We caution you that certain important factors (including without limitation those set forth in this Form 20-F) may affect our actual results and could cause such results to differ materially from any forward-looking statements that may be deemed to have been made in this Form 20-F Annual Report, or that are otherwise made by or on our behalf. For this purpose, any statements contained in this annual report that are not statements of historical fact may be deemed to be forward-looking statements. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, words such as "may," "except," "believe," "anticipate," "intend," "could," estimate," or "continue," or the negative or other variations of comparable terminology, are intended to identify forward-looking statements.

The following tables set forth our financial data for the last five years ended December 31. We derived all figures from our financial statements, which were examined by our independent auditors. This information should be read in conjunction with our financial statements included in this annual report.

Our financial statements included in this annual report and the table set forth below, have been prepared in accordance U.S. GAAP. All amounts are expressed in Canadian dollars.

Any investment in our common shares involves a high degree of risk. You should consider carefully the following information before you decide to buy our common shares. If any of the events discussed in the following risk factors actually occurs, our business, financial condition or results of operations would likely suffer. In this case, the market price of our common shares could decline, and you could lose all or part of your investment in our shares. In particular, you should consider carefully the following risk factors:

We have incurred losses in our business operations since inception, and we expect that we will continue to lose money for the foreseeable future. From our incorporation to December 31, 2013, we have incurred net losses totaling $17,011,779. Very few junior resource companies ever become profitable and typically incur large losses until they enter production or are able to sell a mineral property to a major resource company. Failure to achieve and maintain profitability may adversely affect the market price of our common shares.

The business of exploration for minerals and mining involves a high degree of risk. Few properties that are explored are ultimately developed into producing mines. Most exploration projects do not result in the discovery of commercially mineable deposits of ore.

Substantial expenditures will be required for us to establish ore reserves through drilling, to develop metallurgical processes, to extract the metal from the ore and to develop the mining and processing facilities and infrastructure at any site chosen for mining.

Although substantial benefits may be derived from the discovery of a major mineral deposit, no assurance can be given that we will discover minerals in sufficient quantities to justify commercial operations or that we can obtain the funds required for development on a timely basis. The economics of developing precious and base metal mineral properties is affected by many factors including the cost of operations, variations in the grade of ore mined, fluctuations in metal markets, costs of processing equipment and other factors such as government regulations, including regulations relating to royalties, allowable production, importing and exporting of minerals and environmental protection.

Our current operating funds are less than necessary to acquire an interest in, and to conduct exploration on, a mineral property, and therefore we will need to obtain additional financing in order to complete our business plan. As at December 31, 2013, we had cash on hand of $12,948 and a working capital deficiency of $169,900.  Our business plan calls for significant expenses in connection with the acquisition and exploration of mineral claims. We will require additional financing in order to complete these activities. In addition, we will require additional financing to sustain our business operations if we are not successful in earning revenues once we complete exploration on any mineral property we acquire. We do not currently have any arrangements for financing and we can provide no assurance to investors that we will be able to find such financing if required.

We believe the only realistic source of future funds presently available to us is through the sale of equity capital and loans from related parties. Any sale of share capital will result in dilution to existing shareholders.

One of our directors has significant technical training or experience in resource exploration or mining. We rely on the opinions of consulting geologists that we retain from time to time for specific exploration projects or property reviews. As a result of our management's lack of formal training in resource exploration, there may be a higher risk of our being unable to complete our business plan.

Unusual or unexpected rock formations, formation pressures, fires, power outages, labour disruptions, flooding, cave-ins, landslides and the inability to obtain suitable or adequate machinery, equipment or labour are risks involved in the operation of mines and the conduct of exploration programs. We have relied on and will continue to rely upon consultants and others for exploration expertise.

It is not always possible to fully insure against such risks and we may decide not to take out insurance against such risks as a result of high premiums or other reasons. Should such liabilities arise, they could reduce or eliminate any future profitability and result in increasing costs and a decline in the value of our common stock.

Our operations may require licenses and permits from various governmental authorities. There can be no assurance that we will be able to obtain all necessary licenses and permits that may be required to conduct exploration, development and mining operations at any projects we acquire. Furthermore, as mineral projects near completion proper permitting and environmental review may be required.

Factors beyond our control may affect the marketability of any resource we discover. Metal prices have fluctuated widely, particularly in recent years. The effect of these factors cannot accurately be predicted.

The resource industry is intensely competitive in all its phases. We compete with many companies possessing greater financial resources and technical facilities than us for the acquisition of mineral concessions, claims, leases and other mineral interests as well as for the recruitment and retention of qualified employees.

Our operations may be subject to environmental regulations promulgated by government agencies from time to time. Environmental legislation provides for restrictions and prohibitions on spills, release or emissions of various substances produced in association with certain mining industry operations, such as seepage from tailings disposal areas, which would result in environmental pollution. A breach of such legislation may result in the imposition of fines and penalties. In addition, certain types of operations require the submission and approval of environmental impact assessments. Environmental legislation is evolving in a manner, which means that standards, enforcement, fines and penalties for non-compliance are more stringent. Environmental assessments of proposed projects carry a heightened degree of responsibility for us and our directors, officers and consultants. The cost of compliance with changes in governmental regulations has a potential to reduce the profitability of our operations.

