued by the directors of the corporation unless the articles
of the corporation provide otherwise. Under the RBTT Articles,
the pre-emptive right provided for in the Companies Act does not
apply to RBTT Shareholders.
RBC
The Bank Act provides that shareholders may have a pre-emptive
right if this right is specifically provided in the bank’s
by-laws. The RBC By-laws do not provide for pre-emptive rights.
Under the Companies Act, RBTT will furnish to holders of RBTT
Ordinary Shares at every annual meeting, audited annual reports
containing comparative financial statements, with an opinion
thereon by RBTT’s external auditors. RBTT also files with
the TTSEC, at a minimum, semi-annual reports containing
unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial information.
RBC
Under the Bank Act and applicable securities legislation, RBC is
required to furnish to holders of RBC Common Shares at every
annual meeting, annual reports containing audited consolidated
financial statements prepared in accordance with Canadian GAAP,
with such changes as may be specified by the Superintendent,
with an opinion thereon by RBC’s external auditors, and
quarterly reports containing unaudited interim consolidated
financial information prepared in accordance with Canadian GAAP.
RBC is also required to file interim and audited annual
financial statements with the applicable securities regulatory
authorities.
21.20
Stock
Repurchases
RBTT
Under the Companies Act, RBTT may redeem or purchase its shares
for cancellation unless there are reasonable grounds for
believing that (a) RBTT is unable or would, after that
payment, be unable to pay its liabilities as they become due; or
(b) the realizable value of RBTT’s assets would, after
that payment, be less than the aggregate of its liabilities and
stated capital of all classes.
RBC
Under the RBC By-laws, RBC Common Shares are non-redeemable.
Under the Bank Act, RBC may, with the prior consent of the
Superintendent, purchase its shares for cancellation unless
there are reasonable grounds for believing that RBC is, or the
purchase would cause RBC to be, in contravention of any
regulation made under the Bank Act regarding the maintenance by
banks of adequate capital and adequate and appropriate forms of
liquidity, or any direction to RBC made by the Superintendent
pursuant to section 485(3) of the Bank Act regarding its capital
or liquidity.
21.21
Restrictions
on Related Party Transactions
RBTT
In Trinidad and Tobago, the Securities Industry Act and the
Take-Over By-laws contain requirements in connection with
“insider” bids. An insider bid means, generally, a
take-over bid by: (i) an insider of the corporation whose
securities are the subject of the bid; or (ii) an associate
or affiliate of an insider of the corporation whose securities
are the subject of the bid.
An “insider” is defined in the Securities Industry Act
and includes a director, officer or employee of a corporation, a
person who beneficially owns more than 10% of the equity
securities of a corporation or who exercises control or
direction over more than 10% of the votes attached to the
securities of a corporation and any other person whose
relationship to the corporation gives him access to a material
confidential fact.
The Take-Over By-laws require, in respect of insider bids and
subject to certain exceptions: (i) a summary of a formal
valuation of the securities of the corporation that are the
subject of the bid as prepared by a qualified and independent
valuator; and (ii) an outline of every prior valuation of
the corporation made within a specified time period.
RBC
The Bank Act prohibits RBC from entering into any transaction
with a related party unless the form of transaction is
specifically permitted under the Bank Act. Permitted
transactions must generally be on terms and conditions at least
as favourable to RBC as market terms and conditions. Under the
Bank Act, related parties include the directors and senior
officers of RBC and their spouses and minor children and other
entities with which they may have a relationship.
Additionally, rules and policies of certain Canadian securities
regulatory authorities, including
Rule 61-501
of the Ontario Securities Commission and Policy Statement Q-27
of the Autorité des marchés financiers of Québec,
contain requirements in connection with “related party
transactions.”
A related party transaction means, generally, any transaction by
which an issuer (including RBC) directly or indirectly:
(i) acquires, sells, leases or transfers an asset;
(ii) acquires or issues treasury securities;
(iii) assumes or transfers a liability; or
(iv) borrows money or lends money; from or to, as the case
may be, a related party by any means in any one or any
combination of transactions.
“Related Party” is defined in
Rule 61-501
and Policy Statement Q-27 and includes directors, senior
officers and holders of more than 10% of the voting rights
attached to all outstanding voting securities of the issuer or
holders of a sufficient number of any securities of the issuer
to materially affect control of the issuer.
Rule 61-501
and Policy Statement Q-27 require, subject to certain
exceptions: (i) more detailed disclosure in the proxy
material sent to security holders in connection with a related
party transaction; (ii) the preparation of a formal
valuation of: (A) non-cash assets involved in a related
party transaction (pursuant to
Rule 61-501);
and (B) the subject matter of the related party transaction
and any non-cash consideration offered for the subject matter
(pursuant to Policy
Statement Q-27);
and (iii) inclusion of a summary of the valuation in the
proxy material.
Rule 61-501
and Policy Statement Q-27 also require, subject to certain
exceptions, that an issuer not engage in a related party
transaction unless the shareholders of the issuer, other than
the related parties, approve the transaction by a simple
majority of the votes cast.
21.22
Dissent
Rights
RBTT
The Companies Act provides that shareholders of a corporation
governed by the Companies Act who are entitled to vote on
certain matters are entitled to exercise dissent rights and to
be paid the fair value of their shares in connection with the
exercise of these rights. Such matters include: (i) any
amalgamation with another corporation (other than with certain
affiliated corporations); (ii) an amendment to the
corporation’s articles to add, change or remove any
restriction upon the business or businesses that the corporation
may carry on; (iii) an amendment to the corporation’s
articles to add, change or remove any provisions restricting or
constraining the issue or transfer of shares of that class;
(iv) a sale, lease or exchange of all or substantially all
the property of the corporation other than in the ordinary
course of business; or (v) an amalgamation, the terms of
which permit a shareholder to dissent in connection with such
amalgamation.
Under the Companies Act, a shareholder may, in addition to
exercising dissent rights, seek an oppression remedy for any act
or omission of a corporation which is oppressive or unfairly
prejudicial to a shareholder’s interests.
RBC
The only circumstances under which the Bank Act extends
appraisal or dissent rights to shareholders are (i) in
respect of a compulsory acquisition of shares following a
takeover bid pursuant to which an acquirer has acquired not less
than 90% of the shares of the class that were the subject of the
bid, or (ii) in respect of a going private transaction. Due
to the ownership restrictions applicable to RBC under the Bank
Act, the shares of RBC may not be the subject to either such
transactions.
21.23
Oppression
Remedy
RBTT
The Companies Act provides an oppression remedy that enables a
court to make any order, both interim and final, to rectify the
matters complained of if the court is satisfied upon application
by a complainant (as defined below) that the application was
brought in a timely manner, and that: (i) any act or
omission of the corporation or any of its affiliates effects a
result; (ii) the affairs of the corporation or any of its
affiliates are or have been conducted in a manner; or
(iii) the powers of the directors of the corporation are or
have been exercised in a manner, that is oppressive or unfairly
prejudicial to the interest of any shareholder of the
corporation.
A complainant includes a shareholder or debenture holder, or a
former holder of a share or debenture of a corporation or any of
its affiliates, a director or an officer or former director or
officer of a corporation or any of its affiliates (including
creditors), the Registrar or any other person who in the
discretion of the court is a proper person to make such
application.
RBC
The Bank Act does not have a similar oppression remedy provision.
Under the Companies Act, certain persons, including a
shareholder, may apply to the applicable court for leave to
bring an action under the Companies Act in the name and on
behalf of a corporation or any of its subsidiaries, or intervene
in an action to which any such corporation or any of its
subsidiaries is a party. Under the Companies Act, no action may
be brought, and no intervention in an action may be made unless
the court is satisfied that: (i) the person has given
reasonable notice to the directors of the corporation or its
subsidiary of his intention to apply to the court if the
directors of the corporation or its subsidiary do not bring,
diligently prosecute or defend, or discontinue, the action;
(ii) the person is acting in good faith; and (iii) it
appears to be in the interests of the corporation or its
subsidiary that the action be brought, prosecuted, defended or
discontinued.
Under the Companies Act, the court in a derivative action may
make any order it thinks fit. Additionally, under the Companies
Act, a court may order a corporation or its subsidiary to pay
reasonable legal fees incurred by the person in connection with
the action.
RBC
Under the Bank Act, certain persons, including a shareholder,
may apply to the applicable court for leave to bring an action
under the Bank Act in the name of and on behalf of a bank or any
subsidiary, or to intervene in an existing action under the Bank
Act to which the bank or a subsidiary is a party, for the
purpose of prosecuting, defending or discontinuing the action on
behalf of the bank or the subsidiary. Under the Bank Act, no
action may be brought and no intervention in an action may be
made unless the court is satisfied that: (i) the person has
given reasonable notice to the directors of the bank or its
subsidiary of the person’s intention to apply to the court
if the directors of the bank or its subsidiary do not bring,
diligently prosecute or defend or discontinue the action;
(ii) the person is acting in good faith; and (iii) it
appears to be in the interests of the bank or its subsidiary
that the action be brought, prosecuted, defended or discontinued.
Under the Bank Act, the court in a derivative action may make
any order it thinks fit, except that the court may not make any
order in relation to any matter that would require the approval
of the Minister of Finance or the Superintendent under the Bank
Act. Additionally, under the Bank Act a court may order a bank
or its subsidiary to pay reasonable legal fees incurred by the
person in connection with the action.
21.25
Indemnification
of Officers and Directors
RBTT
Under the Companies Act, RBTT may indemnify a Director or
officer, a former Director or officer, or a person who acts or
acted at RBTT’s request as a director or officer of a
corporation of which RBTT is or was a shareholder or creditor,
or his personal representatives, against all costs, charges and
expenses (including an amount paid to settle an action or
satisfy a judgment) reasonably incurred by him or her in respect
of any civil, criminal or administrative action or proceeding to
which he or she is made a party by reason of being, or having
been, a Director or officer of RBTT or that corporation, if
(i) he or she acted honestly and in good faith with a view
to the best interests of RBTT and (ii) in the case of a
proceeding other than a civil proceeding, he or she had
reasonable grounds for believing that his or her conduct was
lawful. The RBTT By-laws provide for indemnification of
Directors and officers in accordance with the foregoing
provisions of the Companies Act. In addition, under the
Companies Act, an indemnifiable person as described above is
entitled to such indemnity from RBTT if he or she was
substantially successful on the merits in his or her defence of
the action or proceeding and fulfilled the conditions set out in
(i) and (ii) above. RBTT may, with the approval of a
court, also indemnify such person regarding an action by or on
behalf of RBTT or that corporation to procure a judgment in its
favour, to which the person is made a party by reason of being
or having been a director or officer of RBTT or that
corporation, if he or she fulfills the conditions set out in
(i) and (ii) above.
The Companies Act further states that RBTT shall have the power
to purchase and maintain insurance on behalf of any person who
is or was a Director or officer of RBTT, or a person who acts or
acted at RBTT’s request as a director or officer of a
corporation, against any liability asserted against such person
and incurred by such person in any such capacity, or arising out
of such person’s status as such, if he or she fulfills the
conditions set out in (i) and (ii) above.
RBC
Under the RBC By-laws and as provided in the Bank Act, RBC will
indemnify a director or officer, a former director or officer or
a person who acts or acted at RBC’s request as a director
or officer of an entity of which the bank is or was a
shareholder or creditor, and his or her heirs and legal
representatives, against all costs, charges and expenses,
including an amount paid to settle an action or satisfy a
judgment, reasonably incurred by him or her because of any
civil, criminal, administrative, investigative or other
proceeding to which he or she is made a party by reason of being
or having been a director or officer of RBC or such entity, if:
(1) that person acted honestly and in good faith with a
view to the best interests of RBC; and (2) in the case of a
criminal, administrative, investigative or other proceeding that
is enforced by a monetary penalty, that person had reasonable
grounds for believing that his or her impugned conduct was
lawful.
Under the RBC By-laws, RBC has indemnified its directors and
officers to the full extent permitted by the Bank Act. RBC may,
with the approval of a court, also indemnify such person
regarding an action by or on behalf of the bank or entity to
procure a judgment in its favour, to which the person is made a
party by reason of being or having been a director or officer of
the corporation or entity, if he or she fulfills the conditions
set out in (1) and (2) above.
The Bank Act further states that RBC shall have the power to
purchase and maintain insurance on behalf of any person who is
or was a director or officer of the corporation, or a person who
acts or acted at the bank’s request as a director or
officer of an entity, against any liability asserted against
such person and incurred by such person in any such capacity, or
arising out of such person’s status as such, if he or she
fulfills the conditions set out in (1) and (2) above.
21.26
Dividends
and Other Distributions
RBTT
Under the Companies Act, RBTT is prohibited from declaring or
paying dividends on its preferred or ordinary shares if there
are reasonable grounds for believing that either (i) RBTT
is unable, or would, after the payment, be unable, to pay its
liabilities as they become due; or (ii) the realizable
value of the RBTT’s assets would thereby be less than the
aggregate of its liabilities and stated capital of all classes.
The RBTT By-laws provide that, subject to the Companies Act,
dividends on outstanding shares may be declared by the RBTT
directors and may be paid by the distribution of specific assets
and in particular of shares, debentures or debenture stock of
RBTT, or the shares, debentures or debenture stock of any other
corporation.
RBC
Under the Bank Act, RBC is prohibited from declaring dividends
on its preferred or common shares if there are reasonable
grounds for believing that RBC is, or the payment would cause
RBC to be, in contravention of the capital adequacy and
liquidity regulations of the Bank Act or any capital or
liquidity directions of the Superintendent. RBC does not
anticipate that these conditions will restrict it from paying
dividends in the normal course of business. The Bank Act
provides that dividends on outstanding shares may be declared by
the RBC directors and may be paid in money or property.
RBC is also restricted from paying dividends on its preferred or
common shares in the event that either of its subsidiaries that
have issued capital trust securities fails to pay semi-annual
distributions in full to holders of their capital trust
securities. In addition, the ability to pay dividends on
RBC’s common shares without the approval of the holders of
the outstanding preferred shares is restricted unless all
dividends on the preferred shares have been declared and paid or
set apart for payment. Currently, these limitations do not
restrict the payment of dividends on preferred or common shares.
21.27
Voluntary
Dissolution
RBTT
The Companies Act permits a corporation to be dissolved:
(i) when the period fixed for the duration of the
corporation by its articles expires (if any) or an event occurs,
on the occurrence of which, the articles provide that the
corporation is to be dissolved (if any), and the corporation has
passed an ordinary resolution requiring the corporation to be
dissolved; (ii) if a general meeting so resolves by special
resolution; or (iii) if the corporation resolves by
ordinary resolution that it cannot by reason of its liabilities
continue its business, and that it is advisable to wind up.
RBC
The Bank Act provides that RBC may apply to the Minister of
Finance for letters patent dissolving the bank if authorized by
special resolution of each class of shareholders whether or not
those shareholders are otherwise entitled to vote.
Certain legal matters in connection with the Amalgamation will
be passed on by M.G. Daly & Partners,
Port-of-Spain,
Trinidad and Tobago, on behalf of RBTT. As at the date of the
Circular, partners and associates of M.G. Daly &
Partners owned beneficially, directly or indirectly, less than
1% of the outstanding RBTT Ordinary Shares. Certain legal
matters in connection with the Amalgamation will be passed on by
Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt LLP, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
and Pollonais, Blanc, De La Bastide & Jacelon on
behalf of RBC. As at the date of the Circular, partners and
associates of Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt LLP and
Pollonais, Blanc, De La Bastide & Jacelon owned
beneficially, directly or indirectly, less than 1% of the
outstanding RBC Common Shares, respectively.
22.2
Enforceability
of Civil Liabilities
RBC is a Canadian chartered bank. Substantial portions of the
assets of RBC are located outside of Trinidad and Tobago. As a
result, it may be difficult for RBTT Shareholders to realize in
Canada upon judgments against RBC obtained in Canadian courts.
In addition, awards of punitive damages in actions brought in
Canada or elsewhere may be unenforceable.
22.3
Where
You Can Find Information
RBC is subject to the continuous disclosure requirements of
Canadian securities legislation and the TSX and in accordance
therewith files reports, statements and other information with
the Canadian securities administrators. A copy of RBC’s
2007 annual information form is attached as Appendix
“H” to the Circular. Copies of RBC’s publicly
filed documents may be obtained from the Canadian System for
Electronic Document Analysis and Retrieval at
“www.sedar.com”. Copies of RBC’s annual report
and the relevant portion of any documents incorporated by
reference in the annual report, and copies of RBC’s interim
financial statements, may also be obtained upon request from
Investor Relations at 200 Bay Street, 14th Floor, South Tower,
Toronto, Ontario, M5J 2J5
(416-955-7802)
or on RBC’s website (“www.rbc.com”). RBC’s
unaudited financial statements for the three-month period ended
January 31, 2008 will be filed in accordance with Canadian
securities law requirements on or about February 29, 2008 and
will be available on RBC’s website
(“www.rbc.com”).
RBC is subject to the disclosure requirements of the U.S.
Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 and in accordance therewith
files reports, statements and other information with the SEC.
The reports, statements and other information filed by RBC with
the SEC can be inspected and copied at the public reference
facilities maintained by the SEC at Room 1024,
450 Fifth Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20549. Copies of
such material also can be obtained from the Public Reference
Section of the SEC at Judiciary Plaza, 450 Fifth Street,
N.W., Washington, D.C. 20549 at prescribed rates. RBC’s
public filings in the United States are also available to the
public from commercial document retrieval services and at the
website maintained by the SEC at “www.sec.gov”. You
may also inspect and copy RBC’s public filings at the
offices of the NYSE located at 20 Broad Street, 16th Floor,
New York, New York10005.
RBTT is subject to the continuous disclosure requirements of
(i) securities legislation in Trinidad and Tobago, Jamaica
and Barbados and (ii) the RBTT Exchanges. Copies of
RBTT’s annual report, annual and interim financial
statements, as well as additional copies of the Circular, may be
obtained upon request from the Manager, Shareholder Relations
(1-868-623-1322
ext. 2406) or on RBTT’s website
(“www.rbtt.com”).
22.4
Approval
of the Directors
The contents of the Circular and its sending to RBTT
Shareholders have been approved by the Directors.
The amalgamation of RBTT Financial Holdings Limited
(“RBTT”) and RBC Holdings (Trinidad &
Tobago) Limited (“RBC Holdings (Trinidad &
Tobago)”), as more particularly described and set out
in the Directors’ Circular (“Circular”) of
RBTT dated February 8, 2008 accompanying the notice of this
meeting, is hereby authorized and approved;
2.
The form of Amalgamation Agreement (“Amalgamation
Agreement”) between RBTT, Royal Bank of Canada
(“RBC”) and RBC Holdings (Trinidad &
Tobago) attached as Appendix “E” to the Circular,
and the transactions contemplated thereby, as the board of
directors of RBTT (“Directors”) may from time
to time approve, is hereby authorized and approved;
3.
Notwithstanding that this resolution has been passed, the
Directors are hereby authorized and empowered to amend the
Amalgamation Agreement to the extent permitted by the
Combination Agreement made October 1, 2007 between RBTT and
RBC, as amended and restated as of January 22, 2008, as
further amended, modified or supplemented from time to time in
accordance with its terms; and
4.
Any two Directors or two Executive Officers (“Executive
Officers”) of RBTT are hereby authorized and directed,
for and on behalf of RBTT, to execute and deliver all documents,
agreements, instruments or notices, with or without corporate
seal affixed, and to perform all other acts that such Directors
or Executive Officers may deem necessary or advisable to give
effect to this resolution, including, without limitation, the
execution and delivery of the Articles of Amalgamation in
prescribed form to the Registrar under the Companies Act
(Chap. 81:01 of the Laws of the Republic of Trinidad and
Tobago), as amended, such determination to be conclusively
evidenced by the execution and delivery of any such document,
agreement, instrument, or notice and the performance of any such
act.
You have asked us to advise you with respect to the fairness,
from a financial point of view, to the holders of ordinary
shares, without par value (“Company Ordinary Shares”),
of RBTT Financial Holdings Limited (the “Company”) of
the Per-Share Consideration (as defined below) to be received by
such shareholders pursuant to the terms of the Combination
Agreement, dated October 1, 2007 (the “Combination
Agreement”), between the Company and the Royal Bank of
Canada (the “Acquiror”). The Combination Agreement
provides that the Company and the Acquiror shall enter into an
amalgamation agreement substantially in the form of the
agreement attached to the Combination Agreement as
Schedule “A” (the “Amalgamation
Agreement”) by and among the Company, the Acquiror and
“Newco”, a company to be formed under the laws of
Trinidad and Tobago as a wholly-owned subsidiary of the
Acquiror. The Combination Agreement and the Amalgamation
Agreement provide for, among other things, the amalgamation of
the Company and Newco (the “Amalgamation”) pursuant to
which the amalgamated corporation (the “Corporation”)
will become a wholly owned subsidiary of the Acquiror, and each
Company Ordinary Share will be converted into the right to
receive, subject to certain adjustment, election, redemption and
dissent procedures (as to which we express no opinion),
(i) 24.00 Trinidad & Tobago dollars or, at the
election of a holder of Company Ordinary Shares, the U.S. Dollar
Equivalent (as defined below) (the “Per-Share Cash
Consideration”) and (ii) a number of redeemable
preferred shares of the Corporation (the “Preferred
Shares”) equal to the Collar Exchange Ratio (as defined
below), which Preferred Shares will be automatically converted
into an equivalent number of common shares of the Acquiror (an
“Acquiror Common Share”) immediately following the
Amalgamation (the “Per-Share Stock Consideration” and,
collectively with the Per-Share Cash Consideration, the
“Per-Share Consideration”).
The Amalgamation Agreement provides that the “Collar
Exchange Ratio” will equal the quotient determined by
dividing (i) the U.S. Dollar Equivalent of 16.00
Trinidad & Tobago dollars by (ii) the Adjusted
Average Price. The “Adjusted Average Price” will equal
(x) the volume-weighted average trading price in U.S.
dollars of an Acquiror Common Share on the New York Stock
Exchange as reported by Bloomberg LP during the five-trading-day
period ending on the second business day prior to the
Amalgamation (the “True Average Price”), if the True
Average Price is less than 59.864 U.S. dollars and
greater than 48.980 U.S. dollars, (y) 48.980 U.S. dollars
if the True Average Price is equal to or less than 48.980 U.S.
dollars or (z) 59,864 U.S. dollars if the True Average
Price is equal to or greater than 59.864 U.S. dollars.
The Amalgamation Agreement provides that the “U.S. Dollar
Equivalent” of any amount expressed in Trinidad and Tobago
dollars shall be determined by multiplying such amount by the
simple average of the volume-weighted average buying rate and
the volume-weighted average selling rate for the conversion of
Trinidad and Tobago dollars into U.S. dollars, as reported
by the Central Bank of Trinidad and Tobago for the
five-trading-day period ending on the second business day
immediately preceding the Amalgamation.
In arriving at our opinion, we have reviewed the Combination
Agreement, the Amalgamation Agreement, certain other related
agreements, and certain publicly available business and
financial information relating to the Company and the Acquiror.
We have also reviewed certain other information relating to the
Company and the Acquiror, including financial forecasts relating
to the Company, provided to or discussed with us by the Company,
and certain publicly available financial forecasts relating to
the Acquiror, discussed with us by the Acquiror, and have also
met with the managements of
the Company and the Acquiror to discuss the business and
prospects of the Company. We have also considered certain
financial and stock market data of the Company, and we have
compared such data with similar data for other publicly held
companies in businesses we deemed similar to those of the
Company, and we have considered, to the extent publicly
available, the financial terms of certain other business
combinations and other transactions which have been effected in
recent years. We also considered such other information,
financial studies, analyses and investigations and financial,
economic and market criteria that we deemed relevant.
In connection with our review, we have not assumed any
responsibility for independent verification of any of the
foregoing information and have relied on its being complete and
accurate in all material respects. With respect to the financial
forecasts for the Company that we have reviewed, the management
of the Company has advised us, and we have assumed, that such
forecasts have been reasonably prepared on bases reflecting the
best currently available estimates and judgments of the
management of the Company as to the future financial performance
of the Company. With respect to the publicly available financial
forecasts for the Acquiror referred to above, we have reviewed
and discussed such forecasts with the management of the Acquiror
and have assumed, with your consent, that such forecasts
represent reasonable estimates and judgments with respect to the
future financial performance of the Acquiror. We have assumed,
with your consent, that the Amalgamation Agreement, when
executed, will not differ from the form attached to the
Combination Agreement as Schedule “A” in any way
material to our analysis.
We have assumed, with your consent, that, in the course of
obtaining any regulatory or third party consents, approvals or
agreements in connection with the Amalgamation, no delay,
limitation, restriction or condition will be imposed that would
have an adverse effect on the Company, the Acquiror or the
contemplated benefits of the Amalgamation and that the
Amalgamation will be consummated in accordance with the terms of
the Combination Agreement and the Amalgamation Agreement without
waiver, modification or amendment of any material term,
condition or agreement therein. In addition, we have not been
requested to make, and have not made, an independent evaluation
or appraisal of the assets or liabilities (contingent or
otherwise) of the Company or the Acquiror, nor have we been
furnished with any such evaluations or appraisals. Our opinion
addresses only the fairness, from a financial point of view, to
the holders of Company Ordinary Shares of the Per-Share
Consideration and does not address any other aspect or
implication of the Amalgamation or any other agreement,
arrangement or understanding entered into in connection with the
Amalgamation or otherwise. Our opinion is necessarily based upon
information made available to us as of the date hereof and
financial, economic, market and other conditions as they exist
and can be evaluated on the date hereof. We are not expressing
any opinion as to what the value of the Acquiror Common Shares
actually will be when issued to the holders of Company Ordinary
Shares pursuant to the Amalgamation or the prices at which
Acquiror Common Shares will trade at any time. Our opinion does
not address the relative merits of the Amalgamation as compared
to alternative transactions or strategies that might be
available to the Company, nor does it address the underlying
business decision of the Company to proceed with the
Amalgamation.
We have acted as financial advisor to the Company in connection
with the Amalgamation and will receive a fee for our services, a
significant portion of which is contingent upon the consummation
of the Amalgamation. We will also receive a fee for rendering
this opinion. In addition, the Company has agreed to indemnify
us for certain liabilities and other items arising out of our
engagement. From time to time, we and our affiliates have in the
past provided, are currently providing and in the future may
provide, investment banking and other financial services to the
Company and the Acquiror, for which we have received, and would
expect to receive, compensation. We are a full service
securities firm engaged in securities trading and brokerage
activities as well as providing investment banking and other
financial services. In the ordinary course of business, we and
our affiliates may acquire, hold or sell, for our and our
affiliates’ own accounts and the accounts of customers,
equity, debt and other securities and financial instruments
(including bank loans and other obligations) of the Company, the
Acquiror and any other company that may be involved in the
Amalgamation, as well as provide investment banking and other
financial services to such companies.
It is understood that this letter is solely for the information
of the Board of Directors of the Company in connection with its
consideration of the Amalgamation and does not constitute a
recommendation to any shareholder as to how such shareholder
should vote or act on any matter relating to the proposed
Amalgamation.
Based upon and subject to the foregoing, it is our opinion that,
as of the date hereof, the Per-Share Consideration is fair, from
a financial point of view, to the holders of Company Ordinary
Shares.
RBTT Financial Holdings Limited, a company organized under the
laws of Trinidad and Tobago (the “Company”), Royal
Bank of Canada, a Canadian corporation (the
“Acquiror”), and a newly formed or to be formed
indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of the Acquiror organized under
the laws of Trinidad and Tobago (“Newco”), propose to
enter into an amalgamation agreement (the “Amalgamation
Agreement”). The Amalgamation Agreement would provide for,
among other things, the amalgamation of Newco with the Company
(the “Transaction”), pursuant to which each
outstanding ordinary share in the capital of the Company (the
“Company Shares”) would be converted into the right to
receive TT$24 per Company Share payable in cash and TT$16
(subject to adjustment as described in the Amalgamation
Agreement) per Company Share payable in preferred shares of the
corporation continuing as a result of the amalgamation,
redeemable in exchange for common shares of the Acquiror as
described in the Amalgamation Agreement (the
“Consideration”). Immediately following consummation
of the Transaction, the Acquiror would indirectly, through a
newly formed or to be formed indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of
the Acquiror organized under the laws of Barbados
(“Holdco”), own all of the issued and outstanding
shares of the amalgamated company formed in the Transaction.
You have asked us whether, in our opinion, the Consideration to
be received by the holders of the Company Shares pursuant to the
Transaction is fair from a financial point of view to such
holders.
In arriving at the opinion set forth below, we have, among other
things:
(1)
Reviewed certain publicly available business and financial
information relating to the Company that we deemed to be
relevant;
(2)
Reviewed certain information, including financial forecasts,
relating to the business, earnings, cash flow, assets,
liabilities and prospects of the Company furnished to us by the
Company;
(3)
Conducted discussions with members of senior management and
representatives of the Company concerning the matters described
in clauses 1 and 2 above;
(4)
Reviewed a draft of the Combination Agreement between the
Acquiror and the Company dated September 24, 2007 and a
draft of the Amalgamation Agreement dated September 27,2007 (collectively, the “Transaction Documents”);
(5)
Reviewed historical market prices, trading volume and valuation
multiples for the Company Shares and the common shares of the
Acquiror and compared them with those of certain publicly traded
companies that we deemed to be relevant;
(6)
Reviewed the results of operations of the Company and compared
them with those of certain publicly traded companies that we
deemed to be relevant;
(7)
Compared the proposed financial terms of the Transaction with
the financial terms of certain other transactions that we deemed
to be relevant; and
(8)
Reviewed such other financial studies and analyses and took into
account such other matters as we deemed necessary, including our
assessment of general economic, market and monetary conditions.
In preparing our opinion, we have assumed and relied on the
accuracy and completeness of all information supplied or
otherwise made available to us, discussed with or reviewed by or
for us, or publicly available, and we have not assumed any
responsibility for independently verifying such information or
undertaken an independent evaluation or appraisal of any of the
assets or liabilities of the Company or been furnished with any
such evaluation or appraisal, nor have we evaluated the solvency
or fair value of the Company under any state or federal laws
relating to bankruptcy, insolvency or similar matters. In
addition, we have not assumed any obligation to conduct any
physical inspection of the properties or facilities of the
Company. With respect to the financial forecast information
furnished to or discussed with us by the Company, we have
assumed that they have been reasonably prepared and reflect the
best currently available estimates and judgment of the
Company’s management as to the expected future financial
performance of the Company. We have also assumed that the final
forms of the Transaction Documents will be substantially similar
to the last drafts of the Transaction Documents reviewed by us.
Our opinion is necessarily based upon market, economic and other
conditions as they exist and can be evaluated on, and on the
information made available to us as of, the date hereof, and we
assume no responsibility to update or revise our opinion based
on circumstances or events occurring after the date hereof. We
are not expressing any opinion as to the actual value of the
common shares of the Acquiror or the price at which such shares
will trade at any time.
In connection with the preparation of this opinion, we have not
been authorized by the Company or the Board of Directors of the
Company (the “Board”) to solicit, nor have we
solicited, third-party indications of interest for the
acquisition of all or any part of the Company.
We will receive a fee from the Company for providing this
opinion. In addition, the Company has agreed to indemnify us for
certain liabilities arising out of our engagement. We have, in
the past, provided financial advisory and financing services to
the Acquiror and/or its affiliates and have received fees for
the rendering of such services. We may, in the future, provide
financial advisory and financing services to the Company, the
Acquiror and/or their respective affiliates and may receive fees
for the rendering of such services. In addition, in the ordinary
course of our business, we may actively trade the Company Shares
and other securities of the Company, as well as securities of
the Acquiror for our own account and for the accounts of
customers and, accordingly, may at any time hold a long or short
position in such securities.
This opinion is furnished solely for the use and benefit of the
Board in connection with its consideration of the Transaction
and is not intended to, and does not, confer any rights or
remedies upon any other person, and is not intended to be used,
and may not be used, for any other purpose, without our prior
written consent. Furthermore, this opinion may not be published,
reproduced, summarized, disseminated, quoted or referred to at
any time, in any manner or for any purpose without the prior
written consent of Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner &
Smith Incorporated; provided, however, that if reference
to this opinion is required by applicable law or regulation to
be made in a proxy statement, prospectus or other shareholder
disclosure document in connection with the Transaction, we will
not unreasonably withhold our consent thereto so long as the
full text of this opinion is reproduced therein in the English
language and we approve in advance the text of any accompanying
disclosure. Our opinion (i) docs not address the merits of
the underlying decision by the Company to engage in the
Transaction, (ii) should not be construed as creating any
fiduciary duty on our part to any party and (iii) does not
constitute a recommendation to any shareholder as to how such
shareholder should vote its Company Shares with respect to the
Transaction or any matter related thereto. In addition, you have
not asked us to address, and this opinion does not address, the
fairness to, or any other consideration of, the holders of any
class of securities, creditors or other constituencies of the
Company, other than the holders of the Company Shares.
On the basis of and subject to the foregoing, we are of the
opinion that, as of the date hereof, the Consideration to be
received by the holders of the Company Shares pursuant to the
Transaction is fair from a financial point of view to the
holders of such shares.
This Combination Agreement, made October 1, 2007, and
amended and restated as of January 22, 2008, is by and
between RBTT Financial Holdings Limited
(“RBTT”) and Royal Bank of Canada
(“RBC”).
NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants
contained herein and other good and valuable consideration (the
receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged) the
parties hereto agree as follows:
ARTICLE 1
INTERPRETATION
Section 1.1 Defined
Terms.
As used in this Agreement, the following terms have the
following meanings:
“Affiliate” means, with respect to a specified
Person, another Person that directly or indirectly through one
or more intermediaries, Controls or is Controlled by or is under
common Control with the Person specified.
“Agreement” means this combination agreement
and all Schedules attached to it; and the expressions
“Article” and “Section”
followed by a number mean and refer to the specified Article or
Section of this Agreement.
“Amalgamation” means the amalgamation of RBTT
and Newco in accordance with the Amalgamation Agreement.
“Amalgamation Agreement” means the amalgamation
agreement to be entered into by RBTT, RBC and Newco,
substantially in the form of the agreement attached hereto as
Schedule “A”.
“Ancillary Agreements” means all agreements,
certificates, letters and other instruments delivered or given
pursuant to this Agreement, including the Amalgamation Agreement
and the Articles of Amalgamation.
“Articles of Amalgamation” means the articles
of amalgamation of the amalgamated company resulting from the
amalgamation of RBTT and Newco in respect of the Amalgamation
that are required by the Companies Act to be sent to the
Registrar.
“Authorization” means, with respect to any
Person or matter, any order, permit, approval, consent, waiver,
licence or similar authorization of any Governmental Entity
having jurisdiction over the Person or matter.
“Bank Regulator” means any Governmental Entity
charged with the supervision or regulation of banks or bank
holding companies.
“Business Day” means any day of the year, other
than a Saturday, Sunday or any day on which major banks are
closed for business in Toronto, Ontario, Bridgetown, Barbados or
Port-of-Spain, Trinidad and Tobago.
“Canadian Bank Approvals” means those
Regulatory Approvals of Canadian Bank Regulators set forth on
Schedule “B”.
“Canadian GAAP” means accounting principles
generally accepted in Canada, including those that are
recommended in the Handbook of the Canadian Institute of
Chartered Accountants, at the relevant time applied on a
consistent basis.
“Cash Amount” means TT$24.00 (or, where an RBTT
Shareholder duly so elects in accordance with this Agreement,
the U.S. Dollar Equivalent of TT$24.00).
“Certificate of Amalgamation” has the meaning
given such term in the Amalgamation Agreement.
“Closing” means the consummation of the
amalgamation of RBTT and Newco and the Redemption in accordance
with the Amalgamation Agreement.
“Closing Date” means June 30, 2008 or such
earlier date or later date as the Parties may mutually agree in
writing prior to the Outside Date upon which the Closing shall
occur, in each case, subject to the conditions set forth in
Article 6 and subject to the right of either RBTT, on the
one hand, or RBC, on the other hand, to postpone the Closing
Date for up to an additional 90 days thereafter (in
30-day
increments) if the Regulatory Approvals have not been obtained
and have not been denied by a non-appealable decision of a
Governmental Entity, by giving written notice to the other to
such effect no later than 5:00 p.m. (Eastern time) on the
date that is 15 days prior to the original Closing Date
(and any subsequent Closing Date).
“Collar Exchange Ratio” has the meaning given
such term in the Amalgamation Agreement.
“Companies Act” means the Companies Act
(Chp. 81:01 of the Laws of the Republic of Trinidad and
Tobago), as amended.
“Confidentiality Agreement” means the
confidentiality agreement between RBTT and RBC dated as of
July 13, 2007, as amended, restated or otherwise modified
from time to time in accordance with its terms.
“Contract” means any agreement, contract,
licence, undertaking, engagement or commitment of any nature,
written or oral.
“Control” means the possession, directly or
indirectly, of the power to direct or cause the direction of the
management or policies of a Person, whether through the ability
to exercise voting power, by contract or otherwise.
“Controlling” and “Controlled”
have corresponding meanings.
“Credit Suisse” has the meaning given such term
in Section 3.1(x).
“Effective Time” has the meaning given such
term in the Amalgamation Agreement.
“Election Deadline” has the meaning given such
term in Section 2.6.
“Election Form” means the election form
provided to holders of RBTT Ordinary Shares in order that such
holders may make the election described in Section 2.6.
“Environmental Laws” means all applicable Laws
and agreements with Governmental Entities relating to public
health or the protection of the environment or relating to
hazardous or toxic substances, pollutants or contaminants and
all Authorizations issued pursuant to such Laws or agreements.
“Escrow Agent” has the meaning given such term
in Section 2.3.
“Governmental Entity” means (i) any
international, multinational, national, federal, provincial,
state, municipal, local or other governmental or public
department, central bank, court, commission, board, bureau,
agency or instrumentality, domestic or foreign, (ii) any
subdivision or authority of any of the foregoing, (iii) any
quasi-governmental or self-regulatory or other private body
exercising any regulatory, expropriation or taxing authority
under or for the account of any of the above, or (iv) any
stock exchange.
“IAS” means International Accounting Standards.
“IFRS” means International Financial Reporting
Standards.
“Interbank Agreements” has the meaning given
such term in Section 3.1(jj)(i).
“Interested Person” has the meaning given such
term in Section 3.1(ii)(i).
“Laws” means any and all applicable
(i) laws, constitutions, treaties, statutes, codes,
ordinances, principles of common and civil law and equity,
orders, decrees, rules, policies, regulations, guidelines,
directives and municipal by-laws whether domestic, foreign or
international, and (ii) judicial, arbitral, administrative,
ministerial, departmental and regulatory judgments, orders,
writs, injunctions, decisions, rulings, determinations, and
awards of any Governmental Entity, in each case binding on or
affecting the Person referred to in the context in which the
word is used.
“Liabilities” means with respect to any Person,
any liability or obligation of such Person of any kind,
character or description, absolute or contingent, or accrued or
unaccrued.
“Lien” means (i) any mortgage, charge,
pledge, hypothec, security interest, assignment, lien (statutory
or otherwise), easement, title retention agreement or
arrangement, conditional sale, deemed or statutory trust,
restrictive covenant or other encumbrance of any nature or
(ii) any other arrangement or condition which, in
substance, secures payment or performance of an obligation.
“Loans” has the meaning given such term in
Section 3.1(dd)(i).
“Matching Period” has the meaning given such
term in Section 5.7(a).
“Merrill” has the meaning given such term in
Section 3.1(x).
“Newco” means RBC Holdings
(Trinidad & Tobago) Limited, a corporation indirectly
wholly-owned by RBC incorporated under the Laws of Trinidad and
Tobago.
“Notice” has the meaning given such term in
Section 8.1.
“Ordinary Course” means, with respect to an
action taken by a Person, that such action is taken in the
ordinary course of the normal day-to-day business operations of
the Person and, in any event, constitutes prudent banking
practice and prudent commercial practice.
“Per Share Consideration” means the amount per
RBTT Ordinary Share that is equal to the sum of (a) the
Cash Amount and (b) the Share Amount.
“Person” means a natural person, partnership,
limited partnership, limited liability partnership, corporation,
limited liability corporation, limited liability company,
unlimited liability company, joint stock company, trust,
unincorporated association, joint venture or other entity or
Governmental Entity, and pronouns have a similarly extended
meaning.
“Pre-Combination Reorganization” has the
meaning given such term in Section 5.3(3).
“RBC” means Royal Bank of Canada, a
Schedule I Chartered Bank established under the Bank Act
(Canada).
“RBC Closing Average Share Price” has the
meaning given such term in the Amalgamation Agreement.
“RBC Common Shares” means the common shares in
the capital of RBC.
“RBC Contract” means any contract, agreement,
licence, franchise, lease, arrangement, commitment,
understanding or other right or obligation to which RBC or any
of the RBC Subsidiaries is a party or by which RBC or any of the
RBC Subsidiaries is bound or affected or to which any of their
respective properties or assets is subject.
“RBC Exchanges” means the Toronto Stock
Exchange and the New York Stock Exchange.
“RBC Financial Statements” means the audited
financial statements of RBC for the fiscal years ending
October 31, 2006 and October 31, 2005, respectively,
consisting in each case of a balance sheet and the accompanying
statements of income, changes in shareholders’ equity and
cash flow for the year then ended and all notes to them,
together with a report of the auditors, Deloitte &
Touche LLP, Chartered Accountants.
“RBC Interim Financial Statements” means the
consolidated balance sheet and the accompanying consolidated
statement of income for RBC for the period ended July 31,2007.
“RBC Material Adverse Effect” means any effect
that is, or would reasonably be expected to be, material and
adverse, individually or in the aggregate (i) to the
business, operations, condition (financial or otherwise) or
assets of RBC and the RBC Subsidiaries, taken as a whole; or
(ii) to the ability of RBC to consummate the transactions
contemplated hereby before the Outside Date, provided that in
the case of clause (i) “RBC Material Adverse
Effect” shall not include any change or effect on the
business of RBC and the RBC Subsidiaries attributable to
(a) changes in general economic conditions affecting banks
generally in the regions where RBC and the RBC Subsidiaries
conduct their business, except to the extent that such changes
are disproportionately adverse to RBC or the RBC Subsidiaries,
(b) any actions taken or omitted to be taken by RBC and the
RBC Subsidiaries pursuant to the express terms of this
Agreement, (c) the announcement of the execution and
delivery of this Agreement or the transactions contemplated
hereby, or (d) commencement, occurrence or continuation of
any war, armed hostilities or acts of terrorism, except to the
extent that the effects thereof are disproportionately adverse
to RBC or the RBC Subsidiaries.
“RBC Material Contract” means any RBC Contract
that is material to the business, operations or financial
condition of RBC and the RBC Subsidiaries, taken as a whole.
“RBC Material Subsidiaries” means (i) each
RBC Subsidiary, the total assets of which constituted more than
ten percent of the consolidated assets of RBC as of
October 31, 2006 or the total revenues of which, for the
year ended October 31, 2006, constituted more than ten
percent of the consolidated revenues of RBC, in each case as set
out in the financial statements of RBC as of and for the year
ended October 31, 2006 and (ii) each RBC Subsidiary
that directly or indirectly holds an equity interest in each
such RBC Subsidiary.
“RBC Shareholders” means the holders of RBC
Common Shares.
“RBC Subsidiary” means any corporation,
partnership, joint venture or other legal entity of which RBC
(either alone or through or together with any other subsidiary)
owns, directly or indirectly, more than 50% of the stock or
other equity interests the holders of which are generally
entitled to vote for the election of the board of directors or
other governing body of such corporation or other legal entity
or has, directly or indirectly, the right to appoint a majority
of the board of directors or other governing body of such
corporation or other legal entity.
“RBTT” means RBTT Financial Holdings Limited, a
corporation governed by the laws of Trinidad and Tobago.
“RBTT Acquisition Proposal” means any proposal,
offer or public announcement with respect to any direct or
indirect merger, amalgamation, arrangement, exchange or tender
offer, take over bid, sale of assets (including the shares or
assets of an RBTT Subsidiary) or similar transaction
representing more than 20% of the book value (on a consolidated
basis) of RBTT’s total assets, any issuance, sale, transfer
or acquisition of more than 20% of RBTT’s Ordinary Shares
then
outstanding or any similar transaction involving RBTT or any
RBTT Subsidiary, whether in one or a series of steps or
transactions, excluding the Amalgamation.
“RBTT Affiliate Transaction” means a
transaction or series of transactions between two or more
wholly-owned RBTT Subsidiaries or between RBTT and a
wholly-owned RBTT Subsidiary.
“RBTT Amalgamation Resolution” means the
special resolution of the RBTT Shareholders approving the
transactions contemplated hereby, including the Amalgamation, to
be substantially in the form and content of Schedule
“C” hereto.
“RBTT Circular” means the management
information circular and notice of RBTT Meeting, including all
schedules and exhibits thereto, to be sent to RBTT
Securityholders in connection with the RBTT Meeting, as the same
may be amended, supplemented or otherwise modified, subject to
this Agreement.
“RBTT Contract” means any Contract to which
RBTT or any of the RBTT Subsidiaries is a party or by which RBTT
or any of the RBTT Subsidiaries is bound or affected or to which
any of their respective properties or assets is subject.
“RBTT Disclosure Letter” means that certain
disclosure letter dated as of even date herewith and delivered
by RBTT to RBC, which shall be arranged in sections and
subsections corresponding to the numbered and lettered sections
and subsections contained in Article 3 or
Section 5.3(1) and containing the disclosure information
required in each such section by the terms of this Agreement,
with the disclosures in any section or subsection qualifying the
corresponding section or subsection in Article 3 or
Section 5.3(1), as well as any other section or subsection
of Article 3 or Section 5.3(1) if the relevance of the
disclosed item to such other section or subsection is readily
apparent on its face.
“RBTT Employee Plans” means all the employee
benefit, fringe benefit, supplemental unemployment benefit,
bonus, incentive, profit sharing, termination, change of
control, pension, retirement, stock option, stock purchase,
stock appreciation, employee loan, health, welfare, medical,
dental, disability, life insurance and similar plans,
programmes, or arrangements relating to the current or former
directors, officers or employees of RBTT or any of the RBTT
Subsidiaries maintained, sponsored or funded by RBTT or any of
the RBTT Subsidiaries, whether written or oral, funded or
unfunded, insured or self-insured, registered or unregistered
under which RBTT or any of the RBTT Subsidiaries may have any
liability, contingent or otherwise.
“RBTT Employees” means those individuals
employed by RBTT or any of the RBTT Subsidiaries.
“RBTT Exchanges” means the Trinidad and Tobago
Stock Exchange, the Barbados Stock Exchange and the Jamaica
Stock Exchange.
“RBTT Financial Statements” means the audited
consolidated financial statements of RBTT for the fiscal years
ending March 31, 2007 and March 31, 2006,
respectively, consisting in each case of a balance sheet and the
accompanying profit and loss account, statement of changes in
equity and statement of changes in cash resources for the year
then ended and all notes to them, together with a report of the
auditors, PricewaterhouseCoopers, Chartered Accountants.
“RBTT In-The-Money Option” means an RBTT Option
with an exercise price less than the Per Share Consideration.
“RBTT Intellectual Property Rights” has the
meaning given such term in Section 3.1(p).
“RBTT Interim Financial Statements” means the
consolidated balance sheet and the accompanying consolidated
statement of income for RBTT for the period ended June 30,2007.
“RBTT Labour and Employment Arrangements” has
the meaning given such term in Section 5.3(1)(j).
“RBTT Material Adverse Effect” means any effect
that is, or would reasonably be expected to be, material and
adverse, individually or in the aggregate (i) to the
business, operations, condition (financial or otherwise), assets
or liabilities of RBTT and the RBTT Subsidiaries, taken as a
whole; or (ii) to the ability of RBTT to consummate the
transactions contemplated hereby before the Outside Date,
provided that in the case of clause (i) “RBTT
Material Adverse Effect” shall not include any change
or effect on the business of RBTT and the RBTT Subsidiaries
attributable to (a) changes in general economic conditions
affecting banks generally in the regions where RBTT and the RBTT
Subsidiaries conduct their business, except to the extent that
such changes are disproportionately adverse to RBTT or any of
the RBTT Subsidiaries, (b) any actions taken or omitted to
be taken by RBTT or any of the RBTT Subsidiaries pursuant to the
express terms of this Agreement, (c) the announcement of
the execution and delivery of this Agreement or the transactions
contemplated hereby, or (d) commencement, occurrence or
continuation of any war, armed hostilities or acts of terrorism,
except to the extent that the effects thereof are
disproportionately adverse to RBTT or any of the RBTT
Subsidiaries.
“RBTT Material Contract” means any RBTT
Contract that (i) is outside the Ordinary Course of
business (and for this purpose, any RBTT Contract that involves
payments to or by RBTT or any RBTT Subsidiary in excess of
$1,000,000
annually shall be deemed to be outside of the Ordinary Course of
business), (ii) by its terms, is not terminable within
90 days’ prior notice (without termination fee or
penalty) and that may result in total payments by RBTT or any
RBTT Subsidiary in excess of $1,000,000, (iii) constitutes
a material agreement filed or required to be filed under
applicable securities Laws or with the Bank Regulators,
(iv) constitutes a material partnership, shareholder or
joint venture arrangement with any third party,
(v) constitutes a confidentiality, non-competition
agreement or other contract or agreement that limits the freedom
of RBTT or any RBTT Subsidiary to engage in any line of business
or to compete with any Person, (vi) involves any
indemnification arrangement between RBTT and any director or
officer of RBTT or of any of the RBTT Subsidiaries,
(vii) involves any guarantee or similar obligation running
from RBTT or any of the RBTT Subsidiaries to any Person (other
than an RBTT Affiliate Transaction) entered into outside of the
Ordinary Course of business in excess of $10,000,000,
(viii) relates to credit card association memberships or
ATM or debit card networks and to which RBTT or any RBTT
Material Subsidiary is a party, (ix) relates to information
technology or intellectual property that is material to the
business or operations of RBTT or the RBTT Subsidiaries,
(x) is an underwriting agreement involving a potential
liability for unfulfilled sale, placement or similar obligations
of greater than $25,000,000, (xi) relates to the purchase
and sale of financial or other futures or derivatives (other
than an RBTT Affiliate Transaction) entered into outside of the
Ordinary Course of business, (xii) relates to interest rate
or currency swaps or hedges (other than an RBTT Affiliate
Transaction) entered into outside of the Ordinary Course of
business, (xiii) relates to data processing services or
operational support (including outsourcing arrangements), or
(xiv) is otherwise material to the business, operations or
financial condition of RBTT and the RBTT Subsidiaries, taken as
a whole.
“RBTT Material Subsidiaries” means
(i) each RBTT Subsidiary, the total assets of which
constituted more than ten percent of the consolidated assets of
RBTT as of March 31, 2007 or the total revenues of which,
for the year ended March 31, 2007, constituted more than
ten percent of the consolidated revenues of RBTT, in each case
as set out in the financial statements of RBTT as of and for the
year ended March 31, 2007, (ii) each RBTT Subsidiary
listed in Schedule “E”, and (iii) each RBTT
Subsidiary that directly or indirectly holds an equity interest
in any RBTT Subsidiary described in clause (i) or
(ii) above.
“RBTT Meeting” means the special meeting of
RBTT Shareholders, including any adjournment or postponement
thereof, to be called for the purpose of obtaining the Required
RBTT Vote.
“RBTT Meeting Date” means the date of the RBTT
Meeting which shall be established by RBTT following
consultation with RBC, but which in any event shall be no
earlier than January 30, 2008 and no later than
March 31, 2008, unless otherwise agreed by the Parties.
“RBTT Option Plan” means the ordinary share
option plan of RBTT, implemented by RBTT as of May 14,2002, providing for the grant of options to acquire RBTT
Ordinary Shares, as amended in accordance with this Agreement.
“RBTT Option Plan Amendment” has the meaning
given such term in Section 2.1(c).
“RBTT Options” means options to purchase RBTT
Ordinary Shares granted under the RBTT Option Plan.
“RBTT Ordinary Shares” means the ordinary
shares in the capital of RBTT.
“RBTT Out-Of-The-Money Option” means an RBTT
Option with an exercise price equal to or greater than the Per
Share Consideration.
“RBTT Properties” has the meaning given such
term in Section 3.1(n).
“RBTT Securityholders” means the holders of
RBTT Ordinary Shares and RBTT Options.
“RBTT Shareholders” means the holders of RBTT
Ordinary Shares.
“RBTT Subsidiary” means any corporation,
partnership, joint venture or other legal entity of which RBTT
(either alone or through or together with any other subsidiary)
owns, directly or indirectly, more than 50% of the stock or
other equity interests the holders of which are generally
entitled to vote for the election of the board of directors or
other governing body of such corporation or other legal entity
or has, directly or indirectly, the right to appoint a majority
of the board of directors or other governing body of such
corporation or other legal entity.
“RBTT Superior Proposal”means any unsolicited,
bona fide, written RBTT Acquisition Proposal that
(a) contemplates the acquisition of at least 50.1% of the
outstanding RBTT Ordinary Shares or all or substantially all of
the assets of RBTT and the RBTT Subsidiaries; (b) provides
for consideration per RBTT Ordinary Share of at least TT$41.00;
and (c) in the good faith determination of the Board of
Directors of RBTT in exercising their fiduciary obligations
after consultation with financial advisors and outside counsel
(i) is reasonably capable of being completed, taking into
account the availability of any required financing and all
legal, financial, regulatory, timing and other aspects of such
proposal, and the
Person making such proposal, and (ii) would reasonably be
expected to, if consummated in accordance with its terms (but
without discounting any risk of non-completion), result in a
transaction more favourable to RBTT, and more favourable from a
financial point of view (including any financing terms, any
termination payment payable under this Agreement and any
conditions to the consummation thereof), to the RBTT
Shareholders, than the transactions contemplated by this
Agreement.
“RBTT Technology”has the meaning given such
term in Section 3.1(p).
“Real Property Leases”has the meaning given
such term in Section 3.1(n).
“Redemption”has the meaning given such term in
the Amalgamation Agreement.
“Registrar”has the meaning given such term in
the Amalgamation Agreement.
“Regulatory Approvals”means those sanctions,
rulings, consents, orders, exemptions, licences, permits,
authorizations, waivers and other approvals (including the
lapse, without objection, of a prescribed time under a statute
or regulation that states that a transaction may be implemented
if a prescribed time lapses following the giving of notice
without an objection being made) of Governmental Entities or
pursuant to applicable Laws, which must be obtained in order to
consummate the transactions contemplated by this Agreement and
the Ancillary Agreements in accordance with all applicable Laws,
including as set forth on Schedule “D”.
“Related Party”means, with respect to any
Person, such Person’s Affiliates, and the directors and
senior officers of such Person and of such Person’s
Affiliates.
“Required RBTT Vote”means approval of the
transactions contemplated by this Agreement, including the RBTT
Amalgamation Resolution, by a majority of no less than 75% of
the number of the votes cast by the holders of RBTT Ordinary
Shares at the RBTT Meeting, voting together as one class, in
person or by proxy.
“Share Amount”means the product of
(a) the Collar Exchange Ratio, and (b) the RBC Closing
Average Share Price, rounded to the nearest one-tenth of one
cent ($0.001).
“Severance or Change of Control Plan”means any
severance, change of control, “golden parachute”,
“tin parachute”, transaction bonus, or other plan,
policy, agreement, arrangement, commitment, obligation or
understanding pursuant to which RBTT or any RBTT Subsidiary is
or will be obligated to pay any amount or provide any benefit to
(or accelerate or modify any payment or benefit to be paid or
provided to) any officer, employee or director of any of them as
a result of or in connection with the Amalgamation or any of the
other transactions contemplated by this Agreement or the
Ancillary Agreements, either before, upon or after the
consummation thereof.
“Superior Proposal Notice”has the meaning
given such term in Section 5.7(a).
“Tax Authority”means any government, state or
municipality or any local, state, federal or other fiscal,
revenue, customs or excise authority, body or official anywhere
in the world competent to impose, regulate, administer or
collect any liability to Taxes.
“Tax Returns”means any and all returns,
reports, declarations, elections, notices, forms, designations,
filings, and statements (including estimated tax returns and
reports, withholding tax returns and reports, and information
returns and reports) filed or required to be filed in respect of
Taxes.
“Taxes”means (i) any and all taxes,
duties, fees, excises, premiums, assessments, imposts, levies
and other charges or assessments of any kind whatsoever imposed
by any Governmental Entity, whether computed on a separate,
consolidated, unitary, combined or other basis, including those
levied on, or measured by, or described with respect to, income,
gross receipts, profits, gains, windfalls, capital, capital
stock, production, recapture, transfer, land transfer, licence,
gift, occupation, wealth, environment, net worth, indebtedness,
surplus, sales, goods and services, harmonized sales, use,
value-added, excise, special assessment, stamp, withholding,
business, franchising, real or personal property, health,
employee health, payroll, workers’ compensation, employment
or unemployment, severance, social services, social security,
education, utility, surtaxes, customs, import or export, and
including all license and registration fees and all employment
insurance, health insurance and government pension plan premiums
or contributions; and (ii) all instalments, interest,
penalties, fines, additions to tax or other additional amounts
imposed by any Governmental Entity on or in respect of amounts
of the type described in clause (i) above or this clause
(ii).
“Trust or Agency Agreement”means any
instrument, indenture, declaration, agreement, will, contract,
resolution or other document under which a Person acts as an
executor, trustee, fiduciary, representative, agent (including a
custodian, paying agent or escrow agent), conservator, guardian
or in a similar capacity.
“Trust or Agency Records”has the meaning given
such term in Section 3.1(gg).
“U.S. Dollar Equivalent”means, with
respect to an amount expressed in TT$, such TT$ amount divided
by the simple average of (i) the volume weighted average of
the buying rate and (ii) the volume weighted average of the
selling rate, in each case for conversion of U.S. dollars
into Trinidad and Tobago dollars as publicly reported by the
Central Bank of Trinidad and Tobago for the five
(5) consecutive trading days ending on the last Business
Day immediately preceding the date of calculation, rounded to
the nearest one tenth of one cent ($0.001).
Section 1.2 Gender
and Number.
Any reference in this Agreement or any Ancillary Agreement to
gender includes all genders. Words importing the singular number
only shall include the plural and vice versa.
Section 1.3 Headings,
etc.
The provision of a Table of Contents, the division of this
Agreement into Articles and Sections and the insertion of
headings are for convenient reference only and are not to affect
its interpretation.
Section 1.4 Currency.
All references in this Agreement or any Ancillary Agreement to
dollars or to $ are expressed in currency of the United States
of America unless otherwise specifically indicated.
Section 1.5 Certain
Phrases, etc.
In this Agreement and any Ancillary Agreement (i) the words
“including”, “includes”and
“include”mean “including (or includes
or include) without limitation”, and (ii) the
phrase “the aggregate of”, “the total
of”, “the sum of”, or a phrase of
similar meaning means “the aggregate (or total or sum),
without duplication, of”. In the computation of periods
of time from a specified date to a later specified date, unless
otherwise expressly stated, the word “from”means “from and including”and the words
“to”and “until”each mean
“to but excluding”.
Section 1.6 Knowledge.
Each reference herein to the knowledge of RBTT with respect to
any representation and warranty means, unless otherwise
specified, the knowledge of the executive officers listed in
Schedule “F” following reasonable inquiry within
RBTT’s organization, including inquiry with the executive
responsible for the subject matter of such representation and
warranty.
Section 1.7 Accounting
Terms.
All accounting terms not specifically defined in this Agreement
are to be interpreted in accordance with IAS and IFRS, except as
otherwise expressly provided in this Agreement.
Section 1.8 Incorporation
of Schedules.
The schedules attached to this Agreement form an integral part
of it for all purposes of this Agreement.
Section 1.9 References
to Persons and Statutes.
Any reference in this Agreement or any Ancillary Agreement to a
Person includes its successors and permitted assigns. Except as
otherwise provided in this Agreement or any Ancillary Agreement,
any reference in this Agreement to a statute refers to such
statute and all rules and regulations made under it, as it or
they may have been or may from time to time be amended or
re-enacted.
Section 1.10 Non-Business
Days.
Whenever payments are to be made or an action is to be taken on
a day which is not a Business Day, such payment shall be made or
such action shall be taken on or not later than the next
succeeding Business Day.
RBTT covenants in favour of RBC that RBTT shall, in accordance
with the provisions hereof:
(a)
subject to Section 2.5, duly call, give notice of, convene
and hold the RBTT Meeting;
(b)
use commercially reasonable efforts to solicit from the holders
of RBTT Ordinary Shares proxies in favour of the approval of the
RBTT Amalgamation Resolution and take all other action that is
reasonably necessary to secure the approval of the RBTT
Amalgamation Resolution by RBTT Shareholders, except to the
extent that the RBTT Board of Directors has changed its
recommendation in accordance with Section 5.7;
(c)
cause the RBTT Option Plan to be amended (the “RBTT
Option Plan Amendment”) as required to provide that,
subject to and conditional upon Closing, (i) all issued and
outstanding RBTT Options will be deemed to have vested,
immediately prior to the Effective Time, (ii) each
unexercised RBTT In-The-Money Option will be deemed cancelled,
immediately prior to the Effective Time, in exchange for a cash
amount equal to the difference between the Per Share
Consideration and its exercise price, (iii) each RBTT
Out-Of-The-Money Option will be cancelled immediately prior to
the Effective Time without payment of any further consideration,
and (iv) no exercises of RBTT Options shall be permitted
from and after the date that is five (5) Business Days
prior to the Closing Date; and
(d)
execute and deliver the Amalgamation Agreement on or before the
Closing Date.
Section 2.2 Implementation
Steps by RBC.
RBC covenants in favour of RBTT that RBC shall, in accordance
with the provisions hereof:
(a)
cause Newco to be formed as soon as practicable after the date
of this Agreement;
(b)
execute and deliver, and cause Newco to execute and deliver, the
Amalgamation Agreement on or before the Closing Date; and
(c)
subject to the satisfaction or waiver of each of the conditions
precedent for its benefit contained in this Agreement, at or
prior to the Effective Time, cause Newco to deposit or cause to
be deposited with the Escrow Agent, funds equal to (i) the
aggregate cash consideration payable for the RBTT Ordinary
Shares pursuant to the Amalgamation; plus (ii) the
aggregate amount payable by the Escrow Agent to subscribe for
RBC Common Shares pursuant to the Redemption.
Section 2.3 Appointment
of Escrow Agent.
The escrow agent and depositary (the “Escrow
Agent”) in connection with the Amalgamation and
subsequent redemption of the preferred shares to be issued
pursuant to the Amalgamation, shall be a financial institution
located in (or with a branch office located in) Trinidad and
Tobago, and shall be selected by RBC in consultation with RBTT.
RBC shall cause Newco to appoint the Escrow Agent to act in
accordance with the terms and conditions set out in the
Amalgamation Agreement and to enter into an escrow agreement
with the Escrow Agent on terms and conditions satisfactory to
RBC.
Section 2.4 Articles
of Amalgamation.
Subject to the terms and conditions hereof, the Amalgamation
shall be implemented by the filing of Articles of Amalgamation
and the issuance of the Certificate of Amalgamation (which shall
be dated the Closing Date), with such other matters as are
necessary to effect the Amalgamation, as a result of which,
among other things, at the Effective Time each RBTT Ordinary
Share outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Time, will
be cancelled in exchange for a combination of (a) cash; and
(b) preferred shares redeemable in exchange for RBC Common
Shares, all as described in the Amalgamation Agreement.
As promptly as reasonably practicable after the execution and
delivery of this Agreement, RBTT shall, in consultation with RBC:
(i)
establish a record date for receiving notice of and the right to
vote at the RBTT Meeting, such that the RBTT Meeting can be held
on the RBTT Meeting Date in accordance with applicable Laws;
(ii)
establish the RBTT Meeting Date; and
(iii)
subject to Section 2.7, in connection with the solicitation
of proxies with respect to the RBTT Meeting, cause the RBTT
Circular and other documentation required in connection with the
RBTT Meeting to be filed as required by applicable Laws and sent
to each RBTT Securityholder and each other Person to whom such
documents are required to be sent under applicable Laws.
(b)
Subject to Section 5.7(c), RBTT shall not without
RBC’s prior written consent:
(i)
change the record date for the RBTT Meeting; or
(ii)
adjourn, postpone or cancel (or propose for adjournment,
postponement or cancellation) the RBTT Meeting.
Section 2.6 Currency
Election.
Subject to compliance with this Section 2.6, each Person
who is a holder of RBTT Ordinary Shares, as reflected on
RBTT’s register of members or in the records of any
depository on the record date for the RBTT Meeting, shall be
entitled to make an election to receive the U.S. Dollar
Equivalent of the Cash Amount, calculated as of the second (2nd)
Business Day prior to the Closing Date. The election deadline
(the “Election Deadline”), as specified in the
Election Form, shall be established by RBTT after consultation
with RBC, but in any event shall be no later than the
forty-fifth (45th) day prior to the Closing Date, unless
otherwise agreed to by the Parties. If a holder of RBTT Ordinary
Shares has not deposited the Election Form with the Escrow Agent
by the Election Deadline, such holder shall be deemed not to
have elected to receive the U.S. Dollar Equivalent of the
Cash Amount.
Section 2.7 Preparation
of Filings, etc.
(1)
Subject to Section 5.2(4), the Parties shall use
commercially reasonable efforts to co-operate in the
preparation, seeking and obtaining of all circulars, filings,
consents, Regulatory Approvals and other approvals and other
matters in connection with this Agreement and the Amalgamation,
necessary to discharge their respective obligations under
Barbados, Trinidad and Tobago and other applicable federal,
provincial, territorial or state Laws in connection with the
Amalgamation and the other transactions contemplated hereby.
(2)
Each of the Parties shall furnish to the other all such
information concerning it and its securityholders and
subsidiaries as may be reasonably required (and, in the case of
its securityholders, available to it) for the effectuation of
the actions described in this Section 2.7, and each
covenants that no information furnished by it (to its knowledge
in the case of information concerning its securityholders) in
connection with such actions or otherwise in connection with the
consummation of the Amalgamation and the other transactions
contemplated by this Agreement will contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact required to
be stated in any such document or necessary in order to make any
information so furnished for use in any such document not
misleading in the light of the circumstances in which it is
furnished.
(3)
RBC and RBTT shall each promptly notify the other if at any time
before the Effective Time it becomes aware that the RBTT
Circular contains any untrue statement of a material fact or
omits to state a material fact required to be stated therein or
necessary to make the statements contained therein not
misleading in light of the circumstances in which they are made,
or that otherwise requires an amendment or supplement to the
RBTT Circular. In any such event, RBC and RBTT shall co-operate
in the preparation of a supplement or amendment to the RBTT
Circular, as required and as the case may be, and, if required,
shall cause the same to be distributed to securityholders of
RBTT and/or
filed with the relevant securities regulatory authorities
and/or stock
exchanges.
(4)
RBTT shall ensure that the RBTT Circular complies with all
applicable Laws. Without limiting the generality of the
foregoing, RBTT shall ensure that the RBTT Circular provides
holders of RBTT Ordinary Shares with information in sufficient
detail to permit them to form a reasoned judgement concerning
the matters to be placed before them at the RBTT Meeting, and
RBC shall provide all information regarding it and the RBC
Subsidiaries necessary to do so. RBTT shall ensure that the
fairness opinions referred to in Section 3.1(x) are
included in the RBTT Circular.
ARTICLE 3
REPRESENTATIONS
AND WARRANTIES OF RBTT
Section 3.1 Representations
and Warranties.
RBTT represents and warrants to and in favour of RBC as follows
and acknowledges that RBC is relying upon the following
representations and warranties in connection with the entering
into of this Agreement:
Corporate
Matters
(a)
Incorporation and Qualification. RBTT
(i) is a corporation duly incorporated, validly existing
and in good standing under the laws of Trinidad and Tobago,
(ii) has the corporate power to lease, own and operate the
property leased, owned or operated by it and to carry on its
business as it is currently conducted, and to execute, deliver
and perform its obligations under, this Agreement, and
(iii) is duly qualified or licensed to do business and is
in good standing as a foreign corporation or organization
authorized to do business in all jurisdictions in which the
character of the properties owned or leased or the nature of the
business conducted by it would make such qualification or
licensing necessary. Section 3.1(a) of the RBTT Disclosure
Letter lists all RBTT Subsidiaries and their respective
jurisdictions of incorporation. RBTT and the RBTT Material
Subsidiaries are qualified, licensed or registered to carry on
business in the jurisdictions set forth in Section 3.1(a)
of the RBTT Disclosure Letter. The jurisdictions set forth in
Section 3.1(a) of the RBTT Disclosure Letter include all
jurisdictions in which the nature of the business of RBTT and
the RBTT Material Subsidiaries makes such qualification
necessary or where RBTT owns or leases any material properties
or assets or conducts any material business.
(b)
Corporate Authorization. Except for the
Required RBTT Vote, the execution and delivery of and
performance by RBTT of this Agreement and each of the Ancillary
Agreements to which it is a party and the consummation of the
transactions contemplated hereby and thereby have been, or, in
the case of the Ancillary Agreements, will be on or prior to the
Effective Time, duly authorized by all necessary corporate
action on the part of RBTT.
(c)
No Conflict. Except as disclosed in
Section 3.1(c) of the RBTT Disclosure Letter and except for
the consents, approvals and waivers described in
Section 3.1(d) and Section 3.1(e) of the RBTT
Disclosure Letter, the execution and delivery of and performance
by RBTT, of this Agreement and each of the Ancillary Agreements
to which it is a party:
(i)
do not and will not (or would not with the giving of notice, the
lapse of time or the happening of any other event or condition)
constitute or result in a violation or breach of, or conflict
with, or allow any other Person to exercise any rights under,
any of the terms or provisions of RBTT’s constating
documents or by-laws;
(ii)
do not and will not (or would not with the giving of notice, the
lapse of time or the happening or any other event or condition)
constitute a material default under, result in a material
breach, violation, acceleration or termination of, or conflict
with or allow any other Person to exercise any rights under, any
of the terms or provisions of any RBTT Material Contracts;
(iii)
do not and will not result in a material breach of, or cause the
termination or revocation of, any material Authorization held by
RBTT necessary to the operation of RBTT’s business or the
businesses of the RBTT Subsidiaries; and
(iv)
do not and will not result in the violation of any Law.
(d)
Required Authorizations. There is no
requirement that RBTT or any RBTT Subsidiary make any filing
with, give any notice to, or obtain any Authorization of, any
Governmental Entity as a condition to the lawful completion of
the transactions contemplated by this Agreement, except for the
filings, notifications and Authorizations described in
Section 3.1(d) of the RBTT Disclosure Letter or that relate
solely to the identity of RBC or the nature of the business
carried on by RBC prior to the Effective Time.
Required Consents. There is no requirement
under any RBTT Material Contract to obtain any consent, approval
or waiver of any party thereto to any of the transactions
contemplated by this Agreement, except for the consents,
approvals and waivers described in Section 3.1(e) of the
RBTT Disclosure Letter.
(f)
Execution and Binding Obligation. This
Agreement and each of the Ancillary Agreements to which RBTT is
a party have been, or, in the case of the Ancillary Agreements,
will be on or prior to the Effective Time, duly executed and
delivered by RBTT and constitute legal, valid and binding
agreements of it, enforceable against it in accordance with
their respective terms, subject to applicable bankruptcy,
insolvency, reorganization, moratorium and similar laws
affecting creditors’ rights generally and to general
principles of equity.
(g)
Authorized and Issued Capital. The authorized
capital of RBTT consists of an unlimited number of RBTT Ordinary
Shares and an unlimited number of preferred shares. As of the
date hereof, (i) 343,793,683 RBTT Ordinary Shares (and no
more) have been duly issued and are outstanding as fully paid
and non assessable and (ii) no preferred shares are
currently outstanding. As at the date hereof, there are
4,269,837 RBTT Options outstanding to purchase 4,269,837 RBTT
Ordinary Shares. Section 3.1(g) of the RBTT Disclosure
Letter sets out a true and complete list of all outstanding RBTT
Options, including the number held by each holder, exercise
prices, dates of grants and expiration of such RBTT Options. All
RBTT Ordinary Shares issued upon the exercise of the RBTT
Options in accordance with their terms, will be duly authorized
and validly issued and fully paid and non-assessable. Except for
the RBTT Options described in the preceding sentences of this
Section 3.1(g), there are no options, subscriptions, calls,
warrants, conversion privileges or other rights, agreements,
arrangements or commitments (pre-emptive, contingent or
otherwise) relating to the issued or unissued securities of RBTT
or any of the RBTT Subsidiaries (including the RBTT Ordinary
Shares) obligating RBTT or any the RBTT Subsidiaries to issue or
sell any securities of RBTT or any of the RBTT Subsidiaries or
obligations of any kind convertible into or exchangeable for any
securities of RBTT or any RBTT Subsidiary (including the RBTT
Ordinary Shares). As of the date hereof, the fully diluted share
capital of RBTT is 348,063,520 RBTT Ordinary Shares (and no
more). The RBTT Ordinary Shares are not listed on any exchanges
other than the RBTT Exchanges.
(h)
Subsidiaries. Except as disclosed in
Section 3.1(h) of the RBTT Disclosure Letter, neither RBTT
nor any of the RBTT Subsidiaries has any ownership interest in
any Person which represents greater than 5% of the equity of
such Person, provided however, there shall not be included in
the foregoing (i) any marketable securities that can be
readily turned into cash, (ii) any security or proprietary
interest acquired in good faith through foreclosure, and
(iii) any security or proprietary interest to the extent
that it is owned or controlled by RBTT or an RBTT Subsidiary in
a bona fide fiduciary capacity. Except as disclosed in Section
3.1(h) of the RBTT Disclosure Letter, RBTT beneficially owns,
directly or indirectly, all of the issued and outstanding
securities of each of the RBTT Subsidiaries. All of the
outstanding shares of capital stock and other ownership
interests in the RBTT Subsidiaries are duly authorized, validly
issued, fully paid and non-assessable and all such shares and
other ownership interests held directly or indirectly by RBTT
are, except as disclosed in Section 3.1(h) of the RBTT
Disclosure Letter or pursuant to restrictions on transfer
contained in constating documents of wholly-owned RBTT
Subsidiaries, owned free and clear of all Liens, and there are
no outstanding options, rights, entitlements, understandings or
commitments (contingent or otherwise) regarding the right to
acquire any such shares of capital stock of any of the RBTT
Subsidiaries.
General
Matters Relating to the Business
(i)
Conduct of Business in Ordinary Course. Except
as disclosed in Section 3.1(i) of the RBTT Disclosure
Letter, since March 31, 2007, (A) RBTT and each of the
RBTT Subsidiaries has carried on its business in the Ordinary
Course, and (B) there has not been any action or occurrence
which would have constituted a breach of Section 5.3(1), if
such section had applied since March 31, 2007, other than
actions or occurrences which could not, individually or in the
aggregate, result in an RBTT Material Adverse Effect.
(j)
No Material Adverse Change. Since
March 31, 2007, there has not been an RBTT Material Adverse
Effect, and to the knowledge of RBTT no event has occurred or
circumstance exists which could, individually or in the
aggregate, result in such an RBTT Material Adverse Effect.
(k)
Compliance with Laws. RBTT and each of the
RBTT Subsidiaries is conducting its business in compliance in
all material respects with all applicable Laws.
Authorizations. RBTT and each of the RBTT
Material Subsidiaries owns, holds, possesses or lawfully uses in
the operation of its business, all material Authorizations which
are necessary for it to conduct its business as presently or
previously conducted in compliance in all material respects with
all applicable Laws. All material Authorizations are valid,
subsisting and in good standing, and RBTT and each of the RBTT
Material Subsidiaries is not in material default or breach of
any material Authorization and, to the knowledge of RBTT, no
proceeding is pending or threatened to revoke or limit any
material Authorization.
(m)
Public and Regulatory Filings. Except as
disclosed in Section 3.1(m) of the RBTT Disclosure Letter, since
March 31, 2007, RBTT and each of the RBTT Material
Subsidiaries has filed all disclosure documents required to be
filed by RBTT with RBTT Exchanges or pursuant to applicable
securities Laws and such disclosure documents (i) complied,
as of their respective dates, in all material respects with
applicable securities Laws, and (ii) at the time filed, did
not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to
state a material fact required to be stated therein necessary to
make the statements therein, in light of the circumstances under
which they were made, not misleading. Except as disclosed in
Section 3.1(m) of the RBTT Disclosure Letter, RBTT and each
of the RBTT Material Subsidiaries has filed all reports and
other documents required by any Governmental Entity and such
reports complied, as of their date of filing in all material
respects with applicable Laws enforced or promulgated by the
Governmental Entity with which they were filed, and (ii) at
the time filed, did not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact required to be
stated therein necessary to make the statements therein, in
light of the circumstances under which they were made, not
misleading.
(n)
Properties. Section 3.1(n) of the RBTT
Disclosure Letter contains a true and complete list of
(i) all of the real property owned by RBTT and the RBTT
Subsidiaries, and (ii) all leases, subleases and other
agreements under which RBTT or any of the RBTT Subsidiaries
leases, subleases, uses or occupies, or has the right to use or
occupy, any real property with annual base rent in excess of
$1,000,000 (the “Real Property Leases”). RBTT
and each of the RBTT Subsidiaries has good and sufficient title
to its real property interests, leases, licences, easements,
rights of way and permits permitting the use of land or premises
by RBTT and the RBTT Subsidiaries (collectively, the
“RBTT Properties”), necessary to permit the
operation of its current businesses, as they are now being
conducted, except for such defects of title in respect of any
real property or failures to hold such leases, licences,
easements, rights of way or permits as would, individually or in
the aggregate, not materially adversely affect the operations of
the businesses conducted thereon or the value of such RBTT
Property. To the knowledge of RBTT, there are no defaults or
events which, with the notice of or lapse of time or both, would
constitute a material default on the part of RBTT or any of the
RBTT Subsidiaries or would constitute a material default on the
part of the other parties to the Real Property Leases.
(o)
Material Contracts. Section 3.1(o) of the
RBTT Disclosure Letter sets forth a true and complete list of
all RBTT Material Contracts. RBTT or the RBTT Subsidiary party
thereto has performed, in all material respects, all of the
obligations required to be performed by it and has not waived
any material rights, and is entitled to all benefits, under each
RBTT Material Contract. Neither RBTT nor any of the RBTT
Subsidiaries is or is alleged to be in default of any RBTT
Material Contract. Each RBTT Material Contract is in full force
and effect and constitutes a legal, valid and binding obligation
of the parties thereto, unamended, and there exists no default
or event of default or event, occurrence, condition or act
which, with the giving of notice, the lapse of time or the
happening of any other event or condition, would become a
material default or event of default under any RBTT Material
Contract. As of the date hereof, RBTT has not received written
notice that any party to an RBTT Material Contract intends to
cancel, terminate or otherwise modify or not renew such RBTT
Material Contract, and to the knowledge of RBTT, no such action
has been threatened.
(p)
Intellectual Property. (i) RBTT and the
RBTT Subsidiaries own or have validly licensed (and are not in
material breach of such licences) all patents, trade-marks,
trade names, service marks, copyrights, know-how and all other
intellectual property and proprietary rights that are material
to the conduct of their businesses as presently conducted
(collectively, the “RBTT Intellectual Property
Rights”); (ii) such RBTT Intellectual Property
Rights are sufficient for conducting the businesses, in all
material respects, as presently conducted, of RBTT and the RBTT
Subsidiaries; (iii) to the knowledge of RBTT, such RBTT
Intellectual Property Rights do not infringe upon any third
parties’ intellectual property and proprietary rights;
(iv) there are no pending, or to the knowledge of RBTT, any
threatened, litigation, adversarial proceeding, administrative
action or other challenge or claim relating to the RBTT
Intellectual Property Rights, and to the knowledge of RBTT no
event will occur as a result of the transactions contemplated
hereby that would render invalid or unenforceable any
such RBTT Intellectual Property Rights; (v) all material
hardware, software and firmware, processed data, technology
infrastructure and other computer systems used in connection
with the conduct of the businesses, as presently conducted, of
RBTT and the RBTT Subsidiaries (collectively, the “RBTT
Technology”), are up-to-date and sufficient for
conducting the business, as presently conducted, of RBTT and the
RBTT Subsidiaries; and (vi) RBTT and the RBTT Subsidiaries
own or have validly licensed (and are not in material breach of
such licences) such RBTT Technology and have commercially
reasonable virus protection and security measures in place in
relation to such RBTT Technology.
(q)
Environmental Matters. Except as set forth in
Section 3.1(q) of the RBTT Disclosure Letter, to the
knowledge of RBTT: (i) none of the RBTT Properties
(A) contains any contaminants located in the ground or in
groundwater, (B) has ever been used by any Person as a
waste disposal site or as a licensed landfill, or (C) has
ever had asbestos-containing materials, PCBs, radioactive
substances or aboveground or underground storage systems, active
or abandoned, located on, at or under them; (ii) no
properties adjacent to any of the RBTT Properties are
contaminated where such contamination could, if it migrated to
an RBTT Property, have a material adverse effect on such RBTT
Property; and (iii) RBTT has not been required by any
Governmental Entity to (A) alter any of the RBTT Properties
in a material way in order to be in compliance with
Environmental Laws, or (B) perform any environmental
closure, material decommissioning, rehabilitation, restoration
or post-remedial investigations, on, about, or in connection
with any real property.
(r)
RBTT Employees. Except as set forth in
Section 3.1(r) or Section 3.1(s) of the RBTT
Disclosure Letter:
(i)
to the knowledge of RBTT, RBTT and the RBTT Subsidiaries are in
compliance in all material respects with all terms and
conditions of employment and all Laws respecting employment,
including pay equity, wages and hours of work and occupational
health and safety, and there are no outstanding claims,
complaints, investigations or orders under any such Laws;
(ii)
RBTT and the RBTT Subsidiaries have not and are not engaged in
any unfair labour practice and no unfair labour practice
complaint, grievance or arbitration proceeding is pending or, to
the knowledge of RBTT, threatened against RBTT or any of the
RBTT Subsidiaries;
(iii)
no collective agreement is currently being negotiated by RBTT or
any of the RBTT Subsidiaries or any other Person in respect of
RBTT Employees;
(iv)
no trade union, council of trade unions, employee bargaining
agency or affiliated bargaining agent holds bargaining rights
with respect to any RBTT Employees by way of certification,
interim certification, voluntary recognition, or succession
rights, or has applied or, to the knowledge of RBTT, threatened
to apply to be certified as the bargaining agent of RBTT
Employees. To the knowledge of RBTT, there are no threatened or
pending union organizing activities involving any RBTT
Employees. There is no labour strike, dispute, work slowdown or
stoppage pending or involving or, to the knowledge of RBTT,
threatened against RBTT or any of the RBTT Subsidiaries and no
such event has occurred within the last three
(3) years; and
(v)
no RBTT Employee is entitled to any change of control,
severance, retention bonus or similar payment or compensation as
a result of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement.
(s)
Employee Plans.
(i)
RBTT has made available to RBC true, correct and complete copies
of all RBTT Employee Plans as amended, together with all related
documentation including funding and investment management
agreements, summary plan descriptions, the most recent actuarial
reports, financial statements, asset statements, material
opinions and memoranda (whether externally or internally
prepared) and material correspondence with regulatory
authorities or other relevant Persons.
(ii)
Except as disclosed in Section 3.1(s) of the RBTT
Disclosure Letter, neither RBTT nor any of the RBTT Subsidiaries
sponsors or participates in a defined benefit pension plan.
(iii)
All Severance or Change of Control Plans currently in effect are
listed in Section 3.1(s) of the RBTT Disclosure Letter and
such Section 3.1(s), for each such Severance or Change of
Control Plan, describes with reasonable particularity the
aggregate amount or value of payments, compensation or benefits
payable or owing under such Severance or Change of Control Plan
and the conditions and schedule applicable thereto.
(iv) Except as disclosed in Section 3.1(s) of the RBTT
Disclosure Letter:
(A)
all RBTT Employee Plans have been established, registered,
administered, communicated and invested in all material respects
in accordance with all Laws. No fact or circumstance exists
which could adversely affect the registered status of any such
RBTT Employee Plan. Neither RBTT nor any of the RBTT
Subsidiaries, nor any of their respective agents or delegates,
has breached any fiduciary obligation with respect to the
administration or investment of any RBTT Employee Plan;
(B)
RBTT and the RBTT Subsidiaries have made all contributions and
paid all premiums in respect of each RBTT Employee Plan in a
timely fashion in accordance with the terms of each RBTT
Employee Plan and applicable Laws;
(C)
each RBTT Employee Plan that is a funded plan is fully funded on
both a going concern and solvency basis pursuant to the
actuarial assumptions and methodology utilized in the most
recent actuarial valuation for that RBTT Employee Plan;
(D)
other than routine claims for benefits, no RBTT Employee Plan is
subject to any pending action, investigation, examination, claim
(including claims for Taxes) or any other proceeding initiated
by any Person;
(E)
no insurance policy or any other agreement affecting any RBTT
Employee Plan requires or permits a retroactive increase in
contributions, premiums or other payments due under such
insurance policy or agreement;
(F)
none of the RBTT Employee Plans (other than pension plans)
provides for retiree benefits or for benefits to retired
employees or to the beneficiaries or dependants of retired
employees; and
(G)
none of the RBTT Employee Plans enjoys any special tax status
under any Laws, nor have any advance tax rulings been sought or
received in respect of any RBTT Employee Plan.
(t)
Insurance. RBTT maintains insurance policies
with recognized insurers as are appropriate to the business of
RBTT and the RBTT Subsidiaries in such amounts and against such
risks as are customarily carried and insured against by prudent
owners or operators of comparable businesses.
Section 3.1(t) of the RBTT Disclosure Letter contains a
correct and complete list of insurance policies maintained by
RBTT and the RBTT Material Subsidiaries, setting out, in respect
of each policy, the type of policy, the name of insurer, the
coverage allowance, the expiration date and any pending material
claims. All of the insurance policies maintained by RBTT and the
RBTT Material Subsidiaries are in full force and effect. To the
knowledge of RBTT, RBTT and the RBTT Material Subsidiaries are
not in material default with respect to any of the provisions
contained in any such insurance policy and have not failed to
give any notice or present any material claim under any such
insurance policy in due and timely fashion. Section 3.1(t)
of the RBTT Disclosure Letter sets out a true and complete list
of all material insurance claims involving RBTT and the RBTT
Material Subsidiaries.
(u)
Litigation. Except as described in
Section 3.1(u) of the RBTT Disclosure Letter, there are no
(i) actions, suits or proceedings, at law or in equity, by
any Person, (ii) grievances, arbitrations or alternative
dispute resolution processes, or (iii) administrative or
other proceedings by or before (or to the knowledge of RBTT any
investigation by) any Governmental Entity, pending, or, to the
knowledge of RBTT, threatened against RBTT or any of the RBTT
Material Subsidiaries, which are, individually or in the
aggregate material to RBTT and the RBTT Subsidiaries, taken as a
whole, and RBTT does not know of any valid basis for any such
action, complaint, grievance, suit, proceeding, arbitration or
investigation. Neither RBTT nor any of the RBTT Material
Subsidiaries is subject to any judgment, order, injunction,
stipulation, or decree entered in any material lawsuit or
proceeding, nor has RBTT or any of the RBTT Material
Subsidiaries settled any material claim prior to being
prosecuted in respect thereof. Except as disclosed in
Section 3.1(u) of the RBTT Disclosure Letter, neither RBTT
nor any of the RBTT Material Subsidiaries is the plaintiff or
complainant in any action, suit, proceeding, grievance,
arbitration or alternative dispute resolution process which is,
individually or in the aggregate, material to RBTT and the RBTT
Subsidiaries, taken as a whole.
(v)
Taxes. Except as described in
Section 3.1(v) of the RBTT Disclosure Letter, RBTT and each
RBTT Subsidiary has duly, and within any appropriate time
limits, made and filed all Tax Returns, given all notice and
supplied all other information required to be supplied to all
relevant Tax Authorities and has maintained all records required
to be maintained for Tax purposes, and all such information was
and remains complete and
accurate in all material respects and all such returns and
notices were and remain complete and accurate in all material
respects and were made on the proper basis and, to the knowledge
of RBTT, should not reveal any transactions which may be the
subject of any dispute with, or any enquiry raised by, any Tax
Authority.
Except as described in Section 3.1(v) of the RBTT
Disclosure Letter, all material Taxes that are required to have
been paid by RBTT and each RBTT Subsidiary prior to the date
hereof have been paid on a timely basis and all material Taxes
that are payable by or due from RBTT and each RBTT Subsidiary on
or after the date hereof in respect of all periods ending on or
before the Effective Time have been fully paid or fully
disclosed and fully provided for in the RBTT Financial
Statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles. Except as described in Section 3.1(v) of the RBTT
Disclosure Letter, there are no outstanding agreements or
waivers extending the statutory period providing for an
extension of time with respect to a reassessment of Taxes or the
filing of any Tax Return by, or any payment of Taxes by RBTT or
any of the RBTT Subsidiaries. There are no disputes pending, or
claims asserted or to the knowledge of RBTT, threatened for
Taxes owing by RBTT or an RBTT Subsidiary and no notices of
assessment or reassessment for which a material amount of Tax is
owing is currently outstanding and, to the knowledge of RBTT, no
examination of any Tax Return of RBTT or any of the RBTT
Subsidiaries is currently in progress. RBTT and each of the RBTT
Subsidiaries has, to the knowledge of RBTT, withheld and
collected all material amounts required by applicable Law to be
withheld or collected by it on account of Taxes and has remitted
all such amounts to the appropriate Governmental Entity within
the time prescribed under applicable Law.
(w)
Agreements with Regulators. Except as set
forth in Section 3.1(w) of the RBTT Disclosure Letter, neither
RBTT nor any of the RBTT Material Subsidiaries is a party to any
written agreement or memorandum of understanding with, or a
party to any commitment letter or similar undertaking to, or is
subject to any order or directive by, or is a recipient of any
extraordinary supervisory letter from, or has adopted any board
resolutions at the request of, any Governmental Entity
(including any Bank Regulator) which restrict materially the
conduct by RBTT or any of the RBTT Material Subsidiaries, or in
any manner relates to its capital adequacy, credit policies or
management, nor has RBTT or any of the RBTT Material
Subsidiaries been advised by any Governmental Entity (including
any Bank Regulator) that it is contemplating issuing or
requesting (or is considering the appropriateness of issuing or
requesting) any such order, decree, agreement, memorandum of
understanding, extraordinary supervisory letter, commitment
letter or similar submission, or any such board resolutions.
Except for normal examinations conducted by a Governmental
Entity (including any Bank Regulator) in the Ordinary Course of
the business of RBTT or any RBTT Material Subsidiary, no
Governmental Entity (including any Bank Regulator) has initiated
any proceeding or investigation into the business or operations
or financial reporting of RBTT or any RBTT Material Subsidiary
within the past three (3) years. There is no material
unresolved violation, criticism, comment letter or exception by
a Governmental Entity (including any Bank Regulator) with
respect to any such report or examination.
(x)
Fairness Opinion. Each of Credit Suisse
Securities (USA) LLC (“Credit Suisse”) and
Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner and Smith Incorporated
(“Merrill”) has delivered to the Board of
Directors of RBTT its written opinion (or oral opinion to be
confirmed in writing), dated as of the date hereof, that, as of
such date, the consideration payable to the holders of RBTT
Ordinary Shares in connection with the Amalgamation, as
described in the Amalgamation Agreement, is fair, from a
financial point of view, to the holders of RBTT Ordinary Shares.
(y)
Board Resolution. The Board of Directors of
RBTT has unanimously resolved that the Amalgamation is in the
best interests of RBTT Shareholders and that RBTT Shareholders
vote in favour of the RBTT Amalgamation Resolution.
(z)
Brokers and Finders. Other than Credit Suisse
and Merrill, none of RBTT or any of the RBTT Subsidiaries nor
any of their respective directors, officers or employees has
employed any agent, broker, investment banker or finder or
incurred any liability for any financial advisory fees,
brokerage fees, commissions or similar payments in connection
with the transactions contemplated by this Agreement.
Except as set out in Section 3.1(aa) of the RBTT Disclosure
Letter, the RBTT Financial Statements have been prepared in
accordance with IAS and IFRS applied on a basis consistent with
those of previous fiscal years, and present fairly in accordance
with IAS and IFRS, subject to the exceptions noted therein:
(A)
the consolidated assets, liabilities (whether accrued, absolute,
contingent or otherwise) and the financial position of RBTT and
the RBTT Subsidiaries as at the respective dates of the relevant
statements; and
(B)
the consolidated revenues and earnings of RBTT and the RBTT
Subsidiaries during the periods covered thereby.
True, correct and complete copies of RBTT Financial Statements
are attached as Section 3.1(aa) of the RBTT Disclosure
Letter.
(ii)
The RBTT Interim Financial Statements have been prepared in
accordance with IAS and IFRS applied on a basis consistent with
the preceding interim three-month period, and present fairly in
accordance with IAS and IFRS, subject to the absence of certain
note disclosure and to normal year-end adjustments required by
IAS and IFRS:
(A)
the consolidated assets, liabilities and the financial position
of RBTT and the RBTT Subsidiaries as at June 30,2007; and
(B)
the consolidated revenues and earnings of RBTT and the RBTT
Subsidiaries for the three month period ended June 30, 2007.
True, correct and complete copies of RBTT Interim Financial
Statements are attached as Section 3.1(aa) of the RBTT
Disclosure Letter.
(iii)
RBTT and the RBTT Subsidiaries have no liabilities or
obligations (whether accrued, absolute contingent or otherwise),
except:
(A)
liabilities disclosed, reflected or provided for, in the RBTT
Financial Statements;
(B)
liabilities and obligations incurred in the Ordinary Course of
business consistent with past practice and attributable to the
period since March 31, 2007; and
(C)
liabilities otherwise disclosed in this Agreement or in the RBTT
Disclosure Letter,
in each case, other than those liabilities or obligations which,
individually or in the aggregate, could not result in an RBTT
Material Adverse Effect.
(iv)
Except as disclosed in Section 3.1(aa)(iv) of the RBTT
Disclosure Letter, RBTT has established and maintained
disclosure and internal accounting controls and procedures which
have been designed to provide reasonable assurance, in the
judgment of the Board of Directors of RBTT, that:
(A)
material information relating to RBTT and the RBTT Subsidiaries,
is made known to the chief executive and chief financial
officers by others within those entities, particularly during
the period in which annual and interim filings are being
prepared;
(B)
all material transactions are executed in accordance with
management’s general or specific authorization; and
(C)
all material transactions are recorded as necessary to permit
the preparation of financial statements in conformity with IAS
and IFRS, consistently applied with respect to any criteria
applicable to such statements.
RBTT has received no (I) material complaints from any
source regarding accounting, internal accounting controls or
auditing matters, or (II) to the knowledge of RBTT,
expressions of concern from RBTT Employees regarding
questionable accounting or auditing matters; and
(B)
to the knowledge of RBTT, no attorney representing RBTT or any
of the RBTT Subsidiaries, whether or not employed by RBTT or any
of the RBTT Subsidiaries, has reported evidence of a
violation of securities Laws, breach of fiduciary duty or
similar violation by RBTT or any of the RBTT Subsidiaries or
their respective officers, directors, employees or agents to
RBTT’s chief legal officer, audit committee (or other
committee designated for the purpose) of the Board of Directors
of RBTT or to the Board of Directors of RBTT.
(bb)
Books and Records. The books, records and
accounts of RBTT and the RBTT Subsidiaries (i) have been
maintained in accordance with good business practices on a basis
consistent with prior years, (ii) are stated in reasonable
detail and accurately and fairly reflect in all material
respects the transactions and dispositions of the assets of RBTT
and the RBTT Subsidiaries, and (iii) accurately and fairly
reflect in all material respects the basis for the RBTT
financial statements.
(cc)
Risk Management.
(i)
All swaps, caps, floors, option agreements, futures and forward
contracts and other similar risk management arrangements,
whether entered into for RBTT’s own account, or for the
account of one or more of the RBTT Subsidiaries or their
customers, were entered into in accordance with prudent business
practices and all applicable Laws. Neither RBTT nor the RBTT
Subsidiaries, nor to RBTT’s knowledge any other party
thereto, is in breach of any of its obligations under any such
agreement or arrangement.
(ii)
RBTT and the RBTT Subsidiaries employ risk management policies,
practices and procedures which (A) are sufficient to
address the risks facing RBTT and the RBTT Subsidiaries,
(B) are consistent with prudent business and industry
practices, and (C) comply with all applicable Laws. RBTT
and the RBTT Subsidiaries have complied in all material respects
with such policies, practices and procedures.
(dd)
Loans and Investments.
(i)
Except as set forth in Section 3.1(dd) of the RBTT
Disclosure Letter, all extensions of credit and commitments to
extend credit by RBTT and the RBTT Subsidiaries (collectively,
“Loans”) originated by RBTT or any of the RBTT
Subsidiaries are evidenced by written documentation issued in
the Ordinary Course of business of RBTT or an RBTT Subsidiary.
Except as set forth in Section 3.1(dd) of the RBTT
Disclosure Letter, all Loans originated by RBTT or any RBTT
Subsidiary, and to the knowledge of RBTT, all Loans originated
by any Person other than RBTT or any RBTT Subsidiary, were
originated in material compliance with all applicable Laws and
in accordance with the customary lending standards of the
originator thereof, and the industry in which the originator
operated and in the Ordinary Course of the originator thereof.
In underwriting, purchasing, servicing, collecting and
discharging Loans, either for its account or the account of
others, RBTT and each RBTT Subsidiary has complied in all
material respects with all applicable Laws and has performed
such function in the Ordinary Course. Except as set forth in
Section 3.1(dd) of the RBTT Disclosure Letter, there are no
Loans or other assets of RBTT or any RBTT Subsidiary in a
principal amount in excess of $5,000,000 that have been
classified by examiners or otherwise as “Other Assets
Specially Mentioned”, “Substandard”,
“Doubtful”, “Loss” or words of similar
impact as of the date hereof.
(ii)
RBTT has previously delivered to RBC a true and complete list of
each investment in debt securities, mortgage backed and related
securities, marketable equity securities and securities
purchased under agreements to resell owned by RBTT or any RBTT
Subsidiary, showing as of July 31, 2007, the carrying
values and the gross carrying values of the mortgage backed and
related securities and the estimated cost of the marketable
equity securities.
(ee)
Investment Management and Related
Activities. Section 3.1(ee) of the RBTT
Disclosure Letter sets out a list of all registrations, licences
or authorizations held or required to be held by RBTT and the
RBTT Subsidiaries, and their respective directors, officers and
employees in connection with any services provided by such
Persons in their capacities as investment advisors, commodity
pool operators, futures commission merchants, brokers or similar
positions.
(ff)
Trust or Agency Agreements. Except as set
forth in Section 3.1(ff) of the RBTT Disclosure Letter:
(i)
to the knowledge of RBTT, neither RBTT nor any RBTT Subsidiary
has taken any action, nor omitted to take any action, which
would, or with the giving of notice or the passage of time or
both could, constitute a default or a violation of any fiduciary
duty under any Trust or Agency Agreement or cause RBTT or any
RBTT Subsidiary to be subject to claims for damages, surcharge,
disqualification or removal from
any capacity which any one of them now occupies with respect to
any Trust or Agency Agreement, nor has RBTT nor any RBTT
Subsidiary been so subject to claims for damages, surcharged,
disqualified or removed from any such capacity;
(ii)
no material claim has been made against RBTT or any RBTT
Subsidiary and no written notice has been received by RBTT or
any RBTT Subsidiary questioning the validity or enforceability
of any Trust or Agency Agreement or asserting any default or
violation of any duty thereunder; and
(iii)
to the knowledge of RBTT, (A) there has been no event of
default or violation of any duty by any other party to any Trust
or Agency Agreement, and (B) no event has occurred
(including the execution and delivery of this Agreement and the
consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby) which
would, or with the giving of notice or the passage of time or
both could, constitute a default or violation of any duty by any
other party to any Trust or Agency Agreement.
RBTT and each RBTT Subsidiary is eligible and qualified to act
under each Trust or Agency Agreement to which it is a party and
is not prohibited by applicable Law from performing its
respective duties and obligations under any Trust or Agency
Agreement.
(gg)
Trust or Agency Records. To the knowledge of RBTT, all
records maintained by RBTT and RBTT Subsidiaries relating to or
in connection with Trust or Agency Agreements (“Trust or
Agency Records”) have been kept in compliance with
RBTT’s customary practice, applicable Law and the
applicable Trust or Agency Agreement. RBTT and each RBTT
Subsidiary has maintained all Trust or Agency Records that it is
required to maintain pursuant to applicable Law or the
applicable Trust or Agency Agreement.
(hh)
Trust or Agency Standards.
(i)
The Trust or Agency Records are retained, protected and
duplicated in accordance with reasonable and customary industry
practices, and applicable legal and regulatory requirements.
RBTT or any RBTT Subsidiary, as the case may be, maintains a
system of internal accounting controls, policies and procedures
sufficient to make it reasonable to expect that (A) such
transactions are executed in accordance with management’s
general or specific authorizations, and (B) such
transactions are recorded in conformity in all material respects
with any applicable accounting principles and in such a manner
as to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance
with any applicable accounting principles and fiduciary
standards and any other criteria applicable to such statements
and to maintain accountability for assets.
(ii)
The data and transaction processing services of RBTT or any RBTT
Subsidiary, as the case may be, are of the quality generally
maintained by similar businesses and are adequate for the
performance of the business of RBTT or any RBTT Subsidiary, as
the case may be.
(ii)
Non-Arm’s Length Transactions.
(i)
All outstanding Loans and other contractual arrangements
(including deposit relationships, mortgages, pledge agreements,
or other similar commitments to extend credit) or compensation
arrangements between RBTT or any RBTT Subsidiary and any current
or former director, officer or employee of RBTT or any RBTT
Subsidiary or any registered or beneficial RBTT Shareholder
owning 5% or more of the RBTT Ordinary Shares (an
“Interested Person”) conform in all respects to
all applicable Laws and to all policies of RBTT and the RBTT
Subsidiaries which were in effect when such Loans and other
contractual arrangements were entered into.
(ii)
Except as set forth in Section 3.1(ii) of the RBTT
Disclosure Letter, no Interested Person: (A) has any
interest in any property, real or personal, tangible or
intangible, used in or pertaining to the business of RBTT or any
RBTT Subsidiary; or (B) has any cause of action or other
claim whatsoever against, or is owed any amount by RBTT or any
of the RBTT Subsidiaries, except for any liabilities reflected
in the RBTT Financial Statements and claims in the Ordinary
Course such as for accrued expense reimbursements, vacation pay
and benefits under any RBTT Employee Plans.
(iii)
Except as set out in Section 3.1(ii) of the RBTT Disclosure
Letter, since March 31, 2007 no payment has been made to
any Interested Person outside the Ordinary Course.
Section 3.1(jj) of the RBTT Disclosure Letter lists all
material agreements between (a) RBTT, on the one hand, and
any RBTT Subsidiary or Affiliate, on the other hand, and
(b) any RBTT Subsidiary, on the one hand, and any other
RBTT Subsidiary or any Affiliate of RBTT, on the other hand
(“Interbank Agreements”). To the knowledge of
RBTT, all Interbank Agreements are in compliance with all
applicable Laws.
(ii)
RBTT and the RBTT Subsidiaries are in full compliance with any
minimum capital requirements prescribed by (A) applicable
Law and, (B) to the extent applicable, any Bank Regulator
having jurisdiction over RBTT or any of the RBTT Subsidiaries.
Section 3.2 Disclaimer
of Additional Representations, Warranties or
Conditions.
RBC agrees and acknowledges that, except as set forth in this
Agreement, RBTT makes no representation, warranty or condition,
express or implied, at law or in equity, with respect to RBTT,
the RBTT Subsidiaries, their respective businesses, the past,
current or future financial condition or any of their assets,
liabilities or operations, or their past, current or future
profitability or performance, individually or in the aggregate,
and any such other representations, warranties or conditions are
hereby expressly disclaimed. Without limiting the generality of
the foregoing, RBTT
expressly disclaims any representation, warranty or condition
that is not set forth in this Agreement. No investigations made
by or on behalf of RBC at any time shall have the effect of
waiving, diminishing the scope of or otherwise affecting any
representation or warranty made by RBTT in or pursuant to this
Agreement.
ARTICLE 4
REPRESENTATIONS
AND WARRANTIES OF RBC
Section 4.1 Representations
and Warranties.
RBC represents and warrants to and in favour of RBTT as follows
and acknowledges that RBTT is relying upon the following
representations and warranties in connection with the entering
into of this Agreement:
Corporate
Matters
(a)
Incorporation and Qualification. RBC
(i) is a chartered bank duly established and validly
existing as a Schedule I Bank under the Bank Act
(Canada), and (ii) has the corporate power to lease,
own and operate the property leased, owned or operated by it and
to carry on its business as it is currently conducted and to
execute, deliver and perform its obligations under, this
Agreement.
(b)
Corporate Authorization. The execution and
delivery of and performance by RBC of this Agreement and each of
the Ancillary Agreements to which it is a party and the
consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby and thereby
have been, or, in the case of the Ancillary Agreements, will be
on or prior to the Effective Time, duly authorized by all
necessary corporate action on the part of RBC. No approval of
RBC Shareholders is required in connection with the execution
and delivery of and performance by RBC of this Agreement and
each of the Ancillary Agreements to which it is a party and the
consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby and thereby.
(c)
No Conflict. Except for the Regulatory
Approvals (including the Canadian Bank Approvals), the execution
and delivery of and performance by RBC, as the case may be, of
this Agreement and each of the Ancillary Agreements to which it
is a party:
(i)
do not and will not (or would not with the giving of notice, the
lapse of time or the happening of any other event or condition)
constitute or result in a violation or breach of, or conflict
with, or allow any other Person to exercise any rights under,
any of the terms or provisions of RBC’s constating
documents or by-laws;
(ii)
do not and will not (or would not with the giving of notice, the
lapse of time or the happening or any other event or condition)
constitute a material default under, result in a material breach
or violation of, or conflict with or allow any other Person to
exercise any rights under, any of the terms or provisions of any
RBC Material Contracts;
do not and will not result in a material breach of, or cause the
termination or revocation of, any material Authorization held by
RBC necessary to the operation of RBC’s business or the
businesses of the RBC Subsidiaries; and
(iv)
do not and will not result in the violation of any Law.
(d)
Issued Shares. The RBC Common Shares to be
issued to RBTT Shareholders pursuant to the Redemption shall be
duly and validly issued as fully paid, non-assessable and
freely-tradeable (subject to the restrictions provided for in
section 2.6 of National Instrument
45-102),
shares in the capital of RBC and shall have been issued in
compliance with all applicable Laws including applicable
securities Laws.
(e)
Required Authorizations. There is no
requirement that RBC or any RBC Material Subsidiary or Newco
make any filing with, give any notice to, or obtain any
Authorization of, any Governmental Entity as a condition to the
lawful completion of the transactions contemplated by this
Agreement, except for the Regulatory Approvals (including the
Canadian Bank Approvals) or those that relate solely to the
identity of RBTT or the nature of the business carried on by
RBTT prior to the Effective Time.
(f)
Required Consents. There is no requirement
under any RBC Material Contract to obtain any consent, approval
or waiver of any party thereto to any of the transactions
contemplated by this Agreement.
(g)
Execution and Binding Obligation. This
Agreement and each of the Ancillary Agreements to which RBC is a
party have been, or, in the case of the Ancillary Agreements,
will be on or prior to the Effective Time, duly executed and
delivered by RBC and constitute legal, valid and binding
agreements of it, enforceable against it in accordance with
their respective terms, subject to applicable bankruptcy,
insolvency, reorganization, moratorium and similar laws
affecting creditors’ rights generally and to general
principles of equity.
(h)
Authorized and Issued Capital. The authorized
capital of RBC consists of (i) an unlimited number of
common shares, of which as of September 27, 2007,
1,276,117,917 common shares (and no more) have been duly issued
and are outstanding as fully paid and non assessable and
(ii) an unlimited number of first and second preferred
shares without nominal or par value, with a maximum aggregate
consideration value equal to $20,000,000,000 and $5,000,000,000,
respectively, of which, as of September 27, 2007,
94,000,000 first preferred shares are issued and outstanding
with a face value of $2,350,000,000 and no second preferred
shares are issued and outstanding.
(i)
Newco. Prior to executing the Amalgamation
Agreement, (i) Newco will be a corporation duly
incorporated, validly existing and in good standing under the
laws of Trinidad and Tobago, (ii) Newco will have the
corporate power to lease, own and operate the property leased,
owned or operated by it and to carry on its business, and
(iii) Newco will be duly qualified or licensed to do
business and will be in good standing as a foreign corporation
or organization authorized to do business in all jurisdictions
in which the character of the properties owned or leased or the
nature of the business conducted by it would make such
qualification or licensing necessary. Immediately prior to the
Effective Time, Newco will have no assets or liabilities (other
than to RBC or its Affiliates) other than its rights and
obligations under the Ancillary Agreements and cash.
(j)
Public and Regulatory Filings. Since
October 31, 2006, RBC has filed all disclosure documents
required to be filed by RBC with the RBC Exchanges or pursuant
to applicable securities Laws (including on SEDAR) and such
disclosure documents complied, as of their respective dates, in
all material respects with applicable securities Laws and did
not contain a misrepresentation as of their respective date of
filing. RBC has filed all reports required by any Bank Regulator
as of the date of filing of such reports in all material
respects.
Financial
Matters
(k)
Financial Statements. The RBC Financial
Statements and the RBC Interim Financial Statements have been
prepared in accordance with Canadian GAAP applied on a basis
consistent with those of previous fiscal years, or the preceding
interim nine-month period in the case of the RBC Interim
Financial Statements, and each presents fairly in accordance
with Canadian GAAP, subject to the exceptions noted
therein and, in the case of the RBC Interim Financial
Statements, subject to the absence of certain note disclosure
and to normal year-end adjustments required under Canadian
GAAP:
(i)
the consolidated assets, liabilities and the financial position
of RBC as at the respective dates of the relevant
statements; and
(ii)
the consolidated revenues and earnings of RBC during the periods
covered thereby.
Financial Resources. RBC and the RBC
Subsidiaries have sufficient financial resources to permit them
to complete the transactions (including the payment of cash
consideration) contemplated by this Agreement.
Section 4.2 Disclaimer
of Additional Representations, Warranties and
Conditions.
RBTT agrees and acknowledges that, except as set forth in this
Agreement, RBC makes no representation, warranty or condition,
express or implied, at law or in equity, with respect to RBC,
the RBC Subsidiaries, their respective businesses, the past,
current or future financial condition or any of their assets,
liabilities or operations, or their past, current or future
profitability or performance, individually or in the aggregate,
and any such other representations, warranties or conditions are
hereby expressly disclaimed. Without limiting the generality of
the foregoing, RBC expressly disclaims any representation,
warranty or condition that is not set forth in this Agreement.
No investigations made by or on behalf of RBTT at any time shall
have the effect of waiving, diminishing the scope of or
otherwise affecting any representation or warranty made by RBC
in or pursuant to this agreement.
ARTICLE 5
COVENANTS
OF THE PARTIES
Section 5.1 RBTT
Circular; Shareholder Meeting.
RBTT shall prepare the RBTT Circular and all other required
documents in conformity with the requirements of applicable
Laws, and RBTT shall cause the RBTT Circular and other
documentation required in connection with the RBTT Meeting to be
sent to each RBTT Securityholder or other Person in accordance
with Section 2.5. RBTT shall provide RBC with a reasonable
opportunity to review and comment upon each draft of the RBTT
Circular (including each amendment and supplement thereto) and
all responses to requests, if any, for additional information
by, and replies to comments of, Governmental Entities or RBTT
Exchanges in connection therewith, prior to filing such drafts
or providing such responses or replies to any Governmental
Entity or RBTT Exchanges or distributing the RBTT Circular or
any amendment or supplement thereto to the RBTT Securityholders.
