Registration of Securities Issued in a Business-Combination Transaction — Form S-4
Filing Table of Contents
Document/Exhibit Description Pages Size
1: S-4 Registration of Securities Issued in a 140 727K
Business-Combination Transaction
2: EX-1 Underwriting Agreement 16 87K
3: EX-3.1 Articles of Incorporation/Organization or By-Laws 28 97K
4: EX-3.2 Articles of Incorporation/Organization or By-Laws 13 53K
5: EX-4.1 Instrument Defining the Rights of Security Holders 102 365K
6: EX-4.2 Instrument Defining the Rights of Security Holders 29 113K
7: EX-4.3 Instrument Defining the Rights of Security Holders 147± 648K
8: EX-4.4 Instrument Defining the Rights of Security Holders 295± 1.28M
9: EX-4.6 Instrument Defining the Rights of Security Holders 2 15K
10: EX-5 Opinion re: Legality 2 14K
19: EX-10.09 Material Contract 2 17K
11: EX-10.1 Material Contract 89± 293K
20: EX-10.10 Material Contract 67± 268K
21: EX-10.11 Material Contract 8 63K
23: EX-10.13 Material Contract 8± 39K
24: EX-10.14 Material Contract 4± 25K
25: EX-10.15 Material Contract 8± 39K
26: EX-10.16 Material Contract 6± 27K
12: EX-10.2 Material Contract 55± 200K
13: EX-10.3 Material Contract 116± 276K
14: EX-10.4 Material Contract 67± 228K
15: EX-10.5 Material Contract 13± 70K
16: EX-10.6 Material Contract 63± 261K
17: EX-10.7 Material Contract 11± 49K
18: EX-10.8 Material Contract 8± 38K
22: EX-11.12 Statement re: Computation of Earnings Per Share 58 225K
27: EX-12 Statement re: Computation of Ratios 1 11K
28: EX-21 Subsidiaries of the Registrant 1 11K
29: EX-23.2 Consent of Experts or Counsel 1 11K
30: EX-25 Statement re: Eligibility of Trustee 26 100K
31: EX-99.1 Miscellaneous Exhibit 12 52K
32: EX-99.2 Miscellaneous Exhibit 3 16K
33: EX-99.3 Miscellaneous Exhibit 2 13K
34: EX-99.4 Miscellaneous Exhibit 2 14K
35: EX-99.5 Miscellaneous Exhibit 3 13K
S-4 — Registration of Securities Issued in a Business-Combination Transaction
Document Table of Contents
As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 3, 2002
Registration No. 333-_____
================================================================================
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
-----------------------
Form S-4
REGISTRATION STATEMENT
UNDER
THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933
-----------------------
IPALCO ENTERPRISES, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Indiana 4911 35-1575582
(State or other jurisdiction of (Primary Standard Industrial (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization) Classification Code Number) Identification No.)
One Monument Circle
Indianapolis, IN 46204
(317) 261-8261
(Address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of
registrant's principal executive offices)
S. Michael Woodard, Esq.
IPALCO ENTERPRISES, INC.
One Monument Circle
Indianapolis, IN 46204
(317) 261-8261
(Name, address, including zip code, and telephone number,
including area code, of agent for service)
-----------------------
Copies to:
Richard D. Truesdell, Jr.
Davis Polk & Wardwell
450 Lexington Avenue
New York, New York 10017
(212) 450-4000
-----------------------
Approximate date of commencement of proposed sale to the public: From time
to time after the effective date of this Registration Statement.
If the securities being registered on this Form are being offered in
connection with the formation of a holding company and there is compliance with
General Instruction G, check the following box: [ ]
If this form is filed to register additional securities for an offering
pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act, check the following box and
list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective
registration statement for the same offering. [ ]______________________________
If this form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(d)
under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act
registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement
for the same offering. [ ]
CALCULATION OF REGISTRATION FEE
[Enlarge/Download Table]
========================================= =================== ===================== ===================== =====================
Proposed Maximum Proposed Maximum
Title of Each Class Amount to be Offering Price Per Aggregate Offering Amount of
of Securities to be Registered Registered Unit(1) Price(1) Registration Fee
----------------------------------------- ------------------- --------------------- --------------------- ---------------------
7.375% Senior Secured Notes due 2008 $ 375,000,000 100% $ 375,000,000 $69,000
7.625% Senior Secured Notes due 2011 $ 375,000,000 100% $ 375,000,000
========================================= =================== ===================== ===================== =====================
(1) Estimated solely for the purpose of calculating the amount of the
registration fee pursuant to Rule 457(f).
-----------------------
The registrant hereby amends this Registration Statement on such date or
dates as may be necessary to delay its effective date until the registrant
shall file a further amendment which specifically states that this Registration
Statement shall thereafter become effective in accordance with Section 8(a) of
the Securities Act of 1933, as amended or until the Registration Statement
shall become effective on such date as the Commission, acting pursuant to said
Section 8(a), may determine.
================================================================================
THE INFORMATION IN THIS PROSPECTUS IS NOT COMPLETE AND MAY BE CHANGED. WE MAY
NOT SELL THESE SECURITIES UNTIL THE REGISTRATION STATEMENT FILED WITH THE
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION IS EFFECTIVE. THIS PROSPECTUS IS NOT AN
OFFER TO SELL THESE SECURITIES AND WE ARE NOT SOLICITING OFFERS TO BUY THESE
SECURITIES IN ANY STATE WHERE THE OFFER OR SALE IS NOT PERMITTED.
PROSPECTUS (SUBJECT TO COMPLETION)
IPALCO ENTERPRISES, INC.
Offer to Exchange
$375,000,000 7.375% Senior Secured Notes due 2008; and
$375,000,000 7.625% Senior Secured Notes due 2011
(which have been registered under the Securities Act)
For Any and All Outstanding
7.375% Senior Secured Notes due 2008; and
7.625% Senior Secured Notes due 2011
(which have not been registered under the Securities Act)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
THE EXCHANGE OFFER WILL EXPIRE AT 5:00 P.M.
NEW YORK CITY TIME, , 2002 UNLESS EXTENDED
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
We are offering to exchange up to $375,000,000 of our new 7.375% Senior
Secured Notes due 2008 for up to $375,000,000 of our existing 7.375% Senior
Secured Notes due 2008. We are also offering to exchange up to $375,000,000 of
our new 7.625% Senior Secured Notes due 2011 for up to $375,000,000 of our
existing 7.625% Senior Secured Notes due 2011. The terms of the new notes are
identical in all material respects to the terms of the old notes, except that
the new notes have been registered under the Securities Act, and the transfer
restrictions and registration rights relating to the old notes do not apply to
the new notes.
To exchange your old notes for new notes:
o you are required to make the representations described on page 80 to
us
o you must complete and send the letter of transmittal that accompanies
this prospectus to the exchange agent, Bank One Trust Company, N.A.,
by 5:00 p.m., New York time, on , 2002
o you should read the section called "The Exchange Offer" for further
information on how to exchange your old notes for new notes
Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state securities
commission has approved or disapproved of the securities to be issued in the
exchange offer or passed upon the adequacy or accuracy of this Prospectus. Any
representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.
, 2002
-----------------------
TABLE OF CONTENTS
-----------------------
Page
----
Summary......................................................................3
Forward-Looking Statements..................................................10
Use of Proceeds.............................................................11
Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges .........................................11
Capitalization..............................................................12
Selected Consolidated Financial Data........................................13
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations.......................................15
Business....................................................................28
Management..................................................................41
Ownership...................................................................48
Related Party Transactions..................................................48
Description of Other Indebtedness ..........................................50
Description of the Notes....................................................53
The Exchange Offer..........................................................74
United States Tax Consequences of the Exchange Offer........................81
Plan of Distribution .......................................................81
Legal Matters...............................................................82
Experts.....................................................................82
Where You Can Find More Information.........................................82
Index to Financial Statements..............................................F-1
-----------------------
In this prospectus, unless otherwise noted, "IPALCO," "we, "us" and "our"
refer to IPALCO Enterprises, Inc. You should rely only on the information
contained in this prospectus. We have not authorized anyone to provide you with
information different from that contained in this prospectus. We are offering
to exchange these notes only in jurisdictions where their exchange is
permitted. The information contained in this prospectus is accurate only as of
the date of this prospectus, regardless of the time of delivery of this
prospectus or of any exchange made hereunder.
ii
SUMMARY
This summary highlights the more detailed information in this prospectus
and you should read the entire prospectus carefully.
IPALCO
We are a holding company and our principal subsidiary is Indianapolis
Power & Light Company, or IPL. IPL is engaged primarily in generating,
transmitting, distributing and selling electric energy in the City of
Indianapolis and neighboring cities, towns and communities, and adjacent rural
areas all within the State of Indiana, the most distant point being about forty
miles from Indianapolis. IPL owns and operates two primarily coal-fired
generating plants and a separately-sited combustion turbine that are used for
electric generation. IPL also owns and operates one coal and gas-fired plant.
For electric generation, the total demonstrated net capability is 3,118
megawatts, net winter capability is 3,129 megawatts and net summer capability
is 3,036 megawatts.
Our total electric revenues during 2001 were approximately $828.0 million
and total assets as of December 31, 2001, were approximately $2.0 billion.
Our principal executive offices are located at One Monument Circle,
Indianapolis, Indiana 46204 and our telephone number is (317) 261-8261.
AES
We are owned by The AES Corporation, AES, who acquired us in an
approximately $2.15 billion stock-for-stock pooling transaction in March 2001.
AES is a global power company committed to providing electricity to customers
in a socially responsible way.
AES executive offices are located at 1001 North 19th Street, Arlington,
VA, 22209 and their telephone number is (703) 522-1315.
The Exchange Offer
Securities offered................ We are offering up to $375,000,000 aggregate
principal amount of 7.375% Senior Secured
Notes due 2008, which have been registered
under the Securities Act and $375,000,000
aggregate principal amount of 7.625% Senior
Secured Notes due 2011, which have been
registered under the Securities Act.
The exchange offer................ We are offering to issue the new notes in
exchange for a like principal amount of your
old notes. We are offering to issue the new
notes to satisfy our obligations contained
in the registration rights agreement entered
into when the old notes were sold in
transactions permitted by Rule 144A and
Regulation S under the Securities Act and
therefore not registered with the SEC. For
procedures for tendering, see "The Exchange
Offer."
Tenders, expiration date,
withdrawal...................... The exchange offer will expire at 5:00 p.m.
New York City time on , 2002 unless
it is extended. If you decide to exchange
your old notes for new notes, you must
acknowledge that you are not engaging in,
and do
3
not intend to engage in, a distribution of
the new notes. If you decide to tender your
old notes in the exchange offer, you may
withdraw them at any time prior to
, 2002. If we decide for any
reason not to accept any old notes for
exchange, your old notes will be returned to
you without expense to you promptly after
the exchange offer expires.
Federal income tax consequences... Your exchange of old notes for new notes in
the exchange offer will not result in any
income, gain or loss to you for Federal
income tax purposes. See "United States
Federal Income Tax Consequences of the
Exchange Offer."
Use of proceeds................... We will not receive any proceeds from the
issuance of the new notes in the exchange
offer.
Exchange agent.................... Bank One Trust Company, N.A. is the
exchange agent for the exchange offer.
Failure to tender your old notes.. If you fail to tender your old notes in the
exchange offer, you will not have any
further rights under the registration rights
agreement, including any right to require us
to register your old notes or to pay you
additional interest.
You will be able to resell the new notes without registering them with the SEC
if you meet the requirements described below.
Based on interpretations by the SEC's staff in no-action letters issued to
third parties, we believe that new notes issued in exchange for old notes in
the exchange offer may be offered for resale, resold or otherwise transferred
by you without registering the new notes under the Securities Act or delivering
a prospectus, unless you are a broker-dealer receiving notes for your own
account, so long as:
o you are not one of our "affiliates," which is defined in Rule 405 of
the Securities Act;
o you acquire the new notes in the ordinary course of your business;
o you do not have any arrangement or understanding with any person to
participate in the distribution of the new notes; and
o you are not engaged in, and do not intend to engage in, a
distribution of the new notes.
If you are an affiliate of IPALCO, or you are engaged in, intend to engage
in or have any arrangement or understanding with respect to, the distribution
of new notes acquired in the exchange offer, you:
(1) should not rely on our interpretations of the position of the SEC's
staff, and
(2) must comply with the registration and prospectus delivery requirements
of the Securities Act in connection with any resale transaction.
If you are a broker-dealer and receive new notes for your own account in
the exchange offer:
o you must represent that you do not have any arrangement with us or
any of our affiliates to distribute the new notes;
4
o you must acknowledge that you will deliver a prospectus in connection
with any resale of the new notes you receive from us in the exchange
offer; the letter of transmittal states that by so acknowledging and
by delivering a prospectus, you will not be deemed to admit that you
are an "underwriter" within the meaning of the Securities Act; and
o you may use this prospectus, as it may be amended or supplemented
from time to time, in connection with the resale of new notes
received in exchange for old notes acquired by you as a result of
market-making or other trading activities.
For a period of 180 days after the expiration of the exchange offer, we
will make this prospectus available to any broker-dealer for use in connection
with any resale described above.
The New Notes
The terms of the new notes and the old notes are identical in all material
respects, except that the new notes have been registered under the Securities
Act, and the transfer restrictions and registrations rights relating to old
notes do not apply to the new notes. We refer to the new notes as the "notes"
in this prospectus.
The notes......................... $375,000,000 principal amount of 7.375%
senior secured notes due 2008.
$375,000,000 principal amount of 7.625%
senior secured notes due 2011.
Maturity.......................... The 2008 notes will mature on November 14,
2008.
The 2011 notes will mature on November 14,
2011.
Interest payment dates............ November 15 and May 15 of each year (and at
maturity), commencing on May 15, 2002.
Record Date....................... The regular record date for each interest
payment date will be the close of business
on November 1 or May 1 immediately preceding
the interest payment date.
Interest Accrual.................. The 2008 notes will accrue interest at the
rate of 7.375% per year.
The 2011 notes will accrue interest at the
rate of 7.625% per year.
Interest Rate Step-Up............. The interest rate payable on the notes will
be subject to adjustment from time to time
if either Moody's or S&P, or both,
downgrades the ratings ascribed to the notes
below certain thresholds.
(a) If the rating from Moody's is decreased
below Baa3, the annual interest rate for
each series of notes will increase by .50%.
(b) In addition, if the rating from S&P is
decreased below BBB-, then the annual
interest rate for each series of notes will
increase by 0.50%.
5
Each adjustment required by any decrease in
rating above, whether occasioned by the
action of Moody's or S&P, or both, shall be
made independent of any and all other
adjustments. If Moody's or S&P subsequently
increases its rating of the notes to any of
the thresholds set forth under clause (a) or
(b) above or higher, the annual interest
rate on each series of notes will be
readjusted downwards by the percentage set
forth in such clause. If the annual interest
rate on the notes is increased as a result
of clauses (a) and (b) above, the total
increase in the annual interest rate for
each series of notes pursuant to these
interest rate adjustment provisions shall
not exceed 1.00%. In no event shall (i) the
interest rate for any series of notes be
reduced to below the annual interest rate
set forth for such series on the cover page
of this prospectus.
Sinking Fund...................... None
Optional Redemption............... We may redeem some or all of the notes at
any time at a redemption price equal to the
greater of:
o 100% of the principal amount of the notes
being redeemed; or;
o the sum of the present values of the
remaining scheduled payments of principal
and interest on the notes being redeemed,
discounted to the date of redemption on a
semiannual basis at the discount rate
described in "Description of the Notes--
Optional Redemption."
Collateral........................ The notes will be secured by our pledge of
all of the outstanding common stock of IPL.
We may secure other permitted debt equally
and ratably with the notes. See "Description
of the Notes--Collateral."
Ranking........................... The indenture contains certain restrictions
on our ability to incur additional
indebtedness. The indenture contains no
restrictions on the amount of additional
indebtedness, including secured
indebtedness, which may be incurred by our
subsidiaries.
Because we are a holding company, our rights
and the rights of our creditors, including
holders of the notes, in respect of claims
on the assets of each of our subsidiaries
upon any liquidation or administration are
structurally subordinated to, and therefore
will be subject to the prior claims of, each
such subsidiary's preferred stockholders and
creditors (including trade creditors of and
holders of debt issued by such subsidiary).
At December 31, 2001, our direct and
indirect subsidiaries had total long-term
debt, current liabilities and preferred
stock of approximately $797 million, all of
which would be effectively senior to the
notes.
6
Our ability to pay interest on the notes is
dependent upon our receipt of dividends and
other distributions from our direct and
indirect subsidiaries, including IPL in
particular.
Trading........................... It is not anticipated that the notes will be
listed on any securities exchange or traded
in any automated quotation system.
Form and Denomination............. Each series of notes will be issued in the
form of one or more fully registered global
securities, without coupons, in
denominations of $1,000 in principal amount
and integral multiples of $1,000. We will
deposit these securities with, or on behalf
of, The Depository Trust Company. Beneficial
interests in the global securities will be
represented through book-entry accounts of
financial institutions acting on behalf of
the beneficial owner.
Covenants......................... The indenture governing the notes contains
covenants that, among other things, will
limit our ability and, in the certain cases
of restrictions on liens and permitted
business activities, our significant
subsidiaries to:
o incur additional debt;
o pay dividends or other distributions and
payment on our capital stock;
o create certain liens on assets and
properties;
o engage in new business and activities; and
o consolidate or merge, or convey, transfer
or lease substantially all of our
consolidated properties and assets.
These covenants are subject to important
exceptions and qualifications, which are
described in "Description of the
Notes--Covenants." The indenture does not in
any way restrict or prevent IPL or any other
subsidiary from incurring indebtedness.
Use of Proceeds................... We will not receive any proceeds from the
exchange of new notes for old notes.
7
SUMMARY CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL AND OTHER DATA
The following table presents our summary consolidated financial data which
should be read in conjunction with "Management's Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations" and our audited consolidated
financial statements and the related notes included elsewhere in this
prospectus. The summary statement of consolidated income data for the years
ended 2001, 2000 and 1999 and summary consolidated balance sheet data for the
years ended 2001 and 2000 are derived from our audited consolidated financial
statements that are included in this prospectus. The summary statement of
consolidated income data for the years ended 1998 and 1997 and the summary
consolidated balance sheet data for 1999, 1998 and 1997 are derived from our
audited consolidated financial statements that are not included in this
prospectus. The consolidated financial statements for 2001, 2000 and 1999 have
been audited by Deloitte & Touche LLP. The historical results of consolidated
operations are not necessarily indicative of results to be expected for any
subsequent period.
[Enlarge/Download Table]
Year Ended December 31,
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
2001 2000 1999 1998 1997
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
(In Thousands)
Operating Data:
Total utility operating revenues (1) $ 828,046 $ 858,535 $ 834,652 $ 821,256 $ 776,427
Termination benefit agreement costs
(2)............................. (74,765) -- -- -- --
Voluntary early retirement program
benefit costs (3)............... (23,751) (62,007) -- -- --
Utility operating income........... 130,641 136,223 183,501 179,511 167,315
Allowance for funds used during
construction.................... 1,974 3,034 2,201 2,300 4,407
Income before cumulative effect of
accounting change and
extraordinary loss.............. 77,947 158,842 128,947 130,119 95,699
Cumulative effect of accounting
change (1)...................... -- -- -- -- 18,347
Extraordinary loss on early retirement
of debt (4)..................... -- (4,259) -- -- --
Net income......................... 77,947 154,583 128,947 130,119 114,046
Balance Sheet Data (end of
period):
Utility plant -- net................ 1,665,717 1,647,834 1,750,412 1,748,460 1,766,383
Total assets....................... 1,995,930 1,983,276 2,315,837 2,118,945 2,154,349
Common shareholder's equity........ 4,229 730,148 677,746 574,191 526,129
Cumulative preferred stock of
subsidiary...................... 59,135 59,135 59,135 59,135 9,135
Long-term debt (less current
maturities and sinking fund
requirements)................... 1,371,930 621,863 870,050 907,974 1,032,846
Other Data:
Utility construction expenditures.. 126,517 75,712 103,452 79,458 73,130
Nonutility construction expenditures -- 438 295 975 1,569
-------------------
(1) In 1997, IPL changed its method of accounting to record revenues of all
electricity and steam delivered during the period. Prior to 1997, IPL
recognized revenues on a cycle basis as meters were read. The new
accounting method more accurately reports revenues in the period in which
electricity and steam are used by customers. The cumulative effect of the
change in accounting as of January 1, 1997 was $18.3 million.
(2) Termination benefits represent costs related to the termination of certain
employees as a result of our acquisition by AES. The pretax expenses
included $59.4 million related to termination benefit agreements and
severance, $9.2 million in supplemental retirement costs and $6.2 million
in restricted stock expense.
(3) Voluntary Early Retirement Program Benefit Costs for 2000 represent $56.8
million pre-tax non-cash pension and $5.2 million other post-retirement
benefit costs associated with the Voluntary Early Retirement Program (VERP
I)
8
implemented in November 2000. Participation was limited to, and
subsequently accepted by 400 qualified employees who elected retirement
dates in 2001.
On June 1, 2001, we approved a second Voluntary Early Retirement Program
(VERP II). Upon expiration of the revocation period on July 23, 2001, 141
employees accepted VERP II. We recognized $17.2 million pre-tax non-cash
pension costs and $2.6 million other post-retirement benefit costs
associated with VERP II in 2001.
On September 14, 2001, we approved a third Voluntary Early Retirement
Program (VERP III). Upon expiration of the revocation period on October
31, 2001, nine employees accepted VERP III. We recognized $2.0 million
pre-tax non-cash pension costs and $2.0 million other post-retirement
benefit costs associated with VERP III in 2001.
(4) In November 2000, we sold our steam operations to Citizens Gas & Coke
Utility using a portion of the net proceeds to retire debt specifically
assignable to the assets sold. In connection with the retirement, we
incurred make-whole payments and wrote off debt issuance costs of $4.3
million which was recorded as an extraordinary loss on early retirement of
debt.
9
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This prospectus includes "forward-looking statements" including, in
particular, the statements about our plans, strategies and prospects under the
headings "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations." Forward-looking statements express an expectation or
belief and contain a projection, plan or assumption with regard to, among other
things, future revenues, income, earnings per share or capital structure. Such
statements of future events or performance are not guarantees of future
performance and involve estimates, assumptions and uncertainties. The words
"anticipate," "believe," "estimate," "expect," "forecast," "project,"
"objective," and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking
statements.
Some important factors that could cause our actual results or outcomes to
differ materially from those discussed in the forward-looking statements
include, but are not limited to, our acquisition and control by AES,
fluctuations in customer growth and demand, weather, fuel costs, generating
unit availability, purchased power costs and availability, regulatory action,
environmental matters, federal and state legislation, interest rates, labor
strikes, maintenance and capital expenditures, local economic conditions and
the specific needs of plants to perform unanticipated facility maintenance or
repairs or outages. In addition, our ability to have available an appropriate
amount of production capacity in a timely manner can significantly affect our
financial performance. The timing of deregulation and competition, product
development and technology changes are also important potential factors that
may cause actual results or outcomes to differ materially from those discussed
in the forward-looking statements. Most of these factors affect us through our
wholly owned subsidiary, Indianapolis Power & Light Company, or IPL.
All such factors are difficult to predict, contain uncertainties that may
materially affect actual results and are beyond our control. We undertake no
obligation to publicly update or review any forward-looking information, future
events or otherwise.
10
USE OF PROCEEDS
We will not receive any cash proceeds from the issuance of the new notes.
The new notes will be exchanged for old notes as described in this prospectus
upon our receipt of old notes. We will cancel all of the old notes surrendered
in exchange for the new notes.
RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
Our ratio of earnings to fixed charges is as follows:
[Enlarge/Download Table]
Year Ended December 31,
------------------------------------------------------------
2001(1) 2000(1) 1999 1998 1997
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges................. 3.22 5.61 4.09 4.02 3.54
-------------------
(1) Excluding items relating to sales of assets, charges for voluntary early
retirement programs and other merger related costs of $65,043,000 in the
year ended December 31, 2000, and $89,243,000 in the year ended December
31, 2001, the ratio of earnings to fixed charges would have been 4.47 for
the year ended December 31, 2000, and 4.90 for the year ended December 31,
2001.
For the purposes of computing the ratio of earnings to fixed charges,
earnings consist of income from continuing operations before income taxes plus
fixed charges (less capitalized interest) and preferred dividend requirements
of subsidiary. Fixed charges consist of interest on all indebtedness,
amortization of debt discount, preferred dividend requirements of subsidiary
and that portion of rental expense which we believe to be representative of an
interest factor.
11
CAPITALIZATION
The following table sets forth our capitalization as of December 31, 2001.
This table should be read in conjunction with "Management's Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" and the Consolidated
Financial Statements and Notes thereto appearing elsewhere in this prospectus.
[Enlarge/Download Table]
December 31,
2001
-------------
Actual
-------------
(in thousands)
Common shareholders' equity
Premium on 4% cumulative preferred stock.................................. $ 649
Retained earnings......................................................... 15,049
Accumulated other comprehensive income.................................... (11,469)
----------
Total common shareholders' equity...................................... 4,229
Cumulative preferred stock of subsidiary..................................... 59,135
Long-term debt (less current maturities and sinking fund requirements)....... 1,371,930
----------
Total capitalization................................................... $1,435,294
==========
As previously discussed, AES acquired us in an approximately $2.15 billion
stock-for-stock pooling of interests transaction in March 2001. Accordingly, no
asset step-up was recorded with the acquisition to reflect the difference
between the acquisition price and the book value of the assets acquired.
12
SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA
The following table presents our selected consolidated financial data
which should be read in conjunction with "Management's Discussion and Analysis
of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" and our audited consolidated
financial statements and the related notes included elsewhere in this
prospectus. The selected statement of consolidated income data for the years
ended 2001, 2000 and 1999 and selected consolidated balance sheet data for the
years ended 2001 and 2000 are derived from our audited consolidated financial
statements that are included in this prospectus. The selected statement of
consolidated income data for the years ended 1998 and 1997 and the selected
consolidated balance sheet data for 1999, 1998 and 1997 are derived from our
audited consolidated financial statements that are not included in this
prospectus. The consolidated financial statements for 2001, 2000 and 1999 have
been audited by Deloitte & Touche LLP. The historical results of consolidated
operations are not necessarily indicative of results to be expected for any
subsequent period.
[Enlarge/Download Table]
Year Ended December 31,
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
2001 2000 1999 1998 1997
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
(In Thousands)
Operating Data:
Total utility operating revenues (1) $ 828,046 $ 858,535 $ 834,652 $ 821,256 $ 776,427
Termination benefit agreement costs
(2)............................. (74,765) -- -- -- --
Voluntary early retirement program
benefits costs (3).............. (23,751) (62,007) -- -- --
Utility operating income........... 130,641 136,223 183,501 179,511 167,315
Allowance for funds used during
construction.................... 1,974 3,034 2,201 2,300 4,407
Income before cumulative effect of
accounting change and
extraordinary loss.............. 77,947 158,842 128,947 130,119 95,699
Cumulative effect of accounting
change (1)...................... -- -- -- -- 18,347
Extraordinary loss on early retirement
of debt (4)..................... -- (4,259) -- -- --
Net income......................... 77,947 154,583 128,947 130,119 114,046
Balance Sheet Data (end of
period):
Utility plant - net................ 1,665,717 1,647,834 1,750,412 1,748,460 1,766,383
Total assets....................... 1,995,930 1,983,276 2,315,837 2,118,945 2,154,349
Common shareholder's equity........ 4,229 730,148 677,746 574,191 526,129
Cumulative preferred stock of
subsidiary...................... 59,135 59,135 59,135 59,135 9,135
Long-term debt (less current
maturities and sinking fund
requirements)................... 1,371,930 621,863 870,050 907,974 1,032,846
Other Data:
Utility construction expenditures.. 126,517 75,712 103,452 79,458 73,130
Nonutility construction expenditures -- 438 295 975 1,569
-------------------
(1) In 1997, IPL changed its method of accounting to record revenues of all
electricity and steam delivered during the period. Prior to 1997, IPL
recognized revenues on a cycle basis as meters were read. The new
accounting method more accurately reports revenues in the period in which
electricity and steam are used by customers. The cumulative effect of the
change in accounting as of January 1, 1997 was $18.3 million.
(2) Termination benefits represents costs related to the termination of
certain employees as a result of our acquisition by AES. The pretax
expenses included $59.4 million related to termination benefit agreements
and severance, $9.2 million in supplemental retirement costs and $6.2
million in restricted stock expense.
(3) Voluntary Early Retirement Program Benefit Costs for 2000 represent $56.8
million pre-tax non-cash pension and $5.2 million other post-retirement
benefit costs associated with the Voluntary Early Retirement Program
implemented in November 2000 (VERP I). Participation was limited to, and
subsequently accepted by 400 qualified employees who elected retirement
dates in 2001.
13
On June 1, 2001, we approved a second Voluntary Early Retirement Program
(VERP II). Upon expiration of the revocation period on July 23, 2001, 141
employees accepted VERP II. We recognized $17.2 million in pre-tax
non-cash pension costs and $2.6 million in other post-retirement benefit
costs associated with VERP II in 2001.
On September 14, 2001, we approved a third Voluntary Early Retirement
Program (VERP III). Upon expiration of the revocation period on October
31, 2001, nine employees accepted VERP III. We recognized $2.0 million in
pre-tax non-cash pension costs and $2.0 million in other post-retirement
benefit costs associated with VERP III in 2001.
(4) In November 2000, we sold our steam operations to Citizens Gas & Coke
Utility using a portion of the net proceeds to retire debt specifically
assignable to the assets sold. In connection with the retirement, we
incurred make-whole payments and wrote off debt issuance costs of $4.3
million which was recorded as an extraordinary loss on early retirement of
debt.
14
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Overview
We are a holding company incorporated under the laws of the state of Indiana.
Our principal subsidiary, IPL, is engaged primarily in generating,
transmitting, distributing and selling electric energy in the City of
Indianapolis and neighboring cities, towns and communities, and adjacent rural
areas all within the State of Indiana, the most distant point being about forty
miles from Indianapolis. Until November 2000, it also produced, distributed and
sold steam within a limited area in Indianapolis. IPL owns and operates two
primarily coal-fired generating plants and a separately-sited combustion
turbine that are used for electric generation. IPL also owns and operates one
coal and gas-fired plant. For electric generation, the total demonstrated net
capability is 3,118 megawatts, net winter capability is 3,129 megawatts and net
summer capability is 3,036 megawatts.
Our other direct subsidiary is Mid-America Capital Resources, Inc., or
Mid-America. Mid-America is the holding company for our unregulated activities,
although it is not currently conducting any business. Our regulated business is
conducted through IPL. We have historically had two business segments: electric
and "all other." Our steam operations were in the "all other" segment prior to
being sold effective November 20, 2000. The operations of our Cleveland Energy
Resources subsidiary were in the "all other" segment prior to being sold
effective May 21, 2001. Since the sale of our steam operations and district
cooling business, substantially all of our business consists of the generation,
transmission, distribution and sale of electric energy conducted through IPL.
Acquisition by AES
On July 15, 2000, we entered into an Agreement and Plan of Share Exchange with
The AES Corporation, a Delaware corporation, whereby AES agreed to acquire us
in a stock-for-stock transaction. On October 20, 2000, our shareholders
approved the Agreement and Plan of Share Exchange with AES at a special meeting
of shareholders. On March 23, 2001, final regulatory approval of the
acquisition was received and on March 27, 2001, AES completed the acquisition.
At the effective time of the share exchange, each of the outstanding 89,685,177
shares of our common stock was converted into the right to receive 0.463 of a
share of AES common stock, for an aggregated purchase price of $2.15 billion
and $890 million in assumed debt and preferred stock. Following the share
exchange, AES owns all of our outstanding common stock. Treasury stock of
$500.6 million was cancelled as a result of the acquisition. Accordingly, the
common stock balance was reduced by $459.8 million and the remaining $40.8
million was applied against retained earnings.
During the year ended December 31, 2001 and 2000, we expensed $6.3 million and
$5.8 million of merger related costs, respectively. Total merger related costs
were $12.1 million. As a result of our acquisition by AES, we recorded $74.8
million, or $46.4 million after tax, of costs related to the termination of
certain employees. The pretax expenses included $59.4 million in costs
associated with termination benefit agreements and severance, $9.2 million in
supplemental retirement costs, and $6.2 million in restricted stock expense.
Sale of the Assets of the Steam Operations, Mid-America Energy Resources
and Indianapolis Campus Energy
On November 20, 2000, we sold certain assets, referred to as the thermal
assets, to Citizens Gas & Coke Utility. The thermal assets included the Perry K
Steam Plant and downtown steam distribution system operated by IPL; the central
city chilled water cooling and distribution system owned by Mid-America Energy
Resources and the chilled water cooling system owned by Indianapolis Campus
Energy, Inc. that provides services to Eli Lilly & Company. The transaction
resulted in a gain to us, on a consolidated basis, of $30.6 million, or $18.7
million after tax. See Note 1 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements. These assets, together with Cleveland Energy Resources, constituted
substantially all of our steam operations.
15
Sale of Cleveland Energy Resources
On May 21, 2001, we sold the assets of Cleveland Energy Resources to
Dominion Cleveland Thermal, Inc., a subsidiary of Dominion Energy, Inc.
Cleveland Energy Resources includes two subsidiaries of Mid-America, Cleveland
Thermal Energy Corporation and Cleveland District Cooling Corporation.
Cleveland Thermal owns and operates two steam plants in Cleveland, Ohio.
Cleveland Cooling owns and operates a district cooling facility located near
downtown Cleveland, which distributes chilled water to subscribers located
downtown for their air conditioning needs. The selling price for the assets was
$14.6 million. See Note 1 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
The completion of the sale had no significant income statement impact.
Post-retirement Plans
During 2000, we recognized a non-cash $6.7 million curtailment loss for a
supplemental retirement plan reflecting the expected near-term retirement of
certain plan participants.
On October 20, 2000, we curtailed and settled our existing post-retirement
medical and life insurance plans. Post-retirement plan assets are held by an
independent trustee and are encompassed by a Voluntary Employee Beneficiary
Association Trust. Existing eligible retirees and active employees, as of March
27, 2001, who ultimately retire as active employees at age 55 or later are
eligible to receive post-retirement benefits from the independent trustee. In
November 2000, we made a $7.5 million payment to the independent trustee as
settlement of its obligations relating to the Post-retirement Plans. The plan
was spun off on October 20, 2000, to an independent trustee. See Notes 12 and
13 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Voluntary Early Retirement Program
On November 9, 2000, we implemented a Voluntary Early Retirement Program.
This program offered enhanced retirement benefits upon early retirement to
eligible employees. The program was available to all employees, except
officers, whose combined age and years of service totaled at least 75 on
December 31, 2001. Participation was limited to, and subsequently accepted by,
400 qualified employees. Participants elected actual retirement dates in 2001.
Additionally, we will provide post-retirement medical and life insurance
benefits to program retirees until age 55 at which time they will be eligible
to receive similar benefits from the independent Voluntary Employee Beneficiary
Association trustee. We recognized a $56.8 million pre-tax non-cash pension
charge and a $5.2 million charge for other post-retirement benefit costs of the
program in December 2000.
On June 1, 2001, we implemented a second Voluntary Early Retirement
Program to 225 individuals, offering substantially the same retirement
enhancements as described in the prior paragraph. Upon expiration of the
revocation period on July 23, 2001, the offer under this program was accepted
by 141 individuals, who will take retirement dates between August 1, 2001, and
August 1, 2004. We recognized $17.2 million in pre-tax non-cash pension and
$2.6 million in other post-retirement benefit costs associated with this
program in 2001.
On September 14, 2001, we approved a third Voluntary Early Retirement
Program limited to personnel at our Petersburg Generating Station, offering
substantially the same retirement enhancements as described in the prior
paragraph(s). Upon expiration of the revocation period on October 31, 2001, the
offer under this program was accepted by nine employees, who will take
retirement dates as agreed upon between IPL and the employees. We recognized
$2.0 million in pre-tax non-cash pension costs and $2.0 million in other
post-retirement benefit costs associated with this program in 2001.
Program-related cash contributions were $5.3 million for 2001. We
anticipate program-related cash contributions for pension benefits of $11.4
million for 2002, $46.7 million in 2003, and $39.7 million in 2004. These
estimates are based on actuarial assumptions using a 7.25% discount rate.
16
Capital Stock
On March 15, 1999, we completed a common stock purchase plan which began
in 1998. The 1998 purchase plan resulted in the purchase, through open market
and privately negotiated transactions, of 6.0 million shares or 6.6% of our
outstanding common stock for a total cost of $154.0 million. The 1998 purchase
plan was financed with the issuance of additional commercial paper through a
commercial paper facility, as well as with cash flows from operations. There
was no outstanding balance in the commercial paper facility at December 31,
2001. In December, 2001, we terminated our 4(2) special purpose commercial
paper facility.
During 2001, we paid $29.0 million of common stock dividends to our
shareholders prior to our acquisition by AES and distributed $133.0 million in
quarterly dividends to AES. For the years ended 2000 and 1999, we paid dividends
to common shareholders of $55.0 million and $50.9 million, respectively.
During 2001 and 2000, options for 463,400 and 3,167,954 shares,
respectively, of common stock were exercised raising funds of $6.6 million and
$49.8 million, respectively, in connection with our various stock option plans.
On March 29, 2002, we made a distribution to AES of $51.0 million which
created a deficit in retained earnings.
Charges related to dispositions
Our parent corporation, AES, has disclosed that it is considering certain
strategic initiatives that may involve potential sales or dispositions of
businesses by it. We are currently assessing the impact such dispositions will
have on the pooling-of-interests accounting used for the IPALCO acquisition.
Such dispositions may require the acquisition to be restated as a purchase.
Other
During 1999, we recorded directly to shareholders' equity an unrealized
after-tax gain of $106.7 million resulting from our investment in Internet
Capital Group, Inc. (Nasdaq: ICGE), an internet holding company, which went
public in August 1999. In 2000, Mid-America sold approximately one million
shares of Internet Capital Group resulting in a realized gain of $112.6
million. The total realized gain is reduced by related compensation expenses
and gross receipts tax of $10.3 million and income taxes of $42.2 million. The
after-tax proceeds from these sales were applied primarily to the reduction of
our outstanding unsecured debt. During 2000, unrealized losses of $61.8
million, or $37.6 million after-tax were recorded to comprehensive income to
reflect the decrease in market price for the unsold shares.
In 1999, Mid-America, our wholly owned subsidiary, made a commitment to
invest $15.0 million in EnerTech Capital Partners II L.P., a venture capital
fund. The fund invests in service and technology companies providing innovative
products and services that take advantage of opportunities created by
deregulation of the energy and telecommunications industries. Through December
31, 2001, Mid-America has funded $4.5 million of such commitment. Mid-America
funded an additional $0.9 million in January 2002.
The electric utility business is affected by seasonal weather patterns
throughout the year and, therefore, our operating revenues and associated
operating expenses are not generated evenly by month during the year.
Critical Accounting Policies
General
We prepare our consolidated financial statements in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles in the U.S. As such, we are required
to make certain estimates, judgments and assumptions that we believe are
reasonable based upon the information available. These estimates and
assumptions affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date
of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses
during the period presented. The significant accounting policies which we
believe are most critical to understanding and evaluating our reported
financial results include the following: Regulation, Revenues, Authorized
Annual Operating Income, Regulatory Assets, and Contingencies.
17
Regulation: The retail utility operations of IPL are subject to the
jurisdiction of the Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission (IURC). IPL's
wholesale power transactions are subject to the jurisdiction of the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission. These agencies regulate IPL's utility business
operations, tariffs, accounting, depreciation allowances, services, security
issues and the sale and acquisition of utility properties. The financial
statements of IPL are based on generally accepted accounting principles,
including the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 71,
"Accounting for the Effects of Certain Types of Regulation," which gives
recognition to the ratemaking and accounting practices of these agencies.
Revenues: Revenues are recognized as services are provided including those
unbilled at the end of each month.
A fuel adjustment charge provision, which is established after public
hearing, is applicable to most of the rate schedules of IPL and permits the
billing or crediting of estimated fuel costs above or below the levels included
in such rate schedules. Actual fuel costs in excess of or under estimated fuel
costs billed are deferred or accrued, respectively.
IPL is allowed to recover purchased power costs based on a benchmark. If
the cost per Mwh of power purchases is not greater than the benchmark, then the
purchased power costs should be considered net energy costs that are presumed
fuel costs included in purchased power. If the average cost per Mwh of power
purchases is greater than the benchmark, then the costs are recoverable only
through demonstration of the reasonableness of those purchases to the IURC.
Authorized Annual Operating Income: Indiana law requires electric
utilities under the jurisdiction of the IURC to meet operating expense and
income requirements as a condition for approval of requested changes in fuel
adjustment charges. Additionally, customer refunds may result if the utilities'
rolling 12-month operating income, determined at quarterly measurement dates,
exceeds the utilities' authorized annual operating income and cannot be offset
by applicable cumulative net operating income deficiencies. In such a
circumstance, the required customer refund for the quarterly measurement period
is calculated to be one-fourth of the excess annual operating income grossed up
for federal and state taxes as required under I. C. 8-1-2-42.5.
IPL's authorized annual jurisdictional electric net operating income, for
purposes of quarterly operating income tests, is $163 million. This level will
be maintained until changed by an IURC order. During 2001, the Commission found
that IPL's rolling annual jurisdictional retail electric operating income was
less than the authorized annual operating income at each of the quarterly
measurement dates (January, April, July and October). At October 31, 2001,
IPL's most recent quarterly measurement date, IPL had a cumulative net
operating deficiency of $621.0 million. The operating deficiency is calculated
by summing the quarterly measurement period annual results from the date of the
last rate order. As a consequence, IPL could, for a period of time, earn above
$163 million of electric jurisdictional retail net operating income without
being required to make a customer refund.
Through the date of IPL's next general electric rate order, IPL is
required to file upward and downward adjustments in fuel cost credits and
charges on a quarterly basis, based on changes in the cost of fuel,
irrespective of its level of earnings.
Regulatory Assets: Regulatory assets represent deferred costs that have
been included as allowable costs for ratemaking purposes. IPL has recorded
regulatory assets relating to certain costs as authorized by the IURC. Specific
regulatory assets are disclosed in Note 5. As of December 31, 2001, all
regulatory assets have been included as allowable costs in orders of the IURC
(see Note 11). IPL is amortizing such nontax-related regulatory assets to
expense over periods ranging from 1 to 30 years. Tax-related regulatory assets
represent the net income tax costs to be considered in future regulatory
proceedings generally as the tax-related amounts are paid.
In accordance with regulatory treatment, IPL deferred as a regulatory asset
certain post in-service date carrying charges and certain other costs related to
its investment in Unit 4 at the Petersburg Plant. As authorized in the 1995
Electric Rate Settlement, IPL, effective September 1, 1995, is amortizing this
deferral to expense over a life that generally approximates the useful life of
the related facility. Also in accordance with regulatory treatment, IPL defers
as regulatory assets non-sinking fund debt and preferred stock redemption
premiums and expenses, and amortizes such costs over the life of the original
debt or, in the case of preferred stock
18
redemption premiums, over 20 years. If the regulator disallows a material
amount of capitalized costs to be included in future tariffs, the write-off of
the regulatory assets may have a material adverse impact on our operating
results.
Contingencies: We accrue for loss contingencies when the amount of the
loss is probable and estimable. We are subject to various environmental
regulations, and are involved in certain legal proceedings. If our actual
environmental and/or legal obligations are different from its estimates, the
recognition of the actual amounts may have an impact on our operating results
and financial condition.
Results of Operations
Fiscal 2001 Compared to Fiscal 2000 and Fiscal 2000 Compared to Fiscal 1999
Our 2001 net income of $77.9 million decreased by $76.7 million from net
income of $154.6 million in 2000. Our net income of $154.6 million in 2000
increased $25.7 million from net income of $128.9 million in 1999. The
following discussion highlights the factors contributing to these changes.
Utility Operating Revenues
Operating revenues in 2001 decreased from the prior year by $30.5 million
and operating revenues in 2000 increased from the prior year by $23.9 million.
The respective decrease and increase in revenues resulted from the following:
[Enlarge/Download Table]
Increase (Decrease)
---------------------------------
2001 over 2000 2000 over 1999
-------------- --------------
Electric:
Change in retail kWh sales mix - net of fuel......................................... $ 2.6 $ 10.1
Fuel revenue......................................................................... (2.2) 5.1
Wholesale revenue.................................................................... (0.8) 15.2
DSM tracker revenue.................................................................. (1.4) (0.4)
Steam revenue........................................................................ (27.6) (6.7)
Other revenue........................................................................ (1.1) 0.6
---------- ---------
Total change in operating revenues................................................... $ (30.5) $ 23.9
========== =========
The increase in retail kWh sales in 2001 and 2000 primarily was due to
economic growth in Indianapolis. Actual and percentage changes in electric
customers and in heating and cooling degree days for these periods are as
follows:
[Enlarge/Download Table]
Increase (Decrease)
------------------------------------------------
2001 over 2000 2000 over 1999
---------------------- --------------------
Electric Residential Customers...................................... 3,707 0.9% 5,287 1.4%
Commercial & Industrial Customers................................... 777 1.6% 556 1.2%
Heating Degree Days................................................. (520) (9.6)% 532 10.9%
Cooling Degree Days................................................. (121) (12.6)% (218) (18.5)%
The changes in fuel revenues in 2001 and 2000 from the prior year reflect
changes in total fuel costs billed to customers. Wholesale sales were $55.5
million and $56.3 million for 2001 and 2000, respectively. The decrease in
wholesale revenues in 2001 was a result of softer wholesale markets and
increased capacity reserve margins in the Midwest. The increase in wholesale
revenues in 2000 was a result of favorable wholesale market conditions and
generating unit availability. Steam revenues decreased in 2001 as a result of
the sale of thermal assets and associated cessation of steam operations in
2000. See Note 1 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. The
decrease in other revenues during 2001 reflects decreased service revenues.
19
Utility Operating Expenses
Fuel expense decreased in 2001 over 2000 by $8.2 million due to decreases
in both heating degree days (-9.6%) and cooling degree days (-12.6%) as
compared to 2000 and the overall decreased market prices of oil and natural gas
in the fall of 2001 as compared to the same time period in 2000. Fuel expense
increased in 2000 by $16.8 million due primarily to an increase in deferred
fuel cost.
Other operating expenses decreased $26.5 million during 2001 over 2000 due
to a $21.1 million reduction in Administration and General Office Expenses, as
a result of decreases in personnel (net of the Voluntary Early Retirement
Program and the Termination Benefit Agreements), and a $5.3 million reduction
in Purchased Steam due to the sale of IPL's thermal assets. See Notes 1 and 12
to our Consolidated Financial Statements. Other operating expenses increased
$17.1 million in 2000 primarily due to a $6.7 million curtailment loss for the
supplemental retirement plan (see Note 12 in the Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements), rental costs of $3.3 million for portable diesel
generators used to supplement generation during the summer months, decreased
sales of emission allowances of $3.2 million (reduced operating expenses), and
a $2.8 million increase in restricted stock expense due to the increase in the
stock price during 2000.
