UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Form 10-Q

(Mark One)
[X]		QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 2004

OR

Commission File Number: 0-26176

EchoStar Communications Corporation

(303) 723-1000
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Not Applicable
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes  [X]  No  [   ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes  [X]  No  [   ]

As of July 30, 2004, the Registrant’s outstanding common stock consisted of 215,857,912 shares of Class A Common Stock and 238,435,208 Shares of Class B Common Stock.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

DISCLOSURE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

We make “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 throughout this document. Whenever you read a statement that is not simply a statement of historical fact (such as when we describe what we “believe,” “intend,” “plan,” “estimate,” “expect” or “anticipate” will occur and other similar statements), you must remember that our expectations may not be correct, even though we believe they are reasonable. We do not guarantee that any future transactions or events described herein will happen as described or that they will happen at all. You should read this document completely and with the understanding that actual future results may be materially different from what we expect. Whether actual events or results will conform with our expectations and predictions is subject to a number of risks and uncertainties. The risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, the following:

i

All cautionary statements made herein should be read as being applicable to all forward-looking statements wherever they appear. In this connection, investors should consider the risks described herein and should not place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements.

We assume no responsibility for updating forward-looking information contained or incorporated by reference herein or in other reports we file with the SEC.

In this document, the words “we,” “our” and “us” refer to EchoStar Communications Corporation and its subsidiaries, unless the context otherwise requires. “EDBS” refers to EchoStar DBS Corporation and its subsidiaries.

ii

ECHOSTAR COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed consolidated financial statements.

1

ECHOSTAR COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed consolidated financial statements.

2

ECHOSTAR COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed consolidated financial statements.

3

ECHOSTAR COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION

1.     Organization and Business Activities

Principal Business

EchoStar Communications Corporation (“ECC”) is a holding company. Its subsidiaries (which together with ECC are referred to as “EchoStar”, the “Company” “we”, “us”, and/or “our”) operate two interrelated business units:

Since 1994, we have deployed substantial resources to develop the “EchoStar DBS System.” The EchoStar DBS System consists of our FCC-allocated DBS spectrum, our owned and leased satellites, EchoStar receiver systems, digital broadcast operations centers, customer service facilities, and certain other assets utilized in our operations. Our principal business strategy is to continue developing our subscription television service in the United States to provide consumers with a fully competitive alternative to cable television service.

2.     Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”) and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X for interim financial information. Accordingly, these statements do not include all of the information and notes required for complete financial statements. In our opinion, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. Operating results for the six months ended June 30, 2004 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2004. For further information, refer to the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 (“2003 10-K”). The results of operations for the three and six months ended June 2004 include a charge of approximately $13.0 million to establish a reserve for estimated “Subscriber-related expenses” relating to prior periods. This reserve may increase or decrease in future periods.

Effective January 1, 2004, we combined “Subscription television service” revenue and “Other subscriber-related revenue” into “Subscriber-related revenue.” Additionally, “Equipment sales” and “Cost of sales – equipment” now include non-DISH Network receivers and other accessories sold by our EchoStar International Corporation subsidiary to international customers which were previously included in “Other” revenue and “Cost of sales – other,” respectively. All prior period amounts were reclassified to conform to the current period presentation.

Principles of Consolidation

We consolidate all majority owned subsidiaries and investments in entities in which we have controlling influence. Non-majority owned investments are accounted for using the equity method when we have the ability to significantly influence the operating decisions of the investee. When we do not have the ability to significantly influence the operating decisions of an investee, the cost method is used. For entities that are considered variable interest entities we apply the provisions of FASB Interpretation No. (FIN) 46-R, “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, and Interpretation of ARB No. 51” (“FIN 46-R”). All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

4

ECHOSTAR COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — Continued
(Unaudited)

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses for each reporting period. Estimates are used in accounting for, among other things, allowances for uncollectible accounts, inventory allowances, self insurance obligations, deferred tax asset valuation allowances, loss contingencies, fair values of financial instruments, asset impairments, useful lives of property and equipment, royalty obligations and smart card replacement obligations. Actual results may differ from previously estimated amounts. Estimates and assumptions are reviewed periodically, and the effects of revisions are reflected in the period they occur.

Comprehensive Income (Loss)

The components of comprehensive income (loss), net of tax, are as follows:

“Accumulated other comprehensive income” presented on the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets consists of the accumulated net unrealized gains (losses) on available-for-sale securities and foreign currency translation adjustments, net of deferred taxes.

Basic and Diluted Income (Loss) Per Share

Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 128, “Earnings Per Share” (“SFAS 128”) requires entities to present both basic earnings per share (“EPS”) and diluted EPS. Basic EPS excludes dilution and is computed by dividing income (loss) to common shareholders by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted EPS reflects the potential dilution that could occur if dilutive stock options were exercised and convertible securities were converted to common stock.

The following table reflects the basic and diluted weighted-average shares:

As of June 30, 2004 and 2003, we had approximately 18.9 million and 18.5 million options for the purchase of shares of class A common stock outstanding, respectively. The potential dilution from stock options exercisable into approximately

5

ECHOSTAR COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — Continued
(Unaudited)

3.6 million and 5.0 million shares of common stock computed using the treasury stock method based on the average fair market value of the class A common stock for the period, were included in our weighted-average diluted common shares outstanding for the three months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively. The potential dilution from stock options exercisable into approximately 3.9 million and 5.3 million shares of common stock, calculated as previously described, were included for the six months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively.

Of the options to purchase a total of approximately 18.9 million shares outstanding as of June 30, 2004, options to purchase approximately 7.4 million shares were outstanding under a long-term incentive plan. Vesting of these options is contingent upon meeting certain longer-term goals which have not yet been achieved. Accordingly, the long-term incentive options are not included in the diluted EPS calculation.

As of June 30, 2004 and 2003, our 5 3/4% Convertible Subordinated Notes due 2008 were convertible into approximately 23.1 million shares of Class A Common stock. As of June 30, 2004, our 3% Convertible Subordinated Note due 2010 was convertible into approximately 6.9 million shares of Class A Common stock. As of June 30, 2003, our 4 7/8% Convertible Subordinated Notes due 2007 (our “4 7/8% Notes”) were convertible into approximately 22.0 million shares of Class A Common stock. We redeemed the $1.0 billion outstanding principal amount of our 4 7/8% Notes during October 2003. Our convertible notes are not included in the diluted EPS calculation for all periods presented as their conversion would be antidilutive.

Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation

We have elected to follow the intrinsic value method of accounting under Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees,” (“APB 25”) and related interpretations in accounting for our stock-based compensation plans. Under APB 25, we generally do not recognize compensation expense on the grant of options under our stock incentive plans because typically the option terms are fixed and the exercise price equals or exceeds the market price of the underlying stock on the date of grant. We apply the “disclosure only” provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 123, “Accounting and Disclosure of Stock-Based Compensation,” (“SFAS 123”).

Pro forma information regarding net income and earnings per share is required by SFAS 123 and has been determined as if we had accounted for our stock-based compensation plans using the fair market value method prescribed by that statement. For purposes of pro forma disclosures, the estimated fair value of the options is amortized to expense over the options’ vesting period on a straight-line basis. All options are initially assumed to vest. Compensation previously recognized is reversed to the extent unvested options are forfeited upon termination of employment. The following table illustrates the effect on net income (loss) per share if we had accounted for our stock-based compensation plans using the fair value method:

6

ECHOSTAR COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — Continued
(Unaudited)

For purposes of this pro forma presentation, the fair value of each option was estimated at the date of the grant using a Black-Scholes option pricing model. The Black-Scholes option valuation model was developed for use in estimating the fair value of exchange traded options which have no vesting restrictions and are fully transferable. Consequently, our estimate of fair value may differ from other valuation models. Further, the Black-Scholes model requires the input of highly subjective assumptions and because changes in the subjective input assumptions can materially affect the fair value estimate, the existing model does not necessarily provide a reliable single measure of the fair value of stock-based compensation awards.

Non-cash, stock-based compensation

During 1999, we adopted a plan under our 1995 Stock Incentive Plan, which provided certain key employees with incentives including stock options. The table below shows the amount of compensation expense recognized under this performance-based plan for the three and six months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003. There is no remaining deferred compensation to be recognized under this plan subsequent to March 31, 2004.

