SEC Info  
    Home      Search      My Interests      Help      Sign In      Please Sign In

Seven Up RC Bottling Company of Southern California Inc – ‘10-K405’ for 12/31/96

As of:  Monday, 4/7/97   ·   For:  12/31/96   ·   Accession #:  898430-97-1416   ·   File #:  0-28726

Find Words in Filings emoji
 
  in    Show  and   Hints

  As Of                Filer                Filing    For·On·As Docs:Size              Issuer               Agent

 4/07/97  Seven Up RC Bottling Co of S… Inc 10-K405    12/31/96    2:143K                                   Donnelley R R & S… 05/FA

Annual Report — [x] Reg. S-K Item 405   —   Form 10-K
Filing Table of Contents

Document/Exhibit                   Description                      Pages   Size 

 1: 10-K405     Form 10-K405 Dated 12/31/96                           60    261K 
 2: EX-27       Financial Data Schedule                                2      6K 


10-K405   —   Form 10-K405 Dated 12/31/96
Document Table of Contents

Page (sequential) | (alphabetic) Top
 
11st Page   -   Filing Submission
3Item 1. Business
14Item 2. Properties
15Item 3. Legal Proceedings
16Item 4. Submission of Matters to A Vote of Security Holders
18Item 6. Selected Financial Data
20Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
26Recent Accounting Pronouncements
27Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
28Item 9. Changes of and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
29Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant
30Item 11. Executive Compensation
34Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management
36Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions
37Item 14. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules and Reports on Form 8-K
38Signatures
39Index to Financial Statements
53Senior Secured Notes
10-K4051st Page of 60TOCTopPreviousNextBottomJust 1st
 

