SEC Info - Morgan J P & Co Inc - 10-K - For 12/31/95

SEC Info

Home

My Interests

Help

Please Sign In

Morgan J P & Co Inc · 10-K · For 12/31/95 · EX-13

Filed On 3/25/96 · SEC File 1-05885 · Accession Number 68100-96-424

  As Of               Filer                 Filing     On/For/As Docs:Pgs

 3/25/96  Morgan J P & Co Inc               10-K       12/31/95    8:173

Annual Report · Form 10-K
Filing Table of Contents

Document/Exhibit                   Description                      Pages   Size 

 1: 10-K        Annual Report on Form 10-K of J.P. Morgan              9     45K 
 2: EX-10       Ex 10i - 1995 Stock Incentive Plan                    15±    63K 
 3: EX-10       Ex 10j - 1995 Executive Officer Performance Plan       5±    24K 
 4: EX-13       Annual Report                                        116    702K 
 5: EX-21       Ex 21 - Subsidiaries of Jp Morgan                      9±    30K 
 6: EX-23       Ex 23 - Consent of Price Waterhouse                    1      7K 
 7: EX-24       Ex 24 - Powers of Attorney                            16     37K 
 8: EX-27       Article 9 Financial Data Schedule                      2     11K

EX-13 · Annual Report
Exhibit Table of Contents

Page	(sequential)	\|	(alphabetic)	Top
			Alternative Formats (RTF, XML, et al.) Asset and Liability Management Commitments to extend credit Pretax income Securities lending indemnifications Standby letters of credit and guarantees 1994 1995
1	1st Page
7	Asset and Liability Management
9	1995
"	1994
31	Commitments to extend credit
32	Standby letters of credit and guarantees
"	Securities lending indemnifications
68	Pretax income

EX-13 1st Page of 116 TOC Top Previous Next Bottom Just 1st
Sponsored Ads...

J.P. Morgan is a global financial services firm that has built its business,
over 150 years, on a commitment to excel in serving clients with complex
financial needs.

Drawing on commercial, investment, and merchant banking traditions, we
strive to be an international leader in capability and character, to channel
capital to productive uses, and to earn superior returns over time for our
stockholders.

CONTENTS

1 Financial highlights
2 To our stockholders
6 Five business sectors
15 Risk management
22 Financial review
39 Responsibility for financial reporting
40 Report of independent accountants
41 Consolidated statement of income
42 Consolidated balance sheet
43 Consolidated statement of changes in stockholders' equity
44 Consoidated statement of cash flows
45 Consolidated statement of condition--
Morgan Guaranty Trust Company of New York
46 Notes to financial statements
80 Additional selected data
82 Consolidated average balances and taxable-equivalent
net interest earnings
85 Asset-quality analysis
91 Asset and liability management derivatives
92 Capital and funding analysis
95 Selected consolidated quarterly financial data
97 Form 10-K cross-reference index
99 Description of business
105 J.P. Morgan directory
109 Corporate information

EX-13 2nd Page of 116 TOC 1st Previous Next Bottom Just 2nd

FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS
J.P. Morgan & Co. Incorporated

· Download Table

Dollars in millions, except per share data 1995 1994
------ ------

FOR THE YEAR
Pretax income.......................................... $ 1 906 $ 1 825
Net income............................................. 1 296 1 215
Dividends declared on common stock..................... 574 530
-------- --------
PRIMARY EARNINGS PER SHARE............................. $ 6.42 $ 6.02
-------- --------
PER COMMON SHARE
Dividends declared..................................... $ 3.06 $ 2.79
Book value............................................. 50.71 46.73
-------- --------
AT YEAR-END
Total stockholders' equity............................. $ 10 451 $ 9 568
Total assets........................................... 184 879 154 917
-------- --------
SELECTED RATIOS
Return on average common stockholders' equity.......... 13.6% 12.9%
Common stockholders' equity as % of year-end assets.... 5.4 5.9
Total stockholders' equity as % of year-end assets..... 5.7 6.2
Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio........................ 8.8 9.6
Total risk-based capital ratio......................... 13.0 14.2
-------- --------

[GRAPHIC APPEARS HERE] [GRAPHIC APPEARS HERE]

EX-13 3rd Page of 116 TOC 1st Previous Next Bottom Just 3rd

TO OUR STOCKHOLDERS

J.P. Morgan earned $1.3 billion in 1995, up 7 percent from 1994; per share, net
income was $6.42 compared with $6.02 a year earlier. We gained momentum with
clients, held to a disciplined plan of expense growth, and improved the quality
of earnings.

Looking at the five major sectors of Morgan's global business, we saw
advances in those that center on services we provide for clients: Finance and
advisory revenues rose 27 percent to $1.5 billion; Sales and trading revenues
also grew 27 percent to $1.6 billion; and Asset management and servicing was
up 2 percent to $1.3 billion. The combined pretax contribution of these three
client-centered business sectors rose 70 percent in 1995 to $1.1 billion. In
the two sectors that cover activities undertaken solely for our own account,
revenues of $534 million from realized gains on Equity investments were down
from the high level of 1994, and Asset and liability management increased
modestly to $1 billion. Overall, these two sectors produced $1.4 billion of
income before taxes, slightly less than in 1994.

IN 1995 WE ACCELERATED THE DRIVE TO EARN A GROWING SHARE
OF OUR CLIENTS' BUSINESS AND HELD DOWN THE GROWTH OF EXPENSES.

Expenses for the year increased 8 percent. We invested in people and the
continued development of core business capacity, but checked the rise of all
other costs. In the second half of 1995, particularly, expense discipline
allowed us to bring revenue growth to the bottom line. Revenues for the second
half of the year were 15 percent higher than for the latter half of 1994.
Expenses over the same period, in contrast, rose just 6 percent.

Improved financial performance in 1995 was an important achievement. The
dynamics underlying that progress are even more significant.

The impact of investments made over the past decade is visible: J.P. Morgan
today has the most complete range of critical, sophisticated skills offered
by any financial firm in the world. Proficiency in equity, fixed income, and
advisory capabilities now complements credit, markets, and investment management
leadership of long standing. Fully $1 billion of revenue in 1995 was generated
by activities that produced little or nothing at the start of the 1990s, such as
securities underwriting in the United States and trading in emerging markets.
The vital strategic task of our recent history - transformation into a firm
that integrates investment, commercial, and merchant banking globally - is
essentially complete. We now have the challenge of realizing the potential
inherent in the new J.P. Morgan.

That task involves setting priorities among the many business opportunities
open to us. In sharpening strategic focus, we have made choices about what
not to do. One such choice was the sale in 1995 of Morgan's securities custody
and clearing operations. Consolidation among large providers was accelerating,
and these operations would have required substantial continuing investment. We
concluded that clients ultimately would be better served by institutions that
considered such operations intrinsic to their strategy. We decided our
investment dollars should be channeled to areas of greater potential value to
Morgan.

Dedication to clients and to superb performance on their behalf are
ingrained Morgan values. Having built the capabilities important to clients -
still motivated by those values - we are accelerating the drive to earn a
growing share of clients' financial business. Last year we rebalanced our
organization, orienting the entire firm around strengthened groups of bankers
whose job it is to draw together the right combination of global resources

EX-13 4th Page of 116 TOC 1st Previous Next Bottom Just 4th

[PHOTO APPEARS HERE]
Douglas A. Warner III
Chairman and
Chief Executive Officer

to meet clients needs. Client by client, we expanded our dialogue, focused
our efforts, and collaborated intently to win pivotal assignments that would
build trust in the value we contribute as an advisor, transactor, and financial
partner. Clients have responded. The result is growing momentum and growing
market share.

DEDICATION TO CLIENTS AND TO SUPERB PERFORMANCE ON THEIR
BEHALF ARE INGRAINED MORGAN VALUES.

In a record year for merger activity, Morgan advanced to be among the top
five merger and acquisition advisors worldwide, ranking first in Latin America
and second in Europe. We counseled clients in prominent transactions, including,
for example, the largest cross-border merger of the year, Hoechst's $7 billion
acquisition of Marion Merrell Dow, the $15.3 billion merger of TSB Group with
Lloyds Bank in the United Kingdom, and the $5.7 billion Westinghouse purchase of
CBS. Throughout Asia, we helped clients such as Telekom Malaysia, the Hong Kong
Mass Transit Railway Corporation, and San Miguel, the largest food and beverage
concern in Southeast Asia, gain access to international capital. We served as
a manager for $17 billion of equity issues and led milestone deals, including
the $470 million initial public offering of MEMC Electronic Materials, one of
the largest-ever technology IPOs. In debt underwriting, Morgan turned in strong
competitive performance in the United States, having long been a leader in the
Eurobond market, and joined the top tier of underwriters of investment-grade
corporate debt. As clients reevaluated the appropriate use of derivative
instruments and looked critically at dealers, Morgan gained market share and
continued to break new ground with sophisticated risk management services and
innovative products, such as credit derivatives. We remain a leader in the
syndicated loan and private debt and equity markets and continue to be at the
forefront in emerging markets. Assets we manage on behalf of institutional and
individual investors grew to $179 billion. Transaction volume at Euroclear, the
leading clearing and settlement system for international securities, reached
$25 trillion.

Productivity is improving, as we work to generate more revenue and value
for every dollar we spend. Intensive investment since the mid-1980s produced the
powerful framework we have today; in the process, inevitably, it built up a head
of steam in spending. Now further along in the investment cycle in most business
areas, we focused in 1995 on managing costs tightly, deliberately. Overall,
expense growth was held to 8 percent. Without cutting off the flow of investment
needed to deliver on our potential, without cutting into muscle, we have lowered
the trajectory of costs.

Looking ahead, what are our challenges for 1996 and beyond? How can we
fulfill the potential of J.P. Morgan and carry a great banking legacy into the
twenty-first century?

First and always, by being a source of superior value to clients. We aim to
perform with such commitment, speed, and effect that whenever and wherever
clients have a critical need, they turn to us.

EX-13 5th Page of 116 TOC 1st Previous Next Bottom Just 5th

Continuing to build our momentum with clients is our most promising growth
opportunity. If a client calls J.P. Morgan when the challenge is critical and
performance crucial, that call implies trust, on which productive long-term
relationships thrive. When we deliver superior advice and execution, we earn
the chance to build still greater confidence by introducing a satisfied client
to colleagues who can address other critical issues, in other markets. Being
the firm that a client calls first - and repeatedly - offers Morgan the chance
to play a role that uses our strengths and creates value through the
understanding, communication, and desire to excel that enduring relationships
naturally yield. Playing that critical role can maximize the return on our
investment in global capabilities, and - because disproportionate rewards go
to clients' lead firms - produce outstanding profits.

Our effort to earn more business from our clients through exceptional
performance will only intensify. This is our top priority.

EXPERIENCE IN COMMITTING OUR OWN CAPITAL GIVES CLIENTS
CONFIDENCE IN OUR ADVICE AND ABILITY TO ACT SUCCESSFULLY
IN THE MARKETS FOR THEM.

Investing and trading for our own account are also integral to our
business. Morgan must be a market force in its own right to accommodate the
needs of the multinational corporations, large institutions, and sophisticated
private concerns and individuals that constitute our client base. Positioning
is a natural adjunct of our dealings with them as we make markets in currencies
and instruments around the world. Experience in committing our own capital gives
investors and issuers confidence in our advice and ability to act successfully
in the markets for them.

Having the best possible risk-takers and a tolerance for risk that
accentuates our advantage will continue to be vital. As we press for growth in
our business with clients, we recognize that proprietary activities will always
be essential and can fire results when opportunities allow.

The complexity, breadth, and velocity of our business demand comprehensive
management of risk. We balance the benefits of decentralized global business
management with strong central policies, a constant flow of information, and
rigorous control. We manage actively and aim to detect a potential problem
before it escalates. While we seek constantly to improve the quality and
sophistication of our risk analysis, the most critical roles in managing risk
fall to responsible, skilled people and fundamental business diversification.

A leap in the productivity of our efforts is an imperative. We need to be
more visionary, more agile, less bureaucratic - anticipating change and focusing
energy on meeting the constantly evolving needs of our clients. As we invest,
we must set higher goals for expected return. Active, disciplined management
of our cost structure and allocation of resources to areas of opportunity are
part of the task; technology, clearly, has an important role to play. To design
the most efficient infrastructure for our business, we are exploring alliances
with technology firms and further consolidation of shared support services. At
the end of the day, we will test our work against the measures that count: the
value that we create for clients and stockholders, and by implication for our
people and communities. That is the way to boost our return on equity from the
result of last year - 13.6 percent - to the superior level that our owners
expect.

Meanwhile, the metamorphosis of the competitive landscape continues.
Formidable institutions - from the European universal banks to American super-
regionals

EX-13 6th Page of 116 TOC 1st Previous Next Bottom Just 6th

to premier investment banking houses - are fighting for a place among the few
preeminent global firms that will emerge from the restructuring of the financial
services industry now under way.

WE NOW HAVE THE CHALLENGE OF REALIZING THE POTENTIAL
INHERENT IN THE NEW J.P. MORGAN.

Unequivocally, J.P. Morgan intends to be one of those leaders. Intensive
focus on what our clients value and we do best will guide us. Institutional
scale is important, but to the extent that being big interferes with being
nimble, creative, and responsive, it will inhibit rather than enhance
comparative advantage. The struggle for survival among financial competitors may
drive down returns, but ultimately the firms that stay most relevant and
valuable to their clients will thrive.

Morgan's edge, we believe, will derive ultimately from its commitment to
clients. That commitment implies integrity, a passion to excel, and the patience
to build relationships over long horizons; it engenders trust, the most valuable
distinction of all. In reinforcing the reality that underlies our reputation as
a firm that can be trusted, we preserve a precious advantage.

We will push hard to be the best at what we do, in every market and every
product. We will continue to invest selectively and prize efficiency. We will
seek highly talented people, motivated by shared purpose and values, and
challenge them to develop their potential. Our management and hundreds of senior
officers will continue to be paid significantly in J.P. Morgan stock, so that we
run the firm as owners. But most of all we will try to draw out the best of J.P.
Morgan for our clients, in terms of both capability and character. That is the
wellspring of our vision and will drive our success.

/s/ Douglas A. Warner III

Douglas A. Warner III
Chairman of the Board
Chief Executive Officer

March 8, 1996

TRANSITIONS

[PHOTO APPEARS HERE]
RODNEY B. WAGNER

Drawing a multifaceted 40-year career at our firm to a close, Vice Chairman
Rodney B. Wagner retired in February 1996. In the best Morgan tradition, Rod has
served as a respected advisor to our clients, especially in emerging nations,
over decades of change and in more than a few crises. His long involvement in
the developing world began during the 1960s when he served for a period in
Washington, D.C., and Ankara as an executive of the Agency for International
Development. He was instrumental in resolving developing country debt problems
in the 1980s and helped design a landmark program for Mexico that became a
widely used model for debt restructuring. A superb ambassador of the firm,
Rod was also a friend and mentor to many.

Michael E. Patterson was named a vice chairman and director of J.P. Morgan
last December. He joined Morgan in 1987 as general counsel and has served as
the firm's chief administrative officer, with wide-ranging responsibilities,
since 1994.

In 1995 we also welcomed as a director Riley P. Bechtel, chief executive
officer of the Bechtel Group, a multinational construction firm. John G. Smale,
retired chairman of The Procter & Gamble Company, stepped down from the Board
during the year at the normal retirement age. We appreciate his many years of
valuable service.

We note finally, with sadness, the death on May 4, 1995, of Lewis T.
Preston, our former chairman, who was the architect of the modern J.P. Morgan
and the preeminent international banker of his era; and on March 2, 1996, of
Peter B. Smith, a valued member of our management team and chairman of the
Credit Policy Committee. They will be greatly missed.

EX-13 7th Page of 116 TOC 1st Previous Next Bottom Just 7th

We are committed to offering advice and execution of the highest
quality, conducting our business in a principled way, and maintaining
the global market power that allows us to help our clients succeed while
enhancing returns for our stockholders.

FIVE BUSINESS SECTORS

J.P. Morgan's purpose is to provide services of superior value to our clients,
enabling them to meet critical financial challenges globally. We have
specialized for more than 150 years in serving clients with sophisticated needs:
corporations, governments, institutions, and individuals around the world, as
both users and investors of funds. Their challenges range from exploring and
executing business strategy, to raising and structuring capital, to investing
and trading assets, to managing complex forms of risk. We are committed to
understanding our clients' goals, protecting their interests, and creating and
delivering the products and services that will advance their success. We offer a
complete range of investment, commercial, and merchant banking as well as asset
management capabilities, a pervasive global mindset, and a flexible, responsive
organization.

FINANCE AND ADVISORY

Morgan helps to structure and raise equity and debt capital throughout the world
to support clients' operating needs, counsels on business and financing
strategy, and executes transactions that advance strategic goals.

SALES AND TRADING

Morgan provides access to world financial markets for clients and trades for its
own account. We deal in securities, currencies, commodities, and derivatives to
help clients meet investment, trading, and risk management needs, supported by
comprehensive research on market conditions and opportunities.

ASSET MANAGEMENT AND SERVICING

Morgan invests assets entrusted to us by institutions and individuals, through
separately managed portfolios and investment funds. We also provide financial
advisory, banking, brokerage, and fiduciary services for private clients and
operate the world's largest securities clearing and settlement system for
internationally traded securities, Euroclear.

EQUITY INVESTMENTS

Morgan manages its own diversified portfolio of equity investments, turning
knowledge and experience around the world into a comparative investment
advantage for our stockholders. Many opportunities develop through relationships
with clients.

ASSET AND LIABILITY MANAGEMENT

Morgan actively manages the interest rate risk and liquidity profile of its
assets, liabilities, and off-balance-sheet exposures.

EX-13 8th Page of 116 TOC 1st Previous Next Bottom Just 8th

[GRAPHIC APPEARS HERE]

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FINANCE & ADVISORY
ADVISORY
EQUITIES
DEBT UNDERWRITING
CREDIT

Revenues were up 27% and pretax income rose sharply as record levels of merger
activity and favorable financing conditions gave us opportunities to
create value for clients. We gained market share as a strategic advisor,
completing transactions valued at $65 billion, and as an underwriter of
securities,raising $235 billion of debt and equity, and arranging $173 billion
of syndicated loans.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SALES & TRADING
FIXED INCOME
FOREIGN EXCHANGE
COMMODITIES
PROPRIETARY

Revenues grew 27% and pretax income rebounded, with market conditions improving
in both developed and emerging markets as the events that shook investor
confidence in 1994 receded. Morgan's performance in emerging markets was strong,
as were the results of our proprietary trading unit; trading revenue in
developed country fixed income markets declined. Demand for risk management
products strengthened, and foreign exchange revenues were up.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ASSET MANAGEMENT & SERVICING
ASSET MANAGEMENT
EXCHANGE TRADED
PRODUCTS
PRIVATE BANKING
OPERATIONAL SERVICES

Revenues were up modestly as a result of inflows of new business from
institutional investors. J.P. Morgan is one of the world's leading investment
managers, with $179 billion of assets under management. Brokerage revenues for
exchange-traded products held steady and transaction volumes rose, despite
lower industry market volume. Revenues from operational services declined as
a result of lower volumes in credit and deposit products, which in turn
contributed to a decrease in the sector's pretax income.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
EQUITY INVESTMENTS
EQUITY INVESTMENT
PORTFOLIO
MANAGEMENT

Revenues generated by our diversified $1 billion equity portfolio were 19% below
the high level of 1994. We made new private equity investments of $190 million
in 33 businesses last year, using our global network to identify trends and
opportunities. Total return - revenues plus the change in net unrealized
appreciation - increased 212% in 1995 to $387 million, reflecting a
higher rate of growth in the portfolio's value.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ASSET & LIABILITY MANAGEMENT
INTEREST RATE RISK
MANAGEMENT
LIQUIDITY MANAGEMENT

Revenues rose 5% to $1,013 million, as higher net interest revenue was realized
from activities in the United States and Asia. Total return, which combines
reported revenue and the change in net unrealized appreciation of our portfolio,
was up 25%, reflecting improved performance in Europe and Asia. We actively
manage the interest rate exposure of our portfolio, including $25 billion of
government securities, based on our judgments about long-term interest rate and
economic trends.

EX-13 9th Page of 116 TOC 1st Previous Next Bottom Just 9th

SUMMARY OF SECTOR RESULTS

J.P. Morgan's financial performance improved in 1995, with a better balance of
results among major business activities and continued progress toward strategic
goals, including expanding the scope of our relationships with clients. Overall,
the firm's revenues grew 7% to $5.9 billion. Expenses, at $4 billion, were up
8%, reflecting selective continued investment, especially in equities, asset
management, and private client resources, combined with tighter cost control.
Pretax income - shown in the table below - rose 4% to $1.9 billion.

· Enlarge/Download Table

Asset Asset and
Finance Sales Manage- Equity Liability
and and ment and Invest- Manage- Corporate Consol-
In millions Advisory Trading Servicing ments ment Items idated

1995
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Total revenues... $1 475 $1 649 $1 258 $534 $1 013 ($25) $5 904
Total expenses... 1 128 1 228 920 24 107 591 3 998
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pretax income.... 347 421 338 510 906 (616) 1 906

1994
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total revenues... 1 165 1 299 1 232 663 965 193 5 517
Total expenses... 1 056 1 154 835 23 93 531 3 692
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pretax income.... 109 145 397 640 872 (338) 1 825
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The firm's management reporting system and policies were used to determine the
revenues and expenses directly attributable to each sector. In addition,
earnings on stockholders' equity and certain overhead expenses not allocated for
management reporting purposes were allocated to each business sector. Earnings
on stockholders' equity were allocated based on management's assessment of the
inherent risk of each sector. Overhead expenses were allocated based primarily
on staff levels and represent costs associated with various support functions
that exist for the benefit of the firm as a whole. In both 1995 and 1994, $610
million related to income taxes was not allocated to the business sectors.

In these pages we present the year's results for five basic sectors of business
activity. Use of this sector framework helps to clarify our complex, global
business, although there are some vital dimensions it cannot capture: the
extensive diversification of activities within each sector; our comprehensive
process of risk management; the integration of global activities that heightens
responsiveness and efficiency; the complementary value of client-oriented and
proprietary activities; and the shared values and dedication to clients that
unite our people.

Revenues of $4.4 billion for the three business sectors that revolve
around activities for clients - Finance and Advisory, Sales and Trading, and
Asset Management and Servicing - grew 19%, and their combined pretax income of
$1.1 billion was up 70% from 1994, reflecting success in earning a growing share
of clients' financial business and in winning new clients. The $1.4 billion of
pretax income contributed by the Equity Investments and Asset and Liability
Management sectors, devoted exclusively to proprietary business, was down
modestly from 1994.

A significant strategic step was taken in 1995 with the sale of our
securities custody and clearing operations - part of a sharpened focus on our
core business activities. This sale does not affect our role as operator of the
Euroclear System.

EX-13 10th Page of 116 TOC 1st Previous Next Bottom Just 10th

We broke new ground in markets worldwide to help
clients meet critical challenges, putting our full set of
investment Banking And Credit Skills to work with
visible impact.

FINANCE AND ADVISORY
[GRAPHIC APPEARS HERE]

In 1995, J.P. Morgan accelerated its momentum in investment banking. From
advising on mergers to raising debt and equity capital to publishing research on
companies and industries, we expanded the scope of our effort and won new
business by identifying opportunities and solving problems for our clients.
Gains in market share were reflected in Morgan's advancement in industry
rankings of advisors and underwriters.

Three major trends affected the advisory and financing environment:
Corporations seeking to maximize shareholder value clarified their focus; the
availability of low-cost funds encouraged firms to raise capital; and cross-
border transactions redefined market boundaries. Morgan was strongly positioned
to capitalize on these trends.

Advisory revenues rose as transactions completed for clients placed
J.P. Morgan as the top-ranked merger-and-acquisition firm in Latin America,
second in Europe, and fifth worldwide. We completed 93 merger, acquisition, and
divestiture assignments valued at $65 billion. The breadth of our capabilities
enabled us to serve a number of clients at several stages of a transaction. For
example, we advised Service Corporation International, the world's largest
provider of funeral and cemetery services, on its $580 million acquisition of
the largest funeral operator in France and then lead-managed a $323 million
common stock offering and more than $700 million in public and private bond
offerings to finance the transaction and meet other company needs.

Debt and equity underwriting revenues also grew. We broke into the U.S.
"bulge bracket" to rank among the top six underwriters of investment grade
corporate debt. Our equities business advanced, as the quality of our research
and the effectiveness of our distribution had growing impact. Equity
underwriting revenues, generated in large part by initial public offerings for
technology, financial, and emerging markets issuers, increased nearly 30%.
Equity derivatives revenues were up as clients sought tools to help manage
market volatility.

Our syndicated loan volume rose sharply to $173 billion, ranking Morgan
as the third-largest arranger of these facilities. In a sign of the increasingly
global character of the market, we led a $2 billion credit facility for
electronics giant Siemens - the first international loan syndication for a
German company led by a non-German bank.

Total Finance and Advisory revenues rose 27% to $1,475 million.

SELECTED 1995 HIGHLIGHTS

ADVISED TSB GROUP ON ITS $15.3 BILLION MERGER WITH LLOYDS BANK - THE LARGEST M&A
DEAL IN EUROPE IN 1995.

ADVISED JOHNSON & JOHNSON ON ITS $1.8 BILLION UNSOLICITED BID AND SUBSEQUENT
FRIENDLY MERGER WITH CORDIS - CREATING THE WORLD'S LEADING MANUFACTURER OF
CARDIOLOGY EQUIPMENT.

LEAD-MANAGED A $130 MILLION CONVERTIBLE ISSUE FOR ALFA S.A., THE ONLY EQUITY
OFFERING BY A MEXICAN COMPANY IN 1995.

LEAD-MANAGED $637 MILLION OF ASSET-BACKED NOTES AND CERTIFICATES FOR FORD MOTOR
CREDIT CO. - THE FIRST SECURITIZATION OF SHORT-TERM OPERATING LEASES.

LED A $500 MILLION DEBUT ISSUE OF YANKEE BONDS FOR TELEKOM MALAYSIA, CITED AS
THE ASIAN BOND DEAL OF THE YEAR.

EX-13 11th Page of 116 TOC 1st Previous Next Bottom Just 11th

Sales, trading, and research teams provide clients with the
ability to tailor and execute both investment and risk
management strategies across every asset class in global markets.

SALES AND TRADING
[GRAPHIC APPEARS HERE]

Sales and trading results rebounded last year, as the strains of 1994 yielded to
growing investor confidence in both emerging and developed markets. Favorable
conditions produced strong client demand for the full range of our fixed income,
foreign exchange, and commodities products, including related derivatives.
Results in our separate proprietary unit were up, as we took advantage of
opportunities across markets, with particular success in Asia.

Morgan's research, noted in independent surveys for its depth and
insight, continued to create advantages for clients; our indices and models set
industry standards as performance benchmarks. We are a leading market-maker in
15 financial centers around the world, including as a primary dealer for the
government securities of every major industrialized country. An acknowledged
leader in risk management, our firm is cited for superior market-making,
pricing, and problem-solving skills.

Results in fixed income sales and trading were mixed; overall, revenues
declined. We maintained strong leadership in emerging markets, as investor
sentiment turned positive, spurring client demand and healthy revenue growth:
Trading volume was twice that of our nearest competitor. With rising interest in
markets beyond Latin America, we provided access to opportunities in countries
such as Poland, China, and Russia.

In developed country markets, bond trading revenues declined, mainly as
a result of losses in mortgage-backed securities. During the year, we
significantly curtailed mortgage-backed activities in a strategic realignment of
resources.

Demand for the range of interest rate, currency and other derivative
instruments strengthened, increasing our volumes roughly 40%, as clients
reassessed strategies and reaffirmed the value of derivatives as effective risk
management tools. Despite that demand, risk management revenues were affected by
losses on positions arising from some client activities.

Foreign exchange trading revenue rose significantly as client demand and
transaction volumes grew; commodities results were lower, reflecting a decline
in base-metals revenues, following an exceptionally good year in 1994.

Total Sales and Trading revenues rose 27% to $1,649 million.

SELECTED 1995 HIGHLIGHTS

EXECUTED EMERGING MARKETS TRANSACTIONS IN SECURITIES OF 50 COUNTRIES
VALUED AT $948 BILLION.

RANKED AS THE TOP DERIVATIVES DEALER AND THE TOP INTEREST RATE OPTIONS
AND SWAP OPTIONS HOUSE IN SEPARATE INDUSTRY SURVEYS. MORGAN WAS
CITED FOR THE BREADTH AND QUALITY OF ITS SERVICE AND ITS "UNDISPUTED"
DOMINANCE IN DOLLAR, YEN, AND DEUTSCHE MARK PRODUCTS.

NAMED EMERGING MARKETS RESEARCH HOUSE OF THE YEAR BY INTERNATIONAL
FINANCING REVIEW.

WROTE THE FIRST FOREIGN EXCHANGE FORWARD ON THE POLISH ZLOTY.

EX-13 12th Page of 116 TOC 1st Previous Next Bottom Just 12th

We use rigorous research and sophisticated skills to manage an
extensive range of investments on behalf of institutions
and individuals worldwide.

ASSET MANAGEMENT AND SERVICING
[GRAPHIC APPEARS HERE]

J.P. Morgan enhanced its position as one of the world's leading investment
managers in 1995. Assets under management grew 19% to $179 billion, one-third of
which is invested outside of the United States. We won a record level of new
business from institutional clients. More than a third of those assignments
involved managing international portfolios, as interest in non-U.S. markets
continued to grow.

We have a strong record of long-term performance and base our investment
approach on in-depth fundamental and quantitative research. With a broad array
of investment products, we manage both separate portfolios and pooled investment
vehicles, including 120 Morgan-managed mutual funds totaling $21 billion. In
1995 we began distributing two families of funds through selected institutional
marketplaces to reach a broader universe of independent financial advisors.

We help individuals around the world, and their associated trusts and
closely held businesses, to structure their assets optimally and to extract
greater value from their investments. We have been entrusted with the management
of $41 billion of private client assets. For those managing their own
portfolios, our full-service brokerage unit offers a complete range of global
securities and handled a fast-growing volume of client transactions in 1995. The
J.P. Morgan Asset Account, an integrated cash management and brokerage account,
was introduced to private clients last year.