We report all non-cash compensation based on stock option appreciation as a single expense category in our condensed consolidated statements of operations. The following table shows the other expense categories in our condensed consolidated statements of operations that would be affected if non-cash, stock-based compensation was allocated to the same expense categories as the base compensation for key employees who participate in the 1999 incentive plan:

Options to purchase 7.4 million shares were outstanding pursuant to a long-term incentive plan under our 1995 Stock Incentive plan as of June 30, 2004. These options were granted with exercise prices at least equal to the market value of the underlying shares on the dates they were issued during 1999, 2000 and 2001. The weighted-average exercise price of these options is $9.21. Vesting of these options is contingent upon meeting certain longer-

7

ECHOSTAR COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — Continued
(Unaudited)

term goals which have not yet been achieved. Consequently, no compensation was recorded during the six months ended June 30, 2004 related to these long-term options. We will record the related compensation upon the achievement of the performance goals, if ever. This compensation, if recorded, could result in material non-cash, stock-based compensation expense in our condensed consolidated statements of operations.

3.     Marketable and Non-Marketable Investment Securities

We currently classify all marketable investment securities as available-for-sale. We adjust the carrying value of our available-for-sale securities to fair market value and report the related temporary unrealized gains and losses as a component of “Accumulated other comprehensive income”, net of related deferred income tax. Declines in the fair market value of a marketable investment security which are estimated to be “other than temporary” are recognized in the condensed consolidated statements of operations, thereby establishing a new cost basis for the investment. We evaluate our marketable investment securities portfolio on a quarterly basis to determine whether declines in the fair market value of these securities are other than temporary. This quarterly evaluation consists of reviewing, among other things, the fair market value of our marketable investment securities compared to the carrying amount, the historical volatility of the price of each security and any market and company specific factors related to each security. Generally, absent specific factors to the contrary, declines in the fair market value of investments below cost basis for a period of less than six months are considered to be temporary. Declines in the fair market value of investments for a period of six to nine months are evaluated on a case by case basis to determine whether any company or market-specific factors exist which would indicate that these declines are other than temporary. Declines in the fair market value of investments below cost basis for greater than nine months are considered other than temporary and are recorded as charges to earnings, absent specific factors to the contrary.

As of June 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003, we had unrealized gains of approximately $29.2 million and $79.6 million, respectively, as a part of “Accumulated other comprehensive income” within “Total stockholders’ deficit”. During the six months ended June 30, 2004, we did not record any charges to earnings for other than temporary declines in the fair market value of our marketable investment securities, and we realized net losses of approximately $8.5 million on marketable and non-marketable investment securities. Our approximately $1.856 billion of restricted and unrestricted cash, cash equivalents and marketable investment securities includes debt and equity securities which we own for strategic and financial purposes. The fair market value of these strategic marketable investment securities aggregated approximately $153.2 million as of June 30, 2004. During the six months ended June 30, 2004, our portfolio generally, and our strategic investments particularly, experienced volatility. If the fair market value of our marketable securities portfolio does not remain above cost basis or if we become aware of any market or company specific factors that indicate that the carrying value of certain of our securities is impaired, we may be required to record charges to earnings in future periods equal to the amount of the decline in fair value.

We also have made, and may continue in the future to make, strategic equity investments in securities that are not publicly traded, including equity interests we received in exchange for cash and non-cash consideration (Note 6). Our ability to realize value from our strategic investments in companies that are not publicly traded is dependent on the success of their business and their ability to obtain sufficient capital to execute their business plans. Since private markets are not as liquid as public markets, there is also increased risk that we will not be able to sell these investments, or that when we desire to sell them we will not be able to obtain full value for them. We evaluate our non-marketable investment securities on a quarterly basis to determine whether the carrying value of each investment is impaired. This quarterly evaluation consists of reviewing, among other things, company business plans and current financial statements, if available, for factors which may indicate an impairment in our investment. These factors may include, but are not limited to, cash flow concerns, material litigation, violations of debt covenants and changes in business strategy. During the six months ended June 30, 2004, we did not record any impairment charges with respect to these instruments.

8

ECHOSTAR COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — Continued
(Unaudited)

4.     Inventories

Inventories consist of the following:

5.     Satellites

We review our long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable in accordance with the provision of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets” (“SFAS 144”), We consider the relevant cash flows, estimated operating results and other information in evaluating the performance of our satellites in accordance with SFAS 144 and have determined the carrying value of our satellites are fully recoverable. We will continue to evaluate the performance of our satellites as new events or changes in circumstances become known.

EchoStar III

During January 2004, a Traveling Wave Tube Amplifier (“TWTA”) pair on our EchoStar III satellite failed, resulting in a loss of service on one of our licensed transponders. An additional TWTA pair failed in March 2004. Including the seven TWTA pairs that malfunctioned in prior years, these anomalies have resulted in the failure of a total of 18 TWTAs on the satellite to date. While originally designed to operate a maximum of 32 transponders at any given time, the satellite was equipped with a total of 44 TWTAs to provide redundancy. EchoStar III can now operate a maximum of 26 transponders but due to redundancy switching limitations and specific channel authorizations, currently it can only operate on 18 of the 19 FCC authorized frequencies we own or lease at the 61.5 degree west orbital location. While we don't expect a large number of TWTAs to fail in any year, it is likely that additional TWTA failures will occur from time to time in the future, and that those failures will further impact commercial operation of the satellite. We will continue to evaluate the performance of EchoStar III as new events or changes in circumstances become known.

EchoStar V

Our EchoStar V satellite is equipped with a total of 96 solar array strings, 92 of which are required to assure full power availability for the 12-year design life of the satellite. Prior to 2004, EchoStar V experienced anomalies resulting in the loss of 4 solar array strings. During March 2004, EchoStar V lost an additional solar array string, reducing solar array power to approximately 95% of its original capacity. While originally designed to operate a maximum of 32 transponders at any given time, the solar array anomalies may prevent the use of all 32 transponders for the full 12-year design life of the satellite. In addition, momentum wheel anomalies previously experienced resulted in more rapid use of fuel and a corresponding minor reduction of spacecraft life. An investigation of the anomalies is continuing. Until the root causes are finally determined, there can be no assurance that future anomalies will not cause further losses which could impact commercial operation of the satellite. EchoStar V is not currently carrying any traffic and is being utilized as an in-orbit spare. We will continue to evaluate the performance of EchoStar V and may be required to reduce the remaining depreciable life as new events or circumstances develop.

9

ECHOSTAR COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — Continued
(Unaudited)

EchoStar VI

Prior to 2004, EchoStar VI had lost a total of 3 solar array strings. In April 2004 and again in July 2004, EchoStar VI experienced anomalies resulting in the loss of two additional solar array strings, bringing the total number of string losses to five. The satellite has a total of approximately 112 solar array strings and approximately 106 are required to assure full power availability for the estimated 12-year design life of the satellite. An investigation of the solar array anomalies, none of which have impacted commercial operation of the satellite, is continuing. Until the root cause of these anomalies is finally determined, there can be no assurance future anomalies will not cause further losses which could impact commercial operation of the satellite.

EchoStar VII

During March 2004, our EchoStar VII satellite lost a solar array circuit. EchoStar VII was designed with 24 solar array circuits and needs 23 for the spacecraft to be fully operational at end of life. While this anomaly is not expected to reduce the estimated design life of the satellite to less than 12 years and has not impacted commercial operation of the satellite to date, an investigation of the anomaly is continuing. Until the root causes are finally determined, there can be no assurance future anomalies will not cause further losses which could impact commercial operation of the satellite.

EchoStar VIII

During June 2004, EchoStar VIII experienced an anomaly which affected operation of one of the primary gyroscopes on the satellite. A spare gyroscope has been switched in and is performing nominally. EchoStar VIII was originally configured with three primary, and one spare gyroscope. Further, an anomaly previously experienced has resulted in certain gyroscopes being utilized for aggregate periods of time substantially in excess of their originally qualified limits in order to maintain nominal spacecraft operations and pointing. An investigation is underway to determine the root cause of the anomaly and to develop procedures for continued spacecraft operation in the event of future gyroscope anomalies. Until the root cause of the anomaly is determined, there can be no assurance future anomalies will not cause losses which could impact commercial operation of the satellite. We depend on EchoStar VIII to provide local channels to over 40 markets. In the event that EchoStar VIII experienced a total or substantial failure, we could transfer many, but not all of those channels to other in-orbit satellites.

