Document/ExhibitDescriptionPagesSize 1: 10-Q Quarterly Report HTML 2.94M
2: EX-12.1 Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges HTML 49K
3: EX-31.1 Certification -- §302 - SOA'02 HTML 39K
4: EX-31.2 Certification -- §302 - SOA'02 HTML 39K
5: EX-32.1 Certification -- §906 - SOA'02 HTML 35K
6: EX-32.2 Certification -- §906 - SOA'02 HTML 35K
13: R1 Document and Entity Information HTML 52K
14: R2 Consolidated Balance Sheets (Unaudited) HTML 129K
15: R3 Consolidated Balance Sheets (Unaudited) HTML 67K
(Parenthetical)
16: R4 Consolidated Statements of Income (Unaudited) HTML 144K
17: R5 Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income HTML 54K
(Unaudited)
18: R6 Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity HTML 84K
(Unaudited)
19: R7 Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited) HTML 172K
20: R8 Business and Summary of Significant Accounting HTML 110K
Policies
21: R9 Discontinued Operations HTML 237K
22: R10 Loans HTML 768K
23: R11 Allowance For Loan Losses HTML 158K
24: R12 Investment Securities HTML 407K
25: R13 Borrowings HTML 174K
26: R14 Derivative Financial Instruments HTML 253K
27: R15 Fair Value HTML 505K
28: R16 Stockholders' Equity HTML 192K
29: R17 Regulatory Capital HTML 98K
30: R18 Income Taxes HTML 50K
31: R19 Commitments HTML 92K
32: R20 Contingencies HTML 55K
33: R21 Certain Relationships and Related Transactions HTML 41K
34: R22 Business Segment Information HTML 217K
35: R23 Goodwill HTML 45K
36: R24 Subsequent Events HTML 37K
37: R25 Business and Summary of Significant Accounting HTML 127K
Policies (Policies)
38: R26 Business and Summary of Significant Accounting HTML 89K
Policies (Tables)
39: R27 Discontinued Operations (Tables) HTML 237K
40: R28 Loans (Tables) HTML 750K
41: R29 Allowance For Loan Losses (Tables) HTML 157K
42: R30 Investment Securities (Tables) HTML 521K
43: R31 Borrowings (Tables) HTML 159K
44: R32 Derivative Financial Instruments (Tables) HTML 294K
45: R33 Fair Value (Tables) HTML 464K
46: R34 Stockholders' Equity (Tables) HTML 183K
47: R35 Regulatory Capital (Tables) HTML 92K
48: R36 Commitments (Tables) HTML 70K
49: R37 Business Segment Information (Tables) HTML 217K
50: R38 Goodwill (Tables) HTML 45K
51: R39 Business and Summary of Significant Accounting HTML 57K
Policies (Narrative) (Details)
52: R40 Discontinued Operations (Schedule of Condensed HTML 78K
Balance Sheet Aerospace Discontinued Operations)
(Details)
53: R41 Discontinued Operations (Narrative) (Details) HTML 94K
54: R42 Discontinued Operations (Schedule of Condensed HTML 94K
Statements of Income and Cash Flow of Aerospace
Discontinued Operations) (Details)
55: R43 Discontinued Operations (Schedule of Condensed HTML 78K
Balance Sheet Financial Freedom Discontinued
Operations) (Details)
56: R44 Discontinued Operations (Schedule of Condensed HTML 96K
Statements of Income and Cash Flow of Financial
Freedom Discontinued Operations) (Details)
57: R45 Discontinued Operations (Schedule of Condensed HTML 66K
Combined Balance Sheet of Discontinued Operations)
(Details)
58: R46 Discontinued Operations (Schedule of Condensed HTML 82K
Combined Statements of Income and Cash Flow of
Discontinued Operations) (Details)
59: R47 Loans (Schedule of Finance Receivables by Product) HTML 50K
(Details)
60: R48 Loans (Schedule of Finance Receivables by Segment, HTML 51K
Based on Obligor Location) (Details)
61: R49 Loans (Components of Net Investment in Finance HTML 40K
Receivables) (Details)
62: R50 Loans (Finance and Held-For-Sale Receivables - By HTML 128K
Risk Rating) (Details)
63: R51 Loans (Narrative) (Details) HTML 126K
64: R52 Loans (Schedule of Consumer Loan LTV HTML 126K
Distributions) (Details)
65: R53 Loans (Finance and Held For Sale Receivables - HTML 139K
Delinquency Status) (Details)
66: R54 Loans (Finance Receivables on Non-accrual Status) HTML 85K
(Details)
67: R55 Loans (Schedule of Loans In Process of HTML 47K
Foreclosure) (Details)
68: R56 Loans (Impaired Loans) (Details) HTML 92K
69: R57 Loans (Purchased Credit Impaired Loans with HTML 60K
Deteriorated Credit Quality) (Details)
70: R58 Loans (Summary of Commercial PCI Loans by Credit HTML 51K
Quality) (Details)
71: R59 Loans (Schedule of Changes to the Accretable Yield HTML 46K
for PCI Loans) (Details)
72: R60 Loans (Estimated Future Advances to Reverse HTML 58K
Mortgages) (Details)
73: R61 Allowance For Loan Losses (Schedule of Allowance HTML 113K
for Loan Losses and Recorded Investment in Finance
Receivables) (Details)
74: R62 Investment Securities (Schedule of Investment HTML 61K
Securities) (Details)
75: R63 Investment Securities (Narrative) (Details) HTML 51K
76: R64 Investment Securities (Schedule of Interest and HTML 45K
Dividend Income) (Details)
77: R65 Investment Securities (Amortized Cost and Fair HTML 103K
Value of AFS and HTM Securities) (Details)
78: R66 Investment Securities (Schedule of Amortized Cost HTML 149K
and Fair Value Maturities with Changes Recorded in
Net Income) (Details)
79: R67 Investment Securities (Schedule of AFS and HTM - HTML 96K
Estimated Unrealized Losses) (Details)
80: R68 Investment Securities (Changes in Accretable Yield HTML 53K
for Purchased Credit-Impaired Securities)
(Details)
81: R69 Investment Securities (Schedule of Securities HTML 48K
Carried at Fair Value with Changes Recorded in Net
Income) (Details)
82: R70 Investment Securities (Amortized Cost and Fair HTML 56K
Value of Debt Securities Held-To-Maturity by
Contractual Maturity Dates) (Details)
83: R71 Borrowings (Schedule of Long-Term Borrowings) HTML 53K
(Details)
84: R72 Borrowings (Narrative) (Details) HTML 204K
85: R73 Borrowings (Schedule of Senior Unsecured Notes) HTML 59K
(Details)
86: R74 Borrowings (Schedule of FHLB Advances with Pledged HTML 39K
Assets) (Details)
87: R75 Borrowings (Schedule of Structured Financings and HTML 62K
Pledged Assets) (Details)
88: R76 Borrowings (Assets and Liabilities in HTML 57K
Unconsolidated VIEs) (Details)
89: R77 Derivative Financial Instruments (Fair and HTML 79K
Notional Values of Derivative Financial
Instruments) (Details)
90: R78 Derivative Financial Instruments (Narrative) HTML 55K
(Details)
91: R79 Derivative Financial Instruments (Offsetting of HTML 57K
Derivative Assets) (Details)
92: R80 Derivative Financial Instruments (Offsetting of HTML 57K
Derivative Liabilities) (Details)
93: R81 Derivative Financial Instruments (Derivative HTML 58K
Instrument Gains and Losses) (Details)
94: R82 Derivative Financial Instruments (Changes in AOCI HTML 53K
Relating to Derivatives) (Details)
95: R83 Fair Value (Assets and Liabilities Measured at HTML 86K
Fair Value on a Recurring Basis) (Details)
96: R84 Fair Value (Narrative) (Details) HTML 116K
97: R85 Fair Value (Quantitative Information about Level 3 HTML 90K
Fair Value Measurements-Recurring) (Details)
98: R86 Fair Value (Changes in Estimated Fair Value for HTML 93K
Financial Assets and Liabilities Measured on
Recurring Basis) (Details)
99: R87 Fair Value (Carrying Value of Assets Measured at HTML 68K
Fair Value on a Non-Recurring Basis) (Details)
100: R88 Fair Value (Carrying and Estimated Fair Values of HTML 121K
Financial Instruments) (Details)
101: R89 Stockholder's Equity (Schedule of Common Stock HTML 57K
Activity) (Details)
102: R90 Stockholders' Equity (Narrative) (Details) HTML 78K
103: R91 Stockholders' Equity (Components of Accumulated HTML 50K
Other Comprehensive Loss) (Details)
104: R92 Stockholders' Equity (Changes in Accumulated Other HTML 63K
Comprehensive Income (Loss) by Component)
(Details)
105: R93 Stockholders' Equity (Reclassifications out of HTML 63K
Accumulated Other Comprehensive (Income) Loss)
(Details)
106: R94 Regulatory Capital (Tier 1 Capital and Total HTML 72K
Capital Components) (Details)
107: R95 Income Taxes (Narrative) (Details) HTML 91K
108: R96 Commitments (Summary of Commitments) (Details) HTML 66K
109: R97 Commitments (Narrative) (Details) HTML 80K
110: R98 Contingencies (Narrative) (Details) HTML 64K
111: R99 Certain Relationships and Related Transactions HTML 52K
(Narrative) (Details)
112: R100 Business Segment Information (Segment Pre-Tax HTML 123K
Income (Loss)) (Details)
113: R101 Goodwill (Schedule of Goodwill) (Details) HTML 47K
114: R102 Goodwill (Narrative) (Details) HTML 38K
115: R103 Subsequent Events (Details) HTML 41K
117: XML IDEA XML File -- Filing Summary XML 232K
116: EXCEL IDEA Workbook of Financial Reports XLSX 198K
7: EX-101.INS XBRL Instance -- cit-20170930 XML 11.26M
9: EX-101.CAL XBRL Calculations -- cit-20170930_cal XML 445K
10: EX-101.DEF XBRL Definitions -- cit-20170930_def XML 2.02M
11: EX-101.LAB XBRL Labels -- cit-20170930_lab XML 3.27M
12: EX-101.PRE XBRL Presentations -- cit-20170930_pre XML 2.38M
8: EX-101.SCH XBRL Schema -- cit-20170930 XSD 334K
118: ZIP XBRL Zipped Folder -- 0001628280-17-010885-xbrl Zip 669K
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes |X| No |_|
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes |X| No |_|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller
reporting company or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of ‘large accelerated filer,’ ‘accelerated filer’, ‘smaller reporting company’ and ‘emerging growth company’ in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check One): Large accelerated filer |X| Accelerated filer |_| Non-accelerated filer |_| (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) Smaller reporting company |_| Emerging growth company |_|
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. |_|
Indicate by check mark whether the
registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes |_| No |X|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed all documents and reports required to be filed by Sections 12, 13, or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 subsequent to the distribution of securities under a plan confirmed by a court. Yes |_| No |_|
Cash
and due from banks, including restricted balances of $60.8 and $176.1 at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016(1), respectively (see Note 6 for amounts pledged)
$
453.4
$
822.1
Interest bearing deposits, including restricted balances of $90.1 and $102.8 at September
30, 2017 and December 31, 2016(1), respectively (see Note 6 for amounts pledged)
2,658.9
5,608.5
Investment securities, including securities carried at fair value with changes recorded in net income of $247.7 and $283.5 at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively (see Note 6 for amounts pledged)
5,744.8
4,491.1
Assets
held for sale(1)
2,162.0
636.0
Loans (see Note 6 for amounts pledged)
28,505.3
29,535.9
Allowance
for loan losses
(419.5
)
(432.6
)
Total loans, net of allowance for loan losses(1)
28,085.8
29,103.3
Operating
lease equipment, net (see Note 6 for amounts pledged)(1)
The
following table presents information on assets and liabilities related to Variable Interest Entities (VIEs) that are consolidated by the Company. The difference between VIE total assets and total liabilities represents the Company’s interests in those entities, which were eliminated in consolidation. The assets of the consolidated VIEs will be used to settle the liabilities of those entities and, except for the Company’s interest in the VIEs, are not available to the creditors of CIT or any affiliates of CIT.
Assets
Cash
and interest bearing deposits, restricted
$
88.3
$
99.9
Total loans, net of allowance for loan losses
146.8
300.5
Operating
lease equipment, net
759.9
775.8
Assets of discontinued operations
—
2,321.7
Total Assets
$
995.0
$
3,497.9
Liabilities
Beneficial
interests issued by consolidated VIEs (classified as long-term borrowings)
$
603.9
$
770.0
Liabilities of discontinued operations
—
1,204.6
Total
Liabilities
$
603.9
$
1,974.6
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash flows from operations:
Provision
for credit losses
84.2
173.6
Net depreciation, amortization and (accretion)
291.8
603.0
Net gains on asset sales and impairments on
assets held for sale and other
(255.8
)
(68.8
)
Loss on debt extinguishment
256.6
—
Provision for deferred income taxes
0.6
136.4
Decrease
in finance receivables held for sale
43.4
168.1
Goodwill and intangible assets - impairment
—
4.2
Net (payment) reimbursement of
expense from FDIC
(4.6
)
3.1
Decrease in other assets
145.7
52.2
(Decrease) increase in other liabilities
(729.4
)
72.9
Net
cash flows provided by operations
388.7
1,439.2
Cash Flows From Investing Activities
Changes in loans, net
916.3
520.9
Purchases
of investment securities
(4,447.7
)
(3,347.3
)
Proceeds from sales and maturities of investment securities
3,180.7
2,835.8
Proceeds from asset
and receivable sales
795.5
1,094.9
Proceeds from sale of commercial air
10,026.0
—
Purchases of assets to be leased and other equipment
(660.2
)
(1,420.2
)
Net
decrease in short-term factoring receivables
(308.8
)
(288.1
)
Purchases of restricted stock
(17.5
)
—
Proceeds from redemption of restricted stock
9.1
9.8
Payments
to the FDIC under loss share agreements
(0.2
)
(2.2
)
Proceeds from the FDIC under loss share agreements and participation agreements
56.5
83.9
Proceeds
from sale of OREO, net of repurchases
82.7
103.3
Purchase of bank owned life insurance
(650.0
)
—
Net change in restricted cash
662.8
(22.4
)
Net
cash flows provided by (used in) investing activities
9,645.2
(431.6
)
Cash Flows From Financing Activities
Proceeds from the issuance of term debt
18.1
10.1
Repayments
of term debt and net settlements
(8,308.9
)
(1,332.2
)
Proceeds from FHLB advances
1,650.0
1,645.5
Repayments of FHLB debt
(915.4
)
(2,324.9
)
Net
(decrease) increase in deposits
(2,707.3
)
91.5
Collection of security deposits and maintenance funds
64.2
260.3
Use of security deposits
and maintenance funds
(35.6
)
(118.2
)
Repurchase of common stock
(3,425.5
)
—
Net proceeds from issuance of preferred stock
318.0
—
Dividends
paid
(82.4
)
(92.3
)
Taxes paid through withholding of common stock under employee stock plans
(20.6
)
(20.6
)
Payments on affordable housing investment
credits
(17.5
)
(8.4
)
Net cash flows used in financing activities
(13,462.9
)
(1,889.2
)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
15.2
(2.3
)
Decrease
in unrestricted cash and cash equivalents
(3,413.8
)
(883.9
)
Unrestricted cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period
6,375.2
7,470.6
Unrestricted
cash and cash equivalents, end of period
$
2,961.4
$
6,586.7
Supplementary Cash Flow Disclosure
Interest
paid
$
(776.1
)
$
(915.9
)
Federal, foreign, state and local income taxes (paid) refunded, net
$
(38.0
)
$
49.9
Supplementary
Non Cash Flow Disclosure
Transfer of assets from held for investment to held for sale
$
2,074.6
$
2,020.5
Transfer
of assets from held for sale to held for investment
$
122.6
$
91.0
Deposits on flight equipment purchases applied to acquisition of flight equipment purchases, and origination of finance leases, capitalized interest, and buyer furnished equipment
$
91.2
$
210.4
Transfers
of assets from held for investment to OREO
$
85.3
$
71.6
Capital lease unexercised bargain purchase options
$
17.5
$
7.1
Unfunded
payments on affordable housing investment credits committed during the period
$
60.1
$
—
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
CIT GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES – NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
NOTE 1 — BUSINESS AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
CIT Group Inc., together with its subsidiaries (collectively “we”,
“our”, “CIT” or the “Company”), has provided financial solutions to its clients since 1908. The Company provides financing, leasing and advisory services principally to middle market companies in a wide variety of industries primarily in North America. CIT is a bank holding company (“BHC”) and a financial holding company (“FHC”). Through its bank subsidiary, CIT Bank, N.A., doing business as OneWest Bank, CIT provides a full range of commercial and consumer banking and related services to customers through 70 branches located in Southern California and its online bank, bankoncit.com.
CIT is regulated by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (“FRB”) and the Federal Reserve Bank of New York (“FRBNY”)
under the U.S. Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended. CIT Bank, N.A. is regulated by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency of the U.S. Department of the Treasury (“OCC”).
BASIS OF PRESENTATION
Basis of Financial Information
These consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the instructions to Form 10-Q for interim financial information and accordingly do not include all information and note disclosures required by generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America (“GAAP”) for complete financial statements. The financial statements in this Form 10-Q, in the opinion of management, include all adjustments, consisting only of
normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair statement of CIT’s financial position, results of operations and cash flows in accordance with GAAP. These consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016.
The accounting and financial reporting policies of CIT Group Inc. conform to GAAP and the preparation of the consolidated financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect reported amounts and disclosures. Actual results could differ from those estimates and assumptions. Some of the more significant estimates include: allowance for loan losses, loan impairment, fair value determination, lease residual values, liabilities for uncertain tax positions, realizability of deferred tax assets, purchase accounting adjustments,
indemnification assets, goodwill, intangible assets, and contingent liabilities, including amounts associated with the discontinued operation. Additionally where applicable, the policies conform to accounting and reporting guidelines prescribed by bank regulatory authorities.
Principles of Consolidation
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include financial information related to CIT Group Inc. and its majority-owned subsidiaries and those variable interest entities (“VIEs”) where the Company is the primary beneficiary.
In preparing the consolidated financial statements, all significant inter-company
accounts and transactions have been eliminated. Assets held in an agency or fiduciary capacity are not included in the consolidated financial statements.
The current period’s results of operations do not necessarily indicate the results that may be expected for any other interim period or for the full year as a whole.
Discontinued Operations
Discontinued Operations as of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 included certain assets and liabilities of the Financial Freedom business that was acquired as part of the OneWest Transaction and the Business Air
business, while December 31, 2016 also included certain assets and liabilities of the Commercial Air business. Income from discontinued operations reflects the activities of the Aerospace (Commercial Air and Business Air) and Financial Freedom businesses for the quarters ended September 30, 2017 and 2016. We completed the sale of our Commercial Air business in April 2017.
On October 6, 2017, CIT announced that CIT Bank, N.A. has agreed to sell Financial Freedom, its reverse mortgage servicing business and the reverse mortgage portfolio serviced by Financial Freedom (the “Financial Freedom
Transaction”). The Financial Freedom Transaction is expected to close in the second quarter of 2018 and is subject to certain regulatory and investor approvals and other customary closing conditions. See further discussions in Note 2 — Discontinued Operations and Note 17 - Subsequent Events.
CIT GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
– NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
Bank-Owned Life Insurance
During the third quarter of 2017, CIT Bank purchased life insurance policies on the lives of certain officers and employees and is the owner and beneficiary of the policies. CIT Bank purchased these policies, known as bank-owned life insurance ("BOLI"), to provide an efficient method to offset the cost of providing employee benefits. CIT Bank records these BOLI policies as a separate line item in the Consolidated Balance Sheets at each policy’s respective cash surrender value, with changes recorded in other non-interest income in the Consolidated Statements of Income.
Revisions of Previously
Issued Statements of Cash Flows
The Company has revised the Statement of Cash Flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 in connection with immaterial errors impacting the classification of certain balances between line items and categories as previously disclosed in its Form 10-K, Note 29 - Selected Quarterly Financial Data, for the year ended December 31, 2016, in addition to immaterial errors identified during 2017. The misclassifications resulted in an overstatement of net cash flows provided by operations of $62.8 million
(which included an understatement of the 'increase in other assets' line item of $120.9 million and an understatement of the 'increase in accrued liabilities and payables' line item for the same amount for the prior year errors identified in 2017), an overstatement of net cash flows used in investing activities of $76.3 million, and an understatement of net cash flows used in financing activities of $4.8 million. The revision also resulted in a negative impact of $8.7 million disclosed as a separate line item within the Statement of Cash Flows reflecting the cumulative effect of exchange rate changes. The Company evaluated the impact of the errors and has concluded that individually and in the aggregate,
the errors were not material to any previously issued financial statements.
SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Significant accounting policies are included with the current Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016. There were no material changes to these policies during the nine months ended September 30, 2017.
Newly Adopted Accounting Standards
The following pronouncements were issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) and adopted by CIT
as of January 1, 2017. Refer to Note 1 - Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2017 for a detailed description of these pronouncements:
•
Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2016-05, Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Effect of Derivative Contract Novations on Existing Hedge Accounting Relationships.
•
ASU
2016-06, Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Contingent Put and Call Options in Debt Instruments.
•
ASU 2016-07, Investments-Equity Method and Joint Ventures (Topic 323): Simplifying the Transition to the Equity Method of Accounting.
CIT GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES – NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
Standard
Summary of Guidance
Effect on CIT's Financial Statements
ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts
with Customers (Topic 606), and subsequent related ASUs
Issued May 2014, with Updates through May 2016
•
Establishes the principles to apply in determining the amount and timing of revenue recognition.
•
The guidance specifies the accounting for certain costs related to revenue, and requires additional disclosures about the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenues and related cash flows.
•
The core principle is that a company will recognize revenue when it transfers control of goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration
to which it expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services.
•
May be adopted using a full retrospective approach or a modified, cumulative effect approach (cumulative initial effect recognized at the date of adoption, with additional footnote disclosures).
The review and analysis of CIT’s individual revenue streams is substantially complete. “Interest Income” and “Rental Income on Operating Leases”, CIT’s two largest revenue items, are out of scope of the new guidance; as are many other revenues relating to financial
assets and liabilities, including loans, leases, securities and derivatives. As such, the majority of our revenues will not be impacted; however, certain ancillary revenues and components of “Other income” are being assessed at a contractual level pursuant to the new standard. There are no material changes to the related accounting policies.
•
CIT does not anticipate a significant impact on our financial statements and disclosures. Disclosure enhancements are expected to be more qualitative in nature.
•
Our evaluations are not final and we continue to assess the impact of the Update on our revenue contracts.
•
CIT
plans to adopt the standard using the modified retrospective method.
ASU 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842)
Issued February 2016
•
Lessees will need to recognize all leases longer than twelve months on the consolidated balance sheets as lease liabilities with corresponding right-of-use assets. For income statement purposes, the FASB retained a dual model, requiring leases to be classified as either operating or finance. Classification will be based on criteria that are largely similar to those applied in current lease accounting, but without explicit thresholds.
•
Lessor
accounting remains similar to the current model, but updated to align with certain changes to the lessee model (e.g., certain definitions, such as initial direct costs, have been updated) and the new revenue recognition standard. Lease classifications by lessors are similar, operating, direct financing, or sales-type.
•
The ASU requires both quantitative and qualitative disclosures regarding key information about leasing arrangements. The new standard must be adopted using a modified retrospective transition, and provides for certain practical expedients. Transition will require application of the new guidance at the beginning of the earliest comparative period presented. Early adoption is permitted.
CIT will need to determine the impact where it is both a lessee and a lessor:
◦
Lessor accounting: CIT is analyzing the impact of changes to the definition of ‘initial direct costs’ under the new guidance. The new standard has a narrower definition of initial direct costs, which will result in CIT recognizing increased upfront expenses offset by higher yield over the lease term. CIT is currently evaluating the bifurcation of certain non-lease components from lease revenue streams. If goods or services are determined to be a non-lease component and accounted for under ASC 606 or other applicable GAAP guidance, the income recognition may differ from current accounting.
CIT expects that it will bifurcate certain maintenance components relating to our railcar business.
◦
Lessee accounting: CIT is continuing to evaluate the impact of the amended guidance on its Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. CIT expects to recognize right-of-use assets and lease liabilities for substantially all of its operating lease commitments based on the present value of unpaid lease payments as of the date of adoption.
•
CIT management has assembled a project committee to assess the impact of this guidance. Initial scoping and assessment is complete and CIT is continuing to evaluate the impact on its financial statements and disclosures.
CIT GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES – NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
Standard
Summary
of Guidance
Effect on CIT's Financial Statements
ASU 2016-13, Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments
Issued June 2016
•
Introduces a forward-looking “expected loss” model (the “Current Expected Credit Losses” (“CECL”) model) to estimate credit losses to cover the full remaining expected life of the portfolio upon adoption, rather than the incurred loss model under current U.S. GAAP, on certain types of financial instruments.
•
It
eliminates existing guidance for purchase credit impaired (“PCI”) loans, and requires recognition of an allowance for expected credit losses on financial assets purchased with more than insignificant credit deterioration since origination.
•
It amends existing impairment guidance for Available for Sale (“AFS”) securities to incorporate an allowance, which will allow for reversals of impairment losses in the event that the credit of an issuer improves.
•
In addition, it expands the disclosure requirements regarding an entity’s assumptions, models, and methods for estimating the allowance for loan and lease losses ("ALLL").
•
Entities will apply the standard’s provisions as a cumulative-effect
adjustment to retained earnings as of the beginning of the first reporting period in which the guidance is adopted (modified-retrospective approach).
While CIT is currently in the process of evaluating the impact of the amended guidance on its Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, it currently expects the ALLL to increase upon adoption given that the allowance will be required to cover the full remaining expected life of the portfolio upon adoption, rather than the incurred loss model under current U.S. GAAP. The extent of this increase is still being evaluated and will depend on economic conditions and the composition of
CIT’s loan and lease portfolios at adoption date.
ASU 2016-01, Financial Instruments-Overall (Subtopic 825-10): Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities
Issued June 2016
•
Includes amendments on recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosure of financial instruments.
•
Adds a new Topic (ASC 321, Investments - Equity Securities) to the FASB Accounting Standards Codification, which provides guidance on accounting for equity investments.
•
The
amendments related to equity securities without readily determinable fair values (including disclosure requirements) should be applied prospectively to equity investments that exist as of the date of adoption of the Update.
•
Requires adoption by applying a cumulative-effect adjustment to the balance sheet as of the beginning of the fiscal year of adoption.
CIT is currently evaluating the impact of this new guidance on the Consolidated Financial Statements.
•
CIT’s
implementation efforts include the identification of securities within the scope of the guidance and the related impact to accounting policies, presentation, and disclosures.
•
CIT does not expect the adoption of this guidance to have a material impact on its Consolidated Financial Statements.
CIT
GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES – NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
Standard
Summary of Guidance
Effect on CIT's Financial Statements
ASU 2016-16, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Intra-Entity Transfers of Assets Other Than Inventory
Issued October 2016
•
Requires
that the Company recognize the tax expense from the sale of the asset in the seller’s tax jurisdiction when the transfer occurs, and any deferred tax asset that arises in the buyer’s jurisdiction would also be recognized at the time of the transfer even though the pre-tax effects of the transaction are eliminated in consolidation.
•
The modified retrospective approach will be required for transition to the new guidance, with a cumulative-effect adjustment recorded in retained earnings as of the beginning of the period of adoption.
CIT
is currently evaluating the impact of this new guidance on the Consolidated Financial Statements.
ASU 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments
Issued August 2016
•
Clarifies how entities should classify certain cash receipts and cash payments on the statement of cash flows. The new guidance also clarifies how the predominance principle should be applied when cash receipts and cash payments have aspects of more than one class of cash flows.
•
Requires
retrospective application to all periods presented.
CIT's evaluation of the ASU is substantially complete. CIT does not expect the adoption of this guidance to have a material impact on its Consolidated Financial Statements.
ASU 2016-18, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230):Restricted Cash
Issued November 2016
•
Requires
that the Statement of cash flows explain the change during the period in the total of cash, cash equivalents, and amounts generally described as restricted cash or restricted cash equivalents.
•
Requires adoption using a retrospective transition method for each period presented.
CIT's evaluation of the ASU is substantially complete. CIT does not expect the adoption of this guidance to have a material impact on its Consolidated Financial Statements.
ASU 2017-01, Business
Combinations (Topic 805): Clarifying the Definition of a Business
Issued January 2017
•
This guidance narrows the definition of a business. This standard provides guidance to assist entities with evaluating when a set of transferred assets and activities is a business.
•
This guidance must be applied prospectively to transactions occurring within the period of adoption.
•
Early adoption is permitted. This guidance must be applied prospectively to transactions occurring within the period of adoption.
CIT is currently evaluating the impact of this ASU, but does not expect the adoption of this guidance to have a material impact on its Consolidated Financial Statements.
ASU 2017-05, Other Income-Gains and Losses from the Derecognition of Nonfinancial Assets (Subtopic 610-20)
Issued February 2017
• This guidance clarifies the scope of
accounting for derecognition or partial
sale of nonfinancial assets to exclude
all
businesses and non-profit
activities.
• ASU 2017-05 also provides a
definition for in substance nonfinancial
assets and additional guidance on partial sales of nonfinancial assets.
CIT GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES – NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
Standard
Summary
of Guidance
Effect on CIT's Financial Statements
ASU 2017-07, Compensation-Retirement Benefits (Topic 715): Improving the Presentation of Net Periodic Pension Cost and Net Periodic Postretirement Benefit Cost
Issued March 2017
•
Requires employers that present a measure of operating income in their statement of income to include only the service cost component of net periodic pension cost and net periodic postretirement benefit cost in operating expenses (together with other employee compensation costs).
•
The
other components of net benefit cost, including amortization of prior service cost/credit, and settlement and curtailment effects, are to be included in non-operating expenses in a separate line item(s).
•
Stipulates that only the service cost component of net benefit cost is eligible for capitalization.
•
Early adoption is permitted. The amendments related to presentation of service cost and other components in the income statements must be applied retrospectively to all periods presented. The amendments related to the capitalization of the service cost component should be applied prospectively, on and after the date of adoption.
CIT is currently evaluating the impact of this ASU on its financial statements and disclosures.
ASU 2017-08, Receivables-Nonrefundable Fees and Other Costs (Subtopic 310-20): Premium Amortization on Purchased Callable Debt Securities
Issued March 2017
•
ASU 2017-08 shortens the amortization period for certain callable debt securities held at a premium. Specifically, the amendments require the premium to be amortized to the earliest
call date.
•
The new guidance applies to all entities that hold investments in callable debt securities for which the amortized cost basis exceeds the amount repayable by the issuer at the earliest call date (i.e., at a premium).
•
This guidance must be adopted on a modified retrospective basis through a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings.
CIT is currently evaluating the impact of this ASU on its financial statements and disclosures and
does not intend to early adopt this standard.
ASU 2017-09, Compensation-Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Scope of Modification Accounting
Issued May 2017
•
The amendments in this Update provide guidance about which changes to the terms or conditions of a share-based payment award require an entity to apply modification accounting.
•
This guidance must be adopted prospectively to an award modified on or after the adoption date.
CIT GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
– NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
Standard
Summary of Guidance
Effect on CIT's Financial Statements
ASU 2017-12 Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Targeted Improvements to Accounting for Hedging Activities
Issued August 2017
•
The purpose of this Update is to better
align a company’s financial reporting for hedging activities with the economic objectives of those activities and to simplify the application of the hedge accounting model. Among other things, ASU 2017-12: (a) expands the types of transactions eligible for hedge accounting; (b) eliminates the separate measurement and presentation of hedge ineffectiveness; (c) simplifies the requirements around the assessment of hedge effectiveness; (d) provides companies more time to finalize hedge documentation; and (e) enhances presentation and disclosure requirements.
