SEC Info - Securus Technologies, Inc. - ‘10-Q’ for 6/30/08

Page	(sequential)	\|	(alphabetic)	Top
		Alternative Formats (Word, et al.) Controls and Procedures Defaults Upon Senior Securities Exhibits Financial Information Financial Statements Legal Proceedings Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation Other Information Part I -- Financial Information Part Ii -- Other Information Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk Risk Factors Submission of Matters to A Vote of Security Holders Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
1	1st Page - Filing Submission
"	Part I -- Financial Information
"	Item 1. Financial Statements
"	Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation
"	Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
"	Item 4. Controls and Procedures
"	Part Ii -- Other Information
"	Item 1. Legal Proceedings
"	Item 1A. Risk Factors
"	Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
"	Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
"	Item 4. Submission of Matters to A Vote of Security Holders
"	Item 6. Exhibits

[ X ] Quarterly report pursuant to sections 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

o Transition report pursuant to section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 For The Transition Period From _____ to _____

(Address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of Registrant’s principal executive offices)

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [ X ] No o

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act (Check one):

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

No established published trading market exists for either the common stock, par value $0.001 per share, of Securus Technologies, Inc. or the Class B common stock, par value $0.001 per share, of Securus Technologies, Inc.

	December 31,			June 30,
	2007			2008
				(Unaudited)
ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents	$	2,072		$	4,305
Restricted cash		1,535			1,560
Accounts receivable, net		50,788			44,798
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		5,437			7,026
Deferred income taxes		3,034			3,032
Total current assets		62,866			60,721
Property and equipment, net		40,797			37,198
Intangibles and other assets, net		119,427			110,845
Goodwill		69,035			68,159
Total assets	$	292,125		$	276,923

LIABILITIES , REEDEMABLE, CONVERTIBLE PREFERRED STOCK AND STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT
Accounts payable	$	28,161		$	25,120
Due to related party		1,000			3,610
Accrued liabilities		40,188			39,212
Deferred revenue and customer advances		16,674			14,690
Current deferred tax		1,261			1,223
Total current liabilities		87,284			83,855
Deferred income taxes		15,352			14,809
Due to related party		3,510			-
Long-term debt		263,276			274,669
Other long-term liabilities		1,593			1,704
Total liabilities		371,015			375,037

Commitments and contingencies

Series A redeemable convertible preferred stock, $2,000 stated value, total redemption value $10,200 and $10,851 at December 31, 2007 and June 30, 2008; 5,100 shares authorized and outstanding at December 31, 2007 and June 30, 2008		9,971			10,653

Stockholders’ deficit:
Common stock, $0.001 par value, 1,290,000 shares authorized;
677 and 69,165 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2007 and June 30, 2008		7			7
Additional paid-in capital		35,620			34,955
Accumulated other comprehensive income		1,935			1,173
Accumulated deficit		(126,423	)		(144,902	)
Total stockholders’ deficit		(88,861	)		(108,767	)
Total liabilities, redeemable, convertible preferred stock and stockholders’ deficit	$	292,125		$	276,923

	For the Three Months Ended									For The Six Months Ended
		June 30,						June 30,			June 30,				June 30,
		2007						2008			2007				2008
					(unaudited)							(unaudited)
Revenue:
Direct call provisioning			$	87,691			$	84,727		$	178,837			$	169,625
Solution services				9,335				6,216			19,934				13,193
Offender management software				-				7,426			-				11,615
Telecommunication services				1,999				1,373			4,365				2,796
Equipment sales and other				139				31			240				216
Total revenue				99,164				99,773			203,376				197,445
Cost of service (exclusive of depreciation and amortization shown separately below):
Direct call provisioning, exclusive of bad debt expense				58,773				57,958			120,065				115,782
Direct call provisioning bad debt expense				11,158				6,876			21,445				14,239
Solutions services expense				6,222				4,006			13,627				8,459
Offender management software expense				-				4,014			-				6,679
Telecommunications services expense				885				846			1,937				1,487
Cost of equipment sold and other				89				19			175				197
Total cost of service				77,127				73,719			157,249				146,843
Selling, general and administrative				14,889				15,886			28,286				31,973
Restructuring costs				614				-			614				224
Depreciation and amortization expense				9,106				8,656			17,591				17,254
Total operating costs and expenses				101,736				98,261			203,740				196,294
Operating income (loss)				(2,572		)		1,512			(364		)		1,151
Patent litigation settlement, net of expenses				-				(118	)		-				(118	)
Interest and other expenses, net				7,569				9,389			14,787				19,573
Loss before income taxes				(10,141		)		(7,759	)		(15,151		)		(18,304	)
Income tax expense				528				774			894				175
Net loss				(10,669		)		(8,533	)		(16,045		)		(18,479	)
Accrued dividends on redeemable convertible preferred stock				-				(335	)		-				(683	)
Net loss available to common stockholders			$	(10,669		)	$	(8,868	)	$	(16,045		)	$	(19,162	)

	June 30,			June 30,
	2007			2008
	(Unaudited)
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net loss	$	(16,045	)	$	(18,479	)
Adjustment to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		17,591			17,254
Amortization of fair value of contracts acquired		-			1,829
Deferred income taxes		713			(294	)
Non-cash interest expense		5,500			6,063
Equity loss from unconsolidated affiliate		102			-
Stock-based compensation		39			18
Amortization of deferred financing costs and debt discounts		847			1,623
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Restricted cash		(37	)		(25	)
Accounts receivable		1,205			5,906
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		1,179			(1,627	)
Intangible and other assets		(653	)		(64)
Accounts payable		(4,822	)		(6,256	)
Accrued liabilities and other liabilities		1,380			(2,729	)
Net cash provided by operating activities	$	6,999		$	3,219

CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Purchase of property and equipment including costs of intangibles	$	(11,588	)	$	(8,740	)
Cash consideration paid for acquired business		(43,671	)		-
Property insurance proceeds		88			-
Net cash used in investing activities	$	(55,171	)	$	(8,740	)

CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Proceeds from issuance of second-priority senior secured notes	$	39,060		$	-
Advances on revolving credit facility, net		12,533			4,893
Cash overdraft		868			3,233
Debt issuance costs		(4,920	)		-
Advance from or (payment to) related party		5,000			(900	)
Net cash provided by financing activities	$	52,541		$	7,226
Effect of exchange rates on cash and cash equivalents		-			528
Increase in cash and cash equivalents	$	4,369		$	2,233
Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the period		558			2,072
Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the period	$	4,927		$	4,305

SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES:
Cash paid during period for:
Interest	$	8,772		$	11,019
Income taxes	$	164		$	780
Non-cash consent fee	$	400		$	-

Note 1 – Description of Business and Significant Accounting Policies and Practices

Securus Technologies, Inc. and subsidiaries (“Securus” or the “Company”) provide inmate telecommunications services and software solutions to correctional facilities operated by city, county, state and federal authorities and other types of confinement facilities in 47 states and the District of Columbia. Securus also provides offender management and other software solutions to U.S. and foreign correctional facilities and law enforcement agencies. The Company was incorporated in Delaware on January 12, 2004, and on March 3, 2004 and September 9, 2004, the Company acquired all of the outstanding equity interests of T-Netix, Inc. (“T-Netix”) and Evercom Holdings, Inc. (“Evercom”), respectively. On June 29, 2007, the Company acquired Syscon Holdings, Ltd. and certain of its affiliates (“Syscon”). Syscon was included in the results of operations beginning on June 29, 2007.

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2008 have been prepared in accordance with U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and notes required by U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles for complete financial statements of Securus. In the opinion of management, all adjustments necessary for a fair presentation have been included and are of a normal and recurring nature. Interim results are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year. The condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in Securus’ December 31, 2007 Annual Report on Form 10-K, as amended.

Certain amounts in the June 30, 2007 condensed consolidated financial statements have been reclassified to conform to current period presentation. This reclassification had no impact on operating income (loss), net loss, cash flows or the financial position of the Company for the prior periods presented.

The preparation of unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reported period. Significant items subject to such estimates include the valuation allowances for receivables, accrued telecom expenses, the carrying amount for property and equipment, goodwill, intangible and other assets, and deferred income taxes. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

On January 1, 2007, the Company reduced its estimate of the useful life of certain telecommunications equipment to reflect the installation, over the next several years, of our packet-based architecture. This change increased net loss by $1.0 million and $0.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2008, respectively.

The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, T-Netix, Evercom, and Syscon. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

The Company accounts for income taxes under the provisions of SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes (“SFAS No. 109”). Under SFAS No. 109, deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of transactions and events are determined based on the difference between the financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse.

The Company’s unrecognized tax benefits as of June 30, 2008 amounted to $1.0 million, including interest and penalties of $0.1 million. The amount of unrecognized tax benefits that would impact the effective rate, if recognized, would be $70,000. The Company does not anticipate a significant change to the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits over the next twelve months.

The Company files income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction, Canada, the United Kingdom, Australia and various states. The Company has open tax years for the U.S. federal return from 1996 forward with respect to its net operating loss (“NOL”) carryforwards, where the IRS may not raise tax for these years, but can reduce NOLs. Otherwise, with few exceptions, the Company is no longer subject to federal, foreign, state, or local income tax examinations for years prior to 2004.

The Company recognizes potential accrued interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense. For the quarter ended and year to date June 30, 2008, the Company recognized $20,000 in potential interest with respect to unrecognized tax benefits.

In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurement (“SFAS No. 157”), which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in GAAP and expands disclosure about fair value measurements. This statement does not require any new fair value measurements; rather, it applies whenever other accounting pronouncements require or permit fair value measurements. The provisions of this statement are to be applied prospectively as of the beginning of the fiscal year in which this statement is initially applied, with any transition adjustment recognized as a cumulative-effect adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings. The Company adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 157 on January 1, 2008 for financial assets and liabilities. Adoption of the standard for financial assets and liabilities on January 1, 2008 did not impact the Company’s accounting measurements but is ultimately expected to result in additional disclosures for both financial and nonfinancial assets and liabilities. In February 2008, the FASB issued Staff Position No. FAS 157-2, Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157, which delays the effective date of SFAS No. 157 for one year for all nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities, except those that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on at least an annual basis. The Company will be required to adopt SFAS No. 157 in the first quarter of fiscal year 2009 for nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities. The Company is currently assessing the impact SFAS No. 157 will have in relation to nonfinancial assets and liabilities on its consolidated financial statements.

In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities — Including an amendment of FASB Statement No. 115 (“SFAS No. 159”), which permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value. The objective of SFAS No.159 is to improve financial reporting by providing entities with the opportunity to mitigate volatility in reported earnings caused by measuring related assets and liabilities differently without having to apply complex hedge accounting provisions. The Company has elected not to adopt the SFAS No. 159 fair value measurement option nor would the adoption of this Statement have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

business combination. This statement applies prospectively to business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2008. Early adoption of SFAS No. 141R is prohibited. Acquisitions accounted for as a business combination that are completed January 1, 2009 and thereafter will be impacted by this new standard.

On June 11, 2008, the Company entered into an agreement with Mr. Richard A. Smith to appoint him as the Chief Executive Officer and elect him as a member of the Company’s Board of Directors, effective on June 23, 2008. Mr. Richard Falcone resigned as Chief Executive Officer on June 23, 2008 but will remain as Chairman of the Board of Directors until January 5, 2009.

Mr. Smith’s employment agreement will extend through July 1, 2012 and provides that Mr. Smith will be granted 57,072.61 shares of Class B Common Stock, subject to the vesting requirements in his restricted stock agreement.

On June 20, 2008, the Company entered into an agreement with Mr. William D. Markert to appoint him as Chief Financial Officer, effective June 30, 2008. Mr. Markert’s employment agreement extends through July 1, 2012 and provides that Mr. Markert will receive 11,414.52 shares of the Company’s Class B Common Stock, subject to the vesting requirements in his restricted stock agreement.

Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 130, Reporting Comprehensive Income, requires that certain items such as foreign currency translation adjustments and unrealized gains and losses on certain derivative instruments classified as a hedge be presented as separate component of shareholders’ equity. Total comprehensive loss for the three months ended June 30, 2007 and 2008 was $10.7 million and $8.3 million, respectively. Total comprehensive loss for the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2008 was $16.0 million and $19.2 million, respectively.

On June 29, 2007, the Company acquired all of the outstanding capital stock of Syscon pursuant to a Stock Purchase Agreement dated April 11, 2007 (“Purchase Agreement”). The initial consideration for Syscon’s capital stock was $41 million in cash and 45.6 shares of Securus Common Stock, subject to a working capital adjustment. In addition, the Company agreed to pay up to an additional $7 million after each of the first three 12 month periods after the closing date if Syscon’s revenues exceeded certain thresholds and the former stockholder still remained an employee. These additional payments, if made, will be reflected as compensation expense in the statement of operations. No additional consideration was recognized as of June 30, 2008 as the revenue threshold related to the first 12 month period was not met.

Pursuant to the Purchase Agreement, Syscon’s previous stockholder left $5.0 million of cash in Syscon’s bank accounts upon the closing of the Syscon acquisition. The Company agreed to pay Syscon’s previous stockholder up to $5.0 million as Syscon generates Net Cash Flow (as defined in the Purchase Agreement). Approximately $0.4 million was paid in 2007, $0.9 million was paid during the six months ended June 30, 2008, and the remaining $3.6 million is expected to be paid within the next year.

The acquisition has been accounted for as a purchase in accordance with SFAS No. 141, Business Combinations. Under the purchase method of accounting, the total purchase price has been allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed of Syscon based on their respective fair values. An allocation of the purchase costs has been made for major categories of assets and liabilities in the consolidated balance sheet based on estimates of fair values reflecting valuations prepared by third-party appraisers. The value of intangible assets was determined using a discounted net cash flow approach. The fair value of the common stock Securus issued to Syscon’s previous shareholder was estimated using the option-pricing method, whereby the fair value of stock is modeled as a series of call options, representing the present value of the

expected future returns to shareholders. Under this method, each class of stock is modeled with a distinct claim on the shareholders' equity value in Securus, creating three call options with various liquidation preference values that represent significant milestones for our shareholders. The value of these three call options are then calculated utilizing the Black-Scholes option pricing model. Any final adjustments to the purchase price or the estimated fair values of the assets purchased will change the allocations of purchase price and could result in changes to the unaudited pro forma and actual consolidated financial statements, and the changes could be material.

The total purchase price for Syscon was $45.1 million, as shown below, and has been allocated as follows (in thousands):

The following unaudited pro forma combined amounts give effect to the acquisition of Syscon as if the acquisition had occurred on January 1, 2007. The pro forma amounts do not purport to be indicative of what would have occurred had the acquisition been made as of the beginning of the period or of results which may occur in the future.

	December 31,			June 30,
	2007			2008
				(Unaudited)
Accounts receivable, net:
Trade accounts receivable	$	59,684		$	51,287
Advance commissions receivable		2,347			1,411
Other receivables		263			223
		62,294			52,921
Less allowance for doubtful accounts		(11,506	)		(8,123	)
	$	50,788		$	44,798

At December 31, 2007 and June 30, 2008, the Company had advanced commissions to certain facilities totaling $2.3 million and $1.4 million, respectively, which are recoverable from such facilities as a reduction of earned commissions for specified monthly amounts. Amounts included in the accounts receivable represent the estimated recoverable amounts during the next fiscal year.