Satellite Insurance

In September 1998, we filed a $219.3 million insurance claim for a total loss under the launch insurance policies covering our EchoStar IV satellite. The satellite insurance consists of separate substantially identical policies with different carriers for varying amounts that, in combination, create a total insured amount of $219.3 million. The insurance carriers include La Reunion Spatiale; AXA Reinsurance Company (n/k/a AXA Corporate Solutions Reinsurance Company), United States Aviation Underwriters, Inc., United States Aircraft Insurance Group; Assurances Generales De France I.A.R.T. (AGF); Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s, London; Great Lakes Reinsurance (U.K.) PLC; British Aviation Insurance Group; If Skaadeforsikring (previously Storebrand); Hannover Re (a/k/a International Hannover); The Tokio Marine & Fire Insurance Company, Ltd.; Marham Space Consortium (a/k/a Marham Consortium Management); Ace Global Markets (a/k/a Ace London); M.C. Watkins Syndicate; Goshawk Syndicate Management Ltd.; D.E. Hope Syndicate 10009 (Formerly Busbridge); Amlin Aviation; K.J. Coles & Others; H.R. Dumas & Others; Hiscox Syndicates, Ltd.; Cox Syndicate; Hayward Syndicate; D.J. Marshall & Others; TF Hart; Kiln; Assitalia Le Assicurazioni D’Italia S.P.A. Roma; La Fondiaria Assicurazione S.P.A., Firenze; Vittoria Assicurazioni S.P.A., Milano; Ras — Riunione Adriatica Di Sicurta S.P.A., Milano; Societa Cattolica Di Assicurazioni, Verano; Siat Assicurazione E Riassicurazione S.P.A, Genova; E. Patrick; ZC Specialty Insurance; Lloyds of London Syndicates 588 NJM, 1209 Meb AND 861 Meb; Generali France Assurances; Assurance France Aviation; and Ace Bermuda Insurance Ltd.

10

ECHOSTAR COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — Continued
(Unaudited)

The insurance carriers offered us a total of approximately $88.0 million, or 40% of the total policy amount, in settlement of the EchoStar IV insurance claim. The insurers assert, among other things, that EchoStar IV was not a total loss, as that term is defined in the policy, and that we did not abide by the exact terms of the insurance policies. We strongly disagree and filed arbitration claims against the insurers for breach of contract, failure to pay a valid insurance claim and bad faith denial of a valid claim, among other things. Due to forum selection clauses in certain of the policies, we are pursuing our arbitration claims against Ace Bermuda Insurance Ltd. in London, England, and our arbitration claims against all of the other insurance carriers in New York, New York. The New York arbitration commenced on April 28, 2003, and the Arbitration Panel has conducted approximately thirty-five days of hearings. The insurers have requested additional proceedings in the New York arbitration before any final arbitration award is made by the Panel. The parties to the London arbitration have agreed to stay that proceeding pending a ruling in the New York arbitration. There can be no assurance as to when an arbitration award may be made and what amount, if any, we will receive in either the New York or the London arbitrations or, if we do, that we will retain title to EchoStar IV with its reduced capacity.

At the time we filed our claim in 1998, we recognized an initial impairment loss of $106.0 million to write-down the carrying value of the satellite and related costs, and simultaneously recorded an insurance claim receivable for the same amount. As of December 31, 2003, EchoStar IV was fully depreciated. While there can be no assurance that we will receive the amount claimed in either the New York or the London arbitrations, we continue to believe the insurance claim amount is fully recoverable and expect to receive a favorable decision prior to December 31, 2004.

The indentures related to certain of EDBS’s senior notes contain restrictive covenants that require us to maintain satellite insurance with respect to at least three of the ten satellites EDBS owns or leases. We currently do not carry traditional insurance for any of our satellites. To satisfy insurance covenants related to EDBS’ senior notes, we classify an amount equal to the depreciated cost of three of our satellites as “Cash reserved for satellite insurance” on our balance sheet. As of June 30, 2004, this amount totaled approximately $107.1 million. We will continue to reserve cash for satellite insurance on our balance sheet until such time, if ever, as we again insure our satellites on acceptable terms and for acceptable amounts, or until the covenants requiring that insurance are no longer applicable. The amount reserved is not adequate to fund the construction, launch and insurance of a replacement satellite, and it typically takes several years to design, construct and launch a satellite.

6.     Other Noncurrent Assets

South.com LLC

In December 2003, we made an investment in South.com LLC (“South.com”), a variable interest entity we consolidate in our condensed consolidated financial statements in accordance with FIN 46-R. South.com was formed to, among other things, bid on and hold FCC licenses. During December 2003, South.com paid a $7.1 million deposit to participate in the January 2004 FCC license auction. During January 2004, South.com paid an additional deposit to the FCC of $20.6 million as the high-bidder on several licenses. These deposits are included in “Other current assets” in our condensed consolidated balance sheets as of June 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003.

Gemstar-TV Guide International Transaction

During March 2004, we entered into an agreement with Gemstar-TV Guide International, Inc. (“Gemstar”) for use of certain Gemstar intellectual property and technology, use of the TV Guide brand on our interactive program guides, and for distribution arrangements with Gemstar to provide for the launch and carriage of the TV Guide Channel as well as the extension of an existing distribution agreement for carriage of the TVG Network, and acquired Gemstar’s Superstar/Netlink Group LLC (“SNG”), UVTV distribution, and SpaceCom businesses and related assets, for an aggregate cash payment of $238.0 million, plus transaction costs. We further agreed to resolve all of our outstanding litigation with Gemstar. These transactions, which were substantially completed on April 4, 2004, were entered into contemporaneously and accounted for as a purchase business combination in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 141, “Business Combinations” (“SFAS 141”).

11

ECHOSTAR COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — Continued
(Unaudited)

Based on an independent third-party valuation, the purchase consideration was allocated to identifiable tangible and intangible assets and liabilities as follows (in thousands):

The total $260.5 million of acquired intangible assets resulting from the Gemstar transactions is comprised of contract-based intangibles totaling approximately $187.2 million with estimated weighted-average useful lives of twelve years, and customer relationships totaling approximately $73.3 million with estimated weighted-average useful lives of five years.

The business combination did not have a material impact on our results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2004 and would not have materially impacted our results of operations for these periods had the business combination occurred on January 1, 2004. Further, the business combination would not have had a material impact on our results of operations for the comparable periods in 2003 had the business combination occurred on January 1, 2003.

Goodwill and Intangible Assets

As of June 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003, we had approximately $313.2 million and $52.7 million of gross identifiable intangibles, respectively, with related accumulated amortization of approximately $54.8 million and $42.9 million, respectively. These identifiable intangibles consist of the following:

Amortization of these intangible assets with an average finite useful life primarily ranging from approximately five to twelve years was $9.6 million and $11.9 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2004, respectively. For all of 2004, the aggregate amortization expense related to these identifiable intangible assets is estimated to be $33.7 million. The aggregate amortization expense is estimated to be approximately $33.6 million for 2005, $31.7 million for 2006, $29.1 million for 2007, and $27.1 million for 2008. In addition, we had approximately $3.4 million of goodwill as of June 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003 which arose from a 2002 acquisition.

Other

During the six months ended June 30, 2004, we made cash payments, assumed certain liabilities and entered into agreements in exchange for equity interests in certain entities. We accounted for the equity interests received in accordance with Emerging Issues Task Force Issue No. 00-8, “Accounting by a Grantee for an Equity Instrument to be Received in Conjunction with Providing Goods or Services” (“EITF 00-8”) and recorded

12

ECHOSTAR COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — Continued
(Unaudited)

approximately $77.3 million related to the fair value of these equity interests in “Other noncurrent assets” as of June 30, 2004. We account for these unconsolidated investments under either the equity method or cost method of accounting. Approximately $56.5 million in value of these equity interests has been recorded as a deferred credit and will be recognized as reductions to “Subscriber-related expenses” ratably as our actual costs are incurred under the related agreements in accordance with the guidance under EITF Issue No. 02-16, “Accounting by a Customer (including a Reseller) for Certain Consideration Received from a Vendor” (“EITF 02-16”). These deferred credits have been recorded as a component of “Long-term deferred revenue, distribution and carriage payments and other long-term liabilities” in our condensed consolidated balance sheet.

7.     Long-Term Debt

9 3/8% Senior Note Redemption

Effective February 2, 2004, EDBS redeemed the remaining $1.423 billion principal amount of its outstanding 9 3/8% Senior Notes due 2009 at 104.688%, for a total of approximately $1.490 billion. The premium paid of approximately $66.7 million, along with unamortized debt issuance costs of approximately $10.8 million, were recorded as charges to interest expense in February 2004.

9 1/8% Senior Note Repurchases

During the second quarter of 2004, EDBS repurchased in open market transactions approximately $8.8 million principal amount of its 9 1/8% Senior Notes due 2009. The approximate $1.1 million difference between the market price paid and the principal amount of the notes, together with approximately $0.1 million of unamortized debt issuance costs related to the repurchased notes, were recorded as charges to interest expense during the second quarter of 2004 .