•
Requires a modified retrospective transition method in which the Company will recognize the cumulative effect of the change on the opening balance of each affected component of equity in the statement of financial position as of the date of
adoption.
Early adoption is permitted in any interim or annual period; as a result CIT currently intends to adopt prior to the effective date.
•
While CIT continues to assess all potential impacts of the standard, preliminary assessment indicates that adoption may not have a material impact on its Consolidated Financial Statements.
CIT GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES – NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
NOTE 2 — DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
Aerospace
As
discussed in Note 2 — Acquisitions and Discontinued Operations in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016, the activity associated with the Commercial Air and Business Air businesses were included in discontinued operations. The Commercial Air business was sold on April 4, 2017.
The following condensed financial information reflects the Business Air business as of September 30, 2017 and a combination of the Commercial Air and Business Air businesses as of December 31, 2016.
Condensed
Balance Sheet — Aerospace (dollars in millions)
Amount includes deposits on commercial aerospace equipment of $1,013.7 million at December 31,
2016.
(2)
Amount includes commercial aerospace maintenance reserves of $1,084.9 million and security deposits of $167.0 million at December 31, 2016.
Commercial Air was sold on April 4, 2017. The purchase price was $10.4 billion, and we recorded a pre-tax gain of $146 million,
which is included in the Condensed Statement of Income below for the nine months ended September 30, 2017.
Condensed Statement of Income — Aerospace (dollars in millions)
Income
from discontinued operations before provision for income taxes
2.8
87.3
169.6
264.9
Provision for income taxes
(0.3
)
(20.1
)
(71.0
)
(12.5
)
Gain
(loss) on sale of discontinued operations, net of taxes
(1.3
)
—
118.6
—
Income from discontinued operations, net of taxes
$
1.2
$
67.2
$
217.2
$
252.4
(1)
Depreciation
on operating lease equipment is suspended when an operating lease asset is placed in Assets Held for Sale.
(2)
Operating expenses include salaries and benefits and other operating expenses in the prior quarters. Operating expenses for the nine months ended September 30, 2017, included costs related to the commercial air separation initiative.
(3)
The
Company repaid approximately $1 billion of secured borrowings in the first quarter of 2017 within discontinued operations and recorded a loss of $39 million in relation to the extinguishment of those borrowings.
Condensed Statement of Cash Flows — Aerospace (dollars in millions)
CIT
GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES – NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
Reverse Mortgage Servicing
The Financial Freedom business, a division of CIT Bank that services reverse mortgage loans, was acquired in conjunction with the OneWest Transaction. Pursuant to ASC 205-20, the Financial Freedom business is reflected as discontinued operations. Assets include primarily Home Equity Conversion Mortgages (“HECMs”) and servicing advances. The liabilities include reverse mortgage servicing liabilities, which relates primarily to loans serviced for third party investors, secured borrowings and contingent liabilities. Continuing operations includes a separate portfolio
of reverse mortgage loans of $862 million and other real estate owned assets of $25 million at September 30, 2017, which are recorded in the Consumer Banking segment (refer to Note 3-Loans) and are serviced by Financial Freedom. On October 6, 2017, CIT entered into a definitive agreement to sell the Financial Freedom business and the reverse mortgage loan portfolio serviced by Financial Freedom. The Financial Freedom Transaction is expected to close in the second quarter of 2018 and is subject to certain regulatory and investor approvals and other customary closing conditions. See Note 17 - Subsequent Events.
As a mortgage servicer of residential
reverse mortgage loans, the Company is exposed to contingent liabilities for breaches of servicer obligations as set forth in industry regulations established by the Department of Housing and Urban Development (“HUD”) and the Federal Housing Administration (“FHA”) and in servicing agreements with the applicable counterparties, such as third party investors. Under these agreements, the servicer may be liable for failure to perform its servicing obligations, which could include fees imposed for failure to comply with foreclosure timeframe requirements established by servicing guides and agreements to which CIT is a party as the servicer of the loans. The Company had established reserves for contingent servicing-related liabilities associated with discontinued operations.
During
the nine months ended September 30, 2017, the Company and the FDIC resolved the selling and servicing-related obligations for certain reverse mortgage loans with Fannie Mae. In connection with the settlement, the Company released the FDIC from its indemnification obligation to CIT with respect to the Fannie Mae serviced loans, which reduced the indemnification receivable by $77 million. As of September 30, 2017, the indemnification receivable from the FDIC was $29 million for covered servicing-related obligations related
to reverse mortgage loans pursuant to the loss share agreement between CIT Bank and the FDIC related to the acquisition by OneWest Bank from the FDIC of certain assets of IndyMac Federal Bank FSB ("IndyMac") (the "IndyMac Transaction"). See the Company's Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016, Note 5 - Indemnification Assets, for further information.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2017, income from Financial Freedom was driven by a net release of the curtailment reserve of $111 million, partially offset by an increase of $40 million in other servicing-related reserves.
In addition, during the nine months ended September 30, 2017, the Company entered into a settlement of approximately $89 million with the HUD OIG and Department of Justice to resolve servicing related claims, which was within the Company’s existing reserves. Further, the Company recognized a write-down of its servicing operations of $54 million, of which $50 million related to impairment of its mortgage servicing rights, included in Other liabilities below.
Condensed
Balance Sheet — Financial Freedom (dollars in millions)
Total cash and deposits, all of which is restricted
$
6.5
$
5.8
Net
Loans(1)
299.2
374.0
Other assets(2)
41.0
68.3
Assets
of discontinued operations
$
346.7
$
448.1
Secured borrowings(1)
$
293.6
$
366.4
Other
liabilities(3)
260.8
569.4
Liabilities of discontinued operations
$
554.4
$
935.8
(1)
Net
loans include $292.7 million and $365.5 million of securitized balances at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively, and $6.5 million and $8.5 million of additional draws awaiting securitization respectively. Secured borrowings relate to those receivables.
(2)
Amount includes servicing advances, servicer receivables and property
and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation.
(3)
Other liabilities include $165.2 million and $518.2 million of contingent liabilities, $79.5 million and $28.8 million of reverse mortgage servicing liabilities and $16.1 million and $22.3 million of other accrued liabilities at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively.
Loss from discontinued operations before benefit for income taxes
(7.2
)
(48.4
)
(5.2
)
(291.2
)
Benefit
for income taxes(4)
2.8
18.5
2.0
90.1
Loss from discontinued operation, net of taxes
$
(4.4
)
$
(29.9
)
$
(3.2
)
$
(201.1
)
(1)
Includes
amortization for the premium associated with the HECM loans and related secured borrowings.
(2)
For the nine months ended September 30, 2017, other income included an impairment charge of approximately $50 million on the mortgage servicing rights. For the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2016, other income included an impairment charge of approximately $19 million on the mortgage servicing rights.
(3)
For
the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2017, operating expense is comprised of approximately $5 million and $14 million in salaries and benefits, $1 million and $9 million in professional and legal services, and $5 million and $9 million for other expenses such as data processing, premises and equipment, and miscellaneous charges. For the nine months ended September 30, 2017, operating expenses included a net release of the curtailment reserve of $111 million,
partially offset by an increase of $40 million in other servicing-related reserves. For the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2016, operating expense is comprised of approximately $5 million and $11 million in salaries and benefits, $7 million and $16 million in professional services and $3 million and $11 million for other expenses such as data processing, premises and equipment, legal settlement, and miscellaneous charges. In addition, in the nine months ended September 30,
2016, operating expenses included a net increase to the servicing-related reserve of approximately $230 million.
(4)
For the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2017, the Company's tax rate for discontinued operations was 39% and 38%, respectively. For the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2016,
the Company’s tax rate for discontinued operations was 38% and 31% respectively.
Condensed Statement of Cash Flows — Financial Freedom Discontinued Operations (dollars in millions)
CIT's Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 included $102 million of activity within the decrease in other liabilities related to the Company's net release of servicing-related reserves partially offset by the impairment charge to
the servicing liability, and $77 million of activity within the decrease in other assets related to the Company's release of the FDIC from its indemnification obligation to CIT with respect to the Fannie Mae serviced loans. For the nine months ended September 30, 2016, there was $230 million of activity within the increase in other liabilities related to the Company’s net increase in servicing-related reserves.
Combined Results for Discontinued Operations
The following tables reflect
the combined results of the discontinued operations. Details of the balances are discussed in prior tables.
Condensed Combined Balance Sheet Discontinued Operations (dollars in millions)
Loans
held for sale includes loans primarily related to portfolios in Commercial Banking, Consumer Banking and the China portfolio in NSP. As discussed in subsequent tables, since the Company manages the credit risk and collections of loans held for sale consistently with its loans held for investment, the aggregate amount is presented in this table.
The following table presents loans, excluding loans held for sale, by segment, based on obligor location:
The
Consumer Banking segment includes certain commercial loans, primarily consisting of a portfolio of Small Business Administration (SBA) loans. These loans are excluded from the Consumer loan balance and included in the Commercial loan balances in the tables throughout this note.
Accretable
yield on Purchased Credit-Impaired (“PCI”) loans
(1,116.9
)
(1,261.4
)
Net unamortized deferred costs and (fees)(1)
64.6
55.8
(1)
Balance
relates to the Commercial Banking segment.
Certain of the following tables present credit-related information at the “class” level in accordance with ASC 310-10-50, Disclosures about the Credit Quality of Finance Receivables and the Allowance for Credit Losses. A class is generally a disaggregation of a portfolio segment. In determining the classes, CIT considered the loan characteristics and methods it applies in monitoring and assessing credit risk and performance.
Credit Quality Information
Commercial obligor risk ratings are reviewed on a regular basis by Credit Risk Management and are adjusted as necessary for updated information
affecting the borrowers’ ability to fulfill their obligations.
The following table summarizes commercial loans by the risk ratings that bank regulatory agencies utilize to classify credit exposure and which are consistent with indicators the Company monitors. The consumer loan risk profiles are different from commercial loans, and use loan-to-value (“LTV”) ratios in rating the credit quality, and therefore are presented separately below.
Commercial
Loans and Held for Sale Loans — Risk Rating by Class / Segment (dollars in millions)
For
consumer loans, the Company monitors credit risk based on indicators such as delinquencies and LTV, which the Company believes are relevant credit quality indicators.
CIT GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
– NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
LTV refers to the ratio comparing the loan’s unpaid principal balance to the property’s collateral value. We examine LTV migration and stratify LTV into categories to monitor the risk in the loan classes.
The following table provides LTV distribution of the consumer portfolio. The amounts represent the carrying value, which differ from unpaid principal balances, and include the premiums or discounts and the accretable yield and non-accretable difference for PCI loans recorded in purchase accounting. Included in the consumer loans are “covered loans” for which the Company can be reimbursed for a substantial portion of future losses under the terms of loss sharing agreements
with the FDIC if losses occur within the indemnification period. As of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the carrying value of the indemnification asset for covered single family residential and reverse mortgage loans totaled $143 million and $233 million, respectively, under the IndyMac Transaction. No indemnification asset was recognized in connection with the First Federal or La Jolla Transactions. The indemnification asset is measured on the same basis of accounting as the covered loans (e.g., as PCI loans under the effective yield method). Covered loans are further discussed in our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2016, Note 5 — Indemnification Assets.
Covered loans are limited to the Consumer Banking, Legacy Consumer Mortgages ("LCM") division.
Included in the consumer loan balances as of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, were loans with terms that permitted negative amortization with an unpaid principal balance of $529 million and $761 million, respectively.
Certain
Consumer Loans do not have LTV’s, including the Credit Card portfolio.
(2)
The reverse mortgage loans transferred to AHFS are excluded in the table and have a total carrying value of $862.1 million, of which $412.4 million are covered.
Due
to their nature, reverse mortgage loans are included in Current, as they do not have contractual payments due at a specified time.
(2)
PCI loans are written down at acquisition to their fair value using an estimate of cash flows deemed to be collectible. Accordingly, such loans are no longer classified as past due or non-accrual even though they may be contractually past due as we expect to fully collect the new carrying values.
CIT GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES – NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
The following table sets forth non-accrual loans, assets received in satisfaction of loans (OREO and repossessed assets) and loans 90 days or more past due and still accruing.
Loans
on Non-Accrual Status (dollars in millions)(1)
Commercial
loans past due 90 days or more accruing
$
17.3
$
7.2
Consumer
loans past due 90 days or more accruing
18.1
24.8
Total
Accruing loans past due 90 days or more
$
35.4
$
32.0
(1)
Factored
receivables within our Business Capital division do not accrue interest and therefore are not considered within non-accrual loan balances; however factored receivables are considered for credit provisioning purposes.
Payments received on non-accrual financing receivables are generally applied first against outstanding principal, though in certain instances where the remaining recorded investment is deemed fully collectible, interest income is recognized on a cash basis. Reverse mortgages are not included in the non-accrual balances.
The table below summarizes the residential mortgage loans in the process of foreclosure and OREO:
Loans
in Process of Foreclosure (dollars in millions) (1)
As
of September 30, 2017, the table included $127.5 million of reverse mortgage loans in the process of foreclosure that were transferred from AHFI to AHFS and $25.2 million of reverse mortgage OREO.
Impaired Loans
The Company’s policy is to review for impairment loans greater than $500,000 that are on non-accrual status, as well as short-term factoring receivables greater than $500,000 when events or circumstances indicate that it is probable that CIT will
be unable to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the factoring agreement. Small-ticket loan and lease receivables that have not been modified in a restructuring are included (if appropriate) in the reported non-accrual balances above, but are excluded from the impaired loans disclosure below as charge-offs are typically determined and recorded for such loans when they are more than 90 – 150 days past due.
The following table contains information about impaired loans and the related allowance for loan losses by class, exclusive of loans that were identified as impaired at the date of the OneWest Transaction (the “Acquisition Date”) for which the Company is applying the income
recognition and disclosure guidance in ASC 310-30 (Loans and Debt Securities Acquired with Deteriorated Credit Quality), which are disclosed further below in this note. Impaired loans exclude PCI loans.
Interest
income recorded for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 while the loans were impaired was $1.7 million of which none was recognized using the cash-basis method of accounting. Interest income recorded for the year ended December 31, 2016 while the loans were impaired was $1.6 million, of which $0.6 million was interest recognized using the cash-basis method of accounting.
(2)
Details
of finance loans that were identified as impaired at the Acquisition Date are presented under Loans Acquired with Deteriorated Credit Quality.
The Company applied the income recognition and disclosure guidance in ASC 310-30 (Loans and Debt Securities Acquired with Deteriorated Credit Quality) to loans that were identified as impaired as of the Acquisition Date. PCI loans were initially recorded at estimated fair value with no allowance for loan losses carried over, since the initial fair values reflected credit losses expected to be incurred over the remaining lives of the loans. The acquired loans are subject to the Company’s internal credit review. See Note 4 — Allowance for Loan Losses.
The
following table summarizes the carrying value of commercial PCI loans within Commercial Banking, which are monitored for credit quality based on internal risk classifications. See previous table Consumer Loan LTV Distributions for credit quality metrics on consumer PCI loans.
Non-criticized
loans generally include loans that are expected to be repaid in accordance with contractual loan terms. Criticized loans are risk rated as special mention or classified.
Accretable Yield
The excess of cash flows expected to be collected over the recorded investment (estimated fair value at acquisition) of the PCI loans represents the accretable yield and is recognized in interest income on an effective yield basis over the remaining life of the loan, or pools of loans. The accretable yield is adjusted for changes in interest rate indices for variable rate PCI loans, changes in prepayment assumptions and changes in expected principal and interest payments and collateral values. Further, if a loan within a pool of loans is modified, the modified loan remains part of the pool of loans. The difference
between the cash flows contractually required to be paid, measured as of the Acquisition Date, over the expected cash flows is referred to as the non-accretable difference.
Subsequent to acquisition, we evaluate our estimates of the cash flows expected to be collected on a quarterly basis. Probable and significant decreases in expected cash flows as a result of further credit deterioration result in a charge to the provision for credit losses and a corresponding increase to the allowance for credit losses. Probable and significant increases in expected cash flows due to improved credit quality result in reversal of any previously recorded allowance for loan losses, to the extent applicable, and an increase in the accretable yield applied prospectively for any remaining increase. Changes in expected cash flows caused by changes in market interest rates or by prepayments are recognized
as adjustments to the accretable yield on a prospective basis.
When a loan is transferred to held for sale, PAA accretion on those transferred loans ceases upon transfer.
The Company periodically modifies the terms of loans in response to borrowers’ difficulties. Modifications that include a financial concession to the borrower are accounted for as troubled debt restructurings (TDRs). See the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016 for discussion of policies on TDRs.
At September 30, 2017, the
loans in trial modification period were $4.2 million under the Home Affordable Modification Program ("HAMP") and $8.6 million under proprietary programs. Trial modifications with a recorded investment of $11 million at September 30, 2017 were accruing loans and $1.8 million were non-accruing loans. At December 31, 2016, the loans in trial modification period were $36.4 million under HAMP, $0.1 million under the Second Lien Modification Program ("2MP") and $3.0 million
under proprietary programs. Trial modifications with a recorded investment of $38.1 million at December 31, 2016 were accruing loans and $1.4 million were non-accruing loans. Our experience is that substantially all of the mortgages that enter a trial payment period program are successful in completing the program requirements and are then permanently modified at the end of the trial period. Our allowance process considers the impact of those modifications that are probable to occur.
The recorded investment of TDRs, excluding those classified as PCI and those within a trial modification period discussed in the preceding paragraph, at September 30,
2017 and December 31, 2016 was $149.2 million and $82.3 million, of which 60% and 41%, respectively, were on non-accrual. See the preceding paragraph on discussion related to TDRs in trial modification period. Commercial Banking and Consumer Banking receivables accounted for 90% and 10% of the total TDRs, respectively, at September 30, 2017. Commercial Banking and Consumer Banking receivables accounted for 85.0% and 15.0%
of the total TDRs, respectively at December 31, 2016. There were $14.1 million and $5.4 million as of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively, of commitments to lend additional funds to borrowers whose loan terms have been modified in TDRs.
The recorded investment related to modifications qualifying as TDRs that occurred during the quarters ended September 30, 2017 and 2016
were $39.0 million and $39.4 million, and $129.7 million and $58.1 million for the nine month periods, respectively. The recorded investment as of September 30, 2017 and 2016 of TDRs that experience a payment default (payment default is one missed payment), during the quarters ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, and for which the payment default occurred within one
year of the modification totaled $7.5 million and $10.5 million, respectively, and $72.0 million and $12.6 million for the nine month periods, respectively. The defaults that occurred during the current quarter and year to date related to Commercial Banking and Consumer Banking.
The financial impact of the various modification strategies that the Company employs in response to borrower difficulties is described below. While the discussion focuses on the September 30, 2017
amounts, the overall nature and impact of modification programs were comparable in the prior year.
CIT GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES – NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
▪
The
nature of modifications qualifying as TDR’s based upon recorded investment at September 30, 2017 was comprised of payment deferrals for 41% and covenant relief and/or other for 59%. December 31, 2016 TDR recorded investment was comprised of payment deferrals for 12% and covenant relief and/or other for 88%.
▪
Payment deferrals result in lower net present value of cash
flows, if not accompanied by additional interest or fees, and increased provision for credit losses to the extent applicable. The financial impact of these modifications is not significant given the moderate length of deferral periods.
▪
Interest rate reductions result in lower amounts of interest being charged to the customer, but are a relatively small part of the Company’s restructuring programs. Additionally, in some instances, modifications improve the Company’s economic return through increased interest rates and fees, but are reported as TDRs due to assessments
regarding the borrowers’ ability to independently obtain similar funding in the market and assessments of the relationship between modified rates and terms and comparable market rates and terms. The weighted average change in interest rates for all TDRs occurring during the quarters ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 was not significant.
▪
Debt forgiveness, or the reduction in amount owed by borrower, results in incremental provision for credit losses, in the form of higher charge-offs. While these types of modifications have the greatest individual
impact on the allowance, the amounts of principal forgiveness for TDRs occurring during quarters ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 was not significant, as debt forgiveness is a relatively small component of the Company’s modification programs.
▪
The other elements of the Company’s modification programs that are not TDRs, do not have a significant impact on financial results given
their relative size, or do not have a direct financial impact, as in the case of covenant changes.
Reverse Mortgages
At September 30, 2017, reverse mortgages of $862.1 million were classified as assets held-for-sale within continuing operations related to the Financial Freedom Transaction, of which $728.7 million related to the uninsured proprietary reverse mortgage loans and the remaining related to FHA-insured HECM loans. At December 31, 2016, the reverse mortgages had an outstanding balance of $891.8 million,
of which $769.6 million related to the uninsured proprietary reverse mortgage loans.
The uninsured proprietary reverse mortgage portfolio consists of approximately 1,500 loans with an average borrowers’ age of 83 years old and an unpaid principal balance of $953.6 million at September 30, 2017. At December 31, 2016, the uninsured proprietary reverse mortgage portfolio consisted of approximately 1,700 loans with an average borrowers’ age of 83
years old and an unpaid principal balance at approximately $1.0 billion. The realizable collateral value (the lower of the collectible principal and interest or the estimated value of the home) exceeds the outstanding book balance at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016.
This
table does not take into consideration cash inflows including payments from mortgagors or payoffs based on contractual terms.
(2)
This table includes the reverse mortgages supported by the Company as a result of the IndyMac loss-share agreements with the FDIC. As of September 30, 2017, the Company is responsible for funding up to a remaining $65 million of the total amount.
CIT GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES – NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
Serviced Loans
As a result of the OneWest Transaction, the Company services Home Equity Conversion Mortgages
(“HECM”) reverse mortgage loans sold to Agencies (Fannie Mae) and securitized into GNMA HECM mortgage-backed securities (“HMBS”) pools. HECM loans transferred into the HMBS program have not met all the requirements for sale accounting, and therefore, the Company has accounted for these transfers as a financing transaction with the loans remaining on the Company’s statement of financial position and the proceeds received are recorded as a secured borrowing. The pledged loans and secured borrowings are reported in Assets of discontinued operations and Liabilities of discontinued operations, respectively. See Note 2 — Discontinued Operations.
In the quarter
ended September 30, 2017, the Company repurchased $33.6 million (unpaid principal balance) of additional HECM loans, all of which were classified as AHFS resulting from the transfer of all reverse mortgage loans to held-for-sale, in connection with the Financial Freedom Transaction. As of September 30, 2017, the Company had an outstanding balance of $133.4 million of HECM loans, with unpaid principal balance of $173.6 million classified as AHFS and accounted for at the lower
of cost or fair market value. As of December 31, 2016, the Company had an outstanding balance of $122.2 million of HECM loans, of which $32.8 million (unpaid principal balance) were classified as AHFS with a remaining purchase discount of $0.1 million, $68.1 million were classified as HFI accounted for as PCI loans with an associated remaining purchase discount of $9.1 million. Serviced loans also included $30.4 million that were classified as HFI, accounted for under the effective yield method and have no remaining
purchase discount.
NOTE 4 — ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES
The Company maintains an allowance for loan losses for estimated credit losses in its HFI loan portfolio. The allowance is adjusted through a provision for credit losses, which is charged against current period earnings, and reduced by any charge-offs for losses, net of recoveries.
The Company maintains a separate reserve for credit losses on off-balance sheet
commitments, which is reported in Other Liabilities. Off-balance sheet credit exposures include items such as unfunded loan commitments, issued standby letters of credit and deferred purchase agreements. The Company’s methodology for assessing the appropriateness of this reserve is similar to the allowance process for outstanding loans.
Allowance for Loan Losses and Recorded Investment in Loans (dollars in millions)
Loans
acquired with deteriorated credit quality(3)
121.1
2,299.3
2,420.4
Ending balance
$
22,780.9
$
7,116.1
$
29,897.0
Percentage
of loans to total loans
76.2
%
23.8
%
100
%
(1)
“Other reserves” represents additional credit loss reserves for unfunded lending commitments, letters of credit and for
deferred purchase agreements, all of which is recorded in Other liabilities. “Other” also includes changes relating to loans that were charged off and reimbursed by the FDIC under the indemnification provided by the FDIC, sales and foreign currency translations.
(2)
Gross charge-offs of amounts specifically reserved in prior periods that were charged directly to the Allowance for loan losses included $7.7 million and $39.3 million for the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2017, respectively, and $4.0
million and $27.0 million for the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2016, respectively. The charge-offs related to Commercial Banking for all periods. Gross charge-offs in Consumer Banking for the quarter and nine month ended September 30, 2017 included $19.7 million related to reverse mortgage loans transferred from AHFI to AHFS.
(3)
Represents loans considered impaired as part of the OneWest transaction
and are accounted for under the guidance in ASC 310-30 (Loans and Debt Securities Acquired with Deteriorated Credit Quality).
CIT GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES – NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
NOTE 5 — INVESTMENT SECURITIES
Investments include debt and equity securities. The Company’s debt securities include U.S. Government Agency securities, U.S. Treasury securities, residential mortgage-backed securities (“MBS”), and supranational securities. Equity securities include common stock and warrants, along with restricted stock in the Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) and FRB.
Securities carried at fair value with changes recorded in net income
Debt
securities
247.7
283.5
Non-marketable investments(2)
277.5
256.4
Total investment securities
$
5,744.8
$
4,491.1
(1)
Recorded
at amortized cost.
(2)
Non-marketable investments include restricted stock of the FRB and FHLB carried at cost of $245.7 million at September 30, 2017 and $239.7 million at December 31, 2016. The remaining non-marketable investments include ownership interests greater than 3% in limited partnership investments that are accounted for under the equity method, other investments carried at
cost, which include qualified Community Reinvestment Act (CRA) investments, equity fund holdings and shares issued by customers during loan work out situations or as part of an original loan investment, totaling $31.8 million and $16.7 million at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively.
Realized investment gains totaled $4.9 million and $5.1 million for the quarters ended September 30, 2017
and 2016, and $7.3 million and $6.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively, and exclude losses from OTTI.
In addition, the Company had $2.7 billion and $5.6 billion of interest bearing deposits at banks at September 30,
2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively, which are cash equivalents and are classified separately on the balance sheet.
The following table presents interest and dividends on interest bearing deposits and investments:
Interest and Dividend Income (dollars in
millions)
CIT GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES – NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
The following table summarizes the gross unrealized losses and estimated fair value of AFS securities and HTM securities aggregated by investment category and length of time that the securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position.
In connection with the OneWest acquisition, the Company classified AFS mortgage-backed securities as PCI due to evidence of credit deterioration since issuance and for which it is probable that the Company will not collect all principal and interest payments contractually required at the time of purchase. Accounting for these adjustments is discussed in Note 1 — Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2016.
CIT GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES – NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
Changes in the accretable yield for PCI securities are summarized below for the quarters
and nine months ended September 30, 2017 and September 30, 2016:
The
estimated fair value of PCI securities was $404.8 million and $478.9 million with a par value of $508.6 million and $615.2 million as of September 30, 2017, and December 31, 2016, respectively.
Securities
Carried at Fair Value with Changes Recorded in Net Income (dollars in millions)
The Company conducted and documented its periodic review of all securities with unrealized losses, which it performs to evaluate whether the impairment is other than temporary.
For PCI securities, management determined certain PCI securities with unrealized losses were deemed credit-related and recognized OTTI credit-related losses. There was $0.2 million OTTI credit-related losses recognized for the quarter ended September 30, 2017 and $0.1 million was recognized as permanent
write-downs for the quarter ended September 30, 2016, and $0.4 million and $2.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and September 30, 2016, respectively.
CIT
GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES – NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
The Company reviewed debt securities classified as AFS and HTM with unrealized losses and determined that the unrealized losses were not OTTI. The unrealized losses were not credit-related and the Company does not have an intent to sell and believes it is not more-likely-than-not that the Company will have to sell prior to the recovery of the amortized cost basis.
The
Company reviewed equity securities classified as AFS with unrealized losses and determined that the unrealized losses were not OTTI. The unrealized losses were not credit-related.
There were immaterial unrealized losses on non-marketable investments.
NOTE 6 — BORROWINGS
The following table presents the carrying value of outstanding borrowings.
The Revolving Credit Facility has a total commitment amount of $750 million and the maturity date of the commitment is January 25, 2019. The applicable margin charged under the facility is 2.00% for LIBOR Rate loans and 1.00% for Base Rate loans.
The Revolving Credit Facility was amended in February 2017 to lower the total commitments from $1.5 billion
to $1.4 billion and to further extend the final maturity date of the lenders’ commitments. On April 4, 2017, upon consummation of the Commercial Air Sale, the total commitment amount under the Revolving Credit Facility was reduced from $1.4 billion to $750 million and the covenant requiring that the Company maintain a minimum $6 billion consolidated net worth was replaced by a covenant requiring that the Company maintain a minimum Tier 1 capital ratio of 9.0%. Also upon the consummation
of the Commercial Air Sale, one of the nine domestic operating subsidiaries of the Company was discharged and released as a guarantor under the Revolving Credit Facility. As of September 30, 2017, the Revolving Credit Facility was unsecured and was guaranteed by eight of the Company’s domestic operating subsidiaries. In addition, the applicable required minimum guarantor asset coverage ratio ranged from 1.0:1.0
to 1.5:1.0 and was 1.25:1.0 at this date.
The Revolving Credit Facility may be drawn and prepaid at the option of CIT. The unutilized portion of any commitment under the Revolving Credit Facility may be reduced permanently or terminated by CIT at any time without penalty. There were no outstanding borrowings at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016. The amount available to draw upon at September 30, 2017 was approximately $675 million,
with the remaining amount of approximately $75 million being utilized for issuance of letters of credit to customers.
CIT GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES – NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
Senior
Unsecured Notes
The following table presents the principal amounts by maturity date.
Senior Unsecured Notes (dollars in millions)
Maturity
Date
Rate (%)
Date of Issuance
Par Value
February 2019
5.500%
February 2012
$
383.0
February
2019
3.875%
February 2014
1,000.0
May 2020
5.375%
May 2012
448.0
August
2022
5.000%
August 2012
1,150.0
August 2023
5.000%
August 2013
750.0
Weighted
average rate and total
4.795%
$
3,731.0
On April 4, 2017, CIT gave notice and redeemed on May 4, 2017, 100% of the aggregate principal amount (approximately $4.84
billion) of its outstanding (i) $1,725.8 million, 4.250% Senior Unsecured Notes due August 2017; (ii) $1,465.0 million, 5.250% Senior Unsecured Notes due March 2018; (iii) $695.0 million, 6.625% Series C Unsecured Notes due April 2018; and (iv) $955.9 million, 5.000% Senior Unsecured Notes due May 2018, at an aggregate premium of $98 million.
In
addition, on April 4, 2017, CIT commenced an offer to purchase for cash (the “Debt Tender Offer”) up to $950 million in the aggregate of its (i) 5.500% Series C Unsecured Notes due February 2019; (the "2019 Notes") (ii) 5.375% Senior Unsecured Notes due May 2020 (the "2020 Notes"); and (iii) 5.000% Senior Unsecured Notes due August 2022 (the “2022 Notes” and, together with the 2019 Notes and the 2020 Notes, the “Notes”). On April 18, 2017, CIT elected to increase the aggregate maximum principal amount of Notes accepted
for purchase in the Tender Offer and a total principal amount of $969 million of our 5.500% Series C Unsecured Notes due 2019 were repurchased for total consideration of $1.04 billion, including a premium of $59 million and accrued interest of $9 million.
On September 15, 2017, CIT announced an offer to purchase for cash (the "Tender Offer") up to $800 million in aggregate of its outstanding (i) 5.500% Series C Unsecured Notes due February 2019 (the "2019 Notes"),
(ii) 5.375% Senior Unsecured Notes due May 2020 (the "2020 Notes") and (iii) 5.000% Senior Unsecured Notes due August 2022 (the "2022 Notes" and, together with the 2019 Notes and the 2020 Notes, the "Notes"). On September 28, 2017, CIT announced that all $800 million of the tender offer had been subscribed as of the early participation deadline for total consideration of $861.2 million, including a premium of $50.6 million and accrued interest of $9.3 million. CIT purchased $398 million of the 5.500% Notes due 2019, $302
million of the 5.375% Notes due 2020 and $100 million of the 5.000% Notes due 2022 that were tendered.
