SEC Info  
    Home      Search      My Interests      Help      Sign In      Please Sign In

Trump Entertainment Resorts, Inc. – ‘424B1’ on 4/12/96

As of:  Friday, 4/12/96   ·   Accession #:  950130-96-1226   ·   File #:  333-00639

Find Words in Filings emoji
 
  in    Show  and   Hints

  As Of                Filer                Filing    For·On·As Docs:Size              Issuer               Agent

 4/12/96  Trump Entertainment Resorts, Inc. 424B1                  1:784K                                   Donnelley R R & S… 02/FA

Prospectus   —   Rule 424(b)(1)
Filing Table of Contents

Document/Exhibit                   Description                      Pages   Size 

 1: 424B1       Final Prospectus Dated April 11, 1996                203   1.17M 


Document Table of Contents

Page (sequential) | (alphabetic) Top
 
11st Page   -   Filing Submission
"Common Stock
3Prospectus Summary
"The Company
"Management believes the Company will benefit from the following factors:
5Atlantic City Properties
"Trump Plaza
"Trump Plaza Expansion
"Trump
6The Taj Mahal
7The Indiana Riverboat
"The Stock Offering
8The Mortgage Note Offering
"Risk Factors
9Use of Proceeds
17The Merger Transaction
22High Leverage and Fixed Charges
"Holding Company Structure; No Anticipation of Dividends
23Risk in Refinancing and Repayment of Indebtedness; Need for Additional Financing
24Restrictions on Certain Activities
"Historical Results; Past Net Losses
25Taj Mahal
"Conflicts of Interest
"Control and Involvement of Trump
27Change of Control
"Atlantic City Properties Expansion
28Trump Plaza East
"Trump World's Fair
30Competition
33Strict Regulation by Gaming Authorities
35Considerations with Respect to the Acquisition or Development of Additional Gaming Ventures
"Limitations on License of the Trump Name
37Shares Eligible for Future Sale
40Price Range of Common Stock
"Dividend Policy
41Capitalization
42Selected Historical Consolidated Financial Information
44Taj Associates
45Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
"Plaza Associates
50Liquidity and Capital Resources
53Trump Indiana
54Trump AC
56Unaudited Pro Forma Financial Information
62Business
66Atlantic City Marketing Strategy
"Business Strategy
67Facilities and Amenities
69Atlantic City Market
71Indiana Riverboat
75Properties
"Plaza Casino Parcel
79Taj Entertainment Complex
"Steel Pier
81Trademark/Licensing
"Restructurings
"The 1992 Plaza Restructuring
82The 1991 Taj Restructuring
83Certain Indebtedness
"Senior Notes
84Taj Bonds
85NatWest Loan
86First Fidelity Loan/Specified Parcels
"TTMI Note
87Working Capital Facility
88Legal Proceedings
95Regulatory Matters
"New Jersey Gaming Regulations
"Casino Licensee
98Interim Casino Authorization
99Approved Hotel Facilities
100Investment Alternative Tax Obligations
101Conservatorship
"Qualification of Employees
102Indiana Gaming Regulations
"Indiana Gaming Commission
"Certificate of Suitability
103Interim Compliance Requirements
104Excursions
106Other Laws and Regulations
108Management
113Executive Compensation
116Employment Agreements
118Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
119Certain Related Party Transactions of Trump -- Plaza Associates
122Certain Related Party Transactions of Trump -- Taj Associates and Affiliates
123Other Relationships
125Certain Transactions
127Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management
128Description of Capital Stock
"Common Stock and Class B Common Stock
129Preferred Stock
132Description of the THCR Holdings Partnership Agreement
133Exchange and Registration Rights
135Contribution Agreement
136Other
138Special Tax Considerations for Foreign Shareholders
140Underwriting
142Legal Matters
"Experts
"Available Information
143Index to Financial Statements
158Services Agreement
"Executive Agreement
195Table of Contents
424B11st Page of 203TOCTopPreviousNextBottomJust 1st
 