================================================================================ SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 -------------------------- FORM 10-K X ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES ------ EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996 TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE ------ SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 -------------------------- Commission File Number 33-47718 SEVEN-UP/RC BOTTLING COMPANY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, INC. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) DELAWARE 95-4284699 (State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer incorporation or organization) Identification Number) 3220 East 26th Street Vernon, California 90023 (Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code) (213) 268-7779 (Registrant's telephone number, including area code) Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such report(s)), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. YES X NO . --- --- Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. [X] At March 31, 1997 there were 5,000,000 shares of Common Stock outstanding and the aggregate market value of the outstanding shares held by non-affiliates was approximately $60,000,000 based on the closing price per share reported on the OTC Bulletin Board on such date. ================================================================================
10-K4052nd Page of 60TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 2nd
SEVEN-UP/RC BOTTLING COMPANY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, INC. INDEX [Download Table] Page PART I Item 1. Business 2 Item 2. Properties 13 Item 3. Legal Proceedings 14 Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders 15 PART II Item 5. Market for Registrants' Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters 16 Item 6. Selected Financial Data 17 Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations 19 Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data 26 Item 9. Changes of and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure 27 PART III Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant 28 Item 11. Executive Compensation 29 Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management 33 Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions 35 PART IV Item 14. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules and Reports on Form 8-K 36 SIGNATURES............................................. 37 -1-
10-K4053rd Page of 60TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 3rd
PART I ITEM 1. BUSINESS GENERAL Seven-Up/RC Bottling Company of Southern California, Inc., a Delaware corporation ("Seven-Up/RC" or the "Company"), is among the largest beverage distributors in the United States, and is the largest bottler of Seven-Up in the United States. Seven-Up/RC manufactures and distributes a broad range of beverage products in Southern California, Central California, and in portions of Nevada and New Mexico. Seven-Up/RC has the exclusive right within its territories to manufacture and/or distribute Seven-Up (lemon-lime), Royal Crown (cola), A&W (root beer and cream soda), Sunkist (orange and lemonade), Hawaiian Punch (fruit punch), Schweppes (ginger-ale and mixers), Evian (imported still water), Perrier (imported mineral water), Welch's (grape, strawberry and pineapple), Mistic (teas and juices), Yoo-Hoo (chocolate drink) and in its New Mexico franchise territory, Snapple (teas and juices). Seven-Up/RC's consolidated net sales in 1996 were $294,491,000, which includes $37,935,000 of net sales from Seven-Up/RC's wholly-owned subsidiary, Seven-Up/RC Bottling Company of Puerto Rico, Inc. ("Puerto Rico"), which was divested in June 1996 in connection with the Plan of Reorganization described below. Seven-Up/RC competes as an independent bottler on the basis of its large portfolio of franchised brands, its significant combined market share, its ability to market, distribute and merchandise its products effectively and favorable demographics within its territories. Seven-Up/RC's portfolio of franchised brands consists of highly recognizable trademarks that are in almost all cases the first ranking brand in their respective beverage flavor categories. Seven-Up/RC's combined market share of its franchised brands and products that are produced under contract manufacturing agreements, enables it to realize purchasing, manufacturing, marketing and delivery efficiencies. Additionally, Seven-Up/RC's territories have many attributes that contribute to revenue growth in the beverage industry, including a favorable climate and a high density of retail outlets in populous areas. Seven-Up/RC's products are made available to its customers through a network of distribution facilities that are strategically positioned within major population areas, and it distributes essentially all of its products directly to retail outlets through its direct-store-door ("DSD") distribution system. Through its DSD distribution system, Seven-Up/RC provides efficient, high-quality service to the more than 35,000 retail outlets that it serves. These retail outlets include supermarkets, warehouse clubs, convenience stores and other retail establishments that serve a combined population of over 30 million consumers. Seven-Up/RC's business strategy is to manufacture and distribute a franchised portfolio of leading trademarked beverages in each beverage flavor category and to create an additional source of revenue through contract manufacturing. In accordance with this strategy, its Liquitrend division ("Liquitrend") engages in contract manufacturing, which utilizes excess production capacity by manufacturing beverage products for a variety of small, independent franchisors, retailers selling private label products and wholesalers that distribute private label products for consumption both inside and outside of the United States. On May 13, 1996, Seven-Up/RC and its parent, Beverage Group Acquisition Corporation, a Delaware corporation ("BGAC"), filed petitions for relief under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code. BGAC had no independent operations and was a wholly-owned subsidiary of WB Bottling Corporation ("WB Bottling"), a privately held Delaware corporation. On May 16, 1996, Seven-Up/RC and BGAC filed their Joint Plan of Reorganization; subsequently, Seven-Up/RC and BGAC filed their First Amended Joint Plan of Reorganization dated June 19, 1996 (the "Plan of Reorganization"). The Plan of Reorganization was consummated on August 15, 1996. Pursuant to the Plan of Reorganization, $140,000,000 aggregate principal amount of 11.5% Senior Secured Notes Due 1999 of Seven-Up/RC (the "Senior Secured Notes"), together with the accrued interest thereon, was discharged. In connection with such discharge, the holders of the Senior Secured Notes received 98% of the -2-
10-K4054th Page of 60TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 4th
equity of Seven-Up/RC (subject to dilution to the extent certain warrants and options to be granted by Seven-Up/RC are exercised, and $55 million of proceeds from the sale of the stock of Puerto Rico. In addition, BGAC was merged into Seven-Up/RC. Seven-Up/RC's executive offices are located at 3220 East 26th Street, Vernon, California 90023. The telephone number at the Vernon location is (213) 268-7779. -3-
10-K4055th Page of 60TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 5th
BEVERAGE INDUSTRY Soft drinks are the most widely consumed beverage in the United States. Retail sales for the American soft drink industry in 1995 were estimated to be approximately $52 billion, of which approximately 58% were cola sales. Historically, the soft drink industry has been an industry of continual change and evolution. It is characterized by a relative absence of technological risk, lack of foreign competition and significant barriers to entry, primarily due to geographic exclusivity agreements with franchisors. Its competitive climate requires bottlers and franchisors to adapt quickly to market challenges, including changes in consumer tastes and package preferences and continuing developments in manufacturing and distribution methods. -4-
10-K4056th Page of 60TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 6th
TERRITORIES AND PRODUCTS The warm climate in Seven-Up/RC's territories considerably influences the trend towards higher per capita consumption of beverages. In addition, the high density of retail outlets in populous areas of its territories results in lower distribution costs. Unlike its principal competitors, Seven-Up/RC does not rely on any one trademark for a substantial majority of its sales. This diversification results in each brand receiving significant attention from the Company while providing the franchisor with the marketing and merchandising benefits of a larger bottler. Seven-Up/RC is committed to the profitability of its DSD business and will not seek to gain market share at the expense of profitability. The following table shows the percentage of DSD case sales for 1996 for each of the brands distributed in its territories: [Download Table] Brand % ----- ----- Seven-Up 45.1 A&W Brands 10.6 Royal Crown 9.6 Sunkist 8.1 Evian 5.7 Hawaiian Punch 5.6 Welch's 3.9 Schweppes 2.9 Perrier 1.4 Other (including fountain) 7.10 ----- 100.0 ===== Liquitrend manufactures a variety of beverage products pursuant to short- term and long-term contracts. Liquitrend also exports beverage products to Mexico and the Far East. Seven-Up/RC's portfolio of franchised brands consists of highly recognizable trademarks that are market leaders in their respective beverage flavor categories. Seven-Up/RC believes that it is able to achieve a competitive number of promotional displays and a competitive amount of shelf space in retail outlets because of the strength and diversification of the trademarks in its brand portfolio. Seven-Up/RC's brand portfolio has a significantly higher combined market share of the beverages sold in its territories as compared to most other independent bottlers. However, Coca-Cola and Pepsi-Cola together account for over 60% of the soft drinks sold in these territories. Seven-Up/RC believes that it is able to effectively compete in its territories because its combined market share gives it marketing and merchandising advantages that it would not otherwise have with a smaller or less diversified portfolio. -5-
10-K4057th Page of 60TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 7th
BOTTLING RIGHTS Seven-Up/RC has agreements with franchisors pursuant to which it has the exclusive right to manufacture and/or distribute certain beverage products in specified territories, and generally has non-exclusive rights to produce, distribute and market certain soft drink syrups in premix (ready-to-use) and postmix (concentrated) form for fountain sales. Syrup concentrates are one of the primary ingredients of beverage products. Concentrate formulas are highly proprietary and are owned solely by the respective franchisors. The franchisors manufacture and sell to Seven-Up/RC concentrates from which the beverage products are produced. The franchisors are entitled to set the price for their concentrate unilaterally. Under the franchise agreements, in connection with the marketing and distribution of the beverage products, Seven-Up/RC has the right to use the trade names and trademarks and associated patents, copyrights, designs and labels, all of which are owned by the respective franchisors. Seven-Up/RC considers its franchise agreements with Cadbury Beverages North America (trade names of Seven-Up, A&W, Sunkist, Welch's, Schweppes, Canada Dry and Crystal Light), Royal Crown Cola Co., and Great Brands of Europe, Inc. to be material to its operations. These and other franchise agreements generally contain certain affirmative obligations that include, but are not limited to, maintenance of sufficient production and distribution facilities to satisfy fully the demand for the various beverage products in its territories, maintenance of quality control standards as prescribed by the franchisor, maintenance of sound financial capacity, use of best efforts to promote sales, submission of annual marketing, management, and advertising plans for approval (which approval may not be unreasonably withheld) and the submission of reports as to the implementation of these plans. The agreements generally prohibit Seven-Up/RC from engaging in specific activities, including, but not limited to, distributing or selling the beverage products outside the specified franchise territories, producing or handling competing products or other products or packages that would imitate, infringe upon or cause confusion with the beverage products, trade dress, containers or trademarks of the franchisor and assigning, transferring or pledging an agreement, or any interest therein, whether voluntarily, involuntarily or by operation of law, without prior consent. No franchisor has ever terminated any of Seven-Up/RC's franchise agreements as a result of the breaching of any provisions thereof and Seven-Up/RC considers its relationship with each of the franchisors to be satisfactory. However, on July 28, 1995, the Company received a notice of termination of the distribution agreement dated September 12, 1990 (the "Distribution Agreement") with Great Brands of Europe, Inc. ("GBE"). The Distribution Agreement grants the Company the exclusive right to distribute Evian Water in Southern California. In its notice of termination, GBE stated its belief that termination was justified, based on the Company's decision to suspend interest payments on its Senior Secured Notes. Additionally, the termination notice stated that the Company would be allowed to distribute Evian Water on an at will basis. GBE's notice of termination was not effective until the expiration of the contractually specified cure period. Before the cure period (as extended by agreement between the parties) expired, the Company and GBE reached a settlement pursuant to which the termination notice was withdrawn and the Distribution Agreement was amended. The Distribution Agreement, as amended on January 12, 1996, grants certain termination rights to GBE in the event that certain execution performance standards are not met. The franchise agreements are either perpetual or for several years with automatic renewals. A franchisor may terminate the rights to produce, market and distribute products upon an event of default by Seven-Up/RC and in certain other limited circumstances. Events of default include, but are not limited to, failure to fulfill the affirmative obligations or violations of the prohibited activities as described above. Seven-Up/RC generally may terminate an agreement at any time without cause by giving proper notice to the franchisor. Termination of bottling rights with respect to its principal products would constitute an event of default under Seven-Up/RC's revolving credit facility and might have a material adverse effect on the financial position of Seven-Up/RC. -6-
10-K4058th Page of 60TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 8th
MANUFACTURING Seven-Up/RC produced 34.8 million cases in 1996 in its Vernon and Buena Park, California, and its Albuquerque, New Mexico manufacturing plants. Seven-Up/RC's largest manufacturing plant is located in Vernon, California, which is a combination manufacturing and distribution facility built in 1977. The Vernon plant operates two bottle lines and two can lines that can produce 42 million cases annually. Seven-Up/RC's Buena Park plant is diversified with four separate lines that produce cans, bottle, fountain products and pasteurized products. The Buena Park facility has a 27 million annual case capacity. The Albuquerque plant is a combined manufacturing and distribution facility that is capable of producing 3 million cases annually with one can line and one bottle line. The manufacturing process consists of receiving, batching, filling and packaging product. Empty containers are received in bulk and are moved from the supplier's trailers to de-palletizing equipment, which automatically places the empty containers on conveyors that carry them to the filling equipment. Treated water, concentrate, sweetener and additives are combined in large stainless steel tanks and are mixed, or "batched," with a motorized impeller. Each respective batch is then carbonated and sent to the filling equipment. At the same time, containers arrive by conveyor and are rinsed to remove any particulate matter. At the Vernon and Buena Park facilities, the containers are "air-rinsed" using ionized air and vacuum to remove dust particles. The filling equipment fills the air-rinsed containers with batched product at extremely high speeds. At the Vernon and Buena Park facilities, the containers are filled with batched product at ambient water temperature. This warm-fill process eliminates costs associated with refrigeration of the product (to reduce foaming in the filling process) and its subsequent warming (to reduce packaging damage caused by condensation). The filled cans and bottles are then automatically scanned or manually inspected to test filling level and cap or end placement. Cans are either packaged in multi-pack cartons or in corrugated trays and fastened with plastic rings. Bottles are usually packaged in returnable plastic shells. Each packaged case is then automatically transported to a "palletizer" where it is stacked on a wooden pallet to be stored before distribution. Seven-Up/RC purchases concentrate for its franchised brands directly from franchisors in accordance with franchise agreements. Price increases for concentrate are not limited by such agreements, but are imposed unilaterally by franchisors and have been historically 3 to 5% annually. The majority of Seven- Up/RC's other raw materials are purchased through a national cooperative of "non-Coke/Pepsi" bottlers that meet minimum volume requirements. The cooperative leverages the combined purchasing volume of its members in the negotiation of raw material costs. Most raw material contracts are for a period of one year or less. As a member of the cooperative, Seven-Up/RC believes that its costs for raw materials are comparable to those of its competitors. Key raw materials and their approximate percentage of material costs for 1996 include: concentrate (32.3%); aluminum cans (21.9%); purchased finished goods (including Evian, Snapple, Perrier and Yoo-Hoo) (18.6%); plastic bottles (9.0%); sweetener (8.4%); glass bottles (2.6%); packaging (1.9%); and other (5.3% including bottle closures and additives). Seven-Up/RC believes that adequate alternative sources exist for the majority of its raw materials with the exception of concentrate and purchased finished goods. Seven-Up/RC maintains a stringent quality control program. Automatic quality testing is performed on all of its products prior to and during the bottling process. A microbiologist and skilled technicians are kept on staff to test product, containers and packaging. Seven-Up/RC maintains an inventory management program that minimizes raw material inventory carrying costs and potential spoilage. In addition, only one day's supply of certain raw materials are kept on hand, including sweetener, cans and bottles. -7-
10-K4059th Page of 60TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 9th
SALES AND DISTRIBUTION Seven-Up/RC's sales methods differ according to its geographic markets and specific customer segments with sales oriented towards high-volume customers such as large retail chains, which results in economies of scale in selling and distribution expenses. Product orders are taken in advance by a salesperson and are generally delivered and merchandised within 24 hours by other employees. Seven-Up/RC utilizes its distribution channels to maximize market penetration with its principal method of distribution being DSD. DSD is the Company's preferred method of distribution because Seven-Up/RC has greater control over the sales, marketing and merchandising of its products. Deliveries are made by Seven-Up/RC's fleet of delivery vehicles located at each of its distribution facilities. The scope of Liquitrend's activities may be limited by the terms of Seven- Up/RC's franchise agreements and excess manufacturing capacity as Liquitrend utilizes this excess capacity to indirectly participate in other geographic markets. Liquitrend manufactures products for beverage or retail grocery companies that lack sufficient volume to justify the capital investment of a manufacturing plant. Seven-Up/RC makes cold drinks available to consumers through vending machines, fountain equipment and visi-coolers (bottler identified refrigerated cabinets). Vending machines are either sold, leased or loaned to retail outlets or distributors who are responsible for machine maintenance and product restocking. Visi-coolers are generally loaned to large retail outlets and convenience stores. In addition, Seven-Up/RC is involved in full-service vending. This process requires that the Company fill and service these vending machines and that a commission on sales is paid to the owner of the establishment at which the vending machine is placed. Fountain equipment dispenses products in restaurants, bars, amusement parks, theaters and other similar locations. Seven-Up/RC sells either premix, a ready-to-use product, or postmix, a concentrated product, to retailers in stainless steel or disposable containers for use in fountain equipment. However, Seven-Up/RC's fountain market share is not significant. During 1996, no single customer accounted for 10% or more of Seven-Up/RC's sales, and the Company is not dependent on any single customer. A significant portion of Seven-Up/RC's sales are made to large retail chains. However, because consumer demand requires these chains to stock Seven-Up/RC's products and because they are the only distributor of its products within its territories, Seven-Up/RC does not expect any of these large retail chains to discontinue its products. -8-
10-K40510th Page of 60TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 10th
MARKETING The marketing of beverage products is the primary basis of competition among soft drink bottlers. Successful bottlers must competitively price its products, creatively advertise in their territories and effectively execute promotional programs. Seven-Up/RC's marketing efforts are directed towards brand management, key account management, promotional activities and merchandising. Seven-Up/RC believes that its marketing program's allow it to compete effectively in its markets. Marketing programs for each of Seven-Up/RC's franchised brands are coordinated with the franchisors by its brand management group. National advertising campaigns are developed by the franchisors, while Seven-Up/RC brand managers develop local advertising campaigns, implement brand development strategies, direct promotional activities on a company-wide basis and monitor marketing support in accordance with annual marketing agreements with the franchisors. Seven-Up/RC's success is closely tied to its on-going relationships with its key accounts. Key account managers are responsible for coordinating promotional activities for a select group of accounts. These activities include placing "feature" newspaper advertisements that coincide with competitive pricing programs, obtaining authorization from the customer for new products and packages, and designing customer promotional programs to meet specific customer needs. A significant portion of Seven-Up/RC's promotional efforts focus on off- invoice allowances, newspaper advertising and coupons. The goal of these activities is to competitively position Seven-Up/RC brands in the marketplace and to obtain "feature" retail advertisements and end-aisle displays in high volume retail outlets. End-aisle and secondary displays are important marketing tools because they are tied to special promotions and feature advertisements that stimulate sales and encourage impulse purchases. Seven-Up/RC's merchandising activities seek to maintain high visibility and availability of its products in large grocery chains. Merchandisers are responsible for building displays in conjunction with promotional programs and restocking products on the beverage aisle of grocery stores. Seven-Up/RC assists its customers in obtaining maximum space utilization of the beverage aisle by employing a state-of-the-art computer program, which determines the most efficient use of shelf space based on sales volume and consumer preferences for product and packaging. This service is provided to its key accounts as a means of enhancing its relationship with these customers. Marketing expenditures are incurred by Seven-Up/RC, it's franchisors and by cooperative arrangements between the two. Retail promotional programs are Seven-Up/RC's most significant marketing expenditures and are paid for by the Company and supported through cooperative arrangements with its franchisors. National media advertising is funded by Seven-Up/RC's franchisors, while local media advertising is funded by the Company or through cooperative arrangements. -9-
