SEC Info  
    Home      Search      My Interests      Help      Sign In      Please Sign In

Isramco Inc – ‘10-K’ for 12/31/04

On:  Wednesday, 3/30/05, at 5:32pm ET   ·   As of:  3/31/05   ·   For:  12/31/04   ·   Accession #:  1188112-5-575   ·   File #:  0-12500

Previous ‘10-K’:  ‘10-K/A’ on 8/16/04 for 12/31/03   ·   Next:  ‘10-K’ on 3/24/06 for 12/31/05   ·   Latest:  ‘10-K/A’ on 4/30/19 for 12/31/18

Find Words in Filings emoji
 
  in    Show  and   Hints

  As Of                Filer                Filing    For·On·As Docs:Size              Issuer               Agent

 3/31/05  Isramco Inc                       10-K       12/31/04    4:249K                                   Toppan Vite NY Inc./FA

Annual Report   —   Form 10-K
Filing Table of Contents

Document/Exhibit                   Description                      Pages   Size 

 1: 10-K        Annual Report                                         54    315K 
 2: EX-31       Certification per Sarbanes-Oxley Act (Section 302)     2±     9K 
 3: EX-32       Certification per Sarbanes-Oxley Act (Section 906)     1      6K 
 4: EX-99.1     Miscellaneous Exhibit                                 36    143K 


10-K   —   Annual Report
Document Table of Contents

Page (sequential) | (alphabetic) Top
 
11st Page   -   Filing Submission
6Table of Overriding Royalties
7Summary of exploration efforts in Israel
"Med Yavne Lease
10Risk Factors
15Item 2. Properties
"Item 3. Legal Proceeding
"Item 4. Submission of Matters to A Vote of Security Holders
"Item 5. Market for Registrant's Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters
16Item 6. Selected Financial Data (Consolidated)
17Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
23Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
"Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
"Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
24Item 9A. Controls and Procedures
"Item 9B. Other Information
26Item 15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K (a) Exhibits
29Index to Financial Statements
10-K1st Page of 54TOCTopPreviousNextBottomJust 1st
 