Rule No. 424(b)(1) Registration No. 333-639 PROSPECTUS APRIL 11, 1996 TRUMP HOTELS & CASINO RESORTS 12,500,000 SHARES TRUMP HOTELS & CASINO RESORTS, INC. COMMON STOCK All of the shares of Common Stock ("Common Stock") offered hereby (the "Stock Offering") are being sold by Trump Hotels & Casino Resorts, Inc. (the "Company"). The Stock Offering is part of a comprehensive plan (the "Merger Transaction") relating to the acquisition (the "Merger") of Trump Taj Mahal Associates ("Taj Associates"), the owner and operator of the Trump Taj Mahal Casino Resort (the "Taj Mahal"), by Trump Hotels & Casino Resorts Holdings, L.P., a subsidiary of the Company ("THCR Holdings"), and the refinancing of the debt obligations of Taj Associates and Trump Plaza Associates ("Plaza Associates"), the owner and operator of the Trump Plaza Hotel and Casino ("Trump Plaza"). Upon consummation of the Merger Transaction, Trump Atlantic City Associates ("Trump AC"), a wholly owned subsidiary of THCR Holdings, will wholly own Plaza Associates and Taj Associates. In addition to the shares of Common Stock to be issued in the Stock Offering, the Company may issue shares of Common Stock pursuant to the Merger. As part of the Merger Transaction and concurrently with the Stock Offering, Trump AC and Trump Atlantic City Funding, Inc. ("Trump AC Funding"), a wholly owned finance subsidiary of Trump AC, are offering $1.2 billion aggregate principal amount of first mortgage notes (the "Mortgage Notes") (the "Mortgage Note Offering"). Consummation of the Stock Offering is conditioned upon the consummation of the other transactions contemplated by the Merger Transaction (including the Mortgage Note Offering). The Common Stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange ("NYSE") under the symbol "DJT." On April 11, 1996, the closing price of the Common Stock on the NYSE was $31 1/4 per share. See "Price Range of Common Stock." INVESTMENT IN THE SECURITIES OFFERED HEREBY INVOLVES A HIGH DEGREE OF RISK. SEE "RISK FACTORS" BEGINNING ON PAGE 22 FOR A DISCUSSION OF CERTAIN FACTORS THAT SHOULD BE CONSIDERED IN CONNECTION WITH AN INVESTMENT IN THE COMMON STOCK OFFERED HEREBY. THESE SECURITIES HAVE NOT BEEN APPROVED OR DISAPPROVED BY THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ANY STATE SECURITIES COMMISSION NOR HAS THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ANY STATE SECURITIES COMMISSION PASSED UPON THE ACCURACY OR ADEQUACY OF THIS PROSPECTUS. ANY REPRESENTATION TO THE CONTRARY IS A CRIMINAL OFFENSE. NEITHER THE NEW JERSEY CASINO CONTROL COMMISSION, THE INDIANA GAMING COMMISSION NOR ANY OTHER REGULATORY AUTHORITY HAS PASSED UPON THE ACCURACY OR ADEQUACY OF THIS PROSPECTUS. ANY REPRESENTATION TO THE CONTRARY IS UNLAWFUL. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- [Download Table] PRICE UNDERWRITING PROCEEDS TO THE DISCOUNTS AND TO THE PUBLIC COMMISSIONS(1) COMPANY(2) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Per Share.............................. $31.25 $1.70 $29.55 Total(3)............................... $390,625,000 $21,250,000 $369,375,000 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (1) The Company and its subsidiaries have agreed to indemnify the Underwriters against certain liabilities, including liabilities under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. See "Underwriting." (2) Before deducting expenses estimated at $3.0 million, payable by Trump Hotels & Casino Resorts Holdings, L.P. (3) The Company has granted to the Underwriters a 30-day option to purchase up to 1,875,000 additional shares of Common Stock, on the same terms and conditions as set forth above, solely to cover over-allotments, if any. If such option is exercised in full, the total Price to the Public, Underwriting Discounts and Commissions, and Proceeds to the Company will be $449,218,750, $24,437,500 and $424,781,250, respectively. See "Underwriting." The shares of Common Stock offered by this Prospectus are offered by the several Underwriters when, as and if delivered to and accepted by the Underwriters and subject to various prior conditions, including their right to reject orders in whole or in part. It is expected that delivery of the shares of Common Stock will be made in New York, New York on or about April 17, 1996. DONALDSON, LUFKIN & JENRETTE SECURITIES CORPORATION SALOMON BROTHERS INC BT SECURITIES CORPORATION SANDS BROTHERS & CO., LTD.
424B12nd Page of 203TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 2nd
[Two photos of the Trump Taj Mahal Casino Resort--Atlantic City's "Must See" Attraction] [Photo of Trump Plaza Hotel and Casino & Trump World's Fair--Atlantic City's Centerpiece] THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK HAS NOT PASSED UPON THE ACCURACY OR ADEQUACY OF THIS PROSPECTUS. ANY REPRESENTATION TO THE CONTRARY IS UNLAWFUL. IN CONNECTION WITH THIS STOCK OFFERING, THE UNDERWRITERS MAY OVER-ALLOT OR EFFECT TRANSACTIONS WHICH STABILIZE OR MAINTAIN THE MARKET PRICE OF THE COMMON STOCK OFFERED HEREBY AT A LEVEL ABOVE THAT WHICH MIGHT OTHERWISE PREVAIL IN THE OPEN MARKET. SUCH TRANSACTIONS MAY BE EFFECTED ON THE NEW YORK STOCK EXCHANGE, IN THE OVER-THE-COUNTER MARKET OR OTHERWISE. SUCH STABILIZING, IF COMMENCED, MAY BE DISCONTINUED AT ANY TIME. 2
424B13rd Page of 203TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 3rd
PROSPECTUS SUMMARY The following is a summary of certain information contained elsewhere in this Prospectus and is qualified in its entirety by the more detailed information and financial statements, and notes thereto, contained elsewhere in this Prospectus. Unless otherwise indicated, (i) the term "Company" as used in this Prospectus includes the Company and its subsidiaries and gives effect to the Merger Transaction and (ii) the information in this Prospectus assumes no exercise of the Underwriters' over-allotment option. Prospective investors are urged to read this Prospectus carefully in its entirety. This Prospectus contains forward-looking information that involves risks and uncertainties and such information is subject to the assumptions set forth in connection therewith and the information contained herein. THE COMPANY Trump Hotels & Casino Resorts, Inc. (the "Company") will acquire all of the outstanding equity interests of Trump Taj Mahal Associates ("Taj Associates"), which owns and operates the Trump Taj Mahal Casino Resort (the "Taj Mahal"), in connection with the Merger Transaction. The Merger Transaction will create one of the largest casino entertainment companies in the United States by combining two "Four Star" Atlantic City casino hotels, a riverboat gaming project approximately 25 miles from downtown Chicago (the "Indiana Riverboat") and the rights to any future Donald J. Trump ("Trump") gaming venture. Upon consummation of the Merger Transaction, the Company will own and operate the Taj Mahal, currently Atlantic City's largest casino, and Trump Plaza Hotel and Casino ("Trump Plaza" and, together with the Taj Mahal, the "Atlantic City Properties"), which will have the largest casino in Atlantic City upon completion of its ongoing expansion program (the "Trump Plaza Expansion"). Following the consummation of the Merger Transaction, the Company also plans to undertake an expansion program at the Taj Mahal designed to increase its hotel room inventory and casino floor space and expand its entertainment and parking facilities (the "Taj Mahal Expansion"). In addition, the Company expects to commence operations in the second quarter of 1996 of the Indiana Riverboat casino at Buffington Harbor on Lake Michigan, which will establish the Company's position in the greater Chicago metropolitan area market, one of the most successful new gaming markets in the United States. The Company is and will continue to be the exclusive vehicle through which Trump will engage in new gaming activities in both emerging and established gaming jurisdictions. Management believes that the acquisition of the Taj Mahal will strengthen the Company's position as a leader in the casino entertainment industry through its ownership of two successful land-based casino hotels. Furthermore, the Merger Transaction will enhance the Company's presence in the growing Atlantic City market, which, in terms of gaming revenues, has demonstrated a ten-year compound annual growth rate of approximately 5.8% and a growth rate of approximately 9.5% for calendar year 1995 versus calendar year 1994. After giving effect to the Merger Transaction and the Trump Plaza Expansion, the Company will have approximately one-quarter of Atlantic City's casino square footage, slot machines, table games and hotel room inventory. In addition, the combination of the Taj Mahal with Trump Plaza's existing and planned operations will provide opportunities for operational efficiencies, economies of scale and benefits from the expertise and experience of management at the operating entities. Management further believes that the Company's size following the Merger Transaction along with its industry experience and reputation for quality will allow the Company to compete effectively for gaming licenses in other jurisdictions. Management believes the Company will benefit from the following factors: . LEADING ATLANTIC CITY FACILITIES. Upon consummation of the Trump Plaza Expansion, the Company will own and operate the two largest casino hotel properties in Atlantic City, both of which are strategically located on The Boardwalk. The Company believes that the Atlantic City Properties' prime locations, reputations for high quality amenities and first-class customer service and targeted marketing strategies are ideally suited to capitalize on the expected continued growth in the Atlantic City gaming market. The Company believes that its leading size and market share in Atlantic City following the 3
424B14th Page of 203TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 4th
consummation of the Merger Transaction, will provide it with a competitive advantage in marketing the Atlantic City Properties, particularly to large convention groups and multi-day stay destination resort visitors. . ATLANTIC CITY PROPERTIES EXPANSION. The Company has nearly completed the Trump Plaza Expansion and is developing the plans for the Taj Mahal Expansion, which projects will increase the Atlantic City Properties' gaming space and hotel room capacity allowing the Company to meet both existing demand and the anticipated demand from the increased number of available rooms and infrastructure improvements that are currently under development to enhance further the "vacation destination appeal" of Atlantic City. The following table profiles the Company's casino and hotel capacity following the planned expansions at the Atlantic City Properties: [Enlarge/Download Table] TRUMP TAJ INDIANA TRUMP PLAZA TAJ MAHAL PLAZA(a) MAHAL RIVERBOAT(b) EXPANSION(c) EXPANSION(d) TOTAL -------- ------- ------------ ------------ ------------ ------- Casino square footage... 75,395 120,000(e) 37,000 64,158 60,000 356,553 Slot machines........... 2,368 3,550 1,500 1,898 2,500 11,816 Table games............. 97 169 73 44 -- 383 Hotel rooms............. 555 1,250 -- 849 800 3,454 -------- (a) Includes the 2,000 square foot area connecting the existing facility with Trump Plaza East (as defined) and the 75 slot machines included in this area. (b) Scheduled to open in the second quarter of 1996. (c) Includes the 15,000 square foot casino with 400 slot machines and 13 table games and 326 hotel rooms which have already opened at Trump Plaza East. The remaining 14 hotel rooms and suites at Trump Plaza East are scheduled to be opened by the end of April 1996. Also reflects nine super suites scheduled to open early in 1997 and not otherwise included in the "Trump Plaza Expansion." The remaining portion of the Trump Plaza Expansion, Trump World's Fair (as defined), is scheduled to open in the second quarter of 1996. (d) Plans for the Taj Mahal Expansion, scheduled to be completed in phases from the first quarter of 1997 through early 1998, are subject to modification. (e) Excludes a 12,000 square foot poker, keno and race simulcasting room which contains 64 poker tables. . OPERATING SYNERGIES. The Company intends to capitalize on the opportunities for efficiencies which can be generated by integrating certain operations of the Atlantic City Properties, which previously have been operated separately. Management has identified cost savings which management estimates, by the end of the second year following the Merger Transaction, to be approximately $18-20 million on an annual basis, although no assurance may be made as to the amount which will be realized. Management believes that it will be able to consolidate certain departments at the Atlantic City Properties, reduce general and administrative expenses through possible personnel reductions and the consolidation of certain marketing efforts and reduce operating costs through efficiencies that are expected to result from the combined purchasing power of the Atlantic City Properties. . INDIANA RIVERBOAT. Trump Indiana, Inc. ("Trump Indiana"), the Company's subsidiary that owns and will operate the Indiana Riverboat, has received site approval and a certificate of suitability to develop a gaming project at Buffington Harbor on Lake Michigan, approximately 25 miles southeast of downtown Chicago. The Indiana Riverboat is one of 11 riverboat gaming projects permitted under current Indiana law and one of only five to be located in northern Indiana. The Indiana Riverboat is currently scheduled to open for business in the second quarter of 1996. The Indiana Riverboat is planned to have approximately 37,000 square feet of gaming space that will feature 1,500 slot machines and 73 table games and will be one of the largest riverboat casinos in the United States. The Indiana Riverboat's principal market will be the approximately 6.8 million people residing within 50 miles of Buffington Harbor in the greater Chicago metropolitan area. Approximately 11.2 million and 24.2 million people live within a 100- and 200-mile radius of Buffington Harbor, respectively. 4
424B15th Page of 203TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 5th
. THE "TRUMP" NAME. The Company capitalizes on the widespread recognition of the "Trump" name and its association with high quality amenities and first class service. To this end, the Company provides a broadly diversified gaming and entertainment experience consistent with the "Trump" name and reputation for quality, tailored to the gaming patron in each market. The Company also benefits from the "Trump" name in connection with its efforts to expand and to procure new gaming opportunities in the United States and abroad, as well as to explore opportunities to establish additional gaming operations, particularly in jurisdictions where the legalization of casino gaming is relatively new or anticipated. ATLANTIC CITY PROPERTIES TRUMP PLAZA Management believes that Trump Plaza's "Four Star" Mobil Travel Guide rating and "Four Diamond" American Automobile Association rating reflect the high quality amenities and services that Trump Plaza provides to its casino patrons and hotel guests. These amenities and services include a broad selection of dining choices, headline entertainment, deluxe accommodations, tennis courts and swimming and health spa facilities. Trump Plaza Expansion. The Company is seeking to enhance further Trump Plaza's position as an industry leader through the Trump Plaza Expansion, scheduled to be completed in the second quarter of 1996, which involves expanding and renovating Trump Plaza's gaming space, increasing its hotel capacity and constructing retail operations and entertainment venues. As part of the Trump Plaza Expansion, the Company has renovated and integrated into Trump Plaza a hotel located adjacent to Trump Plaza's main tower ("Trump Plaza East"), the grand opening for which was held on February 16, 1996, and is in the process of renovating and integrating the former Trump Regency Hotel ("Trump World's Fair"), located on The Boardwalk adjacent to the existing Atlantic City Convention Center, which is next to Trump Plaza. In February 1996, Trump Plaza East opened the 15,000 square foot Ocean View Casino and Bar, and has to date opened 326 of its 349 hotel rooms. The Ocean View Casino and Bar is the first gaming room in Atlantic City to combine a casino, bar and entertainment area and features a 70-foot long bar with 27 bar- top slot machines, live entertainment and a 58 square foot video wall. With its high ceilings and windows overlooking the Atlantic Ocean and The Boardwalk, Trump Plaza is creating a new and exciting entertainment environment for its casino patrons. Upon completion of the Trump Plaza Expansion, Trump Plaza's casino floor space will be the largest in Atlantic City, increasing from approximately 75,000 square feet to an aggregate of approximately 140,000 square feet, housing a total of approximately 4,270 slot machines and 140 table games. Trump Plaza's hotel capacity will increase to a total of 1,404 guest rooms, making Trump Plaza's guest room inventory one of the largest in Atlantic City. Management believes the increased hotel capacity as a result of the Trump Plaza Expansion will better enable Trump Plaza to meet demand and accommodate its casino guests, as well as to host additional and larger conventions and corporate meetings. The following table details plans for the Trump Plaza Expansion: [Download Table] TRUMP TRUMP PLAZA TRUMP WORLD'S FACILITY(a) PLAZA EAST(b) FAIR(c) TOTAL ----------- ------------- ------- ------- Casino square footage................. 75,395 14,886 49,272 139,553 Slot machines......................... 2,368 405 1,493 4,266 Table games........................... 97 12 32 141 Hotel rooms........................... 555 349 500 1,404 -------------------- (a) Includes the 2,000 square foot area connecting the existing facility with Trump Plaza East (as defined) and the 75 slot machines included in this area. (b) The casino and 326 hotel rooms have already opened. The remaining 14 hotel rooms and suites are scheduled to be open by the end of April 1996. Also reflects nine super suites scheduled to open early in 1997 and not otherwise included in the "Trump Plaza Expansion." (c) Scheduled to open in the second quarter of 1996. 5
424B16th Page of 203TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 6th
The Trump Plaza Expansion will increase Trump Plaza's prime central frontage on The Boardwalk to nearly a quarter of a mile. Furthermore, Trump World's Fair will add approximately 50,000 square feet of casino floor space, approximately 16,000 of which will be directly accessible from The Boardwalk, and Trump Plaza has been reconfigured to provide a new entranceway to Trump Plaza directly off the Atlantic City Expressway. Management believes that the construction of a new convention center and "tourist corridor" linking the new convention center with The Boardwalk will enhance the desirability of Atlantic City generally and, as a result of Trump Plaza's central location, will benefit Trump Plaza in particular. Trump Plaza's location on The Boardwalk at the end of the main highway into Atlantic City makes it highly accessible for both "drive-in" and "walk-in" patrons. THE TAJ MAHAL The Taj Mahal currently has the largest casino in Atlantic City and has ranked first among all Atlantic City casinos in terms of total gaming revenues, table revenues and slot revenues since it commenced operations in 1990. The Taj Mahal capitalizes on the widespread recognition and marquee status of the "Trump" name and its association with high quality amenities and first-class service as evidenced by its "Four Star" Mobil Travel Guide rating. Management believes that the breadth and diversity of the Taj Mahal's casino, entertainment and convention facilities and its status as a "must-see" attraction will enable the Taj Mahal to benefit from the expected continued growth of the Atlantic City market. In order to enhance its status as a "must- see" attraction, the Taj Mahal has recently signed agreements for the development of the Hard Rock Cafe(R), Rainforest Cafe(R) and All Star Cafe(R) themed restaurants on the property. In addition, in order to continue to attract high end players, the Taj Mahal has recently opened the Dragon Room, a new Asian themed table game area, and plans to open the "Sultan's Palace," a new high-end "slots only" lounge and private club in the second quarter of 1996. The Taj Mahal Expansion. The Taj Mahal Expansion is scheduled to be completed in phases from the first quarter of 1997 through early 1998. The Taj Mahal Expansion, the plans for which are subject to modification, involves the construction of an approximately 2,000 space expansion of the Taj Mahal's existing self-parking facilities and a new 10,000 seat arena adjacent to the Taj Mahal, each scheduled to be completed in the first quarter of 1997; the conversion of the current site of the Mark Etess Arena into a new 60,000 square-foot circus-themed casino with 2,500 slot machines, scheduled to be completed in mid-1997; and the construction of an approximately 800 room hotel tower adjacent to the Taj Mahal's existing hotel tower, which is scheduled to be completed early in 1998. THE ATLANTIC CITY MARKET The Atlantic City gaming market has demonstrated continued growth despite the recent proliferation of new gaming venues across the country. The 12 casino hotels in Atlantic City generated approximately $3.75 billion in gaming revenues in 1995, an approximately 9.5% increase over 1994 gaming revenues of approximately $3.42 billion. During 1995, all 12 casinos experienced increased gaming revenues compared to 1994. The approximately $3.75 billion of gaming revenues produced by the 12 Atlantic City casino hotels in 1995 exceeded the approximately $3.12 billion of gaming revenues produced by the 18 largest (based on net revenues) casino hotels on the Las Vegas Strip for the same period, even though the 12 Atlantic City casino hotels have less than one-quarter the number of hotel rooms of such Las Vegas Strip casino hotels. Management believes, however, that given current high occupancy levels, future casino revenue growth in the Atlantic City market will be dependent in part upon expansion in hotel capacity. Due principally to an improved regulatory environment, the general improvement of economic conditions in 1993, 1994 and 1995 and existing high occupancy rates, significant investment in the Atlantic City market has been initiated and/or announced. For example, Trump Plaza will be located at the end of the planned "tourist corridor" featuring an entertainment and retail complex that will link The Boardwalk with downtown Atlantic 6
424B17th Page of 203TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 7th
City. In addition, the New Jersey Casino Redevelopment Authority ("CRDA") is currently overseeing the development of a new convention center. When completed, the approximately $250 million convention center will be the largest exhibition space between New York City and Washington, D.C. The new convention center, currently scheduled to open in January 1997, will be located at the base of the Atlantic City Expressway. Trump Plaza is adjacent to the existing Atlantic City Convention Center and will also be one of the closest casino hotels to the new convention center, which as currently planned would hold approximately 500,000 square feet of exhibit and pre-function space, 45 meeting rooms, food-service facilities and a 1,600-car underground parking garage. An additional planned infrastructure improvement is the State of New Jersey's approximately $125 million capital plan to upgrade and expand the Atlantic City International Airport. The Company believes that, as leading Atlantic City attractions, the Atlantic City Properties will attract a large portion of any increase in the number of potential casino hotel patrons. THE INDIANA RIVERBOAT The Indiana Riverboat, currently scheduled to open for business in the second quarter of 1996, will feature an approximately 288-foot luxury yacht with approximately 37,000 square feet of gaming space with 1,500 slot machines, 73 table games and capacity for approximately 2,450 passengers and 300 employees and will be one of the largest riverboat casinos in the United States. Trump Indiana is one of 11 riverboat gaming projects permitted under current Indiana law and one of only five to be located in northern Indiana. The Indiana Riverboat's principal market will be the approximately 6.8 million people residing within 50 miles of Buffington Harbor in the greater Chicago metropolitan area. Approximately 11.2 million and 24.2 million people live within a 100- and 200-mile radius of Buffington Harbor, respectively, encompassing portions of the states of Indiana, Illinois, Michigan, Ohio and Wisconsin (the "Great Lakes Market"). Through the use of the "Trump" name and systematic marketing programs, the Company will seek to attract drive-in customers to the Indiana Riverboat. Casinos currently operating in the Great Lakes Market have generally been very successful, achieving operating results exceeding those of most new jurisdictional markets. The Company believes that these operating results indicate that the Great Lakes Market should be capable of absorbing significant capacity expansion in the future. Under current regulations in Indiana, most games typically available in Atlantic City casinos will be permitted on the Indiana Riverboat. Riverboat casinos in Indiana will be permitted to stay open 24 hours per day, 365 days per year and to extend credit and accept credit charge cards, with no loss or wagering limits. THE STOCK OFFERING [Download Table] Common Stock Offered.................. 12,500,000 shares Common Stock to be outstanding after the Merger Transaction............... 23,377,718 shares(/1/) New York Stock Exchange Symbol........ DJT -------------------- (1) Does not include (i) 6,680,723 shares of Common Stock (subject to certain adjustments) issuable to Trump upon conversion of his limited partnership interest in THCR Holdings; (ii) 1,391,584 shares of Common Stock (subject to certain adjustments) issuable to Trump Taj Mahal, Inc. ("TTMI"), a corporation wholly owned by Trump, upon conversion of its limited partnership interests in THCR Holdings; (iii) 133,333 shares of Common Stock issuable upon exercise of options granted to the Chief Executive Officer of the Company pursuant to the 1995 Stock Plan; (iv) a phantom stock unit award (representing the right to receive 66,666 shares of Common Stock on June 12, 1997) granted to the Chief Executive Officer of the Company pursuant to the 1995 Stock Plan; (v) 733,334 additional shares reserved for issuance pursuant to the 1995 Stock Incentive Plan; (vi) 1,800,000 shares of Common Stock underlying the warrant to be issued to Trump in connection with the Merger Transaction (a) 600,000 shares of which may be purchased on or before the third anniversary of the issuance of the warrant at $30.00 per share, (b) 600,000 shares of which may be purchased on or before the fourth anniversary of the issuance of the warrant at $35.00 per share, and (c) 600,000 shares of which may be purchased on or before the fifth anniversary of the issuance of the warrant at $40.00 per share; or (vii) any shares of Common Stock which may be issued in the Merger. Also excludes shares of Class B Stock of the Company held and to be held by Trump and TTMI which represent non-economic voting interest in the Company. Includes an estimation of the number of fractional shares of Common Stock to be issued in the Merger. 7
424B18th Page of 203TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 8th
THE MORTGAGE NOTE OFFERING (Offered by Trump AC and Trump AC Funding exclusively pursuant to a separate prospectus.) Concurrently with and as a condition to consummation of the Stock Offering, Trump AC and Trump AC Funding will issue $1.2 billion of Mortgage Notes pursuant to the Mortgage Note Offering. Trump AC Funding, a Delaware corporation, was recently formed for the sole purpose of, and will engage in no activities or business other than in connection with, the issuance of the Mortgage Notes. Certain terms of the Mortgage Notes are described under "Business--Certain Indebtedness." The Mortgage Note Offering and the Stock Offering (collectively, the "Offerings") are part of the comprehensive plan relating to the Merger of a subsidiary of the company with and into Taj Mahal Holding Corp. ("Taj Holding"), which currently beneficially owns a 50% equity interest in Taj Associates; the contribution by the Company to Trump AC (on behalf, and at the direction, of THCR Holdings) of all of its direct and indirect ownership interests in Taj Associates acquired in the Merger; the contribution by Trump of the remaining 50% equity interest in Taj Associates to Trump AC (on behalf, and at the direction, of THCR Holdings); and the refinancing of substantially all of the outstanding indebtedness of Taj Associates and Plaza Associates. The consummation of the Stock Offering is conditioned upon the consummation of each transaction contemplated by the Merger Transaction, including the Senior Note Consent Solicitation (as defined), the Plaza Note Consent Solicitation (as defined), the Plaza Note Purchase (as defined) and the Mortgage Note Offering. RISK FACTORS Prospective investors should carefully evaluate the matters set forth herein, including those under the heading "Risk Factors." Factors to be considered include: . the high leverage and fixed charges of the Company . the Company's holding company structure and the likelihood that dividends will not be paid for the foreseeable future . the risk in refinancing and repayment of indebtedness, and the need for additional financing . the restrictions on certain activities imposed by certain debt instruments . the historical results of Trump Plaza and the Taj Mahal, including past net losses . conflicts of interest . control by and the involvement of Trump . risks associated with the Trump Plaza Expansion and the Taj Mahal Expansion . risks relating to the Indiana Riverboat . competition in the gaming industry . reliance on certain key personnel . the strict regulation by gaming authorities, including the potential disqualification of holders of Common Stock . considerations with respect to the acquisition and development of additional gaming ventures . limitations on the Company's license of the "Trump" name . fraudulent transfer considerations . the shares of Common Stock eligible for future sale . the trading markets and potential volatility of the market price of the shares of Common Stock. 8
424B19th Page of 203TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 9th
USE OF PROCEEDS The net proceeds to the Company from the Stock Offering, after payment of underwriting discounts of the Stock Offering, are estimated to be $369.4 million ($424.8 million if the Underwriters' over-allotment option is exercised in full). The proceeds from the Stock Offering, together with the proceeds from the Mortgage Note Offering, will be used as set forth below to: (i) pay cash to those holders of Class A Common Stock, par value $.01 per share, of Taj Holding (the "Taj Holding Class A Common Stock") electing to receive cash in the Merger; (ii) redeem the outstanding 11.35% Mortgage Bonds, Series A, due 1999 (the "Taj Bonds") of Trump Taj Mahal Funding, Inc.'s ("Taj Funding") (the "Taj Bond Redemption"), at a redemption price equal to 100% of the principal amount thereof, plus accrued interest to the date of redemption; (iii) redeem the outstanding shares of the Class B Common Stock, par value $.01 per share, of Taj Holding (the "Taj Holding Class B Common Stock"), as required in connection with the Taj Bond Redemption at the redemption price of $.50 per share; (iv) retire the outstanding 10 7/8% Mortgage Notes due 2001 (the "Plaza Notes") of Trump Plaza Funding, Inc. ("Plaza Funding"), (the "Plaza Note Purchase"); (v) satisfy the indebtedness of Taj Associates under a loan agreement with National Westminster Bank USA ("NatWest") (the "NatWest Loan"); (vi) purchase certain real property used in the operation of the Taj Mahal that is currently leased from a corporation wholly owned by Trump and satisfy certain related indebtedness owed to First Fidelity Bank, National Association (now known as First Union National Bank) ("First Fidelity") (the "First Fidelity Loan"); (vii) purchase Trump Plaza East pursuant to the purchase option (the "Trump Plaza East Purchase Option") held by Trump Plaza Associates ("Plaza Associates"), the owner and operator of Trump Plaza; (viii) pay Bankers Trust Company ("Bankers Trust") $10 million to obtain releases of liens and guarantees that Bankers Trust has in connection with certain outstanding indebtedness owed by Trump to Bankers Trust (the "Trump Indebtedness"); and (ix) pay related fees and expenses and provide for working capital and other general corporate purposes. 9
424B110th Page of 203TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 10th
The following table sets forth the anticipated sources and uses of funds for the Merger Transaction (assuming an April 15, 1996 consummation): (DOLLARS IN MILLIONS) ANTICIPATED SOURCES OF FUNDS [Download Table] CASH SOURCES Stock Offering.................... $ 390.6 Mortgage Note Offering............ 1,200.0 -------- Total Cash Sources............... 1,590.6 -------- NON-CASH SOURCES Common Stock Equivalents to be issued to Trump(b).. 40.5 Common Stock to be issued to Holders of Taj Holding Class A Common Stock..................... 9.0 Common Stock to be issued to First Fidelity......................... 15.6 -------- Total Non-Cash Sources........... 65.1 -------- TOTAL SOURCES..................... $1,655.7 ======== ANTICIPATED USES OF FUNDS [Download Table] CASH USES Redeem Taj Bonds(a).............. $ 794.4 Retire Plaza Notes............... 370.0 Satisfy NatWest Loan............. 36.5 Exercise Trump Plaza East Purchase Option................. 28.0 Financing Fees and Expenses...... 57.3 Payment to First Fidelity........ 50.0 Payment to Bankers Trust......... 10.0 Acquisition of Taj Holding Class A Common Stock.................. 31.5 Redeem Taj Holding Class B Common Stock........................... 0.4 Transaction Fees and Expenses.... 30.0 Working Capital/General Corporate Purposes........................ 182.5 -------- Total Cash Uses................. 1,590.6 -------- NON-CASH USES Acquisition of Trump's direct and indirect equity interests in Taj Associates...................... 40.5 Common Stock issued to Holders of Taj Holding Class A Common Stock........................... 9.0 Common Stock issued to First Fidelity........................ 15.6 -------- Total Non-Cash Uses............. 65.1 -------- TOTAL USES....................... $1,655.7 ======== ------------------- (a) Includes the Additional Amount (as defined) through April 15, 1996. See "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations." (b) Represents the value of the shares of Common Stock into which the limited partnership interests in THCR Holdings to be issued to Trump and TTMI, a corporation wholly owned by Trump, in connection with the Merger Transaction will be convertible. 10
424B111th Page of 203TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 11th
SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION OF THE COMPANY The following tables set forth (a) certain historical consolidated financial information of Trump AC (formerly Trump Plaza Holding Associates) and Plaza Associates (predecessors of the Company) for each of the years ended December 31, 1991 through 1994 and for the period January 1, 1995 through June 12, 1995 and certain historical consolidated financial information of the Company for the period from inception (June 12, 1995) to December 31, 1995 (see Note 1 below) and (b) unaudited pro forma financial information of the Company. The unaudited pro forma information gives effect to the Merger Transaction. The historical financial information of Trump AC and Plaza Associates as of December 31, 1994 and June 12, 1995 and for the years ended December 31, 1993, 1994 and for the period January 1, 1995 through June 12, 1995 as set forth below has been derived from the audited consolidated financial statements of Trump AC and Plaza Associates included elsewhere in this Prospectus. The historical financial information of Trump AC and Plaza Associates as of December 31, 1991, 1992 and 1993 and for the years ended December 31, 1991 and 1992 as set forth below was derived from the audited consolidated financial statements of Trump AC and Plaza Associates not included in this Prospectus. The historical financial information of the Company as of December 31, 1995 and for the period from inception (June 12, 1995) through December 31, 1995 as set forth below has been derived from the audited consolidated financial statements of the Company included elsewhere in this Prospectus. The pro forma Statement of Operations Data and Other Data give effect to the Merger Transaction as if it had occurred on January 1, 1995 and the pro forma Balance Sheet Data gives effect to the same as if it had occurred on December 31, 1995. The pro forma financial information should not be considered indicative of actual results that would have been achieved had the transactions occurred on the date or for the period indicated and does not purport to indicate results of operations as of any future date or for any future period. All financial information should be read in conjunction with "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations," "Unaudited Pro Forma Financial Information" and the consolidated and condensed financial statements and the related notes thereto included elsewhere in this Prospectus. 11
424B112th Page of 203TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 12th
[Enlarge/Download Table] TRUMP AC AND PLAZA ASSOCIATES THE COMPANY ------------------------------------------------------ --------------- FROM FROM INCEPTION YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, JANUARY 1 1995 (JUNE 12, 1995) -------------------------------------- THROUGH TO DECEMBER 31, 1991 1992 1993 1994 JUNE 12, 1995 1995 (NOTE 1) -------- -------- -------- -------- -------------- --------------- (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS DATA: Net revenues........... $279,684 $313,318 $300,491 $295,063 $137,848 $195,473 Depreciation and amor- tization.............. 16,193 15,842 17,554 15,653 6,999 9,219 Income from opera- tions................. 16,087 35,003 49,640 43,415 21,818 33,446 Interest expense, net.. 33,363 31,356 39,889 48,219 22,113 31,273 Extraordinary gain (loss) (a)............ -- (38,205) 4,120 -- (9,250) -- Net income (loss) (b).. (29,230) (35,787) 9,338 (8,870) (11,033) (1,921) OTHER DATA: EBITDA (c)............. $ 44,000 $ 60,399 $ 68,241 $ 60,524 $ 29,011 $ 42,942 Capital expenditures (d)................... 5,509 8,643 10,052 20,489 7,364 115,430 Ratio of earnings to fixed charges (defi- ciency) (e)........... (32,094) 1.1x 1.1x (9,735) (1,944) (2,010) Cash flows provided by (used in) Operating activities... 9,514 $ 26,191 $ 21,820 19,950 $ 22,758 $ (9,219) Investing activities... (6,175) (10,469) (12,679) (21,691) (7,364) (190,973) Financing activities... (2,870) (7,367) (13,550) (1,508) 1,587 191,214 BALANCE SHEET DATA (AT END OF PERIODS): Total assets........... $378,398 $370,349 $374,498 $375,643 $394,085 $ 584,545 Total long-term debt, net of current maturities (f)........ 33,326 249,723 395,948 403,214 331,142 494,471 Total capital (defi- cit).................. 54,043 11,362 (54,710) (63,580) (74,613) 50,591 [Enlarge/Download Table] YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, --------------------------------------------------------------- 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) OPERATING DATA (AT END OF PERIOD): (g) Casino square footage.. 60,000 60,000 60,000 73,000(h) 73,604 Number of hotel rooms.. 557 557 557 555 732 Hotel occupancy rate... 87.1% 86.9% 87.6% 88.6% 89.7% TABLE GAMES: Total Atlantic City table drop (i)........ $7,219,192 $7,055,034 $6,835,572 $6,832,517 $7,110,612 Atlantic City table drop growth........... (8.7)% (2.3)% (3.1)% 0.0% 4.1% Trump Plaza table drop (i)................... $ 646,480 $ 689,919 $ 626,621 $ 599,881 $ 626,832 Trump Plaza table games market share (j)...... 9.0% 9.8% 9.2% 8.8% 8.8% Trump Plaza table games fair share (k)........ 8.5% 8.2% 7.8% 8.0% 8.6% Trump Plaza table games efficiency (l)........ 105.1% 118.8% 118.0% 110.6% 102.5% Trump Plaza table units................. 112 98 87 89 97 Trump Plaza table revenue............... $ 98,905 $ 95,864 $ 93,392 $ 92,770 $ 96,518 Trump Plaza table revenue per unit per day (actual dollars).. $ 2,419 $ 2,679 $ 2,940 $ 2,855 $ 2,726 SLOTS: Total Atlantic City slot revenue (m)...... $1,851,070 $2,113,829 $2,214,638 $2,297,280 $2,572,719 Atlantic City slot revenue growth........ 7.4% 14.2% 4.8% 3.7% 12.0% Trump Plaza slot revenue (m)........... $ 136,128 $ 168,388 $ 173,215 $ 170,316 $ 204,230 Trump Plaza slot market share (j)............. 7.4% 8.0% 7.8% 7.4% 7.9% Trump Plaza slot fair share (k)............. 7.8% 7.8% 7.6% 8.0% 8.2% Trump Plaza slot efficiency (l)........ 94.5% 102.6% 103.1% 92.5% 96.7% Trump Plaza slot units................. 1,659 1,727 1,812 2,076 2,339 Trump Plaza slot revenue per unit per day (actual dollars) (m).......... $ 225 $ 267 $ 262 $ 225 $ 239 (footnotes on the following page) 12
424B113th Page of 203TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 13th
[Download Table] THE COMPANY PRO FORMA (n) ---------------------------- YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1995 (NOTE 1) ---------------------------- (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS DATA: (UNAUDITED) Net revenues..................................... $ 887,069 Depreciation and amortization.................... 64,752 Income from operations........................... 149,681 Interest expense, net (o) (excludes amortization of deferred financing costs).................... 153,097 Net Loss ........................................ (10,554) Net Loss per common share (p).................... ($0.45) OTHER DATA: EBITDA (c)(o).................................... $ 217,994 Ratio of earnings to fixed charges (deficiency) (e)............................................. (13,943) CASH FLOWS PROVIDED BY (USED IN)(q): Operating activities............................. 86,594 Investing activities............................. (230,908) Financing activities............................. 191,772 BALANCE SHEET DATA (AT END OF PERIOD): Total assets..................................... $1,863,429 Total long-term debt, net of current maturities.. 1,368,128 Total capital.................................... 374,975 Note 1: The Company was incorporated on March 28, 1995 and conducted no operations until June 12, 1995, when the Company issued $140 million of Common Stock (the "June 1995 Stock Offering" and together with the offering by THCR Holdings and THCR Funding (as defined) of $155 million aggregate principal amount of Senior Secured Notes due 2005 (the "Senior Notes") (the "June 1995 Note Offering") (the "June 1995 Offerings")) and contributed the proceeds from the June 1995 Stock Offering to THCR Holdings in exchange for an approximately 60% general partnership interest in THCR Holdings. At the consummation of the June 1995 Stock Offering, pursuant to the Contribution Agreement, dated as of June 12, 1995, between Trump and THCR Holdings (the "Contribution Agreement"), Trump contributed his 100% beneficial interest in Plaza Funding, Trump AC and Plaza Associates to THCR Holdings, among other things, for an approximate 40% limited partnership interest in THCR Holdings. The financial data as of December 31, 1995 and for the period ended December 31, 1995 reflect the operations of the Company from inception (June 12, 1995) to December 31, 1995. -------- (a) The extraordinary loss for the year ended December 31, 1992 consists of the effect of stating Plaza Funding's Preferred Stock issued at fair value as compared to the carrying value of these securities and the write off of certain deferred financing charges and costs. The excess of the carrying value of a note obligation over the amount of the settlement payment net of related prepaid expenses in the amount of $4,120,000 has been reported as an extraordinary gain for the year ended December 31, 1993. The extraordinary loss of $9,250,000 for the period from January 1, 1995 through June 12, 1995 relates to the redemption of the 12 1/2% Pay-in-Kind Notes due 2003 of Trump AC (the "PIK Notes") and related warrants to acquire PIK Notes (the "PIK Note Warrants") and the write off of related unamortized deferred financing costs. (b) Net loss for the year ended December 31, 1991, includes a $10.9 million charge associated with the rejection of the lease of the former Trump Regency Hotel and $4.0 million of costs associated with certain litigation. Net income (loss) for 1992 includes $1.5 million of costs associated with certain litigation. Net income (loss) for the years ended December 31, 1993, 1994, for the period from January 1, 1995 through June 12, 1995 and for the period from inception (June 12, 1995) to December 31, 1995, includes $3.9, $4.9, $1.6 and $2.1 million, respectively, of real estate taxes and leasing costs associated with Trump Plaza East. (c) EBITDA represents income from operations before interest expense, taxes, depreciation, amortization, restructuring costs, non-cash compensation charges associated with awards to the President of the Company under the 1995 Stock Incentive Plan, and the non-cash write-down of New Jersey Casino Reinvestment Development Authority ("CRDA") investments. EBITDA should not be construed as an alternative to net income or any other measure of performance determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles or as an indicator of the Company's operating performance, liquidity or cash flows generated by operating, investing and financing activities. Management has included information concerning EBITDA as management understands that it is used by certain investors as one measure of the Company's historical ability to service its debt. (d) Capital expenditures attributable to Trump Plaza East were approximately $2.8 million, $8.7 million, $4.9 million, and $20.0 million for the years ended December 31, 1993 and 1994 for the period January 1 through June 12, 1995 and for the period June 12, 1995 through December 31, 1995. Capital expenditures attributable to Trump World's Fair were approximately $73.7 million for the period June 12, 1995 through December 31, 1995. Capital expenditures for improvements to existing facilities were $7.3 million, $11.8 million and $11.2 million for the years ended December 31, 1993, 1994 and 1995. (e) For purposes of computing this ratio, earnings consist of loss before income taxes, extraordinary items, minority interest and fixed charges, adjusted to exclude capitalized interest. Fixed charges consist of interest expense, including amounts capitalized, preferred partnership distribution requirements and the portion of operating lease rental expense that is representative of the interest factor (deemed to be one-third of operating lease rental expense). Earnings were insufficient to cover fixed charges for the years ended 1991, 1994, for the period January 1, 1995 through June 12, 1995, for the period June 12, 1995 through December 31, 1995 and on a pro forma basis for the year ended December 31, 1995. 13
424B114th Page of 203TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 14th
(f) Reflects reclassification in 1991 of indebtedness relating to outstanding mortgage bonds as a current liability due to then existing events of default. (g) Atlantic City industry data has been compiled from information filed with and published by the CCC (as defined) and is unaudited. (h) The expansion of 13,000 square feet was commenced in April 1994 and completed at the end of that year. (i) Table drop represents the total dollar value of chips purchased for table games for the period indicated. (j) Market share represents the total Trump Plaza table drop or slot revenues, as applicable, expressed as a percentage of total Atlantic City table drop or slot revenue, as applicable. (k) Fair share is the percentage of the total number of gaming units (table games or slot machines, as applicable) in Trump Plaza to the total number of such units in casino hotels in Atlantic City. (l) Efficiency is the ratio of Trump Plaza's market share to its fair share. (m) Slot revenue is shown on the cash basis and excludes amounts reserved for progressive jackpot accruals. (n) The Pro Forma Statement of Operations Data and Other Data give effect to the Merger Transaction as if the same had occurred on January 1, 1995 and the Pro Forma Balance Sheet Data gives effect to the Merger Transaction as if the same had occurred on December 31, 1995. (o) Does not give effect to any return on investment of the net proceeds of the June 1995 Offerings. (p) Pro forma loss per share is based upon weighted average shares outstanding as of December 31, 1995, shares and phantom stock units awarded to the President of the Company pursuant to the 1995 Stock Incentive Plan and shares to be issued in the Company Stock Offering. The shares of the Company Class B Common Stock owned by Trump have no economic interest and therefore, are not considered. (q) Pro forma cash flows give effect to the June 1995 Offerings. 14
424B115th Page of 203TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 15th
SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION OF TAJ ASSOCIATES The following table sets forth certain historical consolidated financial information of Taj Associates for each of the five years ended December 31, 1991 through 1995. The financial information of Taj Associates as of December 31, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 and 1995 and for the years then ended set forth below has been derived from the audited consolidated financial statements of Taj Associates. The audited financial information as of December 31, 1994 and 1995 and for the years ended December 31, 1993, 1994 and 1995 are included elsewhere in this Prospectus. The audited financial information as of December 31, 1991, 1992 and 1993 and for the years ended December 31, 1991 and 1992 has been derived from the audited consolidated financial statements of Taj Associates not included herein. This information should be read in conjunction with "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Conditions and Results of Operations--Taj Associates," "Unaudited Pro Forma Financial Information" and the consolidated financial statements and the related notes thereto included elsewhere in this Prospectus. [Enlarge/Download Table] YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, ------------------------------------------------------------- 1991(a) 1992 1993 1994 1995 ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS DATA: Net Revenues........... $ 438,313 $ 469,753 $ 498,911 $ 517,182 $ 553,748 Depreciation and amortization.......... 36,202 36,388 36,858 39,750 43,387 Income from operations............ 31,828 68,027 84,458 76,634 89,890 Interest expense, net.. (100,683) (103,126) (106,997) (113,292) (116,513) Extraordinary gain..... 259,618 0 0 0 0 Net income (loss)...... 188,513 (35,099) (22,539) (36,658) (26,623) OTHER DATA: EBITDA(b).............. $ 99,883 $ 111,022 $ 128,371 $ 127,796 $ 140,835 Capital expenditures... 17,045 12,111 16,752 23,030 26,498 Ratio of earnings to fixed charges (deficiency)(c)....... (71,105) (35,099) (22,539) (36,658) (26,623) Cash flows provided by (used in) Operating Activities.. 35,126 31,786 48,634 33,422 62,899 Investing Activities... (18,901) (17,759) (22,160) (27,231) (32,571) Financing Activities... (16,170) (2,500) (2,492) (3,039) (2,583) BALANCE SHEET DATA (AT END OF PERIOD): Total assets........... $ 814,051 $ 802,556 $ 811,508 $ 807,612 $ 821,793 Total long-term debt, net of current maturities(d)......... 573,844 595,682 625,765 656,701 694,192 Total capital.......... 167,837 130,913 106,641 67,812 39,635 OPERATING DATA (AT END OF PERIOD)(E): Casino square footage.. 120,000 120,000 130,110 132,317 132,856 Number of hotel rooms.. 1,250 1,250 1,250 1,250 1,250 Hotel occupancy rate... 87.3 % 91.3 % 92.3 % 92.4% 91.2% TABLE GAMES: Total Atlantic City table drop(f)......... $7,219,192 $7,055,034 $6,835,572 $6,832,517 $7,110,612 Atlantic City table drop growth........... (8.7)% (2.3)% (3.1)% 0.0% 4.1% Taj Mahal table drop(f)............... $1,160,714 $1,067,595 $1,062,042 $1,125,029 $1,192,200 Taj Mahal table games market share(g)....... 16.1 % 15.1 % 15.5 % 16.5% 16.8% Taj Mahal table games fair share(h)......... 12.7 % 13.3 % 14.5 % 14.2% 13.3% Taj Mahal table games efficiency(i)......... 126.8 % 113.5 % 106.9 % 116.2% 126.3% Taj Mahal table units.. 166 159 163 159 150 Taj Mahal table revenue............... $ 186,644 $ 169,112 $ 173,432 $ 184,774 $ 201,817 Taj Mahal table revenue per unit per day (actual dollars)...... 3,080 2,913 2,915 3,184 3,686 15
424B116th Page of 203TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 16th
[Download Table] YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, ---------------------------------------------------------- 1991(a) 1992 1993 1994 1995 ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) SLOTS: Total Atlantic City slot revenue(j)....... $1,851,070 $2,113,829 $2,214,638 $2,297,280 $2,572,719 Atlantic City slot rev- enue growth........... 7.4% 14.2% 4.8% 3.7% 12.0% Taj Mahal slot revenue(j)............ $ 197,383 $ 246,947 $ 264,504 $ 259,114 $ 285,248 Taj Mahal slot market share(g).............. 10.7% 11.7% 11.9% 11.3% 11.1% Taj Mahal slot fair share(h).............. 13.0% 12.7% 13.1% 12.6% 12.3% Taj Mahal slot efficiency(i)......... 82.3% 92.1% 90.8% 89.7% 90.2% Taj Mahal slot units... 2,778 2,840 3,146 3,342 3,514 Taj Mahal slot revenue per unit per day (ac- tual dollars)(j)...... $ 195 $ 238 $ 230 $ 213 $ 222 -------------------- (a) Taj Associates and Taj Funding completed the 1991 Taj Restructuring (as defined) on October 4, 1991, which may affect the comparability of prior periods. (b) EBITDA represents income from operations before depreciation, amortization, restructuring costs, the non-cash write-down of CRDA investments, a nonrecurring cost of a litigation settlement in 1994, lease payments on the Specified Parcels and payments under the Taj Services Agreement. In connection with the Merger Transaction, the lease payments and payments under the Taj Services Agreement (as defined) will be terminated. EBITDA should not be construed as an alternative to net income or any other measure of performance determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles or as an indicator of Taj Associates' operating performance, liquidity or cash flows generated by operating, investing and financing activities. Management has included information concerning EBITDA, as management understands that it is used by certain investors as one measure of Taj Associates' historical ability to service its debt. (c) For purposes of computing this ratio, earnings consist of loss before income taxes and extraordinary items and fixed charges, adjusted to exclude capitalized interest. Fixed charges consist of interest expense, including amounts capitalized, partnership distribution requirements and the portion of operating lease rental expense that is representative of the interest factor (deemed to be one-third of operating lease rental expense). (d) The years ended December 31, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 and 1995 include approximately $528,124, $550,140, $580,464, $611,533 and $649,139 of Taj Bonds, net of discount of approximately $201,334, $188,162, $172,417, $153,597 and $131,103, respectively, which is being accreted as additional interest expense to maturity and results in an effective interest rate of approximately 18.0%. See Note 2 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements of Taj Associates. The carrying value of the Taj Bonds was $611,533 and $649,139, at December 31, 1994 and 1995, respectively, with a face value of $765,130 and $780,242, respectively. (e) Atlantic City industry data has been compiled from information filed with and published by the CCC and is unaudited. (f) Table drop represents the total dollar value of chips purchased for table games for the period indicated. (g) Market share represents the total Taj Mahal table drop or slot revenues, as applicable, expressed as a percentage of total Atlantic City table drop or slot revenues, as applicable. (h) Fair share is the percentage of the total number of gaming units (table games or slot machines, as applicable) in the Taj Mahal to the total number of such units in casinos in Atlantic City. (i) Efficiency is the ratio of the Taj Mahal's market share to its fair share. (j) Slot revenue is shown on the cash basis and excludes amounts reserved for progressive jackpot accruals. 16
424B117th Page of 203TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 17th
THE MERGER TRANSACTION Upon consummation of the Merger Transaction, the Company will own and operate the Taj Mahal and Trump Plaza. Pursuant to the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of January 8, 1996, as amended by Amendment to Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of January 31, 1996, among the Company, Taj Holding and THCR Merger Corp. ("Merger Sub") (the "Merger Agreement"), (a) Merger Sub will be merged with and into Taj Holding and (b) each outstanding share of Taj Holding Class A Common Stock will be converted into the right to receive, at each holder's election, either (i) $30.00 in cash ("Cash Consideration") or (ii) that number of shares of the Company's Common Stock as is determined by dividing $30.00 by the Market Value ("Stock Consideration"). Market Value is defined as the average of the high and low per share sales prices on the NYSE of a share of Common Stock on a random selection of ten trading days within the fifteen trading day period ending five trading days immediately preceding the effective time of the Merger (the "Effective Time") ($28.8125 assuming an April 17, 1996 Effective Time). In addition to the Merger, the Stock Offering and the Mortgage Note Offering, the Merger Transaction includes the transactions discussed below. Real Property Purchases. Upon consummation of the Merger Transaction,Trump AC intends to purchase from Trump Taj Mahal Realty Corp. ("Realty Corp."), a corporation wholly owned by Trump, certain real property used in the operation of the Taj Mahal, including land underlying a 20,000 square foot-multi-purpose entertainment complex known as the Xanadu Theater with a seating capacity for approximately 1,200 people, which can be used as a theater, concert hall, boxing arena or exhibition hall (the "Taj Entertainment Complex"), land adjacent to the Taj Mahal used by it for surface parking and bus terminals, the pier located across The Boardwalk from the Taj Mahal (the "Steel Pier"), and a warehouse complex (collectively, the "Specified Parcels"). The Specified Parcels are currently leased by Taj Associates from Realty Corp. for approximately $3.3 million per year. See "Business--Certain Indebtedness--Taj Associates--First Fidelity Loan/Specified Parcels." Realty Corp. has outstanding indebtedness of approximately $78 million under the First Fidelity Loan which is due November 15, 1999. The First Fidelity Loan is currently secured by a mortgage on the Specified Parcels, and Taj Associates has previously guaranteed the repayment of the First Fidelity Loan up to a maximum of $30 million. Trump has also previously personally guaranteed (up to a maximum of approximately $19.2 million), and pledged his direct and indirect equity interests in Taj Associates as collateral for, the First Fidelity Loan. As mortgagee, First Fidelity has the right to terminate the lease on the Specified Parcels under certain circumstances. See "Business--Certain Indebtedness--Taj Associates--First Fidelity Loan/Specified Parcels." In order to secure future use of the Specified Parcels and eliminate all future lease payments on the Specified Parcels, Taj Associates expects to satisfy the First Fidelity Loan through the payment of $50 million in cash and 500,000 shares of Common Stock and purchase the Specified Parcels from Realty Corp. for ten dollars by exercising a purchase option with respect to the Specified Parcels. Upon consummation of the purchase of the Specified Parcels, (i) the lease relating to the Specified Parcels will be terminated, thus eliminating Taj Associates' rental obligations thereunder; (ii) the $30 million guaranty by Taj Associates of the First Fidelity Loan will be released; and (iii) Trump's guaranty of such indebtedness will be released and First Fidelity will relinquish its lien on Trump's direct and indirect equity interests in Taj Associates. The Specified Parcels will be part of the collateral securing the Mortgage Notes. See "Business--Certain Indebtedness--Taj Associates--First Fidelity Loan/Specified Parcels." Pursuant to the Trump Plaza East Purchase Option, Plaza Associates has the right to purchase Trump Plaza East for a purchase price of $28.0 million through December 31, 1996, increasing by $1.0 million annually thereafter until expiration on June 30, 1998. Plaza Associates intends to exercise the Trump Plaza East Purchase Option in connection with the Merger Transaction and purchase Trump Plaza East, thereby eliminating approximately $3.1 million of annual lease payments associated with Trump Plaza East. Plaza Associates will thereby secure future use of Trump Plaza East. Should Plaza Associates be unable to finance the purchase price of Trump Plaza East pursuant to the Trump Plaza East Purchase Option and its leasehold interest therein is terminated, any amounts expended with respect to Trump Plaza East and any improvements thereon would inure to the benefit of the unaffiliated third party that owns Trump Plaza East and not to Plaza Associates. As a result of such purchase, Trump will obtain a release of a contingent debt obligation, which, if the conditions thereunder are not satisfied (including, without limitation, the failure by Plaza Associates to exercise the Trump Plaza East Purchase Option), 17
424B118th Page of 203TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 18th
would result in an obligation of Trump for approximately $18 million which obligation was associated with Trump's original purchase of Trump Plaza East. See "Business--Properties--Trump Plaza--Trump Plaza East." Consent and Release Payment. The Trump Indebtedness is currently secured by, among other things, a lien on Trump's direct and indirect equity interests in Taj Associates, as well as the pledge of a promissory note from TTMI, a corporation wholly owned by Trump and the holder of a 49.995% general partnership interest in Taj Associates, to Trump (the "TTMI Note"). As part of the Merger Transaction, Taj Associates will pay $10 million to Bankers Trust to obtain the consent of Bankers Trust to the Merger Transaction and to obtain releases of certain liens on Trump's direct and indirect equity interests in Taj Associates and related guarantees, and on the TTMI Note, all of which secure a portion of the Trump Indebtedness. See "Business--Certain Indebtedness--Taj Associates--TTMI Note." Plaza Note Purchase; Consent Solicitations. As part of the Merger Transaction, Plaza Funding will retire the Plaza Notes. Any such purchase of Plaza Notes will be conditioned upon, among other things, the concurrent consummation of the other transactions contemplated by the Merger Transaction. Plaza Associates and Plaza Funding solicited the consent of holders of the Plaza Notes (the "Plaza Note Consent Solicitation") to amend certain provisions in the indenture pursuant to which the Plaza Notes were issued (the "Plaza Note Indenture"). The requisite number of consents has been obtained. To effect the Merger Transaction, THCR Holdings and its subsidiary Trump Hotels & Casino Resorts Funding, Inc. ("THCR Funding"), the issuers of the Senior Notes, solicited from the holders of the Senior Notes the waiver of, and consent to modify, certain provisions of the indenture pursuant to which the Senior Notes were issued (the "Senior Note Indenture") (the "Senior Note Consent Solicitation"). Consent of holders of a majority in aggregate principal amount of outstanding Senior Notes was received in connection with the Senior Note Consent Solicitation. The successful completion of both the Plaza Note Consent Solicitation and the Senior Note Consent Solicitation are conditions to the consummation of the Stock Offering. Trump Contribution and Consideration. In connection with the Merger Transaction, Trump will contribute or cause to be contributed all of his direct and indirect equity interests in Taj Associates (representing a 50% economic interest) to Trump AC (on behalf, and at the direction, of THCR Holdings). Trump will contribute to Trump AC his shares (consisting of 50% of the outstanding capital stock) of The Trump Taj Mahal Corporation, the holder of a .01% general partnership interest in Taj Associates ("TTMC"), and will cause TTMI to contribute to Trump AC (on behalf, and at the direction, of THCR Holdings) TTMI's 49.995% general partnership interest in Taj Associates. In addition, Trump will contribute to Taj Holding all of his shares of Class C Common Stock of Taj Holding ("Taj Holding Class C Common Stock") which will be canceled pursuant to the Merger Agreement. The Taj Holding Class C Common Stock provides Trump with the ability to elect a majority of the members of the Board of Directors of, and thereby control, Taj Holding. It also affords Trump separate class voting rights in certain events, including in connection with the Merger. The Taj Services Agreement, pursuant to which Trump has received approximately $1.7 million, $1.4 million and $1.6 million (less $575,000 which was paid annually by Trump to First Fidelity to reduce the amount owed by Taj Associates under the lease for the Specified Parcels) in respect of the years ended 1995, 1994 and 1993, respectively, as compensation for services rendered to Taj Associates, will also be terminated in connection with the Merger Transaction. In exchange for the contribution by Trump and TTMI to Trump AC (on behalf, and at the direction, of THCR Holdings), Trump's directly held limited partnership interest in THCR Holdings will be modified and TTMI will receive a limited partnership interest in THCR Holdings. As a result of the Merger Transaction, Trump's aggregate beneficial ownership of limited partnership interests in THCR Holdings will decrease from approximately 40% to approximately 26%, of which an approximately 5% interest will be held directly by TTMI. 18
424B119th Page of 203TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 19th
Trump's current limited partnership interest in THCR Holdings represents his economic interest in the assets and operations of THCR Holdings and is convertible, at Trump's option, into 6,666,667 shares of Common Stock (representing approximately 40% of the outstanding shares of Common Stock after giving effect to such conversion). Upon consummation of the Merger Transaction Trump's and TTMI's limited partnership interests in THCR Holdings will be convertible into an aggregate of 8,072,307 shares of Common Stock, representing approximately 26% of the then outstanding shares of Common Stock (after giving effect to the Merger Transaction and such conversion). At the time that TTMI becomes a limited partner of THCR Holdings, Trump will contribute 200 shares of Class B Common Stock of the Company, par value $.01 per share ("Class B Common Stock") to TTMI. The Company's Class B Common Stock has voting power equivalent to the voting power of the Common Stock into which a Class B Common Stockholder's limited partnership interest in THCR Holdings is convertible. The Class B Common Stock is not entitled to dividends or distributions. Upon conversion of all or any portion of a holder's THCR Holdings limited partnership interest into shares of Common Stock, the corresponding voting power of such holders's Class B Common Stock (equal in voting power to the number of shares of Common Stock issued upon such conversion) will be proportionately diminished. Concurrent with the consummation of the Merger Transaction, the Company will issue to Trump a warrant to purchase an aggregate of 1.8 million shares of Common Stock, (i) 600,000 shares of which may be purchased on or prior to the third anniversary of the issuance of the warrant at $30.00 per share, (ii) 600,000 shares of which may be purchased on or prior to the fourth anniversary of the issuance of the warrant at $35.00 per share and (iii) 600,000 shares of which may be purchased on or prior to the fifth anniversary of the issuance of the warrant at $40.00 per share. Trump, through TTMI, has the right to reduce the equity interest of the Taj Holding Class A Common Stock in Taj Associates from 50% to 20% by causing Taj Associates to make a payment to the holders of the Taj Bonds in an amount calculated to provide them with a cumulative return equal to approximately 14% per annum (the "14% Payment"). If the 14% Payment is made (which can occur only if the Taj Bonds are retired, redeemed or paid in full), Trump would beneficially own 80% of Taj Associates. Moreover, the 14% Payment is permitted to be financed with Taj Associates' borrowings. In connection with the Merger Transaction, TTMI will not exercise its right to cause Taj Associates to make such payment and such right will terminate upon the redemption of the Taj Bonds. The Company Contribution and Consideration. In connection with the Merger Transaction, the Company will cause TM/GP Corporation ("TM/GP"), which will become an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of the Company after the Effective Time and which holds a 49.995% general partnership interest in Taj Associates, to contribute to Trump AC (on behalf, and at the direction, of THCR Holdings) its general partnership interest in Taj Associates, and will cause Taj Holding, which will become a direct wholly owned subsidiary of the Company after the Effective Time, to contribute to TM/GP and will then cause TM/GP to contribute to Trump AC (on behalf, and at the direction, of THCR Holdings) its shares (consisting of 50% of the outstanding capital stock) of TTMC (the holder of a .01% general partnership in Taj Associates). As a result of the Merger Transaction, the Company's beneficial equity interest in THCR Holdings will increase from approximately 60% to approximately 74%, of which an approximately 5% interest will be held directly by TM/GP. Redemption of the Taj Bonds and the Taj Holding Class B Common Stock. The Taj Holding Class B Common Stock is essentially a nonparticipating stock issued as part of a unit ("Unit"), consisting of $1,000 principal amount of Taj Bonds and one share of Taj Holding Class B Common Stock, that entitles the holders thereof to elect the Class B Directors, to vote on matters presented to the stockholders of Taj Holding and to separately approve certain matters. The Taj Holding Certificate of Incorporation provides that the outstanding shares of Taj Holding Class B Common Stock must be redeemed at such time as the principal amount of Taj 19
424B120th Page of 203TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 20th
Bonds are redeemed, defeased or paid, at the redemption price of $.50 per share. In connection with the Merger Transaction, Taj Funding will redeem the outstanding Taj Bonds at a redemption price equal to 100% of the principal amount thereof plus accrued interest to the date of redemption and Taj Holding will cause each outstanding share of Taj Holding Class B Common Stock to be redeemed at the redemption price of $.50 per share in accordance with the provisions of the Taj Holding Certificate of Incorporation. MANAGEMENT AND CORPORATE STRUCTURE Trump is the Company's Chairman of the Board and Nicholas L. Ribis is the Company's President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer. The Company is a holding company with no independent operations, the principal asset of which is its general partnership interest in THCR Holdings. THCR Holdings is also a holding company with no independent operations. THCR Holdings' principal assets are its ownership interests in its subsidiary corporations and partnerships. The partnership agreement governing THCR Holdings provides that all business activities of the Company must be conducted through THCR Holdings or its subsidiary corporations and partnerships. As the sole general partner of THCR Holdings, the Company generally has the exclusive rights, responsibilities and discretion in the management and control of THCR Holdings. THCR Holdings' subsidiary corporations and partnerships currently include Trump Indiana, Plaza Associates, Plaza Funding, Trump AC (formerly Trump Plaza Holding Associates), Trump Plaza Holding, Inc. ("Plaza Holding Inc."), Trump AC Funding and Trump Hotels & Casino Resorts Funding, Inc. ("THCR Funding"). THCR Funding and THCR Holdings are the co-obligors of the Senior Notes. Plaza Associates owns and operates Trump Plaza and is the guarantor of Plaza Funding's 10 7/8% First Mortgage Notes due 2001 (the "Plaza Notes"). Plaza Funding is the issuer of the Plaza Notes and currently owns a 1% equity interest in Plaza Associates which will be transferred to TTMC in connection with the Merger Transaction. The Plaza Notes will be retired in connection with the Merger Transaction. Trump AC currently owns a 99% equity interest in Plaza Associates, and Plaza Holding Inc. owns a 1% equity interest in Trump AC. In addition to its ownership of the Indiana Riverboat, Trump Indiana has a 50% equity interest in Buffington Harbor Riverboats, LLC ("BHR"), which will own, develop and operate all common land-based and waterside operations in support of the Indiana Riverboat and another operator's riverboat casino at Buffington Harbor. Upon consummation of the Merger Transaction, THCR Holdings will indirectly wholly own Taj Associates through its ownership of a 99% equity interest in Trump AC and all of the capital stock of Plaza Holding Inc., which owns a 1% equity interest in Trump AC. Trump AC will wholly own Taj Associates through its ownership of a 99% equity interest in Taj Associates and all of the capital stock of TTMC, which will own a 1% equity interest in Taj Associates. Trump AC and its subsidiary Trump Atlantic City Funding will be the issuers and co- obligors of the Mortgage Notes. Plaza Associates and Taj Associates will be guarantors of the Mortgage Notes. The Company, a Delaware corporation, was incorporated on March 28, 1995. The principal executive offices of the Company are located at Mississippi Avenue and The Boardwalk, Atlantic City, New Jersey 08401, and the Company's telephone number is (609) 441-6060. 20
424B121st Page of 203TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 21st
PRO FORMA STRUCTURE OF THE COMPANY [CHART APPEARS HERE] (1) Trump's and TTMI's economic interest in the Company will be held through limited partnership interests in THCR Holdings. The Class B Common Stock will represent Trump's and TTMI's non-economic voting interest in the Company, which will be proportionate to their respective economic interest in THCR Holdings. (2) Assumes a price of $24.00 per share of Common Stock as the Market Value in connection with the Merger and as the public offering price in the Stock Offering. (3) Co-issuers of the Mortgage Notes. (4) Guarantors of the Mortgage Notes. 21
424B122nd Page of 203TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 22nd
RISK FACTORS Each prospective investor should consider carefully all information contained in this Prospectus and should give particular consideration to the following factors before deciding to purchase shares of Common Stock offered hereby. HIGH LEVERAGE AND FIXED CHARGES Upon consummation of the Merger Transaction, the Company and its subsidiaries will have a substantial amount of indebtedness on a consolidated basis. At December 31, 1995, after giving pro forma effect to the Merger Transaction, the Company's consolidated indebtedness for borrowed money would have totaled approximately $1.37 billion, including $155 million aggregate principal amount of Senior Notes and $1.20 billion aggregate principal amount of Mortgage Notes (collectively, the "Notes"). See "Use of Proceeds" and "Business--Certain Indebtedness." Assuming that the Merger Transaction had been consummated on January 1, 1995, the Company's earnings would have been insufficient to cover fixed charges by $13.9 million on a pro forma basis for the year ended December 31, 1995. Interest on the Senior Notes is, and interest on the Mortgage Notes will be, payable semiannually in cash. The ability of THCR Holdings and Trump AC to pay interest on the Senior Notes and the Mortgage Notes, respectively, will be dependent upon the ability of the Company and its subsidiaries (in the case of the Senior Notes) and Trump AC and its subsidiaries (in the case of the Mortgage Notes) to generate enough cash from operations sufficient for such purposes and will be subject to the risks associated with refinancing and repayment of indebtedness described below. See "--Holding Company Structure; No Anticipation of Dividends," "--Risk in Refinancing and Repayment of Indebtedness; Need for Additional Financing," "--Historical Results; Past Net Losses--Trump Plaza," and "--Historical Results; Past Net Losses--Taj Mahal." Taj Associates has a working capital facility (the "Working Capital Facility") which matures in 1999 and permits borrowings of up to $25 million. During 1994 and 1995, no amounts were borrowed under the Working Capital Facility. Taj Associates will terminate the Working Capital Facility in connection with the consummation of the Merger Transaction and the Company anticipates replacing it with a new $25 million facility which would be available to Trump AC and its subsidiaries, although there can be no assurance that a replacement facility could be obtained on acceptable terms, if at all. See "--Risk in Refinancing and Repayment of Indebtedness; Need for Additional Financing" and "Business--Certain Indebtedness--Taj Associates--Working Capital Facility." The substantial consolidated indebtedness and fixed charges of the Company may limit its ability to respond to changing business and economic conditions, to fund capital expenditures for future expansion or otherwise, either through cash flow or additional indebtedness, to absorb adverse operating results or to maintain its facilities at an operating level that will continue to attract patrons. Although management believes that the Merger Transaction will allow the Company to realize certain cost savings (expected by management to be approximately $18-20 million by the end of the second year following the Merger Transaction), no assurance can be given as to the amount, if any, that will be realized from these cost savings. Future operating results are subject to significant business, economic, regulatory and competitive uncertainties and contingencies, many of which are outside its control. The Company may be required to reduce or delay planned capital expenditures, sell assets, restructure debt or raise additional equity to meet principal repayment and other obligations of it and its subsidiaries in later years. See "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations-- Liquidity and Capital Resources." There is no assurance that any of these alternatives could be effected on satisfactory terms, if at all. See "-- Holding Company Structure; No Anticipation of Dividends" and "--Risk in Refinancing and Repayment of Indebtedness; Need for Additional Financing." Furthermore, such alternatives could impair the Company's competitive position, reduce cash flow and/or have a material adverse effect on the Company's results of operations. See "--Atlantic City Properties Expansion." HOLDING COMPANY STRUCTURE; NO ANTICIPATION OF DIVIDENDS The Company is a holding company, the principal asset of which is its general partnership interest in THCR Holdings, and has no independent means of generating revenue. As a holding company, the Company depends on distributions and other permitted payments from THCR Holdings to meet its cash needs. 22
424B123rd Page of 203TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 23rd
In addition, both THCR Holdings and Trump AC are holding companies, the principal assets of which are the shares of capital stock and partnership interest of their respective subsidiaries. Dividends and distributions received with respect to equity interests in subsidiaries of THCR Holdings and Trump AC are the sole source of funds which are available to THCR Holdings and Trump AC to meet their respective obligations, including the obligations under the Senior Notes by THCR Holdings and the obligations under the Mortgage Notes by Trump AC. The payment of dividends and distributions by the Company's subsidiaries including THCR Holdings, however, is significantly restricted by certain covenants contained in debt agreements and other agreements to which such subsidiaries are subject and may be restricted by other agreements entered into in the future and by applicable law. However, the terms of the Mortgage Notes will, under certain circumstances and subject to certain limitations, require Trump AC to make distributions to THCR Holdings to enable THCR Holdings to make scheduled interest payments on its Senior Notes. See "-- Restrictions on Certain Activities" and "Description of the THCR Holdings Partnership Agreement." Further, the ability of Plaza Associates to make payments of dividends or distributions (except for payment of interest) through Trump AC to THCR Holdings may be restricted by the CCC. Trump Indiana may be similarly restricted by, among other things, the Indiana Gaming Commission (the "IGC"). See "Regulatory Matters." In the event that THCR Holdings and Trump AC are not able to meet scheduled payments of interest and principal, with respect to the Senior Notes or the Mortgage Notes, the value of the Common Stock would be materially and adversely affected. The Company has never paid a dividend on the Common Stock and does not anticipate paying one in the foreseeable future. RISK IN REFINANCING AND REPAYMENT OF INDEBTEDNESS; NEED FOR ADDITIONAL FINANCING The ability of THCR Holdings and THCR Funding, and Trump AC and Trump AC Funding, to pay their respective indebtedness when due will depend upon the ability of the Company and its subsidiaries (with respect to the Senior Notes) and Trump AC and its subsidiaries (with respect to the Mortgage Notes) to generate cash from operations sufficient for such purpose or to refinance such indebtedness on or before the date on which it becomes due. Management does not currently anticipate being able to generate sufficient cash flow from operations to repay a substantial portion of the principal amount of the Senior Notes or Mortgage Notes. Thus, the repayment of the principal amount of the Notes will likely depend primarily upon the ability to refinance the Notes when due. The future operating performance and the ability to refinance the Notes will be subject to the then prevailing economic conditions, industry conditions and numerous other financial, business and other factors, many of which are beyond the control of the Company. There can be no assurance that the future operating performance of the Company and its subsidiaries will be sufficient to meet these repayment obligations or that the general state of the economy, the status of the capital markets generally or the receptiveness of the capital markets to the gaming industry and to the Company will be conducive to refinancing the Notes or other attempts to raise capital. In the event that the Company is unable to refinance the Notes when due, the value of the Common Stock would be materially and adversely affected. See "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations-- Liquidity and Capital Resources." The cost to the Company for the development of the Indiana Riverboat through the commencement of its operations (expected in the second quarter of 1996), which includes the land, the vessel, gaming equipment, a pavilion for staging and ticketing and restaurant facilities, berthing and support facilities and parking facilities, is expected to be approximately $84 million. The Company initially anticipated spending $59 million prior to the commencement of the Indiana Riverboat's operations for the vessel, gaming equipment and initial berthing and support facilities, and also anticipated spending an additional $27 million in the second phase to be completed by mid-1997, which would feature a pavilion for staging and ticketing and restaurant facilities, berthing and support facilities and expanded parking. To facilitate the Indiana Riverboat's operations from the opening day and to avoid disruptive construction at the site for an additional year, the Company determined to accelerate the second phase of the project, now expected to cost $25 million, and complete both phases prior to commencing operations. The Company anticipates obtaining the additional $25 million in financing to complete the accelerated development of the Indiana Riverboat through the commencement of its operations in the form of $2.5 million in additional vessel financing, $12.5 million in mortgage financing and/or from a working capital 23
424B124th Page of 203TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 24th
facility and $10 million in operating leases. Trump Indiana has entered into an equipment lease for nearly $2.0 million and has signed a letter of intent for an additional equipment lease for $14.2 million (including approximately $8 million for slot machines included in the initial $59 million cost). Trump Indiana is seeking commitments for the remaining financing. During its initial five-year license term, an additional $69 million of funds (consisting of approximately $48 million for construction of a hotel and other amenities and $21 million in infrastructure improvements and other municipal uses) will be required to be spent by Trump Indiana, which is expected to be funded with cash from operations or additional borrowings. See "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations--Liquidity and Capital Resources." The Company contemplates obtaining an aggregate of approximately $17.5 million of equipment financing in connection with the acquisition of slot machines and related gaming equipment for Trump Plaza's existing facilities, Trump World's Fair and Trump Plaza East. Plaza Associates has obtained commitments for $7.2 million of such financing and is seeking commitments for the remainder of the financing. The Taj Mahal Expansion is expected to depend in part on additional debt financing, for which no commitments are in place. In addition, no assurances may be made that Trump AC will successfully replace the Working Capital Facility. Finally, Taj Associates' obligations to make certain improvements with respect to the Steel Pier may require additional financing. See "Business--Properties." The failure of the Company to obtain all or a significant portion of the financings discussed above may have a material adverse effect on the Company. See "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations." RESTRICTIONS ON CERTAIN ACTIVITIES The Senior Note Indenture imposes restrictions on the activities of THCR Holdings and its subsidiaries and the indenture pursuant to which the Mortgage Notes will be issued (the "Mortgage Note Indenture") will impose restrictions on the activities of Trump AC and its subsidiaries. Generally, the restrictions contained in these instruments relate to the incurrence of additional indebtedness, the distribution of cash and/or property to partners, the repayment or repurchase of pari passu or junior securities, investments, mergers and sales of assets and the creation of liens. These restrictions could limit the ability of the Company to respond to changing business and economic conditions. A failure to comply with any of these obligations could also result in an event of default under the Senior Note Indenture or the Mortgage Note Indenture, which could permit acceleration of the Notes and acceleration of certain other indebtedness of the Company under other instruments that may contain cross-acceleration or cross-default provisions. In the event that the Notes are accelerated, the value of the Common Stock would be materially and adversely affected. HISTORICAL RESULTS; PAST NET LOSSES Trump Plaza. Plaza Associates had net losses of $29.2 million, $35.8 million (including an extraordinary loss of $38.2 million) and $8.9 million for the years ended December 31, 1991, 1992 and 1994, respectively, and net income of $9.3 million (including an extraordinary gain of $4.1 million) for the year ended December 31, 1993. For the period from January 1, 1995 through June 12, 1995, Plaza Associates had a net loss of $11.0 million (including an extraordinary loss of $9.3 million). In 1991, Plaza Associates began to experience liquidity problems, principally due to amortization requirements of its long-term debt. On May 29, 1992, Plaza Associates and Plaza Funding completed a restructuring (the "1992 Plaza Restructuring"), the purpose of which was to improve the amortization schedule and extend the maturity of Plaza Associates' indebtedness. Management believes that the deterioration in results experienced in 1990 and 1991 was attributable primarily to a recession in the Northeast and increased industry competition, primarily due to the opening of the Taj Mahal in April 1990, which had a disproportionate impact on Trump Plaza as compared to certain other Atlantic City casinos due in part to the common use of the "Trump" name. See "Business--Business Strategy--Trump Plaza." In June 1993, Plaza Associates, Plaza Funding and THCR Atlantic City completed a refinancing, the purpose of which was to enhance Plaza Associates' liquidity and to position Plaza Associates for a subsequent deleveraging transaction. See "Business--Restructurings--The 1992 Plaza Restructuring." A portion of the proceeds from the June 1995 Offerings was contributed to Plaza Associates to help reduce its indebtedness. 24
424B125th Page of 203TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 25th
Taj Mahal. Taj Associates had net losses of $35.1 million, $22.5 million, $36.7 million and $26.6 million for the years ended December 31, 1992, 1993, 1994 and 1995, respectively. From the opening of the Taj Mahal in April 1990 through the spring of 1991, cash generated from Taj Associates' operations was insufficient to cover its fixed charges. As a result, Taj Associates failed to provide Taj Funding with sufficient funds to meet its debt servicing needs. During 1991, Taj Funding, Taj Associates and Taj Associates' then existing general partners (TTMI and TTMC) restructured their existing indebtedness (the "1991 Taj Restructuring"). Pursuant to the terms of the 1991 Taj Restructuring, Taj Funding's 14% First Mortgage Bonds, Series A, due 1998 (the "Old Taj Bonds") were exchanged for the Taj Bonds and certain modifications were made to the terms of bank borrowings and amounts owed to both Trump and his affiliates. In addition, approximately 50% of the ownership interest in Taj Associates was transferred indirectly to the holders of the Old Taj Bonds. See "Business--Restructurings--The 1991 Taj Restructuring." CONFLICTS OF INTEREST Conflicts Relating to Trump's Ownership of Trump's Castle. Trump is currently the beneficial owner of 100% of Trump's Castle Casino Resort ("Trump's Castle"), which competes directly with the Taj Mahal and Trump Plaza, and Trump could, under certain circumstances, have an incentive to operate Trump's Castle to the competitive detriment of the Taj Mahal and Trump Plaza. Trump and TC/GP, Inc. ("TC/GP"), a corporation beneficially owned by Trump, have entered into a services agreement (the "Trump's Castle Services Agreement") with Trump's Castle Associates ("TCA"), the partnership that owns and operates Trump's Castle, pursuant to which TC/GP has agreed to provide marketing, advertising and promotional and other similar and related services to Trump's Castle. Pursuant to the Trump's Castle Services Agreement, in respect of any matter or matters involving employees, contractors, entertainers, celebrities, vendors, patrons, marketing programs, promotions, special events, or otherwise, Trump will, and will cause his affiliates to the best of his ability and consistent with his fiduciary obligations to TCA, Trump Plaza and the Taj Mahal to, act fairly and in a commercially reasonable manner so that on an annual overall basis (x) neither Trump Plaza nor the Taj Mahal shall realize a competitive advantage over Trump's Castle, by reason of any activity, transaction or action engaged in by Trump or his affiliates and (y) Trump's Castle shall not be discriminated against. Conflicts Relating to Common Officers. Nicholas L. Ribis, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company and Taj Associates, is also the Chief Executive Officer of TCA. Messrs. Robert M. Pickus and John P. Burke, officers of the Company, are each officers of TCA and Taj Associates. In addition, Messrs. Trump, Ribis, Pickus and Burke serve on one or more of the governing bodies of the Company, Taj Holding, TCA and their affiliated entities. As a result of Trump's interests in three competing Atlantic City casino hotels, the common chief executive officer and other common officers, a conflict of interest may be deemed to exist, including by reason of such persons' access to information and business opportunities possibly useful to any or all of such casino hotels. Furthermore, Trump has agreed that he will pursue, develop, control and conduct all new gaming activities through the Company. Although no specific procedures have been devised for resolving conflicts of interest confronting, or which may confront, Trump, such persons and all the casinos affiliated with Trump, Messrs. Trump, Ribis, Pickus and Burke have informed the Company and Taj Holding that they will not engage in any activity which they reasonably expect will harm the Company, Taj Holding or their respective affiliates or is otherwise inconsistent with their obligations as officers and directors of the Company, Taj Holding or their affiliates. See "Management--Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation-- Certain Related Party Transactions of Trump" and "--Other Relationships." CONTROL AND INVOLVEMENT OF TRUMP Trump's Substantial Voting Power. Upon consummation of the Merger Transaction, through his beneficial ownership of the Class B Common Stock, Trump will continue to exercise considerable influence over the affairs 25
424B126th Page of 203TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 26th
of the Company and will control approximately 26% of the total voting power of the Company. The Company believes that the involvement of Trump in the affairs of the Company is an important factor that will affect the prospects of the Company. Following the Merger Transaction, Trump will continue to pursue, develop, control and conduct all of his gaming business (except for Trump's Castle) through the Company. See "--Conflicts of Interest." Trump's Personal Indebtedness. Although Trump has no obligation to contribute funds to the Company or THCR Holdings and is not providing any personal guarantees in connection with the Merger Transaction, management believes that Trump's financial condition and general business success together with the public's perception of such success may be relevant to the success of the Company due, in part, to the marquee value of the "Trump" name. The association of the "Trump" name with high quality amenities and first class service at the Company's properties could be diminished in the event that Trump experienced business reversals or the public perceived such reversals, and accordingly, the value of a holder's shares of Common Stock could be adversely effected. Trump is engaged, through various enterprises, in a wide range of business activities. During 1989 through 1992, certain of Trump's businesses, including businesses for which Trump supplied personal guarantees, experienced financial difficulties that necessitated a comprehensive financial restructuring of certain of his properties and holdings, including Trump's interests in Trump Plaza, Trump's Castle and the Taj Mahal, and his personal indebtedness. See "Management." Since 1990, Trump has engaged in a series of transactions designed to reduce his personal indebtedness. However, Trump will continue to have a substantial amount of personal indebtedness following the Merger Transaction. See "Business-- Properties." Trump will have ongoing requirements to make payments of principal and interest on his outstanding indebtedness following the consummation of the Merger Transaction. In addition, the agreements with respect to Trump's indebtedness generally contain comprehensive covenants and events of default which relate to the operations of certain of his affiliates. If such covenants are breached or if events of default otherwise occur, either of which could occur at any time, such indebtedness could be subject to acceleration by the applicable lenders. Any such acceleration could have a material adverse effect on Trump. Furthermore, a substantial portion of Trump's assets consist of real property or interests in regulated enterprises, which may affect the liquidity of such assets. Trump has advised the Company and Taj Holding that he is actively pursuing all reasonable means of providing for the repayment or rescheduling of such indebtedness. There can be no assurance that Trump will be successful in repaying or rescheduling his indebtedness or that his assets will appreciate sufficiently to provide a source of repayment for such indebtedness. Trump's ability to repay his indebtedness is subject to significant business, economic, regulatory and competitive uncertainties, many of which are beyond his control. Any failure by Trump to repay or reschedule his indebtedness or to otherwise maintain financial stability may have a material adverse effect on the Company. Moreover, if the CCC at any time finds Trump to be financially unstable under the Casino Control Act, the CCC is authorized to take any necessary public action to protect the public interest, including the suspension or revocation of the casino licenses of Plaza Associates and/or Taj Associates. Any jurisdiction in which the Company may seek to conduct gaming operations would likely have similar regulations. See "--Strict Regulation by Gaming Authorities" and "Regulatory Matters." Trump has informed the Company that certain of his current or proposed lenders, including an affiliate of Donaldson, Lufkin & Jenrette Securities Corporation ("DLJ"), are expected to refinance certain of his personal indebtedness, which new indebtedness would have covenants and events of default similar in scope to those contained in his existing indebtedness. As security for some or all of the new indebtedness, it is anticipated that Trump will pledge, and cause TTMI to pledge, all of their interests in the Company and THCR Holdings. In the event that Trump is unable to pay such indebtedness when due, subject to applicable regulatory approval, such lenders would have the right to foreclose on the pledged Class B Common Stock and the pledged limited partnership interests in THCR Holdings and cause such limited partnership interests to be converted into shares of Common Stock and to have such shares registered for resale under the Securities Act. Such an event could have an adverse effect on the value of a holder's shares of Common Stock. Trump is currently subject to certain loan agreements which contain covenants that relate to his equity interests in Taj Associates. In connection with 26
424B127th Page of 203TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 27th
the Merger Transaction, Trump is seeking to obtain from his personal creditors, among other things, releases of liens on his direct and indirect equity interests in Taj Associates, which releases are required to consummate the Merger Transaction. Bankers Trust, an affiliate of BT Securities Corporation ("BT Securities") is a significant creditor of Trump and will be receiving a payment of $10 million in connection with the Merger Transaction in order to release certain liens and guarantees. See "Business--Certain Indebtedness--Taj Associates--TTMI Note." Bankers Trust will also receive a pledge of Trump's and TTMI's interests in the Company and THCR Holdings to the extent that the liens of the new indebtedness are released. Both DLJ and BT Securities have rendered financial advisory services to the Company and Taj Holding in the past, acted as co-managers in the June 1995 Offerings and are serving as underwriters of the Offerings. See "Underwriting." Change of Control. The Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company (the "Certificate of Incorporation") and Amended and Restated By- Laws of the Company (the "By-Laws") contain provisions which may have the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing a change in control of the Company. In addition, the Senior Note Indenture contains, and the Mortgage Note Indenture will contain, provisions relating to certain changes of control of THCR Holdings and Trump AC. Upon the occurrence of such a change of control, the respective issuers would be obligated to make an offer to purchase all of the respective Notes then outstanding at a purchase price equal to 101% of the principal amount thereof, plus accrued and unpaid interest to the date of purchase. There can be no assurance that funds necessary to effect such a purchase would be available if such an event were to occur. Because of the control of Trump as described above, the value of the Common Stock may be less than it would otherwise be absent such control. ATLANTIC CITY PROPERTIES EXPANSION Construction and Regulatory Approvals. The Trump Plaza Expansion is expected to be completed in the second quarter of 1996, and the Taj Mahal Expansion, the plans for which are subject to modification, is expected to be completed in phases from the first quarter of 1997 through early 1998. Construction projects, however, such as those contemplated by the Trump Plaza Expansion and the Taj Mahal Expansion, can entail significant development and construction risks including, but not limited to, labor disputes, shortages of material and skilled labor, weather interference, unforeseen engineering problems, environmental problems, geological problems, construction, demolition, excavation, zoning or equipment problems and unanticipated cost increases, any of which could give rise to delays or cost overruns. There can be no assurance that Plaza Associates and Taj Associates will receive the licenses and regulatory approvals necessary to undertake, in the case of the Taj Mahal Expansion, and to complete, in the case of each of the renovation of Trump World's Fair and the Taj Mahal Expansion, their respective expansion plans, or that such approvals will be obtained within the anticipated time frames. The Taj Mahal Expansion will require various licenses and regulatory approvals, including the approval of the CCC. Furthermore, the Casino Control Act requires that the additional guest rooms contemplated by the Taj Mahal Expansion and at Trump Plaza East be put in service within a specified time period after any such casino expansion. If Plaza Associates, with respect to Trump Plaza East, or Taj Associates completed any casino expansion and subsequently did not complete the requisite number of additional guest rooms within the specified time period, such party might have to close all or a portion of the expanded casino in order to comply with regulatory requirements, which could have a material adverse effect on the Company. In addition, in order to operate the additional casino space contemplated by the Taj Mahal Expansion, Taj Associates must obtain, among other regulatory approvals, the approval of the CCC and determinations by the CCC that the Taj Mahal's additional casino space, together with its current casino space, is a "single room" under the Casino Control Act and that the operation of this additional casino space by Taj Associates will not constitute undue economic concentration of Atlantic City casino operations. Taj Associates will file a petition with the CCC seeking such determinations. See "Regulatory Matters-- New Jersey Gaming Regulations--Casino Licensee" and "Regulatory Matters--New Jersey Gaming Regulations--Approved Hotel Facilities" and "Management-- Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation--Certain Related Party Transactions of Trump--Plaza Associates." 27
424B128th Page of 203TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 28th
Trump Plaza East. Plaza Associates has opened the casino and 326 rooms at Trump Plaza East and intends to exercise the Trump Plaza East Purchase Option in connection with the Merger Transaction. If Plaza Associates were unable to finance the purchase price of Trump Plaza East pursuant to the Trump Plaza East Purchase Option and its leasehold interest therein were terminated, any amounts expended with respect to Trump Plaza East, including payments under the Trump Plaza East Purchase Option and the lease pursuant to which Plaza Associates leases Trump Plaza East, and any improvements thereon, would inure to the benefit of the unaffiliated third party that owns Trump Plaza East and not to Plaza Associates and would increase the cost of demolition of any improvements for which Plaza Associates would be liable. As of December 31, 1995, Plaza Associates had capitalized approximately $35.7 million in construction costs related to Trump Plaza East. If the development of Trump Plaza East is not successful, the Company would be required to write off the capitalized construction costs associated with the project. Plaza Associates intends to exercise the Trump Plaza East Purchase Option in connection with the Merger Transaction. See "Management--Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation--Certain Related Party Transactions of Trump--Plaza Associates." In September 1993, Trump (as predecessor in interest to Plaza Associates under the lease for Trump Plaza East) entered into a sublease (the "Time Warner Sublease") with Time Warner pursuant to which Time Warner subleased the entire first floor of retail space at Trump Plaza East for a Warner Brothers Studio Store which opened in July 1994. Rent under the Time Warner Sublease is currently accruing and will not become due and payable to Plaza Associates until the satisfaction of certain conditions designed to protect Time Warner from the termination of the Time Warner Sublease by reason of the termination of Plaza Associates' leasehold estate in Trump Plaza East or the foreclosure of a certain mortgage (which will be extinguished by the exercise of the Trump Plaza East Purchase Option) and until Time Warner's unamortized construction costs are less than accrued rent. No assurances can be made that such conditions will be satisfied. In addition, Time Warner may terminate the Time Warner Sublease at any time after July 1996 in the event that gross sales for the store do not meet certain threshold amounts or if at any time after July 1996 if Plaza Associates fails to operate a first class hotel on Trump Plaza East. No assurances can be made that Trump Plaza East will continually be operated as a first class hotel or that sales for the Warner Brothers Studio Store will exceed the threshold amounts. See "Management--Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation--Certain Related Party Transactions of Trump--Plaza Associates." Trump World's Fair. The ongoing renovation of Trump World's Fair is currently expected to be completed in the second quarter of 1996, although there can be no assurance that the project will be completed by such time. Upon the completion of such renovation, the Company intends to operate Trump World's Fair as a casino hotel. On April 9, 1996, the CCC issued Plaza Associates a separate casino license with respect to Trump World's Fair, which license will become effective upon the issuance by the CCC of an operation certificate for the Trump World's Fair facility. See "Regulatory Matters--New Jersey Gaming Regulations--Casino Licensee" and "Regulatory Matters--New Jersey Gaming Regulations--Approved Hotel Facilities." Although construction at Trump World's Fair has commenced, if the costs of developing, constructing, equipping and opening Trump World's Fair exceed the proceeds allocated from the June 1995 Offerings for such expenditures, Plaza Associates may be forced to rely on alternative methods of financing, which may not be available and which could impair the competitive position of Trump Plaza and reduce Plaza Associates' cash flow. See "--High Leverage and Fixed Charges," "--Holding Company Structure; No Anticipation of Dividends," "--Risk in Refinancing and Repayment of Indebtedness; Need for Additional Financing" and "--Restrictions on Certain Activities." The Taj Mahal. It is expected that the Taj Mahal Expansion, the plans for which are subject to modification, will be principally funded out of cash from the operations of the Atlantic City Properties. The ability to complete such expansion may depend in part on the ability of the Company to obtain debt financing for such purpose. There can be no assurance that the Atlantic City Properties will be able to generate sufficient cash from operations or that financing could be obtained on terms satisfactory to the Company, if at all. In addition, any indebtedness to be incurred in connection with the Taj Mahal Expansion would be subject to the limitations set forth in the Senior Note Indenture and the Mortgage Note Indenture. See "--High Leverage and 28
424B129th Page of 203TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 29th
Fixed Charges," "--Holding Company Structure; No Anticipation of Dividends," "--Risk in Refinancing and Repayment of Indebtedness; Need for Additional Financing," "--Restrictions on Certain Activities" and "Business--Atlantic City Marketing Strategy--The Taj Mahal." THE INDIANA RIVERBOAT New Venture Risk. The Indiana Riverboat is a start-up development. Trump Indiana's operations are subject to all of the many risks inherent in the establishment of a new business enterprise, including unanticipated construction, permitting, licensing or operating problems with the riverboat and land-based, berthing and support facilities, as well as the ability of the Company to market and operate a new venture in a new gaming jurisdiction. Although construction of the vessel and land-based facilities has begun and is scheduled for opening in the second quarter of 1996, there can be no assurance that the Indiana Riverboat will become operational or that such project will be completed on budget or on schedule. Furthermore, construction projects, such as the Indiana Riverboat, entail significant risks. See "--Considerations with Respect to the Acquisition or Development of Additional Gaming Ventures." As with gaming laws and regulations generally, and particularly in light of the limited history of regulated gaming activities in Indiana, the application of Indiana gaming laws and rules promulgated by the IGC regulations may cause uncertainty with respect to the Indiana Riverboat and the restrictions under which Trump Indiana must operate. The Company cannot make any predictions as to the application of such gaming laws and rules by the IGC. While the Company and its management have substantial experience in operating gaming properties in New Jersey, the Company has never been involved in constructing or operating riverboat casinos, and there is no operating history with respect to the Company's proposed operation at Buffington Harbor, Indiana. The Company's future operating results at Buffington Harbor will depend upon the Company's ability to complete and open gaming facilities on schedule and several other factors over which the Company will have little or no control, including, without limitation, general economic conditions, gaming taxes, the availability of ancillary facilities to support gaming visitors, competition, the availability of adequately trained gaming employees and the ability to obtain and maintain the necessary licenses and permits. There can be no assurance that the Company's operations will prove successful or that the Company will be able to generate sufficient revenues from such operations or attain and maintain profitable operations. In addition, the Company is unable to predict whether seasonality will have a material effect on the operations of the Indiana Riverboat. Trump Indiana and The Majestic Star Casino, LLC ("Barden"), an entity beneficially owned by Don H. Barden, a developer based in Detroit without significant gaming experience, are the two holders of certificates of suitability for Buffington Harbor. Trump Indiana and Barden formed BHR and have entered into an agreement (the "BHR Agreement") relating to the joint ownership, development and operation of all common land-based and waterside operations in support of each of Trump Indiana's and Barden's separate riverboat casinos at Buffington Harbor. Trump Indiana and Barden will each be equally responsible for the development and operating expenses of the common land-based facilities at such site and the Company will be dependent on the ability of Barden to pay for its share of all future expenses. There can be no assurance that the Company or Trump Indiana will be able to fund from operations or to finance on terms satisfactory to the Company or Trump Indiana any such required expenditures or, if available, such other indebtedness would be permitted under existing debt instruments of the Company. Furthermore, while Barden has made all required capital contributions to date, there can be no assurance that Barden will be able to fund its portion of such expenses in the future. Additionally, if either Trump Indiana or Barden causes, permits or suffers an event of default under the BHR Agreement to continue for more than 270 days, including the failure to make a capital contribution or to fulfill any other obligation thereunder within 30 days after written notice, the nondefaulting party will have the right to acquire the defaulting party's interest in BHR for a purchase price of $1 million. Environmental Risks. The Indiana Riverboat is located in an area on Lake Michigan known as Buffington Harbor. Buffington Harbor had been the site of industrial operations, which prior operations or activities have or 29
424B130th Page of 203TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 30th
may have resulted in pollution or contamination of the environment. As an owner and operator of the Indiana Riverboat, Trump Indiana and the Company could be held liable under certain legal theories for the costs of cleaning up, as well as certain damages resulting from, past or present spills, disposals or other releases of hazardous or toxic substances or wastes on, in or from the site, regardless of whether either party knew of, or was responsible for, the presence of such substances or wastes at the site. Neither the Company nor Trump Indiana has a source of indemnity for any such liability. However, the Company believes, based on third-party engineering reports, that it has completed all remedial activities expected to be required. Maritime and Weather Considerations. Under the provisions of Title 46 of the United States Code, the design, construction and operation of the Indiana Riverboat are subject to regulation and approval by the U.S. Coast Guard. Prior to the commencement of operations, a Certificate of Inspection and a Certificate of Documentation must be obtained from the U.S. Coast Guard. As a condition of the issuance of a Certificate of Inspection, the U.S. Coast Guard may, among other things, require changes in the design or construction of the Indiana Riverboat that may materially increase the cost of construction and/or materially delay the completion of construction and the commencement of operations. All shipboard employees of Trump Indiana employed on U.S. Coast Guard regulated vessels, including those not involved with the actual operation of the vessel, such as dealers, cocktail hostesses and security personnel, may be subject to certain federal legislation relating to maritime activity, which, among other things, exempts those employees from state limits on workers' compensation awards. The Company expects that it will have adequate insurance to cover employee claims. The Indiana Riverboat is anticipated to be a cruising riverboat, which, among other things, would require a U.S. Coast Guard hull inspection at five- year intervals. Operating at Buffington Harbor will expose the Indiana Riverboat to marine hazards such as unpredictable currents, floods or other severe weather conditions and a heavy volume of maritime traffic. The Company anticipates that adequate maritime insurance coverage will be obtained for the Indiana Riverboat; however, the occurrence of a catastrophic loss in excess of coverage would have a material adverse effect on the Company. Trump Indiana's revenues will be derived from its riverboat and land-based facilities. A riverboat could be lost from service due to casualty, mechanical failure, extended or extraordinary maintenance, or inspection. The loss of a vessel from service for an extended period of time could adversely affect Trump Indiana's operations. Business activity at any location could also be adversely affected by a flood or other severe weather conditions. Flooding in particular, as well as other severe weather conditions, could make the Company's vessel more difficult or impossible to board, or even result in a prolonged or total loss of a gaming vessel, either of which could have a material adverse effect on the Company. Although the Company expects to maintain insurance against casualty losses resulting from severe weather, the insurance coverage maintained may not adequately compensate the Company for losses, including loss of profits, resulting from severe weather. COMPETITION Trump Plaza and the Taj Mahal. Competition in the Atlantic City casino hotel market is intense. The Atlantic City Properties compete with each other and with the other casino hotels located in Atlantic City, including the other casino hotel owned by Trump, Trump's Castle. See "--Conflicts of Interest." The Atlantic City Properties each are located on The Boardwalk, approximately 1.2 miles apart from each other. At present, there are 12 casino hotels located in Atlantic City, including the Atlantic City Properties, all of which compete for patrons. In addition, there are several sites on The Boardwalk and in the Atlantic City Marina area on which casino hotels could be built in the future and various applications for casino licenses have been filed and announcements with respect thereto made from time to time (including a proposal by Mirage Resorts, Inc.), although the Company is not aware of any current construction on such sites by third parties. No new casino hotels have commenced operations in Atlantic City since 1990, although several existing casino hotels have recently expanded or are in the process of expanding their operations. While management believes that the addition of hotel capacity would be beneficial to the Atlantic City market generally, there can be no assurance that such expansion would not be materially disadvantageous to either of the Atlantic City Properties. There also can be no assurance that the Atlantic City development projects which are planned or underway will be completed. 30
424B131st Page of 203TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 31st
Total Atlantic City gaming revenues have increased over the past four years, although at varying rates. Although all 12 Atlantic City casinos reported increases in gaming revenues in 1992 as compared to 1991, the Company believes that this was due, in part, to the depressed industry conditions in 1991. In 1993, nine casinos experienced increased gaming revenues compared to 1992 (including the Taj Mahal), while three casinos (including Trump Plaza) experienced decreased revenues. In 1994, ten casinos experienced increased gaming revenues compared to 1993 (including the Taj Mahal), while two casinos (including Trump Plaza) experienced decreased revenues. During 1995, all 12 casinos experienced increased gaming revenues compared to 1994. In 1990, the Atlantic City casino industry experienced a significant increase in room capacity and in available casino floor space, including the rooms and floor space made available by the opening of the Taj Mahal. The effects of such expansion were to increase competition and to contribute to a decline in 1990 in gaming revenues per square foot of casino floor space. In 1990, the Atlantic City casino industry experienced a decline in gaming revenues per square foot of 5.0%, which trend continued in 1991, although at the reduced rate of 2.9%. In 1992, however, the Atlantic City casino industry experienced an increase of 6.9% in gaming revenues per square foot from 1991. Gaming revenues per square foot increased by 1.4% for 1993 (excluding poker and race simulcast rooms, which were introduced for the first time in such year), compared to 1992. In 1994, gaming revenues per square foot decreased 2.5% (or 4.5% including square footage devoted to poker, keno and race simulcasting). The 1994 decline was due, in part, to the increase in casino floor space in Atlantic City as a result of expansion of a number of casinos and to the severe weather conditions which affected the Northeast during the winter of 1994. Between April 30, 1993 and December 31, 1995, many operators in Atlantic City expanded their facilities in anticipation of and in connection with the June 1993 legalization of simulcasting and poker, increasing total gaming square footage by approximately 181,200 square feet (23.3%) of which approximately 83,700 square feet is currently devoted to poker, keno and race simulcasting. During this same period, 172 poker tables and 5,500 slot machines were added. See "Business--Atlantic City Market." The Atlantic City Properties also compete, or will compete, with facilities in the northeastern and mid- Atlantic regions of the United States at which casino gaming or other forms of wagering are currently, or in the future may be, authorized. To a lesser extent, the Atlantic City Properties face competition from gaming facilities nationwide, including land-based, cruise line, riverboat and dockside casinos located in Colorado, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Nevada, South Dakota, Ontario (Windsor), the Bahamas, Puerto Rico and other locations inside and outside the United States, and from other forms of legalized gaming in New Jersey and in its surrounding states such as lotteries, horse racing (including off-track betting), jai alai, bingo and dog racing, and from illegal wagering of various types. New or expanded operations by other persons can be expected to increase competition and could result in the saturation of certain gaming markets. In September 1995, New York introduced a keno lottery game, which is played on video terminals that have been set up in approximately 1,800 bars, restaurants and bowling alleys across the state. In addition to competing with other casino hotels in Atlantic City and elsewhere, by virtue of their proximity to each other and the common aspects of certain of their respective marketing efforts, including the common use of the "Trump" name, the Atlantic City Properties compete directly with each other and with Trump's Castle for gaming patrons. Although management does not intend to operate Trump Plaza and the Taj Mahal to the competitive detriment of each other, the effect may be that Trump Plaza or the Taj Mahal will operate to the competitive detriment of the other. The Indiana Riverboat. The Company anticipates that the Indiana Riverboat will compete primarily with riverboats and other casinos in the greater Chicago metropolitan area and throughout the Great Lakes Market. Although northern Indiana is part of the greater Chicago metropolitan market, which is one of the most successful new gaming markets in the United States, the Indiana Riverboat may be more dependent on patrons from northern Indiana than its Illinois competitors, and the propensity of these patrons to wager cannot be predicted with any degree of certainty. In addition to competing with Barden's riverboat at the shared Buffington Harbor site, the Indiana Riverboat will compete with a riverboat in Hammond, Indiana which is being developed by the owner and operator of the Empress Riverboat Casino in Joliet, Illinois, a riverboat in East Chicago, Indiana, which is being developed by Showboat, Inc. and with the riverboat expected to be licensed in the nearby community of Michigan City, Indiana. To a lesser degree, the Indiana Riverboat will compete with the six 31
424B132nd Page of 203TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 32nd
additional riverboats expected to be licensed in the rest of Indiana. At present there are four other riverboat casino operations in the Chicago area (three of which operate two riverboats each, with each operator limited to 1,200 gaming positions in the aggregate). In addition, a casino opened during 1994 in Windsor, Ontario, across the river from Detroit, and Detroit is considering several proposals for casinos in its downtown area. Although the Company believes that there is sufficient demand in the market to sustain the Indiana Riverboat, there can be no assurance to that effect. Legislation has also been introduced on numerous occasions in recent years to expand riverboat gaming in Illinois, including by authorizing new sites in the Chicago area with which the Indiana Riverboat would compete. The Company understands that there have been recent discussions in Illinois regarding possible legislation to permit dockside gaming and or increase the gaming position limitations. There can be no assurance that either Indiana or Illinois, or both, will not authorize additional gaming licenses, including for the Chicago metropolitan area. See "--The Indiana Riverboat." The Company believes that competition in the gaming industry, particularly the riverboat and dockside gaming industry, is based principally on the quality and location of gaming facilities, the effectiveness of marketing efforts, and customer service and satisfaction. Although management of the Company believes that the location of the Indiana Riverboat will allow the Company to compete effectively with other casinos in the geographic area surrounding its casino, the Company expects competition in the casino gaming industry to be intense as more casinos are opened and new entrants into the gaming industry become operational. Furthermore, new or expanded operations by other persons can be expected to increase competition for existing and future operations and could result in a saturation of the Great Lakes Market. Other Competition. In addition, the Atlantic City Properties face, and the Indiana Riverboat will face, competition from casino facilities in a number of states operate by federally recognized Native American tribes. Pursuant to the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act ("IGRA"), which was passed by Congress in 1988, any state which permits casino style gaming (even if only for limited charity purposes) is required to negotiate gaming compacts with federally recognized Native American tribes. Under IGRA, Native American tribes enjoy comparative freedom from regulation and taxation of gaming operations, which provides them with an advantage over their competitors, including the Atlantic City Properties and the Indiana Riverboat. In March 1996, the United States Supreme Court struck down a provision of IGRA which allowed Native American tribes to sue states in federal court for failing to negotiate gaming compacts in good faith. The Company cannot predict the impact of this decision on the ability of Native American tribes to negotiate compacts with the states. See "Business--Competition." Legislation permitting other forms of casino gaming has been proposed, from time to time, in various states, including those bordering New Jersey. Plans to begin operating slot machines at race tracks in the State of Delaware are underway, including the slot machines currently operating at the Dover Downs and Delaware Park race tracks. Six states have presently legalized riverboat gambling while others are considering its approval, including New York and Pennsylvania, and New York City is considering a plan under which it would be the embarking point for gambling cruises into international waters three miles offshore. Several states are considering or have approved large scale land- based casinos. Additionally, since 1993, gaming floor space in Las Vegas has expanded significantly, with additional capacity planned and currently under construction. The operations of Trump Plaza and the Taj Mahal could be adversely affected by such competition, particularly if casino gaming were permitted in jurisdictions near or elsewhere in New Jersey or in other states in the Northeast. In December 1993, the Rhode Island Lottery Commission approved the addition of slot machine games on video terminals at Lincoln Greyhound Park and Newport Jai Alai, where poker and blackjack have been offered for over two years. Currently, casino gaming, other than Native American gaming, is not allowed in other areas of New Jersey or in Connecticut, New York or Pennsylvania. On November 17, 1995, a proposal to allow casino gaming in Bridgeport, Connecticut, was voted down by that state's Senate. A New York State Assembly plan has the potential of legalizing non- Native American gaming in portions of upstate New York. Essential to this plan is a proposed New York State constitutional amendment that would legalize gambling. To amend the New York Constitution, the next elected New York State Legislature must repass a proposal legalizing gaming and a statewide referendum, held no sooner than November 1997, must approve the constitutional amendment. To the 32
424B133rd Page of 203TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 33rd
extent that legalized gaming becomes more prevalent in New Jersey or other jurisdictions near Atlantic City, competition would intensify. In particular, in the past, proposals have been introduced to legalize gaming in other locations, including Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. In addition, legislation has from time to time been introduced in the New Jersey State Legislature relating to types of statewide legalized gaming, such as video games with small wagers. To date, no such legislation, which may require a state constitutional amendment, has been enacted. Legislation has also been introduced on numerous occasions in recent years to expand riverboat gaming in Illinois, including by authorizing new sites in the Chicago area with which the Indiana Riverboat would compete and by otherwise modifying existing regulations to decrease or eliminate certain restrictions such as gaming position limitations. To date, no such legislation has been enacted. The Company is unable to predict whether any such legislation, in New Jersey, Indiana, Illinois or elsewhere, will be enacted or whether, if passed, it would have a material adverse impact on the Company. RELIANCE ON KEY PERSONNEL The ability of the Company and Taj Associates to operate successfully is dependent, in part, upon the continued services of certain of its employees, including Nicholas L. Ribis, the President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, the Chief Executive Officer of THCR Holdings and the Chief Executive Officer of Taj Associates. Mr. Ribis' employment agreements with the Company and THCR Holdings on the one hand and Taj Associates on the other will expire on June 7, 2000 and September 25, 1996, respectively (subject to earlier termination upon the occurrence of certain events). There can be no assurance that a suitable replacement for Mr. Ribis could be found in the event of a termination of his employment. A shortage of skilled management-level employees currently exists in the gaming industry which may make it difficult and expensive to attract and retain qualified employees. In addition, Mr. Ribis and certain other executives of the Company and Taj Associates currently allocate their time among the Company's and Taj Associates' various operations as well as certain other enterprises owned by Trump. Following the consummation of the Merger Transaction, Mr. Ribis will devote approximately 75% of his professional time to the affairs of the Company and its subsidiaries. See "Management." STRICT REGULATION BY GAMING AUTHORITIES General. Any jurisdiction in which the Company may seek to conduct gaming operations would likely require the Company to apply for and obtain licenses and regulatory approvals with respect to the construction, design and operational features of the gaming facilities it intends to operate in that jurisdiction. The obtaining of such licenses and approvals may be time consuming and expensive and cannot be assured. The Company believes that the availability of significant additional revenue through taxation is one of the primary reasons that Indiana and other jurisdictions have legalized gaming. The Company's current gaming operations are, and any future gaming operations are likely to be, subject to significant taxes and fees in addition to normal federal and state corporate income taxes, and such taxes and fees are subject to increase at any time. Any material increase in these taxes or fees would adversely affect the Company. Trump Plaza and the Taj Mahal. The ownership and operation of the gaming related businesses of Plaza Associates and Taj Associates are subject to strict state regulation under the Casino Control Act. Plaza Associates and Taj Associates and their various officers and other qualifiers have received the licenses, permits and authorizations required to operate Trump Plaza and the Taj Mahal, respectively. Failure to maintain or obtain the requisite casino licenses would have a material adverse effect on the Company. On June 22, 1995, the CCC renewed Taj Associates' casino license through March 31, 1999 and renewed Plaza Associates' casino license through June 30, 1999, subject to revocation or suspension upon the occurrence of certain events. No assurance can be given as to the term for which the CCC will renew these licenses or as to what license conditions, if any, may be imposed by the CCC in connection with any future renewals. The Merger Transaction (including the issuance of $1.1 billion of Mortgage Notes) was approved by the CCC on April 9, 1996. On April 11, 1996, the CCC approved the issuance of an additional $100 million of Mortgage Notes to be included in the Mortgage Note Offering. See "Regulatory Matters--New Jersey Gaming Regulations." The Casino Control Act imposes substantial restrictions on the ownership of securities of the Company. A shareholder may be required to meet the qualification provisions of the Casino Control Act relating to financial 33