10-K40511th Page of 60TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 11th
COMPETITION The soft drink industry is highly competitive. Over the past decade, the bottling industry has undergone significant horizontal consolidation (bottlers acquiring bottlers) and vertical consolidation (franchisors acquiring franchisors). Competition among bottlers is dependent on price, volume, advertising, promotional incentives and franchisor subsidies. Seven-Up/RC's principal competitors are Coca-Cola Enterprises, Inc. ("CCE") and the Pepsi-Cola Company ("COBO"), each of which is closely affiliated with its respective syrup company. Price competition between CCE and COBO has resulted in a consistent market-wide erosion of earnings over the past ten years. Seven-Up/RC competes in its markets by balancing the various elements that impact market share and profitability, and believes that long-term profitability is closely tied to market share stability. Additionally, Seven-Up/RC attempts to remain a "low-cost producer" through selected investments in manufacturing and distribution technology. -10-
10-K40512th Page of 60TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 12th
EMPLOYEES Seven-Up/RC employed 1,314 employees as of December 31, 1996. A majority of these employees (58%) are hourly workers covered by collective bargaining agreements. Various local chapters of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of America represent employees at Las Vegas, Santa Maria and San Diego under contracts expiring in 1998, 1999 and 2001, respectively. Seven-Up/RC has not had any strikes or work stoppages in the past 20 years and considers its relationship with its employees to be satisfactory. On February 13, 1997, employees covered by the United Industrial Workers elected to be represented by the Amalgamated Industrial Workers Union. Seven- Up/RC does not expect that this event will have a significant impact on its future financial performance or the relationship with its employees. -11-
10-K40513th Page of 60TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 13th
GOVERNMENT REGULATION The production, distribution and sale of many of Seven-Up/RC's products are subject to the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act, the Occupational Safety and Health Act, various Federal environmental statutes and various other Federal, state and local statutes regulating the production, sale, safety, advertising, labeling and franchising of beverages. California imposes a recycling fee on all containers of carbonated beverages. The fee is $.025 per container holding 24 ounces or less and $.05 per container holding 25 ounces or more, which may automatically be increased if target recycling rates are not reached. Containers of carbonated beverages must clearly display specific information, which informs consumers that the fee will be used exclusively for recycling efforts. Seven-Up/RC is required to pay the fee, but it is included on the invoice for products and assessed to the consumer at the retail level. Seven-Up/RC believes that future fee increases will be minimal because of the success of California's recycling program. However, a significant increase in the fee could materially decrease consumption of carbonated beverages in California. Substantially all of Seven-Up/RC's facilities are subject to federal, state and local laws regulating the environment. Compliance with these laws has not had any material effect upon the capital expenditures, net income or competitive position of Seven-Up/RC. Costs of compliance with existing and future environmental laws cannot be predicted with any degree of certainty and may significantly affect Seven-Up/RC's operations. Seven-Up/RC does not presently sell products in any state that requires deposits on bottle or can containers, but operating costs could be significantly affected if a national container deposit law were to be implemented. -12-
10-K40514th Page of 60TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 14th
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES Seven-Up/RC's headquarters are located in Vernon, California, and it owns two combination manufacturing and distribution facilities, located in Vernon, California and Albuquerque, New Mexico and one manufacturing facility located in Buena Park, California. Seven-Up/RC has eleven additional distribution facilities, of which six are owned (located in Bakersfield, Orange, San Diego, San Fernando and Santa Maria, California and Las Vegas, Nevada) and five are leased (located in Fresno, El Centro, Oxnard, Redlands and Vernon, California). The leased facilities are subject to customary commercial leases with terms expiring between 1997 and 2003. Seven-Up/RC believes that its owned and leased facilities are sufficient to meet its operating requirements in the foreseeable future. -13-
10-K40515th Page of 60TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 15th
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS Seven-Up/RC is not a party to any legal proceedings other than those that occur in the normal course of business. -14-
10-K40516th Page of 60TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 16th
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS Seven-Up/RC did not submit any matter to a vote of its security holders during the fourth quarter of 1996. -15-
10-K40517th Page of 60TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 17th
PART II ITEM 5. MARKET FOR THE REGISTRANTS' COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS Prior to September 6, 1996 (on or about such date), there was no established public trading market for the common stock of Seven-Up/RC (the "Common Stock"). On or about September 6, 1996, the Common Stock began trading on the over-the-counter market under the symbol "SURC" and prices were quoted in the Pink Sheets (the "Pink Sheets") operated by the National Quotation Bureau Inc. Shortly thereafter, the Common Stock was listed on the OTC Bulletin Board. The following table sets forth on a per share basis, for the periods indicated, the high and low sales prices of the Common Stock as reported in the Pink Sheets and on the OTC Bulletin Board. Such over-the-counter market quotations in the Pink Sheets and the OTC Bulletin Board reflect inter-dealer prices, without retail mark-up, mark-down or commission and may not necessarily represent actual transactions. [Download Table] Price Range -------------------- High Low -------------------- Fiscal 1996: Third Quarter $ 10.13 $ 9.00 Fourth Quarter 11.88 9.13 Fiscal 1997: First Quarter (through March 31, 1997) 12.00 9.88 Since August 15, 1996 (the date on which the Company emerged from bankruptcy), the Company has not declared or paid cash dividends on the Shares. As of March 31, 1997, there were approximately 29 record holders of the Common Stock. -16-
10-K40518th Page of 60TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 18th
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA The following table sets forth selected financial data for Seven-Up/RC. The data for the periods from January 1, 1996 through August 15, 1996 and from August 16, 1996 through December 31, 1996 and for the years ended December 31, 1995 and 1994, and the data as of December 31, 1995 and 1996, were derived from the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and should be read in conjunction with those financial statements and notes thereto. The financial statements were audited by Arthur Andersen LLP, independent public accountants, whose report with respect thereto appears elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. [Enlarge/Download Table] Reorganized Company /(a)/ Predecessor Company /(a)/ ------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- 8/16 - 12/31 1/1 - 8/15 Years Ended December 31, ------------- ----------- --------------------------------------------------------------- 1996 1996 1995 1994 1993 1992 ------------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ------------ (Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data) Statement of Operations Data: Net sales $ 91,647 $202,844 $ 396,725 $413,840 $ 371,062 $ 374,460 Cost of goods sold 74,058 164,320 334,942 342,336 299,735 295,481 Administrative, marketing and general expenses 13,575 27,841 47,935 48,437 47,342 49,876 Depreciation and amortization 3,688 10,399 18,180 17,251 17,983 18,428 Restructure charges - 547 5,015 - - - -------- -------- --------- -------- --------- --------- Operating income (loss) 326 (263) (9,347) 5,816 6,002 10,675 Interest expense 838 12,871 23,057 21,626 19,938 21,222 Other income, net /(b)/ 50 34,309 210 95 418 1,236 -------- -------- --------- -------- --------- --------- (Loss) income before income taxes, reorganization expense and extraordinary items (462) 21,175 (32,194) (15,715) (13,518) (9,311) Reorganization expense /(c)/ - 13,011 - - - - Provision for income taxes - 345 - 185 - - -------- -------- --------- -------- --------- --------- (Loss) income before extraordinary items (462) 7,819 (32,194) (15,900) (13,518) (9,311) Extraordinary (gain) loss /(d)/ - (54,577) - - 826 11,223 -------- -------- --------- -------- --------- --------- Net (loss) income $ (462) $ 62,396 $ (32,194) $(15,900) $ (14,344) $ (20,534) ======== ======== ========= ======== ========= ========= Loss per common share: Net loss per common share $ .09 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - ======== ======== ========= ======== ========= ========= Weighted average common shares outstanding 5,077 - - - - - ======== ======== ========= ======== ========= ========= Balance Sheet Data: Working capital, as defined /(e)/ $ 8,153 - $ 16,054 $ 36,238 $ 34,858 $ 38,489 Property, plant and equipment, net 56,790 - 79,945 87,388 83,447 87,496 Total assets 121,370 - 192,133 243,834 210,198 212,407 Total long-term debt (less current portion) /(f)/ 21,983 - - 189,442 173,883 168,873 Stockholders' equity (deficit) 52,663 - (61,333) (29,139) (13,239) 1,105 Other Data: Capital expenditures $ 3,356 $ 5,228 $ 5,208 $ 5,138 $ 5,446 $ 4,742 -17-
10-K40519th Page of 60TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 19th
(a) On May 13, 1996, Seven-Up/RC and its immediate holding company parent, Beverage Group Acquisition Corporation, filed voluntary petitions for reorganization relief under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code in U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware. On August 15, 1996, the Plan of Reorganization was consummated and Seven-Up/RC emerged as a reorganized company from Chapter 11. Due to the reorganization and implementation of fresh start reporting, the Consolidated Financial Statements for the new reorganized company (period starting August 16, 1996) are not comparable to those of the predecessor company. The predecessor company included Seven-Up/RC and Puerto Rico through the date of disposition, June 30, 1996. (b) For the period January 1, 1996 through August 15, 1996, the amount consists of five elements: 1) $31,715,000 related to the gain on the sale of Puerto Rico; 2) $1,200,000 from Quaker Oats relating to the termination of the Snapple contract manufacturing agreement; 3) $686,000 from the Plastic Recycling Corporation of California for prior year overcharges relating to plastic containers produced in California but shipped out-of-state; 4) $597,000 gain on the property exchange of the Las Vegas distribution facility with the Rio Hotel; and 5) $161,000 of income associated with a Puerto Rican joint venture and gain on sale of fixed assets. (c) The 1996 reorganization expense consists of three elements: 1) $7,207,000 write-down of goodwill associated with fixed life franchise agreements, other intangibles, pallets and shells; 2) $4,904,000 of legal and other professional fees incurred in implementing the Plan of Reorganization; and 3) $900,000 of other reorganization expense including employee severance and relocation expense of the Carson distribution facility due to the reorganization related termination of the facility lease. (d) The 1996 extraordinary gain of $54,577,000 consists of two items: 1) $55,087,000 of extraordinary gain resulting from the discharge of indebtedness relating to the old Senior Secured Notes ($140,000,000) and accrued interest ($24,756,000) offset by the securities principal payment from the sale of Puerto Rico ($55,000,000), the market value of the Common Stock exchanged for the old debt ($52,062,000) and the write-off of old debt issuance costs ($2,607,000); and 2) $510,000 relating to the write-off of old revolver debt issuance and collateral fees. The 1993 extraordinary items consist of accrued expenses for a prepayment premium and the write-off of deferred financing charges related to the revolving credit facilities replaced in February 1994. The 1992 extraordinary items consist of two transactions in connection with the recapitalization on August 11, 1992: 1) the write-off of $7,762,000 of debt issuance costs which was associated with debt which was retired early; and 2) a prepayment premium to the holder of Seven-Up/RC's senior subordinated notes of $3,461,000. (e) Working capital, as defined, represents current assets (excluding cash and cash equivalents) less current liabilities (excluding current portion of long-term debt). (f) All debt of Seven-Up/RC was classified as current at December 31, 1995, the amount of long-term debt reclassified to the current portion was $187,445,000. -18-
10-K40520th Page of 60TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 20th
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS Seven-Up/RC's primary measurement of unit volume is DSD cases. DSD case volume is defined as physical cases of beverage sold, including both ready-to- serve premix and postmix fountain products that are sold in bulk containers. Liquitrend's case volume is not combined in Seven-Up/RC's DSD case volume, but is included in net sales, cost of goods sold, and operating income. Liquitrend's net sales fluctuate from year to year based on the nature of the typical contract manufacturing contract which is negotiated on a month-to-month or quarter-to-quarter basis. Liquitrend's gross margins are significantly less than the gross margins for DSD because Liquitrend revenue is based solely on a contract manufacturing fee that is slightly more than the actual cost incurred for direct labor and indirect plant costs associated with the incremental Liquitrend case volume. The Liquitrend business is important to Seven-Up/RC's operating income because the incremental revenue offsets a significant portion of the fixed costs associated with the excess production capacity that exists during the non-summer months with cyclically lower DSD case volume. COMPARISON OF SEVEN-UP/RC'S 1996 RESULTS OF OPERATIONS WITH SEVEN-UP/RC'S 1995 RESULTS OF OPERATIONS The following table set forth consolidated sales, cost of goods sold, administrative, marketing and general expenses, interest expense and net income for the twelve months ended December 31, 1996 and 1995. To facilitate a meaningful comparison of Seven-Up/RC's operating performance for these periods, the operations of the predecessor company and the reorganized company have been combined. Additionally, the Company's Reorganization and recent restructuring resulted in the elimination and/or downsizing of several product lines, including the operations of Puerto Rico, Avalon, Snapple DSD, Snapple Liquitrend and Cott Liquitrend. For purposes of analysis, these product lines have been eliminated in the following tables to arrive at comparable sales, cost of goods sold and administrative, marketing and general expenses. [Enlarge/Download Table] Predecessor Reorganized -------------- ---------------- 1/1 - 8/15 8/16 - 12/31 Combined 1996 1996 1996 1995 -------------- ---------------- ---------- --------- (Dollar amounts in thousands) Consolidated net sales $202,844 $91,647 $ 294,491 $396,725 Less: Puerto Rico 37,935 82,256 Avalon 1,542 24,485 Hot-Fill Liquitrend 9,665 25,700 Cott Liquitrend 1,067 4,784 Snapple DSD - 15,620 --------- -------- Comparable sales $ 244,282 $243,880 ========= ======== Consolidated net sales decreased to $294,491,000 in 1996 from $396,725,000 in 1995, or (26%). This decrease of $102,234,000 was due primarily to the implementation of Seven-Up/RC's Plan of Reorganization which included the disposition of its Puerto Rico subsidiary ($44,321,000) and the elimination of the unprofitable businesses of Avalon warehouse distribution ($22,943,000), Hot- Fill Liquitrend ($16,035,000) and Cott Liquitrend ($3,717,000). Additionally, Southern California's core DSD net sales were impacted $15,620,000 due to the termination of the Snapple distribution agreement with the Quaker Oats Company for the Southern California counties of Orange and San Bernardino during the fourth quarter of 1995. -19-
10-K40521st Page of 60TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 21st
Comparable net sales increased to $244,282,000 in 1996 from $243,880,000 in 1995. DSD case volume increased 3% (when adjusted to exclude the loss of Snapple DSD volume) due to the Company's philosophy to become more price competitive in the major grocery chain segment and the addition of the Mistic trademark (natural teas and juices) which is owned by Triarc (owner of the Royal Crown trademark). The higher selling price associated with the Mistic trademark offset the costs associated with increased promotional activity in the major grocery chain segment, resulting in net sales increasing slightly in 1996 as compared to 1995. [Enlarge/Download Table] Predecessor Reorganized -------------- ---------------- 1/1 - 8/15 8/16 - 12/31 Combined 1996 1996 1996 1995 -------------- ---------------- ---------- --------- (Dollar amounts in thousands) Consolidated cost of goods sold $74,058 $164,320 $238,378 $334,942 Less: Puerto Rico 30,857 65,925 Avalon 1,511 22,511 Hot-Fill Liquitrend 10,400 27,654 Cott Liquitrend 984 4,051 Snapple DSD - 14,480 -------- -------- Comparable cost of goods sold $194,626 $200,321 ======== ======== Consolidated cost of goods sold decreased to $238,378,000 in 1996 from $334,942,000 in 1995, or (29%). This decrease of $96,564,000 was due primarily to the implementation of Seven-Up/RC's Plan of Reorganization which included the disposition of its Puerto Rico subsidiary ($35,068,000) and the elimination of the unprofitable businesses of Avalon warehouse distribution ($21,000,000), Hot- Fill Liquitrend ($17,254,000) and Cott Liquitrend ($3,067,000). Additionally, Southern California's DSD cost of goods sold were impacted $14,480,000 due to the termination of the Snapple distribution agreement with the Quaker Oats Company for the Southern California counties of Orange and San Bernardino during the fourth quarter of 1995. Comparable cost of goods sold decreased to $194,626,000 in 1996 from $200,321,000 in 1995. This decrease of $5,695,000 reflects the efficiencies that were realized in the core DSD business from the successful implementation of the Plan of Reorganization and its direct impact on reducing both direct and indirect operating expenses. [Enlarge/Download Table] Predecessor Reorganized -------------- ---------------- 1/1 - 8/15 8/16 - 12/31 Combined 1996 1996 1996 1995 -------------- ---------------- ---------- --------- (Dollar amounts in thousands) Consolidated administrative, marketing and general expenses $13,575 $ 27,841 $ 41,416 $ 47,935 Less: Puerto Rico 2,687 6,312 Avalon 134 1,851 Hot-Fill Liquitrend - - Cott Liquitrend - 273 Snapple DSD - 120 -------- -------- Comparable administrative, marketing and general expenses $ 38,595 $ 39,379 ======== ======== -20-
10-K40522nd Page of 60TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 22nd
Consolidated administrative, marketing and general expenses decreased to $41,416,000 in 1996 from $47,935,000 in 1995, or (14%). This decrease of $6,519,000 was due primarily to the implementation of Seven-Up/RC's Plan of Reorganization which included the disposition of its Puerto Rico facility ($3,625,000) and the elimination of the unprofitable businesses of Avalon warehouse distribution ($1,717,000) and Cott Liquitrend ($273,000). Additionally, Southern California's DSD administrative, marketing and general expenses were impacted $120,000 due to the termination of the Snapple distribution agreement with the Quaker Oats Company for the Southern California counties of Orange and San Bernardino during the fourth quarter of 1995. Comparable administrative, marketing and general expense decreased to $38,595,000 in 1996 from $39,379,000 in 1995. This decrease of $784,000 represents primarily the reduction of administrative support employees that were eliminated as part of the downsizing segment of the Plan of Reorganization. [Enlarge/Download Table] Predecessor Reorganized -------------- ---------------- 1/1 - 8/15 8/16 - 12/31 Combined 1996 1996 1996 1995 -------------- ---------------- ---------- --------- (Dollar amounts in thousands) Consolidated interest expense $ 838 $ 12,871 $13,709 $23,057 Consolidated interest expense decreased to $13,709,000 in 1996 from $23,057,000 in 1995. This reduction of $9,348,000 was due primarily to the cancellation of the Senior Secured Notes pursuant to the Reorganization. [Enlarge/Download Table] Predecessor Reorganized -------------- ---------------- 1/1 - 8/15 8/16 - 12/31 Combined 1996 1996 1996 1995 -------------- ---------------- ---------- --------- (Dollar amounts in thousands) Consolidated other income (expense) $34,309 $ 50 $ 34,359 $ 210 Consolidated other income increased to $34,359,000 in 1996 from $210,000 in 1995. This increase of $34,149,000 consists of the following five elements: 1) $31,715,000 related to the gain on the sale of Puerto Rico; 2) $1,200,000 received from Quaker Oats relating to the termination of the Snapple contract manufacturing agreement; 3) $686,000 from the Plastic Recycling Corporation of California for prior year overcharges relating to plastic containers produced in California but shipped out-of-state; 4) $597,000 gain realized on the property exchange of the Las Vegas distribution facility with the Rio Hotel; and 5) $49,000 of decreased other income relating to a Puerto Rican joint venture. Reorganization expense of $13,011,000 represents those costs incurred with the implementation of the Plan of Reorganization and consists of the following three elements: 1) $7,207,000 write-down of goodwill associated with fixed life franchise agreements, other intangibles, pallets and shells; 2) $4,904,000 of legal and professional fees incurred in implementing the Plan of Reorganization; 3) $900,000 of other reorganization expense including employee severance and relocation expense of the Carson distribution branch due to the reorganization related termination of the facility lease. Extraordinary gain of $54,577,000 represents the net recognition of income associated with the cancellation of indebtedness relating to the implementation of the Plan of Reorganization and consists of the following: $140,000,000 gain resulting from discharge of indebtedness relating to the Senior -21-