As a broker of exchange-traded products, we are active dealers on 41
futures and options exchanges around the world. We execute and clear these
contracts on behalf of institutional clients. Our brokerage transaction volume
and market share grew on nearly all major exchanges, despite lower industry
market volume; revenues held steady.

With the growth of cross-border securities activity in 1995, the
Euroclear System settled $25 trillion in securities transactions, a 14% rise.
For more than 25 years, the Euroclear System - operated under contract by Morgan
in Brussels - has supported the growth of international securities markets by
offering efficient settlement, clearing, and related services to brokers,
dealers, custodians, investment managers, and other financial institutions.

In a strategic disposition, we sold our securities custody and clearing
business in 1995 and discontinued certain of our cash services. Revenues and
expenses for 1995 and 1994 associated with these businesses are in the Corporate
Items section.

Total Asset Management and Servicing revenues increased $26 million to
$1,258 million in 1995.

SELECTED 1995 HIGHLIGHTS

RANKED AMONG THE TOP 10 INSTITUTIONAL INVESTMENT MANAGERS FOR THE 21ST
CONSECUTIVE YEAR, WITH $138 BILLION IN ASSETS UNDER MANAGEMENT FOR
INSTITUTIONAL CLIENTS.

ADDED $300 MILLION OF CLIENT FUNDS THAT ARE INVESTED IN THE JAPANESE EQUITY
MARKET - USING A STRATEGY DUBBED "NIPPON NEUTRAL" - TO PRODUCE A STEADY
INCREMENTAL RETURN WHETHER THE MARKET GOES UP OR DOWN.

RANKED AS THE TOP FUTURES BROKER ON THE LONDON INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL
FUTURES EXCHANGE.

SETTLED $25 TRILLION OF TRANSACTIONS IN THE EUROCLEAR SYSTEM, AND WITH THE
ADDITION OF MEXICO INCREASED TO 25 THE NUMBER OF ITS DOMESTIC MARKET LINKS.

EX-13 13th Page of 116 TOC 1st Previous Next Bottom Just 13th

Using our own capital, we apply insights gained worldwide
to invest in high-potential opportunities.

EQUITY INVESTMENTS
[GRAPHIC APPEARS HERE]

For more than a decade, J.P. Morgan has invested its own capital in fast-growing
companies and special situations, drawing on global perspective and in-depth
industry knowledge to produce strong returns for our stockholders. We seek to
spot trends - in industries, markets, and technologies - before they reach the
mainstream and identify promising companies with the potential to become
leaders. For many firms at the forefront of innovation, private equity capital
from a knowledgeable investor like Morgan is what's needed to advance growth.
Inherently, equity investment of this type accepts higher risk to create the
potential for higher return.

Morgan's $1 billion private equity investment portfolio consists of
approximately 95 investments diversified by industry and geography. In 1995, we
invested $190 million in 33 businesses. More than half of our investments were
made in Europe, Latin America, and Asia. We committed capital to a range of
industrial sectors, including media, telecommunications, technology, consumer
products, and retail.

We have private equity investment professionals in New York, San
Francisco, Hong Kong, and Singapore. They can call on Morgan's global
resources - industry expertise, markets knowledge, and analytical support - as
they explore investment opportunities both through the firm's global network and
independently. Each possible investment is evaluated on its merits, in the
context of the risk and return profile of the firm's portfolio; many
opportunities develop from our relationships with clients. The realization of
gains accelerates when equity and merger markets are strong, but the process of
assessing new opportunities and managing existing investments continues
throughout market cycles.

Total Equity Investments revenues of $534 million were 19% lower than in
1994, when gains realized on holdings of Columbia/HCA Healthcare Corporation
stock were substantial. Total return, which combines revenues and the change in
net unrealized appreciation, increased 212% in 1995 to $387 million, reflecting
a higher rate of growth in the portfolio's value.

NET UNREALIZED APPRECIATION

· Download Table

IN MILLIONS 1993 1994 1995
----------- ---- ---- ----

Marketable
equity investments $1 030 $ 576 $ 440

Nonmarketable
equity investments 181 96 85
----- ----- -----
Total net unrealized
appreciation 1 211 672 525

EX-13 14th Page of 116 TOC 1st Previous Next Bottom Just 14th

We actively manage our interest rate profile to create
long-term value, based on our view of global interest
rate and economic trends.

ASSET AND LIABILITY MANAGEMENT
[GRAPHIC APPEARS HERE]

In managing interest rate risk on and off our balance sheet, our constant
objective is to create value over time, realized as net interest revenue and
securities gains. In anticipation of economic developments and fundamental
trends in interest rates, we dynamically adjust the interest rate profile of
assets, liabilities, and off-balance-sheet exposures, focusing on opportunities
to build long-term value. A full discussion of our approach to risk management
can be found in the next section of this report.

In 1995, we scaled down the level of risk in our asset and liability
management activities. Our risk profile did not position us to benefit
substantially in this sector from declines in U.S. interest rates. With a
conviction that key rates in Japan and Europe would fall, however, we took
asset and liability management positions that rewarded anticipation of those
trends.

Our liquidity risk profile was managed, as always, to ensure that we have the
ability to access funds at a reasonable cost, even under adverse conditions. A
strong capital position is an integral part of our liquidity management because
it enables us to raise funds as economically as possible in a variety of
international markets. In 1995 we took advantage of the favorable market
conditions to obtain attractive term funding for our business needs.

Asset and Liability Management revenues increased 5% to $1,013 million, as
higher net interest revenue was realized from activities in the United States
and Asia. Net unrealized appreciation declined to $553 million in 1995, mainly
as a result of the recognition of net interest revenue.

Total return, which combines reported revenue and the change in net
unrealized appreciation, increased 25% to $494 million in 1995. The rise
reflected improved performance in Europe and Asia, where we were well positioned
for declines in interest rates, partially offset by lower returns in the United
States.

UNREALIZED APPRECIATION (DEPRECIATION)

· Download Table

IN MILLIONS 1993 1994 1995
----------- ---- ---- ----

Debt investment
securities $ 859 $ 154 $ 484

Risk-adjusting
swaps 1 207 776 389

Long-term repurchase
agreements (119) 46 (152)

Other financial
instruments (305) 96 (168)
------ ----- ------
Total net unrealized
appreciation 1 642 1 072 553

EX-13 15th Page of 116 TOC 1st Previous Next Bottom Just 15th

CORPORATE ITEMS

Corporate Items include revenues and expenses that have not been allocated
to the five business sectors, intercompany eliminations, and the taxable
equivalent adjustment, which is calculated to gross-up tax exempt interest to a
taxable basis.

Revenues reported in this category in 1995 included a gain of $40
million related to the sale of the firm's global and local custody and U.S.
commercial paper issuing and paying agency businesses. Revenues and expenses for
1995 and 1994 related to these businesses as well as the firm's discontinued
cash services activities were as follows:

. Total revenues were $397 million in 1995, down from $414 million in 1994.

. Total expenses of $433 million in 1995 and $449 million in 1994 included
approximately $200 million, in both years, of costs allocated to these
activities that were primarily related to technology. Efforts are under
way to reduce these costs.

A $55 million charge related to expense management initiatives is also
included in Corporate Items in 1995.

Corporate Items in 1994 included a $54 million gain on the sale of the
domestic corporate trust business, $50 million of net interest revenue related
to income tax refunds, and past due interest claims from Brazil and Argentina.

EX-13 16th Page of 116 TOC 1st Previous Next Bottom Just 16th

RISK MANAGEMENT

The major risks of J.P. Morgan are market, liquidity, credit, legal, fiduciary
and agency, and operational. Comprehensive risk management processes have been
established to facilitate, control, and monitor risk-taking. These processes are
built on a foundation of early identification and analytically rigorous
measurement of risks by each of our businesses. Control mechanisms are in place
at different levels throughout the organization. The Corporate Risk Management
Group, individual businesses, as well as the audit, legal, financial, and
operations groups, are all involved in monitoring risks from a variety of
perspectives and ensuring that businesses are operating within established
corporate policies and limits. New businesses and material changes to existing
businesses are subjected to reviews to assure management that all significant
risks are identified and adequate control procedures are in place.

Operating within well-defined corporate policies and standards and subject
to thorough independent oversight, Morgan's business managers are responsible
for managing risks in the activities and markets in which they do business.
These managers, located in markets around the world, have firsthand knowledge of
changes in market, industry, credit, economic, and political conditions in their
host countries and use their experience and insights, supported by various risk
management tools, to adjust positions and revise strategies in an efficient and
timely manner. Our business managers are encouraged to protect against losses
from unexpected events by limiting the magnitude of the risks they take and
diversifying exposures and activities across a variety of instruments, markets,
clients, and geographic regions.

The Corporate Risk Management Group oversees our firmwide risk management
processes. The primary objective of the group is to develop, communicate, and
implement an institutional view of and process for managing risk across Morgan.
This unit, which is independent of our business groups, is managed by the head
of the Market Risk and Credit Policy committees.

The Corporate Risk Management Group performs independent reviews of
significant risk concentrations and has the authority to challenge any risk
position. The group establishes and controls market risk limits and
concentration limits for credit risk by considering exposure to particular
products, counterparties, industries, and geographic regions. The Corporate Risk
Management Group maintains a common risk management framework by developing,
communicating, and assisting business groups in implementing corporate risk
management policies, information systems, and methodologies. The group also
trains Morgan's professionals in our risk management policies
and methodologies.

The Market Risk and Credit Policy committees, along with the Operating Risk
Committee, are composed of members of senior management. The Market Risk
Committee reviews trends in the firm's market and liquidity risk profiles, and
the Credit Policy Committee reviews credit risk developments. The Operating Risk
Committee identifies and implements necessary changes to the firm's operating

EX-13 17th Page of 116 TOC 1st Previous Next Bottom Just 17th

environment, in response to changes in the marketplace, in technology, and in
the firm's strategic initiatives and organizational structures. The Board of
Directors periodically reviews trends in our risk profiles and performance as
well as any significant developments in risk management policies
and controls.

The processes and procedures by which we manage our risk profile
continually evolve as our business activities change in response to market,
credit, and product developments. We are always seeking to strengthen the risk
management process through continuous investments in technology and training.
Periodic reviews performed by internal auditors, regulators, and independent
accountants subject our practices to additional scrutiny and further
strengthen our processes.

MARKET RISK

Market risk is the uncertainty to which future earnings are exposed as a result
of changes in the value of portfolios of financial instruments. This risk is a
consequence of our trading and asset and liability management activities in the
interest rate, foreign exchange, equity, and commodity markets.

The estimation of potential losses that could arise from adverse changes in
market conditions is a key element of managing market risk. J.P. Morgan employs
a value at risk methodology to estimate such potential losses. The firm's
primary measure of value at risk is referred to as "Daily Earnings at Risk"
(DEaR). This measure takes into account numerous variables that may cause a
change in the value of our portfolios, including interest rates, foreign
exchange rates, securities and commodities prices, and their volatilities, as
well as correlations among these variables. Option risks are measured using
simulation analysis and other analytical techniques. These methods produce risk
measures that are comparable to those generated for nonoption risks. DEaR uses
historical one-day movements in these variables to estimate potential losses in
trading and asset and liability management activities assuming normal market
conditions and market liquidity. These estimates also take into account the
potential diversification effect of the different positions in each of our
portfolios. On a regular basis, the Corporate Risk Management Group calculates,
reviews, and updates the historic volatilities and correlations that serve as
the basis for these estimates.

DEaR's one-day horizon allows for a consistent and uniform measure of
market risk across all applicable products and activities. It also facilitates
regular comparison of risk estimates to daily revenue from our trading
activities, providing an indication of the quality of these estimates as well
as opportunities to enhance our risk measurement processes. DEaR measures
potential losses that are expected to occur within a 95% confidence level,
implying that actual daily revenue might exceed DEaR approximately 5% of the
time. In estimating DEaR, it is necessary to make assumptions about market
behavior. The standard forecast used by Morgan assumes normal market behavior
and an adverse market movement of 1.65 standard deviations.

Morgan utilizes DEaR as one tool to estimate potential market risk related
to all of our trading and asset and liability management activities. The
Corporate Risk Management Group sets DEaR limits for each trading activity, all
trading activities combined, and for our asset and liability management
activities. The level of risk to be assumed by a business is based on our
overall objectives, business manager experience, client requirements, market
liquidity, and volatility. Within these limits, business managers set regional,
local, product, currency, and trader limits as appropriate.

On a daily basis, Morgan estimates DEaR for each trading activity and all
trading activities combined. Similar daily estimates are made for our asset and
liability management activities. Senior management reviews a daily report of
profit and loss, aggregate positions, and the firm's global market risk
profile. This report also compares estimated DEaR for the above-mentioned
activities by

EX-13 18th Page of 116 TOC 1st Previous Next Bottom Just 18th

individual business and by principal market with relevant DEaR limits, and
includes a description of significant positions and a discussion of market
conditions. Senior managers meet daily to discuss the firm's global market risk
profile and trading strategies.

The DEaR methodology is a uniform measure used across the firm to
communicate and evaluate the relative level of market risk within and across
businesses and major markets. However, no single measure can capture all
dimensions of market risk. As a result, we supplement DEaR with additional
market risk information and tools. For example, stress tests that attempt to
measure the effect on portfolio values of unusual market movements are important
parts of market risk management, as they can help to identify potential
vulnerabilities to abnormal events. Stress testing can take several forms,
including simulation analysis; sensitivity analysis, for moves in values of
specific key variables such as volatilities and shifts in yield curves; and
specific event analysis, for measuring the impact of abnormal market conditions
associated with a specific market event.

MARKET RISK PROFILES

The following presents the market risk profiles for our trading activities and
asset and liability management activities as of and for the years ended December
31, 1995 and 1994. Overall, market risk levels of the firm in 1995 were in line
with 1994 as higher risk levels in trading activities were offset by lower
levels in asset and liability management activities.

Trading activities

The following graph presents DEaR related to our combined trading activities for
each trading day in 1995 and 1994, as well as the average quarterly DEaR. The
level of market risk in our trading portfolios, which is measured on a
diversified basis, will vary with market factors, the level of client activity,
and our expectations of price and market movements. Risk levels in 1994, as
depicted in the graph, reflected our response to difficult market conditions.
During 1995, our risk levels increased although still at levels considered to
be moderate. Our change in views of market opportunities throughout 1995 was
reflected primarily by higher market risk levels in our proprietary unit and
emerging markets activities.

[GRAPHIC APPEARS HERE]

EX-13 19th Page of 116 TOC 1st Previous Next Bottom Just 19th

At year-end 1995, DEaR for our combined trading activities across all market
risks was approximately $27 million, as compared with approximately $13 million
at year-end 1994. The primary sources of market risk associated with our trading
activities relate to movements in interest rates and foreign exchange rates,
each of which is measured on a diversified basis. At year-end 1995, DEaR of
$27 million represented the combination of interest rate risk of approximately
$20 million, foreign exchange rate risk of approximately $9 million, and all
other market risks of $9 million, offset by ($11) million reflecting additional
diversification among these risks. These estimates are based on various
correlation assumptions.

The frequency distribution of our 1995 daily combined trading-related
revenues, generated by our trading businesses, is presented below.

[GRAPHIC APPEARS HERE]

The above distribution around average daily revenue of $7.6 million reflects the
diversified and client-oriented nature of our global trading activities. Average
daily revenue was $5.8 million in 1994.

J.P. Morgan evaluates the reasonableness of our DEaR estimates by comparing
DEaR to daily revenue. In 1995, the quality of our risk estimates remained
strong. Consistent with statistical expectations, daily revenue fell short of
expected results by amounts greater than related DEaR estimates on approximately
4% of the trading days in 1995. In addition, the confidence bands depicted in
the above histogram, which represent 1.65 standard deviations around average
daily revenue, would imply an average DEaR of $18 million, compared to our
actual average DEaR estimate of $19 million for 1995.

We also evaluate various downside risk indicators. For example, average
daily revenue, for the 10 days that fell short of the downside confidence band,
was a loss of ($15) million in 1995, compared with a loss of ($23) million for
11 days in 1994.

EX-13 20th Page of 116 TOC 1st Previous Next Bottom Just 20th

Asset and liability management activities

We use a value at risk methodology to estimate over various time horizons the
potential earnings effect of a specified adverse movement in market prices in
our asset and liability management activities. Asset and liability management
portfolios are also reflected on a DEaR basis to allow for a consistent and
uniform measure of market risk across asset and liability management and trading
activities.

During 1995, value at risk measured over a weekly horizon averaged
approximately $39 million and ranged from $27 million to $56 million. This
compares with weekly average value at risk of approximately $53 million and a
range of $37 million to $81 million in 1994. These amounts approximate average
DEaR of $17 million and a range of $12 million to $25 million in 1995, and
average DEaR of $24 million and a range of $16 million to $36 million in 1994.
Risk levels related to our asset and liability management activities declined
in 1995, based on our view of longer-term market opportunities.

Weekly value at risk was approximately $29 million at year-end 1995, as
compared with approximately $48 million at year-end 1994. These amounts
approximate DEaR of $13 million at year-end 1995 and $22 million at year-end
1994.

We evaluate our weekly value at risk estimates relative to total return
over the same period. In 1995, weekly total return related to our asset and
liability management activities fell short of expected weekly results by amounts
greater than related weekly value at risk estimates approximately 5% of
the time.

LIQUIDITY RISK

Liquidity risk arises in the general funding of the firm's activities and in the
management of positions. It includes both the risk of being unable to fund our
portfolio of assets at appropriate maturities and rates, and the risk of being
unable to liquidate a position in a timely manner at a reasonable price.

Management of our liquidity profile is designed to ensure that even under
adverse conditions, we have access to the funds necessary to cover client needs,
maturing liabilities, and the capital requirements of our subsidiaries. Sources
of funds include interest-bearing and noninterest-bearing deposits, commercial
paper, bank notes, trading account liabilities, repurchase agreements, federal
funds purchased, long-term debt, and stockholders' equity. Liquidity targets are
maintained to ensure that we have adequate funds available to meet unforeseen
conditions. A strong capital position is integral to our ability to manage
liquidity.

The Global Liquidity Management Group develops and enhances procedures to
identify, measure, and monitor the firm's liquidity sources and uses. The group
is responsible for maintaining an adequate liquidity surplus and for long-term
liquidity planning and risk management. This is accomplished by monitoring
differences in maturities between assets and liabilities and by analyzing future
funding requirements based on various assumptions, including conditions that
might adversely impact our ability to liquidate investment and trading positions
and our ability to access the markets. The Global Liquidity Management Group
works closely with the Corporate Risk Management Group to develop and implement
policies to achieve its objectives.

The liquidity of trading asset inventories is monitored continuously by the
appropriate business managers. On a periodic basis the Corporate Risk Management
Group reviews the liquidity and turnover of certain of these inventories as part
of its overall business risk profile review.

CREDIT RISK

Credit risk arises from the possibility that counterparties may default on their
obligations to the firm. These obligations arise from our lending activities,
the extension of credit in our trading and investment activities, and from our
participation in payment and securities settlement transactions on our own
behalf and as agent for our clients.

EX-13 21st Page of 116 TOC 1st Previous Next Bottom Just 21st

Managing credit risk has both qualitative and quantitative aspects. The
qualitative aspect is determining the creditworthiness of the counterparties.
Experienced credit officers evaluate the credit quality of the firm's obligors
and counterparties and assign internal credit ratings based upon this
evaluation. These officers along with our business managers are responsible for
credit screening and monitoring. Credit concentration limits for various
industries, products, and countries are set by the Corporate Risk Management
Group. Credit limits for individual clients and counterparties are established
by credit officers with direct knowledge of the client's creditworthiness.
Established limits and actual levels of exposures are reviewed regularly by
senior management.

The quantitative aspect of credit risk begins with the measurement of
credit exposure to our counterparties. The Corporate Risk Management Group is
responsible for establishing the framework of policies and practices required
to measure such risk. We measure credit exposure in terms of both
current and potential credit exposure. Current credit exposure is generally
represented by the notional or principal value of on-balance-sheet financial
instruments and by the positive market value of derivative instruments. Because
many of our exposures are affected by changes in market prices, we also estimate
the potential credit exposure over the remaining term of the transactions
through statistical analysis.

In managing our credit risk, we also estimate potential losses associated
with these credit exposures. This process involves numerous assumptions and
considers a number of variables, including the credit quality of our
counterparties, duration of the credit exposure, default probabilities and
volatilities, collateral values, and expected recovery rates in the event of
default, as well as the diversification across counterparties, industries, and
geographic regions of our global credit portfolio.

The growing diversity of our business through an expanded range of products
and services and participation in international markets has increased the
complexity of managing credit risk. To reduce individual counterparty credit
risk, we attempt to deal with creditworthy counterparties, obtain collateral
where appropriate, and utilize master netting agreements, primarily in
connection with derivative products. Under a master netting agreement, losses
associated with one transaction with a counterparty are offset against gains
associated with another so that exposure is limited to the net of all the gains
and losses related to the transactions covered by the agreement. These
agreements primarily cover offsetting transactions involving a single product,
but we are seeking to expand the use of cross-product netting agreements to
obtain additional benefits of offsetting.

Our credit review procedures are designed to identify country, industry,
product, and client exposures that require a higher-than-normal degree of
scrutiny. Once identified, individual exposures are carefully monitored by the
Asset Quality Review Committee, which meets quarterly. In assessing the
adequacy of our allowance for credit losses, this group of senior officers
recommends the portion of credit exposures that should be charged off and the
amount of any provision for credit losses.

LEGAL RISK

Legal risk arises from the uncertainty of the enforceability, through legal or
judicial processes, of the obligations of J.P. Morgan's clients and
counterparties, including contractual provisions intended to reduce credit
exposure by providing for the offsetting or netting of mutual obligations.
Morgan seeks to remove or minimize such uncertainty through continuous
consultation with internal and external legal advisors in all countries in
which we conduct business.

FIDUCIARY AND AGENCY RISK

Fiduciaries and agents have obligations to act on behalf of others. Fiduciary or
agency risks exist in our investment management activities and to a lesser
extent in many of our other agency and brokerage activities. The firm has a
number of policies and procedures to ensure that our obligations to clients
are discharged faithfully and in compliance with applicable legal and regulatory
requirements. This includes setting policies with respect to the creation,
sale, and management of the firm's investment products, trade execution,
counterparty selection, and the evaluation of potential investment
opportunities.

EX-13 22nd Page of 116 TOC 1st Previous Next Bottom Just 22nd

OPERATIONAL RISK

Operational risk is the potential for loss caused by a breakdown in information,
communication, transaction processing, and settlement systems and procedures.
J.P. Morgan attempts to mitigate operational risk by maintaining a comprehensive
system of internal controls.

The objective of an internal control framework begins with the
identification and prioritization of business objectives, and the linkage of
these objectives to the business processes through which they are attained.
Morgan's business managers are responsible for establishing and maintaining an
appropriate system of internal controls after considering the risks of their
business and the standards and policies of the firm. Risks inherent in reaching
each objective are identified, and control objectives required to mitigate
those risks are established. Consistent with these control objectives,
we develop control procedures and standards, identify their impact on the
respective business processes, and implement them at the appropriate level.
Monitoring the effectiveness of our control procedures is a vital component of
this framework.

In addition to the establishment of a system of internal controls, we also
maintain key backup facilities worldwide, and update systems and equipment as
required in response to changes in business conditions and technology needs.
Contingency plans are executed and communicated throughout the firm on a regular
basis.

Our control environment encompasses all of the above elements and is
enhanced by the integrity and competence of our professionals, the way our
professionals are developed and supervised, and management's philosophy and
operating style. This comprehensive system of internal controls enables
management to ensure compliance with management policies and external
regulations.

EX-13 23rd Page of 116 TOC 1st Previous Next Bottom Just 23rd

FINANCIAL REVIEW

· Download Table

In millions 1995 1994 1993
-----------------------------------------------------------------

Net interest revenue . . . . . . . $ 2 003 $ 1 981 $ 1 772
Noninterest revenue . . . . . . . 3 901 3 536 4 499
Operating expenses . . . . . . . . (3 998) (3 692) (3 580)
Income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . (610) (610) (968)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
INCOME BEFORE ACCOUNTING CHANGE. . 1 296 1 215 1 723
Accounting change. . . . . . . . . - - (137)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Net income 1 296 1 215 1 586
-----------------------------------------------------------------

Primary earnings per common share

INCOME BEFORE ACCOUNTING CHANGE. . $ 6.42 $ 6.02 $ 8.48
Net income. . . . . . . . . . . . 6.42 6.02 7.80
-----------------------------------------------------------------

NET INTEREST REVENUE
[GRAPHIC APPEARS HERE]

Net interest revenue aggregates interest revenue and expense generated from
assets, liabilities, and off-balance-sheet activities. Net interest revenue
derived from instruments used in our Asset and Liability Management activities
is the largest contributor to net interest revenue. The Finance and Advisory and
Asset Management and Servicing sectors generate net interest revenue from loans
and other credit and deposit products. In addition, net interest revenue results
from various financial instruments used in our trading-related businesses,
primarily within the Sales and Trading sector. Net interest revenue is affected
by changes in interest rates, funding strategies, and the relative proportion
and composition of interest-bearing and noninterest-bearing financial
instruments. Trading-related net interest revenue has become increasingly
sensitive to these changes as our trading activities have increased. The levels
of equity capital and net noninterest-bearing liabilities reduce the
requirement to incur interest-bearing liabilities to fund the firm's activities.

Net interest revenue was $2,003 million in 1995, compared with $1,981
million in 1994 and $1,772 million in 1993. Net interest revenue included $66
million and $201 million in 1994 and 1993 respectively, primarily related to
past due interest claims from Brazil and Argentina. In 1994, the firm also
recorded $50 million of interest revenue associated with income tax refunds.
Excluding these items, net interest revenue was 7% higher in 1995 than in 1994.
This increase was primarily attributable to increased net interest revenue from
our Asset and Liability Management activities in the United States and Asia. Net
interest revenue associated with the Finance and Advisory sector also increased
in 1995, primarily due to increased net interest revenue from credit-related
products, somewhat offset by higher funding costs associated with our expanding
equities business. Net interest revenue attributable to the Sales and Trading
sector declined, primarily due to lower yields on fixed income securities offset
by higher net interest revenue from Latin American deposits and redeposits. Net
interest revenue related to the Asset Management and Servicing sector also
declined primarily from credit and deposit services. Net interest revenue
derived from the custody and cash services businesses disposed of in 1995
represented approximately 6% of consolidated net interest revenue in 1995.

Net interest revenue, excluding receipts related to past due interest and
interest on income tax refunds, increased 19% in 1994 compared with 1993. This
increase was primarily attributable to increased net interest revenue from the
Sales and Trading sector, reflecting higher trading-related net interest revenue
from European fixed income securities and emerging markets activities,
particularly in Brazil. Net interest revenue related to European and Asian Asset
and Liability Management activities also increased during 1994, while net
interest revenue associated with U.S. dollar activities declined. Partially
offsetting this increase in 1994 was lower net interest revenue associated with
the Finance and Advisory sector, primarily due to the reduced volume of credit-
related activities and a decrease in spreads due to the more competitive lending
environment.

EX-13 24th Page of 116 TOC 1st Previous Next Bottom Just 24th

Interest rate sensitivity

J.P. Morgan is exposed to interest rate risk related to the use of interest-
rate-sensitive assets, liabilities, and derivatives. While the matching of
assets and liabilities of similar interest rate sensitivity would reduce the
risk associated with interest rate changes, this approach would not allow the
firm to benefit from anticipated changes in interest rates. Net interest revenue
may be generated from our asset and liability management activities by creating
maturity and repricing imbalances between assets, liabilities, and derivatives.
The resulting interest-rate-sensitivity gap is the net effect of assets,
liabilities, and derivatives maturing or repricing in a given period.
Interest-rate-sensitivity gaps are adjusted by changing repricing profiles
through the use of derivatives as well as by changing funding strategies and
repositioning assets.

A liability sensitive position results when more liabilities than assets
reprice or mature within a given period. Under this scenario, as interest rates
decline, increased net interest revenue will be generated. Conversely, an asset
sensitive position results when more assets than liabilities reprice within a
given period; in this instance, net interest revenue would benefit from an
increasing interest rate environment. In addition to generating revenue from
maturity and repricing imbalances, net interest revenue may also be generated
by matching assets, liabilities, and derivatives of similar maturity and
repricing profiles at a positive margin.

The following table provides J.P. Morgan's interest-rate-sensitivity gaps
at December 31, 1995 and 1994, including the asset and liability interest-rate-
sensitivity gaps and the effect of derivatives on the gaps. The resulting
interest-rate-sensitivity gap is presented by U.S. dollar and non-U.S. dollar
currency components and reflects J.P. Morgan's market outlook at these points in
time. Significant variances in interest rate sensitivity may exist at other
dates not presented in the table. Amounts in parentheses reflect liability
sensitive positions.

· Enlarge/Download Table

By repricing or maturity dates
------------------------------
After six After one
Within months year but After
six but within within five
In millions months one year five years
----------- -------- ---------- --------- -------

DECEMBER 31, 1995
Asset and liability interest-rate-sensitivity gap...... $(3 530) $(2 403) $12 240 $3 037
Derivatives affecting interest rate sensitivity........ 8 384 (4 113) (7 262) 2 991
------- -------- -------- ------
Interest-rate-sensitivity gap (a)...................... 4 854 (6 516) 4 978 6 028
------- -------- -------- ------
(a) Components of interest-rate-sensitivity gap:
U.S. dollar................................ 2 017 (6 220) 5 180 3 580
Non-U.S. dollar *.......................... 2 837 (296) (202) 2 448
------- -------- -------- ------
Total...................................... 4 854 (6 516) 4 978 6 028
------- -------- -------- ------
DECEMBER 31, 1994

Asset and liability interest-rate-sensitivity gap...... (8 885) (811) 2 361 13 422
Derivatives affecting interest rate sensitivity........ 14 324 3 154 280 (17 757)
------- -------- -------- ------
Interest-rate-sensitivity gap (b)...................... 5 439 2 343 2 641 (4 335)
------- -------- -------- ------
(b) Components of interest-rate-sensitivity gap:
U.S. dollar................................ 17 359 2 772 (4 752) (4 259)
Non-U.S. dollar *.......................... (11 920) (429) 7 393 (76)
------- -------- -------- ------
Total...................................... 5 439 2 343 2 641 (4 335)
------- -------- -------- ------

* Primarily yen, deutsche mark, French franc, Belgian franc, and sterling
positions.

