Annual Report — Form 10-K
Filing Table of Contents
Document/Exhibit Description Pages Size
1: 10-K 10-K Filing 13± 63K
2: EX-11 Computation of Eps 1 7K
8: EX-12 Earnings to Fixed Charges 1 7K
5: EX-13 Annual Report 38± 145K
3: EX-21 Subsidiaries 1 6K
4: EX-23 Consent of C&L 1 9K
6: EX-27 Financial Data Schedule 1 7K
7: EX-99 Form 11-K 5± 23K
EX-13 — Annual Report
| EX-13 | 1st “Page” of 3 | TOC | ↑Top | Previous | Next | ↓Bottom | Just 1st |
|---|
EXHIBIT 13.1
Portions of the
CHESAPEAKE CORPORATION
Annual Report to Stockholders
For the year ended December 31, 1995
Financial Review 1993-1995
Earnings Overview
[Download Table]
Chesapeake achieved record net sales, earnings and cash flow in 1995.
Net sales for 1995 of $1,233.7 million surpassed the one billion dollar
mark for the first time and were 25% higher than the previous record net
sales of $990.5 million achieved in 1994 and 39% higher than 1993 net sales
of $885.0 million. Net income for 1995 of $93.4 million, or $3.88 a share,
was 2.5 times the $37.6 million, or $1.58 a share, earned in 1994, 9 times
the $10.4 million, or $.44 a share, earned in 1993 and 55% higher than the
previous record earnings achieved in 1988. Cash flow from operations of
$141.0 million was up 40% from last year and was 24% higher than the
previous peak set in 1993. Results for 1995 were favorably impacted by
higher average selling prices for most of the Company's major product
lines, higher margins and higher shipments for the packaging and tissue
businesses.
1993 1994 1995
Graph: Sales by Business Segment 885.0 990.5 1,233.7
(Millions of Dollars)
(Percent)
Packaging 29% 35% 37%
Tissue 32 31 30
Kraft products 39 34 33
Corporate - - -
Total 100 100 100
Chesapeake continues its emphasis on specialty products that the
Company believes have less price volatility and higher growth and
profitability potential than commodity products. Because of strategic
initiatives implemented by management, more than 60% of Chesapeake's total
sales now come from these specialty products. Until the early 1980s,
Chesapeake's products were primarily commodities in slow growth markets.
[Download Table]
1993 1994 1995
Graph: Net Income 10.4 37.6 93.4
(Millions of Dollars)
Liquidity and Capital Structure
Net cash provided by operating activities was a record $141.0 million
in 1995, 40% higher than the $100.4 million generated in 1994. EBIT + D, a
measure of internal cash flow combining earnings before interest, income
taxes and the cumulative effect of accounting changes plus non-cash charges
for depreciation, cost of timber harvested and amortization, was $247.8
million for 1995, 53% higher than 1994's EBIT+D of $162.1 million.
Compared to year-end 1994, working capital decreased $2.0 million to $142.3
million at year-end 1995, as a result of the use of temporary cash
investments to repay debt and an increase in accounts payable and accruals,
offset in part by higher accounts receivable related to stronger sales and
higher inventories related to acquisitions and slower demand at the end of
the year. The ratio of current assets to current liabilities was 2.0 at
year-end 1995 compared to year-end 1994's 2.1 and year-end 1993's 1.9.
Accounts receivable at year-end 1995 increased $13.3 million from year-end
1994, with the average collection period unchanged from last year.
Inventories at the end of 1995 increased $22.7 million compared to year-end
1994. The increase occurred primarily in the packaging and tissue
businesses. The annual inventory turnover rate decreased from 8.6 for 1994
to 8.1 for 1995. Accounts payable and accrued expenses at year-end 1995
increased $9.5 million from year-end 1994 due to acquisitions and the
timing of payments.
[Download Table]
1993 1994 1995
Graph: Income from Operations 44.0 81.1 161.3
(Millions of Dollars)
The Company generally uses long-term debt to fund major capital
expansions that cannot be funded by internally generated funds. Capital
expenditures and acquisitions of $227.4 million in 1995 exceeded net cash
provided by operating activities by $86.4 million. As a result, during 1995
long-term debt increased $29.6 million and Chesapeake used $32.8 million of
temporary cash investments it had at year-end 1994 to fund capital
additions and acquisitions. Additional cash of $28.9 million came from the
sale of the Consumer Products business. See Note 3 to the consolidated
financial statements on page 22 for additional long-term debt information.
Chesapeake's total capitalization was $980.5 million at the end of
1995 compared to $863.5 million at the end of 1994. The year-end ratio of
long-term debt to total capital was 40% for 1995, down from 42% for 1994
and 1993. Chesapeake's long-term debt-to-total-capital ratio target range
is 35% to 45%. The year-end ratio of long-term debt to stockholders'
equity was 84% for 1995, 93% for 1994 and 91% for 1993.
[Download Table]
1993 1994 1995
Graph: Interest Expense 32.0 31.1 30.8
(Millions of Dollars)
During 1995, the Company increased quarterly cash dividends to
$.20 a share from $.18 a share. For the year, dividends were $.78 a share
compared to $.72 a share in 1994. Chesapeake's dividends paid as a
percentage of net cash provided by operating activities were 13% for 1995,
17% for 1994 and 15% for 1993. Outstanding common shares at year-end 1995
totaled 23.8 million shares. Purchases of shares by the Company during 1995
generally offset shares issued for employee benefit plans. No shares were
purchased by the Company under board of directors' stock purchase
authorizations in 1994 or 1993. See Note 7 to the consolidated financial
statements on page 24 for capital stock and additional paid-in capital
information. Year-end 1995 stockholders' equity was $468.3 million, or
$19.68 a share, up 19% over year-end 1994. The market price for
Chesapeake's common stock ranged from $27.50 per share to $39.00 per share
in 1995, with a year-end market price of $29.63 per share.
[Download Table]
1993 1994 1995
Graph: EBIT + D
(Millions of Dollars)
Earnings before interest and
income taxes 52.7 89.3 172.4
Noncash charges for depreciation,
cost of timber harvested and
amortization 71.9 72.8 75.4
Total EBIT + D 124.6 162.1 247.8
Capital Expenditures
Expenditures for property, plant and equipment in 1995 totaled $227.4
million, of which more than 60% were for acquisitions and other growth
related projects. Acquisition costs totaled $69.7 million, and included
the purchase of the assets of the Flagstaff, Ariz. tissue mill, a facility
in upstate New York to be operated as an additional tissue converting plant
and the Chicago tissue mill. The remaining capital expenditures of $157.7
million in 1995 related primarily to the internal expansions of the
packaging and kraft businesses announced in 1994. These expenditures
included: a manufacturing plant located in Visalia, Calif., for the
Company's Color-Box graphic packaging business; additional equipment at the
existing Color-Box plant in Richmond, Ind.; modernization of the North
Tonawanda, N.Y., corrugated container plant; and an upgrade of the No. 2
paper machine at the West Point, Va., kraft products mill. Also, the
Company purchased a site in Bellemont, Ariz., where it is nearing
completion of a tissue converting facility. No other 1995 capital projects
were individually material. Capital spending in 1994 was $87.0 million and
included $33.0 million for the acquisition of five packaging plants. The
remaining capital expenditures for 1994 were focused on maintenance and
reliability rather than growth projects. Capital spending in 1993 was
$64.0 million, of which about one-third related to modifications in the
paper mill and bleach plant areas at the West Point, Va., kraft products
mill.
Planned capital expenditures, including acquisitions, for 1996 are
expected to be approximately $200 million. About one-half of this spending
relates to strategic initiatives in the packaging and tissue businesses.
These initiatives include: a new manufacturing plant in Pelahatchie, Miss.;
the second phase of the Visalia, Calif., manufacturing plant for the
Company's Color-Box graphic packaging business; the planned acquisition of
the Display Division of Dyment Limited; and new tissue converting equipment
at the Bellemont, Ariz., and Greenwich, N.Y., facilities. These projects
are consistent with Chesapeake's strategy of expanding the packaging and
tissue businesses, lowering costs and focusing capital spending on projects
that are expected to have a high return on investment. No other 1996
projects are expected to account for more than 5% of the total planned
spending. Projected capital expenditures are expected to be funded with
internally generated cash supplemented by proceeds from borrowings. See
Note 13 to the consolidated financial statements on page 27 for information
regarding capital commitments.
[Download Table]
1993 1994 1995
Graph: Capital Structure
(Millions of Dollars) 799.7 862.5 980.5
(Percent)
Long-Term Debt 42% 42% 40%
Deferred Taxes 12 12 12
Stockholders' Equity 46 46 48
Total 100 100 100
Operating Results
1995 vs. 1994
Chesapeake's 1995 net sales were a record $1,233.7 million, up 25%
over 1994's net sales of $990.5 million. Higher shipments for the
packaging and tissue segments and greatly improved selling prices for most
major product lines were responsible for the increase. For the fifth
consecutive year, the Company's packaging businesses achieved record
shipments.
Net income for 1995 was a record $93.4 million, or $3.88 a share, up
2.5 times from the $37.6 million, or $1.58 a share, earned in 1994.
