To Our Stockholders:

You are cordially invited to attend the 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “Annual Meeting”) of Covenant Logistics Group, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”), to be held at 10:00 a.m. Eastern Daylight Time, on Wednesday, May 18, 2022.

The Annual Meeting is being held for the following purposes, as more fully described in the accompanying Proxy Statement:

Shares of Class A and Class B common stock may be voted at the Annual Meeting only if the holder is present at the Annual Meeting in person or by valid proxy.  YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT.  To ensure your representation at the Annual Meeting, you are requested to promptly date, sign, and return the accompanying proxy in the enclosed envelope.  You may also vote on the Internet by completing the electronic voting instruction form found at www.investorvote.com/CVLG or by telephone using a touch-tone telephone and calling 1-800-652-8683.  Returning your proxy now will not interfere with your right to attend the Annual Meeting, if you wish to do so.  The prompt return of your proxy may save us additional expenses of solicitation.

Pursuant to rules promulgated by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), we have elected to provide access to our proxy materials both by: (i) sending you this full set of proxy materials, including a proxy card; and (ii) notifying you of the availability of our proxy materials on the Internet.  This Notice of Meeting and Proxy Statement, and our Annual Report to Stockholders for the year ended December 31, 2021, are available free of charge and may be accessed at www.edocumentview.com/CVLG. In accordance with SEC rules, we do not use “cookies” or other software that identifies visitors accessing these materials on this website.  We encourage you to access and review all of the important information contained in the proxy materials before voting.

Chattanooga, Tennessee

This Notice of Meeting and Proxy Statement are furnished in connection with the solicitation of proxies from the stockholders of Covenant Logistics Group, Inc., a Nevada corporation, to be voted at the 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “Annual Meeting”), which will be held at 10:00 a.m. Eastern Daylight Time, on Wednesday, May 18, 2022, and any adjournment thereof.

The Proxy Statement, proxy card, and our 2021 Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 2021 (the “2021 Annual Report”), which collectively comprise our “proxy materials,” were first mailed on or about April 19, 2022, to stockholders of record at the close of business on our record date of March 29, 2022 (the “Record Date”).  Except to the extent it is incorporated by specific reference, the enclosed copy of our 2021 Annual Report is not incorporated into this Proxy Statement and is not to be deemed a part of the proxy solicitation material.

THE ENCLOSED PROXY IS SOLICITED BY OUR BOARD.  When a proxy is executed and returned (and not revoked) prior to the Annual Meeting, the proxy will be voted according to the instructions the stockholder made when granting the proxy.  Unless otherwise specified or if no choice is indicated on a proxy, all proxies received pursuant to this solicitation will be voted in accordance with the recommendations by our Board as follows:

Your executed proxy appoints the persons appointed to vote the proxies as your duly authorized attorney-in-fact and gives such persons the power to represent and vote at the Annual Meeting all shares of our outstanding Class A common stock, par value one cent ($0.01) per share (the “Class A common stock”), that you are entitled to vote as a stockholder.  Such persons will vote your shares as instructed by you on your proxy.  If you do not provide voting instructions on Proposals 1, 2, or 3 or for any other matters properly presented at the Annual Meeting, your proxy also gives such persons the discretionary authority to vote your shares represented thereby as recommended above by the Board and in accordance with any such person’s best judgment.  None of the proposals discussed in this Proxy Statement that are intended to be acted upon at the Annual Meeting are related to or conditioned upon the approval of any other matters.

The Record Date for the Annual Meeting is March 29, 2022.  Only stockholders of record at the close of business on the Record Date are entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting, either in person or by valid proxy.  Holders of Class A common stock are entitled to one vote for each share held.  Holders of Class B common stock, par value one cent ($0.01) per share (the “Class B common stock”), are entitled to two votes for each share held so long as David R. Parker or certain members of his immediate family beneficially own such shares.  In the event that any shares of our Class B common stock cease to be beneficially owned by Mr. Parker or certain of his immediate family members, such shares will be automatically converted into shares of our Class A common stock and will then be entitled to one vote per share.  Unless otherwise required by Nevada law, the Class A common stock and Class B common stock vote together as a single class.  We have no other class of stock outstanding.  Holders of Class A common stock and Class B common stock are not entitled to cumulative voting in the election of directors.  On the Record Date, the closing market price of our Class A common stock as reported on The NASDAQ Global Select Market^TM was $23.33 per share.

On the Record Date, there were issued and outstanding (i) 14,022,546 shares of Class A common stock (including 209,425 shares of restricted Class A common stock subject to certain performance vesting, time vesting, and holding provisions, which carry voting rights), entitled to cast an aggregate 14,022,546 votes on all matters subject to a vote at the Annual Meeting and (ii) 2,350,000 shares of Class B common stock entitled to cast an aggregate 4,700,000 votes on all matters subject to a vote at the Annual Meeting.  The total number of shares of our common stock issued and outstanding on the Record Date was approximately 16,372,546 and the holders of such shares are entitled to cast an aggregate of 18,722,546 votes on all matters subject to a vote at the Annual Meeting.  The number of shares of Class A common stock issued and outstanding as of the Record Date excludes 2,312,665 Class A treasury shares which are considered issued but not outstanding. The Inspector of Elections will tabulate votes cast at the Annual Meeting, and the results of all items voted upon will be announced at the Annual Meeting.  We will also disclose the final voting results in a Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC in accordance with SEC rules.

In order to transact business at the Annual Meeting, a quorum must be present.  A quorum is present if the holders of a majority of the voting power of the issued and outstanding shares of Class A and Class B common stock entitled to vote are represented at the Annual Meeting by telephone or by proxy.  Abstentions and broker non-votes will be counted for the purpose of determining whether a quorum is present.

Your type of stock ownership determines the method by which you may vote your shares.  If your shares are registered directly in your name in the stock register and stock transfer books of the Company or with our transfer agent (Computershare Investor Services), you are a “registered holder” and considered the stockholder of record with respect to those shares.  If you hold your shares through a broker, rather than holding shares registered directly in your name, you are considered a “beneficial owner” of shares held in street name.  Beneficial owners have the right to instruct their broker how to vote the shares held in their account.

If you are a registered holder of record of our Class A common stock, you may vote your shares either (i) over the telephone by calling a toll-free number set forth in your proxy card for voting prior to the Annual Meeting, (ii) by using the Internet and visiting the designated website, (iii) by mailing your proxy card, or (iv) in person at the Annual Meeting by notifying the Inspector of Elections prior to the occurrence of any votes.  Registered holders of our Class B stock may vote either by (i) mailing your proxy card or (ii) attending the Annual Meeting in person and notifying the Inspector of Elections prior to the occurrence of any votes.  For 2022, we have arranged for telephone and Internet-voting procedures to be used.  These procedures have been designed to authenticate your identity, to allow you to give instructions, and to confirm that those instructions have been recorded properly.  If you choose to vote by telephone or by using the Internet by accessing the designated website, please refer to the specific instructions on the proxy card.  The deadline for voting by telephone prior to the Annual Meeting or the Internet is 1:00 a.m. Eastern Daylight Time on Wednesday, May 18, 2022.  If you wish to vote using the proxy card, please complete, sign, and date your proxy card and return it to us before the Annual Meeting.

Beneficial owners who hold their shares in street name will need to obtain a voting instruction form from the broker or institution that holds their stock and must follow the voting instructions given by that broker or institution.  A beneficial owner of shares may not vote by telephone at the Annual Meeting unless they obtain from their broker or institution a legal proxy that gives them the right to vote the shares.

Returning a proxy card now will not interfere with your right to attend the Annual Meeting in person or to vote your shares in person at the Annual Meeting, if you wish to do so.  Stockholders who execute and return proxies may revoke them at any time before they are exercised during the call to vote by either (i) giving written notice of their revocation to our Secretary at our principal executive office address, (ii) executing a subsequent proxy and delivering it to our Secretary, or (iii) attending the Annual Meeting and voting at the Annual Meeting in person.  Attendance at the Annual Meeting, in and of itself, will not constitute a revocation of a proxy.

We will bear the cost of solicitation of proxies, which we expect to be nominal, and we will include reimbursements for the charges and expenses of brokerage firms and others for forwarding solicitation materials to beneficial owners of our outstanding Class A common stock.  Proxies will be solicited by mail, and may be solicited personally by directors, officers, and our regular employees, who will not receive any additional compensation for any such services.

The information included in this Proxy Statement should be reviewed in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements, Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm, and other information included in our 2021 Annual Report that was mailed on or about April 19, 2022, together with this Notice of Meeting and Proxy Statement, to all stockholders of record as of the Record Date.  A copy of our 2021 Annual Report is publicly available free of charge at www.edocumentview.com/CVLG.  Except to the extent it is incorporated by specific reference, our 2021 Annual Report is not incorporated into this Proxy Statement and is not considered to be a part of the proxy-soliciting materials.

Set forth below are the proposals to be considered by stockholders at the Annual Meeting, as well as important information concerning, among other things, our management and our Board; executive compensation; transactions between us and our officers, directors, and affiliates; the stock ownership of certain beneficial owners and management; the services provided to us by and fees of our independent registered public accounting firm; and instructions for stockholders who want to make proposals at our 2023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.  EACH STOCKHOLDER SHOULD READ THIS INFORMATION BEFORE VOTING.

At the Annual Meeting, the stockholders will elect eight directors to serve as the Board until our next Annual Meeting of Stockholders or until their successors are duly elected and qualified.  Upon the recommendation of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee of the Board (the “Nominating Committee”), our Board has nominated for election as directors the following eight individuals:  David R. Parker, Robert E. Bosworth, Dr. Benjamin S. Carson, Sr., D. Michael Kramer, Bradley A. Moline, Rachel Parker-Hatchett, Herbert J. Schmidt, and W. Miller Welborn. Each nominee is presently serving as a director. The individual qualifications, skills, and experience of the director nominees are discussed in their respective biographies below.