10-K40523rd Page of 60TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 23rd
Secured Notes and a $24,756,000 gain resulting from the forgiveness of the accrued interest on the Senior Secured Notes, offset by the $55,000,000 securities principal payment from the sale of Puerto Rico, the $52,062,000 market value of Common Stock exchanged for the Senior Secured Notes, the $2,607,000 write-off of old deferred financing costs and. a $510,000 write-off of the old revolver debt issuance and collateral fees. [Download Table] Predecessor Reorganized -------------- ---------------- 1/1 - 8/15 8/16 - 12/31 Combined 1996 1996 1996 1995 -------------- ---------------- ---------- --------- (Dollar amounts in thousands) Consolidated net income (loss) $ (432) $ 62,396 $ 61,934 $(32,194) Consolidated net income increased to $61,934,000 in 1996 from a loss of $32,194,000 in 1995. This variance of $94,128,000 consists primarily of the following six elements, as set forth above: 1) $9,410,000 increase in operating income which includes a $4,468,000 reduction in restructuring expense; 2) $9,348,000 reduction in interest expense; 3) other income of $34,149,000 which includes a $31,715,000 gain on the sale of Puerto Rico; 4) reorganization expense of $13,011,000 relating to the implementation of the Plan of Reorganization; 5) provision for income taxes of $345,000; and 6) extraordinary gain of $54,577,000 which represents the net recognition of income associated with the cancellation of indebtedness relating to the implementation of the Plan of Reorganization. COMPARISON OF THE COMPANY'S 1995 RESULTS OF OPERATIONS WITH THE COMPANY'S 1994 RESULTS OF OPERATIONS Total net sales decreased to $396,725,000 in 1995 from $413,840,000 in 1994, or 4.1%. This decrease was due to a net sales decrease of $29,163,000 at Southern California that was partially offset by a $12,048,000 net sales increase at Puerto Rico. Southern California's performance in 1995 was negatively impacted by a reduction in DSD case volume, reduced hot-fill contract packing sales and reduced sales of private label products. Puerto Rico's net sales increase was primarily the result of increased Snapple beverage sales. Net sales of Southern California's DSD product line decreased to $235,466,000 in 1995 from $252,961,000 in 1994, or 6.9%, due to a case sales decrease of 13.0%, which was greater than the market-wide reduction of measured carbonated soft drink (CSD) sales. This decrease was primarily the result of (i) Southern California's decision to increase its pricing during 1995 to offset raw material price increases, (ii) reduced levels of franchisor-supported price promotions, and (iii) aggressive competitive CSD pricing and promotional activity in this market. DSD net sales at Puerto Rico increased to $80,625,000 in 1995 from $69,768,000 in 1994, or 15.6%. This net sales increase was primarily the result of an approximate $12,500,000 increase in New Age and malta beverage sales, offset by a carbonated DSD soft drink sales decrease of approximately $1,643,000. Liquitrend's net sales increased to $56,149,000 in 1995 from $54,075,000 in 1994, or 3.8%. Restated to reflect approximately $13,683,000 of contractual raw material purchase increases, which had no impact on operating results as cost of goods sold was increased by a like amount, net sales decreased to $42,466,000 or 21.5%. As part of Seven-Up/RC's restructuring effort, hot-filled products will be downsized which will reflect lower sales in the future. Avalon's net sales decreased to $24,485,000 in 1995 from $37,036,000 in 1994, or 33.9%. This decrease was due to Southern California's decision to discontinue Avalon's DSD operation during the second quarter of 1995 and significantly lower sales of Southern California's value-priced Royal Island and Nehi products. Management believes that the factors that caused Southern California's net sales to decrease in 1995 are likely to continue in the foreseeable future. -22-
10-K40524th Page of 60TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 24th
Cost of goods sold decreased to $334,942,000 in 1995 from $342,336,000 in 1994, or 2.2%. This decrease was primarily the result of lower direct material costs, variable transportation and production expenses associated with the net sales reduction in Southern California's operations, and the fourth quarter impact of Southern California's permanent work force reduction announced September 11, 1995. Offsetting this decrease were significant direct material increases related to Puerto Rico's net sales increase and Liquitrend's $13,683,000 contractual raw material cost increase offset by its corresponding sales increase. Administrative, marketing and general expenses decreased to $47,935,000 in 1995 from $48,437,000 in 1994, or 1.0%. This decrease was primarily the result of the fourth quarter impact of Southern California's permanent 205 employee work force reduction announced September 11, 1995. Partially offsetting this decrease were increased legal and litigation expenses, higher worker's compensation expense and increased expenses related to customer required implementation of delivery and invoicing information systems in Southern California. Puerto Rico's administrative, marketing and general expenses increased, primarily the result of variable marketing expenses related to its New Age and malta product sales increase. Interest expense increased to $23,057,000 in 1995 from $21,626,000 in 1994, or 6.6%, the result of higher interest rates on Seven-Up/RC's revolving credit facilities and an increase in the average borrowings outstanding. For the reasons set forth above, Seven-Up/RC's net loss before restructuring charges of $5,015,000, increased to $27,179,000 in 1995 from $15,900,000 in 1994, or 70.9%. The $5,015,000 restructuring charge includes approximately $2,459,000 of professional fees and expenses, $906,000 of charges in connection with severance costs associated with a work force reduction and $1,660,000 of costs related to certain equipment and real estate lease terminations. On September 11, 1995, Southern California announced a permanent reduction in its work force of 205 employees, divided almost equally between salary and hourly. -23-
10-K40525th Page of 60TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 25th
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES The table below sets forth a consolidated statement of cash flows for the twelve months ended December 31, 1996 and 1995. To facilitate a meaningful comparison of Seven-Up/RC's liquidity and capital resources for these periods, the cash flow for operating activities, investing activities and financing activities for the predecessor company and reorganized company for 1996 have been combined. [Enlarge/Download Table] Predecessor Reorganized -------------- ---------------- 1/1 - 8/15 8/16 - 12/31 Combined 1996 1996 1996 1995 -------------- ---------------- ---------- --------- (Dollar amounts in thousands) Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities $ 36,398 $(14,553) $ 21,845 $ 5,767 Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities 64,354 (3,316) 61,038 (5,091) Net cash (used in) provided financing activities (103,825) 18,806 (85,019) (1,709) --------- -------- -------- -------- NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH $ (3,073) $ 937 $ (2,136) $ (1,033) ========= ======== ======== ======== Seven-Up/RC's operating activities provided $21,845,000 of net cash in 1996 as compared to $5,767,000 in 1995. This change of $16,078,000 was due primarily to $9,348,000 of lower interest expense, resulting from the suspension of interest accruals following the Company's filing for reorganization relief under Chapter 11 of the bankruptcy code on May 13, 1996, and non-recurring other income of $2,483,000 which was due to $1,200,000 from the termination of the Snapple contract manufacturing agreement, $686,000 from the prior year refund of plastic recycling fees and $597,000 from the property exchange of the Las Vegas distribution branch with the Rio Hotel. Additionally, Seven-Up/RC generated a significant contribution from working capital with the implementation of its Plan of Reorganization to reduce inventory SKU's and to improve its accounts receivable days outstanding by changing the timing of its major chain promotional programs. Seven-Up/RC's investing activities provided $61,038,000 of net cash in 1996 as compared to a $5,091,000 use of net cash in 1995. This change of $66,129,000 was due primarily to net proceeds of $69,456,000 resulting from the sale of the Puerto Rico franchise territory as part of the Plan of Reorganization to provide a payment of principal to the holders of the Senior Secured Notes. Seven- Up/RC's investing activities in 1996 included $8,584,000 in purchases of property, plant and equipment as compared to $5,208,000 in 1995. Seven-Up/RC's financing activities used $85,019,000 of net cash in 1996 as compared to $1,709,000 of net cash used in 1995. This change of $83,310,000 was primarily due to the use of proceeds from the sale of the Puerto Rico franchise territory to pay $55,000,000 to the holders of the Senior Secured Notes, $8,686,000 to pay down the Southern California revolving loan as an offset to restructuring and reorganization expenses incurred in 1996 and 1995, and the $8,563,000 pay off of the Puerto Rico revolving line of credit. Additionally, net cash provided by operating activities enabled the repayment of $3,793,000 of the term loan, capital leases and debt issuance costs, and a decrease in its net borrowings under the revolving credit facilities by $8,977,000. Seven-Up/RC's unused revolving credit facility was $8,797,000 at December 31, 1996. As of March 28, 1997, and the printing of this document, Seven-Up/RC's unused revolving credit facility was $5,998,000. Seven-Up/RC believes that the continued implementation of its five-year reorganization plan will provide ample borrowing availability through its revolving credit facility. -24-
10-K40526th Page of 60TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 26th
RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS In March 1995, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued SFAS No. 121. The Statement requires that long-lived assets and certain identifiable intangibles to be held and used by an entity be reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. The Company adopted SFAS No. 121 in the first quarter of 1996. The adoption did not have an impact on the Company's financial position or its results of operations. In November 1995, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued SFAS No. 123 "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation." This new standard encourages, but does not require, companies to recognize compensation expense for grants of stock, stock options, and other equity instruments based on a fair-value method of accounting. Companies that do not choose to adopt the new expense recognition rules of SFAS No. 123 will continue to apply the existing accounting rules contained in Accounting Principles Board Opinion (APBO) No. 25, but will be required to provide pro forma disclosures of the compensation expense determined under the fair-value provisions of SFAS No. 123, if material. The Company adopted SFAS No. 123 in the first quarter of 1996 electing to follow the accounting provisions of APBO No. 25 for stock-based compensation and to furnish the pro forma disclosures required under SFAS No. 123, if material. In March, 1997, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued SFAS No. 128 "Earnings per Share" and SFAS No. 129 "Disclosure of Information about Capital Structure." SFAS No. 128 eliminates several requirements of APBO No. 15, simplifying earnings per share calculations. The Company is required to adopt SFAS No. 128 in the first quarter of 1997. As of December 31, 1996, the adoption of SFAS No. 128 would not have a material impact on the Company's financial position or its results of operations. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS On February 28, 1997, Seven-Up/RC entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the "Merger Agreement") with Dr Pepper Bottling Company of Texas ("Dr Pepper Bottling") whereby DPB Acquisition Corp., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Dr Pepper Bottling (the "Purchaser") has made an offer to purchase all the issued and outstanding shares of the Company for $12.00 per share (the "Offer"). The Offer is conditioned upon, among other things, (i) there being validly tendered and not withdrawn prior to the expiration date for the Offer that number of shares of Common Stock which would represent, on a fully-diluted basis, at least 65% of the outstanding Common Stock, (ii) receipt by the Purchaser of sufficient funds from its financing sources, and (iii) the receipt of certain identified consents. -25-
10-K40527th Page of 60TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 27th
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA The response to this item is submitted as a separate section of this report on page F-1. -26-
10-K40528th Page of 60TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 28th
ITEM 9. CHANGES OF AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE There were no changes of or disagreements with Seven-Up/RC's accountants during 1996. -27-
10-K40529th Page of 60TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 29th
PART III ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT Set forth below are the names, positions and ages of the directors, executive officers and key employees of Seven-Up/RC as of December 31, 1996. [Download Table] Age December 31, Name 1996 Position(s) --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Barton S. Brodkin 55 Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and President Richard D. Ferguson 40 Executive Vice President/Chief Financial Officer Roy S. Breneman 55 Executive Vice President/Chief Sales and Marketing Officer Louis Janicich 59 Senior Vice President of Administration/Legal Services, Chief Human Resources Officer F. L. Joseph Chalmers Senior Vice President of Operations Jack R. Attwood 67 Director William C. Langley 58 Director M. L. Lowenkron 65 Director Daniel D. Villanueva 58 Director Barton S. Brodkin began his career in the soft drink industry in 1967 with the Pepsi-Cola Bottling Company, where he held various sales and marketing positions, ultimately becoming Group Marketing Manager. He joined Westinghouse's Beverage Group in 1973 as Vice President of the Western Division and in 1980 was promoted to Business Unit President and General Manager. He is a director of and has served as President of the Seven-Up Bottlers Association and is current Treasurer of the National Soft Drink Association and a director of the RC Bottlers Association. Richard D. Ferguson has been with the Company since 1979 and has held various positions of increasing importance in accounting and finance. He has held the position of Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer since October 1996 and was previously the Vice President of Financial and Business Planning. Roy S. Breneman began his career in the soft drink industry in 1968 as a merchandising manager with the Pepsi-Cola Company. He served as Vice President, General Manager for the Dr Pepper bottler in Dallas and was National Sales Manager for the Country Time ready-to-drink division of General Foods Corporation. He joined Westinghouse's Beverage Group as Vice President of Marketing Services and became Senior Vice President of Sales and Marketing in 1986. Louis Janicich has been involved in human resources in the soft drink industry since 1967 as Director of Industrial Relations with the Pepsi-Cola Bottling Company of Los Angeles. He joined Westinghouse's Beverage Group as Director of Industrial Relations in 1970 and in 1987 assumed his current position of Senior Vice President of Human Resources. F.L. Joseph Chalmers joined Westinghouse in 1969 and held various positions in purchasing and operations. He joined Westinghouse's Beverage Group in 1976 and has held various positions of increasing importance in purchasing, sales and operations. He assumed his current position as Senior Vice President of Operations in June 1996. -28-
10-K40530th Page of 60TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 30th
Jack R. Attwood, a director of the Company since 1990, joined the Coca-Cola Bottling Company of Los Angeles in 1953 and served in various positions until his retirement in 1986. From 1966 to 1970 he was Vice President of Advertising and from 1970 to 1971 he was Vice President of Marketing. In 1971, he was named Senior Vice President and General Manager of the soft drink division. In 1976, he was appointed Executive Vice President, and in 1981 was appointed President and Chief Operating Officer. In 1984, he was appointed Corporate Senior Vice President of the Beverage Group, US Food Segment of Beatrice Companies, Inc. and became Chairman of the Board of the Coca-Cola Bottling Company of Los Angeles. He is a director of Sports Chalet, Inc. and several private companies. William C. Langley became a director of the Company in August 1996. From 1991 to 1996, Mr. Langley was Executive Vice President, Chief Credit and Risk Policy Officer, Chemical Bank and Chemical Banking Corporation and Executive Vice President of Chase Manhattan Corporation from April to July 1996. Mr. Langley is a director of the Chase Preferred Capital Corporation and Morrison Knudsen Corporation. M. L. Lowenkron became a director of the Company in August 1996. From 1980 to 1993 Mr. Lowenkron was President and Chief Executive Officer of A&W Brands, Inc. and from 1995 to June 1996, President and Chief Executive Officer of Heileman Brewing Co. Inc. Mr. Lowenkron is a director for Hat Brands, Inc., Triarc Companies and DePux, Inc. Daniel D. Villanueva became a director of the Company in August 1996. Since 1990 Mr. Villanueva has been Chairman and managing Director of Bastion Capital Corporation and from 1988 to 1990 was General manager of a Los Angeles Univison affiliate, KMEX-TV. At present, all Directors are elected and serve until a successor is duly elected and qualified or until his or her earlier death, resignation or removal. There are no family relationships between any of the Directors or executive officers of the Company. ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION [Enlarge/Download Table] Annual Compensation ------------------------------------------ Name and All other Principal Position Year Salary Bonus Compensation/(1)/ -------------------------------------- --------- ----------- ---------- ----------------- Barton S. Brodkin 1996 $ 316,098 $ 667,083 $ 9,091 Chairman of the Board 1995 300,000 54,000 7,933 President and Chief 1994 275,580 53,573 12,120 Executive Officer Roy S. Breneman 1996 $ 127,824 $ 115,325 $ 5,400 Chief Sales and Marketing 1995 138,960 - 14,785 Officer, and Executive Vice 1994 133,920 - 17,740 President Louis Janicich 1996 $ 129,600 $ 116,856 $ 16,880 Senior Vice President of Human 1995 128,295 - 165,413 /(2)/ Resources and Secretary 1994 123,660 - 22,421 Richard Ferguson 1996 $ 94,271 $ 78,333 $ 6,000 Chief Financial Officer and 1995 77,100 - - Executive Vice President 1994 75,120 - - F.L. Joseph Chalmers 1996 $ 117,060 $ 83,465 $ 3,720 Senior Vice President of 1995 110,685 - 3,720 Operations 1994 106,680 - 3,720 -29-
10-K40531st Page of 60TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 31st
(1) Represents amounts paid by the Company for life insurance premiums, automobile reimbursement and employer matched 401(k) payments. Includes contributions by the Company to the Company's target benefit defined contribution plan on behalf of each of the named executives for 1994 and 1995. Contributions by the Company under this plan were suspended for 1996. (2) Includes funds received from termination of the 401-E program that was previously reported as bonus for this employee. DIRECTOR COMPENSATION Directors who are not employees of Seven-Up/RC receive an annual director's fee of $20,000 in addition to $1,000 per meeting attended and are reimbursed for meeting related expenses. EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT At a meeting held on October 31, 1996 of the Personnel & Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors (the "Compensation Committee"), which committee is comprised of Jack Attwood and Monroe L. Lowenkron, the Compensation Committee recommended that the Board of Directors review and evaluate the employment agreement between the Company and Bart S. Brodkin, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company. After a series of negotiations between the Compensation Committee and Mr. Brodkin, on January 22, 1997, the Company entered into a Second Amended and Restated Management Agreement with Mr. Brodkin (the "Brodkin Agreement"). The annual compensation payable by the Company to Mr. Brodkin under the Brodkin Agreement is $400,000. The Brodkin Agreement expires on December 31, 1999, subject to automatic one-year renewals unless terminated upon written notice by either party at least 90 days prior to the end of the year or earlier upon Mr. Brodkin's death, Disability, resignation, retirement, or removal for Cause (as such capitalized terms are defined in the Brodkin Agreement). In addition, the Brodkin Agreement provides for severance benefits to be paid in a lump sum by the Company to Mr. Brodkin upon a Change of Control (as defined in the Brodkin Agreement). The Brodkin Agreement was amended by a First Amendment to Management Agreement, dated as of February 28, 1997 (the "First Amendment"). The First Amendment shall only become effective immediately prior to the purchase of Common Stock by the Purchaser in the Offer and shall be of no further force or effect if the Merger Agreement is terminated. The execution and delivery of the First Amendment was a condition to the execution and delivery of the Merger Agreement by Dr Pepper Bottling. The First Amendment, will, among other things, significantly amend certain of the provisions regarding severance payments to, and continued fringe benefits for, Mr. Brodkin following the termination of his employment. In this regard, the special provisions requiring the Company to pay to Mr. Brodkin an amount equal to three times his base salary and bonus and to maintain certain benefits for him for 36 months if his employment is terminated under certain circumstances following a Change of Control (as defined in the Brodkin Agreement) will be eliminated. In addition, under the First Amendment, the circumstances constituting Good Reason (as defined in the Brodkin Agreement) under which Mr. Brodkin may resign and obtain severance benefits will be significantly narrowed and certain procedural requirements for the benefit of Mr. Brodkin that would have been applicable if he had been terminated under certain circumstances constituting Cause (as defined in the Brodkin Agreement) will be terminated. The First Amendment will also eliminate Mr. Brodkin's right to receive certain severance payments in the event that he resigns other than for Good Reason (as defined in the Brodkin Agreement). Pursuant to the First Amendment, the automatic extension under the Brodkin Agreement is limited to one additional year, such extension still being subject to neither party giving contrary notice. The First Amendment will not alter the base salary provided under the Brodkin Agreement or Mr. Brodkin's rights to participate in the Company's annual bonus program. The foregoing is a summary of the Brodkin Agreement and the First Amendment. Such Summary is qualified in its entirety by reference to the text of the Brodkin Agreement and the First Amendment, copies of which are filed as exhibits to this Annual Report on Form 10-K. -30-