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-K [X] ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2004 [ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 COMMISSION FILE NUMBER: 0-12500 ISRAMCO, INC. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) Delaware 13-3145265 (State or Other Jurisdiction IRS Employer Identification No.) of Incorporation) 11767 KATY FREEWAY, HOUSTON, TX 77079 (Address of Principal Executive Offices) 713-621-3882 (Registrant's Telephone Number, including Area Code) Securities registered under Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act: None Securities registered under Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act: Common Stock, par value $0.001 (Title of Class) Indicate by check mark whether the issuer (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the past 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. |X| Yes |_| No Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers in response to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained in this Form, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. |X| Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). | | Yes |X| No As of March 30, 2005, the Registrant had outstanding 2,717,891 shares of $0.01 par value Common Stock. The aggregate market value of such Common Stock held by non-affiliates of the Registrant at March 30, 2005 was approximately $11.8 million. Such market value was calculated by using the closing price of such common stock as of such date reported on the NASDAQ market. DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE The information called for in Items 10, 11, 12 and 13 in Part III will be contained in the issuer's definitive proxy statement which the issuer intends to file within 120 days after the end of the Issuer's fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 and such information is incorporated herein by reference. -1-
10-K2nd Page of 54TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 2nd
ISRAMCO, INC. 2004 FORM 10-K ANNUAL REPORT TABLE OF CONTENTS PART I ITEM 1. DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS......................................... 3 ITEM 2. DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY......................................... 15 ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS............................................... 15 ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS............. 15 PART II ITEM 5. MARKET FOR COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS........ 15 ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA......................................... 16 ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION..... 17 ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISKS..... 23 ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA..................... 23 ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE........................................ 23 ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES......................................... 24 ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION............................................... 24 PART III ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, PROMOTERS AND CONTROL PERSONS; COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 16(A) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT............... 24 ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION.......................................... 24 ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS................................. 24 ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS.................. 24 ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES & SERVICES............................ 24 ITEM 15. EXHIBITS........................................................ 26 -2-
10-K3rd Page of 54TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 3rd
FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS CERTAIN STATEMENTS MADE IN THIS ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K ARE "FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS" WITHIN THE MEANING OF THE PRIVATE SECURITIES LITIGATION REFORM ACT OF 1995. FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS CAN BE IDENTIFIED BY TERMINOLOGY SUCH AS "MAY", "WILL", "SHOULD", "EXPECTS", "INTENDS", "ANTICIPATES", "BELIEVES", "ESTIMATES", "PREDICTS", OR "CONTINUE" OR THE NEGATIVE OF THESE TERMS OR OTHER COMPARABLE TERMINOLOGY AND INCLUDE, WITHOUT LIMITATION, STATEMENTS BELOW REGARDING exploration and drilling plans, future general and administrative expenses, future growth, future exploration, future geophysical and geological data, generation of additional properties, reserves, new prospects and drilling locations, future capital expenditures, sufficiency of working capital, ability to raise additional capital, projected cash flows from operations, outcome of any legal proceedings, drilling plans, the number, timing or results of any wells, interpretation and results of seismic surveys or seismic data, future production or reserves, lease options or rights, PARTICIPATION OF OPERATING PARTNERS, CONTINUED RECEIPT OF ROYALTIES, and any other statements regarding future operations, financial results, opportunities, growth, business plans and strategy. BECAUSE FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS INVOLVE RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES, THERE ARE IMPORTANT FACTORS THAT COULD CAUSE ACTUAL RESULTS TO DIFFER MATERIALLY FROM THOSE EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED BY THESE FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS. ALTHOUGH THE COMPANY BELIEVES THAT EXPECTATIONS REFLECTED IN THE FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS ARE REASONABLE, IT CANNOT GUARANTEE FUTURE RESULTS, PERFORMANCE OR ACHIEVEMENTS. MOREOVER, NEITHER THE COMPANY NOR ANY OTHER PERSON ASSUMES RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE ACCURACY AND COMPLETENESS OF THESE FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS. THE COMPANY IS UNDER NO DUTY TO UPDATE ANY FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS AFTER THE DATE OF THIS REPORT TO CONFORM SUCH STATEMENTS TO ACTUAL RESULTS. PART I ITEM 1. BUSINESS GENERAL Since its formation in 1982, Isramco, Inc. ("Isramco" or the "Company") has been active in the exploration of oil and gas in Israel and in the United States. In Israel, the Company holds a participation interest in two long- term off-shore leases and serves as an operator of one. In addition the Company holds a participation interest in an off-shore license and also serves as the operator. See "Summary of exploration efforts in Israel". In the United States, the Company, through its wholly-owned subsidiaries, Jay Petroleum LLC ("Jay Petroleum") and Jay Management LLC ("Jay Management"), is involved in oil and gas exploration and production in the United States. Jay Petroleum owns varying working interests in oil and gas wells in Louisiana, Texas, Oklahoma and Wyoming. Independent estimates of the reserves held by Jay Petroleum as of December 31, 2004 are approximately 140,000 net barrels of proved developed producing oil and 2,011 MMCFs of proved developed producing natural gas. See "Summary of Exploration Efforts in United States". THE OPERATOR OF THE ISRAELI LEASES/LICENSES Under a joint operating agreement entered into among the participants in the off-shore leases and licenses (collectively, the "JOA"), each party participates in all the costs, expenses and obligations incurred in relation to a contract area in the same proportion as its rights and interests in such contract area. Under the JOA, the Operator carries out all the operations contemplated in the JOA, in the framework of approved Work Programs and within the limitations of approved budgets (AFE's). The Operator may be removed for cause, by notice in writing given by two or more of the other parties representing at least 65% of the total interests in a contract area. The Company is currently the Operator of the Med Ashdod Lease . As the Operator, the Company is responsible for directing the oil exploration and drilling activities of the Venture through its Branch Office in Petach Tikva, Israel. -3-
10-K4th Page of 54TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 4th
With eight full-time employees, outside consultants and subcontractors, the Company carries out the operations of the Venture within the framework of approved work programs and budgets and pursuant to the terms of a JOA. With respect to the Med Yavne Lease, the Company furnishes to BG International Limited, a member of the British Gas Group ("BG"), the operator of the lease, consulting services of an administrative and technical nature for which it receives a monthly fee equal to $10,000. As operator, the Company charges each venture participant for all costs incurred in connection with the exploration and drilling activities conducted by the Med Ashdod venture and is entitled to receive a fee for its administrative overhead equal to 6% of all direct charges or minimum monthly compensation of $6,000 per each License/Lease. During the year ended December 31, 2004, the Company was paid a total of $137,000 as operator fees. GENERAL PARTNER FOR THE ISRAMCO NEGEV 2 LIMITED PARTNERSHIP In 1989 the Company formed in Israel the Isramco Negev 2 Limited Partnership (the "Limited Partnership") to acquire from the Company a substantial portion of its working interest in the Negev 2 Venture, the venture which the Company and related parties established to hold the rights to the certain oil and gas properties. In exchange for working interests, the Limited Partnership granted to the Company certain overriding royalties. In 1992, the Company transferred to the Limited Partnership additional rights in exchange for additional overriding royalties and reimbursement of expenses. The Company created Isramco Oil and Gas Ltd. ("IOG"), a wholly-owned subsidiary to act as the General Partner for the Limited Partnership and formed Isramco Management (1988) Ltd., a wholly-owned subsidiary to act as the Limited Partner and the nominee of Limited Partnership units held by public investors in Israel. Pursuant to the Limited Partnership Agreement and the Trust Agreement, a Supervisor was appointed on behalf of the Limited Partnership unit holders, with sole authority to appoint the sole director for Isramco Management (1988) Ltd. and to supervise its activities on behalf of and for the benefit of the Limited Partnership unit holders. The control and management of the Limited Partnership vests with the General Partner, however, matters involving certain rights of the Limited Partnership unit holders are subject to the supervision of the Supervisor and in certain instances the approval of the Limited Partnership unit holders. The firm of Igal Brightman & Co., Accountants and Mr. David Valiano, Accountant has been appointed as Supervisors. The Company currently receives through IOG a management fee of $40,000 per month from the Limited Partnership for office space, management and other services. It has been significant to the Company that the Limited Partnership (in part through the efforts of the Company and others), has been able to raise monies from the public in Israel to fund the Limited Partnership's share of the work programs for the Petroleum Assets in connection with the continuation of oil and gas exploration activities in Israel and to preserve the existence of the Company's overriding royalties. The Company currently holds 6.65% of the issued Partnership units and IOG holds an additional 0.008% of the Partnership units. On December 31, 2004, the Limited Partnership had cash, cash equivalents, certificates of deposit and marketable securities with a value of approximately $129 million. Additionally, IOG (as the general partner) is entitled to 5% overriding royalties in certain petroleum assets held by the Limited Partnership. NON-OIL AND GAS PROPERTIES In June 2002, the Company purchased non oil and gas producing real estate located in Israel at an aggregate cost of $1,887,000. Concurrently with the purchase of the real estate, the Company entered into a lease agreement with a third party to lease the property for a 24-month period at a monthly rent of $7,000. As of January 1, 2004, the Company entered into an agreement with a related entity pursuant to which the property is leased to such entity at a monthly rent of $7,000. In March 2004, the Company purchased a luxury cruise liner for aggregate consideration of $8,050,000. The vessel, a Bahamas flagged ship, contains 270 passenger cabins spread out over nine decks. The Company, through its wholly owned subsidiary, leased the vessel to Israeli based tour operators between July and October of fiscal 2004 and, commencing April 14, 2005, the vessel has been leased to tour operator for a period through October 31, 2005. In addition, the Company holds certain equity interests in a high-tech venture. -4-
10-K5th Page of 54TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 5th
OIL AND GAS VENTURES AND PETROLEUM ASSETS OIL AND GAS VENTURES AND PETROLEUM ASSETS LOCATED IN ISRAEL The table below sets forth the Working Interests and Petroleum Assets of the Company and all affiliated and non-affiliated participants in (i) the Ventures, (ii) the Petroleum Assets, (iii) the total acreage of each Petroleum Asset, and (iv) the expiration dates of each of the licenses as of December 31, 2004. This information pertains only to Petroleum Assets located in Israel. The Company also holds Overriding Royalties in the Petroleum Assets. See "Table of Overriding Royalties". [Enlarge/Download Table] TABLE OF PETROLEUM ASSETS (WORKING INTEREST) OIL AND GAS VENTURES (1)(3) (% Interest of 100%) Name of Participant Med Yavne Lease* Med Ashdod Lease**(2) The Company 0.4584 0.3625 Affiliates Isramco Negev 2, Limited 32.411 19.1370 Partnership I.O.C. 7.800 7.800 I.N.O.C. Dead Sea -- 5.0525 Limited Partnership Naphtha 1.8033 -- Naphtha Explorations 2.2826 1.8411 Limited Partnership JOEL 2.8807 -- Equital 2.1639 -- Non-affiliated entities Delek Drilling LP -- 21.7658 GRANIT - SONOL LP -- 35.000 BG International Ltd. 35.000 -- Middle East Energy (MEE) LP 5.400 5.400 DOR - Gas LP 1.800 1.8000 Other 1.8411 Total 100.000 100.000 Area (acres) 13,100 61,800 Expiration Date 6/10/2030 6/15/2030 -5-
10-K6th Page of 54TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 6th
* The lease was granted in June 2000 and is scheduled to expire in June 2030. ** The lease was granted in January 2002 and is scheduled to expire in June 2030. (1) Subject to the fulfillment of applicable provisions of the Israel Petroleum Law and Regulations, and the conditions and work obligations of each of the above licenses/Leases. (2) Under the Grant Agreement with the Government of Israel, the Government may claim that the Company is contingently obligated to repay to the Government the Grant monies in the amount of $110,000 and to pay a 6.5 % Overriding Royalty on all production from the area. (3) All of the Petroleum Assets are subject to a 12.5% Overriding Royalty due to the Government of Israel under the Petroleum Law. OVERRIDING ROYALTIES HELD BY THE COMPANY The Company holds overriding royalties in certain petroleum assets. Additionally, in connection with the BG Transaction, the Company is entitled to receive from each member of the Isramco Group overriding royalties equal to 2% of each such member's rights to any oil/gas produced within the existing offshore licenses or within any new licenses or to any oil or gas rights which may be obtained in lieu of existing offshore licenses. The Company holds the following Overriding Royalties: TABLE OF OVERRIDING ROYALTIES From the Limited Partnership, on the first 10% of the Limited Partnership's share of the following Petroleum Licenses [Download Table] Before Payout After Payout Med Yavne Lease* 1% 13% Med Ashdod Lease** 1% 13% From JOEL On 8% of JOEL's Interest Before Payout After Payout Med Ashdod Lease 2.5% 12.5% From Delek Oil Exploration Ltd. (DOEX) (1)(2) On 6% of DOEX's Interest Before Payout After Payout Med Ashdod Lease 2.5% 12.5% From Naphtha, Naphtha Exploration LP, Joel, Equital, INOC Dead Sea L P on oil and/or gas produced on the Med Leases 2% To IOC On Certain petroleum rights held by Limited Partnership 5% * A 30 year lease covering an area of approximately 53 square kilometers (including the area of the gas discovery) was granted in June 2000. ** A 30-year lease covering an area of approximately 250 square kilometers (including the area of the gas discovery) was granted in January 2002. -6-
10-K7th Page of 54TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 7th
(1) The Working Interests of Delek and DOEX have been assigned to Delek Drilling Limited Partnership. (2) In a prospectus of the Delek Limited Partnership dated January 26, 1994 it is stated that the Interest which the Delek L.P, received from Delek and DOEX is free from any encumbrances except that Isramco, Inc. may argue that the Interests are subject to an overriding royalty. The Company has no information available to it as to why this statement is in the Delek L.P. prospectus. Summary Description of the Ventures, the Petroleum Assets, Related Work Obligations and Exploration Efforts. The Company has no financial obligation with regard to the Overriding Royalties, however, in the event the Limited Partnership, JOEL, DOEX or Delek, fails to fund its obligation with regard to a Petroleum Asset to which an Overriding Royalty exists, the Company could lose its interest in such Overriding Royalty. See Glossary for definition of "Payout ". SUMMARY OF EXPLORATION EFFORTS IN ISRAEL MED YAVNE LEASE Based on the gas finds known as "Or 1" and "Or South" , a 30 years lease was granted in June 2000 (hereinafter: the "Med Yavne Lease"). The Med Yavne Lease covers 53 square kilometers (approximately 13,000 acres) offshore Israel. The operator of the Med Yavne Lease is BG International Limited, a member of the British Gas Group ("BG"). According to the operator's estimates, which are based on the results of the drillings in the "Or 1" and "Or South" wells, and a three-dimensional seismic survey performed in the area of the lease which also covered parts of nearby gas reserves (outside the area of the lease), the recoverable gas reserves in the Med Yanve Lease is estimated at 93 billion cubic feet, out of which it is estimated that approximately 51 billion cubic feet are in Or 1. In November 2002, the Company received an opinion from a consulting firm in the United States that performed a techno-economic examination for the development of the "Or 1" reserve. The opinion indicates that, under certain assumptions, development of the reserve by connection to a nearby platform (at a distance of 7 Miles) and from there via an existing transportation pipeline to the coast, may be economically feasible. As of the filing of this annual report no decision has been made regarding the development of "Or 1" reserve. The Company's participation share of the Med Yavne Lease is 0.4585%. MED ASHDOD LEASE GENERAL Following the results of "Nir 1" drilling, a 30 year lease was granted in January 2002. The Med Ashdod Lease covers approximately 250 square kilometers (approximately 62,000 acres) offshore Israel. The Company serves as the operator of the Med Ashdod Lease and holds a 0.3625% interest therein. On February 15, 2004, the operator presented the partners with two drilling prospect (a) Nizanim 1 Well (b) Yam 3 Well to a total depth of 5,700 meter (18,700 feet), at a total budget of $40 million. The drilling of "Yam 3" is subject to the approval of the Ministry of Defense. The Company has received notice from partners representing approximately 38.5% interest in the lease of their readiness to invest in Yam 3 Well. On July 25, 2004 the Company, or behalf of Isramco Negev 2 L.P. well will be drilled issued a Sole Risk notice to the other partners in the Lease to drill Yam 3 well. On July 27, 2004, the Israeli Ministry of Defense advised the Company that the Ministry will not approve the drilling of Yam 3 on the basis of the data submitted. The Company and the Ministry are currently in the process of exploring other alternatives. In October 2004 the Commissioner granted the Operator's request and approved postponement of execution of the Drilling in "Yam 3" up to December 1, 2005. As of March 30, 2005, the Company is unable to estimate if and when the said drilling will be executed. No assurance can be given that the Ministry will in fact approve any alternative that is acceptable to the partners. On February 28, 2005, the Company ,on behalf of Isramco Negev 2 LP,issued a Sole Risk notice to the other partners in the Leas to drill a gas well to a total depth of 2,600 meter (8,530)at a total budget of $13 million. As of March 30, 2005, the Company is unable to estimate if the well will be drilled. -7-
10-K8th Page of 54TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 8th
SUMMARY OF EXPLORATION EFFORTS IN THE UNITED STATES The Company, through its wholly-owned subsidiaries, Jay Petroleum LLC ("Jay Petroleum") and Jay Management LLC ("Jay Management"), is involved in oil and gas production in the United States. Jay Petroleum owns varying working interests in oil and gas wells in Louisiana, Texas, Oklahoma and Wyoming. Independent estimates of the reserves held by Jay Petroleum as of December 31, 2004 are approximately 140,000 net barrels of proved developed producing oil and 2,011 net MMCFs of proved developed producing natural gas. Jay Management acts as the operator of certain of the producing oil and gas interests owned or acquired by Jay Petroleum. In March 2004, the Company initiated the drilling of a proved undeveloped well located in Enid County Oklahoma. With respect to this well the Company entered into participation agreement with a company in Oklahoma. Under the agreement the Company will invest 75% and will hold 50% working interest in the well. The well was drilled to a total depth of 6,920 feet and completed for production from two zones. The average daily production is 100 Mcf of gas and 7 BBL of oil. The total investment of the Company in this well is in a sum of $472,000. In December 2004, the Company drilled a well in East Texas to a total depth of 3,393 feet. The daily production from the well is 300 Mcf of gas. The total investment of the Company in this well is $273,000. The Company holds 80% working interests in the well. The Company holds 15% working interest in an additional well in Dune Energy Hamilton, Texas. The well was drilled do a total depth of 9,900 feet. The total investment of the Company in this well is in a sum of $227,000. The Company holds 5% working Interest in a third well Dune Energy Vaquero, Texas. As of the filing of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, drilling has begun. The total budget of the well is in a sum of $3,500,000. At present, the well's data (drilling results, logs) are being analyzed to determine the testing zones. Management is currently evaluating a number of potential prospects to be drilled in 2005. NON-OIL AND GAS PROPERTIES MIRAGE 1 CRUISE LINER OVERVIEW In March 2004, the Company purchased a luxury cruise liner (the "Vessel") for aggregate consideration of $8,050,000. The Vessel, a Bahamas flagged ship, contains 270 passenger cabins spread out over nine decks. The Company leased the Vessel to an Israeli based tour operator for the period from July 1, 2004 through October 17, 2004 at a daily rate of $21,500. Title to the Vessel is in Magic 1 Cruise Line Corp., a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company ("Magic").As of December 31, 2004 the Company expended approximately $1 million in respect of the maintenance, repairs renovation, and upkeep of the vessel. CRUISE LINE BUSINESS Cruise lines compete for consumers' disposable leisure time spending with other vacation alternatives such as land-based resort hotels and sightseeing destinations. Demand for such activities is influenced by, among other things, geo-political and general economic conditions. The Company believes that cruise passengers currently represent only a small share of the vacation market and that a significant portion of cruise passengers carried are first-time cruisers. The Company's principal operating strategy is to lease the Vessel through time charter or bareboat charter. Under a bareboat charter the lessee operates the vessel and solely bears all expenses associated with the operation, maintenance -8-
10-K9th Page of 54TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 9th
and upkeep of the Vessel. Under a time charter the owner of the Vessel is responsible for those expenses and provides a crew. Under a time charter, the lessee is responsible for marketing, itinerary and providing all cruise line services to passengers. Generally, revenue from time charter are higher than with respect to bareboat charters. Cruising in the Mediterranean is generally from April to October. So long as the Vessel is leased for use in the Mediterranean, the Company anticipates that revenues from the lease of the Vessel will remain seasonal. In May 2004, Magic entered into a time charter with an Israeli based tour operator for the period from July 1, 2004 through October, 2004 at a daily rate of $21,500. The tour operator targeted the Israeli consumer market and promoted Vessel cruises to various destinations in the Mediterranean including Cyprus, Greek islands and Turkey. In March 2005 Magic entered into a bareboat charter with a European based tour operator for the lease of the Vessel for the period from April 14, 2005 through October 31, 2005 at a daily rate of $8,000. Under the bareboat charter the tour operator will operate the Vessel in and around the Mediterranean and will solely bear all outlays associated with the operation, maintenance and upkeep of the Vessel. Contemporaneous with its entry into the bareboat charter the tour operator entered into an agreement (the "Marketing Agreement") with a subsidiary of one of the leading transportation companies in Israel ("the "Marketing Party") pursuant to which the operator granted to the Marketing Party the exclusive marketing of the tours on the Vessel, and under which the Operator is entitled to minimum payments from the Marketing Party. In connection with the bareboat charter, on March 9, 2005, the Company furnished a limited guarantee (the "Guarantee") to and in favor of the Marketing Party, pursuant to which the Company undertook to indemnify the Marketing Party in an amount not exceeding $1 million in respect of any loss or damage incurred by the Marketing Party arising out of the breach by the Operator of its obligations under the Marketing Agreement. To induce the Company to issue the Guarantee, the Operator granted to the Company a security interest on all amounts due to it under the Marketing Agreement and agreed to provide the Company with a bank guarantee in the amount of $600,000 (which will secure its obligations under the bareboat charter as well). Recent actions by Israeli authorities to declare the Vessel an `Israeli vessel' under a time charter is likely to increase the costs associated with the operation of the vessel and may potentially reduce the net income for leasing the Vessel. See "Risk Factors" -9-
10-K10th Page of 54TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 10th
