SEC Info  
    Home      Search      My Interests      Help      Sign In      Please Sign In

Calvert Variable Products, Inc., et al. – ‘485APOS’ on 2/5/13

On:  Tuesday, 2/5/13, at 9:09am ET   ·   Private-to-Public:  Document/Exhibit  –  Release Delayed   ·   Accession #:  743773-13-5   ·   File #s:  2-90309, 811-04000

Previous ‘485APOS’:  ‘485APOS’ on 3/1/10   ·   Next:  ‘485APOS’ on 4/5/13   ·   Latest:  ‘485APOS’ on 2/11/22

Find Words in Filings emoji
 
  in    Show  and   Hints

  As Of                Filer                Filing    For·On·As Docs:Size

 2/05/13  Calvert Variable Products, Inc.   485APOS¶              20:2.3M
          → CVT Volatility Managed Growth Portfolio New Fund/Series! Class F New Class/Contract!CVT Volatility Managed Moderate Growth Portfolio New Fund/Series! Class F New Class/Contract!CVT Volatility Managed Moderate Portfolio New Fund/Series! Class F New Class/Contract!

Post-Effective Amendment
Filing Table of Contents

Document/Exhibit                   Description                      Pages   Size 

 1: 485APOS     Post-Effective Amendment                            HTML   1.00M 
20: COVER     ¶ Comment-Response or Cover Letter to the SEC         HTML      8K 
 2: EX-99.B BYLAWS  Miscellaneous Exhibit                           HTML    109K 
 3: EX-99.D ADVSR CONTR  Miscellaneous Exhibit                      HTML     14K 
 4: EX-99.D ADVSR CONTR  Miscellaneous Exhibit                      HTML     12K 
 5: EX-99.D ADVSR CONTR  Miscellaneous Exhibit                      HTML     17K 
 6: EX-99.D ADVSR CONTR  Miscellaneous Exhibit                      HTML     57K 
 7: EX-99.D ADVSR CONTR  Miscellaneous Exhibit                      HTML     98K 
 8: EX-99.E UNDR CONTR  Miscellaneous Exhibit                       HTML     30K 
 9: EX-99.F BONUS PROFIT  Miscellaneous Exhibit                     HTML     41K 
10: EX-99.G CUST AGREEMT  Miscellaneous Exhibit                     HTML     10K 
11: EX-99.H OTH MAT CONT  Miscellaneous Exhibit                     HTML     34K 
12: EX-99.H OTH MAT CONT  Miscellaneous Exhibit                     HTML     14K 
13: EX-99.H OTH MAT CONT  Miscellaneous Exhibit                     HTML     17K 
14: EX-99.I LEGAL OPININ  Miscellaneous Exhibit                     HTML     10K 
15: EX-99.M 12B-1 PLAN  Miscellaneous Exhibit                       HTML     38K 
16: EX-99.N 18F-3 PLAN  Miscellaneous Exhibit                       HTML     30K 
17: EX-99.P CODE ETH  Miscellaneous Exhibit                         HTML     76K 
18: EX-99.P CODE ETH  Miscellaneous Exhibit                         HTML     44K 
19: EX-99.Q POA  Miscellaneous Exhibit                              HTML     46K 


‘485APOS’   —   Post-Effective Amendment


This is an HTML Document rendered as filed.  [ Alternative Formats ]



  cvp485afeb2013.htm - Generated by SEC Publisher for SEC Filing  

SEC Registration Nos.
Nos. 811-04000 and 002-90309 

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549 

FORM N-1A  

REGISTRATION STATEMENT UNDER THE
SECURITIES ACT OF 1933 

Post-Effective Amendment No. 75            XX

and/or

REGISTRATION STATEMENT UNDER THE
INVESTMENT ACT OF 1940 

Amendment No. 76                         XX 

Calvert Variable Products, Inc.

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Charter) 

4550 Montgomery Avenue
Bethesda, Maryland 20814
(Address of Principal Executive Offices) 

Registrant's Telephone Number: (301) 951-4800 

William M. Tartikoff
4550 Montgomery Avenue
Bethesda, Maryland 20814
(Name and Address of Agent for Service)

 


 

 

 

It is proposed that this filing will become effective (check appropriate box):

o

 

immediately upon filing pursuant to paragraph (b)

o

 

On (date) pursuant to paragraph (b)

o

 

60 days after filing pursuant to paragraph (a)(1)

o

 

on (date) pursuant to paragraph (a)(1)

o

 

75 days after filing pursuant to paragraph (a)(2)

X

 

on April 22, 2013 pursuant to paragraph (a)(2) of Rule 485.

 

 

EXPLANATORY NOTE

 

This post-effective amendment relates solely to Calvert VP Volatility Managed Moderate Portfolio, Calvert VP Volatility Managed Moderate Growth Portfolio, and Calvert VP Volatility Managed Growth Portfolio (the "Funds"), three  new series of Calvert Variable Products, Inc. and does not otherwise delete, amend, or supersede any prospectus, statement of additional information, exhibit, undertaking, or other information contained in the Registration Statement.

 

 


 

 

Calvert Variable Products (“VP”) Portfolios

PROSPECTUS

 

 

 

April 30, 2013

 

Calvert VP Volatility Managed Moderate Portfolio

 

Calvert VP Volatility Managed Moderate Growth Portfolio

 

Calvert VP Volatility Managed Growth Portfolio

 

 

 

 

 

These securities have not been approved or disapproved by the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) or any State Securities Commission, and neither the SEC nor any State Securities Commission has determined that this Prospectus is accurate or adequate. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.

 


 

 

Calvert VP Portfolios Prospectus

April 30, 2013

 

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

                                                             

                                                                                                             

 

Page

 

PROSPECTUS SUPPLEMENTS (IF ANY)

 

(This section reflects any supplemental information about the Fund since the date of this Prospectus.)

 

 

PORTFOLIO SUMMARIES  

 

(This section summarizes Portfolio fees, investment strategies, risks, past performance, and purchase and sale procedures.)

 

1

 

Calvert VP Volatility Managed Moderate Portfolio

 

1

 

Calvert VP Volatility Managed Moderate Growth Portfolio

 

7

 

Calvert VP Volatility Managed Growth Portfolio

 

13

 

MORE INFORMATION ON FEES AND EXPENSES  

 

(This section provides details on Portfolio fees and expenses.)

 

19

 

MORE INFORMATION ON INVESTMENT STRATEGIES AND RISKS

 

(This section provides details on Portfolio investment strategies and risks.)

 

20

 

Portfolio Holdings

 

(This section provides details on Portfolio holdings.)

 

26

 

MANAGEMENT OF PORTFOLIO INVESTMENTS  

 

(This section provides details on Portfolio investment managers.)

 

27

 

About Calvert

 

27

 

More Information about the Subadvisors and Portfolio Managers

 

27

 

Advisory Fees

 

28

 

INVESTOR INFORMATION  

 

(This section provides details on purchase and redemption of Portfolio shares, how shares are valued, and information on dividends, distributions and taxes.)

 

28

 

General Information about the Portfolios

 

28

 

Purchase, Exchange and Redemption of Shares

 

28

 

How Shares are Priced

 

29

 

Distribution and Service Fees

 

30

 

Market Timing Policy

 

30

 

Dividends and Distributions

 

31

 


 

 

PORTFOLIO SUMMARY              Calvert VP Portfolios                                                                                                                                                                                                   

CALVERT VP VOLATILITY MANAGED MODERATE PORTFOLIO

 

Class: F

INVESTMENT OBJECTIVE

The Portfolio pursues current income and modest growth potential consistent with the preservation of capital, while seeking to manage overall portfolio volatility.  This objective may be changed by the Portfolio’s Board of Directors without shareholder approval.

 

FEES AND EXPENSES OF THE PORTFOLIO

This table describes the fees and expenses that you may pay if you invest in shares of the Portfolio.

The table and the following example do not reflect fees and charges imposed under the variable annuity contracts and life insurance policies (each a “Policy”) through which an investment may be made. If those fees and charges were included, costs would be higher.  Please consult the prospectus for your Policy for information regarding those fees and charges.

Shareholder Fees (fees paid directly from your investment)

Maximum sales charge (load) on purchases

None

Maximum deferred sales charge (load)

None

Annual Fund Operating Expenses (expenses that you pay each year as a % of the value of your investment)  

Management fees

0.52%

Distribution and service (12b-1) fees

0.25%

Other expenses1

0.80%

Acquired fund fees and expenses1

0.14%

Total annual fund operating expenses

1.71%

Less fee waiver and/or expense reimbursement 2

(0.74%)

Net expenses

0.97%

 

1 Based on estimated amounts for the current fiscal year.

2 The investment advisor has agreed to contractually limit direct ordinary annual fund operating expenses to 0.83% through April 30, 2014. This expense limitation does not limit the acquired fund fees and expenses paid indirectly by a shareholder.  Only the Board of Directors of the Portfolio may terminate the Portfolio’s expense cap before the contractual period expires.

Example

This example is intended to help you compare the cost of investing in the Portfolio with the cost of investing in other mutual funds. The example assumes that:

·         you invest $10,000 in the Portfolio for the time periods indicated;

·         your investment has a 5% return each year;

·         the Portfolio’s operating expenses remain the same; and

·         any Calvert expense limitation is in effect for the period indicated in the fee table above.

Although your actual costs may be higher or lower, under these assumptions your costs would be:

                                         1 Year                                     3 Years

                                           $99                                          $469


Portfolio Turnover

The Portfolio pays transaction costs, such as commissions, when it buys and sells securities (“turns over” its portfolio).  A higher portfolio turnover rate may indicate higher transaction costs.  These costs, which are not reflected in annual fund operating expenses or in the “Example”, affect the Portfolio’s performance.  Because the Portfolio has less than a full fiscal year of investment operations, no portfolio turnover rate is provided for the Portfolio at this time.

INVESTMENTS, RISKS AND PERFORMANCE

Principal Investment Strategies

The Portfolio is a fund-of-funds that invests, under normal market conditions, at least 80% of its net assets in exchange-traded funds ("ETFs") and various derivatives, such as futures contracts and options.  An ETF is a type of investment company whose investment objective typically is to match the returns of a particular market index, and which generally invests in a broad sample of the securities comprising the particular index.  ETFs are traded on a securities exchange at prices quoted by the exchange throughout its trading day.  The Portfolio seeks to achieve its objectives by investing in ETFs representing a broad range of asset classes and employing derivatives to manage overall portfolio volatility.  Ameritas Investment Partners, Inc. (“AIP”), one of the Portfolio’s subadvisors, is responsible for selecting the ETFs in which the Portfolio invests.  Milliman Financial Risk Management LLC (“Milliman”), the Portfolio’s other subadvisor, is responsible for executing the Portfolio’s volatility management strategy described below.

1


 

 

The Portfolio intends to invest in ETFs, and other instruments, that provide exposure to a variety of indices, including but not limited to those shown below, and will vary its exposure based on market conditions:

Fixed Income Indices and Related Components

·     Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Index

·     Barclays U.S. Aggregate Float Adjusted Index

·     Barclays U.S. Treasury Inflation Protected Securities (TIPS) Index

·     Barclays High Yield Very Liquid Index

U.S. Equity Indices and Related Components

·     NASDAQ 100 Index

·     Standard & Poor’s (“S&P”) 500 Index

·     S&P 500 Growth Index

·     S&P 500 Value Index

·     S&P MidCap 400 Index

·     S&P MidCap 400 Growth Index

·     S&P MidCap 400 Value Index

·     Russell 2000 Index

International Equity Indices and Related Components

·     MSCI All Country World ex USA Index

·     MSCI EAFE Index

·     FTSE Emerging Index

Sector Indices and Related Components

·     MSCI U.S. REIT Index

·     S&P North American Natural Resources Sector Index

AIP considers the risk and return characteristics of the various asset classes represented by the indices, and the correlation of those characteristics between the various asset classes, in determining a range of possible allocations for each asset class given prevailing market conditions. AIP then reviews the historical returns and the current holdings of the ETFs, and uses that information to select ETF weightings that are consistent with the overall portfolio volatility target. The weighting of the Portfolio’s ETF investments representing U.S. and international equity indices, fixed income indices and sector indices will typically range above and below the targeted asset allocation for each such asset class as shown below.

ETFs that track:

Targeted

Asset Allocation (% of net assets)

Typical Asset Allocation Range (% of net assets)

U.S. & International Equity Indices

(“Equity ETFs”)

34%

24-44%

Fixed Income Indices (“Fixed Income ETFs”)

55%

45-65%

Sector Indices

(“Sector ETFs”)

11%

1-21%

AIP may reallocate net assets among the various ETFs as market conditions warrant and may allocate portions of the Portfolio to ETFs that track equity, fixed income and sector indices other than those listed above.

The ETFs represent a variety of asset categories and investment styles. The Equity ETFs are based on indices comprised of the common stock of U.S. and non-U.S. issuers whose fundamentals appeal to growth and value-oriented investors. The Fixed Income ETFs are based on indices comprised of fixed income securities of U.S. and non-U.S. issuers, corporate, mortgage-backed and government securities, investment grade securities, and securities rated below investment grade (commonly known as “junk bonds”). The Sector ETFs are based on indices comprised of real estate investment trusts (“REITs”) and natural resource-related stocks.

In its selection of investments for the Portfolio, AIP seeks ETFs that are representative of the desired asset class and whose underlying fundamentals appear to have the potential for above-average long-term performance.  These may include ETFs that are expected to show above-average growth over the long-term as well as those that appear to AIP to be undervalued.

The Portfolio may sell or reduce its position in an ETF when, in AIP’s opinion, the macroeconomic outlook changes, valuation issues arise, the Portfolio needs to be rebalanced, or there is better opportunity elsewhere.

The Portfolio’s other subadvisor, Milliman, is responsible for executing the volatility management strategy.  Volatility is a statistical measurement of the magnitude of up and down fluctuations in the value of a financial instrument, index or portfolio over time. Changes in the level of market volatility may result in rapid and dramatic price swings. Milliman seeks to stabilize the volatility of the Portfolio around a predetermined target level and reduce the potential for portfolio losses during periods of significant and sustained market declines, while providing opportunity for growth during periods when markets are appreciating.  The Portfolio generally targets an annualized return volatility level of 8%.  While Milliman attempts to manage the Portfolio’s volatility to this target, over any particular time horizon the Portfolio may experience return volatility that is higher or lower than its target return volatility. 

2 


 

 

Milliman implements the volatility management strategy primarily by investing Portfolio assets in various derivative instruments, such as futures contracts and options, which attempt to hedge against changes in market volatility and declines in the value of the Portfolio’s investments in ETFs.  Milliman seeks to stabilize volatility in the Portfolio over time at the target level by continuously monitoring and forecasting volatility in the markets, and adjusting the Portfolio’s derivatives investments in response to specific changes in the market and the Portfolio.  Milliman may buy or sell futures contracts based on one or more market indices in an attempt to maintain the Portfolio’s volatility at the targeted level in an environment in which Milliman expects market volatility to decrease or increase, respectively. 

The Portfolio may use gains it realizes from its derivatives investments to further invest in ETFs in an effort to increase long-term returns.  The notional value of the Portfolio’s derivatives investments generally will not exceed 65% of its total assets.

The Portfolio may without limitation allocate assets into lower risk assets, such as cash or short-term fixed-income securities, and away from riskier assets such as equity and fixed-income ETFs and derivatives. The Fund also may engage in active and frequent trading of ETFs and derivatives to achieve its primary investment objective.

 

Principal Risks

Asset Allocation Risk. The Subadvisor’s selection of ETFs and the allocation of Portfolio assets to those ETFs may cause the Portfolio to underperform.

Management Risk. Individual investments of an ETF may not perform as expected, and the ETF’s portfolio management practices may not achieve the desired result.  In addition, the volatility management strategy may not achieve its desired results.

Exchange-Traded Fund (“ETF”) Risk. An ETF seeks to track the performance of an index by holding in its portfolio shares of all the companies, or a representative sample of the companies, that are components of a particular index. The risks of investment in ETFs typically reflect the risk of the types of securities in which the ETFs invest. In addition, when the Fund invests in an ETF, shareholders of the Fund bear their proportionate share of the ETF’s fees and expenses as well as their share of the Fund’s fees and expenses.

Active Trading Strategy Risk. The Fund employs an active style that seeks to position the Portfolio with ETFs and derivatives that offer the greatest price appreciation while minimizing risk. This style can result in higher turnover (exceeding 100%), and may translate to higher transaction costs.

Equity Investments. The Portfolio shares the principal risks of the equity securities held by the underlying ETFs, including the key risks below. 

Stock Market Risk. The market prices of stocks held by the underlying ETFs may fall.

Common Stock Risk. Although common stocks have a history of long-term growth in value, their prices fluctuate based on changes in a company’s financial condition, on overall market and economic conditions, and on investors’ perception of a company’s well-being.

Foreign Securities Risk. Investing in foreign securities involves additional risks relating to political, social, and economic developments abroad. Other risks result from differences between regulations that apply to U.S. and foreign issuers and markets, and the potential for foreign markets to be less liquid and more volatile than U.S. markets. Foreign securities include ADRs and GDRs. Unsponsored ADRs involve additional risks because U.S. reporting requirements do not apply and the issuing bank will recover shareholder distribution costs from movement of share prices and payment of dividends.

Emerging Markets Risk The risks of investing in emerging market securities are greater than those of investing in securities of developed foreign countries. These risks include volatile currency exchange rates, periods of high inflation, increased risk of default, greater social, economic and political uncertainty and instability, less governmental supervision and regulation of securities markets, weaker auditing and financial reporting standards, lack of liquidity in the markets, and the significantly smaller market capitalizations of emerging market issuers.

Market Capitalization Risk. Large-cap companies may be unable to respond quickly to new competitive challenges such as changes in technology, and also may not be able to attain the high growth rate of successful smaller companies, especially during extended periods of economic expansion. Prices of small-cap and mid-cap stocks can be more volatile than those of larger, more established companies. Small-cap and mid-cap companies are more likely to have more limited product lines, fewer capital resources and less depth of management than larger companies. Prices of micro-cap securities are generally even more volatile and their markets are even less liquid relative to small-cap, mid-cap and large-cap securities.

Natural Resources Risk.  Natural resources have a historically low correlation to financial assets such as stocks and bonds. Correspondingly, their prices respond differently to financial market and economic conditions, although both are driven by the basic forces of supply and demand. However, because stocks and bonds are traded publicly on a secondary market, prices can quickly reflect forecasted earnings and future cash flows. Conversely, many factors may contribute to how natural resources prices respond to market events including warehousing and delivery constraints, changes in supply and demand dynamics, and a potential lack of fungibility. Other factors affecting natural resources prices include weather, agricultural production, disease, pestilence, technological developments, changes in interest rates, and domestic and foreign political and economic events and policies, including trade, fiscal, monetary and currency exchange policies. In addition, markets for commodities are likely to be volatile and there may be sharp price fluctuations even during periods when prices overall are rising.

3 


 

 

Real Estate Investing Risk. Investing in REITs exposes investors to the risks of owning real estate directly, as well as to risks that relate specifically to the way in which REITs are organized and operated. Real estate is a cyclical business, highly sensitive to general and local economic developments and characterized by intense competition and periodic overbuilding. Real estate income and values also may be greatly affected by demographic trends, such as population shifts or changing tastes and values. Government actions, such as tax increases, zoning law changes or environmental regulations, also may have a major impact on real estate. Changing interest rates and credit quality requirements also will affect the cash flow of real estate companies and their ability to meet capital needs. REITs generally invest directly in real estate (equity REITs), in mortgages secured by interests in real estate (mortgage REITs) or in some combination of the two (hybrid REITs). Operating REITs requires specialized management skills. Individual REITs may own a limited number of properties and may concentrate in a particular region or property type. REITs also must satisfy specific Internal Revenue Code requirements in order to qualify for the tax-free pass through of income and net realized gains.

Fixed-Income Investments.  The Portfolio shares the principal risks of fixed-income securities held by the underlying ETFs, including the key risks below. 

Bond Market Risk. The market prices of bonds held by the underlying ETFs may fall.

Credit Risk. The credit quality of fixed-income securities may deteriorate, which could lead to default or bankruptcy of the issuer where the issuer becomes unable to pay its obligations when due. 

