SEC Info  
    Home      Search      My Interests      Help      Sign In      Please Sign In

Zoll Medical Corp – ‘424B4’ on 2/23/00

On:  Wednesday, 2/23/00   ·   Accession #:  950135-0-1023   ·   File #:  333-94793

Find Words in Filings emoji
 
  in    Show  and   Hints

  As Of                Filer                Filing    For·On·As Docs:Size              Issuer               Agent

 2/23/00  Zoll Medical Corp                 424B4                  1:204K                                   Bowne of Boston/FA

Prospectus   —   Rule 424(b)(4)
Filing Table of Contents

Document/Exhibit                   Description                      Pages   Size 

 1: 424B4       Zoll Medical Corporation                              67    316K 


Document Table of Contents

Page (sequential) | (alphabetic) Top
 
11st Page   -   Filing Submission
5Prospectus Summary
6The Offering
8Risk Factors
17Information Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
19Use of Proceeds
"Market Price of Common Stock
"Dividend Policy
20Capitalization
"Dilution
21Selected Financial Data
22Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
25Business
36Research and development
39Management
41Principal Stockholders
42Relationships and Related Party Transactions
43Underwriting
45Legal Matters
"Experts
"Where You Can Find More Information
47Consolidated Financial Statements
48Report of Independent Auditors
49Consolidated Balance Sheets
50Consolidated Income Statements
51Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity
52Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
53Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
"Cash and cash equivalents
54Earnings per Share
424B41st Page of 67TOCTopPreviousNextBottomJust 1st
 

