SEC Info℠ | Home | Search | My Interests | Help | Sign In | Please Sign In | ||||||||||||||||||||
¶
– Release Delayed to: 11/28/05 ·As Of Filer Filing For·On·As Docs:Size Issuer Agent 11/23/04 Dover Downs Gaming & Enterta… Inc SC TO-I/A¶ 2:96K Dover Downs Gaming & Enterta… Inc Merrill Corp/New/FA |
Document/Exhibit Description Pages Size 1: SC TO-I/A Amendment to Tender-Offer Statement - Issuer HTML 45K Tender Offer 2: CORRESP ¶ Comment-Response or Other Letter to the SEC HTML 52K
writer's direct dial: | (302) 475-6756 | ||
telecopy: | (302) 475-3555 | ||
email: | kbelohoubek@doverdowns.com |
Via EDGAR
CORRESP
and Regular Mail
Abby Adams
Special Counsel
Office of Mergers and Acquisitions
United States Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Division of Corporation Finance
Washington, D.C. 20549
Dear Ms. Adams:
Thank you for your comment letter dated November 15, 2004. In response to your letter, we have prepared Amendment Number 1 to the Schedule TO and are filing it contemporaneously herewith.
Our response to your comment letter follows. For ease of reference, we first reproduce the entire comment in italicized text and then provide our response.
Offer to Purchase
Table of Contents, page i
We have revised the first paragraph after the Table of Contents to clarify our duty under Rules 13e-4(c)(3) and 13e-4(e)(3) by the addition of the following sentence at the end of the paragraph: "However, if a material change occurs in the information published, sent or given to stockholders, we will disseminate promptly disclosure of the change in a manner reasonably calculated to inform stockholders of the change and will file with the Securities and Exchange Commission an Amendment to the Tender Offer Statement on Schedule TO of which this Offer to Purchase is a part."
Where You Can Find More Information, page ii
Instruction 2 to Item 10 (Financial Statements) of Schedule TO states that Financial Statements are not considered material when the consideration for a Tender Offer consists solely of cash, the Offer is not subject to any financing condition and the offeror is a public
reporting company. Accordingly, while we have voluntarily provided summary financial information beyond that which is required by the rules, it is not necessary for us to comply with any disclosure obligations under 1010(a), (b) or (c) of Regulation M-A.
Conditions of the Offer, page 10
We did not include any disclosure regarding regulatory approvals required for the Offer to be completed as we were not aware of any. The language was included to allow us the flexibility in the event a regulatory agency chose to assert some form of jurisdiction over the Offer. We view this as highly unlikely and have eliminated this condition both from the Summary Term Sheet and the Conditions section.
We had not intended by the phrase "contemplated future conduct" to refer to any particular new business ventures or contemplated changes in our business. Accordingly, in the second and fourth bullet points, we have deleted the reference to the "future conduct" of our business. A similar revision has been made to the first bullet point. The revised text is reproduced below in our response to Item 6.
Our intent with respect to the fourth bullet item was to address situations where there has been an event that "might materially adversely effect" the extension of credit. We have revised our disclosure in the fourth bullet item in both clauses (iv) and (vii) to clarify that intent. The revised clauses read as follows:
2
We have included a standard of reasonableness in order to provide objective criteria as to when an offer condition has been satisfied. Each of the conditions that does not otherwise have an objective determinant will require that a determination be made "in our reasonable judgement." The following revisions have been made:
Summary Term Sheet, page (vi).
Under the heading "Are there any material conditions upon the Company's obligation to complete the Offer?":
Section 7, Conditions of the Offer, page 10.
"there shall have been threatened, instituted or pending any action or proceeding by any government or governmental, regulatory or administrative agency or authority or tribunal or any other person, domestic or foreign, or before any court, authority, agency or tribunal that directly or indirectly (i) challenges our purchase or shares pursuant to the Offer or otherwise in any manner relates to or affects the Offer or (ii) in our judgment, could materially and adversely affect our business, condition (financial or other), income or operations."
"there shall have been any action threatened, pending or taken, or approval withheld, or any statute, rule, regulation, judgment, order or injunction threatened, proposed, sought, promulgated, enacted, entered, amended, enforced or deemed to be applicable to the Offer or us or any of our subsidiaries, by any legislative body, court, authority, agency or tribunal which, in our reasonable judgment, could directly or indirectly (i) make our acceptance for payment of, or payment for, some or all of the shares illegal or otherwise restrict or prohibit completion of the Offer, (ii) delay or restrict our ability, or render us unable, to accept for payment or pay for some or all of the shares, or (iii) materially and adversely affect our business, condition (financial or other), income or operations."