Interest Rate Risk. A change in interest rates may adversely affect the value of the securities. When interest rates rise, the value of fixed-income securities will generally fall. Longer-term securities are subject to greater interest rate risk.

Junk Bond Risk. Investments in junk bonds can involve a substantial risk of loss. Junk bonds are considered to be speculative with respect to the issuer’s ability to pay interest and principal. These securities, which are rated below investment grade, have a higher risk of issuer default, are subject to greater price volatility than investment grade securities and may be illiquid.

Mortgage-Backed and Asset-Backed Securities Risk. The value of investments in mortgage-backed and asset-backed securities is subject to interest rate risk and credit risk. These securities are also subject to the risk that borrowers will prepay the principal on their loans more quickly than expected (prepayment risk) or more slowly than expected (extension risk), which will affect the yield, average life and price of the securities. In addition, faster-than-expected prepayments may cause the Portfolio to invest the prepaid principal in lower yielding securities, and slower-than-expected prepayments may reduce the potential for the Portfolio to invest in higher yielding securities.

Mortgage-Backed Security Risk (Government-Sponsored Enterprises)Debt and mortgage-backed securities issued by government-sponsored enterprises (“GSEs”) such as the Federal National Mortgage Association (“FNMA”) and the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (“FHLMC”) are neither insured nor guaranteed by the U.S. Treasury and are not backed by the full faith and credit of the U.S. government. Such securities are only supported by the credit of the GSE. The U.S. government has provided financial support to FNMA and FHLMC, but there can be no assurance that it will support these or other GSEs in the future.

Money Market Investments. The Portfolio shares the principal risks of money market securities held by the underlying ETFs, including the key risk below.  

Money Market Risk. Yield will change in response to market interest rates; in general, as market rates go up, so will yield, and vice versa.  Credit quality of the securities may deteriorate, which could lead to default or bankruptcy of the issuer where the issuer becomes unable to pay its obligations when due.

Volatility Management. The Portfolio shares the principal risks associated with its volatility management strategy, including the key risks below.  

Derivatives Risk. In general, a derivative is a financial contract whose value is based on the value of a financial asset (such as a stock, bond, or currency), a physical asset (such as gold), or a market index (such as the S&P 500 Index). Derivative instruments are subject to a number of risks, including the risk of changes in the market price of the underlying asset, credit risk with respect to the counterparty, and liquidity risk. The Portfolio’s use of certain derivatives may also have a leveraging effect, which may increase the volatility of the Portfolio and reduce its returns.

Futures Risk. Using futures may increase the Portfolio’s volatility and may involve a small cash investment relative to the magnitude of risk assumed. If changes in a future’s value do not correspond to changes in the value of the Portfolio’s other investments, the Portfolio may not fully benefit from or could lose money on the futures position. Futures can involve risk of loss if the party who issued the future defaults on its obligation. Futures may also be less liquid and more difficult to value. 

4 


 

 

Model Risk. The volatility management models may not accurately represent risk and projected performance, in which case performance may deviate from expectations.

Basis Risk. There may be deviations between the derivatives used in the volatility management strategy and the risk factors those derivatives are meant to manage, introducing basis risk.

Gap Risk. Large discontinuous jumps in the market may cause the volatility management strategy to underperform.

Credit Risk. The hedging strategies employed in the volatility management strategy can introduce counterparty credit risk, even though efforts are made to mitigate this risk through the use of collateral and clearing mechanisms.

Leverage Risk. The volatility management strategy employs leverage to utilize capital efficiently.  While losses should in no circumstance exceed the value of the hedged position, they may be large relative to the amount of capital employed.

 

Performance

Because the Portfolio has less than one full calendar year of investment operations, no performance information is presented for the Portfolio at this time.

 

PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT

Investment Advisor.  Calvert Investment Management, Inc. (“Calvert” or the “Advisor”)

Investment Subadvisor.  Ameritas Investment Partners, Inc. (“AIP”)

Portfolio Manager Name

Title

Length of Time Managing Portfolio

Gary R. Rodmaker, CFA

Managing Director, AIP

Since April 2013

Kevin L. Keene, CFA

 

Assistant Portfolio Manager, AIP

 

Since April 2013

 

Investment Subadvisor.  Milliman Financial Risk Management LLC (“Milliman”)

Portfolio Manager Name

Title

Length of Time Managing Portfolio

Adam Schenck, CFA, FRM

 

Financial Risk Management Portfolio Manager, Milliman

 

Since April 2013

 

Blake Graves, FRM

Financial Risk Management Portfolio Manager, Milliman

Since April 2013

 

 

PURCHASE AND REDEMPTION OF SHARES

Shares of the Portfolio currently are sold only to participating insurance companies (the “Insurance Companies”) for allocation to their separate accounts to fund benefits under Policies issued by the Insurance Companies.  The Insurance Companies redeem shares of the Portfolio to make benefit and surrender payments under the terms of the Policies.

Shares in the Portfolio are offered to the Insurance Companies, without sales charge, and redemptions are processed, on any day that the New York Stock Exchange is open. The share price is based on the Portfolio’s net asset value, determined after an Insurance Company receives the premium payment or a surrender request in acceptable form.  The Portfolio does not have minimum initial or subsequent investment requirements.

A Policy owner’s interest in the shares of the Portfolio is subject to the terms of the Policy described in the prospectus for that Policy. If you are considering purchasing a Policy, you should carefully review the prospectus for that Policy.

 

TAX INFORMATION

As a regulated investment company under the Internal Revenue Code, the Portfolio is not subject to federal income tax, or to federal excise tax, to the extent that it distributes its net investment income and realized capital gains to the separate accounts of the Insurance Companies. The Portfolio intends to distribute its net investment income and realized capital gains to the extent necessary to remain qualified as a regulated investment company.

Since the only shareholders of the Portfolio are the Insurance Companies, no discussion is included here regarding the federal income tax consequences at the Policy owner level. For information concerning the federal tax consequences to you as a purchaser of a Policy, see the prospectus for your Policy.

 

5 


 

 

 

PAYMENTS TO INSURANCE COMPANIES AND THEIR AFFILIATES

The Portfolio is not sold directly to the general public but instead is offered as an underlying investment option for the Policies. The Portfolio and its related companies may make payments to a sponsoring Insurance Company (or its affiliates) for distribution and/or other services. These payments may be a factor that the Insurance Company considers in including the Portfolio as an underlying investment option in the Policy and may create a conflict of interest. The prospectus (or other offering document) for your Policy may contain additional information about these payments.

 

 

6 


 

 

PORTFOLIO SUMMARY                             Calvert VP Portfolios                                                                                                                                                   

CALVERT VP VOLATILITY MANAGED MODERATE GROWTH PORTFOLIO 

Class: F

INVESTMENT OBJECTIVE

The Portfolio pursues a balance of current income and growth potential, while seeking to manage overall portfolio volatility.   This objective may be changed by the Portfolio’s Board of Directors without shareholder approval.

FEES AND EXPENSES OF THE PORTFOLIO

This table describes the fees and expenses that you may pay if you invest in shares of the Portfolio.

The table and the following example do not reflect fees and charges imposed under the variable annuity contracts and life insurance policies (each a “Policy”) through which an investment may be made. If those fees and charges were included, costs would be higher.  Please consult the prospectus for your Policy for information regarding those fees and charges.

Shareholder Fees (fees paid directly from your investment)

Maximum sales charge (load) on purchases

None

Maximum deferred sales charge (load)

None

Annual Fund Operating Expenses (expenses that you pay each year as a % of the value of your investment)  

Management fees

0.52%

Distribution and service (12b-1) fees

0.25%

Other expenses1

0.80%

Acquired fund fees and expenses1

0.14%

Total annual fund operating expenses

1.71%

Less fee waiver and/or expense reimbursement 2

(0.74%)

Net expenses

0.97%

 

1 Based on estimated amounts for the current fiscal year.

2 The investment advisor has agreed to contractually limit direct ordinary annual fund operating expenses to 0.83% through April 30, 2014. This expense limitation does not limit the acquired fund fees and expenses paid indirectly by a shareholder.  Only the Board of Directors of the Portfolio may terminate the Portfolio’s expense cap before the contractual period expires.

Example

This example is intended to help you compare the cost of investing in the Portfolio with the cost of investing in other mutual funds. The example assumes that:

·         you invest $10,000 in the Portfolio for the time periods indicated;

·         your investment has a 5% return each year;

·         the Portfolio’s operating expenses remain the same; and

·         any Calvert expense limitation is in effect for the period indicated in the fee table above.

Although your actual costs may be higher or lower, under these assumptions your costs would be:

                                         1 Year                                     3 Years

                                           $99                                          $469


Portfolio Turnover

The Portfolio pays transaction costs, such as commissions, when it buys and sells securities (“turns over” its portfolio).  A higher portfolio turnover rate may indicate higher transaction costs.  These costs, which are not reflected in annual fund operating expenses or in the “Example”, affect the Portfolio’s performance.  Because the Portfolio has less than a full fiscal year of investment operations, no portfolio turnover rate is provided for the Portfolio at this time.

INVESTMENTS, RISKS AND PERFORMANCE

Principal Investment Strategies

The Portfolio is a fund-of-funds that invests, under normal market conditions, at least 80% of its net assets in exchange-traded funds ("ETFs") and various derivatives, such as futures contracts and options.  An ETF is a type of investment company whose investment objective typically is to match the returns of a particular market index, and which generally invests in a broad sample of the securities comprising the particular index.  ETFs are traded on a securities exchange at prices quoted by the exchange throughout its trading day.  The Portfolio seeks to achieve its objectives by investing in ETFs representing a broad range of asset classes and employing derivatives to manage overall portfolio volatility.  Ameritas Investment Partners, Inc. (“AIP”), one of the Portfolio’s subadvisors, is responsible for selecting the ETFs in which the Portfolio invests.  Milliman Financial Risk Management LLC (“Milliman”), the Portfolio’s other subadvisor, is responsible for executing the Portfolio’s volatility management strategy described below.

7 


 

 

The Portfolio intends to invest in ETFs, and other instruments, that provide exposure to a variety of indices, including but not limited to those shown below, and will vary its exposure based on market conditions:

Fixed Income Indices and Related Components

·     Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Index

·     Barclays U.S. Aggregate Float Adjusted Index

·     Barclays U.S. Treasury Inflation Protected Securities (TIPS) Index

·     Barclays High Yield Very Liquid Index

U.S. Equity Indices and Related Components

·     NASDAQ 100 Index

·     Standard & Poor’s (“S&P”) 500 Index

·     S&P 500 Growth Index

·     S&P 500 Value Index

·     S&P MidCap 400 Index

·     S&P MidCap 400 Growth Index

·     S&P MidCap 400 Value Index

·     Russell 2000 Index

International Equity Indices and Related Components

·     MSCI All Country World ex USA Index

·     MSCI EAFE Index

·     FTSE Emerging Index

Sector Indices and Related Components

·     MSCI U.S. REIT Index

·     S&P North American Natural Resources Sector Index

 

AIP considers the risk and return characteristics of the various asset classes represented by the indices, and the correlation of those characteristics between the various asset classes, in determining a range of possible allocations for each asset class given prevailing market conditions. AIP then reviews the historical returns and the current holdings of the ETFs, and uses that information to select ETF weightings that are consistent with the overall portfolio volatility target. The weighting of the Portfolio’s ETF investments representing U.S. and international equity indices, fixed income indices and sector indices will typically range above and below the targeted asset allocation for each such asset class as shown below.

ETFs that track:

Targeted

Asset Allocation (% of net assets)

Typical Asset Allocation Range (% of net assets)

U.S. & International Equity Indices

(“Equity ETFs”)

48%

38-58%

Fixed Income Indices (“Fixed Income ETFs”)

40%

30-50%

Sector Indices

(“Sector ETFs”)

12%

2-22%

AIP may reallocate net assets among the various ETFs as market conditions warrant and may allocate portions of the Portfolio to ETFs that track equity, fixed income and sector indices other than those listed above.

The ETFs represent a variety of asset categories and investment styles. The Equity ETFs are based on indices comprised of the common stock of U.S. and non-U.S. issuers whose fundamentals appeal to growth and value-oriented investors. The Fixed Income ETFs are based on indices comprised of fixed income securities of U.S. and non-U.S. issuers, corporate, mortgage-backed and government securities, investment grade securities, and securities rated below investment grade (commonly known as “junk bonds”). The Sector ETFs are based on indices comprised of real estate investment trusts (“REITs”) and natural resource-related stocks.

In its selection of investments for the Portfolio, AIP seeks ETFs that are representative of the desired asset class and whose underlying fundamentals appear to have the potential for above-average long-term performance.  These may include ETFs that are expected to show above-average growth over the long-term as well as those that appear to AIP to be undervalued.

The Portfolio may sell or reduce its position in an ETF when, in AIP’s opinion, the macroeconomic outlook changes, valuation issues arise, the Portfolio needs to be rebalanced, or there is better opportunity elsewhere.

The Portfolio’s other subadvisor, Milliman, is responsible for executing the volatility management strategy.  Volatility is a statistical measurement of the magnitude of up and down fluctuations in the value of a financial instrument, index or portfolio over time. Changes in the level of market volatility may result in rapid and dramatic price swings. Milliman seeks to stabilize the volatility of the Portfolio around a predetermined target level and reduce the potential for portfolio losses during periods of significant and sustained market declines, while providing opportunity for growth during periods when markets are appreciating.  The Portfolio generally targets an annualized return volatility level of 10%.  While Milliman attempts to manage the Portfolio’s volatility to this target, over any particular time horizon the Portfolio may experience return volatility that is higher or lower than its target return volatility. 

8 


 

 

Milliman implements the volatility management strategy primarily by investing Portfolio assets in various derivative instruments, such as futures contracts and options, which attempt to hedge against changes in market volatility and declines in the value of the Portfolio’s investments in ETFs.  Milliman seeks to stabilize volatility in the Portfolio over time at the target level by continuously monitoring and forecasting volatility in the markets, and adjusting the Portfolio’s derivatives investments in response to specific changes in the market and the Portfolio.  Milliman may buy or sell futures contracts based on one or more market indices in an attempt to maintain the Portfolio’s volatility at the targeted level in an environment in which Milliman expects market volatility to decrease or increase, respectively. 

The Portfolio may use gains it realizes from its derivatives investments to further invest in ETFs in an effort to increase long-term returns.  The notional value of the Portfolio’s derivatives investments generally will not exceed 80% of its total assets.

The Portfolio may without limitation allocate assets into lower risk assets, such as cash or short-term fixed-income securities, and away from riskier assets such as equity and fixed-income ETFs and derivatives. The Fund also may engage in active and frequent trading of ETFs and derivatives to achieve its primary investment objective.

 

Principal Risks

Asset Allocation Risk. The Subadvisor’s selection of ETFs and the allocation of Portfolio assets to those ETFs may cause the Portfolio to underperform.

Management Risk. Individual investments of an ETF may not perform as expected, and the ETF’s portfolio management practices may not achieve the desired result.  In addition, the volatility management strategy may not achieve its desired results.

Exchange-Traded Fund (“ETF”) Risk. An ETF seeks to track the performance of an index by holding in its portfolio shares of all the companies, or a representative sample of the companies, that are components of a particular index. The risks of investment in ETFs typically reflect the risk of the types of securities in which the ETFs invest. In addition, when the Fund invests in an ETF, shareholders of the Fund bear their proportionate share of the ETF’s fees and expenses as well as their share of the Fund’s fees and expenses.

Active Trading Strategy Risk. The Fund employs an active style that seeks to position the Portfolio with ETFs and derivatives that offer the greatest price appreciation while minimizing risk. This style can result in higher turnover (exceeding 100%) and may translate to higher transaction costs.

Equity Investments. The Portfolio shares the principal risks of the equity securities held by the underlying ETFs, including the key risks below. 

Stock Market Risk. The market prices of stocks held by the underlying ETFs may fall.

Common Stock Risk. Although common stocks have a history of long-term growth in value, their prices fluctuate based on changes in a company’s financial condition, on overall market and economic conditions, and on investors’ perception of a company’s well-being.

Foreign Securities Risk. Investing in foreign securities involves additional risks relating to political, social, and economic developments abroad. Other risks result from differences between regulations that apply to U.S. and foreign issuers and markets, and the potential for foreign markets to be less liquid and more volatile than U.S. markets. Foreign securities include ADRs and GDRs. Unsponsored ADRs involve additional risks because U.S. reporting requirements do not apply and the issuing bank will recover shareholder distribution costs from movement of share prices and payment of dividends.

Emerging Markets Risk The risks of investing in emerging market securities are greater than those of investing in securities of developed foreign countries. These risks include volatile currency exchange rates, periods of high inflation, increased risk of default, greater social, economic and political uncertainty and instability, less governmental supervision and regulation of securities markets, weaker auditing and financial reporting standards, lack of liquidity in the markets, and the significantly smaller market capitalizations of emerging market issuers.

Market Capitalization Risk. Large-cap companies may be unable to respond quickly to new competitive challenges such as changes in technology, and also may not be able to attain the high growth rate of successful smaller companies, especially during extended periods of economic expansion. Prices of small-cap and mid-cap stocks can be more volatile than those of larger, more established companies. Small-cap and mid-cap companies are more likely to have more limited product lines, fewer capital resources and less depth of management than larger companies. Prices of micro-cap securities are generally even more volatile and their markets are even less liquid relative to small-cap, mid-cap and large-cap securities.

Natural Resources Risk.  Natural resources have a historically low correlation to financial assets such as stocks and bonds. Correspondingly, their prices respond differently to financial market and economic conditions, although both are driven by the basic forces of supply and demand. However, because stocks and bonds are traded publicly on a secondary market, prices can quickly reflect forecasted earnings and future cash flows. Conversely, many factors may contribute to how natural resources prices respond to market events including warehousing and delivery constraints, changes in supply and demand dynamics, and a potential lack of fungibility. Other factors affecting natural resources prices include weather, agricultural production, disease, pestilence, technological developments, changes in interest rates, and domestic and foreign political and economic events and policies, including trade, fiscal, monetary and currency exchange policies. In addition, markets for commodities are likely to be volatile and there may be sharp price fluctuations even during periods when prices overall are rising.

9 


 

 

Real Estate Investing Risk. Investing in REITs exposes investors to the risks of owning real estate directly, as well as to risks that relate specifically to the way in which REITs are organized and operated. Real estate is a cyclical business, highly sensitive to general and local economic developments and characterized by intense competition and periodic overbuilding. Real estate income and values also may be greatly affected by demographic trends, such as population shifts or changing tastes and values. Government actions, such as tax increases, zoning law changes or environmental regulations, also may have a major impact on real estate. Changing interest rates and credit quality requirements also will affect the cash flow of real estate companies and their ability to meet capital needs. REITs generally invest directly in real estate (equity REITs), in mortgages secured by interests in real estate (mortgage REITs) or in some combination of the two (hybrid REITs). Operating REITs requires specialized management skills. Individual REITs may own a limited number of properties and may concentrate in a particular region or property type. REITs also must satisfy specific Internal Revenue Code requirements in order to qualify for the tax-free pass through of income and net realized gains.

Fixed-Income Investments.  The Portfolio shares the principal risks of fixed-income securities held by the underlying ETFs, including the key risks below. 

Bond Market Risk. The market prices of bonds held by the underlying ETFs may fall.

Credit Risk. The credit quality of fixed-income securities may deteriorate, which could lead to default or bankruptcy of the issuer where the issuer becomes unable to pay its obligations when due. 

Interest Rate Risk. A change in interest rates may adversely affect the value of the securities. When interest rates rise, the value of fixed-income securities will generally fall. Longer-term securities are subject to greater interest rate risk.

Junk Bond Risk. Investments in junk bonds can involve a substantial risk of loss. Junk bonds are considered to be speculative with respect to the issuer’s ability to pay interest and principal. These securities, which are rated below investment grade, have a higher risk of issuer default, are subject to greater price volatility than investment grade securities and may be illiquid.

Mortgage-Backed and Asset-Backed Securities Risk. The value of investments in mortgage-backed and asset-backed securities is subject to interest rate risk and credit risk. These securities are also subject to the risk that borrowers will prepay the principal on their loans more quickly than expected (prepayment risk) or more slowly than expected (extension risk), which will affect the yield, average life and price of the securities. In addition, faster-than-expected prepayments may cause the Portfolio to invest the prepaid principal in lower yielding securities, and slower-than-expected prepayments may reduce the potential for the Portfolio to invest in higher yielding securities.