FILED PURSUANT TO RULE 424(b)(4) REGISTRATION NO. 333-94793 PROSPECTUS 1,500,000 SHARES [ZOLL LOGO] ZOLL MEDICAL CORPORATION COMMON STOCK $41.75 PER SHARE ------------------ We are selling 1,500,000 shares of our common stock. We have granted the underwriters a 30-day option to purchase up to an additional 225,000 shares to cover over-allotments, if any. Our common stock is quoted on the Nasdaq National Market under the symbol "ZOLL". The last reported sale price of our common stock on the Nasdaq National Market on February 22, 2000 was $41.52 per share. ------------------ INVESTING IN OUR COMMON STOCK INVOLVES CERTAIN RISKS. SEE "RISK FACTORS" BEGINNING ON PAGE 4. Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state securities commission has approved or disapproved of these securities or determined if this prospectus is truthful or complete. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense. ------------------ [Download Table] PER SHARE TOTAL --------- ----------- Public Offering Price $41.75 $62,625,000 Underwriting Discount $ 2.40 $ 3,600,938 Proceeds to Zoll (before expenses) $39.35 $59,024,062 The underwriters expect to deliver the shares to purchasers on or about February 28, 2000. ------------------ SALOMON SMITH BARNEY U.S. BANCORP PIPER JAFFRAY ADAMS, HARKNESS & HILL, INC. February 22, 2000
424B42nd Page of 67TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 2nd
[INSIDE FRONT COVER GRAPHIC] Included on the inside front cover page of the printed prospectus is a full page graphic containing a picture of our M Series defibrillator and a vertical collage on the left side of the page depicting numerous images relating to our products. The graphic contains the following text: KEY ADVANTAGES OF THE M SERIES DEFIBRILLATORS - Portability (lightest & smallest full-featured external defibrillator made) - Ease-of-use with simple controls - Vivid screen display - Expandable monitoring capabilities and data management features - Superior biphasic defibrillation waveform Zoll's newest line of external defibrillators are designed to effectively treat sudden cardiac arrest, a leading cause of death in the United States.
424B43rd Page of 67TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 3rd
YOU SHOULD RELY ONLY ON THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS PROSPECTUS. WE HAVE NOT AUTHORIZED ANYONE TO PROVIDE YOU WITH DIFFERENT INFORMATION. WE ARE NOT MAKING AN OFFER OF THESE SECURITIES IN ANY STATE WHERE THE OFFER IS NOT PERMITTED. YOU SHOULD NOT ASSUME THAT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED BY THIS PROSPECTUS IS ACCURATE AS OF ANY DATE OTHER THAN THE DATE ON THE FRONT OF THIS PROSPECTUS. ------------------------ TABLE OF CONTENTS [Download Table] PAGE ---- Prospectus Summary.......................................... 1 Risk Factors................................................ 4 Information Regarding Forward-Looking Statements............ 13 Use of Proceeds............................................. 15 Market Price of Common Stock................................ 15 Dividend Policy............................................. 15 Capitalization.............................................. 16 Dilution.................................................... 16 Selected Financial Data..................................... 17 Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations................................. 18 Business.................................................... 21 Management.................................................. 35 Principal Stockholders...................................... 37 Relationships and Related Party Transactions................ 38 Underwriting................................................ 39 Legal Matters............................................... 41 Experts..................................................... 41 Where You Can Find More Information......................... 41 Consolidated Financial Statements........................... F-1 i
424B44th Page of 67TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 4th
[THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]
424B45th Page of 67TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 5th
PROSPECTUS SUMMARY This summary highlights information contained elsewhere in this prospectus. You should read this entire prospectus carefully, including the "Risk Factors" section. In addition, we incorporate by reference important business and financial information in this prospectus. OUR COMPANY We design, manufacture and market an integrated line of proprietary, noninvasive cardiac resuscitation devices, our external defibrillators/pacemakers, as well as disposable electrodes and emergency medical system software data management solutions. Our cardiac resuscitation products are designed to improve survival rates from sudden cardiac arrest, a leading cause of death in the United States. Sudden cardiac arrest claims over 250,000 victims each year in the United States alone. For victims of sudden cardiac arrest, time is the most critical element for survival. According to the American Heart Association, more than 95% of sudden cardiac arrest victims die, in many cases because life saving defibrillators arrive on the scene too late, if at all. We believe that the importance of immediate treatment, coupled with an aging population, implies a long-term growth opportunity in this market. We estimate that the annual worldwide market for external defibrillator products was $525 million in 1999. We divide the market for cardiac resuscitation equipment into three principal markets: the hospital, pre-hospital and public access defibrillation markets. We currently sell our devices in the hospital and pre-hospital markets and plan to introduce a device for the public access defibrillation market within the next 12 to 24 months. We believe we are the second largest company in the world in external defibrillator product sales. From fiscal 1998 to fiscal 1999, our revenues increased 37%, making us the fastest growing worldwide external defibrillator company. We are the only external defibrillator manufacturer whose customers include all of the top 12 cardiac care hospitals, as ranked by the U.S. News and World Report in July 1999. In addition, our newest line of defibrillators has recently been selected as the standard device in the White House. A major element of our business strategy is to capitalize on the success of the M Series, our most recent line of defibrillators. In addition, we will promote the use of our proprietary biphasic waveform in order to increase our market share in both the domestic and international markets for cardiac resuscitation products. OUR M SERIES DEFIBRILLATORS In September 1998, we shipped the first M Series defibrillators equipped with a conventional monophasic waveform. The M Series is a new line of defibrillators for both the hospital and pre-hospital markets. To date, the M Series defibrillator is our best selling device and represented more than 80% of our capital equipment device sales in the first quarter of fiscal 2000. We believe that the clinical superiority of our biphasic waveform combined with the product advantages listed below offer compelling reasons for customers to choose our M Series defibrillators. We believe that our M Series defibrillators offer the following competitive advantages: - portability; - ease-of-use with simple controls; and - vivid screen display. In addition, the M Series is an expandable platform that allows customers to add features to tailor the devices to their specific needs. OUR PROPRIETARY BIPHASIC WAVEFORM We recently began shipping M Series defibrillators equipped with our proprietary biphasic waveform. Our biphasic waveform has demonstrated higher clinical efficacy than conventional monophasic waveforms. 1
424B46th Page of 67TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 6th
We have received clearance from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration to label our M Series defibrillators equipped with our biphasic waveform as being clinically superior to defibrillators with a monophasic waveform for particular uses. We are the only company to receive a claim of superiority on its biphasic waveform. We therefore believe that our proprietary biphasic waveform is superior to the biphasic waveform utilized by any of our competitors. We believe the clinical superiority of our biphasic waveform combined with product advantages offer compelling reasons for customers to choose our products. OUR MARKET OPPORTUNITIES While we plan to increase our share in both the domestic and international markets primarily by promoting our M Series defibrillators and biphasic waveform, we also seek additional future growth opportunities. We intend to enter the public access defibrillation market with a low-cost automated external defibrillator. This device will bring cardiac resuscitation capabilities to the large and relatively unpenetrated public access defibrillation market. In addition, we plan to integrate the pieces of our data management solution into a single system to capitalize on the significant growth opportunities that we believe exist in the emergency medical system data management market. We were incorporated in Massachusetts in 1980. Our executive offices are located at 32 Second Avenue in Burlington, Massachusetts 01803, and our telephone number is (781) 229-0020. THE OFFERING Common stock offered.................... 1,500,000 shares Common stock to be outstanding after the offering................................ 8,343,809 shares Use of proceeds......................... To fund business development, such as research and development and sales and marketing, to fund future acquisitions, particularly in current and related lines of business, to provide working capital and for general corporate purposes. Unless we specifically state otherwise, the information in this prospectus does not take into account the issuance of up to 225,000 shares of common stock which the underwriters have the option to purchase solely to cover over-allotments. If the underwriters exercise their over-allotment option in full, 8,568,809 shares of common stock will be outstanding after the offering. The number of shares of common stock to be outstanding immediately after the offering is based upon shares outstanding as of January 1, 2000 and does not take into account 1,063,918 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of options outstanding at a weighted average exercise price of $13.84 per share and 115,075 shares reserved under our existing stock option plans. 2
424B47th Page of 67TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 7th
SUMMARY FINANCIAL DATA [Enlarge/Download Table] FISCAL YEARS ENDED THREE MONTHS ENDED -------------------------------------------------------- ------------------- SEPT. 30, SEPT. 28, SEPT. 27, SEPT. 26, OCT. 2, JAN. 2, JAN. 1, 1995 1996 1997(1) 1998 1999 1999 2000 --------- --------- --------- --------- -------- -------- -------- (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA) (UNAUDITED) INCOME STATEMENT DATA: Net sales.................. $ 45,884 $ 55,700 $ 57,833 $ 57,520 $ 78,682 $ 16,056 $ 24,435 Cost of goods sold......... 20,421 24,545 25,372 24,268 32,486 6,532 10,843 -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- Gross profit............... 25,463 31,155 32,461 33,252 46,196 9,524 13,592 Expenses: Selling and marketing.... 15,575 16,773 18,484 20,152 24,364 5,415 7,674 General and administrative........ 4,313 4,809 6,749 6,239 7,422 1,630 1,952 Research and development........... 4,360 4,464 6,430 6,583 6,916 1,603 1,731 -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- Total expenses........ 24,248 26,046 31,663 32,974 38,702 8,648 11,357 -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- Income from operations..... 1,215 5,109 798 278 7,494 876 2,235 Net investment income (expense)................ 243 278 355 413 (45) 66 (70) -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- Income before income taxes.................... 1,458 5,387 1,153 691 7,449 942 2,165 Provision for income taxes.................... 496 1,758 266 18 2,010 240 801 -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- Net income................. $ 962 $ 3,629 $ 887 $ 673 $ 5,439 $ 702 $ 1,364 ======== ======== ======== ======== ======== ======== ======== Basic earnings per share... $ 0.15 $ 0.55 $ 0.13 $ 0.10 $ 0.82 $ 0.11 $ 0.20 ======== ======== ======== ======== ======== ======== ======== Weighted average common shares outstanding.............. 6,519 6,562 6,602 6,602 6,656 6,628 6,794 Diluted earnings per share.................... $ 0.15 $ 0.55 $ 0.13 $ 0.10 $ 0.79 $ 0.10 $ 0.19 ======== ======== ======== ======== ======== ======== ======== Weighted average common and equivalent shares outstanding.............. 6,613 6,635 6,650 6,647 6,893 6,730 7,196 [Download Table] Pro forma information(2): Historical income before income taxes..................... $ 7,449 $ 942 Pro forma incremental operating costs..................... 272 65 -------- -------- Pro forma income before income taxes...................... 7,177 877 Pro forma provision for income taxes...................... 2,402 300 -------- -------- Pro forma net income...................................... $ 4,775 $ 577 ======== ======== Pro forma diluted earnings per share...................... $ 0.69 $ 0.09 ======== ======== [Enlarge/Download Table] JANUARY 1, 2000 ------------------------ ACTUAL AS ADJUSTED(3) ------- -------------- (UNAUDITED) (IN THOUSANDS) BALANCE SHEET DATA: Cash and cash equivalents................................... $ 1,284 $ 59,708 Working capital............................................. 28,440 86,864 Total assets................................................ 63,020 121,444 Total long-term debt, excluding current portion............. 2,029 2,029 Total stockholders' equity.................................. 43,660 102,084 --------------- (1) For the year ended September 27, 1997, excluding one-time charges totaling $2,300, net income would have been $2,405 and basic and diluted earnings per share would have been $0.36. (2) Pro forma information reflects the effect of (i) incremental operating costs expected to be incurred by the Company as a result of the Pinpoint merger and (ii) the provision for corporate income taxes on the previously untaxed Subchapter S corporation earnings of Pinpoint. See Note B to the consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus. (3) The As Adjusted information gives effect to this offering and assumes no exercise of the underwriters' over-allotment option. 3
424B48th Page of 67TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 8th
RISK FACTORS An investment in our common stock involves significant risks. You should carefully consider the following risks before you decide to buy our common stock. IF WE FAIL TO COMPETE SUCCESSFULLY IN THE FUTURE AGAINST EXISTING OR POTENTIAL COMPETITORS, OUR OPERATING RESULTS MAY BE ADVERSELY AFFECTED Our principal global competitors with respect to our entire cardiac resuscitation equipment product line are Physio-Control Corporation and Agilent Technologies, Inc. Physio-Control is a subsidiary of Medtronic, Inc., a leading medical technology company, and Agilent, which now includes Heartstream, Inc., was formerly part of Hewlett-Packard Company. Physio-Control has been the market leader in the defibrillator industry for over twenty years and has a broader line of product offerings and accessories than we do. As a result of Physio-Control's dominant position in this industry, many potential customers have relationships with Physio-Control that could make it difficult for us to continue to penetrate the markets for our products. In addition, Physio-Control, its parent and Agilent and other competitors each have significantly greater resources than we do. Accordingly, Physio-Control, Agilent and other competitors could substantially increase the resources they devote to the development and marketing of products that are competitive with ours. Moreover, these and other competitors may develop and successfully commercialize medical devices that directly or indirectly accomplish what our products are designed to accomplish in a superior and/or less expensive manner. For example, we expect our competitors to develop and sell devices in the future that will compete directly with our M Series product line and our biphasic waveform technology. As a consequence, such competing medical devices may render our products obsolete. In addition to external defibrillation and external pacing with cardiac resuscitation equipment, it is possible that other alternative therapeutic approaches to the treatment of sudden cardiac arrest may be developed. These alternative therapies or approaches, including pharmaceutical or other alternatives, could prove to be superior to our products. Moreover, there is significant competition in the business of developing and marketing software for data collection, billing and data management in the emergency medical system market. Our principal competitors in this business include PAD Systems, Healthware Technologies, Inc., Tritech Software Systems, Inc., Sweet Computer Services, Inc., RAM Software Systems, Inc., Intergraph Corporation and AmbPac, Inc., some of which have greater financial, technical, research and development and marketing resources than we do. In addition, because the barriers to entry in this business are relatively low, additional competitors may easily enter this market in the future. It is possible that systems developed by competitors could be superior to our data management system. Consequently, our ability to sell our data management system could be materially impacted and our financial results could be materially and adversely affected. OUR OPERATING RESULTS ARE LIKELY TO FLUCTUATE WHICH COULD CAUSE OUR STOCK PRICE TO BE VOLATILE, AND THE ANTICIPATION OF A VOLATILE STOCK PRICE CAN CAUSE GREATER VOLATILITY Our quarterly and annual operating results have fluctuated and may continue to fluctuate. Various factors have and may continue to affect our operating results, including: - high demand for our products which could disrupt our normal factory utilization and cause shipments to occur in uneven patterns; - variations in product orders; - timing of new product introductions; - changes in distribution channels; - actions taken by our competitors such as the introduction of new products or the offering of sales incentives; 4
424B49th Page of 67TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 9th
- the ability of our sales force to effectively market our products; - supply interruptions from our single source vendors; - regulatory actions, including actions taken by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration; and - delays in obtaining domestic or foreign regulatory approvals. Based on these factors, period to period comparisons should not be relied upon as indications of future performance. In addition, in anticipation of less successful quarterly results, parties may take short positions in our stock. The actions of parties shorting our stock might cause even more volatility in our stock price. The volatility of our stock may cause the value of a stockholder's investment to decline rapidly. WE MAY BE REQUIRED TO IMPLEMENT A COSTLY PRODUCT RECALL In the event that any of our products proves to be defective, we can voluntarily recall, or the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, the FDA, could require us to redesign or implement a recall of, any of our products. We and our competitors have voluntarily recalled products in the past, and based on this experience, we believe that future recalls could result in significant costs to us and significant adverse publicity which could harm our ability to market our products in the future. Though it is not possible to quantify the economic impact of a recall, it could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. WE CAN BE SUED FOR PRODUCING DEFECTIVE PRODUCTS AND WE MAY BE REQUIRED TO PAY SIGNIFICANT AMOUNTS TO THOSE HARMED IF WE ARE FOUND LIABLE, AND OUR BUSINESS COULD SUFFER FROM ADVERSE PUBLICITY The manufacture and sale of medical products such as ours entail significant risk of product liability claims. Our quality control standards comply with FDA requirements and we believe that the amount of product liability insurance we maintain is adequate based on past product liability claims in our industry. We cannot assure you, however, that the amount of such insurance will be sufficient to satisfy claims made against us in the future or that we will be able to maintain insurance in the future at satisfactory rates or in adequate amounts. Product liability claims could result in significant costs or litigation. In addition, a successful claim brought against us in excess of our available insurance coverage or any claim that results in significant adverse publicity against us could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. OUR DEPENDENCE ON SOLE AND SINGLE SOURCE SUPPLIERS EXPOSES US TO SUPPLY INTERRUPTIONS THAT COULD RESULT IN PRODUCT DELIVERY DELAYS AND SUBSTANTIAL COSTS TO REDESIGN OUR PRODUCTS Although we use many standard parts and components for our products, some key components are purchased from sole or single source vendors for which alternative sources are not currently readily available. For example, we currently purchase proprietary components, including capacitors, screens, gate arrays and integrated circuits, for which there are no direct substitutes. Our inability to obtain sufficient quantities of these components may result in future delays or reductions in product shipments which could cause a fluctuation in our results of operations. These components could be replaced with alternatives from other suppliers, which could involve a redesign of our products. Such redesign could involve considerable time and expense. For example, in 1999, one of our vendors was unable to provide sufficient quantities of screens that were used in our M Series products. To keep up with the demand for our products, we sought alternative screens from another supplier and redesigned our product accordingly. Redesigning our products resulted in additional costs and delays in the shipment of some of our products. Although we believe we have solved this supply problem, we cannot assure you that we will not have similar supply problems in the future. 5
424B410th Page of 67TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 10th
OUR RELIANCE ON INDEPENDENT MANUFACTURERS CREATES SEVERAL RISKS THAT COULD RESULT IN PRODUCT DELIVERY DELAYS, INCREASED COSTS AND OTHER ADVERSE EFFECTS ON OUR BUSINESS We currently engage a small number of independent manufacturers to manufacture several components for our products, including circuit boards, molded plastic components, cables and high voltage assemblies. Our reliance on these independent manufacturers involves a number of risks, including the potential for inadequate capacity, unavailability of, or interruptions in access to, process technologies, and reduced control over delivery schedules, manufacturing yields and costs. If our manufacturers are unable or unwilling to continue manufacturing our components in required volumes, we will have to transfer manufacturing to acceptable alternative manufacturers whom we have identified, which could result in significant interruptions of supply. Moreover, the manufacture of these components is complex, and our reliance on the suppliers of these components exposes us to potential production difficulties and quality variations, which could negatively impact the cost and timely delivery of our products. Accordingly, any significant interruption in the supply, or degradation in the quality, of any component would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. FAILURE TO PRODUCE NEW PRODUCTS OR OBTAIN MARKET ACCEPTANCE FOR OUR NEW PRODUCTS IN A TIMELY MANNER COULD HARM OUR BUSINESS Because substantially all of our revenue comes from the sale of cardiac resuscitation devices and related products, our financial performance will depend upon market acceptance of, and our ability to deliver and support, new products such as upgrades to the M Series defibrillator, a product for the public access defibrillation market and an integrated product for the emergency medical system data management market. We cannot assure you that we will be able to produce viable products in the time frames we currently estimate. Factors which could cause delay in these schedules or even cancellation of our projects to produce and market these new products include research and development delays, the actions of our competitors producing competing products and the actions of other parties who may provide alternative therapies or solutions which could reduce or eliminate the markets for pending products. The degree of market acceptance of any of our products will depend on a number of factors, including: - our ability to develop and introduce new products in the time frames we currently estimate; - our ability to successfully implement new product technologies; - the market's readiness to accept new products such as our M Series defibrillators and data management products; - the standardization of an automated platform for data management systems; - having adequate financial and technical resources for future product development and promotion; - the efficacy of our products; and - the prices of our products compared to the prices of our competitors' products. If our new products do not achieve market acceptance, our financial performance will be adversely affected. WE MAY NOT BE ABLE TO OBTAIN APPROPRIATE REGULATORY APPROVALS FOR OUR NEW PRODUCTS The manufacture and sale of our products are subject to regulation by numerous governmental authorities, principally the FDA and corresponding state and foreign agencies. The FDA administers the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act, as amended, and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder. Some of our products have been classified by the FDA as Class II devices and others, such as our automated external defibrillators, have been classified as Class III devices. All of these devices must 6
424B411th Page of 67TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 11th
secure either a 510(k) pre-market notification clearance or an approved pre-market approval application before they can be introduced into the U.S. market. The process of obtaining 510(k) clearance typically takes several months and may involve the submission of limited clinical data supporting assertions that the product is substantially equivalent to another medical device on the market prior to 1976. The pre-market approval process typically requires substantially more time than does 510(k) clearance and requires the submission of significant quantities of clinical data and supporting information. Delays in obtaining either 510(k), or if necessary, pre-market approval clearance could have an adverse effect on the introduction of future products. Moreover, approvals, if granted, may limit the uses for which a product may be marketed, which could reduce or eliminate the commercial benefit of manufacturing any such product. We are also subject to regulation in each of the foreign countries in which we sell products. Many of the regulations applicable to our products in such countries are similar to those of the FDA. However, the national health or social security organizations of certain countries require our products to be qualified before they can be marketed in those countries. We cannot assure you that such clearances will be obtained. IF WE FAIL TO COMPLY WITH APPLICABLE REGULATORY LAWS AND REGULATIONS, THE FDA COULD EXERCISE ANY OF ITS REGULATORY POWERS THAT COULD HAVE A MATERIAL ADVERSE EFFECT ON OUR BUSINESS Every company that manufactures or assembles medical devices is required to register with the FDA and to adhere to certain good manufacturing practices which regulate the manufacture of medical devices and prescribe record keeping procedures and provide for the routine inspection of facilities for compliance with such regulations. The FDA also has broad regulatory powers in the areas of clinical testing, marketing and advertising of medical devices. To ensure that manufacturers adhere to good manufacturing practices, medical device manufacturers are routinely subject to periodic inspections by the FDA. If the FDA believes that a company may not be operating in compliance with applicable laws and regulations, it could take any of the following actions: - place the company under observation and reinspect the facilities; - issue a warning letter apprising of violative conduct; - detain or seize products; - mandate a recall; - enjoin future violations; and - assess civil and criminal penalties against the company, its officers or its employees. We, like most of our U.S. competitors, have received warning letters from the FDA in the past, and may receive warning letters in the future. We have always complied with the warning letters we have received. However, our failure to comply with FDA regulations could result in sanctions being imposed on us, including restrictions on the marketing or recall of our products. These sanctions could have a material adverse effect on our business. WE ARE DEPENDENT UPON LICENSED AND PURCHASED TECHNOLOGY FOR UPGRADEABLE FEATURES IN OUR PRODUCTS, AND WE MAY NOT BE ABLE TO RENEW THESE LICENSES OR PURCHASE AGREEMENTS IN THE FUTURE We license and purchase technology from third parties for upgradeable features in our products, including 12 lead analysis program and pulse oximetry technologies. We anticipate that we will need to license and purchase additional technology to remain competitive. We may not be able to renew our existing licenses and purchase agreements or to license and purchase other technologies on commercially reasonable terms or at all. If we are unable to renew our existing licenses and purchase agreements or we are unable to license or purchase new technologies, we may not be able to offer competitive products. 7