Our stock is subject to "penny stock" rules as defined in 1934 Securities and Exchange Act rule 3151-1. The Commission has adopted rules that regulate broker-dealer practices in connection with transactions in penny stocks. Our common shares are subject to these penny stock rules. Transaction costs associated with purchases and sales of penny stocks are likely to be higher than those for other securities. Penny stocks generally are equity securities with a price of less than U.S. $5.00 (other than securities registered on certain national securities exchanges or quoted on the NASDAQ system, provided that current price and volume information with respect to transactions in such securities is provided by the exchange or system).

The penny stock rules require a broker-dealer, prior to a transaction in a penny stock not otherwise exempt from the rules, to deliver a standardized risk disclosure document that provides information about penny stocks and the nature and level of risks in the penny stock market. The broker-dealer also must provide the customer with current bid and offer quotations for the penny stock, the compensation of the broker-dealer and its salesperson in the transaction, and monthly account statements showing the market value of each penny stock held in the customer's account. The bid and offer quotations, and the broker-dealer and salesperson compensation information, must be given to the customer orally or in writing prior to effecting the transaction and must be given to the customer in writing before or with the customer's confirmation.

In addition, the penny stock rules require that prior to a transaction in a penny stock not otherwise exempt from such rules, the broker-dealer must make a special written determination that the penny stock is a suitable investment for the purchaser and receive the purchaser's written agreement to the transaction. These disclosure requirements may have the effect of reducing the level of trading activity in the secondary market for our common shares in the United States and shareholders may find it more difficult to sell their shares.

We were originally incorporated under the name "Entourage Holdings Ltd." pursuant to the Business Corporations Act (British Columbia) on June 16, 1995.  On June 25, 1996, we changed our name to Entourage Mining Ltd.

On February 18, 1998, we became a reporting Issuer as defined under the Securities Act of the Province of British Columbia, Canada.

Our shares commenced trading on February 2, 2004 on the OTC Bulletin Board in the United States under the symbol ETGMF.  On March 6, 2009, we completed a 10 for 1 reverse stock split and our symbol was subsequently changed to ENMGF.   Unless otherwise specified herein, all share information presented herein takes into consideration such reverse stock split.

We do not have any subsidiaries.

We are a reporting issuer in the United States and our Annual Report and 6K filings can be found on the SEC's EDGAR system at www.sec.gov.  We are a reporting issuer in certain Canadian jurisdictions and our required disclosure filings for Canada can be found at www.sedar.com.

We are a natural resource company engaged in the acquisition and exploration of natural resource properties.  We commenced operations in 1996 and currently have mineral property option agreement to acquire:

We also intend to seek and acquire other business enterprises worthy of development.  The Company is reviewing and evaluating several new projects unrelated to the mining industry it had previously focused on.  The Company is currently in negotiations to acquire Phoenix Media, a graphic design, web development, communication and marketing agency (http://phoenix-m.com/).

The mineral property exploration business, in general, is intensively competitive and there is not any assurance that even if commercial quantities of ore are discovered, a profitable market will exist for sale of same. Numerous factors beyond our control may affect the marketability of any substances discovered. These factors include market fluctuations, the proximity and capacity of natural resource markets and processing equipment, government regulations, including regulations relating to prices, taxes, royalties, land tenure, land use, importing and exporting of mineral and environmental protection. The exact effect of these factors cannot be accurately predicted, but the combination of these factors may make it difficult for us to receive an adequate return on investment.

We will compete with many companies possessing greater financial resources and technical facilities for the acquisition of mineral concessions, claims, leases and other mineral interests as well as for the recruitment and retention of qualified employees.

The Company is prospecting for uranium in Quebec. It is anticipated that uranium generated power will become more popular in the decades to come as rising oil prices and political strife in the world's oil producing regions continue.  The price of U₃O₈ (yellow cake) had risen from $7US/lb in 2005 to $135US/lb. in early 2007.  The weekly spot price for U₃O₈ as of May 26, 2014 was US$28.25.

We are subject to the various environmental and business regulations of the jurisdictions in which we conduct mineral exploration.

These regulations can be onerous and, in some cases, expensive to comply with. In particular, we may be required to expend funds to reclaim or restore land disturbed by mineral exploration.

It is possible that we may not be able to afford to comply with various environmental and business regulations in the jurisdictions in which we conduct mineral exploration and would, as a result, have to curtail or cease operations and exploration.

The jurisdictions in which we are presently operating are, in our view, known as jurisdictions that are friendly to mining activity and we believe that we can meet applicable regulatory requirements.

Our President and Chief Executive Officer, Danielle Beauchamp, devotes approximately 50% of her business time to our affairs. Ms. Beauchamp is paid $2,500 per month on a month-to-month basis to attend to the affairs of the Company effective January 1, 2014.

Where necessary, we contract consultants, who in turn employ labourers, to further exploration on our mineral resource properties.

We utilize approximately 700 square feet of office space in Montreal, Canada.  Our rent is approximately $800 per month effective January 1, 2014.

As our properties are not at an advanced stage of exploration, no reserve estimates are made nor are we, as of yet, certain what if any reserves will be on the properties.

The Doran property is located in the southeastern part of Quebec, along the north shore of the Gulf of St. Lawrence, and about 25 kilometres west of Aguanish, approximately 109 kilometres east of Havre St. Pierre. The property extends inland from the Gulf of St Lawrence a distance of approximately 10 kilometres to the north.  Locally this area is known as "Moyenne Cote Nord" or middle coast north of the St. Lawrence Seaway.

The property is situated within the Costebelle Township, NTS map sheet 12 L/08. Access to the property is by daily scheduled flights to Natashquan-Aguanish, then by car from Aguanish to the Pashshibou River and to the southern part of the property.

