|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| SEC Info℠ | | | Home | | | Search | | | My Interests | | | Help | | | Sign In | | | Please Sign In | |||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
As Of Filer Filing For·On·As Docs:Size Issuer Filing Agent 3/31/23 Citigroup Com’l Mtge Tr 2017-P7 10-K 12/31/22 34:17M Donnelley … Solutions/FA |
Document/Exhibit Description Pages Size 1: 10-K Annual Report HTML 390K 3: EX-33 Ex-33.1 HTML 1.18M 13: EX-33 Ex-33.12A HTML 1.95M 14: EX-33 Ex-33.12B HTML 2.01M 11: EX-33 Ex-33.14 HTML 891K 12: EX-33 Ex-33.16 HTML 279K 4: EX-33 Ex-33.2 HTML 321K 15: EX-33 Ex-33.23A HTML 736K 16: EX-33 Ex-33.23B HTML 824K 5: EX-33 Ex-33.3 HTML 1.34M 6: EX-33 Ex-33.4 HTML 53K 7: EX-33 Ex-33.5 HTML 1.56M 8: EX-33 Ex-33.7 HTML 149K 9: EX-33 Ex-33.8 HTML 36K 10: EX-33 Ex-33.9 HTML 95K 17: EX-34 Ex-34.1 HTML 20K 27: EX-34 Ex-34.12A HTML 17K 28: EX-34 Ex-34.12B HTML 20K 25: EX-34 Ex-34.14 HTML 17K 26: EX-34 Ex-34.16 HTML 159K 18: EX-34 Ex-34.2 HTML 18K 29: EX-34 Ex-34.23A HTML 20K 30: EX-34 Ex-34.23B HTML 21K 19: EX-34 Ex-34.3 HTML 1.17M 20: EX-34 Ex-34.4 HTML 16K 21: EX-34 Ex-34.5 HTML 21K 22: EX-34 Ex-34.7 HTML 23K 23: EX-34 Ex-34.8 HTML 21K 24: EX-34 Ex-34.9 HTML 23K 31: EX-35 Ex-35.1 HTML 2.36M 32: EX-35 Ex-35.2 HTML 813K 33: EX-35 Ex-35.3 HTML 92K 34: EX-35 Ex-35.4 HTML 37K 2: EX-31 Certification -- §302 - SOA'02 HTML 15K
| 10-K |
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
(Mark One)
☒ |
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2022
or
☐ |
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to __________
(Commission File Number of issuing entity)
(Central Index Key Number of issuing entity)
Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Trust 2017-P7
(Exact name of issuing entity as specified in its charter)
(Commission File Number of depositor)
(Central Index Key Number of depositor)
Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Securities Inc.
(Exact name of depositor as specified in its charter)
Citigroup Global Markets Realty Corp.
(Central Index Key Number: 0001541001)
Citi Real Estate Funding Inc.
(Central Index Key Number: 0001701238)
Natixis Real Estate Capital LLC
(Central Index Key Number: 0001542256)
Macquarie US Trading LLC d/b/a Principal Commercial Capital
(Central Index Key Number: 0001634437)
(Exact name of sponsor as specified in its charter)
New York |
|
82-1399691 82-6259785 82-6277304 |
(State or other jurisdiction of organization of the issuing entity) |
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
c/o Citibank, N.A.
388 Greenwich Street Trading, 4th Floor
(Address of principal executive offices of issuing entity)
(212) 816-5614
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of each class |
Trading Symbol(s) |
Name of each exchange on which |
None |
|
|
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None.
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities
Act. ☐ Yes ☒ No
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the
Act. ☐ Yes ☒ No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. ☒ Yes ☐ No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files).
Not Applicable
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer |
|
☐ |
|
|
Accelerated filer |
|
☐ |
|
|
|
|
||||
Non-accelerated filer |
|
☒ |
|
|
Smaller reporting company |
|
☐ |
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
Emerging growth company |
|
☐ |
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report. o
If securities are registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act, indicate by check mark whether the financial statements of the registrant included in the filing reflect the correction of an error to previously issued financial statements. o
Indicate by check mark whether any of those error corrections are restatements that required a recovery analysis of incentive-based compensation received by any of the registrant’s executive officers during the relevant recovery period pursuant to §240.10D-1(b). o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). ☐ Yes ☒ No
State the aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which the common equity was last sold, or the average bid and asked price of such common equity, as of the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter.