"there shall have occurred (i) any general suspension of trading in, or limitation on prices for, securities on any national securities exchange or in the over-the-counter market, (ii) any material decline, in our reasonable judgment, in the market price of our Common Stock, the Dow Jones Industrial Average, the Standard and Poor's Index of 500 Industrial Companies or the New York Stock Exchange or the NASDAQ Composite Index from the close of business on November 10, 2004, (iii) any change in the general political, market, economic or financial condition in the United States or abroad that could, in our reasonable judgment, have a material adverse effect on our business, condition (financial or other), income or operations, (iv) the declaration of a banking moratorium or any suspension of payments in respect of banks in the United States or any limitation on, or any event which, in our reasonable judgment, might materially adversely affect, the extension of credit by lending institutions in the United States, (v) the commencement or escalation of a war, armed hostilities or other international or national calamity directly or indirectly involving the United States or any of its territories, including but not limited to an act of terrorism, that could, in our reasonable judgment, have a material adverse affect on our business, condition (financial or otherwise), income or operations,
3
(vi) material change in United States or any other currency exchange rates or a suspension of or limitation on the markets therefor, that could, in our reasonable judgment, have a material adverse affect on our business, condition (financial or otherwise), income or operations, (vii) any material limitation (whether or not mandatory) by any governmental, regulatory or administrative agency or authority on, or any event, or any disruption or adverse change in the financial or capital markets generally or the market for loan syndications in particular, that, in our reasonable judgment, might materially adversely affect the extension of credit by banks or other lending institutions in the United States, or (viii) in the case of any of the foregoing existing at the time of the commencement of the Offer, in our reasonable judgment, a material acceleration or worsening thereof;"
"there shall have occurred any event or events that have resulted, or may in our reasonable judgment result, in an actual or threatened material and adverse change in our business, condition (financial or otherwise), income or operations;"
We have more narrowly tailored the conditions in clauses (v), (vi) and (viii) in the fourth bullet point to insure that we are concerned with circumstances that would have a material adverse affect on our business in our reasonable judgement. The revised text is reproduced above in our response to Item 6.
We confirm that the disclosure at the top of page 11, which relates to our determination whether the triggering of a condition "makes it undesirable or inadvisable" to proceed with the Offer, may not be relied upon to tacitly waive a condition of the Offer by failing to assert it.
We have revised the first table consistent with the Commission's comments in Items 10 and 11 below. Accordingly, the percentages disclosed in the second table have also been revised. As we now include with Mr. Tippie's holdings all shares of Common Stock and Class A Common Stock beneficially owned by the Estate of John W. Rollins, we have added a footnote to disclose what Mr. Tippie's percentages would be if these shares were excluded. We have chosen not to include the number of shares beneficially owned by each party listed in the second table in order to avoid duplication and confusion. The paragraph immediately preceding the second table states that the table is based upon the shareholdings set forth in the preceding table. We have amended that paragraph to include a reference to the footnotes
4
which accompany the preceding table and have added a sentence to explain that our Class A Common Stock has ten votes per share. The revised text and table read as follows:
Based upon the shareholdings for executive officers and directors set forth in the preceding table and the accompanying footnotes, the following table shows the percentage of combined voting power of such executive officers and directors in the Company represented by Common Stock and Class A Common Stock both as of November 10, 2004 and after giving effect to the Offer, assuming that we purchase all 1,040,421 shares of Common Stock and all 1,607,506 shares of Class A Common Stock and that none of our executive officers or directors tender any shares. Our Class A Common Stock has ten votes per share and our Common Stock has one vote per share.
Name of Director or Executive Officer |
Percentage of Combined Voting Power of Both Classes Before Offer |
Percentage of Combined Voting Power of Both Classes After Offer (All Shares Tendered and No Executive Officer or Director Tenders) |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Henry B. Tippie | 55.3 | % | 51.6 | % | |
R. Randall Rollins | 6.4 | % | 7.1 | % | |
Jeffrey W. Rollins | 4.9 | % | 5.4 | % | |
Melvin L. Joseph | 3.5 | % | 3.9 | % | |
Denis McGlynn | 3.0 | % | 3.3 | % | |
John W. Rollins, Jr. | 0.9 | % | 1.0 | % | |
Patrick J. Bagley | — | — | |||
Kenneth K. Chalmers | — | — | |||
Klaus M. Belohoubek | — | — | |||
Edward J. Sutor | — | — | |||
Timothy R. Horne | — | — | |||
All Directors and Officers as a Group (11 persons) | 74.1 | % | 72.4 | % |
We also made corresponding numerical changes to the text in the section which follows under the heading, "Controlled Corporation Status":
We have revised note 1 to clarify that the option numbers disclosed are those which are exercisable within sixty (60) days. We have also revised the table to include those shares in the numbers and percentages of shares beneficially owned by the respective parties as required by Rule 13d-3(d). The full text is included in the response to Item 11 below.
5
We have revised our footnote disclosures to include rather than exclude shares and have revised the table to include those shares and the numbers and percentages of shares beneficially owned. We note that there is significant textual disclosure following the tables to fully inform our stockholders as to the number of shares owned and controlled by insiders and the percentage of ownership and voting control associated with those shares. Accordingly, while we have made a slight change to the presentation of the data, we believe that all of the information was previously and fully disclosed to our stockholders.
