SEC Info  
    Home      Search      My Interests      Help      Sign In      Please Sign In

Core Technologies Pennsylvania Inc – ‘PRER14C’ on 8/1/95

As of:  Tuesday, 8/1/95   ·   Accession #:  928816-95-36   ·   File #:  0-17577

Find Words in Filings emoji
 
  in    Show  and   Hints

  As Of                Filer                Filing    For·On·As Docs:Size              Issuer               Agent

 8/01/95  Core Techs Pennsylvania Inc       PRER14C                3:206K                                   McMunn Associates Inc/FA

Revised Preliminary Proxy Information Statement   —   Schedule 14C
Filing Table of Contents

Document/Exhibit                   Description                      Pages   Size 

 1: PRER14C     Revised Preliminary Information Statement             44±   208K 
 2: EX-99.1     Miscellaneous Exhibit                                 32±   146K 
 3: EX-99.2     Amendment #1                                           5±    19K 


PRER14C   —   Revised Preliminary Information Statement
Document Table of Contents

Page (sequential) | (alphabetic) Top
 
11st Page   -   Filing Submission
"Purchase Price
"Use of Proceeds
"Accounting Treatment
"Incorporation of Certain Documents by Reference


PRELIMINARY COPY CENTERCORE LOGO NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS TO BE HELD AUGUST 24, 1995 TO THE STOCKHOLDERS: NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of CenterCore, Inc. (the "Company") will be held at the offices of Maris Equipment Company, Inc. at 110 Summit Drive, Exton, PA 19341 on Thursday, August 24, 1995 at 9:00 a.m., local time, for the following purposes: 1. To elect three directors; 2. To consider and vote upon a proposal to amend the 1993 Stock Option Plan; 3. To consider and vote upon a proposal for the sale of substantially all of the assets of the Company's office furnishings business, including the office seating business operated by the Company's subsidiary, Corel Corporate Seating, Inc.; and 4. To transact such other business as may properly come before the meeting or any adjournment or adjournments thereof. The Board of Directors has established the close of business on June 27, 1995 as the record date for the determination of stockholders entitled to notice of and to vote at the meeting or any adjournments thereof. The accompanying Information Statement is furnished on behalf of the Board of Directors of the Company to provide notice of the Company's Annual Meeting of Stockholders. WE ARE NOT ASKING YOU FOR A PROXY AND YOU ARE REQUESTED NOT TO SEND US A PROXY. By order of the Board of Directors, GEORGE E. MITCHELL President and Chief Executive Officer 110 Summit Drive Exton, PA 19341 August , 1995 PRELIMINARY COPY CENTERCORE, INC. 110 Summit Drive Exton, PA 19341 WE ARE NOT ASKING YOU FOR A PROXY AND YOU ARE REQUESTED NOT TO SEND US A PROXY. INFORMATION STATEMENT This Information Statement is furnished on behalf of the Board of Directors of CenterCore, Inc. (the "Company") to provide notice of the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on August 24, 1995 (such meeting and any adjournment or adjournments thereof referred to as the "Annual Meeting") for the purposes set forth in the accompanying Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders and in this Information Statement. This Information Statement is being mailed to stockholders on or about August , 1995. Voting Securities Only the holders of shares of common stock, par value $.01 per share (the "Common Stock"), and Series A Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock, par value $.01 per share (the "Series A Shares"), of the Company of record at the close of business on June 27, 1995 (cumulatively, the "Shares") are entitled to receive notice of, and to vote at, the Annual Meeting. On that date, there were 10,437,326 shares of Common Stock and 15,000 Series A Shares outstanding and entitled to be voted at the Annual Meeting. Each share of Common Stock is entitled to vote for up to three persons as directors and to cast one vote on each other matter to be considered. Each Series A Share is entitled to cast one vote for each share of Common Stock into which such Series A Shares can be converted. At June 27, 1995, each Series A Share was convertible into 100 shares of Common Stock. The three nominees receiving the highest number of affirmative votes of the Shares present or represented and entitled to be voted shall be elected as directors. The approval of the adoption of the proposed amendment to the 1993 Stock Option Plan requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast at a meeting at which a quorum is present, either in person or by proxy, and voting on such amendment. Approval of the proposal to adopt a resolution for the sale of substantially all of the assets of the Company's office furnishings business, including the office seating business operated by the Company's subsidiary, Corel Corporate Seating, Inc., requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the outstanding Shares entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting. At June 27, 1995, Safeguard Scientifics (Delaware), Inc., the majority stockholder of the Company, was the holder of 6,744,757 shares of Common Stock and 15,000 Series A Shares and has advised the Company that it intends to vote its Shares in favor of the election of the named nominees and in favor of proposals 2 and 3. A majority of outstanding Shares will constitute a quorum for the transaction of business at the Annual Meeting. Votes withheld from any director, abstentions and broker non-votes will be counted for purposes of determining the presence of a quorum for the transaction of business at the Annual Meeting. Abstentions are counted in tabulations of the votes cast on proposals presented to stockholders. Broker non-votes are not counted for purposes of determining whether a proposal has been approved. Stockholder Proposals for 1996 Annual Meeting Stockholders intending to present proposals at the next Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held in 1996 must notify the Company of the proposal no later than March 8, 1996. Securities Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management The following table sets forth as of June 15, 1995, the Company's Common Stock beneficially owned by each person known to the Company to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of the outstanding Common Stock, and the number of shares of Common Stock owned beneficially by each director, by each named executive officer, and by all executive officers and directors as a group. In addition to the information regarding the Company's Common Stock listed below, as of June 15, 1995, there were 15,000 Series A Shares issued and outstanding. All of such Series A Shares are owned of record by Safeguard Scientifics (Delaware), Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Safeguard Scientifics, Inc. ("Safeguard"), and consequently are beneficially owned by Safeguard. The following table does not take into account the agreement of Safeguard to contribute 2,000,000 shares of Common Stock to the Company and to sell 2,500,000 shares of Common Stock to Company management. After consummation of these transactions, Safeguard's ownership will be reduced to 37.7% of the outstanding Common Stock, and the officers and directors as a group will own 36.8% of the outstanding Common Stock. Number of Percent of Shares Owned(1) Class --------------- ---------- Safeguard Scientifics, Inc. 800 The Safeguard Building 435 Devon Park Drive Wayne, PA 19087 (2) 8,244,757 69.1% George E. Mitchell (3) 651,250 6.2% 110 Summit Drive Exton, PA 19341 Anthony A. Nichols (4) 29,688 * Richard P. Richter (4) 5,100 * Michael H. Pelosi III(4) 47,500 * Officers and directors as a group (5 persons)(5) 801,038 7.6% ---------------- (*) Less than 1%. (1) Except as otherwise disclosed, the nature of beneficial ownership is the sole power to vote and to dispose of the shares (except for shares held jointly with spouse). (2) Safeguard Scientifics (Delaware), Inc. is the record owner of 6,744,757 shares of Common Stock and 15,000 Series A Shares, which are presently convertible into 1,500,000 shares of Common Stock. Such shares are beneficially owned by Safeguard. All of the shares beneficially owned by Safeguard have been pledged by Safeguard as collateral in connection with its bank line of credit. (3) Includes 300,000 shares of Common Stock held by Mr. Mitchell's spouse. (4) Includes for Messrs. Nichols, Richter and Pelosi 5,000 shares, 5,000 shares and 37,500 shares, respectively, which may be acquired pursuant to stock options which are currently exercisable or which will become exercisable by August 14, 1995. (5) Includes 115,000 shares which may be acquired pursuant to stock options which are currently exercisable or which will become exercisable by August 14, 1995. 1. ELECTION OF DIRECTORS The Board has nominated the individuals set forth below for election as directors of the Company, to hold office until the Annual Meeting of Stockholders in 1996 and until their successors are elected and have qualified. All of the nominees are presently serving as directors of the Company and have consented to serve if elected. [Enlarge/Download Table] Principal Occupation and Business Has Been a Name Experience During Last Five Years Director Since Age ---- --------------------------------- -------------- --- George E. Mitchell President, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company 1984 57 Anthony A. Nichols President, The Nichols Company, which owns, manages and leases commercial office and industrial space(1)(2) 1988 55 Richard P. Richter President Emeritus, Ursinus College(1)(3)(4) 1989 64 ---------- (1) Member of the Audit Committee. (2) Member of the Compensation Committee. (3) Member of the Stock Option Committee. (4) Prior to January 1995, Mr. Richter was President of Ursinus College. Committees and Meetings of the Board of Directors The Board of Directors held five meetings in 1994. The Company's Board of Directors has appointed standing Audit, Compensation and Stock Option Committees. The Audit Committee, which met once in 1994, is authorized to conduct such reviews and examinations as it deems necessary or desirable with respect to the practices and procedures of the independent accountants, the scope of the audit, accounting controls, practices and policies, the recommendation to the Board of the independent accountants to be selected, and the relationship between the Company and the independent accountants, including the availability of Company records, information and personnel. The Compensation Committee, which met once during 1994, fixes compensation levels, including incentive compensation for all officers and other principal employees. The Stock Option Committee, which administers the Company's stock option plans, did not meet during 1994. The Board does not have a Nominating Committee. All of the directors attended at least 75% of the Board and committee meetings of which they were members. Directors' Compensation Directors are elected annually and hold office until their successors are elected and have qualified or until their earlier resignation or removal. Directors who are not employees of the Company or Safeguard Scientifics, Inc. are paid a quarterly fee of $1,000 and $400 for each Board meeting attended, including committee meetings attended on a date other than a Board meeting date. The Company also maintains a stock option plan for Non-Employee Directors (the "Directors' Plan") which provides for the grant of options to directors not otherwise employed by the Company, its parent or any of its subsidiaries ("Eligible Director"). Each Eligible Director receives, as of the date such person first becomes an Eligible Director, an option to purchase 5,000 shares of the Company's Common Stock at an option exercise price equal to the asked price of the Common Stock on the date of grant as reported in the National Association of Securities Dealers Automated Quotations System. All options granted under the Directors' Plan vest in four equal annual installments beginning on the first anniversary of the date of option grant and have a term of seven years. No options were granted to or exercised by an Eligible Director during 1994. REPORT OF THE BOARD COMPENSATION COMMITTEE The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors (the "Committee") determines compensation levels, including incentive compensation, for the executives of the Company. Anthony A. Nichols is presently serving as the sole member of the Compensation Committee. Charles A. Root was a member of the Compensation Committee until his resignation from the Board of Directors in April 1995. Executive Compensation Policies The Company was and is in a highly competitive industry. In order to succeed, the Company believes that it must be able to attract and retain qualified executives, promote among them the economic benefits of stock ownership in the Company, and motivate and reward executives who, by their industry, loyalty and exceptional service, make contributions of special importance to the success of the business of the Company. The Company has structured its executive compensation program to support the strategic goals and objectives of the Company. Base compensation levels and benefits for executives generally had been set in previous years to be between the lower end and the midpoint of the scale of compensation paid by comparable companies in the Company's principal industry. Conversely, incentive programs were regarded to be above the midpoint of the scale in the industry. In pursuing this philosophy, the Company believed it could keep the fixed component of the compensation package at reasonable levels while incenting its key executives and managers to achieve better than average results. Therefore, the total cash compensation plan is made up of a lower base and higher incentive opportunity which in total would be competitive with comparable companies in the industry if the Company's objectives are achieved. For the purpose of establishing these levels, the Company had reviewed an evaluation by an independent compensation consultant of various published industry salary surveys. In setting executive compensation packages for 1994, the Committee considered an evaluation of executive compensation levels for comparably-sized companies in the electrical contracting industry, rather than in the office furnishings industry. Annual cash bonuses are based on return on assets and individual performance. At the beginning of each year, the Committee approves a target range of return on assets, and a range of potential bonus amounts for the chief executive officer and