424B134th Page of 203TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 34th
sources and/or security holders. Each institutional investor (as defined in the Casino Control Act) seeking a waiver of qualification must execute a certification that it has no intention of influencing or affecting the affairs of the issuer, the casino licensee or its holding or intermediary companies (except for voting at shareholder meetings), which certification will be provided to the New Jersey Division of Gaming Enforcement and the CCC. Pursuant to the provisions of the Casino Control Act, the Certificate of Incorporation provides that all securities of the Company are held subject to the condition that, if a holder thereof is found to be disqualified by the CCC pursuant to the provisions of the Casino Control Act, such holder shall (a) dispose of his interest in the Company; (b) not receive any dividends or interest upon any such securities; (c) not exercise, directly or through any trustee or nominee, any right conferred by such securities; and (d) not receive any remuneration in any form from the casino licensee for services rendered or otherwise. See "Regulatory Matters--New Jersey Gaming Regulations." The Indiana Riverboat. In January 1996, the IGC extended Trump Indiana's certificate of suitability constituting approval of the application for a riverboat owner's license for a riverboat to be docked at Buffington Harbor, on Lake Michigan in Indiana. The certificate of suitability is valid until June 28, 1996, and may be further extended upon written application to and approval of the IGC. A riverboat owner's license will only be issued upon substantial satisfaction of the conditions of the certificate of suitability and the requirements of the gaming laws, which include completion of the Indiana Riverboat's vessel, acquisition of necessary permits or approvals from federal, state and local authorities, execution of a "Development Agreement" with the City of Gary (which is currently being negotiated) and readiness to commence operations. See "Business--Indiana Riverboat." Pursuant to the terms of the certificate of suitability, Trump Indiana must comply with certain other requirements imposed by the IGC, including a requirement that Trump Indiana invest an aggregate of $153 million in the Indiana Riverboat and certain related projects and certain economic development projects and pay certain incentive fees based on percentages of gaming revenues and earnings to the City of Gary, Indiana. Failure to comply with the foregoing conditions and/or failure to commence riverboat excursions as may be required by the IGC may result in the expiration of the certificate of suitability. There can be no assurance that the Company and/or Trump Indiana will be able to comply with the terms of the certificate of suitability, that it will be further extended if operations do not commence by June 28, 1996 or that a riverboat owner's license for the Indiana Riverboat will ultimately be granted. Further, the IGC may place restrictions, conditions or requirements on the permanent riverboat owner's license. If granted, such license would be for an initial term of five years and renewable annually thereafter, subject to revocation or suspension. With respect to certain land-based, berthing and support facilities as currently planned, Trump Indiana is also dependent on the ability of Barden to obtain the requisite licenses and fund its portion of joint development and operating costs under the BHR Agreement. In October 1994, the U.S. Attorney General's Office in Indiana notified the IGC that a federal law passed in 1951, commonly known as the Johnson Act, prohibits gaming vessels from cruising within federal maritime jurisdiction and prohibits gaming on such vessels. The Department of Justice has expressed concern that the Johnson Act may prohibit gaming on vessels on the Great Lakes because it has contended that the Great Lakes are within federal maritime jurisdiction. The Department of Justice is still considering the issue, however, and has not reached a definitive conclusion. Currently, Congress has legislation pending that contains a related amendment to the Johnson Act. The Coast Guard Authorization bill, which contains a provision that would amend the Johnson Act specifically to allow gaming on vessels in the Indiana waters of Lake Michigan, was passed by the House of Representatives. The Senate- passed version of the Coast Guard Authorization bill does not contain a similar provision. Because the House of Representatives and the Senate passed different versions of the Coast Guard Authorization bill, a conference committee composed of House and Senate members is expected to be formed later in the Second Session of the 104th Congress (1996) to resolve differences in these versions. In 1995, the Indiana General Assembly adopted two differing amendments to the Riverboat Gambling Act permitting gambling to be conducted while a riverboat is docked under certain conditions. One of the amendments included an express provision allowing gambling to be conducted while a riverboat is docked if a determination is made that a condition exists that would cause a violation of federal law if the riverboat were to cruise. The other amendment did not include that express provision. The IGC has determined that the two amendments can be harmonized in a way that would permit gambling while a riverboat is docked if cruising would be a violation of federal law. Notwithstanding the IGC's determination, there can be no assurance that 34
424B135th Page of 203TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 35th
commencement of gaming operations by Trump Indiana while the riverboat is cruising would not be challenged as a violation of the Johnson Act or that commencement of gaming operations while the riverboat is docked would not be challenged as a violation of the Johnson Act or Indiana law. See "Regulatory Matters--Indiana Gaming Regulations--Excursions." Pursuant to IGC proposed rules, any person acquiring 5% or more of Common Stock (or for certain institutional investors, 15%) must be found suitable by the IGC. The IGC has the authority to require a finding of suitability with respect to any stockholder regardless of the percentage of ownership. In this regard, the Certificate of Incorporation provides that the Company may redeem any shares of the Company's capital stock held by any person or entity whose holding of shares may cause the loss or non-reinstatement of a governmental license held by the Company. Such redemption shall be at the lesser of the price at which the stock was purchased or the market price (as defined in the Certificate of Incorporation). See "Regulatory Matters--Indiana Gaming Regulations--Indiana Gaming Commission." CONSIDERATIONS WITH RESPECT TO THE ACQUISITION OR DEVELOPMENT OF ADDITIONAL GAMING VENTURES The Company's growth strategy includes the selective acquisition, development, ownership and/or management of dockside, riverboat and/or land- based casinos in emerging and established gaming jurisdictions. The Company's plans for development and acquisition of gaming ventures in addition to Trump Plaza, the Indiana Riverboat and the Taj Mahal are speculative at this time, as the Company has no present plans to acquire or develop any other specific gaming venture. The availability of new gaming opportunities is largely dependent on the legality of gaming in various states, and gaming is currently prohibited throughout most of the United States. Moreover, the recent expansion of the legalization of gaming may not continue and furthermore, the potential exists for the repeal of gaming in certain jurisdictions where it is currently permitted. Legislation relating to gaming has been introduced and failed to pass in the legislatures in a number of states including Connecticut and Florida, and furthermore, the potential exists for the repeal of gaming in certain jurisdictions where it is currently permitted. For these and other reasons, no assurance can be given that attractive opportunities to develop new operations will be available to the Company or that the Company will be able to take advantage of any opportunity that does arise. To engage in multiple projects or larger scale development activities, the Company will need to obtain financing from third parties and may require additional managerial resources. There can be no assurance that additional financing or managerial talent will be available or, if available, that it would be on terms satisfactory to the Company. Incurrence of such indebtedness would also be subject to restrictions under debt instruments of the Company. See "--High Leverage and Fixed Charges" and "--Restrictions on Certain Activities." In addition, the Company would need to obtain additional sites and licenses to operate such gaming facilities and competition for suitable sites and for licenses is usually intense. No assurance can be given that the Company will be able to obtain desirable sites or necessary licenses or successfully overcome the regulatory, financial, business and other problems inherent in the construction and operation of any new gaming venture. Construction projects, such as those proposed in connection with the development of new gaming ventures, including those currently proposed by Plaza Associates, Trump Indiana and Taj Associates, entail significant risks, including shortages of materials or skilled labor, unforeseen engineering, environmental or geological problems, work stoppages, weather interference, floods, unanticipated cost increases, the inability to commence operations as scheduled and other problems. The number and scope of the licenses and approvals required to complete the construction of any project, such as a hotel and other destination resort facilities, are extensive, including, without limitation, the approval of state and local land-use authorities and the acquisition of building and zoning permits. Unexpected concessions required by local, state or federal regulatory authorities could involve significant additional costs and delay scheduled openings of facilities. There can be no assurance that the Company will receive the licenses and approvals necessary to undertake or complete any of its development plans, or that such licenses and approvals will be obtained within the anticipated time frame. LIMITATIONS ON LICENSE OF THE TRUMP NAME Subject to certain restrictions, the Company has the exclusive right (except with respect to the Taj Mahal (during the period prior to the consummation of the Merger Transaction) and Trump's Castle) to use the 35
424B136th Page of 203TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 36th
"Trump" name and likeness in connection with gaming and related activities pursuant to a trademark license agreement between Trump and the Company (the "License Agreement"). See "Business--Trademark/Licensing." The Company's rights under the License Agreement are secured by a security interest in the names "Trump," "Donald Trump" and "Donald J. Trump" (including variations thereon, the "Trump Names") and related intellectual property rights (collectively, the "Marks") for use in connection with casino services, pursuant to a security agreement (the "Trademark Security Agreement"). If there were a default under the License Agreement or the Trademark Security Agreement, the Company would have rights, subject to the requirements of applicable state law, to enforce the rights and remedies contained in the Trademark Security Agreement. In the event of a foreclosure sale of the Marks, the net amount realized in such sale by the Company might not yield the full amount of damages that the Company could sustain as a result of the default. In addition, the existence of rights of others to the use of the Trump Names, including pursuant to the existing security interests with respect to trademarks associated with Trump's Castle as well as to any other security interests in trademarks for non-gaming hotels, could adversely affect the ability of the Company to realize the benefits of the Trademark Security Agreement. The Company's right to repossess and dispose of the Marks upon a breach of the License Agreement may be significantly impaired if the owner of the Marks were to become the subject of a case under the United States Bankruptcy Code (the "Bankruptcy Code") prior to the Company's having repossessed and disposed of the Marks. Under the Bankruptcy Code, secured creditors, such as the Company, are automatically stayed from repossessing or disposing of their collateral without bankruptcy court approval. Moreover, the Bankruptcy Code permits a defaulting debtor to retain and continue to use the collateral if the secured creditor is given "adequate protection" of its interest in the collateral. Such adequate protection under the Bankruptcy Code may take various forms, including the granting of a replacement lien or other relief that will enable the secured creditor to realize the "indubitable equivalent" of its interest in the collateral. Accordingly, it is impossible to predict whether or when the Company would repossess or dispose of the Marks, or whether or to what extent the Company would then be compensated for any delay in payment or loss of value of the Marks through the requirement of "adequate protection" if the owner of the Marks were to become the subject of a bankruptcy or reorganization case. Furthermore, the License Agreement could be rejected in connection with a bankruptcy of the licensor if, in the business judgment of a trustee or the licensor, as debtor-in-possession, rejection of the contract would benefit the licensor's estate. In the event of such rejection, the Company could assert a claim for damages, secured by the Company's lien on the Marks. FRAUDULENT TRANSFER CONSIDERATIONS The obligations of Trump AC under the Mortgage Notes, which will be issued as part of the Merger Transaction, may be subject to review under state or federal fraudulent transfer laws in the event of the bankruptcy or other financial difficulty of Trump AC. Under those laws, if a court in a lawsuit by an unpaid creditor or representative of creditors of Trump AC, such as a trustee in bankruptcy, or Trump AC as debtor in possession, were to find that at the time Trump AC incurred its obligations under the Mortgage Notes, it (a) did so with actual intent to hinder, delay or defraud its creditors, or (b) did not receive reasonably equivalent value or fair consideration therefor, and either (i) was insolvent, (ii) was rendered insolvent, (iii) was engaged in a business or transaction for which its remaining unencumbered assets constituted unreasonably small capital, or (iv) intended to incur or believed that it would incur debts beyond its ability to pay as such debts matured, such court could avoid Trump AC's obligations under the Mortgage Notes and direct the return of any amounts paid thereunder to Trump AC or to a fund for the benefit of its creditors. Similarly, the obligations of Taj Associates, Plaza Associates or any other guarantor (each, a "Guarantor") under its guarantee of the Mortgage Notes, as well as the security interest granted by such Guarantor in its assets to secure the Mortgage Notes and such guarantee, may be subject to review under such laws in the event of the bankruptcy or other financial difficulty of such Guarantor. In that event, if a court were to find that at the time such Guarantor incurred such obligations or granted such security interest the factors set forth in either clause (a) or (b) in the foregoing paragraph applied to such Guarantor, such court could avoid such Guarantor's obligations under its guarantee, as well as the security interests securing such guarantee, and direct the return of any amounts paid under such guarantee to such Guarantor or to a fund for the benefit of its creditors. 36
424B137th Page of 203TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 37th
Among other things, a court might conclude that a Guarantor did not receive reasonably equivalent value or fair consideration for its guarantee to the extent that the economic benefits realized by it in the Merger Transaction (including the payment of its outstanding obligations) were less than the aggregate amount of its liability under its guarantee. In the event a fraudulent transfer were found to have occurred under the circumstances described above, an unpaid creditor or representative of creditors of Trump AC, such as a trustee in bankruptcy, or Trump AC as debtor in possession, would not have recourse against stockholders of the Company. If a court were to conclude that Trump AC received less than reasonably equivalent value from selling stockholders of Taj Holding, and, as a consequence thereof, Trump AC: (i) was insolvent, (ii) was rendered insolvent, (iii) was engaged in a business or transaction for which its remaining unencumbered assets constituted unreasonably small capital, or (iv) intended to incur or believed that it would incur debts beyond its ability to pay as such debts matured, Trump AC, as debtor in possession, or another representative of its estate (such as a bankruptcy trustee) could, among other things, seek to recover the amounts paid to such selling stockholders to the extent such amounts exceed the fair market value of the assets transferred. The measure of insolvency for purposes of the foregoing will vary depending on the law of the jurisdiction being applied. Generally, however, an entity would be considered insolvent if the sum of its debts (including contingent or unliquidated debts) is greater than all of its property at a fair valuation or if the present fair salable value of its assets is less than the amount that would be required to pay its probable liability on its existing debts as they become absolute and matured. SHARES ELIGIBLE FOR FUTURE SALE Immediately following completion of the Merger Transaction, there will be approximately 23,377,718 shares of Common Stock outstanding (25,252,718 shares if the Underwriters' over-allotment option is exercised in full), excluding (i) 8,072,307 shares of Common Stock (subject to certain adjustment) issuable upon conversion of Trump's and TTMI's limited partnership interest in THCR Holdings, (ii) the 66,666 shares of Common Stock underlying phantom stock units issued to the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, (iii) 133,333 shares of Common Stock issuable upon exercise of options granted to the Chief Executive Officer of the Company pursuant to the 1995 Stock Plan, (iv) an additional 733,334 shares of Common Stock reserved for issuance pursuant to the 1995 Stock Plan, (v) 1.8 million shares of Common Stock reserved for issuance in connection with the warrant to be issued to Trump and (vi) the Class B Common Stock, which shares are not entitled to dividends or distributions and represent Trump's and TTMI's respective voting interest and become nonvoting to the extent of a conversion of Trump's and TTMI's respective interest in THCR Holdings. In the event that shares of Common Stock are issued in the Merger, the Company may reduce the size of the Stock Offering. Of the shares of Common Stock to be outstanding following the consummation of the Merger Transaction, the shares to be sold in the Stock Offering and to be issued to First Fidelity (425,000 of the 500,000 shares of which will be subject to an agreement not to sell or otherwise dispose for 30 days without the prior written consent of DLJ), as well as the shares of Common Stock issued in the June 1995 Stock Offering, will be freely tradeable without restriction (subject to any applicable lock-up) or future registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities Act"), unless acquired by an "affiliate" (as defined in the Securities Act) of the Company, which shares will be subject to resale limitations of Rule 144 promulgated under the Securities Act ("Rule 144"). The remaining 66,667 shares outstanding upon completion of the Stock Offering will not have been registered under the Securities Act and are restricted securities within the meaning of Rule 144 ("Restricted Shares"), except that such shares, the shares of Common Stock issuable upon conversion of Trump's and TTMI's limited partnership interest in THCR Holdings and the shares issuable under the warrant to be issued to Trump have or will have certain registration rights. See "Description of the THCR Holdings Partnership Agreement--Exchange and Registration Rights." Restricted Shares cannot be sold publicly in the absence of such registration, unless sold pursuant to an exemption under the Securities Act, such as the exemption provided by Rule 144. The Company, certain stockholders and the directors and executive officers of the Company will agree not to issue, sell or otherwise dispose of shares of or securities convertible into or 37
424B138th Page of 203TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 38th
exercisable or exchangeable for Common Stock for a period of 180 days after the date of this Prospectus without the prior written consent of DLJ. Upon expiration of the applicable lock-up period, the shares covered thereby will be eligible for sale subject to the restrictions contained in the Securities Act and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder, including Rule 144. Sales of substantial amounts of Common Stock in the public market subsequent to the Stock Offering, or the perception that such sales could occur, could adversely affect the prevailing market price of the Common Stock and could impair the Company's ability to raise capital through the sale of equity securities. See "Shares Eligible for Future Sale." TRADING MARKETS; POTENTIAL VOLATILITY OF MARKET PRICE The Common Stock began trading in June 1995, and since that time its price has fluctuated substantially. The price at which the Common Stock will trade in the future will depend upon a number of factors, including, without limitation, the Company's historical and anticipated operating results (including the timing of the openings related to the various expansion projects), overall Atlantic City gaming results and general market and economic conditions, several of which factors are beyond the control of the Company. In addition, factors such as quarterly fluctuations in the Company's financial and operating results, announcements by the Company or others, and developments affecting the Company, its customers, the Atlantic City or Great Lakes markets or the gaming industry generally, could cause the market price of the Common Stock to fluctuate substantially. See "Price Range of Common Stock." 38
424B139th Page of 203TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 39th
USE OF PROCEEDS The net proceeds to the Company from the Stock Offering, after payment of underwriting discounts, are estimated to be $369.3 million ($424.7 million if the Underwriters' over-allotment option is exercised in full). In connection with the Merger Transaction, the proceeds from the Stock Offering, together with the proceeds from the Mortgage Note Offering, will be used as set forth below. The following table sets forth the anticipated sources and uses of funds for the Merger Transaction (assuming an April 15, 1996 consummation): (DOLLARS IN MILLIONS) ANTICIPATED SOURCES OF FUNDS [Download Table] CASH SOURCES Stock Offering........... $ 390.6 Mortgage Note Offering... 1,200.0 -------- Total Cash Sources...... 1,590.6 -------- ANTICIPATED USES OF FUNDS [Download Table] CASH USES Redeem Taj Bonds(a)........... $ 794.4 Retire Plaza Notes............ 370.0 Satisfy NatWest Loan.......... 36.5 Exercise Trump Plaza East Purchase Option.............. 28.0 Financing Fees and Expenses... 57.3 Payment to First Fidelity..... 50.0 Payment to Bankers Trust...... 10.0 Acquisition of Taj Holding Class A Common Stock......... 31.5 Redeem Taj Holding Class B Common Stock................. 0.4 Transaction Fees and Expenses..................... 30.0 Working Capital/General Corporate Purposes........... 182.5 -------- Total Cash Uses.............. 1,590.6 -------- [Download Table] NON-CASH SOURCES Common Stock Equivalents to be issued to Trump(b).. 40.5 Common Stock to be issued to Holders of Taj Holding Class A Common Stock................... 9.0 Common Stock to be issued to First Fidelity................. 15.6 -------- Total Non-Cash Sources......... 65.1 -------- TOTAL SOURCES................... $1,655.7 ======== [Download Table] NON-CASH USES Acquisition of Trump's direct and indirect equity interests in Taj Associates............. 40.5 Common Stock issued to Holders of Taj Holding Class A Common Stock......................... 9.0 Common Stock issued to First Fidelity...................... 15.6 -------- Total Non-Cash Uses........... 65.1 -------- TOTAL USES..................... $1,655.7 ======== --------------------- (a) Includes the Additional Amount (as defined) through April 15, 1996. See "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations." (b) Represents the value of the shares of Common Stock into which the limited partnership interests in THCR Holdings to be issued to Trump and TTMI, a corporation wholly owned by Trump, in connection with the Merger Transaction will be convertible. 39
424B140th Page of 203TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 40th
PRICE RANGE OF COMMON STOCK The Common Stock is listed on the NYSE under the symbol "DJT." The initial public offering price of the Common Stock was $14.00 per share. The following table reflects the high and low sales prices of the Common Stock as reported by the NYSE. [Download Table] HIGH LOW ------- ------- 1995 ---- First quarter............................................... N/A N/A Second quarter (from June 7, 1995).......................... $14 1/4 $11 3/8 Third quarter............................................... $19 3/4 $13 Fourth quarter.............................................. $21 5/8 $14 1996 ---- First quarter............................................... $29 1/4 $18 3/4 Second quarter (through April 11, 1996)..................... $35 1/8 $29 On April 11, 1996, the last sales price of the Common Stock reported on the NYSE was $31 1/4. As of April 5, 1996, there were approximately 230 holders of record of Common Stock. Trump is the sole beneficial owner of all 1,000 outstanding shares of Class B Common Stock. No established trading market exists for the Class B Common Stock, and no shares of Class B Common Stock have been transferred since their issuance to Trump. Following the Merger Transaction, Trump and TTMI will each own Class B Common Stock; because Trump wholly owns TTMI, Trump will remain the sole beneficial owner of all outstanding shares of Class B Common Stock. DIVIDEND POLICY The Company has never paid a dividend on the Common Stock and does not anticipate paying one in the foreseeable future. The payment of any future dividends will be at the discretion of the Board of Directors and will depend upon, among other things, the Company's financial condition and capital needs, legal restrictions on the payment of dividends, contractual restrictions in financing agreements and other factors deemed pertinent by the Board of Directors. See "Risk Factors--Restrictions on Certain Activities." It is the current policy of the Board of Directors to retain earnings, if any, for use in the Company's subsidiaries' operations (except as set forth in the THCR Holdings Partnership Agreement), and the Company otherwise has no current intention of paying dividends to the holders of Common Stock. In addition, the Senior Note Indenture contains, and the Mortgage Note Indenture will contain, certain covenants, including, without limitation, covenants with respect to limitations on the payment of dividends, which limitations would limit the Company's ability to obtain funds from THCR Holdings and Trump AC, respectively, with which to pay dividends. Pursuant to these indentures there are restrictions on the payment of dividends unless, among other things, (i) no default or event of default has occurred and is continuing under the indentures subject to certain exceptions, (ii) certain entities meet certain consolidated financial ratios and (iii) the total amount of the dividends does not exceed certain amounts specified in the indentures. See "Business--Certain Indebtedness" and "Description of the THCR Holdings Partnership Agreement." The Class B Common Stock has no right to receive any dividend or other distribution from the Company. 40
424B141st Page of 203TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 41st
CAPITALIZATION The following table sets forth the capitalization as of December 31, 1995 of Taj Associates, the Company, Taj Associates and the Company on a combined basis and the Company as adjusted to give effect to the Merger Transaction. This table should be read in conjunction with the Company's consolidated financial statements and notes thereto and Unaudited Pro Forma Financial Information included elsewhere in this Prospectus. [Download Table] AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1995 ---------------------------------------------------- ACTUAL --------------------- TAJ THE ASSOCIATES COMPANY COMBINED PRO FORMA ---------- -------- ---------- ---------- (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) Cash: Total cash............. $ 88,941 $ 19,208 $ 108,149 $ 282,944 ======== ======== ========== ========== Debt (including current maturities): Total debt............. $826,215(a) $500,720(b) $1,326,935(a)(b) $1,371,749 -------- -------- ---------- ---------- Minority Interest........ -- -- -- 30,500 -------- -------- ---------- ---------- Stockholders' Equity: Common Stock, $.01 par value, 50,000,000 shares authorized, 10,066,667 shares issued and outstanding (23,377,718 shares(c) on a pro forma basis)................ -- 101 101 234 Class B Common Stock, $.01 par value, 1,000 shares authorized, issued and outstanding........... -- -- -- -- Preferred Stock, $1.00 par value, 1,000,000 shares authorized, none were issued and outstanding........... -- -- -- -- Contributed Capital/Additional Paid-in Capital....... 123,765 52,411 176,176 430,776 Accumulated deficit.... (84,130) (1,921) (86,051) (56,035) -------- -------- ---------- ---------- Total Capital/Total Stockholders' Equity.............. 39,635 50,591 90,226 374,975 -------- -------- ---------- ---------- Total Capitaliza- tion.............. $865,850 $551,311 $1,417,161 $1,777,224 ======== ======== ========== ========== --------------------- (a) Does not include unamortized discount of $131,103. (b) Does not include unamortized discount of $3,348. (c) Does not include (i) 6,680,723 shares of Common Stock (subject to certain adjustments) issuable to Trump upon conversion of his limited partnership interest in THCR Holdings; (ii) 1,391,584 shares of Common Stock (subject to certain adjustments) issuable to TTMI, a corporation wholly owned by Trump, upon conversion of its limited partnership interests in THCR Holdings; (iii) 133,333 shares of Common Stock issuable upon exercise of options granted to the Chief Executive Officer of the Company pursuant to the 1995 Stock Plan; (iv) a phantom stock unit award (representing the right to receive 66,666 shares of Common Stock on June 12, 1997) granted to the Chief Executive Officer of the Company pursuant to the 1995 Stock Plan; (v) 733,334 additional shares reserved for issuance pursuant to the 1995 Stock Plan; (vi) 1,800,000 shares of Common Stock underlying the warrant to be issued to Trump in connection with the Merger Transaction (a) 600,000 shares of which may be purchased on or before the third anniversary of the issuance of the warrant at $30.00 per share, (b) 600,000 shares of which may be purchased on or before the fourth anniversary of the issuance of the warrant at $35.00 per share, and (c) 600,000 shares of which may be purchased on or before the fifth anniversary of the issuance of the warrant at $40.00 per share; or (vii) any shares of Common Stock which may be issued in the Merger. Also excludes shares of Class B Stock of the Company held and to be held by Trump and TTMI which represent non-economic voting interest in the Company. Includes an estimation of the number of fractional shares of Common Stock to be issued in the Merger. 41
424B142nd Page of 203TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 42nd
SELECTED HISTORICAL CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL INFORMATION THE COMPANY The following table sets forth certain historical consolidated financial information of Plaza Associates and Trump AC (predecessors of the Company) for each of the years ended December 31, 1991 through 1994 and for the period January 1, 1995 through June 12, 1995 and certain historical consolidated financial information of the Company for the period from inception (June 12, 1995) to December 31, 1995 (See Note 1 below). The historical financial information of Trump AC and Plaza Associates as of December 31, 1994 and June 12, 1995 and for the years ended December 31, 1993 and 1994 for the period January 1, 1995 through June 12, 1995 as set forth below has been derived from the audited consolidated financial statements of Trump AC and Plaza Associates included elsewhere in this Prospectus. The historical financial information of Trump AC and Plaza Associates as of December 31, 1991, 1992 and 1993 and for the years ended December 31, 1991 and 1992 as set forth below has been derived from the audited consolidated financial statements of Trump AC and Plaza Associates not included in this Prospectus. The historical financial information of the Company as of December 31, 1995 and for the period from inception (June 12, 1995) through December 31, 1995 as set forth below has been derived from the audited consolidated financial statements of the Company included elsewhere in this Prospectus. All financial information should be read in conjunction with "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations," "Unaudited Pro Forma Financial Information" and the consolidated and condensed financial statements and the related notes thereto included elsewhere in this Prospectus. [Enlarge/Download Table] TRUMP AC AND PLAZA ASSOCIATES THE COMPANY FROM INCEPTION (JUNE 12, 1995) TO FROM DECEMBER 31, 1995 YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, JANUARY 1, 1995 (NOTE 1) -------------------------------------- THROUGH ----------------- 1991 1992 1993 1994 JUNE 12, 1995 1995 -------- -------- -------- -------- --------------- ----------------- (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS DATA: Revenues: Gaming................. $233,265 $265,448 $264,081 $261,451 $122,865 $175,208 Other.................. 66,411 73,270 69,203 66,869 29,523 44,659 Trump World's Fair (formerly Trump Regency Hotel)........ 11,547 9,465 -- -- -- -- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- Gross revenues......... 311,223 348,183 333,284 328,320 152,388 219,867 Promotional allowances............ 31,539 34,865 32,793 33,257 14,540 24,394 -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- Net revenues........... 279,684 313,318 300,491 295,063 137,848 195,473 -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- Costs and expenses: Gaming................. 133,547 146,328 136,895 139,540 69,467 95,533 Other.................. 23,404 23,670 24,778 23,380 9,483 14,449 General and administrative........ 69,631 75,459 71,624 73,075 30,081 42,826 Depreciation and amortization.......... 16,193 15,842 17,554 15,653 6,999 9,219 Restructuring charges.. 943 5,177 -- -- -- -- Trump World's Fair (formerly Trump Regency Hotel)........ 19,879 11,839 -- -- -- -- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- Total costs and expenses.............. 263,597 278,315 250,851 251,648 116,030 162,027 -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- Income from operations.. 16,087 35,003 49,640 43,415 21,818 33,446 Interest expense, net... 33,363 31,356 39,889 48,219 22,113 31,273 Other non-operating expense(a)............. 14,818 1,462 3,873 4,931 1,649 4,094 Extraordinary (loss) gain(b)................ -- (38,205) 4,120 -- (9,250) -- Provision (benefit) for income taxes........... (2,864) (233) 660 (865) (161) -- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- Net income (loss)....... $(29,230) $(35,787) $ 9,338 $ (8,870) $(11,033) $ (1,921) ======== ======== ======== ======== ======== ======== Net (loss) per common share(c)............... $(.19) ===== BALANCE SHEET DATA (AT END OF PERIOD): Cash and cash equivalents............ $ 10,474 $ 18,802 $ 14,393 $ 11,144 $ 28,125 $ 19,208 Property and equipment, net.................... 306,834 300,266 293,141 298,354 301,316 408,231 Total assets............ 378,398 370,349 374,498 375,643 394,085 584,545 Total long-term debt, net of current maturities(d).......... 33,326 249,723 395,948 403,214 331,142 494,471 Preferred partnership interest............... -- 58,092 -- -- -- -- Total capital (deficit).............. 54,043 11,362 (54,710) (63,580) (74,613) 50,591 ------------------ Note 1: The Company was incorporated on March 28, 1995 and conducted no operations until the June 1995 Stock Offering and contributed the proceeds therefrom to THCR Holdings in exchange for an approximately 60% general partnership interest in THCR Holdings. At the consummation of the June 1995 Stock Offering, Trump contributed his 100% beneficial interest in Plaza Funding. Trump AC and Plaza Associates, the owner and operator of Trump Plaza, to THCR Holdings for an approximate 40% limited partnership interest in THCR Holdings. In addition, Trump contributed to THCR Holdings all of his existing interests and rights to new gaming activities in both emerging and established gaming jurisdictions, including Trump Indiana. The financial data as of December 31, 1995 and for the period ended December 31, 1995 reflect the operations of the Company from inception (June 12, 1995) to December 31, 1995. (footnotes on following page) 42
424B143rd Page of 203TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 43rd
(a) Other non-operating expense for the year ended December 31, 1991 includes a $10.9 million charge associated with the rejection of the lease associated with the former Trump Regency Hotel and $4.0 million of costs associated with certain litigation. Other non-operating expense for 1992 includes $1.5 million of costs associated with certain litigation. Other non-operating expense for the years ended December 31, 1993, 1994, for the period January 1, 1995 through June 12, 1995 and for the period June 12, 1995 through December 31, 1995 includes $3.9, $4.9, $1.6 and $2.1 million, respectively, of real estate taxes and leasing costs associated with Trump Plaza East. (b) The extraordinary loss for the year ended December 31, 1992 consists of the effect of stating Plaza Funding's Preferred Stock issued at fair value as compared to the carrying value of these securities and the write off of certain deferred financing charges and costs. The excess of the carrying value of a note obligation over the amount of the settlement payment net of related prepaid expenses in the amount of $4,120,000 has been reported as an extraordinary gain for the year ended December 31, 1993. The extraordinary loss of $9,250,000 for the period from January 1, 1995 through June 12, 1995 relates to the redemption of the PIK Notes and PIK Note Warrants and the write off of related unamortized deferred financing costs. (c) Earnings per share is based upon weighted average shares outstanding, shares and phantom stock units awarded to the Chief Executive Officer of the Company under the 1995 Stock Plan and common stock equivalent. The shares of Class B Common Stock owned by Trump have no economic interest and, therefore, are not considered. (d) Reflects reclassification in 1991 of indebtedness relating to outstanding mortgage bonds as a current liability due to then existing events of default. 43
424B144th Page of 203TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 44th
TAJ ASSOCIATES The following table sets forth certain historical consolidated financial information of Taj Associates for each of the five years ended December 31, 1991 through 1995. The historical financial information of Taj Associates as of December 31, 1993, 1994 and 1995, and for the years ended December 31, 1993, 1994 and 1995 as set forth below has been derived from the audited consolidated financial statements of Taj Associates included elsewhere in this Prospectus. The historical financial information of Taj Associates as of December 31, 1991, 1992 and 1993, and for the years ended December 31, 1991 and 1992 as set forth below has been derived from the audited consolidated financial statements of Taj Associates not included in this Prospectus. All financial information should be read in conjunction with "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations--Taj Associates," "Unaudited Pro Forma Financial Information" and the consolidated and condensed financial statements and related notes thereto included elsewhere in this Prospectus. [Download Table] YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, ----------------------------------------------------- 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- (IN THOUSANDS) STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS DATA: Revenues: Gaming................. $ 380,997 $ 414,045 $ 442,064 $ 461,622 $ 501,378 Other.................. 111,251 116,958 113,291 117,738 116,368 --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- Gross Revenues........ 492,248 531,003 555,355 579,360 617,746 Promotional allowances............ 53,935 61,250 56,444 62,178 63,998 --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- Net Revenues.......... 438,313 469,753 498,911 517,182 553,748 Costs and Expenses: Gaming................. 204,513 227,394 237,566 260,472 283,786 Other.................. 39,181 39,125 40,605 40,697 39,842 General and Administrative........ 100,191 98,819 99,424 99,629 96,843 Depreciation and Amortization.......... 36,202 36,388 36,858 39,750 43,387 Restructuring costs.... 26,398 -- -- -- -- --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- Income from operations............ 31,828 68,027 84,458 76,634 89,890 --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- Net interest expense... (100,683) (103,126) (106,997) (113,292) (116,513) Extraordinary gain(a).. 259,618 -- -- -- -- --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- Net Income (loss)...... $ 188,513 $ (35,099) $ (22,539) $ (36,658) $ (26,623) ========= ========= ========= ========= ========= Balance Sheet Data (at end of period): Cash and cash equivalents........... $ 22,535 $ 34,062 $ 58,044 $ 61,196 $ 88,941 Property and equipment- net................... 766,135 742,129 722,834 706,785 690,987 Total assets........... 814,051 802,556 811,508 807,612 821,793 Total long-term debt, net of current maturities............ 573,844 595,682 625,765 656,701 694,192 Total capital.......... 167,837 130,913 106,641 67,812 39,635 -------- (a) The extraordinary gain of $259,618 for the year ended December 31, 1991 reflects a $204,276 accounting adjustment to carry the Old Taj Bonds at fair market value based on current interest rates at the date of issuance (effective rate of approximately 18%), and $20,000 related to settlement of the subcontractors' note payable, with the balance representing a discharge of accrued interest on indebtedness. 44
424B145th Page of 203TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 45th
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS GENERAL As the Company commenced operations on June 12, 1995 and its results of operations are primarily those of Plaza Associates, a discussion and analysis of the financial condition and results of operations of Plaza Associates is set forth below. Neither the Company nor any of its subsidiaries has any significant operating history, other than Plaza Associates, although THCR Holdings has incurred certain expenses including interest on the Senior Notes and Trump Indiana has incurred significant expenses relating to the development of the Indiana Riverboat. See "--Liquidity and Capital Resources". The partnership agreement governing THCR Holdings provides that all business activities of the Company must be conducted through THCR Holdings or subsidiary partnerships or corporations. Also set forth below is a discussion and analysis of the financial condition and results of operations of Taj Associates. PLAZA ASSOCIATES RESULTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1995 AND 1994 Gaming revenues were $298.1 million for the year ended December 31, 1995, an increase of $36.6 million or 14.0% from gaming revenues of $261.5 million in 1994. This increase in gaming revenues consisted of an increase in both table games and slot revenues. While 1994 was adversely affected by unfavorable winter weather, construction and management turnover, management believes that the increase in gaming revenues in 1995 is also due to an increased level of demand evident in the Atlantic City market generally, as well as to management's marketing and other initiatives, including the introduction of new slot machines and table games, the addition of bill acceptors on slot machines, an increase in casino floor square footage and an increase in promotional allowances. Slot revenues were $201.7 million for the year ended December 31, 1995, an increase of $33.0 million or 19.5% from $168.7 million in 1994. This increase was primarily due to certain factors mentioned in the foregoing paragraph including the implementation of an aggressive slot marketing program. Table games revenues were $96.4 million for the year ended December 31, 1995, an increase of $3.6 million or 3.9% from table games revenues of $92.8 million in 1994. This was primarily due to an increase in table games drop (i.e., the dollar value of chips purchased) by $27.0 million or 4.5% for the year ended December 31, 1995 from 1994. During the year ended December 31, 1995, gaming credit extended to customers was approximately 17.7% of overall table play, an increase of approximately 0.7% from 1994. At December 31, 1995, gaming receivables amounted to approximately $13.8 million, an increase of approximately $0.1 million from 1994, with allowances for doubtful gaming receivables of approximately $7.9 million, a decrease of approximately $0.6 million from 1994. Other revenues were $74.2 million for the year ended December 31, 1995, an increase of $7.3 million or 10.9% from other revenues of $66.9 million in 1994. Other revenues include revenues from rooms, food and beverage and miscellaneous items. This increase primarily reflects increases in food and beverage revenues attendant to higher levels of gaming activity and promotional allowances and expenses. Promotional allowances were $38.9 million for the year ended December 31, 1995, an increase of $5.6 million or 16.8% from $33.3 million in 1994. This increase is primarily attributable to an increase in gaming activity. Gaming costs and expenses were $164.8 million for the year ended December 31, 1995, an increase of $25.3 million or 18.1% from gaming costs and expenses of $139.5 million in 1994. This increase is primarily due to increased promotional and operating expense and taxes associated with increased levels of gaming revenues from 1994. 45
424B146th Page of 203TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 46th
General and administrative expenses were $68.6 million for the year ended December 31, 1995, a decrease of $4.5 million or 6.2% from general and administrative expenses of $73.1 million in 1994. This decrease is primarily the result of cost containment measures. Income from operations was $59.8 million for the year ended December 31, 1995, an increase of $16.4 million or 37.8% from income from operations of $43.4 million in 1994. Net interest expense was $43.3 million for the year ended December 31, 1995, a decrease of $4.9 million or 10.2% from net interest expense of $48.2 million in 1994. This decrease is attributable to the retirement of the PIK Notes in June 1995 partly offset by the increased interest expense associated with equipment financing and capital leases incurred during 1995. Other non-operating expense was $5.7 million for the year ended December 31, 1995, an increase of $0.8 million or 16.3% from non-operating expense of $4.9 million in 1994. This increase is primarily attributable to costs associated with Trump World's Fair. The extraordinary loss of $9,250,000 for the year ended December 31, 1995 relates to the redemption and write-off of unamortized deferred financing costs relating to the repurchase and redemption on June 12, 1995 of all of the PIK Notes and related PIK Note Warrants. RESULTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1994 AND 1993 Gaming revenues were $261.5 million for the year ended December 31, 1994, a decrease of $2.6 million or 1.0% from gaming revenues of $264.1 million in 1993, although gaming revenues increased for the industry generally in Atlantic City for the year ended December 31, 1994 compared to the year ended December 31, 1993. This decrease in gaming revenues consisted of a reduction in both table games and slot revenues. These results were impacted by a number of major ice and snow storms throughout the northeastern United States, during the three months ended March 31, 1994 which severely restricted travel in the region. Bad weather also impacted the Atlantic City market's results for the three months ended March 31, 1993; however, the weather during the comparable period in 1994 was much more severe. The decrease in gaming revenues was also due in part to disruptions caused by an expansion of the casino floor which created operating inefficiencies by temporarily disrupting the normal flow of patrons upon entrance to the casino, as well as detracting from the overall appearance of the casino floor. Also, in 1994 Trump Plaza experienced turnover of certain key management positions which had a negative impact on operations. This negative impact was mitigated by the end of 1994 as new management was hired and began implementing new policies and marketing programs. See "Business--Atlantic City Marketing Strategy--Trump Plaza" and "Management-- Employment Agreements." Slot revenues were $168.7 million for the year ended December 31, 1994, a decrease of $1.8 million or 1.1% from slot revenues of $170.5 million in 1993. This decrease was due in part to the sensitivity of slot revenues to certain of the factors specified in the foregoing paragraph. Plaza Associates elected to discontinue certain progressive slot programs, thereby reversing certain accruals into revenue which had the effect of improving slot revenue by $0.6 million for the year ended December 31, 1994. Table games revenues were $92.8 million for the year ended December 31, 1994, a decrease of $0.8 million or 0.9% from table games revenues of $93.6 million in 1993. This decrease was primarily due to a reduction in table games drop by $26.7 million or 4.3% for the year ended December 31, 1994 from 1993, offset by an increase in the table games hold percentage (the percentage of table drop retained by Plaza Associates) to 15.5% for the year ended December 31, 1994 from 14.9% in 1993. During the year ended December 31, 1994, gaming credit extended to customers was approximately 17% of overall table play, a decrease of 1% from 1993. At December 31, 1994, gaming receivables amounted to approximately $13.7 million, a decrease of approximately $2.3 million from 1993, with allowances for doubtful gaming receivables of approximately $8.5 million, a decrease of approximately $1.9 million from 1993. 46
424B147th Page of 203TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 47th
Other revenues were $66.9 million for the year ended December 31, 1994, a decrease of $2.3 million or 3.3% from other revenues of $69.2 million in 1993. This decrease in other revenues primarily reflects decreases in food and beverage revenue resulting from changes in bus couponing. Promotional allowances were $33.3 million for the year ended December 31, 1994, an increase of $0.5 million or 1.5% from $32.8 million in 1993. This increase is attributable to increased marketing and promotional activities. Gaming costs and expenses were $139.5 million for the year ended December 31, 1994, an increase of $2.6 million or 1.9% from gaming costs and expenses of $136.9 million in 1993. This increase was primarily due to increased marketing costs instituted toward the end of 1994. These marketing programs consisted of increased bus programs and direct marketing activities. The increase in marketing costs was offset by decreased gaming taxes associated with the decreased levels of gaming activity and revenues from 1993. General and administrative expenses were $73.1 million for the year ended December 31, 1994, an increase of $1.5 million or 2.1% from the general and administrative expenses of $71.6 million in 1993. This increase resulted primarily from $1.1 million in cash associated with donations to the CRDA for the year ended December 31, 1994. Income from operations was $43.4 million for the year ended December 31, 1994, a decrease of $6.2 million or 12.5% from income from operations of $49.6 million for 1993. Net interest expense was $48.2 million for the year ended December 31, 1994, an increase of $8.3 million or 20.8% from net interest expense of $39.9 million in 1993. This increase is primarily attributable to increased interest expenses associated with the Plaza Notes and the PIK Notes which were outstanding for all of 1994. Other non-operating expense was $4.9 million (including $3.1 million of leasing costs) for the year ended December 31, 1994, an increase of $1.0 million or 25.6% from other non-operating expense of $3.9 million in 1993. This increase is directly attributable to twelve months of costs associated with Trump Plaza East. See Note 6 to the accompanying Financial Statements of Trump AC and Plaza Associates. TAJ ASSOCIATES The following information has been prepared by Taj Associates and provides historical information regarding Taj Associates' operations. RESULTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1995 AND 1994 Net revenues were approximately $553.7 million for the year ended December 31, 1995, an increase of $36.5 million or 7.1% from net revenues of $517.2 million for the year ended December 31, 1994. This increase was primarily due to an increase in gaming revenues. Gaming revenues comprise the major component of net revenues and consist of win from table games, poker, slot machines, horserace simulcasting and keno. Total gaming revenues were $501.4 million for the year ended December 31, 1995, an increase of $39.8 million or 8.6% from total gaming revenues of $461.6 million for the year ended December 31, 1994. These revenues represent a market share of 13.5% of the Atlantic City gaming market in each of 1995 and 1994, based on figures filed with the CCC. Table game win was approximately $201.8 million for the year ended December 31, 1995, an increase of $17.1 million or 9.3% from table game win of $184.7 million for the year ended December 31, 1994. Dollars wagered at table games were $1,192.2 million for the year ended December 31, 1995, an increase of $67.2 million or 6.0% from dollars wagered at table games of $1,125.0 million for the year ended December 31, 1994. Table win percentage was 16.9% for the year ended December 31, 1995, an increase from 16.4% in 1994. Table 47
424B148th Page of 203TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 48th
win percentage, which represents the percentage of dollars wagered retained by Taj Associates, tends to be fairly constant over the long term, but may vary significantly in the short term, due to large wagers by "high rollers." The win percentage for the year ended December 31, 1995 is significantly above Taj Associates' and the industry's historical win percentage, and Taj Associates' win percentage could decrease in the future. During the twelve months ending December 31, 1994 and 1993, Taj Associates' win percentage was approximately 16.4% and 16.3% respectively. The Atlantic City average for the years ended December 31, 1995, 1994 and 1993 was approximately 15.8%, 15.8% and 15.6% respectively. Management believes that a significant factor in Taj Associates' table game win being higher than the Atlantic City average is its mix of higher hold table games. Slot revenues were approximately $279.2 million for the year ended December 31, 1995, an increase of $21.3 million or 8.3% from slot revenues of $257.9 million for the year ended December 31, 1994. Dollars wagered in slot machines was $3,376.5 million for the year ended December 31, 1995, an increase of $436.4 million or 14.8% from dollars wagered in slot machines of $2,940.0 million for the year ended December 31, 1994. This increase was offset by a decrease in slot win percentage to 8.3% in 1995 from 8.8% in 1994. The increase in slot machine wagering and the reduced slot win percentage is consistent with the industry trend in Atlantic City in recent years. In addition to table game and slot revenues, Taj Associates' keno/poker/simulcasting operations generated approximately $17.2 million in poker revenues, $1.4 million of simulcasting revenue and $1.8 million of keno revenue in 1995, compared to $16.3 million of poker revenue, $1.4 million of simulcasting revenue and $1.3 million of keno revenue in 1994. Keno operations commenced June 15, 1994. Increases in gaming revenues during the year ended December 31, 1995 as compared to the year ended December 31, 1994 were attributable primarily to (i) the increase in dollars wagered on slots relative to the depressed 1994 levels caused by severe winter weather during the first three months of the year, (ii) the increase in dollars wagered on table games and the improved win percentage, both of which were substantially attributable to international high level players and (iii) the general growth of the Atlantic City market. Nongaming revenues consist primarily of room, food, beverage and entertainment. For the years ended December 31, 1995 and 1994, these revenues totaled $116.4 million and $117.8 million, respectively. Room revenue of approximately $43.3 million in 1995 was the result of an occupancy rate of 91.2% and an average room rate of $104.04. In 1994, room revenue of $41.8 million was the result of an occupancy rate of 92.4% and an average room rate of $99.19. In the food and beverage outlets, Taj Associates generated revenues of approximately $57.2 million and $58.0 million during 1995 and 1994, respectively. The approximately $0.8 million decrease is primarily attributable to the decrease in the average food check to $11.62 in 1995 from $11.68 in 1994 and the elimination of the private bar in guest rooms. The decrease in food and beverage revenue reflects both fewer complimentaries offered to patrons (which are recorded both as revenue and as a promotional allowance) and reduced food prices designed to stimulate cash sales. The decrease in other revenue of approximately $2.0 million was primarily attributable to a decrease in entertainment revenue of approximately $1.6 million resulting from fewer in-house sponsored events and an increased emphasis on promoter sponsored entertainment events in 1995 versus events sponsored by Taj Associates in 1994. Promotional allowances were $64.0 million for the year ended December 31, 1995, an increase of $1.8 million from promotional allowances of $62.2 million for the year ended December 31, 1994. Promotional allowances were 10.4% of gross revenues in 1995 compared to 10.7% in 1994, reflecting Taj Associates' efforts to increase control over complimentaries while increasing gaming revenues. Gaming expenses increased approximately $23.3 million or 9.0% for the year ended December 31, 1995 from the year ended December 31, 1994, primarily due to increased marketing/promotional costs associated with increased gaming revenues. Both room and food and beverage expenses remained generally constant. General and administrative expenses decreased primarily due to the nonrecurrence of costs for settlement of litigation 48
424B149th Page of 203TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 49th
which were incurred during 1994. Costs for settlement of litigation for the year ended December 31, 1995 decreased by approximately $3.7 million or 100% to $0 from the year ended December 31, 1994. Depreciation expense increased in 1995 compared to 1994 due to increased capital expenditures on replacement furniture, fixtures and equipment and the shorter lives associated therewith. Total operating expenses as a percentage of net revenue decreased to 83.8% for the year ended December 31, 1995 compared to 85.2% for the year ended December 31, 1994. As a result of the foregoing factors, income from operations was $89.9 million for the year ended December 31, 1995, an increase of $13.3 million or 17.3% from income from operations of $76.6 million for the year ended December 31, 1994. The $5.1 million or 4.4% increase in interest expense is attributable to (i) the increased amount of principal outstanding resulting from the issuance of Taj Bonds to satisfy the Additional Amount (as defined in the Taj Bond Indenture) and (ii) the increased accretion of the discount on the Taj Bonds as they approach maturity. RESULTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1994 AND 1993 Net revenues were $517.2 million for the year ended December 31, 1994, an increase of $18.3 million or 3.7% from net revenues of $498.9 million for the year ended December 31, 1993. Gaming revenues, which comprise the major component of total revenues and consist of win from table games, poker, slot machines, horserace simulcasting and keno, were approximately $461.6 million in 1994, an increase of $19.5 million or 4.4% from gaming revenues of $442.1 million in 1993. The increase in gaming revenues occurred while the overall Atlantic City gaming industry experienced an increase in gaming revenue of 3.9%. These revenues represent a market share of the Atlantic City market of approximately 13.5% in each of 1994 and 1993, based on figures filed with the CCC. Table game win was approximately $184.7 million for the year ended December 31, 1994, an increase of $11.3 million or 6.5% from table game win of $173.4 million in 1993. Dollars wagered at table games was $1,125.0 million in 1994, an increase of $63.0 million or 5.9% from dollars wagered at table games of $1,062.0 million in 1993. Table win percentage (i.e., percentage of dollars wagered that were retained by Taj Associates) increased to 16.4% in 1994 from 16.3% in 1993. For the year ended December 31, 1994, slot win was approximately $257.9 million, a decrease of $2.4 million or 0.9% from slot win of $260.3 million in 1993. The decrease was largely due to a decrease in the slot win percentage. Slot win percentages were 8.8% in 1994 and 9.3% in 1993. Dollars wagered at slot machines were $2,940.1 million in 1994, an increase of $82.2 million or 2.9% from the dollars wagered at slot machines of $2,857.9 million in 1993. The decrease in slot win percentage and the increase in slot machine wagering is consistent with the industry trend in Atlantic City in recent years. In addition to table game and slot revenues, Taj Associates' newly opened keno room and expanded poker/simulcasting operations generated approximately $16.3 million of revenues from poker, $1.4 million of revenues from simulcasting and $1.3 million of revenues from keno in 1994 compared to approximately $7.5 million in poker revenue and $0.8 million in simulcasting revenue for the year ended December 31, 1993. Poker/Simulcasting operations commenced in June 1993 while keno operations commenced on June 15, 1994. Nongaming revenues consist primarily of room, food, beverage and entertainment revenues. Nongaming revenues were $117.7 million for the year ended December 31, 1994, an increase of $4.4 million or 3.9% from nongaming revenues of $113.3 million in 1993. This increase was attributable primarily to an increase in food and beverage revenue of approximately $2.1 million or 3.8%, and an increase in room revenue of approximately $1.2 million or 2.9%. Food and beverage revenue and room revenue were $58.0 million and $41.8 million, respectively, for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1994, an increase from food and beverage revenue and room revenue of $56.0 million and $40.7 million, respectively, in 1993. The increase in food and beverage revenue 49
424B150th Page of 203TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 50th
was partially attributable to the increase of the average food check to $11.68 in 1994 from $10.82 in 1993 and the increased banquet functions associated with gaming promotions. Room occupancy was 92.4% and 92.5% and the average room rate was $99.19 and $96.38 for the years ended December 31, 1994 and 1993, respectively. Promotional allowances were $62.2 million in 1994, an increase of $5.8 million from promotional allowances of $56.4 million in 1993. Promotional allowances were 10.7% of gross revenues in 1994 compared to 10.2% of gross revenues in 1993, reflecting the more aggressive marketing posture necessary in order to maintain or achieve increases in gaming revenues comparable to 1993. Gaming expenses were $260.5 million in 1994, an increase of $22.9 million or 9.6% from gaming expenses of $237.6 million in 1993, primarily due to increased marketing promotional costs directed at slot machine and table game play and operating expenses associated with the new or expanded games of poker, simulcasting and keno. During the year ended December 31, 1994, room expenses increased slightly and food and beverage expenses decreased slightly over the comparable period in 1993, reflecting continuing cost controls in this area. General and administrative expenses increased slightly, primarily due to costs associated with a settlement of outstanding litigation, offset by decreases in real property taxes resulting from settlement of appeals. Costs for settlement of litigation were approximately $3.7 million in 1994, an increase of $3.7 million or 100% from 1993. Real property taxes were $12.2 million in 1994, a decrease of approximately $4.9 million or 28.7% from real property taxes of $17.1 million for 1993. Were it not for these items, costs in this category would have increased approximately $2.0 million over the comparable period in 1993. Depreciation expense increased in 1994 compared to 1993 due to increased capital expenditures on replacement furniture, fixtures and equipment and the shorter lives associated therewith. Total operating expenses as a percentage of net revenue increased to 85.2% in 1994 from 83.1% in 1993. Interest expense was $115.3 million in 1994, an increase of $6.9 million from interest expense of $108.4 million in 1993. The increase is attributable to the increased amount of principal outstanding resulting from the issuance of the Taj Bonds to satisfy the Additional Amount (as defined), the increased accretion of discount on the Taj Bonds as they approach maturity and professional fees incurred during the first six months of 1994 related to the proposed recapitalization, which was not consummated. As a result of the foregoing factors, income from operations was $76.6 million in 1994, a decrease of $7.9 million or 9.3% from income from operations of $84.5 million in 1993. Taj Associates experienced a net loss of $36.7 million for 1994 as compared to a net loss of $22.5 million for 1993. LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES General. On June 12, 1995, the Company consummated the June 1995 Stock Offering of 10 million shares of Common Stock at the offering price of $14.00 per share, resulting in aggregate gross proceeds to the Company of $140,000,000, and THCR Holdings and THCR Funding consummated the June 1995 Note Offering. The proceeds to the Company from the June 1995 Stock Offering were contributed by the Company to THCR Holdings in return for an approximately 60% general partnership interest in THCR Holdings. THCR Holdings, in turn, has used net proceeds from the June 1995 Offerings through December 31, 1995 for the following purposes: (a) repurchase and redemption of the PIK Notes and PIK Note Warrants (including accrued interest payable) for $86,209,000, (b) exercise of the option to acquire Trump World's Fair (the "Trump World's Fair Purchase Option") for $58,150,000, (c) construction costs for Trump World's Fair of $13,346,000, (d) construction costs at Trump Plaza East of $15,150,000 and (e) construction and land acquisition costs of $29,999,000 for the Indiana Riverboat. The balance of the proceeds have been and will be used for the completion of the construction at Trump Plaza, Trump Plaza East, Trump World's Fair and the Indiana Riverboat, as well as for general corporate purposes. 50
424B151st Page of 203TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 51st
The Senior Note Indenture restricts the ability of THCR Holdings to make distributions to partners or pay dividends, as the case may be, unless certain financial ratios are achieved, and the Mortgage Note Indenture will contain further restrictions on Trump AC. Further, given the rapidly changing competitive environment and the risks associated with the Company's proposed expansion plans, the Company's future operating results are highly conditional and could fluctuate significantly. Moreover, as a condition to the June 1995 Note Offering, THCR Holdings and THCR Funding entered into a Cash Collateral and Disbursement Agreement (the "Cash Collateral Agreement") with First Bank National Association in its respective capacities as Trustee and Disbursement Agent (each as defined therein). The Cash Collateral Agreement called for initial deposits to custodial accounts which are restricted in use for (a) Trump Indiana for the ship and land projects, (b) Trump Plaza construction projects, including the exercise of the Trump World's Fair Purchase Option and construction projects at Trump Plaza East and Trump World's Fair and (c) the first two interest payments on the Senior Notes. As of December 31, 1995, $12,013,000 was restricted for the second interest payment on the Senior Notes and is reflected as restricted cash in the Company's condensed consolidated balance sheets. The balance of restricted funds as of December 31, 1995 consisted of approximately $4,001,000 to be used at Trump Indiana and approximately $36,029,000 to be used at Trump World's Fair, and such amounts are reflected as cash restricted for future construction as a non-current asset in the Company's balance sheets. With these restricted funds, as well as cash flow from operating activities, and the financings discussed above (some of which still remain to be obtained), management believes that sufficient funds will be available to complete the projects that are currently in development. In addition, Plaza Associates may be obligated to comply with certain proposed regulations of the Occupational Safety and Health Administration ("OSHA"), if adopted. The Company is unable to estimate the cost, if any, to Plaza Associates of such compliance. See "Regulatory Matters--Other Laws and Regulations." Further, the ability of Plaza Associates to make payments of dividends or distributions (except for payment of interest) through Trump AC to THCR Holdings may be restricted by the CCC. Similarly, the ability of Trump Indiana to make payments of dividends or distributions to THCR Holdings may be restricted by the IGC. See "Regulatory Matters." Plaza Associates. Cash flow from operating activities is Plaza Associates' principal source of liquidity. Cash flow from operating activities was $26.9 million for the year ended 1995. The increase of $6.9 million in net cash provided by operating activities as compared to 1994 principally reflects increased income from operations. Capital expenditures of $109.8 million for the year ended December 31, 1995 increased approximately $89.3 million from 1994. Capital expenditures attributable to Trump Plaza East were approximately $8.7 million and $24.9 million for the years ended December 31, 1994 and 1995. Capital expenditures attributable to Trump World's Fair were approximately $73.7 million for 1995. Capital expenditures for improvements to existing facilities were $11.8 million and $11.2 million for the years ended December 31, 1994 and 1995. See "Business--Facilities and Amenities--Trump Plaza." The Company has approximately $15.7 million in additional consolidated long- term indebtedness, including, as of December 31, 1995, approximately $3.0 million due under outstanding mortgage notes described under "Business-- Properties--Trump Plaza." Approximately $2.9 million of such indebtedness will mature through December 31, 1996. Management expects that this debt will be repaid with cash from operating activities. At December 31, 1995, Plaza Associates had combined working capital of $6.6 million, which included a receivable from the CRDA of $6.0 million for reimbursable improvements made to the Trump Plaza East, which receivable is currently the subject of litigation. See "Business--Legal Proceedings--Plaza Associates." At December 31, 1994, Plaza Associates had a combined working capital deficit totalling $7.1 million, which also included such receivable. In 1993, Plaza Associates received the approval of the CCC, subject to certain conditions, for the expansion of its hotel facilities at Trump Plaza East. As part of the Trump Plaza Expansion, management commenced the 51
424B152nd Page of 203TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 52nd
expansion and renovation of rooms at Trump Plaza East and as of the date hereof, the casino and 326 (of 349) hotel rooms and suites had opened. Trump World's Fair renovations are scheduled for completion during the second quarter of 1996. See "Risk Factors--High Leverage and Fixed Charges," "-- Atlantic City Properties Expansion," "--The Indiana Riverboat" and "-- Considerations with Respect to the Acquisition or Development of Additional Gaming Ventures." As a result of the Trump Plaza Expansion, Plaza Associates will be permitted, subject to certain conditions, to increase, and is in the process of increasing, Trump Plaza's casino floor space to 90,000 square feet. Plaza Associates petitioned the CCC to permit it to increase such space to 100,000 square feet pursuant to a statutory amendment which became effective January 25, 1995. In its May 18, 1995 declaratory rulings with respect to this petition, the CCC determined, among other things, that the approved hotel comprised of Trump Plaza's main tower and Trump Plaza East is permitted to contain a maximum of 100,000 square feet of casino space. Plaza Associates added to Trump Plaza approximately 9,000 square feet in April 1994, 1,000 square feet in July 1994, and 3,000 square feet in December 1994. At December 31, 1995, the total casino square footage was approximately 73,600 square feet. On February 16, 1996, an additional approximately 17,000 square feet of casino space was opened at Trump Plaza and Trump Plaza East. Pursuant to the Trump Plaza East Purchase Option, which expires on June 30, 1998, Plaza Associates may purchase both the fee and leasehold interest comprising Trump Plaza East. See "Management--Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation--Certain Related Party Transactions of Trump--Plaza Associates." Until such time as the Trump Plaza East Purchase Option is exercised or expires, Plaza Associates is obligated to pay the net expenses associated with Trump Plaza East, including, without limitation, current real estate taxes (approximately $1.2 million per year based upon current assessed valuation) and annual lease payments of $3.1 million per year. Under the Trump Plaza East Purchase Option, Plaza Associates has the right to acquire Trump Plaza East for a purchase price of $28.0 million through December 31, 1996, increasing by $1.0 million annually thereafter until expiration on June 30, 1998. In addition, Plaza Associates has the right of first offer upon any proposed sale of all or any portion of the fee interest in Trump Plaza East during the term of the Trump Plaza East Purchase Option (the "Right of First Offer"). Under the terms of the Trump Plaza East Purchase Option, if Plaza Associates defaults in making payments due under the terms of the Trump Plaza East Purchase Option, Plaza Associates would be liable to the grantor of the Trump Plaza East Purchase Option for the sum of (a) the present value of all remaining payments to be made by Plaza Associates pursuant to the Trump Plaza East Purchase Option during the term thereof and (b) the cost of demolition of all improvements then located at Trump Plaza East unless such improvements had been accepted in writing by the grantor. See "Risk Factors-- Atlantic City Properties Expansion." Plaza Associates intends to exercise the Trump Plaza East Purchase Option in connection with the Merger Transaction. Management believes that the net proceeds of the June 1995 Offerings and equipment financings allocated to Trump Plaza East and cash flow from operations should be sufficient to complete the planned renovations of Trump Plaza East at a remaining cost, at December 31, 1995, of approximately $8.7 million. Pursuant to the Right of First Offer, Plaza Associates has ten days after receiving written notice from the grantor of the proposed sale to commit to exercise the right to acquire Trump Plaza East at the lesser of the proposed sale price and the applicable exercise price under the Trump Plaza East Purchase Option. If Plaza Associates commits to exercise the Right of First Offer, it has ten days from the date of the commitment to deposit $3,000,000 with the grantor, to be credited towards the purchase price or to be retained by the grantor if the closing, through no fault of the grantor, does not occur within ninety days (or, subject to certain conditions, 120 days) of the date of the commitment. There can be no assurance that Plaza Associates would have the liquidity necessary to exercise its Right of First Offer on a timely basis should it be required; however, a portion of the proceeds from the Offerings will be used to exercise the Trump Plaza East Purchase Option. Approximately $58 million of the net proceeds of the June 1995 Offerings were used to exercise the Trump World's Fair Purchase Option. Management believes that the net proceeds of the June 1995 Offerings, together with additional equipment financing, will be sufficient to fund the additional approximately $42.5 million required to complete renovation of and open Trump World's Fair in the second quarter of 1996, although there 52
424B153rd Page of 203TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 53rd
can be no assurance given to that effect. Associated with the opening of Trump World's Fair, management anticipates incurring approximately $5.3 million of pre-opening costs, which will be expensed at the time of its opening. Pursuant to the terms of an agreement, dated January 24, 1993, between Plaza Associates and Trump Plaza Management Corp. ("TPM") (the "TPM Services Agreement"), in consideration for services provided, Plaza Associates pays TPM each year an annual fee of $1.0 million in equal monthly installments and reimburses TPM on a monthly basis for all reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred by TPM in performing its obligations under the TPM Services Agreement, up to certain amounts. Approximately $1.3 million, $1.3 million and $1.2 million of payments under the TPM Services Agreement were expensed for the years ended December 31, 1995, 1994 and 1993, respectively. Payments received under the TPM Services Agreement are currently pledged by TPM to secure lease payments for a helicopter that TPM makes available to Plaza Associates. Pending approval by the lessor of the helicopter, it is currently contemplated that the stock of TPM will be transferred by Trump to THCR Holdings, which will in turn assume the lease and related obligations. See "Management-- Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation-- Certain Related Party Transactions of Trump--Plaza Associates." Trump Indiana. Pursuant to the terms of the certificate of suitability issued to Trump Indiana, Trump Indiana must comply with certain statutory and other requirements imposed by the IGC. Failure to comply with the foregoing conditions and/or failure to commence riverboat excursions by June 28, 1996, may result in the revocation of the certificate of suitability. There can be no assurance that the Company and/or Trump Indiana will be able to comply with the terms of the certificate of suitability or that a riverboat owner's license will ultimately be granted. The Company anticipates that its riverboat owner's license (which would supersede the certificate of suitability) would impose substantially similar conditions on the operations of the Indiana Riverboat to those set forth in the certificate of suitability, although no assurances may be made. In addition to the approximately $84 million anticipated to be spent prior to commencing the operations of the Indiana Riverboat in the second quarter of 1996, during its initial five-year license term, an additional $69 million of funds (consisting of approximately $48 million for the construction of a hotel and other amenities and $21 million for infrastructure improvements and other municipal uses) will be required to be spent by Trump Indiana in connection with the Indiana Riverboat facility and related commitments, including commitments required in connection with the licensure process. The sources of the initial $84 million include, and are anticipated to include: $34 million from the proceeds of the June 1995 Offerings, $17.5 million from vessel financing, $10 million from slot machine financing, $12.5 million from a mortgage on Trump Indiana's interest in the Buffington Harbor site and/or from a working capital facility and $10 million from operating leases. Trump Indiana has received commitments for $17.5 million in vessel financing and nearly $2 million in equipment financing and has signed a letter of intent for an additional $14.2 million in equipment financing (including approximately $8 million for slot machines). Trump Indiana is seeking commitments for the additional financing required to commence the operations of the Indiana Riverboat. The remaining $69 million required to be spent over the initial five-year license term is expected to be funded with cash from operations or additional borrowings. See "Risk Factors--The Indiana Riverboat." Trump Indiana is a party to a loan and security agreement, as amended, with debis Financial Services, Inc. ("dFS") pursuant to which dFS will provide, subject to the terms and conditions thereof, $17.5 million in financing for the gaming vessel. As of April 5, 1996, dFS had provided Trump Indiana with approximately $15.1 million pursuant to such agreement. Trump Indiana and Barden entered into the BHR Agreement relating to the formation of BHR. Pursuant to the BHR Agreement, BHR will own, develop and operate all common land-based and waterside operations in support of each of Trump Indiana's and Barden's separate riverboat casinos at Buffington Harbor. Trump Indiana and Barden will each be equally responsible for the development and operating expenses of BHR. Upon its formation, BHR was capitalized with the contribution by Trump Indiana of ownership of the Buffington Harbor site and the contribution by Barden of $6.75 million. Barden has subsequently contributed approximately $14 53
424B154th Page of 203TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 54th
million for construction costs to equal the costs previously funded by Trump Indiana; thereafter, Trump Indiana and Barden will share all of the development and operating expenses of BHR equally. There can be no assurance that the Company or Trump Indiana will be able to fund from operations or to finance on terms satisfactory to the Company or Trump Indiana any future required expenditures or, if available, other such indebtedness would be permitted under existing debt instruments of the Company. Furthermore, the Company will also be dependent on the ability of Barden to pay for its share of the development and operating expenses of BHR and there can be no assurance that Barden will be able to fund such expenses. Associated with the opening of the Indiana Riverboat, management anticipates incurring $5.75 million of pre- opening costs, which will be expensed at the time of the opening. See "Risk Factors--The Indiana Riverboat." The Company (without its subsidiaries). The Company has no independent means of generating revenues and its sole source of liquidity is distributions and other permitted payments from THCR Holdings. As of December 31, 1995, the Company did not have any long or short-term indebtedness and is not anticipated to have any in the near future. THCR Holdings has agreed that all expenses of the Company shall, to the maximum extent practicable, be paid directly by THCR Holdings. Any other expenses paid directly by the Company are required to be reimbursed promptly by THCR Holdings and are deemed to be expenses of THCR Holdings. Any other projects pursued by the Company in the future would require additional funds. There can be no assurance that sufficient funds will be available either from cash generated by operating activities or from additional financing sources for such projects. Trump AC. Giving pro forma effect to the consolidation of Taj Associates and the other elements of the Merger Transaction, Trump AC will have approximately $1.2 billion of indebtedness for borrowed money on a consolidated basis, principally representing the Mortgage Notes. See "Capitalization" and "Unaudited Pro Forma Financial Information." Taj Associates. Following the consummation of the Merger Transaction, management plans to undertake an expansion plan of the Taj Mahal, which plans are preliminary and subject to modification. It is currently expected that the expansion will be principally funded out of cash from operations of the Atlantic City Properties and is scheduled to be completed in phases from the first quarter of 1997 through early 1998. The Taj Mahal Expansion, as currently contemplated, involves the construction of an approximately 800 room hotel tower adjacent to the Taj Mahal's existing hotel tower, an approximately 2,000 space expansion of the Taj Mahal's existing self-parking facilities, conversion of the Mark Etess Arena into a new 60,000 square foot circus-themed casino with 2,500 slot machines, and construction of a new arena on a surface parking area located adjacent to the Taj Mahal. See "Risk Factors--Atlantic City Property Expansion." In addition, the Taj Mahal is adding three new nationally recognized themed restaurants: the Hard Rock Cafe, the Rainforest Cafe and the All Star Cafe. Construction costs for each of the themed restaurants will be the obligation of the lessees. However, the lease for the Rainforest Cafe will require Taj Associates to contribute $2.5 million towards construction after the project is completed and the restaurant opens for business. Capital expenditures by Taj Associates totaled approximately $26.5 million, $23.0 million and $16.8 million for the years ended 1995, 1994 and 1993, respectively. Major 1995 capital expenditures included the replacement of slot machines with new slot machines having bill acceptors, hotel room renovations, opening the Dragon Room (an Asian themed table gaming area), new telephone reservation equipment, continued casino floor reconfiguration, carpet replacement, casino signage and limousine replacements. Major 1994 capital expenditures included the expansion of the poker room, the addition of the game of keno to the casino floor, relocation of the lobby cocktail lounge, construction of a new slot player's club, continued casino floor reconfiguration, purchase of new slot machines and hotel room renovations. Major 1993 capital expenditures included parking garage upgrades, restaurant and room renovations, carpet replacement and ongoing casino floor reconfiguration, including slot machines, completion of the Taj Entertainment Complex and modification of existing space to accommodate the new games of race simulcasting and poker. Taj Associates' capital budget for fiscal 1996 totals approximately $28.6 million (excluding any amounts to be expended for the Taj Mahal Expansion) and is expected to be financed principally by cash from operations. 54
424B155th Page of 203TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 55th
The budget includes provision for hotel tower and room renovations, completion of a program to replace older slot machines, construction of a high end slot player gaming area and club, ongoing casino floor reconfiguration and limousine replacements. Taj Associates may be obligated to expend up to $30 million in improvements to the Steel Pier in order to maintain its Coastal Area Facilities Review Act ("CAFRA") Permit, which is a condition to its casino license. In March 1993, Taj Associates obtained a modification of its CAFRA Permit providing for the extension of the required commencement and completion dates of these improvements for one year based upon an interim use of the Steel Pier for an amusement park. Taj Associates received additional one-year extensions, most recently through March 1997, of the required commencement and completion dates of the improvements based upon the same interim use of the Steel Pier for an amusement park pursuant to a sublease with an amusement park operator. See "Business--Properties--Steel Pier." In addition, Taj Associates may be obligated to comply with certain proposed regulations of OSHA, if adopted. Taj Associates is unable to estimate the cost, if any, to Taj Associates of such compliance. See "Regulatory Matters-- Other Laws and Regulations." Taj Associates' capital expenditures historically included a component to expand the facility as well as maintain its first class operation. Historically, amounts necessary to maintain the first class nature of the facility were approximately $6.4 million, $19.2 million and $24.0 million for the years ended 1993, 1994 and 1995, respectively. Taj Associates' capital budget for fiscal 1996 includes approximately $24.3 million to maintain Taj Associates' facilities. Except with respect to the Taj Mahal Expansion, management believes that following the Merger Transaction, cash from the Atlantic City Properties' operations, together with equipment financings, should be sufficient to meet anticipated capital and debt service requirements through 1999. The Taj Mahal Expansion is expected to depend in part on additional debt financing, for which no commitments are in place. In addition, no assurances may be made that Trump AC will successfully replace the Working Capital Facility. Finally, Taj Associates' obligations to the CCC with respect to the Steel Pier may require additional financing. See "Business--Properties." See "Risk Factors--Holding Company Structure; No Anticipation of Dividends," "--Risk in Refinancing and Repayment of Indebtedness; Need for Additional Financing" and "--Atlantic City Properties Expansion." SEASONALITY The gaming industry in Atlantic City is seasonal, with the heaviest activity at Trump Plaza and the Taj Mahal occurring during the period from May through September. Consequently, the Company's operating results during the two quarters ending in March and December would not likely be as profitable as the two quarters ending in June and September. The Company has no operating history in Indiana and is unable to predict seasonality with respect to the Indiana Riverboat. INFLATION There was no significant impact on Plaza Associates' or Taj Associates' respective operations as a result of inflation during 1995, 1994 or 1993. 55
424B156th Page of 203TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 56th
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA FINANCIAL INFORMATION TRUMP HOTELS & CASINO RESORTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS The Unaudited Pro Forma Consolidated Balance Sheet of the Company as of December 31, 1995 and the Unaudited Pro Forma Consolidated Statement of Operations for the year ended December 31, 1995 (the "Unaudited Pro Forma Financial Statements") are set forth below. The Unaudited Pro Forma Consolidated Balance Sheet has been prepared assuming the Merger Transaction had occurred on December 31, 1995. The Unaudited Pro Forma Consolidated Statement of Operations have been prepared assuming that the Merger Transaction had occurred on January 1, 1995. The Unaudited Pro Forma Financial Statements are presented for informational purposes only and do not purport to present what the Balance Sheet would have been had the Merger Transaction, in fact, occurred on December 31, 1995 or what the results of operations for the year ended December 31, 1995 would have been had the Merger Transaction, in fact, occurred on January 1, 1995 or to project the results of operations for any future period. The Unaudited Pro Forma Consolidated Balance Sheet and Statement of Operations of the Company each give effect to (a) the consolidation of Taj Associates, which will be an indirect subsidiary of the Company after the Merger Transaction, (b) the redemption of the Taj Bonds and the Taj Holding Class B Common Stock and the retirement of the Plaza Notes, (c) the Mortgage Note Offering, (d) the Stock Offering, (e) purchase accounting adjustments required by the Merger, (f) the termination of the Taj Services Agreement, (g) the cancellation of payments to Realty Corp. and First Fidelity in connection with the acquisition of the Specified Parcels and (h) the payment to Bankers Trust to obtain releases of liens that Bankers Trust has with respect to certain equity interests in Taj Associates and related guarantees. The Unaudited Pro Forma Consolidated Statement of Operations of the Company gives effect to (i) the June 1995 Offerings for the full period presented and (ii) the Merger Transaction, including those transactions described in (a) through (h) above. The accompanying unaudited financial information assumes that the underwriters' over-allotment option is not exercised in the Stock Offering. The pro forma financial statements do not include (i) the financial statements of Taj Holding as Taj Holding will not be an operating entity or incur any further costs and (ii) the financial statements of Merger Sub, TM/GP, TTMI and TTMC as such companies are not operating entities and have incurred no prior costs. The Merger is expected to be accounted for as a "purchase" for accounting and reporting purposes. The Unaudited Pro Forma Financial Statements should be read in conjunction with the Financial Statements and related notes thereto included elsewhere in this Prospectus and the information set forth in "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations." 56
424B157th Page of 203TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 57th
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA FINANCIAL INFORMATION TRUMP HOTELS & CASINO RESORTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES PRO FORMA CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1995 (IN THOUSANDS) [Enlarge/Download Table] MORTGAGE OTHER TAJ NOTE STOCK MERGER THE COMPANY ASSOCIATES OFFERING OFFERING TRANSACTIONS THE COMPANY ------------ ------------ ---------- -------- ------------ ----------- (HISTORICAL) (HISTORICAL) (PRO FORMA) Current Assets: Cash and cash equiva- $ 19,208 $ 88,941 $1,200,000 (a) $359,036(j) $ (9,900)(g) $ 282,994 lents................. (780,243)(b) (10,000)(k) (390)(c) (50,000)(l) (370,900)(d) (31,538)(m) (28,000)(e) (18,775)(f) (46,450)(g) (36,500)(h) (1,495)(i) Restricted cash........ 12,013 12,013 Accounts receivable, 14,460 17,215 31,675 net................... Inventories............ 2,609 7,161 9,770 Prepaid expenses and 5,171 3,864 9,035 other current assets.. -------- -------- ---------- Total current as- 53,461 117,181 345,487 sets................. Property and Equipment, 408,231 690,987 28,000 (e) 9,900 (g) 1,344,880 net................... 43,347 (l) 40,500 (m) 40,500 (m) 83,415 (n) Investment in Buffing- 21,823 21,823 ton Harbor............ Land rights............ 29,320 29,320 Cash restricted for fu- 40,030 40,030 ture construction..... Note receivable........ 3,000 3,000 Deferred loan costs.... 20,026 46,450 (g) 56,610 (9,866)(d) Other assets........... 8,654 13,625 22,279 -------- -------- ---------- Total assets.......... $584,545 $821,793 $1,863,429 ======== ======== ========== Current Liabilities: Current maturities of long-term debt........ $ 2,901 $ 920 (200)(h) $ 3,621 Accounts payable and accrued expenses...... 24,368 8,335 32,703 Accrued interest pay- 2,498 9,154 (9,144)(f) 1,013 able.................. (1,495)(i) Due to affiliates, 278 974 1,252 net................... Other current liabili- 5,257 35,210 40,467 ties.................. -------- -------- ---------- Total current liabil- ities................ 35,302 54,593 79,056 Other long-term liabili- ties................... 33,373 (9,631)(f) (17,153)(l) 6,589 Taj Bonds, net of dis- count.................. 649,139 (649,139)(b) 0 Plaza Mortgage Notes, net of discount........ 326,652 (326,652)(d) 0 Long-term debt, net of discount and current maturities............. 161,069 161,069 Mortgage Notes.......... 1,200,000 (a) 1,200,000 Other long-term debt.... 6,750 45,053 (44,744)(h) 7,059 Deferred state income taxes.................. 4,181 4,181 -------- -------- ---------- Total Liabilities..... 533,954 782,158 1,457,954 Minority interest....... 40,500 (m) 30,500 (10,000)(k) Capital: Common stock........... 101 125(j) 5 (l) 234 3(m) Contributed capital.... 52,411 123,765 358,911(j) 10,495 (l) 430,776 8,959(m) (123,765)(o) Accumulated (deficit).. (1,921) (84,130) (131,104)(b) 83,415 (n) (56,035) (390)(c) 123,765 (o) (54,114)(d) 8,444 (h) -------- -------- ---------- Total capital......... 50,591 39,635 374,975 -------- -------- ---------- Total Liabilities and Capital............. $584,545 $821,793 $1,863,429 ======== ======== ========== See Notes to Unaudited Pro Forma Financial Information. 57
424B158th Page of 203TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 58th
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA FINANCIAL INFORMATION TRUMP HOTELS & CASINO RESORTS, INC. PRO FORMA CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1995 (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE INFORMATION) [Enlarge/Download Table] PLAZA HOLDING AND PLAZA ASSOCIATES THE COMPANY PRO FORMA THE PRO FORMA ---------------- ---------------- ADJUSTMENTS FOR COMPANY ADJUSTMENTS JANUARY 1, 1995- JUNE 12 1995- JUNE 1995 PRO FORMA TAJ FOR MERGER JUNE 12, 1995 DECEMBER 31 1995 OFFERINGS COMBINED ASSOCIATES TRANSACTION PRO FORMA ---------------- ---------------- --------------- ---------- ---------- ----------- ---------- Revenues: Gaming................ $122,865 $175,208 $ 298,073 $501,378 $ 799,451 Rooms................. 7,676 12,310 19,986 43,309 63,295 Food and Beverage..... 18,537 26,065 44,602 57,195 101,797 Other................. 3,310 6,284 9,594 15,864 25,458 -------- -------- ---------- -------- ---------- Gross Revenues...... 152,388 219,867 372,255 617,746 990,001 Less-Promotional Allowances........... 14,540 24,394 38,934 63,998 102,932 -------- -------- ---------- -------- ---------- Net Revenues........ 137,848 195,473 333,321 553,748 887,069 -------- -------- ---------- -------- ---------- Cost and Expenses: Gaming................ 69,467 95,533 165,000 283,786 448,786 Rooms................. 958 1,305 2,263 15,230 17,493 Food and Beverage..... 7,128 11,178 18,306 24,612 42,918 General and Administrative....... 30,081 42,826 72,907 96,843 $(2,725)(l) 160,076 2,738 (p) (1,743)(q) (7,944)(r) Depreciation and Amortization......... 6,999 9,219 16,218 43,387 416 (l) 64,752 4,731 (s) Other................. 1,397 1,966 3,363 3,363 -------- -------- ---------- -------- ---------- 116,030 162,027 278,057 463,858 737,388 -------- -------- ---------- -------- ---------- Income from Operations.. 21,818 33,446 55,264 89,890 149,681 Interest Income....... 403 3,741 $ 134 (t) 4,278 3,922 8,200 Interest Expense...... (22,516) (35,014) (11,239)(u) (63,711) (120,435) (709)(v) (169,112) 5,058(w) 15,743 (x) Other non-operating... (1,649) (4,094) (5,743) 3,120 (e) (2,623) -------- -------- ---------- -------- ---------- Loss before state income taxes, minority interest and extraordinary loss..... (1,944) (1,921) (9,912) (26,623) (13,854) Benefit for state income taxes ................. (161) -- (161) 161 (z) -- -------- -------- ---------- -------- ---------- Loss before minority interest and extraordinary loss..... (1,783) (1,921) (9,751) (26,623) (13,854) Minority Interest....... -- -- -- 3,300 (y) 3,300 -------- -------- ---------- -------- ---------- Loss before extraordinary loss..... $(1,783) $(1,921) $ (9,751) $(26,623) $ (10,554) ======== ======== ========== ======== ========== Loss per share before extraordinary loss (z).................. $ (0.45) ========== Weighted Average Shares Outstanding (aa)..... 23,444,384 ========== See Notes to Unaudited Financial Information. 58
424B159th Page of 203TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 59th
NOTES TO UNAUDITED PRO FORMA FINANCIAL INFORMATION (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE INFORMATION) PRO FORMA ADJUSTMENTS: (a) To record the issuance of $1,200,000 aggregate principal amount of Mortgage Notes issued by Trump AC Funding, a wholly owned subsidiary of Trump AC. Trump AC and Plaza Associates are, and upon consummation of the Merger Transaction Taj Associates will be, direct or indirect wholly owned subsidiaries of THCR Holdings. (b) To record the redemption of the Taj Bonds, at par, which had a face value of $780,243 and a book value of $649,139 as of December 31, 1995, and an extraordinary loss of $131,494 which includes the redemption of the Taj Holding Class B Common Stock (see note (c) below). (c) To record the payment of $.50 for the redemption of each of the 780,243 outstanding shares of Taj Holding Class B Common Stock as an extraordinary loss. (d) To record the retirement of the Plaza Notes which have a face value of $330,000 and a book value of $326,652 as of December 31, 1995 for $370,900 and related deferred loan costs resulting in an extraordinary loss of $54,114. (e) To record the payment of $28,000 in connection with exercise of the Trump Plaza East Purchase Option and the effect of the termination of the Trump Plaza East lease and the $3,120 of associated annual expense. (f) To record the payment of accrued interest on the redemption of the Taj Bonds as of December 31, 1995, including $9,631 of the Additional Amount. (g) To record the payment of fees and expenses associated with the Merger Transaction. (h) To record the satisfaction of indebtedness under the NatWest Loan which had a book value of $44,944 for $36,500 and an extraordinary gain of $8,444 resulting from such satisfaction. (i) To record the payment of accrued interest on the retirement of the Plaza Notes as of December 31, 1995. (j) To record the net proceeds from the Stock Offering of 12,500,000 shares. (k) To record the payment to Bankers Trust to obtain certain releases of the liens and guarantees that Bankers Trust has in connection with certain indebtedness owed by Trump to Bankers Trust. The obligation under this indebtedness is a personal liability of Trump and, accordingly, the release of indebtedness is considered a payment to Trump and a reduction of the interests attributable to him as such payment would only occur as part of the Merger Transaction. (l) To record the purchase of the Specified Parcels and the release of the Taj Associates-First Fidelity Guarantee, the elimination of the lease payments on the Specified Parcels and the additional depreciation associated with the purchase. The aggregate cost of acquiring the Specified Parcels is $50,000 in cash and 500,000 shares of Common Stock valued at $10,500 (an average value of $21 per share of Common Stock based on the price of the Common Stock several days before and after the date of the amended Merger Agreement). Taj Associates had accrued $17,153 with respect to its obligation under the Taj Associates-First Fidelity Guarantee. (m) To record the contribution by Trump to Trump AC (on behalf, and at the direction, of THCR Holdings) of all of his direct and indirect ownership interest in 50% of Taj Associates and the purchase of the Taj Holding Class A Common Stock by the Company in the Merger. The Company will pay $30 for each of the 1,350,000 outstanding shares of Taj Holding Class A Common Stock, which is payable at the option of the holder in cash or shares of Common Stock ($40,500). Holders of 298,739 shares of Taj Holding Class A Common Stock have elected to receive Stock Consideration and holders of 1,051,261 shares of Taj Holding Class A Common Stock have elected to receive Cash Consideration. As Trump's ownership interest in Taj Associates is 50%, the amount of consideration paid for the publicly held 50% (represented by the Taj Holding Class A Common Stock) has been ascribed as the value of his contribution. 59
424B160th Page of 203TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 60th
NOTES TO UNAUDITED PRO FORMA FINANCIAL INFORMATION (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE INFORMATION) PRO FORMA ADJUSTMENTS: (n) To record the historical book value of Taj Associates and Taj Funding ($39,635), as adjusted for the extraordinary loss on the redemption of the Taj Bonds ($131,494) and, the extraordinary gain resulting from the satisfaction of indebtedness under the NatWest Loan ($8,444), which results in a negative book value of $83,415. (o) To reclassify the remaining capital deficit of Taj Associates to contributed capital as the carryforward accumulated deficit should be that of the Company in accordance with purchase accounting. (p) To record $2,083 of additional general and administrative expenses relating to corporate overhead of the Company and THCR Holdings, and $655 of operating expenses incurred at Trump Indiana prior to opening. (q) To record the elimination of the fee resulting from the termination of the Taj Services Agreement. (r) To reflect the reduction of identifiable costs resulting from the consolidation of departments and the reduction of personnel. Management believes that within two years, annual cost savings from the Merger Transaction will total $18-$20 million. (s) To record the additional depreciation expense resulting from the allocation of the purchase price ($174,315--see notes (g), (m) and (n) above) to property and equipment based on an appraisal. Amounts are being allocated to land ($8,715) and building ($165,600) on a pro rata basis and are being depreciated over the remaining life of the building (35 years). (t) To record interest income on a $3,000 note receivable from Trump at prime plus 1%. On March 27, 1996, this note was cancelled in accordance with its terms based on a recent Common Stock trading price range. (u) To record interest expense (including amortization of deferred financing costs) relating to the Senior Notes. (v) To record interest expense on amounts borrowed under the equipment and vessel financing line. To date, Trump Indiana has obtained a commitment for $17,000, has signed a letter of intent for an equipment lease for $14,200 and has obtained advances of $9,750 at a rate of 10.5%. Although the Company expects to borrow an additional $15,000, no assurances can be given that such financing will be available. See "Risk Factors--The Indiana Riverboat." (w) To eliminate interest expense (including amortization of deferred financing costs) on Plaza Associates' PIK Notes which were redeemed with the proceeds from the June 1995 Offerings. (x) To record adjustments to historical interest expense to give effect to the Merger Transaction as follows: [Download Table] DECEMBER 31, 1995 ------------ Interest expense adjustment: (i)Elimination of interest and discount accretion on redemption of the Taj Bonds and the Plaza Notes........ (146,714) (ii)Elimination of accretion on the Taj Associates-First Fidelity Guarantee..................................... (2,375) (iii)Elimination of interest on the NatWest Loan.......... (4,281) (iv)Elimination of refinancing transaction expenses....... (1,787) (v)Elimination of amortization of deferred offering costs...................................................... (2,973) (vi)Reflect interest and amortization of deferred loan costs on the Mortgage Notes............................ 142,387 -------- Pro Forma Adjustment........................................ $(15,743) ======== 60
424B161st Page of 203TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 61st
NOTES TO UNAUDITED PRO FORMA FINANCIAL INFORMATION (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE INFORMATION) PRO FORMA ADJUSTMENTS: (y) To reflect minority interest as pro forma adjustments result in a loss at THCR Holdings and there is a minority interest basis on the Company pro forma balance sheet. (z) A provision for state income taxes is not required as state tax net operating losses are used to offset pro forma taxable income. (aa) Weighted Average Shares Outstanding includes the number of shares outstanding on December 31, 1995, shares awarded to the Chief Executive Officer of the Company pursuant to the 1995 Stock Plan and the shares to be issued in the Merger Transaction. 61
424B162nd Page of 203TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 62nd
BUSINESS GENERAL The Company will acquire all of the outstanding equity interests of Taj Associates, which owns and operates the Taj Mahal, in connection with the Merger Transaction. The Merger Transaction will create one of the largest casino entertainment companies in the United States by combining two "Four Star" Atlantic City casino hotels, the Indiana Riverboat and all of Trump's future gaming activities. Upon consummation of the Merger Transaction, the Company will own and operate the Taj Mahal, currently Atlantic City's largest casino (in terms of casino square footage), and Trump Plaza, which will have the largest casino in Atlantic City (in terms of casino square footage) upon the completion of the ongoing Trump Plaza Expansion. Following the consummation of the Merger Transaction, the Company also plans to undertake the Taj Mahal Expansion, an expansion program at the Taj Mahal designed to increase its hotel room inventory and casino floor space and expand its entertainment and parking facilities. In addition, the Company expects to commence operations in the second quarter of 1996 of the Indiana Riverboat to be located at Buffington Harbor on Lake Michigan. The Indiana Riverboat will establish the Company's position in the greater Chicago metropolitan area market, which is one of the most successful new gaming markets in the United States. Furthermore, the Company is and will continue to be the exclusive vehicle through which Trump will engage in new gaming activities in both emerging and established gaming jurisdictions. Management believes that the acquisition of the Taj Mahal will strengthen the Company's position as a leader in the casino entertainment industry through its ownership of two successful land-based casino hotels. Furthermore, the Merger Transaction will enhance the Company's presence in the growing Atlantic City market, which, in terms of gaming revenues, has demonstrated a ten-year compound annual growth rate of approximately 5.8% and a growth rate of approximately 9.5% for calendar year 1995 versus calendar year 1994. After giving effect to the Merger Transaction and the Trump Plaza Expansion, the Company will have approximately one-quarter of Atlantic City's casino square footage, slot machines, table games and hotel room inventory. In addition, the combination of the Taj Mahal with Trump Plaza's existing and planned operations will provide opportunities for operational efficiencies, economies of scale and benefits from the expertise and experience of management at the operating entities. Management further believes that the Company's size following the Merger Transaction along with its industry experience and reputation for quality will allow the Company to compete effectively for prime gaming licenses in other jurisdictions. Management believes the Company will benefit from the following factors: . LEADING ATLANTIC CITY FACILITIES. Upon consummation the Trump Plaza Expansion, the Company will own and operate the two largest casino hotel properties in Atlantic City (in terms of casino square footage), both of which are strategically located on The Boardwalk. The Company believes that the Atlantic City Properties' prime locations, reputations for high quality amenities and first-class customer service and targeted marketing strategies are ideally suited to capitalize on the expected continued growth in the Atlantic City gaming market. The Company believes that its leading size and market share in Atlantic City following the consummation of the Merger Transaction will provide it with a competitive advantage in marketing the Atlantic City Properties, particularly to large convention groups and multi-day stay destination resort visitors. . ATLANTIC CITY PROPERTIES EXPANSION. The Company has nearly completed the Trump Plaza Expansion and is developing the plans for the Taj Mahal Expansion, which projects will increase the Atlantic City Properties' gaming space and hotel room capacity, allowing the Company to meet both existing demand and the anticipated demand from the increased number of available rooms and infrastructure improvements that are currently under development to enhance further the "vacation destination appeal" of Atlantic City. 62
424B163rd Page of 203TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 63rd
The following table profiles the Company's casino and hotel capacity following the expansions at the Atlantic City Properties: [Enlarge/Download Table] TRUMP TAJ INDIANA TRUMP PLAZA TAJ MAHAL PLAZA(a) MAHAL RIVERBOAT(b) EXPANSION(c) EXPANSION(d) TOTAL -------- ------- ------------ ------------ ------------ ------- Casino square footage... 75,395 120,000(e) 37,000 64,158 60,000 356,553 Slot machines........... 2,368 3,550 1,500 1,898 2,500 11,816 Table games............. 97 169 73 44 -- 383 Hotel rooms............. 555 1,250 -- 849 800 3,454 -------- (a) Includes the 2,000 square foot area connecting the existing facility with Trump Plaza East and the 75 slot machines included in this area. (b) Scheduled to open in the second quarter of 1996. (c) Includes the 15,000 square foot casino with 400 slot machines and 13 table games and 326 hotel rooms which have already opened at Trump Plaza East. The remaining 14 hotel rooms and suites at Trump Plaza East are scheduled to be opened by the end of April 1996. Also reflects nine super suites scheduled to open early in 1997 and not otherwise included in the "Trump Plaza Expansion." The remaining portion of the Trump Plaza Expansion, Trump World's Fair, is scheduled to open in the second quarter of 1996. (d) Plans for the Taj Mahal Expansion, scheduled to be completed in phases from the first quarter of 1997 through early 1998, are subject to modification. (e) Excludes a 12,000 square foot poker, keno and race simulcasting room which contains 64 poker tables. . OPERATING SYNERGIES. The Company intends to capitalize on the opportunities for efficiencies which can be generated by integrating certain operations of the Atlantic City Properties, which previously have been operated separately. Management has identified cost savings which management estimates, by the end of the second year following the Merger Transaction, to be $18-20 million on an annual basis, although no assurance may be made as to the amount which will be realized. Management believes that it will be able to consolidate certain departments at the Atlantic City Properties, reduce general and administrative expenses through possible personnel reductions and the consolidation of certain marketing efforts and reduce operating costs through efficiencies that are expected to result from the combined purchasing power of the Atlantic City Properties. . INDIANA RIVERBOAT. Trump Indiana has received site approval and a certificate of suitability to develop a gaming project in Buffington Harbor, on Lake Michigan, approximately 25 miles southeast of downtown Chicago. The Indiana Riverboat is one of 11 riverboat gaming projects permitted under current Indiana law, and one of only five to be located in northern Indiana. The Indiana Riverboat is currently scheduled to open for business in the second quarter of 1996. The Indiana Riverboat is planned to have approximately 37,000 square feet of gaming space that will feature 1,500 slot machines and 73 table games, and will be one of the largest riverboat casinos in the United States. The Indiana Riverboat's principal market will be the approximately 6.8 million people residing within 50 miles of Buffington Harbor in the greater Chicago metropolitan area. Approximately 11.2 million and 24.2 million people live within a 100- and 200-mile radius of Buffington Harbor, respectively. . THE "TRUMP" NAME. The Company capitalizes on the widespread recognition of the "Trump" name and its association with high quality amenities and first-class service. To this end, the Company provides a broadly diversified gaming and entertainment experience consistent with the "Trump" name and reputation for quality, tailored to the gaming patron in each market. The Company also benefits from the "Trump" name in connection with its efforts to expand and to procure new gaming opportunities in the United States and abroad, as well as to explore opportunities to establish additional gaming operations, particularly in jurisdictions where the legalization of casino gaming is relatively new or anticipated. ATLANTIC CITY PROPERTIES TRUMP PLAZA Management believes that Trump Plaza's "Four Star" Mobil Travel Guide rating and "Four Diamond" American Automobile Association rating reflect the high quality amenities and services that Trump Plaza provides to its casino patrons and hotel guests. These amenities and services include a broad selection of dining choices, headline entertainment, deluxe accommodations, tennis courts and swimming and health spa facilities. Trump Plaza Expansion. Management believes that as a result of the Trump Plaza Expansion and Trump Plaza's strategic location, Trump Plaza is well positioned to become one of the premier host properties in 63
424B164th Page of 203TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 64th
Atlantic City. The Trump Plaza Expansion is currently scheduled to be completed in the second quarter of 1996 and would increase Trump Plaza's prime central frontage on The Boardwalk to nearly a quarter of a mile. Management also believes that the construction of the new convention center and tourist corridor linking the new convention center with The Boardwalk will enhance the desirability of Atlantic City generally and, as a result of Trump Plaza's central location, will benefit Trump Plaza in particular. In addition, management expects to be able to take advantage of recent gaming regulatory changes that will allow casino space to be directly visible and accessible from The Boardwalk. Trump Plaza's location on The Boardwalk at the end of the main highway into Atlantic City makes it highly accessible for both "drive-in" and "walk-in" patrons. The Company is in the process of renovating and integrating into Trump Plaza, Trump World's Fair, located on The Boardwalk adjacent to the existing Atlantic City Convention Center, which is next to Trump Plaza, at a remaining cost of $42.5 million. Upon completion, Trump World's Fair would add 49,272 square feet of casino floor space, approximately 16,000 of which will be directly accessible from The Boardwalk, and 500 hotel rooms, connected with the current Trump Plaza's main tower by an enclosed walkway overlooking The Boardwalk. Renovations are ongoing at Trump World's Fair and the Company expects, although there can be no assurances, that the renovations at Trump World's Fair will be completed in the second quarter of 1996. See "Risk Factors--Atlantic City Properties Expansion." Trump Plaza has opened the casino and 326 rooms at Trump Plaza East. Management intends to open the remaining 14 hotel rooms and suites at Trump Plaza East by the end of April 1996. Trump Plaza East has approximately 15,000 square feet of casino space and, when fully opened, will have 349 hotel rooms, including nine super suites scheduled to be opened early in 1997. Trump Plaza currently leases Trump Plaza East and intends to exercise its option to acquire it from an unaffiliated entity. See "--Properties--Plaza Associates-- Trump Plaza East" and "Management--Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation--Certain Related Party Transactions of Trump--Plaza Associates." Trump Plaza has been reconfigured to provide a new entranceway to Trump Plaza directly off the Atlantic City Expressway. Management believes the increased hotel capacity as a result of the Trump Plaza Expansion will enable Trump Plaza to better meet demand and accommodate its casino guests, as well as to host additional and larger conventions and corporate meetings. The following table details plans for the Trump Plaza Expansion: [Download Table] TRUMP PLAZA TRUMP PLAZA TRUMP WORLD'S FACILITY(a) EAST(b) FAIR(c) TOTAL ----------- ----------- ------------- ------- Casino square footage............. 75,395 14,886 49,272 139,553 Slot machines..................... 2,368 405 1,493 4,266 Table games....................... 97 12 32 141 Hotel rooms....................... 555 349 500 1,404 --------------------- (a) Includes the 2,000 square foot area connecting the existing facility with Trump Plaza East and the 75 slot machines included in this area. (b) The casino and 326 hotel rooms have already opened. The remaining 14 hotel rooms and suites are scheduled to be open by the end of April 1996. Also reflects nine super suites are scheduled to open early in 1997 and not otherwise included in the "Trump Plaza Expansion." (c) Scheduled to open in the second quarter of 1996. Trump Plaza's management team commenced the Trump Plaza Expansion in 1995 and has recently launched a variety of new initiatives designed to increase the level of casino gaming activity generally at its casino and to attract casino patrons who tend to wager more frequently and in larger denominations than the typical Atlantic City patron. These initiatives include targeted marketing and advertising campaigns directed to select groups of customers in the Boston-New York-Washington, D.C. corridor, the introduction of new slot machines and table games and the addition of bill acceptors on slot machines. THE TAJ MAHAL The Taj Mahal is currently the largest casino hotel facility in Atlantic City (in terms of casino floor square footage) and has ranked first among all Atlantic City casinos in terms of total gaming revenues, table revenues and slot revenues since it commenced operations in 1990. The Taj Mahal capitalizes on the widespread recognition and marquee status of the "Trump" name and its association with high quality amenities and first 64
424B165th Page of 203TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 65th
class service as evidenced by its "Four Star" Mobil Travel Guide rating. Management believes that the breadth and diversity of the Taj Mahal's casino, entertainment and convention facilities and its status as a "must see" attraction will enable the Taj Mahal to benefit from the expected continued growth of the Atlantic City market. In recent years, under the direction of Trump and the management team led by Nicholas L. Ribis, its Chief Executive Officer, Taj Associates has completed construction of the Taj Entertainment Complex, reconfigured and expanded the casino floor to provide race simulcasting, poker wagering and the recently introduced game of keno, opened a private Asian themed table game area and increased the number of poker tables and slot machines. The Taj Mahal's poker room is the largest in Atlantic City, which management believes adds to its overall gaming mix. Taj Associates continually monitors operations to adapt to and anticipate industry trends. Since 1994, the Taj Mahal has embarked on a strategy to refurbish all of its hotel guest rooms and corridors by the end of April 1996 and to replace all of its existing slot machines by the middle of 1996 with new, more efficient machines with bill collectors. Moreover, to further attract high-end players, the Taj Mahal has recently opened the "Dragon Room," an Asian themed table gaming area with 16 table games, and is currently in the process of constructing "Sultan's Palace," a separate 5,900 square-foot high-end slot lounge and private club to be completed in the second quarter of 1996. The Taj Mahal Expansion. Following the consummation of the Merger Transaction, the Company plans to undertake an expansion plan at the Taj Mahal to meet both existing demand and the increase in demand that management anticipates will result from the increased number of rooms and infrastructure improvements that are currently being implemented to enhance further the "vacation destination appeal" of Atlantic City. It is currently expected that the Taj Mahal Expansion will be funded principally out of cash from operations of the Atlantic City Properties and is scheduled to be completed in phases from the first quarter of 1997 through early 1998. The Taj Mahal Expansion, the plans for which are subject to modification, involves the construction of an approximately 2,000 space expansion of the Taj Mahal's existing self- parking facilities and a new 10,000 seat arena adjacent to the Taj Mahal, each scheduled to be completed in mid-1997; the conversion of the current site of the Mark Etess Arena into a new 60,000-square foot circus-themed casino with 2,500 slot machines, scheduled to be completed in 1997; and the construction of an approximately 800 room hotel tower adjacent to the Taj Mahal's existing hotel tower, scheduled to be completed early in 1998. See "Risk Factors-- Atlantic City Properties Expansion--The Taj Mahal." The following table details the plans for the Taj Mahal Expansion: [Download Table] CURRENT TAJ TAJ MAHAL MAHAL FACILITIES EXPANSION TOTAL ---------- --------- ------- Casino square footage............................. 120,000(a) 60,000 180,000 Slot machines..................................... 3,550 2,500 6,050 Table games....................................... 169 -- 169 Hotel rooms....................................... 1,250 800 2,050 --------------------- (a) Excludes a 12,000 square-foot poker, keno and race simulcasting room which contains 64 poker tables. The following table summarizes the different phases of the Taj Mahal Expansion with their associated capital costs: [Download Table] PROJECT PROJECT COST ------- ------- (IN MILLIONS) Parking facility, approximately 2,000 spaces................... $ 26.0 New arena...................................................... 15.0 Circus themed casino........................................... 53.3 Hotel tower, 800 rooms......................................... 100.9 ------ Total........................................................ $195.2 ====== It is expected that the Taj Mahal Expansion, the plans for which are subject to modification, will be principally funded out of the cash from operations of the Atlantic City Properties. If the operations of the Atlantic City Properties do not generate the anticipated cash flow to fund the Taj Mahal Expansion, the ability to complete 65
424B166th Page of 203TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 66th
such expansion will depend on the ability to obtain debt financing for such purposes in addition to that currently contemplated. There can be no assurance that Taj Associates and Plaza Associates will be able to generate sufficient cash flow from operations or to obtain debt financing on terms satisfactory to Trump AC, if at all. ATLANTIC CITY MARKETING STRATEGY In order to provide a sharpened marketing focus at the different properties and appeal to a variety of segments in the Atlantic City marketplace, the Company intends to pursue a targeted marketing approach with respect to the Atlantic City Properties. Trump Plaza. Trump Plaza East has been integrated into Trump Plaza and together are operated as a single casino hotel facility. Trump Plaza will continue the marketing strategies it has found successful in the past, including targeting lucrative high-end drive-in slot customers. Management believes the additional hotel rooms and gaming facilities at Trump Plaza East will better enable Trump Plaza to accommodate the more profitable weekend drive-in patron, who tends to wager more per play and per visit than the typical walk-in or bus patron. Trump World's Fair. Trump World's Fair, which will operate as part of Trump Plaza, will seek to attract the "middle market" segment (primarily bus customers and Boardwalk pedestrian traffic) by offering high value food and entertainment attractions in a festive "World's Fair" atmosphere. The first floor of Trump's World's Fair will feature a Boardwalk level casino offering walk-in customers direct access from The Boardwalk to 581 slot machines. In addition, Trump World's Fair is constructing a new bus terminal that will have a dedicated escalator leading directly to a separate casino entertainment area that will contain a 500-seat buffet style restaurant, an Oriental Pavilion and a casino with 538 slot machines. The new bus terminal and dedicated casino facilities will allow Trump World's Fair to efficiently serve a high volume of bus customers. A smoke-free casino with approximately 385 slot machines and 32 table games along with additional restaurants will be located on the second floor of Trump World's Fair. Moreover, with its prime location adjoining the current Atlantic City Convention Center and near the new Atlantic City Convention Center and its newly refurbished base of 500 rooms and approximately 50,000 square feet of total gaming space, management believes that Trump World's Fair is ideally suited to attract convention visitor traffic. The Taj Mahal. The Taj Mahal will continue to capitalize on its status as Atlantic City's "must see" casino entertainment facility by offering "something for everyone." The Taj Mahal has been successful in attracting all segments of the Atlantic City gaming market because of the size and diversity of its entertainment and gaming facilities. The Taj Mahal has been particularly successful in attracting the segments of the Atlantic City gaming market that tend to wager more frequently and in larger denominations than the typical Atlantic City gaming customer. To attract these high-end players, the Taj Mahal offers international musical and entertainment attractions and has recently opened the Dragon Room, an Asian themed table game area, and is in the process of constructing the Sultan's Palace, a high-end slots lounge and private club. BUSINESS STRATEGY "Comping" Strategy. In order to compete effectively with other Atlantic City casino hotels, the Atlantic City Properties offer complimentary drinks, meals, room accommodations and/or travel arrangements to their patrons ("complimentaries" or "comps"). Management at the Atlantic City Properties focuses promotional activities, including complimentaries, on middle and upper middle market "drive-in" patrons who visit Atlantic City frequently and have proven to be the most profitable market segment. Additionally, as a result of increased regulatory flexibility, the Taj Mahal has implemented a cash comping policy to high-end players in order to compete with similar practices in Las Vegas and to attract international business. Entertainment. Management believes headline entertainment, as well as other entertainment and revue shows, are effective means of attracting and retaining gaming patrons. Trump Plaza offers headline entertainment as part of its strategy to attract high-end and other patrons. Trump Plaza offers headline entertainment weekly during the summer and monthly during the off-season, and also features other entertainment and revue shows. The Xanadu Theater allows the Taj Mahal to offer longer running, more established productions that cater to the 66