Power purchased increased by $3.7 million during 2001, primarily due to
obligations associated with our summer peak power contracts in place to limit
market-risk exposure and the corresponding mild summer. Power purchased
decreased by $16.6 million during 2000, primarily because the 1999 totals
reflect the combination of higher market prices for scheduled summer peaking
power and a $13.0 million increase in replacement power costs due to the
unusually high level of generating unit outages during peak electricity demand
in the third quarter of 1999.
Maintenance expenses increased $6.9 million during 2001, primarily due to
the extension of a scheduled outage at our Petersburg Generating Station.
Maintenance expenses increased by $1.8 million during 2000, primarily due to
costs associated with the timing of generating unit overhauls and outages.
A charge of $23.8 million was taken in 2001 relating to two additional
Voluntary Early Retirement Programs (VERP) taken in 2001. See Note 12 in the
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. A charge of $59.4 million was taken
in 2001 relating to the termination of certain employees. A charge of $62.0
million was recorded in 2000 as a result of the Voluntary Early Retirement
Program offered to eligible employees. See Note 12 in the Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements.
Taxes other than Income Taxes decreased by $1.7 million in 2001 over 2000
primarily due to decreased employment taxes associated with workforce
reductions. Taxes other than income taxes increased by $3.2 million during
2000, primarily due to increased property and employment taxes.
Income taxes - net decreased $9.8 million in 2001 over 2000 and decreased
$15.6 million in 2000 over 1999. These changes coincide with the decrease in
pretax operating income each year.
Other Income And Deductions
During 2001, allowance for equity funds used during construction decreased
by $0.7 million, primarily due to a decreased construction base. During 2000,
allowance for equity funds used during construction increased $0.7 million
primarily due to an increased construction base.
Other-net, which includes the pretax income before interest charges of
operations other than IPL, as well as pre-tax non-operating income from IPL,
increased by $6.4 million in 2001 and decreased by $14.7 million during 2000,
as compared to prior years. The increase in 2001 was primarily due to a $3.25
million decrease in charitable contributions at non-utility subsidiaries, an
increase in officer's compensation of $1.93 million at non-utility
subsidiaries, and a decrease in maintenance charges of $5.11 million at
non-utility subsidiaries, all as a result of the sale of thermal assets in 2001
and 2000. See Note 1 of the Consolidated Financial Statements for further
discussion on the sale of non-utility operations. The decrease in 2000 was
primarily due to a $5.8 million increase in outside
20
service expenditures related to our acquisition by AES, a $3.4 million increase
in charitable contributions, the non- recurrence of a $3.2 million insurance
recovery in 1999 and a $1.8 million impairment provision recorded on
non-utility assets offset by a $0.8 million investment distribution. See Note 1
in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
During 2000, we recorded a gain of $30.6 million on the sale of certain
thermal assets. See Note 1 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
During 2000, we recorded a gain, less related compensation expenses and
gross receipts tax, of $102.3 million on the sale of available-for-sale
securities. See Note 15 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Income taxes - net for 2001 decreased by $59.2 million due to charges
associated with one-time items (merger costs, termination benefits, and
voluntary early retirement). See "--Voluntary Early Retirement Program" under
"Overview" in this Analysis and Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial
Statements. Income taxes - net for 2000 increased $50.5 million primarily as a
result of $11.9 million in taxes recorded on the gain on the sale of thermal
assets and $42.2 million in taxes recorded on the sale of available-for-sale
securities. See Note 15 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Interest and Other Charges
Interest on long-term debt decreased by $3.8 million and $8.4 million
during 2001 and 2000, respectively, as compared to prior years. The reduction
in 2001 was primarily due to the lower interest rates on our variable rate
debt, subsequently reset to fixed-rate mode in August 2001. See Note 8 in the
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements. The 2000 decrease was primarily
due to the reduction of the principal amount on our recapitalization debt
facility.
Other interest charges decreased by $0.3 million in 2001 and increased by
$0.2 million in 2000 as compared to prior years. The decrease in 2001 was due
in part to the February, 2001 pay-off and the December, 2001 termination of our
4(2) special-purpose commercial paper program as well as the overall low
interest rate environment in 2001. The increase in 2000 was a result of
moderately higher short-term rates during the calendar year.
Amortization of redemption premiums and expenses on debt - net increased
by $0.2 million in 2001 and decreased by $0.4 million in 2000, respectively, as
compared to prior years. The increase in 2001 was due to amortizing issuance
costs associated with the old notes. The 2000 variance resulted primarily
because the 1999 totals included costs associated with Mid-America Energy
Resources replacement of its $9.5 million 7.25% Series note and its $9.3
million 1995 Series variable rate note with the $18.8 million 1999 Series
variable rate note.
Extraordinary Loss on Early Retirement of Debt - Net of Taxes
During 2000, we recorded an extraordinary loss on the early extinguishment
of debt when Mid-America incurred make-whole payments and wrote off debt
issuance costs of $4.3 million, net of taxes, in connection with the sale of
certain thermal assets. See Notes 1 and 8 in the Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
General
Net cash provided by operating activities was $191.9 million, $186.9
million and $213.8 million for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2001, 2000
and 1999, respectively. Net cash used in financing activities was $75.4
million, $347.4 million and $86.6 million for the fiscal years ended December
31, 2001, 2000 and 1999, respectively. Net cash provided by (used in) investing
activities was $(156.2) million, $205.2 million and $(112.3) million for the
fiscal years ended December 31, 2001, 2000 and 1999, respectively.
21
We are a holding company, and accordingly all cash is generated by the
operating activities of our subsidiaries, principally IPL. None of our
subsidiaries, including IPL, is obligated under the notes being offered by this
prospectus, and none of our subsidiaries will guarantee the notes. Accordingly,
our ability to make payments on the notes will depend not only on the ability
of our subsidiaries to generate cash in the future, but also on the ability of
our subsidiaries to distribute cash to us. IPL's mortgage and deed of trust and
its amended articles of incorporation contain restrictions on IPL's ability to
issue certain securities or pay cash dividends to us. The articles require
that, so long as any shares of preferred stock are outstanding, the net income
of IPL, as specified therein, be at least one and one-half times the total
interest on the funded debt and the pro forma dividend requirements on the
outstanding, and any proposed, preferred stock before any additional preferred
stock is issued. The mortgage requires that net earnings as calculated
thereunder be two and one-half times the annual interest requirements before
additional bonds can be authenticated on the basis of property additions. Based
on IPL's net earnings for the 12 months ended December 31, 2001, the ratios
under the articles and the mortgage are 3.22 and 10.06, respectively. For the
twelve months ending December 31, 2000, the IPL ratios were 3.37 and 10.27,
respectively.
The following restrictions pertain to IPL but, as described in the
preceding paragraph may have an effect on us, to the extent that our ability to
make payments on our indebtedness depends upon IPL earnings. So long as any of
the several series of bonds of IPL issued under its mortgage remains
outstanding, and subject to certain exceptions, IPL is restricted in the
declaration and payment of dividends, or other distribution on shares of its
capital stock of any class, or in the purchase or redemption of such shares, to
the aggregate of its net income, as defined in Section 47 of such mortgage,
after December 31, 1939. The amount which these mortgage provisions would have
permitted IPL to declare and pay as dividends at December 31, 2001, exceeded
retained earnings at that date. In addition, pursuant to IPL's articles, no
dividends may be paid or accrued and no other distribution may be made on IPL's
common stock unless dividends on all outstanding shares of IPL preferred stock
have been paid or declared and set apart for payment.
We believe these requirements will not restrict any anticipated future
financings or cash dividend payments. At December 31, 2001, and considering all
existing restrictions, IPL had the capacity to issue approximately $1.1 billion
of additional long-term debt although it would need regulatory authority to
issue any additional long-term debt.
The principal uses of funds in the year ending December 31, 2001, included
the payment of $29.0 million of common stock dividends to our shareholders
prior to our acquisition by AES and the distribution of $133.0 million in
quarterly dividends to AES. The principal uses of funds in the year ended
December 31, 2000, included retirement of $211.2 million of our commercial
paper. Further, we retired $65.7 million of debt upon sale of the thermal
assets of Mid-America Energy Resources and $16.0 million of debt upon sale of
Indianapolis Campus Energy. Additionally, we retired a total of $57.5 million
short-term debt as it matured. Finally, we paid dividends to common
shareholders of $55.0 million. The principal uses of funds in the year ended
December 31, 1999, included the conclusion of our share repurchase program in
which we repurchased 3.5 million shares of our common stock at a cost of $88.5
million. Additionally, we paid dividends to common shareholders of $50.9
million.
On March 29, 2002, we made a distribution to AES of $51.0 million which
created a deficit in retained earnings.
IPL used a portion of the proceeds received from the sale of its thermal
assets (see Note 8 in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements) to
retire $6.2 million of its 1999 series note in January 2001. IPL has no other
long-term debt that matures during 2002.
On November 20, 2000, we sold the central chilled water cooling and
distribution facility owned by Mid-America Energy Resources and the chilled
water cooling system owned by Indianapolis Campus Energy to Citizens Gas & Coke
Utility. On May 21, 2001, we sold the assets of Cleveland Energy Resources to
Dominion Cleveland Thermal, Inc. As a result of these divestitures, total
capital requirements for Mid-America are expected to be $11.8 million. This
amount includes Mid-America obligations to EnerTech as well as certain retained
liabilities in connection with these asset sales. Ongoing cash requirements are
expected to be funded from existing liquid assets.
22
Additional information regarding our historical cash flows from
operations, investing and financing for the past three years, including the
capital expenditures of IPL and Mid-America, are disclosed in the Statements of
Consolidated Cash Flows and in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Following this offering, our principal uses of cash will be debt service,
capital expenditures and distributions to our parent, AES.
While we believe that our sources of liquidity will be adequate to meet
our needs through the end of 2002, this belief is based on a number of material
assumptions, including, without limitation, assumptions about weather, economic
conditions, credit ratings and environmental pronouncements. If and to the
extent these assumptions prove to be inaccurate, our sources of liquidity may
be affected.
Our non-contingent contractual obligations are set forth below:
[Enlarge/Download Table]
Payment due by period
(in millions)
Less than one year 1 to 3 years 4 to 5 years Over 5 years Total
------------------ --------------------- ------------ ------------ -----
Indebtedness (excluding $0.3 $80.0 $58.8 $1,233.1 $1,372.2
interest)...................
Purchase Obligations(1)....... 9.4 5.8 -- -- 15.2
Construction commitments...... 30.6 -- -- -- 30.6
Operating /Capital Lease
Payments.................... 0.4 1.1 -- -- 1.5
----- ----- ------ -------- --------
Total $40.7 $86.9 $ 58.8 $1,233.1 $1,419.5
===== ===== ====== ======== ========
-------------------
(1) Includes contracts for the purchase of electricity.
Our contingent contractual obligations are set forth below:
[Enlarge/Download Table]
Total Amounts Amount of commitment expiration per period
------------- --------------------------------------------------------
Less than 1
year 1-3 years 4-5 years Over 5 years
----------- --------- --------- ------------
Investment Obligation $9.6 million 1.0 2.0 2.0 4.6
See our discussion under "Overview--Other" for our EnerTech investment.
Debt Service
The notes being offered by this prospectus will mature in 2008 and 2011.
Interest on the notes will be payable semiannually in cash. The notes will
contain customary covenants and events of default. In addition to the notes, we
also have other indebtedness outstanding indirectly through our subsidiaries.
See "Description of Other Indebtedness" for a summary of the key terms,
including interest rates and maturities, of our other material indebtedness.
Capital Expenditures
We spent approximately $126.5 million and $76.1 million on capital
expenditures in 2001 and 2000, respectively.
We spend significant amounts to comply with environmental laws and
regulations. Although we believe, based upon information currently available to
management, that we will not be subject to environmental liabilities which are
likely to have a material adverse effect on us, there can be no assurance that
future costs will not result in a
23
material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations or
liquidity. See "Business--Environmental Matters."
IPL's construction program for the three-year period 2002-2004 is
estimated to cost $393.2 million. The estimated cost of the program by year (in
millions) is $123.0 in 2002, $134.6 in 2003 and $135.6 in 2004. It includes
expenditures for additions, improvements and extensions to transmission and
distribution lines, substations, power factor and voltage regulating equipment,
distribution transformers and street lighting facilities. These projected
amounts include $148.0 million of costs associated with new environmental
standards imposed by the EPA. See "Business--Environmental Matters."
Total capital requirements for Mid-America are expected to be $11.8
million. This amount includes Mid-America obligations to EnerTech as well as
certain retained liabilities in connection with the sale of certain assets. See
"Liquidity and Capital Resources--General."
Distributions
All of our outstanding common stock is held by AES. Distributions to AES
during 2001 were $133 million in regular quarterly dividends. Additionally, the
after-cost proceeds from the offering of the old notes were used to (a) satisfy
our $74 million short-term obligation, and (b) distribute a special, one-time
dividend to AES of $663 million. Recently, on March 29, 2002, we made a
distribution to AES of $51 million which created a deficit in retained
earnings.
Sources of Funds
We believe that business conditions will be such that cash balances, cash
flow from operations and short-term borrowings will be adequate to meet
anticipated short-term future cash requirements, including necessary capital
expenditures related to IPL's construction program and ongoing operations;
however, we may issue long-term debt at the IPL level to fund a portion of its
construction program between 2003 and 2005. See "Liquidity and Capital
Resources--General" and "Capital Expenditures" for a discussion of both of
these issues.
Credit Ratings
Sustaining investment grade debt ratings is a key element in maintaining
adequate liquidity and financial flexibility. In the first half of 2001, IPALCO
and IPL's credit ratings were downgraded as a result of IPALCO's acquisition by
AES, a company with weaker credit characteristics.
The credit ratings of IPALCO and IPL at April 2, 2002 are as follows:
Standard & Poors(S&P) Moody's Fitch
--------------------- ------- -----
IPALCO Senior Secured BBB- Baa1 BBB-
IPALCO Commercial Paper A2 P2 F2
IPL Corporate Credit Rating BBB Baa1
IPL Senior Secured BBB A3 BBB
IPL Senior Unsecured BBB- Baa1 BBB-
IPL Commercial Paper A2 P2/VMIG-2 F2
S&P has indicated that IPALCO and IPL are both on negative credit watch
with regard to their current ratings as a result of current credit and economic
situations facing AES. In the event IPL and IPALCO are downgraded by either S&P
or Fitch, IPL's Senior Unsecured debt and IPALCO's Senior Secured debt would no
longer be
24
investment grade. A change in the rating for IPL to below investment grade at
IPL would trigger certain events of default as described under our discussion
of Credit Agreements, Sale of Accounts Receivable, Remarketing Agreement and
Liquidity Facility. IPL is currently in the process of negotiating the removal
or amendment of these triggers from certain agreements, but there can be no
assurance that such ratings triggers will be removed or amended as requested by
IPL. We believe it is unlikely that the parties to the various agreements and
facilities will take action in the event our credit ratings are downgraded.
Credit Agreements
IPL has entered into a loan agreement with ABN AMRO Bank, N.V. and
National City Bank of Indiana for a loan in the aggregate principal amount of
$30 million. This agreement contains representations, warranties, and
affirmative and negative covenants that IPL considers to be reasonable and
customary. This loan agreement also contains events of default upon the
occurrence of certain events, including an event in which any one of the
unsecured or uncollateralized long-term debt obligations of IPL is not rated at
BBB- or better by Standard & Poor's Corporation, at Baa3 or better by Moody's
Investors Service, or BBB- or better by Duff & Phelps, now known as Fitch. Upon
an event of default, the obligations of the banks to make loans may be
terminated by the banks, and all amounts owing are immediately due and payable.
As of March 31, 2002, there is no outstanding balance on this loan agreement;
however, we do anticipate borrowings on this loan agreement in the near future.
Sale of Accounts Receivable
IPL formed IPL Funding Corporation (IPL Funding) to purchase, on a
revolving basis, up to $50 million of the retail accounts receivable and related
collections of IPL in exchange for a note payable. IPL Funding is not
consolidated by IPL since it meets requirements set forth in Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards ("FAS") No. 140, "Accounting for Transfers and
Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities" to be
considered a qualified special-purpose entity. IPL Funding has entered into a
purchase facility with unrelated parties (Purchasers) pursuant to which the
Purchasers agree to purchase from IPL Funding, on a revolving basis, up to $50
million the receivables purchased from IPL. IPL retains servicing
responsibilities through its role as a collection agent for the amounts due on
the purchased receivables, but may be replaced as collection agent as a result
of IPL's current credit rating. IPL and IPL Funding provide certain indemnities
to the Purchasers, including indemnification in the event that there is a breach
of representations and warranties made with respect to the purchased
receivables.
As a result of IPL's current credit rating, the facility agent has the
ability to require all proceeds of purchased receivables of IPL to be directed
to lock-box accounts that, in the facility agent's discretion, may be under the
control of IPL (as collection agent) or under the control of the facility agent.
In addition, a downgrade of IPL's credit rating below investment grade
constitutes a "termination event" under the purchase facility agreement. Such an
event would give the Purchasers the option to discontinue the purchase of new
receivables and cause all proceeds of the purchased receivables to be used to
reduce the Purchaser's investment and to pay other amounts owed to the
Purchasers and the facility agent, which would have the effect of reducing the
operating capital available to IPL by the aggregate amount of such purchased
receivables. As of March 31, 2002, the aggregate amount of receivables purchased
pursuant to this facility was $50.0 million.
Current Business Outlook
Traditionally, retail kWh sales, after adjustments for weather variations,
have grown in reasonable correlation with growth in service territory economic
activity. During the past 10 years, IPL's retail kWh sales have grown at a
compound annual rate of 2.2%, while the Indianapolis economy grew at an annual
rate of 2.5%.
IPL's wholesale kWh sales decreased 1.4% in 2001 from the level achieved
in 2000, largely as a result of softer wholesale markets and increased capacity
reserve margins in the Midwest. As IPL's retail sales grow, the level of
generating capacity available for wholesale sales is more limited. The ability
to sell power in the highly competitive wholesale market is also highly
dependent on market conditions and the level and frequency of unplanned
outages. We are unable to predict, with any degree of certainty, the level of
wholesale sales that may be achieved in 2002.
25
Operating and maintenance expenses were $697.4 million in 2001. These
expenses in 2002 will be influenced by the level of kWh generation, generating
unit availability and overhaul costs, purchased power costs, cost control
programs and inflation. IPL depends on purchased power, in part, to meet its
retail obligations. Purchased power costs are highly volatile and, therefore,
we are unable to predict with any degree of certainty the level of those costs
for 2002.
Market Risk Disclosure
The primary market risk to which we are exposed is interest rate risk. IPL
uses long-term debt as a primary source of capital in its business.
Historically, a portion of this debt had an interest component that reset on a
periodic basis to reflect current market conditions. Effective December 31,
2000, IPL had $455.3 million in fixed-rate debt and $173.5 million in
variable-rate debt. IPL retired $6.15 million of its variable-rate debt in
January, 2001, then exchanged $127.4 million of variable-rate debt for
fixed-rate debt effective August 1, 2001 (see further discussion below). At
December 31, 2001, IPL had $582.7 million in fixed-rate debt and a $40 million
variable rate debt issue which had been synthetically fixed through a
floating-to-fixed rate swap (also further discussed below). Including our
issuance of the old notes in 2001, the December 31, 2001 weighted average
interest rate for our fixed-rate debt was 7.09% and 1.6% for the variable-rate
debt. The fair value of our fixed-rate and variable-rate long-term debt was $
1.397 billion and $40 million, respectively.
IPL has entered into an interest rate swap. Under this swap, IPL agrees
with a swap counterparty to exchange, at specified intervals, the difference
between fixed-rate and floating-rate interest amounts calculated on an agreed
notional amount. This interest differential paid or received is recognized in
the consolidated statements of income as a component of interest expense.
At December 31, 2001, IPL's current interest rate swap agreement had a
notional amount of $40 million, and it expires in January 2023. IPL agrees to
pay interest at a fixed rate of 5.21% to a swap counter party and receive a
variable rate based on the tax-exempt weekly rate. The fair value of IPL's swap
agreement was $(3.7) million at December 31, 2001. The fair value of IPL's swap
agreement on December 31, 2000 was $(3.1) million.
IPL's reliance on variable rate debt reduced interest expense by averaging
4.27% in 2000 and 3.41% in 1999 (weighted average of 4.25% and 3.37%
respectively), versus a simple average rate of 6.513% on fixed-rate long- term
debt. For the first quarter of 2001, the average interest rate was 3.7% simple
(3.66% weighted). After IPL was downgraded post-acquisition, the
weighted-average variable-rate interest rate increased to 4.73% for April and
May as a direct result of this downgrade. After consulting with remarketing
agent(s) for these issues, and given the low interest rate environment, IPL
determined that fixed-rate debt is the optimal position for IPL. Accordingly,
effective August 1, 2001, IPL reset five of the six variable rate issues
totaling $127.4 million to a semi-annual, fixed-rate mode with the following
coupons:
[Enlarge/Download Table]
Principal Issue Coupon Rate Maturity Date
--------- ----- ----------- -------------
$40,000,000 City of Petersburg, IN (Pollution Control Revenue Bonds, Series 5.750% August 1, 2021
1991)
$20,000,000 City of Petersburg, IN (Solid Waste Revenue Bonds, Series 5.900% December 1, 2024
1994A)
$30,000,000 City of Petersburg, IN (Solid Waste Revenue Bonds, Series 5.950% December 1, 2029
1995C)
$20,000,000 City of Petersburg, IN (Solid Waste Revenue Bonds, Series 6.375% November 1, 2029
1996)
$17,350,000 Indiana Development Finance Authority Exempt Facilities 5.950% August 1, 2030
Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 1999
IPL may nevertheless enter into swap transactions in connection with some
of these fixed-rate, long-term issues to recapture the benefits of a
variable-rate structure. Should IPL elect to do so, IPL will swap the
fixed-rate cash flow for variable-rate cash flow. IPL expects any such swap
transaction to mirror the features of the long-term fixed- rate debt, thereby
enabling IPL to account for the swap under SFAS 133 guidelines as a hedging
instrument.
26
After resetting five of the six variable rate issues to a semi-annual
fixed mode, IPL had $40 million of variable rate debt outstanding at December
31, 2001.
Remarketing Agreement and Liquidity Facility
IPL has entered into a Remarketing Agreement with J.P. Morgan Securities,
Inc. for the weekly remarketing of IPL's $40 million City of Petersburg,
Indiana, Pollution Control Refunding Revenue Bonds Adjustable Rate Tender
Securities (ARTS) Series 1995B, Indianapolis Power & Light Company Project (the
Bonds). J.P. Morgan is obligated to use its best efforts to remarket the Bonds,
but is not obligated to buy or take any position in the Bonds. In addition, one
of the conditions precedent to J.P. Morgan's obligations is that there shall
have been no adverse change in the properties, business, condition (financial
or otherwise) or results of operations of IPL. In the event J.P. Morgan is
unable to remarket the Bonds, there is a liquidity facility in place in the
form of a Credit Agreement with ABN AMRO Bank, N.V. The Trustee for the Bonds
is the only one authorized to request an advance under this facility, and this
is only contemplated in the event of a failed remarketing of the Bonds by J.P.
Morgan. It is an event of default under this Credit Agreement if the S&P Rating
shall be BB+ or lower or the long-term debt securities of IPL shall be unrated
by S&P. S&P Rating is defined as the rating assigned to the senior unsecured
long-term debt securities of IPL without third party credit enhancement.
Accounting Standards
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 133, "Accounting
for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities," requires that an entity
recognize all derivatives as either assets or liabilities on the balance sheet
and measure these instruments at fair value. We adopted SFAS 133 on January 1,
2001. See Note 2 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
In July 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued
SFAS No. 141, "Business Combinations," SFAS No. 142, "Goodwill and Other
Intangible Assets" and SFAS No. 143, "Accounting for Asset Retirement
Obligations". SFAS No. 141 requires business combinations initiated after June
30, 2001, to be accounted for using the purchase method of accounting and
broadens the criteria for recording intangible assets separate from goodwill.
SFAS No. 141 also prohibits the use of pooling-of-interest method for all
business combinations initiated after June 30, 2001.
SFAS No. 142 requires the use of a nonamortization approach to account for
purchased goodwill and certain intangibles. Under a no amortization approach,
goodwill and certain intangibles would not be amortized into results of
operations, but instead would be reviewed for impairment at least annually and
written down and charged to results of operations in the periods in which the
recorded value of goodwill and certain intangibles are determined to be greater
than their fair value. SFAS No. 142 is effective for fiscal years beginning
after December 15, 2001. We do not believe the adoption of SFAS No. 142 will
have any impact on our consolidated financial position or results of operation.
SFAS No. 143 addresses financial accounting and reporting for obligations
associated with retirement of tangible long-lived assets and the associated
asset retirement costs. It requires that the fair value of a liability for an
asset retirement obligation be recognized in the period in which it is incurred
if a reasonable estimate of fair value can be made. The associated asset
retirement costs are capitalized as part of the carrying amount of the
long-lived asset. This statement is effective for fiscal years beginning after
June 15, 2002. We have not determined the impact, if any, that this statement
will have on our consolidated financial position or results of operations.
SFAS No. 144, "Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived
Assets," was issued in August 2001 and addresses accounting for and reporting
of the impairment or disposal of long-lived assets. SFAS No. 144 is effective
for fiscal years beginning after December 31, 2001. We do not believe the
adoption of SFAS No. 144 will have any impact on the consolidated financial
position or results of operations.
27
BUSINESS
Overview
We are a holding company incorporated under the laws of the State of
Indiana on September 14, 1983. Our principal subsidiary is IPL, an electric
utility with its customer base concentrated in Indianapolis, Indiana. Our total
electric revenues during 2001 were approximately $828.0 million and total
assets as of December 31, 2001, were approximately $2.0 billion.
IPL owns and operates two primarily coal-fired generating plants and a
separately-sited combustion turbine that are used for electric generation. IPL
also owns and operates one coal and gas-fired plant. For electric generation,
the total demonstrated net capability is 3,118 megawatts, net winter capability
is 3,129 megawatts and net summer capability is 3,036 megawatts.
On July 15, 2000, we entered into an Agreement and Plan of Share Exchange
with The AES Corporation, a Delaware corporation, whereby AES agreed to acquire
us for 0.463 shares of AES common stock per share of our common stock in a
stock-for-stock transaction valued at approximately $2.15 billion, plus the
assumption of outstanding debt and preferred stock in the aggregate amount of
$890 million. Since March 27, 2001, all of our outstanding common stock has
been held by AES.
On November 20, 2000, we sold certain thermal assets to Citizens Gas &
Coke Utility. These thermal assets included the Perry K Steam Plant and
downtown steam distribution system operated by IPL; the central city chilled
water cooling and distribution system owned by Mid-America Energy Resources,
Inc., and the chilled water cooling system owned by Indianapolis Campus Energy,
Inc. that provides services to Eli Lilly & Company. Both Mid- America Energy
Resources and Indianapolis Campus Energy are subsidiaries of Mid-America.
On May 21, 2001, we sold the assets of Cleveland Energy Resources to
Dominion Cleveland Thermal, Inc., a subsidiary of Dominion Energy, Inc., for
$14.6 million. Cleveland Energy Resources included two subsidiaries of
Mid-America, Cleveland Thermal Energy Corporation and Cleveland District
Cooling Corporation. As a result of these sales, Mid-America is not currently
conducting any business.
Indianapolis Power & Light Company
General
IPL was incorporated under the laws of the State of Indiana in 1926 and is
one of our wholly-owned subsidiaries. IPL is engaged primarily in generating,
transmitting, distributing and selling electric energy in the city of
Indianapolis and neighboring cities, towns, communities, and adjacent rural
areas, all within the State of Indiana, the most distant point being about 40
miles from Indianapolis. It also produced, distributed and sold steam within a
limited area in Indianapolis until November 20, 2000. There have been no other
significant changes in the services rendered, or in the markets or methods of
distribution, since the beginning of the fiscal year. IPL intends to do
business of the same general character as that in which it is now engaged.
Indiana law authorizes electricity suppliers to have exclusive retail service
areas.
IPL's business is not dependent on any single customer or group of
customers. The electric utility business is affected by seasonal weather
patterns throughout the year and, therefore, the operating revenues and
associated operating expenses are not generated evenly by month during the
year. IPL's electricity sales for 1997 through 2001 are set forth in the table
of statistical information included at the end of this section.
IPL's generation, transmission and distribution facilities are described
under "--Properties." IPL's electric system is directly interconnected with the
electric systems of Indiana Michigan Power Company, PSI Energy, Inc., Southern
Indiana Gas and Electric Company, Wabash Valley Power Association, Hoosier
Energy Rural Electric Cooperative, Inc., the Indiana Municipal Power Agency,
West Fork Land Development Company, LLC, and DTE Georgetown, LLC.
28
IPL is also a member of the East Central Area Reliability Group, or ECAR,
and is cooperating under an agreement that provides for coordinated planning of
generation and transmission facilities and the operation of such facilities to
promote reliability of bulk power supply in the nine-state region served by
ECAR. Smaller electric utility systems, independent power producers and power
marketers participate as associate members. See "--Regulatory
Matters--Wholesale Energy Market" for a discussion of our participation in the
Midwest ISO.
Regulation
IPL is subject to regulation by the Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission,
or IURC, as to its services and facilities, the valuation of property, the
construction, purchase, or lease of electric generating facilities, the
classification of accounts, rates of depreciation, rates and charges, the
issuance of securities (other than evidences of indebtedness payable less than
twelve months after the date of issue), the acquisition and sale of public
utility properties or securities and certain other matters. See Note 11 in the
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
In addition, IPL is subject to the jurisdiction of the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, or FERC, with respect to short-term borrowing not
regulated by the IURC, the sale of electricity at wholesale and the
transmission of electric energy in interstate commerce, the classification of
its accounts, and the acquisition and sale of utility property in certain
circumstances as provided by the Federal Power Act.
For a further description of regulatory matters, see "Indianapolis Power &
Light Company--Retail Ratemaking" and "--Regulatory Matters."
Retail Ratemaking
IPL's tariffs for electric service to retail customers (basic rates and
charges) are set and approved by the IURC after public hearings. Such
proceedings, which have occurred at irregular intervals, involve IPL, the staff
of the IURC, the Office of the Indiana Utility Consumer Counselor, as well as
other interested consumer groups and customers. In Indiana, basic rates and
charges are determined after giving consideration, on a pro-forma basis, to all
allowable costs for ratemaking purposes including a fair return on the fair
value of the utility property used and useful in providing service to
customers. Once set, the basic rates and charges authorized do not assure the
realization of a fair return on the fair value of property. Pursuant to
statute, the IURC conducts a periodic review of the basic rates and charges of
all utilities at least once every four years. Other numerous factors including,
but not limited to, weather, inflation, customer growth and usage, the level of
actual maintenance and capital expenditures, fuel costs, generating unit
availability and purchased power costs and availability can affect the return
realized. During 1998, in an order resulting from an IPL initiated proceeding,
the IURC declined to exercise its jurisdiction in part over IPL customers who
voluntarily select service under IPL's Elect Plan options. Under two of these
options, the customer's prices are not adjusted for changes in fuel costs or
other factors. The Elect Plan will expire on December 31, 2003, unless a
subsequent plan is approved by the IURC. Substantially all other IPL customers
are served pursuant to retail tariffs that provide for the monthly billing or
crediting to customers of increases or decreases, respectively, in the actual
costs of fuel consumed from estimated fuel costs embedded in base tariffs,
subject to certain restrictions on the level of operating income. Additionally,
most such retail tariffs provide for billing of "lost revenue margins" on
estimated kilowatt-hour (kWh) sales reductions along with current and deferred
costs resulting from IPL's IURC-approved demand side management programs. IPL
maintains its books and records consistent with generally accepted accounting
principles reflecting the impact of regulation. See Note 2 in the Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements.
Future events, including the advent of retail competition within IPL's
service territory, could result in the deregulation of part of IPL's existing
regulated businesses. Upon deregulation, adjustments to IPL's accounting
records may be required to eliminate the historical impact of regulatory
accounting. Such adjustments, as required by Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 101, "Regulated Enterprises--Accounting for the Discontinuation
of Application of FASB Statement No. 71," would eliminate the "effects of any
actions of regulators that have been recognized as assets and liabilities . .
." Required adjustments could include the expensing of any unamortized net
regulatory assets, the elimination of certain tax liabilities, and a write down
of any impaired utility plant balances. IPL does not expect to be required to
adopt SFAS 101 in the near term.
29
Fuel
In 2001, approximately 99% of the total kWh produced by IPL were generated
from coal. Natural gas and No. 2 fuel oil combined to provide the remaining kWh
generation. Natural gas is used in IPL's newer combustion turbines. In addition
to use in oil-fired steam turbine generating units, three older combustion
turbines, and as an alternate fuel in two newer combustion turbines, fuel oil
is used for start up and flame stabilization in coal-fired generating units.
IPL's long-term coal contracts provide for the major portion of its
requirements through the year 2005. The long-term coal agreements are with five
suppliers and the coal is mined entirely in the state of Indiana. Approximately
50% of our coal is from one supplier. IPL has entered into three contracts with
this supplier for the provision of coal from three separate mines. It is
presently believed that all coal used by IPL will be mined by others. IPL
normally carries fuel oil and a 30-60 day system supply of coal to offset
unforeseen occurrences such as labor disputes, equipment breakdowns and power
sales to other utilities.
Employee Relations
As of December 31, 2001, IPL had 1,341 employees of whom 732 were
represented by the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, AFL-CIO, or
IBEW, and 195 were represented by the Electric Utility Workers Union, or EUWU,
an independent labor organization. In September 1999, the membership of the
IBEW ratified a labor agreement that remains in effect until December 16, 2002.
The agreement provides for general pay adjustments of 4% in December 1999, 2%
in December 2000 and 2% in December 2001, and changes in pension and health
care coverage. In April 2000, the membership of the EUWU ratified a labor
agreement that became effective on February 26, 2001, and extends through
February 23, 2004. The agreement provides for general pay adjustments of 2% in
each of the periods February 2001, February 2002 and February 2003, as well as
changes in pension and health care coverage.
On November 9, 2000, we implemented a Voluntary Early Retirement Program
(VERP I) which offered enhanced retirement benefits upon early retirement to
eligible employees. The program was available to all employees, except
officers, whose combined age and years of service totaled at least 75 on June
30, 2001. Participation was limited to, and subsequently accepted by 400
qualified employees, 146 of whom were IBEW members and 72 of whom were EUWU
members. Participants elected actual retirement dates in 2001. In addition,
individuals in key senior management positions terminated employment in
conjunction with the final approval and closing of our agreement with AES.
Those individuals received separation benefits as described in "Management's
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations--Acquisition by AES."
On June 1, 2001, we implemented a second Voluntary Early Retirement
Program (VERP II) to 225 individuals, offering substantially the same
retirement benefits upon early retirement to all employees, except officers,
whose combined age and years of service totaled at least 75 on June 30, 2001.
Upon expiration of the revocation period on July 23, 2001, the offer under this
program was accepted by 141 individuals, who will take retirement dates between
August 1, 2001 and August 1, 2004. Of these 141 individuals, 61 retired during
2001. Our pre-tax expense for this program was $19.8 million.
On September 14, 2001, we approved a third Voluntary Early Retirement
Program (VERP III) limited to personnel at our Petersburg Generating Station.
This program offered substantially the same retirement benefits upon early
retirement to all eligible employees, except officers, whose combined age and
years of service totaled at least 72 on December 31, 2001. Upon expiration of
the revocation period on October 31, 2001, nine employees accepted VERP III.
Our pretax expense for this program was $4.0 million.
30
Statistical Information on Electric Operations
The following table of statistical information presents additional data on
our electric operations:
[Enlarge/Download Table]
Year Ended December 31,
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
2001(1) 2000(1) 1999(1) 1998(1) 1997(1)
----------- --------- ---------- -------- --------
Operating Revenues (In Thousands):
Residential......................... $ 289,779 $ 285,000 $ 282,254 $269,351 $261,832
Small industrial and commercial..... 127,863 130,482 127,027 122,082 125,131
Large industrial and commercial..... 334,387 337,725 328,903 321,103 306,761
Public lighting..................... 10,415 10,249 10,386 9,754 9,324
Miscellaneous....................... 10,091 11,153 10,600 12,469 12,050
--------- --------- -------- -------- --------
Revenues - ultimate consumers.... 772,535 774,609 759,170 734,759 715,098
Sales for resale - REMC............. 1,367 1,222 1,035 936 1,082
Sales for resale - other............ 54,144 55,124 40,132 50,140 21,954
--------- --------- -------- -------- --------
Total electric revenues.......... $ 828,046 $ 830,955 $800,337 $785,835 $738,134
========= ========= ======== ======== ========
Kilowatt-hour Sales (In Millions):
Residential......................... 4,717 4,614 4,510 4,359 4,276
Small industrial and commercial..... 1,955 1,990 1,928 1,888 1,969
Large industrial and commercial..... 7,337 7,432 7,187 7,138 6,857
Public lighting..................... 72 71 73 71 69
--------- --------- -------- -------- --------
Sales - ultimate consumers....... 14,081 14,107 13,698 13,456 13,171
Sales for resale - REMC............. 46 42 33 31 29
Sales for resale - other............ 2,129 2,272 1,968 2,252 1,111
--------- --------- -------- -------- --------
Total kilowatt-hours sold........ 16,256 16,421 15,699 15,739 14,311
========= ========= ======== ======== ========
Customers at End of Period:
Residential......................... 394,793 391,086 385,799 379,943 374,686
Small industrial and commercial..... 43,767 43,078 42,610 42,230 41,137
Large industrial and commercial..... 4,283 4,195 4,107 4,036 3,960
Public lighting..................... 622 574 509 445 357
--------- --------- -------- -------- --------
Total ultimate consumers......... 443,465 438,933 433,025 426,654 420,140
Sales for resale-- REMC............. 1 1 1 1 1
--------- --------- -------- -------- --------
Total electric customers......... 443,466 438,934 433,026 426,655 420,141
========= ========= ======== ======== ========
-------------------
(1) Includes estimated electric operating revenue and
kilowatt-hour sales for services delivered but not billed during the
period. See Note 2 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Mid-America
General
As of December 31, 2001, Mid-America, the holding company for our
unregulated activities, had as a subsidiary Cleveland Energy Resources.
Cleveland Energy Resources included two additional subsidiaries of Mid-
America: Cleveland Thermal Energy Corporation and Cleveland District Cooling
Corporation. Cleveland Thermal owned and operated two steam plants in
Cleveland, Ohio. Cleveland Cooling owned and operated a district cooling
facility located near downtown Cleveland, which distributes chilled water to
subscribers located downtown for their air conditioning needs. On May 21, 2001,
we sold the assets of Cleveland Energy Resources to Dominion Cleveland Thermal,
Inc., a subsidiary of Dominion Energy, Inc. The selling price for the assets
was $14.6 million. The completion of the transaction had no significant income
statement impact.
31
Mid-America also made investments in entities that are not operating
subsidiaries. At December 31, 2001, it had an investment in Internet Capital
Group, Inc. (Nasdaq: ICGE), EnerTech Capital Partners II L.P., a venture
capital fund, and essential.com. We recently received notification that
essential.com filed for bankruptcy protection in the United States Bankruptcy
Court for the District of Massachusetts, Eastern Division. Accordingly, we will
write-off our investment by $420,000 in the first quarter of 2002.
Employees
Due to the sale of Cleveland Energy Resources in the first half of 2001,
Mid-America no longer has employees.
Properties
Our executive offices are located at One Monument Circle, Indianapolis,
Indiana. This facility also houses certain administrative operations of certain
of our other subsidiaries. This facility, and the remainder of our material
properties in our business and operations are owned directly by IPL. The
following is a description of these material properties.
IPL owns two distribution service centers in Indianapolis at 1230 West
Morris Street and 3600 North Arlington Avenue. IPL's customer service center is
located at 2102 North Illinois Street in Indianapolis.
IPL owns and operates two primarily coal-fired generating plants and a
separate combustion turbine which are used for electric generation. IPL also
owns and operates one combination coal and gas-fired plant. For electric
generation, the total demonstrated net capability is 3,118 MW, net winter
capability is 3,129 MW and net summer capability is 3,036 MW.
IPL's sources of electric generation are as follows:
o Eagle Valley Plant, formerly known as the H. T. Pritchard plant,
located 25 miles southwest of Indianapolis (seven units in
service-one each in 1949, 1950, 1951, 1956 and 1967 and two in
1953) with 367 MW demonstrated net capability and net winter and
summer capabilities of 344 MW and 341 MW, respectively;
o Harding Street Station, formerly known as the E. W. Stout plant,
located in the southwest part of Marion County (eleven units in
service-one each in 1941, 1947, 1958, 1961, 1967, 1994 and 1995
and four in 1973) with 955 MW demonstrated net capability and
net winter and summer capabilities of 1,013 MW and 944 MW,
respectively;
o Petersburg Plant, located in Pike County, Indiana (seven units
in service-four in 1967 and one each in 1969, 1977 and 1986)
with 1,716 MW demonstrated net capability and net winter and
summer capabilities of 1,672 MW; and
o Georgetown Combustion Turbine, located in Pike Township on the
northwest side of Indianapolis, Indiana (one unit in service-May
2000) with 80 MW nameplate rating and net winter and summer
capabilities of 100 MW and 79 MW, respectively.
Net electrical generation during 2001, at the Petersburg, Harding Street
and Eagle Valley plants accounted for approximately 67.5%, 24.5% and 8.0%,
respectively, of IPL's total net generation.
Included in the above totals are three gas turbine units at the Harding
Street plant added in 1973, one gas turbine added in 1994 and one gas turbine
added in 1995 with a combined nameplate rating of 214 MW. Also included is one
diesel unit each at Eagle Valley and Harding Street plants and three diesel
units at Petersburg station, all added in 1967. Each diesel unit has a
nameplate rating of 3 MW.
32
See the discussion under "Related Party Transactions - Combustion Turbine
Acquisition" for a discussion of a new combustion turbine expected to be in
service during the second quarter of 2002.
IPL's transmission system includes 457 circuit miles of 345,000 volt
lines, 359 circuit miles of 138,000 volt lines and 269 miles of 34,500 volt
lines. Underground distribution and service facilities include 623 miles of
conduit and 6,789 wire miles of conductor. Underground street lighting
facilities include 94 miles of conduit and 2,053 wire miles of conductor. Also
included in the system are 75 bulk power substations and 86 distribution
substations.
Other properties include coal and other minerals underlying 798 acres in
Sullivan County, Indiana, and coal underlying about 6,215 acres in Pike and
Gibson Counties, Indiana. IPL owns approximately 4,067 acres in Morgan County,
Indiana and approximately 884 acres in Switzerland County, Indiana, for future
plant sites.
All critical facilities owned by IPL are well maintained, in good
condition and meet the present needs of IPL.
The mortgage and deed of trust of IPL, together with the supplemental
indentures thereto, secure first mortgage bonds issued by IPL. Pursuant to the
terms of the mortgage, substantially all property owned by IPL is subject to a
direct first mortgage lien.
Environmental Matters
We are subject to various federal, state and local environmental
protection and health and safety laws and regulations governing, among other
things, the generation, storage, handling, use, disposal and transportation of
hazardous materials; the emission and discharge of hazardous materials into the
environment; and the health and safety of our employees. These laws and
regulations often require a lengthy and complex process of obtaining and
renewing permits and other governmental authorizations from federal, state and
local agencies. A violation of these laws, regulations or permits can result in
substantial fines, other sanctions, permit revocation and/or facility
shutdowns. We believe that we operate in material compliance with environmental
laws, regulations and permits. We cannot assure you, however, that we have been
or will be at all times in compliance with such laws, regulations and permits.
Under certain environmental laws, we could be held responsible for all of
the costs relating to any contamination at our or our predecessors' past or
present facilities and at third party waste disposal sites. We could also be
held liable for any and all consequences arising out of human exposure to such
contamination or other hazardous substances or for other environmental damage.
We cannot assure you that our costs of complying with current and future
environmental and health and safety laws, and our liabilities arising from past
or future releases of, or exposure to, hazardous substances will not adversely
affect our business, results of operations or financial condition.
In late 1990, Congress passed the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990, which
affect both new and existing facilities. The Clean Air Act and many state laws
require significant reductions in sulfur dioxide, particulate matter, and
nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions that result from burning fossil fuels. The
following is a discussion of specific areas under or related to the Clean Air
Act that affect our business.
NOx SIP Call
On October 27, 1998, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, or the EPA,
issued a final rule, referred to as the NOx SIP call, calling for Indiana,
along with 21 other states in the eastern third of the United States and the
District of Columbia, to impose more stringent limits on nitrogen oxides (NOx)
emissions from fossil fuel-fired steam electric generators, including those
operated by IPL. On March 3, 2000, the Court of Appeals for the District of
Columbia Circuit issued a decision largely upholding the NOx SIP call, and a
petition for review by the United States Supreme Court was later denied. Minor
aspects of the rule were later remanded to the EPA by the Court of Appeals for
the District of Columbia Circuit in a related case. IPL lodged a separate
challenge to the NOx SIP call in the Court of Appeals for the District of
Columbia Circuit, insofar as it affects Indiana plants, following the EPA's
December 26, 2000, finding that eleven states, including Indiana, failed to
make timely submissions in response to
33
the NOx SIP call. That challenge has survived the EPA's motion for summary
affirmance and has been briefed on the merits. Oral argument is scheduled for
May 16, 2002. It is not possible to predict the outcome of the lawsuit.
The EPA's NOx SIP call would require operators of coal-fired electric
utility boilers in the affected states and the District of Columbia to limit
NOx emissions to 0.15 pounds per million BTUs of heat input as a system-wide
average during the annual ozone season, which extends from the beginning of May
through the end of September of each year. That limit calls for a reduction of
about 85% from 1990 average emissions from coal-fired electric utility boilers,
and a reduction during the ozone season of about 57% from our current
emissions.
The final requirements of the NOx SIP call, and the timing of and the
costs to comply with it, are subject to the success of any further judicial
review. Our current estimates are that the NOx SIP call would necessitate
additional capital expenditures of approximately $120 million to achieve the
majority of IPL required NOx emission reductions. This amount has been included
in our 2002-2005 construction program. The intent is to purchase the remaining
NOx emission allowances in the market. There has been precedent set in the
state of Indiana that allows a tracker for a return on the capital investment
for clean coal technology, which includes capital expenditures for NOx
compliance. IPL is anticipating that a tracker may also be allowed for the
sharing of the NOx emission allowance expense.
As to timing, the requirements of the NOx SIP call became effective during
2001 and will necessitate deployment of capital during the period between 2001
and 2005, with compliance required by May 31, 2004. We do not expect the
installation of control technology associated with the NOx SIP call to
significantly disrupt our plant operations. See "Management's Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations--Liquidity and
Capital Resources--Capital Expenditures."