8.     Commitments and Contingencies

Contingencies

Distant Network Litigation

Until July 1998, we obtained feeds of distant broadcast network channels (ABC, NBC, CBS and FOX) for distribution to our customers through PrimeTime 24. In December 1998, the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida entered a nationwide permanent injunction requiring PrimeTime 24 to shut off distant network channels to many of its customers, and henceforth to sell those channels to consumers in accordance with the injunction.

In October 1998, we filed a declaratory judgment action against ABC, NBC, CBS and FOX in the United States District Court for the District of Colorado. We asked the Court to find that our method of providing distant network programming did not violate the Satellite Home Viewer Act and hence did not infringe the networks’ copyrights. In November 1998, the networks and their affiliate association groups filed a complaint against us in Miami Federal Court alleging, among other things, copyright infringement. The Court combined the case that we filed in Colorado with the case in Miami and transferred it to the Miami Federal Court.

In February 1999, the networks filed a Motion for Temporary Restraining Order, Preliminary Injunction and Contempt Finding against DirecTV, Inc. in Miami related to the delivery of distant network channels to DirecTV customers by satellite. DirecTV settled that lawsuit with the networks. Under the terms of the settlement between DirecTV and the networks, some DirecTV customers were scheduled to lose access to their satellite-provided distant network channels by July 31, 1999, while other DirecTV customers were to be disconnected by December 31, 1999. Subsequently, substantially all providers of satellite-delivered network programming other than us agreed to this cut-off schedule, although we do not know if they adhered to this schedule.

13

ECHOSTAR COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — Continued
(Unaudited)

In April 2002, we reached a private settlement with ABC, Inc., one of the plaintiffs in the litigation, and jointly filed a stipulation of dismissal. In November 2002, we reached a private settlement with NBC, another of the plaintiffs in the litigation, and jointly filed a stipulation of dismissal. On March 10, 2004, we reached a private settlement with CBS, another of the plaintiffs in the litigation, and jointly filed a stipulation of dismissal. We have also reached private settlements with many independent stations and station groups. We were unable to reach a settlement with five of the original eight plaintiffs – Fox and the independent affiliate groups associated with each of the four networks.

A trial took place during April 2003 and the Court issued a final judgment in June 2003. The Court found that with one exception our current distant network qualification procedures comply with the law. We have revised our procedures to comply with the District Court’s Order. Although the plaintiffs asked the District Court to enter an injunction precluding us from selling any local or distant network programming, the District Court refused. While the plaintiffs did not claim monetary damages and none were awarded, the plaintiffs were awarded approximately $4.8 million in attorneys’ fees. This amount is substantially less than the amount the plaintiffs sought. We appealed the fee award and the Court recently vacated the fee award. The District Court also allowed us an opportunity to conduct discovery concerning the amount of plaintiffs’ requested fees. The parties have agreed to postpone discovery and an evidentiary hearing regarding attorney fees until after the Court of Appeals rules on the pending appeal of the Court’s June 2003 final judgment. It is not possible to make a firm assessment of the probable outcome of plaintiffs’ outstanding request for fees.

The District Court’s injunction requires us to use a computer model to re-qualify, as of June 2003, all of our subscribers who receive ABC, NBC, CBS or Fox programming by satellite from a market other than the city in which the subscriber lives. The Court also invalidated all waivers historically provided by network stations. These waivers, which have been provided by stations for the past several years through a third party automated system, allow subscribers who believe the computer model improperly disqualified them for distant network channels to none-the-less receive those channels by satellite. Further, even though the Satellite Home Viewer Improvement Act provides that certain subscribers who received distant network channels prior to October 1999 can continue to receive those channels through December 2004, the District Court terminated the right of our grandfathered subscribers to continue to receive distant network channels.

We believe the District Court made a number of errors and appealed the decision. Plaintiffs cross-appealed. The Court of Appeals granted our request to stay the injunction until our appeal is decided. Oral argument occurred on February 26, 2004. It is not possible to predict how or when the Court of Appeals will rule on the merits of our appeal.

In the event the Court of Appeals upholds the injunction, and if we do not reach private settlement agreements with additional stations, we will attempt to assist subscribers in arranging alternative means to receive network channels, including migration to local channels by satellite where available, and free off air antenna offers in other markets. However, we cannot predict with any degree of certainty how many subscribers will cancel their primary DISH Network programming as a result of termination of their distant network channels. We could be required to terminate distant network programming to all subscribers in the event the plaintiffs prevail on their cross-appeal and we are permanently enjoined from delivering all distant network channels. Termination of distant network programming to subscribers would result, among other things, in a reduction in average monthly revenue per subscriber and a temporary increase in subscriber churn.

Gemstar

During October 2000, Starsight Telecast, Inc., a subsidiary of Gemstar-TV Guide International, Inc. (“Gemstar”), filed a suit for patent infringement against us and certain of our subsidiaries in the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, Asheville Division.

14

ECHOSTAR COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — Continued
(Unaudited)

In December 2000, we filed suit against Gemstar-TV Guide (and certain of its subsidiaries) in the United States District Court for the District of Colorado alleging violations by Gemstar of various federal and state anti-trust laws and laws governing unfair competition. Gemstar filed counterclaims alleging infringement of additional patents and asserted new patent infringement counterclaims.

In February 2001, Gemstar filed additional patent infringement actions against us in the District Court in Atlanta, Georgia and with the ITC. We settled all of the litigation with Gemstar during 2004 (Note 6).

Superguide

During 2000, Superguide Corp. (“Superguide”) filed suit against us, DirecTV and others in the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, Asheville Division, alleging infringement of United States Patent Nos. 5,038,211, 5,293,357 and 4,751,578 which relate to certain electronic program guide functions, including the use of electronic program guides to control VCRs. Superguide sought injunctive and declaratory relief and damages in an unspecified amount. We examined these patents and believe that they are not infringed by any of our products or services.

It is our understanding that these patents may be licensed by Superguide to Gemstar. Gemstar was added as a party to this case and asserted these patents against us. Gemstar’s claim against us was resolved as a part of the settlement discussed above.

A Markman ruling interpreting the patent claims was issued by the Court and in response to that ruling; we filed motions for summary judgment of non-infringement for each of the asserted patents. Gemstar filed a motion for summary judgment of infringement with respect to one of the patents. During July 2002, the Court ruled that none of our products infringe the 5,038,211 and 5,293,357 patents. With respect to the 4,751,578 patent, the Court ruled that none of our current products infringed that patent and asked for additional information before it could rule on certain low-volume products that are no longer in production. During July 2002, the Court summarily ruled that the low-volume products did not infringe any of the asserted patents. Accordingly, the Court dismissed the case and awarded us our court costs and the case was appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.

On February 12, 2004, the Federal Circuit affirmed in part and reversed in part the District Court’s findings and remanded the case back to the District Court for further proceedings. A petition for reconsideration of the Federal Circuit Decision was denied. Based upon the settlement with Gemstar, we now have an additional defense in this case based upon a license from Gemstar. We will continue to vigorously defend this case. In the event that a Court ultimately determines that we infringe on any of the patents, we may be subject to substantial damages, which may include treble damages and/or an injunction that could require us to materially modify certain user-friendly electronic programming guide and related features that we currently offer to consumers. It is not possible to make a firm assessment of the probable outcome of the suit or to determine the extent of any potential liability or damages.

Broadcast Innovation, LLC

In November of 2001, Broadcast Innovation, LLC filed a lawsuit against us, DirecTV, Thomson Consumer Electronics and others in Federal District Court in Denver, Colorado. The suit alleges infringement of United States Patent Nos. 6,076,094 (“the ‘094 patent”) and 4,992,066 (“the ‘066 patent”). The ‘094 patent relates to certain methods and devices for transmitting and receiving data along with specific formatting information for the data. The ‘066 patent relates to certain methods and devices for providing the scrambling circuitry for a pay television system on removable cards. We examined these patents and believe that they are not infringed by any of our products or services. Subsequently, DirecTV and Thomson settled with Broadcast Innovation leaving us as the only defendant.

On January 23, 2004, the judge issued an order finding the ‘066 patent invalid. Motions with respect to the infringement, invalidity and construction of the ‘094 patent remain pending. We intend to continue to vigorously

15

ECHOSTAR COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — Continued
(Unaudited)

defend this case. In the event that a Court ultimately determines that we infringe on any of the patents, we may be subject to substantial damages, which may include treble damages and/or an injunction that could require us to materially modify certain user-friendly features that we currently offer to consumers. It is not possible to make a firm assessment of the probable outcome of the suit or to determine the extent of any potential liability or damages.

TiVo Inc.