424B167th Page of 203TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 67th
tastes of the Taj Mahal's high-end international guests. The Taj Mahal's facilities also include the Mark Etess Arena, an approximately 63,000 square- foot exhibition hall and entertainment facility. The Xanadu Theater, together with the Mark Etess Arena, and, subsequent to the conversion of the Mark Etess Arena, the new arena that is intended to be constructed in connection with the Taj Mahal Expansion afford and are expected to afford the Taj Mahal more flexibility in the use of its facilities for sporting and other headline programs. The Taj Mahal regularly engages well-known musicians and entertainment personalities and will continue to emphasize weekend "marquee" events such as Broadway revues, high visibility sporting events, festivals and contemporary concerts to maintain the highest level of glamour and excitement. Mid-week uses for the facilities include convention events and casino marketing sweepstakes. Player Development/Casino Hosts. The Atlantic City Properties currently employ gaming representatives in New Jersey, New York and other states, as well as several international representatives, to promote Trump Plaza and the Taj Mahal to prospective gaming patrons. Player development personnel host special events, offer incentives and contact patrons directly in an effort to attract high-end table game patrons from the United States, Canada and South America. The Atlantic City Properties' casino hosts assist patrons on the casino floor, make room and dinner reservations and provide general assistance. In addition, targeted marketing to international clientele will be continued and expanded at the Taj Mahal through new sales representatives in Latin America, Mexico, Europe, the Far East and the Middle East. As a special bonus to high-end players, the Taj Mahal offers three clubs for the exclusive use of select customers: the Maharajah Club for table game players, the Presidents Club for high-end slot players, and the Bengal Club for other preferred slot players. The Atlantic City Properties also plan to continue the development of their slot and coin programs through direct mail and targeted marketing campaigns emphasizing the high-end player. Promotional Activities. The Trump Card constitutes a key element in the Atlantic City Properties' direct marketing program. Subject to regulatory constraints, the Trump Card will be used in all of the Company's gaming facilities so as to build a national database of gaming patrons. Slot machine players are encouraged to register for and utilize their personalized Trump Card to earn various complimentaries based upon their level of play. The Trump Card is inserted during play into a card reader attached to the slot machine for use in computerized rating systems. The Company's computer systems record data about the cardholders, including playing preferences, frequency and denomination of play and the amount of gaming revenues produced. The Atlantic City Properties design promotional offers, conveyed via direct mail and telemarketing, to patrons expected to provide revenues based upon their historical gaming patterns. Such information is gathered on slot wagering by the Trump Card and on table game wagering by the casino game supervisors. Promotional activities include the mailing of vouchers for complimentary slot play. The Atlantic City Properties also utilize a special events calendar (e.g., birthday parties, sweepstakes and special competitions) to promote its gaming operations. Bus Program. Trump Plaza and the Taj Mahal each have bus programs which transport approximately 2,400 and 2,700 gaming patrons per day during the week and 3,500 and 3,600 per day on the weekends, respectively. Trump Plaza's Transportation Facility (as defined) contains 13 bus bays and is connected by an enclosed pedestrian walkway to Trump Plaza, and the Taj Mahal's facility contains 18 bus bays. Credit Policy. Historically, the Atlantic City Properties have extended credit to certain qualified patrons. For the years ended December 31, 1993, 1994 and 1995, credit play as a percentage of total dollars wagered at Trump Plaza was approximately 18%, 17%, and 18%, respectively. As part of Trump Plaza's business strategy, Trump Plaza has imposed stricter standards on applications for new or additional credit. For the years ended December 31, 1993, 1994 and 1995, the Taj Mahal's credit play as a percentage of total dollars wagered was approximately 23.5%, 22.8% and 24.5%, respectively. FACILITIES AND AMENITIES TRUMP PLAZA Trump Plaza. The casino in the existing facility of Trump Plaza currently offers 97 table games and 2,368 slot machines. In addition to the casino, Trump Plaza's main tower consists of a 31-story tower with 555 guest rooms, including 62 suites. Trump Plaza's main tower also offers 10 restaurants, a 750-seat cabaret theater, four 67
424B168th Page of 203TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 68th
cocktail lounges, 28,000 square feet of convention, ballroom and meeting room space, a swimming pool, tennis courts and a health spa. In February 1996, Trump Plaza East opened the 15,000 square foot Ocean View Casino and Bar, and has to date opened 326 of its 349 hotel rooms. The Ocean View Casino and Bar is the first gaming room in Atlantic City to combine a casino, bar and entertainment area and features a 70-foot long bar with 27 bar-top slot machines, live entertainment and a 58 square foot video wall. With its high ceilings and windows overlooking the Atlantic Ocean and The Boardwalk, Trump Plaza is creating a new and exciting entertainment environment for its casino patrons. The entry level of Trump Plaza's main tower includes a cocktail lounge, two gift shops, a deli, a coffee shop, an ice cream parlor and a buffet. The casino level houses the casino, a fast food restaurant, an exclusive slot lounge for high-end patrons and a new oceanfront baccarat gaming area. Upon completion, an enclosed walkway will connect Trump Plaza at the casino level with the Atlantic City Convention Center and with Trump World's Fair. Trump Plaza's guest rooms are located in two towers which afford most guest rooms a view of the ocean. While rooms are of varying size, a typical guest room consists of approximately 400 square feet. Trump Plaza's main tower also features 16 one-bedroom suites, 28 two-bedroom suites and 18 "Super Suites." The Super Suites are located on the top two floors of Trump Plaza's main tower and offer luxurious accommodations and 24-hour butler and maid service. The Super Suites and certain other suites are located on the "Club Level" which requires guests to use a special elevator key for access and contains a lounge area that offers food and bar facilities. Trump Plaza's main tower is connected by an enclosed pedestrian walkway to a ten-story parking garage, which can accommodate approximately 2,650 cars, and contains 13 bus bays, a comfortable lounge, a gift shop and waiting area (the "Transportation Facility"). The Transportation Facility provides patrons with immediate access to the casino, and is located directly off the Atlantic City Expressway, the main highway into Atlantic City. In July 1994, Time Warner opened its second largest Warner Brothers Studio Store pursuant to a sublease of the entire first floor of retail space on The Boardwalk at Trump Plaza East (approximately 17,000 square feet). Management believes that the commitment of Time Warner at Trump Plaza East, together with other retail, restaurant and entertainment establishments expected to participate in the Trump Plaza Expansion, evidences the continued growth of, and highlights Trump Plaza's favored place within, the Atlantic City casino market. Trump World's Fair. Upon completion of the renovation in the second quarter of 1996, Trump World's Fair will be connected to Trump Plaza's main tower by an enclosed walkway overlooking The Boardwalk and will add an additional 500 hotel rooms to Trump Plaza. In addition, Trump World's Fair will be outfitted with approximately 50,000 square feet of casino floor space housing 1,493 slot machines and 32 table games. In addition to the casino, Trump World's Fair will feature three restaurants, including a state-of-the-art buffet, a cocktail lounge, convention, ballroom and meeting room space, a swimming pool and a health spa. The enclosed walkway will run through a portion of the Atlantic City Convention Center, which is located between Trump World's Fair and Trump Plaza's main tower. In this connection, Plaza Associates has acquired an easement with regard to portions of the Atlantic City Convention Center. See "--Properties--Trump Plaza--Trump World's Fair" and "Regulatory Matters--New Jersey Gaming Regulations--Approved Hotel Facilities." THE TAJ MAHAL The Taj Mahal currently features Atlantic City's largest casino, with 120,000-square-feet of gaming space, 169 table games and 3,550 slot machines. In addition, the Taj Mahal has a 12,000-square-foot poker, keno and race simulcasting room with 64 poker tables, which was added in 1993 and expanded in 1994. The casino's offerings include blackjack, progressive blackjack, craps, roulette, baccarat, mini baccarat, red dog, sic-bo, pai gow, pai gow poker, Caribbean stud poker, big six, mini big six and let it ride poker. In December 1995, the Taj 68
424B169th Page of 203TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 69th
Mahal opened an Asian themed table game area which offers 16 popular Asian table games catering to the Taj Mahal's growing Asian clientele. In addition, as a special bonus to high-end players, Taj Associates offers three clubs for the exclusive use of select customers: the Maharajah Club for table game players, the President's Club for high-end slot players, and the Bengal Club for other preferred slot players. The Taj Mahal currently consists of a 42-story hotel tower and contiguous low-rise structure, sited on approximately 17 acres of land. The Taj Mahal has 1,250 guest rooms (including 242 suites), 16 dining rooms and 10 beverage locations, parking for approximately 5,200 cars, an 18-bay bus terminal and approximately 65,000-square-feet of ballroom, meeting room and pre-function area space. The Taj Mahal has also signed agreements for the development of the Hard Rock Cafe, Rainforest Cafe and All Star Cafe themed restaurants on the property. In addition, the Taj Mahal features the Taj Entertainment Complex, a 20,000-square-foot multi-purpose entertainment complex known as the Xanadu Theater with seating capacity for approximately 1,200 people, which can be used as a theater, concert hall, boxing arena or exhibition hall, and the Mark Etess Arena, which comprises an approximately 63,000-square foot exhibition hall and entertainment facility. The Xanadu Theater and the Mark Etess Arena have allowed the Taj Mahal to offer longer running, more established productions that cater to the tastes of the Taj Mahal's high-end international guests, and has afforded the Taj Mahal more flexibility in the use of its facilities for sporting and other headline programs. The Taj Mahal regularly engages well-known musicians and entertainment personalities and will continue to emphasize weekend marquee events such as Broadway revues, high visibility sporting events, international festivals and contemporary concerts to maximize casino traffic and to maintain the highest level of glamour and excitement at the Taj Mahal. Management believes that the Taj Mahal's 1,250-room capacity and vast casino, entertainment, convention and exhibition space, including the Mark Etess Arena, make it a highly attractive convention and destination resort facility at which visitors may stay for extended periods. In addition to its normal advertising, Taj Associates actively promotes the Taj Mahal with various local chambers of commerce, travel agencies which specialize in convention travel and various corporate travel departments in order to attract convention business. ATLANTIC CITY MARKET The Atlantic City gaming market has demonstrated continued growth despite the recent proliferation of new gaming venues across the country. The 12 casino hotels in Atlantic City generated approximately $3.75 billion in gaming revenues in 1995, an approximately 9.5% increase over 1994 gaming revenues of approximately $3.42 billion. From 1990 to 1995, total gaming revenues in Atlantic City have increased approximately 27%, while hotel rooms increased approximately 10% during that period. Although total visitor volume to Atlantic City remained relatively constant in 1995, the volume of bus customers dropped to 9.6 million in 1995, continuing a decline from 11.7 million in 1990. The volume of customers traveling by other means to Atlantic City has grown from 20.1 million in 1990 to 23.7 million in 1995. Casino revenue growth in Atlantic City has lagged behind that of other traditional gaming markets, principally Las Vegas, for the last five years. The Company believes that this relatively slower growth is primarily attributable to two key factors. First, there have been no significant additions to hotel capacity in Atlantic City since 1990. Las Vegas visitor volumes have increased, in part, due to the continued addition of new hotel capacity. Both markets have exhibited a strong historical correlation between hotel room inventory and total casino revenues. Secondly, the regulatory environment and infrastructure problems in Atlantic City have made it more difficult and costly to operate. Total regulatory costs and tax levies in New Jersey have exceeded those in Nevada since inception, and there is generally a higher level of regulatory oversight in New Jersey than in Nevada. The infrastructure problems, manifested by impaired accessibility of the casinos, downtown Atlantic City congestion and the condition of the areas surrounding the casinos, have made Atlantic City less attractive to the gaming customer. Total Atlantic City slot revenues increased 12.2% in 1995, continuing a solid trend of increases over the past five years. From 1990 through 1995, slot revenue growth in Atlantic City has averaged 8.3% per year. Total 69
424B170th Page of 203TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 70th
table revenue increased 4.4% in 1995, while table game revenue from 1990 to 1995 has decreased on average 0.7% per year. Management believes the slow growth in table revenue is primarily attributable to two factors. First, the slot product has been significantly improved over the last five years. Dollar bill acceptors, new slot machines, video poker and blackjack and other improvements have increased the popularity of slot play among a wider universe of casino patrons. Casino operators in Atlantic City have added slot machines in favor of table games due to increased public acceptance of slot play and due to slot machines' comparatively higher profitability as a result of lower labor and support costs. Since 1990, the number of slot machines in Atlantic City has increased 37.2%, while the number of table games has decreased by 4.0%. Slot revenues increased from 58% of total casino revenues in 1990 to 69% in 1995. The second reason for historic slow growth in table revenue is that table game players are typically higher end players and are more likely to be interested in overnight stays and other amenities. During peak season and weekends, room availability in Atlantic City is currently inadequate to meet demand, making it difficult for casino operators to aggressively promote table play. Despite generally lower overall growth rates than the Las Vegas market, management believes that Atlantic City possesses similar revenue and cash flow generation capabilities. The approximately $3.75 billion of gaming revenue produced by the 12 casino hotels in Atlantic City in 1995 exceeded the approximately $3.12 billion of gaming revenues produced by the 18 largest (based on net revenues) casino hotels on the Las Vegas Strip for the same period, even though the 12 Atlantic City casino hotels have less than one- quarter the number of hotel rooms of such Las Vegas Strip casino hotels. Win per unit figures in Atlantic City are at a significant premium to Las Vegas win-per-unit performance, primarily due to the constrained supply of gaming positions in Atlantic City compared to Las Vegas. The regulatory environment in Atlantic City has improved recently. Most significantly, 24-hour gaming has been approved, poker and keno have been added and regulatory burdens have been reduced. In particular, Bill A61 was passed in January 1995, which has eliminated duplicative regulatory oversight and channeled operator's funds from regulatory support into CRDA uses. Administrative costs of regulation will be reduced while increasing funds available for new development. In addition to the planned casino expansions, major infrastructure improvements have begun. The CRDA is currently overseeing the development of the "tourist corridor" that will link the new convention center with The Boardwalk and will, when completed, feature an entertainment and retail complex. The tourist corridor is scheduled to be completed in conjunction with the completion of the new convention center. Trump Plaza is adjacent to the existing Atlantic City Convention Center and will also be one of the closest casino hotels to the new convention center, which, as currently planned, would hold approximately 500,000 square feet of exhibit and pre-function space, 45 meeting rooms, food-service facilities and a 1,600-car underground parking garage. The Taj Mahal is approximately 1.5 miles from the site of the new convention center. When completed, the new approximately $250 million convention center would be the largest exhibition space between New York City and Washington, D.C. It will be located at the base of the Atlantic City Expressway and is currently planned to open in January 1997. The State of New Jersey is also implementing an approximately $125 million capital plan to upgrade and expand the Atlantic City International Airport. Management believes that recent gaming regulatory reforms will serve to permit future reductions in operating expenses of casinos in Atlantic City and to increase the funds available for additional infrastructure development through the CRDA. Due principally to an improved regulatory environment, general improvement of economic conditions in 1993, 1994 and 1995 and high occupancy rates, significant investment in the Atlantic City market has been initiated and/or announced. Bally recently bought a Boardwalk lot for $7.5 million, the Sands just completed a major renovation, and in December of 1994, approval by the CRDA was given to TropWorld to add 626 hotel rooms, the Grand to add 295 rooms (both of which are under construction) and the Taj Mahal to add approximately 800 rooms and a 1,500 space parking garage (with an application pending to increase the size to 2,000 spaces). Overall, various casinos in the market have applied to the CRDA for funding to construct 3,400 new hotel rooms. Management believes that these increases in hotel capacity, together with infrastructure improvements, will be instrumental in stimulating future revenue growth in the Atlantic City market. See "--Competition." 70
424B171st Page of 203TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 71st
SEASONALITY The gaming industry in Atlantic City is seasonal, with the heaviest activity at Trump Plaza and at the Taj Mahal during the period from May through September, and with December and January showing substantial decreases in activity. Revenues have been significantly higher on Fridays, Saturdays, Sundays and holidays than on other days. EMPLOYEES AND LABOR RELATIONS TRUMP PLAZA Plaza Associates has approximately 3,700 employees of whom approximately 1,100 are covered by collective bargaining agreements. Management believes that its relationships with its employees are satisfactory. Certain of Plaza Associates' employees must be licensed under the Casino Control Act. See "Regulatory Matters--New Jersey Gaming Regulations--Qualification of Employees." Plaza Funding has no employees. In April 1993, the National Labor Relations Board (the "NLRB") found that Plaza Associates had violated the National Labor Relations Act (the "NLRA") in the context of a union organizing campaign by table game dealers of Plaza Associates in association with the Sports Arena and Casino Employees Union Local 137, a/w Laborers' International Union of North America, AFL-CIO ("Local 137"). In connection with such finding, Plaza Associates was ordered to refrain from interfering with, restraining or coercing employees in the exercise of the rights guaranteed them by Section 7 of the NLRA, to notify its employees of such rights and to hold an election by secret ballot among its employees regarding whether they desire to be represented for collective bargaining by Local 137. The election was held on May 20 and 21, 1994 and the vote, which has been certified by the NLRB, was in favor of management and against representation by Local 137. TAJ MAHAL Taj Associates has approximately 6,100 employees for the operation of the Taj Mahal, of whom approximately 1,850 employees are covered by collective bargaining agreements. Taj Associates believes that its relationships with its employees are satisfactory and that its staffing levels are sufficient to provide superior service. Since opening in April 1990, during which time some collective bargaining agreements with various unions have expired prior to the execution of new agreements, the business of Taj Associates has not been interrupted due to any labor disputes. The collective bargaining agreement with HERE Local 54, which covers substantially all of Taj Associates' hotel and restaurant employees, was renegotiated in September 1994 and will expire on September 14, 1999. Certain Taj Associates' employees must be licensed under the Casino Control Act. See "Regulatory Matters--New Jersey Gaming Regulations--Qualification of Employees." INDIANA RIVERBOAT The Indiana Riverboat is expected to feature an approximately 288-foot luxury yacht containing approximately 37,000 square feet of gaming space with 1,500 slot machines, 73 table games and capacity of approximately 2,450 passengers and 300 employees. The site adjacent to the Indiana Riverboat is anticipated to include surface parking for approximately 3,000 automobiles and certain other infrastructure improvements. The cost to the Company for the development of the Indiana Riverboat, which includes the land, the vessel, gaming equipment, a pavilion for staging and ticketing and restaurant facilities, berthing and support facilities and parking facilities, is expected to be approximately $84 million through the planned opening in the second quarter of 1996. The Company initially anticipated spending $59 million prior to the commencement of the Indiana Riverboat's operations for the vessel, gaming equipment and initial berthing and support facilities, and also anticipated spending an additional $27 million in the second phase to be completed by mid- 1997, which would feature a pavilion for staging and ticketing and restaurant facilities, berthing and support facilities and expanded parking. To facilitate the Indiana Riverboat's operations from the opening day and to avoid disruptive construction at the site for an additional year, the Company determined to accelerate the second phase of the project, now expected to cost $25 million, and complete both phases prior to commencing operations. In addition to the approximately $84 million to be spent through the planned opening, the Company has further committed 71
424B172nd Page of 203TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 72nd
in the licensure process to construct a hotel facility and other amenities (at an approximate cost of $48 million) and to fund approximately $21 million of infrastructure improvements and other municipal uses. Buffington Harbor is approximately 25 miles from downtown Chicago. In addition, the cities of Indianapolis, Fort Wayne, Toledo and Grand Rapids are each within a 175-mile radius of Buffington Harbor. The Company believes the Indiana Riverboat will benefit from (i) its location and size, (ii) its strategy of developing, together with Barden, an array of entertainment, retail and restaurant attractions, and coordinated cruise schedules and (iii) the widespread recognition of the "Trump" name and what management believes to be its reputation for quality. Gaming facilities in Illinois are limited at present to 1,200 gaming positions under current regulations in Illinois, which the Company believes puts Illinois properties at a competitive disadvantage to larger facilities such as the Indiana Riverboat. The Company expects to draw on these competitive advantages and to capitalize on its experience in gaming activities in Atlantic City in order to create an outstanding gaming and entertainment experience. The Company expects to focus its marketing efforts for the Indiana Riverboat on the middle market, which makes up the majority of the gaming population in the Great Lakes Market. The middle market constitutes a broad segment of casino patrons who come to a casino for exciting recreation and entertainment and who typically wager less, on an individual basis, than high-end patrons. Through the use of the "Trump" name and systematic marketing programs, the Company will seek to attract drive-in customers to the facility. Casinos currently operating in the Great Lakes Market have generally been very successful, achieving operating results exceeding those of most new jurisdictional markets in terms of win per unit. The Company believes that these operating results indicate that the Great Lakes Market should be capable of absorbing significant capacity expansion in the future. Under current gaming laws in Indiana, most games typically available in Atlantic City casinos will be permitted on the Indiana Riverboat. The riverboat casinos in Indiana will be permitted to stay open 24 hours per day, 365 days per year and to extend credit and accept credit charge cards, with no loss or wagering limits. Subject to certain exceptions, the Johnson Act prohibits gaming vessels from cruising within federal maritime jurisdiction and prohibits gaming on such vessels. In 1995, the Indiana General Assembly adopted two differing amendments to the Riverboat Gambling Act permitting gambling to be conducted while a riverboat is docked under certain conditions. One of the amendments included an express provision allowing gambling to be conducted while a riverboat is docked if a determination is made that a condition exists that would cause a violation of federal law if the riverboat were to cruise. The other amendment did not include that express provision. The IGC has determined that the two amendments can be harmonized in a way that would permit gambling while a riverboat is docked if cruising would be a violation of federal law. Notwithstanding the IGC's determination, there can be no assurance that commencement of gaming operations by Trump Indiana while the riverboat is cruising would not be challenged as a violation of the Johnson Act or that commencement of gaming operations while the riverboat is docked would not be challenged as a violation of the Johnson Act or Indiana law. See "Risk Factors--The Indiana Riverboat" and "Regulatory Matters-- Indiana Gaming Regulations--Excursions." The Company believes that competition in the gaming industry, particularly the riverboat and dockside gaming industry, is based on the quality and location of gaming facilities, the effectiveness of marketing efforts, and customer service and satisfaction. Although management of the Company believes that the location of the Indiana Riverboat will allow the Company to effectively compete with other casinos in the geographic area surrounding its casino, the Company expects competition in the casino gaming industry to be intense as more casinos are opened and new entrants into the gaming industry become operational. Barden and Trump Indiana are the holders of the certificates of suitability in Buffington Harbor. Barden is an entity beneficially owned by Don H. Barden, a developer based in Detroit without significant prior gaming experience. Pursuant to the BHR Agreement, BHR will own, develop and operate all common land-based and waterside operations in support of Trump Indiana's and Barden's separate riverboat casinos at Buffington Harbor. Trump Indiana and Barden will each be equally responsible for the development and the operating expenses of 72
424B173rd Page of 203TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 73rd
BHR. See "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations--Liquidity and Capital Resources." On June 30, 1995, Trump Indiana acquired, pursuant to the Agreement of Sale (the "Site Sale Agreement") with Lehigh Portland Cement Company ("Lehigh"), dated May 10, 1995, approximately 88 acres of land at Buffington Harbor for $13.5 million (the "Site Purchase Price"). Pursuant to the Harbor Lease Agreement, between Lehigh and BHR, Lehigh granted Trump Indiana and Barden a 30-month lease (which may be extended up to ten years) for the initial use of the harbor and certain of Lehigh's property adjacent to the Buffington Harbor site for the docking of the Indiana Riverboat vessel and the Barden vessel. Under the Harbor Lease Agreement, after Trump Indiana receives permits from applicable regulatory agencies for the construction of its reconfigured harbor site, the initial term of 30 months will be extended for the period of time necessary for Trump Indiana to complete construction of a reconfigured harbor site (as determined by Lehigh's coastal engineer consultant). Trump Indiana expects to fund such construction with cash from operations. If Trump Indiana has not obtained the necessary permits within the initial term of 30 months, after diligently seeking such permits, the term of the Harbor Lease Agreement will be automatically extended to December 31, 2005. No lease payments will be made to Lehigh during the first 30 months of the lease. In the event that the use of this property continues beyond the 30-month period, Lehigh will be entitled to receive a license fee in an amount equal to $125,000 per month for each month either Trump Indiana or Barden uses Lehigh's property during the remaining term of the lease. In 1994, the City of Gary (the "City") commenced a legal proceeding in Lake County Superior Court of Indiana captioned City Of Gary v. Lehigh Portland Cement Company, et al., in which the City sought to exercise its eminent domain power to acquire certain of Lehigh's property, including the Buffington Harbor site, for the purpose of using the land as a gaming venture. On May 12, 1995, the court ruled in favor of the City. Consummation of the condemnation process is subject to additional conditions. However, on May 27, 1995, the Company entered into a Memorandum of Understanding (the "MOU") with the City pursuant to which the City agreed to take all necessary steps to dismiss the condemnation suit following the closing of the Site Sale Agreement. This proceeding was dismissed with prejudice in July 1995. The Company and Trump Indiana further agreed, among other things, to (i) pay to the City $205,000 as reimbursement for certain costs and expenses incurred by the City, and pay certain additional costs and expenses to be incurred by the City in connection with the dismissal of its condemnation suit; (ii) use best efforts to negotiate and complete by June 20, 1995 a long-term ground lease pursuant to which the City would lease the Buffington Harbor Site to Trump Indiana for a period of 99 years with rent at $1.00 per year (the "Buffington Harbor Lease"); (iii) transfer title to the Buffington Harbor Site to the City in consideration of $1.00 upon closing the Site Sale Agreement, provided the Buffington Harbor Lease is then effective; (iv) use best efforts to negotiate and complete by July 25, 1995 a development agreement with the City in order to confirm Trump Indiana's undertakings to the City pursuant to its certificate of suitability; and (v) commence construction at the Buffington Harbor site by the later of June 30, 1995 or such date on which all permits and approvals necessary for the development and operation of the Buffington Harbor site have been obtained, and use best efforts to commence gaming operations within ninety (90) days of commencement of construction. On September 29, 1995, Trump Indiana, Barden and the City entered into an agreement modifying the MOU (the "Amended MOU"). The Amended MOU permits Trump Indiana and Barden to retain ownership of the 88-acre parcel at Buffington Harbor to be utilized for their riverboat operations for a payment of $5 million each. To date, the Company and Trump Indiana have complied with the terms of the Amended MOU. As contemplated in the Amended MOU and required by the certificate of suitability, Trump Indiana is negotiating a "Development Agreement" with the City, which will serve to memorialize the commitments made by Trump Indiana to the City during the licensing process. The Development Agreement will replace the Amended MOU and is generally expected to include the principal terms of the Amended MOU, subject to certain updated provisions. Trump Indiana's certificate of suitability indicates as a condition to the issuance of a riverboat owner's license, that among other things, Trump Indiana enter into a Development Agreement with the City. In addition, Trump Indiana anticipates that the final Development Agreement will include provisions regarding The Trump Foundation, a private foundation established by Trump Indiana for charitable purposes primarily within the City and Lake County, Indiana. The Development Agreement would require Trump Indiana 73
424B174th Page of 203TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 74th
and the City to enter into a separate agreement which would, among other things, require Trump Indiana to contribute to The Trump Foundation $50,000 on or before July 15, 1996, $950,000 on or before December 31, 1996 and $100,000 on or before the end of each calender year thereafter, and to cause The Trump Foundation, as one of its charitable purposes, to grant $5,000 college scholarships annually to ten seniors graduating from Gary public high schools and Performing Arts School. On December 9, 1994, the IGC issued to Trump Indiana a certificate of suitability for a riverboat owner's license for a riverboat to be docked in Buffington Harbor, Indiana. The certificate of suitability constitutes approval of the application of Trump Indiana for a riverboat owner's license. In January 1996, the IGC extended Trump Indiana's certificate of suitability until June 28, 1996. Pursuant to the terms of the certificate of suitability, during such period, Trump Indiana must comply with certain statutory and other requirements imposed by the IGC. In addition, as a condition to the certificate of suitability, Trump Indiana has committed to invest $153 million in the Indiana Riverboat and certain related projects and certain economic development projects and to pay to the City 1% of adjusted gross receipts ("AGR") to be used by the City for security and public safety purposes, and an additional fee, subject to IGC approval, of 3% of AGR. Failure to comply with the foregoing conditions or the other conditions contained in the certificate of suitability and/or failure to commence riverboat excursions by such time as required by the IGC could result in the revocation of the certificate of suitability or the denial of a riverboat owner's license. There can be no assurance that the Company and/or Trump Indiana will be able to comply with the terms of the certificate of suitability, that it will be further extended if operations do not commence by June 28, 1996 or that a riverboat owner's license will ultimately be granted. The riverboat owner's license will only be issued upon satisfaction of the conditions of the certificate of suitability and the requirements of the gaming laws, which include, among other things, the completion of the Indiana Riverboat, acquisition of necessary permits or approvals from federal, state and local authorities, readiness to commence operations and the execution of a Joint Development Agreement with the City. See "Regulatory Matters--Indiana Gaming Regulations--Interim Compliance Requirements." If granted, such license would be for an initial term of five years and renewable annually thereafter. The Company anticipates that its riverboat owner's license (which would supersede the certificate of suitability) would impose substantially similar conditions on the operations of the Indiana Riverboat, although no assurances may be made. With respect to certain land-based facilities, the Company would also be dependent on the ability of Barden to obtain the requisite licenses and fund its portion of joint construction costs. Commencing in early 1994, Trump Indiana (which was then wholly owned by Trump), through its Indiana counsel, had discussions with eight Indiana residents regarding the potential purchase by such residents of non-voting stock of Trump Indiana, representing a total of 7.5% of the equity in Trump Indiana. The purchase price of the stock was to have been paid with a promissory note secured by the stock purchased, although the purchase price and other material terms of the proposed purchase were never agreed upon. Such discussions did not result in an agreement for or the purchase of any stock by the residents. It was subsequently determined to include Trump Indiana as a wholly owned subsidiary of THCR Holdings in connection with the June 1995 Offerings. The residents have since asserted a right to purchase stock in Trump Indiana. Trump Indiana and the Company do not agree that these individuals have any rights with respect to the stock of Trump Indiana or otherwise, and have so advised the residents. Although discussions had been ongoing with respect to the resolution of this matter, on March 29, 1996, the Indiana residents filed a lawsuit against Trump, the Company, THCR Holdings and Trump Indiana with respect to this matter. See "--Litigation--Trump Indiana." Trump Indiana has entered into a Sales and Construction Agreement with Atlantic Marine, Inc. ("AMI") for the purchase and construction of the Indiana Riverboat vessel (the "Construction Agreement") for $24 million (the "Vessel Contract Price"). Pursuant to the Construction Agreement, to date Trump Indiana has paid $21.6 million ($15.1 million provided by the vessel financing) of the Vessel Contract Price to AMI. The vessel will remain the property of AMI until the Vessel Contract Price is paid in full. All risk of damage to or destruction of the vessel and all liability to or for labor employed during its construction will be the responsibility 74
424B175th Page of 203TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 75th
of AMI. Pursuant to the Construction Agreement, AMI will not be responsible for (i) any negligent construction or defects in the vessel after nine months from the date of acceptance of the vessel by Trump Indiana upon completion of the construction or (ii) any incidental or consequential damages. Development of the Indiana Riverboat project will require the Company to (a) acquire rights to traverse, use and/or improve certain parcels of property owned by third parties, in order to gain direct, construction and emergency access to the property, and (b) acquire access to water, sewer, gas, electric and other necessary utility services which presently cannot provide service to the site and which may require extension of existing utility service facilities across existing rights of way and other property owned by third parties. There can be no assurance that the Company will obtain the rights, utility services, licenses, permits and approvals necessary to undertake or complete its development plans, or that such rights, utility services, licenses, permits and approvals will be obtained within the anticipated time frame. Before the Indiana Riverboat becomes operational, additional definitive agreements must be negotiated and executed, gaming facilities must be constructed and a number of further conditions must be satisfied (including the licensing of the Company, Barden and their respective employees and the receipt of all requisite permits). There can be no assurance that the Indiana Riverboat will become operational. See "--Indiana Riverboat," "--Competition," "Risk Factors--The Indiana Riverboat" and "Regulatory Matters--Indiana Gaming Regulations." The Company believes that competition in the gaming industry, particularly the riverboat and dockside gaming industry, is based on the quality and location of gaming facilities, the effectiveness of marketing efforts, and customer service and satisfaction. Although management of the Company believes that the location of the Indiana Riverboat will allow the Company to compete effectively with other casinos in the geographic area surrounding its casino, the Company expects competition in the casino gaming industry to be intense as more casinos are opened and new entrants into the gaming industry become operational. See "--Competition." The Company has no operating history in Indiana and is unable to predict seasonality with respect to the Indiana Riverboat. PROPERTIES THE COMPANY Trump Tower. The Company has entered into a ten year lease with The Trump- Equitable Fifth Avenue Company, a corporation wholly owned by Trump, dated as of July 1, 1995, for the lease of office space in The Trump Tower in New York City, which the Company may use for its general, executive and administrative offices. The fixed rent is $115,500 per year, paid in equal monthly installments, for the period from July 1, 1995 to June 30, 2000 and will be $129,250 per year, paid in equal monthly installments, for the period from July 1, 2000 to June 30, 2005. In addition, the Company will pay as additional rent, among other things, a portion of the property taxes due each year. The Company has the option to terminate this lease upon ninety days' written notice and payment of $32,312.50. TRUMP PLAZA Plaza Associates owns and leases several parcels of land in and around Atlantic City, New Jersey, each of which is used in connection with the operation of Trump Plaza and each of which is currently subject to the liens of the mortgages associated with the Plaza Notes (collectively, the "Plaza Mortgages") and certain other liens. Upon consummation of the Merger Transaction, these parcels of land will secure the Mortgage Notes. Upon its acquisition, Trump Plaza East would also become subject to the mortgage securing the Mortgage Notes. Plaza Casino Parcel. Trump Plaza's main tower is located on The Boardwalk in Atlantic City, New Jersey, next to the existing Atlantic City Convention Center. It occupies the entire city block (approximately 2.38 acres) bounded by The Boardwalk, Mississippi Avenue, Pacific Avenue and Columbia Place (the "Plaza Casino Parcel"). The Plaza Casino Parcel consists of four tracts of land, one of which is owned by Plaza Associates and three of which are leased to Plaza Associates pursuant to three non-renewable ground leases, each of which 75
424B176th Page of 203TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 76th
expires on December 31, 2078 (each, a "Plaza Ground Lease"). Trump Seashore Associates ("Trump Seashore"), Seashore Four Associates ("Seashore Four") and Plaza Hotel Management Company (each, a "Plaza Ground Lessor") are the owners/lessors under such respective Plaza Ground Leases (respectively, the "TSA Lease," "SFA Lease" and "PHMC Lease"; the land which is subject to the Plaza Ground Leases (which includes Additional Parcel 1, as defined) is referred to collectively as the "Plaza Leasehold Tracts" and individually as a "Plaza Leasehold Tract"). Trump Seashore and Seashore Four are 100% beneficially owned by Trump and are, therefore, affiliates of the Company. The Plaza Ground Leases provide that each Plaza Ground Lessor may encumber its fee estate with mortgage liens, but any such fee mortgage will not increase the rent under the applicable Plaza Ground Lease and must be subordinate to such Plaza Ground Lease. Accordingly, any default by a Plaza Ground Lessor under any such fee mortgage will not result in a termination of the applicable Plaza Ground Lease but would permit the fee mortgagee to bring a foreclosure action and succeed to the interests of the Plaza Ground Lessor in the fee estate, subject to Plaza Associates' leasehold estate under such Plaza Ground Lease. Each Plaza Ground Lease also specifically provides that the Plaza Ground Lessor may sell its interest in the applicable Plaza Leasehold Tract, but any such sale would be made subject to Plaza Associates' interest in the applicable Plaza Ground Lease. On August 1, 1991, as security for indebtedness owed to a third party, Trump Seashore transferred its interest in the TSA Lease to United States Trust Company of New York ("UST"), as trustee for the benefit of such third party creditor. The trust agreement among UST, Trump Seashore and such creditor provides that the trust shall terminate on the earlier of (i) August 1, 2012 or (ii) the date on which such third party creditor certifies to UST that all principal, interest and other sums due and owing from Trump Seashore to such third party creditor have been paid. On September 20, 1995, Trump Seashore and its third party lender entered into a mortgage note modification and extension agreement, pursuant to which Trump Seashore and such third party lender extended the term of the indebtedness described above, which matured in October 1993, to September 30, 1996, and increased the interest rate to be paid on such indebtedness to one and one-half percent in excess of the interest rate stated by such third party lender to be its prime rate. The SFA Lease, the TSA Lease and the PHMC Lease each contain options pursuant to which Plaza Associates may purchase the Plaza Leasehold Tract covered by such Plaza Ground Lease at certain times during the term of such Plaza Ground Lease under certain circumstances. The purchase price pursuant to each option is specified in the SFA Lease, the TSA Lease and the PHMC Lease, respectively. The Plaza Ground Leases are "net leases" pursuant to which Plaza Associates, in addition to the payment of fixed rent, is responsible for all costs and expenses with respect to the use, operation and ownership of the Plaza Leasehold Tracts and the improvements now, or which may in the future be, located thereon, including, but not limited to, all maintenance and repair costs, insurance premiums, real estate taxes, assessments and utility charges. The improvements located on the Plaza Leasehold Tracts are owned by Plaza Associates during the terms of the respective Plaza Ground Leases, and upon the expiration of the term of each Plaza Ground Lease (for whatever reason), ownership of such improvements will vest in the Plaza Ground Lessor. If a bankruptcy case is filed by or commenced against a Plaza Ground Lessor under applicable bankruptcy law, the trustee in bankruptcy in a liquidation or reorganization case under the applicable bankruptcy law, or a debtor-in- possession in a reorganization case under the applicable bankruptcy law, has the right, at its option, to assume or reject the Plaza Ground Lease of the debtor-lessor (subject, in each case, to court approval). If the Plaza Ground Lease is assumed, the rights and obligations of Plaza Associates thereunder, and the rights of the trustee with respect to the Plaza Notes (the "Plaza Note Trustee") (and, following the issuance of the Mortgage 76
424B177th Page of 203TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 77th
Notes, the rights of the trustee for the Mortgage Notes (the "Mortgage Note Trustee") as leasehold mortgagee under agreements relating to the issuance of the Plaza Notes (the "Plaza Note Agreements"), would continue in full force and effect). If the Plaza Ground Lease is rejected, Plaza Associates would have the right, at its election, either (i) to treat the Plaza Ground Lease as terminated or (ii) to continue in possession of the land and improvements under the Plaza Ground Lease for the balance of the term thereof and at the rental set forth therein (with a right to offset against such rent any damages caused by the Plaza Ground Lessor's failure to thereafter perform its obligations under such Plaza Ground Lease). Under the Plaza Note Agreements, Plaza Associates assigned to the Plaza Note Trustee its rights to elect whether to treat the Plaza Ground Lease as terminated or to remain in possession of the leased premises if the Plaza Ground Leases are rejected. In connection with the issuance of the Mortgage Notes, the Mortgage will provide that Plaza Associates will assign such rights to the Mortgage Note Trustee. In the case of the Plaza Ground Leases, the rejection of a Plaza Ground Lease by a trustee in bankruptcy or debtor-lessor (as debtor-in-possession) may result in termination of any options to purchase the fee estate of the debtor-lessor and the Plaza Note Trustee's option (as leasehold mortgagee as described above), if the Plaza Ground Lease is terminated, to enter into a new lease directly with the lessor. In addition, under an interpretation of New Jersey law, it is possible that a court would regard such options as separate contracts and, therefore, severable from the Plaza Ground Lease. In such event, the trustee in bankruptcy or debtor-lessor (as debtor-in-possession) could assume the Plaza Ground Lease, while rejecting some or all of such options under the Plaza Ground Lease. Parking Parcels. Plaza Associates owns a parcel of land (the "Plaza Garage Parcel") located across the street from the Plaza Casino Parcel and along Pacific Avenue in a portion of the block bounded by Pacific Avenue, Mississippi Avenue, Atlantic Avenue and Missouri Avenue. Plaza Associates has constructed on the Plaza Garage Parcel a ten-story parking garage capable of accommodating approximately 2,650 cars and which includes offices and a bus transportation center with bays accommodating up to 13 buses at one time. An enclosed pedestrian walkway from the parking garage accesses Trump Plaza at the casino level. Parking at the parking garage is available to Trump Plaza's guests, as well as to the general public. One of the tracts comprising a portion of the Plaza Garage Parcel is subject to a first mortgage on Plaza Associates' fee interest in such tract. As of December 31, 1995, such mortgage secured indebtedness had an approximate outstanding principal balance of $0.1 million. Plaza Associates leases, pursuant to the PHMC Lease, a parcel of land located on the northwest corner of the intersection of Mississippi and Pacific Avenues consisting of approximately 11,800 square feet ("Additional Parcel 1") and owns another parcel on Mississippi Avenue adjacent to Additional Parcel 1 consisting of approximately 5,750 square feet (the "Bordonaro Parcel"). Additional Parcel 1 and the Bordonaro Parcel are presently paved and used for surface parking. Plaza Associates also owns five parcels of land, aggregating approximately 43,300 square feet, and subleases one parcel consisting of approximately 3,125 square feet. All of such parcels are contiguous and are located along Atlantic Avenue, in the same block as the Plaza Garage Parcel. They are used for signage and surface parking and are not encumbered by any mortgage liens other than those of the Plaza Mortgages. Warehouse Parcel. Plaza Associates owns a warehouse and office facility located in Egg Harbor Township, New Jersey, containing approximately 64,000 square feet of space (the "Egg Harbor Parcel"). The Egg Harbor Parcel is encumbered by a first mortgage having an outstanding principal balance, as of December 31, 1995, of approximately $1.5 million and is encumbered by the Plaza Mortgage. Trump Plaza East. In connection with the Merger Transaction, Plaza Associates intends to exercise the Trump Plaza East Purchase Option, a five- year option to purchase the fee and leasehold interests comprising Trump Plaza East. In October 1993, Plaza Associates assumed the leases associated with Trump Plaza East. Until such time as the Trump Plaza East Purchase Option is exercised or expires, Plaza Associates is obligated to pay the net expenses associated with Trump Plaza East. See "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial 77
424B178th Page of 203TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 78th
Condition and Results of Operations--Liquidity and Capital Resources" and "Management--Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation-- Certain Related Party Transactions of Trump--Plaza Associates." During the years ended December 31, 1995 and 1994, Plaza Associates incurred approximately $3.8 million and $4.9 million, respectively, of such expenses. Under the Trump Plaza East Purchase Option, Plaza Associates has the right to acquire the fee interest in Trump Plaza East for a purchase price of $28.0 million through December 31, 1996 increasing by $1.0 million annually thereafter until expiration on June 30, 1998. Plaza Associates currently intends to exercise the Trump Plaza East Purchase Option in connection with the Merger Transaction. However, if Plaza Associates does not exercise the Trump Plaza East Purchase Option in connection with the Merger Transaction, up to $30.0 million of internally generated funds and/or additional financing would be required to fund the acquisition pursuant to the existing purchase option. There can be no assurance that such financing would be available on attractive terms, if at all. In addition, the exercise of the Trump Plaza East Purchase Option may require the consent of certain of Trump's personal creditors, and there can be no assurance that such consent will be obtained at the time Plaza Associates desires to exercise the Trump Plaza East Purchase Option. The CCC has required that Plaza Associates exercise the Trump Plaza East Purchase Option no later than July 1, 1996. Plaza Associates intends to request that the CCC extend the July 1, 1996 deadline for exercising the Trump Plaza East Purchase Option if it is not exercised in connection with the Merger Transaction, although there can be no assurance that such extension would be granted. Failure of the Company to acquire Trump Plaza East, to obtain an extension of the July 1, 1996 deadline or to obtain an extension of the existing lease of the premises beyond its current June 30, 1998 expiration date would have a material adverse effect on the Company. See "Management--Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation-- Certain Related Party Transactions of Trump--Plaza Associates." Plaza Associates has substantially completed its renovation and integration of Trump Plaza East. If Plaza Associates is unable to finance the purchase price of Trump Plaza East pursuant to the Trump Plaza East Purchase Option, any amounts expended with respect to Trump Plaza East, including payments under the Trump Plaza East Purchase Option and the lease pursuant to which Plaza Associates leases Trump Plaza East, and any improvements thereon, would inure to the benefit of the owner of Trump Plaza East and not to Plaza Associates and would increase the cost of demolition of any improvements for which Plaza Associates would be liable. As of December 31, 1995, Plaza Associates had capitalized approximately $35.7 million in construction costs related to Trump Plaza East. If the development of Trump Plaza East is not successful, the Company would be required to write off the capitalized construction costs associated with the project. In September 1993, Trump (as predecessor in interest to Plaza Associates under the lease for Trump Plaza East) entered into the Time Warner Sublease with Time Warner pursuant to which Time Warner subleased the entire first floor of retail space for a new Warner Brothers Studio Store which opened in July 1994. The Time Warner Sublease provides for a ten-year term which expires on the last day of the month immediately preceding the tenth anniversary of the commencement date and contains two five-year renewal options exercisable by Time Warner. Time Warner renovated the premises in connection with opening the studio store. Rent under the Time Warner Sublease is currently accruing and will not become due and payable to Plaza Associates until the satisfaction of certain conditions designed to protect Time Warner from the termination of the Time Warner Sublease by reason of the termination of Plaza Associates' leasehold estate in Trump Plaza East or the foreclosure of a certain mortgage (prior to the exercise of the Trump Plaza East Purchase Option) and until Time Warner's unamortized construction costs are less than accrued rent. No assurances can be made that such conditions will be satisfied. In addition, Time Warner may terminate the Time Warner Sublease at any time after July 1996 in the event that gross sales for the store do not meet certain threshold amounts or at any time if Plaza Associates fails to operate a first-class hotel on Trump Plaza East. See "Management--Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation--Certain Related Party Transactions of Trump--Plaza Associates." Trump World's Fair. Pursuant to the Trump World's Fair Purchase Option, on June 12, 1995, Plaza Associates acquired title to Trump World's Fair. See "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations--Plaza Associates--Liquidity and Capital Resources." Pursuant to an 78
424B179th Page of 203TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 79th
easement agreement with The New Jersey Sports and Exposition Authority ("NJSEA"), Plaza Associates has an exclusive easement over, in and through the portions of the Atlantic City Convention Center to be used as the pedestrian walkway connecting the Trump Plaza's main tower and Trump World's Fair. The easement is for a 25-year term and may be renewed at the option of Plaza Associates for one additional 25-year period. In consideration of the granting of the easement, Plaza Associates must pay to NJSEA the sum of $2,000,000 annually, such annual payment to be adjusted every five years to reflect changes in the consumer price index. Plaza Associates will have the right to terminate the easement agreement at any time upon six months' notice to NJSEA in consideration of a termination payment of $1,000,000. See also "Management--Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation-- Certain Related Party Transactions of Trump--Plaza Associates" and "Regulatory Matters--New Jersey Gaming Regulations--Approved Hotel Facilities." Superior Mortgages. The liens securing the indebtedness on the Plaza Garage Parcel and the Egg Harbor Parcel (all of such liens are collectively called the "Existing Senior Plaza Mortgages") are all senior to the liens of the Plaza Mortgages and will be senior to the liens of mortgages associated with the Mortgage Notes. The principal amount currently secured by such Existing Senior Plaza Mortgages as of December 31, 1995 was, in the aggregate, approximately $3.0 million. Plaza Associates has financed or leased and from time to time will finance or lease its acquisition of furniture, fixtures and equipment. The lien in favor of any such lender or lessor may be senior to the liens of the mortgages associated with the Mortgage Notes. TAJ MAHAL Taj Associates owns and leases several parcels of land in Atlantic City, New Jersey, each of which is used in connection with the operation of the Taj Mahal and each of which is encumbered by the amended mortgage securing the Taj Bonds and the mortgage securing the Working Capital Facility. Upon consummation of the Merger Transaction, these parcels of land will secure the Mortgage Notes and could secure any replacement of the Working Capital Facility as well as certain expansion debt that Trump AC and its subsidiaries are permitted to incur. All of the following properties (other than certain property underlying the casino parcel and the facilities, which are owned by Taj Associates and the office space leased in The Trump Tower) comprise the Specified Parcels. The Casino Parcel. The land comprising the site upon which the Taj Mahal is located consists of approximately 17 acres, which are bounded by The Boardwalk to the south, Maryland Avenue to the east, Pennsylvania Avenue to the west and which extends to the north towards Pacific Avenue for approximately three- quarters of a city block on the western portion of the site and two-thirds of a city block on the eastern portion of the site. Construction was substantially completed and the Taj Mahal was opened to the public on April 2, 1990. Taj Entertainment Complex. The Taj Entertainment Complex is situated on a parcel of land leased from Realty Corp. and features a 20,000-square-foot multi-purpose entertainment complex known as the Xanadu Theater with seating capacity for approximately 1,200 people, which can be used as a theater, concert hall, boxing arena or exhibition hall. In connection with of the Merger Transaction, Taj Associates will purchase the Taj Entertainment Complex. Steel Pier. Taj Associates leases the Steel Pier from Realty Corp. In connection with the Merger Transaction, Taj Associates will purchase the Steel Pier. A condition imposed on Taj Associates' CAFRA Permit (which, in turn, is a condition of Taj Associates' casino license) initially required that Taj Associates begin construction of certain improvements on the Steel Pier by October 1992, which improvements were to be completed within 18 months of commencement. Taj Associates initially proposed a concept to improve the Steel Pier, the estimated cost of which improvements was $30 million. Such concept was approved by the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection ("NJDEP"), the agency which administers CAFRA. In March 1993, Taj Associates obtained a modification of its CAFRA permit providing for the extension of the required commencement and completion dates of the improvements to the Steel Pier for one year based upon an interim use of the Steel Pier for an amusement park. Taj Associates received additional one-year extensions, most 79
424B180th Page of 203TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 80th
recently through March 1997, of the required commencement and completion dates of the improvements of the Steel Pier based upon the same interim use of the Steel Pier for an amusement park pursuant to a sublease ("Pier Sublease") with an amusement park operator ("Pier Subtenant"). The Pier Sublease provides for a five-year lease term through December 31, 1999. However, Taj Associates may terminate the Pier Sublease after December 31 of each year if written notice of termination is given to the Pier Subtenant on or before September 1 of such year. Office and Warehouse Space. Taj Associates owns an office building located on South Pennsylvania Avenue adjacent to the Taj Mahal. In addition, Taj Associates, in April 1991, purchased for approximately $1.7 million certain facilities of TCA which are presently leased to commercial tenants and used for office space and vehicle maintenance facilities. Taj Associates currently leases from Realty Corp a warehouse complex of approximately 34,500 square feet. As a part of the Specified Parcels purchase in connection with the Merger Transaction, Taj Associates will purchase such warehouse. Taj Associates has entered into a lease with The Trump-Equitable Fifth Avenue Co., a corporation wholly owned by Trump, for the lease of office space in The Trump Tower in New York City, which Taj Associates uses as a marketing office. The monthly payments under the lease had been $1,000, and the premises were leased at such rent for four months in 1992, the full twelve months in 1993 and 1994 and eight months in 1995. On September 1, 1995, the lease was renewed for a term of five years with an option for Taj Associates to cancel the lease on September 1 of each year, upon six months' notice and payment of six months' rent. Under the renewed lease, the monthly payments are $2,184. Parking. The Taj Mahal provides parking for approximately 5,200 cars of which 4,600 spaces are located in indoor parking garages and 600 spaces are located on land leased to Taj Associates by Realty Corp. In addition, Taj Associates entered into a lease agreement with TCA to share its employee parking facilities. In connection with the Taj Mahal Expansion, Taj Associates will expand its self-parking facilities by 2,000 spaces. Themed Restaurants. Hard Rock Cafe International (N.J.), Inc. ("Hard Rock") has entered into a fifteen-year lease (the "Hard Rock Cafe Lease") with Taj Associates for the lease of space at the Taj Mahal for a Hard Rock Cafe. The basic rent under the Hard Rock Cafe Lease is $750,000 per year, paid in equal monthly installments, for the first 10 years of the lease term, and will be $825,000 per year, paid in equal monthly installments, for the remaining 5 years of the lease term. In addition, Hard Rock will pay percentage rent in an amount equal to 10% of Hard Rock's annual gross sales in excess of $10 million. Hard Rock has the right to terminate the Hard Rock Cafe Lease on the tenth anniversary thereof and also has the option to extend the term of the lease for an additional five year period at an annual basic rental of $907,500 during such renewal term. Rainforest Cafe, Inc.-Atlantic City ("Rainforest") has entered into a ten- year lease (the "Rainforest Cafe Lease") with Taj Associates for the lease of space at the Taj Mahal for a Rainforest Cafe. The basic rent under the Rainforest Cafe Lease is $2.5 million per year, paid in equal monthly installments. In addition, Rainforest will pay percentage rent in an amount equal to the difference, if any, between (i) 10% of Rainforest's gross sales made during each calendar month during the lease term and (ii) one-twelfth of the annual basic rent. Rainforest has the option to extend the term of the Rainforest Cafe Lease for two successive additional terms of five years each at an annual basic rental of $2.75 million during the first renewal term and an annual basic rental of $3,025,000 during the second renewal term. The Rainforest Cafe Lease will require Taj Associates to contribute $2.5 million toward construction after the project is completed and the restaurant opens for business. All Star Cafe, Inc. ("All Star") has entered into a twenty-year lease (the "All Star Cafe Lease"), with Taj Associates for the lease of space at the Taj Mahal for an All Star Cafe. The basic rent under the All Star Cafe Lease is $1 million per year, paid in equal monthly installments. In addition, All Star will pay percentage rent in an amount equal to the difference, if any, between (i) 8% of All Star's gross sales made during each calendar month during the first lease year, 9% of All Star's gross sales made during each calendar month during the second lease year and 10% of All Star's gross sales made during each calendar month during the third through the twentieth lease years, and (ii) one-twelfth of the annual basic rent. The total minimum annual rental payments payable under these three leases will be $4.25 million. 80
424B181st Page of 203TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 81st
INDIANA RIVERBOAT See "--Indiana Riverboat." TRADEMARK/LICENSING Pursuant to the License Agreement, Trump granted to the Company the world- wide right and license to use the Marks in connection with casino and gaming activities and related services and products. The license is exclusive, subject to existing licenses of the Marks to the Taj Mahal (prior to the Merger Transaction) and Trump's Castle. The License Agreement does not restrict or restrain Trump from the right to use or further license the Trump Names in connection with services and products other than casino services and products. The license is for a term of the later of (i) June 2015; (ii) such time as Trump and his affiliates no longer hold a 15% or greater voting interest in the Company; or (iii) such time as Trump ceases to be employed or retained pursuant to an employment, management, consulting or similar services agreement with the Company. Upon expiration of the term of the license, Trump has agreed to grant the Company a non-exclusive license for a reasonable period of transition on terms to be mutually agreed upon between Trump and the Company. Trump's obligations under the License Agreement are secured by a security agreement, pursuant to which Trump granted the Company a first priority security interest in the Marks for use in connection with casino services, as well as related hotel, bar and restaurant services. See "Risk Factors--Limitations on License of the Trump Name." RESTRUCTURINGS THE 1992 PLAZA RESTRUCTURING In 1991, Trump Plaza experienced liquidity problems. Management believes that those liquidity problems were attributable, in part, to an overall deterioration in the Atlantic City gaming market, as indicated by reduced rates of casino revenue growth for the industry for the two prior years, aggravated by an economic recession in the Northeast. In addition, increased casino gaming capacity in Atlantic City, due in part to the opening of the Taj Mahal in April 1990, may also have contributed to Trump Plaza's liquidity problems. In order to alleviate its liquidity problem, pursuant to the 1992 Plaza Restructuring, Plaza Associates and Plaza Funding restructured their indebtedness through a prepackaged plan of reorganization under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code. The purpose of the 1992 Plaza Restructuring was to improve the amortization schedule and extend the maturity of Plaza Associates' indebtedness by (i) eliminating the sinking fund requirement on Plaza Funding's 12 7/8% Mortgage Bonds, due 1998 (the "Original Plaza Bonds"), (ii) extending the maturity of such indebtedness from 1998 to 2002, (iii) lowering the interest rate from 12 7/8% per annum to 12% per annum, (iv) reducing the aggregate principal amount of the indebtedness under the Original Plaza Bonds and certain other indebtedness from $250 million to $225 million and (v) eliminating certain other indebtedness by reconstituting such debt in part as new bonds (the "Successor Plaza Bonds") and in part as Stock Units (as defined). The 1992 Plaza Restructuring was necessitated by the inability to either generate cash flow or obtain additional financing sufficient to make the scheduled sinking fund payment on the Original Plaza Bonds. In connection with the 1992 Plaza Restructuring, each holder of $1,000 principal amount of Original Plaza Bonds and such other indebtedness received (i) $900 principal amount of Successor Plaza Bonds, (ii) 12 Stock Units, each representing one share of Common Stock and one share of Preferred Stock of Plaza Funding (the "Stock Units") and (iii) cash payments of approximately $58.65, reflecting accrued interest. On May 29, 1992, Plaza Funding, which theretofore had no interest in Plaza Associates, received a 50% beneficial interest in TP/GP, Inc. ("Trump Plaza GP"), and Plaza Funding and Trump Plaza GP were admitted as partners of Plaza Associates. Plaza Funding also issued approximately three million Stock Units to holders of the Original Plaza Bonds and certain other indebtedness. Pursuant to the terms of Plaza Associates' partnership agreement, Plaza Funding was issued a preferred partnership interest, which provided Plaza Funding with 81
424B182nd Page of 203TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 82nd
partnership distributions designed to pay dividends on, and the redemption price of, the Stock Units. Trump Plaza GP became the managing general partner of Plaza Associates, and, through its Board of Directors, managed the affairs of Plaza Associates. Trump Plaza GP was subsequently merged with and into Plaza Funding, which became the managing general partner of Plaza Associates. The Successor Plaza Bonds and the Stock Units were redeemed in 1993 out of the proceeds of a refinancing designed to enhance Trump Plaza's liquidity and to position the Trump Plaza for a subsequent deleveraging transaction. The 1993 refinancing included (i) the sale by Plaza Funding of $330 million in aggregate principal amount of Plaza Notes and (ii) the sale by Trump AC of $60 million aggregate principal amount of PIK Notes and PIK Note Warrants to acquire an aggregate of $12 million in principal amount of additional PIK Notes. Upon consummation of the refinancing, Plaza Funding held a 1% equity interest in Plaza Associates and Plaza Holding held a 99% equity interest. THE 1991 TAJ RESTRUCTURING During 1990 and 1991, Taj Associates experienced liquidity problems. Taj Associates believes that these problems were attributable, in part, to an overall deterioration in the Atlantic City gaming market, as indicated by reduced rates of casino revenue growth for the industry for the two prior years, aggravated by an economic recession in the Northeast and the Persian Gulf War, as well as the risks inherent in the establishment of a new business enterprise. Comparatively, excessive casino gaming capacity in Atlantic City may also have contributed to Taj Associates' liquidity problems. As a result of Taj Associates' liquidity problems, Taj Funding failed to make its November 15, 1990 and May 15, 1991 interest payments on its Old Taj Bonds, resulting in an event of default under the indenture with respect to such Old Taj Bonds. During 1990 and 1991, Taj Associates also failed to pay certain principal and interest installments on certain indebtedness due under its loan with NatWest. In order to alleviate its liquidity problems, during 1991, TTMC, Taj Funding, Taj Associates and TTMI (together, the "Debtors") restructured their indebtedness through the 1991 Taj Restructuring, which was a "prepackaged" plan of reorganization under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code. At the time, the Debtors believed that there was no alternative to their liquidity problems other than filing petitions under the Bankruptcy Code. Taj Associates had been unable to obtain additional financing, and Taj Funding was restricted from amending the payment terms of the Old Taj Bonds outside of a case under the Bankruptcy Code without the unanimous consent of the holders thereof. The purpose of the 1991 Taj Restructuring was to improve the amortization schedule and extend the maturity of Taj Associates' indebtedness by reducing and deferring the Debtors' annual debt service requirements by (i) restructuring Taj Associates' and affiliated entities' long-term indebtedness to NatWest, First Fidelity and Bankers Trust and (ii) issuing the Taj Bonds with an overall lower rate of interest as compared with the Old Taj Bonds. Upon consummation of the 1991 Taj Restructuring on October 4, 1991, Taj Associates issued to the holders of the Old Taj Bonds a general partnership interest representing 49.995% of the equity of Taj Associates. Such holders in turn contributed such partnership interest to Taj Holding. Taj Funding and Taj Holding also issued the Units to the holders of the Old Taj Bonds. As part of the 1991 Taj Restructuring, TM/GP, which has no other assets, received a 49.995% partnership interest in Taj Associates from Taj Holding. Trump also contributed to Taj Holding a 50% ownership interest in TTMC, which owns a .01% interest in Taj Associates, in exchange for the Taj Holding Class C Common Stock, as described below. At the time of these transfers, Taj Holding issued 1,350,000 shares of Taj Holding Class A Common Stock and 729,458 shares of Taj Holding Class B Common Stock to the holders of the Old Taj Bonds and 1,350,000 shares of Taj Holding Class C Common Stock to Trump. In accordance with the terms of the Taj Bond Indenture, a portion of the interest on the Taj Bonds may be paid in additional Taj Bonds. At May 15, 1992, 1993, 1994 and 1995, 8,844 Units comprised of $8,844,000 of Taj Bonds and 8,844 shares of Taj Holding Class B Common Stock, 14,579 Units comprised of $14,579,000 of Taj Bonds and 14,579 shares of Taj Holding Class B Common 82
424B183rd Page of 203TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 83rd
Stock, 12,249 Units comprised of $12,249,000 of Taj Bonds and 12,249 shares of Taj Holding Class B Common Stock and 15,112 Units comprised of $15,112,000 of Taj Bonds and 15,112 shares of Taj Holding Class B Common Stock, respectively, were issued in lieu of the payment of a portion of the cash interest on the outstanding Taj Bonds. CERTAIN INDEBTEDNESS THE COMPANY The Mortgage Notes. Trump AC is issuing in an underwritten offering $1,200,000,000 aggregate principal amount of Mortgage Notes with a maturity of ten years. The Mortgage Notes include restrictive covenants prohibiting or limiting, among other things, the sale of assets, the making of acquisitions and other investments, capital expenditures, the incurrence of additional debt and liens and the payment of dividends and distributions. Non-compliance could result in the acceleration of such indebtedness. In addition, the Mortgage Notes contain a requirement that Trump AC offer to purchase each holder's Mortgage Notes at 101% of the principal amount thereof, together with accrued and unpaid interest to the date of repurchase, upon a "Change of Control." The Mortgage Note Indenture will define a "Change of Control" to include events similar to those constituting a "Change of Control" under the Senior Note Indenture (generally, an acquisition by a person or group of affiliated persons other than Trump of more than a 35% voting interest in the Company, unless Trump owns more than such percentage). The failure by THCR Holdings to maintain 100% beneficial ownership of Trump AC will also constitute a Mortgage Note "Change of Control." Senior Notes. THCR Holdings and THCR Funding (the "THCR Obligors") are the issuers of $155 million principal amount of Senior Notes. The Senior Notes are the joint and several obligations of the THCR Obligors. Interest on the Senior Notes is payable semiannually in arrears. In connection with the Merger Transaction, the THCR Obligors will solicit from the holders of Senior Notes the waiver of, and the consent to modify, certain provisions of the Senior Note Indenture. The Senior Notes mature on June 15, 2005. The Senior Notes are not redeemable prior to June 15, 2000, except pursuant to a Required Regulatory Redemption (as defined in the Senior Note Indenture). Thereafter, the Senior Notes may be redeemed at the option of the THCR Obligors, in whole or in part, at any time on or after June 15, 2000 at the redemption prices set forth in the Senior Note Indenture, together with accrued and unpaid interest to the date of redemption. The obligations of the THCR Obligors under the Senior Note Indenture are secured by (1) an assignment and pledge to the trustee under the Senior Note Indenture (the "Senior Note Trustee") of (a) 99% of the general partnership interests in Plaza Associates, (b) 100% of the capital stock of Plaza Funding (the holder of the remaining 1% general partnership interest in Plaza Associates, which 1% is pledged exclusively for the benefit of the holders of the Plaza Notes until the Plaza Note Purchase, at which time such interest will be pledged for the exclusive benefit of the holders of the Senior Notes), (c) 100% of the general partnership interests in Trump AC, (d) 100% of the capital stock of Plaza Holding Inc., a direct wholly owned subsidiary of THCR Holdings which owns a 1% general partnership interest in Trump AC, (e) 100% of the capital stock of Trump Indiana, (f) 100% of the capital stock of THCR Funding, (g) other equity interests issued from time to time by THCR Holdings or any of its Subsidiaries (as defined in the Senior Note Indenture) and (h) promissory notes issued by THCR Holdings or any of its Subsidiaries, excluding Unrestricted Subsidiaries (as defined in the Senior Note Indenture) from time to time directly owned or acquired by THCR Holdings; (2) certain remaining net proceeds from the June 1995 Offerings; and (3) certain proceeds from time to time received, receivable or otherwise distributed in respect of the assets described in clauses (1) and (2) above (collectively, the "Senior Note Collateral"). The security interests in the Senior Note Collateral are first priority security interests and are exclusive except to the extent required by the Plaza Note Indenture to equally and ratably secure the Plaza Notes (prior to the retirement of the Plaza Notes) with respect to any of the direct or indirect equity interests in Plaza 83
424B184th Page of 203TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 84th
Associates, Plaza Funding, Trump AC and Plaza Holding Inc. (as described below). Any equity interests in Subsidiaries of THCR Holdings which are acquired by THCR Holdings will be assigned and pledged to the Senior Note Trustee and the security interests granted in such equity interests will be exclusive, first priority security interests. PLAZA ASSOCIATES The Plaza Notes, $330 million of which are outstanding, were issued by Plaza Funding, with Plaza Associates providing a full and unconditional guaranty thereof. In connection with the Merger Transaction, the Plaza Notes will be retired. The Plaza Notes mature in 2001 and bear interest semiannually in arrears. The Plaza Notes are subject to redemption at any time on or after June 15, 1998, at the option of Plaza Funding or Plaza Associates, in whole or in part, at the redemption prices set forth in the Plaza Note Indenture. In addition, upon the occurrence of a Plaza Note Change of Control (as defined in the Plaza Note Indenture), each holder of Plaza Notes may require Plaza Funding or Plaza Associates to repurchase such holder's Plaza Notes at 101% of the principal amount thereof, together with accrued and unpaid interest to the date of repurchase. Until the Plaza Note Purchase, Plaza Funding and Plaza Associates' obligations under the Plaza Note Indenture are secured principally by (i) the mortgage encumbering substantially all of Plaza Associates' assets (the "Plaza Note Mortgage") (see "--Properties") and (ii) the pledge by Plaza Funding of its 1% general partnership interest in Plaza Associates and, equally and ratably with the Senior Notes to the extent required by the Plaza Note Indenture, by a pledge of (x) 100% of the general partnership interest in Trump AC, (y) Trump AC's 99% general partnership interest in Plaza Associates and (z) 100% of the capital stock of Plaza Funding and Plaza Holding Inc. (the holder of the remaining 1% of Trump AC) (the "Plaza Note Security"). Following the Plaza Note Purchase in connection with the Merger Transaction, the Plaza Note Security will be released and (i) subject to clause (ii), Plaza Associates' assets, together with Taj Associates' assets, will secure the Mortgage Notes and (ii) the Senior Notes will have an exclusive security interest in 100% of the equity of all of THCR Holdings' direct or indirect Subsidiaries (as defined in the Senior Note Indenture). In addition to the foregoing, Plaza Associates' long-term indebtedness includes approximately $3.0 million of outstanding mortgage notes as of December 31, 1995, described under "--Properties." TAJ ASSOCIATES Taj Bonds. In connection with the 1991 Taj Restructuring, Taj Funding and Taj Holding issued Units, each of which was comprised of $1,000 principal amount of Taj Bonds and one share of Taj Holding Class B Common Stock. Pursuant to the Taj Bond Indenture, Taj Funding may issue up to $860 million of Taj Bonds. On October 4, 1991, at the time the Units were issued, the principal amount of Taj Bonds issued was $729,458,000. As of December 31, 1995, the principal amount of Taj Bonds issued was $780,242,000. The Taj Bonds have a stated maturity date of November 15, 1999. The Taj Bonds bear interest at 11.35% per annum. Interest on the Taj Bonds is due semi-annually on each November 15 and May 15. Interest on the Taj Bonds must be paid in cash on each interest payment date at a rate of 9.375% per annum, and, in addition, effective May 15, 1992, and annually thereafter, an additional amount of interest in cash or additional Taj Bonds or a combination thereof, is payable in an amount to increase the interest paid to 11.35% per annum. The obligations of Taj Funding to pay the principal of, premium, if any, and interest on the Taj Bonds are guaranteed by Taj Associates. The Taj Bonds are secured by an assignment by Taj Funding to the trustee under the Taj Bond Indenture (the "Taj Bond Trustee") of a promissory note, dated as of October 4, 1991, issued by Taj Associates to Taj Funding (the "Taj Bond Partnership Note") in a principal amount of $675 million with payment terms substantially similar to the payment terms of the Taj Bonds, which is in turn secured by an amended mortgage, dated as of October 4, 1991, by Taj Associates as mortgagor and Taj Funding as mortgagee, securing payment of the Taj Bond Partnership Note, as amended to reflect the terms of the Taj Bonds (the "Amended Taj Mortgage"), which has been assigned to the Taj Bond Trustee and encumbers Taj Associates' interest in the Taj Mahal and 84
424B185th Page of 203TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 85th
substantially all of the other assets of Taj Associates, excluding certain furniture, furnishings, fixtures, machinery and equipment which is subject to the lien of the NatWest Loan. In addition, the Taj Bond Partnership Note is secured by a second, subordinated lien on all the real estate owned by Realty Corp. Moreover, Taj Associates has acquired an option to purchase the real estate owned by Realty Corp., and such option has been assigned to the Taj Bond Trustee as security for the Taj Bonds. The principal and accrued and unpaid interest on the outstanding Taj Bonds will be paid in full in connection with the Merger Transaction. Concurrently with the retirement of the Taj Bonds, the outstanding shares of Taj Holding Class B Common Stock will be redeemed in accordance with their terms, at a redemption price of $.50 per share. NatWest Loan. On November 3, 1989, Taj Associates entered into the NatWest Loan, which provided financing of $50 million for certain items of furniture, fixtures and equipment installed in the Taj Mahal. On October 4, 1991, in connection with the 1991 Taj Restructuring, the NatWest Loan was amended in order to, among other things, modify the interest rate and other payment terms. As of December 31, 1995, the outstanding principal amount outstanding under the NatWest Loan was $44,944,000, and the interest rate was 9.375% per annum. Principal and interest on the NatWest Loan are payable as follows: (i) on the last business day of each month until the earlier of the last business day of October 1999 or the date the NatWest Loan, together with all interest thereon, is paid in full, the sum of $416,667, to be applied first in respect of accrued interest on the NatWest Loan and thereafter, to the extent available, in reduction of the principal of the NatWest Loan; provided, however, up to $525,000 of such payments received by NatWest in any year shall be paid to either First Fidelity or Bankers Trust for application by First Fidelity in payment of obligations of Taj Associates to First Fidelity, and by Bankers Trust on behalf of Taj Associates on behalf of TTMI in payment of interest on the TTMI Note. Such amounts paid by NatWest shall not have been applied by NatWest in payment of the principal of, interest on or any other sums due in respect of the NatWest Loan or otherwise payable to NatWest; (ii) on May 15 of each year (if any of the principal of or interest on the NatWest Loan is then outstanding), commencing on May 15, 1992 to and including May 15, 1999, an amount (the "EACF Payment") equal to 16.5% (or, if the First Fidelity Loan shall have been paid in full on or prior to any such May 15, 20%) of Excess Available Cash Flow (as defined in the Taj Bond Indenture) for the preceding calendar year in excess of the Additional Amount (as defined in the Taj Bond Indenture) payable on such May 15 (such remaining Excess Available Cash Flow, the "Remaining EACF Amount"), if any, to be applied first in reduction of then accrued but unpaid interest on and then to principal of the NatWest Loan; and (iii) on November 15, 1999 the outstanding principal of and all accrued but unpaid interest on the NatWest Loan. The NatWest Loan is secured by a first priority lien on the furniture, fixtures and equipment acquired with the proceeds of the NatWest Loan plus any after-acquired furniture, fixtures and equipment that replaces such property, or of the same type; provided, however, that the NatWest Loan may be subordinated to a lien to secure purchase money financing of such after- acquired property which does not exceed 50% of the purchase price of such after-acquired property. Upon the occurrence of an event of default under the NatWest Loan, including, without limitation, the sale of any real estate by Realty Corp. for less than the release price set forth in the First Fidelity Loan (as defined below) without the prior written consent of NatWest, NatWest may accelerate any and all indebtedness outstanding under the NatWest Loan. Taj Associates will satisfy the NatWest Loan in connection with the Merger Transaction. 85
424B186th Page of 203TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 86th
First Fidelity Loan/Specified Parcels. On November 22, 1988, First Fidelity, Realty Corp. and Trump, as guarantor, entered into the First Fidelity Loan in the aggregate principal amount of $75,000,000. Pursuant to an amendment to the First Fidelity Loan, effective as of October 4, 1991, the rate of interest payable was modified, the dates of payment of principal and interest were deferred and accrued interest in the amount of $1,773,750 was capitalized. As of December 31, 1995, the principal amount outstanding on the First Fidelity Loan was approximately $78 million. Unpaid principal and accrued interest on the First Fidelity Loan is due and payable on November 15, 1999, unless otherwise extended in connection with the extension of the maturity of the Taj Bonds. Taj Associates currently leases the Specified Parcels from Realty Corp., a corporation wholly owned by Trump, pursuant to an Amended and Restated Lease Agreement, dated as of October 4, 1991 (the "Specified Parcels Lease"). Pursuant to the Specified Parcels Lease, Taj Associates is obligated to pay Realty Corp. $3.3 million plus 3.5% of the Remaining EACF Amount per year. Such annual payment, however, is reduced by (i) all of the Base Fees (as defined therein) and the first $75,000 of the Incentive Fees (as defined therein) payable to Trump pursuant to the Taj Services Agreement which are each assigned by Trump to First Fidelity (which amounts were $575,000 in 1995) and (ii) the portion of monies payable by Taj Associates to NatWest to be remitted to First Fidelity (which amounts were $525,000 in 1995). The Specified Parcels Lease expires on December 31, 2023; however, the lease may be terminated prior to such date following a foreclosure or similar proceeding on the Specified Parcels by First Fidelity, the holder of a first mortgage lien on the Specified Parcels which secures the First Fidelity Loan (the "First Fidelity Mortgage") or any other mortgagee thereof. The Specified Parcels Lease provides that, upon payment of the First Fidelity Loan, and upon discharge of the First Fidelity Mortgage, Taj Associates may purchase the Specified Parcels for ten dollars. Payment of the First Fidelity Loan is guaranteed by a guarantee (limited to any deficiency in the amount owed under the First Fidelity Loan when due, up to a maximum of $30 million) by Taj Associates (the "Taj Associates-First Fidelity Guarantee"), a personal guarantee by Trump (pursuant to which First Fidelity has agreed to forbear from asserting any personal claim with respect thereto in excess of approximately $19.2 million) (the "Trump-First Fidelity Guarantee") and limited recourse guarantees by TTMC (the "TTMC-First Fidelity Guarantee") and TTMI (as amended, the "TTMI-First Fidelity Guarantee" and, together with the Trump-First Fidelity Guarantee and the TTMC-First Fidelity Guarantee, the "Other First Fidelity Guarantees"). The Other First Fidelity Guarantees are secured by pledges by Trump of 62.5% of his Taj Holding Class C Common Stock, TTMC's Common Stock and TTMI's Common Stock and all of his shares of Realty Corp.'s Common Stock, and pledges by TTMI and TTMC of 62.5% and 31.25%, respectively, of their equity and financial interests as general partners in Taj Associates (all such interests pledged to First Fidelity as security for the Other First Fidelity Guarantees are referred to herein as the "Other First Fidelity Guarantee Collateral"). First Fidelity's recourse under the TTMC- First Fidelity Guarantee and the TTMI-First Fidelity Guarantee is limited to the collateral pledged by TTMC and TTMI, respectively. Upon the satisfaction in full of the obligations due under the First Fidelity Loan at a negotiated amount of $50 million and 500,000 shares of Common Stock, Taj Associates will purchase the Specified Parcels from Realty Corp. In connection therewith, First Fidelity will (i) release and discharge Realty Corp. from the First Fidelity Loan and release its lien on the Specified Parcels, (ii) release Taj Associates from the Taj Associates-First Fidelity Guarantee, (iii) release each of Trump, TTMC and TTMI from their respective obligations under the Other First Fidelity Guarantees and (iv) release its lien on the Other First Fidelity Guarantee Collateral. In addition, the purchase of the Specified Parcels will eliminate Taj Associates' current obligations under the Specified Parcels Lease and the termination rights with respect to the Specified Parcels Lease, thereby facilitating the Taj Mahal Expansion by securing the future use of the Specified Parcels by Taj Associates. The holders of the Mortgage Notes will have a first priority security interest in the Specified Parcels. TTMI Note. On April 30, 1990, Trump loaned $25 million to Taj Associates on an unsecured basis, in exchange for a note payable to Trump (the "Old Taj Associates Note"). The Old Taj Associates Note was pledged to certain lenders of Trump, including Bankers Trust, as security for certain of Trump's personal 86
424B187th Page of 203TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 87th
indebtedness. On October 4, 1991, in connection with the 1991 Taj Restructuring and in order to facilitate the reorganization of Taj Associates and certain of its affiliates, the Old Taj Associates Note was canceled and, in lieu thereof, TTMI, a corporation wholly owned by Trump which was formed for the purpose of holding a general partnership interest in Taj Associates, executed the TTMI Note, a promissory note payable to Trump in the principal amount of $27,188,000. At such time, in order to secure the Trump Indebtedness, Trump pledged to certain lenders, including Bankers Trust, his right, title and interest in the TTMI Note. As additional security for the Trump Indebtedness, Trump pledged to Bankers Trust and certain other lenders all of his shares of Taj Holding Class C Common Stock, TTMC's Common Stock and TTMI's Common Stock, which pledges are subordinate, in part, to the liens of First Fidelity in such collateral. In addition, TTMI and TTMC have each guaranteed the repayment of the Trump Indebtedness, which limited recourse guarantees are secured by pledges by TTMI and TTMC to Bankers Trust and certain other lenders of 100% and 50%, respectively, of their equity and financial interests as general partners in Taj Associates, which pledges are subordinate, in part, to the liens of First Fidelity in such collateral. In connection with the Merger Transaction, Bankers Trust will receive $10 million from Taj Associates in respect of certain of the Trump Indebtedness. Upon such payment, Bankers Trust will release (i) its lien on the TTMI Note, (ii) its liens on the remaining collateral pledged by Trump to Bankers Trust and (iii) TTMI and TTMC from their respective obligations as guarantors of certain of Trump's personal indebtedness and the liens securing such obligations. See "Underwriting." All other liens in respect of the foregoing in favor of other lenders holding a portion of the Trump Indebtedness will be released at such time. Working Capital Facility. On November 14, 1991, Taj Associates entered into the Working Capital Facility with Foothill Capital Corporation ("Foothill") in the amount of $25 million, which is secured by a lien on Taj Associates' assets senior to the lien of the Taj Bond Mortgage securing the Taj Bonds. On September 1, 1994, Taj Associates and Foothill extended the maturity of the Working Capital Facility to November 13, 1999, in consideration of modifications of the terms thereof. Borrowings under the Working Capital Facility bear interest at a rate equal to the prime lending rate plus 3%, with a minimum of 0.666% per month. The agreement further provides for a .75% annual fee and a .50% unused line fee. As of December 31, 1995, no amounts were outstanding under the Working Capital Facility. The occurrence of any of the following events constitutes an event of default under the Working Capital Facility: (i) failure to pay principal, interest, fees, charges or reimbursements due to Foothill, when due and payable or when declared due and payable; (ii) failure or neglect to perform certain duties and covenants under the agreement; (iii) any material portion of Taj Associates' assets is attached, seized, subjected to a writ or distress warrant, levied upon, or comes into the possession of any judicial officer or assignee and such attachment or writ is not dismissed within 60 days; (iv) an insolvency proceeding is commenced by Taj Associates; (v) an insolvency proceeding is commenced against Taj Associates, and is not dismissed within 60 days; (vi) Taj Associates is enjoined, restrained, or in any way prevented by certain governmental agencies from continuing to conduct all or any material part of its business affairs; (vii) Taj Associates fails to pay certain liens, levies or assessments on the payment date thereof; (viii) certain judgments or claims in excess of $500,000 become a lien or encumbrance upon a material portion of Taj Associates' assets; (ix) Taj Associates defaults in payments owing to NatWest or the Taj Bond Trustee; (x) Taj Associates makes unauthorized payments on debt subordinated to the Working Capital Facility; (xi) misrepresentations are made by Taj Associates to Foothill in any warranty, representation, certificate or report; (xii) certain ERISA violations occur which could have a material adverse effect on the financial condition of Taj Associates; or (xiii) Taj Associates incurs or enters into a commitment to incur any indebtedness which is secured by Taj Associates assets subject to the Working Capital Facility. Upon the occurrence of an event of default, Foothill may, at its election, without notice of its election and without demand, do any one or more of the following: (i) declare all obligations immediately due and payable; (ii) cease advancing money or extending credit; (iii) terminate the Working Capital Facility without affecting Foothill's rights and security interest in Taj Associates' assets; (iv) settle disputes and claims directly with certain Taj Associates' debtors; (v) make such payments and perform such acts as Foothill deems necessary to protect 87
424B188th Page of 203TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 88th
its security interests; (vi) set off amounts owed under the Working Capital Facility by other Taj Associates' accounts or deposits held by Foothill; (vii) prepare for sale and sell, after giving proper notice, Taj Associates' assets securing the Working Capital Facility in a commercially reasonable manner; (viii) exercise its rights under certain mortgage and assignment documents between Taj Associates and Foothill; or (ix) credit bid and purchase at any public sale subject to the provisions of the Casino Control Act; or (x) any deficiency which exists after disposition of Taj Associates' assets securing the Working Capital Facility will be paid immediately by Taj Associates; any excess will be returned to Taj Associates, without interest. In connection with the Merger Transaction, Taj Associates will terminate the Working Capital Facility and the Company anticipates replacing it with a new $25 million facility which would be available to Trump AC and its subsidiaries, although there can be no assurance that a replacement facility could be obtained on acceptable terms, if at all. See "Risk Factors--High Leverage and Fixed Charges" and "--Risk in Refinancing and Repayment of Indebtedness; Need for Additional Financing." LEGAL PROCEEDINGS PLAZA ASSOCIATES General. Plaza Associates, its partners, certain members of its former Executive Committee, and certain of its employees, have been involved in various legal proceedings. In general, Plaza Associates has agreed to indemnify such persons and entities against any and all losses, claims, damages, expenses (including reasonable costs, disbursements and counsel fees) and liabilities (including amounts paid or incurred in satisfaction of settlements, judgments, fines and penalties) incurred by them in said legal proceedings. Such persons and entities are vigorously defending the allegations against them and intend to vigorously contest any future proceedings. Trump Plaza East. From monies made available to it, the CRDA is required to set aside $100 million for investment in hotel development projects in Atlantic City undertaken by casino licensees which result in the construction or rehabilitation of at least 200 hotel rooms by December 31, 1996. These investments are to fund up to 35% of the cost to casino licensees of such projects. See "Regulatory Matters--New Jersey Gaming Regulations--Investment Alternative Tax Obligations." Plaza Associates made application for such funding to the CRDA with respect to its proposed construction and rehabilitation of the Trump Plaza East hotel rooms and related Boardwalk and second level facilities, proposed demolition of an existing hotel expansion structure attached thereto and development of an appurtenant public park, roadway and parking area on the site thereof and proposed acquisition of the entire project site. The CRDA, in rulings through January 10, 1995, approved the hotel development project and, with respect to same, reserved to Plaza Associates the right to take investment tax credits in an amount equal to 27% ($14.1 million) of $52.4 million of eligible estimated project development costs. In October 1994, following a September 1994 CCC ruling authorizing same, Plaza Associates advised the CRDA of its intention to, without affecting either the project development costs or the tax credits, locate approximately 15,000 square feet of casino space on the second floor of Trump Plaza East and was advised by the CRDA that its proposed use of such space would not affect the approval of the hotel development project. As part of its approval and on the basis of its powers of eminent domain, the CRDA, during 1994, initiated five condemnation proceedings in the Superior Court of New Jersey, Atlantic County, to acquire certain small parcels of land within the project site. The defendants in three of those matters, with respect to parcels which impact only the public park and parking areas, Casino Reinvestment Development Authority v. Banin, et al., Docket No. ATL-L-2676-94, Casino Reinvestment Development Authority v. Sabatini, et al., Docket No. ATL-L-2976-94, and Casino Reinvestment Development Authority v. Coking, et al., Docket No. ATL-L-2974-94, asserted numerous defenses to the condemnation complaints and filed counterclaims against CRDA and third-party complaints against Plaza Associates alleging, inter alia, an improper exercise of CRDA power for private purposes and conspiracy between the CRDA and Plaza Associates. After the filing of briefs and a hearing, a New Jersey Superior Court judge issued an opinion that the Trump Plaza East acquisition and renovation was 88
424B189th Page of 203TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 89th
not eligible for CRDA funding and, as a result, the CRDA could not exercise its power of eminent domain because the project included casino floor space. The court, by order dated April 18, 1995, dismissed the condemnation complaints with prejudice. On April 17, 1995, the same judge dismissed the counter claims and third-party complaints without prejudice. Notices of appeal were filed with the New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division, on April 21, 1995 by the CRDA and on April 24, 1995 by Plaza Associates. On May 1, 1995, the Casino Association of New Jersey on behalf of its members, 11 of the 12 Atlantic City casino hotels, filed a motion to intervene or, in the alternative, for leave to appear as an amicus curiae. Briefs have been filed by all parties and the matter has been scheduled for oral argument during the week beginning April 15, 1996. The completion of the planned renovations of Trump Plaza East is not dependent upon the utilization of CRDA funding or upon the CRDA's acquisition of the real estate subject to the condemnation proceedings. Plaza Associates intends to pursue this appeal vigorously and believes it will be successful, based in part on the March 29, 1995 opinion of the New Jersey Office of Legislative Services ("OLS"), which serves as legal counsel to the New Jersey State Legislature, that N.J.S.A. 5:12-173.8 empowered the CRDA to approve and fund projects such as Trump Plaza East and, in part, on the fact that Section 173.8 expressly exempts hotel development projects from the statutory limitation with respect to any CRDA investment or project which directly and exclusively benefits the casino hotel or related facility. The OLS opinion cannot be offered by Plaza Associates and the CRDA in support of their position on the current appeal, however, because it was not considered by the trial court when it rendered its opinion. In a related matter, Vera Coking, et al. v. Atlantic City Planning Board and Trump Plaza Associates, Docket No. ATL-L-339-94, the Atlantic City Planning Board's approval of the Trump Plaza East renovation was challenged on various grounds. In July 1994, a New Jersey Superior Court judge upheld the Atlantic City Planning Board approvals with respect to the hotel renovation component of Trump Plaza East and the new roadway but invalidated the approval of the valet parking lot and the public park because Plaza Associates lacked site control with respect to the small parcels of land CRDA sought to condemn. Plaintiff appealed the court's decision upholding the approval of the hotel renovation and new roadway and Plaza Associates cross-appealed the court's decision invalidating the approval of the public park and valet parking area. Plaza Associates withdrew its cross-appeal and plaintiff's appeal is pending in the Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division, Docket No. A-1511-94- T1. Plaza Associates received land-use approval for and has constructed the valet parking area after deletion of the small parcels. In another related matter, Josef Banin and Vera Coking v. Atlantic City Planning Board and Trump Plaza Associates, Docket No. L-2188-95, the land-use approval for this area has been challenged on various grounds. Plaza Associates filed its answer to the complaint denying the allegations of the complaint. The land-use approval involves certain minor amendments to the previously granted site plan approvals for the hotel renovation component of Trump Plaza East and the new roadway. The amendments included certain design changes with respect to the Trump Plaza East and certain design changes to the roadway. The amendments did not require any variance relief and the amendments fully complied with the Land Use Ordinance of the City of Atlantic City. The plaintiffs allege the Atlantic City Planning Board acted in an arbitrary and capricious manner in approving the amendments and further argue that the chairperson of the Atlantic City Planning Board had a conflict of interest in hearing the matter because of her status as an employee of the CRDA, the entity that had approved certain funding for the project. On January 26, 1996, the New Jersey Superior Court upheld the approval of the amendment by the Atlantic City Planning Board and rejected the plaintiffs' claim with respect to the chairwoman's conflict of interest. The plaintiffs have filed a motion to the New Jersey Supreme Court for reconsideration of its decision, which motion is currently pending. The plaintiffs may thereafter appeal such decision. Penthouse Litigation. On April 3, 1989, BPHC Acquisition, Inc. and BPHC Parking Corp. (collectively, "BPHC") filed a third-party complaint (the "Complaint") against Plaza Associates and Trump. The Complaint arose in connection with the action entitled Boardwalk Properties, Inc. and Penthouse International Ltd. v. BPHC Acquisition, Inc. and BPHC Parking Corp., which was instituted on March 20, 1989 in the New Jersey Superior Court, Chancery Division, Atlantic County. 89
424B190th Page of 203TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 90th
The suit arose in connection with the conditional sale by Boardwalk Properties, Inc. ("BPI") (or, with respect to certain of the property, BPI's agreement to sell) to Trump of BPI's fee and leasehold interests in (i) Trump Plaza East, (ii) an approximately 4.2-acre parcel of land located on Atlantic Avenue, diagonally across from Trump Plaza's parking garage (the "Columbus Plaza Site") which was then owned by an entity in which 50% of the interests were each owned by BPHC and BPI and (iii) an additional 1,462 square foot parcel of land located within the area of Trump Plaza East (the "Bongiovanni Site"). Prior to BPI entering into its agreement with Trump, BPI had entered into agreements with BPHC which provided, among other things, for the sale to BPHC of Trump Plaza East, as well as BPI's interest in the Columbus Plaza Site, assuming that certain contingencies were satisfied by a certain date. Additionally, by agreement between BPHC and BPI, in the event BPHC failed to close on Trump Plaza East, BPHC would convey to BPI the Bongiovanni Site. Upon BPHC's failure to close on Trump Plaza East, BPI entered into its agreement with Trump pursuant to which it sold Trump Plaza East to Trump and instituted a lawsuit against BPHC for specific performance to compel BPHC to transfer to BPI, BPHC's interest in the Columbus Plaza Site and Bongiovanni Site, as provided for in the various agreements between BPHC and BPI and in the agreement between BPI and Trump. The Complaint alleged that Plaza Associates and/or Trump engaged in the following activities: civil conspiracy, violations of the New Jersey Antitrust Act, violations of the New Jersey RICO statute, malicious interference with contractual relations, malicious interference with prospective economic advantage, inducement to breach a fiduciary duty and malicious abuse of process. The relief sought in the Complaint included, among other things, compensatory damages, punitive damages, treble damages, injunctive relief, the revocation of all of Plaza Associates' and Trump's casino licenses, the revocation of Plaza Associates' current Certificate of Partnership, the revocation of any other licenses or permits issued to Plaza Associates and Trump by the State of New Jersey, and a declaration voiding the conveyance by BPI to Trump of BPI's interest in Trump Plaza East, as well as BPI's and/or Trump's rights to obtain title to the Columbus Plaza Site. On October 13, 1993, a final judgment as to Trump and Plaza Associates was filed. That judgment dismissed each and every claim against Trump and Plaza Associates. The case remained open as to final resolution of all claims between BPI and BPHC. Following the entry of a subsequent judgment as to those claims, BPHC and BPI have settled all claims between them. BPHC is pursuing its appeal as to Trump and Plaza Associates but only as to its money damages claims of interference with contract and prospective economic advantage and of inducing BPI to breach its fiduciary duty to BPHC. All other claims raised in BPHC's complaint as to Trump and Plaza Associates and dismissed by the October 13, 1993 judgment have been finally determined in favor of Trump and Plaza Associates. All briefs due in connection with BPHC's appeal are being filed. No argument date has been set. Other Litigation. Various legal proceedings are now pending against Plaza Associates. The Company considers all such proceedings to be ordinary litigation incident to the character of its business and not material to its business or financial condition. The majority of such claims are covered by liability insurance (subject to applicable deductibles), and the Company believes that the resolution of these claims, to the extent not covered by insurance, will not, individually or in the aggregate, have a material adverse effect on the financial condition or results of operations of the Company. From time to time, Plaza Associates may be involved in routine administrative proceedings involving allegations that it has violated certain provisions of the Casino Control Act. However, management believes that the final outcome of these proceedings will not, either individually or in the aggregate, have a material adverse effect on the Company or on the ability of Plaza Associates to otherwise retain or renew any casino or other licenses required under the Casino Control Act for the operation of Trump Plaza. TRUMP INDIANA On March 29, 1996, in the matter entitled Keshav D. Aggarwal, et al v. Donald J. Trump, Trump Hotels & Casino Resorts, Inc., Trump Hotels & Casino Resorts Holdings, L.P. and Trump Indiana, Inc., the Indiana residents with whom Trump Indiana had discussions regarding the potential purchase of non- voting stock of Trump Indiana filed a complaint with respect to this matter in the United States District Court, Southern 90
424B191st Page of 203TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 91st
District of Indiana, seeking, among other things, compensatory and punitive damages in an unspecified amount, and that the court order the defendants to transfer ownership of 7.5% of Trump Indiana to the plaintiffs. The Company and the other defendants intend to vigorously contest the allegations against them. Further, the Company believes that the resolution of these claims will not have a material adverse effect on the Company. See "Business--Indiana Riverboat." TAJ ASSOCIATES General. Taj Holding, TM/GP, TTMI and TTMC are not parties to any material legal proceedings. Taj Associates, its partners, certain members of its former Executive Committee, Taj Funding, TTMI and certain of their employees are or were involved in various legal proceedings, some of which are described below. Taj Associates and Taj Funding have agreed to indemnify such persons and entities against any and all losses, claims, damages, expenses (including reasonable costs, disbursements and counsel fees) and liabilities (including amounts paid or incurred in satisfaction of settlements, judgments, fines and penalties) incurred by them in said legal proceedings. Such persons and entities are vigorously defending the allegations against them and intend to vigorously contest any future proceedings. Atlantic City Lease Agreement. On March 29, 1990, Taj Associates entered into a lease agreement with the City of Atlantic City for a term of seven years, subject to the express, prior approval of NJDEP to continue use of the land beyond April 2, 1992, pursuant to which Taj Associates leased a parcel of land containing approximately 1,300 spaces for employee intercept parking at a cost of approximately $1 million. In addition, Taj Associates has expended in excess of $1.4 million in improving the site. The permit under which the lease is operated was issued by NJDEP on December 20, 1989 for five years and contains several conditions, one of which required Taj Associates to find another location "off-island" for employee parking by April 2, 1992. NJDEP extended this condition for two successive one-year periods through April 2, 1994. On November 14, 1994, as a result of the non-renewal of the permit, Taj Associates notified Atlantic City that the lease agreement had become inoperative and was therefore being canceled as of December 20, 1994. Taj Associates subsequently obtained "off-island" parking with TCA sufficient to meet its employee parking requirements. Atlantic City has indicated in letters to Taj Associates that it contests the cancellation of the lease agreement and claims certain extensions to the permit apply, to which Taj Associates does not agree. No legal proceedings have been commenced by Atlantic City to date. There can be no assurances that Atlantic City will not institute or pursue such an action. Other Litigation. Various legal proceedings are now pending against Taj Associates. Taj Holding considers all such proceedings to be ordinary litigation incident to the character of its business. The majority of such claims are covered by liability insurance (subject to applicable deductibles), and Taj Holding believes that the resolution of these claims, to the extent not covered by insurance, will not, individually or in the aggregate, have a material adverse effect on the financial condition or results of operations of Taj Holding. Taj Associates is also a party to a routine administrative proceeding involving allegations that it has violated certain provisions of the Casino Control Act. Taj Associates believes that the final outcome of this proceeding will not have a material adverse effect on Taj Associates or on its ability to otherwise retain or renew any casino or other licenses required under the Casino Control Act for the operation of the Taj Mahal. At this juncture, the prospects of a favorable outcome in the action described above cannot be assessed. Taj Associates intends to vigorously contest the allegations made against it. COMPETITION Competition in the Atlantic City casino hotel market is intense. The Atlantic City Properties compete with each other and with the other casino hotels located in Atlantic City, including the other casino hotel owned by Trump, Trump's Castle. See "Risk Factors--Conflicts of Interest." The Atlantic City Properties are each located on The Boardwalk, approximately 1.2 miles apart from each other. At present, there are 12 casino hotels located in Atlantic City, including the Atlantic City Properties, all of which compete for patrons. Trump Plaza and the Taj Mahal primarily compete with other Atlantic City casinos by, among other things, providing superior 91
424B192nd Page of 203TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 92nd
products and facilities, premier locations, name recognition and targeted marketing strategies. See "--Atlantic City Marketing Strategy" and "-- Facilities and Amenities."In addition, there are several sites on The Boardwalk and in the Atlantic City Marina area on which casino hotels could be built in the future and various applications for casino licenses have been filed and announcements with respect thereto made from time to time (including a proposal by Mirage Resorts, Inc.), although the Company is not aware of any current construction on such sites by third parties. No new casino hotels have commenced operations in Atlantic City since 1990, although several existing casino hotels have recently expanded or are in the process of expanding their operations. While management of the Company believes that the addition of hotel capacity would be beneficial to the Atlantic City market generally, there can be no assurance that such expansion would not be materially disadvantageous to either of the Atlantic City Properties. There also can be no assurance that the Atlantic City development projects which are planned or underway will be completed. The Atlantic City Properties also compete, or will compete, with facilities in the northeastern and mid- Atlantic regions of the United States at which casino gaming or other forms of wagering are currently, or in the future may be, authorized. To a lesser extent, the Atlantic City Properties face competition from gaming facilities nationwide, including land-based, cruise line, riverboat and dockside casinos located in Colorado, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Nevada, South Dakota, Ontario (Windsor), the Bahamas, Puerto Rico and other locations inside and outside the United States, and from other forms of legalized gaming in New Jersey and in its surrounding states such as lotteries, horse racing (including off-track betting), jai alai, bingo and dog racing, and from illegal wagering of various types. New or expanded operations by other persons can be expected to increase competition and could result in the saturation of certain gaming markets. In September 1995, New York introduced a keno lottery game, which is played on video terminals that have been set up in approximately 1,800 bars, restaurants and bowling alleys across the state. In addition to competing with other casino hotels in Atlantic City and elsewhere, by virtue of their proximity to each other and the common aspects of certain of their respective marketing efforts, including the common use of the "Trump" name, the Atlantic City Properties compete directly with each other for gaming patrons. Although management does not intend to operate Trump Plaza and the Taj Mahal to the competitive detriment of each other, the effect may be that Trump Plaza or the Taj Mahal will operate to the competitive detriment of the other. The Company anticipates that the Indiana Riverboat will compete primarily with riverboats and other casinos in the northern Indiana suburban and Chicago metropolitan area and throughout the Great Lakes Market. Although northern Indiana is part of the greater Chicago metropolitan market, which is one of the most successful new gaming markets in the United States, the Indiana Riverboat may be more dependent on patrons from northern Indiana than its Illinois competitors, and the propensity of these patrons to wager cannot be predicted with any degree of certainty. In addition to competing with Barden's riverboat at the Buffington Harbor site, the Indiana Riverboat will compete with a riverboat in Hammond, Indiana, which is being developed by the owner and operator of the Empress Riverboat Casino in Joliet, Illinois, a riverboat in East Chicago, Indiana, which is being developed by Showboat, Inc. and with the riverboat expected to be licensed in the nearby community of Michigan City, Indiana. To a lesser degree, the Indiana Riverboat will compete with the six additional riverboats expected to be licensed in the rest of Indiana. At present there are four other riverboat casino operations in the Chicago area (three of which operate two riverboats each, with each operator limited to 1,200 gaming positions in the aggregate). The Company believes that competition in the gaming industry, particularly the riverboat and dockside gaming industry, is based principally on the quality and location of gaming facilities, the effectiveness of marketing efforts, and customer service and satisfaction. Although management believes that the location of the Indiana Riverboat will allow the Company to compete effectively with other casinos in the geographic area surrounding its casino, the Company expects competition in the casino gaming industry to be intense as more casinos are opened and new entrants into the gaming industry become operational. Furthermore, new or expanded operations by other persons can be expected to increase competition for existing and future operations and could result in a saturation of the Great Lakes Market. 92
424B193rd Page of 203TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 93rd
The Indiana Riverboat will seek a competitive advantage primarily based upon its superior location, including its proximity to and direct access from Chicago, extensive parking facilities, name recognition, a superior gaming vessel and gaming experience, and targeted marketing strategies. See "-- Indiana Riverboat." In addition, a casino opened during 1994 in Windsor, Ontario, across the river from Detroit, and Detroit is considering several proposals for casinos in its downtown area. Although the Company believes that there is sufficient demand in the market to sustain the Indiana Riverboat, there can be no assurance to that effect. Legislation has also been introduced on numerous occasions in recent years to expand riverboat gaming in Illinois, including by authorizing new sites in the Chicago area with which the Indiana Riverboat would compete. The Company understands that there have been recent discussions in Illinois regarding possible legislation to permit dockside gaming and/or increase the gaming position limitations. There can be no assurance that either Indiana or Illinois, or both, will not authorize additional gaming licenses, including for the Chicago metropolitan area. See "Risk Factors--The Indiana Riverboat." In addition, the Atlantic City Properties face, and the Indiana Riverboat will face, competition from casino facilities in a number of states operated by federally recognized Native American tribes. Pursuant to IGRA, any state which permits casino-style gaming (even if only for limited charity purposes) is required to negotiate gaming contracts with federally recognized Native American tribes. Under IGRA, Native American tribes enjoy comparative freedom from regulation and taxation of gaming operations, which provides them with an advantage over their competitors, including the Atlantic City Properties and the Indiana Riverboat. In March 1996, the United States Supreme Court struck down a provision of IGRA which allowed Native American tribes to sue states in federal court for failing to negotiate gaming compacts in good faith. The Company cannot predict the impact of this decision on the ability of Native American tribes to negotiate compacts with the states. In 1991, the Mashantucket Pequot Nation opened Foxwoods Casino Resort ("Foxwoods"), a casino facility in Ledyard, Connecticut, located in the far eastern portion of such state, an approximately three-hour drive from New York City and an approximately two and one-half hour drive from Boston, which currently offers 24-hour gaming and contains over 4,000 slot machines. The Mashantucket Pequot Nation has announced various expansion plans, including its intention to build another casino in Ledyard together with hotels, restaurants and a theme park. In addition, the Mohegan Nation has commenced construction of a casino resort to be located ten miles from Foxwoods. The Mohegan Nation resort which will be built and managed by a joint venture managed by Sun International Hotels Ltd., is scheduled to have approximately 75% of the gaming capacity of Foxwoods and is scheduled to open in October 1996. In addition, the Eastern Pequots are seeking formal recognition as a Native American tribe for the purpose of opening a casino. There can be no assurance that any continued expansion of gaming operations by the Mashantucket Pequot Nation or that any commencement of gaming operations by the Mohegan Nation or Eastern Pequots would not have a materially adverse impact on Trump Plaza's or the Taj Mahal's operations. A group in New Jersey calling itself the "Ramapough Indians" has applied to the U.S. Department of the Interior to be federally recognized as a Native American tribe, which recognition would permit it to require the State of New Jersey to negotiate a gaming compact under IGRA. In 1993, the Bureau of Indian Affairs denied the Ramapough Indians federal recognition. The Ramapough Indians' appeal of this decision has been denied. Similarly, a group in Cumberland County, New Jersey calling itself the "Nanticoke Lenni Lenape" tribe has filed a notice of intent with the Bureau of Indian Affairs seeking formal federal recognition as a Native American tribe. Also, it has been reported that a Sussex County, New Jersey businessman has offered to donate land he owns there to the Oklahoma-based Lenape/Delaware Indian Nation which originated in New Jersey and already has federal recognition but does not have a reservation in New Jersey. The Lenape/Delaware Indian Nation has signed an agreement with the town of Wildwood, New Jersey to open a casino; however, the plan requires federal and state approval in order to proceed. In July 1993, the Oneida Nation opened a casino featuring 24-hour table gaming and electronic gaming systems, but without slot machines, near Syracuse, New York, and has announced an intention to open expanded gaming facilities. Representatives of the St. Regis Mohawk Nation signed a gaming compact with New York State officials for the opening of a casino, without slot machines, in the northern portion of the state close to the Canadian border. The St. Regis Mohawks have also announced their intent to open a casino at the Monticello Race Track in the Catskill Mountains region of New York; however, any Indian 93
424B194th Page of 203TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 94th
gaming operation in the Catskills is subject to the approval of the Governor of New York. The Narragansett Nation of Rhode Island, which has federal recognition, is seeking to open a casino in Rhode Island. The Gay Head Wampanoag tribe is seeking to open a casino in New Bedford, Massachusetts. Other Native American nations are seeking federal recognition, land and negotiation of gaming compacts in New York, Pennsylvania, Connecticut and other states near Atlantic City. The Pokagon Band of Potawatomi Indians of southern Michigan and northern Indiana has been federally recognized as an Indian tribe. In September 1995, the Pokagon Band of Potawatomi Indians signed a gaming compact with the governor of Michigan to build a land-based casino in southwestern Michigan and also entered into an agreement with Harrah's Entertainment, Inc. to develop and manage the casino. The Company understands that the Pokagon Band of Potawatomi Indians have been in discussions with local authorities regarding a potential land-based casino in northern Indiana, although the governor of Indiana has stated that no compact negotiations are underway. Legislation permitting other forms of casino gaming has been proposed, from time to time, in various states, including those bordering New Jersey. Plans to begin operating slot machines at race tracks in the state of Delaware are underway, including the slot machines currently operating at the Dover Downs and Delaware Park race tracks. Six states have presently legalized riverboat gambling while others are considering its approval, including New York and Pennsylvania, and New York City is considering a plan under which it would be the embarking point for gambling cruises into international waters three miles offshore. Several states are considering or have approved large scale land- based casinos. Additionally, since 1993, the gaming space in Las Vegas has expanded significantly, with additional capacity planned and currently under construction. The operations of Trump Plaza and the Taj Mahal could be adversely affected by such competition, particularly if casino gaming were permitted in jurisdictions near or elsewhere in New Jersey or in other states in the Northeast. In December 1993, the Rhode Island Lottery Commission approved the addition of slot machine games on video terminals at Lincoln Greyhound Park and Newport Jai Alai, where poker and blackjack have been offered for over two years. Currently, casino gaming, other than Native American gaming, is not allowed in other areas of New Jersey or in Connecticut, New York or Pennsylvania. On November 17, 1995, a proposal to allow casino gaming in Bridgeport, Connecticut, was voted down by that state's Senate. A New York State Assembly plan has the potential of legalizing non- Native American gaming in portions of upstate New York. Essential to this plan is a proposed New York State constitutional amendment that would legalize gambling. To amend the New York Constitution, the next elected New York State Legislature must repass a proposal legalizing gaming and a statewide referendum, held no sooner than November 1997, must approve the constitutional amendment. To the extent that legalized gaming becomes more prevalent in New Jersey or other jurisdictions near Atlantic City, competition would intensify. In particular, a proposal has been introduced to legalize gaming in other locations, including Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. In addition, legislation has from time to time been introduced in the New Jersey State Legislature relating to types of statewide legalized gaming, such as video games with small wagers. To date, no such legislation, which may require a state constitutional amendment, has been enacted. The Company is unable to predict whether any such legislation, in New Jersey, Indiana, Illinois or elsewhere, will be enacted or whether, if passed, it would have a material adverse impact on the Company. 94