In addition to the premium payments noted above, included in the loss on debt extinguishment of $53.5 million and $218.3 million for the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2017, respectively, are transaction costs and acceleration of deferred costs.
The Indentures for the senior unsecured notes
limit the Company’s ability to create liens, merge or consolidate, or sell, transfer, lease or dispose of all or substantially all of its assets. Upon a Change of Control Triggering Event as defined in the Indentures for the senior unsecured notes, holders of the senior unsecured notes will have the right to require the Company, as applicable,
to repurchase all or a portion of the senior unsecured notes at a purchase price equal to 101% of the principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest to the date of such repurchase.
In addition
to the above table, there is an unsecured note outstanding with a 6.0% coupon and a carrying value of $39.5 million (par value of $51 million) that matures in 2036.
Secured Borrowings
At September 30, 2017, the Company had pledged assets (including collateral for the FRB discount window) of $13.9 billion, which included $12.4 billion of loans,
$1.2 billion of operating lease assets, $0.2 billion of cash and $0.1 billion of investment securities.
FHLB Advances
As a member of the FHLB of San Francisco, CIT Bank, N.A. can access financing based on an evaluation of its creditworthiness, statement of financial position, size and eligibility of collateral. The interest rates charged by the FHLB for
CIT GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES – NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
advances typically vary depending upon maturity, the cost of funds of the FHLB, and the collateral provided for the borrowing and the advances are secured by certain Bank assets and bear either a fixed or floating interest rate. The FHLB advances are collateralized by MBS securities and a variety of consumer and commercial loans, including SFR mortgage loans, multi-family mortgage loans, commercial real estate loans, certain foreclosed properties and certain amounts receivable under
a loss sharing agreement with the FDIC.
As of September 30, 2017, the Company had $4.9 billion of financing availability with the FHLB, of which $1.7 billion was unused and available, and $65.9 million was being utilized for issuance of letters of credit related to deposits. FHLB Advances as of September 30, 2017 have a weighted average rate of 1.44%. The following table includes the total outstanding FHLB Advances, and respective
pledged assets.
FHLB Advances with Pledged Assets Summary (dollars in millions)
Set forth in the following table are amounts primarily related to structured financings of and assets owned by consolidated VIEs. Creditors of these VIEs received ownership and/or security interests in the assets. These entities are intended to be bankruptcy remote so that such assets are not available to creditors of CIT or any affiliates of CIT until and unless the related secured borrowings have been fully discharged. These transactions do not meet accounting requirements for sales treatment and are recorded as secured borrowings. Structured financings as of September 30, 2017 had a weighted average rate of 3.62%, which ranged from 0.55% to 5.74%.
Structured
Financings and Pledged Assets Summary (dollars in millions)
At
September 30, 2017, the TRS Transactions related borrowings and pledged assets, respectively, of $501.9 million and $820.1 million were included in Commercial Banking. The TRS Transactions are described in Note 7 — Derivative Financial Instruments.
(2)
At September 30, 2017, secured borrowings and pledged assets, respectively, of $254.7
million and $423.3 million were related to the pending sale of our European Rail business, Nacco, and will be transferred to the buyer upon sale of that business.
Not included in the above table are secured borrowings of discontinued operations of $293.6 million and $1,571.0 million, at September 30, 2017, and December 31, 2016, respectively. See Note 2 — Discontinued Operations.
FRB
The
Company has a borrowing facility with the FRB Discount Window that can be used for short-term, typically overnight, borrowings. The borrowing capacity is determined by the FRB based on the collateral pledged.
Described below are the results of the
Company’s assessment of its variable interests in order to determine its current status with regards to being the VIE primary beneficiary.
CIT GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES – NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
Consolidated
VIEs
The Company utilizes VIEs in the ordinary course of business to support its own and its customers’ financing needs. Each VIE is a separate legal entity and maintains its own books and records.
The most significant types of VIEs that CIT utilizes are ‘on balance sheet’ secured financings of pools of leases and loans originated by the Company where the Company is the primary beneficiary. Refer to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2016 for further discussion.
Unconsolidated VIEs
Unconsolidated VIEs include government sponsored entity (“GSE”) securitization structures, private-label securitizations and limited partnership interests where the Company’s involvement is limited to an investor interest where the Company does not have the obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive benefits that could potentially be significant to the VIE and limited partnership interests.
As
a result of the OneWest Transaction, the Company has certain contractual obligations related to the HECM loans and the GNMA HMBS securitizations, which are VIEs for which CIT is not the primary beneficiary. The Company, as servicer of these HECM loans, is currently obligated to fund future borrower advances, which include fees paid to taxing authorities for borrowers’ unpaid taxes and insurance, mortgage insurance premiums and payments made to borrowers for line of credit draws on HECM loans. In addition, the Company is required to repurchase the HECM loans once the outstanding principal balance is equal to or greater than 98% of the maximum claim amount or when the
property forecloses to OREO, which reduces the secured borrowing balance. Additionally the Company services $143.8 million and $160.2 million of HMBS outstanding principal balance at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively, for transferred loans securitized by IndyMac for which OneWest Bank prior to the acquisition had purchased the mortgage servicing rights (“MSRs”) in connection with the IndyMac Transaction. The carrying value of the MSRs was not significant at September 30, 2017 and December 31,
2016. As the HECM loans are federally insured by the FHA and the secured borrowings guaranteed to the investors by GNMA, the Company does not believe maximum loss exposure as a result of its involvement is material.
The table below presents potential losses that would be incurred under hypothetical circumstances, such that the value of its interests and any associated collateral declines to zero and assuming no recovery or offset from any economic hedges. The Company believes the possibility is remote under this hypothetical scenario; accordingly, this required disclosure is not an indication of expected loss.
Maximum
loss exposure to the unconsolidated VIEs excludes the liability for representations and warranties, corporate guarantees and also excludes servicing advances.
NOTE 7 — DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
As part of managing exposure to interest rate and foreign currency risk, the Company enters into derivative transactions with other financial institutions. The Company also enters into derivative contracts
with customers as part of its Commercial Banking business. The Company does not enter into derivative financial instruments for proprietary trading or speculative purposes.
CIT GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES – NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
See Note 1 — Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016 for further description of its derivative transaction policies.
The following table presents fair values and notional values of derivative financial instruments:
Fair
and Notional Values of Derivative Financial Instruments(1) (dollars in millions)
As of December 31, 2016, CIT was party to two financing facilities between two wholly-owned subsidiaries of CIT, one Canadian (“CFL”) and one Dutch, and Goldman
Sachs International (“GSI”), respectively, which were structured as total return swaps (“TRS”). Amounts available for advances (otherwise known as the unused portion) were accounted for as derivatives and recorded at the estimated fair value. On December 7, 2016, CFL entered into a Fourth Amended and Restated Confirmation (the “Termination Agreement”) with GSI to terminate the Canadian TRS and the facility was terminated on January 17, 2017.
The total facility capacity available under the Dutch TRS was $625 million at September 30, 2017 and December 31,
2016. The utilized portion reflects the borrowing.
The aggregate “notional amounts” of the Dutch TRS of $174.3 million at September 30, 2017, and the Dutch TRS and Canadian TRS of $587.5 million at December 31, 2016, represent the aggregate unused portions and constitute derivative financial instruments. These notional amounts were calculated as the maximum facility commitment amount, $625 million, under the Dutch TRS less the actual adjusted qualifying borrowing base outstanding of $450.7 million
under the facility at September 30, 2017, and the maximum aggregate facility commitment amount, $1,062.3 million, under the Dutch TRS and Canadian TRS less the aggregate actual adjusted qualifying borrowing base outstanding of $474.8 million under the facilities at December 31, 2016. The notional amounts of the derivative will increase as the adjusted qualifying borrowing base decreases due to repayment of the underlying asset-backed securities ("ABS") to investors. If CIT funds additional ABS under the Dutch TRS, the aggregate adjusted qualifying borrowing base of the total return swap will increase and the notional amount of the derivative will decrease accordingly.
Based
on the Company’s valuation, a liability of $13.7 million and $11.3 million was recorded at September 30, 2017, and December 31, 2016, respectively. The increase in liability of $1.1 million and $2.4 million was recognized as a reduction to Other Income for the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2017, respectively. The increase
in liability of $19.7 million and decrease of $7.1 million were recognized as a decrease and an increase to Other Income for the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2016, respectively.
CIT
GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES – NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
Impact of Collateral and Netting Arrangements on the Total Derivative Portfolio
The following tables present a summary of our derivative portfolio, which includes the gross amounts of recognized financial assets and liabilities; the amounts offset in the consolidated balance sheet; the net amounts presented in the consolidated balance sheet; the amounts subject to an enforceable master netting arrangement or similar agreement that were not included in the offset amount above, and the amount of cash collateral received or pledged. Derivative transactions are documented under an International Swaps and Derivatives Association (“ISDA”) agreement.
Offsetting
of Derivative Assets and Liabilities (dollars in millions)(1)
Due
to a change in clearinghouse rules, the Company accounts for swap contracts cleared by the Chicago Mercantile Exchange (“CME”) as “settled-to-market” effective January 2017. As a result, variation margin payments are characterized as settlement of the derivative exposure and variation margin balances are netted against the corresponding derivative mark-to-market balances. The Company’s swap contracts cleared by LCH Clearnet (“LCH”) continue to be accounted for as “collateralized-to-market” and variation margin balances are characterized as collateral
against derivative exposures. At September 30, 2017, gross amount of recognized assets and liabilities were lower by $4.1 million and $19.7 million, respectively.
(2)
The Company’s derivative transactions are governed by ISDA agreements that allow for net settlements of certain payments as well as offsetting of all contracts (“Derivative Financial Instruments”)
with a given counterparty in the event of bankruptcy or default of one of the two parties to the transaction. We believe our ISDA agreements meet the definition of a master netting arrangement or similar agreement for purposes of the above disclosure. In conjunction with the ISDA agreements, the Company has entered into collateral arrangements with its counterparties which provide for the exchange of cash depending on change in the market valuation of the derivative contracts outstanding. Such collateral is available to be applied in settlement of the net balances upon an event of default of one of the counterparties.
(3)
Collateral
pledged or received is included in Other assets or Other liabilities, respectively.
The following table presents the impact of derivatives on the statements of income.
Derivative Instrument Gains and Losses (dollars in millions)
Foreign currency forward contracts — net investment hedges
$
1.8
$
—
$
1.8
$
(28.1
)
$
(29.9
)
Total
$
1.8
$
—
$
1.8
$
(28.1
)
$
(29.9
)
NOTE
8 — FAIR VALUE
Fair Value Hierarchy
The Company is required to report fair value measurements for specified classes of assets and liabilities. See Note 1 — Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016 for a description of its fair value measurement policy.
The
Company characterizes inputs in the determination of fair value according to the fair value hierarchy. The fair value of the Company’s assets and liabilities where the measurement objective specifically requires the use of fair value are set forth in the tables below.
Disclosures that follow in this note exclude assets and liabilities classified as discontinued operations.
Securities
carried at fair value with changes recorded in net income
283.5
—
—
283.5
Equity Securities AFS(2)
34.1
0.3
33.8
—
Derivative
assets at fair value — non-qualifying hedges(1)
94.7
—
94.7
—
Derivative assets at fair value — qualifying
hedges
16.9
—
16.9
—
Total
$
4,103.3
$
200.4
$
3,133.9
$
769.0
Liabilities
Derivative
liabilities at fair value — non-qualifying hedges(1)
$
(68.8
)
$
—
$
(57.3
)
$
(11.5
)
Consideration
holdback liability
(47.2
)
—
—
(47.2
)
FDIC True-up Liability
(61.9
)
—
—
(61.9
)
Total
$
(177.9
)
$
—
$
(57.3
)
$
(120.6
)
(1)
Derivative
fair values include accrued interest
Debt and Equity Securities Classified as AFS and Securities carried at fair value with changes recorded in net income — Debt and equity securities classified as AFS are carried at fair value, as determined either by Level 1, Level 2 or Level 3 inputs. Debt securities classified as AFS included investments in U.S. federal government agency, U.S. Treasury Notes and supranational securities and were valued using Level 2 inputs, primarily quoted prices for similar securities. U.S. Treasury Bills and certain equity securities classified as AFS were valued using Level 1 inputs, primarily quoted prices in active markets. For Agency pass-through MBS, which are classified as Level 2, the Company generally determines estimated
fair value utilizing prices obtained from independent broker dealers and recent trading activity for similar assets. Debt securities classified as AFS and securities carried at fair value with changes recorded in net income represent non-Agency MBS, the market for such securities is not active and the estimated fair value was determined using a discounted cash flow technique. The significant unobservable assumptions, which are verified to the extent possible using broker dealer quotes, are estimated by type of underlying collateral, including credit loss assumptions, estimated prepayment speeds and appropriate discount rates. Given the lack of observable market data, the estimated fair value of the non-agency MBS is classified as Level 3.
Derivative Assets and Liabilities — The
Company’s financial derivatives include interest rate swaps, floors, caps, forwards, forward sale commitments on Agency MBS and credit derivatives. These derivatives are valued using models that incorporate inputs depending on the type of derivative, such as interest rate curves, foreign exchange rates and volatility. Readily observable market inputs to models can be validated to external sources, including industry pricing services, or corroborated through recent trades, broker dealer quotes, yield curves, or other market-related data. As such, these derivative instruments are valued using a Level 2 methodology. In addition, these derivative values incorporate an assessment of the risk of counterparty nonperformance, measured based on the Company’s evaluation of credit risk. The fair value of the TRS derivative, written options on certain CIT Bank CDs and credit derivatives were
estimated using Level 3 inputs.
CIT GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES – NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
FDIC True-up Liability — In connection with the La Jolla Transaction,
the Company recognized a FDIC True-up liability due to the FDIC 45 days after the tenth anniversary of the loss share agreement (April 2020) because the actual and estimated cumulative losses on the acquired covered PCI loans are lower than the cumulative losses originally estimated by the FDIC at the time of acquisition. The FDIC True-up liability was recorded at estimated fair value as of the Acquisition Date and is remeasured to fair value at each reporting date until the contingency is resolved. The FDIC True-up liability was valued using the discounted cash flow method based on the terms specified in the loss share agreement with the FDIC, the actual FDIC payments collected and significant unobservable inputs, including a risk-adjusted discount rate (reflecting the
Company’s credit risk plus a liquidity premium), prepayment and default rates. Due to the significant unobservable inputs used to calculate the estimated fair value, these measurements are classified as Level 3.
Consideration Holdback Liability — In connection with the OneWest acquisition, the parties negotiated 4 separate holdbacks related to select trailing risks, totaling $116 million, which reduced the cash consideration paid at closing. Any unapplied Holdback funds at the end of the respective holdback periods, which range from 1 – 5 years, are payable to the former OneWest shareholders. Unused funds for any of the four holdbacks cannot be applied against another holdback
amount. The range of potential holdback to be paid is from $0 to $116 million. Based on management’s estimate of the probability of each holdback it was determined that the probable amount of holdback to be paid was originally recorded at $62.4 million, and currently is $46.0 million. The amount expected to be paid was discounted based on CIT’s cost of funds, which approximates a market rate. This contingent consideration was measured at fair value at the Acquisition Date and is re-measured at fair value in subsequent accounting periods, with the changes in fair value recorded in the statement of income, until the related contingent issues are resolved. Gross payments, which are determined based on the Company’s
probability assessment, are discounted at a rate approximating the Company’s average coupon rate on deposits and borrowings. Due to the significant unobservable inputs used to calculate the estimated fair value, these measurements are classified as Level 3.
CIT GROUP INC. AND
SUBSIDIARIES – NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
The following tables summarize information about significant unobservable inputs related to the Company’s categories of Level 3 financial assets and liabilities measured on a recurring basis as of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016.
Quantitative
Information about Level 3 Fair Value Measurements — Recurring (dollars in millions)
Securities carried at fair value with changes recorded in net income
283.5
Discounted cash flow
Discount Rate
0.0%
– 34.6%
5.6%
Prepayment Rate
6.1% – 16.2%
11.9%
Default
Rate
1.9% – 8.1%
4.6%
Loss Severity
22.2% – 44.7%
25.8%
Total
Assets
$
769.0
Liabilities
FDIC
True-up liability
$
(61.9
)
Discounted cash flow
Discount Rate
3.2%
3.2%
Consideration holdback liability
(47.2
)
Discounted
cash flow
Payment Probability
0% – 100%
40.9%
Discount Rate
1.3%
– 4.0%
2.1%
Derivative liabilities — non-qualifying
(11.5
)
Market Comparables(1)
Total
Liabilities
$
(120.6
)
(1)
The
valuation of these derivatives is primarily related to the GSI facilities which is based on several factors using a discounted cash flow methodology, including a) funding costs for similar financings based on current market conditions; b) forecasted usage of long-dated facilities through the final maturity date in 2028; and c) forecasted amortization, due to principal payments on the underlying ABS, which impacts the amount of the unutilized portion.
The level of aggregation and diversity within the products disclosed in the tables results in certain ranges of inputs being wide and unevenly distributed across asset and liability categories. For instruments backed by residential real estate, diversity in the portfolio is reflected in a wide range for loss severity due to varying levels of default. The lower end of the range represents high performing loans with
a low probability of default while the higher end of the range relates to more distressed loans with a greater risk of default.
The valuation techniques used for the Company’s Level 3 assets and liabilities, as presented in the previous tables, are described as follows:
▪
Discounted cash flow — Discounted cash flow valuation techniques generally consist of developing an estimate of future cash flows that are expected to occur over the life of an instrument and then discounting those cash flows at a rate of return
that results in the estimated fair value amount. The Company utilizes both the direct and indirect valuation methods. Under the direct method, contractual cash flows are adjusted for expected losses. The adjusted cash
CIT GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
– NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
flows are discounted at a rate which considers other costs and risks, such as market risk and liquidity. Under the indirect method, contractual cash flows are discounted at a rate which reflects the costs and risks associated with the likelihood of generating the contractual cash flows.
▪
Market comparables — Market comparable(s) pricing valuation techniques are used to determine the estimated fair value of certain instruments by incorporating known inputs such as recent transaction prices, pending transactions, or prices of other similar investments which require significant adjustment to reflect differences in
instrument characteristics.
▪
Internal valuation model — The internal model for rate lock valuation uses the spread on borrower mortgage rate and the Fannie Mae pass through rate and applies a conversion factor to assess the derivative value.
Significant unobservable inputs presented in the previous tables are those the Company considers significant to the estimated fair value of the Level 3 asset or liability. The Company considers unobservable
inputs to be significant if, by their exclusion, the estimated fair value of the Level 3 asset or liability would be significantly impacted based on qualitative factors such as nature of the instrument, type of valuation technique used, and the significance of the unobservable inputs on the values relative to other inputs used within the valuation. Following is a description of the significant unobservable inputs provided in the tables.
▪
Default rate — is an estimate of the likelihood of not collecting contractual amounts owed expressed as a constant default rate.
▪
Discount
rate — is a rate of return used to present value the future expected cash flows to arrive at the estimated fair value of an instrument. The discount rate consists of a benchmark rate component and a risk premium component. The benchmark rate component, for example, LIBOR or U.S. Treasury rates, is generally observable within the market and is necessary to appropriately reflect the time value of money. The risk premium component reflects the amount of compensation market participants require due to the uncertainty inherent in the instruments’ cash flows resulting from risks such as credit and liquidity.
▪
Loss severity — is the percentage of contractual cash flows lost in the event of a default.
▪
Prepayment
rate — is the estimated rate at which forecasted prepayments of principal of the related loan or debt instrument are expected to occur, expressed as a constant prepayment rate (“CPR”).
▪
Payment Probability — is an estimate of the likelihood the consideration holdback amount will be required to be paid expressed as a percentage.
▪
Borrower rate — Mortgage rate committed to the borrower by CIT Bank. Effective for up to 90
days.
As reflected above, the Company generally uses discounted cash flow techniques to determine the estimated fair value of Level 3 assets and liabilities. Use of these techniques requires determination of relevant inputs and assumptions, some of which represent significant unobservable inputs and assumptions and as a result, changes in these unobservable inputs (in isolation) may have a significant impact to the estimated fair value. Increases in the probability of default and loss severities will result in lower estimated fair values, as these increases reduce expected cash flows. Increases in the discount rate will result in lower estimated fair values, as these increases reduce the present value of the expected cash flows.
Alternatively
a change in one unobservable input may result in a change to another unobservable input due to the interrelationship among inputs, which may counteract or magnify the estimated fair value impact from period to period. Generally, the value of the Level 3 assets and liabilities estimated using a discounted cash flow technique would decrease (increase) upon an increase (decrease) in discount rate, default rate, loss severity or weighted average life inputs. Discount rates are influenced by market expectations for the underlying collateral performance, and therefore may directionally move with probability and severity of default; however, discount rates are also impacted by broader market forces, such as competing investment yields, sector liquidity, economic news, and other macroeconomic factors. There is no direct interrelationship between prepayments and discount rate. Prepayment rates generally move in the opposite direction of market interest rates. Increase in the
probability of default will generally be accompanied with an increase in loss severity, as both are impacted by underlying collateral values.
CIT GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES – NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
The
following table summarizes the changes in estimated fair value for all assets and liabilities measured at estimated fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3):
Changes in Estimated Fair Value of Level
3 Financial Assets and Liabilities Measured on a Recurring Basis (dollars in millions)
Valuation of the derivatives related to the TRS Transactions and written options on certain CIT Bank CDs.
The Company monitors the availability of observable market data to assess the appropriate classification of financial instruments within the fair value hierarchy. Changes in the observability of key inputs to a fair value measurement may result in a transfer of assets or liabilities between Level 1, 2 and 3. The
Company’s policy is to recognize transfers in and transfers out as of the end of the reporting period. For the quarters ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, there were no transfers into or out of Level 3.
Assets Measured at Estimated Fair Value on a Non-recurring Basis
Certain assets or liabilities are required to be measured at estimated fair value on a nonrecurring basis subsequent to initial recognition. Generally, these adjustments are the result of LOCOM or other impairment accounting. In determining the estimated fair values during the period, the
Company determined that substantially all the changes in estimated fair value were due to declines in market conditions versus instrument specific credit risk. This was determined by examining the changes in market factors relative to instrument specific factors.
CIT GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
– NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
The following table presents assets measured at estimated fair value on a non-recurring basis for which a non-recurring change in fair value has been recorded in the current year:
Carrying Value of Assets Measured at Fair Value
on a Non-recurring Basis (dollars in millions)
Assets
of continuing operations that are measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis are as follows:
Assets Held for Sale — Assets held for sale are recorded at the lower of cost or fair value on the balance sheet. As there is no liquid secondary market for the assets held for sale in the Company’s portfolio, the fair value is estimated based on a binding contract, current letter of intent or other third-party valuation, or using internally generated valuations or discounted cash flow technique, all of which are Level 3 inputs. Carrying value of assets held for sale with impairment approximates fair value at September
30, 2017 and December 31, 2016.
Other Real Estate Owned — Other real estate owned represents collateral acquired from the foreclosure of secured real estate loans. Other real estate owned is measured at LOCOM less disposition costs. Estimated fair values of other real estate owned are reviewed on a quarterly basis and any decline in value below cost is recorded as impairment. Estimated fair value is generally based on market data, if available or broker price opinions or independent appraisals, adjusted for costs to sell. The estimated costs to sell are incremental direct costs to transact a sale, such as broker commissions, legal fees, closing costs and title transfer fees. The costs must be essential to the sale and would not have been
incurred if the decision to sell had not been made. The range of inputs used to estimate cost to sell were 5.3% – 7.8%; which resulted in a weighted average of 5.7% at September 30, 2017. Also a significant unobservable input is the binding contract, appraised value or the sales price and thus is classified as Level 3. As of the reporting date, OREO estimated fair value, including costs to sell, was $27.3 million.
Impaired Loans — Impaired finance loans of $500,000
or greater that are placed on non-accrual status are subject to periodic individual review in conjunction with the Company’s ongoing problem loan management (PLM) function. Impairment occurs when, based on current information and events, it is probable that CIT will be unable to collect all amounts due according to contractual terms of the agreement. Impairment is measured as the shortfall between estimated value and recorded investment in the loan, with the estimated value determined using fair value of collateral and other cash flows if the loan is collateralized, the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the contract’s effective interest rate, or observable market prices. The significant unobservable inputs result in the Level 3 classification. As of the reporting date,
the carrying value of impaired loans approximates fair value.
CIT GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES – NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
Fair Values of Financial Instruments
The
carrying values and estimated fair values of financial instruments presented below exclude leases and certain other assets and liabilities, which are not required for disclosure.
Derivative
assets at fair value — non-qualifying hedges
94.7
—
94.7
—
94.7
Derivative
assets at fair value — qualifying hedges
16.9
—
16.9
—
16.9
Assets
held for sale (excluding leases)
428.4
—
175.0
264.6
439.6
Loans
(excluding leases)
26,683.0
—
390.3
26,456.4
26,846.7
Investment
securities(1)
4,491.1
200.4
3,199.6
1,094.2
4,494.2
Indemnification
assets(2)
233.4
—
—
201.0
201.0
Other
assets subject to fair value disclosure and unsecured counterparty receivables(3)
712.2
—
—
712.2
712.2
Financial
Liabilities
Deposits(4)
(32,323.2
)
—
—
(32,490.9
)
(32,490.9
)
Derivative
liabilities at fair value — non-qualifying hedges
(68.8
)
—
(57.3
)
(11.5
)
(68.8
)
Borrowings(4)
(15,097.8
)
—
(14,457.8
)
(1,104.9
)
(15,562.7
)
Credit
balances of factoring clients
(1,292.0
)
—
—
(1,292.0
)
(1,292.0
)
Other
liabilities subject to fair value disclosure(5)
(1,003.6
)
—
—
(1,003.6
)
(1,003.6
)
(1)
Level
3 estimated fair value at September 30, 2017, includes debt securities AFS ($411.0 million), securities carried at fair value with changes recorded in net income ($247.7 million), non-marketable investments ($277.5 million), and debt securities HTM ($70.9 million). Level 3 estimated fair value at December 31, 2016 included debt securities AFS ($485.5 million), debt securities carried at fair value with changes recorded in net income ($283.5 million), non-marketable investments ($256.4 million),
and debt securities HTM ($68.8 million).
(2)
The indemnification assets included in the above table do not include Agency claims indemnification ($28.9 million and $108.0 million at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively), as they are not considered financial instruments.
(3)
Other
assets subject to fair value disclosure primarily include accrued interest receivable and miscellaneous receivables. These assets have carrying values that approximate fair value generally due to the short-term nature and are classified as Level 3. The unsecured counterparty receivables primarily consist of amounts owed to CIT from GSI for debt discount, return of collateral posted to GSI and settlements resulting from market value changes to asset-backed securities underlying the TRS.
(4)
Deposits and borrowings include accrued interest, which is included in “Other liabilities” in the Balance Sheet.
(5)
Other
liabilities subject to fair value disclosure include accounts payable, accrued liabilities, customer security and maintenance deposits and miscellaneous liabilities. The fair value of these approximate carrying value and are classified as level 3.
CIT GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
– NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
The methods and assumptions used to estimate the fair value of each class of financial instruments are explained below:
Cash and interest bearing deposits — Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash approximate estimated fair value and are classified as Level 1.
Derivatives — The estimated fair values of derivatives were calculated using observable market data and represent the gross amount receivable or payable to terminate, taking into account current market rates, which represent Level 2 inputs, except for the TRS derivative and written options on certain CIT Bank CDs and credit derivatives that utilized Level 3 inputs.
See Note 7 — Derivative Financial Instruments for notional principal amounts and fair values.
Investment Securities — Debt and equity securities classified as AFS are carried at fair value, as determined either by Level 1, Level 2 or Level 3 inputs. Debt securities classified as AFS included investments in U.S. federal government agency securities, U.S. Treasury Notes and supranational securities and were valued using Level 2 inputs, primarily quoted prices for similar securities. Debt securities carried at fair value with changes recorded in net income include non-agency MBS where the market for such securities is not active; therefore the estimated fair value was determined using a discounted cash flow technique, which is a Level 3 input. U.S. Treasury Bills and certain equity securities classified as AFS were
valued using Level 1 inputs, primarily quoted prices in active markets. Debt securities classified as HTM include government agency securities and were valued using Level 2 inputs, primarily quoted prices for similar securities. For debt securities HTM where no market rate was available, Level 3 inputs were utilized. Debt securities HTM are securities that the Company has both the ability and the intent to hold until maturity and are carried at amortized cost and periodically assessed for OTTI, with the cost basis reduced when impairment is deemed to be other-than-temporary. Non-marketable equity investments utilize Level 3 inputs to estimate fair value and are generally recorded under the cost or equity method of accounting and are periodically assessed for OTTI, with the net asset values reduced when impairment is deemed to be other-than-temporary. For investments in limited partnership
equity interests, the Company used the net asset value provided by the fund manager as an appropriate measure of fair value.
Assets held for sale — Assets held for sale are recorded at the lower of cost or fair value on the balance sheet. Of the assets held for sale above, $3.5 million carrying amount at September 30, 2017 was valued using Level 2 inputs. As there is no liquid secondary market for the other assets held for sale in the Company’s portfolio, the fair value is estimated based on a binding contract,
current letter of intent or other third-party valuation, or using internally generated valuations or discounted cash flow technique, all of which are Level 3 inputs. Commercial loans are generally valued individually, while small ticket commercial loans are valued on an aggregate portfolio basis.
Loans — Within the Loans category, there are several types of loans as follows:
▪
Commercial and Consumer Loans — Of the loan balance above, $459.9 million and $390.3 million at September 30,
2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively, were valued using Level 2 inputs. As there is no liquid secondary market for the other loans in the Company’s portfolio, the fair value is estimated based on discounted cash flow analyses which use Level 3 inputs at both September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016. In addition to the characteristics of the underlying contracts, key inputs to the analysis include interest rates, prepayment rates, and credit spreads. For the commercial loan portfolio,
the market based credit spread inputs are derived from instruments with comparable credit risk characteristics obtained from independent third party vendors. As these Level 3 unobservable inputs are specific to individual loans/collateral types, management does not believe that sensitivity analysis of individual inputs is meaningful, but rather that sensitivity is more meaningfully assessed through the evaluation of aggregate carrying values of the loans. The fair value of loans at September 30, 2017 was $26.2 billion which was 101.6% of carrying value. The fair value of loans at December 31, 2016 was $26.8 billion, which was 100.6%
of carrying value.
▪
Impaired Loans — The value of impaired loans is estimated using the fair value of collateral (on an orderly liquidation basis) if the loan is collateralized, the present value of expected cash flows utilizing the current market rate for such loan, or observable market price. As these Level 3 unobservable inputs are specific to individual loans/collateral types, management does not believe that sensitivity analysis of individual inputs is meaningful, but rather that sensitivity is more meaningfully assessed through the evaluation of aggregate carrying values of impaired loans relative to contractual amounts owed (unpaid principal balance or “UPB”) from customers. As of September 30,
2017, the UPB related to impaired loans totaled $261.5 million. Including related allowances, these loans are carried at $210.6 million, or 80.5% of UPB. Of these amounts, $74.3 million and $61.7 million of UPB and carrying value, respectively, relate to loans with no specific allowance. As of December 31, 2016 the UPB related to impaired loans including loans for which the Company was applying the income recognition and disclosure guidance in ASC 310-30 (Loans and Debt Securities Acquired with Deteriorated Credit Quality), totaled $244.3
million. Including related allowances, these
CIT GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES – NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
loans were carried at $188.2 million,
or 77.0% of UPB. Of these amounts, $74.7 million and $55.5 million of UPB and carrying value, respectively, relate to loans with no specific allowance. The difference between UPB and carrying value reflects cumulative charge-offs on accounts remaining in process of collection, FSA discounts and allowances. See Note 3 — Loans for more information.