In January of 2004, TiVo Inc. filed a lawsuit against us in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas. The suit alleges infringement of United States Patent No. 6,233,389 (“the ‘389 patent”). The ‘389 patent relates to certain methods and devices for providing what the patent calls “time-warping”. We have examined this patent and do not believe that it is infringed by any of our products or services. We intend to vigorously defend this case and we have moved to have it transferred to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. In the event that a Court ultimately determines that we infringe this patent, we may be subject to substantial damages, which may include treble damages and/or an injunction that could require us to materially modify certain user-friendly features that we currently offer to consumers. It is not possible to make a firm assessment of the probable outcome of the suit or to determine the extent of any potential liability or damages.

California Action

A purported class action relating to the use of terms such as “crystal clear digital video,” “CD-quality audio,” and “on-screen program guide,” and with respect to the number of channels available in various programming packages was filed against us in the California State Superior Court for Los Angeles County in 1999 by David Pritikin and by Consumer Advocates, a nonprofit unincorporated association. The complaint alleges breach of express warranty and violation of the California Consumer Legal Remedies Act, Civil Code Sections 1750, et seq., and the California Business & Professions Code Sections 17500 & 17200. A hearing on the plaintiffs’ motion for class certification and our motion for summary judgment was held during 2002. At the hearing, the Court issued a preliminary ruling denying the plaintiffs’ motion for class certification. However, before issuing a final ruling on class certification, the Court granted our motion for summary judgment with respect to all of the plaintiffs’ claims. Subsequently, we filed a motion for attorneys’ fees which was denied by the Court. The plaintiffs filed a notice of appeal of the court’s granting of our motion for summary judgment and we cross-appealed the Court’s ruling on our motion for attorneys’ fees. During December 2003, the Court of Appeals affirmed in part; and reversed in part, the lower court’s decision granting summary judgment in our favor. Specifically, the Court found there were triable issues of fact as to whether we may have violated the alleged consumer statutes “with representations concerning the number of channels and the program schedule.” However, the Court found no triable issue of fact as to whether the representations “crystal clear digital video” or “CD quality” audio constituted a cause of action. Moreover, the Court affirmed that the “reasonable consumer” standard was applicable to each of the alleged consumer statutes. Plaintiff argued the standard should be the “least sophisticated” consumer. The Court also affirmed the dismissal of Plaintiffs’ breach of warranty claim. Plaintiff filed a Petition for Review with the California Supreme Court and we responded. During March 2004, the California Supreme Court denied Plaintiff’s Petition for Review. Therefore, the action has been remanded to the trial court pursuant to the instructions of the Court of Appeals. It is not possible to make an assessment of the probable outcome of the litigation or to determine the extent of any potential liability.

Retailer Class Actions

We have been sued by retailers in three separate purported class actions. During October 2000, two separate lawsuits were filed in the Arapahoe County District Court in the State of Colorado and the United States District Court for the District of Colorado, respectively, by Air Communication & Satellite, Inc. and John DeJong, et al. on behalf of themselves and a class of persons similarly situated. The plaintiffs are attempting to certify nationwide classes on behalf of certain of our satellite hardware retailers. The plaintiffs are requesting the Courts to declare certain provisions of, and changes to, alleged agreements between us and the retailers invalid and unenforceable, and to award damages for lost incentives and payments, charge backs, and other compensation. We are vigorously defending against the suits and have asserted a variety of counterclaims. The United States District Court for the District of Colorado stayed the

16

ECHOSTAR COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — Continued
(Unaudited)

Federal Court action to allow the parties to pursue a comprehensive adjudication of their dispute in the Arapahoe County State Court. John DeJong, d/b/a Nexwave, and Joseph Kelley, d/b/a Keltronics, subsequently intervened in the Arapahoe County Court action as plaintiffs and proposed class representatives. We have filed a motion for summary judgment on all counts and against all plaintiffs. The plaintiffs have filed a motion for additional time to conduct discovery to enable them to respond to our motion. The Court has not ruled on either of the two motions. It is not possible to make an assessment of the probable outcome of the litigation or to determine the extent of any potential liability or damages.

Satellite Dealers Supply, Inc. (“SDS”) filed a lawsuit against us in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas during September 2000, on behalf of itself and a class of persons similarly situated. The plaintiff was attempting to certify a nationwide class on behalf of sellers, installers, and servicers of satellite equipment who contract with us and who allege that we: (1) charged back certain fees paid by members of the class to professional installers in violation of contractual terms; (2) manipulated the accounts of subscribers to deny payments to class members; and (3) misrepresented, to class members, the ownership of certain equipment related to the provision of our satellite television service. During September 2001, the Court granted our motion to dismiss. The plaintiff moved for reconsideration of the Court’s order dismissing the case. The Court denied the plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration. The trial court denied our motions for sanctions against SDS. Both parties perfected appeals before the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals. On appeal, the Fifth Circuit upheld the dismissal for lack of personal jurisdiction. The Fifth Circuit vacated and remanded the District Court’s denial of our motion for sanctions. The District Court subsequently issued a written opinion containing the same findings. The only issue remaining is our collection of costs, which were previously granted by the Court.

StarBand Shareholder Lawsuit

During August 2002, a limited group of shareholders in StarBand filed an action in the Delaware Court of Chancery against us and EchoBand Corporation, together with four EchoStar executives who sat on the Board of Directors for StarBand, for alleged breach of the fiduciary duties of due care, good faith and loyalty, and also against us and EchoBand Corporation for aiding and abetting such alleged breaches. Two of the individual defendants, Charles W. Ergen and David K. Moskowitz, are members of our Board of Directors. The action stems from the defendants’ involvement as directors, and our position as a shareholder, in StarBand, a broadband Internet satellite venture in which we invested. During July 2003, the Court granted the defendants’ motion to dismiss on all counts. The Plaintiffs appealed. On April 15, 2004, the Delaware Supreme Court remanded the case instructing the Chancery Court to re-evaluate its decision in light of a recent opinion of the Delaware Supreme Court, Tooley v. Donaldson, No. 84,2004 (Del. Supr. April 2, 2004). It is not possible to make a firm assessment of the probable outcome of the litigation or to determine the extent of any potential liability or damages.

Enron Commercial Paper Investment Complaint

During November 2003, an action was commenced in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York, against approximately 100 defendants, including us, who invested in Enron’s commercial paper. The complaint alleges that Enron’s October 2001 prepayment of its commercial paper is a voidable preference under the bankruptcy laws and constitutes a fraudulent conveyance. The complaint alleges that we received voidable or fraudulent prepayments of approximately $40.0 million. We typically invest in commercial paper and notes which are rated in one of the four highest rating categories by at least two nationally recognized statistical rating organizations. At the time of our investment in Enron commercial paper, it was considered to be high quality and considered to be a very low risk. It is too early to make an assessment of the probable outcome of the litigation or to determine the extent of any potential liability or damages.

Acacia

In June of 2004, Acacia Media Technologies filed a lawsuit against us in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. The suit also named DirecTV, Comcast, Charter, Cox and a number of smaller

17

ECHOSTAR COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — Continued
(Unaudited)

cable companies as defendants. Acacia is an intellectual property holding company which seeks to license the patent portfolio that it has acquired. The suit alleges infringement of United States Patent Nos. 5,132,992, 5,253,275, 5,550,863, 6,002,720 and 6,144,702 (herein after the ‘992, ‘275, ‘863, ‘720 and ‘702 patents, respectively). The ‘992, ‘863, ‘720 and ‘702 patents have been asserted against us although Acacia’s complaint does not identify any products or services that it believes are infringing these patents. These patents relate to various systems and methods related to the transmission of digital data. The ‘992 and ‘702 patents have also been asserted against several internet adult content providers in the United States District Court for the Central District of California. On July 12, 2004, that Court issued a Markman ruling which found that the ‘992 and ‘702 patents were not as broad as Acacia had contended. We intend to vigorously defend this case. In the event that a Court ultimately determines that we infringe on any of the patents, we may be subject to substantial damages, which may include treble damages and/or an injunction that could require us to materially modify certain user-friendly features that we currently offer to consumers. It is not possible to make a firm assessment of the probable outcome of the suit or to determine the extent of any potential liability or damages.

Fox Sports Direct

On June 14, 2004, Fox Sports Direct (“Fox”) sued us in the United States District Court Central District of California for alleged breach of contract. Fox claims, among other things, that we underpaid license fees for the period from January 2000 through December 2001 and has requested an accounting for the period from January 2000 through June 2003. Fox has claimed damages of $25.0 million, plus interest. An answer has not yet been filed and no discovery has commenced. It is too early to determine whether or not we will have liability for license fees in excess of our paid and accrued programming costs, or for interest.