RBTT shall make any changes to such materials reasonably
requested by RBC to correct inaccurate or misleading information
pertaining to RBC, the RBC Subsidiaries, their officers,
directors, or Affiliates and the transactions contemplated
hereby, and shall make any other changes to such materials as
RBC may reasonably request in good faith, in each case prior to
the submission or distribution thereof.
Section 5.2 Consents
and Approvals.
(1)
From the date of this Agreement until the Effective Time, RBTT
shall use commercially reasonable efforts to obtain all
Regulatory Approvals applicable to the performance by it and the
RBTT Subsidiaries of this Agreement and the Ancillary Agreements
and the consummation by them of the transactions contemplated
hereby and thereby and RBTT shall use commercially reasonable
efforts to obtain all waivers, consents and approvals required
to be obtained by RBTT or an RBTT Subsidiary from other parties
to loan agreements, leases or other RBTT Contracts in connection
with the performance by it and the RBTT Subsidiaries of this
Agreement and the Ancillary Agreements and the consummation by
them of the transactions contemplated hereby and thereby,
provided however, that RBTT shall not (i) amend any RBTT
Material Contract without RBC’s prior consent, or
(ii) except with the prior written consent of RBC, make any
payment to any other Person (other than de minimis
payments) in order to obtain such waiver, consent or
approval.
(2)
Subject to Section 5.2(4), from the date of this Agreement
until the Effective Time, RBC shall use its commercially
reasonable efforts to obtain all Regulatory Approvals applicable
to the performance by RBC and the RBC Subsidiaries of this
Agreement and the Ancillary Agreements and the consummation by
them of the transactions contemplated hereby and thereby and RBC
shall use commercially reasonable efforts to obtain all
necessary waivers, consents and approvals required to be
obtained by RBC or an RBC Subsidiary from other parties to loan
agreements, leases or other RBC Contracts in connection with the
performance by RBC and the RBC Subsidiaries of this Agreement
and the Ancillary Agreements and the consummation by them of the
transactions contemplated hereby and thereby, provided however,
that nothing contained in this Agreement shall require RBC to
make any payment to any other Person (other than de
minimis payments) in order to obtain such waiver, consent or
approval.
(3)
Subject to Section 5.2(4), each Party shall promptly make
all filings, notices, registrations, applications, statements
and reports to all Governmental Entities that are required to be
made prior to the Effective Time by or on behalf of such Party
pursuant to any applicable Laws or Contracts in connection with
this Agreement, the
Ancillary Agreements and the transactions contemplated hereby
and thereby. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing,
and other than in respect of the Canadian Bank Approvals, the
Parties shall co-operate with one another: (i) in the
prompt notification and meeting with any appropriate
Governmental Entity; (ii) by providing one another with
drafts of any submission to any Governmental Entity and
permitting the other Party a reasonable opportunity to comment
upon such drafts; (iii) in determining whether action by or
in respect of, or filing with, any Governmental Entity is
required, proper or advisable or any actions, consents, waivers
or approvals are required to be obtained from parties to any
Contracts in connection with the transactions contemplated by
this Agreement or the Ancillary Agreements; (iv) in keeping
the other Party apprised of communications to or from
Governmental Entities; (v) with respect to the submission,
prosecution or obtaining of the Regulatory Approvals; and
(vi) in seeking timely to obtain any such Regulatory
Approvals.
(4)
Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, RBC shall
not be required to seek any Regulatory Approval or make any
filing, notice, registration, application, or statement to any
Governmental Entity relating to the issuance of the RBC Common
Shares (other than in connection with the listing of the RBC
Common Shares on the RBC Exchanges) if the terms and conditions
of such Regulatory Approval, filing, notice, registration,
application or statement is not satisfactory to RBC, in its sole
discretion, including with respect to any terms and conditions
relating to RBC’s continuous disclosure obligations,
RBC’s financial reporting, and any listing fees or similar
costs, and, in particular, there shall be no requirement (or if
applicable Laws or stock exchange rules provide for such a
requirement, RBC shall have been exempted therefrom) that RBC
(A) issue or qualify a prospectus, registration statement
or similar document in any jurisdiction in connection with the
issuance of the RBC Common Shares, or (B) report or
reconcile its financial statements in accordance with IAS and
IFRS.
Section 5.3 Covenants
of RBTT.
(1)
RBTT covenants and agrees that, until the Effective Time or the
earlier termination of this Agreement in accordance with
Article 7, except (i) with the prior written consent
of RBC to any variation therefrom, which shall not be
unreasonably withheld or delayed; or (ii) with respect to
any deviation from the following covenants specifically required
by this Agreement, the Ancillary Agreements or the Amalgamation,
RBTT will, and will cause the RBTT Material Subsidiaries to:
(a)
carry on its and their business in the Ordinary Course and use
all commercially reasonable efforts to preserve intact its
present business organization, customers and clients and keep
available the services of such of its present officers and
employees and others having business dealings with it as is
required to maintain the goodwill of its business and carry on
its business in the Ordinary Course;
(b)
not split, combine or reclassify any of the outstanding shares
of RBTT;
(c)
not declare, set aside or pay any dividends on or make any other
distributions of any kind (whether in cash, securities or other
property,) on or in respect of the outstanding RBTT Ordinary
Shares or other securities of RBTT, other than semi-annual
dividends paid in the Ordinary Course of business consistent
with past practice, in each case in an amount not exceeding
45.3% of RBTT’s net after-tax earnings from operations for
the prior six month period;
(d)
not amend the articles or by-laws of RBTT or amend the articles
or by-laws of any RBTT Material Subsidiary;
(e)
not sell, pledge, encumber, allot, reserve, set aside or issue,
authorize or propose the sale, pledge, encumbrance, allotment,
reservation, setting aside or issuance of, or directly or
indirectly purchase or redeem or propose the purchase or
redemption of, any shares in its capital stock or that of any
RBTT Subsidiary or any class of securities convertible or
exchangeable into, or rights, warrants or options to acquire,
any such shares or other convertible or exchangeable securities,
except for (i) RBTT Affiliate Transactions provided that
such RBTT Affiliate Transactions do not involve the issuance of
any shares in the capital stock of RBTT or any class of
securities convertible or exchangeable into, or rights, warrants
or options to acquire, any such shares, and (ii) the
issuance of RBTT Ordinary Shares pursuant to the exercise of
fully vested RBTT Options granted prior to the date hereof in
accordance with the terms of such RBTT Options in effect as of
the date hereof, provided that no exercises of RBTT Options
shall be permitted from and after the date that is five
(5) Business Days prior to the Closing Date;
not, whether through its Board of Directors or otherwise,
accelerate the vesting of any unvested RBTT Options or grant
RBTT Options or otherwise amend, vary or modify the RBTT Options
or the RBTT Option Plan, provided, however, that RBTT shall be
entitled to implement the RBTT Option Plan Amendment
contemplated by Section 2.1(c);
(g)
not reorganize, amalgamate or merge RBTT or any of the RBTT
Subsidiaries with any other Person;
(h)
not acquire (by amalgamation, merger, consolidation, acquisition
of shares or assets or otherwise) another Person or division
thereof (other than pursuant to an RBTT Affiliate Transaction
and, in such case, only after consultation with RBC) or make any
investment (by the purchase of shares or securities,
contribution of capital, property transfer, purchase of any
property or assets of any other Person or division (other than
pursuant to an RBTT Affiliate Transaction and, in such case,
only after consultation with RBC) thereof or otherwise) if:
(i)
the total amount expended by RBTT and all RBTT Subsidiaries,
together with the total amount of all indebtedness or other
obligations incurred by RBTT and all RBTT Subsidiaries, in
respect thereof would exceed 5% of RBTT’s total equity as
reflected on RBTT’s latest audited balance sheet available
at the relevant time; or
(ii)
if such acquisition would reasonably be expected to materially
delay the consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby;
(i)
except (i) with respect to the sale of assets of RBTT or
any RBTT Material Subsidiary in the Ordinary Course or
(ii) pursuant to an RBTT Affiliate Transaction made after
prior consultation with RBC, not sell, pledge, encumber, lease
or otherwise dispose of any material assets;
(j)
not, other than as required by Law or the terms of any
employment, collective, severance, pension, supplemental
pension, profit sharing, benefit, termination, compensation, or
similar Contracts, arrangements or policies with or for the
benefit of any officers, directors or employees of RBTT or any
RBTT Subsidiary (collectively, “RBTT Labour and
Employment Arrangements”) in existence on the date of
this Agreement, enter into, adopt, implement or become subject
to or materially modify any such existing RBTT Labour and
Employment Arrangement or any Severance or Change of Control
Plan, or grant any bonuses, wage or salary increases, pension or
supplemental pension benefits, employee benefits, profit
sharing, retirement allowances, deferred compensation, incentive
compensation, severance or termination pay to, or make any loan
to, any of its officers, directors or employees, except to the
extent that such actions are consistent with past practices
regarding employee wages and benefits in the Ordinary Course,
provided, however, that neither RBTT nor any RBTT Subsidiary
shall hire, terminate or sever or enter into or amend any
agreements with any RBTT Employee who holds the position of
General Manager or higher or whose total annual compensation is
greater than $350,000;
(k)
not: (i) discharge or satisfy any Liability prior to the
same being due, except (A) in the Ordinary Course or
(B) such as has been specifically reserved against in the
financial statements of RBTT and the RBTT Material Subsidiaries,
which are, individually or in the aggregate, material;
(ii) grant any waiver, exercise any option or relinquish
any contractual rights which are, individually or in the
aggregate, material; or (iii) except in the Ordinary Course
of business, enter into, cancel or amend any interest rate,
currency or commodity swaps, hedges or other similar financial
instruments or arrangements;
(l)
use commercially reasonable efforts to cause its current
insurance (or re-insurance) policies not to be cancelled or
terminated or any of the coverage thereunder to lapse, unless
simultaneously with such termination, cancellation or lapse,
replacement policies underwritten by insurance and re-insurance
companies of internationally recognized good standing providing
coverage equal to or greater than the coverage under the
cancelled, terminated or lapsed policies for substantially
similar premiums are in full force and effect;
(m)
not terminate, amend or modify in any material respect any
existing RBTT Material Contract or enter into any new RBTT
Material Contract, except:
(i)
in the Ordinary Course of business,
(ii)
as set forth in Section 5.3(1)(m) of the RBTT Disclosure
Letter, or
not make any change, other than as required by IAS or IFRS, to
its accounting principles;
(o)
not (A) enter into any new line of business which is not a
financial service or (B) change in any material respect its
lending, investment, underwriting, risk and asset liability
management and other banking and operating, securitization and
servicing policies, except as required by applicable Laws or in
the Ordinary Course of business;
(p)
not acquire any equity securities of RBC or any RBC Subsidiary;
(q)
not initiate, settle or compromise any (i) material claim,
litigation or arbitration proceeding (other than a settlement or
compromise of litigation providing solely for the payment of
monetary damages where the amount paid in settlement or
compromise does not exceed $5,000,000, and which provides for a
complete release of RBTT and the RBTT Subsidiaries of all claims
and which does not provide for any admission or liability by
RBTT or any of the RBTT Subsidiaries), or (ii) claim,
litigation or arbitration proceeding brought by any present,
former or purported holder of any of the securities of RBTT or
any of the RBTT Subsidiaries in connection with the transactions
contemplated hereby;
(r)
not prepay, refinance or otherwise amend any existing long-term
indebtedness of RBTT or the RBTT Subsidiaries or incur any new
material long-term indebtedness except under existing facilities;
(s)
not enter into any underwriting or similar commitment except
with respect to (i) debt securities which are rated BB- or
lower by Moody’s or the equivalent rating by another
reputable rating agency, or in the absence of same, the
equivalent rating of RBTT’s Borrower Risk Rating
classification, involving a potential liability of less than
$50,000,000, or (ii) debt securities which are rated BB or
higher by Moody’s or the equivalent rating by another
reputable rating agency, or in the absence of same, the
equivalent rating of RBTT’s Borrower Risk Rating
classification, involving a potential liability of less than
$100,000,000;
(t)
not enter into any agreement to do any of the foregoing
prohibited matters; and
(u)
promptly advise RBC orally and, if then requested, in writing:
(i)
of any event occurring subsequent to the date of this Agreement
that would render any representation or warranty of RBTT
contained in this Agreement (except any such representation or
warranty which speaks as of a date prior to the occurrence of
such event), if made on or as of the date of such event or the
Effective Time, untrue or inaccurate in any material respect or,
in the case of any representation or warranty qualified by
“material” or “Material Adverse Effect”,
untrue or inaccurate in any respect;
(ii)
of any RBTT Material Adverse Effect; and
(iii)
of any material breach by RBTT of any covenant or agreement
contained in this Agreement.
(2)
RBTT shall and shall cause the RBTT Subsidiaries to perform all
obligations required or desirable to be performed by RBTT or any
of the RBTT Subsidiaries under or in respect of this Agreement
or the Ancillary Agreements or the transactions contemplated
hereby and thereby, co-operate with RBC in connection therewith,
and do all such other acts and things as may be necessary or
desirable in order to consummate and make effective, as soon as
reasonably practicable, the transactions contemplated in this
Agreement and the Ancillary Agreements and, without limiting the
generality of the foregoing, RBTT shall and where appropriate
shall cause the RBTT Subsidiaries to:
(a)
defend, in consultation with RBC, all lawsuits or other legal,
regulatory or other proceedings challenging or affecting this
Agreement or the consummation of the transactions contemplated
hereby;
(b)
use commercially reasonable efforts to have lifted or rescinded
any injunction or restraining order or other order which may
adversely affect the ability of the Parties to consummate the
transactions contemplated hereby;
(c)
advise RBC as reasonably requested, and on a daily basis on each
of the last five (5) Business Days prior to the RBTT
Meeting, as to the aggregate tally of the proxies and votes
received in respect of the RBTT Meeting and all matters to be
considered at such meeting, and deliver to, or cause to be
delivered to RBC, promptly upon reasonable request being made,
lists of all registered and beneficial RBTT
Securityholders and any holders of securities convertible into
RBTT Ordinary Shares, showing the securities positions of such
holders and such other information and assistance as RBC may
reasonably request in connection with the consummation of the
transactions contemplated hereby; and
(d)
provide RBC with a copy of any purported exercise of dissent
rights in connection with the transactions contemplated hereby
and written communications with any RBTT Shareholders exercising
or purporting to exercise dissent rights.
(3)
RBTT agrees that it will (i) consider any good faith
proposals made by RBC to reorganize the business, operations and
assets of RBTT and the RBTT Subsidiaries (each a
“Pre-Combination Reorganization”) and
(ii) co-operate with RBC and its advisors in order to
determine the nature of each Pre-Combination Reorganization that
might be undertaken and the manner in which it might most
effectively be undertaken. If the Amalgamation is not completed,
RBC shall reimburse RBTT for all reasonable costs and expenses,
including reasonable legal fees and disbursements, incurred in
connection with the consideration of any proposed
Pre-Combination Reorganization.
Section 5.4 Covenants
of RBC.
(1)
RBC covenants and agrees that, until the Effective Time or the
earlier termination of this Agreement in accordance with
Article 7, except (i) with the consent of RBTT to any
variation therefrom, which shall not be unreasonably withheld or
delayed; or (ii) with respect to any deviation from the
following covenants specifically contemplated or required by
this Agreement, the Ancillary Agreements or the Amalgamation,
RBC will, and will cause the RBC Subsidiaries to:
(a)
not acquire as principal any equity securities of RBTT or any
RBTT Subsidiary except securities acquired in the Ordinary
Course which shall not exceed in the aggregate 2% of the
outstanding equity securities of RBTT or an RBTT Subsidiary;
(b)
use commercially reasonable efforts to have the RBC Common
Shares listed on the RBC Exchanges as at the Effective
Time; and
(c)
promptly advise RBTT orally and, if then requested, in writing:
(i)
of any event occurring subsequent to the date of this Agreement
that would render any representation or warranty of RBC
contained in this Agreement (except any such representation or
warranty which speaks as of a date prior to the occurrence of
such event), if made on or as of the date of such event or the
Effective Time, untrue or inaccurate in any material respect or,
in the case of any representation or warranty qualified by
“material” or “Material Adverse Effect”,
untrue or inaccurate in any respect;
(ii)
of any RBC Material Adverse Effect; and
(iii)
of any material breach by RBC of any covenant or agreement
contained in this Agreement.
(2)
RBC shall, and RBC shall cause the RBC Subsidiaries (including
Newco) to, perform all obligations required or desirable to be
performed by RBC or any of the RBC Subsidiaries under or in
respect of this Agreement or the Ancillary Agreements or the
transactions contemplated hereby and thereby, co-operate with
RBTT in connection therewith, and do all such other acts and
things as may be necessary or desirable in order to consummate
and make effective, as soon as reasonably practicable, the
transactions contemplated by this Agreement and the Ancillary
Agreements.
Section 5.5 Consummation
of Transaction.
Each of RBTT and RBC shall not and shall cause its subsidiaries
not to enter into or complete any transactions nor will they
enter into any Contracts or take any other action that could
reasonably be expected to materially delay or hinder the
transactions contemplated hereby, or preclude any Regulatory
Approval or cause the failure of any condition to the
obligations of the Parties hereunder to be satisfied.
Section 5.6 Certain
Restrictions on RBTT.
(a)
Subject to Section 5.7, RBTT shall not, directly or
indirectly, through any director, officer, employee,
representative or agent of RBTT or any of the RBTT Subsidiaries,
(i) solicit, initiate, encourage or facilitate (including
by way of furnishing information or entering into any form of
any Contract) the initiation of any
inquiries or proposals regarding or which may reasonably be
expected to lead to, an actual or potential RBTT Acquisition
Proposal, (ii) participate in any discussions or
negotiations regarding any actual or potential RBTT Acquisition
Proposal, (iii) withdraw, modify or qualify (or publicly
propose to withdraw, modify or qualify) in a manner adverse to
RBC the approval recommendation of the Board of Directors of
RBTT of the Amalgamation or the other transactions contemplated
hereby, (iv) authorize, approve or recommend (or propose
publicly to authorize, approve or recommend) or remain neutral
with respect to any RBTT Acquisition Proposal, or (v) enter
into any Contract related to any RBTT Acquisition Proposal.
Notwithstanding the preceding part of this Section 5.6(a)
but subject to the further provisions of this Section 5.6,
nothing contained in this Agreement shall prevent the Board of
Directors of RBTT prior to the approval by the RBTT Shareholders
of the RBTT Amalgamation Resolution from considering,
participating in any discussions or negotiations, or entering
into a confidentiality agreement and providing information
pursuant to Section 5.6(c), regarding a bona fide written
RBTT Acquisition Proposal if and only to the extent that
(i) such RBTT Acquisition Proposal did not result from a
breach of this Section 5.6; and (ii) the Board of
Directors of RBTT determines in good faith in the exercise of
the fiduciary duties of the members of such Board, after
consultation with its financial advisors and outside legal
counsel, that such RBTT Acquisition Proposal constitutes or
would be reasonably likely to constitute, if consummated in
accordance with its terms, an RBTT Superior Proposal.
(b)
RBTT shall promptly (and in any event within 24 hours)
notify RBC at first orally and then in writing, of the receipt
by it of any RBTT Acquisition Proposal or of any proposal,
inquiry or offer that would reasonably be expected to lead to an
RBTT Acquisition Proposal, or any amendments to the foregoing,
or any request for information relating to RBTT or any of the
RBTT Subsidiaries in connection with an RBTT Acquisition
Proposal or that would reasonably be expected to lead to an RBTT
Acquisition Proposal or for access to the properties, books or
records of RBTT or any of the RBTT Subsidiaries by any Person
that informs RBTT or such RBTT Subsidiary that it is considering
making, or has made, an RBTT Acquisition Proposal or an inquiry
that would reasonably be expected to lead to an RBTT Acquisition
Proposal. Such notice shall include a description of the
material terms and conditions of any proposal and the identity
of the Person making such proposal and shall provide such other
details of the proposal as RBC may reasonably request. RBTT
shall (i) keep RBC promptly and fully informed of the
status, including any change to any of the terms of any such
RBTT Acquisition Proposal and (ii) provide to RBC as soon
as practicable after receipt or delivery thereof with copies of
all written material sent or provided to RBTT or any of the RBTT
Subsidiaries from or to any Person in connection with any RBTT
Acquisition Proposal or sent or provided by RBTT to any Person
in connection with any RBTT Acquisition Proposal.
(c)
If RBTT receives a request for material non-public information
from a Person who has made a bona fide, unsolicited written RBTT
Acquisition Proposal and the Board of Directors of RBTT
determines in good faith in the exercise of the fiduciary duties
of the members of such Board, after consultation with the
Board’s financial advisors and outside legal counsel, that
such RBTT Acquisition Proposal constitutes or would be
reasonably likely to constitute, if consummated in accordance
with its terms, an RBTT Superior Proposal, then, and only in
such case, the Board of Directors of RBTT may, subject to such
Person having executed a confidentiality agreement containing
confidentiality and standstill provisions substantially similar
to those contained in the Confidentiality Agreement, provide
such Person with access to information regarding RBTT; provided,
however, that the Person making the RBTT Acquisition Proposal
shall not be precluded under such confidentiality or standstill
agreement if entered into after the date of this Agreement from
making the RBTT Acquisition Proposal and RBC is provided with a
copy of such confidentiality agreement, together with a list of
or copies of the written material provided to such Person and
immediately provided with access to similar written material to
which such Person was provided unless previously provided to RBC.
(d)
RBTT shall, and shall cause the RBTT Subsidiaries to,
immediately cease and terminate any existing solicitation,
initiation, encouragement, activity, discussion or negotiation
with any parties conducted heretofore by RBTT, any RBTT
Subsidiary or their advisors or representatives with respect to
any RBTT Acquisition Proposal.
(e)
RBTT shall ensure that its directors and executive officers and
those of the RBTT Subsidiaries and any financial or other
advisors or representatives retained by it or the RBTT
Subsidiaries are aware of the provisions of this
Section 5.6, and it shall be responsible for any breach of
this Section 5.6 by such directors, executive officers,
advisors and representatives.
RBTT shall (i) require all Persons other than RBC who have
been furnished with confidential information regarding RBTT or
the RBTT Subsidiaries in connection with the solicitation of or
discussion regarding any RBTT Acquisition Proposal within
12 months prior to the date hereof promptly to return or
destroy such information, in accordance with and subject to the
terms of the confidentiality agreement entered into with such
Persons; (ii) terminate access for all Persons (other than
RBC and its representatives) of the electronic dataroom
accessible through the Intralinks website; and (iii) not
amend, modify, waive or fail to enforce any of the standstill
terms or other conditions included in any of the confidentiality
agreements between RBTT and any third parties.
Section 5.7 Notice
of Superior Proposal Determination.
(a)
Notwithstanding Section 5.6, RBTT may authorize, accept,
approve, recommend (or change or withdraw its recommendation in
respect of the Amalgamation) or enter into any Contract, in
respect of an RBTT Superior Proposal prior to the approval by
the RBTT Shareholders of the RBTT Amalgamation Resolution and
terminate this Agreement if, and only if, (i) it has
provided RBC with a copy of the RBTT Superior Proposal document,
(ii) ten (10) Business Days (the “Matching
Period”) shall have elapsed from the later of
(A) the date RBC received written notice (the
“Superior Proposal Notice”) advising RBC
that RBTT’s Board of Directors has resolved, subject only
to compliance with this Section 5.7(a) and termination of
this Agreement, to otherwise accept, approve, recommend (or
change, withdraw, modify or qualify its recommendation in
respect of the Amalgamation) or enter into a Contract in respect
of such RBTT Superior Proposal, specifying the terms and
conditions of such RBTT Superior Proposal and identifying the
Person making such RBTT Superior Proposal, and (B) the date
RBC receives a copy of the RBTT Superior Proposal document,
(iii) taking into account any revised proposal made by RBC
since receipt of the Superior Proposal Notice, the Board of
Directors of RBTT determines in good faith in the exercise of
the fiduciary duties of the members of such Board, after
consultation with its financial advisors and outside legal
counsel, that such RBTT Superior Proposal remains an RBTT
Superior Proposal, and (iv) RBTT has previously or
concurrently will have (A) paid to RBC the termination
payment payable under Section 7.2 and (B) terminated
this Agreement pursuant to Section 7.1.
(b)
During such Matching Period, RBTT agrees that RBC shall have the
right, but not the obligation, to offer to amend the terms of
this Agreement. The Board of Directors of RBTT will review any
offer by RBC to amend the terms of this Agreement in good faith
in order to determine, in the exercise of the fiduciary duties
of the members of such Board, whether RBC’s offer upon
acceptance by RBTT would result in such RBTT Superior Proposal
ceasing to be an RBTT Superior Proposal. If the Board of
Directors of RBTT so determines, it will promptly enter into an
amended agreement with RBC reflecting RBC’s amended
proposal. If the Board of Directors of RBTT continues to
believe, in good faith and after consultation with financial
advisors and outside counsel, that such RBTT Superior Proposal
remains an RBTT Superior Proposal and therefore rejects
RBC’s amended proposal, RBTT shall promptly notify RBC of
such determination and may terminate this Agreement pursuant to
Section 7.1(3)(e); provided, however, that RBTT must
concurrently pay to RBC the termination payment payable to RBC
under Section 7.2 and must concurrently with termination
enter into a definitive agreement with respect to such RBTT
Superior Proposal. RBTT also acknowledges and agrees that each
successive modification of any RBTT Acquisition Proposal shall
constitute a new RBTT Acquisition Proposal for purposes of
Section 5.6(a) and the requirement under Section 5.7(a) to
initiate an additional ten (10) Business Days’
Matching Period.
(c)
If the expiry of the Matching Period falls on a date which is
less than ten (10) Business Days prior to the RBTT Meeting,
RBTT shall, at the request of RBC, adjourn or postpone the RBTT
Meeting to a date which is not more than ten (10) Business
Days following such expiry date.
(d)
Nothing in this Section 5.7 shall in any way limit the
obligation of RBTT to convene and hold the RBTT Meeting unless
this Agreement is terminated in accordance with Section 7.1.
Section 5.8 Access
to Information.
(1)
Subject to applicable Laws, upon reasonable request and subject
to all reasonable security and confidentiality arrangements
having been entered into and without undue interference to the
business of RBTT, RBTT shall (and shall cause each of the RBTT
Subsidiaries to) afford RBC’s officers, employees, counsel,
accountants and other authorized representatives and advisors
access, during normal business hours from the date hereof
and until the earlier of the Effective Time or the termination
of this Agreement, to its properties, books, contracts and
records, as well as to its management personnel and will use
commercially reasonable efforts to afford access to its
accountants, counsel, and other advisors, and, during such
period, RBTT shall (and shall cause each of the RBTT
Subsidiaries to) furnish promptly to RBC all information
concerning RBTT’s and the RBTT Subsidiaries’ business,
properties and personnel as RBC may reasonably request.
(2)
Nothing in the foregoing shall require RBTT to disclose to RBC
information subject to a written confidentiality agreement with
third parties or customer-specific or competitively sensitive
information.
Section 5.9 Stock
Exchange Listings.
(1)
RBC shall use commercially reasonable efforts to obtain the
approval of the RBC Exchanges for the listing of the RBC Common
Shares to be issued in connection with the transactions
contemplated by this Agreement.
(2)
RBTT, in consultation with RBC, shall take such action as may be
required in order to cause the RBTT Ordinary Shares to be
de-listed from each of the RBTT Exchanges, effective at or prior
to the Effective Time.
Section 5.10 Publicity.
RBTT and RBC agree to make a joint press release with respect to
this Agreement and the transactions contemplated hereby as soon
as practicable after the date hereof. RBTT and RBC further agree
to consult with each other as to the general nature of any news
releases or public statements with respect to this Agreement or
the Amalgamation, including providing as much notice to the
other Party of any proposed news releases or public statement as
is reasonably possible and using commercially reasonable efforts
to enable the other Party to review and comment on all such news
releases or public statements prior to the release thereof, in
each case, subject to applicable Laws and the exercise of such
fiduciary duties, as may be appropriate.
Section 5.11 Expenses.
Except as otherwise expressly provided in this Agreement, each
Party will pay for its own costs and expenses incurred in
connection with this Agreement, the Ancillary Agreements and the
transactions contemplated hereby or thereby. The costs and
expenses referred to in this Section 5.11 include those
which are incurred in connection with the negotiation,
preparation, execution and performance of this Agreement, and
the transactions contemplated by this Agreement, including the
fees and expenses of legal counsel, investment advisors and
accountants.
Section 5.12 Indemnities
and Insurance.
(1)
All rights to indemnification or exculpation now existing in
favour of the directors or officers of RBTT or any the RBTT
Subsidiaries as provided in its articles of incorporation or
by-laws in effect on the date hereof shall survive the
Amalgamation and shall continue in full force and effect for a
period of not less than six (6) years from the Effective
Time and the company resulting from the Amalgamation shall
assume, effective upon consummation of the Amalgamation, all
such liability with respect to any matters arising prior to the
Effective Time.
(2)
RBC shall maintain or cause to be maintained in effect, for not
less than six (6) years from the Effective Time, coverage
of no less than $15 million for each individual covered
under the policies of the directors’ and officers’
liability insurance maintained by RBTT as of the date of this
Agreement, which coverage is no less advantageous, and with no
gaps or lapses in coverage with respect to matters occurring
prior to the Effective Time, provided that in no event shall RBC
be required to expend in any one year an amount in excess of
200% of the annual amount currently paid by RBTT, and if the
annual premiums of such insurance coverage exceed such amount,
RBC shall be obligated only to obtain a substantially similar
policy with the greatest coverage available (as to quantum and
events) for such maximum cost. Alternatively, at RBC’s
option, it may (i) substitute such insurance policies, or
(ii) purchase or cause to be purchased “run-off”
directors’ and officers’ liability insurance, provided
that, in each case, such insurance provides coverage
substantially as favourable to such directors and officers as
that in effect under such current policies to cover prior events
during such six year period or the balance thereof.
(3)
The provisions of this Section 5.12 are intended to be for
the benefit of, and will be enforceable by, each individual
referred to therein, his or her heirs and successors and his or
her legal representatives, and, for such purpose, RBTT hereby
confirms that it is acting as agent and trustee on their behalf.
Furthermore, the provisions of this Section 5.12 shall
survive the Effective Time.
RBTT shall use commercially reasonable efforts to obtain and
deliver to RBC at the Effective Time evidence reasonably
satisfactory to RBC of the resignation effective as of the
Effective Time of such designee directors of RBTT on the boards
of directors of non-wholly owned RBTT Subsidiaries as RBC may
specify.
Section 5.14 Waiver
of Standstill.
Subject to Section 5.4(1)(a), RBTT hereby waives the
standstill provisions contained in the Confidentiality Agreement
with respect to RBC. In all other respects, the provisions of
the Confidentiality Agreement shall continue to apply
notwithstanding the execution of this Agreement by the Parties
or the announcement of the transactions contemplated hereby.
ARTICLE 6
CONDITIONS
OF CLOSING
Section 6.1 Mutual
Conditions Precedent.
The respective obligations of the Parties to complete the
transactions contemplated by this Agreement shall be subject to
the satisfaction, on or before the Closing Date of the following
conditions precedent, each of which may only be waived by the
mutual consent of each of the Parties:
(a)
Required RBTT Vote. The Required RBTT Vote
shall have been obtained.
(b)
Certificate of Amalgamation. The Certificate
of Amalgamation shall have been issued by the Registrar.
(c)
Regulatory Approvals. The Regulatory Approvals
(other than the Canadian Bank Approvals) shall have been
obtained or satisfied on terms and conditions satisfactory to
the Parties, acting reasonably.
(d)
Canadian Bank Approvals. The Canadian Bank
Approvals shall have been obtained.
(e)
No Judgements, etc. There shall not be in
force any final and non-appealable judgement, injunction, order
or decree, and there shall not have been passed any Law
prohibiting, preventing, restraining or enjoining the
consummation of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement,
and there shall be no proceeding in progress instituted by a
Governmental Entity that relates to or results from the
transactions contemplated by this Agreement that would, if
successful, result in an order or ruling of a Governmental
Entity that would preclude completion of the transactions
contemplated by this Agreement in accordance with the terms
hereof.
(f)
Outside Date. The Closing Date shall have
occurred by the Outside Date.
(g)
RBC Common Shares. The RBC Common Shares
issuable pursuant to the Redemption (i) shall be duly
authorized by all corporate action necessary to approve the
issuance thereof, including with any applicable securities
commission or other Governmental Entity and all consents,
approvals and notices required in connection therewith shall
have been obtained or made, (ii) shall be subject to no
resale restrictions (other than those restrictions provided for
in section 2.6 of National Instrument
45-102), and
(iii) shall have been approved for listing on the RBC
Exchanges, subject to notice of issuance.
Section 6.2 Conditions
for the Benefit of RBTT.
The obligations of RBTT to complete the transactions
contemplated by this Agreement shall also be subject to the
fulfilment of each of the following additional conditions
precedent (each of which is for RBTT’s exclusive benefit
and may be waived by RBTT):
(a)
Truth of Representations and Warranties —
RBC. The representations and warranties of RBC
contained in this Agreement (without giving effect to any
materiality (including the word “material” or
“RBC Material Adverse Effect”) qualification) shall be
true and correct as of the Closing Date with the same effect as
if made at and as of the Closing Date (other than such
representations that are made as of a specified date, which
shall be true and correct as of such date), except as would not
reasonably be expected to have, individually or in the
aggregate, an RBC Material Adverse Effect; and RBTT shall have
received a certificate from RBC addressed to RBTT and dated the
Closing Date, signed on behalf of RBC by two senior executive
officers of RBC confirming the same as at the Closing Date.
Performance of Covenants. RBC shall have in
all material respects fulfilled or complied with all covenants
contained in this Agreement and in every Ancillary Agreement to
be fulfilled or complied with by it at or prior to the Closing,
and RBC shall have executed and delivered a certificate of a
senior officer to that effect.
(c)
RBC Material Adverse Effect. Since the date
hereof, there shall not have been or occurred an RBC Material
Adverse Effect nor shall have any event occurred or circumstance
arisen which, individually or in the aggregate, may give rise to
an RBC Material Adverse Effect.
(d)
Delivery of Documents. RBC shall have
delivered to RBTT counterparts of each Ancillary Agreement to
which it is to be a party, duly executed by RBC, and each other
certificate or instrument required by this Agreement or any
Ancillary Agreement to be delivered by RBC on or prior to
Closing, duly executed by RBC. All such Ancillary Agreements,
certificates and instruments shall be in form and substance
reasonably satisfactory to RBTT.
Section 6.3 Conditions
for the Benefit of RBC.
The obligations of RBC to complete the transactions contemplated
by this Agreement shall also be subject to the fulfilment of
each of the following additional conditions precedent (each of
which is for the exclusive benefit of RBC and may be waived by
RBC):
(a)
Truth of Representation and Warranties —
RBTT. (i) The representations and warranties
of RBTT contained in Section 3.1(a) (Corporate Matters),
(b) (Corporate Authorization), (f) (Execution and Binding
Obligation), (g) (Authorized and Issued Capital), (h)
(Subsidiaries), and (z) (Brokers and Finders) shall be true and
correct in all material respects, and (ii) the other
representations and warranties of RBTT contained in this
Agreement (without giving effect to any materiality (including
the word “material” or “RBTT Material Adverse
Effect”) qualification) shall be true and correct, in each
case as of the Closing Date with the same effect as if made at
and as of the Closing Date (other than such representations that
are made as of a specified date, which shall be true and correct
as of such date), except in the case of clause (ii), as would
not reasonably be expected to have, individually or in the
aggregate, an RBTT Material Adverse Effect; and RBC shall have
received a certificate from RBTT addressed to RBC and dated the
Closing Date, signed on behalf of RBTT by two senior executive
officers of RBTT confirming the same as at the Closing Date.
(b)
Performance of Covenants. RBTT shall have in
all material respects fulfilled or complied with all covenants
contained in this Agreement and in any Ancillary Agreement to be
fulfilled or complied with by it at or prior to Closing and RBTT
shall have executed and delivered a certificate of a senior
officer to that effect.
(c)
RBTT Material Adverse Effect. Since the date
hereof, there shall not have been or occurred an RBTT Material
Adverse Effect nor shall have any event occurred or circumstance
arisen which, individually or in the aggregate, may give rise to
an RBTT Material Adverse Effect.
(d)
Delivery of Documents. RBTT shall have
delivered to RBC counterparts of each Ancillary Agreement to
which RBTT is to be a party, duly executed by RBTT, and each
other certificate or instrument required by this Agreement or
any Ancillary Agreement to be delivered by RBTT on or prior to
Closing, duly executed by RBTT. All such Ancillary Agreements,
certificates and instruments shall be in form and substance
reasonably satisfactory to RBC.
(e)
Dissent. RBTT Shareholders shall not have
exercised dissent or similar rights in connection with the
transactions contemplated hereby, other than RBTT Shareholders
holding no more than 5% of the outstanding RBTT Ordinary Shares.
(f)
Canadian Bank Approvals. The terms and
conditions upon which the Canadian Bank Approvals shall have
been obtained shall be satisfactory to RBC.
(g)
Satisfaction with Regulatory Approvals. All
Regulatory Approvals relating to the issuance of the RBC Common
Shares shall have been obtained on terms and conditions
satisfactory to RBC, in its sole discretion, including with
respect to any terms and conditions relating to RBC’s
continuous disclosure obligations, RBC’s financial
reporting, and any listing fees or similar costs, and, in
particular, there shall be no requirement (or if applicable Laws
or stock exchange rules provide for such a requirement, RBC
shall have been exempted therefrom) that RBC (i) issue or
qualify a prospectus, registration statement or similar document
in any jurisdiction in connection with the issuance of the RBC
Common Shares, or (ii) report or reconcile its financial
statements in accordance with IAS and IFRS.
(h)
No Stamp Duties, Etc. RBC shall be satisfied
in its sole discretion that no stamp duty or other similar Taxes
shall be payable in connection with the consummation of the
transactions contemplated hereby (other than Taxes not exceeding
$200,000 in the aggregate).
(i)
Executive Contracts. Within 45 days after
the entering into of this Agreement, RBC or an RBC Subsidiary
shall have entered into employment contracts, conditional on
Closing, with the Chief Executive Officer and at least four
other executive officers of RBTT, in each case on terms and
conditions satisfactory to RBC.
(j)
Third Party Consents. All necessary approvals
of the applicable trustees and bondholders under the following
RBTT Contracts shall have been obtained on terms and conditions
satisfactory to RBC, acting reasonably: (i) trust deed
dated April 6, 2004 between RBTT and RBTT
Trust Limited; and (ii) trust deed dated
December 31, 2004 between RBTT Bank Jamaica Limited and
RBTT Trust Limited.
Section 6.4
Notice and Cure Provisions.
(1)
RBTT and RBC will give prompt notice to the other of the
occurrence, or failure to occur, at any time from the date
hereof until the Effective Time, of any event or state of facts
which occurrence or failure would, or would be reasonably likely
to:
(a)
cause any of the representations or warranties of such Party
contained herein to be untrue or inaccurate as of the Effective
Time;
(b)
constitute or result in such Party’s failure to comply in
any material respect with any covenant or agreement to be
complied with by it hereunder prior to the Effective
Time; or
(c)
result in the failure of a condition to the other Party’s
obligations hereunder to be satisfied as of the Closing Date.
(2)
Neither RBTT, on the one hand, nor RBC, on the other hand, may
seek to rely upon any conditions precedent contained in
Section 6.1, Section 6.2 or Section 6.3, or
exercise any termination right arising therefrom (which for
greater certainty shall not include the termination rights set
out in Section 7.1(3)(c) for breaches of Section 5.6
and Section 5.7), unless forthwith and in any event prior
to the filing of the Articles of Amalgamation for acceptance by
the Registrar, RBTT or RBC, as the case may be, has delivered a
written notice to the other specifying in reasonable detail all
breaches of covenants, representations and warranties or other
matters which RBTT or RBC, as the case may be, is asserting as
the basis for the non-fulfilment of the applicable condition
precedent or the exercise of the termination right, as the case
may be. If any such notice is delivered, provided that RBTT or
RBC, as the case may be, is proceeding diligently to cure such
matter, if such matter is susceptible of being cured (for
greater certainty, other than by way of disclosure in the case
of representations and warranties), the other may not terminate
this Agreement as a result thereof until the later of the
Outside Date and the expiration of a period of 30 days from
such notice. If such notice has been delivered prior to the date
of the RBTT Meeting, such meeting shall, unless the Parties
agree otherwise, be postponed or adjourned until the expiry of
such period. If such notice has been delivered prior to the
filing of the Articles of Amalgamation with the Registrar, such
application and such filing shall be postponed until the expiry
of such period. For greater certainty, in the event that such
matter is cured within the time period referred to herein, this
Agreement may not be terminated as a result of the cured breach.
ARTICLE 7
TERMINATION
Section 7.1 Termination
Rights.
(1)
Subject to Section 6.4, this Agreement may be terminated by
RBTT if there has been a breach of or failure to perform any
representation, warranty, covenant or agreement on the part of
RBC set forth in this Agreement, which breach or failure to
perform would cause the condition contained in
Section 6.2(a) or Section 6.2(b) not to be satisfied.
Subject to Section 6.4, this Agreement may be terminated by
RBC if there has been a breach of or failure to perform any
representation, warranty, covenant or agreement on the part of
RBTT set forth in this Agreement, which breach or failure to
perform would cause the condition contained in
Section 6.3(a) or Section 6.3(b) not to be satisfied.
(3)
This Agreement may be terminated:
(a)
by the mutual agreement of the Parties (and, for the avoidance
of doubt, without the necessity of further action on the part of
the RBTT Shareholders if terminated after the holding of the
RBTT Meeting);
(b)
by either of the Parties, if there shall be passed any Law or
regulation that makes consummation of the transactions
contemplated by this Agreement illegal or otherwise prohibited
or if any injunction, order or decree enjoining the Parties from
consummating the transactions contemplated by this Agreement is
entered and such injunction, order or decree has become final
and non-appealable;
(c)
by RBC, if the Board of Directors of RBTT or any committee of
the Board of Directors of RBTT shall have (i) failed to
recommend or withdrawn or modified or changed, in a manner
adverse to RBC, its approval or recommendation of this Agreement
or the Amalgamation, or failed to publicly affirm
and/or
reaffirm (within five (5) Business Days of having been
requested to do so by RBC) its approval or recommendation of
this Agreement or the Amalgamation, or (ii) recommended an
RBTT Acquisition Proposal or an RBTT Superior Proposal, or if
RBTT shall have wilfully breached its obligations under
Section 5.6 and Section 5.7 in any material respect;
(d)
by RBC, if the Amalgamation is not submitted for the approval of
RBTT Shareholders at the RBTT Meeting by the RBTT Meeting Date;
(e)
by RBTT, in order to enter into a definitive written agreement
with respect to an RBTT Superior Proposal, subject to compliance
with Section 5.7 and the payment of any termination payment
required to be paid pursuant to Section 7.2(1);
(f)
by RBC, if RBTT enters into an agreement (other than as
permitted under Section 5.6(c) or Section 5.7) which
facilitates an RBTT Acquisition Proposal;
(g)
by RBTT, on the one hand, or RBC, on the other hand, if the
Required RBTT Vote shall not have been obtained at the RBTT
Meeting; or
(h)
by RBTT, on the one hand, or RBC, on the other hand, if any of
the Regulatory Approvals shall not have been obtained prior to
the Closing Date, provided that the Party seeking to terminate
on this basis shall have complied with Section 5.2.
(4)
If the Closing Date does not occur on or prior to the Outside
Date, then this Agreement may be terminated by RBC (unless such
failure is principally the result of a material default by RBC
of its obligations under this Agreement), on the one hand, or
RBTT (unless such failure is principally the result of a
material default by RBTT of its obligations under this
Agreement), on the other hand, giving notice of termination to
the other, at which point this Agreement shall terminate on the
date such notice is deemed to be received.
(5)
If this Agreement is terminated in accordance with the foregoing
provisions of this Section 7.1, no Party shall have any
further liability to perform its obligations hereunder except as
provided in Section 7.2 and as otherwise contemplated
hereby, and provided that, subject to Section 7.3, neither
the termination of this Agreement nor anything contained in this
Section 7.1(5) shall relieve any Party from any liability
for any breach by it of this Agreement.
Section 7.2 Termination
Payment.
(1)
If:
(a)
RBTT shall terminate this Agreement pursuant to Section
7.1(3)(e);
(b)
RBC shall terminate this Agreement pursuant to Section
7.1(3)(c), (d) or (f);
(c)
either RBTT, on the one hand, or RBC, on the other hand, shall
terminate this Agreement pursuant to Section 7.1(1),
Section 7.1(2), or Section 7.1(3)(g) and (i) a bona
fide RBTT Acquisition Proposal has been made by any Person other
than RBC prior to the RBTT Meeting and is not withdrawn by the
date of the RBTT Meeting, (ii) the Required RBTT Vote is
not obtained at the RBTT Meeting, and (iii) RBTT
(A) consummates an RBTT Acquisition Proposal or
(B) enters into an agreement with respect to an RBTT
Acquisition Proposal with such Person or any of its Affiliates,
in either case prior to the expiration of twelve
(12) months following the RBTT Meeting Date; or
(d)
either RBTT, on the one hand, or RBC, on the other hand, shall
terminate this Agreement pursuant to Section 7.1(4) in
circumstances where (i) a bona fide RBTT Acquisition
Proposal has been made by any Person other than RBC prior to the
date of such termination, and (ii) RBTT
(A) consummates an RBTT Acquisition Proposal or
(B) enters into an agreement with respect to an RBTT
Acquisition Proposal with such Person or any of its Affiliates,
in either case prior to the expiration of twelve
(12) months following such termination of this Agreement;
then, in any such case, RBTT shall pay to RBC or as RBC may
otherwise direct in writing, the U.S. Dollar Equivalent of
TT$343,793,683 in immediately available U.S. funds to an
account designated by RBC. Such payment shall be due (A) in
the case of a termination specified in clause (a), at or prior
to the termination of this Agreement, (B) in the case of a
termination specified in clause (b), within two
(2) Business Days after written notice of termination by
RBC or (C) in the case of a termination specified in
clause (c) or (d), within two (2) Business Days
following the earlier to occur of the consummation of such
transaction or the entering into of such agreement, as
applicable. RBTT shall not be obligated to make more than one
payment pursuant to this Section 7.2(1).
(2)
For purposes of Section 7.2(1)(c) and
Section 7.2(1)(d) the references in the definition of RBTT
Acquisition Proposal to “20%” shall be deemed to be
references to “50%”.
Section 7.3 Effect
of Payments.
For greater certainty, the Parties agree that if RBTT pays to
RBC amounts required by Section 7.2 as a result of the
occurrence of any of the events referenced in Section 7.2,
no other amounts will be due and payable as damages by RBTT and
the Parties accept that such payment is the maximum amount that
RBTT shall be required to pay in lieu of any damages which RBC
may be entitled to, provided, however, that this limitation
shall not apply in the event of fraud or a wilful breach of this
Agreement by RBTT. The Parties agree that such payment
constitutes liquidated damages which are a genuine anticipated
estimate or assessment of damages that RBC will suffer or incur
as a result of the event giving rise to such damages and
resulting in the termination of this Agreement and does not and
will not constitute payment of a penalty.
Section 7.4 Remedies.
Subject to Section 7.3, the Parties acknowledge and agree
that an award of money damages may be inadequate for any breach
of this Agreement by any Party or its representatives and any
such breach may cause the non-breaching Party irreparable harm.
Accordingly, the Parties agree that, in the event of any breach
or threatened breach of this Agreement by one of the Parties,
the non-breaching Party will also be entitled, without the
requirement of posting a bond or other security, to seek
equitable relief, including injunctive relief and specific
performance. Such remedies will not be the exclusive remedies
for any breach of this Agreement but will be in addition to all
other remedies available at law or equity to each of Parties.
The Parties agree that the agreements contained in
Section 7.2 are an integral part of the transactions
contemplated by this Agreement.
ARTICLE 8
MISCELLANEOUS
Section 8.1 Notices.
Any notice, direction or other communication (each a
“Notice”) given regarding the matters
contemplated by this Agreement or any Ancillary Agreement must
be in writing, sent by personal delivery, courier or facsimile
(but not by electronic mail) and addressed:
(a)
to RBTT at:
RBTT Financial Holdings Limited
P.O. Box 287, Royal Court
19-21 Park
Street
Port of Spain, Trinidad, W.I.
Stikeman Elliott LLP
5300 Commerce Court West
199 Bay Street
Toronto, Ontario M5L 1B9
Attention: Richard Clark
Telephone: 416-869-5546
Facsimile: 416-947-0866
(b)
to RBC at:
Royal Bank of Canada
200 Bay Street,
8th Floor,
North Tower
Royal Bank Plaza
Toronto, Ontario M5J 2J5
Attention: General Counsel
Facsimile: (416) 974-3861
with a copy to:
Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt LLP
100 King Street West
1 First Canadian Place
Suite 6100, P.O. Box 50
Toronto, Ontario M5X 1B8
Attention: Steve Sigurdson
Telephone: (416) 862-4261
Facsimile: (416) 862-6666
A Notice is deemed to be delivered and received (i) if sent
by personal delivery, on the date of delivery if it is a
Business Day and the delivery was made prior to 4:00 p.m.
(local time in place of receipt) and otherwise on the next
Business Day, (ii) if sent by
same-day
service courier, on the date of delivery if sent on a Business
Day and delivery was made prior to 4:00 p.m. (local time in
place of receipt) and otherwise on the next Business Day,
(iii) if sent by overnight courier, on the next Business
Day, or (iv) if sent by facsimile, on the Business Day
following the date of confirmation of transmission by the
originating facsimile. A Party may change its address for
service from time to time by providing a Notice in accordance
with the foregoing. Any subsequent Notice must be sent to the
Party at its changed address. Any element of a Party’s
address that is not specifically changed in a Notice will be
assumed not to be changed. Sending a copy of a Notice to a
Party’s legal counsel as contemplated above is for
information purposes only and does not constitute delivery of
the Notice to that Party. The failure to send a copy of a Notice
to legal counsel does not invalidate delivery of that Notice to
a Party.
Section 8.2 Time
of the Essence.
Time is of the essence in this Agreement.
Section 8.3 Third
Party Beneficiaries.
Except as provided in Section 5.12, and except for
(i) the rights of the RBTT Securityholders to receive the
consideration for their RBTT Ordinary Shares following the
Effective Time and (ii) the right of RBTT, on behalf of the
RBTT Securityholders, to pursue damages (subject to
Section 7.4) following a termination of this Agreement for
RBC’s breach of any representation and warranty, covenant
or agreement set forth in this Agreement or fraud, which rights
are hereby acknowledged and agreed by RBC, this Agreement is not
intended to confer any rights or remedies upon any person other
than the Parties to this Agreement.
The representations and warranties in this Agreement and in any
certificate delivered pursuant to this Agreement shall terminate
at the Effective Time. Except as otherwise expressly provided in
this Agreement, the covenants set out in Section 5.12 shall
not merge on and shall survive the Closing.
Section 8.5 Amendments.
This Agreement may only be amended, supplemented or otherwise
modified by written agreement signed by each of the Parties.
Section 8.6 Waiver.
No waiver of any of the provisions of this Agreement or any
Ancillary Agreement will constitute a waiver of any other
provision (whether or not similar). No waiver will be binding
unless executed in writing by the Party to be bound by the
waiver. A Party’s failure or delay in exercising any right
under this Agreement will not operate as a waiver of that right.
A single or partial exercise of any right will not preclude a
Party from any other or further exercise of that right or the
exercise of any other right.
Section 8.7 Entire
Agreement.
This Agreement, the Confidentiality Agreement and the Ancillary
Agreements constitute the entire agreement between the Parties
with respect to the transactions contemplated by this Agreement
and supersede all prior agreements, understandings, negotiations
and discussions, whether oral or written, of the Parties. There
are no representations, warranties, covenants, conditions or
other agreements, express or implied, collateral, statutory or
otherwise, including implied warranties or conditions of
merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose, between the
Parties in connection with the subject matter of this Agreement,
except as specifically set forth in this Agreement or any
Ancillary Agreement. The Parties have not relied and are not
relying on any other information, discussion or understanding in
entering into and completing the transactions contemplated by
this Agreement and the Ancillary Agreements. If there is any
conflict or inconsistency between the provisions of this
Agreement and the provisions of any Ancillary Agreement, the
provisions of this Agreement shall govern.
Section 8.8 Successors
and Assigns.
(1)
This Agreement becomes effective only when executed and
delivered by RBC and RBTT. After that time, it will be binding
upon and enure to the benefit of RBC and RBTT, their respective
successors and permitted assigns.
(2)
Neither this Agreement nor any of the rights or obligations
under this Agreement shall be assignable or transferable by any
Party without the prior written consent of the other Party. Any
assignment in violation of this Section 8.8 shall be null
and void ab initio.
Section 8.9 Severability.
If any provision of this Agreement is determined to be illegal,
invalid or unenforceable by any court of competent jurisdiction,
that provision will be severed from this Agreement and the
remaining provisions shall remain in full force and effect.
Section 8.10 Governing
Law.
(1)
This Agreement will be governed by and interpreted and enforced
in accordance with the laws of the province of Ontario and the
federal laws of Canada applicable therein, except to the extent
that the laws of Trinidad and Tobago apply by operation of law
to the Amalgamation and the Redemption.
(2)
Each Party irrevocably attorns and submits to the non-exclusive
jurisdiction of the Ontario courts situated in the City of
Toronto and waives objection to the venue of any proceeding in
such court or that such court provides an inconvenient forum.
(3)
The Parties agree that irreparable damage would occur in the
event that any of the provisions of this Agreement were not
performed in accordance with their specific terms or were
otherwise breached. It is accordingly agreed that each of the
Parties shall be entitled to seek an injunction or injunctions
to prevent breaches of this Agreement and to enforce
specifically the terms and provisions of this Agreement in the
Ontario Courts situated in the City of Toronto, this being in
addition to any other remedy to which such Party is entitled at
law or in equity.
(4)
RBTT appoints Stikeman Elliott LLP as agent for the service of
any process with respect to any matter arising under or related
to this Agreement.
Section 8.11 Waiver
of Jury Trial.
Each Party acknowledges and agrees that any controversy that may
arise under this Agreement is likely to involve complicated and
difficult issues, and therefore each such Party hereby
irrevocably and unconditionally waives any right such Party may
have to a trial by jury in respect of any litigation directly or
indirectly arising out of or relating to this Agreement, or the
transactions contemplated by this Agreement. Each Party
certifies and acknowledges that (i) no representative,
agent or attorney of any other Party has represented, expressly
or otherwise, that such other Party would not, in the event of
litigation, seek to enforce the foregoing waiver, (ii) each
Party understands and has considered the implications of this
waiver, (iii) each Party makes this waiver voluntarily, and
(iv) each Party has been induced to enter into this
Agreement by, among other things, the mutual waivers and
certifications in this Section 8.11.
Section 8.12
Rules of Construction.
The Parties to this Agreement have been represented by counsel
during the negotiation and execution of this Agreement and waive
the application of any Laws or rule of construction providing
that ambiguities in any agreement or other document shall be
construed against the Party drafting such agreement or other
document.
Section 8.13 Counterparts.
This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts
(including counterparts by facsimile) and all such counterparts
taken together shall be deemed to constitute one and the same
instrument.
Approval by the Superintendent of Financial Institutions
(Canada) under the Bank Act (Canada), including approval of
(1) the acquisition by RBC of a substantial investment in,
and control of, RBTT and each RBTT Subsidiary that carries on a
financial services activity, and (2) the issuance of the
RBC Common Shares.
The amalgamation of RBTT Financial Holdings Limited
(“RBTT”) and RBC Holdings (Trinidad &
Tobago) Limited (“RBC Holdings (Trinidad &
Tobago)”), as more particularly described and set out in
the Directors’ Circular (“Circular”) of RBTT
dated l
accompanying the notice of this meeting, is hereby authorized
and approved;
2.
The form of Amalgamation Agreement (“Amalgamation
Agreement”) between RBTT, Royal Bank of Canada
(“RBC”) and RBC Holdings (Trinidad & Tobago)
attached as
Appendix l
to the Circular, and the transactions contemplated thereby, as
the board of directors of RBTT (“Directors”) may from
time to time approve, is hereby authorized and approved;
3.
Notwithstanding that this resolution has been passed, the
Directors are hereby authorized and empowered to amend the
Amalgamation Agreement to the extent permitted by the
Combination Agreement made October 1, 2007 between RBTT and
RBC, as amended and restated as of January 22, 2008, as
further amended, modified or supplemented from time to time in
accordance with its terms; and
4.
Any two Directors or two executive officers (“Executive
Officers”) of RBTT are hereby authorized and directed, for
and on behalf of RBTT, to execute and deliver all documents,
agreements, instruments or notices, with or without corporate
seal affixed, and to perform all other acts that such Directors
or Executive Officers may deem necessary or advisable to give
effect to this resolution, including, without limitation, the
execution and delivery of the Articles of Amalgamation in
prescribed form to the Registrar under the Companies Act
(Chap. 81:01 of the Laws of the Republic of Trinidad and
Tobago), as amended, such determination to be conclusively
evidenced by the execution and delivery of any such document,
agreement, instrument, or notice and the performance of any such
act.
Approvals of, and filings with, the RBC Exchanges.
3.
Approvals and filings by RBC under applicable securities Laws,
including in connection with the issuance of the RBC Common
Shares.
4.
Approvals and licences under the Foreign Investment Act
(Trinidad and Tobago).
5.
Approvals of the Central Bank and Minister of Finance under the
Financial Institutions Act (Trinidad and Tobago).
6.
Approval of the Minister of Finance under the Banking Act
(Jamaica).
7.
Approval of the Minister of Finance under the Financial
Institutions (Amendment) Act 2006 (Barbados).
8.
Approval, if any, of the Fair Trading Commission under the
Fair Competition Act (Barbados).
9.
Approval of the Central Bank of the Netherlands Antilles under
the National Ordinance on the Supervision of Banking and Credit
Institutions 1994 (Netherlands Antilles).
10.
Approval of the Central Bank of Aruba under the State Ordinance
on the Supervision of the Credit System of Aruba.
11.
Approval of the Eastern Caribbean Central Bank under Banking
Act No. 19 of 2005 (Grenada).
12.
Approval of the Minister of Finance acting on the recommendation
of the Eastern Caribbean Central Bank under the Banking Act,
2005 (Antigua).
13.
Approval of the Eastern Caribbean Central Bank under the
Banking Act, 2005 (Nevis).
14.
Approvals of, if any, and filings with the RBTT Exchanges.
15.
Approvals of, if any, and filings with the applicable securities
regulators in each of Trinidad and Tobago, Barbados and Jamaica.
Amalgamation Agreement
dated l ,
2008 among RBTT Financial Holdings Limited
(“RBTT”), Royal Bank of Canada
(“RBC”) and RBC Holdings (Trinidad &
Tobago) Limited (“RBC Holdings”).
RECITALS:
(a)
RBTT was incorporated under the Act by a certificate and
articles of incorporation dated July 14, 1998.
(b)
RBC Holdings was incorporated under the Act by a certificate and
articles of incorporation dated November 28, 2007.
(c)
RBTT is authorized to issue an unlimited number of ordinary
shares and an unlimited number of preferred
shares. l
ordinary shares and no preferred shares of RBTT are issued and
outstanding as of the date of this Agreement.
(d)
RBC Holdings, an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of RBC, is
authorized to issue an unlimited number of ordinary shares and
redeemable preference
shares. l
ordinary shares of RBC Holdings are issued and outstanding as of
the date of this Agreement.
(e)
RBTT and RBC have entered into the Combination Agreement.
(f)
Pursuant to the Combination Agreement, RBTT and RBC Holdings are
to amalgamate under the Act and continue as one corporation (the
“Corporation”) on the terms contained in this
Agreement.
(g)
The Amalgamation Agreement will be filed with the Trinidad and
Tobago corporate authorities, who will issue a Certificate of
Amalgamation.
(h)
At the Effective Time, the ordinary shares of RBC Holdings will
be converted into ordinary shares of the Corporation, and the
RBTT Ordinary Shares will be cancelled by the Corporation as a
“put-through” on the floor of the TTSE in exchange for
the aggregate Cash Amount and Redeemable Preferred Shares of the
Corporation.
In consideration of the foregoing and the mutual agreements
contained in this Agreement (the receipt and adequacy of which
are acknowledged), the parties agree as follows:
Section 1 Definitions.
(1)
In this Agreement:
“Act” means the Companies Act (Chp.
81:01 of the Laws of the Republic of Trinidad and Tobago), as
amended.
“Aggregate Cash Consideration” means the
product of (a) the Cash Amount, and (b) the excess of
(i) the total number of outstanding RBTT Ordinary Shares at
the Effective Time, over (ii) the total number of
outstanding RBTT Ordinary Shares held by Dissenting Shareholders
at the Effective Time, if any.
“Agreement” means this amalgamation agreement,
as amended, altered or modified from time to time pursuant to
the provisions hereof.
“Amalgamating Corporations” means RBTT and RBC
Holdings.
“Amalgamation” means the amalgamation of the
Amalgamating Corporations under the Act as contemplated by this
Agreement.
“Business Day” means any day of the year, other
than Saturday, Sunday or any day on which major banks are closed
for business in Toronto, Ontario; Bridgetown, Barbados; or
Port-of-Spain,
Trinidad and Tobago.
“Cash Amount” means TT$24.00 (or, where an RBTT
Shareholder duly so elects in accordance with the Combination
Agreement, the U.S. Dollar Equivalent of TT$24.00).
“Certificate of Amalgamation” means the
certificate issued by the Registrar giving effect to the
Amalgamation.
“Collar Exchange Ratio” means, subject to
adjustment, if any provided in Section 13, the quotient
determined by dividing (i) the Unadjusted Share Amount by
(ii) the RBC Closing Average Share Price (such quotient to
be rounded to the nearest one-hundred thousandth (0.00001)),
provided that:
(a)
if the RBC Closing Average Share Price is equal to or less than
90% of the Collar Price, the Collar Exchange Ratio means the
quotient determined by dividing (i) the Unadjusted Share
Amount by (ii) 90% of the Collar Price (such quotient to be
rounded to the nearest one-hundred thousandth (0.00001)); and
(b)
if the RBC Closing Average Share Price is equal to or greater
than 110% of the Collar Price, the Collar Exchange Ratio means
the quotient determined by dividing (i) the Unadjusted
Share Amount by (ii) 110% of the Collar Price (such
quotient to be rounded to the nearest one-hundred thousandth
(0.00001)).
“Collar Price” means US$54.422, being the
volume-weighted average trading price in U.S. dollars of the RBC
Common Shares on the New York Stock Exchange as reported by
Bloomberg LP for the five (5) consecutive trading days
ending on the last Business Day preceding the date of the
Combination Agreement, rounded to the nearest one-tenth of one
cent ($0.001).
“Combination Agreement” means the combination
agreement made October 1, 2007 between RBTT and RBC, as
amended and restated as of January 22, 2008, as further
amended, modified or supplemented from time to time in
accordance with its terms.
“Corporation” means the corporation continuing
as a result of the Amalgamation.
“Dissent Rights” means the right of the
registered holders of RBTT Ordinary Shares to dissent in respect
of the Amalgamation pursuant to the procedures set forth in
Section 14.
“Dissenting Shareholder” means a holder of RBTT
Ordinary Shares who dissents in respect of the Amalgamation in
strict compliance with the Dissent Rights.
“Effective Date” means the date on which the
Amalgamation becomes effective (being the date that the
Registrar under the Act issues a Certificate and Articles of
Amalgamation in respect of the Amalgamation).
“Effective Time” means the actual time on the
Effective Date that the Amalgamation becomes effective.
“Escrow Agent”
means l
or such other financial institution located in (or with a branch
office located in) Trinidad and Tobago as may be appointed by
RBC Holdings in accordance with the Combination Agreement.
“Ordinary Shares” means the ordinary shares in
the capital of the Corporation having the rights, privileges,
restrictions and conditions as set out in Schedule “A”.
“RBC Closing Average Share Price” means the
volume-weighted average trading price in U.S. dollars of the RBC
Common Shares on the New York Stock Exchange as reported by
Bloomberg LP for the five (5) consecutive trading days
ending on the second Business Day immediately preceding the
Effective Date, rounded to the nearest one-tenth of one cent
($0.001).
“RBC Common Shares” means the common shares in
the capital of RBC.
“RBC Subscription Proceeds” has the meaning set
out in Section 12.
“RBTT Ordinary Shares” means the ordinary
shares in the capital of RBTT.
“RBTT Shareholders” means the holders of RBTT
Ordinary Shares.
“Redeemable Preferred Shares” means the
redeemable preferred shares in the capital of the Corporation
having the rights, privileges, restrictions and conditions as
set out in Schedule “A”.
“Redemption” has the meaning set out in
Section 10(1).
“Redemption Amount” has the meaning set
out in Schedule “A”.
“Redemption Time” means the effective time
of the Redemption, which shall occur on the Effective Date
immediately following the Effective Time.
“Registrar” means the Registrar of Companies,
as defined in the Act.
“TTSE” means the Trinidad and Tobago Stock
Exchange.
“Unadjusted Share Amount” means the U.S. Dollar
Equivalent of TT$16.00 calculated on the second Business Day
immediately preceding the Effective Date.
“U.S. Dollar Equivalent” means, with respect to
an amount expressed in TT$, such TT$ amount divided by the
simple average of (i) the volume-weighted average buying
rate, and (ii) the volume-weighted average selling rate, in
each case for conversion of U.S. dollars into Trinidad and
Tobago dollars as publicly reported by the Central Bank of
Trinidad and Tobago for the five (5) consecutive trading
days ending on the second Business Day immediately preceding the
Effective Date and then rounded to the nearest one tenth of one
cent ($0.001).
(2)
Unless the context otherwise requires, all terms used in this
Agreement, (i) which are defined in the Act shall have the
respective meanings given to them in the Act, and (ii) with
initial capitals and not otherwise defined herein shall have the
respective meanings given to them in the Combination Agreement.
(3)
All references in this Agreement to dollars or to $ are
expressed in currency of the United States of America unless
otherwise specifically indicated.
Section 2 Amalgamation.
The Amalgamating Corporations agree to amalgamate at the
Effective Time under the provisions of the Act and to continue
as one corporation on the terms contained in this Agreement.
Section 3 Name
Of Corporation.
The name of the Corporation shall
be l .
Section 4 Registered
Office.
The place and address of the registered office of the
Corporation shall
be l ,
Port-of-Spain,
Trinidad and Tobago.
Section 5 Business
And Powers.
There shall be no restrictions on the business that the
Corporation may carry on or on the powers that the Corporation
may exercise, other than any restrictions required by the
Central Bank of Trinidad and Tobago.
Section 6 Authorized
Share Capital.
The classes and any maximum number of shares that the
Corporation shall be authorized to issue are as follows:
(1)
an unlimited number of Ordinary Shares; and
(2)
an unlimited number of Redeemable Preferred Shares,
in each case, having the rights, privileges, conditions and
restrictions set out in Schedule “A”.
Section 7 Number
Of Directors And First Directors.
(1)
The number of directors of the Corporation shall be a minimum
of l
and a maximum
of l ,
until changed in accordance with the Act. Until changed by
special resolution of the Corporation, or by the directors of
the Corporation if authorized by special resolution of the
Corporation, the number of directors of the Corporation shall
be l .
The first directors of the Corporation shall be the following:
Name
Address
l
l
(2)
The first directors named above shall hold office until the
later of the close of the first annual meeting of shareholders
of the Corporation and the date on which their successors are
elected or appointed.
Section 8 By-laws.
The by-laws of the Corporation shall be the by-laws of RBC
Holdings, such by-laws after the Effective Time to be
supplemented, amended or repealed in accordance with the
provisions of the Act relating to making, amending and repealing
of by-laws. Prior to the Effective Time, a copy of such by-laws
may be examined at the registered address of RBC Holdings at any
time during regular business hours.
Section 9 Amalgamation
Mechanics.
Pursuant to the Amalgamation and at the Effective Time, the
following shall occur:
(a)
Each issued and outstanding RBTT Ordinary Share that is not held
by a Dissenting Shareholder will be cancelled by the Corporation
as a “put through” on the floor of the TTSE in
exchange for:
cash in an amount equal to the Cash Amount in TT$, or U.S.$ if
duly so elected by the holder of such RBTT Ordinary Share in
accordance with Section 2.6 of the Combination Agreement;
and
(ii)
subject to Section 12(3), a number (or fractional number)
of Redeemable Preferred Shares equal to the Collar Exchange
Ratio;
(b)
Each issued and outstanding ordinary share of RBC Holdings will
be converted into Ordinary Shares of the Corporation pursuant to
the provisions of Section 221(c) of the Act and the sole
shareholder of RBC Holdings, upon surrendering its share
certificates to the Corporation for cancellation, will receive
one fully paid up Ordinary Share of the Corporation for every
one ordinary share held by such shareholder in the capital of
RBC Holdings prior to the Amalgamation; and
(c)
Each issued and outstanding RBTT Ordinary Share that is held by
a Dissenting Shareholder shall be cancelled by the Corporation
as a “put-through” on the floor of the TTSE and each
such Dissenting Shareholder will be entitled to be paid the fair
value of its RBTT Ordinary Shares in accordance with the Act.
Section 10 Redemption Of
Redeemable Preferred Shares
(1)
Immediately following the completion of the Amalgamation, the
Corporation shall, automatically and without any further act or
formality, redeem (the “Redemption”) the
Redeemable Preferred Shares at the Redemption Time for the
Redemption Amount in accordance with the rights,
privileges, conditions and restrictions attached to the
Redeemable Preferred Shares as set out in Schedule “A”
hereto. The Corporation shall deliver the aggregate
Redemption Amount to the Escrow Agent and the Escrow Agent
shall use the aggregate Redemption Amount to subscribe for,
and deliver to the holders of the Redeemable Preferred Shares,
such number of RBC Common Shares as is equal to the number of
Redeemable Preferred Shares that are the subject of the
Redemption, as contemplated in Section 12.
(2)
With respect to any RBC Common Shares delivered to the holders
of the Redeemable Preferred Shares upon Redemption, such holders
shall for all purposes, including for determining holders of RBC
Common Shares entitled to receive dividends, be deemed the
record holders thereof from and after the Effective Date.
(3)
No dividends or other distributions paid, declared or made with
respect to RBC Common Shares, with a record date after the
Effective Date, shall be paid to the holder of any unsurrendered
certificate which immediately prior to the Effective Time
represented outstanding RBTT Ordinary Shares that were exchanged
for Redeemable Preferred Shares pursuant to Section 9 and
redeemed for RBC Common Shares pursuant to this Section 10
unless the holder of such certificate shall have complied with
the provisions of Section 12(4). Subject to applicable law,
at the time such holder shall have complied with the provisions
of Section 12(4) (or, in the case of clause
(ii) below, at the appropriate payment date), there shall
be paid to the holder of the certificates formerly representing
RBTT Ordinary Shares, without interest, (i) the amount of
dividends or other distributions with a record date after the
Effective Date theretofore paid with respect to the RBC Common
Shares to which such holder is entitled pursuant to
Section 10(2) and (ii) on the appropriate payment
date, the amount of dividends or other distributions with
(A) a record date after the Effective Date but prior to the
date of compliance by such holder with the provisions of
Section 12(4), and (B) a payment date subsequent to
the date of such compliance and payable with respect to such RBC
Common Shares.
(4)
In the event that RBC reasonably determines that any issuance or
transfer to any Person of Redeemable Preferred Shares, or RBC
Common Shares upon Redemption, shall be in contravention of any
applicable law or other legal or regulatory requirement,
including any securities law, rule or regulation or any rule or
regulation of any applicable securities exchange, then, in lieu
of any issuance or transfer of Redeemable Preferred Shares or
RBC Common Shares, as applicable, to such Person, the
Corporation shall pay such Person a cash amount per Preferred
Share or RBC Common Shares, as applicable, equal to the RBC
Closing Average Share Price.
Section 11 Certificates
(1)
The Corporation shall cause the share register maintained for
the Redeemable Preferred Shares to be updated to reflect the
issuance of the Redeemable Preferred Shares at the Effective
Time pursuant to the Amalgamation to the former holders of RBTT
Ordinary Shares in accordance with Section 9 and
Section 12(3). No certificates representing the Redeemable
Preferred Shares shall be issued.
the certificates representing the RBTT Ordinary Shares shall
cease to represent RBTT Ordinary Shares and the holders thereof
shall not be entitled to exercise any of the rights of holders
of RBTT Ordinary Shares in respect thereof, and
(b)
such share certificates shall represent the right of the holder
thereof to receive the cash and RBC Common Shares to which such
holder is entitled pursuant to the provisions hereof upon
completion of the Amalgamation and Redemption as contemplated by
Section 12(4).
Section 12 Payment
(1)
At or before the Effective Time, the Corporation shall have
deposited, or shall have caused to be deposited, with the Escrow
Agent in trust for the former RBTT Shareholders:
(a)
the Aggregate Cash Consideration in TT$ or U.S.$, as applicable,
in accordance with the duly completed elections made by the
former RBTT Shareholders in accordance with Section 2.6 of
the Combination Agreement; and
(b)
a cash amount in U.S. dollars (the “RBC Subscription
Proceeds”) that is equal to the product of (i) the
number of Redeemable Preferred Shares issued or to be issued
pursuant to the Amalgamation, and (ii) the RBC Closing
Average Share Price.
(2)
The Escrow Agent shall use the RBC Subscription Proceeds only to
subscribe, on behalf of the holders of the Redeemable Preferred
Shares, for the RBC Common Shares that are issuable upon
Redemption.
(3)
No fractional Redeemable Preferred Shares shall be issued and no
dividend, stock split or other change in the capital structure
of the Corporation shall relate to any such fractional security
and such fractional interests shall not entitle the owner
thereof to exercise any rights as a security holder of the
Corporation. Each holder otherwise entitled to a fractional
interest in a Preferred Share will be entitled to receive
(a) a number of Redeemable Preferred Shares determined by
multiplying the number of RBTT Ordinary Shares held by such
holder by the Collar Exchange Ratio (such product to be rounded
down to the nearest whole number) and (b) in lieu of any
remaining fractional Redeemable Preferred Shares, a cash payment
from the Escrow Agent equal to the product of such fractional
interest and the RBC Closing Average Share Price, such amount to
be provided to the Escrow Agent by the Corporation upon request.
If more than one certificate formerly representing RBTT Ordinary
Shares are surrendered for the account of the same holder, the
number of Redeemable Preferred Shares for which such
certificates have been surrendered shall be computed on the
basis of the aggregate number of RBTT Ordinary Shares
represented by the certificates so surrendered.
(4)
Upon the surrender to the Escrow Agent, for cancellation on
behalf of the Corporation, of the certificate or certificates
which prior to the Effective Time represented RBTT Ordinary
Shares, together with such other documents and such additional
documents and instruments as the Escrow Agent may reasonably
require from a former RBTT Shareholder, or any documents that
the Escrow Agent may reasonably require in the case of any RBTT
Ordinary Shares held in a depositary, the Escrow Agent shall
deliver to such former RBTT Shareholder (or in the case of any
RBTT Ordinary Shares held in a depositary to deliver to such
depositary, or cause to be delivered pursuant to existing
arrangements, as may be applicable, between such former RBTT
Shareholder and the depositary, or such other arrangements as
agreed to by RBTT and RBC, each acting reasonably):
(a)
the amount of cash to which such holder is entitled to receive
pursuant to Section 9 and Section 12(3); and
(b)
certificates representing the RBC Common Shares to which such
holder is entitled to receive upon the Redemption of the
Redeemable Preferred Shares issued to such holder pursuant to
Section 9 and Section 12(3).
(5)
The determination by the Escrow Agent of all calculations
required to be made hereunder, following discussions with RBTT
and RBC, shall be final and binding on all Parties, absent
manifest error.
(6)
In the event any certificate which immediately prior to the
Effective Time represented one or more outstanding RBTT Ordinary
Shares that were cancelled pursuant to Section 9 shall have
been lost, stolen or destroyed, upon the making of an affidavit
of that fact by the holder of RBTT Ordinary Shares claiming such
certificate to be lost, stolen or destroyed, the Escrow Agent
will issue in exchange for the RBTT Ordinary Shares represented
by such lost, stolen or destroyed certificate, any consideration
pursuant to Section 12(4) for the
cancellation of such RBTT Ordinary Shares (and any dividends or
distributions with respect thereto) in each case deliverable in
accordance with Section 12(4). When authorizing such
payment in exchange for any lost, stolen or destroyed
certificate, the holder to whom cash and/or certificates
representing RBC Common Shares are to be issued shall, as a
condition precedent to the issuance thereof, indemnify RBTT and
RBC in a manner satisfactory to RBTT and RBC against any claim
that may be made against RBTT and RBC with respect to the
certificate alleged to have been lost, stolen or destroyed.
(7)
Any RBC Common Shares, together with any funds held by the
Escrow Agent, that remain undistributed to former holders of
RBTT Ordinary Shares twelve months after the Effective Time
shall be delivered to the Corporation or its designee, upon
demand therefor, and holders of certificates previously
representing RBTT Ordinary Shares who have not theretofore
complied with Section 12(4) shall thereafter look only to
the Corporation or its designee for payment of any claim to
cash, RBC Common Shares, cash in lieu of fractional shares
thereof or dividends or distributions, if any, in respect
thereof.
Section 13 Adjustments
The Collar Exchange Ratio shall be appropriately adjusted to
reflect fully the effect of any stock split, reverse split,
stock dividend (including any dividend or distribution of
securities convertible into RBC Common Shares), reorganization,
recapitalization or other like change with respect to RBC Common
Shares occurring after the date of the Combination Agreement and
prior to the Effective Time, but not to reflect any other
dividends or distributions.
Section 14 Dissent
Rights
If required under the Act, but only to the extent required
thereby, any RBTT Ordinary Shares that are held by RBTT
Shareholders (each, a “Dissenting Shareholder”)
who (i) have not voted in favour of the Amalgamation,
(ii) are entitled to make a claim under Section 227(5)
of the Act, (iii) have delivered such written notices to
RBTT under Section 227(6) of the Act and have not withdrawn
such notices, (iv) have taken such other action required by
Section 228 of the Act, within the time and in the manner
specified therein, and (v) shall not otherwise have lost
their rights to make a claim under Sections 228 and 229 of
the Act, shall not be cancelled and exchanged into the right to
receive cash and Redeemable Preferred Shares (which are
redeemable into RBC Common Shares) contemplated by this
Agreement. Such Dissenting Shareholder shall, subject to the
Act, cease to have any rights as an RBTT Shareholder other than
the right to receive the fair value of such RBTT Ordinary Shares
as shall be determined in accordance with Sections 227
through 236 of the Act; provided, however, in the
event that any Dissenting Shareholder shall have failed to
fulfill all of the conditions set out at (i) to
(v) herein, the RBTT Ordinary Shares of the Dissenting
Shareholder shall be deemed to be cancelled and exchanged, at
the Effective Time, into the right to receive the cash and
Redeemable Preferred Shares and each such Preferred Share shall
be deemed to have been redeemed as of the Redemption Time
in accordance with and subject to the provisions of
Section 9 and Section 10, respectively, without any
interest thereon. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary
contained in this Section 14, if (x) this Agreement is
terminated or (y) the RBTT Shareholders revoke RBTT’s
authority to effect the Amalgamation, then the right of any
Dissenting Shareholder to be paid the fair value of such
Dissenting Shareholder’s RBTT Ordinary Shares pursuant to
the Act shall cease as provided in Section 229 of the Act.
RBTT shall give RBC prompt notice of any demands, withdrawals,
or other notices received by RBTT for or with respect to claims
by the Dissenting Shareholders under Sections 227 to 236 of
the Act, and RBTT shall have the right to participate in and
direct all negotiations and proceedings with respect to such
demands and notices. RBTT shall not, except with the prior
written consent of RBC, make any payment with respect to, or
settle or offer to settle, any such demands or agree to do any
of the foregoing.
Section 15 Stated
Capital.
The stated capital attributable to the Ordinary Shares of the
Corporation issuable pursuant to Section 9 upon the
conversion of the ordinary shares of RBC Holdings shall be equal
to the aggregate stated capital attributable to such ordinary
shares of RBC Holdings. The stated capital attributable to the
Redeemable Preferred Shares of the Corporation issuable pursuant
to Section 9 upon the cancellation of the RBTT Ordinary
Shares shall be equal to the aggregate stated capital
attributable to such RBTT Ordinary Shares.
Section 16 Articles Of
Amalgamation.
Provided that this Agreement has not otherwise been terminated,
the articles of amalgamation giving effect to the Amalgamation
to be filed pursuant to this Agreement will be filed as provided
under the Combination Agreement and in accordance with the Act
and the regulations thereunder, together with any and all
documents required by the Act and the
regulations thereunder, and upon issuance of the Certificate of
Amalgamation such articles of amalgamation shall be the articles
of incorporation of the Corporation.
Section 17 Property
Of The Corporation
From and after the Effective Time, in respect of all matters
listed below, as such exist immediately prior to the Effective
Time:
(a)
the property of each of the Amalgamating Corporations shall
become the property of the Corporation;
(b)
the Corporation shall become liable for the obligations of each
Amalgamating Corporation;
(c)
any existing cause of action, claim or liability to prosecution
against an Amalgamating Corporation shall remain unaffected;
(d)
any civil, criminal or administrative action or proceeding
pending by or against an Amalgamating Corporation may be
continued by or against the Corporation; and
(e)
any conviction against, or ruling, order or judgment in favour
of or against, an Amalgamating Corporation may be enforced by or
against the Corporation.
Section 18 Modification
Of This Agreement
This agreement may only be amended, restated or otherwise
modified by the prior written consent of the parties hereto.
Section 19 Termination.
This Agreement may be terminated only (i) upon the mutual
written agreement of the Parties to do so, or (ii) prior to
the Effective Time, automatically upon the termination of the
Combination Agreement.
Section 20 Further
Assurances.
Each of the Amalgamating Corporations shall execute and deliver
all other documents and do all acts or things as may be
necessary or desirable to give effect to this Agreement.
Section 21 Governing
Law.
This Agreement shall be governed by and interpreted and enforced
in accordance with the laws of the Republic of Trinidad and
Tobago.
Section 22 Counterparts.
This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts
(including counterparts by facsimile) and all such counterparts
taken together shall be deemed to constitute one and the same
instrument
RIGHTS,
PRIVILEGES, RESTRICTIONS AND CONDITIONS ATTACHING TO THE
ORDINARY SHARES AND REDEEMABLE PREFERRED SHARES OF THE
CORPORATION
The rights, privileges, restrictions and conditions attaching to
the Ordinary Shares and Redeemable Preferred Shares of the
Corporation shall be as follows:
ORDINARY
SHARES
The Ordinary Shares shall have attached thereto (in addition to
the rights, privileges, restrictions and conditions contained in
the Companies Act Chap 81:01) the following rights, privileges,
restrictions and conditions:
1.
Voting
Rights
Each holder of Ordinary Shares shall be entitled to receive
notice of and to attend all meetings of shareholders of the
Corporation and to vote thereat, except meetings at which only
holders of a specified class of shares (other than Ordinary
Shares) or specified series of shares are entitled to vote. At
all meetings of which notice must be given to the holders of the
Ordinary Shares, each holder of Ordinary Shares shall be
entitled to one vote in respect of each Ordinary Share held by
such holder.
2.
Dividends
Subject to the rights of any class of shares of the Corporation
to receive dividends in priority to or rateably with the holders
of the Ordinary Shares and the requirements of the Companies
Act, the holders of the Ordinary Shares shall be entitled to
receive dividends if, as and when declared by the Board of
Directors of the Corporation and payable in such manner as the
Board of Directors may from time to time determine.
3.
Liquidation,
Dissolution or Winding-up
The holders of the Ordinary Shares shall be entitled, subject to
the rights, privileges, restrictions and conditions attaching to
any other class of shares of the Corporation, to receive the
remaining property of the Corporation on a liquidation,
dissolution or winding-up of the Corporation, whether voluntary
or involuntary, or on any other return of capital or
distribution of assets of the Corporation among its shareholders
for the purpose of winding up its affairs.
4.
Priority
The Ordinary Shares shall rank junior to the Redeemable
Preferred Shares with respect to priority in the distribution of
assets in the event of the liquidation, dissolution or
winding-up of the Corporation, whether voluntary or involuntary,
or on any other return of capital or distribution of assets of
the Corporation among its shareholders for the purpose of
winding up its affairs, and shall be subject in all respects to
the rights, privileges, restrictions and conditions attaching to
the Redeemable Preferred Shares.
REDEEMABLE
PREFERRED SHARES
The Redeemable Preferred Shares shall have attached thereto the
following rights, privileges, restrictions and conditions:
1.
Definitions
With respect to the Redeemable Preferred Shares, the following
terms shall have the meanings ascribed to them below:
“Act” means the Companies Act (Chp. 81:01 of
the Laws of the Republic of Trinidad and Tobago), as amended.
“Amalgamation” means the amalgamation pursuant
to the Act of RBTT Financial Holdings Limited and RBC Holdings
(Trinidad & Tobago) Limited.
“Effective Date” means the date on which the
Amalgamation becomes effective (being the date that the
Registrar under the Act issues a Certificate and Articles of
Amalgamation in respect of the Amalgamation).
“Effective Time” means the actual time on the
Effective Date that the Amalgamation becomes effective.
“Escrow Agent” means a financial institution
appointed by the Corporation to act as escrow agent.
“RBC” means Royal Bank of Canada, a
Schedule I Chartered Bank governed by the Bank Act
(Canada).
“RBC Closing Average Share Price” means the
volume weighted average trading price in U.S. dollars of the RBC
Common Shares on the New York Stock Exchange as reported by
Bloomberg LP for the five (5) consecutive trading days
ending on the second Business Day immediately preceding the
Effective Date, rounded to the nearest one-tenth of one cent
($0.001).
“RBC Common Shares” means the common shares in
the capital of RBC.
“Redemption Amount” means in respect of
each Redeemable Preferred Share an amount, in U.S. dollars,
equal to the RBC Closing Average Share Price.
“Redemption Price” means in respect of
each Redeemable Preferred Share an amount, in U.S. dollars,
equal to (i) the Redemption Amount, plus (ii) the
amount of all declared and unpaid dividends, without interest,
on each RBC Common Share with a record date occurring after the
Effective Date but prior to the date on which the share
certificates referred to in Section 2 are surrendered to
the Escrow Agent in accordance with the provisions hereof.
“Redemption Time” means the time on the
Effective Date immediately following the Effective Time.
2.
Redemption
The Corporation shall, subject to the requirements of the Act,
redeem automatically and without further act or formality at the
Redemption Time all but not less than all of the then
outstanding Redeemable Preferred Shares for an amount per share
equal to the Redemption Price. At or prior to the
Redemption Time the Corporation shall deliver the aggregate
Redemption Amount to the Escrow Agent. Delivery of the
aggregate Redemption Amount to the Escrow Agent in such a
manner shall be a full and complete discharge of the
Corporation’s obligation to deliver the aggregate
Redemption Price to the holders of Redeemable Preferred
Shares. Immediately following the Redemption Time the
Escrow Agent shall use the aggregate Redemption Amount so
received to subscribe for on behalf of the holders of the
Redeemable Preferred Shares such number of RBC Common Shares as
is equal to the number of Redeemable Preferred Shares that are
the subject of the redemption. No notice of redemption or other
act or formality on the part of the Corporation shall be
required to call the Redeemable Preferred Shares for redemption
at the Redemption Time.
The Escrow Agent shall be deemed to have been appointed to act
for and on behalf of the holders of the Redeemable Preferred
Shares to subscribe for the RBC Common Shares that are issuable
upon the redemption of the Redeemable Preferred Shares.
From and after the Redemption Time, the Escrow Agent shall
deliver or cause to be delivered to the holders of the
Redeemable Preferred Shares one RBC Common Share, together with,
if applicable, the amount of any dividends on the RBC Common
Shares forming part of the Redemption Price, for each
Redeemable Preferred Share that is redeemed at the
Redemption Time, upon presentation and surrender at the
principal office of the Escrow Agent in the City of
Port-of-Spain,
Trinidad and Tobago, of the certificates representing the
ordinary shares of the Corporation’s predecessor, RBTT
Financial Holdings Limited, which were cancelled by the
Corporation and exchanged for cash and Redeemable Preferred
Shares upon and pursuant to the Amalgamation, together with such
other documents and instruments as may be required under the Act
or which the Escrow Agent or the Corporation may reasonably
require. Certificates representing such RBC Common Shares, and
if applicable, a cheque representing the amount of any dividends
on the RBC Common Shares forming part of the
Redemption Price, shall be sent by the Escrow Agent to the
address of the holder recorded in the register of the
Corporation or by holding for pick-up by the holder at the
principal office of the Escrow Agent specified above. From and
after the Redemption Time, the holders of the Redeemable
Preferred Shares called for redemption shall cease to be holders
of such Redeemable Preferred Shares and shall not be entitled to
exercise any of the rights of shareholders in respect thereof,
except to receive their proportionate share of the aggregate
Redemption Price, provided that if the
Redemption Price for any Redeemable Preferred Share is not
duly paid by or on behalf of the Corporation to the Escrow Agent
in accordance with the provisions hereof, then the rights of
such holders shall remain unaffected. Under no circumstances
will interest on the Redemption Price be paid by the
Corporation whether as a result of any delay in paying the
Redemption Price, delivering the RBC Common Shares or
otherwise.
Effective as of the Redemption Time, (i) the
Redeemable Preferred Shares in respect of which deposit of the
Redemption Amount with the Escrow Agent is made in
accordance with the provisions hereof, shall be deemed to be
redeemed and cancelled, and (ii) the rights of such holders
shall be limited to receiving the Redemption Price, payable
to them on presentation and surrender of the said certificates
held by them, as specified above. From and after the
Redemption Time, such holders shall be considered and
deemed for all purposes to be holders of the corresponding RBC
Common Shares delivered to them in accordance with this Section.
Subject to the requirements of applicable law with respect to
unclaimed property, any RBC Common Shares which are subscribed
for by the Escrow Agent in accordance with the provisions hereof
that remain undistributed twelve months after the Effective Date
shall be returned by the Escrow Agent to the Corporation or its
designee, and thereafter, the Corporation shall be responsible
for payment of the Redemption Price to former holders of
Redeemable Preferred Shares upon presentation and surrender of
such documentation as the Corporation may require and a former
holder of Redeemable Preferred Shares shall only look to the
Corporation for payment of any claim to the
Redemption Price (in each case, subject to abandoned
property, escheat or other similar laws).
Redeemable Preferred Shares, other than those redeemed as of the
Redemption Time, may be redeemed at any time and from time
to time pursuant to the terms and conditions set out in one or
more resolutions of the board of directors of the Corporation,
whether such resolution is passed before or after the issuance
of the Redeemable Preferred Shares to be redeemed.
The Corporation, the Escrow Agent and RBC shall be entitled to
deduct and withhold from the Redemption Price and from any
dividend or other consideration payable to any holder of
Redeemable Preferred Shares such amount as the Corporation, the
Escrow Agent or RBC is required to deduct and withhold under
applicable tax laws.
3.
Dividends
The holders of the Redeemable Preferred Shares shall not be
entitled to receive any dividends thereon.
4.
No Voting
Rights
Except as otherwise provided in the Act, the holders of the
Redeemable Preferred Shares shall not be entitled to receive
notice of, or to attend or to vote at, any meeting of the
shareholders of the Corporation.
5.
Liquidation,
Dissolution or Winding-up
In the event of the liquidation, dissolution or winding-up of
the Corporation, whether voluntary or involuntary, or any other
return of capital or distribution of assets of the Corporation
among its shareholders for the purpose of winding up its
affairs, subject to the extinguishment of the rights of the
holders of Redeemable Preferred Shares upon payment to the
Escrow Agent of the Redemption Price in respect of each
Redeemable Preferred Share, the holders of the Redeemable
Preferred Shares shall be entitled to receive in respect of each
such share, before any distribution of any part of the assets of
the Corporation among the holders of the Ordinary Shares and any
other shares of the Corporation ranking junior to the Redeemable
Preferred Shares, an amount equal to the Redemption Price.
After payment to the holders of the Redeemable Preferred Shares
of the amount so payable to such holders as herein provided, the
holders of the Redeemable Preferred Shares shall not be entitled
to share in any further distribution of the property or assets
of the Corporation.
6.
Priority
The Redeemable Preferred Shares shall be entitled to a
preference over the Ordinary Shares and over any other shares
ranking junior to the Redeemable Preferred Shares with respect
to priority in the distribution of assets in the event of the
liquidation, dissolution or winding-up of the Corporation,
whether voluntary or involuntary, or on any other return of
capital or distribution of assets of the Corporation among its
shareholders for the purpose of winding up its affairs.
7.
Dissent
Rights
The holders of Redeemable Preferred Shares shall not be entitled
to vote separately as a class, and shall not be entitled to
dissent, upon a proposal to amend the articles of the
Corporation to:
(a)
increase or decrease any maximum number of authorized Redeemable
Preferred Shares, or increase any maximum number of authorized
shares of a class having rights or privileges equal or superior
to the Redeemable Preferred Shares; or
(b)
effect an exchange, reclassification or cancellation of all or
part of the Redeemable Preferred Shares.
The undersigned Directors represent that the interim
consolidated financial statements presented in this Appendix
“F” to the Circular present fairly the consolidated
financial position of RBTT as at December 31, 2007 and
RBTT’s consolidated financial performance for the
nine-month period ended December 31, 2007 in accordance
with International Financial Reporting Standards.
Reports
111 Management’s responsibility for financial reporting
111 Report of Independent Registered Chartered Accountants
112 Management’s report on internal control over financial reporting
112 Report of Independent Registered Chartered Accountants
Consolidated Financial Statements
113 Consolidated Balance Sheets
114 Consolidated Statements of Income
115 Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
115 Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity
116 Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
117 Note 1 Significant accounting policies and estimates
124 Note 2 Fair value of financial instruments
127 Note 3 Securities
129 Note 4 Loans
130 Note 5 Securitizations
132 Note 6 Variable interest entities (VIEs)
133 Note 7 Derivative financial instruments and hedging activities
137 Note 8 Premises and equipment
137 Note 9 RBC Dexia Investor Services joint venture
138 Note 10 Goodwill and other intangibles
139 Note 11 Significant acquisitions and dispositions
140 Note 12 Other assets
141 Note 13 Deposits
142 Note 14 Insurance
142 Note 15 Other liabilities
143 Note 16 Subordinated debentures
144 Note 17 Trust capital securities
145 Note 18 Preferred share liabilities and share capital
147 Note 19 Non-controlling interest in subsidiaries
148 Note 20 Pensions and other post-employment benefits
150 Note 21 Stock-based compensation
153 Note 22 Trading revenue
153 Note 23 Business realignment charges
154 Note 24 Income taxes
155 Note 25 Earnings per share
156 Note 26 Concentrations of credit risk
156 Note 27 Guarantees, commitments and contingencies
159 Note 28 Contractual repricing and maturity schedule
160 Note 29 Related party transactions
161 Note 30 Results by business and geographic segment
163 Note 31 Reconciliation of the application of Canadian and United States generally accepted accounting principles
175 Note 32 Parent company information
Royal Bank of Canada: Annual Report 2007
110 Consolidated Financial Statements
MANAGEMENT’s RESPONSIBILITY FOR FINANCIAL REPORTING
The accompanying consolidated financial statements of Royal Bank of Canada (RBC) were
prepared by management, which is responsible for the integrity and fairness of the information
presented, including the many amounts that must of necessity be based on estimates and judgments.
These consolidated financial statements were prepared in accordance with Canadian generally
accepted accounting principles (GAAP) pursuant to Subsection 308 of the Bank Act (Canada), which
states that, except as otherwise specified by the Superintendent of Financial Institutions Canada,
the financial statements are to be prepared in accordance with Canadian GAAP. Financial information
appearing throughout our management’s discussion and analysis is consistent with these consolidated
financial statements.
In discharging our responsibility for the integrity and fairness of the consolidated financial
statements and for the accounting systems from which they are derived, we maintain the necessary
system of internal controls designed to ensure that transactions are authorized, assets are
safeguarded and proper records are maintained. These controls include quality standards in hiring
and training of employees, policies and procedures manuals, a corporate code of conduct and
accountability for performance within appropriate and well-defined areas of responsibility.
The system of internal controls is further supported by a compliance function, which is
designed to ensure that we and our employees comply with securities legislation and conflict of
interest rules, and by an internal audit staff, which conducts periodic audits of all aspects of
our operations.
The Board of Directors oversees management’s responsibilities for financial reporting through
an Audit Committee, which is composed entirely of directors who are neither officers nor employees
of RBC. This Committee reviews our consolidated financial statements and recommends them to the Board for
approval. Other key responsibilities of the Audit Committee include reviewing our existing internal
control procedures and planned revisions to those procedures, and advising the directors on
auditing matters and financial reporting issues. Our Compliance Officer and Chief Internal Auditor
have full and unrestricted access to the Audit Committee.
The Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions, Canada (OSFI) examines and
inquires into the business and affairs of RBC as deemed necessary to determine whether the provisions
of the Bank Act are being complied with, and that RBC is in sound financial condition. In carrying
out its mandate, OSFI strives to protect the rights and interests of depositors and creditors of
RBC.
Deloitte
& Touche LLP, Independent Registered Chartered Accountants appointed by the
shareholders of RBC upon the recommendation of the Audit Committee and Board, have performed an
independent audit of the consolidated financial statements and their report follows. The auditors
have full and unrestricted access to the Audit Committee to discuss their audit and related
findings.
Gordon M. Nixon
President and Chief Executive Officer
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS
To the Shareholders of Royal Bank of Canada
We have audited the consolidated balance sheets of Royal Bank of Canada (the “Bank”) as at
October 31, 2007 and 2006 and the consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, changes
in shareholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended October31, 2007. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Bank’s management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
With respect to the consolidated financial statements as at and for the years ended October31, 2007 and 2006, we conducted our audits in accordance with Canadian generally accepted auditing
standards and the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). With
respect to the consolidated financial statements as at and for the year ended October 31, 2005, we
conducted our audit in accordance with Canadian generally accepted auditing standards. These
standards require that we plan and perform an audit to obtain reasonable assurance whether the
financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test
basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also
includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as
well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide
a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, these consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material
respects, the financial position of the Bank as at October 31, 2007 and 2006 and the results of its
operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended October 31, 2007 in
accordance with Canadian generally accepted accounting principles.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (United States), the Bank’s internal control over financial reporting as of October31, 2007 based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated November29, 2007 expressed an unqualified opinion on the Bank’s internal control over financial reporting.
Deloitte & Touche LLP
Independent Registered Chartered Accountants
Licensed Public Accountants
Toronto, Canada November 29, 2007
Royal Bank of Canada: Annual Report 2007
Consolidated Financial Statements 111
MANAGEMENT’S REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
Management of Royal Bank of Canada (RBC) is responsible for establishing and maintaining
adequate internal control over financial reporting. Internal control over financial reporting is a
process designed by, or under the supervision of, the President and Chief Executive Officer and the
Chief Financial Officer and effected by the Board of Directors, management and other personnel to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation
of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles. It includes those policies and procedures that:
•
pertain to the maintenance of records that accurately and fairly reflect, in reasonable
detail, the transactions related to and dispositions of RBC’s assets
•
provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit
preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles, and RBC receipts and expenditures are made only in accordance with authorizations
of management and RBC’s directors
•
provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized
acquisition, use, or disposition of RBC assets that could have a material effect on RBC’s
financial statements.
Due to its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or
detect misstatements on a timely basis. Also, projections of any evaluation of the effectiveness of
internal control over financial reporting to future periods are subject to the risk that the controls
may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the
policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Management assessed the effectiveness of RBC’s internal control over financial reporting as of
October 31, 2007, based on the criteria set forth in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by
the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on this
assessment, management concluded that, as of October 31, 2007, RBC’s internal control over financial
reporting is effective. Also, management determined that there were no material weaknesses in RBC’s
internal control over financial reporting as of October 31, 2007.
RBC’s internal control over financial reporting as of October 31, 2007 has been audited by
Deloitte & Touche LLP, Independent Registered Chartered Accountants, who also audited RBC’s
Consolidated Financial Statements for the year ended October 31, 2007, as stated in the Report of
Independent Registered Chartered Accountants, which report expressed an unqualified
opinion on the effectiveness of RBC’s internal control over financial reporting.
Gordon M. Nixon
President and Chief Executive Officer
Report of Independent Registered Chartered Accountants
To the Shareholders of Royal Bank of Canada
We have audited the internal control over financial reporting of Royal Bank of Canada (the
“Bank”) as of October 31, 2007 based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated
Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. The
Bank’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial
reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting,
included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on the Bank’s internal control over financial reporting
based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to
obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was
maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal
control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and
evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk,
and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe
that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the
supervision of, the company’s principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons
performing similar functions, and effected by the company’s board of directors, management, and
other personnel to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and
the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those
policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail,
accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2)
provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in
accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide
reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or
disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of the inherent limitations of internal control over financial reporting, including the
possibility of collusion or improper management override of controls, material misstatements due to
error or fraud may not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. Also, projections of any
evaluation of the effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting to future periods
are subject to the risk that the controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions,
or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, the Bank maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over
financial reporting as of October 31, 2007 based on the criteria established in Internal
Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission.
We have also audited, in accordance with Canadian generally accepted auditing standards and
the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated
financial statements as at and for the year ended October 31, 2007 of the Bank and our report dated
November 29, 2007 expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.
Deloitte & Touche LLP
Independent Registered Chartered Accountants
Licensed Public Accountants
Toronto, Canada November 29, 2007
Royal Bank of Canada: Annual Report 2007
112 Consolidated Financial Statements
Consolidated Financial Statements (all tabular amounts are in millions of Canadian dollars, except
per share amounts)
NOTE 1 SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES
The accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements have been prepared in accordance with
Subsection 308 of the Bank Act (Canada) (the Act), which states that, except as otherwise specified
by the Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions Canada (OSFI), our Consolidated
Financial Statements are to be prepared in accordance with Canadian generally accepted accounting
principles (GAAP). The significant accounting policies used in the preparation of these financial
statements, including the accounting requirements of the OSFI, are summarized below. These
accounting policies conform, in all material respects, to Canadian GAAP.
Basis of consolidation
Our Consolidated Financial Statements include the assets and liabilities and results of operations
of all subsidiaries and variable interest entities (VIEs) where we are the Primary
Beneficiary after elimination of intercompany transactions and balances. The equity method is used
to account for investments in associated corporations and limited partnerships in which we have
significant influence. These investments are reported in Other assets. Our share of earnings, gains
and losses realized on dispositions and writedowns to reflect other-than-temporary impairment in
the value of these investments are included in Non-interest income. The proportionate consolidation
method is used to account for investments in joint ventures in which we exercise joint control,
whereby our pro rata share of assets, liabilities, income and expenses is consolidated.
Significant accounting changes
Financial Instruments
On November 1, 2006, we adopted three new financial instruments accounting standards that were
issued by the Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants (CICA): Handbook Section 1530,
Comprehensive Income (Section 1530), Handbook Section 3855, Financial Instruments — Recognition and
Measurement (Section 3855), and Handbook Section 3865, Hedges (Section 3865). Comparative amounts
for prior periods have not been restated.
Comprehensive Income
Section 1530 introduces Comprehensive Income, which consists of Net income and Other comprehensive
income (OCI). OCI represents changes in Shareholders’ equity during a period arising from
transactions and other events with non-owner sources and includes unrealized gains and losses on
financial assets classified as available-for-sale, unrealized foreign currency translation gains or
losses arising from self-sustaining foreign operations, net of hedging activities, and changes in
the fair value of the effective portion of cash flow hedging instruments. We have included in our
Consolidated Financial Statements a Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income for the changes
in these items, net of taxes, since November 1, 2006, while the cumulative changes in OCI are
included in Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) (AOCI), which is presented as a new
category of Shareholders’ equity on our Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Financial Instruments — Recognition and Measurement
Section 3855 establishes standards for
recognizing and measuring financial assets, financial liabilities and non-financial derivatives. It
requires that financial assets and financial liabilities, including derivatives, be recognized on
our Consolidated Balance Sheets when we become a party to the contractual provisions of a financial
instrument or non-financial derivative contract. Under this standard, all financial instruments are
required to be measured at fair value on initial recognition except for certain related party
transactions. Measurement in subsequent periods depends on whether the financial instrument has
been classified as held-for-trading, available-for-sale, held-to-maturity,
loans and receivables, or other financial liabilities. Transaction costs are expensed as incurred
for financial instruments classified or designated as held-for-trading. For other financial
instruments, transaction costs are capitalized on initial recognition.
Financial assets and financial liabilities held-for-trading are measured at fair value with
changes in those fair values recognized in Non-interest income. Financial assets held-to-maturity,
loans and receivables, and other financial liabilities are measured at amortized cost using the
effective interest method. Available-for-sale financial assets, which include loan substitute
securities, are measured at fair value with unrealized gains and losses, including changes in
foreign exchange rates, being recognized in OCI. Investments in equity instruments classified as
available-for-sale that do not have a quoted market price in an active market are measured at cost.
Derivative instruments are recorded on our Consolidated Balance Sheets at fair value,
including those derivatives that are embedded in financial or non-financial contracts that are not
closely related to the host contracts. Changes in the fair values of derivative instruments are
recognized in Net income except for derivatives designated as effective cash flow hedges or hedges
of foreign currency exposure of a net investment in a self-sustaining foreign operation, the
changes in fair value of which are recognized in OCI.
Section 3855 also provides an entity the option to designate a financial instrument as
held-for-trading (the fair value option) on its initial recognition or upon adoption of the
standard, even if the financial instrument was not acquired or incurred principally for the purpose
of selling or repurchasing it in the near term. An instrument that is classified as
held-for-trading by way of this fair value option must have a reliable fair value and satisfy one
of the following criteria established by the OSFI: (i) when doing so eliminates or significantly
reduces a measurement or recognition inconsistency that would otherwise arise from measuring assets
or liabilities, or recognizing gains and losses on them on a different basis; (ii) it belongs to a
group of financial assets or financial liabilities or both that are managed and evaluated on a fair
value basis in accordance with our risk management or investment strategy, and are reported to
senior management, on that basis; or (iii) it is an embedded derivative in a financial or
non-financial host contract and the derivative is not closely related to the host contract.
The principal categories of our financial assets that we designated as held-for-trading using
the fair value option include (i) investments supporting the policy benefit liabilities on life and
health insurance contracts issued by our insurance operations; (ii) investments used to offset
exposures under derivative contracts in relation to our sales and trading activities; (iii) certain
loans to customers whose related hedging derivatives are measured at fair value; and (iv) assets
purchased under reverse repurchase agreements that form part of our trading portfolio which is
managed and evaluated on a fair value basis. Financial liabilities designated as held-for-trading
include (i) deposits and structured notes with embedded derivatives that are not closely related to
the host contracts; (ii) assets sold under repurchase agreements that form part of our trading
portfolio which is managed and evaluated on a fair value basis; and (iii) certain deposits to
offset the impact of related hedging derivatives measured at fair value. Fair value designation for
these financial assets and financial liabilities significantly reduces the measurement
inconsistencies.
Other significant accounting implications arising upon the adoption of Section 3855 include
the use of the effective interest method for any transaction costs or fees, premiums or discounts
earned on financial instruments measured at amortized cost, and the recognition of the inception
fair value of the obligation undertaken in issuing a guarantee that meets the definition of a
guarantee pursuant to CICA Accounting Guideline 14, Disclosure of Guarantees (AcG-14).
Royal Bank of Canada: Annual Report 2007
Consolidated Financial Statements 117
NOTE 1 SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES (continued)
Subsequent remeasurement at fair value is not required unless the financial guarantee also
meets the definition of a derivative. These guarantees are remeasured at fair value at each balance
sheet date and reported as a derivative in Other assets or Other liabilities, as appropriate.
Hedges
Section 3865 specifies the criteria that must be satisfied in order for hedge accounting to be
applied and the accounting for each of the permitted hedging strategies. We use derivatives and
non-derivative financial instruments in our hedging strategies to manage our exposures to interest,
currency, credit and other market risks. When derivatives are used to manage our own exposures, we
determine for each derivative whether hedge accounting can be applied. Where hedge accounting can
be applied, a hedging relationship is designated as a fair value hedge, a cash flow hedge or a
hedge of foreign currency exposure of a net investment in a self-sustaining foreign operation. For
our detailed accounting policy on hedge accounting refer to the Derivatives section below in Note
1.
Impact upon adoption of Sections 1530, 3855 and 3865
The transition adjustments attributable to the
remeasurement of financial assets and financial liabilities at fair value, other than financial
assets classified as available-for-sale and hedging instruments designated as cash flow hedges or
hedges of foreign currency exposure of net investment in self-sustaining foreign operations, were
recognized in opening Retained earnings as at November 1, 2006. Adjustments arising from
remeasuring financial assets classified as available-for-sale at fair value were recognized in
opening AOCI as at that date.
For hedging relationships existing prior to adopting Section 3865 that continue to qualify for
hedge accounting under the new standard, the transition accounting is as follows: (i) Fair value
hedges — any gain or loss on the hedging instrument was recognized in opening Retained earnings and
the carrying amount of the hedged item was adjusted by the cumulative change in fair value
attributable to the designated hedged risk and was also included in opening Retained earnings; (ii)
Cash flow hedges and hedges of net investments in self-sustaining foreign operations — the
effective portion of any gain or loss on the hedging instrument was recognized in AOCI and the
cumulative ineffective portion was included in opening Retained earnings.
We recorded the following transition adjustments in our Consolidated Financial Statements: (i)
a reduction of $86 million, net of taxes, to our opening Retained earnings, representing changes
made to the value of certain financial instruments and the ineffective portion of qualifying
hedges, in compliance with the measurement basis under the new standards including those related to
the use of fair value option; and (ii) recognition in AOCI of $45 million, net of taxes, related to
the net losses for available-for-sale financial assets and cumulative losses on the effective
portion of our cash flow hedges that are now required to be recognized under Sections 3855 and
3865. In addition, we have reclassified to AOCI $2,004 million of net unrealized foreign currency
losses on net investments in self-sustaining foreign operations that were previously presented as a
separate item in Shareholders’ equity.
Variable Interest Entities
On February 1, 2007, we adopted CICA Emerging Issues Committee Abstract No. 163, Determining the
Variability to be Considered in Applying AcG-15 (EIC-163). EIC-163 provides additional
clarification on how to analyze and consolidate VIEs. The implementation of EIC-163
resulted in the deconsolidation of certain investment funds; however, the impact was not material
to our consolidated financial position or results of operations.
Convertible and Other Debt Instruments with Embedded Derivatives
On August 1, 2007, we adopted CICA
Emerging Issues Committee Abstract No. 164, Convertible and Other Debt Instruments with Embedded
Derivatives (EIC-164). EIC-164 provides clarification regarding the accounting treatment for
certain types of convertible debt instruments, their classification as liabilities or equity, and
the implications on earnings per share. It also provides guidance on whether these instruments
contain any embedded derivatives that are required to be accounted for separately. The adoption of
EIC-164 was not material to our consolidated financial position or results of operations.