The above estimates will be refined as engineering studies progress.
National Ambient Air Quality Standards
On July 16, 1997, the EPA promulgated final rules tightening the National
Ambient Air Quality Standards for ozone and creating new fine particulate
matter standards. In May 1999, the EPA issued its final guidelines for the
revised ground-level ozone and particulate matter, which further delineated the
so-called "non-attainment regions" and other non-attainment classifications. In
February 2001, the United States Supreme Court upheld the ozone and particulate
matter standards, but held that the EPA's policy of implementing the new ozone
standard in non- attainment areas was unlawful. If the EPA develops an
interpretation of this standard with respect to non-attainment regions that is
consistent with the Supreme Court's decision, our plants may be faced with
further emission reduction requirements that could necessitate the installation
of additional control technology, increased capital expenditures and related
operating costs.
State of Indiana Ozone Plans
During 2001, the Indiana Air Pollution Control Board adopted rules
requiring significant reductions in NOx emissions from fossil fuel-fired
electric generating units to be achieved by May 2004. The EPA approved of
Indiana's NOx rules on November 8, 2001. The rules are, among other things,
Indiana's means of complying with EPA's NOx SIP call described above. The new
NOx rules require coal-fired electric generating units to reduce NOx emissions
to a system-wide average of 0.15 pounds of NOx per million BTUs of heat input
during the annual ozone season, amounting to an 85% reduction from 1990
emissions for the average unit and a reduction of 57% for IPL's coal-fired
units. Our NOx SIP call budget of approximately $120.0 million is expected to
bring our units into compliance with these requirements.
As stated above, IPL has challenged the NOx SIP call in the Court of
Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Should this challenge be
successful, the court's ruling could serve as a basis for challenging Indiana's
new NOx rules in state court. The outcome of this lawsuit and any future state
lawsuits cannot be predicted at this time. See "--NOx SIP Call" above.
34
Section 126 Petitions
In February 1998, eight northeastern states filed petitions seeking the
EPA's assistance in reducing ozone in the eastern U.S. under Section 126 of the
Clean Air Act. The EPA believes that Section 126 petitions allow a state to
claim that sources in another state are contributing to its air quality problem
and request the EPA to require the upwind sources to reduce their emissions. In
December 1999, the EPA granted four Section 126 petitions relating to NOx
emissions. On May 15, 2001, the U.S. Appeals Court for the District of Columbia
Circuit upheld the EPA rule requiring some power plants in the Midwest to
reduce nitrogen oxide emissions. This ruling does not currently affect our
Indiana fossil fuel-fired plants. However, we cannot assure you that our plants
will not be affected by these Section 126 petitions in the future.
New Source Review
The EPA has commenced an investigation of the fossil fuel-fired electric
power generation industry to determine compliance with environmental
requirements under the Clean Air Act associated with repairs, maintenance,
modifications and operational changes made to facilities over the years. The
EPA's focus is on whether the changes were subject to new source review or new
source performance standards, and whether best available control technology was
or should have been installed. The EPA has required us to provide extensive
information regarding our maintenance modification and operational activities
over the last quarter century. In late 2000, we sent the EPA the last batch of
information responding to its request under the Clean Air Act and since then,
we have received no further communication from the EPA.
Regional Haze
The EPA published the final regional haze rule on July 1, 1999. This rule
established planning and emission reduction timelines for states to use to
improve visibility in national parks throughout the U.S. On June 22, 2001, the
EPA signed a proposed rule to guide states in implementing the 1999 rule and in
controlling power plant emissions that cause regional haze problems. The
proposed rule set guidelines for states in setting best available retrofit
technology, or BART, at older power plants. The ultimate effect of the new
regional haze rule could be requirements for (1) newer and cleaner technologies
and additional controls on conventional particulates, and (2) reductions in
SO2, NOx and particulate matter emissions from utility sources. If the proposed
rules are finalized and utility emissions reductions are required, the
compliance cost could be significant. At this time, we cannot, however,
estimate the costs to comply with the final regional haze rule.
Global Warming
Global warming continues to be a concern. The U.S. and other countries
have signed the Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on
Climate Change, which, if ratified, would require the U.S. and other countries
to make substantial reductions in "greenhouse gas" emissions. While it seems
unlikely the Kyoto Protocol will be ratified by the U.S. under the Bush
Administration, global warming remains a policy issue that is regularly
considered for possible government regulation and if legislation requiring
reductions in greenhouse gases is adopted, such legislation could substantially
affect both the costs and the operating characteristics of our fossil
fuel-fired plants.
Mercury
In December 2000, the EPA announced it would adopt rules to regulate
mercury emission from coal-fired power plants. These regulations are expected
to be proposed by December 2003, with final regulations by December 2004 and
reductions required by 2010. Once these final regulations are issued, the use
of "maximum available control technology," or MACT, i.e. the process that
produces the greatest emissions reductions, regardless of economic, chemical
and physical constraints, may be required to control these emissions. We cannot
predict the outcome or effects of the EPA's determination and any subsequent
regulation.
* * *
35
In summary, environmental laws and regulations presently require
substantial capital expenditures and operating costs. Our capital expenditures
relating to environmental matters were $4.4 million in 1999, $8.2 million in
2000 and $14 million in 2001. We expect to incur approximately $120.0 million
of capital expenditures for NOx and $28.0 million for other environmental
capital expenditures to comply with environmental control standards and
enhanced pollution control during 2002 through 2005. In addition, environmental
laws are complex, change frequently and have tended to become stringent over
time. As a result, our operating expenses and continuing capital expenditures
may increase. More stringent standards may also limit our operating
flexibility. Because other electric power plants will have similar
restrictions, we believe that compliance with more stringent environmental laws
and regulations is not likely to affect our competitive position. However,
these costs could adversely affect our financial condition, liquidity and
results of operations, and we cannot assure you that such costs will not be
material.
Regulatory Matters
We are subject, through IPL, to extensive regulation. IPL is a regulated
public utility and is principally engaged in providing electric service to the
Indianapolis metropolitan area. As a regulated entity, IPL is required to use
certain accounting methods prescribed by regulatory bodies which may differ
from those accounting methods required to be used by nonregulated entities.
IPL is subject to extensive regulation at both the federal and state
level. IPL is substantially affected by the regulatory jurisdiction of the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,
or FERC, at the federal level and the Indiana Department of Environmental
Management and the Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission, commonly referred to
as the IURC, at the state level. Other significant regulatory agencies
affecting IPL include, but are not limited to, the U.S. Department of Labor and
the Indiana Occupational Safety and Health Administration. The regulatory power
of the IURC over IPL is both comprehensive and typical of the economic
regulation generally imposed by state public utility commissions over
investor-owned utilities.
An inherent business risk facing any regulated public utility is that of
unexpected or adverse regulatory action. Regulatory discretion is reasonably
broad in Indiana, as elsewhere. Therefore, IPL attempts to work cooperatively
with regulators and those who participate in the regulatory process, while
remaining vigilant and steadfast in protecting IPL's legal rights in the
regulatory process. IPL takes an active role in addressing regulatory policy
issues in the current regulatory environment, which is subject to rapid change
in large part because of the trend toward restructuring of the United States
electric utility industry and increased activity by environmental regulators.
On February 1, 2002, IPL filed a petition with the IURC for a certificate
of public convenience and necessity for the construction and use of clean coal
technology to allow IPL to meet the NOx emission limits imposed pursuant to
EPA's NOx SIP Call. IPL seeks IURC approval of the use of qualified pollution
control property as defined in I.C. 8-1-2-6.6 and approval of ratemaking
treatment for the construction costs under the same statute. A prehearing
conference is scheduled for April 9, 2002, to determine a procedural schedule.
See "Environmental Matters--NOx SIP Call."
Elect Plan
In 1998, the IURC approved a plan that allows IPL to offer customers with
less than 2,000 kilowatts of demand an opportunity to choose from optional
payment or service plans. IPL's authority to offer these options will expire on
December 31, 2003, and any contracts entered into thereunder must terminate on
or before that date unless a subsequent plan is approved by the IURC.
Under the plan, eligible IPL customers may enter into written contracts
for:
o Fixed Rate-Pay a guaranteed fixed rate per unit of consumption for
one or more years.
o Green Power-Purchase environmentally friendly or "green" power.
36
Additionally, residential customers may choose a "Sure Bill" option,
paying the same bill each month for 12 months, regardless of how much
electricity is used. Customers not choosing one of these options continue to
receive electric service under existing tariffs. See "Business--Indianapolis
Power & Light Company--Retail Ratemaking."
Authorized Annual Operating Income
During quarterly fuel adjustment clause proceedings, the annual
jurisdictional operating income of IPL's electric business is subject to
review. Customer refunds could result if actual annual jurisdictional operating
income exceeds levels authorized by the IURC. See Note 2 in the Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements. IPL does not anticipate any customer refunds
to result from such reviews during 2002.
Competition and Industry Changes
In recent years, various forms of proposed industry-restructuring
legislation and/or rulemakings have been introduced at the federal level and in
several states. Generally, the intent of these initiatives is to encourage an
increase in competition within the regulated electric utility industry. While
federal rulemaking to date has addressed only the electric wholesale market,
various state legislatures are considering or have enacted new laws impacting
the retail energy markets within their respective states. A discussion of the
legislative and regulatory initiatives most likely to affect IPL follows:
Wholesale Energy Market
In April 1996, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, or FERC, issued
Order Nos. 888 and 889 concerning open access transmission service. These
Orders require each utility under FERC jurisdiction that owns, operates or
controls interstate transmission facilities, and which otherwise does not
secure a waiver, to, among other things: (1) file an open access
non-discriminatory transmission tariff with FERC that conforms with FERC's pro
forma tariff; (2) offer open access non-discriminatory transmission and
ancillary services to eligible customers under rates, terms and conditions
comparable to the transmission and ancillary services that it provides itself;
(3) arrange for transmission and ancillary services under the tariff for its
new wholesale sales and certain new wholesale purchases of electricity; (4)
adhere to standards of conduct that separate the transmission provider's
transmission function from its generation marketing function; (5) develop and
maintain an open access same-time information system ("OASIS") to give existing
and potential transmission users the same access to transmission information
that the utility enjoys; and (6) adhere to specified standards and protocols
for its OASIS system. These Orders provide that a transmission provider's pro
forma tariff may be used by wholesale transmission customers, as well as retail
transmission customers that are able to receive unbundled retail transmission
either voluntarily from the transmission provider or as a result of a state
retail access program. The Orders also establish the criteria for
distinguishing between FERC-jurisdictional unbundled retail transmission
facilities and state-jurisdictional unbundled retail distribution facilities.
The requirement to comply with Order Nos. 888 and 889 was stayed as to IPL in
1996. Subsequently, in January 2000, IPL filed its open access transmission
service tariff with FERC. At the same time, IPL filed with FERC a request to
sell power at wholesale at market-based rates, which FERC accepted.
Order No. 888 also affords utilities the opportunity to seek
extra-contractual recovery of legitimate, prudent and verifiable stranded costs
from certain departing wholesale power purchase customers that executed power
purchase contracts on or before July 11, 1994, and from certain
retail-turned-wholesale transmission customers, as well as the opportunity to
seek recovery of stranded costs caused by retail wheeling in circumstances in
which the transmission provider's state regulatory authority does not have
authority to address retail stranded costs at the time the retail wheeling is
required. The Order provides that stranded costs are to be calculated based on
the difference between the revenues expected to be received by the utility from
the departing customer and the market value of the stranded generation over the
period of time that the utility could have reasonably expected to serve the
departing customer.
Order Nos. 888 and 889 were, for the most part, upheld by the United
States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, and certain
aspects of Order No. 888 were appealed to the United States Supreme Court. The
37
Supreme Court affirmed the judgment of the Court of Appeals. The Supreme Court
ruled that FERC correctly concluded that it has jurisdiction over interstate
transmission service that has been unbundled and sold separately from the sale
of electric energy to a retail customer, and that FERC's choice not to assert
jurisdiction over bundled retail transmission represented a statutorily
permitted policy choice. The Supreme Court ruled that FERC explicitly reserved
decision on this jurisdictional issue. The decision raises the possibility that
FERC may be able to assert jurisdiction over bundled retail transmission sale
if FERC finds this necessary in order to eliminate undue discrimination in
retail markets. Three Justices dissented from the opinion, and stated that FERC
did not adequately justify its decision not to assert jurisdiction over bundled
retail transmission.
In December 1999, FERC issued Order No. 2000, which, among other things,
encourages the voluntary formation of regional transmission organizations,
commonly referred to as RTOs, entities created to operate, plan and control
and/or own transmission assets. Order No. 2000 also prescribes certain minimum
characteristics and functions of acceptable RTO proposals; provides a
collaborative process by which public utilities and non-public utilities that
own, operate or control interstate transmission facilities will consider and
develop RTOs; includes a proposal to consider transmission ratemaking reforms
on a case-specific basis; and provides an opportunity for certain non-monetary
regulatory benefits. Order No. 2000 required all public utilities (excluding
certain utilities participating in an approved regional transmission entity
that conforms to the FERC's independent system operator principles, which
utilities were required to make an alternative filing by January 15, 2001) that
own, operate or control interstate transmission to file in October 2000, either
a proposal to join an RTO by December 15, 2001 or the reasons for not
participating in an RTO (as well as its plans, if any, for further work towards
participating in an RTO). IPL made its Order 2000 compliance filing in October
2000, stating that at that time it did not plan to join an RTO. Subsequently,
in February 2001, IPL submitted an application to join the Midwest Independent
System Operator (ISO), which has filed an application with FERC seeking
recognition as an RTO under Order No. 2000. In December 2001 FERC granted IPL's
request to transfer control over its transmission facilities to the Midwest
ISO, and granted the Midwest ISO's application to be recognized as an RTO. The
Midwest ISO has commenced operations. FERC has indicated that it may be
necessary to expand the geographic scope of proposed RTOs.
Certain aspects of Order No. 2000 are currently on appeal to the United
States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. One group of
petitioners challenge FERC's rulings that RTOs must have independent and
exclusive authority under Federal Power Act Section 205 to file tariff rates
applicable to transmission services; a second group similarly seeks review of
FERC's rulings on the abilities of parties to limit by contract an RTO's
ability to make unilateral tariff modifications, as well as the Order's open
architecture policy and its impact on transmission owners' rights with respect
to transmission expansions or interconnections; a third petitioner contends
that FERC lacks substantial basis in evidence for its conclusion that
transmission- owning utilities may retain up to 100% passive ownership in an
RTO; and a fourth petitioner argues that FERC erred by failing to consider or
require evidence on the costs and benefits of an RTO in the Pacific Northwest
when it imposed its RTO rulemaking nationwide.
Retail Energy Market
The legislatures of several states have enacted, and many other states are
considering, new laws that would allow various forms of competition for retail
sales of electric energy. While each state proposal is different, most provide
for some recovery of a utility's stranded costs and require an extended
transition period before competition is fully effective. Additionally, a few
states have implemented pilot programs that experiment with allowing some form
of customer choice of electricity suppliers.
In Indiana, competition among electric energy providers for sales has
focused primarily on the sale of bulk power to other public and municipal
utilities. Indiana law provides for electricity suppliers to have exclusive
retail service areas.
In 1995, the Indiana General Assembly, anticipating increasing competitive
forces in the regulated public utility industry, enacted I.C. 8-1-2.5. This law
enables the IURC to consider and approve, on an individual utility basis,
utility-initiated proposals wherein the IURC declines to exercise jurisdiction
over the whole or any part of the utility, or its retail energy service or
both. The IPL Elect Plan was approved by the IURC under this law.
38
During 1997, the Indiana General Assembly authorized a legislative study
committee to assess the issue of electric utility competition and
restructuring. A comprehensive restructuring bill was introduced in the Indiana
Senate in 1998, but failed to pass. Subsequently, comprehensive restructuring
bills were submitted in both 1999 and 2000, and also failed to pass. There was
no restructuring legislation submitted in Indiana in 2001. Legislation was
submitted in Indiana in 2002, but failed to pass.
Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission Investigation
On July 25, 2001, the IURC commenced a formal investigation regarding
IPL's provision of service to its customers. Two days later, the IURC expressed
its concern about the length of time it had taken IPL to restore service after
two successive storms on July 8, 2001, caused major power outages. These were
the worst storms we had experienced since 1992. On February 6, 2002, the IURC
issued an order approving a Stipulation and Settlement Agreement (the
"Settlement Agreement") entered into by IPL, the Indiana Office of Utility
Consumer Counselor, and two intervening parties. The Settlement Agreement
provides for:
o performance measures for system reliability and customer call center
performance;
o penalties up to $7 million annually, or up to $1.75 million per
quarter, for failure to meet the performance measures;
o quarterly reporting regarding service reliability and call center
performance, and reporting following any storm event;
o upgrading or replacing IPL's Outage Management System and Energy
Management System at a cost of approximately $6 million; and
o provision of a $100 credit to residential customers whose service was
interrupted during and immediately after the July 8, 2001 storms for
36 to 48 hours. IPL had already provided a similar credit to
residential customers whose service had been interrupted for more
than 48 hours. In addition IPL will hire an independent auditor to
review its quarterly reports to the IURC. To date IPL has issued
credits of approximately $2.0 million to customers affected by the
storms of July 8, 2001. We estimate total credits will be
approximately $2.5 million.
Recent IURC Order
On May 24, 2001, the IURC on its own motion initiated an industry-wide
investigation into the continuing propriety of provisions in utility tariffs
that limit a utility's liability to its customers for interruptions in service.
IPL has such provisions in its tariff for retail service as do most Indiana
public utilities. On March 6, 2002, the IURC issued an order purporting to find
any and all language in tariffs on file with the IURC which limit a utility's
liability for service interruptions to be void and purporting to strike such
provisions from the tariffs of all Indiana public utilities. The IURC issued
this order without holding an evidentiary hearing. It is expected that an
appeal of this order will be taken to an appellate court. Although we cannot
predict the impact this order could have on IPL or IPALCO, if this order is
upheld it could have a material adverse effect on us.
Legal Proceedings
IPL has been named as a defendant in approximately 45 lawsuits alleging
personal injury or wrongful death stemming from exposure to asbestos and
asbestos containing products formerly located in IPL power plants. IPL has been
named as a "premises defendant" in that IPL did not mine, manufacture,
distribute or install asbestos or asbestos containing products. These suits
have been brought on behalf of persons who worked for contractors or
subcontractors hired by IPL. Many of the primary defendants-the asbestos
manufacturers-have filed for bankruptcy protection, and it is expected that
many of the remaining manufacturers will also be forced into bankruptcy. IPL
has insurance coverage for many of these claims; currently, these cases are
being defended by counsel retained by various insurers who wrote "occurrence"
coverage policies applicable to the period of time during which much of
39
the exposure has been alleged. Although we do not believe that any of the
pending asbestos suits in which IPL is a named defendant will have a material
adverse effect on our business or operations, we are unable to predict the
number or effect any additional suits may have, or the consequences to IPL of
the bankruptcy of the asbestos manufacturers; accordingly, we cannot assure you
that the pending or any additional suits will not have a material effect on our
business or operations. Trial of one asbestos case began in March 2002, and two
are set for trial in May, 2002, one in July 2002 and one in September 2002.
In March 2002, IPALCO and certain of its former officers were sued in the
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Indiana for alleged breaches of
fiduciary duty stemming from declines in the prices of AES and IPALCO stock held
by certain of IPALCO's benefit plans. We believe that this suit is without
merit. While we cannot predict the outcome, we do not believe that the suit will
have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations
or liquidity.
In addition to the foregoing, we are a defendant in various actions
relating to various aspects of our business. While it is impossible to predict
the ultimate disposition of any litigation, we do not believe that any of these
lawsuits, either individually or in the aggregate, will have a material adverse
effect on our financial condition, results of operations or liquidity.
40
MANAGEMENT
Executive Officers and Directors
The following table sets forth information regarding our executive
officers and directors and the management team of IPL as of December 31, 2001:
Name Age Position
----- ---- --------
Adrianne M. Horne.............. 59 Director of IPALCO
Lenny M. Lee................... 43 Director, Chief Executive Officer of
IPALCO and IPL
William H. Henley.............. 51 President and Director of IPALCO and IPL
and Business Unit Leader, IPL
Mark Adams..................... 44 Vice President and Business Unit Leader,
IPL
William R. Dodds............... 47 Vice President, Secretary and Treasurer
of IPALCO and IPL and Business Unit
Leader, IPL
Dwane G. Ingalls............... 40 Vice President and Business Unit Leader,
IPL
Sue Weaver..................... 43 Director of IPALCO and IPL and Vice
President and Business Unit Leader,
IPL
Lundy Kiger.................... 47 Vice President and Business Unit Leader,
IPL
John Haarlow................... 41 Director of IPALCO, Vice President and
Business Unit Leader, IPL
Hamsa Shadaksharappa........... 35 Vice President and Business Unit Leader,
IPL
Adrianne M. Horne has served as an independent director of IPALCO since
March 2001. Ms. Horne currently serves as the Assistant to Division Head at The
Corporation Trust Company, a position she has held since 1989. She has also
served as elected assistant secretary of The Corporation Trust Company since
1987.
Lenny M. Lee was appointed Chief Executive Officer of IPALCO and IPL in
April 2001, and serves on the board of directors of both IPALCO and IPL. Mr.
Lee was appointed Vice President of AES in February 2000 and President of AES
Great Plains in January 2001. As Great Plains President, he is responsible for
AES's businesses in the U.S. Midwest, including the AES CILCO and AES IPALCO
businesses. From June 1998 until his appointment as Great Plains President, Mr.
Lee was Managing Director of AES Transpower Private LTD, Singapore. As Managing
Director of AES Transpower, Mr. Lee led the AES group responsible for all of
AES's businesses, including project development and plant operations in Korea,
Australia, New Zealand, portions of Southeast Asia (Thailand, Indonesia,
Malaysia and Vietnam), Hawaii and Southern China. Prior to serving as Managing
Director of AES Transpower, Mr. Lee was the General Manager of Central Termica
San Nicolas, a 650 MW power plant in Argentina, and spent five years doing
business development for AES from Arlington, Virginia. Mr. Lee began his career
at AES in 1988 and currently serves as an officer and/or a director of numerous
AES affiliates. Mr. Lee graduated in 1980 from Cornell University with a
Bachelor of Science Degree in Chemical Engineering.
William H. Henley was appointed Business Unit Leader, Power Supply, of IPL
in March 2001 and President of IPALCO and IPL in April 2001 and serves on the
board of directors of both IPALCO and IPL. Mr. Henley currently serves as
President and as a director of other IPALCO subsidiaries. Prior to his
appointment as President, Mr. Henley served as Manager, Pricing and Cost
Analysis of IPL from May 1998 through March 2001. From July 1988 through May
1998, Mr. Henley served as Manager, Rates and Regulations for IPL. Mr. Henley
began his career at IPL in 1972. Mr. Henley holds a Bachelor of Science in
Mechanical Engineering from Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology and a Masters
in Business Administration from Butler University. Effective March 22, 2002,
Mr. Henley is no longer serving as a Business Unit Leader of IPL.
Mark Adams was appointed Vice President and Business Unit Leader,
Petersburg Plant, of IPL in March 2001. Mr. Adams had previously been President
and Plant Manager of AES Cayuga in New York. Prior to this, Mr. Adams was Vice
President and a team leader at the AES Shady Point Facility. While at AES Shady
Point, Mr. Adams ran a surface mine that provided coal to the plant. Mr. Adams
has worked on other projects within AES
41
including the acquisition of AES Southland and AES New York. Mr. Adams'
educational background consists of degrees in Business Administration and
Accounting.
William R. Dodds was appointed Vice President and Secretary of IPL and
IPALCO in April 2001, and Treasurer of IPL and IPALCO in July 2001. Mr. Dodds
has served as a Co-Business Unit Leader, Power Delivery, for IPL since March
2001. From July 1999 through March 2001, Mr. Dodds served as Group Leader,
Metering and Billing at AES CILCO. Mr. Dodds was Treasurer of AES CILCO from
October 1990 through July 1999.
Dwane G. Ingalls was appointed Vice President and Business Unit Leader,
Harding Street Station, of IPL in March 2001. Mr. Ingalls joined AES in 1990
and has served as Vice President of several AES businesses. Mr. Ingalls has
served in leadership roles within AES domestically and internationally.
Sue Weaver was appointed Vice President and Business Unit Leader, Customer
Services, of IPL in March 2001, and serves on the board of directors of IPALCO
and IPL. Prior to March 2001, Ms. Weaver served as an AES Ambassador for the
IPALCO transition. Ms. Weaver worked at AES CILCO and has 15 years of Utility
Customer Services experience. During this time, she was elected to participate
on a Customer Service implementation team introducing advanced technology and
work force enhancements to improve overall customer satisfaction. In
preparation for Illinois energy deregulation, Ms. Weaver participated on the
team commissioned to provide functionality for CILCO's regulated and
deregulated services. Ms. Weaver has been with AES since October of 1998.
Lundy Kiger was appointed Vice President and Business Unit Leader, Eagle
Valley Plant, of IPL in March 2001. Mr. Kiger served at AES Shady Point in
Oklahoma as Director of Government and Community Relations from 1995 to 2001
and as Fuel Supply Manager from 1999 to 2001. From 1992 to 1995, he also served
as a Team Leader at Shady Point. Mr. Kiger was appointed President of Cavanal
Minerals, Inc.; Mountain Minerals, Inc.; and Coal Creek Minerals, Inc.,
subsidiaries of AES, from 1999 to 2001. Prior to joining AES, Mr. Kiger was a
school administrator.
John Haarlow was appointed Vice President and Co-Business Unit Leader,
Power Delivery, of IPL in March 2001, and serves on the board of directors of
IPALCO. Mr. Haarlow had previously been a Team Leader at AES/CILCO, Peoria,
Illinois, in the Energy Delivery Business Unit. Prior to his leadership role at
AES/CILCO, Mr. Haarlow had worked through the electrical cablesplicer
apprentice program and became a journeyman cablesplicer. Before starting at
AES/CILCO, Mr. Haarlow owned and operated an automotive service business in
Illinois. Mr. Haarlow's educational background is in the areas of economics and
accounting.
Hamsa Shadaksharappa was appointed Vice President and Business Unit
Leader, Financial Services Business Unit of IPL in November 2001. Mr.
Shadaksharappa has been employed by AES since 1994, initially working on merger
and acquisition projects and project financing assignments in India, Singapore
and Australia. Prior to joining IPL, Mr. Shadaksharappa was a co-leader in the
business development office for AES midwest activities from July 1999 until
November 2001. Mr. Shadaksharappa holds a Bachelor of Science in Electrical
Engineering from Purdue University and a Masters in Business Administration
from Harvard Business School.
Board Composition
Our board of directors is comprised of five directors, including one
independent director.
Board Committees
We currently have no board committees.
42
Director Compensation
Adrianne M. Horne is serving as a member of our board, and qualifies as an
independent director for purposes of our articles of incorporation. Ms. Horne
is employed by CT Corporation System, and we will pay an initial fee to CT
Corporation System of $1,200 per year for Ms. Horne's services on our board.
The parties will conduct a review of activity at the end of each year as a
basis of determining the rate for the following year.
Executive Compensation
The following table sets forth information concerning the compensation
paid to our Chief Executive Officer and our four other most highly compensated
executive officers during our fiscal year ended December 31, 2001.
[Enlarge/Download Table]
Summary Compensation Table
Annual Compensation Long-Term Compensation
---------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------
Awards Payouts
---------------------- -------
Other Restricted Securities
Annual Stock Underlying LTIP All Other
Compensation Awards Options/ Payouts Compensation
Name and Principal Position Year Salary Bonus (2) ($) SARs (#) (3) ($) (4) (5)
--------------------------- ---- ------ ----- ------------ ------ ----------- ------- ------------
John R. Hodowal(1).............. 1999 698,972 715,617 1,736,412 0 115,000 997,670 6,400
Former Chairman & President; 2000 700,003 735,000 2,877,888 0 500,000 604,528 6,800
Former Chairman & CEO of IPL 2001 193,847 183,750 3,072,122 0 0 3,720,405 18,405,619
Ramon L. Humke(1)............... 1999 499,269 513,617 259,104 0 0 836,846 6,400
Former Vice Chairman; former 2000 500,001 525,000 2,327,262 0 330,000 507,017 6,923
President & COO of IPL 2001 163,462 131,250 1,389,510 0 0 2,699,847 10,064,611
John R. Brehm(1)................ 1999 299,561 153,563 56,951 0 0 262,704 6,397
Former Vice President & 2000 300,002 157,500 1,824,427 0 150,000 159,174 6,800
Treasurer; former SVP Finance 2001 111,924 39,375 56,023 0 0 1,281,421 4,801,844
of IPL
Leonard M. Lee(6)............... 2001 210,000 0 0 0 238,951 0 22,150
Chief Executive Officer of
IPALCO and IPL
Sue A. Weaver(7)................ 2001 106,966 30,000 0 0 9,933 0 3,209
Vice President and Business Unit
Leader, IPL
William R. Dodds(7)............. 2001 127,116 30,000 0 0 13,204 0 3,813
Vice President, Secretary and
Treasurer of IPALCO and IPL;
Business Unit Leader, IPL
William H. Henley............... 2001 132,600 11,000 0 0 21,722 0 12,556
President and Business Unit
Leader, IPL
Dwane Ingalls(7)................ 2001 111,542 32,550 0 0 30,841 0 15,931
Vice President and Business Unit
Leader, IPL
43
-------------------
(1) Mr. Hodowal served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of IPALCO and
IPL until March 21, 2001. Messrs. Humke and Brehm are included pursuant to
Item 402(a)(3) which requires up to two additional executive officers who
departed during the last fiscal year and whose salary and bonus
compensation actually paid during 2001 would have placed them among the
four most highly compensated.
(2) Represents taxes paid by IPALCO and/or IPL on accrued interest and
contributions of principal under the Funded Supplemental Retirement Plan
(See "Pension Plans") for 1999 for Messrs. Hodowal, Humke and Brehm, and
the following amounts for 2000 and 2001:
2000 2001
-------- ----------
John R. Hodowal...................... $133,486 $3,072,122
Ramon L. Humke....................... $ 69,264 $1,389,510
John R. Brehm........................ $ 23,376 $ 56,023
Includes $14,683 and $6,683 earned in above market interest on deferred
compensation for Mr. Humke in 1999 and 2000, respectively. Includes $6,754
and $42,824 earned in above market interest on deferred compensation for
Mr. Hodowal in 1999 and 2000, respectively.
Also includes a one-time bonus paid in 2000 to the following individuals
in connection with the sale of the investment in Internet Capital Group,
Inc.:
John R. Hodowal...................... $2,701,578
Ramon L. Humke....................... $2,251,315
John R. Brehm........................ $1,801,051
(3) No options have stock appreciation rights. The figures for Messrs.
Hodowal, Humke and Brehm in 1999 and 2000 reflect the number of options
for shares of common stock of IPALCO Enterprises, Inc. The figures for the
other individuals for 2001 reflect the number of options for shares of
common stock of AES.
(4) Payouts shown were made pursuant to the Restricted Stock Plan.
(5) Includes severance payments in 2001 in connection with the acquisition of
IPALCO by AES as follows:
John R. Hodowal...................... $18,398,819
Ramon L. Humke....................... $10,059,881
John R. Brehm........................ $ 4,798,521
Remaining amounts for Messrs. Hodowal, Humke and Brehm represent
contributions made by IPL to the Trustee of the Employees' Thrift Plan.
Represents contributions to The AES Corporation's Profit-Sharing and Stock
Ownership Plan, the Employee Stock ownership Plan of AES, respectively, as
follows:
Mr. Lee, $11,050 and $8,500; Mr. Henley, $4,056 and $8,500 (includes
contributions to both the Employee Stock Ownership Plan of AES and the IPL
Employee Thrift Plan); Mr. Ingalls $7,431, and $8,500.
Amounts shown for Ms. Weaver and Mr. Dodds reflect employer contributions
to the CILCO Employees' Savings Plan. For Mr. Lee this amount also
reflects an allocation of $2,600 to the AES Supplemental Retirement Plan.
(6) Leonard M. Lee serves AES and its affiliates, including IPALCO and IPL, in
several different capacities and is compensated directly by AES. Mr. Lee
was appointed Chief Executive Officer of IPALCO and IPL on March 27, 2001.
Mr. Lee received additional compensation in connection with his service
overseas with AES and such compensation is not reported in this table.
(7) Messrs. Dodds and Ingalls and Ms. Weaver were employed by affiliates of
AES other than IPALCO and/or IPL prior to March 27, 2001, when they were
each appointed to their current positions with IPL. These individuals
received bonuses from AES in early 2001 that were not related to their
employment with IPL and are not included in this summary compensation
table. Bonus amounts include bonuses earned in 2001 but received in early
2002. Salary figures for these individuals reflect all salary paid to
these individuals by IPL and other AES affiliates in calendar year 2001.
44
Employment Agreements
We have not entered into any employment agreements with any of our
executive officers.
Stock Option and Benefit Plans
All members of our management participate in employee benefit plans and
arrangements sponsored by AES, including The AES Corporation Incentive Stock
Option Plan, The AES Corporation 2001 Stock Option Plan, The AES Corporation
Profit Sharing and Stock Ownership Plan, The AES Corporation Employee Stock
Ownership Plan and health and life insurance plans. Mr. Lee participates in an
AES supplemental retirement plan as an AES officer.
Stock Option/SAR Grants in Last Fiscal Year
The following table sets forth information concerning grants of stock
options and stock appreciation rights ("SARs") made to the executive officers
named in the Summary Compensation Table during our fiscal year ended December
31, 2001. This table does not include option grants in early 2001 that
represent compensation for calendar year 2000.
[Enlarge/Download Table]
Option/SAR Grants in Last Fiscal Year (2001)
Potential Realizable Value at
Assumed Annual Rates of Stock
Price Appreciation for Option
Individual Grant Term
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -----------------------------
Number of Percent of Total
Securities Options/SARs
Underlying Granted to Exercise or
Options/SARs Employees in Base Price (2) Expiration 5% 10%
Name Granted (#) (1) Fiscal Year ($/Sh) Date ($) (3) ($) (3)
---- --------------- ----------- ------ ---- ------- -------
John R. Hodowal............. 0 0% $ 0 $ 0 $ 0
Ramon L. Humke.............. 0 0% $ 0 $ 0 $ 0
John R. Brehm............... 0 0% $ 0 $ 0 $ 0
Leonard M. Lee.............. 238,951 1.17% $13.19 10/25/2011 1,985,683 5,010,802
-------
Sue A. Weaver............... 1,537 $49.60 3/27/2011 48,031 121,208
8,396 $13.19 10/25/2011 69,768 176,082
-------
9,933 0.05%
William R. Dodds............ 1,537 $49.60 3/27/2011 48,031 121,208
11,667 $13.19 10/25/2011 96,953 244,657
-------
13,204 0.06%
William H. Henley........... 3,075 $49.60 3/27/2011 96,094 242,495
18,647 $13.19 10/25/2011 154,957 391,028
-------
21,722 0.11%
Dwane Ingalls............... 1,537 $49.60 3/27/2011 48,031 121,208
29,304 $13.19 10/25/2011 243,516 614,505
-------
30,841 0.15%
45
(1) The options with an expiration date of 1/31/2011 and 3/27/2011 were
granted on 1/31/2001 and 3/27/2001, respectively. One-half of these
options are exercisable on the first anniversary of the date of grant, and
the remaining one-half are exercisable on the second anniversary of the
date of grant. The options with an expiration date of 10/25/2011 were
granted on 10/25/2001 and are exercisable in full on 10/25/2002. None of
the stock options contain stock appreciation rights.
(2) Equal to market price on grant date.
(3) The values shown in these columns are merely assumed values required by,
and calculated in accordance with, Securities and Exchange Commission
Rules.
Aggregated Option and SAR Exercises in Last Fiscal Year and Fiscal Year End
Option Values
The following table sets forth information concerning option and SAR exercises
by the executive officers named in the Summary Compensation Table during our
fiscal year ended December 31, 2001.
[Enlarge/Download Table]
Aggregated Option/SAR Exercises in Last Fiscal Year (2001)
and Fiscal Year End Option/SAR Values
Number of Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options/SARs At Value of Unexercised
Shares Fiscal Year In-the-Money
Acquired on End (#) Options/SARs At
Exercise Value Realized Exercisable/ Fiscal Year End ($)*
Name (#) ($) Unexercisable Exercisable/Unexercisable
---- ----------- -------------- ------------------- -------------------------
-0-(e) -0-
John R. Hodowal........................... -0- -0- -0-(u) -0-
152,790(e) -0-
Ramon L. Humke............................ -0- -0- -0-(u) -0-
-0-(e) -0-
John R. Brehm............................. -0- -0- -0-(u) -0-
135,396(e) 867,130(e)
Leonard M. Lee............................ 80,340 4,197,216 284,200(u) 755,085(u)
-0- -0-(e)
Sue A. Weaver............................. -0- -0- 10,019(u) 26,531(u)
227(e) -0-(e)
William R. Dodds.......................... -0- -0- 14,022(u) 36,868(u)
6,945(e) -0-(e)
William H. Henley......................... -0- -0- 21,722(u) 58,925(u)
3,649(e) 8,723(e)
Dwane Ingalls............................. -0- -0- 32,176(u) 92,601(u)
-------------------
(e) Exercisable.
(u) Unexercisable.
* Based upon year-end closing market price of $16.35 per share of common stock.
46
Pension Plans
The following table below illustrates the combined annual retirement
benefits computed on a straight-life annuity basis that are payable under the
Base Retirement Plan and the Funded Supplemental Retirement Plan (assuming
continuous employment to age 65) to former executive officers, including
Messrs. Hodowal, Humke and Brehm, having the remuneration and years of service
shown.
Pension Plan Table (1)
Years of Service
---------------------------------------------------
Remuneration 15 20 25 30 35
------------ -------- -------- -------- -------- --------
$125,000 $ 75,000 $ 75,000 $ 75,000 $ 75,000 $ 75,000
150,000 90,000 90,000 90,000 90,000 90,000
175,000 105,000 105,000 105,000 105,000 105,000
200,000 120,000 120,000 120,000 120,000 120,000
225,000 135,000 135,000 135,000 135,000 135,000
250,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000
300,000 180,000 180,000 180,000 180,000 180,000
400,000 240,000 240,000 240,000 240,000 240,000
450,000 270,000 270,000 270,000 270,000 270,000
500,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000
600,000 360,000 360,000 360,000 360,000 360,000
700,000 420,000 420,000 420,000 420,000 420,000
-------------------
(1) This table takes into account the latest Internal Revenue Code Section 415
benefit limitations and Internal Revenue Code Section 401(a)(17)
compensation limitation applicable to the Base Retirement Plan. Benefits
for both the Base Retirement Plan portion and Funded Supplemental
Retirement Plan portion of the combined amounts have been shown without
adjustment for income taxes.
IPL's Employees' Retirement Plan covers all permanent employees with one
year of service but excludes directors unless they are also officers. It
provides fixed benefits at normal retirement age based upon compensation and
length of service, the costs of which are computed actuarially. The
remuneration covered by the plan includes "Salary" but excludes "Bonus" and
"Other Compensation," annual or otherwise, as those terms are used in the
Summary Compensation Table. Benefits are calculated on the basis of the highest
average annual salary in any 60 consecutive months of employment. Mr. Henley is
the only other named executive officer covered by the Base Retirement Plan.
Pension benefits stopped accruing on July 8, 2001 for virtually all
non-union employees.
The Funded Supplemental Retirement Plan referred to above was applicable
to all former senior officers, including Messrs. Hodowal, Humke and Brehm, and,
at reduced benefits, to all other former officers of IPALCO and IPL. In
addition to the Base Retirement Plan and Funded Supplemental Retirement Plan
benefits described above, the Funded Supplemental Retirement Plan also provides
Mr. Hodowal with a straight-life annuity of $130,000 per year commencing at age
65, which benefit is reduced in accordance with the other applicable provisions
set forth in the plan for early retirement. Contributions and accrued interest
credit during 2001 to the accounts of Messrs. Hodowal, Humke, and Brehm
amounted to $3,823,776, $1,729,480 and $61,655, respectively (in additions to
the federal, state and local income tax payments reflected in the table above).
Contributions are based on actuarial assessments of benefits projected to
accrue to such officers under the Funded Supplemental Retirement Plan upon
termination of employment at normal retirement age and at current salary
levels. No current employees are covered by the Funded Supplemental Retirement
Plan, all benefits are vested and no additional benefits are accruing under
this plan.
47
OWNERSHIP
All of our common stock is owned by our parent company, The AES
Corporation. As the wholly-owned subsidiary of AES, we are controlled by AES
and AES's interests may differ from the interests of the holders of the notes.
RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
The following summary describes the transactions among IPALCO and its
owners and affiliates.
Our Articles of Incorporation
As a direct result of discussions with rating agencies, in order for us to
receive credit ratings that are higher than the credit ratings of our parent,
The AES Corporation, we amended our articles of incorporation during the fourth
quarter of 2001. The following discussion summarizes certain provisions of our
articles of incorporation, to which reference is made for the detailed
provisions thereof.
Under our articles of incorporation, our board is to consist of between
three and 12 members, one of whom must qualify as an independent director. In
general, an independent director is someone who has not had any of an
enumerated list of relationships with AES or its affiliates within the last
five years. The unanimous consent of the board, including the independent
director, is required to take certain actions relating to creditor rights and
bankruptcy laws. All of our directors, including the independent director, have
a fiduciary duty to us, including, at any time when we are insolvent, our
creditors, and must make decisions with respect to our business and operations
independent of AES and its other affiliates.
Our articles of incorporation also contain provisions with regard to our
funds, accounts, liabilities, capitalization and indebtedness. Among other
things, we must:
o Ensure that our capitalization is adequate in light of our
business and purpose and maintain an arm's length relationship
with AES and its other affiliates;
o Pay our own liabilities out of our own funds and, except in the
case of our subsidiaries, cannot become liable for the debts of
AES and its affiliates, or make loans or advances to those
entities or acquire their securities; and
o Conduct our business in our own name, maintain our separate
identity and keep our own funds, accounts, assets, records and
books of account.
The unanimous consent of the board, including the independent director, is
required to amend any of the provisions in the articles relating to the
foregoing.
Certain activities are also limited, and we have agreed not to engage in
the following activities, subject to important exceptions and qualifications:
o Expand our business activities beyond our permitted business
activities;
o Incur any indebtedness other than in connection with our
permitted business activities, existing indebtedness or
indebtedness incurred to refinance outstanding indebtedness or
to make distributions or intercompany loans to our affiliates
that comply with the limitations on such distributions and
loans, as described below, or other indebtedness incurred
subsequent to receipt of written confirmation from the rating
agencies that such incurrence would not result in a ratings
downgrade (as defined in our articles of incorporation); or
48
o Consolidate with or merge with or into any other person, or
convey, transfer or lease our consolidated properties and assets
substantially as an entirety.
However, the limitation on indebtedness shall cease to be in effect if the
rating agencies confirm that our senior long-term debt rating would still be
rated at least investment grade without such restrictions.
Our articles of incorporation also contain limitations on distributions
and intercompany loans. We may not make a distribution to AES or make a loan to
AES or any of its affiliates unless at such time and as a result of such
distribution or intercompany loan (a) our (i) leverage ratio (as defined in our
articles of incorporation, which definition is substantially the same as such
definition in the indenture governing the notes) does not exceed 0.67 to 1 and
(ii) interest coverage ratio (as defined in our articles of incorporation,
which definition is substantially the same as such definition in the indenture
governing the notes) is at least 2.5:1; or (b) if we are not in compliance with
the foregoing ratios, at such time our senior long-term debt rating from the
rating agencies is at least investment grade, and, provided further, that such
limitation shall cease to be in effect if the rating agencies confirm that our
senior long-term debt rating would still be rated at least investment grade
without such restrictions.
Using the defined terms set forth above, the following table shows
comparative ratios for us covering the years ending December 31, 2000 and
December 31, 2001.
Interest
Leverage Ratio Coverage
(1) Ratio(2)
-------------- --------
Year ended December 31, 2000.......................... 21.5% 7.13
Year ended December 31, 2001.......................... 96.24% 7.99
Year ended December 31, 2001 (as adjusted) (3)(4)..... 47.06% 4.44
-------------------
(1) Consolidated debt (as defined in our articles of incorporation, which
definition is substantially the same as such definition in the indenture
governing the notes) divided by total capital (as defined in our articles
of incorporation, which definition is substantially the same as such
definition in the indenture governing the notes).
(2) Consolidated EBITDA (as defined in our articles of incorporation, which
definition is substantially the same as such definition in the indenture
governing the notes) for the prior four fiscal quarters divided by
consolidated interest expenses (as defined in our articles of
incorporation, which definition is substantially the same as such
definition in the indenture governing the notes).
(3) Leverage ratio as adjusted to reflect Adjusted Total Capital (as defined
in our articles of incorporation, which definition is substantially the
same as such definition in the indenture governing the notes).
(4) Interest coverage ratio as adjusted to reflect the sale by us of the old
notes assuming that the old notes were outstanding for the entire year
ended December 31, 2001.
We are also limited, subject to important exceptions and qualifications,
in our ability to create certain liens on our assets or properties, including
the capital stock of certain of our subsidiaries (excluding IPL).
Tax Sharing Agreement
We expect to enter into a tax sharing agreement with AES that governs the
preparation, filing and payment of federal, state and local taxes. Under the
agreement, with respect to returns that are filed on a consolidated, combined
or unitary basis, we and each of our subsidiaries that are members of the
relevant group will generally be liable to AES for our share of the taxes due
with respect to such returns based on such member's share of such taxes,
determined as if we were a separate consolidated group. In the case of IPL,
IPL's share of such taxes payable to AES shall be determined as if IPL filed a
separate tax return. AES is not required to pay us for the use of any our
losses or credits that reduce the taxes of other members of the relevant group.
Further, under this separate return approach, we may be required to make
payments to AES for a tax year even if the AES consolidated group has no
overall tax liability for that year. The agreement also provides that AES will
generally control the preparation and
49
filing of tax returns for years in which we are a member of its consolidated
group and the contest of tax audits and controversies.
Employee Sharing Arrangements
Certain of our employees, including members of our current management
team, also provide services to other affiliates of AES. Some of these employees
are compensated directly by AES and its affiliates for those services.
Combustion Turbine Acquisition
IPL has purchased at fair market value from IPALCO a simple cycle gas
turbine generator for installation at its Harding Street Station. The turbine
is a General Electric Model PG7241 with nameplate, and approximate summer and
winter generating capability of 171.1 MW, 151 MW, and 185 MW, respectively. The
purchase price was approximately $42.6 million and the costs of acquisition and
installation are expected to total approximately $61 million. The combustion
turbine is expected to be in service during the second quarter of 2002.
DESCRIPTION OF OTHER INDEBTEDNESS
The following is a summary of our other material indebtedness. It may not
contain all of the information about this indebtedness that is important to
you. You should therefore read the debt instruments, copies of which are
available as described under "Where You Can Find More Information." This
summary is qualified in its entirety by reference to those debt instruments.