424B195th Page of 203TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 95th
REGULATORY MATTERS The following is only a summary of the applicable provisions of the Casino Control Act of the State of New Jersey, the Riverboat Gambling Act of the State of Indiana and certain other laws and regulations. It does not purport to be a full description thereof and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the New Jersey Casino Control Act, the Indiana Riverboat Gambling Act and such other laws and regulations. Unless otherwise indicated, all references to "Trump Plaza" include (a) Trump Plaza's main tower, including Trump Plaza East (which operates pursuant to a casino license held by Plaza Associates) and (b) Trump World's Fair (which will operate pursuant to a separate casino license). Each of the Company and Taj Holding believes that it and its respective affiliates are in material compliance with all applicable laws, rules and regulations discussed below. NEW JERSEY GAMING REGULATIONS In general, the Casino Control Act and its implementing regulations contain detailed provisions concerning, among other things: the granting and renewal of casino licenses; the suitability of the approved hotel facility, and the amount of authorized casino space and gaming units permitted therein; the qualification of natural persons and entities related to the casino licensee; the licensing of certain employees and vendors of casino licensees; rules of the games; the selling and redeeming of gaming chips; the granting and duration of credit and the enforceability of gaming debts; management control procedures, accounting and cash control methods and reports to gaming agencies; security standards; the manufacture and distribution of gaming equipment; the simulcasting of horse races by casino licensees; equal employment opportunities for employees of casino operators, contractors of casino facilities and others; and advertising, entertainment and alcoholic beverages. Casino Control Commission. The ownership and operation of casino/hotel facilities in Atlantic City are the subject of strict state regulation under the Casino Control Act. The CCC is empowered to regulate a wide spectrum of gaming and non-gaming related activities and to approve the form of ownership and financial structure of not only a casino licensee, but also its entity qualifiers and intermediary and holding companies and any other related entity required to be qualified ("CCC Regulations"). Operating Licenses. Taj Associates was issued its initial casino license in April 1990. On June 22, 1995, the CCC renewed Taj Associates' casino license through March 31, 1999. Plaza Associates was issued its initial casino license on May 14, 1984. On June 22, 1995, the CCC renewed Plaza Associates' casino license through June 30, 1999. On April 9, 1996, the CCC issued a casino license to Plaza Associates for Trump World's Fair, which license will become effective upon the issuance by the CCC of an operation certificate for the Trump World's Fair facility. The casino license issued for Trump World's Fair will expire one year from its effective date, unless renewed. Casino Licensee. No casino hotel facility may operate unless the appropriate license and approvals are obtained from the CCC, which has broad discretion with regard to the issuance, renewal, revocation and suspension of such licenses and approvals, which are non-transferable. The qualification criteria with respect to the holder of a casino license include its financial stability, integrity and responsibility; the integrity and adequacy of its financial resources which bear any relation to the casino project; its good character, honesty and integrity; and the sufficiency of its business ability and casino experience to establish the likelihood of a successful, efficient casino operation. The casino licenses currently held by Taj Associates and Plaza Associates, with respect to Trump Plaza, are renewable for periods of up to four years. The casino license currently held by Plaza Associates with respect to Trump World's Fair is renewable for up to one year for each of its first two renewals after its initial issuance, and thereafter for periods of up to four years. The CCC may reopen licensing hearings at any time, and must reopen a licensing hearing at the request of the Division of Gaming Enforcement (the "Division"). Each casino license entitles the holder to operate one casino, which must consist of a "single room." Further, no person may be the holder of a casino license if the holding of such license will result in undue 95
424B196th Page of 203TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 96th
economic concentration in Atlantic City casino operations by that person. On May 17, 1995, the CCC adopted a regulation defining the criteria for determining undue economic concentration which codifies the content of existing CCC precedent with respect to the subject. In April 1995, Plaza Associates petitioned the CCC for certain approvals. In its May 18, 1995 declaratory rulings with respect to such petition, the CCC, among other things, (i) determined that Trump World's Fair is an approved hotel permitted to contain a maximum of 60,000 square feet of casino space, that the 40,000 square feet of casino space therein is a "single room" and that its operation by Plaza Associates would not result in undue economic concentration in Atlantic City casino operations; (ii) approved the operation of Trump World's Fair by Plaza Associates under a separate casino license subject to an application for and the issuance of such license and approved the proposed easement agreements with respect to the proposed enclosed Atlantic City Convention Center walkway; (iii) approved in concept the proposed physical connection and integrated operation by Plaza Associates of Trump Plaza's main tower, Trump Plaza East and Trump World's Fair; and (iv) determined that the approved hotel comprised of the main tower and Trump Plaza East is permitted to contain a maximum of 100,000 square feet of casino space. In addition, on December 13, 1995, Plaza Associates received CCC authorization for 49,340 square feet of casino space at Trump World's Fair. On April 9, 1996, the CCC issued to Plaza Associates a separate casino license with respect to Trump World's Fair, which license will become effective upon the issuance by the CCC of an operation certificate for the Trump World's Fair facility. In addition, Taj Associates will be required to obtain a prior determination from the CCC that the operation of the additional casino space created by the Taj Mahal Expansion will not constitute undue economic concentration of Atlantic City casino operations, and that such casino space, together with the Taj Mahal's existing casino space, is a "single room" under the Casino Control Act. See "Risk Factors--Atlantic City Properties Expansion." To be considered financially stable, a licensee must demonstrate the following ability: to pay winning wagers when due; to achieve an annual gross operating profit; to pay all local, state and federal taxes and all taxes and fees imposed by the Casino Control Act or the CCC when due; to make necessary capital and maintenance expenditures to insure that it has a superior first- class facility of exceptional quality; and to pay, exchange, refinance or extend debts which will mature or become due and payable during the license term or otherwise manage such debts or any default of such debts. The CCC has approved the Merger Transaction with regard to the financial stability standards. In the event a licensee fails to demonstrate financial stability, the CCC may take such action as it deems necessary to fulfill the purposes of the Casino Control Act and protect the public interest, including: issuing conditional licenses, approvals or determinations; establishing an appropriate cure period; imposing reporting requirements; placing restrictions on the transfer of cash or the assumption of liabilities; requiring reasonable reserves or trust accounts; denying licensure; or appointing a conservator. See "--Conservatorship." The Company believes that, upon consummation of the Merger Transaction, Taj Associates and Plaza Associates will each have, and will each continue to have, adequate financial resources to meet the financial stability requirements of the CCC for the foreseeable future. The Merger Transaction (including the issuance of $1.1 billion of Mortgage Notes) was approved by the CCC on April 9, 1996. On April 11, 1996, the CCC approved the issuance of an additional $100 million of Mortgage Notes to be included in the Mortgage Note Offering. Such approvals satisfied the condition to the consummation of the Merger that the Merger Transaction be approved by the CCC. Pursuant to the Casino Control Act, CCC Regulations and precedent, no entity may hold a casino license unless each officer, director, principal employee, person who directly or indirectly holds any beneficial interest or ownership in the licensee, each person who in the opinion of the CCC has the ability to control the licensee or elect a majority of the board of directors of the licensee (other than a banking or other licensed lending institution which makes a loan or holds a mortgage or other lien acquired in the ordinary course of business) and any lender, underwriter, agent or employee of the licensee or other person whom the CCC may consider appropriate, obtains and maintains qualification approval from the CCC. Qualification approval means that such person must, but for residence, individually meet the qualification requirements as a casino key employee. Pursuant to a condition of its casino license, if the Working Capital Facility is not replaced and Taj Associates' cash position falls below $5.0 million for three consecutive business days, Taj Associates must present to the CCC and the Division evidence as to why it should not obtain a working capital facility in an appropriate amount. 96
424B197th Page of 203TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 97th
Control Persons. An entity qualifier or intermediary or holding company, such as Taj Holding, TM/GP, Trump AC, Plaza Holding Inc., Plaza Funding, THCR Holdings, THCR Funding or the Company is required to register with the CCC and meet the same basic standards for approval as a casino licensee; provided, however, that the CCC, with the concurrence of the Director of the Division, may waive compliance by a publicly-traded corporate holding company with the requirement that an officer, director, lender, underwriter, agent or employee thereof, or person directly or indirectly holding a beneficial interest or ownership of the securities thereof, individually qualify for approval under casino key employee standards so long as the CCC and the Director of the Division are, and remain, satisfied that such officer, director, lender, underwriter, agent or employee is not significantly involved in the activities of the casino licensee, or that such security holder does not have the ability to control the publicly-traded corporate holding company or elect one or more of its directors. Persons holding five percent or more of the equity securities of such holding company are presumed to have the ability to control the company or elect one or more of its directors and will, unless this presumption is rebutted, be required to individually qualify. Equity securities are defined as any voting stock or any security similar to or convertible into or carrying a right to acquire any security having a direct or indirect participation in the profits of the issuer. Financial Sources. The CCC may require all financial backers, investors, mortgagees, bond holders and holders of notes or other evidence of indebtedness, either in effect or proposed, which bear any relation to any casino project, including holders of publicly-traded securities of an entity which holds a casino license or is an entity qualifier, subsidiary or holding company of a casino licensee (a "Regulated Company"), to qualify as financial sources. In the past, the CCC generally has waived the qualification requirement for holders of less than 15% of a series of publicly-traded mortgage bonds so long as the bonds remained widely distributed and freely traded in the public market and the holder had no ability to control the casino licensee. On April 9, 1996, the CCC determined that, subject to the receipt by the CCC of a list of the Mortgage Note holders within 30 days of the consummation of the Merger, the Mortgage Notes will be widely distributed and freely traded in the public market, the holders of Mortgage Notes have no ability to control either Taj Associates or Plaza Associates as a casino licensee, no holder is required to qualify as a financial source or security holder, and those holders that are institutional investors are waivable as such. Institutional Investors. An institutional investor ("Institutional Investor") is defined by the Casino Control Act as any retirement fund administered by a public agency for the exclusive benefit of Federal, state or local public employees; any investment company registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended; any collective investment trust organized by banks under Part Nine of the Rules of the Comptroller of the Currency; any closed end investment trust; any chartered or licensed life insurance company or property and casualty insurance company; any banking and other chartered or licensed lending institution; any investment advisor registered under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended; and such other persons as the CCC may determine for reasons consistent with the policies of the Casino Control Act. An Institutional Investor may be granted a waiver by the CCC from financial source or other qualification requirements applicable to a holder of publicly- traded securities, in the absence of a prima facie showing by the Division that there is any cause to believe that the holder may be found unqualified, on the basis of CCC findings that: (i) its holdings were purchased for investment purposes only and, upon request by the CCC, it files a certified statement to the effect that it has no intention of influencing or affecting the affairs of the issuer, the casino licensee or its holding or intermediary companies; provided, however, that the Institutional Investor will be permitted to vote on matters put to the vote of the outstanding security holders; and (ii) if (x) the securities are debt securities of a casino licensee's holding or intermediary companies or another subsidiary company of the casino licensee's holding or intermediary companies which is related in any way to the financing of the casino licensee and represent either (A) 20% or less of the total outstanding debt of the company or (B) 50% or less of any issue of outstanding debt of the company, (y) the securities are equity securities and represent less than 10% of the equity securities of a casino licensee's holding or intermediary companies or (z) the securities so held exceed such percentages, upon a showing of good cause. There can be no assurance, however, that the CCC will make such findings or grant such waiver and, in any event, an Institutional Investor may be required to produce for the CCC or the Division upon request, any document or information which bears any relation to such debt or equity securities. 97
424B198th Page of 203TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 98th
Generally, the CCC requires each institutional holder seeking waiver of qualification to execute a certification to the effect that (i) the holder has reviewed the definition of Institutional Investor under the Casino Control Act and believes that it meets the definition of Institutional Investor; (ii) the holder purchased the securities for investment purposes only and holds them in the ordinary course of business; (iii) the holder has no involvement in the business activities of and no intention of influencing or affecting, the affairs of the issuer, the casino licensee or any affiliate; and (iv) if the holder subsequently determines to influence or affect the affairs of the issuer, the casino licensee or any affiliate, it shall provide not less than 30 days' prior notice of such intent and shall file with the CCC an application for qualification before taking any such action. If an Institutional Investor changes its investment intent, or if the CCC finds reasonable cause to believe that it may be found unqualified, the Institutional Investor may take no action with respect to the security holdings, other than to divest itself of such holdings, until it has applied for interim casino authorization and has executed a trust agreement pursuant to such an application. See "--Interim Casino Authorization." Declaratory Rulings. On April 9, 1996, Taj Associates and Plaza Associates received from the CCC declaratory rulings approving the Merger Transaction and determining, among other things, that after consummation thereof, Taj Associates and Plaza Associates will continue to satisfy the CCC's financial stability requirements; the Regulated Companies and natural person qualifiers, including Trump, are qualified; the certificates of incorporation and partnership agreements of the Regulated Companies contain required provisions with respect to the transfer of securities and qualification of security holders under the Casino Control Act; the Mortgage Notes are publicly-traded securities and that CCC approval of the issuance or subsequent transfer of the securities is not required; the individual holders of the Mortgage Notes need not be qualified as financial sources and security holders, and their qualification may be waived by the CCC; and qualification of the holders of Common Stock may be waived by the CCC. Ownership and Transfer of Securities. The Casino Control Act imposes certain restrictions upon the issuance, ownership and transfer of securities of a Regulated Company and defines the term "security" to include instruments which evidence a direct or indirect beneficial ownership or creditor interest in a Regulated Company including, but not limited to, mortgages, debentures, security agreements, notes and warrants. Currently, each of TM/GP, TTMC, Taj Holding, Taj Funding, Taj Associates, TTMI, certain other entities that own Taj Holding Class A Common Stock or Taj Holding Class B Common Stock, Plaza Funding, Trump AC, Plaza Holding Inc., Plaza Associates, THCR Holdings, THCR Funding and the Company are each deemed to be a Regulated Company, and instruments evidencing a beneficial ownership or creditor interest therein, including a partnership interest, are deemed to be the securities of a Regulated Company. If the CCC finds that a holder of such securities is not qualified under the Casino Control Act, it has the right to take any remedial action it may deem appropriate, including the right to force divestiture by such disqualified holder of such securities. In the event that certain disqualified holders fail to divest themselves of such securities, the CCC has the power to revoke or suspend the casino license affiliated with the Regulated Company which issued the securities. If a holder is found unqualified, it is unlawful for the holder (i) to exercise, directly or through any trustee or nominee, any right conferred by such securities or (ii) to receive any dividends or interest upon such securities or any remuneration, in any form, from its affiliated casino licensee for services rendered or otherwise. With respect to non-publicly-traded securities, the Casino Control Act and CCC Regulations require that the corporate charter or partnership agreement of a Regulated Company establish a right in the CCC of prior approval with regard to transfers of securities, shares and other interests and an absolute right in the Regulated Company to repurchase at the market price or the purchase price, whichever is the lesser, any such security, share or other interest in the event that the CCC disapproves a transfer. With respect to publicly-traded securities, such corporate charter or partnership agreement is required to establish that any such securities of the entity are held subject to the condition that, if a holder thereof is found to be disqualified by the CCC, such holder shall dispose of such securities. See "Description of Capital Stock--Common Stock and Class B Common Stock." Interim Casino Authorization. Interim casino authorization is a process which permits a person who enters into a contract to obtain property relating to a casino operation or who obtains publicly-traded securities relating 98
424B199th Page of 203TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 99th
to a casino licensee to close on the contract or own the securities until plenary licensure or qualification. During the period of interim casino authorization, the property relating to the casino operation or the securities is held in trust. Whenever any person enters into a contract to transfer any property which relates to an ongoing casino operation, including a security of the casino licensee or a holding or intermediary company or entity qualifier, under circumstances which would require that the transferee obtain licensure or be qualified under the Casino Control Act, and that person is not already licensed or qualified, the transferee is required to apply for interim casino authorization. Furthermore, except as set forth below with respect to publicly-traded securities, the closing or settlement date in the contract at issue may not be earlier than the 121st day after the submission of a complete application for licensure or qualification together with a fully executed trust agreement in a form approved by the CCC. If, after the report of the Division and a hearing by the CCC, the CCC grants interim authorization, the property will be subject to a trust. If the CCC denies interim authorization, the contract may not close or settle until the CCC makes a determination on the qualifications of the applicant. If the CCC denies qualification, the contract will be terminated for all purposes and there will be no liability on the part of the transferor. If, as the result of a transfer of publicly-traded securities of a licensee, a holding or intermediary company or entity qualifier of a licensee or a financing entity of a licensee, any person is required to qualify under the Casino Control Act, that person is required to file an application for licensure or qualification within 30 days after the CCC determines that qualification is required or declines to waive qualification. The application must include a fully executed trust agreement in a form approved by the CCC or, in the alternative, within 120 days after the CCC determines that qualification is required, the person whose qualification is required must divest such securities as the CCC may require in order to remove the need to qualify. The CCC may grant interim casino authorization where it finds by clear and convincing evidence that: (i) statements of compliance have been issued pursuant to the Casino Control Act; (ii) the casino hotel is an approved hotel in accordance with the Casino Control Act; (iii) the trustee satisfies qualification criteria applicable to key casino employees, except for residency; and (iv) interim operation will best serve the interests of the public. When the CCC finds the applicant qualified, the trust will terminate. If the CCC denies qualification to a person who has received interim casino authorization, the trustee is required to endeavor, and is authorized, to sell, assign, convey or otherwise dispose of the property subject to the trust to such persons who are licensed or qualified or shall themselves obtain interim casino authorization. Where a holder of publicly-traded securities is required, in applying for qualification as a financial source or qualifier, to transfer such securities to a trust in application for interim casino authorization and the CCC thereafter orders that the trust become operative: (i) during the time the trust is operative, the holder may not participate in the earnings of the casino hotel or receive any return on its investment or debt security holdings; and (ii) after disposition, if any, of the securities by the trustee, proceeds distributed to the unqualified holder may not exceed the lower of their actual cost to the unqualified holder or their value calculated as if the investment had been made on the date the trust became operative. Approved Hotel Facilities. The CCC may permit an existing licensee, such as Taj Associates and Plaza Associates, to increase its casino space if the licensee agrees to add a prescribed number of qualifying sleeping units within two years after the commencement of gaming operations in the additional casino space. However, if the casino licensee does not fulfill such agreement due to conditions within its control, the licensee will be required to close the additional casino space, or any portion thereof that the CCC determines should be closed. See "Risk Factors--Atlantic City Properties Expansion." Persons who are parties to the lease for an approved hotel building or who have an agreement to lease a building which may in the judgment of the CCC become an approved hotel building are required to hold a casino license unless the CCC, with the concurrence of the Attorney General of the State of New Jersey, determines 99
424B1100th Page of 203TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 100th
that such persons do not have the ability to exercise significant control over the building or the operation of the casino therein. Unless otherwise determined by the CCC, agreements to lease an approved hotel building or the land under the building must be for a durational term exceeding 30 years, must concern 100% of the entire approved hotel building or the land upon which it is located and must include a buy-out provision conferring upon the lessee the absolute right to purchase the lessor's entire interest for a fixed sum in the event that the lessor is found by the CCC to be unsuitable. In its May 18, 1995 declaratory rulings with respect to the proposed enclosed Atlantic City Convention Center walkway to Trump World's Fair, the CCC, among other things, approved the proposed easement agreements with respect to such walkway and determined, with the concurrence of the Attorney General, that no CCC license is required to grant the easement and that the easements satisfy the durational term requirement and need not concern 100% of the entire approved hotel building or include such a buy-out provision. See "Business --Properties--Trump Plaza--Trump World's Fair." Agreement for Management of Casino. Each party to an agreement for the management of a casino is required to hold a casino license, and the party who is to manage the casino must own at least 10% of all the outstanding equity securities of the casino licensee or any eligible applicant for a casino license. Such an agreement shall: (i) provide for the complete management of the casino; (ii) provide for the sole and unrestricted power to direct the casino operations; and (iii) provide for a term long enough to ensure the reasonable continuity, stability and independence and management of the casino. License Fees. The CCC is authorized to establish annual fees for the renewal of casino licenses. The renewal fee is based upon the cost of maintaining control and regulatory activities prescribed by the Casino Control Act, and may not be less than $200,000 for a four-year casino license. Additionally, casino licensees are subject to potential assessments to fund any annual operating deficits incurred by the CCC or the Division. There is also an annual license fee of $500 for each slot machine maintained for use or in use in any casino. Gross Revenue Tax. Each casino licensee is also required to pay an annual tax of 8% on its gross casino revenues. For the years ended December 31, 1993, 1994 and 1995 Plaza Associates' gross revenue tax was approximately $21.3 million, $21.0 million and $24.0 million, respectively, and its license, investigation and other fees and assessments totaled approximately $4.0 million, $4.2 million and $4.4 million, respectively. For the years ended December 31, 1993, 1994 and 1995, Taj Associates' gross revenue tax was approximately $35.4 million, $36.7 million and $40.2 million, respectively, and its license, investigation and other fees and assessments totaled approximately $5.2 million, $5.2 million and $5.2 million, respectively. Investment Alternative Tax Obligations. An investment alternative tax imposed on the gross casino revenues of each licensee in the amount of 2.5% is due and payable on the last day of April following the end of the calendar year. A licensee is obligated to pay the investment alternative tax for a period of 30 years. Estimated payments of the investment alternative tax obligation must be made quarterly in an amount equal to 1.25% of estimated gross revenues for the preceding three-month period. Investment tax credits may be obtained by making qualified investments or by the purchase of bonds issued by the CRDA. CRDA bonds may have terms as long as 50 years and bear interest at below market rates, resulting in a value lower than the face value of such CRDA bonds. For the first ten years of its tax obligation, the licensee is entitled to an investment tax credit against the investment alternative tax in an amount equal to twice the purchase price of bonds issued to the licensee by the CRDA. Thereafter, the licensee (i) is entitled to an investment tax credit in an amount equal to twice the purchase price of such bonds or twice the amount of its investments authorized in lieu of such bond investments or made in projects designated as eligible by the CRDA and (ii) has the option of entering into a contract with the CRDA 100
424B1101st Page of 203TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 101st
to have its tax credit comprised of direct investments in approved eligible projects which may not comprise more than 50% of its eligible tax credit in any one year. From the monies made available to the CRDA, the CRDA is required to set aside $100 million for investment in hotel development projects in Atlantic City undertaken by a licensee which result in the construction or rehabilitation of at least 200 hotel rooms. These monies will be held to fund up to 35% of the cost to casino licensees of expanding their hotel facilities to provide additional hotel rooms, a portion of which will be required to be available upon the opening of the new Atlantic City convention center and dedicated to convention events. The CRDA has determined at this time that eligible casino licensees will receive up to 27% of the cost of additional hotel rooms out of these monies set aside and may, in the future, increase the percentage to no greater than 35%. Minimum Casino Parking Charges. As of July 1, 1993, each casino licensee was required to pay the New Jersey State Treasurer a $1.50 charge for every use of a parking space for the purpose of parking, garaging or storing motor vehicles in a parking facility owned or leased by a casino licensee or by any person on behalf of a casino licensee. This amount is paid into a special fund established and held by the New Jersey State Treasurer for the exclusive use of the CRDA. Plaza Associates and Taj Associates currently charge their respective parking patrons $2.00 in order to make their required payments to the New Jersey State Treasurer and cover related expenses. Amounts in the special fund will be expended by the CRDA for eligible projects in the corridor region of Atlantic City related to improving the highways, roads, infrastructure, traffic regulation and public safety of Atlantic City or otherwise necessary or useful to the economic development and redevelopment of Atlantic City in this regard. Atlantic City Fund. On each October 31 during the years 1996 through 2003, each casino licensee shall pay into an account established in the CRDA and known as the Atlantic City Fund, its proportional share of an amount related to the amount by which annual operating expenses of the CCC and the Antitrust Division are less than a certain fixed sum. Additionally, a portion of the investment alternative tax obligation of each casino licensee for the years 1994 through 1998 allocated for projects in Northern New Jersey shall be paid into and credited to the Atlantic City Fund. Amounts in the Atlantic City Fund will be expended by the CRDA for economic development projects of a revenue producing nature that foster the redevelopment of Atlantic City other than the construction and renovation of casino hotels. Conservatorship. If, at any time, it is determined that TM/GP, TTMC, Taj Holding, Taj Funding, Taj Associates, TTMI, Plaza Associates, Plaza Funding, Plaza Holding Inc., Trump AC, the Company, THCR Holdings, THCR Funding or any other entity qualifier has violated the Casino Control Act or that any of such entities cannot meet the qualification requirements of the Casino Control Act, such entity could be subject to fines or the suspension or revocation of its license or qualification. If a casino license is suspended for a period in excess of 120 days or is revoked, or if the CCC fails or refuses to renew such casino license, the CCC could appoint a conservator to operate and dispose of such licensee's casino hotel facilities. A conservator would be vested with title to all property of such licensee relating to the casino and the approved hotel subject to valid liens and/or encumbrances. The conservator would be required to act under the direct supervision of the CCC and would be charged with the duty of conserving, preserving and, if permitted, continuing the operation of the casino hotel. During the period of the conservatorship, a former or suspended casino licensee is entitled to a fair rate of return out of net earnings, if any, on the property retained by the conservator. The CCC may also discontinue any conservatorship action and direct the conservator to take such steps as are necessary to effect an orderly transfer of the property of a former or suspended casino licensee. Qualification of Employees. Certain employees of Taj Associates and Plaza Associates must be licensed by or registered with the CCC, depending on the nature of the position held. Casino employees are subject to more stringent requirements than non-casino employees and must meet applicable standards pertaining to 101
424B1102nd Page of 203TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 102nd
financial stability, integrity and responsibility, good character, honesty and integrity, business ability and casino experience and New Jersey residency. These requirements have resulted in significant competition among Atlantic City casino operators for the services of qualified employees. Gaming Credit. Taj Associates' and Plaza Associates' casino games are conducted on a credit as well as cash basis. Gaming debts arising in Atlantic City in accordance with applicable regulations are enforceable in the courts of the State of New Jersey. The extension of gaming credit is subject to regulations that detail procedures which casinos must follow when granting gaming credit and recording counter checks which have been exchanged, redeemed or consolidated. Control Procedures. Gaming at the Taj Mahal and Trump Plaza is conducted by trained and supervised personnel. Taj Associates and Plaza Associates employ extensive security and internal controls. Security checks are made to determine, among other matters, that job applicants for key positions have had no criminal history or associations. Security controls utilized by the surveillance department include closed circuit video camera to monitor the casino floor and money counting areas. The count of moneys from gaming also is observed daily by representatives of the CCC. INDIANA GAMING REGULATIONS Indiana Gaming Commission. The ownership and operation of riverboat gaming operations in Indiana are subject to strict state regulation under the Riverboat Gambling Act and the administrative rules promulgated thereunder. The IGC is empowered to administer, regulate and enforce the system of riverboat gaming established under the Riverboat Gambling Act and has jurisdiction and supervision over all riverboat gaming operations in Indiana, as well as all persons on riverboats where gaming operations are conducted. The IGC is empowered to regulate a wide variety of gaming and non-gaming related activities, including the licensing of suppliers to, and employees at, riverboat gaming operations and to approve the form of ownership and financial structure of not only riverboat owner and supplier licensees, but also their entity qualifiers and intermediary and holding companies. Indiana is a new gaming jurisdiction and the emerging regulatory framework is not yet complete. The IGC has adopted certain final rules and has published others in proposed or draft form which are proceeding through the review and final adoption process. The IGC also has indicated its intent to publish additional proposed rules in the future. The IGC has broad rulemaking power, and it is impossible to predict what effect, if any, the amendment of existing rules or the finalization of currently new rules might have on the operations of the Indiana Riverboat or the Company. The following reflects both adopted and proposed regulations. Further, the Indiana General Assembly has the power to promulgate new laws and implement amendments to the Riverboat Gambling Act, which could materially affect the operation or economic viability of the gaming industry in Indiana. Certificate of Suitability. On December 9, 1994, the IGC ordered that a "Certificate of Suitability" for a riverboat owner's license for a riverboat to be docked in Buffington Harbor, Indiana, be issued to Trump Indiana. The certificate of suitability constitutes approval of the application of Trump Indiana for a riverboat owner's license. The IGC extended Trump Indiana's certificate of suitability until June 28, 1996. Pursuant to the terms of the certificate of suitability, during such period, Trump Indiana must comply with certain statutory and other requirements imposed by the IGC. In addition, as a condition to the certificate of suitability, Trump Indiana has committed to invest $153 million in the Indiana Riverboat and certain related projects and to pay certain incentive fees to the City of Gary, Indiana. Failure to comply with the foregoing conditions and/or failure to commence riverboat excursions as required by the IGC may result in revocation of the certificate of suitability. There can be no assurance that the Company and/or Trump Indiana will be able to comply with the terms of the certificate of suitability, that it will be further extended if operations do not commence as required by the IGC or that a riverboat owner's license for the Indiana Riverboat will ultimately be granted or subsequently renewed. Riverboat Owner's License. No one may operate a riverboat gaming operation in Indiana without holding a riverboat owner's license. The certificate of suitability received by Trump Indiana on December 9, 1994 and 102
424B1103rd Page of 203TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 103rd
most recently extended through June 28, 1996 means that Trump Indiana received a written document issued by the Executive Director of the IGC that indicates that Trump Indiana has been chosen for licensure if Trump Indiana meets certain requirements within the interim compliance period as established by the IGC. The interim compliance period is the period of time between the issuance of the certificate of suitability and the issuance of a permanent riverboat owner's license or the notice of denial thereof. The Company anticipates that its riverboat owner's license (which would supersede the certificate of suitability) would impose substantially similar conditions on the operations of the Indiana Riverboat, although no assurances may be made. Interim Compliance Requirements. Interim compliance requires, among other things: obtaining a permit to develop the riverboat gaming operation from the United States Army Corps of Engineers, which permit was obtained on October 10, 1995; obtaining a valid certificate of inspection from the United States Coast Guard for the vessel on which the riverboat gaming operation will be conducted; applying for and receiving the appropriate permits or certificates from the Indiana Alcoholic Beverage Commission, Indiana Fire Marshall, and other appropriate local, state and federal agencies which issue permits including, but not limited to, health permits, building permits and zoning permits; closing the financing necessary to complete the development of the gaming operation; posting a bond in compliance with the applicable law; obtaining the insurance deemed necessary by the IGC; receiving licensure for electronic gaming devices and other gaming equipment under applicable law; submitting an emergency response plan in compliance with applicable laws; and taking any other action that the IGC deems necessary for compliance under Indiana gaming laws. Further, the IGC may place restrictions, conditions or requirements on the permanent riverboat owner's license. An owner's initial license expires five years after the effective date of the license, and unless the owner's license is terminated, expires or is revoked, the owner's license may be renewed annually by the IGC upon satisfaction of certain conditions contained in the Riverboat Gambling Act. Transfer of Riverboat Owner's License. Pursuant to IGC proposed rules, an ownership interest in a riverboat owner's license shall not be transferred unless the transfer complies with applicable rules, and no riverboat gaming operation may operate unless the appropriate licenses and approvals are obtained from the IGC. Under current Indiana law, a maximum of 11 owner's licenses may be in effect at any time. No person or entity may simultaneously own an interest in more than two riverboat owner's licenses. A person or entity may simultaneously own up to 100% in one riverboat owner's license and no more than 10% in a second riverboat owner's license. A riverboat owner's licensee must possess a level of skill, experience, or knowledge necessary to conduct a riverboat gaming operation that will have a positive economic impact on the host site, as well as the entire State of Indiana. Additional representative, but not exclusive, qualification criteria with respect to the holder of a riverboat owner's license include character, reputation, financial integrity, the facilities or proposed facilities for the conduct of riverboat gaming including related non-gaming projects such as hotel development, and the good faith affirmative action plan to recruit, train and upgrade minorities and women in all employment classifications. The IGC shall require persons holding owner's licenses to adopt policies concerning the preferential hiring of residents of the city in which the riverboat docks for riverboat jobs. The IGC has broad discretion in regard to the issuance, renewal, revocation, and suspension of licenses and approvals, and the IGC is empowered to regulate a wide variety of gaming and non-gaming related activities, including the licensing of suppliers to, and employees at, riverboat gaming operations, and to approve the form of ownership and financial structure of not only riverboat owner and supplier licensees, but also their subsidiaries and affiliates. A riverboat owner's licensee or any other person may not lease, hypothecate, borrow money against or loan money against a riverboat owner's license. An ownership interest in a riverboat owner's license may only be transferred in accordance with the regulations promulgated under the Riverboat Gambling Act. An applicant for the approval of a transfer of a riverboat owner's license must comply with application procedures prescribed by the IGC, present evidence that it meets or possesses the standards, qualifications and other criteria under Indiana gaming laws that it meets all requirements for a riverboat owner's license, and pay an investigative fee in the amount of $50,000 with the application. If the IGC denies the application to transfer an ownership interest, it 103
424B1104th Page of 203TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 104th
shall issue notice of denial to the applicant, and, unless, specifically stated to the contrary, a notice of denial of an application for transfer shall not constitute a finding that the applicant is not suitable for licensure. A person who is served with notice of denial under this rule may request an administrative hearing. Control Persons and Operational Matters. The IGC has implemented strict regulations with respect to the suitability of riverboat license owners, their key personnel and their employees similar to the CCC regulations and precedent. The IGC utilizes a "class-based" licensing structure that subjects all individuals associated with Trump Indiana to varying degrees of background investigations. Likewise, comprehensive security measures, including video surveillance by both random and fixed cameras, are required in the casino and money counting areas. Additionally, the IGC has delineated procedures for the reconciliation of the daily revenues and tax remittance to the state as further detailed below. Tax. Under Indiana gaming law, a tax is imposed on admissions to gaming excursions at a rate of three dollars for each person admitted to the gaming excursion. This admission tax is imposed upon the license owner conducting the gaming excursion on a per-person basis without regard to the actual fee paid by the person using the ticket, with the exception that no tax shall be paid by admittees who are actual and necessary officials, employees of the licensee or other persons actually working on the riverboat. The IGC may suspend or revoke the license of a riverboat owner's licensee that does not submit the payment or the tax return form regarding admission tax within the required time established by the IGC. A tax is imposed on the adjusted gross receipts received from gaming authorized under the Riverboat Gambling Act at a rate of 20% of the amount of the adjusted gross receipts. Adjusted gross receipts is defined as the total of all cash and property (including checks received by a licensee), whether collected or not, received by a licensee from gaming operations less the total of all cash paid out as winnings to patrons including a provision for uncollectible gaming receivables as is further set forth in the Riverboat Gambling Act. The IGC may, from time to time, impose other fees and assessments on riverboat owner licensees. In addition, all use, excise and retail taxes apply to sales aboard riverboats. Excursions. Generally, gaming may not be conducted while a riverboat is docked, other than during the 30-minute periods for passenger embarkation and disembarkation. The Riverboat Gambling Act provides an exception if weather conditions or water conditions present a danger to the riverboat. In October 1994, the U.S. Attorney General's Office in Indiana notified the IGC that a federal law passed in 1951, commonly known as the Johnson Act, prohibits gaming vessels from cruising within federal maritime jurisdiction and prohibits gaming on such vessels. The Department of Justice has expressed concern that the Johnson Act may prohibit gaming on vessels on the Great Lakes because it has contended that the Great Lakes are within federal maritime jurisdiction. Management understands that the Department of Justice is still considering the issue, however, and has not reached a definitive conclusion. Currently, Congress has legislation pending that contains a related amendment to the Johnson Act. The Coast Guard Authorization bill, which contains a provision that would amend the Johnson Act specifically to allow gaming on vessels in the Indiana waters of Lake Michigan, was passed by the House of Representatives. The Senate-passed version of the Coast Guard Authorization bill does not contain a similar provision. Because the House of Representatives and the Senate passed different versions of the Coast Guard Authorization bill, a conference committee composed of House and Senate members is expected to be formed later in the Second Session of the 104th Congress (1996) to resolve differences in these versions. In 1995, the Indiana General Assembly adopted two differing amendments to the Riverboat Gambling Act permitting gambling to be conducted while a riverboat is docked under certain conditions. One of the amendments included an express provision allowing gambling to be conducted while a riverboat is docked if a determination is made that a condition exists that would cause a violation of federal law if the riverboat were to cruise. The other amendment did not include that express provision. The IGC has determined that the two amendments can be harmonized in a way that would permit gambling while a riverboat is docked if cruising would be a violation of federal law. Notwithstanding the IGC's determination, there can be no assurance that commencement of gaming operations by Trump Indiana while the riverboat is cruising would not be challenged as a violation of the Johnson Act or that commencement of gaming operations while the riverboat is docked would not be challenged as a violation of the Johnson Act or Indiana law. See "Risk Factors--The Indiana Riverboat". 104
424B1105th Page of 203TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 105th
Restricted Contracts. Under proposed IGC rules, no riverboat licensee or riverboat license applicant may enter into or perform any contract or transaction in which it transfers or receives consideration which is not commercially reasonable or which does not reflect the fair market value of the goods or services rendered or received as determined at the time the contract is executed. Any contract entered into by a riverboat licensee or riverboat license applicant that exceeds the total dollar amount of $50,000 shall be a written contract. A riverboat license applicant means an applicant for a riverboat owner's license that has been issued a certificate of suitability. Pursuant to IGC proposed rules, riverboat licensees and riverboat license applicants must submit an internal control procedure regarding purchasing transactions which must contain provisions regarding ethical standards, compliance with state and federal laws, and prohibitions on the acceptance of gifts and gratuities by purchasing and contracting personnel from suppliers of goods or services. The proposed rules also require any riverboat licensee or applicant to submit any contract, transaction, or series of transactions greater than $500,000 in any 12-month period to the IGC within 10 days of the execution, and to submit a summary of all contracts or transactions greater than $50,000 in any 12-month period on a quarterly basis. The proposed rules provide that contracts submitted to the IGC are not submitted for approval by the IGC, but grant the IGC authority to cancel or terminate any contract not in compliance with Indiana law and the IGC rules. Finance. Pursuant to IGC rules, any person (other than an institutional investor) acquiring 5% or more of any class of voting securities of a publicly traded corporation that owns a riverboat owner's license or 5% or more of the beneficial interest in a riverboat licensee, directly or indirectly, through any class of the voting securities of any holding or intermediary company of a riverboat licensee shall apply to the IGC for finding of suitability within 45 days after acquiring the securities. Each institutional investor who, individually or in association with others, acquires, directly or indirectly, 5% or more of any class of voting securities of a publicly-traded corporation that owns a riverboat owner's license or 5% or more of the beneficial interest in a riverboat licensee through any class of the voting securities of any holding or intermediary company of a riverboat licensee shall notify the IGC within 10 days after the institutional investor acquires the securities and shall provide additional information and may be subject to a finding of suitability as required by the IGC. Under IGC rules, an institutional investor who would otherwise be subject to a suitability finding shall, within 45 days after acquiring the interests, submit the following information: a description of the institutional investor's business and a statement as to why the institutional investor satisfies the definitional requirements of an institutional investor under Indiana gaming rule requirements; a certification made under oath that the voting securities were acquired and are held for investment purposes only and were acquired and are held in the ordinary course of business as an institutional investor; the name, address, telephone number, social security number or federal tax identification number of each person who has the power to direct or control the institutional investor's exercise of its voting rights as a holder of voting securities of the riverboat licensee; the name of each person who beneficially owns 5% or more of the institutional investor's voting securities or equivalent; a list of the institutional investor's affiliates; a list of all securities of the riverboat licensee that are or were beneficially owned by the institutional investor or its affiliates within the preceding one year; a disclosure of all criminal and regulatory sanctions imposed during the preceding ten years; a copy of any filing made under 16 U.S.C. 18(a); and any other additional information the IGC may request to insure compliance with Indiana gaming laws. Each institutional investor who, individually or in association with others, acquires, directly or indirectly, the beneficial ownership of 15% or more of any class of voting securities of a publicly-traded corporation that owns a riverboat owner's license or 15% or more of the beneficial interest in a riverboat licensee through any class of voting securities of any holding company or intermediary company of a riverboat licensee shall apply to the IGC for a finding of suitability within 45 days after acquiring the securities. The Certificate of Incorporation provides that the Company may redeem any shares of the Company's capital stock held by any person or entity whose holding of shares may cause the loss or nonreinstatement of a governmental license held by the Company. As defined in the Certificate of Incorporation, such redemption shall be at the lesser of the market price of the stock or the price at which the stock was purchased. 105
424B1106th Page of 203TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 106th
Under IGC rules, an institutional investor means any of the following: a retirement fund administered by a public agency for the exclusive benefit of federal, state, or local public employees; an investment company registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940; a collective investment trust organized by banks under Part 9 of the Rules of the Comptroller of the Currency; a closed end investment trust; a chartered or licensed life insurance company or property and casualty insurance company; a banking, chartered or licensed lending institution; an investment adviser registered under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940; and any other entity the IGC determines constitutes an institutional investor. The IGC may in the future promulgate regulations with respect to the qualification of other financial backers, mortgagees, bond holders, holders of indentures, or other financial contributors. Minority and Women Business Participation. Indiana gaming laws provide that the opportunity for full minority and women's business enterprise participation in the riverboat industry in Indiana is essential to social and economic parity for minority and women business persons. The IGC has the power to review compliance with the goals of participation by minority and women business persons and impose appropriate conditions on licensees to insure that goals for such business enterprises are met. Under Indiana gaming laws, a riverboat licensee or a riverboat license applicant shall designate certain minimum percentages of the value of its contracts for goods and services to be expended with minority business enterprises and women's business enterprises such that 10% of the dollar value of the riverboat licensee's or the riverboat license applicant's contracts be expended with minority business enterprises and 5% of the dollar value of the riverboat licensee's or the riverboat license applicant's contracts be expended with women's business enterprises. Expenditures with minority and women's business enterprises are not mutually exclusive. IGC Action. All licensees subject to the jurisdiction of the IGC have a continuing duty to maintain suitability for licensure. The IGC may initiate an investigation or disciplinary action or both against a licensee whom the commission has reason to believe is not maintaining suitability for licensure, is not complying with licensure conditions, and/or is not complying with Indiana gaming laws or regulations. The IGC may suspend, revoke, restrict, or place conditions on the license of a licensee; require the removal of a licensee or an employee of a licensee; impose a civil penalty or take any other action deemed necessary by the IGC to insure compliance with Indiana gaming laws. CLEAN WATER REGULATIONS Operation of the Indiana Riverboat must be in conformance with state and federal clean water requirements, including the Federal Water Pollution Control Act and the Oil Pollution Act of 1990 ("OPA"). OPA establishes an extensive regulatory and liability regime for the protection and cleanup of the environment from oil spills and affects all owners and operators whose vessels operate in United States waters, which include the Great Lakes. OPA requires vessel owners and operators to establish and maintain with the U.S. Coast Guard evidence of financial responsibility sufficient to meet their potential liabilities under OPA. U.S. Coast Guard regulations also implement the financial responsibility requirements of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act by requiring evidence of financial responsibility in an amount of $300 per gross ton, in addition to any required under OPA. The Company and Trump Indiana are in the process of obtaining insurance coverage and a Certificate of Financial Responsibility as required by OPA. The Company and Trump Indiana expect that the insurance coverage obtained will be adequate to protect against liability that may arise under OPA. However, in the case of a catastrophic spill or a spill in a sensitive environment, there can be no assurance that such occurrence would not result in liability in excess of the insurance coverage. OTHER LAWS AND REGULATIONS The U.S. Department of the Treasury has adopted regulations pursuant to which a casino is required to file a report of each deposit, withdrawal, exchange of currency, gambling tokens or chips, or other payments or transfers by, through or to such casino which involve a transaction in currency of more than $10,000 per patron, per gaming day. Such reports are required to be made on forms prescribed by the Secretary of the Treasury and are filed with the Commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service (the "Service"). In addition, the Company and Taj Associates are each required to maintain detailed records (including the names, addresses, social security 106
424B1107th Page of 203TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 107th
numbers and other information with respect to its gaming customers) dealing with, among other items, the deposit and withdrawal of funds and the maintenance of a line of credit. In the past, the Service had taken the position that gaming winnings from table games by nonresident aliens were subject to a 30% withholding tax. The Service, however, subsequently adopted a practice of not collecting such tax. Recently enacted legislation exempts from withholding tax table game winnings by nonresident aliens, unless the Secretary of the Treasury determines by regulation that such collections have become administratively feasible. As the result of an audit conducted by the U.S. Department of the Treasury, Office of Financial Enforcement, Plaza Associates was alleged to have failed to timely file the "Currency Transaction Report by Casino" in connection with 65 individual currency transactions in excess of $10,000 during the period from October 31, 1986 to December 10, 1988. Plaza Associates paid a fine of $292,500 in connection with these violations. Plaza Associates has revised its internal control procedures to ensure continued compliance with these regulations. From 1992 through 1995, the Service conducted an audit of "Currency Transaction Reports by Casino" filed by Taj Associates for the period from April 2, 1990 through December 31, 1991. The U.S. Department of Treasury has received a report detailing the audit as well as the response of Taj Associates. Recently, as a result of the audit of Taj Associates, the U.S. Department of Treasury has notified Taj Associates that it failed to timely file the "Currency Transaction Report by Casino" in connection with 173 individual currency transactions. The U.S. Department of Treasury has indicated in their notification that the matter can be resolved by the payment of a penalty which is significantly lower than the maximum penalty allowed by law. Management believes that any such amounts will not be material to the Company. The Indiana Riverboat site is located near, or adjacent to and may include protected wetlands which may subject the Company to obligations or liabilities in connection with wetlands mitigation or protection. On April 5, 1994, OSHA proposed a regulation that would require, inter alia, that employers who permit smoking in workplaces establish designated smoking areas, permit smoking only in such areas, and assure that designated smoking areas be enclosed, exhausted directly to the outside, and maintained under negative pressure sufficient to contain tobacco smoke within the designated area. Plaza Associates has estimated construction costs to build enclosed, exhausted, negative-pressure smoking rooms in Trump Plaza to be $1.5 million for its casino and $2.5 million for its restaurants. Plaza Associates has also estimated construction costs to provide negative-pressure exhaust systems for Trump Plaza hotel rooms to be $1,500 per room; however, management believes that it is highly unlikely that the regulation, if promulgated, would require hotel rooms to be equipped with exhaust systems if smoking is prohibited in the rooms during housekeeping and maintenance activities. If the regulation is promulgated and is applicable to Trump Plaza hotel rooms, the number of rooms that would be affected is not known at this time. Taj Associates is unable to estimate the cost, if any, of compliance with these proposed regulations and is unable to determine if the cost, if any, of such compliance would have a material adverse effect on Taj Associates. The Company and Taj Associates are subject to other federal, state and local regulations and, on a periodic basis, must obtain various licenses and permits, including those required to sell alcoholic beverages in the State of New Jersey as well as in other jurisdictions. Management of the Company and Taj Holding believe all required licenses and permits necessary to conduct the business of the Company and Taj Associates have been obtained for operations in the State of New Jersey. The Company expects to be subject to similar rigorous regulatory standards in each other jurisdiction in which it seeks to conduct gaming operations. There can be no assurance that regulations adopted, permits required or taxes imposed by other jurisdictions will permit profitable operations by the Company in those jurisdictions. In addition, the federal Merchant Marine Act, 1936 and the federal Shipping Act, 1916 and the applicable regulations thereunder contain provisions designed to prevent persons who are not citizens of the United States, as defined therein, from beneficially owning more than 25% of the capital stock of any entity operating a vessel on the Great Lakes. 107
424B1108th Page of 203TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 108th
MANAGEMENT DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS The following table sets forth certain information concerning each of the Company's directors and executive officers: [Enlarge/Download Table] NAME POSITION ---- -------- Donald J. Trump......... Chairman of the Board Nicholas L. Ribis....... President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Director Robert M. Pickus........ Executive Vice President and Secretary John P. Burke........... Senior Vice President of Corporate Finance and Corporate Treasurer Wallace B. Askins....... Director Don M. Thomas........... Director Peter M. Ryan........... Director Donald J. Trump--Mr. Trump, 49 years old, has been Chairman of the Board of the Company and THCR Funding since their formation in 1995. Mr. Trump is also Chairman of the Board of Directors, President and Treasurer of Plaza Funding, the managing general partner of Plaza Associates. Trump was a 50% shareholder, Chairman of the Board of Directors, President and Treasurer of Trump Plaza GP and the managing general partner of Plaza Associates prior to its merger into Plaza Funding in June 1993. Trump was Chairman of the Executive Committee and President of Plaza Associates from May 1986 to May 1992 and was a general partner of Plaza Associates until June 1993. Trump has been a director and President of Plaza Holding Inc. since February 1993 and was a partner in Trump AC from February 1993 until June 1995. Trump has been Chairman of the Board of Directors of Trump AC Funding since its formation in January 1996. Trump has been Chairman of the Board of Directors and a Class C Director of Taj Holding and TM/GP since October 1991; President and Treasurer of Taj Holding since March 4, 1991; Chairman of the Board of Directors, President and Treasurer of Taj Funding and TTMI since June 1988; sole director, President and Treasurer of TTMC since March 1991; Chairman of the Executive Committee of Taj Associates from June 1988 to October 1991; and President and sole Director of Realty Corp. since May 1986. Trump has been the sole director of Trump Indiana since its formation. Trump has been Chairman of the Board of Partner Representatives of TCA, the partnership that owns Trump's Castle, since May 1992; and was Chairman of the Executive Committee of TCA from June 1985 to May 1992. In addition, Trump is the managing general partner of TCA. Trump is also the President of The Trump Organization, which has been in the business, through its affiliates and subsidiaries, of acquiring, developing and managing real estate properties for more than the past five years. Trump was a member of the Board of Directors of Alexander's Inc. from 1987 to March 1992. Nicholas L. Ribis--Mr. Ribis, 51 years old, has been President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, and a director of the Company and THCR Funding and the Chief Executive Officer of THCR Holdings since their formation in 1995. Mr. Ribis has been the Chief Executive Officer of Plaza Associates since February 1991, was President from April 1994 to February 1995, was a member of the Executive Committee of Plaza Associates from April 1991 to May 29, 1992 and was a director and Vice President of Trump Plaza GP from May 1992 until its merger into Plaza Funding in June 1993. Mr. Ribis has been Vice President of Plaza Funding since February 1995 and Vice President of Plaza Holding Inc. since February 1995. Mr. Ribis has served as a director of Plaza Holding Inc. since June 1993 and of Plaza Funding since July 1993. Mr Ribis has been Chief Executive Officer, President and director of Trump AC Funding since its formation in January 1996. Mr. Ribis has been a Class C Director of TM/GP and Taj Holding since October 1991 and was Vice President of TM/GP and Taj Holding until June 1995; Chief Executive Officer of Taj Associates since February 1991; Vice President of Taj Funding since September 1991; Vice President of TTMI since February 1991 and Secretary of TTMI since September 1991; Director of Realty Corp. since October 1991; and a member of the Executive Committee of Taj Associates from April 1991 to October 1991. Mr. Ribis has been the President and Chief Executive Officer of Trump Indiana since its formation. He has also been Chief Executive Officer of TCA since March 1991; member of the Executive Committee of TCA from April 1991 to May 1992; member of the Board of Partner 108
424B1109th Page of 203TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 109th
Representatives of TCA since May 1992; and has served as the Vice President and Assistant Secretary of Trump's Castle Hotel & Casino, Inc., an entity beneficially owned by Trump, since December 1993 and January 1991, respectively. Mr. Ribis has served as Vice President of TC/GP, Inc. since December 1993 and had served as Secretary of TC/GP, Inc. from November 1991 to May 1992. Mr. Ribis has been Vice President of Trump Corp. since September 1991. From January 1993 to January 1995, Mr. Ribis served as the Chairman of the Casino Association of New Jersey and has been a member of the Board of Trustees of the CRDA since October 1993. From January 1980 to January 1991, Mr. Ribis was Senior Partner in, and from February 1991 to December 1995, was Counsel to, the law firm of Ribis, Graham & Curtin (now practicing as Graham, Curtin & Sheridan, A Professional Association), which serves as New Jersey legal counsel to all of the above-named companies and certain of their affiliated entities. Robert M. Pickus--Mr. Pickus, 41 years old, has been Executive Vice President and Secretary of the Company since its formation in 1995. He has also been the Executive Vice President of Corporate and Legal Affairs of Plaza Associates since February 1995. From December 1993 to February 1995, Mr. Pickus was the Senior Vice President and General Counsel of Plaza Associates and, since April 1994, he has been the Vice President and Assistant Secretary of Plaza Funding and Assistant Secretary of Plaza Holding Inc. Mr. Pickus has been Secretary and a director of Trump AC Funding since its formation in January 1996. Mr. Pickus has been the Executive Vice President of Corporate and Legal Affairs of Taj Associates since February 1995, and a Class C Director of Taj Holding and TM/GP since November 1995. Mr. Pickus has been the Executive Vice President and Secretary of Trump Indiana since its formation. He was the Senior Vice President and Secretary of Trump's Castle Funding, Inc. from June 1988 to December 1993 and General Counsel of TCA from June 1985 to December 1993. Mr. Pickus was also Secretary of Trump's Castle Hotel & Casino, Inc., an entity beneficially owned by Trump, from October 1991 until December 1993. Mr. Pickus has been the Executive Vice President of Corporate and Legal Affairs of TCA since February 1995 and a member of the Board of Partner Representatives of TCA since October 1995. John P. Burke--Mr. Burke, 48 years old, has been Senior Vice President of Corporate Finance of the Company, THCR Holdings and THCR Funding since January 1996, and has been the Corporate Treasurer of the Company, THCR Holdings and THCR Funding since their formation in 1995. He has also been Corporate Treasurer of Plaza Associates and Taj Associates since October 1991. Mr. Burke has been Treasurer of Trump AC since its formation in January 1996. Mr. Burke has been a Class C Director of TM/GP and Taj Holding since October 1991 and was Vice President of TM/GP until June 1995. Mr. Burke has been the Treasurer of Trump Indiana since its formation. Mr. Burke has been the Corporate Treasurer of TCA since October 1991, the Vice President of TCA, Trump's Castle Funding, Inc., TC/GP and Trump's Castle Hotel & Casino, Inc. since December 1993, and the Vice President-Finance of The Trump Organization since September 1990. Mr. Burke was an Executive Vice President and Chief Administrative Officer of Imperial Corporation of America from April 1989 through September 1990. Wallace B. Askins--Mr. Askins, 65 years old, has been a director of the Company and THCR Funding since June 1995. He has also been a director of Plaza Funding and Plaza Holding Inc. since April 11, 1994, and was a partner representative of the Board of Partner Representatives of TCA from May 1992 to June 1995. Mr. Askins served as a director of TC/GP from May 1992 to December 1993. From June 1984 to November 1992, Mr. Askins served as Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and as a director of Armco Inc. Mr. Askins also serves as a director of EnviroSource, Inc. Don M. Thomas--Mr. Thomas, 65 years old, has been a director of the Company and THCR Funding since June 1995. He has also been the Senior Vice President of Corporate Affairs of the Pepsi-Cola Bottling Co. of New York since January 1985. Mr. Thomas was the Acting Chairman, and a Commissioner, of the CRDA from 1985 through 1987, and a Commissioner of the CCC from 1980 through 1984. Mr. Thomas was a director of Trump Plaza GP until its merger into Plaza Funding in June 1993 and has been a director of Plaza Funding and Plaza Holding Inc. since June 1993. Mr. Thomas is an attorney licensed to practice law in the State of New York. 109
424B1110th Page of 203TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 110th
Peter M. Ryan--Mr. Ryan, 58 years old, has been a director of the Company and THCR Funding since June 1995. He has also been the President of each of The Marlin Group, LLC and The Brookwood Carrington Fund, LLC, real estate financial advisory groups, since January 1995. Prior to that, Mr. Ryan was the Senior Vice President of The Chase Manhattan Bank for more than five years. Mr. Ryan has been a director of the Childrens Hospital FTD since October 1995. The officers of the Company serve at the pleasure of the Board of Directors. All of the persons listed above are citizens of the United States and are qualified or licensed by the CCC. Trump and Nicholas L. Ribis served as either executive officers and/or directors of Taj Associates and its affiliated entities when such parties filed their petition for reorganization under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code on July 17, 1991. The Second Amended Joint Plan of Reorganization of such parties was confirmed on August 28, 1991, and was declared effective on October 4, 1991. Trump, Nicholas L. Ribis, John P. Burke and Robert M. Pickus also served as Executive Committee members, officers and/or directors of TCA and its affiliated entities at the time such parties filed a petition for reorganization under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code on March 9, 1992. The First Amended Joint Plan of Reorganization of such parties was confirmed on May 5, 1992, and was declared effective on May 29, 1992. Trump, Nicholas L. Ribis and John P. Burke served as either executive officers and/or directors of Plaza Associates and its affiliated entities when such parties filed their petition for reorganization under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code in March 1992. The First Amended Joint Plan of Reorganization of such parties was confirmed on April 30, 1992, and was declared effective on May 29, 1992. Trump was a partner of Plaza Operating Partners Ltd. when it filed a petition for reorganization under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code on November 2, 1992. The plan of reorganization for Plaza Operating Partners Ltd. was confirmed on December 11, 1992 and declared effective in January 1993. The Company is the general partner of THCR Holdings. As the sole general partner of THCR Holdings, the Company generally has the exclusive rights, responsibilities and discretion in the management and control of THCR Holdings. Upon consummation of the Merger Transaction, TM/GP will also be a limited partner of THCR Holdings. See "Description of the THCR Holdings Partnership Agreement." MANAGEMENT OF TRUMP PLAZA Plaza Funding is, and until the consummation of the Merger Transaction will remain, the managing general partner of Plaza Associates. The Board of Directors of each of Plaza Funding and Plaza Holding Inc. consists of Messrs. Trump, Ribis, Wallace B. Askins and Don M. Thomas. The Plaza Note Indenture requires that two directors of each of Plaza Funding and Plaza Holding Inc. be persons who would qualify as "Independent Directors" as such term is defined by the rules of the American Stock Exchange ("Amex") (the "Independent Directors"). The Amex rules define "independent directors" as those who are not officers of the company, neither related to its officers nor represent concentrated family holdings of its shares and who, in view of the company's board of directors, are free of any relationship that would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment. Set forth below are the names, ages, positions and offices held with Plaza Funding and Plaza Associates and a brief account of the business experience during the past five years of each of the executive officers of Plaza Funding and Plaza Associates other than those who are also directors or executive officers of the Company. Barry J. Cregan--Mr. Cregan, 41 years old, has been Chief Operating Officer of Plaza Associates since September 19, 1994 and President since March 1995. Since February 21, 1995, Mr. Cregan has been Vice President of Plaza Funding and Plaza Holding Inc. Prior to accepting these positions at Trump Plaza, Mr. Cregan was President of The Plaza Hotel in New York for approximately three years. Prior to joining The Plaza Hotel, he was Vice President of Hotel Operations at Trump's Castle in Atlantic City. In addition, Mr. Cregan has 110
424B1111th Page of 203TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 111th
worked for Hilton and Hyatt in executive capacities as well as working in Las Vegas and Atlantic City in executive capacities. Francis X. McCarthy, Jr.--Mr. McCarthy, 43 years old, was Vice President of Finance and Accounting of Trump Plaza GP from October 1992 until June 1993, the date of Trump Plaza GP's merger into Plaza Funding, was Senior Vice President of Finance and Administration of Plaza Associates from August 1990 to June 1994 and has been Executive Vice President of Finance and Administration since June 1994; Chief Accounting Officer of Plaza Funding since May 1992; Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Plaza Funding since July 1992 and Assistant Treasurer of Plaza Funding since March 1991. Mr. McCarthy previously served in a variety of financial positions for Greate Bay Hotel and Casino, Inc. from June 1980 through August 1990. Fred A. Buro--Mr. Buro, 39 years old, has been the Senior Vice President of Marketing of Plaza Associates since May 1994. Mr. Buro previously served as the President of Casino Resources, Inc., a casino marketing, management and development organization from 1991 through 1994. Prior to that, Mr. Buro served from 1984 through 1991 as the President of a professional services consulting firm. James A. Rigot--Mr. Rigot, 44 years old, has been Executive Vice President of Casino Operations of Plaza Associates since November 1994. Mr. Rigot served as Vice President of Casino Operations of TropWorld Casino and Entertainment Resort from July 1989 through November 1994. From January 1989 through July 1989, Mr. Rigot was Assistant Casino Manager of Resorts Casino Hotel. Kevin S. Smith--Mr. Smith, 39 years old, has been the Vice President, General Counsel of Plaza Associates since February 1995. Mr. Smith was previously associated with Cooper Perskie April Niedelman Wagenheim & Levenson, an Atlantic City law firm specializing in trial litigation. From 1989 until February 1992, Mr. Smith handled criminal trial litigation for the State of New Jersey, Department of Public Defender, assigned to the Cape May and Atlantic County Conflict Unit. Patrick J. O'Malley--Mr. O'Malley, 41 years old, has been the Executive Vice President of Hotel Operations of Plaza Associates since September 1995. Prior to joining Trump Plaza, from September 1994 until September 1995, Mr. O'Malley was President of The Plaza Hotel in New York City. From December 1989 until September 1994, Mr. O'Malley was the Vice President of Finance of the Plaza Hotel in New York City. Prior to joining the Plaza Hotel in New York City, from 1986 to 1989, Mr. O'Malley was a Regional Financial Controller for the Four Seasons Hotel and Resorts, Ltd. From 1979 to 1986, Mr. O'Malley worked in the Middle East and Europe as Hotel Controller for Marriot International Hotels. Steven C. Hann--Mr. Hann, 39 years old, has been the Executive Vice President of Casino Sales and Marketing of Plaza Associates since May 1995. Prior to joining Trump Plaza, Mr. Hann served in various marketing positions at the Sands Hotel and Casino since 1989, most recently Vice President of Casino Marketing and previously as Director of Casino Credit for Greate Bay Hotel and Casino. All of the persons listed above are citizens of the United States and are qualified or licensed by the CCC. MANAGEMENT OF THE TAJ MAHAL Until the consummation of the Merger Transaction, TM/GP will be the managing general partner of Taj Associates. Set forth below are the names, ages, positions and offices, and a brief account of the business experience during the past five years, of each of the executive officers of Taj Holding and key employees of Taj Associates other than those who are also directors or executive officers of the Company. 111
424B1112th Page of 203TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 112th
R. Bruce McKee--Mr. McKee, 50 years old, has been acting Chief Operating Officer of Taj Associates since October 1995; Senior Vice President, Finance of Taj Associates since July 1993; Vice President, Finance of Taj Associates from September 1990 through June 1993; Assistant Treasurer of Taj Funding, TM/GP, Taj Holding, Realty Corp., TTMC and TTMI since September 1991; Vice President of Finance of Elsinore Shore Associates, the owner and operator of the Atlantis Casino Hotel, Atlantic City, from April 1984 to September 1990; and Treasurer of Elsinore Finance Corp., Elsinore of Atlantic City and Elsub Corp. from June 1986 to September 1990. The Atlantis Casino Hotel now constitutes the portion of Trump Plaza known as Trump World's Fair. Nicholas F. Moles--Mr. Moles, 42 years old, has been Assistant Secretary of Taj Holding and TM/GP from October 1991 to February 1995; Secretary of Taj Holding and TM/GP since February 1995; Senior Vice President, Law of Taj Associates since January 1989 and General Counsel of Taj Associates since June 1993; Assistant Secretary of Taj Funding since September 1991, and Assistant Secretary of TTMI since January 1989. From May 1986 to May 1988, Mr. Moles was General Counsel of Plaza Associates and was Vice President and General Counsel of Plaza Associates from May 1988 to December 1988. Mr. Moles was Vice President and General Counsel of Elsinore Shore Associates from May 1985 to May 1986 and was Director and Assistant Secretary of Elsinore Finance Corporation from November 1985 to May 1986. Larry W. Clark--Mr. Clark, 52 years old, has been Executive Vice President, Casino Operations of Taj Associates since November 1991; Senior Vice President, Casino Operations of Taj Associates from May 1991 to November 1991; Vice President, Casino Administration of Taj Associates from April 1991 to May 1991; and was Vice President, Casino Operations, Dunes Hotel & Country Club from November 1990 to April 1991. Rudolfo E. Prieto--Mr. Prieto, 52 years old, has been Executive Vice President, Operations of Taj Associates since December 1995. Prior to joining the Taj Mahal, Mr. Prieto was Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer for Elsinore Corporation from May 1995 to November 1995; Senior Vice President in charge of the development of the Mojave Valley Resort for Elsinore Corporation from December 1994 to April 1995 and Executive Vice President and Assistant General Manager for the Tropicana Resort and Casino from May 1988 to November 1994. Walter Kohlross--Mr. Kohlross, 54 years old, has been Senior Vice President, Food & Beverage of Taj Associates since June 1992 and Vice President International Marketing of Taj Associates from June 1993 through October 1995; Vice President, Hotel Operations of Taj Associates from June 1991 to June 1992, and was Vice President, Food & Beverage of Taj Associates from 1988 to June 1991. Nicholas J. Niglio--Mr. Niglio, 49 years old, has been Senior Vice President, Casino Marketing of Taj Associates since November 1995. From February 1995 to October 1995, Mr. Niglio was Vice President, International Marketing of Taj Associates. Prior to joining Taj Associates, Mr. Niglio was Executive Vice President of International Marketing/Player Development for TCA, the partnership that owns and operates Trump's Castle from 1993 until 1995. Prior to that, Mr. Niglio served as Senior Vice President, Marketing of Caesar's World Marketing Corporation from 1991 until 1993. All of the persons listed above are citizens of the United States and are qualified or licensed by the CCC. Trump, Nicholas L. Ribis, John P. Burke, R. Bruce McKee, Nicholas F. Moles, Larry W. Clark and Walter Kohlross served as either executive officers and/or directors of Taj Associates and its affiliated entities when such parties filed their petition for reorganization under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code on July 17, 1991. The Second Amended Joint Plan of Reorganization of such parties was confirmed on August 28, 1991, and was declared effective on October 4, 1991. Trump, Nicholas L. Ribis, John P. Burke and Robert M. Pickus served as Executive Committee members, officers and/or directors of TCA and its affiliated entities at the time such parties filed a petition for reorganization under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code on March 9, 1992. The First 112
424B1113th Page of 203TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 113th
Amended Joint Plan of Reorganization of such parties was confirmed on May 5, 1992, and was declared effective on May 29, 1992. Trump, Nicholas L. Ribis and John P. Burke served as either executive officers and/or directors of Plaza Associates and its affiliated entities when such parties filed their petition for reorganization under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code in March 1992. The First Amended Joint Plan of Reorganization of such parties was confirmed on April 30, 1992, and was declared effective on May 29, 1992. Trump was a partner of Plaza Operating Partners Ltd. when it filed a petition for reorganization under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code on November 2, 1992. The plan of reorganization for Plaza Operating Partners Ltd. was confirmed on December 11, 1992 and declared effective in January 1993. Rudolfo E. Prieto was an Executive Vice President and the Chief Operating Officer for Elsinore Corporation when it filed a petition for reorganization under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code on October 31, 1995. Elsinore Corporation filed a plan of reorganization on February 28, 1996. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION General. Because the Company was formed in 1995, there was no salary or bonus paid to, deferred or accrued for the benefit of, the Company's Chief Executive Officer or any of the four remaining most highly compensated executive officers (whose annual salary and bonus exceeded $100,000 for the year ended December 31, 1995 (collectively, the "Executive Group")) by the Company or THCR Holdings prior to or during the fiscal year ended December 31, 1994. Similarly, no member of the Executive Group received any other annual compensation, restricted stock awards, stock options, stock appreciation rights ("SARs"), long-term incentive performance ("LTIP") payouts or other compensation from the Company or THCR Holdings prior to or for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1994. All cash compensation paid to the Executive Group in respect of services provided to the Company since its inception was paid and will continue to be paid by THCR Holdings in accordance with the THCR Holdings Partnership Agreement. See "Description of the THCR Holdings Partnership Agreement." 1995 Stock Incentive Plan. The Board of Directors of the Company adopted the 1995 Stock Incentive Plan (the "1995 Stock Plan"), pursuant to which, directors, employees and consultants of the Company and certain of its subsidiaries and affiliates who have been selected as participants are eligible to receive awards of various forms of equity-based incentive compensation, including stock options, stock appreciation rights, stock bonuses, restricted stock awards, performance units and phantom stock, and awards consisting of combinations of such incentives. The 1995 Stock Plan is administered by the Stock Incentive Plan Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company (the "Stock Incentive Plan Committee"). Subject to the provisions of the 1995 Stock Plan, the Stock Incentive Plan Committee has sole discretionary authority to interpret the 1995 Stock Plan and to determine the type of awards to grant, when, if and to whom awards are granted, the number of shares covered by each award and the terms and conditions of the award. Options granted under the 1995 Stock Plan may be "incentive stock options" ("ISOs"), within the meaning of Section 422 of the Code, or nonqualified stock options ("NQSOs"). The vesting, exercisability and exercise price of the options are determined by the Stock Incentive Plan Committee when the options are granted, subject to a minimum price in the case of ISOs of the Fair Market Value (as defined in the 1995 Stock Plan) of the Common Stock on the date of grant and a minimum price in the case of NQSOs of the par value of Common Stock. In the discretion of the Stock Incentive Plan Committee, the option exercise price may be paid in cash or in shares of Common Stock or other property having a fair market value on the date of exercise equal to the option exercise price, or by delivering to the Company a copy of irrevocable instructions to a stockbroker to deliver promptly to the Company an amount of sale or loan proceeds sufficient to pay the exercise price. Except as provided by the Stock Incentive Plan Committee in an underlying stock option agreement, in the event of a Change of Control (as defined in the 1995 Stock Plan or in the stock option agreement), all options subject to such agreement will be fully exercisable. The 1995 Stock Plan permits the Stock Incentive Plan Committee to grant SARs, either alone or in connection with an option. A SAR entitles its holder to be paid an amount equal to the fair market value of Common Stock subject to the SAR on the date of exercise of the SAR, less the exercise price of the related stock option in the case of a SAR granted in connection with a stock option, or the fair market value of one 113
424B1114th Page of 203TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 114th
share of stock on the date the SAR was granted, in the case of a SAR granted independent of an option. Shares of Common Stock covered by a restricted stock award are issued to the recipient at the time the award is granted, but are subject to forfeiture in the event continued employment and/or other restrictions and conditions established by the Stock Incentive Plan Committee at the time the award is granted are not satisfied. Unless otherwise determined by the Stock Incentive Plan Committee, a recipient of a restricted stock award has the same rights as an owner of Common Stock, including the right to receive cash dividends and to vote the shares. A performance unit or phantom stock award provides for the future payment of cash or the issuance of shares of Common Stock to the recipient if continued employment and/or other performance objectives established by the Stock Incentive Plan Committee at the time of grant are attained. The 1995 Stock Plan also provides that performance unit and phantom stock awards may be settled in cash, in the discretion of the Stock Incentive Plan Committee and if indicated in the applicable award agreement, on each date on which shares of Common Stock covered by the awards would otherwise have been delivered or become unrestricted, in an amount equal to the fair market value of such shares on such date. Except as provided in a particular award agreement, in the event of a Change in Control (as defined in the 1995 Stock Plan), notwithstanding any vesting schedule with respect to an award of options, SARs, phantom stock units or restricted stock, such options or SARs will become immediately exercisable with respect to the shares subject to such option or SAR, and restrictions with respect to such phantom stock units or shares of restricted stock will immediately expire. In addition, payment will be made as determined by the Stock Incentive Plan Committee with respect to performance units. The 1995 Stock Plan also provides for the grant of unrestricted stock bonus awards. The Company has reserved 1,000,000 shares of Common Stock for issuance under the 1995 Stock Plan, provided, however, that in the event of changes in the outstanding stock or the capital structure of the Company, adjustments will be made by the Stock Incentive Plan Committee as to (i) the number, price or kind of a share of stock or other consideration subject to outstanding awards and (ii) the maximum number of shares of stock subject to all awards under the 1995 Stock Plan. In 1995, the Stock Incentive Plan Committee granted to Nicholas L. Ribis, under the 1995 Stock Plan: (a) a stock bonus award of 66,667 shares of Common Stock, which was fully vested when issued, (b) a phantom stock unit award of 66,666 units, entitling Mr. Ribis to receive 66,666 shares of Common Stock on June 12, 1997, subject to certain conditions and (c) an award of NQSOs entitling Mr. Ribis to purchase 133,333 shares of Common Stock, subject to certain conditions (including vesting at a rate of 20% per year over a five- year period). The options have an exercise price of $14.00 per share. 114
424B1115th Page of 203TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 115th
Summary Compensation Table. The following table sets forth information regarding compensation paid to or accrued by all the executive officers of the Company for each of the last three completed fiscal years. Compensation accrued during one year and paid in another is recorded under the year of accrual. Because the Company was formed in 1995, compensation for the years ended December 31, 1994 and 1993 reflect solely the compensation paid to or accrued by these individuals as executive officers of Plaza Associates and Taj Associates. Compensation for the year ended December 31, 1995 includes compensation paid to or accrued by these individuals as executive officers of the Company, Plaza Associates and Taj Associates. [Enlarge/Download Table] LONG TERM COMPENSATION ANNUAL COMPENSATION AWARDS ------------------------------------ -------------------------- RESTRICTED SECURITIES OTHER ANNUAL STOCK UNDERLYING ALL OTHER NAME AND PRINCIPAL POSITION YEAR SALARY BONUS COMPENSATION(1) AWARDS ($) OPTIONS ($) COMPENSATION --------------------------- ---- ---------- --------- --------------- ---------- ----------- ------------ Donald J. Trump......... 1995 $ 583,333 $ -- $ -- -- -- $3,064,000(/2/) Chairman of the Board 1994 -- -- -- -- -- 2,641,000(/2/)(/3/) 1993 -- -- -- -- -- 2,813,000(/2/) Nicholas L. Ribis(/4/).. 1995 $1,355,636 $ 933,338 $ -- 933,324(/5/) 133,333 $ -- Chief Executive Officer 1994 1,306,000 250,000 169,407 -- -- -- 1993 748,253 500,000 383,497 -- -- -- Robert M. Pickus........ 1995 $ 198,972 $ 85,000 $ -- -- -- $ 4,004(/6/) Executive Vice President 1994 163,759 32,500 -- -- -- 3,291(/6/) and Secretary 1993 5,808 -- -- -- -- -- John P. Burke........... 1995 $ 100,000 $ 51,666 $ -- -- -- $ -- Senior Vice President of 1994 100,000 -- 46,000 -- -- -- Corporate Finance and 1993 95,590 28,000 46,000 -- -- -- Corporate Treasurer --------------------- (1) Represents the dollar value of annual compensation not properly categorized as salary or bonus, including amounts reimbursed for income taxes. Following SEC (as defined) rules, perquisites and other personal benefits are not included in this table because the aggregate amount of that compensation is less than the lesser of $50,000 or 10% of the total of salary and bonus for each member of the Executive Group. (2) The amounts listed represent amounts paid to Trump and TPM, a corporation wholly owned by Trump, pursuant to the services agreements with Taj Associates and Plaza Associates, respectively. Payments received by TPM under the TPM Services Agreement are currently pledged by TPM to secure lease payments for a helicopter that TPM makes available to Plaza Associates. See "--Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation--Certain Related Party Transactions of Trump--Plaza Associates" and "--Taj Associates and Affiliates." Trump is neither an employee of Plaza Associates nor Taj Associates. (3) In addition to the amount listed as payments under the TPM Services Agreement and the Taj Services Agreement, during 1994, Plaza Associates paid to Trump an aggregate of $1,572,000 under a construction service agreement and as a commission to secure a retail lease at Trump Plaza. See Note 8 to Consolidated Financial Statements of Trump AC and Plaza Associates. (4) Mr. Ribis devotes a majority of his time to the affairs of the Company. See "--Employment Agreements." (5) As of December 31, 1995, Mr. Ribis also held 66,666 phantom stock units issued pursuant to the 1995 Stock Plan. These units had a value as of December 31, 1995 of $1,433,319. These phantom stock units were issued to Mr. Ribis in connection with his employment agreement with the Company. Each phantom stock unit entitles Mr. Ribis to one share of Common Stock on the vesting date of the phantom stock unit. All of the phantom stock units are scheduled to vest on June 12, 1997. Vesting will accelerate in the event of Mr. Ribis' termination of employment with the Company (i) because of his death or disability, (ii) by the Company without cause or (iii) voluntarily by Mr. Ribis under circumstances which constitute a constructive termination. Alternatively, the phantom stock units may expire prior to June 12, 1997 in the event Mr. Ribis voluntarily terminates his employment with the Company under circumstances which do not constitute constructive termination or if he is terminated by the Company with cause. Dividend equivalents with respect to the phantom stock units will be credited to a bookkeeping account on behalf of Mr. Ribis and will be paid out in cash at the time the phantom stock units vest or will expire along with the phantom stock units. (6) Represents vested and unvested contributions made by Plaza Associates to the Trump Plaza Hotel and Casino Retirement Savings Plan. Funds accumulated for an employee under this plan consisting of a certain percentage of the employee's compensation plus Plaza Associates' employer matching contributions equaling 50% of the participant's contributions, are retained until termination of employment, attainment of age 59 1/2 or financial hardship, at which time the employee may withdraw his or her vested funds. 115
424B1116th Page of 203TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 116th
The following table sets forth options granted to Mr. Ribis in 1995. No other member of the Executive Group received stock options in 1995. The Company did not issue any stock appreciation rights in 1995. This table also sets forth the hypothetical gains that would exist for the options at the end of their ten-year terms at assumed annual rates of stock price appreciation of 5% and 10%. The actual future value of the options will depend on the market value of the Common Stock, continued employment with the Company and other factors. OPTION GRANTS IN LAST FISCAL YEAR [Enlarge/Download Table] POTENTIAL REALIZED VALUE AT ASSUMED ANNUAL RATES OF INDIVIDUAL STOCK APPRECIATION GRANTS FOR OPTION TERM ----------------------------------------------------- --------------------- NUMBER OF % OF TOTAL SECURITIES OPTIONS UNDERLYING GRANTED EXERCISE OR OPTIONS TO EMPLOYEES BASE PRICE EXPIRATION NAME GRANTED(#) IN FISCAL YEAR ($/SH) DATE 5%($) 10%($) ---- ---------- -------------- ----------- ------------- ---------- ---------- Nicholas L. Ribis....... 133,333(1) 100% $14.00 June 12, 2005 $1,173,060 $2,960,580 --------------------- (1) The options vest at the rate of 20% per year on each anniversary of the date of the grant subject to acceleration in certain circumstances. See "--Employment Agreements." The following table sets forth the number of shares covered by options held by Mr. Ribis and the value of the options as of December 31, 1995. Mr. Ribis was the only member of the Executive Group who held options in 1995. None of these options were exercisable in 1995. FY-END OPTION VALUE [Download Table] NUMBER OF SECURITIES VALUE OF UNEXERCISED UNDERLYING UNEXERCISED IN-THE-MONEY OPTIONS AT FY-END(#) OPTIONS AT FY-END ($)(1) -------------------------- -------------------------- NAME EXERCISABLE/ UNEXERCISABLE EXERCISABLE/ UNEXERCISABLE ---- ------------ ------------- ------------ ------------- Nicholas L. Ribis........ N/A 133,333 N/A $2,866,660 --------------------- (1) Based on a closing price of $21 1/2 per share of Common Stock on December 31, 1995. EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENTS Trump serves as the Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Company pursuant to the Executive Agreement dated as of June 12, 1995, among Trump, the Company and THCR Holdings (the "Executive Agreement"). In consideration for Trump's services under the Executive Agreement, Trump receives a salary of $1 million per year. Pursuant to the terms of the Executive Agreement, Trump provides to the Company, from time to time, when reasonably requested, marketing, advertising, professional and other similar and related services with respect to the operation and business of the Company. The Executive Agreement continues in effect (i) for an initial term of five years, and (ii) thereafter, for a three-year rolling term until either Trump or the Company provides notice to the other of its election not to continue extending the term, in which case the term of the Executive Agreement will end three years from the date such notice is given. The Executive Agreement also provides that Trump may devote time and effort to the Taj Mahal and Trump's Castle and, subject to the terms of the Contribution Agreement, to other business matters, and that the Executive Agreement will not be construed to restrict Trump from operating the Taj Mahal and Trump's Castle in a commercially reasonable manner and/or having an interest therein or conducting any other activity not prohibited under the Contribution Agreement. See "Risk Factors--Conflicts of Interest" and "Description of the THCR Holdings Partnership Agreement-- Contribution Agreement." Plaza Associates had an employment agreement with Nicholas L. Ribis (the "Ribis Plaza Agreement") pursuant to which Mr. Ribis acted as Chief Executive Officer of Plaza Associates. The Ribis Plaza Agreement 116
424B1117th Page of 203TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 117th
provided for an annual salary of $550,000 with annual increases of 10% on each anniversary. Mr. Ribis received a $250,000 signing bonus. Pursuant to the terms of the Ribis Plaza Agreement, in the event Plaza Associates engaged in an offering of common shares to the public, Plaza Associates and Mr. Ribis would agree to negotiate new compensation arrangements to include equity participation for Mr. Ribis. As a result of the June 1995 Offerings, the Company and THCR Holdings entered into a revised employment agreement with Mr. Ribis (the "Revised Ribis Plaza Agreement") to replace the Ribis Plaza Agreement, pursuant to which he agreed to serve as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company and Chief Executive Officer of THCR Holdings. The term of the Revised Ribis Plaza Agreement is five years and Mr. Ribis is required to devote not less than 50% of his professional time to the affairs of the Company, as measured on a quarterly basis, based on a 40-hour work week. Under the Revised Ribis Plaza Agreement, Mr. Ribis's annual salary is $998,250, which is 50% of the aggregate current annual base salary ($1,996,500) that Mr. Ribis receives as Chief Executive Officer of the Company ($998,250), Taj Mahal ($499,125) and Trump's Castle ($499,125). Following the consummation of the Merger Transaction, Mr. Ribis will devote 75% of his professional time to the operations of the Company, Plaza Associates and Taj Associates, and his annual salary will be $1,497,375 per year with respect to his services to these entities. Mr. Ribis will continue to receive $499,125 per year with respect to his services to Trump's Castle. In 1995, the Stock Incentive Plan Committee granted to Mr. Ribis, under the 1995 Stock Plan: (a) a stock bonus award of 66,667 shares of Common Stock, which was fully vested when issued, (b) a phantom stock unit award of 66,666 units, entitling him to receive 66,666 shares of Common Stock on June 12, 1997, subject to certain conditions and (c) an award of NQSOs entitling Mr. Ribis to purchase 133,333 shares of the Common Stock (and associated registration rights) at an exercise price of $14.00 per share. The options will vest at the rate of 20% per year over a five-year period and be subject to certain other conditions. In the event Mr. Ribis's employment is terminated by the Company other than for "cause" or if he incurs a "constructive termination without cause," Mr. Ribis will receive a severance payment equal to one year's base salary, and the phantom stock units and options will become fully vested. The Revised Ribis Plaza Agreement defines (a) "cause" as Mr. Ribis's (i) conviction of certain crimes, (ii) gross negligence or willful misconduct in carrying out his duties, (iii) revocation of his casino key employee license or (iv) material breach of the agreement, and (b) "constructive termination without cause" as the termination of Mr. Ribis's employment at his initiative following the occurrence of certain events, including (i) a reduction in compensation, (ii) failure to elect Mr. Ribis as Chief Executive Officer or (iii) failure to elect Mr. Ribis a director of the Company or (iv) a material diminution of his duties. The phantom stock units will also automatically vest upon the death or disability of Mr. Ribis. The Revised Ribis Plaza Agreement also provides for up to an aggregate of $2.0 million of loans to Mr. Ribis to be used by him to pay his income tax liability in connection with stock options, phantom stock units and stock bonus awards, which loans will be forgiven, including both principal and interest, in the event of a "change of control." The Revised Ribis Plaza Agreement defines "change of control" as the occurrence of any of the following events: (i) any person (other than THCR Holdings, Trump or an affiliate of either) becomes a beneficial owner of 50% or more of the voting stock of the Company, (ii) the majority of the Board of Directors of the Company consists of individuals that were not directors on June 12, 1995 (the "June 12 Directors"), provided, however, that any person who becomes a director subsequent to June 12, 1995, shall be considered a June 12 Director if his election or nomination was supported by three-quarters of the June 12 Directors, (iii) the Company adopts and implements a plan of liquidation or (iv) all or substantially all of the assets or business of the Company are disposed of in a sale or business combination in which shareholders of the Company would not beneficially own the same proportion of voting stock of the successor entity. The Revised Ribis Plaza Agreement also provides certain demand and piggyback registration rights for Common Stock issued pursuant to the foregoing. Pursuant to the Revised Ribis Plaza Agreement, Mr. Ribis has agreed that upon termination of his employment other than for "cause" or following a "change of control," he would not engage in any activity competitive with the Company for a period of up to one year. Mr. Ribis also has an employment agreement with Taj Associates (the "Ribis Taj Agreement") pursuant to which Mr. Ribis acts as Chief Executive Officer of Taj Associates, the term of which expires on September 25, 1996. Mr. Ribis received a $250,000 signing bonus. Pursuant to the terms of the Ribis Taj Agreement, in the event that Taj Associates, or any entity which acquires substantially all of Taj Associates, proposes to engage in an offering of common shares to the public, Taj Associates and Mr. Ribis will negotiate new compensation 117
424B1118th Page of 203TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 118th
arrangements to include equity participation for Mr. Ribis. Taj Associates may at any time terminate Mr. Ribis's employment for "cause," which is defined in the Ribis Taj Agreement as Mr. Ribis's (i) conviction of a felony or (ii) revocation or termination of his casino key employee license issued by the CCC. Pursuant to the Ribis Taj Agreement, Mr. Ribis has agreed that upon termination of his employment for cause by Taj Associates or voluntarily by Mr. Ribis (other than following a material breach of the agreement by Taj Associates), he would not engage in employment for or on behalf of any other casino hotel located in Atlantic City for the lesser of one year or the period then remaining in the term of the agreement, provided that this covenant not to compete shall not be applicable in the case there is a public offering of common shares and Mr. Ribis voluntarily terminates his employment as the result of his and Taj Associates' failure to negotiate mutually satisfactory compensation arrangements. Taj Associates and Mr. Ribis expect to amend the Ribis Taj Agreement, retroactive to June 12, 1995, pursuant to which, among other things, Mr. Ribis's annual salary will change from $550,000 (with annual increases of 10% on each anniversary) to $499,125. Mr. Ribis is also Chief Executive Officer of TCA, the partnership that owns Trump's Castle, and receives compensation from this entity for such services as set forth above. Pursuant to the Revised Ribis Plaza Agreement, he is required to devote the majority of his time to the affairs of the Company, and following the consummation of the Merger Transaction, Mr. Ribis will devote approximately 75% of his professional time to the Company. All other executive officers of Plaza Associates, except Messrs. Burke and Pickus, devote substantially all of their time to the business of Plaza Associates. THCR Holdings has an employment agreement with Robert M. Pickus (the "Pickus Agreement") pursuant to which he serves as Executive Vice President and General Counsel. The Pickus Agreement, the initial term of which expires on July 9, 1998 if not extended, provides for annual compensation of $275,000 plus bonus. Employment may be terminated only for "cause," which is defined in the Pickus Agreement as Mr. Pickus's (i) revocation of his casino key employee license, (ii) conviction of certain crimes, (iii) disability or death or (iv) breach of his duty to THCR Holdings. Upon termination for cause, Mr. Pickus will receive only compensation earned to the date of termination. Pursuant to the Pickus Agreement, Mr. Pickus has agreed not to accept employment for or on behalf of any other casino hotel located in Atlantic City during the term of the Pickus Agreement. COMPENSATION OF DIRECTORS Directors of the Company who are also employees or consultants of the Company and its affiliates receive no directors' fees. Non-employee directors are paid an annual directors' fee of $50,000, plus $2,000 per meeting attended plus reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred in attending these meetings, provided that directors currently serving on the Board of Directors of Plaza Funding or Plaza Holding Inc. receive no additional compensation. All such fees are reimbursed to the Company by THCR Holdings in accordance with the THCR Holdings Partnership Agreement. COMMITTEES OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS The Company has an Executive Committee, an Audit Committee, a Special Committee, a Stock Incentive Plan Committee and a Compensation Committee. The Executive Committee is composed of Messrs. Trump and Ribis. The Audit Committee and the Special Committee are composed of Messrs. Askins, Ryan and Thomas, each of whom is an independent director of the Company. The Stock Incentive Plan Committee is composed of Messrs. Trump, Askins, Ryan and Thomas. The Compensation Committee is composed of Messrs. Trump, Ribis, Askins and Thomas. The Special Committee was established pursuant to the By-Laws and the THCR Holdings Partnership Agreement and is empowered to vote on any matters which require approval of a majority of the independent directors of the Company, including affiliated transactions. See "Description of the THCR Holdings Partnership Agreement." COMPENSATION COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION Trump and certain affiliates have engaged in certain related party transactions. See "Certain Transactions." In general, the compensation of executive officers of the Company is determined by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company, which consists of Messrs. Trump, Ribis, Askins and 118
424B1119th Page of 203TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 119th
Thomas. No officer or employee of the Company, other than Messrs. Trump and Ribis, who serve on the Board of Directors of the Company, participated in the deliberations of the Board of Directors of the Company concerning executive compensation. Certain Related Party Transactions of Trump--The Company. Trump entered into the Executive Agreement, the Contribution Agreement and the License Agreement in June 1995, and is currently the sole limited partner of THCR Holdings. See "--Employment Agreements," "Business--Trademark/Licensing" and "Description of the THCR Holdings Partnership Agreement." Upon consummation of the June 1995 Offerings, Trump contributed to the capital of Trump Indiana and other new jurisdiction subsidiaries payments made by him relating to expenditures for the development of the Indiana Riverboat and other gaming ventures. As of June 12, 1995 these advances totaled approximately $4.4 million. Of these amounts, approximately $3.0 million were used to fund expenses related to the development of Trump Indiana. In order to fund such expenses, THCR Holdings lent to Trump $3.0 million and Trump issued to THCR Holdings a five-year promissory note bearing interest at a fixed rate of 10%, payable annually. The promissory note provided that it would be automatically canceled in the event that at any time during the periods set forth below, the Common Stock traded on the NYSE, or any other applicable national exchange or over-the-counter market, at a price per share equal to or greater than the prices set forth below (subject to adjustment in certain circumstances) for any ten trading days during any 15 consecutive trading day period: [Download Table] If on or prior to June 12, 1997 ...................................... $25.00 If on or prior to June 12, 1998 ...................................... $27.50 If on or prior to June 12, 1999 ...................................... $30.00 If on or prior to June 12, 2000 ...................................... $32.50 On March 27, 1996, the $3.0 million promissory note was canceled in accordance with its terms. The Company has entered into a ten-year lease with The Trump-Equitable Fifth Avenue Company, a corporation wholly owned by Trump, dated as of July 1, 1995, for the lease of office space in The Trump Tower in New York City, which the Company may use for its general executive and administrative offices. The fixed rent is $115,500 per year, paid in equal monthly installments, for the period from July 1, 1995 to June 30, 2000, and will be $129,250 per year, paid in equal monthly installments, for the period from July 1, 2000 to June 30, 2005. In addition, the Company will pay as additional rent, among other things, a portion of the property taxes due each year. The Company has the option to terminate this lease upon ninety days' written notice and payment of $32,312.50. In connection with the Merger Transaction, Trump and the Company entered into an agreement, dated January 8, 1996, pursuant to which Trump agreed to take the actions contemplated to be taken by Trump in connection with the Merger Transaction, including to vote, or cause to be voted, all shares of Common Stock and Class B Common Stock beneficially owned by Trump in favor of the approval of the Merger Transaction. The Company agreed to use reasonable efforts to fulfill, and cause to be fulfilled, those obligations owed to Trump in connection with the Merger Transaction. Certain Related Party Transactions of Trump--Plaza Associates. Through February 1, 1993, Plaza Associates also leased from Trump approximately 120 parking spaces at Trump Plaza East for approximately $5.50 per parking space per day, with payments under such arrangement for the years ended December 31, 1993 and December 31, 1992 totaling $21,000 and $227,000, respectively. Seashore Four is the fee owner of a parcel of land constituting a portion of the Plaza Casino Parcel, which it leases to Plaza Associates pursuant to the SFA Lease. Seashore Four was assigned the lessor's interest in the existing SFA Lease in connection with its acquisition of fee title to such parcel from a non-affiliated third party 119
424B1120th Page of 203TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 120th
in November 1983. The SFA Lease was entered into by Plaza Associates with such third party on an arm's-length basis. Plaza Associates recorded rental expenses of approximately $950,000, $900,000 and $900,000 in 1995, 1994 and 1993, respectively, concerning rent owed to Seashore Four. Trump Seashore is the fee owner of a parcel of land constituting a portion of the Plaza Casino Parcel, which it leases to Plaza Associates pursuant to the TSA Lease. In July 1988, Trump Seashore exercised a $10 million option to purchase the fee title to such parcel from a non-affiliated third party. In connection therewith, Trump Seashore was assigned the lessors' interest in the Trump Seashore Lease, which interest has, however, been transferred to UST. See "Business--Properties." Plaza Associates made rental payments to Trump Seashore of approximately $1,175,000, $1.0 million and $1.0 million in 1995, 1994 and 1993, respectively. In June 1989, Trump Crystal Tower Associates Limited Partnership ("Trump Crystal"), a New Jersey limited partnership wholly owned by Trump, acquired from Elsinore Shore Associates all of the assets constituting the former Atlantis Casino Hotel ("Atlantis"), which is located on The Boardwalk adjacent to the Atlantic City Convention Center on the opposite side from Trump Plaza and is otherwise referred to herein as Trump World's Fair. Prior to such acquisition, all of the Atlantis' gaming operations were discontinued. The facility was renamed the Trump Regency Hotel and, in August 1990, pursuant to a triple net lease with an affiliate of Plaza Associates, leased to Plaza Associates, which operated it solely as a non-casino hotel. During such period of operation, losses attributable to the former Trump Regency Hotel aggregating approximately $14.1 million adversely affected the results of operations of Plaza Associates. Pursuant to the 1992 Plaza Restructuring, Plaza Associates ceased operating the former Trump Regency Hotel as of September 30, 1992. As part of the 1992 Plaza Restructuring, the triple-net lease was terminated and Plaza Associates issued to Manufacturers Hanover Trust Company, which has since been acquired by Chemical Bank ("Chemical"), the assignee of rents payable under such lease, a promissory note in the original principal amount of $17.5 million (the "Regency Note"). At such time, title to the former Trump Regency Hotel was transferred by Trump to ACFH Inc. ("ACFH"), a wholly owned subsidiary of Chemical. From that time until June 12, 1995, the former Trump Regency Hotel was operated on behalf of ACFH as a non- casino hotel by Sovereign Management, a third party unaffiliated with the Company, Trump or their respective affiliates. Pursuant to an agreement between Trump Crystal and ACFH, Trump Crystal granted ACFH a non-exclusive license to use the "Trump" name in connection with such property. Plaza Associates repaid the Regency Note with a portion of the proceeds from the sale of the Plaza Notes and PIK Notes. In December 1993, Trump entered into an option agreement (the "Original Chemical Option Agreement") with Chemical and ACFH. The Original Chemical Option Agreement granted to Trump an option to purchase (i) the former Trump Regency Hotel (including the land, improvements and personal property used in the operation of the hotel) and (ii) certain promissory notes (including a personal promissory note of Trump payable to Chemical for $35.9 million (the "Trump Note")) made by Trump and/or certain of his affiliates and payable to Chemical (the "Chemical Notes") which are secured by certain real estate assets located in New York, unrelated to Plaza Associates, including the Trump Note which was made by Trump on July 20, 1987. As of September 30, 1995, the aggregate amount owed by Trump and his affiliates under the Chemical Notes (none of which constitutes an obligation of Plaza Associates) was approximately $65.8 million. In connection with exercise of the Trump World's Fair Purchase Option, as discussed below, the Trump Note was canceled. The aggregate purchase price payable for the assets subject to the Original Chemical Option Agreement was $80 million. Under the terms of the Original Chemical Option Agreement, $1 million was required to be paid for the option by January 5, 1994. In addition, the Original Chemical Option Agreement provided for an expiration of the option on May 8, 1994, subject to an extension until June 30, 1994 upon payment of an additional $250,000 on or before May 8, 1994. The Original Chemical Option Agreement did not allocate the purchase price among the assets subject to the option or permit the option to be exercised for some, but not all, of such assets. 120
424B1121st Page of 203TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 121st
In connection with the execution of the Original Chemical Option Agreement, Plaza Associates was to make the initial $1 million payment, and, in consideration of such payment to be made by Plaza Associates, Trump agreed with Plaza Associates that, if Trump was able to acquire the former Trump Regency Hotel pursuant to the exercise of the option, he would make it available for the sole benefit of Plaza Associates on a basis consistent with Plaza Associates' contractual obligations and requirements. Trump further agreed that Plaza Associates would not be required to pay any additional consideration to Trump in connection with any assignment to Plaza Associates of the option to purchase the former Trump Regency Hotel. On January 5, 1994, Plaza Associates obtained the approval of the CCC to make the $1 million payment, and the payment was made on that date. On June 16, 1994, Trump, Chemical and ACFH amended and restated the Original Chemical Option Agreement (the "First Amended Chemical Option Agreement"). The First Amended Chemical Option Agreement provided for an extension of the expiration of the option through September 30, 1994, upon payment of $250,000. Such payment was made on June 27, 1994. The First Amended Chemical Option Agreement provided for a $60 million option price for the former Trump Regency Hotel and the Trump Note, and a separate $20 million option price for the other Chemical Notes. On August 30, 1994, Trump, Chemical and ACFH entered into an amendment to the First Amended Chemical Option Agreement (the "Second Amended Chemical Option Agreement"). The Second Amended Chemical Option Agreement provided for an extension of the expiration of the option through March 31, 1995 upon the payment of $50,000 a month for the period October through December 1994, and $150,000 a month for the period January through March 1995. Plaza Associates received the approval of the CCC and has made such payments. On March 6, 1995, Trump, Chemical and ACFH entered into an amendment to the Second Amended Chemical Option Agreement (the "Third Amended Chemical Option Agreement") or the Trump World's Fair Purchase Option. On June 12, 1995, Trump exercised the Trump World's Fair Purchase Option for $58,150,000 ($60 million less $1,850,000 in option payments which were available as of that date to offset the original exercise price), and title to Trump World's Fair was transferred via directed deed from ACFH to Plaza Associates. In connection with the exercise of the Trump World's Fair Purchase Option, the Trump Note was canceled. The Company is currently in the process of renovating and integrating Trump World's Fair into Trump Plaza. See "Business--Atlantic City Properties--Trump Plaza--The Trump Plaza Expansion." In 1993, Plaza Associates received the approval of the CCC, subject to certain conditions, for the expansion of its hotel facilities at Trump Plaza East. On June 24, 1993, in connection with the 1993 refinancing of Trump Plaza, (i) Trump transferred title to Trump Plaza East to Missouri Boardwalk, Inc. ("Boardwalk"), a wholly owned subsidiary of Midlantic National Bank ("Midlantic"), in exchange for a reduction in indebtedness to Midlantic in an amount equal to the sum of fair market value of Trump Plaza East and all rent payments made to Boardwalk by Trump under the Trump Plaza East Lease (as defined), (ii) Boardwalk leased Trump Plaza East to Trump (the "Trump Plaza East Lease") for a term of five years, which expires on June 30, 1998, during which time Trump was obligated to pay Boardwalk $260,000 per month in lease payments, and (iii) Plaza Associates acquired the Trump Plaza East Purchase Option. In October 1993, Plaza Associates assumed the Trump Plaza East Lease and related expenses. In addition, Plaza Associates has the Right of First Offer upon any proposed sale of all or any portion of the fee interest in Trump Plaza East during the term of the Trump Plaza East Purchase Option. Pursuant to the Right of First Offer, Plaza Associates has ten days after receiving written notice from the grantor of the proposed sale to commit to exercise the Right of First Offer. If Plaza Associates commits to exercise the Right of First Offer, it has ten days from the date of commitment to deposit $3,000,000 with the grantor, to be credited towards the purchase price or to be retained by the grantor if the closing, through no fault of the grantor, does not occur within 90 days (or, subject to certain conditions, 120 days) of the date of the commitment. If Plaza Associates determines not to timely exercise the Right of First Offer, the grantor thereof may sell Trump Plaza East to a third party, subject, however, to the Trump Plaza East Purchase Option and the lease associated with Trump Plaza East. Trump, individually, also has been granted by such lender the Right of First Offer upon a proposed sale of all or any portion of Trump Plaza East during the term of the Trump Plaza East Purchase Option. Trump has agreed with Plaza Associates that his Right of First Offer will be subject to Plaza Associates' prior exercise of its Right of First Offer (with any decision of Plaza Associates requiring the approval of the independent directors of Plaza Funding, acting as the managing general 121
424B1122nd Page of 203TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 122nd
partner of Plaza Associates). Acquisition of Trump Plaza East by Plaza Associates would under certain circumstances (provided there are no events of default under the Trump Plaza East Lease or the Trump Plaza East Purchase Option and provided that certain other events had not theretofore or do not thereafter occur) discharge Trump's approximately $18 million obligation to Midlantic in full. On June 24, 1993, Plaza Associates and TPM entered into the TPM Services Agreement which amended and restated an earlier services agreement. Pursuant to the TPM Services Agreement, TPM is required to provide to Plaza Associates, from time to time when reasonably requested, consulting services on a non- exclusive basis, relating to marketing, advertising, promotional and other similar and related services (the "TPM Services") with respect to the business and operations of Plaza Associates. In addition, the TPM Services Agreement contains a non-exclusive "license" of the "Trump" name. TPM is not required to devote any prescribed amount of time to the performance of its duties. In consideration for the TPM Services, Plaza Associates pays TPM an annual fee of $1.0 million in equal monthly installments. In addition to such annual fee, Plaza Associates reimburses TPM on a monthly basis for all reasonable out-of- pocket expenses incurred by TPM in performing its obligations under the TPM Services Agreement. Plaza Associates paid TPM $1,321,000, $1,288,000 and $1,247,000 in 1995, 1994 and 1993, respectively, for the TPM Services. Pursuant to the TPM Services Agreement, Plaza Associates has agreed to hold TPM, its officers, directors and employees harmless from and against any loss arising out of or in connection with the performance of the TPM Services and to hold Trump harmless from and against any loss arising out of the license of the "Trump" name. The TPM Services Agreement provides that its term is coextensive with the period during which any Plaza Notes remain outstanding. Payments received under the TPM Services Agreement are currently pledged by TPM to secure lease payments for a helicopter that TPM makes available to Plaza Associates. Pending approval by the lessor of the helicopter, it is currently contemplated that the stock of TPM will be transferred by Trump to THCR Holdings, which will in turn assume the lease and related obligations, as well as become entitled to all amounts payable under the TPM Services Agreement. John Barry, Trump's brother-in-law, is a partner of Barry & McMoran, a New Jersey law firm which provides, from time to time, legal services to Plaza Associates. Certain Related Party Transactions of Trump--Taj Associates and Affiliates. On January 8, 1996, as an inducement for Taj Holding, the Company and Merger Sub to enter into the Merger Agreement, Trump agreed to vote, or cause to be voted, all shares of Taj Holding Class C Common Stock beneficially owned by Trump in favor of the approval and adoption of the Merger Agreement. Taj Associates has entered into a lease with The Trump-Equitable Fifth Avenue Co., a corporation wholly owned by Trump, for the lease of office space in The Trump Tower in New York City, which Taj Associates uses as a marketing office. The monthly payments under the lease had been $1,000, and the premises were leased at such rent for four months in 1992, the full twelve months in 1993 and 1994 and eight months in 1995. On September 1, 1995, the lease was renewed for a term of five years with an option for Taj Associates to cancel the lease on September 1 of each year, upon six months' notice and payment of six months' rent. Under the renewed lease, the monthly payments are $2,184. Taj Associates currently leases the Specified Parcels from Realty Corp., consisting of land adjacent to the site of the Taj Mahal, which is being used primarily for a bus terminal, surface parking and the Taj Entertainment Complex, as well as the Steel Pier and a warehouse complex. During 1993, 1994 and 1995, lease obligations to Realty Corp. for these facilities were approximately $3.3 million per year. Upon consummation of the Merger Transaction, Taj Associates will purchase the Specified Parcels from Realty Corp. See "The Merger Transaction." On October 4, 1991, Taj Associates entered into the Taj Associates-First Fidelity Guarantee to guarantee performance by Realty Corp. of its obligations under the First Fidelity Loan. The Taj Associates-First Fidelity Guarantee is limited to any deficiency in the amount owed under the First Fidelity Loan when due, up to a 122