Not Applicable
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed all documents and reports required to be filed by Section 12, 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 subsequent to the distribution of securities under a plan confirmed by a court.
Not Applicable
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the registrant’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.
Not Applicable
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
List hereunder the following documents if incorporated by reference and the Part of the Form 10-K (e.g., Part I, Part II, etc.) into which the document is incorporated: (1) Any annual report to security holders; (2) Any proxy or information statement; and (3) Any prospectus filed pursuant to Rule 424(b) or (c) under the Securities Act of 1933. The listed documents should be clearly described for identification purposes (e.g., annual report to security holders for fiscal year ended December 24, 1980).
Not Applicable
EXPLANATORY NOTES
1 The 229 West 43rd Street Retail Condo mortgage loan, which represented approximately 2.9% of the initial pool balance of the issuing entity, is part of a loan combination comprised of the subject mortgage loan included in the issuing entity and one or more companion loan(s) that are held outside the issuing entity. The 229 West 43rd Street Retail Condo mortgage loan and the related companion loan(s) are serviced pursuant to the CD 2016-CD2 PSA.
2 The Greenwich Office Park mortgage loan, which represented approximately 2.9% of the initial pool balance of the issuing entity, is part of a loan combination comprised of the subject mortgage loan included in the issuing entity and one or more companion loan(s) that are held outside the issuing entity. The Novo Nordisk mortgage loan, which represented approximately 1.5% of the initial pool balance of the issuing entity, is part of a loan combination comprised of the subject mortgage loan included in the issuing entity and one or more companion loan(s) that are held outside the issuing entity. The Rentar Plaza mortgage loan, which represented approximately 1.2% of the initial pool balance of the issuing entity, is part of a loan combination comprised of the subject mortgage loan included in the issuing entity and one or more companion loan(s) that are held outside the issuing entity. The Greenwich Office Park mortgage loan, the Novo
Nordisk mortgage loan, the Rentar Plaza mortgage loan, and each of the related companion loan(s) are serviced pursuant to the CSMC 2016-NXSR PSA. Effective as of September 3, 2019, the directing certificateholder under the CSMC 2016-NXSR PSA removed Torchlight Loan Services, LLC as special servicer under the CSMC 2016-NXSR PSA and appointed C-III Asset Management LLC as successor special servicer under the CSMC 2016-NXSR PSA, as disclosed in the Current Report on Form 8-K dated September 3, 2019 and filed by the registrant on September 3, 2019 under Commission File No. 333-207132-11. Effective as of August
26, 2020, C-III Asset Management LLC transferred substantially all of its assets to Greystone Servicing Company LLC, and Greystone Servicing Company LLC assumed all of the duties and responsibilities of C-III Asset Management LLC as special servicer under the CSMC 2016-NXSR PSA, as disclosed in the Current Report on Form 8-K dated August 26, 2020 and filed by the registrant on August 26, 2020 under Commission File No. 333-207132-11.
3 The 111 Livingston Street mortgage loan, which represented approximately 2.8% of the initial pool balance of the issuing entity, is part of a loan combination comprised of the subject mortgage loan included in the issuing entity and one or more companion loan(s) that are held outside the issuing entity. The Parts Consolidation Center mortgage loan, which represented approximately 1.0% of the initial pool balance of the issuing entity, is part of a loan combination comprised of the subject mortgage loan included in the issuing entity and one or more companion loan(s) that are held outside the issuing entity. The 111 Livingston Street mortgage loan, the Parts Consolidation Center mortgage loan, and each of the related companion loan(s) are serviced pursuant to the CD 2017-CD3 PSA.
4 The QLIC mortgage loan, which represented approximately 2.0% of the initial pool balance of the issuing entity, is part of a loan combination comprised of the subject mortgage loan included in the issuing entity and one or more companion loan(s) that are held outside the issuing entity. The QLIC mortgage loan and the related companion loan(s) are serviced pursuant to the WFCM 2016-NXS6 PSA.
5 The Atlanta and Anchorage Hotel Portfolio mortgage loan, which represented approximately 2.7% of the initial pool balance of the issuing entity, is part of a loan combination comprised of the subject mortgage loan included in the issuing entity and one or more companion loan(s) that are held outside the issuing entity. The Atlanta and Anchorage Hotel Portfolio mortgage loan and the related companion loan(s) are serviced pursuant to the CFCRE 2017-C8 PSA.