REGULATORY The operation of the Vessel is subject to various international laws and regulations relating to environmental protection. Under such laws and regulations, the Company are prohibited from, among other things, discharging certain materials, such as petrochemicals and plastics, into the waterways. The Company have made, and will continue to make, capital and other expenditures to comply with environmental laws and regulations. From time to time, environmental and other regulators consider more stringent regulations which may affect operations and increase Company's compliance costs. The Company believes that the impact of cruise ships on the global environment will continue to be an area of focus by the relevant authorities throughout the world and, accordingly, this will likely subject to increasing compliance costs in the future. The Company believes that The Company is in material compliance with all the regulations applicable to the Vessel and that have all licenses necessary to conduct our business. Health, safety, security and financial responsibility issues are, and believe will continue to be, an area of focus by the relevant government authorities . From time to time, various regulatory and legislative changes may be proposed that could impact our operations and would likely subject to increasing compliance costs in the future. REAL ESTATE IN ISRAEL In June 2002, the Company purchased non oil and gas producing real estate located in Israel at an aggregate cost of $1,887,000. Concurrently with the purchase of the real estate, the Company entered into a lease agreement with a third party to lease the property for a 24-month period at a monthly rent of $7,000. The lease agreement was terminated on December 31, 2003 and as of December 1, 2004, the Company entered into an agreement with a related entity pursuant to which the property is leased to such entity at a monthly rent of $7,000 through December 31, 2005. EMPLOYEES As of March 30, 2005, the Company had eight employees at its branch office in Israel and three employees in its office in Houston, Texas. RISK FACTORS In addition to the other information contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, investors should consider carefully the following risks. If any of these risks occurs, the Company's business, financial condition or operating results could be adversely affected. RISKS RELATED THE COMPANY'S OIL AND GAS BUSINESS OIL AND GAS DRILLING IS A SPECULATIVE ACTIVITY AND risky The Company is engaged in the business of oil and natural gas exploration and the resulting development of productive oil and gas wells. The Company's growth will be materially dependent upon the success of its future drilling program. Drilling for oil and gas involves numerous risks, including the risk that no commercially productive oil or natural gas reservoirs will be encountered. The cost of drilling, completing and operating wells is substantial and uncertain, and drilling operations may be curtailed, delayed or cancelled as a result of a variety of factors beyond the -10-
10-K11th Page of 54TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 11th
Company's control, including unexpected drilling conditions, pressure or irregularities in formations, equipment failures or accidents, adverse weather conditions, compliance with governmental requirements and shortages or delays in the availability of drilling rigs or crews and the delivery of equipment. Although the Company believes that its use of 3-D seismic data and other advanced technology should increase the probability of success of its wells and should reduce average finding costs through elimination of prospects that might otherwise be drilled solely on the basis of 2-D seismic data and other traditional methods, drilling remains an inexact and speculative activity. In addition, the use of 3-D seismic data and such technologies requires greater pre-drilling expenditures than traditional drilling strategies and the Company could incur losses as a result of such expenditures. The Company's future drilling activities may not be successful and, if unsuccessful, such failure could have an adverse effect on the Company's future results of operations and financial condition. Although the Company may discuss drilling prospects that have been identified or budgeted for, the Company may ultimately not lease or drill these prospects within the expected time frame, or at all. The Company may identify prospects through a number of methods, some of which do not include interpretation of 3-D or other seismic data. The drilling and results for these prospects may be particularly uncertain. The final determination with respect to the drilling of any scheduled or budgeted wells will be dependent on a number of factors, including (i) the results of exploration efforts and the acquisition, review and analysis of the seismic data, (ii) the availability of sufficient capital resources to the Company and the other participants for the drilling of the prospects, (iii) the approval of the prospects by other participants after additional data has been compiled, (iv) economic and industry conditions at the time of drilling, including prevailing and anticipated prices for oil and natural gas and the availability of drilling rigs and crews, (v) the Company's financial resources and results (vi) the availability of leases and permits on reasonable terms for the prospects and (vii) the payment of royalties to lessors. There can be no assurance that these projects can be successfully developed or that the wells discussed will, if drilled, encounter reservoirs of commercially productive oil or natural gas. There are numerous uncertainties in estimating quantities of proved reserves, including many factors beyond the Company's control. THE OIL AND NATURAL GAS RESERVE DATA INCLUDED IN THIS REPORT ARE ONLY ESTIMATES AND MAY PROVE TO BE INACCURATE. There are numerous uncertainties inherent in estimating oil and natural gas reserves and their estimated values. The reserve data in this report represent only estimates that may prove to be inaccurate because of these uncertainties. Estimates of economically recoverable oil and natural gas reserves depend upon a number of variable factors, such as historical production from the area compared with production from other producing areas and assumptions concerning effects of regulations by governmental agencies, future oil and natural gas prices, future operating costs, severance and excise taxes, development costs and workover and remedial costs, some or all of these assumptions may in fact vary considerably from actual results. For these reasons, estimates of the economically recoverable quantities of oil and natural gas attributable to any particular group of properties, classifications of such reserves based on risk of recovery, and estimates of the future net cash flows expected therefrom prepared by different engineers or by the same engineers but at different times may vary substantially. Accordingly, reserve estimates may be subject to downward or upward adjustment. Actual production, revenue and expenditures with respect to the Company's reserves will likely vary from estimates, and such variances may be material. THERE IS A POSSIBILITY THAT THE COMPANY WILL LOSE THE LEASES TO ITS OIL AND GAS PROPERTIES. The Company's oil and gas revenues are generated through leases to the oil and gas properties or, in the case of Israeli based properties, licenses that, subject to certain conditions, may result in leases being granted. The leases are subject to certain obligations and are renewable at the discretion of various governmental authorities, as such, the Company may not be able to fulfill its obligations under the leases which may result in the modification or cancellation of such leases, or such leases may not be renewed or may be renewed on terms different from the current leases. The modification or cancellation of the Company's leases may have a material impact on the Company's revenues. COMPETITION IN THE INDUSTRY MAY IMPAIR THE COMPANY'S ABILITY TO EXPLORE, DEVELOP AND COMMERCIALIZE ITS OIL AND GAS PROPERTIES. The oil and natural gas industry is very competitive. Competition is particularly intense in the acquisition of prospective oil and natural gas properties and oil and gas reserves. The Company competes with a substantial number of other companies having larger technical staffs and greater financial and operational resources. Many such companies not -11-
10-K12th Page of 54TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 12th
only engage in the acquisition, exploration, development and production of oil and natural gas reserves, but also carry on refining operations, electricity generation and the marketing of refined products. The Company also competes with major and independent oil and gas companies in the marketing and sale of oil and natural gas, and the oil and natural gas industry in general competes with other industries supplying energy and fuel to industrial, commercial and individual consumers. The Company competes with other oil and natural gas companies in attempting to secure drilling rigs and other equipment necessary for drilling and completion of wells. Such equipment may be in short supply from time to time. THE COMPANY'S BUSINESS MAY BE AFFECTED BY OIL AND GAS PRICE VOLATILITY. Historically, natural gas and oil prices have been volatile. These prices rise and fall based on changes in market demand and changes in the political, regulatory and economic climate and other factors that affect commodities markets that are generally outside of the Company's control. Some of the Company's projections and estimates are based on assumptions as to the future prices of natural gas and crude oil. These price assumptions are used for planning purposes. The Company expects that its assumptions will change over time and that actual prices in the future may differ from its estimates. Any substantial or extended decline in the actual prices of natural gas and/or crude oil may have a material adverse effect on the Company's financial position and results of operations (including reduced cash flow and borrowing capacity), the quantities of natural gas and crude oil reserves that it can economically produce and the quantity of estimated proved reserves that may be attributed to its properties THE COMPANY HAS NO MEANS TO MARKET ITS OIL AND GAS PRODUCTION WITHOUT THE ASSISTANCE OF THIRD PARTIES. The marketability of the Company's production depends upon the proximity of its reserves to, and the capacity of, facilities and third party services, including oil and natural gas gathering systems, pipelines, trucking or terminal facilities, and processing facilities. The unavailability or lack of capacity of such services and facilities could impair or delay the production of new wells or the delay or discontinuance of development plans for properties. A shut-in or delay or discontinuance could adversely affect the Company's financial condition. In addition, regulation of oil and natural gas production transportation in the United States or in other countries may affect its ability to produce and market its oil and natural gas on a profitable basis. THE COMPANY IS SUBJECT TO RISKS ASSOCIATED WITH INTERNATIONAL OPERATIONS. The Company conducts business from its facilities in Israel and the United States. Its international operations and activities subject the Company to a number of risks, including the risk of political and economic instability, difficulty in managing foreign operations, potentially adverse taxes, higher expenses and difficulty in collection of accounts receivable. Although the Company Israeli subsidiary receives most of its operating funds in U.S. dollars, a portion of its payroll and other expenses and certain of its investments are fixed in the currency of Israel. Because the Company's financial results are reported in U.S. dollars, they are affected by changes in the value of the various foreign currencies that the Company uses to make payments in relation to the U.S. dollar. THE COMPANY'S OPERATIONS MAY BE IMPACTED BY CERTAIN RISKS COMMON IN THE INDUSTRY. The Company's exploration and drilling operations are subject to various risks common in the industry, including cratering, explosions, fires and uncontrollable flows of oil, gas or well fluids. The drilling operations are also subject to the risk that no commercially productive natural gas or oil reserves will be encountered. The cost of drilling, completing and operating wells is often uncertain, and drilling operations may be curtailed, delayed or canceled as a result of a variety of factors, including drilling conditions, pressure or irregularities in formations, equipment failures or accidents and adverse weather conditions. In accordance with industry practice, the Company maintains insurance against some, but not all, of the risks described above. The Company cannot provide assurance that its insurance will be adequate to cover losses or liabilities. Also, it cannot predict the continued availability of insurance at premium levels that justify its purchase. -12-
10-K13th Page of 54TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 13th
GOVERNMENT REGULATION AND LIABILITY FOR ENVIRONMENTAL MATTERS MAY ADVERSELY AFFECT THE COMPANY'S BUSINESS AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS. Oil and natural gas operations are subject to various federal, state and local government regulations, which may be changed from time to time. Matters subject to regulation include discharge permits for drilling operations, drilling bonds, reports concerning operations, the spacing of wells, unitization and pooling of properties and taxation. From time to time, regulatory agencies have imposed price controls and limitations on production by restricting the rate of flow of oil and natural gas wells below actual production capacity in order to conserve supplies of oil and natural gas. There are federal, state and local laws and regulations primarily relating to protection of human health and the environment applicable to the development, production, handling, storage, transportation and disposal of oil and natural gas, by-products thereof and other substances and materials produced or used in connection with oil and natural gas operations. In addition, the Company may be liable for environmental damages caused by previous owners of property it purchases or leases. As a result, the Company may incur substantial liabilities to third parties or governmental entities. The Company is also subject to changing and extensive tax laws, the effects of which cannot be predicted. The implementation of new, or the modification of existing, laws or regulations could have a material adverse effect on the Company's business. RISKS RELATED TO THE VESSEL THE DESIGNATION OF THE VESSEL AS AN `ISRAELI VESSEL' COULD INCREASE THE COST OF OPERATING THE VESSEL AND MAY POTENTIALLY REDUCE THE INCOME FROM LEASING THE VESSEL. In January 2005, Israeli authorities advised Naphtha Israel Petroleum Corp. that in their view the Vessel qualified as an Israeli vessel (notwithstanding its foreign registration and ownership) as Naphtha holds 49.8% of the issued and outstanding shares of the Company. Consequently, the authorities contend that certain Israeli maritime rules and regulations govern the Vessel and its operations. These rules impose certain requirements as to operation of the vessel and require among other things that the vessel be staffed by Israeli crew, satisfy certain security requirements and allow for the mobilization of the Vessel by the Israeli authorities during periods of war or hostilities. In February 2005 Naphtha applied to the Israeli high court for a declaratory order that the Vessel is not an Israeli vessel. In the event that the Israeli court declines to grant Naphtha's application, the operating costs of the Vessel will increase and result in a reduction of potential charter (lease) opportunities for exploitation of the Vessel. In March 2005, Naphtha was advised that under a 'bareboat charter' the authorities will not deem the vessel to be an Israeli vessel. As of the filing of the annual report on Form 10-K, the Company cannot determine the outcome of the matter. A POTENTIAL LOSS OF BUSINESS DUE TO COMPETITORS THROUGHOUT THE VACATION MARKET. The Company faces significant competition from other cruise lines, in terms of the types of ships and services. Additionally, oceanline cruises are only one of many alternatives for people choosing a vacation. Therefore risk losing potential lessors of the Vessel due to competition form other cruise lines and also due to other vacation operators that provide other travel and leisure options, including hotels, resorts and package holidays and tours. Any failure to lease the Vessel for a significant period of time may adversely affect Company's results of operations and financial condition. THE POLITICAL AND ECONOMIC CLIMATE AND OTHER WORLD EVENTS AFFECTING SAFETY AND SECURITY COULD ADVERSELY AFFECT THE DEMAND FOR CRUISES AND COULD HARM THE FUTURE LEASING AND PROFITABILITY. Demand for cruises and other vacation options has been, and is expected to continue to be, affected by the public's attitude towards the safety of travel, the international political climate and the political climate of destination countries. Events such as the terrorist attacks in the U.S. on September 11, 2001 and the instability in much of the Mediterranean region (the region in which our Vessel operates) and the threats of attacks in the Mediterranean and elsewhere, concerns of an -13-
10-K14th Page of 54TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 14th
outbreak of additional hostilities, national government travel advisories, the resulting political instability and concerns over safety and security aspects of traveling, have had a significant adverse impact on demand and pricing in the travel and vacation industry and may continue to do so in the future. Demand for cruises is also likely to be increasingly dependent on the underlying economic strength of the countries from which cruise companies source their passengers. Economic or political changes that reduce disposable income or consumer confidence in the countries may affect demand for vacations, including cruise vacations, which are a discretionary purchase. Decreases in demand could adversely affect our ability to lease the Vessel and negatively affect profitability. ACCIDENTS AND OTHER INCIDENTS OR ADVERSE PUBLICITY CONCERNING THE CRUISE INDUSTRY AND COULD AFFECT COMPANY'S REPUTATION AND HARM FUTURE LEASING AND PROFITABILITY. The operation of cruise ships involves the risk of accidents, passenger and crew illnesses, mechanical failures and other incidents at sea or while in port, which may bring into question passenger safety, health, security and vacation satisfaction and thereby adversely effect future industry performance, sales and profitability. It is possible that these factors could adversely affect our leasing ability or existing charter, which would have an adverse affect on profitability. In addition, adverse publicity concerning the vacation industry in general or the cruise industry or us in particular could affect our reputation and impact demand and, consequently, have an adverse affect on our profitability. NEW REGULATIONS OF HEALTH, SAFETY, SECURITY, ENVIRONMENTAL AND OTHER REGULATORY ISSUES COULD INCREASE COMPANY'S OPERATING COSTS AND ADVERSELY AFFECT NET INCOME. The Company are subject to various international, national, state and local health, safety and security laws, regulations and treaties. We believe that health, safety, security and other regulatory issues will continue to be areas of focus by relevant government authorities. Resulting legislation or regulations, or changes in existing legislation or regulations, could impact Company's operations and would likely subject to increasing compliance costs in the future. PROBLEMS ENCOUNTERED AT PORTS COULD REDUCE COMPANY'S PROFITABILITY. Industrial actions and insolvency or financial problems of the ports where The Vessel is docked could adversely affect Company's profitability. RISKS RELATED TO OPERATIONS GENERALLY THE COMPANY IS SUBJECT TO RISKS ASSOCIATED WITH OPERATIONS IN ISRAEL. The Company is involved in oil and gas exploration activities in Israel as operator of certain offshore licenses or otherwise. The Company also purchased significant non-oil and gas real-estate properties in Israel. The Company also maintains a significant presence within Israel. Accordingly, a significant portion of the Company's business is directly affected by prevailing economic, military and political conditions that affect Israel. Any major hostilities involving Israel might have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, financial condition or results of operations. THE COMPANY'S STOCK PRICE IS VOLATILE AND COULD CONTINUE TO BE VOLATILE. Investor interest in the Company's common stock may not lead to the development of an active or liquid trading market. The market price of the Company's common stock has fluctuated in the past and is likely to continue to be volatile and subject to wide fluctuations. In addition, the stock market has experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations. The stock prices and trading volumes for the Company's stock has fluctuated widely and may continue to so for reasons that may be unrelated to business or results of operations. General economic, market and political conditions could also materially and adversely affect the market price of the Company's common stock and investors may be unable to resell their shares of common stock at or above their purchase price. PENNY STOCK REGULATIONS ARE APPLICABLE TO INVESTMENT IN SHARES OF THE COMPANY'S COMMON STOCK. Broker-dealer practices in connection with transactions in "penny stocks" are regulated by certain penny stock rules -14-
10-K15th Page of 54TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 15th
adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission. Penny stocks generally are equity securities with a price of less than $5.00 (other than securities registered on certain national securities exchanges or quoted on the Nasdaq system, provided that current prices and volume information with respect to transactions in such securities are provided by the exchange or system). The penny stock rules require a broker-dealer, prior to a transaction in a penny stock not otherwise exempt from the rules, to deliver a standardized risk disclosure document that provides information about penny stocks and the risks in the penny stock market. The broker-dealer also must provide the customer with current bid and offer quotations for the penny stock, the compensation of the broker-dealer and its salesperson in the transaction, and monthly account statements showing the market value of each penny stock held in the customer's account. In addition, the penny stock rules generally require that prior to a transaction in a penny stock the broker-dealer make a special written determination that the penny stock is a suitable investment for the purchaser and receive the purchaser's written agreement to the transaction. These disclosure requirements may have the effect of reducing the level of trading activity in the secondary market for a stock that becomes subject to the penny stock rules. Many brokers will not deal with penny stocks; this restricts the market. ITEM 2. PROPERTIES The Company maintains offices in Houston, Texas. The Company has a lease for office premises (approximately 2,015 square feet) at 11767 Katy Freeway, Houston, TX 77079 expiring in October 2006 with a monthly rental of $2,508. The Company anticipates that it will be able to extend the lease, or find replacement premises, on commercially reasonable terms. The Company also leases office space in Israel from Naphtha at 8 Granit St., Petach Tikva, Israel. In 2004, the Company paid Naphtha an aggregate of $226,000 for rental space, office services, secretarial services and computer services. The Company believes that the payment for the above services are reasonable compared to other similar locations. ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDING From time to time, the Company is involved in disputes and other legal actions arising in the ordinary course of business. In management's opinion, none of these other disputes and legal actions is expected to have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial position or results of operations. RECENT DEVELOPMENT On February 10, 2004, the Company initiated a lawsuit in the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, against several named defendants (collectively, the "Defendants"), alleging breach of contract and tort claims in connection with an agreement between the Company and the Defendants to jointly purchase and develop certain parcels of real estate outside Los Angeles. In its lawsuit, the Company is seeking damages in excess of $50 million. In March 2005, the Defendants filed motion for summery judgment in favor of the Defendants on the ground that there is no triable issue of any material fact and Defendants are entitled to judgment as a matter of law. A hearing date to consider the motion has been set for May 25, 2005. ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS During the fourth quarter of the fiscal year covered by this report, no matter was submitted to a vote of security holders of the Company. PART II ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS The number of record holders of the Company's Common Stock on March 30, 2005 was approximately 456, not including an undetermined number of persons who hold their stock in street name. Our common stock is listed on the Nasdaq Smallcap Market under the symbol "ISRL". The following table sets forth for the periods indicated, the reported high and low closing prices for our common stock. -15-
10-K16th Page of 54TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 16th
Common Stock Quarter Ended High Low 2004 March 31 $7.59 $7.01 June 30 $6.50 $6.40 September 30 $6.08 $6.08 December 31 $5.28 $5.24 2003 March 31 $4.43 $2.35 June 30 $4.60 $2.78 September 30 $4.60 $3.66 December 31 $7.74 $3.95 The Company has not declared or paid any cash dividends on its Common Stock. The Company does not anticipate paying any cash dividends on its Common Stock in the foreseeable future. The Company intends to retain all earnings for use in its business operations and in expansion. (ii) The following table sets forth certain required information relating to the shares of Common Stock issuable on an aggregated basis under the Company's 1993 Stock Option Plan. [Enlarge/Download Table] EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION Plan Category Number of Weighted- Number of securities to average securities be issued exercise price of remaining upon outstanding available for exercise of options, future outstanding issuance. options, Equity compensation plans approved by security holders 29,750 $21.00 20,250 Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders 139,990 $ 4.28 -- ---------- -------- -------- Total 169,740 $ 7.21 20,250 ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA (CONSOLIDATED) The data presented below with respect to the Company should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated -16-
10-K17th Page of 54TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 17th