424B1123rd Page of 203TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 123rd
maximum of $30 million. In connection with the purchase of the Specified Parcels, First Fidelity will, among other things, release Taj Associates from the Taj Associates-First Fidelity Guarantee. See "Business--Certain Indebtedness--Taj Association--First Fidelity Loan/Specified Parcels." During 1992 and prior years, Taj Associates had an arrangement with the Trump Shuttle, Inc. (the "Trump Shuttle"), which at the time was beneficially owned by Trump, for the provision of airline services to Atlantic City on behalf of Taj Associates patrons. During 1992, Taj Associates incurred $29,000 in charges from the Trump Shuttle, all of which was paid. Taj Associates and Trump have entered into the Taj Services Agreement, which became effective in April 1991, and which provides that Trump will render to Taj Associates marketing, advertising, promotional and related services with respect to the business operations of Taj Associates through December 31, 1999. In consideration for the services to be rendered, Taj Associates pays an annual fee (the "Annual Fee") equal to 1 1/2% of Taj Associates' earnings before interest, taxes and depreciation less capital expenditures for such year, with a minimum base fee of $500,000 per annum. The base fee is payable monthly with the balance due April 15 of the following year. During 1993, 1994 and 1995, Trump earned approximately $1.6 million, $1.4 million and $1.7 million, respectively, in respect of the Annual Fee, including amounts paid to a third party pursuant to an assignment agreement. In addition to the Annual Fee, Taj Associates reimburses Trump on a monthly basis for all reasonable out-of-pocket expenses up to certain aggregate amounts incurred by Trump in performing his obligations under the Taj Services Agreement. During 1993, 1994 and 1995, Taj Associates reimbursed Trump $232,000, $224,000 and $261,000, respectively, for expenses pursuant to the Taj Services Agreement, of which $127,000, $148,000 and $164,000, respectively, was incurred to an affiliate for air transportation. Taj Associates has agreed to indemnify Trump from and against any licensing fees arising out of his performance of the Taj Services Agreement, and against any liability arising out of his performance of the Taj Services Agreement, other than that due to his gross negligence or willful misconduct. In connection with the Merger, the Taj Services Agreement will be terminated. On April 1, 1991, in connection with the Taj Services Agreement, Taj Associates and Trump entered into an Amended and Restated License Agreement (the "Taj License Agreement") which amended and restated an earlier license agreement between the parties. Pursuant to the Taj License Agreement, Taj Associates has the non-exclusive right to use the name and likeness of Trump, and the exclusive right to use the name and related marks and designs of the Trump Taj Mahal Casino Resort (collectively, the "Taj Marks"), in its advertising, marketing and promotional activities through December 31, 1999. All uses by Taj Associates of the names, marks, licenses and designs under the Taj License Agreement are subject to the prior written approval of Trump. Trump has agreed to indemnify Taj Associates against any liability for trademark or copyright infringement (in connection with the use by Taj Associates of the Taj Marks in accordance with the Taj License Agreement) arising solely by reason of any license agreement or other agreement entered into by Trump with respect to the Taj Marks. Taj Associates has collaterally assigned its right under the Taj License Agreement to the Taj Bond Trustee. Upon consummation of the Merger Transaction, the Taj License Agreement will be terminated and the Taj Marks licensed to the Company. John Barry, Trump's brother-in-law, is a partner of Barry & McMoran, a New Jersey law firm which provides, from time to time, legal services to Taj Associates. Other Relationships. The Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") requires issuers to disclose the existence of any other corporation in which both (i) an executive officer of the registrant serves on the board of directors and/or compensation committee, and (ii) a director of the registrant serves as an executive officer. Messrs. Ribis, Pickus and Burke, executive officers of the Company, have served on the boards of directors of other entities in which members of the Board of Directors (namely, Messrs. Trump and Ribis) served and continue to serve as executive officers. Management believes that such relationships have not affected the compensation decisions made by the Board of Directors in the last fiscal year. 123
424B1124th Page of 203TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 124th
Messrs. Trump and Ribis serve on the Board of Directors of Plaza Funding, the managing general partner of Plaza Associates, of which Messrs. Trump and Ribis are executive officers. Messrs. Trump and Ribis also serve on the Board of Directors of Plaza Holding Inc., of which Messrs. Trump, Ribis and Burke are also executive officers. Trump is not compensated by such entities for serving as an executive officer, however, he has entered into a personal services agreement with Plaza Associates and the Company. Messrs. Ribis and Burke are not compensated by the foregoing entities, however, they are compensated by Plaza Associates for their service as executive officers. Messrs. Ribis, Pickus and Burke serve on the Board of Directors of Taj Holding, which holds an indirect equity interest in Taj Associates, the partnership that owns the Taj Mahal, of which Trump is an executive officer. Such persons also serve on the Board of Directors of TM/GP, the managing general partner of Taj Associates, of which Messrs. Trump and Ribis are executive officers. Mr. Ribis is compensated by Taj Associates for his services as its Chief Executive Officer. See "--Employment Agreements." Mr. Ribis also serves on the Board of Directors of Realty Corp., which leases certain real property to Taj Associates, of which Trump is an executive officer. Trump, however, does not receive any compensation for serving as an executive officer of Realty Corp. Mr. Ribis receives compensation from TCA for acting as its Chief Executive Officer. See "--Employment Agreements." Prior to December 1995, Mr. Ribis was Counsel to the law firm of Ribis, Graham and Curtin (now practicing as Graham, Curtin & Sheridan, A Professional Association), which serves as New Jersey legal counsel to the Company, THCR Holdings, Plaza Associates, Taj Holdings, Taj Associates and certain of their affiliated entities. 124
424B1125th Page of 203TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 125th
CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS Payments to affiliates in connection with any such transactions are governed by the provisions of the Plaza Note Indenture and the Senior Note Indenture, and may also be governed by the provisions of the Mortgage Note Indenture, which provisions generally require that such transactions be on terms as favorable as would be obtainable from an unaffiliated party, and require the approval of a majority of the independent directors of the Company for certain affiliated transactions. THE COMPANY Trump and certain affiliates have engaged in certain related party transactions with respect to the Company and Plaza Associates. See "Management--Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation-- Certain Related Party Transactions of Trump--The Company, "--Plaza Associates" and "--Other Relationships." Plaza Associates has joint property insurance coverage with TCA, Taj Associates and other entities affiliated with Trump for which the annual premium paid by Plaza Associates was approximately $1.4 million for the 12 months ended May 1996. Plaza Associates leased from Taj Associates certain office facilities located in Pleasantville, New Jersey. In 1993 and 1992, lease payments by Plaza Associates to Taj Associates totaled approximately $30,000 and $138,000, respectively. Such lease terminated on March 19, 1993, and Plaza Associates vacated the premises. Through February 1, 1993, Plaza Associates also leased from Trump approximately 120 parking spaces at Trump Plaza East for approximately $5.50 per parking space per day, with payments under such arrangement for the years ended December 31, 1993 and December 31, 1992 totaling $21,000 and $227,000, respectively. Plaza Associates also leased portions of its warehouse facility located in Egg Harbor Township, New Jersey to TCA; lease payments by TCA to Plaza Associates totaled $6,000, $6,000 and $15,000 in 1995, 1994 and 1993, respectively. Indemnification Agreements. In addition to the indemnification provisions in the Company's and its subsidiaries' employment agreements (see "Management--Employment Agreements"), certain former and current directors of Plaza Funding entered into separate indemnification agreements in May 1992 with Plaza Associates pursuant to which such persons are afforded the full benefits of the indemnification provisions of the partnership agreement governing Plaza Associates. Plaza Associates also entered into an Indemnification Trust Agreement in November 1992 (the "Trust Agreement") with Midlantic (the "Indemnification Trustee") pursuant to which the sum of $100,000 was deposited by Plaza Associates with the Indemnification Trustee for the benefit of the directors of Plaza Funding and certain former directors of Trump Plaza GP to provide a source for indemnification for such persons if Plaza Associates, Plaza Funding or Trump Plaza GP, as the case may be, fails to immediately honor a demand for indemnification by such persons. The indemnification agreements with the directors of Plaza Funding and directors of Trump Plaza GP were amended in June 1993 to provide, among other things, that Plaza Associates would maintain directors' and officers' insurance covering such persons during the ten-year term (subject to extension) of the indemnification agreements; provided, however, that if such insurance would not be available on a commercially practicable basis, Plaza Associates could, in lieu of obtaining such insurance, annually deposit an amount in the Indemnification Trust Fund equal to $500,000 for the benefit of such directors; provided, however, that deposits relating to the failure to obtain such insurance shall not exceed $2.5 million. Such directors are covered by directors' and officers' insurance maintained by Plaza Associates. TAJ HOLDING AND AFFILIATES Trump and certain affiliates have engaged in certain related party transactions with respect to Taj Associates. See "Management--Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation--Certain Related Party Transactions of Trump--Taj Associates and Affiliates" and "--Other Relationships." 125
424B1126th Page of 203TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 126th
During the fiscal years ended December 31, 1993, 1994 and 1995, Taj Associates reimbursed Taj Holding $1,733,000, $2,171,000 and $1,554,000, respectively, for all amounts necessary to permit TM/GP or Taj Holding (a) to make payments that TM/GP or Taj Holding was required to make pursuant to the terms of TM/GP's Certificate of Incorporation and the Taj Holding Certificate of Incorporation (generally for indemnification of officers and directors), (b) to pay fees to directors (including fees for serving on a committee), (c) to pay all other expenses of TM/GP and Taj Holding and (d) to permit Taj Holding to redeem the Taj Holding Class B Common Stock when required to make such redemption pursuant to the terms of the Taj Holding Certificate of Incorporation. Taj Holding did not engage in any other transactions with its affiliates during the fiscal years ended December 31, 1993, 1994 and 1995. Taj Funding has not engaged in any transactions with its affiliates, except for the loan of funds made to Taj Associates in exchange for an intercompany note secured by a mortgage. Both the note and the mortgage were amended in 1991 pursuant to the 1991 Taj Restructuring. In April 1991, Taj Associates purchased from TCA for $1,687,000 two adjacent parcels of land on the Pleasantville-Egg Harbor Township border, constituting approximately ten acres. The first parcel contains two buildings, certain fleet maintenance facilities and an office building and warehouse facility, portions of which were leased to Plaza Associates. The lease expired in March 1993 and Plaza Associates has vacated. Taj Associates currently leases the space to commercial tenants. The second parcel is unimproved. In December 1994, Taj Associates entered into a one-year agreement with TCA pursuant to which TCA leases to Taj Associates 300 parking spaces (500 parking spaces during the months of May to September) at a rate of 50 cents per space per day, to be used for employee parking. The agreement expired in December 1995, however, TCA and Taj Associates are currently negotiating an extension of the agreement and have agreed to continue the lease on a month-to-month basis. Taj Associates engages in various transactions with Trump Plaza and Trump's Castle. These transactions are charged at cost or normal selling price in the case of retail items and include certain shared payroll costs as well as complimentary services offered to customers. Expenses incurred by Taj Associates payable to TCA for the years ended December 31, 1993, 1994 and 1995 were approximately $1,100,000, $1,167,000 and $1,072,000, respectively, of which all but $69,000, $30,000, and $164,000, respectively, was paid or offset against amounts owed to Taj Associates by TCA. Expenses incurred by Taj Associates payable to Plaza Associates for the years ended December 31, 1993, 1994 and 1995 were approximately $83,000, $149,000 and $445,000, respectively, all of which were offset against amounts owed to Taj Associates by Plaza Associates, with the exception of $167,000 at December 31, 1995. Indemnification Agreements. In addition to the indemnification provisions in Taj Associates' employment agreements, the Merger Agreement provides for indemnification of any present or former director, officer, employee or agent of Taj Holding and TM/GP, arising from his services as such, within six years of the Effective Time. 126
424B1127th Page of 203TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 127th
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT The following table sets forth, as of April 1, 1996 (without giving effect to the transactions contemplated by the Merger Transaction), certain information regarding the beneficial ownership of Common Stock by (i) each of the Company's executive officers, (ii) each director of the Company, (iii) each person who is known to the Company to own beneficially more than 5% of the Common Stock and (iv) all officers and directors of the Company as a group. Such information is based, in part, upon information provided by certain stockholders of the Company. In the case of persons other than members of the officers and directors of the Company, such information is based solely on a review of Schedules 13G filed with the SEC. [Download Table] BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP ---------------------- NAME NUMBER PERCENT ---- --------- ------- Donald J. Trump.......................................... 6,667,217(/1/) 39.8% Nicholas L. Ribis........................................ 72,487(/2/) * John P. Burke............................................ 400(/3/) * Robert M. Pickus......................................... 200 * Wallace B. Askins........................................ 3,000 * Don M. Thomas............................................ 200 * Peter M. Ryan............................................ -- -- INVESCO PLC.............................................. 527,300(/4/) 5.2 Hellman, Jordan Management Co., Inc. .................... 882,700(/5/) 8.8 The Capital Group Companies, Inc. ....................... 1,064,000(/6/) 10.6 State Street Research & Management Company............... 1,270,300(/7/) 12.6 Oppenheimer Group, Inc. ................................. 1,490,075(/8/) 14.8 All officers and directors of the Company (7 persons).... 6,743,504 40.2 The above persons have sole voting and investment power, unless otherwise indicated below. --------------------- * Less than 1%. (1) 725 Fifth Avenue, New York, New York 10022. These shares include 6,666,667 shares of Common Stock, into which Trump's limited partnership interest in THCR Holdings is convertible, subject to certain adjustments. See "Description of the THCR Holdings Partnership Agreement." These shares include 300 shares of Common Stock held by his wife, Mrs. Marla M. Trump, of which shares Trump disclaims beneficial ownership. Trump is also the beneficial owner of the outstanding shares of the Class B Common Stock (1,000 shares). The Class B Common Stock has voting power equivalent to the voting power of the Common Stock into which Trump's limited partnership interest is convertible. Upon conversion of all or any portion of the THCR Holdings limited partnership interest into shares of Common Stock, the corresponding voting power of the Class B Common Stock will be proportionately diminished. See "Description of Capital Stock." (2) Represents a stock bonus awarded to the President of the Company pursuant to the 1995 Stock Plan. See "Management--Executive Compensation." These shares include 3,081 shares and 2,739 shares held by Mr. Ribis as custodian for his son, Nicholas L. Ribis, Jr., and his daughter, Alexandria Ribis, respectively, of which shares Mr. Ribis disclaims beneficial ownership. (3) Mr. Burke shares voting and dispositive power of 100 of these shares with his wife. These shares also include 100 shares beneficially owned solely by his wife, of which shares Mr. Burke disclaims beneficial ownership. (4) 11 Devonshire Square, London EC2M 4YR, England. INVESCO PLC ("Invesco"), the parent holding company, shares voting and dispositive power over these shares with four of its subsidiaries. Invesco and its subsidiaries disclaim beneficial ownership of these shares, which are held by them on behalf of other persons who have the right to receive (or direct the receipt) of dividends and proceeds from the sale of such shares. (5) 75 State Street, Suite 2420, Boston, Massachusetts 02109. Hellman, Jordan Management Co., Inc. ("Hellman") is an investment adviser which has sole dispositive power over all of these shares and sole voting power over 817,700 of these shares. Hellman's clients have the power to revoke Hellman's dispositive power upon 30 days' written notice. (6) 333 South Hope Street, Los Angeles, California 90071. The Capital Group Companies, Inc. ("Capital Group") has sole dispositive power over these shares and sole voting power over 256,000 of these shares. These shares include 654,000 shares beneficially owned by Capital Guardian Trust Company ("Capital Guardian"), respectively. Capital Group is the parent holding company of Capital Guardian. Capital Group and Capital Guardian disclaim beneficial ownership of these shares. (7) One Financial Center, 30th Floor, Boston, Massachusetts 02111. State Street Research & Management Company ("State Street") is an investment adviser and disclaims beneficial ownership of these shares. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, One Madison Avenue, New York, New York 10010, is the parent holding company of State Street. (8) Oppenheimer Tower, World Financial Center, New York, New York 10281. Oppenheimer Group, Inc. ("Oppenheimer") has shared voting and dispositive power over these shares. These shares include 886,400 shares beneficially owned by Oppenheimer Capital, an investment adviser, of which Oppenheimer is the parent holding company. 127
424B1128th Page of 203TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 128th
DESCRIPTION OF CAPITAL STOCK The following summary description of the capital stock of the Company does not purport to be complete and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the Certificate of Incorporation and the By-Laws, copies of which are filed as exhibits to this Registration Statement of which this Prospectus is a part. GENERAL The authorized capital stock of the Company consists of (i) 50,000,000 shares of Common Stock, of which 10,066,667 shares are currently issued and outstanding, (ii) 1,000 shares of Class B Common Stock, all of which are currently issued and outstanding, and (iii) 1,000,000 shares of Preferred Stock, par value $1.00 per share (the "Preferred Stock"), none of which are issued and outstanding. COMMON STOCK AND CLASS B COMMON STOCK Holders of Common Stock are entitled to one vote for each share held on all matters submitted to a vote of stockholders and do not have cumulative voting rights. Subject to the rights of the holders of the Class B Common Stock described below, holders of a majority of the shares of Common Stock are entitled to vote in any election of directors, may elect all of the directors standing for election. Holders of Common Stock are entitled to receive ratably such dividends, if any, as may be declared by the Board of Directors out of funds legally available therefor. Upon the liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the Company, the holders of Common Stock and Class B Common Stock will share ratably, out of the assets of the Company legally available for distribution to its stockholders, to the extent of their par value, $.01 per share. After such payment is made, the holders of the Common Stock will be entitled to participate ratably in all of the remaining assets of the Company available for distribution. Holders of Common Stock have no subscription, redemption or conversion rights. Holders of Common Stock have no preemptive rights to subscribe to any additional securities that the Company may issue, nor is the Common Stock subject to calls or assessments by the Company. All the outstanding shares of Common Stock are, and the shares of Common Stock to be issued in connection with the Merger Transaction, when issued and paid for will be, fully paid and non-assessable. The rights, preferences and privileges of holders of Common Stock are subject to, and may be adversely affected by, the rights of the holders of shares of any series of Preferred Stock that the Company may designate and issue in the future. Trump currently is the beneficial owner of all 1,000 outstanding shares of Class B Common Stock. The Class B Common Stock votes together with the Common Stock as a single class on all matters submitted to stockholders of the Company for a vote or in respect of which consents are solicited (other than in connection with certain amendments of the Certificate of Incorporation described below). The number of votes represented by the Class B Common Stock held by any holder equals the number of shares of Common Stock issuable to the holder upon the conversion of such holder's partnership interest in THCR Holdings into Common Stock. Upon such conversion, the corresponding voting power of shares of Class B Common Stock (equal in voting power to the number of shares of Common Stock issued upon such conversion) will be proportionately diminished. The Class B Common Stock provides Trump with a voting interest in the Company which is proportionate to his equity interest in THCR Holdings' assets represented by his limited partnership interest. Except for the right to receive par value upon liquidation, the Class B Common Stock has no right to receive any dividend or other distribution in respect of the equity of the Company. In addition, the Certificate of Incorporation provides that the Class B Common Stock is not entitled to a separate class vote on any matters submitted to the stockholders of the Company for their approval, except for any amendment of the terms of the Class B Common Stock, which require (x) the affirmative vote of the Class B Common Stock, voting as a separate class, and (y) the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares of Common Stock held by persons who are not beneficial owners of Class B Common Stock, voting as a separate class. In accordance with the requirements of the Casino Control Act and the Indiana Riverboat Gambling Act, the Certificate of Incorporation provides that all securities of the Company are held subject to the condition that, if a holder thereof is found to be disqualified, such holder shall: (a) dispose of his interest in the Company; (b) not 128
424B1129th Page of 203TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 129th
receive any dividends or interest upon any such securities; (c) not exercise, directly or indirectly or through any trustee or nominee, any right conferred by such securities; and (d) not receive any remuneration in any form from the casino license for services rendered or otherwise. The Certificate of Incorporation further provides that the Company may redeem any shares of the Company's capital stock held by any person or entity whose holding of shares may cause the loss or non-reinstatement of a governmental license held by the Company. Such redemption shall be at the lesser of fair market value (as defined in the Certificate of Incorporation), or the purchase price of such capital stock. The Certificate of Incorporation may also contain other provisions required by the gaming laws of other jurisdictions. The Transfer Agent for the Company's Common Stock is Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Company, New York, New York. PREFERRED STOCK The Board of Directors may, without further action by the Company's stockholders, issue Preferred Stock in one or more series and fix the rights, preferences, privileges, qualifications, limitations and restrictions of the Preferred Stock including dividend rights, voting rights, terms of redemption, redemption prices, liquidation preferences and the number of shares constituting any series or the designation of such series. The issuance of Preferred Stock may have the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing a change in control of the Company without further action by the stockholders and may adversely affect the voting and other rights of the holders of Common Stock. At present, the Company has no plans to issue any of the Preferred Stock. PROVISIONS HAVING POSSIBLE ANTI-TAKEOVER EFFECTS The Certificate of Incorporation and the By-Laws contain provisions that could have anti-takeover effects. These provisions are intended to enhance the likelihood of continuity and stability in the composition of the Board of Directors and in the policies formulated by the Board of Directors and to discourage certain types of transactions which may involve an actual or threatened change of control of the Company. The provisions are designed to reduce the vulnerability of the Company to an unsolicited proposal for a takeover of the Company that does not contemplate the acquisition of all of its outstanding shares or an unsolicited proposal for the restructuring or sale of all or part of the Company. The provisions are also intended to discourage certain tactics that may be used in proxy fights. The Board of Directors believes that, as a general rule, such takeover proposals would not be in the best interest of the Company and its stockholders. Set forth below is a description of such provisions in the Certificate of Incorporation and the By-Laws. The Board of Directors has no current plans to formulate or effect additional measures that could have an anti-takeover effect. The Certificate of Incorporation provides that directors, other than those, if any, elected by the holders of the Preferred Stock, can be removed from office only for cause and only by the affirmative vote of the holders of at least 66 2/3% of the combined voting power of the then outstanding shares of capital stock entitled to vote thereon ("Voting Stock"). Pursuant to the By- Laws, newly created directorships resulting from any increase in the authorized number of directors and any vacancies on the Board of Directors may be filled by the affirmative vote of a majority of the remaining directors. Except as otherwise provided for with respect to the rights of the holders of Preferred Stock, the Certificate of Incorporation provides that the whole Board of Directors will consist of that number of directors determined from time to time by the Board of Directors. The By-Laws establish an advance notice procedure with regard to the nomination, other than by or at the direction of the Board of Directors or a committee thereof, of candidates for election as directors and with regard to certain other matters to be brought before an annual meeting of stockholders of the Company. In general, notice must be received by the Company not later than 10 days after the public announcement of the meeting date and must contain certain specified information concerning the matters to be brought before the meeting and the stockholder submitting the proposal. 129
424B1130th Page of 203TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 130th
In addition, the Certificate of Incorporation provides that whenever any vote of Voting Stock is required by law to amend, alter, repeal or rescind any provision thereof, then, in addition to any affirmative vote required by law or any required vote of the holders of Preferred Stock, the affirmative vote of at least a majority of the combined voting power of the then-outstanding shares of Voting Stock and approval by at least a majority of the then- authorized number of directors of the Company is required to amend certain provisions of the Certificate of Incorporation; provided, however, that if any such amendment, alteration, repeal, or rescission (a "Change") relates to those provisions or to removal of directors, such Change must also be approved by the affirmative vote of the holders of at least 66 2/3% of the combined voting power of the then-outstanding shares of Voting Stock, voting together as a single class and, if at the time there exist one or more Related Persons (as defined), such Change must also be approved by the affirmative vote of the holders of at least a majority of the combined voting power of the Disinterested Shares (defined in the Certificate of Incorporation as, to any Related Person, shares of Voting Stock that are beneficially owned and owned of record by stockholders other than such Related Person). A "Related Person" means any person, entity or group which beneficially owns 10% or more of the outstanding voting stock of the Company; provided, however, that Trump and his affiliates are not deemed to be a Related Person. The Certificate of Incorporation provides that the vote(s) required by the immediately preceding provision shall not be required if such Change has been first approved by at least two-thirds of the then- authorized number of directors of the Company and, if at the time there exist one or more Related Persons, by a majority of the Continuing Directors (as defined with respect to any Related Person to be any member of the Board of Directors who (i) is unaffiliated with and is not the Related Person and (ii) became a member of the Board of Directors prior to the time that the Related Person became a Related Person, and any successor of a Continuing Director who is recommended to succeed a Continuing Director by a majority of Continuing Directors then on the Board of Directors). The Certificate of Incorporation provides that the By-Laws may be adopted, altered, amended or repealed by the stockholders of the Company or by a majority vote of the entire Board of Directors. The Certificate of Incorporation provides that, except as otherwise provided for with respect to the rights of the holders of Preferred Stock, no action that is required or permitted to be taken by the stockholders of the Company at any annual or special meeting of stockholders may be effected by written consent of stockholders in lieu of a meeting of stockholders, unless the action to be effected by written consent of stockholders and the taking of such action by such written consent have expressly been approved in advance by the Board of Directors and, if such action involves a "business combination" within the meaning of Section 203 of the DGCL, such written consent shall have expressly been approved in advance by the affirmative vote of at least a majority of the Continuing Directors then in office. DELAWARE LAW AND CERTAIN CHARTER AND BY-LAW PROVISIONS The Company is subject to the provisions of Section 203 of the DGCL. Section 203 of the DGCL prohibits a publicly held Delaware corporation from engaging in a "business combination" with an "interested stockholder" for a period of three years after the date of the transaction in which the person became an interested stockholder, unless the business combination is approved in a prescribed manner. A "business combination" includes mergers, asset sales and other transactions resulting in a financial benefit to the interested stockholder. Subject to certain exceptions, an "interested stockholder" is a person who, together with affiliates and associates, owns, or within three years did own, 15% of the corporation's voting stock. Neither Trump nor any of his affiliates is deemed to be an "interested stockholder" for purposes of Section 203 of the DGCL. The Certificate of Incorporation contains certain provisions permitted under the DGCL relating to the liability of directors. The provisions eliminate a director's liability for monetary damages for a breach of fiduciary duty, except in certain circumstances involving wrongful acts, such as the breach of a director's duty of loyalty or acts or omissions which involve intentional misconduct or a knowing violation of law. Furthermore, the Certificate of Incorporation and the By-Laws contain provisions to indemnify Company's directors and 130
424B1131st Page of 203TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 131st
officers to the fullest extent permitted by the DGCL, including payment in advance of a final disposition of a director's or officer's expenses and attorneys' fees incurred in defending any action, suit or proceeding. The Company believes that these provisions assist the Company in attracting and retaining qualified individuals to serve as directors. 131
424B1132nd Page of 203TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 132nd
DESCRIPTION OF THE THCR HOLDINGS PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT The following summary of the Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of THCR Holdings (the "THCR Holdings Partnership Agreement"), and the description of certain provisions set forth elsewhere in this Prospectus, is qualified in its entirety by reference to such partnership agreement, which is filed as an exhibit to the Registration Statement of which this Prospectus is a part. THCR Holdings was formed in 1995 under the Delaware Revised Uniform Limited Partnership Act, as amended (the "Delaware RULPA"). Stockholders of the Company are neither general nor limited partners of THCR Holdings, and influence or control THCR Holdings solely through their ownership of Common Stock. DISTRIBUTIONS AND ALLOCATIONS OF PROFITS AND LOSSES THCR Holdings makes any required distributions to each partner of THCR Holdings (each, a "Partner") for taxes ("Tax Amounts") in one or more payments from time to time during each year, but in no event later than March 1 of the year immediately following such year, in an aggregate cash sum equal to such Partner's percentage interest in Tax Amounts in respect of such year. In general, Tax Amounts for any year are the product of the highest marginal tax rate applicable to any of the Partners (subject to certain limitations) and THCR Holdings' taxable income for such year. The THCR Holdings Partnership Agreement provides that after making the required tax distributions, additional distributions will be made from time to time as determined by a majority of the Board of Directors, but in any case pro rata in accordance with the Partners' percentage interests. THCR Holdings' ability to make distributions (including tax distributions) is subject to, among other things, limitations set forth in the Senior Note Indenture. See "Risk Factors-- Restrictions on Certain Activities." Profits and losses for tax purposes are generally allocated among the partners in accordance with their percentage interests, subject to compliance with the provisions of Section 704(b) and 704(c) of the Internal Revenue Code (the "Code") and the Treasury Regulations thereunder governing special allocations of certain partnership items, including the "ceiling rule" set forth in Treasury Regulations Section 1.704-3 (which are not subject to cure by special allocation except as specifically provided in the THCR Holdings Partnership Agreement). THCR Holdings has agreed that all expenses of the Company shall, to the maximum extent practicable, be paid directly by THCR Holdings. Any other expenses paid directly by the Company are required to be reimbursed promptly by THCR Holdings and are deemed to be expenses of THCR Holdings. MANAGEMENT As the sole general partner of THCR Holdings, the Company generally has the exclusive rights, responsibilities and discretion in the management and control of THCR Holdings. The limited partners of THCR Holdings (the "Limited Partners") have no authority, as Limited Partners, to transact business or take any acts on behalf of, or make any decision for, THCR Holdings. Trump, however, has the right to control the management of Plaza Associates. In connection with the Merger Transaction, the THCR Holdings Partnership Agreement will be amended to give Trump the right to control the resolution of tax matters affecting or relating to Taj Associates in respect of periods ending on or prior to the date on which Taj Holding acquired its interest in Taj Associates, including requiring THCR Holdings, Trump AC and Taj Associates to adjust the tax basis of assets held by Taj Associates in connection with the resolution of such tax matters to the extent such basis adjustments shall not reduce the Company's share of federal income tax depreciation and cost recovery deductions in respect of assets held by Taj Associates as of the date of the Merger and contributions of the interests in Taj Associates to Trump AC (on behalf, and at the direction, of THCR Holdings). The THCR Holdings Partnership Agreement provides that the Company shall not, without the consent of a majority-in-interest of the Limited Partners, undertake actions relating to any of the following during such time as the Limited Partners own more than 10% of the outstanding partnership interests in THCR Holdings: the dissolution of THCR Holdings under the Delaware RULPA, the institution of any proceedings for bankruptcy on 132
424B1133rd Page of 203TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 133rd
behalf of THCR Holdings, the making of a general assignment for the benefit of creditors or the appointment of a custodian, receiver or trustee for all or any part of the assets of THCR Holdings. TRANSFERABILITY OF INTERESTS The THCR Holdings Partnership Agreement provides that the Company may not withdraw as general partner of THCR Holdings, or transfer without the consent of a majority-in-interest of the Limited Partners (other than the Company), so long as the Limited Partners hold at least a 10% interest in THCR Holdings; provided, however, that such consent right shall not apply to a determination by the Company or THCR Holdings to enter into a merger, sale, consolidation, combination or similar transaction. A Limited Partner may transfer all or any portion of his interests in THCR Holdings, provided that (i) the Company including a majority of the Special Committee (as defined) consents to such transfer, which consent may not be unreasonably withheld or delayed, except no such consent is required for (a) a transfer of Partnership interests described below under "Exchange and Registration Rights," (b) a transfer to a Permitted Holder (which term includes the spouse and other descendants of such Limited Partner (including any related trusts controlled by, and established and maintained for the sole benefit of, such Limited Partner or such spouse or descendant) and the estate of any of the foregoing), or (c) a transfer upon foreclosure on an interest of a Limited Partner pursuant to certain permitted liens and (ii) such transfer does not violate certain other restrictions on transfer contained in the THCR Holdings Partnership Agreement. No transferee is admitted as a substitute Limited Partner of THCR Holdings having the rights of a Limited Partner without the consent of the Company, including a majority of the Special Committee. ADDITIONAL CAPITAL CONTRIBUTIONS; ISSUANCE OF ADDITIONAL PARTNERSHIP INTERESTS No Partner is required under the terms of the THCR Holdings Partnership Agreement to make additional capital contributions to THCR Holdings, except as described below in connection with the issuance of additional partnership interests. The THCR Holdings Partnership Agreement provides that no additional Partnership interests will be issued, except in the case of (i) an additional partnership interest to the Company in exchange for a contribution of value from the Company and (ii) an additional limited partnership interest to Trump or his Permitted Holders in exchange for a contribution of value from Trump or his Permitted Holders (as defined in the THCR Holdings Partnership Agreement), as determined by a majority of the Special Committee. The Special Committee is composed of directors who are not officers or employees of the Company and who are not affiliates of Trump or any of his affiliates. The THCR Holdings Partnership Agreement currently provides that the Company will not issue additional debt or equity securities, unless the proceeds of such issuance are contributed to THCR Holdings and that it will not issue any additional shares of Class B Common Stock, except to Trump or his Permitted Holders. In connection with, and in light of the structure necessary to consummate the Merger Transaction, the THCR Holdings Partnership Agreement will be amended to provide that the Company may contribute to Trump AC the indirect interests in Taj Associates that the Company acquires in the Merger and the proceeds from the Stock Offering, rather than make such contributions directly to THCR Holdings. Furthermore, the THCR Holdings Partnership Agreement will be amended to provide that THCR Holdings may issue limited partnership interests to TTMI and TM/GP in exchange for the contribution of their respective 49.995% equity interest in Taj Associates. EXCHANGE AND REGISTRATION RIGHTS The Company entered into an exchange and registration rights agreement (the "Exchange Rights Agreement") with Trump, pursuant to which, among other things: (i) Trump and his permitted successors and assigns are able to exchange all or any portion of their interest in THCR Holdings for Common Stock and (ii) a majority of the Special Committee has the right to require any holder of a limited partnership interest (other than 133
424B1134th Page of 203TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 134th
Trump and his Permitted Holders) to exchange their Partnership interests for Common Stock. The number of shares of Common Stock issuable upon exchange of limited partnership interests is adjusted from time to time to reflect stock dividends, stock splits, reverse stock splits, reclassifications and recapitalizations. The exchange of limited partnership interests for shares of Common Stock under the Exchange Rights Agreement is subject to (i) the expiration or termination of the applicable waiting period, if any, under the Hart-Scott- Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976, as amended, and (ii) the satisfaction of certain other conditions contained in the Exchange Rights Agreement. The Exchange Rights Agreement provides that, upon a transfer of limited partnership interests in THCR Holdings, the transferee will obtain the benefits of, and be subject to, all of the provisions of the Exchange Rights Agreement. The Exchange Rights Agreement contains certain registration rights under the Securities Act in favor of the holders of the Common Stock issuable upon the exchange of limited partnership interests. The holders of securities representing a majority of the Common Stock issuable upon the exchange of limited partnership interests shall have the right to require the Company, at the Company's expense (other than with respect to underwriting discounts, commissions and fees attributable to the sale of any such Common Stock), subject to certain limitations, to file two registration statements relating to the resale to the public of all or a portion of their Common Stock. In addition, in the event the Company proposes to register any of its Common Stock pursuant to a registration statement under the Securities Act (other than on Forms S-4 or S-8 or other similar successor forms), such holders may, by giving written notice to the Company, request that the Company, at the Company's expense (other than with respect to underwriting discounts, commissions and fees attributable to the sale of any such Common Stock), include in such registered offering all or any part of their Common Stock. The Company is required to include the securities covered by such notice or notices in such registered offering unless the Company determines for any reason not to proceed with the underlying offering of its equity securities or, in the case of an underwritten offering, if the managing underwriter determines that the amount of Common Stock requested to be included in such registration exceeds the amount which can be sold in such offering without adversely affecting the distribution of the securities being offered. In connection with the Merger Transaction, the Exchange Rights Agreement will be amended to, among other things, extend to TTMI registration rights with respect to the shares of Common Stock into which its limited partnership interests will be convertible and to make certain accommodations of the interests of certain of Trump's lenders should they foreclose on THCR Holdings limited partnership interests. In addition, the shares of Common Stock issuable upon the exercise of the warrant to be issued to Trump will have registration rights similar to those currently held by Trump. TAX MATTERS PARTNER Pursuant to the THCR Holdings Partnership Agreement, the Company is the tax matters partner of THCR Holdings and, as such, has authority to make tax elections under the Code on behalf of THCR Holdings, subject to certain notice and consultation rights in favor of the Limited Partners. TERM The term of the THCR Holdings Partnership Agreement continues until December 31, 2035, or until sooner dissolved upon (i) the dissolution, bankruptcy or termination of the Company, (ii) the election of the Company and a majority- in-interest of the Limited Partners, (iii) the sale or other disposition of all or substantially all the assets of THCR Holdings (but in the event of such sale or transfer, such time of dissolution may be extended, at the option of the Company, until the receipt of substantially all of the proceeds thereof, or a determination by the Company that no material additional proceeds will likely be received), or (iv) the entry of a decree of judicial dissolution of THCR Holdings pursuant to the provisions of the Delaware RULPA, which decree is final and not subject to approval; provided, however, the Limited Partners may elect to continue THCR Holdings. An election to continue THCR Holdings must be unanimous unless the Delaware RULPA permits such election pursuant to 134
424B1135th Page of 203TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 135th
the vote of a lesser percentage in interest of the Limited Partners, in which event such election may be by such lesser percentage in interest as is permitted in the Delaware RULPA, but in no event shall such election be by a vote of less than a majority-in-interest of the Limited Partners. CONTRIBUTION AGREEMENT Trump received his limited partnership interest in THCR Holdings in exchange for a contribution of, among other things, all of his beneficial interest in Plaza Associates and all of his other existing interests and rights to gaming activities in both emerging and established jurisdictions, including Trump Indiana, but excluding the Taj Mahal and Trump's Castle. Such contribution was made pursuant to the terms of the Contribution Agreement between Trump and THCR Holdings. Under the Contribution Agreement, Trump agreed to pursue, develop and conduct all new casino and gaming opportunities only on behalf of the Company. Trump further agreed not to engage in certain actions in connection with casino and gaming activities, including, without limitation, casino hotels and related services and products. For purposes of this grant and without limiting its application with respect to other properties, any hotel with gaming conducted on its premises will be considered a casino hotel and any business or activity engaged in by Trump and located in Nevada, Atlantic City (other than the Taj Mahal (prior to the Merger Transaction) and Trump's Castle) or within one mile of a casino will be presumed to be an activity to which these restrictions will apply. Such a presumption may be rebutted by a vote of the majority of the Special Committee. The agreement to offer new gaming opportunities to the Company is for a term of the later of (i) June 12, 2015, (ii) such time as Trump and his affiliates no longer hold a 15% or greater voting interest in the Company or (iii) such time as Trump ceases to be employed or retained pursuant to an employment, management, consulting or similar services agreement with the Company. Trump may generally continue to engage in business as currently conducted or proposed to be conducted at the Taj Mahal (prior to the Merger Transaction) and Trump's Castle. For as long as Trump owns beneficially 20% or more of the voting power of the Company and no other holder owns more voting power of the Company, or such shorter period ending on the date on which no Plaza Notes remain outstanding, to the extent required under the Plaza Note Indenture, Trump shall retain the right (x) to designate for election a majority of the Board of Directors of Plaza Funding and its successors and assigns and any other managing general partner of Plaza Associates and (y) to control the management of Plaza Associates. See "Risk Factors--Conflicts of Interest" and "--Control and Involvement of Trump." INDEMNIFICATION THCR Holdings indemnifies and holds harmless each Partner and its affiliates, and all officers, directors, employees and agents of such Partner and its affiliates (individually, an "Indemnitee") from and against any and all losses, claims, demands, costs, damages, liabilities, joint and several, expenses of any nature (including attorneys' fees and disbursements), judgments, fines, settlements and other amounts arising from any and all claims, demands, actions, suits or proceedings, civil, criminal, administrative or investigative, in which the Indemnitee may be involved, or threatened to be involved, as a party or otherwise, relating to the operations of THCR Holdings, including, without limitation, liabilities under the federal and state securities laws, regardless of whether the Indemnitee continues to be a Partner, an affiliate of a Partner, or an officer, director, employee, or agent of a Partner or an affiliate of a Partner at the time any such liability or expense is paid or incurred, but only if the act or omission giving rise to such proceeding does not constitute gross negligence or willful misconduct; provided, however, that such indemnification or agreement to hold harmless, will be recoverable only out of assets of THCR Holdings and not from the Partners. The indemnification provided by the THCR Holdings Partnership Agreement is in addition to any other rights to which an Indemnitee may be entitled under any agreement, as a matter of law or equity, or otherwise, both as to action in the Indemnitee's capacity as a Partner, an affiliate of a Partner, or as an officer, director, employee or agent of a Partner or an affiliate of a Partner and as to any action in another capacity, and will continue, with respect to actions relating to the operations of THCR Holdings, as to an Indemnitee who has ceased to serve in such capacity and will inure to the benefit of the heirs, successors, assigns and administrators of the Indemnitee. No Indemnitee may be denied indemnification in whole or in part under the THCR Holdings Partnership Agreement by reason of the fact that the Indemnitee had an interest in the transaction with respect to which the indemnification applies if the 135
424B1136th Page of 203TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 136th
transaction was approved in accordance with the THCR Holdings Partnership Agreement. No officer, employee or agent of THCR Holdings has any liability to THCR Holdings or any of its partners for monetary damages for action taken, or any failure to take any action, in such capacity, with certain exceptions. CERTAIN REGULATORY MATTERS The THCR Holdings Partnership Agreement provides that it is subject to the provisions of the Casino Control Act and the Indiana Riverboat Gambling Act. The THCR Holdings Partnership Agreement further provides that THCR Holdings may redeem the partnership interest held by any person or entity whose holding of such interest may cause the loss or non-reinstatement of any governmental license or permit of THCR Holdings or any of its subsidiaries. Such redemption will be on the terms set forth in the THCR Holdings Partnership Agreement. OTHER The THCR Holdings Partnership Agreement provides that, unless a majority-in- interest of the Limited Partners otherwise consents, all business activities of the Company must be conducted through THCR Holdings or its subsidiaries. THCR Holdings is authorized to enter into transactions with partners or their affiliates, as long as the terms of such transactions are fair and reasonable and no less favorable to THCR Holdings than would be obtained from an unaffiliated third party. Except for certain technical amendments, the THCR Holdings Partnership Agreement may only be amended by the Company, upon the approval of a majority of the Special Committee with the consent of a majority-in- interest of the Limited Partners. Except for Trump's agreement to conduct all new gaming activities through the Company as described above and under "--Contribution Agreement" and "Management--Employment Agreements," the THCR Holdings Partnership Agreement provides that any Limited Partner may engage in other business activities outside THCR Holdings, including business activities that directly compete with THCR Holdings; provided, however, that no such other activities discriminate against THCR Holdings. See "Risk Factors--Conflicts of Interest" and "--Control and Involvement of Trump." THCR Holdings has agreed to indemnify Trump in the event of the non-payment by THCR Holdings of certain liabilities assumed by THCR Holdings in connection with its formation. The THCR Holdings Partnership Agreement also provides that no additional compensation shall be paid directly or indirectly to Trump under the Trump Executive Agreement or otherwise, unless approved by the Special Committee. Other than the TPM Services Agreement and notwithstanding the foregoing, the Company (including each of its subsidiaries) may not enter into any management, services, consulting or similar agreements with Trump or any of his affiliates, except for employment agreements in the ordinary course of business consistent with industry practice and approved by the Special Committee. 136
424B1137th Page of 203TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 137th
SHARES ELIGIBLE FOR FUTURE SALE Immediately following completion of the Stock Offering there will be approximately 23,377,718 shares of Common Stock outstanding (25,252,718 shares if the Underwriters' over-allotment options are exercised in full), excluding (i) 8,072,307 shares of Common Stock (subject to certain adjustment) issuable upon conversion of Trump's and TTMI's limited partnership interest in THCR Holdings, (ii) the 66,666 shares of Common Stock underlying phantom stock units issued to the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, (iii) 133,333 shares of Common Stock issuable upon exercise of options granted to the Chief Executive Officer of the Company pursuant to the 1995 Stock Plan (iv) an additional 933,334 shares of Common Stock reserved for issuance pursuant to the 1995 Stock Plan, (v) 1.8 million shares of Common Stock reserved for issuance in connection with the warrant to be issued Trump and (vi) the Class B Common Stock, which shares are not entitled to dividends or distributions and represent Trump's and TTMI's respective voting interest and become nonvoting to the extent of a conversion of Trump's and TTMI's respective interests in THCR Holdings. In the event that shares of Common Stock are issued in the Merger, the Company may reduce the size of the Stock Offering. Of the shares of Common Stock to be outstanding following consummation of the Merger Transaction, the shares to be sold in the Stock Offering and to be issued to First Fidelity (425,000 of the 500,000 shares of which will be subject to an agreement not to sell or otherwise dispose for 30 days without the prior written consent of DLJ), as well as the shares of Common Stock issued in the June 1995 Stock Offering, will be freely tradable without restriction (subject to any applicable lock-up) or future registration under the Securities Act unless acquired by an "affiliate" (as defined in the Securities Act) of the Company, which shares will be subject to resale limitations of Rule 144. The remaining 66,667 shares outstanding upon completion of the Stock Offering will not have been registered under the Securities Act and are Restricted Shares, except that such shares, the shares of Common Stock issuable upon conversion of Trump's and TTMI's limited partnership interest in THCR Holdings and the shares issuable under the warrant to be issued to Trump have or will have certain registration rights. See "Description of the THCR Holdings Partnership Agreement--Exchange and Registration Rights." The 8,072,307 shares of Common Stock issuable upon conversion of limited partnership interest in THCR Holdings are restricted securities, and may not be resold except pursuant to an effective registration statement or an exemption from registration, such as Rule 144. The Company has granted certain registration rights with respect to such shares to the holders of limited partnership interests in THCR Holdings. See "Description of THCR Holdings Partnership Agreement--Exchange and Registration Rights." In general, under Rule 144 as currently in effect, a person (or persons whose shares are aggregated) including an affiliate of the Company who has beneficially owned his or her Restricted Shares for at least two years from the later of the date such securities were acquired from the Company or (if applicable) the date they were acquired from an affiliate of the Company, would be entitled to sell within any three-month period a number of shares that does not exceed the greater of (i) one percent of the then outstanding shares of the Common Stock (approximately 233,777 shares of Common Stock immediately after the Stock Offering, or 252,527 shares assuming exercise of the Underwriters over-allotment option) and (ii) the average weekly trading volume of the Common Stock during the four calendar weeks preceding the date on which notice of the sale on Form 144 is filed with the SEC. Sales under Rule 144 are also subject to certain manner-of-sale provisions, notice requirements and the availability of current public information about the Company and certain other limitations and restrictions. Under Rule 144, however, a person who is deemed not to have been an affiliate of the Company at any time during the 90 days preceding a sale of Restricted Shares by such person, and who has beneficially owned such Restricted Shares for a minimum of three years from the later of the date such securities were acquired from the Company or an affiliate of the Company, such person is free to sell such shares in the public market under Rule 144(k) without regard to the volume, manner-of-sale and certain other limitations contained in Rule 144. The Company, certain stockholders and the directors and executive officers of the Company will agree not to sell or otherwise dispose of such shares or securities convertible into or exercisable or exchangeable for Common Stock for 180 days after the date of this Prospectus without the prior written consent of DLJ as the 137
424B1138th Page of 203TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 138th
lead Underwriter of the Stock Offering. Upon expiration of the applicable lock-up period, the shares covered thereby will be eligible for sale subject to the restrictions contained in the Securities Act and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder, including Rule 144. Sales of substantial amounts of Common Stock in the public market may have an adverse impact on the market price of the shares and could make it more difficult for the Company to sell equity securities in the future at a time and place it deems appropriate. SPECIAL TAX CONSIDERATIONS FOR FOREIGN SHAREHOLDERS The rules governing United States federal income taxation of non-resident alien individuals, foreign corporations, foreign partnerships and foreign trusts and estates (collectively, "Non-U.S. Shareholders") are complex, and the following discussion is intended only as a summary of such rules. Prospective Non-U.S. Shareholders should consult with their own tax advisers to determine the impact of federal, state and local income tax laws on an investment in the Company, including any reporting requirements, as well as the tax treatment of such an investment under their home country laws. In general, Non-U.S. Shareholders will be subject to regular United States federal income tax with respect to their investment in the Company if such investment is "effectively connected" with the Non-U.S. Shareholder's conduct of a trade or business in the United States. A corporate Non-U.S. Shareholder that receives income or gain from the sale or disposition of Common Stock that is (or is treated as) effectively connected with the conduct of a United States trade or business may also be subject to the branch profits tax under Section 884 of the Code, which is payable in addition to regular United States corporate income tax. The following discussion will apply to Non-U.S. Shareholders whose investment in the Company is not so effectively connected. The Company expects to withhold United States federal income tax, as described below, on the gross amount of any distributions paid to a Non-U.S. Shareholder unless (i) a lower treaty rate applies and the required form evidencing eligibility for that reduced rate is filed with the Company or (ii) the Non- U.S. Shareholder files an IRS Form 4224 with the Company, claiming that the distribution is "effectively connected" income. DIVIDENDS Generally, dividends paid by the Company will be subject to a United States withholding tax equal to 30% of the gross amount of the distribution unless such tax is reduced or eliminated by an applicable tax treaty. A distribution of cash in excess of the Company's earnings and profits will be treated first as a return of capital that will reduce a Non-U.S. Shareholder's basis in its shares of the Company's stock (but not below zero) and then as gain from the disposition of such shares, the tax treatment of which is described under the rules discussed below with respect to dispositions of shares. A Non-U.S. Shareholder will have to file refund claims to obtain a refund of tax withheld on distributions in excess of the dividend portion of any distribution. GAIN ON DISPOSITION A Non-U.S. Shareholder will generally not be subject to United States federal income tax on gain recognized on a sale or other disposition of Common Stock unless (i) as noted above, the gain is effectively connected with the conduct of a trade or business within the United States by the Non-U.S. Shareholder, (ii) in the case of a Non-U.S. Shareholder who is a nonresident alien individual and holds the Common Stock as a capital asset, such holder is present in the United States for 183 or more days in the taxable year and certain other requirements are met or (iii) the Non-U.S. Shareholder is subject to tax under the United States real property holding company rules discussed below. The Company may be, or may subsequently become, a United States real property holding company for United States federal income tax purposes because of its ownership of substantial real estate assets in the United 138
424B1139th Page of 203TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 139th
States. If the Company were to be treated as a United States real property holding company, then a Non-U.S. Shareholder who holds, directly or indirectly, more than 5% of Common Stock will be subject to United States federal income taxation on any gain realized from the sale or exchange of such stock, unless an exemption is provided under an applicable treaty. FEDERAL ESTATE TAXES Common Stock owned or treated as owned by an individual who is not a citizen or resident (as specially defined for United States federal estate tax purposes) of the United States at the date of death will be included in such individual's estate for United States federal estate tax purposes, unless an applicable estate tax treaty provides otherwise. INFORMATION REPORTING AND BACKUP WITHHOLDING Under temporary United States Treasury regulations, United States information reporting requirements and backup withholding tax will generally not apply to dividends paid on Common Stock to a Non-U.S. Shareholder at an address outside the United States. Payments by a United States office of a broker of the proceeds of a sale of Common Stock is subject to both backup withholding at a rate of 31% and information reporting unless the holder certifies its Non-U.S. Shareholder status under penalties of perjury or otherwise establishes an exemption. Information reporting requirements (but not backup withholding) will also apply to payments of the proceeds of sales of Common Stock by foreign offices of United States brokers or foreign brokers with certain types of relationships to the United States, unless the broker has documentary evidence in its records that the holder is a Non-U.S. Shareholder and certain other conditions are met, or the holder otherwise establishes an exemption. Any amounts withheld under the backup withholding rules will be refunded or credited against the Non-U.S. Shareholder's United States federal income tax liability, provided that the required information is furnished to the Internal Revenue Service. These information reporting and backup withholding rules are under review by the United States Treasury and their application to Common Stock could be changed by future regulations. 139
424B1140th Page of 203TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 140th
UNDERWRITING Subject to the terms and conditions contained in the Underwriting Agreement, a syndicate of underwriters named below (the "Underwriters"), for whom Donaldson, Lufkin & Jenrette Securities Corporation ("DLJ"), Salomon Brothers Inc, BT Securities Corporation ("BT Securities") and Sands Brothers & Co., Ltd. ("Sands Brothers") are acting as representatives (the "Representatives"), have severally agreed to purchase from the Company an aggregate of 12,500,000 shares of Common Stock. The number of shares of Common Stock that each Underwriter has agreed to purchase is set forth opposite its name below. [Download Table] NUMBER UNDERWRITERS OF SHARES ------------ ---------- Donaldson, Lufkin & Jenrette Securities Corporation............... 2,703,750 Salomon Brothers Inc ............................................. 2,703,750 BT Securities Corporation......................................... 2,703,750 Sands Brothers & Co., Ltd. ....................................... 901,250 Bear, Stearns & Co. Inc. ......................................... 155,000 Cowen & Company................................................... 155,000 Deutsche Morgan Grenfell/C.J. Lawrence Inc. ...................... 155,000 Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated................ 155,000 Schroeder Wertheim & Co. Incorporated............................. 155,000 Advest, Inc. ..................................................... 77,500 Arnhold and S. Bleichroeder, Inc. ................................ 77,500 J. C. Bradford & Co. ............................................. 77,500 J.W. Charles Securities, Inc. .................................... 77,500 The Chicago Corporation........................................... 77,500 Crowell, Weedon & Co. ............................................ 77,500 Doft & Co., Inc. ................................................. 77,500 Fahnestock & Co. Inc. ............................................ 77,500 First Albany Corporation.......................................... 77,500 First of Michigan Corporation..................................... 77,500 Furman Selz LLC................................................... 77,500 Gabelli & Company, Inc. .......................................... 77,500 Gruntal & Co., Incorporated....................................... 77,500 Interstate/Johnson Lane Corporation............................... 77,500 Janney Montgomery Scott Incorporated.............................. 77,500 Johnston, Lemon & Co. Incorporated................................ 77,500 Josephthal, Lyon & Ross, Inc. .................................... 77,500 Ladenburg, Thalmann & Co. Inc. ................................... 77,500 Legg Mason Wood Walker Incorporated............................... 77,500 McDonald & Company Securities, Inc. .............................. 77,500 NatCity Investments, Inc. ........................................ 77,500 The Ohio Company.................................................. 77,500 Parker/Hunter Incorporated........................................ 77,500 Pennsylvania Merchant Group Ltd. ................................. 77,500 Ragen MacKenzie Incorporated...................................... 77,500 Raymond James & Associates, Inc. ................................. 77,500 Roney & Co., LLC.................................................. 77,500 Scott & Stringfellow, Inc. ....................................... 77,500 The Seidler Companies Incorporated................................ 77,500 Stifel, Nicolaus & Company, Incorporated.......................... 77,500 Sutro & Co. Incorporated.......................................... 77,500 Tucker Anthony Incorporated....................................... 77,500 Unterberg Harris.................................................. 77,500 Wedbush Morgan Securities......................................... 77,500 Wheat, First Butcher Singer....................................... 77,500 ---------- Total....................................................... 12,500,000 ========== 140
424B1141st Page of 203TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 141st
The Underwriting Agreement provides that the obligations of the several Underwriters to pay for and accept delivery of the shares of Common Stock offered hereby are subject to approval of certain legal matters by counsel and to certain other conditions. The Underwriters are obligated to take and pay for all the shares of Common Stock offered hereby (other than in connection with the over-allotment option described below) if any are taken. The Representatives have advised the Company that the Underwriters propose to offer the shares of Common Stock directly to the public initially at the public offering price set forth on the cover page of this Prospectus and to certain dealers at such price less a concession not in excess of $1.00 per share. Any Underwriter may allow, and such dealers may reallow, a discount not in excess of $0.10 per share to any other Underwriter and to certain other dealers. After the initial public offering of the shares of Common Stock, the public offering price and other selling terms may be changed by the Representatives. Pursuant to the Underwriting Agreement, the Company has granted to the Underwriters an option, exercisable for 30 days from the date hereof, to purchase up to an additional 1,875,000 shares of Common Stock at the public offering price less the underwriting discounts and commissions set forth on the cover page hereof. The Underwriters may exercise such option to purchase additional shares solely for the purpose of covering over-allotments, if any, made in connection with the sale of the shares of Common Stock offered hereby. To the extent such over-allotment option is exercised, each Underwriter will become obligated, subject to certain conditions, to purchase the same percentage of such additional shares as the number set forth next to such Underwriter's name in the preceding table bears to the total number of shares set forth on the cover page hereof. The Company, certain stockholders and the directors and officers of the Company will agree with the Underwriters not to offer, sell, grant any other option to purchase or otherwise dispose of, directly or indirectly, any shares of Common Stock or any securities convertible into or exercisable or exchangeable for or warrants, rights or options to acquire Common Stock or enter into any agreement to do any of the foregoing for a period of 180 days after the date of this Prospectus without the prior written consent of DLJ. First Fidelity will agree not to sell or otherwise dispose of 425,000 of the 500,000 shares of Common Stock to be received by it for a period of 30 days after the date of this Prospectus without the prior written consent of DLJ. The Company and its direct and indirect subsidiaries have agreed to indemnify the Underwriters against certain liabilities, including liabilities under the Securities Act, or to contribute to payments the Underwriters may be required to make in respect thereof. Each of the Representatives from time to time performs investment banking and other financial services for the Company and its affiliates for which such Representatives receive advisory or transaction fees, as applicable, plus out- of-pocket expenses, of the nature and in amounts customary in the industry for such services. The Representatives (other than Sands Brothers) are also acting as the underwriters for the Mortgage Note Offering. In addition, DLJ has acted as the Company's financial advisor in connection with the Merger Transaction, for which services the Company has agreed to pay DLJ a customary fee for rendering a fairness opinion and a fee upon consummation of the Merger. Following consummation of the Merger Transaction, it is expected that an affiliate of DLJ will become a secured creditor of Trump in connection with a loan proposed to be made to Trump by such DLJ affiliate, for which it will receive a customary fee and reimbursement of its expenses. See "Risk Factors-- Control and Involvement of Trump." Bankers Trust, an affiliate of BT Securities, is a significant secured creditor of Trump and certain of his affiliates other than the Company. Bankers Trust held a $500,000 unsecured demand note owed by Trump Indiana. Following demand by that lender, such amount was paid in full by Trump on June 6, 1995, and is now owed by Trump Indiana to Trump. In connection with the Merger Transaction, Bankers Trust will receive $10 million in respect to the Trump Indebtedness. In exchange for such payment, Bankers Trust will consent to the Merger Transaction and release its lien on Trump's direct and indirect equity interests in Taj Associates and related guarantees, and the pledge of the TTMI Note. Bankers Trust will also receive a pledge of Trump's and TTMI's interests in the Company and THCR Holdings to the extent that certain liens thereon are released. See "Business--Certain Indebtedness--Taj Associates--TTMI Note." 141
424B1142nd Page of 203TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 142nd
LEGAL MATTERS Certain legal matters in connection with the securities offered hereby are being passed upon for the Company by Willkie Farr & Gallagher, New York, New York. Certain legal matters in connection with the securities offered hereby are being passed upon for the Underwriters by Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom, Los Angeles, California. The statements as to matters of law and legal conclusions concerning New Jersey gaming laws included under the captions "Risk Factors--Strict Regulation by Gaming Authorities," and "Regulatory Matters" (other than the subcaption "Other Laws and Regulations") have been prepared by Sterns & Weinroth, Trenton, New Jersey, gaming counsel for the Company. Sterns & Weinroth offers no opinion and does not purport to opine on the application of federal securities laws and regulations or the securities laws and regulations of any state with respect to the securities offered hereby. The statements as to matters of law and legal conclusions concerning Indiana gaming laws included under the captions "Risk Factors--Strict Regulation by Gaming Authorities" and "Regulatory Matters" (other than the subcaption "Other Laws and Regulations") have been prepared by Tabbert Hahn & Zanetis, P.C., Indianapolis, Indiana, gaming counsel for the Company. Tabbert Hahn & Zanetis, P.C. offers no opinion and does not purport to opine on the application of federal securities laws and regulations or the securities laws and regulations of any state with respect to the securities offered hereby. EXPERTS The audited financial statements and schedules of Trump Hotels & Casino Resorts, Inc., Trump Atlantic City Associates and Trump Plaza Associates and Trump Taj Mahal Associates and Subsidiary included in this Prospectus and elsewhere in the Registration Statement have been audited by Arthur Andersen LLP, independent public accountants, as indicated in their reports with respect thereto, and are included herein in reliance upon the authority of said firm as experts in giving said reports. AVAILABLE INFORMATION The Company has filed with the office of the SEC in Washington, D.C. a Registration Statement on Form S-1 (the "Registration Statement") under the Securities Act, with respect to the securities offered hereby. This Prospectus does not contain all of the information set forth in the Registration Statement, certain portions of which have been omitted as permitted by the rules and regulations of the SEC. Such additional information can be inspected at, and obtained from, the SEC in the manner set forth below. For further information pertaining to the securities offered hereby and to the Company, reference is made to the Registration Statement, including the exhibits filed as parts thereof. The Company, THCR Holdings, Plaza Associates, Taj Holding, Taj Funding and Taj Associates are, and Trump AC and Trump AC Funding will be, subject to the informational reporting requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), and, accordingly, have filed, and Trump AC and Trump AC Funding will file, reports and other information with the SEC. Reports, proxy statements and other information of the Company, THCR Holdings, Trump AC, Trump Atlantic City Funding, Plaza Associates, Taj Holding, Taj Funding and Taj Associates filed with the SEC, as well as the Registration Statement, are available for inspection and copying at the public reference facilities maintained by the SEC at Room 1024, 450 Fifth Street, N.W., Washington, DC 20549 and at certain regional offices of the SEC located at Northwestern Atrium Center, 500 West Madison Street, Suite 1400, Chicago, Illinois 60621-2511, and 7 World Trade Center, New York, New York 10048. Copies of such material can be obtained from the Public Reference Section of the SEC, 450 Fifth Street, N.W., Washington, DC 20549 at prescribed rates. It is expected that upon consummation of the Merger Transaction, Plaza Associates, Taj Holding, Taj Funding and Taj Associates will not be subject to the informational reporting requirements of the Exchange Act. The Common Stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange, and reports and other information concerning the Company and THCR Holdings can be inspected at the offices of the New York Stock Exchange, 20 Broad Street, New York, New York 10005. 142
424B1143rd Page of 203TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 143rd
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS [Download Table] PAGE Trump Hotels & Casino Resorts, Inc. Report of Independent Public Accountants................................ F-2 Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 1995...................... F-3 Consolidated Statement of Operations for the period from inception (June 12, 1995) through December 31, 1995.................................... F-4 Consolidated Statement of Stockholders' Equity for the period from inception (June 12, 1995) through December 31, 1995.................... F-5 Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the period from inception (June 12, 1995) through December 31, 1995.................................... F-6 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.............................. F-7 Trump Atlantic City Associates and Trump Plaza Associates Report of Independent Public Accountants................................ F-20 Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 1994 and June 12, 1995... F-21 Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 1993 and 1994 and for the period from January 1, 1995 through June 12, 1995.......... F-22 Consolidated Statements of Capital (Deficit) for the years ended December 31, 1993 and 1994 and for the period from January 1, 1995 through June 12, 1995.......... F-23 Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 1993 and 1994 and for the period from January 1, 1995 through June 12, 1995.......... F-24 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.............................. F-25 Trump Taj Mahal Associates and Subsidiary Report of Independent Public Accountants................................ F-37 Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 1994 and 1995............ F-38 Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 1993, 1994 and 1995.................................................... F-39 Consolidated Statements of Capital (Deficit) for the years ended Decem- ber 31, 1993, 1994 and 1995............................................................... F-40 Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 1993, 1994 and 1995............................................................... F-41 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.............................. F-42 F-1
424B1144th Page of 203TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 144th
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS To Trump Hotels & Casino Resorts, Inc.: We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Trump Hotels & Casino Resorts, Inc. (a Delaware Corporation) and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 1995 and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity and cash flows for the period from inception (June 12, 1995) through December 31, 1995. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the management of Trump Hotels & Casino Resorts, Inc. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Trump Hotels & Casino Resorts, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 1995 and the results of their operations and their cash flows for the period from inception (June 12, 1995) through December 31, 1995, in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. Arthur Andersen LLP Roseland, New Jersey February 21, 1996 F-2
424B1145th Page of 203TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 145th
TRUMP HOTELS & CASINO RESORTS, INC. CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET DECEMBER 31, 1995 [Download Table] ASSETS CURRENT ASSETS: Cash & cash equivalents....................................... $ 19,208,000 Restricted cash (Note 8)...................................... 12,013,000 Trade receivables, net of allowances for doubtful accounts of $8,077,000................................................... 7,576,000 Accounts receivable, other (Note 6)........................... 6,884,000 Inventories................................................... 2,609,000 Prepaid expenses and other current assets..................... 5,171,000 ------------- Total current assets........................................ 53,461,000 ------------- INVESTMENT IN BUFFINGTON HARBOR (Note 10)....................... 21,823,000 PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT (Notes 4, 6 and 8): Land and land improvements.................................... 48,308,000 Buildings and building improvements........................... 350,366,000 Furniture, fixtures and equipment............................. 91,033,000 Leasehold improvements........................................ 2,434,000 Construction in progress...................................... 63,379,000 Less--accumulated depreciation and amortization............... (147,289,000) ------------- Net property and equipment.................................. 408,231,000 ------------- CASH RESTRICTED FOR FUTURE CONSTRUCTION (Note 8)................ 40,030,000 LAND RIGHTS, net of accumulated amortization of $4,149,000 (Note 2)............................................................. 29,320,000 NOTE RECEIVABLE (Note 9)........................................ 3,000,000 DEFERRED LOAN COSTS, net of accumulated amortization of $5,827,000..................................................... 20,026,000 OTHER ASSETS.................................................... 8,654,000 ------------- Total assets................................................ $ 584,545,000 ============= LIABILITIES & CAPITAL CURRENT LIABILITIES: Current maturities of long-term debt (Note 3)................. $ 2,901,000 Accounts payable.............................................. 9,478,000 Accrued payroll............................................... 6,815,000 Accrued interest payable ..................................... 2,498,000 Due to affiliates (Note 8).................................... 278,000 Other accrued expenses........................................ 6,924,000 Self insurance reserves....................................... 3,750,000 Other current liabilities..................................... 2,658,000 ------------- Total current liabilities................................... 35,302,000 NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES: Long-term debt, net of current maturities (Note 3)............ 494,471,000 Deferred income taxes......................................... 4,181,000 ------------- Total liabilities........................................... 533,954,000 ------------- COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (Notes 6, 8 and 10) STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY Preferred Stock, $1.00 par value, 1,000,000 shares authorized, none issued and outstanding.................................. -- Common Stock $.01 par value, 50,000,000 shares authorized, 10,066,667 issued and outstanding............................ 101,000 Class B Common Stock $.01 par value 1,000 shares authorized, issued and outstanding -- Additional paid-in capital.................................... 52,411,000 Accumulated deficit........................................... (1,921,000) ------------- Total stockholders' equity.................................. 50,591,000 ------------- Total liabilities & stockholders' equity.................... $ 584,545,000 ============= The accompanying notes to financial statements are an integral part of this consolidated financial statement. F-3
424B1146th Page of 203TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 146th
TRUMP HOTELS & CASINO RESORTS, INC. CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE PERIOD FROM INCEPTION (JUNE 12, 1995) THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 1995 [Download Table] REVENUES: Gaming......................................................... $175,208,000 Rooms.......................................................... 12,310,000 Food and Beverage.............................................. 26,065,000 Other.......................................................... 6,284,000 ------------ Gross Revenues............................................... 219,867,000 Less--Promotional allowances................................... 24,394,000 ------------ Net Revenues................................................. 195,473,000 ------------ COSTS AND EXPENSES: Gaming......................................................... 95,533,000 Rooms.......................................................... 1,305,000 Food and Beverage.............................................. 11,178,000 General and Administrative..................................... 42,826,000 Depreciation and Amortization.................................. 9,219,000 Other.......................................................... 1,966,000 ------------ 162,027,000 ------------ Income from operations....................................... 33,446,000 ------------ NON-OPERATING INCOME AND (EXPENSES): Interest income................................................ 3,741,000 Interest expense............................................... (35,014,000) Other non-operating expense.................................... (4,094,000) ------------ (35,367,000) ------------ Net loss......................................................... $ (1,921,000) ============ Loss Per Share................................................... $ (.19) ============ Average Number of Shares Outstanding............................. 10,133,333 ============ The accompanying notes to financial statements are an integral part of this consolidated financial statement. F-4
424B1147th Page of 203TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 147th
TRUMP HOTELS & CASINO RESORTS, INC. CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY FOR THE PERIOD FROM INCEPTION (JUNE 12, 1995) THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 1995 [Enlarge/Download Table] NUMBER OF SHARES ------------------ ADDITIONAL CLASS B PAID IN ACCUMULATED COMMON COMMON AMOUNT CAPITAL DEFICIT TOTAL ---------- ------- -------- ------------ ----------- ------------ Balance, June 12, 1995.. 1,000 $ -- $(75,543,000) $ -- $(75,543,000) Proceeds from issuance of Common Stock........ 10,000,000 -- 100,000 126,748,000 -- 126,848,000 Issuance of Stock Grant Award.................. 66,667 -- 1,000 933,000 -- 934,000 Accretion of Phantom Stock Units............ -- -- -- 273,000 -- 273,000 Net Loss................ -- -- -- -- (1,921,000) (1,921,000) ---------- ----- -------- ------------ ----------- ------------ Balance, December 31, 1995................... 10,066,667 1,000 $101,000 $ 52,411,000 $(1,921,000) $ 50,591,000 ========== ===== ======== ============ =========== ============ The accompanying notes to financial statements are an integral part of this consolidated financial statement. F-5
424B1148th Page of 203TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 148th
TRUMP HOTELS & CASINO RESORTS, INC. CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS FOR THE PERIOD FROM INCEPTION (JUNE 12, 1995) THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 1995 [Download Table] CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: Net loss....................................................... $ (1,921,000) Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash flows used in operating activities: Non Cash Charges: Issuance of stock grant awards and phantom stock units....... 1,207,000 Depreciation and amortization................................ 9,219,000 Accretion of discount on mortgage notes and amortization of loan costs.................................................. 818,000 Provisions for losses on receivables......................... 559,000 Deferred income taxes........................................ 161,000 Utilization of CRDA credits and donations.................... 320,000 Valuation allowance of CRDA investments...................... (1,249,000) ------------- Sub-total................................................... 9,114,000 Increase in receivables...................................... (1,722,000) Decrease in inventories...................................... 815,000 Increase in advances from affiliates......................... 367,000 Decrease in other current assets............................. 6,518,000 Decrease in other assets..................................... 346,000 Decrease in accounts payable, accrued expenses, and other current liabilities......................................... (5,123,000) Decrease in accrued interest payable......................... (19,534,000) ------------- Net cash flows used in operating activities................. (9,219,000) ------------- CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: Purchase of property and equipment, net........................ (115,430,000) Restricted cash for short-term operating needs................. (12,013,000) Cash restricted for future construction........................ (40,030,000) Purchase of CRDA investments................................... (1,677,000) Investment in Buffington Harbor LLC............................ (21,823,000) ------------- Net cash flows used in investing activities................. (190,973,000) ------------- CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: Issuance of Common Stock, net.................................. 126,848,000 Issuance of Senior Secured Notes, net.......................... 144,258,000 Retirement of PIK Notes........................................ (81,746,000) Issuance of note receivable.................................... (3,000,000) Payment of current maturities of long term debt................ (4,186,000) Additional Borrowings.......................................... 9,040,000 ------------- Net cash flows provided by financing activities............. 191,214,000 ------------- Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents....................... (8,978,000) ------------- CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT BEGINNING OF PERIOD................ 28,186,000 ============= CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT DECEMBER 31, 1995.................. $ 19,208,000 ============= The accompanying notes to financial statements are an integral part of this consolidated financial statement. F-6
424B1149th Page of 203TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 149th
TRUMP HOTELS & CASINO RESORTS, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS DECEMBER 31, 1995 (1) ORGANIZATION AND OPERATIONS Trump Hotels & Casino Resorts, Inc. ("THCR"), which commenced operations on June 12, 1995, was formed on March 28, 1995 to own and operate the Trump Plaza Hotel and Casino ("Trump Plaza"), a luxury casino hotel located on The Boardwalk in Atlantic City, New Jersey. In addition, THCR, through Trump Indiana, Inc. ("Trump Indiana"), a wholly owned subsidiary of Trump Hotels & Casino Resorts Holdings, L.P. ("THCR Holdings"), approximately 60.2% owned by THCR , is in the process of developing a riverboat gaming facility at Buffington Harbor, Indiana (the "Indiana Riverboat"). THCR, through THCR Holdings and its subsidiaries, will be the exclusive vehicle through which Donald J. Trump ("Trump") will engage in new gaming activities in emerging or established gaming jurisdictions. The accompanying consolidated financial statements include those of THCR and THCR Holdings and its subsidiaries, Trump Atlantic City Associates ("Trump AC"), Trump Indiana, Trump Plaza Funding, Inc. ("Plaza Funding") and Trump Plaza Holding, Inc. ("Plaza Holding Inc."). Trump AC is the parent of Trump Plaza Associates ("Plaza Associates"), which owns and operates Trump Plaza. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in the accompanying consolidated financial statements. On June 12, 1995, THCR completed a public offering of 10,000,000 shares of its common stock (the "THCR Common Stock") at $14.00 per share (the "June 1995 Stock Offering") for gross proceeds of $140,000,000. Concurrently with the June 1995 Stock Offering, THCR Holdings, together with its subsidiary, Trump Hotels & Casino Resorts Funding, Inc. ("THCR Funding"), issued 15 1/2% Senior Secured Notes due 2005 (the "Senior Notes") for gross proceeds of $155,000,000 (the "June 1995 Note Offering" and, together with the June 1995 Stock Offering, the "June 1995 Offerings"). THCR contributed the gross proceeds of the June 1995 Stock Offering to THCR Holdings. Prior to the June 1995 Offerings, Trump was the sole stockholder of THCR and sole beneficial owner of THCR Holdings. Concurrent with the June 1995 Offerings, Trump contributed to THCR Holdings all of his beneficial interest in Plaza Associates, which consisted of all of the outstanding capital stock of Plaza Funding, a 99% equity interest in Trump AC and all of the outstanding capital stock of Plaza Holding Inc., which owns the remaining 1% equity interest in Trump AC. Trump also contributed all of his existing interests and rights to new gaming activities in both emerging and established gaming jurisdictions, including Trump Indiana but excluding his interests in the Trump Taj Mahal Casino Resort (the "Taj Mahal") and Trump's Castle Casino Resort, to THCR Holdings. In exchange for Trump's contributions to THCR Holdings, Trump received an approximately 39.8% limited partnership interest in THCR Holdings. The proceeds of the June 1995 Stock Offering were contributed by THCR to THCR Holdings in exchange for an approximate 60.2% general partnership interest in THCR Holdings. Trump's limited partnership interest in THCR Holdings represents his economic interest in the assets and operations of THCR Holdings. Accordingly, such limited partnership interest is convertible at Trump's option into 6,666,667 shares of THCR Common Stock (subject to certain adjustments) representing approximately 39.8% of the outstanding shares of THCR Common Stock. Trump received shares of Class B Common Stock of THCR (the "THCR Class B Common Stock"). The THCR Class B Common Stock votes together with the THCR Common Stock as a single class on all matters submitted to stockholders of THCR for a vote or in respect of which consents are solicited (other than in connection with certain amendments to THCR's Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation). The number of votes represented by the THCR Class B Common Stock held by any holder is equal to the number of shares of THCR Common Stock issuable to the holder upon conversion of such holder's partnership interest in THCR Holdings into THCR Common Stock. Upon such conversion, the corresponding voting power of shares of THCR Class B Common Stock provides Trump with a voting F-7
424B1150th Page of 203TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 150th
TRUMP HOTELS & CASINO RESORTS, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED) DECEMBER 31, 1995 interest in THCR which is proportionate to his equity interest in THCR Holdings' assets represented by his limited partnership interest. Except for the right to receive par value upon liquidation, the THCR Class B Common Stock has no right to receive any dividend or other distribution in respect of the equity of THCR. In addition, Trump has agreed to waive (except as set forth under the Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of THCR) state law rights to vote the THCR Class B Common Stock as a separate class in the event of merger or sale of substantial assets. (2) SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES ORGANIZATION AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION THCR, through its subsidiaries operates, Trump Plaza, a luxury casino hotel, located on The Boardwalk in Atlantic City which provides high quality amenities and services to its casino patrons and hotel guests. A substantial portion of Trump Plaza's revenues are derived from its gaming operations and in the past Trump Plaza has targeted the higher-end drive-in slot customer. Competition in the Atlantic City casino total market is intense and management believes that this competition will continue as more casinos are opened and new entrants into the gaming industry become operational. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. REVENUE RECOGNITION Gaming revenues represent the net win from gaming activities which is the difference between amounts wagered and amounts won by patrons. Revenues from hotel and other services are recognized at the time the related service is performed. THCR provides an allowance for doubtful accounts arising from casino, hotel and other services, which is based upon a specific review of certain outstanding receivables as well as historical collection information. In determining the amount of the allowance, management is required to make certain estimates and assumptions regarding the timing and amount of collection. Actual results could differ from those estimates and assumptions. PROMOTIONAL ALLOWANCES The retail value of accommodations, food, beverage and other services provided to customers without charge is included in gross revenue and deducted as promotional allowances. The estimated departmental costs of providing such promotional allowances are included in gaming costs and expenses as follows: [Download Table] FROM INCEPTION TO DECEMBER 31, 1995 ------------ Rooms......................................................... $ 3,075,000 Food and Beverage............................................. 10,301,000 Other......................................................... 2,574,000 ----------- $15,950,000 =========== F-8
424B1151st Page of 203TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 151st
TRUMP HOTELS & CASINO RESORTS, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED) DECEMBER 31, 1995 INVENTORIES Inventories of provisions and supplies are carried at the lower of cost (weighted average) or market. PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT Property and equipment is carried at cost and is depreciated on the straight- line method using rates based on the following estimated useful lives: [Download Table] Buildings and building improvements............................ 40 years Furniture, fixtures and equipment.............................. 3-10 years Leasehold improvements......................................... 10-40 years Interest of $88,000 associated with borrowings used to finance construction projects has been capitalized and is being amortized over the estimated useful lives of the assets. LAND RIGHTS Land rights represent the fair value of such rights at the time of contribution to Plaza Associates by the Trump Plaza Corporation, an affiliate of the Plaza Associates. These rights are being amortized over the period of the underlying operating leases which extend through 2078. LONG LIVED ASSETS During 1995, THCR adopted the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 121 "Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets" ("SFAS No. 121"). SFAS No. 121 requires, among other things, that an entity review its long-lived assets and certain related intangibles for impairment whenever changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be fully recoverable. Impairment of long-lived assets exist, if, at a minimum, the future expected cash flows (undiscounted and without interest charges) from an entity's operations are less than the carrying value of these assets. As a result of its review, THCR does not believe that any impairment exists in the recoverability of its long-lived assets. INCOME TAXES Income taxes are recorded under the provision of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 109, "Accounting for Income Taxes" ("SFAS No. 109"). SFAS No. 109 requires recognition of deferred tax liabilities and assets for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been included in the financial statements or tax returns. Under this method, deferred tax liabilities and assets are determined based on the difference between the financial statement and the tax basis of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse. Under the New Jersey Casino Control Commission (the "CCC") regulations, Plaza Associates is required to file a New Jersey corporation business tax return. As of December 31, 1995, Trump AC and Plaza Associates has state tax net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $31,000,000 which are available to offset future state taxable income. Such carryforwards expire from 1997 to 2001. The net operating loss carryforwards result in a deferred tax asset of $2,800,000 which has been offset by a valuation allowance of $2,800,000 as utilization of such carryforwards is not considered to be more likely than not. Plaza Associates' deferred state income taxes result primarily from differences in the timing of reporting depreciation for tax and financial statement purposes. F-9
424B1152nd Page of 203TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 152nd
TRUMP HOTELS & CASINO RESORTS, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED) DECEMBER 31, 1995 STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS For purposes of the statement of cash flows, THCR considers all highly liquid debt instruments purchased with a maturity of three months or less at the time of acquisition to be cash equivalents. The following supplemental disclosures are made to the statements of cash flows. [Download Table] 1995 ----------- Cash paid during the year for interest........................ $48,786,000 =========== Cash paid for state and Federal income taxes.................. $ -- =========== EARNINGS PER SHARE Earnings per share is based on the weighted average number of shares of common stock and common stock equivalents outstanding (unless antidilutive), including shares granted to the President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer (See Note 5). The shares of the THCR Class B Common Stock owned by Trump have no economic interest and are therefore not considered in the calculation of weighted average shares outstanding. Stock options have not been considered since their effect would be antidilutive. MINORITY INTEREST As there is no minority interest basis in THCR Holdings as of December 31, 1995, no benefit relating to minority interest in THCR Holdings' loss has been reflected. (3) LONG-TERM DEBT Long-term debt consists of the following: [Download Table] DECEMBER 31, 1995 ------------ 10 7/8% Mortgage Notes due 2001 net of unamortized discount of $3,348,000 (A)............................................... $326,652,000 15 1/2% Senior Secured Notes due 2005 (B)..................... 155,000,000 Mortgage notes payable (C).................................... 2,953,000 Other (D)..................................................... 12,767,000 ------------ 497,372,000 Less--Current maturities...................................... 2,901,000 ------------ $494,471,000 ============ --------------------- (A) On June 25, 1993, Plaza Funding issued $330,000,000 principal amount of 10 7/8% Mortgage Notes, due 2001 (the "Plaza Notes"), net of discount of $4,313,000 and loaned the proceeds to Plaza Associates. Net proceeds of the offering were used to redeem all of Plaza Funding's outstanding $225,000,000 principal amount 12% Mortgage Bonds, due 2002 and together with other funds (see (B)) to redeem all of Plaza Funding's stock units, comprised of $75,000,000 liquidation preference participating cumulative redeemable Preferred Stock with associated shares of Common Stock, to repay $17,500,000 principal amount 9.14% Regency Notes due 2003, to make a portion of a distribution to Trump to pay certain personal indebtedness, and to pay transaction expenses. The Plaza Notes mature on June 15, 2001 and are redeemable at any time on or after June 15, 1998, at the option of Plaza Funding or Plaza Associates in whole or in part, at the principal amount plus a premium which declines ratably each year to zero in the year of maturity. The Plaza Notes bear interest at the stated rate of 10 7/8% per annum from the date of issuance, payable semi-annually F-10
424B1153rd Page of 203TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 153rd
TRUMP HOTELS & CASINO RESORTS, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED) DECEMBER 31, 1995 on each June 15 and December 15, commencing December 15, 1993 and are secured by substantially all of Plaza Associates' assets. The accompanying consolidated financial statements reflect interest expense at the effective interest rate of 11.12% per annum. The indenture governing the Plaza Notes (the "Plaza Note Indenture") contains certain covenants limiting the ability of Plaza Associates to incur indebtedness, including indebtedness secured by liens on Trump Plaza. In addition, Plaza Associates may, under certain circumstances, incur up to $25,000,000 of indebtedness to finance the expansion of its facilities, which indebtedness may be secured by a lien on Trump Plaza East (see Note 6) senior to the liens of one of the Plaza Mortgages (the "Plaza Note Mortgage") and another of the Plaza Mortgages (the "Plaza Guarantee Mortgage"). The Plaza Notes represent the senior indebtedness of Plaza Funding. The note from Plaza Associates to Plaza Funding in the same principle amount of the Plaza Notes (the "Plaza Associates Note") and the guarantee of the Plaza Notes (the "Plaza Guarantee") rank pari passu in right of payment with all existing and future senior indebtedness of Plaza Associates. The Plaza Notes, the Plaza Associates Note, the Plaza Note Mortgage, the Plaza Guarantee and the Plaza Guarantee Mortgage are non-recourse to the partners of Plaza Associates, to the shareholders of Plaza Funding and to all other persons and entities (other than Plaza Funding and Plaza Associates), including Trump. Upon an event of default, holders of the Plaza Notes would have recourse only to the assets of Plaza Funding and Plaza Associates. (B) On June 12, 1995, THCR Holdings and THCR Funding issued $155,000,000 principal amount of Senior Notes. The Senior Notes are redeemable in cash at the option of THCR Holdings and THCR Funding, in whole or in part, at any time on or after June 15, 2000 at redemption prices, as defined. Interest on these notes is payable semi-annually in arrears on June 15 and December 15 of each year, commencing December 15, 1995, and are secured by substantially all of the assets of THCR Holdings. Costs associated with the issuance of these notes totalling approximately $10,742,000 have been deferred and are being amortized over the life of the Senior Notes. (C) Interest on these notes are payable with interest rates ranging from 10.0% to 11.0%. The notes are due at various dates between 1996 and 1998 and are secured by real property. The aggregate maturities of long-term debt in each of the years subsequent to 1995 are: [Download Table] 1996.................................................... $ 2,901,000 1997.................................................... 4,503,000 1998.................................................... 1,196,000 1999.................................................... 274,000 2000.................................................... 96,000 Thereafter.............................................. 491,750,000(1) ------------ $500,720,000 ============ --------------------- (1) Includes accretion to maturity of $3,348,000. However, this does not give effect to the proposed Merger Transaction (See Note 12). (D) Interest on these notes and leases are payable with interest rates ranging from 7.9% to 13.5%. The notes and leases are due at various dates between 1996 and 2000 and are secured by equipment. The ability of Plaza Associates and Plaza Funding to repay their long- term debt when due will depend on their ability to either generate cash from operations sufficient for such purposes or to refinance such indebtedness. Management does not currently anticipate that cash flow will be sufficient and that repayment will likely depend upon the ability to refinance such indebtedness. The future operating performance and the ability to refinance such indebtedness will be subject to the then prevailing economic conditions, industry conditions and numerous other financial, business F-11
424B1154th Page of 203TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 154th
TRUMP HOTELS & CASINO RESORTS, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED) DECEMBER 31, 1995 and other factors, many of which are beyond the control of Plaza Funding or Plaza Associates. There can be no assurance that the future operating performance of Plaza Associates will be sufficient to meet these repayment obligations or that the general state of the economy, the status of the capital markets generally or the receptiveness of the capital markets to the gaming industry will be conducive to refinancing or other attempts to raise capital. (4) LEASES THCR leases property (primarily land), certain parking space, and various equipment under operating leases. Rent expense for 1995 was $2,751,000, of which $1,275,000 was paid to affiliates of Plaza Associates. Future minimum lease payments under the noncancelable operating leases are as follows: [Download Table] AMOUNTS RELATING TO TOTAL AFFILIATES ------------ ------------ 1996............................................. $ 7,013,000 $ 2,450,000 1997............................................. 7,015,000 2,494,000 1998............................................. 5,370,000 2,494,000 1999............................................. 3,649,000 2,450,000 2000............................................. 3,647,000 2,525,000 Thereafter....................................... 484,507,000 404,925,000 ------------ ------------ $511,201,000 $417,338,000 ============ ============ Certain of these leases contain options to purchase the leased properties at various prices throughout the leased terms. In October 1993, Plaza Associates assumed the lease to Trump of Trump Plaza East (the "Trump Plaza East Lease") and related expenses which are included in the above lease commitment amounts. On June 25, 1993, Plaza Associates acquired a five-year option to purchase Trump Plaza East (See Note 6). (5) STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN In connection with the June 1995 Offerings, the Board of Directors of THCR (the "Board of Directors") adopted the 1995 Stock Incentive Plan (the "1995 Stock Plan"). Pursuant to the 1995 Stock Plan, directors, employees and consultants of THCR and certain of its subsidiaries and affiliates who have been selected as participants are eligible to receive awards of various forms of equity-based incentive compensation, including stock options, stock appreciation rights, stock bonuses, restricted stock awards, performance units and phantom stock, and awards consisting of combinations of such incentives. The 1995 Stock Plan is administered by a committee appointed by the Board of Directors (the "Stock Incentive Plan Committee"). Options granted under the 1995 Stock Plan may be incentive stock options ("ISO"), within the meaning of Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code"), or nonqualified stock options ("NQSOs"). The vesting, exercisability and exercise price of the options are determined by the Stock Incentive Plan Committee when the options are granted, subject to a minimum price, in the case of ISOs, of the Fair Market Value (as defined in the 1995 Stock Plan) of THCR Common Stock on the date of the grant and a minimum price, in the case of NQSOs, of the par value of THCR Common Stock. The 1995 Stock Plan permits the Stock Incentive Plan Committee to grant stock appreciation rights ("SARs") either alone or in connection with an option. An SAR granted as an alternative or a supplement to F-12
424B1155th Page of 203TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 155th
TRUMP HOTELS & CASINO RESORTS, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED) DECEMBER 31, 1995 a related stock option will entitle its holder to be paid an amount equal to the fair market value of THCR Common Stock subject to the SAR on the date of exercise of the SAR, less the exercise price of the related stock option or such other price as the Stock Incentive Plan Committee may determine at the time of the grant of the SAR (which may not be less than the lowest price which the Stock Incentive Plan Committee may determine under the 1995 Stock Plan for such stock option). The 1995 Stock Plan also provides that phantom stock and performance unit awards may be settled in cash, at the discretion of the Stock Incentive Plan Committee and if indicated in the applicable award agreement, on each date on which shares of THCR Common Stock covered by the awards would otherwise have been delivered or become unrestricted, in an amount equal to the fair market value of the shares on such date. Subject to adjustment in the event of changes in the outstanding stock or the capital structure of THCR, THCR has reserved 1,000,000 shares of THCR Common Stock for issuance under the 1995 Stock Plan. In connection with the June 1995 Offerings, the Stock Incentive Plan Committee granted to the President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of THCR a stock bonus award of 66,667 shares of THCR Common Stock under the 1995 Stock Plan, which was fully vested upon issuance. Compensation expense of approximately $934,000 associated with the stock bonus award is reflected in the accompanying statement of operations of THCR. A phantom stock unit award was also issued to the President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of THCR. This award entitles the President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of THCR to receive 66,667 shares of THCR Common Stock two years following such award, subject to certain conditions. The compensation expense associated with the phantom stock award is approximately $933,000 and this amount is being amortized over the two-year vesting period and was approximately $273,000 for the period from inception to December 31, 1995. The President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of THCR also received an award of NQSOs for the purchase of 133,333 shares of THCR Common Stock, subject to certain conditions (including vesting at a rate of 20% per year over a five-year period). The options have an exercise price of $14.00 per share. In 1995, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 "Accounting for Stock Based Compensation." The new standard specifies permissible methods of valuing compensation attributable to stock options as well as certain required disclosures. THCR is required to adopt the new standard no later than December 31, 1996. THCR has not yet determined which method it will follow for measuring compensation cost attributable to stock options or the impact of the new standard on its consolidated financial statements. (6) COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES CASINO LICENSE RENEWAL The operation of an Atlantic City hotel and casino is subject to significant regulatory controls which affect virtually all of its operations. Under the New Jersey Casino Control Act (the "Casino Control Act"), Plaza Associates is required to maintain certain licenses. In June 1995, the CCC renewed Plaza Associates, license to operate Trump Plaza. This license must be renewed in June 1999, is not transferable and will require a determination of the financial stability of Plaza Associates. Upon revocation, suspension for more than 120 days, or failure to renew the casino license, the Casino Control Act provides for the mandatory appointment of a conservator to take possession of the hotel and casino's business and property, subject to all valid liens, claims and encumbrances. F-13
424B1156th Page of 203TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 156th
TRUMP HOTELS & CASINO RESORTS, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED) DECEMBER 31, 1995 LEGAL PROCEEDINGS THCR and certain of its employees, have been involved in various legal proceedings. In general, THCR has agreed to indemnify such persons against any and all losses, claims, damages, expenses (including reasonable costs, disbursements and counsel fees) and liabilities (including amounts paid or incurred in satisfaction of settlements, judgements, fines and penalties) incurred by them in said legal proceedings. Various legal proceedings are now pending against THCR. THCR considers all such proceedings to be ordinary litigation incident to the character of its business. THCR believes that the resolution of these claims will not, individually or in the aggregate, have a material adverse effect on its financial condition or results of operations. Plaza Associates is also a party to various administrative proceedings involving allegations that it has violated certain provisions of the Casino Control Act. THCR believes that the final outcome of these proceedings will not, either individually or in the aggregate, have a material adverse effect on its financial condition, results of operations or on the ability of Plaza Associates to otherwise retain or renew any casino or other licenses required under the Casino Control Act for the operation of Trump Plaza. SELF INSURANCE RESERVES Self insurance reserves represent the estimated amount of uninsured claims related to employee health medical costs, workmen's compensation and personal injury claims that have occurred in the normal course of business. These reserves are established by management based upon a specific review of open claims, with consideration of incurred but not reported claims as of the balance sheet date. Actual results may differ from these reserve amounts. CASINO REINVESTMENT DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OBLIGATIONS Pursuant to the provisions of the Casino Control Act, Plaza Associates, commencing in 1991 after the date of opening of Trump Plaza in May 1984, and continuing for a period of thirty years thereafter, must either obtain investment tax credits (as defined in the Casino Control Act), in an amount equivalent to 1.25% of its gross casino revenues, or pay an alternative tax of 2.5% of its gross casino revenues, (as defined in the Casino Control Act). Investment tax credits may be obtained by making qualified investments or by depositing funds which may be converted to bonds by the Casino Reinvestment Development Authority (the "CRDA"), both of which bear interest at below market interest rates. Plaza Associates is required to make quarterly deposits with the CRDA based on 1.25% of its gross revenue. For the period from inception (June 12, 1995) through December 31, 1995, THCR charged to operations $670,000, to give effect to the below market interest rates associated with CRDA bonds that have either been issued or are expected to be issued from funds deposited. Additionally, for the period from inception (June 12, 1995) through December 31, 1995, THCR credited operations for $1,737,000 resulting from the recapture of the valuation allowance on the CRDA receivable. Bonds issued by the CRDA will be accounted for under SFAS No. 121, as such bonds are not marketable. In connection with Trump Plaza East (see below), the CRDA has approved the use of up to $14,135,000 in deposits made by Plaza Associates for site improvements. At December 31, 1995, Plaza Associates has recorded a receivable from the CRDA of $6,022,000 which is included in Accounts Receivable, Other. A lawsuit has been filed to prevent the CRDA from returning to Plaza Associates such deposits. Although the court has ruled that such deposits cannot be returned, Plaza Associates has appealed this decision. Management believes that this decision will be overturned. In the event that the decision is not overturned, the receivable will be reclassified as a CRDA deposit and a charge to operations of approximately $2,000,000 would be required to reestablish the valuation allowance. F-14
424B1157th Page of 203TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 157th
TRUMP HOTELS & CASINO RESORTS, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED) DECEMBER 31, 1995 CONCENTRATIONS OF CREDIT RISKS In accordance with casino industry practice, Plaza Associates extends credit to a limited number of casino patrons, after extensive background checks and investigations of credit worthiness. At December 31, 1995, approximately 27% of Plaza Associates' casino receivables (before allowances) were from customers whose primary residence is outside the United States with no significant concentration in any one foreign country. TRUMP PLAZA EAST In 1993, Plaza Associates received the approval of the CCC, subject to certain conditions, for the expansion of its hotel facilities at Trump Plaza East. On June 24, 1993, in connection with the 1993 refinancing of Trump Plaza, (i) Trump transferred title to Trump Plaza East to Missouri Boardwalk, Inc. ("Boardwalk"), a wholly owned subsidiary of Midlantic National Bank ("Midlantic"), in exchange for a reduction in indebtedness to Midlantic in an amount equal to the sum of the fair market value of Trump Plaza East and all rent payments made to Boardwalk by Trump under the Trump Plaza East Lease, (ii) Boardwalk leased Trump Plaza East to Trump under the Trump Plaza East Lease for a term of five years, which expires on June 30, 1998, during which time Trump was obligated to pay Boardwalk $260,000 per month in lease payments, and (iii) Plaza Associates acquired a five-year option to purchase Trump Plaza East (the "Trump Plaza East Purchase Option"). In October 1993, Plaza Associates assumed the Trump Plaza East Lease and related expenses. In addition, Plaza Associates has a right of first refusal (the "Right of First Offer") upon any proposed sale of all or any portion of the fee interest in Trump Plaza East during the term of the Trump Plaza East Purchase Option. Acquisition of Trump Plaza East by Plaza Associates would under certain circumstances (provided there are no events of default under the Trump Plaza East Lease or the Trump Plaza East Purchase Option and provided that certain other events had not theretofore or do not thereafter occur) discharge Trump's obligation to Midlantic in full. Until such time as the Trump Plaza East Purchase Option is exercised or expires, Plaza Associates will be obligated, from and after the date it entered into the Trump Plaza East Purchase Option, to pay the net expenses associated with Trump Plaza East. During 1995, THCR incurred approximately $2,340,000 of such expenses of which $2,045,000 are included in non-operating expenses in the accompanying consolidated financial statements. Under the Trump Plaza East Purchase Option, Plaza Associates has the right to acquire Trump Plaza East for a purchase price of $28,000,000 through 1996, increasing by $1,000,000 annually thereafter until expiration on June 30, 1998. The CCC has required that Plaza Associates exercise the Trump Plaza East Purchase Option or its right of first refusal no later than July 1, 1996. If Plaza Associates defaults in making payments due under the Trump Plaza East Purchase Option, Plaza Associates would be liable to the lender for the sum of (a) the present value of all remaining payments to be made by Plaza Associates pursuant to the Trump Plaza East Purchase Option during the term thereof and (b) the cost of demolition of all improvements then located on Trump Plaza East. Plaza Associates has commenced construction at Trump Plaza East pursuant to rights granted to Plaza Associates by its lessor. Plaza Associates has received approximately $1,519,000 in CRDA credit as of December 31, 1995. As of December 31, 1995, Plaza Associates had capitalized approximately $35,700,000 in construction costs related to Trump Plaza East including a $1,000,000 consulting fee paid to Trump (See Note 8). Plaza Associates' ability to acquire Trump Plaza East pursuant to the Trump Plaza East Purchase Option is dependent upon its ability to obtain financing to acquire the property. The ability to incur such indebtedness is restricted by the Plaza Note Indenture. Plaza Associates' ability to purchase Trump Plaza East is dependent upon its ability to use existing cash on hand and generate cash flow from operations sufficient to fund development costs. No assurance can be given that such cash on hand will be available to F-15
424B1158th Page of 203TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 158th
TRUMP HOTELS & CASINO RESORTS, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED) DECEMBER 31, 1995 Plaza Associates for such purposes or that it will be able to generate sufficient cash flow from operations. In connection with the Merger Transaction (as defined) (See Note 12), Plaza Associates expects to exercise the Trump Plaza East Purchase Option. The accompanying consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that may be necessary should Plaza Associates be unable to exercise the Trump Plaza East Purchase Option. (7) EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS Plaza Associates has a retirement savings plan (the "Plan") for its nonunion employees under Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code. Employees are eligible to contribute up to 15% of their earnings to the Plan and Plaza Associates will match 50% of an eligible employee's contributions up to a maximum of 4% of the employee's earnings. In connection with this Plan, THCR recorded charges of $410,000 in 1995. Plaza Associates provides no other material post-retirement or post- employment benefits. (8) TRANSACTIONS WITH AFFILIATES DUE TO/FROM AFFILIATES Plaza Associates leases warehouse facility space to Trump's Castle Associates. Lease payments of $4,000 were received from Trump's Castle Associates in 1995. Plaza Associates leases two parcels of land under long-term ground leases from Seashore Four Associates and Trump Seashore Associates. In 1995, THCR expensed $553,000 to Seashore Four Associates and paid $723,000 to Trump Seashore Associates. SERVICES AGREEMENT Pursuant to the terms of a services agreement with Trump Plaza Management Corp. ("TPM"), a corporation beneficially owned by Trump, in consideration for services provided, Plaza Associates pays TPM each year an annual fee of $1,000,000 in equal monthly installments and reimburses TPM on a monthly basis for all reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred by TPM in performing its obligations under such services agreement, up to certain amounts. Under this agreement, THCR charged approximately $718,000 to expense in 1995. EXECUTIVE AGREEMENT Trump serves as the Chairman of the Board of Directors pursuant to an Executive Agreement entered into between Trump, THCR and THCR Holdings (the "Executive Agreement"). In consideration for Trump's services under the Executive Agreement, Trump receives a salary of $1,000,000 per year, payable in equal monthly installments. EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT Nicholas L. Ribis ("Ribis"), the President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of THCR entered into a five-year employment agreement (the "Revised Ribis Agreement") with THCR and THCR Holdings on June 12, 1995. Pursuant to the Revised Ribis Agreement, Ribis shall be employed as the President and Chief Executive Officer of THCR and Chief Executive Officer of THCR Holdings and shall receive a base salary of $907,500 annually. F-16
424B1159th Page of 203TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 159th