In addition to the above actions, we are subject to various other legal proceedings and claims which arise in the ordinary course of business. In our opinion, the amount of ultimate liability with respect to any of these actions is unlikely to materially affect our financial position, results of operations or liquidity.

9.     Depreciation and Amortization Expense

Depreciation and amortization expense consists of the following:

Cost of sales and operating expense categories included in our accompanying condensed consolidated statements of operations do not include depreciation expense related to satellites or equipment leased to customers.

18

ECHOSTAR COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — Continued
(Unaudited)

10.     Segment Reporting

Financial Data by Business Unit

Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 131, “Disclosures About Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information” (“SFAS 131”) establishes standards for reporting information about operating segments in annual financial statements of public business enterprises and requires that those enterprises report selected information about operating segments in interim financial reports issued to shareholders. Operating segments are components of an enterprise about which separate financial information is available and regularly evaluated by the chief operating decision maker(s) of an enterprise. Under this definition, we currently operate as two business units. The “All other” category consists of revenue and expenses from other operating segments for which the disclosure requirements of SFAS 131 do not apply.

11.     Related Party

As previously disclosed, we own 50% of NagraStar LLC (“NagraStar”), a joint venture that provides us with smart cards. As of June 30, 2004, we were committed to purchase approximately $101.3 million of smart cards from NagraStar. Approximately $44.4 million of these commitments had been accrued for as of June 30, 2004 on our condensed consolidated balance sheet.

12.     Subsequent Events

Common Stock Repurchase Programs

As previously disclosed, during the fourth quarter of 2003, our Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of an aggregate of up to $1.0 billion of our Class A common stock. During the six months ended June 30, 2004, we purchased approximately 22.9 million shares of our Class A common stock for approximately $722.5 million. During the period between July 1 and July 15, 2004, we repurchased approximately 2.9 million additional shares of our Class A common stock for approximately $87.1 million. As of July 15, 2004, we had completed the share repurchase plan, having purchased a total of 31.8 million shares of our Class A common stock for a total of $1.0 billion.

Effective August 9, 2004, our Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of an aggregate of up to an additional $1.0 billion of our Class A Common stock. We may make repurchases of our Class A Common stock through open market purchases or privately negotiated transactions subject to market conditions and other factors. Our repurchase programs do not require us to acquire any specific number or amount of securities and any of those programs may be terminated at any time. We may enter into Rule 10b5-1 plans from time to time to facilitate repurchases of our securities.

19

EXPLANATION OF KEY METRICS AND OTHER ITEMS

Subscriber-related revenue. “Subscriber-related revenue” consists principally of revenue from basic, movie, local, international and pay-per-view subscription television services, as well as rental and additional outlet fees from subscribers with multiple set-top boxes. Contemporaneous with the commencement of sales of co-branded services pursuant to our agreement with SBC Communications, Inc. (“SBC”) during the first quarter of 2004, “Subscriber-related revenue” also includes revenue from equipment sales, installation and other services related to that agreement. Revenue from equipment sales to SBC is deferred and recognized over the estimated average co-branded subscriber life. Revenue from installation and certain other services performed at the request of SBC is recognized upon completion of the services.

Development and implementation fees received from SBC are being recognized in “Subscriber-related revenue” over the next several years. In order to estimate the amount recognized monthly, we first divide the number of co-branded subscribers activated during the month under the SBC agreement by total estimated co-branded subscriber activations during the life of the contract. We then multiply this percentage by the total development and implementation fees received from SBC. The resulting estimated monthly amount is recognized as revenue ratably over an estimated average subscriber life.

Effective January 1, 2004, we combined “Subscription television service” revenue and “Other subscriber-related revenue” into “Subscriber-related revenue.” All prior period amounts were reclassified to conform to the current period presentation.

Equipment sales. “Equipment sales” consist of sales of digital set-top boxes by our ETC subsidiary to an international DBS service provider. “Equipment sales” also include unsubsidized sales of DBS accessories to DISH Network subscribers and to retailers and other distributors of our equipment domestically. “Equipment sales” does not include revenue from sales of equipment to SBC. Effective January 1, 2004, “Equipment sales” includes non-DISH Network receivers and other accessories sold by our EchoStar International Corporation subsidiary to international customers which were previously included in “Other” revenue. All prior period amounts were reclassified to conform to the current period presentation.

Subscriber-related expenses. “Subscriber-related expenses” include costs incurred in connection with our installation, in-home service and call center operations, programming expenses, copyright royalties, residual commissions, billing, lockbox, subscriber retention and other variable subscriber expenses. Contemporaneous with the commencement of sales of co-branded services pursuant to our agreement with SBC during the first quarter of 2004, “Subscriber-related expenses” also include the cost of sales and expenses from equipment sales, installation and other services related to that relationship. Cost of sales from equipment sales to SBC are deferred and recognized over the estimated average co-branded subscriber life. Expenses from installation and certain other services performed at the request of SBC are recognized as the services are performed.

Satellite and transmission expenses. “Satellite and transmission expenses” include costs associated with the operation of our digital broadcast centers, the transmission of local channels, contracted satellite telemetry, tracking and control services and transponder leases.

Cost of sales – equipment. “Cost of sales – equipment” principally includes costs associated with digital set-top boxes and related components sold to an international DBS service provider and unsubsidized sales of DBS accessories to DISH Network subscribers and to retailers and other distributors of our equipment domestically. “Cost of sales – equipment” does not include the costs from sales of equipment to SBC. Effective January 1, 2004, “Cost of sales – equipment” includes non-DISH Network receivers and other accessories sold by our EchoStar International Corporation subsidiary to international customers which were previously included in “Cost of sales – other.” All prior period amounts conform to the current period presentation.

Subscriber acquisition costs. Under most promotions, we subsidize the installation and all or a portion of the cost of EchoStar receiver systems in order to attract new DISH Network subscribers. Our “Subscriber acquisition costs” include the cost of EchoStar receiver systems sold to retailers and other distributors of our equipment, the cost of

20

receiver systems sold directly by us to subscribers, net costs related to our free installation promotions and other promotional incentives, and costs related to acquisition advertising. We exclude the value of equipment capitalized under our equipment lease program from our calculation of “Subscriber acquisition costs.” We also exclude payments and the value of returned equipment relating to disconnecting lease program subscribers from our calculation of “Subscriber acquisition costs”.

SAC. We are not aware of any uniform standards for calculating SAC and believe presentations of SAC may not be calculated consistently by different companies in the same or similar businesses. We calculate SAC by dividing total subscriber acquisition costs for a period by the number of gross new DISH Network subscribers during the period. We include all new DISH Network subscribers in our calculation, including DISH Network subscribers added with little or no subscriber acquisition costs.

General and administrative expenses. “General and administrative expenses” primarily include employee-related costs associated with administrative services such as legal, information systems, accounting and finance. It also includes outside professional fees (i.e. legal and accounting services) and building maintenance expense and other items associated with administration.

Interest expense. “Interest expense” primarily includes interest expense, prepayment premiums and amortization of debt issuance costs associated with our high yield and convertible debt securities, net of capitalized interest.

Other. The main components of “Other” income and expense are equity in earnings and losses of our affiliates, gains and losses on the sale of investments, or impairment of marketable and non-marketable investment securities.

Earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”). EBITDA is defined as “Net income (loss)” plus “Interest expense” net of “Interest income”, “Taxes” and “Depreciation and amortization”. Effective April 1, 2003, we include “Other income and expense” items in our definition of EBITDA. All prior period amounts conform to the current period presentation.

DISH Network subscribers. We include customers obtained through direct sales, and through our retail networks, including our co-branding relationship with SBC and other similar marketing arrangements, in our DISH Network subscriber count. We believe our overall economic return for co-branded and traditional subscribers will be comparable. We also provide DISH Network service to hotels, motels and other commercial accounts. For certain of these commercial accounts, we divide our total revenue for these commercial accounts by an amount approximately equal to the retail price of our most widely distributed programming package, AT60 (but taking into account, periodically, price changes and other factors), and include the resulting number, which is substantially smaller than the actual number of commercial units served, in our DISH Network subscriber count.

During April 2004, we acquired the C-band subscription television service business of Superstar/Netlink Group LLC (“SNG”), the assets of which primarily consist of acquired customer relationships. Although we expect to convert some of these customer relationships from C-band subscription television services to our DISH Network DBS subscription television service, acquired C-band subscribers are not included in our DISH network subscriber count unless they have also subscribed to our DISH Network DBS television service.