Accounting Policy Choice for Transaction Costs
On June 1, 2007, CICA Emerging Issues Committee
issued Abstract No. 166, Accounting Policy Choice for Transaction Costs (EIC-166). This EIC
addresses the accounting policy choice of expensing or adding transaction costs related to the
acquisition of financial assets and financial liabilities that are classified as other than
held-for-trading. Specifically, it requires the same accounting policy choice be applied to all
similar financial instruments classified as other than held-for-trading, but permits a different
policy choice for financial instruments that are not similar. EIC-166 became effective for us on
September 30, 2007 and requires retroactive application to all transaction costs accounted for in
accordance with Section 3855. Our current recognition policy for transaction costs, which was
adopted on November 1, 2006, is consistent with this guidance.
The accounting policies described below have been updated to reflect the requirements under the new
financial instruments accounting standards, and where applicable, include a discussion on the
policies used in the prior periods for comparative purposes.
Translation of foreign currencies
Monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are translated into Canadian
dollars at rates prevailing at the balance sheet date. Non-monetary assets and liabilities are
translated into Canadian dollars at historical rates. Income and expenses denominated in foreign
currencies are translated at average rates of exchange for the year.
Assets and liabilities of our self-sustaining operations with functional currencies other than
the Canadian dollar are translated into Canadian dollars at rates prevailing at the balance sheet
date, and income and expenses of these foreign operations are translated at average rates of
exchange for the year.
Unrealized gains or losses arising as a result of the translation of our foreign
self-sustaining operations along with the effective portion of related hedges are reported as a
component of OCI on an after-tax basis. Prior to November 1, 2006, these amounts were included in
Shareholders’ equity. Upon disposal or dilution of our interest in such investments, an appropriate
portion of the accumulated net translation gains or losses is included in Non-interest income.
Other foreign currency translation gains and losses are included in Non-interest income.
Securities
Securities are classified, based on management’s intentions, as held-for-trading,
available-for-sale or held-to-maturity.
Held-for-trading securities include securities purchased for sale in the near term and
securities designated as held-for-trading under the fair value option are reported at fair value.
Obligations to deliver Trading securities sold but not yet purchased are recorded as liabilities
and carried at fair value. Realized and unrealized gains and losses on these securities are
recorded as Trading revenue in Non-interest income. Dividend and interest income accruing on
Trading securities is recorded in Interest income. Interest and dividends accrued on
interest-bearing and equity securities sold short are recorded in Interest expense.
Royal Bank of Canada: Annual Report 2007
118 Consolidated Financial Statements
Available-for-sale securities include (i) securities which may be sold in response to or in
anticipation of changes in interest rates and resulting prepayment risk, changes in foreign
currency risk, changes in funding sources or terms, or to meet liquidity needs; and (ii) loan
substitute securities which are client financings that have been structured as after-tax
investments rather than conventional loans in order to provide the clients with a borrowing rate
advantage. Available-for-sale securities are measured at fair value with unrealized gains and
losses, including changes in foreign exchange rates, recognized in OCI net of tax. Purchase
premiums or discounts on available-for-sale securities are amortized over the life of the security
using the effective interest method and are recognized in Net interest income. Investments in
equity instruments classified as Available-for-sale that do not have a quoted market price in an
active market are measured at cost.
Held-to-maturity securities are debt securities where we have the intention and ability to
hold the investment until its maturity date. These securities are carried at amortized cost using
the effective interest method. Dividends, interest income and amortization of premiums and
discounts on debt securities are recorded in Net interest income. We hold a nominal amount of
held-to-maturity securities in our normal course of business. All held-to-maturity securities have
been included with Available-for-sale securities on our Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Gains and losses realized on disposal of available-for-sale securities are included in Gain on
sale of securities in Non-interest income. Both available-for-sale and held-to-maturity securities
are subject to periodic impairment review.
Prior to November 1, 2006, all investment securities, other than Trading securities, were
recorded on our Consolidated Balance Sheets as Investment securities at amortized cost, and loan
substitute securities were accorded the accounting treatment applicable to loans and, where
required, reduced by an allowance for credit losses.
We
account for all of our securities using settlement date accounting
except that changes in fair value between the trade date and
settlement date are reflected in income for securities classified or
designated as held-for-trading while changes in the fair value of
available-for-sale securities between the trade and settlement dates
are recorded in OCI.
Assets purchased under reverse repurchase agreements and sold under repurchase agreements
We purchase securities under agreements to resell (reverse repurchase agreements) and take
possession of these securities. Reverse repurchase agreements are treated as collateralized lending
transactions whereby we monitor the market value of the securities purchased and additional
collateral is obtained when appropriate. We also have the right to liquidate the collateral held in
the event of counterparty default. We also sell securities under agreements to repurchase
(repurchase agreements), which are treated as collateralized borrowing transactions.
Reverse repurchase agreements and repurchase agreements are carried on our Consolidated
Balance Sheets at the amounts at which the securities were initially acquired or sold plus accrued
interest, respectively, except when they are designated using the fair value option as
held-for-trading and are recorded at fair value. Interest earned on reverse repurchase agreements
is included in Interest income in our Consolidated Statements of Income, and interest incurred on
repurchase agreements is included in Interest expenses in our Consolidated Statements of Income.
Changes in fair value for reverse repurchase agreements and repurchase agreements carried at fair
value under the fair value option are included in Trading revenue in Non-interest income.
Prior to November 1, 2006, all reverse repurchase agreements and repurchase agreements were
carried on our Consolidated Balance Sheets at the amounts at which the securities were initially
acquired or sold, respectively, plus accrued interest on interest-bearing securities. Interest
earned on reverse repurchase agreements was included in Interest income, and interest incurred on
repurchase agreements was included in Interest expense, in our Consolidated Statements of Income.
Loans
Loans are recorded at amortized cost unless they have been designated as held-for-trading using the
fair value option. Loans recorded at amortized cost are net of an Allowance for loan losses and
unearned income which comprises unearned interest and unamortized loan fees. Loans designated as
held-for-trading are carried at fair value. Prior to November 1, 2006, all loans were presented at
amortized cost net of an Allowance for loan losses and unearned income.
Loans stated at amortized cost are subject to periodic impairment review and are classified as
impaired when, in management’s opinion, there is no longer reasonable assurance of the timely
collection of the full amount of principal or interest. Whenever a payment is 90 days past due,
loans other than credit card balances and loans guaranteed or insured by a Canadian government
(federal or provincial) or a Canadian government agency (collectively “Canadian government”) are
classified as impaired unless they are fully secured and collection efforts are reasonably expected
to result in repayment of debt within 180 days past due. Credit card balances are written off when
a payment is 180 days in arrears. Loans guaranteed by a Canadian government are classified as
impaired when the loan is contractually 365 days in arrears. When a loan is identified as impaired,
the accrual of interest is discontinued and any previously accrued but unpaid interest on the loan
is charged to the Provision for credit losses. Interest received on impaired loans is credited to
the Provision for credit losses. Impaired loans are returned to performing status when all past due
amounts, including interest, have been collected, loan impairment charges have been reversed, and
the credit quality has improved such that timely collection of principal and interest is reasonably
assured.
When an impaired loan is identified, the carrying amount of the loan is reduced to its
estimated realizable amount, measured by discounting the expected future cash flows at the
effective interest rate inherent in the loan. In subsequent periods, recoveries of amounts
previously written off and any increase in the carrying value of the loan are credited to the
Allowance for credit losses on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. Where a portion of a loan is
written off and the remaining balance is restructured, the new loan is carried on an accrual basis
when there is no longer any reasonable doubt regarding the collectibility of principal or interest,
and payments are not 90 days past due.
Assets acquired in respect of problem loans are recorded at their fair value less costs of
disposition. Fair value is determined based on either current market value where available or
discounted cash flows. Any excess of the carrying value of the loan over the recorded fair value of
the assets acquired is recognized by a charge to the Provision for credit losses.
Fees that relate to activities such as originating, restructuring or renegotiating loans are
deferred and recognized as Interest income over the expected term of such loans using the effective
interest method. Where there is reasonable expectation that a loan will result, commitment and
standby fees are also recognized as Interest income over the expected term of the resulting loan
using the effective interest method. Otherwise, such fees are recorded as Other liabilities and
amortized to Non-interest income over the commitment or standby period.
Allowance for credit losses
The Allowance for credit losses is maintained at levels that management considers appropriate to
cover estimated identified credit related losses in the portfolio as well as losses that have been
incurred, but are not yet identifiable as at the balance sheet date. The allowance relates to
on-balance sheet exposures, such as loans and acceptances, and off-balance sheet items such as
letters of credit, guarantees and unfunded commitments.
The allowance is increased by a charge to the Provision for credit losses and decreased by the
amount of write-offs, net of recoveries. The Allowance for credit losses for on-balance sheet items
is included as a reduction to assets, and the allowance relating to off-balance sheet items is
included in Other liabilities.
Royal Bank of Canada: Annual Report 2007
Consolidated Financial Statements 119
NOTE 1 SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES (continued)
The allowance is determined based on management’s identification and evaluation of problem
accounts on estimated losses that exist on the remaining portfolio, and on other factors including
the composition and credit quality of the portfolio, and changes in economic and business
conditions. The Allowance for credit losses consists of Specific allowances and the General
allowance.
Specific allowances
Specific allowances are recorded to recognize estimated losses on both retail and wholesale loans
that have become impaired. The losses relating to wholesale borrowers including small business
loans individually managed are estimated using management’s judgment relating to the timing of
future cash flow amounts that can be reasonably expected from the borrowers, financially
responsible guarantors and the realization of collateral. The amounts expected to be recovered are
reduced by estimated collection costs and discounted at the effective interest rate of the
obligation. The losses relating to retail portfolios, including residential mortgages, and personal
and small business loans managed on a pooled basis are based on net write-off experience. For
credit cards, no specific allowance is maintained as balances are written off when a payment is 180
days in arrears. Personal loans are generally written off at 150 days past due. Write-offs for
other loans are generally recorded when there is no realistic prospect of full recovery.
General allowance
A general allowance is established to cover estimated credit losses incurred in the lending
portfolio that have not yet been specifically identified as impaired. For heterogeneous loans
(wholesale loans including small business loans individually managed), the determination of the
general allowance is based on the application of estimated probability of default, gross exposure
at default and loss factors, which are determined by historical loss experience and delineated by
loan type and rating. For homogeneous portfolios (retail loans) including residential mortgages,
credit cards, as well as personal and small business loans that are managed on a pooled basis, the
determination of the general allowance is based on the application of historical loss rates. In
determining the general allowance level, management also considers the current portfolio credit
quality trends, business and economic conditions, the impact of policy and process changes, and
other supporting factors. In addition, the general allowance includes a component for the model
limitations and imprecision inherent in the allowance methodologies.
Acceptances
Acceptances are short-term negotiable instruments issued by our clients to third parties which we
guarantee. The potential liability under acceptances is reported in Liabilities — Other on our
Consolidated Balance Sheets. The recourse against our clients in the case of a call on these
commitments is reported as a corresponding asset of the same amount in Assets — Other. Fees earned
are reported in Non-interest income.
Derivatives
Derivatives are primarily used in sales and trading activities. Derivatives are also used to manage
our exposures to interest, currency, credit and other market risks. The most frequently used
derivative products are interest rate swaps, interest rate futures, forward rate agreements,
interest rate options, foreign exchange forward contracts, currency swaps, foreign currency
futures, foreign currency options and credit derivatives. All derivative instruments are recorded
on our Consolidated Balance Sheets at fair value, including those derivatives that are embedded in
financial or non-financial contracts that are not closely related to the host contracts.
When derivatives are used in sales and trading activities, the realized and unrealized gains
and losses on derivatives are recognized in Non-interest income-Trading revenue. Derivatives with a
positive fair value are reported as Derivative assets and derivatives with a negative fair value
are reported as Derivative liabilities. Where we have both the legal right and intent to settle
derivative assets and liabilities simultaneously with a counterparty, the net fair value of the
derivative positions is reported as an asset or liability, as appropriate. Margin requirements and
premiums paid are also included in Derivative assets, while premiums received are shown in
Derivative liabilities.
When derivatives are used to manage our own exposures, we determine for each derivative
whether hedge accounting can be applied, as discussed below.
Hedge accounting
We use derivatives and non-derivatives in our hedging strategies to manage our exposure to
interest, currency, credit and other market risks. Where hedge accounting can be applied, a hedge
relationship is designated and documented at inception to detail the particular risk management
objective and the strategy for undertaking the hedge transaction. The documentation identifies the
specific asset, liability or anticipated cash flows being hedged, the risk that is being hedged,
the type of hedging instrument used and how effectiveness will be assessed. The hedging instrument must be highly
effective in accomplishing the objective of offsetting either changes in the fair value or
anticipated cash flows attributable to the risk being hedged both at inception and throughout the
life of the hedge. Hedge accounting is discontinued prospectively when it is determined that the
hedging instrument is no longer effective as a hedge, the hedging instrument is terminated or sold, or upon the
sale or early termination of the hedged item. Refer to Note 2 for the fair value of the derivatives
and non-derivative financial instruments categorized by their hedging relationships, as well as
derivatives that are not designated in hedging relationships.
Fair value hedges
In a fair value hedging relationship, the carrying value of the hedged item is adjusted for changes
in fair value attributable to the hedged risk and recognized in Non-interest income. Changes in the
fair value of the hedged item, to the extent that the hedging relationship is effective, are offset
by changes in the fair value of the hedging derivative, which are also recognized in Non-interest
income. When hedge accounting is discontinued, the carrying value of the hedged item is no longer
adjusted and the cumulative fair value adjustments to the carrying value of the hedged items are
amortized to Net income over the remaining term of the original hedging relationship.
We predominantly use interest rate swaps to hedge our exposure to the changes in a fixed
interest rate instrument’s fair value caused by changes in interest rates. We also use, in limited
circumstances, certain cash instruments to hedge our exposure to the changes in fair value of
monetary assets attributable to changes in foreign currency exchange rates.
Cash flow hedges
In a cash flow hedging relationship, the effective portion of the change in the fair value of the
hedging derivative, net of taxes, is recognized in OCI while the ineffective portion is recognized
in Non-interest income. When hedge accounting is discontinued, the amounts previously recognized in
AOCI are reclassified to Net interest income during the periods when the variability in the cash
flows of the hedged item affects Net interest income. Gains and losses on derivatives are
reclassified immediately to Net income when the hedged item is sold or terminated early. We
predominantly use interest rate swaps to hedge the variability in cash flows related to a variable
rate asset or liability.
Royal Bank of Canada: Annual Report 2007
120 Consolidated Financial Statements
Prior to November 1, 2006, when a derivative was designated and qualified as an effective
hedging instrument in a fair value or cash flow hedge, the income or expense of that derivative was
recognized as an adjustment to Interest income or Interest expense of the hedged item in the same
period. When hedge accounting was discontinued prospectively, the fair value of the derivative was
recognized in Derivative assets or liabilities at that time and the gain or loss was deferred and
recognized in Net interest income in the periods in which the hedged item affects income. When
hedge accounting was discontinued due to the sale or early termination of the hedged item, the fair
value of the derivative was recognized in Derivative assets or liabilities at that time and the
unrealized gain or loss is recognized in Non-interest income.
Net investment hedges
In hedging a foreign currency exposure of a net investment in a self-sustaining foreign operation,
the effective portion of foreign exchange gains and losses on the hedging instruments, net of
applicable taxes, is recognized in OCI and the ineffective portion is recognized in Non-interest
income. The amounts previously recognized in AOCI are recognized in Net income when there is a
reduction in the hedged net investment as a result of a dilution or sale of the net investment, or
reduction in equity of the foreign operation as a result of dividend distributions.
We use foreign exchange contracts and foreign currency-denominated liabilities to manage our
foreign currency exposures to net investments in self-sustaining foreign operations having a
functional currency other than the Canadian dollar.
Prior to November 1, 2006, foreign exchange gains and losses on these hedging instruments, net
of tax, were recorded in Net foreign currency translation adjustments in our Consolidated
Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity.
Premises and equipment
Premises and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is recorded
principally on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of the assets, which are 25 to
50 years for buildings, 3 to 10 years for computer equipment, and 7 to 10 years for furniture,
fixtures and other equipment. The amortization period for leasehold improvements is the lesser of
the useful life of the leasehold improvements or the lease term plus the first renewal period, if
reasonably assured of renewal, up to a maximum of 10 years. Gains and losses on disposal are
recorded in Non-interest income.
Business combinations, goodwill and other intangibles
All business combinations are accounted for using the purchase method. Identifiable intangible
assets are recognized separately from Goodwill and included in Other intangibles. Goodwill
represents the excess of the price paid for the business acquired over the fair value of the net
identifiable assets acquired, and is assigned to reporting units of a business segment. A reporting
unit comprises business operations with similar economic characteristics and strategies, and
is defined by GAAP as the level of reporting at which goodwill is tested for impairment and is
either a business segment or one level below. Upon disposal of a portion of a reporting unit,
goodwill is allocated to the disposed portion based on the fair value of that portion relative to
the total reporting unit.
Goodwill is evaluated for impairment annually as at August 1 or more often if events or
circumstances indicate there may be an impairment. If the carrying value of a reporting unit,
including the allocated goodwill, exceeds its fair value, goodwill impairment is measured as the
excess of the carrying amount of the reporting unit’s allocated goodwill over the implied fair
value of the goodwill, based on the fair value of the assets and liabilities of the reporting unit.
Any goodwill impairment is charged to income in the period in which the impairment is identified.
Subsequent reversals of impairment are prohibited.
Other intangibles with a finite life are amortized on a straight-line basis over their
estimated useful lives, generally not exceeding 20 years, and are also tested for impairment when
conditions exist
which may indicate that the estimated future net cash flows from the asset will be insufficient to
recover its carrying amount.
Income taxes
We use the asset and liability method whereby income taxes reflect the expected future tax
consequences of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets or liabilities for
accounting purposes compared with tax purposes. A future income tax asset or liability is
determined for each temporary difference based on the tax rates that are expected to be in effect
when the underlying items of income and expense are expected to be realized, except for earnings
related to our foreign operations where repatriation of such amounts is not contemplated in the
foreseeable future. Income taxes reported in our Consolidated Statements of Income include the
current and future portions of the expense. Income taxes applicable to items charged or credited to
Shareholders’ equity are netted with such items. Changes in future income taxes related to a change
in tax rates are recognized in the period when the tax rate change is substantively enacted.
Net future income taxes accumulated as a result of temporary differences are included in Other
assets. A valuation allowance is established to reduce future income tax assets to the amount more
likely than not to be realized. In addition, our Consolidated Statements of Income contain items
that are non-taxable or non-deductible for income tax purposes and, accordingly, cause the income
tax provision to be different from what it would be if based on statutory rates.
Pensions and other post-employment benefits
We offer a number of benefit plans, which provide pension and other benefits to eligible employees
(as described in Note 20). These plans include registered defined benefit pension plans,
supplemental pension plans, defined contribution plans and health, dental, disability and life
insurance plans.
Investments held by the pension funds primarily comprise equity and fixed income securities.
Pension fund assets are valued at fair value. For the principal defined benefit plans, the expected
return on plan assets, which is reflected in the pension benefit expense, is calculated using a
market-related value approach. Under this approach, assets are valued at an adjusted market value,
whereby realized and unrealized capital gains and losses are amortized over three years on a
straight-line basis. For the majority of the non-principal and supplemental defined benefit pension
plans, the expected return on plan assets is calculated based on fair value of assets.
Actuarial valuations for the defined benefit plans are performed on a regular basis to
determine the present value of the accrued pension and other post-employment benefits, based on
projections of employees’ compensation levels to the time of retirement and the costs of health,
dental, disability and life insurance.
Our defined benefit pension expense, which is included in Non-interest expenses — Human
resources, consists of the cost of employee pension benefits for the current year’s service,
interest cost on the liability, expected investment return on the market-related value or market
value of plan assets and the amortization of prior service costs, net actuarial gains or losses and
transitional assets or obligations. For some of our defined benefit plans, including the principal
defined benefit plans, actuarial gains or losses are determined each year and amortized over the
expected average remaining service life of employee groups covered by the plan. For the remaining
defined benefit plans, net actuarial gains or losses in excess of the greater of 10% of the plan
assets or the benefit obligation at the beginning of the year are amortized over the expected
average remaining service life of employee groups covered by the plan.
Gains and losses on settlements of defined benefit plans are recognized in income when
settlement occurs. Curtailment gains and losses are recognized in the period when the curtailment
becomes probable and the impact can be reasonably estimated.
Our defined contribution plan expense is included in Non-interest expense-Human resources for
services rendered by employees during the period.
Royal Bank of Canada: Annual Report 2007
Consolidated Financial Statements 121
NOTE 1 SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES (continued)
The cumulative excess of pension fund contributions over the amounts recorded as expenses is
reported as a Prepaid pension benefit cost in Other assets. The cumulative excess of expense over
fund contributions is reported as Accrued pension and other post-employment benefit expense in
Other liabilities.
Stock-based compensation
We offer stock-based compensation plans to certain key employees and to our non-employee directors
as described in Note 21.
We use the fair value method to account for stock options granted to employees whereby
compensation expense is recognized over the applicable vesting period with a corresponding increase
in Contributed surplus. When the options are exercised, the exercise price proceeds together with
the amount initially recorded in Contributed surplus are credited to Common shares. Stock options
granted prior to November 1, 2002, were accounted for using the intrinsic value method, and
accordingly no expense was recognized for these options since the exercise price for such grants
was equal to the closing price on the day before the stock options were granted. These awards fully
vested during 2006. When these stock options are exercised, the proceeds will be recorded as Common
shares.
Options granted between November 29, 1999, and June 5, 2001, were accompanied by tandem stock
appreciation rights (SARs), which gave participants the option to receive cash payments equal to
the excess of the current market price of our shares over the options’ exercise price. SARs
obligations are now fully vested and give rise to compensation expense as a result of changes in
the market price of our common shares. These expenses, net of related hedges, are recorded as
Non-interest expense — Human resources in our Consolidated Statements of Income with a
corresponding increase in Other liabilities on our Consolidated Balance
Sheets.
Our other compensation plans include performance deferred share plans and deferred share unit
plans for key employees (the Plans). The deferred share plans are settled in our common shares or
cash, and the deferred share unit plans are settled in cash. The obligations for the Plans are
accrued over their vesting period. For share-settled awards, our accrued obligations are based on
the market price of our common shares at the date of grant. For cash-settled awards, our accrued
obligations are periodically adjusted for fluctuations in the market price of our common shares and
dividends accrued. Changes in our obligations under the Plans, net of related hedges, are
recorded as Non-interest expense — Human resources in our Consolidated Statements of Income with a
corresponding increase in Other liabilities or Contributed surplus on our Consolidated Balance
Sheets.
The compensation cost attributable to options and awards, granted to employees who are
eligible to retire or will become eligible to retire during the vesting period, is recognized
immediately if the employee is eligible to retire on the grant date or over the period between the
grant date and the date the employee becomes eligible to retire.
Our contributions to the employee savings and share ownership plans are expensed as incurred.
Loan securitization
We periodically securitize loans by selling loans or packaged loans in the form of mortgage-backed
securities (MBS) to independent special purpose entities (SPEs) or trusts that issue securities to
investors. These transactions are accounted for as sales and the transferred assets are removed
from our Consolidated Balance Sheets when we are deemed to have surrendered control over such
assets and have received consideration other than beneficial interests in these transferred loans.
For control to be surrendered, all of the following must
occur: (i) the transferred loans must be isolated from the seller, even in bankruptcy or other
receivership; (ii) the purchaser must have the legal right to sell or pledge the transferred loans
or, if the purchaser is a Qualifying Special Purpose Entity (QSPE) as described in the CICA
Accounting Guideline 12, Transfers of Receivables (AcG-12), its investors have the right to sell or
pledge their ownership interest in the entity; and (iii) the seller must not continue to control
the transferred loans through an agreement to repurchase them or have a right to cause the loans to
be returned. If any one of these conditions is not met, the transfer is considered to be a secured
borrowing, the loans remain on our Consolidated Balance Sheets, and the proceeds are recognized as
a liability.
When MBS are created, we reclassify the loans at their carrying costs into MBS and retained
interests on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. The retained interest represents the excess spread of
loan interest over the MBS rate of return. The initial carrying value of the MBS and the related
retained interests are determined based on their relative fair value on the date of securitization.
MBS are classified as trading account securities or available-for-sale securities, based on
management’s intent. Retained interests are classified as available-for-sale. Both MBS and the
retained interests are subject to periodic impairment review.
Prior to November 1, 2006, retained interests in securitizations that could be contractually
prepaid or otherwise settled in such a way that we would not recover substantially all of our
recorded investment were classified as Investment account securities at amortized cost.
Gains on the sale of loans or MBS are recognized in Non-interest income and are dependent on
the previous carrying amount of the loans or MBS involved in the transfer. To obtain fair values,
quoted market prices are used, if available. When quotes are not available for retained interests,
we generally determine fair value based on the present value of expected future cash flows using
management’s best estimates of key assumptions such as payment rates, weighted average life of the
prepayable receivables, excess spread, expected credit losses and discount rates commensurate with
the risks involved.
For each securitization transaction where we have retained the servicing rights, we assess
whether the benefits of servicing represent adequate compensation. When the benefits of servicing
are more than adequate, a servicing asset is recognized in Other assets. When the benefits of
servicing are not expected to be adequate, we recognize a servicing liability in Other liabilities.
Neither an asset nor a liability is recognized when we have received adequate compensation. A
servicing asset or liability is amortized in proportion to and over the period of estimated net
servicing income.
Insurance
Premiums from long-duration contracts, primarily life insurance, are recognized when due in
Non-interest income — Insurance premiums, investment and fee income. Premiums from short-duration
contracts, primarily property and casualty, and fees for administrative services are recognized in
Insurance premiums, investment and fee income over the related contract period. Unearned premiums
of the short-duration contracts, representing the unexpired portion of premiums, are reported in
Other liabilities. Investments made by our insurance operations are classified as
available-for-sale or loans and receivables, except for investments supporting the policy benefit
liabilities on life and health insurance contracts which are designated as held-for-trading under
the fair value option with changes in fair value reported in Insurance premiums, investment and fee
income.
Insurance claims and policy benefit liabilities represent current claims and estimates for
future insurance policy benefits. Liabilities for life insurance contracts are determined using
the Canadian Asset Liability Method (CALM), which incorporates assumptions for mortality,
Royal Bank of Canada: Annual Report 2007
122 Consolidated Financial Statements
morbidity, policy lapses and surrenders, investment yields, policy dividends, operating and policy
maintenance expenses, and provisions for adverse deviation. These assumptions are reviewed at least
annually and updated in response to actual experience and market conditions. Liabilities for
property and casualty insurance represent estimated provisions for reported and unreported claims.
Liabilities for life and property and casualty insurance are included in Insurance claims and
policy benefit liabilities.
Acquisition costs for new insurance business consist of commissions, premium taxes, certain
underwriting costs and other costs that vary with the acquisition of new business. Deferred
acquisition costs for life insurance products are implicitly recognized in Insurance claims and
policy benefit liabilities by CALM. For property and casualty insurance, these costs are classified
as Other assets and amortized over the policy term.
Segregated funds are lines of business in which we issue a contract where the benefit amount
is directly linked to the market value of the investments held in the underlying fund. The
contractual arrangement is such that the underlying assets are registered in our name but the
segregated fund policyholders bear the risk and rewards of the fund’s investment performance. We
provide minimum death benefit and maturity value guarantees on segregated funds. The liability
associated with these minimum guarantees is recorded in Insurance claims and policy benefit
liabilities. Segregated funds are not included in our Consolidated Financial Statements. We derive
only fee income from segregated funds, which is reflected in Insurance premiums, investment and fee
income. Fee income includes management fees, mortality, policy, administration and surrender
charges.
Prior to November 1, 2006, investments made by our insurance operations were included in
Investment account securities. Realized gains and losses on disposal of fixed income investments
that support life insurance liabilities were deferred and amortized to Insurance premiums,
investment and fee income over the remaining term to maturity of the investments sold, up to a
maximum period of 20 years. For equities that were held to support non-universal life insurance
products, the realized gains and losses were deferred and amortized into Insurance premiums,
investment and fee income at the quarterly rate of 5% of unamortized deferred gains and losses. The
differences between the market value and adjusted carrying cost of these equities were reduced
quarterly by 5%. Equities held to support universal life insurance products were carried at market
value. Realized and unrealized gains or losses on these equities were included in Insurance
premiums, investment and fee income. Specific investments were written down to market value or the
net realizable value if it was determined that any impairment in value was other-than-temporary.
The writedown was recorded against Insurance premiums, investment and fee income in the period the
impairment is recognized.
Liabilities and equity
Financial instruments that will be settled by a variable number of our common shares upon their
conversion by the holders as well as the related accrued distributions are classified as
liabilities on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. Dividends and yield distributions on these
instruments are classified as Interest expense in our Consolidated Statements of Income.
Earnings per share
Earnings per share is computed by dividing Net income available to common shareholders by the
weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period, net of Treasury shares. Net
income available to common shareholders is determined after deducting dividend entitlements of
preferred shareholders and any gain (loss) on redemption of preferred shares net of related income
taxes. Diluted earnings per share reflects the potential dilution that could occur if additional
common shares are assumed to be issued under securities or contracts that entitle their holders to
obtain common shares in the future, to the
extent such entitlement is not subject to unresolved contingencies. The number of additional shares
for inclusion in diluted earnings per share calculations is determined using the treasury stock
method. Under this method, stock options whose exercise price is less than the average market price
of our common shares are assumed to be exercised and the proceeds are used to repurchase common
shares at the average market price for the period. The incremental number of common shares issued
under stock options and repurchased from proceeds is included in the calculation of diluted earnings
per share.
Use of estimates and assumptions
In preparing our Consolidated Financial Statements in conformity with GAAP, management is required
to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, net
income and related disclosures. Certain estimates, including the allowance for credit losses, the
fair value of financial instruments, accounting for securitizations, litigation provisions,
variable interest entities, insurance claims and policy benefit liabilities, pensions and other
post-employment benefits, the carrying value of goodwill, credit card customer loyalty reward
program liability and income taxes, require management to make subjective or complex judgments.
Accordingly, actual results could differ from these and other estimates thereby impacting our
Consolidated Financial Statements.
Change in accounting estimate
During the year, we adjusted the liability associated with our credit card customer loyalty reward
program by $121 million in order to reflect higher program costs. This change in
estimate is reflected as an increase in Other — Other liabilities on our Consolidated Balance Sheets
and as a decrease in Non-interest income — Card service revenue in our Consolidated Statements of
Income.
Change in financial statement presentation
On November 1, 2007, we implemented the International Convergence of Capital Measurement and
Capital Standards: A Revised Framework, known as Basel II. In preparation for this implementation,
we reclassified our loans and credit quality information as either Retail or Wholesale. During the
year, we revisited our presentation of certain assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses for
previous periods to better reflect the nature of these items. Accordingly, certain comparative
amounts have been reclassified to conform with the current year’s presentation. These
reclassifications did not materially impact our consolidated financial position or results of
operations.
Future accounting changes
Capital Disclosures and Financial Instruments — Disclosures and Presentation
On December 1, 2006, the CICA issued three new accounting standards: Handbook Section 1535, Capital
Disclosures (Section 1535), Handbook Section 3862, Financial Instruments — Disclosures (Section
3862), and Handbook Section 3863, Financial Instruments — Presentation (Section 3863). These new
standards became effective for us on November 1, 2007.
Section 1535 specifies the disclosure of (i) an entity’s objectives, policies and processes
for managing capital; (ii) quantitative data about what the entity regards as capital; (iii)
whether the entity has complied with any capital requirements; and (iv) if it has not complied, the
consequences of such non-compliance.
Sections 3862 and 3863 replace Handbook Section 3861, Financial Instruments — Disclosure and
Presentation, revising and enhancing its disclosure requirements, and carrying forward unchanged
its presentation requirements. These new sections place increased emphasis on disclosures about the
nature and extent of risks arising from financial instruments and how the entity manages those
risks.
Royal Bank of Canada: Annual Report 2007
Consolidated Financial Statements 123
The fair value of a financial instrument is the amount at which the financial instrument could be
exchanged in an arm’s-length transaction between knowledgeable and willing parties under no
compulsion to act. Fair values are determined by reference to quoted bid or ask prices, as
appropriate, in the most advantageous active market for that instrument to which we have immediate
access. Where bid and ask prices are unavailable, we use the closing price of the most recent
transaction of that instrument subject to the liquidation adjustments referred to below. In the
absence of an active market, we determine fair values based on prevailing market rates (bid and ask
prices, as appropriate) for instruments with similar characteristics and risk profiles or internal
or external valuation models, such as option pricing models and discounted cash flow analysis,
using observable market-based inputs.
Fair values determined using valuation models require the use of assumptions concerning the
amount and timing of estimated future cash flows and discount rates. In determining those
assumptions, we look primarily to external readily observable market inputs including factors such
as interest rate yield curves, currency rates, and price and rate volatilities, as applicable. In
limited circumstances, we use input parameters that are not based on observable market data with an
adjustment to reflect the uncertainty and to ensure that financial instruments are reported at fair
values. Based on our assessment we believe that using possible alternative assumptions to fair
value such financial instruments will not result in significantly different fair values.
Liquidity adjustments are calculated when market prices are not observable due to insufficient
trading volume or a lack of recent trades in a less active or inactive market. Liquidity
adjustments are also calculated to reflect the cost of unwinding a larger than normal market size
risk position.
All of our derivatives transactions are accounted for on a fair value basis. We record
valuation adjustments that represent the fair value of the credit risk of our derivative
portfolios. These adjustments take into account the creditworthiness of our counterparties, the
current and potential future mark-to-market of the transactions, and the effects of credit
mitigants such as master netting agreements and collateral agreements. Credit valuation adjustments
are recalculated regularly for all of our derivative portfolios. Changes to credit valuation
adjustments are recorded in current period income.
We have documented internal policies that detail our processes for determining fair value,
including the methodologies used in establishing our valuation adjustments. These methodologies are
consistently applied and periodically reviewed by our Risk Management group.
Carrying value and fair value of selected financial instruments
As a result of adopting the new financial instruments accounting standards, certain financial
instruments are now measured at fair value which were previously reported at cost or amortized
cost. This is primarily due to the reclassification of certain securities as Trading securities,
which includes securities designated as held-for-trading using the fair value option. The following
table provides a comparison of carrying and fair values as at October 31, 2007 and October 31,2006, for selected financial instruments:
Assets purchased under reverse repurchase agreements
and securities borrowed
$
—
$
25,522
$
—
$
38,791
$
38,791
$
—
$
64,313
$
64,313
$
59,378
Loans
Retail
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
168,782
$
168,375
$
—
$
168,782
$
168,375
Wholesale
—
3,235
—
65,919
65,910
—
69,154
69,145
Total loans
$
—
$
3,235
$
—
$
234,701
$
234,285
$
—
$
237,936
$
237,520
$
208,638
Other
Derivatives
$
66,585
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
66,585
$
66,585
$
37,682
Other assets
—
164
—
24,653
24,653
—
24,817
24,817
22,660
Financial liabilities
Deposits
Personal
$
—
$
851
$
—
$
115,706
$
115,609
$
—
$
116,557
$
116,460
Business and government
1,639
56,751
—
161,496
161,217
—
219,886
219,607
Bank
—
5,668
—
23,094
23,095
—
28,762
28,763
Total deposits
$
1,639
$
63,270
$
—
$
300,296
$
299,921
$
—
$
365,205
$
364,830
$
343,312
Other
Obligations related to securities sold short
$
44,689
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
44,689
$
44,689
$
38,252
Obligations related to assets sold under repurchase
agreements and securities loaned
—
24,086
—
12,947
12,947
—
37,033
37,033
41,103
Derivatives
72,010
—
—
—
—
—
72,010
72,010
42,108
Other liabilities
—
—
—
36,232
36,262
—
36,232
36,262
28,736
Subordinated debentures
—
77
—
6,158
6,427
—
6,235
6,504
7,384
Trust capital securities
—
—
—
1,400
1,476
—
1,400
1,476
1,532
Preferred share liabilities
—
—
—
300
300
—
300
300
304
(1)
Available-for-sale securities, including loan substitutes, are carried at fair value and
held-to-maturity securities are carried at amortized cost. Prior to November 1, 2006, both
available-for-sale and held-to-maturity securities were classified as Investment securities
and were carried at amortized cost. The prior period comparative amounts have not been
restated.
Royal Bank of Canada: Annual Report 2007
124 Consolidated Financial Statements
The purpose of the table below is to present the carrying value of those financial
instruments that were classified upon adoption as held-for-trading or available-for-sale or
designated as held-for-trading using the fair value option.
Assets purchased under reverse repurchase agreements and securities borrowed
$
—
$
40,535
$
—
Loans
—
2,686
—
Other
Derivatives
37,733
—
—
Other assets
—
527
—
Financial liabilities
Deposits
$
1,651
$
60,859
$
—
Other
Obligations related to securities sold short
38,252
—
—
Obligations related to assets sold under repurchase agreements and securities loaned
—
27,494
—
Derivatives
42,340
—
—
(1)
Includes the value of loan substitutes, which is nominal.
During the year, the fair value of our net financial assets classified as held-for-trading
increased by $2,115 million. The fair value of our net financial assets designated as
held-for-trading increased by $80 million; substantially all of this increase was economically
hedged. The fair value of financial liabilities that we designated as held-for-trading decreased by
$88 million due to changes in our own credit risk.
The following table presents the carrying values of the derivative and non-derivative
financial instruments designated as hedging instruments categorized
by their hedging relationships,
as well as derivatives that are not designated in hedging relationships.
NOTE 2 FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS (continued)
The following table presents the changes in fair value of the financial liabilities designated
as held-for-trading using the fair value option as well as their contractual maturity and carrying
amounts.
Obligations related to assets sold under repurchase agreements and
securities loaned
$
24,087
$
24,086
$
(1
)
$
—
Subordinated debentures
82
77
(5
)
$
(7
)
Total
$
87,468
$
87,433
$
(35
)
$
(88
)
The following table presents information on loans and receivables designated as
held-for-trading using the fair value option, the maximum exposure to credit risk, the extent to
which the risk is mitigated by credit derivatives and similar
instruments, and changes in the fair value of these assets as at
October 31, 2007:
Cumulative
change
Change in
in fair
Change
Cumulative
fair value
value of credit
Carrying
in fair
change in
Extent to
of credit
derivatives
amount of
value since
fair value
which credit
derivatives
or similar
loans and
November 1,
since initial
derivatives
or similar
instruments
receivables
2006
recognition
or similar
instruments
since
Loans and receivables
designated
Maximum
attributable
attributable to
instruments
since
designation
designated as held-for-
as held-
exposure to
to changes in
changes in
mitigate
November 1,
of asset
trading
for-trading
credit risk
credit risk
credit risk
credit risk
2006
at fair value
Interest-bearing deposits with banks
$
4,821
$
4,821
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
—
Assets purchased under reverse repurchase agreements
and securities borrowed
25,522
25,522
—
—
—
—
—
Loans
3,235
3,164
(42
)
(21
)
1,106
18
—
Total
$
33,578
$
33,507
$
(42
)
$
(21
)
$
1,106
$
18
$
—
Royal Bank of Canada: Annual Report 2007
126 Consolidated Financial Statements
Available-for-sale securities, including loan substitutes, are carried at fair value and held-to-maturity securities are carried at
amortized cost. Prior to November 1, 2006, both available-for-sale and held-to-maturity securities were classified as Investment securities and were carried at amortized cost. The prior period comparative amounts have not been restated.
(2)
Actual maturities may differ from contractual maturities shown above, since borrowers may have the right to prepay obligations with or without prepayment penalties.
(3)
OECD stands for Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
(4)
The weighted average yield is based on the carrying value at the end of the year for the respective securities.
(5)
Includes the value of the shares received upon the restructuring of Visa Inc. Refer to Note 30.
Royal Bank of Canada: Annual Report 2007
Consolidated Financial Statements 127
Unrealized gains and losses on Available-for-sale securities (1), (2)
2007
2006
Gross
Gross
Gross
Gross
Amortized
unrealized
unrealized
Fair
Amortized
unrealized
unrealized
Fair
cost
gains
losses
value
cost
gains
losses
value
Canadian government debt
Federal
$
2,665
$
12
$
(1
)
$
2,676
$
3,649
$
29
$
(1
)
$
3,677
Provincial and municipal
279
—
(1
)
278
1,687
248
—
1,935
U.S. government debt
Federal
—
—
—
—
536
—
(28
)
508
State, municipal and agencies
2,039
10
(48
)
2,001
1,678
5
(35
)
1,648
Other OECD government debt
819
1
(2
)
818
758
4
(1
)
761
Mortgage-backed securities
9,002
30
(60
)
8,972
11,805
17
(130
)
11,692
Asset-backed securities
2,004
2
(67
)
1,939
3,164
11
(4
)
3,171
Corporate debt and other debt
9,855
45
(101
)
9,799
11,162
238
(40
)
11,360
Equities
2,715
191
(32
)
2,874
2,537
110
(55
)
2,592
Loan substitute securities
656
—
(4
)
652
656
2
—
658
$
30,034
$
291
$
(316
)
$
30,009
$
37,632
$
664
$
(294
)
$
38,002
(1)
Available-for-sale securities, including loan substitutes,
are carried at fair value and held-to-maturity securities are carried at amortized cost. Prior to November 1, 2006, both
available-for-sale and held-to-maturity securities were classified as
Investment securities and were carried at amortized cost. The prior period comparative amounts have not been restated.
(2)
Includes $5 million held-to-maturity securities.
Realized gains and losses on sale of Available-for-sale securities (1)
2007
2006
2005
Realized gains
$
187
$
177
$
141
Realized losses and writedowns
(124
)
(89
)
(56
)
Net gain on sale of Available-for-sale securities
$
63
$
88
$
85
(1)
Available-for-sale securities, including loan substitutes,
are carried at fair value and held-to-maturity securities are carried at amortized cost. Prior to November 1, 2006, both available-
for-sale and held-to-maturity securities were classified as
Investment securities and were carried at amortized cost. The prior period comparative amounts have not been restated.
Fair value and unrealized losses position for Available-for-sale securities as at October 31, 2007
Less than 12 months
12 months or more
Total
Fair value
Unrealized losses
Fair value
Unrealized losses
Fair value
Unrealized losses
Canadian government debt
Federal
$
1,231
$
1
$
—
$
—
$
1,231
$
1
Provincial and municipal
210
1
—
—
210
1
U.S. government debt
Federal
—
—
—
—
—
—
State, municipal and agencies
—
—
265
48
265
48
Other OECD government debt
47
2
—
—
47
2
Mortgage-backed securities
941
14
994
46
1,935
60
Asset-backed securities
853
5
501
62
1,354
67
Corporate debt and other debt
2,162
57
434
48
2,596
105
Equities
432
30
3
2
435
32
Total temporarily impaired securities
$
5,876
$
110
$
2,197
$206
$
8,073
$
316
The unrealized losses for Canadian government debt and U.S. government debt were caused by
increases in interest rates and appreciation of the Canadian dollar against the U.S. dollar. The
contractual terms of some of these investments either do not permit the issuer to settle the
securities at a price less than the amortized cost of the investment, or permit prepayment of
contractual amounts owing only with prepayment penalties assessed to recover interest foregone. As
a result, it is not expected that these investments would be settled at a price less than the
amortized cost. Further, a substantial amount of the U.S. dollar-denominated debt is hedged against
the foreign currency risk and accordingly, the unrealized losses are not considered to be
other-than-temporarily impaired as at October 31, 2007.
Unrealized losses for mortgage-backed securities, asset-backed securities, corporate debt and
other debt were due to interest rate changes and widening credit spreads caused by the recent
disruption in the financial markets, the weakening of the U.S. housing market,
credit rating downgrades of certain securities in the marketplace, and appreciation of the Canadian
dollar against the U.S. dollar. However, given that a substantial portion of these securities are
investment-grade securities and we have the ability and intent to hold these investments until
there is a recovery of fair value, which may be at maturity, we believe it is probable that we will
be able to collect the principal amount of these securities according to the contractual terms of
the investments. Accordingly, we do not consider these investments to be other-than-temporarily
impaired as at October 31, 2007.
Unrealized losses on equity securities are primarily due to the timing of the market prices,
foreign exchange movements, or the early years in the business cycle of the investees for certain
investments. We do not consider these investments to be other-than-temporarily impaired as at
October 31, 2007, as we have the ability and intent to hold them for a reasonable period of time
until they recover their fair value.
Royal Bank of Canada: Annual Report 2007
128 Consolidated Financial Statements
The following table presents interest and dividends on Available-for-sale and Held-to-maturity
securities:
Interest and dividends on Available-for-sale and Held-to-maturity securities (1)
2007
2006
2005
Taxable interest income
$
968
$
1,087
$
862
Non-taxable interest income
2
2
2
Dividends
74
44
31
$
1,044
$
1,133
$
895
(1)
Available-for-sale securities, including loan substitutes, are carried at
fair value and held-to-maturity securities are carried at amortized cost. Prior to
November 1, 2006, both available-for-sale and held-to-maturity securities were
classified as Investment securities and were carried at amortized cost. The prior
period comparative amounts have not been restated.
NOTE 4 LOANS
2007
2006
Other
Other
Canada
United States
International
Total
Canada
United States
International
Total
Retail (1)
Residential mortgages
$
107,453
$
1,402
$
890
$
109,745
$
94,272
$
1,518
$
885
$
96,675
Personal
42,506
5,283
954
48,743
37,946
6,011
945
44,902
Credit cards
8,142
119
61
8,322
6,966
123
66
7,155
Small business (2)
2,652
—
—
2,652
2,318
—
—
2,318
160,753
6,804
1,905
169,462
141,502
7,652
1,896
151,050
Wholesale (1)
Business (3), (4)
39,877
17,741
6,239
63,857
35,245
13,611
5,894
54,750
Bank
3,114
686
1,547
5,347
2,031
236
985
3,252
Sovereign (5)
416
—
347
763
553
—
334
887
43,407
18,427
8,133
69,967
37,829
13,847
7,213
58,889
Total loans (6)
204,160
25,231
10,038
239,429
179,331
21,499
9,109
209,939
Allowance for loan losses
(1,101
)
(321
)
(71
)
(1,493
)
(1,086
)
(266
)
(57
)
(1,409
)
Total loans net of allowance for loan losses
$
203,059
$
24,910
$
9,967
$
237,936
$
178,245
$
21,233
$
9,052
$
208,530
(1)
Geographic information is based on residence of borrower.
(2)
Includes small business exposure managed on a pooled basis.
(3)
Includes small business exposure managed on an individual client basis.
(4)
Included under Canada for 2007 are loans totalling $1,202 million to a variable interest
entity administered by us.
(5)
Sovereign refers to all central governments and agencies, central banks, as well as other
qualifying public sector entities and multilateral development banks.
(6)
Loans are net of unearned income of $113 million (2006 — $62 million).
Based on the earlier of contractual repricing or maturity date.
(2)
Included in Wholesale are loans totalling $1,202 million to a variable interest entity
administered by us, with maturity terms exceeding five years.
Impaired loans (1),(2)
2007
2006
Specific
Gross
allowances
Net
Net
Retail
Residential mortgages
$
210
$
(23
)
$
187
$
152
Personal
189
(96
)
93
104
Small business (3)
19
(9
)
10
4
$
418
$
(128
)
$
290
$
260
Wholesale
Business (4)
$
722
$
(223
)
$
499
$
311
Bank
—
—
—
—
Sovereign (5)
—
—
—
—
$
722
$
(223
)
$
499
$
311
Total
$
1,140
$
(351
)
$
789
$
571
(1)
There are $353 million (2006 — $305 million) of loans that are contractually 90 days past
due but are not considered impaired.
(2)
Average balance of gross impaired loans was $959 million (2006 — $805 million).
(3)
Includes small business exposure managed on a pooled basis.
(4)
Includes small business exposure managed on an individual client basis.
(5)
Sovereign refers to all central governments and agencies, central banks, as well as other
qualifying public sector entities and multilateral development banks.
Royal Bank of Canada: Annual Report 2007
Consolidated Financial Statements 129
Allowance for off-balance sheet and other items (6)
(77
)
—
—
(2
)
—
(79
)
—
Total allowance for loan losses
$
1,409
$
(868
)
$
170
$
789
$
(7
)
$
1,493
$
1,486
(1)
Primarily represent the translation impact of foreign currency-denominated allowance for
loan losses.
(2)
Includes small business exposure managed on a pooled basis.
(3)
Includes small business exposure managed on an individual client basis.
(4)
Sovereign refers to all central governments and agencies, central banks, as well as other
qualifying public sector entities and multilateral development banks.
(5)
Includes $79 million (2006 — $77 million) related to off-balance sheet and other items.
(6)
The allowance for off-balance sheet and other items is reported separately under Other
liabilities.
During the year ended October 31, 2007, assets acquired in respect of problem loans amounted to
$36 million (2006 — $9 million).
Net interest income after provision for credit losses
2007
2006
2005
Net interest income
$
7,532
$
6,796
$
6,793
Provision for credit losses
791
429
455
Net interest income after provision for credit losses
$
6,741
$
6,367
$
6,338
NOTE 5 SECURITIZATIONS
The following table summarizes our securitization activities for 2007, 2006 and 2005:
2007 (1)
2006
2005
Canadian
Canadian
Canadian
residential
Commercial
Credit
residential
Commercial
Credit
residential
Commercial
mortgage
mortgage
card
mortgage
mortgage
card
mortgage
mortgage
loans (2),(3)
loans (4)
loans (5)
loans (2),(3)
loans
loans (5)
loans (2),(3)
loans
Securitized and sold
$
6,188
$
1,937
$
1,200
$
6,329
$
718
$
1,200
$
3,752
$
655
Net cash proceeds received
6,097
1,876
400
6,210
729
600
3,739
667
Asset-backed securities purchased
—
47
794
—
—
596
—
—
Retained rights to future excess interest
146
—
9
121
—
8
100
—
Pre-tax gain (loss) on sale
55
(14
)
3
2
11
4
87
12
(1)
We did not securitize any credit card loans during the year.
(2)
All Canadian residential mortgage loans securitized are
insured.
(3)
Canadian insured residential mortgage loans securitized during the year through the creation of mortgage-backed securities and
retained as at October 31, 2007 were $3,110 million (2006 –
$4,869 million, 2005 – $1,050 million).
These securities are carried at fair value; prior to November 1, 2006, these securities were
carried at amortized cost.
(4)
The net cash proceeds received represent gross proceeds of $1,923 million less
funds used to purchase notes of $47 million (principal value of
$48 million). We did not
purchase any notes as part of our securitization activities in 2006 or 2005.
(5)
The net cash proceeds received represent gross proceeds of $1,200 million in 2006
(2005 — $1,200 million) less funds used to purchase notes issued by Golden Credit
Card Trust with a principal value of $800 million in 2006 (2005 — $600 million).
In addition to the above securitization transactions, we sold $815 million of
residential mortgage loans in 2006, resulting in a pre-tax loss of $3 million. None
were sold in 2007.
Royal Bank of Canada: Annual Report 2007
130 Consolidated Financial Statements
This analysis is not applicable for commercial mortgage loans securitizations as we have
not retained rights to future excess spread in these transactions.
(2)
Includes servicing fees received.
The key assumptions used to value the retained interests at the date of the securitization
activities are as follows:
Key assumptions (1), (2)
2007 (3)
2006
2005
Canadian residential
Credit
Canadian residential
Credit
Canadian residential
mortgage loans
card
mortgage loans
card
mortgage loans
Variable rate
Fixed rate
loans
Variable rate
Fixed rate
loans
Variable rate
Fixed rate
Expected weighted average life of
prepayable receivables (in years)
2.63
3.69
.16
2.61
3.60
.15
3.48
3.59
Payment rate
29.20
%
14.38
%
40.02
%
30.00
%
15.39
%
40.06
%
13.52
%
13.36
%
Excess spread, net of credit losses
.88
.83
5.13
1.18
.99
6.88
.20
1.06
Expected credit losses
—
—
2.15
—
—
1.75
—
—
Discount rate
4.71
%
4.80
%
10.00
4.32
4.36
10.00
3.64
3.59
(1)
All rates are annualized except the payment rate for credit card loans which is monthly.
(2)
This analysis is not applicable for commercial mortgage loans securitizations as we have
not retained rights to future excess spread in these transactions.
(3)
We did not securitize any credit card loans during the year.
Static pool credit losses include actual incurred and projected credit losses divided by the
original balance of the loans securitized. The expected static pool credit loss ratio for
securitized credit card loans at October 31, 2007 was .52%. Static credit pool losses are not
applicable to residential mortgages as substantially all the mortgages are government guaranteed.
The following table summarizes the loan principal, past due and net write-offs for total loans
reported on our Consolidated Balance Sheets and securitized loans that we manage as at October 31,2007 and 2006:
Loans managed
2007
2006
Loan principal
Past due(1)
Net write-offs
Loan principal
Past due (1)
Net write-offs
Retail
$
192,633
$
754
$
718
$
172,118
$
654
$
597
Wholesale
69,967
739
66
58,889
485
(4
)
Total loans managed (2)
262,600
1,493
784
231,007
1,139
593
Less: Loans securitized and managed
Credit card loans
3,650
—
86
3,650
—
85
Canadian residential mortgage-backed securities
created and sold
14,239
—
—
12,186
—
—
Canadian residential mortgage-backed securities
created and retained
5,282
—
—
5,232
—
—
Total loans reported on the Consolidated Balance Sheets
$
239,429
$
1,493
$
698
$
209,939
$
1,139
$
508
(1)
Includes impaired loans as well as loans that are contractually 90 days past due but are
not considered impaired.
(2)
Excludes any assets we have temporarily acquired with the intent at acquisition to sell to SPEs.
Royal Bank of Canada: Annual Report 2007
Consolidated Financial Statements 131
Key assumptions are used to determine the
fair value of our retained interests. The
following table is a summary of the key
assumptions used as at October 31, 2007 and
the sensitivity of the current fair value of
our retained interests to immediate 10% and
20% adverse changes in these key assumptions.
Increase
(decrease) in fair value of retained interests due to adverse changes in key assumptions
(1), (2)
2007
Credit
Canadian residential
card
mortgage loans
loans
Variable rate
Fixed rate
Fair value of retained interests
$
27.5
$
27.9
$
386.7
Weighted average remaining service life (in years)
.25
2.63-3.27
3.05-3.97
Payment rate
37.39
%
29.20-40.00
%
9.25-18.00
%
Impact on fair value of 10% adverse change
$
(1.6
)
$
(.8
)
$
(9.4
)
Impact on fair value of 20% adverse change
(3.2
)
(1.5
)
(18.6
)
Excess spread, net of credit losses
5.72
%
.68-.88
%
.84-.89
%
Impact on fair value of 10% adverse change
$
(5.0
)
$
(14.0
)
$
(37.1
)
Impact on fair value of 20% adverse change
(10.0
)
(28.0
)
74.3
Expected credit losses
2.18
%
—
%
—
%
Impact on fair value of 10% adverse change
$
(1.2
)
$
—
$
—
Impact on fair value of 20% adverse change
(2.3
)
—
—
Discount rate
10.00
%
4.71-6.81
%
4.69-4.71
%
Impact on fair value of 10% adverse change
$
—
$
(.2
)
$
(2.3
)
Impact on fair value of 20% adverse change
(.1
)
(.3
)
(4.5
)
(1)
All rates are annualized except for the credit card loans payment rate which is monthly.
(2)
This analysis is not applicable for commercial mortgage loans
securitizations as we have not retained rights to future excess spread in these transactions.
These sensitivities are hypothetical and should be used with caution. Changes in fair value based
on a variation in assumptions generally cannot be extrapolated because the relationship of the
change in assumptions to the change in fair value may not be linear. The effect of
a variation in a particular assumption on the fair value of the retained interests is calculated
without changing any other assumptions. Generally, the changes in one factor may result in changes
in another, which may magnify or counteract the sensitivity.
NOTE 6 VARIABLE INTEREST ENTITIES (VIEs)
The following table provides information about VIEs as at October 31, 2007 and 2006, in which we
have significant variable interests, and those we consolidate under CICA Accounting Guideline
15,
Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities (AcG-15), because we are the Primary Beneficiary.
Unconsolidated VIEs in which we have significant variable interests (1):
Multi-seller conduits (2)
$
41,785
$
42,912
$
34,258
$
35,031
Third-party conduits
4,264
1,625
2,697
1,018
Credit investment product VIEs
2,676
1,733
—
—
Investment funds
1,517
324
3,390
303
Structured finance VIEs
407
407
2,592
1,465
Other
60
80
128
84
$
50,709
$
47,081
$
43,065
$
37,901
Consolidated VIEs (3), (4):
Investment funds (5)
$
995
$
1,851
Structured finance VIEs
560
409
Credit investment product VIEs
276
689
Compensation vehicles
83
355
Other
144
151
$
2,058
$
3,455
(1)
The maximum exposure to loss resulting from our significant variable interests in these VIEs
consists mostly of investments, loans, liquidity facilities and fair value of derivatives.
We have recognized $2,165 million (2006–$2,130 million) of this exposure on our Consolidated
Balance Sheets.
(2)
Total assets represent maximum assets that may have to be purchased by the conduits under
purchase commitments outstanding as at October 31, 2007. Actual assets held by these
conduits as at October 31, 2007, were $29,290 million (2006—$24,811 million).
(3)
The assets that support the obligations of the consolidated VIEs are reported on our
Consolidated Balance Sheets primarily as follows: Interest-bearing deposits with banks of
$75 million (2006—$120 million), Trading securities of $1,185 million (2006—$2,483 million),
Available-for-sale securities of $315 million (2006—$409 million) and Other assets of
$401 million (2006—$287 million). The compensation vehicles hold $83 million (2006—$156
million) of our common shares, which are reported as Treasury shares. The obligation to
provide common shares to employees is recorded as an increase to Contributed surplus as the
expense for the corresponding stock-based compensation plan is recognized.
(4)
Investors have recourse only to the assets of the related VIEs and do not have recourse to our
general assets unless we breach our contractual obligations relating to those VIEs, provide
liquidity facilities or credit enhancement facilities to, or enter into derivative
transactions with, the VIEs.
(5)
The implementation of EIC-163 (refer to Note 1) resulted in the deconsolidation of certain
investment funds during 2007. As at October 31, 2006, the total assets and maximum exposure
to loss of these deconsolidated funds were $363 million and $36 million, respectively.
Royal Bank of Canada: Annual Report 2007
132 Consolidated Financial Statements
We administer seven multi-seller asset-backed commercial paper conduit programs (multi-seller
conduits). These conduits primarily purchase
financial assets from clients and finance those purchases by issuing asset-backed commercial paper.
Our clients primarily utilize multi-seller conduits to diversify their financing sources and to
reduce funding costs.
The
multi-seller conduits also finance assets that are either in the form
of securities, including Collateralized Debt Obligations, or instruments
that closely resemble securities such as credit-linked notes. In these situations, the multi-seller
conduit is often one of many investors in the securities or security-like instruments.
An unrelated third party (expected loss investor) absorbs credit losses, up to a maximum
contractual amount, that may occur in the future on the assets in the multi-seller conduits
(multi-seller conduit first-loss position) before the multi-seller conduits’ debt holders and us.
In return for assuming this multi-seller conduit first-loss position, each multi-seller conduit
pays the expected loss investor a return commensurate with its risk position. The expected loss
investor absorbs a majority of each multi-seller conduit’s expected losses, when compared to us;
therefore, we are not the Primary Beneficiary and do not consolidate these conduits under AcG-15.
However, we continue to hold a significant variable interest in these multi-seller conduits
resulting from our provision of backstop liquidity facilities, partial credit enhancement and
entitlement to residual fees.
We hold significant variable interests in third-party asset-backed security conduits primarily
through providing liquidity support and credit enhancement facilities. However we are not the
Primary Beneficiary and do not consolidate these conduits under AcG-15.
The liquidity and credit enhancement facilities are included and described in our disclosure
on guarantees in Note 27.
Investment funds
We enter into derivatives with third parties including mutual funds, unit investment trusts and
other investment funds to provide their investors with the desired exposure and hedge our exposure
from these derivatives by investing in other funds. We are the Primary Beneficiary when our
participation in the derivative or our investment in other funds exposes us to a majority of the
respective expected losses.
Structured finance VIEs
We finance VIEs that are part of transactions structured to achieve a desired outcome such
as limiting exposure to specific assets or risks, obtaining indirect exposure to financial assets,
supporting an enhanced yield, funding specific assets and meeting client requirements. We
consolidate structured finance VIEs in which our interests expose us to a majority of the expected
losses.
Creation of credit investment products
We use VIEs to generally transform credit derivatives into cash instruments, to distribute
credit risk and to create customized credit products to meet investors’ specific requirements. We
enter into derivative contracts with these entities in order to convert various risk factors such
as yield, currency or credit risk of underlying assets to meet the needs of the investors. We
transfer assets to these VIEs as collateral for notes issued but the transfer of assets
does not meet sale recognition criteria under AcG-12. In certain instances, we invest in the notes
issued by these VIEs, which requires us to consolidate them when we are the Primary
Beneficiary.
Compensation vehicles
We use compensation trusts, which primarily hold our own common shares, to economically hedge our
obligation to certain employees under some of our stock-based compensation programs. We consolidate
the trusts in which we are the Primary Beneficiary.
Capital trusts
RBC Subordinated Notes Trust (Trust III) was created in 2007 to issue $1 billion of innovative
subordinated debentures and RBC Capital Trust II (Trust II) was created in 2003 to issue $900
million of innovative capital instruments. We issued senior deposit notes of the same amounts to
Trust II, and a senior deposit note of $999.8 million to Trust III. Although we own the common
equity and voting control of these trusts, we are not the Primary Beneficiary since we are not
exposed to the majority of the expected losses, and we do not have a significant interest in these
trusts. For details on our innovative capital instruments, refer to Note 17.
Securitization of our financial assets
We employ SPEs in the process of securitizing our assets, none of which are consolidated under
AcG-15. One entity is a QSPE under AcG-12, which is specifically exempt from consolidation under
AcG-15, and our level of participation in each of the remaining SPEs relative to others does not
expose us to a majority of the expected losses. We also do not have significant interests in these
SPEs. For details on our securitization activities, refer to Note 5.
NOTE 7 DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS AND HEDGING ACTIVITIES
Derivative financial instruments are financial contracts whose value is derived from an underlying
interest rate, foreign exchange rate, equity or commodity instrument or index.
Types of derivatives
Forwards and futures
Forward contracts are effectively tailor-made agreements that are transacted between counterparties
in the over-the-counter market, whereas futures are standardized contracts with respect to amounts
and settlement dates, and are traded on regular future exchanges. Examples of forwards and futures
are described below:
Interest rate forwards (forward rate agreements) and futures are contractual obligations to
buy or sell an interest-rate sensitive financial instrument on a predetermined future date at a
specified price.
Foreign exchange forwards and futures are contractual obligations to exchange one currency for
another at a specified price for settlement at a predetermined future date.
Equity forwards and futures are contractual obligations to buy or sell at a fixed value (the
contracted price) of an equity index, a basket of stocks or a single stock at a predetermined
future date.
Swaps
Swaps are over-the-counter contracts in which two counterparties exchange a series of cash flows
based on agreed upon rates to a notional amount. The various swap agreements that we enter into are
as follows:
Interest rate swaps are agreements where two counterparties exchange a series of payments
based on different interest rates applied to a notional amount in a single currency. Cross currency
swaps involve the exchange of fixed payments in one currency for the receipt of fixed payments in
another currency. Cross currency interest rate swaps involve the exchange of both interest and
principal amounts in two different currencies.
Equity swaps are contracts in which one counterparty agrees to pay or receive from the other
cash flows based on changes in the value of an equity index, a basket of stocks or a single stock.
Royal Bank of Canada: Annual Report 2007
Consolidated Financial Statements 133
NOTE 7 DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS AND HEDGING ACTIVITIES (CONTINUED)
Options
Options are contractual agreements under which the seller (writer) grants the purchaser the right,
but not the obligation, either to buy (call option) or sell (put option), a security, exchange
rate, interest rate, or other financial instrument or commodity at a predetermined price, at or by
a specified future date. The seller (writer) of an option can also settle the contract by paying
the cash settlement value of the purchaser’s right. The seller (writer) receives a premium from the
purchaser for this right. The various option agreements that we enter into include interest rate
options, foreign currency options and equity options.
Credit derivatives
Credit derivatives are over-the-counter contracts that transfer credit risk related to an
underlying financial instrument (referenced asset) from one counterparty to another. Examples of
credit derivatives include credit default swaps, credit default baskets and total return swaps.
Credit default swaps provide protection against the decline in value of the referenced asset
as a result of specified credit events such as default or bankruptcy. It is similar in structure to
an option whereby the purchaser pays a premium to the seller of the credit default swap in return
for payment related to the deterioration in the value of the referenced asset. Credit default
baskets are similar to credit default swaps except that the underlying referenced financial
instrument is a group of assets instead of a single asset.
Total return swaps are contracts where one counterparty agrees to pay or receive from the
other cash flows based on changes in the value of the referenced asset.
Other derivative products
We also transact in other derivative products including precious metal and commodity derivative
contracts in both the over-the-counter and exchange markets. Certain warrants and loan commitments
that meet the definition of derivative are also included as derivative instruments.
Derivatives issued for trading purposes
Most of our derivative transactions relate to sales and trading activities. Sales activities
include the structuring and marketing of derivative products to clients to enable them to transfer,
modify or reduce current or expected risks. Trading involves market-making, positioning and
arbitrage activities. Market-making involves quoting bid and offer prices to other market
participants with the intention of generating revenue based on spread and volume. Positioning
involves managing market risk positions with the expectation of profiting from favourable movements
in prices, rates or indices. Arbitrage activities involve identifying and profiting from price
differentials between markets and products.
Derivatives
issued for other than trading purposes
We also use derivatives for purposes other than trading, primarily for hedging, in conjunction with
the management of interest rate, credit and foreign exchange risk related to our own
asset/liability management, funding and investment activities.
Interest rate swaps are used to adjust exposure to interest rate risk by modifying the
repricing or maturity characteristics of existing and/or anticipated assets and liabilities,
including funding and investment activities. Purchased interest rate options are used to hedge
redeemable deposits and other options embedded in consumer products. We manage our exposure to
foreign currency risk with cross currency swaps and foreign exchange forward contracts. We use
credit derivatives to manage our credit exposures and for risk diversification in our lending
portfolio.
Certain derivatives and cash instruments are specifically designated and qualify for hedge
accounting. We apply hedge accounting to minimize significant unplanned fluctuations in earnings
caused by changes in interest rates or foreign exchange rates. Interest rate and currency
fluctuations will either cause assets and liabilities to appreciate or depreciate in market value
or cause variability in anticipated cash flows. When a hedging instrument functions effectively,
gains, losses, revenue and expenses of the hedging instrument will offset the gains, losses,
revenue and expenses of the hedged item. When derivatives are designated as the hedging instrument,
all components of each derivative’s change in fair value are included in the assessment and
measurement of hedge effectiveness. When cash instruments are designated for hedges of currency
risks, only changes in their value due to currency risk are included in the assessment and
measurement of hedge effectiveness.
We did not apply hedge accounting to any anticipated transactions or firm commitments during
the year. As at October 31, 2007, after-tax net unrealized gains of $24 million were recognized in
AOCI, representing the cumulative effective portions of our cash flow hedges. The net amount of
gains and losses reported in AOCI that is expected to be reclassified to Net interest income within
the next 12 months is not estimated to be material.
From time to time, we also enter into derivative transactions to economically hedge certain
business strategies that do not otherwise qualify for hedge accounting, or where hedge accounting
is not considered economically feasible to implement. In such circumstances, changes in fair value
are reflected in Non-interest income.
Hedge activities
2007
After-tax
Net gains (losses)
Net gains (losses)
unrealized
included in
included in
gains (losses)
Non-interest income
Net interest income
included in OCI
Fair value hedges
Ineffective portion
$
(14
)
$
n.a.
$
n.a.
Cash flow hedges
Ineffective portion
(9
)
n.a.
n.a.
Effective portion
n.a.
n.a.
80
Reclassified to income during the year (1)
n.a.
(47
)
n.a.
Net investment hedges
Foreign currency losses
n.a.
n.a.
(2,965
)
Gains from hedges
n.a.
n.a.
1,804
(1)
An after-tax equivalent amount of $31 million was reclassified from AOCI.
n.a.
not applicable
Royal Bank of Canada: Annual Report 2007
134 Consolidated Financial Statements
Notional amount of derivatives by term to maturity
Term to maturity
2007
2006
Within
1 to
Over 5
Other than
Other than
1 year
5 years
years (1)
Total
Trading
trading
Trading
trading
Over-the-counter contracts
Interest rate contracts
Forward rate agreements
$
197,733
$
4,120
$
—
$
201,853
$
201,853
$
—
$
315,378
$
—
Swaps
896,816
907,875
449,855
2,254,546
2,096,153
158,393
1,874,206
140,232
Options purchased
22,986
35,405
32,197
90,588
89,585
1,003
99,172
86
Options written
38,403
39,854
71,485
149,742
149,169
573
73,566
—
Foreign exchange contracts
Forward contracts
706,342
21,149
14,285
741,776
710,961
30,815
626,484
33,033
Cross currency swaps
2,648
7,978
7,521
18,147
17,748
399
18,553
1,072
Cross currency interest rate swaps
53,818
141,584
82,936
278,338
242,319
36,019
228,090
20,707
Options purchased
28,961
7,472
330
36,763
36,756
7
65,572
71
Options written
30,500
7,559
296
38,355
38,355
—
68,337
51
Credit derivatives (2)
18,548
183,650
197,026
399,224
393,247
5,977
219,054
2,722
Other contracts (3)
22,614
20,129
31,203
73,946
73,804
142
86,548
573
Exchange-traded contracts
Interest rate contracts
Futures—long positions
68,553
8,806
5
77,364
77,086
278
146,886
524
Futures—short positions
112,912
19,278
2
132,192
132,008
184
211,131
901
Options purchased
14,945
19
—
14,964
14,964
—
71,926
—
Options written
4,656
—
—
4,656
4,656
—
119,194
—
Foreign exchange contracts
Futures—long positions
100
227
—
327
327
—
6,070
—
Futures—short positions
9,521
168
—
9,689
9,689
—
26,088
—
Other contracts (3)
252,784
1,396
26
254,206
254,206
—
257,154
—
$
2,482,840
$
1,406,669
$
887,167
$
4,776,676
$
4,542,886
$
233,790
$
4,513,409
$
199,972
(1)
Includes contracts maturing in over 10 years with a notional value of $205,976 million
(2006 —$135,951 million). The related gross positive replacement cost is $10,910 million
(2006—$3,857 million).
(2)
Comprises credit default swaps, total return swaps and credit default baskets, including
credit derivatives given guarantee treatment for the OSFI regulatory reporting purposes.
Credit derivatives with a notional value of $5,530 million (2006—$2,116 million) are
economic hedges.
(3)
Comprises precious metal, commodity and equity-linked
derivative contracts other than embedded
equity-linked contracts.
The following table provides the fair value of our derivative financial instruments:
Fair value of derivative instruments
2007
2006
Average fair value
Year-end
Average fair value
Year-end
for year ended (1)
fair value
for year ended (1)
fair value
Positive
Negative
Positive
Negative
Positive
Negative
Positive
Negative
Held or issued for trading purposes
Interest rate contracts
Forward rate agreements
$
44
$
49
$
72
$
25
$
52
$
50
$
44
$
60
Swaps
13,938
14,241
14,250
14,446
12,150
12,003
12,258
11,969
Options purchased
621
—
488
—
795
—
602
—
Options written
—
786
—
625
—
888
—
698
14,603
15,076
14,810
15,096
12,997
12,941
12,904
12,727
Foreign exchange contracts
Forward contracts
8,342
8,508
14,503
14,410
6,740
6,969
5,493
5,758
Cross currency swaps
2,231
1,522
3,066
2,141
2,041
1,522
2,151
1,522
Cross currency interest rate swaps
8,987
9,419
13,634
14,250
7,010
8,275
6,703
8,319
Options purchased
1,044
—
1,221
—
1,571
—
1,055
—
Options written
—
1,028
—
1,302
—
1,582
—
994
20,604
20,477
32,424
32,103
17,362
18,348
15,402
16,593
Credit derivatives (2)
3,964
3,508
10,416
9,375
1,139
975
1,795
1,580
Other contracts (3)
6,096
9,537
4,925
10,317
5,623
8,803
5,798
9,221
$
45,267
$
48,598
$
62,575
$
66,891
$
37,121
$
41,067
$
35,899
$
40,121
Held or issued for other than trading purposes
Interest rate contracts
Swaps
$
1,110
$
760
$
1,100
$
940
Options purchased
6
—
—
—
Options written
—
25
—
—
1,116
785
1,100
940
Foreign exchange contracts
Forward contracts
921
503
102
236
Cross currency swaps
2
9
5
5
Cross currency interest rate swaps
1,371
3,635
607
631
Options purchased
—
—
1
—
Options written
—
—
—
1
2,294
4,147
715
873
Credit derivatives (2)
36
30
20
30
Other contracts (3)
20
42
85
281
3,466
5,004
1,920
2,124
Total gross fair values before netting (4)
66,041
71,895
37,819
42,245
Impact of master netting agreements
With intent to settle net or simultaneously (5)
(473
)
(473
)
(137
)
(137
)
Without intent to settle net or simultaneously (6)
(38,256
)
(38,256
)
(18,952
)
(18,952
)
Total
$
27,312
$
33,166
$
18,730
$
23,156
(1)
Average fair value amounts are calculated based on monthly balances.
(2)
Comprises credit default swaps, total return swaps and credit default baskets, including credit
derivatives given guarantee treatment for the OSFI regulatory reporting purposes.
(3)
Comprises precious metal, commodity and equity-linked derivative contracts. Certain warrants
and loan commitments that meet the definition of derivatives are also included.
(4)
The positive year-end fair value excludes margin requirements of $1,017 million (2006—$721
million) and the negative year-end fair value excludes market and
credit valuation adjustments of
$588 million (2006—$366 million).
(5)
Impact of offsetting credit exposures on contracts where we have both a legally enforceable
master netting agreement in place and we intend to settle the contracts on either a net basis
or simultaneously.
(6)
Additional impact of offsetting credit exposures on contracts where we have a legally
enforceable master netting agreement in place but do not intend to settle the contracts on a
net basis or simultaneously.
Royal Bank of Canada: Annual Report 2007
Consolidated Financial Statements 135
NOTE 7 DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS AND HEDGING ACTIVITIES (continued)
Derivative-related credit risk
Credit risk from derivative transactions is generated by the potential for the counterparty to
default on its contractual obligations when one or more transactions have a positive market value
to us. Therefore, derivative-related credit risk is represented by the positive fair value of the
instrument and is normally a small fraction of the contract’s notional amount.
We subject our derivative-related credit risk to the same credit approval, limit and
monitoring standards that we use for managing other transactions that create credit exposure. This
includes evaluating the creditworthiness of counterparties, and managing the size, diversification
and maturity structure of the portfolio. Credit utilization for all products is compared with
established limits on a continual basis and is subject to a standard exception reporting process.
We utilize a single internal rating system for all credit risk exposure. In most cases, these
internal ratings approximate the external risk ratings of public rating agencies.
Netting is a technique that can reduce credit exposure from derivatives and is generally
facilitated through the use of master netting agreements. The master netting agreement provides for
a single net settlement of all financial instruments covered by the agreement in the event of
default. However, credit risk is reduced only to the extent that our financial obligations to the
same counterparty can be set off against obligations of the counterparty to us. The two main
categories of netting are close-out netting and settlement netting. Under the close-out netting
provision, if the counterparty defaults, we have the right to terminate all transactions covered by
the master netting agreement at the then-prevailing market values and to sum the resulting market
values, offsetting negative against positive values, to arrive at a single net amount owed by
either the counterparty or us. Under the settlement netting provision, all payments and receipts in
the same currency and due on the same day between specified branches are netted, generating a
single payment in each currency, due either by us or the counterparty. We maximize the use of
master netting agreements to reduce derivative-related credit exposure. Our overall exposure to credit
risk that is reduced through master netting agreements may change substantially following the
reporting date as the exposure is affected by each transaction subject to the agreement as well as
by changes in underlying market rates. Measurement of our credit exposure arising out of derivative
transactions is reduced to reflect the effects of netting in cases where the enforceability of that
netting is supported by appropriate legal analysis as documented in our trading credit risk
policies.
The use of collateral is another significant credit mitigation technique for managing
derivative-related counterparty credit risk. Marked-to-market provisions in our agreements with
some counterparties, typically in the form of a Credit Support Annex, provide RBC with the right to
request that the counterparty pay down or collateralize the current market value of its derivatives
positions when the value passes a specified threshold amount.
During 2007, 2006 and 2005, neither our
actual credit losses arising from derivative transactions nor the level of impaired derivative
contracts were significant. The tables below show replacement
cost, credit equivalent and risk-adjusted amounts of our
derivatives both before and after the impact of netting.
Replacement cost represents the total fair value of all outstanding contracts in a gain
position, before factoring in the master netting agreements. The amounts in the table below exclude
fair value of $955 million (2006—$734 million) relating to exchange-traded instruments as they are
subject to daily margining and are deemed to have no credit risk.
The credit equivalent amount is defined as the sum of the replacement cost plus an add-on
amount for potential future credit exposure as defined by the OSFI.
The risk-adjusted amount is determined by applying the standard OSFI-defined measures of
counterparty risk to the credit equivalent amount.
Derivative-related credit risk
2007
2006
Replacement
Credit equivalent
Risk-adjusted
Replacement
Credit equivalent
Risk-adjusted
cost
amount
balance
cost
amount
balance
Interest rate contracts
Forward rate agreements
$
72
$
92
$
22
$
44
$
109
$
22
Swaps
15,360
23,484
5,213
13,358
21,031
4,452
Options purchased
364
1,032
248
591
1,164
260
15,796
24,608
5,483
13,993
22,304
4,734
Foreign exchange contracts
Forward contracts
15,424
22,222
5,674
5,595
12,413
3,310
Swaps
18,073
32,901
6,138
9,466
22,697
4,305
Options purchased
1,221
1,832
466
1,056
2,244
502
34,718
56,955
12,278
16,117
37,354
8,117
Credit derivatives (1)
10,416
35,026
8,465
1,795
6,975
2,009
Other contracts (2)
4,120
6,723
2,251
5,160
8,696
2,760
Derivatives before master netting agreements
$
65,050
$
123,312
$
28,477
$
37,065
$
75,329
$
17,620
Impact of master netting agreements
(38,729
)
(65,339
)
(14,020
)
(19,089
)
(31,831
)
(7,188
)
Total derivatives after master netting agreement (3)
$
26,321
$
57,973
$
14,457
$
17,976
$
43,498
$
10,432
(1)
Comprises credit default swaps, total return swaps and credit
default baskets. The above excludes credit
derivatives issued for other than trading purposes related to bought
and sold protection with a replacement cost of $36 million (2006
— $20 million). Credit derivatives issued for other than
trading purposes related to sold protection with a replacement
cost of $.4 million (2006 — $20 million) had a credit
equivalent amount of $447 million (2006 — $283 million) and
risk-adjusted asset amount of $447 million (2006 —
$283 million) which were given guarantee treatment per
the OSFI guidance.
(2)
Comprises precious metal, commodity and equity-linked derivative contracts.
(3)
The total credit equivalent amount after netting includes collateral applied of $2,228
million (2006 — $1,310 million).
Royal Bank of Canada: Annual Report 2007
136 Consolidated Financial Statements
Our internal risk ratings for major counterparty types approximate those of public
rating agencies. Ratings of AAA, AA, A and BBB represent investment grade ratings and ratings of BB
or lower represent non-investment grade ratings.
(2)
Counterparty type is defined in accordance with the capital adequacy requirements of the
OSFI.
(3)
Includes credit derivatives issued for other than trading purposes with a total
replacement cost of $36 million (2006 — $20 million).
NOTE 8 PREMISES AND EQUIPMENT
2007
2006
Accumulated
Net book
Accumulated
Net book
Cost
depreciation
value
Cost
depreciation
value
Land
$
133
$
—
$
133
$
134
$
—
$
134
Buildings
553
333
220
511
321
190
Computer equipment
3,049
1,986
1,063
2,462
1,698
764
Furniture, fixtures and other equipment
1,059
764
295
1,012
736
276
Leasehold improvements
1,147
727
420
1,127
673
454
$
5,941
$
3,810
$
2,131
$
5,246
$
3,428
$
1,818
The depreciation expense for premises and equipment for 2007 was $434 million (2006 — $405
million; 2005 — $414 million).
NOTE 9 RBC DEXIA INVESTOR SERVICES JOINT VENTURE
RBC Dexia Investor Services
We operate
our institutional and investor services business (IIS) through our joint venture, RBC Dexia
Investor Services (RBC Dexia IS). During the year, RBC Dexia IS finalized the net assets
contribution requirement outlined in the joint venture agreement. As a result, it was determined
that we had contributed €27 million ($41 million) of net assets in excess of the amount required.
This excess was settled by RBC Dexia IS in cash and recognized by us as a reduction in our
investment in the joint venture.
Assets and liabilities representing our interest in RBC Dexia IS and our proportionate share
of its financial results before adjusting for related party transactions are presented in the
following tables:
For the year ended October 31, 2006, we did not report our proportionate share of RBC
Dexia IS results for our quarter ended January 31, 2006 as the joint venture was formed on
January 2, 2006, and we report its results on a one-month lag basis.
We provide certain services to RBC Dexia IS, which include administrative and technology support,
human resources, and credit and banking facilities to support its operations. RBC Dexia IS also
provides certain services to us, including custody and trusteeship, fund and investment
administration, transfer agency and investor services. These services and facilities are provided
by the respective parties in the normal course of operations on terms similar to those offered to
non-related parties. The amount of income earned and expenses incurred by RBC Dexia IS related to
transactions with RBC are as follows:
For the year ended October 31, 2006, we did not report the amounts
of income earned and expenses incurred by RBC Dexia IS related to transactions
with RBC for our quarter ended January 31, 2006 as the joint venture was
formed on January 2, 2006, and we report its results on a one-month lag basis.
Royal Bank of Canada: Annual Report 2007
Consolidated Financial Statements 137
Effective February 7, 2007, as discussed in Note 30, our previous three business segments were
reorganized into four business segments. This reorganization resulted in the realignment of certain
reporting units. Accordingly, we have reallocated our goodwill to the new
reporting units using the relative fair value approach. The following table discloses the changes
in goodwill during 2006 and 2007, including the reallocation of goodwill to the new reporting units:
Other adjustments in 2006 primarily include the impact of foreign exchange translations on
foreign currency-denominated goodwill, changes in goodwill related to our IIS business with
RBC Dexia IS (refer to Note 9), and the transfer of $6 million of housing tax credit
syndication business goodwill from RBC U.S. and International Personal and Business to RBC
Capital Markets. Refer to Note 30.
(2)
During 2006, we adjusted the foreign exchange translation of certain foreign
currency-denominated goodwill of RBC Canadian Personal and Business to better align with the
nature of the net assets supporting the segment. This resulted in an increase of $182 million
of goodwill for RBC Canadian Personal and Business. A corresponding increase was made to
Unrealized foreign currency translation adjustments on our Consolidated Statements of Changes
in Shareholders’ Equity.
(3)
Other adjustments in the first quarter of 2007 primarily include the impact of foreign exchange
translations on foreign currency-denominated goodwill.
As a result of the application of the relative fair value approach for the business
reorganization, goodwill as at January 31, 2007 has been reallocated as follows:
Other adjustments in the last three quarters of 2007 primarily include the impact of
foreign exchange translations on foreign currency-denominated goodwill.
We have also completed the annual assessment for goodwill impairment in all reporting units and
have determined that there was no goodwill impairment for the year ended October 31, 2007 (2006 —
nil; 2005 — nil).
Other intangibles
2007
2006
Gross carrying
Accumulated
Net carrying
Gross carrying
Accumulated
Net carrying
amount
amortization (1)
amount
amount
amortization (1)
amount
Core deposit
intangibles
$
376
$
(170
)
$
206
$
324
$
(163
)
$
161
Customer lists and
relationships
605
(200
)
405
625
(156
)
469
Mortgage servicing
rights
47
(30
)
17
44
(32
)
12
$
1,028
$
(400
)
$
628
$
993
$
(351
)
$
642
(1)
Total amortization expense for 2007 was $96 million (2006 — $76 million; 2005 — $50
million).
The projected amortization of Other intangibles for each of the years ending October 31, 2008 to
October 31, 2012 is approximately $86 million. There were no writedowns of intangible assets due to
impairment for the year ended October 31, 2007 (2006 — nil; 2005 — nil).
Royal Bank of Canada: Annual Report 2007
138 Consolidated Financial Statements
In
December 2006, we completed the acquisition of Atlanta, Georgia-based Flag Financial Corporation
(Flag) and its subsidiary, Flag Bank,
and in March 2007, we completed the acquisition of 39 branches of AmSouth Bank in Alabama (AmSouth
branches). Details of these acquisitions are as follows:
Purchase consideration in the currency of the transaction
Cash payment of US$435
Cash payment of US$343
Purchase consideration in Canadian dollar equivalent
$
498
$
405
Fair value of tangible assets acquired
$
1,912
$
2,368
Fair value of liabilities assumed
(1,870
)
(2,369
)
Fair value of identifiable net assets acquired (net liabilities assumed)
42
(1
)
Core deposit intangibles and other intangibles (2), (3)
50
83
Goodwill
406
323
Total purchase consideration
$
498
$
405
(1)
The purchase price allocation for the AmSouth branches is preliminary; it will be finalized
once the valuations of certain assets and liabilities are completed.
(2)
Core deposit intangibles are amortized on a straight-line basis over an estimated average
useful life of seven years.
(3)
Included in the acquisition of Flag was $7 million of Other intangibles ($nil for AmSouth
branches) which relates to non-compete agreements and are amortized over the term of the
agreements for a maximum of three years.
n.a.
not applicable
Other acquisitions
Capital Markets
During 2007, we completed three acquisitions for a total cost of US$150 million (C$170 million),
which were paid in cash: (i) Ohio-based Seasongood & Mayer, LLC, a public finance firm and leading
underwriter of municipal debt, and its wholly owned subsidiary, Seasongood Asset Management, an
investment advisor to public funds clients, (ii) the broker-dealer business and certain other
assets of the Carlin Financial Group, a New York-based broker-dealer, and (iii) Colorado-based
Daniels & Associates, L.P., an M&A advisory firm specializing in the communications, media and
entertainment, and technology sectors. These acquisitions are not material to Capital Markets and
resulted in goodwill of $160 million.
Wealth Management
On May 18, 2007, we completed the acquisition of New Jersey-based J.B. Hanauer & Co., a privately
held financial services firm which specializes in retail fixed income and wealth management
services, for US$42 million (C$45 million) in cash. The acquisition is not material to Wealth
Management and resulted in goodwill of $18 million.
Pending acquisitions
U.S. & International Banking
On April17, 2007, we announced our intention to acquire a 50% interest in
Fidelity Merchant Bank & Trust Limited, the Bahamas-based wholly
owned subsidiary of Fidelity Bank & Trust International Limited
to form a joint venture to be called Royal Fidelity Merchant Bank
& Trust Limited which will provide certain corporate finance and
advisory, investment management, stock brokerage, share registrar and
transfer agency, pension and mutual fund administration services.
This transaction is expected to close in the first quarter of 2008.
On September 6, 2007, RBC Centura Banks, Inc. announced the signing of a definitive merger
agreement pursuant to which RBC Centura Banks, Inc. agreed to acquire Birmingham-based Alabama
National BanCorporation (ANB), parent of 10 subsidiary banks and other affiliated businesses in
Alabama, Florida and Georgia. Under the agreement, shareholders of ANB will receive US$80 per share
payable in cash, RBC common shares or a combination of each, valuing the deal at approximately
US$1.6 billion (C$1.5 billion as at October 31, 2007), with the total transaction consideration
consisting of one-half cash and one-half RBC common shares. The acquisition is subject to customary
closing conditions, including approval by U.S. and Canadian regulators and by ANB shareholders. The
transaction is expected to close in early calendar year 2008.
On October 2, 2007, we and the RBTT Financial Group (RBTT) announced an agreement to combine
our Caribbean retail banking operations with RBTT’s through the acquisition of RBTT for a total
purchase price of TT$13.8 billion (C$2 billion as at October 31, 2007). RBTT is a Caribbean-owned
banking and financial services group which offers a complete range of banking and financial
intermediate services to customers in Trinidad and Tobago and the Caribbean. Under the agreement,
RBTT shareholders will receive per share consideration of TT$40 payable 60% in cash and 40% in RBC
common shares. The number of RBC common shares to be received by RBTT shareholders is subject to a
plus/minus 10% “collar” based on our share price of US$54.42. The acquisition is subject to
customary closing conditions, including approval by the Trinidad and
Tobago and Canadian and other regulators
and RBTT shareholders. This transaction is expected to close by the middle of calendar year 2008.
Royal Bank of Canada: Annual Report 2007
Consolidated Financial Statements 139
NOTE 11 SIGNIFICANT ACQUISITIONS AND DISPOSITIONS (continued)
2006
Acquisitions
Wealth
Management
In November 2005, we completed the acquisition of operations of Abacus Financial Services Group
Limited (Abacus) in London, Jersey, Guernsey, Edinburgh and Cheltenham. Abacus is based in Jersey,
Channel Islands, and provides wealth management and fiduciary
services to private and corporate clients primarily in the British Isles and Continental Europe.
In October 2006, we completed the acquisition of American Guaranty & Trust (AG&T) which is
based in Wilmington, Delaware, and offers complete personal trust and custody services through a
unique strategic partnership with professional advisors.
Purchase consideration in the currency of the transaction
Cash payment of Ł$105 (2)
Cash payment of US$12.5
Purchase consideration in Canadian dollar equivalent
$
213
$
14
Fair value of tangible assets acquired
$
43
$
3
Fair value of liabilities assumed
(23)
—
Fair value of identifiable net tangible assets acquired
20
3
Customer lists and relationships (3)
116
2
Goodwill
77
9
Total purchase consideration
$
213
$
14
(1)
These acquisitions, which were previously included in the
operations of RBC U.S. and
International Personal and Business segment, are included in the Wealth Management business
segment effective February 2, 2007 upon reorganization of our business segments. Refer to Note
30.
(2)
Includes Ł20 million placed in an escrow account for future payments of claims as agreed to
in the purchase agreement. Amounts remaining in the escrow account will be released to the
vendors over a three-year period after completion of the acquisition.
(3)
Customer lists and relationships are amortized on a straight-line basis over an estimated
average useful life of 15 years.
Dispositions
On September 2,2005, we completed the sale of RBC Mortgage
Company (RBC Mortgage) to New Century Mortgage Corporation
and Home123 Corporation (Home123), pursuant to which Home123
acquired certain assets of RBC Mortgage including its branches, and
hired substantially all of its employees. RBC Mortgage disposed of
substantially all of its remaining assets and obligations
by the end of
2006 and the residual balances of RBC Mortgage in 2007 are immaterial. These residual balances are no longer recorded separately in
our Consolidated Financial Statements for 2007 and changes in
the amounts are now reported in Corporate Support. Prior to 2007,
the results of RBC Mortgage are presented separately as discontinued
operations.
NOTE 12 OTHER ASSETS
2007
2006
Receivable from brokers, dealers and clients
$
4,048
$
3,172
Accrued interest receivable
2,608
2,229
Investment in associated corporations and limited partnerships
1,420
1,614
Insurance-related assets (1)
827
702
Net future income tax asset (refer to Note 24)
1,251
1,104
Prepaid
pension benefit cost (2) (refer to Note 20)
590
761
Cheques and other items in transit
—
489
Other
7,109
5,346
$
17,853
$
15,417
(1)
Insurance-related assets include policy loan balances, premiums outstanding, amounts due from other insurers in respect of reinsurance contracts and pooling arrangements, and
deferred acquisition costs.
(2)
Prepaid pension benefit cost represents the cumulative excess of pension fund contributions over pension benefit expense.
Royal Bank of Canada: Annual Report 2007
140 Consolidated Financial Statements
The following table details our deposit liabilities:
2007
2006
Demand (1)
Notice (2)
Term (3)
Total
Total
Personal
$
14,022
$
36,537
$
65,998
$
116,557
$
114,040
Business and
government (4), (5)
64,934
16,930
138,022
219,886
189,140
Bank
4,135
221
24,406
28,762
40,343
$
83,091
$
53,688
$
228,426
$
365,205
$
343,523
Non-interest-bearing
Canada
$
28,254
$
19,088
United States
2,285
2,293
Other International
1,693
1,241
Interest-bearing
Canada (4), (5)
155,190
174,170
United States
41,514
50,123
Other International
136,269
96,608
$
365,205
$
343,523
(1)
Deposits payable on demand include all deposits for which we do not have the right to notice of
withdrawal. These deposits are primarily chequing accounts.
(2)
Deposits payable after notice include all deposits for which we can legally require notice of
withdrawal. These deposits are primarily savings accounts.
(3)
Term deposits include deposits payable on a fixed date. These deposits include term deposits,
guaranteed investment certificates and similar instruments. At October 31, 2007, the balance
of term deposits also includes senior deposit notes we have issued to provide long-term
funding of $51.5 billion (2006-$33.4 billion).
(4)
The senior deposit note of $900 million issued to Trust II (refer to Note 17) is included in
Business and government deposits. This senior deposit note bears interest at an annual rate of
5.812% and will mature on December 31, 2053. The note is redeemable at our option, in whole or
in part, on and after December 31, 2008, subject to the approval of the OSFI. It may be
redeemed earlier, at our option in certain specified circumstances, subject to the approval of
the OSFI. Each $1,000 of the note principal is convertible at any time into 40 of our
Non-cumulative redeemable First Preferred Shares Series U at the option of Trust II. Trust II
will exercise this conversion right in circumstances in which holders of RBC Trust Capital
Securities Series 2013 (RBC TruCS 2013) exercise their holder exchange right. Refer to Note 17
for more information on RBC TruCS 2013.
(5)
Business and government deposits also include a senior deposit note of $999.8 million issued
to RBC Subordinated Notes Trust (Trust III) (refer to Note 17). This senior deposit note bears
interest at an annual rate of 4.72% and will mature on April 30,2017. Subject to the OSFI’s
approval, the note is redeemable at our option, in whole or in part, on or after April 30,2012, at the Redemption Price and may also be redeemed earlier at our option at the Early
Redemption Price. The Redemption Price is an amount equal to $1,000 plus the unpaid
distributions to the redemption date. The Early Redemption Price is an amount equal to the
greater of (i) the Redemption Price, and (ii) the price calculated to provide an annual yield,
equal to the yield on Government of Canada bonds from the redemption date to April 30, 2012,
plus 11 basis points.
The contractual maturities of the term deposits are as follows:
Term deposits (1)
2007
Within 1 year
$
171,929
1 to 2 years
17,484
2 to 3 years
15,290
3 to 4 years
9,501
4 to 5 years
8,552
Over 5 years
5,670
Total
$
228,426
(1)
The aggregate amount of term deposits in denominations of $100,000 or more as at
October 31, 2007 was $186 billion.
The following table presents the average deposit balances and average rates of interest paid during
2007 and 2006:
Average deposit balances and rates
Average balances
Average rates
2007
2006
2007
2006
Canada
$
190,754
$
183,085
2.97
%
2.74
%
United States
54,812
48,272
4.68
4.18
Other International
122,910
91,942
4.50
3.99
$
368,476
$
323,299
3.74
%
3.31
%
Royal Bank of Canada: Annual Report 2007
Consolidated Financial Statements 141
The net decrease in Insurance claims and policy benefit liabilities over the prior year
comprised: (i) the favourable impact of the stronger Canadian dollar on U.S. dollar-denominated
liabilities, (ii) a net decrease in reinsurance liabilities reflecting claim payments related to
hurricanes Katrina, Rita and Wilma, and (iii) the net increase in life and health and property and
casualty liabilities attributable to business growth and market movements on assets backing life and
health liabilities.
Furthermore, the review of various actuarial assumptions and completion of certain actuarial
experience studies resulted in a net decrease of $57 million life and $32 million health insurance
liabilities. This was predominantly driven by the impact of ongoing experience studies, refinements to
cash flow models and methods, investment portfolio changes and
updated interest rate assumptions, and
includes a cumulative valuation adjustment of $92 million relating to prior periods.
The changes in the insurance claims and policy benefit liabilities are included in the
Insurance policyholder benefits, claims and acquisition expense in our Consolidated Statement of
Income in the period in which the estimates changed.
Reinsurance
In the ordinary course of business, our insurance operations reinsure risks to other insurance and
reinsurance companies in order to provide greater diversification, limit loss exposure to large
risks, and provide additional capacity for future growth. These ceding reinsurance arrangements do
not relieve our insurance subsidiaries from their direct obligation to the insureds. We evaluate
the financial condition of the reinsurers and monitor our concentrations of credit risks to
minimize our exposure to losses from reinsurer insolvency.
Reinsurance recoverables related to property and casualty insurance business, which are
included in Other assets, include amounts related to paid benefits and unpaid claims. Reinsurance
recoverables related to life insurance business are included in Insurance claims and policy benefit
liabilities to offset the related liabilities.
Reinsurance amounts (ceded premiums) included in Non-interest income for the years ended
October 31 are shown in the table below:
Net premiums
2007
2006
2005
Gross premiums
$
3,445
$
3,405
$
3,329
Ceded premiums
(852
)
(810
)
(765
)
$
2,593
$
2,595
$
2,564
NOTE 15 OTHER LIABILITIES
2007
2006
Short-term borrowings of subsidiaries
$
3,784
$
3,929
Payable to brokers, dealers and clients
3,941
3,382
Accrued interest payable
2,908
2,556
Accrued pension and other post-employment benefit expense (1) (refer to Note 20)
1,266
1,250
Insurance-related liabilities
408
491
Dividends payable
661
526
Payroll and related compensation
3,960
3,551
Trade payables and related accounts
1,854
709
Taxes payable
1,078
78
Other
8,623
6,177
$
28,483
$
22,649
(1)
Accrued pension and other post-employment benefit expense represents the cumulative excess
of pension and other post-employment benefit expense over pension and other post-employment fund contributions.
Royal Bank of Canada: Annual Report 2007
142 Consolidated Financial Statements
The debentures are unsecured obligations and are subordinated in right of payment to the claims of
depositors and certain other creditors. All redemptions, cancellations and exchanges of
subordinated debentures are subject to the consent and approval of the OSFI. All subordinated
debentures are redeemable at our option. As a result of adopting the new financial instruments
accounting standards effective
November 1, 2006, Subordinated debentures are now presented on our Consolidated Balance Sheets net
of deferred financing costs. Prior to November 1, 2006, deferred financing costs were recognized in
Other assets. The prior period comparative amounts have not been restated. The amounts presented
below are net of our holdings in these securities which have not been cancelled and are still
outstanding.
The terms and conditions of the debentures are as follows:
(1)
Redeemed on the earliest par value redemption date at par value.
(2)
Redeemable at any time prior to the earliest par value redemption date at the greater of (i)
the fair value of the subordinated debentures based on the yield on Government of Canada bonds
plus 18 basis points and (ii) par value, and thereafter at any time at par value.
(3)
Interest at stated interest rate until earliest par value redemption date, and thereafter
at a rate of 1.00% above the 90-day Bankers’ Acceptance rate.
(4)
Redeemable at any time prior to the earliest par value redemption date at the greater of (i)
the fair value of the subordinated debentures based on the yield on Government of Canada bonds
plus 8 basis points and (ii) par value, and thereafter at any time at par value.
(5)
Redeemable at any time prior to the earliest par value redemption date at the greater of (i)
the fair value of the subordinated debentures based on the yield on Government of Canada bonds
plus 9 basis points and (ii) par value, and thereafter at any time at par value.
(6)
Redeemable at any time prior to the earliest par value redemption date at the greater of (i)
the fair value of the subordinated debentures based on the yield on Government of Canada bonds
plus 12.5 basis points and (ii) par value, and thereafter at any time at par value.
(7)
Redeemable at any time prior to the earliest par value redemption date at the greater of (i)
the fair value of the subordinated debentures based on the yield on Government of Canada bonds
plus 22 basis points and (ii) par value, and thereafter at any time at par value.
(8)
Redeemable at any time prior to the earliest par value redemption date at the greater of (i)
the fair value of the subordinated debentures based on the yield on Government of Canada bonds
plus 14 basis points and (ii) par value, and thereafter at any time at par value.
Fixed interest rate at 2.86% per annum, payable semi-annually.
(11)
Redeemable on any interest payment date at par value.
(12)
Interest at a rate of 40 basis points above the 30-day Bankers’ Acceptance rate.
(13)
Interest at a rate of 25 basis points above the U.S. dollar 3-month LIMEAN. In the event of a
reduction of the annual dividend we declare on our common shares, the interest payable on the
debentures is reduced pro rata to the dividend reduction and the interest reduction is payable
with the proceeds from the sale of newly issued common shares.
(14)
Redeemable on June 18, 2009, or every fifth anniversary of such date at par value. Redeemable
on any other date at the greater of par and the yield on a non-callable Government of Canada
bond plus
21 basis points if redeemed prior to June 18, 2014, or 43 basis points if redeemed at any time
after June 18, 2014.
(15)
Interest at a rate of 5.95% until earliest par value redemption date and every 5 years
thereafter at the 5-year Government of Canada yield plus 172 basis points.
Maturity schedule
The aggregate maturities of subordinated debentures, based on the maturity dates under the terms
of issue, are as follows:
We issue innovative capital instruments, RBC Trust Capital Securities (TruCS) and RBC Trust
Subordinated Notes (TSNs), through three SPEs: RBC Capital Trust (Trust), RBC Capital Trust II
(Trust II) and RBC Subordinated Notes Trust (Trust III).
On
April 30, 2007, we issued $1 billion innovative subordinated
debentures, TSNs—Series A,
through Trust III. Trust III is a closed-end trust established under the laws of the Province of
Ontario. The issue was priced at $99.982 with a yield to April 30, 2012 of 4.584%. The proceeds were
used to purchase a senior deposit note from us. Trust III is a VIE under AcG-15. We do not
consolidate Trust III as we are not its Primary Beneficiary (refer to
Note 6); therefore, the TSNs—Series A issued by Trust III are not reported on our Consolidated Balance Sheet but the senior
deposit note issued by us to Trust III is reported as a Business and government deposit liability
(refer to Note 13).
In prior years, we issued non-voting RBC Trust Capital Securities Series 2010, 2011 and 2015
(RBC TruCS 2010, 2011 and 2015) through our consolidated subsidiary RBC Capital Trust, a closed-end
trust established under the laws of the Province of Ontario. RBC TruCS 2010 and 2011 are classified
as Trust capital securities. The proceeds of the RBC TruCS 2010 and 2011 were used to fund the
Trust’s acquisition of trust assets. Holders of RBC TruCS 2010 and 2011 are eligible to receive
semi-annual non-cumulative fixed cash distributions.
Unlike the RBC TruCS 2010 and 2011, the holders of RBC TruCS 2015 do not have any conversion
rights or any other redemption rights.
As a result, upon consolidation of the Trust, RBC TruCS 2015 are classified as Non-controlling
interest in subsidiaries (refer to Note 19). Holders of RBC TruCS 2015 are eligible to receive
semi-annual non-cumulative fixed cash distributions until December 31, 2015 and a floating-rate cash
distribution thereafter.
Trust II, an open-end trust, has issued non-voting RBC TruCS 2013, the proceeds of which were
used to purchase a senior deposit note from us. Trust II is a VIE under AcG-15 (refer to Note 6).
We do not consolidate Trust II as we are not the Primary Beneficiary; therefore, the RBC TruCS 2013
issued by Trust II are not reported on our Consolidated Balance Sheets, but the senior deposit note
is reported in Deposits (refer to Note 13). Holders of RBC TruCS 2013 are eligible to receive
semi-annual non-cumulative fixed cash distributions.
No cash distributions will be payable by the trusts on TruCS if we fail to declare regular
dividends (i) on our preferred shares, or (ii) on our common shares if no preferred shares are then
outstanding. In this case, the net distributable funds of the trusts will be distributed to us as
holders of residual interest in the trusts. Should the trusts fail to pay the semi-annual
distributions in full, we will not declare dividends of any kind on any of our preferred or common
shares for a specified period of time.
The table below presents the significant terms and conditions of TruCS and TSNs as at October31, 2007 and 2006:
Redemption date
Conversion date
2007
2006
Annual
At the option of
At the option of
Principal
Principal
Issuer
Issuance date
Distribution dates
yield
the issuer
the holder
amount
amount
RBC Capital Trust (1), (2), (3), (4), (5), (6), (7)
The significant terms and conditions of the TruCS and TSNs are as follows:
(1)
Subject to the approval of the OSFI, the Trust may, in whole (but not in part), on the
Redemption date specified above, and on any Distribution date thereafter, redeem the RBC TruCS
2010, 2011 and 2015, without the consent of the holders.
(2)
Subject to the approval of the OSFI, upon occurrence of a special event as defined, prior to
the Redemption date specified above, the trusts may redeem all, but not part of, RBC TruCS
2010, 2011, 2013 or 2015 without the consent of the holders.
(3)
Issuer Redemption Price: The RBC TruCS 2010 and 2011 may be redeemed for cash equivalent to
(i) the Early Redemption Price if the redemption occurs earlier than six months prior to the
conversion date specified above or (ii) the Redemption Price if the redemption occurs on or
after the date that is six months prior to the conversion date as indicated above. The RBC
TruCS 2013 and 2015 may be redeemed for cash equivalent to (i) the Early Redemption Price if
the redemption occurs prior to December 31, 2013 and 2015,
respectively, or (ii) the Redemption
Price if the redemption occurs on or after December 31, 2013 and 2015, respectively. The TSNs
— Series A may be redeemed, in whole or in part, subject to
the approval of the OSFI, for cash
equivalent to (i) the Early Redemption Price if the notes are
redeemed prior to April 30, 2012, or
(ii) the Redemption Price if the notes are redeemed on or after
April 30, 2012. Redemption Price
refers to an amount equal to $1,000 plus the unpaid distributions to the Redemption date.
Early Redemption Price refers to an amount equal to the greater of (i) the Redemption Price
and (ii) the price calculated to provide an annual yield, equal to the yield on a Government
of Canada bond issued on the Redemption date with a maturity date of
June 30, 2010 and 2011,
plus 33 basis points and 40 basis points, for RBC TruCS 2010 and 2011, respectively, and a
maturity date of December 31, 2013 and 2015, plus 23 basis points and 19.5 basis points, for
RBC TruCS 2013 and 2015, respectively; and a maturity date of
April 30, 2012, plus 11 basis points for TSNs—Series A.
(4)
Automatic Exchange Event: Without the consent of the holders,
each RBC TruCS 2010, 2011, 2013 and
2015 will be exchanged automatically for 40 of our non-cumulative redeemable First Preferred
Shares Series Q, R, T and Z, respectively, and each TSN — Series A will be exchanged
automatically for an equal principal amount of Bank Series 10 Subordinated Notes upon
occurrence of any one of the following events: (i) proceedings are commenced for our
winding-up; (ii) the OSFI takes control of us; (iii) we have Tier 1 capital ratio of less than
5% or Total capital ratio of less than 8%; or (iv) the OSFI has directed us to increase our
capital or provide additional liquidity and we elect such automatic exchange or we fail to
comply with such direction. The First Preferred Shares Series T and Z pay semi-annual
non-cumulative cash dividends and Series T is convertible at the
option of the holder into a
variable number of common shares.
(5)
From time to time, we purchase some of the innovative capital instruments and hold them on a
temporary basis. As at October 31, 2007, we held $nil of
RBC TruCS 2011 (2006—$17 million) and
$6 million of RBC TruCS 2015 (2006 — $12 million) as treasury holdings which were deducted
from regulatory capital.
(6)
Regulatory capital: According to the OSFI guidelines, innovative capital instruments can
comprise up to 15% of net Tier 1 capital with an additional 5% eligible for Tier 2B capital.
Any amount in excess of the 20% limitation is not recognized for regulatory capital purposes.
TSN — Series A qualifies as Tier 2B capital. As at October 31, 2007, $3,494
million (2006 — $3,222 million) represents Tier 1 capital, $1,027 million
(2006 — $249 million) represents Tier
2B capital and $6 million (2006 — $29 million) of our treasury holdings of innovative capital
is deducted for regulatory capital purposes. As at October 31, 2007, none of our innovative
capital instruments exceeds the OSFI’s limit of 20% (2006 — nil).
Royal Bank of Canada: Annual Report 2007
144 Consolidated Financial Statements
Holder Exchange Right: Holders of RBC TruCS 2010 and 2011 may exchange, on any Distribution
date on or after the conversion date specified above, RBC TruCS 2010 and 2011 for 40
non-cumulative redeemable Bank First Preferred Shares, Series Q and Series R, respectively.
Holders of RBC TruCS 2013 may, at any time, exchange all or part of their holdings for 40
non-cumulative redeemable First Preferred Shares Series U, for each RBC TruCS 2013 held. The
First Preferred Shares Series Q, R and U pay semi-annual non-cumulative cash dividends as and
when declared by our Board of Directors and are convertible at the option of the holder into a
variable number of common shares. Holders of RBC TruCS 2015 and TSNs — Series A do not have
similar exchange rights.
(8)
The non-cumulative cash distribution on the RBC TruCS 2015 will be 4.87% paid semi-annually
until December 31, 2015, and at one half of the sum of 180-day
Bankers’ Acceptance rate plus
1.5%, thereafter.
(9)
Subject to the approval of the OSFI, Trust II may, in whole or in part, on the Redemption
date specified above, and on any Distribution date thereafter, redeem any outstanding RBC
TruCS 2013, without the consent of the holders.
(10)
The cash distribution on the TSNs — Series A will
be 4.58% paid semi annually until April30, 2012, and at 90-day Bankers’ Acceptance rate plus 1% thereafter paid quarterly until
their maturity on April 30, 2017.
(11)
We will guarantee the payment of principal, interest, the redemption price, if any, and any
other amounts of the TSNs — Bankers’ Series A when they become due and payable, whether at stated
maturity, call for redemption, Automatic Exchange or otherwise according to the terms of the
Bank Subordinated Guarantee and the Trust Indenture.
NOTE 18 PREFERRED SHARE LIABILITIES AND SHARE CAPITAL
Authorized share capital
Preferred
— An unlimited number of First Preferred Shares and Second Preferred Shares without
nominal or par value, issuable in series; the aggregate consideration for which all the First
Preferred Shares and all the Second Preferred Shares that may be issued may not exceed $20 billion
and $5 billion, respectively.
Common
— An unlimited number of shares without nominal or par value may be issued.