Earnings for 1995 included: a pre-tax gain of $1.8 million, or $.05 a share
after tax, from the sale of the Consumer Products business; a $3 million
pre-tax, or $.08 a share after tax, reduction in earnings related to lost
production associated with completion of a paper machine rebuild project at
the West Point, Va., kraft products mill; and onetime pre-tax charges of
$8.0 million, or $.21 a share after tax, associated with an enhanced
retirement package for certain hourly employees at Chesapeake Paper
Products and with certain post-closing obligations related to Chesapeake's
former wood treating operations. Included in 1994 earnings was a pre-tax
charge of $4.4 million, or $.12 a share after tax, reflecting a change in
the method of accounting for certain inventories in the tissue and
packaging segments from the average cost valuation method to the LIFO
valuation method. Also included in 1994 results was a pre-tax charge of
$4.9 million, or $.13 a share after tax, associated with an enhanced
retirement program for certain salaried employees at Chesapeake Paper
Products Company and Chesapeake Forest Products Company.
Income from operations for 1995 was $161.3 million, or nearly twice
1994's $81.1 million. Depreciation increased $2.7 million over the
previous year due to higher capital spending and acquisitions. Income for
1995 was reduced as a result of lost production associated with the paper
machine rebuild project. Operating expenses for 1995 and 1994 included the
charges related to the enhanced retirement programs, while operating
expenses for 1994 included the charge relating to the expansion of the LIFO
method of valuing certain inventories. Cost of products sold increased
$144.2 million, or 20%, from 1994, but as a percentage of net sales dropped
to 70% for 1995 compared to 73% for 1994. Gross profit and operating
margins were up 4% and 5%, respectively, compared to the previous year.
Selling, general and administrative expenses in 1995 increased $16.1
million compared to 1994, but were 11% of net sales in 1995, compared to
12% last year.
[Download Table]
1993 1994 1995
Graph: Net Cash Provided by
Operating Activities 113.6 100.4 141.0
(Millions of Dollars)
Other income, net in 1995 was $11.1 million, up $2.9 million, as a result
of the gains on the sale of Consumer Products and the sale of land that was
no longer considered to be of strategic importance. Interest expense for
1995 was $30.8 million, with no interest capitalized during the year.
Interest expense for 1994, net of $.5 million of capitalized interest, was
$31.1 million. Excluding capitalized interest, interest expense decreased
$.8 million.
[Download Table]
1993 1994 1995
Graph: Total Assets 919.3 1,016.9 1,146.3
(Millions of Dollars)
(Percent)
Goodwill & Other 9% 9% 7%
Current Assets 20 27 25
Property, Plant & Equipment 71 64 68
Total 100 100 100
Packaging
The packaging segment was again the largest in terms of revenue, as
net sales and shipments were at record levels for all three packaging
businesses--point-of-sale displays, graphic packaging and corrugated
shipping containers. Higher margin point-of-sale displays showed the
strongest improvement, continuing the momentum begun in 1994. Net sales of
point-of-sale displays were up 36% and shipments were up 15% compared to
last year. Overall net sales were up 29% compared to 1994. Chesapeake
Packaging's EBIT of $36.9 million for 1995 improved 49% from its EBIT of
$24.7 million for 1994. Packaging results for 1994 include the change in
the method of valuing certain inventories to the LIFO valuation method,
which resulted in a pre-tax charge to operations of $.5 million. The new
graphic packaging plant at Visalia, Calif., which began production late in
the second quarter of 1995, is in full operation. A fourth graphic
packaging facility in Pelahatchie, Miss., is scheduled to be doing business
by mid-1996. Plans have been announced for a new custom packing facility
in Memphis, Tenn., and a letter of intent has been signed to acquire the
Display Division of Dyment Limited, with locations in Erlanger, Ky., and
Toronto, Canada.
Tissue
Wisconsin Tissue's net sales were 23% higher than last year as a
result of higher selling prices, an improved product mix for converted
products and strategic growth initiatives. Selling prices were up 16% from
1994, while tissue shipments of 235,000 tons were 8% higher than last year.
EBIT for 1995 was a record, up 18% over the previous record set in 1994,
despite recovered paper costs adding approximately $30 million in costs
compared to 1994. Recovered paper costs moderated during the second half
of 1995. The change in the method of valuation of raw materials,
work-in-process and finished goods inventories of Wisconsin Tissue from the
average cost method to the LIFO method resulted in a charge of $3.9 million in
1994. Results of the tissue segment in 1994 were positively impacted by a
nonrecurring settlement gain. The Flagstaff, Ariz., mill, purchased in May
1995, successfully began operating in the third quarter and construction on
a new tissue converting facility in the Flagstaff area is nearing
completion. The acquisition of Chicago Tissue was concluded in November
1995. A facility in upstate New York was acquired in the third quarter of
1995, which will operate as an additional tissue converting plant. The
Flagstaff and Chicago acquisitions increased primary tissue production
capacity by 90,000 tons per year, or approximately 50%.
The Consumer Products business achieved its second positive EBIT in
1995, with net sales increasing 5% from 1994. During 1995 Chesapeake
announced its intention to sell this business. Although many improvements
had been made in Consumer Products, resulting in profitability in 1994 and
1995, the Company determined that it had better strategic alternatives
available for its capital. The sale of Consumer Products to The Fonda
Group, Inc. was completed on December 29, 1995.
Kraft Products
EBIT for the kraft products segment was $100.4 million in 1995
compared to $36.1 million in 1994. Earnings for both years include the
charges related to enhanced retirement programs. Earnings for 1995 also
include the charges for post-closing obligations related to the Company's
former treated wood business. Gains on the sale of land no longer
considered to be strategic were $3.7 million in 1995 compared to $.6
million in 1994.
Earnings of Chesapeake Paper Products Company in 1995 improved
significantly from last year due primarily to higher selling prices. Net
sales improved 21% over the prior year as selling prices were up for all
major product lines. Average selling prices were 41% higher than last
year. The largest gains were in market pulp. Shipments of 769,000 tons
were down 10% from 1994 due to lost production associated with a rebuild of
a paper machine and weaker market conditions near the end of 1995. However,
the rebuild of the paper machine has increased production capacity of the
West Point, Va., mill by 70,000 tons per year. Specialty white top
paperboard, which has a higher profit margin than brown paperboard,
increased to 90% of the paperboard mix compared to approximately 83% last
year. Prices of recycled paper, a major raw material, had dropped
significantly by year-end from a mid-year peak, but for the year averaged
50% higher than 1994's levels and added approximately $17 million in
additional costs compared to 1994. A weakening of market conditions for
kraft products is expected to put pressure on earnings of this segment in
early 1996.
Earnings of Chesapeake Building Products declined somewhat from 1994's
excellent results, as lumber markets were weaker for most of the year.
Selling prices and shipments for lumber were down, causing net sales to
decline by 9%.
[Download Table]
1993 1994 1995
Graph: Capital Expenditures 63.9 87.0 227.4
and Acquisitions
(Millions of Dollars)
1994 vs. 1993
Chesapeake's 1994 net sales were a then-record $990.5 million, up 12%
over 1993's net sales of $885.0 million. Improved sales prices for kraft
products and tissue, increased shipments of kraft products and packaging
and improved product mix for tissue accounted for most of the improvement.
Sales from continuing operations were up 16%. Sales of $64.0 million from
Lawless Holding Corporation, acquired in January 1994, partially offset the
absence of $86.0 million in sales during 1993 from the Company's former
treated wood business. For the fourth consecutive year, the Company's
kraft and packaging businesses achieved record shipments.
[Download Table]
1993 1994 1995
Graph: Earnings Per Share .44 1.58 3.88
(Dollars)
Net income for 1994 was $37.6 million, or $1.58 a share, up from $10.4
million, or $.44 a share, earned in 1993. Included in 1994 earnings was a
pre-tax charge of $4.4 million, or $.12 a share after tax, reflecting a
change in the method of accounting for certain inventories in the tissue
and packaging segments from the average cost valuation method to the LIFO
valuation method. Also included was a pre-tax charge of $4.9 million, or
$.13 a share after tax, associated with an enhanced retirement program at
Chesapeake Paper Products Company and Chesapeake Forest Products Company.
Included in 1993 results was an after-tax gain of $3.4 million, or $.15 a
share, resulting from the disposal of certain assets which were no longer
of strategic importance. These transactions included the conveyance of the
assets of the Company's wood treating business to Universal Forest
Products, Inc., the consolidation of a packaging plant at West Des Moines,
Iowa, with one at Sandusky, Ohio, and the sale of approximately 19,000
acres of timberlands. Net income for 1993 also included a charge of $2.4
million, or $.10 a share, to reflect changes in deferred taxes resulting
from the 1993 Revenue Reconciliation Act.
Income from operations for 1994 was $81.1 million, or $37.1 million
greater than in 1993. Depreciation increased less than $1.0 million over
the previous year due to the low capital spending of the previous two
years. Operating expenses in 1994 included the charges relating to the
expansion of the LIFO method of valuing inventories and the enhanced
retirement program for Chesapeake Paper Products and Chesapeake Forest
Products. Operating expenses for 1993 included approximately $2.0 million
relating to the consolidation of two packaging facilities and expenses
relating to the reorganization of the Consumer Products business. Cost of
products sold in 1994 was up $55 million, or 8%, from 1993, and
represented approximately 73% of net sales for 1994 compared to 76% in
1993. Gross profit and operating margins were up 3% in 1994 compared to
the previous year. Selling, general and administrative expenses in 1994
increased $12.7 million compared to 1993, but remained at 12% of net sales.
[Download Table]
1993 1994 1995
Return on Common Stockholders'
Equity 2.8% 10.2% 23.7%
(Percent)
Other income, net in 1994 was $8.2 million as a result of the sale of
land that was no longer considered to be of strategic importance, a
nonrecurring gain from the settlement of an indemnification issue related
to a prior business acquisition, the sale of equipment that was no longer
used by the Company and interest income from cash investments. In the
fourth quarter of 1993, the Company sold approximately 19,000 acres of
timberland holdings that were no longer considered to be of strategic
importance, producing a pre-tax gain of approximately $8.0 million.