EX-13 25th Page of 116 TOC 1st Previous Next Bottom Just 25th

TRADING REVENUE

[GRAPHIC APPEARS HERE]

Trading revenue is generated primarily by activities included within the Sales
and Trading and Finance and Advisory sectors. Trading revenue increased 35% to
$1,376 million in 1995 from $1,019 million in 1994. Reported trading revenue
does not include net interest revenue associated with trading activities. The
methodology utilized to derive net interest revenue attributable to trading
activities includes accruals on interest-earning and interest-bearing trading-
related positions as well as allocated amounts reflecting the cost or benefit,
based on short-term interest rates, of funding net trading-related positions.
Trading-related net interest revenue should be considered when evaluating
trading results since the firm manages its trading activities based on combined
revenues.

The following table presents trading revenue and net interest revenue
associated with the firm's trading activities, in both developed and emerging
markets, disaggregated by principal product groupings. The table does not
represent total revenues generated by business activities as discussed in the
Five business sectors. For example, underwriting revenues and equities
commissions, which are reported in Investment banking revenue and Operational
service fees respectively on the Consolidated statement of income, are not
included below.

· Enlarge/Download Table

Fixed Foreign Com- Proprietary
In millions Income Equities Exchange modities Unit Total
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

1995
Trading revenue $ 668 $ 249 $253 $42 $ 164 $1 376
Net interest revenue (expense) 201 (112) 22 - 20 131
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Combined revenue 869 137 275 42 184 1 507
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1994
Trading revenue 766 115 168 82 (112) 1 019
Net interest revenue (expense) 299 (20) 10 (8) 1 282
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Combined revenue 1 065 95 178 74 (111) 1 301
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1993
Trading revenue 1 290 199 315 57 198 2 059
Net interest revenue (expense) 182 (41) 2 - (1) 142
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Combined revenue 1 472 158 317 57 197 2 201
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Combined revenue of $1,507 million in 1995 increased $206 million from 1994 due
primarily to higher proprietary unit revenues and strong client demand across a
range of the firm's market-making activities. Combined revenue of $1,301 million
in 1994 decreased $900 million from $2,201 million in 1993 due primarily to
defensive investor participation in the markets globally and losses in the
firm's proprietary unit.

Fixed Income

Fixed Income includes the results of making markets in U.S. and foreign
government securities, debt instruments in emerging markets, interest rate and
currency swaps, options and other derivative instruments, money market
instruments, U.S. government agency securities, and corporate debt securities.

Combined revenue of $869 million in 1995 decreased $196 million from 1994.
While demand for risk management products was higher, revenues declined from
1994 due to losses in positions arising from some client activities. We also
recorded losses from mortgage-backed securities in 1995 as we reduced inventory
positions in a strategic realignment of these activities. Partially offsetting
these declines were higher results from emerging markets activities.

EX-13 26th Page of 116 TOC 1st Previous Next Bottom Just 26th

Combined revenue of $1,065 million in 1994 decreased $407 million from
exceptional 1993 revenues. The decrease in 1994 was due primarily to lower
client volumes in fixed income securities, primarily in Europe, and less
effective positioning in Latin American debt markets.

Equities

Equities includes the results of making markets in global equity securities and
equity derivatives such as swaps, options, futures, and forward contracts.

Combined revenue of $137 million in 1995 increased $42 million from 1994
primarily due to increased client demand for equity derivatives.

Combined revenue declined $63 million in 1994 from $158 million in 1993
resulting from lower equity securities trading revenues.

Foreign Exchange

Foreign Exchange includes the results of making markets in spot, options, and
short-term interest rate products, including forwards and forward rate
agreements in a number of currencies.

Combined revenue increased $97 million to $275 million in 1995 due
primarily to an increase in client demand.

Combined revenue declined to $178 million in 1994 from $317 million in
1993, as positioning was less effective in uncertain markets.

Commodities

Commodities includes the results of making markets in spot, forwards, options,
and swaps, and advising clients on developing hedging, investment, and
commodity-linked financing strategies. Revenues related to physical commodity
services such as settlement of physical trades in the various metal and oil
markets and metal borrowing and lending services are also included.

Combined revenue of $42 million in 1995 decreased $32 million from the
exceptional 1994 results due primarily to declines in base metals revenues.

Combined revenue of $74 million in 1994 increased $17 million from 1993.
The increase was due to continued penetration of energy and base metal markets
and from higher market-making activity in commodity derivatives.

Proprietary Unit

In addition to our client-focused trading activities, we have a separate
proprietary unit that engages in transactions for our own account across all
markets.

Combined revenue of $184 million in 1995 reflected gains, primarily in
Asian markets, compared with losses of ($111) million in 1994, primarily in
European markets.

Combined revenue in 1994 decreased $308 million from $197 million in 1993.

TRADING-RELATED ASSETS AND LIABILITIES

· Enlarge/Download Table

In billions: Average balances 1995 1994 1993
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Assets:
Trading account assets........................................ $68.0 $62.0 $37.3
Securities purchased under agreements to resell............... 31.6 32.1 29.7
Securities borrowed........................................... 15.2 15.6 14.1
Liabilities:
Trading account liabilities................................... 45.2 38.6 21.3
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase................ 40.1 45.5 47.3
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Trading account assets, Securities purchased under agreements to resell (resale
agreements), Securities borrowed, Trading account liabilities, and Securities
sold under agreements to repurchase (repurchase agreements) can fluctuate by
large amounts daily. The level of trading-related assets and liabilities is
influenced by client needs as well as market opportunities.

EX-13 27th Page of 116 TOC 1st Previous Next Bottom Just 27th

The firm uses resale agreements and securities borrowed to settle short
trading positions and to meet the inventory financing needs of clients. We use
repurchase agreements as a source of short-term financing for trading-related
positions and as one source of financing for the debt investment securities
portfolio. Effective December 31, 1994, the firm adopted Financial Accounting
Standards Board Interpretation No. 41 (FIN No. 41), Offsetting of Amounts
Related to Certain Repurchase and Reverse Repurchase Agreements. The adoption
did not have a material impact on 1994 resale and repurchase agreement amounts.

Trading account assets and liabilities are mainly composed of U.S. Treasury
and foreign government securities, trading-related derivatives, and corporate
debt and equity securities. Average trading account assets grew in 1995 as a
result of increased holdings of foreign government and corporate debt and equity
securities, reflecting the continued expansion of our activities within the
Sales and Trading and Finance and Advisory sectors. In addition, due to the
growth in our securities businesses in the United States and Europe in the past
several years, average balances for resale agreements, securities borrowed, and
repurchase agreements have increased to meet the needs of clients and to profit
from interest rate spreads. The average balance of trading-related assets
represented 64% of average total assets in 1995 and 1994, compared with 55% in
1993.

The increase in the average balance of trading-related assets and
liabilities in 1994 as compared with 1993 was primarily related to increased
trading account assets and liabilities resulting from the adoption of Financial
Accounting Standards Board Interpretation No. 39 (FIN No. 39), Offsetting of
Amounts Related to Certain Contracts. The adoption of FIN No. 39 increased both
trading account assets and liabilities by approximately $13 billion at December
31, 1994. If FIN No. 39 had been in effect at December 31, 1993, trading account
assets and liabilities would have been increased by approximately $14 billion.
The growth in 1994 was also due to the continued expansion of our trading
activities within the Sales and Trading sector.

DERIVATIVES

[GRAPHIC APPEARS HERE]

In general terms, derivative instruments are contracts or agreements whose value
is derived from interest rates, foreign exchange rates, prices of securities, or
financial or commodity indices. Derivatives include swaps, futures, forwards,
and option contracts.

Derivatives are generally either negotiated over-the-counter contracts or
standardized contracts executed on an exchange. Standardized exchange-traded
derivatives include futures and option contracts. Negotiated over-the-counter
derivatives include forwards, swaps, and option contracts. Over-the-counter
derivatives are generally not traded like securities; however, in the normal
course of business, with the agreement of the original counterparty, they may
be terminated or assigned to another counterparty. The timing of cash receipts
and payments related to derivatives is generally determined by contractual
agreement.

J.P. Morgan's competitive strength in derivatives activities results from
our strong capital base, expertise developed over many years, global
distribution capabilities, long-standing client relationships, sophisticated
research and technological support, and integrated approach to these activities.

J.P. Morgan utilizes derivatives in its trading and asset and liability
management activities. As part of our trading activities, we act as a dealer in
derivative instruments to satisfy the risk management needs of our clients by
structuring transactions that allow clients to manage their exposure to interest
rates, foreign exchange rates, prices of securities, and financial or commodity
indices. In addition, we assume trading positions based on our market
expectations and to benefit from price differentials between instruments and
markets. We also utilize derivatives as hedges of trading instruments.
Derivative instruments used for trading purposes primarily include interest rate
swaps, foreign exchange forward contracts, interest rate futures, forward rate
agreements, commodity forwards, equity swaps, and purchased and written interest
rate options.

As an end user, J.P. Morgan utilizes derivative instruments in the
execution of its asset and liability management strategies. Derivatives used for
these purposes primarily include interest rate swaps, foreign exchange forward
contracts, forward rate agreements, interest rate futures, and debt securities
forwards. Derivatives are used to hedge exposures to interest rate or currency
fluctuations, primarily on or related to

EX-13 28th Page of 116 TOC 1st Previous Next Bottom Just 28th

debt investment securities, and to modify the interest rate characteristics of
related balance sheet instruments, principally loans, short-term borrowings,
and long-term debt. In addition, we utilize derivatives to adjust our overall
interest rate risk profile, primarily through the use of risk-adjusting swaps.
These swaps do not contain leverage or embedded option features and are used to
replicate the cash flows of nonamortizing cash instruments.

As with balance sheet financial instruments, derivatives are subject to
market and credit risk. As discussed in Risk management, we evaluate the risks
associated with derivatives in much the same way as the risks associated with
balance sheet financial instruments. However, unlike balance sheet financial
instruments, where the credit exposure is generally represented by the notional
or principal value, the credit exposure associated with derivatives is generally
a small fraction of the notional value of the instrument and is represented by
the positive market value of the derivative instrument.

The following table presents the percentages of credit exposure associated
with all derivatives by counterparty credit quality, based on J.P. Morgan's
internal credit ratings. J.P. Morgan's internal rating definitions are
analogous to those of public rating agencies in the United States. Ratings of
AAA, AA, A, and BBB represent investment grade ratings and ratings of BB and
below represent noninvestment grade ratings. The percentages presented below
do not consider the credit enhancement effect of collateral securing these
instruments.

· Download Table

Total
credit
Percentage at December 31, 1995 exposure
------------------------------- --------

AAA, AA..................................................... 45%
A........................................................... 38
BBB......................................................... 12
BB and below................................................ 5
--------
Total....................................................... 100%
--------

The following tables provide the aggregate notional amount of each category of
derivative financial instruments and the contractual maturities for the 1995
balances. For detail of the notional amounts segregated by trading and asset
and liability management activities, refer to Note 9 to the financial
statements, Off-balance-sheet financial instruments. The following tables also
provide the total amount of credit exposure, after considering the benefit of
$27.7 billion, $12.7 billion, and $11.6 billion of master netting agreements
in effect at December 31, 1995, 1994, and 1993, respectively, and the
contractual maturities for the 1995 balances. We increased our use of master
netting agreements in 1995 as our market-making activities continued to increase
and as the legal enforceability of these agreements expanded to new
jurisdictions.

Interest rate and currency swaps

· Enlarge/Download Table

After one After five
Within year but years but
one within within After ten Total
In billions: December 31 year five ten years 1995 1994 1993
------------------------ ------ --------- --------- --------- ------- ------ ------

Notional amount..................... $497.3 $766.9 $228.2 $23.2 $1 515.6 $974.9 $663.7
Credit exposure..................... 2.3 4.8 4.3 1.0 12.4 10.9 11.5
------ --------- --------- --------- -------- ------ ------

A swap is a contractual agreement in which a series of cash flows are exchanged
at specified intervals. The notional principal is not exchanged for interest
rate swaps, but is generally exchanged for currency swaps. The notional amount
of swaps, particularly interest rate swaps, grew during 1995 and 1994 as client
demand for risk management tools increased.

EX-13 29th Page of 116 TOC 1st Previous Next Bottom Just 29th

Foreign exchange spot, forward, and futures contracts

· Enlarge/Download Table

Notional amount..................... $455.4 $6.4 - - $461.8 $397.7 $315.9
Credit exposure..................... 3.0 0.3 - - 3.3 3.6 4.1
------ --------- --------- --------- ------- ------ ------

Foreign exchange contracts involve an agreement to exchange the currency of one
country for the currency of another country at an agreed-upon price and
settlement date. The contracts reported above primarily include forwards. The
increase in notional amounts of foreign exchange contracts during 1995 and 1994
reflects increased activity in foreign exchange forward contracts in line with
our increased market-making activities.

Interest rate futures, forward rate agreements, and debt securities forwards

· Enlarge/Download Table

Notional amount..................... $321.1 $92.5 $1.8 - $415.4 $426.5 $235.5
Credit exposure..................... 0.4 0.1 - - 0.5 0.2 0.4
------ --------- --------- --------- ------- ------ ------

Interest rate futures, with a notional amount of $180.5 billion, $210.4 billion,
and $119.8 billion at December 31, 1995, 1994, and 1993, respectively, are
standardized exchange-traded agreements to receive or deliver a specified
financial instrument at a specified future date and price. The credit risk
associated with futures contracts is limited due to the daily settlement of open
contracts with the exchange on which the instrument is traded. The contracts
reported above also include forward rate agreements and debt securities
forwards. A forward rate agreement is an agreement that provides for payment or
receipt of the difference between a specified interest rate and a reference rate
at a future settlement date. Debt securities forwards include to-be-announced
and when-issued securities contracts. These contracts represent agreements to
purchase or sell fixed income securities and are executed prior to issuance of
the security.

Commodity and equity swaps, forward, and futures contracts

· Enlarge/Download Table

Notional amount..................... $49.6 $14.4 $1.1 - $65.1 $43.9 $35.0
Credit exposure..................... 1.1 0.3 - - 1.4 1.1 0.4
------ --------- --------- --------- ------- ------ ------

The contracts shown above primarily include swaps and futures in the commodity
and equity markets, and commodity forward agreements. The increase in notional
amounts during 1995 reflects increased activity in equity contracts in line with
our strategy to expand our market-making capabilities.

EX-13 30th Page of 116 TOC 1st Previous Next Bottom Just 30th

Option contracts

· Enlarge/Download Table

Notional amount:
Purchased option
contracts..................... $286.4 $152.0 $24.6 $1.8 $464.8 $280.6 $222.2
Written option
contracts..................... 325.5 167.1 29.2 2.2 524.0 348.9 181.2
------ --------- --------- --------- ------- ------ ------

An option contract provides the option purchaser with the right but not the
obligation to buy or sell the underlying item at a set price during a period or
at a specified date. The option writer is obligated to buy or sell the
underlying item if the option purchaser chooses to exercise. The options
reported above include contracts in the interest rate, foreign exchange, equity,
and commodity markets. Interest rate options also include caps and floors. For
caps and floors, the notional amounts are used to calculate periodic cash flows.
The notional amount of options, particularly interest rate options, grew in 1995
and 1994, primarily due to increased market-making activities.

Option contracts are either negotiated over-the-counter or standardized
contracts executed on an exchange. The notional amount of purchased options
executed on an exchange amounted to $137.4 billion and those negotiated
over-the-counter amounted to $327.4 billion at December 31, 1995. Written
options executed on an exchange amounted to $162.4 billion and those negotiated
over-the-counter amounted to $361.6 billion at December 31, 1995.

Credit exposure exists for purchased options and is measured as the
positive market value of the option contract. At December 31, 1995, the credit
exposure of purchased option contracts was $5.2 billion compared with $3.7
billion at December 31, 1994, and $4.3 billion at December 31, 1993. There is
no credit exposure associated with written option contracts, as these contracts
represent obligations, rather than assets, of J.P. Morgan.

INVESTMENT BANKING REVENUE
[GRAPHIC APPEARS HERE]

Investment banking revenue is earned globally by providing strategic and
financial advice and by arranging financing for clients and includes advisory,
loan syndication, and underwriting revenues.

Investment banking revenue of $584 million, which is primarily reported in
the Finance and Advisory sector, increased 35% to record levels in 1995, as we
benefited from increased global investment banking activity. Advisory and
syndication fees rose 27% to $395 million, primarily from higher advisory fees
as merger and acquisition activity reached record levels in 1995 and we
participated in transactions on behalf of a broad range of clients around the
globe. Revenues from the arrangement of syndicated lending facilities also
rose in 1995 due to higher activity. Underwriting revenue increased 52% to
$189 million in 1995, as debt and equity securities underwriting activities
grew.

Investment banking revenue decreased 18% to $434 million in 1994 from 1993.
Underwriting revenue decreased 49% in 1994 to $124 million as global
underwriting activities throughout the industry decreased because of the
unfavorable interest rate environment. Advisory and syndication fees rose
8% in 1994 to $310 million, as revenue related to the arrangement of syndicated
lending facilities increased due to higher volumes.

EX-13 31st Page of 116 TOC 1st Previous Next Bottom Just 31st

CREDIT-RELATED FEES
[GRAPHIC APPEARS HERE]

Credit-related fees are earned from commitments to extend credit, standby
letters of credit and guarantees, and securities lending activities and are
recorded primarily in the Finance and Advisory and Asset Management and
Servicing sectors. Approximately 12% of credit-related fees, primarily
securities lending fees, recorded in 1995 were attributable to the firm's
custody businesses that were sold in 1995 and are reported in Corporate Items.

Credit-related fees of $162 million decreased 21% in 1995 compared with
1994 as we continued to earn lower fees from securities lending. Fees earned
from commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit were down
slightly in 1995 compared to 1994 as higher average volumes were offset by
continued competitive pricing.

Credit-related fees of $204 million in 1994 decreased from $224 million in
1993 primarily due to lower fees earned from securities lending. Fees earned
from standby letters of credit also declined due to lower average volumes and
more competitive pricing during 1994.

CREDIT-RELATED FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

Credit-related financial instruments include loans, commitments to extend
credit, and standby letters of credit and guarantees. These instruments
primarily result from the activities engaged in by our Finance and Advisory
sector. The maximum credit risk associated with credit-related financial
instruments is measured by the contractual amounts of these instruments. For
off-balance-sheet credit-related financial instruments this balance represents
the amount at risk should the contract be fully drawn upon, the client default,
and any existing collateral become worthless.

The following table presents the percentages of credit exposure associated
with credit-related financial instruments by counterparty credit quality, based
on J.P. Morgan's internal credit ratings. J.P. Morgan's internal rating
definitions are analogous to those of public rating agencies in the
United States. Ratings of AAA, AA, A, and BBB represent investment grade ratings
and ratings of BB and below represent noninvestment grade ratings. The
percentages presented below do not consider the credit enhancement effect of
collateral securing these instruments. Overall, approximately 86% of the total
credit exposure at December 31, 1995, was with counterparties considered to be
of investment grade quality, based on our internal ratings. At December 31,
1994, approximately 90% of the total credit exposure was with investment grade
counterparties.

· Download Table

Total
credit
Percentage at December 31, 1995 exposure
------------------------------- --------

AAA, AA.............................. 23%
A.................................... 41
BBB.................................. 22
BB and below......................... 14
--------
Total................................ 100%
--------

Loans

The extension of credit, including loans, remains one of the many ways we
provide our clients with the broad array of financial services that they
require. Our portfolio of loans is diversified by borrower, industry, and
geographic area. At December 31 for each of the past three years, the loan
portfolio consisted mainly of shorter-term outstandings, with nearly 50% of
total loans maturing within one year and approximately 90% maturing within
five years.

Commitments to extend credit

Commitments to extend credit are contracts to lend money to a client in the
future under specific terms and conditions. A majority of, and increases in,
J.P. Morgan's commitments during the past three years relate to those issued to
support clients' commercial paper programs.

EX-13 32nd Page of 116 TOC 1st Previous Next Bottom Just 32nd

Standby letters of credit and guarantees

Standbys are contracts issued to support clients' obligations to third parties,
the beneficiaries. In the event a client fails to perform a contractual
obligation, payment is made to the beneficiary upon demand. The client is
required to reimburse J.P. Morgan for any payment made in connection with the
standbys.

The following table provides the contractual amount of commitments to extend
credit and standby letters of credit and guarantees and a maturity profile of
such instruments by contractual maturity for 1995.

· Enlarge/Download Table

After one
Within one year but More than Total
In billions: December 31 year within five five years 1995 1994 1993
------------------------ ---------- ----------- ---------- ----- ----- ----

Contractual amount:
Commitments to
extend credit................. $17.5 $31.8 $5.8 $55.1 $44.6 $39.0
Standby letters of credit and
guarantees.................... 6.6 3.9 1.2 11.7 9.9 10.5
---------- ---------- ---------- ------ ----- -----

Securities lending indemnifications

Securities lending indemnifications are contractual obligations under which J.P.
Morgan guarantees that a third party lender of securities will be protected
against a borrower's failure to return such securities. J.P. Morgan, acting as
agent, receives from the borrower collateral, in the form of cash, securities,
or letters of credit, that generally equals the market value of the securities
borrowed plus some specified margin. The borrowers of these securities are
typically nonbank financial institutions. Generally, securities are lent for an
average period of less than 30 days. The contractual amount of securities
lending indemnifications at December 31, 1995, declined as a result of the sale
of the firm's custody businesses in 1995.

· Download Table

In billions: December 31 1995 1994 1993
------------------------ ---- ----- ----

Contractual amount...................... $1.0 $19.5 $26.4
---- ----- ----

At December 31, 1995, 1994, and 1993, J.P. Morgan held cash and other
collateral of $1.1 billion, $19.4 billion, and $26.4 billion respectively in
support of securities lending indemnifications.

INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT FEES
[GRAPHIC APPEARS HERE]

Investment management fees are derived from providing investment management
services to institutions and private clients and include fees from the
administration of trusts and estates. These activities are primarily reported
in the Asset Management and Servicing sector.

Investment management fees increased 11% to $574 million in 1995 compared
with 1994, reflecting an increase in assets under management primarily from
institutional net new business.

Investment management fees increased 11% to $517 million in 1994 compared
with 1993. The increase was primarily due to net new business from both domestic
and international clients that resulted in higher institutional assets under
management.

OPERATIONAL SERVICE FEES

Operational service fees are earned from providing custody, clearing, and
brokerage of securities and futures as well as trust and agency and cash
management services and are generally reported in the Asset Management and
Servicing and Finance and Advisory sectors. Revenues generated by the firm's
custody and cash services businesses represent approximately 34% of operational
service fees for the twelve months ended December 31, 1995, and are reported in
Corporate Items.

EX-13 33rd Page of 116 TOC 1st Previous Next Bottom Just 33rd

Operational service fees were $546 million in 1995, unchanged from 1994.
Equities commissions revenue increased due to increased market penetration and
volumes. The increase was offset by lower revenue from custody, clearing, and
trust services resulting from the disposition of businesses in 1995 and 1994.

The 11% increase in operational service fees in 1994 compared with 1993 was
primarily due to higher futures and equity commissions and higher custody and
clearing fees.

[GRAPHIC APPEARS HERE]

NET INVESTMENT SECURITIES GAINS

Net investment securities gains result from sales of securities from the debt
investment securities portfolio, made in connection with our asset and
liability management activities, consistent with our longer-term view of
changes in global interest rates. In 1995, 1994, and 1993 net investment
securities gains were $21 million, $122 million, and $323 million respectively
and resulted primarily from sales of foreign and U.S. government and government
agency securities. Gross realized gains and gross realized losses were $384
million and $363 million in 1995, $429 million and $307 million in 1994, and
$599 million and $276 million in 1993 respectively.

OTHER REVENUE

Other revenue includes net realized gains and losses from the equity investment
portfolio and write-downs for other-than-temporary impairments in the value of
such securities. These net gains are reported in the Equity Investments sector.
Other revenue also includes dividend income and the results of certain
miscellaneous transactions.

Other revenue of $638 million in 1995 included net equity investment
securities gains of $485 million, primarily related to the realization of gains
on a portion of the firm's equity investment in Columbia/HCA Healthcare
Corporation. In addition, other revenue included a gain of $40 million
on the sales of the firm's global and local custody and U.S. commercial paper
issuing and paying agency businesses. Gross sales proceeds of $260 million were
largely offset by nonrecurring costs of $220 million associated with the exit
from these businesses. The costs included a real estate charge of $110 million
as a result of the rationalization of the firm's space requirements coincident
with the disposition of these businesses and the corresponding reduction in
personnel. Equity earnings from affiliates and dividend income also contributed
to miscellaneous net revenue.

Other revenue of $694 million in 1994 reflected $606 million of net equity
investment securities gains primarily related to the realization of gains on a
portion of the firm's equity investment in Columbia/HCA Healthcare Corporation,
$54 million related to the gain on the sale of our domestic corporate trust
business, and $56 million of hedging losses from the management of nontrading
foreign currency exposures.

OPERATING EXPENSES

· Download Table

In millions 1995 1994 1993
----------- ------ ------ ------

Employee compensation and benefits .. $2 498 $2 217 $2 221
Net occupancy........................ 322 275 391
Technology and communications........ 671 645 512
Other expenses....................... 507 555 456
------ ------ ------
Total operating expenses............. 3 998 3 692 3 580
------ ------ ------

J.P. Morgan's strategy for expense management, which is critical to the firm's
goal of maximizing long-term profitability, focuses on making disciplined
investments and ensuring maximum productivity in, as well as accountability for,
existing activities. As part of this process we review our business activities
to ensure that they remain important to our clients and provide the firm with an
appropriate return on investment. In 1995 we embarked on an effort to lower the
growth rate in expenses and to expand accountability for each business as well
as the corporate infrastructure. Our expense management efforts will continue
into 1996, ensuring that the level of expenses is consistent with the firm's
overall strategy.

EX-13 34th Page of 116 TOC 1st Previous Next Bottom Just 34th

Total operating expenses increased 8% to $3,998 million in 1995. The
weakening in the U.S. dollar's value accounted for 2 percentage points of the
increase. Employee compensation and benefits expense rose; however, expenses
other than employee compensation and benefits were essentially flat. In 1994,
total operating expenses increased 3% to $3,692 million as compared with 1993.
Operating expenses in 1993 included a special charge of $120 million primarily
related to real estate and relocation initiatives. Excluding the special charge,
operating expenses increased 7% in 1994 from 1993.

Employee compensation and benefits

Employee compensation and benefits, which represented 62% of total operating
expenses in 1995, is composed of salaries, incentive compensation, and benefits.
An essential component of our success is the ability to hire and retain the most
competent and highly skilled professionals. In this regard, we compensate
employees in accordance with their performance and that of the firm. A
significant component of the firm's senior officers' compensation is tied to the
firm's results with a portion paid in restricted stock in order to align their
compensation with longer-term stockholder results.

Employee compensation and benefits expense, excluding a special charge of
$55 million related to expense management initiatives, increased 10% in 1995
compared with 1994. The increase was primarily due to higher incentive
compensation linked to improved earnings and higher salary expense reflecting
the full-year impact of the 1994 growth in staff levels. At December 31, 1995,
the total number of staff was 15,613 as compared with 17,055 employees at
December 31, 1994, and 15,193 employees at December 31, 1993. Employee
compensation and benefits expense in 1994 was flat compared with 1993 as higher
salary expense related to an increase in staff was offset by a decrease in
incentive compensation and profit-sharing accruals in line with lower earnings

In 1995, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 123, Accounting for Stock-based
Compensation, applicable to financial statements for fiscal years beginning
after December 15, 1995. This standard permits either the recognition of
compensation cost for the estimated fair value of employee stock-based
compensation arrangements on the date of grant, or the disclosure in the notes
to the financial statements of the pro forma effects on net income and earnings
per share, determined as if the fair value-based method had been applied in
measuring compensation cost. J.P. Morgan will adopt this standard for the year
ended December 31, 1996, and intends to elect the disclosure option.

Net occupancy

Net occupancy increased 17% to $322 million in 1995 compared with 1994,
reflecting the full-year impact of our 1994 expansions in new and existing
locations. Net occupancy decreased 30% to $275 million in 1994 compared with
1993, primarily due to the special charge of $110 million incurred in 1993
relating to the utilization of our office space in New York and several other
locations.

Technology and communications

Reported technology and communications expense includes consulting, equipment,
software, and market information costs in connection with supporting computer
processing, trading, and desktop professional systems and communications. Our
total investment in technology and communications encompasses these costs as
well as other technology-related costs, primarily compensation and benefits
costs for systems and communications specialists employed by J.P. Morgan.

In managing our technology and communications spending, we make decisions
regarding the most appropriate use of our resources. In recent years, we have
taken steps to utilize these resources in a more flexible manner. We increased
the use of consultants and other external resources to meet our technology and
communications needs. The use of external resources in delivering technology
provides greater flexibility in our cost structure, enabling us to better
manage our costs as business conditions change. It also allows management to
focus on the firm's business activities and initiatives while expediting
delivery of the latest technologies.

EX-13 35th Page of 116 TOC 1st Previous Next Bottom Just 35th

[GRAPHIC APPEARS HERE]

Reported technology and communications expense increased 4% during 1995 to
$671 million, as compared to an increase of 26% in 1994 from 1993, reflecting
our focus in 1995 on the highest-priority projects. Increases in 1995 primarily
resulted from higher depreciation and increased usage of external resources and
market information services. Increases in 1994 compared with 1993 primarily
resulted from costs of additional consultants and external resources, the
expansion of communication networks, higher depreciation of desktop systems and
data processing equipment, and increased usage of market information services.

Total technology and communications spending, which includes other
technology-related costs, primarily employee compensation and benefits, was
$1,040 million in 1995, $984 million in 1994, and $808 million in 1993.
Spending on technology and communications increased 6% in 1995 from 1994, and
increased 22% in 1994 from 1993.

Other expenses

Other expenses include travel, professional fees and costs for outside services,
brokerage fees, taxes other than income taxes, and educational costs. Other
expenses declined 9% in 1995, reflecting a reduction in travel-related expenses
and in costs incurred for outside services, including advertising and promotion
fees and employment agency fees.

The 22% increase in other expenses in 1994 compared with 1993 was primarily
due to increased business activities, such as travel expenses; brokerage fees
due to higher business volume; taxes other than income taxes; and employment
agency fees related to the significant growth in personnel.