Each proxy will be voted as directed on each proxy card; or in the absence of contrary instructions, each proxy will be voted for the election of all director nominees.  In the event any director nominee becomes unwilling or unable to serve as a director prior to the vote on Proposal 1 at the Annual Meeting, the shares represented by your proxy will be voted for any substitute nominee designated by the Board, unless you expressly withhold authority to vote your shares for the unavailable nominee or substitute nominee.

The table below provides information on the qualifications, skills, and experience of our nominees for directorships.

The lack of a “✔” for a particular item does not mean that the director does not possess that qualification, skill or experience. We look to each director to be knowledgeable in these areas; however, the “✔” indicates that the item is a specific qualification, skill or experience that the director brings to the Board.

Information concerning the names, ages, positions with us, tenure as a Company director, and business experience of the nominees standing for election as directors at the Annual Meeting, as well as the specific attributes qualifying each nominee for a directorship, is set forth below.  Family relationships between any directors and executive officers, if any, are noted in the relevant biographies.  All references to experience with us include positions with our operating subsidiaries and none of the other corporations or organizations referenced in the biographies is a parent, subsidiary, or affiliate of the Company unless otherwise noted.  There are no arrangements or understandings between any of the director nominees and any other person pursuant to which any of the director nominees was selected as a nominee.  Each of the director nominees has also consented to being named as such in this Proxy Statement and has indicated his/her intention to serve as a director, if elected.

David R. Parker, 64, has served as our Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) since 1994. From our founding in 1985 to February 2016 Mr. Parker served as our President.  Mr. Parker is a past director of the Truckload Carriers Association and currently serves on the board of directors of the American Trucking Associations.  From 2012 to October 2017, Mr. Parker served as a member of the Trade and Transportation Advisory Council of the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta.  Mr. Parker has also served as a director or in similar capacities of several religious and civic organizations and serves as general partner of the Parker Family Limited Partnership.  The Board believes Mr. Parker’s dedication, trucking experience, general business knowledge, significant leadership ability, and in-depth knowledge of the Company, qualify him for his continued service as CEO, and Chairman of our Board.  Additionally, the Board believes Mr. Parker’s knowledge of the industry continues to be a competitive strength for the Company. Mr. Parker is the father of Ms. Parker-Hatchett.

Robert E. Bosworth, 74, has served as a director since 1998 and currently serves as a member of our Audit and our Compensation Committee, as well as our Lead Independent Director.  Mr. Bosworth served as a director of Chattem, Inc., a consumer products company from 1986 to 2010 and served on its audit committee from 1998 to 2005 and on its compensation committee from 2002 to 2005.  From September 2005 until his retirement in July 2012, Mr. Bosworth served as the President and Chief Operating Officer (“COO”) of Chattem, Inc.  Mr. Bosworth has also held directorships with several for-profit and non-profit organizations, as well as served as Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, director, and consultant of Hamico, Inc.  Mr. Bosworth holds an M.B.A. in finance.  The Board believes Mr. Bosworth’s services on the Chattem, Inc. board and on the boards of several other organizations have provided him with significant insight into board processes, functions, exercise of diligence, and oversight of management, and this knowledge benefits the Board.  The Board also believes Mr. Bosworth’s financial background, including his experience handling all financial functions of Chattem, Inc. and his familiarity and experience with applicable laws and regulations governing the preparation of financial statements filed with the SEC from when Chattem, Inc. was publicly traded, adds value to the Company’s Audit Committee and Board.

Dr. Benjamin S. Carson, Sr., 70, has served as a director since July 2021 and currently serves as a member of our Nominating and Risk Committees.  Additionally, Dr. Carson served as the 17th Secretary of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (“HUD”) from 2017 to 2021. Dr. Carson is a world-renowned neurosurgeon who prior to serving as HUD Secretary was involved with more than 15,000 surgical procedures and was the recipient of numerous awards, including the Presidential Medal of Freedom, more than 70 honorary doctorate degrees and the Spingarn Medal, the NAACP’s highest honor. Dr. Carson serves on the Board of Directors for D.R. Horton, Inc. (NYSE: DHI) and previously served on the Board of Directors of both The Kellogg Company (NYSE: K) and Costco Wholesale Corporation (NASDAQ: COST). Dr. Carson is the founder and current Chairman of the American Cornerstone Institute. Dr. Carson is on the Board of Directors of the Carson Scholars Fund, an organization he and his wife, Mrs. Candy Carson, founded in 1994.  Throughout his distinguished career, Dr. Carson contributed to the field of medicine through the thousands of surgeries he performed and the many leadership positions he held, including serving as Director of the Division of Pediatric Neurosurgery at The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions from 1984 to 2013 as well a Professor of Neurological Surgery, Oncology, Plastic Surgery and Pediatrics at The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions from 1999 to 2013.  The Board believes that Dr. Carson’s extensive management, director, leadership, financial, and information security experience make him highly qualified to serve as a member of our Board and Nominating and Risk Committees.

D. Michael Kramer, 64, has served as a director since 2020 and currently serves as the Chair of our Audit Committee and as a member of our Compensation Committee. Mr. Kramer has served as the Executive Chairman of Southeastern Trust Company since 2018.  Additionally, since 2019, Mr. Kramer has served as Chief Executive Officer of Peak Financial, LLC; a Fintech start-up company.  Mr. Kramer served as the Vice Chairman of Midsouth Bancorp, Inc. from May 2018 until Midsouth’s merger with Hancock Whitney Corporation (NASDAQ: HWC) in September 2019.  Mr. Kramer served as President and COO of Atlantic Capital Bancshares, Inc. (NYSE: ACBI) from November 2015 to December 2017, and was also a member of the Board of Directors of Atlantic Capital from November 2015 to October 2017.  Prior to that he served as Chief Executive Officer and President of First Security Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: FSGI) and its primary banking subsidiary, FSGBank, N.A. from 2011 through 2015, as Managing Director of Ridley Capital Group from 2010 to 2011, as Director, Chief Executive Officer and President of Ohio Legacy Corporation (NASDAQ: OLCB) from 2005 to 2010, and as Chief Operating Officer and Chief Technology Officer of Integra Bank Corporation from 1999 to 2004.  Mr. Kramer served as a member of the Board of Directors of the Chattanooga Area Chamber of Commerce Foundation from 2018 to 2021. Mr. Kramer serves as a member of the Board of Directors of the Covenant College Foundation and the University of Chattanooga Foundation.  Mr. Kramer has a Bachelor’s Degree from Grove City College and a Master’s in Business Administration from Western Governors University. The Board believes that Mr. Kramer’s extensive experience in leadership in the banking industry qualifies him to serve as a member of our Board, as Chair of our Audit Committee, and as a member of our Compensation Committee.

Bradley A. Moline, 55, has served as a director since 2003 and currently serves as a member of our Nominating Committee. Since October 2002, Mr. Moline has been President and CEO of ALLO Communications, LLC, a telecommunications company with significant minority equity interests held by Nelnet, Inc. (NYSE:NNI) and SDC Capital Partners, LLC.  He also serves on the Board of Directors of ALLO Communications, LLC.  In 2018, Mr. Moline joined the board of National Cable Television Cooperative, Inc., a Kansas nonprofit corporation and the University of Nebraska Foundation investment committee. Mr. Moline also has been the owner, President, and CEO of Imperial Super Foods and NECO Grocery, with grocery operations in Nebraska and Colorado, since 2002.  From 1994 to 1997, Mr. Moline was our Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”).  Mr. Moline also served as CFO of Birch Telecom Inc., a telecommunications company, when the company’s debt securities were publicly traded and previously worked for Ernst & Young, where he was formerly licensed as a CPA.  Mr. Moline holds a degree in Business Administration with an emphasis in accounting.  In his roles with the Company, Birch Telecom, and Ernst & Young, Mr. Moline gained experience overseeing financial matters and reviewing documents filed with the SEC.  The Board believes Mr. Moline's extensive financial and executive experience make Mr. Moline a valued member of our Board.  The Board also believes Mr. Moline’s wide array of executive experiences, including from his service as the Company’s CFO, has prepared him well to respond to complex financial and operational challenges.  The Board further believes that Mr. Moline’s experience as an executive officer of a public company and a company with publicly traded debt allows him to bring unique and valuable perspective to governance issues as Chair of our Nominating Committee.

Rachel Parker-Hatchett, 38, has served as a director since 2020 and currently serves on our Risk Committee. Ms. Parker-Hatchett held numerous positions within Covenant Transport between September 2006 and July 2020.  After graduating from the University of Tennessee at Chattanooga (UTC) with a Bachelor’s Degree in Business Management, she started with the Company as a Management Trainee working in multiple departments.  Ms. Parker-Hatchett began as a Marketing Intern before transferring to Operations in September 2007, where she ultimately spent the majority of her career.  Ms. Parker-Hatchett held the position of Customer Service Intern from September 2007 to January 2008, Fleet Manager Intern from January 2008 to June 2008, and Ops Intern from June 2008 to October 2008.  She then transferred to the Safety Department and held the position of Log Clerk from October 2008 to February 2010, when she was promoted to Operations Director for Covenant Solutions, the prior name for our brokerage operations.  Again, in March 2015, Ms. Parker-Hatchett was promoted to Director of Solutions and was in charge of training and development all personnel, overseeing change initiatives and Lead Measures, coordinating all daily meetings, and maintaining visibility to all new customers and their success within Solutions.  Ms. Parker-Hatchett served as Director of Solutions until March 2019. In February 2015, she participated in a year-long Executive Education Program conducted by UTC, where she met and coordinated with various leaders from the community once a month.  In 2019, she was named Women of Covenant Director, a position she held until July 2020.  Ms. Parker-Hatchett is also involved with many local non-profits and served on the board of a local non-profit, First Things First, from 2011 to 2013.  The Board believes that Ms. Parker-Hatchett’s extensive experience within the Company, our industry, and specific experience and expertise in our operations adds significant value to the Board and to her service on our Risk Committee. Ms. Parker-Hatchett is the daughter of Mr. Parker.