Monthly average revenue per subscriber (“ARPU”). We are not aware of any uniform standards for calculating ARPU and believe presentations of ARPU may not be calculated consistently by other companies in the same or similar businesses. We calculate average monthly revenue per subscriber, or ARPU, by dividing average monthly “Subscriber-related revenues” for the period (total “Subscriber-related revenues” during the period divided by the number of months in the period) by our average DISH Network subscribers for the period. Average DISH Network subscribers are calculated for the period by adding the average DISH Network subscribers for each month and dividing by the number of months in the period. Average DISH Network subscribers for each month are calculated by adding the beginning and ending DISH Network subscribers for the month and dividing by two. As discussed in “Subscriber-related revenue” above, effective January 1, 2004 we include amounts previously reported as “Other subscriber-related revenue” in our ARPU calculation. All prior period amounts conform to the current period presentation.

21

Subscriber churn/subscriber turnover. We are not aware of any uniform standards for calculating subscriber churn and believe presentations of subscriber churn may not be calculated consistently by different companies in the same or similar businesses. We calculate percentage monthly subscriber churn by dividing the number of DISH Network subscribers who terminate service during each month by total DISH Network subscribers as of the beginning of that month. We calculate average monthly subscriber churn for any period by dividing the number of DISH Network subscribers who terminated service during that period by the average number of DISH Network subscribers eligible to churn during the period, and further dividing by the number of months in the period. Average DISH Network subscribers eligible to churn during the period are calculated by adding the DISH Network subscribers as of the beginning of each month in the period and dividing by the total number of months in the period.

Free Cash Flow. We define free cash flow as “Net cash flows from operating activities” less “Purchases of property and equipment”, as shown on our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.

22

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Three Months Ended June 30, 2004 Compared to the Three Months Ended June 30, 2003.

23

DISH Network subscribers. As of June 30, 2004, we had approximately 10.125 million DISH Network subscribers compared to approximately 8.800 million DISH Network subscribers at June 30, 2003, an increase of approximately 15.1%. DISH Network added approximately 340,000 net new DISH Network subscribers for the quarter ended June 30, 2004 compared to approximately 270,000 net new DISH Network subscribers during the same period in 2003. As the size of our subscriber base continues to increase, even if percentage subscriber churn remains constant, increasing numbers of gross new subscribers are required to sustain net subscriber growth.

Subscriber-related revenue. DISH Network “Subscriber-related revenue” totaled $1.661 billion for the three months ended June 30, 2004, an increase of $317.5 million or 23.6% compared to the same period in 2003. This increase was directly attributable to continued DISH Network subscriber growth and the increase in “ARPU” discussed below. DISH Network “Subscriber-related revenue” will continue to increase to the extent we are successful in increasing the number of DISH Network subscribers and maintaining or increasing revenue per subscriber.

ARPU. Monthly average revenue per DISH Network subscriber was approximately $55.59 during the three months ended June 30, 2004 and approximately $51.69 during the same period in 2003. The $3.90 increase in monthly average revenue per DISH Network subscriber is primarily attributable to price increases of up to $2.00 in February 2004 on some of our most popular packages, a reduction in the number of subscribers receiving subsidized programming through our free and discounted programming promotions, the increased availability of local channels by satellite and an increase in subscribers with multiple set-top boxes. We provided local channels by satellite in 136 markets as of June 30, 2004 as compared to 69 markets as of June 30, 2003. This increase was also partially attributable to revenue from equipment sales, installation and other services related to our relationship with SBC. While there can be no assurance, we expect revenues from this relationship, particularly the installation revenues, to continue to have a positive impact on ARPU in the near term to the extent that we continue to add co-branded subscribers under the agreement.

Impacts from our litigation with the networks in Florida, FCC rules governing the delivery of superstations and other factors could cause us to terminate delivery of network channels and superstations to a substantial number of our subscribers, which could cause many of those customers to cancel their subscription to our other services. In the event the Court of Appeals upholds the Miami District Court’s network litigation injunction, and if we do not reach private settlement agreements with additional stations, we will attempt to assist subscribers in arranging alternative means to receive network channels, including migration to local channels by satellite where available, and free off air antenna offers in other markets. However, we cannot predict with any degree of certainty how many subscribers might ultimately cancel their primary DISH Network programming as a result of termination of their distant network channels. We could be required to terminate distant network programming to all subscribers in the event the plaintiffs prevail on their cross-appeal and we are permanently enjoined from delivering all distant network channels. Termination of distant network programming to subscribers would result in a reduction in average monthly revenue per subscriber and a temporary increase in subscriber churn.

Equipment sales. For the three months ended June 30, 2004, “Equipment sales” totaled $85.7 million, an increase of $22.4 million compared to the same period during 2003. This increase principally resulted from an increase in unsubsidized sales of DBS accessories to DISH Network subscribers and to retailers and other distributors of our equipment domestically. The increase in sales of DBS accessories primarily relates to, among other things, subscriber equipment upgrades to support the launch of additional programming, including local markets. The increase in “Equipment sales” was partially offset by a decrease in sales of non-DISH Network receivers and other accessories sold by our EchoStar International Corporation subsidiary to international customers.

Subscriber-related expenses. “Subscriber-related expenses” totaled $900.8 million during the three months ended June 30, 2004, an increase of $246.1 million or 37.6% compared to the same period in 2003. The increase in “Subscriber-related expenses” was primarily attributable to the increase in the number of DISH Network subscribers which resulted in increased expenses to support the DISH Network. “Subscriber-related expenses” represented 54.2% and 48.7% of “Subscriber-related revenue” during the three months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively. The increase in this expense to revenue ratio primarily resulted from increases in our programming and subscriber retention costs, and costs

24

associated with the expansion of our installation, in-home service and call center operations. These increased operational costs, some of which are temporary, related to, among other things, more complicated installations required by a larger dish, or “SuperDISH”, used to receive programming from our FSS satellites. This increase also resulted from an approximate $13.0 million charge during the three months ended June 30, 2004 to establish a reserve for estimated expenses related to prior periods, and further to cost of sales and expenses from equipment sales, installation and other services related to our relationship with SBC. Since margins related to our co-branded subscribers are lower than for our traditional subscribers, we expect this relationship to continue to negatively impact this ratio to the extent that we continue to add co-branded subscribers under the agreement. The increase in the expense to revenue ratio from 2003 to 2004 was partially offset by the increase in monthly average revenue per DISH Network subscriber discussed above. The ratio of “Subscriber-related expenses” to “Subscriber-related revenue” could continue to increase if our programming and retention costs increase at a greater rate than our “Subscriber-related revenue.”

We currently offer local broadcast channels in approximately 143 markets across the United States. In 38 of those markets, two dishes are necessary to receive all local channels in the market. In connection with reauthorization of the Satellite Home Viewer Improvement Act this year, Congress is considering requiring that all local broadcast channels delivered by satellite to any particular market be available from one dish. We currently plan to transition all markets to a single dish by 2008. If a two-dish prohibition with a shorter transition period is enacted, we would be forced by capacity limitations to move the local channels in as many as 30 markets to new satellites, requiring subscribers in those markets to install a second dish to continue receiving their local channels. We may be forced to stop offering local channels in some of those markets altogether. The transition would result in disruptions of service for a substantial number of customers, and the cost of compliance could exceed $100.0 million. To the extent those costs are passed on to our subscribers, and because many subscribers may be unwilling to install a second dish where one had been adequate, it is expected that subscriber churn would be negatively impacted.

Satellite and transmission expenses. “Satellite and transmission expenses” totaled $27.6 million during the three months ended June 30, 2004, an $11.2 million increase compared to the same period in 2003. This increase primarily resulted from launch and operational costs, including lease payment obligations pursuant to our Fixed Satellite Service (“FSS”) agreements, associated with the increasing number of markets in which we offer local network channels by satellite as previously discussed. “Satellite and transmission expenses” totaled 1.7% and 1.2% of “Subscriber-related revenue” during each of the three months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively. The increase in the expense to revenue ratio principally resulted from additional operational costs to support launches of our local markets discussed above. These expenses will increase further in the future to the extent we enter into additional satellite lease agreements, obtain traditional satellite insurance, and to the extent we increase the operations at our digital broadcast centers as, among other things, additional satellites are placed in service and additional local markets and other programming services are launched.

Cost of sales – equipment. “Cost of sales – equipment” totaled $67.6 million during the three months ended June 30, 2004, an increase of $22.9 million compared to the same period in 2003. This increase related primarily to the increase in unsubsidized sales of DBS accessories to DISH Network subscribers and to retailers and other distributors of our equipment domestically discussed above and a $6.7 million write-off of certain defective DBS accessories provided by a bankrupt supplier. “Cost of sales — equipment” represented 78.9% and 70.7% of “Equipment sales”, during the three months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively. The increase in the expense to revenue ratio principally related to the write-off of certain defective DBS accessories discussed above.