10-K40532nd Page of 60TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 32nd
On February 10, 1997, the Company entered into Management Agreements with each of Rick Ferguson and Roy Breneman (the "Ferguson Agreement" and the "Breneman Agreement", respectively). Each of the Ferguson Agreement and the Breneman Agreement provides for severance benefits to be paid by the Company in a lump sum to Messrs. Ferguson and Breneman, respectively, upon a Change of Control (as defined in each of the Ferguson Agreement and the Breneman Agreement). The Ferguson Agreement was amended by a Termination Agreement dated as of February 28, 1997 (the "Ferguson Contract Termination Agreement"). The execution and delivery of the Ferguson Contract Termination Agreement was a condition to the execution and delivery of the Merger Agreement by Dr Pepper Bottling. The Ferguson Contract Termination Agreement shall only become effective immediately prior to the purchase of Shares by the Purchaser in the Offer and shall be of no further force or effect if the Merger Agreement is terminated. In the event that the provisions of the Ferguson Contract Termination Agreement become effective, the Ferguson Agreement will be terminated and will cease to be of any further force and effect. The foregoing is a summary of the Ferguson Agreement, as amended by the Ferguson Contract Termination Agreement, and the Breneman Agreement. Such summary is qualified in its entirety by reference to the text of the Ferguson Agreement, as amended by the Ferguson Contract Termination Agreement, and the Breneman Agreement, copies of which are filed as exhibits to this Annual Report on Form 10-K, and are each incorporated herein by reference. STOCK OPTION PLANS Pursuant to the terms and conditions of the Reorganization Plan, the Company granted, on February 3, 1997, options to purchase Shares at an exercise price of $7.30 per Share, to its executive officers (collectively, the "Management options") as follows: Rick Ferguson, options to purchase 32,000 Shares; Joe Chalmers, options to purchase 22,000 Shares; Lou Janicich, options to purchase 22,000 Shares; Roy Breneman, options to purchase 22,000 Shares; Tom Theriault, options to purchase 22,00 Shares; Derrick Snider, options to purchase 13,800 Shares; Tom Holborow, options to Purchase 13,800 Shares; Jose Mejia, options to purchase 5,500 Shares; Steve Walb, options to purchase 5,500 Shares; and Bart Brodkin, options to purchase 160,549 Shares. Upon the exercise of the stock purchase warrant held by WB Bottling Corporation and pursuant to anti-dilution provisions contained in such stock purchase warrant, the holders of Management Options shall receive additional options pursuant to anti-dilution provisions contained in the Management Options. Such additional options shall be granted as follows: Rick Ferguson, options to purchase 1,800 Shares; Joe Chalmers, options to purchase 1,250 Shares; Lou Janicich, options to purchase 1,250 Shares; Roy Breneman, options to purchase 1,250 Shares; Tom Theriault, options to purchase 1,250 Shares; Derrick Snider, options to purchase 775 Shares; Tom Holborow, options to purchase 775 Shares; Jose Mejia, options to purchase 300 Shares; Steve Walb options to purchase 300 Shares; and Bart Brodkin, options to purchase 8,980 Shares. The foregoing is a summary of the Management Options. Such summary is qualified in its entirety by reference to the text of each Management Option, the form of which is filed as an exhibit to this Annual report on Form 10-K, and is incorporated herein by reference. At a meeting of the Compensation Committee held on October 31, 1996, the Compensation Committee resolved to recommend to the Board of Directors that a stock option plan be approved for certain managers and directors of the Company. On January 30, 1997, the Compensation Committee made their recommendations to the Board of Directors and the Board of Directors authorized, approved, and adopted the terms and conditions of the 1996-1997 Stock Option Plan (the "Stock Option Plan"). Pursuant to the terms and conditions of the Stock Option Plan, on February 4, 1997, the Company granted options to purchase Shares, at an exercise price of $8.00 per Share, to its executive officers and directors (collectively, the "Employee/Director Options" and, together with the Management Options, the "Options") as follows: Rick Ferguson, options to purchase 13,900 Shares; Joe Chalmers, options to purchase 10,250 Shares; Lou Janicich, options to purchase 10,250 Shares; Roy Breneman, options to purchase 6,850 Shares; Tom Theriault, options to purchase 10,250 Shares; Derrick Snider, options to purchase 8,300 Shares; Tom Holborow, options to purchase 8,300 Shares; Jose Mejia, options to purchase 2,150 Shares; Steve Walb, options to purchase 2,150 Shares; Bart Brodkin, options to purchase 225,622 Shares; Jack Attwood, options to purchase 21,000 Shares; Monroe Lowenkron, options to purchase 21,000 Shares; William -31-
10-K40533rd Page of 60TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 33rd
Langley, options to purchase 21,000 Shares; and Daniel Villanueva, options to purchase 21,000 Shares. The foregoing is a summary of the Stock Option Plan and the Employee/Director Options. Such summary is qualified in its entirety by reference to the text of the Stock Option Plan, and the Employee/Director Options, copies of which are filed as exhibits to this Annual Report on Form 10-K, and are each incorporated herein by reference. -32-
10-K40534th Page of 60TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 34th
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT The following table sets forth certain information, as of February 28, 1997, with respect to the beneficial ownership of Shares by (i) all persons known by the Company to be the beneficial owners of more than 5% of the outstanding Shares (as derived solely from the Company's review of Schedules B, D, and 13G on file with the Securities and Exchange Commission and from correspondence received from certain stockholders of the Company), (ii) each director of the Company, (iii) the Chief Financial Officer and the four other most highly compensated executive officers of the Company as of February 28, 1997, whose total annual compensation for the year ended December 31, 1996, exceeded $100,000, and (iv) all executive officers and directors of the Company as a group. [Download Table] Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership Percent Name and Address of of Common of Class Beneficial Owner Stock /(1)/ ------------------------------------ --------------- ------------ Dean Witter Intercapital Inc. /(2)/ 1,854,805 30.91% 2 World Trade Center New York, NY 10048 Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. /(3)/ 763,000 12.71% World Financial Center, North Tower 250 Vesey Street New York, NY 10281 Metropolitan Life Insurance 605,500 10.09% Company /(4)/ One Madison Avenue New York, NY 10010 Barton S. Brodkin /(5)/ 395,151 /(6)/ 6.58% Richard D. Ferguson /(5)/ 47,700 /(7)/ * Louis Janicich /(5)/ 33,500 /(8)/ * F.L. Joseph Chalmers /(5)/ 33,500 /(9)/ * Roy S. Breneman /(5)/ 30,100 /(10)/ * Jack Attwood /(5)/ 21,000 /(11)/ * William C. Langley /(5)/ 21,000 /(11)/ * M.L. Lowenkron /(5)/ 21,000 /(11)/ * Daniel D. Villanueva /(5)/ 21,000 /(11)/ * All executive officers and 719,101 /(12)/ 11.98% directors as a group (14 Persons) ---------------- * Less than 1%. (1) Except as indicated in the footnotes to this table, the persons named in the table have sole voting and investment power with respect to all Shares shown and beneficially owned by them, subject to community property laws, where applicable. -33-
10-K40535th Page of 60TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 35th
(2) All Shares are owned by the following funds for which Dean Witter Intercapital Inc. acts as investment advisor: Dean Witter High Yield Securities (456,055 Shares); Dean Witter High Income Securities (490,000 Shares); High Income Advantage Trust (140,000 Shares); High Income Advantage Trust II (175,000 Shares); High Income Advantage Trust III (70,000 Shares); Dean Witter Diversified Income Trust (322,675 Shares); and Variable Investment Series -- High Yield (201,075 Shares). (3) All Shares may also be deemed to be beneficially owned by Merrill Lynch Group, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc., Princeton Services, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Merrill Lynch Group, Inc., Fund Asset Management, L.P., a limited partnership of Princeton Services, Inc. is a general partner, and Merrill Lynch Corporate Bond Fund, Inc. (High Income Portfolio), a registered investment company advised by Fund Asset Management, L.P. (4) All Shares may also be deemed to be beneficially owned by State Street Research & Management Company, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Metropolitan Life Insurance Company and a registered investment advisor. (5) The business address of such person is c/o Seven-Up/RC Bottling Company of Southern California, Inc. 3220 East 26th Street, Vernon, California 90023. (6) Represents Shares subject to non-qualified options and includes 8,980 Shares subject to non-qualified options exercisable pursuant to certain anti-dilution provisions contained in the stock purchase warrant held by WB Bottling Corporation and pursuant to certain anti-dilution provisions contained in the letter agreement evidencing the grant of such non- qualified options to executive. (7) Represents Shares subject to non-qualified options and includes 1,800 Shares subject to non-qualified options exercisable pursuant to certain anti-dilution provisions contained in the stock purchase warrant held by WB Bottling Corporation and pursuant to certain anti-dilution provisions contained in the letter agreement evidencing the grant of such non- qualified options to executive. (8) Represents Shares subject to non-qualified options and includes 1,250 Shares subject to non-qualified options exercisable pursuant to certain anti-dilution provisions contained in the stock purchase warrant held by WB Bottling Corporation and pursuant to certain anti-dilution provisions contained in the letter agreement evidencing the grant of such non- qualified options to executive. (9) Represents Shares subject to non-qualified options and includes 1,250 Shares subject to non-qualified options exercisable pursuant to certain anti-dilution provisions contained in the stock purchase warrant held by WB Bottling Corporation and pursuant to certain anti-dilution provisions contained in the letter agreement evidencing the grant of such non- qualified options to executive. (10) Represents Shares subject to non-qualified options and includes 1,250 Shares subject to non-qualified options exercisable pursuant to certain anti-dilution provisions contained in the stock purchase warrant held by WB Bottling Corporation and pursuant to certain anti-dilution provisions contained in the letter agreement evidencing the grant of such non- qualified options to executive. (11) Represents Shares subject to non-qualified options. (12) Represents Shares subject to non-qualified options and includes 17,930 Shares subject to non-qualified options exercisable pursuant to certain anti-dilution provisions contained in the stock purchase warrant held by WB Bottling Corporation and pursuant to certain anti-dilution provisions contained in the letter agreement evidencing the grant of such non- qualified options to executive. -34-
10-K40536th Page of 60TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 36th
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS Monroe L. Lowenkron, a director of the Company, serves on the Board of Directors of the Triarc Companies, the parent company of Royal Crown Cola Co. and Mistic Brands, Inc. The Company purchases extracts and concentrates (and finished products) from both such companies pursuant to the franchise agreements. In 1996, purchases from both such companies totaled approximately $8,844,000. The Company from time to time incurs trade debt in the ordinary course of business for purchases of extracts and concentrates (and finished products) from such companies. Management believes that the terms of such trade debt are no less favorable to the Company than the terms of trade debt granted by such companies to other of their respective franchisee companies. -35-
10-K40537th Page of 60TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 37th
PART IV ITEM 14. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K (a) The following documents are filed as a part of this report: 1. The financial statements and schedule listed in the "Index to Financial Statements." [Download Table] Number Description ------ ----------- 2.1 First Amended Joint Plan of Reorganization of Seven-Up/RC Bottling Company of Southern California, Inc. and Beverage Group Acquisition Corporation, dated as of June 19, 1996.* 3.1 Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Seven-Up/RC Bottling Company of Southern California, Inc.* 3.2 By-Laws of Seven-Up/RC Bottling Company of Southern California, Inc.* 10.1 Stock Purchase and Sale Agreement among Seven-Up/RC Acquisition Corporation, Seven-Up/RC Bottling Company of Southern California, Inc. and Seven-Up/RC Bottling Company of Puerto Rico, Inc., dated as of May 3, 1996.** 10.2 Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of February 28, 1997, by and among Seven-Up/RC Bottling Company of Southern California, Inc., Dr Pepper Bottling Company of Texas, and DPB Acquisition Corp.*** 10.3 Second Amended and Restated Management Agreement, dated as of January 22, 1997, by and between Seven-Up/RC Bottling Company of Southern California, Inc. and Bart S. Brodkin, as amended by the First Amendment to Management Agreement, dated as of February 28, 1997.*** 10.4 Management Agreement, dated as of February 10, 1997, by and between Seven-Up/RC Bottling Company of Southern California, Inc. and Rick Ferguson, as amended by the Termination Agreement, dated as of February 28, 1997.*** 10.5 Management Agreement, dated as of February 10, 1997, by and between Seven-Up/RC Bottling Company of Southern California, Inc. and Roy Breneman.*** 10.6 Form of Option Agreement, dated as of February 3, 1997, by and between Seven-Up/RC Bottling company of Southern California, Inc. and certain executive officers of the Company.*** 10.7 1996-1997 Stock Option Plan.*** 10.8 Form of Option Agreement, dated as of February 4, 1997, by and between Seven-Up/RC Bottling Company of Southern California, Inc. and certain executive officers and directors of the Company.*** 10.9 Confidentiality Agreement, dated as of February 26, 1997, by and between Seven-Up/RC Bottling Company of Southern California, Inc. and Dr Pepper Bottling Company of Texas.*** 10.10 Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of August 15, 1996, among Seven- Up/RC Bottling Company of Southern California, Inc. and certain holders of Common Stock.* 10.11 Credit Agreement, dated as of August 2, 1996, among Seven-Up/RC Bottling Company of Southern California, Inc., General Electric Capital Corporation, and certain other lenders party thereto.* 27 Financial Data Schedule * Incorporated by reference to the Company's Form S-1, as filed on November 22, 1996. ** Incorporated by reference to the Company's Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 1996. *** Incorporated by reference to the Company's Schedule 14D-9, dated March 7, 1997. (b) Reports on Form 8-K: None. -36-
10-K40538th Page of 60TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 38th
SIGNATURES Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized. SEVEN-UP/RC BOTTLING COMPANY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, INC. (Registrant) By /s/ Barton S. Brodkin --------------------------------------- Barton S. Brodkin Chairman of the Board President and Chief Executive Officer Date April 1, 1997 ------------------------------------- Pursuant to the requirement of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities on the dates indicated. [Download Table] By /s/ Barton S. Brodkin Date April 1, 1997 ---------------------------------------- ---------------- Barton S. Brodkin Chairman of the Board President and Chief Executive Officer By /s/ Richard D. Ferguson Date April 1, 1997 ---------------------------------------- ---------------- Richard D. Ferguson Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer By /s/ Jack R. Attwood Date April 1, 1997 ---------------------------------------- ---------------- Jack R. Attwood Director By /s/ William C. Langley Date April 1, 1997 ---------------------------------------- ---------------- William C. Langley Director By /s/ M. L. Lowenkron Date April 1, 1997 ---------------------------------------- ---------------- M. L. Lowenkron Director By /s/ Daniel D. Villanueva Date April 1, 1997 ---------------------------------------- ---------------- Daniel D. Villanueva Director -37-
10-K40539th Page of 60TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 39th
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS [Enlarge/Download Table] Page ------ Report of Independent Public Accountants F-2 Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 1996 and 1995 F-3 Consolidated Statements of Operations for the period from January 1, to August 15, 1996, the period from August 16, to December 31, 1996, and for the years ended December 31, 1995 and 1994 F-4 Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the period from January 1, to August 15, 1996, the period from August 16, to December 31, 1996, and for the years ended December 31, 1995 and 1994 F-5 Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity (Deficit) for the period from January 1, to August 15, 1996, the period from August 16, to December 31, 1996, and for the years ended December 31, 1995 and 1994 F-6 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements F-7 Schedule supporting the financial statements for the period from January 1, to August 15, 1996, the period from August 16, to December 31, 1996 and for the years ended December 31, 1995 and 1994 Schedule II - Valuation and Qualifying Accounts F-22 F-1
10-K40540th Page of 60TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 40th
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of Seven-Up/RC Bottling Company of Southern California, Inc.: We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Seven- Up/RC Bottling Company of Southern California, Inc. (a Delaware corporation) and its subsidiary (collectively, the Company) as of December 31, 1996 and 1995, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity (deficit) and cash flows for the period from January 1, to August 15, 1996, the period from August 16, to December 31, 1996, and for the years ended December 31, 1995 and 1994. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the management of the Company. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. As more fully described in Notes 1 and 3 to the financial statements, on August 15, 1996, the Company emerged from protection under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code pursuant to a Reorganization Plan which was confirmed by the Bankruptcy Court on August 12, 1996. In accordance with AICPA Statement of Position 90-7, the Company adopted "Fresh Start Reporting" whereby its assets, liabilities and new capital structure were adjusted to reflect estimated fair values as of August 15, 1996. As a result, the financial statements for the period subsequent to August 15, 1996, reflect the Reorganized Company's new basis of accounting and are not comparable to the Predecessor Company's pre- reorganization consolidated financial statements. In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Seven-Up/RC Bottling Company of Southern California, Inc. and its subsidiary as of December 31, 1996 and 1995, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for the period from January 1, to August 15, 1996, the period from August 16, to December 31, 1996, and for the years ended December 31, 1995 and 1994, in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. Our audits were made for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic financial statements taken as a whole. The schedule listed in the index to financial statements is presented for purposes of complying with the Security and Exchange Commission's rules and is not part of the basic financial statements. This schedule has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the basic financial statements and, in our opinion, fairly states in all material respects the financial data required to be set forth therein in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole. ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP Los Angeles, California March 31, 1997 F-2
10-K40541st Page of 60TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 41st
SEVEN-UP/RC BOTTLING COMPANY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, INC. Consolidated Balance Sheets (Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share amounts) [Enlarge/Download Table] Reorganized Predecessor Company Company ----------- ---------- as of December 31, 1996 1995 ---------- ---------- ASSETS Current assets: Cash $ 3,813 $ 5,949 Accounts receivable: Trade, net 25,604 42,261 Other 7,692 9,450 Inventories 19,144 24,947 Prepaid expenses 1,875 2,908 -------- -------- Total current assets 58,128 85,515 -------- -------- Property, plant and equipment, net 56,790 79,945 Other assets: Intangible and other assets 6,323 22,844 Debt issuance costs 129 3,829 -------- -------- Total assets $121,370 $192,133 ======== ======== LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT) Current liabilities: Accounts payable $ 18,358 $ 26,568 Accrued expenses 27,804 36,944 Current portion of long-term debt and capital lease obligations 562 189,954 -------- -------- Total current liabilities 46,724 253,466 -------- -------- Long-term debt: Revolving credit facilities 19,021 - Term loan 506 - Capital lease obligations 2,456 - -------- -------- Total long-term debt 21,983 - -------- -------- Stockholders' equity (deficit): Capital stock par value $0.01 a share; authorized 6,000,000 and 1,000 shares, and issued and outstanding 5,000,000 and 1,000 shares, in 1996 and 1995, respectively 50 - Additional capital 53,075 42,557 Retained deficit (462) (103,890) -------- -------- Total stockholders' equity (deficit) 52,663 (61,333) -------- -------- Total liabilities and stockholders' equity (deficit) $121,370 $192,133 ======== ======== The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated balance sheets. F-3
10-K40542nd Page of 60TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 42nd