Issued and outstanding shares
2007
2006
2005
Number
Dividends
Number
Dividends
Number
Dividends
of shares
declared
of shares
declared
of shares
declared
(000s)
Amount
per share
(000s)
Amount
per share
(000s)
Amount
per share
Preferred share liabilities
First preferred
Non-cumulative Series N
11,916
$
298
$
1.18
12,000
$
300
$
1.18
12,000
$
300
$
1.18
Treasury
shares — sales
152
4
—
—
—
—
Treasury shares — purchases
(68
)
(2
)
(84
)
(2
)
—
—
Preferred share liabilities, net of treasury holdings
12,000
$
300
11,916
$
298
12,000
$
300
Preferred shares
First preferred
Non-cumulative
Series O (1)
—
$
—
$
—
6,000
$
150
$
1.38
6,000
$
150
$
1.38
Non-cumulative Series S (2)
—
—
—
—
—
1.33
10,000
250
1.53
Non-cumulative Series W (3)
12,000
300
1.23
12,000
300
1.23
12,000
300
.99
Non-cumulative Series AA (4)
12,000
300
1.11
12,000
300
.71
—
—
—
Non-cumulative Series AB (5)
12,000
300
1.18
12,000
300
.41
—
—
—
Non-cumulative Series AC (6)
8,000
200
1.22
—
—
—
—
—
—
Non-cumulative Series AD (7)
10,000
250
1.06
—
—
—
—
—
—
Non-cumulative Series AE (8)
10,000
250
.95
—
—
—
—
—
—
Non-cumulative Series AF (9)
8,000
200
.77
—
—
—
—
—
—
Non-cumulative Series AG (10)
10,000
250
.65
—
—
—
—
—
—
$
2,050
$
1,050
$
700
Common shares
Balance at beginning of year
1,280,890
$
7,196
1,293,502
$
7,170
1,289,496
$
6,988
Issued under the stock option plan (11)
7,215
170
5,617
127
9,917
214
Purchased for cancellation
(11,845
)
(66
)
(18,229
)
(101
)
(5,911
)
(32
)
Balance at end of year
1,276,260
$
7,300
$
1.82
1,280,890
$
7,196
$
1.44
1,293,502
$
7,170
$
1.18
Treasury shares — Preferred shares
Balance at beginning of year
(94
)
$
(2
)
(91
)
$
(2
)
—
$
—
Sales
1,345
33
2,082
51
—
—
Purchases
(1,500
)
(37
)
(2,085
)
(51
)
(91
)
(2
)
Balance at end of year
(249
)
$
(6
)
(94
)
$
(2
)
(91
)
$
(2
)
Treasury shares — Common shares
Balance at beginning of year
(5,486
)
$
(180
)
(7,053
)
$
(216
)
(9,726
)
$
(294
)
Sales
4,756
175
5,097
193
5,904
179
Purchases
(1,714
)
(96
)
(3,530
)
(157
)
(1,326
)
(47
)
Initial
adoption of AcG-15
—
—
—
—
(1,905
)
(54
)
Balance at end of year
(2,444
)
$
(101
)
(5,486
)
$
(180
)
(7,053
)
$
(216
)
(1)
On November 24, 2006, we redeemed Non-cumulative First Preferred Shares Series O. The
excess of the redemption price over carrying value of $3 million was charged to retained
earnings in preferred share dividends.
(2)
On October 6, 2006, we redeemed Non-cumulative First Preferred Shares Series S. The excess
of the redemption price over carrying value of $10 million was charged to retained earnings
in preferred share dividends.
(3)
On January 31, 2005, we issued 12 million Non-cumulative First Preferred Shares Series W at $25
per share.
(4)
On April 4, 2006, we issued 12 million Non-cumulative First
Preferred Shares Series AA at $25
per share.
(5)
On July 20, 2006, we issued 12 million Non-cumulative First Preferred
Shares Series AB at $25
per share.
(6)
On November 1, 2006, we issued 8 million Non-cumulative First Preferred Shares Series AC at $25
per share.
(7)
On December 13, 2006, we issued 10 million Non-cumulative First Preferred Shares Series AD at
$25 per share.
(8)
On January 19, 2007, we issued 10 million Non-cumulative First Preferred Shares Series AE at $25
per share.
(9)
On March 14, 2007, we issued 8 million Non-cumulative First
Preferred Shares Series AF at $25
per share.
(10)
On April 26, 2007, we issued 10 million Non-cumulative First Preferred Shares Series AG at $25
per share.
(11)
Includes the exercise of stock options from tandem stock appreciation rights (SARs)
awards, resulting in a reversal of the accrued liability, net of related income taxes, of
$10 million (2006 — $8 million), and from renounced tandem SARs, net of related income
taxes, of $6 million (2006 — $2 million).
Royal Bank of Canada: Annual Report 2007
Consolidated Financial Statements 145
Non-cumulative preferential dividends on Series N, W,
AA, AB, AC, AD, AE, AF and AG are
payable quarterly, as and when declared by the Board of Directors, on or about the 24th day of
February, May, August and November.
(2)
The redemption price represents the price as at October 31, 2007 or the contractual redemption
price, whichever is applicable. Subject to the consent of the OSFI and the requirements of the
Act, we may, on or after the dates specified above, redeem First Preferred Shares. These may
be redeemed for cash, in the case of Series N at a price per share of $26, if redeemed
during the 12 months commencing August 24, 2003, and decreasing by $.25 each 12-month period
thereafter to a price per share of $25 if redeemed on or after
August 24, 2007; and in the case
of Series W, at a price per share of $26, if redeemed during the 12 months commencing February24, 2010, and decreasing by $.25 each 12-month period thereafter to a price per share of $25 if
redeemed on or after February 24, 2014; and in the case of Series AA, at a price per share of
$26, if redeemed during the 12 months commencing May 24, 2011, and decreasing by $.25 each
12-month period thereafter to a price per share of $25 if redeemed on
or after May 24, 2015; and
in the case of Series AB, at a price per share of $26, if
redeemed during the 12 months
commencing August 24, 2011, and decreasing by $.25 each 12-month period thereafter to a price per
share of $25 if redeemed on or after August 24, 2015; and in the case of Series AC, at a price
per share of $26, if redeemed during the 12 months commencing
November 24, 2011, and decreasing by $.25 each 12-month period thereafter to a price per share of $25 if
redeemed on or after November 24, 2015; and in the case of Series AD, at a price per share of
$26, if redeemed during the 12 months commencing February 24, 2012, and decreasing by $.25
each 12-month period thereafter to a price per share of $25 if redeemed on or after February24, 2016; and in the case of Series AE, at a price per share of
$26, if redeemed during the 12
months commencing February 24, 2012, and decreasing by $.25 each 12-month period thereafter to a price per
share of $25 if redeemed on or after February 24, 2016; and in the case of Series AF, at a price
per share of $26, if redeemed during the 12 months commencing May 24, 2012, and decreasing by $.25
each 12-month period thereafter to a price per share of $25 if redeemed on or after May 24, 2016;
and in the case of Series AG, at a price per share of $26, if redeemed
during the 12 months commencing
May 24, 2012, and decreasing by $.25 each 12-month period thereafter to a price per share of $25
if redeemed on or after May 24, 2016.
(3)
Subject to the consent of the OSFI and the requirements of
the Act, we may purchase the First
Preferred Shares Series N, W, AA, AB, AC, AD, AE, AF and AG for cancellation at the lowest
price or prices at which, in the opinion of the Board of Directors, such shares are
obtainable.
(4)
Subject to the approval of the Toronto Stock Exchange, we may, on or after the dates
specified above, convert First Preferred Shares Series N and W into our common shares. First
Preferred Shares may be converted into that number of common shares
determined by dividing the
then-applicable redemption price by the greater of $2.50 and 95% of the weighted average
trading price of common shares at such time.
(5)
Subject to our right to redeem or to find substitute purchasers, the holder may, on or after
the dates specified above, convert First Preferred Shares into our common shares. Series N may
be converted, quarterly, into that number of common shares determined
by dividing the
then-applicable redemption price by the greater of $2.50 and 95% of the weighted average
trading price of common shares at such time.
Restrictions on the payment of dividends
We are prohibited by the Act from declaring any dividends on our preferred or common shares when we
are, or would be placed as a result of the declaration, in contravention of the capital adequacy
and liquidity regulations or any regulatory directives issued under the Act. We may not pay
dividends on our common shares at any time unless all dividends to which preferred shareholders are
then entitled have been declared and paid or set apart for payment.
In addition, we may not declare or pay a dividend without the approval of the OSFI if, on the
day the dividend is declared, the total of all dividends in that year would exceed the aggregate of
our net income up to that day and of our retained net income for the preceding two years.
We have agreed that if RBC Capital Trust or RBC Capital Trust II fail to pay any required
distribution on the trust capital securities in full, we will not declare dividends of any kind on
any of our preferred or common shares. Refer to Note 17.
Currently, these limitations do not restrict the payment of dividends on our preferred or
common shares.
We have also
agreed that if, on any day we report financial results for a quarter, (i) we
report a cumulative consolidated net loss for the immediately
preceding four quarters; and (ii) during the immediately preceding quarter we fail to
declare any cash dividends on all of our outstanding preferred and common shares, we may defer
payments of interest on the Series 2014-1 Reset Subordinated Notes (matures on June 18, 2103).
During any period while interest is being deferred, (i) interest will accrue on these notes but will
not compound; (ii) we may not declare or pay dividends (except by way of stock dividend) on, or
redeem or repurchase, any of our preferred or common shares; and (iii) we may not make any payment
of interest, principal or premium on any debt securities or indebtedness for borrowed money issued
or incurred by us that rank subordinate to these notes.
Regulatory capital
We are subject to the regulatory capital requirements defined by the OSFI. Two measures of capital
strength established by the OSFI, based on standards issued by the Bank for International
Settlements, are risk-adjusted capital ratios and the assets-to-capital multiple.
The OSFI requires Canadian banks to maintain a minimum Tier 1 and Total capital ratio of 4%
and 8%, respectively. However, the OSFI has also formally established risk-based capital targets
for deposit-taking institutions in Canada. These targets are a Tier 1 capital ratio of
Royal
Bank of Canada: Annual Report 2007
146 Consolidated Financial Statements
7% and a Total capital ratio of 10%. At October 31, 2007, our Tier 1 and Total capital ratios were
9.4% and 11.5%, respectively (2006 — 9.6% and 11.9%, respectively).
As at October 31, 2007, our assets-to-capital multiple was 19.9 (2006 — 19.7), which remains
below the maximum ratio of 23 permitted by the OSFI.
Dividend reinvestment plan
Our dividend reinvestment plan (plan), which was announced on August 27, 2004, provides registered
common shareholders with a means to automatically reinvest the cash dividends paid on their common
shares in the purchase of additional common shares. The plan is only open to registered
shareholders residing in Canada or the United States.
Management has the flexibility to fund the plan through open market share purchases or
treasury issuances.
Shares available for future issuances
As at October 31, 2007, 36.6 million common shares are available for future issue relating to our
plan and potential exercise of stock options outstanding.
Normal Course Issuer Bid
Details of common shares repurchased under Normal Course Issuer Bids (NCIB) during 2007, 2006 and
2005 are given below.
The 2005 number of shares and average cost per share are pre-stock dividend.
NOTE 19 NON-CONTROLLING INTEREST IN SUBSIDIARIES
2007
2006
RBC Trust Capital Securities (TruCS) Series 2015
$
1,214
$
1,207
Consolidated VIEs
188
506
Others
81
62
$
1,483
$
1,775
We consolidate VIEs in which we are the Primary Beneficiary. These VIEs include structured
finance VIEs, investment funds, credit investment product VIEs and compensation vehicles as
described in Note 6.
We issued RBC TruCS 2015 in 2005 which are reported as Non-controlling interest in
subsidiaries upon consolidation as discussed in Note 17. As at October 31, 2007, $20 million (2006
— $19 million) of accrued interest net of $6 million (2006 — $12 million) of treasury holdings was
included in RBC Trust Capital Securities Series 2015.
Royal Bank of Canada: Annual Report 2007
Consolidated Financial Statements 147
NOTE 20 PENSIONS AND OTHER POST-EMPLOYMENT BENEFITS
We offer a number of defined benefit and defined contribution plans, which provide pension and
post-employment benefits to eligible employees. Our defined benefit pension plans provide benefits
based on years of service, contributions and average earnings at retirement. Our other
post-employment benefit plans include health, dental, disability and life insurance coverage.
During 2006, we changed our post-retirement benefit program in Canada. The changes reduced our
benefit obligations by $505 million.
We fund our registered defined benefit pension plans in accordance with actuarially determined
amounts required to satisfy employee benefit obligations under current pension regulations. For our
principal pension plans, the most recent actuarial valuation performed for funding purposes was
completed on January 1, 2007. The next actuarial valuation for funding purposes will be completed on January 1, 2008.
For 2007, total contributions to our pension and other post-employment benefit plans were $208
million and $57 million (2006 — $594 million and $58 million), respectively. For 2008, total
contributions to defined benefit pension plans and other post-employment benefit plans are expected
to be approximately $128 million and $55 million, respectively.
For financial reporting purposes, we measure our benefit obligations and pension plan assets
as at September 30 each year.
The following tables present financial information related to all of our material pension and
other post-employment plans worldwide, including executive retirement arrangements:
Plan assets, benefit obligation and funded status
Pension plans (1)
Other
post-employment plans (2)
2007
2006
2007
2006
Change in fair value of plan assets
Opening fair value of plan assets
$
6,407
$
5,719
$
41
$
29
Actual return on plan assets
638
445
4
3
Company contributions
146
518
56
59
Plan participant contributions
25
24
5
6
Benefits paid
(333
)
(323
)
(54
)
(56
)
Business acquisitions
—
21
—
—
Other
(34
)
2
—
—
Change in foreign currency exchange rate
(65
)
1
—
—
Closing fair value of plan assets
$
6,784
$
6,407
$
52
$
41
Change in benefit obligation
Opening benefit obligation
$
6,838
$
6,524
$
1,468
$
1,891
Service cost
178
173
19
26
Interest cost
362
345
75
77
Plan participant contributions
25
24
5
6
Actuarial (gain) loss
(115
)
38
3
38
Benefits paid
(333
)
(323
)
(54
)
(56
)
Plan amendments and curtailments
(9
)
24
—
(515
)
Business acquisitions
5
31
—
5
Other
(27
)
5
—
—
Change in foreign currency exchange rate
(78
)
(3
)
(12
)
(4
)
Closing benefit obligation
$
6,846
$
6,838
$
1,504
$
1,468
Funded status
Excess of benefit obligation over plan assets
$
(62
)
$
(431
)
$
(1,452
)
$
(1,427
)
Unrecognized net actuarial loss
488
963
564
598
Unrecognized transitional (asset) obligation
(10
)
(12
)
1
1
Unrecognized prior service cost
95
131
(307
)
(330
)
Contributions between September 30 and October 31
2
14
5
4
Prepaid asset (accrued liability) as at October 31
$
513
$
665
$
(1,189
)
$
(1,154
)
Amounts recognized in our Consolidated Balance Sheets consist of:
Other assets
$
590
$
761
$
—
$
—
Other liabilities
(77
)
(96
)
(1,189
)
(1,154
)
Net amount recognized as at October 31
$
513
$
665
$
(1,189
)
$
(1,154
)
Weighted average assumptions to calculate benefit obligation
Discount rate
5.60
%
5.25
%
5.62
%
5.26
%
Rate of increase in future compensation (3)
3.30
%
3.30
%
3.30
%
3.30
%
(1)
For pension plans with funding deficits, the benefit obligations and fair values of plan
assets totalled $5,850 million (2006—$6,156 million) and $5,687 million (2006-$5,665 million),
respectively.
(2)
For our other post-employment plans, the assumed health care cost trend rates for the next
year used to measure the expected cost of benefits covered by the post-employment health and
life plans were 7.2% for medical decreasing to an ultimate rate of 5.0% in 2016 and 4.5% for
dental.
(3)
The actual assumption for rate of increase in future compensation is an age-related scale.
Although the underlying assumption has not been changed, we have revised our presentation of
the disclosed equivalent single rate to be more consistent with the methodology used by other
Canadian financial institutions.
The following table presents our estimates of the benefit payments for defined benefit pension and
other post-employment plans:
Benefits payment projection
Other
post-employment
Pension plans
plans
2008
$
318
$
61
2009
349
69
2010
357
74
2011
365
77
2012
373
81
2013-2017
2,086
458
Royal Bank of Canada: Annual Report 2007
148 Consolidated Financial Statements
Composition of defined benefit pension plan assets
The defined benefit pension plan assets are primarily composed of equity and fixed income
securities. The equity securities include 1.5 million (2006 — 1.9 million) of our common shares
having a fair value of $84 million (2006-$94 million). Dividends amounting to
$2.6 million (2006 — $2.5 million) were received on our common shares held in the plan assets
during the year.
The following table presents the allocation of the plan assets by securities category:
Asset category
Actual
2007
2006
Equity securities
60
%
60
%
Debt securities
40
%
40
%
Total
100
%
100
%
Investment policy and strategies
Pension plan assets are invested prudently over the long term in order to meet pension obligations
at a reasonable cost. The asset mix policy takes into consideration a number of factors including
the following:
(i)
investment characteristics including expected returns, volatilities and
correlations between plan assets and plan liabilities;
(ii)
the plan’s tolerance for risk, which dictates the trade-off
between increased short-term volatility and enhanced long-term
expected returns;
(iii)
diversification of plan assets to minimize the risk of large losses;
(iv)
the liquidity of the portfolio relative to the anticipated cash flow
requirements of the plan; and
(v)
actuarial factors such as membership demographics and future salary growth rates.
Pension and other post-employment benefit expense
The following tables present the composition of our pension benefit and other post-employment
benefit expense:
Pension benefit expense
2007
2006
2005
Service cost
$
178
$
173
$
138
Interest cost
362
345
344
Expected return on plan assets
(411
)
(364
)
(328
)
Amortization of transitional asset
(2
)
(2
)
(2
)
Amortization of prior service cost
29
32
32
Amortization of actuarial loss (gain)
129
138
90
Other
7
3
3
Defined benefit pension expense
$
292
$
325
$
277
Defined contribution pension expense
74
65
63
Pension benefit expense
$
366
$
390
$
340
Weighted average assumptions to calculate pension benefit expense
Discount rate
5.25
%
5.25
%
6.25
%
Assumed long-term rate of return on plan assets
7.00
%
7.00
%
7.00
%
Rate of increase in future compensation
3.30
%
3.30
%
3.30
%
Other post-employment benefit expense
2007
2006
2005
Service cost
$
19
$
26
$
49
Interest cost
75
77
101
Expected return on plan assets
(3
)
(2
)
(2
)
Amortization of transitional obligation
—
3
17
Amortization of actuarial loss (gain)
36
31
30
Amortization of prior service cost
(23
)
(20
)
1
Curtailment gain
—
(8
)
(1
)
Other post-employment benefit expense
$
104
$
107
$
195
Weighted average assumptions to calculate other post-employment benefit expense
Discount rate
5.26
%
5.41
%
6.35
%
Rate of increase in future compensation (1)
3.30
%
3.30
%
3.30
%
(1)
The actual assumption for rate of increase in future compensation is an age-related
scale. Although the underlying assumption has not changed, we have revised our presentation of
the disclosed equivalent single rate to be more consistent with the methodology used by other
Canadian financial institutions.
Significant assumptions
Our methodologies to determine significant assumptions used in calculating the defined benefit
pension and other post-employment expense are as follows:
Overall expected long-term rate of return on assets
The assumed expected rate of return on assets
is determined by considering long-term expected returns on government bonds and a reasonable
assumption for an equity risk premium. The expected long-term return for each asset class is then
weighted based on the target asset allocation to develop the expected long-term rate of return on
assets assumption for the portfolio. This resulted in the selection of an assumed expected rate of
return of 7% for 2008 (7% for 2004 to 2007).
Discount rate
For the Canadian and U.S. pension and other post-employment plans, all future expected benefit
payment cash flows at each measurement date are discounted at spot rates developed from a yield
curve of AA corporate debt securities. It is assumed that spot rates beyond 30 years are equivalent
to the 30-year spot rate. The discount rate is selected as the equivalent level rate that would
produce the same discounted value as that determined by using the applicable spot rates. This
methodology does not rely on assumptions regarding reinvestment rates.
Royal Bank of Canada: Annual Report 2007
Consolidated Financial Statements 149
NOTE 20 PENSION AND OTHER POST-EMPLOYMENT BENEFITS (continued)
Sensitivity analysis
The following table presents the sensitivity analysis of certain key assumptions on defined benefit
pension and post-employment obligation and expense:
2007 Sensitivity of key assumptions
Change in
Change in
Pension
obligation
expense
Impact of .25% change in discount rate assumption
$
229
$
29
Impact of .25% change in rate of increase in future compensation assumption
23
6
Impact of .25% change in the long-term rate of return on plan assets assumption
—
15
Change in
Change in
Other post-employment
obligation
expense
Impact of .25% change in discount rate assumption
$
55
$
10
Impact of .25% change in rate of increase in future compensation assumption
—
—
Impact of 1.00% increase in health care cost trend rates
157
9
Impact of 1.00% decrease in health care cost trend rates
(129
)
(7
)
Reconciliation of defined benefit expense recognized with defined benefit expense incurred
The cost of pension and other post-employment benefits earned by employees is actuarially
determined using the projected benefit method pro-rated on services. The cost is computed using the
discount rate determined in accordance with the methodology described in significant assumptions,
and is based on management’s best estimate of expected plan investment performance, salary
escalation, retirement ages of employees and costs of health, dental, disability and life
insurance.
Actuarial gains or losses arise over time due to differences in actual experience compared to
actuarial assumptions. Prior service costs arise as a result of plan amendments. Adoption of CICA
Handbook Section 3461, Employee Future Benefits, resulted in recognition of a transitional asset
and obligation at the date of adoption.
The actuarial gains or losses, prior service costs and transitional asset or obligation are
amortized over the expected average remaining service lifetime of active members expected to
receive benefits under the plan. The following tables show the impact on our annual benefit expense
if we had recognized all costs and expenses as they arose.
Defined benefit pension expense incurred
2007
2006
2005
Defined benefit pension expense recognized
$
292
$
325
$
277
Difference between expected and actual return on plan assets
(227
)
(81
)
(423
)
Difference between actuarial losses (gains) amortized and actuarial losses (gains) arising
(246
)
(100
)
708
Difference between prior service costs amortized and prior service costs arising
(38
)
(2
)
(31
)
Amortization of transitional asset
2
2
2
Defined benefit pension expense incurred
$
(217
)
$
144
$
533
Other post-employment benefit expense incurred
2007
2006
2005
Other post-employment benefit expense recognized
$
104
$
107
$
195
Difference between expected and actual return on plan assets
(1
)
(1
)
(2
)
Difference between actuarial losses (gains) amortized and actuarial losses (gains) arising
(33
)
7
150
Difference between prior service costs amortized and prior service costs arising
23
(485
)
(1
)
Amortization of transitional obligation
—
(3
)
(17
)
Other post-employment benefit expense incurred
$
93
$
(375
)
$
325
NOTE 21 STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION
We offer stock-based compensation to certain key employees and to our non-employee directors. We
use derivatives and compensation trusts to manage our economic exposure to volatility in the price
of our common shares under many of these plans. The stock-based compensation amounts recorded in
Non-interest expense — Human resources in our Consolidated Statements of Income are net of the
impact of these derivatives.
Stock option plans
We have stock option plans for certain key employees and for non-employee directors. On November19, 2002, the Board of Directors discontinued all further grants of options under the non-employee
directors plan. Under the employee stock option plan, options are periodically granted to purchase
common shares. The exercise price for each grant is determined as the higher of the volume-weighted
average of the trading prices per board lot (100 shares) of our common shares on the Toronto Stock
Exchange (i) on the day preceding the day of grant; and (ii) the five consecutive trading days
immediately preceding
the day of grant. Stock options are normally granted at the end of the year, with the exercise
price determined at least five business days after the release of the year-end financial results.
The options vest over a four-year period for employees and are exercisable for a period not
exceeding 10 years from the grant date.
For options issued prior to November 1, 2002, that were not accompanied by tandem stock
appreciation rights (SARs), no compensation expense was recognized as the option’s exercise price
was not less than the market price of the underlying stock on the day of grant. When the options
are exercised, the proceeds received are credited to common shares.
Between November 29, 1999 and June 5, 2001, grants of options under the employee stock option
plan were accompanied by tandem SARs. With tandem SARs, participants could choose to exercise a SAR
instead of the corresponding option. In such cases, the participants received a cash payment equal
to the difference between the closing price of common shares on the day immediately preceding the
day of exercise and the exercise price of the option. During the last quarter of
Royal Bank of Canada: Annual Report 2007
150 Consolidated Financial Statements
2002 and first quarter of 2003, certain executive participants voluntarily renounced their SARs
while retaining the corresponding options. SARs obligations are now fully vested and give rise to
compensation expense as a result of changes in the market price of our common
shares. The compensation expense for these grants, which are accompanied by tandem SARs, was $19
million for the year ended October 31, 2007 (2006 — $27 million; 2005 — $42 million).
A summary of our stock option activity and related information
2007
2006
2005
Number
Weighted
Number
Weighted
Number
Weighted
of options
average
of options
average
of options
average
(000s)
exercise price
(000s)
exercise price
(000s)
exercise price
Outstanding at beginning of year
32,243
$
24.66
36,481
$
23.15
44,744
$
22.02
Granted
1,835
55.06
1,756
44.13
2,054
31.70
Exercised — Common shares (1), (2)
(7,215
)
21.10
(5,617
)
20.40
(9,917
)
19.85
— SARs
(204
)
21.50
(143
)
21.60
(320
)
21.01
Cancelled
(36
)
36.42
(234
)
24.36
(80
)
30.44
Outstanding at end of year
26,623
$
27.71
32,243
$
24.66
36,481
$
23.15
Exercisable at end of year
21,924
$
24.17
26,918
$
22.57
28,863
$
21.56
Available for grant
21,527
23,121
24,500
(1)
Cash received for options exercised during the year was $152 million (2006 — $115 million;
2005 — $197 million).
(2)
New shares were issued for all options exercised in 2007, 2006 and 2005. Refer to Note 18.
Options outstanding and options exercisable as at October 31, 2007 by range of exercise price
Options outstanding
Options exercisable
Weighted
Number
Weighted
average
Number
Weighted
outstanding
average
remaining
exercisable
average
(000s)
exercise price
contractual life
(000s)
exercise price
$8.47 — $8.91(1)
393
$
8.76
2.0
393
$
8.76
$15.00 — $19.82
6,071
17.75
1.5
6,071
17.75
$21.79 — $25.00
9,533
24.58
3.4
9,533
24.58
$26.10 — $31.70
7,062
30.42
5.6
5,501
30.09
$44.13 — $57.90
3,564
49.75
8.6
426
44.13
Total
26,623
$
27.71
4.2
21,924
$
24.17
(1)
The weighted average exercise prices have been revised to reflect the conversion of
foreign currency- denominated options at the exchange rate as at our Consolidated Balance
Sheet date.
Fair value method
CICA 3870 requires recognition of an expense for option awards using the fair value method of
accounting. Under this method, the fair value of an award at the grant date is amortized over the
applicable vesting period and recognized as compensation expense. We adopted the fair value method
of accounting prospectively for new awards granted after November 1, 2002. The fair value
compensation expense recorded for the year ended October 31, 2007, in respect of these plans was $13
million (2006 — $13 million; 2005 — $14 million). The compensation expenses related to non-vested
awards were $14 million
at October 31, 2007 (2006 — $13 million; 2005 — $16 million), to be recognized over the weighted
average period of 2.2 years (2006 — 2.0 years; 2005 — 1.7 years).
CICA 3870 permits the use of other recognition methods, including the intrinsic value method,
provided pro forma disclosures of net income and earnings per share calculated in accordance with
the fair value method are presented. For awards granted before November 1, 2002, pro forma net
income and earnings per share are presented in the following table.
As reported
Pro forma (1), (2)
2007
2006
2005
2005
Net income from continuing operations
$
5,492
$
4,757
$
3,437
$
3,424
Net loss from discontinued operations (3)
—
(29
)
(50
)
(50
)
Net income
$
5,492
$
4,728
$
3,387
$
3,374
Basic earnings (loss) per share
From continuing operations
$
4.24
$
3.67
$
2.65
$
2.64
From discontinued operations
—
(.02
)
(.04
)
(.04
)
Total
$
4.24
$
3.65
$
2.61
$
2.60
Diluted earnings (loss) per share
From continuing operations
$
4.19
$
3.61
$
2.61
$
2.60
From discontinued operations
—
(.02
)
(.04
)
(.04
)
Total
$
4.19
$
3.59
$
2.57
$
2.56
(1)
Compensation expense under the fair value method is recognized over the vesting period of the
related stock options. Accordingly, the pro forma results of applying this method may not be
indicative of future amounts.
(2)
During the first quarter of 2006, all awards granted prior to adopting the fair value
method of accounting were fully vested and their fair values at the grant dates had been
fully amortized; therefore, there are no pro forma results to disclose for the year
ended October 31, 2007 and 2006.
(3)
Refer to Note 11.
Royal Bank of Canada: Annual Report 2007
Consolidated Financial Statements 151
The weighted average fair value of options granted during 2007 was estimated at $7.84 (2006 —
$6.80; 2005 — $4.66) using an option pricing model on the date of grant. The following assumptions
were used:
For the year ended October 31
2007
2006
2005
Weighted average assumptions
Risk-free interest rate
3.82
%
3.98
%
3.75
%
Expected dividend yield
3.06
%
3.16
%
3.25
%
Expected share price volatility
16
%
17
%
17
%
Expected life of option
6 years
6 years
6 years
Employee savings and share ownership plans
We offer many employees an opportunity to own our shares through savings and share ownership plans.
Under these plans, the employees can generally contribute between 1% and 10% of their annual salary
or benefit base for commissioned employees. For each contribution between 1% and 6%, we will match
50% of the employee contributions in our common shares. For the RBC Dominion Securities Savings
Plan our maximum annual contribution is $4,500 per employee. For the RBC U.K. Share Incentive Plan
our maximum annual contribution is Ł1,500 per employee. In 2007, we contributed $64 million (2006
— $60 million; 2005 — $56 million), under the terms of these plans, towards the purchase of our common
shares. As at October 31, 2007, an aggregate of 34.4 million common shares were held under these
plans.
Deferred share and other plans
We offer deferred share unit plans to executives, non-employee directors and to certain key
employees. Under these plans, the executives or directors may choose to receive all or a percentage
of their annual variable short-term incentive bonus or directors’ fee in the form of deferred share
units (DSUs). The executives or directors must elect to participate in the plan prior to the
beginning of the year. DSUs earn dividend equivalents in the form of additional DSUs at the same
rate as dividends on common shares. The participant is not allowed to convert the DSUs until
retirement, permanent disability or termination of employment/directorship. The cash value of the
DSUs is equivalent to the market value of common shares when conversion takes place. The value of
the DSUs liability as at October 31, 2007, was $285 million (2006 — $232 million; 2005 — $172
million). The share price fluctuations and dividend equivalents compensation expense recorded for
the year ended October 31, 2007, in respect of these plans was $37 million (2006 — $45 million; 2005
— $42 million).
We have a deferred bonus plan for certain key employees within Capital Markets. Under this
plan, a percentage of each employee’s annual incentive bonus is deferred and accumulates dividend
equivalents at the same rate as dividends on common shares. The employee will receive the deferred
bonus in equal amounts paid within 90 days of the three following year-end dates. The value of the
deferred bonus paid will be equivalent to the original deferred bonus adjusted for dividends and
changes in the market value of common shares at the time the bonus is paid. The value of the
deferred bonus liability as at October 31, 2007, was $490 million (2006 — $401 million; 2005 — $320
million). The share price fluctuations and dividend equivalents compensation expense for the year
ended October 31, 2007, in respect of this plan was $62 million (2006 — $51 million; 2005 — $57
million).
We offer performance deferred share award plans to certain key employees, all of which vest at
the end of three years. Awards under the plans are deferred in the form of common shares which are
held in trust until they fully vest or in the form of DSUs. A portion of the award under some plans
can be increased or decreased up to 50%, depending on our total shareholder return compared to a
defined peer group of North American financial institutions. The value of the award paid will be
equivalent to the original award adjusted for dividends and changes in the market value of common
shares at the time the award vests. The number of our common shares held in trust as at October 31,2007, was 2.3 million (2006 — 5.3 million; 2005 — 7.3 million). The value of the DSUs liability as
at October 31, 2007 was $250 million (2006 — $153 million; 2005 — $38 million). The compensation
expense recorded for the year ended October 31, 2007, in respect of these plans was $168 million
(2006 — $148 million; 2005 — $109 million).
We maintain a non-qualified deferred compensation plan for key employees in the United States
under an arrangement called the RBC U.S. Wealth Accumulation Plan. This plan allows eligible
employees to make deferrals of a portion of their annual income and allocate the deferrals among
various fund choices, which include a share unit fund that tracks the value of our common shares.
Certain deferrals may also be eligible for matching contributions, all of which are allocated to
the RBC share unit fund. Our liability for the RBC share units held under the plan as at October31, 2007, was $285 million (2006 — $289 million; 2005 — $236 million). The compensation expense
recorded for the year ended October 31, 2007, was $157 million (2006 — $110 million; 2005 — $90
million).
For other stock-based plans, compensation expense of $9 million was recognized for the year
ended October 31, 2007 (2006 — $10 million; 2005 — $8 million). The liability for the share units
held under these plans as at October 31, 2007, was $21 million (2006 — $4 million; 2005 — $19
million). The number of our common shares held under these plans was .3 million (2006 — .3 million;
2005 — .3 million).
Royal Bank of Canada: Annual Report 2007
152 Consolidated Financial Statements
Total trading revenue includes both trading-related Net interest income and trading revenue
reported in Non-interest income. Net interest income arises from interest and dividends related to
trading assets and liabilities and amortization of premiums and discounts
arising on their acquisition or issuance. Non-interest income includes realized and unrealized
gains and losses on trading securities and trading derivative financial instruments.
Trading revenue
2007
2006
2005
Net interest income
$
(390
)
$
(539
)
$
21
Non-interest income
2,261
2,574
1,594
Total
$
1,871
$
2,035
$
1,615
By product line
Interest rate and credit
$
693
$
1,174
1,025
Equities
823
561
355
Foreign exchange and commodities (1)
355
300
235
Total
$
1,871
$
2,035
$
1,615
(1)
Includes precious metals.
NOTE 23 BUSINESS REALIGNMENT CHARGES
The
following table sets out the changes in our business realignment charges since November 1,2004. These charges are recorded in Other liabilities and include the income-protection payments
for the 2,015 employees who have been terminated as of October 31, 2007. Although the majority of
the initiatives were substantially completed during 2006, the associated income-protection payments
to severed employees and certain lease obligations continue. Prior to 2007, the charges pertaining to
RBC Mortgage were recorded in Liabilities of operations held for sale. These charges include the
remaining lease obligations in connection with its former Chicago headquarters and 40 of its
branches which we vacated but remain the lessee.
Business realignment charges
2007
2006
2005
Continuing operations
Balance at beginning of year
$
43
$
118
$
177
Employee-related charges
—
(3
)
40
Premises-related charges
—
3
-
Other adjustments including foreign exchange
—
(1
)
(5
)
Cash payments
(35
)
(74
)
(94
)
Balance at end of year
$
8
$
43
$
118
Discontinued operations
Balance at beginning of year
$
14
$
13
$
15
Employee-related charges
—
—
1
Premises-related charges
(4
)
6
12
Cash payments
(3
)
(5
)
(15
)
Balance at end of year
$
7
$
14
$
13
Employee-related
$
7
Premises-related
8
Total
$
15
Royal Bank of Canada: Annual Report 2007
Consolidated Financial Statements 153
Income taxes (recoveries) in Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income and
Changes in Shareholders’ Equity
Continuing operations
Other comprehensive income (1)
Net unrealized gains (losses) on available-for-sale securities
(26
)
n.a.
n.a.
Reclassification of (gains) losses on available-for-sale securities to income
15
n.a.
n.a.
Net foreign currency translation gains (losses), net of hedging activities
911
130
204
Net unrealized gains (losses) on derivatives designated as cash flow hedges
43
n.a.
n.a.
Reclassification to income of (gains) losses on derivatives designated as cash
flow hedges
16
n.a.
n.a.
Issuance costs
(12
)
(4
)
2
Stock appreciation rights
5
4
5
Wealth accumulation plan gains
—
—
7
Other
(6
)
6
2
Subtotal
946
136
220
Total income taxes
$
2,338
$
1,521
$
1,466
(1)
Other comprehensive income was introduced under GAAP upon the adoption of Section
1530 on November 1, 2006 (refer to Note 1). Accordingly, there are no comparative figures for
prior periods, other than the figures related to foreign currency translation gains (losses), which
are now included as part of OCI.
n.a.
not applicable
Sources of future income taxes
2007
2006
Future income tax asset
Allowance for credit losses
$
460
$
439
Deferred compensation
642
616
Pension related
188
101
Business realignment charges
10
27
Tax loss carryforwards
91
68
Deferred income
115
151
Enron litigation provision
204
253
Other (1)
460
335
2,170
1,990
Valuation allowance
(10
)
(10
)
2,160
1,980
Future income tax liability
Premises and equipment
(245
)
(214
)
Deferred expense
(138
)
(225
)
Other (1)
(526
)
(437
)
(909
)
(876
)
Net future income tax asset
$
1,251
$
1,104
(1)
Includes deferred taxes from the transition adjustment and other comprehensive income as a result of the adoption of the new financial instruments accounting standards on
November 1, 2006.
Royal Bank of Canada: Annual Report 2007
154 Consolidated Financial Statements
Net future income tax assets are included in Other assets (refer to Note 12) and result from
temporary differences between the tax basis of assets and liabilities and their carrying amounts on
our Consolidated Balance Sheets. Included in the tax loss carryforwards amount is $91 million of
future income tax assets related to losses in our Canadian, U.K. and U.S. operations (2006 — $31
million) which expire starting in 2008. There is no tax asset related to capital losses in 2007
(2006 — $27 million).
We believe that, based on all available evidence, it is more likely than not that all of the future
income tax assets, net of the valuation allowance, will be realized through a combination of future
reversals of temporary differences and taxable income.
Reconciliation to statutory tax rate
2007
2006
2005
Income taxes at Canadian statutory tax rate
$
2,431
34.6
%
$
2,152
34.7
%
$
1,632
34.7
%
(Decrease) increase in income taxes resulting from
Lower average tax rate applicable to subsidiaries
(734
)
(10.4
)
(599
)
(9.6
)
(251
)
(5.3
)
Tax-exempt income from securities
(272
)
(3.9
)
(184
)
(3.0
)
(85
)
(1.8
)
Tax rate change
30
.4
13
.2
—
—
Other
(63
)
(.9
)
21
.3
(18
)
(.4
)
Income taxes reported in Consolidated Statements of Income before discontinued operations and
effective tax rate
$
1,392
19.8
%
$
1,403
22.6
%
$
1,278
27.2
%
International earnings of certain subsidiaries would be taxed only upon their repatriation to
Canada. We have not recognized a future income tax liability for these undistributed earnings as we
do not currently expect them to be repatriated. Taxes that would be payable
if all foreign subsidiaries’ accumulated unremitted earnings were repatriated are estimated at $843
million as at October 31,2007 (2006 — $822 million; 2005 — $745 million).
NOTE 25 EARNINGS PER SHARE
2007
2006
2005
Basic earnings per share
Net income from continuing operations
$
5,492
$
4,757
$
3,437
Net loss from discontinued operations (1)
—
(29
)
(50
)
Net income
5,492
4,728
3,387
Preferred share dividends
(88
)
(60
)
(42
)
Net gain on redemption of preferred shares
—
—
4
Net income available to common shareholders
$
5,404
$
4,668
$
3,349
Average number of common shares (in thousands)
1,273,185
1,279,956
1,283,433
Basic earnings (loss) per share
Continuing operations
$
4.24
$
3.67
$
2.65
Discontinued operations
—
(.02
)
(.04
)
Total
$
4.24
$
3.65
$
2.61
Diluted earnings per share
Net income available to common shareholders
$
5,404
$
4,668
$
3,349
Average number of common shares (in thousands)
1,273,185
1,279,956
1,283,433
Stock options (2)
13,254
14,573
13,686
Issuable under other stock-based compensation plans
2,875
5,256
7,561
Average number of diluted common shares (in thousands)
1,289,314
1,299,785
1,304,680
Diluted earnings (loss) per share
Continuing operations
$
4.19
$
3.61
$
2.61
Discontinued operations
—
(.02
)
(.04
)
Total
$
4.19
$
3.59
$
2.57
(1)
Refer to Note 11.
(2)
The dilutive effect of stock options was calculated using the treasury stock method. For
2007, we excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings per share 16,224 average options
outstanding with an exercise price of $57.90 as the exercise price of these options was greater
than the average market price of our common shares. During 2006 and 2005, no option was outstanding
with an exercise price exceeding the average market price of our common shares.
Royal Bank of Canada: Annual Report 2007
Consolidated Financial Statements 155
Concentrations of credit risk exist if a number of clients are engaged in similar activities, or
are located in the same geographic region or have comparable economic characteristics such that
their ability to meet contractual obligations would be similarly affected by changes in economic,
political or other conditions. Concentrations of credit risk
indicate the relative sensitivity of our performance to developments affecting a particular
industry or geographic location. The amounts of credit exposure associated with our on- and
off-balance sheet financial instruments are summarized in the following table:
2007
2006
Other
Other
United
Inter-
United
Inter-
Canada
%
States
%
Europe
%
national
%
Total
Canada
%
States
%
Europe
%
national
%
Total
On-balance
sheet assets other than derivatives (1)
$
227,206
72
%
$
41,518
13
%
40,658
13
%
$
6,146
2
%
$
315,528
$
204,488
73
%
$
41,467
15
%
$
27,358
10
%
$
5,112
2
%
$
278,425
Derivatives before master netting agreement
(2), (3)
14,690
23
15,096
23
29,501
45
5,763
9
65,050
9,855
27
9,171
25
15,891
42
2,148
6
37,065
$
241,896
64
%
$
56,614
15
%
$
70,159
18
%
$
11,909
3
%
$
380,578
$
214,343
68
%
$
50,368
16
%
$
43,249
14
%
$
7,260
2
%
$
315,490
Off-balance sheet credit instruments (4)
Committed and uncommitted (5)
$
81,251
55
%
$
52,393
35
%
$
12,725
9
%
$
2,329
1
%
$
148,698
$
78,851
55
%
$
51,224
35
%
$
12,997
9
%
$
1,802
1
%
$
144,874
Other
31,194
53
13,418
23
14,226
24
87
—
58,925
28,563
47
11,563
19
19,776
33
738
1
60,640
$
112,445
54
%
$
65,811
32
%
$
26,951
13
%
$
2,416
1
%
$
207,623
$
107,414
52
%
$
62,787
31
%
$
32,773
16
%
$
2,540
1
%
$
205,514
(1)
Includes assets purchased under reverse repurchase agreements and securities borrowed, loans
and customers’ liability under acceptances. The largest concentrations in Canada are Ontario
at 51% (2006—52%), the Prairies at 16% (2006—14%), British Columbia at 15% (2006—14%) and
Quebec at 14% (2006—15%). No industry accounts for more than 10% of total on-balance sheet
credit instruments.
(2)
The largest concentration of credit exposure by counterparty type is banks at 60% (2006 — 59%).
(3)
Excludes credit derivatives classified as other than trading with a replacement cost of $36
million (2006 — $20 million).
(4)
Represents financial instruments with contractual amounts representing credit risk.
(5)
Of the commitments to extend credit, the largest industry concentration relates to
financial services of 40% (2006 — 38%), mining and energy of 12% (2006 — 13%),
commercial real estate of 7% (2006 — 6%), government of 4% (2006 — 5%),
wholesale of 4% (2006 — 5%), manufacturing of 4% (2006 — 4%) and transportation of 3%
(2006 — 3%).
NOTE 27 GUARANTEES, COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Guarantees
In the normal course of our business,
we enter into numerous agreements that may contain features
that meet the definition of a guarantee pursuant to AcG-14. AcG-14 defines a guarantee to be a contract (including an indemnity) that
contingently requires us to make payments (in cash, other assets, our own shares or provision of
services) to a third party based on: (i) changes in an underlying interest rate, foreign exchange
rate, equity or commodity instrument, index or other variable, that is related to an asset, a
liability or an equity security of the counterparty; (ii) failure of another party to perform under
an obligating agreement; or (iii) failure of another third party to pay its indebtedness when due.
Effective November 1, 2006, a liability is now recognized on our Consolidated Balance Sheets at the
inception of a guarantee for the fair value of the obligation undertaken in issuing the guarantee.
No subsequent remeasurement at fair value is required unless the financial guarantee qualifies as a
derivative. If the financial guarantee meets the definition of a derivative, it is remeasured at
fair value at each balance sheet date and reported as a derivative in Other assets or Other
liabilities as appropriate.
As the carrying value of these financial guarantees is not indicative of the maximum potential
amount of future payments, we continue to consider financial guarantees as off-balance sheet credit
instruments. The maximum potential amount of future payments represents the maximum risk of loss if
there was a total default by the guaranteed parties, without consideration of possible recoveries
under recourse provisions, insurance policies or from collateral held or pledged.
The table below summarizes significant guarantees we have provided to third parties:
2007
2006
Maximum
Maximum
potential amount
potential amount
of future
Carrying
of future
Carrying
payments
amount
payments
amount (1)
Credit derivatives and written put options (2), (3)
$
70,242
$
2,657
$
54,723
$
352
Backstop liquidity facilities
43,066
41
34,342
—
Stable value products (3)
17,369
—
16,098
—
Financial standby letters of credit and performance guarantees (4)
16,661
57
15,902
17
Credit enhancements
4,814
30
4,155
—
Mortgage loans sold with recourse
230
—
204
—
(1)
For credit derivatives and written put options, the prior period comparatives represent
the fair values of the derivatives; for financial standby letters of credit and
performance guarantees, they represent unamortized premiums received.
(2)
The carrying amount is included in Other — Derivatives on our Consolidated Balance Sheets.
(3)
The notional amount of these contracts approximates the maximum potential amount of future
payments.
(4)
The carrying amount is included in Other—Other liabilities on our Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Royal Bank of Canada: Annual Report 2007
156 Consolidated Financial Statements
In addition to the above guarantees, we transact substantially all of our securities lending
activities in which we act as an agent for the owners of securities through our joint venture, RBC
Dexia IS. As at October 31, 2007, RBC Dexia IS securities lending indemnifications totalled $63,462
million (2006 — $45,614 million); we are exposed to 50% of this amount.
Credit derivatives and written put options
Our clients may enter into credit derivatives or written
put options for speculative or hedging purposes. AcG-14 defines a guarantee to include derivative
contracts that contingently require us to make payments to a guaranteed party based on changes in
an underlying that is related to an asset, a liability or an equity security of a guaranteed party.
We have only disclosed amounts for transactions where it would be probable, based on the
information available to us, that the client would use the credit derivative or written put option
to protect against changes in an underlying that is related to an asset, a liability or an equity
security held by the client.
We enter into written credit derivatives that are over-the-counter contractual agreements to
compensate another party for its financial loss following the occurrence of a credit event in
relation to a specified reference obligation, such as a bond or loan. The terms of these credit
derivatives vary based on the contract and can range up to 15 years.
We enter into written put options that are contractual agreements under which we grant the
purchaser the right, but not the obligation to sell, by or at a set date, a specified amount of a
financial instrument at a predetermined price. Written put options that typically qualify as
guarantees include foreign exchange contracts, equity-based contracts and certain commodity-based
contracts. The term of these options varies based on the contract and can range up to five years.
Collateral we hold for credit derivatives and written put options is managed on a portfolio
basis and may include cash, government T-bills and bonds.
Backstop liquidity facilities
Backstop liquidity facilities are provided to asset-backed commercial paper conduit programs
(programs) administered by us and third parties, as an alternative source of financing in the event
that such programs are unable to access commercial paper markets, or in limited circumstances, when
predetermined performance measures of the financial assets owned by
these programs are not met. We generally provide liquidity facilities
for a term of one year.
Backstop liquidity facilities are also provided to non-asset-backed programs such as variable
rate demand notes issued by third parties. These standby facilities provide liquidity support to
the issuer to buy the notes if the issuer is unable to remarket the notes, as long as the
instrument and/or the issuer maintains the investment grade rating.
The terms of the backstop liquidity facilities do not require us to advance money to these
programs in the event of bankruptcy or to purchase non-performing or defaulted assets. None of the
backstop liquidity facilities that we have provided have been drawn upon.
Stable value products
We sell stable value products that offer book value protection primarily to plan sponsors of
Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA)-governed pension plans such as 401(k) plans
and 457 plans. The book value protection is provided on portfolios of intermediate/short-term
investment-grade fixed income securities and is intended to cover any shortfall in the event that
plan participants withdraw funds when market value is below book value. We retain the option to
exit the contract at any time. For stable value products, collateral we hold is managed on a
portfolio basis and may include cash, government T-bills and bonds.
Financial standby letters of credit and performance guarantees
Financial standby letters of credit
and performance guarantees represent irrevocable assurances that we will make payments in the event
that a client cannot meet its obligations to third parties. The term of
these guarantees can range up to eight years. Our policy for requiring collateral security with
respect to these instruments and the types of collateral security held is generally the same as for
loans. When collateral security is taken, it is determined on an account by account basis according
to the risk of the borrower and the specifics of the transaction. Collateral security may include
cash, securities and other assets pledged.
Credit enhancements
We provide partial credit enhancement to multi-seller programs administered by us to protect
commercial paper investors in the event that the collection on the underlying assets, the
transaction specific credit enhancement or the liquidity proves to be insufficient to pay for
maturing commercial paper. Each of the asset pools is structured to achieve a high investment-grade
credit profile through credit enhancement related to each transaction. The term of these credit
facilities is between one and four years.
Mortgage loans sold with recourse
Through our various agreements with investors, we may be required to repurchase U.S. originated
mortgage loans sold to an investor if the loans are uninsured for greater than one year, or refund
any premium received where mortgage loans are prepaid or in default within 120 days. The mortgage
loans are fully collateralized by residential properties.
Securities lending indemnifications
We generally transact securities lending transactions through our joint venture, RBC Dexia IS. In
these transactions, RBC Dexia IS acts as an agent for the owner of a security, who agrees to lend
the security to a borrower for a fee, under the terms of a pre-arranged contract. The borrower must
fully collateralize the security loaned at all times. As part of this custodial business, an
indemnification may be provided to securities lending customers to ensure that the fair value of
securities loaned will be returned in the event that the borrower fails to return the borrowed
securities and the collateral held is insufficient to cover the fair value of those securities.
These indemnifications normally terminate without being drawn upon. The term of these
indemnifications varies, as the securities loaned are recallable on demand. Collateral held for our
securities lending transactions typically includes cash or securities that are issued or guaranteed
by the Canadian government, U.S. government or other OECD countries.
Indemnifications
In the normal course of our operations, we provide indemnifications which are often standard
contractual terms to counterparties in transactions such as purchase and sale contracts, service
agreements, director/officer contracts and leasing transactions. These indemnification agreements
may require us to compensate the counterparties for costs incurred as a result of changes in laws
and regulations (including tax legislation) or as a result of litigation claims or statutory
sanctions that may be suffered by the counterparty as a consequence of the transaction. The terms
of these indemnification agreements will vary based on the contract. The nature of the
indemnification agreements prevents us from making a reasonable estimate of the maximum potential
amount we could be required to pay to counterparties. Historically, we have not made any
significant payments under such indemnifications.
Other off-balance sheet credit instruments
In addition to financial guarantees, we utilize other off-balance sheet credit instruments to meet
the financing needs of our clients. The contractual amounts of these credit instruments represent
the maximum possible credit risk without taking into account the fair value of any collateral, in
the event other parties fail to perform their obligations under these instruments. Our credit
review process, our policy for requiring collateral security and the types of collateral security
held
Royal Bank of Canada: Annual Report 2007
Consolidated Financial Statements 157
NOTE 27 GUARANTEES, COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (continued)
are generally the same as for loans. Many of these instruments expire without being drawn upon. As
a result, the contractual amounts may not necessarily represent our actual future credit risk
exposure or cash flow requirements.
Commitments to extend credit represent unused portions of authorizations to extend credit in
the form of loans, bankers’ acceptances or letters of credit.
In securities lending transactions, we lend our own or our clients’ securities to a borrower
for a fee under the terms of a pre-arranged contract. The borrower must fully collateralize the
security loaned at all times.
Uncommitted amounts represent an amount for which we retain the option to extend credit to a
borrower.
Documentary and commercial letters of credit, which are written undertakings by us on behalf
of a client authorizing a third party to draw drafts on us up to a stipulated amount under specific
terms and conditions, are collateralized by the underlying shipment of goods to which they relate.
A note issuance facility represents an underwriting agreement that enables a borrower to issue
short-term debt securities. A revolving underwriting facility represents a renewable note issuance
facility that can be accessed for a specified period of time.
The
following table summarizes the contractual amounts of our other off-balance sheet credit
instruments:
Other off-balance sheet credit instruments
2007
2006
Commitments to extend credit (1)
Original term to maturity of 1 year or less
$
55,281
$
57,154
Original term to maturity of more than 1 year
46,307
42,222
Securities lending
36,187
38,185
Uncommitted amounts (2)
47,110
45,498
Documentary and commercial letters of credit
501
713
Note issuances and revolving underwriting facilities
—
8
$
185,386
$
183,780
(1)
Includes liquidity facilities.
(2)
Includes uncommitted liquidity loan facilities of
$42.2 billion (2006 — $34.6 billion) provided
to RBC-administered multi-seller conduits. As at October 31,2007, $758 million (2006 — $ nil) was
drawn upon on these facilities and is included in Loans.
Pledged assets
In the ordinary course of business, we pledge assets recorded on our Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Details of assets pledged against liabilities are shown in the following tables:
Pledged assets
2007
2006
Cash and due from banks
$
305
$
100
Interest-bearing deposits with banks
3,443
1,936
Loans
1,733
187
Securities
51,695
56,580
Assets purchased under reverse repurchase agreements
40,698
36,788
Other assets
1,132
941
$
99,006
$
96,532
2007
2006
Assets pledged to:
Foreign governments and central banks
$
1,981
$
1,794
Clearing systems, payment systems and depositories
1,772
2,309
Assets pledged in relation to:
Securities borrowing and lending
34,881
38,118
Obligations related to securities sold under repurchase agreements
48,479
44,651
Derivative transactions
8,502
6,547
Other
3,391
3,113
$
99,006
$
96,532
Royal Bank of Canada: Annual Report 2007
158 Consolidated Financial Statements
As at October 31, 2007, the approximate market value of collateral accepted that may be sold or
repledged by us was $122.4 billion (2006 — $109.1 billion). This collateral was received in
connection with reverse repurchase agreements, securities borrowings and loans, and derivative
transactions. Of this amount, $56.5 billion (2006 — $48.0 billion) has been sold or repledged,
generally as collateral under repurchase agreements or to cover short sales.
Lease commitments
Minimum future rental commitments for premises and equipment under long-term non-cancellable
operating and capital leases for the next five years and thereafter are as follows:
Lease commitments(1)
2008
$
494
2009
453
2010
382
2011
329
2012
279
Thereafter
1,224
$
3,161
(1)
Substantially all of our lease commitments are related to operating leases.
Litigation
Enron Corp. (Enron) litigation
A purported class of purchasers of Enron who publicly traded equity and debt securities between
January 9, 1999, and November 27, 2001, has named Royal Bank of Canada and certain related entities
as defendants in an action entitled Regents of the University of California v. Royal Bank of Canada
in the United States District Court, Southern District of Texas (Houston Division). In addition, Royal Bank of Canada and certain related
entities have been named as defendants in several other Enron-related cases, which are filed in
various courts in the U.S., asserting similar claims filed by purchasers of Enron securities. Royal
Bank of Canada is also a third-party defendant in cases in which Enron’s accountants, Arthur
Andersen LLP, filed third-party claims against a number of parties, seeking contribution if Arthur
Andersen LLP is found liable to plaintiffs in these actions.
We review the status of these matters on an ongoing basis and will exercise our judgment in
resolving them in such a manner as we believe to be in our best interests. As with any litigation,
there are significant uncertainties surrounding the timing and outcome. Uncertainty is exacerbated as
a result of the large number of cases, the multiple defendants in many of them, the novel issues
presented, and the current difficult litigation environment. Although it is not possible to predict
the ultimate outcome of these lawsuits, the timing of their resolution or our exposure, during the
fourth quarter of 2005, we established a litigation provision of $591 million (US$500 million) or
$326 million after-tax (US$276 million). We believe the ultimate resolution of these lawsuits and
other proceedings, while not likely to have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial
position, may be material to our operating results for the particular period in which the
resolution occurs, notwithstanding the provision established in the fourth quarter of 2005. We will continue to vigorously defend ourselves in these cases.
Other
Various other legal proceedings are pending that challenge certain of our practices or actions. We
consider that the aggregate liability resulting from these other proceedings will not be material
to our financial position or results of operations.
NOTE 28 CONTRACTUAL REPRICING AND MATURITY SCHEDULE
The
following table details our exposure to interest rate risk as defined and prescribed by CICA
Handbook Section 3861, Financial Instruments - Disclosure and Presentation. On- and off-balance
sheet financial instruments are reported based on the earlier of their contractual repricing date
or maturity date. Effective interest rates have been disclosed where applicable. The effective
rates shown represent historical rates for fixed-rate instruments carried at amortized cost and
current market rates for floating-rate instruments or instruments
carried at fair value. The following table
does not incorporate management’s
expectation of future events where expected repricing or maturity dates differ significantly from
the contractual dates. We incorporate these assumptions in the management of interest rate risk
exposure. These assumptions include expected repricing of trading instruments and certain loans and
deposits. Taking into account these assumptions on the consolidated contractual repricing and
maturity schedule at October 31, 2007, would result in a change in the under-one-year gap from
$(74.4) billion to $(53.3) billion (2006 — $(79.8) billion to $(40.2) billion).
Royal Bank of Canada: Annual Report 2007
Consolidated Financial Statements 159
NOTE 28 CONTRACTUAL REPRICING AND MATURITY SCHEDULE (continued)
Carrying amount by earlier of contractual repricing or maturity date
Immediately
interest
Under 3
3 to 6
Over 6 to
Over 1 to
Over 5
Non-rate-
rate-sensitive
months
months
12 months
5 years
years
sensitive
Total
Assets
Cash and deposits with banks
$
—
$
14,317
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
1,790
$
16,107
Effective interest rate
—
4.71
%
—
—
—
—
—
Securities
Trading
—
27,559
4,856
5,208
22,790
26,149
61,684
148,246
Effective interest rate
—
4.66
%
4.74
%
4.63
%
4.71
%
4.97
%
—
Available-for-sale
—
8,263
1,958
2,096
12,240
2,326
3,126
30,009
Effective interest rate
—
4.68
%
4.84
%
4.77
%
4.78
%
4.92
%
—
Assets purchased under reverse repurchase
agreements and securities borrowed
—
62,393
1,920
—
—
—
—
64,313
Effective interest rate
—
4.81
%
4.67
%
—
—
—
—
Loans (net of allowance for loan losses) (1)
101,692
25,664
8,079
14,071
80,795
7,418
217
237,936
Effective interest rate
—
5.46
%
5.54
%
5.31
%
5.38
%
6.04
%
—
Derivatives
28,591
2,480
—
—
6
—
35,508
66,585
Effective interest rate
—
4.79
%
—
—
4.62
%
—
—
Other assets
—
—
—
—
—
—
37,150
37,150
$
130,283
$
140,676
$
16,813
$
21,375
$
115,831
$
35,893
$
139,475
$
600,346
Liabilities
Deposits
$
148,072
$
112,388
$
23,461
$
24,779
$
49,219
$
5,915
$
1,371
$
365,205
Effective interest rate
—
4.45
%
4.42
%
4.36
%
4.18
%
4.81
%
—
Obligations related to assets sold under
repurchase agreements and securities
loaned
—
34,748
1,838
396
—
—
51
37,033
Effective interest rate
—
4.77
%
4.76
%
4.79
%
—
—
—
Obligations related to securities sold short
—
1,402
316
596
10,892
11,097
20,386
44,689
Effective interest rate
—
4.72
%
4.71
%
4.59
%
4.54
%
4.87
%
—
Derivatives
29,346
4,404
—
—
4
13
38,243
72,010
Effective interest rate
—
4.80
%
—
—
4.60
%
4.96
%
—
Other liabilities
—
250
106
273
649
214
46,060
47,552
Effective interest rate
—
4.82
%
4.85
%
4.64
%
4.65
%
5.10
%
—
Subordinated debentures
—
886
—
—
3,892
1,465
(8
)
6,235
Effective interest rate
—
5.64
%
—
—
5.01
%
6.40
%
—
Trust capital securities
—
—
—
—
1,400
—
—
1,400
Effective interest rate
—
—
—
—
7.23
%
—
—
Preferred share liabilities
—
—
—
300
—
—
—
300
Effective interest rate
—
—
—
4.72
%
—
—
—
Non-controlling interest in subsidiaries
—
—
—
—
1,200
—
283
1,483
Effective interest rate
—
—
—
—
4.87
%
—
—
Shareholders’ equity
—
—
—
—
—
2,050
22,389
24,439
Effective interest rate
—
—
—
—
—
4.14
%
—
$
177,418
$
154,078
$
25,721
$
26,344
$
67,256
$
20,754
$
128,775
$
600,346
Total gap based on contractual repricing
$
(47,135
)
$
(13,402
)
$
(8,908
)
$
(4,969
)
$
48,575
$
15,139
$
10,700
$
—
Canadian dollar
(23,067
)
9,417
11,450
(6,183
)
22,680
(6,296
)
(8,000
)
1
Foreign currency
(24,068
)
(22,819
)
(20,358
)
1,214
25,895
21,435
18,700
(1
)
Total gap
$
(47,135
)
$
(13,402
)
$
(8,908
)
$
(4,969
)
$
48,575
$
15,139
$
10,700
$
—
Canadian
dollar — 2006
$
(26,367
)
$
(24,559
)
$
5,204
$
(1,764
)
$
52,937
$
11,628
$
(17,083
)
$
(4
)
Foreign
currency — 2006
(18,902
)
8,856
(19,898
)
(2,372
)
14,282
21,917
(3,879
)
4
Total gap
— 2006
$
(45,269
)
$
(15,703
)
$
(14,694
)
$
(4,136
)
$
67,219
$
33,545
$
(20,962
)
$
—
(1)
Includes loans totalling $1,202 million to a variable
interest entity administered by us, with maturity terms exceeding five years.
NOTE 29 RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
In the
ordinary course of business, we provide normal banking services and
operational services,
and enter into other transactions with associated and other related corporations, including our
joint venture entities, on terms similar to those offered to non-related parties. Refer to Note 9
for more information regarding our joint venture, RBC Dexia IS.
We grant loans to directors, officers and other employees at rates normally accorded to
preferred clients.
As at October 31, 2007, the aggregate indebtedness, excluding routine
indebtedness, to RBC or its subsidiaries of current directors and executive
officers was approximately $3.2 million. Routine indebtedness includes
(i) loans made on terms no more favourable than loans to employees
generally, but not exceeding $50,000 to any directors and executive officer;
(ii) loans to employees, fully secured against their residence and
not exceeding their annual salary; (iii) loans, other than to employees,
on substantially the same terms available to other customers with comparable
credit ratings and involving no more than the usual risk of collectibility;
and (iv) loans for purchases on usual trade terms, or for ordinary
travel or expense advances, with usual commercial repayment arrangements.
We also offer deferred share
and other plans to non-employee directors, executives and certain other key employees. Refer to
Note 21.
Royal Bank of Canada: Annual Report 2007
160 Consolidated Financial Statements
NOTE 30 RESULTS BY BUSINESS AND GEOGRAPHIC SEGMENT (continued)
Revenue by business line
2007
2006
2005
Banking (1)
$
10,485
$
9,418
$
8,761
Wealth management
3,992
3,487
3,151
Global insurance
3,192
3,348
3,311
Global markets (2)
2,455
2,579
2,256
Global investment banking and equity markets (2), (3)
1,675
1,382
1,098
RBC Dexia IS (4)
759
558
500
Other (5)
(96
)
(135
)
104
Total
$
22,462
$
20,637
$
19,184
(1)
Includes cards and payment solutions.
(2)
Taxable equivalent basis.
(3)
Includes our National Clients business, which was transferred from our Other line of business
in the second quarter of 2007.
(4)
The amount for 2006 includes two months of revenue from IIS and our 50% proportionate
share of nine months of revenue from RBC Dexia IS for the year ended October 31, 2006.
Comparative amounts for 2005 only represent revenue from IIS.
(5)
Consists of Global Credit and Research business, and includes the tax equivalent basis
adjustment which is discussed below.
Changes in 2007
Composition of business segments
Effective February 7, 2007, our previous three business segments (RBC Canadian Personal and
Business, RBC U.S. and International Personal and Business, and RBC Capital Markets) were
reorganized into the following four business segments:
Canadian Banking comprises our domestic, personal and business banking operations, certain
retail investment businesses and our global insurance operations.
Wealth Management comprises businesses that directly serve the growing wealth management needs
of affluent and high net worth clients in Canada, the U.S. and North
America, and businesses that provide asset management and
trust products through RBC and external partners.
U.S. & International Banking comprises our banking businesses outside Canada, including our
banking operations in the U.S. and the Caribbean. In addition, this segment includes our 50%
ownership in RBC Dexia IS.
Capital Markets comprises our global wholesale banking business segment, which provides a wide
range of corporate and investment banking, sales and trading, research and related products and
services to corporate, public sector and institutional clients in North America, and specialized
products and services in select global markets.
The comparative results have been revised to conform to our new basis of segment presentation.
All other enterprise level activities that are not allocated to these four business segments,
such as enterprise funding securitization, net funding associated with unattributed capital, and
consolidation adjustments, including the elimination of the taxable equivalent basis (teb) gross-up
amounts, are included in Corporate Support. Teb adjustments gross up Net interest income from
certain tax-advantaged sources (Canadian taxable corporate dividends) to their effective tax
equivalent value with the corresponding offset recorded in the provision for income taxes.
Management believes that these adjustments are necessary for Capital Markets to reflect how it is
managed. The use of the teb adjustments enhances the comparability of revenue across our taxable and
tax-advantaged sources. The use of teb adjustments and measures may not be comparable to similar
GAAP measures or similarly adjusted amounts at other financial institutions. The teb adjustment for
2007 was $332 million (2006 — $213 million, 2005 — $109 million).
During 2007, we also reclassified the following balances in reporting our business segments:
(i) certain amounts reported in Capital Markets from Interest income to Interest expense with no
impact on Net interest income; (ii) certain amounts related to interest settlements on swaps in
fair value hedge relationships from Non-interest income to Net interest income which had no impact
on the prior years’ results; (iii) certain deposits in Capital Markets and U.S. & International
Banking related to RBC Dexia IS in accordance with the business realignment that occurred in the
second quarter 2007; (iv) expenses related to internally developed software from Non-interest
expense — Other to the more specific Non-interest expense lines. Only Corporate Support was
impacted by this reclassification and there was no impact on total Non-interest expense; and (v)
certain amounts related to trustee services
within Canadian Banking have been reclassified from Non-interest income — Investment management and
custodial fees to Net interest income to reflect their nature. All comparative amounts have been
revised to reflect these reclassifications.
Visa Restructuring
In connection with the restructuring of Visa Inc., which was completed on October 3, 2007, RBC’s
membership interest in Visa Canada Association was exchanged for shares of Visa Inc., resulting in
a gain of $326 million ($269 million net of taxes). The gain, which is based on an independent
valuation of RBC’s shares in Visa Inc., is included in Canadian Banking’s Total revenue and
recorded in Non-interest income - Other in our Consolidated Statement of Income. The shares of Visa
Inc. are classified as Available-for-sale securities. Refer to Note 3.
Management reporting framework
Our management reporting framework is intended to measure the performance of each business segment
as if it was a stand-alone business and reflect the way that business segment is managed. This
approach ensures our business segments’ results reflect all relevant revenue and expenses
associated with the conduct of their business and depicts how management views those results. These
items do not impact our consolidated results.
The expenses in each business segment may include costs or services directly incurred or
provided on their behalf at the enterprise level. For other costs not directly attributable to one
of our business segments, we use a management reporting framework that uses assumptions, estimates
and methodologies for allocating overhead costs and indirect expenses to our business segments and
that assists in the attribution of capital and the transfer pricing of funds to our business
segments in a manner that fairly and consistently measures and aligns the economic costs with the
underlying benefits and risks of that specific business segment. Activities and business conducted
between our business segments are generally at market rates. All other enterprise level activities
that are not allocated to our four business segments are reported under Corporate Support.
Our assumptions and methodologies used in our management reporting framework are periodically
reviewed by management to ensure they remain valid. The capital attribution methodologies involve a
number of assumptions and estimates that are revised periodically.
Geographic segments
For geographic reporting, our segments are grouped into Canada, United States and Other
International. Transactions are primarily recorded in the location that best reflects the risk due
to negative changes in economic conditions, and prospects for growth due to positive economic
changes. This location frequently corresponds with the location of the legal entity through which
the business is conducted and the location of our clients. Transactions are recorded in the local
currency and are subject to foreign exchange rate fluctuations with respect to the movement in the
Canadian dollar.
Royal Bank of Canada: Annual Report 2007
162 Consolidated Financial Statements
NOTE 31 RECONCILIATION OF THE APPLICATION OF CANADIAN AND UNITED STATES GENERALLY ACCEPTED ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLES
Our Consolidated Financial Statements are prepared in accordance with Subsection 308 of the
Bank Act (Canada), which states that except as otherwise specified by the OSFI, our Consolidated
Financial Statements are to be prepared in accordance with Canadian GAAP. As required by the U.S.
Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), material differences
between Canadian and U.S. GAAP are quantified and described below. We adopted SEC Staff Accounting
Bulletin No. 108 on November 1, 2006. Refer to the discussion under the Significant accounting
changes section later in this note.
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
2007
2006
Canadian GAAP
Differences
U.S. GAAP
Canadian GAAP
Differences
U.S. GAAP
Assets
Cash and due from banks
$
4,226
$
(78
)
$
4,148
$
4,401
$
(101
)
$
4,300
Interest-bearing deposits with banks
11,881
(4,436
)
7,445
10,502
(4,223
)
6,279
Securities
Trading
148,246
(5,348
)
142,898
147,237
(282
)
146,955
Available-for-sale
30,009
6,326
36,335
—
—
—
Investments
—
—
—
37,632
(97
)
37,535
178,255
978
179,233
184,869
(379
)
184,490
Assets purchased under reverse repurchase
agreements
and securities borrowed
64,313
(2,263
)
62,050
59,378
(2,148
)
57,230
Loans (net of allowance for loan losses)
237,936
(2,188
)
235,748
208,530
(111
)
208,419
Other
Customers’ liability under acceptances
11,786
—
11,786
9,108
—
9,108
Derivatives
66,585
(295
)
66,290
37,729
717
38,446
Premises and equipment, net
2,131
(102
)
2,029
1,818
(86
)
1,732
Goodwill
4,752
(61
)
4,691
4,304
(61
)
4,243
Other intangibles
628
(180
)
448
642
(211
)
431
Reinsurance recoverables
—
1,140
1,140
—
1,182
1,182
Separate account assets
—
114
114
—
111
111
Assets of operations held for sale
—
—
—
82
—
82
Other assets
17,853
30,590
48,443
15,417
24,893
40,310
103,735
31,206
134,941
69,100
26,545
95,645
$
600,346
$
23,219
$
623,565
$
536,780
$
19,583
$
556,363
Liabilities and shareholders’ equity
Deposits
$
365,205
$
(12,276
)
$
352,929
$
343,523
$
(9,466
)
$
334,057
Other
Acceptances
11,786
—
11,786
9,108
—
9,108
Obligations related to securities sold short
44,689
829
45,518
38,252
(1,188
)
37,064
Obligations related to assets sold under
repurchase agreements and securities loaned
37,033
(1,290
)
35,743
41,103
(1,141
)
39,962
Derivatives
72,010
(312
)
71,698
42,094
312
42,406
Insurance claims and policy benefit liabilities
7,283
2,530
9,813
7,337
2,686
10,023
Separate account liabilities
—
114
114
—
111
111
Liabilities of operations held for sale
—
—
—
32
—
32
Other liabilities
28,483
33,712
62,195
22,649
27,877
50,526
201,284
35,583
236,867
160,575
28,657
189,232
Subordinated debentures
6,235
6
6,241
7,103
300
7,403
Trust capital securities
1,400
(1,400
)
—
1,383
(1,383
)
—
Preferred share liabilities
300
(300
)
—
298
(298
)
—
Non-controlling interest in subsidiaries
1,483
1,405
2,888
1,775
1,083
2,858
Shareholders’ equity (1)
24,439
201
24,640
22,123
690
22,813
$
600,346
$
23,219
$
623,565
$
536,780
$
19,583
$
556,363
(1)
Included in our consolidated earnings as at October 31,2007 was $407 million (2006 - $293 million)
of undistributed earnings of our joint ventures and investments accounted for using
the equity method under U.S. GAAP.
Royal Bank of Canada: Annual Report 2007
Consolidated Financial Statements 163
NOTE 31 RECONCILIATION OF THE APPLICATION OF CANADIAN AND UNITED STATES GENERALLY ACCEPTED ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLES (continued)
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income
2007
2006
2005
Net income from continuing operations, Canadian GAAP
$
5,492
$
4,757
$
3,437
Differences:
Net interest income
Derivative instruments and hedging activities
(17
)
(22
)
36
Joint ventures
(115
)
(75
)
—
Liabilities and equity
115
115
115
Non-interest income
Insurance accounting
(202
)
(544
)
(606
)
Derivative instruments and hedging activities
56
(31
)
11
Reclassification of financial instruments (1)
9
14
27
Variable interest entities
4
(10
)
—
Limited partnerships
60
(3
)
(9
)
Joint ventures
(650
)
(458
)
(171
)
Reclassification of foreign currency translation
(41
)
(4
)
—
Other
(31
)
(29
)
(4
)
Provision for (recovery of) credit losses
Joint ventures
4
2
18
Other
(8
)
—
—
Insurance policyholder benefits, claims and acquisition expense
Insurance accounting
137
471
584
Non-interest expense
Stock appreciation rights
11
16
25
Insurance accounting
69
75
72
Joint ventures
653
440
118
Variable interest entities
2
2
—
Other
31
29
—
Income taxes and net difference in income taxes due to the above items
66
95
(13
)
Non-controlling interest in net income of subsidiaries
Variable interest entities
(6
)
8
—
Joint ventures
3
3
—
Liabilities and equity
(101
)
(101
)
(101
)
Net income from continuing operations, U.S. GAAP
$
5,541
$
4,750
$
3,539
Net loss from discontinued operations, Canadian GAAP (2)
$
—
$
(29
)
$
(50
)
Difference
— Other
—
—
5
Net loss from discontinued operations, U.S. GAAP (2)
$
—
$
(29
)
$
(45
)
Net income, U.S. GAAP
$
5,541
$
4,721
$
3,494
Basic
earnings per share (3)
Canadian GAAP
$
4.24
$
3.65
$
2.61
U.S. GAAP
$
4.26
$
3.62
$
2.67
Basic earnings per share from continuing operations
Canadian GAAP
$
4.24
$
3.67
$
2.65
U.S. GAAP
$
4.26
$
3.64
$
2.71
Basic
earnings (loss) per share from discontinued operations (2)
Canadian GAAP
$
—
$
(.02
)
$
(.04
)
U.S. GAAP
$
—
$
(.02
)
$
(.04
)
Diluted
earnings per share (3)
Canadian GAAP
$
4.19
$
3.59
$
2.57
U.S. GAAP
$
4.21
$
3.57
$
2.63
Diluted earnings per share from continuing operations
Canadian GAAP
$
4.19
$
3.61
$
2.61
U.S. GAAP
$
4.21
$
3.59
$
2.67
Diluted
earnings (loss) per share from discontinued operations (2)
Canadian GAAP
$
—
$
(.02
)
$
(.04
)
U.S. GAAP
$
—
$
(.02
)
$
(.04
)
(1)
Reclassification of financial instruments reflects differences in classification arising
from the use of the fair value option and reclassification of securities. Prior to the adoption of
the
new financial instruments accounting standards on November 1, 2006, this item reflected the reclassification of securities only. Please
refer to material differences between Canadian
and U.S. GAAP for details of this reclassification of securities.
(2)
Refer to Note 11.
(3)
The impact of calculating earnings per share using the two-class method reduced U.S. GAAP basic and diluted earnings per share for all periods presented by less than one cent. Please
refer to material differences between Canadian and U.S. GAAP for details of this two-class method.
Royal Bank of Canada: Annual Report 2007
164 Consolidated Financial Statements
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (1)
2007
2006
2005
Cash flows from (used in) operating activities, Canadian GAAP
$
19,473
$
(14,996
)
$
(29,527
)
U.S. GAAP adjustment for net income
49
(8
)
102
Adjustments to determine net cash from (used in) operating activities
Provision for credit losses
4
(2
)
(18
)
Depreciation
(24
)
(20
)
(4
)
Future income taxes
(416
)
271
(135
)
Amortization of other intangibles
(26
)
(20
)
—
Net gain on sale of investment securities
—
—
3
Changes in operating assets and liabilities
Insurance claims and policy benefit liabilities
(156
)
43
(438
)
Net change in accrued interest receivable and payable
293
(120
)
(1
)
Current income taxes
64
—
—
Derivative assets
1,012
440
41
Derivative liabilities
(624
)
(267
)
(90
)
Trading securities
(5,546
)
(695
)
(710
)
Reinsurance recoverable
(42
)
(8
)
(511
)
Net change in brokers and dealers receivable and payable
344
3,872
(2,504
)
Other
(437
)
2,446
2,099
Net cash from (used in) operating activities, U.S. GAAP
13,968
(9,064
)
(31,693
)
Cash flows from (used in) investing activities, Canadian GAAP
(36,690
)
(43,235
)
(7,727
)
Change in interest-bearing deposits with banks
213
4,191
48
Change in loans, net of loan securitizations
2,084
1,050
28
Proceeds from sale of investment securities
(7,565
)
(14,709
)
(25,628
)
Proceeds from maturity of investment securities
(18,784
)
(28,203
)
(18,405
)
Purchases of investment securities
24,097
38,474
36,373
Proceeds from sale of available-for-sale securities
7,565
14,727
25,651
Proceeds from maturity of available-for-sale securities
18,784
28,185
18,379
Purchases of available-for-sale securities
(19,964
)
(38,383
)
(36,130
)
Net acquisitions of premises and equipment
40
73
12
Change in assets purchased under reverse repurchase agreements and securities borrowed
115
2,148
—
Net cash from (used in) investing activities, U.S. GAAP
30,105
(35,682
)
(7,399
)
Cash flows from financing activities, Canadian GAAP
17,374
57,711
38,666
Change in deposits
(17,831
)
(36,663
)
(35,001
)
Change in deposits — Canada
(2,792
)
(299
)
15,522
Change in deposits — International
17,813
27,468
19,791
Issue of RBC Trust Capital Securities
—
—
(1,200
)
Issue of preferred shares
(16
)
(7
)
—
Redemption of preferred shares for cancellation
5
—
—
Issuance costs
11
7
3
Issue of common shares
(1
)
1
(1
)
Sales of treasury shares
3
—
—
Purchase of treasury shares
(1
)
(2
)
7
Dividends paid
(15
)
(13
)
(14
)
Change in obligations related to assets sold under repurchase agreements and securities loaned
(149
)
(1,141
)
—
Dividends/distributions paid by subsidiaries to non-controlling interests
(101
)
(102
)
(102
)
Change in obligations related to securities sold short
2,017
(2,835
)
2,837
Change in short-term borrowings of subsidiaries
—
—
(4
)
Net cash from financing activities, U.S. GAAP
$
16,317
$
44,125
$
40,504
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and due from banks
$
(332
)
$
(80
)
$
(122
)
Net change in cash and due from banks
(152
)
(701
)
1,290
Cash and due from banks at beginning of year
$
4,300
$
5,001
$
3,711
Cash and due from banks at end of year, U.S. GAAP
$
4,148
$
4,300
$
5,001
(1)
We did not have any discontinued operations during 2007.
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss), net of taxes (1)
2007
Canadian GAAP
Differences
U.S. GAAP
2006 (1)
2005 (1)
Transition adjustment
$
(45
)
$
45
$
—
$
—
$
—
Unrealized (losses) gains on available-for-sale securities
(65
)
133
68
191
83
Unrealized foreign currency translation gains (losses),
net of hedging activities
(3,207
)
(4
)
(3,211
)
(2,000
)
(1,768
)
Gains (losses) on derivatives designated as cash flow hedges
111
(91
)
20
(52
)
(165
)
Additional pension obligation
—
(541
)
(541
)
(62
)
(313
)
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of income taxes
$
(3,206
)
$
(458
)
$
(3,664
)
$
(1,923
)
$
(2,163
)
(1)
The concept of AOCI was introduced under Canadian GAAP upon the adoption of Section 1530
on November 1, 2006 (refer to Note 1). Accordingly, there is no reconciliation for the prior
periods presented.
Royal Bank of Canada: Annual Report 2007
Consolidated Financial Statements 165
Reclassification of (gains) losses on foreign currency translation
to income
(42
)
41
(1
)
6
5
Net foreign currency translation gains (losses) from hedging activities
1,804
—
1,804
269
401
Net gains (losses) on derivatives designated as cash flow hedges
80
1
81
(35
)
(97
)
Reclassification to income of (gains) losses on derivatives
designated as cash flow hedges
31
(5
)
26
148
124
Additional pension obligation
—
50
50
251
(246
)
Total comprehensive income
$
4,335
$
29
$
4,364
$
4,961
$
2,963
Income taxes (recovery) deducted from the above items:
Net unrealized gains (losses) on available-for-sale securities
$
(11
)
$
(37
)
$
(48
)
$
57
$
(55
)
Net foreign currency translation gains (losses), net of hedging activities
911
—
911
130
204
Net unrealized gains (losses) on derivatives designated as
cash flow hedges
43
—
43
(15
)
(51
)
Reclassification to income of (gains) losses on derivatives
designated as cash flow hedges
16
(3
)
13
75
66
Additional pension obligation
—
27
27
134
(132
)
Total income taxes (recovery)
$
959
$
(13
)
$
946
$
381
$
32
(1)
A new Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income was introduced under Canadian GAAP
upon adoption of Section 1530 on November 1, 2006 (refer to Note 1). Accordingly, there is no
reconciliation for the prior periods presented.
Material balance sheet reconciling items
The following tables present the increases or (decreases) in assets, liabilities and shareholders’
equity by material differences between Canadian
and U.S. GAAP:
Assets purchased under reverse
repurchase agreements and
securities borrowed
$
—
—
(2,262
)
—
(1
)
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
$
(2,263
)
Loans
$
—
—
(2,931
)
—
(18
)
—
—
—
—
—
—
717
44
$
(2,188
)
Other assets
$
(2
)
—
(4,818
)
2,967
873
220
(23
)
—
(202
)
13,995
18,106
—
90
$
31,206
Liabilities and shareholders’ equity
Deposits
$
(8
)
—
(12,277
)
—
13
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
(4
)
$
(12,276
)
Other liabilities
$
2
—
(2,594
)
2,728
(14
)
—
(60
)
(34
)
339
16,417
18,106
717
(24
)
$
35,583
Subordinated debentures
$
—
—
—
—
6
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
$
6
Trust capital securities
$
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
(1,400
)
—
—
—
—
—
$
(1,400
)
Preferred share liabilities
$
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
(300
)
—
—
—
—
—
$
(300
)
Non-controlling interest in subsidiaries
$
—
—
(29
)
—
—
—
—
1,434
—
—
—
—
—
$
1,405
Shareholders’ equity
$
4
—
—
239
(26
)
25
37
300
(541
)
—
—
—
163
$
201
(1)
Reclassification of financial instruments reflects differences in classification arising
from the use of the fair value option and reclassification of securities. Prior to the
adoption of the new financial instruments accounting standards on November 1, 2006, this
column reflected the reclassification of securities only. Refer to the material differences
between Canadian and U.S. GAAP for details of this reclassification of securities.
(2)
Other minor differences include cumulative translation adjustment of $41 million (2006 —
$4 million) and $8 million ($nil for 2006) related to loans held for sale which are
recorded at the lower of cost or market under U.S. GAAP and recorded at amortized cost
under Canadian GAAP.
Royal Bank of Canada: Annual Report 2007
166 Consolidated Financial Statements
Assets purchased under reverse repurchase
agreements and securities borrowed
$
—
—
(2,148
)
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
$
(2,148
)
Loans
$
41
—
(1,004
)
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
852
—
$
(111
)
Other assets
$
321
(2
)
(3,723
)
2,890
(128
)
164
(22
)
—
(25
)
10,401
16,558
—
111
$
26,545
Liabilities
and shareholders’ equity
Deposits
$
52
—
(9,518
)
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
$
(9,466
)
Other liabilities
$
(77
)
(39
)
(1,907
)
2,777
—
—
(58
)
(34
)
37
10,461
16,558
852
87
$
28,657
Subordinated debentures
$
300
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
$
300
Trust capital securities
$
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
(1,383
)
—
—
—
—
—
$
(1,383
)
Preferred share liabilities
$
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
(298
)
—
—
—
—
—
$
(298
)
Non-controlling interest in subsidiaries
$
—
(305
)
(29
)
—
—
—
—
1,417
—
—
—
—
—
$
1,083
Shareholders’ equity
$
54
—
—
113
241
(15
)
36
298
(62
)
—
—
—
25
$
690
(1)
Reclassification of financial instruments reflects differences in classification arising
from the use of the fair value option and reclassification of securities. Prior to the
adoption of the new financial instruments accounting standards on November 1, 2006, this
column reflected the reclassification of securities only. Refer to the material
differences between Canadian and U.S. GAAP for details of this reclassification of
securities.
Material differences between Canadian and U.S. GAAP
No.
Item
U.S. GAAP
Canadian GAAP
1
Variable interest
entities
We consolidate VIEs where we are the entity’s Primary
Beneficiary under Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) Interpretation No. 46, Consolidation of Variable
Interest Entities (FIN 46R). VIEs are entities in
which equity investors do not have the characteristics of a
controlling financial interest or do not have sufficient
equity at risk for the entity to finance its activities
without additional subordinated financial support from other
parties. The Primary Beneficiary is the party that has
exposure to a majority of the expected losses and/or expected
residual returns of the VIE.
The accounting for VIEs is consistent in all material
aspects with U.S. GAAP. In the second quarter of 2007, we
adopted EIC-163 which is substantially the same as FSP
FIN 46(R)-6. Refer to Note 1.
In the fourth quarter of 2006, we adopted FASB
Staff Position
FIN 46(R)-6, Determining the Variability to be Consolidated
in Applying FASB Interpretation No. 46(R) (FSP FIN 46(R)-6).
This guidance provides additional clarification on how to
analyze VIEs and their consolidation requirements.
Upon adoption of this guidance, we deconsolidated certain
investment funds.
2
Liabilities and
equity
Shares issued with conversion or conditional redemption
features are classified as equity. Shares that are mandatorily
redeemable because there is an unconditional obligation
requiring the issuer to redeem the instrument by transferring
its assets upon a specified date or upon an event that is certain to occur are classified as liabilities.
Financial instruments that can be settled by a variable
number of our common shares upon their conversion by
the holder are classified as liabilities under Canadian
GAAP. As a result, certain of our preferred shares and
TruCS are classified as liabilities. Dividends and yield
distributions on these instruments are included in
Interest expense in our Consolidated Statements of Income.
3
Derivative
instruments and
hedging activities
All derivatives are recorded on our Consolidated Balance
Sheets at fair value, including certain derivatives embedded within hybrid instruments. For derivatives that do not
qualify for hedge accounting, changes in their fair value are
recorded in Non-interest income. For derivatives that are designated and qualify as cash flow hedges, changes in fair value
related to the effective portion of the hedge are recorded in
AOCI within
Shareholders’ equity, and will be subsequently recognized in
Net interest income in the same period when the cash flow of
the hedged item affects earnings. The ineffective portion of the
hedge is reported in Non-interest income.
Prior to November 1, 2006, derivatives embedded
within hybrid instruments generally were not separately
accounted for except for those related to equity-linked
deposit contracts. For derivatives that did not qualify
for hedge accounting, changes in their fair value were
recorded in Non-interest income. Non-trading derivatives
where hedge accounting had not been applied upon adoption of Accounting Guideline 13, Hedging Relationships,
were recorded at fair value with transition gains or losses
being recognized in income as the original hedged item
affects Net interest income. Where derivatives had been
Royal Bank of Canada: Annual Report 2007
Consolidated Financial Statements 167
NOTE 31 RECONCILIATION OF THE APPLICATION OF CANADIAN AND UNITED STATES GENERALLY ACCEPTED ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLES (continued)
Material
differences between Canadian and U.S. GAAP (continued)
No.
Item
U.S. GAAP
Canadian GAAP
3
Derivative
instruments and hedging activities
(continued)
For derivatives
that are designated and qualify as fair value hedges, the carrying amount of the hedged item is adjusted
by gains or losses
attributable to the hedged risk and recorded in Non-interest
income. This change in fair value of the hedged item is generally offset by changes in the fair value of the derivative.
designated and qualified as effective hedges, they were
accounted for on an accrual basis with gains or losses
deferred and recognized over the life of the hedged assets
or liabilities as adjustments to Net interest income. The
ineffective portion of the hedge was not required to be
recognized. Upon the adoption of Section 3855 and Section 3865 on
November 1, 2006, Canadian GAAP is substantially harmonized
with U.S. GAAP. Refer to Note 1.
4
Joint ventures
Investments in joint ventures other than VIEs are accounted
for using the equity method.
Investments in joint ventures other than VIEs are proportionately consolidated.
5
Insurance
accounting
Fixed income and equity investments are included in
Available-for-sale securities and are carried at estimated fair
value. Unrealized gains and losses, net of income taxes, are
reported in AOCI within Shareholders’ equity. Realized gains
and losses are included in Non-interest income when realized.
Prior to November 1, 2006, fixed income and equity investments were classified as Investment account securities.
Fixed income investments were carried at amortized cost,
and equity investments at cost except for those that support life insurance
liabilities whose carrying values were
adjusted quarterly by 5% of the difference between market
value and previously adjusted carrying cost. Realized gains
and losses on disposal of fixed income investments that
support life insurance liabilities were deferred and
amortized to Non-interest income over the remaining term to
maturity of the investments sold to a maximum period of 20
years. Realized gains and losses on disposal of equity
investments were deferred and recognized as Non-interest
income at the quarterly rate of 5% of unamortized deferred
gains and losses.
Upon adoption of Section 3855 on November 1, 2006, fixed
income and equity securities are classified as
available-for-sale securities except for those supporting
the policy benefit liabilities of life and health insurance
contracts which are designated as held-for-trading using
the fair value option, as described in Note 1.
Insurance claims and policy benefit liabilities: Liabilities for
life insurance contracts, except universal life and investment-type contracts, are determined using the net level premium
method, which includes assumptions for mortality, morbidity,
policy lapses, surrenders, investment yields, policy dividends and direct operating expenses. These assumptions
are not revised unless it is determined that existing deferred
acquisition costs cannot be recovered. For universal life and
investment-type contracts, liabilities represent policyholder
account balances and include a net level premium reserve for
some contracts. The account balances represent an accumulation of gross deposits received plus credited interest less
withdrawals, expenses and mortality charges. Underlying reserve
assumptions of these contracts are subject to review at least
annually. Property and casualty claim liabilities represent the
estimated amounts required to settle all unpaid claims, and are
recorded on an undiscounted basis.
Insurance claims and policy benefit liabilities: Liabilities
for life insurance contracts are determined using the
Canadian Asset Liability Method, which incorporates
assumptions for mortality, morbidity, policy lapses,
surrenders, investment yields, policy dividends and maintenance expenses. To recognize the uncertainty in the
assumptions underlying the calculation of the liabilities, a
margin (provision for adverse deviations) is added to each
assumption. These assumptions are reviewed at least
annually and updated in response to actual experience
and market conditions. Property and casualty claim liabilities represent the estimated amounts required to settle all
unpaid claims, and are recorded on a discounted basis.
Royal Bank of Canada: Annual Report 2007
168 Consolidated Financial Statements
Material
differences between Canadian and U.S. GAAP (continued)
No.
Item
U.S. GAAP
Canadian GAAP
5
Insurance
accounting
(continued)
Insurance revenue: Amounts received for universal life and
other investment-type contracts are not included as revenue, but are reported as deposits to policyholders’ account
balances in Insurance claims and policy benefit liabilities.
Revenue from these contracts are limited to amounts assessed
against policyholders’ account balances for mortality, policy
administration and surrender charges, and are included in
Non-interest income when earned. Payments upon maturity or
surrender are reflected as reductions in the Insurance claims and
policy benefit liabilities.
Insurance revenue: Premiums for universal life and other
investment-type contracts are recorded as Non-interest
income, and a liability for future policy benefits is established
as a charge to Insurance policyholder benefits, claims and
acquisition expense.
Policy acquisition costs: Acquisition costs are deferred in
Other assets. The amortization method of the acquisition
costs is dependent on the product to which the costs are
related. For long-duration contracts, they are amortized in
proportion to premium revenue. For universal life and
investment-type contracts, amortization is based on a constant
percentage of estimated gross profits.
Policy acquisition costs: The costs of acquiring new life insurance and annuity business are implicitly recognized as a
reduction in Insurance claims and policy benefit liabilities.
Value of business acquired: The value of business acquired
(VOBA) is determined at the acquisition date and recorded as
an asset. The VOBA asset is amortized and charged to income
using the same methodologies used for policy acquisition cost
amortization but reflecting premiums or profit margins after the
date of acquisition only.
Value of business acquired: The value of life insurance in-force policies acquired in a business combination is implicitly
recognized as a reduction in policy benefit liabilities.
Reinsurance: Reinsurance recoverables are recorded as an
asset on our Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Reinsurance: Reinsurance recoverables of life insurance
business related to the risks ceded to other insurance or
reinsurance companies are recorded as an offset to Insurance
claims and policy benefit liabilities.
Separate accounts: Separate accounts are recognized on our
Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Separate accounts: Assets and liabilities of separate
accounts (known as segregated funds in Canada) are not
recognized on our Consolidated Balance Sheets.
6
Reclassification
of securities
and the
application of
the fair value
option
Securities are classified as Trading account or Available-for-sale, and are carried on our Consolidated Balance Sheets at
their estimated fair value. The net unrealized gain (loss) on
Available-for-sale securities, net of related income taxes, is
reported in AOCI within Shareholders’ equity except where
the Available-for-sale securities qualify as hedged items in
fair value hedges. These hedged unrealized gains (losses)
are recorded in Non-interest income where they are generally
offset by the changes in fair value of the hedging derivatives.
Writedowns to reflect other-than-temporary impairment in the
value of Available-for-sale securities are included in
Non-interest income.
Prior to November 1, 2006, securities were classified as
Trading account (carried at estimated fair value), Investment
account (carried at amortized cost) or Loan substitute.
Writedowns to reflect other-than-temporary impairments
in the value of Investment account securities were included
in Non-interest income. Loan substitute securities were
accorded the accounting treatment applicable to loans and,
if required, were reduced by an allowance.
On November 1, 2006, we adopted Financial Accounting
Standards Board (FASB) Statement No. 155, Accounting for
Certain Hybrid Financial Instruments — an amendment of
FASB Statements No. 133 and 140 (FAS 155). FAS 155 allows
an entity to measure any hybrid financial instrument that contains an embedded derivative that requires bifurcation at its
fair value, with changes in fair value recognized in earnings.
On November 1, 2006, we also adopted FASB Statement
No. 156, Accounting for Servicing of Financial Assets — an
amendment of FASB Statement No. 140 (FAS 156). Under
FAS 156, an entity is required to initially measure its servicing
rights at fair value and can elect to subsequently amortize
its initial fair value over the term of the servicing rights, or
remeasure them at fair value with changes recognized in
With the adoption of Section 3855 on November 1, 2006,
Canadian GAAP is substantially harmonized with U.S. GAAP.
The significant difference subsequent to the adoption of this
new Canadian standard primarily relates to the use of the fair
value option. As described in Note 1, Section 3855 allows the
designation of any financial instrument as held-for-trading on
its initial recognition or upon adoption of the new standard.
The fair value option can be applied to any financial instrument under Canadian GAAP (except for certain restrictions
imposed by the OSFI) whereas U.S. GAAP only allows the use
of the fair value option for servicing rights and certain hybrid
financial instruments. The principal categories of financial
instruments where we have applied the fair value option
under Canadian GAAP are described in Note 1.
Royal Bank of Canada: Annual Report 2007 Consolidated Financial Statements 169
NOTE 31 RECONCILIATION OF THE APPLICATION OF CANADIAN AND UNITED STATES GENERALLY ACCEPTED
ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLES (continued)
Material
differences between Canadian and U.S. GAAP (continued)
No.
Item
U.S. GAAP
Canadian GAAP
6
Reclassification of securities and the application of the fair value option (continued)
Net income. The ability to remeasure
servicing rights at fair value through Net income eliminates the accounting mismatch
between the servicing rights and the related derivatives that would otherwise
result in the absence of hedge accounting.
Upon adoption of FAS 155 and FAS 156,
certain hybrid financial instruments and servicing rights are measured at fair
value. The adoption of these standards did not materially impact our consolidated
financial position or results of operations.
7
Limited partnerships
The equity method is used to account for
investments in limited partnerships that are non-VIEs or unconsolidated VIEs, if we
own at least 3% of the total ownership interest.
We use the equity method to account
for investments in limited partnerships that are non-VIEs or
unconsolidated VIEs, if we have the ability to exercise significant
influence, generally indicated by an ownership interest of 20% or more.
8
Stock appreciation
rights (SARs)
Between November 29, 1999, and June 5,2001, grants of options under the employee stock option plan were accompanied with
tandem SARs, whereby participants could choose to exercise a SAR instead of the
corresponding option. In such cases, the participants would receive a cash payment
equal to the difference between the closing price of our common shares on the
day immediately preceding the day of exercise and the exercise price of the
option. For such a plan, compensation expense would be measured using estimates
based on past experience of participants exercising SARs rather than the
corresponding options.
For such a plan, a liability is recorded for the potential cash
payments to participants and compensation expense is measured assuming that all participants will
exercise SARs.
On November 1, 2005, we adopted FASB
Statement No. 123 (revised 2004)
Share-Based Payment (FAS 123(R)) and its
related FASB Staff Positions (FSPs)
prospectively for new awards and the
unvested portion of existing awards. FAS 123(R) requires that the compensation
expense should be measured assuming that
all participants will exercise SARs. Under
the transition guidelines of the new
standard, the requirements of the new
accounting standard are applicable to
awards granted after the adoption of the
new standard. Since these SARs were
awarded prior to adoption of the new
accounting standard, these will continue
to be accounted for under the previous
accounting standard.
9
Pension and other
post- employment
obligations
On October 31, 2007, we adopted the
recognition requirements of FASB Statement
No. 158, Employers’ Accounting for Defined
Benefit Pension and Other Post-retirement
Plans-an amendment of FASB Statements
No. 87, 88, 106 and 132(R) (FAS 158), which
require an entity to: (i) recognize the
funded status of a benefit plan on the
balance sheet; and (ii) recognize in OCI
the existing unrecognized net actuarial
gains and losses, prior service costs
and credits, and net transitional assets
or obligations. The measurement
requirement of FAS 158, which requires an
entity to measure defined benefit plan
assets and obligations as at the year-end
date, will be effective for us
prospectively at the end of year 2009. The
impact of adopting FAS 158 is disclosed in
the Pensions and other post-employment
benefits section of this note.
Canadian GAAP does not have the same
requirements as FAS 158.
For a defined benefit plan, the plan
assets and the benefit obligations
may be measured as of a date not more
than three months prior to the year-end. We measure our benefit
obligations and pension plan assets
as at September 30 each year.
Prior to 2007, for defined benefit pension
plans, an unfunded accumulated benefit
obligation was recorded as an
Royal Bank of Canada: Annual Report 2007
170 Consolidated Financial Statements
Material
differences between Canadian and U.S. GAAP (continued)
No.
Item
U.S. GAAP
Canadian GAAP
9
Pension and other
post- employment
obligations
(continued)
additional minimum pension liability, an
intangible asset was recorded up to the
amount of unrecognized prior service cost,
and the excess of unfunded accumulated
benefit obligation over unrecognized prior
service cost was recorded as a reduction in
Other comprehensive income.
10
Trade date
accounting
For securities transactions, trade date
basis of accounting is used for both our
Consolidated Balance Sheets and our
Consolidated Statements of Income.
For securities transactions, settlement date
basis of accounting is used for our
Consolidated Balance Sheets whereas trade date
basis of accounting is used for our
Consolidated Statements of Income.
11
Non-cash collateral
Non-cash collateral received in securities
lending transactions is recorded on our
Consolidated Balance Sheets as an asset and
a corresponding obligation to return it is
recorded as a liability, if we have the
ability to sell or repledge it.
Non-cash collateral received in securities
lending transactions is not recognized on our
Consolidated Balance Sheets.
12
Right of offset
When financial assets and liabilities are
subject to a legally enforceable right of
offset and we intend to settle these assets
and liabilities with the same party either
on a net basis or simultaneously, the
financial assets and liabilities may be
presented on a net basis.
Net presentation of financial assets and
liabilities is required when the same criteria
under U.S. GAAP are met. In addition, the
netting criteria may be applied to a tri-party
transaction.
13
Guarantees
For guarantees issued or modified after
December 31, 2002, a liability is recognized
at the inception of a guarantee, for the
fair value of the obligation undertaken in
issuing the guarantee.
Prior to November 1, 2006, Canadian GAAP only
provides for disclosure requirements. Upon the
adoption of Section 3855 on November 1, 2006,
Canadian GAAP is substantially harmonized with
U.S. GAAP.
14
Loan commitments
For loan commitments entered into after
March 31, 2004 and issued for loans that
will be held for sale when funded, revenue
associated with servicing assets embedded in
these commitments should be recognized only
when the servicing asset has been
contractually separated from the underlying
loans.
Upon adoption of Section 3855, loan
commitments that can be settled net or when
there is a past practice of selling the assets
resulting from the loan commitments shortly
after origination can be treated as
derivatives and such treatment applies to all
loan commitments in the same class.
In addition, loan commitments can be
designated as held-for-trading on their
initial recognition or upon adoption of the
new standard using the fair value option
(refer to Item No. 6 above).
15
Two-class method of
calculating
earnings per share
When calculating earnings per share, we are
required to give effect to securities or
other instruments or contracts that entitle
their holders to participate in
undistributed earnings when such entitlement
is nondiscretionary and objectively
determinable.
Canadian GAAP does not have such a requirement.
16
Income taxes
In addition to the tax impact of the
differences outlined above, the effects of
changes in tax rates on deferred income
taxes are recorded when the tax rate change
has been passed into law.
These effects are recorded when the tax rate
change has been substantively enacted.
Royal Bank of Canada: Annual Report 2007
Consolidated Financial Statements 171
NOTE 31 RECONCILIATION OF THE APPLICATION OF CANADIAN AND UNITED STATES GENERALLY ACCEPTED ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLES (continued)
Restricted net assets
Certain of our subsidiaries and joint ventures are subject to regulatory requirements of the
jurisdictions in which they operate. When these subsidiaries and joint ventures are subject to such
requirements, they may be restricted from transferring to us our share of their assets in the form
of cash dividends, loans or advances. At October 31, 2007, restricted net assets of these
subsidiaries were $10.3 billion (2006 — $7.1 billion).
Pensions and other post-employment benefits
The following information on our defined benefit plans is in addition to that disclosed in Note 20.
On October 31, 2007, we adopted the recognition and disclosure provisions of FAS 158 which
require the recognition of a plan’s over-funded or under-funded status as an asset or liability
with an offsetting adjustment to AOCI net of tax. The adjustments to AOCI at adoption represent the
net actuarial gains and losses, prior service costs or credits, and transitional assets or
obligations that were
previously unrecognized. These amounts will be subsequently
recognized as pension cost as they are amortized over the expected average remaining service life of employee groups
covered by the plans. Further, actuarial gains and losses that arise in subsequent periods and are
not recognized as pension cost in the same periods will be recognized as a component
of OCI. These amounts will be subsequently recognized as a component
of pension cost
on the same basis as the amounts recognized in AOCI on adoption of FAS 158.
The incremental effects of adopting the provisions of FAS 158 on our Consolidated Balance
Sheet at October 31, 2007 are presented in the following table, including the effect of recognizing
the additional minimum liability of $30 million prior to adopting FAS 158. The incremental effects
of adopting the provision of FAS 158 on our Consolidated Balance Sheet at October 31, 2007 had no
effect on our Consolidated Statement of Income for the year ended October 31, 2007, or for any year
presented.
2007
Before application
After application
of FAS 158
Adjustments
of FAS 158
Other assets
Prepaid pension benefit cost (1)
$
578
$
(479
)
$
99
Other liabilities
Accrued pension and other post-employment benefit expense (2)
1,262
330
1,592
Accumulated other comprehensive loss (3)
$
18
$
809
$
827
(1)
Includes the reversal of $12 million unrecognized prior service costs reported as
intangible asset.
(2)
Includes the reversal of the additional minimum liability adjustment of $30 million.
(3)
Includes employee benefit plan adjustments of $549 million, net of tax, and the reversal of the
additional minimum liability adjustment of $20 million, net of tax.
The under-funded status of the pension plans and other post-employment plans of $52
million and $1,441 million, respectively, are recognized on our Consolidated Balance Sheet in Other
liabilities. The accumulated benefit obligations for the pension plans is $6,299 million at October31, 2007 (2006 — $6,277 million).
The pre-tax amounts included in AOCI at October 31, 2007 are as follows:
2007
Other post-
Pension plans
employment plans
Total
Net actuarial loss
$
484
$
564
$
1,048
Prior service cost (benefit)
95
(307
)
(212
)
Transitional (asset) obligation
(10
)
1
(9
)
Pre-tax amount recognized in Accumulated other comprehensive loss (1)
$
569
$
258
$
827
(1)
Amount recognized in AOCI, net of tax is $541 million.
Royal Bank of Canada: Annual Report 2007
172 Consolidated Financial Statement
The estimated net actuarial loss and prior service cost for the pension plans that will be
amortized from AOCI, on a pre-tax basis, into pension expense during 2008 are $94 million and $22
million, respectively, and pension expense will be reduced by $2 million relating to the
amortization of transitional assets. The estimated net actuarial loss and transitional obligation
for the Other post-employment plans that will be amortized from AOCI, on a pre-tax basis, into
pension expense during 2008 are $37 million and $nil, respectively, and pension expense will be
reduced by $23 million relating to the amortization of prior service benefit.
Hedging activities
Upon adoption of Section 3855 and Section 3865 on November 1, 2006, Canadian GAAP is substantially
harmonized with U.S. GAAP. The criteria in applying hedge accounting and the accounting for each of
the permitted hedging strategies are described in Note 1.
Prior to November 1, 2006, there were material differences between Canadian and U.S. GAAP and
such differences are quantified as follows:
Fair value hedge
For the year ended October 31, 2006, the ineffective portion recognized in Non-interest income
amounted to a net unrealized gain of $11 million (2005 — $4 million). All components of each
derivative’s change in fair value have been included in the assessment of fair value hedge
effectiveness. We did not hedge any firm commitments for the year ended October 31, 2006.
Cash flow hedge
For the year ended October 31, 2006, a net unrealized gain of $1 million (2005 — $97 million loss)
was recorded in OCI for the effective portion of changes in fair value of derivatives designated as
cash flow hedges. The amounts recognized in OCI are reclassified to Net interest income in the
periods in which Net interest income is affected by the variability in cash flows of the hedged
item. A net loss of $108 million (2005 — $124 million loss) was reclassified to Net income during
the year. A net loss of $26 million (2005 — $111 million loss) deferred in AOCI as at October 31,2006, is expected to be reclassified to Net income during the next 12 months.
For the year ended October 31, 2006, a net unrealized loss of $23 million (2005 — $3 million
loss) was recognized in Non-interest income for the ineffective portion of cash flow hedges. All
components of each derivative’s change in fair value have been included in the assessment of cash
flow hedge effectiveness. We did not hedge any forecasted transactions for the year ended October31, 2006.
Hedges of net investments in foreign operations
For the year ended October 31, 2006, we experienced
foreign currency losses of $507 million (2005 — $623 million) related to our net investments in
foreign operations, which were offset by gains of $269 million (2005 — $401 million) related to
derivative and non-derivative instruments designated as hedges for such foreign currency exposures.
The net foreign currency gains (losses) are recorded as a component of OCI.
Average assets, U.S. GAAP
2007
2006
2005
Average
% of total
Average
% of total
Average
% of total
assets
average assets
assets
average assets
assets
average assets
Canada
$
338,545
56
%
$
297,740
57
%
$
277,442
58
%
United States
139,569
23
%
119,614
23
%
97,002
20
%
Other International
125,743
21
%
104,533
20
%
101,961
22
%
$
603,857
100
%
$
521,887
100
%
$
476,405
100
%
Significant accounting changes
Guidance for quantifying financial statement misstatements
In September 2006, the SEC issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 108, Considering the
Effects of Prior Year Misstatements when Quantifying Misstatements in Current Year Financial
Statements (SAB 108). It provides guidance on how to evaluate prior period financial statement
misstatements for the purpose of assessing their materiality in the current period. SAB 108
requires registrants to evaluate the materiality of identified adjusted errors using both of the
follow methods: the “rollover” approach, which quantifies errors based on the amount of the errors
originating in the current-year income statement without considering the effects of correcting the
portion of the current-year balance sheet for misstatements that originated in prior years, and the
“iron curtain” approach, which quantifies an error based on the effects of correcting the
misstatement existing in the balance sheet at the end of the current year, irrespective of when it
arose. SAB 108 permits companies to adjust for the cumulative effect of errors that the company
previously determined to be immaterial by adjusting the carrying amount of assets and liabilities
as of the beginning of the current year, with an offsetting adjustment to the opening balance of
retained earnings.
We adopted SAB 108 on November 1, 2006, and reduced our opening retained earnings and AOCI by
$42 million and $35 million, respectively, and increased other liabilities by $77 million. These
adjustments pertain to errors that arose between 2001 and 2006 when certain criteria were not met in
order for hedge accounting to be achieved. We previously deemed these errors to be immaterial to
our Consolidated Financial Statements using the rollover method.
Future accounting changes
Guidance on accounting for income taxes
FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for
Uncertainty in Income Taxes — an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109 (FIN 48), on July 13,2006, and its related Staff Position FIN 48-1, Definition of Settlement in FASB Interpretation No.
48 (FSP FIN 48-1), on May 2, 2007. FIN 48 and FSP FIN 48-1 provide additional guidance on how to
recognize, measure and disclose income tax benefits. The cumulative effect of applying the
provisions of FIN 48 will be reported as an adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings.
FIN 48 became effective for us on November 1, 2007, and is not expected to materially impact our
consolidated financial position and results of operations.
Accounting for deferred acquisition costs for insurance operations
On September 19, 2005, the
Accounting Standards Executive Committee of the American Institute of
Certified Public Accountants
(AICPA) issued Statement of Position (SOP) 05-1, Accounting by Insurance Enterprises for Deferred
Acquisition Costs in Connection with Modifications or Exchanges of Insurance Contracts (SOP 05-1).
SOP 05-1 provides guidance on accounting for deferred acquisition costs on internal replacements of
insurance and investment contracts other than those specifically described in FASB Statement No. 97,
Accounting and Reporting by Insurance Enterprises for Certain Long-Duration Contracts and for
Realized Gains and Losses from the Sale of Investments. SOP 05-1
defines an internal replacement as
a modification in product benefits, features, rights or coverages that occurs by the exchange of a
contract for a new contract, by amendment or endorsement, rider to a contract, or by the election
of a feature or coverage within a contract. A replacement contract
that is substantially
Royal Bank of Canada: Annual Report
2007
Consolidated Financial Statements 173
NOTE 31 RECONCILIATION OF THE APPLICATION OF CANADIAN AND UNITED STATES GENERALLY ACCEPTED ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLES (continued)
changed from the replaced contract is accounted for as an extinguishment of the
replaced contract, resulting in the unamortized deferred acquisition costs, unearned revenue
liabilities, and deferred sales inducement assets from extinguished contracts being expensed. This
SOP became effective for us on November 1, 2007 on a prospective basis, and is not expected to
materially impact our consolidated financial position and results of operations.