Subscriber acquisition costs. “Subscriber acquisition costs” totaled approximately $365.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2004, an increase of $79.6 million or 27.9% compared to the same period in 2003. The increase in “Subscriber acquisition costs” was directly attributable to a larger number of gross DISH Network subscriber additions during the three months ended June 30, 2004 compared to the same period in 2003. “Subscriber acquisition costs” during the three months ended June 30, 2003 included a benefit of approximately $34.4 million resulting from a litigation settlement which also contributed to the increase. This increase was partially offset by a higher number of DISH Network subscribers participating in our equipment lease program and the acquisition of co-branded subscribers during 2004 as discussed under “SAC” below.

25

SAC. Subscriber acquisition costs per new DISH Network subscriber activation (“SAC”) were approximately $431 for the three months ended June 30, 2004 and approximately $408 during the same period in 2003. SAC during the three months ended June 30, 2003 included a benefit of approximately $34.4 million discussed above. Absent this benefit, our SAC for the three months ended June 30, 2003 would have been approximately $49 higher, or $457. The decrease in SAC during the three months ended June 30, 2004 as compared to the same period in 2003 (excluding this benefit) was primarily attributable to an increase in DISH Network subscribers participating in our equipment lease program, the acquisition of co-branded subscribers during 2004, and reduced subscriber acquisition advertising. These factors were partially offset by more expensive promotions we offered during 2004 including up to three free receivers for new subscribers and free advanced products, such as digital video recorders and high definition receivers. Further, during the three months ended June 30, 2004, since a greater number of DISH Network subscribers activated multiple receivers, receivers with multiple tuners or other advanced products, including SuperDISH, installation costs increased as compared to the same period in 2003. Finally, subscribers added during the three months ended June 30, 2004 received more free equipment and less discounted programming than new subscribers activated during the comparable period in 2003. This change in promotional mix increased both SAC and ARPU for the three months ended June 30, 2004 as compared to the same period in 2003. Our “Subscriber acquisition costs”, both in the aggregate and on a per new subscriber activation basis, may materially increase in the future to the extent that we introduce other more aggressive promotions if we determine that they are necessary to respond to competition, or for other reasons.

We exclude the value of equipment capitalized under our equipment lease program from our calculation of SAC. We also exclude payments and the value of returned equipment relating to disconnecting lease program subscribers from our calculation of SAC. If these amounts were included, our SAC would have been approximately $576 during the three months ended June 30, 2004 compared to $441 during the same period in 2003. As discussed above, “Subscriber acquisition costs” during the three months ended June 30, 2003 included a benefit of approximately $34.4 million or $49 per subscriber related to a litigation settlement. Absent this benefit, our SAC, including the value of equipment capitalized under our equipment lease program and including payments and the value of returned equipment relating to disconnecting lease program subscribers would have been $490 for the three months ended June 30, 2003. Our equipment lease penetration increased during the three months ended June 30, 2004 as compared to the same period in 2003. Additional penetration of our equipment lease program will increase capital expenditures. See further discussion of capitalized subscriber acquisition costs and payments and certain returned equipment relating to disconnecting lease program subscribers included in “Liquidity and Capital Resources – Subscriber Acquisition and Retention Costs”.

General and administrative expenses. “General and administrative expenses” totaled $97.2 million during the three months ended June 30, 2004, an increase of $8.1 million compared to the same period in 2003. The increase in “General and administrative expenses” was primarily attributable to increased personnel and infrastructure expenses to support the growth of the DISH Network. “General and administrative expenses” represented 5.5% and 6.3% of “Total revenue” during the three months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively. The decrease in this expense to revenue ratio resulted primarily from higher total revenues discussed above and administrative efficiencies.

Depreciation and amortization. “Depreciation and amortization” expense totaled $123.9 million during the three months ended June 30, 2004, a $23.6 million increase compared to the same period in 2003. The increase in “Depreciation and amortization” expense primarily resulted from additional depreciation related to the commencement of commercial operation of our EchoStar IX satellite in October 2003, and increases in depreciation related to equipment leased to customers and other additional depreciable assets placed in service during the second half of 2003 and the six months ended June 30, 2004. As of December 31, 2003, EchoStar IV was fully depreciated and accordingly, we recorded no expense for this satellite during the three months ended June 30, 2004. This partially offset the increase in depreciation expense discussed above.

Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized. “Interest expense” totaled $93.4 million during the three months ended June 30, 2004, a decrease of $14.3 million compared to the same period in 2003. This decrease primarily resulted from a reduction in interest expense of approximately $57.5 million as a result of debt redemptions and repurchases during 2003 and 2004. This decrease was partially offset by additional interest expense totaling approximately $40.0 million related to our $500.0 million 3% Convertible Subordinated Note due 2010 issued during July 2003 and our $2.5 billion aggregate of senior notes issued during October 2003, together with prepayment premiums and the write-off of debt

26

issuance costs totaling approximately $1.2 million related to repurchases of our 9 1/8% Senior Notes due 2009 during the second quarter of 2004.

Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization. EBITDA was $296.1 million during the three months ended June 30, 2004, compared to $325.0 million during the same period in 2003. EBITDA during the three months ended June 30, 2003 included a benefit of approximately $34.4 million related to a litigation settlement. Absent this 2003 benefit, our EBITDA for the three months ended June 30, 2004 would have been $5.5 million higher than EBITDA for the comparable period in 2003. The increase in EBITDA (excluding this benefit) was primarily attributable to increases in ARPU and in the number of DISH Network subscribers and an increase in the number of DISH Network subscribers participating in our equipment lease program (which results in an increase in capital expenditures and less SAC). The increase in EBITDA is also attributable in part to the acquisition of co-branded subscribers, which reduces overall SAC. These factors were partially offset by a higher number of gross DISH Network subscribers additions during the three months ended June 30, 2004 as compared to the same period in 2003 and by a decrease in “Other” income, principally related to $9.5 million in net losses realized from the sale of certain securities from our marketable and non-marketable investment portfolio together with increases in our “Subscriber-related expenses” and “Satellite and transmission expenses” as a percentage of “Subscriber-related revenue”. EBITDA does not include the impact of capital expenditures under our new and existing subscriber equipment lease programs of approximately $147.4 million and $29.8 million during the three months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively. As previously discussed, to the extent we introduce more aggressive marketing promotions and our subscriber acquisition costs materially increase, our EBITDA results will be negatively impacted because subscriber acquisition costs are generally expensed as incurred.

The following table reconciles EBITDA to the accompanying financial statements:

EBITDA is not a measure determined in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, or GAAP, and should not be considered a substitute for operating income, net income or any other measure determined in accordance with GAAP. EBITDA is used as a measurement of operating efficiency and overall financial performance and we believe it to be a helpful measure for those evaluating companies in the multi-channel video programming distribution industry. Conceptually, EBITDA measures the amount of income generated each period that could be used to service debt, pay taxes and fund capital expenditures. EBITDA should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for measures of performance prepared in accordance with GAAP.

Income tax benefit (provision), net. Our income tax policy is to record the estimated future tax effects of temporary differences between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and amounts reported in our accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets, as well as operating loss and tax credit carryforwards. We follow the guidelines set forth in Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes” (“SFAS 109”) regarding the recoverability of any tax assets recorded on the balance sheet and provide any necessary allowances as required. Determining necessary allowances requires us to make assessments about the timing of future events, including the probability of expected future taxable income and available tax planning opportunities. We currently have an approximately $1.1 billion valuation allowance recorded as an offset against all of our net deferred tax assets. In accordance with SFAS 109, we periodically evaluate our need for a valuation allowance based on both historical evidence, including trends, and future expectations in each reporting period. In the future, if we believe that it is more likely than not that some or all of our deferred tax assets will be realized, the current valuation allowance, or some

27

portion of it, would be reversed. Reversing our current recorded valuation allowance would have a material positive impact on our “Net income (loss)” for future periods. However, there can be no assurance if or when all or a portion of our valuation allowance will be reversed.

Net income (loss). “Net income” was $85.3 million during the three months ended June 30, 2004, a decrease of $43.5 million compared to $128.8 million for the same period in 2003. The decrease was primarily attributable to decreases in “Operating income” and “Other” income resulting from the factors discussed above, partially offset by a decrease in “Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized.” Our future net income (loss) results will be negatively impacted to the extent we introduce more aggressive marketing promotions that materially increase our subscriber acquisition costs since these subscriber acquisition costs are generally expensed as incurred.

28

Six Months Ended June 30, 2004 Compared to the Six Months Ended June 30, 2003.