Quarterly Report — Form 10-Q — Sect. 13 / 15(d) – SEA’34 Filing Table of Contents
Document/ExhibitDescriptionPagesSize 1: 10-Q Quarterly Report HTML 302K
2: EX-10.1 Material Contract -- exhibit101 HTML 42K
3: EX-10.2 Material Contract -- exhibit102 HTML 43K
4: EX-15.1 Letter re: Unaudited Interim Financial Info HTML 19K
5: EX-31.1 Certification -- §302 - SOA'02 HTML 26K
6: EX-31.2 Certification -- §302 - SOA'02 HTML 26K
7: EX-32.1 Certification -- §906 - SOA'02 HTML 20K
8: EX-32.2 Certification -- §906 - SOA'02 HTML 20K
15: R1 Document and Entity Information HTML 39K
16: R2 Consolidated Balance Sheets (Unaudited) HTML 110K
17: R3 Consolidated Balance Sheets (Parenthetical) HTML 43K
18: R4 Consolidated Statements of Income (Unaudited) HTML 73K
19: R5 Consolidated Statements of Income (Parenthetical) HTML 22K
20: R6 Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income HTML 32K
(Unaudited)
21: R7 Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity HTML 45K
(Unaudited)
22: R8 Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited) HTML 97K
23: R9 Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows HTML 21K
(Parenthetical)
24: R10 Organization HTML 21K
25: R11 Basis of Presentation HTML 22K
26: R12 Recently Issued Accounting Literature HTML 32K
27: R13 Revenue Recognition HTML 43K
28: R14 Rego Park II Loan Participation HTML 21K
29: R15 Related Party Transactions HTML 42K
30: R16 Marketable Securities HTML 25K
31: R17 Discontinued Operations HTML 24K
32: R18 Significant Tenant HTML 22K
33: R19 Mortgages Payable HTML 50K
34: R20 Fair Value Measurements HTML 80K
35: R21 Commitments and Contingencies HTML 32K
36: R22 Earnings Per Share HTML 38K
37: R23 Basis of Presentation (Policies) HTML 58K
38: R24 Revenue Recognition (Tables) HTML 37K
39: R25 Related Party Transactions (Tables) HTML 31K
40: R26 Mortgages Payable (Tables) HTML 54K
41: R27 Fair Value Measurements (Tables) HTML 79K
42: R28 Earnings Per Share (Tables) HTML 39K
43: R29 Organization - Additional Information (Detail) HTML 21K
44: R30 Basis of Presentation - Additional Information HTML 20K
(Detail)
45: R31 Recently Issued Accounting Literature - Additional HTML 33K
Information (Detail)
46: R32 Revenue Recognition - Disaggregation of Revenue HTML 35K
(Details)
47: R33 Rego Park II Loan Participation - Additional HTML 34K
Information (Detail)
48: R34 Related Party Transactions - Additional HTML 87K
Information (Detail)
49: R35 Related Party Transactions - Summary of Fees to HTML 30K
Vornado (Detail)
50: R36 Marketable Securities - Additional Information HTML 36K
(Detail)
51: R37 Discontinued Operations - Narrative (Details) HTML 23K
52: R38 Significant Tenant - Additional Information HTML 31K
(Detail)
53: R39 Mortgages Payable - Additional Information HTML 38K
(Detail)
54: R40 Mortgages Payable - Summary of Outstanding HTML 47K
Mortgages Payable (Detail)
55: R41 Mortgages Payable - Summary of Outstanding HTML 28K
Mortgages Payable Narrative (Detail)
56: R42 Fair Value Measurements - Financial Assets and HTML 42K
Liabilities Measured at Fair Value (Detail)
57: R43 Fair Value Measurements - Financial Assets and HTML 37K
Liabilities Not Measured at Fair Value (Detail)
58: R44 Commitments and Contingencies - Additional HTML 109K
Information (Detail)
59: R45 Earnings Per Share - Schedule of Earnings Per HTML 39K
Share, Basic and Diluted (Detail)
61: XML IDEA XML File -- Filing Summary XML 99K
60: EXCEL IDEA Workbook of Financial Reports XLSX 52K
9: EX-101.INS XBRL Instance -- alx-20180331 XML 976K
11: EX-101.CAL XBRL Calculations -- alx-20180331_cal XML 138K
12: EX-101.DEF XBRL Definitions -- alx-20180331_def XML 445K
13: EX-101.LAB XBRL Labels -- alx-20180331_lab XML 1.06M
14: EX-101.PRE XBRL Presentations -- alx-20180331_pre XML 686K
10: EX-101.SCH XBRL Schema -- alx-20180331 XSD 125K
62: ZIP XBRL Zipped Folder -- 0000003499-18-000011-xbrl Zip 136K
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
N/A
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. þ Yes ¨ No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (Section 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). þ
Yes ¨ No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,”“accelerated filer,”“smaller reporting company” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
þLarge Accelerated Filer
¨Accelerated Filer
¨Non-Accelerated Filer (Do not check if smaller
reporting company)
¨Smaller Reporting Company
¨Emerging Growth Company
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
¨ Yes þ No
As of April 27, 2018, there were 5,107,290 shares of common stock, par value $1 per share, outstanding.
Alexander’s, Inc. (NYSE: ALX) is a real estate investment trust (“REIT”), incorporated in Delaware, engaged in leasing, managing, developing and redeveloping its properties. All references to “we,”“us,”“our,”“Company” and “Alexander’s” refer to Alexander’s, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries. We are managed by, and our properties are leased and developed by, Vornado Realty Trust (“Vornado”)
(NYSE: VNO). We have seven properties in the greater New York City metropolitan area.
2.
Basis of Presentation
The accompanying consolidated financial statements are unaudited and include the accounts of Alexander’s and its consolidated subsidiaries. All intercompany amounts have been eliminated. In our opinion, all adjustments (which include only normal recurring adjustments) necessary to present fairly the financial position, results of operations
and changes in cash flows have been made. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) have been condensed or omitted. These condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the instructions to Form 10-Q of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) and should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017, as filed with the SEC.
We have made estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of
revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results could differ from those estimates. The results of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2018 are not necessarily indicative of the operating results for the full year.
We operate in one reportable segment.
3.