INCOME TAXES

Income tax expense of $610 million in 1995 was unchanged from 1994, reflecting
an increase in pretax income, offset by a lower effective tax rate. Income tax
expense decreased $358 million in 1994 compared with 1993, reflecting lower
pretax income and a lower effective tax rate. The effective tax rate for 1995,
1994, and 1993 was 32.0%, 33.4%, and 36.0% respectively, excluding the
cumulative effect of adopting SFAS No. 106, Employers' Accounting for
Postretirement Benefits Other Than Pensions, in 1993.

ALLOWANCE FOR CREDIT LOSSES

· Enlarge/Download Table

In millions 1995 1994 1993
----------- ------- ------- --------

Charge-offs:
Commercial and industrial...................................... $ (39) $ (37) $ (82)
Other.......................................................... (16) (17) (41)
Restructuring countries........................................ - (18) (37)
Recoveries.......................................................... 54 45 60
Allowance for credit losses, December 31............................ 1 130 1 131 1 157
------- ------- --------

No provision for credit losses was deemed necessary in 1995, 1994, or 1993.
In assessing the probability of losses that have not yet been identified and the
adequacy of the allowance, we have taken into consideration economic conditions;
regulatory requirements; our historical experience; concentrations of risk by
country, industry, product, and client; and the relatively large size of many of
our credit exposures given our wholesale banking orientation.

Charge-offs in 1995 and 1994, other than those for restructuring countries,
were $55 million and $54 million respectively, related to relatively few
borrowers primarily in the U.S., and were diversified by industry.

EX-13 36th Page of 116 TOC 1st Previous Next Bottom Just 36th

Restructuring-country charge-offs, including charges resulting from sales
and swaps of loans, have declined significantly over the past several years, and
there were no charge-offs related to restructuring countries in 1995.

NONPERFORMING ASSETS

Total nonperforming assets, net of charge-offs, are presented in the following
table:

· Download Table

In millions: December 31 1995 1994 1993
------------------------ ------ ------ ------

Impaired loans:
Commercial and industrial... $ 67 $ 136 $ 182
Other....................... 48 81 92
------ ------ ------
115 217 274
Restructuring countries.......... 2 2 8
------ ------ ------
Total impaired loans............. 117 219 282
Other nonperforming assets....... 1 1 13
------ ------ ------
Total nonperforming assets....... 118 220 295
------ ------ ------

Effective January 1, 1995, J.P. Morgan adopted SFAS No. 114 and subsequent
amendment SFAS No. 118, both entitled Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of
a Loan, which prescribe criteria for recognition of loan impairment as well as
methods to measure impairment of certain loans, including loans whose terms were
modified in troubled debt restructurings. J.P. Morgan defines an impaired loan
as any loan on which the accrual of interest is discontinued because the
contractual payment of principal or interest has become 90 days past due or
management has serious doubts about future collectibility of principal or
interest, even though the loans are currently performing (i.e., nonaccrual
loans). Factors involved in determining impairment include, but are not limited
to, expected future cash flows, financial condition of the borrower, and current
economic conditions. Consistent with prior periods, all of J.P. Morgan's
impaired loans at December 31, 1995, were on nonaccrual status. Accordingly,
comparisons of current balances with those of prior periods are not affected by
the implementation of SFAS No. 114 and 118. The adoption of these standards did
not have a material impact on J.P. Morgan's financial statements and did not
affect its charge-off policy.

Impaired loans declined $102 million during 1995 as new classifications
were more than offset by loan repayments, loan sales, and charge-offs. In 1994,
impaired loans declined $63 million as new classifications were more than
offset by repayments, sales, charge-offs, and the return of certain loans to
performing status.

SOURCES OF FUNDS

J.P. Morgan's strong capital base and international presence have allowed us to
develop a global funding base consisting of a variety of sources. As a result,
J.P. Morgan is able to limit its dependence on any individual source and choose
the funding instruments that best meet management's strategies. Our sources
include interest-bearing and noninterest-bearing deposits, commercial paper,
bank notes, trading account liabilities, repurchase agreements, federal funds
purchased, long-term debt, and stockholders' equity. In determining the most
appropriate funding source at a particular point in time, management considers
market conditions, prevailing interest rates, liquidity needs, and our desired
maturity profile.

· Download Table

In billions: Average balances 1995 1994 1993
----------------------------- ----- ----- -----

Noninterest-bearing deposits.......... $ 4.7 $ 5.2 $ 5.9
Interest-bearing deposits............. 43.8 39.9 34.4
Commercial paper...................... 2.8 4.2 3.4
Other liabilities for borrowed money.. 12.1 10.3 11.2
----- ----- -----

EX-13 37th Page of 116 TOC 1st Previous Next Bottom Just 37th

Noninterest-bearing deposits are mainly composed of items in the process of
collection and clients' compensating balances placed with us in lieu of fees for
operational services. Interest-bearing deposits are short-term in nature and
central to our operations. Other liabilities for borrowed money primarily
include bank notes, term federal funds purchased, and other short-term
borrowings. Information about trading account liabilities and repurchase
agreements, important sources of funding, is provided in the Trading-related
assets and liabilities section.

Long-term debt

· Download Table

In billions: December 31 1995 1994 1993
------------------------ ----- ----- -----

Long-term debt qualifying as risk-based capital...... $ 3.6 $ 3.2 $ 2.5
Long-term debt not qualifying as risk-based capital.. 5.7 3.6 2.8
----- ----- -----
9.3 6.8 5.3
----- ----- -----

Taking advantage of favorable market conditions for raising long-term funds, in
1995 we issued $3.8 billion of long-term debt, of which approximately $695
million qualified as risk-based capital. Offsetting the additions to long-term
debt were approximately $511 million of maturities during 1995 and early
redemptions at par of $800 million of debt.

Additions in 1994 included the issuance of $2.4 billion of long-term debt,
of which approximately $950 million qualified as risk-based capital. Offsetting
the additions were approximately $970 million of maturities during 1994.

STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY

· Download Table

Dollars in billions: December 31 1995 1994 1993
-------------------------------- ----- ----- -----

Common stockholders' equity.................... $10.0 $ 9.1 $ 9.4
Total stockholders' equity..................... 10.5 9.6 9.9

Total stockholders' equity to year-end assets.. 5.7% 6.2% 7.4%
----- ----- -----

Common and total stockholders' equity increased in 1995 due primarily to the
retention of earnings in excess of common and preferred dividends and higher
unrealized gains on investment securities, net of taxes. Common and total
stockholders' equity decreased in 1994 as a result of lower unrealized gains on
investment securities, net of taxes, and an increase in treasury stock
purchased. The decrease was partially offset by the retention of earnings in
excess of common and preferred stock dividends.

In 1995, the ratio of total stockholders' equity to year-end assets
decreased as a result of the growth of $30 billion in year-end assets. The ratio
of total stockholders' equity to year-end assets decreased in 1994 as a result
of the adoption in 1994 of FIN No. 39, which caused both assets and liabilities
to increase by approximately $13 billion at December 31, 1994.

During 1995 and 1994, the firm purchased approximately 4 million and 7
million shares respectively of common stock to reduce the dilutive impact on
earnings per share of the firm's employee benefit plans. In December 1995, the
Board of Directors approved the purchase of up to 7 million additional shares of
J.P. Morgan common stock for the same purpose. These shares may be purchased
periodically in 1996 or beyond in the open market or through privately
negotiated transactions.

During February 1996, J.P. Morgan issued $200 million of perpetual 6 5/8%
cumulative preferred stock, series H, with a stated value of $500 per share.
These shares are represented by 4 million depositary shares with a stated value
of $50 per share, each representing one-tenth of a preferred share.

EX-13 38th Page of 116 TOC 1st Previous Next Bottom Just 38th

CAPITAL STRENGTH

[GRAPHIC APPEARS HERE]

J.P. Morgan and its subsidiaries, as well as certain foreign branches of the
principal subsidiary, Morgan Guaranty Trust Company of New York (Morgan
Guaranty), are subject to the capital adequacy rules of several U.S. and foreign
regulators. The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (Federal
Reserve Board), J.P. Morgan's primary regulator, establishes minimum capital
requirements for the consolidated bank holding company as well as for certain of
its subsidiaries, including Morgan Guaranty. Under the capital guidelines
established by the Federal Reserve Board, the published capital ratios of
J.P. Morgan are calculated excluding the equity, assets, and off-balance-sheet
exposures of J.P. Morgan Securities Inc. (JPMSI). JPMSI is subject to the
Uniform Net Capital Rule of the Securities and Exchange Commission. The capital
of J.P. Morgan and its principal subsidiaries exceeded the minimum requirements
set by each regulator at December 31, 1995.

Federal Reserve Board risk-based capital and leverage ratio guidelines

The Federal Reserve Board has risk-based capital guidelines for evaluating the
capital adequacy of banks and bank holding companies. These guidelines require
minimum ratios of risk-based capital to risk adjusted assets of 4% for Tier 1
capital and 8% for total capital. The Federal Reserve Board also has guidelines
for a leverage ratio that is designed to complement the risk-based capital
ratios in determining the overall capital adequacy of banks and bank holding
companies. A minimum leverage ratio of Tier 1 capital to quarterly average total
assets of 3% is required for banks and bank holding companies.

For certain regulatory supervision purposes, bank regulators use five
capital category definitions applicable to banks ranging from "well capitalized"
to "critically undercapitalized." A bank is considered "well capitalized" if it
has minimum Tier 1 capital, total capital, and leverage ratios of 6%, 10%, and
5% respectively. At December 31, 1995 and 1994, Morgan Guaranty's ratios
exceeded the minimum standards for a "well capitalized" bank.

The risk-based capital guidelines require that capital be maintained for
both balance sheet assets and off-balance-sheet exposures in accordance with
their credit risk as defined by the Federal Reserve Board. While the risk-based
capital ratios consider the credit risk associated with these exposures, they do
not currently consider other risks, including liquidity, interest rate, and
other market risks. It is anticipated that the Federal Reserve Board will
require banks to measure and report interest rate risk in 1996, although
resulting in no explicit capital charge, and that market risk will be
incorporated into the risk-based capital framework in 1997.

Capital strength of J.P. Morgan and Morgan Guaranty

J.P. Morgan's capital ratios at December 31 were as follows:

· Download Table

1995 1994 1993
----- ----- ------

Tier 1 capital............ 8.8% 9.6% 9.3%
Total risk-based capital.. 13.0 14.2 13.0
----- ----- ------
Leverage.................. 6.1 6.5 7.3
----- ----- ------

In accordance with Federal Reserve Board guidelines, the risk-based capital
and leverage ratios provided exclude the effect of SFAS No. 115, Accounting
for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities.

At December 31 the risk-based capital and leverage ratios of Morgan Guaranty,
calculated in accordance with the bank regulatory accounting principles, were:

· Download Table

1995 1994 1993
----- ----- ------

Tier 1 capital............. 8.5% 9.7% 8.2%
Total risk-based capital... 11.0 12.6 11.7
----- ----- ------
Leverage................... 5.5 5.5 5.9
----- ----- ------

At December 31, 1995, the Tier 1 and total risk-based capital and leverage
ratios of J.P. Morgan and Morgan Guaranty decreased when compared to December
31, 1994, as an increase in risk adjusted assets more than offset higher
stockholders' equity, principally retained earnings.

EX-13 39th Page of 116 TOC 1st Previous Next Bottom Just 39th

At December 31, 1994, J.P. Morgan's and Morgan Guaranty's Tier 1 and total
capital ratios strengthened as a result of an increase in stockholders' equity,
principally retained earnings, when compared with December 31, 1993. J.P.
Morgan's total capital ratios strengthened primarily from the issuance of long-
term debt qualifying as risk-based capital. J.P. Morgan's and Morgan Guaranty's
Tier 1 and total capital ratios also increased as a result of a Federal Reserve
Board amendment to the risk-based capital guidelines that modified the basis of
recognition of bilateral netting agreements related to interest rate and foreign
exchange derivative contracts. The firm adopted FIN No. 39, effective January 1,
1994, resulting in a decline in J.P. Morgan's and Morgan Guaranty's leverage
ratios; implementation did not affect the risk-based capital ratios.

Risk-based capital

The following table presents the components of J.P. Morgan's risk-based capital
at December 31.

· Enlarge/Download Table

In millions 1995 1994 1993
----------- ------- ------- -------

Common stockholders' equity....................................... $ 9 393 $ 8 620 $ 8 203
Adjustable rate cumulative preferred stock........................ 244 244 244
Less: investments in certain subsidiaries and goodwill (a)........ 604 599 674
------- ------- -------
Tier 1 capital.................................................... 9 033 8 265 7 773
------- ------- -------
Variable cumulative preferred stock............................... 248 248 248
Long-term debt qualifying as risk-based capital................... 3 590 3 227 2 459
Qualifying allowance for credit losses............................ 1 130 1 079 1 043
Less: investments in certain subsidiaries (a)..................... 603 598 673
------- ------- -------
Tier 2 capital.................................................... 4 365 3 956 3 077
------- ------- -------
Total risk-based capital.......................................... 13 398 12 221 10 850
------- ------- -------

(a) One half of our investment in certain subsidiaries (principally JPMSI)
is deducted from both Tier 1 and Tier 2 capital.

Risk adjusted assets

J.P. Morgan's risk adjusted assets at December 31, excluding the assets and off-
balance-sheet exposures of JPMSI, are set forth in the following table.
Additional information is provided in the Risk adjusted assets section of
Capital and funding analysis.

· Enlarge/Download Table

1995 1994 1993
------------------- -------------------- -------------------
Balance Balance Balance
sheet/ Risk sheet/ Risk sheet/ Risk
notional adjusted notional adjusted notional adjusted
In billions amount balance amount balance amount balance
----------- -------- -------- -------- -------- --------- --------

Assets........................ $ 147.6 $54.3 $ 129.1 $47.4 $ 107.8 $46.6
Off-balance-sheet exposures... 3 492.5 48.8 2 489.1 38.9 1 679.8 36.8
-------- -------- -------- -------- --------- --------
Gross risk adjusted assets.... 103.1 86.3 83.4
Less: allowance for credit
losses not qualifying as
risk-based capital....... - (0.1) (0.1)
-------- -------- -------- -------- --------- --------
Risk adjusted assets......... 103.1 86.2 83.3
-------- --------

EX-13 40th Page of 116 TOC 1st Previous Next Bottom Just 40th

RESPONSIBILITY FOR FINANCIAL REPORTING

The financial statements and related financial information in this annual
report were prepared by the management of J.P. Morgan. In doing so, management
applied generally accepted accounting principles and also exercised its judgment
and made estimates in those instances where they were deemed appropriate.

In discharging its responsibility both for the integrity and fairness of
these statements and information, and for the examination of the accounting
systems from which they are derived, management maintains a system of internal
control designed to provide reasonable assurance, weighing the costs
with the benefits sought, that transactions are executed in accordance with
management's authorization, assets are safeguarded, and proper records are
maintained. An important element in management's effort to establish a reliable
control environment is the careful selection, training, and development
of professional personnel, including internal auditors. Management believes that
the system of internal control, which is subject to close scrutiny by management
and by internal auditors and is revised as considered necessary, supports the
integrity and reliability of the financial statements.

Further, the independent accountants perform a study and evaluation of the
system of internal accounting control for the purpose of expressing an opinion
on the financial statements of J.P. Morgan.

The Board of Directors of J.P. Morgan appoints an Audit Committee
responsible for monitoring the accounting practices and internal controls of the
company. The Committee, whose membership consists of directors who are not
officers or employees of J.P. Morgan, meets periodically with members of the
internal auditing staff to discuss the nature and scope of their work and to
review such reports and other matters as the Committee deems necessary. The
Audit Committee also recommends to the Board of Directors the engagement of an
independent accounting firm and meets with representatives of that firm to
discuss the examination of the financial statements as well as other auditing
and financial reporting matters. Both the internal auditors and the independent
accountants are given access to the Audit Committee at any time to discuss
privately matters they believe may be of significance.

In addition, J.P. Morgan is examined periodically by examiners from the
Federal Reserve System and other regulatory agencies. The Board of Directors and
management consider reports that arise from such examinations.

Douglas A. Warner III John A. Mayer Jr.
Chairman of the Board Chief Financial Officer

EX-13 41st Page of 116 TOC 1st Previous Next Bottom Just 41st

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

To the Directors and Stockholders of J.P. Morgan & Co. Incorporated

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of J.P. Morgan & Co.
Incorporated and its subsidiaries ("J.P. Morgan") as of December 31, 1995 and
1994, the related consolidated statements of income, changes in stockholders'
equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December
31, 1995, and the consolidated statement of condition of Morgan Guaranty Trust
Company of New York and its subsidiaries as of December 31, 1995 and 1994. These
financial statements are the responsibility of J.P. Morgan's management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on
our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements audited by us present
fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of J.P. Morgan at
December 31, 1995 and 1994, the results of their operations and cash flows for
each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 1995, and the financial
position of Morgan Guaranty Trust Company of New York and its subsidiaries at
December 31, 1995 and 1994, in conformity with generally accepted accounting
principles.

As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, J.P.
Morgan changed its method of accounting for postretirement benefits and
investments in debt and marketable equity securities in 1993.

Price Waterhouse LLP
1177 Avenue of the Americas
New York, New York 10036

January 10, 1996

EX-13 42nd Page of 116 TOC 1st Previous Next Bottom Just 42nd

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME
J.P. Morgan & Co. Incorporated

· Enlarge/Download Table

In millions, except per share data 1995 1994 1993
------ ------ ------

NET INTEREST REVENUE
Interest revenue............................................... $9 937 $8 379 $7 442
Interest expense............................................... 7 934 6 398 5 670
------ ------ ------
Net interest revenue........................................... 2 003 1 981 1 772

NONINTEREST REVENUE
Trading revenue................................................ 1 376 1 019 2 059
Investment banking revenue..................................... 584 434 532
Credit-related fees............................................ 162 204 224
Investment management fees..................................... 574 517 464
Operational service fees....................................... 546 546 491
Net investment securities gains................................ 21 122 323
Other revenue.................................................. 638 694 406
------ ------ ------
Total noninterest revenue...................................... 3 901 3 536 4 499

OPERATING EXPENSES
Employee compensation and benefits............................. 2 498 2 217 2 221
Net occupancy.................................................. 322 275 391
Technology and communications.................................. 671 645 512
Other expenses................................................. 507 555 456
------ ------ ------
Total operating expenses....................................... 3 998 3 692 3 580
Income before income taxes and
cumulative effect of accounting change.................... 1 906 1 825 2 691
Income taxes................................................... 610 610 968
------ ------ ------
Income before cumulative effect of
accounting change......................................... 1 296 1 215 1 723
Cumulative effect of change in method of accounting
for postretirement benefits, net of related income taxes.. - - (137)
------ ------ ------
NET INCOME..................................................... 1 296 1 215 1 586
------ ------ ------

PER COMMON SHARE (a)
Income before cumulative effect of accounting change........... $6.42 $6.02 $ 8.48
Cumulative effect of change in method of accounting
for postretirement benefits, net of related income taxes.. - - (0.68)
Net income..................................................... 6.42 6.02 7.80
Dividends declared............................................. 3.06 2.79 2.48
------ ------ ------

(a) Earnings per share amounts for 1995 represent primary earnings per
share. For 1995 fully diluted earnings per share were $6.36. Earnings per share
amounts for 1994 and 1993 represent both primary and fully diluted earnings per
share.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

EX-13 43rd Page of 116 TOC 1st Previous Next Bottom Just 43rd

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
J.P. Morgan & Co. Incorporated

· Enlarge/Download Table

December 31
------------------
Dollars in millions 1995 1994
-------- --------

ASSETS
Cash and due from banks..................................................................... $ 1 535 $ 2 210
Interest-earning deposits with banks........................................................ 1 986 1 362
Debt investment securities available for sale carried at fair value (Cost: $24 154 at 1995
and $22 503 at 1994)................................................................... 24 638 22 657
Trading account assets...................................................................... 69 408 57 065
Securities purchased under agreements to resell ($32 157 at 1995
and $21 170 at 1994) and federal funds sold............................................ 32 157 21 350
Securities borrowed......................................................................... 19 830 12 127
Loans....................................................................................... 23 453 22 080
Less: allowance for credit losses........................................................... 1 130 1 131
-------- --------
Net loans................................................................................... 22 323 20 949
Customers' acceptance liability............................................................. 237 586
Accrued interest and accounts receivable.................................................... 3 539 5 028
Premises and equipment, net................................................................. 1 927 2 016
Other assets................................................................................ 7 299 9 567
-------- --------
Total assets................................................................................ 184 879 154 917
-------- --------
LIABILITIES
Noninterest-bearing deposits:
In offices in the U.S.................................................................. 3 287 3 693
In offices outside the U.S............................................................. 744 767

Interest-bearing deposits:
In offices in the U.S.................................................................. 2 003 1 826
In offices outside the U.S............................................................. 40 404 36 799
-------- --------
Total deposits.............................................................................. 46 438 43 085
Trading account liabilities................................................................. 45 289 36 407
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase ($40 803 at 1995 and
$30 179 at 1994) and federal funds purchased........................................... 45 099 35 768
Commercial paper............................................................................ 2 801 3 507
Other liabilities for borrowed money........................................................ 15 129 10 900
Accounts payable and accrued expenses....................................................... 5 643 6 231
Liability on acceptances.................................................................... 237 586
Long-term debt not qualifying as risk-based capital......................................... 5 737 3 605
Other liabilities........................................................................... 4 465 2 063
-------- --------
170 838 142 152
Long-term debt qualifying as risk-based capital............................................. 3 590 3 197
-------- --------
Total liabilities........................................................................... 174 428 145 349
Commitments and contingencies (Notes 9, 17, 18, 19, and 21)

STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Preferred stock............................................................................. 494 494
Common stock, $2.50 par value (authorized shares: 500 000 000;
issued: 200 678 373 at 1995 and 200 668 373 at 1994)................................... 502 502
Capital surplus............................................................................. 1 430 1 452
Retained earnings........................................................................... 7 731 7 044
Net unrealized gains on investment securities, net of taxes................................. 566 456
Other....................................................................................... 552 367
-------- --------
11 275 10 315
Less: treasury stock (13 562 755 shares at 1995 and 12 966 917 shares at 1994) at cost...... 824 747
-------- --------
Total stockholders' equity.................................................................. 10 451 9 568
-------- --------
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity.................................................. 184 879 154 917
-------- --------

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

EX-13 44th Page of 116 TOC 1st Previous Next Bottom Just 44th

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
J.P. Morgan & Co. Incorporated

· Enlarge/Download Table

In millions 1995 1994 1993
------- ------ ------

PREFERRED STOCK
Adjustable rate cumulative preferred stock balance, January 1 and December 31... $ 244 $ 244 $ 244
------- ------ ------
Variable cumulative preferred stock balance, January 1 and December 31.......... 250 250 250
------- ------ ------
Total preferred stock, December 31.............................................. 494 494 494
------- ------ ------
COMMON STOCK
Balance, January 1.............................................................. 502 499 492
Shares issued under dividend reinvestment plan, various employee
benefit plans, and conversion of debentures................................ - 3 7
------- ------ ------
Balance, December 31............................................................ 502 502 499
------- ------ ------
CAPITAL SURPLUS
Balance, January 1.............................................................. 1 452 1 393 1 234
Shares issued or distributed under dividend reinvestment plan,
various employee benefit plans, and conversion of debentures,
and income tax benefits associated with stock options...................... (22) 59 159
------- ------ ------
Balance, December 31............................................................ 1 430 1 452 1 393
------- ------ ------
RETAINED EARNINGS
Balance, January 1.............................................................. 7 044 6 386 5 302
Income before cumulative effect of accounting change............................ 1 296 1 215 1 723
Cumulative effect of change in method of accounting
for postretirement benefits, net of related income taxes................... - - (137)
Dividends declared on adjustable rate cumulative preferred stock................ (12) (12) (12)
Dividends declared on variable cumulative preferred stock....................... (12) (8) (6)
Dividends declared on common stock.............................................. (574) (530) (479)
Dividend equivalents on common stock issuable................................... (11) (7) (5)
------- ------ ------
Balance, December 31............................................................ 7 731 7 044 6 386
------- ------ ------
NET UNREALIZED GAINS ON INVESTMENT SECURITIES, NET OF TAXES
Balance, January 1.............................................................. 456 1 165 -
Cumulative unrealized gains, net of taxes, at December 31, 1993................. - - 1 165
Net change in unrealized gains, net of taxes.................................... 110 (709) -
------- ------ ------
Balance, December 31............................................................ 566 456 1 165
------- ------ ------
OTHER

COMMON STOCK ISSUABLE UNDER STOCK AWARD PLANS
Balance, January 1.............................................................. 369 253 -
Cumulative deferred stock award balance, January 1, 1993........................ - - 165
Deferred stock awards, net...................................................... 187 116 88
------- ------ ------
Balance, December 31............................................................ 556 369 253
------- ------ ------
FOREIGN CURRENCY TRANSLATION
Balance, January 1.............................................................. (2) (3) 1
Translation adjustments......................................................... (3) 2 (5)
Income tax benefit (expense).................................................... 1 (1) 1
------- ------ ------
Balance, December 31............................................................ (4) (2) (3)
------- ------ ------
Total other, December 31........................................................ 552 367 250
------- ------ ------
LESS: TREASURY STOCK
Balance, January 1.............................................................. 747 328 215
Purchases....................................................................... 293 444 132
Shares distributed under various employee benefit plans......................... (216) (25) (19)
------- ------ ------
Balance, December 31............................................................ 824 747 328
------- ------ ------
Total stockholders' equity, December 31......................................... 10 451 9 568 9 859
------- ------ ------

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

EX-13 45th Page of 116 TOC 1st Previous Next Bottom Just 45th

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
J.P. Morgan & Co. Incorporated

· Enlarge/Download Table

In millions 1995 1994 1993
-------- -------- --------

NET INCOME.................................................................... $ 1 296 $ 1 215 $ 1 586
Adjustments to reconcile to cash provided by (used in) operating activities:
Cumulative effect of change in method of accounting for postretirement
benefits, net of related income taxes.................................... - - 137
Noncash items: depreciation, amortization, deferred income taxes,
and stock award plans.................................................... 565 371 258
(Increase) decrease in assets:
Trading account assets................................................... (12 271) (15 772) (15 083)
Securities purchased under agreements to resell.......................... (10 974) 1 461 (12 650)
Securities borrowed...................................................... (7 703) (1 309) (3 742)
Accrued interest and accounts receivable................................. 1 489 (92) (2 240)
Increase (decrease) in liabilities:
Trading account liabilities.............................................. 8 937 18 151 5 124
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase........................... 10 637 (6 140) 12 705
Accounts payable and accrued expenses.................................... (788) 342 2 768
Other changes in operating assets and liabilities, net................... 6 655 (1 881) (88)
Net investment securities gains included in cash flows from
investing activities..................................................... (21) (122) (323)
-------- -------- --------
CASH (USED IN) OPERATING ACTIVITIES........................................... (2 178) (3 776) (11 548)
-------- -------- --------
(Increase) decrease in interest-earning deposits with banks................... (622) (142) 299
Debt investment securities:
Proceeds from sales...................................................... 42 262 51 091 61 900
Proceeds from maturities, calls, and mandatory redemptions............... 3 916 3 705 4 605
Purchases................................................................ (46 419) (59 062) (64 180)
(Increase) decrease in federal funds sold..................................... 180 (119) 36
(Increase) decrease in loans.................................................. (1 375) 2 209 2 027
Payments for premises and equipment........................................... (237) (341) (179)
Other changes, net............................................................ (1 549) (1 099) (432)
-------- -------- --------
CASH PROVIDED BY (USED IN) INVESTING ACTIVITIES............................... (3 844) (3 758) 4 076
-------- -------- --------
Increase (decrease) in noninterest-bearing deposits........................... (428) (1 061) 1 540
Increase in interest-bearing deposits......................................... 3 820 3 703 6 446
Increase (decrease) in federal funds purchased................................ (1 293) 2 483 349
Increase (decrease) in commercial paper....................................... (706) 934 96
Other liabilities for borrowed money proceeds................................. 23 864 7 946 8 482
Other liabilities for borrowed money payments................................. (18 240) (8 128) (12 021)
Long-term debt proceeds....................................................... 3 808 2 342 1 208
Long-term debt payments....................................................... (1 399) (879) (1 356)
Capital stock issued or distributed........................................... 143 61 166
Capital stock purchased....................................................... (293) (445) (132)
Dividends paid................................................................ (583) (541) (480)
Other changes, net............................................................ (3 351) 2 297 3 081
-------- -------- --------
CASH PROVIDED BY FINANCING ACTIVITIES......................................... 5 342 8 712 7 379
-------- -------- --------
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and due from banks.................... 5 24 (48)
-------- -------- --------
INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND DUE FROM BANKS................................ (675) 1 202 (141)
Cash and due from banks, beginning of year.................................... 2 210 1 008 1 149
-------- -------- --------
Cash and due from banks, end of year.......................................... 1 535 2 210 1 008
-------- -------- --------
Cash disbursements made for:
Interest................................................................. $ 7 568 $ 6 178 $ 5 714
Income taxes............................................................. 560 1 223 566
-------- -------- --------

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

EX-13 46th Page of 116 TOC 1st Previous Next Bottom Just 46th

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CONDITION
Morgan Guaranty Trust Company of New York

· Enlarge/Download Table

December 31
-------------------
Dollars in millions 1995 1994
-------- --------

ASSETS
Cash and due from banks......................................................... $ 1 421 $ 2 182
Interest-earning deposits with banks............................................ 2 081 1 605
Debt investment securities available for sale carried at fair value............. 23 625 21 292
Trading account assets.......................................................... 55 298 45 386
Securities purchased under agreements to resell and federal funds sold.......... 21 013 16 562
Loans........................................................................... 20 628 19 397
Less: allowance for credit losses............................................... 1 021 1 025
-------- --------
Net loans....................................................................... 19 607 18 372
Customers' acceptance liability................................................. 237 556
Accrued interest and accounts receivable........................................ 3 401 3 594
Premises and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation of
$1 224 in 1995 and $1 149 in 1994.......................................... 1 734 1 818
Other assets.................................................................... 4 574 7 360
-------- --------
Total assets.................................................................... 132 991 118 727
-------- --------
LIABILITIES
Noninterest-bearing deposits:
In offices in the U.S...................................................... 3 254 3 698
In offices outside the U.S................................................. 839 770
Interest-bearing deposits:
In offices in the U.S...................................................... 1 846 1 480
In offices outside the U.S................................................. 40 450 38 566
-------- --------
Total deposits.................................................................. 46 389 44 514
Trading account liabilities..................................................... 39 126 30 730
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase and federal funds purchased...... 20 090 22 099
Other liabilities for borrowed money............................................ 7 368 5 320
Accounts payable and accrued expenses........................................... 4 168 2 902
Liability on acceptances........................................................ 237 556
Long-term debt not qualifying as risk-based capital (includes $418 in 1995 and
$630 in 1994 of notes payable to J.P. Morgan).............................. 2 786 1 968
Other liabilities............................................................... 2 852 2 080
-------- --------
123 016 110 169
Long-term debt qualifying as risk-based capital (includes $1 310 in 1995 and
$1 030 in 1994 of notes payable to J.P. Morgan)............................ 1 509 1 249
-------- --------
Total liabilities............................................................... 124 525 111 418
Commitments and contingencies

STOCKHOLDER'S EQUITY
Preferred stock, $100 par value (authorized shares: 2 500 000).................. - -
Common stock, $25 par value (authorized and outstanding shares: 10 000 000)..... 250 250
Surplus......................................................................... 2 820 2 670
Undivided profits............................................................... 5 136 4 266
Net unrealized gains on investment securities, net of taxes..................... 264 124
Foreign currency translation.................................................... (4) (1)
-------- --------
Total stockholder's equity...................................................... 8 466 7 309
-------- --------
Total liabilities and stockholder's equity...................................... 132 991 118 727
-------- --------

Member of the Federal Reserve System and Federal Deposit Insurance
Corporation
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this financial statement.