Mortgage-Backed Security Risk (Government-Sponsored Enterprises)Debt and mortgage-backed securities issued by government-sponsored enterprises (“GSEs”) such as the Federal National Mortgage Association (“FNMA”) and the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (“FHLMC”) are neither insured nor guaranteed by the U.S. Treasury and are not backed by the full faith and credit of the U.S. government. Such securities are only supported by the credit of the GSE. The U.S. government has provided financial support to FNMA and FHLMC, but there can be no assurance that it will support these or other GSEs in the future.

Money Market Investments. The Portfolio shares the principal risks of money market securities held by the underlying ETFs, including the key risk below.  

Money Market Risk. Yield will change in response to market interest rates; in general, as market rates go up, so will yield, and vice versa.  Credit quality of the securities may deteriorate, which could lead to default or bankruptcy of the issuer where the issuer becomes unable to pay its obligations when due.

Volatility Management. The Portfolio shares the principal risks associated with its volatility management strategy, including the key risks below.  

Derivatives Risk. In general, a derivative is a financial contract whose value is based on the value of a financial asset (such as a stock, bond, or currency), a physical asset (such as gold), or a market index (such as the S&P 500 Index). Derivative instruments are subject to a number of risks, including the risk of changes in the market price of the underlying asset, credit risk with respect to the counterparty, and liquidity risk. The Portfolio’s use of certain derivatives may also have a leveraging effect, which may increase the volatility of the Portfolio and reduce its returns.

Futures Risk. Using futures may increase the Portfolio’s volatility and may involve a small cash investment relative to the magnitude of risk assumed. If changes in a future’s value do not correspond to changes in the value of the Portfolio’s other investments, the Portfolio may not fully benefit from or could lose money on the futures position. Futures can involve risk of loss if the party who issued the future defaults on its obligation. Futures may also be less liquid and more difficult to value. 

10 


 

 

Model Risk. The volatility management models may not accurately represent risk and projected performance, in which case performance may deviate from expectations.

Basis Risk. There may be deviations between the derivatives used in the volatility management strategy and the risk factors those derivatives are meant to manage, introducing basis risk.

Gap Risk. Large discontinuous jumps in the market may cause the volatility management strategy to underperform.

Credit Risk. The hedging strategies employed in the volatility management strategy can introduce counterparty credit risk, even though efforts are made to mitigate this risk through the use of collateral and clearing mechanisms.

Leverage Risk. The volatility management strategy employs leverage to utilize capital efficiently.  While losses should in no circumstance exceed the value of the hedged position, they may be large relative to the amount of capital employed.

 

Performance

Because the Portfolio has less than one full calendar year of investment operations, no performance information is presented for the Portfolio at this time.

 

PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT

Investment Advisor.  Calvert Investment Management, Inc. (“Calvert” or the “Advisor”)

Investment Subadvisor.  Ameritas Investment Partners, Inc. (“AIP”)

Portfolio Manager Name

Title

Length of Time Managing Portfolio

Gary R. Rodmaker, CFA

Managing Director, AIP

Since April 2013

Kevin L. Keene, CFA

 

Assistant Portfolio Manager, AIP

 

Since April 2013

 

Investment Subadvisor.  Milliman Financial Risk Management LLC (“Milliman”)

Portfolio Manager Name

Title

Length of Time Managing Portfolio

Adam Schenck, CFA, FRM

 

Financial Risk Management Portfolio Manager, Milliman

 

Since April 2013

 

Blake Graves, FRM

Financial Risk Management Portfolio Manager, Milliman

Since April 2013

 

PURCHASE AND REDEMPTION OF SHARES

Shares of the Portfolio currently are sold only to participating insurance companies (the “Insurance Companies”) for allocation to their separate accounts to fund benefits under Policies issued by the Insurance Companies.  The Insurance Companies redeem shares of the Portfolio to make benefit and surrender payments under the terms of the Policies.

Shares in the Portfolio are offered to the Insurance Companies, without sales charge, and redemptions are processed, on any day that the New York Stock Exchange is open. The share price is based on the Portfolio’s net asset value, determined after an Insurance Company receives the premium payment or a surrender request in acceptable form.  The Portfolio does not have minimum initial or subsequent investment requirements.

A Policy owner’s interest in the shares of the Portfolio is subject to the terms of the Policy described in the prospectus for that Policy. If you are considering purchasing a Policy, you should carefully review the prospectus for that Policy.

 

TAX INFORMATION

As a regulated investment company under the Internal Revenue Code, the Portfolio is not subject to federal income tax, or to federal excise tax, to the extent that it distributes its net investment income and realized capital gains to the separate accounts of the Insurance Companies. The Portfolio intends to distribute its net investment income and realized capital gains to the extent necessary to remain qualified as a regulated investment company.

Since the only shareholders of the Portfolio are the Insurance Companies, no discussion is included here regarding the federal income tax consequences at the Policy owner level. For information concerning the federal tax consequences to you as a purchaser of a Policy, see the prospectus for your Policy.

 

11 


 

 

 

PAYMENTS TO INSURANCE COMPANIES AND THEIR AFFILIATES

The Portfolio is not sold directly to the general public but instead is offered as an underlying investment option for the Policies. The Portfolio and its related companies may make payments to a sponsoring Insurance Company (or its affiliates) for distribution and/or other services. These payments may be a factor that the Insurance Company considers in including the Portfolio as an underlying investment option in the Policy and may create a conflict of interest. The prospectus (or other offering document) for your Policy may contain additional information about these payments.

12 


 

 

PORTFOLIO SUMMARY              Calvert VP Portfolios                                                                                                                   

CALVERT VP VOLATILITY MANAGED GROWTH PORTFOLIO 

Class: F

INVESTMENT OBJECTIVE

The Portfolio pursues growth potential and some current income, while seeking to manage overall portfolio volatility.   This objective may be changed by the Portfolio’s Board of Directors without shareholder approval.

FEES AND EXPENSES OF THE PORTFOLIO

This table describes the fees and expenses that you may pay if you invest in shares of the Portfolio.

The table and the following example do not reflect fees and charges imposed under the variable annuity contracts and life insurance policies (each a “Policy”) through which an investment may be made. If those fees and charges were included, costs would be higher.  Please consult the prospectus for your Policy for information regarding those fees and charges.

Shareholder Fees (fees paid directly from your investment)

Maximum sales charge (load) on purchases

None

Maximum deferred sales charge (load)

None

Annual Fund Operating Expenses (expenses that you pay each year as a % of the value of your investment)  

Management fees

0.52%

Distribution and service (12b-1) fees

0.25%

Other expenses1

0.35%

Acquired fund fees and expenses1

0.14%

Total annual fund operating expenses

1.26%

Less fee waiver and/or expense reimbursement 2

(0.29%)

Net expenses

0.97%

 

1 Based on estimated amounts for the current fiscal year.

2 The investment advisor has agreed to contractually limit direct ordinary annual fund operating expenses to 0.83% through April 30, 2014. This expense limitation does not limit the acquired fund fees and expenses paid indirectly by a shareholder.  Only the Board of Directors of the Portfolio may terminate the Portfolio’s expense cap before the contractual period expires.

 

Example

This example is intended to help you compare the cost of investing in the Portfolio with the cost of investing in other mutual funds. The example assumes that:

·         you invest $10,000 in the Portfolio for the time periods indicated;

·         your investment has a 5% return each year;

·         the Portfolio’s operating expenses remain the same; and

·         any Calvert expense limitation is in effect for the period indicated in the fee table above.

Although your actual costs may be higher or lower, under these assumptions your costs would be:

                                         1 Year                                     3 Years

                                           $99                                          $371


Portfolio Turnover

The Portfolio pays transaction costs, such as commissions, when it buys and sells securities (“turns over” its portfolio).  A higher portfolio turnover rate may indicate higher transaction costs.  These costs, which are not reflected in annual fund operating expenses or in the “Example”, affect the Portfolio’s performance.  Because the Portfolio has less than a full fiscal year of investment operations, no portfolio turnover rate is provided for the Portfolio at this time.

INVESTMENTS, RISKS AND PERFORMANCE

Principal Investment Strategies

The Portfolio is a fund-of-funds that invests, under normal market conditions, at least 80% of its net assets in exchange-traded funds ("ETFs") and various derivatives, such as futures contracts and options.  An ETF is a type of investment company whose investment objective typically is to match the returns of a particular market index, and which generally invests in a broad sample of the securities comprising the particular index.  ETFs are traded on a securities exchange at prices quoted by the exchange throughout its trading day.  The Portfolio seeks to achieve its objectives by investing in ETFs representing a broad range of asset classes and employing derivatives to manage overall portfolio volatility.  Ameritas Investment Partners, Inc. (“AIP”), one of the Portfolio’s subadvisors, is responsible for selecting the ETFs in which the Portfolio invests.  Milliman Financial Risk Management LLC (“Milliman”), the Portfolio’s other subadvisor, is responsible for executing the Portfolio’s volatility management strategy described below.

13 


 

 

The Portfolio intends to invest in ETFs, and other instruments, that provide exposure to a variety of indices, including but not limited to those shown below, and will vary its exposure based on market conditions:

Fixed Income Indices and Related Components

·     Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Index

·     Barclays U.S. Aggregate Float Adjusted Index

·     Barclays U.S. Treasury Inflation Protected Securities (TIPS) Index

·     Barclays High Yield Very Liquid Index

U.S. Equity Indices and Related Components

·     NASDAQ 100 Index

·     Standard & Poor’s (“S&P”) 500 Index

·     S&P 500 Growth Index

·     S&P 500 Value Index

·     S&P MidCap 400 Index

·     S&P MidCap 400 Growth Index

·     S&P MidCap 400 Value Index

·     Russell 2000 Index

International Equity Indices and Related Components

·     MSCI All Country World ex USA Index

·     MSCI EAFE Index

·     FTSE Emerging Index

Sector Indices and Related Components

·     MSCI U.S. REIT Index

·     S&P North American Natural Resources Sector Index

 

AIP considers the risk and return characteristics of the various asset classes represented by the indices, and the correlation of those characteristics between the various asset classes, in determining a range of possible allocations for each asset class given prevailing market conditions. AIP then reviews the historical returns and the current holdings of the ETFs, and uses that information to select ETF weightings that are consistent with the overall portfolio volatility target. The weighting of the Portfolio’s ETF investments representing U.S. and international equity indices, fixed income indices and sector indices will typically range above and below the targeted asset allocation for each such asset class as shown below.

ETFs that track:

Targeted

Asset Allocation (% of net assets)

Typical Asset Allocation Range (% of net assets)

U.S. & International Equity Indices

(“Equity ETFs”)

66%

56-76%

Fixed Income Indices (“Fixed Income ETFs”)

25%

15-35%

Sector Indices

(“Sector ETFs”)

9%

0-19%

AIP may reallocate net assets among the various ETFs as market conditions warrant and may allocate portions of the Portfolio to ETFs that track equity, fixed income and sector indices other than those listed above.

The ETFs represent a variety of asset categories and investment styles. The Equity ETFs are based on indices comprised of the common stock of U.S. and non-U.S. issuers whose fundamentals appeal to growth and value-oriented investors. The Fixed Income ETFs are based on indices comprised of fixed income securities of U.S. and non-U.S. issuers, corporate, mortgage-backed and government securities, investment grade securities, and securities rated below investment grade (commonly known as “junk bonds”). The Sector ETFs are based on indices comprised of real estate investment trusts (“REITs”) and natural resource-related stocks.

In its selection of investments for the Portfolio, AIP seeks ETFs that are representative of the desired asset class and whose underlying fundamentals appear to have the potential for above-average long-term performance.  These may include ETFs that are expected to show above-average growth over the long-term as well as those that appear to AIP to be undervalued.

The Portfolio may sell or reduce its position in an ETF when, in AIP’s opinion, the macroeconomic outlook changes, valuation issues arise, the Portfolio needs to be rebalanced, or there is better opportunity elsewhere.

The Portfolio’s other subadvisor, Milliman, is responsible for executing the volatility management strategy.  Volatility is a statistical measurement of the magnitude of up and down fluctuations in the value of a financial instrument, index or portfolio over time. Changes in the level of market volatility may result in rapid and dramatic price swings. Milliman seeks to stabilize the volatility of the Portfolio around a predetermined target level and reduce the potential for portfolio losses during periods of significant and sustained market declines, while providing opportunity for growth during periods when markets are appreciating.  The Portfolio generally targets an annualized return volatility level of 12%.  While Milliman attempts to manage the Portfolio’s volatility to this target, over any particular time horizon the Portfolio may experience return volatility that is higher or lower than its target return volatility. 

14 


 

 

Milliman implements the volatility management strategy primarily by investing Portfolio assets in various derivative instruments, such as futures contracts and options, which attempt to hedge against changes in market volatility and declines in the value of the Portfolio’s investments in ETFs.  Milliman seeks to stabilize volatility in the Portfolio over time at the target level by continuously monitoring and forecasting volatility in the markets, and adjusting the Portfolio’s derivatives investments in response to specific changes in the market and the Portfolio.  Milliman may buy or sell futures contracts based on one or more market indices in an attempt to maintain the Portfolio’s volatility at the targeted level in an environment in which Milliman expects market volatility to decrease or increase, respectively. 

The Portfolio may use gains it realizes from its derivatives investments to further invest in ETFs in an effort to increase long-term returns.  The notional value of the Portfolio’s derivatives investments generally will not exceed 95% of its total assets.

The Portfolio may without limitation allocate assets into lower risk assets, such as cash or short-term fixed-income securities, and away from riskier assets such as equity and fixed-income ETFs and derivatives. The Fund also may engage in active and frequent trading of ETFs and derivatives to achieve its primary investment objective.

 

Principal Risks

Asset Allocation Risk. The Subadvisor’s selection of ETFs and the allocation of Portfolio assets to those ETFs may cause the Portfolio to underperform.

Management Risk. Individual investments of an ETF may not perform as expected, and the ETF’s portfolio management practices may not achieve the desired result.  In addition, the volatility management strategy may not achieve its desired results.

Exchange-Traded Fund (“ETF”) Risk. An ETF seeks to track the performance of an index by holding in its portfolio shares of all the companies, or a representative sample of the companies, that are components of a particular index. The risks of investment in ETFs typically reflect the risk of the types of securities in which the ETFs invest. In addition, when the Fund invests in an ETF, shareholders of the Fund bear their proportionate share of the ETF’s fees and expenses as well as their share of the Fund’s fees and expenses.

Active Trading Strategy Risk. The Fund employs an active style that seeks to position the Portfolio with ETFs and derivatives that offer the greatest price appreciation while minimizing risk. This style can result in higher turnover (exceeding 100%) and may translate to higher transaction costs.

Equity Investments. The Portfolio shares the principal risks of the equity securities held by the underlying ETFs, including the key risks below. 

Stock Market Risk. The market prices of stocks held by the underlying ETFs may fall.

Common Stock Risk. Although common stocks have a history of long-term growth in value, their prices fluctuate based on changes in a company’s financial condition, on overall market and economic conditions, and on investors’ perception of a company’s well-being.

Foreign Securities Risk. Investing in foreign securities involves additional risks relating to political, social, and economic developments abroad. Other risks result from differences between regulations that apply to U.S. and foreign issuers and markets, and the potential for foreign markets to be less liquid and more volatile than U.S. markets. Foreign securities include ADRs and GDRs. Unsponsored ADRs involve additional risks because U.S. reporting requirements do not apply and the issuing bank will recover shareholder distribution costs from movement of share prices and payment of dividends.

Emerging Markets Risk The risks of investing in emerging market securities are greater than those of investing in securities of developed foreign countries. These risks include volatile currency exchange rates, periods of high inflation, increased risk of default, greater social, economic and political uncertainty and instability, less governmental supervision and regulation of securities markets, weaker auditing and financial reporting standards, lack of liquidity in the markets, and the significantly smaller market capitalizations of emerging market issuers.

Market Capitalization Risk. Large-cap companies may be unable to respond quickly to new competitive challenges such as changes in technology, and also may not be able to attain the high growth rate of successful smaller companies, especially during extended periods of economic expansion. Prices of small-cap and mid-cap stocks can be more volatile than those of larger, more established companies. Small-cap and mid-cap companies are more likely to have more limited product lines, fewer capital resources and less depth of management than larger companies. Prices of micro-cap securities are generally even more volatile and their markets are even less liquid relative to small-cap, mid-cap and large-cap securities.

Natural Resources Risk.  Natural resources have a historically low correlation to financial assets such as stocks and bonds. Correspondingly, their prices respond differently to financial market and economic conditions, although both are driven by the basic forces of supply and demand. However, because stocks and bonds are traded publicly on a secondary market, prices can quickly reflect forecasted earnings and future cash flows. Conversely, many factors may contribute to how natural resources prices respond to market events including warehousing and delivery constraints, changes in supply and demand dynamics, and a potential lack of fungibility. Other factors affecting natural resources prices include weather, agricultural production, disease, pestilence, technological developments, changes in interest rates, and domestic and foreign political and economic events and policies, including trade, fiscal, monetary and currency exchange policies. In addition, markets for commodities are likely to be volatile and there may be sharp price fluctuations even during periods when prices overall are rising.

15 


 

 

Real Estate Investing Risk. Investing in REITs exposes investors to the risks of owning real estate directly, as well as to risks that relate specifically to the way in which REITs are organized and operated. Real estate is a cyclical business, highly sensitive to general and local economic developments and characterized by intense competition and periodic overbuilding. Real estate income and values also may be greatly affected by demographic trends, such as population shifts or changing tastes and values. Government actions, such as tax increases, zoning law changes or environmental regulations, also may have a major impact on real estate. Changing interest rates and credit quality requirements also will affect the cash flow of real estate companies and their ability to meet capital needs. REITs generally invest directly in real estate (equity REITs), in mortgages secured by interests in real estate (mortgage REITs) or in some combination of the two (hybrid REITs). Operating REITs requires specialized management skills. Individual REITs may own a limited number of properties and may concentrate in a particular region or property type. REITs also must satisfy specific Internal Revenue Code requirements in order to qualify for the tax-free pass through of income and net realized gains.

Fixed-Income Investments.  The Portfolio shares the principal risks of fixed-income securities held by the underlying ETFs, including the key risks below. 

Bond Market Risk. The market prices of bonds held by the underlying ETFs may fall.

Credit Risk. The credit quality of fixed-income securities may deteriorate, which could lead to default or bankruptcy of the issuer where the issuer becomes unable to pay its obligations when due. 

Interest Rate Risk. A change in interest rates may adversely affect the value of the securities. When interest rates rise, the value of fixed-income securities will generally fall. Longer-term securities are subject to greater interest rate risk.

Junk Bond Risk. Investments in junk bonds can involve a substantial risk of loss. Junk bonds are considered to be speculative with respect to the issuer’s ability to pay interest and principal. These securities, which are rated below investment grade, have a higher risk of issuer default, are subject to greater price volatility than investment grade securities and may be illiquid.

Mortgage-Backed and Asset-Backed Securities Risk. The value of investments in mortgage-backed and asset-backed securities is subject to interest rate risk and credit risk. These securities are also subject to the risk that borrowers will prepay the principal on their loans more quickly than expected (prepayment risk) or more slowly than expected (extension risk), which will affect the yield, average life and price of the securities. In addition, faster-than-expected prepayments may cause the Portfolio to invest the prepaid principal in lower yielding securities, and slower-than-expected prepayments may reduce the potential for the Portfolio to invest in higher yielding securities.

Mortgage-Backed Security Risk (Government-Sponsored Enterprises)Debt and mortgage-backed securities issued by government-sponsored enterprises (“GSEs”) such as the Federal National Mortgage Association (“FNMA”) and the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (“FHLMC”) are neither insured nor guaranteed by the U.S. Treasury and are not backed by the full faith and credit of the U.S. government. Such securities are only supported by the credit of the GSE. The U.S. government has provided financial support to FNMA and FHLMC, but there can be no assurance that it will support these or other GSEs in the future.