TRUMP HOTELS & CASINO RESORTS, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED) DECEMBER 31, 1995 RESTRICTED CASH As a condition to the June 1995 Note Offering, THCR Holdings and THCR Funding entered into a Cash Collateral and Disbursement Agreement (the "Cash Collateral Agreement") with First Bank National Association in its respective capacities as Trustee and Disbursement Agent (each as defined therein). The Cash Collateral Agreement called for initial deposits to custodial accounts which are restricted in use for (a) Trump Indiana for the ship and land projects, (b) Trump Plaza construction projects, including the exercise of the option (the "Trump World's Fair Purchase Option") to purchase the former Trump Regency Hotel ("Trump World's Fair") and construction projects at Trump Plaza East and Trump World's Fair, and (c) the first two interest payments on the Senior Notes. As of December 31, 1995, $12,013,000 is restricted for the 1996 interest payment on the Senior Notes and is reflected as Restricted Cash in the accompanying balance sheet. The balance of funds restricted for Trump Indiana, Trump Plaza East and Trump World's Fair is approximately $40,030,000, at December 31, 1995, and is reflected as Restricted Cash for Future Construction in the accompanying balance sheet. TRUMP WORLD'S FAIR Under an Option Agreement with Chemical Bank ("Chemical"), Trump had an option to purchase (i) Trump World's Fair (including the land, improvements and personal property used in the operation of the hotel) and (ii) certain promissory notes made by Trump and/or certain of his affiliates and payable to Chemical (the "Chemical Notes") which are secured by certain real estate assets located in New York, unrelated to Plaza Associates. In connection with such Option Agreement, Trump assigned his rights to Plaza Associates. On June 12, 1995, the Trump World's Fair Purchase Option was exercised. The option price of $60,000,000 was funded with $58,150,000 from the capital contributed by THCR Holdings (See Note 1), and $1,850,000 of option payments made by Plaza Associates. (9) NOTE RECEIVABLE Prior to consummation of the June 1995 Offerings, Trump incurred $3,000,000 relating to expenditures for the development of Trump Indiana and other gaming ventures. Concurrently with the June 1995 Offerings, THCR Holdings loaned Trump $3,000,000 and Trump issued to THCR Holdings a five-year promissory note (the "Trump Note") bearing interest at a fixed rate of 10% per annum, payable annually. The Trump Note will be automatically canceled in the event that at any time during the period defined in the Trump Note, the THCR Common Stock trades at a price per share equal to or greater than the prices set forth in the Trump Note (subject to adjustment in certain circumstances). During the period from inception to December 31, 1995, the trading price of the THCR Common Stock did not reach the defined prices. (10) INVESTMENT IN BUFFINGTON HARBOR Trump Indiana and The Majestic Star Casino, LLC ("Barden") entered into an agreement (the "BHR Agreement") relating to the joint ownership, development and operation of all common land-based and waterside operations in support of each of their separate riverboat casinos at Buffington Harbor. Each will be equally responsible for the development and operating expenses at Buffington Harbor and THCR will be dependent on the ability of Barden to pay for its share of all future expenses. There can be no assurance that THCR or Trump Indiana will be able to fund from operations or to finance on terms satisfactory to THCR or Trump Indiana any such required expenditures, or, if available, whether such other indebtedness would be permitted under existing debt instruments of THCR. Furthermore, there can be no assurance that Barden will be able to fund its portion of such expenses. F-17
424B1160th Page of 203TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 160th
TRUMP HOTELS & CASINO RESORTS, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED) DECEMBER 31, 1995 (11) FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS The carrying amount of the following financial instruments approximates fair value, as follows: (a) cash and cash equivalents, accrued interest receivables and payables are based on the short-term nature of these financial instruments; and (b) CRDA bonds and deposits are based on the allowances to give effect to the below market interest rates. The estimated fair values of other financial instruments are as follows: [Download Table] DECEMBER 31, 1995 ------------------------- CARRYING AMOUNT FAIR VALUE ------------ ------------ 10 7/8% Mortgage Notes........................... $326,652,000 $341,550,000 15 1/2% Senior Secured Notes..................... 155,000,000 165,773,000 The fair value of the Plaza Notes and the Senior Notes is based on quoted market prices obtained by THCR from its investment advisor. There are no quoted market prices for other notes payable and a reasonable estimate could not be made without incurring excessive costs. (12) SUBSEQUENT EVENT On January 8, 1996, THCR, Taj Mahal Holding Corp. ("Taj Holding") and THCR Merger Corp. ("Merger Sub") entered into the Agreement and Plan of Merger, as amended by Amendment to Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of January 31, 1996 (the "Merger Agreement"), pursuant to which Merger Sub will merge with and into Taj Holding (the "Merger"). The Merger Agreement provides that each outstanding share of Class A Common Stock of Taj Holding (the "Taj Holding Class A Common Stock") (other than Dissenting Shares (as defined in the Proxy Statement-Prospectus)) will be converted into the right to receive, at each holder's election, either (a) $30.00 in cash or (b) that number of shares of THCR Common Stock as shall have a market value equal to $30.00. No fractional shares of THCR Common Stock will be issued in the Merger. The Merger Agreement also contemplates the following transactions occurring in connection with the Merger (the "Merger Transaction"): (a) the consummation of the offering by THCR of 12,500,000 shares of THCR Common Stock (and an amount to be issued pursuant to the underwriters' over- allotment option) (the "THCR Stock Offering") and the consummation of the offering by Trump AC and its wholly owned finance subsidiary Trump Atlantic City Funding, Inc. of $1,200,000,000 aggregate principal amount of first mortgage notes, the aggregate proceeds of which will be used, together with available cash, to (i) pay cash to those holders of Taj Holding Class A Common Stock electing to receive cash in the Merger, (ii) redeem the outstanding 11.35% Mortgage Bonds, Series A due 1999 (the "Taj Bonds") of Trump Taj Mahal Funding, Inc. ("Taj Funding"), (iii) redeem the outstanding shares of Class B Common Stock of Taj Holding as required in connection with the redemption of the Taj Bonds, (iv) retire the outstanding Plaza Notes, (v) satisfy the indebtedness of Trump Taj Mahal Associates ("Taj Associates"), the owner and operator of the Taj Mahal, under its loan agreement with National Westminster Bank USA, (vi) purchase certain real property used in the operation of the Taj Mahal that is currently leased from a corporation wholly owned by Trump, (vii) purchase certain real property used in the operation of Trump Plaza that is currently leased from an unaffiliated third party, (viii) make a payment to Bankers Trust Company ("Bankers Trust") to obtain releases of liens and guarantees that Bankers Trust has in connection with certain outstanding indebtedness owed by Trump to Bankers Trust, and (ix) pay related fees and expenses and provide working capital; F-18
424B1161st Page of 203TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 161st
TRUMP HOTELS & CASINO RESORTS, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED) DECEMBER 31, 1995 (b) the contribution by Trump to Trump AC (on behalf, and at the direction, of THCR Holdings) of all of his direct and indirect ownership interests in Taj Associates; and (c) the contribution by THCR to Trump AC (on behalf, and at the direction, of THCR Holdings) of all of its indirect ownership interests in Taj Associates acquired in the Merger. To the extent that holders of Taj Holding Class A Common Stock elect to receive shares of THCR Common Stock in the Merger, THCR may reduce the size of the THCR Stock Offering. In addition to the shares of THCR Common Stock that may be issued in the THCR Stock Offering, THCR may issue, as part of the THCR Stock Offering, up to an additional 20% of such number of shares, to fund working capital and other general corporate purposes. The prospective transaction is subject to a number of conditions, including stockholder approval. In addition, there are a number of risks that should be considered, including: (i) the high leverage and fixed charges of THCR; (ii) the risk in refinancing and repaying indebtedness, and the need for additional financing;(iii) THCR's holding company structure and the likelihood that dividends will not be paid for the forseeable future; (iv) the restrictions imposed on certain activities by certain debt instruments; (v) the historical results of Trump Plaza and the Taj Mahal; and (vi) risks associated with the Indiana Riverboat and the expansions at Trump Plaza and the Taj Mahal. There can be no assurance that the expansions at Trump Plaza or the Taj Mahal will be completed or that the Indiana Riverboat or any other gaming venture will open or that any of THCR's or the Taj Mahal's operations will be successful. See "Risk Factors" included elsewhere in this Prospectus for a discussion of these and other factors. F-19
424B1162nd Page of 203TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 162nd
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS To Trump Atlantic City Associates and Trump Plaza Associates: We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Trump Atlantic City Associates (a New Jersey general partnership) and Trump Plaza Associates (a New Jersey general partnership) as of December 31, 1994 and June 12, 1995, and the related consolidated statements of operations, capital (deficit) and cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 1994 and for the period from January 1, 1995 through June 12, 1995. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the management of Trump Atlantic City Associates and Trump Plaza Associates. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Trump Atlantic City Associates and Trump Plaza Associates as of December 31, 1994 and June 12, 1995, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 1994 and for the period from January 1, 1995 through June 12, 1995, in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. Arthur Andersen LLP Roseland, New Jersey February 21, 1996 F-20
424B1163rd Page of 203TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 163rd
TRUMP ATLANTIC CITY ASSOCIATES AND TRUMP PLAZA ASSOCIATES CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS DECEMBER 31, 1994 AND JUNE 12, 1995 [Download Table] DECEMBER 31, JUNE 12, 1994 1995 ASSETS ------------- ------------- Current Assets: Cash and cash equivalents...................... $ 11,144,000 $ 28,125,000 Trade receivables, net of allowances for doubtful accounts of $8,493,000 and $8,490,000, respectively...................... 6,685,000 7,295,000 Accounts receivable, other..................... 112,000 -- Inventories.................................... 2,477,000 3,424,000 Prepaid expenses and other current assets...... 4,280,000 4,419,000 Due from affiliates, net....................... -- 89,000 ------------- ------------- Total current assets......................... 24,698,000 43,352,000 ------------- ------------- Property and Equipment (Notes 4, 6 and 8): Land and land improvements..................... 36,463,000 36,462,000 Buildings and building improvements............ 297,573,000 299,483,000 Furniture, fixtures and equipment.............. 84,709,000 84,989,000 Leasehold improvements......................... 2,404,000 2,404,000 Construction in progress....................... 14,864,000 21,263,000 ------------- ------------- 436,013,000 444,601,000 Less--Accumulated depreciation and amortiza- tion.......................................... (137,659,000) (143,285,000) ------------- ------------- Net property and equipment................... 298,354,000 301,316,000 ------------- ------------- Land Rights, net of accumulated amortization of $3,780,000 and $3,945,000, respectively......... 29,688,000 29,524,000 ------------- ------------- Other Assets: Deferred bond issuance costs, net of accumulated amortization of $3,270,000 and $5,827,000, respectively (Note 3)............. 14,125,000 12,105,000 Other Assets................................... 8,778,000 7,788,000 ------------- ------------- Total other assets........................... 22,903,000 19,893,000 ------------- ------------- Total assets................................. $ 375,643,000 $ 394,085,000 ============= ============= LIABILITIES AND CAPITAL Current Liabilities: Current maturities of long-term debt (Note 3).. $ 2,969,000 $ 87,797,000 Accounts payable............................... 9,156,000 9,303,000 Accrued payroll................................ 4,026,000 3,998,000 Self insurance reserves (Note 6)............... 4,039,000 4,041,000 Accrued interest payable (Note 3).............. 1,871,000 22,032,000 Other accrued expenses......................... 7,693,000 5,253,000 Other current liabilities...................... 1,868,000 1,112,000 Due to affiliates, net (Note 8)................ 206,000 -- ------------- ------------- Total current liabilities.................... 31,828,000 133,536,000 ------------- ------------- Non-Current Liabilities: Long-term debt, net of discount and current ma- turities (Note 3)............................. 403,214,000 331,142,000 Distribution payable to Trump Plaza Funding, Inc........................................... 3,822,000 3,822,000 Deferred state income taxes.................... 359,000 198,000 ------------- ------------- Total non-current liabilities................ 407,395,000 335,162,000 ------------- ------------- Total liabilities............................ 439,223,000 468,698,000 ------------- ------------- Commitments and Contingencies (Notes 4 and 6).... -- -- Capital (Deficit): Partners' Deficit.............................. (78,772,000) (78,772,000) Retained Earnings.............................. 15,192,000 4,159,000 ------------- ------------- Total Capital (Deficit)...................... (63,580,000) (74,613,000) ------------- ------------- Total liabilities and capital................ $ 375,643,000 $ 394,085,000 ============= ============= The accompanying notes to financial statements are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements. F-21
424B1164th Page of 203TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 164th
TRUMP ATLANTIC CITY ASSOCIATES AND TRUMP PLAZA ASSOCIATES CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1993 AND 1994 AND FOR THE PERIOD FROM JANUARY 1, 1995 THROUGH JUNE 12, 1995 [Download Table] FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, FOR THE PERIOD -------------------------- FROM JANUARY 1, 1995 1993 1994 THROUGH JUNE 12, 1995 ------------ ------------ --------------------- Revenues: Gaming..................... $264,081,000 $261,451,000 $122,865,000 Rooms...................... 18,324,000 18,312,000 7,676,000 Food and Beverage.......... 41,941,000 40,149,000 18,537,000 Other...................... 8,938,000 8,408,000 3,310,000 ------------ ------------ ------------ Gross Revenues........... 333,284,000 328,320,000 152,388,000 Less--Promotional allowances................ 32,793,000 33,257,000 14,540,000 ------------ ------------ ------------ Net Revenues............. 300,491,000 295,063,000 137,848,000 ------------ ------------ ------------ Costs and expenses: Gaming..................... 136,895,000 139,540,000 69,467,000 Rooms...................... 2,831,000 2,715,000 958,000 Food and Beverage.......... 18,093,000 17,050,000 7,128,000 General and Administrative. 71,624,000 73,075,000 30,081,000 Depreciation and Amortization.............. 17,554,000 15,653,000 6,999,000 Other...................... 3,854,000 3,615,000 1,397,000 ------------ ------------ ------------ 250,851,000 251,648,000 116,030,000 ------------ ------------ ------------ Income from operations... 49,640,000 43,415,000 21,818,000 ------------ ------------ ------------ Non-operating income (expense): Interest income............ 546,000 842,000 403,000 Interest expense (Note 3).. (40,435,000) (49,061,000) (22,516,000) Other non-operating expense (Note 5).................. (3,873,000) (4,931,000) (1,649,000) ------------ ------------ ------------ Non-operating expense, net..................... (43,762,000) (53,150,000) (23,762,000) ------------ ------------ ------------ Income (loss) before state income taxes and extraordinary items..... 5,878,000 (9,735,000) (1,944,000) Provision (benefit) for state income taxes................ 660,000 (865,000) (161,000) ------------ ------------ ------------ Income (loss) before extraordinary items......... 5,218,000 (8,870,000) (1,783,000) Extraordinary gain (loss) (Note 5).................... 4,120,000 -- (9,250,000) ------------ ------------ ------------ Net income (loss)............ $ 9,338,000 $ (8,870,000) $(11,033,000) ============ ============ ============ The accompanying notes to financial statements are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements. F-22
424B1165th Page of 203TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 165th
TRUMP ATLANTIC CITY ASSOCIATES AND TRUMP PLAZA ASSOCIATES CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CAPITAL (DEFICIT) FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1993 AND 1994 AND FOR THE PERIOD FROM JANUARY 1, 1995 THROUGH JUNE 12, 1995 [Download Table] PARTNERS' RETAINED CAPITAL EARNINGS TOTAL ------------ ------------ ------------ Balance, December 31, 1992.......... $ (3,362,000) $ 14,724,000 $ 11,362,000 Net Income.......................... -- 9,338,000 9,338,000 Preferred Trump Plaza Associates In- terest Distribution................ (6,317,000) -- (6,317,000) Distribution to Donald J. Trump to repay certain personal indebtedness....................... (52,500,000) -- (52,500,000) Distribution to Donald J. Trump to redeem Trump Plaza Funding, Inc. Preferred Stock Units.............. (35,000,000) -- (35,000,000) Conversion of Preferred Trump Plaza Associates Interest into General Trump Plaza Associates Interest.... 18,407,000 -- 18,407,000 ------------ ------------ ------------ Balance, December 31, 1993.......... (78,772,000) 24,062,000 (54,710,000) Net Loss............................ -- (8,870,000) (8,870,000) ------------ ------------ ------------ Balance, December 31, 1994.......... $(78,772,000) $ 15,192,000 $(63,580,000) Net Loss............................ -- (11,033,000) (11,033,000) ------------ ------------ ------------ Balance, June 12, 1995.............. $(78,772,000) $ 4,159,000 $(74,613,000) ============ ============ ============ The accompanying notes to financial statements are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements. F-23
424B1166th Page of 203TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 166th
TRUMP ATLANTIC CITY ASSOCIATES AND TRUMP PLAZA ASSOCIATES CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1993 AND 1994 AND FOR THE PERIOD FROM JANUARY 1, 1995 THROUGH JUNE 12, 1995 [Download Table] FOR THE PERIOD FOR THE YEARS ENDED FROM DECEMBER 31, JANUARY 1, 1995 --------------------------- THROUGH 1993 1994 JUNE 12, 1995 ------------- ------------ --------------- Cash flows from operating activities: Net Income (loss).................. $ 9,338,000 $ (8,870,000) $(11,033,000) Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash flows provided by operating activities: Noncash charges: Extraordinary loss (gain)....... (4,120,000) -- 9,250,000 Depreciation and amortization... 17,544,000 15,653,000 6,999,000 Accretion of discount on indebtedness................... 862,000 1,916,000 894,000 Provision for losses on receivables.................... 90,000 396,000 498,000 Deferred state income taxes..... 729,000 (865,000) (161,000) Utilization of CRDA credits and donations...................... -- 1,062,000 127,000 Valuation allowance of CRDA investments.................... 1,047,000 394,000 67,000 ------------- ------------ ------------ 25,500,000 9,686,000 6,641,000 Decrease (increase) in receivables.................... 823,000 (236,000) (996,000) Decrease (increase) in inventories.................... (498,000) (91,000) 233,000 Increase in prepaid expenses and other current assets........... (199,000) (1,385,000) (139,000) (Increase) decrease in other assets......................... 2,530,000 1,504,000 (744,000) Increase (decrease) in amounts due to (from) affiliates....... 188,000 109,000 (295,000) Increase (decrease) in accounts payable, accrued expenses and other current liabilities...... (6,524,000) 10,464,000 18,058,000 Decrease in distribution payable to Trump Plaza Funding, Inc.... -- (101,000) -- ------------- ------------ ------------ Net cash flows provided by operating activities........... $ 21,820,000 $ 19,950,000 $ 22,758,000 ------------- ------------ ------------ Cash flows from investing activities: Purchases of property and equipment....................... $ (10,052,000) $(20,489,000) (7,364,000) Purchases of CRDA investments.... (2,823,000) (2,525,000) -- Cash refund of CRDA deposits..... 196,000 1,323,000 -- Investment in TPA/THCR........... -- -- -- ------------- ------------ ------------ Net cash flows used in investing activities...................... (12,679,000) (21,691,000) (7,364,000) ------------- ------------ ------------ Cash flows from financing activities: Deferred financing costs......... (17,342,000) -- -- Distributions to Donald J. Trump. (87,500,000) -- -- Distributions to Trump Plaza Funding, Inc. .................. (40,000,000) -- -- Preferred Trump Plaza Associates Interest Distribution........... (6,282,000) -- -- Borrowings....................... 386,147,000 375,000 1,928,000 Payments and current maturities of long-term debt............... (248,573,000) (1,883,000) (341,000) ------------- ------------ ------------ Net cash flows used in financing activities...................... (13,550,000) (1,508,000) 1,587,000 ------------- ------------ ------------ Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents.......... (4,409,000) (3,249,000) 16,981,000 Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year................. 18,802,000 14,393,000 11,144,000 ------------- ------------ ------------ Cash and cash equivalents at end of year.............................. $ 14,393,000 $ 11,144,000 $ 28,125,000 ============= ============ ============ The accompanying notes to financial statements are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements. F-24
424B1167th Page of 203TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 167th
TRUMP ATLANTIC CITY ASSOCIATES AND TRUMP PLAZA ASSOCIATES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (1) ORGANIZATION The accompanying financial statements include those of Trump Atlantic City Associates ("Trump AC"), a New Jersey general partnership (formerly Trump Plaza Holding Associates), and its 99% owned subsidiary, Trump Plaza Associates ("Plaza Associates"), a New Jersey general partnership, which owns and operates Trump Plaza Hotel and Casino ("Trump Plaza") located in Atlantic City, New Jersey. Trump Plaza Funding, Inc. ("Plaza Funding"), a New Jersey corporation, owns the remaining 1% interest in Plaza Associates. Trump AC's sole source of liquidity is distributions in respect of its interest in Plaza Associates. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in the accompanying consolidated financial statements. The minority interest in Plaza Associates has not been separately reflected in the consolidated financial statements of Trump AC since it is not material. Plaza Funding was incorporated on March 14, 1986 and was originally formed solely to raise funds through the issuance and sale of its debt securities for the benefit of Plaza Associates. As part of a Prepackaged Plan of Reorganization under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code consummated on May 29, 1992, Plaza Funding became a partner of Plaza Associates and issued approximately three million stock units, each comprised of one share of Preferred Stock and one share of Common Stock of Plaza Funding. On June 25, 1993, the stock units were redeemed with a portion of the proceeds of Plaza Funding's 10 7/8% First Mortgage Notes due 2001 (the "Plaza Notes") as well as Trump AC's stock units. Trump AC was formed in February, 1993 for the purpose of raising funds for Plaza Associates. On June 25, 1993, Trump AC completed the sale of 12,000 Units (the "Units"), each Unit consisting of $5,000 principal amount of 12 1/2% Pay- In-Kind Notes, due 2003 (the "PIK Notes"), and one PIK Note Warrant (the "PIK Note Warrants") to acquire $1,000 principal amount of PIK Notes. The PIK Notes and the PIK Note Warrants are separately transferable. Trump AC has no other assets or business other than its 99% equity interest in Plaza Associates. Plaza Associates was organized in June 1982. Prior to the date of the consummation of the Offerings (as defined), Plaza Associates' three partners were TP/GP Inc. ("Trump Plaza/GP"), the managing general partner of Plaza Associates, Plaza Funding and Donald J. Trump ("Trump"). On June 25, 1993, Trump contributed his interest in Trump Plaza/GP to Plaza Funding and Trump Plaza/GP merged with and into Plaza Funding. Plaza Funding then became the managing general partner of Plaza Associates. In addition, Trump contributed his interest in Plaza Associates to Trump AC, and Plaza Funding and Trump AC, each of which are wholly owned by Trump, became the sole partners of Plaza Associates. On June 12, 1995, Trump Hotels & Casino Resorts, Inc. ("THCR"), completed a public offering of 10,000,000 shares of common stock at $14.00 per share (the "Stock Offering") for gross proceeds of $140,000,000. Concurrently with the Stock Offering, Trump Hotels & Casino Resorts Holdings, L.P. ("THCR Holdings"), a 60% subsidiary of THCR, together with its subsidiary, Trump Hotels & Casino Resorts Funding, Inc. ("THCR Funding"), issued 15 1/2% Senior Secured Notes (the "Senior Secured Notes") for gross proceeds of $155,000,000 (the "Note Offering" and, together with the Stock Offerings, the "1995 Offerings"). From the proceeds from the Stock Offering, THCR contributed $126,848,000 to THCR Holdings. THCR Holdings subsequently contributed $172,859,000 to Trump AC. Prior to the 1995 Offerings, Trump was the sole stockholder of THCR and sole beneficial owner of THCR Holdings. Concurrent with the 1995 Offerings, Trump contributed to THCR Holdings all of his beneficial interest in Plaza Associates (consisting of all of the outstanding capital stock of Plaza Funding, a 99% equity interest in Trump AC and all of the outstanding capital stock of Trump Plaza Holding Inc. which owns the remaining 1% equity interest in Trump AC). Trump also contributed to THCR Holdings all of his F-25
424B1168th Page of 203TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 168th
TRUMP ATLANTIC CITY ASSOCIATES AND TRUMP PLAZA ASSOCIATES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED) existing interest and rights to new gaming activities in both emerging and established gaming jurisdictions, including Trump Indiana but excluding his interests in the Trump Taj Mahal Casino Resort (the "Taj Mahal") and Trump's Castle Casino Resort. (2) SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES ORGANIZATION AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION Plaza Associates operates a luxury casino hotel, Trump Plaza Hotel and Casino ("Trump Plaza"), located on The Boardwalk in Atlantic City, which provides high quality amenities and services to its casino patrons and hotel guests. A substantial portion of Trump Plaza's revenues are derived from its gaming operations and in the past Trump Plaza has targeted the higher-end drive-in slot customer. Competition in the Atlantic City casino total market is intense and management believes that this competition will continue as more casinos are opened and new entrants into the gaming industry become operational. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. REVENUE RECOGNITION Gaming revenues represent the net win from gaming activities which is the difference between amounts wagered and amounts won by patrons. Revenues from hotel and other services are recognized at the time the related service is performed. Plaza Associates provides an allowance for doubtful accounts arising from casino, hotel and other services, which is based upon a specific review of certain outstanding receivables as well as historical collection information. In determining the amount of the allowance, management is required to make certain estimates and assumptions regarding the timing and amount of collection. Actual results could differ from those estimates and assumptions. PROMOTIONAL ALLOWANCES The retail value of accommodations, food, beverage and other services provided to customers without charge is included in gross revenue and deducted as promotional allowances. The estimated departmental costs of providing such promotional allowances are included in gaming costs and expenses as follows: [Download Table] YEAR ENDED FOR THE PERIOD FROM DECEMBER 31, JANUARY 1, 1995 --------------- THROUGH 1993 1994 JUNE 12, 1995 ------- ------- ------------------- (IN THOUSANDS) Rooms............................. $ 4,190 $ 4,311 $ 1,761 Food and Beverage................. 14,726 15,373 6,866 Other............................. 3,688 4,169 1,502 ------- ------- ------- $22,604 $23,853 $10,129 ======= ======= ======= During 1994, certain Progressive Slot Jackpot Programs were discontinued which resulted in $585,000, of related accruals being taken into income. F-26
424B1169th Page of 203TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 169th
TRUMP ATLANTIC CITY ASSOCIATES AND TRUMP PLAZA ASSOCIATES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED) INVENTORIES Inventories of provisions and supplies are carried at the lower of cost (weighted average) or market. PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT Property and equipment is carried at cost and is depreciated on the straight- line method using rates based on the following estimated useful lives: [Download Table] Buildings and building improvements........................... 40 years Furniture, fixtures and equipment............................. 3-10 years Leasehold improvements........................................ 10-40 years Interest associated with borrowings used to finance construction projects has been capitalized and is being amortized over the estimated useful lives of the assets. LAND RIGHTS Land rights represent the fair value of such rights at the time of contribution to Plaza Associates by the Trump Plaza Corporation, an affiliate of Plaza Associates. These rights are being amortized over the period of the underlying operating leases which extend through 2078. LONG LIVED ASSETS During 1995, Plaza Associates adopted the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 121 "Accounting for the Impairment of Long- Lived Assets" ("SFAS"). SFAS No. 121 requires, among other things, that an entity review its long-lived assets and certain related intangibles for impairment whenever changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be fully recoverable. Impairment of long-lived assets exists, if, at a minimum the future expected cash flows (undiscounted and without interest charges from an entity's operations are less than the carrying value of these assets. As a result of its review, Plaza Associates does not believe that any impairment exists in the recoverability of its long-lived assets. INCOME TAXES Plaza Funding, Trump AC's and Plaza Associates' adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 109, "Accounting for Income Taxes" ("SFAS No. 109"), effective January 1, 1993. Adoption of this new standard did not have a significant impact on the respective statements of financial condition or results of operations. SFAS No. 109 requires recognition of deferred tax liabilities and assets for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been included in the financial statements or tax returns. Under this method deferred tax liabilities and assets are determined based on the difference between the financial statement and the tax basis of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse. The accompanying consolidated financial statements of Trump AC and Plaza Associates do not include a provision for federal income taxes since any income or losses allocated to its partners are reportable for federal income tax purposes by the partners. Under the New Jersey Casino Control Act (the "Casino Control Act"), Plaza Associates is required to file a New Jersey corporation business tax return. As of June 12, 1995, Trump AC and Plaza Associates had state tax net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $32,800,000 which are available to offset future state taxable income. Such carryforwards expire from 1997 to 2001. The net operating loss carryforwards result in a deferred tax asset of $2,900,000 which has been offset by a valuation allowance of $2,900,000 as utilization of such carryforwards is not considered to be more likely than not. Plaza Associates' deferred state income taxes result primarily from differences in the timing of reporting depreciation for tax and financial statement purposes. F-27
424B1170th Page of 203TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 170th
TRUMP ATLANTIC CITY ASSOCIATES AND TRUMP PLAZA ASSOCIATES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED) STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS For purposes of the statements of cash flows, Plaza Funding, Trump AC and Plaza Associates consider all highly liquid debt instruments purchased with a maturity of three months or less at time of acquisition to be cash equivalents. The following supplemental disclosures are made to the statements of cash flows. [Download Table] FOR THE PERIOD FROM FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, JANUARY 1, 1995 --------------------------------- THROUGH 1993 1994 JUNE 12, 1995 ---------------- ---------------- ------------------- Cash paid during the year for interest............ $ 41,118,000 $ 36,538,000 $265,000 ================ ================ ======== Cash paid for state and Federal income taxes.... $ 81,000 $ -- $ -- ================ ================ ======== Issuance of debt in ex- change for accrued in- terest.................. $ 3,562,000 $ 8,194,000 $ -- ================ ================ ======== RECLASSIFICATIONS Certain reclassifications have been made to prior year financial statements to conform to the current year presentation. (3) LONG-TERM DEBT Long-term debt consists of the following: [Download Table] DECEMBER 31, 1994 JUNE 12, 1995 ----------------- ------------- Plaza Associates Note (10 7/8% Mortgage Notes, due 2001 net of unamortized discount of $3,766,000 and $3,597,000, respectively) (A)........................... $326,234,000 $326,403,000 Mortgage notes payable (C)................... 5,494,000 5,289,000 Other notes payable.......................... 468,000 3,501,000 PIK Notes (12 1/2% Notes, due 2003 net of discount of $9,769,000 at December 31, 1994) (B)......................................... 73,987,000 83,746,000 ------------ ------------ 406,183,000 418,939,000 Less--Current maturities..................... 2,969,000 87,797,000 ------------ ------------ $403,214,000 $331,142,000 ============ ============ --------------------- (A) On June 25, 1993 Plaza Funding issued $330,000,000 principal amount of 10 7/8% Mortgage Notes, due 2001 (the "Plaza Notes"), net of discount of $4,313,000. Net proceeds of the offering were used to redeem all of Plaza Funding's outstanding $225,000,000 principal amount 12% Mortgage Bonds, due 2002 and together with other funds (See (B) Pay-In-Kind Notes) to redeem all of Plaza Funding's Stock Units, comprised of $75,000,000 liquidation preference participating cumulative redeemable Preferred Stock with associated shares of Common Stock, to repay $17,500,000 principal amount 9.14% Regency Note due 2003, to make a portion of a distribution to Trump to pay certain personal indebtedness, and to pay transaction expenses. The Plaza Notes mature on June 15, 2001 and are redeemable at any time on or after June 15, 1998, at the option of Plaza Funding or Plaza Associates, in whole or in part, at the principal amount plus a premium which declines ratably each year to zero in the year of maturity. The Plaza Notes bear interest at the stated rate of 10 7/8% per annum from the date of issuance, payable semi-annually on each June 15 and December 15, commencing December 15, 1993 and are secured by substantially all of Plaza Associates assets. The accompanying consolidated financial statements reflect interest expense at the effective interest rate of 11.12% per annum. F-28
424B1171st Page of 203TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 171st
TRUMP ATLANTIC CITY ASSOCIATES AND TRUMP PLAZA ASSOCIATES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED) The Indenture governing the Plaza Notes (the "Plaza Note Indenture") contains certain covenants limiting the ability of Plaza Associates to incur indebtedness, including indebtedness secured by liens on Trump Plaza. In addition, Plaza Associates may, under certain circumstances, incur up to $25,000,000 of indebtedness to finance the expansion of its facilities, which indebtedness may be secured by a lien on the hotel facilities of Plaza Associates ("Trump Plaza East") (See Note 6) senior to the liens of one of the Plaza Mortgages (the "Plaza Note Mortgage") and another of the Plaza Mortgages (the "Plaza Guarantee Mortgage") thereon. The Plaza Notes represent the senior indebtedness of Plaza Funding. The note from Plaza Associates to Plaza Funding in the same principal amount of the Plaza Notes (the "Plaza Associates Note") and the guarantee of the Plaza Notes (the "Plaza Guarantee") rank pari passu in right of payment with all existing and future senior indebtedness of Plaza Associates. The Plaza Notes, the Plaza Associates Note, the Plaza Note Mortgage, the Plaza Guarantee and the Plaza Guarantee Mortgage are non-recourse to the partners of Plaza Associates, to the shareholders of Plaza Funding and to all other persons and entities (other than Plaza Funding and Plaza Associates), including Trump. Upon an event of default, holders of the Plaza Notes would have recourse only to the assets of Plaza Funding and Plaza Associates. (B) On June 25, 1993, Trump AC issued $60,000,000 principal amount of PIK Notes, together with PIK Note Warrants to acquire an additional $12,000,000 of PIK Notes at no additional cost. The PIK Note Warrants were exercised prior to June 12, 1995. The PIK Notes and PIK Note Warrants were subsequently redeemed with a portion of the proceeds contributed to Trump AC by THCR Holdings (See Note 1). Such redemption resulted in the recognition of an extraordinary loss of $9,250,000, including the write-off of related unamortized deferred financing costs. (C) Interest on these notes is payable with interest rates ranging from 10.0% to 11.0%. The notes are due at various dates between 1995 and 1998 and are secured by real property. The aggregate maturities of long-term debt for the period from June 12, 1995 through December 31, 1995 and in each of the years subsequent to 1995 are: [Download Table] For the period from June 12, 1995 through December 31, 1995................................................. $ 87,797,000 1996.................................................. 921,000 1997.................................................. 3,335,000 1998.................................................. 483,000 1999.................................................. -- Thereafter............................................ 330,000,000 ------------ $422,536,000(1) ============ --------------------- (1) Includes accretion to maturity of $3,597,000. The ability of Plaza Associates and Plaza Funding to repay their long- term debt when due will depend on their ability to either generate cash from operations sufficient for such purposes or to refinance such indebtedness. Management does not currently anticipate that cash flow will be sufficient and that repayment will likely depend upon the ability to refinance such indebtedness. The future operating performance and the ability to refinance such indebtedness will be subject to the then prevailing economic conditions, industry conditions and numerous other financial, business and other factors, many of which are beyond the control of Plaza Funding or Plaza Associates. There can be no assurance that the future operating performance of Plaza Associates will be sufficient to meet these repayment obligations or that the general state of the economy, the status of the capital markets generally or the receptiveness of the capital markets to the gaming industry will be conducive to refinancing or other attempts to raise capital. F-29
424B1172nd Page of 203TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 172nd
TRUMP ATLANTIC CITY ASSOCIATES AND TRUMP PLAZA ASSOCIATES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED) (4) LEASES Plaza Associates leases property (primarily land), certain parking space, and various equipment under operating leases. Rent expense for the years ended December 31, 1993, 1994 and for the period from January 1, 1995 through June 12, 1995 was $4,338,000, $3,613,000 and $1,466,000, respectively, of which $2,513,000, $1,900,000 and $850,000, respectively, relates to affiliates of Plaza Associates. Future minimum lease payments under the noncancelable operating leases are as follows: [Download Table] AMOUNTS RELATING TO TOTAL AFFILIATES ------------ ------------ For the period from June 12, 1995 through December 31, 1995............................ $ 2,143,000 $ 1,276,000 1996.......................................... 6,770,000 2,450,000 1997.......................................... 6,814,000 2,494,000 1998.......................................... 5,254,000 2,494,000 1999.......................................... 3,533,000 2,450,000 Thereafter.................................... 487,450,000 407,450,000 ------------ ------------ $511,964,000 $418,614,000 ============ ============ Certain of these leases contain options to purchase the leased properties at various prices throughout the leased terms. At December 31, 1994, the aggregate option price for these leases was approximately $58,000,000. In October 1993, Plaza Associates assumed the lease to Trump of Trump Plaza East (the "Trump Plaza East Lease") and related expenses which are included in the above lease commitment amounts. On June 25, 1993, Plaza Associates acquired a five-year option to purchase Trump Plaza East. See Note 6-- "Commitments and Contingencies Future Expansion." (5) EXTRAORDINARY GAIN (LOSS) AND NON-OPERATING EXPENSE The extraordinary loss of $9,250,000 for the period January 1, 1995 through June 12, 1995 related to the redemption of the PIK Notes and the PIK Note Warrants and the write-off of related deferred financing costs (See Note 10). The excess of the carrying value of a note obligation over the amount of the settlement payment net of related prepaid expenses in the amount of $4,120,000 has been reported as an extraordinary gain for the year ended December 31, 1993. Non-operating expense consists of costs associated with Trump Plaza East (See Note 6). In 1993, 1994 and the period January 1, 1995 through June 12, 1995 these costs were $3,873,000, $4,931,000 and $1,533,000, respectively, net of miscellaneous non-operating credits. (6) COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES CASINO LICENSE RENEWAL The operation of an Atlantic City hotel and casino is subject to significant regulatory controls which affect virtually all of its operations. Under the Casino Control Act, Plaza Associates is required to maintain certain licenses. In June 1995, the New Jersey Casino Control Commission ("CCC") renewed Plaza Associates license to operate Trump Plaza. This license must be renewed in June 1999, is not transferable and will require a F-30
424B1173rd Page of 203TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 173rd
TRUMP ATLANTIC CITY ASSOCIATES AND TRUMP PLAZA ASSOCIATES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED) determination of the financial stability of Plaza Associates. Upon revocation, suspension for more than 120 days, or failure to renew the casino license, the Casino Control Act provides for the mandatory appointment of a conservator to take possession of the hotel and casino's business and property, subject to all valid liens, claims and encumbrances. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS Plaza Associates, its Partners, certain members of its former Executive Committee, and certain of its employees, have been involved in various legal proceedings. In general, Plaza Associates has agreed to indemnify such persons against any and all losses, claims, damages, expenses (including reasonable costs, disbursements and counsel fees) and liabilities (including amounts paid or incurred in satisfaction of settlements, judgements, fines and penalties) incurred by them in said legal proceedings. Such persons and entities are vigorously defending the allegations against them and intend to vigorously contest any future proceedings. Various legal proceedings are now pending against Plaza Associates. Plaza Associates considers all such proceedings to be ordinary litigation incident to the character of its business. Plaza Associates believes that the resolution of these claims will not, individually or in the aggregate, have a material adverse effect on its financial condition or results of operations. Plaza Associates is also a party to various administrative proceedings involving allegations that it has violated certain provisions of the Casino Control Act. Plaza Associates believes that the final outcome of these proceedings will not, either individually or in the aggregate, have a material adverse effect on its financial condition, results of operations or on the ability of Plaza Associates to otherwise retain or renew any casino or other licenses required under the Casino Control Act for the operation of Trump Plaza. SELF INSURANCE RESERVES Self insurance reserves represent the estimated amounts of uninsured claims related to employee health medical costs, workmen's compensation and personal injury claims that have occurred in the usual course of business. These reserves are established by management based upon specific review of open claims, with consideration of incurred but not reported claims as of the balance sheet date. Actual results may differ from these reserve amounts. CASINO REINVESTMENT DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OBLIGATIONS Pursuant to the provisions of the Casino Control Act, Plaza Associates, commencing twelve months after the date of opening of Trump Plaza in May 1984, and continuing for a period of twenty-five years thereafter, must either obtain investment tax credits (as defined in the Casino Control Act), in an amount equivalent to 1.25% of its gross casino revenues, or pay an alternative tax of 2.5% of its gross casino revenues (as defined in the Casino Control Act). Investment tax credits may be obtained by making qualified investments or by the purchase of bonds at below market interest rates from the Casino Reinvestment Development Authority ("CRDA"). Plaza Associates is required to make quarterly deposits with the CRDA based on 1.25% of its gross revenue. For the years ended December 31, 1993 and 1994 and for the period from January 1, 1995 through June 12, 1995, Plaza Associates charged to operations $1,047,000, $838,000 and $471,000 respectively, to give effect to the below market interest rates associated with CRDA bonds that have either been issued or are expected to be issued from funds deposited. Additionally, for the period from January 1, 1995 through June 12, 1995, Plaza Associates credited operations for $501,000 resulting from recapture of the valuation allowance on the CRDA receivable. Bonds issued by the CRDA will be accounted for under SFAS No. 121, as such bonds are not marketable. F-31
424B1174th Page of 203TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 174th
TRUMP ATLANTIC CITY ASSOCIATES AND TRUMP PLAZA ASSOCIATES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED) In connection with Trump Plaza East (see below), the CRDA has approved the use of up to $1,519,000 in deposits made by Plaza Associates for site improvements. Such deposits are being capitalized as part of property and equipment as funds are appropriated by the CRDA. At June 12, 1995, Plaza Associates has recorded a receivable from the CRDA of $288,000, which is included in Accounts Receivable Other. CONCENTRATIONS OF CREDIT RISKS In accordance with casino industry practice, Plaza Associates extends credit to a limited number of casino patrons, after extensive background checks and investigations of credit worthiness. At December 31, 1994 approximately 28% of Plaza Associates casino receivables (before allowances) were from customers whose primary residence is outside the United States, with no significant concentration in any one foreign country. TRUMP PLAZA EAST In 1993, Plaza Associates received the approval of the CCC, subject to certain conditions, for the expansion of its hotel facilities at Trump Plaza East. On June 24, 1993, in connection with the 1993 refinancing of Trump Plaza, (i) Trump transferred title to Trump Plaza East to Missouri Boardwalk, Inc. ("Boardwalk"), a wholly owned subsidiary of Midlantic National Bank ("Midlantic"), in exchange for a reduction in indebtedness to Midlantic in an amount equal to the sum of the fair market value of Trump Plaza East and all rent payments made to Boardwalk by Trump under the Trump Plaza East Lease, (ii) Boardwalk leased Trump Plaza East to Trump under the Trump Plaza East Lease for a term of five years, which expires on June 30, 1998, during which time Trump was obligated to pay Boardwalk $260,000 per month in lease payments, and (iii) Plaza Associates acquired a five-year option to purchase Trump Plaza East (the "Trump Plaza East Purchase Option"). In October 1993, Plaza Associates assumed the Trump Plaza East Lease and related expenses. In addition, Plaza Associates has a right of first refusal (the "Right of First Offer") upon any proposed sale of all or any portion of the fee interest in Trump Plaza East during the term of the Trump Plaza East Purchase Option. Acquisition of Trump Plaza East by Plaza Associates would under certain circumstances (provided there are no events of default under the Trump Plaza East Lease or the Trump Plaza East Purchase Option and provided that certain other events had not theretofore or do not thereafter occur) discharge Trump's obligation to Midlantic in full. Until such time as the Trump Plaza East Purchase Option is exercised or expires, Plaza Associates will be obligated, from and after the date it entered into the Trump Plaza East Purchase Option, to pay the net expenses associated with Trump Plaza East. During 1995, THCR incurred approximately $2,340,000 of such expenses of which $2,045,000 are included in non-operating expenses in the accompanying consolidated financial statements. Under the Trump Plaza East Purchase Option, Plaza Associates has the right to acquire Trump Plaza East for a purchase price of $28,000,000 through 1996, increasing by $1,000,000 annually thereafter until expiration on June 30, 1998. The CCC has required that Plaza Associates exercise the Trump Plaza East Purchase Option or its right of first refusal no later than July 1, 1996. If Plaza Associates defaults in making payments due under the Trump Plaza East Purchase Option, Plaza Associates would be liable to the lender for the sum of (a) the present value of all remaining payments to be made by Plaza Associates pursuant to the Trump Plaza East Purchase Option during the term thereof and (b) the cost of demolition of all improvements then located on Trump Plaza East. Plaza Associates has commenced construction at Trump Plaza East pursuant to rights granted to Plaza Associates by its lessor. Plaza Associates has received approximately $1,519,000 in CRDA credit as of December 31, 1995. As of December 31, 1995, Plaza Associates had capitalized approximately $35,700,000 F-32
424B1175th Page of 203TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 175th
TRUMP ATLANTIC CITY ASSOCIATES AND TRUMP PLAZA ASSOCIATES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED) in construction costs related to Trump Plaza East including a $1,000,000 consulting fee paid to Trump (See Note 8). Plaza Associates' ability to acquire Trump Plaza East pursuant to the Trump Plaza East Purchase Option is dependent upon its ability to obtain financing to acquire the property. The ability to incur such indebtedness is restricted by the Plaza Note Indenture. Plaza Associates' ability to purchase Trump Plaza East is dependent upon its ability to use existing cash on hand and generate cash flow from operations sufficient to fund development costs. No assurance can be given that such cash on hand will be available to Plaza Associates for such purposes or that it will be able to generate sufficient cash flow from operations. In connection with the Merger Transaction (as defined) (See Note 12), Plaza Associates expects to exercise the Trump Plaza East Purchase Option. The accompanying consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that may be necessary should Plaza Associates be unable to exercise the Trump Plaza East Purchase Option. (7) EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS Plaza Associates has a retirement savings plan (the "Plan") for its nonunion employees under Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code. Employees are eligible to contribute up to 15% of their earnings to the Plan and Plaza Associates will match 50% of an eligible employee's contributions up to a maximum of 4% of the employee's earnings. Plaza Associates recorded charges of $765,000, $848,000 and $476,000 for matching contributions for the years ended December 31, 1993 and 1994 and for the period from January 1, 1995 through June 12, 1995, respectively. Plaza Associates provides no other material post-retirement or post- employment benefits. (8) TRANSACTIONS WITH AFFILIATES DUE TO/FROM AFFILIATES Plaza Associates leases warehouse facility space to Trump's Castle Associates. Lease payments of $15,000, $6,000 and $6,000 were received from Trump's Castle Associates in 1993, 1994 and 1995 respectively. Plaza Associates leased office space from Trump Taj Mahal Associates ("Taj Associates"), the owner and operator of the Trump Taj Mahal Casino Resort (the "Taj Mahal"), which terminated on March 19, 1993. Lease payments of $30,000 were paid to Taj Associates in 1993. Plaza Associates leases two parcels of land under long-term ground leases from Seashore Four Associates and Trump Seashore Associates. In 1993, 1994 and for the period from January 1, 1995 through June 12, 1995, Plaza Associates paid $900,000, $900,000 and $227,000, respectively, to Seashore Four Associates, and paid $1,000,000, $1,000,000 and $622,000 in 1993, 1994 and for the period from January 1, 1995 through June 12, 1995, respectively, to Trump Seashore Associates. SERVICES AGREEMENT Pursuant to the terms of a services agreement with Trump Plaza Management Corp. ("TPM"), a corporation beneficially owned by Trump, in consideration for services provided, Plaza Associates pays TPM each year an annual fee of $1,000,000 in equal monthly installments, and reimburses TPM on a monthly basis for all reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred by TPM in performing its obligations under such services agreement, up to certain amounts. Under such services agreement, approximately $1,200,000, $1,300,000 and $582,000 was charged to expense for the years ended December 31, 1993, 1994 and for the period from January 1, 1995 through June 12, 1995, respectively. F-33
424B1176th Page of 203TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 176th
TRUMP ATLANTIC CITY ASSOCIATES AND TRUMP PLAZA ASSOCIATES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED) TRUMP WORLD'S FAIR OPTION Under an Option Agreement with Chemical Bank ("Chemical"), Trump had an option to purchase (i) Trump World's Fair (including the land, improvements and personal property used in the operation of the hotel) and (ii) certain promissory notes made by Trump and/or certain of his affiliates and payable to Chemical (the "Chemical Notes") which are secured by certain real estate assets located in New York, unrelated to Plaza Associates. In connection with such Option Agreement, Trump assigned his rights to Plaza Associates. On June 12, 1995, the Trump World's Fair Purchase Option was exercised. The option price of $60,000,000 was funded with $58,150,000 from the capital contributed by THCR Holdings (See Note 1), and $1,850,000 of option payments made by Plaza Associates. OTHER PAYMENTS TO DONALD J. TRUMP During 1994, Plaza Associates paid to Trump $1,000,000 under a Construction Management Service Agreement. The payment was made for construction management services rendered by Trump with respect to Trump Plaza East. This payment was approved prior to disbursement by the CCC and has been classified in construction in process in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 1994 and June 12, 1995. During 1994, Plaza Associates also paid Trump a commission of approximately $572,000 for securing a retail lease at Trump Plaza. The commission has been capitalized and is being amortized to expense over the 10-year term of the lease. (9) FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS The carrying amount of the following financial instruments of Plaza Funding, Trump AC and Plaza Associates approximates fair value, as follows: (a) cash and cash equivalents, accrued interest receivables and payables are based on the short-term nature of these financial instruments, (b) CRDA bonds and deposits are based on the allowances to give effect to the below market interest rates. The estimated fair values of other financial instruments are as follows: [Download Table] DECEMBER 31, 1994 JUNE 12, 1995 ---------------------------- ---------------------------- CARRYING AMOUNT FAIR VALUE CARRYING AMOUNT FAIR VALUE --------------- ------------ --------------- ------------ 12 1/2% PIK Notes....... $ 73,987,000 $ 51,791,000 -- -- 10 7/8% Mortgage Notes.. $326,234,000 $247,122,000 $326,403,000 $298,650,000 The fair values of the PIK and Plaza Notes are based on quoted market prices obtained by Plaza Associates from its investment advisor. There are no quoted market prices for other notes payable and a reasonable estimate could not be made without incurring excessive costs. (10) SUBSEQUENT EVENTS On June 12, 1995 three newly formed entities owned by Trump--THCR, THCR Holdings and THCR Funding--completed the offering and sale of $155,000,000 of 15 1/2% Senior Secured Notes and $140,000,000 of equity (the "June 1995 Offerings"). In connection with the June 1995 Offerings, Trump contributed all of his beneficial interest in Plaza Associates (consisting of all of the outstanding capital stock of Plaza Funding, a 99% equity interest in Trump F-34
424B1177th Page of 203TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 177th
TRUMP ATLANTIC CITY ASSOCIATES AND TRUMP PLAZA ASSOCIATES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED) AC and all of the outstanding capital stock of Trump Plaza Holding, Inc.) to THCR Holdings. Trump also contributed all of his existing interests and rights to new gaming activities in both emerging and established gaming jurisdictions to THCR Holdings. The net proceeds of the June 1995 Offerings were used to repurchase or redeem the PIK Notes and PIK Note Warrants (Notes 3 and 5), finance the expansion of Trump Plaza (Notes 6 and 8) as well as to fund casino development costs in certain jurisdictions outside of Atlantic City. On January 8, 1996, THCR, Taj Mahal Holding Corp. ("Taj Holding") and THCR Merger Corp. ("Merger Sub") entered into the Agreement and Plan of Merger, as amended by the Amendment to Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as of January 31, 1996 (the "Merger Agreement"), pursuant to which Merger Sub will merge with and into Taj Holding (the "Merger"). The Merger Agreement provides that each outstanding share of Class A Common Stock of Taj Holding (the "Taj Holding Class A Common Stock") (other than Dissenting Shares (as defined in the Proxy Statement-Prospectus)) will be converted into the right to receive, at each holder's election, either (a) $30.00 in cash or (b) that number of shares of Common Stock of THCR (the "THCR Common Stock") as shall have a market value equal to $30.00. No fractional shares of THCR Common Stock will be issued in the Merger. The Merger Agreement also contemplates the following transactions occurring in connection with the Merger (the "Merger Transaction"): (a) the consummation of the offering by THCR of 12,500,000 shares of THCR Common Stock (and an amount to be issued pursuant to the underwriters' over- allotment option) (the "THCR Stock Offering") and the consummation of the offering by Trump AC and its wholly owned finance subsidiary Trump Atlantic City Funding, Inc. of $1,200,000,000 aggregate principal amount of first mortgage notes, the aggregate proceeds of which will be used, together with available cash, to (i) pay cash to those holders of Taj Holding Class A Common Stock electing to receive cash in the Merger, (ii) redeem the outstanding 11.35% Mortgage Bonds, Series A due 1999 (the "Taj Bonds") Trump Taj Mahal Funding, Inc. ("Taj Funding"), (iii) redeem the outstanding shares of Class B Common Stock of Taj Holding as required in connection with the redemption of the Taj Bonds, (iv) retire the outstanding Plaza Notes, (v) satisfy the indebtedness of Taj Associates under its loan agreement with National Westminster Bank USA, (vi) purchase certain real property used in the operation of the Taj Mahal that is currently leased from a corporation wholly owned by Trump, (vii) purchase certain real property used in the operation of Trump Plaza that is currently leased from an unaffiliated third party, (viii) make a payment to Bankers Trust Company ("Bankers Trust") to obtain releases of liens and guarantees that Bankers Trust has in connection with certain outstanding indebtedness owed by Trump to Bankers Trust, and (ix) pay related fees and expenses and provide working capital; (b) the contribution by Trump to Trump AC (on behalf, and at the direction, of THCR Holdings) of all of his direct and indirect ownership interests in Taj Associates; and (c) the contribution by THCR to Trump AC (on behalf, and at the direction, of THCR Holdings) of all of its indirect ownership interests in Taj Associates acquired in the Merger. To the extent that holders of Taj Holding Class A Common Stock elect to receive shares of THCR Common Stock in the Merger, THCR may reduce the size of the THCR Stock Offering. In addition to the shares of THCR Common Stock that may be issued in the THCR Stock Offering, THCR may issue, as part of the THCR Stock Offering, up to an additional 20% of such number of shares, to fund working capital and other general corporate purposes. The prospective transaction is subject to a number of conditions, including stockholder approval. In addition, there are a number of risks that should be considered, including: (i) the high leverage and fixed F-35
424B1178th Page of 203TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 178th
TRUMP ATLANTIC CITY ASSOCIATES AND TRUMP PLAZA ASSOCIATES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED) charges of THCR (following the consummation of the Merger Transaction); (ii) the risk in refinancing and repaying indebtedness, and the need for additional financing; (iii) THCR's holding company structure and the likelihood that dividends will not be paid for the forseeable future; (iv) the restrictions imposed on certain activities by certain debt instruments; (v) the historical results of Trump Plaza and the Taj Mahal; and (vi) risks associated with the riverboat casino at Buffington Harbor, Indiana, to be operated by a subsidiary of THCR (the "Indiana Riverboat") and the expansions at Trump Plaza and the Taj Mahal. There can be no assurance that the expansions at Trump Plaza or the Taj Mahal will be completed or that the Indiana Riverboat or any other gaming venture will open or that any of Trump Plaza's or the Taj Mahal's operations will be successful. See "Risk Factors" included elsewhere in this Prospectus for a discussion of these and other factors. F-36
424B1179th Page of 203TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 179th
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS To Trump Taj Mahal Associates and Subsidiary: We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Trump Taj Mahal Associates (a New Jersey general partnership) and Subsidiary as of December 31, 1994 and 1995, and the related consolidated statements of operations, capital (deficit) and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 1995. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of Trump Taj Mahal Associates management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Trump Taj Mahal Associates and Subsidiary as of December 31, 1994 and 1995 and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 1995, in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. Arthur Andersen LLP Roseland, New Jersey February 16, 1996 F-37
424B1180th Page of 203TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 180th
TRUMP TAJ MAHAL ASSOCIATES AND SUBSIDIARY CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS DECEMBER 31, 1994 AND 1995 (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) [Download Table] DECEMBER 31, -------------------- 1994 1995 --------- --------- ASSETS CURRENT ASSETS: Cash and cash investments.............................. $ 61,196 $ 88,941 Receivables, net of allowance of $4,059 and $5,042 for doubtful accounts (Note 1)............................ 15,443 17,215 Inventory.............................................. 6,431 7,161 Prepaid expenses and other current assets.............. 7,806 3,864 --------- --------- Total Current Assets................................. 90,876 117,181 --------- --------- PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT (Notes 1, 2, and 5): Land................................................... 37,843 37,843 Building............................................... 656,702 665,161 Furniture, fixtures and equipment...................... 160,372 174,693 Leasehold improvements................................. 31,243 31,253 --------- --------- 886,160 908,950 Less: Accumulated depreciation and amortization...... (179,375) (217,963) --------- --------- 706,785 690,987 --------- --------- OTHER ASSETS............................................. 9,951 13,625 --------- --------- Total Assets......................................... $ 807,612 $ 821,793 ========= ========= LIABILITIES AND CAPITAL CURRENT LIABILITIES: Long-term debt due currently (Note 2).................. $ 743 $ 920 Accounts payable....................................... 3,256 8,335 Accrued interest payable............................... 8,977 9,154 Due to affiliates, net (Note 3)........................ 152 974 Other current liabilities (Note 4)..................... 37,059 35,210 --------- --------- Total Current Liabilities............................ 50,187 54,593 --------- --------- OTHER LIABILITIES (Notes 2 and 3)........................ 32,912 33,373 --------- --------- LONG-TERM DEBT NET OF UNAMORTIZED DISCOUNT OF $153,597 AND $131,103 (Notes 2 and 9)............................ 656,701 694,192 --------- --------- COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (Note 5) CAPITAL (Notes 6 and 9): Contributed capital.................................... 123,765 123,765 Accumulated deficit.................................... (55,953) (84,130) --------- --------- Total Capital........................................ 67,812 39,635 --------- --------- Total Liabilities and Capital........................ $ 807,612 $ 821,793 ========= ========= The accompanying notes to financial statements are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements. F-38
424B1181st Page of 203TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 181st
TRUMP TAJ MAHAL ASSOCIATES AND SUBSIDIARY CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1993, 1994 AND 1995 (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) [Download Table] YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, ------------------------------- 1993 1994 1995 --------- --------- --------- REVENUES (Note 1): Gaming...................................... $ 442,064 $ 461,622 $ 501,378 Rooms....................................... 40,682 41,815 43,309 Food and beverage........................... 55,953 58,029 57,195 Other....................................... 16,656 17,894 15,864 --------- --------- --------- Gross revenues............................ 555,355 579,360 617,746 Less--Promotional allowances (Note 1)....... 56,444 62,178 63,998 --------- --------- --------- Net revenues.............................. 498,911 517,182 553,748 --------- --------- --------- COST AND EXPENSES: Gaming...................................... 237,566 260,472 283,786 Rooms....................................... 15,525 15,662 15,230 Food and beverage........................... 25,080 25,035 24,612 General and administrative.................. 99,424 99,629 96,843 Depreciation and amortization............... 36,858 39,750 43,387 --------- --------- --------- 414,453 440,548 463,858 --------- --------- --------- Income from operations........................ 84,458 76,634 89,890 Interest income............................... 1,382 2,019 3,922 Interest expense.............................. (108,379) (115,311) (120,435) --------- --------- --------- Net loss...................................... $ (22,539) $ (36,658) $ (26,623) ========= ========= ========= The accompanying notes to financial statements are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements. F-39
424B1182nd Page of 203TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 182nd
TRUMP TAJ MAHAL ASSOCIATES AND SUBSIDIARY CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CAPITAL (DEFICIT) FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1993, 1994 AND 1995 (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) [Download Table] ACCUMULATED TOTAL CONTRIBUTED SURPLUS CAPITAL CAPITAL (DEFICIT) (DEFICIT) ----------- ----------- --------- Balance, January 1, 1993..................... $123,765 $ 7,148 $130,913 Net loss..................................... -- (22,539) (22,539) Partnership distribution (Note 6)............ -- (1,733) (1,733) -------- -------- -------- Balance, December 31, 1993................... 123,765 (17,124) 106,641 Net loss..................................... -- (36,658) (36,658) Partnership distribution (Note 6)............ -- (2,171) (2,171) -------- -------- -------- Balance, December 31, 1994................... 123,765 (55,953) 67,812 Net loss..................................... -- (26,623) (26,623) Partnership distribution (Note 6)............ -- (1,554) (1,554) -------- -------- -------- Balance, December 31, 1995................... $123,765 $(84,130) $ 39,635 ======== ======== ======== The accompanying notes to financial statements are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements. F-40
424B1183rd Page of 203TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 183rd
TRUMP TAJ MAHAL ASSOCIATES AND SUBSIDIARY CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1993, 1994 AND 1995 (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) [Download Table] YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, ---------------------------- 1993 1994 1995 -------- -------- -------- CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: Net loss........................................ $(22,539) $(36,658) $(26,623) Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash flows provided by operating activities-- Depreciation and amortization.................. 36,858 39,750 43,387 Charges related to lease guarantee............. 1,763 2,047 2,375 Accretion of discount on Bond indebtedness..... 15,745 18,820 22,494 Other adjustments to reduce the carrying value of non-current assets........................................ 2,764 2,134 3,090 Utilization of CRDA credits.................... -- 1,500 -- Provision for doubtful accounts................ 3,472 2,974 4,508 -------- -------- -------- 38,063 30,567 49,231 Changes in operating assets and liabilities: Receivables, net............................... (2,281) (5,383) (6,280) Inventory...................................... (1,612) (1,746) (730) Other current assets........................... (39) (3,552) 3,603 Other assets................................... (766) (392) (584) Due to affiliates, net......................... 98 (381) 822 Accounts payable............................... (2,225) (678) 5,079 Accrued interest payable....................... 14,900 12,537 16,175 Other liabilities.............................. 2,496 2,450 (4,417) -------- -------- -------- Net cash flows provided by operating activities................................... 48,634 33,422 62,899 -------- -------- -------- CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: Purchase of property and equipment.............. (16,752) (23,030) (26,498) Investment in CRDA obligations.................. (5,408) (4,201) (6,073) -------- -------- -------- Net cash flows used in investing activities... (22,160) (27,231) (32,571) -------- -------- -------- CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: Repayments of borrowings........................ (759) (868) (1,029) Partnership distribution........................ (1,733) (2,171) (1,554) -------- -------- -------- Net cash flows used in financing activities... (2,492) (3,039) (2,583) -------- -------- -------- NET INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH INVESTMENTS........ 23,982 3,152 27,745 CASH AND CASH INVESTMENTS BEGINNING OF YEAR...... 34,062 58,044 61,196 -------- -------- -------- CASH AND CASH INVESTMENTS END OF YEAR............ $ 58,044 $ 61,196 $ 88,941 ======== ======== ======== SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION: Cash paid during the year for interest.......... $ 75,972 $ 79,121 $ 79,389 ======== ======== ======== SUPPLEMENTAL SCHEDULE OF NON-CASH TRANSACTIONS: Issuance of PIK bonds in lieu of cash interest.. $ 14,579 $ 12,249 $ 15,112 ======== ======== ======== The accompanying notes to financial statements are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements. F-41
424B1184th Page of 203TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 184th
TRUMP TAJ MAHAL ASSOCIATES AND SUBSIDIARY NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (1) ORGANIZATION, OPERATIONS AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES ORGANIZATION AND OPERATIONS The accompanying consolidated financial statements include those of Trump Taj Mahal Associates ("Taj Associates"), and its wholly owned subsidiary, Trump Taj Mahal Funding, Inc. ("Taj Funding"). All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in the consolidated financial statements. Taj Associates was formed on June 23, 1988 as a New Jersey limited partnership. Taj Associates was converted to a general partnership in December 1990. The current partners and their respective ownership interests are Trump Taj Mahal, Inc. ("TTMI"), 49.995%, The Trump Taj Mahal Corporation ("TTMC"), .01%, and TM/GP Corporation ("TM/GP"), the managing general partner, and a wholly owned subsidiary of Taj Mahal Holding Corp. ("Taj Holding"), 49.995%. Taj Associates was formed for the purpose of acquiring, constructing and operating the Trump Taj Mahal Casino Resort (the "Taj Mahal"), an Atlantic City hotel, casino and convention center complex. On April 2, 1990, Taj Associates opened the Taj Mahal to the public. The industry in which the Taj Mahal operates is subject to intense competition and regulatory review (See Note 5). Taj Funding was incorporated on June 3, 1988 for the purpose of raising funds through the issuance of its 14% First Mortgage Bonds, Series A, due 1998 (the "Old Bonds"), the proceeds of which were loaned to Taj Associates for construction of the Taj Mahal. During 1991, as a result of a plan of reorganization (the "1991 Taj Restructuring"), these were subsequently exchanged for Taj Funding's 11.35% Mortgage Bonds, Series A, due 1999 (the "Taj Bonds"). Since Taj Funding has no business operations, its ability to repay the principal and interest on the Taj Bonds is completely dependent on the operations of Taj Associates. Donald J. Trump ("Trump") beneficially owns 50% of Taj Associates and has pledged his total ownership interest as collateral under various debt agreements. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. REVENUE RECOGNITION Casino revenues consist of the net win from gaming activities, which is the difference between gaming wins and losses. Revenues from hotel and other services are recognized at the time the related service is performed. Taj Associates provides an allowance for doubtful accounts arising from casino, hotel and other services. The allowance is based upon a specific review of outstanding receivables as well as historical collection information. In providing this allowance, management is required to make certain estimates and assumptions regarding the timing and amount of account collections. Actual results could differ from those estimates. PROMOTIONAL ALLOWANCES Gross revenues includes the retail value of complimentary rooms, food, beverages, and other services furnished to patrons. The retail value of these promotional allowances is deducted from gross revenues to arrive at net revenues. The cost of promotional allowances is charged to operations. F-42
424B1185th Page of 203TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 185th
TRUMP TAJ MAHAL ASSOCIATES AND SUBSIDIARY NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED) The cost of promotional allowances consisted of the following: [Download Table] YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, ----------------------- 1993 1994 1995 ------- ------- ------- (IN THOUSANDS) Rooms................................................ $ 8,733 $ 9,921 $ 9,913 Food and Beverage.................................... 28,973 29,653 30,458 Other................................................ 4,678 6,735 6,994 ------- ------- ------- $42,384 $46,309 $47,365 ======= ======= ======= INCOME TAXES The accompanying financial statements do not include a provision for Federal income taxes of Taj Associates, since any income or losses allocated to the partners are reportable for Federal income tax purposes by the partners. Under the New Jersey Casino Control Commission (the "CCC") regulations, Taj Associates is required to file a New Jersey corporation business tax return. As of December 31, 1995, Taj Associates had a net operating loss carry-forward of approximately $150,000,000 for New Jersey State Income Tax purposes. No tax benefit will be reflected in the accompanying financial statements for those losses until such time that they are actually realized. INVENTORIES Inventories are carried at cost on a weighted average basis. PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT Property and equipment is recorded at cost and is depreciated on the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of assets. Estimated useful lives range from three to seven years for furniture, fixtures and equipment and 40 years for buildings and building improvements. Leasehold improvements are amortized over the term of the related lease commencing in the period these assets are placed in service. The interest expense associated with borrowings used to fund the purchase and construction of the Taj Mahal has been capitalized and is being amortized over the estimated useful life of the facility. LONG LIVED ASSETS During 1995, Taj Associates adopted the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 121, "Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets" ("SFAS 121"). SFAS 121 requires, among other things, that an entity review its long-lived assets and certain related intangibles for impairment whenever changes in circumstance indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be fully recoverable. Impairment of long-lived assets exists, if, at a minimum, the future expected cash flows (undiscounted and without interest charges), from an entity's operations are less than the carrying value of these assets. As a result of its review, Taj Associates does not believe that any impairment exists in the recoverability of its long-lived assets as of December 31, 1995. CASH AND CASH INVESTMENTS Cash and cash investments include hotel and casino funds, funds on deposit with banks and temporary investments having a maturity of three months or less. F-43
424B1186th Page of 203TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 186th
TRUMP TAJ MAHAL ASSOCIATES AND SUBSIDIARY NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED) (2) LONG-TERM DEBT Long-term debt consisted of the following at December 31: [Download Table] 1994 1995 --------- --------- (IN THOUSANDS) First Mortgage Bonds (a)............................... $ 765,130 $ 780,242 Unamortized discount................................... (153,597) (131,103) --------- --------- Net.................................................... 611,533 649,139 Bank term loan (b)..................................... 45,138 44,944 Other.................................................. 773 1,029 --------- --------- Total................................................ 657,444 695,112 Less: Current portion................................ (743) (920) --------- --------- $ 656,701 $ 694,192 ========= ========= --------------------- (a) Taj Bonds bear interest of 11.35% and are due November 15, 1999. Each Taj Bond, together with one share of Taj Holding's Class B redeemable common stock trade together as a unit ("Units"), and may not be transferred separately. Interest on the Taj Bonds is due semi-annually on each November 15 and May 15. Interest on the Taj Bonds must be paid in cash on each interest payment date at the rate of 9.375% per annum (the "Mandatory Cash Interest Amount"). In addition to the Mandatory Cash Interest Amount, effective May 15, 1992 and annually thereafter, an additional amount of interest (the "Additional Amount") in cash or additional Taj Bonds or a combination thereof, is payable equal to the difference between 11.35% of the outstanding principal amount of the Taj Bonds and the Mandatory Cash Interest Amount previously paid. To the extent that there is excess available cash flow ("EACF") of Taj Associates, as defined in the related indenture, for the immediately preceding calendar year, Taj Funding will pay the Additional Amount in cash up to 10.28% and the balance thereof may be paid at the option of Taj Funding in cash or additional Units, provided that an equivalent amount of cash is used to purchase or redeem Units. Additional Taj Bonds issued on October 4, 1991 amounted to approximately $7,208,000. For the period from the issuance of the Taj Bonds, October 4, 1991, through December 31, 1992, there was no EACF. Accordingly, Taj Funding paid the Additional Amounts on May 15, 1993 and May 15, 1992 through the issuance of approximately $14,579,000 and $8,844,000, respectively, in additional Taj Bonds. Of the $14,870,000 Additional Amount due May 15, 1994, $2,621,000 was paid in cash and the $12,249,000 balance in Taj Bonds. Of the $15,112,000 Additional Amount due May 15, 1995, Taj Associates satisfied the entire obligation through the issuance of Taj Bonds. Since Taj Funding has no business operations, its ability to repay the principal and interest on the Bonds is completely dependent on the operations of Taj Associates. The Taj Bonds are guaranteed as to payment of principal and interest by Taj Associates and are collateralized by substantially all Taj Associates' property. In accordance with AICPA Statement of Position 90-7, "Financial Reporting By Entities in Reorganization Under the Bankruptcy Code," the Taj Bonds when issued were stated at the present value of amounts to be paid, determined at current interest rates (effective rate of approximately 18%). The effective interest rate of the Taj Bonds was determined based on the trading price of the Taj Bonds for a specific period. Stating the debt at its approximate present value resulted in a reduction of approximately $204,276,000 in the carrying amount of the Taj Bonds. This gain is being offset by increased interest costs over the period of the Taj Bonds to accrete such bonds to their face value at maturity. At December 31, 1995, the unaccreted balance of this discount approximated $131,103,000. The current interest rates of other borrowings approximated their stated interest rates as of the effective date. The accretion amounted to approximately $15,745,000 in 1993, $18,820,000 in 1994 and $22,494,000 in 1995, and is included in interest expense. F-44
424B1187th Page of 203TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 187th
TRUMP TAJ MAHAL ASSOCIATES AND SUBSIDIARY NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED) (b) On November 3, 1989, Taj Associates entered into a loan agreement with National Westminster Bank USA (the "NatWest Loan") which provided financing up to $50,000,000 for certain items of furniture, fixtures and equipment installed in the Taj Mahal. The terms of the NatWest Loan were modified in 1991 as part of the 1991 Taj Restructuring. The restructured NatWest Loan bears interest at 9 3/8% per annum. Principal and interest is payable monthly in the fixed amount of $373,000 to be applied first to accrued interest and the balance to the extent available, to principal, through maturity, November 15, 1999. Additionally, on May 15 of each year (May 15, 1992 through May 15, 1999), to the extent principal is still outstanding, NatWest will receive 16.5% of the EACF of the preceding calendar year in excess of the Additional Amount, to be applied first to accrued but unpaid interest, and then to principal. The NatWest Loan is secured by a first priority lien on the furniture, fixtures and equipment acquired with the proceeds of the NatWest Loan plus any after acquired furniture, fixtures and equipment that replaces such property, or of the same type, provided, however, that the NatWest Loan may be subordinated to a lien to secure purchase money financing of such after acquired property up to 50% of the value of such after acquired property. In November 1991, Taj Associates obtained a working capital line of credit in the amount of $25,000,000 with a maturity of five years. In September 1994, Taj Associates extended the maturity to November 1999, in consideration of modifications of the terms of the facility. Interest on advances under the line are at prime plus 3% with a minimum of 0.666% per month. The Agreement provides for a 3/4% annual fee and a 1/2% unused line fee and contains various covenants. During 1993 and 1994, no amounts were outstanding under the line. During 1994 and 1995, no amounts were outstanding under the line. Aggregate annual maturities of long-term debt at accreted value are as follows: [Download Table] 1996............................. $ 920,000 1997............................. 529,000 1998............................. 268,000 1999............................. 824,498,000 2000............................. 0 Thereafter....................... 0 The above maturity schedule does not reflect the proposed recapitalization described in Note 9. The ability of Taj Associates and Taj Funding to repay their long-term debt when due will depend on their ability to either generate cash from operations sufficient for such purposes or to refinance such indebtedness. Management does not currently anticipate that cash will be sufficient and that repayment will likely depend upon the ability to refinance such indebtedness. The future operating performance and ability to refinance such indebtedness will be subject to the then prevailing economic conditions, industry conditions and numerous other financial, business and other factors, many of which are beyond the control of Taj Associates and Taj Funding. There can be no assurances that the future operating performance of Taj Associates will be sufficient to meet these repayment obligations or that the general state of the economy, the status of the capital markets generally or the receptiveness of the capital markets to the gaming industry will be conducive to refinancing or other attempts to raise capital. F-45
424B1188th Page of 203TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 188th
TRUMP TAJ MAHAL ASSOCIATES AND SUBSIDIARY NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED) (3) TRANSACTIONS WITH AFFILIATES Taj Associates has engaged in certain transactions with Trump and entities that are wholly or partially owned by Trump. Amounts owed to (receivable from) at December 31 are as follows: [Download Table] 1994 1995 ------- ------- (IN THOUSANDS) Donald J. Trump (a)......................................... $ 253 $ 643 Trump Taj Mahal Realty Corp. ("Realty Corp.") (b)........... -- -- Trump's Castle Associates (c)............................... 30 164 Trump Plaza Associates (c).................................. (131) 167 ------- ------ $ 152 $ 974 ======= ====== --------------------- (a) Taj Associates has entered into a Services Agreement (the "Services Agreement"), which provides that Trump will render to Taj Associates marketing, advertising, promotional and related services with respect to the business operations of Taj Associates. In consideration for the services to be rendered, Taj Associates will pay an annual fee equal to 1.5% of Taj Associates earnings before interest, taxes and depreciation, as defined, less capital expenditures and partnership distributions for such year, with a minimum base fee of $500,000. The services fee is payable monthly through November 15, 1999, although the agreement provides for earlier termination under certain events. Portions of the fee have been assigned to First Fidelity Bank ("First Fidelity") in connection with the First Fidelity Loan (as defined) to Realty Corp. which has been guaranteed by Trump. For the years ended December 31, 1993, 1994 and 1995, Taj Associates incurred $1,566,000, $1,353,000 and $1,743,000, respectively, under the Services Agreement. In addition, during 1993, 1994 and 1995, Taj Associates reimbursed Mr. Trump $232,000, $224,000 and $261,000, respectively, for expenses pursuant to the Services Agreement, of which $127,000, $149,000 and $164,000, respectively, was incurred to an affiliate for air transportation. (b) The term of the lease between Taj Associates and Realty Corp. is through 2023 and provides for base rentals payable by Taj Associates, prior to the time that the NatWest Loan is paid in full, of $2,725,000 per year, plus 3 1/2% of the EACF in excess of the Additional Amount and, upon payment in full of the NatWest Loan, increasing to include the payments to which NatWest is otherwise entitled under the amended NatWest Agreement (Note 2). The amended lease was assigned by Realty to First Fidelity. The first $3,300,000 received by First Fidelity each year will be applied to the interest due on the Realty Corp. loan (the "First Fidelity Loan"). Any additional sums paid will also reduce Taj Associates guarantee (see below) and the principal amount of the First Fidelity Loan. The First Fidelity Loan is secured by a first mortgage lien on the underlying parcels owned by Realty Corp. Pursuant to a limited subordinated guarantee Taj Associates will, under certain circumstances, reimburse First Fidelity for any deficiency in the amount owed to First Fidelity upon maturity of the First Fidelity Loan, up to a maximum of $30,000,000, provided that First Fidelity first pursues its first mortgage lien on the parcels, and provided further that the Taj Bonds have been paid in full. Inasmuch as Taj Associates' lease payments are Realty Corp's sole source of funds to satisfy the First Fidelity Loan and the amount of the First Fidelity Loan exceeds the estimated fair market value of the land by more than $30,000,000, Taj Associates recorded the present value of the maximum guarantee amount as of October 4, 1991. Discounted at 15%, a reasonable incremental cost of capital, the obligation amounted to approximately $9,103,000. This obligation is being accreted as interest expense over the life of the Taj Bonds and is included in Other Liabilities in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. The accretion amounted to approximately $1,763,000, $2,047,000 and $2,375,000 for the years ended December 31, 1993, 1994 and 1995, respectively. (c) Taj Associates engages in various transactions with the two other Atlantic City hotel/casinos owned by Trump. These transactions are charged at cost or normal selling price in the case of retail items and F-46
424B1189th Page of 203TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 189th
TRUMP TAJ MAHAL ASSOCIATES AND SUBSIDIARY NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED) include the utilization of fleet maintenance and limousine services, certain shared professional fees and payroll costs as well as complimentary services offered to customers. During 1993, Taj Associates incurred approximately $1,100,000 and $83,000 of costs for these services from Trump's Castle Casino Resort ("Trump's Castle") and Trump Plaza, respectively. In addition, Taj Associates charged $256,000 and $255,000 to Trump's Castle and Trump Plaza, respectively, for similar services. During 1994, Taj Associates incurred approximately $1,167,000 and $149,000 of costs for these services from Trump's Castle and Trump Plaza, respectively. In addition, Taj Associates charged $235,000 and $361,000 to Trump's Castle and Trump Plaza, respectively, for similar services. During 1995, Taj Associates incurred approximately $1,072,000 and $445,000 of costs for these services from Trump's Castle and Trump Plaza, respectively. In addition, Taj Associates charged $113,000 and $188,000 to Trump's Castle and Trump Plaza, respectively, for similar services. (4) OTHER CURRENT LIABILITIES The components of other current liabilities at December 31 consisted of the following: [Download Table] 1994 1995 ------- ------- (IN THOUSANDS) Payroll and related costs.................................... $12,632 $13,533 Self-insurance reserves...................................... 6,800 5,697 Advertising/Marketing costs.................................. 3,242 1,621 Advance deposits............................................. 3,022 1,236 Unredeemed chip liability.................................... 2,725 3,148 Other........................................................ 8,638 9,975 ------- ------- $37,059 $35,210 ======= ======= Self insurance reserves represent the estimated amounts of uninsured claims settlements related to employee health medical costs, workmen's compensation and other legal proceedings in the normal course of business (see Note 5). These reserves are established by management based upon a specific review of open claims as of the balance sheet date as well as historical claims settlement experience. Actual results may differ from those reserve amounts. (5) COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES LEASES AND EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENTS Taj Associates has entered into employment agreements with certain key employees and lease agreements for land, office and warehouse space under noncancelable operating leases expiring at various dates through 2023. At December 31, 1995, minimum commitments under these arrangements are as follows: [Download Table] 1996............................................................. $ 8,639,000 1997............................................................. $ 5,867,000 1998............................................................. $ 3,534,000 1999............................................................. $ 2,865,000 2000............................................................. $ 2,725,000 Thereafter....................................................... $62,675,000 Rent expense was approximately $4,520,000, $5,027,000 and $4,546,000 for the years ended December 31, 1993, 1994 and 1995, respectively. F-47
424B1190th Page of 203TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 190th
TRUMP TAJ MAHAL ASSOCIATES AND SUBSIDIARY NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED) Taj Associates leases the pier extending from the Taj Mahal 1,000 feet into the Atlantic Ocean (the "Steel Pier") from Realty Corp. A condition imposed on Taj Associates' Coastal Area Facilities Review Act ("CAFRA") permit (which, in turn, is a condition of Taj Associates' casino license) initially required that Taj Associates begin construction of certain improvements on the Steel Pier by October 1992, which improvements were to be completed within 18 months of commencement. Taj Associates initially proposed a concept to improve the Steel Pier, the estimated cost of which was $30,000,000. Such concept was approved by the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, the agency which administers CAFRA. In March 1993, Taj Associates obtained a modification of its CAFRA permit providing for the extension of the required commencement and completion dates of the improvements to the Steel Pier for one year based upon an interim use of the Steel Pier for an amusement park. In 1994, 1995 and February 1996, Taj Associates received an additional one-year extension (most recently through October 1996) of the required commencement and completion dates of the improvements of the Steel Pier based upon the same interim use of the Steel Pier as an amusement park. EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLAN Effective January 1, 1989, Taj Associates established the Taj Mahal Retirement Savings Plan ("the Benefit Plan") for its employees over 21 years of age who are not covered by a collective bargaining agreement. The Benefit Plan is structured to qualify for favorable tax treatment under Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code and allows eligible participants to contribute up to 15% of their salary (certain limits apply, as defined) to the Benefit Plan with a matching Partnership contribution of 50% of the first 4% of such employee salary contribution. The funds are invested by a Benefit Plan trustee. Taj Associates' contributions for the years ended December 31, 1993, 1994 and 1995 were $870,000, $938,000 and $1,069,000, respectively. CASINO LICENSE RENEWAL Taj Funding and Taj Associates are subject to regulation and licensing by the CCC. Taj Associates' casino license must be renewed periodically, is not transferable, is dependent upon the financial stability of Taj Associates and can be revoked at anytime. Upon revocation, suspension for more than 120 days, or failure to renew the casino license due to Taj Associates' financial condition or for any other reason, the New Jersey Casino Control Act (the "Casino Control Act") provides that the CCC may appoint a conservator to take possession of and title to the hotel and casino's business and property, subject to all valid liens, claims and encumbrances. On June 22, 1995, the CCC extended Taj Associates' casino license for four years through March 31, 1999. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS Taj Associates, its partners, certain of its employees and Taj Funding are involved in various legal proceedings incurred in the normal course of business. In the opinion of management of Taj Associates, the expected disposition of these proceedings would not have a material adverse effect on Taj Associates or Taj Funding's financial condition or results of operations. FEDERAL INCOME TAX EXAMINATIONS Taj Associates is currently involved in an examination with the Internal Revenue Service ("IRS") concerning Taj Associates' federal partnership income tax returns for the tax years 1989 through 1991. While any adjustment which results from this examination could affect Taj Associates' state income tax return, Taj Associates does not believe the resolution of the matter will have a material adverse effect on its financial condition or results of operations. F-48
424B1191st Page of 203TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 191st
TRUMP TAJ MAHAL ASSOCIATES AND SUBSIDIARY NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED) INVESTMENT OBLIGATION The Casino Control Act requires Taj Associates to make qualified investments, as defined, in New Jersey, or pay an investment alternative tax to the New Jersey Casino Reinvestment Development Authority ("CRDA"). Commencing in 1991, and for a period of thirty years thereafter, Taj Associates must either obtain investment tax credits, as defined, in an amount equivalent to 1.25% of its gross casino revenues or pay an alternative tax of 2.5% of its gross casino revenues, as defined. Investment tax credits may be obtained by making qualified investments, by depositing funds which may be converted to bonds by the CRDA or by donating previously deposited funds in exchange for future credits against tax liability. Taj Associates intends to satisfy its investment obligation primarily by depositing funds and donations of funds deposited. During 1994, Taj Associates contributed $9,500,000 of previous CRDA deposits, the carrying value of which was $4,750,000. Of the carrying value, $3,250,000 were allocated to leasehold improvements upon completion of the improvements during 1995, and $1,500,000 was a donation of previously deposited funds, which became a credit utilized in 1994 as a reduction of current year obligations. The deposits and bonds traditionally bear interest at below-market interest rates; accordingly, Taj Associates has reduced its carrying value of the deposits by 50% and charged operations approximately $2,764,000, $2,134,000 and $3,090,000 in 1993, 1994 and 1995, respectively. Taj Associates is required to satisfy its obligations to the CRDA through deposits on a quarterly basis. Taj Associates periodically reviews the carrying value of these deposits and investments in accordance with its policies for all long-lived assets as described in Note 1. (6) TAJ ASSOCIATES DISTRIBUTION Taj Associates is obligated to reimburse Taj Holding for its operating expenses which consist of directors and officers liability insurance, board of director fees and expenses, and administrative expenses. Total expenses for the years ended December 31, 1993, 1994 and 1995 approximated $1,733,000, $2,171,000 and $1,554,000, respectively. (7) FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS The carrying amount of the following financial instruments of Taj Funding and Taj Associates approximates fair value, as follows: (a) cash and cash equivalents and accrued interest payable are based on the short-term nature of the financial instruments; and (b) CRDA deposits are based on the valuation allowances to give effect to the below market interest rates (See Note 5). The estimated fair values of the other financial instruments are as follows (Note 2): [Download Table] DECEMBER 31, ----------------- 1994 1995 -------- -------- (IN THOUSANDS) 11.35% Mortgage Bonds (a) Carrying Amount......................................... $611,533 $649,139 Fair Value.............................................. 512,638 750,983 --------------------- (a) The fair value of the Taj Bonds is based on quoted market prices as of December 31, 1994 and 1995. There are no quoted market prices for the NatWest Loan and other debt and a reasonable estimate of their value could not be made without incurring excessive costs. See Note 9 regarding the proposed redemption of these borrowings. F-49
424B1192nd Page of 203TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 192nd
TRUMP TAJ MAHAL ASSOCIATES AND SUBSIDIARY NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED) (8) FINANCIAL INFORMATION--TAJ FUNDING Financial information relating to Taj Funding as of and for the years ended December 31, 1994 and 1995 is as follows (in thousands): [Download Table] 1994 1995 -------- -------- Total Assets (including First Mortgage Note Receivable of $765,130 and $780,242 and related interest receivable)...... $783,562 $799,037 ======== ======== Total Liabilities and Capital (including Taj Bonds payable of $765,130 and $780,242 and related interest payable)......... $783,562 $799,037 ======== ======== Interest Income.............................................. $ 86,322 $ 87,914 ======== ======== Interest Expense............................................. $ 86,322 $ 87,914 ======== ======== Net Income................................................... $ -- $ -- ======== ======== (9) PROPOSED RECAPITALIZATION On January 8, 1996, Trump Hotels & Casino Resorts, Inc. ("THCR"), Taj Holding and THCR Merger Corp. ("Merger Sub") entered into the Agreement and Plan of Merger, as amended by Amendment to Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of January 31, 1996 (the "Merger Agreement"), pursuant to which Merger Sub will merge with and into Taj Holding (the "Merger"). The Merger Agreement provides that each outstanding share of Class A Common Stock of Taj Holding (the "Taj Holding Class A Common Stock") (other than Dissenting Shares (as defined in the Proxy Statement-Prospectus) will be converted into the right to receive, at each election, either (a) $30.00 in cash or (b) that number of shares of Common Stock of THCR ("THCR Common Stock") as shall have a market value equal to $30.00. No fractional shares of THCR Common Stock will be issued in the Merger. The Merger Agreement also contemplates the following transactions occurring in connection with the Merger: (a) the consummation of the offering by THCR of 12,500,000 shares of THCR Common Stock (and an amount to be issued pursuant to the underwriters' over- allotment option) (the "THCR Stock Offering") and the consummation of the offering by Trump Atlantic City Associates ("Trump AC") and its wholly owned finance subsidiary Trump Atlantic City Funding, Inc. of $1,200,000,000 aggregate principal amount of first mortgage notes, the aggregate proceeds of which will be used, together with available cash, to (i) pay cash to those holders of Taj Holding Class A Common Stock electing to receive cash in the Merger, (ii) redeem the Taj Bonds, (iii) redeem the outstanding shares of Class B Common Stock of Taj Holding as required in connection with the redemption of the Taj Bonds, (iv) retire the outstanding 10 7/8% Mortgage Notes due 2001 of Trump Plaza Funding, Inc., (v) satisfy the indebtedness of Taj Associates under the NatWest Loan, (vi) purchase certain real property used in the operation of the Taj Mahal that is currently leased from a corporation wholly owned by Trump, (vii) purchase certain real property used in the operation of Trump Plaza Hotel and Casino ("Trump Plaza") that is currently leased from an unaffiliated third party, (viii) make a payment to Bankers Trust Company ("Bankers Trust") to obtain releases of liens and guarantees that Bankers Trust has in connection with certain outstanding indebtedness owed by Trump to Bankers Trust, and (ix) pay related fees and expenses and provide working capital; (b) the contribution by Trump to Trump AC of all of his direct and indirect ownership interests in Taj Associates; and (c) the contribution by THCR to Trump AC of all its indirect ownership interests in Taj Associates acquired in the Merger. F-50
424B1193rd Page of 203TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 193rd
TRUMP TAJ MAHAL ASSOCIATES AND SUBSIDIARY NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED) To the extent that holders of Taj Holding Class A Common Stock elect to receive shares of THCR Common Stock in the Merger, THCR may reduce the size of the THCR Stock Offering. In addition to the shares of THCR Common Stock that may be issued in the THCR Stock Offering, THCR may issue, as part of the THCR Stock Offering, up to an additional 20% of such number of shares, to fund working capital and other general corporate purposes. The prospective transaction is subject to a number of conditions, including stockholder approval. In addition, there are a number of risks that should be considered, including, (i) the high leverage and fixed charges of THCR; (ii) the risk in refinancing and repaying indebtedness, and the need for additional financing; (iii) THCR's holding company structure and the likelihood that dividends will not be paid for the forseeable future; (iv) the restrictions imposed on certain activities by certain debt instruments; (v) the historical results of Trump Plaza and the Taj Mahal; and (vi) risks associated with the riverboat casino at Buffington Harbor, Indiana, to be operated by a subsidiary of THCR (the "Indiana Riverboat") and the expansions at Trump Plaza and the Taj Mahal. There can be no assurance that the expansions at Trump Plaza or the Taj Mahal will be completed or that the Indiana Riverboat or any other gaming venture will open or that any of THCR's or the Taj Mahal's operations will be successful. See "Risk Factors" included elsewhere in this Prospectus for a discussion of these other factors. (10) SELECTED QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA (UNAUDITED) [Download Table] FIRST SECOND THIRD FOURTH QUARTER QUARTER QUARTER QUARTER -------- -------- -------- -------- (IN THOUSANDS) 1993 ---- Net Revenues............................. $110,382 $126,364 $141,597 $120,568 Income from Operations................... 13,014 23,181 30,812 17,451 Net Income (Loss)........................ (13,003) (3,192) 4,212 (10,556) 1994 ---- Net Revenues............................. $111,297 $127,254 $147,987 $130,644 Income from Operations................... 7,902 14,980 31,308 22,444 Net Income (Loss)........................ (20,761) (13,847) 3,286 (5,336) 1995 ---- Net Revenues............................. $117,595 $141,893 $157,808 $136,452 Income from Operations................... 10,298 26,986 35,120 17,486 Net Income (Loss)........................ (18,511) (1,642) 6,445 (12,915) F-51
424B1194th Page of 203TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 194th
[Rendering of Trump Indiana Casino at Buffington Harbor] [Rendering of Trump Indiana Gaming Vessel] [Rendering of the Proposed Taj Circus Casino] TRUMP [LOGO] HOTELS & CASINO RESORTS [Renderings of the Taj Mahal's Three Proposed Themed Restaurants; from left to right: Hard Rock Cafe(R), All Star Cafe(R) and Rainforest Cafe(R)]
424B1195th Page of 203TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 195th
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- NO DEALER, SALESPERSON OR OTHER PERSON HAS BEEN AUTHORIZED TO GIVE ANY INFOR- MATION OR TO MAKE ANY REPRESENTATIONS NOT CONTAINED IN THIS PROSPECTUS AND, IF GIVEN OR MADE, SUCH INFORMATION OR REPRESENTATIONS MUST NOT BE RELIED UPON AS HAVING BEEN AUTHORIZED BY THE COMPANY OR ANY OF THE UNDERWRITERS. THIS PROSPEC- TUS DOES NOT CONSTITUTE AN OFFER TO SELL OR A SOLICITATION OF AN OFFER TO BUY THE SHARES BY ANYONE IN ANY JURISDICTION IN WHICH SUCH OFFER OR SOLICITATION IS NOT AUTHORIZED, OR IN WHICH THE PERSON MAKING THE OFFER OR SOLICITATION IS NOT QUALIFIED TO DO SO, OR TO ANY PERSON TO WHOM IT IS UNLAWFUL TO MAKE SUCH OFFER OR SOLICITATION. NEITHER THE DELIVERY OF THIS PROSPECTUS NOR ANY SALE MADE HEREUNDER SHALL, UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES, CREATE ANY IMPLICATION THAT THE IN- FORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS CORRECT AS OF ANY TIME SUBSEQUENT TO THE DATE HEREOF. ------------ TABLE OF CONTENTS [Download Table] PAGE Prospectus Summary....................................................... 3 Risk Factors............................................................. 22 Use of Proceeds.......................................................... 39 Price Range of Common Stock.............................................. 40 Dividend Policy.......................................................... 40 Capitalization........................................................... 41 Selected Historical Consolidated Financial Information................... 42 Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations........................................................... 45 Unaudited Pro Forma Financial Information................................ 56 Business................................................................. 62 Regulatory Matters....................................................... 95 Management............................................................... 108 Certain Transactions..................................................... 125 Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management........... 127 Description of Capital Stock............................................. 128 Description of the THCR Holdings Partnership Agreement................... 132 Shares Eligible for Future Sale.......................................... 137 Special Tax Considerations for Foreign Shareholders...................... 138 Underwriting............................................................. 140 Legal Matters............................................................ 142 Experts.................................................................. 142 Available Information.................................................... 142 Index to Financial Statements............................................ F-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 12,500,000 SHARES TRUMP HOTEL & CASINO RESORTS TRUMP HOTELS & CASINO RESORTS, INC. COMMON STOCK ---------------- PROSPECTUS ---------------- DONALDSON, LUFKIN & JENRETTE SECURITIES CORPORATION SALOMON BROTHERS INC BT SECURITIES CORPORATION SANDS BROTHERS & CO., LTD. APRIL 11, 1996 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
424B1196th Page of 203TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 196th
[ALTERNATE COVER PAGE] PROSPECTUS APRIL 11, 1996 TRUMP HOTELS & CASINO RESORTS 500,000 SHARES TRUMP HOTELS & CASINO RESORTS, INC. COMMON STOCK All of the shares of Common Stock ("Common Stock") offered hereby (the "Stock Offering") are being issued by Trump Hotels & Casino Resorts, Inc. (the "Company") in a non-underwritten sale. The Stock Offering is part of a comprehensive plan (the "Merger Transaction") relating to the acquisition (the "Merger") of Trump Taj Mahal Associates ("Taj Associates"), the owner and operator of the Trump Taj Mahal Casino Resort (the "Taj Mahal"), by Trump Hotels & Casino Resorts Holdings, L.P., a subsidiary of the Company ("THCR Holdings"), the issuance of shares of Common Stock by the Company of shares of Common Stock in an underwritten public offering (the "Underwritten Offering"), and the refinancing of the debt obligations of Taj Associates and Trump Plaza Associates ("Plaza Associates"), the owner and operator of the Trump Plaza Hotel and Casino ("Trump Plaza"). Upon consummation of the Merger Transaction, Trump Atlantic City Associates ("Trump AC"), a wholly owned subsidiary of THCR Holdings, will wholly own Plaza Associates and Taj Associates. In addition to the shares of Common Stock to be issued in the Stock Offering and the Underwritten Offering, the Company may issue shares of Common Stock pursuant to the Merger. As part of the Merger Transaction and concurrently with the Stock Offering, Trump AC and Trump Atlantic City Funding, Inc. ("Trump AC Funding"), a wholly owned finance subsidiary of Trump AC, are offering $1.2 billion aggregate principal amount of first mortgage notes (the "Mortgage Notes") (the "Mortgage Note Offering"). Consummation of the Stock Offering and the Underwritten Offering are conditioned upon the consummation of the other transactions contemplated by the Merger Transaction (including the Mortgage Note Offering). The Common Stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange ("NYSE") under the symbol "DJT." On April 11, 1996, the closing price of the Common Stock on the NYSE was $31 1/4 per share. See "Price Range of Common Stock." INVESTMENT IN THE SECURITIES OFFERED HEREBY INVOLVES A HIGH DEGREE OF RISK. SEE "RISK FACTORS" BEGINNING ON PAGE 22 FOR A DISCUSSION OF CERTAIN FACTORS THAT SHOULD BE CONSIDERED IN CONNECTION WITH AN INVESTMENT IN THE COMMON STOCK OFFERED HEREBY. THESE SECURITIES HAVE NOT BEEN APPROVED OR DISAPPROVED BY THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ANY STATE SECURITIES COMMISSION NOR HAS THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ANY STATE SECURITIES COMMISSION PASSED UPON THE ACCURACY OR ADEQUACY OF THIS PROSPECTUS. ANY REPRESENTATION TO THE CONTRARY IS A CRIMINAL OFFENSE. NEITHER THE NEW JERSEY CASINO CONTROL COMMISSION, THE INDIANA GAMING COMMISSION NOR ANY OTHER REGULATORY AUTHORITY HAS PASSED UPON THE ACCURACY OR ADEQUACY OF THIS PROSPECTUS. ANY REPRESENTATION TO THE CONTRARY IS UNLAWFUL.
424B1197th Page of 203TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 197th
[ALTERNATE PAGE 7] City. In addition, the New Jersey Casino Redevelopment Authority ("CRDA") is currently overseeing the development of a new convention center. When completed, the approximately $250 million convention center will be the largest exhibition space between New York City and Washington, D.C. The new convention center, currently scheduled to open in January 1997, will be located at the base of the Atlantic City Expressway. Trump Plaza is adjacent to the existing Atlantic City Convention Center and will also be one of the closest casino hotels to the new convention center, which as currently planned would hold approximately 500,000 square feet of exhibit and pre-function space, 45 meeting rooms, food-service facilities and a 1,600-car underground parking garage. An additional planned infrastructure improvement is the State of New Jersey's approximately $125 million capital plan to upgrade and expand the Atlantic City International Airport. The Company believes that, as leading Atlantic City attractions, the Atlantic City Properties will attract a large portion of any increase in the number of potential casino hotel patrons. THE INDIANA RIVERBOAT The Indiana Riverboat, currently scheduled to open for business in the second quarter of 1996, will feature an approximately 288-foot luxury yacht with approximately 37,000 square feet of gaming space with 1,500 slot machines, 73 table games and capacity for approximately 2,450 passengers and 300 employees and will be one of the largest riverboat casinos in the United States. Trump Indiana is one of 11 riverboat gaming projects permitted under current Indiana law and one of only five to be located in northern Indiana. The Indiana Riverboat's principal market will be the approximately 6.8 million people residing within 50 miles of Buffington Harbor in the greater Chicago metropolitan area. Approximately 11.2 million and 24.2 million people live within a 100- and 200-mile radius of Buffington Harbor, respectively, encompassing portions of the states of Indiana, Illinois, Michigan, Ohio and Wisconsin (the "Great Lakes Market"). Through the use of the "Trump" name and systematic marketing programs, the Company will seek to attract drive-in customers to the Indiana Riverboat. Casinos currently operating in the Great Lakes Market have generally been very successful, achieving operating results exceeding those of most new jurisdictional markets. The Company believes that these operating results indicate that the Great Lakes Market should be capable of absorbing significant capacity expansion in the future. Under current regulations in Indiana, most games typically available in Atlantic City casinos will be permitted on the Indiana Riverboat. Riverboat casinos in Indiana will be permitted to stay open 24 hours per day, 365 days per year and to extend credit and accept credit charge cards, with no loss or wagering limits. THE STOCK OFFERING [Download Table] Common Stock Offered.................. 500,000 shares Common Stock to be outstanding after the Merger Transaction............... 23,377,718 shares(/1/) New York Stock Exchange Symbol........ DJT -------------------- (1) Does not include (i) 6,680,723 shares of Common Stock (subject to certain adjustments) issuable to Trump upon conversion of his limited partnership interest in THCR Holdings; (ii) 1,391,584 shares of Common Stock (subject to certain adjustments) issuable to Trump Taj Mahal, Inc. ("TTMI"), a corporation wholly owned by Trump, upon conversion of its limited partnership interests in THCR Holdings; (iii) 133,333 shares of Common Stock issuable upon exercise of options granted to the Chief Executive Officer of the Company pursuant to the 1995 Stock Plan; (iv) a phantom stock unit award (representing the right to receive 66,666 shares of Common Stock on June 12, 1997) granted to the Chief Executive Officer of the Company pursuant to the 1995 Stock Plan; (v) 733,334 additional shares reserved for issuance pursuant to the 1995 Stock Incentive Plan; (vi) 1,800,000 shares of Common Stock underlying the warrant to be issued to Trump in connection with the Merger Transaction (a) 600,000 shares of which may be purchased on or before the third anniversary of the issuance of the warrant at $30.00 per share, (b) 600,000 shares of which may be purchased on or before the fourth anniversary of the issuance of the warrant at $35.00 per share, and (c) 600,000 shares of which may be purchased on or before the fifth anniversary of the issuance of the warrant at $40.00 per share; or (vii) any shares of Common Stock which may be issued in the Merger. Also excludes shares of Class B Stock of the Company held and to be held by Trump and TTMI which represent non-economic voting interest in the Company. Includes an estimation of the number of fractional shares of Common Stock to be issued in the Merger. 7
424B1198th Page of 203TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 198th
[ALTERNATE PAGE 8] THE MORTGAGE NOTE OFFERING (Offered by Trump AC and Trump AC Funding exclusively pursuant to a separate prospectus.) Concurrently with and as a condition to consummation of the Stock Offering and the Underwritten Offering, Trump AC and Trump AC Funding will issue $1.2 billion of Mortgage Notes pursuant to the Mortgage Note Offering. Trump AC Funding, a Delaware corporation, was recently formed for the sole purpose of, and will engage in no activities or business other than in connection with, the issuance of the Mortgage Notes. Certain terms of the Mortgage Notes are described under "Business--Certain Indebtedness." The Mortgage Note Offering, the Stock Offering and the Underwritten Offering (collectively, the "Offerings") are part of the comprehensive plan relating to the Merger of a subsidiary of the company with and into Taj Mahal Holding Corp. ("Taj Holding"), which currently beneficially owns a 50% equity interest in Taj Associates; the contribution by the Company to Trump AC (on behalf, and at the direction, of THCR Holdings) of all of its direct and indirect ownership interests in Taj Associates acquired in the Merger; the contribution by Trump of the remaining 50% equity interest in Taj Associates to Trump AC (on behalf, and at the direction, of THCR Holdings); and the refinancing of substantially all of the outstanding indebtedness of Taj Associates and Plaza Associates. The consummation of the Stock Offering and the Underwritten Offering are conditioned upon the consummation of each transaction contemplated by the Merger Transaction, including the Senior Note Consent Solicitation (as defined), the Plaza Note Consent Solicitation (as defined), the Plaza Note Purchase (as defined) and the Mortgage Note Offering. RISK FACTORS Prospective investors should carefully evaluate the matters set forth herein, including those under the heading "Risk Factors." Factors to be considered include: . the high leverage and fixed charges of the Company . the Company's holding company structure and the likelihood that dividends will not be paid for the foreseeable future . the risk in refinancing and repayment of indebtedness, and the need for additional financing . the restrictions on certain activities imposed by certain debt instruments . the historical results of Trump Plaza and the Taj Mahal, including past net losses . conflicts of interest . control by and the involvement of Trump . risks associated with the Trump Plaza Expansion and the Taj Mahal Expansion . risks relating to the Indiana Riverboat . competition in the gaming industry . reliance on certain key personnel . the strict regulation by gaming authorities, including the potential disqualification of holders of Common Stock . considerations with respect to the acquisition and development of additional gaming ventures . limitations on the Company's license of the "Trump" name . fraudulent transfer considerations . the shares of Common Stock eligible for future sale . the trading markets and potential volatility of the market price of the shares of Common Stock. 8
424B1199th Page of 203TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 199th
[ALTERNATE PAGE 9] USE OF PROCEEDS The Company will not receive any cash proceeds from the issuance of the 500,000 shares of Common Stock offered hereby. Such shares are being issued directly to First Fidelity in connection with the satisfaction of the First Fidelity Loan (as defined). The proceeds from the Underwritten Offering, together with the proceeds from the Mortgage Note Offering, will be used as set forth below to: (i) pay cash to those holders of Class A Common Stock, par value $.01 per share, of Taj Holding (the "Taj Holding Class A Common Stock") electing to receive cash in the Merger; (ii) redeem the outstanding 11.35% Mortgage Bonds, Series A, due 1999 (the "Taj Bonds") of Trump Taj Mahal Funding, Inc.'s ("Taj Funding") (the "Taj Bond Redemption"), at a redemption price equal to 100% of the principal amount thereof, plus accrued interest to the date of redemption; (iii) redeem the outstanding shares of the Class B Common Stock, par value $.01 per share, of Taj Holding (the "Taj Holding Class B Common Stock"), as required in connection with the Taj Bond Redemption at the redemption price of $.50 per share; (iv) retire the outstanding 10 7/8% Mortgage Notes due 2001 (the "Plaza Notes") of Trump Plaza Funding, Inc. ("Plaza Funding"), (the "Plaza Note Purchase"); (v) satisfy the indebtedness of Taj Associates under a loan agreement with National Westminster Bank USA ("NatWest") (the "NatWest Loan"); (vi) purchase certain real property used in the operation of the Taj Mahal that is currently leased from a corporation wholly owned by Trump and satisfy certain related indebtedness owed to First Fidelity Bank, National Association (now known as First Union National Bank) ("First Fidelity") (the "First Fidelity Loan"); (vii) purchase Trump Plaza East pursuant to the purchase option (the "Trump Plaza East Purchase Option") held by Trump Plaza Associates ("Plaza Associates"), the owner and operator of Trump Plaza; (viii) pay Bankers Trust Company ("Bankers Trust") $10 million to obtain releases of liens and guarantees that Bankers Trust has in connection with certain outstanding indebtedness owed by Trump to Bankers Trust (the "Trump Indebtedness"); and (ix) pay related fees and expenses and provide for working capital and other general corporate purposes. 9
424B1200th Page of 203TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 200th
[ALTERNATE PAGE 39] USE OF PROCEEDS The Company will not receive any cash proceeds from the issuance of the 500,000 shares of Common Stock offered hereby. Such shares are being issued directly to First Fidelity in connection with the satisfaction of the First Fidelity Loan. The net proceeds to the Company from the Underwritten Offering, after payment of underwriting discounts, are estimated to be $369.3 million ($424.7 million if the Underwriters' over-allotment option is exercised in full). In connection with the Merger Transaction, the proceeds from the Underwritten Offering, together with the proceeds from the Mortgage Note Offering, will be used as set forth below. The following table sets forth the anticipated sources and uses of funds for the Merger Transaction (assuming an April 15, 1996 consummation): (DOLLARS IN MILLIONS) ANTICIPATED SOURCES OF FUNDS [Download Table] CASH SOURCES Underwritten Offering.... $ 390.6 Mortgage Note Offering... 1,200.0 -------- Total Cash Sources...... 1,590.6 -------- ANTICIPATED USES OF FUNDS [Download Table] CASH USES Redeem Taj Bonds(a)........... $ 794.4 Retire Plaza Notes............ 370.0 Satisfy NatWest Loan.......... 36.5 Exercise Trump Plaza East Purchase Option.............. 28.0 Financing Fees and Expenses... 57.3 Payment to First Fidelity..... 50.0 Payment to Bankers Trust...... 10.0 Acquisition of Taj Holding Class A Common Stock......... 31.5 Redeem Taj Holding Class B Common Stock................. 0.4 Transaction Fees and Expenses ............................. 30.0 Working Capital/General Corporate Purposes........... 182.5 -------- Total Cash Uses.............. 1,590.6 -------- [Download Table] NON-CASH SOURCES Common Stock Equivalents to be issued to Trump(b).. 40.5 Common Stock to be issued to Holders of Taj Holding Class A Common Stock................... 9.0 Common Stock to be issued to First Fidelity................. 15.6 -------- Total Non-Cash Sources......... 65.1 -------- TOTAL SOURCES................... $1,655.7 ======== [Download Table] NON-CASH USES Acquisition of Trump's direct and indirect equity interests in Taj Associates............. 40.5 Common Stock issued to Holders of Taj Holding Class A Common Stock......................... 9.0 Common Stock issued to First Fidelity...................... 15.6 -------- Total Non-Cash Uses........... 65.1 -------- TOTAL USES..................... $1,655.7 ======== --------------------- (a) Includes the Additional Amount (as defined) through April 15, 1996. See "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations." (b) Represents the value of the shares of Common Stock into which the limited partnership interests in THCR Holdings to be issued to Trump and TTMI, a corporation wholly owned by Trump, in connection with the Merger Transaction will be convertible. 39
424B1201st Page of 203TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 201st
[ALTERNATE PAGE 140] PLAN OF DISTRIBUTION The shares of Common Stock offered in the Stock Offering will be issued by the Company in a non-underwritten sale. Such shares are being issued directly to First Fidelity in connection with the satisfaction of the First Fidelity Loan. All expenses relating to the distribution of these shares will be borne by the Company. There will be no underwriting discounts and commissions with respect thereto. 140
424B1202nd Page of 203TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 202nd
[ALTERNATE PAGE 141] THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK. 141
424B1Last Page of 203TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 203rd
[ALTERNATE BACK COVER PAGE] -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- NO DEALER, SALESPERSON OR OTHER PERSON HAS BEEN AUTHORIZED TO GIVE ANY INFOR- MATION OR TO MAKE ANY REPRESENTATIONS NOT CONTAINED IN THIS PROSPECTUS AND, IF GIVEN OR MADE, SUCH INFORMATION OR REPRESENTATIONS MUST NOT BE RELIED UPON AS HAVING BEEN AUTHORIZED BY THE COMPANY. THIS PROSPECTUS DOES NOT CONSTITUTE AN OFFER TO SELL OR A SOLICITATION OF AN OFFER TO BUY THE SHARES BY ANYONE IN ANY JURISDICTION IN WHICH SUCH OFFER OR SOLICITATION IS NOT AUTHORIZED, OR IN WHICH THE PERSON MAKING THE OFFER OR SOLICITATION IS NOT QUALIFIED TO DO SO, OR TO ANY PERSON TO WHOM IT IS UNLAWFUL TO MAKE SUCH OFFER OR SOLICITATION. NEITHER THE DELIVERY OF THIS PROSPECTUS NOR ANY SALE MADE HEREUNDER SHALL, UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES, CREATE ANY IMPLICATION THAT THE INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS CORRECT AS OF ANY TIME SUBSEQUENT TO THE DATE HEREOF. ------------ TABLE OF CONTENTS [Download Table] PAGE Prospectus Summary....................................................... 3 Risk Factors............................................................. 22 Use of Proceeds.......................................................... 39 Price Range of Common Stock.............................................. 40 Dividend Policy.......................................................... 40 Capitalization........................................................... 41 Selected Historical Consolidated Financial Information................... 42 Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations........................................................... 45 Unaudited Pro Forma Financial Information................................ 56 Business................................................................. 62 Regulatory Matters....................................................... 95 Management............................................................... 108 Certain Transactions..................................................... 125 Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management........... 127 Description of Capital Stock............................................. 128 Description of the THCR Holdings Partnership Agreement................... 132 Shares Eligible for Future Sale.......................................... 137 Special Tax Considerations for Foreign Shareholders...................... 138 Plan of Distribution..................................................... 140 Legal Matters............................................................ 142 Experts.................................................................. 142 Available Information.................................................... 142 Index to Financial Statements............................................ F-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 500,000 SHARES TRUMP HOTELS & CASINO RESORTS TRUMP HOTELS & CASINO RESORTS, INC. COMMON STOCK ---------------- PROSPECTUS ---------------- APRIL 11, 1996 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dates Referenced Herein   and   Documents Incorporated by Reference