Herbert J. Schmidt, 66, has served as a director since 2013 and currently serves as Chairperson of our Risk Committee and as a member of our Nominating Committee. Additionally, Mr. Schmidt previously provided consulting services to the Company and SRT in particular. Mr. Schmidt previously served as the Executive Vice President (“EVP”) of Con-way Inc. and President of Con-way Truckload, both freight transportation providers, from 2007 until his retirement in 2012.  Prior to the merger of Contract Freighters, Inc. (“CFI”), another freight transportation provider, with Con-way Inc. in 2007, Mr. Schmidt held positions at CFI as President and CEO from 2005 to 2007 and President from 2000 to 2005.  Prior to his becoming President and CEO in 2005, he was employed in a series of progressively more responsible positions at CFI where he gained extensive knowledge in risk management, as well as leading the sales and operations functions as Senior Vice President of Operations.  Mr. Schmidt also served as a member of the Board of Directors of formerly publicly traded Empire District Electric Company 2010 through January 2017, including membership on the Compensation, Executive, and Strategic Projects Committees, and as a member of the Board of Directors of Daylight Transport, LLC, a privately held less-than-truckload carrier, since September 2013, including membership on the Compensation and M&A Committees.  The Board believes Mr. Schmidt’s extensive industry, operations, sales, risk management, and leadership experience adds significant value to the Board, to the Risk Committee he chairs, and to the Nominating Committee.

W. Miller Welborn, 63, has served as a director since 2017 and currently as our Lead Independent Director, Chair of our Compensation Committee, and as a member of our Audit Committee. Mr. Welborn has been Chairman of SmartFinancial, Inc. (NASDAQ: SMBK), a publicly traded holding company of SmartBank with over $4.3 billion in assets since 2015. From 2009 to 2015 Mr. Welborn served as Chairman of Cornerstone Bancshares, Inc., which was the publicly traded parent company of Cornerstone Community Bank prior to the bank’s merger with SmartBank in 2015, where he served on the Asset-Liability (ALCO), Loan, Governance, Nominating, Audit, and Compensation Committees. Mr. Welborn has also served as President of Welborn & Associates, Inc., a consulting firm specializing in transportation and logistics, since 2000.  He previously served as managing partner of Transport Capital Partners, LLC, another transportation advisory and consulting firm that he co-founded, from 2001 to 2014.  Prior to co-founding Transport Capital Partners, LLC, Mr. Welborn served in several executive and ownership capacities of various trucking companies, including as President, CEO, and a director of Boyd Bros Transportation, President and Chairman of Welborn Transport, Inc., a company he co-founded, and President of Cummings Trucking Co., Inc.  From 2010 to 2015 Mr. Welborn served as a partner of Lamp Post Group, Inc., a venture capital company with a portfolio of investments ranging from start-up level to over $600 million in annual revenue.  Mr. Welborn currently serves on multiple non-profit boards. The Board believes that Mr. Welborn’s over three decades of business experience, including experience in transportation consulting, executive roles at trucking companies, and serving on the boards of publicly traded companies, provides us with invaluable perspective and experience and qualifies him to serve as our Lead Independent Director. The Board also believes Mr. Welborn’s knowledge of executive compensation practices, including his prior service on the compensation committee of Cornerstone Bancshares, Inc., qualifies him to serve as Chair of our Compensation Committee.

Meetings.  Our Board held 14 meetings during the year ended December 31, 2021.  Each current member of the Board attended at least 75% of the aggregate of all meetings of the Board and of all committees on which he/she served, during his/her time as a director in 2021.  We encourage the members of our Board to attend our Annual Meeting of Stockholders, although we do not have a formal policy regarding director attendance at such meetings.  All of our then-current directors attended the 2021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

Director Independence.  Our Class A common stock is listed on The NASDAQ Global Select Market^TM.  Therefore, we are subject to the listing standards embodied in applicable NASDAQ Stock Market (“NASDAQ”) listing standards and the rules and regulations of the SEC, including those relating to corporate governance.  The Board has determined that the following directors and director nominees are “independent” under NASDAQ Rule 5605(a)(2):  Messrs. Bosworth, Carson, Kramer, Moline, Schmidt, and Welborn.  The Board has also determined that with respect to each of our Audit Committee, Compensation Committee, and Nominating Committee, each member and committee composition satisfies the applicable committee independence and membership requirements of NASDAQ and the SEC.  In accordance with NASDAQ Rule 5605(b)(2), in 2021, our independent directors held 4 special meetings of independent directors, without the presence of management.

Our Nominating Committee reviewed (i) the SEC regulatory and NASDAQ listing standards for assessing the independence of our directors and director nominees, (ii) the criteria for determining each such individual’s independence specifically for purposes of serving on the Audit Committee, Compensation Committee, and Nominating Committee, and as an “audit committee financial expert,” and (iii) each such individual’s professional experience, education, skills, ability to enhance differences of viewpoint and other qualities among our Board membership.  After concluding its review, the Nominating Committee submitted its independence recommendations to our Board.  Our Board then made its independence determinations based on the committee’s recommendations.

Board Oversight of Risk Management.  The Board has overall responsibility for risk oversight, which involves evaluating any material risks concerning us, as well as management’s decisions and efforts to identify, manage, and monitor such risks.  This oversight also includes understanding and determining what constitutes an appropriate level and tolerance of risk for the Company.  The Board addresses this responsibility as part of its periodic Board meetings.  The primary areas of risk assessment include financial and accounting risk, legal and compliance risk, technology and cyber security risk, succession risk, safety and security risk, operational and strategic risk, and regulatory risk. The Board has delegated oversight responsibility to each of the Board committees according to its respective area of responsibility. The Audit Committee oversees assessment and management of financial risks, is responsible for overseeing potential conflicts of interest, and monitor and mitigates risks relating to our deployment of financial resources, the management of our balance sheet and the investment of cash and other assets. The Compensation Committee is responsible for overseeing the management of risks relating to our executive and non-executive compensation policies and practices and the incentives created by our compensation policies and practices. The Nominating Committee is responsible for overseeing implementation of appropriate corporate governance procedures, monitoring and overseeing the management and mitigation of operating risks, and overseeing the management of risks associated with the independence of our Board, and overseeing of our plans, policies, and disclosures related to ESG matters.  The Risk Committee monitors and reviews the Company’s risk framework, including the adequacy and effectiveness of the Company’s risk management policies, safety initiatives, business continuation, and enterprise risk management program. In its risk oversight role, our Board considers and confers with management about risk administration.  Typically, management identifies, measures, and analyzes risks inherent to our business, operations, and industry.  Pursuant to the Board’s instruction, management regularly reports on applicable risks to the relevant committee or the full Board. As appropriate, additional review or reporting on risks are conducted as needed or as requested by our Board and its committees  Additionally, the Board conducts an annual risk assessment. The Board’s role in risk oversight has not affected the Board’s leadership structure.

Board Leadership Structure; Lead Independent Director.  The Board is responsible for overseeing our overall corporate governance and the competent and ethical management and operation of our business. The Board elects our Lead Independent Director each year. Mr. Welborn became our Lead Independent Director at the 2021 Annual Meeting, replacing Mr. Bosworth who had been Lead Independent Director since 2018. Mr. Parker currently serves as our Chairman of the Board and CEO.  The Board elects our Chairman of the Board and CEO annually.  Mr. Parker has served as our Chairman of the Board and CEO since 1994.

Our independent directors regularly meet without the presence of management.  These executive sessions are typically conducted before or after any Board meeting at which a majority of the independent directors are present or by holding special meetings of the independent directors. We believe that the Lead Independent Director has contributed to the efficiency and functionality of the full Board. The Lead Independent director presides over executive sessions and acts as a liaison between the between our independent directors and the Board.

The Board believes our leadership structure with Mr. Parker serving as Chairman of the Board and CEO and Mr. Welborn as Lead Independent Director is appropriate and suitable for proper and efficient Board functioning and communication.  We believe the combination of Mr. Parker’s leadership positions is effective for us given Mr. Parker’s in-depth knowledge of and experience in our business and industry. Further, his large beneficial stockholdings and long-standing service in senior leadership positions demonstrate to our stockholders Mr. Parker’s commitment to our growth and success.  As the CEO, Mr. Parker is also involved in the Company’s routine operations and is in a position to elevate critical business issues to the Board and senior management because he reports to the Board as the CEO with the other executive officers and participates in the meetings as a director.  The Board has determined the Chairman of the Board and CEO combination, together with a successful governance structure that includes the exercise of key oversight responsibilities by independent directors, provides an effective balance for the management of the Company and our stockholders’ best interests. Additionally, our Lead Independent Director provides for an effective balance for the management of the Company and our stockholders’ best interests. Our Board has the flexibility to modify our leadership structure in the future, as the Board deems appropriate or necessary.

Our Board and committees participate in a rigorous annual self-assessment process conducted by outside counsel involving written questionnaires, with inquiries in risk, strategic planning, succession planning, independence, Board composition, general Board operations and administration, and other areas.  Our Lead Independent Director reviews these results with outside counsel and the Board, periodically meets with other Board members, and provides management with actionable feedback.  Our Lead Independent Director also undergoes a thorough, written annual assessment conducted by outside counsel and reviewed with the Nominating Committee and the Board..

Proxy Access. Eligible stockholders who have continuously owned at least 3% of the issued and outstanding Class A common stock for at least three years and who otherwise meet the requirements set forth in our Sixth Amended and Restated Bylaws may have their director nominees included in our proxy materials. Eligible stockholders may aggregate up to 20 stockholders to reach the 3% ownership threshold. The number of director nominees nominated by an eligible stockholder or a group of eligible stockholders may not be more than 20% of the total number of directors of the Company, but not less than two. Notice of nominations must be received no earlier than 150 days and no later than 120 days prior to the anniversary of the date the Company mailed its proxy for the immediately preceding annual meeting of stockholders.