SEVEN-UP/RC BOTTLING COMPANY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, INC. Consolidated Statements of Operations (Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share amounts) [Enlarge/Download Table] Reorganized Company Predecessor Company ------------ ------------------------------------------------- 8/16 - 12/31 1/1 - 8/15 Years ended December 31, 1996 1996 1995 1994 ------------ ------------ ------------ ---------- Net sales $ 91,647 $202,844 $396,725 $413,840 Cost of goods sold 74,058 164,320 334,942 342,336 --------- -------- --------- --------- Gross profit 17,589 38,524 61,783 71,504 Administrative, marketing 13,575 27,841 47,935 48,437 and general expenses Depreciation and amortization 3,688 10,399 18,180 17,251 Restructure charges - 547 5,015 - --------- -------- --------- --------- Operating income (loss) 326 (263) (9,347) 5,816 Interest expense 838 12,871 23,057 21,626 Other income, net 50 34,309 210 95 --------- -------- --------- --------- Loss before provision for income taxes, reorganization expense and extraordinary items (462) 21,175 (32,194) (15,715) Reorganization expense - 13,011 - - Provision for income taxes - 345 - 185 --------- -------- --------- --------- (Loss) income before extraordinary items (462) 7,819 (32,194) (15,900) Extraordinary items - gain - (54,577) - - --------- -------- --------- --------- Net (loss) income $ (462) $ 62,396 $ (32,194) $ (15,900) ========= ======== ========= ========= Loss per common share: Net loss per common share $ .09 $ - $ - $ - ========= ======== ========= ========= Weighted average common shares outstanding 5,077 - - - ========= ======== ========= ========= The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements. F-4
10-K40543rd Page of 60TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 43rd
SEVEN-UP/RC BOTTLING COMPANY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, INC. Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Dollar amounts in thousands) [Enlarge/Download Table] Reorganized Company Predecessor Company ------------ -------------------------------------------------- 8/16 - 12/31 1/1 - 8/15 Years ended December 31, ------------ ---------- --------------------------- 1996 1996 1995 1994 ------------ ---------- ----------- ---------- CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: Income (loss) before extraordinary items $ (462) $ 7,819 $(32,194) $(15,900) Adjustments to reconcile income (loss) before extraordinary items to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities: Depreciation and amortization 3,688 10,997 20,048 19,209 Equity in earnings of joint venture - (5) (103) (42) (Gain) loss on sales of fixed assets (50) (764) (8) 117 Non cash reorganization expense - 7,207 - - Disposition of capital lease - 548 - - Provision for doubtful accounts 206 836 715 1,025 Cash dividend from investment in joint venture - - - 225 Gain on sale of Puerto Rico - (31,715) - - Changes in assets and liabilities: Accounts receivable 2,197 (1,928) 18,542 (16,616) Inventories (2,763) 419 19,471 (17,737) Prepaids and other 286 4,356 (2,904) (370) Accounts payable (20,114) 20,769 (24,247) 24,345 Accrued expenses 2,459 17,859 6,447 7,414 -------- -------- -------- -------- Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities (14,553) 36,398 5,767 1,670 -------- -------- -------- -------- CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: Proceeds from sale of Puerto Rico - 69,456 - - Proceeds from sales of property, plant and equipment 40 126 117 48 Additions to property, plant and equipment (3,356) (5,228) (5,208) (5,138) -------- -------- -------- -------- Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities (3,316) 64,354 (5,091) (5,090) -------- -------- -------- -------- CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: (Repayments) borrowings of revolving loans, net 19,021 (45,247) (616) 3,687 Payment to Senior Secured Noteholders - (55,000) - - (Repayments of) proceeds from term loan (25) (2,852) (90) 4,286 Payments of debt issuance costs (41) (88) - - Repayments of capital leases (149) (638) (1,003) (1,317) -------- -------- -------- -------- Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities 18,806 (103,825) (1,709) 6,656 -------- -------- -------- -------- NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH 937 (3,073) (1,033) 3,236 CASH, beginning of year 2,876 5,949 6,982 3,746 -------- -------- -------- -------- CASH, end of year $ 3,813 $ 2,876 $ 5,949 $ 6,982 ======== ======== ======== ======== SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION: Cash interest paid $ 616 $ 2,080 $ 13,342 $ 19,811 ======== ======== ======== ======== Purchases of property, plant and equipment through issuance of capital lease obligation $ - $ - $ 555 $ 10,229 ======== ======== ======== ======== The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements. F-5
10-K40544th Page of 60TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 44th
SEVEN-UP/RC BOTTLING COMPANY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, INC. Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity (Deficit) (Dollar amounts in thousands) [Enlarge/Download Table] Total Capital Stock Stockholders' ---------------------- Additional Retained Equity Shares Amount Capital (Deficit) (Deficit) -------- -------- ---------- --------- ------------ REORGANIZED (Notes 1 & 3) August 16 to December 31, 1996 Balance, August 16, 1996 5,000 $ 50 $ 53,125 $ - $ 53,125 Net loss for the period - - - (462) (462) ------- ------ -------- --------- -------- Balance, December 31, 1996 5,000 $ 50 $ 53,125 $ (462) $ 52,663 ======= ====== ======== ========= ======== PREDECESSOR January 1 to August 15, 1996 Balance December 31, 1995 1 $ - $ 42,557 $(103,890) $(61,333) Reorganization (Notes 1 & 3) 99 1 (41,494) 41,494 - New Issue 4,900 49 52,062 - 52,062 Net income for the period - - - 62,396 62,396 ------- ------ -------- --------- -------- Balance, August 15, 1996 5,000 $ 50 $ 53,125 $ - $ 53,125 ======= ====== ======== ========= ======== PREDECESSOR January 1 to December 31, 1995 Balance, December 31, 1994 1 $ - $ 42,557 $ (71,696) $(29,139) Net loss for the period - - - (32,194) (32,194) ------- ------ -------- --------- -------- Balance, December 31, 1995 1 $ - $ 42,557 $(103,890) $(61,333) ======= ====== ======== ========= ======== PREDECESSOR January 1 to December 31, 1994 Balance, December 31, 1993 1 $ - $ 42,557 $ (55,796) $(13,239) Net loss for the period - - - (15,900) (15,900) ------- ------ -------- --------- -------- Balance, December 31, 1994 1 $ - $ 42,557 $ (71,696) $(29,139) ======= ====== ======== ========= ======== The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements. F-6
10-K40545th Page of 60TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 45th
SEVEN-UP/RC BOTTLING COMPANY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (1) NATURE OF BUSINESS AND PRESENTATION OF FINANCIAL INFORMATION ------------------------------------------------------------ GENERAL ------- Seven-Up/RC Bottling Company of Southern California, Inc., a Delaware corporation ("Seven-Up/RC"), is among the largest beverage distributors in the United States, and is the largest bottler of Seven-Up in the United States. Southern California manufactures and distributes a broad range of beverage products in Southern California, Central California, portions of Nevada and New Mexico, and, through its wholly-owned subsidiary Seven-Up/RC Bottling Company of Puerto Rico, Inc. ("Puerto Rico"), Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands. Except as otherwise indicated, Seven-Up/RC and Puerto Rico are collectively referred to as the "Company". The Company has the exclusive right within its territories to manufacture and/or distribute Seven-Up (lemon-lime), Royal Crown (cola), A&W (root beer and cream soda), Sunkist (orange and citrus), Hawaiian Punch (fruit punch), Schweppes (ginger-ale and mixers), Evian (imported still water), Perrier (imported mineral water), Welch's (grape, strawberry and pineapple), Mistic (teas and juices), Yoo-Hoo (chocolate drink) and Snapple (teas and juices). The Company's business strategy is to manufacture and distribute a franchised portfolio of leading trademarked beverages in each beverage flavor category and to create additional sources of revenue through contract manufacturing. The Company's Liquitrend division ("Liquitrend") engages in contract manufacturing, which utilizes the Company's excess production capacity by manufacturing carbonated soft drink products for a variety of small, independent franchisors and retailers selling private label products. PRESENTATION OF FINANCIAL INFORMATION ------------------------------------- On May 13, 1996, Seven-Up/RC and its immediate holding company parent, Beverage Group Acquisition Corporation, filed voluntary petitions for reorganization relief under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware. On August 15, 1996, a reorganization was consummated and Seven-Up/RC emerged as a reorganized company from Chapter 11. Due to the reorganization plan and implementation of fresh start reporting (See Note 3), the financial statements for the new company ("Reorganized Company") for the period starting August 16, 1996 are not comparable to that of the Company prior to August 16 1996, ("Predecessor Company"). Predecessor Company included Seven-Up/RC and Puerto Rico through June 30, 1996, the date of disposition of Puerto Rico. Reorganized Company includes the operations of Seven-Up/RC subsequent to the consummation date. Certain reclassifications have been made to the 1995 financial statements to conform to the 1996 presentation. BANKRUPTCY FILINGS ------------------ As a result of severe liquidity problems, on July 31, 1995, Seven-Up/RC suspended payments of interest on its $140,000,000, 11.5% Senior Secured Notes due 1999 (the "Senior Secured Notes"). At the end of the second quarter of 1995 through the first quarter of 1996, Seven-Up/RC was in violation of certain of its revolving credit facility covenants, including tangible net-worth, interest coverage and fixed charge coverage. At the request of Seven-Up/RC, the revolving credit lender executed forbearance agreements extending through May 15, 1996. F-7
10-K40546th Page of 60TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 46th
On November 9, 1995, Seven-Up/RC announced that it had reached an agreement in principle on the terms of a restructuring of the Senior Secured Notes with an unofficial committee of holders of such notes. The agreement contemplated, among other things, (i) the exchange of the Senior Secured Notes for approximately 98 percent of the equity of Seven-Up/RC, and (ii) the sale of Puerto Rico and the payment to the holders of the Senior Secured Notes of the net proceeds, as defined, from such sale. On May 13, 1996, Seven-Up/RC and its immediate holding company parent, Beverage Group Acquisition Corporation ("BGAC"), filed voluntary petitions for reorganization relief under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code to implement the terms of the restructuring agreement with the committee . On July 1, 1996, Seven-Up/RC sold its wholly owned subsidiary, Puerto Rico, for approximately $74 million which resulted in a net gain of approximately $32 million included in Other Income in the accompanying Statement of Operations. The proceeds from this sale were subsequently used to repay holders of the Senior Secured Notes and reduce Seven-Up/RC's revolving credit facility. On August 2, 1996, the U.S. Bankruptcy Court of the District of Delaware, confirmed the Company's First Amended Joint Plan of Reorganization (the "Reorganization"), and on August 15, 1996, the Company emerged from bankruptcy. Pursuant to the Reorganization, on such date the Senior Secured Notes were canceled in exchange for approximately $55 million in cash and equity securities consisting of 4,900,000 million shares of common stock in Seven-Up/RC. In addition, 100,000 shares of common stock and warrants to purchase an additional 263,158 shares of common stock were issued to the prior owner of BGAC. In the period ended August 15, 1996, Seven-Up/RC wrote off $510,000 of debt issuance costs related to its previous working capital facility and realized a gain of $55 million relating to the discharge of the Senior Secured Notes and related accrued interest in accordance with the Reorganization, the net of which, are reflected as extraordinary items in the accompanying financial statements. (2) SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES ------------------------------------------ PRINCIPLES OF CONSOLIDATION --------------------------- The financial statements of the Predecessor Company reflect the consolidated financial statements of Seven-Up/RC Bottling Company of Southern California, Inc. and, through the date of its disposition (June 30, 1996), its wholly-owned subsidiary, Seven-Up/RC Bottling Company of Puerto Rico, Inc. The financial statements of the Reorganized Company include only the financial statements of Seven-Up/RC. USE OF ESTIMATES IN PREPARATION OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ------------------------------------------------------- The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. CASH ---- Included in accounts payable are $3,958,000 and $9,459,000 of checks outstanding in excess of cash balances at December 31, 1996 and 1995, respectively. For purposes of the statement of cash flows, cash and cash equivalents are defined as cash deposits with original maturities of less than 90 days. F-8
10-K40547th Page of 60TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 47th
TRADE RECEIVABLES, NET ---------------------- Trade receivables, net, include allowances for doubtful accounts of $1,937,000 and $1,814,000 at December 31, 1996 and 1995, respectively. OTHER RECEIVABLES ----------------- Other receivables consist principally of amounts due from franchisors under the terms of marketing and/or purchasing contracts. INVENTORIES ----------- Inventories are recorded at cost, determined on the first-in, first-out method. Elements of cost include direct materials, direct labor and bottling overhead. PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT, NET ---------------------------------- Property, plant and equipment is stated at cost. Depreciation is provided for under the straight-line method using the following lives: Building and improvements 31.5 years Machinery and equipment 7 to 8 years Equipment held under capital leases 6 to 7 years Expenditures for additions and improvements are capitalized, and costs for repairs and maintenance are charged to operations as incurred. The cost and accumulated depreciation of property, plant and equipment retired or otherwise disposed of are eliminated and any resulting gain or loss recognized at the time of disposal. OTHER ASSETS ------------ Intangible assets include the appraised value of specific intangible assets acquired, primarily, beverage franchises and trademarks. The intangible assets are amortized over their useful lives, not to exceed 40 years. The net balance recorded at December 31, 1996 and 1995, includes accumulated amortization of $233,000 and $14,820,000, respectively. In March 1995, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (SFAS) No. 121 "Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets to be Disposed of." (See Note 2 "Recent Accounting Pronouncements".) The Company continually evaluates whether events and circumstances have occurred that indicate the remaining estimated useful life of its intangible assets my warrant revision or that the remaining balance of intangible assets may not be recoverable When factors indicate that intangible assets should be evaluated for possible impairment, the Company uses an estimate of the its undiscounted cash flows over the remaining life of the intangible asset in measuring whether the intangible asset is recoverable. Additionally, other assets are comprised of debt issuance costs incurred in connection with the arrangement of various long-term debt facilities. These costs are amortized over the individual lives of the various debt facilities using the effective interest method. The net balance includes accumulated amortization of $3,493,000 at December 31, 1995. F-9
10-K40548th Page of 60TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 48th
INCOME TAXES ------------ The Company accounted for income taxes using the method prescribed by Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 109 (SFAS 109). Under the asset and liability method of SFAS 109, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. Under SFAS 109, the effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. The measurement of deferred income tax assets is adjusted by a valuation reserve, if necessary, so that the net tax assets are recognized only to the extent they are expected to be realized. The adoption of SFAS 109 had no effect on the Company's financial position. RESTRUCTURING CHARGES --------------------- During 1995, Seven-Up/RC discontinued the operations of its Avalon division, which distributed lower-volume beverage products and downsized the hot-fill operations of its Liquitrend division, which primarily bottled products for companies who did not distribute their products throughout Seven-Up/RC's distribution system. As a result, Seven-Up/RC terminated 205 employees in September, 1995; a reserve of $906,000 was set up for severance pay, of which $56,000 and $850,000 was paid during the years ended December 31, 1996 and 1995, respectively. Also Seven-Up/RC determined that certain leased facilities and equipment were no longer needed and a reserve of $1,660,000 was established to reflect the projected cost of terminating these leases, of which $324,000 was paid by December 31, 1995. The termination of leases in 1996 resulted in an additional restructuring charge of $547,000 in the period ended August 15, 1996. All amounts accrued in connection with lease terminations had been paid by August 15, 1996. Additionally in 1995, Seven-Up/RC incurred costs of $2,449,000 in relation to the negotiation of the restructuring of Seven-Up/RC's obligation under the Senior Secured Notes and the revolving credit facilities; these costs are included in the restructuring charge in the accompanying 1995 consolidated statement of operations. NET LOSS PER COMMON SHARE ------------------------- Net loss per common share is computed on the basis of the weighted average number of common shares outstanding, plus common stock equivalents related to dilutive stock warrants. The number of shares used in the computation of per share data was 5,076,811 in 1996. RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS -------------------------------- In March 1995, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued SFAS No. 121. The Statement requires that long-lived assets and certain identifiable intangibles to be held and used by an entity be reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. The Company adopted SFAS No. 121 in the first quarter of 1996. The adoption did not have an impact on the Company's financial position or its results of operations. In November 1995, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued SFAS No. 123 "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation." This new standard encourages, but does not require, companies to recognize compensation expense for grants of stock, stock options, and other equity instruments based on a fair-value method of accounting. F-10
10-K40549th Page of 60TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 49th
Companies that do not choose to adopt the new expense recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123 will continue to apply the existing accounting provisions contained in Accounting Principles Board Opinion (APBO) No. 25, but will be required to provide pro forma disclosures of the compensation expense determined under the fair-value provisions of SFAS No. 123, if material. The Company adopted SFAS No. 123 in the first quarter of 1996 electing to follow the accounting provisions of APBO No. 25 for stock-based compensation and to furnish the pro forma disclosures required under SFAS No. 123, if material. In March, 1997, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued SFAS No. 128 "Earnings per Share" and SFAS No. 129 "Disclosure of Information about Capital Structure." SFAS No. 128 eliminates several requirements of APBO No. 15, simplifying earnings per share calculations. The Company is required to adopt SFAS No. 128 in the first quarter of 1997. As of December 31, 1996, the adoption of SFAS No. 128 would not have a material impact on the Company's financial position or its results of operations. (3) FRESH START ACCOUNTING ---------------------- As of August 15, 1996, the Company adopted Fresh Start Reporting in accordance with the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants' Statement of Position 90-7 "Financial Reporting by Entities in Reorganization under the Bankruptcy Code," ("SOP 90-7"). Fresh Start Reporting resulted in material changes to the Consolidated Balance Sheet, including valuation of real, intangible and other assets and the valuation of equity based on the appraised reorganization value of the ongoing business. The final reorganization equity value was determined to be approximately $53 million (the approximate fair value) which was established based upon analysis by an independent valuation firm and considered many factors and various valuation methods, including discounted cash flows, selected comparable company multiples, selected acquisition transaction multiples and other applicable ratios and valuation techniques believed by management and its financial advisors to be representative of the Company's business and industry. The Company obtained an independent appraisal of certain property to support the fair values of such assets. The Reorganization and adoption of Fresh Start Reporting resulted in the following adjustments to the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheet for the period ending August 15, 1996. [Enlarge/Download Table] Predecessor Reorganized Company Company ----------- ----------- at Reorganization and at August 15, Fresh Start Adjustments August 15, ----------- --------------------------- ----------- 1996 Debit Credit 1996 ----------- --------- ---------- ----------- ASSETS (Dollar amounts in thousands) Total current assets $120,644 $ - $63,836 /(f)/ $ 56,808 Property, plant and equipment, net 56,914 - 196 /(a)/ 56,718 Other assets: Intangible and other assets 14,038 - 7,011 /(b)/ 7,027 Debt issuance costs 2,695 - 2,607 /(c)/ 88 -------- ------- ------- -------- Total assets $194,291 $ - $73,650 $120,641 ======== ======= ======= ======== F-11
10-K40550th Page of 60TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 50th
[Enlarge/Download Table] LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT) Current liabilities: Accounts payable $ 39,486 $ - $ - $ 39,486 Accrued expenses 49,087 24,756 /(d)/ - 24,331 Current portion of long-term debt 544 - - 544 -------- -------- -------- -------- Total current liabilities 89,117 24,756 - 64,361 -------- -------- -------- -------- Long-term debt 151,991 148,836 /(e)/,/(f)/ - 3,155 -------- -------- -------- -------- Stockholders' (deficit) equity: Additional paid-in capital 42,557 41,494 /(g)/ 52,062 /(g)/ 53,125 Retained deficit (89,374) - 55,087 /(h)/ - 34,287 /(i)/ -------- -------- -------- -------- Total stockholders' (deficit) equity (46,817) 41,494 141,436 53,125 -------- -------- -------- -------- Total liabilities and stockholders' equity $194,291 $215,086 $141,436 $120,641 ======== ======== ======== ======== Explanations of adjustment columns of the balance sheet are as follows: (a) To adjust property, plant and equipment to estimated current market value. The market value of property, plant and equipment has been primarily determined by independent third party appraisal. (b) To primarily reflect the write-off of intangibles and adjust other assets to current market value. (c) To write-off remaining debt issuance costs for the Senior Secured Notes. (d) To reflect the cancellation of accrued interest related to the Senior Secured Notes. (e) To reflect the cancellation of the Senior Secured Notes ($140,000,000). (f) To reflect the paydown of the debtor-in-possession revolving credit facility ($8,836). (g) To reflect the issuance of 5,000,000 shares of new common stock (par value $0.01). (h) To reflect the extraordinary gain resulting from the discharge of indebtedness. This extraordinary gain is calculated below: Historical carrying value of old debt securities $140,000 Historical carrying value of related accrued interest 24,756 Unamortized old debt issuance costs (2,607) Market Value of consideration exchanged for old debt: Plan securities (face value $52,062) (52,062) Senior securities principal payment (55,000) -------- Extraordinary gain $ 55,087 ======== (i) To reflect the elimination of stockholders' equity of the Predecessor Company. F-12