Revolving Credit Facility
All borrowings under the terms of the revolving credit facility dated
April 1997, were paid in full and the facility was terminated on November 14,
2001, in conjunction with the issuance of the old notes.
Commercial Paper Program
In December 2001, we terminated our 4(2) special purpose commercial paper
facility.
Indebtedness of our Subsidiaries
The following is a summary of the material terms of certain indebtedness
of our subsidiaries. Holders of our notes will not have any claim as a creditor
against any of our subsidiaries, and indebtedness and other liabilities,
including trade payables, of those subsidiaries will effectively be senior to
claims of the holders of the notes against those subsidiaries. In addition,
holders of our notes will be effectively junior to the holders of preferred
stock of our subsidiaries. As of December 31, 2001, our direct and indirect
subsidiaries had total long-term debt, current liabilities and preferred stock
of approximately $797 million, all of which is effectively senior to the notes.
In addition, the indenture governing the notes will not restrict these
subsidiaries from incurring additional indebtedness and will not contain any
limitation on the amount of other liabilities, such as trade payables, that may
be incurred by these subsidiaries.
Cumulative Preferred Stock
IPL has issued five separate series of its cumulative preferred stock.
Holders of the preferred stock are entitled to receive dividends at rates per
annum ranging from 4.0% through 5.65%. During the twelve months ended December
31, 2001, 2000 and 1999, preferred stock dividends were $3.2 million, $3.2
million and $3.2 million, respectively. The aggregate principal amount of
preferred stock outstanding as of December 31, 2001 was approximately $59.1
million. Holders of the preferred stock are entitled to two votes per share for
IPL matters, and if four full quarterly dividends are in default on all shares
of the preferred stock then outstanding, they are entitled to elect the
smallest number of IPL directors to constitute a majority of IPL's board of
directors. The preferred stock is
50
redeemable solely at the option of IPL and can be redeemed in whole or in part
at any time at specific call prices. See Note 6 in the Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements.
Lines of Credit
At December 31, 2001, IPL had unused, committed lines of credit with banks
of $55.0 million used to provide loans for interim financing which require the
payment of certain fees. These lines of credit, based on separate agreements,
have expiration dates ranging from January 2002 to October 2002. The weighted
average interest rate on notes payable and commercial paper outstanding was not
applicable at December 31, 2001, since the principal outstanding was zero, and
was not applicable at December 31, 2000. See Note 9 in the Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements. On January 31, 2002, $25 million of the $55
million total lines of credit expired and was not renewed. IPL is negotiating
an additional line of credit which should be in place during the second
quarter.
Commercial Paper
IPL has a $100 million 3(a)3 commercial paper program which is backed up
by its lines of credit. There was no balance at December 31, 2001.
Long-Term Debt
IPL uses long-term debt as a primary source of capital in its business.
Historically, a portion of this debt had an interest rate component that reset
on a periodic basis to reflect market conditions. On December 31, 2000, IPL had
a total of $173.5 million in variable-rate debt outstanding at a simple-average
rate of 4.90% (weighted-average of 4.86%). For reasons discussed immediately
following, IPL reset five of the six variable-rate instruments to fixed- rate
mode on August 1, 2001. This action left one $40 million issue (Series 1995B)
outstanding in variable-rate mode as of December 31, 2001, at a year-end rate
of 1.6% (as compared to 5.0% at year-end on December 31, 2000). This Series
1995B issue is synthetically fixed at a rate of 5.21%. The interest rate swap
agreement is discussed below.
Through 2000, IPL's six variable-rate issues averaged 4.27%, which rates
were based upon the credit rating in effect for IPL at that time. However, the
credit rating agencies downgraded IPL after the acquisition was completed on
March 27, 2001, resulting in a corresponding interest rate increase on IPL's
variable-rate, unsecured series. For the five issues subsequently reset, the
simple-average rate IPL incurred from January 1, 2001, through March 27, 2001,
was 3.47%. After the acquisition was complete, the rate increased through
August 1, 2001, to 4.38%, an increase of nearly 1%. Given the historically-low
rates then in effect, and based upon consultations with the remarketing
agents(s) for the affected five series, IPL determined that a fixed-rate debt
position would be optimal for five of its six variable-rate instruments.
Accordingly, effective August 1, 2001, IPL reset these five issues totaling
$127.4 million to a semi-annual, fixed-rate mode. The coupon rates range from
5.75% to 6.375%. The maturities range from August 2021 to August 2030. See
"Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations--Market Risk Disclosure."
The weighted average rate of IPL's fixed-rate debt at the end of 2001 was
6.56%, carrying a principal value of $582.7 million and a fair-value of $587.2
million. IPL's $40.0 million variable-rate debt carried a year-end rate of 1.6%
and a fair market value of $40.0 million.
IPL has entered into an interest rate swap. Under this swap, IPL agrees
with a swap counterparty to exchange, at specified intervals, the difference
between fixed-rate and floating-rate interest amounts calculated on an agreed
notional amount. This interest differential paid or received is recognized in
the consolidated statements of income as a component of interest expense.
At December 31, 2001, IPL's interest rate swap agreement had a notional
amount of $40.0 million, and it expires in January 2023. Under the agreement,
IPL pays interest at a fixed rate of 5.21% to a swap counter party and receives
a variable rate based on the tax-exempt weekly rate. The fair value of IPL's
swap agreement was $(3.7) million at December 31, 2001.
51
IPL used a portion of the proceeds received from the sale of its thermal
assets (see Note 8 in the notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements) to
retire $6.2 of its million of its 1999 series in January 2001. IPL had no other
debt maturing in 2001, nor does it have long-term debt maturing in 2002. Of our
long-term debt, $80 million will mature in 2004.
52
DESCRIPTION OF THE NOTES
In this Description of Notes, "IPALCO" refers only to IPALCO Enterprises,
Inc., and any successor obligor on the notes, and not to any of its
subsidiaries. You can find the definitions of certain terms used in this
description under "--Certain Definitions."
IPALCO issued the old notes under an indenture between IPALCO and Bank
One, National Association, as trustee. The terms of the new notes are identical
in all material respects to the terms of the old notes, except for transfer
restrictions relating to the outstanding notes, and, in both cases, include
those stated in the indenture and those made part of the indenture by reference
to the Trust Indenture Act of 1939. When we refer to the term "notes" in this
"Description of the Notes" section, we are referring to both the old notes and
the new notes to be issued in the exchange offer.
The following is a summary of the material provisions of the indenture.
Because this is a summary, it may not contain all the information that is
important to you. You should read the indenture in its entirety. Copies of the
proposed form of the indenture are available as described under "Available
Information."
Basic Terms of Notes
The notes
o are senior obligations of IPALCO;
o rank equally with all other existing and future senior
obligations of IPALCO;
o are senior to all existing and future subordinated Indebtedness
of IPALCO;
o rank junior to all Indebtedness and other liabilities of IPL and
IPALCO's other subsidiaries;
The notes due 2008:
o are issued in an original aggregate principal amount of
$375,000,000;
o mature on November 14, 2008; and
o bear interest commencing the date of issue at 7.375%, payable
semi-annually on each November 15 and May 15 (and at maturity),
commencing May 15, 2002, to holders of record on the November 1
or May 1 immediately preceding the interest payment date.
The notes due 2011:
o are issued in an original aggregate principal amount of
$375,000,000;
o mature on November 14, 2011; and
o bear interest commencing the date of issue at 7.625%, payable
semi-annually on each November 15 and May 15 (and at maturity),
commencing May 15, 2002, to holders of record on the November 1
or May 1 immediately preceding the interest payment date.
Interest will be computed on the basis of a 360-day year of twelve 30-day
months.
The indenture contains certain restrictions on the ability of IPALCO to
incur additional indebtedness. The indenture contains no restrictions on the
amount of additional indebtedness, including secured indebtedness, which may be
incurred by IPALCO's subsidiaries.
53
Because IPALCO is a holding company, its rights and the rights of its
creditors, including holders of the notes, in respect of claims on the assets
of each of IPALCO's subsidiaries upon any liquidation or administration are
structurally subordinated to, and therefore will be subject to the prior claims
of, each such subsidiary's preferred stockholders and creditors (including
trade creditors of and holders of debt issued by such subsidiary). At June 30,
2001, IPALCO's direct and indirect subsidiaries had total long-term debt,
current liabilities and preferred stock of approximately $788 million, all of
which would be effectively senior to the notes.
The ability of IPALCO to pay interest on the notes is dependent upon the
receipt by it of dividends and other distributions from direct and indirect
subsidiaries, including IPL in particular. The availability of distributions
from IPALCO's subsidiaries is subject to the satisfaction of various covenants
and conditions contained in the applicable subsidiaries' existing and future
financing documents.
Interest Rate Adjustment
At any time on or after the date of this prospectus, the annual interest
rate payable on the notes will be subject to adjustment from time to time if
either Moody's or S&P, or both, downgrades the rating ascribed to the notes as
set forth below.
(a) If the rating from Moody's is decreased below Baa3, the annual
interest rate for each series of notes will increase by .50%.
(b) In addition, if the rating from S&P is decreased below BBB-, then the
annual interest rate for each series of notes will increase by 0.50%.
Each adjustment required by any decrease in rating above, whether
occasioned by the action of Moody's or S&P, or both, shall be made independent
of any and all other adjustments. If Moody's or S&P subsequently increases its
rating of the notes to any of the thresholds set forth under clause (a) or (b)
above or higher, the annual interest rate on each series of notes will be
readjusted downwards by the percentage set forth in such clause. If the annual
interest rate on the notes is increased as a result of clauses (a) and (b)
above, the total increase in the annual interest rate for each series of notes
pursuant to these interest rate adjustment provisions shall not exceed 1.00%.
In no event shall (i) the interest rate for any series of notes be reduced to
below the annual interest rate set forth for such series on the cover page of
this prospectus. The old notes also provided for an additional increase in the
annual interest rate if S&P lowered the rating of the notes below BBB- during
the first 90 days following the date the old notes were originally issued. S&P
did not decrease the rating of the notes below BBB- during such period.
Any interest rate increase or decrease, as described herein, will take
effect from the first day of the first interest period following the interest
period during which a ratings change requires an adjustment in the interest
rate.
Collateral
The notes will be secured through a pledge by IPALCO of all the
outstanding common stock of IPL and any proceeds thereof (the "Pledged Stock").
IPALCO may secure other Indebtedness of IPALCO equally and ratably with the
notes, subject to compliance with the limitations on the incurrence of
Indebtedness described below under the caption "--Limitation on Indebtedness."
IPALCO will be able to vote, as it sees fit in its sole discretion, the
pledged shares of common stock, unless an Event of Default has occurred and is
continuing.
If IPALCO meets the conditions to its defeasance option or its covenant
defeasance option with respect to any series of the notes, as described below
under the caption "--Defeasance and Discharge," or the indenture is otherwise
discharged, the Lien on the pledged shares will terminate with respect to such
series of the notes.
If an Event of Default occurs and is continuing under the indenture, the
collateral agent, on behalf of the holders of the notes and the holders of
other permitted IPALCO senior secured Indebtedness, in addition to any
54
rights or remedies available to it under the pledge agreement, may take such
action as it deems advisable to protect and enforce its right in the
collateral, including the institution of foreclosure proceedings. Such
foreclosure proceedings, the enforcement of the pledge agreement and the right
to take other actions with respect to the pledged shares of IPL stock will be
controlled by holders of a majority of the aggregate principal amount of the
then outstanding obligations which are equally and ratably secured by the
pledge of the IPL stock. The proceeds received by the collateral agent from any
foreclosure will be applied by the collateral agent, first, to pay the expenses
of such foreclosure and fees and other amounts then payable to the collateral
agent under the pledge agreement and, thereafter, to pay the notes and the
other permitted IPALCO senior secured Indebtedness on a pro rata basis based on
the aggregate amount outstanding of the notes and the other permitted IPALCO
senior secured Indebtedness. There can be no assurance that any proceeds from
the foreclosure of the Pledged Stock will be sufficient to satisfy the amounts
due under the notes.
Regulatory considerations may affect the ability of the collateral agent
to exercise certain rights with respect to the Pledged Stock upon the
occurrence of an Event of Default. Because IPL is a regulated public utility,
such foreclosure proceedings, the enforcement of the pledge agreement and the
right to take other actions with respect to the pledged shares of IPL stock may
be limited and subject to regulatory approval. IPL is subject to regulation at
the state level by the IURC. At the federal level, it is subject to regulation
by FERC. See "Business--Indianapolis Power & Light Company--Regulation" and
"Business--Regulatory Matters." Regulation by the IURC and FERC includes
regulation with respect to the change of control, transfer or ownership of
utility property. In particular, such foreclosure proceedings, the enforcement
of the pledge agreement and the right to take other actions with respect to the
pledged shares of IPL stock would require (1) FERC approval to the extent such
actions resulted in a change in control or a transfer of the ownership of the
pledged shares of IPL common stock and (2) IURC approval to the extent such
actions resulted in a transfer of the ownership of the pledged shares of IPL
stock to another Indiana utility. There can be no assurance that any such
regulatory approval can be obtained on a timely basis, or at all.
The notes are not secured by any lien on, or other security interest in,
any other properties or assets of IPALCO or its subsidiaries. The security
interest in the Pledged Stock will not alter the effective subordination of the
notes to the creditors of IPALCO's subsidiaries.
Optional Redemption
General
The notes of each series will be redeemable in whole or in part, at the
option of IPALCO at any time, at a redemption price equal to the greater of:
(1) 100% of the principal amount of the series of notes being
redeemed; or
(2) the sum of the present values of the remaining scheduled
payments of principal of and interest on the series of notes
being redeemed discounted to the date of redemption on a
semiannual basis (assuming a 360-day year consisting of twelve
30-day months) at a discount rate equal to the Treasury Yield
plus 50 basis points;
plus, for (1) or (2) above, whichever is applicable, accrued interest on such
notes to the date of redemption.
Notice of redemption must be given not less than 30 days nor more than 60
days prior to the date of redemption. If fewer than all the notes are to be
redeemed, selection of notes of a series for redemption will be made by the
trustee in any manner the trustee deems fair and appropriate.
Unless IPALCO defaults in payment of the redemption price from and after
the redemption date, the notes or portions of them called for redemption will
cease to bear interest, and the holders of the notes will have no right in
respect to such notes except the right to receive the redemption price for
them.
55
Discussion of Optional Redemption Provisions
Under the procedures set forth above, the redemption price payable upon
the optional redemption at any time of a security is determined by calculating
the present value at that time of each remaining payment of principal of or
interest on the security and then totaling those present values. If the sum of
those present values is equal to or less than 100% of the principal amount of
the security, the redemption price of the security will be 100% of its
principal amount (redemption at par). If the sum of the present values is
greater than 100% of the principal amount of the security, the redemption price
of the security will be that greater amount (redemption at a premium). In no
event may a security be redeemed optionally at less than 100% of its principal
amount.
The present value at any time of a payment of principal of or interest on
a security is calculated by applying to the payment the discount rate
applicable to the security. The discount rate applicable at any time to payment
of principal of or interest on a security equals the equivalent yield to
maturity at that time of a fixed rate United States treasury security having a
maturity comparable to the maturity of the security plus 50 basis points, such
yield being calculated on the basis of the interest rate borne by that United
States treasury security and the price at that time of that treasury security.
While the coupon borne by a United States treasury security is fixed, the price
of that treasury security tends to vary with interest rate levels prevailing
from time to time. In general, if at a particular time the prevailing level of
interest rates is higher than the level of interest rates prevailing at the
time the relevant United States treasury security was issued, the price of that
treasury security will be lower than its issue price. Conversely, if at a
particular time the prevailing level of interest rates is lower than the level
of interest rates prevailing at the time the relevant United States treasury
security was issued, the price of that treasury security will be higher than
its issue price.
As a result, an increase or a decrease in the then prevailing level of
interest rates above or below the level of interest rates prevailing at the
time of issue of a United States treasury security will generally result in an
increase or a decrease, respectively, in the yield to maturity of that security
and, therefore, in the discount rate used to determine the present value of a
payment of principal of or interest on a security. An increase or a decrease in
the discount rate will result in a decrease or an increase, respectively, of
the present value of a payment of principal of or interest on a security. In
other words, the redemption price varies inversely with the prevailing levels
of interest rates. As noted above, however, if the sum of the present values of
the remaining payments of principal of and interest on a security proposed to
be redeemed is less than its principal amount, that security may only be
redeemed at par.
The United States treasury security employed in the calculation of a
discount rate as well as the price and equivalent yield to maturity of that
treasury security will be selected or determined by an independent investment
banking institution of international standing appointed by IPALCO.
No Mandatory Redemption or Sinking Fund
There will be no mandatory redemption or sinking fund payments for the
notes.
Ranking
Structural Subordination. Substantially all the operations of IPALCO are
conducted through its subsidiaries. Claims of creditors of subsidiaries,
including trade creditors, secured creditors and creditors holding debt and
guarantees issued by those subsidiaries, and claims of preferred and minority
stockholders (if any) of those subsidiaries generally will have priority with
respect to the assets and earnings of those subsidiaries over the claims of
creditors of IPALCO, including holders of the notes. The notes therefore will
be effectively subordinated to creditors (including trade creditors) and
preferred and minority stockholders (if any) of subsidiaries of IPALCO. As of
December 31, 2001, IPALCO's direct and indirect subsidiaries had total
long-term debt, current liabilities and preferred stock of approximately $797
million, all of which would be effectively senior to the notes. Moreover, the
indenture does not impose any limitation on the incurrence by subsidiaries of
additional liabilities or the issuance of additional preferred stock or
minority interests.
56
Morever, as a holding company, we do not directly own any assets, other
than our ownership interests in our subsidiaries. None of our subsidiaries is
obligated under the notes and none of our subsidiaries will guarantee the
notes. Our principal asset is our ownership interest in IPL. IPL is a regulated
public utility, and is subject to regulation at both the state and federal
level. At the state level, it is subject to regulation by the IURC. At the
federal level, it is subject to regulation by FERC. See "Business--Indianapolis
Power & Light Company--Regulation" and "Business--Regulatory Matters."
Regulation by the IURC and FERC includes regulation with respect to the change
of control, transfer or ownership of utility property. Accordingly, if the
trustee under the indenture or the holders of the notes institute proceedings
against us with respect to the notes, the remedies available to them may be
limited and may be subject to the approval by the IURC and FERC.
Covenants
Except as otherwise set forth under "--Defeasance and Discharge" below,
for so long as any notes remain outstanding or any amount remains unpaid on any
of the notes, IPALCO will comply with the terms of the covenants set forth
below.
Payment of Principal and Interest
IPALCO will duly and punctually pay the principal of and interest on the
notes in accordance with the terms of the notes and the indenture.
Limitations on Consolidation, Merger, Conveyance, Sale or Lease
IPALCO may not (i)(a) consolidate with or merge with or into any other
Person, or permit any Person to merge into or consolidate with IPALCO, or
convey, transfer or lease its consolidated properties and assets substantially
as an entirety (in one transaction or in a series of related transactions), (b)
convey, transfer or lease its consolidated electric transmission and
distribution assets and operations substantially as an entirety (in one
transaction or in a series of related transactions), or (c) convey, transfer or
lease all or substantially all of its consolidated electric generation assets
and operations (in one transaction or a series of transactions), to any Person
or (ii) permit any of its subsidiaries to enter into any such transaction or
series of transactions if it would result in the disposition of (x) IPALCO's
consolidated properties and assets substantially as an entirety, (y) IPALCO's
consolidated electric transmission and distribution assets and operations
substantially as an entirety or (z) all or substantially all of IPALCO's
consolidated electric generation assets and operations unless, in each case:
o either (1) IPALCO will be the surviving entity, or (2) the
surviving entity, if other than IPALCO, formed by such
consolidation or into which IPALCO is merged or that acquired or
leased such property or assets (the "Surviving Person") will be
an entity organized under the laws of the United States of
America, one of its States or the District of Columbia and
expressly assumes by supplemental indenture IPALCO's obligations
under the notes and the indenture, provided, however, that in
the event following a conveyance, transfer or lease of IPALCO's
consolidated properties and assets substantially as an entirety
or a conveyance, transfer or lease of all or substantially all
of IPALCO's consolidated electric generation assets and
operations, IPALCO continues to own, directly or indirectly, its
consolidated electric transmission and distribution assets and
operations that it held immediately preceding such conveyance,
transfer or lease substantially as an entirety, the notes and
the indenture shall remain the obligations of IPALCO and shall
not be assumed by the Surviving Person; and
o immediately after giving effect to that transaction, (1) no
Event of Default shall have occurred and be continuing and (2)
either (a) IPALCO obtains written confirmation from the Rating
Agencies that its senior long term debt rating is at least BBB-
(or its then equivalent) with S&P and Baa3 (or its then
equivalent) with Moody's or (b) IPALCO or the Surviving Person,
as the case may be, not later than 30 days following the
consummation of such consolidation, merger, conveyance, transfer
or lease, makes an Offer to Purchase all outstanding notes at a
purchase price equal to 100% of the principal
57
amount plus accrued interest to the date of purchase and
thereafter consummates the purchase of all notes validly
tendered in such Offer to Purchase.
An "Offer to Purchase" must be made by written offer, which will specify
the principal amount of notes subject to the offer and the purchase price. The
offer must specify an expiration date (the "expiration date") not less than 30
days or more than 60 days after the date of the offer and a settlement date for
purchase (the "purchase date") not more than five Business Days after the
expiration date. The offer must include information concerning the business of
IPALCO and its Subsidiaries or the Surviving Person and its subsidiaries, as
the case may be, which IPALCO or the Surviving Person in good faith believes
will enable the holders to make an informed decision with respect to the Offer
to Purchase. The offer will also contain instructions and materials necessary
to enable holders to tender notes pursuant to the offer.
A holder may tender all or any portion of its notes pursuant to an Offer
to Purchase, subject to the requirement that any portion of a note tendered
must be in a multiple of $1,000 principal amount. Holders are entitled to
withdraw notes tendered up to the close of business on the expiration date. On
the purchase date the purchase price will become due and payable on each note
accepted for purchase pursuant to the Offer to Purchase, and interest on notes
purchased will cease to accrue on and after the purchase date.
IPALCO or the Surviving Person, as the case may be, will comply with Rule
14e-1 under the Exchange Act and all other applicable laws in making any Offer
to Purchase, and the above procedures will be deemed modified as necessary to
permit such compliance.
Except as described above, the indenture does not contain provisions that
permit the holder of the notes to require that IPALCO purchase or redeem the
notes in the event of a takeover, recapitalization or similar transaction.
Limitation on Distributions and Intercompany Loans
IPALCO may only and will only permit any of its subsidiaries to (1)
declare, recommend, make or pay any Distribution to any of IPALCO's
stockholders and (2) make any intercompany loan to AES or any of its affiliates
(other than IPALCO or any of its direct or indirect subsidiaries) if there
exists no Event of Default and no such Event of Default will result from the
making of such Distribution or intercompany loan and either:
o at the time and as a result of such Distribution or intercompany
loan, IPALCO's Leverage Ratio does not exceed .67:1, and
IPALCO's Interest Coverage Ratio is not less than 2.5:1; or
o if it is not in compliance with the foregoing ratios, at the
time and as a result of such Distribution or intercompany loan
its senior long term debt rating is at least BBB- (or its then
equivalent) with S&P and Baa3 (or its then equivalent) with
Moody's.
Prior to making any Distribution or intercompany loan described above, the
IPALCO Board of Directors (including the independent director) must have
confirmed that such Distribution or intercompany loan complies with this
"Limitation on Distributions and Intercompany Loans" covenant, provided that,
in the case of a Distribution or intercompany loan to be made under the
circumstances described in the first bullet point above, the IPALCO Board of
Directors shall first have obtained a compliance certificate from an officer of
IPALCO that, at the time and after giving effect to such Distribution or
intercompany loan, IPALCO is in compliance with the Leverage Ratio and the
Interest Coverage Ratio set forth above. The foregoing board approval will not
be required in the case of intercompany loans, however, if the aggregate amount
of intercompany loans outstanding at any one time does not exceed $20 million.
Limitation on Indebtedness
IPALCO may not incur any Indebtedness other than:
58
o as part of IPALCO's permitted businesses and activities
described under "--Limitation on Business Activities" below;
o Indebtedness outstanding on the date of original issue of the
old notes under IPALCO's agreements then in existence and
extensions of such Indebtedness;
o other Indebtedness (including Permitted Debt) incurred
subsequent to receipt of written confirmation from the Rating
Agencies that at the time and as a result of such incurrence its
senior long term debt rating is at least BBB- (or its then
equivalent) with S&P and Baa3 (or its then equivalent) with
Moody's; and
o Indebtedness incurred for the purpose of refinancing outstanding
Indebtedness.
The indenture does not in any way restrict or prevent IPL or any other
subsidiary from incurring indebtedness, including secured indebtedness.
Limitations on Liens
Liens on the IPL Stock. IPALCO may not secure any Indebtedness of any
Person (other than IPALCO) by a Lien upon any common stock of IPL.
Liens on Property or Assets other than the IPL Stock. Neither IPALCO nor
any Significant Subsidiary may issue, assume or guarantee any Indebtedness
secured by a Lien upon any property or assets (other than any capital stock of
IPL or cash or cash equivalents) of IPALCO or such Significant Subsidiary, as
applicable, without effectively providing that the outstanding notes (together
with, if IPALCO so determines, any other indebtedness or obligation then
existing or thereafter created ranking equally with the notes) will be secured
equally and ratably with (or prior to) such Indebtedness so long as such
Indebtedness is so secured.
The foregoing limitation on Liens will not, however, apply to:
(1) Liens in existence on the date of original issue of the old notes;
(2) any Lien created or arising over any property which is acquired,
constructed or created by IPALCO or any of its Significant
Subsidiaries, but only if:
(a) such Lien secures only principal amounts (not exceeding the
cost of such acquisition, construction or creation) raised
for the purposes of such acquisition, construction or
creation, together with any costs, expenses, interest and
fees incurred in relation to that property or a guarantee
given in respect of that property;
(b) such Lien is created or arises on or before 180 days after
the completion of such acquisition, construction or
creation; and
(c) such Lien is confined solely to the property so acquired,
constructed or created;
(3) (a) rights of financial institutions to offset credit
balances in connection with the operation of cash
management programs established for the benefit of IPALCO
and/or a Significant Subsidiary or in connection with the
issuance of letters of credit for the benefit of IPALCO
and/or a Significant Subsidiary;
(b) any Lien on accounts receivable securing Indebtedness of
IPALCO and/or a Significant Subsidiary incurred in
connection with the financing of such accounts receivable;
59
(c) any Lien incurred or deposits made in the ordinary course
of business, including, but not limited to, (1) any
mechanics', materialmen's, carriers', workmen's, vendors'
and other like Liens and (2) any Liens securing amounts in
connection with workers' compensation, unemployment
insurance and other types of social security;
(d) any Lien upon specific items of inventory or other goods of
IPALCO and/or a Significant Subsidiary and the proceeds
thereof securing obligations of IPALCO and/or a Significant
Subsidiary in respect of bankers' acceptances issued or
created for the account of such person to facilitate the
purchase, shipment or storage of such inventory or other
goods;
(e) any Lien incurred or deposits made securing the performance
of tenders, bids, leases, trade contracts (other than for
borrowed money), statutory obligations, surety bonds,
appeal bonds, government contracts, performance bonds,
return-of-money bonds, letters of credit not securing
borrowings and other obligations of like nature incurred in
the ordinary course of business;
(f) any Lien created by IPALCO or a Significant Subsidiary
under or in connection with or arising out of a Currency,
Interest Rate or Commodity Agreement or any transactions or
arrangements entered into in connection with the hedging or
management of risks relating to the electricity or natural
gas distribution industry, including a right of set off or
right over a margin call account or any form of cash or
cash collateral or any similar arrangement for obligations
incurred in respect of Currency, Interest Rate or Commodity
Agreements;
(g) any Lien arising out of title retention or like provisions
in connection with the purchase of goods and equipment in
the ordinary course of business; and
(h) any Lien securing reimbursement obligations under letters
of credit, guaranties and other forms of credit enhancement
given in connection with the purchase of goods and
equipment in the ordinary course of business;
(4) Liens in favor of IPALCO or a subsidiary of IPALCO;
(5) (a) Liens on any property or assets acquired from an entity
which is merged with or into IPALCO or a Significant
Subsidiary or any Liens on the property or assets of any
entity existing at the time such entity becomes a
subsidiary of IPALCO and, in either case, is not created in
anticipation of the transaction, unless the Lien was
created to secure or provide for the payment of any part of
the purchase price of that entity;
(b) any Lien on any property or assets existing at the time of
its acquisition and which is not created in anticipation of
such acquisition, unless the Lien was created to secure or
provide for the payment of any part of the purchase price
of such property or assets; and
(c) any Lien created or outstanding on or over any asset of any
entity which becomes a Significant Subsidiary on or after
the date of the issuance of the notes, where the Lien is
created prior to the date on which that entity becomes a
Significant Subsidiary;
(6) (a) Liens required by any contract, statute or regulation
in order to permit IPALCO or a Significant Subsidiary to
perform any contract or subcontract made by it with or at
the request of a governmental entity or any governmental
department, agency or instrumentality, or to secure
partial, progress, advance or any other payments by IPALCO
or a Significant Subsidiary to such governmental unit under
the provisions of any contract, statute or regulation;
(b) any Lien securing industrial revenue, development,
pollution control, solid waste disposal or similar bonds
issued by or for the benefit of IPALCO or a Significant
Subsidiary, provided that
60
such industrial revenue, development, pollution control or
similar bonds do not provide recourse generally to IPALCO
and/or such Significant Subsidiary; and
(c) any Lien securing taxes or assessments or other applicable
governmental charges or levies;
(7) any Lien which arises under any order of attachment, restraint
or similar legal process arising in connection with court
proceedings and any Lien which secures the reimbursement
obligation for any bond obtained in connection with an appeal
taken in any court proceeding, so long as the execution or other
enforcement of such Lien arising under such legal process is
effectively stayed and the claims secured by that Lien are being
contested in good faith and, if appropriate, by appropriate
legal proceedings, and any Lien in favor of a plaintiff or
defendant in any action before a court or tribunal as security
for costs and/or expenses;
(8) any extension, renewal or replacement (or successive extensions,
renewals or replacements), as a whole or in part, of any Liens
referred to in the foregoing clauses, for amounts not exceeding
the principal amount of the Indebtedness secured by the Lien so
extended, renewed or replaced, provided that such extension,
renewal or replacement Lien is limited to all or a part of the
same property or assets that were covered by the Lien extended,
renewed or replaced (plus improvements on such property or
assets);
(9) any Lien created in connection with Project Finance Debt;
(10) any Lien created by IPL or its subsidiaries securing
Indebtedness of IPL or its subsidiaries;
(11) any Lien created in connection with the securitization of some
or all of the assets of IPL and the associated issuance of
Indebtedness as authorized by applicable state or federal law in
connection with the restructuring of jurisdictional electric or
gas businesses; and
(12) any Lien on stock created in connection with a mandatorily
convertible or exchangeable stock or debt financing, provided
that any such financing may not be secured by or otherwise
involve the creation of a Lien on any capital stock of IPL or
any successor entity to IPL.
Notwithstanding the foregoing restriction on liens on property or assets
other than capital stock of IPL, IPALCO and its Significant Subsidiaries may
create Liens over any of such of their respective properties or assets so long
as the aggregate amount of Indebtedness secured by all such Liens (excluding
therefrom the amount of Indebtedness secured by Liens set forth in clauses (1)
through (12), inclusive, above) does not exceed 10% of Consolidated Net
Tangible Assets in the aggregate calculated as of the date of creation of such
Liens (based upon the Consolidated Net Tangible Assets appearing on the most
recently available balance sheet for the most recently concluded calendar
quarter).
Limitation on Business Activities
IPALCO may, and must cause its Significant Subsidiaries to, engage only
in:
o those types of business and other activities in which IPALCO or
any of its direct or indirect subsidiaries or controlled
partnerships or joint ventures are engaged on the date of
original issue of the old notes (including, without limitation,
any geographic or other expansion of such business or
activities); and
o any other business or activity which is deemed necessary, useful
or desirable in connection with such existing businesses and
activities or any such permitted additional geographic or other
expansions of such businesses and activities.
61
Events of Default
An Event of Default with respect to the notes of any series is defined in
the indenture as being:
(1) default for 30 days in the payment of any interest on the notes of
that series;
(2) default in the payment of principal of or any premium on, the notes
of that series at maturity, upon redemption, upon required purchase,
upon acceleration or otherwise;
(3) default in the performance, or breach, of any covenant or obligation
of IPALCO in the indenture and continuance of the default or breach
for a period of 30 days after written notice specifying the default
is given to IPALCO by the trustee or to IPALCO and the trustee by the
holders of at least 25% in aggregate principal amount of the notes of
that series;
(4) default in the payment of the principal of any bond, debenture, note
or other evidence of indebtedness, in each case for money borrowed,
issued by IPALCO, or in the payment of principal under any mortgage,
indenture or instrument under which there may be issued or by which
there may be secured or evidenced any Indebtedness for Borrowed
Money, of IPALCO or any Significant Subsidiary if such Indebtedness
for Borrowed Money is not Project Finance Debt and provides for
recourse generally to IPALCO or any Significant Subsidiary, which
default for payment of principal is in an aggregate principal amount
exceeding $25 million when such indebtedness becomes due and payable
(whether at maturity, upon redemption or acceleration or otherwise),
if such default shall continue unremedied or unwaived for more than
30 Business Days and the time for payment of such amount has not been
expressly extended (until such time as such payment default is
remedied, cured or waived);
(5) a court having jurisdiction enters a decree or order for:
o relief in respect of IPALCO or any of its Significant
Subsidiaries in an involuntary case under any applicable
bankruptcy, insolvency, or other similar law now or hereafter in
effect;
o appointment of a receiver, liquidator, assignee, custodian,
trustee, sequestrator, or similar official of IPALCO or any of
its Significant Subsidiaries or for all or substantially all of
the property and assets of IPALCO or any of its Significant
Subsidiaries; or
o the winding up or liquidation of the affairs of IPALCO or any of
its Significant Subsidiaries;
o and, in each case, such decree or order shall remain unstayed
and in effect for a period of 60 consecutive days;
(6) IPALCO or any of its Significant Subsidiaries:
o commences a voluntary case under any applicable bankruptcy,
insolvency, or other similar law now or hereafter in effect, or
consents to the entry of an order for relief in an involuntary
case under any such law;
o consents to the appointment of or taking possession by a
receiver, liquidator, assignee, custodian, trustee,
sequestrator, or similar official of IPALCO or any of its
Significant Subsidiaries or for all or substantially all of the
property and assets of IPALCO or any of its Significant
Subsidiaries; or
o effects any general assignment for the benefit of creditors; or
(7) the trustee fails to have a perfected security interest in the Pledged
Stock of IPL for a period of 10 days.
62
If an Event of Default (other than an Event of Default specified in
clauses (5) or (6) with respect to IPALCO) occurs with respect to a series of
the notes and continues, then the trustee or the holders of at least 25% in
principal amount of the notes of that series then outstanding may, by written
notice to IPALCO, and the trustee at the request of at least 25% in principal
amount of the notes of that series then outstanding will, declare the
principal, premium, if any, and accrued interest on the outstanding notes to be
immediately due and payable. Upon a declaration of acceleration, the principal,
premium, if any, and accrued interest shall be immediately due and payable.
If an Event of Default specified in clauses (5) or (6) above occurs with
respect to IPALCO, the principal, premium, if any, and accrued interest on the
notes shall be immediately due and payable, without any declaration or other
act on the part of the trustee or any holder.
The holders of at least a majority in principal amount of an outstanding
series of notes may, by written notice to IPALCO and to the trustee, waive all
past defaults with respect to that series of notes and rescind and annul a
declaration of acceleration with respect to that series of notes and its
consequences if:
o all existing Events of Default applicable to the notes of that
series other than the nonpayment of the principal, premium, if
any, and interest on the notes of that series that have become
due solely by that declaration of acceleration, have been cured
or waived; and
o the rescission would not conflict with any judgment or decree of
a court of competent jurisdiction.
No holder of the notes of a series will have any right to institute any
proceeding, judicial or otherwise, with respect to the indenture, or for the
appointment of a receiver or trustee, or for any other remedy under the
indenture, unless:
o such holder has previously given written notice to the trustee
of a continuing Event of Default with respect to the notes of
that series;
o the holders of not less than 25% in principal amount of the
notes of that series shall have made written request to a
responsible officer of the trustee to institute proceedings in
respect of such Event of Default in its own name as trustee;
o such holder or holders have offered the trustee indemnity
satisfactory to the trustee against the costs, expenses and
liabilities to be incurred in compliance with such request;
o the trustee, for 60 days after its receipt of such notice,
request and offer of indemnity, has failed to institute any such
proceeding; and
o no direction inconsistent with such written request has been
given to the trustee during such 60-day period by the holders of
a majority in principal amount of the outstanding notes of that
series.
However, these limitations do not apply to the right of any holder of a
security to receive payment of the principal, premium, if any, or interest on,
that security or to bring suit for the enforcement of any payment, on or after
the due date expressed in the notes, which right shall not be impaired or
affected without the consent of the holder.
The indenture requires that certain of IPALCO's officers certify, on or
before a date not more than 120 days after the end of each fiscal year, that to
the best of those officers' knowledge, IPALCO has fulfilled all its obligations
under the indenture. IPALCO is also obligated to notify the trustee of any
default or defaults in the performance of any covenants or agreements under the
indenture provided, however, that a failure by IPALCO to deliver such notice of
a default shall not constitute a default of the indenture, if IPALCO has
remedied such default within any applicable cure period.
63
No Liability of Directors, Officers, Employees, Incorporators and Stockholders
No director, officer, employee, incorporator, member or stockholder of
IPALCO, as such, will have any liability for any obligations of IPALCO under
the notes or the indenture or for any claim based on, in respect of, or by
reason of, such obligations. Each holder of notes by accepting a note waives
and releases all such liability. The waiver and release are part of the
consideration for issuance of the notes. This waiver may not be effective to
waive liabilities under the federal securities laws and it is the view of the
SEC that such a waiver is against public policy.
Amendments and Waivers
Amendments Without Consent of Holders. IPALCO and the trustee may amend or
supplement the indenture or the notes without notice to or the consent of any
noteholder
(1) to cure any ambiguity, defect or inconsistency in the indenture or
the notes;
(2) to comply with "--Limitations on Consolidation, Merger, Conveyance,
Sale, or Lease";
(3) to comply with any requirements of the SEC in connection with the
qualification of the indenture under the Trust Indenture Act;
(4) to evidence and provide for the acceptance of appointment hereunder
by a successor trustee;
(5) to provide for uncertificated notes in addition to or in place of
certificated notes, subject to certain conditions;
(6) to provide for any guarantee of the notes, to secure the notes or to
confirm and evidence the release, termination or discharge of any
guarantee of or lien securing the notes when such release,
termination or discharge is permitted by the indenture;
(7) to provide for or confirm the issuance of additional notes;
(8) to make any other change that does not materially and adversely
affect the rights of any holder.
Amendments With Consent of Holders. (a) Except as otherwise provided in
"--Events of Default" or paragraph (b), IPALCO and the trustee may amend the
indenture with respect to the notes of any series with the written consent of
the holders of a majority in principal amount of the outstanding notes of such
series and the holders of a majority in principal amount of the outstanding
notes of any series may waive future compliance by IPALCO with any provision of
the indenture with respect to the notes of any series.
(b) Notwithstanding the provisions of paragraph (a), without the consent
of each holder of notes of any series affected, an amendment or waiver may not
(1) reduce the principal amount of or change the stated maturity
of any installment of principal of the notes of that series,
(2) reduce the rate of or change the stated maturity of any
interest payment on the notes of that series,
(3) reduce the amount payable upon the redemption of the notes
of that series or, in respect of an optional redemption, change the
times at which the notes of that series may be redeemed or, once
notice of redemption has been given, the time at which it must
thereupon be redeemed,
(4) make the notes of that series payable in money other than
that stated in such notes,
64
(5) impair the right of any holder of notes of that series to
receive any principal payment or interest payment on such holder's
notes, on or after the stated maturity thereof, or to institute suit
for the enforcement of any such payment,
(6) make any change in the percentage of the principal amount of
the notes of that series required for amendments or waivers, or
(7) modify or change any provision of the indenture affecting
the ranking of the notes of that series in a manner adverse to the
holders of the notes of that series.
It is not necessary for noteholders to approve the particular form of any
proposed amendment, supplement or waiver, but is sufficient if their consent
approves the substance thereof.
Neither IPALCO nor any of its Subsidiaries or Affiliates may, directly or
indirectly, pay or cause to be paid any consideration, whether by way of
interest, fee or otherwise, to any holder for or as an inducement to any
consent, waiver or amendment of any of the terms or provisions of the indenture
or the notes of any series unless such consideration is offered to be paid or
agreed to be paid to all holders of the notes of that series that consent,
waive or agree to amend such term or provision within the time period set forth
in the solicitation documents relating to the consent, waiver or amendment.
Defeasance and Discharge
The indenture provides that IPALCO is deemed to have paid and will be
discharged from all obligations in respect of the notes of any series on the
123rd day after the deposit referred to below has been made, and that the
provisions of the indenture will no longer be in effect with respect to the
notes of that series (except for, among other matters, certain obligations to
register the transfer or exchange of the notes of that series, to replace
stolen, lost or mutilated notes of such series, to maintain paying agencies and
to hold monies for payment in trust) if, among other things,
(1) IPALCO has deposited with the trustee, in trust, money
and/or U.S. Government Obligations that, through the payment of
interest and principal in respect thereof, will provide money in an
amount sufficient to pay the principal, premium, if any, and accrued
interest on the notes of that series, on the due date thereof or
earlier redemption (irrevocably provided for under arrangements
satisfactory to the trustee), as the case may be, in accordance with
the terms of the indenture,
(2) IPALCO has delivered to the trustee
o either an opinion of counsel to the effect that holders of notes
of that series will not recognize income, gain or loss for
federal income tax purposes as a result of the exercise of
IPALCO's option under this "Defeasance" provision and will be
subject to federal income tax on the same amount and in the same
manner and at the same times as would have been the case if the
deposit, defeasance and discharge had not occurred, which
opinion of counsel must be based upon a ruling of the Internal
Revenue Service to the same effect unless there has been a
change in applicable federal income tax law or related treasury
regulations after the date of the indenture, or
o a ruling directed to the trustee received from the Internal
Revenue Service to the same effect as the aforementioned opinion
of counsel
(3) an opinion of counsel to the effect that the creation of the
defeasance trust does not violate the Investment Company act of 1940
and after the passage of 123 days following the deposit, the trust
fund will not be subject to the effect of Section 547 of the U.S.
Bankruptcy Code or Section 15 of the New York Debtor and Creditor
Law,
65
(4) immediately after giving effect to that deposit on a pro
forma basis, no Event of Default has occurred and is continuing on
the date of the deposit or during the period ending on the 123rd day
after the date of the deposit, and the deposit will not result in a
breach or violation of, or constitute a default under, any other
agreement or instrument to which IPALCO is a party or by which it is
bound, and
(5) if at that time any notes of that series are listed on a
national securities exchange, IPALCO has delivered to the trustee an
opinion of counsel to the effect that the notes of that series will
not be delisted as a result of a deposit, defeasance and discharge.
As more fully described in the indenture, the indenture also provides for
defeasance of certain covenants.
Concerning the Trustee
Bank One, National Association is the trustee under the indenture. Bank
One, National Association is also currently the trustee with respect to certain
debt issues of AES and IPL.
Except during the continuance of an Event of Default, the trustee need
perform only those duties that are specifically set forth in the indenture and
no others, and no implied covenants or obligations will be read into the
indenture against the trustee. In case an Event of Default has occurred and is
continuing, the trustee shall exercise those rights and powers vested in it by
the indenture and use the same degree of care and skill in their exercise as a
prudent man would exercise or use under the circumstances in the conduct of his
own affairs. No provision of the indenture will require the trustee to expend
or risk its own funds or otherwise incur any financial liability in the
performance of its duties thereunder, or in the exercise of its rights or
powers, unless it receives indemnity satisfactory to it against any loss,
liability or expense.
The indenture and provisions of the Trust Indenture Act incorporated by
reference therein contain limitations on the rights of the trustee, should it
become a creditor of IPALCO, to obtain payment of claims in certain cases, or
to realize on certain property received in respect of any such claim as
security or otherwise. The trustee is permitted to engage in other transactions
with IPALCO and its Affiliates; provided that if it acquires any conflicting
interest it must either eliminate the conflict within 90 days, apply to the SEC
for permission to continue or resign.
Form, Denomination and Registration of Notes
The notes will be issued in registered form, without interest coupons, in
denominations of $1,000 and integral multiples thereof, in the form of global
notes, as further provided below.
The trustee is not required (i) to issue, register the transfer of or
exchange any note for a period of 15 days before a selection of notes to be
redeemed or purchased pursuant to an Offer to Purchase, (ii) to register the
transfer of or exchange any note so selected for redemption or purchase in
whole or in part, except, in the case of a partial redemption or purchase, that
portion of any note not being redeemed or purchased, or (iii) if a redemption
or a purchase pursuant to an Offer to Purchase is to occur after a regular
record date but on or before the corresponding interest payment date, to
register the transfer or exchange of any note on or after the regular record
date and before the date of redemption or purchase. See "--Global Notes" and
"--Certificated Notes" for a description of additional transfer restrictions
applicable to the notes.
No service charge will be imposed in connection with any transfer or
exchange of any note, but IPALCO may in general require payment of a sum
sufficient to cover any transfer tax or similar governmental charge payable in
connection therewith.
Global Notes
Global notes will be deposited with a custodian for DTC, and registered in
the name of a nominee of DTC. Beneficial interests in the global notes will be
shown on records maintained by DTC and its direct and indirect participants. So
long as DTC or its nominee is the registered owner or holder of a global note,
DTC or such nominee
66
will be considered the sole owner or holder of the notes represented by such
global note for all purposes under the indenture and the notes. No owner of a
beneficial interest in a global note will be able to transfer such interest
except in accordance with DTC's applicable procedures and the applicable
procedures of its direct and indirect participants.
The custodian and DTC will electronically record the principal amount of
notes represented by global notes held within DTC. Investors may hold their
beneficial interests in the global note directly through DTC if they are
participants in DTC, or indirectly through organizations which are participants
in DTC.
Payments of principal and interest under each global note will be made to
DTC's nominee as the registered owner of such global note. IPALCO expects that
the nominee, upon receipt of any such payment, will immediately credit DTC
participants' accounts with payments proportional to their respective
beneficial interests in the principal amount of the relevant global note as
shown on the records of DTC. IPALCO also expects that payments by DTC
participants to owners of beneficial interests will be governed by standing
instructions and customary practices, as is now the case with securities held
for the accounts of customers registered in the names of nominees for such
customers. Such payments will be the responsibility of such participants, and
none of IPALCO, the trustee, the custodian or any paying agent or registrar
will have any responsibility or liability for any aspect of the records
relating to or payments made on account of beneficial interests in any global
note or for maintaining or reviewing any records relating to such beneficial
interests.