Guidance for written loan commitments recorded at fair value through earnings
On November 5, 2007, the SEC issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 109, Written Loan Commitments
Recorded at Fair Value Through Earnings (SAB 109). It requires that the expected net future cash
flows related to the associated servicing of the loan should be included in the measurement of all
written loan commitments that are accounted for at fair value through earnings. In addition,
internally developed intangible assets should not be recorded as part of the fair value of a
derivative loan commitment. SAB 109 is effective for us on February 1, 2008. We are currently
assessing the impact that this SAB will have on our consolidated financial position and results of
operations.
Framework on fair value measurement
On September 15, 2006, FASB issued FASB Statement No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (FAS 157), which
establishes a framework for measuring fair value in U.S. GAAP, and is applicable to other
accounting pronouncements where fair value is considered to be the relevant measurement attribute.
FAS 157 also expands disclosures about fair value measurements and will be effective for us on
November 1, 2008. We are currently assessing the impact of adopting this standard on our
consolidated financial position and results of operations.
Fair
value option for financial assets and liabilities
On February 15, 2007, FASB issued Statement
No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Liabilities (FAS 159). FAS 159 provides an
entity the option to report selected financial assets and liabilities at fair value and establishes
new disclosure requirements for assets and liabilities to which the fair value option is applied.
FAS 159 will be effective for us on November 1, 2008. We are currently assessing the impact of
adopting this standard on our consolidated financial position and results of operations.
Offsetting of amounts related to certain contracts
On April 30, 2007, FASB issued a Staff Position
FIN 39-1, Amendment of FASB Interpretation No. 39 (FSP FIN 39-1), which amends certain aspects of
FIN 39, Offsetting of Amounts Related to Certain Contracts, to permit a reporting entity to offset
fair value amounts recognized for the right to reclaim cash collateral (a receivable) or the
obligation to return cash collateral (a payable) against fair value amounts recognized for
derivative instruments executed with the same counterparty under the same master netting agreement.
FSP FIN 39-1 will be effective for us on November 1, 2008. We are currently assessing the impact of
adopting this standard on our consolidated financial position and results of operations.
Income
tax benefits of dividends on share-based payment awards
At the June 27, 2007 meeting, the
FASB ratified the consensus reached by the Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) on Issue 06-11,
Accounting for Income Tax Benefits of Dividends on Share-Based Payment Awards (EITF 06-11), on
realized tax benefits on dividend payments related to certain share-based payment arrangements which
can be treated as deductible compensation expense for income tax purposes. Under EITF 06-11, a
realized tax benefit from dividends or dividend equivalents that are charged to retained earnings
and paid to employees for equity-classified non-vested equity shares, non-vested equity share units,
and outstanding share options should be recognized as an increase to additional paid-in capital
(APIC). Those tax benefits are considered excess tax benefits (“windfall”) under FAS 123(R). The EITF
also reached a final consensus that if an entity’s estimate of forfeitures increases (resulting in
compensation expense), the amount of associated tax benefits that are
reclassified from APIC to the
income statement should be limited to the entity’s pool of
excess tax benefits. This EITF will be
effective for us on November 1, 2008. We are currently assessing the impact of adopting this
standard on our consolidated financial position and results of operations.
Royal Bank of Canada: Annual Report 2007
174 Consolidated Financial Statement
The following table presents information regarding the legal entity of Royal Bank of Canada
with its subsidiaries presented on an equity accounted basis:
Condensed Balance Sheets
2007
2006
Assets
Cash and due from banks
$
2,992
$
2,924
Interest-bearing deposits with banks
5,154
2,920
Securities
94,603
90,076
Investments in bank subsidiaries and associated corporations
12,151
10,345
Investments in other subsidiaries and associated corporations
22,347
21,830
Assets purchased under reverse repurchase agreements
10,609
9,221
Loans, net of allowances
196,414
166,528
Net balances due from bank subsidiaries
18,194
24,750
Net balances due from other subsidiaries
9,078
10,845
Other assets
86,502
54,545
$
458,044
$
393,984
Liabilities and shareholders’ equity
Deposits
$
306,123
$
285,898
Other liabilities
121,065
78,699
$
427,188
$
364,597
Subordinated debentures
$
6,117
$
6,966
Preferred share liabilities
300
298
Shareholders’ equity
24,439
22,123
$
458,044
$
393,984
Condensed Statements of Income
2007
2006
2005
Interest income (1)
$
17,563
$
14,007
$
11,616
Interest expense
12,940
10,351
6,867
Net interest income
4,623
3,656
4,749
Non-interest income (2)
4,408
3,935
3,412
Total revenue
9,031
7,591
8,161
Provision for credit losses
702
410
392
Non-interest expense
5,905
5,720
6,001
Business realignment charges
—
2
44
Income from continuing operations before income taxes
2,424
1,459
1,724
Income taxes
454
424
528
Net income before equity in undistributed income of subsidiaries
1,970
1,035
1,196
Equity in undistributed income of subsidiaries (3)
3,522
3,693
2,191
Net income
$
5,492
$
4,728
$
3,387
(1)
Includes dividend income from investments in subsidiaries and associated corporations of $420
million, $17 million and $20 million for 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
(2)
Includes income from associated corporations of $4 million, $8 million and $49 million for
2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
(3)
Includes net loss from discontinued operations related to RBC Mortgage of $29 million
and $50 million for 2006 and 2005, respectively. Refer to Note
11.
Royal Bank of Canada: Annual Report 2007
Consolidated Financial Statements 175
Management’s discussion and analysis (MD&A) is provided to enable a reader to assess our results of
operations and financial condition for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2007, compared to the
preceding two years. This MD&A should be read in conjunction with our Consolidated Financial
Statements and related notes and is dated November 29, 2007. All amounts are in Canadian dollars,
unless otherwise specified, and are based on financial statements prepared in accordance with
Canadian generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). Effective October 31, 2006, RBC Mortgage
Company disposed of substantially all of its remaining assets and obligations and we no longer
separately classify its results in our Consolidated Financial Statements. Results reported on a
total consolidated basis are comparable to results reported from continuing operations for the
corresponding prior periods.
Additional information about us, including our 2007 Annual Information Form, is available free of
charge on our website at rbc.com/investorrelations, on the Canadian Securities Administrators’
website at sedar.com and on the EDGAR section of the United States Securities and Exchange
Commission’s (SEC) website at sec.gov.
34
Overview
34
About Royal Bank of Canada
34
Vision and strategic goals
35
Selected financial and other highlights
36
Overview of 2007
38
Outlook and objectives for 2008
38
Accounting and control matters
38
Critical accounting policies and estimates
42
Future changes in accounting policies
42
Controls and procedures
43
Financial performance
43
Overview
45
Total revenue
46
Net interest income and margin
47
Change in net interest income
47
Non-interest expense
48
Provision for credit losses
48
Insurance policyholder benefits, claims
and acquisition expense
49
Taxes
50
Results by geographic segment
50
Related party transactions
51
Quarterly financial information
51
Results and trend analysis
52
Fourth quarter 2007 performance
53
Business segment results
54
How we measure and report our business segments
55
Impact of foreign exchange rates on our business segments
55
Key performance and non-GAAP
measures
57
Canadian Banking
61
Wealth Management
64
U.S. & International Banking
67
Capital Markets
70
Corporate Support
71
Financial condition
71
Balance sheet
71
Capital management
77
Off-balance sheet arrangements
80
Risk management
83
Overview
83
Credit risk
92
Market risk
95
Operational risk
96
Liquidity and funding risk
99
Reputation risk
99
Regulatory and legal risk
100
Environmental risk
101
Insurance risk
101
Strategic risk
102
Competitive risk
102
Systemic risk
102
Additional risks that may affect future results
104
Additional financial information
See our Glossary for definitions of terms used throughout this document
Caution regarding forward-looking statements
From time to time, we make written or oral forward-looking statements within the meaning of certain
securities laws, including the “safe harbour” provisions of the United States Private Securities
Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and any applicable Canadian securities legislation. We may make
forward-looking statements in this document, in other filings with Canadian regulators or the United
States Securities and Exchange Commission, in reports to shareholders and in other
communications. Forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements relating to
our medium-term and 2008 objectives, our strategic goals and priorities and the economic and
business outlook for us, for each of our business segments and for the Canadian, United States and
international economies. Forward-looking statements are typically identified by words such as
“believe,”“expect,”“forecast,”“anticipate,”“intend,”“estimate,”“plan” and “project” and
similar expressions of future or conditional verbs such as “will,”“may,”“should,”“could,” or
“would.”
By their very nature, forward-looking statements require us to make assumptions and are
subject to inherent risks and uncertainties, which give rise to the possibility that our
predictions, forecasts, projections, expectations or conclusions will not prove to be accurate,
that our assumptions may not be correct and that our objectives, strategic goals and priorities
will not be achieved. We caution readers not to place undue reliance on these statements as a
number of important factors could cause our actual results to differ materially from the
expectations expressed in such forward-looking statements. These factors include credit, market,
operational, liquidity and funding risks, and other risks discussed in our 2007 management’s
discussion and analysis; general business and economic conditions in Canada, the United States and
other countries in which we conduct business, including the impact from the continuing volatility
in the U.S. subprime and related markets and lack of liquidity in various of the financial markets; the impact of the
movement of the Canadian dollar relative to other currencies, particularly the U.S. dollar, British
pound and Euro; the effects of changes in government monetary and other policies; the effects of
competition in the markets in which we operate; the impact of changes in laws and regulations; judicial or regulatory judgments and legal proceedings; the accuracy and
completeness of information concerning our clients and counterparties; our ability to successfully
execute our strategies and to complete and integrate strategic acquisitions and joint ventures
successfully; changes in accounting standards, policies and estimates, including changes in our
estimates of provisions and allowances; and our ability to attract and retain key employees and
executives.
We caution that the foregoing list of important factors is not exhaustive and other factors
could also adversely affect our results. When relying on our forward-looking statements to make
decisions with respect to us, investors and others should carefully consider the foregoing factors
and other uncertainties and potential events. Unless required by law, we do not undertake to update
any forward-looking statement, whether written or oral, that may be made from time to time by us or
on our behalf.
Additional information about these and other factors can be found under the Risk management
section that may affect future results section and the Additional risks that may affect future
results section.
Information contained in or otherwise accessible through the websites mentioned does not form part
of this document. All references in this document to websites are inactive textual references and
are for your information only.
Royal Bank of Canada: Annual Report 2007
Management’s Discussion and Analysis 33
Royal Bank of Canada (RY on TSX and NYSE) and its subsidiaries operate under the master
brand name of RBC. We are Canada’s largest bank as measured by assets and market capitalization and
one of North America’s leading diversified financial services companies. We provide personal and
commercial banking, wealth management services, insurance, corporate and investment banking and
transaction processing services on a global basis. We employ more than 70,000 full- and part-time
employees who serve more than 15 million personal, business, public sector and institutional
clients through offices in Canada, the U.S. and 36 other countries.
Effective February 7, 2007, our previous three business segments (RBC Canadian Personal and
Business, RBC U.S. and International Personal and Business, and RBC Capital Markets) were
reorganized into four business segments:
Canadian Banking comprises our domestic personal and business banking operations, certain
retail investment businesses and our global insurance operations.
Wealth Management comprises businesses that directly serve the growing wealth management needs
of affluent and high net worth clients in Canada, the U.S. and outside North America, and
businesses that provide asset management and trust products through RBC and external partners.
U.S. & International Banking comprises our banking businesses outside Canada, including our
banking operations in the U.S. and Caribbean. In addition, this segment includes our 50% ownership in RBC Dexia Investor Services (RBC
Dexia IS).
Capital Markets comprises our global wholesale banking business, which provides a wide range
of corporate and investment banking, sales and trading, research and related products and services
to corporations, public sector and institutional clients in North America, and specialized products
and services in select global markets.
Our business segments are supported by our Corporate Support team, which consists of Global
Technology and Operations (GTO) and Global Functions. GTO provides the operational and
technological foundation required to effectively deliver products and services to our clients. It
also leads innovative process and technology improvements intended to maintain the safety and
soundness of our operations, while keeping our capabilities ahead of the competition. Our Global
Functions team of professionals provides sound governance and advice in the areas of risk,
compliance, law, finance, tax and communications. This team also manages the capital, and liquidity
and funding positions of the enterprise to ensure that we meet regulatory requirements, while
ensuring effective funding management and allocation of capital. In addition, the Global Functions
team provides support to our people and manages relationships with external stakeholders, including
investors, credit rating agencies and regulators, as well as supports strategic business decisions.
Vision and strategic goals
Our business strategies and actions are guided by our vision of “Always earning the right to
be our clients’ first choice.” We believe that this client-focused approach to our business is
critical to achieving our strategic as well as our financial performance goals. Our Client First
philosophy is exhibited in all of our activities, including how we deal with our clients, develop
our products and services, and collaborate across businesses and functions. We maintain our focus
on enhancing client satisfaction and loyalty by continually striving to understand and meet the
evolving needs and expectations of our clients. We believe that pursuing our vision will generate
strong, stable revenue and earnings growth that will result in top quartile total shareholder
return compared to our North American peer group.
The Canadian market continues to provide us with significant avenues for growth in both the
retail and wholesale sectors. Our trusted brand, together with our broad expertise and leading
positions in diverse financial products and services, provides us with the foundation and resources
to expand internationally. The U.S., with its geographic proximity, cultural similarities and close
trade relationships with Canada, will continue to be a focus of future growth as we build on our
strong market positions in selected businesses. In addition, we will continue to expand outside
North America in markets where our experience and expertise provide us with the ability to compete
effectively.
For 2008, our strategic goals are to remain focused on growing our domestic franchise, while
continuing to expand internationally by leveraging our core capabilities and by building on our
portfolio of international businesses. We expect to achieve these goals by maintaining our focus on meeting the needs of clients through ongoing innovation and by collaborating effectively
across our many businesses and functions.
•
In Canada, our goal is to be the undisputed leader in financial services. We are
strengthening the RBC brand by delivering a superior client experience with a comprehensive
suite of quality financial products and services for all our clients. In banking, we continue
to leverage our extensive distribution capabilities to grow market share across products and
markets, while expanding and enhancing our distribution network to meet the needs of our
clients. We are also developing innovative solutions and simplifying processes for our clients
to make it easier for them to do business with us. In wealth management, we continue to extend
our lead in wealth and asset management markets and to attract and retain experienced
advisors. In capital markets, we continue to focus on maintaining our leadership position
across all businesses and remain our wholesale clients’ first choice for all financial
products and services.
•
In the United States, our goal is to build on our strengths in banking, wealth management and
capital markets. In banking, we are focused on meeting the needs of businesses, business
owners and professionals. We continue to expand our U.S. Southeast footprint in key
high-growth markets through targeted de novo branch openings and strategic acquisitions. In
wealth management, we continue to expand our business through organic
growth and strategic acquisitions, and provide our advisors with
Royal Bank of Canada: Annual Report 2007
34 Management’s Discussion and Analysis
customized support for investment, advisory and wealth management practices by utilizing our global
resources. In capital markets, we continue to deepen the penetration of our existing client base
through diverse product offerings and leveraging the strengths of recent acquisitions, and
enhancing our origination capabilities to expand our client base.
•
Outside North America, our
goal is to be a premier provider of selected financial services where our core capabilities and key
expertise provide us with competitive advantages. In banking, we intend to continue to build on our
strong position in the Caribbean through strategic acquisitions and organic growth, supported by
ongoing operational improvements, strengthening of client relationships and broadening of product
offerings. In wealth management, our strategy remains focused on increasing scale through expansion
in our chosen markets and recruiting relationship managers. We will continue to make targeted
acquisitions and enhance the breadth of our products and services, as well as
improve our relationship management model to capitalize on the growing demand for wealth
management products and services. In custody services, our joint venture, RBC Dexia IS, utilizes
its global scale and expanded product capability to grow the number of and deepen our client
relationships. In capital markets, we continue to expand our global distribution and extend our
capabilities in structuring and trading businesses, infrastructure finance and fixed income
origination.
Guided by our Client First philosophy and strategic goals, our business segments continue to tailor
their strategies to meet client needs and strengthen client relationships within their unique
operating and competitive environments. We believe that the successful execution of our business
strategies will enhance the quality and diversity of our earnings. These efforts should result in
the continued strong market leadership of our Canadian businesses as well as improved results and
solid growth in our U.S. and international businesses.
Selected financial and other highlights
Table 1
2007 vs. 2006
(C$ millions, except per share, number of and percentage amounts)
2007
2006
2005
Increase (decrease)
Total revenue
$
22,462
$
20,637
$
19,184
$
1,825
8.8
%
Non-interest expense
12,473
11,495
11,357
978
8.5
%
Provision for credit losses
791
429
455
362
84.4
%
Insurance policyholder benefits, claims and acquisition
expense
2,173
2,509
2,625
(336
)
(13.4
)%
Net income before income taxes and non-controlling
interest in subsidiaries
7,025
6,204
4,702
821
13.2
%
Net income from continuing operations
5,492
4,757
3,437
735
15.5
%
Net loss from discontinued operations
—
(29
)
(50
)
29
n.m.
Net income
$
5,492
$
4,728
$
3,387
$
764
16.2
%
Segments — net income
Canadian Banking
$
2,987
$
2,426
$
2,007
$
561
23.1
%
Wealth Management
762
604
502
158
26.2
%
U.S. & International Banking
242
261
256
(19
)
(7.3
)%
Capital Markets
1,292
1,355
686
(63
)
(4.6
)%
Corporate Support
209
111
(14
)
98
n.m.
Net income
$
5,492
$
4,757
$
3,437
$
735
15.5
%
Selected information
Earnings per share (EPS) — basic
$
4.24
$
3.65
$
2.61
$
.59
16.2
%
Earnings per share (EPS) — diluted
$
4.19
$
3.59
$
2.57
$
.60
16.7
%
Return on common equity (ROE) (1)
24.6
%
23.5
%
18.0
%
n.m.
110 bps
Return on risk capital (RORC) (2)
37.4
%
36.7
%
29.3
%
n.m.
70 bps
Net interest margin (3)
1.30
%
1.35
%
1.53
%
n.m.
n.m.
Capital ratios (4)
Tier 1 capital ratio
9.4
%
9.6
%
9.6
%
n.m.
(20) bps
Total capital ratio
11.5
%
11.9
%
13.1
%
n.m.
(40) bps
Selected balance sheet and other information
Total assets
$
600,346
$
536,780
$
469,521
$
63,566
11.8
%
Securities
178,255
184,869
160,495
(6,614
)
(3.6
)%
Retail loans
169,462
151,050
140,239
18,412
12.2
%
Wholesale loans
69,967
58,889
51,675
11,078
18.8
%
Deposits
365,205
343,523
306,860
21,682
6.3
%
Average common equity (1)
22,000
19,900
18,600
2,100
10.6
%
Average risk capital (2)
14,450
12,750
11,450
1,700
13.3
%
Risk-adjusted assets (4)
247,635
223,709
197,004
23,926
10.7
%
Assets under management
161,500
143,100
118,800
18,400
12.9
%
Assets under administration — RBC
548,200
525,800
1,778,200
22,400
4.3
%
— RBC Dexia IS (5)
2,713,100
2,421,100
—
292,000
12.1
%
Common share information
Shares outstanding (000s) — average basic
1,273,185
1,279,956
1,283,433
(6,771
)
(.5
)%
— average diluted
1,289,314
1,299,785
1,304,680
(10,471
)
(.8
)%
— end of period
1,276,260
1,280,890
1,293,502
(4,630
)
(.4
)%
Dividends declared per share
$
1.82
$
1.44
$
1.18
$
.38
26.4
%
Dividend yield
3.3
%
3.1
%
3.2
%
n.m.
20 bps
Common share price (RY on TSX) — close, end of period
$
56.04
$
49.80
$
41.67
$
6.24
12.5
%
Market capitalization (TSX)
71,522
63,788
53,894
7,734
12.1
%
Business information (number of)
Employees (full-time equivalent)
65,045
60,858
60,012
4,187
6.9
%
Bank branches
1,541
1,443
1,419
98
6.8
%
Automated teller machines
4,419
4,232
4,277
187
4.4
%
Period average US$ equivalent of C$1.00 (6)
$
.915
$
.883
$
.824
$
.03
4
%
Period-end US$ equivalent of C$1.00
1.059
.890
.847
.17
19
%
(1)
Average common equity and Return on common equity are calculated using month-end balances for
the period.
(2)
Average amounts are calculated using methods intended to approximate the average of the daily
balances for the period. For further discussion on Average risk capital and Return on risk
capital, refer to the Key performance and non-GAAP measures section.
(3)
Net interest margin (NIM) is calculated as Net interest income divided by Average assets.
Average assets are calculated using methods intended to approximate the average of the daily
balances for the period.
(4)
Calculated using guidelines issued by the Office of the Superintendent of Financial
Institutions Canada (OSFI).
(5)
Assets under administration — RBC Dexia IS represents the total Assets under administration
(AUA) of the joint venture as at September 30, 2007. We have revised the 2006 amount to
reflect the amount reported by RBC Dexia IS, as we had previously disclosed only the assets
under custody amount related to our joint venture.
(6)
Average amounts are calculated using
month-end spot rates for the period.
n.m.
not meaningful
Royal Bank of Canada: Annual Report 2007
Management’s Discussion and Analysis 35
We reported record net income of $5,492 million for the year ended October 31, 2007, up $764
million, or 16%, from a year ago. Diluted earnings per share (EPS) were $4.19, up 17% compared to a
year ago. ROE was 24.6%, compared to 23.5% a year ago. The Tier 1 capital ratio of 9.4% was down 20
basis points (bps) from 9.6% a year ago, while our Total capital ratio of 11.5% was down 40 bps
from 11.9% a year ago.
Executing
our initiatives
During the year, we continued to diversify our products and services, markets, and geographical
presence to generate strong and stable earnings growth. We remained focused on strengthening our
distribution capabilities and enhancing client satisfaction and loyalty, while seeking to deliver
top quartile total shareholder return versus our North American peer group.
In Canada, we continued to strengthen our leadership position in most major product categories
by enhancing the quality and breadth of our products and services, as well as expanding and
upgrading our distribution network to better serve our clients. We continued to be the leader in
the Canadian mutual fund industry in terms of net long-term sales and in most of our capital market
businesses. We also strengthened our leadership positions in most product categories, including
mortgages, credit cards and business loans and deposits. As part of our initiatives to meet client
needs and build enduring client relationships, we have expanded our distribution capabilities by
adding new bank branches, insurance offices and automated teller machines particularly in
high-growth markets, and have upgraded our branches. We launched new and innovative products,
including a high-interest online savings account and socially responsible mutual funds. We have
also continued to streamline sales, credit and back-office processes to make it easier for our
clients to do business with us. Our trusted brand, together with our leadership position in most
major product categories in Canada, continued to provide us with the foundation and resources to
expand internationally.
In the U.S., we continued to build scale and capability in all our major businesses through a
combination of organic growth and strategic acquisitions. To expand our banking capabilities
strategically in high-growth markets in the U.S. Southeast, we completed the acquisition of
Atlanta-based Flag Financial Corporation and 39 AmSouth Bank branches in Alabama. These
acquisitions, which complemented our de novo branch openings, have significantly expanded our
banking presence in the U.S. Southeast. We also announced an agreement (1) to acquire Alabama
National BanCorporation, the parent of 10 subsidiary banks and other affiliated businesses in
Alabama, Florida and Georgia, which will add another 103 branches and strengthen our retail
distribution by growing our footprint to over 450 locations
throughout high-growth southeastern
U.S. markets. We also expanded our investment banking and wealth management capabilities in the
U.S. We completed the acquisition of Carlin Financial Group, which provides our clients with a
best-in-class North American electronic trade execution platform. We completed the acquisition of
Daniels & Associates, L.P., a leading mergers and acquisitions advisory firm specializing in the
communications, media and entertainment, and technology sectors. In addition, we completed the
acquisition of Seasongood & Mayer, LLC, strengthening our franchise as one of the leading municipal
finance platforms in the U.S. We also completed the acquisition of J.B. Hanauer & Co., expanding
our retail fixed income and wealth management capabilities in New Jersey, Florida and Pennsylvania.
Internationally, we strategically expanded our distribution network, products and services in
fast-growing markets and regions. During the year, we announced our intention to acquire RBTT
Financial Group (RBTT) to expand our banking footprint in the
Caribbean. The acquisition is expected to close
by the middle of 2008 (1), and will create one of the most extensive retail banking
networks in the Caribbean, with a presence in 18 countries and territories across the region. We
also announced our intention to acquire a 50% interest in Fidelity Merchant Bank & Trust Limited,
the Bahamas-based wholly owned subsidiary of Fidelity Bank & Trust International Limited to form a
joint venture to be called Royal Fidelity Merchant Bank & Trust Limited, which is expected to close in the first quarter of 2008 (1). This pending
acquisition is expected to extend our growing financial services platform in the Caribbean and will
enable us to have greater access to the fast-growing merchant banking and corporate advisory sector
in the region.
Basel II
As of November 1, 2007, we implemented the International Convergence of Capital Measurement and
Capital Standards: A Revised Framework – Comprehensive Version (June 2006), known as Basel II.
Basel II more closely aligns regulatory capital requirements with a financial institution’s underlying risk
profile and internal risk management practices as compared to Basel I, and is intended to ensure
that our capital holdings adequately underpin those risks. For details related to the implications
of Basel II on our capital management framework and risk measurement approaches, refer to the
Capital management and Risk management sections.
2007
Economic and market review
In 2007, the Canadian economy grew at an estimated rate of 2.6%, which was down slightly from the
2.7% projected a year ago, with domestic demand remaining the key driver of economic growth. Robust
economic growth in the early part of the year, largely reflecting strong consumer spending
underpinned by strong labour market conditions, solid business investment, favourable terms of
trade and solid housing market activities, weakened slightly in the latter part of the year. This
was mainly attributable to slowing U.S. demand and a tightening of credit conditions as a result of
the U.S. subprime mortgage market concerns. While growth of both consumer and business lending
largely remained solid, credit quality weakened moderately during the year as conditions appeared
to be reverting to historical averages. The Bank of Canada raised the overnight rate by 25 bps in
July to 4.5%, and kept the rate unchanged in September and October taking into account the
tightening of credit conditions arising from the U.S. subprime mortgage market concerns and the
marked appreciation of the Canadian dollar, which had a negative impact on net exports. To address
the liquidity concerns and to support the efficient functioning of the Canadian financial system,
the Bank of Canada injected liquidity into the financial markets on a number of occasions over the
latter part of the year.
The U.S. economy grew at an estimated rate of 2% for the year, down from the 2.6% projected in
2006. This downward revision to growth was primarily attributable to the U.S. subprime mortgage
market concerns. Solid economic growth in the middle of the year, primarily supported by continued
non-residential investment, strong export growth and still-solid consumer spending, slowed in the
latter part of the year. The weakened economic growth was largely a result of slowing residential
investment amid the ongoing housing market correction, a tightening of credit conditions and
increased funding costs arising from the U.S. subprime mortgage market concerns, as well as a
general repricing of risk in numerous markets. Consumer and business lending, excluding mortgages,
accelerated over recent months, although there remained concerns that the intensification of the
housing market correction would eventually dampen lending. Credit quality weakened, particularly in
high-risk credit products and residential real estate-related loans. To alleviate the mounting
liquidity
(1)
These acquisitions are subject to customary closing conditions including regulatory
and shareholder approvals.
Royal Bank of Canada: Annual Report 2007
36 Management’s Discussion and Analysis
concerns and to ease the U.S. financial market volatility arising from the U.S. subprime mortgage
market difficulties, the U.S. Federal Reserve injected a significant amount of liquidity into
financial markets beginning in August. It then lowered its federal funds rate
by 50 bps and 25 bps in September and October, respectively, to 4.5%, in an effort to promote
economic growth, forestall a severe economic downturn and alleviate liquidity concerns.
Growth in other global economies remained solid for the year. Although central banks in the
United Kingdom, the Eurozone and Japan had indicated their intention
to further increase interest
rates to contain inflationary pressures in the early part of the year, they had put their
tightening monetary policies on hold to avoid an economic slowdown, taking into account the
financial market volatility triggered by U.S. subprime mortgage market concerns.
Compared to our favourable outlook in 2006, global capital market conditions were mixed during
the year, largely attributable to the U.S. subprime mortgage market concerns. Most major equity
markets reached record highs in June and July, and then declined as did the debt markets, except
for government bonds, largely due to the spillover effects of the U.S. subprime mortgage market
difficulties. Debt and equity origination activities, which were strong at the beginning of the
year, slowed due to less favourable pricing and a tightening of liquidity. Merger and acquisitions
(M&A) activity remained strong for most of the year.
2007 Performance vs. objectives
Table 2
2007
2007
Objectives
Performance
Diluted earnings per share (EPS) growth
10
%+
17
%
Defined operating leverage (1)
>3
%
2.6
%
Return on common equity (ROE)
20
%+
24.6
%
Tier 1 capital ratio (2)
8
%+
9.4
%
Dividend payout ratio
40%–50
%
43
%
(1)
Our defined operating leverage refers to the difference between our revenue growth
rate (as adjusted) and non-interest expense growth rate (as adjusted). Revenue
is based on a taxable equivalent basis and excludes consolidated Variable interest entities
(VIEs), accounting adjustments related to the new financial instruments accounting standards and
Global Insurance revenue. Non-interest expense excludes Global Insurance expense. This is a
non-GAAP measure. For further information including a reconciliation, refer to the Key
performance and non-GAAP measures section.
(2)
Calculated using guidelines issued by the OSFI.
2007 Annual objectives
Our diluted EPS growth, ROE and dividend payout ratio compared favourably to our annual objectives,
largely reflecting strong performance across most of our businesses.
We also increased our dividend by $.38, or 26%, in 2007. Our defined operating leverage ratio was
below our annual objective, reflecting higher costs in support of our growing business as well as
investment in future growth initiatives including acquisitions. Our capital position remained
strong, with a Tier 1 capital ratio comfortably above our target.
Medium-term objective
Our medium-term objective is to achieve top quartile (1) total shareholder return (TSR) compared to
our Canadian and U.S. peers. This medium-term objective increases our focus on our priority to
maximize shareholder value and requires us to consider both our current performance and our
investment in higher return businesses that will provide sustainable competitive advantage and
stable earnings growth.
Our three-year average annual TSR (2) of 25% ranks us in the top quartile compared to our peer
group and compares favourably with the three-year average annual TSR for our peer group of 8%. Our
performance reflects our strong financial results, including returns on our investment in our
businesses, and effective risk and capital management, which has allowed us to successfully meet
most of our annual earnings and capital objectives over the last three years.
Our five-year average annual TSR (2) of 19% ranks us in the second quartile against our peer
group. This compares favourably with the five-year average annual TSR for our peer group of 14%.
Dividends paid over the three-year period have increased at an average annual compounded
rate of 22%.
(1)
Versus the TSR of seven large Canadian financial institutions (Manulife Financial
Corporation, The Bank of Nova Scotia, Toronto-Dominion Bank, Bank of Montreal, Sun Life
Financial Inc., Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce and National Bank of Canada) and 13 U.S.
financial institutions (Bank of America Corporation, JPMorgan Chase & Co., Wells Fargo &
Company, Wachovia Corporation, U.S. Bancorp, SunTrust Banks, Inc., The Bank of New York Mellon
Corporation, BB&T Corporation, Fifth Third Bancorp, National City Corporation, The PNC
Financial Services Group, Inc., KeyCorp and Northern Trust Corporation).
(2)
The three-year average annual TSR is calculated based on share price appreciation plus
reinvested dividend income for the period October 31, 2004 to October 31, 2007. The five-year
average annual TSR is calculated based on the period October 31, 2002 to October 31, 2007.
(1)
For Canadian financial institutions, the Canadian dollar is used. For U.S. financial
institutions, the U.S. dollar is used.
Royal Bank of Canada: Annual Report 2007
Management’s Discussion and Analysis 37
Economic growth in Canada is expected to weaken as a strong Canadian dollar and sluggish U.S.
growth weigh on export growth. Nonetheless, continued favourable terms of trade should support
income growth, which in turn should help sustain business and consumer spending. We expect the Bank
of Canada to decrease interest rates by 50 bps by early 2008, taking into account the intensifying
restraint from the trade sector before shifting to a rising interest rate environment in late 2008
when financial market volatility is expected to dissipate. We forecast that the Canadian dollar
will remain elevated against the U.S. dollar into early 2008, reflecting firm commodity prices,
solid global economic growth and broad-based U.S. dollar weakness. Taking into account modest U.S.
growth, a strong Canadian dollar and a tightening of credit conditions, we expect the Canadian
economy to grow at 2.2% in 2008.
We anticipate that the U.S. financial market volatility will persist into early 2008 as
investors and lenders will remain cautious and risk averse amid a slowdown in the housing market.
U.S. economic growth is expected to accelerate in the latter part of 2008, primarily
underpinned by rising business investment, strong export growth boosted by the relatively weak U.S.
dollar, as well as continued consumer spending reflecting solid personal disposable income and
healthy household balance sheets against a backdrop of lower interest rates, and the abatement of
current financial market volatility and the housing market correction. We project that the U.S.
Federal Reserve will decrease the federal funds rate a further 75 bps by early 2008 to insure that
the downside risks from the financial market turmoil are contained, and will start to increase the
rate in the latter part of 2008 when economic growth is expected to
accelerate. We project that the
U.S. economy will grow at 2.2% in 2008, taking into account anticipated improving economic
conditions in the latter part of the year.
Growth in other global economies is expected to ease moderately in 2008, with the highest
growth projected for China and other emerging Asian economies. Economic growth in Japan and the
Eurozone is anticipated to weaken slightly on moderately slowing investment related to tighter
credit conditions and modest U.S. growth, although it should remain solidly supported by continued
business and household spending.
Business outlook
Although consumer lending growth is expected to moderate in 2008 on tighter credit conditions,
growth should continue to be supported by rising domestic demand amid expanding labour markets. The
introduction of new mortgage products in Canada due to the liberalization of the mortgage insurance
market should also continue to underpin credit growth. We anticipate business lending to remain solid with
ongoing investment spending. While credit quality is projected to weaken moderately, we expect
consumer and business credit quality to remain solid in a historical context, with an anticipated
increase in provision for credit losses primarily resulting from modestly higher average
delinquency rates, portfolio growth and lower recoveries.
Capital market conditions are anticipated to improve from the challenging environment over the
latter part of 2007 stemming from the U.S. subprime mortgage market concerns. Liquidity concerns
should also abate as global financial markets stabilize and gradually return to more normalized
levels of activity. We expect a rebound in underperforming businesses as strains in financial
markets ease.
2008 Objectives
Our primary financial objective continues to focus on providing top quartile TSR relative to our
North American peers. This medium-term objective requires our focus on both current performance as
well as prudent investment in higher return businesses that will provide us with competitive
advantages and stable earnings growth for the future.
2008 Objectives
Table 3
Diluted earnings per share (EPS) growth
7%-10
%
Defined operating leverage (1)
>3
%
Return on common equity (ROE)
20%
+
Tier 1 capital ratio (2)
8%
+
Dividend payout ratio
40%-50
%
(1)
Our defined operating leverage is a non-GAAP measure and refers to the difference between our
revenue growth rate (as adjusted) and non-interest expense growth rate (as adjusted).
(2)
Calculated using guidelines issued by the OSFI under Basel II, which changes the
methodology for the determination of risk-adjusted assets (RAA) and regulatory capital.
For 2008, our financial objectives have been established taking into consideration our three
strategic goals and our economic and business outlooks as outlined in
this section. Objectives
for our defined operating leverage, ROE, Tier 1 capital ratio and dividend payout ratio remain unchanged, reflecting our continued
commitment to strong revenue growth and cost containment, as well as sound and effective management of capital resources.
Our 2008 diluted EPS growth objective is 7% to 10%. Our objectives factor in the effect of our pending acquisitions of ANB and
RBTT, which will be funded partly through issuance of our common shares, as well as the related
integration costs.
Accounting and control matters
Critical accounting policies and estimates
Application of critical accounting policies and estimates
Our
significant accounting policies and estimates are
described in Note 1 to our Consolidated Financial
Statements. Certain of these policies, as well as estimates made by management in applying such
policies, are recognized as critical because they require us to make particularly subjective or
complex judgments about matters that are inherently uncertain and because of the likelihood that
significantly different amounts could be reported under different conditions or using different
assumptions. Our critical accounting policies and estimates relate to the allowance for credit
losses, fair value of financial instruments, other-than-temporary impairment of available-for-sale
and held-to-maturity securities, securitization, variable interest entities, pensions and other
post-employment benefits and income taxes. Our critical accounting policies and estimates have been
reviewed and approved by our Audit Committee, in consultation with management, as part of their
review and approval of our significant accounting policies and estimates.
Allowance for credit losses
The allowance for credit losses represents management’s estimate of identified credit related
losses in the portfolio, as well as losses that have been incurred but are not yet identifiable at
the balance sheet date. The allowance is established to cover the lending portfolio including
loans, acceptances, letters of credit and guarantees, and unfunded commitments. The allowance for
credit losses comprises the specific allowance and the general allowance. The specific allowance is
Royal Bank of Canada: Annual Report 2007
38 Management’s Discussion and Analysis
determined through management’s identification and determination of losses related to impaired
loans. The general allowance is determined on a quarterly basis through management’s assessment of
probable losses in the remaining portfolio.
The process for determining the allowances involves quantitative and qualitative assessments
using current and historical credit information. Our lending portfolio is reviewed on an ongoing
basis to assess whether any borrowers should be classified as impaired and whether an allowance or
write-off is required. The process inherently requires the use of certain assumptions and judgments
including: (i) assessing the impaired status and risk ratings of loans; (ii) estimating cash flows
and collateral values; (iii) developing default and loss rates based on historical and industry
data; (iv) adjusting loss rates and risk parameters based on the relevance of historical loss rate
given changes in credit strategies, processes and policies; (v) assessing the current credit
quality of the portfolio based on credit quality trends in relation to impairments, write-offs and
recoveries, portfolio characteristics and composition; and (vi) determining the current position in
the economic and credit cycles. Changes in these assumptions or using other reasonable judgments
can materially affect the allowance level and thereby our net income.
Specific allowances
Specific allowances are established to cover estimated losses on both retail and wholesale impaired
loans. Loan impairment is recognized when, based on management’s judgment, there is no longer
reasonable assurance that all interest and principal payments will be made in accordance with the
loan agreement.
For wholesale portfolios including small business loans managed individually, which are
continuously monitored, an account is classified as impaired based on our evaluation of the
borrower’s overall financial condition, its available resources and its propensity to pay amounts
as they come due. A specific allowance is then established on individual accounts that are
classified as impaired, using management’s judgment relating to the timing of future cash flow
amounts that can be reasonably expected from the borrower, financially responsible guarantors and
the realization of collateral. The amounts expected to be recovered are reduced by estimated
collection costs and discounted at the effective interest rate of the obligation.
For retail portfolios managed on a pooled basis, including residential mortgages and personal
and small business loans, accounts are classified as impaired based on contractual delinquency
status, generally 90 days past due. The estimation of specific allowance on these accounts is based
on formulas that apply product-specific net write-off ratios to the related impaired amounts. The
net write-off ratios are based on historical loss rates, adjusted to reflect management’s judgment
relating to recent credit quality trends, portfolio characteristics and composition, and economic
and business conditions. Credit card balances are directly written off after payments are 180 days
past due. Personal loans are generally written off at 150 days past due.
General allowance
The general allowance is established to cover estimated credit losses that are incurred in the
lending portfolio that have not yet been specifically identified as impaired. This estimation is
based on a number of assumptions including: (i) the level of unidentified problem loans given
current economic and business conditions; (ii) the timing of the realization of impairment; (iii)
the gross exposure of a credit facility at the time of default; and (iv) the ultimate severity of
loss. In determining the appropriate level of general allowance, management first employs
statistical models using historical loss rates and risk parameters to estimate a range of probable
losses over an economic cycle. Management then considers changes in the credit granting process
including underwriting, limit setting and the workout process in order to adjust historical
experience to better reflect the current environment. In addition, current credit information
including portfolio composition, credit quality trends and economic and business information is
assessed to determine the appropriate allowance level.
For heterogeneous loans (wholesale loans including small business loans managed individually),
the general allowance is based on the application of estimated probability of default, gross
exposure at default and loss factors, which are determined by historical loss experience and
delineated by loan type and rating. These parameters are based on historical loss rates (default
migration, loss severity and exposure at default), supplemented by industry studies and are updated
on a regular basis. This approach allows us to generate a range of potential losses over an
economic cycle. One of the key judgmental factors that influence the loss estimate for this
portfolio is the application of the internal risk rating framework, which relies on our
quantitative and qualitative assessments of a borrower’s financial condition in order to assign an
internal credit risk rating similar to those used by external rating agencies. Any material change
in the above parameters or assumptions would affect the range of probable credit losses and
consequently may affect the general allowance level.
For homogeneous portfolios (retail loans) including residential mortgages, credit cards, as
well as personal and small business loans that are managed on a pooled basis, the determination of
the general allowance is based on the application of historical loss rates. Historical loss rates
are applied to current outstanding loans to determine a range of probable losses over an economic
cycle.
In determining the general allowance level, management also considers the current portfolio
credit quality trends, business and economic conditions, the impact of policy and process changes,
and other supporting factors. In addition, the general allowance includes a component for the model
limitations and imprecision inherent in the allowance methodologies.
Any fundamental change in methodology is subject to independent vetting and review.
Total allowance for credit losses
Based on the procedures discussed above, management believes that the total allowance for credit
losses of $1,572 million is adequate to absorb estimated credit losses incurred in the lending
portfolio as at October 31, 2007. This amount includes $79 million classified in other liabilities,
which relates to letters of credit and guarantees and unfunded commitments. The year-over-year
increase of $86 million largely reflects the increase in impaired loans.
Fair value of financial instruments
With the adoption of the three new accounting standards related to financial instruments on
November 1, 2006, a greater portion of our Consolidated Balance Sheet is now measured at fair
value. Refer to Note 1 to our Consolidated Financial Statements for a detailed discussion. Under
the new standards, all financial instruments are required to be measured at fair value on initial
recognition except for certain related party transactions. Measurement in subsequent periods
depends on whether the financial instruments have been classified or designated as
held-for-trading, available-for-sale, held-to-maturity, loans and receivables or other financial
liabilities.
Financial assets and financial liabilities held-for-trading, including derivative instruments,
are measured at fair value with changes in the fair values recognized in net income, except for
derivatives designated in effective cash flow hedges or hedges of foreign currency exposure of a
net investment in a self-sustaining foreign operation; the changes in the fair values of those
derivatives are recognized in Other comprehensive income (OCI). Available-for-sale financial assets
are also measured at fair value with unrealized gains and losses, including changes in foreign
exchange rates, being recognized in OCI except for investments in equity instruments classified as
available-for-sale that do not have a quoted market price in an active market, which are measured
at cost. Financial assets held-to-maturity, loans and receivables, and other financial liabilities
are measured at amortized cost using the effective interest method.
At October 31, 2007, approximately $276 billion, or 46%, of our financial assets and $205
billion, or 36%, of our financial liabilities were carried at fair value ($184 billion, or 34%, of
financial assets and
Royal Bank of Canada: Annual Report 2007
Management’s Discussion and Analysis 39
$80 billion, or 16%, of financial liabilities at October 31, 2006).
Note 2 to our Consolidated Financial Statements provides disclosure of
the fair value of our financial instruments as at October 31, 2007.
Fair
value is defined as the amount at which a financial instrument could be bought or sold in
a current transaction, other than in a forced or liquidation sale, between knowledgeable and
willing parties in an arm’s-length transaction under no compulsion to act. The best evidence of
fair value is quoted bid or ask price, as appropriate, in an active market. Where bid and ask
prices are unavailable, we use the closing price of the most recent transaction of that instrument
subject to the liquidity adjustments referred to below. Where quoted prices are not available for a
particular financial instrument, we use the quoted price of a financial instrument with similar
characteristics and risk profiles or internal or external valuation models using observable
market-based inputs to estimate the fair value.
The determination of fair value for actively traded financial instruments that have quoted
market prices or readily observable model input parameters requires minimal subjectivity.
Management’s judgment is required, however, when the observable market prices and parameters do not
exist. In addition, management exercises judgment when establishing market valuation adjustments
for liquidity when we believe that the amount realized on sale may be less than the estimated fair
value due to insufficient liquidity over a short period of time. This includes adjustments
calculated when market prices are not observable due to insufficient trading volume or a lack of
recent trades in a less active or inactive market. In addition, liquidity adjustments are
calculated to reflect the cost of unwinding a larger than normal market risk position.
The majority of our financial instruments classified as held-for-trading other than
derivatives and financial assets classified as available-for-sale comprise or relate to actively
traded debt and equity securities, which are carried at fair value based on available quoted
prices. As few derivatives and financial instruments designated as held-for-trading are actively
quoted, we rely primarily on internally developed pricing models and established industry standard
pricing models, such as Black-Schöles, to determine fair value. In determining the assumptions to
be used in our pricing models, we look primarily to external readily observable market inputs
including factors such as
interest rate yield curves, currency rates and price and rate volatilities as applicable. However,
certain derivative financial instruments are valued using significant unobservable market inputs
such as default correlations, among others. These inputs are subject to significantly more
quantitative analysis and management judgment. Where input parameters are not based on market
observable data, we defer the initial trading profit until the amounts deferred become realized
through the receipt and/or payment of cash or once the input parameters are observable in the
market. We also record fair value adjustments to account for measurement uncertainty due to model
risk and parameter uncertainty when valuing complex or less actively traded financial instruments.
For further information on our derivative instruments, refer to Note 7 to our Consolidated
Financial Statements.
The following table summarizes our significant financial assets and liabilities carried at
fair value, by valuation methodology at October 31, 2007 and October 31, 2006. We have applied the
general concepts contained in the accounting standards related to financial instruments under
Canadian GAAP to determine the classification of assets and liabilities carried at fair value among
the valuation methodology groupings below.
Instruments grouped within “quoted prices” include those where prices are obtained from an
exchange, dealer, broker, industry group, pricing service or regulatory agency, or net asset values
provided by fund managers of mutual funds and hedge funds. Instruments priced based on models are
grouped based on whether the models include significant observable or unobservable parameters.
Where fair value is not evidenced by observable market parameters, and day one unrealized gains and
losses are not permitted under Canadian GAAP, the instrument is grouped as being based on “pricing
models with significant unobservable market parameters.”
In
September 2006, the U.S. Financial Accounting Standards
Board (FASB) issued FAS 157, Fair Value Measurements, which includes measurement
guidance and requires that all financial instruments measured at fair value be categorized in fair
value hierarchy levels. We have not adopted these measurement and
disclosure requirements for U.S. GAAP reconciliation disclosure purposes, and the information contained in the table below is not
intended to correspond to those levels.
Assets and liabilities carried at fair value by valuation methodology
Table 4
2007
2006 (1)
Based on
Based on
Pricing
Pricing
Pricing
Pricing
models with
models with
models with
models with
significant
significant
significant
significant
observable
unobservable
observable
unobservable
(C$ millions,
Quoted
market
market
Quoted
market
market
except percentage amounts)
Fair value
prices
parameters
parameters
Total
Fair value
prices
parameters
parameters
Total
Financial assets
Required to
be classified as held-for-trading
other than derivatives (2)
$
129,408
82
%
18
%
—
100
%
$
147,237
87
%
13
%
$
—
100
%
Derivatives
(3)
65,568
—
100
%
—
100
%
37,008
—
100
%
—
100
%
Designated
as held-for-trading (2)
52,580
36
%
64
%
—
100
%
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
Classified as available-for-sale
28,811
70
%
28
%
2
%
100
%
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
$
276,367
$
184,245
Financial liabilities
Required to
be classified as held-for-trading
other than derivatives (2)
$
46,328
89
%
11
%
—
100
%
$
38,252
97
%
3
%
$
—
100
%
Derivatives
(4)
71,422
—
99
%
1
%
100
%
41,728
—
100
%
—
100
%
Designated
as held-for-trading (2)
87,433
—
100
%
—
100
%
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
$
205,183
$
79,980
(1)
Prior to the adoption of the new accounting standards related to financial instruments on
November 1, 2006, there were no financial assets or financial
liabilities designated as
held-for-trading and there were no financial assets classified as available-for-sale.
Consequently, prior period comparatives are not applicable (n.a.).
(2)
The categories of financial instruments are explained in Note
1 to our Consolidated Financial Statements.
(3)
The fair value excludes margin requirements of $1,017 million (2006 — $721 million).
(4)
The fair value excludes market and credit valuation adjustments of $588 million (2006 — $366
million).
Royal Bank of Canada: Annual Report 2007
40 Management’s Discussion and Analysis
With the adoption of the new financial instruments accounting standards, there are new categories of financial
instruments carried at fair value such as financial assets and financial liabilities
designated as held-for-trading and financial assets classified as available-for-sale which were carried at amortized cost prior to November 1,2006. Further, all derivatives are now carried at fair value whereas prior to that date, only derivatives other than designated hedging instruments
were carried at fair value. Accordingly, the comparative amounts for 2006 in the above table do not include these financial instruments.
The decrease of $18 billion in financial assets classified as held-for-trading and the increase of
$8 billion in financial liabilities classified as held-for-trading in 2007 are primarily due to our
equity and bond securities held related to our proprietary equity arbitrage and fixed income
trading businesses, where we offset the risks from our securities holdings by short selling other
securities that are of similar risks to those in our portfolios. The increase of $29 billion in
derivative assets and of $30 billion in derivative liabilities in 2007, primarily in foreign
exchange and interest rate contracts, are largely due to increased volatility, strong shifts in
exchange rates and interest rates, and higher client and trading activity, partially offset by the
weakening of the U.S. dollar relative to the Canadian dollar. These activities are consistent with
our strategy for these businesses and the increases in 2007 are within the approved risk limits.
The determination of fair value where quoted prices are not available, and the identification
of appropriate valuation adjustments require management judgment and are based on quantitative
research and analysis. Our risk management group is responsible for establishing our valuation
methodologies and policies, which address the use and calculation of valuation adjustments. These
methodologies are reviewed on an ongoing basis to ensure that they remain appropriate. Risk
management’s oversight in the valuation process also includes ensuring all significant financial
valuation models are strictly controlled and regularly recalibrated and vetted to provide an
independent perspective. During the year, there was no significant change to our methodologies for
determining fair value, including those for establishing any valuation adjustments. Refer to the
Risk management section for further detail on the sensitivity of financial instruments used in
trading and non-trading activities.
Other-than-temporary impairment of available-for-sale and held-to-maturity securities
Available-for-sale and held-to-maturity securities are assessed for impairment at each reporting
date. When the fair value of any security has declined below its amortized cost, management is
required to assess whether the decline is other-than-temporary. In making this assessment, we
consider such factors as the type of investment, the length of time and extent to which the fair
value has been below the amortized cost, the financial and credit aspects of the issuer, and our
intent and ability to hold the investment long enough to allow for any anticipated recovery. The
decision to record a writedown, its amount and the period in which it is recorded could change if
management’s assessment of one or more of those factors is different. If the decline in value is
considered to be other-than-temporary, the cumulative changes in the fair values of
available-for-sale securities previously recognized in Accumulated other comprehensive income
(AOCI) are reclassified to net income during that period. For further details, refer to Notes 1 and
3 to our Consolidated Financial Statements.
Securitization
We periodically securitize Canadian residential mortgages, credit card receivables and commercial
mortgage loans by selling them to special purpose entities (SPEs) or trusts that issue securities
to investors. Some of the key accounting determinations in a securitization of our loans are
whether the transfer of the loans meets the criteria required to be treated as a sale and, if so,
the valuation of our retained interests in the securitized loans. Refer to Note 1 to our
Consolidated Financial Statements for a detailed description of the accounting policy for loan
securitization.
When we securitize loans and retain an interest in the securitized loans, it is a matter of
judgment whether the loans have been legally isolated. We obtain legal opinions where required to
give us comfort that legal isolation of the transferred loans has been achieved. We often retain
interests in securitized loans such as interest-only strips, servicing rights or cash reserve
accounts. Where quoted market prices are not available, the valuation of retained interests in sold
assets is based on our best estimate of several key assumptions such as the payment rate of the
transferred loans, weighted average life of the prepayable receivables, excess spread, expected
credit losses and
discount rate. The fair value of such retained interests calculated using these assumptions affects
the gain or loss that is recognized from the sale of the loans. Refer to Note 5 to our Consolidated
Financial Statements for the volume of securitization activities of our loans, the gain or loss
recognized on sale and a sensitivity analysis of the key assumptions used in valuing our retained
interests.
Another key accounting determination is whether the SPE that is used to securitize and sell
our loans is required to be consolidated. As described in Note 6 to our Consolidated Financial
Statements, we concluded that none of the SPEs used to securitize our financial assets should be
consolidated.
Variable interest entities
Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants (CICA) Accounting Guideline 15, Consolidation of
Variable Interest Entities (AcG-15), provides guidance on applying the principles of consolidation
to certain entities defined as variable interest entities (VIEs). Where an entity is considered a
VIE, the Primary Beneficiary is required to consolidate the assets, liabilities and results of
operations of the VIE. The Primary Beneficiary is the entity that is exposed, through variable
interests, to a majority of the VIE’s expected losses (as defined in AcG-15) or is entitled to a
majority of the VIE’s expected residual returns (as defined in AcG-15), or both.
We use a variety of complex estimation processes involving both qualitative and quantitative
factors to determine whether an entity is a VIE, and, if required, to analyze and calculate the
expected losses and the expected residual returns. These processes involve estimating the future
cash flows and performance of the VIE, analyzing the variability in those cash flows, and
allocating the losses and returns among the identified parties holding variable interests to
determine who is the Primary Beneficiary. In addition, there is a significant amount of judgment
exercised in interpreting the provisions of AcG-15 and applying them to our specific transactions.
AcG-15 applies to a variety of our businesses, including our involvement with multi-seller
conduits we administer, credit investment products and structured finance transactions. For further
details on our involvement with VIEs, refer to the Off-balance sheet arrangements section and Note
6 to our Consolidated Financial Statements.
Pensions and other post-employment benefits
We sponsor a number of defined benefit and defined contribution plans providing pension and other
benefits to eligible employees after retirement. These plans include registered pension plans,
supplemental pension plans and health, dental, disability and life insurance plans. The pension
plans provide benefits based on years of service, contributions and average earnings at retirement.
Due to the long-term nature of these plans, the calculation of benefit expenses and
obligations depends on various assumptions such as discount rates, expected rates of return on
assets, health care cost trend rates, projected salary increases, retirement age, mortality and
termination rates. The discount rate assumption is determined using a yield curve of AA corporate debt
securities. All other assumptions are determined by management and are reviewed annually by the
actuaries. Actual experience that differs from the actuarial assumptions will affect the amounts of
benefit obligation and expense. The weighted average assumptions used and the sensitivity of key
assumptions are presented in Note 20 to our Consolidated Financial Statements.
Income taxes
Management exercises judgment in estimating the provision for income taxes. We are subject to
income tax laws in various jurisdictions where we operate. These complex tax laws are potentially
subject to different interpretations by the taxpayer and the relevant tax authority. The provision
for income taxes represents management’s interpretation of the relevant tax laws and its estimate
of current and future income tax implications of the transactions and events during the period. A
future income tax asset or liability is determined for each temporary difference based on the
future tax rates that are expected to be in effect and management’s assumptions regarding the
expected timing of the reversal of such temporary differences.
Royal Bank of Canada: Annual Report 2007
Management’s Discussion and Analysis 41
Future changes in accounting policies and disclosure
Canadian GAAP
Capital Disclosures and Financial Instruments — Disclosures
and Presentation
On December 1, 2006, CICA issued three new accounting standards:
Handbook Section 1535, Capital Disclosures (Section 1535), Handbook
Section 3862, Financial Instruments — Disclosures (Section 3862),
and Handbook Section 3863, Financial Instruments — Presentation
(Section 3863). These new standards became effective for us on
November 1, 2007.
Section 1535 requires the disclosure of (i) an entity’s objectives, policies and processes for
managing capital; (ii) quantitative data about what the entity regards as capital; (iii) whether
the entity has complied with any capital requirements; and (iv) if it has not complied, the
consequences of such non-compliance.
Sections 3862 and 3863 replace Handbook Section 3861, Financial Instruments — Disclosure and
Presentation, revising and enhancing its disclosure requirements, and carrying its presentation requirements forward unchanged. These new sections place increased emphasis on disclosures about the
nature and extent of risks arising from financial instruments and how the entity manages those
risks.
U.S. GAAP
Guidance on accounting for income taxes
FASB issued FASB Interpretation
No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes — an Interpretation
of FASB Statement No. 109 (FIN 48), on July 13, 2006, and its related Staff Position FIN 48-1,
Definition of Settlement in FASB Interpretation No. 48 (FSP FIN 48-1), on May 2, 2007. FIN 48 and
FSP FIN 48-1 provide additional guidance on how to recognize, measure and disclose income tax
benefits. FIN 48 became effective for us on November 1, 2007, and we do not expect it will have a
material impact on our consolidated financial position and results of operations.
Framework on fair value measurement
On September 15, 2006, FASB issued FASB Statement No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (FAS 157), which
establishes a framework for measuring fair value in U.S. GAAP and is applicable to other
accounting pronouncements where fair value is considered to be the relevant measurement attribute.
FAS 157 also expands disclosures about fair value measurements and will be effective for us on
November 1, 2008. We are currently assessing the impact of adopting this standard on our
consolidated financial position and results of operations.
Fair value option for financial assets and liabilities
On February 15, 2007, FASB issued Statement
No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Liabilities (FAS 159). FAS 159 provides an
entity the option to report selected financial assets and liabilities at fair value and establishes
new disclosure requirements for assets and liabilities to which the fair value option is applied.
FAS 159 will be effective for us on November 1, 2008. We are currently assessing the impact of
adopting this standard on our consolidated financial position and results of operations.
Controls and procedures
Disclosure controls and procedures
Our disclosure controls and procedures are designed to provide reasonable assurance that
information required to be disclosed by us is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within
the time periods specified under Canadian and U.S. securities laws and include controls and
procedures that are designed to ensure that information is accumulated and communicated to
management, including the President and Chief Executive Officer, and Chief Financial Officer, to allow timely decisions
regarding required disclosure.
Management evaluated, under the supervision of and with the participation of the President and
CEO, and Chief Financial Officer, the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as
defined under Multilateral Instrument 52-109 and the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as
of October 31, 2007. Based on that evaluation, the President and Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of
October 31, 2007.
Internal control over financial reporting
Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial
reporting to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with GAAP. Management
assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial
reporting as of October 31, 2007,
and based on that assessment, concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was
effective. See page 112 for Management’s report on internal control over financial reporting and
the Report of Independent Registered Chartered Accountants. No changes were made in our internal
control over financial reporting during the year ended October 31, 2007, that have materially
affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial
reporting.
Royal Bank of Canada: Annual Report 2007
42 Management’s Discussion and Analysis
We reported record net income of $5,492 million for the year ended October 31, 2007, up $764
million, or 16%, from a year ago. Diluted EPS were $4.19, up 17% compared to a year ago. ROE was
24.6%, compared to 23.5% a year ago. Our strong results were largely attributable to profitable
volume and balance growth in our banking and wealth management businesses, strong Global Insurance
results, and increased equity and foreign exchange trading results and strong equity origination
activity in our capital markets businesses. These results reflected the ongoing successful
execution of our growth initiatives as well as generally favourable economic and market conditions
for most of the year. For additional discussion on the performance of
our business segments, refer to the Business Segment results section
starting on page 57. A gain related to the Visa Inc. restructuring and the exchange of our
membership interest in Visa Canada Association for shares of Visa Inc. also contributed to the
increase. These factors were partially offset by the writedowns on the valuation of U.S. subprime
residential mortgage-backed securities (RMBS) and collateralized
debt obligations of asset-backed
securities (CDOs of ABS) reflecting the deterioration in credit markets since July 2007, higher
provisions for credit losses reflecting portfolio growth and higher impaired loans in our U.S.
residential builder finance business, and higher credit card customer loyalty reward program
costs. Also partly offsetting the favourable factors were higher costs in support of our business
growth and the negative impact of a stronger Canadian dollar on the translated value of our U.S.
dollar-denominated earnings. The Tier 1 capital ratio of 9.4% was down 20 bps from 9.6% a year ago,
while the Total capital ratio of 11.5% was down 40 bps from 11.9% a year ago.
U.S. subprime
In October 2007, the credit markets deteriorated dramatically after rating agencies downgraded a
broad group of U.S. subprime RMBS and CDOs of ABS. Following these events, we recognized a charge
of $357 million before-tax in Capital Markets, consisting of writedowns on the fair value of our
direct holdings of U.S. subprime RMBS and CDOs of ABS and related credit default swaps.
Our
Capital Markets holdings of RMBS and CDOs of ABS arose primarily in
relation to our role in structuring CDOs of ABS and are classified as
held-for-trading, with unrealized changes in fair value reflected in
our Non-interest income. Our other holdings are RMBS and are classified as available-for-sale, and unrealized changes in fair value
are generally reflected in Other comprehensive income. These changes are reflected in Non-interest income only
if management determines that it is appropriate that the value be written down (referred to as
“other-than-temporary impairment”).
As at October 1, 2007, Capital Markets had $216 million of
net exposure to U.S. subprime CDOs of ABS, after taking into
consideration protection provided by credit default swaps. We have
credit default swaps providing protection of $240 million,
recorded at fair market value of $104 million, with
counterparties rated less than AAA by Standard &
Poor’s (S&P) and less than Aaa by Moody’s Investors
Service (Moody’s). Other credit default swaps provide an
additional $1,053 million or protection against our gross
exposure and are either collateralized or with counterparties rated
AAA by S&P and Aaa by Moody’s.
As at October 31, 2007, we had $388 million of exposure to
U.S. subprime RMBS recorded as available-for-sale, which we intend to
hold until maturity. As at October 31, 2007, Capital Markets had
no net exposure to U.S. subprime RMBS after taking into account
credit default swaps that provide $1,113 million of protection
and are either collateralized or with counterparties rated AAA by
S&P and Aaa by Moody’s.
Canadian
non-bank-sponsored asset-backed commercial paper
As at
October 31, 2007, we had $4 million of direct holdings of
Canadian non-bank-sponsored asset-backed commercial paper conduits
where liquidity is contingent on a general market disruption. We are
not a significant participant in this market as a distributor or a
liquidity provider.
Structured
investment vehicles
We had
$1 million of direct holdings, $140 million of committed
liquidity facilities and $88 million of normal course interest
rate derivatives with structured investment vehicles (SIVs) as at
October 31, 2007. Our liquidity facilities remained undrawn at
October 31, 2007 and we do not consider any of our positions to
be impaired. We do not manage any SIVs.
Impact of U.S. vs. Canadian dollar
The translated value of our consolidated results is impacted by fluctuations in the respective
exchange rates relative to the Canadian dollar. The following table depicts the effect of
translating current year Canadian dollar/U.S. dollar consolidated results at the current exchange
rate in comparison to the historical period’s exchange rate. We believe this provides the reader
with the ability to assess the underlying results on a more comparable basis, particularly given
the magnitude of the recent changes in the exchange rate and the resulting impact on our results.
Certain of our business segment results are also impacted by fluctuations in the U.S. dollar,
Euro and British pound exchange rates. For further details, refer to the Impact of foreign exchange
rates on our business segments section.
Royal Bank of Canada: Annual Report 2007
Management’s Discussion and Analysis 43
Percentage change in average US$
equivalent of C$1.00 (1)
4
%
7
%
Reduced total revenue
$
230
$
425
Reduced non-interest expense
139
215
Reduced net income
47
123
Reduced basic EPS
$
.04
$
.10
Reduced diluted EPS
$
.04
$
.09
(1)
Average amounts are calculated using month-end spot rates for the period.
In 2007, the Canadian dollar appreciated 4% on average compared to a year ago resulting in a $47
million decrease in the translated value of our U.S. dollar-denominated net income and a decrease
of $.04 in our current year’s diluted EPS.
Impact of the new financial instruments accounting standards
On November 1, 2006, we adopted three new accounting standards related to financial instruments
that were issued by CICA. The standards require a
greater portion of our Consolidated Balance Sheet to be measured at fair value with changes in the
fair values reported in income in the period they occur, except for available-for-sale securities,
derivatives designated as cash flow hedges, and hedges of net investments in foreign operations,
the changes in fair value of which are recognized in OCI. The standards also provide new guidance
on the accounting for derivatives in hedging relationships.
The following table provides the main impacts on our Consolidated Statements of Income arising
from the application of the new financial instruments accounting standards. For further details
about the financial instruments accounting standards, refer to Notes 1 and 2 to our Consolidated
Financial Statements.
Impact of the new financial instruments accounting standards
Table 6
(C$ millions)
2007
Significantly impacted segments
Net interest income
$
22
Canadian Banking
Non-interest income
Insurance premiums, investment and fee income
(160
)
Canadian Banking
Trading revenue
18
Capital Markets
Other
35
Wealth Management
Other
8
Corporate Support
Total revenue
$
(77
)
Insurance policyholder benefits, claims and acquisition expense
(154
)
Canadian Banking
Net income
55
Canadian Banking
For the year ended October 31, 2007, we recognized a $22 million increase in net interest income
related to the application of the effective interest method on our residential mortgage portfolio.
In addition, we recorded a loss of $160 million in Insurance premiums, investment and fee income
related to the changes in the fair values of the securities backing our life and health insurance
businesses. These losses were largely offset by a corresponding $154 million decrease in the
measurement of certain liabilities related to life and health insurance policies, recorded in
Insurance policyholder benefits, claims and acquisition expense.
Capital Markets
For the year ended October 31, 2007, we recognized a gain of
$18 million in Trading revenue as a result of the net increase in fair
values in various trading portfolios previously measured at amortized
cost. This gain includes a $59 million gain on our deposit liabilities
designated as held-for-trading resulting from the widening of our own
credit spread during the year.
Wealth Management
For the year ended October 31, 2007, we recorded a $35 million foreign currency translation gain in
Non-interest income — Other related to deposits used to fund certain Available-for-sale securities
denominated in foreign currencies in order to minimize exposure to changes in foreign exchange
rates. The corresponding foreign currency translation loss on the related Available-for-sale
securities was recorded in AOCI.
Corporate Support
For the year ended October 31, 2007, we recognized a gain of $8 million. This consisted of a $32
million gain in Non-interest income — Other related to certain long-term funding notes and
subordinated debentures that were issued and designated as held-for-trading liabilities, including
a $29 million gain related to the widening of our own credit spread during the year. These amounts
were largely offset by $24 million of mark-to-market losses mainly related to the recognition of
the ineffectiveness of hedged items and the related derivatives in hedge accounting relationships.
Summary of 2006 and 2005
In 2006, we achieved net income of $4,728 million, up $1,341 million, or 40%, from 2005. Our strong
earnings reflected solid business growth across all business segments and our successful execution
of growth initiatives, despite the negative impact of the strong Canadian dollar on the translated
value of our foreign currency-denominated results. Our 2005 results reflected the Enron
litigation-related provision. Our strong results in 2006 were also underpinned by generally
favourable economic and credit conditions in both domestic and international markets.
In 2006, the Canadian economy grew by 2.8%, primarily bolstered by robust domestic demand.
These factors were partially offset by a weakening in exports and manufacturing activities against
a backdrop of a strong Canadian dollar, high but falling energy prices, slowing U.S. demand and
competition from emerging markets. The U.S. economy recorded a growth rate of 2.9%, reflecting
solid consumer and business spending supported by strong balance sheets as well as strength in the
labour market, though partly restrained by the lagged effects of increases in interest rates and
high but falling energy prices.
Royal Bank of Canada: Annual Report 2007
44 Management’s Discussion and Analysis
During 2006, strong consumer lending was supported by favourable labour market conditions and
a relatively low interest rate environment. Business lending remained solid, albeit in part offset
by surpluses of internally generated funds available for capital and inventory investment. The
favourable credit environment, together with healthy household and corporate balance sheets,
continued to support strong consumer and business credit quality. Capital market conditions were
generally favourable, characterized by buoyant M&A activity in Canada and strong performance of
natural resource-based equities. Debt origination activity in the U.S. and Europe weakened in 2006
in part due to rising interest rates and the negative impact of the strengthening of the Canadian
dollar.
During 2006, a number of specified items were identified, which had minimal impacts on our
overall results as their effects largely offset each other. We realized a favourable resolution of
an income tax audit related to prior years, resulting in a $70 million reduction in income tax
expense. We received $51 million related to the termination of an agreement. We reversed $50
million of general allowance related to our corporate loan portfolio. We also recorded a net gain
of $40 million on the exchange of New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) seats for shares in the NYSE Group
(NYX). We incurred a net charge of $16 million ($19 million after-tax, which included a write-off of
deferred taxes) related to the transfer of our Institutional & Investor Services business to the
joint venture RBC Dexia IS. We recorded a $61 million (before-tax and after-tax) charge in our
insurance business for additional estimated net claims for damages predominantly related to
hurricane Wilma, which occurred in late 2005. In addition, we made a $72 million adjustment to
increase our credit card customer loyalty reward program costs.
In 2005, net income was $3,387 million, up $584 million, or 21%, from 2004. Our strong
earnings were supported by our successful execution of client-focused initiatives and favourable
economic conditions, despite the negative impact of an Enron Corp. litigation-related provision and
charges for net claims related to hurricanes Katrina, Rita and Wilma.
In 2005, the Canadian economy grew by 3.1% (1), reflecting strong consumer and business
spending underpinned by low interest rates, robust employment growth and rising house prices,
albeit partially offset by the adverse effects of a strong Canadian dollar and higher energy
prices. The U.S. economy recorded a growth rate of 3.1% (1), fuelled by strong consumer spending
amid solid job growth and surging house prices, despite increases in interest rates and energy
prices and the dampening impacts of hurricanes Katrina, Rita and Wilma. Business investment in the
U.S. was buoyed by both capital and inventory investment. Strong consumer credit quality was
supported by resilient debt-servicing capacity and high household liquidity, while business credit
quality continued to reflect a favourable credit and business environment with a general reduction
in defaults and bankruptcies.
During 2005, we took action to mitigate the uncertainties regarding Enron-related matters,
including the settlement of our part of the MegaClaims bankruptcy lawsuit brought by Enron against
RBC and a number of financial institutions for $31 million (US$25 million). In addition, we settled
an additional $29 million (US$24 million) for recognition of claims against the Enron bankruptcy.
We also established a provision of $591 million (US$500 million) or $326 million aftertax (US$276
million after-tax) for Enron litigation-related matters. We recorded a charge of $203 million
(US$173 million) before- and after-tax for estimated net claims for damages related to hurricanes
Katrina, Rita and Wilma. We completed the sale of Liberty Insurance Services Corporation (LIS) to
IBM Corporation (IBM), and entered into a long-term agreement with IBM to perform key business
processes for RBC Insurance U.S. operations. We also completed the sale of certain assets of RBC
Mortgage Company (RBC Mortgage) to Home123 Corporation.
(1)
Reflects revised data from Statistics Canada and the Bureau of Economic Analysis.
Total revenue
Table 7
(C$ millions)
2007
2006
2005
Interest income
$
26,377
$
22,204
$
16,981
Interest expense
18,845
15,408
10,188
Net interest income
$
7,532
$
6,796
$
6,793
Investments (1)
$
4,405
$
3,786
$
3,357
Insurance (2)
3,152
3,348
3,270
Trading
2,261
2 ,574
1,594
Banking (3)
2,620
2,391
2,326
Underwriting and other advisory
1,217
1,024
1,026
Other (4)
1,275
718
818
Non-interest income
$
14,930
$
13,841
$
12,391
Total revenue
$
22,462
$
20,637
$
19,184
Additional information
Total trading revenue (5)
Net interest income — related to trading activities
$
(390
)
$
(539
)
$
21
Non-interest income — trading revenue
2,261
2,574
1,594
Total
$
1,871
$
2,035
$
1,615
Total trading revenue by product (5)
Interest rate and credit
$
693
$
1,174
$
1,025
Equities
823
561
355
Foreign exchange and commodities
355
300
235
Total
$
1,871
$
2,035
$
1,615
(1)
Includes brokerage, investment management and mutual funds.
(2)
Includes premiums, investment and fee income.
(3)
Includes service charges, foreign exchange other than trading, card services and credit fees.
(4)
Includes other non-interest income, gain/loss on securities sales and securitization.
(5)
Total trading revenue comprises trading-related revenue recorded in Net interest income and
Non-interest income. Total trading revenue includes cash and related derivatives.
Royal Bank of Canada: Annual Report 2007
Management’s Discussion and Analysis 45
Total revenue increased $1,825 million, or 9%, from a year ago. Excluding the impact of the new
financial instruments accounting standards, revenue was up $1,902 million, or 9%. The increase was
largely due to continued strong balance and volume growth in our banking and wealth management
businesses and a gain related to the Visa Inc. restructuring. Higher revenue from several capital
markets businesses also contributed to this increase. The strong growth largely reflected the
successful execution of our strategy including acquisitions, as well as generally favourable market
conditions for most of the year. These factors were partially offset by writedowns on the valuation
of U.S. subprime RMBS and CDOs of ABS, the negative impact of a stronger Canadian dollar on the
translated value of our U.S. dollar-denominated revenue and higher credit card customer loyalty
reward program costs. For a reconciliation of revenue excluding the impact of the new financial
instruments accounting standards, refer to the Key performance and non-GAAP measures section.
Net interest income increased $736 million, or 11%, largely driven by strong loan and
deposit growth. Net interest margin of 1.30% was down 5 bps compared to the prior year.
Investments-related revenue increased $619 million, or 16%, primarily due to continued growth
in fee-based client assets reflecting strong net sales, capital appreciation and the recruitment
and retention of experienced advisors. Growth in custodian and securities lending businesses
reflecting strong market activities, and higher transactional volumes in our brokerage businesses
also contributed to the increase.
Insurance-related revenue decreased $196 million, or 6%. Excluding the impact of the new
financial instruments accounting standards, revenue decreased $36 million, or 1%, from the prior
year, largely reflecting lower U.S. annuity sales mainly due to relatively lower long-term interest
rates and lower revenue from our property catastrophe reinsurance
business, which we exited completely this year. These factors were partially offset by growth in our European life reinsurance
and Canadian businesses. For a reconciliation of Insurance-related revenue excluding the impact of
the new financial instruments accounting standards, refer to the Key performance and non-GAAP
measures section.
Banking revenue was up $229 million, or 10%, mainly due to higher transaction volumes and
client balances and increased loan syndication activity. These factors were partially offset by
higher credit card customer loyalty reward program costs that were recorded against revenue.
Trading revenue decreased by $313 million, or 12%. Total trading revenue was $1,871 million,
down $164 million, or 8%, from a year ago largely due to writedowns totalling $357 million on the
valuation of U.S. subprime RMBS and CDOs of ABS in our Structured Credit business.
Underwriting and other advisory revenue increased $193 million, or 19%, on strong equity
origination activity across all geographies and improved M&A results, mainly in the U.S. These
factors were partially offset by lower U.S. debt origination activity in part due to the tightening
of credit markets in the latter part of 2007 as a result of the U.S. subprime mortgage market
concerns.
Other revenue increased $557 million, or 78%, largely due to a $326 million gain related to
the Visa Inc. restructuring and gains on the fair valuing of credit derivatives used to
economically hedge our corporate loan portfolio. A favourable adjustment of $40 million related to
the reallocation of certain foreign investment capital from
our international insurance operations, which had supported our property catastrophe reinsurance
business, as we exited this business completely this year, a $35 million foreign exchange translation gain on
certain deposits resulting from the implementation of the new financial instruments accounting
standards, and higher private equity gains and distributions also contributed to the increase.
2006 vs. 2005
Total revenue increased $1,453 million, or 8%, from 2005, largely due to record trading results on
improved market conditions and solid business growth in our wealth management and banking
businesses reflecting successful execution of our growth initiatives and favourable market
conditions. Strong M&A activity and the net gain on the exchange of our NYSE seats for NYX shares,
also contributed to the increase. These factors were partially offset by a reduction of $425
million due to the negative impact of the stronger Canadian dollar on the translated value of our
U.S. dollar-denominated revenue, lower debt and equity origination activity and certain favourable
items recorded in 2005.
Net interest income increased $3 million. Strong loan and deposit growth and increased spreads
on deposits and personal investment products were mostly offset by funding costs related to certain
equity trading strategies and the impact of higher securitization balances.
Investments-related revenue increased $429 million, or 13%, primarily due to growth in
fee-based client assets reflecting strong net sales and capital appreciation and the inclusion of
Abacus Financial Services Group Limited. Higher transactional volumes in our full service
and self-directed brokerage businesses also contributed to the increases.
Insurance-related
revenue increased $78 million, or 2%, primarily reflecting growth in our
Canadian life business and European life reinsurance business. This was partially offset by lower
revenue in our U.S. life business largely due to lower annuity sales, the negative impact of a
stronger Canadian dollar on the translated value of our U.S. dollar-denominated revenue and lower
revenue from property catastrophe reinsurance reflecting our strategic reduction in exposure, as we
ceased underwriting new business.
Banking revenue was up $65 million, or 3%, mainly due to higher service fees, higher credit
fees related to our investment banking activity and increased foreign exchange revenue due to
higher transaction volume. These factors were partially offset by higher customer loyalty reward
program costs that were recorded against revenue.
Trading revenue increased by $980 million, or 61%. Total trading revenue was $2,035 million,
up $420 million, or 26%, from a year ago largely due to record trading results on improved market
conditions and growth in certain equity trading strategies. This was partly offset by higher
funding costs in support of growth in certain equity trading strategies.
Underwriting and other advisory revenue decreased $2 million on lower equity origination in
Canada mainly reflecting slower activity outside the resource sector and lower debt origination
largely in the U.S. due to the rising interest rate environment. These factors were largely offset
by stronger M&A activity.
Other revenue decreased $100 million, or 12%, largely due to a number of favourable items
recorded in 2005 including the gain on the sale of an Enron-related claim, a cumulative accounting
adjustment related to our ownership interest in an investment and the gain on the sale of LIS.
These factors were partially offset by the receipt of a fee related to the termination of an
agreement and the net gain on the exchange of our NYSE seats for NYX
shares, which were both recorded in 2006.
Net interest income and margin
Table 8
(C$ millions, except percentage amounts)
2007
2006
2005
Net interest income
$
7,532
$
6,796
$
6,793
Average assets (1)
581,000
502,100
445,300
Net interest margin (2)
1.30
%
1.35
%
1.53
%
(1)
Average amounts are calculated using methods intended to approximate the average of the daily
balances for the period.
(2)
Net interest income as a percentage of average assets.
Royal Bank of Canada: Annual Report 2007
46 Management’s Discussion and Analysis
Asset purchased under reverse repurchase
agreements and securities borrowed
783
(160
)
623
404
1,069
1,473
Loans
Canada
Retail
1,025
194
1,219
697
423
1,120
Wholesale
—
(217
)
(217
)
146
(144
)
2
United States
348
(218
)
130
108
376
484
Other International
778
106
884
172
140
312
Total interest income
$
3,959
$
214
$
4,173
$
2,468
$
2,755
$
5,223
Liabilities
Deposits
Canada
$
(1
)
$
646
$
645
$
122
$
1,178
$
1,300
United States
264
281
545
238
733
971
Other International
1,344
528
1,872
754
737
1,491
Obligations related to securities sold short
386
(460
)
(74
)
197
493
690
Obligations related to assets sold under
repurchase agreements and securities loaned
542
(60
)
482
341
421
762
Subordinated debentures
(66
)
(15
)
(81
)
(18
)
(5
)
(23
)
Other interest-bearing liabilities
89
(41
)
48
(115
)
144
29
Total interest expense
$
2,558
$
879
$
3,437
$
1,519
$
3,701
$
5,220
Net interest income
$
1,401
$
(665
)
$
736
$
949
$
(946
)
$
3
(1)
Geographic classification for selected assets and liabilities is based on the domicile of the
booking point of the subject assets and liabilities.
(2)
Volume/rate variance is allocated on the percentage relationship of changes in balances and
changes in rates to the total net change in net interest income.
(3)
Available-for-sale securities are carried at fair value. Prior to November 1, 2006,
Available-for-sale securities were classified as investment securities and were carried at
amortized cost.
2007 vs. 2006
Net interest margin decreased 5 bps reflecting the impact of changes in product mix, an increase in
lower-yielding and non-interest-earning assets, competitive pressures on our U.S. deposit business,
and the reversal of accrued interest on higher impaired loans in the U.S.
Net interest income increased $736 million, or 11%, largely driven by strong loan and deposit
growth in our banking businesses.
As noted in Table 9, we experienced higher growth in lower-yielding and non-interest-earning
assets, including trading securities and assets purchased under reverse repurchase agreements and
securities borrowed largely in support of our trading and other business activities, which generate
non-interest income. For further details, refer to Table 58 in the Additional financial information
section.
2006 vs. 2005
Net interest margin decreased 18 bps compared to 2005, reflecting lower net interest income due to
higher funding costs in support of growth in certain equity trading strategies. An increase in
lower-yielding and non-interest-earning assets, which generate non-interest income, largely in
support of our trading and other business activities also contributed to the decrease. This
decrease was partially offset by stronger loan and deposit growth and increased spreads on deposits
and personal investment products.
Non-interest expense
Table 10
(C$ millions)
2007
2006
2005
Salaries
$
3,541
$
3,192
$
3,101
Variable compensation
2,975
2,827
2,309
Stock-based compensation
194
169
169
Benefits and retention compensation
1,150
1,080
1,103
Human resources
$
7,860
$
7,268
$
6,682
Equipment
1,009
957
960
Occupancy
839
792
749
Communications
723
687
632
Professional and other external services
838
844
796
Other expenses
1,204
947
1,538
Non-interest expense
$
12,473
$
11,495
$
11,357
Royal Bank of Canada: Annual Report 2007
Management’s Discussion and Analysis 47
Non-interest expense increased $978 million, or 9%, compared to the prior year, primarily
reflecting higher costs due to increased business levels, which included additional sales and
service personnel and higher variable compensation on higher commission-based revenue in Wealth
Management. Increased sundry losses and higher processing and system development costs also
contributed to the increase. Additional costs in support of our growth initiatives, including our
recent acquisitions, and de novo branch expansion and branch upgrade programs also contributed to
the increase. These factors were partially offset by the favourable impact of a stronger Canadian
dollar on the translated value of the U.S. dollar-denominated expenses and lower variable
compensation in Capital Markets commensurate with weaker results.
2006 vs. 2005
Non-interest expense increased $138 million, or 1%, compared to 2005, largely reflecting higher
variable compensation primarily in our Capital Markets and Wealth Management segments due to strong
business performance. Higher costs in support of our growth initiatives, including a higher level
of sales personnel and infrastructure in our distribution network, increased costs related to
systems application development, higher marketing and advertising costs and a larger number of
branches also contributed to the increase. These factors were partially offset by the reduction in
the translated value of U.S. dollar-denominated expenses due to the stronger Canadian dollar. The
Enron litigation-related provision and the settlement of the Enron MegaClaims bankruptcy lawsuit
were recorded in 2005.
Provision for credit losses
Table 11
(C$ millions)
2007
2006
2005
Residential mortgages
$
13
$
6
$
2
Personal
364
306
259
Credit cards
223
163
194
Small business (1)
34
29
27
Retail
$
634
$
504
$
482
Business (2)
148
(22
)
(93
)
Sovereign (3)
—
—
—
Bank
—
—
—
Wholesale
148
(22
)
(93
)
Specific provision
$
782
$
482
$
389
General provision
9
(53
)
66
Provision for credit losses
$
791
$
429
$
455
Specific PCL as a % of average net loans and acceptances
.33
%
.23
%
.21
%
(1)
Includes small business exposure managed on a pooled basis.
(2)
Includes small business exposure managed on an individual client basis.
(3)
Sovereign refers to all central governments and agencies, central banks, as well as other
qualifying public sector entities and multilateral development banks.
2007 vs. 2006
Total provision for credit losses (PCL) increased $362 million, or 84%, compared to the prior year,
which had been at a cyclically low level, and has trended up towards the historical average. The
increase reflected higher provisions for both of our wholesale and retail loan portfolios,
primarily reflecting portfolio growth and higher impaired loans in our U.S. residential
builder finance business triggered by the downturn in the U.S. housing market. Specific PCL as a
percentage of average net loans and acceptances increased from a year ago, largely reflecting
higher impaired loans in our U.S. residential builder finance business.
Specific PCL for retail loans was up $130 million, or 26%, from a year ago. The increase was
primarily attributable to higher provisions in our credit cards and personal unsecured credit line
portfolios, largely reflecting higher loss rates and portfolio growth.
Specific PCL for wholesale loans increased $170 million over the prior year. The increase was
largely attributable to our business portfolio mainly due to higher impaired loans in our U.S.
residential builder finance business and higher write-offs in Canada. Lower recoveries in our
corporate loan portfolio this year also contributed to the increase in provisions.
The general provision increased $62 million from a year ago, primarily reflecting a $50
million reversal of the general allowance related to our corporate loan portfolio in the prior
year. Higher provisions in our U.S. residential builder finance business loan portfolio,
largely reflecting a weakening in credit quality as a result of the
downturn in the U.S. housing
market, also contributed to the increase.
2006 vs. 2005
Provision for credit losses decreased $26 million, or 6%, from 2005. The decrease largely reflected
a $50 million reversal of the general allowance in 2006 related to our corporate loan portfolio in
Capital Markets, in light of the continued favourable credit conditions and the strengthening of
the credit quality of our corporate portfolio, the favourable impact of the higher level of
securitized credit cards, and the continued strong credit quality of our U.S. loan portfolio. In
2005, we also recorded a provision related to our 50% proportionate share of a provision booked at
Moneris Solutions, Inc. (Moneris). These factors were partially offset by higher provisions for our
Canadian personal loan and small business portfolios, as well as lower recoveries in our corporate
and agriculture loan portfolios.
Insurance policyholder benefits, claims and acquisition
expense
Table 12
(C$ millions)
2007
2006
2005
Insurance policyholder benefits and claims
$
1,588
$
1,939
$
2,103
Insurance policyholder acquisition expense
585
570
522
Insurance policyholder benefits, claims and acquisition expense
$
2,173
$
2,509
$
2,625
Royal Bank of Canada: Annual Report 2007
48 Management’s Discussion and Analysis
Insurance policyholder benefits, claims and acquisition expense (PBCAE) decreased $336 million, or
13%, from the prior year. Excluding the impact of the new financial instruments accounting
standards and the prior year hurricane-related charges, PBCAE decreased $121 million, or 5%, over
last year. The decrease was largely attributable to the impact of lower U.S. annuity sales and a
higher level of favourable net actuarial liability adjustments this year, which included cumulative
adjustments of $92 million related to prior periods. These factors were partially offset by
increased costs commensurate with growth in our European life reinsurance and Canadian businesses.
For a reconciliation of PBCAE excluding the impact of the new financial instruments accounting
standards, refer to the Key performance and non-GAAP measures section.
2006 vs. 2005
PBCAE decreased $116 million, or 4%, compared to 2005. The decrease primarily reflected a $142
million (before- and after-tax) reduction in hurricane-related charges for net claims, as we
recorded $203 million in 2005 related to hurricanes Katrina, Rita and Wilma and $61 million for
additional claims in 2006 predominantly related to hurricane Wilma. The favourable impact on the
translated value of U.S. dollar-denominated actuarial liabilities as a result of the stronger
Canadian dollar and lower U.S. annuity sales also contributed to the decrease. These factors were
partially offset by higher benefits and claims costs associated with business growth and a reduced
level of net favourable actuarial liability adjustments in 2006.
Taxes
Table 13
(C$ millions, except percentage amounts)
2007
2006
2005
Income taxes
$
1,392
$
1,403
$
1,278
Other taxes
Goods and services and sales taxes
$
208
$
218
$
218
Payroll taxes
227
217
220
Capital taxes
117
107
164
Property taxes (1)
97
92
93
Insurance premium taxes
41
39
39
Business taxes
8
7
9
698
680
743
Total income and other taxes
$
2,090
$
2,083
$
2,021
Net income before income taxes
$
7,025
$
6,204
$
4,702
Effective
income tax rate (2)
19.8
%
22.6
%
27.2
%
Effective total tax rate (3)
27.1
%
30.3
%
37.1
%
(1)
Includes amounts netted against non-interest income regarding investment properties.
(2)
Income taxes, as a percentage of net income before income taxes.
(3)
Total income and other taxes as a percentage of net income before income and other taxes.
Our operations are subject to a variety of taxes, including taxes on income and capital
assessed by Canadian federal and provincial governments and taxes on income assessed by the
governments of international jurisdictions where we operate. Taxes are also assessed on
expenditures and supplies consumed in support of our operations.
2007 vs. 2006
Income tax expense decreased $11 million, or 1%, from a year ago, despite higher earnings before
income taxes. The effective tax rate of 19.8% compared favourably to 22.6% a year ago. The lower
effective tax rate was largely due to writedowns on the valuation of U.S. sub-prime RMBS and CDOs
of ABS reported by our subsidiaries operating in jurisdictions with higher income tax rates, the
gain related to the Visa Inc. restructuring, which is taxed at the
capital gains tax rate, and a
higher level of income from tax-advantaged sources (Canadian taxable corporate dividends).
Other taxes increased by $18 million from a year ago, largely due to increased payroll taxes
reflecting higher staffing levels and higher capital taxes due to an increased Canadian capital tax
base on which capital taxes are levied. Increased property taxes reflecting a higher number of
branches also contributed to the increase. These factors were partially offset by lower goods and
services and sales taxes due to a decrease in the goods and services tax (GST) rate.
In addition to the income and other taxes reported in our Consolidated Statements of Income,
we recorded income taxes of $946 million in 2007 (2006 — $136 million) in Shareholders’ equity, an
increase of $810 million, primarily reflecting an increase in unrealized foreign currency
translation gains as shown in Note 24 to our Consolidated Financial Statements.
2006 vs. 2005
Income taxes were up in 2006 compared to 2005, largely reflecting higher earnings and the impact of
the Enron litigation-related provision recorded in 2005. The effective income tax rate for 2006
decreased 4.6% primarily due to higher earnings reported by our subsidiaries operating in
jurisdictions with lower income tax rates, a higher level of income from tax-advantaged sources
(Canadian taxable corporate dividends), and the favourable resolution of income tax audits in 2006
related to prior years.
Other taxes decreased $63 million, largely due to lower capital taxes primarily related to
recoveries of capital taxes paid in prior periods and a lower Canadian capital base on which
capital taxes are levied.
Royal Bank of Canada: Annual Report 2007
Management’s Discussion and Analysis 49
Insurance policyholder benefits,
claims and acquisition expense
1,230
474
469
2,173
1,379
683
447
2,509
1,270
809
546
2,625
Non-interest expense
7,409
3,405
1,659
12,473
7,056
3,038
1,401
11,495
6,685
3,595
1,077
11,357
Business realignment charges
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
45
—
—
45
Income taxes and
non-controlling interest
1,788
(13
)
(242
)
1,533
1,495
13
(61
)
1,447
1,299
(64
)
30
1,265
Net income from continuing
operations
$
3,917
$
778
$
797
$
5,492
$
3,177
$
799
$
781
$
4,757
$
2,774
$
200
$
463
$
3,437
Net income (loss) from
discontinued operations
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
(29
)
$
—
$
(29
)
$
—
$
(50
)
$
—
$
(50
)
Net income
$
3,917
$
778
$
797
$
5,492
$
3,177
$
770
$
781
$
4,728
$
2,774
$
150
$
463
$
3,387
(1)
For geographic reporting, our segments are grouped into Canada, United States and Other
International. Transactions are primarily recorded in the location that best reflects the risk
due to negative changes in economic conditions and prospects for growth due to positive
economic changes. This location frequently corresponds with the location of the legal entity
through which the business is conducted and the location of our clients. Transactions are
recorded in the local currency and are subject to foreign exchange rate fluctuations with
respect to the movement of the Canadian dollar.
2007 vs. 2006
Net income in Canada was $3,917 million, up $740 million, or 23%, compared to the prior year. This
increase largely reflected strong volume and balance growth in our domestic banking and wealth
management businesses and a gain related to the Visa Inc. restructuring. Higher trading results,
improved equity origination activity and higher loan syndication activity also contributed to the
increase. These factors were partially offset by higher costs reflecting increased business levels
and in support of growth initiatives, higher provisions for credit losses and higher credit card
customer loyalty reward program costs this year.
U.S. net income of $778 million was up $8 million, or 1%, from the prior year. Solid revenue
growth reflecting the inclusion of our recent acquisitions and improved equity origination and M&A
activity was mostly offset by the negative impact of the stronger Canadian dollar on the translated
value of our U.S. dollar-denominated earnings, higher costs in support of business growth and
higher provision for credit losses, which primarily reflected higher impaired loans in our U.S.
residential builder finance business.
Other international net income of $797 million was up $16 million, or 2%, from 2006, partly
due to stronger insurance results reflecting the absence of hurricane-related charges this year and
a favourable adjustment related to the reallocation of certain foreign investment capital this
year. Growth at RBC Dexia IS also contributed to the increase. These factors were largely offset by
lower trading results in certain fixed income businesses as a result
of writedowns on the valuation of
U.S. subprime RMBS and CDOs of ABS.
2006 vs. 2005
Net income in Canada was $3,177 million, up $403 million, or 15%, compared to 2005. This increase
largely reflected strong revenue growth in our wealth management and banking businesses due to our
successful execution of growth initiatives, the continuing favourable economic conditions and
stronger M&A activity. These factors were partly offset by higher variable compensation on stronger
business performance and increased costs in support of business growth.
U.S. net income of $770 million was up $620 million, or 413%, from 2005 and comprises net
income from continuing operations of $799 million and a net loss from discontinued operations of
$29 million. U.S. net income from continuing operations was up $599 million, or 300%, compared to
2005 largely reflecting the Enron litigation-related provision and strong trading results in 2006.
These factors were partially offset by lower debt originations, lower U.S. annuity sales, the
negative impact of the stronger Canadian dollar on the translated value of U.S. dollar-denominated
income and the gain recorded in the prior year on the sale of LIS in 2005.
Net loss from discontinued operations of $29 million in 2006 compared to a net loss of $50
million in 2005. The 2006 net loss reflected charges related to the wind down of operations of RBC
Mortgage Company. The 2005 net loss largely reflected charges related to the sale and wind down of
operations, including the costs of closing RBC Mortgage Company’s Chicago office and certain
branches, employee incentive payments and the write down of certain assets.
Other international net income was up $318 million, or 69%, from 2005, mainly reflecting the
lower net estimated hurricane-related charges and income tax amounts, which were largely related to
enterprise-funding activities and solid business growth in our European life reinsurance business.
These factors were partially offset by lower revenue from property catastrophe reinsurance
reflecting our strategic reduction in exposure.
Related party transactions
In the ordinary course of business, we provide normal banking services, operational services
and enter into other transactions with associated and other related corporations, including our
joint venture entities, on terms similar to those offered to non-related parties.
We grant loans to directors, officers and other employees at rates normally accorded to
preferred clients. In addition, we offer deferred share and other plans to non-employee directors,
executives and certain other key employees. For further information, refer to Notes 9 and 29 to our
Consolidated Financial Statements.
Royal Bank of Canada: Annual Report
2007
Management’s Discussion and Analysis 50
Our quarterly earnings, revenue and expenses are impacted by a number of trends and
recurring factors which include seasonality, general economic conditions and competition. The following table summarizes our results for the
last eight quarters.
Quarterly results
Table 15
2007
2006
(C$ millions, except per share amounts)
Q4
Q3
Q2
Q1
Q4
Q3
Q2
Q1
Net interest income
$
1,828
$
1,965
$
1,889
$
1,850
$
1,731
$
1,766
$
1,617
$
1,682
Non-interest income
3,787
3,515
3,780
3,848
3,618
3,440
3,505
3,278
Total revenue
$
5,615
$
5,480
$
5,669
$
5,698
$
5,349
$
5,206
$
5,122
$
4,960
Non-interest expense
3,093
3,165
3,148
3,067
2,955
2,861
2,928
2,751
Provision for credit losses
263
178
188
162
159
99
124
47
Insurance policyholder benefits,
claims and acquisition expense
637
343
677
516
611
627
619
652
Net income before income taxes and
non-controlling interest in subsidiaries
$
1,622
$
1,794
$
1,656
$
1,953
$
1,624
$
1,619
$
1,451
$
1,510
Income taxes
255
349
353
435
342
381
348
332
Non-controlling interest in net income
of subsidiaries
43
50
24
24
19
44
(25
)
6
Net income from continuing operations
$
1,324
$
1,395
$
1,279
$
1,494
$
1,263
$
1,194
$
1,128
$
1,172
Net income (loss) from discontinued operations
—
—
—
—
(1
)
(17
)
(10
)
(1
)
Net income
$
1,324
$
1,395
$
1,279
$
1,494
$
1,262
$
1,177
$
1,118
$
1,171
Earnings per share — basic
$
1.02
$
1.07
$
.99
$
1.16
$
.97
$
.91
$
.86
$
.90
— diluted
$
1.01
$
1.06
$
.98
$
1.14
$
.96
$
.90
$
.85
$
.89
Segment net income (loss)
Canadian Banking
$
899
$
699
$
618
$
771
$
675
$
660
$
511
$
580
Wealth Management
180
177
194
211
164
136
159
145
U.S. & International Banking
21
87
67
67
79
82
62
38
Capital Markets
186
360
350
396
300
303
414
338
Corporate Support
38
72
50
49
45
13
(18
)
71
Net income
$
1,324
$
1,395
$
1,279
$
1,494
$
1,263
$
1,194
$
1,128
$
1,172
Period average USD equivalent of C$1.00 (1)
$
1.001
$
.937
$
.874
$
.861
$
.897
$
.896
$
.877
$
.865
Period-end USD equivalent of C$1.00
1.059
.937
.901
.850
.890
.884
.894
.878
(1)
Average amounts are calculated using methods intended to approximate the average of
the daily balances for the period.
Seasonality
Seasonal factors impact our results in most quarters. The second quarter has fewer days than the
other three quarters, resulting in a decrease primarily in net interest income and certain expense
items. The third and fourth quarters include the summer months during which market activity
frequently slows, negatively impacting the results of our capital markets, brokerage and investment
management businesses.
Impact of economic and market conditions
In general, economic conditions remained favourable over most of the last eight quarters and
positively impacted our businesses. Economic conditions were negatively impacted in the latter part
of 2007, mainly attributable to the U.S. subprime mortgage market concerns. For a further
discussion, refer to the Overview of 2007 section.
The strengthening of the Canadian dollar over the period resulted in lower translated value of
our U.S. dollar-denominated earnings, primarily in our wholesale banking business and U.S. retail
operations.
Overview and consolidated results
Over the last eight quarters, our results were affected by a number of favourable and unfavourable
items or events. Our fourth quarter 2007 results were impacted by the
writedowns on the
valuation of U.S. subprime RMBS and CDOs of ABS, the gain related to the Visa Inc. restructuring,
and higher credit card customer loyalty reward program costs. In the
first quarter of 2007 we recorded a favourable adjustment
related to the reallocation of foreign investment capital and our insurance business results were negatively impacted by hurricane-related
charges of $61 million (before- and after-tax). During the same quarter, we also recorded a $50
million reversal of the general allowance in light of the strong credit quality of our corporate
loan portfolio, which partially reflected the favourable credit conditions. Our results over the
last eight quarters were also impacted by the acquisition of certain businesses. For further
discussion, refer to the Overview of 2007 section.
Our consolidated net income consistently exceeded $1 billion over the last eight quarters.
These strong results largely reflected a general increase in revenue across all our business
segments. This positive trend was partially offset by the lower translated value of foreign
currency-denominated revenue and earnings as a result of the strengthening of the Canadian dollar
against the U.S. dollar during most of the period, with the effects being more pronounced in the
most recent quarter.
Non-interest expense generally increased over the last eight quarters, largely reflecting
increased variable compensation on strong business performance and higher costs due to increased
business activity volume, acquisitions and higher spending in support of our growth initiatives.
Provision
for credit losses was at a cyclically low level during most of the period,
primarily reflecting a generally benign credit environment and favourable corporate recoveries.
However, it increased over the past year due to portfolio growth, as well as increasing
loss rates and higher impairments, both of which have trended up towards historical averages.
In the fourth quarter of 2007, the provision
for
Royal Bank of Canada: Annual Report 2007
Management’s Discussion and Analysis 51
credit
losses increased in our U.S. & International Banking segment due to higher impaired loans,
primarily driven by the downturn in the U.S. housing market. The decrease in provisions in the
first quarter of 2006 was primarily due to a $50 million reversal of the general allowance in
light of the strong credit quality of our corporate loan portfolio at that time.
PBCAE fluctuated considerably over the period. Although underlying business growth has
generally increased PBCAE, there can be significant quarterly volatility resulting from claims
experience, actuarial liability adjustments and capital market impacts on equities backing
universal life policyholder funds. The impact of the new financial instruments accounting standards
implemented in the first quarter of 2007 introduced additional volatility to this line. Other than
claims experience and actuarial liability adjustments, these items are predominantly offset in
Insurance-related revenue. As well, the first quarter of 2006 was impacted by hurricane-related
charges.
Our effective income tax rate has generally trended downward from 22.0% to 15.7% over the
period, despite higher earnings before income taxes. This largely reflected higher income from
tax-advantaged sources (Canadian taxable corporate dividends), favourable income tax settlements in
the first quarter of 2006 and the second and third quarters of 2007. The fourth quarter of 2007
reflected writedowns on the valuation of U.S. subprime RMBS and CDOs of ABS reported by our
subsidiaries operations in jurisdictions with higher income tax rates and a lower tax rate on the
gain related to the Visa Inc. restructuring.
Non-controlling interest in net income of subsidiaries fluctuated over the period, which
depends on the net income attributed to third-party investors in entities in which we do not have
100% ownership, but are required to consolidate.
Business segment results
Canadian Banking net income generally increased over the last eight quarters reflecting strong
volume growth across most business lines. Margins have decreased slightly over the latter part of
2007, primarily due to strong market competition. Our results in the fourth quarter of 2007 were
favourably impacted by the gain related to the Visa Inc. restructuring, which was partly offset by
higher credit card customer loyalty reward program costs. Also, the first quarter of 2007 was
positively impacted by a favourable adjustment related to the reallocation of foreign investment
capital while the first quarter of 2006 was adversely impacted by hurricane-related charges.
Wealth Management net income has generally trended higher over the last eight quarters, driven
largely by strong growth in fee-based client assets across all business lines reflecting new sales,
capital appreciation and the recruitment and retention of experienced advisors. This has been
partially offset by higher variable compensation commensurate with commission-based revenue and
higher costs in support of business growth, including recent acquisitions.
U.S. & International Banking results were generally stable during the period except for the
fourth quarter of 2007. The decrease in earnings in the fourth quarter of 2007 was primarily
attributable to the higher provisions in our U.S. residential builder finance loan portfolio
reflecting higher impaired loans. In addition, net
income was impacted by higher costs in support of business growth, including recent acquisitions
and de novo branch openings.
Capital Markets recorded a general improvement in earnings over the period, with the exception
of the fourth quarter of 2007, which was impacted by the writedowns on the valuation of U.S.
subprime RMBS and CDOs of ABS over concerns related to the U.S. subprime mortgage market.
Throughout 2006 and most of 2007, our diverse business and product offerings, together with
business expansions and growing global distribution capabilities, contributed to this positive
trend. However, these factors were partially offset by the lower translated value of U.S. dollar-
and British pound-denominated earnings resulting from the stronger Canadian dollar.
FOURTH QUARTER 2007 PERFORMANCE
Fourth quarter net income of $1,324 million was up $62 million, or 5%, from a year ago
despite the $48 million unfavourable impact of the stronger Canadian dollar on the translated value
of U.S. dollar-denominated earnings. Diluted EPS were $1.01, up 5%. ROE was 23.0% compared to 23.9%
a year ago. The increase was primarily due to a gain on the Visa Inc. restructuring, higher equity
derivatives and foreign exchange trading results and solid volume and balance growth in our banking
and wealth management businesses. These factors were partly offset by writedowns on the valuation
of U.S. subprime RMBS and CDOs of ABS, and an adjustment to increase our credit card customer
loyalty reward program costs.
Total revenue increased $266 million, or 5%, from a year ago, largely reflecting a gain on the
Visa Inc. restructuring, higher equity derivatives and foreign exchange trading revenue and
continued solid volume and balance growth in our banking and wealth management businesses. The
favourable impact of the new financial instruments accounting standards, the inclusion of recent
acquisitions and improved M&A activity also contributed to the increase. These factors were partly
offset by lower trading revenue in our fixed income businesses reflecting the writedowns on the
valuation of U.S. subprime RMBS and CDOs of ABS and an adjustment to increase our credit card
customer loyalty reward program costs.
Non-interest expense increased $138 million, or 5%, from a year ago, largely reflecting higher
costs in support of our business initiatives, including higher staffing levels, our recent
acquisitions and de novo branch openings. These factors were partially offset by lower variable
compensation in Capital Markets due to weaker results.
Provision for credit losses increased $104 million from a year ago, largely reflecting higher
impaired loans in our U.S. residential builder finance business portfolio, primarily driven by
the downturn in the U.S. housing market. Higher provisions commensurate with growth in our credit
card portfolio and higher impairment in our business portfolio also contributed to the increase.
PBCAE
increased $26 million,
or 4%, over the prior year, primarily due to the impact of the new financial instruments accounting
standards, increased costs associated with growth in our European life reinsurance business as well
as less favourable claims experience in the current period. These factors were partly offset by
reduced expenses associated with lower U.S. annuity sales, a higher level of favourable net
actuarial liability adjustments, and the favourable impact of a stronger Canadian dollar on the
translated value of U.S. dollar-denominated expenses.
Royal Bank of Canada: Annual Report 2007
52 Management’s Discussion and Analysis
Insurance policyholder benefits,
claims and acquisition expense
2,173
—
—
—
—
2,173
2,509
2,625
Business realignment charges
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
45
Net income before income taxes and
non-controlling interest in net income
of subsidiaries
$
4,275
$
1,089
$
325
$
1,642
$
(306
)
$
7,025
$
6,204
$
4,702
Net income
$
2,987
$
762
$
242
$
1,292
$
209
$
5,492
$
4,757
$
3,437
Return on equity (ROE) (2)
34.3
%
32.4
%
6.9
%
26.6
%
6.7
%
24.6
%
23.5
%
18.0
%
Return on risk capital (RORC) (2)
45.5
%
65.1
%
11.7
%
32.5
%
n.m.
37.4
%
36.7
%
29.3
%
Average assets (3)
$
220,000
$
16,600
$
39,700
$
311,200
$
(6,500
)
$
581,000
$
502,300
$
447,100
(1)
Net interest income, total revenue and net income before income taxes are presented in
Capital Markets on a taxable equivalent basis. The taxable equivalent basis adjustment is
eliminated in the Corporate Support segment. For a further discussion, refer to the How we
measure and report our business segments section.
(2)
Average risk capital and the Return on risk capital are key performance measures. For further
details, refer to Key performance and non-GAAP measures section.
(3)
Average amounts are calculated using methods intended to
approximate the average of the daily balances for the period.
n.m.
not meaningful
Canadian Banking
Net income increased $561 million, or 23%, from a year ago. The increase primarily reflected strong
growth across all our business lines as well as a gain
related to the Visa Inc. restructuring, partially offset by higher costs in support of business
growth, increased provision for credit losses and higher credit card customer loyalty reward
program costs this year. Our prior year results also included the hurricane-related charges and the
receipt of a fee related to the termination of an agreement, whereas this year we included a
favourable adjustment related to the reallocation of certain foreign investment capital.
Wealth Management
Net income for the year of $762 million increased $158 million, or 26%, from a year ago. The
increase was largely due to strong earnings growth across all our business lines reflecting the
ongoing successful execution of our growth initiatives and generally favourable market conditions.
We recorded a foreign exchange translation gain on certain
deposits in the current year related to the implementation of the new financial instruments
accounting standards.
U.S. & International Banking
Net income decreased $19 million, or 7%, from the prior year. The decrease was largely attributable
to increased provision for credit losses, primarily reflecting higher impaired loans in our U.S.
residential builder finance business. This was partially offset by strong business growth in
RBC Dexia IS, as well as higher loan and
deposit growth in the U.S. reflecting the inclusion of our acquisitions of Flag and the AmSouth
branches, de novo branch openings and business expansion. Our results also reflected higher costs
in support of business growth and a loss on the restructuring of our U.S. banking investment
portfolio this year.
Capital Markets
Net income
decreased $63 million, or 5%, compared to a year ago largely due
to the writedowns on the valuation of U.S. subprime RMBS and CDOs of ABS in our Structured Credit
business. The negative impact of the stronger Canadian dollar on the translated value of U.S.
dollar-denominated earnings also contributed to the decrease. These factors were partially offset
by broad-based revenue growth in many other businesses.
Corporate Support
Net income of $209 million for the year included income tax amounts largely related to enterprise
funding activities that were not allocated to the business segments and favourable income tax
settlements related to prior years. These factors were partially offset by the mark-to-market
losses on derivatives relating to certain economic hedges, a cumulative adjustment for losses
resulting from the fair valuing of certain derivatives that did not qualify for hedge accounting
and higher capital taxes that were not allocated to the business segments.
Royal Bank of Canada: Annual Report 2007
Management’s Discussion and Analysis 53
Our management reporting framework is intended to measure the performance of each business segment
as if it were a stand-alone business and reflect the way that business segment is managed. This
approach is intended to ensure that our business segments’ results reflect all relevant revenue and
expenses associated with the conduct of their business and it depicts how management views those
results.
The following highlights the key aspects of how our business segments are managed and
reported:
•
Canadian Banking reported results include securitized Canadian residential mortgage and
credit card loans and related amounts for income and provision for credit losses. The
securitized residential mortgage and credit card loans included as at October 31, 2007 were
$19 billion and $4 billion, respectively
•
Wealth Management reported results include additional disclosures in U.S. dollars for its
U.S. & International Wealth Management business line, as we review and manage the
results of this business line largely in U.S. dollars
•
U.S. & International Banking reported results include additional disclosure in U.S. dollars
for its Banking business line, as we review and manage the results of this business
line largely on a U.S. dollar basis
•
Capital Markets results are reported on a taxable equivalent basis (teb), which grosses up
Net interest income from certain tax-advantaged sources (Canadian taxable corporate dividends)
to their effective taxable equivalent value with a corresponding offset recorded in the
provision for income taxes. This increases comparability between taxable and tax-advantaged
sources of revenue
•
Corporate Support results include all enterprise level activities
that are undertaken for the benefit of the organization that are
not allocated to our four business segments, such as enterprise
funding, securitizations and net charges associated with unattributed capital. The reported results of the Corporate Support
segment also reflect consolidation adjustments, including the
elimination of the teb adjustments recorded in Capital Markets.
Key methodologies
The following outlines the key methodologies and assumptions used in our management reporting
framework. These assumptions and methodologies are periodically reviewed by management to ensure
they remain valid.
Expense allocation
In order to ensure that our business segments’ results include expenses associated with the conduct
of their business, we allocate costs incurred or services provided by GTO and Global Functions,
which are directly undertaken or provided on the business segments’ behalf. For other costs not
directly attributable to our business segments, including overhead costs and other indirect
expenses, we use our management reporting framework for allocating these costs to each business
segment in a manner that reflects the underlying benefits.
Capital attribution
Our framework also assists in the attribution of capital to our business segments in a manner that
is intended to consistently measure and align economic costs with the underlying benefits and risks
associated with the activities of each business segment. The amount of capital assigned to each
business segment is referred to as attributed capital. Unattributed capital and associated net
charges, are reported in Corporate Support.