424B412th Page of 67TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 12th
FUTURE CHANGES IN APPLICABLE LAWS AND REGULATIONS COULD HAVE AN ADVERSE EFFECT ON OUR BUSINESS Although we are not aware of any pending changes in applicable laws and regulations, we cannot assure you that federal, state or foreign governments will not change existing laws or regulations or adopt new laws or regulations that regulate our industry. Changes in or adoption of new laws or regulations could result in the following consequences that would have an adverse effect on our business: - regulatory clearance previously received for our products could be revoked; - costs of compliance could increase; or - we may be unable to comply with such laws and regulations so that we would be unable to sell our products. CHANGES IN THE HEALTH CARE INDUSTRY MAY REQUIRE US TO DECREASE THE SELLING PRICE FOR OUR PRODUCTS OR COULD RESULT IN A REDUCTION IN THE SIZE OF THE MARKET FOR OUR PRODUCTS, EACH OF WHICH COULD HAVE A NEGATIVE IMPACT ON OUR FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE Trends toward managed care, health care cost containment, and other changes in government and private sector initiatives in the United States and other countries in which we do business are placing increased emphasis on the delivery of more cost-effective medical therapies which could adversely affect the sale and/or the prices of our products. For example: - major third-party payors of hospital services, including Medicare, Medicaid and private health care insurers, have substantially revised their payment methodologies during the last few years which has resulted in stricter standards for reimbursement of hospital charges for certain medical procedures; - Medicare, Medicaid and private health care insurer cutbacks could create downward price pressure in the cardiac resuscitation pre-hospital market; - proposals were adopted recently that will change the reimbursement procedures for the capital expenditure portion of the cost of providing care to Medicare patients; - numerous legislative proposals have been considered that would result in major reforms in the U.S. health care system that could have an adverse effect on our business; - there has been a consolidation among health care facilities and purchasers of medical devices in the United States who prefer to limit the number of suppliers from whom they purchase medical products, and these entities may decide to stop purchasing our products or demand discounts on our prices; - there is economic pressure to contain health care costs in international markets; - there are proposed and existing laws and regulations in domestic and international markets regulating pricing and profitability of companies in the health care industry; and - there have been recent initiatives by third party payors to challenge the prices charged for medical products which could affect our ability to sell products on a competitive basis. Both the pressure to reduce prices for our products in response to these trends and the decrease in the size of the market as a result of these trends could adversely affect our levels of revenues and profitability of sales, which could have a material adverse effect on our business. UNCERTAIN CUSTOMER DECISION PROCESSES MAY RESULT IN LONG SALES CYCLES WHICH COULD RESULT IN UNPREDICTABLE FLUCTUATIONS IN REVENUES AND DELAY THE REPLACEMENT OF CARDIAC RESUSCITATION DEVICES Many of the customers in the pre-hospital market consist of municipal fire and emergency medical systems departments. As a result, there are numerous decision-makers and governmental procedures in the decision-making process. In addition, decisions at hospitals concerning the purchase of new medical devices are sometimes made on a department-by-department basis. Accordingly, we believe the purchasing 8
424B413th Page of 67TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 13th
decisions of many of our customers may be characterized by long decision-making processes, which have resulted in and may continue to result in long sales cycles for our products. For example, the sales cycles for cardiac resuscitation products typically have been between six to nine months, although some sales efforts have taken as long as two years. OUR INTERNATIONAL SALES EXPOSE OUR BUSINESS TO A VARIETY OF RISKS THAT COULD RESULT IN SIGNIFICANT FLUCTUATIONS IN OUR RESULTS OF OPERATIONS Approximately 20% of our sales in fiscal 1999 were made to foreign purchasers, particularly in countries located in Europe and Asia, and we plan to increase the sale of our products to foreign purchasers in the future. As a result, a significant portion of our sales is and will continue to be subject to the risks of international business, including: - fluctuations in foreign currencies; - trade disputes; - changes in regulatory requirements, tariffs and other barriers; - the possibility of quotas, duties, taxes or other changes or restrictions upon the importation or exportation of the products being implemented by the United States or these foreign countries; - timing and availability of import/export licenses; - political and economic instability; - difficulties in accounts receivable collections; - difficulties in managing laws; - increased tax exposure if our revenues in foreign countries are subject to taxation by more than one jurisdiction; - accepting customer purchase orders governed by foreign laws which may differ significantly from U.S. laws and limit our ability to enforce our rights under such agreements and to collect damages, if awarded; and - the general economies of these countries in which we transact business. As international sales become a larger portion of our total sales, these risks could create significant fluctuations in our results of operations. In addition, these risks could affect our ability to resell trade-in products to domestic distributors, who in turn often resell the trade-in products in international markets. Our inability to sell trade-in products might require us to offer lower trade-in values, which might impact our ability to sell new products to customers desiring to trade in older models and then purchase newer products. FLUCTUATIONS IN CURRENCY EXCHANGE RATES MAY ADVERSELY AFFECT OUR INTERNATIONAL SALES Our revenue from international operations can be denominated in or significantly influenced by the currency and general economic climate of the country in which we make sales. A decrease in the value of such foreign currencies relative to the U.S. dollar could result in downward price pressure for our products or losses from currency exchange rate fluctuations. As we continue to expand our international operations, downward price pressure and exposure to gains and losses on foreign currency transactions may increase. We may choose to limit such exposure by entering into forward-foreign exchange contracts or engaging in similar hedging strategies. We cannot assure you that any currency exchange strategy would be successful in avoiding losses due to exchange rate fluctuations, or that the failure to manage currency risks effectively would not have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, cash flows, and results of operations. 9
424B414th Page of 67TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 14th
WE MAY FAIL TO ADEQUATELY PROTECT OR ENFORCE OUR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS OR SECURE RIGHTS TO THIRD PARTY PATENTS, AND OUR COMPETITORS CAN USE SOME OF OUR PREVIOUSLY PROPRIETARY TECHNOLOGY Our success will depend in part on our ability to obtain and maintain patent protection for our products, methods, processes and other technologies, to preserve our trade secrets and to operate without infringing the proprietary rights of third parties. To date, we have been issued 21 U.S. patents for our various inventions and technologies. Additional patent applications have been filed with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office and are currently pending. The patents that have been granted to us are for a definitive period of time and will expire. We have filed certain corresponding foreign patent applications and intend to file additional foreign and U.S. patent applications as appropriate. We cannot assure you as to: - the degree and range of protection any patents will afford against competitors with similar products; - if and when patents will be issued; - whether or not others will obtain patents claiming aspects similar to those covered by our patent applications; - whether or not competitors will use information contained in our expired patents, such as our U.S. pacing system patent which will expire in 2000; - whether or not others will design around our patents or obtain access to our know-how; or - the extent to which we will be successful in avoiding any patents granted to others. For example, we have patents and pending patent applications for our proprietary biphasic technology. Our competitors could develop biphasic technology that has comparable or superior clinical efficacy to our biphasic technology if our patents do not adequately protect our technology, our competitors are able to obtain patents claiming aspects similar to our biphasic technology or our competitors can design around our patents. If certain patents issued to others are upheld or if certain patent applications filed by others issue and are upheld, we may be: - required to obtain licenses or redesign our products or processes to avoid infringement; - prevented from practicing the subject matter claimed in those patents; or - required to pay damages. Litigation or administrative proceedings, including interference proceedings before the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, related to intellectual property rights could be brought against us or be initiated by us. Any judgment adverse to us in any litigation or other proceeding arising in connection with a patent or patent application could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. In addition, the costs of any such proceeding may be substantial whether or not we are successful. Our success is also dependent upon the skills, knowledge and experience, none of which is patentable, of our scientific and technical personnel. To help protect our rights, we require all employees, consultants and advisors to enter into confidentiality agreements which prohibit the disclosure of confidential information to anyone outside of our company and require disclosure and assignment to us of their ideas, developments, discoveries and inventions. We cannot assure you, however, that these agreements will provide adequate protection for our trade secrets, know-how or other proprietary information in the event of any unauthorized use or disclosure of the lawful development by others of such information. 10
424B415th Page of 67TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 15th
RELIANCE ON OVERSEAS VENDORS FOR SOME OF THE COMPONENTS FOR OUR PRODUCTS EXPOSES US TO INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS RISKS WHICH COULD HAVE AN ADVERSE EFFECT ON OUR BUSINESS Some of the components we use in our products are acquired from foreign manufacturers, particularly countries located in Europe and Asia. As a result, a significant portion of our purchases of components is subject to the risks of international business. The failure to obtain these components as a result of any of these risks can result in significant delivery delays of our products which could have an adverse effect on our business. WE RELY HEAVILY ON SEVERAL EMPLOYEES WHO MAY LEAVE, AND TIGHT LABOR MARKETS MAY MAKE IT DIFFICULT TO RECRUIT EMPLOYEES Our future operating results will depend in part upon the contributions of the persons who will serve in senior management positions and the continued contributions of key technical personnel, some of whom would be difficult to replace. In addition, our future success will depend in part upon our ability to attract and retain highly qualified personnel, particularly product design engineers. Increasingly tight labor markets could make it more difficult and/or expensive to recruit and retain employees in a cost effective manner. There can be no assurance that such key personnel will remain in our employment or that we will be successful in hiring qualified personnel. Any loss of key personnel or the inability to hire or retain qualified personnel could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. WE MAY USE A PORTION OF THE PROCEEDS OF THIS OFFERING TO ACQUIRE OTHER BUSINESSES, AND WE MAY HAVE DIFFICULTY INTEGRATING THESE BUSINESSES OR GENERATING AN ACCEPTABLE RETURN FROM ACQUISITIONS We may attempt to acquire or make strategic investments in businesses and other assets. Such acquisitions will involve risks, including: - the inability to achieve the strategic and operating goals of the acquisition; - the inability to raise the required capital to fund the acquisition; - difficulty in assimilating the acquired operations and personnel; - disruption of our ongoing business; and - inability to successfully incorporate acquired technology into our existing product lines and maintain uniform standards, controls, procedures, and policies. We may not successfully overcome problems encountered in connection with potential acquisitions. In addition, an acquisition could materially impair our operating results by causing us to incur debt or requiring us to amortize acquisition expenses and acquired assets. PROVISIONS IN OUR CHARTER DOCUMENTS, OUR SHAREHOLDER RIGHTS AGREEMENT AND STATE LAW MAY MAKE IT HARDER FOR OTHERS TO OBTAIN CONTROL OF ZOLL EVEN THOUGH SOME STOCKHOLDERS MIGHT CONSIDER SUCH A DEVELOPMENT TO BE FAVORABLE Our board of directors has the authority to issue up to 1,000,000 shares of undesignated preferred stock and to determine the rights, preferences, privileges and restrictions of such shares without further vote or action by our stockholders. The rights of the holders of common stock will be subject to, and may be adversely affected by, the rights of the holders of any preferred stock that may be issued in the future. The issuance of preferred stock could have the effect of making it more difficult for third parties to acquire a majority of our outstanding voting stock. In addition, our restated articles of organization provide for staggered terms for the members of the board of directors which could delay or impede the removal of incumbent directors and could make a merger, tender offer or proxy contest involving the Company more difficult. Our restated articles of 11
424B416th Page of 67TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 16th
organization, restated by-laws and applicable Massachusetts law also impose various procedural and other requirements that could delay or make a merger, tender offer or proxy contest involving us more difficult. In addition, we have implemented a so-called poison pill by adopting our shareholders rights agreement. This poison pill significantly increases the costs that would be incurred by an unwanted third party acquiror if such party owns or announces its intent to commence a tender offer for more than 15% of our outstanding common stock. The existence of this poison pill could delay, deter or prevent a takeover of Zoll. All of these provisions could limit the price that investors might be willing to pay in the future for shares of our common stock which could preclude our shareholders from recognizing a premium over the prevailing market price of our stock. WE HAVE ONLY ONE MANUFACTURING FACILITY FOR EACH OF OUR MAJOR PRODUCTS AND ANY DAMAGE OR INCAPACITATION OF EITHER OF THE FACILITIES COULD IMPEDE OUR ABILITY TO PRODUCE THESE PRODUCTS We have only one manufacturing facility which produces defibrillators and one separate manufacturing facility which produces electrodes. Damage to either facility could render us unable to manufacture the relevant product or require us to reduce the output of products at the damaged facility. This could materially and adversely impact our business, financial condition and results of operations. OUR CURRENT AND FUTURE INVESTMENTS MAY LOSE VALUE IN THE FUTURE We have made a $2.0 million investment in LifeCor, Inc., a development stage company, and may in the future invest in the securities of other companies and participate in joint venture agreements. This investment and future investments are subject to the risks that the entities in which we invest will become bankrupt or lose money. Investing in securities involves risks and no assurance can be made as to the profitability of any investment. Our inability to identify profitable investments could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations. Unless we hold a majority position in an investment or joint venture, we will not be able to control all of the activities of the companies in which we invest or the joint ventures in which we are participating. Because of this, such entities may take actions against our wishes and not in furtherance of, and even opposed to, our business plans and objectives. These investments are also subject to the risk of impasse if no one party exercises ultimate control over the business decisions. INVESTORS IN THIS OFFERING WILL SUFFER IMMEDIATE AND SUBSTANTIAL DILUTION IN THE NET TANGIBLE BOOK VALUE PER SHARE Investors will incur immediate and substantial dilution in the net tangible book value per share of the common stock they purchase in this offering. To the extent outstanding options to purchase common stock are exercised, there will be further dilution. 12
424B417th Page of 67TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 17th
INFORMATION REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS This prospectus contains forward-looking statements. The forward-looking statements are principally contained in the sections "Prospectus Summary," "Business" and "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations." These statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause our actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, performances or achievements expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to statements regarding: - market acceptance of new products; - competition in the industry; - the ability to satisfy demand for our products; - the impact of pending or future litigation; - the impact of future product recalls; - changes in, or the failure or inability to comply with, governmental regulation; - the integration of the personnel, products and operations of Pinpoint Technologies, Inc., which we recently acquired; - exchange rate fluctuations; - the availability of debt and equity financing; - the development of new competitive technologies; - the availability of key components for our products; - the availability of qualified personnel; - international, national, regional and local economic and political changes; - the value of our investments; - our production scheduling and related capacity levels; - general economic conditions; and - trends affecting the medical device industry, our financial condition or results of operations. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terms such as "may," "will," "should," "could," "would," "expects," "plans," "anticipates," "believes," "estimates," "projects," "predicts," "potential" and similar expressions intended to identify forward-looking statements. These statements reflect our current views with respect to future events and are based on assumptions and subject to risks and uncertainties. Given these uncertainties, you should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. We discuss many of these risks in greater detail under the heading "Risk Factors." Also, these forward-looking statements represent our estimates and assumptions only as of the date of this prospectus. Factors that might cause future results to differ include, but are not limited to, the following: - competition may lead to worse than expected financial condition or results of operations; - unpredictable demand for new products; - pending or future litigation may negatively impact our financial condition or results of operations; - future recalls may negatively impact our financial condition or results of operations; - government regulation may negatively impact our financial condition or results of operations; - the costs associated with integrating acquisitions may be larger than we anticipate; 13
424B418th Page of 67TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 18th
- exchange rate fluctuations may affect profitability of overseas sales; - manufacturing disruptions could negatively impact our financial condition or results of operations; - qualified personnel may not be available which could negatively impact our ability to grow our business; - the value of our investments may decline which could negatively impact our financial condition or results of operations; and - the production of commercially feasible products may take longer and cost more than expected. You should read this prospectus and the documents that we incorporate by reference in this prospectus completely and with the understanding that our actual future results may be materially different from what we expect. We may not update these forward-looking statements, even though our situation may change in the future. We qualify all of our forward-looking statements by these cautionary statements. 14
424B419th Page of 67TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 19th
USE OF PROCEEDS We estimate that the net proceeds we will receive from the sale of 1,500,000 shares of common stock will be approximately $58.4 million, or approximately $67.3 million if the underwriters fully exercise their over-allotment option, at an offering price of $41.75 per share and after deducting the underwriting discount and the estimated offering expenses. We expect to use the net proceeds of this offering as follows: - to fund business development, such as research and development and sales and marketing; - to fund future acquisitions, particularly in current and related lines of business; - to provide working capital; and - for general corporate purposes. We have not determined the amount of net proceeds to be used for each of the specific purposes listed. Accordingly, we will have broad discretion to use the proceeds as we see fit. MARKET PRICE OF COMMON STOCK Our common stock is traded publicly on the Nasdaq National Market under the symbol "ZOLL". We completed the initial public offering of our common stock on July 16, 1992. The following table shows the range of high and low sale prices per share of our common stock as reported by the Nasdaq National Market for the periods indicated. [Download Table] COMMON STOCK PRICE(1) ---------------------- HIGH LOW ------- ------- Fiscal year ended September 26, 1998 First Quarter............................................. $ 7.25 $ 5.16 Second Quarter............................................ 7.44 4.88 Third Quarter............................................. 8.00 5.50 Fourth Quarter............................................ 10.00 7.13 Fiscal year ended October 2, 1999 First Quarter............................................. 11.44 7.06 Second Quarter............................................ 12.75 8.50 Third Quarter............................................. 12.88 9.00 Fourth Quarter............................................ 31.81 11.88 Fiscal year ended September 30, 2000 First Quarter............................................. 41.38 22.63 Second Quarter (through February 22, 2000)................ 45.11 33.81 --------------- (1) The prices reflect the high and low closing prices as reported by the Nasdaq National Market. On February 22, 2000, the last sale price of our common stock reported by the Nasdaq National Market was $41.52 per share. As of February 22, 2000, there were 120 holders of record of our common stock. DIVIDEND POLICY We have not declared or paid cash dividends on our common stock in the past and do not intend to pay dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future. 15
424B420th Page of 67TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 20th
CAPITALIZATION The following table shows our capitalization as of January 1, 2000 on an actual basis and as adjusted to reflect the sale of 1,500,000 shares of common stock in this offering, at an offering price of $41.75 per share and after deducting the underwriting discounts and offering expenses. This table should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and related notes incorporated in this prospectus by reference and "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" appearing elsewhere in this prospectus. [Download Table] JANUARY 1, 2000 ---------------------- ACTUAL AS ADJUSTED ------- ----------- (IN THOUSANDS) Long-term debt.............................................. $ 2,029 $ 2,029 ------- -------- Stockholders' equity: Preferred stock, $0.01 par value; 1,000,000 shares authorized; none issued and outstanding........................................ -- -- Common stock, $0.02 par value; 19,000,000 shares authorized; 6,843,809 issued and outstanding, and 8,343,809 shares issued and outstanding as adjusted for this offering.......................................... 137 167 Additional paid-in capital................................ 23,697 82,091 Retained earnings......................................... 19,826 19,826 ------- -------- Total stockholders' equity............................. 43,660 102,084 ------- -------- Total capitalization.............................. $45,689 $104,113 ======= ======== The above data excludes 1,063,918 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of options outstanding as of January 1, 2000 at a weighted average exercise price of $13.84 per share. DILUTION Our net tangible book value as of January 1, 2000 was approximately $43.2 million, or $6.31 per share. Net tangible book value per share represents the amount of our total tangible assets less total liabilities divided by the total number of shares of common stock outstanding. After giving effect to the sale by us of 1,500,000 shares of common stock offered by this prospectus at an offering price of $41.75 per share and after deducting the underwriting discounts and the estimated offering expenses, our net tangible book value at January 1, 2000 would have been approximately $101.6 million, or $12.18 per share. This represents an immediate increase in net tangible book value of $5.87 per share to existing stockholders and an immediate dilution of $29.57 per share to new investors in this offering, as illustrated by the following table: [Download Table] Public offering price per share...................... $41.75 Net tangible book value per share before the offering............................................ $6.31 Increase per share attributable to new investors..... 5.87 ----- Net tangible book value per share after the offering... 12.18 ------ Net tangible book value dilution per share to new investors............................................. $29.57 ====== 16
424B421st Page of 67TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 21st