Corporate Governance Guidelines. The Board has adopted Corporate Governance Guidelines, which, along with our articles of incorporation, bylaws, and the charters of the Board’s Committees, form the framework of governance of the Company. Our Corporate Governance Guidelines are available on our website, www.covenantlogistics.com, under the “Governance” tab of the “Resources - Investors” menu.

Overboarding Policy. The Board approved an overboarding policy that prohibits Mr. Parker, as CEO and Chairman of the Board, from serving on more than three public company boards in total (including service on the Company’s Board), and prohibits the other board members from serving on more than five public company boards in total (including service on the Company’s Board.) This is to ensure that our directors devote adequate time for preparation and attendance at Board and Committee meetings, including the Annual Meeting of Stockholders. None of our directors serve on more than one public company board (excluding the Company).

Majority Vote Policy. Our Board’s majority vote standard requires that, for directors to be elected (or reelected) to serve on the Company’s Board, they must receive support from holders of a majority of shares voted. A director who is subject to an uncontested election at any stockholder meeting shall promptly tender his or her resignation for consideration by the Nominating Committee, if such director receives a greater number of votes “withheld” from or voted “against” his or her election than are voted “for” such election, excluding abstentions.  The Nominating Committee will promptly consider the tendered resignation and will recommend to the Board whether to accept the tendered resignation or to take some other action, such as rejecting the support from the holders of a majority of shares voted in the election of directors. In making this recommendation, the Nominating Committee will consider all factors deemed relevant by its members including, without limitation, the underlying reasons why stockholders voted against the director (if ascertainable), the length of service and qualifications of the director whose resignation has been tendered, the director’s contributions to the Company, whether by accepting such resignation the Company will no longer be in compliance with any applicable laws, rules, regulations, or governing documents, and whether or not accepting the resignation is in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders. The Board will act on the Nominating Committee’s recommendation no later than at its first regularly scheduled meeting following certification of the stockholder vote, but in any case, no later than 120 days following the certification of the stockholder vote. In considering the Nominating Committee’s recommendation, the Board will consider the factors considered by the Nominating Committee and such additional information and factors the Board believes to be relevant. The Company will promptly publicly disclose the Board’s decision and process in a periodic or current report filed with or furnished to the SEC. Any director who tenders his resignation pursuant to the majority vote policy will not participate in the Nominating Committee recommendation or Board consideration regarding whether or not to accept the tendered resignation. However, such director shall remain active and engaged in all other committee and Board activities, deliberations, and decisions during the Nominating Committee and Board process.

Anti-Hedging and Anti-Pledging Policy. Our anti-hedging and anti-pledging policy prohibits our CEO, President, and COO, as well as our directors, from (i) hedging their ownership positions in Class A or Class B common stock (including, but not limited to, short-selling, options, puts and calls, as well as derivatives such as swaps, forwards, and futures), (ii) pledging owned Class A or Class B common stock as collateral for loans, and (iii) purchasing our Class A common stock on margin. Hedging activities include hedging our Class A and Class B common stock.  There is no hardship exception to our anti-hedging and anti-pledging policy.

Stock Ownership Guidelines. Our stock ownership guidelines require our CEO, President, and COO, and non-employee directors to build or maintain certain stock ownership over time through equity grants. The stock ownership guidelines for our CEO are six times annual base salary. The stock ownership guidelines for our President and Senior EVP are one times annual base salary. The stock ownership guidelines for our non-employee directors are five times annual cash retainer.

Director Retirement Policy. In accordance with our Corporate Governance Guidelines, each director will resign as a director immediately prior to the Company’s annual meeting of stockholders first falling after the director attains 75 years of age. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Board has authority to waive mandatory retirement in individual cases, if in the judgement of the Board the best interests of the Company and the stockholders would be served by such waiver.

Stockholder Communications with the Board of Directors. Our Board has adopted procedures by which our stockholders may communicate with our Board regarding matters of substantial importance to us.  Information concerning the manner in which stockholders can communicate with the Board is set forth in our Stockholder Communications Procedures available on our website, www.covenantlogistics.com, under the “Governance” tab of the “Resources - Investors” menu. Our Stockholder Communications Procedures, which was adopted by the Board, describes the process for sending communications and determining which communications will be relayed to directors.  Please note that we reserve the right not to forward any abusive, threatening or otherwise inappropriate materials.

Functions, Composition, and Meetings of the Audit Committee.  Our Board has established a separately designated standing Audit Committee in accordance with Section 3(a)(58)(A) of the Exchange Act to oversee our accounting and financial reporting policies and processes in accordance with applicable SEC rules and NASDAQ listing standards. The primary responsibilities of the Audit Committee are set forth in the Audit Committee Report, which appears below, and are further described in the Audit Committee charter. Our Audit Committee is comprised of Messrs. Bosworth, Kramer, and Welborn. In March 2021, Mr. Kramer was appointed as Chair of the Audit Committee, replacing Mr. Bosworth as Chair.  The Audit Committee met 9 times during 2021.

Audit Committee Independence. Each member of the Audit Committee satisfies the independence and Audit Committee membership criteria set forth in NASDAQ Rule 5605(c)(2)(A).  Specifically, each member of the Audit Committee:

Audit Committee Charter.  Our Audit Committee operates pursuant to a written charter detailing its purpose, powers, and duties.  The Audit Committee reviews and reassesses the adequacy of its formal written charter on an annual basis and recommends changes to the Board when appropriate.  The charter is publicly available free of charge on our website, www.covenantlogistics.com, under the “Governance” tab of the “Resources - Investors” menu.

Audit Committee Financial Experts.  The Board has determined that the three members of the Audit Committee, Messrs. Bosworth, Kramer, and Welborn, qualify as “audit committee financial experts” under Item 407(d)(5)(ii) of SEC Regulation S-K.  In the judgment of the Board, each such individual (i) meets the Audit Committee member independence criteria under applicable SEC rules; (ii) is independent, as independence for Audit Committee members is defined under applicable NASDAQ listing standards; and (iii) has sufficient knowledge, experience and sophistication in financial and auditing matters under relevant SEC and NASDAQ rules.  The satisfaction of these factors results in each such individual’s financial sophistication under NASDAQ Rule 5605(c)(2)(A) and qualifies each such individual as an “audit committee financial expert,” under Item 407(d)(5)(ii) of SEC Regulation S-K.  The Board has designated Mr. Kramer as our Audit Committee financial expert.

Financial Reporting. The Company has always received an unqualified opinion from its auditor, has never restated its financials, and has never been untimely in its financial disclosure filings.

Report of the Audit Committee.  In performing its duties, the Audit Committee, as required by applicable rules of the SEC, issues a report recommending to the Board that our audited financial statements be included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K and determines certain other matters, including the independence of our independent registered public accounting firm.  The Report of the Audit Committee for 2021 is set forth below.

The primary purpose of the Audit Committee of the Board of Covenant Logistics Group, Inc. (the “Company”) is to assist the Board in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities relating to the quality and integrity of the Company’s financial reports, financial reporting processes, and systems of internal control over financial reporting.  The Audit Committee does not prepare financial statements or perform audits, and its members are not auditors or certifiers of the Company’s financial statements. Rather, the Company’s management has primary responsibility for the preparation, consistency, integrity, and fair presentation of the Company’s financial statements and the overall reporting process, including maintenance of the Company’s system of internal controls. The Audit Committee is responsible for the appointment, evaluation, compensation, retention, and oversight of the work of the Company’s independent registered accounting firm. Grant Thornton LLP (“Grant Thornton”) was the Company’s independent registered accounting firm for the year ended December 31, 2021.  Grant Thornton was responsible for conducting independent quarterly reviews and an independent annual audit of the Company’s financial statements and internal control over financial reporting in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”) and issuing a report thereon.

For the year ended December 31, 2021, the Audit Committee has (i) reviewed and discussed the audited financial statements, management’s assessment of internal control over financial reporting, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting with management and Grant Thornton; (ii) discussed with Grant Thornton the matters required to be discussed pursuant to Auditing Standard No. 1301 (Communications with Audit Committees) issued by the PCAOB; (iii) received and reviewed the written disclosures and the letter from Grant Thornton required by applicable requirements of the PCAOB regarding Grant Thornton’s communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence; and (iv) discussed with Grant Thornton its independence as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm and auditor. The Audit Committee, in issuing this report, has relied upon the responses and information provided to the Audit Committee by management and Grant Thornton. The Audit Committee met in periodic executive sessions with each of Grant Thornton, management, and the internal audit department during 2021.

Based on the foregoing reviews and meetings, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board that the audited financial statements be included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021, for filing with the SEC.

Functions, Composition, and Meetings of the Compensation Committee. As more fully outlined in the Compensation Committee charter, the primary functions of the Compensation Committee of our Board are to aid our Board in discharging its responsibilities relating to the compensation of our executive officers, including the CEO; evaluate and approve our compensation plans, policies, and programs for executive officers; produce an annual report on executive compensation; make recommendations to the Board on matters of Chairman of the Board, CEO, and President succession; and perform such other duties as may be assigned to it by our Board or imposed by applicable laws or regulations.  In furtherance of its duties, the Compensation Committee reviews and approves the elements of the compensation of our executive officers and our overall executive compensation strategy to ensure such components align with our business objectives, responsible corporate practices, and our stockholders’ interests.  The Compensation Committee also makes recommendations on other compensation matters to the full Board.  The Compensation Committee has the authority to carry out the foregoing responsibilities under its charter, and may delegate such authority to subcommittees of the Compensation Committee. Our Compensation Committee is comprised of Messrs. Welborn, Bosworth, and Kramer. Mr. Welborn serves as Chair of the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee met 9 times during 2021.