Money Market Investments. The Portfolio shares the principal risks of money market securities held by the underlying ETFs, including the key risk below.  

Money Market Risk. Yield will change in response to market interest rates; in general, as market rates go up, so will yield, and vice versa.  Credit quality of the securities may deteriorate, which could lead to default or bankruptcy of the issuer where the issuer becomes unable to pay its obligations when due.

Volatility Management. The Portfolio shares the principal risks associated with its volatility management strategy, including the key risks below.  

Derivatives Risk. In general, a derivative is a financial contract whose value is based on the value of a financial asset (such as a stock, bond, or currency), a physical asset (such as gold), or a market index (such as the S&P 500 Index). Derivative instruments are subject to a number of risks, including the risk of changes in the market price of the underlying asset, credit risk with respect to the counterparty, and liquidity risk. The Portfolio’s use of certain derivatives may also have a leveraging effect, which may increase the volatility of the Portfolio and reduce its returns.

16 


 

 

Futures Risk. Using futures may increase the Portfolio’s volatility and may involve a small cash investment relative to the magnitude of risk assumed. If changes in a future’s value do not correspond to changes in the value of the Portfolio’s other investments, the Portfolio may not fully benefit from or could lose money on the futures position. Futures can involve risk of loss if the party who issued the future defaults on its obligation. Futures may also be less liquid and more difficult to value. 

Model Risk. The volatility management models may not accurately represent risk and projected performance, in which case performance may deviate from expectations.

Basis Risk. There may be deviations between the derivatives used in the volatility management strategy and the risk factors those derivatives are meant to manage, introducing basis risk.

Gap Risk. Large discontinuous jumps in the market may cause the volatility management strategy to underperform.

Credit Risk. The hedging strategies employed in the volatility management strategy can introduce counterparty credit risk, even though efforts are made to mitigate this risk through the use of collateral and clearing mechanisms.

Leverage Risk. The volatility management strategy employs leverage to utilize capital efficiently.  While losses should in no circumstance exceed the value of the hedged position, they may be large relative to the amount of capital employed.

 

Performance

Because the Portfolio has less than one full calendar year of investment operations, no performance information is presented for the Portfolio at this time.

 

PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT

Investment Advisor.  Calvert Investment Management, Inc. (“Calvert” or the “Advisor”)

Investment Subadvisor.  Ameritas Investment Partners, Inc. (“AIP”)

Portfolio Manager Name

Title

Length of Time Managing Portfolio

Gary R. Rodmaker, CFA

Managing Director, AIP

Since April 2013

Kevin L. Keene, CFA

 

Assistant Portfolio Manager, AIP

 

Since April 2013

 

Investment Subadvisor.  Milliman Financial Risk Management LLC (“Milliman”)

Portfolio Manager Name

Title

Length of Time Managing Portfolio

Adam Schenck, CFA, FRM

 

Financial Risk Management Portfolio Manager, Milliman

 

Since April 2013

 

Blake Graves, FRM

Financial Risk Management Portfolio Manager, Milliman

Since April 2013

 

PURCHASE AND REDEMPTION OF SHARES

Shares of the Portfolio currently are sold only to participating insurance companies (the “Insurance Companies”) for allocation to their separate accounts to fund benefits under Policies issued by the Insurance Companies.  The Insurance Companies redeem shares of the Portfolio to make benefit and surrender payments under the terms of the Policies.

Shares in the Portfolio are offered to the Insurance Companies, without sales charge, and redemptions are processed, on any day that the New York Stock Exchange is open. The share price is based on the Portfolio’s net asset value, determined after an Insurance Company receives the premium payment or a surrender request in acceptable form.  The Portfolio does not have minimum initial or subsequent investment requirements.

A Policy owner’s interest in the shares of the Portfolio is subject to the terms of the Policy described in the prospectus for that Policy. If you are considering purchasing a Policy, you should carefully review the prospectus for that Policy.

 

TAX INFORMATION

As a regulated investment company under the Internal Revenue Code, the Portfolio is not subject to federal income tax, or to federal excise tax, to the extent that it distributes its net investment income and realized capital gains to the separate accounts of the Insurance Companies. The Portfolio intends to distribute its net investment income and realized capital gains to the extent necessary to remain qualified as a regulated investment company.

Since the only shareholders of the Portfolio are the Insurance Companies, no discussion is included here regarding the federal income tax consequences at the Policy owner level. For information concerning the federal tax consequences to you as a purchaser of a Policy, see the prospectus for your Policy.

 

17 


 

 

PAYMENTS TO INSURANCE COMPANIES AND THEIR AFFILIATES

The Portfolio is not sold directly to the general public but instead is offered as an underlying investment option for the Policies. The Portfolio and its related companies may make payments to a sponsoring Insurance Company (or its affiliates) for distribution and/or other services. These payments may be a factor that the Insurance Company considers in including the Portfolio as an underlying investment option in the Policy and may create a conflict of interest. The prospectus (or other offering document) for your Policy may contain additional information about these payments.

18 


 

 

 

MORE INFORMATION ON FEES AND EXPENSES

 

MANAGEMENT FEES 

Management fees include the advisory fee paid by the Portfolio to the Advisor and the administrative fee paid by the Portfolio to Calvert Investment Administrative Services, Inc., an affiliate of the Advisor.

With respect to the amount of each Portfolio’s advisory fee, see “Advisory Fees” in this Prospectus.  The administrative fees (as a percentage of net assets) payable for each Portfolio are as follows.

 

Portfolio

 

Administrative Fee

 

Calvert VP Volatility Managed Moderate Portfolio

Calvert VP Volatility Managed Moderate Growth Portfolio

Calvert VP Volatility Managed Growth Portfolio

 

0.10%

0.10%

0.10%

 

OTHER EXPENSES

“Other expenses” include custodial, transfer agent and subtransfer agent/recordkeeping payments, as well as various other expenses. Subtransfer agent/recordkeeping payments may be made to third parties (including affiliates of the Advisor) that provide recordkeeping and other administrative services.

 

ACQUIRED FUND FEES AND EXPENSES

Expenses of acquired funds (investments the Portfolios may make in certain other pooled investment vehicles, including ETFs) are based on amounts derived from information provided by the acquired funds. Total Annual Portfolio Operating Expenses shown in the “Fees and Expenses” table in the Portfolio Summary do not correlate to the ratio of expenses to average net assets shown in the Financial Highlights; the Financial Highlights expense ratio reflects the operating expenses of the Portfolio and does not include acquired fund fees and expenses.

 

CONTRACTUAL FEE WAIVERS AND/OR EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENTS

Calvert has agreed to contractually limit the direct net annual fund operating expenses in each Portfolio to the amounts listed in the table below through April 30, 2014.  Only the Board of Directors of the Portfolios may terminate the expense caps before the contractual period expires.

 

Portfolio

Expense Cap

Calvert VP Volatility Managed Moderate Portfolio

Calvert VP Volatility Managed Moderate Growth Portfolio

Calvert VP Volatility Managed Growth Portfolio

 

0.83%

0.83%

0.83%

 

Where Calvert has contractually agreed to a fee waiver and/or expense reimbursement, the expense limitation does not limit any acquired fund fees and expenses paid indirectly by a shareholder.  The Example in the respective Portfolio Summary reflects the expense limits set forth in the fee table but only through the contractual date.  Under the terms of a contractual expense limitation, operating expenses do not include interest expense, brokerage commissions, extraordinary expenses, and taxes. No Portfolio expects to incur a material amount of interest expense in the fiscal year.

 

See “Investment Advisor and Subadvisors” in the respective Portfolio’s Statement of Additional Information (“SAI”) for more information.

 

EXAMPLE

The Example in the Portfolio Summary of the respective Portfolio also assumes that you reinvest all dividends and distributions.

19 


 

 

MORE INFORMATION ON INVESTMENT STRATEGIES AND RISKS

Further description of investment strategies and techniques

A concise description of each Portfolio’s principal investment strategies and principal risks is under the earlier Portfolio Summary for the respective Portfolio. On the following pages are further descriptions of these principal investment strategies and techniques, as well as certain non-principal investment strategies and techniques of the Portfolios, along with their associated risks. Because the Portfolios invest in ETFs, they are also exposed to the risks associated with the securities underlying each ETF.  Each Portfolio has additional non-principal investment policies and restrictions, which are discussed under “Supplemental Information on Investment Policies and Risks” in the respective Portfolio’s SAI.

For certain investment strategies listed, the table below shows a Portfolio’s limitations as a percentage of either its net or total assets. Numbers in this table show maximum allowable amount only; for actual usage, consult the Portfolio’s Annual/Semi-Annual Reports. (Please see the pages of this Prospectus following the table for descriptions of the investment strategies and definitions of the principal types of risks involved. Explanatory information about certain investment strategies of specific Portfolios is also provided below.)

 

Key to Table

µ  Portfolio currently uses as a principal investment strategy

q Permitted, but not a principal investment strategy

û Not permitted

ü Underlying investment of an ETF

xN Allowed up to x% of Portfolio’s net assets

xT Allowed up to x% of Portfolio’s total assets

NA Not applicable to this Portfolio

 

 

Calvert VP Volatility Managed Moderate Portfolio

Calvert VP Volatility Managed Moderate Growth Portfolio

Calvert VP Volatility Managed Growth Portfolio

Investment Techniques

 

Fund-of-Funds

 

µ

µ

µ

Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs)

 

µ

µ

µ

Equity ETFs

 

44N

58N

76N

Fixed Income ETFs

 

65N

50N

35N

Sector ETFs

 

21N

22N

19N

Volatility Management

 

µ

µ

µ

Active Trading Strategy/Turnover

 

µ

µ

µ

 

Conventional Securities

 

 

Stocks in General

 

ü

ü

ü

Foreign securities

 

ü

ü

ü

Investment grade bonds

 

ü

ü

ü

Below-investment grade, high-yield bonds

 

ü

ü

ü

Unrated debt securities

 

ü

ü

ü

Illiquid securities

 

ü

ü

ü

20 


 

 

 

Unleveraged Derivative Securities

 

 

Asset-backed securities

 

ü

ü

ü

Mortgage-backed securities

 

ü

ü

ü

Currency contracts

 

ü

ü

ü

 

Leveraged Derivative Instruments

 

 

Options on securities and indices

 

ü,q1

ü,q1

ü,q1

Futures contracts

 

ü,µ1

ü,µ1

ü,µ1

 

1     To the extent that the Portfolios invest in these instruments, they intend to do so in accordance with Rule 4.5 under the Commodity Exchange Act.

 

Description of Investment Strategies and Associated Risks

The investment strategies listed in the table above are described below, and the principal types of risk involved with each strategy are listed. See the “Glossary of Certain Investment Risks” for definitions of these risk types.

 

Investment Techniques and Associated Risks

 

Fund-of-Funds seek to achieve the Portfolio’s investment objectives by investing in the shares of other investment companies, including exchange-traded funds, thereby achieving broad asset diversification.  

Risks: Market

 

Exchange-Traded Funds (“ETFs”) are shares of other investment companies that can be traded in the secondary market (e.g., on an exchange) but whose underlying assets are generally stocks selected to track a particular index.

Risks: Correlation and Market

 

Volatility Management involves the continuous monitoring of risk in a Portfolio and investing in certain derivative financial instruments to reduce the impact of that risk on the returns of the Portfolio.

 

Risks: Correlation, Information, Opportunity and Regulatory

 

Active Trading Strategy/Turnover involves selling a security soon after purchase. An active trading strategy causes a Portfolio to have higher portfolio turnover (exceeding 100%) compared to other funds and may translate to higher transaction costs, such as commissions and custodian and settlement fees.

 

Risks: Opportunity, Market and Transaction

 

Conventional Securities and Associated Risks

 

Stocks in General. Common stocks represent an ownership interest in a company. They may or may not pay dividends or carry voting rights. Common stock occupies the most junior position in a company’s capital structure. Debt securities and preferred stocks have rights senior to a company’s common stock. Stock prices overall may decline over short or even long periods. The type of stock (large-cap, mid-cap, growth, value, etc.) purchased pursuant to a Portfolio’s investment style tends to go through cycles of doing better or worse than the stock market in general, and its returns may trail returns of other asset classes. Finally, individual stocks may lose value for a variety of reasons, even when the overall stock market has increased. Factors which can negatively impact the value of common stocks include economic factors such as interest rates, and non-economic factors such as political events.

 

Risks: Market

 

Foreign securities. Foreign securities are securities issued by entities whose principal place of business is located outside the U.S. For any Portfolios that may invest in debt, this includes debt instruments denominated in other currencies such as Eurobonds.

 

Risks: Market, Currency, Transaction, Liquidity, Information and Political

 

Investment grade bonds. Bonds rated BBB-/Baa3 or higher in credit quality by Standard & Poor’s Ratings Services (“S&P”) or assigned an equivalent rating by another nationally recognized statistical rating organization (“NRSRO”), including Moody’s Investors Service or Fitch Ratings, or if unrated, considered to be of comparable credit quality by the Portfolio’s Advisor or Subadvisor.

 

Risks: Interest Rate, Market and Credit

 

Below-investment grade, high-yield bonds. Bonds rated below BBB-/Baa3 or unrated bonds determined by the Portfolio’s Advisor or Subadvisor to be of comparable credit quality are considered junk bonds. They are subject to greater credit and market risk than investment grade bonds. Junk bonds generally offer higher interest payments because the company that issues the bond is at greater risk of default (failure to repay the bond). This may be because the issuer is small or new to the market, has financial difficulties, or has a greater amount of debt.

 

Risks: Credit, Market, Interest Rate, Liquidity and Information

 

Unrated debt securities. Bonds that have not been rated by an NRSRO; the investment advisor to the ETF has determined the credit quality based on its own research.

 

Risks: Credit, Market, Interest Rate, Liquidity and Information

 

Illiquid securities. Securities which cannot be readily sold because there is no active market.

 

Risks: Liquidity, Market and Transaction

 

Unleveraged Derivative Securities and Associated Risks

 

Asset-backed securities. Securities backed by unsecured debt, such as automobile loans, home equity loans, equipment or computer leases or credit card debt. These securities are often guaranteed or over-collateralized to enhance their credit quality.

 

Risks: Credit, Interest Rate and Liquidity

 

Mortgage-backed securities. Securities backed by pools of mortgages, including classes of collateralized mortgage obligations (“CMOs”).

 

Risks: Credit, Extension, Prepayment, Liquidity and Interest Rate

 

Currency contracts. Contracts involving the right or obligation to buy or sell a given amount of foreign currency at a specified price and future date.

 

Risks: Currency, Leverage, Correlation, Liquidity and Opportunity

 

Leveraged Derivative Instruments and Associated Risks

 

Options on securities and indices. Contracts giving the holder the right but not the obligation to purchase or sell a security (or the cash value, in the case of an option on an index) at a specified price within or at a specified time. A call option gives the purchaser of the option the right to purchase the underlying security from the writer of the option at a specified exercise price. A put option gives the purchaser of the option the right to sell the underlying security to the writer of the option at a specified exercise price. In the case of writing options, a Portfolio will write call options only if it already owns the security (if it is “covered”).

 

Risks: Interest Rate, Currency, Market, Leverage, Correlation, Liquidity, Credit, Opportunity and Regulatory

 

Futures contracts. Agreements to buy or sell a specific amount of a commodity or financial instrument at a particular price on a specific future date.

 

Risks: Interest Rate, Currency, Market, Leverage, Correlation, Liquidity, Opportunity and Regulatory

21 


 

 

Glossary of Certain Investment Risks

Correlation risk

 

The risk that when a Portfolio “hedges,” two investments may not behave in relation to one another the way portfolio managers expect them to, which may have unexpected or undesired results. For example, a hedge may reduce potential gains or may exacerbate losses instead of reducing them.

 

Credit risk

 

The risk that the issuer of a security or the counterparty to an investment contract may default or become unable to pay its obligations when due.

 

Currency risk

 

The risk that when a Portfolio buys, sells or holds a security denominated in foreign currency, adverse changes in currency exchange rates may cause investment losses when a Portfolio’s investments are converted to U.S. dollars. Currency risk may be hedged or unhedged. Unhedged currency exposure may result in gains or losses as a result of a change in the relationship between the U.S. dollar and the respective foreign currency.

 

Extension risk

 

The risk that slower than anticipated payments (usually in response to higher interest rates) will extend the life of a mortgage-backed security beyond its expected maturity date, typically reducing the value of a mortgage-backed security purchased at a discount. In addition, if held to maturity, a Portfolio will not have access to the principal invested when expected and may have to forego other investment opportunities.

 

Information risk

 

The risk that information about a security or issuer or the market might not be available, complete, accurate, or comparable.

 

Interest rate risk

 

The risk that changes in interest rates will adversely affect the value of an investor’s fixed-income securities. When interest rates rise, the value of fixed-income securities will generally fall. Conversely, a drop in interest rates will generally cause an increase in the value of fixed-income securities. Longer-term securities and zero coupon/“stripped” coupon securities (“strips”) are subject to greater interest rate risk.

 

Leverage risk

 

The risk that occurs in some securities or techniques that tends to magnify the effect of small changes in an index or a market. Leverage can result in a loss that exceeds the amount actually invested.

 

Liquidity risk

 

The risk that occurs when investments cannot be readily sold. A Portfolio may have to accept a less-than-desirable price to complete the sale of an illiquid security or may not be able to sell it at all.

 

Market risk

 

The risk that securities prices in a market, a sector or an industry will fluctuate, and that such movements might reduce an investment’s value.

 

Opportunity risk

 

The risk of missing out on an investment opportunity because the assets needed to take advantage of it are committed to less advantageous investments or strategies.

 

Political risk

 

The risk that may occur when the value of a foreign investment may be adversely affected by nationalization, taxation, war, government instability or other economic or political actions or factors, including risk of expropriation.

 

Prepayment risk

 

The risk that faster than anticipated payments (usually in response to lower interest rates) will cause a mortgage-backed security to mature prior to its expected maturity date, typically reducing the value of a mortgage-backed security purchased at a premium. A Portfolio must also reinvest those assets at the current market rate, which may be lower.

 

Regulatory risk

 

The risk associated with employing certain regulated investment instruments or techniques. To the extent a Portfolio uses futures, options or other regulated derivatives, it intends to do so in accordance with Rule 4.5 under the Commodity Exchange Act (“CEA”) and therefore neither the Advisor, the Subadvisor, or the Portfolio anticipate being subject to registration or regulation as a commodity pool operator (“CPO”) or a commodity trading adviser (“CTA”) under the CEA as a result of the Portfolio’s activities. However, should the Subadvisor fail to use futures in accordance with Rule 4.5, then the Advisor and/or the Subadvisor would be subject to registration (if not already registered) and regulation in its capacity as the Portfolio’s CPO or CTA, and the Portfolio would be subject to regulation under the CEA. A Portfolio may incur additional expense as a result of the CFTC’s registration and regulation obligations, and its use of certain derivatives and other instruments may be limited or restricted.

Transaction risk

 

The risk that a Portfolio may be delayed or unable to settle a transaction or that commissions and settlement expenses may be higher than usual.

 

22 


 

 

Description of Certain Market Indices

Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Index

 

The index is an unmanaged index of 8,109 U.S. Treasury, government-related and investment grade corporate and securitized fixed income securities with a total market value of $17 trillion as of December 31, 2012. The index is primarily comprised of: obligations issued or guaranteed by the U.S. Government or its agencies or instrumentalities; and publicly-traded or 144A corporate and securitized fixed-income securities that either have a rating of BBB- or higher from Standard & Poor’s Ratings Services or Baa3 or higher from Moody’s Investors Service, Inc., or an equivalent rating from another nationally recognized statistical rating organization (“NRSRO”), or are expected to be rated at that level based on the actual ratings of the issuer’s other “index-eligible” fixed-income securities. Certain securities, such as floating-rate issues, bonds with equity-type features, private placements, inflation-linked bonds, and SEC Rule 144A securities without registration rights, among others, are excluded from the index. As of December 31, 2012, the average maturity of the securities in the index was 6.96 years, the average coupon was 3.57% and the modified duration was 4.97 years. The index includes all “index-eligible” securities that meet minimum par amounts outstanding.