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA The following selected financial data should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and related notes and "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" appearing elsewhere in this prospectus. The selected financial data below as of and for each of the five most recent fiscal years have been derived from our audited consolidated financial statements. Our selected financial data as of January 1, 2000 and for each of the three months ended January 2, 1999 and January 1, 2000 were derived from our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements. [Enlarge/Download Table] FISCAL YEARS ENDED THREE MONTHS ENDED -------------------------------------------------------- ------------------- SEPT. 30, SEPT. 28, SEPT. 27, SEPT. 26, OCT. 2, JAN. 2, JAN. 1, 1995 1996 1997(1) 1998 1999 1999 2000 --------- --------- --------- --------- -------- -------- -------- (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA) (UNAUDITED) STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS DATA: Net sales............................ $ 45,884 $ 55,700 $ 57,833 $ 57,520 $ 78,682 $ 16,056 $ 24,435 Cost of goods sold................... 20,421 24,545 25,372 24,268 32,486 6,532 10,843 -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- Gross profit......................... 25,463 31,155 32,461 33,252 46,196 9,524 13,592 Expenses: Selling and marketing.............. 15,575 16,773 18,484 20,152 24,364 5,415 7,674 General and administrative......... 4,313 4,809 6,749 6,239 7,422 1,630 1,952 Research and development........... 4,360 4,464 6,430 6,583 6,916 1,603 1,731 -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- Total expenses.................. 24,248 26,046 31,663 32,974 38,702 8,648 11,357 -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- Income from operations............... 1,215 5,109 798 278 7,494 876 2,235 Net investment income (expense)...... 243 278 355 413 (45) 66 (70) -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- Income before income taxes........... 1,458 5,387 1,153 691 7,449 942 2,165 Provision for income taxes........... 496 1,758 266 18 2,010 240 801 -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- Net income........................... $ 962 $ 3,629 $ 887 $ 673 $ 5,439 $ 702 $ 1,364 -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- Basic earnings per share............. $ 0.15 $ 0.55 $ 0.13 $ 0.10 $ 0.82 $ 0.11 $ 0.20 ======== ======== ======== ======== ======== ======== ======== Weighted average common shares outstanding........................ 6,519 6,562 6,602 6,602 6,656 6,628 6,794 Diluted earnings per share........... $ 0.15 $ 0.55 $ 0.13 $ 0.10 $ 0.79 $ 0.10 $ 0.19 ======== ======== ======== ======== ======== ======== ======== Weighted average common and equivalent shares outstanding...... 6,613 6,635 6,650 6,647 6,893 6,730 7,196 Pro forma information(2): Historical income before income taxes........................... $ 7,449 $ 942 Pro forma incremental operating cost............................ 272 65 -------- -------- Pro forma income before income taxes........................... 7,177 877 Pro forma provision for income taxes........................... 2,402 300 -------- -------- Pro forma net income............... $ 4,775 577 ======== ======== Pro forma diluted earnings per share........................... $ 0.69 $ 0.09 ======== ======== [Enlarge/Download Table] SEPT. 30, SEPT. 28, SEPT. 27, SEPT. 26, OCT. 2, JANUARY 1, 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 --------- --------- --------- --------- ---------- ----------- (IN THOUSANDS) (UNAUDITED) BALANCE SHEET DATA: Cash and cash equivalents.................... $ 5,641 $ 5,107 $ 9,958 $ 5,521 $ 1,821 $ 1,284 Working capital.............................. 24,223 25,303 24,361 21,678 26,728 28,440 Total assets................................. 36,263 42,507 45,013 46,656 59,687 63,020 Total long-term debt, excluding current portion.................................... 864 713 565 446 2,069 2,029 Total stockholders' equity................... 29,596 33,614 34,463 34,787 41,222 43,660 --------------- (1) For the year ended September 27, 1997, excluding one-time charges totaling $2,300, net income would have been $2,405 and basic and diluted earnings per share would have been $0.36. (2) Pro forma information reflects the effect of (i) incremental operating costs expected to be incurred by the Company as a result of the Pinpoint merger and (ii) the provision for corporate income taxes on the previously untaxed Subchapter S corporation earnings of Pinpoint. See Note B to the consolidated financial statements. 17
424B422nd Page of 67TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 22nd
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS You should read the following discussion and analysis in conjunction with our financial statements and related notes thereto included elsewhere in this prospectus. OVERVIEW On October 15, 1999, we acquired Pinpoint Technologies, Inc. and Pinpoint Property Management LLC (Pinpoint individually and collectively) in a business combination accounted for as a pooling of interests. Pinpoint, which creates, develops and manufactures advanced information technology software, exclusively focused on the emergency medical system market, became our wholly owned subsidiary through the exchange of approximately 433,000 shares of our common stock for all of the outstanding stock of Pinpoint. The Selected Financial Data appearing elsewhere in this prospectus are derived from the consolidated financial statements and presented on the assumption that the companies were combined for all periods presented, and financial statements of prior years have been restated to give effect to the combination. RESULTS OF OPERATIONS THREE MONTHS ENDED JANUARY 1, 2000 COMPARED TO THREE MONTHS ENDED JANUARY 2, 1999 Our net sales increased 52.2% to $24,435,000 for the three months ended January 1, 2000 from $16,056,000 for the three months ended January 2, 1999. Our sales growth was driven primarily by increasing demand for the new M Series line of defibrillators/pacemakers. Sales growth also reflected additional headcount in our North America sales force. We experienced significant growth in all major geographies and segments of our business. During the first quarter of 2000, North American sales increased 38.7% to $19,193,000 from $13,837,000 for the comparable period in 1999. Equipment sales to both the hospital and pre-hospital markets increased 70.4% and 22.4% respectively, to $10,527,000 and $4,845,000, respectively, as compared to the same period in the prior year. International sales increased 136.2% to $5,242,000 compared to $2,219,000 reflecting the preferential allocation of the M Series defibrillators to the North American market during the prior year first quarter as well as the revenue from the initial German Army shipments under the multi-year agreement. Gross margin for the first quarter of 2000 was 55.6% compared to 59.3% for the comparable prior year quarter. The decrease reflected volume pricing on our large German Army contract and the change in mix of electrode sales and capital equipment. Selling and marketing expenses as a percentage of net sales decreased to 31.4% from 33.7%. The decrease in selling and marketing expenses as a percentage of sales reflects leveraging from our reorganized, expanded North American sales force as we increased sales volume. Selling and marketing expenses increased 41.7% to $7,674,000 due primarily to an increase in sales force headcount. General and administrative expenses decreased as a percentage of net sales to 8.0% from 10.2%. The decrease in the general and administrative expenses as a percentage of sales reflects the absorption of relatively fixed operating expenses by increased sales volume. Research and development expenses decreased as a percentage of net sales to 7.1% from 10% reflecting primarily the significant increase in sales. Research and development expenses increased 8.0% to $1,731,000 from $1,603,000 for the comparable prior year quarter reflecting continued M Series development and other initiatives. The effective tax rate increased from 25.5% to 37.0% for the three months ended, January 1, 2000 as compared to the same period in 1999. This increase primarily relates to the fact that, prior to the Pinpoint acquisition, the operating results of Pinpoint did not include any provision for income taxes because Pinpoint operated as a Subchapter S corporation for income tax purposes. 18
424B423rd Page of 67TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 23rd
1999 COMPARED TO 1998 Net sales reached record levels, increasing 37% from the prior year to $78.7 million, reflecting the rapid market acceptance of the M Series defibrillators introduced to the market during the fourth quarter of 1998. Sales growth also reflected the reorganization and enlargement of the North American sales force to allow for a market-focused structure. Dedicated selling teams are now focused on each of North America's markets: hospital and pre-hospital. We experienced significant growth in all major geographies and segments of our business. During 1999, North American sales increased 36% to $65 million. Within North America, equipment sales to the hospital and pre-hospital markets increased 55% and 28%, to $30.9 million and $19.1 million, respectively. Sales in the international market increased 39% from the prior year. Gross margin increased approximately 1% over the prior year. We experienced an improvement in costs reflecting the M Series defibrillators introduction and higher margins from data management products, primarily Pinpoint products. Selling and marketing costs increased 21% over the prior year, due to the increase in size of the North American sales force. Additionally, we established a direct sales force in Germany during the fourth quarter of 1999. Selling and marketing costs as a percentage of net sales decreased from 35% to 31%, reflecting revenues which increased more rapidly than these costs as a result of the reorganization of the North American sales force. General and administrative expenses decreased as a percentage of sales, from 11% to 9%, due to emphasis on expense controls and absorption of relatively fixed expenses by higher sales. Research and development expenses decreased as a percentage of sales, from 11% to 9%. Total expenses increased slower than revenues, reflecting the completion of development of the initial M Series defibrillators and the related transfer of available resources to the biphasic project and other initiatives. We incurred net investment expense in 1999, as compared to net investment income in 1998, due to the decrease in average cash balances from 1998 to 1999 and increased interest expense. The income tax provision increased from $18,000 in 1998 to $2,010,000 in 1999. This increase results primarily from increased domestic profitability partially offset by the benefits resulting from the utilization of tax loss carryforwards from foreign operations. The operating results of Pinpoint for all periods presented do not include any provision for income taxes as the company operated as a Subchapter S corporation for income tax purposes. In the future, our consolidated income tax provision will include an income tax provision for Pinpoint's taxable income. 1998 COMPARED TO 1997 Our net sales remained relatively flat at $57,520,000 for 1998. An increase in sales of disposable electrodes and data management products, particularly Pinpoint, was offset by a decrease in equipment sales. We believe that the decrease in equipment sales in North America was primarily the result of customers holding back on purchases while waiting for the release of the M Series defibrillators, which was not shipped until the end of the fourth quarter of 1998. In addition, the decrease in sales in the international market was primarily a result of depressed foreign markets. The M Series did not have any significant impact on the sales to the international markets in 1998 as the roll out to international distributors continued into 1999. Gross profit increased as a percentage of sales from 56% to 58%. The increase is a result of a higher mix of disposable electrodes and data management products, particularly Pinpoint, relative to the equipment business. Selling and marketing expenses increased as a percentage of sales from 32% to 35%. Selling and marketing expenses increased 9% from $18,484,000 to $20,152,000. This increase was primarily due to higher payroll related cost and travel expenditures reflecting the reorganization of the North American 19
424B424th Page of 67TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 24th
sales force. This mid-year reorganization increased the size of and split the sales force to focus on two distinct markets: hospital and pre-hospital. The increase in selling and marketing expenses was due also to an increase in expenditures for promotion, advertising and other selling activities related to the introduction of the M Series defibrillators and higher international selling expenditures offset by a decrease in product services and support. General and administrative expenses slightly decreased as a percentage of sales from 12% to 11%. General and administrative expenses decreased 8% from $6,749,000 to $6,239,000. This decrease was due primarily to the occurrence of a one-time charge recognized in 1997 of $1,300,000 related to the estimated cost of proceeding to trial in a class action shareholder lawsuit. This decrease was partially offset by an increase in 1998 for payroll related costs and professional services. Research and development expenses remained consistent as a percentage of sales. Research and development expenses increased from $6,430,000 to $6,583,000. In 1997, a charge of $1,000,000 was made to account for the value of in-process research and development acquired in the purchase of assets from Westech. Excluding this charge, research and development expenses increased by 21%, or $1,153. This increase was due primarily to an increase in prototype and testing expenses for new technology and start-up costs for the M Series defibrillators and an increase in payroll related costs. Net investment income increased from the prior year due primarily to higher average cash balances. At September 26, 1998, we had available tax loss carryforwards of approximately $1,600,000, which were primarily attributable to our foreign operations and were not available to offset domestic taxable income. LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES Our cash and cash equivalents at January 1, 2000 totaled $1,284,000 compared with $1,821,000 at October 2, 1999, a decrease of $537,000. Cash provided by operating activities for the three months ended January 1, 2000 totaled $2,000, while cash used over the same period in 1999 totaled $2,094,000. Cash provided by operating activities for the first quarter of fiscal 2000 included the payment of approximately $880,000 of accounts payable related to the 1999 purchase of our new Enterprise Resource Planning information technology system from Oracle Corporation. The increase in cash provided by operations was primarily attributable to an increase in net income and a reduction in the usage of cash for accounts receivable. Cash used for inventories reflected an increase in production of the M Series defibrillators resulting from the introduction of new features, strong product demand and year 2000 contingency planning. The amount of cash required to fund investing activities increased by $423,000 during the three months ended January 1, 2000 compared to the same period in 1999. The increase primarily reflected the purchase of additional capital equipment. Cash provided by financing activities increased by $1,006,000 during the three months ended January 1, 2000 compared to the same period in 1999. This increase was primarily due to the exercise of stock options. We maintain a working capital line of credit with our bank. Under this working capital line, we may borrow on a demand basis. Currently, we may borrow up to $12,000,000 at an interest rate equal to the bank's base rate (currently 8.25%) or LIBOR plus 2%. The outstanding balance under this line was zero at the end of the first quarter of both 2000 and 1999. 20
424B425th Page of 67TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 25th
BUSINESS OVERVIEW We design, manufacture and market an integrated line of proprietary, noninvasive cardiac resuscitation devices, our external defibrillators/pacemakers, as well as disposable electrodes and emergency medical system software data management solutions. Our cardiac resuscitation products are designed to improve survival rates from sudden cardiac arrest, which is a leading cause of death in the United States. Sudden cardiac arrest claims over 250,000 victims each year in the United States alone. For victims of sudden cardiac arrest, time is the most critical element for survival. According to the American Heart Association, more than 95% of victims with sudden cardiac arrest die, in many cases because life saving defibrillators arrive on the scene too late, if at all. The importance of immediate treatment creates an annual worldwide market for external defibrillator products, which we estimate to have been $525 million in 1999. We divide this market into three principal areas: the hospital, pre-hospital and public access defibrillation markets. The hospital market consists of doctors, nurses and other medical personnel who use defibrillators in hospital settings. The pre-hospital market consists of care providers such as paramedics, ambulance operators, emergency medical technicians, medically-trained firefighters and other emergency medical personnel. The public access market includes non-traditional providers such as police, non-medically trained firefighters and other non-medically trained personnel. We currently sell our products in the hospital and pre-hospital markets and plan to enter the public access defibrillation market in the next 12 to 24 months. We believe we are currently the second largest company in the world in external defibrillator product sales. From fiscal 1998 to fiscal 1999, our revenues increased 37%, making us the fastest growing worldwide external defibrillator company. In that time, our revenues in the hospital market increased 52%. Comparatively, we estimate that the overall hospital market grew at a rate of only 3% to 5%. Our newest line of defibrillators is the M Series, which we began shipping with the conventional monophasic waveform in September 1998. M Series defibrillators are smaller and lighter than competitive products, making them easier to use, carry and transport. We recently began shipping M Series defibrillators equipped with our proprietary biphasic waveform that provides improved defibrillation efficacy as compared to conventional monophasic waveforms. We have received clearance from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, or the FDA, to label our M Series defibrillators equipped with our biphasic waveform as being clinically superior to defibrillators with a monophasic waveform for particular uses. We are the only company to have received a claim of superiority on its biphasic waveform. We believe the clinical superiority of our biphasic waveform combined with product advantages including small size, light weight and relative ease-of-use offer compelling reasons for customers to choose our products. OUR BUSINESS STRATEGY The cardiac resuscitation market is a large and growing market driven by a demonstrated and increasing clinical need. Our business strategy is to continue to gain an increased share in both the domestic and international markets by offering superior products through direct sales distribution. While we plan to increase our share in markets that we currently serve, we also seek future growth by entering into new markets with significant opportunities. We believe that the following elements of our strategy may provide current and longer-term growth to our business: - CONTINUE TO EXPAND SUCCESSFUL SALES OF M SERIES DEFIBRILLATORS. A major element of our business strategy is to capitalize on the success of the M Series defibrillators in order to increase our market 21
424B426th Page of 67TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 26th
share in the hospital and pre-hospital markets. To date, the M Series is our best selling defibrillator, representing more than 80% of our capital equipment device sales in the first quarter of fiscal 2000. We plan to increase our profits in this segment by doing the following: -- improving on the M Series platform by adding more optional features and new technologies, which will increase revenues from each M Series defibrillator sold with such features; -- expanding our presence in both the domestic and international markets by hiring additional salespeople; and -- decreasing our cost of production for the M Series defibrillators through improved engineering of the defibrillator and more cost-effective manufacturing. - ESTABLISH A PRE-EMINENT CLINICAL POSITION IN BIPHASIC DEFIBRILLATION. We plan to capitalize on the industry-wide move towards biphasic waveforms. We believe that this trend will give customers a compelling reason to replace their monophasic defibrillators with biphasic defibrillators. Thus, we expect that the size of the external defibrillator market will increase. We are currently the only company to have received clearance from the FDA to label our M Series biphasic defibrillators as clinically superior to monophasic defibrillators for particular uses. We believe that the demonstrated clinical superiority of our proprietary biphasic waveform will offer a significant reason for customers to choose our biphasic defibrillator over the biphasic defibrillators of our competitors. We intend to capitalize on our clinically superior biphasic defibrillators to allow us to capture a larger percentage of the growing external defibrillator market. - ENTER THE PUBLIC ACCESS DEFIBRILLATION MARKET WITH A WELL-DIFFERENTIATED DEVICE. We are developing a device for the large and relatively unpenetrated public access defibrillation market, also referred to as the AED market. Our device will be relatively low-cost and easy to operate. We believe we will be able to leverage our experience selling to EMS personnel in our efforts to sell our device to police and fire departments. We also intend to market our device to other non-traditional providers of care. - SEEK ADDITIONAL GROWTH OPPORTUNITIES IN THE EMS DATA MANAGEMENT MARKET. We believe that the market for EMS data management solutions is significant and relatively unpenetrated. We are currently selling several products to this market. We are developing an integrated dispatch, clinical information, data collection, data transfer, billing and quality assurance software solution for sale to the EMS market. We intend to leverage our existing relationships with purchasing decision-makers in this market to sell our data management solutions. We believe our software solution will be differentiated by our ability to offer a complete data management solution which incorporates the clinical information collected by our defibrillators. OVERVIEW OF SUDDEN CARDIAC ARREST AND RESUSCITATION THERAPIES Sudden cardiac death results from the unresuscitated, sudden, abrupt loss or disruption of heart function. This loss of heart function, also known as sudden cardiac arrest, is caused by the heart beating too rapidly and/or chaotically. The American Heart Association, or AHA, estimates that sudden cardiac arrest claims more than 250,000 lives each year in the United States alone, making it a leading cause of death in the United States. According to the AHA, early defibrillation is the single most critical factor in rescuing a victim of sudden cardiac arrest. Each minute of delay in returning the heart to its normal 22
424B427th Page of 67TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 27th
pattern of beating decreases the chance of survival by 7% to 10%. As demonstrated in the graph shown below, very few resuscitation attempts are successful after 10 minutes. SURVIVAL CURVE Shown here in the printed form of this prospectus is a graph of survival rate vs. time to defibrillation. Time is displayed in minutes on the horizontal axis, and the percent survival rate is displayed on the vertical axis. At 0 minutes, the survival rate is above 70%, decreasing so that at 5 minutes, the survival rate is approximately 30%, and at 10 minutes the survival rate is less than 20%. The survival rate continues to decrease toward zero after 15 minutes. The Human Heart. The normal human heart has four chambers and expands and contracts over 100,000 times each day. The two smaller, upper chambers are the atria and the two larger, lower chambers are the ventricles. The walls of the atria and the ventricles are made up of cardiac muscle which contracts rhythmically when stimulated by an electrical current. Normally, the heartbeat starts in the right atrium when a specialized group of cells sends an electrical signal. This signal spreads though the atria and then moves to the ventricles. As a result, the atria contract a fraction of a second before the ventricles. This exact pattern must be followed to ensure that the heart beats properly. This contraction and relaxation of the four chambers pumps blood to the lungs and the rest of a body. Arrhythmias are abnormal rhythms of the heart caused by insufficient circulation of oxygenated blood, drugs, electrical shock, mechanical injury, disease or other causes. The three types of arrhythmias which our devices treat are ventricular fibrillation, atrial fibrillation and bradycardia. It is possible for a patient to experience more than one type of arrhythmia during a sudden cardiac arrest. In these situations, it is important to have resuscitation equipment which has both defibrillation and pacing capabilities. Ventricular Fibrillation. Ventricular fibrillation is a condition in which disordered electrical activity causes the ventricles to contract in a rapid, unsynchronized and uncoordinated fashion. When this occurs, an insufficient amount of blood is pumped from the heart. Ventricular fibrillation is the most common arrhythmia that causes sudden cardiac arrest. The onset of ventricular fibrillation often occurs without warning and causes the heart to stop abruptly. This sudden stopping of the heart is known as cardiac arrest, and is the cause of sudden cardiac death. The only accepted treatment of ventricular fibrillation is defibrillation, in which a powerful electric shock is delivered to the heart to stop the fibrillation and permit the return of coordinated cardiac contractions. In emergency situations, external defibrillation has conventionally been administered through hand-held paddles placed on the patient's chest. However, external defibrillation can also be administered through disposable adhesive electrodes, which we believe are safer and easier to use than paddles. Atrial Fibrillation. The AHA estimates that close to 2 million Americans suffer from atrial fibrillation. Atrial fibrillation is a condition in which disordered electrical activity causes the atria to contract in a rapid, unsynchronized and uncoordinated fashion. This inefficient contraction results in a smaller amount of blood entering the ventricles, which in turn results in an insufficient level of circulation. Since blood is not pumped completely out of the atria, the blood can pool and clot. While not immediately 23
424B428th Page of 67TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 28th
life threatening, atrial fibrillation can lead to significant health threats such as stroke. Over time, poorly functioning atria can also cause the ventricles to work harder, wear out sooner and eventually lead to cardiac arrest. Common forms of treatment for atrial fibrillation include cardioversion and drug therapies. During cardioversion, a defibrillator delivers an electric shock which is synchronized with a patient's heartbeat in order to return the atria to a normal rhythm. Cardioversion is usually an elective therapy, scheduled and performed in a controlled environment. All of our manual defibrillators include cardioversion capability. Bradycardia. Bradycardia is a condition in which the heart beats too slowly. The principal therapies for the emergency treatment of bradycardia are drugs and temporary cardiac pacing, either or both of which may be used to stimulate effective cardiac contractions and restore circulation. Cardiac pacing utilizes an electrical pulse to stimulate the patient's heartbeat. For the emergency treatment of bradycardia, there are two primary techniques for temporary pacing: invasive endocardial pacing, in which a wire is inserted directly into the heart to provide the electrical stimulus; and noninvasive temporary pacing, which uses gelled electrodes applied to the patient's chest to conduct an electrical stimulus. Noninvasive temporary pacing is an option on most of our defibrillators and is recommended as the first intervention for bradycardia in the AHA's resuscitation protocols. OUR CARDIAC RESUSCITATION PRODUCTS M SERIES DEFIBRILLATORS In September 1998, we shipped the first M Series defibrillators. The M Series is a new line of defibrillators for both the hospital and pre-hospital markets. For the first quarter of fiscal 2000, our M Series defibrillators represented over 80% of our capital equipment device sales. The M Series defibrillator has quickly become our best selling product to date and has been recently selected as the standard device in such places as The Mayo Clinic, Scripps Health System, The Johns Hopkins Hospitals and the White House. We believe the clinical superiority of our biphasic waveform combined with product advantages including portability, ease-of-use and the vivid screen display offer compelling reasons for customers to choose our M Series defibrillators. Our M Series is a standardized platform which allows for expandable features. As a result, we believe that this will help maximize customer retention by reducing the need for operator retraining and enhancing operator confidence. We believe that our standard M Series defibrillators offer the following competitive advantages: - PORTABILITY. The M Series defibrillator is the smallest, lightest full-featured external defibrillator. It is approximately one-half the weight and less than one-half of the size of the other leading devices in this class. This allows M Series defibrillators to be easily used, carried and transported with patients. - EASE-OF-USE WITH SIMPLE CONTROLS. The M Series defibrillators enable users to efficiently configure each unit, allowing local operating preferences to be individually programmed into each unit. Additionally, M Series defibrillators offer multiple language labeling as well as multiple language voice prompts to meet both domestic and international needs. - VIVID SCREEN DISPLAY. One of the distinguishing features included in M Series defibrillators is their high contrast screen. Our screen incorporates the most technologically advanced defibrillator display with a wider viewing angle than any LCD display. 24
424B429th Page of 67TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 29th