The topography of the property for the most part is rolling hills having a maximum relief of 100 metres with elevation ranging from sea level to 100 metres. All mineralized areas of interest are located comfortably above sea and river levels.

The climate around the property area is characterized by long winters, generally extending from late October until mid-April.

Exploration, including geological mapping, rock sampling, trenching and shallow drilling on the Doran Uranium Deposit resulted in the estimation of a historical uranium resource which requires verification to conform to Canadian NI 43-101 geological reporting standards. Before these standards were initiated, previous work on the property, done by Aguanish Uranium Inc., Noranda and Lacana Mining, was successful in locating and partially exposing several potential target areas, including the Doran East Centre target where three holes were drilled (1978) 14 feet apart with cores returning values of 6.4, 6.4 and 9.2 Lbs. Per ton uranium (U3 O8).

The Company made a down payment of $35,000 to acquire the option and agreed to a work commitment of $200,000 of exploration in the first year of the Doran Uranium Property agreement.

We expended $245,591 in exploration work on the property in fiscal year 2005 and a National Instrument 43-101 compliant report by Eric Ostensoe (P.Geo.) was commissioned.  In late February 2006, Mr. Ostensoe completed his report and the Company posted the report on SEDAR and EDGAR (March 9, 2006) as well as on our website.  In April 2007 an updated NI 43-101 Technical Report was prepared by Michel Proulx, M.Sc., P. Geo and Michel Boilly, Ph.D., P.Geo, both Qualified Persons as that term is described in National Instrument 43-101, and this report was filed on SEDAR by Abbastar Holdings Ltd. on May 2, 2007.

In May 2006, we advanced to On Track Explorations, the Doran project operator, $150,000 to commence drilling and ground exploration work as outlined in Mr. Ostensoe's report.  Drilling commenced thereafter on the "Main Zone" of the Doran property. Our option agreement on the Doran property required that we expend $300,000 in year two of the agreement.   We spent $346,166 on drilling and exploration in fiscal 2006 and reported drill results on July 20, 2006.  As well, in July 2006, the Government of Quebec reimbursed our company $57,745 as part of the Province's mining exploration incentive program. This rebate was based upon our 2005 drilling exploration expenses.

In early February 2007, we contracted the services of Forages La Virole to commence drilling on the "L" anomaly situated in the north of the Doran property but four to six foot snow drifts prevented the drilling contractor from reaching the "L" anomaly so the work program was cancelled.  On February 13, 2007, we entered into a Mineral Property Option agreement with Abbastar Holdings Ltd. ("Abbastar"), a Vancouver based TSX Venture listed company, whereby Abbastar could earn up to 70% interest in the Doran property by paying us a one time $100,000 CDN payment (paid) and expending $5,000,000 over four years.  The TSX Venture Exchange approved this transaction on May 30, 2007.

On May 11, 2007, our Company and Abbastar announced that drilling had commenced on the "L" anomaly of the Doran project and in all 32 holes were drilled for a total of 3,273.26 metres of diamond drilling and 1158 samples were analyzed representing 2,469.24 linear metres or 75% of the drill hole length.  The results of our Phase II drilling campaign were reported August 23, 2007.  A sample of the results are as follows:

The holes were divided into four zones with particular emphasis on the "L" zone where 18 drill holes were spotted to evaluate the lateral and depth extensions of this zone.  The first four drill holes (17, 17A, 18, 18A) drilled at different azimuths and plunge angles and set up to test the L19 anomaly, recorded encouraging near surface results including 16.99 metres (55 feet) of 0 .87lb/short ton U₃O₈ and 24.1 metres (79 feet) of .66lb/ton U₃O₈, as well, holes 27 and 27A, intersected three and four pegmatites respectively.  The first pegmatite, H27, returned .66lb/ton U₃O₈ over 5.8 metres.  The L zone remains open in all directions while lateral extension and depth extension are unknown.   Best interval drill results are posted on our website.

The 2007 drilling program confirmed the existence of uranium mineralization in the northeast grid (L, N, X and Y).  Findings corroborated the channel sample results of 2006 that showed mineralization to be non-uniformly distributed among the pegmatites and even within each pegmatite.  Drill holes revealed that the thickness of the radioactive pegmatites range from one meter to roughly 20 metres along holes and are presented as sub-parallel multiple slabs slightly dipping to the west and separated from each other by sterile rocks.  All pegmatites have been intersected at a maximum of 90 vertical metres from surface.

To date, the Doran Showing, located at the south of Doran (drilled in 2006 & Fall 2007) and the North East grid have both been successfully drilled in confirming the presence of a series of sub-parallel uranium bearing pegmatites.

Senior Project Geologist, Michel Proulx M. Sc. (P.Geo. and a qualified person, as that term is defined in Canadian Mining National Instrument 43-101 policy) recommended follow up drilling on the Doran Showing (Phase III) as well as an additional 4,000 metres of drilling on the L zone to gain a better understanding of the behavior of the uranium-bearing pegmatite bodies, the structural geology context and of uranium phase minerals.

The fall 2007 drilling campaign was completed in early November of that year.  The program comprised 1,691 metres of drilling in 15 drill holes and was designed to test the area between the North End zone and the Hot Spot zone, the lateral extent of the Hot Spot zone, and to determine the south extension and thickness of the Hill Top pegmatite, all of which are part of the Doran showing.  This campaign was designed to further delineate the Doran Showing where we drilled in the summer of 2006.  The Doran Showing consists of four distinct pegmatite-bearing structures: The Main Zone, the North End Zone, Dyke Zone and Hot Spot.