6 The Urban Union - Amazon mortgage loan, which represented approximately 2.3% of the initial pool balance of the issuing entity, is part of a loan combination comprised of the subject mortgage loan included in the issuing entity and one or more companion loan(s) that are held outside the issuing entity. The Broadway Portfolio mortgage loan, which represented approximately 2.0% of the initial pool balance of the issuing entity, is part of a loan combination comprised of the subject mortgage loan included in the issuing entity and one or more companion loan(s) that are held outside the issuing entity. The Urban Union - Amazon mortgage loan, the Broadway Portfolio mortgage loan, and each of the related companion loan(s) are serviced pursuant to the CSAIL 2017-C8 PSA. Effective as of July 7, 2021, Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association was terminated as the special
servicer under the CSAIL 2017-C8 PSA and LNR Partners, LLC has been appointed to act as successor special servicer under the CSAIL 2017-C8 PSA, as disclosed in the Current Report on Form 8-K filed by the registrant on July 7, 2021 under Commission File No. 333-207132-11.
4
7 Pursuant to Instruction 3 to Item 1122 of Regulation AB, the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria and attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria of (i) KeyBank National Association, as special servicer for the 229 West 43rd Street Retail Condo mortgage loan under the CD 2016-CD2 PSA, (ii) Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association, as master servicer and as special servicer for the 11 Livingston Street mortgage loan and the Parts Consolidation Center mortgage loan under the CD 2017-CD3 PSA (iii) CWCapital Asset Management LLC, as special servicer for the QLIC mortgage loan under the WFCM 2016-NXS6 PSA, (iv) Trimont Real Estate Advisors, LLC, as operating advisor for the QLIC mortgage loan under the WFCM 2016-NXS6 PSA and (v) LNR Partners LLC, as special servicer for the Urban Union-Amazon mortgage loan and the Broadway Portfolio mortgage loan under the CSAIL
2017-C8 PSA, are not included in this report on Form 10-K because each of KeyBank National Association, Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association, CWCapital Asset Management LLC, Trimont Real Estate Advisors, LLC and LNR Partners, LLC performed activities that address the servicing criteria specified in Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB with respect to 5% or less of the pool assets of the issuing entity. This annual report on Form 10-K does not include the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria and attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria of Wells Fargo Bank, National Association as certificate administrator under the CD 2016-CD2 PSA, the CSMC 2016-NXSR PSA, the CD 2017-CD3 PSA, the CFCRE 2017-C8 PSA, the CSAIL 2017-C8 PSA and the WFCM 2016-NXS6 PSA, because the certificate administrator under each such pooling and servicing agreement does not perform any activities that address the servicing criteria
specified in Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB with respect to the issuing entity.
8 This annual report on Form 10-K does not include the servicer compliance statements of (i) KeyBank National Association, as special servicer for the 229 West 43rd Street Retail Condo mortgage loan under the CD 2016-CD2 PSA, (ii) Greystone Servicing Company LLC (as successor to C-III Asset Management LLC), as special servicer for the Greenwich Office Park mortgage loan, the Novo Nordisk mortgage loan, and the Rentar Plaza mortgage loan under the CSMC 2016-NXSR PSA, (iv) Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association, as master servicer and as special servicer for the 111 Livingston Street mortgage loan and the Parts Consolidation Center mortgage loan under the CD 2017-CD3 PSA, (v) LNR Partners LLC, as special servicer for the Urban Union-Amazon mortgage loan and the Broadway Portfolio mortgage loan under the CSAIL 2017-C8 PSA and (vi) CWCapital Asset Management LLC, as special servicer for the QLIC mortgage loan under the WFCM 2016-NXS6 PSA, because each of KeyBank National Association, Greystone Servicing Company LLC (as successor to C-III Asset Management LLC), Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association, LNR Partners, LLC and CWCapital Asset Management LLC is an unaffiliated party that services less than 10% of the pool assets of the issuing entity, and therefore is not a “servicer” that meets the criteria in Item 1108(a)(2)(i) through (iii) of Regulation AB. This annual report on Form 10-K does not include the servicer compliance statements of Wells Fargo Bank, National Association as certificate administrator under the CD 2016-CD2 PSA, the CSMC 2016-NXSR PSA, the CD 2017-CD3 PSA, the CFCRE 2017-C8 PSA, the CSAIL 2017-C8 PSA and the WFCM 2016-NXS6 PSA, because the certificate administrator under each such pooling and servicing agreement is not a “servicer” that meets the criteria in Item 1108(a)(2)(i) through (iii) of Regulation AB with respect to the issuing entity.