Direct call provisioning bad debt expense for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007 was $11.2 million, or 12.8 %, and $21.4 million, or 12.0%, respectively, of direct call provisioning revenue of $87.7 million and $178.8 million. Direct call provisioning bad debt expense for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 was $6.9 million, or 8.1%, and $14.2 million, or 8.4%, respectively, of direct call provisioning revenue of $84.7 million and $169.6 million.

	December 31,			June 30,
	2007			2008
				(Unaudited)
Property and equipment, net:
Telecommunications equipment	$	58,302		$	60,757
Leasehold improvements		3,555			3,981
Construction in progress		4,639			4,185
Office equipment		15,721			16,624
		82,217			85,547
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization		(41,420	)		(48,349	)
	$	40,797		$	37,198

	December 31, 2007
		Gross						Weighted
		Carrying		Accumulated				Average
		Value		Amortization			Net	Life
Patents and trademarks	$	25,240	$	(6,952	)	$	18,288	10.2
Deferred financing costs		14,275		(3,585	)		10,690	6.1
Capitalized software development costs		23,900		(11,021	)		12,879	3.9
Custom software development costs		8,115		(406	)		7,709	10.0
Acquired contract rights		99,098		(32,997	)		66,101	9.5
Deposits and long-term prepayments		2,089		-			2,089
Non-compete and employee agreements		1,909		(238	)		1,671	4.6
	$	174,626	$	(55,199	)	$	119,427

	June 30, 2008 (Unaudited)
		Gross						Weighted
		Carrying		Accumulated				Average
		Value		Amortization			Net	Life
Patents and trademarks	$	25,223	$	(7,788	)	$	17,435	9.1
Deferred financing costs		14,309		(4,771	)		9,538	6.1
Capitalized software development costs		25,681		(12,711	)		12,970	4.5
Custom software development costs		8,052		(850	)		7,202	10.0
Acquired contract rights		99,970		(40,031	)		59,939	9.7
Deposits and long-term prepayments		2,369					2,369
Non-compete and employee agreements		1,852		(460	)		1,392	4.3
	$	177,456	$	(66,611	)	$	110,845

At December 31, 2007 and June 30, 2008, the carrying amount of trademarks assigned to patents and trademarks that were not subject to amortization was $2.8 million.

Amortization expense for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007 was $4.6 million (of which $0.3 million was included in interest expense), and $9.2 million (of which $0.5 million was included in interest expense), respectively. Amortization expense for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 was $4.8 million (of which $0.6 million was included in interest expense), and $9.6 million (of which $1.2 million was included in interest expense), respectively. Estimated amortization expense related to intangibles and other assets, excluding deferred financing costs, the fair value of acquired Syscon in-process operating contracts and other assets, at June 30, 2008, and for each of the next five years through June 30, 2013, and thereafter, is summarized as follows (in thousands):

The fair value of Syscon’s in-process operating contracts and customer agreements acquired of $5.2 million will be amortized against revenue over the remaining life of the contracts using the percentage of completion method of accounting in accordance with EITF No. 01-3, Accounting in a Business Combination for Deferred Revenue of an Acquiree, which is estimated to be over the next 18 months from the date of acquisition. As of June 30, 2008, $3.2 million was amortized. The fair value represents the remaining amount to be billed under the acquired contractual obligations reduced by the estimated direct and indirect costs to complete and an allowance for the normal profit margin related to the activities to be performed.

	December 31,		June 30,
	2007		2008
			(Unaudited)
Accrued expenses	$	24,849	$	24,461
Accrued compensation		5,507		5,495
Accrued facility exit costs		321		261
Accrued taxes		2,240		1,777
Accrued interest and other		7,271		7,218
	$	40,188	$	39,212

Restructuring charges of $0.2 million were incurred and paid during the first quarter of 2008 related to the realignment of our field service organization because of efficiencies gained from our packet-based architecture, which we began to install in 2006 and will continue to install as customer contracts are renewed. No restructuring charges were incurred during the second quarter of 2008.

Restructuring charges of $0.6 million were incurred in 2007 related to the consolidation of our internal customer care function into the Dallas office, comprised of $0.2 million of severance expense and $0.4 million of facility exit costs for our Selma, Alabama location. All of the severance expenses were paid during the second quarter of 2007. The remaining leased facility and other costs reserve is expected to be utilized by 2010.

Goodwill allocated to our reportable segments is summarized as follows (in thousands):

				Offender
		Direct Call		Management
		Provisioning		Software			Total
Balance at December 31, 2006	$	37,936	$	-		$	37,936
Goodwill allocation in connection with Syscon acquisition		-		28,948			28,948
Foreign currency translation		-		2,151			2,151
Balance at December 31, 2007	$	37,936	$	31,099		$	69,035
Foreign currency translation		-		(876	)		(876	)
Balance at June 30, 2008	$	37,936	$	30,223		$	68,159

Revolving Credit Facility — The Company has a revolving credit facility with a syndicate of banks and other lending institutions with a borrowing base limitation equal to 80% of “eligible” receivables and 50% of “eligible” inventory, as defined in the credit agreement. The revolving credit facility provides for financing on a revolving basis of up to $30.0 million and a $22.5 million letter of credit facility that expires on September 9, 2009. Letters of credit outstanding reduce the Company’s availability to the extent they exceed $10.0 million and the borrowing base collateral falls below $40 million. The borrowing base collateral is principally comprised of receivables and inventory less defined reserves. Subject to certain adjustments, the Company’s maximum permitted annual capital expenditures are $22.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2008. Amounts unused under the revolving credit facility are subject to a fee, due quarterly, based on a per annum rate of 0.375%. Advances bear simple interest at an annual rate at an option equal to one of the following, (i) the Prime Rate or (ii) a rate equal to the Eurodollar Rate as adjusted by the Eurodollar Reserve Percentage plus 2.0%. Interest is payable following the end of each calendar quarter. Advances received on the revolving credit facility bore interest at the Company’s option using the prime rate, which was 7.25% and 5.00% at December 31, 2007 and June 30, 2008, respectively, and advances based on the Eurodollar Rate bore interest of 6.97% and 4.48% as of December 31, 2007 and June 30, 2008, respectively. The Company draws from the available credit on the Revolver to cover normal business cash requirements. As of December 31, 2007 and June 30, 2008, the Company had $19.5 million and $11.5 million, respectively, of borrowing availability under the Revolver.

Second-Priority Senior Secured Notes — On September 9, 2004, the Company issued $154.0 million of 11% Second-priority Senior Secured Notes. These notes were issued at a discount of $3.6 million, or 97.651% of face value, and the proceeds were used to finance the acquisition of Evercom and to repay then outstanding long-term debt obligations. On June 29, 2007, the Company issued $40 million aggregate

principal amount of our 11% Second-priority Senior Secured Notes due 2011 under an Indenture dated September 9, 2004, as amended on June 27, 2007 (“the 2007 Notes”). The 2007 Notes were issued at a discount of $0.9 million, or 97.651% of face value, and the proceeds were used to finance the acquisition of Syscon.

All $194.0 million of principal is due September 9, 2011. To the extent the Company generates excess cash flow (as defined in the indenture) in any calendar year, the Company is required by the Second-priority Senior Secured Notes to offer to repay principal equal to 75% of such excess cash flow at a rate of 104% of face value. No excess cash flow payment was due for the year ended December 31, 2007 because no excess cash flow was generated. Interest is payable semiannually on March 1 and September 1. The effective interest rate is 11.5% on the Second-priority Senior Secured Notes.

Senior Subordinated Notes — On September 9, 2004, the Company issued $40.0 million of Senior Subordinated Notes, unsecured and subordinate to the revolving credit facility, that bear interest at an annual rate of 17%. Interest is payable at the end of each calendar quarter, or, as restricted by our revolving credit facility, is paid-in-kind by adding accrued interest to the principal balance of the Senior Subordinated notes. All outstanding principal, including interest paid-in-kind, is due on September 9, 2014 and a mandatory prepayment equal to $20.0 million plus 50% of all outstanding interest paid-in-kind is due on September 9, 2013. In connection with the issuance of the Senior Subordinated Notes, the Company issued warrants to acquire 51 shares of our Common Stock at an exercise price of $10 per share to the Senior Subordinated Note holders. As a result, the Company discounted the face value of the Senior Subordinated Notes by $2.9 million representing the estimated fair value of the warrants at the time of issuance. Proceeds obtained from the issuance of the Senior Subordinated Notes were used to finance the acquisition of Evercom, repay outstanding long-term debt obligations, and for general operating purposes. During the six months ended June 30, 2008, $6.1 million of paid-in-kind interest was added to the principal balance of the Senior Subordinated Notes. The effective interest rate is 18.54% on the Senior Subordinated Notes. In order to enter into additional financing to complete the Syscon acquisition in 2007, the Company incurred a non-cash consent fee of $0.4 million payable to the Senior Subordinated Noteholders. This fee was added to the principal balance of the Senior Subordinated Notes.

All of the Company’s domestic subsidiaries and certain of its foreign subsidiaries (the “Subsidiary Guarantors”) are fully, unconditionally, and jointly and severably liable for the revolving credit facility, Senior Subordinated Notes and Second-priority Senior Secured Notes. The Subsidiary Guarantors are wholly-owned. The Company has not included separate financial statements of their subsidiaries because of their (a) aggregate assets, liabilities, earnings and equity are presented on a consolidated basis and (b) the Company believes that separate financial statements and other disclosures concerning subsidiaries are not material to investors.

The Company’s credit facilities contain financial and operating covenants, among other items, that require the maintenance of certain financial ratios, including specified interest coverage ratios, maintenance of minimum levels of operating cash flows (as defined), and maximum capital expenditure limitations. These covenants also limit the Company’s ability to incur additional indebtedness, make certain payments including dividends to shareholders, invest and divest company assets, and sell or otherwise dispose of capital stock. In the event that the Company fails to comply with the covenants and restrictions, as specified in the credit agreements, it may be in default, at which time payment of the long term debt and unpaid interest may be accelerated and become immediately due and payable. In December 2007, the Company issued $10.2 million of Series A Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock primarily to the Company’s majority stockholder, H.I.G. T-Netix, Inc. (“H.I.G.”), to avoid a default under the indenture for its 11% Second-priority Senior Secured Notes. There is no guarantee that the proceeds of the issuance will prevent a future default under our credit facilities. Based on our current and expected level of operations, we believe our cash flow from operations, available cash and available borrowings under our $30.0 million working capital facility will be adequate to make required capital expenditures and to service our indebtedness and meet our other working capital needs for at least twelve months from our balance sheet dated June 30, 2008. We cannot assure you, however, that our available sources of cash will be sufficient to enable us to make such capital expenditures, service our indebtedness or to fund our other working capital needs. Further, in the event we wish to make additional acquisitions, we may need to seek additional financing. As of December 31, 2007 and June 30, 2008, the Company was in compliance with all covenants.

SFAS No. 131, Disclosures About Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information (“SFAS No. 131”), establishes standards for reporting operating segments in annual financial statements. SFAS No. 131 also establishes standards for disclosures about products and services, geographic areas and major customers.

The Company has chosen to organize the enterprise around differences in products and services. The Company has five reportable segments: Direct Call Provisioning, Solutions Services, Telecommunications Services, Offender Management Software and Equipment Sales. Through these segments, the Company provides inmate telecommunication products and services for correctional facilities, including security enhanced call processing, call validation and billing services for inmate calling, and software solutions to manage and monitor inmate, parole and probation activity. Depending upon the contractual relationship at the site and the type of customer, the Company provides these products and services primarily through direct contracts between the Company and correctional facilities. A smaller portion of our business is provided through wholesale service agreements with other telecommunications service providers and system sales to certain telecommunications providers.

The Company evaluates performance of each segment based on operating results. Total assets are those owned by or allocated to each segment. Assets included in the “Corporate and Other” column of the following table include all assets not specifically allocated to a segment. There are no intersegment sales. The Company’s reportable segments are specific business units that offer different products and services and have varying operating costs associated with such products. The accounting policies of the reportable segments are the same as those described in the summary of significant accounting policies. The Company uses estimation to allocate certain direct costs and selling, general and administrative costs, as well as for depreciation and amortization, goodwill, and capital expenditures. Estimation is required in these cases because the Company does not have the capability to specifically attribute such costs to a particular segment. The estimation is based on relevant factors such as proportionate share of revenue of each segment to the total business.

Segment information for the six months ended June 30, 2007 (unaudited) is as follows (in thousands):

		Direct				Offender				Equipment
		Call		Solutions		Management		Telecommunications		Sales		Corporate
		Provisioning		Services		Software		Services		& Other		& Other			Total
Revenue from external customers	$	178,837	$	19,934	$	-	$	4,365	$	240	$	-		$	203,376
Segment gross margin	$	37,327	$	6,307	$	-	$	2,428	$	65	$	-		$	46,127
Depreciation and amortization		16,184		562		-		783		-		62			17,591
Other operating costs and expenses		4,191		186		-		-		-		24,523			28,900
Operating income (loss)	$	16,952	$	5,559	$	-	$	1,645	$	65	$	(24,585	)		(364	)
Interest and other expenses, net															14,787
Segment loss before income taxes															(15,151	)
Capital expenditures	$	11,549	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	39		$	11,588
June 30, 2007:
Total assets	$	211,032	$	18,045	$	67,344	$	1,170	$	-	$	25,434		$	323,025
Goodwill	$	37,936	$	-	$	26,306	$	-	$	-	$	-		$	64,242

Segment information for the six months ended June 30, 2008 (unaudited) is as follows (in thousands):

		Direct				Offender					Equipment
		Call		Solutions		Management			Telecommunications		Sales		Corporate
		Provisioning		Services		Software			Services		& Other		& Other			Total
Revenue from external customers	$	169,625	$	13,193	$	11,615		$	2,796	$	216	$	-		$	197,445
Segment gross margin	$	39,604	$	4,734	$	4,936		$	1,309	$	19	$	-		$	50,602
Depreciation and amortization		14,288		982		1,922			-		-		62			17,254
Other operating costs and expenses		2,509		161		4,128			-		-		25,399			32,197
Operating income (loss)	$	22,807	$	3,591	$	(1,114	)	$	1,309	$	19	$	(25,461	)		1,151
Interest and other expenses, net																19,455
Segment loss before income taxes																(18,304	)
Capital expenditures	$	8,277	$	-	$	59		$	-	$	-	$	404		$	8,740
June 30, 2007:
Total assets	$	189,427	$	11,847	$	58,648		$	4,485	$	8	$	12,508		$	276,923
Goodwill	$	37,936	$	-	$	30,223		$	-	$	-	$	-		$	68,159

Segment information for the three months ended June 30, 2007 (unaudited) is as follows (in thousands):

		Direct						Equipment
		Call		Solutions		Telecommunications		Sales		Corporate
		Provisioning		Services		Services		& Other		& Other			Total
Revenue from external customers	$	87,691	$	9,335	$	1,999	$	139	$	-		$	99,164
Segment gross margin	$	17,760	$	3,113	$	1,114	$	50	$	-		$	22,037
Depreciation and amortization		8,553		281		241		-		31			9,106
Other operating costs and expenses		2,066		112		-		-		13,325			15,503
Operating income (loss)	$	7,141	$	2,720	$	873	$	50	$	(13,356	)		(2,572	)
Interest and other expenses, net													7,569
Segment loss before income taxes													(10,141	)
Capital expenditures	$	6,480	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	36		$	6,516

Segment information for the three months ended June 30, 2008 (unaudited) is as follows (in thousands):

		Direct				Offender				Equipment
		Call		Solutions		Management		Telecommunications		Sales		Corporate
		Provisioning		Services		Software		Services		& Other		& Other			Total
Revenue from external customers	$	84,727	$	6,216	$	7,426	$	1,373	$	31	$	-		$	99,773
Segment gross margin	$	19,893	$	2,210	$	3,412	$	527	$	12	$			$	26,054
Depreciation and amortization		7,334		330		960		-		-		32			8,656
Other operating costs and expenses		161		-		2,123		-		-		13,602			15,886
Operating income (loss)	$	12,398	$	1,880	$	329	$	527	$	12	$	(13,634	)		1,512
Interest and other expenses, net															9,271
Segment loss before income taxes															(7,759	)
Capital expenditures	$	4,237	$	-	$	34	$	-	$	-	$	396		$	4,667

As of June 30, 2008, the Company had 5,100 shares of Series A Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock (“Preferred Stock”), which was issued in December 2007. Each share of the Preferred Stock has a stated value of $2,000 and accrues dividends annually at 12.5% of the stated value. The Preferred Stock has a liquidation preference equal to the greater of its per share purchase price plus any accrued but unpaid dividends and the amount the holder would receive if such share were converted to shares of common stock. At the election of the Board of Directors, the Company may redeem pro rata from all holders of Preferred Stock at any time on or after January 1, 2010, some or all of the shares outstanding on the date of redemption. The redemption price will be equal to the greater of the liquidation amount or the fair market value as of the redemption date.