CEO Evaluation and Performance Results. Our CEO undergoes a thorough annual assessment and evaluation conducted by outside counsel.  This assessment evaluates our CEO’s performance in light of relevant corporate goals and objectives, with inquiries in strategic planning, financial results, capital allocation, succession planning, human resources, leadership, management, and other areas.

Compensation Committee Independence.  While serving on the Compensation Committee, each member satisfied the independence and Compensation Committee membership criteria set forth in NASDAQ Rule 5605(d)(2)(A) and applicable SEC regulations.  In determining the independence of our Compensation Committee members, the Board considered several relevant factors, including but not limited to each director’s source of compensation and affiliations. Specifically, while serving on the Compensation Committee, each member of the Compensation Committee:

Compensation Committee Charter.  Our Compensation Committee operates pursuant to a written charter detailing its purpose, powers, and duties.  The Compensation Committee reviews and reassesses the adequacy of its formal written charter on an annual basis and recommends changes to the Board when appropriate.  The charter is publicly available free of charge on our website, www.covenantlogistics.com, under the “Governance” tab of the “Resources - Investors” menu.

Report of the Compensation Committee.  In performing its duties, the Compensation Committee, as required by applicable rules and regulations promulgated by the SEC, issues a report recommending to the Board that our Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this Proxy Statement. The Report of the Compensation Committee for 2021 follows.

The Report of the Compensation Committee shall not be deemed to be “soliciting material” or to otherwise be considered “filed” with the SEC, nor shall this report be subject to Regulation 14A or Regulation 14C (other than as indicated) or to the liabilities set forth in Section 18 of the Exchange Act.  This Compensation Committee Report also shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any prior or subsequent filing with the SEC made by us under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, notwithstanding any general statement contained in any such filings incorporating this Proxy Statement by reference, except to the extent we incorporate such report by specific reference or treat it as soliciting material.

The Compensation Committee of the Board of Covenant Logistics Group, Inc. (the “Company”) has reviewed and discussed with management the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section (as required by Item 402(b) of Regulation S-K of the SEC) contained in this Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on May 18, 2022. Based on that review and discussion, the Compensation Committee recommended to the Board that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section be included in this Proxy Statement and incorporated by reference into the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021.

Messrs. Welborn, Bosworth, and Kramer served on the Compensation Committee during 2021. Messrs. Welborn, Bosworth, and Kramer were not officers or employees of the Company at any time during 2021 or as of the date of this Proxy Statement, nor was any such individual a former officer of the Company. In 2021, no member of our Compensation Committee had any relationship or transaction with the Company that would require disclosure as a “related person transaction” under Item 404 of SEC Regulation S-K in this Proxy Statement under the section entitled Certain Relationships and Related Transactions.

During 2021, none of our executive officers served as a member of the board of directors or Compensation Committee (or other board committee performing equivalent functions) of another entity, one of whose executive officers served on our Compensation Committee.  Additionally, during 2021, none of our executive officers served as a member of the Compensation Committee (or other board committee performing equivalent functions) of another entity, one of whose executive officers served as a member of our Board or Compensation Committee.

See Certain Relationships and Related Transactions for a description of certain transactions between us and our other directors, executive officers, or their affiliates, and Executive Compensation – Director Compensation for a description of compensation of the members of the Compensation Committee.

Functions, Composition, and Meetings of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee.  Our Nominating Committee recommends to the Board potential director nominee candidates for election to the Board and makes recommendations to the Board concerning issues related to corporate governance, as further detailed in the Nominating Committee charter discussed below. Our Nominating Committee is also responsible for overseeing our information security. Our Nominating Committee is comprised of Messrs. Moline, Carson, and Schmidt. Mr. Moline serves as chair of the Nominating Committee. All current members of the Nominating Committee are independent, as independence for Nominating Committee members is defined under applicable SEC regulations and NASDAQ listing standards.  The Nominating Committee met 6 times in 2021.  In selecting the slate of directors for 2022, the Nominating Committee considered the skillsets and qualifications of the current directors, particularly in the areas of technology, industry experience, and diversity. The Nominating Committee has recommended that the Board nominate Messrs. Parker, Bosworth, Carson, Kramer, Schmidt, Moline, and Welborn, and Ms. Parker-Hatchett, for election at the Annual Meeting, each of whom is currently serving as a director.

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee Charter. Our Nominating Committee operates pursuant to a written charter detailing its purpose, powers, and duties.  The Nominating Committee periodically reviews its formal written charter, as well as those of our Board committees, to ensure each charter reflects a commitment to effective corporate governance and recommends changes to the Board when appropriate. A copy of the charter (which includes Exhibit A (Criteria for Board of Directors) to such charter, as mentioned below) is available free of charge on our website, www.covenantlogistics.com, under the “Governance” tab of the “Resources - Investors” menu.

Process for Identifying and Evaluating Director Nominees. Director nominees are chosen by the entire Board, after considering the recommendations of the Nominating Committee.  The members of the Nominating Committee review the qualifications of various persons to determine whether they are qualified director nominee candidates for membership on the Board.  The Nominating Committee will review all such candidate recommendations, including those properly submitted by stockholders, in accordance with the requirements of its charter, SEC regulations, and NASDAQ listing standards.  Upon identifying and selecting qualified director nominee candidates, the Nominating Committee then submits its director nominee selections to our Board for consideration. We do not pay a fee to any third party to identify or evaluate or assist in identifying or evaluating potential nominees.

Desirable Traits for Director Nominees. With regard to specific qualities and skills of potential director nominees, the Nominating Committee believes it is necessary that: (i) at least a majority of the members of the Board qualify as “independent” under NASDAQ Rule 5605(a)(2); (ii) at least three members of the Board satisfy the Audit Committee membership criteria specified in NASDAQ Rule 5605(c)(2)(A); (iii) at least one member of the Board eligible to serve on the Audit Committee has sufficient knowledge, experience, and training concerning accounting and financial matters so as to be financially sophisticated under NASDAQ Rule 5605(c)(2)(A) and qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert” within the meaning of Item 407(d)(5)(ii) of SEC Regulation S-K; and (iv) at least two members of the Board satisfy the Compensation Committee membership criteria specified in NASDAQ Rule 5605(d)(2)(A).  In addition to these specific requirements, the Nominating Committee takes into account all factors it considers appropriate, which may include, but are not limited to, an individual’s experience, accomplishments, education, understanding of our business and the industry in which we operate, specific skills, general business acumen, diversity, and personal and professional integrity.  Exhibit A (Criteria for Board of Directors) of the Nominating Committee charter also sets forth various factors and criteria used for selecting director nominees (such factors and criteria are not absolute prerequisites for any such nominee). Generally, the Nominating Committee will first consider current Board members as potential director nominees because they meet the criteria listed above and possess knowledge of our history, strengths, weaknesses, goals, and objectives.

Annual Board Self-Assessment. The Nominating Committee is responsible for developing and implementing a director evaluation program to measure the individual and collective performance of directors and the fulfillment of their responsibilities to our stockholders, including an assessment of the Board’s compliance with applicable corporate governance requirements and identification of areas in which the Board might improve its performance.  The Nominating Committee also is responsible for developing and implementing an annual self-evaluation process for the Board designed to assure that directors contribute to our corporate governance and to our performance.  These tasks are accomplished in part through our written annual Board evaluation questionnaire in which our independent directors assess and comment on various issues concerning the Board’s and each committee’s performance, oversight, resources, composition, culture, and committees. Questionnaire responses are anonymously compiled and summarized in a report distributed to the Board by outside counsel. The responses are analyzed by the Nominating Committee and discussed with the Board. Outside counsel monitors resulting action items, to ensure that identified issues are addressed by the Board or the appropriate committee of the Board. The Nominating Committee periodically reviews the self-assessment process. We believe the self-assessment process provides valuable constructive feedback that contributes to the Board’s overall effectiveness, functionality, and oversight.

Board Diversity. In recommending director nominee candidates for the Board, the Nominating Committee considers Board diversity along with the various other factors discussed above.  Our Nominating Committee does not have a formal policy with respect to diversity, but considers it desirable if potential nominees complement and contribute to the Board’s overall diversity and composition.  The last two additions to the Board have been diversity directors. Pursuant to the Nominating Committee’s charter, such consideration includes each individual candidate’s ability to enhance differences of viewpoint, professional experience, education, skills, and other individual qualities among the members of the Board. Diversity is not limited solely to gender, race and ethnicity distinctions, and we interpret diversity to encompass an individual’s ability to positively contribute to the chemistry and collaborative nature of our Board, as well as such person’s personal and professional experiences, aptitude, and expertise relevant to our industry. In addition, the Nominating Committee will consider the diversity criteria set forth in NASDAQ Rule 5605(f) for director nominee candidates going forward to ensure compliance with such rule by the deadlines specified therein. Currently, our Board includes one self-identified female director and one self-identified underrepresented minority director within the definition of NASDAQ Rule 5605(f), satisfying the diversity requirements of such rule. The Nominating Committee periodically reviews and assesses the effectiveness of the Committee’s policies with respect to its consideration of diversity in identifying director nominees.