Certificated Notes
If DTC notifies IPALCO that it is unwilling or unable to continue as
depositary for a global note and a successor depositary is not appointed by
IPALCO within 90 days of such notice, or an Event of Default has occurred and
the trustee has received a request from DTC, the trustee will exchange each
beneficial interest in that global note for one or more certificated notes
registered in the name of the owner of such beneficial interest, as identified
by DTC.
Same Day Settlement and Payment
The indenture will require that payments in respect of the notes
represented by the global notes be made by wire transfer of immediately
available funds to the accounts specified by holders of the global notes. With
respect to notes in certificated form, IPALCO will make all payments by wire
transfer of immediately available funds to the accounts specified by the
holders thereof or, if no such account is specified, by mailing a check to each
holder's registered address.
The notes represented by the global notes are expected to be eligible to
trade in the PORTAL market and to trade in DTC's Same-Day Funds Settlement
System, and any permitted secondary market trading activity in such notes will,
therefore, be required by DTC to be settled in immediately available funds.
IPALCO expects that secondary trading in any certificated notes will also be
settled in immediately available funds.
Governing Law
The indenture and the notes shall be governed by, and construed in
accordance with, the laws of the State of New York.
Certain Definitions
Set forth below are certain defined terms used in the indenture. We refer
you to the indenture for a full disclosure of all such terms, as well as any
other capitalized terms used in this section of the prospectus for which no
definition is provided.
"Adjusted Total Capital" of any Person is defined to mean, as of any date,
the sum (without duplication) of:
67
(1) Indebtedness for Borrowed Money;
(2) preferred stock and Preferred Securities of such Person and its
consolidated subsidiaries;
(3) consolidated stockholder's equity of such Person and its consolidated
subsidiaries (excluding any preferred stock in stockholder's equity);
and
(4) any excess of the value of the assets of IPALCO when acquired by AES
over the book value of such assets at such time, which for the
purpose of this definition is agreed to be $1.5 billion.
"Capitalized Lease Obligations" means all lease obligations of IPALCO and
its subsidiaries which, under GAAP, are or will be required to be capitalized,
in each case taken at the amount of the lease obligation accounted for as
indebtedness in conformity with those principles.
"Comparable Treasury Issue" means, with respect to any notes to be
redeemed, the United States Treasury security selected by an independent
investment banking institution of international standing appointed by IPALCO as
having a maturity comparable to the remaining term of such notes that would be
used, at the time of selection and in accordance with customary financial
practice, in pricing new issues of corporate debt securities of comparable
maturity to the remaining term of such securities.
"Comparable Treasury Price" means, with respect to any Comparable Treasury
Issue:
o the average of the bid and asked prices for the Comparable
Treasury Issue, expressed in each case as a percentage of its
principal amount, on the third Business Day preceding the
redemption date of the notes to be redeemed, as set forth in the
daily statistical release (or any successor release) published
by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York and designated
"Composite 3:30 p.m. Quotations for U.S. Government Securities";
or
o if such release (or any successor release) is not published or
does not contain such prices on such Business Day, the average,
as determined by IPALCO, of the bid and asked prices for the
Comparable Treasury Issue, expressed in each case as a
percentage of its principal amount and quoted in writing to
IPALCO by a primary U.S. government securities dealer in New
York City appointed by IPALCO at 5:00 p.m. on the third Business
Day preceding such redemption date.
"Consolidated Current Liabilities" means the consolidated current
liabilities of IPALCO and its subsidiaries, but excluding the current portion
of long term Indebtedness which would otherwise be included in it, as
determined on a consolidated basis in accordance with GAAP.
"Consolidated Debt" means, at any time, the sum of the aggregate
outstanding principal amount of all Indebtedness for Borrowed Money (including,
without limitation, the principal component of Capitalized Lease Obligations,
but excluding Permitted Debt, Currency, Interest Rate or Commodity Agreements
and all Consolidated Current Liabilities and Project Finance Debt) of IPALCO
and its subsidiaries, as determined on a consolidated basis in conformity with
GAAP.
"Consolidated EBITDA" means, for any period, the sum of the amounts for
that period of IPALCO's:
(1) Consolidated Net Income;
(2) distributions paid, accrued or scheduled to be paid in respect of any
Preferred Securities or other capital stock to the extent deducted in
calculating Consolidated Net Income;
(3) Consolidated Interest Expense plus interest paid, accrued or
scheduled to be paid or to be accrued in respect of any Permitted
Debt;
68
(4) income taxes and deferred taxes (other than income taxes--either
positive or negative--attributable to extraordinary and non-recurring
gains or losses or sales of assets);
(5) depreciation expense;
(6) amortization expense; and
(7) all other non-cash items reducing Consolidated Net Income, less all
non-cash items increasing Consolidated Net Income, all as determined
on a consolidated basis in conformity with GAAP,
provided that, to the extent that IPALCO has any subsidiary that is not a
wholly-owned subsidiary, Consolidated EBITDA will be reduced by an amount equal
to the Consolidated Net Income of such subsidiary multiplied by the quotient
of:
o the number of shares of outstanding common stock of such
subsidiary not owned on the relevant Measurement Date by IPALCO
or any subsidiary of IPALCO, divided by
o the total number of shares of outstanding common stock of such
subsidiary on the relevant Measurement Date.
"Consolidated Interest Expense" means, for any period, the aggregate
amount of interest in respect of Indebtedness for Borrowed Money (excluding
interest expense related to Permitted Debt and including amortization of
original issue discount on any Indebtedness and the interest portion of any
deferred payment obligation, calculated in accordance with the effective
interest method of accounting; and all commissions, discounts and other fees
and charges owed with respect to bankers' acceptance financing) and the net
costs associated with Interest Rate Agreements and all but the principal
component of rentals in respect of Capitalized Lease Obligations, paid, accrued
or scheduled to be paid or to be accrued by IPALCO and each of its subsidiaries
during such period, excluding, however, any amount of such interest of any
subsidiary of IPALCO if the net income (or loss) of such subsidiary is excluded
from the calculation of Consolidated Net Income for such subsidiary pursuant to
clause (2) of the definition of Consolidated Net Income (but only in the same
proportion as the net income (or loss) of such subsidiary is excluded), less
consolidated interest income, all as determined on a consolidated basis in
conformity with GAAP;
provided that, to the extent that IPALCO has any subsidiary that is not a
wholly-owned subsidiary, Consolidated Interest Expense shall be reduced by an
amount equal to such interest expense of such subsidiary multiplied by the
quotient of:
o the number of shares of outstanding common stock of such
subsidiary not owned on the relevant Measurement Date by IPALCO
or any subsidiary of IPALCO, divided by
o the total number of shares of outstanding common stock of such
subsidiary on the relevant Measurement Date.
"Consolidated Net Income" means, for any period, the aggregate of the net
income (or loss) of IPALCO and its subsidiaries for such period, as determined
on a consolidated basis in conformity with GAAP; provided that the following
items will be excluded from any calculation of Consolidated Net Income (without
duplication):
(1) the net income (or loss) of any person (other than a subsidiary) in
which any other person has a joint interest, except to the extent of
the amount of dividends or other distributions actually paid to
IPALCO or another subsidiary of IPALCO during such period;
(2) the net income (or loss) of any subsidiary to the extent that the
declaration or payment of dividends or similar distributions by such
subsidiary of such net income is not at the time permitted by the
operation of
69
the terms of its charter or any agreement, instrument, judgment,
decree, order, statute, rule or governmental regulation or license;
(3) all extraordinary gains and extraordinary losses, merger-related
expenses and one-time expenses, cash or noncash, relating to
restructuring efforts; and
(4) all gains and losses from discontinued operations.
"Consolidated Net Tangible Assets" means at any time, the total of all
assets (including revaluations of those assets as a result of commercial
appraisals, price level restatement or otherwise) appearing on the most
recently available consolidated balance sheet of IPALCO and its subsidiaries
(provided that such balance sheet is of a date not more than 60 days prior to
the date of creation of the relevant Lien) prepared in accordance with GAAP,
net of applicable reserves and deductions, but excluding goodwill, trade names,
trademarks, patents, unamortized debt discount and all other like intangible
assets (which term shall not be construed to include such revaluations), less
the aggregate of the Consolidated Current Liabilities of IPALCO appearing on
such balance sheet.
"Currency, Interest Rate or Commodity Agreements" means an agreement or
transaction involving any currency, interest rate or energy price or volumetric
swap, cap or collar arrangement, forward exchange transaction, option, warrant,
forward rate agreement, futures contract or other derivative instrument of any
kind for the hedging or management of foreign exchange, interest rate or energy
price or volumetric risks, it being understood, for purposes of this
definition, that the term "energy" will include, without limitation, coal, gas,
oil and electricity.
"Default" with respect to the notes of any series means any event that is,
or after notice or passage of time or both would be, an Event of Default with
respect to the notes of that series.
"Distribution" means any dividend, distribution or payment (including by
way of redemption, repurchase, retirement, return or repayment) in respect of
shares of capital stock of IPALCO, or any purchase of any shares of capital
stock of AES, excluding any contract adjustment payments under contracts to
purchase common stock of IPALCO, AES or any of its affiliates (which common
stock was not held as an asset of IPALCO) entered into in connection with the
issuance of any Permitted Debt.
"DTC" means The Depository Trust Company.
"Excluded Subsidiary" means any subsidiary of IPALCO:
(1) in respect of which neither IPALCO nor any subsidiary of IPALCO
(other than another Excluded Subsidiary) has undertaken any legal
obligation to give any guarantee for the benefit of the holders of
any Indebtedness for Borrowed Money (other than to another member of
the Group) other than in respect of any statutory obligation and the
subsidiaries of which are all Excluded Subsidiaries; and
(2) which has been designated as such by IPALCO by written notice to the
Trustee; provided that IPALCO may give written notice to the Trustee
at any time that any Excluded Subsidiary is no longer an Excluded
Subsidiary whereupon it shall cease to be an Excluded Subsidiary.
"GAAP" means generally accepted accounting principles in the United States
as in effect from time to time.
"Group" means IPALCO and its subsidiaries and "member of the Group" shall
be construed accordingly.
"incur" means, with respect to any Indebtedness, to incur, create, issue,
assume or guarantee or otherwise become liable for such Indebtedness; provided
that neither the accrual of interest (whether such interest is payable in cash
or in kind) nor the accretion of original issue discount shall be considered an
"incurrence" of Indebtedness.
"Indebtedness" means, with respect to IPALCO or any of its subsidiaries at
any date of determination (without duplication):
70
(1) all Indebtedness for Borrowed Money (excluding any credit which is
available but undrawn);
(2) all obligations in respect of letters of credit (including
reimbursement obligations with respect to letters of credit);
(3) all obligations to pay the deferred and unpaid purchase price of
property or services, which purchase price is due more than six
months after the date of placing such property in service or taking
delivery and title to the property or the completion of such
services, except trade payables;
(4) all Capitalized Lease Obligations;
(5) all indebtedness of other persons secured by a mortgage, charge,
lien, pledge or other security interest on any asset of IPALCO or any
of its subsidiaries, whether or not such indebtedness is assumed;
provided that the amount of such Indebtedness must be the lesser of:
(a) the fair market value of such asset at such date of determination
and (b) the amount of the secured indebtedness;
(6) all indebtedness of other persons of the types specified in the
preceding clauses (1) through (5), to the extent such indebtedness is
guaranteed by IPALCO or any of its subsidiaries; and
(7) to the extent not otherwise included in this definition, net
obligations under Currency, Interest Rate or Commodity Agreements.
The amount of Indebtedness at any date will be the outstanding balance at
such date of all unconditional obligations as described above and, upon the
occurrence of the contingency giving rise to the obligation, the maximum
liability of any contingent obligations of the types specified in the preceding
clauses (1) through (7) at such date; provided that the amount outstanding at
any time of any Indebtedness issued with original issue discount is the face
amount of such Indebtedness less the remaining unamortized portion of the
original issue discount of such Indebtedness at such time as determined in
conformity with GAAP.
"Indebtedness For Borrowed Money" means any indebtedness (whether being
principal, premium, interest or other amounts) for:
o money borrowed;
o payment obligations under or in respect of any trade acceptance
or trade acceptance credit; or
o any notes, bonds, loan stock or other debt securities offered,
issued or distributed whether by way of public offer, private
placement, acquisition consideration or otherwise and whether
issued for cash or in whole or in part for a consideration other
than cash (including, without limitation, Permitted Debt);
provided, however, in each case, that such term will exclude:
o any indebtedness relating to any accounts receivable
securitizations;
o any Indebtedness of the type permitted to be secured by Liens
pursuant to clause (13) under the caption "--Limitation on
Liens" described above; and
o any Preferred Securities which are issued and outstanding on the
date of original issue of the notes or any extension, renewal or
replacement (or successive extensions, renewals or
replacements), as a whole or in part, of any such existing
Preferred Securities, for amounts not exceeding the principal
amount or liquidation preference of the Preferred Securities so
extended, renewed or replaced.
"Interest Coverage Ratio" means, with respect to IPALCO on any Measurement
Date, the ratio of:
71
(1) the aggregate amount of Consolidated EBITDA of IPALCO for the four
fiscal quarters for which financial information in respect of
Consolidated EBITDA is available immediately prior to such
Measurement Date to
(2) the aggregate Consolidated Interest Expense during such four fiscal
quarters.
"Investments" in any Person means any loan or advance to, any net payment
on a guarantee of, any acquisition of capital stock, equity interest,
obligation or other security of, or capital contribution or other investment
in, such Person. Investments exclude advances to customers and suppliers in the
ordinary course of business.
"Leverage Ratio" means the ratio of Consolidated Debt to Adjusted Total
Capital, calculated on the basis of the most recently available consolidated
balance sheet of IPALCO and its consolidated subsidiaries (provided that such
balance sheet is as of a date not more than 60 days prior to a Measurement
Date) prepared in accordance with GAAP.
"Lien" means any mortgage, lien, pledge, security interest or other
encumbrance; provided, however, that the term "Lien" does not mean any
easements, rights-of-way, restrictions and other similar encumbrances and
encumbrances consisting of zoning restrictions, leases, subleases, restrictions
on the use of property or defects in title.
"Measurement Date" means the record date for any Distribution or the date
of any loan, as the case may be.
"Moody's" means Moody's Investors Service, Inc., and any of its
subsidiaries or successors.
"Permitted Debt" means Indebtedness for Borrowed Money issued in
connection with a contract or contracts to purchase from IPALCO common stock of
IPALCO, AES or any affiliate of AES (which common stock was not held as an
asset of IPALCO) for an aggregate amount equal to the aggregate principal
amount of such Indebtedness for Borrowed Money.
"Preferred Securities" means, without duplication, any trust preferred or
preferred securities or related debt or guaranties of IPALCO or any of its
subsidiaries.
"Project Finance Debt" means:
o any Indebtedness to finance or refinance the ownership,
acquisition, development, design, engineering, procurement,
construction, servicing, management and/or operation of any
project or asset which is incurred by an Excluded Subsidiary;
and
o any Indebtedness to finance or refinance the ownership,
acquisition, development, design, engineering, procurement,
construction, servicing, management and/or operation of any
project or asset in respect of which the person or persons to
whom any such Indebtedness is or may be owed by the relevant
borrower (whether or not a member of the Group) has or have no
recourse whatsoever to any member of the Group (other than an
Excluded Subsidiary) for the repayment of that Indebtedness
other than: recourse to such member of the Group for amounts
limited to the cash flow or net cash flow (other than historic
cash flow or historic net cash flow) from, or ownership
interests or other investments in, such project or asset; and/or
recourse to such member of the Group for the purpose only of
enabling amounts to be claimed in respect of such Indebtedness
in an enforcement of any encumbrance given by such member of the
Group over such project or asset or the income, cash flow or
other proceeds deriving from the project (or given by any
shareholder or the like, or other investor in, the borrower or
in the owner of such project or asset over its shares or the
like in the capital of, or other investment in, the borrower or
in the owner of such project or asset) to secure such
Indebtedness, provided that the extent of such recourse to such
member of the Group is limited solely to the amount of any
recoveries made on any such enforcement; and/or recourse to such
borrower generally, or directly or indirectly to a member of the
Group, under any form of assurance,
72
indemnity, undertaking or support, which recourse is limited to
a claim for damages (other than liquidated damages and damages
required to be calculated in a specified way) for breach of an
obligation (not being a payment obligation or an obligation to
procure payment by another or an indemnity in respect of a
payment obligation, or any obligation to comply or to procure
compliance by another with any financial ratios or other tests
of financial condition) by the person against which such
recourse is available.
"Rating" means, for each Rating Agency, the credit rating assigned to the
notes by such Rating Agency.
"Rating Agency" means S&P and Moody's, and any of their respective
subsidiaries or successors, or, in any case, if such person ceases to rate any
series of notes for reasons outside the control of IPALCO, any other
"nationally recognized statistical rating organization" (within the meaning of
Rule 15c3-l(c)(2)(vi)(F) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended)
selected by IPALCO as a replacement Rating Agency.
"S&P" means Standard & Poor's Ratings Group, and any of its subsidiaries
or successors.
"Significant Subsidiary" means, at any particular time, any subsidiary of
IPALCO whose gross assets or gross revenues (having regard to IPALCO's direct
and/or indirect beneficial interest in the shares, or the like, of that
subsidiary) represent at least 25% of the consolidated gross assets or, as the
case may be, consolidated gross revenues of IPALCO.
"Subsidiary" means, with respect to any person, any corporation,
association, partnership, limited liability company or other business entity of
which 50% or more of the total voting power of shares of capital stock or other
interests (including partnership interests) entitled (without regard to the
occurrence of any contingency) to vote in the election of directors, managers
or trustees is at the time owned, directly or indirectly, by (1) such person,
(2) such person and one or more subsidiaries of such person or (3) one or more
subsidiaries of such person.
"Treasury Yield" means, with respect to any notes to be redeemed, the rate
per annum equal to the semiannual equivalent yield to maturity of the
Comparable Treasury Issue for such notes, assuming a price for the Comparable
Treasury Issue (expressed as a percentage of its principal amount) equal to its
Comparable Treasury Price.
"U.S. Government Obligation" means any:
(1) security which is: (a) a direct obligation of the United States for
the payment of which the full faith and credit of the United States
is pledged or (b) an obligation of a person controlled or supervised
by and acting as an agency or instrumentality of the United States
the payment of which is unconditionally guaranteed as a full faith
and credit obligation by the United States, which, in the case of
clause (a) or (b), is not callable or redeemable at the option of the
issuer of the obligation, and
(2) depositary receipt issued by a bank (as defined in the Securities
Act) as custodian with respect to any security specified in clause
(1) above and held by such bank for the account of the holder of such
depositary receipt or with respect to any specific payment of
principal of or interest on any such security held by any such bank,
provided that (except as required by law) such custodian is not
authorized to make any deduction from the amount payable to the
holder of such depositary receipt from any amount received by the
custodian in respect of the U.S. Government Obligation or the
specific payment of interest on or principal of the U.S. Government
Obligation evidenced by such depositary receipt.
73
THE EXCHANGE OFFER
In a registration rights agreement between IPALCO and the placement agents
of the old notes, we agreed
(1) to cause a registration statement to be declared effective by the
SEC on or prior to 210 days after the closing of the old notes offering
and
(2) to use our best efforts to consummate the exchange offer and
issue the new notes within the earliest to occur of 30 business days after
the registration statement being declared effective or 30 days after the
effectiveness deadline.
The terms of the notes provide that, if by the date that is 210 days after
the Issue Date (the "effectiveness deadline"), IPALCO has not caused a
registration statement with respect to an exchange offer for the notes or a
shelf registration statement with respect to resales of the notes to be
declared effective, the interest rate on the notes will increase by a rate of
0.50% per annum from the effectiveness deadline until the effectiveness of an
exchange offer registration statement or a shelf registration statement. In
addition the notes provide that, if IPALCO has not consummated a registered
exchange offer on or prior to the earlier to occur of 30 business days after
the effectiveness of an exchange offer registration statement or 30 days after
the effectiveness deadline, the interest rate for each series of notes will
increase by a per annum rate of 0.50% until the consummation of a registered
exchange offer. The interest rate for each series of notes will not increase by
more than 0.50% per annum notwithstanding IPALCO's failure to meet more than
one of these requirements. Once we complete this exchange offer, we will no
longer be required to pay additional interest on the old notes.
The exchange offer is not being made to, nor will we accept tenders for
exchange from, holders of old notes in any jurisdiction in which the exchange
offer or acceptance of the exchange offer would violate the securities or blue
sky laws of that jurisdiction.
Terms of the Exchange Offer; Period for Tendering Old Notes
This prospectus and the accompanying letter of transmittal contain the
terms and conditions of the exchange offer. Upon the terms and subject to the
conditions included in this prospectus and in the accompanying letter of
transmittal, which together are the exchange offer, we will accept for exchange
old notes which are properly tendered on or prior to the expiration date,
unless you have previously withdrawn them.
o When you tender to us old notes as provided below, our acceptance of
the old notes will constitute a binding agreement between you and us
upon the terms and subject to the conditions in this prospectus and
in the accompanying letter of transmittal.
o For each $1,000 principal amount of old notes surrendered to us in
the exchange offer, we will give you $1,000 principal amount of new
notes.
o We will keep the exchange offer open for not less than 20 business
days, or longer if required by applicable law, after the date that we
first mail notice of the exchange offer to the holders of the old
notes. We are sending this prospectus, together with the letter of
transmittal, on or about the date of this prospectus to all of the
registered holders of old notes at their addresses listed in the
trustee's security register with respect to the old notes.
o The exchange offer expires at 5:00 p.m., New York City time, on ,
2002; provided, however, that we, in our sole discretion, may extend
the period of time for which the exchange offer is open. The term
"expiration date" means , 2002 or, if extended by us, the latest time
and date to which the exchange offer is extended.
74
o As of the date of this prospectus, $375,000,000 in aggregate
principal amount of the old 2008 notes and $375,000,000 in aggregate
principal amount of the old 2011 notes were outstanding. The exchange
offer is not conditioned upon any minimum principal amount of old
notes being tendered.
o Our obligation to accept old notes for exchange in the exchange offer
is subject to the conditions that we describe in the section called
"Conditions to the Exchange Offer" below.
o We expressly reserve the right, at any time, to extend the period of
time during which the exchange offer is open, and thereby delay
acceptance of any old notes, by giving oral or written notice of an
extension to the exchange agent and notice of that extension to the
holders as described below. During any extension, all old notes
previously tendered will remain subject to the exchange offer unless
withdrawal rights are exercised. Any old notes not accepted for
exchange for any reason will be returned without expense to the
tendering holder as promptly as practicable after the expiration or
termination of the exchange offer.
o We expressly reserve the right to amend or terminate the exchange
offer, and not to accept for exchange any old notes that we have not
yet accepted for exchange, if any of the conditions of the exchange
offer specified below under "Conditions to the Exchange Offer" are
not satisfied.
o We will give oral or written notice of any extension, amendment,
termination or non-acceptance described above to holders of the old
notes as promptly as practicable. If we extend the expiration date,
we will give notice by means of a press release or other public
announcement no later than 9:00 a.m., New York City time, on the
business day after the previously scheduled expiration date. Without
limiting the manner in which we may choose to make any public
announcement and subject to applicable law, we will have no
obligation to publish, advertise or otherwise communicate any public
announcement other than by issuing a release to the Dow Jones News
Service.
o Holders of old notes do not have any appraisal or dissenters' rights
in connection with the exchange offer.
o Old notes which are not tendered for exchange or are tendered but not
accepted in connection with the exchange offer will remain
outstanding and be entitled to the benefits of the indenture, but
will not be entitled to any further registration rights under the
registration rights agreement.
o We intend to conduct the exchange offer in accordance with the
applicable requirements of the Exchange Act and the rules and
regulations of the SEC thereunder.
o By executing, or otherwise becoming bound by, the letter of
transmittal, you will be making the representations described below
to us. See "--Resales of the New Notes."
Important rules concerning the exchange offer
You should note that:
o All questions as to the validity, form, eligibility, time of receipt
and acceptance of old notes tendered for exchange will be determined
by IPALCO in its sole discretion, which determination shall be final
and binding.
o We reserve the absolute right to reject any and all tenders of any
particular old notes not properly tendered or to not accept any
particular old notes which acceptance might, in our judgment or the
judgment of our counsel, be unlawful.
o We also reserve the absolute right to waive any defects or
irregularities or conditions of the exchange offer as to any
particular old notes either before or after the expiration date,
including the right to waive the ineligibility of any holder who
seeks to tender old notes in the exchange offer. Unless we agree to
75
waive any defect or irregularity in connection with the tender of old
notes for exchange, you must cure any defect or irregularity within
any reasonable period of time as we shall determine.
o Our interpretation of the terms and conditions of the exchange offer
as to any particular old notes either before or after the expiration
date shall be final and binding on all parties.
o Neither IPALCO, the exchange agent nor any other person shall be
under any duty to give notification of any defect or irregularity
with respect to any tender of old notes for exchange, nor shall any
of them incur any liability for failure to give any notification.
Procedures for Tendering Old Notes
What to submit and how
If you, as the registered holder of an old note, wish to tender your old
notes for exchange in the exchange offer, you must transmit a properly
completed and duly executed letter of transmittal to Bank One Trust Company,
N.A. at the address set forth below under "Exchange Agent" on or prior to the
expiration date.
In addition,
(1) certificates for old notes must be received by the exchange agent
along with the letter of transmittal, or
(2) a timely confirmation of a book-entry transfer of old notes, if
such procedure is available, into the exchange agent's account at DTC
using the procedure for book-entry transfer described below, must be
received by the exchange agent prior to the expiration date or
(3) you must comply with the guaranteed delivery procedures described
below.
The method of delivery of old notes, letters of transmittal and notices of
guaranteed delivery is at your election and risk. If delivery is by mail, we
recommend that registered mail, properly insured, with return receipt
requested, be used. In all cases, sufficient time should be allowed to assure
timely delivery. No letters of transmittal or old notes should be sent to
IPALCO.
How to sign your letter of transmittal and other documents
Signatures on a letter of transmittal or a notice of withdrawal, as the
case may be, must be guaranteed unless the old notes being surrendered for
exchange are tendered
(1) by a registered holder of the old notes who has not completed the
box entitled "Special Issuance Instructions" or "Special Delivery
Instructions" on the letter of transmittal or
(2) for the account of an eligible institution.
If signatures on a letter of transmittal or a notice of withdrawal, as the case
may be, are required to be guaranteed, the guarantees must be by any of the
following eligible institutions:
o a firm which is a member of a registered national securities exchange
or a member of the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc.
or
o a commercial bank or trust company having an office or correspondent
in the United States
If the letter of transmittal is signed by a person or persons other than
the registered holder or holders of old notes, the old notes must be endorsed
or accompanied by appropriate powers of attorney, in either case signed
76
exactly as the name or names of the registered holder or holders that appear on
the old notes and with the signature guaranteed.
If the letter of transmittal or any old notes or powers of attorney are
signed by trustees, executors, administrators, guardians, attorneys-in-fact,
officers or corporations or others acting in a fiduciary or representative
capacity, the person should so indicate when signing and, unless waived by
IPALCO, proper evidence satisfactory to IPALCO of its authority to so act must
be submitted.
Acceptance of Old Notes for Exchange; Delivery of New Notes
Once all of the conditions to the exchange offer are satisfied or waived,
we will accept, promptly after the expiration date, all old notes properly
tendered and will issue the new notes promptly after acceptance of the old
notes. See "Conditions to the Exchange Offer" below. For purposes of the
exchange offer, our giving of oral or written notice of our acceptance to the
exchange agent will be considered our acceptance of the exchange offer.
In all cases, we will issue new notes in exchange for old notes that are
accepted for exchange only after timely receipt by the exchange agent of:
o certificates for old notes, or
o a timely book-entry confirmation of transfer of old notes into the
exchange agent's account at DTC using the book-entry transfer
procedures described below, and
o a properly completed and duly executed letter of transmittal.
If we do not accept any tendered old notes for any reason included in the
terms and conditions of the exchange offer or if you submit certificates
representing old notes in a greater principal amount than you wish to exchange,
we will return any unaccepted or non-exchanged old notes without expense to the
tendering holder or, in the case of old notes tendered by book-entry transfer
into the exchange agent's account at DTC using the book-entry transfer
procedures described below, non-exchanged old notes will be credited to an
account maintained with DTC as promptly as practicable after the expiration or
termination of the exchange offer.
Book-Entry Transfer
The exchange agent will make a request to establish an account with
respect to the old notes at DTC for purposes of the exchange offer promptly
after the date of this prospectus. Any financial institution that is a
participant in DTC's systems may make book-entry delivery of old notes by
causing DTC to transfer old notes into the exchange agent's account in
accordance with DTC's Automated Tender Offer Program procedures for transfer.
However, the exchange for the old notes so tendered will only be made after
timely confirmation of book-entry transfer of old notes into the exchange
agent's account, and timely receipt by the exchange agent of an agent's
message, transmitted by DTC and received by the exchange agent and forming a
part of a book-entry confirmation. The agent's message must state that DTC has
received an express acknowledgment from the participant tendering old notes
that are the subject of that book-entry confirmation that the participant has
received and agrees to be bound by the terms of the letter of transmittal, and
that we may enforce the agreement against that participant.
Although delivery of old notes may be effected through book-entry transfer
into the exchange agent's account at DTC, the letter of transmittal, or a
facsimile copy, properly completed and duly executed, with any required
signature guarantees, must in any case be delivered to and received by the
exchange agent at its address listed under "--Exchange Agent" on or prior to
the expiration date.
If your old notes are held through DTC, you must complete a form called
"instructions to registered holder and/or book-entry participant," which will
instruct the DTC participant through whom you hold your notes of your intention
to tender your old notes or not tender your old notes. Please note that
delivery of documents to DTC in accordance with its procedures does not
constitute delivery to the exchange agent and we will not be able to accept
77
your tender of notes until the exchange agent receives a letter of transmittal
and a book-entry confirmation from DTC with respect to your notes. A copy of
that form is available from the exchange agent.
Guaranteed Delivery Procedures
If you are a registered holder of old notes and you want to tender your
old notes but your old notes are not immediately available, or time will not
permit your old notes to reach the exchange agent before the expiration date,
or the procedure for book-entry transfer cannot be completed on a timely basis,
a tender may be effected if
(1) the tender is made through an eligible institution,
(2) prior to the expiration date, the exchange agent receives, by
facsimile transmission, mail or hand delivery, from that eligible
institution a properly completed and duly executed letter of transmittal
and notice of guaranteed delivery, substantially in the form provided by
us, stating:
o the name and address of the holder of old notes
o the amount of old notes tendered
o the tender is being made by delivering that notice and guaranteeing
that within three New York Stock Exchange trading days after the date
of execution of the notice of guaranteed delivery, the certificates
of all physically tendered old notes, in proper form for transfer, or
a book-entry confirmation, as the case may be, will be deposited by
that eligible institution with the exchange agent, and
(3) the certificates for all physically tendered old notes, in proper
form for transfer, or a book-entry confirmation, as the case may be, are
received by the exchange agent within three New York Stock Exchange
trading days after the date of execution of the Notice of Guaranteed
Delivery.
Withdrawal Rights
You can withdraw your tender of old notes at any time on or prior to the
expiration date.
For a withdrawal to be effective, a written notice of withdrawal must be
received by the exchange agent at one of the addresses listed below under
"Exchange Agent." Any notice of withdrawal must specify:
o the name of the person having tendered the old notes to be withdrawn
o the old notes to be withdrawn
o the principal amount of the old notes to be withdrawn
o if certificates for old notes have been delivered to the exchange
agent, the name in which the old notes are registered, if different
from that of the withdrawing holder
o if certificates for old notes have been delivered or otherwise
identified to the exchange agent, then, prior to the release of those
certificates, you must also submit the serial numbers of the
particular certificates to be withdrawn and a signed notice of
withdrawal with signatures guaranteed by an eligible institution
unless you are an eligible institution
o if old notes have been tendered using the procedure for book-entry
transfer described above, any notice of withdrawal must specify the
name and number of the account at DTC to be credited with the
withdrawn old notes and otherwise comply with the procedures of that
facility
78
Please note that all questions as to the validity, form, eligibility and
time of receipt of notices of withdrawal will be determined by us, and our
determination shall be final and binding on all parties. Any old notes so
withdrawn will be considered not to have been validly tendered for exchange for
purposes of the exchange offer.
If you have properly withdrawn old notes and wish to re-tender them, you
may do so by following one of the procedures described under "Procedures for
Tendering Old Notes" above at any time on or prior to the expiration date.
Conditions to the Exchange Offer
Notwithstanding any other provisions of the exchange offer, we will not be
required to accept for exchange, or to issue new notes in exchange for, any old
notes and may terminate or amend the exchange offer, if at any time before the
acceptance of old notes for exchange or the exchange of the new notes for old
notes, that acceptance or issuance would violate applicable law or any
interpretation of the staff of the SEC.
That condition is for our sole benefit and may be asserted by us
regardless of the circumstances giving rise to that condition. Our failure at
any time to exercise the foregoing rights shall not be considered a waiver by
us of that right. Our rights described in the prior paragraph are ongoing
rights which we may assert at any time and from time to time.
In addition, we will not accept for exchange any old notes tendered, and
no new notes will be issued in exchange for any old notes, if at that time any
stop order shall be threatened or in effect with respect to the exchange offer
to which this prospectus relates or the qualification of the indenture under
the Trust Indenture Act.
Exchange Agent
Bank One Trust Company, N.A. has been appointed as the exchange agent for
the exchange offer. All executed letters of transmittal should be directed to
the exchange agent at one of the addresses set forth below. Questions and
requests for assistance, requests for additional copies of this prospectus or
of the letter of transmittal and requests for notices of guaranteed delivery
should be directed to the exchange agent, addressed as follows:
Deliver To:
Bank One Trust Company, N.A., Exchange Agent
One North State Street, 9th Floor
Chicago, IL 60602
Attn: Exchanges
Facsimile Transmissions:
312-407-8853
To Confirm by Telephone
or for Information:
800-524-9472
Delivery to an address other than as listed above or transmission of
instructions via facsimile other than as listed above does not constitute a
valid delivery.
Fees and Expenses
The principal solicitation is being made by mail; however, additional
solicitation may be made by telegraph, telephone or in person by our officers,
regular employees and affiliates. We will not pay any additional compensation
to any of our officers and employees who engage in soliciting tenders. We will
not make any payment to brokers, dealers, or others soliciting acceptances of
the exchange offer. However, we will pay the
79
exchange agent reasonable and customary fees for its services and will
reimburse it for its reasonable out-of-pocket expenses in connection with the
exchange offer.
The estimated cash expenses to be incurred in connection with the exchange
offer, including legal, accounting, SEC filing, printing and exchange agent
expenses, will be paid by us and are estimated in the aggregate to be $434,000.
Transfer Taxes
Holders who tender their old notes for exchange will not be obligated to
pay any transfer taxes in connection therewith, except that holders who
instruct us to register new notes in the name of, or request that old notes not
tendered or not accepted in the exchange offer be returned to, a person other
than the registered tendering holder will be responsible for the payment of any
applicable transfer tax thereon.
Resale of the New Notes
Under existing interpretations of the staff of the SEC contained in
several no-action letters to third parties, the new notes would in general be
freely transferable after the exchange offer without further registration under
the Securities Act. The relevant no-action letters include the Exxon Capital
Holdings Corporation letter, which was made available by the SEC on May 13,
1988, and the Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated letter, made available on June
5, 1991.
However, any purchaser of old notes who is an "affiliate" of IPALCO or who
intends to participate in the exchange offer for the purpose of distributing
the new notes
(1) will not be able to rely on the interpretation of the staff of the
SEC,
(2) will not be able to tender its old notes in the exchange offer and
(3) must comply with the registration and prospectus delivery
requirements of the Securities Act in connection with any sale or
transfer of the notes unless that sale or transfer is made using an
exemption from those requirements.
By executing, or otherwise becoming bound by, the Letter of Transmittal
each holder of the old notes will represent that:
(1) it is not our "affiliate";
(2) any new notes to be received by it were acquired in the ordinary
course of its business; and
(3) it has no arrangement or understanding with any person to
participate, and is not engaged in and does not intend to engage, in
the "distribution," within the meaning of the Securities Act, of the
new notes.
In addition, in connection with any resales of new notes, any broker-dealer
participating in the exchange offer who acquired notes for its own account as a
result of market-making or other trading activities must deliver a prospectus
meeting the requirements of the Securities Act. The SEC has taken the position
in the Shearman & Sterling no- action letter, which it made available on July
2, 1993, that participating broker-dealers may fulfill their prospectus
delivery requirements with respect to the new notes, other than a resale of an
unsold allotment from the original sale of the old notes, with the prospectus
contained in the exchange offer registration statement. Under the registration
rights agreement, we are required to allow participating broker-dealers and
other persons, if any, subject to similar prospectus delivery requirements to
use this prospectus as it may be amended or supplemented from time to time, in
connection with the resale of new notes.
80
UNITED STATES TAX CONSEQUENCES OF THE EXCHANGE OFFER
The exchange of old notes for new notes in the exchange offer will not
result in any United States federal income tax consequences to holders. When a
holder exchanges an old note for a new note in the exchange offer, the holder
will have the same adjusted basis and holding period in the new note as in the
old note immediately before the exchange.
PLAN OF DISTRIBUTION
Each broker-dealer that receives new notes for its own account in the
exchange offer must acknowledge that it will deliver a prospectus in connection
with any resale of new notes. This prospectus, as it may be amended or
supplemented from time to time, may be used by a broker-dealer in connection
with resales of new notes received in exchange for old notes where old notes
were acquired as a result of market-making activities or other trading
activities. We have agreed that, for a period of 180 days after the expiration
date, we will make this prospectus, as amended or supplemented, available to
any broker-dealer for use in connection with any resale of new notes received
by it in exchange for old notes.
We will not receive any proceeds from any sale of new notes by
broker-dealers.
New notes received by broker-dealers for their own account in the exchange
offer may be sold from time to time in one or more transactions
o in the over-the-counter market
o in negotiated transactions
o through the writing of options on the new notes or
o a combination of those methods of resale at market prices prevailing
at the time of resale, at prices related to prevailing market prices
or negotiated prices.
Any resale may be made
o directly to purchasers or
o to or through brokers or dealers who may receive compensation in the
form of commissions or concessions from any broker-dealer or the
purchasers of any new notes.
Any broker-dealer that resells new notes that were received by it for its
own account in the exchange offer and any broker or dealer that participates in
a distribution of those new notes may be considered to be an "underwriter"
within the meaning of the Securities Act. Any profit on any resale of those new
notes and any commission or concessions received by any of those persons may be
considered to be underwriting compensation under the Securities Act. The letter
of transmittal states that, by acknowledging that it will deliver and by
delivering a prospectus, a broker-dealer will not be considered to admit that
it is an "underwriter" within the meaning of the Securities Act.
For a period of 180 days after the expiration date, we will promptly send
additional copies of this prospectus and any amendment or supplement to this
prospectus to any broker-dealer that requests those documents in the letter of
transmittal. We have agreed to pay all expenses incident to the exchange offer,
including the expenses of one counsel for the holders of the notes, other than
commissions or concessions of any brokers or dealers and will indemnify the
holders of the notes, including any broker-dealers, against some liabilities,
including liabilities under the Securities Act.
81
LEGAL MATTERS
The validity of the issuance of the new notes in the exchange offer will
be passed upon for us by Davis Polk & Wardwell.
EXPERTS
The consolidated financial statements of IPALCO Enterprises, Inc. and
subsidiaries and the financial statements of Indianapolis Power & Light Company
included in this prospectus and the related financial statement schedules
included elsewhere in the registration statement have been audited by Deloitte &
Touche LLP, independent auditors, as stated in their reports appearing herein
and elsewhere in the registration statement, and are included in reliance upon
the reports of such firm given upon their authority as experts in accounting and
auditing.
WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION
We have filed with the SEC, Washington, D.C. 20549, a registration
statement on Form S-4 under the Securities Act with respect to our offering of
the new notes. This prospectus does not contain all of the information included
in the registration statement and the exhibits and schedules thereto. You will
find additional information about us and the new notes in the registration
statement. Certain items are omitted in accordance with the rules and
regulations of the SEC. For further information with respect to the company and
the new notes, reference is made to the registration statement and the exhibits
and any schedules filed therewith. Statements contained in this prospectus as
to the contents of any contract or other document referred to are not
necessarily complete and in each instance, if such contract or document is
filed as an exhibit, reference is made to the copy of such contract or other
document filed as an exhibit to the registration statement, each statement
being qualified in all respects by such reference. A copy of the registration
statement, including the exhibits and schedules thereto, may be read and copied
at the SEC's Public Reference Room at 450 Fifth Street, N.W., Washington, D.C.
20549. Information on the operation of the Public Reference Room may be
obtained by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. In addition, the SEC maintains
an Internet site at http://www.sec.gov, from which interested persons can
electronically access the registration statement, including the exhibits and
any schedules thereto.
If for any reason we are not required to comply with the reporting
requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, we are still
required under the indenture to furnish the holders of the new notes with the
information, documents and other reports specified in Sections 13 and 15(d) of
the Exchange Act. In addition, we have agreed that, for so long as any notes
remain outstanding, we will furnish to the holders of the notes and to
securities analysts and prospective investors, upon their request, the
information required to be delivered by Rule 144A(d)(4) under the Securities
Act.. We also maintain an Internet site at http://www.ipalco.com. Our website
and the information contained therein or connected thereto shall not be deemed
to be incorporated into this prospectus or the registration statement of which
it forms a part.
82
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
[Enlarge/Download Table]
Page
----
IPALCO Enterprises, Inc. and Subsidiaries -- Consolidated Financial Statements
Independent Auditors' Report..................................................................... F-2
Consolidated Statements of Income for the years ended December 31, 2001, 2000 and 1999........... F-3
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2001 and 2000..................................... F-4
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2001, 2000 and 1999....... F-6
Consolidated Statements of Common Shareholder's Equity for the years ended December 31, 2001,
2000 and 1999................................................................................. F-7
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements....................................................... F-8
Indianapolis Power & Light Company - Financial Statements
Independent Auditors' Report..................................................................... F-28
Statements of Income for the years ended December 31, 2001, 2000 and 1999........................ F-29
Balance sheets as of December 31, 2001 and 2000.................................................. F-30
Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2001, 2000 and 1999.................... F-32
Statements of Retained Earnings for the years ended December 31, 2001, 2000 and 1999............. F-33
Notes to Financial Statements.................................................................... F-34
F-1
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
To the Shareholder and Board of Directors of IPALCO ENTERPRISES, INC.:
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of IPALCO
Enterprises, Inc. and its subsidiaries (the "Company") as of December 31, 2001
and 2000, and the related consolidated statements of income, common
shareholder's equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period
ended December 31, 2001. Our audits also included the financial statement
schedule listed in the Index at Item 21. These financial statements and
financial statement schedule are the responsibility of the Company's management.
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and
financial statement schedule based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally
accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan
and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the
financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes
examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting
principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as
evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our
audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of IPALCO Enterprises, Inc. and
its subsidiaries as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the results of their
operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended
December 31, 2001 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted
in the United States of America. Also in our opinion, such financial statement
schedule, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial
statements taken as a whole, present fairly in all material respects the
information set forth therein.