EX-13 47th Page of 116 TOC 1st Previous Next Bottom Just 47th

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1. ACCOUNTING POLICIES

J.P. Morgan, a global financial services firm, is the holding company for
subsidiaries engaged in providing a wide range of financial services including
advisory, financing, trading, investment, and related capabilities. J.P. Morgan
provides these capabilities to a broad global client base including
corporations, governments, institutions, and individuals. The accounting and
reporting policies and practices of J.P. Morgan and subsidiaries, including
Morgan Guaranty Trust Company of New York and subsidiaries (Morgan Guaranty),
conform with generally accepted accounting principles. The following is a
description of significant accounting policies and practices.

Consolidation

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of J.P. Morgan and
subsidiaries (companies in which its percentage of ownership exceeds 50%). All
material intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in
consolidation. The equity method of accounting is used in determining the
carrying values of investments in companies in which the percentage of
investment in voting stock is 20% or more but not more than 50%. These
investments are included in Other assets.

Debt and equity investment securities

Debt investment securities:
Debt investment securities are held to maximize total return over the longer
term. Beginning December 31, 1993, investment securities that may be sold in
response to or in anticipation of changes in interest rates and prepayment risk,
liquidity considerations, and other factors are considered available-for-sale.
Such securities are carried at fair value with unrealized gains and losses,
including the effect of hedges, reported as a net amount within the
stockholders' equity account, Net unrealized gains on investment securities, net
of taxes, until realized.

Realized gains and losses on debt investment securities, which are
generally computed by the specific identification method, and other-than-
temporary impairments in value are included in Net investment securities gains.
Debt investment securities transactions are recorded on their trade dates.
Carrying values of individual debt investment securities are reduced through
write-downs to reflect other-than-temporary impairments in value.

In instances where J.P. Morgan has the positive intent and ability to hold
to maturity, investment securities will be carried at cost, adjusted for
amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts.

Prior to December 31, 1993, debt investment securities were carried at the
lower of aggregate amortized cost or market value (LOCOM) with aggregate
unrealized net valuation adjustments, if any, included in Net investment
securities gains.

Equity investment securities:

Equity investment securities of companies in which the percentage of investment
in voting stock is less than 20% are held for long-term appreciation and are
included in Other assets. Beginning December 31, 1993, equity investment
securities with available market quotations are carried at fair value with
unrealized gains and losses reported as a net amount within the stockholders'
equity account, Net unrealized gains on investment securities, net of taxes,
until realized. Prior to December 31, 1993, marketable equity investment
securities were carried at the lower of aggregate cost or market value. Equity
investment securities without available market quotations are carried at cost.
Carrying values of individual marketable and nonmarketable equity investment
securities are reduced through write-downs to reflect other-than-temporary
impairments in value. Realized gains and losses, which are generally computed by
the specific identification method, and other-than-temporary impairments in
value are included in Other revenue.

EX-13 48th Page of 116 TOC 1st Previous Next Bottom Just 48th

Trading account assets and liabilities

Trading account assets and liabilities (short trading positions) are carried at
market value and are recorded as of their trade dates. Short trading positions
are classified as liabilities. Gains and losses on trading positions are
recognized currently.

Securities financing arrangements

Securities purchased under agreements to resell (resale agreements) and
securities sold under agreements to repurchase (repurchase agreements) are
generally treated as collateralized lending and borrowing transactions and are
carried at the amounts at which the securities were initially acquired or sold.
Securities borrowed that are collateralized by cash are included on the balance
sheet at amounts equal to the collateral advanced.

J.P. Morgan takes possession of securities purchased under resale
agreements, primarily U.S. Treasury and U.S. government agency securities. J.P.
Morgan monitors the market value of these securities and obtains additional
collateral when appropriate to secure the seller's repurchase obligations.

Premiums and discounts

Amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts are generally recognized as
interest expense or interest revenue over the life of the instrument.

Impaired loans

J.P. Morgan defines an impaired loan as any loan on which the accrual of
interest is discontinued because the contractual payment of principal or
interest has become 90 days past due or management has serious doubts about
future collectibility of principal or interest, even though the loans are
currently performing (i.e., nonaccrual loans). Factors involved in determining
impairment include, but are not limited to, expected future cash flows,
financial condition of the borrower, and current economic conditions. When a
loan is recognized as impaired, any accrued but unpaid interest previously
recorded on such loan is reversed against interest revenue of the current
period. Interest received on impaired loans is generally either applied against
the principal or reported as revenue, according to management's judgment as to
the collectibility of principal. Generally, a loan may be restored to accrual
status only after all delinquent interest and principal are brought current and,
in the case of loans where interest has been interrupted for a substantial
period, a regular payment performance is established.

J.P. Morgan measures each loan impairment based upon the present value of
expected future cash flows discounted at an individual loan's effective interest
rate, except where there is an observable market value or, if the loan is
collateral dependent, at the fair value of the collateral.

Management recommends those credits or portions of credits judged to be
uncollectible and that should be charged off.

Allowance for credit losses

An allowance is maintained that is considered adequate to absorb losses inherent
in the existing portfolios of loans and other undertakings to extend credit,
such as irrevocable unused loan commitments, or to make payments to others for
which a client is ultimately liable, such as standby letters of credit and
guarantees, commercial letters of credit and acceptances, and all other credit
exposures, including derivatives. A judgment as to the adequacy of the allowance
is made at the end of each quarterly reporting period. Should the allowance
require adjustment either because of reductions due to charge-offs or because of
changes in the size or risk characteristics of the portfolios, the allowance is
adjusted through a provision for credit losses in the quarterly reporting
period.

EX-13 49th Page of 116 TOC 1st Previous Next Bottom Just 49th

Premises and equipment

Premises and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation.
Depreciation is generally computed by the straight-line method over the
estimated useful lives of the related assets.

Derivatives used for trading purposes

Derivatives entered into for trading purposes or used as hedges of trading
instruments are carried at market value. Instruments used for trading purposes
include swaps, futures, forward, spot, and option contracts in the interest
rate, foreign exchange, equity, and commodity markets. Gains and losses
associated with such derivatives are recognized currently in Trading revenue.
The portion of the market value associated with derivatives that reflects credit
considerations, ongoing servicing, and transaction hedging costs is recognized
over the life of the agreement in Trading revenue. Unrealized gains and losses
are reported on a gross basis in Trading account assets or Trading account
liabilities, after taking into consideration the offsetting permitted under
Financial Accounting Standards Board Interpretation No. 39 (FIN No. 39),
Offsetting of Amounts Related to Certain Contracts. The market values of options
purchased and written are recorded on a gross basis in Trading account assets
and Trading account liabilities respectively.

Derivatives used for purposes other than trading

Asset and liability management derivatives are used to hedge exposures, to
modify the interest rate characteristics of related balance sheet instruments,
or to meet longer-term asset and liability management objectives, including
maximization of net interest revenue. The specific criteria required for
derivatives used for such purposes are described below. Derivatives that do not
meet these criteria are carried at market value with changes in value recognized
currently in earnings.

Derivatives used as hedges must be effective at reducing the risk
associated with the exposure being hedged and must be designated as a hedge at
the inception of the derivative contract. Accordingly, changes in the market
value of the derivative must be highly correlated with changes in the market
value of the underlying hedged item at inception of the hedge and over the life
of the hedge contract. Derivatives used for hedging purposes include swaps,
forwards, futures, and purchased options in the interest rate and foreign
exchange markets. Interest rate swaps are also used to modify the interest rate
characteristics of related balance sheet instruments. Swaps used to modify the
interest rate characteristics of nontrading-related balance sheet instruments
must be linked to the related asset or liability, whereby the terms of the swap
generally equal the terms of the related asset or liability, at the inception
and throughout the term of the derivative contract. Unrealized gains and losses
on all of these derivative contracts are generally deferred. Derivatives used as
hedges or to modify the interest rate characteristics of debt investment
securities are carried at fair value with the related unrealized gains and
losses deferred in a separate component of stockholders' equity. Margin
requirements associated with futures contracts and option premiums for contracts
used as hedges are recorded in Other assets or Other liabilities. The interest
component associated with derivatives used as hedges or to modify the interest
rate characteristics of assets and liabilities is recognized over the life of
the contract in Net interest revenue. Upon contract settlement or termination,
the cumulative change in the market value of such derivatives is recorded as an
adjustment to the carrying value of the underlying asset or liability and
recognized in Net interest revenue over the expected remaining life of the
related asset or liability. In instances where the underlying instrument is
sold, the cumulative change in the value of the associated derivative is
recognized immediately in the component of earnings relating to the underlying
instrument.

Risk-adjusting swaps are used in a manner similar to debt investment
securities to achieve a desired overall interest rate profile by increasing or
decreasing the firm's overall exposure to interest rate risk. Risk-adjusting
swaps include only interest rate swaps that replicate the cash flows of
nonamortizing cash instruments and do not contain leverage or embedded option
features. Interest revenue or expense associated with these swaps is accrued
over the life of the swap agreement in Net interest revenue. Risk-adjusting
swaps are carried at the lower of aggregate cost or market value with aggregate
unrealized net valuation adjustments, if any, recorded in Other revenue. Risk-
adjusting swaps are generally not terminated. In instances where a risk-
adjusting swap is terminated, losses are recognized immediately and gains are
deferred and amortized over the original remaining life of the terminated swap
in Other revenue.

EX-13 50th Page of 116 TOC 1st Previous Next Bottom Just 50th

Fee revenue

Investment banking revenue includes fees earned from providing advisory services
and arranging financing for clients. All such fees are recognized as revenue
when the related services are performed. In addition, credit arrangement and
syndication fees are recognized after certain retention, timing, and yield
criteria are satisfied.

Credit-related, investment management, and operational service fees that
represent a return for services rendered are recognized as revenue when the
related service is performed. Commitment fees are recognized as revenue in the
period the unused commitment is available.

Income taxes

Deferred tax assets and liabilities are established for the expected future tax
consequences of temporary differences between the carrying amounts and tax bases
of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates. A valuation allowance is
established to reduce deferred tax assets to the amounts expected to be
realized. Investment tax credits continue to be amortized over the estimated
useful lives of the related assets.

Statement of cash flows

Cash flows from trading account assets and liabilities, trading-related
derivative transactions, resale and repurchase agreements, and securities
borrowed are classified as operating activities. Cash flows from investment
securities, including securities available for sale, are classified as investing
activities. Cash flows from sales of investment securities that had remaining
lives of greater than one year when purchased and less than 90 days when sold,
mandatory redemptions, and calls are classified as proceeds from maturities.
Cash flows from derivative transactions used as hedges are classified consistent
with the items being hedged.

Other

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted
accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of
contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and
the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reported period. Actual
results could differ from those estimates.

Certain prior-year amounts have been reclassified to conform with 1995
classifications.

2. ACCOUNTING CHANGES

Accounting for impairment of a loan

Effective January 1, 1995, J.P. Morgan adopted Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards (SFAS) No. 114 and subsequent amendment SFAS No. 118, both entitled
Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan, which prescribe criteria for
recognition of loan impairment as well as methods to measure impairment of
certain loans, including loans whose terms were modified in troubled debt
restructurings. The standards require that impaired loans be measured based on
the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan's
effective interest rate or, as a practical expedient, at the loan's observable
market price, or at the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral
dependent. The adoption of these standards did not have a material impact on
J.P. Morgan's financial statements and did not affect its charge-off policy.

Accounting for postretirement benefits other than pensions

Effective January 1, 1993, J.P. Morgan adopted SFAS No. 106, Employers'
Accounting for Postretirement Benefits Other Than Pensions, which requires the
recognition of costs related to postretirement benefits on an accrual basis
rather than expensing such costs when paid. Adoption of the accrual method
beginning in 1993 increased Employee compensation and benefits for the year by
$21 million. In adopting this standard, J.P. Morgan recorded the full amount of
the accumulated postretirement benefit obligation as of January 1, 1993,
resulting in a nonoperating charge to earnings of $137 million ($0.68 per share)
after income taxes of $74 million.

EX-13 51st Page of 116 TOC 1st Previous Next Bottom Just 51st

Accounting for certain investments in debt and equity securities

Effective December 31, 1993, J.P. Morgan adopted SFAS No. 115, Accounting for
Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities, which resulted in a change in
the accounting for debt and marketable equity investment securities held for
investment purposes. Those securities, which J.P. Morgan previously carried at
the lower of aggregate cost or market value, are considered available for sale
and carried at fair value. Unrealized gains and losses are excluded from
earnings and reported net of taxes as a separate component of stockholders'
equity until realized. Upon adoption of this standard, J.P. Morgan recorded
increases in Debt investment securities of $859 million and Other assets of
$1,030 million for marketable equity investment securities, and a deferred tax
liability of $724 million related to the appreciation of the affected
securities, resulting in an increase of $1,165 million in stockholders' equity,
net of taxes.

3. DISPOSITION OF GLOBAL AND LOCAL SECURITIES CUSTODY BUSINESSES

In 1995, J.P. Morgan sold its global and local custody businesses and its U.S.
commercial paper issuing and paying agency business and discontinued certain
cash services businesses. Total revenue related to these activities for the year
ended December 31, 1995, was approximately 6% of consolidated total revenues.
The transition of client accounts to the buyers is expected to be completed over
the next 18 to 24 months. The firm is contractually obligated to provide certain
services to these clients for the benefit of the buyer until the transition is
complete.

Gross proceeds of $260 million from the sales were recorded in Other
revenue. The firm recorded $220 million of nonrecurring costs, net against
proceeds, associated with the exit of these businesses. The costs included
severance and other personnel-related costs of $35 million, unreimbursed
transition costs of $35 million, and other costs of approximately $40 million.
In addition, a real estate charge of $110 million was recorded as a result of
the rationalization of the firm's space requirements coincident with the
disposition of these businesses and the corresponding reduction in personnel.
The total number of personnel to be affected by these actions is expected to be
approximately 1,200, with 850 employees removed from the firm's December 31,
1995, headcount.

EX-13 52nd Page of 116 TOC 1st Previous Next Bottom Just 52nd

4. INTEREST REVENUE AND EXPENSE

An analysis of interest revenue and expense derived from on- and off-balance-
sheet financial instruments is presented in the table below. Interest revenue
and expense associated with derivative financial instruments, such as swaps,
forwards, spot, futures, options, and debt securities forwards, used as hedges
or to modify the interest rate characteristics of assets and liabilities, are
attributed to and included with the related balance sheet instrument. Net
interest revenue associated with risk-adjusting swaps that are used to meet
longer-term asset and liability management objectives, including the
maximization of net interest revenue, is not attributed to a specific balance
sheet instrument, but is included in the Other sources caption in the table
below.

· Download Table

In millions 1995 1994 1993
------ ------ ------

INTEREST REVENUE
Deposits with banks............................. $ 168 $ 197 $ 235
Debt investment securities (a).................. 1 552 1 206 1 440
Trading account assets.......................... 3 036 2 784 1 991
Securities purchased under agreements to resell
and federal funds sold..................... 1 942 1 593 1 408
Securities borrowed............................. 876 624 408
Loans........................................... 1 699 1 409 1 652
Other sources, primarily risk-adjusting swaps... 664 566 308
------ ------ ------
Total interest revenue.......................... 9 937 8 379 7 442
------ ------ ------

INTEREST EXPENSE
Deposits........................................ 2 520 1 946 1 917
Trading account liabilities..................... 1 361 1 288 916
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase
and federal funds purchased................ 2 568 2 196 2 055
Other borrowed money............................ 935 679 554
Long-term debt.................................. 550 289 228
------ ------ ------
Total interest expense.......................... 7 934 6 398 5 670
------ ------ ------
Net interest revenue............................ 2 003 1 981 1 772
------ ------ ------

(a) Interest revenue from debt investment securities included taxable
revenue of $1,392 million, $1,035 million, and $1,266 million and revenue exempt
from U.S. income taxes of $160 million, $171 million, and $174 million in 1995,
1994, and 1993 respectively.

For the twelve months ended December 31, 1995 and 1994, net interest revenue
associated with asset and liability management derivatives was approximately
$370 million and $150 million respectively. At December 31, 1995, approximately
($250) million of net deferred losses on closed derivative contracts used for
asset and liability management purposes were recorded on the balance sheet. Such
amount is primarily composed of net deferred losses on closed hedge contracts
included in the amortized cost of the debt investment portfolio. As discussed in
Note 7 to the financial statements, Investment securities, the net unrealized
appreciation associated with the debt investment portfolio was $484 million at
December 31, 1995. Net deferred losses on closed derivative contracts at
December 31, 1995, are expected to amortize into Net interest revenue as
follows: ($140) million in 1996; ($80) million in 1997; ($30) million in 1998;
($4) million in 1999; ($1) million in 2000; and approximately $5 million
thereafter. At December 31, 1994, approximately $420 million of net deferred
gains on closed derivative contracts were recorded on the balance sheet,
primarily composed of net deferred gains on closed hedge contracts included in
the amortized cost of the debt investment portfolio. The amount of net deferred
gains or losses on closed derivative contracts will change from period to
period, primarily due to amortization of such amounts to net interest revenue
and the execution of our asset and liability management strategies, which may
result in the sale of the underlying hedged instruments and/or termination of
hedge contracts.

EX-13 53rd Page of 116 TOC 1st Previous Next Bottom Just 53rd

5. TRADING REVENUE

Trading revenue disaggregated by principal product groupings is presented below.
For additional information refer to the Trading revenue discussion in the
Financial review.

· Download Table

In millions 1995 1994 1993
------ ------ ------

Fixed Income...... $ 668 $ 766 $1 290
Equities.......... 249 115 199
Foreign Exchange.. 253 168 315
Commodities....... 42 82 57
Proprietary Unit.. 164 (112) 198
------ ------ ------
Trading revenue... 1 376 1 019 2 059
------ ------ ------

6. CASH AND DUE FROM BANKS

J.P. Morgan is required to maintain noninterest-earning reserve balances with
U.S. Federal Reserve banks and various foreign central banks. Such balances,
which are based principally on deposits outstanding, are included in Cash and
due from banks. At December 31, 1995 and 1994, required reserves were $385
million and $390 million respectively, compared with average required reserves
during the year of $378 million in 1995 and $426 million in 1994.

EX-13 54th Page of 116 TOC 1st Previous Next Bottom Just 54th

7. INVESTMENT SECURITIES

Debt investment securities

At December 31, 1995 and 1994, the debt investment securities portfolio was
classified as available for sale and measured at fair value with unrealized
gains (losses) excluded from earnings and reported as a net amount within the
stockholders' equity account Net unrealized gains on investment securities, net
of taxes, until realized. Prior to the adoption of this accounting standard, the
debt investment securities portfolio was carried at LOCOM.

Gross unrealized gains and losses as well as a comparison of the cost and
carrying value of debt investment securities available for sale and carried at
fair value at December 31, 1995 and 1994, are presented in the table below. Net
unrealized appreciation associated with debt investment securities at December
31, 1995, was $484 million, consisting of gross unrealized appreciation of $595
million and gross unrealized depreciation of $111 million. Such amounts
represent the gross unrealized appreciation or depreciation on each debt
security, including the effects of any related hedge. For additional detail of
gross unrealized gains and losses associated with open derivative contracts used
to hedge debt investment securities, see Note 10 to the financial statements,
Estimated fair value of financial instruments.

· Download Table

Gross Gross Fair and
unrealized unrealized carrying
In millions Cost gains losses value
------- ---------- ---------- --------

1995
U.S. Treasury $ 1 892 $136 $ 2 $ 2 026
U.S. government agency, principally
mortgage-backed 15 392 200 69 15 523
U.S. state and political subdivision 1 875 214 16 2 073
U.S. corporate and bank debt 188 5 - 193
Foreign government (a) 3 413 33 21 3 425
Foreign corporate and bank debt 1 295 6 3 1 298
Other 99 1 - 100
------- ---- ---- -------

Total debt investment securities 24 154 595 111 24 638
------- ---- ---- -------

Gross Gross Fair and
unrealized unrealized carrying
In millions Cost gains losses value
------- ---------- ---------- --------

1994
U.S. Treasury $ 1 651 $ 14 $ 42 $ 1 623
U.S. government agency, principally
mortgage-backed 13 531 210 88 13 653
U.S. state and political subdivision 2 396 157 58 2 495
U.S. corporate and bank debt 265 17 - 282
Foreign government (a) 3 758 20 65 3 713
Foreign corporate and bank debt 802 7 19 790
Other 100 1 - 101
------- ---- ---- -------

Total debt investment securities 22 503 426 272 22 657
------- ---- ---- -------

(a) Primarily includes debt of countries that are members of the
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.

At December 31, 1995, there were no securities of a single issuer whose fair
value exceeded 10% of stockholders' equity.

As a result of applying LOCOM accounting to our investment securities portfolio
through December 31, 1993, no unrealized losses were recorded, as the aggregate
portfolio had net unrealized appreciation.

EX-13 55th Page of 116 TOC 1st Previous Next Bottom Just 55th

The following table presents the components of Net investment securities
gains realized during 1995, 1994, and 1993. Gains and losses on securities
carried at fair value reflect transactions that occurred subsequent to the
December 31, 1993, change in reporting for this portfolio. Amounts relating to
LOCOM reflect transactions that occurred through December 31, 1993.

· Download Table

In millions 1995 1994 1993
----------- ----- ----- -----

Gross realized gains from sales of securities carried:
At fair value...................................... $ 371 $ 411 -
At LOCOM........................................... - - $ 581
Gross realized losses from sales of securities carried:
At fair value...................................... (363) (307) -
At LOCOM........................................... - - (276)
Net gains on maturities, calls, and mandatory
redemptions of securities carried:
At fair value...................................... 13 18 -
At LOCOM........................................... - - 18
----- ----- -----
Net investment securities gains........................ 21 122 323
----- ----- -----

A profile of the maturities of available-for-sale debt investment securities as
of December 31, 1995, and the related weighted-average rates on such securities
is presented in the following table. Mortgage-backed securities are included
based on their weighted-average lives, reflecting anticipated future
prepayments based on a consensus of dealers in the market.

· Enlarge/Download Table

After one After five After ten
Within year but years but years but After
one within within within twenty
Dollars in millions year five ten twenty years Total
------------------- ---------- ---------- ---------- --------- ------- --------

U.S. Treasury.............................................. $ 105 $ 899 $ 490 $ 126 $ 272 $ 1 892
U.S. government agency,
principally mortgage-backed........................... 416 14 629 347 - - 15 392
U.S. state and political subdivision....................... 285 386 338 462 404 1 875
U.S. corporate and bank debt............................... 58 112 18 - - 188
Foreign government......................................... 751 923 1 725 14 - 3 413
Foreign corporate and bank debt............................ 508 482 248 15 42 1 295
Other...................................................... - - - - 99 99
---------- ---------- ---------- --------- ------- --------
Total debt investment securities,
at cost............................................... 2 123 17 431 3 166 617 817 24 154
Fair value................................................. 2 130 17 600 3 288 717 903 24 638
---------- ---------- ---------- --------- ------- --------
Net unrealized gains....................................... 7 169 122 100 86 484
---------- ---------- ---------- --------- ------- --------
Average rates on debt
investment securities, at cost........................ 5.96% 7.74% 7.29% 10.35% 8.39% 7.61%
---------- ---------- ---------- --------- ------- --------

Average rates represent the weighted average at December 31, 1995, and
include the effects of various hedging transactions. Average rates do not give
effect to unrealized gains and losses that are reflected as a component of
stockholders' equity. U.S. state and political subdivision securities have been
adjusted to a taxable-equivalent basis.

Equity investment securities

Equity investment securities are held for long-term appreciation and are
included in Other assets. These securities, which are acquired primarily through
private placements, recapitalizations, and corporate restructurings and consist
of both marketable and nonmarketable securities, are generally owned by
J.P. Morgan Capital Corporation, a wholly owned nonbank subsidiary of J.P.
Morgan. Quoted or estimated values of equity investment securities do not
necessarily represent net realizable amounts, as the timing or size of
transactions and the liquidity of the markets may not support realization of
these values. Fair values for equity investment securities for which there are
no publicly quoted market prices are determined by management based on financial
and other available information. Most of our equity investment securities are
subject to legal, regulatory, and contractual restrictions that limit our
ability to dispose of them freely.

EX-13 56th Page of 116 TOC 1st Previous Next Bottom Just 56th

At December 31, 1995 and 1994, marketable equity investment securities were
classified as available for sale and carried at fair value. Net unrealized
appreciation of $440 million and $576 million associated with these available-
for-sale equity investment securities at December 31, 1995 and 1994,
respectively, primarily related to investments in health-care and insurance-
industry-related securities, is included within the stockholders' equity
account Net unrealized gains on investment securities, net of taxes. Net
realized gains on equity investment securities during 1995 of $485 million are
reflected in Other revenue. This amount represents $518 million of gross
realized gains and $33 million of write-downs of equity investment securities.
In 1994 and 1993 net realized gains from equity investment securities were $606
million and $246 million after write-downs of $19 million and $27 million
respectively. Gross unrealized gains and losses as well as a comparison of the
cost, fair value, and carrying value of marketable equity investment securities
at December 31, 1995 and 1994, follows.

· Download Table

In millions: December 31 1995 1994
------------------------ ----- -----

Cost....................................... $ 237 $ 183
Gross unrealized gains..................... 441 579
Gross unrealized losses.................... (1) (3)
----- -----
Fair and carrying value.................... 677 759

Nonmarketable equity investment securities are outside the scope of SFAS No. 115
and continue to be carried at cost of $424 million at December 31, 1995,
compared with $432 million at December 31, 1994. The estimated fair value of
securities without available market quotations was $509 million and $528 million
at December 31, 1995 and 1994, respectively. Net unrealized appreciation at
December 31, 1995 and 1994, for securities without market quotations was
primarily related to one communications-industry investment.

8. TRADING ACCOUNT ASSETS AND LIABILITIES

Trading account assets and liabilities, including derivative instruments used
for trading purposes, are carried at fair value. The following table presents
the carrying value of trading account assets and liabilities at December 31,
1995 and 1994, and the average balance for the years then ended.

· Download Table

1995 1994
------------------ -----------------
Carrying Average Carrying Average
In millions value balance value balance
----------- -------------------------------------

TRADING ACCOUNT ASSETS
U.S. Treasury....................... $ 8 396 $ 6 900 $ 6 668 $ 7 675
U.S. government agency.............. 2 549 2 410 3 332 4 579
Foreign government.................. 20 111 20 139 17 073 17 569
Corporate debt and equity........... 12 406 10 008 7 409 7 915
Other securities.................... 3 147 4 834 3 088 2 885
Interest rate and currency swaps.... 12 444 13 032 10 914 11 036
Foreign exchange contracts.......... 3 286 4 920 3 573 5 032
Interest rate futures and forwards.. 444 309 152 151
Commodity and equity contracts...... 1 377 1 372 1 146 1 219
Purchased option contracts.......... 5 248 4 095 3 710 3 959
--------- -------- -------- --------
69 408 68 019 57 065 62 020
--------- -------- -------- --------

TRADING ACCOUNT LIABILITIES
U.S. Treasury....................... 9 282 7 070 7 187 9 015
Foreign government.................. 8 953 10 334 8 481 8 640
Corporate debt and equity........... 2 847 3 384 2 519 2 445
Other securities.................... 668 1 552 1 165 888
Interest rate and currency swaps.... 11 208 12 016 8 283 8 455
Foreign exchange contracts.......... 4 126 4 501 2 605 4 178
Interest rate futures and forwards.. 549 373 182 132
Commodity and equity contracts...... 2 595 1 633 1 300 815
Written option contracts............ 5 061 4 320 4 685 3 984
--------- -------- -------- --------
45 289 45 183 36 407 38 552
--------- -------- -------- --------

EX-13 57th Page of 116 TOC 1st Previous Next Bottom Just 57th

9. OFF-BALANCE-SHEET FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

Derivatives

Derivatives may be used either for trading or asset and liability management
purposes. Accordingly, the notional amounts presented in the table below have
been identified as relating to either trading or asset and liability management
activities based on management's intent and ongoing usage. A summary of the
credit exposure, which is represented by the positive market value associated
with derivatives, after considering the benefit of approximately $27.7 billion
and $12.7 billion of master netting agreements in effect at December 31, 1995
and 1994, respectively is also presented.