The following chart summarizes the features of the M Series as compared to the primary competitive products. PRODUCT COMPARISONS [Download Table] ------------------------------------------------------------- ZOLL PHYSIO-CONTROL AGILENT M SERIES LIFEPAK 12 CODEMASTER XL ------------------------------------------------------------- SIZE 574 in(3) 1680 in(3) 1454 in(3) ------------------------------------------------------------- WEIGHT 11 lbs. 22 lbs. 24 lbs. ------------------------------------------------------------- SCREEN High Contrast LCD CRT ------------------------------------------------------------- FUNCTIONS Multiple Multiple One ------------------------------------------------------------- 12 LEAD Integrated Integrated Add-On ------------------------------------------------------------- The M Series defibrillators are designed to be upgradable, allowing customers to add features depending upon their individual needs. The M Series defibrillators use our unique pacing technology, which has been clinically shown to provide superior capture rates, lower mean capture thresholds, less muscle impact and better patient tolerance. The M Series defibrillators are also available with our patented biphasic waveform. Some of the features which we currently offer include: - DIAGNOSTIC 12 LEAD ECG WITH INTERPRETIVE ALGORITHM. In October 1999, we received clearance from the FDA to include the GE Marquette Medical Systems 12SL analysis program, or 12 lead, in our M Series line of defibrillators. The 12 lead feature enables a user to see a diagnostic electrocardiogram, or ECG, tracing consisting of 12 leads, or views, of the heart's electrical activity. 12 lead is used to provide rapid and early identification of myocardial infarction, commonly called a heart attack, in the pre-hospital setting. We pay royalties on each 12SL analysis program we sell. - PULSE OXIMETRY. Pulse oximeters determine the oxygen saturation levels in blood, allowing a rapid identification of potential problems in the cardiopulmonary system. Since pulse oximeters can help detect the onset of cardiovascular incidents, pulse oximetry is now widely used in both hospital and pre-hospital settings when monitoring patients' vital signs. While conventional pulse oximeters do not perform well in motion or in intense light, we use Masimo Corporation's patented technology which is designed to overcome these technical problems. We have received 510(k) clearance to incorporate this pulse oximetry technology into our M Series defibrillators. The new pulse oximetry technology adds a new monitoring parameter that is essential during the transport and monitoring of critical patients. We purchase circuit boards and sensors from Masimo Corporation. We have a non-exclusive license to use the patented technology incorporated in these parts which we then incorporate into our products. - CODE MARKERS WITH COMPLETE DATA MANAGEMENT. Our new code marker system follows protocols established by the AHA and allows complete documentation of an event with our unique "one touch" data annotation feature. The record made of the event includes all information collected by the defibrillator and can be upgraded to include an optional voice recording. All of this data is stored on a removable data card. In the future, we intend to offer M Series defibrillators with additional features, including, among others: - CAPNOGRAPHY. Capnography, also known as etCO(2), is the measurement of the amount of carbon dioxide being exhaled, allowing for rapid identification of potential problems in the cardio-pulmonary system. We plan to purchase circuit boards and sensors from Novametrix Medical Systems Inc. to provide this feature. We currently expect to introduce the capnography feature during the next three to six months. - NONINVASIVE BLOOD PRESSURE MEASUREMENT. We are in the process of developing a noninvasive blood pressure, also known as NiBP, measurement capability to be integrated into our M Series defibrillators. The technology encompassing this product will be licensed from a third party. We currently expect to introduce the NiBP feature during the next nine to twelve months. 25
424B430th Page of 67TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 30th
BIPHASIC WAVEFORM External defibrillators deliver current over time to the heart, which results in a defined waveform shape. The waveform in general use today is monophasic, meaning that current is delivered in a single pulse that flows in one direction. A biphasic waveform, in contrast, delivers current that first flows in a positive direction for a period of time and then reverses direction so that it flows in a negative direction. Typical biphasic waveforms such as those used by our competitors appear to achieve the same defibrillation success rates as monophasic waveforms but at significantly lower current levels. Since less current is used, potential injury to the heart and skin is reduced with a biphasic shock compared to a monophasic shock. All of the major manufacturers of external defibrillators are beginning to produce devices which use biphasic waveforms. A comparison of monophasic, typical biphasic and our biphasic waveform is shown below. [DEFIBRILLATION WAVEFORMS] Shown here in the printed form of this prospectus is a graphic representation of three types of defibrillation wave forms: monophasic, typical biphasic, and ZOLL biphasic. Current is plotted on the vertical axis and duration is plotted on the horizontal axis in each graph. This graphic depicts the wave forms described in the preceding paragraph. Biphasic waveforms are the first major advance in defibrillation technology since the current monophasic waveform was adopted in the early 1960's. Although there have been feature enhancements that make new monophasic defibrillators easier to use and maintain, they have not proven to make defibrillators more clinically effective or safer and thus have not rendered the older models obsolete. At present, users generally replace existing defibrillators for mechanical and other reasons unrelated to any clinical superiority of a new defibrillator. Based on our sales and marketing experience, we estimate that users replace defibrillators after approximately seven to ten years of service. In light of the demonstrated clinical superiority of biphasic technology, however, we believe that the introduction of biphasic waveforms could accelerate the replacement of the large installed base of monophasic defibrillators. We believe this accelerated replacement will increase the size of the market for our defibrillators. OUR BIPHASIC WAVEFORM Our two primary competitors offer biphasic waveforms using the same general shape. We have developed a uniquely shaped biphasic waveform, however, which achieves higher efficacy at lower current levels than monophasic waveforms. We have received clearance from the FDA to market this new technology. As shown in the comparison graphs above, our new biphasic waveform reduces the heart's exposure to high peak current. In addition, our biphasic waveform keeps the waveform shape and duration constant over a wide range of patients whose differing physiologies impact the transmittal of current. Our M Series defibrillator equipped with our biphasic waveform is the only device cleared by the FDA to be labeled clinically superior to monophasic defibrillators for conversion of ventricular fibrillation in high-impedance patients, those patients who are difficult to defibrillate, and for cardioversion of atrial fibrillation. We therefore believe that our proprietary biphasic waveform is superior to the biphasic waveform utilized by any of our competitors. Moreover, we are able to achieve the highest reported efficacy with lower current levels than utilized by our competitors. We believe that our proprietary 26
424B431st Page of 67TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 31st
biphasic waveform will offer compelling clinical benefits that should give customers a reason to choose our biphasic defibrillators over those of our competitors. We have sponsored two clinical trials that have demonstrated that our proprietary biphasic waveform provides improved efficacy compared to conventional monophasic waveforms. In a randomized study for ventricular fibrillation of 184 patients, our biphasic waveform converted 99% of patients on the first shock compared to 93% of patients converted with the monophasic waveform. This compares favorably with the results obtained by other parties in similar trials. [First Shock Efficacy for VF] Shown here in the printed form of this prospectus is a graphic representation of the first shock efficacy for ventricular fibrillation. Percent efficacy is plotted on the vertical axis. On the horizontal axis, 4 trials are plotted: an Agilent trial, a Physio-Control trial and two Zoll trials. One of the Zoll trials was conducted with high-impedence patients, all of the other trials did not separate the patients by impedence. In Zoll's all patients trial, Zoll's biphasic waveform converted 99% of the patients on the first shock, compared to 93% of patients converted with a monophasic waveform. In the trial with high impedence patients, Zoll's biphasic converted approximately 99% of patients versus the approximately 86% converted with the monophasic waveform. In Agilent's trial, each of Agilent's biphasic and monophasic waveforms converted approximately 86% of the patient's on the first shock. In Physio-Control's trial, Physio-Control's biphasic waveform converted approximately 84% of patients versus the approximately 90% converted with the monophasic waveform. These studies also showed that our waveform required less than half the current for converting ventricular and atrial fibrillation than the conventional monophasic waveform. The graph below shows that less current is needed to achieve 100% efficacy with our biphasic waveform. [Amount of Current Needed to Achieve 100% Efficacy Current Required for VF] Shown here in the printed form of this prospectus is a horizontal bar graph which depicts the amount of current, in amperes, required for each of a monophasic waveform and Zoll's biphasic waveform to reach 100% efficacy. The monophasic waveform requires nearly 50 amperes, while Zoll's biphasic waveform only requires approximately 15 amperes to achieve efficacy. 27
424B432nd Page of 67TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 32nd
A second randomized trial of 165 patients compared the efficacy of our biphasic waveform to a conventional monophasic waveform for cardioversion of atrial fibrillation. Our investigators reported a 68% first shock efficacy for our waveform compared to just 21% for a conventional monophasic waveform. Overall, 94% of the patients randomized to our biphasic waveform were successfully cardioverted as compared to 79% of the patients treated with a monophasic waveform. To our knowledge, no other competitor has published results relating to their biphasic waveform in atrial fibrillation. CARDIOVERSION EFFICACY FOR ATRIAL FIBRILLATION Shown here in the printed form of this prospectus is a vertical bar graph which depicts the comparative percent efficacy for cardioversion of atrial fibrillation of each of: a first shock using a monophasic waveform versus a first shock using ZOLL's biphasic waveform; and a cumulative shock using a monophasic waveform versus a cumulative shock using ZOLL's biphasic waveform. The bar graph depicts graphically the results described in the preceding paragraph. We have received six U.S. patents covering various aspects of our novel biphasic waveform technology. One U.S. patent is still pending as are several corresponding foreign patents. DISPOSABLE ELECTRODES We offer a variety of single-patient-use, proprietary disposable electrodes for use with our resuscitation devices. Among our primary competitors, we are the only company to engineer and manufacture our own electrodes. We have continually innovated and upgraded our electrode product line, and in 1999 we introduced pro-padz(TM) Cardiology Specialty Multi-function Electrodes that utilize a new conductive liquid gel to carry the energy from a conductive plate to the patient. Our sales of electrodes in the North American market grew 8% from 1997 to 1998 and 17% from 1998 to 1999. Our margins for electrodes are generally higher than our margins for devices. We hope to sell more disposable electrodes in the future as more customers recognize the benefits of electrodes, which are safer for an operator of a defibrillator than traditional paddles. Another factor that might lead to higher electrode sales is the use of interpretive algorithms for automated defibrillation. The monitoring required to assess the patient's condition can only be achieved with electrodes and not with the traditional defibrillation paddles. Accordingly, we believe that the defibrillator industry is moving toward a greater relative use of electrodes. OTHER EXTERNAL DEFIBRILLATORS/PACEMAKERS We also manufacture and sell four other product lines of portable and stand-alone defibrillators with advisory capability, semi-automatic and manual operation as well as ancillary accessories and chargers. MARKET OVERVIEW We divide the market for noninvasive cardiac resuscitation equipment into three principal markets: the hospital, pre-hospital and public access defibrillation markets. The hospital market consists of doctors, nurses and other medical personnel who use defibrillators in a hospital setting. The pre-hospital market consists of care providers such as paramedics, ambulance operators, emergency medical technicians, medically-trained firefighters and other "first response" emergency medical personnel. The public access defibrillation market includes non-traditional providers such as police, non-medically trained firefighters, 28
424B433rd Page of 67TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 33rd
security officers, and other non-medically trained first responders. We estimate that the size of the worldwide market for external defibrillator products was approximately $525 million in 1999. OUR CURRENT MARKET U.S. Hospital Market. The U.S. hospital market consists of approximately 6,000 acute care community hospitals and 1,000 additional hospitals. Presently, we are the only company whose defibrillators are used at each of the top 12 cardiac hospitals in the United States as listed by U.S. News and World Report in July 1999. Hospitals have traditionally been the largest users of cardiac resuscitation equipment, both for patients admitted with sudden cardiac arrest and for patients at risk of sudden cardiac arrest undergoing other treatments. Many hospital procedures such as surgery, cardiac catheterization, stress testing and general anesthesia may induce arrhythmias or sudden cardiac arrest, and hospitals frequently use cardiac resuscitation devices on a standby basis in connection with these procedures. Since immediate treatment is the critical factor for successful cardiac resuscitation, hospitals typically place resuscitation devices throughout their facilities, including the cardiac and critical care units, emergency rooms, operating rooms, electrophysiology laboratories and, increasingly, general wards. Hospitals also use portable devices during in-hospital transportation of cardiac patients. We believe that the M Series defibrillators have allowed us to significantly increase our market share in the U.S. hospital market. Our revenues in the capital equipment device market in 1999 increased at a rate of 52% compared to the market's growth which we estimate to be between 3% and 5%. We hope to capitalize on the success of our M Series defibrillators to further expand our share of the U.S. hospital market. U.S. Pre-hospital Market. Most sudden cardiac arrests and heart attacks occur outside of the hospital. Due to the importance of immediate treatment, there is a substantial market for portable cardiac resuscitation equipment designed for use by various emergency responders. The most highly trained segment of the pre-hospital market is comprised of paramedics, who are all authorized and trained to use defibrillators to treat sudden cardiac arrest. In addition, paramedics are becoming increasingly aware of external pacing as a standard of care for the treatment of bradycardia. We believe that as noninvasive temporary pacing becomes more widely accepted in the hospital market, the use of combination pacemakers/defibrillators will become more widespread in the pre-hospital setting as well. Paramedics are also able to use more advanced diagnostics, such as diagnostic 12 lead. Emergency medical technicians, who are authorized to use automated external defibrillators, comprise a significant portion of the potential pre-hospital market as well. We believe the opportunity for growth in the underpenetrated pre-hospital market is large. Presently, approximately 50% of the estimated 35,000 ambulances in the United States are equipped with defibrillators. We believe that the percentage of ambulances equipped with defibrillators will grow, and that ambulances and other first response emergency vehicles will represent an increasingly important market for cardiac resuscitation equipment as the medical community places increased priority on providing such equipment and the necessary training to all first responders. Additionally, we believe that growth of our sales in the pre-hospital market has been constrained in the recent past due to the absence of 12 lead technology in our defibrillators. With our recent introduction of diagnostic 12 lead in the M Series defibrillators, we intend to increase our sales in the pre-hospital market and take greater market share within the paramedic segment of the pre-hospital market. International Market. The international market for defibrillators is less developed than the market in the United States. In the international market, unlike the U.S. market, the administration of pacing and defibrillation in hospitals is generally viewed as a skill reserved for physicians. Few other staff members are trained to administer such treatment. The international market for defibrillators for use outside of hospitals varies considerably from country to country and is somewhat less developed than the market in North America. 29
424B434th Page of 67TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 34th
We believe that the international market for defibrillators will grow for a number of reasons. - The international hospital market for defibrillators is expected to grow as more hospitals are built and existing hospitals modernize and update their approaches to cardiac and emergency care. - Emerging standards of care and the acceptance of automated equipment could result in increased use of cardiac resuscitation equipment by a broader range of health care personnel in the international market. - The European Resuscitation Council, the British Heart Foundation and virtually all cardiac-oriented organizations in Europe as well as the Australian Resuscitation Council have strongly supported initiatives to expand the availability of defibrillators as a major public health initiative. - External pacing is used much less frequently in Europe and other parts of the world than it is in the United States, but many countries are beginning to implement cardiac life support protocols which incorporate external pacing as a standard component. Because most international defibrillators do not presently feature external pacing, the move to defibrillators with external pacing could drive the international demand for defibrillators generally. We believe that we are positioned to take advantage of the growth in the international market for defibrillators, based on the recent success of the M Series defibrillators, our superior biphasic waveform, and the multiple language and other capabilities of the M Series defibrillators. We believe that there are significant opportunities to increase sales in the international market through the use of direct sales. Historically, we have used distributors instead of a direct sales force to sell our products internationally. We believe using a direct sales force could increase our revenues and market share in many countries. For example, we doubled our sales in the United Kingdom in 1999, which we believe was at least partially due to the efforts of our direct sales force established four years ago. In addition, Germany, which is second only to the United States in market size, may be a strong market for future growth. We are establishing a direct sales force in Germany and expect to expand this sales force in the coming year. In addition, we are beginning to fulfill our largest sales contract ever, a multi-year agreement with the German Army to supply up to 1,500 defibrillators. We intend to further expand our direct selling efforts in the coming years. OUR MARKET OPPORTUNITIES PUBLIC ACCESS DEFIBRILLATION USING AEDs Public access defibrillation, or PAD, involves providing low cost automated external defibrillators, or AEDs, to persons outside a hospital setting who are not medically trained. Automated defibrillators use an algorithm to determine if a patient's heart requires defibrillation and prompt the operator to deliver the shock. Although we presently offer AEDs in the hospital and pre-hospital markets, we are seeking to develop a low cost AED specifically targeted to the needs of the PAD market. Traditionally, defibrillators have only been used by personnel in hospitals and trained emergency medical service personnel in the pre-hospital market. As mentioned above, time from onset of sudden cardiac arrest to defibrillation is the most important factor in successfully treating sudden cardiac arrest. Victims are likely to die if they are not defibrillated within four to eight minutes of the onset of sudden cardiac arrest. This need for immediate treatment of cardiac arrest suggests that if more automated defibrillators can be deployed outside of the hospital setting, the likelihood of defibrillating a victim in the critical time frame will increase. Potential customers for such devices in this broad market include police and fire departments, office buildings and any other location where a large number of people congregate. Ultimately, AEDs could be marketed to private homes, where approximately 70% of cardiac arrests occur. In addition, we expect that demand for AEDs could increase as public awareness of the time constraints inherent in treating cardiac arrest grows and as more AEDs are introduced into highly visible, public places. Some of our competitors offer cardiac resuscitation equipment in the PAD market. We have not yet entered the PAD market due to its early stage of development and the high selling costs inherent to such a market. We do not believe the current AED manufacturers have generated profitable operations from the PAD market in the past. We believe, however, that this market is now expanding to the point where 30
424B435th Page of 67TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 35th
AEDs can be profitably sold. More distributors are requesting and selling AEDs. In addition, the recent passage of federal good samaritan legislation increases the likelihood that non-medically trained personnel will be providing care to victims of sudden cardiac arrest. Good samaritan legislation generally protects persons who render emergency assistance to others from liability for negligence in connection with their rendering of assistance. At least one state, Massachusetts, has amended its good samaritan law to specifically cover the use of AEDs by the general public. In addition, the AHA has begun to actively advocate PAD as a critical link in the "Chain of Survival," which refers to the four crucial links in the treatment of cardiac arrest. The AHA and virtually all corresponding international organizations have established programs to try to bring early defibrillation to every community. Early defibrillation is now included in AHA CPR training for all healthcare personnel and some lay persons. We believe that these developments, together with the introduction of AEDs in highly visible places, will lead to a larger market for AEDs. Because we expect the PAD market to mature, we intend to produce and sell low-cost AEDs in this market. We estimate that in calendar year 2000 the market for low-cost AEDs will exceed $63 million. We expect to introduce our low-cost AED within approximately 12 to 24 months. The device will monitor the patient's ECG and automatically prompt the operator throughout the defibrillation process. We intend to use a direct sales force to sell our AEDs wherever it proves cost effective to do so, and will sell through alternate distribution, such as distributors or manufacturers' representatives, in those markets that are too small to support a direct sales force. In addition, we expect that this market can be serviced by other alternative distribution methods, such as e-commerce, that can supplement and reduce our need for an expensive sales force. We also intend to use our experience of selling to emergency medical service personnel in our future efforts to sell AEDs to police and fire departments. EMS DATA MANAGEMENT SOLUTIONS We are developing a product called RescueNet(TM) to address what we consider to be a growing need in the EMS market for an integrated data management system. RescueNet(TM) will combine existing technologies developed by two of our subsidiaries with data collected from our cardiac resuscitation devices. This will allow our customers to purchase a single data management system that integrates dispatch, resuscitation information, data collection, data transfer, billing and quality assurance functions. Today, most EMS data is entered by hand on clipboards and then distributed or reentered manually into databases or to meet regulatory and insurance reporting requirements. The timeliness, accuracy and efficiency of this process is a key factor in the receipt of payments from third party payors. Nevertheless, a significant amount of revenue is lost due to data entry errors, misplaced paperwork or data, and additional time is lost duplicating data entries. As a result, we believe that the market for electronic field data collection is significant and relatively unpenetrated. Of the estimated 35,000 ambulances in the United States today, we estimate that less than 5,000 of them have any type of computer in place for the routine entry of data. Based upon our experience market interest in electronic field data collection is very high in part because EMS organizations are increasingly pressured to become more efficient. Using RescueNet(TM), caller information collected by the dispatcher would first be organized and compared to existing databases in the system. Almost immediately, useful information on the patient such as the patient's previous medical history, the closest ambulance to the patient's address, the patient's insurance numbers from previous service, and the patient's personal physician would be provided to the ambulance or EMS system through the use of wireless communications and radio links that already exist in most EMS systems. Data collected by EMS personnel on the road, including simple data such as arrival time at a scene or transport time to the hospital, as well as clinical data derived from our defibrillators such as the number of shocks given, when those shocks were given and at what energy levels, could be immediately shared via wireless connection with the hospital to which the patient is being brought. Information regarding services provided to the patient could be stored electronically for billing and record-keeping purposes. Such seamless information sharing would allow for better integration of information with the dispatcher and with the hospital to which the patient is being transported, while eliminating duplicative information collection. 31
424B436th Page of 67TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 36th