5
PART I
Item 1. Business.
Omitted.
Item 1A. Risk Factors.
Omitted.
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments.
None.
Item 2. Properties.
Omitted.
Item 3. Legal Proceedings.
Omitted.
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures.
Not applicable.
PART II
Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.
Omitted.
Item 6. [Reserved]
Omitted.
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
Omitted.
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.
Omitted.
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.
Omitted.
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.
Omitted.
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures.
Omitted.
Item 9B. Other Information.
None.
6
Item 9C. Disclosure Regarding Foreign Jurisdictions that Prevent Inspections.
Not applicable.
PART III
Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance.
Omitted.
Item 11. Executive Compensation.
Omitted.
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.
Omitted.
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence.
Omitted.
Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services.
Omitted.
ADDITIONAL DISCLOSURE ITEMS REQUIRED BY GENERAL INSTRUCTION J(2)
Item 1112(b) of Regulation AB
No mortgage loan in the pool assets for Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Trust 2017-P7 constitutes a significant obligor within the meaning of Item 1101(k)(2) of Regulation AB.
Item 1114(b)(2) and Item 1115(b) of Regulation AB
No entity or group of affiliated entities provides any external credit enhancement, uses any derivative instruments or other support for the certificates within this transaction.
Item 1117 of Regulation AB
Disclosure from Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as Trustee:
Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas (“DBTCA”) and Deutsche Bank National Trust Company (“DBNTC”) have been sued by investors in civil litigation concerning their role as trustees of certain residential mortgage-backed securities (“RMBS”) trusts.
On June 18, 2014, a group of investors, including funds managed by Blackrock Advisors, LLC, PIMCO-Advisors, L.P., and others, filed an action against DBNTC and DBTCA in New York State Supreme Court alleging that DBNTC and DBTCA failed to perform purported duties, as trustees for 544 private-label RMBS trusts, to enforce breaches of representations and warranties as to mortgage loans held by the trusts and to enforce breaches by servicers of their mortgage loan servicing obligations for the trusts. During the course of the litigation, plaintiffs dismissed the case from New York State Supreme Court and refiled two separate cases, one in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York (the “BlackRock SDNY Case”) and the other in the Superior Court of California, Orange County (the “BlackRock California Case”). Pursuant to a settlement among the parties, the BlackRock SDNY Case was dismissed on December 6, 2018, and the BlackRock California Case was dismissed on January 11, 2019.
On September 27, 2017, DBTCA was added as a defendant to a case brought by certain special purpose entities including Phoenix Light SF Limited in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, in which the plaintiffs previously alleged incorrectly that DBNTC served as trustee for all 43 of the trusts at issue. On September 27, 2017, plaintiffs filed a third amended complaint that names DBTCA as a defendant in addition to DBNTC. DBTCA serves as trustee for one of the 43 trusts at issue. DBNTC serves as trustee for the other 42 trusts at issue. Plaintiffs’ third amended complaint brings claims for violation of the U.S. Trust Indenture Act of 1939
7
(“TIA”); breach of contract; breach of fiduciary duty; negligence and gross negligence; violation of New York’s Streit Act; and breach of the covenant of good faith. However, in the third amended complaint, plaintiffs acknowledge that, before DBTCA was added to the case, the court dismissed plaintiffs’ TIA Act claims, negligence and gross negligence claims, Streit Act claims, claims for breach of the covenant of good faith, and certain theories of plaintiffs’ breach of contract claims, and plaintiffs only include these claims to preserve any rights on appeal. Plaintiffs allege damages of “hundreds of millions of dollars.” On November 13, 2017, DBNTC and DBTCA filed an answer to the third amended complaint. On December 7, 2018, DBNTC and DBTCA filed a motion for summary judgment. Also on December 7, 2018, plaintiffs, jointly with Commerzbank AG (see description of Commerzbank case below), filed a motion for partial summary judgment. On October 27, 2021, DBNTC and DBTCA filed a supplemental motion for summary judgment relating to plaintiffs’ standing. On February 8, 2022, the court issued an order in which it granted DBNTC and DBTCA’s supplemental motion for summary judgment, granted in part DBNTC and DBTCA’s initial motion for summary judgment, and denied plaintiffs’ motion for partial summary judgment. As a result of that order, all of plaintiffs’ claims were dismissed with prejudice. On March 10, 2022, plaintiffs filed a notice of appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit with respect to the court’s orders on the motions to dismiss and for summary judgment.