each other executive officer, stated as a percentage of base salary. Performance bonuses are awarded at year-end based on the actual return on assets compared to the target range of return on assets, and the achievement of individual objectives and individual contributions during the year to the achievement by the Company of its financial and strategic objectives as set forth in the Company's annual strategic plan. Grants of Company stock options are intended to align the interests of executives and key employees with the long-term interests of the Company's stockholders, and to encourage executives and key employees to remain in the Company's employ. Generally, grants are not made in every year, but are awarded subjectively based on a number of factors, including the pre-tax operating earnings of the Company, the individual's contributions to the achievement of the Company's financial and strategic objectives, and the amount and remaining term of options already held by an individual. The Stock Option Committee of the Board administers the Company's stock option plan. No options were granted by the Stock Option Committee to the Company's executive officers for services rendered in 1994. CEO Compensation The Compensation Committee authorized an increase in Mr. Mitchell's 1994 base salary to $140,000. However, based on the Company's performance during the first quarter and its cash flow problems, in April 1994, Mr. Mitchell initiated a 16% reduction in his salary in order to conserve Company resources. Since the Company failed to achieve the established target range of return on assets during 1994, no bonus was paid for 1994 to Mr. Mitchell. Other Executive Compensation The Compensation Committee re-set executive salaries for 1994 for certain executives based on its review of executive compensation in the electrical contracting industry. However, based on the Company's performance during the first quarter and its cash flow problems, in April and May 1994, all executives accepted salary reductions in order to conserve Company resources. Since the Company failed to achieve the established target range of return on assets during 1994, no bonuses were paid to any of the Company's executive officers for 1994. By the Compensation Committee: Anthony A. Nichols Summary Compensation of Executive Officers The following table sets forth information concerning compensation paid to the Chief Executive Officer and to each other person who was an executive officer of the Company at any time during 1994 and whose salary and bonus exceeded $100,000 in 1994. [Enlarge/Download Table] Summary Compensation Table --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Long Term Annual Compensation Compensation ------------------------------------------------ ------------ Awards ------------ Securities Other Annual Underlying All Other Compensation Options/ Compensa- Name and Principal Position Year Salary ($)(1) Bonus ($)(2) ($)(3) SARS (#) tion ($)(4) --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- George E. Mitchell, 1994 $125,354 $ 0 $ 13,816 0 $ 33,787 President, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer 1993 130,001 0 13,350 0 36,084 1992 129,000 129,000 10,795 0 33,141 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Michael H. Pelosi III, 1994 $130,961 $ 0 $ 0 0 $ 0 President, Airo Clean, Inc.(5) --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (1) Includes annual compensation which has been deferred by the named executives pursuant to the Company's 401(k) Tax Deferred Retirement and Incentive Plan ("401(k) Plan"). (2) A portion of the cash bonus listed above for services rendered in 1992 was paid in 1993. (3) Represents amounts reimbursed during the fiscal year for the payment of taxes. Perquisites and other personal benefits did not exceed the lesser of $50,000 or 10% of any executive officer's salary and bonus and accordingly have been omitted from the table as permitted by the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission. (4) The stated amounts for fiscal 1994 include the following amounts for each named executive officer: Company contributions under the 401(k) Plan -- Mr. Mitchell, $1,216; Mr. Pelosi, $0; term life and disability premiums -- Mr. Mitchell, $24,563; Mr. Pelosi, $0; current dollar value of benefits to the named executives of the remainder of split-dollar premiums paid by the Company -- Mr. Mitchell, $6,581; Mr. Pelosi, $0. (5) Mr. Pelosi was elected as an executive officer of the Company in mid-1994. Stock Options The Company did not grant any stock options or stock appreciation rights to its Chief Executive Officer or its other named executive officer during 1994. The following table sets forth information with respect to the number of unexercised options and the value of unexercised in-the-money options at December 31, 1994. [Enlarge/Download Table] Aggregated Option/SAR Exercises in Last Fiscal Year and FY-End Option/SAR Values --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Number of Securities Shares Underlying Unexercised Value of Unexercised Acquired Options/SARs at Fiscal in-the-Money Options/SARs on Year-End ($)(1) at Fiscal Year-End (#)(1) Exercise Value Name (#) Realized($) Exercisable Unexercisable Exercisable Unexercisable --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- George E. Mitchell 0 $ 0 0 0 $ 0 $ 0 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Michael H. Pelosi III 0 $ 0 27,500 17,500 $ 0 $ 0 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Employment Contracts and Termination of Employment and Change-in-Control Arrangements. In connection with the acquisition of the assets of Airo Clean Engineering, Inc. in 1993, Airo Clean, Inc. entered into a five-year employment agreement with Michael H. Pelosi III providing for his employment through February 1, 1998 as President of Airo Clean, Inc. at a minimum base salary of $100,000 per year, which was subsequently increased to $137,500 per year. The agreement also provided for Mr. Pelosi to receive an incentive payment each year equal to 3.75% of Airo Clean's net income, before allocated expenses and taxes, in excess of $150,000 per year. Airo Clean did not achieve this target in 1994, and consequently Mr. Pelosi did not receive any incentive payment for 1994. In May 1994, in recognition of the Company's liquidity problems, Mr. Pelosi accepted a temporary salary reduction for the balance of 1994 in order to conserve Company resources. Upon the termination of Mr. Pelosi's employment for reasons other than just cause or voluntary resignation, he will be entitled to receive an amount equal to his base salary for the balance of the term of the agreement. Pursuant to this agreement, Mr. Pelosi has agreed to refrain from competing with the Company until the earlier of February 1, 1998 or two years after the termination of his employment. STOCK PERFORMANCE GRAPH The following chart compares the cumulative total stockholder return on the Company's Common Stock for the period December 31, 1989 through December 31, 1994 with the cumulative total return on the NASDAQ Index and the cumulative total return for a peer group index for the same period. Because the Company has discontinued its furnishings operations, the Company has selected as a new peer group SIC Code 1731-- Electrical Contractors, which is the primary industry in which the Company is continuing to operate. The following table of numbers were used to generate the graphic chart in the printed piece. 200 180 160 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 CenterCore 100 49 49 55 73 39 NASDAQ 100 85 136 159 181 177 Peer Group 100 77 77 21 6 2 As required by the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission, the chart below compares the cumulative stockholder return on the Company's Common Stock with the cumulative total return on the NASDAQ Index and the peer group used in the chart presented in the Company's 1994 proxy statement. The peer group in this chart consists of SIC Code 252-- Office Furniture. The following table of numbers were used to generate the graphic chart in the printed piece. 200 180 160 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 CenterCore 100 49 49 55 73 39 NASDAQ 100 85 136 159 181 177 Peer Group 100 84 103 122 159 144 Each of the above charts assumes that $100 was invested on December 31, 1989 in the Company's Common Stock and in each of the comparison groups, and assumes reinvestment of dividends. CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS The Company and Safeguard are parties to an administrative services agreement pursuant to which Safeguard provides the Company with administrative support services for an annual fee and the reimbursement of certain out-of-pocket expenses incurred by Safeguard in performing services under the agreement. The administrative support services include consultation regarding the Company's general management, investor relations, financial management, human resources management, certain legal services, insurance programs administration, and tax research and planning. In conjunction with the Company refinancing its bank credit facility in March, 1994, the maximum annual administrative services fee was reduced to $300,000, retroactive to January 1, 1994, and was subordinated to the bank loan. The Company paid administrative services fees of $83,333 to Safeguard and accrued the remaining fees of $216,667 in 1994. The administration services agreement was terminated in 1995. However, Safeguard is providing certain administrative services to the Company at no charge in 1995. Maris Equipment Company, Inc., a subsidiary of the Company ("Maris"), rents 21,580 square feet of office space in Exton, Pennsylvania from Safeguard. The lease expired April 1995, and has been extended on a month-to-month basis. The Company pays monthly rental payments to Safeguard of $11,539 and a monthly operating expense allowance of $4,784, subject to adjustment based upon its proportionate share of actual operating expenses. The Company also is responsible for its proportionate share of utility charges and insurance for each of the leased premises. The Company intends to retain this lease as its corporate headquarters. The Company has advised that it believes the lease terms are no less favorable than could be obtained from an unrelated third party. The Company also rents 4,600 square feet of office space in Exton, Pennsylvania from Safeguard, which has served as its corporate headquarters. The lease expired May 6, 1995, and has been extended on a month-to-month basis. The Company pays monthly rental payments to Safeguard of $3,067. The Company also pays a monthly operating expense allowance of $1,303 subject to adjustment based upon its proportionate share of actual operating expenses. The Company intends to terminate this lease shortly. In September 1993, Safeguard loaned $1.1 million to the Company on a subordinated, unsecured basis to partially finance the Company's acquisition of Maris Equipment Company. In the fourth quarter of 1994, Safeguard contributed this loan to the capital of the Company. In March 1994, Safeguard guaranteed payment of up to a maximum of $940,000 under the Company's revolving credit agreement with Mellon Bank, subject to reduction or elimination upon the Company satisfying certain requirements imposed by the bank. In June 1994, Safeguard guaranteed an additional $1.5 million under the Company's credit facility with Mellon Bank. Safeguard received no monetary compensation for the extension of these guarantees. The Company has agreed to indemnify Safeguard against loss resulting from the above described guarantees. In June 1994, Safeguard purchased from the Company 15,000 shares of its Series A Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock ("Series A Shares") for an aggregate purchase price of $1.5 million. The Series A Shares are convertible into shares of Common Stock based on a conversion price of $1.00 per share of Common Stock. The conversion price and number of shares into which the Series A Shares may be converted are subject to anti-dilutive adjustments. The Series A Shares are entitled to a 6% per annum dividend payable out of legally available funds. Dividends which are not declared and paid will accumulate. No dividends have been declared to date. Unpaid undeclared cumulative dividends as of March 31, 1995 were $67,500. The Series A Shares are entitled to one vote for each share of Common Stock into which such Series A Shares may be converted. The Company may redeem the Series A Shares at any time after June 1, 1995 and must redeem all outstanding Series A Shares on June 1, 2001. In March 1995, the Company sold all of the capital stock of CenterCore Canada Limited to Safeguard for $10,000. CenterCore Canada had an intercompany liability to the Company of approximately $369,300, which liability survived the stock sale. Safeguard intends to cause CenterCore Canada to sell its assets, and to use the sale proceeds to satisfy its outstanding liabilities, including its liability to the Company. The purchase price for CenterCore Canada's assets is expected to be paid over time, and is not expected to be sufficient to satisfy all of CenterCore Canada's liabilities to the Company. The Company has established a reserve against the entire amount of this intercompany liability, and will treat any amounts collected as income at the time received. In 1995, Safeguard agreed to contribute 2,000,000 shares of the Company's Common Stock to the capital of the Company. Safeguard also agreed to sell to George E. Mitchell and certain other members of management an aggregate of 2,500,000 shares of the Company's Common Stock, at a price of $.10 per share, payable in the form of five-year, interest bearing promissory notes secured by 1,800,000 of the purchased shares. The parties estimated the fair market value of the shares to be $.10, taking into account a discount for lack of liquidity after the Common Stock of the Company was delisted from NASDAQ. Mr. Mitchell and the other management purchasers agreed to contribute 700,000 of such shares into escrow with the Company which the Company may redeem in order to satisfy exercises of options under the Company's 1993 Stock Option Plan when such exercises exceed 500,000 shares in the aggregate. Safeguard also has agreed to provide loans and/or loan guarantees to the Company for up to a maximum of $3 million, subject to certain conditions. In accordance with Safeguard's agreement, in April 1995, Safeguard pledged to the Company's bank a $1.5 million letter of credit to secure advances, if any, which the bank might make in excess of the Company's borrowing base formula. The Company has agreed to indemnify Safeguard against loss resulting from the pledge. In connection with the Airo Clean acquisition in 1993, Airo Clean, Inc. entered into a five-year employment agreement with Joseph P. Pelosi, the brother of Michael H. Pelosi, III. The agreement provides for a minimum annual base salary of $80,000, and provides for an incentive payment each year equal to 3.75% of Airo Clean's net income, before allocated expenses and taxes, in excess of $150,000. During 1994, the Company paid Joseph Pelosi $80,000 plus normal employee benefits. Also in connection with the Airo Clean acquisition, Airo Clean entered into a lease for approximately 15,300 square feet of flex office, warehouse and assembly space in Exton, PA from Michael Pelosi, Jr. and Lucille Pelosi, who are the parents of Michael H. Pelosi, III. The lease continues through December 2001. During 1994, Airo Clean paid $107,000 as rent to Mr. and Mrs. Pelosi, and also paid all operating expenses for the leased premises. The Company plans to consolidate Airo Clean's operations into Maris' facility and will attempt to sublet the space. 