Recently Issued Accounting Literature
In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued an update (“ASU
2014-09”) establishing Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (“ASC 606”). ASU 2014-09, as amended by subsequent ASUs on the topic, establishes a single comprehensive model for entities to use in accounting for revenue arising from contracts with customers and supersedes most of the existing revenue recognition guidance. This standard, which is effective for interim and annual reporting periods in fiscal years that begin after December 15, 2017, requires an entity to recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled
in exchange for those goods or services and also requires certain additional disclosures (see Note 4). We adopted this standard effective January 1, 2018 using the modified retrospective approach, which allows us to apply the new standard to all existing contracts not yet completed as of the effective date and record a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings as of the beginning of the fiscal year of adoption. The adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In January 2016, the FASB issued an update (“ASU 2016-01”) Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities to ASC Topic 825, Financial
Instruments (“ASC 825”). ASU 2016-01 amends certain aspects of recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosure of financial instruments. ASU 2016-01 is effective for interim and annual reporting periods in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017. We adopted this update effective January 1, 2018 using the modified retrospective approach. While the adoption of this update requires us to continue to measure “marketable securities” at fair value at each reporting date, the changes in fair value will be recognized in current period earnings as opposed to “other comprehensive income (loss).” As a result, on January 1, 2018 we recorded an increase to retained earnings of $5,156,000 to recognize the unrealized gains previously
recorded within “accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income.” For the three months ended March 31, 2018 we recorded a decrease in the fair value of our marketable securities of $5,170,000, resulting from The Macerich Company’s (“Macerich”) closing share price of $56.02 as of March 31, 2018, compared to $65.68 as of December 31, 2017.
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(UNAUDITED)
3.
Recently Issued Accounting Literature - continued
In February 2016, the FASB issued an update (“ASU 2016-02”) establishing ASC Topic 842, Leases, which sets out the principles for the recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosure of leases for both lessees and lessors. ASU 2016-02 requires lessees to apply a dual approach, classifying leases as either finance or operating leases based on the principle of whether or not the lease is effectively a financed purchase. Lessees are required
to record a right-of-use asset and a lease liability for all leases with a term greater than 12 months. Leases with a term of 12 months or less will be accounted for similar to existing guidance for operating leases. Lessees will recognize expense based on the effective interest method for finance leases or on a straight-line basis for operating leases. The accounting applied by the lessor is largely unchanged from that applied under the existing lease standard. We are currently evaluating the overall impact of the adoption of ASU 2016-02 on our consolidated financial statements and believe that the standard will more significantly impact the accounting for leases in which we are a lessee. We will be required to record a right-of-use asset and lease liability for our Flushing property ground lease, equal to the present value of the remaining minimum lease payments, and will continue to recognize expense on a straight-line basis upon adoption of this standard. ASU 2016-02
is effective for interim and annual reporting periods in fiscal years that begin after December 15, 2018, with early adoption permitted. We will adopt this standard effective January 1, 2019 and will elect to use the practical expedients provided by this standard.
In February 2017, the FASB issued an update (“ASU 2017-05”) Clarifying the Scope of Asset Derecognition Guidance and Accounting for Partial Sales of Nonfinancial Assets to ASC Subtopic 610-20, Other Income-Gains and Losses from the Derecognition of Nonfinancial Assets. ASU 2017-05 clarifies the scope of recently established guidance on nonfinancial asset derecognition, as well as the accounting for partial sales of nonfinancial
assets. This update conforms the derecognition guidance on nonfinancial assets with the model for transactions in ASC 606. ASU 2017-05 is effective for interim and annual reporting periods in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017. We adopted this update effective January 1, 2018 using the modified retrospective approach to all contracts not yet completed. The adoption of this update did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In August 2017, the FASB issued an update (“ASU 2017-12”) Targeted Improvements to Accounting for Hedging Activities to ASC Topic 815, Derivatives and
Hedging (“ASC 815”). ASU 2017-12 amends the hedge accounting recognition and presentation requirements in ASC 815. The update is intended to more closely align hedge accounting with companies’ risk management strategies, simplify the application of hedge accounting and increase transparency as to the scope and results of hedge programs. The update ASU 2017-12 is effective for interim and annual reporting periods in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, with early adoption permitted. We elected to early adopt ASU 2017-12 effective January 1, 2018 using the modified retrospective approach. The adoption of this update did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(UNAUDITED)
4.
Revenue Recognition
Our revenues consist of property rentals and expense reimbursements. We have the following revenue sources and revenue recognition policies:
•
Base Rent is revenue arising from tenant leases. These rents are recognized
over the non-cancelable term of the related leases on a straight-line basis, which includes the effects of rent steps and rent abatements. We commence rental revenue recognition when the tenant takes possession of the leased space and the leased space is substantially ready for its intended use. In addition, in circumstances where we provide a tenant improvement allowance for improvements that are owned by the tenant, we recognize the allowance as a reduction of rental revenue on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease.
•
Percentage Rent is revenue arising from retail tenant leases that is contingent upon the sales of tenants exceeding defined thresholds. These rents are recognized only after the contingency has been removed (i.e.,
when tenant sales thresholds have been achieved).
•
Parking Revenue arising from the rental of parking spaces at our properties. This income is recognized as the services are provided.
•
Operating Expense Reimbursements is revenue arising from tenant leases which provide for the recovery of all or a portion of the operating expenses and real estate taxes of our properties. Revenue is recognized in the same period as the related expenses are incurred.
•
Tenant
Services is revenue arising from sub-metered electric, elevator and other services provided to tenants at their request. This revenue is recognized as the services are transferred.
Parking revenue and tenant services income represent revenue recognized from contracts with customers and are recognized in accordance with ASC 606. Base rent, percentage rent and operating expense reimbursements are recognized in accordance with ASC Topic 840, Leases.
The following is a summary of revenue sources for the three months ended March 31, 2018 and 2017.
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(UNAUDITED)
5.
Rego Park II Loan Participation
On July 28, 2017, we entered into a participation and servicing agreement with the lender on our Rego Park II shopping center loan, which matures on November 30, 2018. We paid $200,000,000 to participate in the loan and are entitled to interest of LIBOR plus 1.60% (3.49%
as of March 31, 2018). The investment is presented as “Rego Park II loan participation” on our consolidated balance sheets as of March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017, and interest earned is recognized as “interest and other income, net” in our consolidated statement of income for the three months ended March 31, 2018.