On November 30, 2017, DBTCA was added as a defendant to a case brought by Commerzbank AG (“Commerzbank”) in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, in which Commerzbank previously alleged incorrectly that DBNTC served as trustee for all 50 of the trusts at issue. On November 30, 2017, Commerzbank filed a second amended complaint that names DBTCA as a defendant in addition to DBNTC. DBTCA serves as trustee for 1 of the 50 trusts at issue. DBNTC serves as trustee for the other 49 trusts at issue. Commerzbank’s second amended complaint brings claims for violation of the TIA; breach of contract; breach of fiduciary duty; negligence; violation of the Streit Act; and breach of the covenant of good faith. However, in the second amended complaint, Commerzbank acknowledges that, before DBTCA was added to the case, the court dismissed Commerzbank’s TIA claims for the trusts governed by pooling and servicing agreements, as well as its Streit Act claims and claims for breach of the covenant of good faith, and Commerzbank only includes these claims to preserve any rights on appeal. The second amended complaint alleges that DBNTC and DBTCA caused Commerzbank to suffer “hundreds of millions of dollars in losses,” but the complaint does not include a demand for money damages in a sum certain. On January 29, 2018, DBNTC and DBTCA filed an answer to the second amended complaint. On December 7, 2018, DBNTC and DBTCA filed a motion for summary judgment. Also on December 7, 2018, Commerzbank, jointly with the Phoenix Light plaintiffs, filed a motion for partial summary judgment. On February 8, 2022, the court issued an order in which it granted in part DBNTC and DBTCA’s motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiffs’ motion for partial summary judgment. As a result of that order, many of plaintiffs’ claims and theories were dismissed with prejudice. Discovery is ongoing.
On December 30, 2015, IKB International, S.A. in Liquidation and IKB Deutsche Industriebank A.G. (collectively, “IKB”), as an investor in 37 RMBS trusts, filed a summons with notice in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, New York County, against DBNTC and DBTCA as trustees of the trusts. On May 27, 2016, IKB served its complaint asserting claims for breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty, breach of duty to avoid conflicts of interest, violation of the Streit Act, violation of the TIA, violation of Regulation AB, and violation of Section 9 of the Uniform Commercial Code. IKB alleges that DBNTC and DBTCA are liable for over U.S. $268 million in damages. On October 5, 2016, DBNTC and DBTCA, together with several other trustees defending lawsuits by IKB, filed a joint motion to dismiss. On January 6, 2017 and June 20, 2017, IKB voluntarily dismissed with prejudice all claims as to seven trusts. On January 27, 2021, the court granted in part and denied tin part DBNTC and DBTCA’s motion to dismiss. The court granted the motion to dismiss with respect to IKB’s claims for violations of the Streit Act, Regulation AB, and Section 9 of the Uniform Commercial Code, as well as certain aspects of IKB’s claims for breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty, and violation of the TIA. The court denied the remainder of the motion to dismiss. IKB’s remaining claims for breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty, breach of duty to avoid conflicts of interest, and violation of the TIA will proceed. On May 10, 2021, DBNTC and DBTCA filed a notice of appeal with the New York Supreme Court Appellate Division, First Department, regarding certain aspects of the court’s order on the motion to dismiss. On May 20, 2021, IKB filed a notice of cross appeal with respect to other aspects of that order. On August 30, 2022, the New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department affirmed in part and reversed in part the court’s order on the motion to dismiss. On November 10, 2022, the First Department granted DBNTC and DBTCA’s motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals, and denied IKB’s separate motion for reargument and leave to appeal. On June 2, 2021, IKB filed a motion for re-argument regarding certain aspects of the court’s order on the motion to dismiss, which the court denied on August 3, 2021. On May 13, 2021, DBNTC and DBTCA filed an answer to the complaint. On October 28, 2021, the parties filed a stipulation, voluntarily dismissing with prejudice all claims as to seven additional trusts. On December 29, 2021, the parties filed a stipulation, voluntarily dismissing with prejudice all claims as to one additional trust. On April 22, 2022, the parties filed a stipulation, voluntarily dismissing with prejudice all claims as to 17 certificates at issue (including all claims as to 5 trusts), leaving 17 trusts at issue. Discovery is ongoing.