2. PROPOSAL TO APPROVE AN AMENDMENT TO THE 1993 STOCK OPTION PLAN Background At the Annual Meeting, the stockholders will be asked to approve an amendment to the Company's 1993 Stock Option Plan which was adopted by the Board, subject to stockholder approval, in May 1995. The 1993 Stock Option Plan, as proposed to be amended, is hereinafter referred to as the "1993 Plan." Proposed Amendment to the 1993 Plan The proposed amendment to the 1993 Plan authorizes an increase in the number of shares of Common Stock which may be issued upon exercise of options granted or to be granted under the 1993 Plan by 700,000 shares of Common Stock, from 500,000 to 1,200,000 shares of Common Stock in the aggregate. It is the Board's intention to issue options for an aggregate of approximately 700,000 shares to all employees, excluding the current executive officers, who remain in the Company's employ following the consummation of the transaction set forth in Proposal 3 herein. In connection with the sale by Safeguard to Company management of 2,500,000 shares of Common Stock, Company management has agreed that 700,000 of such shares will be held in escrow with the Company which the Company may redeem in order to satisfy exercises of options under the Company's 1993 Stock Option Plan when such exercises exceed 500,000 shares in the aggregate. Therefore, the additional 700,000 shares authorized for issuance under the Company's 1993 Plan will not be dilutive to existing stockholders of the Company. Approval by Stockholders Approval of the adoption of the amendment to the 1993 Plan requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast at a meeting at which a quorum representing a majority of all outstanding voting stock of the Company is present, either in person or by proxy, and voting on the 1993 Plan. If not so approved, then the 1993 Plan in the form as approved by the stockholders at the 1994 Annual Meeting will remain in full force and effect and the aggregate number of shares of Common Stock that are subject to options granted under the 1993 Plan will not exceed 500,000 shares of Common Stock. DESCRIPTION OF THE 1993 PLAN The following description of the 1993 Plan is intended merely as a summary of the principal features of the 1993 Plan. Purpose of the 1993 Plan The purpose of the 1993 Plan is to provide additional incentive to employees of the Company and its subsidiaries and to increase their proprietary interest in the success of the enterprise to the benefit of the Company and its stockholders. Shares Subject to the 1993 Plan Subject to the adjustment provisions discussed below, the maximum number of shares of Common Stock which may be issued under the 1993 Plan is 1,200,000. Such shares may be authorized but unissued shares of Common Stock or previously issued but reacquired shares of Common Stock. Shares subject to options which remain unexercised upon expiration, exchange of existing options, or earlier termination of such options will again become available for issuance in connection with stock options awarded under the 1993 Plan. On June 15, 1995, the average of the bid and asked prices as quoted by the market makers of the Company's Common Stock was $.125 per share. Administration The 1993 Plan is administered by the Stock Option Committee, which currently is composed of Director Richard P. Richter. The Stock Option Committee has the authority to interpret the 1993 Plan; to establish appropriate rules and regulations for the proper administration of the 1993 Plan; to select the persons to whom options should be granted; to determine the number of shares to be covered by such options, the times and dates at which such options shall be granted, and whether the options shall be incentive stock options ("ISO") or non-qualified stock options ("NQSO"); and generally to administer the 1993 Plan. Eligibility Employees (including any directors who are also employees) of the Company or of any subsidiary who are significant contributors to the business of the Company and its subsidiaries are eligible to participate in the 1993 Plan. On June 15, 1995, there were approximately 110 persons considered eligible to participate in the 1993 Plan. Stock Options The 1993 Plan requires that each optionee enter into a stock option agreement with the Company which incorporates the terms of the option and such other terms, conditions and restrictions, not inconsistent with the 1993 Plan, as the Stock Option Committee may determine. The option price will be determined by the Stock Option Committee, but may not, with respect to ISOs, be less than the greater of 100% of the fair market value of the optioned shares of Common Stock or the par value thereof on the date of grant. If the grantee of an ISO under the 1993 Plan owns more than 10% of the total combined voting power of all shares of stock of the Company or of any parent or subsidiary of the Company, the option price cannot be less than 110% of the fair market value at the date of grant and the term of such option cannot be more than five years. The term of any other option granted under the 1993 Plan may not exceed ten years. Options will become exercisable in such installments and on such dates as the Stock Option Committee may specify. The Stock Option Committee may accelerate the exercise date of any outstanding options, in its discretion, if it deems such acceleration desirable. Any option held by an individual who dies while employed by the Company or any subsidiary, or whose employment with the Company and all subsidiaries is terminated, prior to the expiration date of such option, will remain exercisable by the former employee or his personal representative for a period of time following the employee's termination of employment or death as provided for in the 1993 Plan and the applicable option agreement. Options are not transferable except at death. The 1993 Plan provides that the aggregate fair market value (determined as of the time the ISO is granted) of the shares with respect to which ISOs are exercisable for the first time by an optionee during any calendar year under the 1993 Plan and any other ISO plan of the Company, or any parent or subsidiary of the Company, cannot exceed $100,000. The option price is payable in cash or its equivalent or, in the discretion of the Stock Option Committee, (i) in shares of Common Stock of the Company previously acquired by the optionee, provided that if such shares were acquired through exercise of an ISO, such shares have been held by the optionee for a period of not less than the statutory holding periods described in the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code"), on the date of exercise (which as of June 15, 1995 are two years from the date of grant of the ISO and one year following the date of transfer of the shares to the optionee), or if such shares were acquired through exercise of an NQSO, such shares have been held by the optionee for a period of more than one year on the date of exercise and provided further that each optionee may use the procedure described in this clause (i) only once during any six-month period; (ii) by delivering a properly executed notice of exercise of the option to the Company and a broker, with irrevocable instructions to the broker to promptly sell the underlying shares of Common Stock and deliver to the Company the amount of sale proceeds necessary to pay the exercise price of the option; or (iii) by delivery of a full recourse promissory note. The Stock Option Committee also may elect to cash-out all or part of the portion of the option to be exercised by paying optionee an amount, in cash or stock, equal to the excess of the fair market value of the stock over the exercise price on the effective date of such cash-out. Adjustments Upon Changes in Capitalization, Mergers and Other Events The number of shares issuable under the 1993 Plan and upon the exercise of options outstanding thereunder, and the exercise price of such options, are subject to adjustment in the event of a stock split, stock dividend or similar change in the capitalization of the Company. In the event of a merger, consolidation or other specified corporate transactions, options will be assumed by the surviving or successor corporation, if any. However, in the event of such a corporate transaction, the 1993 Plan also authorizes the Stock Option Committee to terminate options to the extent they are not exercised prior to consummation of such a transaction, and to accelerate the vesting of options so that they are immediately exercisable prior to the consummation of the transaction. Duration and Amendment of the 1993 Plan The Board may amend or modify the 1993 Plan at any time, but no such amendment or modification, without the approval of the stockholders, shall (a) increase the amount of stock on which options may be granted, except pursuant to the adjustment provisions of the 1993 Plan, (b) change the provision relating to the eligibility of employees to whom options may be granted, or (c) materially increase the benefits accruing to participants under the 1993 Plan; provided, however, that no stockholder approval will be required for an amendment or modification pursuant to (a) and (b) above if the applicable sections of the Code, and rules and regulations thereunder governing incentive stock options, do not require stockholder approval and, provided further, that no stockholder approval will be required for an amendment or modification pursuant to (c) above if Rule 16b-3, or any successor provision promulgated pursuant to Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, does not require stockholder approval. The 1993 Plan will terminate on October 28, 2003 unless terminated earlier by the Board. No options may be granted after such termination, but options outstanding at the time of termination will remain exercisable in accordance with their terms. Federal Income Tax Consequences Based on the advice of counsel, the Company believes that the normal operation of the 1993 Plan should generally have, under the Code, and the regulations and rulings thereunder, all as in effect on June 15, 1995, the principal federal income tax consequences described below. Incentive Stock Options. If the requirements regarding ISOs set forth in the 1993 Plan are met, ISOs granted under the 1993 Plan will be afforded favorable federal income tax treatment under the Code. The optionee will not recognize taxable income and the Company will not be entitled to a deduction upon the grant of an ISO. Moreover, the optionee will not recognize taxable income (except alternative minimum taxable income, if applicable) and the Company will not be entitled to a deduction upon the exercise by the optionee of an ISO, provided the optionee was an employee of the Company or any of its subsidiary corporations, as defined in Section 424(f) of the Code, during the entire period from the date of grant of the ISO until three months before the date of exercise. If the employment requirements described above are not met, the tax consequences relating to NQSOs (discussed below) will apply. If the optionee disposes of the Common Stock acquired under an ISO after at least two years following the date of grant of the ISO and at least one year following the date of transfer of the Common Stock to the optionee following exercise of the ISO, the optionee will recognize a long-term capital gain or loss equal to the difference between the amount realized upon the disposition and the exercise price. Any net capital gain will be taxed at the ordinary income tax rates, but only up to a maximum rate of 28%. Any net capital loss can only be used to offset up to $3,000 per year ($1,500 per year in the case of a married individual filing separately) of ordinary income. If the optionee makes a disqualifying disposition of the Common Stock (that is, disposes of the Common Stock within two years after the date of grant of the ISO or within one year after the transfer of the Common Stock to the optionee), but all other requirements of Section 422 of the Code are met, the optionee will generally recognize ordinary income upon disposition of the Common Stock in an amount equal to the lesser of (i) the fair market value of the Common Stock on the date of exercise minus the exercise price, or (ii) the amount realized on disposition minus the exercise price. However, in the case of a disqualifying disposition made less than six months after the date of grant of the option by a person subject to Section 16(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the determination of ordinary income under (i) above will generally be based on the fair market value of the Common Shares as of the date which is six months following the date the ISO was granted, unless the optionee makes an election under Section 83(b) of the Code. Disqualifying dispositions of Common Stock also may, depending upon the sales price, result in either long-term or short-term capital gain or loss under the Code rules which govern other stock dispositions. If the requirements of Section 422 of the Code are not met, the Company will be allowed a federal income tax deduction to the extent of the ordinary income includible in the optionee's gross income in accordance with the provisions of Section 83 of the Code (and Section 3402 of the Code, to the extent applicable) and the regulations thereunder. The use of Common Stock received upon the exercise of an ISO to pay the exercise price in connection with the exercise of other ISOs within either the two-year or one-year holding periods described above will constitute a disqualifying disposition of the Common Stock so used which will result