Each share of Preferred Stock initially was convertible into one share of common stock but such conversion ratio was to be adjusted for certain events. If the Company did not achieve $45 million of Credit Facility Cash Flow (as defined in the Certificate of Designation for the Preferred Stock) for the twelve months ended June 30, 2008, the holders would have the right to convert each share of Preferred Stock into 200 shares of Common Stock, as adjusted for certain events. For the twelve month period ended June 30, 2008, the Company did not achieve the $45 million threshold for the Credit Facility Cash Flow as designated in the Certificate of Designation. As a result, each share of Preferred Stock is now convertible into 200 shares of Common Stock, as adjusted for certain events. The intrinsic value of the conversion option was zero as the fair value of the Common Stock was less than the conversion price at the commitment date.

The Preferred Stock was issued in part to avoid a financial covenant default under the Company’s indenture for the 11% Second-Priority Senior Secured Notes (See Note 5), and the Company’s majority stockholder, H.I.G., purchased substantially all of the shares of Preferred Stock for approximately $10.2 million. The proceeds from the purchase were applied to earnings in determining compliance with the covenants in the indenture for the quarters ended December 31, 2007 through June 30, 2008. The Company accrues dividends on the Preferred Stock; however the Company’s credit facilities contain financial and operating covenants which limit the ability to make dividend payments to shareholders. As of June 30, 2008, the Company had accrued but unpaid dividends of $0.7 million for the Series A Preferred Stock.

The Company’s shareholders approved a 1 for 1,000 reverse stock split for the Common Stock and Class B Common Stock on December 15, 2007, in conjunction with the issuance of the Preferred Stock. All shares, options and warrants have been restated to give retroactive effect to the reverse split. All per share disclosures retroactively reflect shares outstanding or issuable as though the split had occurred as of December 31, 2006. In connection with the reverse split, authorized shares of common stock were reduced to 1,300,000 shares of capital stock with a par value of $0.001, of which 1,190,000 were designated Class A Common Stock, 10,000 were designated Preferred Stock, of which 5,100 were designated as Series A Convertible Preferred Stock, and 100,000 were designated Class B Common Stock. All issued shares of common stock are entitled to vote on a one share/one vote basis.

As of June 30, 2008, 604.0 shares of Class A Common Stock were issued and outstanding and 68,560.62 shares of the Class B Common Stock were outstanding. Shares of Class B Common Stock are subject to vesting as described below. Other than provisions related to vesting and a $57,000 per share liquidation preference for the Common Stock, holders of the shares of Common Stock and Class B Common Stock have identical rights and privileges. The Company’s credit facilities substantially restrict the ability to pay dividends to holders of common stock.

The holders of the Senior Subordinated Notes hold warrants to purchase 51.01 shares of Common Stock. The warrant exercise price is $10 per share, is immediately exercisable upon issuance, and expires on September 9, 2014. As a result, we discounted the face value of the Senior Subordinated Notes by $2.9 million representing the estimated fair value of the stock warrants at the time of issuance.

In conjunction with a guarantee provided by H.I.G., we issued warrants to purchase 14.54 shares of Common Stock to H.I.G., for $0.01 per share, immediately exercisable upon issuance. The warrants were exercised in December 2007.

The Company has a 2004 Restricted Stock Purchase Plan under which certain of its employees may purchase shares of our Class B Common Stock. The maximum number of authorized shares that may be delivered pursuant to awards granted under the 2004 Restricted Stock Purchase Plan was 75,000, which equaled 5.8% of our total authorized shares of common stock. On December 15, 2007, our shareholders approved a 1 for 1,000 reverse stock split; however the Company elected to continue to authorize 75,000 shares under the Plan.

The Company’s Board of Directors administers the 2004 Restricted Stock Purchase Plan. The plan is designed to serve as an incentive to attract and retain qualified and competent employees. The per share purchase price for each share of Class B Common Stock is determined by the Company’s Board of Directors. Class B Common Stock will vest based on performance criteria or ratably over a period or periods, as provided in the related restricted stock purchase agreement.

On June 20, 2008, the Company entered into an agreement with Mr. William Markert to appoint him as Chief Financial Officer, effective June 30, 2008. Mr. Markert’s employment agreement extends through July 1, 2012 and provides that Mr. Markert will receive 11,414.52 of restricted shares of the Company’s Class B Common Stock.

As of June 30, 2008, 68,560.62 shares of Class B Common Stock were issued under the 2004 Restricted Stock Purchase Plan. Of this amount, (a) 57,072.61 of these shares were issued to our new Chief Executive Officer (b) 11,414.52 shares were issued to our new Chief Financial Officer (c) 26.3 of these shares were acquired by the Chairman of the Board of the Directors in 2004; (d) 31.82 were issued in 2005 to seven of our executives, net of forfeitures; (e) 1.330 and 2.67 shares were issued in 2005 and 2006 to two members of the Company’s Board of Directors and immediately vested; and (f) 11.37 were issued in 2007 to certain of our executives.

These shares are subject to forfeiture pursuant to the terms of the 2004 Restricted Stock Purchase Plan and the restrictions described hereafter. As to shares issued to the Company’s executives, with respect to 36.6% of the stock, the restriction period ends upon the sale of the Company’s stock by certain of its other stockholders. The restriction period for 31.7% of the stock ends upon the lapse of time, ratably over three to four years from the date of issue. With respect to the remaining shares, the restriction period ends upon the Company attaining certain performance measures determined by its Board of Directors. Upon a change of control, the restriction period could end for all of the restricted shares that have not previously vested. The restricted shares are entitled to dividends, if declared, which will be distributed upon termination of the restriction period with respect to any such restricted shares.

The Company measures compensation expense on these restricted shares commensurate with their vesting schedules. For the portion of the restricted shares that vest contingently with the occurrence of certain events, the Company records compensation expense when such events become probable. The incremental compensation expense on the restricted shares issued was determined based on the estimated fair value of the Class B Common Stock, which resulted in $39,000 and $18,000 in compensation expense charged to the consolidated statement of operations for six months ended June 30, 2007 and June 30, 2008, respectively.

From time to time we have been, and expect to continue to be, subject to various legal and administrative proceedings or various claims in the normal course of business. We believe the ultimate disposition of these matters will not have a material affect on our financial condition, liquidity, or results of operations.

From time to time, inmate telecommunications providers, including Securus, are parties to judicial and regulatory complaints and proceedings initiated by inmates, consumer protection advocates or individual called parties alleging, among other things, that excessive rates are being charged with respect to inmate collect calls, that commissions paid by inmate telephone service providers to the correctional facilities are too high, that a call was wrongfully disconnected, that security notices played during the call disrupt the call, that the billed party did not accept the collect calls for which they were billed or that rate disclosure was not provided or was inadequate. We are also on occasion the subject of regulatory complaints regarding our compliance with various matters including tariffing, access charges and payphone compensation requirements and rate disclosure issues.

In June 2000, T-NETIX was named, along with AT&T, in a lawsuit in the Superior Court of King County, Washington, in which two private citizens allege violations of state rules requiring pre-connect audible disclosure of rates as required by Washington statutes and regulations. T-Netix and other defendants successfully obtained dismissal and a "primary jurisdiction" referral in 2002. In 2005, after several years of inactivity before the Washington Utilities and Transportation Commission (“WUTC”), the state telecommunications regulatory agency, T-Netix prevailed at the trial court in securing an Order entering summary judgment on grounds of lack of standing, but that decision was reversed by an intermediate Washington state appellate court in December 2006. T-Netix’s subsequent Petition for Review by the Washington Supreme Court was denied in January 2008, entitling Plaintiffs to continue to pursue their claims against T-Netix and AT&T. This matter was referred to the WUTC on the grounds of primary jurisdiction, in order for the WUTC to determine various regulatory issues. AT&T withdrew its motion for summary judgment. On May 22, 2008, AT&T filed a cross-claim against T-Netix seeking indemnification. T-Netix has filed a motion to dismiss AT&T’s cross-claim. Given the absence of any

significant judicial discovery to date, however, we cannot estimate the company's potential exposure or predict the outcome of this dispute.

In September 2004, TIP Systems, LLC and TIP Systems Holdings Co., Inc. (“TIPS”) filed suit in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas (Houston Division) against numerous defendants including us. In TIPS, we, along with other inmate telecommunications providers, were alleged to have infringed on patents concerning “cord-free” or “hands-free” inmate phone technology. This lawsuit against us was dismissed on March 1, 2007, when our motion for summary judgment was granted on the issue of non-infringement. TIPS appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals and oral arguments before the Appellate Court occurred on April 9, 2008. On June 18, 2008, the appellate court affirmed the summary judgment. Until the expiration of the time period during which TIPS may appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court, this matter remains pending. We cannot estimate the company's potential exposure or predict the likelihood of any outcomes at this time. Additionally, the TIPS entities have filed a lawsuit in the Southern District of Texas against us which alleges substantially similar allegations concerning patent infringement claims for “cord-free” or “hands-free” inmate phone technology. This lawsuit against us was similarly dismissed on January 10, 2008, when our motion for summary judgment was granted on the issues of non-infringement and a finding that Securus was not a proper defendant in the lawsuit. Although TIPS attempted to appeal this Order to the U.S. Court of Appeals, the attempt was premature due to issues that remain pending in the district court case. On June 24, 2008, the trial court entered a final judgment dismissing all claims against the Company. We believe the time period during which TIPS may appeal this final judgment has expired.

In October 2003, Value-Added Communications, Inc. (“VAC”) filed suit in the District Court of Dallas County, Texas against T-NETIX for alleged breach of a Patent License Agreement between VAC and T-NETIX (the “License Agreement”). VAC filed the lawsuit seeking, among other things, an interpretation of certain provisions of the License Agreement, a declaration that the License Agreement remains in effect, a license to any of T-NETIX’s improvements to the originally licensed technology, and an award of its attorneys’ fees. T-NETIX filed counter-claims against VAC for, among other things, VAC’s breach of various provisions of the License Agreement including, but not limited to, failure to assign certain improvements in technology that VAC has allegedly developed since 1996. Trial started on January 15, 2008 and went through February 8, 2008. After several days of deliberation, the jury announced that they were deadlocked, and the judge granted a mistrial on February 14, 2008. On August 1, 2008, VAC entered into a Settlement Agreement and Mutual Release and an Amended and Restated Patent License Agreement with us. The parties are in the process of filing the appropriate documentation with the Court to dismiss the suit with prejudice.

In April 2005, we filed suit in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas (Dallas Division) against VAC for patent infringement. VAC filed an answer and a counterclaim in this matter. VAC sought declaratory judgments as to non-infringement and invalidity. Trial in this matter had been set for February 2, 2009. On August 1, 2008, VAC entered into a Settlement Agreement and Mutual Release. The parties are in the process of filing the appropriate documentation with the Court to dismiss the suit with prejudice.

In November 2005, we filed suit in the District Court of Dallas County, Texas, against AGM Telecom Corporation and former employees of our various affiliates, and related individuals, including David McEvilly, George McNitt, Thomas Miller, Steven Capitano, Brian Dietert, AGM Telecom Corporation, Christopher McNitt, Robert G. Sargeant, James F. Winstead, Pablo Xiques, Henry Chang, and Mie Mie Chang, alleging, among other things, breach of contract and misappropriation of trade secrets. In the lawsuit, various defendants have counterclaimed for alleged violations of the Texas Business & Commerce Code, disparagement, defamation, and tortious interference. Some defendants moved to stay the case and requested the court compel arbitration of the matter, which request was granted, and some defendants filed special appearances objecting to the court’s jurisdiction. In January 2008, the Court granted the special appearances of Sargeant, Winstead and Chang, due to their lack of contacts with Texas and dismissed them from the case. The parties have since agreed to abate the state court litigation and submit all claims between the Company and the remaining defendants to arbitration. The arbitration was filed April 15, 2008. We

have denied any wrongdoing with respect to the alleged counterclaims. In May 2008, all of the parties entered into a confidential settlement agreement, and the suit was dismissed with prejudice.

In October 2006, we filed suit in the U.S. Federal District Court for the Eastern District of Texas against Global Tel*Link Corporation; AGM Telecom Corporation; Inmate Calling Solutions, Inc.; and FSH Communications, LLC for patent infringement of various patents related to the inmate correctional services and telecommunications industry by each such defendant. In November, 2007, Inmate Calling Solutions, Inc. entered into a Settlement Agreement and Mutual Release, and a Patent License Agreement with us, and was dismissed from the suit. In May, 2008, AGM Telecom Corporation entered into a Settlement Agreement with us, and was dismissed with prejudice from the suit. On August 1, 2008, Global Tel*Link Corporation entered into a Settlement Agreement and Mutual Release and a Patent License, Covenant not to Sue and Non-Assertion Agreement with us. The parties are in the process of filing the appropriate documentation with the Court to dismiss the suit against Global Tel*Link Corporation with prejudice.