Barclays U.S. Aggregate Float Adjusted Index

 

The index measures the total universe of public, taxable, investment-grade, fixed income securities in the United States—including government, corporate, and international dollar-denominated bonds, as well as mortgage-backed and asset-backed securities—all with maturities of more than 1 year. As of December 31, 2012, the index was comprised of 8,109 bonds.

Barclays U.S. Treasury Inflation Protected Securities (TIPS) Index

 

The index measures the performance of the inflation-protected public obligations of the U.S. Treasury, commonly known as “TIPS.” These securities are issued by the U.S. Treasury and are structured to provide protection against inflation by directly or indirectly adjusting the value of the bond’s principal or the interest income paid based (directly or indirectly) on changes in the official inflation measures reported by the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics.

Barclays High Yield Very Liquid Index

 

The index measures the performance of publicly issued U.S. dollar denominated high yield corporate bonds with above-average liquidity. High yield securities are generally rated below investment grade and are commonly referred to as “junk bonds.” The index includes publicly issued U.S. dollar denominated, non-investment grade, fixed-rate, taxable corporate bonds that have a remaining maturity of at least one year, are rated high-yield (Ba1/BB+/BB+ or below) using the middle rating of Moody’s Investors Service, Inc., Fitch Inc., or Standard & Poor’s, Inc., respectively, and have $600 million or more of outstanding face value. The index includes only corporate sectors.

MSCI All Country World ex USA Index

 

The index is a free float-adjusted market capitalization-weighted index designed to measure the combined equity market performance of developed and emerging markets countries, excluding the United States. As of December 31, 2012, the market capitalization of index companies ranged from $25 million to $210 billion with a median level of $567 million and an average level of $3 billion. The index is capitalization weighted, meaning that companies with larger market capitalizations will contribute more to the index’s value than companies with smaller market capitalizations.

MSCI EAFE Index

 

The index is an unmanaged index of common stocks comprised of 909 securities as of December 31, 2012, taken from the 22 MSCI country indices in developed foreign countries outside of North America that aims to include the top 85% of market capitalization in each industry group in each country. As of December 31, 2012, the market capitalization of index companies ranged from $514 million to $210 billion with a median level of $5.2 billion and an average level of $12 billion. The index is capitalization-weighted, meaning that companies with larger market capitalizations will contribute more to the index’s value than companies with smaller market capitalizations.

FTSE Emerging Index

 

The index is a market-capitalization weighted index representing the performance of 796 large and midcap companies in 22 emerging markets. As of December 31, 2012, the market capitalization of index companies ranged from $59 million to $86 billion with a median level of $2 billion and an average level of $4.4 billion.

MSCI U.S. REIT Index

 

The index is a benchmark of U.S. property trusts that covers about two-thirds of the value of the entire U.S. REIT market.

NASDAQ 100 Index

 

The index is an unmanaged index of 100 common stocks of the largest domestic and international non-financial companies on the broader NASDAQ Composite Index based on market capitalization. As of December 31, 2012, the market capitalization of index companies ranged from $4.4 billion to $501.4 billion with a median level of $11.9 billion and an average level of $30.7 billion. The index is modified capitalization-weighted, meaning that companies with larger market capitalizations will contribute more to the index’s value than a company whose securities have a smaller market capitalization.

S&P 500 Index

 

The index is a stock market index based on the common stock prices of 500 top publicly traded American companies, as determined by S&P. As of December 31, 2012 the market capitalization of index companies ranged from $1.6 billion to $501.4 billion with a median level of $12.6 billion and an average level of $27 billion. The index is capitalization-weighted, meaning that companies with larger market capitalizations will contribute more to the index’s value than companies with smaller market capitalizations.

S&P 500 Growth

 

The index measures the performance of the growth sector of the S&P 500. As of December 31, 2012 the market capitalization of index companies ranged from $2.4 billion to $501.4 billion with a median level of $13.5 billion and an average level of $30.7 billion. The index is capitalization-weighted, meaning that companies with larger market capitalizations will contribute more to the index’s value than companies with smaller market capitalizations.

S&P 500 Value

The index measures the performance of the value sector of the S&P 500. As of December 31, 2012 the market capitalization of index companies ranged from $1.6 billion to $394.6 billion with a median level of $11.7 billion and an average level of $24.9 billion. The index is capitalization-weighted, meaning that companies with larger market capitalizations will contribute more to the index’s value than companies with smaller market capitalizations.

S&P MidCap 400 Index

 

The index is an unmanaged index comprised of 400 common stocks of mid-sized U.S. companies. As of December 31, 2012 the market capitalization of index companies ranged from $403 million to $16.5 billion with a median level of $2.8 billion and an average level of $3.1 billion. The index is capitalization-weighted, meaning that companies with larger market capitalizations will contribute more to the index’s value than companies with smaller market capitalizations.

S&P MidCap 400 Growth Index

 

The index measures the performance of the mid-capitalization growth sector of the U.S. equity market. It is a subset of the S&P MidCap 400 Index and consists of those stocks in the S&P MidCap 400 Index exhibiting the strongest growth characteristics. As of December 31, 2012 the market capitalization of index companies ranged from $495 million to $16.5 billion with a median level of $3.4 billion and an average level of $3.7 billion.

S&P MidCap 400 Value Index

 

The index measures the performance of the mid-capitalization value sector of the U.S. equity market. It is a subset of the S&P MidCap 400 Index and consists of those stocks in the S&P MidCap 400 Index exhibiting the strongest value characteristics. As of December 31, 2012 the market capitalization of index companies ranged from $404 million to $9.2 billion with a median level of $2.5 billion and an average level of $2.8 billion.

Russell 2000 Index

The index measures the performance of the small-cap segment of the U.S. equity universe. The Russell 2000 is a subset of the Russell 3000 Index. As of December 31, 2012 the market capitalization of index companies ranged from $12 million to $4.7 billion with a median level of $510 million and a weighted average level of $1.3 billion.

S&P North American Natural Resources Sector Index

The index measures the performance of U.S.-traded stocks of natural resource-related companies in the United States and Canada. As of December 31, 2012 the market capitalization of index companies ranged from $856.6 million to $394.6 billion with a median level of $5 billion and an average level of $13.7 billion.

23 


 

 

PORTFOLIO HOLDINGS

Each Portfolio’s portfolio holdings are included in Semi-Annual and Annual Reports that are distributed to shareholders of the Portfolio. Each Portfolio also discloses its portfolio holdings in its Schedule of Investments on Form N-Q, which is filed with the SEC no later than 60 days after the close of the first and third fiscal quarters. These filings are publicly available at the SEC at www.sec.gov.

 

A description of each Portfolio’s policies and procedures with respect to disclosure of the Portfolio’s portfolio securities is available under “Portfolio Holdings Disclosure” in the respective Portfolio’s SAI.

 

MANAGEMENT OF PORTFOLIO INVESTMENTS

 

ABOUT CALVERT

Calvert Investment Management, Inc. (“Calvert” or the “Advisor”) 4550 Montgomery Avenue, Suite 1000N, Bethesda, MD 20814, is the investment advisor for the Portfolios. Calvert provides the Portfolios with investment supervision and management and office space, furnishes executive and other personnel to the Portfolios, and pays the salaries and fees of all Directors who are affiliated persons of and employed by Calvert. It has been managing mutual funds since 1976. As of March 31, 2013, Calvert was the investment advisor for 44 mutual fund portfolios and had over $12 billion in assets under management.

 

MORE INFORMATION ABOUT THE SUBADVISORS AND PORTFOLIO MANAGERS

Additional information is provided below regarding each individual and/or member of a team who is employed by or associated with the respective Subadvisors of each Portfolio, and who is primarily and jointly responsible for the day-to-day management of the Portfolio (each a “Portfolio Manager”). The Portfolios’ SAI provides additional information about each Portfolio Manager’s management of other accounts, compensation and ownership of securities in the Portfolio.

 

Calvert VP Volatility Managed Moderate Portfolio

Calvert VP Volatility Managed Moderate Growth Portfolio

Calvert VP Volatility Managed Growth Portfolio

Ameritas Investment Partners, Inc. (“AIP”), 390 North Cotner Blvd., Lincoln, NE 68505, is an investment subadvisor to the Portfolios.  Subject to the authority of the Portfolios’ Board of Directors and supervision by the Advisor, AIP is responsible for selecting portfolio securities for each Portfolio according to the Portfolio’s investment objective, principal investment strategies and restrictions.  AIP, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Ameritas Holding Company (“AHC”), was organized in 1984 under the laws of the State of Nebraska.  AHC is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Ameritas Mutual Holding Company.  AIP is an affiliate of Calvert.

 

Portfolio Manager

 

Business Experience During Last 5 Years

 

Role on Management Team

 

Gary R. Rodmaker, CFA

Managing Director of AIP

Team Leader

Kevin L. Keene, CFA

Assistant Portfolio Manager for AIP since April 2013; Equity Index and Derivatives Analyst for AIP from 2008 to 2013 (Senior Analyst since November 2011); Marketing Reporting Analyst for AIP 2006 to 2008

Team Member

 

 

Milliman Financial Risk Management LLC (“Milliman”), 71 South Wacker Drive, 31st Floor, Chicago, IL 60606, is an investment subadvisor to the Portfolios.  Subject to the authority of the Portfolios’ Board of Directors and supervision by the investment advisor, Milliman is responsible for conducting each Portfolio’s volatility management strategy according to the Portfolio’s investment objective, principal investment strategies and restrictions.  Milliman’s parent company, Milliman, Inc., was established in 1947 as an actuarial consultancy and has been providing pension consulting investment advisory services to corporations and pension plans for over 20 years. 

 

24 


 

 

Portfolio Manager

 

Business Experience During Last 5 Years

 

Role on Management Team

 

Adam Schenck, CFA, FRM

 

Financial Risk Management Portfolio Manager for Milliman

Portfolio Management Team Leader  

Blake Graves, FRM

Financial Risk Management Portfolio Manager for Milliman

Portfolio Management Team Member

 

 

________________________________________

 

Calvert and each Portfolio have obtained an exemptive order from the SEC to permit Calvert and the applicable Portfolio, pursuant to approval by the Portfolio’s Board of Directors, to enter into and materially amend contracts with the Portfolio’s Subadvisor, if any (that is not an “affiliated person” as defined under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”), without shareholder approval. See “Investment Advisor and Subadvisors” in the respective Portfolio’s SAI for further details.

 

ADVISORY FEES

The table below shows the anticipated annual advisory fee payable by each Portfolio as a percentage of that Portfolio’s average daily net assets. (Subadvisory fees paid by Calvert to a Subadvisor are reflected in the total advisory fees paid by the Portfolio to Calvert.)  The advisory fee does not include administrative fees.

 

Portfolio

 

Advisory Fee

 

Calvert VP Volatility Managed Moderate Portfolio

 

0.42%

 

Calvert VP Volatility Managed Moderate Growth Portfolio

 

0.42%

 

Calvert VP Volatility Managed Growth Portfolio

 

0.42%

 

 

________________________________________
A discussion regarding the basis for the approval by the Portfolios’ Board of Directors of the investment advisory agreement and any applicable subadvisory agreement with respect to each Portfolio will be available in the Semi-Annual Report of the respective Portfolio covering the six-month period ended on June 30.

 

INVESTOR INFORMATION

 

GENERAL INFORMATION ABOUT THE PORTFOLIOS

The rights of the Insurance Companies as shareholders differ from the rights of a Policy owner which are described in the Policies. The investment return experience of the Portfolio will affect the value of the Policy and the amount of annuity payments or life insurance benefits received under the Policy. Please see your Policy prospectus for a description of the relationship between increases or decreases in the net asset value of Portfolio shares (and any distributions on such shares) and the benefits provided under that Policy.

 

Purchase, Exchange and Redemption of Shares

Calvert Variable Products, Inc. (“Fund”) offers its shares, without sales charge, only for purchase by the Insurance Companies for allocation to their separate accounts (the “Variable Accounts”). Shares are purchased by the Variable Accounts at the net asset value (“NAV”) of a Portfolio next determined after the applicable Insurance Company receives the premium payment. The Fund continuously offers its shares in the Portfolio at a price equal to the NAV per share. Initial and subsequent payments allocated to the Portfolio are subject to the limits applicable in the Policies issued by the Insurance Companies.

It is conceivable that in the future it may be disadvantageous for both annuity Variable Accounts and life insurance Variable Accounts, or for Variable Accounts of different Insurance Companies, to invest simultaneously in a Portfolio, although currently neither the Insurance Companies nor the Fund foresee any such disadvantages to either variable annuity or variable life insurance Policy owners of any Insurance Company. The Fund’s Board of Directors intends to monitor events in order to identify any material conflicts between such Policy owners and to determine what action, if any, should be taken in response.

25 


 

 

The Insurance Companies redeem shares of the Portfolio to make benefit and surrender payments under the terms of the Policies. Redemptions are processed on any day on which the Fund is open for business (each day the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) is open), and are effected at the Portfolio’s NAV next computed after the applicable Insurance Company receives a surrender request in acceptable form. There are some federal holidays, i.e., Columbus Day and Veterans Day, when the NYSE is open and the Fund is open but redemptions cannot be wired because banks are closed.

Payment for redeemed shares will be made promptly, but in no event later than seven days after receiving a redemption request. The Fund reserves the right to suspend or postpone redemptions during any period when:

(a) trading on the NYSE is restricted, as determined by the SEC, or the NYSE is closed all day for other than customary weekend and holiday closings;

 (b) the SEC has granted an order to the Fund permitting such suspension; or

(c) an emergency, as determined by the SEC, exists, making disposal of portfolio securities or valuation of net assets of the Portfolio not reasonably practicable. 

The amount received upon redemption of the shares of the Portfolio may be more or less than the amount paid for the shares, depending upon the fluctuations in the market value of the assets owned by the Portfolio. The Portfolio has the right to redeem shares in assets other than cash for redemption amounts exceeding, in any 90-day period, $250,000 or 1% of the NAV of the Portfolio, whichever is less, by making redemptions-in-kind (distributions of a pro rata share of the portfolio securities, rather than cash). A redemption-in-kind transfers the transaction costs associated with redeeming the security from the Portfolio to the shareholder. The shareholder will also bear any market risks associated with the portfolio security until the security can be sold.

The Fund reserves the right to terminate or modify the exchange privilege with 60 days’ written notice.

How Shares are Priced

The price of shares is based on the Portfolio’s NAV. The NAV is computed by adding the value of the Portfolio’s securities holdings plus other assets, subtracting liabilities, and then dividing the result by the number of shares outstanding.

The NAV is calculated as of the close of each business day, which coincides with the closing of the regular session of the NYSE (generally 4 p.m. ET). The Portfolio is open for business each day the NYSE is open.

If the Portfolio holds securities that are primarily listed on foreign exchanges that trade on days when the NYSE is closed, it does not price shares on days when the NYSE is closed, even if foreign markets may be open. As a result, the value of the Portfolio’s shares may change on days when you will not be able to invest in or redeem shares of the Portfolio.

Generally, portfolio securities and other assets are valued based on market quotations.  Valuation techniques used to value the Portfolios’ investments by major category are as follows:

Equity securities and options on securities, including restricted securities, for which market quotations are readily available, are valued at the last reported sale price or official closing price as reported by an independent pricing service on the primary market or exchange on which they are traded. In the event there were no sales during the day or closing prices are not available, securities are valued at the last quoted bid price or may be valued using the last available price. 

Debt securities, including restricted securities, are valued based on evaluated prices received from independent pricing services or from dealers who make markets in such securities. For corporate bonds, floating-rate loans, municipal securities, and U.S. government and government agency obligations, pricing services utilize matrix pricing, which considers yield or price of bonds of comparable quality, coupon, maturity and type as well as dealer supplied prices.  For asset-backed securities, collateralized mortgage obligations, commercial mortgage securities, and U.S. government agency mortgage securities, pricing services utilize matrix pricing, which considers prepayment speed assumptions, attributes of the collateral, yield or price of bonds of comparable quality, coupon, maturity and type as well as dealer supplied prices. 

Exchange-traded funds and notes are valued at the official closing price as reported by an independent pricing service on the primary market or exchange on which they are traded.

Futures and options on futures are valued at last settlement price or, if there is no sale, latest available bid price.

Under the oversight of the Board of Directors, and pursuant to the Portfolio’s valuation procedures adopted by the Board, the Advisor determines when a market quotation is not readily available or reliable for a particular investment. Investments for which market quotations are not readily available or reliable are fair valued by a fair value team consisting of officers of the Fund and of the Advisor, as determined in good faith under consistently applied procedures under the general supervision of the Board of Directors. No single standard exists for determining fair value, which depends on the circumstances of each investment, but in general fair value is deemed to be the amount an owner might reasonably expect to receive for an investment upon its current sale.

26 


 

 

In making a fair value determination, under the ultimate supervision of the Board, the Advisor, pursuant to the Fund’s valuation procedures, generally considers a variety of qualitative and quantitative factors relevant to the particular investment or type of investment. These factors are subject to change over time and are reviewed periodically to ascertain whether there are changes in the particular circumstances affecting an investment which may warrant a change in either the valuation methodology for the investment, or the fair value derived from that methodology, or both. The general factors considered typically include, for example, fundamental analytical data relating to the investment, the nature and duration of restrictions, if any, on the investment, and the forces that influence the market in which the investment is purchased and sold, as well as the type of security, the size of the holding and numerous other specific factors. Foreign investments are valued based on quotations from the principal market in which such investments are normally traded. If events occur after the close of the principal market in which investments are traded, and before the close of business of the Portfolio, that are expected to materially affect the value of those investments, then they are valued at their fair value taking these events into account. In addition, fair value pricing may be used for high-yield debt securities or in other instances where a portfolio investment is not traded in significant volume for a substantial period.

The values assigned to fair value investments are based on available information and do not necessarily represent amounts that might ultimately be realized.  Further, because of the inherent uncertainty of valuation, the fair values may differ significantly from the value that would have been used had a ready market for the investment existed, and these differences could be material.

 

DISTRIBUTION AND SERVICE FEES

Each Portfolio has adopted a plan under Rule 12b-1 of the 1940 Act that allows the Portfolio to pay distribution fees for the sale and distribution of its Class F shares. The distribution plan also allows each Portfolio to pay service fees to persons (such as a financial professional, bank, retirement plan service provider or insurance company) for services provided to shareholders. See “Method of Distribution” in the respective Portfolio’s SAI for further discussion of these services. Because these fees are paid out of a Portfolio’s assets on an ongoing basis, over time these fees will increase the cost of your investment and may cost you more than paying other types of sales charges. The fee will not exceed, on an annual basis, 0.25% of the average daily net assets attributable to the Portfolio’s Class F shares.

 

Market Timing Policy

In general, the Portfolios are designed for long-term investment and not as a frequent or short-term trading (“market timing”) vehicle. The Fund does not accommodate frequent purchases and redemptions of Portfolio shares. Accordingly, the Fund’s Board of Directors has adopted policies and procedures in an effort to detect and prevent market timing in each Portfolio. The Board believes that market timing activity is not in the best interest of shareholders. Market timing can be disruptive to the portfolio management process and may adversely impact the ability of Calvert and the Subadvisors to implement a Portfolio’s investment strategies. In addition, market timing can disrupt the management of a Portfolio and raise its expenses through: increased trading and transaction costs; forced and unplanned portfolio turnover; time-zone arbitrage for securities traded on foreign markets; and large asset swings that decrease a Portfolio’s ability to provide maximum investment return to all shareholders. This in turn can have an adverse effect on performance. The Fund or the distributor at its discretion may reject any purchase or exchange request (purchase side only) it believes to be market timing. However, there is no guarantee that Calvert will detect or prevent market timing activity.

Shareholders may hold the shares of the Portfolios through a financial intermediary which has adopted market timing policies that differ from the market timing policies adopted by the Fund’s Board of Directors. In formulating their market timing policies, these financial intermediaries may or may not seek input from Calvert regarding certain aspects of their market timing policies, such as the minimum holding period or the applicability of trading blocks. Accordingly, the market timing policies adopted by a financial intermediary may be quite dissimilar from the policies adopted by the Fund’s Board of Directors. The Board of Directors has authorized Fund management to defer to the market timing policies of any financial intermediary that distributes shares of the Portfolios through an omnibus account if the financial intermediary’s policies, in Fund management’s judgment, are reasonably designed to detect and deter market timing transactions. Shareholders may contact Calvert to determine if the financial intermediary through which the shareholder holds Portfolio shares has been authorized by Fund management to apply its own market timing policies in lieu of the policies adopted by the Fund’s Board of Directors. In the event of any such authorization, shareholders should contact the financial intermediary through which the Portfolio shares are held for more information on the market timing policies that apply to those shares.