10-K40551st Page of 60TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 51st
In accordance with SOP 90-7, expenses resulting from the Reorganization should be reported separately as reorganization items in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations, and are summarized below: [Download Table] January 1, to August 15, 1996 --------------- Adjustment of assets to fair market value $ 7,207 Financial restructuring costs 5,804 ------- Total $13,011 ======= The following Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Financial Information for the years ended December 31, 1996 and 1995, have been prepared giving effect to the sale of Puerto Rico and the consummation of the Reorganization including adjustments to interest, depreciation expense and asset amortization. The Pro Forma financial information was prepared as if the transactions had occurred on January 1, 1996 and 1995, respectively. This information does not purport to be indicative of the results which would have been obtained had such transaction in fact been completed as of the date hereof and for the periods presented or that may be obtained in the future. Unaudited Pro Forma Financial Information (dollar amounts in thousands): [Enlarge/Download Table] Pro Forma for the Years Ended ----------------------------- December 31, December 31, 1996 1995 ----------------------------- Total revenue $256,556 $314,469 Operating costs and expenses 257,266 323,019 -------- -------- Loss before interest, other income, reorganization expenses and income taxes 710 8,550 Interest, other income, income taxes and reorganization expenses 756 5,463 -------- -------- Net loss $ 1,466 $ 14,013 ======== ======== (4) INVENTORIES ----------- Inventories at December 31, 1996 and 1995, consisted of the following (in thousands): [Download Table] Reorganized Predecessor Company Company ---------------------------- 1996 1995 ----------- ----------- Raw materials $ 5,034 $ 6,198 Finished goods 14,110 18,749 ------- ------- $19,144 $24,947 ======= ======= F-13
10-K40552nd Page of 60TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 52nd
(5) PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT, NET ---------------------------------- Property, plant and equipment, net, at December 31, 1996 and 1995, consisted of the following (in thousands): [Download Table] Reorganized Predecessor Company Company ----------- ----------- 1996 1995 ----------- ----------- Land $21,762 $ 22,477 Buildings and improvements 12,194 23,994 Machinery and equipment 22,586 71,911 Equipment held under capital leases 2,709 12,816 Construction in progress 860 480 ------- -------- 60,111 131,678 Accumulated depreciation (3,101) (49,246) Capital lease depreciation (220) (2,487) ------- -------- $56,790 $ 79,945 ======= ======== (6) ACCRUED EXPENSES ---------------- Accrued expenses at December 31, 1996 and 1995, consisted of the following (in thousands): [Download Table] Reorganized Predecessor Company Company ----------- ----------- 1996 1995 ----------- ----------- Accrued marketing programs $ 9,001 $ 4,496 Accrued interest 146 14,994 Other accruals 18,657 17,454 ------- ------- $27,804 $36,944 ======= ======= (7) LONG-TERM DEBT -------------- At December 31, 1996 and 1995, the components of long-term debt were (in thousands): [Download Table] Reorganized Predecessor Company Company ----------- ----------- 1996 1995 ----------- ----------- Revolving credit facilities $19,021 $ 37,847 Senior Secured Notes - 140,000 Term loan 589 3,571 Capital lease obligations 2,935 8,536 ------- --------- 22,545 189,954 Less: current portion (562) (189,954) ------- --------- Long term debt, net $21,983 $ - ======= ========= F-14
10-K40553rd Page of 60TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 53rd
REVOLVING CREDIT FACILITIES --------------------------- Upon consummation of the Reorganization on August 15, 1996, the debtor-in- position facility was canceled and the Company entered into a new credit facility (the "Facility") with GE Capital providing for up to $35 million in working capital and letter of credit commitments. Available borrowings on this facility are based on a percentage of certain eligible trade and franchisor receivables and inventory. Interest on the Facility is charged monthly at the GE Capital commercial paper rate (5.28 percent at December 31, 1996) plus 3 percent. Seven-Up/RC is charged a commitment fee for the unused portion of the revolving loan commitments, as well as a letter of credit fee of 2 percent on the face amount of all outstanding letters of credit. There were $3,057,000 in outstanding letters of credit at December 31, 1996. Seven-Up/RC also pays a $50,000 annual collateral monitoring fee on the Facility. In addition, the Facility is also subject to a termination fee of $750,000 if the Facility is terminated prior to the first anniversary of the Closing Date, as defined in the agreement, or a $350,000 fee if terminated prior to the second anniversary of that date. Seven-Up/RC has a lockbox agreement with GE Capital whereby all cash receipts are used to pay down the revolving loans. Borrowings under this are secured by substantially all the Company's assets. At December 31, 1996, the Company was in violation of certain of its revolving credit facility covenants, including interest coverage, fixed charge coverage and capital expenditures. The Company subsequently received a waiver from GE Capital related to the covenant violations. The revolving loans at December 31, 1995, consisted of a $45.0 million revolving loan commitment for Seven-Up/RC; ($29.2 million outstanding) and a $10.0 million revolving loan commitment for Puerto Rico ($8.6 million outstanding). Interest on these revolving loans is charged monthly at the GE Capital Commercial Paper rate (5.68 percent at December 31, 1995) plus 3.5 percent. The average interest rate on the revolving loans in 1995 was 9.34 percent. The Company was charged a commitment fee for the unused portion of the revolving loan commitments plus an annual administration fee and other facility fees. Borrowings under the revolving loan commitments were based on a percentage of certain eligible trade and franchisor receivables and inventory. At December 31, 1995, the Company was in violation of certain of its revolving credit facility covenants, including tangible net worth, interest coverage and fixed-charge coverage. This facility was replaced by the Company with a $54 million debtor-in- possession revolving credit facility upon entering bankruptcy. SENIOR SECURED NOTES -------------------- On August 11, 1992, Seven-Up/RC issued its $140,000,000 aggregate principal amount of 11.5% Senior Secured Notes Due 1999 (the "Senior Secured Notes"). Pursuant to the Reorganization, these notes were canceled in exchange for approximately $55 million in cash and 4,900,000 shares of common stock of the Reorganized Company (see Note 1). TERM LOAN --------- Seven-Up/RC's secured amortizing term loan is collateralized by certain specified equipment. The term loan calls for monthly payments of $11,536, including interest, through July, 2002. Interest on this loan is computed at 10.14%. FAIR VALUE OF LONG-TERM DEBT ---------------------------- The fair value of amounts outstanding under the revolving credit facility at December 31, 1996 approximates the carry amount due to the variable nature of the interest rates. In addition, there was no material difference between the fair market value and the carry amount of the remaining long-term debt at December 31, 1996. F-15
10-K40554th Page of 60TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 54th
(8) EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS ---------------------- The Company sponsors two defined contribution plans for all employees other than union members, unless specifically negotiated. The Target Benefit Plan was created effective September 1, 1990, and allows participants to make contributions of 2 percent of their eligible compensation, as defined. The Company's annual contribution is determined by an actuary based upon assumptions of the participant's highest five year average pay, their years of eligible service with the Company, and their vesting status as of their termination date. The 401(k) Plan entitles all employees other than union members, unless specifically negotiated, to participate. The Company matches one-quarter of each participant's contribution up to 6% of the participant's eligible compensation. In September of 1995, the Company suspended its contributions related to the Target Benefit Plan and the 401(k) Plan. In April of 1996, Seven-Up/RC resumed its contributions related to the 401(k) Plan. The following table summarizes the 1996 estimated contributions, and 1995 and 1994 actual contributions for each plan for the applicable periods (in thousands): [Download Table] Target 401(k) Benefit Plan -------------------- Period from January 1, 1996 to August 15, 1996 $ 204 $ 72 Period from August 16, 1996 to December 31, 1996 $ - $ 59 Year ended December 31, 1995 $ 306 $ 160 Year ended December 31, 1994 $ 380 $ 210 Under labor contracts between the Company and certain of its employee unions, the Company contributes to multi-employer union benefit plans which are administered by the applicable unions. The Company has no liability to these plans in excess of the contractually agreed to contribution, which is usually equal to a set charge per hour of eligible service by the union members to the Company. The Company contributed the following amounts to unions on behalf of its employees during the applicable periods (in thousands): [Download Table] Period from January 1, 1996 to August 15, 1996 $ 635 Period from August 16, 1996 to December 31, 1996 $ 282 Year ended December 31, 1995 $ 972 Year ended December 31, 1994 $ 1,017 PUERTO RICO PENSION PLAN ------------------------ Prior to the sale of Puerto Rico, effective June 30, 1996, the Company sponsored the Seven-Up/RC Bottling Company of Puerto Rico, Inc. Pension Plan (the "Puerto Rico Plan"), a contributory defined benefit pension plan for union employees of Puerto Rico. Employees were eligible to participate in the Puerto Rico Plan the first year of the Plan year following the date of employment. Participating employees were required to contribute 3 percent of their compensation in excess of $9,000 in a given calendar year. The following table indicates the actual net pension expense components for the years ended December 31, 1995 and 1994, respectively (in thousands): [Download Table] 1995 1994 ------------------- Service cost component $ 48 $ 85 Interest cost component 248 268 Expected return on plan assets (184) 82 Net amortization and deferral 34 (226) ------ ------ Net pension expense $ 146 $ 209 ====== ====== F-16
10-K40555th Page of 60TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 55th
The assumptions used to develop the components of the above amounts were as follows: [Download Table] 1995 1994 -------- -------- Discount rate 7.50% 8.50% Rate of increase in compensation levels 4.00% 4.00% Expected long-term rate of return on plan assets 9.00% 9.00% The funded status of the Puerto Rico Plan as of January 1, 1995 and 1994 was as follows (in thousands): [Download Table] 1995 1994 -------- -------- Accumulated benefit obligation: Vested $ 2,952 $ 2,504 Non-vested 133 5 ------- ------- $ 3,085 $ 2,509 ======= ======= Present value of projected benefit obligation $(3,739) $(2,830) Fair value of plan assets 2,472 2,012 ------- ------- Present value of projected benefit obligation in excess of plan assets (1,267) (818) Remaining unrecognized net obligation 271 305 Unrecognized net gain 439 74 ------- ------- Accrued pension costs $ (557) $ (439) ======= ======= The Company contributed approximately $25,000 to the Puerto Rico Plan during 1995 and $23,000 during 1994. (9) COMMITMENTS ----------- The Company leases certain office and warehouse facilities, machinery, vehicles and computer equipment under renewable operating leases, expiring from 1997 to 2003. Rental expense under operating lease agreements was approximately $4,434,000, $6,312,000 and $5,027,000 for the years ended December 31, 1996, 1995 and 1994, respectively. The Company also leases certain machinery and equipment under capital leases. Following are the future minimum lease payments under operating and capital leases that have initial or remaining noncancelable lease terms in excess of one year from December 31, 1996 (in thousands): [Download Table] Capital Operating Leases Leases -------- --------- 1997 $ 734 $2,638 1998 734 2,432 1999 734 1,752 2000 734 820 2001 735 681 Thereafter - 643 ------ ------ $8,966 ====== Less -- Amount representing interest (736) ------ Present value of minimum lease payments $2,935 ====== F-17
10-K40556th Page of 60TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 56th
(10) LITIGATION ---------- The Company is involved in various lawsuits and claims incidental to its business. Management believes that any potential liabilities arising from these matters will not have a material effect on its financial position or future results of operations. (11) INCOME TAXES ------------ The Company was included in the consolidated federal and state income tax returns of WB Bottling through August 15, 1996, the date of bankruptcy reorganization, when Seven-Up/RC deconsolidated from the WB Bottling group. Effective September 1, 1990, the Company and WB Bottling entered into a tax sharing agreement, whereby the Company calculated its tax provision on a separate member basis through the date of deconsolidation. Effective August 16, 1996, Seven-Up/RC began filing separate federal and state income tax returns. The components of income (loss) from operations before the provision for income taxes and extraordinary items were as follows (in thousands): [Download Table] Reorganized Company Predecessor Company ----------- --------------------------------------- 8/16-12/31 1/1-8/15 December 31, December 31, 1996 1996 1995 1994 ----------- -------- ------------ ------------ Domestic $(462) $8,780 $(32,566) $(15,975) Foreign - (616) 372 260 ----- ------ -------- -------- Total $(462) $8,164 $(32,194) $(15,715) ===== ====== ======== ======== The components of income tax expense after utilization of net operating loss carryforwards are summarized below (in thousands): [Download Table] 8/16-12/31 1/1-8/15 1996 1996 ---------- -------- Provision for income taxes: Taxes currently payable ----------------------- Federal $ - $ 95 State - 25 Foreign - 45 ----- ----- Total $ - $ 165 ----- ----- Deferred taxes -------------- Federal $ - $ 180 State - - ----- ----- Total $ - $ 180 ----- ----- Total provision $ - $ 345 ===== ===== F-18
10-K40557th Page of 60TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 57th
The following is a reconciliation of income taxes calculated at the United States statutory federal income tax rate to the Company's provision for income taxes before extraordinary items (in thousands): [Enlarge/Download Table] Reorganized Company Predecessor Company ----------- ------------------------------------------------------ 8/16-12/31 1/1-8/15 December 31, December 31, 1996 1996 1995 1994 ----------- --------- ------------ ------------ U.S. federal income tax provision (benefit) at statutory rate on income (loss) from operations $(157) $ 2,776 $(11,072) $(3,765) Foreign income tax provision - 45 - 185 Nondeductible reorganization expenses - 1,414 - - Sale of Puerto Rico subsidiary - (5,742) - - Increase (decrease) in deferred tax asset valuation allowance 144 1,663 11,072 3,765 Other, net 13 189 - - ----- ------- -------- ------- Provision (benefit) for income taxes $ - $ 345 $ - $ 185 ===== ======= ======== ======= At December 31, 1996 and December 31, 1995, the approximate amounts of deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities resulting from temporary differences and carryforwards were as follows (in thousands): [Download Table] Reorganized Predecessor Company Company as of as of December 31, December 31, 1996 1995 ------------ ------------ Current deferred tax assets and (liabilities): Difference in inventory basis $ 1,001 $ 880 Deferred compensation, pension and other arrangements 61 169 Accrued vacation and sick pay 759 814 Accrued expenses 788 811 Reserve for Workers' Compensation 1,362 1,729 Coupon reserve 1,149 221 Capital lease expense (202) (829) Restructuring charges 363 548 Other 181 579 ------- -------- $ 5,462 $ 4,922 Less: Valuation allowance (5,462) (4,922) ------- -------- Net current deferred tax assets and (liabilities) $ - $ - ======= ======== Non-current deferred tax assets and (liabilities): Net operating loss carryforward $ 4,756 $ 28,415 Accelerated depreciation and amortization 4,378 (410) Other (including AMT credit carryforwards) 133 (212) ------- -------- $ 9,267 $ 27,793 Less: Valuation allowance (9,267) (27,793) ------- -------- Net non-current deferred tax assets and (liabilities) $ - $ - ======= ======== F-19
10-K40558th Page of 60TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 58th
During 1996, the deferred tax asset decreased by $17,986 resulting primarily from the tax effect of a reduction in the domestic tax operating loss carryforwards due to cancellation of indebtedness in connection with the bankruptcy reorganization and the taxable income for the period ended August 15, 1996. This decrease was partially offset by the tax effect of the write-down of property, equipment, intangibles and other assets to current market value pursuant to SOP 90-7. Due to the uncertainty as to the realizability of the deferred tax assets, the Company has established valuation allowances in accordance with SFAS 109 to reduce the asset. Internal Revenue Code Sections 382 and 383 impose a limitation on the usage of pre-reorganization domestic tax return net operating loss (NOL) carryforwards and other tax attributes when there is a change of ownership. A change of ownership resulted from the bankruptcy reorganization on August 15, 1996. At December 31, 1996, the Company had a pre-reorganization federal tax return NOL carryforward of approximately $13.5 million available to offset future taxable income. The usage of this pre- reorganization NOL carryforward is limited to $3.1 million a year because of the change of ownership. In addition, the Company had a NOL carryforward of approximately $0.6 million attributable to the post-reorganization period that is not subject to limitation. The NOL carryforwards will expire from 2010 to 2011. The alternative minimum tax credit, although subject to the change of ownership limitation, has no expiration date. To the extent the Company realizes a tax benefit as a result of future reductions in the valuation allowance related to the utilization of pre- reorganization deferred tax assets, the fresh start accounting rules of SOP 90-7 provide for the reporting of such benefits first by reducing identifiable intangible assets existing at the date of the fresh start and then, once those assets are reduced to zero, by increasing equity. These tax benefits will not reduce income tax expense. However, the Company will realize a cash benefit from utilization of the "pre-reorganization benefits" against any future tax liabilities. (12) CAPITAL STOCK ------------- The certificate of incorporation in Delaware authorizes 6,000,000 shares of $.01 per value common stock. Upon Consummation of the Plan, WB Bottling Corporation, a privately held Delaware corporation and previously the sole shareholder of BGAC, was granted the right to purchase from the Company (the "Warrant"), 263,158 shares of common stock subject to adjustment as defined, exercisable at an amount per share based upon a formula, as defined. The Warrants are exercisable until December 31, 2001. (13) STOCK COMPENSATION PLANS ------------------------ As part of the Reorganization, options to purchase 319,149 shares of common stock, subject to adjustment as defined, were authorized to be granted to certain members of management of the Company. The purchase price per share is determined based upon a formula defined in the Management Option Agreement. The non-qualified options expire December 31, 2001. On January 30, 1997, the authorized options were granted to certain members of management. On January 30, 1997, the Board of Directors of the Company adopted the Stock Option Plan (the "Plan"). In January 1997, options to purchase 417,693 shares of common stock were granted under the Option Plan. The option exercise price per share of common stock is $8.00. F-20
10-K40559th Page of 60TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 59th
(14) SEGMENT DATA ------------ The Company's subsidiaries operate in the beverage production and distribution business in two separate geographic segments. Information about the Company's operations in these two geographic segments is summarized below (in thousands): [Download Table] Reorganized Company Predecessor Company ---------- ----------------------------------------- 8/16-12/31 1/1-8/15 December 31, December 31, 1996 1996 1995 1994 ---------- --------- ------------ ------------ Net Sales United States $ 91,647 $164,909 $314,469 $343,632 Puerto Rico - 37,935 82,256 70,208 -------- -------- -------- -------- $ 91,647 $202,844 $396,725 $413,840 ======== ======== ======== ======== Operating Profit United States $ 326 $ (2,051) $(14,339) $ 1,290 Puerto Rico - 1,788 4,992 4,526 -------- -------- -------- -------- $ 326 $ (263) $ (9,347) $ 5,816 ======== ======== ======== ======== Identifiable Assets United States $121,370 $120,641 $140,931 $194,545 Puerto Rico - - 51,202 49,289 -------- -------- -------- -------- $121,370 $120,641 $192,133 $243,834 ======== ======== ======== ======== (15) SUBSEQUENT EVENT ---------------- On February 28, 1997, Seven-Up/RC entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the "Merger Agreement") with Dr Pepper Bottling Company of Texas ("Dr Pepper Bottling") whereby DPB Acquisition Corp., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Dr Pepper Bottling (the "Purchaser") has made an offer to purchase all the issued and outstanding shares of the Company for $12.00 per share (the "Offer"). The Offer is conditioned upon, among other things, (i) there being validly tendered and not withdrawn prior to the expiration date for the Offer that number of shares of Common Stock which would represent, on a fully-diluted basis, at least 65% of the outstanding Common Stock, (ii) receipt by the Purchaser of sufficient funds from its financing sources, and (iii) the receipt of certain identified consents. F-21
10-K405Last Page of 60TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 60th
SEVEN-UP/RC BOTTLING COMPANY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, INC. Schedule II - Valuation and Qualifying Accounts (Dollar amounts in thousands) [Enlarge/Download Table] Balance at Balance at Beginning End of of Period Additions Deductions Period --------- --------- ---------- ---------- Allowance for doubtful accounts For the period August 16, through December 31, 1996 $2,070 $ 245 $ (378) $1,937 ====== ====== ======= ====== Allowance for doubtful accounts For the period January 1, through August 15, 1996 $1,814 $1,299 $(1,043) $2,070 ====== ====== ======= ====== Allowance for doubtful accounts For the year ended December 31, 1995 $1,428 $ 715 $ (329) $1,814 ====== ====== ======= ====== Allowance for doubtful accounts For the year ended December 31, 1994 $1,192 $1,025 $ (789) $1,428 ====== ====== ======= ====== F-22