In May 2007, Global Tel*Link Corporation (“GTL”) and Verizon Business (“Verizon”) filed formal protest petitions against the Florida Department of Corrections (“FDOC”) (the “Protests”). The Protests challenged FDOC’s intended award to us of a five-year initial term contract for provision of Statewide Inmate Telephone Services. More specifically, the Protests sought entry of recommended and final orders either (1) awarding the contract to the protestors or (2) rejecting all proposals. The Protests were referred to the Florida Division of Administrative Hearings (“DOAH”), and we intervened as a co-respondent with FDOC. Following a formal hearing, DOAH entered a recommended order to approve the intended contract award to us; in turn FDOC adopted the recommendation in its final order. GTL and Verizon appealed the final order and sought a stay to prevent entry of a formal contract between us and FDOC during the appeal. The court denied the stay and the FDOC Contract was executed on September 25, 2007. GTL and Verizon nevertheless have continued to prosecute their appeal. Oral argument before the appeals court occurred on June 24, 2008. On August 4, 2008, the appeals court entered an order reversing the final order entered by the FDOC on the basis of a violation of due process, finding that the Secretary of the FDOC who adopted the DOAH recommended order was not impartial since he was the person who had initially made the decision to award the contract to our company and was a testifying witness in the formal hearings of the DOAH. The order is not final until the time expires to file a motion for rehearing. The case was remanded to the FDOC for further proceedings consistent with the opinion. We cannot estimate the Company's potential exposure or predict the likelihood of any outcome at this time.

In July 2007, Global Tel*Link Corporation filed suit in the Circuit Court of Montgomery County against T-Netix Inc., the State of Alabama, and the Alabama Department of Finance and Alabama Department of Corrections. This proceeding relates to the protest matter Global Tel* Link filed in Alabama in May 2007, which was concluded in April 2008. We filed a Motion to Dismiss which was denied; however, GTL conceded that several of its claims were not viable, and in its amended complaint included only one count, the intentional interference with business and contractual relations claim. Both parties agreed that the appeal of the Alabama Protest Matter could be dispositive, or at least highly persuasive, of the outcome of this second lawsuit; therefore, the Judge agreed to postpone setting any scheduling deadlines and recently postponed the trial date of August 4, 2008. The Judge also ordered the parties to mediate the case but did not specify a deadline. There has not been any activity in this case since the ruling in the companion matter on April 11, 2008. T-Netix has not admitted any wrongdoing and has vigorously denied each and every allegation in the case. No prediction of the likelihood of any outcome or reasonable estimate of range of potential loss can be made at this time.

In March 2007, the FCC asked for public comment on a proposal from an inmate advocacy group to impose a federal rate cap on interstate inmate calls. This proceeding could have a significant impact on the rates that we and other companies in the inmate telecommunications industry may charge. Similar proposals have been pending before the FCC for more than four years without action by the agency. This newest proceeding remains under review by the FCC and has received strong opposition from the inmate telecommunications industry. We cannot predict the outcome at this time.

In February 2008, the Company entered into an agreement with a telecommunications vendor, primarily for local and long distance services, whereby we guarantee a minimum annual purchase commitment over a three year period. Management has reviewed the guarantee and believes the fair value to be zero. The maximum amount that can be paid under this guarantee totaled $1.9 million annually at June 30, 2008.

Effective April 1, 2008, Ms. Carlyn Taylor was elected to the Company’s Board of Directors. Ms. Taylor is currently a Senior Managing Director at FTI Consulting (“FTI”), an international financial consulting firm engaged by the Company to perform certain financial and business consulting services. Pursuant to its agreement with the Company, FTI receives a fee of between $15,000 and $40,000 per month depending on the number of consulting hours it provides to the Company. Management has recently taken steps to reduce the maximum charge from FTI to approximately $15,000 per month. Additionally, FTI is eligible to receive up to a two percent equity interest in the Company if the Company achieves certain performance goals.

On August 1, 2008, the Company entered into settlement agreements and mutual releases regarding several outstanding patent matters. See Note 9 – Legal Proceedings for a discussion of each of these matters.

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATION

The following discussion and analysis of the Company’s financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with our historical consolidated financial statements and related notes, our audited consolidated financial data and related notes and other financial information included elsewhere in this Form 10-Q. Certain information contained in the discussion and analysis set forth below includes forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. See “Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements.”

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the federal securities laws. These forward-looking statements reflect, among other things, our current expectations, plans and strategies, and anticipated financial results, all of which are subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties and factors that may cause our actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements. Many of these risks are beyond our ability to control or predict. Any statements contained in this quarterly report that are not statements of historical fact, including statements about our beliefs and expectations, are forward-looking statements and should be evaluated as such. The words “anticipates,” “believes,” “expects,” “intends,” “seeks to,” “plans,” “estimates,” “targets,” “projects,” “should,” “may,” “will” and similar words and expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. All forward-looking statements are based on information available to the Company on the date hereof, and investors should not rely on forward-looking statements because they are subject to a variety of risks, uncertainties, and other factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from our expectations, and we expressly do not undertake any duty to update forward-looking statements. These factors include, but are not limited to: (i) competition in our industry and in the telecommunications industry generally; (ii) our substantial amount of debt; (iii) our accumulated deficits; (iv) our financial results being dependent on the success of our billing and bad debt management systems; (v) loss of major partners or customers and recent trends in the inmate telecommunications industry and the risks of government contracts; (vi) protection of our proprietary technology and ensuring that we do not infringe on the proprietary technology of other companies; (vii) our ability to adapt new technologies and

respond effectively to customer requirements or provide new products and services; (viii) control by our equity investors; (ix) our ability to adapt to changes in state and federal regulations that apply to the inmate

telecommunications industry; (x) extensive government legislation and regulations; and (xi) other factors detailed from time to time in our filings with the SEC.

Securus Technologies, Inc. is one of the largest suppliers of inmate communications and information management solutions, serving approximately 2,600 correctional facilities nationwide as of June 30, 2008.

Syscon Holdings, Ltd., our wholly-owned subsidiary, is a leader in innovative Offender and Case Management Software design and delivery, and its systems have been implemented in many states and large counties across North America, in Australia and in the United Kingdom.

Our core business consists of installing, operating, servicing and maintaining sophisticated call processing systems in correctional facilities and providing related services. We enter into multi-year agreements (generally three to five years) directly with the correctional facilities in which we serve as the exclusive provider of telecommunications services to inmates. In exchange for the exclusive service rights, we pay a negotiated commission to the correctional facility based upon revenues generated by actual inmate telephone use. In addition, we partner with other telecommunications companies to provide our equipment and, as needed, back office support, including validation, billing and collections services, and charge a fee for such services. Based on the particular needs of the corrections industry and the requirements of the individual correctional facility, we also sell platforms and specialized equipment and services such as law enforcement management systems, call activity reporting and call blocking.

We also provide a sophisticated and comprehensive software system for correctional facilities and law enforcement agencies for complete offender management. Our system provides correctional facilities with the ability to manage and monitor inmate parole and probation activity and development at a sophisticated level.

We derived approximately 88% and 86% of our revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2008, respectively, from our direct operation of inmate telecommunication systems and the provision of related services located in correctional facilities within 47 states and the District of Columbia. We enter into multi-year agreements under direct or “prime” contracts with the correctional facilities, pursuant to which we serve as the exclusive provider of telecommunications services to inmates within each facility. In exchange for the exclusive service rights, we pay a commission to the correctional facility based upon inmate telephone use. Our commission rates averaged approximately 45% and 44% for the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2008, respectively. We install and generally retain ownership of the telephones and the associated equipment and provide additional services tailored to the specialized needs of the corrections industry and to the requirements of each individual correctional facility, such as call activity recording and call blocking. In our direct call provisioning business, we earn the full retail value of the call and pay corresponding line charges and commissions. As a result, our direct call provisioning business gross profit dollars are higher, but our gross profit margin is lower, than in our services business.

We also offer our solutions services and the sale of equipment to RBOCs, LECs, IXCs and independent telecommunications companies as customers, to support their telecommunication contracts with correctional facilities. We derived approximately 10% and 7% of our revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2008, respectively, from our solutions business. The solutions business consists of providing validation, uncollectible account management and billing services. In this business, accounts receivable generated from calls placed by inmates in correctional facilities are typically purchased from the third party inmate telecommunication providers and we accept responsibility for call validation, uncollectible accounts, and billing and collections costs, with no recourse to the RBOC, LEC, IXC or independent customer. However, all purchased receivables must be processed and validated through our risk management system prior to allowing the call to be completed and also must be billed through our proprietary billing systems. Revenues from our solutions services equal the difference between the face

value of the receivables purchased and the amount we pay the RBOC, LEC, IXC or independent customers for the discounted accounts receivable. Because revenues associated with our solutions business represent only a percentage of the face value of the receivables purchased, the associated billing and collection fees and uncollectible account expense represent a much higher percentage of revenues as compared to our direct call provisioning business. In the solutions business, we do not bear any of the costs of facility commissions, equipment, line charges or direct sales charges, but bear the risk of unbillable and uncollectible accounts receivable.

In our direct call provisioning business and solutions services, we accumulate call activity data from our various installations and bill our revenues related to this call activity primarily through direct billing agreements with LEC billing agents, or in some cases through billing aggregators. We also receive payment on a prepaid basis for a significant portion of our services and record deferred revenue until the prepaid balances are used. In each case, we recognize revenue when the calls are completed and accrue the related telecommunication costs for validating, transmitting, billing and collection, bad debt, and line and long-distance charges, along with commissions payable to the facilities. In our telecommunications services business, our service partner bills the called party and we either share the revenues with our service partner or receive a prescribed fee for each call completed. We also charge fees for additional services such as customer support and advanced validation.

We derived approximately 6% of our revenues from our offender management software business for the six months ended June 30, 2008. Offender management systems are platforms that allow facilities managers and law enforcement personnel to analyze data to reduce costs, prevent and solve crimes and facilitate rehabilitation through a single user interface. Revenue related to the Offender Management software is recognized under Statement of Position 97-2, Software Revenue Recognition, as amended. Revenue is recognized when the fair value of vendor specific objective evidence (“VSOE”) is determined. If the VSOE of fair value cannot be determined for any undelivered element or any undelivered element is essential to the functionality of the delivered element, revenue is deferred until such criteria are met or recognized as the last element is delivered. Under the residual method, the fair value of the undelivered elements is deferred and the difference between the total arrangement fee and the amount recorded as deferred revenue for the undelivered elements is recognized as revenue related to the delivered elements.

We derived approximately 2% and 1% of our revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2008, respectively, by providing telecommunication services to RBOCs, LECs, IXCs, and independent telecommunications companies, our service partners, typically through subcontracts in connection with the RBOCs’, LECs’ or IXCs’ separate contracts with larger correctional institutions. In such instances, we provide equipment, security enhanced call processing, call validation, and service and support through the telecommunications provider, rather than directly to the facility. Although our revenues for services to telecommunications service providers are lower than in our direct call provisioning business, where we provide the service to the facility directly and receive the retail value of the call, we do not incur all the additional capital costs related to these larger contracts that can require up-front or guaranteed commission payments. Our gross margin percentage for providing telecommunications services is higher than the margin for our direct call provisioning business because we do not incur commissions, transport costs or risk of collection.

We also sell equipment, typically consisting of our inmate calling system, to a limited number of telecommunication services providers.

Our principal cost of service for our direct call provisioning business consists of commissions paid to correctional facilities which are typically expressed as a percentage of either gross or net direct revenues and are typically fixed for the term of the agreements with the facilities; bad debt expense, consisting of unbillable and uncollectible accounts; billing charges; customer service costs; telecommunication costs such as telephone line access, long distance and other charges; field operations and maintenance costs, which consist primarily of field service on our installed base of inmate telephones; and selling, general, and administrative costs. We pay monthly line and usage charges to RBOCs and other LECs for

interconnection to the local network for local calls, which are computed on a flat monthly charge plus, for certain LECs, a per message or per minute usage rate based on the time and duration of the call. We also pay fees to RBOCs and other LECs and long distance carriers based on usage for long distance calls. Third-party billing charges consist of payments to LECs and other billing service providers for billing and collecting revenues from called parties. Customer service costs represent either in-house or contracted customer service representatives who handle questions and concerns and take payments from billed parties.

Cost of service associated with the solutions business generally includes billing and collection, call validation, and the risk of unbillable and uncollectible accounts receivable.

Cost of service associated with our offender management software business primarily includes salaries and related costs of employees and contractors who provide technological services to develop, customize or enhance the software for our clients.

Cost of service associated with telecommunication services consists primarily of service administration costs for correctional facilities, including salaries and related personnel expenses, and inmate calling systems repair and maintenance expenses. Cost of service associated with telecommunication services also

includes costs associated with call validation procedures (primarily network expenses and database access charges).

Facility Commissions. In our direct call provisioning business, we pay a facility commission typically based on a percentage of our billed revenues from such facility. Commissions are set at the beginning of each facility contract.

Bad Debt. We account for bad debt as a cost of providing telecommunications in our direct call provisioning and solutions business lines. We accrue the related telecommunications cost charges along with an allowance for unbillable and uncollectible calls, based on historical experience. Charges for inmate telephone calls on a collect basis are considered unbillable, in cases when there is no billing address for the telephone number called, or uncollectible, when the billed party is unable or unwilling to pay for the call. We use a proprietary, specialized billing and bad-debt management system to integrate our billing with our call blocking, validation, and customer inquiry procedures. We seek to manage our higher risk revenues by proactively requiring certain billed parties to prepay collect calls or be directly billed by us. This system utilizes multi-variable algorithms to minimize bad debt expense by adjusting our credit policies and billing. For example, when unemployment rates are high, we may decrease credit to less creditworthy-billed parties or require them to purchase prepaid calling time in order to receive inmate calls. Bad debt tends to rise as the economy worsens, and is subject to numerous factors, some of which may not be known. To the extent our bad debt management system overcompensates for bad debt exposure by limiting credit to billed parties, our revenues and profitability may decline as fewer calls are permitted to be made. We anticipate that if the U.S. economy continues its decline, either our bad debt will rise, or revenue from marginal billed parties will decline, or a combination of both will occur. However, we have tightened our credit policy to reduce our risk of loss from bad debts.

Field Operations and Maintenance Costs. Field operations and maintenance costs consist of service administration costs for correctional facilities, including salaried and related personnel expenses, and inmate calling systems (including related equipment), repair and maintenance. The costs of providing telecommunications services primarily consist of service administration costs for correctional facilities, including salaries and related personnel expenses and inmate calling systems repair and maintenance expenses.

SG&A. SG&A expenses consist of corporate overhead and selling expenses, including marketing, accounting, legal, regulatory, and research and development costs.