Financial Statements and related Notes thereto of the Company included elsewhere in this Report and Item 7-- "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations." (in Thousands) [Enlarge/Download Table] 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 Operator's fees $137 $753 $249 $234 $1,265 Oil and Gas Sales $3,137 $3,439 $2,423 $3,068 $2,080 Revenue from vessel $2,034 Interest income $729 $760 $738 $541 $1,277 Office services to related parties and other $772 $939 $913 $857 $1,018 Equity in earnings (losses) of investees $1,365 $1,098 $(440) $(177) $106 Gain from sale of oil and gas properties and equipment -- -- $4 $6 Capital Gain -- $549 -- -- -- Gain (Loss) on marketable securities $240 $872 $(189) $(199) $(9) Other $492 $475 $49 $-- $-- Gain on BG Transaction -- -- -- $-- $3,626 Impairment of oil & gas properties $268 $617 -- $-- $2,550 Impairment of Investment -- -- -- $-- $400 Exploration costs -- $165 $1,747 $204 $2,956 Lease operating expenses and severance Taxes $1,149 $872 $844 $905 $630 Depreciation, depletion and Amortization $1,334 $621 $642 $564 $443 Operator expense $807 $795 $791 $696 $634 General and administrative expenses $1,717 $2,012 $1,422 $2,048 $1,740 Interest Expense $168 $52 $210 $-- $55 Accretion Expense $5 $43 -- -- -- Income tax expense (benefit) $1,589 $1,188 $114 $50 $(356) Net Income (loss) before cumulative effect $(20) $2,520 $(1,799) $(139) $317 Cumulative effect of change in accounting principles -- $(264) $3,516 -- -- Basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share for: Net income (loss) before cumulative effect $ (0.00) $0.95 $(0.68) $(0.05) $0.12 Cumulative effect of accounting change, net -- $(0.10) 1.33 -- -- Net income (loss) $ (0.00) $0.85 $ 0.65 $(0.05) $0.12 Weighted average number of Common shares outstanding - basic 2,639,853 2,639,853 2,639,853 2,639,853 2,639,853 Weighted average number of Common shares outstanding - diluted 2,639,853 2,639,853 2,639,853 2,639,853 2,706,731 December 31, 2004 2003 2002 2001 Balance Sheet Data Total assets $41,358 $32,614 $28,667 $26,615 Total liabilities $10,842 $2,733 $2,175 $1,160 Shareholders' equity $30,516 $29,881 $26,492 $25,455 ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTARY SHOULD BE READ IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND RELATED NOTES CONTAINED ELSEWHERE IN THIS FORM 10-K. THE DISCUSSION CONTAINS FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS THAT INVOLVE RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES. THESE STATEMENTS RELATE TO FUTURE EVENTS OR OUR FUTURE FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE. IN SOME CASES, YOU CAN IDENTIFY THESE FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS BY TERMINOLOGY SUCH AS "MAY," "WILL," "SHOULD," "EXPECT," "PLAN," "ANTICIPATE," "BELIEVE," "ESTIMATE," "PREDICT," "POTENTIAL," "INTEND," OR "CONTINUE," AND SIMILAR EXPRESSIONS. THESE STATEMENTS ARE ONLY PREDICTIONS. OUR ACTUAL RESULTS MAY DIFFER MATERIALLY FROM THOSE ANTICIPATED IN THESE FORWARD-LOOKING -17-
10-K18th Page of 54TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 18th
STATEMENTS AS A RESULT OF A VARIETY OF FACTORS, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THOSE SET FORTH UNDER "RISK FACTORS" AND ELSEWHERE IN THIS FORM 10-K. OVERVIEW Isramco, Inc., a Delaware company, is active in the exploration of oil and gas in Israel and the United States. The Company acts as an operator of certain leases and licenses and also holds participation interests in certain other interests. The Company also holds certain non-oil and gas properties discussed below. CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES In response to the Securities and Exchange Commission's Release No. 33-8040 "Cautionary Advice Regarding Disclosure And Critical Accounting Policies", the Company identified the accounting principles which it believes are most critical to the reported financial status by considering accounting policies that involve the most complex of subjective decisions or assessment. The Company's consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of these financial statements requires the Company's management to make estimates, judgments and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses. The Company continually evaluates the accounting policies and estimates it uses to prepare the consolidated financial statements. The Company bases its estimates on historical experience and assumptions believed to be reasonable under current facts and circumstances. Actual amounts and results could differ from these estimates made by management. Evaluations of oil and gas reserves are important to the effective management of the Company. They are integral to making investment decisions about oil and gas properties such as whether development should proceed or enhanced recovery methods should be undertaken. Oil and gas reserve quantities are also used as the basis of calculating the unit-of-production rates for depreciation and evaluating for impairment. Oil and gas reserves are divided between proved and unproved reserves. Proved reserves are the estimated quantities of crude oil, natural gas and natural gas liquids that geological and engineering data demonstrate with reasonable certainty to be recoverable in future years from known reservoirs under existing economic and operating conditions; i.e., prices and costs as of the date the estimate is made. Unproved reserves are those with less than reasonable certainty of recoverability and are classified as either probable or possible. The estimation of proved reserves, which is based on the requirement of reasonable certainty, is an ongoing process based on rigorous technical evaluations and extrapolations of well information such as flow rates and reservoir pressure declines. Although the Corporation is reasonably certain that proved reserves will be produced, the timing and amount recovered can be affected by a number of factors including completion of development projects, reservoir performance, regulatory approvals and significant changes in long-term oil and gas price levels. The calculation of unit-of-production depreciation is a critical accounting estimate that measures the depreciation of upstream assets. It is the ratio of (1) actual volumes produced to (2) total proved developed reserves (those proved reserves recoverable through existing wells with existing equipment and operating methods) applied to the (3) asset cost. The volumes produced and asset cost are known and, while proved developed reserves have a high probability of recoverability, they are based on estimates that are subject to some variability. Our cruise line operation is capital intensive. At December 31, 2004, we have approximately $8,590,000 of net investment in the vessel recorded on our balance sheet. We depreciate our assets on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives. The estimates of the useful lives are based on the nature of the assets as well as our current operating strategy. Future events, such as property expansions, new competition and new regulations, could result in a change in the manner in which we are using certain assets requiring a change in the estimated useful lives of such assets. In assessing the recoverability of the carrying value of property and equipment, we must make assumptions regarding estimated future cash flows and other factors. If these estimates or the related assumptions change in the future, we may be required to record impairment charges for these assets. The Company maintains allowances for doubtful accounts for estimated losses resulting from the inability of customers to make required payments. If the financial condition of customers were to deteriorate, resulting in an impairment of their ability to make payments, additional allowances may be required. The Company records an investment impairment charge when it believes an investment has experienced a decline in value that is other than is temporary. Future adverse changes in market conditions or poor operating results of underlying investments could result in losses or an inability to recover the carrying value of the investment that may not be reflected in an investment's current carrying value, thereby possibly requiring an impairment charge in the future. The Company records a valuation allowance to reduce its deferred tax assets to the amount that is more likely than not to be realized. While the Company has considered future taxable income and ongoing prudent and feasible tax planning strategies in assessing the need for the valuation allowance, in the event that the Company were to determine that it would be able to realize its deferred tax assets in the future in excess of its net recorded amount, an adjustment to the deferred tax asset would increase net income in the period such determination was made. The Company does not participate in, nor has it created, any off-balance sheet special purpose entities or other off-balance sheet financing. In addition, the Company does not enter into any derivative financial instruments. The Company records a liability for asset retirement obligation at fair value in the period in which it is incurred and a corresponding increase in the carrying amount of the related long live assets. LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES The Company finances its operations primarily from cash generated by operations. The Company's operating activities provided net cash of $1,573,000, $1,288,000 and $1,372,000 for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively. The availability of cash generated by operations could be affected by other business risks discussed in the "Risk Factors" section of this annual report. Working capital (current assets minus current liabilities) was $7,009,000 and $6,645,000 at December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively. The increase in working capital is primarily attributable to increase of the value of marketable securities. Net cash used in investing activities in fiscal 2004 was $8,195,000 compared to $476,000 in fiscal 2003. The -18-
10-K19th Page of 54TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 19th
increase in net cash used in investing activities is primarily attributable to the purchase in March 2004 and maintenance, repairs and renovation of the Vessel ($9,028,000) and the outlays associated with the drilling of wells in Texas and Oklahoma ($1,096,000), offset by the increase in the value of marketable securities. The cash used in investing activities in 2003 was primarily attributable to purchase of oil and gas properties. Capital expenditures for property and equipment were $10,126,000 and $674,000 in fiscal 2004 and 2003, respectively. Capital expenditures in 2004 were primarily attributable to purchase the cruise line vessel. RESULTS OF OPERATIONS YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2004 COMPARED TO YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2003. The company reported net loss of $20,000 (loss of 0.00 per share) in 2004 compared to a net income of $2,256,000 (net income of $0.85 per share) in 2003. The decrease in the net income in 2004 compared to 2003 is primarily attributable to: (i) a decrease in operators fee collected during 2004 (ii) decrease in oil and gas sales due to decline in gas production, (iii) decrease in the gain on marketable securities and (iv) increase of deferred tax liability. Set forth below is a break-down of these results. United States Oil and Gas Volume and Revenues (in thousands) 2004 2003 Oil Volume Sold (Bbl) 18 19 Gas Volume Sold (MCF) 470 600 Oil Sales ($) 678 542 Gas Sales ($) 2,524 2,897 Average Unit Price Oil ($/Bbl) * 38.12 28.09 Gas ($/MCF) ** 5.38 4.82 * Bbl - Barrel Equivalent to 42 U.S. Gallons ** MCF - 1,000 Cubic Feet THE OFFSHORE LICENSES (ISRAEL) The Company did not expend any amount in respect of the offshore licenses compare to $27,000 in 2003. OIL AND GAS EXPLORATION COSTS During 2004 the Company did not expand any amounts in respect of oil and gas exploration, as compared to $165,000 in 2003. OPERATOR'S FEES In 2004 the Company earned $137,000 in operator fees compared to $753,000 in 2003. The decrease in operator fees is due to the decrease in oil and gas exploration activity in 2004 compared to 2003 in which the Company drilled the Nir 2 well offshore Israel. OIL AND GAS REVENUES In 2004 and 2003 the Company had oil and gas revenues of $3,173,000 and $3,439,000, respectively. The decrease is due mainly to the decline of gas production in 2004. -19-
10-K20th Page of 54TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 20th
LEASE OPERATING EXPENSES AND SEVERANCE TAXES Lease operating expenses and severance taxes were incurred primarily in connection with oil and gas fields in the United States. Oil and gas lease operating expenses and severance taxes were $1,149,000 and $872,000 for 2004 and 2003, respectively. The relatively higher amounts in 2004 in lease operating expenses and severance taxes is primarily due to the workovers performed in connection with producing wells in 2004. INTEREST AND DIVIDEND INCOME Interest income during the year ended December 31, 2004 was $729,000 compared to $760,000 for the year ended December 31, 2003. The income is primarily attributable to interest receivable on marketable securities (Debentures). GAIN ON MARKETABLE SECURITIES In 2004, the Company recognized net realized and unrealized gains on marketable securities of $240,000 compared to net realized and unrealized gains on marketable securities of $872,000 in 2003. Increases or decreases in the gains and losses from marketable securities are dependent on the market prices in general and the composition of the portfolio of the Company. OPERATOR EXPENSES In 2004 the Company expended $807,000 in respect of operator expenses compared to $795,000 in 2003. GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES In 2004, the Company incurred $1,705,000 as general and administrative expenses compared to $2,012,000 incurred in 2003. The relatively higher amount in 2003 is primarily attributable to bonuses awarded to senior officers and increase in legal and other professional fees paid by the Company. EQUITY IN NET INCOME OF INVESTEE The Company's equity in the net income of Investee for 2004 was $1,365,000 compared to its equity in net income of $1,098,000 for 2003. The increase is primarily attributable to the increase in the marketable value of the marketable securities hold by Isramco Negev 2 and I.O.C Dead Sea LP, affiliates of the Company. CRUISE LINE VESSEL INCOME AND EXPENSES Income from the leasing of the cruise line vessel for 2004 (July through October 2004) were $2,034,000. The associated expenses in 2004 were $1,926,000 and are primarily attributable to insurance, maintenance, repair upkeep and payroll. Additionally, deprectiation expenses of $438,000 for the vessel was recorded in 2004. DEPRECIATION, DEPLETION AND AMORTIZATION Depreciation depletion and amortization expenses are connected to the producing wells in the United States and to the Cruise line vessel. During 2004, the Company recorded $1,334,000 compared to $621,000 in 2003. The increase in 2004 compared to 2003 is attributable to depreciation of the Vessel ($438,000) and increase of $315,000 in the depreciation of the wells in the United Stated due to the decline in production of the gas wells. During 2004 and 2003, the Company recorded impairment charges of $268,000 and $617,000 respectively relating to oil and gas assets. OTHER INCOME Other Income in 2004 was $492,000 compared to $475,000 in 2003. Other Income is primarily attributable to -20-
10-K21st Page of 54TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 21st
monthly income of $7,000 related to lease of the real estate in Israel and $369,000 related to a change of estimate for asset retirement obligations. Other Income in the year 2003 included the sum of $350,000 which represents the settlement of a liability recorded in connection which a well drilled in Marine 9 permit offshore Congo, and was recorded during 2002 as exploration costs. YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2003 COMPARED TO YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2002. The Company reported net income before cumulative effect of $2,520,000 (income of $0.95 per share) in 2003 compared to a net loss before cumulative effect of $1,799,000 (loss of $0.68 per share) in 2002. The increase in the net income is primarily attributable to an increase in oil and gas price in 2003 and due to the gain in marketable securities and net income of investees. Set forth below is a break-down of these results. United States Oil and Gas Volume and Revenues (in thousands) 2003 2002 Oil Volume Sold (Bbl) 19 21 Gas Volume Sold (MCF) 600 720 Oil Sales ($) 542 470 Gas Sales ($) 2,897 1,953 Average Unit Price Oil ($/Bbl) * 28.09 22.54 Gas ($/MCF) ** 4.82 2.71 * Bbl - Barrel Equivalent to 42 U.S. Gallons ** MCF - 1,000 Cubic Feet THE OFFSHORE LICENSES (ISRAEL) In each of 2003 and 2002, the Company expended approximately $88,243 and $27,000, respectively, in respect of the Offshore Licenses. OIL AND GAS EXPLORATION COSTS The Company expended in 2003 approximately $165,000 in oil and gas exploration costs as compared to approximately $1,747,000 expended in 2002. The exploration cost in 2003 attributable to the investment in Tilapia (Congo) and in respect of the Israeli offshore wells (Nir 2 and Nir 2). The oil and gas exploration costs in 2002 are primarily attributable to the unsuccessful drilling of the Read well in Texas and the unsuccessful drilling in the Marine 9 permit (the Congo). OPERATOR'S FEES In 2003 the Company earned $753,000 in operator fee compared to $249,000 in 2002. The increase is due to the drilling of Nir 2 well. -21-
10-K22nd Page of 54TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 22nd
OIL AND GAS REVENUES In 2003 and 2002 the Company had oil and gas revenues of $3,439,000 and $2,423,000, respectively. The increase is due mainly to the increase in the oil and gas price during 2003. LEASE OPERATING EXPENSES AND SEVERANCE TAXES Lease operating expenses and severance taxes were incurred primarily in connection with oil and gas fields in the United States. Oil and gas lease operating expenses and severance taxes were $872,000 and $844,000 for 2003 and 2002, respectively. INTEREST AND DIVIDEND INCOME Interest income during the year ended December 31, 2003 was $760,000 compared to 738,000 for the year ended December 31, 2002. The increase in interest income is primarily attributable to interest receivable on marketable securities (Debentures). GAIN ON MARKETABLE SECURITIES In 2003, the Company recognized net realized and unrealized gain on marketable securities of $872,000 compared to net realized and unrealized losses on marketable securities of $189,000 in 2002. Increases or decreases in the gains and losses from marketable securities are dependent on the market prices in general and the composition of the portfolio of the Company. OPERATOR EXPENSES In 2003 the Company expended $795,000 in respect of the operator expenses compare to $791,000 in 2002. GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES In 2003, the Company incurred $2,012,000 as general and administrative expenses compared to $1,422,000 incurred in 2001. The relatively higher amount in 2002 is primarily attributable to bonuses awarded to senior officers and increase in legal fees. CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS The Company leases office facilities in Texas and in Israel and certain equipment pursuant to non-cancelable operating lease agreements. Future minimum lease payments pursuant to these leases as of December 31, 2004 were as follows (in thousands). [Download Table] TOTAL 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Thereafter ----- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---------- Operating Leases: Texas: 83,000 28,000 29,000 26,000 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS In January 2003, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 46, Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, and subsequently revised the Interpretation in December 2003 (FIN 46R). This Interpretation of Accounting Research Bulletin No. 51, Consolidated Financial Statements, addresses consolidation by business enterprises of variable interest entities, which have certain characteristics. As revised, FIN 46R is now generally effective for financial statements for interim or annual periods ending on or after March 15, 2004. We have no identified any variable interest entities. In the event a -22-
10-K23rd Page of 54TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 23rd
variable interest entity is identified, we do not expect the requirements of FIN 46R to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements. In May 2003, the FASB issued SFAS No. 150, "Accounting for Certain Instruments with Characteristics of Both Liabilities and Equity," ("SFAS 150") which establishes standards for how an issuer classifies and measures certain financial instruments with characteristics of both liabilities and equity. SFAS 150 requires that an issuer classify a financial instrument that is within its scope, which may have previously been reported as equity, as a liability (or an asset in some circumstances). This statement is effective for financial instruments entered into or modified after May 31, 2003, and otherwise is effective at the beginning of the first interim period beginning after June 15, 2003 for public companies. The adoption of SFAS No 150 did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements. In July 2003, an issue was bought before the Financial Accounting Standards Board regarding whether or not contract-based oil and gas mineral rights held by lease or contact ("mineral rights") should be recorded or disclosed as intangible assets. The issue presents a view that these mineral rights are classified assets as defined in SFAS No. 141, "Business Combinations," and therefore, should be classified separately on the balance sheet as intangible assets. SFAS No. 141 and SFAS No. 142, "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets," became effective for transactions subsequent to June 30, 2001, with the disclosure requirements of SFAS No. 142 required as of January 1, 2002. SFAS No. 141 requires that all business combinations initiated after June 30, 2001 be accounted for using the purchase method and that intangible assets be disaggregated and reported separately from goodwill SFAS No. 142 established new accounting guidelines for both finite lived intangible assets and indefinite lived intangible assets. Under the statement, intangible assets should be separately reported on the face of the balance sheet and accompanied by disclosure in the notes to financial statements. SFAS No. 142 does not apply to accounting utilized by the oil and gas industry as prescribed by SFAS No. 19, and is silent about whether at not its disclosure provisions apply to oil and gas mineral rights to an upcoming agenda, which may result in a change in how Isramco classifies these assets. ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK The Company is exposed to market risk, including adverse changes in commodity prices. The Company produces and sells natural gas and crude oil. As a result, the Company's financial results can be significantly affected if these commodity prices fluctuate widely in response to changing market forces. ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA The information called for by this Item 8 is included following the "Index to Financial Statements" contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE On January 13, 2005, the audit committee of the board of directors (the "Audit Committee") of the Company accepted the resignation of UHY - Mann Frankfort Stein & Lipp CPAS, LLP ("UHY LLP") (formerly - Mann Frankfort Stein & Lipp CPAS, L.L.P.) as the Company's independent accountants. Concurrent with UHY LLP's resignation, the Audit Committee appointed Malone & Bailey, PC (the "New Accountants") as the independent accounting firm to audit the financial statements of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2004. The reports by UHY LLP with respect to the Company's financial statements for each of the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2003 did not contain any adverse opinion or disclaimer of opinion and were not qualified or modified as to uncertainty, audit scope or accounting principles. During the fiscal years ended December 31, 2002 and -23-
10-K24th Page of 54TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 24th
2003 and during the subsequent interim period, there were no disagreements between the Company and UHY LLP on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure or auditing scope or procedure, which, if not resolved to the satisfaction of UHY LLP, would have caused it to make reference to the subject matter of thereof in connection with its reports. During the fiscal years ended December 31, 2002 and 2003, and through the date of their resignation, UHY LLP did not advise the Company with respect to any matters described in paragraphs (a)(1)(v)(A) through (D) of Item 304 of Regulation S-K. During the fiscal years ended December 31, 2002 and 2003, and through the date of their engagement, the Company did not consult with the New Accountants regarding either (i) the application of accounting principles to a specified transaction, either completed or proposed; (ii) the type of audit opinion that might be rendered on the Company's financial statements; (iii) any matter that was either the subject of disagreement (as defined in Item 304(a)(1)(iv) of Regulation S-K) or a reportable event (as defined in Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K). The Company has provided UHY LLP with a copy of the foregoing disclosure. Attached as an exhibit hereto is a copy of UHY LLP's letter, dated January 13, 2005, in response to the foregoing disclosure. ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES EVALUATION OF DISCLOSURE CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES. The Company maintains disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the Company's Exchange Act reports is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC's rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure based closely on the definition of "disclosure controls and procedures" in Rule 13a-14(c). As of the end of the period covered by this report, we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with participation of management, including our Chief Executive Officer (and our Principal Financial Officer), of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures. Based on the foregoing, our Chief Executive Officer (and Principal Financial Officer) concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective. CHANGES IN INTERNAL CONTROLS OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING. During the quarter ended December 31, 2004, there have been no changes in our internal controls over financial reporting that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, these controls. ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION On March 24, 2005, the Company issued 38,919 shares of Common Stock, of the Company to each of Haim Tsuff, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Jackob Maimon, President of the Company. The shares were issued upon the exercise of options to purchase 69,995 shares of Common Stock at an exercise price of $4.28 per share granted to each of Mr. Tsuff and Mr. Maimon on March 24, 2000. The options were exercised pursuant to "cashless" exercise provisions under which each holder received a lesser number of shares based on the difference between the closing bid price of the common stock on the trading day immediately preceding the exercise of the options and the specified exercise price. The Company did not receive any cash proceeds from that exercise. The shares were issued in a transaction not involving a public offering and were issued without registration under Section 5 of the Securities act of 1933, as amended (the "Act"), in reliance upon the exemption from registration afforded by Section 4(2) of the Act and Regulation D promulgated thereunder. PART III The information called for by items 10, 11, 12 13 and 14 will be contained in the Company's definitive proxy statement which the Company intends to file within 120 days after the end of the Company's fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 and such information is incorporated herein by reference. GLOSSARY "Grant Agreement" shall mean the agreement between the Company and the Government of Israel pursuant to which the Government of Israel has provided assistance to the Company in connection with its investment in the Negev 2 Venture by providing a grant of 44.34(cent) for each U.S. dollar ($1.00) invested and expended by the Company in oil and gas activities in Israel within the framework of the Negev 2 Venture. The Government financing provided for under the Grant is repayable only from funds emanating from commercial production in any payout area and then, only to the extent of 30% of the recipient's share of the net revenue from said payout area, as and when received. The Grant Agreement entitles the Government of Israel, to receive a 12.5% royalty on oil sales, as well as an overriding royalty of 6.5% of the Company's share in the petroleum produced and saved after payout. If there is no commercial discovery of oil, the Company will not be required to repay the grant monies. A grant agreement was also entered into between the Government of Israel and HEI, Donesco, L.P.S. and Mazal Oil. "Joint Operating Agreement" shall mean the Joint Operating Agreement of the Negev 2 Venture which was signed as of the 30th day of June, 1988, between the participants in the Negev 2 Venture, as amended or as shall be amended from time to time. -24-