/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Indianapolis, Indiana
January 18, 2002
(March 29, 2002 as to Note 18)
F-2
[Enlarge/Download Table]
IPALCO Enterprises, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Statements of Consolidated Income
For the Years Ended December 31, 2001, 2000 and 1999
2001 2000 1999
---------------------------------------
(In Thousands Except Per Share Amounts)
UTILITY OPERATING REVENUES:
Electric.................................................. $828,046 $830,955 $800,337
Steam..................................................... -- 27,580 34,315
-------- -------- --------
Total operating revenues............................... 828,046 858,535 834,652
-------- -------- --------
UTILITY OPERATING EXPENSES:
Operation:
Fuel................................................... 182,471 190,703 173,872
Other.................................................. 127,978 154,476 137,348
Power purchased........................................... 16,932 13,206 29,769
Purchased steam........................................... -- 5,259 6,391
Maintenance............................................... 86,356 79,437 77,637
Voluntary early retirement program benefit costs.......... 23,751 62,007 --
Termination benefit agreement costs....................... 54,540 -- --
Depreciation and amortization............................. 110,772 111,045 107,469
Taxes other than income taxes............................. 35,601 37,348 34,190
Income taxes -- net....................................... 59,004 68,831 84,475
-------- -------- --------
Total operating expenses............................... 697,405 722,312 651,151
-------- -------- --------
UTILITY OPERATING INCOME..................................... 130,641 136,223 183,501
-------- -------- --------
OTHER INCOME AND (DEDUCTIONS):
Allowance for equity funds used during construction....... 1,341 2,073 1,372
Other -- net.............................................. (4,765) (5,415) 3,454
Gain on sale of thermal assets............................ -- 30,583 --
Gain on sale of available for sale securities............. -- 102,267 --
Termination benefit agreement costs....................... (4,669) -- --
Merger costs.............................................. (6,283) (5,783) --
Income taxes -- net....................................... 14,388 (44,823) 5,688
-------- -------- --------
Total other income-- net............................... 12 78,902 10,514
-------- -------- --------
INCOME BEFORE INTEREST AND OTHER CHARGES..................... 130,653 215,125 194,015
-------- -------- --------
INTEREST AND OTHER CHARGES:
Interest on long-term debt................................ 46,326 50,173 58,584
Other interest............................................ 1,446 1,717 1,545
Allowance for borrowed funds used during construction..... (633) (961) (829)
Amortization of redemption premiums and expenses on debt
-- net.................................................. 2,354 2,141 2,555
Preferred stock transactions.............................. 3,213 3,213 3,213
-------- -------- --------
Total interest and other charges -- net................ 52,706 56,283 65,068
-------- -------- --------
INCOME BEFORE EXTRAORDINARY ITEM............................. 77,947 158,842 128,947
-------- -------- --------
Extraordinary Loss on Early Retirement of Debt - Net of Taxes -- (4,259) --
-------- -------- --------
NET INCOME................................................... 77,947 154,583 128,947
-------- -------- --------
BASIC EARNINGS PER SHARE:
Income Before Extraordinary Item............................. $ -- $ 1.84 $ 1.50
Extraordinary Loss on Early Retirement of Debt............... -- (0.05) --
-------- -------- --------
NET INCOME................................................... $ -- $ 1.79 $ 1.50
======== ======== ========
DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE:
Income Before Extraordinary Item............................. $ -- $ 1.82 $ 1.49
Extraordinary Loss on Early Retirement of Debt............... -- (0.05) --
-------- -------- --------
NET INCOME................................................... $ -- $ 1.77 $ 1.49
======== ======== ========
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-3
IPALCO ENTERPRISES, INC. and SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Balance Sheets
December 31, 2001 and 2000
[Enlarge/Download Table]
2001 2000
---------- ----------
(in Thousands)
ASSETS
UTILITY PLANT:
Utility plant in service.....................................................$2,942,190 $2,897,399
Less accumulated depreciation................................................ 1,443,736 1,344,403
---------- ----------
Utility plant in service - net............................................ 1,498,454 1,552,996
Construction work in progress................................................ 156,522 84,146
Property held for future use................................................. 10,741 10,692
---------- ----------
Utility plant - net....................................................... 1,665,717 1,647,834
---------- ----------
OTHER ASSETS:
Nonutility property.......................................................... 2,474 15,229
Less accumulated depreciation................................................ 732 2,851
Nonutility property - net................................................. 1,742 12,378
Available for sale securities................................................ 6 17
Other investments............................................................ 52,898 9,360
---------- ----------
Other assets - net........................................................ 54,646 21,755
---------- ----------
CURRENT ASSETS:
Cash and cash equivalents.................................................... 28,933 68,652
Accounts receivable and unbilled revenue (less allowance for doubtful
accounts - 2001, $1,095,000, and 2000, $1,794,000)........................ 48,001 66,565
Fuel - at average cost....................................................... 28,970 23,648
Materials and supplies - at average cost..................................... 48,376 48,791
Prepayments and other current assets......................................... 1,283 1,985
---------- ----------
Total current assets...................................................... 155,563 209,641
---------- ----------
DEFERRED DEBITS:
Regulatory assets............................................................ 97,809 92,826
Miscellaneous................................................................ 22,195 11,220
---------- ----------
Total deferred debits..................................................... 120,004 104,046
---------- ----------
TOTAL.....................................................................$1,995,930 $1,983,276
========== ==========
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-4
IPALCO ENTERPRISES, INC. and SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Balance Sheets
December 31, 2001 and 2000
[Enlarge/Download Table]
2001 2000
---------- ----------
(In Thousands)
CAPITALIZATION AND LIABILITIES
CAPITALIZATION:
Common shareholder's equity:
Common stock, no par, authorized - 290,000,000 shares, 116,773,825
issued and 88,863,423 outstanding in 2000...............................$ -- $ 449,987
Premium on 4% cumulative preferred stock.................................. 649 649
Retained earnings......................................................... 15,049 788,441
Accumulated other comprehensive income.................................... (11,469) (1,813)
Treasury stock, at cost - 27,910,402 shares in 2000 -- (507,116)
---------- ----------
Total common shareholder's equity....................................... 4,229 730,148
Cumulative preferred stock of subsidiary..................................... 59,135 59,135
Long-term debt............................................................... 1,371,930 621,863
---------- ----------
Total capitalization.................................................... 1,435,294 1,411,146
---------- ----------
CURRENT LIABILITIES:
Current maturities and sinking fund requirements............................. 300 6,450
Accounts payable............................................................. 47,798 25,848
Accrued expenses............................................................. 16,285 32,331
Dividends payable............................................................ 910 15,364
Taxes accrued................................................................ 9,438 49,477
Interest accrued............................................................. 21,892 13,051
Other current liabilities.................................................... 19,897 14,444
---------- ----------
Total current liabilities............................................... 116,520 156,965
---------- ----------
DEFERRED CREDITS AND OTHER LONG-TERM LIABILITIES:
Deferred income taxes - net.................................................. 271,195 275,171
Unamortized investment tax credit............................................ 33,690 36,458
Accrued post-retirement benefits............................................. 9,504 5,237
Accrued pension benefits..................................................... 125,549 91,191
Miscellaneous................................................................ 4,178 7,108
---------- ----------
Total deferred credits and other long-term liabilities.................. 444,116 415,165
---------- ----------
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
TOTAL...................................................................$1,995,930 $1,983,276
========== ==========
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-5
IPALCO ENTERPRISES, INC. and SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Cash Flows
For the Years Ended December 31, 2001, 2000 and 1999
[Enlarge/Download Table]
2001 2000 1999
--------- --------- ---------
(In Thousands)
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATIONS:
Net income....................................................$ 77,947 $ 154,583 $ 128,947
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by
operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization................................. 110,501 114,582 110,297
Amortization of regulatory assets............................. 3,156 11,633 14,470
Gain from sale of available for sale securities............... -- (112,638) --
Gain from sale of thermal assets.............................. -- (30,583) --
Gain from sale of Cleveland assets............................ (523) -- --
Extraordinary loss on early retirement of debt................ -- 4,259 --
Deferred income taxes and investment tax credit adjustments
- net....................................................... (13,412) (56,929) 9,622
Allowance for funds used during construction.................. (1,974) (3,034) (2,201)
Provision for impairment of nonutility property............... -- 1,847 --
Change in certain assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable........................................ 18,564 (15,208) (11,655)
Fuel, materials and supplies............................... (4,907) 23,106 (12,939)
Accounts payable and accrued expenses...................... 5,904 1,381 (15,037)
Taxes accrued.............................................. (40,039) 25,299 1,514
Accrued pension benefits................................... 15,153 5,402 (10,935)
Provision for early retirement program benefit costs....... 23,751 62,007 --
Other - net................................................ (2,261) 1,198 1,705
--------- --------- ---------
Net cash provided by operating activities........................ 191,860 186,905 213,788
--------- --------- ---------
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING:
Construction expenditures - utility........................... (126,517) (75,712) (103,452)
Construction expenditures - nonutility........................ -- (438) (295)
Proceeds from sale of available for sale securities........... -- 113,833 --
Proceeds from sale of thermal assets.......................... -- 161,700 --
Proceeds from sale of Cleveland assets........................ 14,077 -- --
Investment in Combustion Turbine.............................. (42,487) -- --
Other......................................................... (1,296) 5,863 (8,594)
--------- --------- ---------
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities.............. (156,223) 205,246 (112,341)
--------- --------- ---------
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING:
Issuance of long-term debt.................................... 750,000 29,650 140,900
Retirement of long-term debt.................................. (6,150) (323,926) (127,830)
(Reacquired) and reissued common stock........................ 6,564 50,062 (88,482)
Short-term debt - net......................................... -- (57,578) 32,378
Common dividends paid......................................... (29,008) (54,965) (50,920)
Distributions to AES.......................................... (796,000) -- --
Issuance of common stock related to incentive compensation
plans....................................................... 1,764 9,026 9,014
Other......................................................... (2,526) 297 (1,647)
--------- --------- ---------
Net cash used in financing activities............................ (75,356) (347,434) (86,587)
--------- --------- ---------
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH
EQUIVALENTS................................................... (39,719) 44,717 14,860
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT BEGINNING OF YEAR................... 68,652 23,935 9,075
--------- --------- ---------
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF YEAR.........................$ 28,933 $ 68,652 $ 23,935
========= ========= =========
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information: Cash paid
during the year for:
Interest (net of amount capitalized).......................$ 39,253 $ 54,073 $ 60,454
========= ========= =========
Income taxes...............................................$ 59,388 $ 144,052 $ 66,577
========= ========= =========
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-6
IPALCO ENTERPRISES, INC. and SUBSIDIARIES
Statements of Consolidated Common Shareholder's Equity
For the Years Ended December 31, 2001, 2000 and 1999
[Enlarge/Download Table]
2001 2000 1999
--------- --------- ---------
(In Thousands Except Per Share Amounts)
Common Stock
Balance at beginning of the year.................................$ 449,987 $ 439,066 $ 435,300
Exercise of stock options........................................ 1,764 9,026 9,014
Restricted stock issues/adjustments.............................. 8,250 3,081 (3,205)
Restricted stock repurchased..................................... (215) (1,186) (2,043)
Adjustment for Pooling of Interests.............................. (459,786) -- --
--------- --------- ---------
Balance at end of the year....................................... -- 449,987 439,066
--------- --------- ---------
Unearned Compensation
Balance at beginning of the year................................. -- (1,979) (6,003)
Amortization of restricted stock................................. -- 5,060 819
Restricted stock issues/adjustments.............................. -- (3,081) 3,205
--------- --------- ---------
Balance at end of the year....................................... -- -- (1,979)
--------- --------- ---------
Premium on 4% Cumulative Preferred Stock
Balance at end of the year....................................... 649 649 649
--------- --------- ---------
Retained Earnings
Balance at beginning of the year................................. 788,441 690,455 612,941
Net income....................................................... 77,947 154,583 128,947
Cash dividends declared (2001 $.16 per share; 2000 - $.65 per
share; 1999 - $.60 per share.................................. (14,574) (56,540) (51,433)
Subsidiary capital stock expense................................. -- (57) --
Distributions to AES............................................. (796,000) -- --
Adjustment for pooling of interests.............................. (40,765) -- --
--------- --------- ---------
Balance at end of the year....................................... 15,049 788,441 690,455
--------- --------- ---------
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Balance at beginning of the year................................. (1,813) 106,733 --
Minimum pension liability adjustment............................. (12,923) (1,820) --
Realized gains on securities..................................... -- (69,101) --
Unrealized gains/(losses) on securities.......................... 3,267 (37,625) 106,733
--------- --------- ---------
Balance at end of the year....................................... (11,469) (1,813) 106,733
--------- --------- ---------
Treasury Stock
Balance at beginning of the year................................. (507,116) (557,178) (468,696)
Reissued stock (2001 - 8,354 shares; 2000 - 3,168,464 shares).... 6,564 50,062 --
Reacquired stock (1999-3,529,356 shares)......................... -- -- (88,482)
Adjustment for pooling of interests.............................. 500,552 -- --
--------- --------- ---------
Balance at end of the year....................................... -- (507,116) (557,178)
--------- --------- ---------
Total shareholder's equity at end of the year....................$ 4,229 $ 730,148 $ 677,746
========= ========= =========
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-7
IPALCO ENTERPRISES, INC. and SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
For the Years Ended December 31, 2001, 2000 and 1999
1. EXCHANGE AGREEMENT AND ASSET SALES
AES Acquisition: On March 27, 2001, The AES Corporation (AES) completed
its acquisition of IPALCO Enterprises, Inc. (IPALCO) through a share exchange
transaction in accordance with the Agreement and Plan of Share Exchange dated
as of July 15, 2000, among AES and IPALCO (the Share Exchange Agreement).
Pursuant to the Share Exchange Agreement, IPALCO became a wholly-owned
subsidiary of AES, accounted for as a pooling of interests.
At the effective time of the share exchange, each of the outstanding
89,685,177 shares of IPALCO common stock was converted into the right to
receive 0.463 of a share of AES common stock, for an aggregate purchase price
of $2.15 billion and $890 million in assumed debt and preferred stock.
Following the share exchange, AES owns all of the outstanding capital stock of
IPALCO. Treasury stock of $500.6 million was cancelled as a result of the
acquisition. Accordingly, the common stock balance was reduced by $459.8
million and the remaining $40.8 million was applied against retained earnings.
The transaction was subject to certain conditions, including receipt of
regulatory approvals, including that of the Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission and the Securities and Exchange Commission.
During 2001 and 2000, IPALCO expensed $6.3 million and $5.8 million of
merger related costs, respectively, which are included in OTHER INCOME AND
(DEDUCTIONS)-Other - net. Total merger related costs were $12.1 million.
As a result of the acquisition by AES, IPALCO has recorded $74.8 million
($46.4 million after tax) of costs related to the termination of certain
employees during 2001. The pretax expenses included $59.4 million in costs
associated with termination benefit agreements and severance, $9.2 million in
supplemental retirement costs, and $6.2 million in restricted stock expense.
Substantially all of the supplemental retirement costs and restricted stock
costs were paid out by March 31, 2001. Termination benefit agreement costs
include amounts paid to officers of IPALCO under termination benefit agreements
and severance paid to certain other employees upon termination during the first
half of 2001.
Sale of the Assets of the Steam Operations, Mid-America Energy Resources
and Indianapolis Campus Energy: On November 20, 2000, IPALCO sold certain
assets (the Thermal Assets) to Citizens Gas & Coke Utility. The Thermal Assets
included the Perry K Steam Plant and downtown steam distribution system (Steam)
operated by Indianapolis Power & Light Company (IPL); the central city chilled
water cooling and distribution system owned by Mid-America Energy Resources,
Inc. (MAER), and the chilled water cooling system owned by Indianapolis Campus
Energy, Inc. (ICE) that provides services to Eli Lilly & Company. The selling
price of the Thermal Assets was $161.7 million. The selling price allocated to
Steam, MAER and ICE was $54.7 million, $88.1 million and $18.9 million,
respectively. The transaction resulted in a gain to IPALCO, on a consolidated
basis, of $30.6 million ($18.7 million after tax). Of the net proceeds, $87.8
million was used to retire debt specifically assignable to the Thermal Assets.
Sale of Cleveland Energy Resources: On May 21, 2001, IPALCO sold the
assets of Cleveland Energy Resources (CER) to Dominion Cleveland Thermal, Inc.,
a subsidiary of Dominion Energy, Inc. CER includes two subsidiaries of
Mid-America Capital Resources, Inc. (Mid-America), Cleveland Thermal Energy
Corporation (Cleveland Thermal) and Cleveland District Cooling Corporation
(Cleveland Cooling). Cleveland Thermal owns and operates two steam plants in
Cleveland, Ohio. Cleveland Cooling owns and operates a district cooling
facility located near downtown Cleveland, which distributes chilled water to
subscribers located downtown for their air conditioning needs. The selling
price for the assets was $14.6 million. The completion of the transaction had
no significant income statement impact. In the fourth quarter of 2000, IPALCO
recorded, in OTHER INCOME AND
F-8
(DEDUCTIONS)--Other--net, an impairment provision of $1.8 million ($1.2 million
after tax) on the carrying amounts of the CER assets.
2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Principles of Consolidation: IPALCO owns all of the outstanding common
stock of its subsidiaries (collectively referred to as Enterprises). The
consolidated financial statements include the accounts of IPALCO, its regulated
utility subsidiary, IPL, and its unregulated subsidiary, Mid-America.
Mid-America conducts its businesses through various wholly owned subsidiaries,
including MAER, ICE, Cleveland Thermal and Cleveland Cooling. All significant
intercompany items have been eliminated in consolidation.
The operating components of all subsidiaries other than IPL are included
under the captions OTHER INCOME AND (DEDUCTIONS), "Other--net" and "Income
taxes--net" and INTEREST AND OTHER CHARGES, "Interest on long-term debt,"
"Other Interest" and "Amortization of redemption premiums and expenses on
debt-net" in the Statements of Consolidated Income.
Nature of Operations: IPL is engaged principally in providing electric and
steam service (through November 20, 2000--see Note 1) to the Indianapolis
metropolitan area. Mid-America operates energy-related businesses in Cleveland,
Ohio and maintained operations in Indianapolis, Indiana through November 20,
2000 (see Note 1).
Concentrations of Risk: Substantially all of Enterprises' business
activity is with customers located within the Indianapolis area. In addition,
approximately 69% of Enterprises' employees are covered by collective
bargaining agreements.
Regulation: The retail utility operations of IPL are subject to the
jurisdiction of the Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission (IURC). IPL's
wholesale power transactions are subject to the jurisdiction of the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission. These agencies regulate IPL's utility business
operations, tariffs, accounting, depreciation allowances, services, security
issues and the sale and acquisition of utility properties. The financial
statements of IPL are based on generally accepted accounting principles in the
United States of America, including the provisions of Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 71, "Accounting for the Effects of Certain Types of
Regulation," which gives recognition to the ratemaking and accounting practices
of these agencies.
Revenues: Revenues are recognized as services are provided including those
unbilled at the end of each month.
A fuel adjustment charge provision, which is established after public
hearing, is applicable to most of the rate schedules of IPL and permits the
billing or crediting of estimated fuel costs above or below the levels included
in such rate schedules. Actual fuel costs in excess of or under estimated fuel
costs billed are deferred or accrued, respectively.
IPL is allowed to recover purchased power costs based on a benchmark. If
the cost per Mwh of power purchases is not greater than the benchmark, then the
purchased power costs should be considered net energy costs that are presumed
fuel costs included in purchased power. If the average cost per Mwh of power
purchases is greater than the benchmark, then the costs are recoverable only
through demonstration of the reasonableness of those purchases to the IURC.
Authorized Annual Operating Income: Indiana law requires electric
utilities under the jurisdiction of the IURC to meet operating expense and
income requirements as a condition for approval of requested changes in fuel
adjustment charges. Additionally, customer refunds may result if the utilities'
rolling 12-month operating income, determined at quarterly measurement dates,
exceeds the utilities' authorized annual operating income and cannot be offset
by applicable cumulative net operating income deficiencies. In such a
circumstance, the required customer refund for the quarterly measurement period
is calculated to be one-fourth of the excess annual operating income grossed up
for federal and state taxes as required under I. C. 8-1-2-42.5.
F-9
IPL's authorized annual jurisdictional electric net operating income, for
purposes of quarterly operating income tests, is $163 million. This level will
be maintained until changed by an IURC order. During 2001, the Commission found
that IPL's rolling annual jurisdictional retail electric operating income was
less than the authorized annual operating income at each of the quarterly
measurement dates (January, April, July and October). At October 31, 2001,
IPL's most recent quarterly measurement date, IPL had a cumulative net
operating deficiency of $621.0 million. The operating deficiency is calculated
by summing the quarterly measurement period annual results from the date of the
last rate order. As a consequence, IPL could, for a period of time, earn above
$163 million of electric jurisdictional retail net operating income without
being required to make a customer refund.
Through the date of IPL's next general electric rate order, IPL is
required to file upward and downward adjustments in fuel cost credits and
charges on a quarterly basis, based on changes in the cost of fuel,
irrespective of its level of earnings.
Allowance For Funds Used During Construction: In accordance with the
prescribed uniform system of accounts, IPL capitalizes an allowance for the net
cost of funds (interest on borrowed funds and a reasonable rate on equity
funds) used for construction purposes during the period of construction with a
corresponding credit to income. IPL capitalized amounts using pretax composite
rates of 9.4%, 9.2% and 9.4% during 2001, 2000 and 1999, respectively.
Utility Plant and Depreciation: Utility plant is stated at original cost
as defined for regulatory purposes. The cost of additions to utility plant and
replacements of retirement units of property, as distinct from renewals of
minor items that are charged to maintenance, are charged to plant accounts.
Units of property replaced or abandoned in the ordinary course of business are
retired from the plant accounts at cost; such amounts plus removal costs, less
salvage, are charged to accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is computed by
the straight-line method based on functional rates approved by the IURC and
averaged 3.6% during 2001 and 2000 and 3.5% during 1999.
Nonutility property is recorded at cost, and depreciation is calculated
using the straight-line method over the estimated service lives of the related
property (see Note 3). Nonutility depreciation expense was $0.2 million, $3.0
million and $3.3 million for 2001, 2000 and 1999, respectively.
Sale of Accounts Receivable: IPL has sold, on a revolving basis, an
undivided percentage interest in $50 million of its accounts receivable.
Regulatory Assets: Regulatory assets represent deferred costs that have
been included as allowable costs for ratemaking purposes. IPL has recorded
regulatory assets relating to certain costs as authorized by the IURC. Specific
regulatory assets are disclosed in Note 5. As of December 31, 2001, all
regulatory assets have been included as allowable costs in orders of the IURC
(see Note 11). IPL is amortizing such nontax-related regulatory assets to
expense over periods ranging from 1 to 30 years. Tax-related regulatory assets
represent the net income tax costs to be considered in future regulatory
proceedings generally as the tax-related amounts are paid.
In accordance with regulatory treatment, IPL deferred as a regulatory asset
certain post in-service date carrying charges and certain other costs related to
its investment in Unit 4 at the Petersburg Plant ("Petersburg Unit 4"). As
authorized in the 1995 Electric Rate Settlement, IPL, effective September 1,
1995, is amortizing this deferral to expense over a life that generally
approximates the useful life of the related facility. Also in accordance with
regulatory treatment, IPL defers as regulatory assets non-sinking fund debt and
preferred stock redemption premiums and expenses, and amortizes such costs over
the life of the original debt or, in the case of preferred stock redemption
premiums, over 20 years.
Derivatives: Enterprises has only limited involvement with derivative
financial instruments and does not use them for trading purposes. Enterprises
entered into interest rate swap agreements as a means of managing the interest
rate exposure on certain of its debt facilities. Prior to the adoption of
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 133 these interest rate swaps
were accounted for under the accrual method. Under this method, the
differential to be paid or received on the interest rate swap agreement is
recognized over the life of the agreement in interest expense. Changes in
market value of interest swaps accounted for under the accrual method are not
reflected in the accompanying financial statements.
F-10
Income Taxes: Deferred taxes are provided for all significant temporary
differences between book and taxable income. The effects of income taxes are
measured based on enacted laws and rates. Such differences include the use of
accelerated depreciation methods for tax purposes, the use of different book
and tax depreciable lives, rates and in-service dates and the accelerated tax
amortization of pollution control facilities. Deferred tax assets and
liabilities are recognized for the expected future tax consequences of existing
differences between the financial reporting and tax reporting basis of assets
and liabilities. IPL has recorded as regulatory assets and net deferred tax
liabilities, income taxes payable and includable in allowable costs for
ratemaking purposes in future years. Investment tax credits that reduced
federal income taxes in the years they arose have been deferred and are being
amortized to income over the useful lives of the properties in accordance with
regulatory treatment.
Cash and Cash Equivalents: Enterprises considers all highly liquid
investments purchased with original maturities of 90 days or less to be cash
equivalents.
Investments: Securities that Enterprises does not intend to hold until
maturity are classified as available-for- sale, and any unrealized gains or
losses are recorded as a separate component of shareholder's equity. Other
investments at December 31, 2001 includes a combustion turbine in the amount of
$42.6 million.
Comprehensive Income: Comprehensive income was $68.3 million, $46.0
million and $235.7 million for the years ended December 31, 2001, 2000 and
1999, respectively, and was composed of net income, changes in unrealized gain
in securities available for sale and minimum pension liability adjustments.
Employee Benefit Plans: Substantially all employees of IPALCO and IPL are
covered by a defined benefit pension plan, defined contribution plans and a
group benefits plan.
The defined benefit pension plan is noncontributory and is funded through
a trust. Benefits are based on each individual employee's years of service.
Benefit accrual was frozen for all non-union participants effective July 8,
2001. Enterprises' funding policy is to contribute annually not less than the
minimum required by applicable law, nor more than the maximum amount that can
be deducted for federal income tax purposes. Additionally, a select group of
former management employees of IPALCO and IPL who have terminated vested
benefits are covered under a funded supplemental retirement plan.
The Employees' Thrift Plan of Indianapolis Power & Light Company (Thrift
Plan) is a defined contribution plan sponsored by IPL. Employees elect to make
contributions to the Thrift Plan based on a percentage of their annual base
compensation. Each employee's contribution is matched in amounts up to, but not
exceeding, 4% of the employee's annual base compensation. Employer
contributions to the Thrift Plan were $2.8 million, $3.5 million and $3.5
million for 2001, 2000 and 1999, respectively. As of July 8, 2001 no new
contributions to this plan have accrued or will accrue and participation in
this plan has been frozen with respect to any employee whose terms of
employment are not governed by a collective bargaining agreement.
The group benefits plan is sponsored by IPL and provides certain health
care and life insurance benefits to active employees and employees who retire
from active service on or after attaining age 55 and have rendered at least 10
years of service. The post-retirement benefit costs of this plan were funded
through a Voluntary Employee Beneficiary Association (VEBA) Trust. Effective
October 20, 2000, IPL curtailed and settled for $7.5 million the
post-retirement medical and life insurance benefit portion of its overall group
benefits plan where upon, the assets of the VEBA trust were spun-off to an
independent trustee. On April 30, 2001, all assets of the VEBA trust and its
obligations were formally transferred to a newly formed plan, the Voluntary
Employee Beneficiary Association Plan (the "VEBA Plan") that provides post
retirement medical and life benefits to retirees who were employed by IPL
before March 27, 2001. The VEBA Plan is sponsored and administered by the VEBA
Commitee.
A defined contribution plan is sponsored by Enterprises as the Mid-America
Energy Resources Employee Retirement Plan. This plan is in the process of being
terminated. There are no active contributions being made to the plan.
F-11
New Accounting Pronouncement: Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 133, "Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities" (SFAS
133), requires that an entity recognize all derivatives as either assets or
liabilities on the balance sheet and measure these instruments at fair value.
The Company adopted SFAS 133 on January 1, 2001. The Company designated an
interest rate swap as a cash flow hedge which is recorded as a liability on the
balance sheet and measured at fair value. The effect of adopting SFAS 133
resulted in a decrease to comprehensive income of approximately $2.0 million.
There was no income statement impact as the hedge was determined by management
to be highly effective in accordance with SFAS 133.
In July 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued
SFAS No. 141, "Business Combinations," SFAS No. 142, "Goodwill and Other
Intangible Assets" and SFAS No. 143, "Accounting for Asset Retirement
Obligations". SFAS No. 141 requires business combinations initiated after June
30, 2001, to be accounted for using the purchase method of accounting and
broadens the criteria for recording intangible assets separate from goodwill.
SFAS No. 141 also prohibits the use of pooling-of-interests method for all
business combinations initiated after June 30, 2001.
SFAS No. 142 requires the use of a nonamortization approach to account for
purchased goodwill and certain intangibles. Under a no amortization approach,
goodwill and certain intangibles would not be amortized into results of
operations, but instead would be reviewed for impairment at least annually and
written down and charged to results of operations in the periods in which the
recorded value of goodwill and certain intangibles are determined to be greater
than their fair value. SFAS No. 142 is effective for fiscal years beginning
after December 15, 2001. We do not believe the adoption of SFAS No. 142 will
have any impact on our consolidated financial position or results of operations.
SFAS No. 143 addresses financial accounting and reporting for obligations
associated with retirement of tangible long-lived assets and the associated
asset retirement costs. It requires that the fair value of a liability for an
asset retirement obligation be recognized in the period in which it is incurred
if a reasonable estimate of fair value can be made. The associated asset
retirement costs are capitalized as part of the carrying amount of the
long-lived asset. This statement is effective for fiscal years beginning after
June 15, 2002. We have not determined the impact, if any, that this statement
will have on our consolidated financial position or results of operations.
SFAS No. 144, "Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived
Assets," was issued in August 2001 and addresses accounting for and reporting
of the impairment or disposal of long-lived assets. SFAS No. 144 is effective
for fiscal years beginning after December 31, 2001. We do not believe the
adoption of SFAS No. 144 will have any impact on the consolidated financial
position or results of operations.
Use of Management Estimates: The preparation of financial statements in
conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires that
management make certain estimates and assumptions that affect the reported
amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and
liabilities at the date of the financial statements. The reported amounts of
revenues and expenses during the reporting period may also be affected by the
estimates and assumptions management is required to make. Actual results may
differ from those estimates. During 1999, IPL changed its estimate for unbilled
revenue, which resulted in a $8.0 million increase to unbilled revenue.
Earnings per Share: All references to earnings per share in the Notes to
the Consolidated Financial Statements represent diluted earnings per share.
Reclassifications: Certain amounts from prior years' consolidated
financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the current year
presentation.
F-12
3. PLANT IN SERVICE AND OTHER PROPERTY
Utility Plant in Service
The original cost of utility plant in service at December 31, segregated
by functional classifications, follows:
2001 2000
---------- ----------
(In Thousands)
Production........................................$1,753,340 $1,722,363
Transmission...................................... 243,422 241,103
Distribution...................................... 792,511 783,618
General........................................... 152,917 150,315
---------- ----------
Total utility plant in service.................$2,942,190 $2,897,399
========== ==========
Substantially all of IPL's property is subject to the lien of the
indenture securing IPL's First Mortgage Bonds.
Nonutility Property
The original cost of nonutility property at December 31 follows:
2001 2000
---------- ----------
(In Thousands)
District Cooling..................................$ -- $ 4,868
District Heating.................................. -- 7,288
General........................................... 2,474 3,073
---------- ----------
Total nonutility property......................$ 2,474 $ 15,229
========== ==========
On November 20, 2000, Enterprises sold the assets of the IPL steam
operations, MAER and ICE to Citizens Gas & Coke Utility (see Note 1). On May
21, 2001, Enterprises sold the assets of CER to Dominion Cleveland Thermal,
Inc., a subsidiary of Dominion Energy, Inc. (see Note 1).
4. DISCLOSURES ABOUT FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
The estimated fair value of financial instruments has been determined by
Enterprises using available market information and appropriate valuation
methodologies. However, considerable judgment is required in interpreting
market data to develop the estimates of fair value. Accordingly, the estimates
presented herein are not necessarily indicative of the amounts that Enterprises
could realize in a current market exchange. The use of different market
assumptions and/or estimation methodologies may have a material effect on the
estimated fair value amounts.
Cash and Cash Equivalents and Notes Payable: The carrying amount
approximates fair value due to the short maturity of these instruments.
Available-For-Sale Securities: These securities are carried at fair value
based on the quoted market price at the end of the reporting period.
Long-Term Debt, Including Current Maturities and Sinking Fund
Requirements: Interest rates that are currently available to Enterprises for
issuance of debt with similar terms and remaining maturities are used to
estimate fair value. The variable rate debt has been included at the face
amount for both carrying amount and fair value. The fair values of the interest
rate swap agreements of Enterprises have been estimated to be $(3.7) million
and $(3.1) million at December 31, 2001 and 2000, respectively. These amounts
represent what Enterprises would either pay or receive to enter into equivalent
agreements with a swap counterparty. The fair value of the debt outstanding has
been determined on the basis of the specific securities issued and outstanding.
Accordingly, the purpose of this disclosure is not to approximate the value on
the basis of how the debt might be refinanced. At
F-13
December 31, 2001, and 2000, the consolidated carrying amount of Enterprises'
long-term debt, including current maturities and sinking fund requirements, and
the approximate fair value are as follows:
2001 2000
---------- ----------
(In Thousands)
Carrying amount...................................$1,372,230 $ 628,313
Approximate fair value............................ 1,396,737 635,720
5. REGULATORY ASSETS
The amounts of regulatory assets at December 31 are as follows:
2001 2000
---------- ----------
(In Thousands)
Related to deferred taxes (Note 2)................$ 52,033 $ 45,435
Unamortized reacquisition premium on debt
(Note 2)........................................ 19,666 20,091
Unamortized Petersburg Unit 4 carrying charges and
certain other costs (Note 2).................... 26,010 27,065
Demand side management costs (Note 11)............ 100 235
---------- ----------
Total regulatory assets...........................$ 97,809 $ 92,826
========== ==========
6. CAPITAL STOCK
Stock Repurchases: During 1999, IPALCO repurchased 3.4 million shares at a
cost of $88.4 million.
Stock Split: On February 23, 1999, the IPALCO Board of Directors
authorized a two-for-one split of IPALCO's common stock, payable to
stockholders of record on March 5, 1999. All outstanding share, per share and
stock option data in all periods have been restated to reflect the split.
Common Stock: IPALCO has a Rights Agreement, amended and restated as of
April 28, 1998, that is designed to protect IPALCO's shareholders against
unsolicited attempts to acquire control of IPALCO that do not offer what the
Board believes is a fair and adequate price to all shareholders. The Board
declared a dividend of one Right for each share of common stock to shareholders
of record on July 11, 1990. The Rights will expire at the time of redemption or
exchange, or on April 28, 2008, whichever occurs earliest. At this time, the
Rights are attached to and trade with the common stock. The Rights are not
taxable to shareholders or to IPALCO, and they do not affect reported earnings
per share. Under the Rights Agreement, IPALCO has authorized and reserved 120
million shares for issuance. The Board of Directors amended the Rights
Agreement effective July 14, 2000, to provide that it is not triggered by the
Share Exchange Agreement with AES (see Note 1).
The following is a reconciliation of the weighted average common shares
for the basic and diluted earnings per share computations:
For the Year Ended
December 31,
-------------------------------
2001 2000 1999
-------- -------- --------
(In Thousands)
Weighted average common shares........ -- 86,554 86,096
Dilutive effect of stock options...... -- 705 695
-------- -------- --------
Weighted average common and
incremental shares.................. -- 87,259 86,791
======== ======== ========
IPALCO PowerInvest, IPALCO's Dividend Reinvestment and Direct Stock
Purchase Plan, allowed participants to purchase shares of common stock and to
reinvest dividends. The plan provided that such shares could be
F-14
purchased on the open market or directly from IPALCO at the option of IPALCO.
All purchases in 2000 were made on the open market. PowerInvest was terminated
following payment of the quarterly dividend on January 15, 2001.
Under the Thrift Plan, shares may be purchased either on the open market
or, if available, as original issue shares directly from AES. All purchases in
2001 prior to acquisition by AES were made on the open market; thereafter, all
purchases were made at original issue.
Effective July 2, 2001, all non-union employees were moved from the IPL
Thrift Plan to the AES Profit Sharing and Stock Ownership Plan for active
contributions. The assets will be moved in the first half of 2002. Under the
AES Profit Sharing and Stock Ownership Plan, shares are available as original
issue shares directly from AES.
IPALCO has the following plans under which options to acquire shares of
common stock may be granted: the 1990 Stock Option Plan for key employees; the
1991 Directors' Stock Option Plan for non-employee directors; and the 1997
Stock Option Plan for officers and other key employees. In addition, the 1999
Stock Incentive Plan provides for the issuance of options and restricted stock
awards to key employees and consultants.
All IPALCO stock options outstanding were converted to AES stock options
in conjunction with IPALCO's acquisition by AES on March 27, 2001 and in
accordance with the conversion formula set forth in the Agreement and Plan of
Share Exchange. No additional grants will be made under the IPALCO option
plans.
A summary of options issued under all plans is as follows:
Weighted Average Range of Option Number
Price per Share Price per Share of Shares
---------------- --------------- ---------
Outstanding, December 31, 1998..... 14.80 8.416 - 21.67 2,618,298
Granted............................ 19.23 16.63 - 23.38 187,000
Exercised.......................... 14.69 8.416 - 20.345 (455,318)
----------
Outstanding, December 31, 1999..... 15.17 8.416 - 23.38 2,349,980
Granted............................ 16.57 16.41 - 20.53 2,033,000
Canceled........................... 21.03 21.03 - 21.03 (5,000)
Exercised.......................... 15.74 8.416 - 23.38 (3,167,954)
----------
Outstanding, December 31, 2000..... 16.01 10.46 - 23.38 1,210,026
Granted............................ 0 0 0
Canceled........................... 10.48 10.48 - 10.48 (6,000)
Exercised.......................... 14.16 10.46 - 23.38 (463,400)
----------
Outstanding, March 26, 2001........ 17.21 10.46 - 23.38 740,626
----------
Options converted to shares of AES. 37.17 22.59 - 50.50 342,910
Outstanding, December 31, 2001 .... 0 0 0
The number of shares exercisable at December 31, 2000 and 1999 were:
1,195,026 and 2,309,980, respectively, with a weighted average exercise price
of $15.95 and $15.06, respectively. The weighted average remaining contractual
life of the options outstanding at December 31, 2000 and 1999 was 8.1 years and
6.5 years, respectively.
IPALCO has issued restricted common stock under various incentive
compensation plans. The 1999 Plan, the Long-term Performance and Restricted
Stock Incentive Plan (1998 Plan) and the Long-term Performance and Restricted
Stock Incentive Plan (1995 Plan) each provide for the issuance of restricted
shares of IPALCO common stock to plan participants. Generally, under each plan,
shares of restricted common stock with value equal to a stated percentage of
participants' base salary are initially awarded at the beginning of a
three-year performance period, subject to adjustment to reflect the
participants' actual base salary. The shares remain restricted and
nontransferable throughout each three-year performance period, vesting in
one-third increments in each of the three years following the end of the
performance period. At the end of a performance period, awards are subject to
adjustment to reflect
F-15
Enterprises' performance compared to peer companies. Final awards under the
plans can range from zero up to 400% of the initial awards. Vested shares are
no longer restricted and may be held or sold by the participant.
A summary of restricted common stock issued under all plans is as follows:
[Download Table]
Total All
1999 Plan 1998 Plan 1995 Plan Plans
--------- --------- --------- ---------
Outstanding, January 1, 1999....... -- 205,556 230,200 435,756
Grants awarded.................. -- 15,572 -- 15,572
Grants canceled................. -- -- -- --
Vested.......................... -- -- (115,104) (115,104)
--------- --------- --------- ---------
Outstanding, December 31, 1999..... -- 221,128 115,096 336,224
Grants awarded.................. 22,500 2,933 -- 25,433
Grants canceled................. (5,000) (2,066) -- (7,066)
Vested.......................... -- -- (115,096) (115,096)
--------- --------- --------- ---------
Outstanding, December 31, 2000..... 17,500 221,995 -- 239,495
Grants awarded.................. 12,500 434,403 -- 446,903
Grants canceled................. -- -- -- --
Vested January 16, 2001......... -- (217,422) -- (217,422)
--------- --------- --------- ---------
Vested March 27, 2001........... 30,000 438,976 -- 468,976
========= ========= ========= =========
Outstanding December 31, 2001...... 0 0 0 0
As provided under the 1998 Plan, the final performance evaluation
performed on January 16, 2001, resulted in final awards of 258% of the initial
awards with one-third of the total vesting (217,422 shares). All remaining
shares of restricted stock vested on completion of IPALCO's acquisition by AES.
APB Opinion No. 25, "Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees," and
related interpretations in accounting for the stock-based plans have been
applied by Enterprises. No compensation cost has been recognized for any of the
option plans because the stock option exercise price is equal to the fair value
of the underlying common stock at the date of grant. Had compensation cost been
determined based on the fair value at the grant dates for awards under the
plans consistent with the method of SFAS 123, "Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation," Enterprises' net income for the year ended December 31, 2000
would have decreased from $154.6 million ($1.77 per share) to the pro forma
amount of $150.6 million ($1.73 per share). Enterprises' net income and
earnings per share for the similar period in 1999 would have decreased from
$128.9 million ($1.49 per share) to the pro forma amount of $128.4 million
($1.48 per share). Enterprises estimated the SFAS 123 fair values by utilizing
the binomial options pricing model with the following assumptions: dividend
yields of 2.5% to 4.0%, risk-free rates of 5.2% to 6.7%, volatility of 13% to
22% and expected lives of five years.
Compensation expense of $7.5 million and $1.2 million for 2000 and 1999,
respectively, as measured by the market value of the common stock at the
balance sheet date, has been recognized in accordance with the vesting period
for the 1995 and 1998 Plans.
Employees of the Company participate in AES's Stock Option Plan that
provides for grants of stock options to eligible participants. The following
disclosures relate to the Company employees' share of benefits under the plan.
Options granted during 2001 of 679,301, had weighted average fair value per
option of $10.86, using the Black- Scholes valuation method. Significant
assumptions used in the Black-Scholes valuation method for shares granted in
2001 were: expected stock price volatility of 86%; expected dividend yield of
0%; risk-free interest rate of 4.8%; and an expected life of 8.2 years.
Outstanding stock options become exercisable on a cumulative basis
commencing two years from the date of grant with the exception of certain
options which become exercisable commencing one year from the date of grant and
expire ten years after the date of grant. As permitted under Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No.
F-16
123, "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation"(SFAS 123), AES applies APB
Opinion No. 25 "Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees" in accounting for the
plan. As the exercise price of all stock options are equal to their fair market
value at the time the options are granted, the Company did not recognize any
compensation expense related to the program using the intrinsic value base
method. Had compensation expense been recognized using the fair value based
method under SFAS No. 123, the Company's consolidated earnings would have
decreased by $0.8 million in 2001.
Restrictions on the payment of cash dividends or other distributions of
IPL common stock held by IPALCO and on the purchase or redemption of such
shares by IPL are contained in the indenture securing IPL's First Mortgage
Bonds. In addition, pursuant to IPL's Articles of Incorporation, no dividends
may be paid or accrued and no other distribution may be made on IPL's common
stock unless dividends on all outstanding shares of IPL's preferred stock have
been paid or declared and set apart for payment. All of IPL's retained earnings
at December 31, 2001 were free of such restrictions. There are no other
restrictions on the retained earnings of IPALCO.
Cumulative Preferred Stock of Subsidiary: Preferred stock shareholders are
entitled to two votes per share for IPL matters, and if four full quarterly
dividends are in default on all shares of the preferred stock then outstanding,
they are entitled to elect the smallest number of IPL Directors to constitute a
majority. Preferred stock is redeemable solely at the option of IPL and can be
redeemed in whole or in part at any time at specific call prices.
On January 13, 1998, IPL issued the 5.65% Preferred Series, which is
redeemable at par value, subject to certain restrictions, in whole or in part,
at any time on or after January 1, 2008, at the option of IPL.
At December 31, preferred stock consisted of the following:
[Enlarge/Download Table]
December 31, 2001 December 31
------------------------ -------------------
Shares
Outstanding Call Price 2001 2000
----------- ---------- -------- --------
(In Thousands)
Cumulative $100 Par Value, authorized 2,000,000 shares
4% Series.............................................. 47,611 $ 118.00 $ 4,761 $ 4,761
4.2% Series............................................ 19,331 103.00 1,933 1,933
4.6% Series............................................ 2,481 103.00 248 248
4.8% Series............................................ 21,930 101.00 2,193 2,193
5.65% Series........................................... 500,000 -- 50,000 50,000
------- -------- --------
Total cumulative preferred stock....................... 591,353 $ 59,135 $ 59,135
======= ======== ========
During 2001, 2000 and 1999, preferred stock dividends were $3.2 million,
$3.2 million and $3.2 million, respectively.
7. OTHER CURRENT LIABILITIES
Other current liabilities are as follows at December 31:
December 31
-----------------------
2001 2000
---------- --------
(In Thousands)
Customer deposits.............................. $ 8,536 $ 8,597
Deferred fuel cost............................. 8,566 2,942
Other.......................................... 2,795 2,905
---------- --------
Total other current liabilities................ $ 19,897 $ 14,444
========== ========
F-17
8. LONG-TERM DEBT
Long-term debt consists of the following:
December 31,
-----------------------
Series Due 2001 2000
------ --- ---------- ----------
(In Thousands)
IPL First Mortgage Bonds:
6.05% February 2004.............$ 80,000 $ 80,000
8% October 2006.............. 58,800 58,800
7 3/8% August 2007............... 80,000 80,000
6.10%* January 2016.............. 41,850 41,850
5.40%* August 2017............... 24,650 24,650
5.50%* October 2023.............. 30,000 30,000
7.05% February 2024............. 100,000 100,000
6 5/8%* December 2024............. 40,000 40,000
5.75%* August 2021............... 40,000 --
5.90%* December 2024............. 20,000 --
5.95%* December 2029............. 30,000 --
5.95%** August 2030............... 17,350 --
Unamortized discount - net............................. (720) (787)
---------- ----------
Total first mortgage bonds............................. 561,930 454,513
========== ==========
IPL Unsecured Notes
1991* August 2021............... -- 40,000
1994A* December 2024............. -- 20,000
1995B* January 2023.............. 40,000 40,000
1995C* December 2029............. -- 30,000
1996* November 2029............. -- 20,000
1999** August 2030............... -- 23,500
6.375%* November 2029............. 20,000 --
Current maturities..................................... -- (6,150)
---------- ----------
Total long-term debt - IPL............................. 621,930 621,863
---------- ----------
Long-Term Debt - Other:
7.375% Senior Secured Notes, due November 2008...... 375,000 --
7.625% Senior Secured Notes, due November 2011...... 375,000 --
IPALCO Enterprises, Inc. commercial paper........... -- --
SHAPE -- 7.50% notes payable, due upon request...... 300 300
Current maturities..................................... (300) (300)
---------- ----------
Total long-term debt -- other....................... 750,000 --
---------- ----------
Total long-term debt................................$1,371,930 $ 621,863
========== ==========
-------------------
* Notes are issued to the city of Petersburg, Indiana, by IPL to secure the
loan of proceeds from various tax- exempt instruments issued by the city.
** Notes are issued to the Indiana Development Finance Authority (the
"IDFA"), to secure the loan of proceeds from various tax-exempt
instruments issued by the IDFA.
In November 2000, Enterprises sold its Thermal Assets to Citizens Gas &
Coke Utility (see Note 1). Enterprises used a portion of the net proceeds to
retire debt specifically assignable to the assets. The 7.59% ICE note and the
8.03% MAER note were retired in November 2000. In connection with the
retirement of the 7.59% ICE note and the 8.03% MAER note, Mid-America incurred
make-whole payments and wrote off debt issuance costs of $4.3 million (net of
tax), which was recorded as an extraordinary loss. The MAER--1999 Series
variable note was retired in December 2000 and $6.15 million of IPL's 1999
Series note was retired in January 2001.
F-18
From the date of issuance through July 31, 2001, the IPL Series 1991 note
provided for an interest rate that varied with the tax-exempt commercial paper
rate. From the dates of issuance through July 31, 2001, the IPL 1994A, 1995C
and 1996 notes provided for an interest rate that varied with the tax-exempt
weekly rate. The IPL 1995B notes provide for an interest rate that varies with
the tax-exempt weekly rate. These notes are classified as long-term liabilities
because IPL maintains a long-term credit facility supporting these agreements,
which was unused at December 31, 2001. The principal amount of this facility
was $150 million through July 31, 2001. It was reduced to $40.6 million
effective August 1, 2001 to reflect the change in interest rate mode to fixed
from variable. The IPL Series 1999 note provided for an interest rate that
varied based on tax-exempt auction rates. IPL, at its option, can change the
interest rate mode for all of the variable series notes to be based on other
short-term rates.
IPALCO's Revolving Credit Facility (Revolver) was issued in April 1997 in
the amount of $401 million. The proceeds were used to purchase, through a
self-tender offer, shares of IPALCO's outstanding common stock. The Revolver
was terminated on November 14, 2001 upon issuance of the senior secured notes.
In November 2001, Enterprise issued $375 million of 7.375% and $375
million of 7.625% Senior Secured Notes due November 14, 2008 and November 14,
2011, respectively. Interest is paid semi-annually on November 15 and May 15,
commencing May 15, 2002. The after-cost proceeds from the offering were used to
pay $74 million of IPALCO's revolver and distribute $663 million to AES.
The year-end interest rates for the variable rate unsecured notes are as
follows:
Interest Rate at
December 31,
--------------------------
2001 2000
---------- -----------
Series 1991....................................... -- 4.31%
Series 1994A...................................... -- 5.05%
Series 1995B...................................... 1.60% 5.00%
Series 1995C...................................... -- 5.20%
Series 1996....................................... -- 5.20%
Series 1999....................................... -- 4.65%
In conjunction with the issuance of the 1995B note, IPL entered into an
interest rate swap agreement. Pursuant to the swap agreement, IPL will pay
interest at a fixed rate of 5.21% to a swap counterparty and will receive a
variable rate of interest in return, which is identical to the variable rate
payment made on the 1995B note. The result is to effectively establish a fixed
rate of interest on the 1995B note of 5.21%. The interest rate swap agreement
is accounted for on a settlement basis. IPL is exposed to credit loss in the
event of nonperformance by the counterparty for the net interest differential
when floating rates exceed the fixed maximum rate. However, IPL does not
anticipate nonperformance by the counterparty.