Portfolio shares are generally held through insurance company separate accounts. The Portfolios are available as an investment option under a number of different variable insurance products. Calvert monitors cashflows of the Portfolios to help detect market timing.

Owners of these variable insurance products transfer value among subaccounts of the insurance company separate accounts by contacting the Insurance Companies. The resulting purchases and redemptions of Portfolio shares are made through omnibus accounts of the Insurance Companies.  The right of an owner of such a variable insurance product to transfer among subaccounts is governed by a contract between the Insurance Company and such owner.  Many of the Policies do not limit the number of transfers among the available underlying funds that a Policy owner may make.  The terms of these contracts, the presence of financial intermediaries (including the Insurance Companies) between the Fund and Policy owners, the utilization of omnibus accounts by these intermediaries and other factors such as state insurance laws may limit the Fund’s ability to detect and deter market timing. Although the Fund has adopted policies and procedures to detect and prevent market timing in the Portfolios, because of the unlimited number of transfers permitted under some Policies, some Policy owners could engage in more frequent trading than others.

27 


 

 

Calvert expects all financial intermediaries that maintain omnibus accounts to make reasonable efforts to identify and restrict the short-term trading activities of underlying participants in the Portfolios. Calvert will seek full cooperation from the financial intermediary maintaining the account to identify any underlying owner suspected of market timing. Calvert expects such intermediary to take immediate action to stop any further market timing activity in the Portfolios by such owner, or else the affected Portfolio(s) will be withdrawn as an investment option for that account.

The Fund and the distributor reserve the right at any time to reject or cancel any part of any purchase or exchange order (purchase side only), including any purchase or exchange offer accepted by any Policy owner’s financial intermediary. Orders are canceled within one business day, and the purchase price is returned to the investor. The Fund and the distributor may modify any terms or conditions of purchase of Portfolio shares (upon prior notice), or withdraw all or any part of the offering made by this Prospectus.

 

Dividends and Distributions

It is the Fund’s intention to distribute substantially all of each Portfolio’s net investment income, if any, on an annual basis. For dividend purposes, net investment income of a Portfolio consists of interest income and dividends declared and paid on investments, less expenses.  All net realized capital gains, if any, of each Portfolio are declared and distributed periodically, no less frequently than annually. All dividends and distributions are made to the Insurance Companies, not Policy owners, and are reinvested in additional shares of the applicable Portfolio at NAV rather than cash.

 

 

28 


 

 

For investors who want more information about the Portfolios, the following documents are available free upon request:

 

Annual/Semi-Annual Reports: Additional information about each Portfolio’s investments is available in the Portfolio’s Annual and Semi-Annual Reports to shareholders. In each Portfolio’s Annual Report, you will find a discussion of the market conditions and investment strategies that significantly affected the Portfolio’s performance during its last fiscal year.

 

Statement of Additional Information (SAI): The SAI for each Portfolio provides more detailed information about the Portfolio, including a description of each Portfolio’s policies and procedures with respect to the disclosure of its portfolio holdings. The SAI for each Portfolio is incorporated into this Prospectus by reference, which means it is legally considered to be part of this Prospectus.

 

You can get free copies of reports and SAIs, request other information and discuss your questions about the Portfolios by contacting your financial professional, or the Portfolios at:

 

Calvert Investments, Inc.
4550 Montgomery Ave.
Suite 1000N
Bethesda, MD 20814
Telephone: 1-800-368-2745

 

 

Each Portfolio also makes available its SAI and its Annual and Semi-Annual Reports free of charge on Calvert’s website at the following Internet address:

www.calvert.com

 

You can review and copy information about a Portfolio (including its SAI) at the SEC’s Public Reference Room in Washington, D.C. Information on the operation of the public reference room may be obtained by calling the SEC at 1-202-551-8090. Reports and other information about the Portfolios are available on the EDGAR database on the SEC’s Internet site at http://www.sec.gov. Copies of this information may also be obtained, upon payment of a duplicating fee, by electronic request at publicinfo@sec.gov, or by writing to the Public Reference Section of the SEC, Washington, D.C. 20549-1520.

 

 

Investment Company Act file:

 

No. 811-04000 Calvert Variable Products, Inc.

 

Printed on recycled paper using soy inks

 

 

Calvert Variable Products (“VP”) Portfolios                                                                                          Calvert Investments®

 

 

CALVERT VARIABLE PRODUCTS, INC.

Calvert VP Volatility Managed Moderate Portfolio

Calvert VP Volatility Managed Moderate Growth Portfolio

Calvert VP Volatility Managed Growth Portfolio

 

4550 Montgomery Avenue, Suite 1000N, Bethesda, Maryland 20814

 

Statement of Additional Information

 

April 30, 2013

 

                This Statement of Additional Information ("SAI") is not a prospectus. Investors should read the SAI in conjunction with the Prospectus of the applicable Portfolio (collectively, the “Portfolios”) of Calvert Variable Products, Inc. (the “Fund”), dated April 30, 2013. Each Portfolio’s Prospectus may be obtained free of charge by writing the respective Portfolio at the above address, calling the Portfolio at (800) 368-2748, or by visiting our website at www.calvert.com.

 

 

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

 

Supplemental Information on Principal Investment Policies and Risks of the Portfolios

2

Supplemental Information on Investment Policies and Risks of the Portfolios and the Underlying ETFs

3

Supplemental Information on Principal Investment Policies and Risks of Non-ETF Investments Made by the Portfolios

14

Additional Risk Disclosure

16

Investment Restrictions

17

Dividends, Distributions, and Taxes

18

Net Asset Value

18

Calculation of Total Return

18

Purchase and Redemption of Shares

19

Trustees and Officers

19

Investment Advisor and Subadvisors

25

Portfolio Manager Disclosure

26

Administrative Services Agent

32

Method of Distribution

32

Transfer and Shareholder Servicing Agents

33

Portfolio Transactions

34

Portfolio Holdings Disclosure

34

Personal Securities Transactions

37

Proxy Voting Disclosure

37

Process for Delivering Shareholder Communications to the Board of Trustees

37

Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm and Custodian

38

General Information

38

Control Persons and Principal Holders of Securities

39

Fund Service Providers

39

Appendix A - Global Proxy Voting Guidelines

 

Appendix B - Corporate Bond & Commercial Paper Ratings

 

 


 

 

SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION ON PRINCIPAL INVESTMENT POLICIES

AND RISKS OF THE PORTFOLIOS

 

Exchange-Traded Funds

Each Portfolio seeks to achieve its investment objective by investing primarily in exchange-traded funds (“ETFs” or “underlying ETFs”).  ETFs are shares of other investment companies that can be traded in the secondary market (e.g., on an exchange) and whose underlying assets are generally stocks or fixed income securities selected to track a particular index. Therefore, an ETF can track the performance of an index in much the same way as a traditional indexed mutual fund. But unlike many traditional investment companies, which are only bought and sold at closing NAV, ETFs are tradable in the secondary market on an intra-day basis, and are redeemed principally in-kind at each day's next calculated NAV.  Although there can be no guarantee that an ETF’s intra-day price changes will accurately track the price changes of the related index, ETFs benefit from an in-kind redemption mechanism that is designed to protect ongoing shareholders from adverse effects on the ETFs that could arise from frequent cash creation and redemption transactions. Moreover, in contrast to conventional indexed mutual funds where redemptions can have an adverse tax impact on shareholders because of the need to sell portfolio securities (which sales may generate taxable gains), the in-kind redemption mechanism of the ETFs generally will not lead to a taxable event for the ETF or its ongoing shareholders.

                Some of the risks of investing in ETFs are similar to those of investing in an indexed mutual fund, including (i) market risk (the risk of fluctuating stock prices in general), (ii) asset class risk (the risk of fluctuating prices of the stocks represented in the ETF's index), (iii) tracking error risk (the risk of errors in matching the ETF's underlying assets to the index), (iv) industry concentration risk (the risk of the stocks in a particular index being concentrated in an industry performing poorly relative to other stocks) and (v) the risk that since an ETF is not actively managed it cannot sell poorly performing stocks as long as they are represented in the index. In addition, an ETF may trade at a discount from its NAV and because ETFs operate as open-end investment companies or unit investment trusts, they incur fees that are separate from the fees incurred directly by the Portfolios.  Therefore, a Portfolio’s purchase of an ETF results in the layering of expenses, such that shareholders of the Portfolio indirectly bear a proportionate share of any operating expenses of each ETF.

 

Limitations on Investments under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (“1940 Act”)

Section 12(d)(1) of the 1940 Act generally prohibits a Portfolio from acquiring: (i) more than 3% of another open-end investment company’s voting stock; (ii) securities of another open-end investment company with a value in excess of 5% of a Portfolio’s total assets (“5% Limit”); or (iii) securities of such other open-end investment company and all other open-end investment companies owned by a Portfolio having a value in excess of 10% of the Portfolio’s total assets (“10% Limit”). In addition, Section 12(d)(1) generally prohibits another open-end investment company from selling its shares to a Portfolio if, after the sale: (i) the Portfolio owns more than 3% of the other open-end investment company’s voting stock or (ii) the Portfolio and other investment companies, and companies controlled by them, own more than 10% of the voting stock of such other investment company. Some underlying ETFs have obtained exemptive orders permitting other investment companies, such as the Portfolios, to acquire their securities in excess of the Section 12(d)(1) limits of the 1940 Act. The Portfolios currently are not relying on such exemptive orders.  However, the Portfolios may choose to rely on them in the future, and if they do so choose, they will comply with the conditions specified in such exemptive orders at that time. Otherwise, each Portfolio’s ETF investments will comply with Section 12(d)(1) of the 1940 Act.

Section 12(d)(1)(F) of the 1940 Act provides that the provisions of paragraph 12(d)(1) shall not apply to securities purchased or otherwise acquired by a Portfolio if (i) immediately after such purchase or acquisition not more than 3% of the total outstanding stock of such registered investment company is owned by the Portfolio and all affiliated persons of the Portfolio; and (ii) the Portfolio has not, and is not proposing to offer or sell any security issued by it through a principal underwriter or otherwise at a public offering price which includes a sales load of more than 1½% percent. An investment company that issues shares to a Portfolio pursuant to paragraph 12(d)(1)(F) shall not be required to redeem its shares in an amount exceeding 1% of such investment company’s total outstanding shares in any period of less than thirty days. When the Portfolio exercises voting rights, by proxy or otherwise, with respect to investment companies owned by the Portfolio, Section 12(d)(1)(F) also requires the Portfolio (or the Advisor acting on behalf of the Portfolio) to either seek instruction from the Portfolio’s shareholders with regard to the voting of all proxies and vote in accordance with such instructions, or vote the shares held by the Portfolio in the same proportion as the vote of all other holders of such security.

2

 


 

 

Each Portfolio and any “affiliated persons,” as defined by the 1940 Act, may purchase in the aggregate only up to 3% of the total outstanding securities of any ETF pursuant to Section 12(d)(1)(F). Accordingly, when affiliated persons (such as other Portfolios of the Trust) hold shares of any of the ETFs, the Portfolio’s ability to invest fully in shares of those ETFs is restricted, and the Adviser must then, in some instances, select alternative investments that would not have been its first preference. Section 12(d)(1)(F) of the 1940 Act also provides that an ETF whose shares are purchased by a Portfolio will be obligated to redeem shares held by the Portfolio (to the extent that the Portfolio seeks redemption of those shares) only in an amount up to 1% of the ETF’s outstanding securities during any period of less than 30 days. Shares held by a Portfolio in excess of 1% of an ETF’s outstanding securities therefore, may under certain circumstances be considered not readily marketable securities, which, together with other such securities, may not exceed 15% of the Portfolio’s total assets.  However, each Portfolio generally will trade ETF shares on secondary markets, and will look to those secondary markets for the purpose of determining whether the underlying ETFs are readily marketable.

Further, each Portfolio may rely on Rule 12d1-3, which allows unaffiliated mutual funds to exceed the 5% Limit and the 10% Limit, provided the aggregate sales loads any investor pays (i.e., the combined distribution expenses of both the acquiring fund and the acquired funds) does not exceed the limits on sales loads established by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc. (“FINRA”) for funds of funds.

Under certain circumstances an ETF may determine to make payment of a redemption by a Portfolio wholly or partly by a distribution in kind of securities from its portfolio, in lieu of cash, in conformity with the rules of the SEC. In such cases, the Portfolio may hold securities distributed by an ETF until the Adviser determines that it is appropriate to dispose of such securities.

 

SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION ON INVESTMENT POLICIES

AND RISKS OF THE PORTFOLIOS AND THE UNDERLYING ETFs

 

                The following discussion identifies the investment policies and risks of the Portfolios, the underlying ETFs and the securities which comprise the index each ETF tracks.  The discussion of each investment policy and risk is applicable to each Portfolio through its own activities or the investments of the underlying ETFs, unless indicated otherwise. 

 

Foreign Securities

Investments in foreign securities may present risks not typically involved in domestic investments.  These securities are subject to the risk of currency fluctuation relative to the U.S. dollar.  Foreign securities may also involve different accounting, auditing, and financial reporting standards and various administrative difficulties such as delays in clearing and settling portfolio trades or in receiving payment of dividends or other distributions.  The Portfolios and the underlying ETFs may also invest in American Depositary Receipts ("ADRs") and other receipts evidencing ownership of foreign securities, such as Global Depositary Receipts ("GDRs"). ADRs are United States ("U.S.") dollar-denominated and traded in the United States on exchanges or over the counter, and can be either sponsored or unsponsored. The company sponsoring the ADR is subject to U.S. reporting requirements and will pay the costs of distributing dividends and shareholder materials.  With an unsponsored ADR, the U.S. bank will recover costs from the movement of share prices and the payment of dividends. Less information is normally available on unsponsored ADRs. By investing in ADRs rather than directly in foreign issuers' stock, the Portfolios and the underlying ETFs may avoid some currency and some liquidity risks. However, the value of the foreign securities underlying the ADR may still be impacted by currency fluctuations.  The information available for ADRs is subject to the more uniform and more exacting accounting, auditing and financial reporting standards of the domestic market or exchange on which they are traded. GDRs can involve currency risk since they may not be U.S. dollar-denominated.

                Additional costs may be incurred in connection with international investment since foreign brokerage commissions and the custodial costs associated with maintaining foreign portfolio securities are generally higher than in the United States. Fee expense may also be incurred on currency exchanges when the Portfolio or the underlying ETFs change investments from one country to another or convert foreign securities holdings into U.S. dollars.

                U.S. government policies have at times, in the past, through imposition of currency controls, changes in tax policy and other restrictions, discouraged certain investments abroad by U.S. investors. In addition, foreign countries may impose withholding and taxes on dividends and interest.

 

3

 


 

 

Emerging Market Securities.  Investing in emerging markets and in particular, those countries whose economies and capital markets are not as developed as those of more industrialized nations, carries its own special risks. Emerging market can be defined as any country (other than the United States or Canada) that is not included in the MSCI Europe, Australasia, Far East ("EAFE") (Standard) Index. Investments in these countries may be riskier, and may be subject to erratic and abrupt price movements. Some economies are less well developed and less diverse, and more vulnerable to the ebb and flow of international trade, trade barriers and other protectionist or retaliatory measures. Many of these countries are grappling with severe inflation or recession, high levels of national debt, and currency exchange problems. Governments in many emerging market countries participate to a significant degree in their economies and securities markets.  Investments in countries or regions that have recently begun moving away from central planning and state-owned industries toward free markets should be regarded as speculative. Among other risks, the economies of such countries may be affected to a greater extent than in other countries by price fluctuations of a single commodity, severe cyclical climatic conditions, lack of significant history in operating under a market-oriented economy or political instability.  Certain emerging market countries have historically experienced, and may continue to experience, high rates of inflation, high interest rates, exchange rate fluctuations, large amounts of external debt, balance of payments and trade difficulties and extreme poverty and unemployment.

 

Variable Rate Obligations and Demand Notes

                Variable rate obligations have a yield that is adjusted periodically based on changes in the level of prevailing interest rates. Variable rate obligations can have an interest rate fixed to a known lending rate, such as the LIBOR Index or SIFMA Index, and are automatically adjusted when the known rate changes. Variable rate obligations lessen the capital fluctuations usually inherent in fixed income investments. This diminishes the risk of capital depreciation of variable rate obligations and demand notes and, consequently, of the shares of the Portfolios or underlying ETFs that invest in such securities. However, if interest rates decline, the yield of these securities will decline, causing the Portfolios and the underlying ETFs that hold such securities to forego the opportunity for capital appreciation.

Variable rate demand notes provide that the holder may demand payment of the note at its par value plus accrued interest by giving notice to the paying agent and/or dealer. To ensure the ability of the issuer to make payment on demand, a bank letter of credit or other liquidity facility may support the note.

 

Tracking The Index

The process used by each underlying ETF to attempt to track the applicable index within its expected tracking error limit relies on assessing the difference between the ETF’s exposure to factors which influence returns and the index's exposure to those same factors. The combined variability of these factors and the correlation between factors are used to estimate the risk in the ETF. The extent to which the total risk characteristics of the ETF vary from that of the index is active risk or tracking error.

 

Small-Cap Issuers

                The securities of small-cap issuers may be less actively traded than the securities of larger-cap issuers, may trade in a more limited volume, and may change in value more abruptly than securities of larger companies.

                Information concerning these securities may not be readily available so the securities’ issuers may be less actively followed by stock analysts. Small-cap issuers do not usually participate in market rallies to the same extent as more widely known securities, and they tend to have a relatively higher percentage of insider ownership.

                Investing in smaller, new issuers generally involves greater risk than investing in larger, established issuers. Small-cap issuers may have limited product lines, markets, or financial resources and may lack management depth. The securities in such companies may also have limited marketability and may be subject to more abrupt or erratic market movements than securities of larger, more established companies or the market averages in general.

                The small cap issuers in which an underlying ETF invests may include some micro-cap securities. The prices of micro-cap securities are generally even more volatile and their markets are even less liquid relative to small-cap, mid-cap and large-cap securities. Micro-cap companies are more likely to have more limited product lines, fewer capital resources and less depth of management than larger companies. Therefore, an underlying ETF that holds micro-cap securities may involve considerably more risk of loss and its returns may differ significantly from ETFs that do not invest in micro-cap securities.

 

4

 


 

 

Mid-Cap Issuers

                The securities of mid-cap issuers often have greater price volatility, lower trading volume, and less liquidity than the securities of larger, more established companies.  Investing in mid-cap issuers generally involves greater risk than investing in larger, established issuers. These companies tend to have smaller revenues, narrower product lines, less management depth and experience, smaller shares of their product or service markets, fewer financial resources, and less competitive strength than larger companies.     

 

Large-Cap Issuers

                Investing in large-cap issuers generally involves the risk that these companies may grow more slowly than the economy as a whole or not at all. Compared to small and mid-cap companies, large cap companies are more widely followed in the market, which can make it more difficult to find attractive stocks that are not overpriced. Large-cap stocks also may be less responsive to competitive opportunities and challenges, such as changes in technologies, and may offer less potential for long-term capital appreciation.  

 

Real Estate Investment Trusts

Real estate investment trusts ("REITs") are issuers that invest directly in real estate and whose securities trade on exchanges.  Risks associated with investments in securities of companies in the real estate industry include: a decline in the value of real estate; risks related to general and local economic conditions; overbuilding and increased competition; increases in property taxes and operating expenses; changes in zoning laws; casualty or condemnation losses; variations in rental income; changes in the value of neighborhoods; the appeal of properties to tenants; and increases in interest rates.  In addition, equity REITs, which own real estate properties, may be affected by changes in the values of the underlying property owned by the REITS, while mortgage REITs, which make construction, development, and long-term mortgage loans, may be affected by the quality of credit extended. REITs are dependent upon management skills, may not be diversified, and are subject to the risks of financing projects. REITs are also subject to heavy cash flow dependency, defaults by borrowers, self-liquidation and the possibility of failing to qualify for tax-free pass-through of income under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and failing to maintain exemption from the 1940 Act.  If an issuer of debt securities collateralized by real estate defaults, REITs could end up holding the underlying real estate. REITs also have expenses themselves that are ultimately paid by the shareholder.