It is DBTCA’s belief that it has no pending legal proceedings (including, based on DBTCA’s present evaluation, the litigation disclosed in the foregoing paragraphs) that would materially affect its ability to perform its duties under the related servicing agreement.
Disclosure from Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (“Wells Fargo Bank”) (i) as custodian for the 229 West 43rd Street Retail Condo mortgage loan under the CD 2016-CD2 PSA, (ii) as custodian for the Greenwich Office Park mortgage loan, the Novo Nordisk mortgage loan, and the Rentar Plaza mortgage loan under the CSMC 2016-NXSR PSA, (iii) as trustee and custodian for the 111 Livingston Street mortgage loan and the Parts Consolidation Center mortgage loan under the CD 2017-CD3 PSA, (iv) as custodian for
8
the Atlanta and Anchorage Hotel Portfolio mortgage loan under the CFCRE 2017-C8 PSA, (v) as custodian for the Urban Union - Amazon mortgage loan and the Broadway Portfolio mortgage loan under the CSAIL 2017-C8 PSA and (vi) as custodian for the QLIC mortgage loan under the WFCM 2016-NXS6 PSA:
In December 2014, Phoenix Light SF Limited (Phoenix Light) and certain related entities filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York alleging claims against Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., in its capacity as trustee for a number of residential mortgage-backed securities (RMBS) trusts. Complaints raising similar allegations have been filed by Commerzbank AG in the Southern District of New York and by IKB International and IKB Deutsche Industriebank in New York state court. In each case, the plaintiffs allege that Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as trustee, caused losses to investors, and plaintiffs assert causes of action based upon, among other things, the trustee’s alleged failure to notify and enforce repurchase obligations of mortgage loan sellers for purported breaches of representations and warranties, notify investors of alleged events of default, and abide by appropriate standards of care following alleged events of default. In July 2022, the district court dismissed Phoenix Light’s claims and certain of the claims asserted by Commerzbank AG, and subsequently entered judgment in each case in favor of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. In August 2022, Phoenix Light and Commerzbank AG appealed the district court’s decision to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. The Company previously settled two class actions filed by institutional investors and an action filed by the National Credit Union Administration with similar allegations. In addition, Park Royal I LLC and Park Royal II LLC have filed substantially similar lawsuits in New York state court alleging Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as trustee, failed to take appropriate actions upon learning of defective mortgage loan documentation.
Item 1119 of Regulation AB
Provided previously in the prospectus of the Registrant relating to the issuing entity and filed on April 18, 2017 pursuant to Rule 424(b)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.
Item 1122 of Regulation AB
The reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and related attestation reports are attached hereto under Item 15.
Item 1123 of Regulation AB
The servicer compliance statements are attached hereto under Item 15.
PART IV
Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules.