Results from this drill campaign were announced on February 4, 2008.  The fall 2007 drill campaign achieved similar results to the 2006 campaign and all 15 drill holes encountered uranium mineralization.

In total over 6000 metres have been completed on the Doran property by our company and Abbastar and the companies are encouraged that the goal of delineating a Rossing type (Namibia) uranium deposit may be realized.

Abbastar completed a fall 2008 program in September-October.  This program completed the second phase of the Mineral Option Agreement between Entourage and Abbastar dated February 14, 2007 and Abbastar has now earned a 35% interest in the Doran property.

The fall 2008 exploration campaign consisted of channel sampling of previously unexplored anomalies (F, G, H, I, K and LL) situated WSW of the L anomaly that was drilled in the spring of 2007.  Additionally, anomalies E, Q, BB, S and RR, located due south of the L anomaly were also tested. On February 24, 2009, Abbastar Uranium released the following information on the Fall 2008 exploration program:

Results of the 2008 ground-based radiometric survey demonstrated a good spatial correlation between the highest-count rates and the localization of the previously determined airborne anomalies BB, P, Q, R and S.

The G zone represents the most interesting uranium site with an average value of 0.56 lb/ton U₃O₈ from 22 samples collected with a range of 0.06 to 0.88 U₃O₈ lb/t, with a high value at 3.11 lb/t U₃O₈.

Nearby anomalies F and H also display relatively high uranium values (F at 0.63 lb/t U₃O₈ from six samples with a range of 0.27 to 1.20 U₃O₈ lb/t and H at 0.5 lb/t U₃O₈ from four samples with a range of 0.21 to 1.06 lb/t U₃O₈).

The large extent of the radioactive pegmatite outcrops, the encouraging assay obtained and the proximity of the west zone to the main Doran showing make the former a prime target for future drilling.

The completion of the Fall 2008 exploration program earned Abbastar an additional 15% interest in the property and Abbastar has now earned a 35% interest in the Doran property.  As of December 31, 2010, Abbastar had earned a 35% interest in the Doran property but, has allowed the balance of their option to expire.

Our auditors have issued a going concern opinion. This means that there is substantial doubt that we can continue as an on-going business for the next twelve months unless we obtain additional capital to pay our bills. This is because we have not generated any revenues and no revenues are anticipated until we begin removing and selling minerals. Accordingly, we must raise cash from sources other than the sale of minerals found on the properties. That cash must be raised from other sources. Our only other source for cash at this time is investments by others in our Company.  We must raise cash to implement our project and stay in business. Even if we raise money, we do not know how long the money will last. It depends upon the amount of exploration we conduct and the cost thereof.

We will attempt to raise additional money through a subsequent private placement, public offering or through loans. If we do not raise all of the money we need, we will have to find alternative sources of funding, like a public offering, a private placement of securities, or loans from our officers or others.

Our exploration program is explained in as much detail as possible in the business section of this annual report. We are not going to buy or sell any plant or significant equipment during the next twelve months. We will not buy any equipment until we have located a body of minerals and we have determined they are economical to extract from the land.

Our net income for the year ended December 31, 2013, ("Annual 2013") totaled $28,169 or $0.00 per share, as compared to a net loss of $51,039 or $0.00 per share for the year ended December 31, 2012 ("Annual 2012").  Net income in Annual 2013 compared to a net loss in Annual 2012 was mainly due to:

As of the date of this report, we have yet to generate any revenues from our business operations.

On December 31, 2013, the Company had $12,948 in cash compared to $1,764 on December 31, 2012. On December 31, 2013 the Company had a working capital deficiency of $169,900 compared to a working capital deficiency of $240,569 on December 31, 2012.

We do not need any funds in the near future for the exploration work on our Doran property since the Company is the 65% unencumbered owner of the Doran property. However, we need to raise funds soon to fund our ongoing general and administrative costs (which are estimated at approximately $10,000 per month) although there is no guarantee that we will be able to do so.

The Company anticipates it will require additional capital in the future to finance ongoing exploration of its properties and general and administrative expenses, such capital to be derived from the exercise of outstanding stock options and warrants and/or the completion of private placements.  The Company may also seek short-term loans from directors and shareholders of the Company.  There can be no assurance the Company will be able to obtain required financing in the future on acceptable terms to the Company.

Our Doran mineral property is prospective for uranium.  There are few producers of uranium in the world in a market that is dominated by senior producers Cameco (Canada), Areva (formerly Cogema, France) Energy Resources (Australia), Denison (Canada) and SXR (South Africa). The market for uranium is a homogeneous, integrated commodities market.

The market is not one that is particularly susceptible to the influence of one or more large suppliers or buyers. The world average grade from producing uranium mines is 0.15 per cent U₃O₈, with spot uranium prices having risen from a cyclical low of US$7.10 (U.S.) per pound in late 2000 to US$135/lb. on June 11, 2007.  The weekly spot price for U₃O₈ as at May 26, 2014 was US$28.25/lb.

We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that are material to investors.

Our directors hold office until our next annual meeting of shareholders and until their successors have been elected and qualified. Our officers are elected by our board of directors at our annual meeting after each of our annual meetings of shareholders and hold office until their death, or until they resign or have been removed from office.