Ease-of-use and the need for efficiency in the use of information in billing, case review, training and operations analysis are the fundamental factors that we believe could drive the market for an integrated data management system in the pre-hospital market. Although we plan to sell RescueNet(TM) through a dedicated sales force, we intend to utilize our existing relationships with purchasing decision-makers in the EMS market who have purchased our defibrillators in the past and to obtain sales efficiencies and synergies through cross-selling. Our competition in dispatch, billing and mobile computing solutions consists of mostly smaller software companies. We believe we have a competitive advantage over other software companies due to our familiarity with the information collected and stored by our defibrillators. Our ability to analyze, store and retrieve this clinically important data could make our electronic field data collection products more attractive. We expect that the EMS data management business will be a significant part of our long-term growth strategy. We believe that this market could expand rapidly and that we are particularly well-positioned to become a significant competitor in this business. COMPETITION Our principal competitors in the United States are Physio-Control Corporation and Agilent Technologies, Inc. Physio-Control is a subsidiary of Medtronic, Inc., a leading medical technology company, and Agilent, which now includes Heartstream, Inc., was formerly part of Hewlett-Packard Company. Both Physio-Control and Agilent compete across our entire defibrillator product line. We also compete with Medical Research Labs, Inc. and SurVivaLink, Inc. in specific geographic areas and markets. In the international market we compete with both Physio-Control and Agilent, as well as approximately 12 other companies depending upon the country. Physio-Control is generally the market leader in the industry. We believe that the principal competitive factors in the hospital market for cardiac resuscitation equipment are clinical efficacy, reliability, portability, ease-of-use and standardization. In the pre-hospital market, in addition to the foregoing considerations, durability, a reliable battery system, and availability of 12 lead ECG capability are significant competitive factors. We believe that our products compete favorably with respect to each of these factors. Noninvasive temporary pacemakers and external defibrillators, such as those we sell, are used in emergency situations and, accordingly, do not compete with permanent, implantable pacemakers or defibrillators that are used to treat chronic arrhythmias. In fact, the products are complementary, because emergency cardiac resuscitation is often required during the implantation of a permanent device. The business of developing and marketing software for data collection, billing and management in the EMS market is competitive. Competitors in this business include PAD Systems, Healthware Technologies, Inc., Tritech Software Systems, Sweet Computer Services, Inc., RAM Software Systems, Inc., Intergraph Corporation and AmbPac, Inc. None of these competitors currently have a product that provides an integrated solution comparable to the RescueNet(TM) product currently in development. RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT Our research and development strategy is to improve and expand our product line through the application of our proprietary technology to both devices and electrodes. We pursue a multi-disciplinary approach to product design. We are currently focusing our research and development program in mechanical, software and electronic engineering, including both digital (microprocessor) and analog (high voltage) design. We hope to develop an inexpensive, easy-to-operate AED for the PAD market. We are also seeking to expand the M Series features and parameters and to develop further efficiencies in our M Series production, leading to lower costs. In addition, we are continuing our work on the development of the RescueNet(TM) product. 32
424B437th Page of 67TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 37th
MANUFACTURING Our facilities are located in Burlington, Massachusetts and Pawtucket, Rhode Island. Our executive headquarters are located at the Burlington facility, where we also conduct our device manufacturing operations and all of our research and development other than electrode and EMS data management research and development. We generally assemble our devices from components produced to our specifications by our suppliers. We own a 33,000 square foot building in Rhode Island, where we manufacture our electrode products and conduct related research and development. We own a 17,500 square foot building in Boulder, Colorado where our data management software business offices are located. We lease approximately 90,000 square feet of office and assembly space in Burlington under a lease expiring in August 2003, and 2,685 square feet of office space in Vancouver, British Columbia, under a lease expiring in 2002. We also have administrative offices in Manchester, England and Cologne, Germany. PATENTS AND PROPRIETARY INFORMATION Six U.S. patents have now been issued covering various aspects of our unique biphasic waveform technology. One U.S. patent relating to this waveform technology is still pending as are several corresponding foreign patents. During fiscal 1999, we filed several U.S. and foreign patent applications covering novel technology related to our pacing and defibrillation electrodes. These pending patents supplement other electrode patents issued or pending in the United States, Europe and Japan. A number of U.S. patents covering technologies incorporated into our other products have been issued. Foreign patents related to some of these technologies are pending. EMPLOYEES As of October 2, 1999, we employed 423 people on a full-time basis, 388 in the United States and 35 internationally. We also employed six part-time employees. None of our employees are subject to collective bargaining agreements. We believe that our relations with our employees are excellent. MARKETING AND SALES We use a direct sales force in the United States. In 1998, we split our sales force into dedicated groups, focused on the hospital and pre-hospital markets. Our total sales force was increased by 20% in both 1998 and 1999. We sell our RescueNet(TM) product through a separate dedicated sales force. In the United States, we currently have 48 sales representatives calling on hospitals, 33 calling on pre-hospital accounts and six selling our data management products. We have four sales representatives in Canada, five in the United Kingdom and two in Germany. We are in the process of hiring three additional sales representatives for the German market. GOVERNMENT REGULATION The manufacture and sale of our products are subject to extensive regulation by numerous governmental authorities, principally by the FDA and corresponding foreign agencies. The FDA administers the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act and the regulations promulgated thereunder. We are subject to the standards and procedures with respect to the manufacture of medical devices and are subject to inspection by the FDA for compliance with such standards and procedures. The FDA classifies medical devices into one of three classes depending on the degree of risk associated with each medical device and the extent of control needed to ensure safety and effectiveness. Our manual defibrillation and pacing products have been classified by the FDA as Class II devices. Our AED products have been classified as Class III devices. These devices must secure either a 510(k) pre-market notification clearance or an approved pre-market approval application before they can be introduced into the United States market. The process of obtaining 510(k) clearance typically takes several months and may involve the submission of limited clinical data supporting assertions that the product is substantially equivalent to another medical device on the market prior to 1976. The pre-market 33
424B438th Page of 67TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 38th
approval process typically requires substantially more time than does 510(k) clearance and requires the submission of significant quantities of clinical data and supporting information. Every company that manufactures or assembles medical devices is required to register with the FDA and to adhere to certain "good manufacturing practices (per the FDA's Quality System Regulation)" which regulate the manufacture of medical devices and prescribe record keeping procedures and provide for the routine inspection of facilities for compliance with such regulations. The FDA also has broad regulatory powers in the areas of clinical testing, marketing and advertising of medical devices. Medical device manufacturers are routinely subject to periodic inspections by the FDA. If the FDA believes that a company may not be operating in compliance with applicable laws and regulations, it can: - place the company under observation and reinspect the facilities; - issue a warning letter apprising of violative conduct; - detain or seize products; - mandate a recall; - enjoin future violations; and - assess civil and criminal penalties against the company, its officers or its employees. We are also subject to regulation in each of the foreign countries in which we sell our products. Many of the regulations applicable to our products in such countries are similar to those of the FDA. However, the national health or social security organizations of certain countries require our products to be qualified before they can be marketed in those countries. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS In the normal course of operations, we are involved in litigation arising from commercial disputes and claims of former employees and other matters. We do not believe any of these current claims will have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations. 34
424B439th Page of 67TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 39th
MANAGEMENT EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND DIRECTORS The following table shows information about our executive officers and directors as of February 22, 2000: [Enlarge/Download Table] NAME AGE POSITION ------------------------------------------ --- ------------------------------------------ Richard A. Packer......................... 42 Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer Donald R. Boucher......................... 48 Vice President -- Research and Development Steven K. Flora........................... 48 Vice President -- North American Sales Ward M. Hamilton.......................... 52 Vice President -- Marketing E.J. Jones................................ 57 Vice President -- International Sales A. Ernest Whiton.......................... 38 Vice President -- Administration and Chief Financial Officer James W. Biondi........................... 43 Director Willard M. Bright......................... 85 Director Thomas M. Claflin, II..................... 58 Director M. Stephen Heilman........................ 66 Director Daniel M. Mulvena......................... 51 Director Benson F. Smith........................... 52 Director Richard A. Packer joined the Company in 1992 and in November 1999, was appointed Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer. Mr. Packer served as President, Chief Operating Officer and Director from May 1996 to his appointment as CEO. Since 1992 he has served as Chief Financial Officer and Vice President of Operations of the Company. From 1987 to 1992, Mr. Packer served as Vice President of various functions for Whistler Corporation, a consumer electronics company. Prior to this, Mr. Packer was a manager with the consulting firm of PRTM/KPMG, specializing in operations of high technology companies. Mr. Packer has received B.S. and M. Eng. degrees from the Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute and an M.B.A. from the Harvard Graduate School of Business Administration. Donald R. Boucher joined the Company as Vice President of Research and Development in December 1993. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Boucher served from 1977 to 1993, with Corometrics Medical Systems, Inc., a manufacturer of fetal and neonatal monitors, most recently as Vice President of Engineering. Mr. Boucher received an M.B.A. from the University of Connecticut, an M.S.E. in bioengineering from the University of Pennsylvania, and a B.S. in engineering from Northeastern University. Steven K. Flora joined the Company as Vice President of North American Sales in September 1998. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Flora served from 1981 to 1998 in various positions with Marquette Medical systems, a manufacturer of cardiovascular and physiological monitoring systems, most recently as Vice President of Sales. Mr. Flora received his B.S. in Biology from the University of Illinois. Ward M. Hamilton joined the Company as Vice President of Marketing in February 1992. Prior to this time, Mr. Hamilton served from 1985 to 1991 as Director of New Business Development and Director of Marketing for ACLS products for Laerdal Medical Corporation, a manufacturer of portable automated defibrillators, and from 1977 to 1985 as Marketing Manager for defibrillators and noninvasive blood pressure monitors for Datascope Corporation. Mr. Hamilton received a B.A. in political science from Hartwick College and an M.P.A. in public administration from the University of Southern California. E.J. Jones joined the Company as Vice President of International Sales in November 1999. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Jones was Vice President of Operations with Apple Medical Corporation. He 35
424B440th Page of 67TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 40th
also spent 15 years with Millipore Corporation, holding various positions in Domestic and International Sales. Mr. Jones holds a B.S. in Microbiology/Biochemistry from the University of Illinois and is a graduate of the Advanced Management Program from the Harvard Business School. A. Ernest Whiton joined the Company as Vice President of Administration and Chief Financial Officer in January 1999. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Whiton was Vice President and Chief Accounting officer of Ionics, Inc., a global separations technology company, which he joined in 1993. Prior to Ionics, he was a manager at Price Waterhouse. Mr. Whiton has received a B.S. in Accounting from Bentley College and an M.B.A. from the Harvard Graduate School of Business Administration. James W. Biondi joined the Company as a Director in 1999. Dr. Biondi has served as Chairman of Cardiopulmonary Corp. since its founding in 1988, and Chief Executive Officer and President since 1992. Cardiopulmonary Corp. designs, develops, and assembles advanced software driven ventilators used for the treatment of anesthesia and intensive care patients. Since 1992, Dr. Biondi has been an Adjunct Assistant Professor of Medicine at Yale University School of Medicine. Dr. Biondi also serves as director of Ivy Biomedical Systems, Inc. Willard M. Bright joined the Company in 1983, and previously served as the Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Company. Prior to joining the Company, Dr. Bright served as President and Chief Executive Officer of The Kendall Company and Boehringer Mannheim Corporation, medical products manufacturers, and President and director of Curtiss-Wright Corp., an aerospace and industrial products manufacturer. Dr. Bright is a director of MacroChem Corporation. Thomas M. Claflin, II joined the Company as a Director in 1980. Mr. Claflin is a principal of Claflin Capital Management, Inc., a venture capital firm, and general partner of its venture capital partnerships. M. Stephen Heilman joined the Company as a Director in 1996. Dr. Heilman founded and has served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Lifecor, Inc., a medical device company, since its inception in 1986. Dr. Heilman also founded and has served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Vascor, Inc. since its inception in 1986, and also founded Medrad Inc. in 1964. Dr. Heilman is a director of SkyMark Corporation, Medrad Inc. and Precision Therapeutics. Daniel M. Mulvena joined the Company as a Director in 1998. Mr. Mulvena is the owner of Commodore Associates, Inc., a consulting company. From 1992 to 1995, Mr. Mulvena was a Group Vice President of Boston Scientific Corporation. Mr. Mulvena serves as Chairman of the Board of Directors of Echo-cath, Inc. and Magna Lab, Inc. He is also a director of Thoratec Laboratories, Inc. and Cambridge Heart, Inc. Benson F. Smith joined the Company as a Director in 2000. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Smith was formerly President, Chief Operating Officer and a member of the Board of Directors of C.R. Bard, Inc. Mr. Smith worked at C.R. Bard, Inc. in various capacities for 25 years until his retirement in 1998. Mr. Smith currently serves as a board member for a variety of academic and health-related organizations. 36
424B441st Page of 67TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 41st
PRINCIPAL STOCKHOLDERS The following table shows information regarding beneficial ownership of our common stock as of January 25, 2000 by: - each of our directors and executive officers; - all directors and officers as a group; and - each person known by us to be the beneficial owner of 5% or more of our common stock. [Enlarge/Download Table] PERCENT OF COMMON STOCK NUMBER OF BENEFICIALLY OWNED SHARES ------------------- BENEFICIALLY BEFORE AFTER NAME OF BENEFICIAL OWNER OWNED OFFERING OFFERING ----------------------------------------------------- ------------ -------- -------- Richard A. Packer(1)................................. 51,550 * * Steven K. Flora(2)................................... 13,800 * * Ward M. Hamilton(3).................................. 53,500 * * E.J. Jones(4)........................................ 10,100 * * A. Ernest Whiton(5).................................. 10,000 * * James W. Biondi(6)................................... 3,500 * * Willard M. Bright(7)................................. 119,200 1.7% 1.4% Thomas M. Claflin, II(8)............................. 69,245 1.0 * M. Stephen Heilman(9)................................ 56,500 * * Daniel M. Mulvena(10)................................ 2,500 * * Benson Smith(11)..................................... 0 * * All executive officers and directors as a group (11 persons)(12)....................................... 389,895 5.5 4.6 The Kaufmann Fund, Inc.(13).......................... 725,000 10.6 8.7 140 E. 45th St., 43rd Floor Suite 2624 New York, New York 10017 Pilgrim Baxter & Associates, Ltd.(14)................ 502,600 7.3 6.0 825 Duportail Road Wayne, Pennsylvania 19087 Dimensional Fund Advisors Inc.(15)................... 415,200 6.1 5.0 1299 Ocean Avenue, 11th Floor Santa Monica, California 90401 --------------- * Less than 1%. (1) Includes 38,250 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of stock options which are exercisable within 60 days after January 25, 2000. Does not include options to purchase 103,750 shares of common stock which are not exercisable within 60 days after January 25, 2000. (2) Includes 10,000 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of options which are exercisable within 60 days after January 25, 2000. Does not include options to purchase 30,000 shares of common stock which are not exercisable within 60 days after January 25, 2000. (3) Represents 53,500 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of options which are exercisable within 60 days after January 25, 2000. Does not include options to purchase 7,500 shares of common stock which are not exercisable within 60 days after January 25, 2000. (4) Includes 10,000 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of options which are exercisable within 60 days after January 25, 2000. Does not include options to purchase 30,000 shares of common stock which are not exercisable within 60 days after January 25, 2000. 37
424B442nd Page of 67TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 42nd
(5) Represents 10,000 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of options which are exercisable within 60 days after January 25, 2000. Does not include options to purchase 30,000 shares of common stock which are not exercisable within 60 days after January 25, 2000. (6) Includes 2,500 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of options which are exercisable within 60 days after January 25, 2000. Does not include options to purchase 7,500 shares of common stock which are not exercisable within 60 days after January 25, 2000. (7) Represents 111,700 shares of common stock held by the Willard M. Bright Revocable Inter Vivos Trust dated August 2, 1990 and 7,500 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of options which are exercisable within 60 days after January 25, 2000. Does not include options to purchase 7,500 shares of common stock which are not exercisable within 60 days after January 25, 2000. (8) Includes 229 shares of common stock held by Mr. Claflin's spouse and 3,278 shares held by various Claflin Capital Management, Inc. partnership entities, as to which Mr. Claflin disclaims beneficial ownership, and 5,000 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of options which are exercisable within 60 days after January 25, 2000. Does not include options to purchase 5,000 shares of common stock which are not exercisable within 60 days after January 25, 2000. (9) Includes 7,500 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of options which are exercisable within 60 days after January 25, 2000. Does not include options to purchase 5,000 shares of common stock which are not exercisable within 60 days after January 25, 2000. (10) Includes 2,500 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of options which are exercisable within 60 days after January 25, 2000. Does not include options to purchase 7,500 shares of common stock which are not exercisable within 60 days after January 25, 2000. (11) Does not include options to purchase 10,000 shares of common stock which are not exercisable within 60 days after January 25, 2000. (12) Includes 146,750 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of options which are exercisable within 60 days after January 25, 2000. Does not include options to purchase 243,750 shares of common stock which are not exercisable within 60 days after January 25, 2000. (13) Based on information set forth in a Schedule 13F-HR filed under the Exchange Act on January 19, 2000. (14) Based on information set forth in a Schedule 13G filed under the Exchange Act on January 7, 2000. (15) Based on information set forth in a Schedule 13G filed under the Exchange Act on February 11, 1999. RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS M. Stephen Heilman is Founder, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Lifecor, Inc., in which we have made a $2 million investment. Pursuant to an agreement entered into in connection with such investment, we have agreed to Dr. Heilman serving as a director of the Company, and a representative of the Company serving as a director of Lifecor, Inc. On January 7, 1999, we entered into an agreement with Elliott Associates, L.P. and Westgate International, L.P., shareholders of the Company who together owned approximately 15.4% of our Common Stock as of such date. Pursuant to the terms of the agreement, Elliott and Westgate proposed, and we agreed, that the Board of Directors would be expanded to eight members and Dr. James W. Biondi would be elected as a Director to fill the resulting vacancy. On January 7, 1999, Dr. Biondi became a Director. Elliott and Westgate are no longer significant shareholders of the Company. 38
424B443rd Page of 67TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 43rd
UNDERWRITING Subject to the terms and conditions stated in the underwriting agreement, each underwriter named below has severally agreed to purchase, and we have agreed to sell to such underwriter, the number of shares set forth opposite the name of such underwriter. [Download Table] NUMBER NAME OF SHARES ---- --------- Salomon Smith Barney Inc. .................................. 606,000 U.S. Bancorp Piper Jaffray, Inc. ........................... 472,500 Adams, Harkness & Hill, Inc. ............................... 270,000 Banc of America Securities LLC.............................. 22,500 Chase H&Q................................................... 22,500 Donaldson, Lufkin & Jenrette Securities Corporation......... 22,500 Robert W. Baird & Co. Incorporated.......................... 12,000 William Blair & Company, L.L.C. ............................ 12,000 Dain Rauscher Wessels, a division of Dain Rauscher Incorporated.............................................. 12,000 Gerard Klauer Mattison & Co., Inc. ......................... 12,000 Pacific Growth Equities, Inc................................ 12,000 Ryan, Beck & Co. ........................................... 12,000 Tucker Anthony Cleary Gull.................................. 12,000 --------- Total.................................................. 1,500,000 ========= The underwriting agreement provides that the obligations of the several underwriters to purchase the shares included in this offering are subject to approval of legal matters by counsel and to other conditions, including receipt of certificates from us, receipt of letters from our accountants, the status of the trading of our common stock on Nasdaq or securities on the New York Stock Exchange or Nasdaq and the absence of a banking moratorium, hostilities or a crisis. The underwriters are obligated to purchase all the shares (other than those covered by the over-allotment option described below) if they purchase any of the shares. The underwriters propose to offer some of the shares directly to the public at the public offering price set forth on the cover page of this prospectus and some of the shares to certain dealers at the public offering price less a concession not in excess of $1.44 per share. The underwriters may allow, and such dealers may reallow, a concession not in excess of $0.10 per share on sales to other dealers. If all the shares are not sold at the initial offering price, the representatives may change the public offering price and the other selling terms. We have granted to the underwriters a 30-day option to purchase up to an additional 225,000 shares to cover over-allotments, if any, at the public offering price less the underwriting discount. The underwriters may exercise this option solely for the purpose of covering over-allotments, if any, in connection with this offering. To the extent this option is exercised, each underwriter will be obligated, subject to the conditions stated above, to purchase a number of additional shares approximately proportionate to such underwriter's initial purchase commitment. We, our officers and directors and some of our non-institutional stockholders have agreed that, for a period of 90 days from the date of this prospectus, they will not, without the prior written consent of Salomon Smith Barney Inc., dispose of or hedge any shares of our common stock or any securities convertible into, or exercisable or exchangeable for common stock. Salomon Smith Barney Inc. in its sole discretion may release any of the securities subject to these lock-up agreements at any time without notice. The common stock is quoted on the Nasdaq National Market under the symbol "ZOLL." 39
424B444th Page of 67TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 44th
The following table shows the underwriting discounts and commissions to be paid to the underwriters by us in connection with this offering. These amounts are shown assuming both no exercise and full exercise of the underwriters' option to purchase additional shares of common stock. [Enlarge/Download Table] PAID BY ZOLL ---------------------------- NO EXERCISE FULL EXERCISE ----------- ------------- Per share................................................... $ 2.40 $ 2.40 Total....................................................... $3,600,938 $4,141,078 In connection with this offering Salomon Smith Barney Inc., on behalf of the underwriters, may purchase and sell shares of common stock in the open market. These transactions may include over-allotment, syndicate covering transactions and stabilizing transactions. Over-allotment involves syndicate sales of common stock in excess of the number of shares to be purchased by the underwriters in this offering, which creates a syndicate short position. Syndicate covering transactions involve purchases of the common stock in the open market after the distribution has been completed in order to cover syndicate short positions. Stabilizing transactions consist of certain bids for or purchases of common stock made for the purpose of preventing or retarding a decline in the market price of the common stock while this offering is in progress. The underwriters also may impose a penalty bid. Penalty bids permit the underwriters to reclaim a selling concession from a syndicate member when Salomon Smith Barney Inc., in covering syndicate short positions or making stabilizing purchases, repurchases shares originally sold by that syndicate member. Any of these activities may cause the price of the common stock to be higher than the price that otherwise would exist in the open market in the absence of such transactions. These transactions may be effected on the Nasdaq National Market or in the over-the-counter market, or otherwise and, if commenced, may be discontinued at any time. In addition, in connection with this offering, the underwriters (and selling group members) may engage in passive market making transactions in the common stock on the Nasdaq National Market, prior to the pricing and completion of the offering. Passive market making consists of displaying bids on the Nasdaq National Market no higher than the bid prices of independent market makers and making purchases at prices no higher than those independent bids and effected in response to order flow. Net purchases by a passive market maker on each day are limited to a specified percentage of the passive market maker's average daily trading volume in the common stock during a specified period and must be discontinued when such limit is reached. Passive market making may cause the price of the common stock to be higher than the price that otherwise would exist in the open market in the absence of such transactions. If passive market making is commenced, it may be discontinued at any time. We estimate that the total expenses, excluding underwriting discounts and commissions, of this offering will be $600,000. We have agreed to indemnify the underwriters against liabilities to which they may become subject, including liabilities that may arise under the Securities Act of 1933, the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or other federal or state statutory law or regulation, at common law or otherwise or to contribute to payments the underwriters may be required to make in respect of any of those liabilities. 40