In conjunction with the issuance of the Revolver, IPALCO entered into an
interest rate swap agreement which fixed the interest rate on $300 million of
the Revolver. Pursuant to the swap agreement, IPALCO will pay interest at a
fixed rate of 6.3575% to a swap counterparty and will receive a variable rate
of interest in return based on one month LIBOR. Per the swap agreement, in July
1998, the amount covered by the swap began decreasing $25 million each quarter.
The notional amount of the swap at December 31, 2000, was $50 million. The swap
agreement expired on April 1, 2001 with a notional amount balance of $0.
F-19
Maturities on long-term debt subsequent to December 31, 2001, are as
follows:
Maturities
Year Amount
----- -------------
(In Thousands)
2002................................................... $ 300
2003................................................... --
2004................................................... 80,000
2005................................................... --
2006................................................... 58,800
Thereafter............................................. 1,233,130
-----------
Total.................................................. 1,372,230
===========
9. LINES OF CREDIT
IPL has committed lines of credit with banks of $55.0 million used to
provide loans for interim financing. These lines require the payment of
facility fees. At December 31, 2001, no lines of credit were used to support
commercial paper, the entire $55.0 million was unused. These lines of credit,
based on separate agreements, have expiration dates ranging from January 2002
to October 2002. IPL expects to obtain additional liquidity backstop facilities
by the end of the second quarter of 2002.
10. INCOME TAXES
Federal and state income taxes charged to income are as follows:
[Enlarge/Download Table]
2001 2000 1999
----------- ------------ -----------
(In Thousands)
Utility Operating Expenses:
Current income taxes:
Federal........................................$ 63,824 $ 102,171 $ 68,093
State.......................................... 8,592 13,580 9,208
----------- ----------- -----------
Total current taxes......................... 72,416 115,751 77,301
----------- ----------- -----------
Deferred federal income taxes..................... (9,873) (39,520) 8,117
Deferred state income taxes....................... (772) (4,632) 1,824
----------- ----------- -----------
Total deferred income taxes................. (10,645) (44,152) 9,941
----------- ----------- -----------
Net amortization of investment credit............. (2,767) (2,768) (2,767)
----------- ----------- -----------
Total charge to utility operating expenses.. 59,004 68,831 84,475
Net debit (credit) to other income and deductions. (14,388) 44,823 (5,688)
----------- ----------- -----------
44,616 113,654 78,787
Extraordinary loss on early retirement of debt.... -- (2,602) --
----------- ----------- -----------
Total federal and state income tax
provisions................................$ 44,616 $ 111,052 $ 78,787
=========== =========== ===========
F-20
The provision for federal income taxes (including net investment tax
credit adjustments) is different than the amount computed by applying the
statutory tax rate to pretax income. The reasons for the difference, stated as
a percentage of pretax income, are as follows:
2001 2000 1999
------ ------ ------
Federal statutory tax rate................ 35.0% 35.0% 35.0%
Effect of state income taxes.............. (2.1) (1.9) (1.7)
Amortization of investment tax credits.... (2.2) (1.0) (1.3)
Preferred dividends of subsidiary......... 0.9 0.4 0.5
Nondeductible expenses.................... -- 2.8 --
Other - net............................... (1.7) 0.6 (0.1)
---- ---- ----
Effective federal tax rate................ 29.9% 35.9% 32.4%
==== ==== ====
The significant items comprising Enterprises' net deferred tax liability
recognized in the consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2001, and
2000, are as follows:
2001 2000
----------- ------------
(In Thousands)
Deferred tax liabilities:
Relating to utility property................... $ 404,559 $ 405,152
Unrealized gain on investment security......... -- 4
Other.......................................... 4,218 11,717
---------- -----------
Total deferred tax liabilities.............. 408,777 416,873
---------- -----------
Deferred tax assets:
Relating to utility property................... 57,418 50,904
Investment tax credit.......................... 20,474 22,165
Employee benefit plans......................... 58,740 53,691
Other.......................................... 650 14,580
---------- -----------
Total deferred tax assets................... 137,282 141,340
---------- -----------
Net deferred tax liability..................... 271,495 275,533
Current deferred tax liability................. 300 362
---------- -----------
Deferred income taxes - net.................... $ 271,195 $ 275,171
========== ===========
11. RATE MATTERS
Demand Side Management (DSM) Program: On July 30, 1997, IPL received an
IURC order approving a settlement agreement authorizing IPL to recognize in
rates the existing regulatory asset (consisting of DSM costs deferred after
January 31, 1995), along with carrying charges, and also to approve changes to
IPL's DSM programs. This amortization and recovery was completed in November
2000, with all previously deferred DSM costs having been recovered from
customers. On August 18, 1999, IPL received an IURC order approving a
settlement agreement authorizing IPL to extend its low income qualified
residential DSM program through July 30, 2000. Subsequent orders on March 9,
2000 and October 17, 2001 further extended this program through October 17,
2003. The regulatory asset related to this program has a balance of $100 and
$235 at December 31, 2001 and 2000, respectively (see Note 5).
Elect Plan: During 1998, the IURC approved a plan that allows IPL
customers with less than 2,000 kilowatts of demand, an opportunity to choose
optional service or payment plans. This includes a green power option, a fixed
rate per unit of consumption option and a fixed bill option. Customers not
choosing one of these options continue to receive electric service under
existing tariffs. The Elect Plan was extended by IURC order and now will expire
on December 31, 2003 unless a subsequent plan is approved by the IURC.
F-21
12. PENSION BENEFITS
Pension Benefits
------------------------------------------
2001 2000 1999
----------- -------------- -----------
(In Thousands)
Change in benefit obligation
Benefit obligation at beginning
of year.........................$ 341,855 $ 276,607 $ 276,638
Service cost...................... 2,705 5,131 5,845
Interest cost..................... 26,057 20,519 18,899
Actuarial (gain) loss............. 28,191 (13,140) (11,765)
Amendments........................ -- 2,810 764
Partial curtailment loss.......... 1,017 7,953 --
VERP benefit cost................. 18,816 56,771 --
Settlements....................... (13,771) -- --
Settlement loss................... 558 -- --
Benefits paid..................... (22,100) (14,796) (13,774)
----------- ---------- -----------
Benefit obligation at end of year. 383,328 341,855 276,607
----------- ---------- -----------
Change in plan assets
Fair value of plan assets at
beginning of year............... 311,518 310,737 290,770
Actual return on plan assets...... (30,327) 14,935 30,417
Employer contribution............. 10,661 642 3,324
Settlements....................... (13,771) -- --
Benefits paid..................... (22,100) (14,796) (13,774)
----------- ---------- -----------
Fair value of plan assets at end
of year......................... 255,981 311,518 310,737
----------- ---------- -----------
Funded status..................... (127,347) (30,337) 34,130
Unrecognized net gain............. 20,257 (63,887) (70,048)
Unrecognized prior service cost... 6,686 13,497 15,241
Unrecognized net transition
(asset) obligation.............. (5,514) (6,928) (8,341)
Adjustment to recognize minimum
liability....................... 21,430 (3,536) --
----------- ---------- -----------
Accrued benefit cost..............$ (84,488) $ (91,191) $ (29,018)
=========== ========== ===========
Weighted-average assumptions as of
December 31 Discount rate....... 7.25% 8.00% 7.50%
F-22
Pension Benefits
-----------------------------------------
2001 2000 1999
----------- ---------- ----------
(In Thousands)
Components of net periodic benefit
cost
Service cost......................$ 2,705 $ 6,138 $ 8,451
Interest cost..................... 26,057 20,519 18,899
Expected return on plan assets.... (26,364) (27,181) (25,417)
Amortization of transition (asset)
obligation...................... (1,414) (1,414) (1,414)
Amortization of prior service
cost............................ 1,017 1,580 1,394
Recognized actuarial gain......... (1,297) (2,869) (2,051)
----------- ---------- ----------
Net periodic benefit cost......... 704 (3,227) (138)
Amount of curtailment (gain)/loss
recognized...................... 5,403 6,701 --
Amount of settlement (gain)/loss
recognized...................... 4,000 -- --
Cost of special or contractual
termination benefits recognized. 18,816 56,771 --
----------- ---------- ----------
Total pension cost................ 28,923 60,245 (138)
Less: amounts to other parties.. 11 (52) (2)
Less: amounts capitalized....... 135 (586) (48)
----------- ---------- ----------
Amount charged to expense.........$ 28,777 $ 60,883 $ (88)
=========== ========== ==========
The defined benefit pension plan had expected returns on plan assets of
9.0%, for each of the years 2001, 2000 and 1999. During 1999, the defined
benefit plan began using salary bands to determine future benefit costs. The
supplemental retirement pension plan used an expected return on plan assets of
8.0% for each of the years 2001, 2000 and 1999. The supplemental plan assumed
compensation increases to be 6.0% for 2001, 2000 and 1999.
On November 9, 2000, IPALCO implemented a Voluntary Early Retirement
Program (VERP I). This program offers enhanced retirement benefits upon early
retirement to eligible employees. VERP I was available to all employees, except
officers, whose combined age and years of service will total at least 75 on
June 30, 2001. Participation was limited to, and subsequently accepted by 400
qualified employees. Participants elected actual retirement dates in 2001.
Additionally, IPALCO will provide post-retirement benefits to VERP I retirees
until age 55 at which time they will be eligible to receive benefits from the
independent VEBA trustee. IPALCO recognized the $56.8 million pre-tax non-cash
pension and $5.2 million other post-retirement benefit costs of the VERP I in
December 2000.
On June 1, 2001, we approved a second Voluntary Early Retirement Program
(VERP II). Upon expiration of the revocation period on July 23, 2001, 141
employees accepted VERP II. We recognized $17.2 million in pre-tax non-cash
pension costs and $2.6 million in other post-retirement benefit costs
associated with VERP II in the third quarter of 2001.
On September 14, 2001, we approved a third Voluntary Early Retirement
Program (VERP III) limited to personnel at our Petersburg Generating Station.
Upon expiration of the revocation period on October 31, 2001, nine employees
accepted VERP III. We recognized $2.0 million in pre-tax non-cash pension costs
and $2.0 million in other post-retirement benefit costs associated with VERP
III in September 2001.
During 2000, IPL recognized a non-cash $6.7 million curtailment loss for
the supplemental retirement plan reflecting the expected near-term retirement
of certain plan participants. In conjunction with recording a minimum pension
liability of $3.5 million, IPALCO recorded an intangible asset of $1.7 million.
The net difference of $1.8 million was recorded as comprehensive income.
F-23
13. OTHER POST-RETIREMENT BENEFITS
Other Benefits
-------------------------
2001 2000
---------- ----------
(In Thousands)
Change in benefit obligation
Benefit obligation at beginning of year...........$ -- $ 139,999
Service cost...................................... -- 3,323
Interest cost..................................... -- 9,846
Actuarial (gain) loss............................. -- 17,538
Plan amendments................................... -- (19,289)
Settlements....................................... -- (144,703)
Benefits paid..................................... -- (6,714)
---------- ----------
Benefit obligation at end of year................. -- --
---------- ----------
Change in plan assets
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year.... -- 132,524
Actual return on plan assets...................... -- 57
Employer contribution............................. -- 18,836
Settlements....................................... -- (144,703)
Benefits paid..................................... -- (6,714)
---------- ----------
Fair value of plan assets at end of year.......... -- --
---------- ----------
Funded status..................................... -- --
Unrecognized net gain............................. -- --
Unrecognized net transition (asset) obligation.... -- --
Accrued benefit cost.............................. -- --
Weighted-average assumptions as of December 31.... -- --
---------- ----------
Discount rate..................................... -- 7.75%
========== ==========
Other Benefits
----------------------------------------
2001 2000 1999
---------- ---------- ----------
(In Thousands)
Components of net periodic benefit
cost
Service cost.......................$ -- $ 3,323 $ 3,761
Interest cost...................... -- 9,846 10,025
Expected return on plan assets..... -- (9,703) (6,505)
Amortization of transition (asset)
obligation....................... -- 5,100 6,120
Recognized actuarial gain..........$ -- (2,642) (1,556)
---------- ---------- ----------
Net periodic benefit cost.......... -- 5,924 11,845
Curtailment charge (credit)........ -- 55,171 --
Settlement charge (credit)......... -- (46,547) --
Less: amounts capitalized.... -- 1,076 1,895
---------- ---------- ----------
Amount charged to expense..........$ -- $ 13,472 $ 9,950
========== ========== ==========
Other benefit estimates used expected rates of return on plan assets of
9.0% for 2000 and 8.0% for 1999. For measurement purposes, a 5.9% annual rate
of increase in the per capita cost of covered health care benefits was assumed
for 2001. The plan was spun-off on October 20, 2000 to an independent trustee.
Also, during 2000 and 1999, IPL expensed post-retirement regulatory asset
amortization of $4.3 million and $6.4 million, respectively. The final period
of amortization was August 2000.
F-24
On October 20, 2000, IPALCO curtailed and settled its existing
post-retirement medical and life insurance plans (Post-retirement Plans).
Post-retirement plan assets are held by an independent trustee and are
encompassed by a Voluntary Employee Beneficiary Association (VEBA). Existing
eligible retirees and active employees as of March 27, 2001 of IPL who
ultimately retire as active employees of IPL at age 55 or later are eligible to
receive post- retirement benefits from the independent trustee. In November
2000, IPALCO made a $7.5 million payment to the independent trustee as
settlement of its obligations relating to the Post-retirement Plans.
14. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
In 2002, Enterprises anticipates the cost of its construction programs to
be approximately $123.8 million.
Enterprises is involved in litigation arising in the normal course of
business. While the results of such litigation cannot be predicted with
certainty, management, based upon advice of counsel, believes that the final
outcome will not have a material adverse effect on the consolidated financial
statements.
With respect to environmental issues, Enterprises has ongoing discussions
with various regulatory authorities and continues to believe that Enterprises
is in compliance with its various permits. On October 27, 1998, the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency issued a final rule which imposes more
stringent limits on nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions from fossil fuel-fired steam
electric generators. The final requirements of the NOx SIP call, and the timing
of and the costs to comply with it, are subject to the success of any further
judicial review. IPL's current estimates are the NOx SIP call would necessitate
additional capital expenditures of approximately $120 million during 2002- 2005
to achieve the majority of IPL required NOx emission reductions. The intent is
to purchase the remaining NOx emission allowances in the market.
15. INVESTMENTS
Enterprises has classified its investment in marketable equity securities
as available-for-sale, and any unrealized gains or losses are recorded as a
separate component of shareholder's equity. During 1999, Enterprises recorded
directly to shareholders' equity an unrealized after-tax gain of $106.7 million
resulting from its investment in Internet Capital Group, Inc. (Nasdaq: ICGE),
an internet holding company, which went public in August 1999. The gross
unrealized gain on these available-for-sale securities was $174.0 million and
the related taxes would be $67.3 million. The cost basis and the market value
for the investment were $1.2 million and $175.2 million, respectively, at
December 31, 1999 (1,030,600 shares). In 2000, Mid-America sold approximately
one million shares of ICGE resulting in a realized gain of $112.6 million. The
total realized gain is reduced by related compensation expenses and gross
receipts tax of $10.3 million and income taxes of $42.2 million, which are
included in OTHER INCOME AND (DEDUCTIONS). The after-tax proceeds from these
sales were applied primarily to the reduction of IPALCO's outstanding unsecured
debt. During 2000, unrealized losses of $61.8 million ($37.6 million after-tax)
were recorded to reflect the decrease in market price for the unsold shares.
In 1999, Mid-America made a commitment to invest $15.0 million in EnerTech
Capital Partners II L.P., a venture capital fund. The fund invests in service
and technology companies providing innovative products and services that take
advantage of opportunities created by deregulation of the energy and
telecommunications industries. Through December 31, 2001, Mid-America has
funded $4.5 million of such commitment.
16. SEGMENT INFORMATION
Operating segments are components of an enterprise for which separate
financial information is available and is evaluated regularly by the chief
operating decision maker in deciding how to allocate resources and in assessing
performance. Enterprises' reportable business segments are electric and "all
other." Steam operations of IPL, existing from January 1 through November 20,
2000 (see Note 1), and all subsidiaries other than IPL are combined in the "all
other" category. The operations of our Cleveland Energy Resources subsidiary
were in the "all other" segment prior to being sold effective May 21, 2001. The
accounting policies of the identified segments are consistent with those
policies and procedures described in the summary of significant accounting
policies (see Note 2). Intersegment sales are generally based on prices that
reflect the current market conditions. The following tables provide information
about Enterprises' business segments:
F-25
[Enlarge/Download Table]
2001 2000 1999
---------------------------- ---------------------------- ----------------------------
All All All
Electric Other Total Electric Other Total Electric Other Total
-------- ------ -------- -------- ------- ------- -------- ------- -------
(In Millions)
Operating Revenues............ $ 829 $ 7 $ 836 $ 831 $ 59 $ 890 $ 800 $ 69 $ 869
Depreciation and
Amortization............... 111 -- 111 108 6 114 104 7 111
Pre-tax Operating Income...... 189 (10) 179 204 (7) 197 263 10 273
Income Taxes.................. 59 (10) 49 69 54 123 83 3 86
Property -- net of
Depreciation............... 1,665 2 1,667 1,648 12 1,660 1,674 145 1,819
Capital Expenditures.......... 127 1 128 79 -- 79 103 2 105
Included within Depreciation and Amortization for the All Other segment is
IPL steam depreciation of $3 million for each of the years 2000 and 1999.
Included within Pre-tax Operating Income for the All Other segment is IPL steam
pre-tax operating income of $1 million and $5 million for 2000 and 1999,
respectively. Included within Income Taxes for the All Other segment is IPL
steam income taxes of $(.1) million and $1 million for 2000 and 1999,
respectively. Included within Property-net of Depreciation for the All Other
segment is IPL steam plant of $76 million for 1999. Included within Capital
Expenditures for the All Other segment is IPL steam plant of $2 million for
1999.
F-26
17. QUARTERLY RESULTS (UNAUDITED)
Operating results for the years ended December 31, 2001, and 2000, by
quarter, are as follows (in thousands except per share amounts):
[Enlarge/Download Table]
2001
------------------------------------------------------
March 31 June 30 September 30 December 31
---------- ---------- ------------ -----------
Utility operating revenue...... $ 209,052 $ 205,473 $ 224,960 $ 188,561
Utility operating income....... 10,320 46,734 34,799 38,788
Net income..................... (9,640) 34,324 24,712 28,551
2000
------------------------------------------------------
March 31 June 30 September 30 December 31
---------- --------- ------------ -----------
Utility operating revenues..... $ 211,089 $ 204,700 $ 224,720 $ 218,026
Utility operating income....... 48,170 41,784 44,942 1,327
Income before extraordinary
loss on early retirement of
debt......................... 92,327 28,980 30,045 7,490
Extraordinary loss on early
retirement of debt........... (4,259)
Net income..................... 92,327 28,980 30,045 3,231
Weighted average shares........ 85,702 85,713 86,353 88,447
Basic earnings per share before
extraordinary loss........... $ 1.08 $ 0.34 $ 0.35 $ 0.09
Extraordinary loss............. -- -- -- $ 0.05
Basic earnings per share ...... $ 1.08 $ 0.34 $ 0.35 $ 0.04
Weighted average diluted
shares....................... 86,260 86,601 87,265 88,912
Diluted earnings per share
before extraordinary loss.... $ 1.07 $ 0.33 $ 0.34 $ 0.09
Extraordinary loss............. -- -- -- $ 0.05
Diluted earnings per share..... $ 1.07 $ 0.33 $ 0.34 $ 0.04
The quarterly figures reflect seasonal and weather-related fluctuations
that are normal to IPL's operations.
Earnings per share are computed independently for each of the quarters
presented. Therefore, the sum of the quarterly earnings per share may not equal
the total for the year.
The first quarter 2000 results reflect the sale of investment securities
(see Note 15). The fourth quarter 2000 results reflect the sale of thermal
assets (see Note 1) and the Voluntary Early Retirement Program (see Note 12).
The first quarter 2001 results reflect termination benefit agreement costs
(see Note 1).
18. SUBSEQUENT EVENT
On March 29, 2002, Enterprises made a distribution to The AES Corporation
of $51 million which created a deficit in retained earnings.
F-27
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
To the Board of Directors of Indianapolis Power & Light Company:
We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Indianapolis Power &
Light Company (the "Company") as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the related
statements of income, retained earnings and cash flows for each of the three
years in the period ended December 31, 2001. Our audits also included the
financial statement schedule listed in the Index of Item 21. These financial
statements and financial statement schedule are the responsibility of the
Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these
financial statements and financial statement schedule based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally
accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan
and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the
financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes
examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting
principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as
evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our
audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, such financial statements present fairly, in all material
respects, the financial position of Indianapolis Power & Light Company as of
December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the results of its operations and its cash flows
for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2001 in conformity
with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Also in our opinion, such financial statement schedule, when considered in
relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole,
present fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.
/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Indianapolis, Indiana
January 18, 2002
F-28
INDIANAPOLIS POWER & LIGHT COMPANY
Statements of Income
For the Years Ended December 31, 2001, 2000, and 1999
[Download Table]
2001 2000 1999
---------- ---------- ----------
(In Thousands)
OPERATING REVENUES:
Electric..................................$ 828,046 $ 830,955 $ 800,337
Steam..................................... -- 27,580 34,315
---------- ---------- ----------
Total operating revenues................ 828,046 858,535 834,652
---------- ---------- ----------
OPERATING EXPENSES:
Operation:
Fuel.................................... 182,471 190,703 173,872
Other................................... 127,978 154,476 137,348
Power purchased........................... 16,932 13,206 29,769
Purchased steam........................... -- 5,259 6,391
Maintenance............................... 86,356 79,437 77,637
Voluntary early retirement program
benefit costs........................ 23,751 62,007 --
Termination benefit agreement costs....... 54,540 -- --
Depreciation and amortization............. 110,772 111,045 107,469
Taxes other than income taxes............. 35,601 37,348 34,190
Income taxes - net........................ 59,004 68,831 84,475
---------- ---------- ----------
Total operating expenses................ 697,405 722,312 651,151
---------- ---------- ----------
OPERATING INCOME............................ 130,641 136,223 183,501
---------- ---------- ----------
OTHER INCOME AND (DEDUCTIONS):
Allowance for equity funds used during
construction............................ 1,341 2,073 1,372
Other - net............................... (1,803) (2,140) 2,130
Termination benefit agreement costs....... (2,565) -- --
Loss on sale of steam assets............. -- (21,172) --
Income taxes - net........................ 4,135 8,893 (581)
---------- ---------- ----------
Total other income - net................ 1,108 12,346 2,921
---------- ---------- ----------
INCOME BEFORE INTEREST CHARGES.............. 131,749 123,877 186,422
---------- ---------- ----------
INTEREST CHARGES:
Interest on long-term debt................ 38,949 38,413 38,057
Other Interest............................ 544 1,046 1,141
Allowance for borrowed funds used during
construction........................... (633) (961) (829)
Amortization of redemption premiums and
expenses on debt - net................. 2,088 1,926 1,822
---------- ---------- ----------
Total interest charges.................. 40,948 40,424 40,191
---------- ---------- ----------
NET INCOME.................................. 90,948 83,453 146,231
---------- ---------- ----------
PREFERRED DIVIDEND REQUIREMENTS............. 3,213 3,213 3,213
---------- ---------- ----------
INCOME APPLICABLE TO COMMON STOCK...........$ 87,588 $ 80,240 $ 143,018
========== ========== ==========
See notes to financial statements.
F-29
INDIANAPOLIS POWER & LIGHT COMPANY
Balance Sheets
For the Years Ended December 31, 2001 and 2000
[Enlarge/Download Table]
2001 2000
---------- ----------
(In Thousands)
ASSETS
------
UTILITY PLANT:
Utility plant in service........................................ $2,942,190 $2,897,399
Less accumulated depreciation................................... 1,443,736 1,344,403
---------- ----------
Utility plant in service - net............................... 1,498,454 1,552,996
Construction work in progress................................... 156,522 84,146
Property held for future use.................................... 10,741 10,692
---------- ----------
Utility plant - net.......................................... 1,665,717 1,647,834
---------- ----------
OTHER PROPERTY -
At cost, less accumulated depreciation.......................... 5,730 5,719
---------- ----------
CURRENT ASSETS:
Cash and cash equivalents....................................... 9,204 13,938
Accounts receivable and unbilled revenue (less allowance for
doubtful accounts 2001, $1,065,000 and 2000, $1,608,000)..... 47,781 63,222
Receivable due from IPALCO...................................... 1,351 49,553
Fuel - at average cost.......................................... 28,970 23,196
Materials and supplies - at average cost........................ 48,381 48,246
Tax refund receivable........................................... 40 40
Prepayments and other current assets............................ 1,282 1,807
---------- ----------
Total current assets......................................... 137,009 200,002
---------- ----------
DEFERRED DEBITS:
Regulatory assets............................................... 97,809 92,826
Miscellaneous................................................... 13,007 8,829
---------- ----------
Total deferred debits........................................ 110,816 101,655
---------- ----------
TOTAL..................................................... $1,919,272 $1,955,210
========== ==========
CAPITALIZATION AND LIABILITIES
------------------------------
CAPITALIZATION:
Common shareholder's equity:
Common stock.................................................... $ 324,537 $ 324,537
Premium and net gain on preferred stock......................... 2,642 2,642
Retained earnings............................................... 363,083 397,032
Accumulated other comprehensive income.......................... (11,469) (1,820)
---------- ----------
Total common shareholder's equity............................ 678,793 722,391
Cumulative preferred stock...................................... 59,135 59,135
Long-term debt (less current maturities and sinking fund
requirements)................................................ 621,930 621,863
---------- ----------
Total capitalization......................................... 1,359,858 1,403,389
---------- ----------
CURRENT LIABILITIES:
Current maturities and sinking fund requirements................ -- 6,150
Accounts payable................................................ 47,798 25,848
Accrued expenses................................................ 15,074 26,608
Dividends payable............................................... 806 15,240
Taxes accrued................................................... 17,373 30,225
Interest accrued................................................ 14,514 13,037
Other current liabilities....................................... 19,897 14,444
---------- ----------
Total current liabilities.................................... 115,462 131,552
---------- ----------
F-30
INDIANAPOLIS POWER & LIGHT COMPANY
Balance Sheets
For the Years Ended December 31, 2001 and 2000
2001 2000
---------- ----------
(In Thousands)
DEFERRED CREDITS AND OTHER LONG-TERM
LIABILITIES:
Accumulated deferred income taxes - net......................... 271,031 284,340
Unamortized investment tax credit............................... 33,690 36,458
Accrued postretirement benefits................................. 9,504 5,237
Accrued pension benefits........................................ 125,549 91,191
Miscellaneous................................................... 4,178 3,043
---------- ----------
Total deferred credits and other long-term liabilities....... 443,952 420,269
---------- ----------
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
TOTAL..................................................... $1,919,272 $1,955,210
========== ==========
See notes to financial statements.
F-31
INDIANAPOLIS POWER & LIGHT COMPANY
Statements of Cash Flows
For the Years Ended December 31, 2001, 2000 and 1999
[Enlarge/Download Table]
2001 2000 1999
---- ---- ----
(In Thousands)
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATIONS:
Net income (loss)..................................................... $ 90,801 $ 83,453 $ 146,231
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net
cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization......................................... 110,070 110,291 106,311
Amortization of regulatory assets..................................... 3,156 11,633 14,470
Loss from sale of steam assets........................................ -- 21,172 --
Deferred income taxes and investment tax credit adjustments - net..... (22,675) (54,451) 6,227
Allowance for funds used during construction.......................... (1,974) (3,034) (2,201)
Change in certain assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable................................................... 63,643 (63,176) (12,907)
Fuel, materials and supplies.......................................... (5,909) 22,633 (11,960)
Accounts payable and accrued expenses................................. 10,416 (981) (11,024)
Taxes accrued......................................................... (12,852) 7,491 3,795
Accrued pension benefits.............................................. 15,153 5,402 (10,935)
Provision for early retirement program benefit costs.................. 23,751 62,007 --
Other - net........................................................... 350 2,405 (3,148)
---------- ---------- ---------
Net cash provided by operating activities............................. 273,930 204,845 224,859
---------- ---------- ---------
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING:
Construction expenditures............................................. (126,517) (75,712) (103,452)
Proceeds from sale of steam assets.................................... -- 54,650 --
Other................................................................. (5,315) 1,132 (5,832)
---------- ---------- ---------
Net cash used in investing activities................................. (131,832) (19,930) (109,284)
---------- ---------- ---------
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING:
Issuance of long-term debt............................................ -- -- 23,500
Retirement of long-term debt.......................................... (6,150) -- --
Special deposit for retirement of debt................................ -- -- (23,500)
Short-term debt - net................................................. -- (49,000) 29,800
Dividends paid........................................................ (139,183) (138,181) (133,137)
Other................................................................. (1,499) (30) (254)
---------- ---------- ---------
Net cash used in financing activities................................. (146,832) (187,211) (103,591)
---------- ---------- ---------
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents............................. (4,734) (2,296) 11,984
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period...................... 13,938 16,234 4,250
---------- ---------- ---------
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period............................ $ 9,204 $ 13,938 $ 16,234
========== ========== =========
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:
Cash paid during the period for:
Interest (net of amount capitalized)............................... $ 37,392 $ 38,504 $ 39,215
========== ========== =========
Income taxes....................................................... $ 70,296 $ 114,014 $ 79,004
========== ========== =========
See notes to financial statements.
F-32
INDIANAPOLIS POWER & LIGHT COMPANY
Statements of Retained Earnings
For the Years Ended December 31, 2001, 2000 and 1999
[Enlarge/Download Table]
2001 2000 1999
----------- -------------- -----------
(In Thousands)
RETAINED EARNINGS AT BEGINNING OF
YEAR................................................ $ 397,032 $ 453,331 $ 440,747
90,801 83,453 146,231
NET INCOME............................................. --------- ---------- ---------
Total.................................................. 487,833 536,784 586,978
DEDUCT:
Cash dividends declared:
Cumulative preferred stock - at prescribed rate of each
series.............................................. 3,213 3,213 3,213
Common stock........................................... 121,537 136,539 130,434
Total.................................................. 124,750 139,752 133,647
--------- ---------- ---------
RETAINED EARNINGS AT END OF YEAR....................... $ 363,083 $ 397,032 $ 453,331
========= ========== =========
See notes to financial statements.
F-33
INDIANAPOLIS POWER & LIGHT COMPANY
Notes to Financial Statements
For the Years Ended December 31, 2001, 2000 and 1999
1. EXCHANGE AGREEMENT AND ASSET SALES
AES Acquisition: On March 27, 2001, The AES Corporation (AES) completed
its acquisition of IPALCO Enterprises, Inc. (IPALCO) through a share exchange
transaction in accordance with the Agreement and Plan of Share Exchange dated
as of July 15, 2000, among AES and IPALCO (the Share Exchange Agreement).
Pursuant to the Share Exchange Agreement, IPALCO became a wholly-owned
subsidiary of AES, accounted for as a pooling of interests.
At the effective time of the share exchange, each of the outstanding
89,685,177 shares of IPALCO common stock was converted into the right to
receive 0.463 of a share of AES common stock, for an aggregate purchase price
of $2.15 billion and $890 million in assumed debt and preferred stock.
Following the share exchange, AES owns all of the outstanding capital stock of
IPALCO. Treasury stock of $500.6 million was cancelled as a result of the
acquisition. Accordingly, the common stock balance was reduced by $459.8
million and the remaining $40.8 million was applied against retained earnings.
The transaction was subject to certain conditions, including receipt of
regulatory approvals, including that of the Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission and the Securities and Exchange Commission. After the acquisition,
Indianapolis Power & Light Company (IPL) remains a subsidiary of IPALCO.
As a result of the acquisition by AES, IPL has recorded $72.5 million
($44.9 million after tax) of costs related to the termination of certain
employees during 2001. The pretax expenses included $57.1 million in costs
associated with termination benefit agreements and severance, $9.2 million in
supplemental retirement costs, and $6.2 million in restricted stock expense.
Substantially all of the supplemental retirement costs and restricted stock
costs were paid out by March 31, 2001. Termination benefit agreement costs
include amounts paid to officers of IPL under termination benefit agreements
and severance paid to certain other employees upon termination during the first
half of 2001.
Sale of the Assets of the Steam Operations: On November 20, 2000, IPL sold
certain assets (the Assets) to Citizens Gas & Coke Utility. The Assets included
the Perry K Steam Plant and downtown steam distribution system (Steam) operated
by IPL. The selling price of the Assets was $54.7 million. The transaction
resulted in a loss to IPL of $21.2 million ($13.4 million after tax). Of the
net proceeds, $6.2 million was used to retire debt specifically assignable to
the Assets.
2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
All of the outstanding common stock of IPL is owned by IPALCO at December
31, 2001, 2000 and 1999. IPL had a receivable for advances made to IPALCO.
Interest is accrued monthly on the outstanding balance. The receivable and
interest are due on demand.
Nature of Operations: IPL is engaged principally in providing electric and
steam service (through November 20, 2000--see Note 1) to the Indianapolis
metropolitan area.
Concentrations of Risk: Substantially all of IPL's business activity is
with customers located within the Indianapolis area. In addition, approximately
69% of IPL employees are covered by collective bargaining agreements.
Regulation: The retail utility operations of IPL are subject to the
jurisdiction of the Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission (IURC). IPL's
wholesale power transactions are subject to the jurisdiction of the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission. These agencies regulate IPL's utility business
operations, tariffs, accounting, depreciation allowances, services, security
issues and the sale and acquisition of utility properties. The financial
statements of
F-34
INDIANAPOLIS POWER & LIGHT COMPANY
Notes to Financial Statements (Continued)
For the Years Ended December 31, 2001, 2000 and 1999
IPL are based on generally accepted accounting principles in the United States
of America, including the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 71, "Accounting for the Effects of Certain Types of Regulation,"
which gives recognition to the ratemaking and accounting practices of these
agencies.
Revenues: Revenues are recognized as services are provided including those
unbilled at the end of each month.
A fuel adjustment charge provision, which is established after public
hearing, is applicable to most of the rate schedules of IPL and permits the
billing or crediting of estimated fuel costs above or below the levels included
in such rate schedules. Actual fuel costs in excess of or under estimated fuel
costs billed are deferred or accrued, respectively.
IPL is allowed to recover purchased power costs based on a benchmark. If
the cost per Mwh of power purchases is not greater than the benchmark, then the
purchased power costs should be considered net energy costs that are presumed
fuel costs included in purchased power. If the average cost per Mwh of power
purchases is greater than the benchmark, then the costs are recoverable only
through demonstration of the reasonableness of those purchases to the IURC.
Authorized Annual Operating Income: Indiana law requires electric
utilities under the jurisdiction of the IURC to meet operating expense and
income requirements as a condition for approval of requested changes in fuel
adjustment charges. Additionally, customer refunds may result if the utilities'
rolling 12-month operating income, determined at quarterly measurement dates,
exceeds the utilities' authorized annual operating income and cannot be offset
by applicable cumulative net operating income deficiencies. In such a
circumstance, the required customer refund for the quarterly measurement period
is calculated to be one-fourth of the excess annual operating income grossed up
for federal and state taxes as required under I. C. 8-1-2-42.5.
IPL's authorized annual jurisdictional electric net operating income, for
purposes of quarterly operating income tests, is $163 million. This level will
be maintained until changed by an IURC order. During 2001, the Commission found
that IPL's rolling annual jurisdictional retail electric operating income was
less than the authorized annual operating income at each of the quarterly
measurement dates (January, April, July and October). At October 31, 2001,
IPL's most recent quarterly measurement date, IPL had a cumulative net
operating deficiency of $621.0 million. The operating deficiency is calculated
by summing the quarterly measurement period annual results from the date of the
last rate order. As a consequence, IPL could, for a period of time, earn above
$163 million of electric jurisdictional retail net operating income without
being required to make a customer refund.
Through the date of IPL's next general electric rate order, IPL is
required to file upward and downward adjustments in fuel cost credits and
charges on a quarterly basis, based on changes in the cost of fuel,
irrespective of its level of earnings.
Allowance For Funds Used During Construction: In accordance with the
prescribed uniform system of accounts, IPL capitalizes an allowance for the net
cost of funds (interest on borrowed funds and a reasonable rate on equity
funds) used for construction purposes during the period of construction with a
corresponding credit to income. IPL capitalized amounts using pretax composite
rates of 9.4%, 9.2% and 9.4% during 2001, 2000 and 1999, respectively.
Utility Plant and Depreciation: Utility plant is stated at original cost
as defined for regulatory purposes. The cost of additions to utility plant and
replacements of retirement units of property, as distinct from renewals of
minor items that are charged to maintenance, are charged to plant accounts.
Units of property replaced or abandoned in the
F-35
INDIANAPOLIS POWER & LIGHT COMPANY
Notes to Financial Statements (Continued)
For the Years Ended December 31, 2001, 2000 and 1999
ordinary course of business are retired from the plant accounts at cost; such
amounts plus removal costs, less salvage, are charged to accumulated
depreciation. Depreciation is computed by the straight-line method based on
functional rates approved by the IURC and averaged 3.6% during 2001 and 2000
and 3.5% during 1999.
Sale of Accounts Receivable: IPL has sold, on a revolving basis, an
undivided percentage interest in $50 million of its accounts receivable.
Regulatory Assets: Regulatory assets represent deferred costs that have
been included as allowable costs for ratemaking purposes. IPL has recorded
regulatory assets relating to certain costs as authorized by the IURC. Specific
regulatory assets are disclosed in Note 5. As of December 31, 2001, all
regulatory assets have been included as allowable costs in orders of the IURC
(see Note 11). IPL is amortizing such nontax-related regulatory assets to
expense over periods ranging from 1 to 30 years. Tax-related regulatory assets
represent the net income tax costs to be considered in future regulatory
proceedings generally as the tax-related amounts are paid.
In accordance with regulatory treatment, IPL deferred as a regulatory asset
certain post in-service date carrying charges and certain other costs related to
its investment in Unit 4 at the Petersburg Plant ("Petersburg Unit 4"). As
authorized in the 1995 Electric Rate Settlement, IPL, effective September 1,
1995, is amortizing this deferral to expense over a life that generally
approximates the useful life of the related facility. Also in accordance with
regulatory treatment, IPL defers as regulatory assets non-sinking fund debt and
preferred stock redemption premiums and expenses, and amortizes such costs over
the life of the original debt or, in the case of preferred stock redemption
premiums, over 20 years.
Derivatives: IPL has only limited involvement with derivative financial
instruments and does not use them for trading purposes. IPL entered into
interest rate swap agreements as a means of managing the interest rate exposure
on certain of its debt facilities. Prior to the adoption of Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 133 these interest rate swaps were accounted
for under the accrual method. Under this method, the differential to be paid or
received on the interest rate swap agreement is recognized over the life of the
agreement in interest expense. Changes in market value of interest swaps
accounted for under the accrual method are not reflected in the accompanying
financial statements.
Income Taxes: Deferred taxes are provided for all significant temporary
differences between book and taxable income. The effects of income taxes are
measured based on enacted laws and rates. Such differences include the use of
accelerated depreciation methods for tax purposes, the use of different book
and tax depreciable lives, rates and in-service dates and the accelerated tax
amortization of pollution control facilities. Deferred tax assets and
liabilities are recognized for the expected future tax consequences of existing
differences between the financial reporting and tax reporting basis of assets
and liabilities. IPL has recorded as regulatory assets and net deferred tax
liabilities, income taxes payable and includable in allowable costs for
ratemaking purposes in future years. Investment tax credits that reduced
federal income taxes in the years they arose have been deferred and are being
amortized to income over the useful lives of the properties in accordance with
regulatory treatment.
Cash and Cash Equivalents: IPL considers all highly liquid investments
purchased with original maturities of 90 days or less to be cash equivalents.
Comprehensive Income: Comprehensive income was $79.3 million, $78.4
million and $143.0 million for the years ended December 31, 2001, 2000 and
1999, respectively, and was composed of net income, minimum pension liability
adjustments and changes in the fair market value of derivatives.
Employee Benefit Plans: Substantially all employees of IPL are covered by
a defined benefit pension plan, defined contribution plans and a group benefits
plan.
F-36
INDIANAPOLIS POWER & LIGHT COMPANY
Notes to Financial Statements (Continued)
For the Years Ended December 31, 2001, 2000 and 1999
The defined benefit pension plan is noncontributory and is funded through
a trust. Benefits are based on each individual employee's years of service.
Benefit accrual was frozen for all non-union participants effective July 8,
2001. IPL's funding policy is to contribute annually not less than the minimum
required by applicable law, nor more than the maximum amount that can be
deducted for federal income tax purposes. Additionally, a select group of
former management employees of IPL who have terminated vested benefits are
covered under a funded supplemental retirement plan.
The Employees' Thrift Plan of Indianapolis Power & Light Company (Thrift
Plan) is a defined contribution plan sponsored by IPL. Employees elect to make
contributions to the Thrift Plan based on a percentage of their annual base
compensation. Each employee's contribution is matched in amounts up to, but not
exceeding, 4% of the employee's annual base compensation. Employer
contributions to the Thrift Plan were $2.8 million, $3.4 million and $3.5
million for 2001, 2000 and 1999, respectively. As of July 8, 2001 no new
contributions to this plan have accrued or will accrue and participation in
this plan has been frozen with respect to any employee whose terms of
employment are not governed by a collective bargaining agreement.
The group benefits plan is sponsored by IPL and provides certain health
care and life insurance benefits to active employees and employees who retire
from active service on or after attaining age 55 and have rendered at least 10
years of service. The post-retirement benefit costs of this plan were funded
through a Voluntary Employee Beneficiary Association (VEBA) Trust. Effective
October 20, 2000, IPL curtailed and settled for $7.5 million the
post-retirement medical and life insurance benefit portion of its overall group
benefits plan where upon, the assets of the VEBA trust were spun-off to an
independent trustee. On April 30, 2001 all assets of the VEBA trust and
obligations were formally transferred to a newly formed plan - the Voluntary
Employee Beneficiary Association Plan (the "VEBA Plan") that provides
post-retirement medical and life benefits to retirees who were employed by IPL
before March 27, 2001. The VEBA Plan is sponsored and administered by the VEBA
Committee.
New Accounting Pronouncement: Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 133, "Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities" (SFAS
133), requires that an entity recognize all derivatives as either assets or
liabilities on the balance sheet and measure these instruments at fair value.
The Company adopted SFAS 133 on January 1, 2001. The Company designated an
interest rate swap as a cash flow hedge which is recorded as a liability on the
balance sheet and measured at fair value. The effect of adopting SFAS 133
resulted in a decrease to comprehensive income of approximately $2.0 million.
There was no income statement impact as the hedge was determined by management
to be highly effective in accordance with SFAS 133.
In July 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued
SFAS No. 141, "Business Combinations," SFAS No. 142, "Goodwill and Other
Intangible Assets" and SFAS No. 143, "Accounting for Asset Retirement
Obligations". SFAS No. 141 requires business combinations initiated after June
30, 2001, to be accounted for using the purchase method of accounting and
broadens the criteria for recording intangible assets separate from goodwill.
SFAS No. 141 also prohibits the use of pooling-of-interest method for all
business combinations initiated after June 30, 2001.
SFAS No. 142 requires the use of a nonamortization approach to account for
purchased goodwill and certain intangibles. Under a no amortization approach,
goodwill and certain intangibles would not be amortized into results of
operations, but instead would be reviewed for impairment at least annually and
written down and charged to results of operations in the periods in which the
recorded value of goodwill and certain intangibles are determined to be greater
than their fair value. SFAS No. 142 is effective for fiscal years beginning
after December 15, 2001. We do not believe the adoption of SFAS No. 142 will
have any impact on the financial position or results of operations.
F-37
INDIANAPOLIS POWER & LIGHT COMPANY
Notes to Financial Statements (Continued)
For the Years Ended December 31, 2001, 2000 and 1999
SFAS No. 143 addresses financial accounting and reporting for obligations
associated with retirement of tangible long-lived assets and the associated
asset retirement costs. It requires that the fair value of a liability for an
asset retirement obligation be recognized in the period in which it is incurred
if a reasonable estimate of fair value can be made. The associated asset
retirement costs are capitalized as part of the carrying amount of the
long-lived asset. This statement is effective for fiscal years beginning after
June 15, 2002. We have not determined the impact, if any, that this statement
will have on the financial position or results of operations.
SFAS No. 144, "Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived
Assets," was issued in August 2001 and addresses accounting for and reporting
of the impairment or disposal of long-lived assets. SFAS No. 144 is effective
for fiscal years beginning after December 31, 2001. We do not believe the
adoption of SFAS No. 144 will have any impact on the financial position or
results of operations.
Use of Management Estimates: The preparation of financial statements in
conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires that
management make certain estimates and assumptions that affect the reported
amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and
liabilities at the date of the financial statements. The reported amounts of
revenues and expenses during the reporting period may also be affected by the
estimates and assumptions management is required to make. Actual results may
differ from those estimates. During 1999, IPL changed its estimate for unbilled
revenue, which resulted in a $8.0 million increase to unbilled revenue.
Reclassifications: Certain amounts from prior years' consolidated
financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the current year
presentation.
3. UTILITY PLANT IN SERVICE
The original cost of utility plant in service at December 31, segregated
by functional classifications, follows:
2001 2000
---- ----
(In Thousands)
Production................................... $ 1,753,340 $ 1,722,363
Transmission................................. 243,422 241,103
Distribution................................. 792,511 783,618
General...................................... 152,917 150,315
----------- -----------
Total utility plant in service............. $ 2,942,190 $ 2,897,399
=========== ===========
Substantially all of IPL's property is subject to the lien of the
indenture securing IPL's First Mortgage Bonds.
On November 20, 2000, IPL sold the assets of its steam operations to
Citizens Gas & Coke Utility (see Note 1).
4. DISCLOSURES ABOUT FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
The estimated fair value of financial instruments has been determined by
IPL using available market information and appropriate valuation methodologies.
However, considerable judgment is required in interpreting market data to
develop the estimates of fair value. Accordingly, the estimates presented
herein are not necessarily indicative of the amounts that IPL could realize in
a current market exchange. The use of different market assumptions and/or
estimation methodologies may have a material effect on the estimated fair value
amounts.
F-38
INDIANAPOLIS POWER & LIGHT COMPANY
Notes to Financial Statements (Continued)
For the Years Ended December 31, 2001, 2000 and 1999
Cash and Cash Equivalents and Notes Payable: The carrying amount
approximates fair value due to the short maturity of these instruments.
Available-For-Sale Securities: These securities are carried at fair value
based on the market price at the end of the reporting period.