We provide our products and services to telecommunications and solutions service providers such as Global Tel*Link, Embarq, AT&T, and FSH Communications. For the three and six months ended June 30,

2008, 7.6 % and 8.1%, respectively, of our total revenues were generated from contracts with telecommunications and solutions service providers. The following table lists our largest telecommunications and solutions service provider contracts for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008:

	Solutions Services				Telecommunications Services
	Three		Six		Three		Six
	Months		Months		Months		Months
	Ended		Ended		Ended		Ended		Contract
	June 30,		June 30,		June 30,		June 30,		Expiration
	2008		2008		2008		2008		Date*
Global Tel*Link	74	%	72	%	28	%	29	%	Month-to-Month
Embarq	26	%	28	%	17	%	16	%	Month-to-Month
AT&T	-	%	-	%	28	%	35	%	Month-to-Month
FSH Communications	-	%	-	%	18	%	16	%	Month-to-Month

We anticipate that our revenues and profits associated with our customer, Global Tel*Link, will continue to decline and that agreements we have in place with them will not be renewed upon expiration. Global Tel*Link has been eliminating our services and we believe it is reasonable to expect that they will continue to do so over time as underlying contracts expire. We therefore expect our solutions and telecommunications services business with Global Tel*Link to decline to zero over the next several years. Our solutions and telecommunications services customers can replace our services as their underlying phone contracts with correctional facilities expire. Similarly, AT&T has been gradually exiting the inmate telecommunications business, and we expect our related services will be steadily eliminated in the near future.

Notwithstanding the foregoing developments and the anticipated declining revenue stream associated with our solutions and telecommunication services product lines, we believe that the departure of large industry participants from the direct call provisioning business may present significant opportunities for us and other independent providers in the future. However, we anticipate that contracts to service the facilities will likely be subject to competitive bidding. Moreover, as we seek to secure inmate telecommunications contracts with larger county and state departments of corrections, we may be required to provide multi-million dollar up front payments, surety bonds or guaranteed commissions, as well as incur the cost of equipment and similar costs. We intend to partner with other independent providers on future department of correction contracts such that we will not be required to make large capital investments for these contracts.

The following table sets forth, for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2008, our results of operations (in thousands).

	For the Three Months Ended					For the Six Months Ended
	June 30,			June 30,		June 30,			June 30,
	2007			2008		2007			2008
	(Unaudited)					(Unaudited)
Revenue:
Direct call provisioning	$	87,691		$	84,727	$	178,837		$	169,625
Solutions services		9,335			6,216		19,934			13,193
Offender management software		-			7,426		-			11,615
Telecommunications services		1,999			1,373		4,365			2,796
Equipment sales and other		139			31		240			216
Total revenue	$	99,164		$	99,773	$	203,376		$	197,445
Expenses:
Cost of services	$	77,127		$	73,719	$	157,249		$	146,843
Selling, general and administrative		14,889			15,886		28,286			31,973
Restructuring costs		614			-		614			224
Depreciation and amortization		9,106			8,656		17,591			17,254
Total operating costs and expenses		101,736			98,261		203,740			196,294
Operating income (loss)	$	(2,572	)	$	1,512	$	(364	)	$	1,151

	Total Variance					Total Variance
	In Dollars					In Dollars
	Between the					Between the
	Three Months					Six Months
	Ended June 30,			%		Ended June 30,			%
	2007 and 2008			Change		2007 and 2008			Change
(Dollars in thousands)	(Unaudited)					(Unaudited)
Revenue:
Direct call provisioning	$	(2,964	)	(3.4	)%	$	(9,212	)	(5.2	)%
Solutions services		(3,119	)	(33.4	)		(6,741	)	(33.8	)
Offender management software		7,426		100.0			11,615		100.0
Telecommunications services		(626	)	(31.3	)		(1,569	)	(35.9	)
Equipment sales and other		(108	)	(77.7	)		(24	)	(10.0	)
Total revenue		609		0.6			(5,931	)	(2.9	)
Expenses:
Total cost of service		(3,408	)	(4.4	)		(10,406	)	(6.6	)
Selling, general and administrative		997		6.7			3,687		13.0
Restructuring costs		(614	)	-			(390	)	(63.5	)
Depreciation and amortization		(450	)	(4.9	)		(337	)	(1.9	)
Total operating costs and expenses		(3,475	)	(3.4	)		(7,446	)	(3.7	)
Operating income (loss)	$	4,084		158.8	%	$	1,515		416.2	%

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2008 COMPARED TO THE THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2007

The corrections industry, which includes the inmate calling and offender management software markets, is and can be expected to remain highly competitive. We compete directly with numerous other suppliers of inmate call processing systems and other corrections-related products (including our own telecommunications and solutions service provider customers) that market their products to our same customer base.

Revenues. Compared to the second quarter of the prior year, consolidated revenues increased $0.6 million, or 0.6%, to $99.8 million due primarily to the addition of the offender management software segment, which became part of our consolidated results of operations after our acquisition of Syscon on June 29, 2007. The primary components of the change in revenues are discussed below:

Direct call provisioning revenues decreased $3.0 million, or 3.4%, to $84.7 million primarily due to:

Solutions services revenues decreased by $3.1 million, or 33.4%, to $6.2 million. Solutions services revenues declined primarily due to terminations of service by Global Tel*Link as its underlying facility contracts expired. Because we believe Global Tel*Link will continue to eliminate our services as contracts expire, we expect solutions services revenues to decline the remainder of 2008.

Offender management software revenues of $7.4 million are part of our consolidated results of operations as a result of the acquisition of Syscon on June 29, 2007. As required by Financial Accounting Standards Board Statement No. 141, Emerging Issues Task Force Issue No. 01-3, and related rules, Syscon’s balance sheet reflects fair values of assets and liabilities on the acquisition date. Consequently, we valued Syscon’s customer contracts and related deferred revenues, which will impact the amount of revenue and profit that we will be able to recognize prospectively. As a result, during the three months ended June 30, 2008, for our offender management segment, our revenues and operating profit were $1.0 million lower than would have been reported had no acquisition occurred, representing the current period amortization of contracts acquired. The majority of our offender management revenues are currently associated with our ongoing implementation of our software for Her Majesty’s Prison Service in the United Kingdom, through a sub-contracting agreement with Electronic Data Systems, Inc. We expect to continue to have consistent revenues from this contract through the first quarter of 2009.

Telecommunications services revenues decreased by $0.6 million, or 31.3 %, to $1.4 million primarily attributable to accounts that we did not retain upon contract renewal or accounts that converted to direct provisioning revenue. We have not retained a significant amount of our telecommunications services contracts upon renewal because of our focus to grow our direct provisioning business. The departure of some of our large customers from the inmate telecommunications market and resulting sale of those businesses to our competitors contributed to the decline. We expect the significant decline in telecommunication services revenue to continue, although at a more gradual rate, through 2008.

Equipment sales and other services revenues represented a minor component of our total revenues.

Cost of Service. Compared to the second quarter of the prior year, cost of service decreased $3.4 million, or 4.4%, to $73.7 million. The decrease was due primarily to favorable margin performance in our direct call provisioning segment, offset by the expenses related to the offender management software

segment acquired in June 2007. A comparison of the components of our business segment gross margins is provided below:

	For The Three Months				For The Three Months
	Ended June 30,				Ended June 30,
(Dollars in thousands)	2007				2008
	(Unaudited)				(Unaudited)
Direct call provisioning
Revenue	$	87,691			$	84,727
Cost of service		69,931	79.7	%		64,834	76.5	%
Segment gross margin	$	17,760	20.3	%	$	19,893	23.5	%
Solutions services
Revenue	$	9,335			$	6,216
Cost of service		6,222	66.7	%		4,006	64.4	%
Segment gross margin	$	3,113	33.3	%	$	2,210	35.6	%
Offender management software
Revenue	$	-			$	7,426
Cost of service		-				4,014	54.1	%
Segment gross margin	$	-			$	3,412	45.9	%
Telecommunications services
Revenue	$	1,999			$	1,373
Cost of service		885	44.3	%		846	61.6	%
Segment gross margin	$	1,114	55.7	%	$	527	38.4	%
Equipment sales and other
Revenue	$	139			$	31
Cost of service		89	64.0	%		19	61.3	%
Segment gross margin	$	50	36.0	%	$	12	38.7	%

Cost of service in our direct provisioning business as a percentage of revenue decreased to 76.5% from 79.7% primarily due to lower bad debt expense. Bad debt expense has declined in 2008 as a result of our shift to selling products on our prepaid platforms, instituting tighter credit policies and other strategic initiatives implemented to reduce our bad debt exposure. Additionally, the second quarter of 2007 was negatively impacted by approximately $1.0 million of bad debt associated with issues arising from the migration to a new billing platform. We expect to generate further benefit in the second half of 2008 through operating efficiencies gained from our packet-based architecture, network optimization and other initiatives that we believe will reduce our cost structure over the long term. With the continuing economic downturn, however, we cannot assure you that we will be able to maintain or improve our collection rates.

Cost of service in our solutions segment as a percentage of our revenue decreased to 64.4% from 66.7% as a result of our bad debt savings initiatives. Cost of service is a more volatile component of solutions services relative to our other business units because most of the cost is comprised of bad debt expense.

Cost of service in our offender management software segment as a percentage of revenue is 54.1% and primarily represents salaries and related costs of employees and contractors, who provide technological services to develop, customize or enhance the software for our clients.

Cost of service in our telecommunications segment as a percentage of revenue increased to 61.6% from 44.3% due to a shift in profitability of the remaining accounts in service and the relative profitability of those accounts de-installed over the last year.

Cost of service in our equipment sales and other segment decreased as a percentage of revenue to 61.3% from 64.0%, which is reflective of the gross margin receive on sales during those quarters.

SG&A. SG&A expenses of $15.9 million were $1.0 million, or 6.7%, higher than the prior year quarter. The increase in expense was due primarily to the addition of Syscon, offset by lower personnel

costs mainly due to several one-time adjustments of approximately $1.0 million that negatively impacted the second quarter of 2007.

Depreciation and Amortization Expenses. Depreciation and amortization expenses of $8.7 million were $0.5 million, or 4.9%, lower than the prior year quarter. Amortization is lower in 2008 as a result of intangibles related to the Evercom acquisition that became fully amortized in 2007. Depreciation and amortization for the second quarter 2008 includes $1.0 million related to Syscon operations associated primarily with the write-up of Syscon’s assets to fair market value as of the acquisition date.

Patent Litigation Settlement, Net of Expenses. In May 2008, we settled a patent infringement lawsuit in the amount of $0.1 million, net of expenses.

Interest and Other Expenses, net. Interest and other expenses were $7.6 million and $9.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2007 and 2008, respectively. The increase relates primarily to the increasing principal on the Senior Subordinated notes due to interest being paid-in-kind and interest expense on the $40 million 11% Second-priority Senior Secured Notes due 2011 issued on June 29, 2007.

Income Tax Expense. Income tax expense for the three months ended June 30, 2007 was $0.5 million compared to $0.8 million for the three months ended June 30, 2008. The Company generates tax expense principally due to changes in its deferred tax balances and amounts due to the state taxing jurisdictions.

Revenues. The Company’s revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2008 decreased $5.9 million, or 2.9%, to $197.4 million. This decrease was due primarily to decline in the Company’s direct call provisioning and solutions services segments, offset by the addition of offender management software revenues. The primary components of the decrease in revenues are discussed below:

Direct call provisioning revenues decreased $9.2 million, or 5.2%, to $169.6 million primarily due to:

Solutions services revenues decreased by $6.7 million, or 33.8%, to $13.2 million primarily due to terminations of service by Global Tel*Link as their underlying facility contracts expired. Because we believe Global Tel*Link will continue to eliminate our services as contracts expire, we expect solutions services revenues to decline by up to $1.0 million for the remainder of 2008.

Offender management software revenues of $11.6 million are part of our consolidated results of operations as a result of the acquisition of Syscon on June 29, 2007. As required by Financial Accounting Standards Board Statement No. 141, Emerging Issues Task Force Issue No. 01-3, and related rules,

Syscon’s balance sheet reflects fair values of assets and liabilities on the acquisition date. Consequently, we valued Syscon’s customer contracts and related deferred revenues, which will impact the amount of revenue and profit that we will be able to recognize prospectively. As a result, during the six months ended June 30, 2008, for our offender management segment, our revenues and operating profit were $1.8 million lower than would have been reported had no acquisition occurred, representing the current period amortization of contracts acquired. The majority of our offender management revenues are currently associated with our ongoing implementation of our software for Her Majesty’s Prison Service in the United Kingdom, through a sub-contracting agreement with Electronic Data Systems, Inc. We expect to continue to have consistent revenues from this contract through the first quarter of 2009.

Telecommunications services revenues decreased by $1.6 million, or 35.9%, to $2.8 million primarily attributable to accounts that we did not retain upon contract renewal or accounts that converted to direct provisioning revenue. We have not retained a significant amount of our telecommunications services contracts upon renewal as a result of our strategy to focus on growing our direct provisioning business. The departure of some of our large customers from the inmate telecommunications market and resulting sale of those businesses to our competitors contributed to the decline. We expect the significant decline in telecommunication services revenue to continue through 2008, although at a more gradual rate.

Equipment sales and other services revenues remained relatively flat. We do not expect to generate significant equipment sales revenue in the future.

Cost of Service. Total cost of service decreased by $10.4 million, or 6.6%, to $146.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008. The decrease was due primarily to the decrease in revenues and lower bad debt expenses, partially offset by the expenses related to the offender management software business we acquired last year. A comparison of the components of our gross margins is provided below.

	For The Six Months				For The Six Months
	Ended June 30,				Ended June 30,
(Dollars in thousands)	2007				2008
	(Unaudited)				(Unaudited)
Direct call provisioning
Revenue	$	178,837			$	169,625
Cost of service		141,510	79.1	%		130,021	76.7	%
Segment gross margin	$	37,327	20.9	%	$	39,604	23.3	%
Solutions services
Revenue	$	19,934			$	13,193
Cost of service		13,627	68.4	%		8,459	64.1	%
Segment gross margin	$	6,307	31.6	%	$	4,734	35.9	%
Offender management software
Revenue	$	-			$	11,615
Cost of service		-				6,679	57.5	%
Segment gross margin	$	-			$	4,936	42.5	%
Telecommunications services
Revenue	$	4,365			$	2,796
Cost of service		1,937	44.4	%		1,487	53.2	%
Segment gross margin	$	2,428	55.6	%	$	1,309	46.8	%
Equipment sales and other
Revenue	$	240			$	216
Cost of service		175	72.9	%		197	91.2	%
Segment gross margin	$	65	27.1	%	$	19	8.8	%

Cost of service in our direct provisioning business as a percentage of revenue decreased to 76.7% from 79.1% primarily due to lower bad debt expense. Bad debt expense for the six months ended June 30, 2008 was substantially lower as a result of a shift to our prepaid platforms, tighter credit policies and other strategic initiatives implemented during 2007 to reduce our bad debt exposure. In 2007, we incurred over $1.0 million in bad debt arising from the migration of the billing records data to a new platform, which

caused a short-term spike in our bad debt expense. We expect to generate further benefits in 2008 through operating efficiencies gained from our packet-based architecture, network optimization and other initiatives that we believe will continue to reduce our cost structure over the long term. With the continuing economic downturn, however, we cannot assure you that we will be able to maintain or improve our collection rates.