Interest expense for 1994, net of $.5 million of capitalized interest, was
$31.1 million, while interest expense for 1993, net of $.4 million of
capitalized interest, was $32.0 million. Excluding capitalized interest,
interest expense in 1994 decreased $.8 million from 1993 due primarily to
lower debt levels.
Income taxes for 1993 included a charge of $2.4 million, or $.10 a
share, to reflect changes in deferred taxes resulting from the 1993 Revenue
Reconciliation Act.
Packaging
Chesapeake Packaging's EBIT for 1994 improved 40% from 1993, as
results improved for two of its three businesses. Compared to 1993, net
sales were up for each business and up 38% overall. Lawless Holding
Corporation, acquired in January 1994, added $64.0 million to sales for the
year, with profitable results that were in line with expectations. Average
sales prices for 1994 were up approximately 5% from 1993. Shipments for
1994 were at then-record levels, with the fastest growth in graphic
packaging, which benefited from the completion late in 1993 of the final
phase of a capital expansion program which doubled the capacity of this
business. Earnings for the corrugated shipping container business were
down slightly in 1994 because rising containerboard prices caused margins
to be down for much of the year. A focus on new end-users, permanent
displays and expanding assembly and packing services contributed to
improvements in the point-of-sale display business in 1994 after several
years of flat sales and earnings. Also contributing were cost savings
realized from the consolidation of the West Des Moines, Iowa, packaging
facility into the Sandusky, Ohio, facility. EBIT of the fast growing
graphic packaging business for 1994 also improved over 1993 levels. During
1994, the Company changed the method of valuation of certain inventories in
the packaging segment to the LIFO valuation method, resulting in a pre-tax
charge to operations of $.5 million.
Tissue
Wisconsin Tissue's EBIT for 1994 was a then-record due to improved
product mix, higher sales prices and high productivity. Shipments of
converted products were up 3% compared to 1993. Overall tissue shipments
in 1994 were 217,000 tons, or 1% below 1993 levels, as fewer nonconverted
parent rolls were sold. Tissue pricing for 1994 was 6% above 1993 levels
as a result of price increases in late 1993 and in 1994 and improved
product mix. Paper machine operating rates averaged at or above 100% and
productivity for the converting operations was excellent. Higher recovered
paper costs during the latter part of the year reduced earnings by
approximately $5 million. During 1994, the Company changed the method of
valuation of raw materials, work-in-process and finished goods inventories
of Wisconsin Tissue from the average cost method to the LIFO method,
resulting in a pre-tax charge of $3.9 million. Results of the tissue
segment in 1994 were positively impacted by a nonrecurring settlement gain.
The Consumer Products business, formed in 1989, achieved its first
positive EBIT in 1994, as the business continued to benefit from the
reorganization efforts of 1992 and 1993 which reduced the variety of
products sold, increased operating efficiencies and reduced overhead. EBIT
of this business for 1994 improved $3.6 million over 1993's loss, and net
sales improved 11% over the prior year. Operating expenses for 1993
included additional costs related to the reorganization.
Kraft Products
EBIT for the kraft products segment was $39.0 million in 1994 compared
to $12.5 million in 1993. Results for 1994 included a $4.9 million charge
for the enhanced retirement program at Chesapeake Paper Products Company
and Chesapeake Forest Products Company, while results for 1993 included a
gain of over $8.0 million related to the sale of land that was no longer
considered to be of strategic importance to the Company. Gains on sales of
non-strategic land totaled $.6 million in 1994. Earnings of Chesapeake
Paper Products Company in 1994 improved significantly from 1993's slight
loss due to higher sales prices, record shipments and improved production
and quality. Containerboard and market pulp price increases implemented
during 1994 resulted in overall prices that were 20% above 1993 levels.
The largest gains came from market pulp. Shipments of kraft products were
a record 850,000 tons, up 6% from the previous record set in 1993.
Production volume for 1994 averaged a record 2,170 good tons per day
compared to 2,018 good tons per day in 1993. Operating rates for the West
Point, Va., mill's four machines averaged at or above 100% in 1994, while
off-quality production was reduced 14% from the prior year. Specialty
white top paperboard increased to 83% of the paperboard mix in 1994
compared to approximately 80% in 1993. Earnings in 1994 were negatively
impacted by higher recycled fiber costs, which caused the West Point mill
to absorb approximately $15.0 million in additional costs compared to 1993.
Earnings of Chesapeake Building Products, formed in 1993 with the
merger of Chesapeake Forest Products' lumber division and Chesapeake Wood
Treating Co., improved over 1993's good results. Net sales increased 16%,
as shipments for the lumber division increased 16% and sales prices for
lumber remained strong. The wood treating portion of this business was
conveyed to Universal Forest Products, Inc. at the beginning of the fourth
quarter of 1993. Net sales of the wood treating business were $86.0
million in 1993.
Other
More information about Chesapeake's businesses is provided under the
caption "Business Segment Highlights" on page iii and in Note 14 to the
consolidated financial statements on page 28.
Environmental
Chesapeake has a strong commitment to protecting the environment. The
Company has an environmental audit program to monitor compliance with
environmental laws and regulations. The Company is committed to abiding by
the environmental, health and safety principles of the American Forest &
Paper Association. Each expansion project has been planned to comply with
applicable environmental regulations and to enhance environmental
protection at existing facilities. The Company faces increasing capital
expenditures and operating costs to comply with expanding and more
stringent environmental regulations, although compliance with existing
environmental regulations is not expected to have a materially adverse
effect on the Company's earnings, financial position or competitive
position. See Note 13 to the consolidated financial statements on page 27
for further capital spending information relating to environmental
compliance.
The Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability
Act ("CERCLA") and similar state "superfund" laws impose liability, without
regard to fault or to the legality of the original action, on certain
classes of persons (referred to as potentially responsible parties or
"PRPs") associated with a release or threat of a release of a hazardous
substance into the environment. Financial responsibility for the clean-up
or other remediation of contaminated property or for natural resource
damages can extend to previously owned or used properties, waterways and
properties owned by third parties, as well as to properties currently owned
and used by a company even if contamination is attributable entirely to
prior owners. While joint and several liability is authorized under
CERCLA, as a practical matter the cost of clean-up or other remediation is
generally allocated among the waste generators. Except for the United
States Department of Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service ("FWS") assessment
of the Fox River discussed below, the Company is not presently named as a
PRP at any CERCLA-related sites. However, there can be no assurance that
the Company will not be named as a PRP at any other sites in the future or
that the costs associated with additional sites would not be material to
the Company's financial position or results of operation.
In June 1994, the FWS, a federal natural resources trustee, notified
Wisconsin Tissue Mills Inc.("WT"), a wholly-owned subsidiary of the
Company, that it had identified WT and four other companies located along
the lower Fox River in northeast Wisconsin as PRPs for purposes of natural
resources liability under CERCLA arising from alleged releases of
polychlorinated biphenyls ("PCBs") in the Fox River and Green Bay System.
The FWS alleges that natural resources, including endangered species, fish,
birds, tribal lands or lands held by the United States in trust for various
tribes, have been exposed to PCBs that were released from facilities
located along the Fox River. The notice invites the PRPs to participate in
the development and performance of a natural resource damage assessment
with respect to the alleged discharges. WT and the four other PRPs are
engaged in negotiations with the FWS concerning the proposed damage
assessment and restoration plans.
WT and the four other PRPs are also engaged in discussions with the
Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources ("WDNR") with respect to
resolving possible state claims concerning remediation, restoration and
natural resource damage related to the alleged discharge of PCBs into the
Fox River and Green Bay System. The PRPs have proposed a settlement to
WDNR, and are engaged with WDNR in continuing discussions of the settlement
proposal. WT's obligation under the proposed settlement would not be
material to the Company's financial position or results of operations.
Based upon presently available information, the Company believes that there
are additional parties, some of which may have substantial resources, that
may also be identified as PRPs with respect to this matter and could be
expected to participate in any settlement.
The ultimate cost to WT, if any, associated with this matter cannot be
predicted with certainty at this time, due to: the inability to determine
the outcome of pending settlement discussions or, if a settlement cannot be
reached, the Company's share of any multi-party clean-up; the unknown
magnitude of any contamination; the varying costs of alternative clean-up
methods; the evolving nature of clean-up technologies and governmental
regulations; the extent to which contribution will be available from other
parties; and the scope of potential recoveries from insurance carriers and
prior owners of WT. The Company believes that it is entitled to
indemnification from the prior owner of WT, pursuant to a stock purchase
agreement between the parties, with respect to all liabilities related to
this matter. That prior owner has reimbursed the Company for out-of-pocket
costs and attorneys' fees related to investigation of the matter. The
Company believes that such prior owner intends to, and has the financial
ability to, honor its indemnification obligation under the stock purchase
agreement.
In March 1995, the United States Environmental Protection Agency
("EPA") issued "Final Guidance" for basin-wide water quality standards
pursuant to the Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement between the U.S. and
Canada regarding the development of water quality standards for the Great
Lakes and their tributaries. Under federal law, the affected states will
be required within two years to implement specific regulations that are
consistent with the provisions of the Final Guidance. Dischargers would
then have an additional period of up to five years during which to comply
with any new, more stringent, permit limits derived under the Final
Guidance. The Final Guidance is currently the subject of administrative
and judicial challenges by the paper industry and other groups, and of
pending legislation in the U.S. Congress. WT is evaluating the potential
effects of the Final Guidance on its operations and results, which effects
cannot be predicted with certainty at this time. However, based on the
Company's initial review of the Final Guidance, the Company believes that
compliance would not have a material adverse effect on its financial
position or results of operations.