Long-Term Debt, Including Current Maturities and Sinking Fund
Requirements: Interest rates that are currently available to IPL for issuance
of debt with similar terms and remaining maturities are used to estimate fair
value. The variable rate debt has been included at the face amount for both
carrying amount and fair value. The fair values of the interest rate swap
agreements of IPL have been estimated to be $(3.7) million and $(3.1) million
at December 31, 2001 and 2000, respectively. These amounts represent what IPL
would either pay or receive to enter into equivalent agreements with a swap
counterparty. The fair value of the debt outstanding has been determined on the
basis of the specific securities issued and outstanding. Accordingly, the
purpose of this disclosure is not to approximate the value on the basis of how
the debt might be refinanced. At December 31, 2001, and 2000, the carrying
amount of IPL's long-term debt, including current maturities and sinking fund
requirements, and the approximate fair value are as follows:
2001 2002
---- ----
(In Thousands)
Carrying amount.................................. $ 621,931 $ 628,013
Approximate fair value........................... 627,162 635,420
5. REGULATORY ASSETS
The amounts of regulatory assets at December 31 are as follows:
2001 2002
---- ----
(In Thousands)
Related to deferred taxes (Note 2)............... $ 52,033 $ 45,435
Unamortized reacquisition premium on debt
(Note 2)...................................... 19,666 20,091
Unamortized Petersburg Unit 4 carrying
charges and certain other costs (Note 2)...... 26,010 27,065
Demand side management costs (Note 11)........... 100 235
-------- ---------
Total regulatory assets.......................... $ 97,809 $ 92,826
======== =========
6. CAPITAL STOCK
Common Stock: There were no changes in IPL's common stock during 2001,
2000, and 1999.
Restrictions on the payment of cash dividends or other distributions of
common stock and on the purchase or redemption of such shares are contained in
the indenture securing IPL's First Mortgage Bonds. In addition, pursuant to
IPL's Articles of Incorporation, no dividend may be paid or accrued and no
other distribution may be made on the common stock unless dividends on all
outstanding shares of preferred stock have been paid or declared and set apart
for payment. All of the retained earnings at December 31, 2001, were free of
such restrictions.
Cumulative Preferred Stock: Preferred stock shareholders are entitled to
two votes per share for IPL matters, and if four full quarterly dividends are
in default on all shares of the preferred stock then outstanding, they are
entitled to elect the smallest number of IPL Directors to constitute a
majority. Preferred stock is redeemable solely at the option of IPL and can be
redeemed in whole or in part at any time at specific call prices.
F-39
INDIANAPOLIS POWER & LIGHT COMPANY
Notes to Financial Statements (Continued)
For the Years Ended December 31, 2001, 2000 and 1999
On January 13, 1998, IPL issued the 5.65% Preferred Series, which is
redeemable at par value, subject to certain restrictions, in whole or in part,
at any time on or after January 1, 2008, at the option of IPL.
At December 31, preferred stock consisted of the following:
[Enlarge/Download Table]
December 31, 2001 December 31
---------------------- -------------------
Shares Call
Outstanding Price 2001 2000
----------- ----- ---- ----
(In Thousands)
Cumulative $100 Par Value, authorized 2,000,000 shares
4% Series............................................... 47,611 $ 118.00 $ 4,761 $ 4,761
4.2% Series............................................. 19,331 103.00 1,933 1,933
4.6% Series............................................. 2,481 103.00 248 248
4.8% Series............................................. 21,930 101.00 2,193 2,193
5.65% Series............................................ 500,000 -- 50,000 50,000
---- ------- ------ ------
Total cumulative preferred stock........................ 591,353 59,135 $ 59,135
======= ====== ========
During 2001, 2000 and 1999, preferred stock dividends were $3.2 million,
$3.2 million and $3.2 million, respectively.
7. OTHER CURRENT LIABILITIES
Other current liabilities are as follows at December 31:
December 31
-------------------
2001 2000
-------- --------
(In Thousands)
Customer deposits....................................... $ 8,536 $ 8,597
Deferred fuel cost...................................... 8,566 2,942
Other................................................... 2,795 2,905
-------- --------
Total other current liabilities......................... $ 19,897 $ 14,444
======== ========
F-40
INDIANAPOLIS POWER & LIGHT COMPANY
Notes to Financial Statements (Continued)
For the Years Ended December 31, 2001, 2000 and 1999
8. LONG-TERM DEBT
Long-term debt consists of the following:
December 31,
---------------------
Series Date 2001 2000
------ ---- --------- ---------
(In Thousands)
IPL First Mortgage Bonds:
6.05% February 2004............. $ 80,000 $ 80,000
8% October 2006.............. 58,800 58,800
7 3/8% August 2007............... 80,000 80,000
6.10%* January 2016.............. 41,850 41,850
5.40%* August 2017............... 24,650 24,650
5.50%* October 2023.............. 30,000 30,000
7.05% February 2024............. 100,000 100,000
6 5/8%* December 2024............. 40,000 40,000
5.75%* August 2021............... 40,000 --
5.90%* December 2024............. 20,000 --
5.95%* December 2029............. 30,000 --
5.95%** August 2030............... 17,350 --
Unamortized discount - net............................. (720) (787)
--------- --------
Total first mortgage bonds............................. 561,930 454,513
========= ========
IPL Unsecured Notes
1991* August 2021............... -- 40,000
1994A* December 2024............. -- 20,000
1995B* January 2023.............. 40,000 40,000
1995C* December 2029............. -- 30,000
1996* November 2029............. -- 20,000
1999** August 2030............... -- 23,500
6.375%* November 2029............. 20,000 --
Current maturities..................................... -- (6,150)
--------- ---------
Total long-term debt................................... 621,930 621,863
--------- ---------
-------------------
* Notes are issued to the city of Petersburg, Indiana, by IPL to secure the
loan of proceeds from various tax-exempt instruments issued by the city.
** Notes are issued to the Indiana Development Finance Authority (the
"IDFA"), by IPL to secure the loan of proceeds from various tax-exempt
instruments issued by the IDFA.
In November 2000, IPL sold its steam assets to Citizens Gas & Coke Utility
(see Note 1). IPL used a portion of the net proceeds to retire debt
specifically assignable to the assets. In January 2001, IPL retired $6.15
million of its 1999 Series note.
From the date of issuance through July 31, 2001, the IPL Series 1991 note
provided for an interest rate that varied with the tax-exempt commercial paper
rate. From the dates of issuance through July 31, 2001, the IPL 1994A, 1995C
and 1996 notes provided for an interest rate that varied with the tax-exempt
weekly rate. The IPL 1995B notes provide for an interest rate that varies with
the tax-exempt weekly rate. These notes are classified as long-term liabilities
because IPL maintains a long-term credit facility supporting these agreements,
which was unused at December 31, 2001. The principal amount of this facility
was $150 million through July 31, 2001. It was
F-41
INDIANAPOLIS POWER & LIGHT COMPANY
Notes to Financial Statements (Continued)
For the Years Ended December 31, 2001, 2000 and 1999
reduced to $40.6 million effective August 1, 2001 to reflect the change in
interest rate mode to fixed from variable. The IPL Series 1999 note provided
for an interest rate that varied based on tax-exempt auction rates. IPL, at its
option, can change the interest rate mode for all of the variable series notes
to be based on other short-term rates.
The year-end interest rates for the variable rate unsecured notes are as
follows:
Interest Rate at
December 31,
---------------------------
2001 2000
------------ ------------
Series 1991..................................... -- 4.31%
Series 1994A.................................... -- 5.05%
Series 1995B.................................... 1.60% 5.00%
Series 1995C.................................... -- 5.20%
Series 1996..................................... -- 5.20%
Series 1999..................................... -- 4.65%
In conjunction with the issuance of the 1995B note, IPL entered into an
interest rate swap agreement. Pursuant to the swap agreement, IPL will pay
interest at a fixed rate of 5.21% to a swap counterparty and will receive a
variable rate of interest in return, which is identical to the variable rate
payment made on the 1995B note. The result is to effectively establish a fixed
rate of interest on the 1995B note of 5.21%. The interest rate swap agreement
is accounted for on a settlement basis. IPL is exposed to credit loss in the
event of nonperformance by the counterparty for the net interest differential
when floating rates exceed the fixed maximum rate. However, IPL does not
anticipate nonperformance by the counterparty.
Maturities on long-term debt subsequent to December 31, 2001, are as
follows:
Maturities
Year Amount
---- --------------
(In Thousands)
2002....................................................... $ --
2003....................................................... --
2004....................................................... 80,000
2005....................................................... --
2006....................................................... 58,800
Thereafter................................................. 483,130
----------
Total long-term debt....................................... $ 621,930
==========
9. LINES OF CREDIT
IPL has committed lines of credit with banks of $55.0 million used to
provide loans for interim financing. These lines require the payment of
facility fees. At December 31, 2001, no lines of credit were used to support
commercial paper, the entire $55.0 million was unused. These lines of credit,
based on separate agreements, have expiration dates ranging from January 2002
to October 2002. IPL expects to obtain additional liquidity backstop facilities
by the end of the second quarter of 2002.
F-42
INDIANAPOLIS POWER & LIGHT COMPANY
Notes to Financial Statements (Continued)
For the Years Ended December 31, 2001, 2000 and 1999
The weighted average interest rate on notes payable and commercial paper
outstanding was not applicable at December 31, 2001 or December 31, 2000 since
the principal outstanding was zero for each year.
10. INCOME TAXES
Federal and state income taxes charged to income are as follows:
[Enlarge/Download Table]
2001 2000 1999
---- ---- ----
(In Thousands)
Utility Operating Expenses:
Current income taxes:
Federal............................................... $ 63,824 $ 102,171 $ 68,093
State................................................. 8,592 13,580 9,208
---------- ---------- ----------
Total current taxes................................ 72,416 115,751 77,301
---------- ---------- ----------
Deferred federal income taxes............................ (9,873) (39,520) 8,117
Deferred state income taxes.............................. (772) (4,632) 1,824
---------- ---------- ----------
Total deferred income taxes........................ (10,645) (44,152) 9,941
---------- ---------- ----------
Net amortization of investment credit.................... (2,767) (2,768) (2,767)
---------- ---------- ----------
Total charge to utility operating expenses......... 59,004 68,831 84,475
Net debit (credit) to other income and deductions........ (4,135) 8,893 581
---------- ---------- ----------
Total federal and state income tax provisions...... $ 54,869 $ 59,938 $ 85,056
========== ========== ==========
The provision for federal income taxes (including net investment tax
credit adjustments) is different than the amount computed by applying the
statutory tax rate to pretax income. The reasons for the difference, stated as
a percentage of pretax income, are as follows:
2001 2000 1999
---- ---- ----
Federal statutory tax rate.......................... 35.0% 35.0% 35.0%
Effect of state income taxes........................ (1.7) (2.0) (1.7)
Amortization of investment tax credits.............. (1.9) (1.9) (1.2)
Nondeductible expenses.............................. -- 3.6 --
Other - net......................................... 1.4 1.5 (0.2)
---- ---- ----
Effective federal tax rate.......................... 32.8% 36.2% 31.9%
==== ==== ====
The significant items comprising IPL's net deferred tax liability
recognized in the consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2001, and
2000, are as follows:
F-43
INDIANAPOLIS POWER & LIGHT COMPANY
Notes to Financial Statements (Continued)
For the Years Ended December 31, 2001, 2000 and 1999
2001 2000
----------- -----------
(In Thousands)
Deferred tax liabilities:
Relating to utility property..................... $ 404,559 $ 405,152
Other............................................ 5,397 9,440
---------- ---------
Total deferred tax liabilities................ 409,956 414,592
---------- ---------
Deferred tax assets:
Relating to utility property..................... 57,418 50,904
Investment tax credit............................ 20,474 22,165
Employee benefit plans........................... 58,530 52,934
Other............................................ 2,203 3,887
---------- ---------
Total deferred tax assets..................... 138,625 129,890
---------- ---------
Net deferred tax liability....................... 271,331 284,702
Current deferred tax liability................... 300 362
---------- ---------
Deferred income taxes - net...................... $ 271,031 $ 284,340
========== =========
11. RATE MATTERS
Demand Side Management (DSM) Program: On July 30, 1997, IPL received an
IURC order approving a settlement agreement authorizing IPL to recognize in
rates the existing regulatory asset (consisting of DSM costs deferred after
January 31, 1995), along with carrying charges, and also to approve changes to
IPL's DSM programs. This amortization and recovery was completed in November
2000, with all previously deferred DSM costs having been recovered from
customers. On August 18, 1999, IPL received an IURC order approving a
settlement agreement authorizing IPL to extend its low income qualified
residential DSM program through July 30, 2000. Subsequent orders on March 9,
2000 and October 17, 2001 further extended this program through October 17,
2003. The regulatory asset related to this program has a balance of $100 and
$235 at December 31, 2001 and 2000, respectively (see Note 5).
Elect Plan: During 1998, the IURC approved a plan that allows IPL
customers with less than 2,000 kilowatts of demand, an opportunity to choose
optional service or payment plans. This includes a green power option, a fixed
rate per unit of consumption option and a fixed bill option. Customers not
choosing one of these options continue to receive electric service under
existing tariffs. The Elect Plan was extended by IURC order and now will expire
on December 31, 2003 unless a subsequent plan is approved by the IURC.
F-44
INDIANAPOLIS POWER & LIGHT COMPANY
Notes to Financial Statements (Continued)
For the Years Ended December 31, 2001, 2000 and 1999
12. PENSION BENEFITS
[Enlarge/Download Table]
Pension Benefits
------------------------------------------
2001 2000 1999
----------- ----------- ------------
(In Thousands)
Change in benefit obligation
Benefit obligation at beginning of year................. $ 341,855 $ 276,607 $ 276,638
Service cost............................................ 2,705 5,131 5,845
Interest cost........................................... 26,057 20,519 18,899
Actuarial (gain) loss................................... 28,191 (13,140) (11,765)
Amendments.............................................. -- 2,810 764
Partial curtailment loss................................ 1,017 7,953 --
VERP benefit cost....................................... 18,816 56,771 --
Settlements............................................. (13,771) -- --
Settlement loss......................................... 558 -- --
Benefits paid........................................... (22,100) (14,796) (13,774)
----------- ----------- -----------
Benefit obligation at end of year....................... 383,328 341,855 276,607
----------- ----------- -----------
Change in plan assets
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year.......... 311,518 310,737 290,770
Actual return on plan assets............................ (30,327) 14,935 30,417
Employer contribution................................... 10,661 642 3,324
Settlements............................................. (13,771) -- --
Benefits paid........................................... (22,100) (14,796) (13,774)
----------- ----------- -----------
Fair value of plan assets at end of year................ 255,981 311,518 310,737
----------- ----------- -----------
Funded status........................................... (127,347) (30,337) 34,130
Unrecognized net gain................................... 20,257 (63,887) (70,048)
Unrecognized prior service cost......................... 6,686 13,497 15,241
Unrecognized net transition (asset) obligation.......... (5,514) (6,928) (8,341)
Adjustment to recognize minimum liability............... 21,430 (3,536) --
----------- ----------- -----------
Accrued benefit cost.................................... $ (84,488) $ (91,191) $ (29,018)
=========== =========== ===========
Weighted-average assumptions as of December 31
Discount rate........................................... 7.25% 8.00% 7.50%
F-45
INDIANAPOLIS POWER & LIGHT COMPANY
Notes to Financial Statements (Continued)
For the Years Ended December 31, 2001, 2000 and 1999
[Enlarge/Download Table]
Pension Benefits
------------------------------------------
2001 2000 1999
----------- ----------- ------------
(In Thousands)
Components of net periodic benefit cost
Service cost............................................ $ 2,705 $ 6,138 $ 8,451
Interest cost........................................... 26,057 20,519 18,899
Expected return on plan assets.......................... (26,364) (27,181) (25,417)
Amortization of transition (asset) obligation........... (1,414) (1,414) (1,414)
Amortization of prior service cost...................... 1,017 1,580 1,394
Recognized actuarial gain............................... (1,297) (2,869) (2,051)
--------- ---------- ---------
Net periodic benefit cost............................... 704 (3,227) (138)
Amount of curtailment (gain)/loss recognized............ 5,403 6,701 --
Amount of settlement (gain)/loss recognized............. 4,000 -- --
Cost of special or contractual termination
benefits recognized................................. 18,816 56,771 --
--------- ---------- ---------
Total pension cost...................................... 28,923 60,245 (138)
Less: amounts to other parties....................... 11 (52) (2)
Less: amounts capitalized............................ 135 (586) (48)
--------- ---------- ---------
Amount charged to expense............................... $ 28,777 $ 60,883 $ (88)
========= ========== ==========
The defined benefit pension plan had expected returns on plan assets of
9.0%, for each of the years 2001, 2000 and 1999. During 1999, the defined
benefit plan began using salary bands to determine future benefit costs. The
supplemental retirement pension plan used an expected return on plan assets of
8.0% for each of the years 2001, 2000 and 1999. The supplemental plan assumed
compensation increases to be 6.0% for 2001, 2000 and 1999.
On November 9, 2000, IPL implemented a one-time Voluntary Early Retirement
Program (VERP I). This program offers enhanced retirement benefits upon early
retirement to eligible employees. VERP I was available to all employees, except
officers, whose combined age and years of service will total at least 75 on
June 30, 2001. Participation was limited to, and subsequently accepted by 400
qualified employees. Participants elected actual retirement dates in 2001.
Additionally, IPL will provide post-retirement benefits to VERP I retirees
until age 55 at which time they will be eligible to receive benefits from the
independent VEBA trustee. IPL recognized the $56.8 million pre-tax non-cash
pension and $5.2 million other post-retirement benefit costs of the VERP I in
December 2000.
On June 1, 2001, we approved a second Voluntary Early Retirement Program
(VERP II). Upon expiration of the revocation period on July 23, 2001, 141
employees accepted VERP II. We recognized $17.2 million in pre-tax non-cash
pension costs and $2.6 million in other post-retirement benefit costs
associated with VERP II in the third quarter of 2001.
On September 14, 2001, we approved a third Voluntary Early Retirement
Program (VERP III) limited to personnel at our Petersburg Generating Station.
Upon expiration of the revocation period on October 31, 2001, nine employees
accepted VERP III. We recognized $2.0 million in pre-tax non-cash pension costs
and $2.0 million in other post-retirement benefit costs associated with VERP
III in September 2001.
During 2000, IPL recognized a non-cash $6.7 million curtailment loss for
the supplemental retirement plan reflecting the expected near-term retirement
of certain plan participants. In conjunction with recording a minimum pension
liability of $3.5 million, IPL recorded an intangible asset of $1.7 million.
The net difference of $1.8 million was recorded as comprehensive income.
F-46
INDIANAPOLIS POWER & LIGHT COMPANY
Notes to Financial Statements (Continued)
For the Years Ended December 31, 2001, 2000 and 1999
13. OTHER POST-RETIREMENT BENEFITS
Other Benefits
---------------------
2001 2000
-------- ----------
(In Thousands)
Change in benefit obligation
Benefit obligation at beginning of year................ $ -- $ 139,999
Service cost........................................... -- 3,323
Interest cost.......................................... -- 9,846
Actuarial (gain) loss.................................. -- 17,538
Plan amendments........................................ -- (19,289)
Settlements............................................ -- (144,703)
Benefits paid.......................................... -- (6,714)
----- ----------
Benefit obligation at end of year...................... -- --
----- ----------
Change in plan assets
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year......... -- 132,524
Actual return on plan assets........................... -- 57
Employer contribution.................................. -- 18,836
Settlements............................................ -- (144,703)
Benefits paid.......................................... -- (6,714)
----- ----------
Fair value of plan assets at end of year............... -- --
----- ----------
Funded status.......................................... -- --
Unrecognized net gain.................................. -- --
Unrecognized net transition (asset) obligation......... -- --
Accrued benefit cost................................... -- --
Weighted-average assumptions as of December 31 -- --
----- ----------
Discount rate.......................................... -- 7.75%
===== ==========
[Enlarge/Download Table]
Other Benefits
-------------------------------
2001 2000 1999
-------- -------- ---------
(In Thousands)
Components of net periodic benefit cost
Service cost.......................................... $ -- $ 3,323 $ 3,761
Interest cost......................................... -- 9,846 10,025
Expected return on plan assets........................ -- (9,703) (6,505)
Amortization of transition (asset) obligation......... -- 5,100 6,120
Recognized actuarial gain............................. $ -- (2,642) (1,556)
------ ------- --------
Net periodic benefit cost............................. -- 5,924 11,845
Curtailment charge (credit)........................... -- 55,171 --
Settlement charge (credit)............................ -- (46,547) --
Less: amounts capitalized....................... -- 1,076 1,895
------ ------- --------
Amount charged to expense............................. $ -- $13,472 $ 9,950
====== ======= ========
F-47
INDIANAPOLIS POWER & LIGHT COMPANY
Notes to Financial Statements (Continued)
For the Years Ended December 31, 2001, 2000 and 1999
Other benefit estimates used expected rates of return on plan assets of
9.0% for 2000 and 8.0% for 1999. For measurement purposes, a 5.9% annual rate
of increase in the per capita cost of covered health care benefits was assumed
for 2001. The plan was spun-off on October 20, 2000 to an independent trustee.
Also, during 2000 and 1999, IPL expensed post-retirement regulatory asset
amortization of $4.3 million and $6.4 million, respectively. The final period
of amortization was August 2000.
On October 20, 2000, IPL curtailed and settled its existing
post-retirement medical and life insurance plans (Post-retirement Plans).
Post-retirement plan assets are held by an independent trustee and are
encompassed by a Voluntary Employee Beneficiary Association (VEBA). Existing
eligible retirees and active employees as of March 27, 2001 of IPL who
ultimately retire as active employees of IPL at age 55 or later are eligible to
receive post-retirement benefits from the independent trustee. In November
2000, IPALCO made a $7.5 million payment to the independent trustee as
settlement of its obligations relating to the Post-retirement Plans.
14. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
In 2002, IPL anticipates the cost of its construction programs to be
approximately $123.8 million.
IPL is involved in litigation arising in the normal course of business.
While the results of such litigation cannot be predicted with certainty,
management, based upon advice of counsel, believes that the final outcome will
not have a material adverse effect on the consolidated financial statements.
With respect to environmental issues, IPL has ongoing discussions with
various regulatory authorities and continues to believe that IPL is in
compliance with its various permits. On October 27, 1998, the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency issued a final rule which imposes more
stringent limits on nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions from fossil fuel-fired steam
electric generators. The final requirements of the NOx SIP call, and the timing
of and the costs to comply with it, are subject to the success of any further
judicial review. IPL's current estimates are the NOx SIP call would necessitate
additional capital expenditures of approximately $120 million during 2002- 2005
to achieve the majority of IPL required NOx emission reductions. The intent is
to purchase the remaining NOx emission allowances in the market.
15. SEGMENT INFORMATION
Operating segments are components of IPL for which separate financial
information is available and is evaluated regularly by the chief operating
decision maker in deciding how to allocate resources and in assessing
performance. IPL's reportable business segments are electric and "all other."
Steam operations of IPL, existing from January 1 through November 20, 2000 (see
Note 1), and all subsidiaries other than IPL are combined in the "all other"
category. The accounting policies of the identified segments are consistent
with those policies and procedures described in the summary of significant
accounting policies (see Note 2). Intersegment sales are
F-48
INDIANAPOLIS POWER & LIGHT COMPANY
Notes to Financial Statements (Continued)
For the Years Ended December 31, 2001, 2000 and 1999
generally based on prices that reflect the current market conditions. The
following tables provide information about IPL's business segments:
[Enlarge/Download Table]
2001 2000 1999
---------------------------- -------------------------- -------------------------
All All All
Electric Other Total Electric Other Total Electric Other Total
-------- ----- ----- -------- ----- ----- -------- ----- -----
(In Millions)
Operating Revenues............ $ 828 $ $ 828 $ 831 $ 28 $ 859 $ 800 $ 35 $ 835
Depreciation and
Amortization............... 111 -- 111 108 3 111 104 3 107
Pre-tax Operating Income...... 189 -- 189 204 1 205 263 5 268
Income Taxes.................. 59 -- 59 69 -- 69 83 1 84
Property -- net of
Depreciation............... 1,665 -- 1,665 1,648 -- 1,648 1,674 76 1,750
Capital Expenditures.......... 127 -- 127 79 -- 79 103 2 105
Included within Depreciation and Amortization for the All Other segment is
IPL steam depreciation of $3 million for each of the years 2000 and 1999.
Included within Pre-tax Operating Income for the All Other segment is IPL steam
pre-tax operating income of $1 million and $5 million for 2000 and 1999,
respectively. Included within Income Taxes for the All Other segment is IPL
steam income taxes of $(.1) million and $1 million for 2000 and 1999,
respectively. Included within Property--net of Depreciation for the All Other
segment is IPL steam plant of $76 million for 1999. Included within Capital
Expenditures for the All Other segment is IPL steam plant of $2 million for
1999.
16. QUARTERLY RESULTS (UNAUDITED)
Operating results for the years ended December 31, 2001, and 2000, by
quarter, are as follows (in thousands except per share amounts):
[Enlarge/Download Table]
2001
-----------------------------------------------------
March 31 June 30 September 30 December 31
---------- --------- ------------ -----------
Utility operating revenue.............. $ 209,052 $ 205,473 $ 224,960 $ 188,561
Utility operating income............... 10,320 46,734 34,799 38,788
Net income............................. (893) 36,757 24,416 30,521
2000
-----------------------------------------------------
March 31 June 30 September 30 December 31
---------- --------- ------------ -----------
Utility operating revenues............ $ 211,089 $ 204,700 $ 224,720 $ 218,026
Utility operating income.............. 48,170 41,784 44,942 1,327
Net income............................ 38,250 18,887 34,564 (8,248)
The quarterly figures reflect seasonal and weather-related fluctuations
that are normal to IPL's operations.
The second quarter 2000 results reflect the impairment of steam assets
recorded in anticipation of the sale of steam assets which occurred in the
fourth quarter (see Note 1). The fourth quarter 2000 results reflect the
Voluntary Early Retirement Program (see Note 12).
The first quarter 2001 results reflect termination benefit agreement costs
(see Note 1).
F-49
PART II
INFORMATION NOT REQUIRED IN PROSPECTUS
Item 20. Indemnification of Directors and Officers.
Chapter 37 of the Indiana Business Corporation Law, as amended (the "IBCL"),
authorizes every Indiana corporation to indemnify its officers and directors
under certain circumstances against liability incurred in connection with
proceedings to which the officers or directors are made parties by reason of
their relationships to the corporation. Officers and directors may be
indemnified where they have acted in good faith, the action taken was not
against the interests of the corporation, and the action was lawful or there
was no reason or cause to believe the action was unlawful. Chapter 37 of the
IBCL also requires every Indiana corporation to indemnify any of its officers
or directors (unless limited by the articles of incorporation of the
corporation) who were wholly successful on the merits or otherwise, in the
defense of any such proceeding, against reasonable expenses incurred in
connection with the proceeding. A corporation may also, under certain
circumstances, pay for or reimburse the reasonable expenses incurred by an
officer or director who is a party to a proceeding in advance of final
disposition of the proceeding.
The Second Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of IPALCO
provide that, to the extent not inconsistent with applicable law, IPALCO shall
indemnify a person who is a director, officer, employee or agent of IPALCO or
who is or was serving at the request of IPALCO as a director, officer,
employee, agent or fiduciary of another foreign or domestic corporation,
partnership, joint venture, trust, employee benefit plan or other organization
or entity (an "Eligible Person") against any pending, threatened or completed
claim, action, suit or proceeding and all appeals thereof (whether brought by
or in the right of IPALCO or any other corporation or otherwise), civil,
criminal, administrative or investigative, formal or informal, in which an
Eligible Person may become involved, as a party or otherwise, by reason of his
or her being or having been an Eligible Person, or by reason of any action
taken or not taken by him or her in his or her capacity as an Eligible Person,
whether or not he or she continued in such capacity at the time such liability
or expense shall have been incurred (a "Claim"), (i) if such Eligible Person is
Wholly Successful with respect to the Claim, or (ii) if not Wholly Successful,
then if such Eligible Person is determined to have acted in good faith in what
he or she reasonably believed to be the best interests of IPALCO or at least
not opposed to its best interests and, in addition, with respect to any
criminal claim is determined to have had reasonable cause to believe that his
or her conduct was lawful or had no reasonable cause to believe that his or her
conduct was unlawful. For purposes of this indemnification provision, the term
"Wholly Successful" means: (i) the termination of any Claim against an Eligible
Person without any finding of liability or guilt against him; (ii) the approval
by a court or agency, with knowledge of the above indemnity provisions, of a
settlement of any Claim; or (iii) the expiration of a reasonable period of time
after the threatened making of any Claim without commencement of an action,
suit or proceeding and without any payment or promise made to induce a
settlement.
The AES Corporation has agreed to indemnify CT Corporation ("CT") its
affiliates, employees and agents against all damages, costs and expenses of any
nature incurred or sustained by CT, its affiliated companies and its employees
and agents, in good faith and without negligence, in connection with the
services provided by CT employees who serve as independent directors of IPALCO.
Further, The AES Corporation has agreed that CT's entire liability for such
services shall not exceed the annual charge paid for the services giving rise
to the liability, and that CT will not be liable for lost profits or
third-party claims, consequential or exemplary damages.
IPALCO's parent, The AES Corporation, has purchased and maintains
directors' and officers' insurance which provides coverage for the directors of
its subsidiaries, including IPALCO.
II-1
Item 21. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
Exhibit No. Document
----------- --------
1 Registration Rights Agreement dated as of November 14, 2001 between IPALCO
Enterprises, Inc. and Lehman Brothers Inc., ABN AMRO Incorporated, CIBC
World Markets Corporation, SG Cowen Securities Corporation, Merrill Lynch,
Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated and UBS Warburg LLC, as Placement
Agents
3.1 Certificate of Incorporation
3.2 By-Laws
4.1 Indenture, dated as of November 14, 2001 between IPALCO Enterprises, Inc.
and the Trustee
4.2 Pledge Agreement dated as of November 14, 2001 between IPALCO Enterprises,
Inc. and the Collateral Agent for the benefit of the Secured Parties
4.3 Mortgage and Deed of Trust, dated as of May 1, 1940, between Indianapolis
Power & Light Company and American National Bank & Trust Company of
Chicago, Trustee.
4.4 The following supplemental indentures to the Mortgage and Deed of Trust
referenced in 4.3 above:
Third Supplemental Indenture dated as of April 1, 1949
Tenth Supplemental Indenture dated as of October 1, 1960
Eighteenth Supplemental Indenture dated as of February 15, 1974
Thirty-Fourth Supplemental Indenture dated as of October 15, 1991
Thirty-Fifth Supplemental Indenture dated as of August 1, 1992
Thirty-Sixth Supplemental Indenture dated as of April 1, 1993
Thirty-Seventh Supplemental Indenture dated as of October 1, 1993
Thirty-Eighth Supplemental Indenture dated as of October 1, 1993
Thirty-Ninth Supplemental Indenture dated as of February 1, 1994
Fortieth Supplemental Indenture dated as of February 1, 1994
Forty-First Supplemental Indenture dated as of January 15, 1995
Forty-Second Supplemental Indenture dated as of October 1, 1995
Forty-Third Supplemental Indenture dated as of August 1, 2001
Forty-Fourth Supplemental Indenture dated as of August 1, 2001
Forty-Fifth Supplemental Indenture dated as of August 1, 2001
Forty-Sixth Supplemental Indenture dated as of August 1, 2001
4.5 Rights Agreement dated as of June 28, 1990, as amended and restated as of
April 28, 1998, between IPALCO Enterprises, Inc. and First Chicago Trust
Company of New York (Rights Agent)*
4.6 Amendment No. 1 dated as of July 15, 2000, to the Rights Agreement between
IPALCO Enterprises, Inc. and First Chicago Trust Company of New York
(Rights Agent)
5 Opinion of Davis Polk & Wardwell with respect to the new notes
10.1 Interconnection Agreement, dated December 30, 1960, between IPL and
Indiana & Michigan Electric Company (nka Indiana Michigan Power Company)
as modified through Modification 17 and Addendum V.
10.2 Interconnection Agreement dated May 1, 1992, among Indianapolis Power &
Light Company, PSI Energy, Inc. and CINERGY Services, Inc. as modified
through Amendment Number 9. (The Third Amendment amends and restates the
complete agreement between the parties.)
10.3 Interconnection Agreement dated December 2, 1969, between Indianapolis
Power & Light Company and Southern Indiana Gas and Electric Company as
modified through Modification Number 11.
10.4 Interconnection Agreement dated December 1, 1981, between Indianapolis
Power & Light Company and Hoosier Energy Rural Electric Cooperative, Inc.,
as modified through Modification 6.
10.5 Receivables Purchase Agreement between IPL and IPL Funding Corporation
dated December 20, 1996
10.6 Receivables Sale Agreement among IPL Funding Corporation as the Seller,
ABN AMRO Bank N.V., as the agent, the Liquidity Providers from time to
time party thereto, ABN AMRO Bank N.V. as the enhancer and Windmill
Funding Corporation dated as of December 20, 1996, together with annual
amendments from 1997 through 2001
10.7 Indemnity Agreement of December 20, 1996 between IPL and ABN AMRO Bank
N.V., as the agent
II-2
Exhibit No. Document
----------- --------
10.8 Subordination Agreement of December 20, 1996 between IPL, IPL Funding
Corporation and ABN AMRO Bank N.V., as the agent
10.9 Revolving Subordinated Promissory Note between IPL Funding Corporation and
IPL dated December 20, 1996.
10.10 Loan Agreement with ABN AMRO Bank N.V., Union Planters Bank National
Association, other Financial Institutions from time to time party thereto,
and ABN AMRO Bank N.V. as Administrative Agent, dated November 1, 2000,
for a $30 million line of credit, as amended October 31, 2000 and November
13, 2001
10.11 Remarketing Agreement between Indianapolis Power & Light Company and J.P.
Morgan Securities, Inc. dated June 15, 2001 for the remarketing of the
$40,000,000 City of Petersburg, Indiana, Pollution Control Refunding
Revenue Bonds, Adjustable Rate Tender Securities (ARTS), Series 1995B.
10.12 Credit Agreement by and among Indianapolis Power & Light Company and ABN
AMRO Bank, N.V. dated as of May 28, 1999, as amended July 31, 2001 and
November 13, 2001, which agreement serves as a liquidity facility for the
$40,000,000 City of Petersburg, Indiana, Pollution Control Refunding
Revenue Bonds, Adjustable Rate Tender Securities (ARTS), Series 1995B.
10.13 IPALCO Enterprises, Inc. 1990 Stock Option Plan
10.14 IPALCO Enterprises, Inc. 1991 Directors Stock Option Plan
10.15 IPALCO Enterprises, Inc. 1997 Stock Option Plan
10.16 IPALCO Enterprises, Inc. 1999 Stock Incentive Plan
12 Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
21 Subsidiaries of the Company
23.1 Consent of Davis Polk & Wardwell (contained in its opinion filed as
Exhibit 5.1).
23.2 Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP
24 Power of Attorney (included on signature page)
25 Statement of Eligibility of Bank One Trust Company, N.A., as Trustee, on
Form T-1.
99.1 Form of Letter of Transmittal
99.2 Form of Notice of Guaranteed Delivery
99.3 Form of Letter to Clients
99.4 Form of Letter to Nominees
99.5 Form of Instructions to Registered Holder and/or Book-Entry Transfer
Participant from Owner
---------------
* Incorporated by reference to the Registration Statement on Form 8-A/A of
IPALCO Enterprises, Inc. filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on April 29, 1998.
Financial Statement Schedules
[Enlarge/Download Table]
Schedule II--Valuation and Qualifying Accounts for the three years ended December 31, 2001
IPALCO Enterprises, Inc.
Balance at
beginning of Charged to Balance at
year income Deductions end of year
------------ ---------- ---------- -----------
For the year ended December 31, 2001
Allowance for doubtful accounts...................... 1,794 2,202 2,901 1,095
For the year ended December 31, 2000
Allowance for doubtful accounts...................... 1,360 2,451 2,017 1,794
For the year ended December 31, 1999
Allowance for doubtful accounts...................... 1,212 2,525 2,377 1,360
II-3
Indiana Power & Light Company
[Enlarge/Download Table]
Balance at
beginning of Charged to Balance at
year income Deductions end of year
------------ ---------- ---------- -----------
For the year ended December 31, 2001
Allowance for doubtful accounts...................... 1,608 2,358 2,901 1,065
For the year ended December 31, 2000
Allowance for doubtful accounts...................... 1,091 2,534 2,017 1,608
For the year ended December 31, 1999
Allowance for doubtful accounts...................... 996 2,472 2,377 1,091
Item 22. Undertakings
(a) The undersigned hereby undertakes:
(1) To file during any period in which offers or sales are being
made, a post-effective amendment to this registration statement:
(i) to include any prospectus required by Section 10(a)(3) of
the Securities Act of 1933;
(ii) to reflect in the prospectus any facts or events arising
after the effective date of the registration statement (or the most
recent post-effective amendment thereof) which, individually or in
the aggregate, represent a fundamental change in the information set
forth in the registration statement. Notwithstanding the foregoing,
any increase or decrease in the volume of securities offered (if the
total dollar value of securities offered would not exceed that which
was registered) and any deviation from the low or high end of the
estimated maximum offering range may be reflected in the form of
prospectus filed with the Commission pursuant to Rule 424(b) if, in
the aggregate, the changes in volume and price represent no more than
a 20 percent change in the maximum aggregate offering price set forth
in the "Calculation of Registration Fee" table in the effective
registration statement; and
II-4
(iii) to include any material information with respect to the
plan of distribution not previously disclosed in the registration
statement or any material change to such information in the
registration statement;
provided, however, that paragraphs (a)(1)(i) and (a)(1)(ii) do not
apply if the registration statement is on Form S-3, Form S-8 or Form
F-3, and the information required to be included in a post-effective
amendment by those paragraphs is contained in periodic reports filed
with or furnished to the Commission by the registrant pursuant to
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 that are
incorporated by reference in the registration statement.
(2) That, for the purpose of determining any liability under the
Securities Act of 1933, each such post-effective amendment shall be deemed to
be a new registration statement relating to the securities offered therein, and
the offering of such securities at that time shall be deemed to be the initial
bona fide offering thereof.
(3) To remove from registration by means of a post-effective
amendment any of the securities being registered which remain unsold at the
termination of the offering.
(b) Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the
Securities Act of 1933 may be permitted to our directors, officers and
controlling persons pursuant to the foregoing provisions, or otherwise, we have
been advised that in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange Commission such
indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Act and is,
therefore, unenforceable. In the event that a claim for indemnification against
such liabilities (other than the payment by us of expenses incurred or paid by
one of our directors, officers or controlling persons in the successful defense
of any action, suit or proceeding) is asserted by such director, officer or
controlling person in connection with the securities being registered, we will,
unless in the opinion of its counsel the matter has been settled by controlling
precedent, submit to a court of appropriate jurisdiction the question whether
such indemnification by it is against public policy as expressed in the Act and
will be governed by the final adjudication of such issue.
(c) The undersigned hereby undertakes to supply by means of a
post-effective amendment all information concerning a transaction that was not
the subject of and included in the registration statement when it became
effective.
II-5
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, IPALCO
ENTERPRISES, INC. has duly caused this registration statement to be signed on
its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in the City of
Indianapolis, State of Indiana on April 3, 2002.
IPALCO ENTERPRISES, INC.
By: /s/ Leonard M. Lee
--------------------------------
Name: Leonard M. Lee
Title: Chief Executive Officer
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature appears
below constitutes and appoints Leonard M. Lee and Hamsa Shadaksharappa, and
each of them, his or her true and lawful attorneys-in-fact and agents, with
full power of substitution and resubstitution, for him or her and in his or her
name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign any and all
amendments (including post-effective amendments) to this registration statement
and any and all additional registration statements pursuant to Rule 462(b) of
the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and to file the same, with all exhibits
thereto, and all other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities
and Exchange Commission, granting unto each said attorney-in-fact and agents
full power and authority to do and perform each and every act in person, hereby
ratifying and confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact and agents or either
of them or their or his or her substitute or substitutes may lawfully do or
cause to be done by virtue hereof.
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, this
registration statement has been signed by the following persons in the
capacities and on the dates indicated.
[Enlarge/Download Table]
Signature Title Date
--------- ----- ----
/s/ Leonard M. Lee
------------------------------- Chief Executive Officer; Director April 3, 2002
Leonard M. Lee
/s/ William R. Dodds
------------------------------- Vice-President, Secretary and Treasurer April 3, 2002
William R. Dodds (principal financial and accounting
officer)
/s/ Hamsa Shadaksharappa
------------------------------- Financial Services Business April 3, 2002
Hamsa Shadaksharappa Unit Leader
------------------------------- President; Director _______, 2002
William H. Henley
------------------------------- Director _______, 2002
Adrianne M. Horne
/s/ Sue A. Weaver
------------------------------- Director April 3, 2002
Sue A. Weaver
/s/ John Haarlow
------------------------------- Director April 3, 2002
John Haarlow
II-6
EXHIBIT INDEX
Exhibit No. Document
----------- --------
1 Registration Rights Agreement dated as of November 14, 2001 between IPALCO
Enterprises, Inc. and Lehman Brothers Inc., ABN AMRO Incorporated, CIBC
World Markets Corporation, SG Cowen Securities Corporation, Merrill Lynch,
Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated and UBS Warburg LLC, as Placement
Agents
3.1 Certificate of Incorporation
3.2 By-Laws
4.1 Indenture, dated as of November 14, 2001 between IPALCO Enterprises, Inc.
and the Trustee
4.2 Pledge Agreement dated as of November 14, 2001 between IPALCO Enterprises,
Inc. and the Collateral Agent for the benefit of the Secured Parties
4.3 Mortgage and Deed of Trust, dated as of May 1, 1940, between Indianapolis
Power & Light Company and American National Bank & Trust Company of
Chicago, Trustee.
4.4 The following supplemental indentures to the Mortgage and Deed of Trust
referenced in 4.3 above:
Third Supplemental Indenture dated as of April 1, 1949
Tenth Supplemental Indenture dated as of October 1, 1960
Eighteenth Supplemental Indenture dated as of February 15, 1974
Thirty-Fourth Supplemental Indenture dated as of October 15, 1991
Thirty-Fifth Supplemental Indenture dated as of August 1, 1992
Thirty-Sixth Supplemental Indenture dated as of April 1, 1993
Thirty-Seventh Supplemental Indenture dated as of October 1, 1993
Thirty-Eighth Supplemental Indenture dated as of October 1, 1993
Thirty-Ninth Supplemental Indenture dated as of February 1, 1994
Fortieth Supplemental Indenture dated as of February 1, 1994
Forty-First Supplemental Indenture dated as of January 15, 1995
Forty-Second Supplemental Indenture dated asof October 1, 1995
Forty-Third Supplemental Indenture dated as of August 1, 2001
Forty-Fourth Supplemental Indenture dated as of August 1, 2001
Forty-Fifth Supplemental Indenture dated as of August 1, 2001
Forty-Sixth Supplemental Indenture dated as of August 1, 2001
4.5 Rights Agreement dated as of June 28, 1990, as amended and restated as of
April 28, 1998, between IPALCO Enterprises, Inc. and First Chicago Trust
Company of New York (Rights Agent)*
4.6 Amendment No. 1 dated as of July 15, 2000, to the Rights Agreement between
IPALCO Enterprises, Inc. and First Chicago Trust Company of New York
(Rights Agent)
5 Opinion of Davis Polk & Wardwell with respect to the new notes
10.1 Interconnection Agreement, dated December 30, 1960, between IPL and
Indiana & Michigan Electric Company (nka Indiana Michigan Power Company)
as modified through Modification 17 and Addendum V.
10.2 Interconnection Agreement dated May 1, 1992, among Indianapolis Power &
Light Company, PSI Energy, Inc. and CINERGY Services, Inc. as modified
through Amendment Number 9. (The Third Amendment amends and restates the
complete agreement between the parties.)
10.3 Interconnection Agreement dated December 2, 1969, between Indianapolis
Power & Light Company and Southern Indiana Gas and Electric Company as
modified through Modification Number 11.
10.4 Interconnection Agreement dated December 1, 1981, between Indianapolis
Power & Light Company and Hoosier Energy Rural Electric Cooperative, Inc.,
as modified through Modification 6.
10.5 Receivables Purchase Agreement between IPL and IPL Funding Corporation
dated December 20, 1996
10.6 Receivables Sale Agreement among IPL Funding Corporation as the Seller,
ABN AMRO Bank N.V., as the agent, the Liquidity Providers from time to
time party thereto, ABN AMRO Bank N.V. as the enhancer and Windmill
Funding Corporation dated as of December 20, 1996, together with annual
amendments from 1997 through 2001
10.7 Indemnity Agreement of December 20, 1996 between IPL and ABN AMRO Bank
N.V., as the agent
II-7
Exhibit No. Document
----------- --------
10.8 Subordination Agreement of December 20, 1996 between IPL, IPL Funding
Corporation and ABN AMRO Bank N.V., as the agent
10.9 Revolving Subordinated Promissory Note between IPL Funding Corporation and
IPL dated December 20, 1996.
10.10 Loan Agreement with ABN AMRO Bank N.V., Union Planters Bank National
Association, other Financial Institutions from time to time party thereto,
and ABN AMRO Bank N.V. as Administrative Agent, dated November 1, 2000,
for a $30 million line of credit, as amended October 31, 2000 and November
13, 2001
10.11 Remarketing Agreement between Indianapolis Power & Light Company and J.P.
Morgan Securities, Inc. dated June 15, 2001 for the remarketing of the
$40,000,000 City of Petersburg, Indiana, Pollution Control Refunding
Revenue Bonds, Adjustable Rate Tender Securities (ARTS), Series 1995B.
10.12 Credit Agreement by and among Indianapolis Power & Light Company and ABN
AMRO Bank, N.V. dated as of May 28, 1999, as amended July 31, 2001 and
November 13, 2001, which agreement serves as a liquidity facility for the
$40,000,000 City of Petersburg, Indiana, Pollution Control Refunding
Revenue Bonds, Adjustable Rate Tender Securities (ARTS), Series 1995B.
10.13 IPALCO Enterprises, Inc. 1990 Stock Option Plan
10.14 IPALCO Enterprises, Inc. 1991 Directors Stock Option Plan
10.15 IPALCO Enterprises, Inc. 1997 Stock Option Plan
10.16 IPALCO Enterprises, Inc. 1999 Stock Incentive Plan
12 Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
21 Subsidiaries of the Company
23.1 Consent of Davis Polk & Wardwell (contained in its opinion filed as
Exhibit 5.1).
23.2 Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP
24 Power of Attorney (included on signature page)
25 Statement of Eligibility of Bank One Trust Company, N.A., as Trustee, on
Form T-1.
99.1 Form of Letter of Transmittal
99.2 Form of Notice of Guaranteed Delivery
99.3 Form of Letter to Clients
99.4 Form of Letter to Nominees
99.5 Form of Instructions to Registered Holder and/or Book-Entry Transfer
Participant from Owner
---------------
* Incorporated by reference to the Registration Statement on Form 8-A/A of
IPALCO Enterprises, Inc. filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on April 29, 1998.
II-8
Dates Referenced Herein and Documents Incorporated by Reference
↑Top
Filing Submission 0000950103-02-000333 – Alternative Formats (Word / Rich Text, HTML, Plain Text, et al.)
Copyright © 2024 Fran Finnegan & Company LLC – All Rights Reserved.
About — Privacy — Redactions — Help —
Sun., Apr. 28, 7:24:20.2am ET 