 

Short-Term Instruments

Money market instruments are generally short-term investments that may include but are not limited to:     (i) short-term obligations issued or guaranteed by the U.S. government, its agencies or instrumentalities (including government-sponsored enterprises); (ii) negotiable certificates of deposit, bankers’ acceptances, fixed time deposits and other obligations of U.S. and foreign banks (including foreign branches) and similar instruments;                    (iii) commercial paper; (iv) repurchase agreements; (v) short-term U.S. dollar-denominated obligations of foreign banks (including U.S. branches) that are determined to be of comparable quality to obligations of U.S. banks; and (vi) money market funds.  Time deposits are non-negotiable deposits maintained in banking institutions for specified periods of time at stated interest rates. Bankers’ acceptances are time drafts drawn on commercial banks by borrowers, usually in connection with international transactions.

 

Inflation Indexed or Adjusted Securities

The Portfolios or the underlying ETFs may invest in inflation-indexed bonds or inflation adjusted securities. Inflation indexed and adjusted securities are fixed income securities whose principal value or interest income is periodically adjusted based (directly or indirectly) on the rate of inflation. The U.S. Treasury and other issuers use a structure that adjusts the principal value of the bond based on the rate of inflation. Other issuers adjust their periodic coupon payment of interest using an inflation adjustment.

Inflation-indexed securities currently issued by the U.S. Treasury have maturities of five, ten or thirty years. However, it is possible that securities with other maturities may be issued. U.S. Treasury Inflation indexed securities pay, on a semi-annual basis, interest equal to a fixed percentage of the inflation-adjusted principal amount. For example, if a Portfolio or an underlying ETF purchased an inflation-indexed bond with a par value of $1,000 and a 3% real rate of return coupon (payable 1.5% semi-annually), and inflation over the first six months was 1%, the mid-year par value of the bond would be $1,010 and the first semi-annual interest payment would be $15.15 ($1,010 times 1.5%). If inflation during the second half of the year resulted in the whole years' inflation equaling 3%, the end-of-year par value of the bond would be $1,030 and the second semi-annual interest payment would be $15.45 ($1,030 times 1.5%).

5

 


 

 

If the periodic adjustment rate measuring inflation falls, the principal value of inflation-indexed bonds will be adjusted downward, and consequently the interest payable on these securities (calculated with respect to a smaller principal amount) will be reduced. Repayment of the original bond principal upon maturity (as adjusted for inflation) is guaranteed in the case of U.S. Treasury inflation-indexed bonds, even during a period of deflation. However, the current market value of the bonds is not guaranteed, and will fluctuate.

The Portfolios or the underlying ETFs may also invest in other inflation related bonds which may or may not provide a similar guarantee. If a guarantee of principal is not provided, the adjusted principal value of the bond repaid at maturity may be less than the original principal.

The value of inflation-indexed or adjusted securities is expected to change in response to changes in real interest rates. Real interest rates in turn are tied to the relationship between current stated (or nominal) interest rates and the rate of inflation. Therefore, if inflation were to rise at a faster rate than nominal interest rates, real interest rates might decline, leading to an increase in the value of inflation-indexed or adjusted securities. Conversely, if nominal interest rates increased at a faster rate than inflation, real interest rates might rise and lead to a decrease in the value of inflation-indexed or adjusted bonds. Accordingly, if interest rates rise due to reasons other than inflation (for example, due to changes in currency exchange rates), investors in these securities may not be protected to the extent that the increase is not reflected in the bond's inflation measure. While these securities are expected to be protected from long-term inflationary trends, short-term increases in inflation may lead to a decline in value.

Adjustments for U.S. inflation-indexed bonds issued by the U.S. Treasury are based on the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers ("CPI-U"), which is calculated monthly by the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. The CPI-U is a measurement of changes in the cost of living, made up of components such as housing, food, transportation and energy. Other inflation protected securities issued by a foreign government are generally adjusted to reflect a comparable inflation index, calculated by that government. Other domestic issuers of inflation adjusted securities may utilize other measures and indications of inflation. There can be no assurance that the CPI-U or any other foreign or domestic inflation index will accurately measure the real rate of inflation in the prices of goods and services. Moreover, there can be no assurance that the rate of inflation in a foreign country will be correlated to the rate of inflation in the United States.

 

U.S. Government-Sponsored Obligations

                U.S. government-sponsored obligations are debt and mortgage-backed securities issued by the Federal National Mortgage Association ("FNMA") and Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation ("FHLMC"), commonly known as Fannie Maes and Freddie Macs, respectively.

Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. Unlike Government National Mortgage Association ("GNMA") certificates, which are typically interests in pools of mortgages insured or guaranteed by government agencies, FNMA and FHLMC certificates represent undivided interests in pools of conventional mortgage loans. Both FNMA and FHLMC guarantee timely payment of principal and interest on their obligations, but this guarantee is not backed by the full faith and credit of the U.S. government. FNMA's guarantee is supported by its ability to borrow from the U.S. Treasury, while FHLMC's guarantee is backed by reserves set aside to protect holders against losses due to default.

   In September 2008, the Federal Housing Finance Agency ("FHFA") placed FNMA and FHLMC into conservatorship with the objective of returning the entities to normal business operations; FHFA succeeded to all rights, titles, powers and privileges of FNMA and FHLMC. Simultaneously, the U.S. Treasury made a commitment of indefinite duration to maintain the positive net worth of both firms.  FNMA and FHLMC are continuing to operate as going concerns while in conservatorship and each remains liable for all of its obligations, including its guaranty obligations, associated with its mortgage-backed securities.

 

U.S. Government-Backed Obligations

                U.S. government-backed obligations include debt and mortgage-backed securities issued by GNMA, commonly known as Ginnie Maes, and other U.S. government-backed obligations.

                Ginnie Mae. Ginnie Maes are typically interests in pools of mortgage loans insured by the Federal Housing Administration or guaranteed by the Veterans Administration. A "pool" or group of such mortgages is assembled and, after approval from GNMA, is offered to investors through various securities dealers. GNMA is a U.S. government corporation within the Department of Housing and Urban Development. Ginnie Maes are backed by the full faith and credit of the United States, which means that the U.S. government guarantees that interest and principal will be paid when due.

6

 


 

 

Other U.S. Government Obligations. The Portfolios and the underlying ETFs may invest in other obligations issued or guaranteed by the U.S. government, its agencies, or its instrumentalities. (Certain obligations issued or guaranteed by a U.S. government agency or instrumentality may not be backed by the full faith and credit of the United States.)

 

Below-investment Grade, High-Yield Debt Securities

                Below-investment grade, high-yield debt securities are lower quality debt securities (generally those rated BB+ or lower by Standard & Poor’s Ratings Services ("S&P") or Ba1 or lower by Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. ("Moody's"), known as "junk bonds"). These securities have moderate to poor protection of principal and interest payments and have speculative characteristics. (See Appendix B for a description of the ratings.)  Below-investment grade, high-yield debt securities involve greater risk of default or price declines due to changes in the issuer's creditworthiness than investment-grade debt securities. Because the market for lower-rated securities may be thinner and less active than for higher-rated securities, there may be market price volatility for these securities and limited liquidity in the resale market. Market prices for these securities may decline significantly in periods of general economic difficulty or rising interest rates. Unrated debt securities may fall into the lower quality category. Unrated securities usually are not attractive to as many buyers as rated securities are, which may make them less marketable.

 

Repurchase Agreements

Repurchase agreements are arrangements in which a Portfolio or an underlying ETF buys a security, and the seller simultaneously agrees to repurchase the security at a mutually agreed-upon time and price reflecting a market rate of interest. Repurchase agreements are short-term money market investments, designed to generate current income. A fund engages in repurchase agreements in order to earn a higher rate of return than it could earn simply by investing in the obligation which is the subject of the repurchase agreement.

Repurchase agreements are not, however, without risk. In the event of the bankruptcy of a seller during the term of a repurchase agreement, a legal question exists as to whether the fund would be deemed the owner of the underlying security or would be deemed only to have a security interest in and lien upon such security.  If the seller defaults on its obligation to repurchase the applicable security and the value of that security declines, the Portfolio or underlying ETF may incur a loss and may incur expenses in selling that security.

The Portfolios will apply certain investment standards to help mitigate these risks, but the underlying ETFs may or may not have comparable standards.  The Portfolios will only engage in repurchase agreements with recognized securities dealers and banks determined to present minimal credit risk by the Advisor under the direction and supervision of the Portfolios’ Board of Directors.  In addition, the Portfolios will only engage in repurchase agreements reasonably designed to secure fully during the term of the agreement the seller’s obligation to repurchase the applicable security and will monitor the market value of the applicable security during the term of the agreement.  If the value of the applicable security declines and is not at least equal to the repurchase price due to the Portfolio pursuant to the agreement, the Portfolio will require the seller to pledge additional securities or cash to secure the seller’s obligations pursuant to the agreement.

While an underlying security may mature after one year, repurchase agreements are generally for periods of less than one year. Repurchase agreements not terminable within seven days are considered illiquid.

 

Reverse Repurchase Agreements

Under a reverse repurchase agreement, a Portfolio or an underlying ETF sells portfolio securities to a bank or securities dealer and agrees to repurchase those securities from such party at an agreed upon date and price reflecting a market rate of interest. The Portfolio or the underlying ETF invests the proceeds from each reverse repurchase agreement in obligations in which it is authorized to invest. Generally a Portfolio or an underlying ETF enters into a reverse repurchase agreement only when the interest income expected to be earned on the obligation in which the Portfolio or the underlying ETF plans to invest the proceeds exceeds the amount the Portfolio or the underlying ETF will pay in interest to the other party to the agreement plus all costs associated with the transaction. The Portfolios will apply certain investment standards when entering into reverse repurchase agreements, but the underlying ETFs may or may not have comparable standards. 

The Portfolios do not intend to borrow for leverage purposes.  The Portfolios will only be permitted to pledge assets to the extent necessary to secure borrowings and reverse repurchase agreements.  During the time a reverse repurchase agreement is outstanding, the Portfolios will maintain in a segregated custodial account an amount of cash, U.S. government securities or other liquid, high-quality debt securities at least equal in value to the repurchase price.  The Portfolios will mark to market the value of assets held in the segregated account, and will place additional assets in the account whenever the total value of the account falls below the amount required under applicable regulations.

7

 


 

 

A Portfolio’s or underlying ETF’s use of reverse repurchase agreements involves the risk that the other party to the agreements could become subject to bankruptcy or liquidation proceedings during the period the agreements are outstanding. In such event, the Portfolio or the underlying ETF may not be able to repurchase the securities it has sold to that other party. Under those circumstances, if at the expiration of the agreement such securities are of greater value than the proceeds obtained by the Portfolio or the underlying ETF under the agreement, the Portfolio or the underlying ETF may have been better off had it not entered into the agreement. However, the Portfolios will enter into reverse repurchase agreements only with banks and dealers which the Advisor believes present minimal credit risks under guidelines adopted by the Portfolios’ Board.  

 

Collateralized Mortgage Obligations

                Collateralized mortgage obligations ("CMOs") are collateralized bonds that are general obligations of the issuer of the bonds. CMOs are not direct obligations of the U.S. government. CMOs generally are secured by collateral consisting of mortgages or a pool of mortgages. The collateral is assigned to the trustee named in the indenture pursuant to which the bonds are issued. Payments of principal and interest on the underlying mortgages are not passed through directly to the holder of the CMO; rather, payments to the trustee are dedicated to payment of interest on and repayment of principal of the CMO. This means that the character of payments of principal and interest is not passed through, so that payments to holders of CMOs attributable to interest paid and principal repaid on the underlying mortgages or pool of mortgages do not necessarily constitute income and return of capital, respectively, to the CMO holders. Also, because payments of principal and interest are not passed through, CMOs secured by the same pool of mortgages may be, and frequently are, issued with a variety of classes or series, which have different maturities and are retired sequentially. CMOs are designed to be retired as the underlying mortgages are repaid. In the event of prepayment on such mortgages, the class of CMO first to mature generally will be paid down.

                FHLMC has introduced a CMO which is a general obligation of FHLMC. This requires FHLMC to use its general funds to make payments on the CMO if payments from the underlying mortgages are insufficient.

 

Interest Only and Principal Only Mortgage-Backed Securities

                Interest Only (“IO”) mortgage-backed securities generally increase in value in a rising interest rate environment, which typically results in a slower rate of prepayments on the underlying mortgages and extends the period during which interest payments are required to be made on the IO security. Interest only securities are subject to prepayment risk, which is the risk that prepayments will accelerate in a declining interest rate environment and will reduce the number of remaining interest payments even though there is no default on the underlying mortgages.

                Principal Only (“PO”) mortgage-backed securities generally increase in value in a declining interest rate environment, which typically results in a faster rate of prepayments on the underlying mortgages. Since a PO security is usually purchased at a discount, faster prepayments result in a higher rate of return when the face value of the security is paid back sooner than expected. Principal only securities are subject to extension risk, which is the risk that a rising interest rate environment will result in a slower rate of prepayments and will delay the final payment date.

 

Asset-Backed Securities

                Asset-backed securities are securities that represent a participation in, or are secured by and payable from, a stream of payments generated by particular assets, most often a pool or pools of similar assets (e.g., trade receivables). The credit quality of these securities depends primarily upon the quality of the underlying assets and the level of credit support and/or enhancement provided.

                The underlying assets (e.g., loans) are subject to prepayments, which shorten the securities’ weighted average maturity and may lower their return. If the credit support or enhancement is exhausted, losses or delays in payment may result if the required payments of principal and interest are not made. The value of these securities also may change because of changes in the market’s perception of the creditworthiness of the servicing agent for the pool, the originator of the pool, or the financial institution or trust providing the credit support or enhancement. Typically, there is no perfected security interest in the collateral that relates to the financial assets that support asset-backed securities.

8

 


 

 

Municipal Securities  

Municipal securities share the attributes of debt obligations in general, but are generally issued by states, municipalities and other political subdivisions, agencies, authorities and instrumentalities of states and multi-state agencies or authorities. These securities include general obligation bonds and limited obligation bonds (or revenue bonds), including industrial development bonds issued pursuant to former federal tax law. General obligation bonds are obligations involving the credit of an issuer possessing taxing power and are payable from such issuer’s general revenues and not from any particular source. Limited obligation bonds are payable only from the revenues derived from a particular facility or class of facilities or, in some cases, from the proceeds of a special excise or other specific revenue source. Tax-exempt private activity bonds and industrial development bonds generally are also revenue bonds and thus are not payable from the issuer’s general revenues. The credit and quality of private activity bonds and industrial development bonds are usually related to the credit of the user of the facilities. Payment of interest on and repayment of principal of such bonds is the responsibility of the user (and/or any guarantor).

Municipal securities are subject to credit and market risk. Generally, prices of higher quality issues tend to fluctuate less with changes in market interest rates than prices of lower quality issues, and prices of longer maturity issues tend to fluctuate more than prices of shorter maturity issues. Prices and yields on municipal bonds are dependent on a variety of factors, including general money-market conditions, the financial condition of the issuer, general conditions of the municipal bond market, the size of a particular offering, the maturity of the obligation and the rating of the issue. A number of these factors, including the ratings of particular issues, are subject to change from time to time. Information about the financial condition of an issuer of municipal bonds may not be as extensive as that which is made available by corporations whose securities are publicly traded. Obligations of issuers of municipal bonds are subject to the provisions of bankruptcy, insolvency and other laws, such as the Federal Bankruptcy Reform Act of 1978, affecting the rights and remedies of creditors. Congress or state legislatures may seek to extend the time for payment of principal or interest, or both, or to impose other constraints upon enforcement of such obligations. There is also the possibility that as a result of litigation or other conditions, the power or ability of issuers to meet their obligations for the payment of interest and principal on their municipal bonds may be materially affected or their obligations may be found to be invalid or unenforceable.

 

Leveraged Loans  

Investments in loans are subject to interest rate risk and credit risk. Interest rate risk refers to fluctuations in the value of a loan resulting from changes in the general level of interest rates. Credit risk refers to the possibility that the borrower of a loan will be unable and/or unwilling to make timely interest payments and/or repay the principal on its obligation. Circumstances surrounding default in the payment of interest or principal on a loan may result in a reduction in the value of the loan and a potential decrease in the net asset value (“NAV”). Although leveraged loans are generally secured by specific collateral, there can be no assurance that such collateral would satisfy the borrower’s obligation in the event of non-payment of scheduled interest or principal or that such collateral could be readily liquidated. In the event of the bankruptcy of a borrower, the Portfolio’s or underlying ETF’s access to the collateral may be limited by bankruptcy and, therefore, the Portfolio or underlying ETF could experience delays or limitations with respect to its ability to realize the benefits of the collateral securing a loan. 

There is no organized exchange on which loans are traded, and reliable market quotations may not be readily available. Therefore, elements of judgment may play a greater role in valuation of loans than for securities with a more developed secondary market, and the Portfolio or underlying ETF may not realize full value in the event of the need to sell a loan. To the extent that a secondary market does exist for certain loans, the market may be subject to irregular trading activity, wide bid/ask spreads and extended trade settlement periods.  Many loans are not registered with the SEC or any state securities commission and are not often rated by any nationally recognized statistical rating organization (“NRSRO”). Generally there is less readily-available, reliable information about most loans than is the case for many other types of securities.

Some loans are subject to the risk that a court, pursuant to fraudulent conveyance or other similar laws, could subordinate the loans to presently existing or future indebtedness of the borrower or take other action detrimental to lenders such as invalidation of loans or causing interest previously paid to be refunded to the borrower. Investments in loans are also subject to the risk of changes in legislation or state or federal regulations. Such legislation or regulations may impose additional requirements or restrictions on the ability of financial institutions to make loans and thereby reduce the availability of leveraged loans for investment.

Although a loan may be senior to equity and other debt securities in a borrower’s capital structure, such obligations may be structurally subordinated to obligations of the borrower’s subsidiaries. From time to time, one or more of the factors described above may create volatility in the markets for debt instruments and decrease the liquidity of the loan market.

9

 


 

 

 

Securities With Equity And Debt Characteristics

Securities that have a combination of equity and debt characteristics may at times behave more like equity than debt or vice versa.  Some types of convertible bonds, preferred stocks or other preferred securities automatically convert into common stock or other securities at a stated conversion ratio and some may be subject to redemption at the option of the issuer at a predetermined price.  These securities, prior to conversion, may pay a fixed rate of interest or a dividend. Because convertible securities have both debt and equity characteristics, their values vary in response to many factors, including the values of the securities into which they are convertible, general market and economic conditions, as well as changes in the credit quality of the issuer.

 

Illiquid Securities

Certain of the underlying ETFs may be able to invest in illiquid securities and such investments may be subject to certain limitations.  Each Portfolio may not purchase illiquid securities if more than 15% of the value of its net assets would be invested in such securities.  The Advisor will monitor the amount of illiquid securities in each Portfolio, under the supervision of the Portfolio’s Board, to ensure compliance with the Portfolio’s investment restrictions.

Historically, illiquid securities have included securities subject to contractual or legal restrictions on resale because they have not been registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities Act"), securities that are otherwise not readily marketable, and repurchase agreements having a maturity of longer than seven days. Securities that have not been registered under the Securities Act are referred to as private placement or restricted securities and are purchased directly from the issuer or in the secondary market.  Mutual funds do not typically hold a significant amount of these restricted or other illiquid securities because of the potential for delays on resale and uncertainty in valuation.  Limitations on resale may have an adverse effect on the marketability of the securities, and a Portfolio might be unable to sell restricted or other illiquid securities promptly or at reasonable prices.

Notwithstanding the above, the Portfolios and certain of the underlying ETFs may purchase securities which, while privately placed, are eligible for purchase and sale under Rule 144A under the Securities Act.  This rule permits certain qualified institutional buyers, such as the Portfolios and the underlying ETFs, to trade in privately placed securities even though such securities are not registered under the Securities Act.  If the Portfolio’s Board determines, based upon a continuing review of Rule 144A securities, that any such securities held by the Portfolio are liquid, they will not be subject to the 15% limit on illiquid investments.  The Portfolio’s Board has adopted guidelines as part of the Pricing Procedures and delegated to the Advisor the daily function of determining the liquidity of restricted securities.  The Board retains sufficient oversight and is ultimately responsible for the determinations.