9
Exhibit Number |
Description |
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
|
4.2 |
4.3 |
|
|
|
4.4 |
4.5 |
|
|
|
4.6 |
|
|
|
4.7 |
|
|
|
31 |
10
|
|
33 |
Reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities. (see Explanatory Note #7) |
|
|
33.1 |
33.2 |
|
|
|
33.3 |
|
|
|
33.4 |
|
|
|
33.5 |
|
|
|
33.6 |
|
|
|
33.7 |
33.8 |
|
|
|
33.9 |
|
|
|
33.10 |
|
|
|
33.11 |
|
|
|
33.12a |
|
|
|
33.12b |
|
|
|
33.13 |
|
|
|
33.14 |
|
|
|
33.15 |
|
|
|
33.16 |
|
|
|
11
33.17 |
|
|
|
33.18a |
|
|
|
33.18b |
|
|
|
33.19 |
|
|
|
33.20 |
33.21 |
|
|
|
33.22a |
|
|
|
33.22b |
|
|
|
33.23a |
|
|
|
33.23b |
|
|
|
33.24 |
|
|
|
33.25a |
|
|
|
33.25b |
|
|
|
33.26 |
|
|
|
33.27 |
|
|
|
12
33.28 |
|
|
|
33.29 |
|
|
|
33.30 |
|
|
|
33.31a |
|
|
|
33.31b |
|
|
|
33.32 |
|
|
|
33.33 |
|
|
|
33.34 |
33.35 |
|
|
|
33.36a |
|
|
|
33.36b |
|
|
|
33.37 |
|
|
|
33.38 |
|
|
|
34 |
Attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities. |
|
|
34.1 |
|
|
|
34.2 |
13
|
|
34.3 |
|
|
|
34.4 |
|
|
|
34.5 |
|
|
|
34.6 |
|
|
|
34.7 |
|
|
|
34.8 |
|
|
|
34.9 |
|
|
|
34.10 |
|
|
|
34.11 |
34.12a |
|
|
|
34.12b |
|
|
|
34.13 |
|
|
|
34.14 |
|
|
|
34.15 |
|
|
|
34.16 |
|
|
|
34.17 |
|
|
|
34.18a |
|
|
|
14
34.18b |
|
|
|
34.19 |
|
|
|
34.20 |
|
|
|
34.21 |
|
|
|
34.22a |
|
|
|
34.22b |
|
|
|
34.23a |
|
|
|
34.23b |
34.24 |
|
|
|
34.25a |
|
|
|
34.25b |
|
|
|
34.26 |
|
|
|
34.27 |
|
|
|
34.28 |
|
|
|
34.29 |
|
|
|
15
34.30 |
|
|
|
34.31a |
|
|
|
34.31b |
|
|
|
34.32 |
|
|
|
34.33 |
|
|
|
34.34 |
|
|
|
34.35 |
|
|
|
34.36a |
|
|
|
34.36b |
34.37 |
|
|
|
34.38 |
|
|
|
35 |
Servicer compliance statements. (see Explanatory Note #8) |
|
|
35.1 |
Servicer compliance statement, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as master servicer |
|
|
35.2 |
Servicer compliance statement, Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, as special servicer |
|
|
35.3 |
Servicer compliance statement, Citibank, N.A., as certificate administrator |
|
|
35.4 |
|
|
|
35.5 |
|
|
|
16
35.6 |
|
|
|
35.7 |
|
|
|
35.8 |
|
|
|
35.9 |
35.10 |
|
|
|
99.1 |
|
|
|
99.2 |
|
|
|
99.3 |
|
|
|
99.4 |
|
|
|
99.5 |
17
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
Date: March 30, 2023
|
Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Securities Inc. |
(Depositor) |
|
/s/ Richard Simpson |
Richard Simpson, President |
18
| This ‘10-K’ Filing | Date | Other Filings | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
 | ||||
| Filed as of: | 3/31/23 | |||
| Filed on: | 3/30/23 | 10-D, ABS-EE | ||
| For Period end: | 12/31/22 | |||
| 11/10/22 | ||||
| 8/30/22 | 10-D, ABS-EE | |||
| 4/22/22 | ||||
| 3/10/22 | ||||
| 2/8/22 | ||||
| 12/29/21 | ||||
| 10/28/21 | ||||
| 10/27/21 | ||||
| 8/3/21 | ||||
| 7/7/21 | 8-K | |||
| 6/2/21 | ||||
| 5/20/21 | ||||
| 5/13/21 | ||||
| 5/10/21 | ||||
| 1/27/21 | ||||
| 8/26/20 | 8-K | |||
| 9/3/19 | 8-K | |||
| 1/11/19 | ||||
| 12/7/18 | ||||
| 12/6/18 | ||||
| 1/29/18 | ||||
| 11/30/17 | ||||
| 11/13/17 | ||||
| 9/27/17 | ||||
| 6/20/17 | ||||
| 4/18/17 | 424B2, 8-K | |||
| 1/6/17 | ||||
| 10/5/16 | ||||
| 5/27/16 | ||||
| 12/30/15 | ||||
| 6/18/14 | ||||
| List all Filings | ||||
As Of Filer Filing For·On·As Docs:Size Issuer Filing Agent 7/06/17 Citigroup Com’l Mtge Tr 2017-P7 8-K:1,9 6/29/17 2:7.6M Nuvo Group, Inc./FA 6/14/17 Citigroup Com’l Mtge Tr 2017-P7 8-K:1,9 6/08/17 2:7.1M Nuvo Group, Inc./FA 4/18/17 Citigroup Com’l Mtge Tr 2017-P7 8-K:8,9 4/18/17 28:44M Nuvo Group, Inc./FA |