▪
PCI loans — These loans are valued by grouping the loans into performing and non-performing groups and stratifying the loans based on common risk characteristics such as product type, FICO score and other economic
attributes. Due to a lack of observable market data, the estimated fair value of these loan portfolios was based on an internal model using unobservable inputs, including discount rates, prepayment rates, delinquency roll-rates, and loss severities. Due to the significance of the unobservable inputs, these instruments are classified as Level 3.
▪
Jumbo Mortgage Loans — The estimated fair value was determined by discounting the future cash flows using the current rates at which similar loans would be made to borrowers with similar credit ratings and for the same remaining maturities. Due to the unobservable nature of the inputs used in deriving the estimated fair value of these instruments, these loans are classified
as Level 3.
Indemnification Assets — The Company’s indemnification assets relating to the SFR loans purchased in the OneWest Bank Transaction are measured on the same basis as the related indemnified item, and the underlying SFR loans. The estimated fair values reflect the present value of expected reimbursements under the indemnification agreements based on the loan performance discounted at an estimated market rate, and classified as Level 3.
Deposits — The estimated fair value of deposits with no stated maturity, such as demand deposit accounts (including custodial deposits), money market accounts, and savings accounts is the amount payable
on demand at the reporting date.
The estimated fair value of time deposits is determined using a discounted cash flow analysis. The discount rate for the time deposit accounts is derived from the rate currently offered on alternate funding sources with similar maturities. Discount rates used in the present value calculation are based on the Company’s average current deposit rates for similar terms, which are Level 3 inputs.
Borrowings
▪
Unsecured
debt — Approximately $3.8 billion par value at September 30, 2017 and $10.6 billion at December 31, 2016 were valued using market inputs, which are Level 2 inputs.
▪
Secured borrowings — Secured borrowings include both structured financings and FHLB Advances. Approximately $3.8 billion par value at September 30,
2017 and $3.3 billion par value at December 31, 2016 were valued using market inputs, which are Level 2 inputs. Where market estimates were not available for approximately $1.0 billion and $1.1 billion par value at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively, values were estimated using a discounted cash flow analysis with a discount rate approximating current market rates for issuances by CIT of similar debt, which are Level 3 inputs. Included in the above, the estimated fair value of FHLB Advances is based on
a discounted cash flow model that utilizes benchmark interest rates and other observable market inputs. The discounted cash flow model uses the contractual advance features to determine the cash flows with a zero spread to the forward FHLB curve, which are discounted using observable benchmark interest rates. As the model inputs can be observed in a liquid market and the model does not require significant judgment, FHLB advances are classified as Level 2.
Credit balances of factoring clients — The impact of the time value of money from the unobservable discount rate for credit balances of factoring clients is inconsequential due to the short term nature of these balances (typically 90 days or less) as of September 30, 2017 and December
31, 2016. Accordingly, credit balances of factoring clients approximate estimated fair value and are classified as Level 3.
During
the quarter, CIT repurchased a total of $119.3 million in common shares via open market repurchases of 2,660,893 common shares at an average share price of $44.82. We also completed the previously announced accelerated share repurchase program (ASR), which had commenced in the prior quarter, for which CIT received an additional 1,452,119 common shares. The overall average price of the entire ASR was $47.82.
In the previous quarter, CIT repurchased a total of $3.3 billion in common shares via an equity tender offer, in which we repurchased approximately 57.3 million
common shares at a purchase price of $48 per share; open market repurchases of 818,071 common shares at an average price of $46.45; and the ASR. In the ASR, CIT paid to the dealer $512 million in exchange for the initial delivery of approximately 9,253,668 common shares.
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss
The following table details the components of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss, net of tax:
Components
of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss (dollars in millions)
CIT GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES – NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
Other Comprehensive Income/(Loss)
The amounts included in the Statement of Comprehensive Income are net of income taxes.
Foreign
currency translation reclassification adjustments impacting net income were insignificant for the quarters ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, and $26.2 million and $4.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively. $16.7 million of the reclassification from AOCI during the second quarter of 2017 was a result of the sale of the Commercial Air business and is recorded in gain on sale
of discontinued operations. The change in income taxes associated with foreign currency translation adjustments was $9.2 million and $(1.4) million for the quarters ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, and $26.3 million and $13.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively.
The changes in
benefit plans net gain/(loss) and prior service (cost)/credit reclassification adjustments impacting net income were $0.1 million for the quarters ended September 30, 2017 and 2016; and were $0.7 million and $1.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and September 30, 2016 , respectively. The change in income taxes associated with changes in benefit plans net gain/(loss) and prior service (cost)/credit was insignificant for the quarters ended September 30, 2017 and 2016,
and was $(0.6) million and insignificant for the year to date periods ended September 30, 2017 and September 30, 2016, respectively.
Reclassification adjustments impacting net income for unrealized gains on available for sale securities was $(2.1) million and insignificant for the quarters ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively and was $(2.3) million and insignificant for the nine months ended September 30,
2017 and 2016, respectively. The change in income taxes associated with net unrealized gains on available for sale securities was $(2.3) million and $(3.3) million for quarters ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively and was $(6.5) million and $(12.4) million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively.
The
Company has operations primarily in North America. The functional currency for foreign operations is generally the local currency. The value of assets and liabilities of these operations is translated into U.S. dollars at the rate of exchange in effect at the balance sheet date. Revenue and expense items are translated at the average exchange rates during the year. The resulting foreign currency translation gains and losses, as well as offsetting gains and losses on hedges of net investments in foreign operations, are reflected in AOCI. Transaction gains and losses resulting from exchange rate changes on transactions denominated in currencies other than the functional currency are recorded in Other Income.
Reclassifications
Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive (Income) Loss (dollars in millions)
Changes
in benefit plan net gain/(loss) and prior service (cost)/credit losses
0.8
(0.1
)
0.7
1.7
(0.2
)
1.5
Operating
Expenses
Unrealized
net gains on available for sale securities
(3.6
)
1.3
(2.3
)
—
—
—
Other
Income
Total Reclassifications out of AOCI
$
21.3
$
3.3
$
24.6
$
5.3
$
0.9
$
6.2
(1)
$16.7 million of the reclassification from AOCI during the second quarter of 2017 was a result of the sale of the Commercial Air business and is recorded in gain on sale of discontinued operations.
CIT GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
– NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
NOTE 10 — REGULATORY CAPITAL
The Company and the Bank are each subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by the FRB and the OCC. Quantitative measures established by regulation to ensure capital adequacy require that the Company and the Bank each maintain minimum amounts and ratios of Total, Tier 1 and Common Equity Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets, and of Tier 1 capital to average assets. In July 2013 the FRB, OCC and Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation issued a final
rule (the “Basel III Final Rule”) establishing risk-based capital guidelines. We compute capital ratios in accordance with Federal Reserve capital guidelines and OCC capital guidelines for assessing adequacy of capital for the Company and CIT Bank, respectively. At September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the regulatory capital guidelines applicable to the Company and the Bank were based on the Basel III Final Rule.
The calculation of the
Company’s regulatory capital ratios are subject to review and consultation with the FRB, which may result in refinements to amounts reported at September 30, 2017.
The following table summarizes the actual and minimum required capital ratios:
Capital Components and Ratios (dollars
in millions)
Effective
minimum ratios under Basel III guidelines(2)
5.750
%
5.125
%
5.750
%
5.125
%
Tier 1 Capital Ratio:
Actual
14.9
%
14.0
%
13.9
%
13.4
%
Effective
minimum ratios under Basel III guidelines(2)
7.250
%
6.625
%
7.250
%
6.625
%
Total Capital Ratio:
Actual
15.9
%
14.8
%
15.1
%
14.7
%
Effective
minimum ratios under Basel III guidelines(2)
9.250
%
8.625
%
9.250
%
8.625
%
Tier 1 Leverage Ratio:
Actual
13.4
%
13.9
%
11.7
%
10.9
%
Required
minimum ratio for capital adequacy purposes
4.0
%
4.0
%
4.0
%
4.0
%
(1) The decrease in CIT's Risk-Weighted Assets
from December 31, 2016 to September 30, 2017, reflects the sale of the Commercial Air business.
(2) Required ratios under Basel III Final Rule in effect as of the reporting date including the partially phased-in capital conservation buffer.
NOTE 11 — INCOME TAXES
The
Company’s global effective income tax rate from continuing operations including discrete tax items for the third quarter and the nine months ended September 30, 2017 was (116)% and (39)%, respectively, down from 37% in the year-ago quarter and 46% in the year-ago nine months period. The decrease in the global effective tax rate is primarily driven by discrete items that occurred in the current quarter. The effective tax rate in the year-ago nine months period was meaningfully above the U.S. federal statutory tax rate due to the impact of certain unfavorable tax adjustments, including certain international income that was subject to incremental tax in the U.S.
Included in the net discrete
tax benefit of $138.4 million and $220.5 million for the current quarter and year-to-date was:
•
$140.4 million deferred tax benefit recorded in the current quarter related to the recognition of a $235 million deferred tax asset on an equity investment in a wholly-owned foreign subsidiary, offset by a $95 million valuation allowance,
•
$19.3
million current tax benefit recorded in the prior quarter, including interest and penalties, related to legacy OneWest Bank matters, including the release of a tax reserve upon the favorable resolution of an uncertain tax position and recognition of expected tax refunds,
•
$65.2 million deferred tax benefit recorded in the prior quarter related to debt extinguishment costs,
CIT GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES – NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
•
$6.9 million deferred tax benefit recorded in the prior quarter related to the recognition of a deferred tax asset on the Company’s investment in Nacco, which is now categorized as
“held for sale.”
•
$13.9 million in deferred tax expense recorded in the first quarter related to the restructuring of legal entities in preparation for the Commercial Air sale, and
•
$2.6 million of miscellaneous other year to date net tax benefit items.
Included in the net discrete tax expense of $9.0 million and $1.6
million for the year-ago quarter and nine months period was:
•
$15.7 million deferred tax expense recorded in the year-ago quarter related to the establishment of valuation allowances against certain international net deferred tax assets due to our international platform rationalizations,
•
$13.9 million current tax benefit recorded in the prior year first quarter on the release of tax reserves, including interest and penalties,
upon the resolution of uncertain tax positions in prior year non-U.S. income tax filings with the local tax authorities,
•
$0.2 million of miscellaneous net tax benefit items of which $6.7 million miscellaneous net tax benefit items were recorded in the year-ago quarter.
The quarterly income tax expense is based on a projection of the Company’s annual effective tax rate. This annual effective tax rate is applied to the year-to-date consolidated pre-tax income to determine the interim provision for income taxes
before discrete items. The year-to-date impact of any change in the projected annual effective tax rate from the prior quarter estimate is included in the current quarter income tax expense. The effective tax rate each period is impacted by a number of factors, including the relative mix of domestic and international earnings, adjustments to the valuation allowances, and discrete items. The currently forecasted effective tax rate may vary from the actual year-end 2017 effective tax rate due to the changes in these factors.
The Company maintained a valuation allowance of $30 million against certain non-U.S. reporting entities’ net deferred tax assets ("DTAs") and $240 million against U.S. state DTAs
on certain state net operating losses as of September 30, 2017. The Company’s ability to recognize DTAs is evaluated on a quarterly basis to determine if there are any significant events that would affect its ability to utilize existing DTAs. If events are identified that affect its ability to utilize its DTAs, valuation allowances may be adjusted accordingly.
Liabilities for Uncertain Tax Positions
The Company’s liability for uncertain tax positions ("UTPs") before interest and penalties, was $13.7 million at September 30, 2017 and $36.4
million at December 31, 2016. The Company anticipates changes to its UTP liability upon the resolution of open tax matters and closure of statutes of limitations. The majority of the $22.7 million net reduction in the year-end liability related to a $15.7 million decrease during the second quarter associated with favorable audit resolutions with state taxing authorities on UTPs taken on prior year U.S. state income tax returns. Approximately $4.9 million of the reduction related to UTPs in entities that were transferred with the Commercial Air sale. Management estimates that the total potential liability before interest and penalties may be reduced by up to $5
million within the next twelve months. The Company’s accrued liability for interest and penalties totaled $7.3 million at September 30, 2017 and $11.7 million at December 31, 2016. The change in balance is mainly related to interest and penalties associated with the above mentioned UTPs taken on certain prior-year U.S. state income tax returns and uncertain tax positions related to entities included in the Commercial Air sale. The Company recognizes accrued interest and penalties on unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense.
Guarantees, acceptances and other recourse obligations
1.5
—
1.5
1.6
Purchase
and Funding Commitments
Aerospace purchase commitments (1)
—
—
—
8,683.5
Rail
and other purchase commitments
227.4
—
227.4
300.7
(1) The Aerospace purchase commitments in the table above are associated
with Aerospace discontinued operations which was sold in April 2017.
Discontinued Operations
Financing commitments include HECM reverse mortgage loan commitments associated with Financial Freedom discontinued operations of $36 million at September 30, 2017 and $42 million at December 31, 2016.
Financing Commitments
Commercial
Financing
commitments, referred to as loan commitments or lines of credit, reflect CIT’s agreements to lend to its customers, subject to the customers’ compliance with contractual obligations. Included in the table above are commitments that have been extended to and accepted by customers, clients or agents, but on which the criteria for funding have not been completed of $1.2 billion at September 30, 2017 and $572 million at December 31, 2016. Financing commitments also include credit line agreements to Business Capital clients that are cancellable by us only after a notice period. The notice period is typically 90 days or less. The amount available under
these credit lines, net of the amount of receivables assigned to us, was $290.2 million at September 30, 2017 and $335 million at December 31, 2016. As financing commitments may not be fully drawn, may expire unused, may be reduced or cancelled at the customer’s request, and may require the customer to be in compliance with certain conditions, total commitment amounts do not necessarily reflect actual future cash flow requirements.
The table above includes approximately $1.7 billion of undrawn financing commitments at September 30,
2017 and December 31, 2016 for instances where the customer is not in compliance with contractual obligations or does not have adequate collateral to borrow against the unused facility, and therefore CIT does not have the contractual obligation to lend.
At September 30, 2017, substantially all undrawn financing commitments were senior facilities. Most of the Company’s undrawn and available financing commitments are in the Commercial Banking segment.
The table above excludes uncommitted revolving
credit facilities extended by Business Capital to its clients for working capital purposes. In connection with these facilities, Business Capital has the sole discretion throughout the duration of these facilities to determine the amount of credit that may be made available to its clients at any time and whether to honor any specific advance requests made by its clients under these credit facilities.
Consumer
The Company is committed to fund draws on certain reverse mortgages in conjunction with loss sharing agreements with the FDIC. The FDIC agreed to indemnify the Company for losses on the first $200
million of draws that occur subsequent to the purchase date. In addition, the FDIC agreed to fund any other draws in excess of the $200 million. As of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, $135 million and $145 million, respectively, had been advanced on the reverse mortgage loans post March 2009. The Company’s exposure for additional draws on loan commitments on these purchased reverse mortgage loans was $65 million at September 30, 2017 and $55 million
at December 31, 2016. The aggregate amount advanced and the remaining loan commitments on these purchased loans increase or decrease as the Company funds additional draws or outstanding draws are repaid. See Note 5 — Indemnification Assets of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016 for further discussion on the loss sharing agreements with the FDIC. In addition, as servicer of HECM loans, the Company is required to repurchase the loan out
of the GNMA HMBS securitization pools once the outstanding principal balance is equal to or greater than 98% of the maximum claim amount or when the property forecloses to OREO. Refer to Note 3 — Loans for further detail regarding the purchased HECM loans due to this servicer obligation.
Also included was the Company’s commitment to fund draws on certain home equity lines of credit (“HELOCs”). Under the HELOC participation and servicing agreement entered into with the FDIC, the FDIC agreed to reimburse the Company for a portion of the draws that the
Company made on the purchased HELOCs.
Letters of Credit
In the normal course of meeting the needs of clients, CIT sometimes enters into agreements to provide financing and letters of credit. Standby letters of credit obligate the issuer of the letter of credit to pay the beneficiary if a client on whose behalf the letter of credit was issued does not meet its obligation. These financial instruments generate fees and involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit risk in excess of amounts recognized in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. To minimize potential credit risk, CIT generally requires collateral and in some cases additional forms of credit support from the client.
Deferred Purchase Agreements
A
Deferred Purchase Agreement (“DPA”) is provided in conjunction with factoring, whereby CIT provides a client with credit protection for trade receivables without purchasing the receivables. The trade receivable terms are generally ninety days or less. If the client’s customer is unable to pay an undisputed receivable solely as the result of credit risk, then CIT purchases the receivable from the client. The outstanding amount in the table above is the maximum potential exposure that CIT would be required to pay under all DPAs. This maximum amount would only occur if all receivables subject to DPAs default in the manner described above, thereby requiring CIT to purchase all such receivables from the DPA clients.
The table above includes $2,127 million and $1,962 million of DPA credit
protection at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively, related to receivables which have been presented to us for credit protection after shipment of goods has occurred and the customer has been invoiced. The table also includes $98 million and $99 million available under DPA credit line agreements, net of the amount of DPA credit protection provided at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively. The DPA credit line agreements specify a contractually committed amount of DPA
credit protection and are cancellable by us only after a notice period. The notice period is typically 90 days or less.
The methodology used to determine the DPA liability is similar to the methodology used to determine the allowance for loan losses associated with the finance loans, which reflects embedded losses based on various factors, including expected losses reflecting the Company’s internal customer and facility credit ratings. The liability recorded in Other Liabilities related to the DPAs totaled $5.8 million and $6.1 million at September 30, 2017 and December 31,
2016, respectively.
Purchase and Funding Commitments
CIT’s purchase commitments relate primarily to purchases of rail equipment.
The Company’s rail business entered into commitments to purchase railcars from multiple manufacturers. At September 30, 2017, approximately 1,756 railcars remain to be purchased from manufacturers with deliveries through 2018. Rail equipment purchase commitments are at fixed prices
subject to price increases for certain materials.
Other purchase commitments primarily relate to Equipment Finance.
Other Commitments
The Company has commitments to invest in affordable housing investments, and other investments qualifying for community reinvestment tax credits. These commitments were $105 million at September 30, 2017 and $62 million at December 31,
2016. These commitments are payable on demand and are recorded in Other liabilities.
NOTE 13 — CONTINGENCIES
Litigation and other Contingencies
CIT is involved, and from time to time in the future may be involved, in a number of pending and threatened judicial, regulatory, and arbitration proceedings relating to matters that arise in connection with the conduct of its business (collectively, “Litigation”). In view of the inherent difficulty of predicting the outcome of Litigation matters, particularly when such matters are in their early stages
or where the claimants seek indeterminate damages, CIT cannot state with confidence what the eventual outcome of the pending Litigation will be, what the timing of the ultimate resolution of these matters will be, or what the eventual loss, fines, or penalties related to each pending matter will be, if any. In accordance with applicable accounting guidance, CIT establishes reserves for Litigation when those matters present loss contingencies as to which it is both probable that a loss will occur and the amount of such loss can be reasonably estimated. Based on currently available information, CIT believes that the results of Litigation that is currently pending, taken together, will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition, but may be material to the Company’s operating
results or cash flows for any particular period, depending in part on its operating results for that period. The actual results of resolving such matters may be substantially higher than the amounts reserved.
For certain Litigation matters in which the Company is involved, the Company is able to estimate a range of reasonably possible losses in excess of established reserves and insurance. For other matters for which a loss is probable or reasonably possible, such an estimate cannot be determined. For Litigation and other matters where losses are reasonably possible, management currently estimates the aggregate range of reasonably possible losses as up to $90 million in excess of established reserves and insurance
related to those matters, if any. This estimate represents reasonably possible losses (in excess of established reserves and insurance) over the life of such Litigation, which may span a currently indeterminable number of years, and is based on information currently available as of September 30, 2017. The matters underlying the estimated range will change from time to time, and actual results may vary significantly from this estimate.
Those Litigation matters for which an estimate is not reasonably possible or as to which a loss does not appear to be reasonably possible, based on current information, are not included within this estimated range and, therefore, this estimated range does not represent the Company’s maximum loss exposure.
The
foregoing statements about CIT’s Litigation are based on the Company’s judgments, assumptions, and estimates and are necessarily subjective and uncertain. The Company has several hundred threatened and pending judicial, regulatory and arbitration proceedings at various stages. Several of the Company’s significant Litigation matters are described below.
Brazilian Tax Matter
Banco Commercial Investment Trust do Brasil S.A. (“Banco CIT”), CIT’s Brazilian bank subsidiary, was sold in a stock sale in the fourth quarter of 2015, thereby
transferring the legal liabilities of Banco CIT to the buyer. Under the terms of the stock sale, CIT remains liable for indemnification to the buyer for any losses resulting from certain Imposto Sobre Circulaco de Mercadorias e Servicos (“ICMS”) tax appeals relating to disputed local tax assessments on leasing services and importation of equipment (the “ICMS Tax Appeals”).
Notices of infraction were issued to Banco CIT relating to the payment of ICMS taxes charged by Brazilian states in connection with the importation of equipment. The state of São Paulo claims that Banco CIT should have paid it ICMS taxes for tax years 2006 - 2009 because Banco CIT, the purchaser, was located in São Paulo. Instead, the ICMS taxes were paid to the state of Espirito Santo where the imported equipment arrived. A regulation issued by São Paulo in December 2013 reaffirms a 2009 agreement
by São Paulo to conditionally recognize ICMS tax payments made to Espirito Santo. An assessment related to taxes paid to Espirito Santo was upheld in a ruling issued by the administrative court in May 2014. That ruling has been appealed. Another assessment related to taxes paid to Espirito Santo remains pending. Petitions seeking São Paulo’s recognition of the taxes paid to Espirito Santo have been filed in a general amnesty program.
CIT
GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES – NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
Hawaiian Foreclosure Litigation Claims
Based on recent rulings of the Hawaii Supreme Court, lawsuits have been filed against CIT in Hawaii alleging technical violations in non-judicial foreclosures. Similar cases have been filed against other mortgage lenders in Hawaii. The Hawaii Supreme Court did not establish a clear methodology for calculating alleged damages if a violation is proven and there is substantial dispute in this regard. In many instances the borrower had no equity in the home at the time of foreclosure. Damages sought in these cases include any lost equity, compensation for loss of use of the house and, in some cases, treble
or punitive damages under Hawaii's unfair practices law. At this time, the Company does not have sufficient information to make an assessment of the outcome or the impact of these cases.
Brazilian Indemnification Claims
In connection with the 2015 sale of Banco CIT in Brazil, CIT has received notice from the buyer regarding indemnification claims for losses incurred or which may be incurred in connection with employment lawsuits filed by former employees of Banco CIT related to the period prior to the closing of the sale. The demands of the former employees include, among other things, payment of compensation for overtime work, equal pay for performing the same work as others at a lower salary, salary
differences for failing to include requisite payments in plaintiffs' salaries; and treatment of certain plaintiffs as an employee instead of independent contractors. More than thirty (30) labor lawsuits have been filed to date and more than forty five (45) current and former employees can still file similar lawsuits for which the buyer may seek indemnification from CIT. Additional lawsuits asserting similar claims may also be brought by independent contractors claiming to be employees. Under Brazilian law, an employee/independent contractor can recover damages for employment-related claims for the five (5) year period preceding the filing of a lawsuit thus the effective statute of limitations for damages potentially compensable by CIT does not expire until November 2020, five
years after the transaction closed.
HUD OIG Investigation
In 2009, OneWest Bank acquired the reverse mortgage loan portfolio and related servicing rights of Financial Freedom Senior Funding Corporation, including HECM loans, from the FDIC as Receiver for IndyMac Federal Bank. HECM loans are insured by the FHA, and administered by HUD. In addition, Financial Freedom is the servicer of HECM loans owned by third party investors. Beginning in the third quarter of 2015, the Office of the Inspector General for HUD (the “HUD OIG”), served a series of subpoenas on the Company regarding HECM loans. The subpoenas requested documents and other information related to Financial Freedom’s HECM loan origination
and servicing business, including the curtailment of interest payments on HECM insurance claims. On May 16, 2017 CIT entered into a settlement of approximately $89 million to resolve the servicing related claims. The settlement was within CIT’s existing reserves and included interest to be reimbursed to HUD. CIT has provided information and documents responsive to the subpoena’s request for information relating to the mortgage originations and does not currently expect the outcome of the remaining loan origination matter to have a material adverse effect on CIT’s financial condition or results of operations.
NY Attorney General
In the second quarter of 2017, the Office of the Attorney General
of the State of New York (“NYAG”), served a subpoena on the Company regarding HECM loans. The subpoena requested documents and other information related to Financial Freedom’s HECM loan business in the State of New York. The NYAG subsequently withdrew the subpoena and has requested the Company’s continued voluntary cooperation with the inquiry. The Company does not have sufficient information to make an assessment of the outcome or the impact of the NYAG’s ongoing inquiry.
Ocwen Indemnification Obligations
In
connection with the OneWest acquisition, CIT assumed the obligation to indemnify Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC (“Ocwen”) against certain claims that may arise from servicing errors, which are deemed attributable to the period prior to June 2013, when OneWest sold its servicing business to Ocwen, such as repurchase demands, non-recoverable servicing advances and compensatory fees imposed by the GSEs for servicer delays in completing the foreclosure process within the prescribed timeframe established by the servicer guides or agreements, exclusive of losses or repurchase obligations and certain agency fees, and which are limited to an aggregate amount of $150 million for claims noticed by February 28, 2017 to CIT. Ocwen is responsible for liabilities arising from servicer obligations following the service transfer date because substantially all risks and rewards of ownership
were transferred; except for certain Agency fees or loan repurchase amounts. As of September 30, 2017, the cumulative indemnification payments totaled approximately $56 million, which reduced the Company’s $150 million
CIT
GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES – NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
maximum potential indemnity obligation to Ocwen. On August 12, 2016, Ocwen filed a Demand for Arbitration against CIT alleging that CIT failed to meet its contractual obligations to indemnify Ocwen for losses allegedly suffered in connection with the sale. Among other things, Ocwen alleges that CIT failed to perform its obligations under the sale agreement and breached its representations and warranties in the agreement. Because of the uncertainty in the ultimate resolution and estimated amount of the indemnification obligation, it is reasonably possible that the obligation could exceed the Company’s
recorded reserves.
Mortgage Servicing Consent Orders
As a result of CIT Group Inc.’s acquisition of OneWest Bank, CIT (as successor to IMB Holdco LLC) is subject to a Consent Order with the FRB related to residential mortgage servicing operations. The original consent order was entered into with IMB Holdco LLC and the Office of Thrift Supervision in April 2011. Following IMB Holdco’s conversion to a bank holding company the Consent Order was amended in March 2014 to name the FRB as the appropriate regulator to administer the Order. A similar Consent Order had been entered into with the OCC, but in July 2015, immediately prior to completion of CIT’s acquisition of OneWest Bank the OCC terminated its Consent Order. However, the FRB continued its Consent Order in place and oversight was transferred
to the Federal Reserve Bank New York and CIT succeeded to the Consent Order obligations. The FRB’s Consent Order remains outstanding although improvements required by the Consent Order have been implemented including the completion of an Independent Foreclosure Review in 2014, resulting in approximately $12.7 million of remediation payments being made payable to borrowers.
NOTE 14 — CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
CIT has an equity interest in Strategic Credit Partners Holdings LLC (the “JV”), a joint venture between CIT and TPG Special Situations Partners
(“TSSP”). CIT maintains an equity interest of 10% in the JV, and our investment was $7.5 million and $5.4 million at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively. Through September 30, 2017, loans of $241.1 million were sold to the joint venture. The JV extends credit in senior-secured, middle-market corporate term loans, and, in certain circumstances, is a participant to such loans. The JV may participate in corporate loans originated by CIT or other third party lenders. The JV may acquire
other types of loans, such as subordinate corporate loans, second lien loans, revolving loans, asset backed loans and real estate loans.
On July 10, 2017, CIT Northbridge Credit LLC (“Northbridge”) was formed. Northbridge is an asset-based-lending joint venture between CIT Bank, N.A. (“CIT”) and Allstate Insurance Company and its subsidiary (“Allstate”) that will extend credit in asset-based lending middle-market loans. CIT holds a 20% equity investment and acts as an investment advisor and servicer of the loan portfolio; Allstate is an 80% equity investor. At September 30, 2017
CIT’s investment was $1 million, with the expectation of additional investment as the joint venture grows. Management fees will be earned by CIT on loans under management. The joint venture is not consolidated and the investment is being accounted for using the equity method.
CIT invests in various trusts, partnerships, and limited liability corporations established in conjunction with structured financing transactions of equipment, power and infrastructure projects. CIT’s interests in these entities were entered into in the ordinary course of business. Other assets included approximately $266 million and $220 million at September 30, 2017 and December 31,
2016, respectively, of investments in non-consolidated entities relating to such transactions that are accounted for under the equity or cost methods.
The combination of investments in and loans to non-consolidated entities represents the Company’s maximum exposure to loss, as the Company does not provide guarantees or other forms of indemnification to non-consolidated entities.
CIT GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES – NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
NOTE 15 — BUSINESS SEGMENT INFORMATION
Segment Profit and Assets
The following table presents segment data related to continuing operations. Refer to Note 25 — Business Segment Information in our Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016 for further detailed information.
Segment Pre-tax Income (Loss) (dollars in millions)
During
the second quarter of 2017, we announced that we reached a definitive agreement to sell Nacco, and therefore transferred the portfolio to held for sale. As a result, approximately $65 million of goodwill within Commercial Banking, including foreign exchange translation adjustments, was transferred to held for sale.
CIT
GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES – NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
Note 17 - SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
On October 6, 2017, CIT announced that CIT Bank, N.A. has agreed to sell Financial Freedom, its reverse mortgage servicing business and operations, which is reported in discontinued operations, and a portfolio of approximately $900 million of reverse mortgage whole loans, including other real estate owned, which is reported in continuing operations (the “Financial Freedom Transaction”). The Financial Freedom Transaction is expected to close in the second quarter of 2018
and is subject to customary closing conditions, including the approval of certain government agencies and the consent of private investors related to the reverse mortgage servicing business. The agreement between the Company and the buyer contains representations and warranties, including but not limited to the conduct of the business, the servicing practices, and compliance with the servicing standards set by HUD and the FHA and by private investors, as well as covenants regarding the conduct of business both pre-closing and post-closing. The agreement contains certain indemnifications to allocate risks between the parties, subject to certain caps and limitations, including but not limited to the conduct of the business and compliance with servicing standards pre-closing. CIT also will retain certain pre-closing liabilities, including the cost of legacy and future litigation matters
related to pre-closing actions.
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
BACKGROUND
CIT
Group Inc., together with its subsidiaries (collectively “we”, “our”, “CIT” or the “Company”), has provided financial solutions to its clients since its formation in 1908. We provide financing, leasing and advisory services principally to middle market companies in a wide variety of industries, primarily in North America. CIT is a bank holding company (“BHC”) and a financial holding company (“FHC”). CIT provides a full range of banking and related services to commercial and individual customers through its bank subsidiary, CIT Bank, National Association, a national banking association (“CIT Bank” or “CIT Bank, N.A.”), which includes 70 branches located in Southern California, and its online bank, bankoncit.com, and through other offices in the U.S. and select international locations.
CIT
is regulated by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (“FRB”) and the Federal Reserve Bank of New York (“FRBNY”) under the U.S. Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended. CIT Bank, N.A. is regulated by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, U.S. Department of the Treasury (“OCC”).
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (MD&A) and Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk contain financial terms that are relevant to our business and a Glossary of key terms is included at the end of Item 1. Business Overview in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016.