The following describes the business experience of our directors and executive officers, including other directorships held in reporting companies:

Mr. Turner holds a B.Sc. degree from the University of British Columbia. He has been a practicing geologist since 1976. Mr. Turner is a member of the Association of Professional Engineers and Geoscientists of British Columbia and a former fellow of the Geological Association of Canada. He has been involved in mineral explorations with major mining companies such as Teck Cominco Limited, Noranda Inc. and Newmont Explorations of Canada Limited. During his career Mr. Turner has worked in British Columbia, the Northwest Territories, Baffin Island, Yukon Territory, Mali, Ghana, Panama, U.S.A and Brazil. Mr. Turner has extensive experience in exploration for base metals, precious metals, and diamonds.

Mr. Schiemann is a Certified Public Accountant in Nevada. He has been involved with many public registrations and structuring of mergers and acquisitions.  Mr. Schiemann received his BS from the University of Illinois, Chicago Circle Campus in 1973 with honors and with a distinction in Accounting. Additionally, he obtained his MBA in Taxation from Golden Gate University, Sacramento campus in 1982.

We are required, under applicable securities legislation in Canada, to disclose to our shareholders details of compensation paid to our directors. The following fairly reflects all material information regarding compensation paid to our directors in our fiscal year ended December 31, 2013

The directors hold office until the next annual general meeting of the shareholders at which time they may stand for re-election. We are required to hold an annual general meeting once in every calendar year and not longer than thirteen months from the last annual general meeting.

No director currently has service contracts with us, nor are they entitled to any termination benefits.

We do not have an executive committee.

Our audit committee is comprised of Danielle Beauchamp and Fouad Mallouk,. Members of the audit committee oversee our accounting and financial reporting process and the audits of our financial statements. The audit committee also receives and addresses complaints regarding accounting, internal controls, and auditing issues. No complaints have been received by us as of the date hereof. Further, the audit committee provides protection for whistle blowers. Again, no whistle blowing issues have presented themselves to us as of the date hereof. The audit committee functions in a collective manner with respect to all issues that come before it.

We have no employees other than our officers and directors. When we engage in exploration of our resource properties, we use geological consultants and contract labor to support them.

The Company Stock Option Plan provides for equity participation in the Company by its directors, officers, employees and consultants through the acquisition of common shares pursuant to the grant of options to purchase common shares. The exercise price for options granted under the Stock Option Plan is determined by the closing trading price on the day immediately preceding the date of grant or such other price as the Directors, in their discretion, may determine. The Company has reserved and authorized 720,000 shares under the Stock Option Plan.  As at December 31, 2013 and the date of this report there are no stock options outstanding.

Options can be exercisable for a term of up to five years, subject to earlier termination in the event of death or the optionee's cessation of services to the Company; and options granted under the stock option plan are non-assignable, except by will or the laws of descent and distribution.

As used in this section, the term "beneficial ownership" with respect to a security is defined by Regulation 228.403 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as consisting of: (1) any person who, directly or indirectly, through any contract, arrangement, understanding, relationship or otherwise has or shares voting power (which includes the power to vote, or to direct the voting of such security) or investment power (which includes the power to dispose, or to direct the disposition of, such security); and (2) any person who, directly or indirectly, creates or uses a trust, proxy, power of attorney, pooling arrangement or any other contract, arrangement or device with the purpose or effect of divesting such person of beneficial ownership of a security or preventing the vesting of such beneficial ownership.

As of the date of this annual report, there are 13,742,223 common shares issued and outstanding in our capital stock. We were authorized to issue 100,000,000 common shares at December 31, 2009; on April 22, 2010, the Company changed its authorized capital to unlimited.

Each of our issued common shares entitles the holder to one vote in general meeting. There are no disproportionate or weighted voting privileges.

We are not controlled directly or indirectly by any other corporation or any other foreign government or by any other natural or legal person, severally or jointly.

There are no arrangements the operation of which at a subsequent date may result in a change in our control.

Our trust and transfer agent is Computershare Trust Company of Canada, which is located at 3^rd Floor – 510 Burrard Street, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada V6C 3B9.

The following financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2013 with comparatives for December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011 (except for the balance sheet, which does not include comparative for December 31, 2011), have been audited by an independent auditor, are accompanied by an audit report and are attached and incorporated herein:

Incorporated herewith are the comparative financial statements covering the latest three financial years, audited in accordance with a comprehensive body of auditing standards.

We have not had any export sales in our latest financial year ended December 31, 2013 and, as a result, the percentage of export sales for the Company was zero.

Management is not aware of any material proceedings in which any director, any member of management or any of the Company's affiliates are a party adverse to, or have a material interest adverse to, our company.

We have not paid dividends on the common shares in any of its last five fiscal years. The directors of our company will determine if and when dividends should be declared and paid in the future based on the Company's financial position at the relevant time. All of the common shares of our company are entitled to an equal share in any dividends declared and paid.

There have been no significant changes, as that term is defined in the rules and policies governing the use of the Form 20F, since the date of the audited financial statements included herein.

Our shares commenced trading on February 2, 2004 on the OTC Bulletin Board in the United States under the symbol ETGMF.  On March 6, 2009, we completed a 10 for 1 reverse stock split and our symbol was subsequently changed to ENMGF.

Our shares commenced trading on February 2, 2004 on the OTC Bulletin Board in the United States under the symbol ETGMF, however, a lack of liquidity may make it difficult to resell shares.

On March 6, 2009 we completed a 10 for 1 reverse stock split and our symbol was subsequently changed to ENMGF.

There are no plans, proposals, arrangements or understandings with any person with regard to the development of a trading market in any of our securities.