10-K25th Page of 54TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 25th
"Joint Venture Agreement" shall mean the Joint Venture Agreement of the Negev 2 Venture which was signed as of the 30th of June, 1988 between the participants in the Negev 2 Venture, as amended from time to time. "Limited Partnership" shall mean Isramco-Negev 2 Limited Partnership, a Limited Partnership founded pursuant to a Limited Partnership Agreement made on the 2nd and 3rd days of March, 1989 (as amended on September 7, 1989, July 28, 1991, March 5, 1992 and June 11, 1992) between the Trustee on part as Limited Partner and Isramco Oil and Gas Ltd., as General Partner on the other part. "Limited Partnership Agreement" shall mean the Limited Partnership Agreement made the 2nd and 3rd days of March, 1989 (as amended September 7, 1989, July 28, 1991, March 5, 1992 and June 11, 1992), between Isramco Oil and Gas Ltd., as General Partner, and Isramco Management (1988) Ltd. as the Limited Partner. "Negev 2 Venture Agreements" shall mean the Joint Venture Agreement, the Joint Operating Agreement, the Voting Agreement and every agreement into which the parties to said agreements have entered, in connection with the Negev 2 Venture. "Overriding Royalty Interest" shall mean a percentage interest over and above the base royalty and is free of all costs of exploration and production, which costs are borne by the Grantor of the Overriding Royalty Interest and which is related to a particular Petroleum License. "Payout" shall mean the defined point at which one party has recovered its prior costs. "Petroleum" shall mean any petroleum fluid, whether liquid or gaseous, and includes oil, natural gas, natural gasoline, condensates and related fluid hydrocarbons, and also asphalt and other solid petroleum hydrocarbons when dissolved in and producible with fluid petroleum. "Petroleum Exploration" shall mean test drilling; any other operation or search for petroleum, including geological, geophysical, geochemical and similar investigations and tests; and, drilling solely for obtaining geological information. "Petroleum Production" shall mean the production of petroleum from a petroleum field and all operations incidental thereto, including handling and treatment thereof and conveyance thereof to tankers, a pipe line or a refinery in or in the vicinity of the field. "Preliminary Permit", "Preferential Right to Obtain a License", "License" shall have the meaning(s) set forth in the Petroleum Law of Israel. "Trust Agreement" shall mean the Trust Agreement made on the 3rd day of March, 1989 (as amended September 7, 1989, July 28, 1991, March 5, 1992 and June 11, 1992) for the Trust Company of Kesselman and Kesselman. "Working Interest" shall mean an interest in a Petroleum Asset granting the holder thereof the right to participate pro rata in exploiting the Petroleum Asset for petroleum exploration, development and petroleum production, subject to its pro rata participation in the expenses involved therein after acquiring the Working Interest. "Israel Petroleum Law" The Company's business in Israel is subject to regulation by the State of Israel pursuant to the Petroleum Law, 1952. The administration and implementation of the Petroleum Law is vested in the Minister of National Infrastructure (the "Minister") and an Advisory Council. The following includes brief statements of certain provisions of the Petroleum Law in effect at the date of this Prospectus. Reference is made to the copy of the Petroleum Law filed as an exhibit to the Registration Statement referred to under "Additional Information" and the description which follows is qualified in its entirety by such reference. The holder of a preliminary permit is entitled to carry out petroleum exploration, but not test drilling or petroleum production, within the permit areas. The Commissioner determines the term of a preliminary permit and it may not exceed eighteen (18) months. The Minister may grant the holder a priority right to receive licenses in the permit areas, and for the duration of such priority right no other party will be granted a license or lease in such areas. Drilling for petroleum is permitted pursuant to a license issued by the Commissioner. The term of a license is for three (3) years, subject to extension under certain circumstances for an additional period up to four (4) years. A license holder is required to commence test drilling within two (2) years from the grant of a license (or earlier if required by the terms of the license) and not to interrupt operations between test drillings for more than four (4) months. If any well drilled by the Company is determined to be a -25-
10-K26th Page of 54TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 26th
commercial discovery prior to expiration of the license, the Company will be entitled to receive a Petroleum Lease granting it the exclusive right to explore for and produce petroleum in the lease area. The term of a lease is for thirty (30) years, subject to renewal for an additional term of twenty (20) years. The Company, as a lessee, will be required to pay the State of Israel the royalty prescribed by the Petroleum Law which is presently, and at all times since 1952 has been, 12.5% of the petroleum produced from the leased area and saved, excluding the quantity of petroleum used in operating the leased area. The Minister may require a lessee to supply at the market price such quantity of petroleum as, in the Minister's opinion, is required for domestic consumption, subject to certain limitations. As a lessee, the Company will also be required to commence drilling of a development well within six (6) months from the date on which the lease is granted and, thereafter, with due diligence to define the petroleum field, develop the leased area, produce petroleum therefore and seek markets for and market such petroleum. ITEM 15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K (a) Exhibits 3.1 Articles of Incorporation of Registrant with all amendments filed as an Exhibit to the S-l Registration Statement, File No. 2-83574. 3.2 Amendment to Certificate of Incorporation filed March 17, 1993, filed as an Exhibit with the S-l Registration Statement, File No. 33-57482. 3.3 By-laws of Registrant with all amendments, filed as an Exhibit to the S-l Registration Statement, File No. 2-83570. 10.1 Oil Marketing Agreement, filed as Exhibit with the S-l Registration Statement, File No. 2-83574. 10.2 Joint Venture Agreement and Joint Operating Agreement dated June 30, 1988 by and among HEI Oil and Gas Limited Partnership, JOEL - Jerusalem Oil Exploration Ltd., Delek Oil Exploration Ltd., Delek, The Israel Fuel Corporation Ltd., the Company, Southern Shipping and Energy (U.K.), Naphtha, Israel Petroleum Company Ltd., Oil Exploration of Pat Ltd., LPS Israel Oil Inc., Donesco Venture Fund One, a Limited Partnership and Mazaloil Inc. filed as an Exhibit to Form 8-K for the month of September 1988. 10.3 Grant Agreement with the Government of Israel, undated, between the Company and the Government of Israel on behalf of the State of Israel, filed as an Exhibit to Form 10-Q for the Company for the period ending September 30, 1988 and incorporated herein by reference. 10.4 Translated from Hebrew, Indemnity Agreement between the Company and Isramco Management (1988) Ltd. dated March _, 1989, filed as an Exhibit to Form 8-K for the month of March 1989 and incorporated herein by reference. 10.5 Amendment Agreement to Grant Agreement between the Company and the Government of Israel, filed as an Exhibit to this Post-effective Amendment No. 8 to Form S-l Registration Statement. File No. 2- 83574. 10.6 Translated from Hebrew, Limited Partnership Agreement between Isramco Oil and Gas Ltd. and Isramco Management (1988) Ltd. dated March 2, 1989, filed as an Exhibit to Form 8-K for the month of March 1989 and incorporated herein by reference. 10.7 Translated from Hebrew, Trust Agreement between Isramco Management (1988) Ltd. and Kesselman and Kesselman dated March 3, 1989, filed as an Exhibit to Form 8-K for the month of March 1989 and incorporated herein by reference. 10.8 Translated from Hebrew, Indemnity Agreement between the Company and Isramco Management (1988) Ltd. dated March _, 1989, filed as an Exhibit to Form 8-K for the month of March 1989 and incorporated herein by reference. 10.9 Equalization of Rights Agreement between Isramco-Negev 2 Limited Partnership and Delek Oil Exploration Ltd. and Delek - The Israel Fuel Corporation Ltd, filed as an Exhibit to Form 8-K for the month of January 1993 dated January 21, 1993 and incorporated herein by reference. 10.10 Option Agreement between Isramco Resources Inc. and Delek Oil Exploration Ltd. and Delek - The Israel Fuel Corporation Ltd. filed as an Exhibit to Form 8-K for the month of January 1993 dated January 21, 1993 and incorporated herein by reference. 10.11 Agreement by and among Naphtha Congo Ltd., Equital Ltd. and the Company dated September 4, 1997, filed as an Exhibit to Form 8-K for the month of September, 1997 and incorporated herein by reference. 10.12 Amendment to Consulting Agreement between Goodrich Global L.T.D. B.V.I. and the Company dated -26-
10-K27th Page of 54TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 27th
December _, 1997, filed as an Exhibit to Form 8-K for the month of December, 1997 and incorporated herein by reference. 10.13 Consulting Agreement between Romulas Investment Ltd. and the Company dated August _, 1997, filed as an Exhibit to Form 8-K for the month of September, 1997 and incorporated herein by reference, assigned by Romulas Investment Ltd. on December 31, 1997 to Remarkable Holdings Ltd. 10.14 Inventory Services Management Agreement dated December 1997 between the Company and Equital Ltd. filed herewith as Exhibit 10.70. 10.15 Consulting Agreement dated as of November 1, 1999 between the Company and Worldtech, Inc. 10.16 Agreement dated June 12, 2002 between the Company and Mati Properties and Construction Ltd. and Boaz Avrahami, filed as an Exhibit to the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2002. 14.1 Code of Ethics, filed as an Exhibit to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003. 31 Certification of Chief Executive and Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act * 32 Certification of Chief Executive and Principal Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley act of 2002. * 99.1 Financial Statements of Isramco Negev 2 Limited Partnership as of December 31, 2004 * * Attached hereto as an exhibit (b) Reports on Form 8-K The Company filed a current report on Form 8-K on November 19, 2004 reporting its financials results for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 (c) Financial Statements -27-
10-K28th Page of 54TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 28th
SIGNATURES In accordance with Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized. /S/ HAIM TSUFF HAIM TSUFF, CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD, CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER Date: March 30, 2005 In accordance with the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in the capacities and on the dates indicated. Signature Title Date /s/ Jackob Maimon President, Director March 30, 2005 Jackob Maimon /s/ Amir Eskandari Director March 30, 2005 Amir Eskandari /s/ Max Pridgeon Director March 30, 2005 Max Pridgeon /s/ Donald D. Lovell Director March 30, 2005 Donald D. Lovell -28-
10-K29th Page of 54TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 29th
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Page ---- Independent Auditors' Reports F-1,2 Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2004 and 2003 F-3 Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 F-4 Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders' Equity for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 F-5 Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 F-6 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements F-7 (i) -29-
10-K30th Page of 54TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 30th
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM To the Board of Directors Isramco, Inc. and Subsidiaries Houston, Texas We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Isramco, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2004, and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders' equity, and cash flows for the year then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of Isramco, Inc's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audit in accordance with standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Isramco, Inc., as of December 31, 2004, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the period described in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. MALONE & BAILEY, PC www.malone-bailey.com Houston, Texas March 15, 2005 F-1
10-K31st Page of 54TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 31st
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM To the Shareholders and Board of Directors of Isramco, Inc. and Subsidiaries We have audited the consolidated balance sheet of Isramco, Inc. and subsidiaries (the "Company") as of December 31, 2003, and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in shareholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2003. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We did not audit the financial statements of Isramco Oil and Gas, Ltd.; Isramco B.V., Cruquius; or Isramco, Inc. - Israel Branch, which are wholly owned subsidiaries whose combined statements reflect total assets of $ 11,249,799 as of December 31, 2003 , and total revenues of $ 3,422,000 for the year then ended. Those statements were audited by other auditors whose reports have been furnished to us, and our opinion, insofar as it relates to the amounts included for these subsidiaries, is based solely on the reports of the other auditors. We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards of Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits and reports of the other auditors provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, based on our audits and the reports of other auditors, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Isramco, Inc. and subsidiaries at December 31, 2003 and the consolidated results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2003 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. As discussed in Note A, the Company adopted the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 143 "Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations" as of January 1, 2003. Also discussed in Note A, the Company adopted the provisions of Atatement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 142 "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets in 2002". /s/ UHY MANN FRANKFORT STEIN & LIPP CPAS, LLP ----------------------------------------------- (FORMERLY MANN FRANKFORT STEIN & LIPP CPAS, LLP) HOUSTON, TEXAS MARCH 5, 2004 F-2
10-K32nd Page of 54TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 32nd
[Enlarge/Download Table] ISRAMCO INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (in thousands except for share information) DECEMBER 31 --------------------------- 2004 2003 ------------ ------------ ASSETS CURRENT ASSETS Cash and cash equivalents $ 2,087 $ 2,429 Marketable securities, at market 6,203 4,064 Accounts receivable - Trade 776 503 Account receivable - other --- 609 Prepaid FIT expenses --- 407 Prepaid expenses and other current assets 193 197 ------------ ------------ TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS 9,260 8,209 Property and equipment, net (successful efforts method for oil and gas properties) 3,190 3,264 Real Estate 1,887 1,887 Marketable securities, at market 6,225 8,572 Investment in affiliates 12,044 10,520 Investment in Vessel 8,590 -- Other 162 162 ------------ ------------ TOTAL ASSETS $ 41,358 $ 32,614 ============ ============ LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY CURRENT LIABILITIES Accounts payable and accrued expenses $ 1,261 $ 798 Credit from Banks 676 -- Bank Loan 733 -- ------------ ------------ TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES 2,670 798 ------------ ------------ LONG-TERM LIABILITIES Asset retirement obligations 314 766 Deferred tax obligation 2,989 1,169 Current portion of long-term bank Loan 4,869 -- ------------ ------------ TOTAL LONG-TERM LIABILITIES 8,172 1,935 ------------ ------------ TOTAL LIABILITIES 10,842 2,733 ------------ ------------ SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY Common stock $0.0l par value; authorized 7,500,000 shares; 27 27 issued 2,669,120 shares; outstanding 2,639,853 shares Additional paid-in capital 26,240 26,240 Retained earnings (accumulated deficit) 3,169 3,189 Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) 1,244 589 Treasury stock, 29,267 shares at cost (164) (164) ------------ ------------ Total shareholders' equity 30,516 29,881 ------------ ------------ Total liabilities and shareholders' equity $ 41,358 $ 32,614 See notes to the consolidated financial statements. F-3
10-K33rd Page of 54TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 33rd
[Enlarge/Download Table] ISRAMCO INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (in thousands except for share information) YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, ------------------------------------------- 2004 2003 2002 ----------- ----------- ----------- Revenues and other income : Operator fees from related party $137 $ 753 $249 Oil and gas sales 3,173 3,439 2,423 Revenue from Vessel 2,034 --- --- Interest income 729 760 738 Office services To related parties 592 635 773 To others 180 304 140 Capital gain --- 549 --- Gain on marketable securities 240 872 --- Equity in net income of investees 1,365 1,098 --- Other 492 475 49 ----------- ----------- ----------- Total revenues and other income 8,943 8,885 4,372 ----------- ----------- ----------- Expenses : Interest expense 168 52 210 Cost of Revenue 1,926 --- --- Accretion expense 5 43 --- Depreciation, depletion and amortization 1,334 621 642 Lease operation expense and severance taxes 1,149 872 844 Exploration costs --- 165 1,747 Operator expense 807 795 791 General and administrative To related parties 358 317 120 To others 1,359 1,695 1,302 Loss on sale of marketable securities --- --- 189 Equity in net loss of investees --- --- 440 Impairment of oil and gas assets 268 617 --- ----------- ----------- ----------- Total expenses 7,374 5,177 6,285 ----------- ----------- ----------- Income (loss) before income taxes 1,569 3,708 (1,913) Income (taxes) benefit (1,589) (1,188) 114 ----------- ----------- ----------- Net income (loss) before cumulative effect (20) 2,520 (1,799) Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle, net -- (264) 3,516 ----------- ----------- ----------- Net income (loss) $ (20) $ 2,256 $1,717 =========== =========== =========== Earnings (loss) per share Basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share for: Net income (loss) before cumulative effect $ 0.00 $0.95 $(0.68) Cumulative effect of accounting change, net -- $ (0.10) $ 1.33 ----------- ----------- ----------- Net income (loss) $ 0.00 $ 0.85 $ 0.65 =========== =========== =========== Weighted average number of shares outstanding-basic 2,639,853 2,639,853 2,639,853 =========== =========== =========== Weighted average number of shares outstanding -diluted 2,639,853 2,639,853 2,639,853 =========== =========== =========== See notes to the consolidated financial statements. F-4
10-K34th Page of 54TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 34th
[Enlarge/Download Table] ISRAMCO INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2004, 2003 AND 2002 COMMON STOCK --------------------- ACCUMULATED RETAINED ADDITIONAL OTHER EARNINGS TOTAL NUMBER PAID-IN COMPREHENSIVE (ACCUMULATED TREASURY SHAREHOLDERS' OF SHARES AMOUNT CAPITAL INCOME (LOSS) DEFICIT) STOCK EQUITY ----------- ------- --------- ------------- ------------ -------- ------------- $ IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE AMOUNTS ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Balances at December 31, 2001 2,669,120 $27 $26,240 $136 $(784) $(164) $25,455 Comprehensive income: Net Income - - - - 1,717 - 1,717 Net unrealized loss on available for sale marketable securities, net of taxes - - - (243) - - (243) Net Realized gain (loss) on foreign exchange rate, net of faxes (437) (437) ----------- ------- --------- ------------- ------------ -------- ------------- Total comprehensive income 1,037 ------------- Balances at December 31, 2002 2,669,120 $27 $26,240 $(544) $ 933 $(164) $26,492 Comprehensive income: Net Income 2,256 2,256 Net unrealized gain on available for sale marketable securities, net of taxes - - - 524 - - 524 Net realized gain (loss) on foreign exchange rate, net of taxes 609 609 ----------- ------- --------- ------------- ------------ -------- ------------- Total comprehensive income 3,389 ------------- Balances at December 31, 2003 2,669,120 $27 $26,240 $589 $3,189 $(164) $29,881 Net Loss (20) (20) Net unrealized gain on available for sale marketable securities, net of taxes - - 504 - 504 Net realized gain (loss) on foreign exchange rate, net of taxes 151 151 ----------- ------- --------- ------------- ------------ -------- ------------- Total Comprehensive income 635 ------------- Balances at December 31, 2004 2,669,120 $27 $26,240 $1,244 $3,169 $(164) $30,516 =========== ======= ========= ============= ============ ======== ============= F-5
10-K35th Page of 54TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 35th
[Enlarge/Download Table] ISRAMCO INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (in thousands) YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, ---------------------------------------------- 2004 2003 2002 ------------ ------------ ------------ CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: Net income (loss) $ (20) $ 2,256 $ 1,717 Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to cash provided by operating activities: Depreciation, depletion, amortization and provision for impairment 1,140 1,238 642 Accretion of asset retirement obligation 5 43 - Dry hole costs - 99 1,642 Loss (gain) on marketable securities (336) (872) 189 Gain from sale of securities - (549) - Equity in net loss (income) of investees (1,366) (1,098) 440 Cumulative effect of an accounting change - 264 (3,516) Deferred taxes 1,783 1,532 195 Changes in assets and liabilities: Accounts receivables (272) 53 (103) Prepaid expenses and other current assets 157 (163) (329) Accounts payable and accrued expenses 462 (1,377) 1,015 Marketable securities trading - (138) (519) ------------ ------------ ------------ Net cash provided by operating activities 1,573 1,288 1,372 ------------ ------------ ------------ CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: Purchase of property and equipment (1,098) (676) (1,617) Investment in Vessel (9,028) Proceeds from sale of oil and gas properties and equipment 14 - 10 Purchase of real estate - - (1,887) Purchase of marketable securities (4,807) (3,070) (491) Proceeds from sale of marketable securities 6,115 3,270 - Proceeds from sale of other investment 609 - - ------------ ------------ ------------ Net cash used in investing activities (8,195) (476) (4,035) ------------ ------------ ------------ CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: Receipt of loans from banks 9,800 - - Payments on short-term debt (4,800) - - Change in short-term credit from banks 1,277 - - ------------ ------------ ------------ Net cash provided by financing activities 6,277 - - ------------ ------------ ------------ NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS (342) 812 (2,663) CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT BEGINNING OF YEAR 2,429 1,617 4,280 ------------ ------------ ------------ CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF YEAR $ 2,087 $ 2,429 $ 1,617 ============ ============ ============ SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION: CASH PAID DURING THE PERIOD FOR INTEREST $ - $ - $ - ============ ============ ============ CASH PAID DURING THE PERIOD FOR TAXES $ - $ - $ - ============ ============ ============ See notes to the consolidated financial statements. F-6
10-K36th Page of 54TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 36th
ISRAMCO INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (NOTE A) -- General and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies: [1] The Company Isramco Inc. and subsidiaries (the Company) is primarily engaged in the acquisition, exploration, operation and development of oil and gas properties. As of December 31, 2004, the Company has oil and gas interest in Texas, Louisiana, Oklahoma, Wyoming, New Mexico, and approximately a 0.5% working interest in various properties located in Israel. In addition, the company purchased real estate in Israel in 2002. In March 2004, the Company purchased a luxury cruise liner which it continues to hold title to through a wholly owned subsidiary. [2] Consolidation The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company, its direct wholly-owned subsidiaries, Jay Petroleum, L.L.C., (Jay), Jay Management L.L.C (Jay Management), IsramTec Inc. (IsramTec) and a wholly-owned foreign subsidiary, Isramco Oil and Gas and Magic 1 Cruise Line Corp. Intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. [3] Method of Accounting for Oil and Gas Operations The Company follows the "successful efforts" method of accounting for its oil and gas properties. Under this method of accounting, all property acquisition costs and costs of exploratory and development wells are capitalized when incurred, pending determination of whether the well has found proved reserves. If an exploratory well has not found proved reserves, the costs of the well are charged to expense. The costs of development wells are capitalized whether successful or unsuccessful. Geological and geophysical costs and the costs of carrying and retaining undeveloped properties are expensed as incurred. Management estimates that the salvage value of lease and well equipment will approximately offset the future liability for plugging and abandonment of the related wells. Accordingly, no accrual for such costs has been recorded. In July 2003, an issue was brought before the Financial Accounting Standards Board regarding whether or not contract-based oil and gas mineral rights held by lease or contract ("mineral rights") should be recorded or disclosed as intangible assets. The issue presents a view that these mineral rights are intangible assets as defined in SFAS No. 141, "Business Combinations," and therefore, should be classified separately on the balance sheet as intangible assets. SFAS No. 141 and SFAS No. 142, "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets," became effective for transactions subsequent to June 30, 2001, with the disclosure requirements of SFAS No. 142 required as of January 1, 2002. SFAS No. 141 requires that all business combinations initiated after June 30, 2001 be accounted for using the purchase method and that intangible assets be disaggregated and reported separately from goodwill. SFAS No. 142 established new accounting guidelines for both finite lived intangible assets and indefinite lived tangible assets. Under the statement, intangible assets should be separately reported on the face of the balance sheet and accompanied by disclosure in the notes to financial statements. SFAS No. 142 does not apply to accounting utilized by the oil and gas industry as prescribed by SFAS No. 19, and is silent about whether or not its disclosure provisions apply to oil and gas companies. The Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) has added the treatment of oil and gas mineral rights to an upcoming agenda, which may result in a change in how Isramco classifies theses assets. Beginning in 2003 in accordance with SFAS 143, the Company has recorded an asset retirement obligation in connection with the plugging and abandonment of its oil and gas properties. The fair value of the liability is added to the carrying amount of the associated asset and this additional carrying amount is depreciated over the life of the asset. [4] Marketable Securities Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 115 (SFAS No. 115), Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities, requires the Company to classify its debt and equity securities in one of three categories: trading, available-for-sale and held-to-maturity. Trading securities are bought and held principally for the purposes of selling them in the near term. Held-to-maturity securities are those securities in which the Company has both the ability and intent to hold the security until maturity. All other securities not included in trading or held-to-maturity are classified as available-for-sale. Trading and available-for-sale securities are recorded at fair market value. The Company holds no held-to-maturity securities. Unrealized holding gains and losses on trading securities are included in earnings. Unrealized holding gains or losses, net of the related tax effects, on available-for-sale securities are excluded from earnings and are reported net of applicable taxes as accumulated other comprehensive income, a separate component of shareholders' equity, until realized. F-7