Stockholder Director Nominee Recommendations.  Outside of the proxy access provision of our Bylaws, described above, it is generally the policy of the Nominating Committee to consider stockholder recommendations of proposed director nominees if such recommendations are serious, timely received, and comply with SEC rules and regulations setting forth the requirements for the inclusion of stockholder proposals in company-sponsored proxy materials, specifically Rule 14a-8 of the Exchange Act.  To be timely, recommendations must be received in writing by Joey Hogan at our principal executive office at least 120 days prior to the one-year anniversary of the mailing date of our proxy statement for the prior year’s Annual Meeting of Stockholders. For our 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, all stockholder recommendations of proposed director nominees must be received in writing by Joey Hogan no later than the close of business on December 17, 2022. Such stockholder recommendations should be addressed and sent to Joey Hogan, President; Covenant Logistics Group, Inc.; 400 Birmingham Highway; Chattanooga, Tennessee 37419. In addition, any stockholder director nominee recommendation must include the following information:

Oversight over Information Security. The Nominating Committee, which is comprised solely of independent directors, has oversight over our information security. The Board receives regular updates from senior executives on technology initiatives.  We believe Messrs. Kramer, Carson, and Moline have relevant experience in information security. Mr. Kramer previously served as the Chief Technology Officer of Integra Bank Corporation. Mr. Carson previously served as Secretary of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development and held numerous leadership positions at prestigious institutions in the medical field.  Mr. Moline has served in senior leadership roles at various telecommunications companies. Highlights of our information security include:

Functions, Composition, and Meetings of the Risk Committee. The Risk Committee was established in February 2022.  Our Risk Committee aids the Board in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities relating to the identification, evaluation, and mitigation of operational, strategic, and external environment risks. Our Risk Committee is responsible for monitoring and reviewing, with management, the Company’s risk framework, including, but not limited to, the adequacy and effectiveness of the Company’s risk management policies, safety initiatives, business continuation, and enterprise risk management program. Our Risk Committee reviews whether the Company is taking appropriate measures to achieve a prudent balance between risk and reward in both ongoing and new business and strategic activities.  Our Risk Committee is comprised of Messrs. Schmidt and Carson, and Ms. Parker-Hatchett. Mr. Schmidt serves as chair of the Risk Committee. Our Risk Committee shall meet at least two times per year.

Risk Committee Charter. Our Risk Committee operates pursuant to a written charter detailing its purpose, powers, and duties.  The Risk Committee periodically reviews its formal written charter and recommends changes to the Board when appropriate. A copy of the charter is available free of charge on our website, www.covenantlogistics.com, under the “Governance” tab of the “Resources - Investors” menu.

Set forth below is certain information regarding our current executive officers (other than our CEO, Mr. Parker, for whom information is set forth above under Proposal 1 – Election of Directors), as well as other members of senior management. All executive officers are elected annually by the Board.  Family relationships between any directors and executive officers, if any, are noted in the relevant biographies.  All references to experience with us include positions with our operating subsidiaries and none of the other corporations or organizations referenced in the biographies is a parent, subsidiary, or affiliate of the Company unless otherwise noted.  There are no arrangements or understandings between any of the executive officers and any other person pursuant to which any of the executive officers was or is to be selected as an officer.  Each of the executive officers also has consented to being identified as such in this Proxy Statement and has indicated his intention to serve in his respective office, if elected by the Board.

Joey B. Hogan, 60, has been our President and Principal Financial Officer (“PFO”) since April 2021. Previously, Mr. Hogan served as our Co-President and Chief Administrative Officer (“CAO”) from April 2020 to April 2021 and as our President and COO from February 2016 to April 2020. From May 2007 to February 2016 Mr. Hogan served as our Senior EVP and COO, as well as President of Covenant Transport, Inc. (“CTI”). Mr. Hogan was our CFO from 1997 to May 2007, our EVP from May 2003 to May 2007, and a Senior Vice President (“SVP”) from December 2001 to May 2003. From joining us in August 1997 through December 2001, Mr. Hogan served as our Treasurer. Mr. Hogan served as a director and on the Audit Committee of previously publicly traded Chattem, Inc., a consumer products company, from April 2009 through March 2010, and currently serves as an officer of the Truckload Carriers Association.

M. Paul Bunn, 44, has been our Senior EVP, COO, and Secretary since April 2021.  Mr. Bunn previously served as our EVP, CFO, and Secretary form April 2020 to April 2021, our EVP and CAO from April 2019 to April 2020, our Chief Accounting Officer and Treasurer from January 2012 to April 2020, and our SVP from 2017 to April 2019. Previously, Mr. Bunn served as our Corporate Controller from July 2009 to January 2012. Prior to that, Mr. Bunn served as an Audit Senior Manager for Ernst & Young, LLP, a global professional services provider.

Lynn Doster, 56, has been our EVP - Dedicated Operations since March 2021 and was our SVP of Operations from April 2020 to February 2021. Ms. Doster joined the Company in July 2018 following our acquisition of Landair Holdings Inc. (“Landair”).  At Landair, Ms. Doster was previously the SVP of Operations, a position she held since joining the organization in 2013. Prior to joining the Company, Ms. Doster achieved increasing levels of operational responsibilities in her 14 year career with Penske Logistics, a global third-party logistics provider, four of which she served in the role of Vice President of Operations.

James “Tripp” S. Grant, 43, joined the Company as the Corporate Controller in July 2019 and was promoted to Chief Accounting Officer in September 2020.  Mr. Grant has served as the Company’s principal accounting officer since August 2019. Previously, Mr. Grant worked at Chattem, Inc., from August 2007 to June 2019, during which time he served in the following roles: Director, Corporate Projects, Corporate Controller and Assistant Controller.  Prior to Chattem, Mr. Grant served as a Senior Internal Auditor at Electric Power Board of Chattanooga, an electric power distribution and telecommunications company from January 2006 to August 2007, and a Senior Accountant at Neal, Scouten & McConnell, P.C. from August 2002 to January 2006.

Samuel “Sam” F. Hough, 56, has been our EVP - Expedited Operations since September 2020. Mr. Hough served as our EVP - Highway Services between April 2020 and September 2020. Previously Mr. Hough served as EVP and COO of CTI since joining us in February 2013. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Hough served as Vice President of Sales from 2010 – 2013, Vice President of Regional Operations from 2009 - 2010, and Vice President of Revenue Management from 2006 - 2009 for Conway Truckload, Inc., a freight transportation provider operating in the United States, Canada, and Mexico.

Joey Ballard, 47, has been our SVP of Talent Management since April 2019. Ms. Ballard joined the Company in July 2018 following the Landair Acquisition and previously was the Senior Director of Talent Management at Landair. Prior to joining the Company, Ms. Ballard served in various roles at Landair since 1999. Ms. Ballard is a board member of Greeneville Community Hospital (Ballard Health) and actively involved in other community organizations.

Matisse Long, 46, joined the Company as the Corporate Controller in June 2021. Mr. Long is a co-founder and director of Advisory Information Technology, LLC (“AdIT”), a division of Mauldin & Jenkins, LLC. At AdIT, Mr. Long has overseen many of the division’s advisory, accounting, and informational technology responsibilities. Mr. Long is a Certified Public Accountant with over 21 years of experience in private and public accounting, with extensive experience in transportation. Mr. Long was previously the practice leader of Windham Brannon, PC’s advisory services practice.

Daniel B. Porterfield, 49, has served as our SVP of Maintenance and Equipment Control since September 2021 and as SVP of Maintenance since July 2019. Previously, Mr. Porterfield has served as the Breakdown Manager, the Shop Manager, and the Director of Maintenance. From April 2015 to July 2019, Mr. Porterfield served as VP of Maintenance. Mr. Porterfield has been with the Company since December 1995.

Our Board has adopted a Code of Conduct and Ethics that applies to all directors, officers, and employees, whether with us or one of our subsidiaries.  The Code of Conduct and Ethics includes provisions applicable to our CEO, CFO, Chief Accounting Officer, controller, or persons performing similar functions and that collectively constitute a “code of ethics” within the meaning of Item 406(b) of SEC Regulation S‑K.  A copy of the Code of Conduct and Ethics is publicly available free of charge on our website, www.covenantlogistics.com, under the “Governance” tab of the “Resources - Investors” menu.

Pursuant to SEC regulations and NASDAQ listing standards, we will disclose amendments to or waivers of our Code of Conduct and Ethics in a press release, on our website, www.covenantlogistics.com, or in a Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC, whichever disclosure method is appropriate. To date, we have not granted any waivers from our Code of Conduct and Ethics to the CEO, CFO, Chief Accounting Officer, Controller, or any person performing similar functions.

This Proxy Statement section identifies our Named Executive Officers (as designated below) and explains how our executive compensation programs, policies and decisions are formulated, applied, and operate with respect to the Named Executive Officers.  In the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, we also discuss and analyze our executive compensation program, including each component of compensation awarded under the program, and the corresponding compensation amounts for each Named Executive Officer.

This Compensation Discussion and Analysis should be read in conjunction with the Summary Compensation Table (including the related tabular and narrative discussions) and the Committees of the Board of Directors – The Compensation Committee section contained in this Proxy Statement.  As noted in that section, our Compensation Committee, which for 2021 was comprised only of directors who satisfy applicable SEC and NASDAQ independence requirements, oversees and administers our executive compensation policies and practices.

For 2021, we generated over $1 billion in revenue, the highest annual earnings per share in our history, and a 13% return on average invested capital.  We also were successful in moving assets to longer term customer arrangements, lowering our asset intensity and reducing our debt. These achievements were made possible by the hard work and dedication of all of our employees, inlcuding our Named Executive Officers.

In designing our 2021 compensation plan, the Compensation Committee considered that our say-on-on pay resolution at the 2021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders was approved with approximately 98.8% of the votes cast. For 2021, the Compensation Committee aligned pay with performance through short-term cash incentive programs with corporate and divisional goals, as well as performance-based option grants to certain Named Executive Officers.