Cost of service in our solutions segment as a percentage of our revenue decreased to 64.1% from 68.4% as a result our bad debt savings initiatives. Cost of service is a more volatile component of solutions services relative to our other business units because most of the cost is comprised of bad debt expense.

Cost of service in our offender management software segment as a percentage of revenue is 57.5% and primarily represents salaries and related costs of employees and contractors, who provide technological services to develop, customize or enhance the software for our clients.

Cost of service in our telecommunications segment as a percentage of revenue increased to 53.2% from 44.4%. This increase is due to a shift in profitability of the remaining accounts in service and the relative profitability of those accounts de-installed over the last year.

Cost of service in our equipment sales and other segment increased as a percentage of revenue to 91.2% from 72.9%. We believe future cost of service as a percentage of revenue in this segment will be more consistent with long-term historical trends.

SG&A. SG&A expenses of $32.0 million were $3.7 million, or 13.0%, higher than the prior year primarily due to the addition of Syscon and $0.8 million in higher legal costs in 2008. These increases were partially offset by lower personnel cost mainly due to several one-time adjustments of approximately $1.0 million that negatively impacted the six months ended June 30, 2007. We expect legal expenses to decline over the remainder of 2008 due to the settlement of several intellectual property lawsuits and other litigation.

Restructuring Costs. During the first quarter of 2008, we incurred $0.2 million related to the realignment of our field service organization because of efficiencies gained from our packet-based architecture, which we began to install in 2006 and will continue to install as customer contracts are renewed. In 2007, restructuring charges of $0.6 million were incurred related to the consolidation of our customer care function into the Dallas office.

Depreciation and Amortization Expenses. Depreciation and amortization expenses of $17.3 million were $0.3 million, or 1.9%, lower than the prior year six month period. The decrease is primarily attributable to lower amortization of intangibles related to the Evercom acquisition that became fully amortized in 2007, partially offset by an increase in amortization on new software development and purchases. Depreciation and amortization in 2008 includes $1.9 million related to Syscon operations associated primarily with the write-up of Syscon’s assets to fair market value as of the acquisition date.

Patent Litigation Settlement, Net of Expenses. In May 2008, we settled a patent infringement lawsuit in the amount of $0.1 million, net of expenses.

Interest and Other Expenses, net. Interest and other expenses were $14.8 million and $19.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2008, respectively. The increase relates primarily to the increasing principal on the Senior Subordinated notes due to interest being paid-in-kind and interest expense on the $40 million 11% Second-priority Senior Secured Notes due 2011 issued on June 29, 2007. Additionally, we experienced a foreign exchange transaction loss of $1.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008.

Income Tax Expense. Income tax expense for the six months ended June 30, 2007 was $0.9 million compared to $0.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008. The Company generated tax expense due principally to changes in its deferred tax balances and amounts due to the state taxing jurisdictions.

The Company’s principal liquidity requirements are to service and repay our debt and meet our capital expenditure and operating needs. We are significantly leveraged. As of June 30, 2008, we had $279.8 million in total debt outstanding before considering $2.8 million of original issue discount on our Second-Priority Senior Secured Notes and $2.3 million of fair value attributable to warrants issued in connection with our Senior Subordinated debt financing, both of which are reflected as discounts to outstanding long-term debt in our condensed consolidated financial statements (see additional information on our long and short term debt under "Debt and Other Obligations" below). As of June 30, 2008, we had unused capacity of $11.5 million under our working capital facility and a total stockholders’ deficit of $108.8 million. As of August 12, 2008, we had unused capacity of $18.4 million under our working capital facility.

The indenture for our Second-priority Senior Secured Notes requires us to maintain a Credit Facility Coverage Ratio above 1.75. This financial covenant is calculated by dividing Credit Facility Cash Flow by Credit Facility Interest Expense (each as defined in the indenture) and is calculated on a pro forma basis for the impact of acquisitions, such as our acquisition of Syscon in June 2007. The indenture provides that two consecutive quarters of non-compliance with the Credit Facility Coverage Ratio will cause a default. The definition of the Credit Facility Coverage Ratio provides that the proceeds from equity we issue are added to Credit Facility Cash Flow. We issued $10.2 million of Series A Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock to our stockholders in December 2007, in part to avoid a default under the indenture. There is no guarantee that the proceeds of the issuance will prevent a future default under our credit facilities. Based on our current and expected level of operations, we believe our cash flow from operations, available cash and available borrowings under our $30.0 million working capital facility will be adequate to make required capital expenditures and to service our indebtedness and meet our other working capital needs for at least twelve months from our balance sheet dated June 30, 2008.

Our cash flows from operations are primarily attributable to the operations of our direct call provisioning business, which represents approximately 86% of our revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2008. The level of our cash flows depends on multiple factors, including contract renewals and new business, as well as growth in inmate populations. Our net cash provided by operating activities is also affected by the level of our operating and other expenses.

The following table provides cash flow data for the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2008:

Net cash provided by operating activities for the six months ended June 30, 2008, consisted primarily of $18.4 million of operating income before considering non-cash expenses, such as $17.3 million of depreciation and amortization, offset by $11.0 million of cash paid for interest and $4.2 million of working capital use. Net cash provided by operating activities for the six months ended June 30, 2007, consisted primarily of $17.2 million of operating income before considering non-cash expenses such as $17.6 million of depreciation and amortization, offset by $8.8 million for cash paid for interest expense and $1.4 million of working capital use. The working capital fluctuations were due to short-term month-end timing of certain normal operating receipts and disbursements and scheduled annual prepaid commission advances to certain facilities. Additionally, the decline in our solutions and telecommunications services volumes caused us to use working capital in 2008 as a result of payments to our wholesale partners.

Cash used in investing activities was $55.2 million and $8.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2008, respectively. The $8.7 million represents capital expenditures of equipment and intangibles to maintain and grow the direct call provisioning business. In June 2007, we utilized $43.7 million related to the acquisition of Syscon and $11.6 million was invested in equipment and intangible assets to grow the direct call business. The decline in spending from 2007 was principally due to savings associated with the deployment of our packet-based architecture to new or renewal business in 2008.

Cash provided by financing activities was $52.5 million and $7.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2008, respectively. The $7.2 million primarily relates to $4.9 million in net draws on the Company's revolving credit facility for short term operational needs and a benefit from a timing difference in outstanding checks. The decline in financing activities from 2007 is due to the issuance of an additional $40.0 million of notes in 2007 to fund the Syscon acquisition. As of August 12, 2008, there was $3.0 million of borrowings under the revolving credit facility.

Our ability to make payments on and to refinance our indebtedness, and to fund planned capital expenditures will depend on our ability to generate cash in the future, which, to a certain extent, is subject to general economic, financial, competitive, legislative, regulatory and other factors that are beyond our control. Based on our current and expected level of operations, we believe our cash flow from operations, available cash and available borrowings under our $30.0 million working capital facility will be adequate to make required capital expenditures and to service our indebtedness and meet our other working capital needs for at least twelve months from our balance sheet dated June 30, 2008. We cannot assure you, however, that our available sources of cash will be sufficient to enable us to make such capital expenditures, service our indebtedness or to fund our other working capital needs. Further, in the event we wish to make additional acquisitions, we may need to seek additional financing.

Revolving Credit Facility — We have a revolving credit facility with a syndicate of banks and other lending institutions with a borrowing base limitation equal to 80% of “eligible” receivables and 50% of “eligible” inventory, as defined in the credit agreement. The revolving credit facility provides for financing on a revolving basis of up to $30.0 million and a $22.5 million letter of credit facility that expires on September 9, 2009. Letters of credit outstanding reduce our availability to the extent they exceed $10.0 million and the borrowing base collateral falls below $40 million. The borrowing base collateral is principally comprised of receivables and inventory less defined reserves. Subject to certain adjustments, our maximum permitted annual capital expenditures are $22.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2008. Amounts unused under the revolving credit facility are subject to a fee, due quarterly, based on a per annum rate of 0.375%. Advances bear simple interest at an annual rate at an option equal to one of the following, (i) the Prime Rate or (ii) a rate equal to the Eurodollar Rate as adjusted by the Eurodollar Reserve Percentage plus 2.0%. Interest is payable following the end of each calendar quarter. Advances received on the revolving credit facility bore interest at our option using the prime rate, which was 7.25% and 5.00% at December 31, 2007 and June 30, 2008, respectively, or the Eurodollar Rate, which was 6.97% as of December 31, 2007 and 4.48% as of June 30, 2008. We draw from the available credit on the Revolver to cover normal business cash requirements. As of December 31, 2007 and June 30, 2008, we had $19.5 million and $11.5 million, respectively, of borrowing availability under the Revolver.

Second-priority Senior Secured Notes — We have $194.0 million of 11% Second-priority Senior Secured Notes outstanding, $154.0 million of which were issued on September 9, 2004 at a discount of $3.6 million, or 97.651%, and $40.0 million of which were issued on June 29, 2007 at a discount of $0.9 million, or 97.651% of face value. The 2007 notes were issued to finance the Syscon acquisition.

All $194.0 million of principal is due September 9, 2011. To the extent we generate excess cash flow (as defined in the indenture) in any calendar year, we are required by the Second-priority Senior Secured Notes to offer to repay principal equal to 75% of such excess cash flow at a rate of 104% of face value. No excess cash flow payment was due for the year ended December 31, 2007 because no excess cash flow was generated. Interest is payable semiannually on March 1 and September 1. The effective interest rate is 11.5% on the Second-priority Senior Secured Notes.

Senior Subordinated Notes — We have $75.9 million of Senior Subordinated Notes outstanding. They are unsecured and subordinate to the revolving credit facility, and bear interest at an annual rate of 17%. Interest is payable at the end of each calendar quarter, or, as restricted by our working capital facility, is paid-in-kind by adding accrued interest to the principal balance of the Senior Subordinated notes. All outstanding principal, including interest paid-in-kind, is due on September 9, 2014. A mandatory prepayment equal to $20.0 million plus 50% of all outstanding interest paid-in-kind is due on September 9, 2013. In connection with the issuance of the Senior Subordinated Notes, we issued warrants to acquire 51 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $10 per share to the Senior Subordinated Note holders. As a result, we discounted the face value of the Senior Subordinated Notes by $2.9 million, representing the estimated fair value of the warrants at the time of issuance. During the six months ended June 30, 2008, $6.1 million of paid-in-kind interest was added to the principal balance of the Senior Subordinated Notes. The effective interest rate is 18.54% on the Senior Subordinated Notes. In order to enter into additional financing to complete the Syscon acquisition in 2007, we incurred a non-cash consent fee of $0.4 million payable to the Senior Subordinated Noteholders. This fee was added to the principal balance of the Senior Subordinated Notes.

All of our domestic subsidiaries and certain of our foreign subsidiaries (the “Subsidiary Guarantors”) are jointly and severably liable for the working capital facility, Senior Subordinated Notes and Second-priority Senior Secured Notes. The Subsidiary Guarantors are wholly-owned. We have not included separate financial statements of their subsidiaries because of their (a) aggregate assets, liabilities, earnings and equity are presented on a consolidated basis and (b) we believe that separate financial statements and other disclosures concerning subsidiaries are not material to investors.

Our credit facilities contain financial and operating covenants, among other items, that require the maintenance of certain financial ratios, including specified interest coverage ratios, maintenance of minimum levels of operating cash flows (as defined therein), and maximum capital expenditure limitations. These covenants also limit our ability to incur additional indebtedness, make certain payments including dividends to shareholders, invest and divest company assets, and sell or otherwise dispose of capital stock. In the event that we fail to comply with the covenants and restrictions, as specified in the credit agreements, it may be in default, at which time payment of the long term debt and unpaid interest may be accelerated and become immediately due and payable. As of June 30, 2008, we were in compliance with all covenants.

Other Long-Term Liabilities. Other long-term liabilities include approximately $1.2 million of tenant improvement concessions pertaining to the lease of our primary facility that will be amortized over the life of the lease as prescribed by SFAS No. 13 and FASB Technical Bulletin 88-1. The Company recorded amortization totaling $90,000 for these improvement concessions during the six months ended June 30, 2008.

As of June 30, 2008, our contractual cash obligations and commitments on an aggregate basis were as follows:

	For the Twelve Months Ended June 30,
		2009			2010		2011		2012		2013		Thereafter
Long-term debt (1)	$	-	*	$	9,893	$	-	$	194,000	$	-	$	75,897
Unrecognized tax benefits		-			-		-		-		-		976
Minimum purchase guarantees		1,860			1,860		1,085		-		-		-
Operating leases		2,714			2,448		2,012		1,510		1,355		2,433
Total contractual cash obligations and commitments	$	4,574		$	14,201	$	3,097	$	195,510	$	1,355	$	79,306

A “critical accounting policy” is one that is both important to the portrayal of a company’s financial condition and results and requires management’s most difficult, subjective or complex judgments, often as a result of the need to make estimates about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain. The condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States, or GAAP. The process of preparing the condensed consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires us to use estimates and assumptions to determine certain of our assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses. We base these determinations upon the best information available to us during the period in which we are accounting for our results. Our estimates and assumptions could change materially as conditions within and beyond our control change or as further information becomes available. Further, these estimates and assumptions are affected by management’s application of accounting policies. Changes in our estimates are recorded in the period the change occurs. Our critical accounting policies include, among others:

The following is a discussion of our critical accounting policies and the related management estimates and assumptions necessary for determining the value of related assets or liabilities.

Revenues from direct call provisioning are recognized at the time the telephone call is completed and revenues from telecommunications and solutions services are recognized in the period in which calls are processed through our systems. Revenues from equipment sales are recognized when the equipment is shipped to customers. We record deferred revenues for advance billings to customers, or prepayments by customers.

In evaluating the collectibility of our trade receivables, we assess a number of factors including our historical cash resources held by our LEC billing agents and collection rates with our billing agents and a specific customer’s ability to meet the financial obligations to us, as well as general factors, such as the length of time the receivables are past due and historical collection experience. Based on these assessments,

we record reserves for uncollectibles to reduce the related receivables to the amount we ultimately expect to collect from our customers. If circumstances related to specific customers change or economic conditions worsen such that our past collection experience is no longer relevant, our estimate of the recoverability of our trade receivables could be further reduced or increased from the levels provided for in our financial statements. Because the majority of our receivables are collected through our LEC billing agents and such agents typically do not provide us with visibility as to collection results for on average a six to nine month period, our bad debt reserves are estimated and may be subject to substantial variation.

Our offender management segment is comprised of revenues from licenses of software and related services, which include assistance in implementation, integration, customization, maintenance, training and consulting. Revenue is recognized for software and related services in accordance with Statement of Position (SOP) 81-1, Accounting for Certain Construction Type and Certain Production Type Contracts, SOP 97-2, Software Revenue Recognition, as modified by SOP 98-9, Modification of SOP 97-2, Software Revenue Recognition with Respect to Certain Transactions, and SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) 104, Revenue Recognition.