6.
Related Party Transactions
Vornado
As
of March 31, 2018, Vornado owned 32.4% of our outstanding common stock. We are managed by, and our properties are leased and developed by, Vornado, pursuant to the agreements described below, which expire in March of each year and are automatically renewable.
Management and Development Agreements
We pay Vornado an annual management fee equal to the sum of (i) $2,800,000, (ii) 2% of gross revenue from the Rego Park II shopping center, (iii) $0.50 per square foot of the tenant-occupied office and retail space at 731 Lexington Avenue and (iv) $306,000, escalating
at 3% per annum, for managing the common area of 731 Lexington Avenue. Vornado is also entitled to a development fee equal to 6% of development costs, as defined.
Leasing and Other Agreements
Vornado also provides us with leasing services for a fee of 3% of rent for the first ten years of a lease term, 2% of rent for the eleventh through the twentieth year of a lease term, and 1% of rent for the twenty-first through thirtieth year of a lease term, subject to the payment of rents by tenants. In the event third-party real estate brokers are used, the fees to Vornado increase by 1% and Vornado is responsible for
the fees to the third-party real estate brokers.
Vornado is also entitled to a commission upon the sale of any of our assets equal to 3% of gross proceeds, as defined, for asset sales less than $50,000,000 and 1% of gross proceeds, as defined, for asset sales of $50,000,000 or more.
We also have agreements with Building Maintenance Services, a wholly owned subsidiary of Vornado, to supervise (i) cleaning, engineering and security services at our 731 Lexington Avenue property and (ii) security services at our Rego Park I and Rego Park II properties and The Alexander apartment tower.
The following is a summary of fees to Vornado under the various agreements
discussed above.
Three Months Ended March 31,
(Amounts in thousands)
2018
2017
Company
management fees
$
700
$
700
Development fees
7
28
Leasing
fees
—
11
Property management, cleaning, engineering and security fees
1,026
988
$
1,733
$
1,727
As
of March 31, 2018, the amounts due to Vornado were $27,000 for development fees and $691,000 for management, property management, cleaning, engineering and security fees. As of December 31, 2017, the amounts due to Vornado were $1,811,000 for leasing fees; $658,000 for management, property management, cleaning, engineering and security fees; and $21,000 for development fees.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(UNAUDITED)
6.
Related Party Transactions - continued
Toys “R” Us, Inc. (“Toys”)
Our affiliate, Vornado, owns 32.5% of Toys. Joseph Macnow, Vornado’s Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer and Wendy A. Silverstein, a member of our Board of Directors, represent Vornado as members of Toys’ Board of Directors. Toys leases 47,000
square feet of retail space at our Rego Park II shopping center ($2,600,000 of annual revenue). On September 18, 2017, Toys filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy relief. On March 15, 2018, Toys sought authorization to wind down U.S. operations, including closing U.S. stores and liquidating all U.S. inventory, which relief was granted on an interim basis on March 22, 2018. There are $588,000 of tenant improvements, $215,000 of unamortized deferred leasing costs and $500,000 of receivables arising from the straight-lining of rent on our consolidated balance sheet related to the Toys lease as of March 31,
2018. Pursuant to the bankruptcy court proceedings, Toys plans to close its store at our Rego Park II property by June 30, 2018. Consequently, we are accelerating depreciation and amortization of the remaining balances of tenant improvements and deferred leasing costs to the second quarter ending June 30, 2018. We have also reserved the Toys receivable arising from the straight-lining of rent as of March 31, 2018.
7.
Marketable
Securities
As of March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017, we owned 535,265 common shares of Macerich (NYSE: MAC). These shares have an economic cost of $56.05 per share, or $30,000,000 in the aggregate. As of March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017, the fair value of these shares was $29,986,000 and $35,156,000, respectively, based on Macerich’s closing share price of $56.02
per share and $65.68 per share, respectively. These shares are included in “marketable securities” on our consolidated balance sheets and are classified as available-for-sale. Available-for-sale securities are presented at fair value on our consolidated balance sheets. Prior to January 1, 2018, unrealized gains and losses resulting from the change in fair value of these securities were included in “other comprehensive income (loss).” Effective January 1, 2018, changes in the fair value of these securities are recognized in current period earnings in accordance with ASC 825. For the three months ended March 31, 2018 we recorded a decrease in the fair value of our marketable securities of $5,170,000 resulting from Macerich’s
closing share price of $56.02 as of March 31, 2018, compared to $65.68 as of December 31, 2017.
8.
Discontinued Operations
In 2012, we sold the Kings Plaza Regional Shopping Center (“Kings Plaza”) and paid real property transfer taxes to New York City in connection with the sale. In 2015, the New York City Department of Finance (“NYC DOF”) issued a Notice of Determination to us assessing an additional New York City real property
transfer tax amount, including interest, which we are contesting.
In 2014, in a case with similar facts, the NYC DOF issued a Notice of Determination to a Vornado joint venture assessing an additional New York City real property transfer tax amount, including interest. In January 2017, a New York City administrative law judge made a determination upholding the Vornado joint venture’s position that such additional real property transfer taxes were not due. On February 16, 2018, the New York City Tax Appeals Tribunal (the “Tribunal”) overturned the January 2017 determination. The Vornado joint venture is appealing the Tribunal’s decision to the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York.
Based on the precedent of the Tribunal’s decision, we accrued an expense for the potential additional real property transfer
taxes of $23,797,000 ($15,874,000 of real property transfer tax and $7,923,000 of interest) during the three months ended March 31, 2018. On April 5, 2018, we paid this amount in order to stop the interest from accruing. Our case is on hold pending the outcome of the Vornado joint venture’s appeal.
As the results related to Kings Plaza were previously classified as discontinued operations, we have classified the expense as “loss from discontinued operations” on our consolidated statement of income for the three months ended March 31, 2018 in accordance with the provisions of ASC Topic 360, Property, Plant and
Equipment. In addition, the accrued expense is reflected as “liability related to discontinued operations” on our consolidated balance sheet as of March 31, 2018 and on our consolidated statement of cash flows for the three months ended March 31, 2018.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(UNAUDITED)
9.