In various metrics, Management uses non-GAAP financial measures in its analysis of the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. These are non-GAAP measures and are not in accordance with, or a substitute for, GAAP. Presented in “Non-GAAP Financial Measurements” are reconciliations of non-GAAP measures to comparable measures in accordance with U.S. GAAP.
SUMMARY OF 2017 FINANCIAL RESULTS
The following table summarizes the Company’s results in accordance with GAAP as included in the Consolidated Statements of Income, for the quarters and nine months ended September
30, 2017 and 2016, and for the quarter ended June 30, 2017. In addition, we provide results that are not in accordance with GAAP, and are reconciled to GAAP in the "Non-GAAP Financial Measurements" section. Further detail on the 2017 noteworthy items is presented in tabular format further in this section, and prior year noteworthy items are reconciled in the "Non-GAAP Financial Measurements" section.
Income from continuing operations for the third quarter was up from the year-ago and prior quarters. Compared to the year-ago quarter, income from continuing operations excluding noteworthy items1 was up on lower operating expenses and a decline in the provision for credit losses, partially offset by a decline
in net finance revenue. Loans and leases were down, along with lower purchase accounting accretion, which contributed to the decline in net finance revenue. Compared to the prior quarter, the increase was driven primarily by a decline in operating expenses and a lower effective tax rate, partially offset by a decline in net finance revenue and an increase in the provision for credit losses.
As presented above, net income of $220 million was up from the year-ago and prior quarters, while net income excluding noteworthy items2 for the third quarter of $138 million, or $1.01 per diluted common share, was down from the year-ago quarter, but above the prior quarter results. The decline
from the year-ago quarter reflected the Commercial Air results in discontinued operations in that quarter. Net income trends generally followed the trends for continuing operations compared to the prior quarter.
In the second quarter, we completed the sale of Commercial Air, which was a key driver of income from discontinued operations. We redeployed funds received from the sale and from the issuance of $325 million of preferred stock to repurchase $5.8 billion of unsecured borrowings through a debt tender offer and early redemptions (see Funding and Liquidity and Note 6 — Borrowings in Item 1. Consolidated Financial Statements) and to repurchase of $3.3 billion of common shares through a common equity tender offer, open market purchases, and an accelerated stock repurchase program ("ASR")
(see Capital and Note 9 — Stockholders' Equity in Item 1. Consolidated Financial Statements). We also entered into a definitive agreement to sell our European rail leasing business ("Nacco"), as we further simplify our business.
On October 6, 2017, CIT Bank entered into a definitive agreement to sell the Financial Freedom business, along with our reverse mortgage loan portfolio and certain other real estate owned assets reported in continuing operations and serviced by Financial Freedom (the "Financial Freedom Transaction"). The Financial Freedom Transaction is expected to close in the second quarter of 2018 and is subject to certain regulatory and investor approvals and other customary closing conditions. See Notes
1, 2, 3, and 17 in Item 1. Financial Information.
We continued our capital actions and further reduced our common shares outstanding, and completed a $0.8 billion debt tender offer. Third quarter results were impacted by several noteworthy items, including a deferred tax benefit from a restructuring of an international legal entity, loss on debt extinguishments and various charge-offs and impairments on reverse mortgage assets associated with the Financial Freedom Transaction. These noteworthy items are presented in a forthcoming table.
The increase in income per diluted share also reflects a decline in the average number of diluted common shares outstanding, primarily driven by significant share repurchases in the current and prior quarters.
1. Income
from continuing operations excluding noteworthy items is a non-GAAP measure; see “Non-GAAP Financial Measurements” for a reconciliation of non-GAAP to GAAP financial information.
2 Net income excluding noteworthy items is a non-GAAP measure; see “Non-GAAP Financial Measurements” for a reconciliation of non-GAAP to GAAP financial information.
The
following table reflects the reconciliation of income from continuing operations and net income excluding noteworthy items for the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2017, to our results in accordance with GAAP.
Noteworthy
Adjustments to 2017 Results (dollars in millions, except per share amounts)
Strategic
tax item - restructuring of an international legal entity
(140.4
)
(1.03
)
(140.4
)
(0.81
)
(140.4
)
(1.03
)
(140.4
)
(0.81
)
Debt
extinguishment costs related to the tender of $0.8 billion in unsecured debt
33.2
0.24
33.2
0.19
33.2
0.24
33.2
0.19
Financial
Freedom Transaction, impairments on reverse mortgage-related assets
16.4
0.12
16.4
0.09
16.4
0.12
16.4
0.09
Financial
Freedom Transaction, reverse mortgage charge-offs on loans transferred to HFS
9.5
0.07
9.5
0.05
9.5
0.07
9.5
0.05
Suspended
depreciation benefits related to the European Rail business (Nacco) held for sale
(5.2
)
(0.04
)
(5.2
)
(0.03
)
(5.2
)
(0.04
)
(5.2
)
(0.03
)
Restructuring
charges
2.4
0.02
2.4
0.01
2.4
0.02
2.4
0.01
Financial
Freedom discontinued operations
—
—
—
—
2.3
0.02
2.3
0.01
Non-GAAP
Results
$
138.7
$
1.02
$
137.8
$
1.01
Second
Quarter Items
Debt
extinguishment costs related to the reduction of $5.8 billion in unsecured debt
—
—
99.6
0.57
—
—
99.6
0.57
Net
interest cost related to the elevated borrowings and cash balances for the period between the closing of the Commercial Air sale and the completion of liability management and capital actions
Excess
interest costs
—
—
14.5
0.08
—
—
14.5
0.08
Interest
on excess cash
—
—
(5.6
)
(0.03
)
—
—
(5.6
)
(0.03
)
Benefit
from the resolution of legacy tax items
—
—
(19.3
)
(0.11
)
—
—
(19.3
)
(0.11
)
Benefit
from a deferred tax asset recognition related to Nacco
—
—
(6.9
)
(0.04
)
—
—
(6.9
)
(0.04
)
Restructuring
charges
—
—
2.2
0.01
—
—
2.2
0.01
Gain
on the sale of Commercial Air
—
—
—
—
—
—
(99.7
)
(0.57
)
Net
benefit related to Financial Freedom due to a net release of the interest curtailment reserve and a reduction in the FDIC indemnification asset, partially offset by an impairment charge related to mortgage servicing rights
—
—
—
—
—
—
(12.4
)
(0.07
)
First
Quarter Items
Charge
related to a currency translation adjustment relating to international business exits
—
—
6.8
0.04
—
—
6.8
0.04
Restructuring
charges
—
—
10.4
0.06
—
—
10.4
0.06
Deferred
tax expense related to the restructuring of legal entities in preparation for the Commercial Air sale
—
—
14.0
0.08
—
—
14.0
0.08
Gain
on the sale of the TC-CIT joint venture
—
—
—
—
—
—
(13.0
)
(0.07
)
Secured
debt extinguishment costs
—
—
—
—
—
—
34.0
0.20
Suspended
depreciation benefits related to the Commercial Air business
—
—
—
—
—
—
(69.0
)
(0.40
)
Non-GAAP
Results
$
373.8
$
2.15
$
430.0
$
2.47
DISCONTINUED
OPERATIONS
Discontinued operations at the end of the third quarter was comprised of Financial Freedom, our reverse mortgage servicing business and Business Air. In October, we announced an agreement to sell Financial Freedom.
The Financial Freedom Transaction, includes all the operations of the Financial Freedom business, including mortgage servicing rights, related servicing assets and liabilities as well as reverse mortgage loans and related secured borrowings. The Financial Freedom Transaction also includes approximately $862 million of reverse mortgage whole loans and $25 million of other real estate owned assets that are within continuing operations. Continuing operations pretax results for the quarter ended September 30, 2017 were impacted
by approximately $42 million of charges, mostly impacting the provision for credit losses and other non-interest income, associated with the announced sale of the reverse mortgage portfolio in connection with the Financial Freedom Transaction. At closing, CIT anticipates it will recognize a pre-tax net gain in continuing operations,
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis and Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk 61
currently
estimated to be approximately $25 million to $35 million. These amounts are prior to any incremental indemnification liabilities the Company may record. The transaction is expected to close in the second quarter of 2018, and is subject to certain regulatory approvals and the consent of investors related to the mortgage servicing business, along with other customary closing conditions as further described in Note 17 - Subsequent Events in Item 1. Financial Information. As discussed in the next section, Net Finance Revenue, the sale of the reverse mortgage whole loans will lower our revenue and margin as these had higher yields, but, the sale of Financial Freedom and this mortgage portfolio is a significant step in simplifying CIT, reducing future
risks and enabling us to focus on our core franchises.
The loss from discontinued operations (after taxes) for the quarter ended September 30, 2017 was $3 million, primarily driven by an increase in the servicing-related contingent liability in Financial Freedom. Discontinued operations reported an after tax income of $37 million in the year-ago quarter, driven by income from Commercial Air, and income of $116 million in the prior quarter, reflecting the gain on sale of Commercial Air. We completed the sale of our Commercial Air business in April 2017 for $10.4 billion and recorded a pre-tax gain of $146 million in the second quarter. Discontinued operations after tax income totaled $214 million
and $51 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively.
See Note 2 — Discontinued Operations in Item 1. Financial Information for further details on the business and condensed balance sheets and income statements, Note 13 - Contingencies for a discussion related to the Financial Freedom servicing business, and Item 4. Controls and Procedures for evaluation of disclosure controls regarding the Home Equity Conversion Mortgages (“HECM”)
interest curtailment reserve.
Unless specifically noted, the discussions and data presented throughout the following sections reflect CIT balances on a continuing operations basis.
Results From Continuing Operations:
NET FINANCE REVENUE
Net Finance Revenue3 ("NFR") and Net Finance Margin3
("NFM") are key metrics used by management to measure the profitability of our earning assets. NFR includes interest and yield-related fee income on our loans and capital leases, rental income on our operating lease equipment, and interest and dividend income on cash and investments, less funding costs and depreciation, maintenance and other operating lease expenses from our operating lease equipment. Since operating lease equipment is approximately 17% of average earning assets3 ("AEA") for the quarter ended September 30, 2017, NFM is a more appropriate metric for CIT than net interest margin (“NIM”) (a common metric used by other BHCs), as NIM does not fully reflect the earnings of our portfolio because it includes the impact of debt costs
on all our assets but excludes the net operating lease revenue3 (rental income less depreciation and maintenance and other operating lease expenses) from operating leases.
3 Net finance revenue, net finance margin, net operating lease revenue and average earnings assets, and respective amounts excluding noteworthy items are non-GAAP measures. See “Non-GAAP Measurements” for reconciliation of non-GAAP to GAAP financial information.
Average
earning assets ("AEA"), excluding noteworthy items(1)
$
45,454.2
$
46,989.8
$
47,728.7
$
46,291.7
$
47,900.0
Net
finance margin, excluding noteworthy items(1)
3.46
%
3.44
%
3.51
%
3.49
%
3.60
%
(1)
NFR,
NFM and AEA, and amounts excluding noteworthy items, are non-GAAP measures; see “Non-GAAP Financial Measurements” sections for a reconciliation of non-GAAP to GAAP financial information.
NFR increased $11 million compared to the prior quarter. NFR in the current quarter includes $8 million in suspended depreciation expense on rail assets held for sale. NFR in the prior quarter included $23 million in interest expense on approximately $5.8 billion of unsecured borrowings that previously was allocated to discontinued operations but was recorded in continuing operations following the Commercial Air sale on April 4, 2017, until the redemption of that debt later in the quarter. Partially offsetting that cost was $9 million in interest income related to the elevated cash balances for the period between the closing
of the Commercial Air sale and the related liability management and capital actions. Excluding these noteworthy items, NFR declined $11 million from the prior quarter, as higher interest income on loans and investment securities was more than offset by lower purchase accounting accretion ("PAA") and higher negative income associated with the indemnification asset.
Compared to the year-ago quarter, NFR excluding the noteworthy items4 decreased $26 million. The decrease in NFR primarily reflected $19 million of lower PAA, an increase of $10 million of negative income associated with the indemnification asset and lower gross yields in Rail, partially offset by higher earnings on the investment securities portfolio.
Net
finance margin excluding noteworthy items4 increased 2 basis points compared to the prior quarter. The increase in net finance margin reflects an increase in interest income on loans and investment securities and the mix of earning assets offset by a reduction in purchase accounting accretion and higher negative income associated with the indemnification asset and lower net rental income in Rail. Compared to the year-ago quarter, net finance margin decreased 5 basis points reflecting the noted drivers of the decrease in net finance revenue, partially offset by an increase in yields on loans and a shift from interest bearing deposits to investment securities.
Given the anticipated impact of the Financial Freedom Transaction, as discussed below, continued run-off of the remaining PAA, and lower rail lease renewal
rates, we expect net finance margin to trend lower in the fourth quarter, as these factors are expected to be only partially offset by an increase in income on investment securities and benefits from liability management actions.
AEA decreased from the prior quarter, which reflected elevated cash balances in continuing operations for the period between the closing of the Commercial Air sale and the related liability management and capital actions. Excluding the elevated cash balances in the prior quarter, AEA was down reflecting a decline in cash, partially offset by an increase in the investment portfolio. Compared to the year-ago quarter, AEA excluding noteworthy items4 declined reflecting a decline in loans in the Commercial Finance division of Commercial Banking along with run-off in NSP and the LCM portfolios
in Consumer Banking, partially offset by growth in the other Commercial Banking divisions.
4 Net finance revenue, net finance margin, net operating lease revenue and average earnings assets, and respective amounts excluding noteworthy items are non-GAAP measures. See “Non-GAAP Measurements” for reconciliation of non-GAAP to GAAP financial information.
Item 2. Management’s
Discussion and Analysis and Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk 63
The following table includes average balances from revenue generating assets along with the respective revenues, and average balances of deposits and borrowings along with the respective interest expenses.
Average
Balances and Rates(1) for the Quarters Ended (dollars in millions)
Loans
(including held for sale and credit balances of factoring clients)
27,793.1
417.1
6.00
%
28,257.0
431.0
6.10
%
30,239.3
448.1
5.93
%
Operating
lease equipment, net (including held for sale)(3)
7,797.6
123.3
6.33
%
7,612.2
120.5
6.33
%
7,335.1
130.8
7.13
%
Indemnification
assets
193.3
(13.6
)
(28.14
)%
280.0
(9.7
)
(13.86
)%
374.2
(4.3
)
(4.49
)%
Average
earning assets(2)
$
45,454.2
577.3
5.08
%
$
50,675.8
598.7
4.73
%
$
47,728.7
606.5
5.08
%
Interest-bearing
deposits
$
28,820.2
$
92.6
1.29
%
$
30,222.9
$
94.6
1.25
%
$
31,732.9
$
99.4
1.25
%
Borrowings(4)
8,591.6
84.1
3.92
%
10,702.5
114.6
4.28
%
15,221.7
88.8
2.33
%
Total
interest-bearing liabilities
$
37,411.8
176.7
1.89
%
$
40,925.4
209.2
2.04
%
$
46,954.6
188.2
1.60
%
NFR
and NFM
$
400.6
3.53
%
$
389.5
3.07
%
$
418.3
3.51
%
(1)
Average
rates are impacted by purchase accounting accretion and amortization.
(2)
Higher average balance and associated revenues on interest bearing deposits for the quarter ended September 30, 2017, reflect the additional cash from the Commercial Air sale, as discussed earlier. As noted earlier, the additional interest earned on the cash was approximately $9 million, and the average balance was increased by approximately $3.7 billion.
(3)
Operating
lease rental income is a significant source of revenue; therefore, we have presented the rental revenues net of depreciation and net of maintenance and other operating lease expenses.
(4)
See the discussion above on the lower average balance and higher rate and table for impact excluding certain noteworthy items.
Revenues generated on our deposits and investments are indicative of the generally low interest rate environment. Higher average balance and associated revenues on interest bearing deposits in the quarter ended June
30, 2017 reflect the additional cash from the Commercial Air sale, as discussed earlier, whereas the third quarter balance reflects the deployment of that cash, decreasing the average balance. The average balance and revenues has increased in investments, reflecting our strategy to grow that portfolio. The returns may fluctuate depending on the composition of the investments, interest rates and credit spreads. The increase in rates earned on our loan portfolio from the year-ago quarter reflects the impact of three 25 basis point increases in the Federal Funds interest rate since December 2016, the mix of loans, as well as changes in purchase accounting accretion and prepayment benefits. The decline from the prior quarter reflects lower purchase accounting accretion.
Interest expense was down in the current quarter, reflecting lower balances. Higher interest expense on borrowings
in the second quarter reflect the timing of the Commercial Air sale and the completion of the liability management actions discussed earlier.
The following table presents disaggregated quarter-over-quarter changes in net interest revenue and operating lease margins as presented in the preceding tables between volume (level of lending or borrowing) and rate (rates charged customers or incurred on borrowings). Volume change is calculated as change in volume times the previous rate, while rate change is change in rate times the previous volume. The rate/volume change, change in rate times change in volume, is allocated between volume change and rate change at the ratio each component bears to the absolute value of their total.
These proportions will fluctuate in the future depending upon our funding activities. The change from the prior periods reflects the completion of the unsecured debt redemptions and tender offer during the 2017 third quarter ($0.8 billion) and second quarter ($5.8 billion).
Item 2. Management’s
Discussion and Analysis and Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk 65
From
time to time, repayments of debt impact the month end average balances. In the current quarter, the average rate would have approximated 5.07% adjusting for the repayment of $800 million at the end of September 2017.
(2)
Balance includes interest expense related to facility fees and amortization of deferred costs on unused portions of credit facilities, including the Revolving Credit Facility and total return swaps. Amount for the quarter ended September 30, 2016, was reduced by capitalized interest on aircraft pre-delivery deposits and included in the amount allocated to discontinued operations.
(3)
For
the quarter ended September 30, 2016, the interest expense presented represented only the interest expense of continuing operations, and excluded interest expense of discontinued operation.
The change in mix of our deposits reflects our strategy to reduce the percentage of time deposits relative to total deposits. While we have been increasing non-maturity deposits, the decrease in the current quarter in money market and sweep accounts represents a reduction in higher cost accounts in our brokered and commercial channels. The overall cost increased modestly from the prior quarter reflecting an increase in the average savings account rate offset by a reduction in brokered and commercial deposits. See Funding and Liquidity section for a table that reflects deposits by
channel.
The following table reflects our total deposit base, interest bearing and non-interest bearing deposits, and related rate:
Total
Deposits — Average Balances and Rates for the Quarters Ended (dollars in millions)
Deposits
and borrowings are also discussed in Funding and Liquidity. See Select Financial Data (Average Balances) section for more information on borrowing rates.
Gross
yields (interest income plus rental income on operating leases as a % of AEA) in Commercial Banking were up from the year-ago quarter in each of the divisions except Rail. The gross yield for all four divisions declined compared to the prior quarter. The Commercial Finance increase in gross yields from the year-ago quarter was primarily driven by the benefit of higher short-term interest rates, partially offset by a decline in PAA, which also drove the division’s decrease from the prior quarter. The Real Estate Finance gross yield improved from the year-ago quarter driven by the benefit of higher short term interest rates that offset lower purchase accounting accretion. The gross yield declined slightly from the prior quarter which included prepayment fees on a single transaction.
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis and Item 3. Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk 67
Gross yields in Rail were lower from the year-ago and prior quarters, as lease rates continued to re-price lower on average across the North American portfolio. Gross yields in Business Capital were down slightly from the prior quarter, and up from the year-ago quarter due to asset mix.
Consumer Banking gross yields were down, impacted by lower purchase accounting accretion on mortgage loans in LCM. The decline also reflects higher
amounts of negative interest income associated with the indemnification asset. The negative interest income on the indemnification asset increased to $14 million this quarter from $10 million last quarter and $4 million in the year ago quarter, due to a decline in expected reimbursable losses under the loss share agreement reflecting better than expected credit performance of the covered loans. We expect the negative interest income to increase to around $16 million in the last quarter of 2017. While we expect the yield to remain negative, the level can increase or decrease as the indemnification asset amortizes over the remaining contract period, which expires in March 2019.
The reverse mortgages related to the Financial Freedom Transaction in LCM earn approximately $20 million of interest
income per quarter, approximately $5 million of which is from PAA and implying an average yield of 9% to 10%. The PAA related to these assets ceased accreting at the end of the quarter upon the transfer of the reverse mortgage loans to held for sale. As a result, we expect interest income to decline approximately $5 million in the fourth quarter from lower PAA on the reverse mortgage loans in held for sale and then by an additional $15 million after the Financial Freedom Transaction closes.
As of September 30, 2017, the remaining accretable PAA was approximately $770 million, of which approximately $110 million related to Commercial Banking and approximately $660 million
related to Consumer Banking. This compares to approximately $1 billion of remaining accretable PAA as of June 30, 2017, of which approximately $125 million related to Commercial Banking and approximately $910 million related to Consumer Banking. About half of the remaining accretable PAA in Commercial Banking is expected to be realized in the next four quarters, while the remaining accretable PAA in Consumer Banking is expected to run off at a rate consistent with the run-off of the underlying mortgages. When a loan prepays, the loan’s remaining PAA is accelerated into interest income, which could result in fluctuations from quarter to quarter (see footnote 1 to the following table).
The Consumer Banking accretable PAA balance at September 30, 2017, does not include the PAA on the
reverse mortgage loan portfolio that was transferred to held for sale related to the Financial Freedom Transaction, and recognition of PAA accretion on those loans ceased upon transfer to held for sale at the end of the quarter. The PAA associated with the reverse mortgage loans was $213 million, and as indicated above, PAA accretion for the current quarter for those loans was $5 million.
The following table displays PAA accretion by segment and division for both interest income and interest expense.
Purchase
Accounting Accretion (PAA) (dollars in millions)
Included
in the above are accelerated recognition of approximately $15.3 million, $21.0 million and $16.5 million for the quarters ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 and June 30, 2017, respectively.
(2)
Debt and deposits acquired in the OneWest Bank acquisition were recorded at a net premium, therefore
the purchase accounting accretion of that adjustment decreases interest expense.
Average
operating lease equipment, including amounts held for sale
$
7,797.6
$
7,612.2
$
7,335.1
$
7,637.1
$
7,171.5
Net
operating lease revenue is generated principally by Rail with the remaining amount from Business Capital, both divisions of Commercial Banking. Net operating lease revenue was down from the year-ago quarter, reflecting continued downward pressures on renewal rates in Rail. Net operating lease revenue increased from the prior quarter due to suspended depreciation of $8 million related to the pending sale of our European Rail business, Nacco. Increasing the depreciation in the current quarter for the amount suspended would have decreased the current quarter net operating lease revenue, and the rate to 5.92%. Suspended depreciation is discussed further below.
Railcar utilization, including commitments to lease, was steady at approximately 95%, as strength in sand car demand offset continued weakness in coal car utilization, compared to
the prior and year-ago quarters. Rail lease rates in the current quarter continued to price down compared to the rates on expiring leases, reflecting excess capacity in the market. We continue to expect downward pressure, with re-pricing down on average of 20%-30% into 2018, reflecting market conditions and pressure from tank car lease rates.
Depreciation is recognized on railcars and other operating lease equipment. Depreciation was up from the year-ago quarter driven by growth in the non-rail portfolio, which is depreciated over a shorter time span. Depreciation was down compared to the prior quarter due to rail assets transferred to held for sale. Once a long-lived asset is classified as assets held for sale, depreciation expense is no longer recognized, and the asset is evaluated for impairment with any such charge recorded in other income, of which none was recorded in the
quarter on these assets. Consequently, net operating lease revenue includes rental income on operating lease equipment classified as assets held for sale, but there is no related depreciation expense. Suspended depreciation on operating lease equipment in assets held for sale totaled $8 million for the current quarter, with none in the prior quarters presented. The 2017 fourth quarter is expected to have suspended depreciation at a similar level. See “Expenses — Depreciation on operating lease equipment” for additional information.
Maintenance and other operating lease expenses relates to the rail portfolio. The increase from the year-ago and prior quarters reflected increased maintenance, freight and storage costs in Rail due to growth in the portfolio.
Upon
emergence from bankruptcy in 2009, CIT applied Fresh Start Accounting (“FSA”) in accordance with GAAP. The most significant remaining discount at September 30, 2017 related to operating lease equipment ($1.2 billion related to rail operating lease equipment). The discount on the operating lease equipment was, in effect, an impairment of the operating lease equipment upon emergence from bankruptcy, as the assets were recorded at their fair value, which was less than their carrying value. The recording of the FSA adjustment reduced the asset balances subject to depreciation and thus decreases depreciation expense over the remaining useful life of the operating lease equipment or until it is sold.
CREDIT
METRICS
Credit metrics remain stable and continue to reflect a favorable credit environment.
Non-accrual loans totaled $265 million (0.93% of loans), compared to $257 million (0.88%) at June 30, 2017, and $279 million (0.94%) at December 31, 2016.
The
provision for credit losses reflects loss adjustments related to loans recorded at amortized cost, off-balance sheet commitments and related reimbursements under indemnification agreements. The provision for credit losses was $30 million, up from the prior quarter provision of $4 million and down from the prior year quarter provision of $45 million. Half of the
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis and Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk 69
current quarter provision resulted from charge-offs in the reverse mortgage portfolio transferred to held for sale. Excluding this noteworthy item the provision was $15 million, below the normalized run rate reflecting lower loan balances. The provision in the prior quarter was also below the normalized run rate and principally the result of lower loan balances and net credit benefits from changes in portfolio mix in Commercial Banking. The prior year quarter included an increase in reserves related to the maritime portfolio.
Net charge-offs were $42 million (0.58% of average loans) in the current quarter, up from
$28 million (0.38%) in the prior quarter and from $21 million (0.28%) in the year-ago quarter. The increase was driven by $20 million of charge-offs in the reverse mortgage portfolio, primarily due to the transfer of that portfolio to held for sale, as part of the Financial Freedom Transaction. Absent this, net charge-offs were essentially flat with the prior quarter. Net charge-offs are presented in a table and discussed later in this section.
The following table presents detail on our allowance for loan losses, including charge-offs and recoveries and provides summarized components of the provision and allowance:
Allowance
for loan losses as a percentage of total loans
1.47
%
1.47
%
1.39
%
Allowance
for loan losses as a percent of loans/Commercial
1.73
%
1.78
%
1.74
%
(1)
The
provision for credit losses includes amounts related to reserves on unfunded loan commitments and letters of credit, and for deferred purchase agreements, which are reflected in other liabilities. The items included in other liabilities totaled $44 million, $49 million and $48 million at September 30, 2017, June 30, 2017 and September 30, 2016, respectively. “Other” also includes allowance for loan losses associated with loan sales and foreign currency translations.
(2)
Charge-offs
for the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2017 included approximately $20 million related to reverse mortgage loans transferred from AHFI to AHFS.
The allowance for loan losses was $419.5 million (1.47% of loans, 1.68% excluding loans subject to loss sharing agreements with the FDIC) at September 30, 2017, compared to $426.0 million (1.47% of loans, 1.70% excluding loans subject to loss sharing agreements with the FDIC) at June 30,
2017 and $415.0 million (1.39% of loans, 1.63% excluding loans subject to loss sharing agreements with the FDIC) at September 30, 2016. The decrease in the allowance for loan losses from the prior quarter was principally the result of net credit benefits from changes in portfolio mix in Commercial Banking. The decrease from the prior quarter also reflects the charge-off of previously established specific reserves on impaired loans. The increase in the allowance for loan losses from the year-ago quarter reflects reserve build resulting from purchase accounting accretion on loans acquired from OneWest Bank.
Refer to Note 3 —
Loans for details regarding the unpaid principal balance, carrying value and allowance for loan losses related to PCI loans.
Charge-offs
for the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2017 included approximately $20 million related to reverse mortgage loans transferred to assets held for sale.
The increases in net charge-offs compared to the year-ago and prior quarters resulted primarily from charge-offs of $20 million from the transfer of the reverse mortgage loan portfolio in Consumer Banking to held for sale. In addition, the decline in Commercial Banking year to date was driven by lower charge-offs in the energy portfolio.
The tables below present information on non-accruing loans, which includes loans in AHFS for each period, and when added to OREO and other repossessed assets, sums to non-performing assets. PCI loans are excluded from these tables
as they are written down at acquisition to their fair value using an estimate of cashflows deemed to be collectible. Accordingly, such loans are no longer classified as past due or non-accrual even though they may be contractually past due because we expect to fully collect the new carrying values of these loans.
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis and Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk 71
Factored
receivables within our Business Capital division do not accrue interest and therefore are not considered within non-accrual loan balances but are considered for credit provisioning purposes.
(2)
Excludes TDR loans in a trial modification period of $12.8 million and $39.5 million at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively. Refer to Note 3 — Loans for further details.
NM
— Not meaningful; Non-accrual loans include loans held for sale. All of NSP non-accrual loans reflected loans held for sale; since there was no portfolio loans, no % is displayed.
Non-accrual loans were up from the prior quarter and down from December 31, 2016, primarily due to an increase in Commercial Finance partially offset by decreases in Real Estate Finance and Business Capital.
Approximately 61% of our non-accrual accounts were paying currently compared to 75% at December 31, 2016. Our impaired loan carrying value (including PAA discount and charge-offs)
to estimated outstanding unpaid principal balances approximated 94% compared to 91% at December 31, 2016. For this purpose, impaired loans are comprised principally of non-accrual loans over $500,000 and troubled debt restructurings (“TDRs”).
Interest
revenue that would have been earned at original terms
$
18.7
$
3.3
$
22.0
$
20.3
$
4.3
$
24.6
Less:
Interest recorded
(4.2
)
(1.5
)
(5.7
)
(3.4
)
(0.3
)
(3.7
)
Foregone
interest revenue
$
14.5
$
1.8
$
16.3
$
16.9
$
4.0
$
20.9
The
Company periodically modifies the terms of loans in response to borrowers’ difficulties. Modifications that include a financial concession to the borrower, which otherwise would not have been considered, are accounted for as TDRs. For those accounts that were modified but not considered to be TDRs, it was determined that no concessions had been granted by CIT to the borrower. Borrower compliance with the modified terms is the primary measurement that we use to determine the success of these programs.
Excludes
TDR loans in a trial modification period of $12.8 million and $39.5 million at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively. Refer to Note 3 — Loans for further details.
(2)
Table depicts the predominant element of each modification, which may contain several of the characteristics listed.
PCI loans, TDRs and other credit quality information is included in Note
3 — Loans in Item 1. Consolidated Financial Statements.
NON-INTEREST INCOME
As presented in the following table, Non-interest Income includes Rental Income on Operating Leases and Other Non-Interest Income. The following discussion is on a consolidated basis; Non-interest income is also discussed in each of the individual segments in Results By Business Segment.
Net
(losses) gains on derivatives and foreign currency exchange
0.9
(1.8
)
(16.1
)
(12.2
)
3.9
Impairment
on assets
(21.5
)
(1.9
)
(3.5
)
(25.1
)
(36.6
)
Other
revenues
8.8
8.6
15.5
35.8
63.4
Total
other non-interest income
63.3
84.6
83.6
227.0
268.2
Total
other non-interest income, excluding noteworthy items(1)
$
90.1
$
84.6
$
78.6
$
261.9
$
254.0
Total
non-interest income
$
315.6
$
335.8
$
337.9
$
981.8
$
1,047.6
(1)
Total non-interest income, excluding noteworthy items are non-GAAP balances, see reconciliations to GAAP balance in Non-GAAP Financial Measurements.
Rental income on operating leases from equipment we lease is generated in the Rail and Business Capital divisions in the Commercial Banking segment and recognized principally on a straight line basis over the lease term. Rental income is discussed in “Net Finance Revenues” and “Results by Business Segment”. See also our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016,
Note 6 — Operating Lease Equipment in Item 8 Financial Statements and Supplementary Data for information on operating leases.
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis and Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk 73
Fee
revenues, which include items generated by our business activities such as fees on lines and letters of credit, capital markets-related fees, agent and advisory fees and servicing fees, remained fairly steady and are mainly driven by our Commercial Banking segment.