424B445th Page of 67TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 45th
LEGAL MATTERS The validity of the common stock offered in this prospectus will be passed upon for Zoll by Goodwin, Procter & Hoar LLP, Boston, Massachusetts. Other legal matters in connection with this offering will be passed upon for the underwriters by Cravath, Swaine & Moore, New York, New York. EXPERTS Ernst & Young LLP, independent auditors, have audited our consolidated financial statements at September 26, 1998 and October 2, 1999, and for each of the three years in the period ended October 2, 1999, as set forth in their report which is included in this prospectus and elsewhere in the registration statement. Ernst & Young LLP have also audited our consolidated financial statements and schedule included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended October 2, 1999, as set forth in their report, which is incorporated by reference in this prospectus and elsewhere in the registration statement. We have both included our consolidated financial statements and incorporated by reference our consolidated financial statements and schedule in this prospectus and elsewhere in the registration statement in reliance on Ernst & Young LLP's reports, given on their authority as experts in accounting and auditing. WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION We file annual, quarterly and special reports, proxy statements and other information with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or the SEC. You may read and copy any document we file at the public reference facilities of the SEC located at 450 Fifth Street, N.W., Washington D.C. 20549. You may obtain information on the operation of the SEC's public reference facilities by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. You can also access copies of such material electronically on the SEC's home page on the World Wide Web at http://www.sec.gov. This prospectus is part of a registration statement (Registration No. 333-94793) we filed with the SEC. The SEC permits us to "incorporate by reference" the information that we file with them, which means that we can disclose important information to you by referring you to those documents. The information incorporated by reference is considered to be part of this prospectus, and information that we file with the SEC after the date of this prospectus will automatically update and supersede this information. We incorporate by reference the following documents filed by us with the SEC (File No. 000-20225). We also incorporate by reference any future filings made with the SEC under Sections 13(a), 13(c), 14 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, after the date of this prospectus until the termination of this offering: 1. Our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 2, 1999. 2. Our Proxy Statement dated January 10, 2000 filed in connection with our Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on February 8, 2000. 3. The description of our common stock which is contained in our registration statement on Form 8-A filed under the Exchange Act on May 15, 1992, including any amendments or reports filed for the purpose of updating such description. If you request a copy of any or all of the documents incorporated by reference, we will send to you the copies requested at no charge. However, we will not send exhibits to such documents, unless such exhibits are specifically incorporated by reference in such documents. You should direct requests for such copies to: Zoll Medical Corporation, 32 Second Avenue, Burlington, Massachusetts 01803, Attention: Chief Financial Officer. Our telephone number is (781) 229-0020. 41
424B446th Page of 67TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 46th
[THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]
424B447th Page of 67TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 47th
ZOLL MEDICAL CORPORATION CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTENTS [Download Table] Report of Independent Auditors.............................. F-2 Consolidated Balance Sheets................................. F-3 Consolidated Income Statements.............................. F-4 Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity............. F-5 Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows....................... F-6 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.................. F-7 F-1
424B448th Page of 67TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 48th
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS Board of Directors and Stockholders ZOLL Medical Corporation We have audited the consolidated balance sheets of ZOLL Medical Corporation as of October 2, 1999 and September 26, 1998 and the related consolidated statements of income, shareholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended October 2, 1999. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the management of ZOLL Medical Corporation. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, based on our audits, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of ZOLL Medical Corporation at October 2, 1999 and September 26, 1998, and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended October 2, 1999, after giving retroactive effect to the merger of Pinpoint Technologies, Inc., as described in the notes to the consolidated financial statements, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. ERNST & YOUNG LLP Boston, Massachusetts November 12, 1999 F-2
424B449th Page of 67TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 49th
ZOLL MEDICAL CORPORATION CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA) [Enlarge/Download Table] SEPTEMBER 26, OCTOBER 2, JANUARY 1, 1998 1999 2000 ------------- ---------- ------------ (UNAUDITED) ASSETS Current assets: Cash and cash equivalents............................. $ 5,521 $ 1,821 $ 1,284 Accounts receivable, less allowance of $940 at September 30, 1998, $2,096 at October 2, 1999 and $2,439 at January 1, 2000.......................... 14,630 25,464 26,265 Inventories: Raw materials...................................... 3,990 5,332 6,604 Work-in-process.................................... 1,735 2,623 3,295 Finished goods..................................... 3,680 5,241 5,605 ------- ------- ------- 9,405 13,196 15,504 Prepaid expenses and other current assets............. 3,257 2,296 2,371 ------- ------- ------- Total current assets.................................... 32,813 42,777 45,424 Property and equipment at cost: Land and building..................................... 1,032 3,432 3,437 Machinery and equipment............................... 12,791 15,382 16,476 Construction in progress.............................. 1,162 477 412 Tooling............................................... 2,225 2,695 2,979 Furniture and fixtures................................ 712 883 931 Leasehold improvements................................ 737 737 749 ------- ------- ------- 18,659 23,606 24,984 Less accumulated depreciation........................... 8,187 10,875 11,637 ------- ------- ------- Net property and equipment.............................. 10,472 12,731 13,347 Other assets, net of accumulated amortization of $496 at September 26, 1998, $711 at October 2, 1999 and $771 at January 1, 2000.................................... 3,371 4,179 4,249 ------- ------- ------- $46,656 $59,687 $63,020 ======= ======= ======= LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY Current liabilities: Accounts payable...................................... $ 2,902 $ 8,404 $ 9,636 Accrued expenses and other liabilities................ 7,724 6,389 6,168 Current maturities of long-term debt.................. 116 164 163 Deferred revenue...................................... 393 1,092 1,017 ------- ------- ------- Total current liabilities............................... 11,135 16,049 16,984 Deferred income taxes................................... 288 347 347 Long-term debt.......................................... 446 2,069 2,029 Commitments and contingencies Stockholders' equity: Preferred stock, $.01 par value, authorized 1,000 shares, none issued and outstanding................ -- -- -- Common stock, $.02 par value, authorized 19,000 shares, 6,602, 6,772 and 6,844 issued and outstanding at September 26, 1998, October 2, 1999 and January 1, 2000, respectively.................. 132 136 137 Capital in excess of par value........................ 20,683 22,439 23,697 Retained earnings..................................... 13,972 18,647 19,826 ------- ------- ------- Total stockholders' equity.............................. 34,787 41,222 43,660 ------- ------- ------- $46,656 $59,687 $63,020 ======= ======= ======= See notes to consolidated financial statements. F-3
424B450th Page of 67TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 50th
ZOLL MEDICAL CORPORATION CONSOLIDATED INCOME STATEMENTS [Enlarge/Download Table] YEAR ENDED THREE MONTHS ENDED -------------------------------------------- -------------------------- SEPTEMBER 27, SEPTEMBER 26, OCTOBER 2, JANUARY 2, JANUARY 1, 1997 1998 1999 1999 2000 ------------- ------------- ---------- ----------- ----------- (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA) (UNAUDITED) Net sales....................... $57,833 $57,520 $78,682 $16,056 $24,435 Cost of goods sold.............. 25,372 24,268 32,486 6,532 10,843 ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- Gross profit.................... 32,461 33,252 46,196 9,524 13,592 Expenses: Selling and marketing......... 18,484 20,152 24,364 5,415 7,674 General and administrative.... 6,749 6,239 7,422 1,630 1,952 Research and development...... 6,430 6,583 6,916 1,603 1,731 ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- Total expenses.................. 31,663 32,974 38,702 8,648 11,357 ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- Income from operations.......... 798 278 7,494 876 2,235 Investment income............... 432 487 124 78 10 Interest expense................ 77 74 169 12 80 ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- Income before income taxes...... 1,153 691 7,449 942 2,165 Provision for income taxes...... 266 18 2,010 240 801 ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- Net income...................... $ 887 $ 673 $ 5,439 $ 702 $ 1,364 ======= ======= ======= ======= ======= Basic earnings per common share......................... $ 0.13 $ 0.10 $ 0.82 $ 0.11 $ 0.20 ======= ======= ======= ======= ======= Weighted average common shares outstanding................... 6,602 6,602 6,656 6,628 6,794 Diluted earnings per common and equivalent share.............. $ 0.13 $ 0.10 $ 0.79 $ 0.10 $ 0.19 ======= ======= ======= ======= ======= Weighted average common and equivalent shares outstanding................... 6,650 6,647 6,893 6,730 7,196 UNAUDITED PRO FORMA INFORMATION (NOTE B): [Enlarge/Download Table] Historical income before income taxes............................. $ 7,449 $ 942 Pro forma incremental operating costs........................... 272 65 ------- ------- Pro forma income before income taxes............................ 7,177 877 Pro forma provision for income taxes............................ 2,402 300 ------- ------- Pro forma net income............................................ $ 4,775 $ 577 ======= ======= Pro forma diluted earnings per share............................ $ 0.69 $ 0.09 ======= ======= See notes to consolidated financial statements. F-4
424B451st Page of 67TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 51st
ZOLL MEDICAL CORPORATION CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY [Enlarge/Download Table] CAPITAL IN TOTAL COMMON EXCESS OF RETAINED STOCKHOLDERS' SHARES AMOUNT PAR VALUE EARNINGS EQUITY ------ ------ ---------- -------- ------------- (IN THOUSANDS) BALANCE AT SEPTEMBER 28, 1996.............. 6,543 $131 $20,533 $12,950 $33,614 Exercise of stock options................ 18 59 59 Tax benefit realized upon exercise of stock options......................... 43 43 Distributions by Pinpoint Technologies, Inc................................... (140) (140) Net income............................... 887 887 ----- ---- ------- ------- ------- BALANCE AT SEPTEMBER 27, 1997.............. 6,561 131 20,635 13,697 34,463 Issuance of common stock by Pinpoint Technologies, Inc. (See Note A)....... 41 1 48 49 Adjustments to conform pooled companies fiscal year-ends...................... (140) (140) Distributions by Pinpoint Technologies, Inc................................... (258) (258) Net income............................... 673 673 ----- ---- ------- ------- ------- BALANCE AT SEPTEMBER 26, 1998.............. 6,602 132 20,683 13,972 34,787 Exercise of stock options................ 147 3 1,129 1,132 Tax benefit realized upon exercise of stock options......................... 628 628 Initial capitalization of Pinpoint Property Management, LLC (See Note A).................................... 23 1 (1) -- Contributions by Pinpoint Technologies, Inc. shareholders..................... 550 550 Distribution by Pinpoint Technologies, Inc................................... (1,314) (1,314) Net income............................... 5,439 5,439 ----- ---- ------- ------- ------- BALANCE AT OCTOBER 2, 1999................. 6,772 $136 $22,439 $18,647 $41,222 Exercise of stock options (unaudited).... 69 1 537 538 Tax benefit realized upon exercise of stock options (unaudited)............. 644 644 Stock compensation (unaudited)........... 3 77 77 Distribution by Pinpoint Technologies, Inc. (unaudited)...................... (185) (185) Net income (unaudited)................... 1,364 1,364 ----- ---- ------- ------- ------- BALANCE AT JANUARY 1, 2000 (UNAUDITED)..... 6,844 $137 $23,697 $19,826 $43,660 ===== ==== ======= ======= ======= See notes to consolidated financial statements. F-5
424B452nd Page of 67TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 52nd
ZOLL MEDICAL CORPORATION CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS [Enlarge/Download Table] YEAR ENDED THREE MONTHS ENDED ------------------------------------------ ----------------------- SEPTEMBER 27, SEPTEMBER 26, OCTOBER 2, JANUARY 2, JANUARY 1, 1997 1998 1999 1999 2000 ------------- ------------- ---------- ---------- ---------- (IN THOUSANDS) (UNAUDITED) Operating activities: Net income.................................. $ 887 $ 673 $ 5,439 $ 702 $ 1,364 Charges not affecting cash: Depreciation and amortization............... 1,418 1,478 3,035 723 886 Issuance of common stock for services....... -- 49 1,294 -- -- Accounts receivable allowances.............. 361 243 -- (24) (343) Inventory reserve........................... 318 53 129 (2) (32) Provision for warranty expense.............. 275 (43) 180 22 (6) Deferred income taxes....................... (898) 188 (339) -- -- In-process research and development......... 1,000 -- -- -- -- Changes in current assets and liabilities: Accounts receivable......................... 1,102 114 (12,129) (2,562) (458) Inventories................................. (408) (1,982) (3,920) (1,381) (2,276) Prepaid expenses and other current assets... (23) (1,715) 1,358 1,572 (79) Accounts payable and accrued expenses(2).... 1,739 1,133 4,556 (994) 1,021 Deferred revenue............................ 116 79 130 (150) (75) ------- ------- -------- ------- ------- Cash provided by (used for) operating activities.................................. 5,887 270 (267) (2,094) 2 Investing activities: Additions to property and equipment......... (1,801) (4,493) (2,930) (1,135) (1,442) Investment in marketable securities......... (2,575) (2,675) (419) -- (1,096) Redemption of marketable securities......... 5,262 2,953 419 -- 1,096 Other assets................................ (166) (62) (1,002) (14) (53) Acquisition of assets from Westech Information Systems, Inc.................. (1,558) (3) -- -- -- ------- ------- -------- ------- ------- Cash used for investing activities............ (838) (4,280) (3,932) (1,149) (1,495) Financing activities: Exercise of stock options, including income tax benefits.............................. 102 -- 1,760 68 1,182 Distributions to stockholders............... (140) (258) (1,314) -- (185) Contributions from stockholders............. -- -- 550 -- -- Repayment of long-term debt................. (160) (127) (497) (41) (41) ------- ------- -------- ------- ------- Cash provided by (used for) financing activities.................................... (198) (385) 499 27 956 ------- ------- -------- ------- ------- Net increase (decrease) in cash............... 4,851 (4,395) (3,700) (3,216) (537) Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year(1)..................................... 5,107 9,916 5,521 5,521 1,821 ------- ------- -------- ------- ------- Cash and cash equivalents at end of year...... $ 9,958 $ 5,521 $ 1,821 $ 2,305 $ 1,284 ======= ======= ======== ======= ======= --------------- (1) Pinpoint Technologies, Inc.'s December 31 year-end was changed to conform with ZOLL Medical Corporation's September 26, 1998 year-end (see Note A) (2) Includes payment of approximately $880,000 of accounts payable during the first quarter of fiscal 2000 related to the 1999 purchase of our new Enterprise Resource Planning information technology system from Oracle Corporation. [Enlarge/Download Table] SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION: Cash paid during the year: Income taxes................................ $ 551 $ 1,002 $ 555 $ 44 $ 431 Interest.................................... 77 74 169 12 80 Non-cash transaction: Long-term debt incurred in purchase of assets.................................... $ 1,800 See notes to consolidated financial statements. F-6
424B453rd Page of 67TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 53rd
ZOLL MEDICAL CORPORATION NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS NOTE A -- SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES Description of Business: ZOLL Medical Corporation (the Company) designs, manufactures and markets an integrated line of proprietary, non-invasive cardiac resuscitation devices and disposable electrodes. The Company's products are used for the emergency resuscitation of cardiac arrest victims. The Company also designs and markets software, which automates collection and management of both clinical and non-clinical data for emergency medical service providers. Basis of Presentation: On October 15, 1999, the Company acquired Pinpoint Technologies, Inc. and Pinpoint Property Management LLC (Pinpoint individually and collectively) in a business combination accounted for as a pooling of interests. Pinpoint, which creates, develops and manufactures advanced information technology software, exclusively focused on the emergency medical services (EMS)market, became a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company through the exchange of approximately 433,000 shares of the company's common stock for all of the outstanding stock of Pinpoint. In January 1999, Pinpoint distributed cash to the stockholders of Pinpoint. All of the cash distributed was contributed to newly formed Pinpoint Property Management LLC, and used to fund the equity needed to acquire an office building (See Note G). The accompanying consolidated financial statements are presented on the basis that the companies were combined for all periods presented, and financial statements of prior years have been restated to give effect to the combination. Prior to the combination, Pinpoint had a December 31 fiscal year end. Subsequent to the combination Pinpoint changed its year-end to the Saturday closest to September 30, to conform with that of the Company. The accompanying consolidated financial statements reflect the combined historical results of the Company for the periods ended September 27, 1997, September 26, 1998 and October 2, 1999, and the results of Pinpoint for December 31, 1997, September 26, 1998, and October 2, 1999. An adjustment for $140,000 was reflected in the Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity to eliminate the effect of including Pinpoint's results of operations for the three months ended December 31, 1997, in both the years ended September 27, 1997 and September 26, 1998. Unaudited Interim Financial Statements: The Consolidated Balance Sheet as of January 1, 2000, the Consolidated Income Statements for the three months ended January 1, 2000 and January 2, 1999, and the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the three months ended January 1, 2000 and January 2, 1999 are unaudited, but in the opinion of management include all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring items, necessary for a fair presentation of results for these interim periods. The results for the interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the entire year. Principles of Consolidation: The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries and Pinpoint Technologies, Inc. and Pinpoint Property Management LLC. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated. Fiscal Year: The Company's fiscal year ends on the Saturday closest to September 30. The year ended October 2, 1999 included 53 weeks and the years ended September 26, 1998 and September 27, 1997 included 52 weeks. Cash and Cash Equivalents: The Company considers all highly liquid instruments with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents. Substantially all cash and cash equivalents are invested in a money market investment account. These amounts are stated at cost which approximates market. Inventories: Inventories, principally purchased parts, are valued at the lower of first-in, first-out (FIFO) cost or market. Market is replacement value for raw materials and net realizable value, after allowance for estimated costs of completion and disposal, for work-in-process and finished goods. F-7
424B454th Page of 67TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 54th
ZOLL MEDICAL CORPORATION NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) Intangible Assets: Patents and software are stated at cost and amortized using the straight-line method. The excess of cost over fair value of the net assets acquired is amortized on a straight-line basis over 15 years. Prepaid license fees are amortized over the term of the related contract, once commercialization of the related product begins. Property and Equipment: Property and equipment are stated at cost and are depreciated using the straight-line method over the estimated economic useful lives of the assets (forty years for buildings, three to ten years for machinery and equipment, and five to seven years for tooling and furniture and fixtures). Leasehold improvements and equipment under capital leases are being amortized over the life of the lease. Revenue Recognition: Revenue from product sales is recognized upon shipment of the product and recorded net of estimated returns. The Company licenses software under the non-cancelable license agreements and provides services including training, installation, consulting and maintenance, consisting of product support services and periodic updates. Revenue from the sale of software is recognized in accordance with the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) Statement of Position (SOP) 97-2, Software Revenue Recognition. License fee revenues are generally recognized when a non- cancelable license agreement has been signed, the software product has been shipped, there are no uncertainties surrounding product acceptance, the fees are fixed and determinable, and collection is considered probable. For customer license agreements, which meet these recognition criteria, the portion of the fees related to software licenses will generally be recognized in the current period, while the portion of the fees related to services is recognized as the services are performed. The Company allocates a portion of contractual license fees to post-contract support activities covered under the contract including first year maintenance, installation assistance and limited training services. In addition, the Company also allocates a portion of the contractual license fees to future unspecified upgrade rights. Revenues from maintenance agreements and upgrade rights are recognized ratably over a three month period, and a one year period, respectively. Advertising Costs: Advertising costs are expensed as incurred and totaled $381,000, $409,000 and $481,000 in 1997, 1998 and 1999, respectively. Product Warranty: Expected future product warranty costs, included in accrued expenses and other liabilities, are recognized at the time of sale for all products covered under warranty. Warranty periods range from one to five years. Foreign Currency: The financial position and results of operations of the Company's foreign subsidiaries are measured using the U.S. dollar as the functional currency. All material translation and transaction gains and losses are recorded in the income statement. Earnings Per Share: In 1998, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 128, "Earnings per Share," which requires the presentation of basic and diluted earnings per share amounts. All periods presented have been restated to reflect adoption of this statement. The shares used for basic earnings per common share and diluted earnings per common share are reconciled as follows (in thousands): [Enlarge/Download Table] THREE MONTHS ENDED ------------------------ JANUARY 2, JANUARY 1, 1997 1998 1999 1999 2000 ----- ----- ----- ---------- ---------- Average shares outstanding for basic earnings per share.................. 6,602 6,602 6,656 6,628 6,794 Dilutive effect of stock options...... 48 45 237 102 402 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Average shares outstanding for diluted earnings per share.................. 6,650 6,647 6,893 6,730 7,196 ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== F-8
424B455th Page of 67TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 55th
ZOLL MEDICAL CORPORATION NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) Reclassifications: Certain reclassifications have been made to the prior years' consolidated financial statements to conform to the 2000 presentation. Use of Estimates: The preparation of the financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Stock Option Plans: The Company accounts for its stock compensation awards under the provisions of APB No. 25, "Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees," and will continue to do so in the future. Segment Reporting: Effective October 2, 1999, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 131, "Disclosure about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information" (SFAS 131). This statement supersedes Statement No. 14, "Financial Reporting for Segments of a Business Enterprise." SFAS 131 establishes standards for the way that public companies report information about operating segments in annual financial statements and requires that those enterprises report selected information about operating segments in interim financial reports. SFAS 131 also establishes standards for disclosures about products and services, geographic areas and major customers. The adoption of SFAS 131 did not affect results of operations or financial position, but did affect the disclosure of segment information. See Note N. Comprehensive Income: In June 1997, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 130, "Reporting Comprehensive Income." SFAS 130 establishes standards for reporting and displaying comprehensive income. Comprehensive income is equal to net income for each fiscal year presented. Recent Accounting Pronouncements: In June 1998, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 133, "Accounting for Derivative Financial Instruments and for Hedging Activities," which provides a comprehensive and consistent standard for the recognition and measurement of derivatives and hedging activities. SFAS 133 is effective for years beginning after June 15, 2000 and is not anticipated to have a material effect on the Company's financial statements when adopted. NOTE B -- MERGER: Summarized results of operations of the separate companies for the preceding three years are as follows (in thousands): [Download Table] ZOLL PINPOINT COMBINED ------- -------- -------- Year ended September 27, 1997 Net sales........................................... $56,336 $1,497 $57,833 Net income.......................................... 515 372 887 Year ended September 26, 1998 Net sales........................................... $55,080 $2,440 $57,520 Net income.......................................... 43 630 673 Year ended October 2, 1999 Net sales........................................... $73,977 $4,705 $78,682 Net income.......................................... 4,081 1,358 5,439 Sales and net income of $579,000 and $140,000, respectively, for the quarter ended December 31, 1997 were included in the years ended September 27, 1997 and September 26, 1998. F-9
424B456th Page of 67TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 56th