Significant
Tenant
Bloomberg L.P. (“Bloomberg”) accounted for revenue of $26,324,000 and $26,010,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively, representing approximately 45% of our total revenues in each period. No other tenant accounted for more than 10% of our total revenues. If we were to lose Bloomberg as a tenant, or if Bloomberg were to be unable to fulfill its obligations under its lease, it would adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition. In order to assist us in our continuing assessment of Bloomberg’s creditworthiness, we receive
certain confidential financial information and metrics from Bloomberg. In addition, we access and evaluate financial information regarding Bloomberg from other private sources, as well as publicly available data.
10.
Mortgages Payable
The following is a summary of our outstanding mortgages payable as of March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017. We may refinance our maturing debt as it comes due or choose to repay it.
Rego Park I shopping center (100% cash collateralized)(2)
May 2018
0.35%
$
78,246
$
78,246
Paramus
Oct.
2018
2.90%
68,000
68,000
Rego Park II shopping center(3)
Nov. 2018
3.74%
255,223
256,194
731
Lexington Avenue, retail space(4)
Aug. 2022
3.09%
350,000
350,000
731 Lexington Avenue, office space(5)
Jun.
2024
2.68%
500,000
500,000
Total
1,251,469
1,252,440
Deferred
debt issuance costs, net of accumulated amortization of $7,628 and $6,315, respectively
(10,905
)
(12,218
)
$
1,240,564
$
1,240,222
(1)
Represents
the extended maturity where we have the unilateral right to extend.
(2)
Extended in March 2018 for two months.
(3)
Interest at LIBOR plus 1.85%. See Note 5 for details of our Rego Park II loan participation.
(4)
Interest
at LIBOR plus 1.40%.
(5)
Interest at LIBOR plus 0.90%.
11.
Fair Value Measurements
ASC Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements
and Disclosures (“ASC 820”) defines fair value and establishes a framework for measuring fair value. ASC 820 establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes observable and unobservable inputs used to measure fair value into three levels: Level 1 – quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for assets or liabilities; Level 2 – observable prices that are based on inputs not quoted in active markets, but corroborated by market data; and Level 3 – unobservable inputs that are used when little or no market data is available. The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to Level 1 inputs and the lowest priority to Level 3 inputs. In determining fair value, we utilize valuation techniques that maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs to the extent possible, as well as consider counterparty credit risk in our assessment of fair value.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(UNAUDITED)
11.
Fair Value Measurements - continued
Financial Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value
Financial assets measured at fair value on our consolidated balance sheets as of March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017, consist of marketable securities and an
interest rate cap, which are presented in the table below based on their level in the fair value hierarchy. There were no financial liabilities measured at fair value as of March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017.
Financial
Assets and Liabilities not Measured at Fair Value
Financial assets and liabilities that are not measured at fair value on our consolidated balance sheets include cash equivalents, the Rego Park II loan participation and mortgages payable. Cash equivalents are carried at cost, which approximates fair value due to their short-term maturities and are classified as Level 1. The fair values of the Rego Park II loan participation and our mortgages payable are calculated by discounting the future contractual cash flows of these instruments using current risk-adjusted rates available to borrowers with similar credit ratings, which are provided by a third-party specialist, and are classified as Level 2. The table below summarizes the carrying amounts and fair value of these financial instruments as of March 31, 2018 and December 31,
2017.
We maintain general liability insurance with limits of $300,000,000 per occurrence and per property, and all-risk property and rental value insurance coverage with limits of $1.7 billion per occurrence, including coverage for acts of terrorism, with sub-limits for certain perils such as floods and earthquakes on each of our properties.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(CONTINUED)
(UNAUDITED)
12.
Commitments and Contingencies - continued
Fifty Ninth Street Insurance Company, LLC (“FNSIC”), our wholly owned consolidated subsidiary, acts as a direct insurer for coverage for acts of terrorism, including nuclear, biological, chemical and radiological (“NBCR”) acts, as defined by the Terrorism Risk Insurance Program Reauthorization Act, which expires in December 2020. Coverage for acts of terrorism (including NBCR acts) is up to $1.7 billion per occurrence and in the aggregate. Coverage for acts of terrorism (excluding
NBCR acts) is fully reinsured by third party insurance companies and the Federal government with no exposure to FNSIC. For NBCR acts, FNSIC is responsible for a $306,000 deductible and 18% of the balance of a covered loss, and the Federal government is responsible for the remaining 82% of a covered loss. We are ultimately responsible for any loss incurred by FNSIC.
We continue to monitor the state of the insurance market and the scope and costs of coverage for acts of terrorism. However, we cannot anticipate what coverage will be available on commercially reasonable terms in the future. We are responsible for deductibles and losses in excess of our insurance coverage, which could be material.
Our mortgage loans are non-recourse to us and contain
customary covenants requiring us to maintain insurance. Although we believe that we have adequate insurance coverage for purposes of these agreements, we may not be able to obtain an equivalent amount of coverage at reasonable costs in the future. If lenders insist on greater coverage than we are able to obtain, it could adversely affect our ability to finance our properties.
Paramus
In 2001, we leased 30.3 acres of land located in Paramus, New Jersey to IKEA Property, Inc. The lease has a purchase option in 2021 for $75,000,000. The property is encumbered by a $68,000,000 interest-only mortgage loan with a fixed rate of 2.90%, which matures on October 5,
2018. The annual triple-net rent is the sum of $700,000 plus the amount of debt service on the mortgage loan. If the purchase option is exercised, we will receive net cash proceeds of approximately $7,000,000 and recognize a gain on sale of land of approximately $60,000,000. If the purchase option is not exercised, the triple-net rent for the last 20 years would include debt service sufficient to fully amortize $68,000,000 over the remaining 20-year lease term.
Rego Park I Litigation
In June 2014, Sears Roebuck and Co. (“Sears”) filed a lawsuit in the Supreme Court of the State of New York against
Vornado and us (and certain of our subsidiaries) with regard to space that Sears leases at our Rego Park I property alleging that the defendants are liable for harm that Sears has suffered as a result of (a) water intrusions into the premises, (b) two fires in February 2014 that caused damages to those premises, and (c) alleged violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act in the premises’ parking garage. Sears asserted various causes of actions for damages and sought to compel compliance with landlord’s obligations to repair the premises and to provide security, and to compel us to abate a nuisance that Sears claims was a cause of the water intrusions into its premises. In addition to injunctive relief, Sears sought, among other things, damages of not less than $4 million and future damages
it estimated would not be less than $25 million. In March 2016, Sears withdrew its claim for future damages leaving a remaining claim for property damages, which we estimate to be approximately $650,000 based on information provided by Sears. We intend to defend the remaining claim vigorously. The amount or range of reasonably possible losses, if any, is not expected to be greater than $650,000.