in income (or loss) to the optionee and, to the extent of a recognized gain, a deduction to the Company. If, however, these holding period requirements are met and the number of shares of Common Stock received on the exercise does not exceed the number of shares of Common Stock surrendered, the optionee will recognize no gain or loss with respect to the surrendered Common Stock, and will have the same basis and holding period with respect to the newly acquired shares of Common Stock as with respect to the surrendered shares. To the extent that the number of shares of Common Stock received exceeds the number surrendered, the optionee's basis in such excess shares will equal the amount of cash paid by the optionee upon the exercise of the option, and the optionee's holding period with respect to such excess shares will begin on the date such shares are transferred to the optionee. The tax treatment described above for shares of Common Stock newly received upon exercise is not affected by using shares of Common Stock to pay the exercise price. Non-qualified Options All other options granted under the 1993 Plan are NQSOs and will not qualify for any special tax benefits to the optionee. Under present Treasury Regulations, the Company's stock options are not deemed to have a readily ascertainable value. Accordingly, an optionee will not recognize any taxable income at the time he or she is granted an NQSO and the Company will not be entitled to a deduction upon the grant of an NQSO. Generally, an optionee will recognize ordinary income at the time of exercise of an NQSO, in an amount equal to the excess of the fair market value of the shares of Common Stock at the time of such exercise over the exercise price. If, however, an optionee who is subject to Section 16(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 exercises an NQSO less than six months after the date it is granted, he or she will generally recognize ordinary income six months after the NQSO is granted, unless he or she makes an election under Section 83(b) of the Code to recognize income at an earlier date. The Company will be entitled to a deduction to the extent of the ordinary income recognized by an optionee in accordance with the rules of Section 83 of the Code and the regulations thereunder. However, no deduction will generally be allowed to the Company unless the Company deducts and withholds federal income tax. An optionee exercising an NQSO is subject to federal income tax on the income recognized as a result of the exercise of an NQSO and federal Income tax must be withheld. The Committee, in its discretion, may permit the optionee to elect to surrender or deliver shares of Common Stock otherwise issuable upon exercise, or previously acquired shares, in order to satisfy the federal income tax withholding, subject to certain restrictions set forth in the 1993 Plan. Such an election will result in a disposition of the shares of Common Stock which are surrendered or delivered, and an amount will be included in the optionee's income equal to the excess of the fair market value of such shares over the optionee's basis in such shares. If the optionee pays the exercise price in cash, the basis of the shares of Common Stock received by an optionee upon the exercise of an NQSO is the exercise price paid plus the amount recognized by the optionee as income attributable to such shares upon such exercise. If the exercise price is paid in cash, the optionee's holding period for such shares will begin on the day after the date on which the optionee realized income with respect to the transfer of such option shares, i.e., generally the day after the exercise date. Any net capital gain realized by the optionee upon a subsequent disposition of any such shares is subject to federal income tax on the income recognized at the ordinary income tax rates, but only up to a maximum of 28%. Any loss realized on a subsequent disposition, however, will be treated as a capital loss and thus can only be used to offset up to $3,000 per year ($1,500 in the case of a married individual filing separately) of ordinary income. If the optionee surrenders shares of Common Stock to pay the exercise price, and the number of shares received on the exercise does not exceed the number of shares surrendered, the optionee will recognize no gain or loss with respect to the surrendered shares, and will have the same basis and holding period with respect to the newly acquired shares as with respect to the surrendered shares. To the extent that the number of shares of Common Stock received exceeds the number surrendered, the fair market value of such excess shares on the date of exercise, reduced by any cash paid by the optionee upon such exercise, will be includible in the gross income of the optionee. The optionee's basis in such excess shares will equal the sum of the cash paid by the optionee upon the exercise of the option plus any amount included in the optionee's gross income as a result of the exercise of the option and the optionee's holding period with respect to such excess shares will begin on the day following the date of exercise. Other Tax Considerations The 1993 Plan is not qualified under Section 401(a) of the Code and is not subject to the provisions of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended to date. The comments set forth in the above paragraphs are only a summary of certain of the federal income tax consequences relating to the 1993 Plan. No consideration has been given to the effects of state, local and other tax laws on the optionee or the Company. NEW PLAN BENEFITS The following table sets forth information with respect to the number of options which were granted or which are expected to be granted to each of the named individuals or groups under the 1993 Plan subject to stockholder approval at the Annual Meeting of the proposal contained in Proposal 2 above. The options set forth in this table will be rescinded if such stockholder approval is not obtained. Name and Position (1) Number of Options Dollar Value ($)(2) --------------------- ----------------- ------------------- George E. Mitchell, President and Chief Executive Officer 0 0 Michael H. Pelosi III, President Airo Clean, Inc. 0 0 Executive Officers as a Group 0 0 Non-Executive Officer Employees as a Group 700,000 0 (1) Non-Employee Directors have been excluded from the above table as they are not eligible to participate in the 1993 Plan. (2) All options granted under the 1993 Plan have an exercise price equal to or greater than the fair market value of the Common Stock on the date of grant. As optionees must pay the exercise price to the Copmany to acquire the shares upon exercise of the option, the dollar value of benefits received by or allocated to the optionees on the grant date was zero. 3. APPROVAL OF THE SALE OF THE OFFICE FURNISHINGS BUSINESS Description of the Company and the Purchaser Prior to 1993, the Company was engaged solely in the business of designing, manufacturing and distributing space-efficient, modular workstation systems and a line of complementary office products, including cable and wiring systems, ergonomically designed seating products, and air management systems for temperature blending and breathing zone filtration (collectively, the "Furnishings Business"). The Company conducted the Furnishings Business directly, and through its 90% owned subsidiary, Corel Corporate Seating, Inc. ("Corel"). In February 1993, the Company, through a subsidiary, acquired the assets and assumed the liabilities of Airo Clean Engineering, Inc., a designer and manufacturer of cleanroom and air filtration components and systems serving industry and the hospital and health care markets. In September 1993, the Company, through a subsidiary, purchased substantially all of the assets and assumed certain liabilities of Maris Equipment Company, a specialty contractor providing integration, installation and servicing of advanced electronic systems for security access control, fire alarm, sound, communications and other applications on a nationwide basis. Maris provides these services to business, aviation and transportation authorities and correctional facilities. The principal executive offices of the Company are located at 110 Summit Drive, Exton, PA 19341, and its telephone number is (610) 524-7000. The CenterCore Group, Inc. ("CGI") is a Delaware corporation which was organized for the sole purpose of acquiring the assets of the Company's Furnishings Business. CGI was organized by The Apollo Group, Inc. ("Apollo"), a private investment group specializing in the acquisition and continued management of established manufacturing companies. Apollo was founded in 1983, and has participated in the acquisition and management of 12 small to middle market size operating companies. The principal executive offices of Apollo are located at One Captain Thomson Lane, Hingham, MA 02043, and its telephone number is (617) 740-0460. Neither CGI, Apollo nor its principals are affiliated with the Company, and neither the Company nor any of its current executive officers, directors, nor controlling persons has any ownership interest in CGI. A former executive officer of the Company will become employed by CGI upon consummation of the sale, and may be granted an equity interest in CGI. Background and Reasons for Sale The Company's acquisitions of Airo Clean and Maris were part of an overall strategy to improve the Company's operating performance by penetrating new and growing markets to compensate for the steady decline in Furnishings Business sales to the federal government, particularly the Department of Defense. Furnishings Business sales to the federal government decreased from $28 million in 1992 to $18.9 million in 1993 and $15.2 million in 1994. The reduced government sales have had a major impact on the Company's Furnishings Business in recent years, and the outlook for furnishings sales to the federal government continues to be uncertain. This decline has been caused by a general decline in government purchases due to downsizing, and by the increasing participation of the Federal Prison Industries in the sale of furnishings products to the government pursuant to preferences granted to it. The Company has also attempted to offset the reduced government sales by increasing its marketing efforts to the commercial sector. However, the commercial furnishings market is highly competitive, with participants who are substantially larger than the Company with much greater resources. In light of industry rightsizing and downsizing limiting overall demand for new office furnishings, it has become more difficult for niche players such as the Company to successfully compete in the commercial marketplace. The Company also attempted in 1993 to improve performance by significantly downsizing its Canadian operations and consolidating most of the manufacturing, product development, marketing and service functions into its domestic furnishings operations based in Plainfield, New Jersey. However, foreign sales declined from $5.2 million in 1993 to $3.4 million in 1994, and the Company determined in 1994 to dispose of its remaining Canadian manufacturing operations. Despite these measures, the Furnishings Business' manufacturing overhead costs were not reduced as fast as sales. This factor combined with increasing competitive pricing pressures in the commercial market, caused a reduction in gross profit margins in the company's furnishings business (domestic and foreign) from 39.3% in 1992 to 36.4% in 1993 and 33.5% in 1994. Net income before tax for the Company's furnishings business (domestic and foreign) went from earnings of $1.2 million in 1992 to losses of $0.7 million in 1993 and $1.7 million in 1994. In order to better meet its working capital needs, the Company refinanced and increased its bank credit facility with a new bank in March 1994. Safeguard Scientifics, Inc. ("Safeguard"), the Company's majority stockholder, supported the refinancing by providing $2.4 million of guarantees to the new bank. Safeguard had previously supported the Company's acquisition of Maris by providing a $1.1 million subordinated loan to the Company. In June 1994, the Company raised an additional $1.5 million of capital through the issuance of preferred stock to Safeguard. However, the Company realized a net loss of $15.4 million in 1994 resulting primarily from unanticipated costs and operating difficulties associated with certain large, bonded correctional facility and airport construction contracts acquired in the Maris acquisition. As a result of these losses, the Company has suffered a severe liquidity problem in that it was unable to pay its vendors on a timely basis, was having difficulty completing work in progress, and defaulted on certain financial covenants under its bank loan agreement. In August 1994, Safeguard informed the Company that it would not continue to provide ongoing financial support to the Company. As a result, the Company's management and Board of Directors considered a number of alternative possible means of resolving its liquidity and operating problems. The alternatives considered included a sale of the Furnishings Business, a sale of the security systems business, an action for recission against the seller of Maris on the basis of substantial apparent misrepresentations and breaches of warranties, or a reorganization in bankruptcy. A bankruptcy reorganization was rejected because of the damage it would do to the Company's employees, customers, vendors, and lenders. An action for recission of the Maris acquisition was considered unfeasible because of the time, expense and uncertainty of success involved in such an action. As between a sale of the Furnishings Business and a sale of the security systems business, management and the Board concluded that if the Company could settle its outstanding liabilities relating to Maris' large bonded projects and to Maris' seller, Maris has the potential to realize significant future growth in the business of providing low voltage electronic security systems for smaller commercial projects and for "smart highway" projects. The future potential of the Furnishings Business was considered to be less bright. Therefore, the Board of Directors determined to pursue a sale of the Furnishings Business in order to pay down the Company's bank debt as quickly as possible and to pursue settlements of Maris' outstanding liabilities. Safeguard supported this decision by contributing its $1.1 million subordinated note to the capital of the Company in December 1994 and by agreeing to provide the Company with up to $3 million of additional credit to fund the Company's negotiations relating to the sale of the