The calculation of amortization expense is based on the cost and estimated economic useful lives of the underlying intangible assets, intellectual property assets and capitalized computer software, and patent license rights. Goodwill represents the excess of costs over fair value of assets of businesses acquired. Goodwill and intangible assets acquired in a purchase business combination and determined to have an indefinite useful life are not amortized, but instead tested for impairment at least annually in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. Intangible assets with estimable useful lives are amortized over their respective estimated useful lives to their estimated residual values, and reviewed for impairment in accordance with SFAS No. 144, Accounting for Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets. We review our unamortized intangible assets whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable or the estimated useful life has been reduced. We estimate the future cash flows expected to result from operations, and if the sum of the expected undiscounted future cash flows is less than the carrying amount of the intangible asset, we recognize an impairment loss by reducing the unamortized cost of the long-lived asset to its estimated fair value.

The Company accounts for income taxes under the provisions of SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes. Under SFAS No. 109, deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of transactions and events are determined based on the difference between the financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse. If necessary, deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance to an amount that is determined to be more likely than not recoverable. We must make significant estimates and assumptions about future taxable income and future tax consequences when determining the amount of the valuation allowance.

Accounting for the acquisition of a business as a purchase transaction requires an allocation of the purchase price to the assets acquired and the liabilities assumed in the transaction at their respective estimated fair values. The most difficult estimations of individual fair values are those involving long-lived assets, such as properties, plant and equipment and intangible assets. We use all available information to make these fair value determinations and, for major business acquisitions, engage an independent valuation specialist to assist in the fair value determination of the acquired long-lived assets. Due to inherent subjectivity in determining the estimated fair value of long-lived assets and the significant number of business acquisitions that we have completed, we believe that the recording of acquired assets and liabilities is a critical accounting policy.

In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities — Including an amendment of FASB Statement No. 115 (“SFAS No. 159”), which permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value. The objective of SFAS No. 159 is to improve financial reporting by providing entities with the opportunity to mitigate volatility in reported earnings caused by measuring related assets and liabilities differently without having to apply complex hedge accounting provisions. The Company has elected not to adopt the SFAS No. 159 fair value measurement option nor would the adoption of this Statement have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141R, Business Combinations (“SFAS No. 141R”), which requires the acquiring entity in a business combination to recognize the full fair value of the assets acquired, liabilities assumed and any noncontrolling interest as of the acquisition date; the immediate expense recognition of transaction costs; and accounting for restructuring plans separately from the business combination. This Statement applies prospectively to business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2008. Early adoption of SFAS No. 141R is prohibited. Acquisitions accounted for as a business combination that are completed subsequent to January 1, 2009 and thereafter will be impacted by this new standard.

We are exposed to market rate risk for changes in interest rates related to our revolving line of credit. Interest expense on our floating rate debt will increase more than expected if interest rates rise. Our $30.0 million revolving line of credit bears an interest rate equal to one of the following, at our option: (i) the Prime Rate or (ii) a rate equal to the Eurodollar Rate as adjusted by the Eurodollar Reserve Percentage plus

2% and is calculated on amounts borrowed under the facility. The effect of a 10% fluctuation in the interest rate on our revolving line of credit would have had a negligible impact on our interest expense for the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2008.

We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports that we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange

Commission’s (“SEC”) rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

As of the end of the period covered by this report, we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our Disclosure Committee and management, including the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(b). Based upon this evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by this report.

No change in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) occurred during the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2008 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

From time to time we have been, and expect to continue to be, subject to various legal and administrative proceedings or various claims in the normal course of its business. We believe the ultimate disposition of these matters will not have a material affect on our financial condition, liquidity, or results of operations.

defendants including us. In TIPS, we, along with other inmate telecommunications providers, were alleged to have infringed on patents concerning “cord-free” or “hands-free” inmate phone technology. This lawsuit against us was dismissed on March 1, 2007, when our motion for summary judgment was granted on the issue of non-infringement. TIPS appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals and oral arguments before the Appellate Court occurred on April 9, 2008. On June 18, 2008, the appellate court affirmed the summary judgment. Until the expiration of the time period during which TIPS may appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court, this matter remains pending. We cannot estimate the company's potential exposure or predict the likelihood of any outcomes at this time. Additionally, the TIPS entities have filed a lawsuit in the Southern District of Texas against us which alleges substantially similar allegations concerning patent infringement claims for “cord-free” or “hands-free” inmate phone technology. This lawsuit against us was similarly dismissed on January 10, 2008, when our motion for summary judgment was granted on the issues of non-infringement and a finding that Securus was not a proper defendant in the lawsuit. Although TIPS attempted to appeal this Order to the U.S. Court of Appeals, the attempt was premature due to issues that remain pending in the district court case. On June 24, 2008, the trial court entered a final judgment dismissing all claims against the Company. We believe the time period during which TIPS may appeal this final judgment has expired.

and telecommunications industry by each such defendant. In November, 2007, Inmate Calling Solutions, Inc. entered into a Settlement Agreement and Mutual Release, and a Patent License Agreement with us, and was dismissed from the suit. In May, 2008, AGM Telecom Corporation entered into a Settlement Agreement with us, and was dismissed with prejudice from the suit. On August 1, 2008, Global Tel*Link Corporation entered into a Settlement Agreement and Mutual Release and a Patent License, Covenant not to Sue and Non-Assertion Agreement with us. The parties are in the process of filing the appropriate documentation with the Court to dismiss the suit against Global Tel*Link Corporation with prejudice.

In July 2007, Global Tel*Link Corporation filed suit in the Circuit Court of Montgomery County against T-Netix Inc., the State of Alabama, and the Alabama Department of Finance and Alabama Department of Corrections. This proceeding relates to the protest matter Global Tel* Link filed in Alabama in May 2007, which was concluded in April 2008. We filed a Motion to Dismiss which was denied; however, GTL conceded that several of its claims were not viable, and in its amended complaint included only one count, the intentional interference with business and contractual relations claim. Both parties agreed that the appeal of the Alabama Protest Matter could be dispositive, or at least highly persuasive, of the outcome of this second lawsuit; therefore, the Judge agreed to postpone setting any scheduling deadlines and recently postponed the trial date of August 4, 2008. The Judge also ordered the parties to mediate the case, but did not specify a deadline. There has not been any litigation activity in this case since the ruling in the companion matter on April 11, 2008. T-Netix has not admitted any wrongdoing and has vigorously denied each and every allegation in the case. No prediction of the likelihood of any outcome or reasonable estimate of range of potential loss can be made at this time.

You should carefully consider those risk factors discussed in Forward-Looking Statements set forth previously in this document, as well as the other factors detailed from time to time in our filings with the SEC. These risks are not the only risks facing us. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or those we currently view to be immaterial may also materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, or results of operations.

In June 2008, 57,072.61 shares of Class B Common Stock were issued in connection with the appointment of our new Chief Executive Officer and 11,414.52 shares of Class B Common Stock were issued to our new Chief Financial Officer.

The Sale of the Class B Common Stock was made pursuant to the exemption set forth in Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933.

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

2.1	Stock Purchase Agreement, dated April 11, 2007, by and among Securus Technologies, Inc., Appaloosa Acquisition Company, 0787223 B.C. Ltd, and 0787223 B.C. Ltd’s sole stockholder, incorporated by reference from form 8-K filed April 16, 2007.

3.1	Second Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Securus Technologies, Inc., incorporated by reference from Form 8-K filed January 3, 2008.

3.1.1	Certificate of Designation, Preferences, and Rights of Series A Preferred Stock of Securus Technologies, Inc., incorporated by reference from Form 8-K filed January 3, 2008.

3.2	Amended and Restated Bylaws of Securus Technologies, Inc., incorporated by reference from Form S-4 filed May 16, 2005.

3.3	Certificate of Incorporation of T-Netix, Inc., filed on September 7, 2001, as amended, incorporated by reference from Form S-4 filed May 16, 2005.

3.4	Bylaws of T-Netix, Inc, incorporated by reference from Form S-4 filed May 16, 2005.

3.5	Articles of Incorporation of Telequip Labs, Inc., filed on November 9, 1987, as amended, incorporated by reference from Form S-4 filed May 16, 2005.

3.6	Amended and Restated Bylaws of Telequip Labs, Inc., incorporated by reference from Form S-4 filed May 16, 2005.

3.7	Articles of Incorporation of T-NETIX Telecommunications Services, Inc., filed on February 11, 1988, as amended, incorporated by reference from Form S-4 filed May 16, 2005.

3.8	Bylaws of T-NETIX Telecommunications Services, Inc., incorporated by reference from Form S-4 filed May 16, 2005.

3.9	Certificate of Incorporation of Evercom Holdings, Inc., filed on November 25, 2002, as amended, incorporated by reference from Form S-4 filed May 16, 2005.

3.10	Bylaws of Evercom Holdings, Inc., incorporated by reference from Form S-4 filed May 16, 2005.

3.11	Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Evercom, Inc., filed on February 19, 2003, incorporated by reference from Form S-4 filed May 16, 2005.

3.12	Bylaws of Evercom, Inc., incorporated by reference from Form S-4 filed May 16, 2005.

3.13	Certificate of Incorporation of Evercom Systems, Inc., filed on August 22, 1997, as amended, incorporated by reference from Form S-4 filed May 16, 2005.

3.14	Bylaws of Evercom Systems, Inc., incorporated by reference from Form S-4 filed May 16, 2005.

3.15	Certificate of Incorporation Syscon of Justice Systems Canada Ltd., incorporated by reference from Form S-4 filed August 1, 2007.

3.16	Articles of Syscon of Justice Systems Canada Ltd., incorporated by reference from Form S-4 filed August 1, 2007.

3.17	Articles of Incorporation of Syscon Justice Systems, Inc., incorporated by reference from Form S-4 filed August 1, 2007.

3.18	Bylaws of Syscon Justice Systems, Inc., incorporated by reference from Form S-4 filed August 1, 2007.

3.19	Articles of Organization of Modeling Solutions LLC incorporated by reference from Form S-4 filed August 1, 2007.

3.20	Operating Agreement of Modeling Solutions LLC incorporated by reference from Form S-4 filed August 1, 2007.

3.21	Articles of Organization of Modeling Solutions, LLC incorporated by reference from Form S-4 filed August 1, 2007

3.22	Operating Agreement of Modeling Solutions, LLC incorporated by reference from Form S-4 filed August 1, 2007.

4.1	Form of 11% Second-priority Senior Secured Notes due 2011, incorporated by reference from Form S-4 filed May 16, 2005.

4.2	Indenture, dated as of September 9, 2004, by and among Securus, T-Netix, Inc., a Delaware corporation, T-NETIX Telecommunications Services, Inc., a Texas corporation, T-Netix Monitoring Corporation, a Colorado corporation, SpeakEZ, Inc., a Colorado corporation, Telequip Labs, Inc., a Nevada corporation, Evercom Holdings, Inc., Evercom, Inc., EverConnect, Inc., a Delaware corporation, Evercom Systems, Inc., a Delaware corporation, and The Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A., incorporated by reference from Form S-4 filed May 16, 2005.

4.2.1	Supplemental Indenture, dated June 27, 2007, by and among Appaloosa Acquisition Company Ltd., a British Columbia company, T-NETIX, Inc., a Delaware corporation, T-NETIX Telecommunications Services, Inc., a Texas corporation, Telequip Labs, Inc., a Nevada corporation, Evercom Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation, Evercom, Inc., a Delaware corporation, Evercom Systems, Inc., a Delaware corporation, as guarantors, and The Bank of New York, as trustee, incorporated by reference from Form 8-K filed July 2, 2007.

4.2.2	Supplemental Indenture, dated June 29, 2007, by and among Appaloosa Acquisition Company Ltd., a British Columbia company, Syscon Justice Systems Canada Ltd., a British Columbia company, Syscon Holdings Ltd., a British Columbia corporation, Syscon Justice Systems, Inc., a California corporation, Modeling Solutions, LLC, a Wisconsin limited liability company, Modeling Solutions LLC, a Nevada limited liability company, and The Bank of New York, as trustee, incorporated by reference from Form S-4 filed August 1, 2007.

4.4	Amended and Restated Security Agreement, dated June 29, 2007, by and among Appaloosa Acquisition Company Ltd., a British Columbia company, Modeling Solutions, LLC, a Wisconsin limited liability company, Modeling Solutions LLC, a Nevada limited liability company, Syscon Justice Systems International Pty Limited, an Australia company, Syscon Justice Systems International Limited, a United Kingdom company, Syscon Justice Systems Canada Ltd., a British Columbia company, Syscon Justice Systems, Inc., a California corporation, as guarantors, and The Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A., incorporated by reference from Form S-4 filed August 1, 2007.

4.4.1	Supplement to Amended and Restated Security Agreement, dated June 29, 2007, incorporated by reference from Form S-4 filed August 1, 2007.

4.5	Amended and Restated Patent Security Agreement, dated June 29, 2007, by and among Securus Technologies, Inc., T-Netix, Inc., a Delaware corporation, T-NETIX Telecommunications Services, Inc., a Texas corporation, Telequip Labs, Inc., a Nevada corporation, Evercom Holdings, Inc., Evercom, Inc., Evercom Systems, Inc., a Delaware corporation, Modeling Solutions, LLC, a Wisconsin limited liability company, Modeling Solutions LLC, a Nevada limited liability company, Syscon Justice Systems, Inc., a California corporation, and The Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A., incorporated by reference from Form S-4 filed August 1, 2007.

4.6	Amended and Restated Copyright Security Agreement, dated June 29, 2007, by and among Securus Technologies, Inc., T-Netix, Inc., a Delaware corporation, T-NETIX Telecommunications Services, Inc., a Texas corporation, Telequip Labs, Inc., a Nevada corporation, Evercom Holdings, Inc., Evercom, Inc., Evercom Systems, Inc., a Delaware corporation, Modeling Solutions, LLC, a Wisconsin limited liability company, Modeling Solutions LLC, a Nevada limited liability company, Syscon Justice Systems, Inc., a California corporation, and The Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A., incorporated by reference from Form S-4 filed August 1, 2007.

4.7	Amended and Restated Trademark Security Agreement, dated June 29, 2007, by and among Securus Technologies, Inc., T-Netix, Inc., a Delaware corporation, T-NETIX Telecommunications Services, Inc., a Texas corporation, Telequip Labs, Inc., a Nevada corporation, Evercom Holdings, Inc., Evercom, Inc., Evercom Systems, Inc., a Delaware corporation, Modeling Solutions, LLC, a Wisconsin limited liability company, Modeling Solutions LLC, a Nevada limited liability company, Syscon Justice Systems, Inc., a California corporation, and The Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A., incorporated by reference from Form S-4 filed August 1, 2007.

4.8	Amended and Restated Pledge Agreement, dated June 29, 2007, by and among Appaloosa Acquisition Company Ltd., a British Columbia company, Syscon Justice Systems, Inc., a California corporation, and T-Netix, Inc., Evercom Holdings, Inc., Evercom, Inc., each a Delaware corporation, incorporated by reference from Form S-4 filed August 1, 2007.

4.8.1	Supplement No. 1 to Amended and Restated Pledge Agreement, dated June 29, 2007, incorporated by reference from Form S-4 filed August 1, 2007.