On April 4, 2017, Sears closed its 195,000 square foot store at our Rego Park I property. Annual revenue is approximately $10,400,000, under a lease which expires in March 2021. In its 2016 annual report on Form 10-K, Sears indicated that substantial doubt exists
related to its ability to continue as a going concern. There are $3,568,000 of receivables arising from the straight-lining of rent and $374,000 of unamortized deferred leasing costs on our consolidated balance sheet related to the Sears lease as of March 31, 2018 which we will continue to assess for recoverability.
Letters of Credit
Approximately $1,040,000 of standby letters of credit were issued and outstanding as of March 31, 2018.
Other
There are various other legal
actions against us in the ordinary course of business. In our opinion, the outcome of such matters in the aggregate will not have a material effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(UNAUDITED)
13.
Earning
Per Share
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted income per share. Basic income per share is determined using the weighted average shares of common stock outstanding during the period. Diluted income per share is determined using the weighted average shares of common stock outstanding during the period, and assumes all potentially dilutive securities were converted into common shares at the earliest date possible. There were no potentially dilutive securities outstanding during the three months ended March 31, 2018 and 2017.
Three
Months Ended March 31,
(Amounts in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
2018
2017
Income from continuing operations
$
14,097
$
21,667
Loss
from discontinued operations (see Note 8)
(23,797
)
—
Net (loss) income
$
(9,700
)
$
21,667
Weighted
average shares outstanding – basic and diluted
5,115,982
5,114,701
Income from continuing operations
$
2.75
$
4.24
Loss
from discontinued operations (see Note 8)
(4.65
)
—
Net (loss) income per common share – basic and diluted
$
(1.90
)
$
4.24
16
REPORT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of Alexander’s, Inc.
Results of Review of Interim Financial Information
We have reviewed the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Alexander’s, Inc. and subsidiaries (the "Company") as of March 31, 2018, the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, changes in equity, and cash flows, for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2018 and 2017, and the related notes (collectively referred
to as the "interim financial information"). Based on our review, we are not aware of any material modifications that should be made to the accompanying interim financial information for it to be in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
We have previously audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the consolidated balance sheet of the Company as of December 31, 2017, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, changes in equity and cash flows for the year then ended (not presented herein); and in our report dated February 12, 2018, we expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated
financial statements. In our opinion, the information set forth in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2017, is fairly stated, in all material respects, in relation to the consolidated balance sheet from which it has been derived.
Basis for Review Results
This interim financial information is the responsibility of the Company's management. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We
conducted our reviews in accordance with standards of the PCAOB. A review of interim financial information consists principally of applying analytical procedures and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB, the objective of which is the expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Certain statements contained in this Quarterly Report constitute forward-looking statements as such term is defined in Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance. They involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions. Our future results, financial condition, results of operations and business may differ materially from those expressed in these forward-looking statements. You can find many of these statements by looking for words such as “approximates,”“believes,”“expects,”“anticipates,”“estimates,”“intends,”“plans,”“would,”“may” or other similar
expressions in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. These forward-looking statements represent our intentions, plans, expectations and beliefs and are subject to numerous assumptions, risks and uncertainties. Many of the factors that will determine these items are beyond our ability to control or predict. For a further discussion of factors that could materially affect the outcome of our forward-looking statements, see “Item 1A – Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017. For these statements, we claim the protection of the safe harbor for forward-looking statements contained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. You are cautioned not to place undue reliance on the forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q or the date of any document incorporated by reference.
All subsequent written and oral forward-looking statements attributable to us or any person acting on our behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by the cautionary statements contained or referred to in this section. We do not undertake any obligation to release publicly, any revisions to our forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations include a discussion of our consolidated financial statements for the three months ended March 31, 2018 and 2017. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported
amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results could differ from those estimates. The results of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2018 are not necessarily indicative of the operating results for the full year.
Critical Accounting Policies
A summary of our critical accounting policies is included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017 in “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and “Note 2 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” to the consolidated financial statements included therein. For the
three months ended March 31, 2018, there were no material changes to these policies, other than the adoption of Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2014-09, described in “Part I - Financial Information, Item 1 - Financial Statements, Note 3 - Recently Issued Accounting Literature” of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
18
Overview
Alexander’s, Inc. (NYSE: ALX) is a real estate investment trust (“REIT”), incorporated in Delaware, engaged in leasing, managing, developing and redeveloping its properties. All references to “we,”“us,”“our,”“Company,”
and “Alexander’s”, refer to Alexander’s, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries. We are managed by, and our properties are leased and developed by, Vornado Realty Trust (“Vornado”) (NYSE: VNO). We have seven properties in the greater New York City metropolitan area.
We compete with a large number of property owners and developers. Our success depends upon, among other factors, trends of the world, national and local economies, the financial condition and operating results of current and prospective tenants and customers, the availability and cost of capital, construction and renovation costs, taxes, governmental regulations, legislation, population trends, zoning laws, and our ability to lease, sublease or sell our properties, at profitable levels. Our success is also subject to our ability to refinance existing debt on acceptable
terms as it comes due.
Real Property Transfer Tax Litigation
In 2012, we sold the Kings Plaza Regional Shopping Center (“Kings Plaza”) and paid real property transfer taxes to New York City in connection with the sale. In 2015, the New York City Department of Finance (“NYC DOF”) issued a Notice of Determination to us assessing an additional New York City real property transfer tax amount, including interest, which we are contesting.
In 2014, in a case with similar facts, the NYC DOF issued a Notice of Determination to a Vornado joint venture assessing an additional New York City real property transfer tax amount, including interest. In January 2017, a New York City administrative law judge made a determination upholding the Vornado joint venture’s position that such additional real property transfer taxes were not due. On
February 16, 2018, the New York City Tax Appeals Tribunal (the “Tribunal”) overturned the January 2017 determination. The Vornado joint venture is appealing the Tribunal’s decision to the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York.