We have no bylaws under British Columbia law.  We have Articles of Incorporation.  A summary of certain provisions of our Articles of Incorporation is provided below.

There is no law or governmental decree or regulation in Canada that restricts the export or import of capital, or affects the remittance of dividends, interest or other payments to a non-resident holder of common shares, other than withholding tax requirements. See "Item 10.E Taxation".

There is no limitation imposed by Canadian law or by our constituent documents on the right of a non-resident to hold or vote common shares, other than are provided in the Investment Canada Act (Canada). The following summarizes the principal features of the Investment Canada Act (Canada).

The Investment Canada Act (Canada) requires certain "non-Canadian" individuals, governments, corporation or other entities who wish to acquire a "Canadian business" (as defined in the Investment Canada Act), or establish a "new Canadian business" (as defined in the Investment Canada Act) to file either a notification or an application for review with a governmental agency known as "Investment Canada". The Investment Canada Act requires that certain acquisition of control of Canadian business by a "non-Canadian" must be reviewed and approved by the Minister responsible for the Investment Canada Act on the basis that the Minister is satisfied that the acquisition is "likely to be of net benefit to Canada", having regard to criteria set forth in the Investment Canada Act. Only acquisitions of control are reviewable under the Investment Canada Act; however, the Investment Canada Act provides detailed rules for the determination of whether control has been acquired and, pursuant to those rules, the acquisition of one-third or more of the voting shares of a corporation may, in some circumstances, be considered to constitute an acquisition of control. Certain reviewable acquisitions of control may not be implemented before being approved by the Minister; if the Minister does not ultimately approve a reviewable acquisition, which has been completed, the acquired Canadian business must be divested. Failure to comply with the review provisions of the Investment Canada Act could result in, amongst other things, an injunction or a court order directing disposition of assets of shares.

The following is a general discussion of the material United States Federal income tax law for U.S. holders that hold such common shares as a capital asset, as defined under United States Federal income tax law and is limited to discussion of U.S. Holders that own less than 10% of the common stock. This discussion does not address all potentially relevant Federal income tax matters and it does not address consequences peculiar to persons subject to special provisions of Federal income tax law, such as those described below as excluded from the definition of a U.S. Holder. In addition, this discussion does not cover any state, local or foreign tax consequences.

The following discussion is based upon the sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended to the date hereof (the "Code"), Treasury Regulations, published Internal Revenue Service ("IRS") rulings, published administrative positions of the IRS and court decisions that are currently applicable, any or all of which could be materially and adversely changed, possibly on a retroactive basis, at any time. In addition, this discussion does not consider the potential effects, both adverse and beneficial, of any future legislation that, if enacted, could be applied, possibly on a retroactive basis, at any time. The following discussion is for general information only and it is not intended to be, nor should it be construed to be, legal or tax advice to any holder or prospective holder of common shares of the Company and no opinion or representation with respect to the United States Federal income tax consequences to any such holder or prospective holder is made. Accordingly, holders and prospective holders of common shares of the Company should consult their own tax advisors about the Federal, state, local, and foreign tax consequences of purchasing, owning and disposing of common shares of the Company.

As used herein, a "U.S. Holder" is a holder of common shares of the Company who or which is a citizen or individual resident (or is treated as a citizen or individual resident) of the United States for federal income tax purposes, a corporation or partnership created or organized (or treated as created or organized for federal income tax purposes) in the United States, including only the States and District of Columbia, or under the law of the United States or any State or Territory or any political subdivision thereof, or a trust or estate the income of which is includable in its gross income for federal income tax purposes without regard to its source, if, (i) a court within the United States is able to exercise primary supervision over the administration of the trust and (ii) one or more United States trustees have the authority to control all substantial decisions of the trust.

For purposes of this discussion, a U.S. Holder does not include persons subject to special provisions of Federal income tax law, such as tax-exempt organizations, qualified retirement plans, financial institutions, insurance companies, real estate investment trusts, regulated investment companies, broker-dealers and Holders who acquired their stock through the exercise of employee stock options or otherwise as compensation.

U.S. Holders receiving dividend distributions (including constructive dividends) with respect to common shares of the Company are required to include in gross income for United States Federal income tax purposes the gross amount of such distributions to the extent that the Company has current or accumulated earnings and profits, without reduction for any Canadian income tax withheld from such distributions. Such Canadian tax withheld may be credited, subject to certain limitations, against the U.S. Holder's United States Federal income tax liability or, alternatively, may be deducted in computing the U.S. Holder's United States Federal taxable income by those who itemize deductions. (See more detailed discussion at "Foreign Tax Credit" below). To the extent that distributions exceed current or accumulated earnings and profits of the Company, they will be treated first as a return of capital up to the U.S. Holder's adjusted basis in the common shares and thereafter as gain from the sale or exchange of the common shares. Preferential tax rates for long-term capital gains are applicable to a U.S. Holder that is an individual, estate or trust. There are currently no preferential tax rates for long-term capital gains for a U.S. Holder that is a corporation.

Dividends paid on the common shares of the Company will not generally be eligible for the dividends received deduction provided to corporations receiving dividends from certain United States corporations. A U.S. Holder which is a corporation may, under certain circumstances, be entitled to a 70% deduction of the United States source portion of dividends received from the Company if such U.S. Holder owns shares representing at least 10% of the voting power and value of the Company. The availability of this deduction is subject to several complex limitations, which are beyond the scope of this discussion.