Furnishings Business, the settlement of Maris' outstanding liabilities, and the Company's continuing working capital needs in addition to its available bank credit facility. Because of the Company's decision, supported by its majority stockholder, to sell its Furnishings Business, the Company has classified its Furnishings Business as discontinued operations. The Company's management and directors, assisted by Safeguard, began to pursue a sale of the Furnishings Business in August 1994. In November 1994, the Company engaged Stump & Company ("Stump"), a business broker and financial advisor specializing in the furniture industry, to act as its exclusive financial advisor to assist in the sale of the Furnishings Business. While the Company was pursuing a sale, the management of the Furnishings Business based in Plainfield, New Jersey (the "MBO Group") indicated an interest in pursuing a management buyout of the Furnishings Business. The members of the Company's Board indicated a willingness to consider an offer from the MBO Group, and directed Stump to also pursue equity sources who would be willing to support such an offer. However, in order to motivate the MBO Group to respond fairly to inquiries from other buyers, the Company committed to pay to the MBO Group a bonus in the aggregate amount of $85,000 if a sale of the Furnishings Business is consummated to a buyer other than the MBO Group. Stump conducted a broad search of strategic buyers within the furniture business, operating buyout specialists, and equity sources to support an MBO Group buyout. Stump contacted a total of 55 entities. Stump qualified a number of potential buyers, who were then given access to information about the Furnishings Business to perform their due diligence. As a result, the Company received indications of interest from five entities, although none from equity sources willing to finance an offer from the MBO Group. During the course of the process, Apollo was introduced to Stump. Stump performed an initial due diligence check on Apollo, and in early December 1994 provided Apollo with information about the Furnishings Business. On December 12, 1994, Apollo made a due diligence visit to the Company's Plainfield plant. On January 4, 1995, representatives of Apollo met with management and directors of the Company and executives of Safeguard, and presented their first proposal for a purchase of the Furnishings Business. The proposal provided for the purchase of substantially all of the domestic assets of the Furnishings Business for a cash payment at closing, additional installment payments beginning 9 months after closing, and a subordinated promissory note payable in installments beginning approximately two years after closing. The amount of each of the payments was to be determined by a formula based on the working capital of the Furnishings Business at the time of closing. Apollo would assume only certain liabilities associated with the ongoing operations of the Furnishings Business, would not purchase any of the foreign assets, and would require the Company and Safeguard to provide certain indemnities against undisclosed liabilities, particularly with respect to any environmental liabilities. Representatives of the Company, Safeguard and Apollo negotiated Apollo's proposal during the meeting and during the following week. As a result of the negotiations, the Company's directors and senior management, in consultation with executives of Safeguard, determined that Apollo's offer was more favorable than the other offers the Company had received or was likely to receive. It was believed that Stump had done a thorough job of identifying potential acquirers, and only a relatively small number of them had presented a realistic purchase offer. Apollo's offer was the highest bid. Apollo's offer provided a significant up front cash payment which could be used to pay down the Company's bank debt. It was also believed that Apollo had the necessary management expertise and experience to restructure and operate the Furnishings Business profitably, which would enable it to pay the deferred purchase price. Apollo also indicated that it would offer the MBO Group the opportunity to acquire up to a 20% equity interest in the acquiring entity. This was significantly greater than the percentage interest which any other bidder had been willing to offer, and was considered to be a positive factor. The major areas of negotiation involved the priority and limits of Safeguard's and the Company's indemnities to Apollo, the fair value of the fixed assets to be included in the sale, the definition of working capital for purposes of calculating the various purchase price payments, the terms of the deferred purchase price payments, and the rights of offset of Apollo's right to indemnity against the deferred payments. On January 11, 1995, the Company, Safeguard and Apollo signed a letter of intent for the sale of the Furnishings Business to Apollo ("the Sale Transaction"). The letter of intent was conditioned on satisfactory completion of Apollo's due diligence investigation, Apollo obtaining financing for the acquisition, satisfactory resolution of the state environmental review of the sale required because of the transfer of the lease of the manufacturing facility in Plainfield, New Jersey, and execution of a mutually agreeable definitive purchase agreement. The letter of intent was renegotiated in early March 1995, and an amendment was executed on March 13, 1995. The Company's counsel prepared a draft purchase agreement, and representatives of the Company, Safeguard and Apollo and their respective counsel pursued extensive negotiations on the terms of the purchase agreement. The Company and Safeguard used common counsel in the negotiations. Finally, on May 26, 1995, the Company, Safeguard and Apollo entered into a definitive Asset Purchase Agreement. The Asset Purchase Agreement is contingent on a number of conditions, including approval of the stockholders of the Company and satisfactory resolution of the state environmental review of the sale. The terms and conditions of the purchase agreement are described in more detail below under "Summary of the Terms of the Sale." The Company's Board of Directors determined that the sale is in the best interests of the Company's stockholders and approved the purchase agreement on May 26, 1995. The Board of Corel and the Company, as majority stockholder of Corel, have also approved the purchase agreement on behalf of Corel. Due to delays beyond the originally anticipated closing date, the parties negotiated and entered into an amendment to the Asset Purchase Agreement providing for (i) Apollo to assume managerial operation of the Furnishings Business, subject to the control of Company management, commencing July 1, 1995; (ii) the Company to pay Apollo 1.5% of revenues of the Furnishings Business from July 1, 1995 through the Closing or termination of the agreement; (iii) the revision of timing and number of installment payments of the deferred portion of the purchase price; and (iv) the extension of the agreement until August 25, 1995. As used below, the term "Asset Purchase Agreement" includes the above-described amendment. Summary of Terms of the Sale Transaction Business to be Sold The Company is selling all of its domestic Furnishings Business to Apollo. This business includes CenterCore's modular, configured furniture systems business as well as the commercial and industrial seating business of its subsidiary Corel. After the sale of the Furnishings Business, the Company will continue to operate its security and control system integration and installation business through its subsidiary Maris and its indoor air quality and hospital/healthcare environmental control business through its subsidiary Airo Clean. Maris will focus on providing fire alarm systems, closed circuit television surveillance systems, card access security systems, and other systems to the commercial and institutional markets. Maris no longer intends to pursue large, bonded correctional facility and airport jobs. Airo Clean will continue its business substantially as it has operated since the Company acquired Airo Clean, except that the sales and marketing functions will no longer be coordinated with the Furnishings Business. Because all of the proceeds of the sale will be used to repay outstanding bank debt (see "Use of Proceeds" below), the Company will rely on operating cash flow and advances from Safeguard, together with financing from the Company's Bank, if any is available, to fund its continuing operations. The assets to be sold include accounts receivable, furniture, fixtures, machinery and equipment, intellectual property (including rights to the name "CenterCore"), inventory, real property leases, leasehold improvements, and outstanding dealer agreements, government supply contracts, and other agreements. As a part of the sale, the Company and Apollo will grant to each other royalty-free licenses (the "License Agreements") to use certain patents and trademarks relating to air circulation and filtration products which are currently marketed by both CenterCore and Airo Clean. Apollo will have the right to market the products in all places where contract furniture may be sold, and the Company will have the right to market the products in hospital and industrial cleanroom applications, except where Apollo may sell contract furniture. The following is a summary of the terms of the Asset Purchase Agreement, which has been filed by the Company as an exhibit to the preliminary copy of this Information Statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC"), and reference is hereby made thereto for a complete description of the respective terms. All statements herein are qualified in their entirety by reference to the Asset Purchase Agreement. Copies of such agreements are available from the Company free of charge upon written request. See "Incorporation of Certain Documents by Reference." Purchase Price The purchase price (the "Purchase Price") for the Furnishings Business is comprised of three components: cash consideration (the "Cash Consideration") of $2.5 million less the amount, if any, by which the Company's working capital (defined as accounts receivable plus inventory minus accounts payable) is less than $5 million (the "Working Capital Deficit"); installment payments equal to the sum of $1 million, plus the amount of the Company's accounts receivable at Closing less assumed liabilities at Closing, plus one-half the excess of the amount of inventory at Closing over $1 million, less the Cash Consideration (the "Installment Payments"); and a subordinated note component which is equal to one-half of the difference between the amount of inventory at Closing less $1 million, less any excess inventory reserve at Closing, plus $1.065 million plus or minus certain capital expenditures, plus the Company's security deposits and pre-paid expenses at Closing (the "Subordinated Note Component"). Assuming an August 25, 1995 closing, based on the Company's current best estimate of the assets and liabilities which will be sold to Apollo, the Cash Consideration will be approximately $2.5 million, the aggregate Installment Payments will be approximately $2 million, and the principal amount of the Subordinated Note will be approximately $2 million for an aggregate Purchase Price of approximately $6.5 million. The Company estimates that the actual aggregate purchase price could vary by up to $500,000 in either direction. However, because the Purchase Price is dependent principally on accounts receivable, accounts payable and inventories, any Purchase Price variation is likely to be substantially offset by an opposite variation in the amount of cash flow realized by the Company through the Closing Date. The Cash Consideration is to paid at Closing with any Working Capital Deficit to be determined, preliminarily, based on a preliminary pro forma closing date balance sheet (the "Preliminary Balance Sheet") prepared by the Company reflecting only the assets and liabilities of the Company being sold to and assumed by Apollo. The Cash Consideration will be adjusted, as required, after Closing based on the actual Working Capital Deficit, if any. The Installment Payments are to be made in four payments with the first installment for one-fifth of the total amount payable nine months after the Closing Date. The remaining three installments will be in equal amounts, and will be due on June 30, 1996, September 30, 1996 and December 31, 1996. The Installment Payments will be non-interest bearing and secured by a second lien on all of Apollo's assets. The Subordinated Note Component will be evidenced by Apollo's subordinated note (the "Subordinated Note") which will bear interest at the rate of 8% per annum, commencing to accrue on the first anniversary of the Closing Date. The principal amount of the Subordinated Note will be amortized on a seven year level schedule with semi-annual payments and with a balloon payment due on the fifth anniversary of the Closing Date. Interest and principal payments will commence 18 months after the Closing Date and continue semi-annually thereafter until maturity. In the event that Buyer's EBITAD (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization) exceeds $2 million dollars for any fiscal year prior to repayment of the Subordinated Note, an additional principal payment equal to 50% of such excess shall be payable by Apollo and applied against the Subordinated Note in the inverse order of maturity. The Subordinated Note will be subordinated to the Company's senior debt and will be secured by a second lien on all of the Company's fixed assets purchased by Apollo. At Closing, the Company is required to deliver to Apollo the Preliminary Balance Sheet reflecting all of the assets which would be purchased by Apollo and all of the liabilities which would be assumed by Apollo as of the last day of the month preceding the month in which Closing occurs with the assets and liabilities determined assuming that Closing occurred on such date. The Preliminary Balance Sheet will be used to compute the Cash Consideration payable at Closing and the principal amount of the Subordinated Note to be delivered at Closing. Within 30 days following Closing, the Company, at its expense, must prepare and deliver to Buyer a pro forma Closing Date balance sheet reflecting all of the assets purchased and liabilities assumed by Apollo as of the Closing Date which is to be prepared, in so far as is possible, in accordance with generally accepted accounting principals consistently applied (the "Closing Balance Sheet"). Simultaneously, the Company is to deliver its computation of the Working