The EPA has published draft rules under the Clean Water Act and the
Clean Air Act which would impose new air and water quality standards for
pulp and paper mills (the "Cluster Rules"). The definitive Cluster Rules,
when proposed, are expected to require compliance within three years after
the date of adoption. Based on the Company's preliminary estimates, if the
Cluster Rules were adopted in substantially their present form, compliance
would require capital expenditures totaling approximately $55.0 million at
the Company's two paper mills in West Point, Va., and Menasha, Wis. The
Company has joined with the American Forest & Paper Association and most of
its members in stating that they believe that the Cluster Rules, as
proposed, are inappropriate, unjustified and do not comply with applicable
law. The eventual capital expense impact on the Company of compliance with
the definitive Cluster Rules is not presently determinable, and will depend
on a number of factors, including: the scope of the standards imposed and
time permitted for compliance; the Company's strategic decisions related to
compliance, including potential changes in product mix and markets; and
developments in compliance technology. The additional effect, if any, on
the Company's business of compliance with the definitive Cluster Rules will
depend on a number of other factors, including: the domestic and
international competitive effects of compliance; and the effect of evolving
consumer demands related to environmental issues on the Company and its
competitors.
Chesapeake operates under, and believes that it is in substantial
compliance with, the terms of various air emission and water and effluent
discharge permits and other environmental regulations.
[Download Table]
RECENT QUARTERLY RESULTS
Per Share
Net
Net Gross Income Earnings Dividends Stock Price
Quarter Sales Profit (loss) (loss) Declared High Low
(Dollar amounts in millions except per share amounts)
1993:
First $209.3 $ 32.4 $ (.8) $(.03) $ .18 $23.13 $19.00
Second 236.4 35.7 1.3 .05 .18 21.50 17.63
Third 238.3 41.0 2.6 .11 .18 20.63 17.13
Fourth 201.0 37.0 7.3 .31 .18 25.75 19.63
Totals $885.0 $146.1 $10.4 $ .44 $ .72
1994:
First $212.0 $ 35.2 $ 2.0 $ .09 $ .18 $27.25 $22.25
Second 236.9 42.9 4.9 .21 .18 26.38 22.63
Third 266.9 56.7 14.4 .60 .18 35.00 24.63
Fourth 274.7 61.1 16.3 .68 .18 35.88 28.25
Totals $990.5 $195.9 $37.6 $1.58 $ .72
1995:
First $ 291.1 $ 70.5 $20.8 $ .87 $ .18 $34.25 $28.50
Second 315.1 71.4 18.5 .77 .20 33.75 28.50
Third 330.8 82.6 29.9 1.24 .20 39.00 30.75
Fourth 296.7 67.7 24.2 1.00 .20 35.38 27.50
Totals $1,233.7 $292.2 $93.4 $3.88 $ .78
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
To the Stockholders and Board of Directors
Chesapeake Corporation:
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of
Chesapeake Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1995 and 1994,
and the related consolidated statements of income and retained earnings and
cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31,
1995. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted
auditing standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the
audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements
are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test
basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial
statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles
used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating
the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits
provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above
present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial
position of Chesapeake Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1995
and 1994, and the consolidated results of their operations and their cash
flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 1995 in
conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.
As discussed in note 2 to the consolidated financial statements,
the Company changed its method of accounting for certain inventories in
1994.
/s/ Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P.
Richmond, Virginia
January 24, 1996
[Download Table]
CHESAPEAKE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
December 31,
1995 1994
(In millions)
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents $ 5.2 $ 37.0
Accounts receivable 140.4 127.1
Inventories 112.5 89.8
Deferred income taxes 16.6 15.9
Other 6.9 5.6
Total current assets 281.6 275.4
Property, plant and equipment:
Plant sites and buildings 163.0 155.5
Machinery and equipment 1,208.3 1,052.2
Construction in progress 45.1 21.1
1,416.4 1,228.8
Less accumulated depreciation 675.5 622.7
740.9 606.1
Timber and timberlands 40.0 40.3
Net property, plant and equipment 780.9 646.4
Other assets 83.8 95.1
$1,146.3 $1,016.9
[Download Table]
December 31,
1995 1994
(In millions)
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable and accrued expenses $ 130.2 $ 120.6
Current maturities of long-term debt .9 1.0
Dividends payable 4.8 4.3
Income taxes payable 3.4 5.2
Total current liabilities 139.3 131.1
Long-term debt 393.6 364.0
Postretirement benefits other
than pensions 26.5 23.3
Deferred income taxes 118.6 105.2
Stockholders' equity:
Common stock, $1 par value;
authorized, 60 million shares;
outstanding, 23.8 million and
23.8 million shares 23.8 23.8
Additional paid-in capital 107.3 107.1
Retained earnings 337.2 262.4
468.3 393.3
$1,146.3 $1,016.9
The accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are part of the
financial statements.
[Download Table]
CHESAPEAKE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME AND RETAINED EARNINGS
For the years ended December 31,
1995 1994 1993
(In millions except per share data)
Income:
Net sales $1,233.7 $990.5 $885.0
Costs and expenses:
Cost of products sold 867.9 723.7 668.7
Depreciation and cost of timber
harvested 73.6 70.9 70.2
Selling, general and administrative
expenses 130.9 114.8 102.1
Income from operations 161.3 81.1 44.0
Other income, net 11.1 8.2 8.7
Income before interest and taxes 172.4 89.3 52.7
Interest expense (30.8) (31.1) (32.0)
Income before taxes 141.6 58.2 20.7
Income taxes 48.2 20.6 10.3
Net income $ 93.4 $ 37.6 $ 10.4
Earnings per share $ 3.88 $ 1.58 $ .44
Retained earnings:
Balance, beginning of year $262.4 $241.9 $248.3
Net income 93.4 37.6 10.4
Cash dividends declared per share,
$.78 in 1995, $.72 in 1994 and 1993 (18.6) (17.1) (16.8)
Balance, end of year $ 337.2 $262.4 $241.9
The accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are part of the
financial statements.
[Download Table]
CHESAPEAKE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
For the years ended December 31,
1995 1994 1993
(In millions)
Operating activities:
Net income $ 93.4 $ 37.6 $ 10.4
Adjustments to reconcile net income to
net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation, cost of timber harvested
and amortization of intangibles 75.8 73.3 72.4
Deferred income taxes 11.6 (.1) 2.4
Gains on sales of property,
plant and equipment (5.6) (1.4) (9.4)
(Gains)losses on sales of businesses (1.8) - 1.3
Changes in operating assets and
liabilities, net of acquisitions
and dispositions:
Accounts receivable (22.6) (34.2) .9
Inventories (29.0) (5.4) 25.5
Other assets 8.4 .3 (3.0)
Accounts payable and accrued
expenses 9.9 25.2 10.5
Income taxes payable (2.3) 2.3 1.7
Other payables 3.2 2.8 .9
Net cash provided by operating activities 141.0 100.4 113.6
Investing activities:
Purchases of property, plant and equipment (157.7) (54.3) (63.9)
Acquisitions (net of notes payable of $16.0
in 1994) (69.7) (16.7) -
Proceeds from sales of property, plant
and equipment 7.4 3.3 15.9
Proceeds from sale of business 28.9 - -
Other 6.7 5.0 ( .3)
Net cash used in investing activities (184.4) (62.7) (48.3)
Financing activities:
Proceeds from long-term debt 1.2 49.4 82.1
Payments on long-term debt (71.7) (35.4) (80.3)
Net borrowings (payments) on credit lines 100.0 (3.1) (54.3)
Proceeds from issuances of common stock 5.8 5.7 3.7
Purchases of outstanding common stock (5.6) - -
Dividends paid (18.1) (17.1) (16.8)
Other - (.9) .3
Net cash (used in) provided by
financing activities 11.6 (1.4) (65.3)
Increase (decrease) in cash and
cash equivalents (31.8) 36.3 .0
Cash and cash equivalents
at beginning of year 37.0 .7 .7
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year $ 5.2 $ 37.0 $ .7
[Download Table]
CHESAPEAKE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS, Continued
For the years ended December 31,
1995 1994 1993
(In Millions)
Supplemental cash flow information:
Interest payments $32.8 $30.5 $32.7
Income tax payments, net of refunds $36.4 $18.6 $ 3.7
The accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are part of the
financial statements.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
a. Principles of Consolidation: The consolidated financial
statements include the accounts and operations of Chesapeake
Corporation and subsidiaries (the "Company"). All significant
intercompany accounts and transactions are eliminated. Certain
prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to current
presentations.
b. Cash and Cash Equivalents: Cash and cash equivalents include
highly liquid, temporary cash investments with original
maturities of three months or less.
c. Inventories: Inventories are valued at the lower of cost or
market. The cost of substantially all applicable product and
manufacturing materials inventories is determined by the last-in,
first-out (LIFO) method. The cost of other inventories is
determined principally by the average cost method.
d. Property, Plant and Equipment: Property, plant and equipment,
except timber and timberlands, are stated at cost. Timber and
timberlands are stated at cost net of the accumulated cost of
timber harvested. The costs of major rebuilds and replacements
of plant and equipment are capitalized, and the costs of ordinary
maintenance and repairs are charged to income as incurred. When
properties are sold or retired, their costs and the related
accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts, and the
gains or losses are reflected in income.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, Continued
1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, continued
e. Depreciation: Depreciation for financial reporting purposes is
computed principally by the straight-line method, based on the
estimated useful lives of the assets. Depreciation rates vary
according to the class of equipment or buildings and average 5%
for equipment and 4% for buildings.
f. Cost of Timber Harvested: Cost of timber harvested is computed
on quantities cut from individual company-owned tracts based on
costs and estimated volumes of recoverable timber.
g. Income Taxes: The Company defers to future periods the income
tax effects resulting from temporary differences (principally
depreciation) between the financial and income tax basis of
assets and liabilities.
h. Earnings Per Share: Earnings per share are based on the weighted
average number of outstanding common shares and equivalents
(24,050,719 in 1995, 23,775,582 in 1994 and 23,431,411 in 1993).
i. Other: Goodwill, the cost in excess of estimated fair value of
identifiable assets of acquired businesses (net of $12.5 million
and $11.5 million accumulated amortization at year-end 1995 and
1994, respectively), is being amortized on a straight-line basis
over 40 years or less. The Company reviews goodwill annually for
impairment. Specifically identifiable purchased intangible assets
(net of $4.1 million and $4.4 million accumulated amortization at
year-end 1995 and 1994, respectively) are being amortized on a
straight-line basis according to estimated economic lives.