Factoring commissions were up relative to the prior quarter, reflecting the seasonal increase in volume and were down compared to the year-ago quarter, despite an increase in factoring volumes as a reduction in the mix of higher risk receivables put downward pressure on pricing. Factoring volume was $7.2 billion for the current quarter, up from $6.7 billion in the year-ago quarter, and from $5.7 billion last quarter.
Gains
on sales of leasing equipment resulted from $43 million of equipment sales in the current quarter, $84 million in the year-ago quarter, and $65 million in the prior quarter. In each of the quarters, the gains were driven by sales of rail equipment and other types of equipment in Business Capital and NSP. Gains as a percentage of equipment sold increased from the year-ago and prior quarters and will vary based on the type and age of equipment sold. See table entitled Equipment Sales in the Loans and Leases section that displays amounts sold by segment.
Gains on loan and portfolio sales resulted from $56
million of sales in the current quarter, $202 million in the year-ago quarter, and $146 million in the prior quarter. Gains and losses vary based on the underlying loan and market conditions. See table entitled Loan and Portfolio Sales in the Loans and Leases section that displays amounts sold by segment.
Gains on investments include changes in value of mortgage-backed securities, which drove the increase from the prior quarter, sales of equity investments that were received as part of a lending transaction or, in some cases, a workout situation and gains on the sale of securities.
Gain
(loss) on OREO sales reflect sales and adjustments to the carrying value of real estate owned assets, and primarily relate to foreclosures in the mortgage portfolios in the Consumer Banking segment. The current quarter loss is due to $5 million of impairments recorded on OREO on reverse mortgages to be sold related to the Financial Freedom Transaction.
Net (losses) gains on derivatives and foreign currency exchange includes transactional foreign currency movements, realization of currency translation adjustments ("CTA") amounts from accumulated other comprehensive loss due to translation adjustments related to the liquidating portfolios and the valuation of the derivatives within the TRS.
Foreign currency movements and other exposures
resulted in net losses of $1 million, $4 million and $2 million for the current quarter, year-ago quarter and prior quarter, respectively. On a gross basis, transactional foreign currency movements resulted in a gain of $6 million in the current quarter, minor gains and losses in the year-ago quarter, and a gain of $18 million in the prior quarter. The impact of these transactional foreign currency movements in the current quarter, year-ago quarter and prior quarter, respectively, was offset by a loss of $7 million, gain of $4 million and loss of $20 million, on derivatives that economically hedge foreign
currency movements and other exposures.
The valuation of the derivatives within the TRS resulted in a loss of $1 million in the current quarter, no movement in the prior quarter and a loss of $20 million in the prior year quarter, primarily due to the narrowing or widening of credit spread inputs to the fair value model. The decrease in the change in valuation in the current quarter compared to the prior year quarter is the result of the termination of the Canadian TRS in December 2016.
For additional information on the impact of derivatives on the income statement, refer to Note 7 — Derivative Financial Instruments in Item 1. Financial Information.
Impairment
on assets in the current quarter reflects the agreement to sell the reverse mortgage portfolio as part of the Financial Freedom Transaction, including a $9 million impairment on reverse mortgage related assets and a $12 million write-down related to the reverse mortgage loan portfolio in held for sale. (See Other Expenses for related discussion on depreciation on operating lease equipment.)
Other revenues included items that are more episodic in nature, such as gains on work-out related claims, proceeds received in excess of carrying value on non-accrual accounts held for sale, which were repaid or had another workout resolution, insurance proceeds in excess of carrying value on damaged leased equipment, and income from joint ventures. Other revenue in the year-ago quarter included a noteworthy
item of a $5 million net gain from the sale of loans related to the IndyMac venture.
Operating
expenses, excluding restructuring costs and intangible asset amortization
(268.2
)
(286.0
)
(294.2
)
(844.8
)
(890.8
)
Intangible
asset amortization
(6.2
)
(6.2
)
(6.4
)
(18.6
)
(19.2
)
Restructuring
costs
(2.9
)
(3.4
)
(2.3
)
(21.1
)
(32.3
)
Total
operating expenses
(277.3
)
(295.6
)
(302.9
)
(884.5
)
(942.3
)
Loss
on debt extinguishment and deposit redemption
(53.5
)
(164.8
)
(5.2
)
(218.3
)
(9.2
)
Total
non-interest expenses
$
(459.8
)
$
(591.1
)
$
(431.6
)
$
(1,489.8
)
$
(1,298.9
)
Headcount
3,965
3,995
4,230
Operating
expenses excluding restructuring costs and intangible asset amortization as a % of AEA(1)
2.36
%
2.26
%
2.47
%
2.37
%
2.48
%
Net
efficiency ratio(2)
57.8
%
60.3
%
58.6
%
58.9
%
57.0
%
Operating
expenses excluding restructuring costs and intangible asset amortization and other noteworthy items as a % of adjusted AEA(1)
2.36
%
2.43
%
2.47
%
2.43
%
2.48
%
Net
Efficiency Ratio excluding noteworthy items(2)
55.5
%
58.6
%
59.2
%
57.3
%
57.5
%
(1)
Operating
expenses excluding restructuring costs and intangible asset amortization as a % of AEA is a non-GAAP measure; see “Non-GAAP Financial Measurements” for a reconciliation of non-GAAP to GAAP financial information.
(2)
Net efficiency ratio and net efficiency ratio adjusted are non-GAAP measurements used by management to measure operating expenses (before restructuring costs and intangible amortization) to the level of total net revenues. See “Non-GAAP Financial Measurements” for a reconciliation of non-GAAP to GAAP financial information and description of the calculation.
Depreciation on Operating Lease
Equipment
Depreciation on operating lease equipment is recognized on owned equipment over the lease term or estimated useful life of the asset. Depreciation expense is driven by rail equipment and smaller ticket equipment, such as office equipment, in the Rail and Business Capital divisions in Commercial Banking, respectively. Depreciation expense is also discussed in “Net Finance Revenue,” as it is a component of our asset margin. See “Non-Interest Income” for impairment charges on operating lease equipment classified as held for sale.
Maintenance and Other Operating Lease Expenses
Maintenance
and other operating lease expenses relates to equipment ownership and leasing costs associated with the Rail portfolio. Rail provides railcars primarily pursuant to full-service lease contracts under which Rail as lessor is responsible for railcar maintenance and repair. Maintenance expenses on railcars increased from the year-ago and prior quarters on the growing portfolio, with increased costs associated with end of lease railcar returns and higher Railroad Interchange repair expenses.
Operating Expenses
Operating expenses, excluding restructuring costs and intangible asset amortization were down from the prior quarter, driven primarily by lower compensation and benefits and lower insurance expenses,
partially offset by higher advertising and marketing costs, primarily in Consumer Banking. Compared to the year-ago quarter, operating expenses were down, reflecting lower employee costs, professional fees, FDIC insurance costs and other taxes, partially offset by higher advertising and marketing costs, primarily in Consumer Banking.
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis and Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk 75
We
remain on track to achieve our operating expense reduction target of $150 million by the end of 2018 through organizational alignment, technology and operations improvements and third party initiatives.
Operating Expenses reflect the following changes:
•
Compensation and benefits decreased from the prior and year-ago quarters, primarily reflecting the impact of fewer employees, resulting from business sales and other strategic initiatives.
•
Technology
costs decreased from the prior quarters due to the timing of anticipated costs.
•
Professional fees included legal and other professional fees, such as tax, audit, and consulting services. Professional fees were up slightly from the prior quarter, and down from the year-ago quarter, which included higher costs for strategic initiatives and OWB integration.
•
Insurance expenses decreased on lower FDIC costs, reflecting a decline in the insurance assessment base and improvements
in the assessment variables.
•
Net Occupancy expenses were relatively flat across the quarters.
•
Advertising and marketing expenses include costs associated with raising deposits and may fluctuate based on timing of marketing programs.
•
Intangible
asset amortization primarily results from intangible assets recorded in the OneWest Bank acquisition.
•
Restructuring costs primarily reflects strategic initiatives to reduce operating expenses and streamline our operations, which resulted in employee reductions compared to the year-ago period.
•
Other expenses include items such as travel and entertainment, office equipment and supplies and taxes (other than
income taxes, such as state sales tax, etc.), and from time to time includes settlement agreement costs, including OneWest Bank legacy matters.
Loss on Debt Extinguishments and Deposit Redemptions
The $54 million loss in the current quarter primarily related to the tender for $800 million of unsecured borrowings, while the $165 million loss in the prior quarter related to the tender and early redemptions of $5.8 billion of unsecured borrowings. In the year-ago quarter, we recognized debt extinguishment costs mostly associated with the early redemption of high-cost brokered deposits. See Note 6 — Borrowings in Item 1. Consolidated Financial Statements.
Effective
tax rate, before tax discrete items only(1)
18.0
%
35.2
%
30.6
%
30.2
%
46.0
%
Effective
tax rate, before noteworthy items(1)
28.4
%
34.4
%
25.6
%
31.2
%
45.0
%
(1)
Effective
tax rate excluding discrete items or noteworthy items are non-GAAP measures. See “Non-GAAP Measurements” for reconciliation of non-GAAP financial information.
In the Summary of 2017 Financial Results section we discussed and displayed noteworthy items that have impacted the comparability of the current quarter with the year-ago and prior quarters. The benefit for income taxes in the current quarter of $120 million included a $140 million deferred tax benefit from a restructuring of an international legal entity. The benefit for income taxes in the prior quarter of $32 million included $26 million in net benefits related to the resolution of certain legacy tax items and the agreement to sell Nacco. The provision for income taxes in the year-ago quarter of $55 million included a $16 million valuation allowance against the international deferred tax asset related to our operations in China. Excluding the
aforementioned tax noteworthy items and all other noteworthy items, the effective tax rate was 28%, compared to 34% in the prior quarter, and 26% in the year-ago quarter.
We also analyze our effective tax rate as impacted by tax discrete items only. The income tax (benefit) provision before discrete items was lower in the current quarter compared to the prior quarter and year-ago quarter, primarily driven by several favorable adjustments included
in the forecast annual effective tax rate used in the computation of the quarterly income tax expense (benefit). Excluding the discrete tax items, the actual effective tax rate in the current quarter was 18.0%. The year to date 2017 effective income tax rate is 30% before the impact of the discrete items.
The higher year-ago quarter and nine months ended period was primarily due to the impact of certain unfavorable tax adjustments, including certain international income that was subject to incremental tax in the U.S.
Included in the net discrete tax benefit of $138.4 million and $220.5 million for the current quarter and year to date was:
•
$140.4
million deferred tax benefit recorded in the current quarter related to the recognition of a $235 million deferred tax asset on an equity investment in a wholly-owned foreign subsidiary offset by a $95 million valuation allowance,
•
$19.3 million current tax benefit recorded in the prior quarter, including interest and penalties, related to legacy OneWest Bank matters including the release of a tax reserve upon the favorable resolution of an uncertain tax position and recognition of expected tax refunds,
•
$65.2 million
deferred tax benefit recorded in the prior quarter related to debt extinguishment costs,
•
$6.9 million deferred tax benefit recorded in the prior quarter related to the recognition of a deferred tax asset on the Company’s investment in Nacco, which is now categorized as “held for sale.”
•
$13.9 million in deferred tax expense recorded in the first quarter related to the restructuring of legal entities in preparation for the Commercial
Air sale, and
•
$2.6 million of miscellaneous other year to date net tax benefit items.
Included in the net discrete tax expense of $9.0 million and $1.6 million for the year-ago quarter and nine months period was:
•
$15.7 million deferred tax expense recorded in the year-ago quarter related to the establishment of valuation allowances against certain international net deferred tax assets due to our international platform rationalizations,
•
$13.9
million current tax benefit recorded in the prior year first quarter on the release of tax reserves, including interest and penalties, upon the resolution of uncertain tax positions in prior year non-U.S. income tax filings with the local tax authorities,
•
$0.2 million of miscellaneous net tax benefit items, of which $6.7 million miscellaneous net tax benefit items were recorded in the year-ago quarter.
We expect the 2017 global effective tax rate to be in the low 30% range, before discrete tax items and the tax effect of the debt extinguishment costs. Furthermore, cash income taxes paid will remain minimal until the
Company's NOL carry-forwards are fully utilized.
The Company had U.S. Federal net operating loss carry-forwards ("NOLs") of approximately $6.0 billion as of December 31, 2016. The Commercial Air transaction generated approximately $4.0 billion of taxable income, of which $3.6 billion is expected to be offset by NOLs and $0.4 billion is expected to be offset by a capital loss associated with realization of a deferred tax asset on an equity investment in a wholly-owned foreign subsidiary. Additionally, the transaction incurred minimal amount of U.S. federal and state cash taxes, after applying available tax credits. Of the remaining $2.4 billion of NOLs, approximately $1.3 billion represent pre-bankruptcy NOLs subject to an annual $265
million limitation.
The amount of future cash taxes will depend on the level of taxable income after utilization of the remaining NOLs, including the implications of the aforementioned limitation. Cash taxes were a net payment of $24.2 million and $37.9 million for the current quarter and nine months ended period, respectively, compared to a net payment of $14.0 million in the prior quarter, $56.3 million net refund in the year-ago quarter, and $49.9 million net refund in the year-ago nine months period.
See Note 11 - Income Taxes in Item 1. Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information, including deferred tax assets and specific tax discrete items.
Item 2. Management’s
Discussion and Analysis and Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk 77
CIT manages its business
and reports its financial results in three operating segments: Commercial Banking, Consumer Banking, and Non-Strategic Portfolios (“NSP”), and a non-operating segment, Corporate and Other.
Commercial Banking
Commercial Banking is comprised of four divisions: Commercial Finance, Rail, Real Estate Finance and Business Capital. Revenue is generated from interest earned on loans, rents on equipment leased, fees and other revenue from lending and leasing activities and banking services, along with capital markets transactions and commissions earned on factoring and related activities. A detailed description of the divisions is included at the end of Item 1. Business Overview in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2016.
Commercial Banking: Financial Data and Metrics (dollars in millions)
Commercial Banking pre-tax earnings decreased from the prior quarter, reflecting an increase in credit provisioning from an unusually low level in the prior quarter and lower NFR, which offset a decline in operating expenses. Pre-tax earnings increased relative to the year-ago quarter, reflecting lower credit costs and operating expenses, partially offset by a decrease in NFR.
AEA
consists primarily of loans and leases. Average loans and leases net of credit balances of factoring clients was $28.8 billion for the quarter ended September 30, 2017, essentially flat from the prior quarter as a reduction in Commercial Finance was mostly offset by an increase in Rail and Business Capital and down 2% from the year-ago quarter, reflecting a decline in Commercial Finance, partially offset by increases in all other divisions. The Commercial Finance decline reflects the impact of loan prepayments and sales.
New lending and leasing volume of $2.0 billion was essentially unchanged from the prior quarter, and down from the year-ago quarter as all divisions had decreases in volume, except Real Estate Finance.
Factored
volume of $7.2 billion was up 26% from the prior quarter due to seasonal trends and up 8% compared to the year-ago quarter, driven primarily by increased volume in the technology industry.
Rail average earning assets of $7.5 billion were up slightly from $7.4 billion in the prior quarter and $7.2 billion in the year-ago quarter. Rail car utilization in North American Rail was relatively flat at 95%. On June 30, 2017, we announced the sale of Nacco, our European rail leasing business, and transferred the portfolio to assets held for sale. Our portfolio includes approximately 135,000 railcars, of which approximately
14,500 are subject to the definitive sale agreement to sell Nacco, which is subject to regulatory approvals and is currently expected to close in the first quarter of 2018. At September 30, 2017, our North America portfolio had approximately 1,000 railcars on order from manufacturers, with deliveries scheduled through 2018. See Note 12 — Commitments in Item 1. Consolidated Financial Statements for further railcar manufacturer commitment data.
Highlights included:
▪
Net
finance revenue ("NFR") decreased from both the prior and the year-ago quarters primarily reflecting lower purchase accounting accretion and prepayment benefits in Commercial Finance and Real Estate Finance. The decrease from a year ago quarter also reflects the impact of lower earning assets in Commercial Finance. Net rental income was up slightly from both the prior quarter and the year-ago quarter, primarily from the benefit from the suspension of depreciation on the rail assets held for sale. Railcar utilization, including commitments to lease, was relatively unchanged at 95% from the prior and year-ago quarters. The excess capacity in the rail market and the weakness in the lease rates for tank cars carrying crude are, however, expected to continue the downward pressure on renewal rates.
▪
Net
Finance Margin ("NFM") was down compared to the prior quarter and year-ago quarter, reflecting lower purchase accounting accretion.
▪
Purchase accounting accretion totaled $22 million, $26 million and $37 million in the current, prior and year-ago quarters, respectively. Essentially all accretion benefited interest income, with a small amount decreasing interest expense. (Purchase accounting accretion is depicted in tabular form in the Net Finance Revenue section). The current quarter, prior and year-ago
quarters included $12 million, $12 million and $17 million, respectively, of PAA that was accelerated due to prepayments.
▪
Gross yields were down compared to the prior quarter, reflecting declines in Rail and lower PAA in Commercial Finance and Real Estate Finance. Gross yields were up compared to the year ago quarter as lower Rail rentals and lower Commercial Finance and Real Estate Finance purchase accounting accretion were offset by the impact of higher interest rates.
See Select Segment and Division Margin Metrics table in Net Finance
Revenue section for amounts of purchase accounting accretion and gross yields by division.
▪
Net operating lease revenue, which is a component of NFR, is driven primarily by the performance of our rail portfolio. Net operating lease revenue was up from the prior quarter as lower depreciation, due to suspended depreciation on railcars transferred to held for sale at the end of the second quarter, offset lower renewal lease rates. Once a long-lived asset is classified as assets held for sale, depreciation expense is no longer recognized, and the asset is evaluated for impairment with any such charge recorded in other income, of which none was recorded in the quarter
Item 2. Management’s
Discussion and Analysis and Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk 79
on these assets. Consequently, net operating lease revenue includes rental income on operating lease equipment classified as assets held for sale, but there is no related depreciation expense. Suspended depreciation on operating lease equipment in assets held for sale totaled $8 million for the current quarter, with no suspended depreciation in the prior periods. Excluding the suspended depreciation, the current quarter operating
lease margin would have declined to 5.92%, from 6.33% in the prior quarter. Rental rates declined as average lease renewal rates continued to re-price down due to excess capacity in the market. We expect this rate to fluctuate depending on the number and types of cars renewing, and while there are signs of stabilization in certain car types, such as sand cars, demand for energy-related coal and tank cars remains weak.
▪
Other non-interest income decreased from the year-ago quarter and prior quarter, reflecting the following:
▪
Factoring
commissions of $27 million were up from the prior quarter, reflecting the seasonal increase in volume and were down compared to the year-ago quarter, despite an increase in factoring volumes, as a reduction in the mix of higher risk receivables put downward pressure on pricing. Year to date, factoring commissions were $76 million, down from $79 million for the prior year.
▪
Gains on asset sales (including receivables, equipment and investments) totaled $16 million, compared to $21 million in the prior quarter and
$16 million in the year-ago quarter. The gains for the quarters were primarily driven by sales of rail cars. Year to date, gains totaled $51 million, up slightly from the prior year.
▪
Fee revenue is mainly driven by fees on lines of credit and letters of credit, capital markets-related fees, agent and advisory fees and banking related fees, including cash management and account fees. Fee revenue was $24 million in the current quarter, down slightly from $26 million in the prior quarter and $26 million in the year-ago
quarter. Year to date, fee revenue totaled $76 million, up slightly from $75 million in the prior year.
▪
The provision for credit losses in the current quarter totaled $11 million, compared to a slight benefit for credit losses in the prior quarter and $44 million in the year-ago quarter. The provision this quarter was principally the result of changes in portfolio mix but still remaining below a normalized run rate. The decline from the year-ago quarter was in the Commercial Finance and Business Capital divisions reflecting lower provision amounts for the
maritime sector and the Commercial Services business. Year to date, the provision for credit losses was down due to the decline in Commercial Finance and Business Capital divisions, driven by the maritime and the Commercial Services businesses discussed above.
▪
Net charge-offs were $22 million (0.39% of average loans), essentially flat with $22 million (0.38%) in the year-ago quarter and down from $27.0 million (0.48%) from the prior quarter. The decrease from the
year-ago quarter was driven by the Commercial Finance division, mostly in the energy portfolio. Year to date, net charge-offs were $76 million (0.45%) in 2017 and $88 million (0.51%) in 2016.
▪
Non-accrual loans were $241 million (1.06% of loans), compared to $229 million (1.03%) at June 30,
2017, and $251 million (1.11%) at December 31, 2016. The decrease from December 31, 2016 reflected a reduction in the Real Estate Finance division, while the increase from the prior quarter was in Commercial Finance.
▪
Operating expenses declined $8 million from the prior quarter and $24 million from the year ago quarter, primarily driven by tax reserve releases in the current quarter as well as lower employee related costs. Year to date, operating expenses decreased, reflecting
the impact of management expense initiatives.
Consumer Banking
Consumer Banking includes Retail Banking, Consumer Lending, and SBA Lending, which are grouped together for purposes of discussion as Other Consumer Banking, and Legacy Consumer Mortgages (“LCM”). A detailed description of the divisions is included at the end of Item 1. Business Overview in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016.
See our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2016, Note 1 — Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies and Note 5 — Indemnification Assets in Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data for accounting and detailed discussions.
Pretax
results for the quarter were impacted by approximately $42 million of charges, mostly impacting the provision for credit losses and other non-interest income, associated with the announced sale of the reverse mortgage portfolio in connection with the Financial Freedom Transaction. Interest expense has been a benefit as this segment receives credit from the other segments for the value of the deposits it generated.
Average loans, including held for sale, totaled $6.7 billion for the quarter ended September 30, 2017, down slightly from the prior quarter, due primarily to run-off of the LCM portfolios. The LCM portfolios made up $4.5 billion of the current quarter average balance, with a significant portion covered by loss sharing agreements
with the FDIC. These agreements begin to expire in March 2019, the benefit of which is recorded within the indemnification asset. At September 30, 2017, LCM includes $862 million of reverse mortgage loans held for sale (along with $25 million of OREO) in connection with the announced Financial Freedom Transaction. See Note 5 — Indemnification Assets in Item 1. Consolidated Financial Statements of CIT’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016 for more detailed discussion on the indemnification assets and Item 1. Consolidated Financial Statements, Note 2 - Discontinued Operations and Note 17 - Subsequent
Events earlier in this document.
Deposits, which include deposits from the branch and online channels, increased $312 million from the prior quarter, primarily driven by an increase in online High Yield Savings Accounts (“HYSA”), partially offset by a decrease in time deposits and interest-bearing checking accounts. Deposits were up from the year-ago quarter, primarily driven by an increase in online HYSA, partially offset by a decrease in other savings and time deposits.
Other highlights include:
▪
NFR
of $108 million increased from the year-ago quarter as the larger benefit from the value of the excess deposits generated offset the higher negative income on the indemnification assets that reduced interest income. NFR was down from the prior quarter due to lower purchase accounting accretion on loans and higher negative income on the indemnification assets. Net finance margin reflected similar trends. There was approximately $30 million of purchase accounting accretion in the current quarter, compared to $32 million in the year-ago quarter and $35 million in the
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis and Item 3. Quantitative and
Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk 81
prior quarter. There was approximately $14 million of negative interest income in the current quarter, compared to $4 million in the year-ago quarter and $10 million last quarter. The higher negative income on the indemnification asset is due to improved cash flows on the underlying loans which caused a decrease in the expected cash flows to be received on the loss share agreement which expires in March 2019. There was about $4 million of accelerated purchase accounting accretion due to prepayments in the LCM single family
residential mortgages in each of the current, prior quarter and year ago quarters. For the reverse mortgage loans subject to the announced sale, purchase accounting accretion of approximately $5 million has ceased subsequent to the loans being transferred to held for sale at the end of the third quarter. Similarly, year to date NFR is up mostly on the higher benefit from the value of the excess deposits.
▪
Other non-interest income included gains and (losses) on OREO properties, fee revenue and other miscellaneous income. Losses on OREO properties totaled approximately $4 million in the current quarter, driven by impairment charges on OREO properties included as
part of the Financial Freedom Transaction, compared to gains of $3 million in the year-ago quarter and $3 million in the prior quarter. Fee revenue was approximately $2 million in the current and prior quarters, and $3 million in the year-ago quarter. Other revenue was a negative $20 million, impacted by the agreement to sell the reverse mortgage portfolio as part of the Financial Freedom transaction, including a $9 million impairment on reverse mortgage related assets and a $12 million write-down related to the reverse mortgage loan portfolio in held for sale. Other revenue was $7 million in the year-ago quarter, which included $5 million of gains related to the IndyMac Venture, and $1 million
in the prior quarter.
▪
Non-accrual loans were $19 million (0.33% of loans) at September 30, 2017, flat with $20 million (0.29%) at June 30, 2017, and up from $17 million (0.25%) at December 31,
2016, essentially all of which are in LCM. The charge-offs of $20 million in the current quarter included a $15 million provision related to reverse mortgage loans transferred to held for sale in connection with the Financial Freedom Transaction.
▪
The operating expenses are proportionally higher than other segments, which causes the net efficiency ratio to be higher than other segments, reflecting the branch operations and other items. Compared to the year-ago and prior quarters, operating expenses increased, primarily driven by higher advertising and marketing expenses.
Non-Strategic
Portfolios (NSP)
NSP consists of businesses and portfolios that we no longer consider strategic. These portfolios include international equipment financing, secured lending and leasing and advisory services to small and middle-market businesses.
Non-Strategic Portfolios: Financial Data and Metrics (dollars
in millions)
The
2017 results reflect primarily activity from the business in China, while 2016 results also reflect activity from the Canadian Equipment Finance and Corporate Finance businesses, which was sold in October 2016, plus the sale of the U.K. Equipment Finance business, which was sold in January 2016. The quarterly results are down mainly from higher operating costs, partially
offset by higher other income,
related to winding down our international locations. Operating expenses in the prior quarter were lower, primarily reflecting reduced costs due to sales of businesses and the run-off of assets. 2016 year to date, pretax income was higher than 2017 driven by higher earning asset balances and higher other income, which included a gain of $24 million from the sale of the U.K. business.
Loans and leases at September 30, 2017 totaled $88 million, all in China, down from $115 million in the prior quarter and $1.0 billion in the prior year quarter, which also included portfolios in Canada.
Corporate
and Other
Certain items are not allocated to operating segments and are included in Corporate and Other. Some of the more significant and recurring items include interest income on investment securities, a portion of interest expense primarily related to corporate liquidity costs (interest expense), mark-to-market adjustments on non-qualifying derivatives (other non-interest income), restructuring charges for severance and facilities exit activities as well as certain unallocated costs (operating expenses), certain intangible assets amortization expenses (other expenses) and loss on debt extinguishments.
Corporate
and Other: Financial Data and Metrics (dollars in millions)
Loss
on debt extinguishment and deposit redemption
(53.5
)
(164.8
)
(5.2
)
(218.3
)
(9.2
)
Loss
before benefit for income taxes
$
(47.2
)
$
(214.2
)
$
(40.8
)
$
(298.5
)
$
(113.8
)
Select
Balances
Average earning assets
$
9,311.9
$
14,104.9
$
9,153.5
$
10,965.1
$
9,103.5
Earning
assets (end of period)
$
8,026.0
$
9,916.8
$
8,964.2
$
8,026.0
$
8,964.2
•
A
number of noteworthy items impacting our strategic initiatives impact this division, which include the loss on debt extinguishment and deposit redemptions, restructuring costs and net costs associated with liability management and capital actions. In total, these amounts reduced pretax income by $56 million in the current quarter, $2 million in the year-ago quarter and $183 million in the prior quarter, and for the nine months ended, $254 million for September 30, 2017 and $32 million for September 30, 2016.
•
Interest income consists of interest and dividend income, primarily from investment securities
and cash deposited at other financial institutions. The higher balance in the prior quarter reflected cash proceeds from the sale of Commercial Air on April 4, 2017, of which approximately $9 million related to the amount earned between the closing of the Commercial Air sale and the related liability management and capital actions. In addition, we continued to use cash to invest in higher-yielding “High Quality Liquid Assets."
•
Interest expense in Corporate represents amounts in excess of expenses allocated to segments and amounts related to excess liquidity. In the prior quarter, $23 million of the increase from the year-ago and prior quarters
resulted from the interest expense on approximately $5.8 billion of unsecured borrowings that previously was allocated to the Commercial Air discontinued operations but was recorded in continuing operations following the Commercial Air sale on April 4, 2017, until the redemption of that debt later in that quarter.
•
Other non-interest income primarily reflects gains and (losses) on derivatives and foreign currency exchange, and mark to market adjustments on certain MBS securities carried at fair value. Other non-interest income increased from the prior quarter, and the year-ago quarter. Driving the current quarter were mark-to-market benefits on
the MBS securities carried at fair value and gains on investment sales of $10 million. The year-ago quarter included a gain from the MBS securities portfolio carried at fair value of $10 million, offset by mark-to-market charges of $20 million on total return swaps.
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis and Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk 83
Operating
expenses including salary and general and administrative expenses are allocated to the segments based on predetermined forecasts. In the current period, the expenses were below the forecasted amounts, resulting in an overallocation to the segments. Operating expenses for the quarter included $3 million in restructuring costs, compared to $3 million in the prior quarter and $2 million in the year-ago quarter.
•
The loss on debt extinguishment for the current quarter reflects the costs incurred on the tender and redemptions of approximately $0.8 billion of unsecured debt. The loss on debt extinguishment for the prior quarter reflects the costs incurred on the tender and redemptions of approximately
$5.8 billion of unsecured debt. See Note 6 — Borrowings of Item 1. Consolidated Financial Statements and "Funding and Liquidity" later in the MDA.
Total
loans and leases were $37.4 billion at September 30, 2017, up 0.8% from June 30, 2017 but down 0.7% from December 31, 2016, primarily driven by seasonally higher factoring receivables, partially offset by lower loans in Commercial Finance due to prepayments and the run-off of LCM in Consumer Banking. The changes in assets held for sale from December 31, 2016 reflect the additions of the European rail assets and
the reverse mortgage loan portfolio in LCM.
Total loans and leases trends are discussed in the respective segment descriptions in “Results by Business Segment.”
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis and Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk 85
Our ten largest loan and lease accounts, primarily lessors of rail assets and factoring clients, in the aggregate represented 4.8% of our total loans and leases at September 30, 2017 (the largest account was less than 1.0%). The ten largest loan and lease accounts were 4.2% of total loans and leases at December 31, 2016.
COMMERCIAL
CONCENTRATIONS
Geographic Concentrations
The following table represents the commercial loans and leases by obligor geography:
Commercial Loans and Leases by Obligor - Geographic Region (dollars in millions)
The following table summarizes both state concentrations greater than 5.0% and international country concentrations in excess of 1.0% of our loans and leases:
Commercial
Loans and Leases by Obligor - State and Country (dollars in millions)
At
September 30, 2017, includes manufacturers of chemicals, including pharmaceuticals (4.4%), petroleum and coal, including refining (2.6%), food (1.4%), and stone, clay, glass and concrete (1.3%).
(2)
At September 30, 2017 includes retailers of general merchandise (3.2%) and food and beverage providers (1.6%).
CONSUMER
CONCENTRATIONS
The following table presents our total outstanding consumer loans, including PCI loans. During the quarter ended September 30, 2017, the reverse mortgage loan portfolio was transferred to held for sale and is included in the table below. The consumer PCI loans are included in the total outstanding and displayed separately, net of purchase accounting adjustments. PCI loans are discussed in more detail in Note 3 — Loans in Item 1. Consolidated Financial Statements.
For consumer and residential loans, the Company monitors credit risk based on indicators such as delinquencies and loan-to-value (“LTV”). We monitor delinquency and non-performing trends for home equity loans and residential real estate loans.
LTV refers to the ratio comparing the loan’s unpaid principal balance to the property’s collateral value.