Capital Deficit for purposes of computing the Cash Consideration, the amount of the Installment Payments and the actual principal amount of the Subordinated Note (collectively, the "Computed Items"). The Closing Balance Sheet and the Computed Items are to become final and binding upon the parties unless Apollo gives written notice of its disagreement to the Company within 20 days following delivery to it of the Closing Balance Sheet setting forth in reasonable detail the nature of any disagreements so asserted. During the first 10 days following receipt of any notice of disagreement, the parties are to attempt to resolve in writing any differences they have. If at the end of the 10 day period, the parties have reached such written agreement, the Closing Balance Sheet and Computed Items are to be adjusted to reflect such written agreement and thereafter shall become final and binding on the parties. If at the end of the 10 day period the parties have failed to reach agreement, all disputed matters shall be resolved by an arbitrator which shall be any of the so called "Big Six" accounting firms agreed upon by the Company and Apollo other than KPMG Peat Marwick. The determination of the arbitrator will be final and binding on the Company and Apollo and will control the determination of the Closing Balance Sheet and the Computed Items. At such time as the Closing Balance Sheet and the Computed Items are finally determined, the various components of the Purchase Price are to be recomputed. Specifically, the actual Cash Consideration shall be recomputed using the actual Working Capital Deficit, with any excess refunded by the Company to Apollo, and any deficit paid by Apollo to the Company, in either case within five days of the final determination of the Closing Balance Sheet. In addition, if based on the Closing Balance Sheet and the Computed Items, the principal amount of the Subordinated Note differs from that computed based on the Preliminary Balance Sheet, the Seller will surrender for cancellation the Subordinated Note delivered at Closing in return for a new Subordinated Note with a principal amount based determined on the Closing Balance Sheet. At Closing, Apollo will assume certain liabilities of the Company including all accounts payable, commissions payable, prospective warranty obligations, outstanding purchase orders and outstanding customer sales contracts and obligations under certain real and personal property leases. Name Change At the time of the Closing, the Company will change its name from CenterCore, Inc. to Core Technologies, Inc. This name change was approved by the Company's stockholders at the 1994 annual stockholders meeting. Representations, Warranties and Indemnities In the Asset Purchase Agreement, the Company is making customary representations and warranties to Apollo including as to the Company's financial and other information filed with the SEC, tax matters, environmental matters, pending or threatened litigation affecting the Company, compliance with applicable laws, title to the Company's assets, third party approvals, status of employee benefit plans and employee compensation arrangements, accounts receivable, intellectual property, absence of changes, and labor relations. In the Asset Purchase Agreement, Apollo is making customary representations and warranties to the Company including third party approvals and existing and pending litigation. The Asset Purchase Agreement also provides customary indemnification obligations. Specifically, each of the parties has agreed to indemnify the other in connection with inaccuracies, breaches and non-fulfillment of any of the representations and warranties made, and covenants and agreements to be performed prior to Closing, by the Company or Apollo (which have varying periods of survival ranging from 24 months following Closing to unlimited survival). The Company has also agreed to indemnify Apollo in connection with any retained liabilities, and Apollo has agreed to indemnify the Company in connection with any assumed liabilities. The Asset Purchase Agreement provides generally that a minimum of $50,000 in damages must be sustained before seeking recovery pursuant to the indemnifications provisions and that no party will be obligated to pay more for indemnification than an amount equal to the Purchase Price. The Asset Purchase Agreement provides that Apollo will have the right to offset the Company's indemnification obligations against the Installment Payments and/or the payments payable under the Subordinated Notes subject to certain terms and conditions. Closing Conditions. The obligations of the Company and Apollo to consummate the transactions as contemplated by the Asset Purchase Agreement are subject to the satisfaction or waiver of a number of specified conditions. The obligations of Apollo are subject to: (i) there having been no misstatement in any material respect of any representation or warranty of the Company when such representations and warranties were originally made and as of the Closing (except for such changes as are permitted in compliance with the Asset Purchase Agreement); (ii) the Company having fully performed and complied in all material respects with its obligations under the Asset Purchase Agreement required to be performed by it prior to the Closing; (iii) all documents, instruments, certificates and opinions required to be delivered by the Company or any other party representing the Company, as contemplated by the Asset Purchase Agreement, having been duly executed and delivered; (iv) all consents, approvals and authorizations required to be obtained prior to Closing from certain identified third parties in connection with the execution and delivery and performance of the Asset Purchase Agreement have been made or obtained; (v) Apollo having obtained financing from its senior lender, Shawmut Capital Corporation; (vi) the Company having complied, on a basis acceptable to the Company, with applicable New Jersey environmental statutes; (vii) completion by the Company of a physical inventory of the tangible assets being acquired by Apollo; (viii) the Company having disseminated this Information Statement as required under the Exchange Act and the requisite 20 day period following such dissemination shall have been lapsed; and (ix) the execution, and delivery by Safeguard of the Parent Guarantee Agreement. The obligations of the Company to consummate the transactions contemplated by the Asset Purchase Agreement are further subject to the satisfaction or waiver of the following conditions at or prior to Closing: (i) there having been no misstatement in any material respect of any representation and warranty of Apollo when such representations and warranties originally made and as of the date of the Closing (except for such changes permitted in compliance with the Asset Purchase Agreement); (ii) Apollo having fully performed and complied in all material respects with its obligations required to be performed prior to Closing under the Asset Purchase Agreement; (iii) all documents, agreements, certificates and opinions required to be delivered by Apollo or any party representing Apollo, as contemplated by the Asset Purchase Agreement, having been duly executed and delivered; (iv) the Company having complied, on a basis acceptable to the Company, with the applicable New Jersey environmental statutes; (v) the Company having received the approval of Mellon Bank to release Mellon's liens on the assets being purchased by Apollo and (vi) the Company having disseminated this Information Statement as required under the Exchange Act and the requisite 20 day period following such dissemination shall have been lapsed. No Sale Negotiations The Asset Purchase Agreement provides that neither the Company nor any person acting on its behalf will take any action to solicit, encourage, initiate or participate in any way in discussions or negotiations with, or furnish any information with respect to the Furnishings Business to, any third party in connection with any possible proposed sale of capital stock, sale of the substantial portion of the assets, any merger, business combination or other similar transaction involving the Furnishings Business. Management The Asset Purchase Agreement provides that the Company will pay to Apollo an amount equal to 1.5% of gross revenues of the Furnishings Business from July 1, 1995 through Closing or termination of the Agreement, as compensation for Apollo assuming managerial operation of the Furnishings Business. Additional Covenants Prior to Closing The Asset Purchase Agreement provides that the Company will operate its business only in the ordinary course consistent with past practices and will preserve its business organization and the Furnishings Business intact, not to dispose of or transfer any portion of the Furnishings Business or otherwise make any fundamental change therein. Termination Provisions The Asset Purchase Agreement provides it may be terminated any time prior to Closing (i) by mutual consent of the parties, (ii) by the non- defaulting party as a result of inaccuracies in the representations and warranties or the failure to perform covenants and agreements required to be performed by the defaulting party, (iii) by either party if one or more of the conditions to such party's obligations to proceed to Closing has not been fulfilled by the Closing Date, (iv) by either party if Closing has not occurred on or prior to August 25, 1995, and (v) by either party if certain legal proceedings are commenced challenging consummation of the Closing. If at any time Safeguard receives a bona fide written letter of intent regarding the purchase of its stock investment in CenterCore or the purchase of substantially or all of the assets of CenterCore, within seven days of receipt of notice of CenterCore's intent to terminate the exclusive relationship described above, Apollo shall have the option of either (i) submitting a letter of intent in similar form and substance to that received by Safeguard and initiating due diligence regarding the purchase of Safeguard stock investment in Seller or (ii) terminating all actions with respect to Seller. In such event, if the Agreement is terminated pursuant to this provision, the Company will be obligated to pay Apollo a termination fee equal to Buyer's out of pocket expenses to third parties plus $2,000 per business day from January 11, 1995 to the decision to terminate, up to a maximum of $150,000. Non Competition Agreement The Asset Purchase Agreement provides that the Company will not, for a period of three years following the Closing Date, compete, directly or indirectly, with Apollo in the Furnishings Business in the United States, Canada or any other country in which the Furnishings Business has been conducted since January 1, 1994. Expenses The Asset Purchase Agreement provides that each party will pay all of the fees and expenses incurred by it (including the fees and expenses of counsel) in connection with the negotiation, execution and delivery and performance of the Asset Purchase Agreement and transactions contemplated hereby except that the fees of the arbitrator resolving disputes respecting the Closing Balance Sheet are to be paid equally by the parties. Guarantee Agreement Safeguard has agreed to guarantee the payment of the indemnification obligations of the Company pursuant to a certain Parent Guarantee Agreement subject to certain terms and conditions. In addition, Safeguard has agreed that to the extent it receives funds from the Company in reimbursement of any prior indemnifications paid by Safeguard or any other funds from the Company after March 31, 1995, under certain circumstances, Safeguard will be required to pay such amounts to Apollo to the extent Apollo is entitled to indemnification from the Company which is not paid or Apollo is required to disgorge amounts previously paid to it by the Company in respect of indemnification obligations. Safeguard's obligation to make guarantee payments on account of the Company's indemnification obligations is limited to a maximum of $1 million. In addition, with respect to indemnification relating to environmental matters, Safeguard is only obligated to pay one-half of the first $250,000 that the Company fails to pay in respect of any such matter and, with respect to other Company indemnification obligations, Safeguard has no obligation to pay until the Company has failed to pay $100,000 of such other indemnification obligations and then only in amounts in excess of such $100,000 threshold. The obligation of Safeguard to guarantee indemnification obligations of the Company terminates on the earlier of the expiration of the Company's indemnification obligations with respect to any specific indemnification claim and 15 years after Closing. Use of Proceeds The Company anticipates that it will receive Cash Consideration of approximately $2.5 million at Closing, $2 million of aggregate Installment Payments during 1996, and $2 million of aggregate payments as the Subordinated Note Component during 1997 through 2000. The Company will use all of the proceeds from the sale to reduce its outstanding bank debt, which it anticipates will be approximately $4.5 million immediately after to the Closing on August 25, 1995. The Company will assign its right to receive the Installment Payments and the Subordinated Note Component to its bank as additional collateral for its bank debt. The Company intends to draw on its credit facility from Safeguard to pay closing costs associated with the sale. Stockholder Approval The Company is a Delaware corporation. The Company believes that the Sale Transaction constitutes a sale of a substantial portion of the assets of the Company under Delaware law, and therefore requires stockholder approval by the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast by all stockholders entitled to vote thereon. The Company will continue to operate its security and control system integration and installation business through its subsidiary Maris and its indoor air quality business through its subsidiary Airo Clean. Safeguard, which is the holder of 69.1% of the outstanding voting shares of the Company has advised the Company that it will vote its shares to approve the Sale Transaction in accordance with the purchase agreement. Safeguard's vote, by itself, will be sufficient to achieve stockholder approval of the Sale Transaction. Rights of Dissenting Stockholders Under Delaware law, dissenting stockholders will not have any rights of appraisal as a result of the approval or consummation of the Sale Transaction. Accounting Treatment Because the Company decided to dispose of the Furnishings Business as of the end of 1994 and to treat the business as a discontinued operation, the Company wrote down certain of its assets related to the Furnishings Business in the fourth quarter of 1994 to reflect management's estimate of their value in a disposition, and accrued a reserve for anticipated costs of disposition of the business. As a result, the sale price for the business will be approximately equal to the net book value of the assets being sold, and the Company does not expect to realize any material gain or loss on the Sale Transaction, provided that the deferred purchase price payments are made in the amounts provided for in the Purchase Agreement. Federal Income Tax Consequences As described above under "Accounting Treatment," the Company has taken certain charges in the fourth quarter of 1994, as a result of which the Company does not expect to realize any material gain or loss for federal income tax purposes on the Sale Transaction, provided that the deferred purchase price payments are made in the amounts provided for in the Purchase Agreement. The Sale Transaction will not result in any federal income tax consequences to the stockholders of the Company. Regulatory Compliance The transfer of the lease of the factory and warehouse facility in Plainfield, New Jersey, which is a material part of the Sale Transaction, is subject to review and approval by the New Jersey Department of Environmental Regulation under New Jersey's so called "ISRA" statute. Such approval has been received. Market Price for the Company's Common Stock The Company's Common Stock is quoted by certain market makers in what is commonly referred to as the "pink sheets." On May 25, 1995, the day before the announcement of the execution of the Purchase Agreement, there was no trading in the Common Stock, but the bid and asked prices quoted by a market maker on that day were $.06 and $.25, respectively. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA The historical financial data presented below for the five years ended December 31, 1994 are derived from the Company's audited consolidated financial statements. The presentation of selected pro forma financial data would not clarify any trends in the Company's operations or financial condition because the furnishings segment to be sold is already treated as discontinued operations in the historical financial data. Therefore, no selected pro forma financial data is presented here. However, pro forma financial statements are presented elsewhere in this Information Statement. This table should be read in conjunction with "MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS," and the historical and pro forma financial statements and information presented elsewhere in this Information Statement and in the Company's 1994 Annual Report to Stockholders. All amounts are in thousands, except per share data. The Company has never declared cash dividends on its common stock. [Enlarge/Download Table] Three months ended March 31, Year ended December 31, ----------------------- ------------------------------------------------------- 1995 1994 1994 1993 1992 1991 1990 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Net sales $4,189 $10,860 $31,245 $15,242 $-- $-- $-- Net earnings (loss) Continuing operations (404) 2 (10,392) (113) -- -- -- Discontinued operations (509) (5,048) (703) 989 282 (1,249) ----------------------- ------------------------------------------------------- Net earnings (loss) (404) (507) (15,440) (816) 989 282 (1,249) Earnings (loss) per share Continuing operations (.04) (1.00) (.01) - - - Discontinued operations (.05) (.48) (.07) .09 .03 (.12) ----------------------- ------------------------------------------------------- Net earnings (loss) (.04) (.05) (1.48) (.08) .09 .03 (.12) March 31, December 31, ----------------------- ------------------------------------------------------- 1995 1994 1994 1993 1992 1991 1990 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Working capital (10,404) 5,831 (11,379) 3,947 -- -- -- Total assets 14,934 34,888 16,691 34,571 16,014 17,773 19,645 Long-term debt 0 11,636 0 9,939 4,451 6,393 8,335 Stockholders' equity (deficit) (4,866) 9,677 (4,425) 10,236 11,078 10,667 10,395 Book value per common share (.47) .93 (.40) .98 1.04 .99 .96 Discontinued operations includes the furnishings segment and Nord Systems. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS Overview In 1995 the Company decided to significantly downsize the Maris business by concentrating on the low voltage security and fire alarm business and selected smart highway applications. The majority of net sales in the first quarter of 1994 represented bonded correctional facility and airport projects that the Company has not pursued in 1995. Due to declining furniture sales, particularly to the federal government, the Company has decided to dispose of the furnishings segment. The Company has agreed to sell the assets of the domestic furnishings segment including Corel for cash and notes receivable. The Company will apply the sale proceeds to pay down its bank debt which is expected to close in July 1995. The UK furnishings business will be sold to local management in return for notes receivable. The Canadian operation was sold to Safeguard Scientifics, Inc. in April 1995. Due to these plans, the furnishings segment has been presented as a discontinued operation. Continuing operations reflect the results of the on-going businesses of Maris Equipment Company ("Maris") and Airo Clean. Due to the disposition of the furnishings segment and the change in the focus of the business, comparisons from year to year are not necessarily meaningful. Review of continuing operations during the first quarter of 1995 Net sales for the quarter ended March 31, 1995 were $4.2 million compared to $10.9 million for the comparable period in 1994. The Company reported a net loss of $403,900 or $.04 per share, compared to a net loss of $507,500 in the same period in 1994. From continuing operations the first quarter of 1995 loss was $403,900 compared to essentially break-even for the comparable period in 1994. First quarter 1995 Maris sales were $2.9 million compared to $9.6 million in 1994. Sales in 1994 included $7.1 million in bonded correctional facility and airport projects which were turned over to the bonding companies for completion. Maris gross profits as a percentage of sales increased to 18.9% in the first quarter of 1995 from 15.4% in the same period in 1994. First quarter 1995 and 1994 Airo Clean sales were $1.3 million. Airo Clean gross profits as a percentage of sales increased to 24.4% in the first quarter of 1995 from 17.1% in the same period in 1994, due to the Company obtaining price concessions from its vendors and selected increases in selling prices. Sales and marketing expenses decreased in the first quarter of 1995 by $380,600 compared to 1994 due to cost reductions implemented at Maris and Airo Clean. Sales efforts at Maris are being concentrated in expanding the electronic security systems business, which typically has had higher gross profits than the correctional facility and airport hardware construction business. The competitive environment and the difficulty in estimating costs and collecting revenues has adversely impacted Maris' gross margins on long-term correctional facility and airport construction projects. The shorter completion cycle coupled with a less competitive environment has enabled Maris to achieve higher gross margins in the electronic security systems business. The Company has elected to concentrate on the electronic security systems business due to the Company's expertise and the higher potential profits resulting from the relatively high gross margins. Marketing efforts at Airo Clean have been focused on promoting the BioShield and Ultraguard products which are air scrubbing devices for controlling airborne pathogens and targeted for the health care industry. First quarter 1995 general and administrative expenses decreased $356,400 compared to 1994 due principally to staff reductions and salary freezes implemented at Maris and Airo Clean. The Company continues to closely monitor and control costs and recognizes that a significantly downsized business in 1995 is necessary for survival. As a percentage of net sales, sales and marketing and general and administrative expenses increased in the first quarter of 1995 compare to the first quarter of 1994. This is the result of the decrease in sales. The Company believes that additional sales can be achieved without a proportional increase in business infrastructure. However, it may be difficult for the Company to increase its sales due to the Company's recent difficulties and its constrained financial resources. Interest expense in the first quarter of 1995 was $171,500 compared to $96,100 for the comparable period in 1994. The increase in 1995 reflects additional debt incurred to satisfy working capital requirements, fund losses and higher interest rates. The Company currently is not able to utilize any tax benefits from the losses incurred. The Company has generated an unrecorded loss carry forward of approximately $3 million which is available to off-set future income until the year 2010. Liquidity and Capital Resources As a result of significant operating difficulties, the Company has a severe liquidity problem. The Company is in default of its loan facility ($8.3 million at March 31, 1995). These defaults cause the debt to be due upon demand, and, should the lender demand payment, the Company does not have the resources to satisfy the debt. The Company has withdrawn from the correctional facility security business and is undertaking to significantly downsize the business which includes the sale of the furnishings business unit. Proceeds from the sale, as well as a 1995 tax refund of $1.6 million received in the second quarter of 1995, will reduce outstanding bank debt. In anticipation of these events, the bank continues to extend credit to the Company under the existing borrowing base formula. Except for a $2.4 million guarantee of bank debt, Safeguard is not contractually obligated to satisfy any of the Company's obligations at December 31,1994. The Company believes that the combination of cash received from the sale of the furnishings business, the tax refund, the guarantee of Safeguard and the working capital assets of the ongoing business will be sufficient to satisfy/support all of the bank debt. The Company has entered into an agreement with the parties from whom it acquired Maris, to significantly restructure the original purchase transaction. Under this agreement the seller has agreed to offset its $3.6 million note receivable from the Company in exchange for releases from its indemnification liabilities to the Company under the original asset purchase agreement. Because the Company did not have the required working capital to complete certain projects it turned to its sureties to assume and complete certain construction contracts and has extended its payables to vendors. The principal sureties have agreed to release the Company from its indemnity obligations to them in return for 300,000 shares of CenterCore stock, cash payments of $495,000 and additional payments equal to 20% of the Company's net earnings in 1998-2002 up to $1 million in the aggregate. The Company is negotiating with all principal vendors to arrange a repayment schedule while continuing to supply the Company with materials needed to meet current requirements. Safeguard has agreed to contribute 2 million shares of its CenterCore common stock to the Company, sell 2.5 million shares of its CenterCore common stock to CenterCore management, and provide up to $3 million in advances to the Company to address current funding requirements of the downsized business which will be substantially utilized by the Company in 1995. Through mid June of 1995 Safeguard has funded approximately $700,000 of this advance. As a result of the restructurings, the Company has emerged as a significantly downsized company. Availability of bonding on jobs will, at least in the near term, be limited. Bank financing may be available for limited working capital requirements to augment any advances from Safeguard. If these sources of funds prove to be inadequate or in the case of bank financing, unavailable, then the Company will have to seek additional funds from other investors in order to continue operations. There can be no assurance that new sources of funds, if required, will be available. Although the Company believes it will be able to continue to operate in this new downsized mode, continuation is contingent on the Company's ability to adequately reduce its cost structure to a point where it is supported by the new downsized operations. [Enlarge/Download Table] CENTERCORE, INC. Consolidated Balance Sheets March 31, December 31, 1995 1994 ------------ ------------ (unaudited) Assets Current assets Cash $ 358,100 $ 583,600 Receivables, less allowances ($2,786,900 --1995; $2,865,100 --1994 4,349,500 5,024,900 Costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings on uncompleted contracts 362,300 292,500 Inventories 827,400 625,700 Income taxes receivable 1,399,500 1,357,900 Other current assets 479,500 231,300 ----------- ------------- Total current assets 7,776,300 8,115,900 Net assets of discontinued operations 5,791,400 7,157,300 Plant and equipment Leasehold improvements 155,400 155,400 Machinery and equipment 847,400 816,900 ----------- ------------- 1,002,800 972,300 Less accumulated depreciation and amortization (455,100) (385,400) ----------- ------------- Net plant and equipment 547,700 586,900 Other assets Excess of cost over net assets of businesses acquired 188,500 192,300 Other 630,000 638,300 ----------- ------------- Total other assets 818,500 830,600 ----------- ------------- $14,933,900 $16,690,700 =========== ============= See note to consolidated financial statements [Enlarge/Download Table] CENTERCORE, INC. Consolidated Balance Sheets March 31, December 31, 1995 1994 ----------- ------------- (unaudited) Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity (Deficit) Current liabilities Accounts payable $ 5,232,000 $ 5,885,500 Accrued expenses 3,325,600 3,793,500 Taxes on income Billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings on uncomplete 1,180,500 1,419,800 Current debt 8,442,100 8,396,100 ----------- ------------- Total current liabilities 18,180,200 19,494,900 Long-term debt Other liabilities 120,200 121,300 Deferred taxes Redeemable convertible preferred stock issued to Safegaurd Scientifics, Inc. 1,500,000 1,500,000 Stockholders' equity (deficit) Common stock, $.01 par value; Authorized -- 20,000,000 shares; Issued - 10,767,326 shares 107,700 107,700 Additional paid-in capital 7,923,400 7,923,400 Retained earnings (accumulated deficit) (12,440,000) (12,036,100) Foreign currency translation adjustment (37,100) 0 Treasury stock at cost - 330,000 shares (420,500) (420,500) ----------- ------------- Total stockholders' equity (deficit) (4,866,500) (4,425,500) ----------- ------------- $14,933,900 $16,690,700 See note to consolidated financial statements =========== ============= [Enlarge/Download Table] CENTERCORE, INC. Consolidated Statements of Operations (UNAUDITED) Three Months Ended March 31, ------------------------------- 1995 1994 ----------- ----------- Net sales $ 4,187,800 $10,859,900 Cost of goods sold 3,322,500 9,165,700 ----------- ----------- Gross profit 865,300 1,694,200 Expenses Sales and marketing 518,300 898,900 General and administrative 579,400 935,800 Interest 171,500 96,100 ----------- ----------- 1,269,200 1,930,800 Loss from continuing operations before income taxes (403,900) (236,600) Benefit of income taxes (238,100) ----------- ----------- (Loss) earnings from continuing operations (403,900) 1,500 Loss from discontinued operations (509,000) ----------- ----------- Net loss $(403,900) $(507,500) =========== =========== Earnings (loss) per share Continuing operations $(.04) $.00 Discontinued operations (.05) ----------- ----------- Net earnings (loss) $(.04) $(.05) =========== =========== Weighted average shares outstanding 10,437,000 10,437,000 See note to consolidated financial statements [Enlarge/Download Table] CENTERCORE, INC. Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (unaudited) Three Months Ended March 31, -------------------------------- 1995 1994 ------------ ------------ Operations Net Loss $ (403,900) $ (507,500) Loss from discontinued operations 509,000 Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) to cash from operations Depreciation and amortization 81,600 107,100 Decrease in deferred taxes (100) Cash from discontinued operations 1,366,100 384,700 Cash provided by (used in) changes in working capital items Receivables 675,400 566,400 Inventories (201,700) 62,000 Contracts in progress (309,100) (1,080,500) Other current assets (248,200) (111,700) Accounts payable (653,500) (284,200) Accrued expenses (467,900) (458,100) Taxes on Income (41,600) (605,900) ------------ ------------ Cash (used in) operations (202,800) (1,418,800) Financing Activities Borrowings of debt 44,900 1,762,100 ------------ ------------ Cash provided by financing activities 44,900 1,762,100 Investing Activities Expenditures for plant and equipment (30,500) (37,000) Other, net (37,100) (72,300) ------------ ------------ Cash used in investing activities (67,600) (109,300) ------------ ------------ Increase (decrease) in cash (225,500) 234,000 Cash beginning of period 583,600 376,900 ------------ ------------ Cash end of period $ 358,100 $ 610,900 ============ ============ See note to consolidated financial statements CENTERCORE, INC. NOTE TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 1. Organization and Business Operations The accompanying unaudited interim financial statements were prepared in accordance with generally accepted principles for interim financial information. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. The summary of significant accounting policies and notes to financial statements included in the 1994 Form 10-K should be read in conjunction with the accompanying statements. These statements include all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring accurals) which the Company believes are necessary for a fair presentation of the statements. The interim operating results are not necessarily indicative of the results expected for a full year. 2. Current Debt Due to the losses incurred in the second half of 1994, the Company is not in compliance with certain financial convenants under its bank agreements. The Company has not been successful in restructuring these covenants, therefore the formerly long-term bank borrowings has been reflected as a current obligation as the bank has the ability to request immediate loan repayment. By mutual agreement with the bank availability under credit facility has been reduced to $7.7 million in May 1995. As of July 24, 1995 outstanding borrowings under the credit facility were $6.5 million. The Company will use the proceeds from the sale of the furnishings business (estimated to be approximately $2.5 million at closing plus $4.0 million over five years), a tax refund of $1.6 million received in the second quarter of 1995 and cash generated from the discounted operation prior to its sale to reduce the outstanding bank debt. The remaining bank debt will be supported by working capital of the Company augmented by guarantees and letters of credit from Safegaurd. PRO FORMA FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited) The pro forma financial statement and information presented below give effect to the sale of the Furnishings Business to Apollo. The pro forma balance sheet is presented as of March 31, 1995, assuming a closing of the Sale Transaction on that date. A narrative description of the pro forma effects of the Sale Transaction on the Company's statement of operations for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1994 and for the three months ended March 31, 1995 is provided below in lieu of a pro forma statement of operations. [Enlarge/Download Table] CENTERCORE, INC. Pro Forma Consolidated Balance Sheets As of March 31,1995 (unaudited) Pro Forma Adjustments increase As reported (decrease) Pro Forma ------------- ------------- ----------- (unaudited) Assets Current assets Cash $ 358,100 $ $ 358,100 Receivables, net 4,349,500 4,349,600 Notes receivable 801,500 (a) 801,500 Costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings on uncompleted contracts 362,300 362,300 Inventories 827,400 827,400 Income taxes receivable 1,399,500 1,399,500 Other current assets 479,500 479,500 ----------- ----------- ----------- Total current assets 7,776,300 1,030,500 8,806,800 Net assets of discontinued operations 5,791,400 (5,791,400)(b) 0 Plant and equipment Leasehold improvements 155,400 155,400 Machinery and equipment 847,400 847,400 ----------- ----------- ----------- 1,002,800 1,002,800 Less accumulated depreciation and amortization (455,100) (455,100) ----------- ----------- ----------- Net plant and equipment 547,700 547,700 Other assets Excess of cost over net assets of businesses acquired 188,500 188,500 Notes receivable 2,871,900 (c) 2,871,900 Other 630,000 630,000 ----------- ----------- ----------- Total other assets 818,500 2,642,900 3,461,400 ----------- ----------- ----------- $14,933,900 $(2,118,000) $12,815,900 =========== =========== =========== See notes to pro forma consolidated balance sheet [Enlarge/Download Table] CENTERCORE, INC. Pro Forma Consolidated Balance Sheets As of March 31,1995 (unaudited) Pro Forma Adjustments increase As reported (decrease) Pro Forma ------------- ------------- ----------- (unaudited) Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity (Deficit) Current liabilities Accounts payable $ 5,232,000 $ 5,232,000 Accrued expenses 3,325,600 (350,000)(d) 2,975,600 Billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings on unccompleted contracts 1,180,500 1,180,500 Current debt 8,442,100 (1,768,000)(e) 6,674,100 ----------- ----------- ----------- Total current liabilities 18,180,200 (2,118,000) 16,062,200 Other liabilities 120,200 120,200 Redeemable convertible preferred stock 1,500,000 1,500,000 Stockholders' equity (deficit) Common stock, $.01 par value; Authorized -- 20,000,000 shares; Issued - 10,767,326 shares 107,700 107,700 Additional paid-in capital 7,923,400 7,923,400 Retained earnings (accumulated deficit) (12,440,000) (12,440,000) Foreign currency translation adjustment (37,100) (37,100) Treasury stock at cost - 330,000 shares (420,500) (420,500) ----------- ----------- ----------- Total stockholders' equity (deficit) (4,866,500) (4,866,500) ----------- ----------- ----------- $14,933,900 $(2,118,000) $12,815,900 =========== =========== =========== See notes to pro forma consolidated balance sheet CENTERCORE, INC. NOTES TO PRO FORMA BALANCE SHEET (unaudited) The Furnishings Business will be sold for a purchase price comprised of three components: cash consideration of $2.5 million less the amount, if any, by which the working capital of the domestic furniture business is less than $5 million; installment payments equal to the sum of $1 million, plus accounts receivable less assumed liabilities at Closing, plus one-half of the excess of inventory at Closing over $1 million, less the cash consideration; and a subordinated note equal to one-half of the difference between inventory at Closing less $1 million, less any excess inventory reserve at Closing, plus $1.065 million plus or minus certain capital expenditures, plus security deposits and pre-paid expenses at Closing. Based on the Company's current best estimate, the cash consideration will be approximately $2.5 million, the aggregate installment payments will be approximately $2 million, and the subordinated note will be approximately $2 million, for an aggregate purchase price of approximate $6.5 million. The following pro forma adjustments are based on working capital of March 31, 1995. Actual proceeds expected to be received will differ. (a) Represents the current portion of the installment note due from the Apollo Group. The installment note, for $1,717,500 will be payable in 4 installments beginning 9 months after the close of the transaction which is expected to occur in August 1995 secured by a second lien on all the assets of the buyer. (b) Reflects payment to the Company of an assumed furnishings segment purchase price of $5,791,400 (computed in accordance with terms of the Asset Purchase Agreement, but based on the furnishing net book value, as defined, at March 31, 1995. (c) Represents the remaining two payments of the installment note and the entire subordinated note due from the Apollo Group. The subordinated note, for $1,955,900, will be payable in semiannual installments beginning 18 months through 5 years after closing and bears interest at 8% per annum secured by a second lien on the fixed assets of the buyer. (d) Closing costs include, professional fees and expenses of $350,000 related to the sale of furnishings segment. (e) Reflects cash payment to the Company at closing of $2,118,000 less estimated closing costs of $350,000, see note (d). If the furnishings segment were sold on January 1, 1995 and 1994 net earnings from continuing operations would not be materially different, because the historical statements of operations for the fiscal year ended 1994 and the first quarter of 1995 reflect the furnishings segment as a discontinued operation. The only adjustments would be to reduce interest expense by approximately $182,000 for fiscal year 1994 and by $56,000 in the first quarter of 1995 to reflect the use of the sale proceeds to pay down the Company's bank credit facility and the elimination of the discontinued operations. Net loss from continuing operations would be $10,210,000 or, $.98 per share, for fiscal year 1994 and $347,900, or $.03 per share, for the first quarter of 1995. INCORPORATION OF CERTAIN DOCUMENTS BY REFERENCE This Information Statement incorporates by reference the following documents: 1. The Company's Annual Report to Stockholders which is being delivered to Stockholders herewith in respect to the annual stockholders meeting to which this Information Statement relates. 2. The Asset Purchase Agreement dated May 26, 1995 between the Company, Corel Corporate Seating, Inc., Safeguard Scientifics, Inc. and The CenterCore Group, Inc., which has been filed by the Company with the SEC together with a preliminary copy of this Information Statement. The Company will furnish to any stockholder without charge, upon written or telephonic request, a copy of the Asset Purchase Agreement. Requests should be directed to Frederick B. Franks, Chief Financial Officer, CenterCore, Inc., 110 Summit Drive, Exton, PA 19341; phone: (610) 524- 7000. INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS Since 1986, the Company has retained KPMG Peat Marwick LLP as its independent public accountants, and it intends to retain KPMG Peat Marwick LLP for the current year ending December 31, 1995. Representatives of KPMG Peat Marwick LLP are expected to be present at the Annual Meeting, will have an opportunity at the Annual Meeting to make a statement if they desire to do so, and will be available to respond to appropriate questions. COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 16(a) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 requires the Company's directors, executive officers, and persons who own more than ten percent of a registered class of the Company's equity securities ("10% Stockholders") to file reports of ownership and changes in ownership of Common Stock and other equity securities of the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"). Officers, directors and 10% Stockholders are required by SEC regulation to furnish the Company with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file. Based solely on its review of the copies of such forms received by it and written representations from certain reporting persons that no other reports were required for those persons, the Company believes that during the period from January 1, 1994 to December 31, 1994, all Section 16(a) filing requirements applicable to its officers, directors and 10% Stockholders were complied with, except for a late Form 3 filed by Mr. Pelosi and one transaction which was reported late on a Form 4 by Safeguard Scientifics, Inc. OTHER MATTERS The Company is not aware of any other business to be presented at the Annual Meeting. The Company's Annual Report to Stockholders for the year ended December 31, 1994, including financial statements and other information with respect to the Company and its subsidiaries, is being mailed simultaneously to the stockholders. Dated: August , 1995

Dates Referenced Herein   and   Documents Incorporated by Reference

This ‘PRER14C’ Filing    Date    Other Filings
10/28/03
6/1/01
2/1/98
12/31/96
9/30/9610-Q
6/30/9610-Q
3/8/96
12/31/9510-K
8/25/958-K
8/24/95
8/14/9510-Q
Filed on:8/1/95
7/24/95
7/1/95
6/27/95
6/15/95
6/1/95
5/26/95
5/25/95
5/6/95
3/31/9510-Q,  10-Q/A
3/13/95
1/11/95
1/4/95
1/1/95
12/31/9410-K/A,  DEF 14C,  PRE 14C
12/12/94
1/1/94
 List all Filings 
Top
Filing Submission 0000928816-95-000036   –   Alternative Formats (Word / Rich Text, HTML, Plain Text, et al.)

Copyright © 2024 Fran Finnegan & Company LLC – All Rights Reserved.
AboutPrivacyRedactionsHelp — Sun., Apr. 28, 9:41:48.1pm ET