The Company adheres to the following practices and policies with respect to our executive compensation programs:

For the year ended December 31, 2021, our named executive officers (collectively, the “Named Executive Officers”) were as follows:

The Compensation Committee of our Board oversees all of our executive officer compensation arrangements.  The Compensation Committee has the specific responsibility to (i) review and approve corporate goals and objectives relevant to the compensation of our CEO, (ii) evaluate the performance of our CEO in light of those goals and objectives, including through the annual CEO assessment, and (iii) determine and approve the compensation level of our CEO based upon that evaluation. The Compensation Committee also has the responsibility to review annually the compensation of our other executive officers and to determine whether such compensation is reasonable under existing facts and circumstances. In making such determinations, the Compensation Committee seeks to ensure that the compensation of our executive officers aligns the executive officers’ interests with the interests of our stockholders.  The Compensation Committee also reviews and approves all forms of deferred compensation and incentive compensation, including annual cash bonuses, stock option grants, stock grants, and other forms of incentive compensation granted to our executive officers.  The Compensation Committee takes into account the recommendations of our CEO and our President in reviewing and approving the overall compensation of the other executive officers (but not with respect to their own compensation).

The Compensation Committee has the authority under its charter to retain outside consultants as it deems appropriate.  In accordance with this authority, the Compensation Committee engaged Willis Towers Watson to provide independent and unbiased external advice and expertise regarding executive compensation and to provide a competitive market pay analysis for our Named Executive Officers.  The Compensation Committee used this advice and information as a guide in reviewing our executive compensation program, including with respect to the setting of base salaries and grants of equity awards to our executive officers.

At the most senior level, including our Named Executive Officers, we seek to attract, motivate, and retain executive officers who are capable of evaluating, building, and managing multiple businesses, and who we believe will create long-term value for our stockholders. In this regard, we use a mix of compensation designed to provide overall compensation levels that (i) are sufficient to attract and retain talented executive officers and to motivate those executives to achieve superior results, (ii) align executives’ interests with our corporate strategies, our business objectives, and the performance of specific business units to the extent applicable, (iii) enhance executives’ incentives to increase our stock price and focus on the long-term interests of our stockholders, and (iv) are consistent with our goal of controlling costs. In many instances we build our compensation elements around long-term retention and development together with annual rewards based on financial performance.

Our compensation program for senior executive officers has two major elements, fixed compensation and incentive compensation. The total compensation for senior executive officers, including the Named Executive Officers, consists of the following five components:

The Compensation Committee has the responsibility to make and approve changes in the total compensation of our executive officers, including the mix of compensation elements. In making decisions regarding an executive officer’s total compensation, the Compensation Committee considers whether total compensation:

The Compensation Committee also takes into consideration the following:

In determining the mix of compensation elements, the Compensation Committee considers the effect of each element in relation to total compensation.  Consistent with our need to control costs and our desire to recognize our executive officers’ performance where such recognition is warranted, the Compensation Committee has attempted to weight overall compensation toward incentive and equity based compensation. Accordingly, a substantial part of the compensation package for each executive officer is at risk and is only earned if our performance and the performance of the executive officer so warrants. Moreover, the entire amount of the equity-based incentive is subject to fluctuations in our stock price, in alignment with the exposure of our stockholders, so our executives experience both upside and downside exposure. The Compensation Committee specifically considers whether each particular element provides an appropriate incentive and reward for performance that sustains and enhances long-term stockholder value. The Compensation Committee also takes into account the tax and accounting consequences associated with each element of compensation.

In determining whether to increase or decrease an element of compensation, we rely upon the business experience of the members of the Compensation Committee, the Compensation Committee’s general understanding of compensation levels of public companies, the historical compensation levels of the executive officers and, in certain years, information provided by compensation consultants. We generally do not rely on short-term changes in business performance when setting compensation, nor do we have a formal policy regarding the percentage allocated between cash and non-cash compensation or current versus long-term compensation.  Rather, the Compensation Committee adjusts these factors as our needs and goals change.

We pay base salaries at levels that reward executive officers for ongoing performance and that enable us to attract and retain highly qualified executive officers.  Base pay is a critical element of our compensation program because it provides our executive officers with stability. Compensation stability allows our executive officers to focus their attention and efforts on creating stockholder value and on our other business objectives.  In determining base salaries, we consider:

The base salaries of our executive officers will differ based upon these factors.  Market adjustments to executive officer base salaries may also be made when a significant change occurs to an executive officer’s position or responsibilities or if comparative market data indicates a significant deviation compared to market salary practices. The total base salaries earned by each of our Named Executive Officers in 2021 are disclosed in the Summary Compensation Table.

The Covenant Logistics Group, Inc. Third Amended and Restated 2006 Omnibus Incentive Plan, as amended (the “Incentive Plan”), is a broad-based cash and equity incentive plan. Long-term incentives under the Incentive Plan are typically granted as equity awards.  We use equity awards, among other things, to:

The Incentive Plan allows the Compensation Committee to link compensation to performance over a period of time by using equity-based awards (which often value a company’s long-term prospects), requiring holding periods for equity grants, and granting awards that have multiple-year vesting schedules. Awards with multiple-year vesting schedules, such as restricted stock grants, provide balance to the other elements of our compensation program that otherwise link compensation to annual performance. Awards with multiple-year vesting schedules create incentive for executive officers to increase stockholder value over an extended period of time because the value received from such awards is based on the growth of the stock price.  Such awards also incentivize executive officers to remain with us over an extended period of time, which enables us to retain experienced executive talent. Thus, we believe our Incentive Plan is an effective way of aligning the interests of our executive officers with those of our stockholders.

In determining our long-term incentive compensation, our Compensation Committee evaluates which award vehicles achieve the best balance between providing appropriate long-term incentive compensation and creating long-term stockholder value. The Compensation Committee considers several factors when determining long-term incentive awards to be granted to our executive officers, including:

Please refer to the Summary Compensation Table and Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table for further details regarding long-term incentives awarded to our Named Executive Officers.

The Compensation Committee uses performance-based annual cash bonuses to provide motivation for the executives to produce positive results in the expected business environment for the year. These performance-based annual bonuses are based on the executives’ completion of annual bonus targets established by the Compensation Committee. Performance-based annual cash bonuses typically encourage and reward executive officers for performance during the fiscal year and on a short-term basis.  We believe our performance-based bonuses also contribute to our long-term success because such bonuses motivate and reward achievement of strategic and financial goals that are judged by the Compensation Committee to reflect desirable targets.

When calculating the cash bonus earned by an executive officer under the Incentive Plan, the Compensation Committee may, in its sole judgment, exercise negative discretion to eliminate or reduce the size of a bonus if the Compensation Committee determines such action is appropriate, but may not increase a bonus above the executive’s maximum cash bonus actually earned based on achievement of the objective performance criteria. Further, the Compensation Committee is required to certify, prior to payment of a cash bonus under the Incentive Plan, that the respective performance targets underlying the cash bonus were achieved.

Our short-term cash incentive plans for 2021 are described under Executive Compensation – Compensation Discussion and Analysis – Compensation Paid to Our Named Executive Officers – 2021 Bonus Programs.

We provide our Named Executive Officers with certain other benefits, which include perquisites, that we believe are reasonable, competitive, and consistent with our overall executive compensation program. The costs of these benefits constitute only a small percentage of each executive’s total compensation. In setting the amount of these benefits, the Compensation Committee considers each executive’s position and scope of responsibilities and all other elements comprising the executive’s compensation. The aggregate incremental cost of perquisites and other benefits provided to our Named Executive Officers is shown in the “All Other Compensation” column of the Summary Compensation Table and detailed in the All Other Compensation Table.

Our executive officers are eligible to participate in all of our employee benefit plans, such as our 401(k) plan and medical, dental, and group life insurance plans, in each case on the same basis as our other employees.  We believe our benefits are competitive compared to those offered by similar companies in our general transportation industry and other comparable publicly traded truckload carriers.

Mr. Parker founded Covenant Transport, Inc. in 1985 with 25 tractors and 50 trailers and has been our chief executive since our inception.  We have achieved considerable growth in revenue since our inception and now serve as the holding company for several transportation providers that in the aggregate operate approximately 2,291 tractors and 5,331 trailers (as of December 31, 2021) and offer premium transportation services for customers throughout the United States.

During 2021, Mr. Parker was eligible for the following compensation:

In 2021, the form and amount of compensation for our Named Executive Officers was recommended by our Messrs. Parker and Hogan, provided that Messrs. Parker and Hogan did not recommend their own compensation.  The form and amount of compensation for Mr. Hogan was recommended by Mr. Parker. As discussed above, the Compensation Committee relied on the business experience of its members, the historical compensation levels of the Named Executive Officers, its general understanding of compensation levels at public companies, and the report of Willis Towers Watson, to determine that such recommendations with respect to the compensation levels and forms were appropriate for 2021.

During 2021, Mr. Hogan was eligible for the following compensation:

During 2021, Mr. Bunn was eligible for the following compensation:

During 2021, Ms. Doster was eligible for the following compensation:

During 2021, Mr. Grant was eligible for the following compensation:

During 2021, Mr. Hough was eligible for the following compensation:

During 2021, Mr. Tweed was eligible for the following compensation until his transition to a consultant, effective July 3, 2021:

See “Mr. Tweed’s Separation” below for details regarding the benefits Mr. Tweed received related to his separation.

Under the 2021 Senior Executive Bonus Program, Messrs. Parker, Hogan, and Bunn were eligible to receive incremental cash bonuses upon satisfaction of certain goals related to adjusted earnings per share (“Adjusted EPS”), leadership structure, safety, and productivity, over a performance period of January 1, 2021 to December 31, 2021.