10-K37th Page of 54TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 37th
[5] Investment in Affiliates The Company accounts for its investments in affiliate entities in which it has the ability to exercise significant influence over operating and financial policies using the equity method. [6] Equipment Equipment, consisting of motor vehicles, office furniture and equipment, is carried at cost less accumulated depreciation, computed on the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets. [7] Translation of Foreign Currencies Foreign currency is translated in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 52, which provides the criteria for determining the functional currency for entities operating in foreign countries. The Company has determined its functional currency is the United States (U.S.) dollar since all of its contracts are in U.S. dollars. The financial statements of Oil and Gas and the Israel branch have been re-measured into U.S. dollars as follows: at rates prevailing during the year for revenue and expense items (except depreciation); at year-end rates for assets and liabilities except for fixed assets and prepaid expenses which are translated at the rate in effect at the time of their acquisition. Depreciation is re-measured based on the historical dollar cost of the underlying assets. The net effects of currency translations were not material in any period. [8] Earnings Per Share (EPS) The Company follows SFAS No. 128, Earnings per Share, for computing and presenting earnings per share, which requires, among other things, dual presentation of basic and diluted loss per share on the face of the statement of operations. Basic EPS is computed by dividing income available to common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted EPS reflects the potential dilution that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue common shares were exercised or converted into common shares or resulted in the issuance of common shares that then shared in the earnings of the entity. For the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2001 the Company's stock options were anti-dilutive. [9] Cash Equivalents Cash equivalents include short-term investments with original maturities of ninety days or less and are not limited in their use. [10] Non-compete Agreements Non-compete agreements are amortized over the period to be benefited, generally from three to five years. [11] Use of Estimates The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and related notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Oil and gas reserve quantities are the basis for the calculation of depreciation, depletion and impairment of oil and gas properties. An independent petroleum-engineering firm determines the Company's reserve estimates. However, management emphasizes that reserve estimates are inherently imprecise and that estimates of more recent discoveries and non-producing reserves are more imprecise than those for properties with long production histories. At December 31, 2004, approximately 16.6% of the Company's oil and gas reserves were attributable to non-producing reserves. Accordingly, the Company's estimates are expected to change as future information becomes available. As mandated under SFAS No. 144, "Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets" (SFAS No. 144), the Company is required under certain circumstances to evaluate the possible impairment of the carrying value of its long-lived assets. For proved oil and gas properties, this involves a comparison to the estimated future undiscounted cash flows, as described in the paragraph below. In addition to the uncertainties inherent in the reserve estimation process, these amounts are affected by management's estimates for projected prices for oil and natural gas, which have typically been volatile. It is reasonably possible that the Company's oil and gas reserve estimates may materially change in the forthcoming year. [12] Impairment of Long-Lived Assets The Company adopted SFAS No. 144, as from January 1, 2002. This Statement requires that long-lived assets be reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to undiscounted future F-8
10-K38th Page of 54TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 38th
cash flows expected to be generated by the asset or used in its disposal. If the carrying amount of an asset exceeds its estimated undiscounted future cash flows, an impairment charge is recognized equal to the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the fair market value of the asset. Assets to be disposed of are reported at the lower of the carrying amount or fair value less costs to sell. During 2004, the Company reported impairment charge of $50,000 relating to its proved properties. During 2003 the company recorded impairment charge of $248,000 relating to its proved properties and $81,000 related to the retirement obligation assets. Unproved oil and gas properties that are individually significant are periodically assessed for impairment value, and a loss is recognized to the extent, if any, that the cost of the property has been impaired. During 2004 and 2003, the Company recorded an impairment of $218,000 and $288,000 respectively relating to its unproved properties. There were no such impairments recognized in 2002. [13] Income Taxes The Company accounts for income taxes using the asset and liability method as prescribed by SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on differences between the financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities, and are measured using the enacted tax rates and laws that will be in effect when the differences are expected to reverse. The measurement of deferred tax assets is reduced, if necessary, by a valuation allowance for any tax benefits which, are not expected to be realized. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in the period that such tax rate changes are enacted. [14] Oil and Gas Revenues The Company records oil and gas revenues following the entitlement method of accounting for production, in which any excess amount received above the Company's share is treated as a liability. If less than the Company's share is received, the underproduction is recorded as an asset. The Company's imbalance position was not significant in terms of volumes or values at December 2004 and 2003. [15] Environmental The Company is subject to extensive federal, state, local and foreign environmental laws and regulations. These laws, which are constantly changing, regulate the discharge of materials into the environment and may require the Company to remove or mitigate the environmental effects of the disposal or release of petroleum or chemical substances at various sites. Liabilities for expenditures of no capital nature are recorded when environmental assessment and/or remediation is probable, and the costs can be reasonably estimated. No significant amounts for environmental liabilities are recorded at December 31, 2004 and 2003. [16] Stock-Based Compensation SFAS No. 123, "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation," encourages, but does not require, companies to record compensation cost for stock-based employee compensation plans at fair value. In December 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 148, to provide alternative methods of transition for a voluntary change to the fair value based method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation. The statement also amends the disclosure requirements of SFAS No. 123 to require prominent disclosures in both annual and interim financial statements about the method of accounting for stock-based compensation and the effect of the method used on reported results. The Company has chosen to continue to account for stock-based compensation issued to employees using the intrinsic value method prescribed in Accounting Principles Board (APB) Opinion No. 25, "Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees," and related interpretations. Accordingly, compensation cost for stock options is measured as the excess, if any, of the quoted market price of the Company's stock at the date of the grant over the amount an employee must pay to acquire the stock. The fair value of options is calculated using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. Had the Company adopted the fair value method of accounting for stock based compensation, compensation expense would have been higher, and net loss and net loss attributable to common shareholders would have increased for the periods presented. No change in cash flows would occur. The effects of applying SFAS No. 123 in this pro forma disclosure are not indicative of future amounts. F-9
10-K39th Page of 54TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 39th
[Enlarge/Download Table] Year Ended December 31, (in thousands) ------------------------------------ 2004 2003 2002 ---------- ---------- ---------- Net income (loss) reported.................................. $ (20) $2,256 $1,717 Deduct: Total stock based employee compensation expense determined under fair value based method for all awards, net of related income tax.................. -- -- -- Pro forma net (loss)........................................ (20) 2,256 1,717 Net Loss Per Share.......................................... Basic-as reported......................................... $(0.00) $ .85 $ .65 Basic-pro forma........................................... (0.00) .85 .65 Diluted-as reported....................................... (0.00) .85 .65 Diluted-pro forma......................................... (0.00) .85 .65 [17] Accounting Changes Effective January 1, 2003, the Company adopted SFAS No. 143 "Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations" and recognized a loss of $264,000 that is included as a cumulative effect of change in accounting principle. Effective January 1, 2002, the Company applied the provisions of Statement SFAS No.142 "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets". In 2002, the Company performed the transitional impairment evaluation as provided in the said standard. Accordingly, the Company recognized for the year ended December 31, 2003 a gain in the amount of $3,516,000 from a negative goodwill that is included as a cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle. [18] Reclassifications Certain amounts in prior financial statements have been realassed to conform to the 2004 financial statements presentation. [19] New Pronouncements In January 2003, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 46, Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, and subsequently revised the Interpretation in December 2003 (FIN 46R). This Interpretation of Accounting Research Bulletin No. 51, Consolidated Financial Statements, addresses consolidation by business enterprises of variable interest entities, which have certain characteristics. As revised, FIN 46R is now generally effective for financial statements for interim or annual periods ending on or after March 15, 2004. We have no identified any variable interest entities. In the event a variable interest entity is identified, we do not expect the requirements of FIN 46R to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements In May 2003, the FSAB issued SFAS No. 150, "Accounting for Certain Instruments with Characteristics of Both Liabilities and Equity," ("SFAS 150") which establishes standards for how an issuer classifies and measures certain financial instruments with characteristics of both liabilities and equity. SFAS 150 requires that an issuer classify a financial instrument that is within its scope, which may have previously been reported as equity, as a liability (or an asset in some circumstances), This statement is effective for financial instruments entered into or modified after May 31, 2003, and otherwise is effective at the beginning of the first interim period beginning after June 15, 2003 for public companies. The adoption of SFAS No 150 did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements. In April 2003, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued SFAS No. 149, "Amendment of Statement 133 on Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities." The statement amends and clarifies accounting and reporting for derivative instruments, including certain derivative instruments embedded in other contracts, and hedging activities. This statement is designed to improve financial reporting such that contracts with comparable characteristics are accounted for similarly. The statement, which is generally effective for contracts entered into or modified after June 30, 2003, is not anticipated to have a significant effect on the Company's financial position or results of operations. In May 2003, the FASB issued SFAS No. 150, "Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of Both Liabilities and Equity." This statement establishes standards for how an issuer classifies and measures certain financial instruments with characteristics of both liabilities and equity. This statement is effective for financial instruments entered into or modified after F-10
10-K40th Page of 54TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 40th
May 31, 2003, and is otherwise effective at the beginning of the first interim period beginning after June 15, 2003. The Company currently has no such financial instruments outstanding or under consideration and therefore adoption of this standard currently has no financial reporting implications. In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123R, "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation." SFAS No. 123R establishes standards for the accounting for transactions in which an entity exchanges its equity instruments for goods or services. This Statement focuses primarily on accounting for transactions in which an entity obtains employee services in share-based payment transactions. SFAS No. 123R requires that the fair value of such equity instruments be recognized as expense in the historical financial statements as services are performed. Prior to SFAS No. 123R, only certain pro forma disclosures of fair value were required. SFAS No. 123R shall be effective for small business issuers as of the beginning of the first interim or annual reporting period that begins after December 15, 2005. The adoption of this new accounting pronouncement is not expected to have a material impact on the financial statements of the Company during the calendar year 2006. (NOTE B) - Transactions with Affiliates and Related Parties The Company acts as operator for joint venture with related parties in Israel engaged in the exploration of oil and gas for which it receives operating fees equal to the larger of 6% of the actual direct costs or minimum monthly fees of $6,000. Operator fees earned and related operator expenses are as follows: YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, ---------------------------------------------------- 2004 2003 2002 $ IN THOUSANDS $ IN THOUSANDS $ IN THOUSANDS ---------------- ---------------- ---------------- Operator fees: Nir 2 $ -- $ 559 $ -- Med Ashdod Lease -- 56 55 GAL C 72 -- 27 Marine North -- -- 23 Marine Center -- 66 72 Marine South 65 72 72 ---------------- ---------------- ---------------- $ 137 $ 753 $ 249 ================ ================ ================ Operator expenses $ 807 $ 795 $ 791 ================ ================ ================ In August 1997 the Company entered into a Consulting Agreement with Romulas Investment Ltd. (which Agreement has been assigned to Remarkable Holdings Ltd.), a company which is wholly owned and controlled by Daniel Avner, the Vice President of the Company. Pursuant to this Agreement, the Company agreed to pay the Consultant the sum of $7,500 per month plus expenses. In February 1999, the Consulting Agreement was amended to increase the monthly compensation payable thereunder to $15,000 and pursuant to the amendment, the reimbursement of expenses was disallowed. The Consulting Agreement was extended until July 2004. On December 9, 2003, following the resignations of Daniel Avner from his position as Vice President, the Consulting Agreement was terminated. On December 9, 2003, the company entered into a Consulting Agreement with Doron Avraham, the new Vice President of the Company. Pursuant to this Agreement the Company agreed to pay the Consultant the sum of $15,000 per month, in addition to reimbursement all business expenses. The Consulting Agreement is currently in effect through November 2007. The Company paid Naphtha 226,000, $197,000 and $192,000 for the year ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively for of rent, office, secretarial and computer services. A subsidiary of the Company is the general partner of Isramco-Negev 2 Limited Partnership from which it received management fees and expense reimbursements of $480,000 for each of the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002. In May of 1996 the Company entered into a Consulting Agreement with Goodrich Global L.T.D. B.V.I., a company owned and controlled by Haim Tsuff, the Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation. Pursuant to this Consulting Agreement, the Company pays $144,000 per annum in installments of $12,000 per month, in addition to reimbursing all reasonable business expenses incurred during the term in connection with the performance of services on behalf of the Company. In April 1997 the consulting compensation was increase to $240,000 per annum in installment of $20,000 per month. The Consulting Agreement is currently in effect through May 31, 2006. In the event that the Company terminates the services provided by Mr. Tsuff, he will be entitled to receive a lump sum severance payment equal to the balance of the unpaid consulting fee due for the remaining F-11
10-K41st Page of 54TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 41st
term of the agreement. In November of 1999 the Company entered into a Consulting Agreement with Worldtech Inc., a Mauritus company of which Jackob Maimon, the President of the Company, is a director. Pursuant to this Consulting Agreement, which is currently in effect through May 31, 2006, the Company agreed to pay the sum of $240,000 per annum in installments of $20,000 per month, in addition to reimbursing all reasonable business expenses incurred during the term in connection with the performance of services on behalf of the Company. In the event that the Company terminates the services provided by Mr. Maimon, he shall be entitled to receive a lump sum severance payment equal to the balance of the unpaid consulting fee due for the remaining term of the agreement. In December 2003 the Company awarded bonuses of $125,000 to its Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the board of directors and $125,000 to its President. In December 2004 the Company awarded bonuses of $150,000 to its Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the board of directors. In December 2004, the Company leased real estate to I.O.C. Israel Oil Company pursuant to a two year lease at a monthly rental of $7,000. On January 1, 2001 the Company retained the services of I.O.C. Israel Oil Company LTD in connection with the operation of Jay Petroleum LLC and Jay Management Company LLC (wholly owned subsidiaries of the Company). The Company paid I.O.C. $120,000 for each of the years 2002, 2003 and 2004 and has agreed to pay this amount during 2005. (NOTE C) - Investments in Affiliate A wholly owned subsidiary of the Company is the General Partner in the Isramco Negev 2 Limited Partnership. The daily management of the Limited Partnership vests with the General Partner, however, matters involving the rights of the Limited Partnership unit holders are subject to supervision of the Supervisor, appointed to supervise the Limited Partnership activities, and in some instances the approval of the Limited Partnership unit holders. The Company's General Partner's interest in the Limited Partnership is 0.05% which is accounted for by the equity method of accounting due to its ability to exercise significant influence. At December 31, 2004 and 2003, the Company owned 282,817,359 units (6.65% of the issued Partnership units) of the Isramco Negev 2 Limited Partnership with a cost of $4,050,000. This investment is also accounted for under the equity method of accounting. Summarized financial information of Isramco Negev 2 Limited Partnership is as follows (amounts in thousands) (unaudited): AS OF DECEMBER 31, ---------------------------- Balance Sheet 2004 2003 ------------ ------------ Current Assets $128,016 $114,900 Other Assets 2,908 1,700 ------------ ------------ Total Assets 130,924 $116,500 ============ ============ Current Liabilities 129 $ 100 Equity 130,795 $116,940 ------------ ------------ Total liabilities and equity $130,924 $117,040 ============ ============ Year Ended December 31, -------------------------------------------- Statement of Operations 2004 2003 2002 ------------ ------------ ------------ Income $ 13,080 $ 19,700 $ 1,000 Expenses $ (807) $ (8,500) (3,000) ------------ ------------ ------------ Net income (loss) $ 12,273 $ 11,200 $ (2,000) ============ ============ ============ At December 31, 2004 and 2003 the Company also owned 7,877,248 units (24.97% of the issued Partnership units) of the F-12
10-K42nd Page of 54TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 42nd
I.N.O.C Dead Sea Limited Partnership with a cost of $1,270,000 This investment is also accounted for under the equity method of accounting. Summarized financial information of I.N.O.C. Dead Sea Limited Partnership is as follows (amount in thousand - unaudited): AS OF DECEMBER 31, ---------------------------- Balance Sheet 2004 2003 ------------ ------------ Current Assets $ 13,752 $ 11,330 Other Assets - - ------------ ------------ Total Assets $ 13,752 $ 11,330 ============ ============ Current Liabilities $ 71 $ 60 Equity $ 13,681 $ 11,270 ------------ ------------ Total liabilities and equity $ 13,752 $ 11,330 ============ ============ Year Ended December 31, -------------------------------------------- Statement of Operations 2004 2003 2002 ------------ ------------ ------------ Income $ 2,488 $ 2,070 $ 680 Expenses $ (300) $ (1,400) (1,900) ------------ ------------ ------------ Net income (loss) $ 2,188 $ 670 $ (1,220) ============ ============ ============ (NOTE D) - Marketable Securities At December 31, 2004 and 2003, the Company had net unrealized gains (losses) on marketable securities of $148,000, $283,000. Trading securities, which are primarily traded on the Tel-Aviv Stock Exchange, consists of the following: [Enlarge/Download Table] DECEMBER 31, 2004 DECEMBER 31, 2003 ----------------- ----------------- COST MARKET VALUE COST MARKET VALUE ---- ------------ ---- ------------ Debentures and Convertible Debentures $ 2,222,000 $ 3,164,000 $2,423,000 $ 3,170,000 Equity securities 2,433,000 1,931,000 1,201,000 735,000 Investment Trust Funds 185,000 189,000 157,000 159,000 $ 4,837,000 $ 5,284,000 $3,781,000 $ 4,064,000 ----------- ----------- ---------- ----------- Available-for-sale securities, which are primarily traded on the Tel-Aviv Stock Exchange and on OTC, consist of the following [Download Table] DECEMBER 31, 2004 DECEMBER 31, 2003 ----------------- ----------------- COST MARKET VALUE COST MARKET VALUE ---- ------------ ---- ------------ $ 4,955,000 $ 6,225,000 $8,068,000 $ 8,572,000 --------- --------- ---------- ----------- Sales of marketable securities resulted in realized gains (losses) of $(32,000), $95,000 and $3,000 for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 respectively. (NOTE E) - Other assets - Investment in a high-tech company. The Company sold 203,000 shares of high tech Company, Eyblaster for $609,000 recognizing a gain of $549,000 in December 2003. F-13
10-K43rd Page of 54TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 43rd
(NOTE F) - Oil and Gas Properties and Equipment ANNUAL RATES OF DEPRECIATION ARE AS FOLLOWS: Office equipment and furniture 7%--20% Motor vehicles 15%--30% 2004 2003 ---- ---- Transportation equipment 142,000 142,000 Office equipment 100,000 133,000 ------- ------- 242,000 275,000 ------- ------- Less accumulated depreciation (170,000) (189,000) Equipment, net 72,000 86,000 ------- ------- A summary of property and equipment is as follows: 2004 2003 ---- ---- Unproved properties 1,369,000 321,000 Proved Oil and gas properties 6,054,007 6,660,000 Retirement obligation assets 226,000 449,000 Transportation equipment 142,000 142,000 Office equipment 100,000 133,000 ------- ------- 7,918,000 7,705,000 Less accumulated depletion, depreciation, amortization and provision for impairment (4,728,000) (4,441,000) --------- --------- 3,190,000 3,264,000 ========= ========= (NOTE G) Debt The Company's debt consists of the following as of December 31, 2004: [Enlarge/Download Table] Line of credit from bank, interest of 3.35% $ 676,000 Bank loan, repayable in 19 equal quarterly installments (of principal and interest) over the period beginning June 20, 2005, interest rate of LIBOR + 1% per annum, due December 20, 2009 5,002,000 Bank loan, due on March 29, 2005, interest of 3.35% 600,000 ------------- Total debt 6,278,000 Less: current portion (733,000) ------------- Long term debt $ 5,545,000 ============= (NOTE H) EPS Computation SFAS No. 128, "Earnings Per Share", requires a reconciliation of the numerator (income) and denominator (shares) of the basic EPS computation to the numerator and denominator of the diluted EPS computation. The company's reconciliation is as follows: [Enlarge/Download Table] FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, ------------------------------- 2004 2003 2002 ---- ---- ---- INCOME SHARES INCOME SHARES INCOME SHARES ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ Earnings per common share-basic $ (20,000) 2,639,853 $2,256,000 2,639,853 $1,717,000 2,639,853 Effect of dilutive securities: Stock options -- -- -- -- -- -- Earnings per common share-Diluted $ (20,000) 2,639,853 $2,256,000 2,639,853 $1,717,000 2,639,853 (NOTE I) Stock Options The 1993 stock option plan (the 1993 Plan) was approved at the Annual General Meeting of Shareholders held on F-14