We update the property values of real estate collateral if events require current information and calculate current LTV ratios. We examine LTV migration and stratify LTV into categories to monitor the risk in the loan classes.
See Note 3 — Loans in Item 1. Consolidated Financial Statements for information on LTV ratios.
Loan concentrations may exist when multiple borrowers could be similarly impacted by economic or other conditions. The following table summarizes the carrying value of consumer loans, with concentrations in the top five states based upon property address by geographical regions.
Consumer
Loans Geographic Concentrations (dollars in millions)
Tax credit investments & Investments in Unconsolidated Subsidiaries
265.6
220.2
Counterparty
receivables
263.8
437.3
Current and deferred federal and state tax assets
195.4
201.3
Property, furniture and fixtures
178.9
191.1
Indemnification
assets
171.8
341.4
Intangible assets, net
119.1
140.7
Other(1)
472.5
585.0
Total
other assets
$
1,667.1
$
2,117.0
(1)
Other includes executive retirement plan and deferred compensation, prepaid expenses, accrued interest and dividends, servicing advances, OREO and other miscellaneous assets.
Other consists of liabilities for taxes other than income, fair value of derivative financial instruments, equipment maintenance reserves, cash collateral deposits and contingent liabilities and other miscellaneous liabilities.
Item 2. Management’s
Discussion and Analysis and Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk 89
CIT is subject to a variety of
risks that may arise through the Company’s business activities, including the following principal forms of risk:
▪
Strategic Risk
▪
Capital Risk
▪
Credit Risk
▪
Operational
Risk
▪
Asset Risk
▪
Information Technology Risk
▪
Market Risk
▪
Legal and Regulatory Risk
▪
Liquidity Risk
▪
Reputational
Risk
CIT’s Risk Management Group (“RMG”) has established a Risk Governance Framework that is designed to promote appropriate risk identification, measurement, monitoring, management and control.
Our policies and procedures relating to Risk Management are detailed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016.
Interest Rate Risk (a component of Market Risk)
Interest rate risk arises from lending, leasing, investments, deposit taking and funding, as
assets and liabilities reprice at different times as interest rates change. We evaluate and monitor interest rate risk primarily through two metrics.
▪
Net Interest Income Sensitivity (“NII Sensitivity”), which measures the net impact of hypothetical changes in interest rates on forecasted net interest revenue and rental income assuming a static balance sheet over a twelve month period; and
▪
Economic Value of Equity Sensitivity
(“EVE Sensitivity"), which measures the net impact of these hypothetical changes on the value of equity by assessing the economic value of assets, liabilities and derivatives.
Interest rate risk and sensitivity is influenced primarily by the composition of the balance sheet, driven by the type of products offered (fixed/floating rate loans and deposits), investments, funding and hedging activities. Our assets are primarily comprised of commercial loans, consumer loans, equipment owned and leased, cash and investments. Our leasing products are level/fixed payment transactions, whereas the payments on the majority of our commercial loan portfolio is variable based on a floating rate index such as LIBOR or Prime. Our commercial portfolio includes approximately $13.5 billion of fixed-rate (of which $6.7
billion is operating lease equipment) and $15.1 billion of floating rate assets. Our consumer loan portfolio has hybrid, floating rate and level/fixed payment assets (comprised of 47% of unpaid principal balance). Our interest bearing deposits at banks have generally short durations and reprice frequently. We use a variety of funding sources, including online, branch, commercial, and brokered deposit channels as well as wholesale debt funding, including FHLB advances. With respect to liabilities, time deposits and unsecured debt are fixed-rate, secured debt is a mix of fixed and floating rate, and the rates on savings accounts vary based on the market environment and competition. The composition of our assets and liabilities generally results in a net asset-sensitive position at the shorter end of the yield curve, mostly related to moves in LIBOR, whereby
our assets will reprice faster than our liabilities.
Deposits continued to grow as a percent of total funding. CIT Bank, N.A. sources deposits primarily through a retail branch network in Southern California, direct-to-consumer (via the Internet), commercial, and brokered channels. At September 30, 2017, deposits totaled approximately $30 billion. Time deposits were approximately $15 billion and represented approximately 50% of the total, most of which were sourced through direct channels. The deposit rates we offer can be influenced by market conditions and competitive factors. Beta represents the correlation between overall market interest rates
and the rates paid by CIT Bank. We model a beta of approximately 45% on our non-maturity deposits for a +100 bps rate increase over the next 12 months. Changes in interest rates, as well as actions by competitors, can affect our deposit pricing and potentially impact our ability to attract and retain deposits. In a rising rate environment, we may need to increase rates to renew maturing time deposits and attract new deposits. Rates on our savings account deposits may fluctuate due to pricing competition and may also move with short-term interest rates. In general, retail deposits represent a low-cost source of funds and are less sensitive to interest rate changes than floating rate non-deposit funding sources. We regularly test the effect of deposit rate changes on our margins and seek to achieve optimal alignment between assets and liabilities from an interest rate risk management perspective.
The table below summarizes the results of simulation modeling produced by our asset/liability management system. The results reflect the percentage change in the EVE and NII Sensitivity over the next twelve months assuming an immediate 100 basis point parallel increase or decrease in interest rates from the market-based forward curve. NII sensitivity is based on a static balance sheet projection.
As
of September 30, 2017, we ran a range of scenarios, including a 200 basis point parallel increase scenario, which resulted in an NII Sensitivity of 7.3% and an EVE of (1.9)%, while a 200 basis point decline scenario was not run in the current rate environment as the scenario is less relevant. We have an assumed rate floor of 0% for the decline scenarios.
The changes in NII sensitivity as of September 2017 compared to June 2017 is primarily driven by a reduction in cash.
The change in EVE sensitivity as of September 2017 compared to June 2017 is primarily a result of a reduction in cash and secondarily from
liability management actions.
As detailed above, NII sensitivity is positive with respect to an increase in interest rates. This position is primarily driven by our floating rate loan portfolio, which reprices frequently, and cash. Our floating rate loan portfolio includes approximately $7.4 billion of loans ($2.7 billion of commercial loans and $4.7 billion of consumer loans) that are subject to interest rate floors, of which approximately $0.6 billion are still below their floors. On a net basis, we generally have more floating/repricing assets than liabilities in the near term. As a result, our current portfolio is more sensitive to moves in short-term interest rates in the near term. Therefore,
our net interest income may increase if short-term interest rates rise, or decrease if short-term interest rates decline. Market-implied forward rates over the future twelve months are used to determine a base interest rate scenario for the net interest income projection for the base case. This base projection is compared with those calculated under varying interest rate scenarios such as a 100 basis point parallel rate shift to arrive at NII Sensitivity.
EVE complements net interest income simulation and sensitivity analysis as it estimates risk exposures beyond a twelve month horizon. EVE modeling measures the extent to which the economic value of assets, liabilities and off-balance sheet instruments may change in response to a fluctuation in interest rates. EVE is calculated by subjecting the balance sheet to different rate shocks, measuring the net value of assets, liabilities
and off-balance sheet instruments, and comparing those amounts with the EVE sensitivity base case calculated using a market based forward interest rate curve. The methodology with which the operating lease assets are assessed in the results table above reflects the existing contractual rental cash flows and the expected residual value at the end of the existing contract term.
The simulation modeling for both NII Sensitivity and EVE assumes we take no action in response to the changes in interest rates. NII Sensitivity generally assumes cash flow from portfolio run-off is reinvested in similar products.
A wide variety of potential interest rate scenarios are simulated within our asset/liability management
system. All interest sensitive assets and liabilities are valued using discounted cash flow analysis. Rates are shocked up and down via a set of scenarios that include both parallel and non-parallel interest rate movements. Scenarios are also run to capture our sensitivity to changes in the shape of the yield curve. Furthermore, we evaluate the sensitivity of these results to a number of key assumptions, such as credit quality, spreads, and prepayments.
Various holding periods of the operating lease assets are also considered. These range from the current existing lease term to longer terms which assume lease renewals consistent with management’s expected holding period of a particular asset. NII Sensitivity and EVE limits have been set and are monitored for certain of the key scenarios. We manage the exposure to changes in NII Sensitivity and EVE in accordance with our risk appetite
and within Board approved limits.
We use results of our various interest rate risk analyses to formulate asset and liability management (“ALM”) strategies, in coordination with the Asset Liability Committee (“ALCO”), in order to achieve the desired risk profile, while managing our objectives for capital adequacy and liquidity risk exposures. Specifically, we may manage our interest rate risk position through certain pricing strategies for loans and deposits, our investment strategy, issuing term debt with floating or fixed interest rates, and using derivatives such as interest rate swaps, which modify the interest rate characteristics of certain assets or liabilities.
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis and Item 3. Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk 91
These measurements provide an estimate of our interest rate sensitivity; however, they do not account for potential changes in credit quality, size, and prepayment characteristics of our balance sheet. They also do not account for other business developments that could affect income, or for management actions that could affect income or that could be taken to change our risk profile. Accordingly, we can give no assurance that actual results would not differ materially from
the estimated outcomes of our simulations. Further, the range of such simulations does not represent our current view of the expected range of future interest rate movements.
FUNDING AND LIQUIDITY
CIT actively manages and monitors its funding and liquidity sources against relevant limits and targets. These sources satisfy funding and other operating obligations, while also providing protection against unforeseen stress events including unanticipated funding
obligations, such as customer line draws, or disruptions to our access to capital markets or other funding sources. Primary sources of liquidity include cash, investment securities and credit facilities as discussed below.
Cash
Cash totaled $3.1 billion at September 30, 2017, down from $5.3 billion at June 30, 2017, and $6.4 billion at December 31, 2016. Cash at September 30,
2017 consisted of $2.2 billion at CIT Bank, $0.9 billion related to the bank holding company and other operating subsidiaries. The lower cash balance reflected the early retirement of unsecured debt, purchases of investment securities, which are an alternative source of liquidity, and an investment in a new bank owned life insurance policy.
Investment Securities
Investment securities consist primarily of fixed income debt securities. Investment securities increased by $0.2 billion in the third quarter (over $1.2 billion year-to-date) to $5.7 billion
at September 30, 2017, as we continue to deploy cash and grow the investment portfolio. See Note 5 — Investment Securities in Item 1. Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information on types of investment securities.
Liquidity Regulation
The Basel III Final Rule requires banks and BHCs to measure their liquidity against specific liquidity tests. One test, referred to as the liquidity coverage ratio (“LCR”), is designed to ensure that the banking entity maintains an adequate level of unencumbered high-quality liquid assets equal to the entity’s expected net cash outflow for a 30-day time
horizon under an acute liquidity stress scenario. Beginning January 1, 2017, the minimum requirement was 100%. At September 30, 2017, our modified LCR was above 100% at both the Bank and on a consolidated basis.
Credit Facilities
At September 30, 2017, we maintained additional liquidity sources in the form of:
▪
A
multi-year committed Revolving Credit Facility that has a total commitment of $750 million, of which approximately $675 million was available to be drawn; and
▪
Committed securitization facilities and secured bank lines totaled $2.1 billion, of which $975 million was unused at September 30, 2017, provided that eligible assets are available that can be funded through these facilities.
Funding Sources
Funding
sources consist of deposits and borrowings. As we execute on our strategic initiatives, we plan to continue to increase the proportion of deposits in our funding mix. During the third quarter, we repaid $0.8 billion of unsecured borrowings, bringing the total unsecured borrowings either repaid or redeemed this year to $6.6 billion. See Note 6 — Borrowings in Item 1. Consolidated Financial Statements. As such, the amount of deposits to total funding increased to 78% from 68% at December 31, 2016. Unsecured borrowings decreased to 10% from 23% at December 31, 2016 due to the redemptions during 2017, while secured borrowings totaled 12% and 9%, respectively.
The
December 31, 2016 presentation was updated to conform to the current period presentation, which aligns with our management view of the deposit channels.
The following table details our period end deposit balances by type:
Includes
deposit sweep arrangements related to money market and healthcare savings accounts. Healthcare savings account sweeps were fully redeemed as of September 30, 2017.
CIT Bank, N.A. offers a full suite of deposit offerings to its commercial and consumer customers through a network of 70 branches in Southern California and a national online platform. Increasing the proportion of deposit funding and lowering costs is a key area of focus for CIT. Deposits declined during the quarter, as growth in the online channel was more than offset by declines in higher-cost deposits in the brokered channel and higher beta deposits in the commercial channel. Year to date, we have shifted the mix of our deposits, as the decline in longer duration time deposits and higher cost brokered deposits, as well as a reduction of certain commercial
deposits was partially offset by an increase in High Yield Savings Accounts. Beginning in late 2016 and through the first half of 2017, there have been increases in the short-term interest rates and a shift in deposit mix. As such, the weighted average rate of deposits was 1.22% for the quarter ended September 30, 2017, compared to 1.20% for the prior quarter. Compared to the year-ago quarter, the weighted average rate on total outstanding deposits increased by 1 basis point from 1.21%, primarily driven by higher interest rates and a shift in deposit mix. See Net Finance Revenue section for further discussion on average balances and rates.
Borrowings
Borrowings consist of senior unsecured notes
and secured borrowings (structured financings and FHLB advances), which totaled $8.5 billion in aggregate at September 30, 2017, down from $14.9 billion at December 31, 2016. The weighted average coupon rate of borrowings at September 30, 2017 was 3.35%, down from 4.20% at December 31, 2016, reflecting the unsecured debt redemptions.
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis and Item 3. Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk 93
Periodically, based on market conditions and other factors, and subject to compliance with applicable laws and regulations and terms of our existing indebtedness, including the Revolving Credit Facility, the TRS Facility and senior unsecured borrowings, we may repurchase, exchange or redeem outstanding senior unsecured borrowings, repay the Revolving Credit Facility, TRS Facility or otherwise enter into transactions regarding our debt or capital structure. For example, we may periodically evaluate and engage in liability
management transactions, including repurchases of outstanding senior unsecured notes funded by the issuance of, or exchanges of, newly issued unsecured borrowings, as we seek to mitigate refinancing risk by actively managing our debt maturity profile and interest cost.
Unsecured Borrowings
Revolving Credit Facility
There were no borrowings outstanding under the Revolving Credit Facility, which had a total commitment of $750 million at September 30, 2017, and the amount available to draw upon was approximately $675 million,
with the remaining amount of approximately $75 million utilized for issuance of letters of credit.
The applicable margin charged under the facility, covenant and guarantor information and amendments made to the facility in connection with the consummation of the Commercial Air Sale is disclosed in Note 6 — Borrowings in Item 1. Consolidated Financial Statements. As of September 30, 2017, the Company was in compliance with the minimum guarantor asset coverage ratio and the minimum Tier 1 Capital requirement.
Senior
Unsecured Borrowings
At September 30, 2017, senior unsecured borrowings outstanding totaled $3.7 billion and the weighted average coupon rate was 4.81%, down from $10.6 billion and 5.03%, respectively, as of December 31, 2016. The reduction in balance related to the tender and repayments of approximately $0.8 billion and $5.8 billion of unsecured borrowings during the third and second quarters, respectively, as described in detail in Note 6 — Borrowings in Item 1. Consolidated Financial Statements.
Secured
Borrowings
We may pledge assets for secured financing transactions, which include borrowings from the FHLB and/or FRB, conduit securitizations, or for other purposes as required or permitted by law. Our secured financing transactions do not meet accounting requirements for sale treatment and are recorded as secured borrowings, with the assets remaining on-balance sheet pursuant to GAAP. The debt issued in conjunction with these transactions is collateralized by certain discrete receivables, loans, leases and/or underlying equipment. Certain related cash balances are restricted.
FHLB Advances
CIT Bank is a member of the FHLB of San Francisco and may borrow under a line of credit that is secured by pledged
collateral. The Bank makes decisions regarding utilization of advances based upon a number of factors including available collateral, liquidity needs, cost of funds and alternative sources of funding.
Structured financings totaled $1.6 billion at September 30,
2017, and $1.9 billion at December 31, 2016. The weighted average coupon rate of structured financings was 3.62% at September 30, 2017, up from 3.39% at December 31, 2016, reflecting increases in benchmark rates and repayment of lower coupon debt tranches.
CIT Bank, N.A. structured financings totaled $102 million at September 30, 2017 and $241 million at December 31,
2016, which were secured by pledged assets of $177 million and $345 million, respectively. Non-CIT Bank, N.A. structured financings were $1.5 billion and $1.7 billion at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively, and were secured by $4.3 billion of pledged assets at September 30, 2017 and $3.8 billion of pledged assets at December 31, 2016.
See Note 6 — Borrowings in Item 1. Consolidated Financial
Statements for a table displaying our consolidated secured financings and pledged assets and Note 7 — Derivative Financial Instruments for discussion of a total return swap.
FRB
The Company has a borrowing facility with the FRB Discount Window that can be used for short-term, typically overnight, borrowings. The borrowing capacity is determined by the FRB based on the collateral pledged.
There were no outstanding borrowings with the FRB Discount Window as of September 30, 2017
or December 31, 2016. See Note 6 — Borrowings in Item 1. Consolidated Financial Statements for total balances pledged, including amounts to the FRB.
Debt Ratings
Debt ratings can influence the cost and availability of short-and long-term funding, the terms and conditions on which such funding may be available, the collateral requirements, if any, for borrowings and certain derivative instruments, the acceptability of our letters of credit, and the number of investors and counterparties willing to lend to the Company. A
decrease, or potential decrease, in credit ratings could impact access to the capital markets and/or increase the cost of debt, and thereby adversely affect the Company’s liquidity and financial condition.
CIT and CIT Bank, N.A. debt ratings, as rated by Standard & Poor’s Ratings Services (“S&P”), Fitch Ratings, Inc. (“Fitch”), Moody’s Investors Service (“Moody’s”) and DBRS Inc. (“DBRS”) are presented in the following table:
Ratings
S&P
Fitch
Moody’s
DBRS
Last
Credit Update
12/13/16
11/29/16
4/7/17
10/13/17
CIT Group Inc.
Issuer
/ Counterparty Credit Rating
BB+
BB+
N/A
BB (High)
Revolving Credit Facility Rating
BB+
BB+
Ba2
BBB
(Low)
Series C Notes / Senior Unsecured Debt Rating
BB+
BB+
Ba2
BB (High)
Non-Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock
B+
B
B1
B(High)
Outlook
Stable
Stable
Stable
Stable
CIT
Bank, N.A.
Deposit Rating (LT/ST)
N/A
BBB-/F3
Baa2/P-2
BBB
(Low)/R-2(Mid)
Issuer Senior Unsecured Debt
BBB-
BB+
Ba2
BBB (Low)
Outlook
Stable
Stable
Stable
Stable
N/A
— Not Applicable
Rating agencies indicate that they base their ratings on many quantitative and qualitative factors, including capital adequacy, liquidity, asset quality, business mix, level and quality of earnings, and the current operating, legislative and regulatory environment, including implied government support. In addition, rating agencies themselves have been subject to scrutiny arising from the financial crisis and could make or be required to make substantial changes to their ratings policies and practices, particularly in response to legislative and regulatory changes, including as a result of provisions in the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the “Dodd-Frank Act”). Potential changes in rating methodology as well as in the legislative and regulatory environment and the timing of those changes could impact our ratings, which as noted
above could impact our liquidity and financial condition.
A debt rating is not a recommendation to buy, sell or hold securities, and the ratings are subject to revision or withdrawal at any time by the assigning rating agency. Each rating should be evaluated independently of any other rating.
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis and Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk 95
Commitment Expiration for the Twelve Months Ended September 30 (dollars in millions)
Total
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022+
Financing
commitments
$
6,284.9
$
1,822.7
$
696.9
$
1,297.9
$
1,139.1
$
1,328.3
Rail
and other purchase commitments
227.4
227.4
—
—
—
—
Letters
of credit
227.1
48.5
56.2
20.4
60.5
41.5
Deferred
purchase agreements
2,224.5
2,224.5
—
—
—
—
Guarantees,
acceptances and other recourse obligations
1.5
1.5
—
—
—
—
Liabilities
for unrecognized tax obligations(1)
13.7
5.0
8.7
—
—
—
Total
contractual commitments
$
8,979.1
$
4,329.6
$
761.8
$
1,318.3
$
1,199.6
$
1,369.8
(1) The
balance for 2019 reflects the remaining balance, which cannot be estimated further.
Financing commitments increased from $6.0 billion at December 31, 2016 to $6.3 billion at September 30, 2017. Financing commitments include commitments that have been extended to and accepted by customers or agents, but on which the criteria for funding have not been completed of $1.2 billion at September 30, 2017. Also included are Business Capital credit line agreements, with an amount available of $290
million, net of the amount of receivables assigned to us. These are cancellable by CIT only after a notice period.
At September 30, 2017, substantially all our undrawn financing commitments were senior facilities, with approximately 83% secured by commercial equipment or other assets, and the remainder comprised of cash flow or enterprise value facilities. Most of our undrawn and available financing commitments are in the Commercial Finance division of Commercial Banking. The top ten undrawn commitments totaled $559 million at September 30, 2017. The table above includes approximately
$1.7 billion of undrawn financing commitments at September 30, 2017 for instances where the customer is not in compliance with contractual obligations or does not have the adequate collateral to borrow against the unused facility, and therefore CIT does not have a contractual obligation to lend under such financing commitments.
See Note 12 — Commitments in Item 1. Consolidated Financial Statements for further detail.
CAPITAL
Capital
Management
CIT manages its capital position to ensure that it is sufficient to: (i) support the risks of its businesses, (ii) maintain a “well-capitalized” status under regulatory requirements, and (iii) provide flexibility to take advantage of future investment opportunities. Capital in excess of these requirements is available to distribute to shareholders, subject to a “non-objection” to our capital plan from the FRB.
CIT uses a combination of capital metrics and related thresholds to measure capital adequacy and takes into account the existing regulatory capital framework. CIT further evaluates capital adequacy through the enterprise stress testing and economic capital (“ECAP”) approaches.
CIT
is subject to enhanced prudential standards under the Dodd-Frank Act. Among other requirements, CIT is subject to capital planning and stress testing requirements under the FRB’s Comprehensive Capital Analysis and Review (“CCAR”) process, which requires CIT to submit an annual capital plan and demonstrate that it can meet minimum capital requirements over a nine quarter planning horizon under multiple stress scenarios.
CIT submitted its capital plan to the FRB on April 5, 2017 and on June 28, 2017, received a non-objection to the plan, which included a quarterly cash dividend of up to $0.16 per share and common stock repurchases of up to $225 million for the four quarters ending June 30, 2018, including up to $25 million of
common share repurchases to offset dilution from issuances pursuant to CIT's employee stock plans.
CIT’s capital management is discussed further in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016 in the “Regulation” section of Item 1. Business Overview with respect to capital and regulatory matters, including “Capital Requirements” and “Stress Test and Capital Plan Requirements”.
Year to date September 30, 2017, CIT repurchased an aggregate of $3.4 billion of common shares through a combination of an equity tender offer, open market repurchases of shares ("OMR") and an accelerated share repurchase program ("ASR"). The equity tender resulted in the Company repurchasing approximately 57.3 million common shares at a purchase price of $48 per share (total of approximately $2.75 billion). The OMRs resulted in the repurchase of 818,071 common shares at an average price of $46.45 per share in the second quarter of 2017 and
2,660,893 common shares at an average price of $44.82 per share during the third quarter of 2017. Under the terms of the ASR, CIT paid to the dealer $512 million in exchange for the initial delivery of approximately 9.25 million common shares. During the 3rd quarter of 2017, the ASR final settlement resulted in CIT receiving 1,452,119 common shares. Total average cost of the ASR was $47.82 per share.
CIT has $106 million of repurchases remaining that can be executed by the end of the first half of 2018 under current authorizations, of which $6 million is eligible for execution in the 2017 fourth quarter.
We declared the following common stock dividends in 2017:
On May 31, 2017, CIT Group Inc. issued 325,000 shares, par value $1,000, of Fixed-to-Floating Rate Non-Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series A (the “Preferred Stock”). The shares pay at a perpetual dividend rate (non-cumulative) per annum equal to 5.80% from the original issue date to, but excluding, June 15, 2022. Thereafter, the shares pay at a floating rate per annum equal to three-month LIBOR on the related dividend determination date plus a spread of 3.972% per annum. Dividends are paid semi-annually in arrears on June 15 and December 15, beginning on December 15, 2017 and ending on June 15, 2022. Thereafter, dividends will be paid quarterly
in arrears on March 15, June 15, September 15 and December 15 of each year. The Issuer may redeem the Preferred Stock at its option, at a redemption price equal to $1,000 per share, plus any declared and unpaid dividends, without regard to any undeclared dividends, (i) in whole or in part, from time to time, on any dividend payment date on or after June 15, 2022, or (ii) in whole, but not in part, within 90 days following the occurrence of a “regulatory capital treatment event”. Net proceeds were $318.0 million.
On October 16, 2017, the Board of Directors declared a semi-annual preferred cash dividend of $30.29 per preferred share on outstanding preferred stock. The preferred stock dividend is payable on December 15, 2017,
to preferred shareholders of record as of November 30, 2017.
The Company is subject to various regulatory capital requirements. We compute capital ratios in accordance with Federal Reserve capital guidelines for assessing adequacy of capital. The regulatory capital guidelines applicable to the Company were based on the Basel III Final Rule. At September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the capital ratios of the
Company and the Bank exceeded all capital adequacy requirements under the Basel III Final Rule on a fully phased-in basis.
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis and Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk 97
Effect
of certain items in accumulated other comprehensive loss excluded from CET1 Capital and qualifying noncontrolling interests
65.7
65.7
79.1
79.1
Adjusted
total equity
7,192.0
7,192.0
10,081.8
10,081.8
Less: Goodwill, net associated deferred tax liabilities (DTLs)(2)
(659.2
)
(659.2
)
(733.1
)
(733.1
)
Less:
Deferred tax assets (DTAs) arising from net operating loss and tax credit carryforwards
(93.3
)
(116.6
)
(213.7
)
(213.7
)
Less: Intangible assets, net of associated
DTLs(2)
(69.3
)
(86.7
)
(68.3
)
(113.8
)
Less: Other CET1 Capital deductions (3)
—
—
(7.8
)
(17.5
)
Total
CET1 Capital
6,370.2
6,329.5
9,058.9
9,003.7
Additional Tier 1 Capital
Preferred
Stock
325.0
325.0
—
—
Less: Other Additional Tier 1 Capital deductions (4)
(55.2
)
(31.8
)
—
—
Total
Additional Tier 1 Capital
269.8
293.2
—
—
Total Tier 1 Capital
6,640.0
6,622.7
9,058.9
9,003.7
Tier
2 Capital
Qualifying allowance for credit losses and other reserves(5)
463.8
463.8
476.3
476.3
Total
Capital
$
7,103.8
$
7,086.5
$
9,535.2
$
9,480.0
Risk-Weighted
Assets
$
44,672.7
$
45,123.5
$
64,586.3
$
65,068.2
CIT
Ratios
CET1 Capital Ratio
14.3
%
14.0
%
14.0
%
13.8
%
Tier
1 Capital Ratio
14.9
%
14.7
%
14.0
%
13.8
%
Total Capital Ratio
15.9
%
15.7
%
14.8
%
14.6
%
Tier
1 Leverage Ratio
13.4
%
13.4
%
13.9
%
13.9
%
CIT Bank, N.A. Ratios
CET1
Capital Ratio
13.9
%
13.7
%
13.4
%
13.2
%
Tier 1 Capital Ratio
13.9
%
13.7
%
13.4
%
13.2
%
Total
Capital Ratio
15.1
%
15.0
%
14.7
%
14.4
%
Tier 1 Leverage Ratio
11.7
%
11.7
%
10.9
%
10.8
%
(1)
See
Consolidated Balance Sheets for the components of Total common stockholders’ equity.
(2)
Goodwill and disallowed intangible assets adjustments also reflect the portion included within assets held for sale and discontinued operations.
(3)
Represents deductions applied to CET1 Capital due to insufficient amount of Additional Tier 1 Capital to cover deductions, including 20% of the deduction on DTAs arising from net operating loss and tax carryforwards applied to Additional
Tier 1 Capital under transition basis, and covered funds deduction required by the Volcker Rule.
(4)
Represents 20% of the deduction on DTAs arising from net operating loss and tax credit carryforwards applied to Additional Tier 1 Capital under transition basis, and covered funds deduction required by the Volcker Rule.
(5)
“Other reserves” represents additional credit loss reserves for unfunded lending commitments, letters of credit, and deferred purchase agreements,
all of which are recorded in Other Liabilities.
The reconciliation of balance sheet assets to risk-weighted assets is presented below:
Risk weighting adjustments to balance sheet assets
(10,342.6
)
(13,241.6
)
Off-Balance
sheet items
5,679.8
13,657.7
Risk-Weighted Assets
$
44,672.7
$
64,586.3
The
2017 off-balance sheet items primarily reflect $2.8 billion of unused lines of credit (largely related to the Commercial Finance and Real Estate Finance divisions), $2.2 billion of deferred purchase agreements (related to the factoring business within the Business Capital division), and $0.7 billion of other items. The risk-weighted assets for off-balance sheet items as of September 30, 2017 decreased from December 31, 2016 mainly due to the sale of the Commercial Air business, which had
purchase commitments of $8.7 billion at December 31, 2016. See Note 12 — Commitments in Item 1. Consolidated Financial Statements for further detail on commitments.
Tangible Book Value and per Share Amounts (dollars
in millions, except per share amounts)
Tangible
book value and tangible book value per share are non-GAAP measures.
Book value and Tangible book value (“TBV”) decreased from December 31, 2016, primarily reflecting the capital actions completed through September 2017. Book Value and Tangible book value per share increased as a result of approximately 71.5 million common shares being repurchased since December 31, 2016.
CIT
BANK, N.A.
Total assets for the Bank were down compared to December 31, 2016. Total loans and leases were down 4.3%, as growth from new business volume was offset by portfolio runoff, collections and sales. Loans were down 6.3% from December 31, 2016, reflecting reductions in the LCM portfolio as the portfolio continues to run off and the reverse mortgage portfolio was transferred into Assets Held for Sale as part of the Financial Freedom Transaction. In addition there were reductions in Commercial Finance, related to higher prepayments and portfolio sales. Operating lease equipment was up 4.5% from December 31, 2016, attributable to higher balances in Rail and Business Capital. The portfolio of operating lease equipment, of $3.7
billion, is comprised mostly of railcars. Assets Held for Sale increased 22.4% from December 31, 2016 mainly due to the addition of the reverse mortgage portfolio, which was part of the announced Financial Freedom Transaction. These additions were partially offset by sales in Business Air as well as other decreases within the Commercial Finance portfolio.
Cash and investment securities totaled $7.7 billion at September 30, 2017, down $0.9 billion from December 31, 2016, mainly attributable to a decrease in cash. The decrease in cash was primarily used to increase the investment securities ($1.4 billion) and for an investment in Bank Owned Life Insurance ($0.7 billion). Investments increased to $5.5 billion from $4.0 billion at December 31,
2016. The investment securities are mostly mortgage-backed and federal agency securities. As part of our business strategy, CIT Bank continued to redeploy available cash into higher-yielding “High Quality Liquid Assets.”
Indemnification assets decreased to $171.8 million from $341.4 million at December 31, 2016, primarily due to an agreement reached with the FDIC during the 2nd quarter of 2017 to release approximately $77 million of indemnification assets for covered servicing-related obligations related to Fannie Mae serviced reverse mortgage loans pursuant to the loss share agreement between CIT Bank and the FDIC related to the acquisition by OneWest Bank.
CIT Bank deposits decreased from December 31,
2016. See discussion of deposits in "Funding and Liquidity" section.
FHLB advances provide a consistent source of both available and contingent funding for the Bank, which is a member of the FHLB of San Francisco. Borrowings increased from December 31, 2016, reflecting advances of $750 million during the current quarter.