· Enlarge/Download Table

Notional amounts Credit exposure
----------------- ---------------
In billions: December 31 1995 1994 1995 1994
------------------------ -------- ------- ------ --------

Interest rate and currency swaps
Trading.................................................. $1 233.3 $723.5
Asset and liability management (a) (b) (c)............... 282.3 251.4
-------- -------
Total interest rate and currency swaps................... 1 515.6 974.9 $ 12.4 $10.9
-------- ------- ------ ------
Foreign exchange spot, forward, and futures contracts
Trading.................................................. 443.7 382.8
Asset and liability management (a) (b)................... 18.1 14.9
-------- ------- ------ ------
Total foreign exchange spot, forward,
and futures contracts................................... 461.8 397.7 3.3 3.6
-------- ------- ------ ------
Interest rate futures, forward rate agreements,
and debt securities forwards
Trading.................................................. 412.7 404.5
Asset and liability management........................... 2.7 22.0
-------- ------- ------ ------
Total interest rate futures, forward rate
agreements, and debt securities forwards................. 415.4 426.5 0.5 0.2
-------- ------- ------ ------
Commodity and equity swaps, forward,
and futures contracts, all trading....................... 65.1 43.9 1.4 1.1
-------- ------- ------ ------
Purchased options (d)
Trading.................................................. 462.2 276.7
Asset and liability management (a)....................... 2.6 3.9
-------- ------- ------ ------

Total purchased options.................................. 464.8 280.6 5.2 3.7
-------- ------- ------ ------
Written options, all trading (e) (f).......................... 524.0 348.9 - -
-------- ------- ------ ------
Total credit exposure recorded as assets
on the balance sheet..................................... 22.8 19.5
-------- ------- ------ ------

(a) The majority of J.P. Morgan's asset and liability management derivatives are
transacted with independently managed J.P. Morgan derivatives dealers that
function as intermediaries for credit and administrative purposes.
(b) At December 31, 1995 and 1994, the notional amounts of asset and liability
management derivatives contracts conducted in the foreign exchange markets,
primarily forward contracts, amounted to $20.8 billion and $16.9 billion
respectively. At December 31, 1995, these contracts were primarily
denominated in the following currencies: deutsche mark $4.6 billion, Italian
lira $2.5 billion, Japanese yen $2.3 billion, French franc $1.8 billion,
British pound $1.7 billion, Spanish peseta $1.7 billion, Belgian franc $1.5
billion, and Swiss franc $1.5 billion. At December 31, 1994, these contracts
were primarily denominated in the following currencies: deutsche mark $3.8
billion, Belgian franc $2.3 billion, Italian lira $2.2 billion, Canadian
dollar $1.5 billion, British pound $1.3 billion, French franc $1.2 billion,
and Swiss franc $1.0 billion.
(c) The notional amounts of risk-adjusting swaps were $259.4 billion and $233.0
billion at December 31, 1995 and 1994, respectively.
(d) At December 31, 1995 and 1994, purchased options used for trading purposes
included $356.7 billion and $206.6 billion respectively of interest rate
options, $72.5 billion and $45.7 billion respectively of foreign exchange
options, and $33.0 billion and $24.4 billion respectively of commodity and
equity options. Only interest rate options are used for asset and liability
management purposes. Purchased options executed on an exchange amounted to
$137.4 billion and those negotiated over the counter amounted to $327.4
billion at December 31, 1995.
(e) At December 31, 1995 and 1994, written options included $414.6 billion and
$271.2 billion respectively of interest rate options, $72.8 billion and
$51.5 billion respectively of foreign exchange options, and $36.6 billion
and $26.2 billion respectively of commodity and equity options. Written
options executed on an exchange amounted to $162.4 billion and those
negotiated over the counter amounted to $361.6 billion at December 31, 1995.
(f) The total notional amount of written put options includes $6.7 billion and
$3.9 billion of written put option contracts on debt securities at December
31, 1995 and 1994, respectively.

EX-13 58th Page of 116 TOC 1st Previous Next Bottom Just 58th

The following presents the credit exposure associated with derivatives at
December 31, 1995 and 1994, segregated by type of counterparty.

· Download Table

Nonbank
financial Govern-
In billions: December 31 institutions ments Banks All other Total
------------------------ ------------ ------- ----- --------- -----

1995
Credit exposure.......... $5.8 $2.8 $8.9 $5.3 $22.8

1994
Credit exposure.......... 2.5 2.9 8.9 5.2 19.5

Credit-related financial instruments

Credit-related financial instruments include commitments to extend credit,
standby letters of credit and guarantees, and indemnifications in connection
with securities lending activities. The contractual amounts of these instruments
represent the amounts at risk should the contract be fully drawn upon, the
client default, and the value of any existing collateral become worthless. The
total contractual amount of credit-related financial instruments does not
represent the expected future liquidity requirements, since a significant
amount of commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit and
guarantees are expected to expire or mature without being drawn. The credit
risk associated with these instruments varies depending on the creditworthiness
of the client and the value of any collateral held. Commitments to extend credit
generally require the client to meet certain credit-related terms and conditions
before drawdown. Collateral is required in connection with securities lending
indemnifications. Market risk for commitments to extend credit and standby
letters of credit and guarantees, while not significant, may exist as
availability of and access to credit markets change.

A summary of the contractual amount of credit-related instruments at
December 31 is presented in the following table.

· Download Table

In billions 1995 1994
----------- ----- -----

Commitments to extend credit................... $55.1 $44.6
Standby letters of credit and guarantees....... 11.7 9.9
Securities lending indemnifications (a)........ 1.0 19.5

(a) At December 31, 1995 and 1994, J.P. Morgan held cash and other collateral of
$1.1 billion and $19.4 billion respectively in support of securities lending
indemnifications.

The following presents the contractual amount of commitments to extend credit
and standby letters of credit and guarantees at December 31, 1995 and 1994,
segregated by type of counterparty.

· Download Table

Nonbank
financial Govern-
In billions: December 31 institutions ments Banks All other Total
------------------------ ------------ ------- ----- --------- ------

1995
Commitments to extend credit.. $ 9.4 $3.7 $4.4 $37.6(a) $55.1
Standby letters of credit and
guarantees............... 3.8 2.0 0.5 5.4(b) 11.7
------------ ------- ----- --------- ------
1994
Commitments to extend credit.. 10.0 2.1 3.8 28.7(a) 44.6
Standby letters of credit and
guarantees............... 3.1 0.8 0.3 5.7(b) 9.9
------------ ------- ----- --------- ------

(a) At December 31, 1995 and 1994, the utilities industry exceeded 10% of this
amount.
(b) The utilities and health-care industries at December 31, 1995, and the
telecommunications, utilities, and health-care industries at December 31,
1994, each exceeded 10% of this amount.

EX-13 59th Page of 116 TOC 1st Previous Next Bottom Just 59th

Other

Consistent with industry practice, amounts receivable and payable for securities
that have not reached the contractual settlement dates are recorded net on the
consolidated balance sheet. Amounts payable for securities purchased of $31.6
billion and $26.1 billion were netted against amounts receivable for securities
sold of $27.5 billion and $29.4 billion to arrive at a net trade date payable of
$4.1 billion and net trade date receivable of $3.3 billion at December 31, 1995
and 1994, respectively.

10. ESTIMATED FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

In accordance with SFAS No. 107, Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial
Instruments, J.P. Morgan estimates that the aggregate net fair value of all
balance sheet and off-balance-sheet financial instruments exceeded associated
net carrying values at December 31, 1995 and 1994, by $1.4 billion and $2.2
billion respectively before considering income taxes. Net unrealized
appreciation declined in 1995, primarily due to a decrease in net unrealized
appreciation associated with risk-adjusting swaps mainly as a result of the
recognition of net interest revenue.

In accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, J.P. Morgan's
financial instruments are recorded using several methods, including historical
cost and fair or market value. Under the historical cost method, the carrying
value generally represents the amount received when a liability is incurred or
the amount paid to acquire an asset less subsequent amortization and allowances
that reflect management's estimate of uncollectible amounts. This method
differs from the basis of disclosure under SFAS No. 107, which states that
the fair value of a financial instrument is the amount at which the
instrument could be exchanged in a current transaction between willing parties,
other than in a forced or liquidation sale. Therefore, differences between
carrying values under the historical cost accounting method and fair value
estimates can be significant. For example, such differences arise in the case
of the loan portfolio, where the net carrying value represents management's
estimate of ultimately recoverable principal amounts versus fair value estimates
that represent a theoretical exchange value based on current market conditions
that take into account both principal and interest and the timing of cash flows.

EX-13 60th Page of 116 TOC 1st Previous Next Bottom Just 60th

The following table presents the carrying value and fair value of J.P. Morgan's
financial instruments at December 31, 1995 and 1994.

· Enlarge/Download Table

1995 1994
---------------------------- ---------------------------
Appre- Appre-
ciation/ ciation/
Carrying Fair (depre- Carrying Fair (depre-
In billions value value ciation) value value ciation)
----------- -------- ----- -------- -------- ------ ---------

FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS USED FOR
TRADING PURPOSES:
FINANCIAL ASSETS:
Trading account assets (a)................ $69.4 $69.4 - $57.1 $57.1 -
Securities purchased under
agreements to resell and
federal funds sold (b)............... 32.2 32.2 - 21.3 21.3 -
Securities borrowed (c)................... 19.8 19.8 - 12.1 12.1 -
FINANCIAL LIABILITIES:
Trading account liabilities (a)........... 45.3 45.3 - 36.4 36.4 -
Securities sold under agreements
to repurchase and federal funds
purchased (b)........................ 45.1 45.3 ($0.2) 35.7 35.7 -
FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS USED FOR
PURPOSES OTHER THAN TRADING:
FINANCIAL ASSETS: (d)
Debt investment securities................ 24.6 24.6 - 22.7 22.7 -
Net loans................................. 22.3 23.5 1.2 20.9 22.1 $ 1.2
Other financial assets (e)................ 14.2 14.2 - 18.1 18.2 0.1
FINANCIAL LIABILITIES: (d)
Deposits.................................. 46.4 46.5 (0.1) 43.1 43.0 0.1
Related derivatives.................. - (0.1) 0.1 - - -
Other liabilities for borrowed
money................................ 15.1 15.1 - 10.9 10.9 -
Long-term debt (f)........................ 8.6 8.9 (0.3) 6.1 5.9 0.2
Related derivatives.................. - (0.3) 0.3 - 0.1 (0.1)
Other financial liabilities (g)........... 12.9 12.9 - 12.3 12.3 -
OFF-BALANCE-SHEET FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS:
Risk-adjusting swaps (h).................. - 0.4 0.4 - 0.8 0.8
Commitments to extend credit and
standby letters of credit and
guarantees........................... - - - - 0.1 (0.1)
-------- ----- -------- -------- ------ ---------
Excess of net fair values over net
carrying values before
considering income taxes............. 1.4 2.2
-------- ----- -------- -------- ------ ---------

(a) Refer to Note 8 to the financial statements, Trading account assets and
liabilities, for the carrying value and fair value of financial instruments,
including derivatives, used for trading purposes.
(b) These trading-related financial instruments are generally treated as
collateralized lending and borrowing transactions and are carried at the
amounts at which the securities were initially acquired or sold. Securities
sold under agreements to repurchase are also used as one source of financing
for the debt investment securities portfolio.
(c) These trading-related financial instruments that are collateralized by cash
are carried at amounts equal to the collateral advanced.

EX-13 61st Page of 116 TOC 1st Previous Next Bottom Just 61st

(d) Derivatives are used to hedge or modify the interest rate characteristics of
debt investment securities, loans, deposits, other liabilities for borrowed
money, long-term debt, and other financial assets and liabilities. Net
unrealized gains and losses associated with such derivatives contracts
amounted to $195 million and ($59) million at December 31, 1995 and 1994,
respectively. Gross unrealized gains and gross unrealized losses associated
with open derivative contracts used for these purposes at December 31, 1995
and 1994, are presented below. Such amounts primarily relate to interest
rate and currency swaps used to hedge or modify the interest rate
characteristics of long-term debt, deposits, and debt investment securities,
principally mortgage-backed securities.

· Download Table

Gross Gross Net unrealized
In millions: December 31 unrealized gains unrealized losses gains/(losses)
------------------------ ---------------- ----------------- --------------

1995
Long-term debt............... $275 $ 19 $ 256
Debt investment securities... 1 111 (110)
Deposits..................... 57 1 56
Other financial instruments.. 38 45 (7)
---------------- ----------------- --------------
Total........................ 371 176 195
---------------- ----------------- --------------
1994
Long-term debt............... 42 141 (99)
Debt investment securities... 26 20 6
Other financial instruments.. 63 29 34
---------------- ----------------- --------------
Total........................ 131 190 (59)
---------------- ----------------- --------------

(e) Includes cash and due from banks, interest-earning deposits with banks,
customers' acceptance liability, accrued interest and accounts receivable,
and other financial assets.
(f) Estimated fair value for J.P. Morgan's convertible mortgage loan and British
pound financing obligation is not practicable due to the complex terms and
conditions associated with the transactions. For additional information
regarding these financing obligations, see Note 14 to the financial
statements, Long-term debt.
(g) Includes commercial paper, liability on acceptances, accounts payable and
accrued expenses, and other financial liabilities.
(h) Represents the net unrealized gain associated with risk-adjusting swaps and
their related hedges that are entered into to meet longer-term asset and
liability management objectives. The net amount is composed of gross
unrealized gains and gross unrealized losses of $4.4 billion and $4.0
billion respectively at December 31, 1995, and $2.7 billion and $1.9 billion
respectively at December 31, 1994. The unrealized gains and losses related
to the derivative contracts used to hedge these risk-adjusting swaps,
included above, were not material at December 31, 1995 and 1994. There were
no material terminations of risk-adjusting swaps during 1995 or 1994.

The following table summarizes the fair values of all on- and off-balance-sheet
financial instruments according to the valuation methods used to determine fair
value estimates.

· Enlarge/Download Table

Off-balance-
sheet
Financial assets Financial liabilities instruments
--------------------- --------------------- -----------
Carrying Carrying
In billions: December 31 value Fair value value Fair value Fair value
------------------------ -------- ---------- --------- ---------- -----------

1995
Carried at fair or market value............ $ 94.7 $ 94.7 $ 45.3 $45.3 -
Carried at cost:
Carrying value approximates
fair value due to
short-term nature.................... 65.1 65.1 58.1 58.3 -
Fair value based on available
quoted market prices................. 2.8 2.8 5.4 5.4 -
Fair value derived using
estimation techniques................ 19.9 21.1 64.6 64.6 $0.4
-------- ---------- --------- ---------- -----------
182.5 183.7 173.4 173.6 0.4
-------- ---------- --------- ---------- -----------

1994
Carried at fair or market value............ 80.5 80.5 36.4 36.4 -
Carried at cost:
Carrying value approximates
fair value due to
short-term nature..................... 52.3 52.3 46.4 46.4 -
Fair value based on available
quoted market prices.................. 2.4 2.4 3.0 2.9 -
Fair value derived using
estimation techniques................. 17.0 18.3 58.7 58.6 0.7
-------- ---------- --------- ---------- -----------
152.2 153.5 144.5 144.3 0.7
-------- ---------- --------- ---------- -----------

EX-13 62nd Page of 116 TOC 1st Previous Next Bottom Just 62nd

Carried at fair or market value

Trading account assets and liabilities, including derivatives used for trading
purposes, are carried at market value. Debt and marketable equity investment
securities are carried at fair value.

Carried at cost: Carrying value approximates fair value due to short-term nature
For short-term balance sheet instruments without publicly quoted market prices,
the carrying value approximates fair value. These balance sheet instruments
include cash and due from banks, certain securities purchased under agreements
to resell and federal funds sold, securities borrowed, certain loans, customers'
acceptance liability, accrued interest and accounts receivable, certain other
financial assets, certain securities sold under agreements to repurchase and
federal funds purchased, liability on acceptances, accounts payable and accrued
expenses, and certain other financial liabilities. Instruments with a maturity
or repricing profile of one year or less are generally classified as short term.

Carried at cost: Fair value based on available quoted market prices
The fair values of certain loans and other financial assets and certain other
financial liabilities were determined based on quoted market prices for the
instruments or similar issues in their most active market.

Carried at cost: Fair value derived using estimation techniques

The fair values of most financial instruments without quoted market prices are
derived using discount rates that management believes are appropriate. Interest
rates derived from prevailing market yield curves, which closely reflect J.P.
Morgan's interest-earning deposit and borrowing rates, are used to discount
interest-earning deposits, other interest-earning assets, interest-bearing
deposits, other borrowings, long-term repurchase agreements, and risk-adjusting
swaps. In order to estimate fair values for commercial paper, J.P. Morgan's
current commercial paper rates are used; for most long-term debt, J.P. Morgan's
current cost of funds for debt with similar terms and remaining maturities is
used. Loans are discounted at current market rates that are applicable to loans
of similar type, maturity, and credit standing. The fair value of impaired loans
is derived using expected cash flows on a discounted basis. For presentation
purposes, the allowance for credit losses is classified with the carrying value
of loans whose fair value is derived using estimation techniques. Fair values
for equity investment securities for which there are no publicly quoted market
prices are determined by management based on financial and other available
information.

The fair value related to commitments to extend credit and standby letters
of credit and guarantees is derived by comparing the contractual future stream
of fees with such fee streams adjusted to reflect current market rates that
would be applicable to instruments of similar type, maturity, and credit
standing. The fair value of securities lending indemnifications is determined
similarly based on fee streams, which are at market rates since most agreements
mature in less than 30 days.

EX-13 63rd Page of 116 TOC 1st Previous Next Bottom Just 63rd

11. LOANS

Loans at December 31 are summarized in the following table.

· Download Table

In millions 1995 1994
----------- ------- -------

LOANS IN OFFICES IN THE U.S.
Commercial and industrial............................... $ 1 990 $3 047
Financial institution:
Banks.............................................. 729 458
Other financial institutions....................... 527 738
Collateralized by real estate........................... 365 365
Other, including U.S. state and political subdivision... 1 666 1 483
------- -------
5 277 6 091
------- -------
LOANS IN OFFICES OUTSIDE THE U.S.
Commercial and industrial............................... 10 045 8 451
Financial institution:
Banks.............................................. 1 447 1 940
Other financial institutions....................... 3 013 2 460
Collateralized by real estate........................... 281 329
Foreign governments and official institutions........... 1 042 846
Other................................................... 2 348 1 963
------- -------
18 176 15 989
------- -------
23 453 22 080
------- -------

The distribution of total loans at December 31 on the basis of the location of
the borrower is presented in the following table.

· Download Table

In millions 1995 1994
----------- ------- -------

LOANS TO BORROWERS IN THE U.S.
In offices in the U.S................. $ 3 769 $ 5 202
In offices outside the U.S............ 6 702 5 608
------- -------
10 471 10 810
------- -------

LOANS TO BORROWERS OUTSIDE THE U.S.
In offices in the U.S................. 1 508 889
In offices outside the U.S............ 11 474 10 381
------- -------
12 982 11 270
------- -------
23 453 22 080
------- -------

Total impaired loans, net of charge-offs, at December 31 are presented in the
following table. At December 31, 1995, more than half of the impaired loan
balance is measured based upon the present value of expected future cash flows
discounted at an individual loan's effective interest rate, one third is based
on the fair value of the collateral, and the remainder is measured by an
observable market price.

· Download Table

In millions 1995 1994 1993
----------- ----- ----- -----

Commercial and industrial....$ 67 $ 136 $ 182
Other........................ 48 81 92
----- ----- -----
115 217 274
Restructuring countries...... 2 2 8
----- ----- -----
117 219 282
----- ----- -----

Consistent with prior periods, all of J.P. Morgan's impaired loans at December
31, 1995, were on nonaccrual status. Accordingly, comparisons of current
balances with those of prior periods are not affected by the implementation of
SFAS No. 114 and 118.

EX-13 64th Page of 116 TOC 1st Previous Next Bottom Just 64th

As of December 31, 1995, no SFAS No. 114 reserve was required for the $117
million recorded investment in impaired loans. Charge-offs and interest applied
to principal have reduced the recorded investment values to amounts that are
less than the SFAS No. 114 calculated values. For the twelve months ended
December 31, 1995, the average recorded investment in impaired loans was $186
million.

An analysis of the effect of impaired loans, net of charge-offs, on interest
revenue is presented in the following table.

· Enlarge/Download Table

In millions 1995 1994 1993
----------- ----- ------ -----

Interest revenue that would have been recorded if accruing (a)...................... $ 17 $ 18 $ 24
Less interest revenue recorded: (b)
Related to the current period.................................................. 1 5 3
Related to prior periods....................................................... 38 39 167
----- ------ -----
Positive impact of impaired loans on interest revenue............................... 22 26 146
----- ------ -----

(a) Represents $13 million, $13 million, and $14 million from borrowers in the
U.S. and $4 million, $5 million, and $10 million from borrowers outside the
U.S. in 1995, 1994, and 1993 respectively.
(b) Represents $30 million, $4 million, and $5 million from borrowers in the
U.S. and $9 million, $40 million, and $165 million from borrowers outside
the U.S. in 1995, 1994, and 1993 respectively.

12. ALLOWANCE FOR CREDIT LOSSES

An analysis of the allowance for credit losses is presented in the following
table.

· Download Table

In millions 1995 1994 1993
----------- ------ ------ ------

BALANCE, JANUARY 1................................. $1 131 $1 157 $1 258
------ ------ ------
Recoveries......................................... 54 45 60
Charge-offs:
Commercial and industrial..................... (39) (37) (82)
Restructuring countries....................... - (18) (37)
Other......................................... (16) (17) (41)
------ ------ ------
Net charge-offs.................................... (1) (27) (100)
Translation adjustment............................. - 1 (1)
------ ------ ------
BALANCE, DECEMBER 31............................... 1 130 1 131 1 157
------ ------ ------

13. PREMISES AND EQUIPMENT

The components of premises and equipment at December 31 are presented in the
following table.

· Download Table

In millions 1995 1994
----------- ------- -------

Land....................................................... $ 112 $ 113
Buildings.................................................. 958 934
Equipment and furniture.................................... 1 435 1 439
Leasehold improvements..................................... 347 337
Property under financing obligation:
Land and building..................................... 455 460
Construction-in-progress................................... 32 35
------- -------
3 339 3 318
Less: accumulated depreciation............................. 1 412 1 302
------- -------
1 927 2 016
------- -------

Depreciation expense was $247 million in 1995, $231 million in 1994, and $221
million in 1993.
No interest was capitalized in connection with various construction
projects in 1995 or 1994.

EX-13 65th Page of 116 TOC 1st Previous Next Bottom Just 65th

14. LONG-TERM DEBT

Long-term debt qualifying as risk-based capital generally must be unsecured and
subordinated with an original weighted-average maturity of at least five years.
In addition, certain other debt instruments that qualified as capital under
previous regulatory capital guidelines also qualify as risk-based capital.

In order to modify exposure to interest rate and currency exchange rate
movements, J.P. Morgan utilizes derivative instruments, primarily interest
rate and currency swaps, in conjunction with some of its debt issues. The
effect of these derivative instruments is included in the calculation of the
interest expense on the associated debt, and as a result, the effective interest
rates on the debt may differ from the coupon rates reflected in the tables
below. The interest rates shown are those in effect at December 31, 1995, and
in parentheses, at December 31, 1994, excluding the effect of related
derivatives, if any. Floating rates are determined by formulas and may be
subject to certain minimum or maximum rates.

Based solely on the contractual terms of the debt issues, total long-term
debt had a weighted-average interest rate of 6.94% at December 31, 1995. The
weighted-average interest rate for total long-term debt, including the effects
of the related derivative instruments, was 6.01% at December 31, 1995.

The net proceeds of J.P. Morgan's long-term debt may be used for general
corporate purposes or as advances to subsidiaries. J.P. Morgan has the option
to redeem certain debt prior to maturity at specified prices.

Long-term debt qualifying as risk-based capital and other long-term
debt at December 31 are presented in the following tables.

LONG-TERM DEBT QUALIFYING AS RISK-BASED CAPITAL

· Enlarge/Download Table

Amount outstanding
Maturity Interest -------------------
Dollars in millions date rate 1995 1994
------------------- --------- ------------------------- ------ -------

J.P. MORGAN (PARENT)
Floating-rate subordinated deutsche mark notes..................... 1995 5.44% - $ 258
Zero-coupon subordinated notes (a)................................. 1998 8.66 $ 331 304
Convertible debentures (b)......................................... 1998 4 3/4 2 2
Subordinated notes................................................. 1998-2004 7 5/8 747 717
Subordinated notes................................................. 1998-2010 6 1/4-8 1/2 (8 1/2-9 5/8) 748 449
Floating-rate subordinated notes................................... 2000-2005 5.3-5.76 (5.37-6.13) 940 940
Subordinated notes................................................. 2002-2009 5 3/4-7 1/4 649 649
Subordinated Italian lira notes.................................... 2003 8 81 79
Subordinated Canadian dollar notes................................. 2004 6 7/8 185 180
Subordinated Japanese yen loan..................................... 2005 4.78 97 -

MORGAN GUARANTY
Subordinated notes................................................. 1996 8 1/8 100 100
Subordinated notes................................................. 2002 7 3/8 199 199
--------- ------------------------- ------ -------
4 079 3 877
Less: amortization for risk-based capital
purposes (c).................................................. (489) (680)
--------- ------------------------- ------ -------
Total long-term debt qualifying as risk-based
capital....................................................... 3 590 3 197
--------- ------------------------- ------ -------

(a) The principal amount of these notes is $400 million. The rate shown for
these notes, which do not bear interest, represents a level yield to
maturity. The carrying value increases as the discount on the notes is
accreted to interest expense.
(b) At December 31, 1995, these debentures were convertible into 86,400 shares
of J.P. Morgan common stock at $20 per share.
(c) The balance of debt qualifying as risk-based capital is reduced 20% per year
during each of the last five years prior to maturity.

EX-13 66th Page of 116 TOC 1st Previous Next Bottom Just 66th

LONG-TERM DEBT NOT QUALIFYING AS RISK-BASED CAPITAL

· Enlarge/Download Table

Maturity Interest Amount outstanding
Dollars in millions date rate 1995 1994
------------------- --------- -------------------- ------ -------

J.P. MORGAN (PARENT)
Notes............................................... 1995 5 3/8% - $ 250
Notes............................................... 1997 6 1/2-8 (6 1/2) $ 804 303
Floating-rate notes................................. 1997 5.93 500 -
South African rand notes............................ 1997 14 1/2 69 -
Deutsche mark notes................................. 1998 7 1/4 177 165
Swiss franc notes................................... 1999-2003 4 5/8-5 1/2 (5) 442 116
Netherlands guilder notes........................... 2000 6 157 -
Notes, Series B-E (a)............................... 2008-2009 7.7 425 425
Convertible mortgage loan (b)....................... 2018 7 1/2 407 407

MORGAN GUARANTY
Mortgages payable................................... 1995-1996 various - 3
Zero-coupon notes (c)............................... 1995-1997 4.46-4.89 (3.88-4.87) 23 45
Zero-coupon notes (c)............................... 1995-1997 5.79-6.39 (5.09-6.39) 31 52
Notes............................................... 1995-2001 5.78-8.4 (7-11 3/8) 684 294
Floating-rate notes................................. 1996 5.79-6.86 (6.98) 700 200
Floating-rate deutsche mark notes................... 1996-1997 4.13-4.38 (5.48-5.75) 24 23
Italian lira notes.................................. 1997 11 3/8 111 108
Floating-rate Portuguese escudo notes............... 1998 9.69 100 -
Floating-rate notes................................. 1999-2005 4.92-6.24 (5 1/2) 260 200
Notes (d)........................................... 2001 6.06 40 25
British pound financing obligation (e).............. - - 294 309
--------- -------------------- ------ -------
5 248 2 925
--------- -------------------- ------ -------
Add: amortization for risk-based capital
purposes (f)................................... 489 680
--------- -------------------- ------ -------
Total long-term debt not qualifying as
risk-based capital............................. 5 737 3 605
--------- -------------------- ------ -------

(a) The interest rates on these notes will be reset during 1998 for the
following 10-year term at a rate based on the interest rate for 10-year U.S.
Treasury securities at that time.
(b) Interest on the notes increases 1/2% every four years from 7%, as set in
1988, to 9% in 2004. After 2008 the rate will be fixed based upon the
interest rate for 10-year U.S. Treasury securities at that time. Beginning
in 2008 the loan may be converted, at the option of the lender, into a 49%
interest in the J.P. Morgan building at 60 Wall Street. If the loan is
converted, J.P. Morgan will have the option to lease the property for seven
10-year terms. J.P. Morgan has the right to prepay the debt if the lender
does not exercise the conversion option. The loan is collateralized by the
60 Wall Street building owned by Morgan Guaranty.
(c) The rates shown for these notes, which do not bear interest, represent a
level yield to maturity.
(d) The interest rate on these notes will be reset during 1997 to 5.775% for the
following four-year term.
(e) Represents the sale of a 52.5% interest in J.P. Morgan's office building
complex in London. The transaction is treated as a financing obligation,
which is being amortized over a 25-year period, corresponding with J.P.
Morgan's initial lease term for the entire complex. J.P. Morgan has renewal
options to lease this space for an additional 50 years. The lease contains
escalation clauses under which rental payments will be redetermined every
five years, beginning after year 15. Interest on the financing obligation is
imputed annually at an effective rate that varies depending on then-current
rental rates in the London real estate market.

The aggregate amounts of minimum cash payments (at the December 31, 1995,
exchange rate) to be applied to the financing obligation for each of the five
years subsequent to December 31, 1995, and thereafter are presented in the
following table.

· Download Table

In millions
-----------

1996.............................................. $ 23
1997.............................................. 24
1998.............................................. 24
1999.............................................. 24
2000.............................................. 24
2001 and later.................................... 280
-----
Total cash payments............................... 399
Less: interest.................................... 105
-----
Balance outstanding at December 31, 1995.......... 294
-----

(f) The balance of debt qualifying as risk-based capital is reduced 20% per year
during each of the last five years prior to maturity.

EX-13 67th Page of 116 TOC 1st Previous Next Bottom Just 67th

Maturities

The aggregate amounts of maturities and announced redemptions for the five years
subsequent to December 31, 1995, excluding the British pound financing
obligation noted above, are $1,164 million (1996), $1,495 million (1997), $1,035
million (1998), $314 million (1999), and $747 million (2000).

15. INCOME TAXES

J.P. Morgan and eligible subsidiaries file a consolidated U.S. federal income
tax return. The current and deferred portions of income tax expense included in
the consolidated statement of income, excluding the cumulative effect of
adopting SFAS No. 106 in 1993, are presented in the following table.