10-K44th Page of 54TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 44th
, August 13, 1993. At December 31, 2004, 50,000 shares of common stock are reserved under the 1993 Plan. Options granted under the 1993 Plan might be either incentive stock options under the Internal Revenue Code or options which do not qualify as incentive stock options. Options are granted for a period of up to ten years from the grant date. The exercise price for an incentive stock option may not be less than 100% of the fair market value of the Company's common stock on the date of grant. The options granted under this plan were fully vested at grant date. The administrator may set the exercise price for a nonqualified stock option. Summary of the status of the Company's stock options is presented below: WEIGHTED-AVERAGE ---------------- 1993 Plan: OPTIONS EXERCISE PRICE ------- -------------- Outstanding at December 31, 2002 29,750 $21.00 Granted -- -- Expired (24,250) -- Outstanding at December 31, 2003 5,500 10.45 Granted -- -- Expired (2,500) 16.92 Outstanding at December 31, 2004 3,000 $ 5.06 As of December 31, 2004, 3,000 options were outstanding and extensible of a price of $5.06 and a weighted average remaining contractual life of 0.5 years. During 1995 the Company granted 3,000 options to a director under the 1993 Plan exercisable through July 2005 at an exercise price of $5.06 per share. On March 24, 2000, Haim Tsuff, the Chairman of the Board of Director and Chief Executive officer of the Company and Jacob Maimon, the President of the Company were each granted five year options to purchase up to 69,995 shares of the Company's common stock at an exercise price of $4.28. No stock options were granted during 2004, 2003 and 2002 Shares of common stock reserved for future issuance are: Options granted under the 1993 Plan 3,000 Options available for grant under the 1993 Plan 20,250 Options granted to directors during 2000 139,990 ------- Total 160,240 Pursuant to requirements of SFAS No. 123, the weighted average fair market value of options granted during 2000 was $3.57 per share. The weighted average closing bid prices for the Company's stock at the date the options were granted during 2000 was $5.13 per share. The fair market value pursuant SFAS No. 123 of each option granted is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes options-pricing model. The model assumes expected volatility of 76%, risk-free interest rate of 6.51% for grants during 2000, an expected life of 5 years and no dividend yield. Actual value realized, if any, is dependant on the future performance of the Company's common stock and overall stock market conditions. There is no assurance the value realized by an optionee will be at or near the value estimated by the Black-Scholes model. (NOTE J) -- Income Taxes Income (loss) before income taxes from U.S. and foreign results of operations is as follows: YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, ----------------------- 2004 2003 2002 ---- ---- ---- U.S. $ 1,107,000 $ 1,022,000 $ (203,000) Foreign $ 462,000 $ 2,426,000 $(1,710,000) ----------- ----------- ------------ Total $ 1,569,000 $ 3,448,000 $(1,913,000) =========== =========== ============ F-15
10-K45th Page of 54TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 45th
Total income tax expense (benefit) for each of the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 were allocated as follows: [Download Table] 2004 2003 2002 ---- ---- ---- Income taxes (benefit) $1,589,000 $ 1,188,000 $ (114,000) Shareholders' equity for unrealized holding gains (losses) on marketable securities 176,000 $ 80,000 (43,000) ---------- ----------- ----------- Total 1,765,000 $ 1,268,000 $ (157,000) ========== =========== =========== Income tax expense (benefit) attributable to income from continuing operations consist of: YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, ----------------------- 2004 2003 2002 ---- ---- ---- Current: State $ 15,000 $ 17,000 $ 6,000 Federal 17,000 1,171,000 (315,000) Foreign -- -- -- Deferred federal 1,557,000 -- 195,000 ---------- ----------- ----------- Total $1,589,000 $ 1,188,000 $ (114,000) ========== =========== =========== The deferred tax assets (liabilities) as of December 31, 2004 and 2003 are as follows: [Enlarge/Download Table] AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2004 2003 ---- ---- Net unrealized depreciation (appreciation) of marketable securities $ (589,000) $ 130,000 Basis differences in property and equipment (210,000) 356,000 Losses carry forward 96,000 -- Other timing differences (2,286,000) (1,655,000) ------------ ------------ Total ($2,989,000) (1,169,000) ============ Valuation allowance -- -- ------------ ------------ ($2,989,000) $(1,169,000) Reconciliation between the actual income tax expense and income taxes computed by applying the U.S. Federal income tax rate to income before income taxes is as follows: [Download Table] YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2004 2003 2002 ---- ---- ---- Computed at U.S. statutory rates (35.0%) (35.0%) (35.0)% State income taxes, net of federal benefit (1.0%) 0.5% (3.1)% Adjustment to valuation allowance -- -- 18.9% Other (65.3%) 1.05% 13.2% (101.3%) (34.45%) (6.0)% (NOTE K) -- Concentrations of Credit Risk Financial instruments, which potentially expose the Company to concentrations of credit risk, consist primarily of trade accounts receivable. The Company's customer base includes several of the major United States oil and gas operating and production companies. Although the Company is directly affected by the well-being of the oil and gas production industry, management does not believe a significant credit risk exists at December 31, 2004. The Company maintains deposits in banks, which may exceed the amount of federal deposit insurance available. Management periodically assesses the financial condition of the institutions and believes that any possible deposit loss is minimal. A significant portion of the Company's cash and cash equivalents is invested in marketable securities. Substantially, all marketable securities owned by the Company are held by banks in Israel and Switzerland. (NOTE L) -- Luxury Cruise Liner In March 2004, the Company purchased a luxury cruise liner for aggregate consideration of $8,050,000. The vessel, a Bahamas flagged ship, contains 270 passenger cabins spread out over nine decks. In March 2004, the Company has secured commercial bank loans for approximately $7.5 million of the purchase price, F-16
10-K46th Page of 54TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 46th
secured by a lien on the vessel, marketable securities and a Company guarantee. As at December 31, 2004, approximately $5 million in principal of the bank loans remain outstanding, The loan bears interest in the rate of LIBOR+1% per annum. Title to the vessel in is Magic 1 Cruise Line Corp., a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company ("Magic").As of December 31, 2004 the company expended $1 million approximately in respect of the maintenance, repairs renovation, and upkeep of the vessel. In the Company's estimation, an additional investment of up to $0.4 million will be required for additional repairs and maintenance. The Company leased the vessel to an Israeli based tour operator for the period from July 1, 2004 through October 17, 2004 at a daily rate of $21,500. The Company granted to the tour operator a discount in the amount of $310,000 in respect of the said rental period. (NOTE M) -- Commitments and Contingencies COMMITMENTS: The Company leases corporate office facilities under a 3-year operating lease expiring October 2006 at a monthly rental of $2,400 with escalation to2,500$ on November 2005. The company is also responsible for its pro rate share of the operating expenses that exceed a certain threshold. The Company shares office space with Jay Petroleum, L.L.C. and Jay Management L.L.C., affiliates, under an informal sublease agreement. At December 31, 2004, future minimum lease payments under non-cancelable operating leases are approximately $55,000. Future annual minimum lease payments are follows: Year Ending December 31, 2005 29,000 2006 26,000 ------ 55,000 CONTINGENCIES: The Company is involved in various other legal proceedings arising in the normal course of business. In the opinion of management, the Company's ultimate liability, if any, in these pending actions would not have a material adverse effect on the financial position, operating results or liquidity of the Company. (NOTE N) - Geographical Segment Information The company's operations for 2004 involve two industry segments - the exploration, development production and transportation of oil and natural gas and holding and leasing its cruise line vessel. Prior to 2004 the Company operated in a single operating segment - oil and gas activities. Its current oil and gas activities are concentrated in the United States and Israel. Operating outside the United States subjects the company to inherent risks such as a loss of revenues, property and equipment from such hazards as exploration, nationalization, war and other political risks, risks of increase of takes and governmental royalties, renegotiation of contracts with government entities and change in laws and policies. governing operations of foreign-based companies. The Company's oil and gas business is subject to operating risks associated with the exploration, and production of oil and gas, including blowouts, pollution and acts of nature that could result in damage to oil and gas wells, production facilities of formations. In additions, oil and gas prices have fluctuated substantially in recent years as a result of events, which were outside of the Company's control. The company does not directly operate the cruise line vessel. The company leases the vessel to third party cruise line operators. This segment of the company's business is subject to many risks all of which cannot be presently anticipated, including losses resulting from unexpected repairs and maintenance and competition. F-17
10-K47th Page of 54TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 47th
[Enlarge/Download Table] GEOGRAPHIC SEGMENTS (IN THOUSANDS) -------------- UNITED TOTAL CONSOLIDATED STATES ISRAEL OIL AND GAS VESSEL TOTAL ------ ------ ----------- ------ ----- 2004 Sales and other operating revenue $ 3,368 $ 730 $ 4.098 $ 2,034 $ 6,117 Costs and operating expenses (2,309) (800) (3.109) (2,364) (5,525) -------- ------ -------- -------- -------- Operating profit (loss) 1,059 (100) 989 (331) 628 Interest income 729 Interest expenses (168) General corporate expenses (1,717) Gain on marketable securities and Net income in investee 1,605 Change estimate (369) Other income 123 Income taxes (1,589) Net loss (20) Identifiable assets at December $ 3,135 $ 59 $ 3,194 $ 8,590 $ 11,784 31, 2004 Cash and corporate assets 29,574 Total assets at December 31, 2004 41,358 GEOGRAPHIC SEGMENTS (IN THOUSANDS) -------------- UNITED CONSOLIDATED STATES ISRAEL VESSEL TOTAL ------ ------ ------ ----- 2003 Sales and other operating revenue $ 3,582 $1,549 -- $ 5,131 Costs and operating expenses (1,960) (820) (150) (2,930) -------- ------ -------- ------- Operating profit (loss) $ 1,622 $ 729 $ (150) $ 2,201 Interest income and other 760 corporate revenues Net gain in investee and gain on 1,098 marketable securities General corporate expenses (2,012) Interest expense (52) Capital gain 549 Other income 475 Accretion expenses (43) Income taxes (1,188) Net income before cumulative effect 2,256 Identifiable assets at December $ 2,987 $ 81 -- $ 3,068 31, 2003 Net property and equipment Cash and corporate assets 29,627 Total assets at December 31, 2003 32,614 F-18
10-K48th Page of 54TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 48th
[Enlarge/Download Table] GEOGRAPHIC SEGMENTS (IN THOUSANDS) -------------- CONSOLIDATED UNITED STATES ISRAEL CONGO TOTAL ------------- ------ ----- ----- 2002 Sales and other operating revenue $ 2,563 $ 1,022 $ -- $ 3,585 Costs and operating expenses (2,321) (817) (886) (4,024) ------------- ------------ ------------ ----------- Operating profit (loss) 242 205 (886) (439) Interest income and other corporate revenues 787 loss on marketable securities and net loss in investee (629) General corporate expenses (1,422) Interest expense (210) Income taxes 114 Net loss before cumulative effect (1,717) Identifiable assets at December 31, 2002 $ 3,178 $ 177 $ 150 $ 3,505 Cash and corporate assets 25,162 Total assets at December 31, 2002 28,667 (NOTE O) - Asset Retirement Obligations We recognize the fair value of a liability for an asset retirement obligation in the period in which it is incurred. The associated asset retirement costs are capitalized as part of the carrying amount of the asset. The fair value of a liability for an asset retirement obligation is the amount which that liability could be settled in a current transaction between willing parties. The Company uses the expected cash flow approach for calculating asset retirement obligations. The liability is discounted using the credit-adjusted risk-free interest rate in effect when the liability is initially recognized. The changes in the liability for an asset retirement obligation due to the passage of time are measured by applying an interest method of allocation to the amount of the liability at the beginning of the period. This amount is recognized as an increase in the carrying amount of the liability and as accretion expense classified as an operating item in the statement of operations. Effective January 1, 2003, the Company adopted SFAS No. 143, "Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations." SFAS No. 143 requires entities to record a liability for asset retirement obligations at fair value in the period in which it is incurred and a corresponding increase in the carrying amount of the related long-lived asset. As of January 1, 2003, the Company recorded asset retirement costs of $458,581 and asset retirement obligations of $650,240. The cumulative effect of change in accounting principle was $263,955 after taxes of $39,158. The reconciliation of the beginning and ending asset retirement obligations for the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003 is as follows (in thousands): 2004 2003 ---- ---- Asset retirement obligations, as of beginning of the year $766 $ -- Liabilities upon adoption of SFAS No. 143 on January 1, 2003 -- 650 Liabilities incurred 8 73 Liabilities settled -- -- Accretion expense 18 43 Revisions in estimated cash flows (478) -- ---------------- Asset retirement obligations, as of end of year $314 $766 ================ (NOTE P) - Subsequent Event F-19
10-K49th Page of 54TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 49th
Lease of Cruise Vessel. In March 2005, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company ("Magic") entered into a lease agreement (the "Bareboat Lease") with a European based tour operator (the "Operator") pursuant to which Magic will lease the cruise liner Mirage 1 (the "Vessel") to the Operator for the period from April 14, 2005 through October 31, 2005 at a daily rate of $8,000. Under the Bareboat Lease, the Operator will operate the Vessel and will solely bear all outlays associated with the operation, maintenance and upkeep of the Vessel. Contemporaneous with its entry into the Bareboat Lease the Operator entered into an agreement (the "Marketing Agreement") with a subsidiary of one of the leading transportation companies in Israel ("the "Marketing Party") pursuant to which the Operator granted to the Marketing Party the exclusive marketing of the tours on the Vessel. , and under which the Operator is entitled to minimum payments. From the Marketing Party. In connection with the Bareboat Lease, on March 9, 2005, the Company furnished a limited guarantee (the "Guarantee") to and in favor of the Marketing Party, pursuant to which the Company undertook to indemnify it in an amount not exceeding $1 million in respect of any loss or damage incurred by the Marketing Party arising out of the breach by the Operator of its obligations under the Marketing Agreement . To induce the Company to issue the Guarantee, the Operator granted to the Company a security interest on all amounts due to it under the Marketing Agreement and agreed to provide the Company with a bank guarantee in the amount of $600,000 (which will secure Chesny's obligations under the Bareboat Charter as well). ISSUANCE OF COMMON STOCK. In March 2005, the Company issued 38,819 shares of the Common Stock to each of Haim Tsuff, Chairman of the Company, and Jackob Maimon, President of the Company. The shares were issued upon the exercise of options to purchase 69,995 shares Common Stock at an exercise price of $4.28 per share granted to each of Mr. Tsuff and Mr. Maimon on March 25, 2000. The options were exercised pursuant to "cashless" exercise provisions under which the number of shares of Common Stock issued upon exercise was reduced by the number of shares, valued at the closing price of the Common Stock on the Nasdaq Small Cap Market on the trading day immediately prior to exercise, equal to the aggregate exercise price of the option. The shares were issued in a transaction not involving a public offering and were issued without registration under Section 5 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Act"), in reliance upon the exemption from registration afforded by Section 4(2) of the Act and Regulation D promulgated thereunder. F-20
10-K50th Page of 54TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 50th
SUPPLEMENTARY OIL AND GAS INFORMATION For the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 (unaudited) The following supplemental information regarding the oil and gas activities of the Company is presented pursuant to the disclosure requirements promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission and SFAS No. 69, "Disclosures About Oil and Gas Producing Activities." Capitalized costs relating to oil and gas activities and costs incurred in oil and gas property acquisition, exploration and development activities for each year are shown below. CAPITALIZED COST OF OIL AND GAS PRODUCING ACTIVITIES (IN THOUSANDS) [Enlarge/Download Table] 2004 2003 2002 ------------ ------------ ------------ UNITED STATES UNITED STATES CONGO UNITED STATES CONGO --------------- --------------- ------- --------------- ------- Unproved properties not being amortized $ -- $ -- $150 $ 194 $ 150 Proved property being amortized 7,427 6,352 -- 5,504 -- Accumulated depreciation, depletion amortization and impairment (4,316) (3,338) (150) (2,526) -- ------- ------- ----- ------- ----- Net capitalized costs $3,111 $3,014 -- $3,172 $ 150 ======= ======= ===== ======= ===== COSTS INCURRED IN OIL AND GAS PROPERTY ACQUISITION, EXPLORATION, AND DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES (IN THOUSANDS) [Enlarge/Download Table] 2004 2003 2002 ------------ ------------ ------------ UNITED STATES UNITED STATES CONGO UNITED STATES CONGO --------------- --------------- ------- --------------- ------- Property acquisition costs--proved and unproved properties $ -- $ 260 $ -- $ -- $ -- Exploration costs -- 22 54 833 887 Development costs 1,098 393 -- 500 -- (Israel exploration costs in 2004-$0; 2003-$88; 2002-$27) F-21
10-K51st Page of 54TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 51st
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS FOR OIL AND GAS PRODUCING ACTIVITIES (IN THOUSANDS) [Enlarge/Download Table] 2004 2003 2002 ------------ ------------ ------------ UNITED STATES UNITED STATES CONGO UNITED STATES CONGO --------------- --------------- ------- --------------- ------- Oil and gas sales $3,173 $3,439 $-- $2,423 $-- Lease operating expense and (1,149) (872) -- (844) -- severance taxes Depreciation, depletion, amortization and provision for impairment (1,181) (1,088) (150) (589) -- Exploration costs -- (22) (54) (833) (809) ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- Income (Loss) before tax provision 843 1,457 (204) 155 (809) Provision for income taxes -- 71 283 ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- Results of operations $843 $1,457 $(133) $155 $526 ======= ======= ======= ======= ======= OIL AND GAS RESERVES Oil and gas proved reserves cannot be measured exactly. The engineers interpreting the available data, as well as price and other economic factor base reserve estimates on many factors related to reservoir performance, which require evaluation. The reliability of these estimates at any point in time depends on both the quality and quantity of the technical and economic data, the production performance of the reservoirs as well as extensive engineering judgment. Consequently, reserve estimates are subject to revision, as additional data become available during the producing life of a reservoir. When a commercial reservoir is discovered, proven reserves are initially determined based on limited data from the first well or wells. Subsequent data may better define the extent of the reservoir and additional production performance, well tests and engineering studies will likely improve the reliability of the reserve estimate. The evolution of technology may also result in the application of improved recovery techniques such as supplemental or enhanced recovery projects, or both, which have the potential to increase reserves beyond those envisioned during the early years of a reservoir's producing life. The following table represents the Company's net interest in estimated quantities of proved developed and undeveloped reserves of crude oil, condensate, natural gas liquids and natural gas and changes in such quantities at December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, and for the years then ended. Net proved reserves are the estimated quantities of crude oil and natural gas which geological and engineering data demonstrate with reasonable certainty to be recoverable in future years from known reservoirs under existing economic and operating conditions. Proved developed reserves are proved reserve volumes that can be expected to be recovered through existing wells with existing equipment and operating methods. Proved undeveloped reserves are proved reserve volumes that are expected to be recovered from new wells on undrilled acreage or from existing wells where a significant expenditure is required for recompilation. All of the Company's proved reserves are in the United States. The Company's oil and gas reserves are priced at $40.58 per barrel and $5.30 per Mcf, respectively, at December 31, 2004. F-22
10-K52nd Page of 54TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 52nd
OIL BBLS GAS MCF -------- --------- December 31, 2001 190,310 5,212,269 Revisions of previous estimates (7,525) (572,723) Acquisition of minerals in place -- -- Sales of minerals in place -- -- Net discoveries and extensions -- -- Production (20,852) (720,072) -------- --------- December 31, 2002 161,933 3,919,474 Revisions of previous estimates 55,261 (317,234) Acquisition of minerals in place -- -- Sales of minerals in place -- -- Production (19,294) (599,000) December 31, 2003 197,900 3,003,240 Revisions of previous estimates (40,031) (522,246) Acquisition of minerals in place Sales of minerals in place -- -- Production (17,789) (469,558) December 31, 2004 140,080 2,011,440 ======== ========= The Company's proved developed reserves are as follows: [Download Table] DEVELOPED UNDEVELOPED OIL BBLS GAS MCF OIL BBLS GAS MCF -------- --------- -------- --------- December 31, 2004 140,080 2,011,440 32,880 334,100 December 31, 2003 197,900 3,003,240 -- 516,440 December 31, 2002 161,933 3,919,474 -- 138,050 Interest in proved reserves of unconsolidated affiliates OIL BBLS GAS MCF -------- --------- December 31, 2004 -- 1,979,000 December 31, 2003 -- 1,979,000 December 31, 2002 -- 1,979,000 STANDARDIZED MEASURE OF DISCOUNTED FUTURE NET CASH FLOW The standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows relating to the Company's proved oil and gas reserves is calculated and presented in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 69. Accordingly, future cash inflows were determined by applying year-end oil and gas prices to the Company's estimated share of the future production from proved oil and gas reserves. Future production and development costs were computed by applying year-end costs to future years. Applying year-end statutory tax rates to the estimated net future cash flows derived future income taxes. A prescribed 10% discount factor was applied to the future net cash flows. In the Company's opinion, this standardized measure is not a representative measure of fair market value. The standardized measure is intended only to assist financial statement users in making comparisons among companies. F-23
10-K53rd Page of 54TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 53rd
[Enlarge/Download Table] 2004 2003 2002 ------------ ------------ ------------ Future cash inflows $16,308,760 $21,705,930 $20,637,745 Future development costs (73,800) (160,780) (189,877) Future production costs (6,691,180) (7,472,950) (6,131,777) ------------ ------------ ------------ Future net cash flows 9,548,750 14,091,190 14,862,770 Future income tax expenses (3,246,575) (4,791,004) (4,904,714) Annual 10% discount rate (300,190) (4,650,009) (4,082,803) ------------ ------------ ------------ Standardized measure discounted future net cash flows $ 6,001,810 $ 4,650,177 $ 5,875,253 ============ ============ ============ CHANGES IN STANDARDIZED MEASURE OF DISCOUNTED FUTURE NET CASH FLOWS The principal sources of change in the standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 were as follows: [Enlarge/Download Table] 2004 2003 2002 Beginning of the year $4,650,177 $5,875,253 $ 4,377,001 Sales and transfers of oil and gas produced, net of production costs -- Sales of reserves in place -- -- Net changes in prices and production costs (1,341,179) 1,498,252 Net changes in income taxes (113,710) -- Changes in estimated future development costs, net of current 48,303 development costs Acquisition of minerals in place -- Revision of previous estimates -- Changes in production rate and other -- Accretion of discount ---------- ---------- ---------- End of year 6,001,810 4,650,177 5,875,253 ========== ========== ========== COMPLETE Selected Quarterly Financial Data (amounts in thousands, except per share data) (Unaudited): [Enlarge/Download Table] QUARTER ENDED ------------- MARCH 31 JUNE 30 SEPTEMBER 30 DECEMBER 31 TOTAL 2004 2004 2004 2004 2004 ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- Total Revenues $ 1,893 $ 1,526 $ 3,122 $ 2,038 $ 8,579 Net Income (loss) before taxes $ 915 $ 273 $ 588 $ (207) $ 1,569 Cumulative effect of an accounting change $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- Net Income (loss) $ 845 $ -- $ (595) $ (270) $ (20) Earnings (loss) per Common Share -Basic and Diluted $ 0.32 $ 0.00 $ (0.23) $ (0.09) $ (0.00) F-24
10-KLast Page of 54TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 54th
[Enlarge/Download Table] QUARTER ENDED ------------- MARCH 31 JUNE 30 SEPTEMBER 30 DECEMBER 31 TOTAL 2003 2003 2003 2003 2003 ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- Total Revenues $ 1,974 $ 2,942 $ 1,928 $ 2,041 $ 8,885 Net Income (loss) before taxes $ 852 $ 1,906 $ 826 $ (124) $ 3,708 Cumulative effect of an accounting change $ (264) $ -- $ -- $ -- $ (264) Net Income $ 588 $ 1,906 $ 808 $ (1,046) $ 2,256 Earnings (loss) per Common Share -Basic and Diluted $ 0.22 $ 0.72 $ 0.31 $ (0.40) $ 0.85 QUARTER ENDED ------------- MARCH 31 JUNE 30 SEPTEMBER 30 DECEMBER 31 TOTAL 2002 2002 2002 2002 2002 ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- Total Revenues $ 1,076 $ 1,130 $ 1,047 $ 1,228 $ 4,372 Net Income (loss) before taxes $ (160) $(1.833) $ (60) $ (141) $(1,913) Cumulative effect of an accounting change $ 3,516 $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- Net Income $ 3,516 $(1,370) $ (60) $ (209) $ 1,717 Earnings (loss) per Common Share -Basic and Diluted $ 1.27 $ (0.52) $ (0.02) $ (0.09) $ 0.65 F-25