The capital attribution methodologies, detailed in the Capital management section, involve a
number of assumptions and estimates that involve judgment and are revised periodically. Any
changes to these factors directly impact other measures such as business segment return on average
common equity and return on average risk capital.
Funds
transfer pricing
Our funds transfer pricing methodology is used to allocate interest income and expense to each
business segment. This allocation considers the interest rate risk, liquidity risk and regulatory
requirements of our business segments. Our business segments may retain certain interest rate
exposures, subject to management approval, that would be expected in the normal course of
operations. Other activities conducted between our business segments are generally conducted at
market rates.
Taxable
equivalent basis (teb)
Similar to many other institutions, we analyze income from certain tax-advantaged sources (Canadian
taxable corporate dividends) on a taxable equivalent basis. Under this approach, we gross up
revenue from certain tax-advantaged sources, which currently only includes our Canadian taxable
corporate dividends recorded in Net interest income, to their effective taxable equivalent value
with a corresponding offset recorded in the provision for income taxes. We record teb adjustments
in Capital Markets and record elimination adjustments in Corporate Support. We believe these
adjustments are useful and reflect how Capital Markets manages its business since it increases the
comparability of revenue and related ratios across taxable and our principal tax-advantaged sources
of revenue. The use of teb adjustments and measures may not be comparable to similar GAAP measures
or similarly adjusted amounts at other financial institutions. The teb adjustment for 2007 was $332
million (2006 — $213 million, 2005 — $109 million).
Changes made in 2007
The following highlights the key changes we made to our management reporting framework and business
segments during the year. All segment results have been revised accordingly for 2006 and 2005.
These changes did not have an impact on our consolidated results or disclosure, unless otherwise
noted.
•
We revised the assets under administration — RBC Dexia IS amount for 2006 to reflect
the total assets under administration amount reported by our joint venture. We had previously
disclosed only the total assets under custody amount related to RBC Dexia IS.
•
We revised our definitions of assets under administration and assets under management to
better align them with our business-specific practices. This change did not impact the amounts
reported for 2006 and 2005.
•
We reclassified certain amounts reported in Capital Markets from Interest income to Interest
expense. There was no impact to Net interest income as a result of this reclassification.
•
We reclassified certain amounts reported in Corporate Support related to interest settlements
on swaps in fair value hedge relationships from Non-interest income to Net interest income.
This reclassification did not impact results for 2006 and 2005.
•
We reclassified certain deposits reported in Capital Markets and U.S. & International Banking
related to RBC Dexia IS, in accordance with the Q2 2007 business segment realignment.
•
We reclassified expenses related to internally developed software from Non-interest expense
— Other to more specific Non-interest expense lines. All
related comparative amounts were updated to reflect this reclassification, which impacted the Corporate Support segment
only, and had no impact on total Non-interest expense.
•
Certain amounts related to trustee services within Canadian
Banking were reclassified from Non-interest income — Investment management and custodial fees to Net
interest income to better reflect their nature.
Royal Bank of Canada: Annual Report 2007
54 Management’s Discussion and Analysis
IMPACT OF FOREIGN EXCHANGE RATES ON OUR BUSINESS SEGMENTS
The translated value of our business segment results is impacted by fluctuations in the respective
exchange rates relative to the Canadian dollar. Wealth Management, U.S. & International Banking and
Capital Markets each have significant U.S. dollar-denominated operations, while U.S. &
International Banking has material Euro-denominated results related to RBC Dexia IS, and
Capital Markets has significant British pound-denominated operations.
In 2007, the Canadian dollar appreciated 4% on average relative to the U.S. dollar and
depreciated 5% on average relative to both the British pound and Euro compared to a year ago. As a
result of the impact of the changes in the respective exchange rates from last year, Wealth
Management net income was down $9 million, U.S. & International Banking net income was up $4
million, while Capital Markets net income was down $30 million. For further discussion, refer to
the applicable business segment results section.
KEY PERFORMANCE AND NON-GAAP MEASURES
Key performance measures
Return on equity and Return on risk capital
We measure and evaluate the performance of our consolidated operations and each business segment
using a number of financial metrics such as net income, return on average common equity (ROE) and
return on average risk capital (RORC). We use ROE and RORC as a measure of return on total capital invested in our businesses. RORC does not have
a standardized meaning under GAAP and may not be comparable to similar measures used by other
financial institutions.
Our consolidated ROE calculation is based on net income available to common shareholders
divided by total average common equity for the period. Business segment ROE calculations are based
on annualized segment net income available to common shareholders divided by average attributed
capital for the period. For each segment, average attributed capital is based on attributed risk
capital and amounts invested in goodwill and intangibles (1).
The attribution of capital involves the use of assumptions, judgments and methodologies that
are regularly reviewed and revised by management as necessary. The attribution of risk capital is
based on certain assumptions, judgments and models that quantify economic risks as described in
the Economic Capital section. Changes to such assumptions, judgments and methodologies can have a material
effect on the segment ROE and RORC information that we report. Other companies that disclose information on similar attributions and
related return measures may use different assumptions, judgments and methodologies.
RORC is used to measure returns on
capital required to support the risks related to ongoing operations. Our RORC calculations are
based on net income available to common shareholders divided by attributed risk capital (which
excludes goodwill and intangibles and unattributed capital). The business segment ROE and RORC
measures are viewed as useful measures by management for supporting investment and resource allocation decisions
because they adjust for certain items that may affect comparability between business segments and
certain competitors. The following table provides a summary of the ROE and RORC calculations.
(1)
For internal allocation and measurement purposes, total attributed capital is deemed by
management to comprise amounts necessary to support the risks inherent in the businesses (risk
capital) and amounts related to historical investments (goodwill and intangibles). Total risk
capital and goodwill and intangibles are referred to as Attributed capital as well as Economic
Capital. The difference between total average common equity and average attributed capital is
classified as Unattributed capital and reported in Corporate Support for segment reporting
purposes.
Calculation of Return on equity and Return on risk capital
Table 17
2007
2006
2005
U.S. &
(C$ millions, except for percentage amounts) (1), (2)
Canadian Banking
Wealth Management
International Banking
Capital Markets
Corporate Support
Total
Total
Total
Net income available to common shareholders
$
2,953
$
753
$
228
$
1,272
$
198
$
5,404
$
4,668
$
3,349
Average risk capital (2)
$
6,500
$
1,150
$
1,950
$
3,900
$
950
$
14,450
$
12,750
$
11,450
Add:
Unattributed capital
—
—
—
—
2,000
2,000
2,500
2,300
Goodwill and intangible capital
2,100
1,150
1,400
900
—
5,550
4,650
4,850
Average equity (3)
$
8,600
$
2,300
$
3,350
$
4,800
$
2,950
$
22,000
$
19,900
$
18,600
Return on equity (ROE)
34.3
%
32.4
%
6.9
%
26.6
%
6.7
%
24.6
%
23.5
%
18.0
%
Return on risk capital (RORC)
45.5
%
65.1
%
11.7
%
32.5
%
n.m.
37.4
%
36.7
%
29.3
%
(1)
Average risk capital, Goodwill and intangible capital, and Average equity represent rounded
figures. These amounts are calculated using methods intended to approximate the average of the
daily balances for the period. ROE and RORC measures are based on actual balances before
rounding.
(2)
Average risk capital includes Credit, Market (trading and non-trading), Insurance,
Operational and Business and fixed assets risk capital. For further details refer to the
Capital management section.
(3)
The amounts for the segments are also referred to as attributed capital.
n.m.
not meaningful
Non-GAAP measures
Given the nature and purpose of our management reporting framework, we use certain non-GAAP
financial measures, which are not defined nor do they have standardized meaning under GAAP. Hence
these reported amounts and related ratios are not necessarily comparable with similar information
reported by other financial institutions.
2007
Defined operating leverage
Our defined operating leverage refers to the difference between our revenue growth rate (as
adjusted) and non-interest expense growth rate (as adjusted). Revenue is presented on a taxable
equivalent basis, while the impact of consolidated VIEs is excluded, as they have
no material impact on our earnings. Accounting adjustments related to the new financial instruments
accounting standards are also excluded from revenue as they give rise to volatility, primarily
relating to unrealized gains and losses arising from fair valuing of the instruments and are not
viewed as a measure of economic performance. Global Insurance results are excluded, as certain
changes in revenue can be largely offset in Insurance policyholder benefits, claims and acquisition
expense, which is not captured in our defined operating leverage calculation.
The
following table shows the defined operating leverage ratio calculation.
Royal Bank of Canada: Annual Report 2007
Management’s Discussion and Analysis 55
Less: Impact of the new financial instruments accounting standards (1)
83
—
Total revenue (adjusted)
$
19,488
$
17,509
11.3
%
Non-interest expense
$
12,473
$
11,495
Less: Global Insurance-related non-interest expense
537
517
Non-interest expense (adjusted)
$
11,936
$
10,978
8.7
%
Defined operating leverage
2.6
%
(1)
Excludes the impact of the new financial instruments accounting standards related to
Global Insurance.
Consolidated revenue and Insurance-related results excluding the impact of the new
financial instruments accounting standards and hurricane-related charges
In 2007 and 2006, there were certain items that impacted Total consolidated revenue, Global
Insurance and Insurance-related results. Management believes that identifying and adjusting for these items enhances
the comparability of our results, and enables a more meaningful comparison of our financial
performance with certain other financial institutions that make similar adjustments.
The following table provides a reconciliation of consolidated revenue, Global Insurance and
Insurance-related results excluding the impacts of the new financial instruments accounting
standards and the hurricane-related charges.
Consolidated revenue, Global Insurance and Insurance-related results excluding the noted items
Canadian Banking comprises our domestic personal and business banking operations, certain
retail investment businesses and our global insurance operations. This segment includes Personal
Financial Services, Business Financial Services, Cards and Payment Solutions, and Global Insurance.
Canadian Banking provides a broad suite of financial products and services to over 14 million
individual and business clients through our extensive branch, automated teller machine (ATM),
online and telephone banking networks, as well as through a large number of proprietary sales
professionals in addition to a wide-ranging third-party network of independent insurance
distributors.
We have top rankings in market share for most retail product categories and are the
largest Canadian bank-owned insurer.
Highlights
•
We launched new and innovative products to better serve
our clients through the introduction of a new personal banking suite that includes several
client-centric features, such as multi-product rebates, and a new high-interest online savings
account.
•
We strengthened our leading market position in personal lending, driven by 12% growth in
residential mortgages.
•
We continued to expand and upgrade our distribution network. We opened 30 bank branches and
12 insurance offices in Canada during the year.
Economic and market review
In Canada,
strong economic growth, in part reflecting solid consumer and business spending in the
early part of the year, weakened moderately in the latter part of the year, primarily due to
slowing U.S. demand and a tightening of credit conditions as a result of the U.S. subprime mortgage
market concerns. Nonetheless, robust domestic demand, largely underpinned by favourable labour
market conditions, solid business investment and continued strong Canadian housing market
activities, contributed to volume growth in all our businesses, particularly in the home equity
lending and retail investment businesses. Competition in the personal deposits market remained
strong from both traditional and niche financial institutions.
Canadian Banking financial highlights
Table 20
(C$ millions, except number of and percentage amounts)
2007
2006
2005
Net interest income
$
6,353
$
5,816
$
5,233
Non-interest income
6,168
5,880
5,765
Total revenue
$
12,521
$
11,696
$
10,998
Non-interest expense
5,285
5,027
4,830
Provision for credit losses (PCL)
788
604
542
Insurance policyholder benefits, claims and acquisition expense
2,173
2,509
2,625
Net income before income taxes and non-controlling interest in subsidiaries
Gross impaired loans as a percentage of average net loans and acceptances
.35
%
.33
%
.31
%
Specific PCL as a percentage of average net loans and acceptances
.39
%
.34
%
.34
%
Banking-related operations (6)
Total revenue
$
9,329
$
8,348
$
7,687
Provision for credit losses
788
604
542
Non-interest expense
4,748
4,510
4,329
Net income
2,545
2,124
1,852
Global insurance
Total revenue
$
3,192
$
3,348
$
3,311
Insurance policyholder benefits, claims and acquisition expense
2,173
2,509
2,625
Non-interest expense
537
517
501
Net income
442
302
155
(1)
Segment Return on equity, Average risk capital and Return on risk capital are key performance
measures. Average attributed capital and Return on equity are calculated using methods
intended to approximate the average of the daily balances for the period. For further
discussion, refer to the Key performance and non-GAAP measures section.
(2)
Net interest margin (NIM) is calculated as Net interest income divided by Average total
earning assets. Average total earning assets are calculated using methods intended to
approximate the average earning asset balances for the period.
(3)
Defined as the difference between revenue growth rate and non-interest expense growth rate for
Banking-related operations.
(4)
Average amounts are calculated using methods intended to approximate the average of the daily
balances for the period.
(5)
Total assets, Total earning assets, and Loans and acceptances include average securitized
residential mortgage and credit card loans for the year of $19 billion and $4 billion,
respectively (2006 — $15 billion and $4 billion; 2005 — $11 billion and $4 billion).
(6)
The banking-related operations of Canadian Banking comprise Personal Financial Services,
Business Financial Services, and Cards and Payment Solutions.
Royal Bank of Canada: Annual Report 2007
Management’s Discussion and Analysis 57
Net income increased $561 million, or 23%, from a year ago. The increase primarily reflected strong
growth across all our business lines as well as a $326 million ($269 million after-tax) gain
related to the Visa Inc. restructuring, partially offset by higher costs in support of business
growth, increased provision for credit losses and higher credit card customer loyalty reward
program costs, reflecting a $121 million ($79 million after-tax) liability adjustment this year as
compared to $72 million ($47 million after-tax) in the prior year. Our prior year results also
included the hurricane-related charges, and the receipt of a fee related to the termination of an
agreement, whereas this year we included a favourable adjustment related to the reallocation of
certain foreign investment capital.
Average assets increased $21 billion, or 10%, over the prior year. The increase was largely
attributable to strong loan growth, underpinned by our successful execution of growth initiatives,
robust domestic demand and continued solid Canadian housing market activities. Average deposits
were up $8 billion, or 6%, from a year ago, mainly due to growth in business deposits reflecting
high liquidity within Canadian businesses.
Banking-related operations
Banking-related operations net income was up $421 million, or 20%, compared to the prior year. The
increase was primarily due to solid growth across all business lines and a gain related to the Visa
Inc. restructuring. These factors were partially offset by higher costs in support of business
growth, increased provision for credit losses, the receipt of a fee related to the termination of
an agreement in the prior year, and higher credit card customer loyalty reward program costs this
year.
Total revenue was up $981 million, or 12%, over the prior year. The increase was largely
attributable to strong volume growth across all business lines, and the gain related to the Visa
Inc. restructuring. These factors were partly offset by the receipt of a fee related to the
termination of an agreement in the prior year and higher credit card customer loyalty reward
program costs this year.
Net interest margin decreased 5 bps from a year ago, primarily reflecting the impact of
changes in our product mix.
Non-interest expense increased $238 million, or 5%, compared to a year ago. The increase was
largely attributable to higher costs in support of business growth, including a 4% increase in
sales and service personnel, or approximately 900 staff, and de novo branch expansion, as well as
higher costs associated with system development, professional fees and sundry losses.
Provision for credit losses increased $184 million, or 30%, from last year, which had been at
a cyclically low level, and has trended up towards the historical average this year. The increase
was mainly attributable to higher provisions in our business, credit cards and personal loan
portfolios, reflecting higher loss rates and portfolio growth.
Global Insurance
Global Insurance net income increased $140 million, or 46%, compared to the prior year. The
increase was primarily related to the property catastrophe reinsurance business, reflecting the hurricane-related charges in the prior year, and a favourable
adjustment related to the reallocation of certain foreign investment
capital this year, which was partially
offset by lower income from this business as we exited this business
completely this year. A higher level of favourable net actuarial liability
adjustments and solid growth in our European life reinsurance business also contributed to the
increase. For a detailed discussion regarding Insurance policyholder benefits, claims and
acquisition expense, refer to the Global Insurance business line discussion.
2006 vs. 2005
Net income increased $419 million, or 21%, from 2005. The increase
primarily reflected solid revenue growth in our banking businesses
and lower hurricane-related charges in 2006. These factors were
partially offset by increased costs in support of business growth and
higher provision for credit losses partly due to loan growth and lower
recoveries.
Banking-related operations
Banking-related operations net income increased $272 million, or 15%, from 2005, largely reflecting
solid revenue growth across all business lines. The increase in net income was partly offset by
increased costs in support of business growth and higher provision for credit losses.
Total revenue increased $661 million, or 9%, from 2005. The increase was mainly due to strong
volume growth across all business lines, and improved deposit and investment spreads, underpinned
by our successful execution of growth initiatives and favourable economic conditions.
Net interest margin increased 1 bp compared to 2005, primarily reflecting improved spreads on
deposits and investment products.
Non-interest expense increased $181 million, or 4%, primarily due to higher levels of sales
and service personnel and infrastructure costs in our distribution network and increased marketing
costs in support of business growth.
Provision for credit losses increased $62 million, or 11%, largely reflecting higher
provisions in our personal loan portfolio, and lower recoveries in our agriculture loan portfolio
in 2006. In 2005, we included our 50% proportionate share of a provision recorded at Moneris.
Global Insurance
Global Insurance net income increased $147 million compared to 2005, largely reflecting a $142
million reduction in hurricane-related charges in 2006. In addition, business growth associated
with Canadian life business and European life reinsurance business, as well as improved claims
experience in our Canadian property and casualty business contributed to the increase. These
factors were partially offset by lower revenue from property catastrophe reinsurance business
reflecting our strategic reduction in exposure. For a detailed discussion regarding
Insurance-related revenue and Insurance policyholder benefits, claims and acquisition expense,
refer to the Financial performance section.
2008 Outlook and priorities
Canadian
economic growth is expected to weaken in 2008 due to tighter credit conditions, though credit
growth should continue to be supported by rising domestic demand amid expanding labour markets and
solid business investment. We will remain focused on new client acquisition and growth in
high-value markets, simplifying processes as well as augmenting our strengths in distribution
capabilities, product breadth and integration, and client analytics to provide superior client
service.
Key strategic priorities for 2008
•
Deliver a superior client experience to help clients achieve financial success, allowing us
to retain and grow their business.
•
Continue to improve our processes and revise our business models to make it easier for our
clients to do business with us.
•
Focus on delivering relevant advice and solutions to attract new clients in specific markets,
geographies and life stages.
Royal Bank of Canada: Annual Report 2007
58 Management’s Discussion and Analysis
Personal Financial Services focuses on meeting the needs of our individual clients at every
stage of their lives through a wide range of lending and investment products and services,
including home equity financing, lines of credit, personal loans, savings and chequing accounts,
guaranteed investment certificates (GICs), mutual funds and self-directed brokerage accounts. We
have the largest retail banking network in Canada with 1,146 branches and 3,946 ATMs. In addition,
we have more than 75 private bankers and 1,700 sales specialists. We also rank first or second in
market share for most personal banking products.
Financial performance
Total revenue increased $461 million, or 10%, over the prior year. The increase largely reflected
strong volume growth in home equity lending and retail investments, and improved spreads across
most products. Higher mutual fund distribution fees, reflecting a 18% growth in mutual fund
balances as a result of strong net sales and capital appreciation also contributed to the increase.
Average residential mortgage balances and personal loans were each up by 12% over the prior
year, supported by relatively low interest rates in a historical context, strong labour market
conditions and continued solid Canadian housing market activities. Average personal deposit
balances increased 6% from a year ago, notwithstanding an increasingly competitive market, in part
driven by the success of our recently launched high-interest online savings account.
Selected highlights
Table 21
(C$ millions)
2007
2006
2005
Total revenue
$
5,082
$
4,621
$
4,181
Other information
Residential mortgages (1)
113,200
100,800
89,700
Personal loans (1)
38,700
34,600
30,500
Personal deposits (1)
35,500
33,600
32,900
Personal GICs (1)
57,900
57,000
57,200
Branch mutual fund balances
66,900
56,500
46,600
AUA — Self-directed brokerage
28,300
23,200
19,800
New accounts opened
(thousands) (2)
1,066
769
740
Number of:
Branches
1,146
1,117
1,104
Automated teller machines
3,946
3,847
3,906
(1)
Average amounts are calculated using methods intended to approximate the average of the daily
balances for the period.
(2)
Deposit accounts only.
BUSINESS FINANCIAL SERVICES
Business Financial Services offers a wide range of lending, leasing, deposit, investment and
transaction products and services to small and medium-sized businesses, commercial, farming and
agriculture clients across Canada. We also provide trade-related products and services to Canadian
and international clients to assist them in the conduct of their import and export operations
domestically and around the globe. Our extensive business banking network includes approximately
100 business banking centres and 2,000 business account managers, and our strong commitment to our
clients has resulted in leading market share in business loans and deposits.
Financial performance
Total
revenue increased $160 million, or 7%, over the prior year. The increase was largely
attributable to solid growth in business loans and deposits, partially offset by lower spreads on
deposits.
Average business loans grew by 7% and average business deposits increased 10%, primarily
driven by continued solid business spending and high liquidity within Canadian businesses.
Selected highlights
Table 22
(C$ millions)
2007
2006
2005
Total revenue
$
2,301
$
2,141
$
2,011
Other information (average) (1)
Business loans (2)
36,900
34,400
31,700
Business deposits (3)
53,700
48,600
42,400
(1)
Average amounts are calculated using methods intended to approximate the average of the daily
balances for the period.
(2)
Includes small business loans treated as retail and wholesale loans.
(3)
Includes GIC balances.
Royal Bank of Canada: Annual Report 2007
Management’s Discussion and Analysis 59
Cards and Payment Solutions provides a wide array of convenient and customized credit cards and
related payment products and solutions. In addition, this business line includes our 50% interest
in Moneris, the merchant card processing joint venture with the Bank of Montreal.
We have over 5
million credit card accounts and have an approximately 20% market share of Canada’s credit card
purchase volume.
Financial performance
Total revenue increased $360 million, or 23%, compared to the prior year. The increase largely
reflected a $326 million ($269 million after-tax) gain related to the Visa Inc. restructuring.
Continued solid growth in credit card balances and transaction volumes also contributed to the
increase. These factors were partially offset by the receipt of a fee related to the termination of
an agreement in the prior year, as well as higher credit card customer loyalty reward program costs
this year.
Selected highlights
Table 23
(C$ millions)
2007
2006
2005
Total revenue
$
1,946
$
1,586
$
1,495
Other information
Average credit card balances (1)
11,200
9,900
8,800
Net purchase volumes
47,200
41,500
36,100
(1)
Average amounts are calculated using methods intended to approximate the average of the
daily balances for the period.
GLOBAL INSURANCE
Global Insurance offers a wide range of life, creditor, health, travel, home and auto insurance
products and services to individual and business clients in Canada and the U.S., as well as
reinsurance for clients around the world. These products and services are offered through a wide
variety of distribution channels, including telephone, independent brokers, travel agents, career
sales force, Internet and retail insurance offices.
We are the largest Canadian bank-owned insurer, with products distributed through more than
17,000 independent brokers and more than 650 career sales representatives in North America. Our
Canadian insurance business holds lead positions in creditor, travel and individual living benefits
insurance products, and has a significant presence in life, home and auto insurance. We are a
preferred provider of protection, asset accumulation and retirement solutions in the U.S.
Financial performance
Global Insurance net income increased $140 million, or 46%, compared to the prior year. The
increase was primarily related to the property catastrophe reinsurance business, reflecting the hurricane-related charges in the prior year, and a
favourable adjustment related to the reallocation of certain foreign investment capital this year,
which was partially offset by lower income from this business as we
exited this business completely this year. A higher level of favourable net actuarial
liability adjustments and solid growth in our European life reinsurance business also contributed
to the increase.
Total revenue decreased $156 million, or 5%, from a year ago. Excluding the impact of the new
financial instruments accounting standards, total revenue increased $4 million from the prior year.
The increase was largely attributable to growth in our European life reinsurance and Canadian
businesses, and a favourable adjustment related to the reallocation of certain foreign investment
capital this year. These factors were largely offset by lower U.S. annuity sales mainly due to
lower long-term interest rates and lower revenue from our property catastrophe reinsurance
operations, which we exited completely this year. For a reconciliation of Global Insurance revenue excluding the impact of the new
financial instruments accounting standards, refer to the Key performance and non-GAAP measures
section.
Gross insurance premiums and deposits were up $54 million, or 2%, primarily reflecting new
sales growth and stronger client retention, partially offset by a decline in U.S. annuity sales.
Non-interest expense was up $20 million, or 4%, from a year ago, primarily reflecting higher
project-related spending and other costs in support of business growth.
Insurance policyholder benefits, claims and acquisition expense (PBCAE) decreased $336
million, or 13%, from the prior year. Excluding the impact of the new financial instruments
accounting standards and the prior year hurricane-related charges, PBCAE decreased $121 million, or
5%, over last year. The decrease was largely attributable to the impact of lower U.S. annuity sales
and a higher level of favourable net actuarial liability adjustments this year, which included
cumulative valuation adjustments of $92 million relating to prior periods. These factors were
partially offset by increased costs commensurate with growth in our European life reinsurance and
Canadian businesses. For a reconciliation of PBCAE excluding the
Selected highlights
Table 24
(C$ millions)
2007
2006
2005
Total revenue
$
3,192
$
3,348
$
3,311
Non-interest expense
537
517
501
Insurance policyholder benefits,
claims and acquisition expense
2,173
2,509
2,625
Net income
442
302
155
Other information
Gross insurance premiums
and deposits
3,460
3,406
3,288
Insurance claims and policy
benefit liabilities
7,283
7,337
7,117
Royal Bank of Canada: Annual Report 2007
60 Management’s Discussion and Analysis
impact of the new financial instruments accounting standards, refer to the Key performance and
non-GAAP measures section.
Insurance claims and policy benefit liabilities decreased $54 million, or 1%, over the prior
year. The decrease primarily reflected the impact of a stronger Canadian dollar on the translated
value of our U.S. dollar-denominated liabilities, lower property
catastrophe reinsurance liabilities, net payments of claims related to hurricanes, and a net decrease in life
and health insurance liabilities reflecting changes to actuarial assumptions and model enhancements.
These factors were largely offset by increased costs commensurate with business growth and the
impact of the new financial instruments accounting standards.
WEALTH MANAGEMENT
Wealth Management comprises businesses that directly serve the growing wealth management
needs of affluent and high net worth clients in Canada, the U.S. and outside North America, and
businesses that provide asset management and trust products through RBC and external partners. This
segment comprises Canadian Wealth Management, U.S. & International Wealth Management and Global
Asset Management.
Highlights
•
Wealth Management was created in February 2007 to focus on extending
our leadership position in Canada and aggressively growing in the
U.S. and international markets.
•
The fastest growing segment in Canadian wealth management continues
to be high net worth clients (households with more than $1 million
in investable assets).
•
Our Canadian full-service brokerage business was the first in the
Canadian industry to surpass $150 billion in client assets under
administration.
•
We led the Canadian mutual fund industry in net sales of long-term
funds for the 16th consecutive calendar quarter.
•
We continued to grow our U.S. full-service brokerage business
through the acquisition of J.B. Hanauer & Co. (J.B. Hanauer).
•
We established international wealth management offices in several
cities, including Mexico City, Beijing and Santiago.
Economic and market review
In 2007, economic growth was solid, underpinned by a relatively favourable interest rate
environment, strong employment levels and higher wages, and a solid yet moderating housing market,
which contributed to increased demand for wealth management products. The generally favourable
capital market conditions during the year continued to support the growth of our wealth management
business. Economic growth weakened moderately in the latter part of the year mainly attributable to
slowing U.S. demand, and a tightening of credit conditions as a result of the U.S. subprime
mortgage market concerns.
Wealth Management financial highlights
Table 25
(C$ millions, except number of and percentage amounts)
2007
2006
2005
Net interest income
$
427
$
397
$
374
Non-interest income
Fee-based revenue
2,109
1,745
1,458
Transactional and other revenue
1,456
1,345
1,319
Total revenue
$
3,992
$
3,487
$
3,151
Non-interest expense
2,902
2,613
2,440
Provision for credit losses (PCL)
1
1
2
Net income before income taxes and non-controlling interest in subsidiaries
$
1,089
$
872
$
708
Net income
$
762
$
604
$
502
Key ratios
Return on equity (1)
32.4
%
27.8
%
24.5
%
Return on risk capital
65.1
%
59.3
%
54.8
%
Pre-tax margin
27.3
%
25.0
%
22.5
%
Selected average balance sheet information (2)
Total assets
$
16,600
$
15,100
$
13,200
Loans and acceptances
4,600
4,400
4,100
Deposits
24,900
22,100
20,700
Attributed capital (1)
2,300
2,150
2,050
Risk capital (1)
1,150
1,050
900
Other information
Revenue per advisor (000s) (3)
$
784
$
694
$
687
Assets under administration
488,500
476,500
380,700
Assets under management
161,200
142,800
118,500
Number of employees (full-time equivalent)
10,382
9,667
8,791
Number of advisors (3)
3,118
3,001
2,934
For the year ended
Impact of US$ translation on selected items
2007 vs. 2006
Reduced total revenue
$
61
Reduced non-interest expense
49
Reduced net income
9
Percentage change in average US$ equivalent of C$1.00 (4)
4%
(1)
Segment Return on equity, Average risk capital and Return on risk capital are key performance
measures. Average attributed capital and Return on equity are calculated using methods
intended to approximate the average of the daily balances for the period. For further
discussion, refer to the Key performance and non-GAAP measures section.
(2)
Average amounts are calculated using methods intended to approximate the average of the daily balances for the period.
(3)
Includes investment advisors and financial consultants of our Canadian and U.S. full-service brokerage businesses.
(4)
Average amounts are calculated using month-end spot rates for the year.
Royal Bank of Canada: Annual Report 2007 Management’s Discussion and Analysis 61
Net income for the year of $762 million increased $158 million, or 26%, from a year ago. The
increase was largely due to strong earnings growth across all our business lines reflecting the
ongoing successful execution of our growth initiatives and generally favourable market conditions.
We recorded a $35 million ($28 million after-tax) foreign exchange translation gain on certain
deposits in the current year related to the implementation of the new financial instruments
accounting standards.
Total revenue increased $505 million, or 14%, over the prior year, largely due to strong
growth in fee-based client assets across all business lines, reflecting new sales, capital
appreciation and the recruitment and retention of experienced advisors. A foreign exchange
translation gain on certain deposits, the inclusion of our J.B. Hanauer acquisition, solid loan and
deposit growth in our international wealth management business, and higher transactional volumes in
our brokerage businesses reflecting generally favourable market conditions throughout the early part of the
year also contributed to the increase. These factors were partially offset by the negative impact
of the stronger Canadian dollar on the translated value of U.S. dollar-denominated revenue.
Non-interest expense was up $289 million, or 11%, mainly as a result of higher variable
compensation commensurate with higher commission-based revenue, higher staffing levels and other
costs in support of business growth, including our acquisition of J.B. Hanauer. These factors were
partially offset by the favourable impact of the stronger Canadian dollar on the translated value
of U.S. dollar-denominated expenses.
2006 vs. 2005
Net income increased $102 million, or 20%, compared to 2005. The increase primarily reflected strong
earnings growth across all our business lines and generally favourable market conditions. This
increase was partially offset by higher variable compensation due to higher commission-based
revenue, higher staffing costs and increased costs in support of business growth, including our
acquisition of Abacus Financial Services Group Limited.
Total revenue increased $336 million, or 11%, compared to 2005, largely due to strong growth
in fee-based client assets reflecting new sales and capital appreciation, and the inclusion of our
Abacus acquisition. These factors were partially offset by lower client transaction volumes in our
brokerage businesses.
Non-interest expense increased $173 million, or 7%, compared to 2005. The increase was
primarily due to higher variable compensation commensurate with higher commission-based revenue,
the inclusion of our Abacus acquisition and higher staffing levels.
2008 Outlook and priorities
The Canadian economic and business environment is expected to weaken slightly although business
growth should continue to be supported by generally favourable capital market conditions. In the
U.S., we anticipate that financial market volatility will persist into early 2008, but economic
growth will reaccelerate in the latter part of 2008. Growth in other global economies is expected
to ease moderately in 2008. This economic environment and the successful execution of our strategic
priorities are anticipated to fuel our growth.
Key strategic priorities for 2008
•
Continue extending our lead in the Canadian wealth and
asset management markets.
•
Pursue strong organic and acquisition growth in our U.S.
wealth management businesses that serve individual
clients and advisors.
•
Continue expanding our high net worth international
wealth management business in select markets as well as
through bolt-on acquisitions to complement our existing
operations.
•
Focus on expanding our asset management business
globally, initially through acquisitions with a focus on
U.S. opportunities.
•
Work to continue attracting and retaining experienced
advisors, private bankers and other client-facing
professionals across all our businesses.
BUSINESS LINE REVIEW
Canadian Wealth Management
Canadian Wealth Management includes the market leader in full-service brokerage in Canada,
with over 1,300 investment advisors, providing advisor-based comprehensive financial solutions.
Additionally, we provide discretionary investment management and trust services to high net worth
clients, offering a relationship approach for clients in need of sophisticated financial solutions.
In these businesses, there are more than 28 investment counsellors and 125 trust professionals in
locations across the country.
Financial performance
Revenue increased $170 million, or 13%, over the prior year, mostly due to strong growth in
fee-based client assets reflecting higher net sales, capital appreciation and the recruitment and retention
of experienced advisors. Higher transactional volumes in our brokerage business reflecting generally
favourable market conditions also contributed to the increase.
Selected highlights
Table 26
(C$ millions)
2007
2006
2005
Total revenue
$
1,460
$
1,290
$
1,164
Other information
Assets under administration
183,000
168,600
146,400
Assets under management
22,200
17,500
12,700
Total assets under fee-based programs
83,300
70,200
56,500
Royal Bank of Canada: Annual Report 2007 62 Management’s Discussion and Analysis
U.S. & International Wealth Management consists of our retail brokerage business, which is
one of the largest full-service firms in the U.S. with over 1,770 financial consultants. We also have
a clearing and execution services business that serves small to mid-sized independent
broker-dealers and institutions. Internationally, we provide customized banking, credit, investment
and trust solutions to high net worth private clients through 2,300 employees across a network of
34 offices located in 20 countries around the world.
Financial performance
Revenue increased $256 million, or 15%, over the prior year. In U.S. dollars, revenue increased
$293 million, or 19%, largely as a result of solid growth in fee-based client assets, higher
transaction volumes in our U.S. brokerage business reflecting generally favourable market
conditions throughout the early part of the year, and a foreign exchange translation gain on certain deposits. The inclusion of our J.B.
Hanauer acquisition and solid loan and deposit growth in our international wealth management
business also contributed to the increase.
Selected highlights
Table 27
(C$ millions)
2007
2006
2005
Total revenue
$
1,988
$
1,732
$
1,580
Other information
Total loans, guarantees and
letters of credit (1), (2)
5,500
4,500
3,900
Total deposits (1), (2)
17,900
15,100
13,900
Assets under administration
305,500
307,900
234,300
Assets under management
20,200
19,700
15,600
Total assets under fee-based
programs (3)
26,600
26,400
20,700
Other information (US$ millions)
Total revenue
1,826
1,533
1,305
(1)
Represents amounts related to our international wealth management businesses.
(2)
Represents an average amount, which is calculated using methods intended to approximate
the average of the daily balances for the period.
(3)
Represents amounts related to our U.S. wealth management businesses.
Global Asset Management
Global Asset Management is responsible for our proprietary asset management business in Canada and
the U.S. In Canada, we provide a broad range of investment management services through mutual
funds, pooled funds and separately managed portfolios. We distribute our investment solutions
through a broad network of our bank branches, our discount and full-service brokers, independent
advisors and direct-to-consumer. We are the largest single fund company and one of the largest
money managers in Canada. In the U.S., we provide investment services to both retail and
institutional clients through mutual funds, fee-based accounts and separately managed portfolios.
Financial performance
Revenue increased $79 million, or 17%, over the prior year, mainly reflecting strong growth in
Canadian assets under management due to solid net long-term and money market mutual fund sales and
capital appreciation.
Selected highlights
Table 28
(C$ millions)
2007
2006
2005
Total revenue
$
544
$
465
$
407
Other information
Canadian net long-term
mutual fund sales
6,200
5,400
5,600
Assets under management
118,800
105,600
90,200
Royal Bank of Canada: Annual Report 2007 Management’s Discussion and Analysis 63
U.S. & International Banking comprises our banking businesses outside Canada, including our banking
operations in the U.S. and Caribbean. In addition, this segment includes our 50% ownership in RBC
Dexia IS.
All of our businesses leverage the global resources of RBC, while drawing upon the knowledge
and expertise of our local professionals to deliver customized solutions to our clients. We
differentiate ourselves in each of our highly competitive marketplaces by tailoring solutions to
meet our clients’ specific needs and building strong, long-lasting relationships by consistently
delivering high-quality service.
Highlights
•
We continued to expand our banking footprint in key growth areas in the
U.S. Southeast through targeted acquisitions and de novo branch openings. We
acquired 39 AmSouth Bank branches (AmSouth branches) in Alabama and added 17
branches in Georgia when we acquired Flag Financial Corporation (Flag).
•
We realized a 12% (17% in Euros) growth in assets under administration
with RBC Dexia IS, underpinned by both new and existing client growth.
•
We added a real estate lending team to our Caribbean operations, giving
us the expertise to better serve clients across the region. In addition, we
formed a small business unit to serve this growing client segment.
Economic and market review
The solid U.S. economic growth in the middle of the year, primarily supported by continued
non-residential investment, strong export growth and consumer spending, slowed in the latter part
of the year. The weakening economic conditions largely reflected the ongoing housing market
correction, a tightening of credit conditions and increased funding costs arising from the U.S.
subprime mortgage market concerns. This resulted in a general weakening in credit quality of
residential real estate-related loans. Internationally, economic conditions in the Caribbean
remained strong, although strong competition in the deposits market
also tempered business growth.
Solid economic conditions in Canada and the fast-growing asset management industry in Europe
continued to support our global custody business growth.
U.S. & International Banking financial highlights
Table 29
(C$ millions, except percentage amounts)
2007
2006
2005
Net interest income
$
1,031
$
940
$
923
Non-interest income
884
688
654
Total revenue
$
1,915
$
1,628
$
1,577
Non-interest expense
1,481
1,216
1,136
Provision for credit losses (PCL)
109
25
49
Net income before income taxes and non-controlling
interest in subsidiaries
$
325
$
387
$
395
Net income
$
242
$
261
$
256
Key ratios
Return on equity (1)
6.9
%
10.6
%
10.8
%
Return on risk capital (1)
11.7
%
16.1
%
16.4
%
Selected average balance sheet and other information (2)
Total assets
$
39,700
$
32,600
$
25,900
Loans and acceptances
22,300
18,500
17,200
Deposits
34,200
28,700
21,200
Attributed capital (1)
3,350
2,400
2,350
Risk capital (1)
1,950
1,600
1,550
Other information
Assets under administration — RBC
—
—
1,361,100
Assets under administration — RBC Dexia IS (3)
2,713,100
2,421,100
—
Number of employees (full-time equivalent)
6,001
5,034
6,880
Credit information
Gross impaired loans as a percentage of average net loans and acceptances
1.91
%
1.01
%
.94
%
PCL as a percentage of average net loans and acceptances
.49
%
.14
%
.28
%
For the year ended
Impact of US$ and Euro translation on selected items
2007 vs. 2006
Reduced total revenue
$
8
Reduced non-interest expense
6
Increased net income
4
Percentage change in average US$ equivalent of C$1.00 (4)
4
%
Percentage change in average Euro equivalent of C$1.00 (4)
(5
)%
(1)
Segment Return on equity, Average risk capital and Return on risk capital are key performance
measures. Average attributed capital and Return on equity are calculated using methods
intended to approximate the average of the daily balances for the period. For further
discussion, refer to the Key performance and non-GAAP measures section.
(2)
Average amounts are calculated using methods intended to approximate the average of the daily balances for the period.
(3)
AUA — RBC Dexia IS represents the total AUA of the joint venture as at September 30, 2007.
We have revised the 2006 amount to reflect the amount reported by RBC Dexia IS, as we had
previously disclosed only the assets under custody amount related to our joint venture.
(4)
Average amounts are calculated using month-end spot rates for the year.
Royal Bank of Canada: Annual Report 2007 64 Management’s Discussion and Analysis
Net income decreased $19 million, or 7%, from the prior year. The decrease was largely attributable
to increased provision for credit losses, primarily reflecting higher impaired loans in our U.S.
residential builder finance business. This was partially offset by strong business growth in
RBC Dexia IS, as well as higher loan and deposit growth in the U.S. reflecting the inclusion of our
acquisitions of Flag and the AmSouth branches, de novo branch openings and business expansion. Our
results also reflected higher costs in support of business growth and a loss on the restructuring of
our U.S. banking investment portfolio this year.
Total revenue increased $287 million, or 18%, from the prior year. The increase was primarily
attributable to RBC Dexia IS, reflecting strong market activity, an additional month of results and
business growth. Banking revenue was also up largely due to loan and deposit growth, mainly
reflecting the inclusion of Flag and the AmSouth branches, despite the negative impact of a stronger
Canadian dollar on the translated value of U.S. dollar-denominated revenue. These factors were
partially offset by a loss on the restructuring of our U.S. banking investment portfolio this year.
Non-interest expense was up $265 million, or 22%, over the prior year, largely reflecting
higher costs in support of business growth. The increase primarily reflected higher processing and
staff costs at RBC Dexia IS commensurate with business growth, the inclusion of our acquisitions of
Flag and the AmSouth branches and the related integration costs, and U.S. de novo branch openings.
Higher costs associated with an additional month of results relating to RBC Dexia IS, as well as an
increase in sales and service personnel in our banking branch network also contributed to the
increase.
Provision for credit losses was up $84 million, largely due to higher impaired loans in our
U.S. residential builder finance business, reflecting the downturn in the U.S. housing market in
the latter part of the year. As at October 31, 2007, we had $2.8 billion in our U.S. residential builder finance loans outstanding.
2006 vs. 2005
Net income increased $5 million, or 2%, from 2005, largely reflecting solid growth and improved
credit quality in Banking, partially offset by transaction expenses related to the transfer of
Institutional & Investor Services to RBC Dexia IS.
Total revenue increased $51 million, or 3%, from 2005, primarily reflecting strong revenue
growth in RBC Dexia IS due to increased business volume. The increase was partially offset by
lower Banking revenue due to the negative impact of a stronger Canadian dollar on the translated
value of U.S. dollar-denominated revenue. In U.S. dollars, Banking revenue increased $58 million,
or 7%, reflecting solid loan and deposit growth and higher fee-based activities.
Non-interest expense was up $80 million, or 7%, from 2005, primarily reflecting transaction
expenses related to the transfer of IIS to RBC Dexia IS, as well as higher project-related spending
and other costs in support of business growth.
Provision for credit losses decreased $24 million, or 49%, compared to 2005, primarily
reflecting strong credit quality in our U.S. banking loan portfolio in 2006.
2008 Outlook and priorities
We continue to see significant opportunities in the U.S. and Caribbean to expand our Banking
business, through a combination of organic growth and strategic acquisitions. We anticipate that
the current financial market volatility in the U.S. will persist into early 2008, as investors and
lenders will remain cautious and risk averse amid the continued correction in the U.S. housing
market. The anticipated improved U.S. economic conditions in the latter part of 2008, primarily
underpinned by rising business investment, strong export growth and continued consumer spending
against a backdrop of the abatement of current financial market volatility and the housing market
correction, should support business and revenue growth. The projected solid economic growth in
Canada and the Eurozone, as well as the increasing trend of outsourcing by fund managers in Canada,
the Eurozone and Asia should continue to support RBC Dexia IS business growth.
Key strategic priorities for 2008
•
Continue implementing our long-term strategy to become
the pre-eminent bank for businesses, business owners and
professionals in the U.S. Southeast.
•
Efficiently integrate the pending acquisition of Alabama
National BanCorporation for our U.S. banking operations,
while retaining and growing our client base through
continuous enhancement of our products and services and
distribution network.
•
Build on our strong position in the Caribbean to create
the leading bank in the region through the efficient
integration of RBTT Financial Group, which we recently announced our
intention to acquire, subject to closing conditions.
•
Pursue growth strategies with RBC Dexia IS that focus on
strengthening the global client franchise, broadening
its suite of products through innovation and expanding
its presence in high-growth markets.
Royal Bank of Canada: Annual Report 2007 Management’s Discussion and Analysis 65
Banking consists of our banking operations in the U.S. and Caribbean. These businesses offer a
broad range of banking products and services to personal and business clients in their respective
markets, including residential construction finance services. Our U.S. banking business ranks 5th
in deposit market share in North Carolina and among the top 15 in its U.S. Southeast banking
footprint. It has a network of 350 branches and 395 ATMs. Caribbean banking ranks in the top three
in deposit market share in most of its markets and has 44 branches and 78 ATMs.
Financial performance
Total revenue increased $86 million, or 8%, compared to the prior year, despite the negative impact
of a stronger Canadian dollar on the translated value of U.S. dollar-denominated revenue. In U.S.
dollars, Banking revenue increased $114 million, or 12%, primarily driven by solid loan and deposit
growth, reflecting the inclusion of Flag and the AmSouth branches, the 10 U.S. de novo branch
openings since last year and business growth. These factors were partially offset by a loss on the
restructuring of our U.S. banking investment portfolio. Net interest margin was down 16 bps,
largely due to continued competitive pressure on deposit business, the reversal of accrued interest
related to higher impaired loans this year, and a loss on the early redemption of trust preferred
notes due to the impact of changes in our portfolio mix.
In U.S.
dollars, average loans and
acceptances, and deposits were up $3 billion (18%) and $2 billion (11%), respectively, from the
prior year. The increase was primarily attributable to growth in loans and acceptances, and
deposits in our U.S. banking operations of 18% and 12%, respectively, reflecting our acquisitions
of Flag and the AmSouth branches, de novo branch openings and business growth. Growth in loans and
acceptances, and deposits in our Caribbean banking operations of 14% and 8%, respectively,
reflecting our continued focus on enhancing sales management and client satisfaction, also
contributed to the increase.
Selected highlights
Table 30
2007
2006
2005
Total revenue (C$ millions)
$
1,156
$
1,070
$
1,077
Other information (US$ millions)
Total revenue
$
1,059
$
945
$
887
Net interest margin (1)
3.56
%
3.73
%
3.70
%
Average loans and
acceptances (2), (3)
$
17,800
$
15,100
$
14,200
Average deposits (2), (3)
17,700
15,900
15,500
Number of:
Branches
394
325
315
Automated teller machines
473
385
371
(1)
Net interest margin (NIM) is calculated as Net interest income divided by Average total
earning assets. Average total earning assets are calculated using methods intended to
approximate the average of the daily balances for the period.
(2)
Average amounts are calculated using methods intended to approximate the average of the
daily balances for the period.
(3)
Average loans and acceptances and Average deposits have been adjusted for 2005 for netting
of a large Caribbean government account effective the fourth quarter of 2005, which reduced
loan and deposit balances by a similar amount.
RBC Dexia Investor Services
Our joint venture, RBC Dexia IS, offers an integrated suite of institutional investor
products and services, including global custody, fund and pension administration, securities
lending, shareholder services, analytics and other related services, to institutional investors
worldwide. RBC Dexia IS was created on January 2, 2006, when we combined our Institutional &
Investor Services (IIS) business with Luxembourg-based Dexia Funds Services in return for a 50%
joint venture interest in RBC Dexia IS.
Financial performance
Total revenue was up $201 million, or 36%, compared to the prior year. The increase primarily
reflected growth in our custodian and securities lending business on strong market activity, as
well as organic growth from existing clients and the acquisition of new clients. An additional
month of results reported in the year also contributed to the increase.
Assets under administration were up 12% from a year ago. The increase was largely attributable
to the acquisition of new clients, largely driven by an increase in sales as a result of our
broadened product and service offerings, organic growth from existing customers and market
appreciation.
Selected highlights
Table 31
(C$ millions)
2007
2006
2005
Total revenue (1)
$
759
$
558
$
500
Other information
Assets under administration
RBC (2)
—
—
1,361,100
RBC Dexia IS (3)
2,713,100
2,421,100
—
(1)
Given the similarities between the IIS and RBC Dexia IS businesses, we have disclosed the
revenue from our prior IIS business and our 50% proportionate ownership of RBC Dexia IS on the
same line for comparative purposes. Revenue presented for 2006 represents two months of
revenue from our IIS business earned between November 1, 2005, and the creation of RBC Dexia
IS on January 2, 2006. The current period revenue also includes our proportionate share of RBC
Dexia IS for the twelve months ended September 30, 2007, as RBC Dexia IS reports on a one
month lag.
(2)
AUA — RBC represents total Assets under administration (AUA) of our IIS business. IIS AUA
of $1,400 billion was contributed to RBC Dexia IS in exchange for our 50% ownership
interest.
(3)
AUA — RBC Dexia IS represents the total AUA of the joint venture as at September 30, 2007.
We have revised the 2006 amount to reflect the amount reported by RBC Dexia IS, as we had
previously disclosed only the assets under custody amount related to our joint venture.
Royal Bank of Canada: Annual Report 2007
66 Management’s Discussion and Analysis
Capital Markets comprises our global wholesale banking business, which provides a wide
range of corporate and investment banking, sales and trading, research and related products and
services to corporations, public sector and institutional clients in North America and specialized
products and services in select global markets. This segment consists of two main businesses,
Global Markets and Global Investment Banking and Equity Markets. All other businesses are grouped
under Other.
We have an established reputation as a premier Canadian investment bank with top-tier market
share in virtually all lines of wholesale business in Canada. We offer a full suite of products and
service capabilities and have long-standing and deep relationships with our clients. We have a
select but diversified set of global capabilities which includes fixed income, equity, foreign
exchange, structured products, global infrastructure finance, and energy and mining.
We remain committed to our businesses and will maintain our focus on being the undisputed
leader in Canada, a top-tier leader in the U.S. mid-market, a global structurer and trader, and a
leading global fixed income bank.
Highlights
•
We completed three acquisitions to access new clients and build on
our capabilities: Carlin Financial Group, a U.S. broker-dealer known
for its proprietary trade execution platform; Daniels & Associates,
L.P., a U.S. merger and acquisition advisory firm; and Seasongood &
Mayer, LLC, a U.S. public finance firm and municipal debt
underwriter.
•
In 2007, we led or jointly led many significant debt and equity new
issuance transactions totalling $184 billion.
•
We were involved in the top five merger and acquisitions
transactions with Canadian involvement through the first three
calendar quarters of 2007.
•
We were named Dealmaker of the Year in Canada four of the last five years (Financial Post) and the Best Investment Bank in
Canada (Financial Post and Global Finance Magazine).
Capital Markets financial highlights
Table 32
(C$ millions, except number of and percentage amounts)
2007
2006
2005
Net interest income (1)
$
453
$
131
$
557
Non-interest income
3,936
4,005
3,005
Total revenue (1)
$
4,389
$
4,136
$
3,562
Non-interest expense
2,769
2,603
2,890
Provision for (recovery of) credit losses (PCL)
(22
)
(115
)
(91
)
Net income before income taxes and non-controlling interest in subsidiaries (1)
$
1,642
$
1,649
$
762
Net income
$
1,292
$
1,355
$
686
Key ratios
Return on equity (2)
26.6
%
31.5
%
17.5
%
Return on risk capital (2)
32.5
%
38.7
%
22.4
%
Selected average balance sheet information (3)
Total assets
$
311,200
$
260,600
$
229,100
Trading securities
152,900
132,300
109,600
Loans and acceptances
29,000
22,100
17,600
Deposits
125,700
108,100
96,500
Attributed capital (2)
4,800
4,250
3,850
Risk capital (2)
3,900
3,450
3,050
Other information
Number of employees (full-time equivalent)
3,364
2,936
2,762
Credit information
Gross impaired loans as a percentage of average net loans and acceptances
.06
%
.28
%
.67
%
Specific PCL as a percentage of average net loans and acceptances
(.08
)%
(.52
)%
(.52
)%
For the year ended
Impact of US$ and British pound translation on selected items (1)
2007 vs. 2006
Reduced total revenue (1)
$
70
Reduced non-interest expense
15
Reduced net income
30
Percentage change in average US$ equivalent of C$1.00 (4)
4
%
Percentage change in average British pound equivalent of C$1.00 (4)
(5
)%
(1)
Taxable equivalent basis. For further discussion, refer to the How we measure and report our
business segments section.
(2)
Segment Return on equity, Average risk capital and Return on risk capital are key
performance measures. Average attributed capital and Return on equity are calculated using
methods intended to approximate the average of the daily balances for the period. For
further discussion, refer to the Key performance and non-GAAP measures section.
(3)
Average amounts are calculated using methods intended to approximate the average of the daily
balances for the period.
(4)
Average amounts are calculated using month-end spot rates for the year.
(1)
Taxable equivalent basis. For further discussion, refer to the How we measure and
report our business segments section.
Royal Bank of Canada: Annual Report 2007
Management’s Discussion and Analysis 67
Capital markets were generally favourable for the first part of 2007; however, a sudden and deep
deterioration in the U.S. subprime residential mortgage-backed securities market in the latter part
of 2007 had negative effects on the broader credit markets. This was characterized by significant
credit spread widening, increased volatility in global equities, the credit rating agency downgrades of a broad
group of collateralized debt obligations of asset-backed securities (CDOs of ABS) and U.S. RMBS instruments and a general lack of liquidity across a broad range
of products including securities with strong credit ratings. The severe disruption in financial
markets contributed to substantial writedowns and negatively impacted the effectiveness of hedging
strategies for certain credit related products. Global central banks continued to provide liquidity
to financial markets in an effort to minimize the impact of the market dislocation on the broader
economy, including a 75 bps aggressive reduction in its overnight borrowing rate by the U.S.
Federal Reserve during the fourth quarter of 2007. Lower levels of liquidity coupled with increased
financial market volatility contributed to lower levels of origination activity compared to 2006.
M&A activity remained strong for most of the year. The stronger Canadian dollar negatively impacted
the translated value of our U.S. dollar- denominated earnings.
Financial performance
2007 vs. 2006
Net income decreased $63 million, or 5%, compared to a year ago largely due to writedowns recorded
in the current year totalling $357 million on the valuation of U.S. subprime RMBS and
CDOs of ABS in our Structured Credit business. The writedowns reflected the deterioration in the
credit markets in the latter part of 2007 as a result of concerns over the U.S. subprime market, a general
lack of liquidity and the recent credit rating agency downgrades of a broad group of CDOs of ABS and
U.S. RMBS instruments. The negative impact of the stronger Canadian dollar on the translated value
of U.S. dollar-denominated earnings also contributed to the decrease. These factors were partially
offset by broad-based revenue growth in many other businesses. The writedowns of $357 million were
offset by a $119 million compensation adjustment and $78 million income tax adjustment for a net
impact of $160 million.
Total revenue increased $253 million, or 6%. The increase was primarily due to increased
equity derivatives and foreign exchange trading revenue, strong equity origination activity across
all geographies and the inclusion of our recent acquisitions. Higher M&A activity, mainly in the
U.S. gains associated with credit derivative contracts used to economically hedge our core lending
portfolio reflecting the widening of credit spreads, and higher distributions on private equity
investments also contributed to the increase. These factors were partially offset by lower trading
revenue in our fixed income businesses reflecting the writedowns on the valuation of U.S. subprime RMBS and CDOs of ABS, the negative impact of the stronger Canadian dollar on the translated value of U.S.
dollar-denominated revenue and lower U.S. debt origination results due in part to the tightening of
credit markets in the latter part of 2007.
Non-interest expense increased $166 million, or 6%, primarily reflecting increased costs in
support of business growth, including higher staffing levels and the inclusion of our recent
acquisitions. These factors were partially offset by lower variable compensation commensurate with
weaker results and lower professional fees.
Recovery of credit losses of $22 million in the current year compares to a recovery of credit
losses of $115 million in the prior year, which included a $50 million reversal of the general
allowance.
Average assets were up $51 billion, or 19%, mainly due to increased trading securities
primarily resulting from growth in certain equity trading strategies and in our fixed income
trading businesses. Loans and acceptances increased $7 billion, or 31%, mainly related to
strong investment banking activity and growth in our Infrastructure Finance business. Deposits
increased $18 billion, or 16%, primarily due to increased funding requirements of our trading
businesses. Credit quality remained strong as gross impaired loans decreased $43 million, or 72%,
from a year ago.
2006 vs. 2005
Net income increased $669 million, or 98%, compared to 2005 primarily due to the prior year Enron
litigation-related provision of $591 million ($326 million after-tax). Also contributing to the
increase were record trading results, a lower effective income tax rate and near record M&A fees.
These factors were partly offset by higher variable compensation on improved business performance
and the negative impact of a stronger Canadian dollar on the translated value of our U.S. dollar-
and British pound-denominated earnings.
Total revenue increased $574 million, or 16%. The increase was primarily due to record trading
results on improved market conditions and growth in certain equity trading strategies and stronger
M&A activity. Higher distributions and gains from private equity investments, increased brokerage
commissions and increased credit fees related to investment banking activity also contributed to
the increase. These factors were partially offset by a decline in equity origination in Canada
mainly reflecting uncertainty in equity markets outside the resource sector. Debt origination fees
were also down, mainly in the U.S., due to the rising interest rate environment and further
weakening of the U.S. dollar.
Non-interest expense decreased $287 million, or 10%, largely reflecting the Enron
litigation-related provision recorded in 2005 and the favourable reduction in the translated value
of U.S. dollar- and British pound-denominated expenses due to the stronger Canadian dollar. Higher
variable compensation on stronger business performance and higher spending in support of business
growth initiatives partly offset the decrease.
Recovery of credit losses of $115 million in 2006, including a $50 million reversal of the
general allowance, compared to a recovery of credit losses of $91 million in 2005.
2008 Outlook and priorities
Credit market and liquidity concerns should abate as capital markets stabilize globally and
gradually return to more normal levels of activity. The expected gradual improvement in market
conditions should result in the recovery of underperforming businesses. In Canada, we will continue
to build on our leadership position, while in the U.S. we remain focused on leveraging the
strengths of recent acquisitions continuing to build our mid-market franchise and expanding into
new sectors. Internationally, we will strategically expand our global capabilities, including
strengthening our Infrastructure Finance business and expanding the distribution of structured and
fixed income products into Asian markets. Our deal pipeline should remain fairly healthy and is
expected to continue to grow; however, conversion remains a concern.
Key strategic priorities for 2008
•
Maintain our leadership position in Canada and deepen
our penetration in the Canadian mid-market segment.
•
Continue to grow our Municipal Products business with
the recently acquired platform of Seasongood & Mayer,
expand our banking activities geographically and develop
new product segments in the U.S.
•
Continue to expand the distribution of structured and
fixed income products into Asian markets.
•
Continue to expand our infrastructure and project
finance product offering from U.K. to other
international and U.S. markets.
•
Continue to build our global energy capabilities, an
area of strength for us.
Royal
Bank of Canada: Annual Report 2007
68 Management’s Discussion and Analysis
Global Markets is our centre for origination, trading and distribution of predominantly
investment grade fixed income, foreign exchange and derivative products. It also conducts our
proprietary trading operations, alternative asset and private equity businesses.
Financial performance
Global Markets revenue decreased $124 million, or 5%, from a year ago. Trading-related revenue was
down $94 million, or 4%, primarily due to lower trading revenue in certain fixed income business as a
result of writedowns totalling $357 million on the valuation of U.S. subprime RMBS and CDOs of ABS
in our Structured Credit business. This was partially offset by higher equity derivatives and
foreign exchange trading revenue due to business expansion and increased market volatility. Other
revenue was down $30 million from a year ago largely due to lower private equity investment gains.
We led or jointly led 1,005 debt issues, up from 615 deals a year ago, with a total value of
approximately $164 billion, and in Municipal Finance, we were involved in 779 issues with a total
value of US$81 billion through October 2007.
Selected highlights
Table 33
(C$ millions)
2007
2006
2005
Total revenue (1)
$
2,455
$
2,579
$
2,256
Other information
Trading-related
2,060
2,154
1,706
Other (2)
395
425
550
(1)
Taxable equivalent basis. For further discussion, refer to the How we measure and report our
business segments section.
(2)
Other includes debt origination, municipal products, gains/losses on private equity
instruments, derivatives non-trading and securitization revenue.
Global Investment Banking and Equity Markets
Global Investment Banking and Equity Markets brings together our investment banking and equity
sales and trading capabilities to provide a complete suite of advisory and equity-related services
to clients from origination, structuring and advising to distribution, sales and trading.
Given the significant growth in our National Clients business, we transferred this business
from Other to Global Investment Banking and Equity Markets in the second quarter of 2007.
Financial performance
Global Investment Banking and Equity Markets revenue increased $293 million, or 21%, compared to
the prior year. Gross underwriting and advisory revenue was up $166 million, or 25%, largely
reflecting strong equity origination activity across all geographies and improved M&A activity
mainly in the U.S. Equity sales and trading revenue increased $92
million, or 33%, mainly due to the inclusion of our recent acquisitions, while Other revenue was up
$35 million, or 8%, primarily reflecting higher private equity distributions and increased lending
activity.
In 2007, we advised on 98 announced M&A deals with a total value of $190
billion. In 2007, we led or co-led 142 equity and equity-related new issues with a total market
value of $20 billion, up from 82 in the prior year.
Selected highlights
Table 34
(C$ millions)
2007
2006
2005
Total revenue (1)
$
1,675
$
1,382
$
1,098
Other information
Gross underwriting and
advisory fees
831
665
598
Equity sales and trading
375
283
252
Other (2)
469
434
248
(1)
Taxable equivalent basis. For further discussion, refer to the How we measure and report our
business segments section.
(2)
Other includes increases in private equity distributions, growth in revenue associated with
our core lending portfolio and syndicated finance and the gain on the exchange of our NYSE
seats for NYX shares.
Royal Bank of Canada: Annual Report 2007
Management’s Discussion and Analysis 69
Other consists of our remaining businesses including our Global Credit business, which oversees the
management of our core lending portfolios and manages our non-strategic lending portfolio. Global
Credit also includes our Global Financial Institutions business which delivers innovative and
creative solutions to global financial institutions including correspondent banking, treasury and
cash management services. Research offers economic and securities research products to
institutional clients in Canada and globally.
Financial performance
Revenue from Other was $259 million, an increase of $84 million, or 48%, over the prior year. The
increase mainly reflected gains associated with credit derivative contracts used to economically
hedge our core lending portfolio reflecting the widening of credit spreads and increased revenue in
our Global Financial Institutions business due to higher deposit balances.
CORPORATE SUPPORT
Corporate Support segment activities include our global technology and operations group, corporate
treasury, finance, human resources, risk management, internal audit and other global functions, the
costs of which are largely allocated to the business segments.
The
reported results for the Corporate Support segment mainly reflect activities that are
undertaken for the benefit of the organization, and which are not allocated to the business segments
such as enterprise funding, securitization and the net charges associated with unattributed
capital. The results also include consolidation adjustments including the elimination of the teb adjustments recorded in Capital Markets related to
the gross-up of income from Canadian taxable corporate dividends to their taxable equivalent value.
These adjustments are recorded in net interest income and offset in the provision for income taxes.
Due to the nature of activities and consolidated adjustments reported in this segment, we
believe that a year-over-year trend analysis is not relevant. The
following identifies the material
items affecting the reported results in each year.
Corporate Support financial highlights
Table 35
(C$ millions)
2007
2006
2005
Net interest income (1)
$
(732
)
$
(488
)
$
(294
)
Non-interest income
377
178
190
Total revenue (1)
$
(355
)
$
(310
)
$
(104
)
Non-interest expense
36
36
61
Recovery of credit losses
(85
)
(86
)
(47
)
Business realignment charges
—
—
39
Net loss before income taxes and non-controlling interest in subsidiaries (1)
$
(306
)
$
(260
)
$
(157
)
Net income (loss)
$
209
$
111
$
(14
)
Selected average balance sheet and other information (2)
Total assets
$
(6,500
)
$
(5,400
)
$
(4,000
)
Attributed capital (3)
2,950
3,100
2,800
Securitization
Total securitizations sold and outstanding (4)
$
17,889
$
15,836
$
11,587
New securitization activity in the year (5)
4,264
6,142
3,821
Other information
Number of employees (full-time equivalent)
19,485
18,393
17,785
(1)
Taxable equivalent basis. For further discussion, refer to the How we manage and report
our business segments section. These amounts included the elimination of the adjustment
related to the gross-up of income from Canadian corporate dividends of $332 million in 2007
recorded in Capital Markets (2006 — $213 million, 2005 — $109 million).
(2)
Average amounts are calculated using methods intended to approximate the average of the daily
balances for the period.
(3)
For further discussion, refer to the Key performance and non-GAAP measures section.
(4)
Total securitizations sold and outstanding comprises of credit card loans and residential
mortgages.
(5)
New securitization activity comprises residential mortgages and credit card loans
securitized and sold in the year. For further details, refer to Note 5 of our Consolidated
Financial Statements.
2007
Net income of $209 million for the year included income tax amounts largely related to enterprise
funding activities that were not allocated to the business segments and favourable income tax
settlements related to prior years. These factors were partially offset by the mark-to-market
losses mainly related to the recognition of the ineffectiveness of hedged items and the related
derivatives in hedge accounting relationships, a cumulative adjustment for losses resulting from
the fair valuing of certain derivatives that did not qualify for hedge accounting and higher
capital taxes that were not allocated to the business segments.
2006
Net income
of $111 million for the year mainly reflected income tax
amounts which were largely related to enterprise funding activities
and the favourable resolution of income tax audits related to prior years not allocated to the
business segments. Mark-to-market gains on derivatives related to certain economic hedges also
contributed to net income in the year. These factors were partially offset by the timing of
securitization activity and an amount accrued related to a leased space which we will not occupy
and expect to sublease at a rate lower than our contracted rate.
2005
Net loss
of $14 million largely reflected business realignment charges of $39 million, and
mark-to-market losses on derivatives relating to certain economic hedges, which were partially
offset by securitization activity and interest refunds relating to the resolution of disputed tax
items for the 1993 to 1998 tax periods.
Royal Bank of Canada: Annual Report 2007
70 Management’s Discussion and Analysis
Assets purchased under reverse repurchase agreements and securities borrowed
64,313
59,378
Loans
239,429
209,939
Other assets
103,735
69,100
Total assets
600,346
536,780
Deposits
365,205
343,523
Other liabilities
201,284
160,575
Non-controlling interest in subsidiaries
1,483
1,775
Shareholders’ equity
24,439
22,123
With the
adoption of the new financial instruments accounting standards,
certain financial
instruments are now measured at fair value that were previously reported at cost or amortized cost.
As a result, a greater portion of our Consolidated Balance Sheet is now measured at fair value,
including certain derivative instruments. For further details, refer to the Critical accounting
policies and estimates section as well as Notes 1 and 2 to our Consolidated Financial Statements.
2007 vs. 2006
Total assets were up $64 billion, or 12%, from a year ago, driven by growth across most asset
categories. The increase was largely attributable to solid loan growth, including Canadian
residential mortgages and personal and business loans, amid generally favourable domestic market
conditions. Higher balances related to derivative-related amounts,
primarily reflecting changes in
market conditions, also contributed to the increase.
Interest-bearing deposits with banks increased $1 billion, or 13%, from the prior year,
largely reflecting a shift in our portfolio mix to higher-yielding assets.
Securities were down $7 billion, or 4%, from a year ago, primarily due to a strategic
reduction in our positions taking into account recent financial market volatility, and the impact
of a stronger Canadian dollar on the translated value of U.S. dollar-denominated securities.
Assets purchased under reverse repurchase agreements and securities borrowed increased $5
billion, or 8%, from a year ago. This growth primarily reflected higher balances in support of our
equity and fixed income trading strategies.
Loans
increased $29 billion, or 14%, from a year ago, reflecting increases across all
categories. The largest growth was attributable to Canadian residential mortgages, which increased
$13 billion, or 14% (despite the offsetting effect of $13 billion of securitizations over the
past 12 months) and personal loans, largely driven by demand for home equity lending amid continued
strong Canadian housing market activities, relatively low interest rates in a historical context
and strong labour market conditions. Solid growth in our wholesale loans of $11 billion, or 19%,
mainly reflecting continued growth in corporate lending also contributed to the increase.
Other assets were up $35 billion, or 50%. The growth was mainly attributable to an increase in
derivative-related amounts primarily in foreign exchange and interest
rate contracts, reflecting
increased volatility, strong shifts in exchange rates and interest rates, as well as higher client
and trading activity. These factors were partially offset by the impact of a stronger Canadian
dollar on the translated value of U.S. dollar-denominated derivative-related assets.
Deposits increased $22 billion, or 6%, from a year ago. The growth was largely due to
increased business and government deposits mainly reflecting higher balances in support of business
activities, increased balances at RBC Dexia IS, and domestic business growth. Higher personal
deposits in part driven by the success of our recently launched high-interest online savings
account also contributed to the increase. These factors were partially offset by a reduction in
interest-bearing deposits with banks in part reflecting our lower funding requirements compared to a
year ago.
Other liabilities rose $41 billion, or 25%, from last year. The increase was mainly due to
derivative-related amounts, primarily reflecting the same factors noted above in derivative-related
assets. Increased securities sold short, mainly reflecting business growth and higher balance in
support of our fixed income trading strategies, also contributed to the increase.
Shareholders’ equity increased $2 billion, or 10%, over the prior year. The growth largely
reflected strong earnings growth, net of dividends, and a $1 billion net issuance of preferred
shares since last year.
CAPITAL MANAGEMENT
Capital management framework
We actively manage our capital to balance the desire to maintain strong capital ratios and high
ratings with the objective of providing strong returns to our shareholders. In striving to achieve
this balance, we consider the requirements of regulators, rating agencies, depositors and
shareholders, as well as our future business plans, peer comparisons and our position relative to
internal targets for capital ratios. Additional considerations include the costs and terms of
current and potential capital issuances, and projected capital requirements.
Our
capital management framework provides the policies and processes for defining, measuring,
raising and investing all forms of capital in a co-ordinated and consistent manner. We manage and
monitor our capital from several perspectives, including:
(i)
Regulatory capital: capital required for regulatory compliance
defined in accordance with the Office of the Superintendent of
Financial Institutions Canada (OSFI) criteria;
(ii)
Economic Capital: an internal assessment of the amount of equity
capital required to underpin our risks; and
(iii)
Subsidiary capital: the amount of regulatory capital invested
in subsidiaries.
This co-ordinated approach to capital management serves an important business function. Our goal is
to optimize our capital usage and structure and provide efficient support for our business segments
and clients and better returns for our shareholders, while protecting our depositors and senior
creditors.
Governance
The Board of Directors is responsible for the annual review and approval of our capital plan, in
conjunction with our operating plan. The Audit Committee is responsible for the governance of
capital management, which includes the approval of capital management policies,
Royal Bank of Canada: Annual Report 2007
Management’s Discussion and Analysis 71
the regular review of our capital position and liquidity, funding and capital management processes,
and the ongoing review of internal control over financial reporting. In addition, the OSFI meets
with our Audit Committee and the Conduct Review and Risk Policy Committee (CR&RPC) to discuss
policies and procedures regarding capital management.
The Asset & Liability Committee and the Group Executive share management oversight
responsibility for capital management and receive regular reports detailing compliance with the
established limits and guidelines. Corporate Treasury and Group Risk Management (GRM) are
responsible for the design and implementation of policies for regulatory, economic and subsidiary
capital.
Risk-adjusted assets (RAA)
Under the current Basel I framework, the calculation of RAA is determined by the OSFI-prescribed
rules relating to on-balance sheet and off-balance sheet exposures and includes an amount for the
market risk exposure associated with our trading portfolios.
During the year, RAA increased by $23.9 billion, with strong growth across most categories
including loans, mortgages, and off-balance sheet derivative instruments. However, growth in
nominal assets was partially offset by the impact of a stronger Canadian dollar on the translated
value of our foreign currency-denominated assets.
Risk-adjusted assets (1)
Table 37
Risk-adjusted balance
Weighted
Balance
average of
(C$ millions, except percentage amounts)
sheet amount
risk weights (2)
2007
2006
Balance sheet assets
Cash and deposits with banks
$
16,107
18
%
$
2,852
$
2,322
Securities
Issued or guaranteed by Canadian or other OECD (3) governments
16,858
—
52
42
Other
161,591
6
%
9,495
7,811
Residential mortgages (4)
Insured
27,994
1
%
355
363
Conventional
81,713
40
%
32,885
27,921
Other loans and acceptances (4)
Issued or guaranteed by Canadian or other OECD (3) governments
32,577
17
%
5,651
3,848
Other
171,422
69
%
118,723
107,336
Other assets
92,100
11
%
10,487
10,609
$
600,362
$
180,500
$
160,252
Credit
equivalent
amount (5)
Off-balance sheet financial instruments
Credit instruments
Guarantees and standby letters of credit
$
19,758
60
%
$
11,807
$
14,092
Documentary and commercial letters of credit
100
78
%
78
65
Securities lending (6)
36,187
3
%
962
3,022
Commitments to extend credit
21,954
85
%
18,752
16,666
Liquidity facilities
4,826
98
%
4,746
4,413
Note issuances and revolving underwriting facilities
—
—
—
4
$
82,825
$
36,345
$
38,262
Derivatives (7)
57,973
25
%
14,457
10,432
Total
off-balance sheet financial instruments
$
140,798
$
50,802
$
48,694
Total
specific and general market risk
16,333
14,763
Total risk-adjusted assets
$
247,635
$
223,709
(1)
Calculated using guidelines issued by the OSFI.
(2)
Represents the weighted average of counterparty risk weights within a particular category.
(3)
OECD stands for Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
(4)
Amounts are shown net of allowance for loan losses.
(5)
The amount of credit exposure attributable to an off-balance
sheet financial instrument, derived
from the notional value of the exposure.
(6)
In 2007, we implemented a new trading credit risk system in
our London office that enables
clearer identification of these balances, resulting in a lower risk-adjusted balance.
(7)
Excludes non-trading credit derivatives given guarantee treatment for credit risk capital
purposes.
Regulatory capital and capital ratios
Capital levels for Canadian banks are regulated pursuant to guidelines issued by the OSFI, based on
standards issued by the Bank for International Settlements. Regulatory capital is allocated to two
tiers: Tier 1 and Tier 2. Tier 1 capital comprises the more permanent components of capital and
consists primarily of common shareholders’ equity, non-cumulative preferred shares, the majority of
which do not have conversion features into common shares, and the eligible amount of innovative
capital instruments. In addition, goodwill is deducted from Tier 1 capital.
Tier 2 capital consists mainly of subordinated debentures, trust subordinated notes, the
eligible amount of innovative capital instruments that could not be included in Tier 1 capital, and
an eligible portion of the total general allowance for credit losses. Total capital is
defined as the total of Tier 1 and Tier 2 capital less deductions as prescribed by the OSFI. For
further details on the terms and conditions of our non-cumulative preferred shares and innovative
capital instruments, refer to Notes 17 and 18 of our Consolidated Financial Statements.
Regulatory capital ratios are calculated by dividing Tier 1 and Total capital by RAA. The OSFI
formally establishes risk-based capital targets for deposit-taking institutions in Canada. These
targets are currently a Tier 1 capital ratio of 7% and a Total capital ratio of 10%. In addition to
the Tier 1 and Total capital ratios, Canadian banks are required to ensure that their
assets-to-capital multiple, which is calculated by dividing gross adjusted assets by Total capital,
does not exceed a maximum level prescribed by the OSFI.
The components of regulatory capital and our regulatory capital ratios are shown in the
following table.
Royal Bank of Canada: Annual Report 2007
72 Management’s Discussion and Analysis
Accumulated net unrealized gain on available-for-sale equity securities (4)
105
—
8,605
8,624
Other deductions from capital
Investment in insurance subsidiaries
(2,912
)
(2,795
)
Other
(505
)
(643
)
Total capital
$
28,571
$
26,664
Capital ratios
Tier 1 capital to risk-adjusted assets
9.4
%
9.6
%
Total capital to risk-adjusted assets
11.5
%
11.9
%
Assets-to-capital multiple
19.9X
19.7X
(1)
As defined in the guidelines issued by the OSFI.
(2)
This amount is Shareholders’ equity less preferred shares of $2,050 million and other items not
included in regulatory capital of $117 million.
(3)
Subordinated debentures that are within five years of maturity are subject to straight-line
amortization to zero during their remaining term and, accordingly, are included above at
their amortized value.
(4)
As prescribed by the OSFI, certain components of Accumulated other comprehensive income
(AOCI) are included in the determination of regulatory capital. Accumulated net foreign
currency translation adjustments are included in Tier 1 capital in common equity. Net
unrealized fair value losses on available-for-sale (AFS) equities are deducted in the
determination of Tier 1 capital while net unrealized fair value gains on AFS equities are
included in Tier 2 capital.
As at October 31, 2007, the Tier 1 capital ratio was 9.4% and the Total capital ratio was 11.5%.
The Tier 1 capital ratio was down 20 bps from a year ago. The decrease was largely due to
business growth, including acquisitions, which resulted in an increase in RAA and a higher
goodwill deduction from capital. The impact of our common share repurchases under our normal
course issuer bid also contributed to the decrease. These factors were partially offset by strong
generation of capital from earnings and the issuance of preferred shares.
The Total capital ratio was down 40 bps from a year ago due to growth in RAA and the
redemption of subordinated debentures. These factors were partially offset by the issuance of trust
subordinated notes.
As at October 31, 2007, our assets-to-capital multiple was 19.9 compared to 19.7 a year
ago. Our assets-to-capital multiple remains below the maximum of 23 that is allowed by the
OSFI.
Selected capital management activity
Table 39
(C$ millions)
2007
2006
Dividends
Common
$
2,321
$
1,847
Preferred
88
60
Common shares issued (1)
152
115
Repurchase of common shares — normal course issuer bid (2)
(646
)
(844
)
Preferred shares issued
1,150
600
Preferred shares redeemed
(150
)
(250
)
Subordinated debentures issued
87
—
Repurchase and redemption of debentures (3)
(985
)
(955
)
Issuance of Trust subordinated notes (4)
1,000
—
(1)
Represents cash received for stock options exercised during the year.
(2)
For further details, refer to Note 18 to our Consolidated Financial Statements.
(3)
For further details, refer to Note 16 to our Consolidated Financial Statements.
(4)
For further details, refer to Note 17 to our Consolidated Financial Statements.
Royal Bank of Canada: Annual Report 2007
Management’s Discussion and Analysis 73
In 2007, we undertook several initiatives to support the effective management of our capital.
Tier 1
In 2007, we repurchased 11.8 million common shares for $646 million under our NCIB that expired on
October 31, 2007. Effective November 1, 2007, we renewed our NCIB to repurchase up to 20 million
common shares, or 1.6%, of our outstanding common shares as at October 31, 2007. This NCIB will
expire on October 31, 2008.
On April 26, 2007, we issued $250 million of Non-cumulative First Preferred Shares Series AG
at $25 per share.
On March 14, 2007, we issued $200 million of Non-cumulative First Preferred Shares Series AF
at $25 per share.
On January 19, 2007, we issued $250 million of Non-cumulative First Preferred Shares Series AE
at $25 per share.
On December 13, 2006, we issued $250 million of Non-cumulative First Preferred Shares
Series AD at $25 per share.
On November 24, 2006, we redeemed all of the issued and outstanding $150 million
Non-cumulative First Preferred Shares Series O.
On November 1, 2006, we issued $200 million of Non-cumulative First Preferred Shares Series AC
at $25 per share.
Tier 2
During the year, we purchased US$24 million of our outstanding
US$300 million floating rate debentures maturing in 2085.
On June 26, 2007, we issued JPĄ10 billion (C$87 million) Japanese Yen-denominated subordinated
debentures.
On June 4, 2007, we redeemed all of our outstanding $500 million subordinated debentures due
June 4, 2012, at par value plus accrued interest.
On April 30, 2007, we issued $1 billion of subordinated debentures through RBC Subordinated
Notes Trust, a closed-end trust wholly owned by us.
On November 8, 2006, we redeemed all of our outstanding US$400 million floating-rate
subordinated debentures due November 8, 2011, for 100% of their principal amount plus accrued
interest to the redemption date.
Dividends
Our common share dividend policy reflects our earnings outlook, desired payout ratio and the need
to maintain adequate levels of capital to fund business opportunities. The targeted common share
dividend payout ratio for 2007 was 40% to 50%. In 2007, the dividend payout ratio was 43%, up from
40% in 2006. Common share dividends paid during the year were $2.3 billion, up 26% from a year ago.
Share data and dividends
Table 40
2007
2006
2005
(C$ millions, except number of shares
Number of
Dividends
Number of
Dividends
Number of
Dividends
and per share amounts)
shares (000s)
Amount
per share
shares (000s)
Amount
per share
shares (000s)
Amount
per share
First Preferred (1)
Non-cumulative Series N
12,000
$
300
$
1.18
12,000
$
300
$
1.18
12,000
$
300
$
1.18
Non-cumulative Series O
—
—
—
6,000
150
1.38
6,000
150
1.38
Non-cumulative Series S
—
—
—
—
—
1.33
10,000
250
1.53
Non-cumulative Series W
12,000
300
1.23
12,000
300
1.23
12,000
300
.99
Non-cumulative Series AA
12,000
300
1.11
12,000
300
.71
—
—
—
Non-cumulative Series AB
12,000
300
1.18
12,000
300
.41
—
—
—
Non-cumulative Series AC
8,000
200
1.22
—
—
—
—
—
—
Non-cumulative Series AD
10,000
250
1.06
—
—
—
—
—
—
Non-cumulative Series AE
10,000
250
.95
—
—
—
—
—
—
Non-cumulative Series AF
8,000
200
.77
—
—
—
—
—
—
Non-cumulative Series AG
10,000
250
.65
—
—
—
—
—
—
Total First Preferred
$
2,350
$
1,350
$
1,000
Common shares outstanding
1,276,260
$
7,300
$
1.82
1,280,890
$
7,196
$
1.44
1,293,502
$
7,170
$
1.18
Treasury shares — preferred
(249
)
(6
)
(94
)
(2
)
(91
)
(2
)
Treasury shares — common
(2,444
)
(101
)
(5,486
)
(180
)
(7,053
)
(216
)
Stock options
Outstanding
26,623
32,243
36,481
Exercisable
21,924
26,918
28,863
(1)
As at October 31, 2007, the aggregate number of common shares issuable on the conversion
of the First Preferred Shares Series N was approximately 5,743,000. As at October 31, 2007,
the First Preferred Shares Series W was not yet convertible. The other preferred shares do not
have conversion options.
As at November 23, 2007, the number of outstanding common shares and stock options were
1,276,292,000 and 26,591,000, respectively. As at November 23, 2007, the number of Treasury shares
— preferred and Treasury shares — common were 263,000 and 2,775,000, respectively. For further information
about our share capital, refer to Notes 18 and 21 to our Consolidated Financial Statements.
Royal Bank of Canada: Annual Report 2007 74 Management’s Discussion and Analysis
Increasing amounts of U.S. dollar-denominated assets and deductions from regulatory capital
prompted our development of a policy for hedging our foreign exchange exposure with respect to our
foreign operations. The objectives of our hedging policy are: (i) stabilization of our consolidated
regulatory capital ratios from currency fluctuations, and (ii) mitigation of potential earnings
volatility that might result if we dispose of these investments in foreign operations. When the
Canadian dollar strengthens/weakens against other currencies, the losses/gains on net foreign
investments reduce/increase our capital, as well as our RAA and goodwill of the foreign
currency-denominated operations. Selecting an appropriate level for hedging of our investment in
foreign operations ensures that our regulatory capital ratios are not materially impacted by
currency fluctuations due to the offsetting impact of the proportionate movements in the assets and
capital.
Hedging
our operations denominated in foreign currencies promotes orderly and efficient
capital management. It facilitates compliance with regulatory requirements on an ongoing basis and
enables us to maintain greater control over key capital ratios, thereby reducing the need for
capital transactions in response to currency fluctuations.
Economic Capital
Economic Capital is our own quantification of risks associated with business activities. Economic
Capital is defined as the capital required to remain solvent and in business even under extreme
market conditions, given our desire to maintain a debt rating of at least AA. Economic Capital is
attributed to each business segment in proportion to management’s assessment of the risks. It
allows for comparable performance measurements among our business segments through Return on Equity
(ROE) and Return on Risk Capital (RORC), which are described in detail in the Key performance and
non-GAAP measures section. Accordingly, Economic Capital aids senior management in resource
allocation and serves as a reference point for the assessment of our aggregate risk appetite in
relation to our financial position, recognizing that factors outside the scope of Economic Capital
must also be taken into consideration.
Economic Capital is also used to assess the adequacy of our capital base. Our policy is to
maintain a level of common equity, and other instruments with equity-like permanence and loss
absorption features that exceed Economic Capital with a comfortable cushion.
Economic Capital is calculated and attributed on a wider array of risks than is regulatory
capital, which is primarily limited to credit, market (trading) and, under Basel II, operational
risk. Economic Capital also includes goodwill and intangibles. The identified risks (described
below) for which we calculate Economic Capital are credit, market (trading and non-trading),
operational, business, fixed asset, and insurance. Additionally, Economic Capital allows for
diversification benefits across risks and business segments.
•
Credit risk is the risk of loss associated with a counterparty’s
inability or unwillingness to fulfill its payment obligations.
•
Market risk is the risk of loss that may arise from changes in market
factors such as interest rates, foreign exchange rates, equity or
commodity prices, or the volatility of these factors, in both banking
and trading books. Market risk can be exacerbated by thinly traded or
illiquid markets.
•
Operational risk is the risk of loss resulting from inadequate or
failed internal processes, people and systems or from external events.
•
Business risk is the risk of loss due to variances in volumes, prices
and costs caused by competitive forces, regulatory changes, reputation
and strategic risks.
•
Fixed asset risk is defined as the risk that the value of fixed assets
will be less than their book value at a future date.
•
Insurance risk is the risk of loss that may occur when assumptions
made in insurance product design and pricing activities differ from
actual experience.
For further discussion of credit, market, operational and insurance risk, refer to the Risk
management section.
The calculation and attribution of Economic Capital involves a number of assumptions and
judgments. The methodologies are continually monitored to ensure that the Economic Capital
framework is comprehensive and consistent. Economic Capital measurement models and techniques are
developed by GRM and are subject to independent assessment for appropriateness and reliability. The
models are continually benchmarked to leading industry practices via participation in surveys,
reviews of methodologies and ongoing interaction with external risk-management industry
professionals. The models and input parameters are subject to independent vetting and validation,
as per internal model risk policies.
Economic Capital
Table 41
(C$ millions average balances)
2007
2006
Credit risk
$
6,850
$
5,800
Market risk (trading and non-trading)
2,700
2,500
Operational risk
2,750
2,450
Business and fixed asset risk
2,000
1,800
Insurance risk
150
200
Risk capital
$
14,450
$
12,750
Goodwill and intangibles
5,550
4,650
Economic Capital
$
20,000
$
17,400
Unattributed capital
2,000
2,500
Common equity
$
22,000
$
19,900
Economic Capital increased $2.6 billion from a year ago largely due to increases in Credit
risk capital, Goodwill and intangibles and Operational risk capital. The increases in Credit risk
and Operational risk capital were primarily due to business growth including the impact of our
acquisitions of Flag, the AmSouth branches and Carlin. Goodwill and intangibles increased primarily
as a result of these acquisitions, which were partially offset by the favourable impact of a stronger Canadian dollar on the
translated value of foreign currency-denominated assets.
We remain well capitalized with current levels of qualified equity exceeding the Economic
Capital required to underpin all of our risks.
Royal Bank of Canada: Annual Report 2007
Management’s Discussion and Analysis 75
Management of consolidated capital has become a strategic objective for us as the amount of capital
deployed in subsidiaries to build their businesses has grown in order to maximize profits and
returns to our shareholders. Accordingly, regulatory bodies have focused on ensuring that for all
internationally active banks, capital recognized in regulatory capital measurements is accessible
by the parent entity. At the same time, subsidiaries should be sufficiently capitalized on a
stand-alone basis and in compliance with local regulatory requirements at all times. In addition to
minimum capital requirements, these local regulations may include restrictions on the transfer of
assets in the form of cash, dividends, loans or advances. For further details, refer to Note 18 to
our Consolidated Financial Statements. To balance these regulatory requirements and facilitate the
co-ordinated generation and allocation of capital across the enterprise, we have put in place a
comprehensive subsidiary capital management framework. This framework sets guidelines for defining
capital investments in our subsidiaries and establishes an overall limit for total investment in
those subsidiaries.
While each of our subsidiaries has individual responsibility for calculating, monitoring and
maintaining capital adequacy in compliance with the laws and regulations of its local jurisdiction,
Corporate Treasury is mandated to provide centralized oversight and consolidated capital base
management across various entities.
Other considerations affecting capital
Transition to Basel II
Beginning in the first quarter of 2008, as a result of the OSFI’s adoption of new guidelines based
on “International Convergence of Capital Measurement and Capital Standards: A Revised Framework —
Comprehensive Version (June 2006),” known as Basel II, Canadian banks will be required to calculate
and report their regulatory capital ratios under new measurement standards. We intend to adopt the
Advanced Internal Ratings Based (AIRB) Approach for credit risk
and, initially, the Standardized
Approach for operational risk. There will be no changes in the treatment of market risk. For
details on our Basel II risk approaches, refer to the Risk management section.
As part of the Basel II process, Canadian banks must demonstrate to the OSFI that they have
met the AIRB requirements and that their capital reporting is accurate and of high quality. The
OSFI has been engaged in extensive AIRB approval reviews throughout 2007. Our final application
package, for adoption of the AIRB Approach for most material portfolios, was submitted to the OSFI
on October 31, 2007 and the formal approval decision is expected by December 31, 2007. Once we
achieve full compliance with the AIRB requirements and the OSFI has agreed, we may proceed to
reflect capital below Basel I levels, subject to a two-year transitional floor requirement where our
capital must reflect 90% and 80% of our Basel I capital charges. As required by the OSFI since
November 1, 2006, we have been calculating capital requirements in parallel under both the Basel I
and Basel II rules.
Also, the OSFI has made some allowances for staged implementation. In particular, the OSFI has
approved a waiver for RBC Centura Bank to use the Standardized Approach for credit risk until 2010.
We have also been granted an extension (applicable to non-North American portfolios) for RBC Dexia
IS, which plans to implement the AIRB approach by June 2008. Additionally, the OSFI has approved an
exemption for our Caribbean banking operations to report under the Standardized Approach as long as
that portfolio remains non-material (defined as 1% or less of total balance sheet and credit
equivalent amounts).
Notwithstanding that our risk and capital management processes were already substantially
consistent with the principles embodied in Basel II, we have introduced new policies and enhanced
practices, as appropriate, to facilitate transition to Basel II. These include meeting requisite
standards for:
•
risk rating system design and operation
•
risk quantification, validation, and use of rating systems and internal ratings
•
corporate governance and oversight
•
implementation of a robust internal capital adequacy assessment process (ICAAP).
Our approach to capital adequacy is a co-ordinated effort involving functional units such as GRM,
Corporate Treasury, and Finance. Currently, GRM works in partnership with our businesses to
identify, measure, mitigate and monitor all forms of risk, as described in the Risk management
section. Capital adequacy is assessed and determined with consideration of the full range of risk
controls and capital management tools available to us. We view capital adequacy as a dynamic
process that considers multiple variables, including earnings, asset growth and capital
transactions, within regulatory and financial market constraints in order to meet strategic goals.
Our initial ICAAP was presented to the Audit Committee in October 2007. This ICAAP
incorporates senior management oversight, comprehensive risk-based stress testing of regulatory
capital requirements and our own assessment of risk based on Economic Capital, which is expected to
play a greater role in capital adequacy assessments under Basel II.
Our ICAAP demonstrates that we are well capitalized, having enough capital to meet
management’s assessment of required capital under both normal market conditions and a range of
severe but plausible stress testing scenarios. It serves as an important tool in the establishment
of our internal capital ratios target within the broader context of our capital management
framework, and will be subject to annual review and ongoing development.
In addition to our ICAAP, several of our subsidiaries are required to submit entity level
ICAAPs to local regulators. While these assessments are the responsibility of the respective
subsidiaries, Corporate Treasury liaises with subsidiaries to ensure enterprise-wide consistency.
Our implementation of Basel II will produce capital requirements that may differ from those
calculated under the current Basel I framework. For the most part, this reflects a shift in
calculation methodology from application of prescribed risk weights to processes that are more
closely aligned with our internal risk management practices. Also, Basel II incorporates a specific
charge for operational risk that is not currently required under Basel I. As Basel II will be
applied on a prospective basis, comparability to historical data and capital ratios reported under
Basel I may be difficult.
Disclosure requirements under Basel II will begin with our first quarter 2008 financial
disclosure, and will continue to evolve over 2008, with all quantitative and qualitative
requirements being met with the release of our 2008 annual report.
Accounting considerations
In addition to the regulatory environment, we closely monitor changes in accounting rules and their
potential impact on our capitalization levels. With the recent adoption of the new financial
instruments accounting standards under Canadian GAAP, differences exist between the measurement of
capital as disclosed in the financial statements and that used for regulatory capital purposes. For
example, under Canadian GAAP, available-for-sale (AFS) debt securities are recognized at fair
value, with unrealized gains and losses reported in Accumulated other comprehensive income (AOCI).
In contrast, for regulatory capital purposes, these securities are measured at amortized cost, and
consequently, no unrealized gains or losses are reflected in regulatory capital. Additionally, the
unrealized gains and losses on derivatives designated as cash flow hedges and reported in AOCI are
excluded from regulatory capital.
Capital treatment for equity investments in other entities is determined by a combination of
accounting and legal guidelines based on the size or nature of the investment. Three broad
approaches apply as follows:
•
Consolidation: entities in which we have a controlling interest
must be fully consolidated on our consolidated balance sheet.
Joint ventures are consolidated on a pro rata basis. Consolidated
holdings are capitalized directly by asset class and are not treated as equity investments for regulatory capital calculation purposes.
Royal Bank of Canada: Annual Report 2007 76 Management’s Discussion and Analysis
Deduction: certain holdings are deducted in full from our regulatory capital. These include
all “substantial” investments (as defined by the Bank Act), as well as all investments in insurance
subsidiaries.
•
Risk weighting: unconsolidated equity investments that are not deducted from capital are risk
weighted at a prescribed rate for determination of capital charges.
While Basel II retains the same criteria for determination of capital treatment of equities, the
prescribed risk weightings are generally higher than under Basel I.
OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS
In the normal course of business, we engage in a variety of financial transactions that, under
GAAP, are not recorded on our balance sheet. Off-balance sheet transactions are generally
undertaken for risk management, capital management and/or funding management purposes for our
benefit and the benefit of our clients. These transactions include transactions with special purpose
entities and issuance of guarantees. These transactions give rise to, among other risks, varying
degrees of market, credit, liquidity and funding risk, which are discussed in the Risk management
section.
Derivatives
On November 1, 2006, we adopted three new accounting standards that were issued by the CICA related
to financial instruments. These standards and the impact on our financial position and results of
operations are discussed in the Impact of the new financial instruments accounting standards section
and in Note 1 to our Consolidated Financial Statements. With the adoption of these standards, all
derivatives including derivatives that qualified for hedge accounting are now recognized on the
Consolidated Balance Sheets at fair value. Prior to November 1, 2006, derivatives that qualified for
hedge accounting were not carried at fair value on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. Refer to Note 7
to our Consolidated Financial Statements for detailed information on our derivatives products.
Special purpose entities
Special purpose entities (SPEs) are typically set up for a single, discrete purpose, have a limited
life and serve to legally isolate the financial assets held by the SPE from the selling
organization. They are not operating entities and usually have no employees. SPEs may be variable
interest entities (VIEs) as defined by CICA Accounting Guideline 15, Consolidation of Variable
Interest Entities (AcG-15). Refer to the Critical accounting policies and estimates section and
Notes 1 and 6 to our Consolidated Financial Statements, for our consolidation policy and
information about the VIEs that we have consolidated, or in which we have significant variable
interests. Pursuant to CICA Accounting Guideline 12, Transfers of Receivables (AcG-12), Qualifying
SPEs (QSPE) are legal entities that are demonstrably distinct from the transferor, have limited and
specified permitted activities, have defined asset holdings and may only sell or dispose of selected
assets in automatic response to specified conditions.
We manage and monitor our involvement with SPEs through our Structured Transactions
Oversight Committee. Refer to the Risk management section for further details.
Securitization of our financial assets
We periodically securitize our credit card receivables and residential mortgage loans primarily to
diversify our funding sources and enhance our liquidity position. We also securitize residential
and commercial mortgage loans for sales and trading activities. Gains and losses on securitizations
are included in Non-interest income. Refer to Note 1 to our Consolidated Financial Statements for
our accounting policy for loan securitizations.
In addition to traditional securitizations where we sell our loans and receivables, we also
enter into synthetic securitizations to
transfer risks relating to selected elements of our financial assets without actually
transferring the assets through the use of certain financial instruments.
Credit card receivables
We securitize a portion of our credit card receivables through a SPE on a revolving basis. The SPE
is funded through the issuance of senior and subordinated notes collateralized by the underlying
credit card receivables. The issuances are rated by at least two of DBRS, Moody’s Investors Service
(Moody’s) or Standard & Poor’s Corporation (S&P). This SPE meets the criteria for a QSPE and,
accordingly, as the transferor of the credit card receivables, we are precluded from consolidating
this SPE.
We continue to service the credit card receivables sold to the QSPE and perform an
administrative role for the QSPE. We also provide first-loss protection to the QSPE in two forms. We
have an interest in the excess spread from the QSPE which is subordinate to the QSPE’s obligation
to the holders of its asset-backed securities. Excess spread is the residual net interest income
after all trust expenses have been paid. Our excess spread serves to absorb losses with respect to
the credit card receivables before payments to the QSPE’s noteholders are affected. The present
value of this excess spread is reported as a retained interest within our AFS securities on our
Consolidated Balance Sheets. In addition, we provide loans to the QSPE to pay upfront expenses.
These loans rank subordinate to all notes issued by the QSPE.
Residential mortgage loans
We
securitize Canadian insured residential mortgage loans through the creation of
mortgage-backed securities (MBS) and sell a portion of these MBS to an independent SPE on a
revolving basis. We retain interests in the excess spread on the sold MBS and continue to service
the underlying mortgages that we have securitized for funding and liquidity purposes.
We did not securitize any residential mortgages synthetically in 2007. As at October 31, 2006,
we had synthetically securitized $20 billion in residential mortgage loans through financial
guarantees.
Commercial mortgage loans
We securitize commercial mortgages by selling them in collateral pools, which meet certain
diversification, leverage and debt coverage criteria, to SPEs, one of which is sponsored by us. The
SPEs finance the purchase of these pools by issuing certificates that carry varying degrees of
subordination. The certificates issued by the SPE which we sponsor
range from AAA to B- and are
rated by any two of DBRS, Moody’s and S&P. The most subordinated certificates are unrated. The
certificates represent undivided interests in the collateral pool, and the SPE which we sponsor,
having sold all undivided interests available in the pool, retains none of the risk of the
collateral pools. We do not retain any beneficial interests in the loans sold unless we purchase
some of the securities issued by the SPEs for our own account. We are the primary servicer under
contract with a third-party master servicer for the loans that are sold to the SPE that is
sponsored by us.
Royal Bank of Canada: Annual Report 2007 Management’s Discussion and Analysis 77
All residential mortgages securitized are Canadian insured mortgages.
(2)
Securities purchased during the securitization process.
Securitization
activities during 2007
During the year, we securitized $13.3 billion of residential mortgages, of which $6.2 billion were
sold and, $3.7 billion were reinvested in revolving securitizations and the remaining $3.4 billion were retained. We also securitized $1.9
billion of commercial mortgages and purchased $48 million
(principal value) related securities
during the securitization process. Refer to Note 5 to our Consolidated Financial Statements for
further details and the amounts of impaired and past due loans that we manage and any losses
recognized on securitization activities during the year.
Capital
trusts
We issue innovative capital instruments, RBC Trust Capital Securities (TruCS) and RBC Trust
Subordinated Notes (TSNs), through three SPEs: (i) RBC Capital Trust (Trust), (ii) RBC Capital
Trust II (Trust II) and (iii) RBC Trust Subordinated Trust (Trust III). We consolidated Trust but
do not consolidate Trust II or Trust III because we are not the Primary Beneficiary since we are not
exposed to the majority of the expected losses, and we do not have a significant interest in these
trusts. As at October 31, 2007, we held the residual interest of $1 million and $1 million (2006 —
$1 million and nil) in Trust II and Trust III, respectively. We had a loan receivable of $40
million (2006 — $42 million) from Trust II and of $30 million from Trust III (2006 — nil), and
reported the senior deposit notes of $900 million and $999.8 million (2006 — $900 million and nil)
that we issued to Trust II and Trust III in our deposit liabilities. Under certain circumstances,
TruCS of Trust II will be automatically exchanged for our preferred shares and TSNs exchanged for
our subordinated notes without prior consent of the holders. In addition, TruCS holders of Trust II
have the right to exchange for our preferred shares as outlined in Note 17 to our Consolidated
Financial Statements.
Interest expenses on the senior deposit notes issued to Trust II and Trust III amounted to $52
million and $23.6 million, respectively (2006 — $52 million and nil, 2005 — $52 million and nil)
during the year. For further details on the capital trusts and the terms of the TruCS and TSNs
issued and outstanding, refer to the Capital management section and Note 17 to our Consolidated
Financial Statements.
Securitization of client financial assets
Within our Global Securitization Group, our principal relationship with SPEs comes in the form of
administering seven multi-seller asset-backed commercial paper conduit programs (multi-seller
conduits) – four in Canada and three in the United States. We are involved in the multi-seller
conduit markets because our clients value these transactions, they offer us a growing source of
revenue and they generate a favourable risk-adjusted return for us. Our clients primarily utilize
multi-seller conduits to diversify their financing sources and to reduce funding
costs by leveraging the value of high-quality collateral. The multi-seller conduits purchase
various financial assets from clients and finance the purchases by issuing highly rated
asset-backed commercial paper. The multi-seller conduits typically purchase the financial assets
as part of a securitization transaction by our clients. In these situations, the sellers of the
financial assets continue to service the respective assets and generally provide some amount of
first-loss protection on the assets.
The multi-seller conduits also financed assets that were either in the form of securities,
including collateralized debt obligations (CDOs) or instruments that closely resemble securities
such as credit-linked notes. The credit quality of these transactions is very high, often in the
highest available rating categories established by the rating agencies that assign ratings to these
types of securities or security-like instruments. In these situations, the multi-seller conduit is
often one of many investors in the securities or security-like instruments.
The commercial paper issued by each multi-seller conduit is in the multi-seller conduit’s own name
with recourse to the financial assets owned by the multi-seller conduit. The multi-seller conduit
commercial paper is non-recourse to us except through our participation in liquidity and/or credit
enhancement facilities, and non-recourse to the other multi-seller conduits that we administer.
We do not maintain any ownership or retained interests in these multi-seller conduits. We
provide services such as transaction structuring and administration as specified by the multi-seller
conduit program documents, for which we receive fees. In addition, we provide backstop liquidity
facilities and partial credit enhancements to the multi-seller conduits. Our maximum exposure to
loss under these facilities is $42.9 billion for 2007 and $35.1 billion for 2006. The increase in
liquidity and credit facilities is due to the increase in the multi-seller conduits’ activities during the
year. We have no rights to, or control of, the assets owned by the multi-seller conduits. Fee
revenue for all such services, which is reported as Non-interest income, amounted to $72 million
during the year (2006 — $60 million, 2005 — $58 million).
Total commitments and amounts outstanding under liquidity and credit enhancement facilities
for the multi-seller conduits as at October 31, 2007 and 2006, which are also included in our
discussion in the Guarantees section, are shown below:
Liquidity and credit enhancement facilities
Table 43
2007
2006
Maximum
Maximum
exposure
exposure
(C$ millions)
Committed
to loss
Outstanding
Committed
to loss
Outstanding
Backstop liquidity facilities
$
42,567
$
38,726
$
—
$
34,880
$
31,686
$
—
Credit enhancement facilities
4,185
4,185
—
3,404
3,404
—
Royal Bank of Canada: Annual Report 2007 78 Management’s Discussion and Analysis
The
following is a summary of our maximum exposure to loss categorized by
securitized client asset type in the multi-seller
conduits for the years ended October 31, 2007 and 2006.
Maximum exposure to loss categorized by client asset type
Table 44
(C$ millions)
2007
2006
Outstanding securitized assets
Auto loans and leases
$
12,157
$
7,073
Asset-backed securities
164
195
Consumer loans
1,769
2,659
Credit cards
11,125
8,856
Dealer floor plan receivables
496
—
Electricity market receivables
306
306
Equipment receivables
2,279
2,132
Insurance premiums
610
664
Other loans
288
—
Residential mortgages
3,793
4,358
Securities
1,669
1,497
Student loans
2,654
2,928
Trade receivables
5,133
3,537
Truck loans and leases
468
885
Other
—
—
Total
$
42,911
$
35,090
All the multi-seller conduits were restructured in 2004. As part of the restructurings, an
unrelated third party (expected loss investor) agreed to absorb credit losses, up to a maximum
contractual amount, that may occur in the future on the assets in the multi-seller conduits
(multi-seller conduit first-loss position) before us and the multi-seller conduit’s debt holders. In
return for assuming this multi-seller conduit first-loss position, the expected loss investor is
paid by the multi-seller conduit a return commensurate with its risk position. Moreover, each
multi-seller conduit has granted to the expected loss investor material voting rights, including
the right to approve any transaction prior to the multi-seller conduit purchasing and financing a
transaction. As a result of the restructurings, we do not consolidate any of the multi-seller
conduits. As a result of increased activities during 2007, these seven multi-seller conduits have
financial assets totalling $29.3 billion as at October 31, 2007 (2006 — $24.8 billion). The maximum
assets that may have to be purchased by the conduits under purchase commitments outstanding as at
October 31, 2007 were $41.8 billion (2006 — $34.3 billion).
Creation
of credit investment products
We use SPEs to generally transform credit derivatives into
cash instruments, to distribute credit risk and to create customized credit products to meet the
needs of investors with specific requirements. As part of this process, we may transfer our assets
to the SPEs with an obligation to buy these assets back in the future and may enter into derivative
contracts with these SPEs in order to convert various risk factors such as yield, currency or
credit risk of underlying assets to meet the needs of the investors. In this role as derivative
counterparty to the SPE, we also assume the associated counterparty credit risk of the SPE.
These SPEs often issue notes. The notes may be rated by external rating agencies, as well as
listed on a stock exchange, and are generally traded via recognized bond clearing systems. While
the majority of the notes are expected to be sold on a “buy and hold” basis, we may occasionally
act as market maker. We do not, however, provide any SPE with guarantees or other similar support
commitments; instead we buy credit protection from these SPEs through credit derivatives. The
investors in the notes ultimately bear the cost of any payments made by the SPE under these credit
derivatives. We consolidate the SPEs in which our investments in the notes expose us to a majority
of the expected losses.
There are many functions required to create such a product. We fulfill some of these functions
and independent third parties or specialist service providers fulfill the remainder. Currently we
act as sole arranger and swap provider for SPEs where we are involved and, in most cases, act as
paying and issuing agent as well. As with all our trading derivatives, the derivatives with these
SPEs are carried at fair value in derivative assets and liabilities.
The assets in these SPEs amounted to $5.2 billion as at October 31, 2007 (2006 — $3.8
billion), of which $.3 billion were consolidated as at
October 31, 2007 (2006 — $.7 billion). The majority of
the increase in these assets is due to the creation of new SPEs in
2007.
Structured finance
We occasionally invest in off-balance sheet entities in the form of loan substitute and equity
investments that are part of transactions structured to achieve a desired outcome, such as limiting
exposure to specific assets or risks, obtaining indirect (and usually risk mitigated) exposure to
financial assets, funding specific assets, supporting an enhanced yield and meeting client
requirements. These transactions usually yield a higher return or provide lower-cost funding on an
aftertax basis than financing non-SPE counterparties, holding an interest in financial assets
directly, or receiving on-balance sheet funding. These transactions are structured to mitigate
risks associated with directly investing in the underlying financial assets, or directly receiving
funding, and may be structured so that our ultimate credit risk is that of a non-SPE, which in most
cases is another financial institution. Exit mechanisms are built into these transactions to curtail
exposure from changes in law or regulations. We consolidate structured finance VIEs
in which our interests expose us to a majority of the expected
losses. In 2007, we reduced our total investments in certain
transactions. The unconsolidated entities
in which we have significant investments or loans had total assets of $4.8 billion as at October 31,2007 (2006 — $6.9 billion). At at October 31, 2007, our total investments in and loans to these
entities were $2.5 billion (2006 — $2.9 billion), which are reflected on our Consolidated Balance
Sheets.
Investment funds
We enter into derivative transactions with third parties including mutual funds, unit investment
trusts and other investment funds for fees to provide their investors with the desired exposure and
hedge our exposure from these derivatives by investing in other funds. We consolidate the
investment funds when our participation in the derivative or our investment in other funds exposes
us to a majority of the respective expected losses. The total assets held in the funds where we
have significant exposure and which we did not consolidate were $1.6 billion as at October 31, 2007
(2006 — $3.6 billion). The decrease is primarily due to a
reduction of assets in one of the investment funds. As at October 31, 2007, our total exposure was $423 million (2006 — $319
million).
Trusts, mutual and pooled funds
Our joint venture RBC Dexia IS provides global custody, fund and pension administration of client
assets as well as the provision of shareholders services, foreign exchange, securities lending and
other related services. With respect to trusteeship and/or custodian services for personal and
institutional trusts, RBC Dexia IS has a fiduciary responsibility to act in the best interests of
the beneficiaries of the trusts. RBC Dexia IS earns fees for providing these services and we include
50% of these fees in our revenue, representing our share of interest in the joint venture. Refer to
Note 9 to our Consolidated Financial Statements for more details.
We manage assets in mutual and pooled funds and earn fees at market rates from these funds,
but do not guarantee either principal or returns to investors in any of these funds.
Guarantees
We issue guarantee products, as defined by the CICA Accounting Guideline 14, Disclosure of
Guarantees (AcG-14), in return for fees recorded in Non-interest income. Significant types of
guarantee products we have provided to third parties include credit derivatives, written put
options, securities lending indemnifications, backstop liquidity facilities, financial standby
letters of credit, performance guarantees, stable value products, credit enhancements, mortgage
loans sold with recourse and certain indemnification agreements.
Royal Bank of Canada: Annual Report 2007 Management’s Discussion and Analysis 79
Due to the adoption of the three new financial instrument accounting standards on November 1,2006, financial guarantees are now recognized at inception at the fair value of the obligation
undertaken in issuing the guarantee. Subsequent measurement of financial guarantees at fair value is
not required unless the financial guarantee qualifies as a derivative. As the carrying value of these
financial guarantees does not reflect our maximum potential amount of future payments, we continue to
consider guarantees as off-balance sheet arrangements. Prior to November 1, 2006, financial
guarantees were required to be disclosed only in the notes to our Consolidated Financial
Statements.
Our maximum potential amount of future payments in relation to our guarantee products as at
October 31, 2007, amounted to $152 billion (2006 — $125 billion). In addition, as at October 31,2007, RBC Dexia IS securities lending indemnifications totalled $63.5 billion (2006 — $45.6
billion); we are exposed to 50% of this amount. The maximum potential amount of future payments
represents the maximum risk of loss if there was a total default by the guaranteed parties, without
consideration of possible recoveries under recourse provisions, insurance policies or collateral
held or pledged.