· Enlarge/Download Table

In millions 1995 1994 1993
----------- ------------------------- ------------------------- -------------------------
INCOME TAX EXPENSE
(BENEFIT) Current Deferred Total Current Deferred Total Current Deferred Total
------- -------- ----- ------- -------- ----- ------- -------- -----

U.S.................. $ 43 $ (3) $ 40 $161 $ 91 $252 $ 289 $ 44 $333
Foreign.............. 505 (4) 501 243 16 259 567 (106) 461
State and local...... 114 (45) 69 115 (16) 99 196 (22) 174
------- -------- ----- ------- -------- ----- ------- -------- -----
662 (52) 610 519 91 610 1 052 (84) 968
------- -------- ----- ------- -------- ----- ------- -------- -----

The income tax expense related to net investment securities gains, included in
Income taxes, was $8 million in 1995, $50 million in 1994, and $132 million in
1993.

Deferred tax assets and liabilities at December 31, 1995, 1994, and 1993,
resulted from the items listed in the following table.

· Download Table

In millions 1995 1994 1993
----------- ------ ------ ------

DEFERRED TAX ASSETS
Compensation and benefits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 646 $ 454 $ 390
Allowance for credit losses . . . . . . . . . . . . . 444 444 454
Foreign operations. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 82 88 85
Write-down of equity investment securities. . . . . . 54 52 53
Other. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 199 129 172
------ ------ ------
Total deferred tax assets before valuation allowance 1 425 1 167 1 154
Less: valuation allowance (a) 140 140 150
------ ------ ------
Total deferred tax assets 1 285 1 027 1 004
------ ------ ------
DEFERRED TAX LIABILITIES

Gains on debt and equity investment securities. . . . 564 342 724
Lease financing transactions. . . . . . . . . . . . . 135 120 114
Unremitted earnings. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . 86 67 49
Interest rate and currency swaps . . . . . . . . . . 68 99 129
Depreciation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43 44 47
Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 241 219 120
------ ------ ------
Total deferred tax liabilities 1 137 891 1 183
------ ------ ------

(a) The valuation allowance is primarily related to the ability to recognize tax
benefits associated with foreign operations.

EX-13 68th Page of 116 TOC 1st Previous Next Bottom Just 68th

J.P. Morgan recorded a deferred income tax liability of $358 million, $274
million, and $724 million at December 31, 1995, 1994, and 1993, respectively
related to the net unrealized gains on investment securities classified as
available for sale under SFAS No. 115.

A reconciliation of the difference between the expected U.S. statutory income
tax rate and J.P. Morgan's effective income tax rate, excluding the cumulative
effect of adopting SFAS No. 106 in 1993, is shown in the following table.

· Download Table

% of pretax income 1995 1994 1993
------------------ ---- ---- ----

U.S. statutory tax rate...................................... 35.0% 35.0% 35.0%
Increase (decrease) due to:
State and local taxes, net of U.S. income tax effects... 2.4 3.5 4.2
Tax-exempt income....................................... (6.7) (3.7) (3.0)
Other................................................... 1.3 (1.4) (0.2)
---- ---- ----
Effective tax rate........................................... 32.0 33.4 36.0
---- ---- ----

Pretax income

The following table presents Income before income taxes and cumulative effect of
accounting change reported by location of office. This presentation differs from
the basis of disclosure of U.S., foreign, and state and local tax expense above
and from the basis of disclosure of U.S.-related and foreign-country-related
income in Note 23 to the financial statements, U.S.-related and foreign-country-
related operations.

· Download Table

In millions 1995 1994 1993
----------- ------ ------ ------

Offices in the U.S. . . . $ 455 $ 908 $ 227
Offices outside the U.S.. 1 451 917 2 464
------ ------ ------
1 906 1 825 2 691
------ ------ ------

16. PREFERRED STOCK

Total authorized shares of preferred stock are 10,000,000. J.P. Morgan may
redeem the outstanding preferred stock, in whole or in part, at its option, for
the stated value plus accrued and unpaid dividends. All preferred stock has a
dividend preference as well as a liquidation preference and is generally
nonvoting. Preferred stock outstanding at December 31 is presented in the
following table.

· Enlarge/Download Table

Authorized, issued,
and outstanding shares Dividend rate (a)
1995 and 1994 1995 1994
---------------------- ---- ----

Adjustable Rate Cumulative Preferred Stock,
Series A (stated value: $100 per share)......... 2 444 300 5.00% 5.00%
Variable Cumulative Preferred Stock, Series
B, C, D, E, and F (authorized, issued, and
outstanding: 50 000 shares each series;
stated value: $1 000 per share)................. 250 000 4.28-4.56 4.30-4.80

(a) Series A: The quarterly dividend rate is determined by a formula based on
the interest rates of certain actively traded U.S. Treasury obligations. The
quarterly rate in no event will be less than 5.00% or greater than 11.50%
per annum. The Series A preferred stock qualifies as Tier 1 capital. Series
B, C, D, E, and F: Dividend rates for each series are determined
periodically either by auction or remarketing. The dividend rates may not
exceed certain maximums that are 110% to 200% of various market interest
rates, depending on the prevailing rating of the stock at the dividend
determination dates and the duration of the then-current dividend periods.
The dividend periods may vary from one day to 30 years, depending on the
dividend determination method used. During 1995 and 1994, J.P. Morgan reset
the dividend rates approximately every 49 days. The dividend rates stated
above represent the range of those in effect at year-end. These series of
preferred stock qualify as Tier 2 capital.

EX-13 69th Page of 116 TOC 1st Previous Next Bottom Just 69th

17. PENSION BENEFITS

Pension plans are in effect for substantially all regular employees of J.P.
Morgan. J.P. Morgan's pension plans are generally noncontributory defined
benefit plans. The plans' pension benefits are generally based on age and years
of credited service and a percentage of qualifying compensation during the final
years of employment.

J.P. Morgan's policy generally has been to contribute currently the accrued
costs of its funded pension plans. The principal U.S. plan continues to meet
legal funding requirements. Contributions to that plan were $26 million in 1995
and $63 million in 1994; no contributions were made in 1993. The accrued costs
of certain other pension plans are not contributed currently, since
contributions to these unfunded plans are not tax deductible.

For J.P. Morgan's domestic and foreign funded plans, the value of plan
assets exceeded accumulated benefits at September 30, 1995 and 1994 (the dates
of the actuarial valuations). The following table presents information related
to these plans, including the amounts recorded on the consolidated balance
sheet.

· Enlarge/Download Table

In millions 1995 1994
----------- ------ ------

Plan assets (a)................................................................. $1 175 $1 029
Less: accumulated benefits earned prior to valuation date (b)
Vested..................................................................... 763 699
Nonvested.................................................................. 112 19
------ ------
Accumulated benefit obligation (b)......................................... 875 718
------ ------
Funded status of accumulated benefit obligation................................. 300 311
Less: additional benefits based on estimated future salary levels (b)........... 209 222
------ ------
Funded status of projected benefit obligation (c)............................... 91 89
Amounts available to increase (reduce) future pension expense:
Unamortized balance of the initial transition amount (d)................... (42) (49)
Cumulative net actuarial gain, including deferred investment results (e)... (27) (34)
Costs of retroactive benefits granted by plan amendments................... 38 28
------ ------
Net amounts available to decrease expense in future periods................ (31) (55)
------ ------
Net prepaid pension cost recorded on the consolidated balance sheet............. 60 34
------ ------

(a) Plan assets, which are at fair value, are managed by a trustee and are
generally invested in fixed income securities, listed stocks, and commingled
pension trust funds.
(b) Expressed as the actuarial present value.
(c) The projected benefit obligation, which equals the sum of the accumulated
benefit obligation and additional benefits based on estimated future salary
levels, was $1,084 million and $940 million at September 30, 1995 and 1994,
respectively.
(d) To be recognized ratably as a reduction of pension expense through 1999.
(e) Actuarial gains and losses result from experience that differs from that
assumed or from a change in an actuarial assumption.

Obligations related to unfunded pension plans are recorded as a liability on the
consolidated balance sheet. At December 31, 1995 and 1994, such obligations
were $112 million and $102 million respectively.

The following table presents the components of 1995, 1994, and 1993 pension
expense for all defined benefit pension plans. The pension expense related to
defined contribution pension plans continues to be immaterial.

· Enlarge/Download Table

In millions 1995 1994 1993
----------- ------ ------ ------

Cost of benefits earned during the period. . . . . . . . . $ 60 $ 67 $ 51
Interest cost on the projected benefit obligation. . . . . 87 81 75
Assumed return on all pension plan assets (a). . . . . . . (98) (89) (87)
Amortization, primarily of the initial transition amount . (6) (3) (5)
------ ------ ------
Pension expense reflected in Employee compensation and benefits 43 56 34
------ ------ ------

(a) For the twelve-month periods ended September 30, 1995, 1994, and 1993, the
actual returns on plan assets were $141 million, $33 million, and $155
million respectively. The differences between the actual and assumed amounts
have been deferred.

EX-13 70th Page of 116 TOC 1st Previous Next Bottom Just 70th

The following table presents weighted-average actuarial assumptions used to
calculate the projected benefit obligation and pension expense. Assumptions at
September 30 are used to calculate the projected benefit obligation as of that
date and determine the pension expense for the following fiscal year.

· Download Table

1995 1994 1993
----- ----- -----

Assumptions at September 30:
Assumed rate of return...................... 9.3% 9.5% 9.5%
Future annual compensation increases........ 5.1 6.0 5.0
Discount rate............................... 7.4 8.3 7.0
----- ----- -----
Pension expense for the year ended December 31:
Assumed rate of return...................... 9.5% 9.5% 10.4%
Future annual compensation increases........ 6.0 5.0 5.6
Discount rate............................... 8.3 7.0 8.0
----- ----- -----

18. POSTRETIREMENT BENEFITS OTHER THAN PENSIONS

U.S. employees retiring with J.P. Morgan who were hired before February 1, 1989,
and who have completed ten years of continuous service with J.P. Morgan may be
eligible for pensioner health care and pensioner life insurance coverage,
although J.P. Morgan has no contractual obligation to provide this coverage.
Eligible employees retiring after July 1, 1992, will absorb a greater proportion
of the cost of health care than those who retired on or before July 1, 1992.
U.S. employees hired on or after February 1, 1989, are not eligible for
pensioner health care coverage but may be eligible for limited pensioner life
insurance coverage when they retire. Postretirement benefit eligibility
requirements for non-U.S. employees vary from country to country.

Effective November 21, 1994, J.P. Morgan began to fund its postretirement
benefit obligations through the purchase of corporate-owned life insurance
(COLI) on the lives of eligible employees and retirees. Assets attributable to
the COLI policy are held in a separate account at the insurance company, and the
cash value of the policy is invested by the insurance company in equity
securities and/or bonds or other debt instruments. The COLI policy is owned by
J.P. Morgan; however, the COLI proceeds (i.e., death benefits, withdrawals, and
other distributions) are segregated and restricted to reimbursing J.P. Morgan
for its net postretirement benefit claim payments and related administrative
expenses.

The following table reconciles the actuarial present value of J.P. Morgan's
accumulated postretirement benefit obligation (APBO) relating to health care and
life insurance at September 30, the date of the actuarial valuation, to the
amount recorded on the consolidated balance sheet at December 31.

· Enlarge/Download Table

In millions 1995 1994
----- -----

Actuarial present value of APBO:
Retirees........................................................................... $ 97 $ 87
Fully eligible active participants................................................. 22 22
Other active participants.......................................................... 83 90
----- -----
Total APBO at September 30.............................................................. 202 199
Cumulative net actuarial gain, including deferred investment results (a)................ 73 58
Fair value of COLI policy at December 31................................................ (91) (40)
----- -----
Net accrued postretirement benefit liability recorded on the consolidated balance sheet. 184 217
----- -----

(a) Actuarial gains and losses result from experience that differs from that
assumed or from a change in an actuarial assumption.

The following table presents the components of 1995, 1994, and 1993
postretirement benefit expense.

· Enlarge/Download Table

In millions 1995 1994 1993
----- ----- -----

Cost of benefits earned during the period.............................. $ 6 $ 9 $ 8
Interest cost on APBO.................................................. 17 18 18
Assumed return on COLI policy (a)...................................... (3) - -
Amortization of unrecognized net gains................................. (2) - -
----- ----- -----
Expense reflected in Employee compensation and benefits................ 18 27 26
Transition obligation, recorded on January 1, 1993,
as a one-time cumulative nonoperating charge...................... - - 211
----- ----- -----
Total postretirement benefit expense................................... 18 27 237
----- ----- -----

(a) For the twelve-month period ended September 30, 1995, the actual return was
$9 million. The difference between the actual and assumed amounts has been
deferred.

EX-13 71st Page of 116 TOC 1st Previous Next Bottom Just 71st

The following table presents actuarial assumptions used to calculate the APBO
and postretirement benefit expense. Assumptions at September 30 are used to
calculate the APBO as of that date and determine postretirement benefit expense
for the following fiscal year.

· Enlarge/Download Table

1995 1994 1993
---- ---- ----

Assumptions at September 30:
Assumed rate of return........................................ 9.0% 9.0% -
Future annual compensation increases, affecting the APBO for
pensioner life insurance only................................. 4.8 5.5 4.5%
Health-care cost trend rate:
First year.................................................... 12.0 15.0 15.5
Ultimate rate after gradual decreases until the year 2009..... 5.5 5.5 5.5
Discount rate................................................. 7.5 8.5 7.0

If the assumed health-care cost trend rate were increased one percentage point
in each future year, annual postretirement benefit expense would have increased
by $2 million in 1995 and $3 million in 1994 and 1993. In addition, the APBO as
of September 30 would have increased by $16 million, $20 million, and $25
million for 1995, 1994, and 1993 respectively.

19. STOCK OPTIONS AND AWARDS

Common stock

J.P. Morgan's stock option and award plans provide for the issuance of stock-
related awards to key employees, such as stock options, stock appreciation
rights, restricted stock awards, stock bonus awards, and stock unit awards. To
satisfy awards granted under the plans, common stock may be made available from
J.P. Morgan's authorized but unissued shares. Shares may also be purchased on
the open market at various times during the year. In 1995 a new plan was
approved authorizing 28,000,000 shares for future grant. Shares available for
future grant under the plans totaled 29,462,846 at December 31, 1995.

In 1993, J.P. Morgan reclassified its accumulated obligations under various
stock award plans from accounts payable and accrued expenses to stockholders'
equity. At year-end 1993, the reclassification resulted in a $253 million
increase to equity capital. This reclassification more appropriately reflects
the firm's obligation to settle these awards by issuing its common stock.

Stock options:

Stock options are issued at prices not less than the fair market value on the
date of grant. Stock options are generally exercisable commencing one to three
years following the date of grant and in no event later than ten years from the
date of grant. The following is a summary of options transactions during 1995,
1994, and 1993.

· Download Table

Shares under Option price
option per share
------------ -------------------

Balance, December 31, 1992...... 15 243 300 $17 15/16 to 66 1/8
Granted.................... 4 531 750 60 3/4
Exercised.................. (2 011 346) 17 15/16 to 66 1/8
Canceled................... (230 750)
------------ -------------------
Balance, December 31, 1993...... 17 532 954 17 15/16 to 66 1/8
Granted.................... 4 541 600 71
Exercised.................. (946 955) 17 15/16 to 66 1/8
Canceled................... (402 579)
------------ -------------------
Balance, December 31, 1994...... 20 725 020 24 3/32 to 71
Granted.................... 7 166 952 60 1/2 to 85
Exercised.................. (3 128 485) 24 3/32 to 71
Canceled................... (437 566)
------------ -------------------
Balance, December 31, 1995...... 24 325 921 31 5/16 to 85
------------ -------------------
Exercisable at December 31,
1993....................... 11 048 204 17 15/16 to 66 1/8
1994....................... 14 229 295 24 3/32 to 66 1/8
1995....................... 15 179 860 31 5/16 to 71
------------ -------------------

EX-13 72nd Page of 116 TOC 1st Previous Next Bottom Just 72nd

In January 1996, J.P. Morgan granted 4,708,808 options at an option price of
$75.625.

Restricted stock, stock bonus, and stock unit awards:

Restricted stock is awarded in the form of share credits, each of which is
equivalent to one share of J.P. Morgan common stock. Restricted stock awards
generally become fully vested on the fifth anniversary of the date of the award.
Payment of the award generally may be made to the participant as soon as
practicable after the award has become vested, but may be deferred at the
discretion of a committee of the Board of Directors administering the plans. At
December 31, 1995, 1994, and 1993, total share credits representing previously
granted restricted stock awards, including share credits attributable to
dividend equivalents, were 2,968,840 credits, 2,146,629 credits, and 1,524,733
credits respectively. In January 1996, 318,642 share credits representing
restricted stock awards were granted.

Stock bonus awards are substantially similar to restricted stock awards,
except that stock bonus awards generally become vested on the third anniversary
of the date of the award. Payment of stock bonus awards may be made to the
participant as soon as practicable after the award has become vested, but may be
deferred at the discretion of a committee of the Board of Directors
administering the plans. At December 31, 1995, 1994, and 1993, total share
credits representing previously granted stock bonus awards, including share
credits attributable to dividend equivalents, were 2,603,378 credits, 1,573,006
credits, and 871,292 credits respectively. In January 1996, 1,577,334 share
credits representing stock bonus awards were granted.

Stock unit awards are substantially similar to restricted stock and stock
bonus awards, except the value of a stock unit award will never exceed (but may
be less than) the dollar value of the initial award. Stock unit awards generally
become fully vested on either the third or fifth anniversary of the date of the
award. At December 31, 1994, no stock unit awards had been granted. At December
31, 1995, total share credits representing previously granted stock unit awards,
including share credits attributable to dividend equivalents, were 52,533
credits. In January 1996, 123,364 share credits representing stock unit awards
were granted.

Redeemable preferred stock

J.P. Morgan may award redeemable preferred stock to certain employees. The
redeemable preferred stock is redeemable at any time by the stockholder. J.P.
Morgan may also call the outstanding redeemable preferred stock, in whole, upon
30 days' notice after 60 days from issuance. At December 31, 1995 and 1994,
approximately 1.7 million and 1.0 million shares respectively of the redeemable
preferred stock had been authorized, and there were no shares issued or
outstanding. In 1995, shares of this stock were awarded to employees, and all
shares were redeemed by those employees. Shares were also awarded to employees
in January 1996, and substantially all of these shares have been redeemed by
those employees.

EX-13 73rd Page of 116 TOC 1st Previous Next Bottom Just 73rd

20. EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE

In the calculation of primary and fully diluted earnings per common share, net
income is adjusted by adding back to net income the interest expense on
convertible debentures and the expense related to dividend equivalents on
certain deferred incentive compensation awards, net of the related income tax
effects, and deducting the preferred stock dividends.

Primary and fully diluted earnings per common share in 1995, 1994, and 1993
are computed by dividing income components by the weighted-average number of
common and common equivalent shares outstanding during the year.

For the primary earnings per share calculation, the weighted-average number
of common and common equivalent shares outstanding includes the average number
of shares of common stock outstanding, the average number of shares issuable
upon conversion of convertible debentures, and the average number of shares
issuable under employee benefit plans that have a dilutive effect.

The weighted-average number of common and common equivalent shares
outstanding, assuming full dilution, includes the average number of shares of
common stock outstanding, the average number of shares issuable upon conversion
of convertible debentures, and the average number of shares issuable under
various employee benefit plans. The maximum dilutive effect is computed using
the period-end market price of J.P. Morgan common stock, if it is higher than
the average market price used in calculating primary earnings per share.

· Enlarge/Download Table

Dollars in millions 1995 1994 1993
------------ ------------ ------------

Adjusted income before cumulative
effect of accounting change............................. $ 1 275 $ 1 198 $ 1 705
Cumulative effect of change in method of accounting for
postretirement benefits, net of related income taxes.... - - (137)
Adjusted net income.......................................... 1 275 1 198 1 568

Primary earnings per share:
Weighted-average number of common and common
equivalent shares outstanding........................... 198 654 973 199 056 561 201 073 125
Fully diluted earnings per share:
Weighted-average number of common and common
equivalent shares outstanding, assuming full dilution... 200 613 199 199 056 809 201 116 329
------------ ------------ ------------

21. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENT LIABILITIES

Excluding mortgaged properties, assets carried at approximately $53.1 billion
and approximately $49.5 billion in the consolidated balance sheet at December
31, 1995 and 1994, respectively were pledged as collateral for borrowings, to
qualify for fiduciary powers, to secure public monies as required by law, and
for other purposes.

In compliance with rules and regulations established by various domestic
and foreign regulators, cash of $96 million and $113 million and securities with
a market value of $1,786 million and $1,024 million were segregated in special
bank accounts for the benefit of securities and futures brokerage customers at
December 31, 1995 and 1994, respectively.

Operating expenses include net rentals of $115 million in 1995, $94 million
in 1994, and $83 million in 1993. Minimum rental commitments on noncancellable
leases for premises and equipment are $1,050 million in the aggregate, and for
each of the five years subsequent to December 31, 1995, are $118 million (1996),
$102 million (1997), $91 million (1998), $64 million (1999), and $62 million
(2000). Certain leases contain renewal options and escalation clauses.

In the ordinary course of business, J.P. Morgan guarantees the performance
of certain obligations of certain subsidiaries and affiliates. It is not
anticipated that these agreements will have a material effect on the results of
operations of J.P. Morgan.

Various legal actions and proceedings are pending against or involve J.P.
Morgan and its subsidiaries. Management, after reviewing with counsel all
actions and proceedings pending against or involving J.P. Morgan and its
subsidiaries, considers that the aggregate liability or loss, if any, resulting
from them will not be material.

EX-13 74th Page of 116 TOC 1st Previous Next Bottom Just 74th

22. CONCENTRATIONS OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

J.P. Morgan's clients and other counterparties to the company's on- and off-
balance-sheet financial instruments operate in diverse industries of the world
economy, most significantly in the United States and Europe, and include nonbank
financial institutions, governments, and banks.

Summarized in the following tables are the amounts of credit exposure
associated with the company's on- and off-balance-sheet financial instruments
allocated to the industries and geographic areas of the ultimate obligors at
December 31, 1995 and 1994. The amounts below do not consider $91.2 billion and
$87.5 billion of cash and marketable security collateral at December 31, 1995
and 1994, respectively related mainly to loans, resale agreements, securities
lending indemnifications, and amounts receivable for securities sold not yet
settled, that are available to J.P. Morgan to limit these credit exposures.

· Enlarge/Download Table

Nonbank
financial Govern-
In billions: December 31 institutions (a) ments Banks All other Total
---------------- ------- ------ --------- -----

1995
On-balance-sheet:
U.S...................................... $23.7 $32.2 $20.3 $16.5 $ 92.7
Europe (b)............................... 13.5 20.3 13.4 9.5 56.7
Asia and Pacific......................... 1.7 7.1 3.4 2.4 14.6
Western hemisphere, excluding U.S........ 8.6 6.0 2.1 3.4 20.1
------------- ------- ------ --------- -----
Total on-balance-sheet credit exposure... 47.5 65.6 39.2 31.8 184.1(c)
------------- ------- ------ --------- -----
Off-balance-sheet:
U.S...................................... 22.6 5.9 3.5 33.6 65.6
Europe (b)............................... 10.3 5.8 6.3 8.4 30.8
Asia and Pacific......................... 0.4 1.0 2.3 2.3 6.0
Western hemisphere, excluding U.S........ 2.4 1.4 0.3 0.8 4.9
------------- ------- ------ --------- -----
Total off-balance-sheet credit exposure.. 35.7 14.1 12.4 45.1 107.3
------------- ------- ------ --------- -----
Total credit exposure.................... 83.2 79.7 51.6 76.9(d) 291.4
------------- ------- ------ --------- -----
Cash and marketable security
collateral.......................... 53.8 1.7 26.1 9.6 91.2
------------- ------- ------ --------- -----
1994
On-balance-sheet:
U.S...................................... 18.2 31.9 13.1 19.3 82.5
Europe (b)............................... 8.8 18.8 13.4 6.9 47.9
Asia and Pacific......................... 2.4 3.2 4.1 2.1 11.8
Western hemisphere, excluding U.S........ 1.2 5.8 2.0 2.8 11.8
------------- ------- ------ --------- -----
Total on-balance-sheet credit exposure... 30.6 59.7 32.6 31.1 154.0(c)
------------- ------- ------ --------- -----
Off-balance-sheet:
U.S...................................... 33.8 2.3 3.9 28.7 68.7
Europe (b)............................... 10.6 4.0 6.1 5.2 25.9
Asia and Pacific......................... 3.0 2.6 0.8 0.5 6.9
Western hemisphere, excluding U.S........ 1.1 0.5 1.0 0.6 3.2
------------- ------- ------ --------- -----
Total off-balance-sheet credit exposure.. 48.5 9.4 11.8 35.0 104.7
------------- ------- ------ --------- -----
Total credit exposure.................... 79.1 69.1 44.4 66.1(d) 258.7
------------- ------- ------ --------- -----
Cash and marketable security
collateral.......................... 56.2 4.5 21.8 5.0 87.5
------------- ------- ------ --------- -----

(a) Nonbank financial institutions include securities firms, insurance
companies, and investment companies.
(b) Includes Middle East and Africa.
(c) On-balance-sheet items without credit exposure totaled $0.8 billion and $0.9
billion in 1995 and 1994 respectively.
(d) No single industry in this category exceeded 10% of this amount at December
31, 1995 and 1994.

EX-13 75th Page of 116 TOC 1st Previous Next Bottom Just 75th

23. U.S.-RELATED AND FOREIGN-COUNTRY-RELATED OPERATIONS

For reporting purposes only, operations of J.P. Morgan are divided into
components identified as "U.S.-related" and "foreign-country-related."
Management believes that the methodology used to allocate J.P. Morgan's results
between foreign and domestic sources, while inexact, is an appropriate one.

Assets

Assets are distributed on the basis of the location of the borrower or obligor,
with the exception of interest-earning deposits with banks, which are
distributed based on the location of the institution receiving the deposit, and
trading account assets, premises and equipment, accrued interest and accounts
receivable, and other assets, which are distributed based on the location of the
office recording the asset.

Assets at December 31 were distributed among geographic regions as shown in the
table below.

· Enlarge/Download Table

Dollars in millions, % of total assets 1995 1994 1993
-------------- ------------- -------------

-------- --- -------- --- -------- ---
Europe (a)............................................. $ 73 040 40% $ 63 939 41% $ 48 248 36%
Western hemisphere, excluding U.S...................... 13 543 7 6 914 5 6 416 5
Asia and Pacific....................................... 7 753 4 5 840 4 5 888 4
-------- --- -------- --- -------- ---
Total foreign-country-related assets................... 94 336 51 76 693 50 60 552 45
Total U.S.-related assets.............................. 90 543 49 78 224 50 73 336 55
-------- --- -------- --- -------- ---
Consolidated total assets.............................. 184 879 100 154 917 100 133 888 100
-------- --- -------- --- -------- ---

(a) Includes Middle East and Africa.

Revenues and expenses

Because the operations of J.P. Morgan are highly integrated, an identification
of revenues and expenses as U.S.-related or foreign-country-related necessarily
involves estimates and assumptions. Interest revenue is distributed according to
the location of the borrower from whom the revenue is earned, except for
interest on trading-related assets and other interest-earning assets, which is
distributed based on the location of the office recording the assets. Interest
expense is allocated based on the distribution of interest revenue. The benefit
of capital is allocated based on the proportion of average assets attributed to
each geographic region. Noninterest revenue is generally distributed based on
the location of the office recording the revenue. Allocations are made of
expenses incurred in one component of operations on behalf of another, and
adjustments are made for differences between U.S. and foreign-country income tax
rates.

EX-13 76th Page of 116 TOC 1st Previous Next Bottom Just 76th

On the basis described above, the respective contributions of U.S.-related
and foreign-country-related operations to the results of J.P. Morgan in 1995,
1994, and 1993 are estimated in the following table.

· Enlarge/Download Table

Western
hemi- Total
sphere, Asia foreign- Total
excluding and country- U.S.- Consoli-
In millions Europe (a) U.S. Pacific related related dated
--------- --------- ------- -------- ------- --------

1995
Total revenues....................... $5 301 $780 $964 $7 045 $6 793 $13 838
Total expenses....................... 4 061 575 766 5 402 6 530 11 932
Income before income taxes........... 1 240 205 198 1 643 263 1 906
Income tax expense (benefit)......... 498 82 79 659 (49) 610
Net income........................... 742 123 119 984 312 1 296
--------- --------- ------- -------- ------- --------
1994
Total revenues....................... 4 432 381 617 5 430 6 485 11 915
Total expenses....................... 3 542 354 664 4 560 5 530 10 090
Income (loss) before income taxes.... 890 27 (47) 870 955 1 825
Income tax expense (benefit)......... 355 11 (19) 347 263 610
Net income (loss).................... 535 16 (28) 523 692 1 215
--------- --------- ------- -------- ------- --------
1993
Total revenues....................... 5 042 570 643 6 255 5 686 11 941
Total expenses....................... 3 380 338 568 4 286 4 964 9 250
Income before income taxes and
cumulative effect of
accounting change............... 1 662 232 75 1 969 722 2 691
Income tax expense................... 657 92 29 778 190 968
Income before cumulative effect of
accounting change............... 1 005 140 46 1 191 532 1 723
Cumulative effect of accounting
change.......................... - - - - (137) (137)
Net income........................... 1 005 140 46 1 191 395 1 586
--------- --------- ------- -------- ------- --------

(a) Includes Middle East and Africa.

In these years, the only foreign country estimated to have accounted for 10% or
more of total revenues was the United Kingdom (21% in 1995, 16% in 1994, and 17%
in 1993).

EX-13 77th Page of 116 TOC 1st Previous Next Bottom Just 77th

24. CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF J.P. MORGAN (PARENT)

Presented below are the condensed statement of income, balance sheet, and
statement of cash flows for J.P. Morgan & Co. Incorporated, the parent company.