Research and development costs, not significant in amount, are
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, Continued
1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, continued
charged to operations as incurred.
j. Risks and Uncertainties: Chesapeake operates in three business
segments which offer a diversity of products over a broad
geographic base. The Company is not dependent on any single
customer, group of customers, market, geographic area or supplier
of materials, labor or services. Financial statements include,
where necessary, amounts based on the judgments and estimates of
management. These estimates include allowances for bad debts,
accruals for landfill closing costs, environmental remediation
costs, loss contingencies for litigation, self-insured medical
and workers compensation insurance and income taxes and
determinations of discount and other rate assumptions for
pensions and post-retirement benefit expenses.
[Download Table]
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, Continued
2. Inventories
Year-end inventories consist of:
1995 1994 1993
(In millions)
Finished goods $ 33.7 $ 26.6 $ 29.4
Work-in-process 33.3 21.5 19.9
Materials and supplies 45.5 41.7 30.4
Totals $112.5 $ 89.8 $ 79.7
Inventories determined by the LIFO method, included in the above,
totaled (in millions) $63.7 for 1995, $43.6 for 1994 and $15.8 for
1993, or $16.2, $12.1 and $4.5 less than the respective amounts of
such inventories stated at current costs.
Effective January 1, 1994, the Company changed the method of
valuation of raw materials, work-in-process and finished goods of its
Wisconsin Tissue Mills Inc. ("WT"), a wholly-owned subsidiary of the
Company, from the average cost method to the LIFO method and expanded
the use of the LIFO method to include all of the work-in-process and
finished goods of its Chesapeake Packaging Co. subsidiary. The
Company believes that, in periods of rapid cost increases, use of the
LIFO method will result in a better matching of current costs with
current revenues. The effects of adopting the LIFO method at WT and
expanding the use of the LIFO method at Chesapeake Packaging were to
reduce consolidated 1994 year-end inventories by $4.4 million and to
decrease net income for 1994 by $2.8 million ($.12 per share). The
cumulative effect of this change to the LIFO method on the operating
results as of the beginning of 1994 and the pro forma effects on the
operating results of prior years have not been presented, as the
effects are not readily determinable.
[Download Table]
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, Continued
3. Long-Term Debt
Long-term debt at year-end consists of:
1995 1994
(In millions)
Notes payable - banks (unsecured):
Credit lines, interest 5.91% to 6.16% $ 100.0 $ -
Term loan, interest 6.78%, due 2000 25.0 40.0
Unsecured notes:
11.75% notes - 50.0
5.25% notes, due 1997 11.2 16.0
10.375% notes, due 2000 55.0 55.0
9.875% notes, due 2003 60.0 60.0
7.20% notes, due 2005 85.0 85.0
Industrial development authority
obligations:
6.25% to 6.375% notes, due 2019 50.0 50.0
6.375% to 6.875% notes, due 1996-2003 6.0 6.1
Other debt 2.3 2.9
Totals 394.5 365.0
Less current maturities .9 1.0
$393.6 $364.0
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, Continued
3. Long-Term Debt, continued
Principal payments on long-term debt (excluding credit lines) for
the next five years are (in millions): 1996 $.9; 1997 $12.3; 1998 $.0;
1999 $3.5; and 2000 $80.9. Because of the availability of long-term
financing under the terms of the committed credit lines, the
borrowings under uncommitted credit lines have been classified as
long-term debt.
The Company maintains credit lines with several banks maturing in
the year 2000, under which it can borrow up to $160 million at
interest rates not to execeed LIBOR plus .3%. Nominal facility fees
are paid on the credit lines. Other lines of credit totaling $140
million are maintained with several banks on an uncommitted basis.
Certain loan agreements include provisions permitting the holder
of the debt to require the Company to repurchase all or a portion of
such debt outstanding upon the occurrence of specified events
involving a change of control or ownership. In addition, various loan
agreements contain provisions that restrict the disposition of certain
assets, require the Company to maintain a ratio of long-term debt to
total capital not in excess of 60% and to meet an annual cash flow
test.
Interest expense is net of capitalized interest of $.4 million
and $3.7 million for 1994 and 1993, respectively. No interest was
capitalized in 1995.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, Continued
3. Long-Term Debt, continued
The Company has estimated the fair value of long-term debt for 1995
to be $419.7 million, or 7% higher than the book value of $393.6 million.
For 1994, the Company estimated the fair market value of long-term debt
to be $358.1 million, or 2% lower than the book value of $364.0 million.
The fair value is based on the quoted market prices for similar issues or
current rates offered for debt of the same or similar maturities. The
carrying amounts of temporary cash investments, trade receivables and
trade payables approximate fair value because of the short maturity of
the instruments.
Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to
concentrations of credit risk consist principally of temporary cash
investments and trade receivables. The Company places its temporary
cash investments in high quality financial instruments and, by policy,
limits the amount of credit exposure relating to any one instrument.
Concentrations of credit risk in regard to trade receivables are
limited due to the large number of customers and their dispersion
across different industries and geographic areas. The Company has no
derivative instruments or transactions outstanding as of the end of
1995.
[Download Table]
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, Continued
4. Income Taxes
The provision for income taxes consists of:
1995 1994 1993
(In millions)
Currently payable:
Federal $32.7 $19.2 $ 7.2
State 2.8 1.5 .7
Total current 35.5 20.7 7.9
Deferred:
Federal 12.5 .7 2.2
State .2 (.8) .2
Total deferred 12.7 (.1) 2.4
Total income taxes $48.2 $20.6 $10.3
Significant components of the year-end deferred income tax
assets and liabilities are:
1995 1994
(In millions)
Postretirement medical benefits $ 10.2 $ 9.0
Alternative minimum tax credit 1.7 16.2
Other 21.9 17.9
Deferred tax assets 33.8 43.1
Accumulated depreciation (124.4) (121.3)
Pension accruals (7.0) (7.4)
Other (4.4) (3.7)
Deferred tax liabilities (135.8) (132.4)
Net deferred taxes $(102.0) $ (89.3)
Classified in balance sheet as
Current assets $ 16.6 $ 15.9
Long-term liabilities (118.6) (105.2)
Net deferred taxes $(102.0) $ (89.3)
[Download Table]
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, Continued
4. Income Taxes, continued
The differences between the Company's effective income tax rate and
the statutory federal income tax rate are:
1995 1994 1993
Federal income tax rate 35.0% 35.0% 35.0%
State income tax, net of federal
income tax benefit 1.4 .8 2.6
Effect on deferred taxes of tax
rate increase - - 11.7
Other, net (2.4) (.4) .3
Consolidated effective income
tax rate 34.0% 35.4% 49.6%
Income tax expense for 1993 includes a charge of $2.4 million, or
$.10 a share, to reflect changes in deferred taxes resulting from the
1993 Revenue Reconciliation Act.
[Download Table]
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, Continued
5. Employee Retirement Plans
The Company maintains several noncontributory defined benefit
retirement plans covering substantially all employees. Pension
benefits are based primarily on the employees' compensation and/or
years of service. Annual pension costs are actuarially determined,
and the plans are funded with sufficient assets to meet future benefit
payment and regulatory requirements. The net periodic pension cost
includes amortization of prior service costs over periods of the
greater of 15 years or the average remaining employee service period.