Referenced-On Page
This ‘424B1’ Filing    Date First  Last      Other Filings
12/31/35134
12/31/2386
6/12/15135
8/1/1276
12/31/057310-K,  10-K/A
6/30/057511910-Q
6/15/0583
6/12/05116
6/15/01152170
7/1/0075119
6/30/007511910-Q
6/15/0083153
6/12/00119
6/7/0033
12/31/998012310-K405,  11-K
11/15/9917188
11/13/9987
9/14/9971
6/30/99339510-Q
6/12/99119
5/15/9985187
3/31/993319010-K,  10-Q
7/9/98118
6/30/981717410-Q,  11-K
6/15/9884170
6/12/98119
6/12/977197
12/31/961715510-K405
9/30/967610-Q,  DEF 14A,  PREM14A
9/25/9633117
7/15/9674PREM14A
7/1/9678174
6/28/9634103
4/17/961178-K
4/15/9610200
Filed on:4/12/96
4/11/961203
4/9/962898
4/5/964053
4/1/961278-A12B/A
3/29/967490
3/27/966011910-K
2/28/96113
2/21/96144162
2/16/965179
1/31/96171928-K
1/26/9689
1/8/96171928-K
12/31/951119210-K
12/15/95153
12/13/9596
11/17/953294
10/31/95113
10/10/95103
9/30/95120
9/29/9573
9/20/9576
9/1/9580122
7/25/9573
7/1/9575119
6/30/9573
6/22/9533190
6/20/9573
6/12/9511176
6/7/9540
6/6/95141
5/27/9573
5/18/9552100
5/17/9596
5/15/9582186
5/12/9573
5/10/9573
5/1/9589
4/24/9589
4/21/9589
4/18/9589
4/17/9589
3/31/95121
3/29/9589
3/28/9513149
3/6/95121
2/21/95110
1/25/9552
1/10/9588
1/1/9511175
12/31/9411192
12/20/9491
12/9/9474102
11/14/9491
9/30/94121
9/19/94110
9/1/9487
8/30/94121
6/30/94120
6/27/94121
6/16/94121
6/15/944849
5/15/9482186
5/8/94120
4/11/94109
4/5/94107
4/2/9491
3/31/9446
1/5/94120121
12/31/9311191
12/15/93153170
10/13/9390
7/1/93101
6/25/93152172
6/24/93121174
5/15/9382186
4/30/9331
3/31/9346
3/19/93125175
2/1/93119125
1/24/9353
1/1/93169182
12/31/9213186
12/11/92110113
11/2/92110113
9/30/92120
5/29/9224167
5/15/9282187
5/5/92110113
4/30/92110113
4/2/9291
3/9/92110112
 List all Filings 
Top
Filing Submission 0000950130-96-001226   –   Alternative Formats (Word / Rich Text, HTML, Plain Text, et al.)

Copyright © 2024 Fran Finnegan & Company LLC – All Rights Reserved.
AboutPrivacyRedactionsHelp — Sun., Apr. 28, 3:24:17.2am ET