The Adjusted EPS goal was $1.40 for fiscal year 2021. Upon attainment of the Adjusted EPS, each of the participants would receive 100% of their bonus target and become eligible to earn up to an additional 100% of their bonus target based on achievement of the following goals:

The annual bonus targets, expressed as a percentage of year-end annualized base salary, under the 2021 Senior Executive Bonus Program were as follows:

In February 2022, the Compensation Committee determined that the following goals were met: Adjusted EPS ($3.61 Adjusted EPS for fiscal year 2021), leadership structure, and productivity at the 17% level (96.5% average Dedicated adjusted operating ratio after corporate overhead allocation for the last four months of 2021), resulting in the following payouts under the 2021 Senior Executive Bonus Program:

Under the 2021 Doster Bonus Program, Ms. Doster was eligible to receive an incremental cash bonus upon satisfaction of certain goals related to Dedicated adjusted operating ratio for the last four months of fiscal year 2021 Adjusted EPS for fiscal year 2021. Ms. Doster’s annual bonus target, expressed as a percentage of year-end annualized base salary, was 50%. Ms. Doster could earn (i) 37.5% of her target bonus if Dedicated adjusted operating ratio was at or below 97% or less after corporate overhead allocation for the last four months of fiscal year 2021 or (ii) 75% of her bonus target if Dedicated adjusted operating ratio was at or below 95% or less after corporate overhead allocation for the last four months of fiscal year 2021. Ms. Doster could earn up to 50% of her bonus target based on Adjusted EPS for fiscal year 2021, as follows:

In February 2022, the Compensation Committee determined that the Dedicated adjusted operating ratio for the last four months of fiscal year 2021 was 96.5% and Adjusted EPS for fiscal year 2021 was $3.61, resulting in a payout to Ms. Doster of $135,190.

Under the 2021 Grant Bonus Program, Mr. Grant was eligible to receive an incremental cash bonus upon satisfaction of certain goals related to corporate accounting department expenses as a percentage of budget for fiscal year 2021 (weighted at 25%) and adjusted earnings per share for fiscal year 2021 (weighted at 75%). Mr. Grant’s annual bonus target, expressed as a percentage of year-end annualized base salary, was 40%. The target bonus is multiplied by the level of achievement of the corporate accounting department expenses as a percentage of budget and adjusted earnings per share goals, as follows:

In February 2022, the Compensation Committee determined that the corporate accounting department expenses as a percentage of budget for fiscal year 2021 was 100% and Adjusted EPS for fiscal year 2021 was $3.61, resulting in a payout to Mr. Grant of $153,244.

Under the 2021 Hough Bonus Program, Mr. Hough was eligible to receive an incremental cash bonus upon satisfaction of certain goals related to Expedited gross margin for fiscal year 2021 (weighted at 75%) and adjusted earnings per share for fiscal year 2021 (weighted at 25%). Mr. Hough’s annual bonus target, expressed as a percentage of year-end annualized base salary, was 50%. The target bonus is multiplied by the level of achievement of the Expedited gross margin and adjusted earnings per share goals, as follows:

In February 2022, the Compensation Committee determined that the Expedited gross margin for fiscal year 2021 was $69.1 million and Adjusted EPS for fiscal year 2021 was $3.61, resulting in a payout to Mr. Hough of $355,160.

On April 6, 2021, the Compensation Committee approved grants of performance-based options to purchase the Company’s Class A common stock (“Options”) to Messrs. Parker and Bunn, as follows:

The 2021 Market Condition Options will vest if the closing price of the Company’s Class A common stock is at or above $30.00 for at least 90 consecutive trading days before December 31, 2023, but in no event sooner than April 6, 2022.

The 2021 Performance Condition Options will vest as follows:

The vesting of the Options is subject to certain continued employment, acceleration, and forfeiture provisions.  The Options have an exercise price equal to $21.24 per share (the closing market price of our Class A common stock on the grant date) and a 10-year term.

In January 2021, we announced that Mr. Tweed would transition to a consulting role effective July 3, 2021. In connection with the transition, the Company entered into an amended and restated executive severance agreement (the “Amended Severance Agreement”) with Mr. Tweed, as well as a short-term consulting agreement (the “Consulting Agreement”). Mr. Tweed’s final day of employment was July 3, 2021 and the Consulting Agreement was effective July 4, 2021.

The Amended Severance Agreement provides for (i) certain benefits in the case of Mr. Tweed’s termination before July 3, 2021, (ii) certain non-competition and non-solicitation provisions, effective during the term of Mr. Tweed’s employment and continuing until the earlier of July 4, 2021 or the effectiveness of the Consulting Agreement, and (iii) an award of 50,000 shares of Class A restricted stock, to vest on the earlier of January 25, 2022 or the date his employment or engagement by the Company was terminated in connection with a change-in-control of the Company.

Pursuant to the Consulting Agreement, (i) Mr. Tweed will provide certain consulting services to the Company from July 4, 2021 through December 31, 2022, unless the Consulting Agreement is earlier terminated by the Company as provided in the Consulting Agreement (the “Consulting Term”), (ii) during the Consulting Term, the Company will pay to Mr. Tweed $128,000 per quarter for Mr. Tweed being available to provide consulting services for a minimum of 25 days per quarter, (iii) during the Consulting Term, Mr. Tweed has continued Corporate Aircraft Use and group health insurance benefits, and (iv) Mr. Tweed agreed to certain non-solicitation provisions during the Term and through the earlier of June 30, 2023 or one year following the termination of the Consulting Agreement.

The Compensation Committee annually reviews and considers adjustments to the base salaries of our Named Executive Officers, as well as grants of annual cash incentives and equity awards to each Named Executive Officer.

In February 2022, the Compensation Committee, approved a short-term cash incentive plan for the continuing named executive officers (the “2022 Senior Executive Bonus Program”). Under the 2022 Senior Executive Bonus Program, the bonus targets, expressed as a percentage of year-end annualized base salary, were the same as under the 2021 Bonus Programs, except Mr. Bunn’s bonus target was changed from 80% to 85% of year-end annualized base salary in recognition of his recent performance and leadership. Under the 2022 Senior Executive Bonus Program, participants are eligible to earn up to 150% of their bonus target upon the attainment of certain Adjusted EPS goals and up to 25% of their bonus target upon the attainment of a certain projects relating to business growth, safety, and division operating ratio.

In February 2022, the Compensation Committee also approved a $50,000 cash bonus to Ms. Doster in recognition of her promotion to EVP – Dedicated Operations, as well as Dedicated’s ongoing performance.

We do not formally benchmark our executive compensation against the executive compensation of any other particular company or competitive peer group of companies.  The Compensation Committee, from time to time, has considered the forms and levels of compensation disclosed by other comparable publicly traded truckload carriers, certain other transportation companies, and companies of similar size and market capitalization generally in order to obtain a broad understanding of such companies’ compensation practices.

We believe our compensation policies and practices for executive and non-executive employees create appropriate and meaningful incentives for our employees and avoid excessive or inappropriate risks. Our Compensation Committee assesses the risks that could arise from such policies and practices by reviewing the various elements and aspects of our compensation, including base salaries, incentive compensation (which has historically included long-term equity awards and performance-based annual bonuses), perquisites, employee benefits, and other compensation. Upon concluding such assessment, the Compensation Committee determined that our compensation policies and practices do not create risks that are reasonably likely to have a materially adverse impact on the Company. In making this determination, our Compensation Committee primarily considered the following factors:

Each of our Named Executive Officers is employed at will and does not have an employment agreement.

Under certain circumstances in which there is a change in control, certain outstanding unvested restricted stock and stock options granted to recipients, including Named Executive Officers, under the Incentive Plan and our predecessor plans may become vested upon the occurrence of such event, notwithstanding that such restricted shares or stock options may not have otherwise been fully vested.  The Second Amendment to the Incentive Plan requires that equity awards granted after the effectiveness of the amendment in July 2020 include a double trigger provision, which provides for the payment, or acceleration of vesting following a change in control only when the recipient is terminated without “cause” or is subject to a “constructive termination” during the 24 months following a change in control.

Generally speaking, and as qualified by the terms of the relevant agreements, plans, and award notices, a "change in control" occurs if: (i) someone acquires 50% or more of the combined voting power of our stock, unless after the transaction more than 75% of the acquiring company is owned by all or substantially all of those persons who were beneficial owners of our stock prior to such acquisition; (ii) a majority of our directors is replaced, other than by new directors approved by existing directors; (iii) we consummate a reorganization, merger, or consolidation where, following such transaction, all or substantially all of those persons who were beneficial owners of our stock immediately prior to the transaction do not own, immediately after the transaction, more than 75% of the outstanding securities of the resulting corporation; (iv) we consummate a transaction subject to Rule 13e-3 of the Exchange Act in which David or Jacqueline Parker or their siblings, children, or grandchildren or a trust, corporation, partnership, limited partnership, limited liability company, or other entity controlled by the foregoing, are the beneficial owners of more than 50% of the outstanding securities of the resulting corporation ordinarily having the right to vote in the election of directors, or (v) we sell or liquidate all or substantially all of our assets.

The estimated value of restricted stock and options that would have vested for our continuing Named Executive Officers as of December 31, 2021 under the acceleration scenarios described above is set forth in the table below.  The value for the accelerated restricted stock was calculated by multiplying the closing market price of our stock on December 31, 2021 ($26.43) by the number of shares of accelerated restricted stock. The value for the accelerated options was calculated by subtracting the exercise price of the accelerated options from the closing market price of our stock on December 31, 2021 ($26.43) and multiplying that amount by the number of accelerated options. For additional information on the number of currently unvested restricted stock and stock options that may immediately vest in the event of a change in control, please refer to the Outstanding Equity Awards at Year-End Table.

The following table describes each component of the "All Other Compensation" column in the Summary Compensation Table.

See Executive Compensation – Compensation Discussion and Analysis for a complete description of our compensation plans pursuant to which the amounts listed under the Summary Compensation Table were paid or awarded and the criteria for such award or payment.

The following table sets forth information concerning each grant of an award made to our Named Executive Officers during 2021.

See Executive Compensation – Compensation Discussion and Analysis for a complete description of the performance targets for payment of incentive awards.

The following table sets forth certain information concerning the values realized upon vesting of restricted stock during 2021.

The following table sets forth information concerning all stock option grants and stock awards held by our Named Executive Officers as of December 31, 2021.  All outstanding equity awards are in shares of our Class A common stock. All options and restricted shares that have not vested are subject to certain continued employment, acceleration, and forfeiture provisions.