Assumptions used in determining the net pension credit (based
upon beginning-of-the-year assumptions) for 1995, 1994 and 1993 and
related pension obligations (based upon year-end assumptions) as of
October 1 were:
1995 1994 1993
Discount rate 7 3/4% 8 1/2% 7 1/2%
Increase in future
compensation levels 4 5 5
Long-term rate of return
on assets 9 1/4 9 1/4 9 1/2
[Download Table]
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, Continued
5. Employee Retirement Plans, continued
The following table, based on actuarial valuations as of October 1,
1995 and 1994, sets forth the plans' funded status and amounts recognized
in the Company's consolidated financial statements for 1995 and 1994:
1995 1994
(In millions)
Accumulated benefit obligation:
Vested benefits $ 93.9 $ 74.1
Nonvested benefits 9.9 8.8
Totals 103.8 82.9
Effect of projected future
salary increases 19.1 15.7
Projected benefit obligation
for service rendered to date 122.9 98.6
Plan assets at fair value,
primarily corporate equity and
debt securities 143.3 125.2
Plan assets in excess of projected
benefit obligation 20.4 26.6
Unrecognized net loss from past
experience different from that assumed
and effects of changes in assumptions 2.3 1.2
Unrecognized net asset at beginning of
plan year being amortized principally
over 17 years (10.6) (12.0)
Prepaid pension cost recognized in Other
assets $ 12.1 $ 15.8
[Download Table]
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, Continued
5. Employee Retirement Plans, continued
The components of the net pension credit for 1995, 1994 and 1993
are as follows:
1995 1994 1993
(In millions)
Service cost - benefits
earned during the period $ 3.9 $ 4.2 $ 3.5
Interest cost on
projected benefit obligation 8.2 7.0 6.1
Actual return on plan assets (22.1) (6.8) (13.3)
Net amortization and deferral 9.4 (5.4) 1.9
Net pension credit $ ( .6) $(1.0) $(1.8)
In the second quarter of 1995, Chesapeake Paper Products Company
("CPPC") implemented an enhanced retirement program for certain hourly
employees at its West Point, Va., mill which resulted in a pre-tax
charge of approximately $3.1 million related to pensions. In the second
quarter of 1994, CPPC and Chesapeake Forest Products Company implemented
an enhanced retirement program for certain salaried employees which
resulted in a pre-tax charge of approximately $3.4 million related to
pensions.
[Download Table]
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, Continued
6. Postretirement Benefits Other Than Pensions
The Company provides certain health care and life insurance
benefits to certain hourly and salaried employees who retire under the
provisions of the Company's retirement plans. The Company does not pre-fund
these benefits.
During 1995 and 1994, CPPC and Chesapeake Forest Products Company
implemented enhanced retirement programs for certain hourly and salaried
employees (see Note 5). Service cost of $1.6 million relates to the
1995 program and service cost of $1.3 million and interest cost of $.1
million relate to the 1994 program. The components of postretirement
benefits expense for 1995, 1994 and 1993 are as follows:
1995 1994 1993
(In millions)
Service cost-benefits
earned during the period $2.4 $2.2 $ .6
Interest cost on accumulated
postretirement benefit obligation 2.3 1.9 1.7
Amortization of net loss .2 .2 -
Net postretirement benefit cost $4.9 $4.3 $2.3
[Download Table]
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, Continued
6. Postretirement Benefits Other Than Pensions, continued
The following table sets forth the accumulated postretirement
benefit obligation recognized in the Company's consolidated balance
sheet as of December 31, 1995 and 1994.
1995 1994
(In millions)
Retirees $19.6 $19.1
Fully eligible active plan participants 4.0 4.0
Other active plan participants 4.8 4.5
Accumulated postretirement benefit
obligation 28.4 27.6
Unrecognized prior service cost (.1) (.1)
Unrecognized net loss (1.8) (4.2)
Accrued postretirement benefit
obligation $26.5 $23.3
The assumed health care cost trend rate used in measuring future
benefit costs was 13% in 1993, 12% in 1994 and 11% in 1995, gradually
declining to 5.75% by 2002 and remaining at that level thereafter. A
1% increase in this annual trend rate would increase the accumulated
postretirement benefit obligation at December 31, 1995 by $1.7 million
and the 1995 postretirement benefit expense by $.2 million. The
assumed discount rate used in determining the accumulated
postretirement benefit obligation was 7.75% in 1995, 8.5% in 1994 and
7.5% in 1993 and the assumed rate of increase in future compensation
levels was 4.75% in 1995 and 5% in 1994 and 1993.
During 1994, the Company adopted Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 112, "Employers' Accounting for
Postemployment Benefits." The effects of this adoption were not
material to the Company's consolidated financial statements.
[Download Table]
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, Continued
7. Capital Stock and Additional Paid-In Capital
Changes in common stock and additional paid-in capital during 1993,
1994 and 1995 were:
Common Stock
Additional
Aggregate Paid-In
Shares Par Value Capital
(Dollar amounts in millions)
Balances, January 1, 1993 23,329,532 $23.3 $98.8
Issuances of shares:
Employee stock plans 184,846 .2 3.5
Other - - .3
Balances, December 31, 1993 23,514,378 23.5 102.6
Issuances of shares:
Employee stock plans 239,328 .3 5.4
Other - - (.9)
Balances, December 31, 1994 23,753,706 23.8 107.1
Issuances of shares:
Employee stock plans 231,327 .2 4.8
Purchases of shares (192,600) (.2) (5.6)
Other - - 1.0
Balances, December 31, 1995 23,792,433 $23.8 $107.3
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, Continued
7. Capital Stock and Additional Paid-In Capital, continued
In addition to its common stock, the Company's authorized capital
includes 500,000 shares of preferred stock ($100 par), of which 100,000
shares are designated as Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock
("Series A Preferred"). None was outstanding during the three years
ended December 31, 1995.
Each outstanding share of the Company's common stock has attached
to it one preferred share purchase right, which entitles the shareholder
to buy one unit (one one-thousandth of a share) of Series A Preferred at
an exercise price of $70 a share, subject to adjustment. The rights
will become exercisable only if a person or group acquires or announces
a tender offer for 20% or more of Chesapeake's common stock. When
exercisable, Chesapeake may issue a share of common stock in exchange
for each right other than those held by such person or group. If a
person or group acquires 30% or more of the common stock, each right
will entitle the holder, other than the acquiring party, upon payment of
the exercise price, to acquire Series A Preferred or, at the option of
Chesapeake, common stock, having a value equal to twice the right's
purchase price. If Chesapeake is acquired in a merger or other business
combination or if 50% of its earnings power is sold, each right will
entitle the holder, other than the acquiring person, to purchase
securities of the surviving company having a market value equal to
twice the exercise price of the rights. The rights will expire on March
15, 1998, and may be redeemed by the Company at any time prior to the
tenth day after an announcement that a 20% position has been acquired,
unless such period has been extended by the board of directors.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, Continued
8. Stock Options
The 1993 Incentive Plan provides that the executive compensation
committee of the board of directors or its delegate may grant stock
options, stock appreciation rights ("SARs"), stock awards, performance
shares or stock units and may make incentive awards to the Company's key
employees and officers. The maximum aggregate number of shares of
common stock that may be issued under the plan is the sum of 1% of the
outstanding shares of common stock as of January 1 of each calendar year
during the term of the plan. The plan also limits the number of shares
that may be covered by the grant of options, SARs, stock awards,
performance shares and stock units in any calendar year. The annual
limitation is 1% of the outstanding shares of common stock as of January
1 of that year increased by 1) the number of shares available but not
awarded during all prior years during the term of the plan plus 2) any
forfeited or terminated grants that were not exercised. In addition, the
maximum aggregate number of shares that may be covered by performance
shares and that may be issued in any calendar year as a stock award or
in settlement of stock units is 30% of the annual share limitation. The
annual share limitation for 1995 was 281,676 shares. The options
granted may be either incentive stock options ("ISOs") or nonqualified
stock options. Options may be granted at not less than the fair market
value at the date of grant if the option is an ISO, or not less than 85%
of the fair market value if the option is a nonqualified stock option.
SARs may be granted in relation to option grants ("corresponding SARs")
or independently of option grants. Grants may provide options and SARs
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, Continued
8. Stock Options, continued
exercisable over periods of up to 10 years.
The Nonemployee Director Stock Option Plan provides for grants to
the Company's nonemployee directors of stock options for up to 93,500
shares of Chesapeake common stock. Automatic awards will be made in
lieu of projected increases in the cash retainer and meeting fees
payable to participants. Each participant may also choose to receive an
elective award in lieu of all or part of his or her regular cash
retainer of 125 shares for each $1,000 of foregone retainer. The option
price per share for automatic awards and elective awards will be the
average closing price of Chesapeake common stock for the 20 trading days
before the October 31 that immediately precedes the grant date.
For both plans, payment may be made by the participant in cash or
Chesapeake common stock. Up to 694,415 shares, plus 1% of shares
outstanding as of January 1 of each calendar year through 2002, may be
issued after December 31, 1995, upon exercise of options or SARs
granted under the two plans.
The 1987 Stock Option Plan provided for grants to the Company's
key employees and officers of stock options and corresponding SARs for
up to 1,000,000 shares of Chesapeake's authorized but unissued common
stock and up to 200,000 SARs independent of stock options. As of
December 31, 1995, there were 666,967 shares issuable related to
options granted under this plan. With the adoption of the 1993
Incentive Plan, awards under this plan were discontinued.