Based on the precedent of the Tribunal’s decision, we accrued an expense for the potential additional real property transfer taxes of $23,797,000 ($15,874,000 of real property transfer tax and $7,923,000 of interest) during the three months ended March 31, 2018. On April 5, 2018, we paid this amount in order to stop the interest from accruing. Our case is on hold pending the outcome of the Vornado joint venture’s appeal.
Net loss for the quarter ended March 31, 2018 was $9,700,000, or $1.90 per diluted share, compared to net income of $21,667,000, or $4.24 per diluted share in the prior year’s quarter. Negative funds from operations (“FFO”) (non-GAAP) for the quarter ended March 31, 2018 was $1,549,000, or $0.30 per diluted share, compared to positive FFO (non-GAAP) of $29,581,000, or $5.78 per diluted share in the prior year’s quarter. Net loss and negative FFO for the quarter ended March 31, 2018 included (i) $23,797,000, or $4.65 per diluted share, of accrued expense for potential additional New York City real property transfer taxes on the 2012 sale of Kings Plaza, which is being contested and (ii) $5,170,000, or $1.01 per diluted
share, of expense from the decrease in the fair value of marketable securities resulting from a new GAAP accounting standard effective January 1, 2018. Previously, changes in the fair value of marketable securities were recognized through “accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income” on our consolidated balance sheets and did not impact our consolidated statements of income.
Square Footage, Occupancy and Leasing Activity
As of March 31, 2018, our portfolio was comprised of seven properties aggregating 2,437,000 square feet and was 99.1% occupied.
19
Overview
- continued
Tenant Matters
On April 4, 2017, Sears closed its 195,000 square foot store at our Rego Park I property. Annual revenue is approximately $10,400,000, under a lease which expires in March 2021. In its 2016 annual report on Form 10-K, Sears indicated that substantial doubt exists related to its ability to continue as a going concern. There are $3,568,000 of receivables arising from the straight-lining of rent and $374,000 of unamortized deferred leasing costs on our consolidated balance sheet related to the Sears lease as of March 31, 2018 which we will continue to assess for recoverability.
On September 18, 2017, Toys “R” Us,
Inc. (“Toys”), which leases 47,000 square feet of retail space at our Rego Park II shopping center ($2,600,000 of annual revenue) filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy relief. On March 15, 2018, Toys sought authorization to wind down U.S. operations, including closing U.S. stores and liquidating all U.S. inventory, which relief was granted on an interim basis on March 22, 2018. There are $588,000 of tenant improvements, $215,000 of unamortized deferred leasing costs and $500,000 of receivables arising from the straight-lining of rent on our consolidated balance sheet related to the Toys lease as of March 31, 2018. Pursuant to the bankruptcy court proceedings, Toys plans to close its store at our Rego II property by June 30, 2018. Consequently, we are accelerating depreciation
and amortization of the remaining balances of tenant improvements and deferred leasing costs to the second quarter ending June 30, 2018. We have also reserved the Toys receivable arising from the straight-lining of rent as of March 31, 2018.
Rego Park II Loan Participation
On July 28, 2017, we entered into a participation and servicing agreement with the lender on our Rego Park II shopping center loan, which matures on November 30, 2018. We paid $200,000,000 to participate in the loan and are entitled to interest of LIBOR plus 1.60% (3.49% as of March 31,
2018).
Significant Tenant
Bloomberg L.P. (“Bloomberg”) accounted for revenue of $26,324,000 and $26,010,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively, representing approximately 45% of our total revenues in each period. No other tenant accounted for more than 10% of our total revenues. If we were to lose Bloomberg as a tenant, or if Bloomberg were to be unable to fulfill its obligations under its lease, it would adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition. In order to assist us in our continuing assessment of Bloomberg’s creditworthiness, we receive certain confidential financial information and metrics from Bloomberg. In addition, we access and evaluate financial
information regarding Bloomberg from other private sources, as well as publicly available data.
Property rentals were $38,241,000 in the quarter ended March 31, 2018, compared to $38,273,000 in the prior year’s quarter, a decrease of $32,000.
Expense
Reimbursements
Tenant expense reimbursements were $19,639,000 in the quarter ended March 31, 2018, compared to $18,956,000 in the prior year’s quarter, an increase of $683,000. This increase was primarily due to higher reimbursable real estate taxes and operating expenses.
Operating Expenses
Operating expenses were $22,277,000 in the quarter ended March 31, 2018, compared to $20,921,000 in the prior year’s quarter, an increase of $1,356,000. This increase was primarily due to (i) higher real estate taxes of $503,000, (ii) higher reimbursable operating expenses of $419,000 and (iii) higher bad debt expense of $407,000.
Depreciation
and Amortization
Depreciation and amortization was $8,283,000 in the quarter ended March 31, 2018, compared to $8,045,000 in the prior year’s quarter, an increase of $238,000.
General and Administrative Expenses
General and administrative expenses were $1,261,000 in the quarter ended March 31, 2018, compared to $1,156,000 in the prior year’s quarter, an increase of $105,000.
Interest and Other Income, net
Interest and other income, net was $3,038,000 in the quarter ended March 31, 2018,
compared to $727,000 in the prior year’s quarter, an increase of $2,311,000. This increase was primarily due to higher interest income of $1,585,000 from the Rego Park II loan participation and $609,000 from an increase in average interest rates.
Interest and Debt Expense
Interest and debt expense was $9,829,000 in the quarter ended March 31, 2018, compared to $6,160,000 in the prior year’s quarter, an increase of $3,669,000. This increase was primarily due to higher interest expense of (i) $1,689,000 due to an increase in average LIBOR, (ii) $1,334,000 resulting from the refinancing of the office portion of 731 Lexington Avenue on June 1, 2017 for $500,000,000 at LIBOR plus 0.90% (previously a $300,000,000 loan at LIBOR plus 0.95%) and
(iii) $789,000 of higher amortization of debt issuance costs.
Change in Fair Value of Marketable Securities
Change in fair value of marketable securities was an expense of $5,170,000 in the quarter ended March 31, 2018, resulting from The Macerich Company’s closing share price of $56.02 as of March 31, 2018, compared to $65.68 as of December 31, 2017, on 535,265 shares owned. See “Part I - Financial Information, Item 1 - Financial Statements, Note 3 - Recently Issued Accounting Literature.”