The Bank’s capital and leverage ratios are included in the tables that follow and remained well above required levels. CIT Bank reports regulatory capital ratios in accordance with the Basel III Final Rule and determines risk weighted assets under the Standardized Approach.
Item 2. Management’s
Discussion and Analysis and Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk 99
Total
net revenue, net of interest expense and credit provision
439.7
514.9
516.0
1,435.2
1,373.9
Operating
expenses
(215.5
)
(253.2
)
(257.3
)
(729.4
)
(785.5
)
Depreciation
on operating lease equipment
(51.3
)
(48.8
)
(42.6
)
(146.5
)
(118.2
)
Maintenance
and other operating lease expenses
(7.1
)
(5.8
)
(3.8
)
(21.0
)
(16.3
)
Loss
on debt extinguishment and deposit redemption
(0.7
)
(0.5
)
(4.9
)
(1.2
)
(7.3
)
Income
before provision for income taxes
165.1
206.6
207.4
537.1
446.6
Provision
for income taxes
(55.8
)
(53.3
)
(74.1
)
(170.0
)
(158.7
)
Income
from continuing operations
109.3
153.3
133.3
367.1
287.9
Income
(loss) on discontinued operations
(4.4
)
10.4
(29.9
)
(3.2
)
(201.1
)
Net
income
$
104.9
$
163.7
$
103.4
$
363.9
$
86.8
New
business volume — funded
$
2,216.5
$
2,168.7
$
2,403.9
$
6,132.6
$
6,871.5
Compared
to the prior quarter, the Bank’s current quarter results were impacted by impairments recorded related to the reverse mortgage portfolio associated with the Financial Freedom Transaction, with charges in both other non-interest income and provision for credit losses. The decrease in interest income reflects lower PAA. The decline also reflected a reduction in AEA from last quarter from the use of cash proceeds that were on deposit with the Bank related to the Commercial Air sale. Compared to the year-ago quarter, net income was flat although there have been improvements in various areas such as operating expenses and provision for credit losses.
Interest income decreased from the prior quarter due to lower PAA accretion and a decrease in interest bearing deposits related to the proceeds from the Aerospace sale. The decrease from the year-ago quarter reflects lower PAA accretion
mainly in the Commercial Banking portfolio as well as decreases due to a decline in AEA.
Other non-interest income in the current quarter decreased from both the prior quarter and the year-ago quarter due to a $9 million impairment on reverse mortgage related assets and $12 million write down related to the reverse mortgage portfolio in held for sale reflecting the agreement to sell the reverse mortgage portfolio as part of the Financial Freedom Transaction. In addition, the current quarter contains lower gains on asset sales. The year-ago quarter also included a gain of $47 million related to the sale of aircraft to the Bank Holding Company (which eliminates in consolidation) associated with the sale of Commercial Air.
The provision for credit losses in the current quarter increased from
the prior quarter but decreased from the year-ago quarter. The increase in the current quarter is due to a $15 million provision recorded on the transfer of the reverse mortgage portfolio to held for sale, while the increase versus the year-ago quarter is a result of lower reserves mainly in the Commercial Banking business which are largely balance related. Net charge-offs were 0.65% and 0.27% for the third and second quarter of 2017, respectively. Excluding the impact of the reverse mortgage charge-offs related to the transfer to held for sale, the current quarter net charge-offs would have been 0.35%.
Operating expenses were down from the year-ago quarter and prior quarter, which resulted in an improved efficiency ratio. The decrease is a result of a decrease in professional fees, FDIC insurance and sales and use taxes. The net efficiency ratio was 50.8%, compared to 49.0%
in the year-ago quarter and 52.7% in the prior quarter.
The current quarter includes a loss from discontinued operations related to Financial Freedom and is driven by an increase in the service related contingent liability associated with the announced sale. Prior quarter included a gain on discontinued operations, which was driven by a net release of the servicing-related reserves, partially offset by an impairment charge related to the mortgage servicing rights. In addition, during the prior quarter, the Company entered into a settlement with the HUD OIG and Department of Justice to resolve servicing related claims for an amount within the Company’s existing reserves. The
Company also recognized a write-down of its servicing operations of $54 million, of which $50 million related to impairment of its mortgage servicing rights.
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis and Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk 101
Discontinued Operations is discussed in an earlier section in
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and Note 2 — Discontinued Operations in Item 1. Consolidated Financial Statements.
The
decline in AEA from last quarter reflects the use of cash proceeds that were on deposit with the Bank from the Commercial Air sale, which elevated the AEA in the second quarter. Since our loans and lease composition includes operating lease equipment (10% of AEA as of September 30, 2017), the Company believes NFM is a more appropriate metric for the Bank, as opposed to net interest margin (“NIM”) (a common metric used by other banks), as NIM would not reflect the net revenue from the operating lease portfolio.
Operating leases contributed $54 million to NFR during the current quarter, compared to $56 million in the prior quarter and $55 million in year-ago quarter.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to use judgment in making estimates and assumptions that affect reported amounts of assets
and liabilities, reported amounts of income and expense and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. The following estimates, which are based on relevant information available at the end of each period, include inherent risks and uncertainties related to judgments and assumptions made. We consider the estimates to be critical in applying our accounting policies, due to the existence of uncertainty at the time the estimate is made, the likelihood of changes in estimates from period to period and the potential impact on the financial statements.
Management believes that the judgments and estimates utilized in the following critical accounting estimates are reasonable. We do not believe that different assumptions are more likely than those utilized, although actual events may differ from such assumptions. Consequently, our estimates could prove inaccurate, and we may be
exposed to charges to earnings that could be material.
▪
Allowance for Loan Losses
▪
Liabilities for Uncertain Tax Positions
▪
Loan Impairment
▪
Realizability of Deferred Tax Assets
▪
Fair Value Determination
▪
Contingent
Liabilities
▪
Lease Residual Values
▪
Goodwill Assets
The determination of goodwill impairment requires significant judgment and the consideration of past and current performance and overall macroeconomic and regulatory environments. There is risk that if the Company does not meet forecasted financial results, such as asset volume and returns and deposit growth and rate projections, there could be incremental goodwill impairment. In addition to financial results, other inputs to the valuation, such as the discount rate
and market assumptions, including stock prices of comparable companies, could negatively affect the estimated fair value of the reporting units in the future. Refer to Note 26 - Goodwill and Intangible Assets within our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016 for a detailed description of the key assumptions used to identify and quantify goodwill impairment, if applicable.
There have been no significant changes to the methodologies and processes used in developing estimates relating to these items from those described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016.
Item 2. Management’s
Discussion and Analysis and Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk 103
Loans
and loans held for sale (net of credit balances of factoring clients)(2)(3)
U.S.(2)
27,960.2
1,238.7
5.91
%
29,361.8
1,283.1
5.83
%
Non-U.S.
299.4
29.3
13.05
%
1,199.3
76.2
8.47
%
Total
Loans(2)
28,259.6
1,268.0
5.98
%
30,561.1
1,359.3
5.93
%
Total
interest earning assets / interest income(2)(3)
39,630.4
1,419.0
4.77
%
40,346.8
1,453.2
4.80
%
Operating
lease equipment, net (including held for sale)(4)
U.S.(4)
6,045.8
292.9
6.46
%
5,804.3
347.3
7.98
%
Non-U.S.(4)
1,591.3
74.9
6.28
%
1,367.2
84.7
8.26
%
Total
operating leases, net(4)
7,637.1
367.8
6.42
%
7,171.5
432.0
8.03
%
Indemnification
assets
268.2
(31.1
)
(15.46
)%
381.7
(15.9
)
(5.55
)%
Average
earning assets ("AEA")(2)
47,535.7
1,755.7
4.92
%
47,900.0
1,869.3
5.20
%
Non-interest
earning assets
Cash and due from banks
647.3
905.6
Allowance
for loan losses
(431.6
)
(382.2
)
All
other non-interest bearing assets
2,279.9
4,236.9
Assets
of discontinued operation
4,837.7
12,968.7
Total
Average Assets
$
54,869.0
$
65,629.0
Liabilities
Interest
bearing deposits and borrowings
Interest bearing deposits
$
29,952.9
281.2
1.25
%
$
31,725.2
298.3
1.25
%
Borrowings(5)
11,351.1
267.8
3.15
%
15,725.3
276.5
2.34
%
Total
interest-bearing liabilities
41,304.0
549.0
1.77
%
47,450.5
574.8
1.62
%
Non-interest
bearing deposits
1,437.2
1,125.8
Other
non-interest bearing liabilities
1,642.7
1,629.0
Liabilities
of discontinued operation
1,560.3
4,288.5
Noncontrolling
interests
0.3
0.5
Stockholders'
equity
8,924.5
11,134.7
Total
Average Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity
$
54,869.0
$
65,629.0
Net
revenue spread
3.15
%
3.58
%
Impact
of non-interest bearing sources
0.23
%
0.02
%
Net
revenue/yield on earning assets(2)
$
1,206.7
3.38
%
$
1,294.5
3.60
%
(1)
The
average balances presented are derived based on month end balances during the year. Tax exempt income was not significant in any of the periods presented. Average rates are impacted by PAA accretion and amortization.
(2)
The balance and rate presented is calculated net of average credit balances for factoring clients.
(3)
Non-accrual loans and related income are included in the respective categories.
(4)
Operating
lease rental income is a significant source of revenue; therefore we have presented the rental revenues net of depreciation and net of maintenance and other operating lease expenses.
(5)
See table with adjusted balances and commentary in the Net Finance Revenue section.
The SEC adopted regulations that apply to any public disclosure or release of material information that includes a non-GAAP financial measure. A non-GAAP financial measure is a numerical measure of a company’s historical or future financial performance or financial position that may either exclude or include amounts, or is adjusted in some way to the effect of including or excluding, as compared to the most directly
comparable measure calculated and presented in accordance with GAAP financial statements.
The accompanying Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure about Market Risk contain certain non-GAAP financial measures. We intend our non-GAAP financial measures to provide additional information and insight regarding operating results and financial position of the business and in certain cases to provide financial information that is presented to rating agencies and other users of financial information.
These non-GAAP measures are not in accordance with, or a substitute for, GAAP and may be different from or inconsistent with non-GAAP financial measures used by other companies.
1.
Total
Net Revenue, Net Finance Revenue, Net Financing Margin (“NFM”), and Net Operating Lease Revenue
Total net revenue is a non-GAAP measure that represents the combination of net finance revenue and other income and is an aggregation of all sources of revenue for the Company. The source of the data is various statement of income line items, arranged in a different order, and with different subtotals than included in the statement of income, and therefore is considered non-GAAP. Total net revenue is used by management to monitor business performance and is used by management to calculate a net efficiency ratio, as discussed below.
Net finance revenue is a non-GAAP measure that represents
the level of revenue earned on our loans and leases. NFR is another key performance measure used by management to monitor portfolio performance. NFR is also used to calculate a performance margin, NFM.
Due to the nature of our loans and leases, which include a higher proportion of operating lease equipment than most BHCs, certain financial measures commonly used by other BHCs are not as meaningful for our Company. As such, given our asset composition includes a high level of operating lease equipment, net finance margin as calculated below is used by management, compared to net interest margin (“NIM”) (a common metric used by other bank holding companies), which does not fully reflect the earnings of our portfolio because it includes the impact of debt costs of all our assets but excludes
the net operating lease revenue.
Net operating lease revenue is a non-GAAP measure that represents the combination of rental income on operating leases less depreciation on operating lease equipment and maintenance and other operating lease expenses. The net operating lease revenues measurement is used by management to monitor portfolio performance and returns on its purchased equipment.
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis and Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk 105
Operating Expenses and Net Efficiency Ratio, Excluding Certain Costs
A key performance metric the Company uses to gauge the level of expenses is in comparison to the average earning assets. A decline in this metric
could show improvement, i.e. expenses not going up at the same rate of asset growth, or decreasing at a rate in excess of asset decline. Operating expenses excluding restructuring costs and intangible asset amortization is a non-GAAP measure used by management to compare period over period expenses. Another key performance metric gauges our expense usage via our net efficiency calculation. This calculation compares the level of expenses to the level of net revenues and is calculated by dividing the operating expenses by total net revenue, as presented below. A lower result reflects a more efficient use of our expenses to generate revenue. Net efficiency ratio is a non-GAAP measurement used by management to measure operating expenses (before restructuring costs and intangible amortization) to total net revenues. We exclude the recurring items from these calculations as they are charges resulting from our strategic initiatives and not our operating activity, and exclude
the noteworthy items due to their episodic nature and size. Due to the exclusions of the mentioned items, and in certain instances, other noteworthy items, these are considered non-GAAP measures, as presented in the reconciliation below.
Operating Expenses Excluding Certain Costs (dollars in millions)
Operating
expenses exclusive of restructuring costs and intangible assets amortization, and other noteworthy items(Non-GAAP)
$
(268.2
)
$
(286.0
)
$
(294.2
)
$
(844.8
)
$
(890.8
)
Operating
expenses (exclusive of restructuring costs and intangible assets amortization) as a % of AEA
2.36
%
2.26
%
2.47
%
2.37
%
2.48
%
Operating
expenses excluding restructuring costs and intangible asset amortization and other noteworthy items as a % of AEA
2.36
%
2.43
%
2.47
%
2.43
%
2.48
%
Total
Net Revenue (Non-GAAP)
$
463.9
$
474.1
$
501.9
$
1,433.7
$
1,562.7
Suspended
depreciation on assets HFS
(7.8
)
—
—
(7.8
)
—
Financial
Freedom Transaction impairments on reverse mortgage related assets
26.8
—
—
26.8
—
Net
costs of excess liquidity
—
14.3
—
14.3
—
CTA
Charge
—
—
—
8.1
—
Gain
on sale - UK business
—
—
—
—
(23.5
)
Asset
Impairment
—
—
—
—
11.0
Liquidating
Europe CTA
—
—
—
—
3.3
Gain
related to IndyMac venture
(5.0
)
(5.0
)
Total Net Revenue, excluding noteworthy items (Non-GAAP)
$
482.9
$
488.4
$
496.9
$
1,475.1
$
1,548.5
Net
Efficiency Ratio
57.8
%
60.3
%
58.6
%
58.9
%
57.0
%
Net
Efficiency Ratio excluding noteworthy items
55.5
%
58.6
%
59.2
%
57.3
%
57.5
%
3.
Other
Non-Interest Income
Other non-interest income serves as a source of revenue for CIT. Management monitors the level absent certain items to assist in comparability with prior period levels. We exclude the noteworthy items due to their episodic nature and size. Due to the exclusions of noteworthy items, these are considered non-GAAP measures, as presented in the reconciliation below.
Other
Non-Interest Income, Excluding Noteworthy Items (dollars in millions)
Earning asset balances displayed in the table
below are directly derived from the respective line items in the balance sheet. These represent revenue generating assets, and the average (AEA) of which provides a basis for management performance calculations such as NFM and operating expenses as a percentage of AEA. The average is derived using month end balances for the respective period. Because the balances are used in aggregate, as well the average, there are no direct comparative balances on the balance sheet, therefore these are considered non-GAAP measures.
Period
End Earning Assets and Average Earning Asset Total (dollars in millions)
Average
Earning Assets (for the respective periods) (Non-GAAP)
$
45,454.2
$
50,675.8
$
46,964.7
$
47,728.7
$
47,535.7
$
47,900.0
AEA
adjustment for Commercial Air sale impacts
—
(3,686.0
)
—
—
(1,244.0
)
—
AEA,
excluding noteworthy items (Non-GAAP)
$
45,454.2
$
46,989.8
$
46,964.7
$
47,728.7
$
46,291.7
$
47,900.0
5.
Tangible Book Value, ROTCE and Tangible Book Value per Share
Tangible book value (TBV, also referred to as tangible common equity), return on tangible common equity (ROTCE), and TBV per share are considered key financial performance measures by management, and are used by other financial institutions. TBV, as calculated and used by management, represents CIT’s common stockholders’ equity, less goodwill and intangible assets. ROTCE measures CIT’s net income applicable to common shareholders as a percentage of average tangible common equity. This measure is useful for evaluating the performance of CIT as it calculates the return available to common shareholders without the impact of intangible assets and deferred tax assets. The average adjusted tangible common equity is derived using averages of balances presented, based on month end balances for the period. TBV
per share is calculated dividing TBV by the outstanding number of common shares. TBV, ROTCE and TBV per share are measurements used by management and users of CIT’s financial data in assessing CIT’s use of equity. We believe the use of ratios that utilize tangible equity provides additional useful information because they present measures of those assets that can generate income.
CIT management believes TBV, ROTCE and TBV per share are important measures for comparative purposes with other institutions, but are not defined under U.S. GAAP, and therefore considered non-GAAP financial measures.
To provide further information, management included ROTCE calculations, ROTCE calculations excluding noteworthy items and adjusted for the previously disclosed return of capital of common equity to shareholders
from the net proceeds of the Commercial Air sale.
Estimated
capital adjustment related to Commercial Air sale
—
(1,903.1
)
(2,975.0
)
(1,424.8
)
(2,975.0
)
Average
tangible common equity, adjusted (Non-GAAP)
$
6,249.1
$
6,377.3
$
6,177.8
$
6,453.5
$
6,086.9
Net
income (GAAP)
$
219.6
$
156.7
$
131.5
$
556.2
$
294.5
Intangible
asset amortization, after tax
5.0
4.0
4.5
13.0
12.2
Valuation
allowance
—
—
15.7
—
15.7
Non-GAAP
income - for ROTCE calculation
$
224.6
$
160.7
$
151.7
$
569.2
$
322.4
Return
on average tangible common equity
14.38
%
7.76
%
6.63
%
9.63
%
4.74
%
Non-GAAP
income, excluding noteworthy items
$
137.8
$
129.1
$
169.3
$
430.0
$
499.6
Intangible
asset amortization, after tax
5.0
4.0
4.5
13.0
12.2
Valuation
allowance
—
—
15.7
—
15.7
Non-GAAP
income, excluding noteworthy items - for ROTCE calculation
$
142.8
$
133.1
$
189.5
$
443.0
$
527.5
Return
on average tangible common equity, excluding noteworthy items
9.14
%
6.43
%
8.28
%
7.50
%
7.76
%
Return
on average tangible common equity, after noteworthy items and estimated capital adjustment
9.14
%
8.35
%
12.27
%
9.15
%
11.55
%
Income
from continuing operations (GAAP)
$
222.8
$
41.2
$
94.2
$
342.2
$
243.2
Intangible
asset amortization, after tax
5.0
4.0
4.5
13.0
12.2
Valuation
allowance
—
—
15.7
—
15.7
Non-GAAP
income from continuing operations - for ROTCE calculation
$
227.8
$
45.2
$
114.4
$
355.2
$
271.1
Return
on average tangible common equity, adjusted for estimated capital adjustment
14.58
%
2.84
%
7.41
%
7.34
%
5.94
%
Non-GAAP
income from continuing operations (from next page)
$
138.7
$
125.7
$
108.6
$
373.8
$
259.3
Intangible
asset amortization, after tax
5.0
4.0
4.5
13.0
12.2
Valuation
allowance
—
—
15.7
—
15.7
Non-GAAP
income from continuing operations - for ROTCE calculation
$
143.7
$
129.7
$
128.8
$
386.8
$
287.2
Return
on average tangible common equity, after noteworthy items and estimated capital adjustment
9.20
%
8.14
%
8.34
%
7.99
%
6.29
%
6.
Net
income excluding noteworthy items and income from continuing operations excluding noteworthy items
Net income excluding noteworthy items and income from continuing operations excluding noteworthy items are non-GAAP measures used by management as each excludes items from the respective line item in the GAAP statement of income. Due to volume and size of noteworthy items, the Company believes that adjusting for these items provides the user of CIT’s financial information a measure of the underlying performance of the Company and of continuing operations specifically. The non-GAAP noteworthy items are summarized in the following categories: significant due to the magnitude of the transaction;
transactions pertaining to items no longer considered core to CIT’s on-going operations (i.e. sales of Non-Strategic Portfolios); legacy OneWest Bank issues prior to CIT’s ownership; and recurring items consistently noted in other non-GAAP measures, even though balance may not have been significant.
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis and Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk 109
Financial Freedom interest curtailment reserve and servicing rights impairment
249.0
(74.0
)
175.0
0.86
Business
Air goodwill impairment
22.6
(8.6
)
14.0
0.07
Non-GAAP
income from continuing operations, excluding noteworthy items(1)
$
499.6
$
2.47
Income
from continuing operations
$
243.2
$
1.21
Continuing
Operations
Restructuring expenses
Operating expenses
$
32.3
$
(12.4
)
19.9
0.10
Gain
on sale - UK
Other non-interest income
(23.5
)
8.2
(15.3
)
(0.08
)
Discrete
tax benefit
Benefit for income taxes
—
(13.0
)
(13.0
)
(0.06
)
Asset
impairment
Other non-interest income
11.0
(2.8
)
8.2
0.04
Liquidating
Europe CTA
Other non-interest income
3.3
—
3.3
0.02
China
valuation allowance
Benefit / provision for income taxes
—
16.0
16.0
0.08
Gain
related to IndyMac venture
Other non-interest income
(5.0
)
2.0
(3.0
)
(0.01
)
Non-GAAP
income from continuing operations, excluding noteworthy items(1)
$
259.3
$
1.28
(1)
Items
may not sum due to rounding.
(2)
Income tax rates vary depending on the specific item and the entity location in which it is recorded.
7. Effective Tax Rate Reconciliation
The provision for income taxes before noteworthy items and separately, tax only discrete items and the respective effective tax rate are non-GAAP measures, which management uses for analytical purposes to understand the Company’s underlying tax rate. Noteworthy items
are presented in item 5 above, and discussed in various sections of the MD&A. The tax discrete items are discussed in the Income Tax section.
Effective Tax Rate Reconciliation (dollars in millions)
Included within this Form 10-Q are risk-weighted assets (RWA), risk-based capital and leverage ratios as calculated under Basel III capital guidelines. For banking industry regulatory reporting purposes, we report our capital in accordance with Transitional Requirements, but also monitor our
capital based on a fully phased-in methodology. Such measures are considered key regulatory capital measures used by banking regulators, investors and analysts to assess the CIT (as a BHC) regulatory capital position and to compare that to other financial institutions. For information on our capital ratios and requirements, see Note 10 — Regulatory Capital in Item 1. Consolidated Financial Statements, and the Capital section in Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis.
FORWARD-LOOKING
STATEMENTS
Certain statements contained in this document are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the U.S. Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, as amended. All statements contained herein that are not clearly historical in nature are forward-looking and the words “anticipate,”“believe,”“could,”“expect,”“estimate,”“forecast,”“intend,”“plan,”“potential,”“project,”“target” and similar expressions are generally intended to identify forward-looking statements. Any forward-looking statements contained herein, in press releases, written statements or other documents filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission or in communications and discussions with investors and analysts
in the normal course of business through meetings, webcasts, phone calls and conference calls, concerning our operations, economic performance and financial condition are subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties and contingencies. Forward-looking statements are included, for example, in the discussions about:
•
our liquidity risk and capital management, including our capital plan, leverage, capital ratios, and credit ratings, our liquidity plan, and our plans and the potential transactions designed to enhance our liquidity and capital, to repay secured and unsecured debt, to issue qualifying capital instruments, including Tier 1 qualifying preferred stock, and for a return of capital,
•
our
plans to change our funding mix, to access new sources of funding, and to broaden our use of deposit taking capabilities, including increasing our level of commercial deposits and expanding our treasury management services,
•
our pending or potential acquisition and disposition plans, and the integration and restructuring risks inherent in such acquisitions, including our proposed sale of our Financial Freedom reverse mortgage servicing business and reverse mortgage loan portfolio, our Business Air loan portfolio, and Nacco, our European railcar leasing business,
•
our
credit risk management and credit quality,
•
our asset/liability risk management,
•
our funding, borrowing costs and net finance revenue,
•
our operational risks, including risk of operational errors, failure of operational controls, success of systems enhancements and expansion of risk management
and control functions,
•
our mix of portfolio asset classes, including changes resulting from growth initiatives, new business initiatives, new products, acquisitions and divestitures, new business and customer retention,
•
our legal risks, including the enforceability of our agreements, the impact of legal proceedings, and the impact of changes in laws and regulations,
•
our
growth rates, and
•
our commitments to extend credit or purchase equipment.
All forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties, many of which are beyond our control, which may cause actual results, performance or achievements to differ materially from anticipated results, performance or achievements expressed or implied in these statements. Forward-looking statements are based upon management’s estimates of fair values and of future costs, using currently available information. Factors, in addition to those disclosed in “Risk Factors”, that could cause such differences include,
but are not limited to:
•
risks inherent in deposit funding, including reducing reliance on brokered deposits, increasing commercial deposits and savings accounts, and expanding treasury management services,
•
risks inherent in capital markets, including liquidity, changes in market interest rates and quality spreads, and our access to secured and unsecured debt and asset-backed securitization markets,
•
risks
inherent in a return of capital, including risks related to obtaining regulatory approval, the nature and allocation among different methods of returning capital, and the amount and timing of any capital return,
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis and Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk 113
risks
of actual or perceived economic slowdown, downturn or recession, including slowdown in customer demand for credit or increases in non-accrual loans or default rates,
•
industry cycles and trends, including in oil and gas, power and energy, telecommunications, information technology, and commercial and residential real estate.
•
uncertainties associated with risk management, including evaluating credit, adequacy of reserves for credit losses, prepayment risk, asset/liability risk, and interest rate and currency risks,
•
risks
of implementing new processes, procedures, and systems, including those required to strengthen internal controls, improve data quality, and reliability, or comply with the additional laws and regulations applicable to systemically important financial institutions, such as the CCAR process, enhanced prudential standards, and Basel III,
•
risks associated with the value and recoverability of leased equipment and related lease residual values, including railcars, telecommunications towers, technology and office equipment, information technology equipment, including data centers, and large and small industrial, medical, and transportation equipment,
•
risks
of failing to achieve the projected revenue growth from new business initiatives or the projected expense reductions from efficiency improvements,
•
application of goodwill accounting or fair value accounting in volatile markets,
•
regulatory changes and developments, including changes in laws or regulations governing our business and operations, or affecting our assets, including our operating lease equipment or changes in the regulatory environment, whether due to events or factors specific to CIT, or other large multi-national
or regional banks, or the industry in general,
•
risks associated with dispositions of businesses or asset portfolios, including how to replace the income associated with such businesses or asset portfolios and the risk of residual liabilities from such businesses or portfolios,
•
risks associated with acquisitions of businesses or asset portfolios, including integrating and reducing duplication in personnel, policies, internal controls, and systems.
Any
or all of our forward-looking statements here or in other publications may turn out to be wrong, and there are no guarantees regarding our performance. We do not assume any obligation to update any forward-looking statement for any reason.
Under the supervision of and with the participation of management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, we evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures, as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) promulgated under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). Based on such evaluation, and in light of the previously identified material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016, described in our 2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were not
effective as of September 30, 2017.
1.
We have taken and continue to take the necessary steps to remediate the underlying causes of the Home Equity Conversion Mortgages (“HECM”) Interest Curtailment Reserve material weakness. These steps include, but are not limited to the following:
a.
Enhancing the process used to identify and interpret regulatory changes;
b.
Simplification
of and enhanced controls governing the reserve model; and
c.
Correction of historical data integrity issues and implementation of controls over ongoing data changes.
We assessed the design of the key internal controls in the HECM Interest Curtailment Reserve process during the third quarter and determined that the controls were designed effectively and then started testing these controls for operating effectiveness. We will continue to test these key controls in the fourth quarter to demonstrate sustained operating effectiveness over a sufficient time period to remediate the material weakness.
2.
We
have taken and continue to take the necessary steps to remediate the underlying causes of the Information Technology General Controls (“ITGCs”) material weakness. These steps include, but are not limited to the following:
a. Change Management:
i. Ensuring financially relevant applications and key reports used by management are subject to consistent controls for initiation, testing and approval of change activities; and
ii. Reducing or eliminating access that allows direct changes to data and programs in the company’s production environment. Where such access is required, enhancing existing monitoring controls to ensure activity is reviewed and appropriately authorized.
b. Logical Access:
i.
Enhancing logical access processes, tools and controls
c. Computer Operations:
i. Developing and maintaining a comprehensive inventory of all key financial system interfaces and job schedulers used in the Company, and implementing the requisite controls for each
We assessed the design of the key internal controls in the Information Technology General Controls processes during the third quarter and started testing the key internal controls for operating effectiveness. We will continue to test these key controls in the fourth quarter to demonstrate sustained operating effectiveness over a sufficient time period to remediate the material weakness.
We
believe that these efforts will remediate the material weaknesses described above. In addition, as the Company continues to evaluate and work to improve its internal control over financial reporting, we may determine to take additional measures to address these control deficiencies or determine to modify the remediation activities described above.
These actions are subject to ongoing review by our senior management, as well as oversight by the Audit Committee of our Board of Directors. We are placing a high priority on the remediation process and are committed to allocating the necessary resources to the remediation effort. However, we cannot provide any assurance that these efforts will be successful or that they will cause our disclosure controls and procedures or internal control over financial
reporting to be effective.
CHANGES IN INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended September 30, 2017, other than what is described above that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis and Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk 115
CIT is currently involved, and from time to time in the future may be involved, in a number of judicial, regulatory, and arbitration proceedings relating to matters that arise in connection with the conduct of its business
(collectively, “Litigation”), certain of which Litigation matters are described in Note 13 — Contingencies of Item 1. Consolidated Financial Statements. In view of the inherent difficulty of predicting the outcome of Litigation matters, particularly when such matters are in their early stages or where the claimants seek indeterminate damages, CIT cannot state with confidence what the eventual outcome of the pending Litigation will be, what the timing of the ultimate resolution of these matters will be, or what the eventual loss, fines, or penalties related to each pending matter may be, if any. In accordance with applicable accounting guidance, CIT establishes reserves for Litigation when those matters present loss contingencies as to which it is both probable that a loss will occur and the amount of such loss can be reasonably
estimated. Based on currently available information, CIT believes that the results of Litigation that is currently pending, taken together, will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition, but may be material to the Company’s operating results or cash flows for any particular period, depending in part on its operating results for that period. The actual results of resolving such matters may be substantially higher than the amounts reserved.
For more information about pending legal proceedings, including an estimate of certain reasonably possible losses in excess of reserved amounts, see Note 13 — Contingencies
of Item 1. Consolidated Financial Statements.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
For a discussion of risk factors not changed, see Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors, of CIT’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016, and Forward-Looking Statements of this Form 10-Q.
Item 2.
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
There were approximately 4.1 million shares of the Company’s common stock repurchased or acquired through an accelerated repurchase program (ASR) or open market repurchases (OMR) during the quarter ended September 30, 2017 as shown in the following table:
Total
Number of Shares Purchased
Average Price Paid Per Share
Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs
Maximum Number of Shares that May Yet be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs
July 1 - 31, 2017
—
$
—
August
1 - 15, 2017
1,452,119
n/a
1,452,119
August 16 - 31, 2017
1,460,486
$
44.86
1,460,486
September
1 - 30, 2017
1,200,407
$
44.76
1,200,407
Total Purchases
4,113,012
During
the quarter, CIT repurchased a total of $119.3 million in common shares via OMR of 2,660,893 common shares at an average share price of $44.82. We also completed the previously announced ASR, which had commenced in the prior quarter, for which CIT acquired an additional 1,452,119 common shares. The overall average price of the entire ASR was $47.82.
CIT has $106 million of repurchases remaining that can be executed by the end of the first half of 2018 under current authorizations, of which $6 million is eligible for execution in the 2017 fourth quarter.
XBRL Instance Document (Includes the following financial information included in the
Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2017, formatted in XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting Language): (i) the Consolidated Statements of Operations, (ii) the Consolidated Balance Sheets, (iii) the Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity and Comprehensive Income, (iv) the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, and (v) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.)
Indicates a management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.
**
Portions of this exhibit have been omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission as part of an application for granting confidential
treatment pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
***
This information is furnished and not filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and is not incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933.
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.