STATEMENT OF INCOME

J.P. Morgan (parent)

· Enlarge/Download Table

In millions 1995 1994 1993
------ ------ ------

REVENUE
Equity in undistributed earnings of subsidiaries...................... $ 588 $ (82) $1 224
Dividends from subsidiaries:
Banks............................................................ 285 725 276
Other............................................................ 420 593 60
------ ------ ------
Total equity in earnings of subsidiaries (a).......................... 1 293 1 236 1 560
Interest from subsidiaries............................................ 616 423 312
Other interest revenue................................................ 46 27 18
Investment banking revenue allocations from subsidiaries.............. 71 59 74
Service fees from subsidiaries........................................ 134 87 27
Net investment securities gains (losses).............................. (28) (29) 4
Other revenue (includes gains of $24 in 1993 from the early
extinguishment of notes advanced to a subsidiary bank)........... 3 17 28
------ ------ ------
Total revenue......................................................... 2 135 1 820 2 023
------ ------ ------
EXPENSES
Interest (includes $24 in 1995, $16 in 1994, and $6 in 1993
to subsidiaries)................................................. 665 446 307
Employee compensation and benefits.................................... 159 103 72
Other expenses........................................................ 75 56 33
------ ------ ------
Total expenses........................................................ 899 605 412
------ ------ ------
Income before income taxes............................................ 1 236 1 215 1 611
Income tax expense (benefit).......................................... (60) - 25
------ ------ ------
NET INCOME............................................................ 1 296 1 215 1 586
------ ------ ------

(a) The 1993 amount includes the $137 million cost representing the cumulative
effect of the change in method of accounting for postretirement benefits.

Certain prior-year amounts have been reclassified to conform with 1995
classifications.

EX-13 78th Page of 116 TOC 1st Previous Next Bottom Just 78th

BALANCE SHEET

J.P. Morgan (parent)

· Enlarge/Download Table

December 31
-----------------
In millions 1995 1994
------- -------

ASSETS
Interest-earning deposits with subsidiary banks............................... $ 377 $ 1 640
Debt investment securities available for sale carried at fair value........... 688 1 116
Investments in subsidiaries:
Banks.................................................................... 8 985 7 978
U.S. broker-dealer....................................................... 407 486
Other nonbanks........................................................... 947 985
Advances to subsidiaries:
Banks.................................................................... 1 878 1 810
U.S. broker-dealer....................................................... 2 148 3 309
Other, primarily securities-related...................................... 5 154 1 531
Accrued interest and accounts receivable, primarily from subsidiary banks..... 265 221
Other assets (includes $908 in 1995 and $488 in 1994 related to
corporate-owned life insurance contracts, $544 in 1995 and $26 in 1994
related to deferred tax assets, and $50 in 1995 and $150 in 1994
from dividends receivable from subsidiary banks)......................... 1 660 774
------- -------
Total assets.................................................................. 22 509 19 850
------- -------
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase with subsidiary banks.......... 102 592
Commercial paper.............................................................. 2 729 3 430
Other liabilities for borrowed money.......................................... 1 140 -
Accounts payable and accrued expenses......................................... 1 255 933
Long-term debt not qualifying as risk-based capital........................... 3 369 2 266
Other liabilities............................................................. 71 51
------- -------
8 666 7 272
Long-term debt qualifying as risk-based capital............................... 3 392 3 010
------- -------
Total liabilities............................................................. 12 058 10 282
------- -------
Total stockholders' equity.................................................... 10 451 9 568
------- -------
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity.................................... 22 509 19 850
------- -------

EX-13 79th Page of 116 TOC 1st Previous Next Bottom Just 79th

STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS

J.P. Morgan (parent)

· Enlarge/Download Table

In millions 1995 1994 1993
------- ------- -------

NET INCOME................................................................... $ 1 296 $ 1 215 $ 1 586
Adjustments to reconcile to cash provided by operating activities:
Equity in undistributed (earnings) losses of subsidiaries............... (588) 82 (1 224)
Increase (decrease) due to changes in other
balance sheet amounts................................................... (223) 359 148
Net investment securities (gains) losses included in cash flows
from investing activities............................................... 28 29 (4)
Other revenue from the early redemption of advances
to subsidiaries......................................................... - - (24)
------- ------- -------
CASH PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES........................................ 513 1 685 482
------- ------- -------
(Increase) decrease in interest-earning deposits
with subsidiary banks................................................... 1 263 (1 452) 111
Debt investment securities:
Proceeds from sales..................................................... 5 720 535 203
Purchases............................................................... (5 230) (1 064) (882)
Increase in advances to subsidiaries......................................... (2 479) (695) (9)
Capital to subsidiaries...................................................... (250) (270) (17)
Payments for insurance contracts............................................. (367) (367) (180)
Other changes, net........................................................... (14) 36 24
------- ------- -------
CASH (USED IN) INVESTING ACTIVITIES.......................................... (1 357) (3 277) (750)
------- ------- -------
Increase (decrease) in securities sold under agreements
to repurchase with subsidiary banks..................................... (490) 281 311
Increase (decrease) in commercial paper...................................... (698) 991 (10)
Other liabilities for borrowed money proceeds................................ 1 140 - -
Long-term debt:
Proceeds................................................................ 2 230 1 575 741
Payments................................................................ (833) (464) (594)
Capital stock:
Issued or distributed................................................... 143 61 166
Purchased............................................................... (293) (445) (132)
Dividends paid............................................................... (583) (541) (480)
Cash receipts from subsidiary banks for common stock issuable................ 171 108 251
Other changes, net........................................................... 57 26 15
------- ------- -------
CASH PROVIDED BY FINANCING ACTIVITIES........................................ 844 1 592 268
------- ------- -------
INCREASE IN CASH AND DUE FROM BANKS.......................................... - - -
Cash and due from banks, beginning of year................................... 2 2 2
------- ------- -------
Cash and due from banks, end of year......................................... 2 2 2
------- ------- -------
Cash disbursements for interest and taxes.................................... $ 617 $ 445 $ 318
------- ------- -------

EX-13 80th Page of 116 TOC 1st Previous Next Bottom Just 80th

25. CERTAIN RESTRICTIONS: SUBSIDIARIES

Under the Federal Reserve Act and New York State law, there are legal
restrictions limiting the amount of dividends that Morgan Guaranty, a state
member bank, can declare. The most restrictive test requires approval of the
Federal Reserve Board if dividends declared exceed the net profits for that year
combined with the net profits for the preceding two years. The calculation of
the amount available for payment of dividends is based on net profits determined
in accordance with bank regulatory accounting principles, reduced by the amount
of dividends declared. At December 31, 1995, the cumulative retained net profits
for the years 1995 and 1994 available for distribution as dividends in 1996
without approval of the Federal Reserve Board amounted to approximately $1,235
million.

The Federal Reserve Board may prohibit the payment of dividends if it
determines that circumstances relating to the financial condition of a bank are
such that the payment of dividends would be an unsafe and unsound practice.
Delaware banking law also places certain limitations on the amount of dividends
that J.P. Morgan Delaware, a Delaware state bank, can pay.

U.S. federal law also places certain restrictions on certain types of
transactions engaged in by insured banks and their subsidiaries with certain
affiliates, including, in the case of Morgan Guaranty and J.P. Morgan Delaware,
J.P. Morgan and its nonbanking subsidiaries. "Covered transactions" are limited
to 20% of capital and surplus, as defined, and "covered transactions" with any
one such affiliate are limited to 10% of capital and surplus. "Covered
transactions" are defined to include, among other things, loans and extensions
of credit to such an affiliate, purchases of assets from such an affiliate, and
any guarantees, acceptances, and letters of credit issued on behalf of such an
affiliate. Such loans, extensions of credit, guarantees, acceptances, and
letters of credit must be collateralized. In addition, a wide variety of
transactions engaged in by insured banks and their subsidiaries with such
affiliates are required to be made on terms and under circumstances that are at
least as favorable to the bank or subsidiary concerned as those prevailing at
the time for comparable transactions with nonaffiliated companies.

Certain other subsidiaries are subject to various restrictions, mainly
regulatory requirements, that may limit cash dividends and advances to J.P.
Morgan and that establish minimum capital requirements.

EX-13 81st Page of 116 TOC 1st Previous Next Bottom Just 81st

ADDITIONAL SELECTED DATA
J.P. Morgan & Co. Incorporated

· Enlarge/Download Table

Dollars in millions, except per share data 1995 1994 1993 1992 1991
------------------------------------------ -------- -------- -------- -------- --------

SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
Total interest revenue....................... $ 9 937 $ 8 379 $ 7 442 $ 7 281 $ 7 786
Total noninterest revenue.................... 3 901 3 536 4 499 2 950 2 528
Total revenues............................... 13 838 11 915 11 941 10 231 10 314
Net interest revenue......................... 2 003 1 981 1 772 1 708 1 484
Provision for credit losses.................. - - - 55 40
Total operating expenses..................... 3 998 3 692 3 580 2 854 2 487
Net income................................... 1 296 1 215 1 586 (a) 1 582 (b) 1 146 (c)
At year-end:
Total assets............................ 184 879 154 917 133 888 103 197 103 468
Long-term debt (d)...................... 9 327 6 802 5 276 5 443 5 395
Stockholders' equity.................... 10 451 9 568 9 859 7 308 6 068
Common stockholders' equity............. 9 957 9 074 9 365 6 814 5 574
Tier 1 risk-based capital (l)........... 9 033 8 265 7 773 6 625 5 470
Total risk-based capital (l)............ 13 398 12 221 10 850 9 672 8 437
Per common share:
Net income (e).......................... $ 6.42 $ 6.02 $ 7.80 (a) $ 7.95 (b) $ 5.80 (c)
Book value.............................. 50.71 (f) 46.73 (g) 47.25 (h) 35.56 29.41
Dividends declared...................... 3.06 2.79 2.48 2.23 1/2 2.03
EARNINGS RATIOS
Net income as % of:
Average total assets.................... 0.73%(f) 0.70%(g) 1.08%(h) (i) 1.32%(j) 1.05%(k)
Average stockholders' equity............ 13.2 (f) 12.5 (g) 19.8 (h) (i) 22.5 (j) 20.4 (k)
Average common stockholders' equity..... 13.6 (f) 12.9 (g) 20.9 (h) (i) 23.9 (j) 21.9 (k)
DIVIDEND PAYOUT RATIO
Dividends declared per common share as % of
net income per common share............. 47.7% 46.3% 31.8%(i) 28.1%(j) 35.0%(k)
CAPITAL RATIOS
Average stockholders' equity as % of average
total assets............................ 5.5%(f) 5.7%(g) 5.5%(h) 5.8% 5.2%
Common stockholders' equity as % of:
Average total assets.................... 5.6 (f) 5.3 (g) 6.4 (h) 5.7 5.1
Total year-end assets................... 5.4 (f) 5.9 (g) 7.0 (h) 6.6 5.4
Total stockholders' equity as % of:
Average total assets.................... 5.9 (f) 5.5 (g) 6.7 (h) 6.1 5.6
Total year-end assets................... 5.7 (f) 6.2 (g) 7.4 (h) 7.1 5.9
Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio (l).......... 8.8 9.6 9.3 8.9 6.9
Total risk-based capital ratio (l)........... 13.0 14.2 13.0 13.0 10.7
Leverage ratio (l)........................... 6.1 6.5 7.3 7.1 5.8
OTHER SELECTED DATA
Registered holders of record of common stock
at year-end............................. 29 391 29 596 28 919 28 061 26 741
Common shares outstanding at year-end
(in thousands).......................... 187 116 187 701 193 087 191 610 189 529
Employees at year-end:
In the U.S.............................. 8 855 9 607 8 983 8 567 8 080
Outside the U.S......................... 6 758 7 448 6 210 5 801 5 243
------- ------- ------- ------- -------
Total................................... 15 613 17 055 15 193 14 368 13 323
------- ------- ------- ------- -------

EX-13 82nd Page of 116 TOC 1st Previous Next Bottom Just 82nd

(a) Net income in 1993 includes a $137 million ($0.68 per share) charge
related to the cumulative effect of a change in accounting for
postretirement benefits adopted January 1, 1993.

(b) Net income in 1992 includes $452 million ($2.29 per share) related to
the cumulative effect of a change in accounting for income taxes
adopted retroactive to January 1, 1992. As a result of applying the new
method of accounting for income taxes, income before the cumulative
effect of the change for 1992 was reduced by $252 million, or $1.26 per
share ($1.27 per share assuming full dilution); net income was
increased by $200 million, or $1.03 per share ($1.02 per share assuming
full dilution).

(c) Net income in 1991 includes $32 million ($0.17 per share) related to
the extraordinary gain on early retirement of debt.

(d) Includes $3,590 million, $3,197 million, $2,459 million, $2,300
million, and $2,080 million of long-term debt qualifying as risk-based
capital in 1995, 1994, 1993, 1992, and 1991 respectively.

(e) Earnings per share amounts for 1994 and 1993 represent both primary and
fully diluted earnings per share; earnings per share amounts for 1995,
1992 and 1991 represent primary earnings per share. For 1995 fully
diluted earnings per share were $6.36. For 1992 fully diluted earnings
per share before and after the cumulative effect of the change in
accounting were $5.63 and $7.92 respectively. For 1991 fully diluted
earnings per share before and after the extraordinary gain were $5.58
and $5.75 respectively.

(f) Excluding the effect of SFAS No. 115, the book value per common share
would have been $47.83 for the twelve months ended December 31, 1995;
net income would have been 0.73% of average total assets, 13.78% of
average stockholders' equity, and 14.3% of average common stockholders'
equity; average stockholders' equity would have been 5.3% of average
total assets; common stockholders' equity would have been 5.29% of
average total assets and 5.11% of total year-end assets; and total
stockholders' equity would have been 5.57% of average total assets and
5.37% of total year-end assets.

(g) Excluding the effect of SFAS No. 115, the book value per common share
would have been $44.39 for the twelve months ended December 31, 1994;
net income would have been 0.71% of average total assets, 13.6% of
average stockholders' equity, and 14.2% of average common stockholders'
equity; average stockholders' equity would have been 5.2% of average
total assets; common stockholders' equity would have been 5.0% of
average total assets and 5.6% of total year-end assets; and total
stockholders' equity would have been 5.3% of average total assets and
5.9% of total year-end assets.

(h) Excluding the effect of adopting SFAS No. 115 at December 31, 1993, the
book value per common share would have been $41.37; net income would
have been 1.09% of average total assets, 19.8% of average stockholders'
equity, and 20.9% of average common stockholders' equity; average
stockholders' equity would have been 5.5% of average total assets;
common stockholders' equity would have been 5.6% of average total
assets and 6.2% of total year-end assets; and total stockholders'
equity would have been 6.0% of average total assets and 6.6% of total
year-end assets.

(i) Excluding the cumulative effect of the accounting change for
postretirement benefits, 1993 net income would have been 1.18% of
average total assets, 21.1% of average stockholders' equity, and 22.3%
of average common stockholders' equity; dividends declared per common
share would have been 29.3% of income per common share before the
accounting change.

(j) Excluding the cumulative effect of the accounting change for income
taxes, 1992 net income would have been 0.94% of average total assets,
17.2% of average stockholders' equity, and 18.3% of average common
stockholders' equity; dividends declared per common share would have
been 39.5% of income per common share before the accounting change.

(k) Excluding the effect of the extraordinary gain on early retirement of
debt, 1991 net income would have been 1.03% of average total assets,
19.8% of average stockholders' equity, and 21.3% of average common
stockholders' equity; dividends declared per common share would have
been 36.1% of income per common share before the extraordinary gain.

(l) In accordance with Federal Reserve Board guidelines, the effect of SFAS
No. 115 and the equity, assets, and off-balance-sheet exposures of J.P.
Morgan Securities Inc. are excluded.

EX-13 83rd Page of 116 TOC 1st Previous Next Bottom Just 83rd

CONSOLIDATED AVERAGE BALANCES AND TAXABLE-EQUIVALENT NET INTEREST EARNINGS
J.P. Morgan & Co. Incorporated

· Enlarge/Download Table

Dollars in millions 1995 1994 1993
----------------------------- ---------------------------- -------------------------- ---------------------------
Interest and average rates on Average Average Average Average Average Average
a taxable-equivalent basis balance Interest rate balance Interest rate balance Interest rate
----------------------------- ------- -------- ------- ------- -------- ------- ------- -------- -------

ASSETS
Interest-earning deposits
with banks, mainly in
offices outside the U.S................... $ 1 796 $ 168 9.35% $ 2 252 $ 197 8.75% $ 2 636 $ 235 8.92%
Debt investment securities
in offices in the U.S.:(a)
U.S. Treasury........................ 1 983 130 6.56 1 282 79 6.16 2 541 117 4.60
U.S. state and
political subdivision............... 1 964 236 12.02 2 215 267 12.05 2 185 276 12.63
Other................................ 13 619 962 7.06 10 569 547 5.18 8 811 448 5.08
Debt investment securities
in offices outside the U.S.(a)........... 4 433 309 6.97 6 010 409 6.81 9 257 696 7.52
Trading account assets:
In offices in the U.S................ 12 802 836 6.53 14 632 952 6.51 13 534 755 5.58
In offices outside the
U.S................................. 25 560 2 205 8.63 24 033 1 838 7.65 16 985 1 240 7.30
Securities purchased under agreements to
resell and federal funds sold,
mainly in offices in the U.S......... 31 769 1 942 6.11 32 247 1 593 4.94 29 869 1 408 4.71
Securities borrowed in offices in the U.S. 15 222 876 5.75 15 615 624 4.00 14 076 408 2.90
Loans:
In offices in the U.S................ 6 586 479 7.27 7 754 438 5.65 8 295 447 5.39
In offices outside the U.S........... 17 561 1 236 7.04 16 201 991 6.12 17 954 1 242 6.92
Other interest-earning assets:(b)
In offices in the U.S................ 1 185 252 * 913 269 * 594 199 *
In offices outside the U.S........... 1 635 412 * 646 295 * 165 109 *
-------- ------- ----- -------- ------- ----- -------- ------ ------
Total interest-earning assets............. 136 115 10 043 7.38 134 369 8 499 6.33 126 902 7 580 5.97
Allowance for credit losses............... (1 130) (1 143) (1 199)
Cash and due from banks................... 1 796 1 790 2 355
Other noninterest-earning assets(c)....... 41 729 37 565 18 122
-------- ------- ----- -------- ------- ----- -------- ------ ------
Total assets.............................. 178 510 172 581 146 180
-------- ------- ----- -------- ------- ----- -------- ------ ------

The percentage of average interest-earning assets attributable to offices
outside the U.S. was 50% in 1995, 48% in 1994, and 46% in 1993.

Average balances are derived from daily balances except in the case of some
subsidiaries, which are derived from month-end balances. Interest and
average rates applying to the following asset categories have been adjusted
to a taxable-equivalent basis: Debt investment securities in offices in the
U.S., Trading account assets in offices in the U.S., and Loans in offices in
the U.S. The applicable tax rate used to adjust tax-exempt interest to a
taxable-equivalent basis was approximately 41% in 1995, 1994, and 1993.
Impaired loans are included in the determination of average total loans.
(a) For the twelve months ended December 31, 1995 and 1994, average debt
investment securities are computed based on historical amortized cost,
excluding the effects of SFAS No. 115 adjustments.
(b) Interest revenue includes the effect of certain off-balance-sheet
transactions.
(c) For the twelve months ended December 31, 1995 and 1994, Other noninterest-
earning assets include the effects of FIN No. 39 and SFAS No. 115.
* Not meaningful

EX-13 84th Page of 116 TOC 1st Previous Next Bottom Just 84th
· Enlarge/Download Table

Dollars in millions 1995 1994 1993
----------------------------- ---------------------------- -------------------------- ---------------------------

Interest and average rates on Average Average Average Average Average Average
a taxable-equivalent basis balance Interest rate balance Interest rate balance Interest rate
----------------------------- ------- -------- ------- ------- -------- ------- ------- -------- -------

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Interest-bearing deposits:
In offices in the U.S................ $ 2 048 $ 98 4.79% $ 2 175 $ 101 4.64% $ 2 487 $ 126 5.07%
In offices outside the U.S........... 41 762 2 422 5.80 37 768 1 845 4.89 31 906 1 793 5.62
Trading account liabilities:
In offices in the U.S................ 6 596 438 6.64 8 028 510 6.35 8 203 433 5.28
In offices outside the U.S........... 12 222 923 7.55 11 109 778 7.00 7 052 483 6.85
Securities sold under agreements to
repurchase and federal funds
purchased, mainly in offices
in the U.S........................... 43 658 2 568 5.88 48 372 2 196 4.54 49 322 2 055 4.17

Commercial paper, mainly in offices
in the U.S........................... 2 809 169 6.02 4 174 182 4.36 3 412 109 3.19
Other interest-bearing liabilities:
In offices in the U.S................ 10 414 639 6.14 8 085 365 4.51 8 260 287 3.47
In offices outside the U.S........... 1 869 127 6.80 2 315 132 5.70 2 908 156 5.36
Long-term debt, mainly in offices
in the U.S........................... 8 761 550 6.28 5 901 289 4.90 5 420 228 4.21
-------- -------- ------- ------- ------ ------ ------- ------ -----

Total interest-bearing liabilities........ 130 139 7 934 6.10 127 927 6 398 5.00 118 970 5 670 4.77
Noninterest-bearing deposits:
In offices in the U.S................ 3 336 3 818 4 671
In offices outside the U.S........... 1 354 1 395 1 265
Other noninterest-bearing liabilities(a).. 33 822 29 684 13 264
-------- ------ -------

Total liabilities......................... 168 651 162 824 138 170
Stockholders' equity...................... 9 859 9 757 8 010
------- ------- -------
Total liabilities and stockholders'
equity............................... 178 510 172 581 146 180
Net yield on interest-earning assets:..... 1.55 1.56 1.51
Attributable to offices in the
U.S.(b).............................. 1.29 1.41 1.22
Attributable to offices outside the
U.S.(b).............................. 1.85 1.73 1.84
Taxable-equivalent net interest earnings:. 2 109 2 101 1 910
Attributable to offices in the
U.S.(b).............................. 883 994 845
Attributable to offices outside the
U.S.(b).............................. 1 226 1 107 1 065
------- ----- -----

The percentage of average interest-bearing liabilities attributable to
offices outside the U.S. was 53% in 1995, 51% in 1994, and 44% in 1993.
(a) For the twelve months ended December 31, 1995 and 1994, Other noninterest-
bearing liabilities include the effects of FIN No. 39.
(b) Funding costs are allocated based on the location of the office recording
the asset. No allocation is made for capital.

EX-13 85th Page of 116 TOC 1st Previous Next Bottom Just 85th

ANALYSIS OF YEAR-TO- YEAR CHANGES IN TAXABLE-EQUIVALENT NET INTEREST EARNINGS
J.P. Morgan & Co. Incorporated

· Enlarge/Download Table

1995/94 1994/93
Increase (decrease) Increase (decrease)
due to change in: due to change in:
------------------- -----------------
Average Average Increase Average Average Increase
In millions balance rate (decrease) balance rate (decrease)
----------- ------- ------- -------- ------- ------- --------

INTEREST-EARNING ASSETS
Interest-earning deposits with banks,
mainly in offices outside the U.S............. $ (42) $ 13 $ (29) $ (34) $ (4) $ (38)
Debt investment securities
in offices in the U.S.:
U.S. Treasury................................. 46 5 51 (70) 32 (38)
U.S. state and political subdivision.......... (30) (1) (31) 4 (13) (9)
Other.......................................... 184 231 415 90 9 99
Debt investment securities
in offices outside the U.S.................... (109) 9 (100) (226) (61) (287)
Trading account assets:
In offices in the U.S......................... (119) 3 (116) 66 131 197
In offices outside the U.S.................... 122 245 367 536 62 598
Securities purchased under agreements to
resell and federal funds sold, mainly in
offices in the U.S............................ (24) 373 349 115 70 185
Securities borrowed in offices in the U.S...... (16) 268 252 48 168 216
Loans:
In offices in the U.S......................... (72) 113 41 (30) 21 (9)
In offices outside the U.S.................... 88 157 245 (115) (136) (251)
Other interest-earning assets:
In offices in the U.S......................... 69 (86) (17) 96 (26) 70
In offices outside the U.S.................... 295 (178) 117 229 (43) 186
------ ------ ------ ----- ----- -----
Total interest-earning assets.................. 392 1 152 1 544 709 210 919
------ ------ ------ ----- ----- -----
INTEREST-BEARING LIABILITIES
Interest-bearing deposits:
In offices in the U.S......................... (6) 3 (3) (15) (10) (25)
In offices outside the U.S.................... 209 368 577 303 (251) 52
Trading account liabilities:
In offices in the U.S......................... (94) 22 (72) (9) 86 77
In offices outside the U.S.................... 81 64 145 284 11 295
Securities sold under agreements to
repurchase and federal funds purchased,
mainly in offices in the U.S.................. (229) 601 372 (40) 181 141
Commercial paper, mainly in offices
in the U.S.................................... (70) 57 (13) 28 45 73
Other interest-bearing liabilities:
In offices in the U.S......................... 121 153 274 (6) 84 78
In offices outside the U.S.................... (28) 23 (5) (33) 9 (24)
Long-term debt, mainly in offices
in the U.S.................................... 175 86 261 27 34 61
------ ------ ------ ----- ----- -----
Total interest-bearing liabilities............. 159 1 377 1 536 539 189 728
------ ------ ------ ----- ----- -----
CHANGE IN TAXABLE-EQUIVALENT NET INTEREST EARNINGS 233 (225) 8 170 21 191
------ ------ ------ ----- ----- -----

Changes in the average balance/rate are allocated based on the percentage
relationship of the change in average balance or average rate to the total
increase (decrease). Included in the above analysis is approximately $38
million, $39 million, and $167 million of interest revenue recorded in 1995,
1994, and 1993 respectively that related to prior years.

TAXABLE-EQUIVALENT NET INTEREST EARNINGS AND THE STATEMENT OF INCOME
J.P. Morgan & Co. Incorporated

· Enlarge/Download Table

In millions 1995 1994 1993
----------- ------- ------ ------

Taxable interest revenue.................................................. $ 9 728 $8 154 $7 178
Tax-exempt interest revenue, adjusted to a taxable-equivalent basis....... 315 345 402
------- ------ ------
Total interest revenue, adjusted to a taxable-equivalent basis............ 10 043 8 499 7 580
Less: interest expense.................................................... 7 934 6 398 5 670
------- ------ ------
Taxable-equivalent net interest earnings.................................. 2 109 2 101 1 910
Less: adjustment of tax-exempt interest revenue........................... 106 120 138
------- ------ ------
Net interest revenue, as in the statement of income....................... 2 003 1 981 1 772
------- ------ ------

EX-13 86th Page of 116 TOC 1st Previous Next Bottom Just 86th

ASSET-QUALITY ANALYSIS

LOANS
J.P. Morgan's portfolio of loans is diversified by borrower, industry, and
geographic area. On the basis of the location of the borrower or, in the case of
guaranteed loans, the location of the guarantor, at December 31, 1995, 45% of
loans were in the United States, compared with 49% at December 31, 1994. No more
than 12% of loans were in any single foreign country at both 1995 and 1994 year-
ends. At December 31, 1995 and 1994, 12% and 11% respectively of loans were
collateralized by marketable securities or cash. At December 31, 1995 and 1994,
after exclusion of these collateralized amounts, there was no category of
borrower or guarantor that accounted for 10% or more of total loans.

The following table shows loan diversity based upon maturity and interest
rate structure, by category and location of the booking office.

· Enlarge/Download Table

Maturing
--------
After one After five
Within year but years but After
In millions: December 31, 1995 one year within five within ten ten years Total
------------------------------ -------- ----------- ---------- --------- -----

LOANS IN OFFICES IN THE U.S.
Commercial and industrial............. $ 940 $ 480 $ 421 $ 149 $ 1 990
Financial institution:
Banks............................ 575 154 - - 729
Other financial institutions..... 344 181 1 1 527
Collateralized by real estate......... 43 92 71 159 365
Other, including U.S. state and
political subdivision............ 1 272 162 176 56 1 666
------- ------- ------- ------- -------
3 174 1 069 669 365 5 277
------- ------- ------- ------- -------
LOANS IN OFFICES OUTSIDE THE U.S.
Commercial and industrial............. 3 681 4 583 1 677 104 10 045
Financial institution:
Banks............................ 911 519 17 - 1 447
Other financial institutions..... 1 881 860 152 120 3 013
Collateralized by real estate......... 106 110 27 38 281
Foreign governments and official
institutions..................... 569 422 21 30 1 042
Other................................. 1 105 1 189 53 1 2 348
------- ------- ------- ------- -------
8 253 7 683 1 947 293 18 176
------- ------- ------- ------- -------
11 427 8 752 2 616 658 23 453
------- ------- ------- ------- -------
LOANS AT FIXED RATES OF INTEREST
Offices in the U.S.................... 1 124 759 473 149 2 505
Offices outside the U.S............... 1 752 969 50 36 2 807
------- ------- ------- ------- -------
2 876 1 728 523 185 5 312
------- ------- ------- ------- -------
LOANS AT FLOATING RATES OF INTEREST
Offices in the U.S.................... 2 050 310 196 216 2 772
Offices outside the U.S............... 6 501 6 714 1 897 257 15 369
------- ------- ------- ------- -------
8 551 7 024 2 093 473 18 141
------- ------- ------- ------- -------
11 427 8 752 2 616 658 23 453
------- ------- ------- ------- -------

EX-13 87th Page of 116 TOC 1st Previous Next Bottom Just 87th

Additional detail on loans by category and location at December 31 is
presented in the following table.

· Enlarge/Download Table

In millions 1995 1994 1993 1992 1991
----------- ------- ------- ------- ------- -------

LOANS IN OFFICES IN THE U.S.
Commercial and industrial.................... $ 1 990 $ 3 047 $ 3 507 $ 3 643 $ 2 476
Financial institution:
Banks................................... 729 458 730 258 369
Other financial institutions............ 527 738 1 457 1 089 1 794
Collateralized by real estate................ 365 365 411 457 412
Other, including U.S. state and
political subdivision................... 1 666 1 483 1 928 2 802 2 540
------- ------- ------- ------- -------
5 277 6 091 8 033 8 249 7 591
------- ------- ------- ------- -------
LOANS IN OFFICES OUTSIDE THE U.S.

			in		Show		and
Help...	Wildcards: ? (any letter), * (many). *Logic:* for Docs: & (and), \| (or); for Text: \| (anywhere), "(&)" (near).

Morgan J P & Co Inc · 10-K · For 12/31/95 · EX-13

Filed On 3/25/96 · SEC File 1-05885 · Accession Number 68100-96-424

Annual Report · Form 10-KFiling Table of Contents

EX-13 · Annual ReportExhibit Table of Contents

Annual Report · Form 10-K
Filing Table of Contents

EX-13 · Annual Report
Exhibit Table of Contents