A U.S. Holder who pays (or has withheld from distributions) Canadian income tax with respect to the ownership of common shares of the Company may be entitled, at the option of the U.S. Holder, to either a deduction or a tax credit for such foreign tax paid or withheld. Generally, it will be more advantageous to claim a credit because a credit reduces United States Federal income taxes on a dollar-for-dollar basis, while a deduction merely reduces the taxpayer's income subject to tax. This election is made on a year-by-year basis and applies to all foreign taxes paid by (or withheld from) the U.S. Holder during that year. There are significant and complex limitations, which apply to the credit, among which is the general limitation that the credit cannot exceed the proportionate shares of the U.S. Holder's United States income tax liability that the U.S. Holder's foreign source income bears to his or its world-wide taxable income. In the determination of the application of this limitation, the various items of income and deduction must be classified into foreign and domestic sources. Complex rules govern this classification process. There are further limitations on the foreign tax credit for certain types of income such as "passive income," "high withholding tax interest," "financial services income," "shipping income" and certain other classifications of income. The availability of the foreign tax credit and the application of the limitations on the credit are fact specific and holders and prospective holders of common shares of the Company should consult their own tax advisors regarding their individual circumstances.

A U.S. Holder will recognize gain or loss upon the sale of common shares of the Company equal to the difference, if any, between the amount of cash plus the fair market value of any property received, and the Holder's tax basis in the common shares of the Company. This gain or loss will be capital gain or loss if the common shares are a capital asset in the hands of the U.S. Holder. Any capital gain will be a short-term or long-term capital gain or loss depending upon the holding period of the U.S. Holder. Gains and losses are netted and combined according to special rules in arriving at the overall capital gain or loss for a particular tax year. Deductions for net capital losses are subject to significant limitations. For U.S. Holders that are individuals, any unused portion of such net capital loss may be carried over to be used in later tax years until such net capital loss is thereby exhausted. For U.S. Holders which are corporations (other than corporations subject to Subchapter S of the Code), an unused net capital loss may be carried back three years from the loss year and carried forward five years from the loss year to be offset against capital gains until such net capital loss is thereby exhausted.

The following discussion summarizes the principal Canadian federal income tax considerations generally applicable to a person who owns one or more common shares of the Company (the "Shareholder"), and who at all material times for the purposes of the Income Tax Act (Canada) (the "Canadian Act") deals at arm's length with the Company, holds all common shares solely as capital property, is a non-resident of Canada, and does not, and is not deemed to, use or hold any Common share in or in the course of carrying on business in Canada. It is assumed that the common shares will at all material times be listed on a stock exchange that is prescribed for the purposes of the Canadian Act.

This summary is based on the current provisions of the Canadian Act, including the regulations thereunder, and the Canada-United States Income Tax Convention (1980) (the "Treaty") as amended. This summary takes into account all specific proposals to amend the Canadian Act and the regulations thereunder publicly announced by the government of Canada to the date hereof and the Company's understanding of the current published administrative and assessing practices of Canada Customs and Revenue Agency. It is assumed that all such amendments will be enacted substantially as currently proposed, and that there will be no other material change to any such law or practice, although no assurances can be given in these respects. Except to the extent otherwise expressly set out herein, this summary does not take into account any provincial, territorial or foreign income tax law or treaty.

This summary is not, and is not to be construed as, tax advice to any particular Shareholder. Each prospective and current Shareholder is urged to obtain independent advice as to the Canadian income tax consequences of an investment in common shares applicable to the Shareholder's particular circumstances.

A Shareholder generally will not be subject to tax pursuant to the Canadian Act on any capital gain realized by the Shareholder on a disposition of a Common share unless the Common share constitutes "taxable Canadian property" to the Shareholder for purposes of the Canadian Act and the Shareholder is not eligible for relief pursuant to an applicable bilateral tax treaty. A Common share that is disposed of by a Shareholder will not constitute taxable Canadian property of the Shareholder provided that the Common share is listed on a stock exchange that is prescribed for the purposes of the Canadian Act (the Toronto Stock Exchange is so prescribed), and that neither the Shareholder, nor one or more persons with whom the Shareholder did not deal at arm's length, alone or together at any time in the five years immediately preceding the disposition owned, or owned any right to acquire, 25% or more of the issued shares of any class of the capital stock of the Company. In addition, the Treaty generally will exempt a Shareholder who is a resident of the United States for the purposes of the Treaty, and who would otherwise be liable to pay Canadian income tax in respect of any capital gain realized by the Shareholder on the disposition of a Common share, from such liability provided that the value of the Common share is not derived principally from real property (including resource property) situated in Canada or that the Shareholder does not have, and has not had within the 12-month period preceding the disposition, a "permanent establishment" or "fixed base," as those terms are defined for the purposes of the Treaty, available to the Shareholder in Canada. The Treaty may not be available to a non-resident Shareholder that is a U.S. LLC, which is not subject to tax in the U.S. Any dividend on a Common share, including a stock dividend, paid or credited, or deemed to be paid or credited, by the Company to a Shareholder will be subject to Canadian withholding tax at the rate of 25% on the gross amount of the dividend, or such lesser rate as may be available under an applicable income tax treaty. Pursuant to the Treaty, the rate of withholding tax applicable to a dividend paid on a Common share to a Shareholder who is a resident of the United States for the purposes of the Treaty will be reduced to 5% if the beneficial owner of the dividend is a company that owns at least 10% of the voting stock of the Company, and in any other case will be reduced to 15%, of the gross amount of the dividend. It is Canada Customs and Revenue Agency's position that the Treaty reductions are not available to a Shareholder that is a "limited liability company" resident in the United States. The Company will be required to withhold any such tax from the dividend, and remit the tax directly to Canada Customs and Revenue Agency for the account of the Shareholder.