As we discussed with the Commission, we disclose in footnote number 1 that under Rule 13d, "a stockholder is deemed to have beneficial ownership of the shares of Common Stock which the stockholder may acquire upon conversion of Class A Common Stock." We do not present the numbers and percentages on this basis because we believe it would overstate the holdings and be misleading. Footnote 1 continues with the following statement: "In order to avoid overstatement, the amount of Common Stock beneficially owned does not take into account shares of Common Stock which may be acquired upon conversion of Class A Common Stock (an amount which is equal to the number of shares of Class A Common Stock held by a stockholder)."
This presentation is consistent with the presentation which has historically been in our proxy filings. Were we to include for each person in our proxy filings percentages for Common Stock based upon full conversion of that person's Class A Common Stock, the result would be that the total shareholdings would be well in excess of 100%—a very confusing and misleading result. For example, before the Offer, Mr. Tippie's beneficial ownership of Common Stock (assuming the conversion of his Class A shares and those of the Estate) would amount to 61.3% suggesting a much larger stake in the Company than he actually has (about 36.9% of the total combined equity in the Company). In fact, not only would this presentation overstate the percentage of shares owned, but it would also understate the voting power represented by the shares owned. This is because once converted, the Class A Common Stock would no longer have ten votes per share. For this reason, we have historically presented percentages owned by class and voluntarily included additional disclosure relative to the percentage of voting power represented by the combined ownership of Common Stock and Class A Common Stock.
The full text of the revisions follows:
Under the heading "Beneficial Ownership of Directors and Executive Officers:
"As of November 10, 2004, all of our directors and executive officers as a group (11 persons) owned beneficially an aggregate of 387,505 shares of Common Stock and 12,428,054 shares of Class A Common Stock, or approximately 7.1% of the shares of Common Stock and approximately 80.4% of the shares of Class A Common Stock then outstanding. We have been advised that no director or executive officer intends to tender shares pursuant to the Offer. If we purchase all 1,040,421 shares of Common Stock and all 1,607,506 shares of Class A Common Stock pursuant to the Offer and no director or officer tenders shares, the percentage of the outstanding shares owned beneficially by all of our directors and executive officers as a group would decrease to approximately 5.8% of the shares of Common Stock and approximately 79.0% of the shares of Class A Common Stock then outstanding."
6
|
Number of Shares and Nature of Beneficial Ownership by Class(1) |
Percentage Beneficially Owned by Class Before Offer |
Percentage Beneficially Owned by Class After Offer (All Shares Tendered and No Executive Officer or Director Tenders) |
||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Name of Director or Executive Officer |
Common Stock |
Class A Common Stock |
Common Stock |
Class A Common Stock |
Common Stock |
Class A Common Stock |
|||||||
Henry B. Tippie | 330,000 | 9,439,372 | (2)(3) | 3.2 | % | 58.7 | % | 1.4 | % | 54.9 | % | ||
R. Randall Rollins | — | 1,421,000 | (3) | — | 8.8 | % | — | 9.8 | % | ||||
Jeffrey W. Rollins | 48,070 | (4) | 827,782 | 0.5 | % | 5.1 | % | 0.5 | % | 5.7 | % | ||
Melvin L. Joseph | 14,000 | 602,000 | 0.1 | % | 3.7 | % | 0.2 | % | 4.2 | % | |||
Denis McGlynn | 83,280 | 498,300 | (5) | 0.8 | % | 3.1 | % | 0.9 | % | 3.4 | % | ||
John W. Rollins, Jr. | 135,660 | (6) | 137,900 | 1.3 | % | 0.9 | % | 1.5 | % | 1.0 | % | ||
Patrick J. Bagley | 16,366 | — | 0.2 | % | — | 0.2 | % | — | |||||
Kenneth K. Chalmers | 2,400 | (7) | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||
Klaus M. Belohoubek | 41,644 | — | 0.4 | % | — | 0.4 | % | — | |||||
Edward J. Sutor | 54,909 | — | 0.5 | % | — | 0.6 | % | — | |||||
Timothy R. Horne | 31,348 | — | 0.3 | % | — | 0.3 | % | — | |||||
All Directors and Officers as a Group (11 persons) | 741,311 | 12,926,354 | 7.1 | % | 80.4 | % | 5.8 | % | 79.0 | % |
7
Closing Comments
We urge all persons who are responsible for the accuracy and adequacy of the disclosure in the filings reviewed by the staff to be certain that they have provided all information investors require. Since the company, and its management are in possession of all facts relating to a company's disclosure, they are responsible for the accuracy and adequacy of the disclosures they have made.
In connection with responding to our comments, please provide, in writing, a statement from the company acknowledging that
In addition, please be advised that the Division of Enforcement has access to all information you provide to the staff of the Division of Corporation Finance in our review of your filing or in response to our comments on your filing.
Response:
The Company acknowledges that:
8
Please contact me at (302) 475-6756 if you have any questions regarding the above or require any additional information.
Thank you.
Very truly yours, |
||
/s/ Klaus M. Belohoubek Klaus M. Belohoubek Senior Vice President-General Counsel |
KMB/lal
9
This ‘SC TO-I/A’ Filing | Date | Other Filings | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Filed on: | 11/23/04 | |||
11/22/04 | ||||
11/15/04 | ||||
11/10/04 | SC TO-I | |||
List all Filings |