[Download Table]
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, Continued
8. Stock Options, continued
The following schedule summarizes stock option activity for the
three years ended December 31, 1995:
Number of Option Price
Stock Options Per Share
Outstanding, January 1, 1993 703,493 $13.89 to $ 25.23
Granted 194,100 19.15 to 20.49
Exercised 11,905 18.65 to 20.88
Cancelled 31,982 16.63 to 23.88
Outstanding, December 31, 1993 853,706 13.89 to 25.23
Granted 203,200 20.63 to 32.63
Exercised 166,189 18.65 to 23.88
Cancelled 40,209 16.63 to 22.88
Outstanding, December 31, 1994 850,508 13.89 to 32.63
Granted 214,725 28.69 to 33.54
Exercised 187,856 13.89 to 27.81
Cancelled 34,977 18.65 to 32.98
Outstanding, December 31, 1995 842,400 18.65 to 33.54
Exercisable:
December 31, 1993 504,044 13.89 to 25.23
December 31, 1994 478,381 13.89 to 32.63
December 31, 1995 453,744 18.65 to 32.63
Available for grants:
December 31, 1993 506,203
December 31, 1994 483,321
December 31, 1995 519,082
During 1995, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123, "Accounting for
Stock-Based Compensation". This standard, which will be effective for
1996, defines a "fair value" method of accounting for employee stock
option plans and similar equity instruments, but also allows for
continued use of present accounting standards for measuring
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, Continued
8. Stock Options, continued
compensation costs of these plans. Entities electing to continue to
use present accounting standards to measure costs, must make certain
pro forma disclosures as if the "fair value" based method had been
applied. The Company plans to continue to use present accounting
standards and expects the pro forma disclosures to be immaterial to
1996 earnings.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, Continued
9. Employees' Stock Plans and Other Compensation Plans
The Company has stock purchase plans for certain eligible
salaried and hourly employees. Shares of Chesapeake common stock are
purchased based upon participant and company contributions. At
December 31, 1995, 986,500 shares remain available for issuance under
these plans.
The Company also has a noncontributory Employee Stock Ownership
Plan that covers eligible salaried and hourly employees. Shares of
Chesapeake common stock are purchased at the Company's discretion. No
purchases were made in 1995, 1994 or 1993. In November 1995, the
Company filed notice of intent with the Internal Revenue Service to
terminate this plan in 1996.
The Company also sponsors, in accordance with the provisions of
Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code, pre-tax savings programs
for eligible salaried and hourly employees. Certain participants'
contributions are matched up to designated contribution levels by the
Company. Contributions are invested in several investment options,
which may include Chesapeake common stock, as selected by the
participating employee. At December 31, 1995, 500,000 shares of
Chesapeake common stock are reserved for issuance under these
programs.
The 1993 Incentive Plan (see Note 8) provides that the executive
compensation committee of the board of directors may select certain
officers to receive annual incentive awards in the form of cash, common
stock or a combination, based upon the Company's overall financial
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, Continued
9. Employees' Stock Plans and Other Compensation Plans, continued
performance and the officer's individual performance.
The 1993 Incentive Plan provides that the executive compensation
committee of the board of directors may grant performance share awards
to key employees and officers. During 1994, performance share awards
with respect to 62,600 shares of common stock were granted, of which
9,605 shares of restricted stock and 5,402 restricted stock units were
earned for 1994 performance and an estimated 22,035 shares of
restricted stock and 12,395 restricted stock units were earned for
1995 performance.
With the adoption in 1993 of the 1993 Incentive Plan, awards
under the Officers' Incentive Program and the Long-Term Incentive Plan
were discontinued. As of December 31, 1995, 6,364 shares of
restricted stock and 3,077 restricted stock units had been earned
under the Long-Term Incentive Plan. There are no outstanding grants
under this plan. The Company has other incentive compensation plans in
effect for key employees under which awards are based principally on
operating results.
The charges to income for these plans approximated $10.8 million
in 1995, $8.3 million in 1994 and $4.9 million in 1993.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, Continued
10. Litigation
WT has received a notice from the United States Fish and Wildlife
Service that WT has been identified as a potentially responsible party
with respect to possible natural resource damages in the Fox River and
Green Bay System. See Financial Review 1993-1995, Environmental for
further information regarding this notice.
The Company is a party to various other legal actions which are
ordinary and incidental to its business.
While the outcome of legal actions cannot be predicted with
certainty, the Company believes the outcome of any of these
proceedings, or all of them combined, will not have a materially
adverse effect on its consolidated financial position or results of
operations.
[Download Table]
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, Continued
11. Supplemental Income Statement Information
1995 1994 1993
(In millions)
Other income, net:
Interest earned $ .7 $ .6 $ .2
Gains on sales of property
and equipment 5.6 1.4 9.4
Gains (losses) from sales of
businesses 1.8 - (1.3)
Miscellaneous income 7.8 10.0 5.4
Miscellaneous deductions (4.8) (3.8) (5.0)
Totals $11.1 $ 8.2 $ 8.7
[Download Table]
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, Continued
12. Supplemental Balance Sheet Information
1995 1994
(In millions)
a. Accounts receivable, net:
Trade $128.4 $128.1
Other 15.2 2.8
Allowance for doubtful accounts (3.2) (3.8)
Totals $140.4 $127.1
b. Other assets:
Goodwill, net $41.5 $43.6
Purchased intangible assets, net 1.4 1.8
Other 40.9 49.7
Totals $ 83.8 $95.1
c. Accounts payable and accrued expenses:
Accounts payable:
Trade creditors $38.4 $44.6
Bank checks in transit 20.5 17.1
58.9 61.7
Accrued expenses:
Interest 6.7 9.2
Compensation and employee benefits 36.0 31.0
Other 28.6 18.7
71.3 58.9
Totals $130.2 $120.6
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, Continued
13. Commitments and Other Matters
At December 31, 1995, commitments, primarily for capital
expenditures, approximated $101.0 million of the Company's 1996
capital spending estimate of $200.0 million. These commitments
include anticipated expenditures of $11.0 million in 1996 related to
environmental protection in connection with planned expansions and
upgrades mainly at the Company's facilities in West Point, Va., and
Menasha, Wisc. The remaining commitments of $90.0 million are for
various capital projects, none of which is individually material.
Additional nondeterminable environmental protection expenditures could
be required in the future when facilities are expanded or if more
stringent standards become applicable.
The Company leases certain assets (principally transportation and
information processing equipment and office space) generally for three
to five-year terms. The present value of any unrecorded capital
leases and the impact on net income if these leases were recorded are
not material. Rental expense for operating leases totaled (in
millions) $13.8 for 1995, $12.7 for 1994 and $13.1 for 1993. As of
December 31, 1995, aggregate minimum rental payments in future years
on noncancelable leases approximated $29.6 million. The amounts
applying to future years are (in millions): 1996 $6.7; 1997 $5.3;
1998 $4.1; 1999 $3.6; 2000 $3.6 and thereafter $6.3.
In December 1995, CPPC announced its planned participation in a
comprehensive energy partnership with Virginia Power. Through the
partnership, Virginia Power plans to build a steam and electricity
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, Continued
13. Commitments and Other Matters, continued
generating facility at CPPC's mill in West Point, Va., and become the
primary supplier of all forms of energy to the mill. This facility is
scheduled for completion in late 1997 and is subject to regulatory
approval by the Virginia State Corporation Commission and the signing
of definitive agreements with Virginia Power and outside financing
entities.
In May 1995, WT acquired the assets of Orchids Paper Products
Company in Flagstaff, Ariz., consisting primarily of a mill that
produces approximately 35,000 tons per year of recycled tissue. WT is
currently building a tissue converting plant in nearby Bellemont,
Ariz., to support the Flagstaff operations. In November 1995, WT
purchased the Chicago, Ill., mill of Chicago Tissue Company, L.P.
This mill has the capacity to produce in excess of 55,000 tons of
tissue annually. The Company expects that these tons will be
converted to tissue products at WT's Menasha, Wisc. site and a planned
facility in Greenwich, N.Y.
In July 1995, The Company announced that it would not build a
tissue mill on its 1,200 acre site in Alabama purchased in 1991. In
December 1995, The Company sold its consumer tissue business,
Chesapeake Consumer Products Company, to The Fonda Group, Inc. This
business had sales of approximately $48.0 million in 1995, $46.0
million in 1994 and $41.0 million in 1993.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, Continued
13. Commitments and Other Matters, continued
In January 1996, Color-Box, Inc., Chesapeake's graphic packaging
business, announced it would locate its newest graphic packaging plant
in Pelahatchie, Miss. Start-up is expected in mid-1996. This
facility, combined with Color-Box's three other facilities, will give
Chesapeake a national presence in the graphic packaging industry.
Also in January 1996, Chesapeake Display and Packaging Company, a
wholly-owned subsidiary of Chesapeake Packaging Co., announced that it
had signed a letter of intent to purchase the Display Division of
Dyment Limited. Dyment's Display Division, which has operations in
Erlanger, Ky., and Toronto, Canada, has annual sales of approximately
US $35.0 million. Lastly, in January 1996, Chesapeake Display and
Packaging Company announced that Memphis, Tenn., will be the site of a
new custom packing facility scheduled to be operational in March 1996.
In January 1994, Chesapeake Packaging Co., a wholly-owned
subsidiary of the Company, acquired Lawless Holding Corporation, which
reported annual sales of approximately $60.0 million in 1993 and
includes a corrugated container plant in North Tonawanda, N.Y.;
corrugated sheet plants located in Scotia, N.Y., Le Roy, N.Y. and
Madison, Ohio; and a graphic packaging plant located in Buffalo, N.Y.
Early in the fourth quarter of 1993, the Company conveyed under
lease and purchase agreements to Universal Forest Products, Inc.,
substantially all of the assets of the former Chesapeake Wood Treating Co.
Net sales of this business were $85.8 million in 1993. This conveyance
concluded Chesapeake's involvement in the wood treating business. During
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, Continued
13. Commitments and Other Matters, continued
the second quarter of 1994 the Company recorded additional post-closing
obligations related to its former wood treating operations.
Also, in the fourth quarter of 1993, the Company announced the
consolidation of the Company's West Des Moines, Iowa, packaging plant
into its Sandusky, Ohio, facility. Lastly, during the fourth quarter
of 1993, the Company sold approximately 19,000 acres of timberland
holdings which were no longer of strategic importance. These three
events netted to a $5.4 million pre-tax gain during the fourth quarter
of 1993.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, Continued
14. Business Segment Information
The Company's three business segments are packaging, tissue and
kraft products. Packaging consists of point-of-sale displays, graphic
packaging and corrugated shipping containers. Tissue is comprised of
commercial and industrial tissue products. The kraft products segment
includes kraft, forest and building products. General corporate
expenses, gains (losses) from the sales of businesses and land
development are shown as corporate.