4.9	Credit Agreement, dated September 9, 2004, by and among Securus Technologies, Inc., as the Borrower, the Subsidiaries of the Borrower, as Guarantors, the Financial Institutions party thereto as the Lenders, and ING Capital LLC as the Issuing Lender and Administrative Agent, incorporated by reference from Form S-4 filed May 16, 2005.

4.9.1	First Amendment to Credit Agreement, dated October 12, 2005 among Securus Technologies, Inc., the subsidiary guarantors, ING Capital LLC, as syndicated issuing lender, alternative issuing lender and administrative agent, and lenders from time to time parties thereto, incorporated by reference from the Company’s current report on Form 8-K filed as Exhibit 10.1 on October 13, 2005.

4.9.2	Second Amendment to Credit Agreement, dated April 17, 2006 among Securus Technologies, Inc., the subsidiary guarantors, ING Capital LLC, as syndicated issuing lender, alternative issuing lender and administrative agent, and lenders from time to time parties thereto, incorporated by reference from Form 10-Q filed May 15, 2006.

4.9.3	Third Amendment to Credit Agreement, dated June 29, 2007, by and among Securus Technologies, Inc., as the Borrower, the Subsidiaries of the Borrower, as Guarantors, the Financial Institutions party thereto as the Lenders, and ING Capital LLC as the Issuing Lender and Administrative Agent incorporated by reference from Form 8-K filed July 2, 2007.

4.9.4	Fourth Amendment to the Credit Agreement, dated November 12,2007, by and among Securus Technologies, Inc., as the Borrower, the Subsidiaries of the Borrower, as Guarantors, the Financial Institutions party thereto as the Lenders, and ING Capital LLC as the Issuing Lender and Administrative Agent incorporated by reference from Form 8-K filed July 2, 2007.

4.9.5	Fifth Amendment to the Credit Agreement, dated March 20,2008, by and among Securus Technologies, Inc., as the Borrower, the Subsidiaries of the Borrower, as Guarantors, the Financial Institutions party thereto as the Lenders, and ING Capital LLC as the Issuing Lender and Administrative Agent incorporated by reference from Form 8-K filed July 2, 2007.

4.10	Subordination and Intercreditor Agreement, dated as of September 9, 2004, by and among Laminar Direct Capital, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership, Securus Technologies, Inc., T-Netix, Inc., a Delaware corporation, T-NETIX Telecommunications Services, Inc., a Texas corporation, T-Netix Monitoring Corporation, a Colorado corporation, SpeakEZ, Inc., a Colorado corporation, Telequip Labs, Inc., a Nevada corporation, Evercom Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation, Evercom, Inc., a Delaware corporation, EverConnect, Inc., a Delaware corporation, Evercom Systems, Inc., a Delaware corporation, and The Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A., incorporated by reference from Form S-4 filed May 16, 2005.

4.10.1	First Amendment to Subordination and Intercreditor Agreement, dated as of June 29, 2007, by and among Laminar Direct Capital, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership, Securus, T-Netix, Inc., a Delaware corporation, T-NETIX Telecommunications Services, Inc., a Texas corporation, Telequip Labs, Inc., a Nevada corporation, Evercom Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation, Evercom, Inc., a Delaware corporation, Evercom Systems, Inc., a Delaware corporation, Syscon Justice Systems, Inc., a California corporation, Modeling Solutions, LLC, a Wisconsin limited liability company, Modeling Solutions LLC, a Nevada limited liability company, and The Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A., incorporated by reference from Form S-4 filed August 1, 2007.

4.11	Intercreditor Agreement, dated as of September 9, 2004, by and among ING Capital, LLC, as Intercreditor Agent, The Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A., as Trustee, Securus Technologies, Inc., and each subsidiary of Securus Technologies, Inc., incorporated by reference from Form S-4 filed May 16, 2005.

4.12	Note Purchase Agreement, dated as of September 9, 2004, by and among Securus Technologies, Inc., T-Netix, Inc., Telequip Labs, Inc., T-Netix Telecommunications Services, Inc., SpeakEZ, Inc., T-Netix Monitoring Corporation, Evercom Holding, Inc., Evercom, Inc., Evercom Systems, Inc., FortuneLinX, Inc., and Everconnect, Inc. and Laminar Direct Capital L.P., incorporated by reference from the Company’s Form 10-K/A filed September 13, 2006.

4.12.1	June 2007 Amendment to Note Purchase Agreement, dated June 29, 2007, by and among Securus Technologies, Inc., T-Netix, Inc., Telequip Labs, Inc., T-Netix Telecommunications Services, Inc., Evercom Holding, Inc., Evercom, Inc., Evercom Systems, Inc., Appaloosa Acquisition Company Ltd., a British Columbia company, Modeling Solutions, LLC, a Wisconsin limited liability company, Modeling Solutions LLC, a Nevada limited liability company, Syscon Justice Systems International Pty Limited, an Australia company, Syscon Justice Systems International Limited, a United Kingdom company, Syscon Justice Systems Canada Ltd., a British Columbia company, Syscon Justice Systems, Inc., a California corporation, and Laminar Direct Capital L.P., incorporated by reference from Form 8-K filed July 2, 2007.

4.13	Form of 11% Second-priority Senior Secured Notes due 2011, incorporated by reference from Form S-4 filed August 1, 2007.

4.14	Security Agreement, dated June 29, 2007, by and among Appaloosa Acquisition Company Ltd., a British Columbia company, Syscon Justice Systems Canada Ltd., a British Columbia company, Syscon Holdings Ltd., a British Columbia corporation and The Bank of New York, as trustee, incorporated by reference from Form S-4 filed August 1, 2007.

4.15	Pledge Agreement, dated June 29, 2007, by and among Appaloosa Acquisition Company Ltd., a British Columbia company, Syscon Justice Systems Canada Ltd., a British Columbia company, and Syscon Holdings Ltd., a British Columbia corporation, The Bank of New York, as trustee, incorporated by reference from Form S-4 filed August 1, 2007.


4.16	Tradmark Security Agreement, dated June 29, 2007, by and among Appaloosa Acquisition Company Ltd., a British Columbia company, Syscon Justice Systems Canada Ltd., a British Columbia company, Syscon Holdings Ltd., a British Columbia corporation and The Bank of New York, as trustee, incorporated by reference from Form S-4 filed August 1, 2007.

4.17	Copyright Security Agreement, dated June 29, 2007, by and among Appaloosa Acquisition Company Ltd., a British Columbia company, Syscon Justice Systems Canada Ltd., a British Columbia company, Syscon Holdings Ltd., a British Columbia corporation and The Bank of New York, as trustee, incorporated by reference from Form S-4 filed August 1, 2007.

10.1	Stockholders Agreement, dated September 9, 2004, by and among Securus Technologies, Inc., H.I.G., T-Netix, Inc., a company organized under the laws of the Cayman Islands, American Capital Strategies, Ltd., a Delaware corporation, Laminar Direct Capital, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership, and each of the other investors then or thereafter set forth on the signature pages thereto, incorporated by reference from Form S-4 filed May 16, 2005.

10.2	Amended and Restated Consulting Services Agreement, dated as of September 9, 2004, by and between T-Netix, Inc., Evercom Systems, Inc. and H.I.G. Capital, LLC, incorporated by reference from Form S-4 filed May 16, 2005.

10.3	Amended and Restated Professional Services Agreement, dated as of September 9, 2004, by and between T-Netix, Inc., Evercom Systems, Inc., and H.I.G. Capital, LLC, incorporated by reference from Form S-4 filed May 16, 2005.

10.4	Office Lease Agreement, dated as of November 8, 2004, by and between T-Netix, Inc. and the Prudential Insurance Company of America, incorporated by reference from Form 10-Q filed August 15, 2005.

10.5	First Amendment to the Office Lease Agreement, dated as of November 19, 2004, by and between T-Netix, Inc. and the Prudential Insurance Company of America, incorporated by reference from Form 10-Q filed August 15, 2005.

10.6	Restricted Stock Purchase Agreement, dated as of September 9, 2004 between Securus Technologies, Inc. and Richard Falcone, incorporated by reference from Form S-4 filed May 16, 2005.

10.7	2004 Restricted Stock Purchase Plan, incorporated by reference from Form 10-Q filed November 14, 2006.

10.7.1	First Amendment to 2004 Restricted Stock Purchase Plan and Stockholder Consent, increasing authorized shares under the plan, incorporated by reference from Form 10-K filed March 30, 2007.

10.8	Employment Agreement, dated November 13, 2006, by and between the Company and Richard Falcone, incorporated by reference from Form 10-K filed November 14, 2006.

10.9	Restricted Stock Purchase Agreement, dated September, 2006 between Securus Technologies, Inc. and Richard Falcone, incorporated by reference from Form 10-K filed November 14, 2006.

10.10	Employment Agreement, dated June 11, 2008, by and between the Company and Richard A. Smith, incorporated by reference from Form 8-K filed June 13, 2008.

10.11	Restricted Stock Purchase Agreement, dated June 23, 2008, by and between Securus Technologies, Inc and Richard A. Smith, incorporated by reference from Form 8-K filed June 13, 2008.

Delaware		20-0673095
(State of other jurisdiction of		(I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization)		Identification Number)

Class		Outstanding at June 30, 2008
Class A Common Stock		604 shares
Class B Common Stock		68,561 shares

Purchase Price Calculation:
Payment for tendered shares	$	41,000
Costs incurred related to the acquisition		2,717
Value of common stock		1,414
	$	45,131

Allocation of Purchase Price:
Accounts receivable, net	$	5,981
Prepaid expenses and other assets		1,606
Property, plant and equipment		886
Goodwill		28,948
Intangibles		25,728
Accounts payable		(511	)
Accrued expenses		(2,398	)
Deferred revenue		(6,350	)
Net deferred tax liability		(8,759	)
Total Allocation	$	45,131

Period ending June 30		(unaudited)
2009	$	17,682
2010		16,242
2011		12,311
2012		10,591
2013		10,306
Thereafter		27,174
	$	94,306

Securus Technologies, Inc. – ‘10-Q’ for 6/30/08

On: Wednesday, 8/13/08, at 5:28pm ET · For: 6/30/08 · Accession #: 1320051-8-24 · File #: 333-124962

Previous ‘10-Q’: ‘10-Q’ on 5/15/08 for 3/31/08 · Next: ‘10-Q/A’ on 8/15/08 for 3/31/08 · Latest: ‘10-Q’ on 11/13/09 for 9/30/09

Quarterly Report — Form 10-Q
Filing Table of Contents

10-Q — Quarterly Report
Document Table of Contents

This is an HTML Document rendered as filed. [ Alternative Formats ]

Dates Referenced Herein and Documents Incorporated by Reference

	-	A reduction of $1.8 million due to the transition of an interim contract that expired in the second quarter of 2007 to a competitor. Additionally, we lost contracts with several departments of corrections during the second half of 2007, which resulted in a reduction of $3.9 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2008.

	-	A reduction of an estimated $1.7 million related to other factors, including the continuing economic downturn, as we have implemented tighter credit controls in an effort to reduce our bad debt exposure.

	-	An offsetting increase of $4.4 million was due primarily to new prime business contracts won from competitors, net of accounts not renewed. The newly-installed State of Florida Department of Corrections contract generated $3.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2008. Additionally, we installed the State of Arizona in April 2008 which generated $1.6 million in the second quarter, and we expect this account to generate approximately $6.0 million of annual revenue. We are installing Cook County, Illinois in the third quarter of 2008 and we expect this account to generate approximately $10 million of annual revenues.

	-	A reduction of $5.6 million due to the transition of an interim contract that expired in the second quarter of 2007 to a competitor. Additionally, we lost contracts with several departments of corrections during the second half of 2007, which resulted in a reduction of $7.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008.

	-	A reduction of an estimated $2.1 million related to other factors, including the continuing economic downturn, as we have implemented tighter credit controls in an effort to reduce our bad debt exposure.

	-	The decrease in revenues was offset by $5.9 million in new prime business contracts won from competitors, net of accounts not renewed. The newly-installed State of Florida Department of Corrections contract generated $6.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008. Additionally, we installed the State of Arizona in April of 2008 which generated $1.6 million in the second quarter of 2008, and we expect this account to generate approximately $6.0 million of annual revenue. We are installing Cook County, Illinois in the third quarter of 2008 and we expect this account to generate approximately $10.0 million of annual revenues.

-	revenue recognition and bad debt reserve estimates;

-	goodwill and other intangible assets;

-	accounting for income taxes; and

-	acquisition related assets and liabilities.

	SECURUS TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
	(Registrant)

DATE: August 13, 2008	By:	/s/ *RICHARD A. SMITH*
		Richard A. Smith,
		Chief Executive Officer and President



DATE: August 13, 2008	By:	/s/ *WILLIAM D. MARKERT*
		William D. Markert
		Chief Financial Officer

10.12	Employment Agreement, dated June 20, 2008, by and between the Company and William D. Markert, incorporated by reference from Form 8-K filed June 24, 2008.

10.13	Restricted Stock Purchase Agreement, dated June 30, 2008, by and between Securus Technologies, Inc and William D. Markert, incorporated by reference from Form 8-K filed June 24, 2008.

14.1	Securus Code of Ethics, incorporated by reference from 10-K filed March 30, 2007.

21.1	Schedule of Subsidiaries of Securus, incorporated by reference from Form S-4 filed August 1, 2007.

31.1*	Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley of 2002.

31.2*	Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley of 2002.

32.1*	Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley of 2002.

32.2*	Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley of 2002.

This ‘10-Q’ Filing	Date	Other Filings

	9/9/14
	9/9/13
	6/30/13
	7/1/12
	9/9/11
	1/1/10
	9/9/09
	6/30/09	10-Q
	2/2/09
	1/5/09	8-K
	1/1/09
	12/31/08	10-K
	12/15/08
Filed on:	8/13/08	8-K
	8/12/08
	8/4/08
	8/1/08
For Period End:	6/30/08	10-Q/A
	6/24/08	8-K
	6/23/08
	6/20/08
	6/18/08
	6/13/08	8-K
	6/11/08	8-K
	5/22/08
	4/15/08
	4/11/08
	4/9/08
	4/1/08
	2/14/08
	2/8/08
	1/15/08
	1/10/08
	1/3/08	8-K
	1/1/08
	12/31/07	10-K, 10-K/A
	12/15/07
	9/25/07
	8/1/07	S-4
	7/2/07	8-K
	6/30/07	10-Q
	6/29/07	8-K
	6/27/07
	4/16/07	8-K
	4/11/07
	3/30/07	10-K
	3/1/07
	1/1/07
	12/31/06	10-K
	11/14/06	10-Q
	11/13/06
	9/13/06	10-K/A
	5/15/06	10-Q
	4/17/06
	10/13/05	8-K
	10/12/05	8-K
	8/15/05	10-Q
	5/16/05	S-4
	11/19/04
	11/8/04
	9/9/04
	3/3/04
	1/12/04
	2/19/03
	11/25/02
	9/7/01
	8/22/97
		List all Filings