As at October 31, 2007, we had $40.4 billion in backstop liquidity facilities related to
asset-backed commercial paper programs, of which 96% were committed to RBC-administered
multi-seller conduits.
Note 27 to our Consolidated Financial Statements provides detailed information regarding the
nature and maximum potential exposure for the above-mentioned types of guarantee products.
Commercial commitments
We also provide commercial commitments to our clients to help them meet their financing needs. On
behalf of our clients we undertake written documentary and commercial letters of credit,
authorizing a third party to draw drafts on us up to a stipulated amount and typically having
underlying shipments of goods as collateral. We make
commitments to extend credit, which represent unused portions of authorizations to extend credit in
the form of loans, bankers’ acceptances or letters of credit. We also have uncommitted amounts for
which we retain the option to extend credit to a borrower. These guarantees and commitments exposed
us to liquidity and funding risks. The following is a summary of our off-balance sheet commercial
commitments.
Commercial commitments (1)
Table 45
(C$ millions)
Within 1 year
1 to 3 years
Over 3 to 5 years
Over 5 years
Total
Documentary and commercial letters of credit
$
477
$
24
$
—
$
—
$
501
Commitments to extend credit and liquidity facilities
40,015
30,053
22,596
8,924
101,588
Uncommitted amounts (2)
47,110
—
—
—
47,110
$
87,602
$
30,077
$
22,596
$
8,924
$
149,199
(1)
Based on remaining term to maturity.
(2)
Uncommitted amounts represent an amount for which we retain the option to extend credit to a
borrower.
RISK MANAGEMENT
Overview
Our business activities expose us to a wide variety of risks in virtually all aspects of our
operations. We manage these risks by seeking to ensure that business activities and transactions
provide an appropriate balance of return for the risk assumed and remain within our risk appetite.
Our management of risk is supported by sound risk management practices and effective
enterprise risk management frameworks. The cornerstone of these frameworks is a strong risk
management culture, supported by a robust enterprise-wide set of policies, procedures and limits,
which involve our risk management professionals, business segments and other functional teams. This
partnership is designed to ensure the ongoing alignment of business strategies and activities
within our risk appetite.
Risk appetite
Our risk appetite framework provides a structured approach to defining the amount and type of risk
we are able and willing to accept in the pursuit of our business objectives. The risk appetite
framework includes:
•
Identification of regulatory constraints that restricts our ability to
accept risk and helps us to define our Risk Capacity, which represents
the maximum amount and type of risk we can accept
•
Establishment and regular confirmation of Self-Imposed Constraints &
Drivers where we have chosen to limit or otherwise influence the amount
of risk we undertake
•
Translation of Risk Appetite into Risk Limits and Tolerances that
guide our businesses in their risk taking activity
•
Periodic measurement and monitoring of our Risk Profile, which compares
actual exposure to our established Risk Limits and Tolerances.
Risk management principles
We apply the following six overarching principles in the identification,
monitoring and management of risk throughout the organization:
(i)
Balancing risk and reward is achieved through (a) aligning risk appetite with business
strategy, (b) diversifying risk, (c) pricing appropriately for risk, (d) mitigating risk
through preventive controls, and (e) transferring risk to third parties
(ii)
Management of risk is shared at all levels of the organization. Business management is
accountable for all risks assumed in their operations, with direction and oversight provided
by Group Risk Management (GRM), Global Technology and Operations (GTO), and Global Functions
(iii)
Effective decision-making is based on a strong understanding of risk
(iv)
All business activities are conducted with the view of not risking our reputation
(v)
Assuring that services we provide are suitable for and understood by our clients
(vi)
Applying appropriate judgment is required throughout the organization in order to manage
risk.
Royal Bank of Canada: Annual Report 2007
Management’s Discussion and Analysis 80
Our overall risk governance structure is presented below. It illustrates the roles and
responsibilities of the various stakeholders.
Board and its committees
The Board of Directors provides oversight and carries out its risk management mandate through the
Conduct Review and Risk Policy Committee (CR&RPC) and the Audit Committee.
CR&RPC is designed to ensure that we have risk policies, processes and controls in place to
manage significant risks and ensure compliance with the Bank Act (Canada) and other relevant laws
and regulations.
Audit Committee provides oversight over the integrity of the financial statements and reviews
the adequacy and effectiveness of internal controls and the control environment, and ensures that
policies related to liquidity, funding and capital management are in place.
Group Executive (GE) and Group Risk Committee (GRC)
GE is our senior management team and is led by our President and Chief Executive Officer (CEO). GE
has overall responsibility for our strategy and its execution by establishing the “tone at the
top.” Their risk oversight role is executed primarily through the mandate of GRC and the five
supporting risk committees as follows:
•
The Asset and Liability Committee (ALCO) reviews, recommends, and
approves policy frameworks pertaining to capital management,
structural interest rate risk management, funds transfer pricing,
liquidity and funding and subsidiary governance
•
The Ethics and Compliance Committee directly supports our management
of regulatory, compliance and reputation risk
•
The Policy Review Committee acts as the senior risk approval authority
relating to policies, products and services
•
The Structured Transactions Oversight Committee reviews structured
transactions and complex credits
•
The USA Corporate Governance Committee is responsible for all
corporate governance matters of our U.S. operations.
GRM and Corporate Treasury
GRM works in full partnership with our businesses to identify, assess, mitigate and monitor all
forms of risk. Together with the CEO and other members of GE, the Chief Risk Officer (CRO) and GRM
are primarily responsible for the promotion of our risk management culture. The CRO and GRM
responsibilities include:
•
Establishing comprehensive risk identification and approval processes
•
Establishing appropriate methodologies for risk measurement
•
Establishing risk controls and limits to ensure appropriate risk
diversification and optimization of risk and return on both a portfolio
and transactional basis
•
Monitoring risk levels and reporting to senior management and the
Board of Directors on major risks we assume or face
•
Acting as the catalyst in defining and communicating our risk appetite.
Corporate Treasury is responsible for the management, oversight and reporting of our capital
position, structural interest rate risk, and liquidity and funding risks. Corporate Treasury
recommends policies and authorities relating to the identification, measurement and management of
liquidity and funding risk through ALCO and GRC for approval by the Audit Committee.
Business segments and corporate support groups
The business segments, GTO and Global Functions also have responsibility for the management of
risk. These responsibilities include (i) accountability for their risks, (ii) alignment of business
strategy with risk appetite, and (iii) identification, control and management of their risks.
Risk measurement
Our ability to measure risks is a key component of our enterprise-wide risk management process.
Certain measurement methodologies are common to a number of risk types, while others only apply to
a single risk type. While quantitative risk measurement is important, we also place reliance on
qualitative factors. Our measurement models and techniques are continually subject to independent
assessment by GRM for appropriateness and reliability. For those risk types that are hard to
quantify, we place greater emphasis on qualitative risk factors and assessment of activities to
gauge the overall level of risk in order to ensure that they are within our risk appetite.
Expected loss
Expected loss represents those losses that are statistically expected
to occur in the normal course of business in a given period of time.
With respect to credit risk, the key parameters used to measure our expected loss are the
probability of default (PD), loss given default (LGD) and exposure at default (EAD). These
parameters are determined based on historical experience, supplemented by benchmarking and updated
on a regular basis, and are defined as follows:
•
PD: An estimated percentage that represents the probability that
obligors within a specific rating grade or for a particular pool of
exposures will default within a one-year period
•
LGD: An estimated percentage of EAD that is expected to be lost in the
event of default of an obligor
•
EAD: An estimated dollar value of the expected gross exposure of a
facility upon default of the obligor before specific provisions or
partial write-offs.
With respect to trading market risk, we use a statistical technique known as Value-at-Risk to
measure expected loss. It is a generally accepted risk management concept that uses statistical
models to estimate within a given level of confidence the maximum loss in market value we would
experience in our trading portfolio from an adverse one-day movement in market rates and prices.
For further details, refer to the Market risk section.
Unexpected loss and Economic Capital
Unexpected loss is a statistical estimate of the amount by which actual losses can exceed expected
loss over a specified time horizon, measured at a specified level of confidence. On an enterprise-wide
basis, we use Economic Capital to estimate the unexpected loss associated with our business
activities. We calculate Economic Capital by estimating the level of capital that is necessary to
cover risks consistent with our desired solvency standard and desired debt rating.
Royal Bank of Canada: Annual Report 2007 Management’s Discussion and Analysis 81
The use of Economic Capital as a risk measure enables us to assess performance on a comparable
risk-adjusted basis at the transaction and portfolio levels. For further information, refer to the
Capital management section.
Sensitivity analysis and stress testing
Sensitivity analysis and stress testing help us ensure that the risks we take remain within our
risk appetite and that our level of capital remains adequate. Under sensitivity analysis, model
inputs and assumptions are varied to assess how significantly the risk measure changes. Stress
testing helps us determine the effects of potentially extreme market volatility on our portfolios.
Stress scenarios are conservatively based on unlikely but possible adverse market events and
economy-wide developments.
Model validation
To ensure robustness of our measurement techniques, model validation is carried out by our risk
professionals independent of those responsible for the development and use of the models and
assumptions.
Risk control
Our enterprise-wide risk management approach is supported by a comprehensive set of risk controls.
This includes the development and communication of policies, establishment of formal risk review
and approval processes, and the establishment of delegated authorities and limits. The
implementation of robust risk controls enables the optimization of risk and return on both a
portfolio and a transactional basis.
Risk policy architecture
Our risk management frameworks and policies are structured into the
following four levels:
Level 1:
Enterprise Risk Management Framework: This framework serves as the foundation of our
risk management frameworks and policies, and sets the “tone at the top.”
Level 2:
Risk-Specific Frameworks: These individual frameworks
elaborate on each risk type and explain the following areas:
• Mechanisms for identifying, measuring, monitoring and reporting of risk
• Key policies
• Respective roles and responsibilities related to a specific risk.
Level 3:
Enterprise Risk Policies: These policies are considered our minimum requirements for
our business segments, GTO and Global Functions with respect to various risk types.
Level 4:
Business Segments and GTO Specific Policies and
Procedures: These policies and procedures are established by the business segments and GTO
to manage the risks that are unique to their operations.
Risk review and approval processes
Our risk review and approval processes are established by GRM based on the nature, size and
complexity of the risk involved. In general, the risk review and approval process involves a
formal review and approval by an individual, group or committee that is independent from the
originator. The approval responsibilities are governed by delegated authorities based on the
following four categories:
•
Projects and Initiatives: Documentation of risk assessment is
formalized through the requirement that each Project Appropriation
Request (PAR) be reviewed and approved by GRM and Global Functions
•
New Products and Services: The policies and procedures for the approval
of new or amended products and services have been
developed to ensure that our products and services are subject to a broad and robust review and
approval process that fully considers associated risks, while striving to facilitate business
opportunities
•
Transactions: We ensure that risk assessment processes are in place for the review and
approval of all types of transactions, including credit transactions
•
Structured Transactions and Complex Credits: The Structured Transactions Oversight Committee
reviews new structured products and transactions with significant reputation, legal,
accounting, regulatory or tax risks.
Authorities and limits
The Board of Directors, through the CR&RPC, delegates the setting of credit, market and insurance
risk limits to the CEO, Chief Operating Officer (COO) and CRO. These delegated authorities allow
these officers to set risk tolerances, approve geographic (country and region) and industry sector
exposure limits within defined parameters, and establish underwriting and inventory limits for
trading and investment banking activities. These delegated authorities are reviewed and approved
annually by the Board of Directors and the CR&RPC. GRM is responsible for establishing:
•
The criteria whereby these authorities may be further delegated
•
The minimum requirements for documenting, communicating and monitoring the use of these
delegated authorities.
CR&RPC must approve any transactions which exceed management’s delegated authorities.
The Board of Directors through the Audit Committee approves risk limits for controlling
liquidity and funding risk. These limits form part of our liquidity management framework and are a
key risk control designed to ensure that reliable and cost-effective sources of cash are available
to satisfy our current and prospective commitments, both on- and off-balance sheet.
Reporting
Enterprise level risk monitoring and reporting is a critical component of our enterprise risk
management program and supports the ability of senior management and the Board of Directors to
effectively perform their risk management and oversight responsibilities.
Internal reporting is provided in the Enterprise Risk Report on a regular basis with the
purpose of ensuring senior management and the Board of Directors receive timely and actionable
forward-looking risk reporting on significant risk issues impacting our organization. We also have
individual risk-specific reporting, which aligns with governance and relevant laws and regulations.
Annually, the CRO provides the Board of Directors with a comprehensive review of emerging risks
facing the organization as a whole as well as those facing the business segments. External
reporting is provided as required by law and other relevant regulations. Regular reporting on risks
is provided to stakeholders including regulators, external ratings agencies and analysts.
Basel II
As at November 1, 2007, we have implemented Basel II, which more closely aligns regulatory capital
requirements with our underlying risk profile and internal risk management practices compared to
Basel I. Basel II represents a major change in bank regulations, in that it allows banks to select
from a menu of approaches to calculate the minimum capital required to support the credit risk and
operational risks they undertake.
Royal Bank of Canada: Annual Report 2007
82 Management’s Discussion and Analysis
The Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions Canada (OSFI) expects each major bank in
Canada to adopt the Advanced Internal Ratings Based (AIRB) Approach for all of its material
portfolios, although some flexibility is permitted regarding the timing of adoption. For further
details, refer to the Capital management section. Once our AIRB internal ratings systems have been
approved by the OSFI, we are permitted to assess the credit risk of our exposures using our
internal rating systems, and to employ the risk measurements produced by those ratings systems in
the calculation of required regulatory capital.
Operational risk
The OSFI has been less prescriptive with respect to the calculation of capital for operational
risk. The two options available to us under Basel II are the Standardized Approach and the
Advanced Measurement Approach (AMA). We have elected to implement the more sophisticated risk management and
governance practices that are required under AMA, but will initially use the Standardized Approach
for the calculation of operational risk capital.
The Standardized Approach provides the benefits of sounder operational risk management and
governance, positioning us to migrate to AMA once advances in measurement capabilities warrant the
adoption of a model-based calculation approach. The OSFI fully endorses this strategy of focusing
on sound management of operational risk while working towards more advanced measurement
capabilities.
Market risk
Basel II treatment of market risk is unchanged from the treatment
under Basel I.
Risk Pyramid
We use a pyramid to identify and categorize our risks. These risks are organized vertically within
the Risk Pyramid to reflect the degree of controllability. The Risk Pyramid provides us with a
common language and discipline for the identification and assessment of risk in our businesses,
products, initiatives, acquisitions and alliances. The Risk Pyramid is reviewed regularly to
ensure that all key risks are reflected and ranked appropriately.
The base of the pyramid — The risk categories along the base of the Risk Pyramid are those over
which we have the greatest level of control and influence. These are credit, market, liquidity and
funding, and insurance risks. Operational risk, while still viewed as one of the risks over which
we have the most control and influence, is ranked on a higher level than the other highly
controllable risks. This ranking acknowledges the level of controllability associated with people,
systems and external events.
The middle of the pyramid — Strategic and reputation risks, while more controllable than the risks
at the top of the pyramid, are considered less controllable compared to the risks at the base of
the pyramid. Strategic risk arises in one of two situations: (i) we choose the wrong strategy, or
(ii) we choose the right strategy, but execute it poorly. Reputation risk is placed in the middle
of the pyramid to denote the fair degree of control and influence we can use to manage this risk
type, which generally occurs in connection with other risks, primarily regulatory and legal, and
operational risks.
The top of the pyramid — Systemic risk is placed at the top of the Risk Pyramid, which is the
least controllable and typically cannot be managed through any type of direct mitigation efforts,
such as risk limits and/or portfolio diversification. Regulatory and legal and competitive risks,
which can be viewed as somewhat controllable, can be influenced through our role as a corporate
entity, and as an active participant in the Canadian and global financial services industry.
CREDIT RISK
Credit risk is the risk of loss associated with a counterparty’s inability or unwillingness to
fulfill its payment obligations. Credit risk may be direct (issuer, debtor, obligor or policyholder)
or indirect to a secondary obligor (guarantor or reinsurer).
We offer a wide range of credit products and services to individual and business clients
within Canada, the United States and in numerous countries. Core products offered include loans,
residential and commercial mortgages, credit cards, lines of credit and letters of credit.
Specialized credit services include asset-backed financing, margin lending, securities lending and
project finance. The majority of our businesses offer credit products and services. Credit risk is
also incurred through other activities not directly linked to the provision of
credit products and services to clients, such as short-term investments relating to liquidity
management and insurance business investment activities.
Our
credit offerings are a significant driver of overall business performance. The failure to
effectively manage credit risk across the organization and all products, services and activities
can have a direct, immediate and material impact on our earnings and reputation.
Our credit risk management principles are guided by the six overall risk management principles
discussed in the Risk management overview section. In particular, the following two principles
are complemented by the items below with respect to credit risk management.
Royal Bank of Canada: Annual Report 2007
Management’s Discussion and Analysis 83
Mitigating credit risk through preventive and detective controls
•
Transferring credit risk to third parties where appropriate through approved credit risk
mitigation techniques, including hedging activities and insurance coverage.
Our business activities are conducted with the view of not risking our reputation. Therefore, there
are certain types of clients and transactions that we avoid in order to maintain our reputation,
such as:
•
Financing the manufacture of equipment or material for nuclear,
chemical or biological warfare and landmines
•
Financing of Internet gambling businesses
•
Granting credit to entities subject to economic sanctions
•
Credit transactions that facilitate illegal activity, or contribute to
misleading financial statements or regulatory reporting
•
Credit transactions involving undocumented agreements, disbursements
or funds transfers
•
Granting credit to a business or individual engaged in activities
inconsistent with generally accepted standards of ethical behaviour in
the community.
Responsibilities
We deem credit risk management to be an enterprise-wide activity. The following provides a high-level
overview of the key committees involved in the management of credit risk.
Board of Directors and Conduct Review & Risk Policy Committee
•
Shapes and influences credit risk culture; approves credit risk appetite.
•
Ensures that management has in place frameworks, policies, processes and procedures to manage credit risk (including
approval authority for Credit Risk Management Framework and key enterprise-wide credit risk policies), and evaluates our
effectiveness in managing credit risk.
•
Approves credit risk limits, delegates approval authorities to the CEO, COO, CRO, and approves credit transactions in
excess of management’s authorities.
•
Reviews enterprise-wide credit reporting, significant exposures and exceptions to limits.
Group Risk Committee
•
Ensures credit risk profile is consistent with strategic objectives.
•
Ensures that there are ongoing, appropriate and effective risk management policies, processes and procedures to manage
credit risk (including recommending the Credit Risk Management Framework and key enterprise-wide credit risk policies to
the Board of Directors for approval).
•
Approves credit policies and products with significant risk implications, as referred by the CRO.
•
Recommends credit transactions in excess of management’s authority to the Board of Directors for approval.
•
Reviews enterprise-wide credit reporting, significant exposures and processes, and ensures that appropriate and timely
information is provided to the Board of Directors on matters relating to credit risk and its management.
Policy Review Committee
•
Reviews and recommends approval of the Credit Risk Management Framework.
•
Approves enterprise-wide credit risk policies.
•
Approves new and amended business specific credit risk
policies and products with significant risk implications.
Structured Transactions Oversight Committee
•
Provides risk oversight of structured transactions and
complex credits, including identification and mitigation of risks.
•
Reviews and approves products and transactions referred to it in accordance with our policies.
Risk measurement
Given the
potential for credit risk to significantly impact our earnings, it is critical that we
accurately quantify credit risk at both the individual obligor and portfolio levels. This allows us
to effectively estimate expected credit losses and minimize unexpected losses in order to manage and limit
earnings volatility.
Our
credit risk exposures are classified as wholesale and retail portfolios, and we employ
different risk measurement processes for each portfolio. The wholesale portfolio comprises
business, sovereign and bank exposures, which include mid-size to large corporations and certain
small businesses that are managed on an individual client basis. The retail portfolio is comprised
of residential mortgages and personal, credit card and small business loans, which are managed on a
pooled basis. This categorization of exposures is consistent with Basel II guidelines, which
require banks to disclose their exposures based on how they manage their business and risks.
Credit risk rating systems are designed to assess and quantify the risk inherent in credit
activities in an accurate and consistent manner. We use a two-dimensional rating system for both
wholesale and retail credit exposures.
Wholesale credit portfolio
The wholesale credit risk rating system is designed to measure and identify the risk inherent in
our credit activities in an accurate and consistent manner along two dimensions.
In
the first dimension, each obligor is assigned a borrower risk rating
(BRR), which reflects an
assessment of the credit quality of the obligor. Each BRR has a probability of default (PD)
assigned to it. This PD is an estimate of the probability that an obligor with a certain BRR will
default within a one-year time horizon. The BRR differentiates the riskiness of obligors and
represents our evaluation of the obligor’s ability and willingness to meet its contractual
obligations despite
Royal Bank of Canada: Annual Report 2007
84 Management’s Discussion and Analysis
adverse or stressed business conditions, troughs in the business cycle, economic downturns or
unexpected events that may occur. The assignment of BRRs is based on the evaluation of obligors’
business and financial performance against several risk factors. We use Risk Criteria Papers, which
present a structured process for the consistent identification and analysis of material information
needed to assess obligors in various industry sectors. Generally, the key risk factors assessed
include industry, markets, firm competitiveness, company strategy and
management quality, financial
performance and access to funds. Risk Criteria Papers provide guidance on what to emphasize in the
analysis of companies within an industry sector, and provide weightings, which may vary from
industry to industry. Our internal risk ratings are reviewed at least on an annual basis.
Our rating system is largely consistent with that of external rating agencies. The following
table provides a mapping of our 22-grade internal risk ratings compared to ratings by external
rating agencies.
Internal ratings map
Table 46
Moody’s Investors
Rating
Standard & Poor’s
Service
Description
1 to 4
AAA to AA-
Aaa to Aa3
5 to 7
A+ to A-
A1 to A3
Investment Grade
8 to 10
BBB+ to BBB-
Baa1 to Baa3
11 to 13
BB+ to BB-
Ba1 to Ba3
14 to 16
B+ to B-
B1 to B3
Non-investment Grade
17 to 20
CCC+ to CC
Caa1 to Ca
21 to 22
C to D
C to Bankruptcy
Impaired/Default
In the second dimension, loss given default (LGD) represents the portion of exposure at default
(EAD) expected to be lost when an obligor defaults. LGD rates are largely driven by factors such
as seniority of debt, collateral security, client type, and the industry in which the obligor
operates. EAD represents an estimate of the expected gross exposure of a credit facility at the
time of default of the obligor. At default the obligor may have drawn the facility fully or have
repaid some of the principal. We estimate EAD based on the outstanding portion and an estimated
amount of the undrawn portion that is expected to be drawn at the time of default. The estimation
of these parameters represents a critical part of our credit rating system. It is a process of
quantifying the risk associated with obligors and the related facilities by estimating and
assigning values to the parameters. Parameter estimations are based on historical internal
experience, and are benchmarked to external data where applicable. While PD is used at the obligor
level, LGD and EAD are estimated for the various credit facilities under that obligor.
These ratings and risk measurements are used in the determination of our expected losses,
unexpected losses as well as economic and regulatory capital. They are also used in the setting of
risk limits, portfolio management and product pricing.
Retail credit portfolio
Credit scoring is the primary risk rating system for assessing obligor and transaction risk for
retail exposures. Credit scoring is employed in the acquisition of new clients (acquisition
scoring) and portfolio management of existing clients (behavioural scoring).
Acquisition scoring models, which are used for underwriting purposes, utilize established
statistical methods of analyzing new applicant characteristics and past performance to estimate
future credit performance. In model development, all accessible sources of data are used and
include information obtained from the client (employment status), data from our own systems (loan information) and information from external
sources (credit bureaus).
Behavioural scoring is used in the ongoing management of retail clients with whom we have an
established relationship. It utilizes statistical techniques that capture past performance to
predict future behaviour and incorporate information such as cash flow and borrowing trends, as well
as the extent of our relationship with the client. The behavioural risk score is dynamic and is
generally updated on a monthly basis to continually re-evaluate the risk. Characteristics used in
behavioural scoring models are based on information from existing accounts and lending products for
each client, and from information obtained from external sources, such as credit bureaus.
For overall portfolio management, retail exposures are assessed on a pooled basis, with each
pool consisting of exposures that possess similar homogeneous characteristics. Pooling of exposures
allows for more precise and consistent estimates of default and loss characteristics. Criteria used
to pool exposures for risk quantification include behavioural score product type (mortgage, credit
cards, lines of credit and installment loans), collateral type (chattel, liquid assets and real
estate) and the delinquency status (performing, delinquent and default) of the exposure. Regular
monitoring and periodic adjustments and alignments are conducted to ensure that this process
provides for a meaningful differentiation of risk. It also allows the grouping of homogeneous
exposures from a risk perspective and permits accurate and consistent estimation of loss
characteristics at the pool level. Migration between the pools is considered when assessing credit
quality.
The pools are assessed in two dimensions: PD and LGD. The estimation of PD and EAD considers
both borrower and transaction characteristics, including behavioural credit score, product type and
delinquency status. The LGD is estimated based on transaction specified factors, including product
and collateral types. Our risk ratings are reviewed and updated on a regular basis.
The following table maps PD ranges to various risk levels:
Internal ratings map
Table 47
PD bands
Description
0.0%—1.0%
Low Risk
1.1%—6.4%
Medium Risk
6.5%—99.99%
High Risk
100.00%
Impaired/Default
Validation
We ensure that our credit risk rating systems and methodologies are subject to independent
validation on a regular basis. The validation processes provide confirmation that our systems
properly identify factors that help discriminate risk, appropriately quantify risk, produce
measures of risk that respond to changes in the macroeconomic and credit environments, and are
consistent with regulatory requirements and our ratings philosophy. Those responsible for
performing validation activities are functionally separate from the group whose methodologies and
processes are subject to validation.
We ensure that there is proper separation of responsibility between (i) transaction
origination and approval which takes place within the business segments, and (ii) design,
development and maintenance of the risk rating methodologies, which takes place within GRM. GRM is
also responsible for estimating the three risk parameters as described above. To ensure there is a
proper segregation of responsibilities, models developed within the business segments are approved
by GRM.
Royal Bank of Canada: Annual Report 2007
Management’s Discussion and Analysis 85
The validation of risk parameter estimation for both wholesale and retail portfolios
addresses the estimation process and the reasonableness of the estimates used for the
calculation of regulatory capital. The following items are examined and assessed:
•
Quantification methodologies and processes, as well as the
reasonableness of outputs
•
Relationship between historical experience and internally derived
parameter values that incorporate estimators’ expert judgment and
external benchmarking
•
Sufficiency of data observations, the appropriateness of data sources
and data segmentation
•
Statistical significance and predictive power of the estimated values.
Levels of tolerance are defined and mapped against actual results, with
deviations explicitly noted.
A combination of quantitative (statistical) and qualitative (non-statistical) validation methods is employed to ensure that our credit risk rating system is valid. At a minimum, we adopt the
following techniques intended to ensure that the validation process:
•
Examines relevant and material data available from internal and
external sources, to establish a context for assumptions, calculations
and outputs
•
Demonstrates that estimates are grounded in historical experience
•
Provides reasonable predictors of future default and loss.
Detailed validation reports are produced for the assessment of risk rating methodology and risk
parameter estimation.
Economic Capital
Economic Capital is management’s estimate of the amount of equity required to underpin our risks.
It is used in risk-based pricing decisions and profitability measurement to ensure an appropriate
risk and return balance. Within our wholesale credit portfolio, it is also used in setting
single-name and industry limits in order to manage concentration risk. For further details, refer
to the Capital management section.
Sensitivity and stress testing
Sensitivity and stress tests are used to determine the size of potential losses related to various
scenarios for the wholesale and retail credit portfolios. While unexpected losses are, by nature
difficult to quantify, we use stress testing, scenario and sensitivity analysis to better understand
and mitigate unexpected credit losses. These activities serve to alert management to unlikely but
possible adverse market events and economy-wide developments and implications on overall capital
adequacy. Scenarios for credit risk such as economic or industry downturns, are chosen on the basis
of being meaningful, representative of realistic potential events or circumstances, and reasonably
conservative.
Risk control
Our enterprise-wide credit risk policies are developed, communicated and maintained by GRM. These
policies set out the minimum requirements for the prudent management of credit risk in a variety of
transactional and portfolio management contexts.
Credit risk policies
Our credit risk policies have evolved over many years as the organization has grown in geographic
scope and product complexity, and have been refined based on
experience, regulatory influences and
innovations in risk management and are managed under six major categories as follows:
•
Credit Risk Assessment includes policies related to credit risk analysis, risk rating, risk scoring and trading credit
•
Credit Risk Mitigation includes credit structuring, collateral and guarantees
•
Credit Risk Approval includes credit risk limits and exceptions
•
Credit Documentation focuses on documentation and administration
•
Credit Review and Deterioration includes monitoring and review
•
Credit Portfolio Management includes portfolio management and
risk quantification.
Approval of credit products and services
Our products and services are subject to robust risk
review and approval processes. New or amended products and services must be reviewed relative to
all risk types, including credit risk, in our Risk Pyramid, and as the level of risk increases, a
more senior level of approval is required.
Credit risk limits
Limits are
used to ensure our portfolio is well diversified and within our risk appetite as approved
by the Board of Directors. Our credit limits are established at the following levels to ensure
adequate diversification and to reduce concentration risk:
•
Single-name limits
•
Underwriting risk
•
Geographic (county and region) limits
•
Industry sector limits
•
Product and portfolio limits.
The Economic Capital limit is intended to work as a complement to the notional limits and, as such,
single names must satisfy both limits. To ensure single-name credit risk exposure remains well
under regulatory thresholds, and concentration risk is prudently managed, we have established (i)
internal single-name credit risk exposure limits as a percentage of total capital, which are lower
than that required by the OSFI, and (ii) a broader and more
conservative definition of single-name
credit risk exposure than that used by the OSFI. These controls
provide a significant buffer between
our exposure tolerances and those of our regulators. Exceptions are monitored by GRM and reported
to the CRO, with requisite reporting to the CR&RPC in accordance with its mandate.
Credit risk mitigation
We seek to mitigate our exposure to credit risk through a variety of means, including structuring
of transactions, collateral and credit derivatives. The policies and processes that are in place
regarding the monitoring of the effectiveness of our credit risk mitigation are discussed below.
Structuring of transactions
Proper structuring of a credit facility is a key factor in mitigating risk at the transaction level
and often includes the use of guarantees, security, seniority and covenants. We use credit policies
and procedures to set out requirements for structuring transactions.
Product-specific guidelines set
out appropriate product structuring and client criteria.
Collateral
We generally require obligors to pledge collateral as security when we advance credit. This
provides some protection in case of default. Real estate, liquid assets, cash, bonds and government
securities are examples of the collateral securities we accept. The extent of risk mitigation
provided by collateral depends on the amount type and quality of the
collateral taken. Specific
requirements relating to collateral valuation and management are documented in our credit risk
management policies. GRM manages collateral positions through a system, which maintains information
according to counterparty. Valuations of collateral are based on various sources and are compared
to our collateral positions.
Royal Bank of Canada: Annual Report 2007
86 Management’s Discussion and Analysis
We also mitigate risk through credit derivatives that serve to transfer
the risk to a third party. These derivatives are also used as a tool to
mitigate industry sector concentration and single name exposure.
Procedures are in place to ensure these hedges are efficient and
effective.
All derivative transactions supported by collateral are documented using industry-standard
master agreements. Internal policies have been developed for each jurisdiction in order to ensure
the legal enforceability of the collateral arrangements. Cash and securities held as collateral are
held by us or by our authorized custodian. Concentration within the collateral taken is minimal.
Credit valuation adjustments are made for derivative transactions which are exposed to changes
in counterparty credit quality. Credit valuation adjustments are calculated at least once a month
using internal models and GRM-approved methodology, which consist of sophisticated mathematical
algorithms. The reasonableness of the level of valuation adjustments
is independently verified on a
monthly basis.
Netting is a technique that can reduce credit exposure from derivatives and is generally
facilitated through the use of master netting agreements. A master netting agreement provides for a
single net settlement for all financial instruments covered by the agreement in the event of default
on, or termination of, any one contract with the
counterparty. Our trading units provide GRM with all relevant details of outstanding transactions,
including itemized mark-to-market data. This data is used to monitor
the amount of netting benefit
recognized. For further details, refer to Note 7 to our Consolidated Financial Statements.
Reporting
GRM provides a number of enterprise level credit risk reports to senior management and the Board of
Directors so as to ensure that shifts in our credit risk exposure or negative trends in our credit
profile are highlighted and appropriate actions can be taken where necessary.
An Enterprise Risk Report is distributed to the Board of Directors, Group Risk Committee and
senior executives on a quarterly basis. The report provides a dynamic
overview of our risk profile,
including trending information and significant risk issues. It also
includes analysis of significant
shifts in exposures, expected loss, Economic Capital and risk ratings. Large exposure subject to
credit policy exceptions, as well as significant counterparty exposure and downgrades are also
reported. Analysis is provided on a portfolio and industry basis and includes the results of stress
testing and sensitivity analysis.
Separate
business specific reports are also provided to senior management, who monitor the
credit quality of their respective portfolios and emerging industry or market trends.
Loans and acceptances by portfolio and industry
Table 48
(C$ millions)
2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
Residential mortgages
$
109,745
$
96,675
$
91,043
$
81,998
$
75,790
Personal
48,743
44,902
41,045
36,848
32,186
Credit cards
8,322
7,155
6,200
6,456
4,816
Small business (1)
2,652
2,318
1,951
1,928
1,335
Retail
$
169,462
$
151,050
$
140,239
$
127,230
$
114,127
Business (2)
Agriculture
5,367
5,435
5,238
4,992
4,789
Automotive
3,285
2,958
2,545
2,370
2,346
Consumer goods
5,206
4,553
4,437
4,566
4,920
Energy
7,632
6,010
5,628
3,462
3,621
Non-bank financial services
4,245
2,588
1,892
935
1,120
Forest products
1,349
1,126
1,210
1,150
1,523
Industrial products
4,119
3,659
3,157
2,827
2,952
Mining and metals
2,301
1,072
543
511
987
Real estate and related
19,187
16,145
13,730
12,224
12,286
Technology and media
2,423
2,326
2,244
2,135
2,723
Transportation and environment
2,656
2,400
1,900
2,555
3,196
Other
17,583
15,586
14,772
12,319
11,894
Sovereign (3)
932
887
550
800
732
Bank
5,468
3,252
903
668
1,176
Wholesale
$
81,753
$
67,997
$
58,749
$
51,514
$
54,265
Total loans and acceptances
$
251,215
$
219,047
$
198,988
$
178,744
$
168,392
Total allowance for loan losses
$
(1,493
)
$
(1,409
)
$
(1,498
)
$
(1,644
)
$
(2,055
)
Total loans and acceptances, net of allowance for loan losses
$
249,722
$
217,638
$
197,490
$
177,100
$
166,337
(1)
Includes small business exposure managed on a pooled basis.
(2)
Includes small business exposure managed on an individual client basis.
(3)
Sovereign refers to all central governments and agencies, central banks, as well as other
qualifying public sector entities and multilateral development banks.
Credit portfolio analysis
2007 vs. 2006
During
2007, our credit portfolio remained well diversified and continued to show strong growth.
Total loans and acceptances increased $32 billion, or 15%,
compared to the prior year, reflecting
continued growth in both our retail and wholesale loan portfolios.
Retail credit portfolio
Retail loans increased $18 billion, or 12%, from a year ago, largely due
to solid growth across all categories in our Canadian loan portfolio.
Residential mortgages were up $13 billion, or 14%, despite the offsetting effect of $13
billion of securitization during the year. The increase was supported by continued solid housing
market activities in Canada, relatively low interest rates in a historical context, and strong
labour market conditions.
Personal
loans grew $4 billion, or 9%, primarily reflecting strong growth in home equity
lending in Canada, driven by continued solid housing market activities and favourable labour market
conditions.
Credit
cards increased $1 billion, or 16%, reflecting successful sales efforts and continued
consumer spending.
Royal Bank of Canada: Annual Report 2007
Management’s Discussion and Analysis 87
Wholesale
loans and acceptances were up $14 billion, or 20%, primarily reflecting strong growth
across various sectors, with the largest increase in the Real estate and related, Bank and Energy
sectors. Our Real estate and related exposure increased $3 billion, largely attributable to
continued strong property development activities in Canada. Our exposure to the Bank sector was up
$2 billion, with widespread increases across Canada, the U.S. and Other International. Our exposure
to the Energy sector increased $2 billion, primarily reflecting continued investments by companies
related to electricity generation, as well as oil and gas exploration and production in Canada.
Our
portfolio remained well diversified and the overall mix did not
change significantly from the
prior year. The portfolio remained well balanced with residential mortgages comprising 44%,
wholesale loans 33%, personal loans 19%, credit cards 3% and small business managed on a pooled
basis 1%.
The portfolio grew across all geographic regions. The largest increase was in Canada, with
broad-based growth across both our retail and wholesale loan portfolios on generally favourable
economic conditions. Growth in business lending accounted for most of the increase in the U.S. and
Other International. For further details, refer to Table 59 in the
Additional financial information
section.
Five-year trend
Over the last five years, total loans and acceptances continued to grow. Compared to 2003, our
portfolio increased $83 billion, or 49%, driven by growth in both our retail and wholesale loan
portfolios.
Retail
loans grew $55 billion, or 48%, since 2003, largely reflecting strong growth in Canada
across all categories, particularly residential mortgages and personal loans, notwithstanding
mortgage and credit card securitizations over the period. This growth
reflected our continued focus
on expanding our retail portfolios, underpinned by continued solid Canadian housing market
activities, relatively low interest rates and strong labour market conditions.
Our wholesale portfolio grew $27 billion, or 51%, since 2003. The largest growth sectors were
Real estate and related, Bank, Energy and Non-bank financial services, primarily driven by strong
loan demand in Canada amid generally favourable economic conditions over the period. The increase
in Real estate and related exposure over the period was largely due to relatively strong North
American housing markets combined with our U.S. acquisitions. While the U.S. housing market had
been relatively solid over the past few years, it slowed down significantly in the latter part of
2007, which tempered loan growth. Our exposure to the Energy sector increased $4 billion, largely
attributable to increased investments by companies related to oil and gas exploration and
production in Canada and the U.S.
Our portfolio in Canada continued to grow over the period, underpinned by our extensive
distribution capabilities and continued product enhancement on the back of solid loan demand and
generally favourable economic conditions. Our exposure in the U.S. and Other International
generally trended downward except for the last three years, partly
reflecting our strategic
reduction in exposure to risk sensitive sectors, a reduction in single-name concentrations and our
exit from non-core client relationships. With our successful strategic realignment in these areas,
our exposure in the U.S. and Other International increased since
2005, primarily reflecting our
successful market expansion initiatives, including acquisitions.
Credit derivatives position (notional amounts) (1)
Table 49
2007
2006
Protection
Protection
Protection
Protection
(C$ millions)
purchased (2)
sold (2)
purchased (2)
sold (2)
Portfolio management
Business
Automotive
$
379
$
—
$
272
$
5
Consumer goods
—
67
—
92
Energy
957
—
273
7
Non-bank financial services
1,161
—
441
—
Industrial products
—
—
—
35
Mining and metals
591
—
95
—
Real estate and related
413
—
—
—
Technology and media
10
—
6
11
Transportation and environment
335
—
177
—
Other
472
119
520
142
Sovereign (3)
220
—
—
—
Bank
731
—
22
—
Total portfolio management
$
5,269
$
186
$
1,806
$
292
(1)
Comprises credit default swaps, total return swaps and credit default baskets.
(2)
Net of offsetting protection purchased and sold in the amount of $261 million (2006 — $312 million).
(3)
Sovereign refers to all central governments and agencies, central banks, as well as other
qualifying public sector entities and multilateral development banks.
Royal Bank of Canada: Annual Report 2007
88 Management’s Discussion and Analysis
Total credit derivatives protection purchased increased $3 billion from the prior year. The credit
protection bought was mainly related to the Non-bank financial services, Bank, Energy, and Mining
and metals sectors, largely reflecting the acquisition of credit protection to mitigate single-name
concentration risks in our portfolio. Our credit protection sold was down $106 million, or 36%,
from a year ago. The decrease was mainly related to Industrial products, Consumer goods, and
Technology and media sectors largely reflecting unfavourable U.S. financial market conditions.
Gross impaired loans and Allowance for credit losses
Loans are
generally classified as impaired when
there is no longer reasonable assurance of timely collection of the full amount of principal or
interest.
The
allowance for credit losses is maintained at a level that management believes is sufficient
to absorb probable losses in both the on- and off-balance sheet portfolios. The allowance is
evaluated on a quarterly basis based on our assessment of problem accounts, recent loss experience
and changes in other factors, including the composition and quality of the portfolio and economic
conditions. The allowance is increased by the provision for credit losses (which is charged to
income) and decreased by the amount of write-offs net of recoveries. For further information, refer
to the Critical accounting policies and estimates section and Note 1 to our Consolidated Financial
Statements.
Gross impaired loans continuity
Table 50
2007 vs. 2006
(C$ millions, except percentage amounts)
2007
2006
Increase (decrease)
Gross impaired loans, beginning of year
Retail
$
383
$
340
$
43
13
%
Wholesale
451
434
17
4
$
834
$
774
$
60
8
%
New impaired loans
Retail
$
926
$
810
$
116
14
%
Wholesale
720
271
491
181
$
1,646
$
1,081
$
607
56
%
Repayment, return to performing status, sold and other
Retail
$
(132
)
$
(144
)
$
12
8
%
Wholesale
(340
)
(164
)
(218
)
(133
)
$
(472
)
$
(308
)
$
(206
)
(67
)%
Net impaired loan formations
Retail
$
794
$
666
$
128
19
%
Wholesale
380
107
273
255
$
1,174
$
773
$
401
52
%
Write-offs
Retail
$
(759
)
$
(623
)
$
(136
)
(22
)%
Wholesale
(109
)
(90
)
(19
)
(21
)
$
(868
)
$
(713
)
$
(155
)
(22
)%
Gross impaired loans, end of year
Retail
$
418
$
383
$
35
9
%
Wholesale
722
451
271
60
Total gross impaired loans
$
1,140
$
834
$
306
37
%
Key ratios
Gross impaired loans as a % of loans and
acceptances
.45
%
.38
%
n.m.
7 bps
Total net write-offs as a % of average net loans
and acceptances
.30
%
.25
%
n.m.
5 bps
n.m.
not meaningful
Allowance for credit losses continuity
Table 51
2007 vs. 2006
(C$ millions, except percentage amounts)
2007
2006
Increase (decrease)
Specific allowance
Balance, beginning of year
$
263
$
282
$
(19
)
(7
)%
Provision for credit losses
782
482
300
62
Write-offs
(868
)
(713
)
(155
)
(22
)
Recoveries
170
205
(35
)
(17
)
Adjustments
4
7
(3
)
(43
)
Specific allowance for credit losses, end of year
$
351
$
263
$
88
33
%
General allowance
Balance, beginning of year
$
1,223
$
1,286
$
(63
)
(5
)%
Provision for credit losses
9
(53
)
62
117
Adjustments
(11
)
(10
)
(1
)
(10
)
General allowance for credit losses, end of year
$
1,221
$
1,223
$
(2
)
—
Allowance for credit losses
$
1,572
$
1,486
$
86
6
%
Royal Bank of Canada: Annual Report 2007
Management’s Discussion and Analysis 89
Total gross impaired loans (GIL) increased $306 million, or 37%, compared to the prior year,
primarily reflecting higher impaired loans in our U.S. residential builder finance business
triggered by the downturn in the U.S. housing market.
Retail gross impaired loans increased $35 million, or 9%, from a year ago. The increase mainly
reflected higher impairment in both U.S. and Canadian residential mortgages and small business
loans commensurate with portfolio growth in Canada, partially offset by lower impaired Canadian
personal loans.
Wholesale gross impaired loans increased $271 million, or 60%, compared to the prior year. The
increase was largely attributable to the Real estate and related sector, primarily reflecting
higher impaired loans in our U.S. residential builder finance business as a result of the
downturn in the U.S. housing market. This was partially offset by lower impaired loans in the
Technology and media sector mainly due to the favourable resolution of a particular impaired loan.
Gross
impaired loans as a percentage of loans and acceptances were .45% compared to .38% in the
prior year, primarily reflecting higher impaired loans in our U.S. residential builder finance
business. For further details, refer to Table 60 in the Additional financial information section.
Allowance for credit losses
Total allowance for credit losses increased $86 million, or 6%, from a year ago, primarily
reflecting increased specific allowance related to a weakening in credit quality of our U.S.
residential builder finance loan portfolio.
The specific allowance increased $88 million, or 33%, from the prior year. The increase was
mainly driven by higher impaired loans in our U.S. residential builder finance business,
primarily reflecting the downturn in the U.S. housing market.
The general allowance remained relatively stable compared to the prior year, as an increase in
allowance mainly related to our U.S. residential builder finance loan portfolio was offset by
the impact of a stronger Canadian dollar on the translated value of our U.S. dollar-denominated
allowance.
*
GIL ratio: GIL as a percentage of loans and acceptances.
Five-year trend
Gross impaired loans
Gross impaired loans trended downward from 2003 to 2006, and decreased $911 million, or 52%,
primarily reflecting lower impairment in our wholesale loan portfolio. In 2007, gross impaired
loans increased $306 million, or 37%, from the prior year, largely due to higher impaired loans in
our U.S. residential builder finance business as a result of the downturn in the U.S. housing
market.
Retail gross impaired loans remained relatively stable over the period. The increase in gross
impaired loans in both U.S. and Canadian residential mortgages, primarily due to portfolio growth,
was largely offset by a decrease in impairment in our Canadian personal loan portfolio over the
period.
Wholesale gross impaired loans generally trended downward from 2003 to 2006, and decreased
$613 million, or 46%. The decline was across all geographic areas and most industry sectors, with
the largest decrease in the Energy, Forest products, Transportation and environment, and
Agriculture sectors due to generally favourable economic conditions over the period. In 2007,
wholesale gross impaired loans increased significantly, largely reflecting higher impairment in our
U.S. residential builder finance business triggered by the downturn in the U.S. housing
market.
The ratio of gross impaired loans as a percentage of loans and acceptances declined
significantly from 1.04% in 2003 to .38% in 2006, and increased to .45% in 2007, reflecting the
factors discussed above. For further details, refer to Table 60 in the Additional financial
information section.
Allowance for credit losses
Over the last five years, total allowance for credit losses of $1,572 million in 2007, decreased
$592 million, or 27%, from 2003, primarily reflecting a reduction in specific allowance.
The specific allowance of $351 million in 2007 was down $406 million, or 54%, compared to
2003. For the period 2003 to 2006, the wholesale loan portfolio recorded the largest reduction in
specific allowance, and was broad-based across portfolios, industry sectors and geographic regions.
In 2007, specific allowance increased largely resulting from a weakening in credit quality of our
U.S. residential builder finance loan portfolio driven by the downturn in the U.S. housing
market.
The general allowance of $1,221 million in 2007 decreased $186 million, or 13%, compared to
2003. The decrease was largely due to the reversal of general allowance of $175 million and $50
million in 2004 and 2006, respectively, largely reflecting improved credit quality and economic
conditions in those years.
Royal Bank of Canada: Annual Report 2007
90 Management’s Discussion and Analysis
The provision for credit losses is charged to income by an amount necessary to bring the allowance
for credit losses to a level determined appropriate by management, as discussed in the Critical
accounting policies and estimates section and Note 1 to our Consolidated Financial Statements.
Provision for (recovery of) credit losses
Table 52
2007 vs. 2006
(C$ millions, except percentage amounts)
2007
2006
Increase (decrease)
Residential mortgages
$
13
$
6
$
7
117
%
Personal
364
306
58
19
Credit cards
223
163
60
37
Small business (1)
34
29
5
17
Retail
$
634
$
504
$
130
26
%
Business (2)
$
148
$
(22
)
$
170
n.m.
Sovereign (3)
—
—
—
—
Bank
—
—
—
—
Wholesale
$
148
$
(22
)
$
170
n.m.
Total specific provision for loan losses
$
782
$
482
$
300
62
%
Total general provision
$
9
$
(53
)
$
62
117
%
Total provision for credit losses
$
791
$
429
$
362
84
%
Specific PCL as a % of average net loans and acceptances
.33
%
.23
%
n.m.
10 bps
(1)
Includes small business exposure managed on a pooled basis.
(2)
Includes small business exposure managed on an individual client basis.
(3)
Sovereign refers to all central governments and agencies, central banks, as well
as other qualifying public sector entities and multilateral development banks.
n.m.
not meaningful
2007 vs. 2006
Total provision for credit losses (PCL) increased $362 million, or 84%, compared to the prior year,
which had been at a cyclically low level, and has trended up towards the historical average. The
increase reflected higher provisions for both our wholesale and retail loan portfolios, primarily
reflecting portfolio growth and higher impaired loans in our U.S. residential builder finance
business triggered by the downturn in the U.S. housing market. Specific PCL as a percentage of
average net loans and acceptances increased from a year ago, largely reflecting higher impaired
loans in our U.S. residential builder finance business.
Specific PCL for retail loans was up $130 million, or 26%, from a year ago. The increase was
primarily attributable to higher provisions in our credit cards and personal unsecured credit line
portfolios, largely reflecting higher loss rates and portfolio growth.
Specific PCL for wholesale loans increased $170 million over the prior year. The increase was
largely attributable to our business portfolio mainly due to higher impaired loans in our U.S.
residential builder finance business and higher write-offs in Canada. Lower recoveries in our
corporate loan portfolio this year also contributed to the increase in provisions.
The general provision increased $62 million from a year ago, primarily reflecting a $50
million reversal of the general allowance related to our corporate loan portfolio in the prior
year. Higher provisions in our U.S. residential builder finance loan portfolio, largely
reflecting a weakening in credit quality as a result of the downturn in the U.S. housing market,
also contributed to the increase.
*
PCL ratio: Specific PCL as a percentage of average net loans and acceptances.
Five-year trend
During the period 2003 to 2005, specific provision for credit losses generally trended downward,
primarily reflecting a reduction in provisions for our business loan portfolio. We recorded
significant recoveries particularly in corporate loans in 2005 and 2006. In 2007, specific
provisions has trended up towards the historical average, mainly reflecting higher provisions for
our business loan portfolio, largely due to increased impaired loans in our U.S. residential
builder finance business, portfolio growth and higher write-offs in Canada. Higher provisions in
our personal loan and credit cards portfolios due to higher loss rates and portfolio growth also
contributed to the increase. The specific provision as a percentage of average net loans and
acceptances broadly declined from 2003 to 2006, largely due to a reduction in provisions for our
business loan portfolio. The ratio increased to .33% in 2007, primarily reflecting higher impaired
loans in our U.S. residential builder finance business. For further details, refer to Table 61
in the Additional financial information section.
Royal Bank of Canada: Annual Report 2007
Management’s Discussion and Analysis 91
Market risk is the risk of loss that may arise from changes in market factors such as
interest rates, foreign exchange rates, equity or commodity prices, and credit spreads. We are
exposed to market risk in our trading activity and our asset/liability management activities. The
level of market risk to which we are exposed varies depending on market conditions, expectations of
future price and yield movements and the composition of our trading portfolio.
Trading market risk
Trading market risk encompasses various risks associated with cash and related derivative products
that are traded in interest rate, foreign exchange, equity, credit and commodity markets. Trading
market risk is comprised of the following components:
•
Interest rate risk is the potential adverse impact on our earnings and economic value due to
changes in interest rates. It is composed of: (i) directional risk — arising from parallel
shifts in the yield curve, (ii) yield curve risk — arising from non-uniform rate changes
across a spectrum of maturities, (iii) basis risk — resulting from an imperfect hedge of one
instrument type by another instrument type whose changes in price are not perfectly
correlated, and (iv) option risks — from changes in the value of embedded options due to
changes in prices or rates and their volatility. Most financial instruments have exposure to
interest rate risk.
•
Foreign exchange rate risk is the potential adverse impact on our earnings and economic value
due to currency rate and precious metals price movements and volatilities. In our proprietary
positions, we are exposed to the spot, forward and derivative markets.
•
Equity risk is the potential adverse impact on our earnings due to movements in individual
equity prices or general movements in the level of the stock market. We are exposed to equity
risk from the buying and selling of equities and indices as principal in conjunction with our
investment banking activities and from our trading activities, which include tailored equity
derivative products, arbitrage trading and relative value trading.
•
Commodities risk is the potential adverse impact on our earnings and economic value due to
commodities price movements and volatilities. Principal commodities traded include crude oil,
heating oil and natural gas. In our proprietary positions, we are exposed to the spot,
forwards and derivative markets.
•
Credit spread risk is the general adverse impact on our earnings and economic value due to
changes in the credit spreads associated with our holdings of instruments subject to credit
risk.
•
Credit specific risk is the potential adverse impact on our earnings and economic value due
to changes in the creditworthiness and default of issuers on our holdings in bonds and money
market instruments, and those underlying credit derivatives.
We conduct trading activities over-the-counter and on exchanges in the spot, forward, futures and
options markets, and we offer structured derivative transactions. Market risks associated with
trading activities are a result of market-making, positioning, and sales and arbitrage activities
in the interest rate, foreign exchange, equity, commodities, and credit markets. Our trading
operations primarily acts as a market maker, executing transactions that meet the financial
requirements of our clients and transferring the market risks to the broad financial market. We
also act as principal and take proprietary market risk positions within the authorized limits
granted by the Board of Directors. The trading book consists of cash and derivative positions that
are held for short-term resale, taken on with the intent of benefiting in the short-term from
actual or expected differences between their buying and selling prices or to lock in arbitrage
profits.
Responsibilities
Oversight of market risk is provided by the Board of Directors through the Conduct Review & Risk
Policy Committee (CR&RPC). Market risk limit approval authorities are established by the Board of
Directors, upon recommendation of the CR&RPC, and delegated to senior management.
The independent oversight of trading market risk management activities is the responsibility
of Group Risk Management (GRM) — Market and Trading Credit Risk, which includes major units in
Toronto, London, New York and Sydney. The Market and Trading Credit Risk group establishes market
risk policies and limits, develops quantitative techniques and analytical tools, vets trading
models and systems, maintains the Value-at-Risk (VaR) and stress risk measurement systems, and
provides enterprise risk reporting on trading activities. This group also provides independent
oversight on trading activities, including the establishment and administration of trading
operational limits, market risk and counterparty credit limit compliance, risk analytics, and the
review and oversight of non-traditional or complex transactions.
Business segments are accountable for their market risks, working in partnership with GRM to
ensure the alignment between risk appetite and business strategies.
GRM — Market and Trading Credit Risk is responsible for the determination and reporting of
regulatory and Economic Capital requirements for market risk, and provides assurance to regulators
in regular filings on reporting accuracy, timeliness and the proper functioning of statistical
models within the approved confidence level.
Risk measurement
We employ risk measurement tools such as VaR, sensitivity analysis and stress testing. GRM uses
these measures in assessing global risk-return trends and to alert senior management to adverse
trends or positions.
The majority of trading positions in foreign exchange, interest rate, equity, commodity and
credit trading have capital calculated under an internal models approach while structured credit
derivatives are calculated under the Standardized Approach. Also calculated under the Standardized
Approach for migration and default (specific) risk are a limited set of interest rate products.
These products and risks are not included in our global VaR.
Value-at-Risk (VaR)
VaR is a statistical technique that measures the worst-case loss expected over the period within a
99% confidence level. Larger losses are possible, but with low probability. For example, based on a
99% confidence interval, a portfolio with a VaR of $20 million held over one day would have a one
in one hundred chance of suffering a loss greater than $20 million in that day. VaR is measured
over a 10-day horizon for the purpose of determining regulatory capital requirements.
We measure VaR by major risk category on a discrete basis. We also measure and monitor the
effects of correlation in the movements of interest rates, credit spreads, exchange rates, equity
and commodity prices and highlight the benefit of diversification within our trading portfolio.
This is then quantified in the diversification effect shown in our Global VaR table on the
following page.
As with any modeled risk measure, there are certain limitations that arise from the
assumptions used in VaR. Historical VaR assumes that the future will behave like the past. As a
result, historical scenarios may not reflect the next market cycle. Furthermore, the use of a
10-day horizon VaR for risk measurement implies that positions could be unwound or hedged within 10
days but this may not be a realistic assumption if the market becomes largely or completely
illiquid. For example, this was observed for certain U.S. subprime-related securities since August
2007. VaR is calculated based on end-of-day positions.
Validation
To ensure VaR effectively captures our market risk, we continuously monitor and enhance our
methodology. Daily back-testing serves to compare hypothetical profit or loss against the VaR to
monitor the statistical validity of 99% confidence level of the daily VaR measure.
Royal Bank of Canada: Annual Report 2007
92 Management’s Discussion and Analysis
Back-testing is calculated by holding position levels constant and isolating the effect of the
movement of actual market rates over the next day and over the next 10 days on the market value of
the portfolios. Intra-day position changes account for most of the difference between theoretical
back-testing and actual profit and loss. VaR models and market risk factors are independently
reviewed periodically to further ensure accuracy and reliability. In 2007, there were five
occurrences of a back-test exceeding VaR. This occurred during the volatile markets of July and
August. VaR calculated using a historical window can lead to
back-testing breaches when the historical
window used in the calculation is less volatile than current markets. During this period, we
frequently updated our scenarios to keep pace with current market events.
Sensitivity analysis and stress testing
Sensitivity analysis is used to measure the impact of small changes in individual risk factors such
as interest rates and foreign exchange rates and is designed to isolate and quantify exposure to
the underlying risk.
VaR is a risk measure that is only meaningful in normal market conditions. To
address more extreme market events, stress testing is used to measure and alert senior management
to our exposure to potential political, economic or other disruptive events. We run several types
of stress testing, including historical stress events such as the 1987 stock market crash, as well
as hypothetical “what-if” stress events that represent potential future events that are plausible
but have a very low probability of occurring. Our stress scenarios are reviewed and updated as
required to reflect relevant events and hypothetical situations. While we endeavour to be
conservative in our stress testing, there can be no assurance that our stress testing assumptions
will cover every market scenario that may unfold.
Risk control
Policies
A comprehensive risk policy framework governs trading-related risks and activities and provides
guidance to trading management, middle office compliance functions and operations. We employ an
extensive set of principles, rules, controls and limits, which conform to industry best practice.
Our market risk management framework is designed to ensure that our risks are appropriately
diversified on a global basis. Limits on measures such as notional size, term and overall risk are
monitored at the desk, and at the portfolio and business levels.
Reporting
Reports on trading risks are provided by GRM — Market and Trading Credit Risk to the Chief Risk
Officer (CRO) and the operating committee of Capital Markets on a weekly basis and to senior
management on a daily basis. Enterprise-wide reporting is used to monitor compliance against VaR
and stress limits approved by the Board of Directors, and the operating limits derived from these
board limits. In addition to this monitoring, GRM — Market and Trading Credit Risk pre-approves
excesses and reports any breach to the CRO and the operating committee of Capital Markets.
Internal reporting to senior management includes stand-alone risk calculations for portfolios
that have standardized regulatory capital which are then combined
with models-based results to
present an aggregated enterprise risk profile.
The following table shows our global VaR for total trading activities under our models based
approach for capital by major risk category and also shows the diversification effect, which is
calculated as the difference between the global VaR and the sum of the separate risk factor VaRs.
Global VAR by major risk category
Table 53
2007
2006
As at
For the year ended October 31
As at
For the year ended October 31
(C$ millions)
Oct. 31
High
Average
Low
Oct. 31
High
Average
Low
Equity
$
8
$
18
$
9
$
4
$
7
$
11
$
7
$
5
Foreign exchange
4
7
2
1
2
4
2
1
Commodities
2
2
1
—
1
2
1
—
Interest rate
20
23
19
14
13
20
13
9
Credit specific
3
5
3
2
3
4
3
2
Diversification
(19
)
n.m.
(13
)
n.m.
(9
)
n.m.
(8
)
n.m.
Global VAR
$
18
$
27
$
21
$
16
$
17
$
25
$
18
$
13
n.m.
not meaningful
Global VaR
2007 vs. 2006
Average global VaR for the year of $21 million was up compared to $18 million a year ago. This
increase largely reflected an increase in both Interest rate and Equity VaR due to a higher level
of trading activity and increased market volatility during the current year. These increases were
mostly offset by an improvement in the overall diversification effect, which rose to 38% compared
to 31% a year ago.
Trading revenue
2007 vs. 2006
The
volatility in daily trading revenue in the latter part of 2007
reflected difficult trading conditions in both interest rates and
credit-related products arising from a very stressed market during
that period. Equity markets also experienced high volatility in July
and August. Writedowns related to the valuation of U.S. subprime RMBS
and CDOs of ABS in our Structured Credit business totalled
$357 million. In addition to this
Royal Bank of Canada: Annual Report 2007
Management’s Discussion and Analysis 93
Traditional non-trading banking activities, such as deposit taking and lending, expose us to market
risk, of which interest rate risk is the largest component.
Our goal is to manage the interest rate risk of the non-trading balance sheet to a target
level. We modify the risk profile of the balance sheet through proactive hedging to achieve our
target level. For additional information regarding the use of derivatives in asset and liability
management, refer to the Off-Balance sheet section and Note 7 to our Consolidated Financial
Statements. We continually monitor the effectiveness of our interest rate risk mitigation activity
within Corporate Treasury on a value and earnings basis.
For a discussion of the management of foreign exchange risk in the non-trading balance sheet,
refer to the Hedging foreign currency-denominated operations discussion in the Capital management
section.
Responsibilities
While our individual subsidiaries and business segments manage the daily activities, Corporate
Treasury is responsible for managing our enterprise-wide interest rate risk, monitoring approved
limits and compliance with policies and operating standards. Our Asset and Liability Committee
(ALCO) provides oversight to Corporate Treasury and reviews the policy developed by Corporate
Treasury and provides recommendations to CR&RPC for approval.
Risk measurement
We endeavour to keep pace with best practices in instrument valuation, econometric modeling and new
hedging techniques on an ongoing basis. Our investigations range from the evaluation of traditional
asset/liability management processes to pro forma application of recent developments in
quantitative methods.
Our risk position is measured daily, weekly or monthly based on the size and complexity of the
portfolio. Measurement of risk is based on rates charged to clients as well as funds transfer
pricing rates. Key rate analysis is utilized as a primary tool for risk management. It provides us
with an assessment of the sensitivity of the exposure of our economic value of equity to
instantaneous changes in individual points on the yield curve.
The economic value of equity is equal to the net present value of our assets, liabilities and
off-balance sheet instruments.
Funds transfer pricing
We use a funds transfer pricing mechanism at the transaction level to transfer interest rate risk
to Corporate Treasury and identify the profitability of various products. The funds transfer
pricing rates are market-based and are aligned with interest rate risk management
principles. They are supported by empirical research into client behaviour and are an integral
input to the retail business pricing decisions.
We also focus on developing retail product valuation models that incorporate the
impact of consumer behaviour. These valuation models are typically derived through econometric
estimation of consumer exercise of options embedded in retail products. The most significant
embedded options are mortgage rate commitments and prepayment options. In addition, we
model the sensitivity of the value of deposits with an indefinite maturity to interest rate
changes.
Validation
We supplement our assessment by measuring interest rate risk for a range of dynamic and static
market scenarios. Dynamic scenarios
simulate our interest income in response to various combinations of business and market factors.
Business factors include assumptions about future pricing strategies and volume and mix of new
business, whereas market factors include assumed changes in interest rate levels and changes in the
shape of the yield curve. Static scenarios supplement dynamic scenarios and are employed for
assessing the risks to the value of equity and net interest income.
As part of our monitoring of the effectiveness of our interest rate risk mitigation activity
within Corporate Treasury which is done on a value and earnings basis, model assumptions are
validated against actual client behaviour.
Risk control
Policies and limits
The interest rate risk policies define the management standards and acceptable limits within which
risks to net interest income over a 12-month horizon, and the economic value of equity, are to be
contained. These ranges are based on immediate and sustained ± 100 basis point parallel shift of
the yield curve. The limit for net interest income risk is 3% of projected net interest income, and
for economic value of equity risk, the limit is 5% of projected common equity. Interest rate risk
policies and limits are reviewed and approved annually by the Board of Directors.
Royal Bank of Canada: Annual Report 2007
94 Management’s Discussion and Analysis
The individual subsidiaries and business segments report the interest rate risk management activity
on a monthly basis. They must also immediately report any exceptions to the interest rate risk
policies to Corporate Treasury and seek approval of the corrective actions.
An Enterprise interest rate risk report is reviewed monthly by the ALCO and quarterly by the
Group Risk Committee and the Board of Directors.
Represents the impact on the non-trading portfolios held in our U.S. banking operations.
2007 Analysis
The above table provides the potential before-tax impact of an immediate and sustained 100 basis
point and 200 basis point increase or decrease in interest rates on net interest income and
economic value of equity of our non-trading portfolio, assuming that no further hedging is
undertaken. These measures are based upon assumptions
made by senior management and validated by empirical research. All interest rate risk measures are
based upon interest rate exposures at a specific time and continuously change as a result of
business activities and our risk management initiatives. Over the course of 2007, our interest rate
risk exposure was well within our target level.
OPERATIONAL RISK
Operational risk is the risk of loss resulting from inadequate or failed internal processes,
people and systems or from external events.
Operational risk is embedded in all our activities, including the practices and controls used
to manage other risks. Failure to manage operational risk can result in direct or indirect
financial loss, reputational impact, regulatory censure, or failure in the management of other
risks such as credit or market risk.
Our operational risk management framework flows directly from our enterprise risk management
framework and sets out the principles and practices that we use to manage operational risk by
identifying, measuring, controlling, and monitoring and reporting it. During 2007, we strengthened
our operational risk management framework by expanding the common operational risk language that
supports the consistent identification, assessment and understanding of risks. We also implemented
our “converged” operational risk and control assessment and monitoring program. This
enterprise-wide program integrated several stand-alone programs to identify and assess operational
risks.
Responsibilities
The Board of Directors is responsible for providing oversight and ensuring that appropriate
policies have been implemented to manage operational risk. The Chief Risk Officer (CRO) and Group
Risk Management (GRM) are responsible for implementing the operational risk management framework on
an enterprise-wide basis, as well as for directing and approving significant area-specific
operational risk policies. A dedicated team within GRM designs and supports operational risk
policies, programs and initiatives, and monitors implementation progress and ongoing execution. The
businesses and corporate support groups are responsible for the informed and active management of
the operational risks within their activities in accordance with the operational risk management
framework. Where appropriate, execution of operational risk management programs is conducted by GTO
on behalf of the businesses and corporate support groups.
Risk measurement
Operational risk is difficult to measure in a complete and precise manner, given that exposure to
operational risk is often implicit, bundled with other risks, or otherwise not taken on
intentionally. In the banking industry, measurement tools and methodologies continue to evolve.
Nonetheless, we are able to gauge our operational risk exposure by using several approaches
concurrently.
Risk assessment
Operational risks are identified and their potential impact assessed through our enterprise-wide
integrated operational risk and control assessment and monitoring program. Our operational risk
management framework is used to ensure consistent identification and assessment of operational
risks and the controls used to manage these.
Risk indicators
Our businesses and corporate support groups use a broad range of risk indicators to manage their
day-to-day activities. GRM uses indicators to monitor operational risk at the enterprise level.
These indicators provide insight into the level and composition of our operational risk exposure
and potential changes in these.
Operational event data collection and analysis
Operational risk events are reported in a central
enterprise database. Comprehensive information about these events is then collected, and includes
information regarding amount, occurrence, discovery date, business area and product involved, root
causes and risk drivers. Analysis of operational risk event data helps us to understand where and
how our risks are manifesting themselves, provides a historical perspective of our operational risk
experience, and establishes a basis for measuring our operational risk exposure and the capital
needed to underpin this type of risk.
Industry loss analysis
We review and analyze information on operational losses that have occurred at other financial
institutions, using published information and information we acquire through our membership in the
Operational Riskdata eXchange (ORX), a private data-sharing
Royal Bank of Canada: Annual Report 2007
Management’s Discussion and Analysis 95
consortium. Both provide insights into the size and nature of potential exposures, which enables us
to benchmark our loss experience against those of our peers to determine if our experience puts us
in an outlier position. It also allows us to monitor emerging developments and trends that affect
the financial industry as a whole.
Risk control
Operational risk is managed through our infrastructure, controls, systems and people, complemented
by central enterprise-wide groups focusing on management of specific operational risks such as
fraud, privacy, outsourcing, and business disruption, as well as people and systems risks.
A number of our enterprise-wide groups ensure that all of these controls and systems are
effective under our operational risk management framework. These include compliance, which ensures
a complete view of our regulatory obligations and provides a co-ordinated, effective response to
these, and the internal audit group, which provides independent assessment of risk management
practices, internal controls and corporate governance processes.
Risk mitigation
Any high-risk exposures that we identify are subject to remedial measures, monitoring and control
testing. This includes exposures identified through our integrated risk and control assessment and
monitoring program, internal audits, compliance reviews, business continuity readiness reviews, or
operational risk event reporting.
Our corporate insurance program enables us to transfer some of our operational risk exposure
by purchasing insurance coverage, the nature and amounts of which are determined on a central,
enterprise-wide basis.
Reporting
GRM provides quarterly enterprise level risk reporting to senior management and the Board of
Directors. The operational risk reporting includes an overview of our operational risk profile and
the trend and outlook for our exposure. Details are provided on areas of elevated risk, individual
operational risks where there is heightened awareness, regulatory or compliance issues, and large
operational risk events. This reporting is supplemented with more detailed specific reporting by
groups such as compliance, audit, legal and human resources.
LIQUIDITY AND FUNDING RISK
Liquidity and funding risk is the risk that an institution is unable to generate or obtain
sufficient cash or its equivalent in a timely and cost-effective manner to meet its commitments as
they come due.
Our liquidity and funding management framework is designed to ensure that adequate sources of
reliable and cost-effective cash or its equivalents are continually available to satisfy our
current and prospective financial commitments under normal and contemplated stress conditions. To
achieve this goal, we are dedicated to the preservation of the following key liquidity and funding
risk mitigation strategies:
•
A large base of core client deposits
•
Continual access to diversified sources of wholesale funding,
including demonstrated capacities to monetize specific asset classes
•
A comprehensive and enterprise-wide liquidity contingency plan
supported by an earmarked pool of unencumbered marketable securities
(referred to as “contingency liquidity assets”) that provide assured
access to cash in a crisis.
Our liquidity and funding management practices and processes reinforce these risk mitigation
strategies by assigning prudential limits or targets to metrics associated with these activities
and regularly measuring and monitoring various sources of liquidity risk under both normal and
stressed market conditions. In managing this risk, we aim to achieve a prudent balance between the
level of risk we take and the cost of its mitigation, recognizing that this balance may need to be
adjusted if our internal and/or external environments change materially.
Responsibilities
The Board of Directors is responsible for oversight of our liquidity and funding management
framework, which is developed and implemented by senior management.
•
The Audit Committee approves our liquidity and funding management
framework, our pledging framework, and liquidity contingency plan and
establishes broad liquidity risk tolerance levels, and the Board of
Directors is informed on a periodic basis about our current and
prospective liquidity condition.
•
The Group Risk Committee and our Asset and Liability Committee (ALCO)
share management oversight responsibility for liquidity and funding
policies and receive regular reports detailing compliance with key
limits and guidelines.
•
Corporate Treasury has global responsibility for the development of
liquidity and funding management policies, strategies
and contingency plans and for recommending and monitoring limits within the framework. In this
role, Corporate Treasury is assisted by Group Risk Management. Corporate Treasury actively
participates in national and international industry initiatives to benchmark and enhance its
liquidity management practices.
•
Treasury departments of business segments and key subsidiaries execute
transactions in line with liquidity management policies and
strategies.
•
Subsidiaries are responsible for managing their own liquidity in
compliance with policies and practices established under advice and
counsel by Corporate Treasury and within governing regulatory
requirements.
Risk measurement
The assessment of our liquidity position reflects management’s conservative estimates, assumptions
and judgments pertaining to current and prospective firm-specific and market conditions and the
related behaviour of our clients and counterparties. We measure and manage our liquidity position
from three risk perspectives as follows:
Structural liquidity risk
Structural liquidity risk management addresses the risk due to mismatches in effective maturities
between assets and liabilities, more specifically the risk of over-reliance on short-term
liabilities to fund longer-term illiquid assets. We use both the cash capital and survival horizon
models to assist in the evaluation of balance sheet liquidity and determination of the appropriate
term structure of our debt financing. These methodologies also allow us to measure and monitor the
relationship between illiquid assets and core funding, including our exposure to a protracted loss
of unsecured wholesale deposits under stressed conditions.
Tactical liquidity risk
Tactical liquidity risk management addresses our normal day-to-day funding requirements, which are
managed by imposing prudential limits on net fund outflows in Canadian dollar and foreign
currencies for key short-term time horizons, as well as on our pledging activities that are subject
to an enterprise-wide framework that assigns a risk-adjusted limit to our aggregate pledging
exposure and individual limits by types of pledging activities. Pledged assets include a pool of
eligible assets that are reserved exclusively to support our participation in payment and
settlement systems.
Royal Bank of Canada: Annual Report 2007
96 Management’s Discussion and Analysis
Contingent liquidity risk management assesses the impact of and our intended responses to sudden
stressful events. The liquidity contingency plan identifies comprehensive action plans that would
be implemented depending on the duration and severity of the various liquidity crises identified in
our stress testing program. Corporate Treasury maintains and administers the liquidity contingency
plan. The Liquidity Crisis Team, consisting of senior representatives of all key business and
functional units, meets regularly to engage in stress testing and to review our liquidity
contingency preparedness.
Our stress testing exercises are based on models that measure our potential exposure to
global, country-specific or RBC-specific events (or a combination thereof) and consider both
historical and hypothetical events. Different levels of severity are considered for each type of
crisis including ratings downgrades of two and four notches and to non-investment grade for
RBC-specific events. These comprehensive tests include elements of scenario and sensitivity stress
testing techniques. In all cases, the crisis impact is measured over a nine-week horizon, which is
also used in our key measure of tactical liquidity risk and is what we consider to be the most
crucial time span for a liquidity event. Liquidity Crisis Team members contribute to assumptions
about the expected behaviour of balance sheet asset and liability categories and off-balance sheet
exposures based on their specialized client, product and market perspectives. Some tests are run
monthly, others are only run annually. Frequency is determined by considering a combination of
their likelihood and impact. After reviewing test results, the liquidity contingency plan and other
related liquidity and funding risk management practices may be modified in light of lessons
learned. Failure to meet predetermined minimum targets in some of these tests, as well as in
aforementioned risk measures, would result in discussion with senior management and, as necessary,
the Board of Directors, and possibly lead to revised limits and targets.
Our liquid assets are primarily a diversified pool of highly rated marketable securities and
include segregated portfolios (in both Canadian and U.S. dollars) of contingency liquidity assets
to address potential on- and off-balance sheet liquidity exposures (such as deposit erosion, loan
drawdowns and higher collateral demands), that have been estimated through models we have developed
or by the scenario analyses and stress tests that we conduct periodically. These port folios are
subject to minimum asset levels and strict eligibility guidelines to ensure ready access to cash in
emergencies.
Risk control
We monitor and manage our liquidity position on a consolidated basis and consider legal,
regulatory, tax, operational and any other applicable restrictions when analyzing our ability to
lend or borrow funds between branches, branches and subsidiaries, and subsidiaries.
Policies
Our principal liquidity and funding policies are reviewed and approved annually by senior
management committees and the Board of Directors. These broad policies establish risk tolerance
parameters and authorize senior management committees or Corporate Treasury to approve more
detailed policies and limits related to specific measures, businesses and products. These policies
and procedures govern management, measurement and reporting requirements and define approved
liquidity and funding limits.
Authorities and limits
Targets for our structural liquidity position, based on both a “cash capital” metric and a
“survivability horizon” measurement, are approved at least annually and monitored regularly.
With respect to net short-term funding requirements, all limits are monitored regularly to
ensure compliance. The prescribed treatment of cash flow assets and liabilities under varying
conditions are
reviewed periodically to determine if they remain valid or changes to assumptions and limits are
required in light of internal and/or external developments. Global market volatility in the latter
part of 2007 has prompted us to modify the liquidity treatment of certain asset classes to reflect
our expectations that market liquidity for these products will be sporadic for some time. Some
limits are in the process of being reviewed and possibly revised to take into consideration the
results of updated stress tests that reflect lessons learned during this period of market
volatility.
Reporting
Detailed reports on our principal short-term asset/liability mismatches are monitored on a daily
basis to ensure compliance with the limits for overall group exposure and by major currency,
branches, subsidiaries and geographic locations. As set out in our liquidity and funding management
framework, any potential exceptions to established limits on net fund outflows or other rules,
whether monitored on a daily, weekly, monthly or quarterly basis, are reported immediately to
Corporate Treasury, which provides or arranges for approval after reviewing a remedial action plan.
Funding
Funding strategy
Diversification of funding sources is a crucial component of our overall liquidity management
strategy. Diversification expands our funding flexibility while minimizing funding concentration
and dependency and generally reducing financing costs. To that effect, we completed the first
Canadian covered bond issuance in November 2007. Maintaining competitive credit ratings is also
critical to cost-effective funding. Core funding, comprising capital, longer-term liabilities and a
diversified pool of personal and, to a lesser extent, commercial deposits, is the foundation of our
strong structural liquidity position.
Credit ratings
Our ability to access unsecured funding markets and to engage in certain collateralized business
activities on a cost-effective basis is primarily dependent upon maintaining competitive credit
ratings. Our credit ratings are largely determined by the quality of our earnings, the adequacy of
our capital and the effectiveness of our risk management programs. We estimate, based on periodic
reviews of ratings triggers embedded in our existing businesses and of our funding capacity
sensitivity, that a minor downgrade would not materially influence our liability composition,
funding access, collateral usage and associated costs. However, a series of downgrades could have
adverse consequences for our funding capacity, collateral requirements and on the results of our
operations.
Credit ratings are not recommendations to purchase, sell or hold a financial
obligation inasmuch as they do not comment on market price or suitability for a particular
investor. Ratings are subject to revision or withdrawal at any time by the rating organization.
During the year, there were two positive developments with respect to our ratings. In the second
quarter of 2007, Moody’s Investors Service upgraded our senior long-term debt rating to Aaa from
Aa2 as a result of refinements made to their joint default analysis, and in the third quarter of
2007, Standard & Poor’s revised our rating outlook to positive from stable, citing among other
points, a sound liquidity profile and a very robust liquidity management infrastructure. Our Fitch
and DBRS
Royal Bank of Canada: Annual Report 2007
Management’s Discussion and Analysis 97
ratings and outlooks remain unchanged from October 31, 2006. Our collective ratings continue to be
the highest categories assigned by the respective agencies to a Canadian bank and these strong
credit ratings support our ability to competitively access unsecured funding markets.
Deposit profile
The composition of our global deposit liabilities is summarized in Note 13 to our Consolidated
Financial Statements. In 2007, personal deposits remained the key source of funding for our
Canadian dollar balance sheet while most foreign currency deposits originated from unsecured,
wholesale sources, including large corporate and institutional clients and foreign commercial and
central banks.
Our personal deposit franchise constitutes the principal source of constant funding while
certain commercial and institutional client groups also maintain relational balances with low
volatility profiles. Taken together, these clients represent a highly stable supply of core
deposits in most conceivable environments as they typically are less responsive to market
developments than transactional lenders and investors due to the impact of deposit insurance and
extensive and, at times, exclusive relationships with us. Core deposits, consisting of our own
statistically derived estimates of the highly stable portions of all of our relational personal,
commercial and institutional balances (demand, notice and fixed-term) together with wholesale funds
maturing beyond one year, increased during the year by about 2% to 56% of our total deposits. We
encourage wholesale funding diversity and regularly review sources of short-term funds to ensure
that they are well-diversified by provider, product, market and geographic origin. In addition, we
maintain an ongoing presence in different funding markets, which allows us to constantly monitor
market developments and trends in order to identify opportunities and risks and to take appropriate
and timely actions.
Term funding sources
Table 56
(C$ millions)
2007
2006
2005
Long-term funding outstanding
$
51,540
$
33,361
$
24,004
Total mortgage-backed
securities sold
14,239
12,186
8,487
Commercial mortgage-backed
securities sold
2,405
1,914
1,237
Credit card receivables
financed
through notes issued by a
securitization special
purpose entity
2,759
2,250
2,500
Our long-term funding sources are managed to minimize cost by limiting concentration by geographic
location, investor segment, instrument, currency and maturity profile. In addition, liquidity
objectives, market conditions, interest rates, credit spreads and desired
financial structure influence our long-term funding activities. We operate debt issuance programs
in Canada, the U.S., Europe, Australia and Japan. Diversification into new markets and untapped
investor segments is also constantly evaluated against relative issuance costs.
During 2007, we continued to expand our long-term funding base by issuing, either directly or
through our subsidiaries, $30.7 billion of senior deposit notes in various currencies and markets.
Total long-term funding outstanding increased $18.2 billion. Outstanding senior debt containing
ratings triggers, which would accelerate repayment, constitutes a very small proportion of our
overall outstanding debt.
Other liquidity and funding sources
We use commercial mortgage, residential mortgage and credit card receivable-backed securitization
programs as alternative sources of funding and for liquidity and asset/liability management
purposes. We hold retained interests in our residential mortgage and credit card securitization
programs. Our total outstanding mortgage-backed securities sold increased year over year by $2.1
billion. Our credit card receivables, which are financed through notes issued by a securitization
special purposes entity, increased year over year by $509 million. For further details, refer to
the Off-balance sheet arrangements section and Note 5 to our Consolidated Financial Statements.
Impact of global market turmoil to our term funding capacity
Despite recent global market events,
including a reduction in liquidity in term funding markets, our liquidity and funding position
remains sound and adequate to execute our strategy. There are no known trends, demands, commitments
or events that are presently expected to materially change this position.
By leveraging our new and existing domestic and global funding programs, we continued to raise
wholesale term funding in size during the latter half of 2007. Most of the funding was raised
through large benchmark-sized transactions, but a significant amount was also raised in a variety
of lower-cost funding transactions. In 2007, we raised wholesale term funding in 12 different
currencies, including six currencies in the fourth quarter. The market turmoil did not prevent us
from launching the first Canadian covered bond program, where we sold €2 billion of notes in the
inaugural transaction, which settled on November 5, 2007. Our ability to raise wholesale term
funding continued to significantly exceed our funding needs during the latter half of 2007.
Contractual obligations
In the normal course of business, we enter into contracts that give rise to commitments of future
minimum payments that affect our liquidity. Depending on the nature of these commitments, the
obligation may be recorded on- or off-balance sheet. The table below provides a summary of our
future contractual funding commitments.
Contractual obligations
Table 57
2007
2006
2005
(C$ millions) (1)
Within 1 year
1 to 3 years
Over 3 to 5 years
Over 5 years
Total
Total
Total
Unsecured long-term funding
$
16,892
$
16,350
$
13,628
$
4,670
$
51,540
$
33,361
$
24,004
Subordinated debentures
—
118
—
6,117
6,235
7,103
8,167
Obligations under leases (2)
494
835
608
1,224
3,161
2,486
2,508
$
17,386
$
17,303
$
14,236
$
12,011
$
60,936
$
42,950
$
34,679
(1)
Amounts represent principal only and exclude accrued interest.
(2)
Substantially all of our lease commitments are operating.
Royal
Bank of Canada: Annual Report 2007 98 Management’s Discussion and Analysis
Reputation risk is the risk that an activity undertaken by an organization or its
representatives will impair its image in the community or lower public confidence in it, resulting
in the loss of business, legal action or increased regulatory oversight.
Reputation risk can arise from a number of events and primarily occurs in connection with
regulatory, legal and operational risks. Operational failures and non-compliance with laws and
regulations can have a significant reputational impact on us.
In addition to the six risk management principles discussed earlier in the Risk management
overview section, the following principles also apply to our overall management of reputation
risk:
•
We must operate with integrity at all times in order to sustain a
strong and positive reputation
•
Protecting our reputation is the responsibility of all our employees,
including senior management, and extends to all members of the Board of
Directors.
Code of Conduct
Our corporate values and Code of Conduct underpin the management of risk to our reputation and
drive our ethical culture. Our Code of Conduct is the foundation of employee and director awareness
of the kinds of conduct that protect our reputation, and those that put our reputation at risk.
Responsibilities
The management of reputation risk is overseen by the Board of Directors. The key senior
management committees involved with
monitoring and reporting on reputation risk at an enterprise level are: Ethics and Compliance
Committee, Policy Review Committee, Structured Transactions Oversight Committee and the Group
Risk Committee.
Risk control
Policies
Policies and procedures support the management of reputation risk across the organization. Business
segments have specific policies in place to manage the risks within their businesses, including
reputation risk. A comprehensive set of policy requirements applies to the identification and
assessment of reputation risk, including Know Your Client due diligence controls and procedures,
anti-money laundering and anti-terrorist financing policy requirements, auditor independence
requirements, research standards, whistle blowing, and the requirements for managing conflicts of
interest.
Reporting
The responsibility for monitoring and reporting on reputation risk issues is primarily within GRM.
Regular comprehensive reporting is provided to the Group Risk Committee and the Board of Directors
and its committees. This includes annual reporting on fraud issues, litigation issues and quarterly
reporting on regulatory, compliance and operational risk issues. Reputation risk issues are also
raised in internal audit reports provided to senior management, summaries of which are provided to
the Audit Committee.
REGULATORY AND LEGAL RISK
Regulatory and legal risk is the risk of negative impact to business activities, earnings or
capital, regulatory relationships or reputation as a result of failure to comply with or a failure
to adapt to current and changing regulations, law, industry codes or rules, regulatory expectations
or ethical standards.
Global Compliance, which is a part of Group Risk Management (GRM) has developed a
comprehensive enterprise compliance management (ECM) framework that is consistent with regulatory
guidance from the OSFI and other regulators. The framework is designed to promote the proactive,
risk-based management of regulatory risk. It applies to all of our businesses and operations, legal
entities and employees globally and confirms the shared accountability of all employees across the
organization for ensuring we maintain robust and effective regulatory risk and compliance controls.
The framework covers the following eight elements of compliance management: liaison with
regulators, risk identification and assessment, control design and evaluation, learning and
awareness, compliance execution, monitoring and oversight, issue management and reporting, and new
initiative management.
Responsibilities
Global Compliance sets out the enterprise-wide requirements for the identification, assessment,
control, monitoring and reporting of regulatory and compliance risk (and associated operational and
reputation risk), as well as remediation of any issues identified. Oversight is provided by the
Board of Directors through the CR&RPC and the Audit Committee. The Ethics and Compliance Committee
supports our management of regulatory risk. It approves compliance programs and compliance-related
policies and informs and advises the Group Risk Committee (GRC), CR&RPC and the Audit Committee on
significant regulatory issues and remedial measures.
The Chief Compliance Officer (CCO) and Global Compliance work closely with business partners
to ensure the overall effectiveness
of compliance and regulatory risk management controls across the enterprise through the ECM
framework, which includes policies for consistent and effective compliance, independent oversight
of compliance controls, timely reporting of trends and escalation of issues to senior management
and the Board of Directors and timely execution of appropriate action plans.
Risk measurement
The identification and assessment of regulatory risk includes formal risk assessment activities
carried out across the organization, both at the individual business and operational level, and at
the enterprise level. Risk is measured through the assessment of the impact of regulatory and
organizational changes, the introduction of new products and services, and the acquisition or
development of new lines of business. It is also measured through the testing of the effectiveness
of the controls established to ensure compliance with regulatory requirements and expectations.
Although the use of metrics to measure compliance-related matters is relatively new and there are
few proven methods for detecting leading indicators, we are working to develop such metrics.
Meanwhile, we use what measures are available to identify issues and trends.
Risk control
Policies
We have a strong ethical and compliance culture grounded in our Code of Conduct. The Code of
Conduct is regularly reviewed and updated to ensure that it continues to meet the expectations of
regulators and other stakeholders. All our employees must reconfirm their understanding of and
commitment to comply with the Code of Conduct at least every two years, and employees in certain
key roles, such as Group Executive and others in financial oversight roles as identified in our
Auditor Independence Policy, must do so annually.
Royal Bank of Canada: Annual Report 2007 Management’s Discussion and Analysis 99
We provide online and face-to-face training for all our employees in the area of anti-money
laundering compliance and training in other compliance and regulatory risk related matters for
relevant employees through other online tools and other job aids, as part of employees’ regular job
training, in new employee orientation materials, and periodically through targeted face-to-face or
webcast training.
Reporting
On a quarterly basis, the CCO reports compliance matters to senior
management, management committees, the Audit Committee and
CR&RPC. In addition, the CCO provides an annual report on overall compliance, and on specific
topics, such as related party transactions, conflicts of interest, and compliance with Canadian
consumer protection requirements, and the Global Chief Anti-Money Laundering Officer reports at
least annually on anti-money laundering and anti-terrorist financing compliance. Similarly, senior
compliance officers of our operating subsidiaries provide relevant annual and quarterly reports to
their respective senior management and Boards of Directors.
ENVIRONMENTAL RISK
Environmental risk is the risk of loss to financial, operational or reputation value resulting from
the impact of environmental issues. Environmental risk arises from our business activities and our
operations. For example, the environmental issues associated with our clients’ purchase and sale of
contaminated property or development of large-scale projects may give rise to credit and reputation
risk for us. Operational and legal risks may arise when we are faced with environmental issues at
our branches, offices or data processing centres.
We undertake independent and collaborative research to identify and better understand the
material environmental risks we face. Some current and emerging issues include climate change,
biodiversity, water and the rights of indigenous peoples, among others.
Responsibilities
Environmental risk management activities are managed by the Corporate Environmental Affairs Group
(CEA) with support from our business segments and Corporate Support groups. The CEA is responsible
for developing and implementing the environmental risk management system, including identifying
environmental risks in the organization, designing and supporting environmental risk policies,
programs and initiatives, monitoring implementation, and leading communication and training. The
CEA also provides advisory services and support to business and functional units on the management
of specific environmental risks.
Risk measurement
Some environmental risks associated with our business and operational activities can be easily
quantified while others are assessed on a qualitative basis. For example, in our lending
activities, we quantify the potential cost of cleaning up environmental contamination of properties
used as security for loans, and the cost to an obligor of making operational changes that may be
required to meet environmental regulatory requirements or satisfy other obligations. In our own
operations, we quantify our cost to maintain compliance with environmental regulations or
applicable standards. Other environmental risks are assessed on a qualitative basis, for example,
the exposure of a particular industry to the effects of climate change and climate change
regulations. As environmental risk measurement methodologies mature, particularly with respect to
climate change, we will incorporate more quantitative risk measures into our processes.
Risk control
We manage environmental risk by maintaining an environmental management system, including policy
requirements, management and mitigation strategies, and reporting. Specifically, to manage
environmental risk, we:
•
Develop and maintain environmental policies, standards, procedures and guidelines
•
Monitor relevant laws and regulations, as well as other requirements to which the bank adheres
•
Maintain environmental programs and initiatives
•
Establish roles and responsibilities for environmental management in the organization
•
Train employees to identify and manage environmental risks
•
Maintain an open dialogue with stakeholders, both internal and external to the organization
•
Measure our performance and compare it to our objectives, which enables us to identify
enhancement opportunities
•
Periodically verify that our environmental risk management policies and processes are
operating as intended.
Policies
Our Environmental Blueprint, launched in October 2007, updates our corporate environmental policy.
It details environmental issues that are important to our stakeholders and us and outlines our
commitment to reducing our environmental footprint, responsible lending and investment, and
business growth and development of environmental products and services.
Our suite of environmental credit risk management policies enables us to proactively identify
and manage environmental risks in our lending activities. These policies are regularly reviewed to
ensure compliance with legal and operational requirements, and to take into account evolving
business activities.
In addition to general policies for commercial and corporate lending, we have sector-specific
and business-segment-specific policies and guidelines. For example, we have a separate Policy on
Social and Environmental Review in our Project Finance business, which reflects our commitment to
the Equator Principles (EPs). The EPs, which were revised in 2007, are voluntary guidelines that
help financial institutions address the environmental and social risks associated with project
finance.
Management and mitigation
In addition to adherence to policies, standards, procedures and guidelines, environmental risk is
mitigated through transaction structuring and the use of insurance as well as other mechanisms. The
CEA supports lenders, risk managers and clients in the management and mitigation of environmental
risks in transactions, by recommending strategies to treat, eliminate or transfer (via insurance)
environmental risk.
Reporting
The Board of Directors and senior management committees are periodically provided with reports and
analysis on risks associated with environmental issues (for example, climate change and the Kyoto
Accord, and the EPs), as appropriate. Loan losses resulting from environmental issues are tracked
and reported to senior management.
We report on our implementation of the EPs annually in our Corporate Responsibility Report and
Public Accountability Statement (CRR & PAS) and on rbc.com. The CRR & PAS also provides information
about our environmental policies, lending, emerging issues, stakeholder engagement, and
environmental performance and initiatives.
Royal
Bank of Canada: Annual Report 2007 100 Management’s Discussion and Analysis
Insurance risk is the risk of loss that may occur when actuarial assumptions made in insurance
product design and pricing activities differ from actual experience. Insurance risk arises from our
life and health, creditor, home and auto, and travel insurance, and reinsurance businesses.
Insurance risk can be categorized into the following sub-risks:
•
Claims risk: The risk that the actual severity and/or frequency of
claims differ from the levels assumed in pricing calculations. This
risk can occur through (i) a misestimation of expected claims
activities as compared to actual claims activities, or (ii) the
misselection of a risk during the underwriting process
•
Policyholder behaviour risk: The risk that the behaviour of
policy-holders relating to premium payments, policy withdrawals or
loans, policy lapses, surrenders and other voluntary terminations
differs from the behaviour assumed in pricing calculations
•
Expense risk: The risk that the expense of acquiring or administering
policies, or of processing claims, exceeds the costs assumed in
pricing calculations.
Responsibilities
Insurance risk approval authorities are established by the Board of Directors upon recommendation
of its committees and delegated to senior management.
The respective boards of directors of the insurance subsidiaries are responsible for the
stewardship of the insurance companies. These boards of directors oversee and monitor the
management of the insurance subsidiaries and ensure that the subsidiaries are properly managed and
functioning within our overall strategies and policies.
Group Risk Management (GRM) is responsible for providing risk management direction and
oversight to the insurance businesses and for providing comprehensive reporting of insurance risks
facing the organization. The Appointed Actuaries of our Canadian insurance subsidiaries are
appointed by the boards of directors and have statutory requirements to provide opinions on
adequacy of liabilities, sufficiency of capital, the insurance company’s future financial condition
and fairness of treatment for policyholders. External actuarial reviewers, in accordance with the
OSFI guidelines and Canadian Institute of Actuaries standards, provide oversight on the work of the
Appointed Actuaries. Our international insurance subsidiaries receive similar actuarial oversight.
Global Functions and Global Technology and Operations (GTO) also provide direction and oversight to
manage risk within their areas of expertise.
Insurance business units are responsible for the active management of insurance risk in
partnership with GRM, other Global Functions groups and GTO.
Risk measurement
We measure insurance risks at regular intervals to ensure that our risk profile is appropriately
monitored, reported, and aligned with business assumptions. These risk measurements are used for
Economic Capital quantification, valuation of actuarial liabilities, and to meet statutory
reporting requirements. This process is managed by GRM through the use of models.
Models used for risk measurement are subject to a robust and systematic process of review and
reporting in accordance with our Model Risk Policy. Key elements of the policy include maintaining
appropriate model documentation, an approval process to ensure
appropriate segregation of duties, independent and periodic model reviews, and clear accountability
and oversight.
Risk control
Policies
Insurance risk policies articulate our strategies to identify, prioritize and manage insurance
risk. GRM is responsible for insurance risk policies which establish the expectations and
parameters within which the insurance businesses may operate, communicate our risk tolerance, and
ensure accountability through clear roles and responsibilities.
Authorities and limits
Risk approval authorities and limits are established by the Board of Directors and delegated to
management within the business units in order to guide insurance business activities. These
delegated authorities and limits ensure our insurance portfolio is well diversified and within the
risk appetite as approved by the Board of Directors.
Risk oversight and approval
GRM provides independent oversight over our insurance business activities including product
development, product pricing, underwriting and claims management. GRM also approves authority for
activities, which exceed business unit authorities and limits, and certain business activities,
which are deemed to be of significant risk.
Risk mitigation
Our key elements for identifying, assessing and managing insurance risk include a risk-based
approach for product development and pricing, effective guidelines and practices for underwriting
and claims management. In addition, transferring insurance risk to independent insurance companies
or reinsurance is used to diversify our portfolio of insurance risks, limit loss exposure to large
risks, and provide additional capacity for future growth.
Actuarial liabilities
Actuarial liabilities are estimates of the amounts required to meet obligations resulting from
insurance contracts. Liabilities for estimated future policy benefits and expenses are established
in accordance with the standards of practice of the Canadian Institute of Actuaries and the
requirements of the OSFI and other relevant professional and regulatory bodies. Actuarial
liabilities under Canadian GAAP are calculated using the Canadian Asset Liability Method. These
estimates and actuarial assumptions include explicit provisions for adverse deviations to ensure
adequacy of liabilities and are validated through extensive internal and independent external
reviews and audits.
Reporting
GRM regularly provides independent evaluation and reporting on our insurance risk exposures to
management at the business segment level and at the enterprise level. The reports analyze and
communicate insurance risk information and contribute to the overall understanding of insurance
risk. Reporting includes an assessment of risks facing the insurance business units, trends related
to all claims and adequacy of actuarial liabilities. The reports also provide an assessment of the
risk-return profile of insurance products and a view of future potential risks.
STRATEGIC RISK
Strategic risk is the risk that an enterprise or a particular business area makes inappropriate
strategic choices, or is unable to successfully implement selected strategies or related plans and
decisions.
We apply the following principles to manage strategic risk:
•
Significant decisions are aligned with our enterprise strategy
•
Business segment strategy is aligned with our enterprise strategy
•
All business strategies are supported by market and competitive analysis and financial projection of their expected impact.
The effective identification and assessment of this risk is critical for us and involves the Group
Executive and the Board of Directors when identifying and assessing various strategic opportunities
for the organization.
Royal Bank of Canada: Annual Report 2007 Management’s Discussion and Analysis 101
Responsibility for successfully implementing strategies is mandated to the individual heads of the
businesses. The Strategy and Development team within Global Functions is responsible for the
articulation of our enterprise strategy. This team also provides support for the development of
strategies of the business segments and lines of business. The identification and analysis of
strategic issues, opportunities and risks we face is an ongoing component of their overall
responsibilities.
Risk control
The project appropriation request (PAR) process is used to manage strategic risk. Our strategic
initiatives group provides an initial review and co-ordinates circulating each PAR to GRM, Law and
Corporate Treasury for review, comments and approval. The Board of Directors and/or Group Risk
Committee may approve the finalized version if their approval is warranted. PARs are a critical
part of our corporate governance framework and are available for review by regulators or our
external auditors as required.
COMPETITIVE RISK
Competitive risk is the risk associated with the inability to build or maintain sustainable
competitive advantage in a given market or markets. This risk can arise within or outside the
financial sector, from traditional or non-traditional competitors, domestically or globally.
We manage competitive risk through appropriate identification and assessment as part of our
overall risk management process. This includes risk assessment of new or enhanced products and
services, alliances and acquisitions. Our ability to adapt to a changing competitive environment
will impact our overall financial performance.
SYSTEMIC RISK
Systemic risk is the risk that the financial system as a whole may not withstand the effects of a
crisis resulting from extraordinary economic, political, social or financial circumstances. This
could result in financial, reputation or other losses.
Systemic risk is considered to be the least controllable risk we face. Our ability to mitigate
this risk when undertaking business activities is very limited, other than through collaborative
mechanisms between industry participants, and, as appropriate, the public sector, to reduce the
frequency and impact of these risks.
ADDITIONAL RISKS THAT MAY AFFECT FUTURE RESULTS
By their very nature, forward-looking statements, including those made in this document,
require us to make assumptions and are subject to inherent risks and uncertainties which may cause
our actual results to differ materially from our expectations expressed in such forward-looking
statements. Factors that might cause our actual financial performance to vary from that described
in our forward-looking statements include credit, market, operational, liquidity and funding risks,
and other risks discussed in detail in the Risk management section. In addition, the following
discussion sets forth other factors we believe could cause our actual results to differ materially
from expected results.
Industry factors
General business and economic conditions in Canada, the United States and other countries in which
we conduct business Interest rates, foreign exchange rates, the stability of various financial
markets, including the impact from the continuing volatility in the U.S. subprime and related
markets and lack of liquidity in various other financial markets, consumer spending, business
investment, government spending, the level of activity and volatility of the capital markets,
inflation and terrorism each impact the business and economic environments in which we operate and,
ultimately, the level of business activity we conduct and earnings we generate in a specific
geographic region. For example, an economic downturn in a country may result in high unemployment
and lower family income, corporate earnings, business investment and consumer spending, and could
adversely affect the demand for our loan and other products. In addition, our provision for credit
losses would likely increase, resulting in lower earnings. Similarly, a downturn in a particular
equity or debt market could cause a reduction in new issue and investor trading activity or assets
under management and assets under administration, resulting in lower fee, commission and other
revenue. Also, defaults
by a large financial institution in Canada, the United States or internationally could adversely
affect the financial markets generally and us specifically.
Currency rates
Our revenue, expenses and income denominated in currencies other than the Canadian dollar are
subject to fluctuations in the movement of the Canadian dollar relative to those currencies. Such
fluctuations may affect our overall business and financial results.
Our most significant exposure
is to the U.S. dollar due to our level of operations in the U.S., and other activities conducted in
U.S. dollars. The strengthening of the Canadian dollar compared to the U.S. dollar over the last
four years has had a significant effect on our results. We are also exposed to the British pound
and the Euro due to our activities conducted internationally in these currencies. Further
appreciation of the Canadian dollar relative to the U.S. dollar,
British pound and Euro reduced
the translated value of U.S. dollar-, British pound- and Euro-denominated revenue, expenses and
earnings.
Government monetary and other policies
Our businesses and earnings are affected by the monetary policies that are adopted by the Bank of
Canada and the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System in the United States, as well as
those adopted by international agencies, in jurisdictions in which we operate. For example,
monetary policy decisions by the Bank of Canada have an impact on the level of interest rates,
fluctuations of which can have an impact on our earnings. As well, such policies can adversely
affect our clients and counterparties in Canada, the United States and internationally, which may
increase the risk of default by such clients and counterparties. Our businesses and earnings are
also affected by fiscal or other policies that are adopted by various regulatory authorities in
Canada, the United States and international agencies.
Royal
Bank of Canada: Annual Report 2007 102 Management’s Discussion and Analysis
The competition for clients among financial services companies in the consumer and business markets
in which we operate is intense. Client loyalty and retention can be influenced by a number of
factors, including relative service levels, the prices and attributes of our products or services,
our reputation and actions taken by our competitors. Other financial companies, such as insurance
and mono-line companies and non-financial companies are increasingly offering services
traditionally provided by banks. Such competition could also reduce fee revenue and adversely
affect our earnings.
Changes in laws and regulations
Laws and regulations are in place to protect the financial and other interests of our clients,
investors and the public interest. Changes to laws, including tax laws, regulations or regulatory
policies, including changes to our capital management framework, as well as changes in how they are interpreted, implemented or enforced, could adversely
affect us, for example, by lowering barriers to entry in the businesses in which we operate or
increasing our costs of compliance. In addition, our failure to comply with applicable laws,
regulations or regulatory policies could result in sanctions and financial penalties by regulatory
agencies that could adversely impact our reputation and earnings.
Judicial or regulatory judgments and legal proceedings
Although we take what we believe to be
reasonable measures designed to ensure compliance with laws, regulations and regulatory policies in
the jurisdictions in which we conduct business, there is no assurance that we always will be, or
will be deemed to be, in compliance. Accordingly, it is possible that we could receive a judicial
or regulatory judgment or decision that results in fines, damages and other costs that would damage
our reputation and negatively impact on our earnings.
We are also subject to litigation arising in the ordinary course of our business. The adverse
resolution of any litigation could have a material adverse effect on our results or could give rise
to significant reputational damage, which could impact our future business prospects.
Accuracy and completeness of information on clients and counterparties
When deciding to extend credit or enter into other transactions with clients and counterparties, we
may rely on information provided by or on behalf of clients and counterparties, including audited
financial statements and other financial information. We also may rely on representations of
clients and counterparties as to the completeness and accuracy of that information. Our financial
results could be adversely impacted if the financial statements and other financial information
relating to clients and counterparties on which we rely do not comply with GAAP or are materially
misleading.
Bank specific factors
Execution of our strategy
Our ability to execute on our objectives and strategic goals will influence our financial
performance. If our strategic goals do not meet with success or there is a change in our strategic
goals, our financial results could be adversely affected.
Acquisitions and joint ventures
Although we regularly explore opportunities for strategic acquisitions of, or joint ventures with,
companies in our lines of businesses, there is no assurance that we will receive required
regulatory or shareholder approvals or be able to complete acquisitions or joint ventures on terms
and conditions that satisfy our investment criteria. There is also no assurance we will achieve our
financial or strategic objectives or anticipated cost savings following acquisitions or forming
joint ventures. Our performance is contingent on retaining the clients and key employees of
acquired companies and joint ventures, and there is no assurance that we will always succeed in
doing so.
Changes in accounting standards, accounting policies and estimates
From time to time, the
Accounting Standards Board of the CICA changes the financial accounting and reporting standards
that govern the preparation of our financial statements. These changes can be difficult to
anticipate and can materially impact how we record and report our financial condition and results
of operations. In some instances, we may be required to retroactively apply a new or revised
standard that results in our restating prior period financial statements.
The accounting policies and methods we utilize determine how we report our financial condition
and results of operations, and they require management to make estimates or rely on assumptions
about matters that are inherently uncertain. Such estimates and assumptions may require revisions,
and changes to them may materially adversely affect our results of operations and financial
condition. Significant accounting policies are described in Note 1 to our Consolidated Financial
Statements.
As detailed in the Critical accounting policies and estimates section, we have identified
seven accounting policies as being “critical” to the presentation of our financial condition and
results of operations as they; (i) require management to make particularly subjective and/or
complex judgments about matters that are inherently uncertain; and (ii) carry the likelihood that
materially different amounts could be reported under different conditions or using different
assumptions and estimates.
Ability to attract employees and executives
Competition for qualified employees and executives
is intense both within the financial services industry and from non-financial industries
looking to recruit. If we are unable to retain and attract qualified employees and executives,
our results of operations and financial condition, including our competitive position, may be
materially adversely affected.
Changes to our credit ratings
There can be no assurance that our credit ratings and rating outlooks from rating agencies such as
Moody’s Investors Service, Standard & Poor’s, Fitch Ratings or DBRS will not be lowered or that
these ratings agencies will not issue adverse commentaries about us, potentially resulting in
higher financing costs and reduced access to capital markets. A lowering of our credit ratings may
also affect our ability, and the cost, to enter into normal course derivative or hedging
transactions.
Development and integration of our distribution networks
Although we regularly explore
opportunities to expand our distribution networks, either through acquisitions or organically by
adding, for example, new bank branches, insurance offices, online savings accounts and ATMs in
high-growth markets in Canada, the United States and internationally, if we are not able to develop
or integrate these distribution networks effectively, our results of operations and financial
condition may be negatively affected.
Other factors
Other factors that may affect actual results include changes in government trade policy, the timely
and successful development of new products and services, technological changes and our reliance on
third parties to provide components of our business infrastructure, fraud by internal or external
parties, unexpected changes in consumer spending and saving habits, the possible impact on our
business from disease or illness that affects local, national or global economies, disruptions to
public infrastructure, including transportation, communication, power and water, international
conflicts and other political developments including those relating to the war on terrorism, and
our success in anticipating and managing the associated risks.
Royal Bank of Canada: Annual Report 2007 Management’s Discussion and Analysis 103
We caution that the foregoing discussion of risk factors is not exhaustive and other factors
could also adversely affect our results. When relying on our forward-looking statements to make
decisions with respect to us, investors and others should carefully consider the foregoing factors,
other uncertainties and potential events, and
other industry- and bank-specific factors that may adversely affect our future results and the
market valuation placed on our common shares. Unless required by law, we do not undertake to update
any forward-looking statement, whether written or oral, that may be made from time to time by us or
on our behalf.
ADDITIONAL FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Net interest income on average assets and liabilities from continuing operations (1)
Table 58
Average balances (2)
Interest (3)
Average rate
(C$ millions, except percentage amounts)
2007
2006
2005
2007
2006
2005
2007
2006
2005
Assets
Deposits with other banks
Canada
$
1,570
$
1,218
$
915
$
43
$
41
$
31
2.74
%
3.37
%
3.39
%
United States
2,904
1,856
1,587
176
155
55
6.06
8.35
3.47
Other International
5,436
4,913
4,068
319
284
145
5.87
5.78
3.56
9,910
7,987
6,570
538
480
231
5.43
6.01
3.52
Securities
Trading
162,828
134,166
110,356
6,621
5,056
3,711
4.07
3.77
3.36
Available-for-sale (4)
31,516
—
—
1,044
—
—
3.31
—
—
Investments (4)
—
38,792
37,876
—
1,133
895
—
2.92
2.36
194,344
172,958
148,232
7,665
6,189
4,606
3.94
3.58
3.11
Asset purchased under reverse repurchase
agreements and securities borrowed
71,759
55,615
44,420
3,450
2,827
1,354
4.81
5.08
3.05
Loans (5)
Canada
Retail
152,588
135,852
124,001
9,376
8,157
7,037
6.14
6.00
5.67
Wholesale
31,541
31,539
28,087
1,047
1,264
1,262
3.32
4.01
4.49
184,129
167,391
152,088
10,423
9,421
8,299
5.66
5.63
5.46
United States
25,718
21,871
20,572
2,240
2,110
1,626
8.71
9.65
7.90
Other International
13,388
8,286
6,993
2,061
1,177
865
15.39
14.20
12.37
223,235
197,548
179,653
14,724
12,708
10,790
6.60
6.43
6.01
Total interest-earning assets
499,248
434,108
378,875
26,377
22,204
16,981
5.28
5.11
4.48
Non-interest-bearing deposits with other banks
2,137
2,806
2,567
—
—
—
—
—
—
Customers’ liability under acceptances
10,270
8,748
6,411
—
—
—
—
—
—
Other assets
69,345
56,438
57,447
—
—
—
—
—
—
Total assets
$
581,000
$
502,100
$
445,300
$
26,377
$
22,204
$
16,981
4.54
%
4.42
%
3.81
%
Liabilities and shareholders’ equity
Deposits (6)
Canada
$
166,983
$
167,015
$
161,866
$
5,669
$
5,024
$
3,724
3.39
%
3.01
%
2.30
%
United States
53,817
47,913
40,004
2,563
2,018
1,047
4.76
4.21
2.62
Other International
121,924
91,334
70,168
5,538
3,666
2,175
4.54
4.01
3.10
342,724
306,262
272,038
13,770
10,708
6,946
4.02
3.50
2.55
Obligations related to securities sold short
46,654
38,630
34,169
1,997
2,071
1,381
4.28
5.36
4.04
Obligations related to assets sold
under repurchase agreements
and securities loaned
42,503
32,786
25,912
2,364
1,882
1,120
5.56
5.74
4.32
Subordinated debentures
6,704
8,013
8,359
338
419
442
5.04
5.23
5.29
Other interest-bearing liabilities
3,569
2,759
4,041
376
328
299
10.54
11.89
7.40
Total interest-bearing liabilities
442,154
388,450
344,519
18,845
15,408
10,188
4.26
3.97
2.96
Non-interest-bearing deposits
25,752
17,037
16,159
—
—
—
—
—
—
Acceptances
10,270
8,882
6,414
—
—
—
—
—
—
Other liabilities
79,087
66,755
58,757
—
—
—
—
—
—
Total liabilities
$
557,263
$
481,124
$
425,849
$
18,845
$
15,408
$
10,188
3.38
%
3.20
%
2.39
%
Shareholders’ equity
Preferred
$
1,553
$
1,022
$
811
$
—
$
—
$
—
—
%
—
%
—
%
Common
22,184
19,954
18,640
—
—
—
—
—
—
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity
$
581,000
$
502,100
$
445,300
$
18,845
$
15,408
$
10,188
3.24
%
3.07
%
2.29
%
Net interest income and margin
$
581,000
$
502,100
$
445,300
$
7,532
$
6,796
$
6,793
1.30
%
1.35
%
1.53
%
Net interest income and margin
(average earning assets)(7)
Canada
$
280,385
$
257,319
$
229,184
$
6,435
$
6,045
$
5,628
2.30
%
2.35
%
2.46
%
United States
106,044
90,684
74,842
412
108
608
.39
.12
.81
Other International
112,819
86,105
74,849
685
643
557
.61
.75
.74
Total
$
499,248
$
434,108
$
378,875
$
7,532
$
6,796
$
6,793
1.51
%
1.57
%
1.79
%
(1)
Geographic classification for selected assets and liabilities is based on the domicile of the
booking point of the subject assets and liabilities.