Sales between segments reflect transfer prices at market value.
Intersegment sales not included below were $48.4 million in 1995,
$28.0 million in 1994 and $18.5 million in 1993. Segment operating
income is revenue less allocable operating expenses. Operating
expenses include all expenses except interest, income taxes and the
cumulative effect of accounting changes.
Segment identifiable assets are those which are directly used in
segment operations. Timber and timberlands are included in the kraft
products segment. Corporate assets are cash, certain nontrade
receivables, real estate held for sale and other assets.
Export sales, principally to Europe, Canada and Asia, were (in
millions): 1995 $138.0; 1994 $94.9; and 1993 $62.9.
[Download Table]
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, Continued
14. Business Segment Information, continued
Financial information by business segments:
1995 1994 1993
(In millions)
Net sales:
Packaging $ 452.6 $349.8 $252.7
Tissue 372.7 304.1 283.5
Kraft products 401.0 330.8 343.5
Corporate 7.4 5.8 5.3
Consolidated net sales $1,233.7 $990.5 $885.0
Operating income:
Packaging $ 36.9 $ 24.7 $ 17.6
Tissue 48.1 40.7 31.1
Kraft products 100.4 36.1 12.5
185.4 101.5 61.2
Corporate (13.0) (12.2) (8.5)
Income before interest and
taxes 172.4 89.3 52.7
Interest expense (30.8) (31.1) (32.0)
Income before taxes $ 141.6 $ 58.2 $ 20.7
Identifiable assets:
Packaging $ 231.3 $ 190.3 $118.4
Tissue 411.7 324.1 335.1
Kraft products 461.9 434.7 433.5
Corporate 41.4 67.8 32.3
Consolidated assets $1,146.3 $1,016.9 $919.3
Capital expenditures and acquistions:
Packaging $ 43.5 $ 53.5 $ 12.4
Tissue 107.4 9.9 9.5
Kraft products 76.2 23.5 41.9
Corporate .3 .1 .1
Totals $ 227.4 $ 87.0 $ 63.9
Depreciation and cost of timber
harvested:
Packaging $ 13.1 $ 11.0 $ 9.2
Tissue 23.9 23.6 24.3
Kraft products 36.3 36.0 36.3
Corporate .3 .3 .4
Totals $ 73.6 $ 70.9 $ 70.2
[Download Table]
ELEVEN-YEAR COMPARATIVE RECORD
(Dollar amounts in millions except per share data)
1995 1994 1993 1992 1991
Operating Results
Net sales $1,233.7 $990.5 $885.0 $888.4 $840.5
Net cost except depreciation
and cost of timber harvested 1,018.5 861.4 794.1 799.4 752.3
Depreciation and cost of
timber harvested 73.6 70.9 70.2 66.5 62.1
Income before taxes and
cumulative effect of
accounting changes 141.6 58.2 20.7 22.5 26.1
Income taxes 48.2 20.6 10.3 8.1 10.7
Income before cumulative
effect of accounting changes 93.4 37.6 10.4 14.4 15.4
Cumulataive effect of
accounting changes - - - 9.7 -
Net income 93.4 37.6 10.4 4.7 15.4
Cash dividends declared
on common stock 18.6 17.1 16.8 16.7 14.8
Income retained for use
in the business 74.8 20.5 (6.4) (12.0) .6
Net cash provided by
operating activities 141.0 100.4 113.6 69.2 67.8
Percent of income before cumulative
effect of accounting changes
To net sales 7.6% 3.8% 1.2% 1.6% 1.8%
To stockholders' equity 23.7 10.2 2.8 4.5 4.9
To total assets 9.2 4.1 1.1 1.6 1.8
Common Stock
Number of stockholders of record 7,456 7,804 7,778 7,964 7,741
Shares outstanding (in thousands) 23,792 23,754 23,514 23,330 20,635
Per share
Earnings before cumulative effect
of accounting changes $ 3.88 $ 1.58 $ .44 $ .63 $ .75
Earnings 3.88 1.58 .44 .17 $ .75
Dividends declared .78 .72 .72 .72 .72
Stockholders' equity 19.68 16.56 15.65 15.88 15.43
[Download Table]
ELEVEN-YEAR COMPARATIVE RECORD
(Dollar amounts in millions except per share data)
1995 1994 1993 1992 1991
Financial Position
Working capital $142.3 $144.3 $ 87.1 $122.2 $101.7
Property, plant and
equipment, net 780.9 646.4 653.8 668.3 641.6
Total assets 1,146.3 1,016.9 919.3 958.9 915.5
Total capital 980.5 862.5 799.7 849.6 820.8
Long-term debt 393.6 364.0 333.1 382.8 415.9
Deferred income taxes 118.6 105.2 98.6 96.4 86.5
Stockholders' equity 468.3 393.3 368.0 370.4 318.4
Percent of long-term debt
To total capital 40.1% 42.2% 41.7% 45.1% 50.7%
To stockholders' equity 84.0 92.6 90.5 103.3 130.6
Additional Data
Capital expenditures and
acquisitions $227.4 $87.0 $63.9 $85.0 $92.2
Acres of timberland owned
(in thousands) 325 328 329 350 350
Number of employees 5,305 5,209 4,833 5,062 5,039
NOTES TO ELEVEN-YEAR COMPARATIVE RECORD
Accounting policies are stated in Note 1 of Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements. This summary retroactively reflects common stock
splits of two-for-one in 1987 and three-for-two in 1986. Percent of income
before cumulative effect of accounting changes information is calculated
using beginning of year and acquisition amounts where appropriate.
1. Includes an after-tax charge of $2.8 million, or $.12 per share,
related to a change to the LIFO method of accounting for certain
inventories.
2. Includes net one-time, after tax charge of $9.7 million, or $.46
per share, related to the adoption of SFAS 106 and SFAS 109 in
1992.
4. Excludes 16,000 - 25,000 acres held by land development
subsidiaries during 1988 - 1995.
OPERATING MANAGERS AND LOCATIONS*
CHESAPEAKE PAPER PRODUCTS COMPANY
Thomas Blackburn
West Point, Virginia
Recycling Centers
Greensboro, North Carolina
Norfolk, Virginia
CHESAPEAKE FOREST PRODUCTS COMPANY
Thomas Blackburn
West Point, Virginia
Elizabeth City, North Carolina
Keysville, Virginia
Pocomoke City, Maryland
Chesapeake Building Products Company
Jack C. King
West Point, Virginia
Keysville, Virginia
Milford, Virginia
Princess Anne, Maryland
WISCONSIN TISSUE MILLS INC.
William A. Raaths
Menasha, Wisconsin
Bellemont, Arizona
Chicago, Illinois
Flagstaff, Arizona
Neenah, Wisconsin
LAND DEVELOPMENT
Joel K. Mostrom
Delmarva Properties, Inc.
West Point, Virginia
Stonehouse Inc.
Williamsburg, Virginia**
OPERATING MANAGERS AND LOCATIONS*, (Continued)
CHESAPEAKE PACKAGING CO.
Samuel J. Taylor
Chesapeake Display and Packaging Company
George F. Barnes
Bruce M. Pinover
Winston-Salem, North Carolina
Bruce A. Watson
Sandusky, Ohio**
Permanent Display Division
William D. Legard
Rural Hall, North Carolina**
Custom Packaging Divisions
Phylis R. Trivette
Rural Hall, North Carolina**
Marion, Iowa
Pennsauken, New Jersey**
Color-Box, Inc.
Jack L. Creech
Richmond, Indiana
Buffalo, New York
Visalia, California
OPERATING MANAGERS AND LOCATIONS*, (Continued
Chesapeake Packaging Divisions
Robert F. Schick
Edward P. Godsey
Baltimore, Maryland
Edward R. Badyna
Binghamton, New York
Scranton, Pennsylvania
John A. Goodloe
Roanoke, Virginia
Wesley N. Herman
North Tonawanda, New York
Le Roy, New York
Madison, Ohio
Scotia, New York
Terry R. Jenkins
Louisville, Kentucky
St. Anthony, Indiana
Anthony S. Brozna
Richmond, Virginia
Corporate Headquarters
1021 E. Cary Street, Box 2350
Richmond, Virginia 23218-2350**
804/697-1000
* As of December 31, 1995
** Leased real property
Dates Referenced Herein and Documents Incorporated by Reference
| Referenced-On Page |
|---|
| This ‘10-K’ Filing | | Date | | First | | Last | | | Other Filings |
|---|
| |  |
| | 3/15/98 | | 3 |
| Filed on: | | 3/15/96 |
| | 1/24/96 | | 2 |
| For Period End: | | 12/31/95 | | 1 | | 3 |
| | 12/29/95 | | 2 |
| | 10/1/95 | | 2 |
| | 12/31/94 | | 2 | | | | | 10-K |
| | 10/1/94 | | 2 |
| | 1/1/94 | | 2 |
| List all Filings |
↑Top
Filing Submission 0000019731-96-000001 – Alternative Formats (Word / Rich Text, HTML, Plain Text, et al.)
Copyright © 2024 Fran Finnegan & Company LLC – All Rights Reserved.
About — Privacy — Redactions — Help —
Sun., May 5, 8:54:54.1pm ET 