Our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 2013, pursuant to Rule 13a-15(b) of the Exchange Act.  Based on this evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that the Company's disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of December 31, 2013.

The management of the Company is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as required by Sarbanes-Oxley (SOX) Section 404 A. The Company's internal control over financial reporting is a process designed under the supervision of the Company's Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of the Company's financial statements for external purposes in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

As of December 31, 2013, management assessed the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting based on the criteria for effective internal control over financial reporting established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission ("COSO") and SEC guidance on conducting such assessments.  Based on that evaluation, they concluded that, during the period covered by this report, such internal controls and procedures were not effective to detect the inappropriate application of US GAAP rules as more fully described below. This was due to deficiencies that existed in the design or operation of our internal control over financial reporting that adversely affected our internal controls and that may be considered to be material weaknesses.

The matters involving internal controls and procedures that the Company's management considered to be material weaknesses under COSO and SEC rules were: (1) lack of a functioning audit committee and lack of a majority of independent directors on the Company's board of directors, resulting in ineffective oversight in the establishment and monitoring of required internal controls and procedures; (2) inadequate segregation of duties consistent with control objectives; (3) insufficient written policies and procedures for accounting and financial reporting with respect to the requirements and application of US GAAP and SEC disclosure requirements; and (4) ineffective controls over period end financial disclosure and reporting processes. The aforementioned material weaknesses were identified by the Company's Chief Financial Officer in connection with the preparation of our financial statements as of December 31, 2013 and communicated the matters to our management and board of directors.

Management believes that the material weaknesses set forth in items (2), (3) and (4) above did not have an affect on the Company's financial results. However, management believes that the lack of a functioning audit committee and lack of a majority of independent directors on the Company's board of directors, resulting in ineffective oversight in the establishment and monitoring of required internal controls and procedures, could impact the Company's financial statements for the future years.

We are committed to improving our financial organization. As part of this commitment, we hope to create a position to segregate duties consistent with control objectives and will increase our personnel resources and technical accounting expertise within the accounting function when funds are available to the Company: i) Appointing one or more outside directors to our board of directors who shall be appointed to the audit committee of the Company resulting in a fully functioning audit committee who will undertake the oversight in the establishment and monitoring of required internal controls and procedures; and ii) Preparing and implementing sufficient written policies and checklists which will set forth procedures for accounting and financial reporting with respect to the requirements and application of US GAAP and SEC disclosure requirements.

Management believes that the appointment of one or more independent directors, who shall be appointed to a fully functioning audit committee, will remedy the lack of a functioning audit committee and a lack of a majority of outside directors on the Company's Board. In addition, management believes that preparing and implementing sufficient written policies and checklists will remedy the following material weaknesses (i) insufficient written policies and procedures for accounting and financial reporting with respect to the requirements and application of US GAAP and SEC disclosure requirements; and (ii) ineffective controls over period end financial close and reporting processes. Further, management believes that the hiring of additional personnel who have the technical expertise and knowledge will result in proper segregation of duties and provide more checks and balances within the department. Additional personnel will also provide the cross training needed to support the Company if personnel turn over issues within the department occur. This coupled with the appointment of additional outside directors will greatly decrease any control and procedure issues the company may encounter in the future.

Any effort to increase the size of the Board of Directors, appoint independent directors or personnel is conditional upon the Company to raise additional capital.

We will continue to monitor and evaluate the effectiveness of our internal controls and procedures and our internal controls over financial reporting on an ongoing basis and are committed to taking further action and implementing additional enhancements or improvements, as necessary and as funds allow.

This annual report does not include an attestation report of the Company's registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Our management's report was not subject to attestation by the Company's registered public accounting firm because our Company is not an accelerated filer or large accelerated filer.

We do not have an audit committee financial expert serving on our audit committee. Given the Company's small size and limited operations, to date we have been unable to attract a financial expert to serve on our board of directors.

We have a written Code of Ethics, which was filed as an exhibit to our Annual Report on Form 20-F for our fiscal year ended December 31, 2007, and which is incorporated by reference as an exhibit hereto.

The aggregate fees billed for each of the last two fiscal years for professional services rendered by the Company's principal accountant(s) for the audit of the Company's annual financial statements, together with services that are normally provided by the principal accountant in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements were $10,000 for the year ended December 31, 2013 and $12,000 for the year ended December 31, 2012.

The aggregate fees billed for each of the last two fiscal years for assurance and related services by the principal accountant that were reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of the Company's financial statements but are not reported under paragraph (a) of this Item were $Nil for the year ended December 31, 2013 and $Nil for year December 31, 2012.

The aggregate fees billed in each of the last two fiscal years for professional services rendered by the principal accountant for tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning and tax return preparation were $Nil for the year ended December 31, 2013 and $Nil for the year ended December 31, 2012.

The aggregate fees billed in each of the last two fiscal years for products and services provided by the principal accountant other than services disclosed in paragraphs (a) through (c) of this Item were $Nil for the year ended December 31, 2013 and $Nil for the year ended December 31, 2012.

No purchase was made by or on behalf of our Company or any "affiliated purchaser" of any of our equity securities within the past two years.

Our financial statements are attached hereto immediately before the signatures section.

See Item 17.