(2)
Calculated using methods intended to approximate the average of the daily balances for the
period.
(3)
Interest income includes loan fees of $331 million (2006 — $348 million; 2005 — $343
million).
(4)
Available-for-sale securities are carried at fair value. Prior to November 1, 2006,
Available-for-sale securities were classified as investment securities and were carried at amortized
cost.
(5)
Average balances include impaired loans.
(6)
Deposits include savings deposits with average balances of $46 billion (2006 — $46 billion;
2005 — $46 billion), interest expense of $.4 billion (2006 — $.4 billion; 2005 — $.3
billion) and average rates of .9% (2006 — .8%; 2005 — .6%). Deposits also include term
deposits with average balances of $240 billion (2006 — $206 billion; 2005 — $181 billion),
interest expense of $10.7 billion (2006 — $8.3 billion; 2005 — $5.3 billion) and average
rates of 4.43% (2006 — 4.02%; 2005 — 2.95%).
(7)
During the year, we reviewed the geographic information that was used to prepare the Net
interest income and margin for the prior periods and determined that some information was
incorrectly classified; accordingly, the Net interest income and margins presented for the
comparative periods have been revised.
Royal Bank of Canada: Annual Report 2007
104 Management’s Discussion and Analysis
Total loans and acceptances, net of allowance for loan losses
$249,722
$
217,638
$
197,490
$
177,100
$
166,337
(1)
Geographic information is based on residence of borrower.
(2)
Includes small business exposure managed on a pooled basis.
(3)
Includes small business exposure managed on an individual client basis.
(4)
Sovereign refers to all central governments and agencies, central banks, as well as other
qualifying public sector entities and multilateral development banks.
Royal Bank of Canada: Annual Report 2007
Management’s Discussion and Analysis 105
Gross impaired loans as a % of loans and acceptances:
Residential mortgages
.19
%
.17
%
.16
%
.19
%
.18
%
Personal
.39
%
.46
%
.45
%
.55
%
.79
%
Small business (2)
.72
%
.56
%
.56
%
.41
%
1.27
%
Retail
.25
%
.25
%
.24
%
.29
%
.36
%
Wholesale
.88
%
.66
%
.74
%
1.73
%
2.46
%
Total
.45
%
.38
%
.39
%
.70
%
1.04
%
Specific allowance for loan losses as a % of gross impaired loans
30.79
%
31.53
%
36.43
%
38.68
%
43.38
%
(1)
Geographic information is based on residence of borrower.
(2)
Includes small business exposure managed on a pooled basis.
(3)
Includes small business exposure managed on an individual client basis.
(4)
Sovereign refers to all central governments and agencies, central banks, as well as other
qualifying public sector entities and multilateral development banks.
(5)
Includes foreclosed assets of $36 million in 2007 (2006 — $9 million; 2005 — $17 million;
2004 — $27 million; 2003 — $34 million).
(6)
Past due loans greater than 90 days not included in impaired loans were $353 million in 2007
(2006 — $305 million; 2005 — $304 million; 2004 — $219 million; 2003 — $222 million).
Royal Bank of Canada: Annual Report 2007
106 Management’s Discussion and Analysis
Provision for (recovery of) credit losses by portfolio and geography (1)
Table 61
For the year ended October 31
(C$ millions, except percentage amounts)
2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
Residential mortgages
$
13
$
6
$
2
$
7
$
8
Personal
364
306
259
222
254
Credit cards
223
163
194
167
155
Small business (2)
34
29
27
27
39
Retail
$
634
$
504
$
482
$
423
$
456
Business (3)
Agriculture
$
2
$
(1
)
$
(12
)
$
7
$
—
Automotive
2
4
—
2
—
Consumer goods
27
7
24
(11
)
17
Energy
(7
)
(53
)
(20
)
50
78
Non-bank financial services
—
4
10
—
(1
)
Forest products
10
2
(52
)
7
16
Industrial products
10
4
(7
)
13
5
Mining and metals
1
—
(1
)
(3
)
5
Real estate and related
70
1
(11
)
(1
)
(8
)
Technology and media
(2
)
(5
)
(6
)
2
32
Transportation and environment
7
1
8
(32
)
79
Other
28
14
(26
)
64
42
Sovereign (4)
—
—
—
—
—
Bank
—
—
—
—
—
Wholesale
$
148
$
(22
)
$
(93
)
$
98
$
265
Total specific provision
$
782
$
482
$
389
$
521
$
721
Canada
Residential mortgages
$
5
$
6
$
1
$
6
$
4
Personal
334
296
247
211
230
Credit cards
220
161
192
166
152
Small business (2)
34
29
27
27
39
Retail
$
593
$
492
$
467
$
410
$
425
Business (3)
102
15
(32
)
3
102
Sovereign (4)
—
—
—
—
—
Bank
—
—
—
—
—
Wholesale
$
102
$
15
$
(32
)
$
3
$
102
$
695
$
507
$
435
$
413
$
527
United States
Retail
$
34
$
12
$
15
$
13
$
30
Wholesale
50
(38
)
(60
)
106
78
$
84
$
(26
)
$
(45
)
$
119
$
108
Other International
Retail
$
7
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
1
Wholesale
(4
)
1
(1
)
(11
)
85
$
3
$
1
$
(1
)
$
(11
)
$
86
Total specific provision
$
782
$
482
$
389
$
521
$
721
Total general provision
$
9
$
(53
)
$
66
$
(175
)
$
—
Total provision for credit losses
$
791
$
429
$
455
$
346
$
721
Specific provision as a % of average net loans and acceptances
.33
%
.23
%
.21
%
.30
%
.43
%
(1)
Geographic information is based on residence of borrower.
(2)
Includes small business exposure managed on a pooled basis.
(3)
Includes small business exposure managed on an individual client basis.
(4)
Sovereign refers to all central governments and agencies, central banks, as well as other
qualifying public sector entities and multilateral development banks.
Royal Bank of Canada: Annual Report 2007
Management’s Discussion and Analysis 107
Allowance for credit losses by portfolio and geography (1)
Table 62
(C$ millions, except percentage amounts)
2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
Allowance at beginning of year
$
1,486
$
1,568
$
1,714
$
2,164
$
2,314
Provision for credit losses
791
429
455
346
721
Write-offs by portfolio
Residential mortgages
(5
)
(5
)
(5
)
(7
)
(10
)
Personal
(444
)
(379
)
(353
)
(332
)
(379
)
Credit cards
(268
)
(204
)
(237
)
(207
)
(192
)
Small business (2)
(42
)
(36
)
(34
)
(44
)
(53
)
Retail
$
(759
)
$
(624
)
$
(629
)
$
(590
)
$
(634
)
Business (3)
$
(109
)
$
(89
)
$
(141
)
$
(411
)
$
(348
)
Sovereign (4)
—
—
—
—
—
Bank
—
—
—
—
—
Wholesale
$
(109
)
$
(89
)
$
(141
)
$
(411
)
$
(348
)
Less developed countries exposures
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
—
Total write-offs by portfolio
$
(868
)
$
(713
)
$
(770
)
$
(1,001
)
$
(982
)
Recoveries by portfolio
Residential mortgages
$
1
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
—
Personal
74
64
69
68
68
Credit cards
46
41
43
39
37
Small business (2)
7
7
9
11
12
Retail
$
128
$
112
$
121
$
118
$
117
Business (3)
$
42
$
93
$
53
$
98
$
53
Sovereign (4)
—
—
—
—
—
Bank
—
—
—
—
—
Wholesale
$
42
$
93
$
53
$
98
$
53
Total recoveries by portfolio
$
170
$
205
$
174
$
216
$
170
Net write-offs
$
(698
)
$
(508
)
$
(596
)
$
(785
)
$
(812
)
Adjustments (5)
(7
)
(3
)
(5
)
(11
)
(59
)
Total allowance for credit losses at end of year
$
1,572
$
1,486
$
1,568
$
1,714
$
2,164
Canada
Residential mortgages
$
13
$
11
$
9
$
11
$
12
Personal
79
88
101
108
129
Small business (2)
9
9
8
6
13
Retail
$
101
$
108
$
118
$
125
$
154
Business (3)
153
112
112
202
284
Sovereign (4)
—
—
—
—
—
Bank
—
—
—
—
—
Wholesale
$
153
$
112
$
112
$
202
$
284
$
254
$
220
$
230
$
327
$
438
United States
Retail
$
14
$
3
$
3
$
5
$
11
Wholesale
54
12
18
118
131
$
68
$
15
$
21
$
123
$
142
Other
International
Retail
$
13
$
12
$
12
$
14
$
15
Wholesale
16
16
19
23
162
$
29
$
28
$
31
$
37
$
177
Total specific allowance for loan losses
$
351
$
263
$
282
$
487
$
757
General allowance
$
1,221
$
1,223
$
1,286
$
1,227
$
1,407
Total allowance for credit losses
$
1,572
$
1,486
$
1,568
$
1,714
$
2,164
Key ratios
Allowance for credit losses as a % of loans and acceptances
.63
%
.68
%
.79
%
.97
%
1.30
%
Net write-offs as a % of average net loans and acceptances
.30
%
.25
%
.32
%
.46
%
.49
%
(1)
Geographic information is based on residence of borrower.
(2)
Includes small business exposure managed on a pooled basis.
(3)
Includes small business exposure managed on an individual client basis.
(4)
Sovereign refers to all central governments and agencies, central banks, as well as other
qualifying public sector entities and multilateral development banks.
(5)
Other adjustments include primarily foreign exchange translations on non-Canadian dollar
denominated allowance for credit losses and acquisition adjustments for Flag Bank, $21
million in 2007; Provident Financial Group Inc., $6 million in 2004; Admiralty Bancorp,
Inc., $8 million in 2003.
Royal Bank of Canada: Annual
Report 2007
108 Management’s Discussion and Analysis
A bill of exchange or negotiable instrument drawn by the borrower for payment at maturity and
accepted by a bank. The acceptance constitutes a guarantee of payment by the bank and can be traded
in the money market. The bank earns a “stamping fee” for providing this guarantee.
Allowance for credit losses
The amount deemed adequate by management to absorb identified credit losses as well as losses that
have been incurred but are not yet identifiable as at the balance sheet date. This allowance is
established to cover the lending portfolio including loans, acceptances, guarantees, letters of
credit and unfunded commitments. The allowance is increased by the provision for credit losses,
which is charged to income and decreased by the amount of write-offs, net of recoveries in the
period.
Assets-to-capital multiple
Total assets plus specified off-balance sheet items, as defined by the OSFI, divided by total
regulatory capital.
Assets under administration (AUA)
Assets administered by us which are beneficially owned by clients. Services provided in respect of
assets under administration are of an administrative nature, including safekeeping, collecting
investment income, settling purchase and sale transactions, and record keeping.
Assets under management (AUM)
Assets managed by us which are beneficially owned by clients. Services provided in respect of
assets under management include the selection of investments and the provision of investment
advice. We have assets under management that are also administered by us and included in assets
under administration.
Average balances
Average balances are calculated using methods intended to approximate the average of the daily
balances of the period.
Average earning assets
The
average carrying value of assets that give rise to our reported net
interest income including deposits with banks, securities, assets purchased under reverse
repurchase agreements and securities borrowed, and loans based on daily balances for the period
ending October 31 in each financial year.
Basis point (bp)
One one-hundredth of a percentage point (.01%).
Canadian GAAP
Canadian generally accepted accounting principles.
Capital adequacy
The level of capital that is sufficient to underpin risk and accommodate potential unexpected
increases in risk within specified regulatory targets while maintaining our business plans. This
includes risks for which minimum regulatory capital requirements may not be specified.
Capital position
Quantifies the extent to which illiquid assets are funded by non-core liabilities
and represents a formula-based measure of both comparative and directional structural liquidity
risk.
Cash capital position
Quantifies the extent to which illiquid assets are funded by non-core liabilities and represents a
formula-based measure of both comparative and directional structural liquidity risk.
Collateral
Assets pledged as security for a loan or other obligation. Collateral can take many forms, such as
cash, highly rated securities, property, inventory and equipment and receivables.
Collateralized
debt obligation (CDO)
An investment grade security that is backed by a pool of bonds, loans and/or any other type of debt
instrument.
Covered bonds
Full recourse on-balance sheet obligations issued by banks and credit institutions that are also
fully collateralized by assets over which investors enjoy a priority claim in the event of an
issuer’s insolvency.
Commitments to extend credit
Unutilized amount of credit facilities available to clients either in the form of loans, bankers’
acceptances and other on-balance sheet financing, or through off-balance sheet products such as
guarantees and letters of credit.
Derivative
A contract between two parties which requires little or no initial investment and where payments
between the parties are dependent upon the movements in price of an underlying instrument, index or
financial rate. Examples of derivatives include swaps, options, forward rate agreements and
futures. The notional amount of the derivative is the contract amount used as a reference point to
calculate the payments to be exchanged between the two parties, and the notional amount itself is
generally not exchanged by the parties.
Dividend payout ratio
Common dividends as a percentage of net income after preferred share dividends.
Dividend yield
Dividends per common share divided by the average of the high and low share prices in the relevant
period.
Documentary and commercial letters of credit
Written undertakings by a bank on behalf of its client (typically an importer), authorizing a third
party (typically an exporter) to draw drafts on the bank up to a stipulated amount under specific
terms and conditions. Such undertakings are established for the purpose of facilitating
international trade.
Earnings per share (EPS), basic
Calculated as net income less preferred share dividends divided by the average number of shares
outstanding.
Earnings per share (EPS), diluted
Calculated as net income less preferred share dividends divided by the average number of shares
outstanding adjusted for the dilutive
effects of stock options and other convertible securities.
Economic Capital (EC)
An estimate of the amount of equity capital required to underpin risks. It is calculated by
estimating the level of capital that is necessary to support our various businesses, given their
risks, consistent with our desired solvency standard and credit ratings.
Fair value
The amount
of consideration that would be agreed upon in an arm’s-length transaction between
knowledgeable, willing parties who are under no compulsion to act.
Guarantees and standby letters of credit
Primarily represent irrevocable assurances that a bank will make payments in the event that its
client cannot meet its financial obligations to third parties. Certain other guarantees, such as bid
and performance bonds, represent non-financial undertakings.
Hedge
A risk management technique used to insulate financial results from market, interest rate or foreign
currency exchange risk (exposure) arising from normal banking operations. The elimination or
reduction of such exposure is accomplished by establishing offsetting positions. For example,
assets denominated in foreign currencies can be offset with liabilities in the same currencies or
through the use of foreign exchange hedging instruments such as futures, options or foreign
exchange contracts.
Hedge funds
A type of fund, usually used by wealthy individuals and institutions, which is allowed to use
aggressive strategies that are unavailable to mutual funds, including selling short, leverage,
program trading, swaps, arbitrage and derivatives.
Impaired loans
Loans are classified as impaired when there has been a deterioration of credit quality to the extent
that management no longer has reasonable assurance of timely collection of the full amount of
principal and interest in accordance with the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Credit card
balances are not classified as impaired as they are directly written off after payments are 180 days
past due.
Innovative capital instruments
Capital
instruments issued by special purpose entities (SPEs),
whose primary purpose is to raise capital. We issue innovative capital instruments, RBC Trust
Capital Securities (TruCS) and RBC Trust Subordinated Notes (TSNs), through three SPEs: RBC Capital
Trust, RBC Capital Trust II and RBC Subordinated Notes Trust. As per the OSFI guidelines,
innovative capital can comprise up to 15% of net Tier 1 capital with an additional 5% eligible for
Tier 2 capital.
Managed basis
We report
our segments on a managed basis, which is intended to measure the performance of each
business segment as if it were a stand-alone business and reflect the way each segment is managed.
Royal Bank of Canada: Annual Report 2007
Glossary 181
Valuation of financial instruments using prevailing market prices or fair value as of the balance
sheet date.
Master netting agreement
An agreement between us and a counterparty designed to reduce the credit risk of multiple
derivative transactions through the creation of a legal right of offset of exposure in the event of
a default.
Net interest income
The difference between what is earned on assets such as loans and securities and what is paid on
liabilities such as deposits and subordinated debentures.
Net interest margin (average assets)
Net interest income as a percentage of total average assets.
Net interest margin (average earning assets)
Net interest income as a percentage of total average earning assets.
Non-bank sponsored asset-backed commercial paper
A short-term promissory note issued primarily by corporations, which is securitized with loans or
other receivables.
Normal course issuer bid (NCIB)
A program
for the repurchase of our own common shares, for cancellation through
a stock exchange, that is
subject to the various rules of the relevant stock exchange and securities commission.
Notional amount
The contract amount used as a reference point to calculate payments for derivatives.
Off-balance sheet financial instruments
A variety of credit-related arrangements offered to clients, which generally provides liquidity
protection.
Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions Canada (OSFI)
The primary regulator of federally chartered financial institutions and federally administered
pension plans in Canada. The OSFI’s mission is to safeguard policyholders, depositors and pension
plan members from undue loss.
Options
A contract or a provision of a contract that gives one party (the option holder) the right, but not
the obligation, to perform a specified transaction with another party (the option issuer or option
writer) according to specified terms.
Prepaid pension benefit cost
The cumulative excess of amounts contributed to a pension fund over the amounts recorded as pension
expense.
Provision for credit losses
The amount charged to income necessary to bring the allowance for credit losses to a level
determined appropriate by management. This includes both specific and general provisions.
Repurchase agreements
Involve the sale of securities for cash at a near value date and the simultaneous repurchase of the
securities for value at a later date.
Residential mortgage-backed securities
Securities created through the securitization of residential mortgage loans.
Return on common equity (ROE)
Net income, less preferred share dividends, expressed as a percentage of average common equity.
Reverse repurchase agreements
Involve the purchase of securities for cash at a near value date and the simultaneous sale of the
securities for value at a later date.
Risk
Financial institutions face a number of different risks that expose them to possible losses. These
risks include credit risk, market risk, operational risk, liquidity and funding risk, reputation
risk, regulatory and legal risk, environmental risk, insurance risk, strategic risk, competitive
risk and systemic risk.
Risk-adjusted assets
As prescribed by the OSFI guidelines and used in the calculation of risk-based capital ratios. The
face value of on-balance sheet assets is discounted using specified risk-weighting factors that
reflect the relative risk of the asset. The risk inherent in off-balance sheet instruments is also
recognized, first by determining a credit equivalent amount, and then by applying appropriate
risk-weighting factors.
Securities lending
Transactions in which the owner of a security agrees to lend it under the terms of a prearranged
contract to a borrower for a fee. The borrower must collateralize the security loan at all times.
An intermediary such as a bank often acts as agent for the owner of the security. There are two
types of securities lending arrangements: lending with and without credit or market risk
indemnification. In securities lending without indemnification, the bank bears no risk of loss. For
transactions in which the bank provides an indemnification, it bears risk of loss if the borrower
defaults and the value of the collateral declines concurrently.
Securities sold short
A transaction in which the seller sells securities and then borrows the securities in order to
deliver them to the purchaser upon settlement. At a later date, the seller buys identical
securities in the market to replace the borrowed securities.
Securitization
The process by which high-quality financial assets are packaged into newly issued securities backed
by these assets.
Special purpose entities (SPEs)
Entities that are typically organized for a single discrete purpose, have a limited life and serve
to legally isolate the financial assets held by the SPE from the selling organization. SPEs are
principally used to securitize financial and other assets in order to obtain access to funding, to
mitigate credit risk and to manage capital.
Structured investment vehicle
Managed investment vehicle that holds mainly highly rated asset-backed securities and funds itself
using the short-term commercial paper market as well as the medium-term note (MTN) market.
Subprime loans
Subprime lending is the practice of making loans to borrowers who do not qualify for the best
market interest rates because of their deficient credit history. Subprime lending
carries more risk for both lenders and borrowers due to the combination of higher interest rates,
poorer credit histories, and adverse financial situations usually associated with subprime
applicants.
Survival horizon
Measures
the length of time over which we would have sufficient funds to repay
our maturing
liabilities and finance off-balance sheet commitments if access to wholesale unsecured funding
became suddenly unavailable and liquid assets, but no portion of mortgages and loans, were
monetized.
Synthetic securitization
The transfer of risks relating to selected elements of our financial assets to unaffiliated third
parties through the use of certain financial instruments such as credit default swaps and
guarantees.
Taxable equivalent basis (teb)
Income from certain specified tax-advantaged sources is increased to a level that would make it
comparable to income from taxable sources. There is an offsetting adjustment in the tax provision,
thereby generating the same after-tax net income.
Tier 1 capital and Tier 1 capital ratio
Tier 1 capital is considered to be the most permanent in nature without creating a fixed charge
against income. As defined by the OSFI, it includes common equity, retained earnings, non-cumulative
preferred shares, and innovative capital instruments. The Tier 1 capital ratio is calculated by
dividing Tier 1 capital by risk-adjusted assets.
Total capital ratio
The percentage of risk-adjusted assets supported by capital using the guidelines of the OSFI based
on standards issued by the Bank for International Settlements and Canadian GAAP financial
information.
Trust Capital Securities (TruCS)
Transferable
trust units issued by special purpose entities, RBC Capital Trust or RBC Capital Trust
II, for the purpose of raising innovative Tier 1 capital.
Trust Subordinated Notes (TSNs)
Transferable trust units issued by RBC Subordinated Notes Trust for the purpose of raising
innovative Tier 2 capital.
U.S. GAAP
U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
Value-at-Risk (VaR)
A generally accepted risk-measurement concept that uses statistical models based on historical
information to estimate within a given level of confidence the maximum loss in market value we would
experience in our trading portfolio from an adverse one-day movement in market rates and prices.
Variable interest entity (VIE)
An entity which either does not have sufficient equity at risk to finance its activities without
additional subordinated financial support, or where the holders of the equity at risk lack the
characteristics of a controlling financial interest.
Royal Bank of Canada: Annual Report 2007
182 Glossary
From time to time, we make written or oral forward-looking statements within the meaning of certain
securities laws, including the “safe harbour” provisions of the United States Private Securities
Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and any applicable Canadian securities legislation. We may make
forward-looking statements in this annual information form, in other filings with Canadian
regulators or the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), in reports to
shareholders and in other communications. Forward-looking statements include, but are not limited
to, statements relating to our medium-term and 2008 objectives, our strategic goals and priorities
and the economic and business outlook for us, for each of our business segments and for the
Canadian, United States and international economies. Forward-looking statements are typically
identified by words such as “believe”, “expect”, “forecast”, “anticipate”, “intend”, “estimate”,
and “plan” and similar expressions of future or conditional verbs such as “will”, “may”, “should”,
“could”, or “would”.
By their very nature, forward-looking statements require us to make assumptions and are subject to
inherent risks and uncertainties, which give rise to the possibility that our predictions, forecasts,
projections, expectations or conclusions will not prove to be accurate, that our assumptions may
not be correct and that our objectives, strategic goals and priorities will not be achieved. We
caution readers not to place undue reliance on these statements as a number of important factors
could cause our actual results to differ materially from the expectations expressed in such
forward-looking statements. These factors include credit, market, operational, liquidity and
funding risks, and other risks discussed in our 2007 management’s discussion and analysis; general
business and economic conditions in Canada, the United States and other countries in which we
conduct business, including the impact from the continuing volatility in the U.S. subprime and
related markets and lack of liquidity in various of the financial markets; the impact of the
movement of the Canadian dollar relative to other currencies, particularly the U.S. dollar, British
pound and Euro; the effects of changes in government monetary and other policies; the effects of
competition in the markets in which we operate; the impact of changes in laws and regulations; judicial or regulatory judgments and legal proceedings; the accuracy and
completeness of information concerning our clients and counterparties; our ability to successfully
execute our strategies and to complete and integrate strategic acquisitions and joint ventures
successfully; changes in accounting standards, policies and estimates, including changes in our
estimates of provisions and allowances; and our ability to attract and retain key employees and
executives.
We caution that the foregoing list of important factors is not exhaustive and other factors could
also adversely affect our results. When relying on our forward-looking statements to make decisions
with respect to us, investors and others should carefully consider the foregoing factors and other
uncertainties and potential events. Unless required by law, we do not undertake to update any
forward-looking statement, whether written or oral, that may be made from time to time by us or on
our behalf.
Additional information about these and other factors can be found under the Risk management section
and the Additional risks that may affect future results section of our 2007 management’s discussion
and analysis.
Royal Bank of Canada is a Schedule I bank under the Bank Act (Canada), which constitutes its
charter. The Bank was created as Merchants Bank in 1864 and was incorporated under the “Act to
Incorporate the Merchants’ Bank of Halifax” assented to June 22, 1869. The Bank changed its name to
The Royal Bank of Canada in 1901 and to Royal Bank of Canada in 1990.
The Bank’s corporate headquarters are located at Royal Bank Plaza, 200 Bay Street, Toronto,
Ontario, Canada and its head office is located at 1 Place Ville-Marie, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
INTERCORPORATE RELATIONSHIPS
Information about intercorporate relationships with principal subsidiaries, including place of
incorporation and percentage of securities owned by the Bank, is provided in Appendix A.
GENERAL
DEVELOPMENT OF THE BUSINESS
THREE YEAR HISTORY
Over the last three years, we have been striving to achieve our vision of “Always earning the right
to be our clients’ first choice” by continuing to find new ways to generate stronger revenue growth
and streamline our organization to meet the financial needs of our clients more effectively across
all of our businesses. Broadly described as our Client First philosophy, this approach to all our
business activities took root in September 2004.
Beginning in 2005, we realigned our five previous business segments into three, structured around
client needs and geographic location: RBC Canadian Personal and Business, RBC U.S. and
International Personal and Business, and RBC Capital Markets. We also consolidated at the
enterprise level our corporate support team of Global Technology and Operations and Global
Functions, which allowed us to provide more focused, efficient and responsive support to each of
our businesses. We also divested non-strategic operations and assets, expanded our distribution
network and product offerings, sought out new revenue growth opportunities, and took other steps to
enhance our service to clients in a cost-efficient manner.
In 2006, our business strategies and actions continued to be guided by Client First and our
strategic goals which are:
•
to be the undisputed leader in financial services in Canada;
•
to build on our strengths in banking, wealth management, and capital markets in the
U.S.; and
•
to be a premier provider of selected global financial services.
We focused on enhancing client satisfaction and loyalty, while generating strong revenue and
earnings growth, continuously improving productivity, and seeking to deliver top quartile financial
performance versus our North American peer group. We focused on driving business growth, both
domestically and internationally, by leveraging and building on our corporate and geographical
strengths. In Canada, we continued to strengthen our leadership position in most major product
categories by enhancing our products and services and expanding our distribution network to better
meet our clients’ needs and deepen client relationships. In the U.S., we continued to build scale
and capability in all our major businesses
1
When we say “we”, “us”, “our”, or “RBC”, we mean Royal
Bank of Canada and its subsidiaries, as applicable. Reference to “the Bank”
means Royal Bank of Canada without its subsidiaries.
through a combination of organic growth and acquisitions. Internationally, we expanded our
distribution network, products and services, and focused our expansion in high growth markets and
regions.
In early 2007, in light of our view that global demand for wealth management products and services
will continue to increase as global economies develop and populations mature, we created a new
Wealth Management business segment consisting of businesses that directly serve the growing wealth
management needs of affluent and high net worth clients in Canada, the U.S. and outside North
America, and businesses that provide asset management and trust products through us and our
external partners. Our other three business segments were renamed Canadian Banking, U.S. &
International Banking and Capital Markets. During 2007, Client First continued to be a guiding
business philosophy as we worked to achieve the three strategic goals articulated in 2006. We
offered new and innovative products and services in Canada across all of our business segments. We
continue to expand our business through organic growth and by making a number of strategic
acquisitions internationally.
Our acquisitions and dispositions that have influenced the general development of our business over
the past three years are summarized in the following table:
BUSINESS
ACQUISITION/DISPOSITION
KEY CHARACTERISTICS
Canadian Banking
Liberty Insurance Services
Corporation (2005)
• Sold to IBM Corporation.
• Long-term
agreement with IBM to perform key
business processes for our U.S. insurance operations.
Wealth Management
J.B. Hanauer & Co. (2007)
• Acquisition expanded our retail fixed income and
wealth management capabilities in New Jersey, Florida
and Pennsylvania.
American Guaranty & Trust
Company (2006)
• Renamed RBC Trust Company (Delaware) Limited, the
acquisition has provided us with U.S. trust solutions
capability for high net worth clients, including
administering more than 1,000 personal trusts and
holding more than US$1.3 billion in trust and
investment accounts.
Abacus Financial Services
Group
Limited (2006)
• Acquisition strengthened our position in wealth
management services in the U.K. and Channel Islands,
and added assets under administration of US$41 billion.
U.S. & International
Banking
AmSouth Bank branches (2007)
• Acquisition of 39 AmSouth Bank branches marked
entry into the state of Alabama and extended our
footprint in high-growth markets in U.S. Southeast.
Flag Financial Corporation and
its bank subsidiary, Flag Bank
(2007)
• Acquisition extended our branch presence in
high-growth markets by adding 17 branches in Georgia.
RBC Dexia Investor Services
(RBC Dexia IS) (2006)
• We combined our Institutional & Investor Services
business with the Dexia Fund services business of Dexia
Banque Internationale ŕ Luxembourg in return for a 50%
joint venture interest in RBC Dexia IS.
Certain assets of RBC Mortgage
Company (2005)
• We completed the sale of certain assets to Home123
Corporation in September 2005, and the remaining
business was substantially wound down effective October31, 2006.
Capital Markets
Seasongood & Mayer, LLC (2007)
• Acquisition strengthened our franchise as one of
the leading municipal finance platforms in the U.S.
Daniels & Associates, L.P.
(2007)
• The acquisition provided us
with a U.S. mergers and acquisitions advisory firm
specializing in the communications, media and
entertainment, and technology sectors.
Carlin Financial Group (2007)
• The acquisition provided us
with a best-in-class North American electronic trade
execution platform.
We also announced our intention to either acquire, or enter into joint venture agreements with,
the following subject to regulatory approvals and other customary closing conditions:
RBTT Financial Group (RBTT)
(announced October 2007)
• Acquiring RBTT will expand our banking footprint
and create one of the most extensive retail banking
networks in the Caribbean, with a presence in 18
countries and territories across the region.
• Expected to close in the middle of calendar 2008.
Alabama National BanCorporation
(announced September 2007)
• Acquiring the parent of 10 subsidiary banks and
other affiliated businesses in Alabama, Florida and
Georgia and will add 103 branches and strengthen our
retail distribution by growing our footprint to over
450 locations in the high-growth U.S. Southeast.
• Expected to close in early calendar 2008.
Royal Fidelity Merchant Bank &
Trust Limited
(announced April 2007)
• Acquiring a 50% interest in Fidelity Merchant Bank
& Trust Limited, the Bahamas-based wholly-owned
subsidiary of Fidelity Bank & Trust International
Limited to form a joint venture to provide
certain corporate finance and advisory, investment
management, stock brokerage, share registrar and
transfer agency, pension and mutual fund administration
services.
• Expected to close the first quarter of 2008.
Wealth
Management
China Minsheng Banking Corp.,
Ltd. (China Minsheng Bank)
(announced October 2006)
• We entered into a joint venture agreement with
China Minsheng Banking Corp., Ltd. to launch a new
Chinese joint venture fund management company of which
we would own 30%.
• The joint venture company will create, manage, and
sell mutual funds in local currency to retail and
institutional investors in China.
Additional information about our three year history can also be found under the “Overview” section
beginning on page 34 of our 2007 management’s discussion and analysis, which pages are
incorporated by reference herein.
DESCRIPTION OF THE BUSINESS
GENERAL SUMMARY
The Bank and its subsidiaries operate under the master brand name RBC. We are Canada’s largest bank
as measured by assets and market capitalization and one of North America’s leading diversified
financial services companies. We provide personal and commercial banking, wealth management
services, insurance, corporate and investment banking, and transaction processing services on a
global basis. We employ more than 70,000 full- and part-time employees who serve more than 15
million personal, business, public sector and institutional clients through offices in Canada, the
U.S. and 36 countries around the world.
Canadian Banking
Canadian Banking comprises our domestic personal and business banking operations, certain retail
investment businesses and our global insurance operations. This segment has four business lines:
Personal Financial Services, Business Financial Services, Cards and Payment Solutions, and Global
Insurance.
Wealth Management
Wealth
Management comprises businesses that directly serve the growing wealth management
needs of affluent and high net worth clients in Canada, the U.S. and outside North
America, and businesses that provide asset management and trust products through RBC and external
partners. The segment has three business lines: Canadian Wealth Management, U.S. & International
Wealth Management and Global Asset Management.
U.S. & International Banking comprises our banking businesses outside Canada, including our banking
operations in the U.S. and Caribbean. In addition, this segment includes our 50% ownership in RBC
Dexia Investor Services (RBC Dexia IS). The segment has two business lines: Banking and RBC Dexia
IS.
Capital Markets
Capital Markets comprises our global wholesale banking business, which provides a wide range of
corporate and investment banking, sales and trading, research and related products and services to
corporations, public sector and institutional clients in North America, and specialized products
and services in select global markets. This segment has two business lines: Global Markets and
Global Investment Banking and Equity Markets. All other businesses, including Global Credit
and Research, are grouped under Other.
Corporate Support
Corporate Support segment activities include our global technology and operations group, corporate
treasury, finance, human resources, risk management, internal audit and other global functions, the
costs of which are largely allocated to the business segments.
Additional information about our business and each segment (including segment results) can be found
under “Overview” beginning on page 34 and under
“Business segment results” beginning on page 53 of our 2007 management’s discussion and analysis, which pages are incorporated by reference herein.
SEASONALITY
Information about seasonality is provided under “Quarterly financial information” beginning on page
51 of our 2007 management’s discussion and analysis, which pages are incorporated by reference
herein.
COMPETITION
As we enter and expand into new lines of business, our competition has grown to include other
banks, credit unions, companies that offer products and services traditionally offered by financial
institutions, investment dealers, self-directed brokers, mutual fund companies, money managers,
custody service providers, insurance companies, virtual banks and specialty financial service
providers. Key competitive factors include the range and features of financial products, pricing,
distribution, and service quality.
Canadian Banking
The competitive landscape of our Banking-related operations in the Canadian financial services
industry consists of 21 Schedule I banks (including the Bank and our five peer banks), and approximately
35 independent trust companies, 52 foreign banks (as subsidiaries or Canadian branches) and
approximately 1,300 credit unions and caisses populaires. Competition has intensified with respect
to our Banking-related operations over the years as foreign financial service providers and
non-traditional competitors (retailers, online players, etc.) enter the Canadian financial services
industry to provide credit cards, mutual funds, small business loans, consumer finance and retail
and investment services. In this competitive environment, we have top
rankings in market share for most retail product categories.
Competition for our Global Insurance operations is also intense. In Canada, we compete against
approximately 300 other insurance companies in Canada. We are one of the leading Canadian life
insurers in Canada as measured by new individual policies issued, and are also a leader in travel
insurance, creditor products and individual disability insurance. We are growing our market
position in our life, health, home and auto products. In the U.S. we compete in a fragmented market
with over 2000 active life and health carriers. We offer traditional life insurance products, as well as mortgage, life, fixed
annuities
and travel insurance. We also participate in selected international lines of business in
the global reinsurance market through our wholly-owned reinsurance subsidiaries in Barbados and
Ireland. We underwrite reinsurance and retrocession risks in defined life and non-life lines of
business with a strategy to grow these lines and to identify new business opportunities to serve
our client base.
Wealth Management
Our Canadian Wealth Management business competes with investment counselling firms, bank-owned full
service brokerage and boutique brokerages/mutual fund companies. Bank-owned providers are emerging
as the major players in these areas. Our full service brokerage business is number one in market
share based on assets under administration, and we are one of the largest providers of
discretionary investment management for affluent and high net worth clients.
Our U.S. & International Wealth Management business operates in a fragmented and extremely
competitive industry. There are more than 5,000 registered broker-dealers in the U.S., comprising
independents, global and regional players. We rank as the 7th largest full-service
broker, based on number of financial consultants, with a presence in 39 states. Competitors in
international wealth management comprise a few major banks and many small specialist operations. We
are one of the top 20 private banks in the world as measured by assets under administration, and the top trust
provider in the United Kingdom. We also have a strong presence in the United States and Latin
America and a growing business in Asia.
Our Global Asset Management business faces competition in Canada from major banks, insurance
companies and asset management organizations as well as boutique firms. Canadian fund management is
a large, mature but still relatively fragmented industry. We are one of Canada’s largest money
managers and the largest single fund company, with over 10% market share based on assets under
management. Our U.S. asset manager competes with independent asset management firms, as well as
those that are part of national/international banks, insurance companies and boutique asset
managers.
U.S. & International Banking
In retail banking, we compete against approximately 2,000 other banks, thrifts and credit unions in
the high-growth, highly competitive markets in the U.S. Southeast and now operate 350 banking
centres. We are growing market share in the U.S. as we are now ranked 5th as measured by
deposits in North Carolina, and are among the top 15 in deposits within our state banking footprint
(North Carolina, South Carolina, Virginia, Georgia, Alabama and Florida).
RBC Dexia IS ranks among the world’s top 10 global custodians. Through its offices in 15
countries, RBC Dexia IS is a global provider of investor services solutions to asset managers,
pension plans, insurance companies and financial institutions. Services provided include global
custody, fund and pension administration of client assets as well as the provision of shareholder
services, foreign exchange, securities lending and other related services.
Internationally, our Caribbean banking business is ranked in the top three in deposits in most
markets in which it operates, which are small and relatively concentrated. In the Caribbean, we
compete against banks, mortgage corporations, credit unions, trust companies, investment companies
and other deposit taking institutions in eight countries in the Caribbean and offer current
accounts, savings deposits and term deposits.
Capital Markets
Capital markets are by their nature international, and we operate via 74 offices around the world,
including New York and London. In Canada, where we are a leader in capital markets in debt, equity
and mergers and acquisitions, we compete with Canadian Schedule I banks, bulge bracket investment
banks and smaller boutique firms. In the U.S., where we target middle market companies, competition
is vigorous from boutiques, middle market and global wholesale banks, and we continue to move up
several
industry league table rankings. Globally, Capital Markets’ strengths in Canadian dollar debt
issuance and foreign exchange, mining, energy, structured products and infrastructure and public
finance puts us against global wholesale banks and dominant regional players.
GOVERNMENT
SUPERVISION AND REGULATION – CANADA
As a
Canadian Schedule I Bank, the Bank and its Canadian trust and loan and insurance
subsidiaries are federally regulated financial institutions governed by respectively, the Bank Act
(Canada) (Bank Act), the Trust and Loan Companies Act (Canada) and the Insurance Companies Act
(Canada). The activities of the Bank’s trust and loan and insurance subsidiaries are also regulated
under provincial and territorial laws in respect of their activities in the provinces and
territories.
The Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI) reports to the Minister of
Finance (the Minister) for the supervision of the Bank, as well as its Canadian trust and loan and
insurance subsidiaries. The OSFI is required, at least once a year, to examine the affairs and
business of each institution for the purpose of determining whether statutory requirements are duly
observed and the institution is in sound financial condition, and report to the Minister. The Bank
is also required to make periodic reports to the OSFI, the Minister and the Bank of Canada.
The Bank is subject to regulation under the Financial Consumer Agency of Canada Act (FCAC Act). The
Financial Consumer Agency of Canada (Agency) enforces consumer-related provisions of the federal
statutes which govern financial institutions. The Commissioner of the Agency must report to the
Minister on all matters connected with the administration of the FCAC Act and consumer provisions
of other federal statutes, including the Bank Act, Trust and Loan Companies Act and Insurance
Companies Act.
The Bank and its subsidiaries Royal Trust Corporation of Canada, The Royal Trust Company and Royal
Bank Mortgage Corporation are member institutions of the Canada Deposit Insurance Corporation
(CDIC). The CDIC insures certain deposits held at the member institutions.
Under the Bank Act, the Bank is prohibited from engaging in or carrying on any business other than
the business of banking. The Bank can provide, amongst other services, any financial services,
investment counselling services and portfolio management services, as well as provide general
insurance advice, act as a financial agent and issue and operate payment, credit or charge card
plans.
The Bank has broad powers to invest in securities, but is limited in making “substantial
investments” or in controlling certain types of entities. A “substantial investment” will arise
through direct or indirect beneficial ownership of voting shares carrying more than 10% of the
voting rights attached to all outstanding voting shares of a company, shares representing more than
25% of the shareholders’ equity in a company, or interests representing more than 25% of the
ownership interests in any other entity.
The Bank can however, make controlling, and in certain circumstances, non-controlling substantial
investments in Canadian banks, trust or loan companies, insurance companies, cooperative credit
societies and entities primarily engaged in dealing in securities; in foreign regulated entities
which are primarily engaged outside Canada in a business that if carried on in Canada would be the
business of banking, the business of a cooperative credit society, the business of insurance, the
business of providing fiduciary services or the business of dealing in securities; and in
factoring; finance; financial leasing; specialized financing and financial holding entities.
Certain substantial investments may be made only with the prior approval of the Minister or the
OSFI.
The Bank and its Canadian trust and loan and insurance subsidiaries are also required to maintain,
in relation to operations, adequate capital and adequate and appropriate forms of liquidity and the
OSFI may direct financial institutions to increase capital or to provide additional liquidity.
The Proceeds of Crime (Money Laundering) and Terrorist Financing Act (Canada) implements measures
to assist in detecting, deterring, and facilitating the investigation of money laundering and
terrorist financing offences. This Act and its associated regulations impose reporting, record
keeping and “know
your customer” obligations on the Bank, its Canadian trust and loan and insurance subsidiaries and
its broker-dealer/investment subsidiaries.
Broker-Dealer/Investment Subsidiaries
The activities of the Bank’s subsidiaries, such as RBC Dominion Securities Inc., RBC Direct
Investing Inc., Royal Mutual Funds Inc., RBC Asset Management Inc. and RBC Private Counsel Inc.,
who act as securities dealers (including investment dealers and mutual fund dealers) or advisors
(including investment counsel and portfolio managers) are regulated in Canada under provincial and
territorial securities laws (which are administered and enforced by securities regulatory
authorities) and, in some cases, by the rules of the applicable self regulatory organization (the
Investment Dealers Association of Canada for investment dealers and the Mutual Fund Dealers
Association of Canada for mutual fund dealers).
Insurance
The activities of the Bank’s regulated Canadian insurance subsidiaries, RBC Life Insurance Company
(RBC Life), RBC General Insurance Company (RBC General) and RBC Insurance Company of Canada (RICC),
are federally governed by the Insurance Companies Act and by provincial regulation in each province
and territory in which they carry on business. In addition, the Bank is federally governed by the
Bank Act for any insurance activities it is permitted to carry out. The Bank may administer,
promote and provide advice in relation to certain authorized types of insurance and is also
permitted to conduct any aspect of the business of insurance, other than the underwriting of
insurance, outside Canada and in respect of risks outside Canada. However, in Canada, the Bank may
not act as agent for any person in the placing of insurance. The Bank can promote an insurance
company, agent or broker or non-authorized types of insurance (e.g. life and home and automobile
insurance) to certain prescribed groups where the promotion takes place outside bank branches.
RBC Life, RBC General and RICC are also subject to regulation under the FCAC Act. The Agency
enforces consumer-related provisions of the federal statutes which govern financial institutions.
RBC Life is a member of Assuris which is a not for profit organization that protects Canadian life
insurance policyholders against loss of benefits due to the financial failure of a member company.
RICC and RBC General are members of the Property and Casualty Insurance Compensation Corporation
which is the corporation protecting Canadian property and casualty policyholders against loss of
benefits due to the financial failure of a member company.
GOVERNMENT SUPERVISION AND REGULATION — UNITED STATES
Banking
In the U.S., the Bank is characterized as a foreign banking organization (FBO). Generally, the
operations of an FBO and its U.S. subsidiaries and offices are subject to the same comprehensive
regulatory regime that governs the operations of U.S. domestic banking organizations. The Bank’s
U.S. businesses are subject to supervision and oversight by various U.S. authorities, including
federal and state regulators, as well as self-regulatory organizations.
In 2000, the Bank became a U.S. “financial holding company” (FHC), as authorized by the Board of
Governors of the Federal Reserve System (Federal Reserve). Pursuant to the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act,
an FHC may engage in, or acquire companies engaged in, a broader range of financial and related
activities than are permitted to banking organizations that do not maintain FHC status. To qualify
as an FHC, an FBO must meet certain capital requirements and must be deemed to be “well managed”
for U.S. bank regulatory purposes. In addition, any U.S. depository institution subsidiaries of the
FBO must also meet certain capital requirements and be deemed to be “well managed” and must have at
least a “satisfactory” rating under the Community Reinvestment Act of 1977.
In order to maintain “well managed” status for U.S. bank regulatory purposes, an FBO must have
received at least a “satisfactory” composite regulatory rating of its U.S. branch, agency and
commercial lending company operations in its last examination, the FBO’s home country supervisor
must consent to it expanding its activities in the U.S. to include activities permissible for an
FHC and the FBO’s management must meet standards comparable to those required of a U.S. bank
subsidiary of an FHC. In addition, each U.S. depository institution subsidiary of the FBO must be
deemed to be “well managed”, which requires both a “satisfactory” composite regulatory rating and a
satisfactory rating on the “management” component in its last examination.
Under the International Banking Act of 1978 (IBA), all of the Bank’s U.S. banking operations are
subject to supervision and regulation by the Federal Reserve. Under the IBA and related regulations
of the Federal Reserve, the Bank generally may not open a branch, agency or representative office
in the U.S., nor acquire more than 5% of the voting stock of any U.S. bank or bank holding company,
without notice to or prior approval of the Federal Reserve.
The Federal Reserve is the U.S. “umbrella regulator” responsible for regulatory oversight of the
whole of the Bank’s U.S. activities. The Federal Reserve consults with and obtains information from
other U.S. regulators that exercise supervisory authority over the Bank’s various U.S. operations.
Reports of financial condition and other information relevant to the Bank’s U.S. businesses are
regularly filed with the Federal Reserve.
The Bank maintains branches in New York and Miami, which are licensed and supervised as federal
branches by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (Comptroller), the U.S. supervisor of
national banks. In general, the Bank’s branches may exercise the same rights and privileges, and
are subject to the same restrictions, as would apply to a U.S. national bank at the same
location(s). However, the Bank’s branches may not take U.S. domestic retail deposits, but may
accept deposits in initial amounts of $100,000 or more. Deposits in the Bank’s branches are not
insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC).
The Comptroller examines and supervises the Bank’s U.S. branch office activities and annually
examines and assesses their operations. In addition, the Bank’s U.S. branches are required to
maintain certain liquid assets on deposit in their state(s) of residence, which deposits are
pledged to the Comptroller. Furthermore, the Bank is subject to supervisory guidance based on the
examiners’ assessment of risk management, operational controls, compliance, and asset quality.
The Bank also maintains two state-licensed agencies in Texas and state-licensed representative
offices in California (two), Connecticut, Delaware, Illinois, Texas and Washington (where it is
called an alien bureau) and a loan production office in Arizona (which is a satellite office of one
of our federal branch offices). In general, the activities conducted at the Bank’s agencies include
a broad range of banking powers, including lending, maintaining credit balances and cashing checks,
but agencies are limited in their ability to accept deposits from citizens or residents of the
United States. Agencies may have further limitations on activities based on state laws. The
activities conducted at the Bank’s representative offices are limited to representational and
administrative functions; such representative offices do not have authority to make credit
decisions and may not solicit or contract for any deposit or deposit-like liability. The Bank’s
representative offices are examined and assessed by both the Federal Reserve and state regulators
and are required to adhere to any applicable state regulations governing asset pledge or other
requirements.
Banking activities are also conducted at RBC Centura Banks, Inc. (RBC
Centura), the Bank’s U.S. banking subsidiary. RBC
Centura is a North Carolina state-chartered bank supervised by the Federal Reserve and the State of
North Carolina. Because it is a U.S. bank, RBC Centura is allowed to take retail deposits, and it
conducts retail, commercial and business banking. Deposits at RBC Centura are FDIC-insured. RBC
Centura is subject to capital requirements, dividend restrictions, limitations on investments and
subsidiaries, limitations on transactions with affiliates (including the Bank and its branches),
deposit reserve requirements and other requirements administered by the Federal Reserve and the
State of North Carolina.
Trust company activities are conducted at RBC Trust Company (Delaware) Limited (RBC Trust), the
Bank’s U.S. trust company subsidiary. RBC Trust is a Delaware trust company chartered and
supervised by the Delaware State Banking Commission and, as a subsidiary of a bank holding company,
is subject to oversight by the Federal Reserve. RBC Trust is subject to dividend restrictions,
limitations on investments and other applicable state banking law requirements.
The USA Patriot Act requires U.S. banks and foreign banks with U.S. operations to maintain
appropriate policies, procedures and controls relating to anti-money laundering compliance,
suspicious activity and currency transaction reporting and due diligence on customers to prevent,
detect and report individuals and entities involved in money laundering and the financing of
terrorism.
Securities brokerage, trading, advisory, and investment banking activities are conducted in the
following eight U.S.-registered broker-dealer subsidiaries:
•
RBC Capital Markets Corporation (RBCCM Corp.),
•
RBC Capital Markets Arbitrage, S.A. (CMA),
•
RBC Dain Rauscher Inc. (RBC Dain Rauscher),
•
RBC Daniels, L.P.,
•
RBC Professional Trader Group, LLC (PTG),
•
J.B. Hanauer & Co. (J.B. Hanauer),
•
Tamarack Distributors Inc., and
•
Hill, Thompson, Magid & Co., Inc.
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), state securities regulators, the Financial
Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) and other self-regulatory organizations regulate these
broker-dealer subsidiaries. As a member of the Philadelphia Stock Exchange, PTG is not regulated by
FINRA. Certain activities of RBCCM Corp., CMA and RBC Dain Rauscher are also subject to regulation
by the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission and the National Futures Association. Certain
activities of RBC Dain Rauscher are subject to regulation by the Municipal Securities Rulemaking
Board.
Investment Management and Other Fiduciary Activities
The Bank’s New York branches, under their fiduciary powers, conduct investment management and
custody activities for certain customers. In addition, other affiliates are involved in the
business of investment management. In many cases, these activities require that the affiliates be
registered with the SEC as investment advisers under the U.S. Investment Advisers Act of 1940
(Advisers Act). The Advisers Act and related rules regulate the registration and activities of
investment advisers. Although the regulatory regime for investment managers is similar to that of
broker-dealers, the standard of conduct is significantly higher due to the managers’ status as
fiduciaries. This status as a fiduciary limits the investment adviser’s ability to make use of
affiliates and requires that it avoid or manage and disclose conflicts of interests with respect to
the conduct of its business.
The following entities are the Bank’s subsidiaries that are registered as “investment advisers”
with the SEC:
•
RBC Dain Rauscher,
•
Liberty Capital Advisors, Inc.,
•
J.B. Hanauer,
•
RBC Alternative Asset Management Inc.,
•
Voyageur Asset Management Inc. (Voyageur),
•
Royal Bank of Canada Investment Management (USA) Limited,
Voyageur is also the adviser to several U.S. mutual funds sponsored by it. The U.S. Investment
Company Act of 1940 and related rules regulate the registration of mutual funds and the activities
of the funds’ advisers and certain other service providers.
Insurance
Liberty Life Insurance Company (Liberty Life) is subject to regulation by the State of South
Carolina (where it is organized) and the various other states in which it transacts business.
Regulation and supervision of Liberty Life includes among other things, regulatory standards
relating to: solvency; licensing of the entity and its agents; restrictions on the types of
insurance activities in which it may engage; limitations on the kinds and amounts of investments it
may make; oversight and approval of premium rates; adequacy of reserves for unearned premiums,
losses and other obligations; requirements for deposits of securities for the benefit of
policyholders; approval of policy forms; and market conduct, including the use of credit
information in underwriting as well as other underwriting, claims and sales practices.
Although the Bank is not regulated as an insurance company, it is the owner of Liberty Life through
its subsidiary RBC Insurance Holdings (USA) Inc. (RBC Insurance Holdings), which owns the capital
stock of Liberty Life. Consequently, RBC Insurance Holdings and its subsidiaries and affiliates are
subject to the insurance holding company laws and regulations of the State of South Carolina. These
provisions establish standards of fairness and reasonableness for transactions between insurers and
their affiliates, reporting requirements regarding the holding company structure and prior approval
by South Carolina’s insurance regulator of specific types of transactions between Liberty Life and
an affiliate including payment of certain dividends by Liberty Life to its parent.
ERISA and the Internal Revenue Code
The U.S. Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended (ERISA), and the related rules
regulate the activities of the financial services industry with respect to pension plan clients.
Similarly, the U.S. Internal Revenue Code and the regulations thereunder impose requirements with
respect to such clients and also individual retirement accounts (IRAs). Brokers, dealers and
investment advisers to pension plans and IRAs must conduct their business in compliance with both
ERISA and applicable tax regulations.
RISK FACTORS
A discussion of risks affecting us and our businesses appears under the headings “Risk management”
and “Additional risks that may affect future results”
beginning on page 80 and beginning on page 102,
respectively, of our 2007 management’s discussion and analysis for the year ended October 31, 2007,
which discussions are incorporated by reference herein.
ENVIRONMENTAL POLICIES
Our corporate environmental policy was first developed in 1991 and since then has been periodically
updated to reflect the changing environmental priorities of us and our stakeholders. In addition to
our corporate environmental policy, we have business-specific environmental policies, including our
Policy on Social and Environmental Review in Project Finance and our Policy on Environmental Risk
Management in Agriculture Lending. In October 2007, we launched
the RBC Environmental Blueprint (Blueprint) which
substantially updates our corporate environmental policy. The Blueprint also describes our
priorities and objectives regarding environmental sustainability, and outlines how we will approach
new and emerging environmental issues in our operations, business activities and our products and
services going forward. Additional information about our environmental policies and environmental
risks can be found under “Risk Management — Environmental
risk” on page 80 of our 2007 management’s
discussion and analysis, which page is incorporated by reference herein.
The Bank’s authorized share capital consists of an unlimited number of common shares without
nominal or par value and an unlimited number of first preferred shares and second preferred shares
without nominal or par value, issuable in series, which classes may be issued for a maximum
consideration of $20 billion and $5 billion, respectively. The following summary of share capital
is qualified in its entirety by the Bank’s by-laws and the actual terms and conditions of such
shares.
Common Shares
The holders of the Bank’s common shares are entitled to vote at all meetings of shareholders,
except meetings at which only holders of a specified class, other than common shares, or series of
shares are entitled to vote. The holders of common shares are entitled to receive dividends as and
when declared by the board of directors, subject to the preference of the preferred shares. After
payment to the holders of the preferred shares of the amount or amounts to which they may be
entitled, and after payment of all outstanding debts, the holders of the common shares will be
entitled to receive any remaining property upon liquidation, dissolution or winding-up.
Preferred Shares
First preferred shares may be issued, from time to time, in one or more series with such rights,
privileges, restrictions and conditions as the board of directors may determine, subject to the
Bank Act and to the Bank’s by-laws. Currently, Non-Cumulative First Preferred Shares Series N, W,
AA, AB, AC, AD, AE, AF and AG are outstanding.
The Non-Cumulative First Preferred Shares Series N and Series W are, subject to the consent of the
OSFI and the requirements of the Bank Act, redeemable or exchangeable by the Bank into common
shares. In addition, on and after August 24, 2008, Non-Cumulative First Preferred Shares Series N
will be convertible by the holders into common shares. The first preferred shares are entitled to
preference over the second preferred shares and common shares and over any other shares ranking
junior to the first preferred shares with respect to the payment of dividends and in the
distribution of property in the event of liquidation, dissolution or winding-up.
Second preferred shares may be issued, from time to time, in one or more series with such rights,
privileges, restrictions and conditions as the board of directors may determine, subject to the
Bank Act and to the Bank’s by-laws. There are no second preferred shares currently outstanding.
Second preferred shares would rank junior to the first preferred shares. Second preferred shares
would be entitled to preference over the common shares and over any other shares ranking junior to
the second preferred shares with respect to the payment of dividends and in the distribution of
property in the event of our liquidation, dissolution or winding-up.
Holders of the first and second preferred shares are not entitled to any voting rights as a class
except as provided under the Bank Act or the Bank’s by-laws. Under the Bank Act, the Bank may not
create any other class of shares ranking equal with or superior to a particular class of preferred
shares, increase the authorized number of, or amend the rights, privileges, restrictions or
conditions attaching to such class of preferred shares, without the approval of the holders of that
class of preferred shares.
Any approval to be given by the holders of the first and second preferred shares may be given in
writing by the holders of not less than all of the outstanding preferred shares of each class or by
a resolution carried by the affirmative vote of not less than
662/3% of the votes cast at a meeting
of holders of each class of preferred shares at which a quorum is represented. A quorum at any
meeting of holders of each class of preferred shares is 51% of the shares entitled to vote at such
meeting, except that at an adjourned meeting there is no quorum requirement.
Additional information about the Bank’s share capital can be found under the “Capital management”
section beginning on page 71 of our 2007 management’s discussion and analysis, which pages are
incorporated by reference herein.
PRIOR SALES
For information about the Bank’s issuances of common and preferred shares, as well as subordinated
debentures, since October 31, 2006, see the “Capital
management “ section beginning on page 71 of
our 2007 management’s discussion and analysis, which pages are incorporated by reference herein.
CONSTRAINTS
The Bank Act contains restrictions on the issue, transfer, acquisition, beneficial ownership and
voting of all shares of a chartered bank. The following is a summary of such restrictions.
Subject to certain exceptions contained in the Bank Act, no person may be a major shareholder of a
bank having equity of $8 billion or more (which includes the Bank). A person is a major shareholder
of a bank if:
(a)
the aggregate of the shares of any class of voting shares of the bank beneficially
owned by that person, by entities controlled by that person and by any person associated or
acting jointly or in concert with that person is more than 20% of that class of voting
shares, or
(b)
the aggregate of shares of any class of non-voting shares of the bank beneficially
owned by that person, by entities controlled by that person and by any person associated or
acting jointly or in concert with that person is more than 30% of that class of non-voting
shares.
Additionally, no person may have a significant interest in any class of shares of a bank (including
the Bank) unless the person first receives the approval of the Minister of Finance (Canada). For
purposes of the Bank Act, a person has a significant interest in a class of shares of a bank where
the aggregate of any shares of the class beneficially owned by that person, by entities controlled
by that person and by any person associated or acting jointly or in concert with that person
exceeds 10% of all of the outstanding shares of that class of shares of such bank.
The Bank Act also prohibits the registration of a transfer or issue of any shares of a Canadian
bank to any government or governmental agency of Canada or any province of Canada, or to any
government of any foreign country, or any political subdivision, or agency of any foreign country.
Under the Bank Act, the Bank cannot redeem or purchase any shares for cancellation unless the prior
consent of the OSFI has been obtained.
Each of our debt and preferred share ratings received from an approved rating agency is listed
below:
RATING AGENCY
RATING & OUTLOOK
RANK1
Moody’s Investors Service
Long-term Senior Debt – Aaa/Stable
1 of 21
(New York)
Bank Subordinated Debt – Aa1/Stable
1 of 20
Standard & Poor’s
Long-term Senior Debt – AA-/Positive
4 of 21
(New York)
Bank Subordinated Debt – A+/Positive
4 of 21
Preferred Stock – A/Positive
4 of 20
Fitch Ratings
Long-term Senior Debt – AA/Stable
3 of 24
(New York)
Bank Subordinated Debt – AA-/Stable
3 of 23
DBRS
Long-term Senior Debt – AA/Stable
3 of 26
(Toronto)
Bank Subordinated Debt – AA(low)/Stable
3 of 25
Preferred Stock – Pfd-1/Stable
2 of 16
1
Rank out of all assignable ratings for each debt/share class (in descending order
beginning with 1 as the highest).
A definition of the categories of each rating as at October 31, 2007 has been obtained from the
respective rating agency’s website and is outlined in Appendix B, and a more detailed explanation
may be obtained from the applicable rating agency.
Credit ratings, including stability or provisional ratings, (collectively, “Ratings”) are not
recommendations to purchase, sell or hold a security inasmuch as they do not comment on market
price or suitability for a particular investor. Ratings may not reflect the potential impact of all
risks on the value of securities. In addition, real or anticipated changes in the rating assigned
to a security will generally affect the market value of that security. Ratings are subject to
revision or withdrawal at any time by the rating agency. Each Rating listed in the chart above
should be evaluated independently of any other Rating applicable to our debt and preferred shares.
Additional information about Ratings is provided under “Risk management — Liquidity and funding
risk — Credit ratings” beginning on page 80 of our 2007 management’s discussion and analysis,
which pages are incorporated by reference herein.
The Bank’s common shares are listed on the Toronto Stock Exchange (TSX) in Canada, the New York
Stock Exchange (NYSE) in the U.S. and the Swiss Exchange (SWX) in Switzerland. Preferred shares are
listed on the TSX. The following table sets out the price range and trading volumes of the common
shares on the TSX and the NYSE for the periods indicated. Prices are based on the reported amounts
from the TSX Historical Data Access (HDA) and NYSE Euronext.
The following table provides the price range and trading volumes of the outstanding First Preferred
Shares Series N, W, AA, AB, AC, AD, AE, AF and AG on the TSX for the periods indicated. Prices are
based on the reported amounts from the TSX HDA.
The Bank has had an uninterrupted history of paying dividends on its common shares and on each of
its outstanding series of first preferred shares. The following table sets forth the dividends paid
or payable per share on the common shares and each outstanding series of first preferred shares in
each of the three most recently completed fiscal years.
The declaration amount and payment of future dividends will be subject to the discretion of the
Bank’s board of directors, and will be dependent upon the Bank’s results of operations, financial
condition, cash requirements and future prospectus regulatory restrictions on the payment of
dividends and other factors deemed relevant by the board of directors. The Bank’s 2007 dividend
payout ratio objective (common share dividends as a percentage of net income less preferred share
dividends) was in the range of 40-50%. In 2007, the Bank’s payout ratio of 43% met our dividend
payout ratio objective. For 2008, the Bank’s dividend payout ratio objective remains unchanged.
Senior Vice-President and Group Executive,
Sales & Distribution, IBM Corporation
John T. Ferguson
(1990)
Alberta, CAN
Founder, Chief Executive Officer and
Chairman of the Board, Princeton
Developments Ltd. and Princeton Ventures
Ltd.
The Hon. Paule Gauthier
(1991)
Quebec, CAN
Senior Partner, Stein Monast L.L.P.
Timothy J. Hearn
(2006)
Alberta, CAN
Chairman, President and Chief Executive
Officer, Imperial Oil Limited
Alice D. Laberge
(2005)
British Columbia, CAN
Company Director
Jacques Lamarre
(2003)
Quebec, CAN
President and Chief Executive Officer,
SNC-Lavalin Group Inc.
Brandt C. Louie
(2001)
British Columbia, CAN
President and Chief Executive Officer,
H.Y. Louie Co. Limited
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer,
London Drugs Limited
Michael H. McCain
(2005)
Ontario, CAN
President and Chief Executive Officer,
Maple Leaf Foods Inc.
Gordon M. Nixon
(2001)
Ontario, CAN
President and Chief Executive Officer,
Royal Bank of Canada
David P. O’Brien
(1996)
Alberta, CAN
Chairman of the Board, Royal Bank of Canada
Chairman of the Board, EnCana Corporation
Robert B. Peterson
(1992)
Ontario, CAN
Company Director
J. Pedro Reinhard
(2000)
Florida, U.S.A.
President, Reinhard & Associates
Kathleen P. Taylor
(2001)
Ontario, CAN
President and Chief Operating Officer,
Four Seasons Holdings Inc.
Victor L. Young
(1991)
Newfoundland and
Labrador, CAN
Company Director
Directors are elected annually and hold office until the next annual meeting of shareholders. Since
November 1, 2002, the directors have held the principal occupations described above, except for the
following:
Mr. George A. Cohon was Senior Chairman of McDonald’s Restaurants of Canada Limited prior to
January 2005.
Mr. Douglas T. Elix was Senior Vice-President and Group Executive, IBM Global Services of IBM
Corporation prior to May 2004.
Mr. John T. Ferguson was Chair of the Board of TransAlta Corporation prior to April 2005.
Ms. Alice D. Laberge was President and Chief Executive Officer of Fincentric Corporation prior to
July 2005, and Chief Financial Officer of Fincentric Corporation prior to December 2003.
Mr. Brandt C. Louie was Chairman of the Board of Slocan Forest Products Ltd. (which was acquired by
Canfor Corporation in April 2004) prior to March 2004.
Mr. J. Pedro Reinhard was Executive Vice-President of The Dow Chemical Company prior to December
2005 and Executive Vice-President and Chief Financial Officer of The Dow Chemical Company prior to
October 2005.
Ms. Kathleen P. Taylor was President, Worldwide Business Operations of Four Seasons Hotels Inc.
prior to January 1, 2007.
COMMITTEES OF THE BOARD
Audit Committee: R.B. Peterson (Chairman), T.J. Hearn, A.D. Laberge, J. Lamarre, J.P. Reinhard,
K.P. Taylor and V.L.Young
Conduct Review and Risk Policy Committee: J.P. Reinhard (Chairman), W.G. Beattie, P. Gauthier,
A.D. Laberge, J. Lamarre, M.H. McCain and V.L. Young
Corporate Governance and Public Policy Committeee: D.P. O’Brien (Chairman), W.G. Beattie, G.A.
Cohon, J.T. Ferguson, P. Gauthier, T.J. Hearn and B.C. Louie
Human Resources Committee: J.T. Ferguson (Chairman), G.A. Cohon, D.T. Elix, B.C. Louie, D.P.
O’Brien, R.B. Peterson and K.P. Taylor
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
The following are the Bank’s executive officers as at November 29, 2007:
Name
Province of Residence
Title
Peter Armenio
Ontario, CAN
Group Head, U.S. & International Banking
Morten N. Friis
Ontario, CAN
Chief Risk Officer
Janice R. Fukakusa
Ontario, CAN
Chief Financial Officer
M. George Lewis
Ontario, CAN
Group Head, Wealth Management
Martin J. Lippert
Ontario, CAN
Group Head, Global Technology and
Operations
Gordon M. Nixon
Ontario, CAN
President and Chief Executive Officer
Barbara G. Stymiest
Ontario, CAN
Chief Operating Officer
W. James Westlake
Ontario, CAN
Group Head, Canadian Banking
Charles M. Winograd
Ontario, CAN
Group Head, Global Capital Markets
Since November 1, 2002 the executive officers, other than Barbara G. Stymiest, have been engaged in
various responsibilities in our affairs, and those of our subsidiaries. Prior to becoming the
Bank’s Chief Operating Officer on November 1, 2004, Barbara G. Stymiest was the Chief Executive
Officer and President of TSX Inc.
To our knowledge, the directors and executive officers, as a group, beneficially own or exercise
control or direction over less than one percent (1%) of our common and preferred shares. None of
our directors or executive officers holds shares of our subsidiaries except where required for
qualification as a director of a subsidiary.
CEASE TRADE ORDERS, BANKRUPTCIES, PENALTIES OR SANCTIONS
To the best of our knowledge, no director or executive officer,
a)
is, as at November 29, 2007 or has been, within the 10 years before, a director or executive
officer of any company (including our company), that while that person was acting in that
capacity,
i)
was the subject of a cease trade or similar order or an order that denied the
relevant company access to any exemption under securities legislation, for a period of
more than 30 consecutive days,
ii)
was subject to an event that resulted, after the director or executive officer
ceased to be a director or executive officer, in the company being the subject of a
cease trade or similar order or an order that denied the relevant company access to any
exemption under securities legislation, for a period of more than 30 consecutive days,
or
iii)
or within a year of that person ceasing to act in that capacity, became
bankrupt, made a proposal under any legislation relating to bankruptcy or insolvency or
was subject to or instituted any proceedings, arrangement or compromise with creditors
or had a receiver, receiver manager or trustee appointed to hold its assets, or
b)
has, within the 10 years before November 29, 2007, become bankrupt, made a proposal under any
legislation relating to bankruptcy or insolvency, or become subject to or instituted any
proceedings, arrangement or compromise with creditors, or had a receiver, receiver manager or
trustee appointed to hold the assets of the director or officer,
Except for the following;
Mr. Cohon was a director of Loews Cineplex Entertainment Corporation when it filed a
voluntary petition to reorganize under Chapter 11 in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court on February15, 2001. Mr. Cohon is no longer a director of Loews Cineplex Entertainment Corporation.
Mr. O’Brien was a director of Air Canada when it filed for protection under the Companies’
Creditors’ Arrangement Act (CCAA) on April 1, 2003. Mr. O’Brien is no longer a director of
Air Canada.
Mr. Reinhard became a director of Dow Corning Corporation in June 2000. The company sought
protection under the reorganization provisions under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code
in 1995 and emerged from Chapter 11 bankruptcy proceedings in 2004. Mr. Reinhard is no
longer a director of Dow Corning Corporation.
Ms.
Stymiest become a director of Research in
Motion Limited (RIM) in March 2007. At that time, directors, officers
and other current and former employees of RIM were subject to a
management cease trade order (MCTO) issued by certain Canadian
securities regulators (Regulators) on November 7, 2006 in response
to RIM’s failure to file certain securities filings with the Regulators. Ms. Stymiest became subject to the MCTO on March 7, 2007,
and the MCTO was lifted on May 23, 2007 after the securities filings
were filed with the Regulators.
Ms. Taylor was a director of the T. Eaton Company when on August 20, 1999 it filed a Notice
of Intention to make a proposal to its creditors under the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act
(Canada). Ms. Taylor is no longer a director of the T. Eaton Company.
To the best of our knowledge, none of our directors or executive officers have been subject to a)
any penalties or sanctions imposed by a court relating to securities legislation or by a securities
regulatory authority or has entered into a settlement agreement with a securities regulatory
authority, or b) any other penalties or sanctions imposed by a court or regulatory body that would likely be considered
important to a reasonable investor in making an investment decision.
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
To the best of our knowledge, no director or executive officer has an existing or potential
material conflict of interest with us or any of our subsidiaries.
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS AND REGULATORY ACTIONS
In the ordinary course of our business, we are routinely involved in or parties to various ongoing,
pending and threatened legal actions and proceedings.
A description of certain legal proceedings to which we are a party appears under the heading
“Guarantees, commitments and contingencies —
Litigation” in Note 27 beginning on page 156 to our
consolidated financial statements for the year ended October 31, 2007, which pages are incorporated
by reference.
Since October 31, 2006, a) there were no penalties or sanctions imposed against us by a court
relating to securities legislation or by a securities regulatory authority, b) there were no other
penalties or sanctions imposed by a court or regulatory body against us that would likely be
considered important to a reasonable investor in making an investment decision, and c) we did not
enter into any settlement agreements with a court relating to securities legislation or with a
securities regulatory authority.1
INTEREST OF MANAGEMENT AND OTHERS IN MATERIAL TRANSACTIONS
To the best of our knowledge, there were no directors or executive officers or any associate or
affiliate of a director or executive officer with a material interest in any transaction within the
three most recently completed financial years or during the current financial year that has
materially affected us or will materially affect us.
TRANSFER AGENT AND REGISTRAR
In Canada, Computershare Trust Company of Canada is the transfer agent and registrar for our common
shares and our preferred shares. Their principal offices are in the cities of: Halifax, NS;
Montreal, QC; Toronto, ON; Winnipeg, MB; Calgary, AB; and Vancouver, BC. In the United States,
Computershare Trust Company, N.A. is the co-transfer agent located in Golden, Colorado. In the
United Kingdom, Computershare Services PLC is the co-transfer agent located in Bristol, England.
EXPERTS
Deloitte & Touche LLP, independent registered chartered accountants, prepared the Report of
Independent Registered Chartered Accountants in respect of our audited consolidated financial
statements and the Report of Independent Registered Chartered
Accountants in respect of our internal
control over financial reporting.
1
National Instrument 14-101 limits the meaning of
“securities legislation” to Canadian provincial and territorial legislation and
“securities regulatory authority” to Canadian provincial and territorial
securities regulatory authorities.
The mandate of the Audit Committee is attached as Appendix C to this annual information form.
COMPOSITION OF AUDIT COMMITTEE
The Audit Committee consists of Robert B. Peterson (Chairman), Timothy J. Hearn, Alice D. Laberge,
Jacques Lamarre, J. Pedro Reinhard, Kathleen P. Taylor and Victor L. Young. The board has
determined that each member of the Audit Committee is independent under our Director Independence
Policy, which incorporates the independence standards under applicable Canadian and U.S. laws and
regulations and none receives, directly or indirectly, any compensation from us other than ordinary
course compensation for service as a member of the board of directors and its committees or of a
board of directors of one or more of our subsidiaries. All members of the Audit Committee are
financially literate within the meaning of Multilateral Instrument 51-102 — Audit Committees and
of the Corporate Governance Standards of the New York Stock Exchange. In considering the criteria
for determining financial literacy, the board of directors looks at the ability of a director to
read and understand a balance sheet, an income statement and a cash flow statement of a financial
institution. The Audit Committee has four members, Timothy J.
Hearn, Alice D. Laberge, J. Pedro Reinhard and
Victor L. Young,
each of whom qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert” as defined by the U.S. Securities
and Exchange Commission.
RELEVANT EDUCATION AND EXPERIENCE OF AUDIT COMMITTEE MEMBERS
In addition to each member’s general business experience, the education and experience of each
Audit Committee member that is relevant to the performance of his or her responsibilities as an
Audit Committee member is as follows:
Robert B. Peterson, B.Sc., M.Sc., (Chairman) is a graduate of Queen’s University. Mr. Peterson is
retired Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Imperial Oil Limited and has been a member of our
Audit Committee since February 2000.
Timothy J. Hearn, B.Sc., is a graduate of the University of Manitoba. Mr. Hearn has been Chairman,
President and Chief Executive Officer of Imperial Oil Limited for five years and is Chairman of the
board of directors of the C.D. Howe Institute. Mr. Hearn has been a member of our Audit Committee
since March 2006.
Alice D. Laberge, B.Sc., M.B.A., earned her Bachelor of Science from the University of Alberta and
her M.B.A. from the University of British Columbia. Ms. Laberge was President and Chief Executive
Officer of Fincentric Corporation until July 2005 and prior to December 2003, was its Chief
Financial Officer. Ms. Laberge is a director of Potash Corporation of Saskatchewan and Russel
Metals Inc. and has been a member of our Audit Committee since March 2006.
Jacques Lamarre, B.A., B.Sc., is a graduate of Laval University where he earned his Bachelor of
Arts and Bachelor of Arts and Science in Civil Engineering. He has also completed Harvard
University’s Executive Development Program. Mr. Lamarre has been the President and Chief Executive
Officer of SNC-Lavalin Group Inc. for eleven years and was a director of Canadian Pacific Railway
Limited for three years. Mr. Lamarre has been a member of our Audit Committee since February 2004.
J. Pedro Reinhard, M.B.A., is a graduate of the Escola de Administracăo de Empresas Fundaçăo
Getulio Vargas (Sao Paulo) and attended post-graduate studies at the University of Cologne in
Germany and Stanford University. Mr. Reinhard is the President of Reinhard & Associates and is
retired Executive Vice-President and Chief Financial Officer of The Dow Chemical Company. Mr.
Reinhard is a director of Colgate-Palmolive Company and Sigma-Aldrich Corporation and is also a
past chairman of the CFO Council Conference Board. Mr. Reinhard has been a member of our Audit
Committee since May 2000.
Kathleen P. Taylor, B.A. (Hons.), L.L.B., M.B.A., obtained her law degree from Osgoode Hall Law
School and her M.B.A. from York University. Ms. Taylor is the President and Chief Operating Officer
of Four Seasons Holdings Inc. Ms. Taylor has been a member of our Audit Committee since November
2001.
Victor L. Young, B.Comm. (Hons.), M.B.A., earned his Bachelor of Commerce (Honours) from
Memorial University and his M.B.A. from the University of Western Ontario. From 1984 until May
2001, Mr. Young served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Fishery Products International
Limited. Mr. Young is a trustee of Bell Aliant Income Trust and
a director of BCE Inc., Imperial Oil Limited and McCain Foods Limited. Mr. Young has been a member
of our Audit Committee since March 2007.
PRE-APPROVAL POLICIES AND PROCEDURES
The Audit Committee has adopted a policy that requires pre-approval by the Audit Committee of audit
services and other services within permissible categories of non-audit services. The policy
prohibits us from engaging the auditor for “prohibited” categories of non-audit services. A copy of
our Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures can be found in Appendix D.
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED FEES
Deloitte & Touche LLP has served as one of our auditing firms since January 11, 1990 and became our
sole auditor on September 23, 2003. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP also acted as one of our two firms
of auditors from March 5, 1998 to September 23, 2003. Fees relating to the years ended October 31,2007 and October 31, 2006 to Deloitte & Touche LLP and its affiliates are $29.4 and $25.9 million,
respectively, and are detailed below. The nature of each category of fees is also described below.
2007 fees include a net adjustment of $3.0 million for amounts relating to fiscal 2006
audits. The adjustment reflects additional costs associated with audit procedures relating to
internal control over financial reporting and other matters which could not be estimated at the
time of last year’s reporting. Similarly, 2006 fees included $1.5 million for amounts relating to
fiscal 2005 audits.
Audit Fees
Audit fees were paid for professional services rendered by the auditor for the integrated audit of
our annual financial statements, including its audit of the effectiveness of our internal control
over financial reporting, and the financial statement audits of our subsidiaries. In addition,
audit fees were paid for services provided in connection with statutory and regulatory filings and
engagements.
Audit-Related Fees
Audit-related fees were paid for assurance and related services that are reasonably related to the
performance of the audit or review of our annual financial statements and are not reported under
the audit fees item above. These services consisted of:
•
special attest services not required by statute or regulation;
•
reporting on the effectiveness of internal controls as required by contract or for
business reasons;
•
accounting consultations and special audits in connection with acquisitions;
•
the audit of the financial statements of our various pension plans and charitable
foundations;
the audits of various trusts and limited partnerships; and
•
the audit of certain special purpose vehicles relating to complex structured products.
Tax Fees
Tax fees were paid for tax compliance services including the review of original and amended tax
returns, assistance with questions regarding tax audits and assistance in completing routine tax
schedules and calculations.
All Other Fees
All other fees were paid for products and services other than the audit fees, audit-related fees
and tax fees described above. These services consist of French translation of financial statements
and related continuous disclosure and other public documents containing financial information for
us and certain of our subsidiaries.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Additional information, including directors’ and officers’ remuneration and indebtedness, principal
holders of our securities, and securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans,
where applicable, is contained in the Bank’s Management Proxy Circular for the most recent annual
meeting of shareholders. Additional financial information is provided in our financial statements
and management’s discussion and analysis which are included in
our 2007 Annual Report to Shareholders for the year
ended October 31, 2007.
Copies
of this annual information form, our 2007 Annual Report to Shareholders and Management Proxy Circular in
respect of the most recent annual meeting of shareholders may be obtained from Investor Relations
at 200 Bay Street, South Tower, 14th Floor, Toronto, Ontario, M5J 2J5 (416-955-7802).
This annual information form, the financial statements and management’s discussion and analysis for
the year ended October 31, 2007, as well as additional information about us may be found on our
website at rbc.com, on SEDAR, the Canadian Securities Administrators’ website, at sedar.com, and on
the EDGAR section of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission’s website at sec.gov.
Information contained in or otherwise accessible through the websites mentioned in this annual
information form does not form a part of this annual information form. All references in this
annual information form to websites are inactive textual references and are for your information
only.
TRADEMARKS
Trademarks used in this annual information form include the LION & GLOBE Symbol, ROYAL BANK OF
CANADA, ROYAL BANK, RBC CAPITAL MARKETS, RBC CENTURA, RBC DAIN RAUSCHER and RBC
DANIELS which are trademarks of Royal Bank of
Canada used by Royal Bank of Canada and/or by its subsidiaries under license. All other trademarks
mentioned in this annual information form, which are not the property of Royal Bank of Canada, are
owned by their respective holders. RBC Dexia IS and affiliated Dexia companies are licensed users
of the RBC trademark.
Royal Bank of Canada Trust Company (Bahamas) Limited
Nassau, Bahamas
Investment Holdings (Cayman) Limited
George Town, Grand Cayman
RBC (Barbados) Funding Ltd.
St. Michael, Barbados
Royal Bank of Canada (Caribbean) Corporation
St. Michael, Barbados
Royal Bank of Canada Trust Company (Cayman) Limited
George Town, Grand Cayman
RBC Alternative Asset Management Inc.
Wilmington, Delaware, U.S.
RBC Holdings (USA) Inc. (2)
New York, New York, U.S.
RBC USA Holdco Corporation(2)
New York, New York, U.S.
RBC Dain Rauscher Corp. (2)
Minneapolis, Minnesota, U.S.
J.B. Hanauer
& Co.
Parsippany, New Jersey, U.S.
RBC Dain Rauscher Inc.
Minneapolis, Minnesota, U.S.
RBC Capital Markets Corporation
New York, New York, U.S.
RBC Daniels L.P.
Denver, Colorado, U.S.
Prism Financial Corporation
Dover, Delaware, U.S.
RBC Trust Company (Delaware) Limited
Wilmington, Delaware, U.S.
RBC
Insurance Holdings (USA) Inc.
Wilmington, Delaware, U.S.
Liberty Life Insurance Company
Greenville, South Carolina, U.S
RBC Capital Markets Arbitrage SA
Steinsel, Luxembourg
Royal Bank of Canada (Asia) Limited
Singapore, Singapore
RBC Centura Banks, Inc. (5)
Rocky Mount, North Carolina, U.S.
3,933
RBC Centura Bank
Rocky Mount, North Carolina, U.S.
RBCF L.P.
Wilmington, Delaware, U.S.
205
Royal Bank of Canada Financial Corporation
St. Michael, Barbados
3
RBC Finance B.V.
Amsterdam, Netherlands
2,319
Royal Bank of Canada Holdings (U.K.) Limited
London, England
Royal Bank of Canada Europe Limited
London, England
Royal Bank of Canada Investment Management (U.K.) Limited
London, England
Royal Bank of Canada Trust Corporation Limited
London, England
RBC Asset Management UK Limited
London, England
RBC Holdings (Channel Islands) Limited
Guernsey, Channel Islands
Royal Bank of Canada (Channel Islands) Limited
Guernsey, Channel Islands
RBC Treasury Services (C.I.) Limited
Jersey, Channel Islands
RBC Offshore Fund Managers Limited
Guernsey, Channel Islands
RBC Fund Services (Jersey) Limited
Jersey, Channel Islands
Royal Bank of Canada Investment Management (Guernsey)Limited
Guernsey, Channel Islands
Abacus Investment Services Limited
Jersey, Channel Islands
RBC Regent Fund Managers Limited
Jersey, Channel Islands
RBC Trust Company (International) Limited
Jersey, Channel Islands
Regent Capital Trust Corporation Limited
Jersey, Channel Islands
RBC Trust Company (Jersey) Limited
Jersey, Channel Islands
RBC Trustees (Guernsey) Limited
Guernsey, Channel Islands
RBC Regent Tax Consultants
Jersey, Channel Islands
RBC Wealth Planning International Limited
Jersey, Channel Islands
RBC cees Limited
Jersey, Channel Islands
RBC cees International Limited
Jersey, Channel Islands
RBC cees
Fund Managers (Jersey) Limited
Jersey, Channel Islands
Royal Bank of Canada Trust Company (Asia) Limited
Hong Kong, China
RBC Reinsurance (Ireland) Limited
Dublin, Ireland
Royal Bank of Canada (Suisse)
Geneva, Switzerland
Roycan Trust Company S.A.
Geneva, Switzerland
RBC Investment Management (Asia) Limited
Hong Kong, China
10
RBC Capital Markets (Japan) Limited
St. Michael, Barbados
18
(1)
The bank directly or indirectly owns 100% of the voting shares of each subsidiary except Finance Corporation of Bahamas Limited (75%).
(2)
Each subsidiary is incorporated or organized under the laws of the state or country in which the principal office is
situated, except for RBC Holdings (USA) Inc., RBC USA Holdco Corporation and RBC Dain Rauscher Corp., which are
incorporated under the laws of the State of Delaware, U.S., and RBCF
L.P., which is organized under the laws of the State of Nevada.
(3)
The carrying value (in millions of dollars) of voting shares is stated as the bank’s equity in such investments.
(4)
The subsidiaries have outstanding non-voting shares of which the bank, directly or indirectly, owns 100%.
(5)
RBC USA Holdco Corporation owns 4.78% and Prism Financial Corporation owns 5.17% of RBC Centura Banks, Inc.
Obligations
rated ‘Aaa’ are
judged to be of the
highest quality, with
minimal credit risk.
•
A stable rating outlook
indicates the rating
is not likely to
change.
•
Issuers (or
supporting institutions) rated
between Aaa and A3 have a superior
ability to repay short-term debt
obligations.
•
The modifier
1 indicates that the
obligation ranks in
the higher end of its
rating category.
Standard & Poor’s
•
An obligation
rated ‘AA’ has very strong capacity to meet its financial commitments. It differs from the highest-rated
obligations only in a small degree.
•
A positive rating
outlook indicates the rating may be raised.
•
An obligation
rated ‘A’ is somewhat
more susceptible to
the adverse effects
of changes in
circumstances and
economic conditions
than obligations in
higher-rated
categories. However,
the obligor’s
capacity to meet its
financial commitment
on the obligation is
still strong.
•
The addition
of a plus or minus
sign shows the
relative standing
within the major
rating categories.
Fitch Ratings
•
‘AA’ ratings
denote expectations
of very low credit
risk and are judged to be of high credit quality. They indicate very strong capacity for payment of financial
commitments. This capacity is not significantly vulnerable to
foreseeable events.
•
A stable rating outlook
indicates that a
rating is not likely
to change.
•
The modifiers
“+” or “-” may be
appended to a rating
to denote relative
status within major
rating categories.
DBRS
•
An obligation
rated ‘AA’ is of
superior credit
quality, and
protection of
interest and
principal is
considered high. In
many cases they
differ from
obligations rated ‘AAA’
only to a small
degree.
•
A stable rating outlook
indicates that a
rating is not likely
to change.
•
Preferred
shares rated Pfd-1
are of superior
credit quality, and
are supported by
entities with strong
earnings and balance
sheet
characteristics. Pfd-1 securities generally correspond with companies whose senior bonds are rated in the AAA or AA categories.
•
Each rating
category is denoted
by the categories
“high” and “low”. The
absence of either a
“high” or “low”
designation indicated
the rating is in the
middle of the
category.
Credit ratings are the current opinion of the rating agency on creditworthiness of an obligor with
respect to fixed-income obligations whose original maturity is of a medium to long term nature.
They address the possibility that a financial obligation will not be honoured as promised and
reflects both the likelihood of default and any financial loss suffered in the event of default.
Subordinated Debt
Credit ratings are the current opinion of the rating agency on creditworthiness of an obligor with
respect to a specific financial obligation and a specific class of financial obligation for a
specific financial program. Ratings take into consideration the creditworthiness of guarantors,
insurers, or other forms of credit enhancement on the obligation and takes into account the
currency in which the obligation is denominated.
Preferred Stock
Preferred stock ratings address the issuer’s capacity and willingness to pay dividends and
principal, in case of limited life preferreds, on a timely basis. They address the likelihood of
timely payment of dividends, notwithstanding the legal ability to pass on or defer a dividend
payment.
Rating Outlook
Rating Outlook assesses the potential direction of a credit rating over the intermediate to longer
term. In determining a Rating Outlook consideration is given to any changes in the economic and
fundamental business conditions. An Outlook is not necessarily a precursor of a rating change.
ROYAL BANK OF CANADA
EXTRACT FROM THE ADMINISTRATIVE RESOLUTIONS ADOPTED BY THE
BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF ROYAL BANK OF CANADA
(hereinafter referred to as the “Bank”)
2.1
Audit Committee
2.1.1
Establishment of Committee and Procedures
a)
Establishment of Committee
A committee of the directors to be known as the “Audit Committee” (hereinafter the
“Committee”) is hereby established.
b)
Composition of Committee
The Committee shall be composed of not less than five directors. Each member shall be
financially literate, as the Board of Directors interprets such qualification in its
business judgment, or must become financially literate within a reasonable period of
time after appointment to the Committee. At least one member shall have accounting or
related financial management expertise, as the Board of Directors interprets such
qualification in its business judgment.
c)
Independence of Committee Members
As required by the Bank Act, none of the members of the Committee shall be an officer or
employee of the Bank or of an affiliate of the Bank. All of the members of the
Committee shall be “unaffiliated”, as determined by regulations made under the Bank Act.
All of the members of the Committee shall be independent, as determined by director
independence standards adopted by the Board.
d)
Appointment of Committee Members
Members shall be appointed or reappointed at the annual organizational meeting of the
directors and in the normal course will serve a minimum of three years. Each member
shall continue to be a member until a successor is appointed, unless the member resigns,
is removed or ceases to be a director. The Board of Directors may fill a vacancy that
occurs in the Committee at any time.
e)
Committee Chairman and Secretary
The Board of Directors or, in the event of its failure to do so, the members of the
Committee, shall appoint or reappoint, at the annual organizational meeting of the
directors, a Chairman from among their number. The Chairman shall not be a former
employee of the Bank or of an affiliate. The Committee shall also appoint a Secretary
who need not be a director.
f)
Time and Place of Meetings
Meetings may be called by any member of the Committee, or by the external auditors. The
time and place of and the procedure at meetings shall be determined from time to time by
the members, provided that:
i)
a quorum for meetings shall be three members, a majority of whom must be “resident Canadian” except as otherwise provided by the Bank Act;
ii)
the Committee shall meet at least quarterly;
iii)
the Committee may request any officer or employee of the Bank or the
Bank’s outside counsel or external auditors to attend a meeting of the Committee or
to meet with any members of, or consultants to, the Committee;
iv)
notice of the time and place of every meeting shall be given in writing
or by telephone, facsimile, email or other electronic communication to each member
of the Committee and to the external auditors at least 24 hours prior to the time
fixed for such meeting, provided, however, that business referred to in paragraph
2.1.3.e)(iv) below may be
transacted at a meeting of which at least one hour prior notice is given as
aforesaid, and that a member may in any manner waive notice of a meeting; and
attendance of a member at a meeting is a waiver of notice of the meeting, except
where a member attends a meeting for the express purpose of objecting to the
transaction of any business on the grounds that the meeting is not lawfully called;
and
v)
a resolution in writing signed by all the members entitled to vote on
that resolution at a Committee meeting, other than a resolution of the Committee
carrying out its duties under subsection 194(3) of the Bank Act, shall be as valid
as if it had been passed at a meeting of the Committee.
g)
Reporting to the Board of Directors
i)
The Committee shall report to the Board of Directors following each meeting with respect to its activities and with such
recommendations as are deemed desirable in the circumstances.
ii)
Prior to approval by the directors, the Committee will also report to the
Board on the annual statement and returns that must be approved by the directors
under the Bank Act.
h)
Evaluation of Effectiveness and Review of Mandate
The Committee shall annually review and assess the adequacy of its mandate and evaluate
its effectiveness in fulfilling its mandate.
General Scope of Responsibilities and Purpose of the Committee
Management is responsible for the preparation, presentation and integrity of the
Bank’s financial statements and for maintaining appropriate accounting and financial
reporting principles and policies and internal controls and procedures designed to ensure
compliance with accounting standards and applicable laws and regulations.
The external auditors are responsible for planning and carrying out, in accordance with
professional standards, an audit of the Bank’s annual financial statements and reviews of
the Bank’s quarterly financial information.
The Committee’s purpose is to review the adequacy and effectiveness of these activities and
to assist the Board in its oversight of:
(i)
the integrity of the Bank’s financial statements;
(ii)
the external auditors’ qualifications and independence;
(iii)
the performance of the Bank’s internal audit function and external auditors;
(iv)
the adequacy and effectiveness of internal controls; and
(v)
the Bank’s compliance with legal and regulatory requirements.
The Committee is also responsible for preparing any report from the Committee that may be
required to be included in the Bank’s annual proxy statement or that the Board elects to
include on a voluntary basis.
The Committee shall meet every fiscal quarter, or more frequently at the discretion of the
Committee if circumstances dictate, to discuss with management the annual audited financial
statements and quarterly financial statements.
At least quarterly, the Committee shall have separate private meetings with the external
auditors, the chief internal auditor, the general counsel, the chief compliance officer and management to discuss any matters that the
Committee or these groups believe should be discussed.
In fulfilling its role, the Committee is empowered to investigate any matter with full
access to all books, records, facilities, management and employees of the Bank and the authority to
retain outside counsel or other experts for this purpose.
2.1.3
Specific Responsibilities
a)
Documents and Reports
The Committee shall review:
i)
prior to review and approval by the Board: the annual statement of the Bank,
which includes the annual audited financial statements; the quarterly financial
statements of the Bank; the annual information form; the quarterly and annual
management’s discussion and analysis; and earnings press releases;
ii)
the types of financial information and earnings guidance provided and types
of presentations made to analysts and rating agencies, and shall be satisfied that
adequate procedures are in place for the review of the Bank’s public disclosure of
financial information extracted or derived from the Bank’s financial statements and
shall periodically assess the adequacy of these procedures;
iii)
such returns as the Superintendent of Financial Institutions may specify and other periodic disclosure documentation
and reports as may be required under applicable law;
iv)
such investments and transactions that could adversely affect the
well-being of the Bank as the external auditors or any officer of the Bank may
bring to the attention of the Committee;
v)
prospectuses relating to the issuance of securities of the Bank;
vi)
an annual report on any litigation matters which could significantly affect
the financial statements; and
vii)
an annual report from the chief compliance officer on regulatory
compliance matters.
The Committee shall require management to implement and maintain appropriate
systems of internal control, including internal controls over financial reporting and
for the prevention and detection of fraud and error. The Committee shall review,
evaluate and approve those systems and meet with the chief internal auditor and with management
to assess the adequacy and effectiveness of these systems of internal control and to obtain on
a regular basis reasonable assurance that the organization is in control.
The Committee shall also receive reports from the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer
as to the existence of any significant deficiency or material weakness in the design or operation of internal
control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Bank’s ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information and as to the existence of any fraud, whether or not material,
that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Bank’s internal control over financial reporting.
c)
Internal Auditor
The Committee shall:
i)
review and concur in the appointment, replacement, reassignment or dismissal
of the chief internal auditor and review the mandate, annual audit plan, and
resources of the internal audit function;
ii)
meet with the chief internal auditor to review the results of
internal audit activities, including any significant issues reported to management
by the internal audit function and management’s responses and/or corrective
actions;
iii)
meet with the chief internal auditor to review the status of identified control weaknesses;
iv)
review representations from the chief internal auditor, based on audit work
done, on the adequacy and degree of compliance with the Bank’s systems of internal
control;
v)
review the performance, degree of independence and objectivity of the
internal audit function and adequacy of the internal audit process; and
vi)
review with the chief internal auditor any issues that may be brought
forward by the chief internal auditor, including any difficulties encountered by
the internal audit function, such as audit scope, information access, or staffing
restrictions.
d)
External Auditors
The Committee shall have the
authority and responsibility to recommend the appointment and the revocation of the
appointment of any registered public accounting firm (including the external auditors)
engaged for the purpose of preparing or issuing an audit report or performing other
audit, review or attest services, and to fix their remuneration, subject to the powers
conferred on the shareholders by the Bank Act. The Committee shall be responsible for
the oversight of the work of each such accounting firm, including resolution of
disagreements between management and the accounting firm regarding financial reporting,
and each such firm shall report directly to the Committee. The Committee shall:
i)
meet with the external auditors to review and discuss the annual audit plan,
the results of the audit, their report with respect to the annual statement and the
returns and transactions referred to in subsection 194(3) of the Bank
Act, and the
report required to be provided to the Committee by the external auditors pursuant
to Rule 2-07 of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation S-X;
ii)
have the sole authority to approve all audit engagement fees and terms, as
well as the provision and the terms of any legally permissible non-audit services
to be provided by the external auditors to the Bank, with such approval to be given
either specifically or pursuant to preapproval policies and procedures adopted by
the committee;
iii)
review with the external auditors any issues that may be brought forward
by the external auditors, including any audit problems or difficulties, such as
restrictions on their audit activities or access to requested information, and
management’s response;
iv)
annually review with the external auditors their qualifications,
independence and objectivity, including formal written statements delineating all
relationships between the external auditors and the Bank that may impact such
independence and objectivity;
v)
discuss with the external auditors and with management the
annual audited financial statements and quarterly financial statements, including
the disclosures contained in the annual and quarterly management’s discussion and
analysis;
vi)
review hiring policies concerning partners, employees and former partners
and employees of the external auditors;
vii)
review and evaluate the qualifications, performance and independence of
the lead partner of the external auditors and discuss the timing and process for
implementing the rotation of the lead audit partner, the concurring audit partners
and any other active audit engagement team partner;
at least annually, obtain and review a report by the external auditors
describing: the external auditors’ internal quality-control procedures; any
material issues raised by the most recent internal quality-control review, or peer
review, of the external auditors, or by any inquiry or investigation by
governmental or professional authorities, within the preceding five years,
respecting one or more independent audits carried out by the external auditors, and
any steps taken to deal with any such issues; and
ix)
take into account the opinions of management and the Bank’s internal
auditors in assessing the qualifications, performance and independence of the
external auditors.
e)
Liquidity, Funding and Capital Management
The Committee:
i)
shall review and approve at least once a year the liquidity and funding
management policies including contingency plans as well as capital management policies recommended by management;
ii)
shall review on a regular basis the liquidity, funding and capital position
and liquidity, funding and capital management processes;
iii)
shall obtain on a regular basis reasonable assurance that the Bank’s
liquidity and funding management policies and capital management policies are being
adhered to;
iv)
as provided in the relevant standing resolutions of the Board of Directors,
may designate and authorize the issue of First Preferred Shares and the issue of
securities qualifying as Tier 2A capital under capital adequacy guidelines issued
by the Superintendent of Financial Institutions; and
v)
in connection with the exercise of the power delegated to senior management
to authorize and approve issues of subordinated indebtedness of the Bank, shall
review and approve the Draft Securities Disclosure Document as provided in the
relevant standing resolution of the Board of Directors.
f)
Other
i)
The Committee shall discuss major issues regarding accounting principles and
financial statement presentations, including significant changes in the Bank’s
selection or application of accounting principles, analyses prepared by management
or the external auditors setting forth significant financial reporting issues and
judgments made in connection with the preparation of the financial statements,
including analyses of the effect on the financial statements of alternative methods
of applying Canadian or U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, of
regulatory and accounting initiatives and of off-balance sheet structures;
ii)
The Committee shall establish procedures for the receipt, retention,
treatment and resolution of complaints received by the Bank regarding accounting,
internal accounting controls or auditing matters, as well as procedures for the
confidential and anonymous submission of concerns
regarding accounting or auditing matters;
iii)
The Committee shall review and discuss any reports concerning material
violations submitted to it by Bank attorneys or counsel pursuant to the
attorney professional responsibility rules of the U.S. Securities and Exchange
Commission, the Bank’s attorney reporting policy, or otherwise;
iv)
The Committee shall, as appropriate, obtain at the expense of the Bank
advice and assistance from independent legal, accounting or other advisors;
v)
The Committee shall discuss the major financial risk exposures of the Bank
and the steps management has taken to monitor and control such exposures; and
vi)
Subject to the laws applicable to the subsidiary, the Committee may perform
for and on behalf of a subsidiary the functions of an audit committee of the
subsidiary.
The mandate of the Audit Committee established by the board of directors confers on the
Committee the authority and responsibility (among other things) to pre-approve all audit and
any legally permissible non-audit services to be provided by the external auditors and all
audit, review and attest services provided by any other public accounting firm, with such
approval to be given either specifically or pursuant to pre-approval policies and procedures
adopted by the Committee.
Purpose
2.
These Policies and Procedures are intended:
a)
to specify the methods by which the Audit Committee may pre-approve the provision of
audit, review and attest services by any public accounting firm to the Bank and its
subsidiaries;
b)
to specify the methods by which the Audit Committee may pre-approve the provision of
non-audit services to the Bank and its subsidiaries by the Bank’s external auditors and
their affiliates (the “auditors”) that do not impair the independence of the auditors;
c)
to set forth procedures designed to ensure that any services to be provided by the
auditors and that any audit, review or attestation services to be performed by any other
public accounting firm have been properly authorized and pre-approved under the authority
of the Audit Committee, and that the Committee is promptly informed of each service; and
d)
to ensure that the Audit Committee’s responsibilities under applicable law are not
delegated to management.
Required Approval of Audit and Non-Audit Services
3.
The Audit Committee shall pre-approve all engagements of the auditors by:
The Audit Committee shall pre-approve engagements of any public accounting firm to provide
audit, review or attest services to:
a)
the Bank; or
b)
any subsidiary.
5.
The Audit Committee shall evidence its pre-approval by resolution of the Committee or through
the exercise of delegated authority in accordance with these Policies and Procedures.
6.
“Subsidiary” has the meaning set forth in Rule 1-02(x) of the U.S. Securities and Exchange
Commission’s Regulation S-X. The Bank considers any entity that the Bank is required to
consolidate under U.S. GAAP to be a “subsidiary”.
7.
For the purpose of these Policies and Procedures and any pre-approval:
a)
“Audit services” include services that are a necessary part of the audit process and
any activity that is a necessary procedure used by the accountant in reaching an opinion on
the financial statements as is required under applicable auditing standards (“AAS”),
including technical reviews to reach an audit judgment on complex accounting issues;
b)
The term “audit services” is broader than those services strictly required to perform
an audit pursuant to AAS and include such services as:
i)
the issuance of comfort letters and consents in connection with offerings of
securities;
ii)
the performance of domestic and foreign statutory audits;
iii)
attest services required by statute or regulation; and
iv)
assistance with and review of documents filed with the Office of the
Superintendent of Financial Institutions, Canadian securities administrators, the
Securities and Exchange Commission, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve
Board and other regulators having jurisdiction over the activities of the Bank and its
subsidiaries, and responding to comments from such regulators;
c)
“Audit-related” services are assurance (e.g., due diligence services) and related
services traditionally performed by the principal accountant and that are reasonably
related to the performance of the audit or review of financial statements and not
categorized under “audit fees” for disclosure purposes.
“Audit-related services” include:
i)
employee benefit plan audits, including audits of employee pension plans,
ii)
due diligence related to mergers and acquisitions,
iii)
consultations and audits in connection with acquisitions, including evaluating
the accounting treatment for proposed transactions;
iv)
internal control reviews;
v)
attest services not required by statute or regulation; and
vi)
consultations regarding financial accounting and reporting standards.
Non-financial operational audits are not “audit-related” services;
d)
“Review services” are services applied to unaudited financial statements and consist of
the inquiry and analytical procedures that provide the accountant with a reasonable basis
for expressing limited assurance that there are no material modifications that should be
made to financial statements for them to be in conformity with GAAP or, if applicable, any
other comprehensive basis of accounting;
e)
“Attest” services are those engagements where the accountant issues an examination, a
review, or an agreed-upon procedures report on a subject matter, or an assertion about the
subject matter that is the responsibility of another party. Examples of the subject matter
of an “attest” engagement include: examinations (i.e., audits) of financial forecasts and
projections; reviews of pro-forma financial information; reporting on a company’s internal
control over financial reporting; and examinations of compliance with contractual
arrangements or laws and regulations.
Delegation
8.
The Audit Committee may from time to time delegate to one or more of its members who are
“independent” (within the meanings of applicable law and the rules or policies of a securities
commission having jurisdiction, and the NYSE) the power to pre-approve from time to time:
a)
audit, review or attest services to be provided by any public accounting firm
(including the auditors) that have not been otherwise approved by the Committee;
b)
permissible non-audit services to be provided by the auditors that have not otherwise
been approved by the Committee, and
c)
changes in the scope of pre-approved engagements and the maximum estimated fees for
engagements that have been pre-approved by the Committee.
9.
The member(s) exercising such delegated authority must report at the next regularly scheduled
meeting of the Audit Committee any services that were pre-approved under this delegated
authority since the date of the last regularly scheduled meeting.
10.
The member(s) exercising delegated authority may evidence his or her approval by signing an
instrument in writing that describes the engagement with reasonable specificity, or by signing
an engagement letter containing such a description.
11.
In addition, member(s) exercising delegated authority may pre-approve an engagement orally,
if any such oral approval is promptly confirmed in writing. Such written confirmation may be
given by fax or e-mail and must describe the engagement with reasonable specificity.
Responsibilities of External Auditors
12.
To support the independence process, the external auditors shall:
a)
confirm in engagement letters that performance of the work will not impair
independence;
satisfy the Audit Committee that they have in place comprehensive internal policies and
processes to ensure adherence, world-wide, to independence requirements, including robust
monitoring and communications;
c)
provide regular communication and confirmation to the Committee on independence;
d)
provide for Committee approval, in connection with each annual audit engagement, a
detailed scope of services outlining each individual audit to be performed and a detailed
description of audit-related services;
e)
utilize the assigned tracking numbers in all fee billings and correspondence and
provide detailed, quarterly fee reporting.
f)
maintain certification by the Canadian Public Accountability Board and registration
with the U.S. Public Company Accounting Oversight Board; and
g)
review their partner rotation plan and advise the Committee on an annual basis.
Engagements
13.
The Audit Committee will not, as a general rule, pre-approve a service more than one year
prior to the time at which it is anticipated that the firm of accountants will be engaged to
provide the service.
14.
Engagements will not be considered to be revolving in nature and may not operate from
year-to-year.
15.
All audit and non-audit services to be provided by the auditors and all audit, review or
attest services to be provided by any public accounting firm shall be provided pursuant to an
engagement letter that shall:
a)
be in writing and signed by the auditors or public accounting firm;
b)
specify the particular services to be provided;
c)
specify the period in which the services will be performed;
d)
specify the maximum total fees to be paid; and
e)
in the case of engagements of the auditors, include a confirmation by the auditors that
the services are not within a category of services the provision of which would impair
their independence under applicable law and Canadian and U.S. generally accepted auditing
standards.
16.
Management shall, before signing and delivering an engagement letter on behalf of the Bank or
a subsidiary and before authorizing the commencement of an engagement:
a)
obtain an engagement letter in accordance with the foregoing;
confirm that the services are described in the engagement letter accurately and with
reasonable specificity;
c)
obtain confirmation from the auditors that they have conducted an analysis that
supports their conclusion that performance of the services will not impair their
independence;
d)
with respect to engagements for the provision of services other than audit and
audit-related services, obtain confirmation from legal counsel for the Bank that
performance of the services will not impair independence; and
e)
verify that the performance of the services has been specifically approved by the Audit
Committee or a member in accordance with authority delegated by the Committee.
All engagement letters entered into pursuant to these Policies and Procedures shall be made
available to the Audit Committee.
Tax Services
17.
The Audit Committee, and any member in the exercise of delegated power, shall consider the
provision of tax services by the auditors on an engagement-by-engagement basis.
18.
The Audit Committee shall not pre-approve, and any member of the Audit Committee may not
exercise delegated power to engage the auditors to provide, tax services to the Bank or a
subsidiary:
a)
to represent the Bank or a subsidiary before a tax or other court; or
b)
if the provision of the services would be prohibited, as prescribed by paragraph 20 of
these Policies and Procedures.
Other Non-Audit Services (Including Business Recovery Services)
19.
The Audit Committee, and any member in the exercise of delegated power, shall consider the
provision of other non-audit services (non-audit services other than audit-related services
and tax services, and including business recovery services) by the auditors on an
engagement-by-engagement basis.
Prohibited Services
20.
The Audit Committee shall not pre-approve, and any member may not exercise delegated power to
engage the auditors to provide any services, including tax services or business recovery
services, that involve the auditors performing any of the non-audit services set forth in
paragraph (c)(4) of Rule 2-01 of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation S-X,
which include:
a.
providing bookkeeping or other services related to the accounting records or financial
statements of the Bank or any of its subsidiaries,
b.
providing financial information systems design and implementation to the Bank or any of
its subsidiaries,
c.
providing actuarial services to the Bank or any of its subsidiaries,
providing internal audit outsourcing services to the Bank or any of its subsidiaries,
e.
providing human resources services to the Bank or any of its subsidiaries,
f.
providing broker-dealer, investment adviser, or investment banking services to the Bank
or any of its subsidiaries,
g.
functioning in the role of management for the Bank or any of its subsidiaries,
h.
auditing their own work in relation to the Bank or any of its subsidiaries,
i.
providing appraisal or valuation services, contribution in kind reports or fairness
opinions to the Bank or any of its subsidiaries,
j.
serving in an advocacy role for the Bank or any of its subsidiaries,
k.
providing legal services to the Bank or any of its subsidiaries,
l.
providing services that fall within the category of “expert” services that are
prohibited by applicable law to the Bank or any of its subsidiaries, or
m.
providing services to the Bank or any of its subsidiaries that would otherwise
compromise their independence under applicable regulatory guidance.
For the purposes of the Prohibited Services listed in this Section 20 above, a “subsidiary”
includes any entity for which the Bank equity accounts for purposes of U.S. GAAP that is material
to the Bank. Therefore, the Audit Committee is not permitted to pre-approve the provision of the
prohibited services listed above by the auditors to these entities.
Timely Reporting to the Audit Committee
21.
Management shall provide a quarterly written report to the Audit Committee of each service
performed and fees, at the scheduled meeting of the Committee held following the end of each
fiscal quarter end.
No Delegation to Management
22.
Nothing in these Policies and Procedures shall be interpreted as a delegation to management
of the Audit Committee’s responsibilities under applicable law.
Effective Date
23.
These updated Policies and Procedures are effective as and from October 18, 2006.
Disclosure
24.
The Bank shall disclose these Policies and Procedures in its periodic filings, as required by
applicable law.
Review
25.
The Audit Committee shall review and reassess the adequacy of these Policies and Procedures
on a bi-annual basis.
We have read the directors’ circular dated February 8,2008, relating to the amalgamation involving RBTT Financial
Holdings Limited and Royal Bank of Canada (the
“Bank”). We have complied with Canadian generally
accepted standards for an auditor’s involvement with
offering documents.
We consent to the use in the above-mentioned directors’
circular of our report to the shareholders of the Bank on the
consolidated balance sheets of the Bank as at October 31,2007 and 2006 and the consolidated statements of income,
comprehensive income, changes in shareholders’ equity and
cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended
October 31, 2007. Our report is dated November 29,2007.