Dates Referenced Herein   and   Documents Incorporated by Reference

Referenced-On Page
This ‘10-K’ Filing    Date First  Last      Other Filings
5/31/064041
12/31/051010-K,  10-K/A
12/15/0540
12/1/057
10/31/05449
6/20/0543
5/25/0515
4/14/05449
Filed as of:3/31/0510-Q,  NT 10-Q
Filed on:3/30/051288-K
3/29/0543
3/24/0524
3/15/05308-K
3/9/059498-K
2/28/057
1/13/052324
For Period End:12/31/04153
12/1/0410
11/19/04278-K
10/17/04846
9/30/042710-Q
7/27/047
7/25/047
7/1/048464
3/15/042239
3/5/0431
2/15/047
2/10/0415
1/1/044
12/31/03105310-K,  10-K/A
12/9/03408-K
6/30/033910-Q,  10-Q/A
6/15/032340
5/31/032340
1/1/033148
12/31/02185310-K
6/30/022710-Q
6/12/0227
1/1/022339
12/31/013710-K405
9/11/0113
6/30/01233610-Q
1/1/0141
3/25/0049
3/24/002444
11/1/99278-K
12/31/972710KSB
9/4/9726
1/26/947
8/13/9344
3/17/9326
1/21/9326
6/11/9225
3/5/9225
 List all Filings 
Top
Filing Submission 0001188112-05-000575   –   Alternative Formats (Word / Rich Text, HTML, Plain Text, et al.)

Copyright © 2024 Fran Finnegan & Company LLC – All Rights Reserved.
AboutPrivacyRedactionsHelp — Tue., Apr. 30, 3:03:33.2am ET