ZOLL MEDICAL CORPORATION NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) The following unaudited pro forma information has been prepared assuming Pinpoint had been acquired as of the beginning of the periods presented. The pro forma information is presented for informational purposes only and is not necessarily indicative of what would have occurred if the acquisition had been made as of those dates. In addition, the pro forma information is not intended to be a projection of future results and does not reflect synergies expected to result from the integration of Pinpoint and the Company's Westech business. The pro forma income tax adjustment assumes Pinpoint was a taxable entity subject to tax at ZOLL's incremental tax rate for the periods presented. The pro forma operating costs are expected to be incurred as a result of the merger. [Download Table] 1997 1998 1999 ---- ---- ------ (IN THOUSANDS) Combined net income......................................... $887 $673 $5,439 Pro forma income tax adjustment on Pinpoint's S Corporation earnings.................................................. 149 248 392 Pro forma incremental operating costs....................... -- -- 272 ---- ---- ------ Pro forma net income........................................ $738 $425 $4,775 ==== ==== ====== NOTE C -- INVESTMENTS During 1996, the Company invested $2 million in the common stock of Lifecor, Inc., which represents approximately 6% of Lifecor's outstanding common stock. The Company accounts for this investment at cost, which approximates market. This investment is included in other assets on the balance sheet. NOTE D -- PREPAID EXPENSES AND OTHER CURRENT ASSETS Current assets consisted of: [Enlarge/Download Table] SEPTEMBER 26, OCTOBER 2, 1998 1999 ------------- ---------- (IN THOUSANDS) Deferred income taxes....................................... $1,124 $1,522 Insurance proceeds receivable -- See Note L................. 1,674 -- Other....................................................... 459 774 ------ ------ Total prepaid expenses and other current assets............. $3,257 $2,296 ====== ====== NOTE E -- STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY Preferred Stock: The Board of Directors is authorized to fix the designations, relative rights, preferences and limitations on the Preferred Stock at the time of issuance. On June 8, 1998, the Company's Board of Directors adopted a Shareholder Rights Plan. In connection with the Shareholder Rights Plan, the Board of Directors declared a dividend distribution of one Preferred Stock purchase right for each outstanding share of Common Stock to stockholders of record as of the close of business day on June 9, 1998. Initially, these rights will not be exercisable and will trade with the shares of the Company's Common Stock. Under the Shareholder Rights Plan, the rights generally become exercisable if a person becomes an "acquiring person" by acquiring 15% or more of the Common Stock of the Company, if a person who owns 10% or more of the Common Stock of the Company is determined to be an "adverse person" by the Board of Directors or if a person commences a tender offer F-10
424B457th Page of 67TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 57th
ZOLL MEDICAL CORPORATION NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) that would result in that person owning 15% or more of the Common Stock of the Company. Under the Shareholder Rights Plan, a shareholder of the Company who beneficially owns 15% or more of the Company's Common Stock as of June 9, 1998 generally will be deemed an "acquiring person" if such shareholder acquires additional shares of the Company's Common Stock. In the event that a person becomes an "acquiring person" or is declared an "adverse person" by the Board, each holder of a right (other than the acquiring person or the adverse person) would be entitled to acquire such number of shares of Preferred Stock which are equivalent to the Company's Common Stock having a value of twice the then-current exercise price of the right. If the Company is acquired in a merger or other business combination transaction after any such event, each holder of a right would then be entitled to purchase, at the then-current exercise price, shares of the acquiring company's common stock having a value twice the exercise price of the right. Stock Purchase Rights: On September 25, 1995, Pinpoint granted an employee stock purchase rights which entitled the employee to obtain 3% of the then existing shares at a nominal price. The stock purchase rights vest 25% at the end of one year of employment, another 25% vesting over the next three years, and the remaining 50% vesting over the next six years. The rights to purchase 12,650 shares of common stock automatically vested upon the acquisition of Pinpoint. As of October 2, 1999, none of the stock purchase rights had been exercised. Stock Option Plans: The Company's 1983 and 1992 stock option plans provide for the granting of options to officers and other key employees to purchase the Company's Common Stock at a purchase price, in the case of incentive stock options, at least equal to the fair market value per share of the outstanding Common Stock of the Company at the time the option is granted, as determined by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors. Options are no longer granted under the 1983 plan. The options become exercisable ratably over two or four years and have maximum duration of 10 years. The Company's Non-employee Director Stock Option Plan provides for the granting of options to purchase shares of Common Stock to Directors of the Company who are not also employees of the Company or any subsidiary of the Company. The options vest in four equal annual installments over a four year period. The options may be exercised at a price equal to the fair market value of the Common Stock on the date the option is granted. The number of shares authorized for these plans was 2,210,000. Approximately 1,208,000 shares of Common Stock are reserved for issuance under the Company's stock option plans as of October 2, 1999. The Company has adopted the disclosure-only provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 (FAS 123), "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation." Accordingly, no compensation cost has been recognized with respect to the Company's stock option grants. Had compensation cost for this plan been determined based on the fair value methodology prescribed by FAS 123, the Company's net earnings and earnings per share would have been reduced to the pro forma amounts indicated below. [Enlarge/Download Table] 1997 1998 1999 -------- -------- --------- (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA) Net income -- as reported.................................. $ 887 $ 673 $5,439 Net income -- pro forma.................................... 641 313 4,956 Basic earnings per common and equivalent share-as reported................................................. $0.13 $0.10 $ 0.82 Diluted earnings per common and equivalent share-as reported................................................. $0.13 $0.10 $ 0.79 Basic earnings per common and equivalent share-pro forma... $0.10 $0.05 $ 0.74 Diluted earnings per common and equivalent share-pro forma.................................................... $0.10 $0.05 $ 0.72 F-11
424B458th Page of 67TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 58th
ZOLL MEDICAL CORPORATION NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) The above pro forma amounts may not be representative of the effects on reported net earnings for future years. The fair value of each option grant is estimated on the date of the grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions used for grants in 1999 and 1998: [Download Table] 1997 1998 1999 ------- ------- ------- Dividend yield.......................................... 0% 0% 0% Expected volatility..................................... 4.84% 6.48% 6.56% Risk-free interest rate................................. 5.98% 4.53% 5.11% Expected lives.......................................... 5 years 5 years 5 years Activity as to stock options under the two plans is as follows: [Enlarge/Download Table] 1997 1998 1999 ------------------ ------------------ ------------------ WEIGHTED- WEIGHTED- WEIGHTED- AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE EXERCISE EXERCISE EXERCISE SHARES PRICE SHARES PRICE SHARES PRICE ------ --------- ------ --------- ------ --------- (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA) Outstanding at beginning of year............ 731 $11.19 793 $11.02 909 $ 7.23 Granted during the year..................... 86 9.76 214 7.08 253 10.11 Exercised during the year................... (18) 3.43 -- -- (147) 7.70 Cancelled during the year................... (6) 12.55 (98) 9.05 (149) 6.06 ---- ------ --- ------ ---- ------ Outstanding at end of year.................. 793 $11.02 909 $ 7.23 866 $ 7.98 ---- ------ --- ------ ---- ------ Available for grant at end of year.......... 161 145 341 ---- --- ---- Weighted-average fair value of options granted during the year................... $ 4.48 $ 4.12 $ 6.83 Weighted-average exercise price of options exercisable at end of year................ $10.08 $ 7.20 $ 7.14 The following table summarizes information about stock options outstanding at October 2, 1999. [Enlarge/Download Table] OPTIONS OUTSTANDING OPTIONS EXERCISABLE ----------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------- NUMBER WEIGHTED-AVERAGE NUMBER OUTSTANDING AT REMAINING WEIGHTED-AVERAGE EXERCISABLE AT WEIGHTED-AVERAGE RANGE OF EXERCISE PRICE OCTOBER 2, 1999 CONTRACTUAL LIFE EXERCISE PRICE OCTOBER 2, 1999 EXERCISE PRICE ----------------------- --------------- ---------------- ---------------- --------------- ---------------- (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA) $3.687 - $6.875 429 7.54 Years $ 6.54 142 $5.89 $7.000 - $8.750 248 7.76 Years 8.27 95 8.50 $9.000 - $10.000 72 7.92 Years 9.60 18 9.77 $10.750 - $12.313 117 9.66 Years 11.70 -- -- --- --- $3.687 - $12.313 866 255 === === Under the Company's 1992 stock option plan, 417,850 options ranging in option price from $10.00 to $14.75 per share were repriced to $6.88 per share during 1998. This repricing was accomplished by canceling the existing options and issuing new options at new prices with vesting schedules recommencing as of the date of reprice. The purpose of this transaction was to restore the incentive effect of such options. In all other respects, the Plan remained unchanged. F-12
424B459th Page of 67TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 59th
ZOLL MEDICAL CORPORATION NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) NOTE F -- ACCRUED EXPENSES AND OTHER LIABILITIES Accrued liabilities consist of: [Enlarge/Download Table] SEPTEMBER 26, OCTOBER 2, 1998 1999 ------------- ---------- (IN THOUSANDS) Accrued salaries and wages and related expenses............. $3,375 $2,588 Accrued warranty expense.................................... 953 1,133 Accrued income taxes........................................ -- 1,164 Accrued shareholder litigation settlement cost -- see Note L......................................................... 1,400 -- Other accrued expenses...................................... 1,996 2,073 ------ ------ Total accrued expenses and other liabilities................ $7,724 $6,958 ====== ====== NOTE G -- INDEBTEDNESS The Company maintains an unsecured working capital line of credit with its bank. This line of credit bears interest at the bank's base rate (8.5% at October 2, 1999 and September 26, 1998). The full amount of the line ($6.0 million) was available to the Company at October 2, 1999. On November 5, 1999, the Company increased its line of credit to $12.0 million. In 1994, the Company purchased land and building, which replaced leased operating facilities, for $900,000. The land and building are mortgaged under a $900,000 bank note bearing interest at 8.2%. The carrying value of the land and building at September 26, 1998 and October 2, 1999 amounted to $948,000 and $915,000, respectively. The mortgage requires equal monthly principal payments of $7,500 plus interest over seven years, with a final payment of $270,000 due in July 2001. The carrying amount of the long-term debt approximates the fair value. The mortgage contains various covenants including minimum levels of net worth, working capital and pre-tax earnings. The Company is in compliance with all covenants of the agreement. As of October 2, 1999 the outstanding balance of the note amounted to approximately $442,000. Also, included in long-term debt is a promissory note (the Note) entered into in March 1999 by Pinpoint in order to acquire an office building. The Note bears interest at 7.95% per annum, is due in monthly installments of approximately $18,000 with final payment due March 2014. As of October 2, 1999 the outstanding balance of the Note amounted to approximately $1,791,000. Long-term debt consisted of: [Enlarge/Download Table] SEPTEMBER 26, OCTOBER 2, 1998 1999 ------------- ---------- (IN THOUSANDS) Mortgage note payable....................................... $533 $2,233 Capital lease obligations................................... 29 -- ---- ------ Total long-term debt........................................ 562 2,233 Less current portion........................................ 116 164 ---- ------ $446 $2,069 ==== ====== F-13
424B460th Page of 67TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 60th
ZOLL MEDICAL CORPORATION NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) The schedule of principal payments on long term debt is as follows: [Download Table] 2000................................................ $ 164 2001................................................ 435 2002................................................ 90 2003................................................ 98 2004................................................ 106 Thereafter.......................................... 1,340 ------ $2,233 ====== NOTE H -- INCOME TAXES The provision for income taxes consists of the following: [Download Table] 1997 1998 1999 ----- ----- ------ (IN THOUSANDS) Federal: Current................................................. $ 942 $(277) $1,941 Deferred................................................ (722) 194 (58) ----- ----- ------ 220 (83) 1,883 State: Current................................................. 222 107 370 Deferred................................................ (176) (6) (18) ----- ----- ------ 46 101 352 Foreign: Current................................................. -- -- 37 Deferred................................................ -- -- (262) ----- ----- ------ -- -- (225) ----- ----- ------ $ 266 $ 18 $2,010 ===== ===== ====== The following table shows income before income taxes: [Download Table] 1997 1998 1999 ------ ----- ------ (IN THOUSANDS) Domestic.................................................. $1,137 $ 821 $6,479 Foreign................................................... 16 (130) 970 ------ ----- ------ $1,153 $ 691 $7,449 ====== ===== ====== F-14
424B461st Page of 67TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 61st
ZOLL MEDICAL CORPORATION NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) The income taxes recorded differed from the statutory federal income tax rate due to: [Download Table] 1997 1998 1999 ---- ---- ------ (IN THOUSANDS) Statutory income taxes...................................... $265 $ 21 $2,132 Tax credits, federal and state.............................. -- -- (48) State income taxes, net of federal benefit.................. 31 32 229 Unbenefitted (benefitted) foreign losses.................... 13 -- (262) Permanent differences....................................... (20) 35 35 Other....................................................... (23) (70) (76) ---- ---- ------ $266 $ 18 $2,010 ==== ==== ====== Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes. The valuation allowance decreased $262,000 as a result of the utilization of foreign net operating losses. Significant components of the Company's deferred tax assets and liabilities are as follows: [Enlarge/Download Table] SEPTEMBER 26, OCTOBER 2, 1998 1999 ------------- ---------- (IN THOUSANDS) Deferred tax assets: Accounts receivable and inventory......................... $ 625 $ 999 Net operating loss carryforwards.......................... 365 68 Product warranty accruals................................. 373 408 Purchased research and development........................ 336 297 Other liabilities......................................... 379 258 Valuation allowance for deferred tax assets............... (262) -- ------ ------ Total deferred tax assets.............................. 1,816 2,030 Deferred tax liabilities: Accelerated tax depreciation.............................. 731 712 Prepaid expenses.......................................... 248 143 ------ ------ Total deferred tax liabilities......................... 979 855 ------ ------ Net deferred tax asset................................. $ 837 $1,175 ====== ====== Prior to the merger Pinpoint elected to be taxed under the Subchapter S provisions of the Internal Revenue Code. Accordingly, Pinpoint's income or loss is included in the stockholders' individual income tax returns. F-15
424B462nd Page of 67TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 62nd
ZOLL MEDICAL CORPORATION NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) NOTE I -- LEASES The Company leases certain office and manufacturing space under operating leases. Listed below are the future minimum rental payments required under operating leases with non-cancelable terms in excess of one year at October 2, 1999. [Download Table] (IN THOUSANDS) 2000........................................... $ 414 2001........................................... 371 2002........................................... 353 2003........................................... 281 ------ $1,419 ====== Pinpoint is obligated under a lease agreement for formerly occupied facilities under a lease, which expires February 1, 2000. The lease provides for the Company to pay an annual base rent plus expenses, totaling approximately $43,000, which increases each year as determined by the Consumer Price Index. Effective March 11, 1999, the Company subleased this space to an unrelated company on a full-cost pass-through basis, whereby the sublease tenant pays the landlord directly. The Company remains obligated on the lease payments to the extent that the sublease tenant defaults on its payments. The Company's office leases are subject to adjustments based on actual floor space occupied. The leases also require payment of real estate taxes and operating costs. In addition to the office leases, the Company leases automobiles for business use by a portion of the sales force. Total rental expense under operating leases for 1997, 1998 and 1999 was approximately $625,000, $728,000 and $907,000, respectively. NOTE J -- EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLAN Defined contribution retirement plan -- Zoll has a defined contribution retirement plan which contains a "401(k)" program for all employees with six months of service who have attained 21 years of age. The Company may make a discretionary contribution and an additional discretionary profit sharing contribution. The Company made a $100,000 contribution to the plan in fiscal 1997, 1998 and 1999. 401(k) Salary Deferral Plan -- Beginning in 1998, Pinpoint has maintained a retirement savings plan (the Plan) pursuant to which eligible employees may defer compensation for income tax purposes under section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. Participants in the Plan may contribute up to 15% of their eligible compensation which are matched by the Company at 50% of the employee contribution up to 6% of eligible compensation. The Company may make discretionary matching contributions to the Plan in an amount determined by its Board of Directors. The Company recorded expense related to the Plan of approximately $11,000 and $29,000 for the year ended September 26, 1998 and October 2, 1999, respectively. NOTE K -- CONCENTRATION OF CREDIT RISK The Company sells its products primarily to hospitals, emergency care providers and universities. The Company performs periodic credit evaluations of its customers' financial condition and does not require collateral. In addition, the Company sells its products to the international market. Although the Company does not foresee a credit risk associated with these receivables, repayment is dependent upon the financial stability of the national economies of the customer to which it sells. In order to hedge the risk of loss in geographical areas with historical credit risks, in some cases the Company requires letters of credit from its F-16
424B463rd Page of 67TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 63rd
ZOLL MEDICAL CORPORATION NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) foreign customers. Export sales accounted for 21%, 18% and 19% of the Company's total revenues in 1997, 1998 and 1999, respectively. The Company maintains reserves for potential trade receivable credit losses, and such losses have been within management's expectations. Certain materials and components used in the Company's devices and electrodes are purchased from various single sources. Although the Company believes that alternative sources of supply for such materials and components could be developed over a relatively short period of time, the failure to secure such alternative sources when needed could have a material adverse effect on the Company's business. NOTE L -- CONTINGENCIES In the course of normal operations, the Company is involved in litigation arising from commercial disputes and claims from former employees which management believes will not have a material impact on the Company's financial position or its results of operations. During the quarter ended December 28, 1996, the Company incurred a charge of approximately $1,300,000 to cover the litigation costs to defend itself in a shareholder lawsuit initiated in 1994. On July 9, 1998, the Company announced an agreement in principle concerning the settlement of the lawsuit against it and certain officers. The settlement, amounting to $1,500,000, was approved by the court on October 5, 1998. There was no financial impact as a result of the settlement. Included in accrued expenses at September 26, 1998 is the unpaid settlement cost and remaining accrued legal fees related to the litigation. A similar amount due from the insurance company is included in other current assets at September 26, 1998. In November 1998, the Company received the insurance reimbursements for the claim and legal costs and paid the remaining settlement due to the shareholders. NOTE M -- ACQUISITION On November 6, 1996, the Company acquired the assets of the mobile computing business of Westech Information Systems, Inc. for approximately $1,500,000 in cash. The acquisition was accounted for as a purchase and the purchase price was allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their respective fair values at the date of acquisition. The excess of the cost over the fair value of net assets acquired is being amortized over fifteen years. In connection with the acquisition, the Company incurred a non-recurring charge of $1,000,000 for acquired in-process research and development which was charged to operations because in management's opinion, technological feasibility for the acquired research and development had not been established. The Company's combined results of operations include the operations of the mobile computing business of Westech Information Systems, Inc. from November 1996. The following unaudited pro forma information for fiscal year 1997 shows the results of operations as if the transaction occurred at the beginning the year of acquisition (in thousands, except per share amounts): [Download Table] Net sales................................................... $57,935 Net income.................................................. 876 Basic earnings per common share............................. $ 0.13 Diluted earnings per common and equivalent share............ $ 0.13 The pro forma results of operations are not necessarily indicative of the actual results of operations that would have occurred had the purchase actually been made at the beginning of the respective periods and is not necessarily indicative of results that may be obtained in the future. F-17
424B464th Page of 67TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 64th
ZOLL MEDICAL CORPORATION NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) NOTE N -- SEGMENT AND GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION Segment information: The Company reports revenue information to the chief operating decision maker for four operating segments, determined on the type of customer or product. These segments include the sale of cardiac resuscitation devices and accessories and data collection management software to the hospital market and to the prehospital market in North America, the sale of disposable/other products and the sale of cardiac resuscitation devices and accessories and disposable electrodes to the international market. Each of these segments has similar characteristics, manufacturing processes, distribution and marketing strategies, as well as a similar regulatory environment. In order to make operating and strategic decisions, the Company's chief operating decision maker evaluates revenue performance based on the worldwide revenues of each segment and, due to shared infrastructures, profitability based on an enterprise-wide basis. Net sales by segment were as follow: [Download Table] 1997 1998 1999 ------- ------- ------- (IN THOUSANDS) Hospital Market -- North America devices.............. $21,562 $19,962 $30,868 Pre-hospital Market -- North America devices.......... 12,721 14,914 19,115 Other -- North America................................ 11,855 12,841 15,035 International Market -- excluding North America....... 11,695 9,803 13,664 ------- ------- ------- $57,833 $57,520 $78,682 ======= ======= ======= The Company reports assets on a combined basis to the chief operating decision maker. Geographic information: Net sales by major geographical area, determined on the basis of destination of the goods, are as follow: [Download Table] 1997 1998 1999 ------- ------- ------- (IN THOUSANDS) United States......................................... $45,523 $46,952 $63,838 Foreign............................................... 12,310 10,568 14,844 ------- ------- ------- $57,833 $57,520 $78,682 ======= ======= ======= In each of the years in the three year period ended October 2, 1999, no single customer represented over 10% of the Company's combined net sales. NOTE O -- QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA (UNAUDITED) Summarized quarterly financial data for 1998 and 1999 is as follows: [Enlarge/Download Table] QUARTER ENDED ------------------------------------------------------ DECEMBER 27, MARCH 28, JUNE 27, SEPTEMBER 26, 1997 1998 1998 1998 ------------ --------- -------- ------------- (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA) 1998 Net sales.................................... $13,019 $14,354 $13,326 $16,821 Gross profit................................. 7,447 8,450 7,706 9,649 Income (loss) from operations................ 273 734 (1,148) 419 Net income (loss)............................ 305 743 (730) 355 Basic earnings (loss) per common share....... $ 0.05 $ 0.12 $ (0.12) $ 0.06 Diluted earnings (loss) per common and equivalent share........................... $ 0.05 $ 0.11 $ (0.11) $ 0.05 F-18
424B465th Page of 67TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 65th
ZOLL MEDICAL CORPORATION NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) [Enlarge/Download Table] QUARTER ENDED ----------------------------------------------- JANUARY 2, APRIL 3, JULY 3, OCTOBER 2, 1999 1999 1999 1999 ---------- -------- ------- ---------- (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA) 1999 Net sales......................................... $16,056 $17,941 $20,813 $23,872 Gross profit...................................... 9,524 10,502 12,314 13,856 Income from operations............................ 876 1,283 2,073 3,262 Net income........................................ 702 936 1,534 2,267 Basic earnings per common share................... 0.11 0.14 0.23 0.34 Diluted earnings per common and equivalent share........................................... 0.10 0.14 0.22 0.32 F-19
424B466th Page of 67TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 66th
[THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]
424B4Last Page of 67TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 67th
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1,500,000 SHARES [ZOLL LOGO] ZOLL MEDICAL CORPORATION COMMON STOCK --------------------------------- PROSPECTUS FEBRUARY 22, 2000 --------------------------------- SALOMON SMITH BARNEY U.S. BANCORP PIPER JAFFRAY ADAMS, HARKNESS & HILL, INC. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dates Referenced Herein   and   Documents Incorporated by Reference

Referenced-On Page
This ‘424B4’ Filing    Date First  Last      Other Filings
9/30/001910-K405
6/15/0055
2/28/001
Filed on:2/23/00S-3MEF
2/22/00167S-3/A
2/8/0045DEF 14A
2/1/0062
1/25/004142
1/19/0042
1/10/0045DEF 14A
1/7/0042SC 13G/A
1/1/0065310-Q
11/12/9948
11/5/9959
10/15/9922538-K,  8-K/A
10/2/99196410-K405
3/11/9962
2/11/9942SC 13G
1/7/9942
1/2/99215310-Q
10/5/9863
9/30/9849
9/26/98196310-K405
7/9/9863
6/9/985657
6/8/98568-K
12/31/975355
9/27/9775510-K
12/28/966310-Q
11/6/9663
9/28/965110-K
9/25/9557
7/16/9219
5/15/9245
 List all Filings 
Top
Filing Submission 0000950135-00-001023   –   Alternative Formats (Word / Rich Text, HTML, Plain Text, et al.)

Copyright © 2024 Fran Finnegan & Company LLC – All Rights Reserved.
AboutPrivacyRedactionsHelp — Tue., May 14, 1:26:20.2pm ET