Dates Referenced Herein   and   Documents Incorporated by Reference

Referenced-On Page
This ‘10-K405’ Filing    Date First  Last      Other Filings
12/31/0158
12/31/9931
Filed on:4/7/97SC 14D1/A
4/1/9738
3/31/97140NT 10-K
3/28/9725
3/7/9737SC 14D1,  SC 14D9
2/28/972659
2/26/9737
2/13/9712
2/10/973237
2/4/973237
2/3/973237
1/30/973258
1/22/973137
For Period End:12/31/96160NT 10-K
11/22/9637S-1
10/31/963132
9/6/9617
8/16/961856
8/15/963608-K
8/12/96408-A12G/A
8/2/963746
7/1/9646
6/30/96195410-Q
6/19/96337
5/16/963NT 10-Q
5/15/9645
5/13/963468-K
5/3/9637
1/12/967
1/1/961854
12/31/951860
11/9/9546
9/11/9524
7/31/9545
7/28/957
1/1/955155
12/31/941860
1/1/9455
8/11/921953
 List all Filings 
Top
Filing Submission 0000898430-97-001416   –   Alternative Formats (Word / Rich Text, HTML, Plain Text, et al.)

Copyright © 2024 Fran Finnegan & Company LLC – All Rights Reserved.
AboutPrivacyRedactionsHelp — Mon., Apr. 29, 10:52:25.1am ET