Income Taxes
Income tax expense was $1,000 in the quarter
ended March 31, 2018, compared to $7,000 in the prior year’s quarter.
Loss from Discontinued Operations
Loss from discontinued operations was $23,797,000 in the quarter ended March 31, 2018. The loss was due to an accrual of potential additional real property transfer taxes from the 2012 sale of Kings Plaza which is being contested. See “Part I - Financial Information, Item 1 - Financial Statements, Note 8 - Discontinued Operations.”
21
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
Cash Flows
Property rental income is our primary source of cash flow and is dependent on a number of factors, including the occupancy level and rental rates of our properties, as well as our tenants’ ability to pay their rents. Our properties provide us with a relatively consistent stream of cash flow that enables us to pay our operating expenses, interest expense, recurring capital expenditures and cash dividends to stockholders. Other sources of liquidity to fund cash requirements include our existing cash, proceeds from financings, including mortgage or construction loans secured by our properties and proceeds from asset sales. We anticipate that cash flows from continuing operations over the next twelve months, together with existing cash balances, will be adequate to fund our business operations, cash dividends to stockholders, debt amortization and capital
expenditures. We may refinance our maturing debt as it comes due or choose to repay it.
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash were $406,216,000 as of March 31, 2018, compared to $393,279,000 as of December 31, 2017, an increase of $12,937,000. This increase resulted from (i) $36,805,000 of net cash provided by operating activities and (ii) $125,000 of net cash provided by investing activities, partially offset by (iii) $23,993,000 of net cash used in financing activities.
Net cash provided by operating activities of $36,805,000 was comprised of (i) adjustments for non-cash items
of $40,008,000 and (ii) the net change in operating assets and liabilities of $6,497,000, partially offset by (iii) net loss of $9,700,000. The adjustments for non-cash items were comprised of (i) liability related to discontinued operations of $23,797,000, (ii) depreciation and amortization (including amortization of debt issuance costs) of $9,596,000, (iii) the change in fair value of marketable securities of $5,170,000 and (iv) straight-lining of rental income of $1,445,000.
Net cash provided by investing activities of $125,000 was comprised of principal repayment proceeds from the Rego Park II loan participation of $753,000, partially offset by construction in progress and real estate additions of $628,000.
Net cash used in financing activities of $23,993,000 was primarily comprised of dividends paid of $23,022,000.
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash were $392,026,000 as of March 31, 2017, compared to $374,678,000 as of December 31, 2016, an increase of $17,348,000. This increase resulted from (i) $41,623,000 of net cash provided by operating activities, partially offset by (ii) $22,647,000 of net cash used in financing activities and (iii) $1,628,000 of net cash used in investing activities.
Net cash provided by operating activities of $41,623,000 was comprised of net income of $21,667,000, adjustments for non-cash items of $9,639,000 and the net change in operating assets and liabilities of $10,317,000. The adjustments for non-cash items were comprised
of depreciation and amortization (including amortization of debt issuance costs) of $8,569,000 and straight-lining of rental income of $1,070,000.
Net cash used in financing activities of $22,647,000 was primarily comprised of dividends paid of $21,737,000.
Net cash used in investing activities of $1,628,000 was comprised of construction in progress and real estate additions.
Commitments and Contingencies
Insurance
We maintain general liability insurance with limits of $300,000,000 per occurrence and per property, and all-risk property and rental value insurance coverage with limits of $1.7 billion per occurrence, including coverage for acts of terrorism, with sub-limits for certain perils such as floods and earthquakes on each of our properties.
Fifty
Ninth Street Insurance Company, LLC (“FNSIC”), our wholly owned consolidated subsidiary, acts as a direct insurer for coverage for acts of terrorism, including nuclear, biological, chemical and radiological (“NBCR”) acts, as defined by the Terrorism Risk Insurance Program Reauthorization Act, which expires in December 2020. Coverage for acts of terrorism (including NBCR acts) is up to $1.7 billion per occurrence and in the aggregate. Coverage for acts of terrorism (excluding NBCR acts) is fully reinsured by third party insurance companies and the Federal government with no exposure to FNSIC. For NBCR acts, FNSIC is responsible for a $306,000 deductible and 18% of the balance of a covered loss, and the Federal government is responsible for the remaining 82% of a covered loss. We are ultimately responsible for any loss incurred by FNSIC.
22
Liquidity
and Capital Resources - continued
We continue to monitor the state of the insurance market and the scope and costs of coverage for acts of terrorism. However, we cannot anticipate what coverage will be available on commercially reasonable terms in the future. We are responsible for deductibles and losses in excess of our insurance coverage, which could be material.
Our mortgage loans are non-recourse to us and contain customary covenants requiring us to maintain insurance. Although we believe that we have adequate insurance coverage for purposes of these agreements, we may not be able to obtain an equivalent amount of coverage at reasonable costs in the future. If lenders insist on greater coverage than we are able to obtain, it could adversely affect our ability to finance our properties.
Rego Park I Litigation
In
June 2014, Sears Roebuck and Co. (“Sears”) filed a lawsuit in the Supreme Court of the State of New York against Vornado and us (and certain of our subsidiaries) with regard to space that Sears leases at our Rego Park I property alleging that the defendants are liable for harm that Sears has suffered as a result of (a) water intrusions into the premises, (b) two fires in February 2014 that caused damages to those premises, and (c) alleged violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act in the premises’ parking garage. Sears asserted various causes of actions for damages and sought to compel compliance with landlord’s obligations to repair the premises and to provide security, and to compel us to abate a nuisance that Sears claims was a cause of the water intrusions into its premises. In addition to injunctive relief, Sears sought, among other things, damages of not less
than $4 million and future damages it estimated would not be less than $25 million. In March 2016, Sears withdrew its claim for future damages leaving a remaining claim for property damages, which we estimate to be approximately $650,000 based on information provided by Sears. We intend to defend the remaining claim vigorously. The amount or range of reasonably possible losses, if any, is not expected to be greater than $650,000.
Paramus
In 2001, we leased 30.3 acres of land located in Paramus, New Jersey to IKEA Property, Inc. The lease has a purchase option in 2021 for $75,000,000. The property is encumbered by a $68,000,000 interest-only mortgage loan with a fixed rate of 2.90%, which matures on October 5, 2018. The annual triple-net rent is the sum of $700,000 plus the amount of debt service on the mortgage loan. If the purchase
option is exercised, we will receive net cash proceeds of approximately $7,000,000 and recognize a gain on sale of land of approximately $60,000,000. If the purchase option is not exercised, the triple-net rent for the last 20 years would include debt service sufficient to fully amortize $68,000,000 over the remaining 20-year lease term.
Letters of Credit
Approximately $1,040,000 of standby letters of credit were issued and outstanding as of March 31, 2018.
Other
There are various other legal actions against us in the ordinary course of business. In our opinion, the outcome of such matters in the aggregate will not have a material effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
23
Funds
from Operations (“FFO”) (non-GAAP)
FFO is computed in accordance with the definition adopted by the Board of Governors of the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (“NAREIT”). NAREIT defines FFO as GAAP net income or loss adjusted to exclude net gains from sales of depreciated real estate assets, real estate impairment losses, depreciation and amortization expense from real estate assets and other specified non-cash items, including the pro rata share of such adjustments of unconsolidated subsidiaries. FFO and FFO per diluted share are used by management, investors and analysts to facilitate meaningful comparisons of operating performance between periods and among our peers because it excludes the effect of real estate depreciation and amortization and net gains on sales, which are based on historical costs
and implicitly assume that the value of real estate diminishes predictably over time, rather than fluctuating based on existing market conditions. FFO does not represent cash generated from operating activities and is not necessarily indicative of cash available to fund cash requirements and should not be considered as an alternative to net income as a performance measure or cash flow as a liquidity measure. FFO may not be comparable to similarly titled measures employed by other companies. A reconciliation of our net (loss) income to (negative FFO) FFO is provided below.
(Negative FFO) FFO (non-GAAP) for the three months ended March 31, 2018 and 2017
Negative FFO (non-GAAP) for the quarter ended March
31, 2018 was $1,549,000, or $0.30 per diluted share, compared to positive FFO (non-GAAP) of $29,581,000, or $5.78 per diluted share in the prior year’s quarter. Negative FFO for the quarter ended March 31, 2018 included (i) $23,797,000, or $4.65 per diluted share, of accrued expense for potential additional New York City real property transfer taxes on the 2012 sale of Kings Plaza, which is being contested and (ii) $5,170,000, or $1.01 per diluted share, of expense from the decrease in the fair value of marketable securities resulting from a new GAAP accounting standard effective January 1, 2018. Previously, changes in the fair value of marketable securities were recognized through “accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income” on our consolidated balance sheets and did not impact our consolidated statements of income.
The
following table reconciles our net (loss) income to (negative FFO) FFO (non-GAAP):
Three Months Ended
March 31,
(Amounts in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
2018
2017
Net
(loss) income
$
(9,700
)
$
21,667
Depreciation and amortization of real property
8,151
7,914
(Negative
FFO) FFO (non-GAAP)
$
(1,549
)
$
29,581
(Negative
FFO) FFO per diluted share (non-GAAP)
$
(0.30
)
$
5.78
Weighted
average shares used in computing (negative FFO) FFO per diluted share
5,115,982
5,114,701
24
Item
3.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
We have exposure to fluctuations in interest rates, which are sensitive to many factors that are beyond our control. Our exposure to a change in interest rates is summarized in the table below.
2018
2017
(Amounts
in thousands, except per share amounts)
March 31, Balance
Weighted
Average
Interest Rate
Effect of 1%
Change in
Base Rates
December 31,
Balance
Weighted
Average
Interest Rate
Variable
Rate
$
1,105,223
3.05%
$
11,052
$
1,106,194
2.75%
Fixed
Rate
146,246
1.54%
—
146,246
1.54%
$
1,251,469
2.88%
$
11,052
$
1,252,440
2.61%
Total
effect on diluted earnings per share
$
2.16
As of March 31,
2018, we have an interest rate cap with a notional amount of $500,000,000 that caps LIBOR at a rate of 6.0%.
Fair Value of Debt
The fair value of our mortgages payable is calculated by discounting the future contractual cash flows of these instruments using current risk-adjusted rates available to borrowers with similar credit ratings, which are provided by a third-party specialist. As of March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017, the estimated fair value of our mortgages payable was $1,241,000,000 and $1,239,000,000, respectively. Our fair value estimates, which are made at the end of the reporting period, may be different from the amounts that may ultimately be realized upon the disposition of our financial instruments.
Item
4.
Controls and Procedures
(a) Disclosure Controls and Procedures: Our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Based on such evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of the end of such period, our disclosure controls and procedures are effective.
(b) Internal Control Over Financial Reporting: There have not been any changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the fiscal quarter to which this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
relates that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
25
PART II.
OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1.
Legal
Proceedings
We are from time to time involved in legal actions arising in the ordinary course of business. In our opinion, the outcome of such matters in the aggregate will not have a material effect on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
For a discussion of the litigation concerning our Rego Park I property, see “Part I – Financial Information, Item 1 – Financial Statements, Note 12 – Commitments and Contingencies.”
Item 1A.
Risk Factors
There
have been no material changes in our “Risk Factors” as previously disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017.
Item 2.
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
None.
Item 3.
Defaults
Upon Senior Securities
None.
Item 4.
Mine Safety Disclosures
Not applicable.
Item 5.
Other Information
None.
Item
6.
Exhibits
Exhibits required by Item 601 of Regulation S-K are filed herewith and are listed in the attached Exhibit Index.
Fifth
Omnibus Loan Modification and Extension Agreement, dated and made effective as of March 12, 2018, by and between Alexander’s Rego Shopping Center, Inc. and U.S. Bank National Association
Sixth Omnibus Loan Modification and Extension Agreement, dated and made effective as of April 12, 2018, by and between Alexander’s Rego Shopping Center, Inc. and U.S.
Bank National Association
Section 1350 Certification of the Chief Financial Officer
101.INS
-
XBRL
Instance Document
101.SCH
-
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema
101.CAL
-
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase
101.DEF
-
XBRL
Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase
101.LAB
-
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase
101.PRE
-
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase
27
SIGNATURES
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.