Restricted securities will be priced at fair value as determined in accordance with procedures prescribed by the Portfolio’s Board.

 

Options

The Portfolios may purchase put and call options and write covered call options and secured put options on securities, and may employ a variety of option combination strategies.  In addition, the Portfolios may write covered call options and secured put options on futures contracts.  Certain of the underlying ETFs may be able to purchase or write put or call options, although such activities may be subject to certain limitations. 

The Portfolios may engage in such transactions only for hedging purposes, including implementation of the Portfolio’s volatility management strategy and hedging of the Portfolio’s cash position. The Portfolios may not engage in such transactions for the purposes of speculation or leverage.  Such investment policies and techniques may involve a greater degree of risk than those inherent in more conservative investment approaches.

Options are typically classified as either American-style or European-style, based on the dates on which the option may be exercised. American-style options may be exercised at any time prior to the expiration date, and European-style options may be exercised on the expiration date. Option contracts traded on futures exchanges are mainly American-style, and options traded over-the-counter are mainly European-style.

The value of an option will fluctuate based primarily on the time remaining until expiration of the option, known as the option’s time value, and the difference between the then-prevailing price of the underlying security and the option’s exercise price.  This difference, known as the option’s intrinsic value, determines whether an option is in-the-money, at-the-money or out-of-the-money at any point in time.  If there is an existing secondary market for an option, it can be closed out at any time by the Portfolio for a gain or a loss.  Alternatively, the holder of an in-the-money American-style option may exercise the option at any time prior to the expiration date, while the holder of an in-the-money European-style option must wait until the expiration date to exercise the option.  Options that expire out-of-the-money are worthless resulting in a loss of the entire premium paid.

10

 


 

 

                Other principal factors that affect the market value of an option include supply and demand, interest rates,  and the current market price and price volatility of the underlying security.

 

Purchasing Options.  The purchaser of an option will pay a premium (plus any commission).  The premium reflects the total of the option’s time value and intrinsic value.  The purchaser of an option has a right to buy (in the case of a call option) or sell (in the case of a put option) the underlying security at the exercise price and has no obligation after the premium has been paid.

Call Options.  The purchase of a call option on a security is similar to taking a long position because the value of the option generally increases as the price of the underlying security increases.  However, in the event that the underlying security declines in value, losses on options are limited to the premium paid to purchase the option.  Although a call option has the potential to increase in value from higher prices for the underlying security, because the option will expire on its expiration date, any such gains may be more than offset by reductions in the option’s time value or other valuation factors.  Each Portfolio may only buy call options to implement the volatility management strategy, to hedge its available cash balance, to limit the risk of a substantial increase in the market price of a security which a Portfolio intends to purchase, or to close an outstanding position that resulted from writing a corresponding call option.  Any profit or loss from such a closing transaction will depend on whether the amount received is more or less than the premium paid for the call option plus the related transaction costs.  The Portfolios may purchase securities by exercising a call option solely on the basis of considerations consistent with the investment objectives and policies of the Portfolio.  The underlying ETFs, to the extent they purchase call options, may be subject to different limitations.

Put Options.  The purchase of a put option on a security is similar to taking a short position (selling a security that you do not own) in that security because the value of the option generally increases as the value of the underlying security decreases.  However, in the event that the underlying security increases in value, losses on the option are limited to the premium paid to purchase the option.  Although a put option has the potential to increase in value from lower prices for the underlying security, because the option will expire on its expiration date, any such gains may be more than offset by reductions in the option’s time value or other valuation factors.  The Portfolios may purchase put options to implement the volatility management strategy, to protect portfolio securities against the risk of declining prices or to close an outstanding position that resulted from writing a corresponding put option.  Any profit or loss from such a closing transaction will depend on whether the amount received is more or less than the premium paid for the put option plus the related transaction costs.  The underlying ETFs, to the extent they purchase put options, may be subject to different limitations.

 

Writing Options.   The Portfolios and certain of the underlying ETFs may write certain types of options.  Writing options means selling an investor the right, but not the obligation, to purchase (in the case of a call option) or to sell (in the case of a put option) a security or index at the exercise price in exchange for the option premium.  The writer of an option has the obligation to sell (in the case of a call option) or buy (in the case of a put option) the underlying security and has no rights other than to receive the premium.  Writing options involves more risk than purchasing options because a writer of an option has the potential to realize a gain that is limited to the value of the premium (less any commission) and takes on potentially unlimited risk from increases in the price of the underlying security, in the case of a call option, and the risk that the underlying security may decline to zero, in the case of a put option (which would require the writer of the put option to pay the exercise price for a security that is worthless).  Accordingly, the Portfolio may only write covered call options and secured put options, which mitigate these substantial risks.   A call option is deemed "covered" if the underlying fund owns the security.  A put option is deemed "secured" if the Portfolio has segregated cash or securities having an aggregate value equal to the total purchase price the Portfolio will have to pay if the put option is exercised.  The underlying ETFs, to the extent they write call or put options, may be subject to different limitations.

Call Options.   A Portfolio or underlying ETF that writes a call option on a security will receive the option premium (less any commission), which helps to mitigate the effect of any depreciation in the market value of that security.  However, because the Portfolio or underlying ETF is obligated to sell that security at the exercise price, this strategy also limits the Portfolio's or underlying ETF’s ability to benefit from an increase in the price of the security above the exercise price.

11

 


 

 

Each Portfolio may write covered call options on securities.  This means that as long as the Portfolio is obligated as the writer of a call option, the Portfolio will own the underlying security.  The Portfolio may write such options in order to receive the premiums from options that expire and to seek net gains from closing purchase transactions with respect to such options. Writing covered call options can increase the income of the Portfolio and thus reduce declines in the net asset value per share of the Portfolio if securities covered by such options decline in value. Exercise of a call option by the purchaser, however, will cause the Portfolio to forego future appreciation of the securities covered by the option. The Portfolio's turnover may increase through the exercise of a call option that it has written; this will generally occur if the market value of the underlying security increases and the Portfolio has not entered into a closing purchase transaction. When the Portfolio writes a covered call option, it will realize a profit in the amount of the premium, less a commission, so long as the price of the underlying security remains below the exercise price.

Put Options.    A Portfolio or underlying ETF that writes a put option on a security will receive the option premium (less any commission), which effectively reduces the Portfolio's or underlying ETF’s acquisition cost for that security.  A Portfolio or underlying ETF that is contemplating an investment in a security but that is uncertain about its near-term price trajectory could write a put option on a security; the premium will provide the Portfolio or underlying ETF with a partial buffer against a price increase, while providing the Portfolio or underlying ETF with an opportunity to acquire the security at the lower exercise price.  However, the Portfolio or underlying ETF remains obligated to purchase the underlying security from the buyer of the put option (usually in the event the price of the security falls below the exercise price).  Accordingly, this strategy may result in unexpected losses if the option is exercised against the Portfolio or underlying ETF at a time when the price of the security has declined below the exercise price by more than the amount of the premium received.

The Portfolios may only write secured put options, which require the Portfolio to segregate cash or securities, through its custodian, having a value at least equal to the exercise price of the put option.  If the value of the segregated securities declines below the exercise price of the put option, the Portfolio will have to segregate additional assets.  When the Portfolio writes a secured put option, it will realize a profit in the amount of the premium, less a commission, so long as the price of the underlying security remains above the exercise price.

 

Exchange-Traded Options.   The Portfolios or underlying ETFs may purchase and write put and call options in standard contracts traded on national securities exchanges on securities of issuers.  Options exchanges may provide liquidity in the secondary market. There can be no assurance that a secondary market will exist for any particular option contract at any particular time. The absence of a liquid market might prevent the Portfolio or underlying ETF from closing an options position, which could impair the Portfolio’s or underlying ETF’s ability to hedge effectively. The inability to close out a written option position may have an adverse effect on the Portfolio’s or underlying ETF’s liquidity because it may be required to hold the securities covering or securing the option until the option expires or is exercised.

The information provided above under "Purchasing Options" and "Writing Options" is applicable to exchange-traded options. 

 

Options on Futures Contracts.    The Portfolios may purchase put or call options, write secured put options or write covered call options on futures contracts that the Portfolios could otherwise invest in and that are traded on a U.S. exchange or a board of trade.  The Portfolios may also enter into closing transactions with respect to such options to terminate an existing position.

Each Portfolio may only invest in options on futures contracts to implement the volatility management strategy or to hedge its portfolio securities or its available cash balance, and not for speculation or leverage purposes.

Certain of the underlying ETFs may be able to purchase put or call options on futures contracts, although such activities may be subject to certain limitations.  

The information provided above under "Purchasing Options" and "Writing Options" is applicable to options on futures contracts, except that references therein to securities should instead refer to futures contracts.

 

Additional Risks of Options.  If the Portfolios or underlying ETFs take options positions to hedge against a decline in the market and the market later advances, the Portfolios or underlying ETFs may suffer a loss on the options that they would not have experienced if they had not hedged. Correlation is also imperfect between movements in the prices of futures contracts and movements in prices of the securities which are the subject of the hedge. Thus the price of the option may move more than or less than the price of the securities being hedged. Where the Portfolio or underlying ETF has taken options positions to hedge against a decline in the market, the price of the futures contract may advance and the value of the portfolio securities in the Portfolio or underlying ETF may decline. If this were to occur, the Portfolio or underlying ETF might lose money on the options and also experience a decline in the value of its portfolio securities.

12

 


 

 

                The hours of trading for options on U.S. government securities may not correspond exactly to the hours of trading for the underlying securities. To the extent that the options markets close before the U.S. government securities markets close, significant movements in rates and prices may occur in the Government securities markets that cannot be reflected in the options markets.

The Portfolios can close out options on futures in the secondary market only on an exchange or board of trade or with an OTC market maker. Although the Portfolios intend to purchase or write only such options for which an active secondary market appears to exist, there can be no assurance that such a market will exist for any particular option at any particular time. This might prevent a Portfolio from closing an option on a futures contract, which could require the Portfolio to make daily margin payments in the event of adverse price movements. If the Portfolio cannot close out an option position, it may be required to exercise the option to realize any profit or the option may expire worthless.

 

Derivatives

Derivatives generally involve various techniques to increase or decrease exposure to changing security prices, interest rates, or other factors that affect security values. These techniques may involve transactions such as buying and selling options and futures contracts and leveraged notes, entering into swap agreements, and purchasing indexed securities for the purpose of adjusting the risk and return characteristics of a Portfolio or underlying ETF. Generally, each Portfolio can use these practices either as a substitute for alternative permissible investments or as protection against a move that has an adverse effect on the Portfolio's portfolio securities. The underlying ETFs may be subject to different limitations when investing in derivatives.  These techniques may increase the volatility of the Portfolios or underlying ETFs and may involve a small investment of cash relative to the magnitude of the risk assumed. Derivatives are often illiquid, which can make it difficult to value them.  Derivatives may result in loss of principal.

 

Lending Portfolio Securities

Each Portfolio and certain underlying ETFs may lend portfolio securities, provided the aggregate value of the securities loaned will not exceed 33 1/3% of total assets.

The advantage of a securities loan is that the lender continues to receive the equivalent of the interest earned or dividends paid by the issuers on the loaned securities while at the same time earning interest on the cash or equivalent collateral which may be invested in accordance with the Portfolio’s or underlying ETF's investment objective, policies, and restrictions.

                Securities loans are usually made to broker-dealers and other financial institutions to facilitate their delivery of such securities. As with any extension of credit, there may be risks of delay in recovery and possibly loss of rights in the loaned securities should the borrower of the loaned securities fail financially. On termination of the loan, the borrower is obligated to return the securities to the lender. The lender will recognize any gain or loss in the market value of the securities during the loan period. The lender may pay reasonable custodial fees in connection with the loan.

 

Temporary Defensive Positions

For temporary defensive purposes – which may include a lack of adequate purchase candidates or an unfavorable market environment – the Portfolios may invest in cash or cash equivalents. Cash equivalents include instruments such as, but not limited to, U.S. government and agency obligations, certificates of deposit, banker's acceptances, time deposits, commercial paper, short-term corporate debt securities, and repurchase agreements.  The Portfolios' investments in temporary defensive positions are generally not insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, even though a bank may be the issuer.

                The Portfolios may invest in money market instruments of banks, whether foreign or domestic, including obligations of U.S. branches of foreign banks ("Yankee" instruments) and obligations of foreign branches of U.S. banks ("Eurodollar" instruments). All such instruments must be high-quality, U.S. dollar-denominated obligations. Although not subject to foreign currency risk since they are U.S. dollar-denominated, investments in foreign money market instruments may involve risks that are different than investments in securities of U.S. issuers. See "Foreign Securities" in "Supplemental Information on Investment Policies and Risks of The Portfolios and Underlying ETFs."

 

13

 


 

 

SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION ON PRINCIPAL INVESTMENT POLICIES AND RISKS OF

NON-ETF INVESTMENTS MADE BY THE PORTFOLIOS

 

Futures Transactions

Each Portfolio may purchase and sell futures contracts in accordance with the principal investment strategies discussed in the prospectus for each Portfolio and under the supervision of the Advisor and the applicable Subadvisor.  These futures contracts may include, but are not limited to, market index futures contracts and futures contracts based on U.S. government obligations.

 

Futures Contracts

A financial futures contract is an agreement between two parties to buy and sell a specified quantity of financial instruments such as U.S. Treasury bills, notes and bonds, stock, commercial paper and bank certificates of deposit or the cash value of a financial instrument or index at a specified future date at a price agreed upon when the contract is made. The value of a unit of a stock index future is based on the current value of the contract index. Under such contracts no delivery of the actual stocks making up the index takes place. Rather, upon expiration of the contract, settlement is made by exchanging cash in an amount equal to the difference between the contract price and the closing price of the index at expiration, net of variation margin previously paid.

Substantially all futures contracts are closed out before settlement date or called for cash settlement. A futures contract is closed out by buying or selling an identical offsetting futures contract. Upon entering into a futures contract, a Portfolio is required to deposit an initial margin with the custodian for the benefit of the futures broker. The initial margin serves as a "good faith" deposit that the Portfolio will honor its future commitments. Subsequent payments (called "variation margin") to and from the broker are made on a daily basis as the price of the underlying financial instrument fluctuates.  Because the value of an index future depends primarily on the value of the applicable underlying index, the performance of the broad-based contracts will generally reflect broad changes in common stock prices. However, because an underlying ETF may not be invested in precisely the same proportion as its respective index (such as the S&P 500 or S&P MidCap 400), it is likely that the price changes of a Portfolio's index futures positions will not exactly correspond to the price changes of the Portfolio's investments in the related underlying ETF.

Futures contracts are designed by boards of trade which are designated “contracts markets” by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission ("CFTC"). Futures contracts trade on contracts markets in a manner that is similar to the way a stock trades on a stock exchange, and the boards of trade, through their clearing corporations, guarantee performance of the contracts.  The principal financial futures exchanges in the United States are the Board of Trade of the City of Chicago, the Chicago Mercantile Exchange, the New York Futures Exchange and the Kansas City Board of Trade. Futures exchanges and trading in the United States are regulated under the Commodity Exchange Act by the CFTC.

 

Regulatory Limitations. The Advisor to the Portfolios has claimed an exclusion from the CFTC’s definition of “commodity pool operator.” Under the relevant CFTC rule, the Advisor can claim an exclusion with respect to a Portfolio if the Portfolio, among other things, limits its use of certain derivatives, such as futures, certain options, and swaps.  Under the rule, if a fund uses commodity interests (such as futures contracts, options on futures contracts and swaps) other than for bona fide hedging purposes (as defined by the CFTC) the aggregate initial margin and premiums required to establish these positions (after taking into account unrealized profits and unrealized losses on any such positions and excluding the amount by which options are “in-the-money” at the time of purchase) may not exceed 5% of a fund’s NAV, or alternatively, the aggregate net notional value of those positions, as determined at the time the most recent position was established, may not exceed 100% of the fund’s NAV (after taking into account unrealized profits and unrealized losses on any such positions). If a Portfolio’s use of futures contracts does not comply with these limits, then the Advisor and/or the Subadvisor would be subject to registration (if not already registered) and regulation in its capacity as the Portfolio’s commodity pool operator or commodity trading adviser, respectively, and the Portfolio would be subject to regulation under the Commodity Exchange Act. A Portfolio may incur additional expense as a result of the CFTC’s registration and regulation obligations, and its use of certain derivatives and other instruments may be limited or restricted.

The Portfolios generally intend to engage in transactions in futures contracts and options thereon only for hedging, risk management, volatility management and other permissible purposes in accordance with the rules and regulations of the CFTC or other regulatory authorities.

14

 


 

 

In instances involving the purchase of futures contracts or call options thereon or the writing of put options thereon by a Portfolio, an amount of cash, U.S. Government securities or other liquid securities, equal to the notional value of the futures contracts and options thereon (less any related margin deposits), will be segregated by the Portfolios' custodian to cover the position, or alternative cover will be employed, thereby ensuring that the use of such futures contracts and options is unleveraged.

 

Volatility and Leverage. The prices of futures contracts are volatile and are influenced, among other things, by actual and anticipated changes in the market and interest rates, which in turn are affected by fiscal and monetary policies, national and international policies, and economic events.

Most United States futures exchanges limit the amount of fluctuation permitted in futures contract prices during a single trading day. The daily limit establishes the maximum amount that the price of a futures contract may vary either up or down from the previous day's settlement price at the end of a trading session. Once the daily limit has been reached in a particular type of futures contract, no trades may be made on that day at a price beyond that limit. The daily limit governs only price movement during a particular trading day and therefore does not limit potential losses, because the limit may prevent the liquidation of unfavorable positions. Futures contract prices have occasionally moved to the daily limit for several consecutive trading days with little or no trading, thereby preventing prompt liquidation of futures positions and subjecting some futures traders to substantial losses.

Because of the low margin deposits required, futures trading involves an extremely high degree of leverage. As a result, a relatively small price movement in a futures contract may result in immediate and substantial loss or gain to a Portfolio. For example, if at the time of purchase, 10% of the value of a futures contract is deposited as margin, a subsequent 10% decrease in the value of the futures contract would result in a total loss of the margin deposit, before any deduction for the transaction costs, if the account were then closed out. A 15% decrease would result in a loss equal to 150% of the original margin deposit, if the contract were closed out. Thus, a purchase or sale of a futures contract may result in losses in excess of the amount invested in the futures contract. However, a Portfolio would presumably have sustained comparable losses if, instead of the futures contract, it had invested in the underlying instrument and sold it after the decline. Furthermore, in the case of a futures contract purchase, in order to be certain that a Portfolio has sufficient assets to satisfy its obligations under a futures contract, the Portfolio earmarks to the futures contract an amount of cash, U.S. Government securities or other liquid securities equal in value to the current notional value of the underlying instrument less the margin deposit.

 

Liquidity. A Portfolio may elect to close some or all of its futures positions at any time prior to their expiration. A Portfolio would do so to reduce exposure represented by long futures positions or increase exposure represented by short futures positions. A Portfolio may close its positions by taking opposite positions which would operate to terminate the Portfolio's position in the futures contracts. Final determinations of variation margin would then be made, additional cash would be required to be paid by or released to the Portfolio, and the Portfolio would realize a loss or a gain.

Futures contracts may be closed out only on the exchange or board of trade where the contracts were initially traded. Although a Portfolio intends to purchase or sell futures contracts only on exchanges or boards of trade where there appears to be an active market, there is no assurance that a liquid market on an exchange or board of trade will exist for any particular contract at any particular time. In such event, it might not be possible to close a futures contract, and in the event of adverse price movements, the Portfolio would continue to be required to make daily cash payments of variation margin. However, in the event futures contracts have been used to hedge the ETFs and/or other securities held by a Portfolio (“Portfolio Investments”), the Portfolio would continue to hold such Portfolio Investments subject to the hedge until the futures contracts could be terminated. In such circumstances, an increase in the price of the Portfolio Investments, if any, might partially or completely offset losses on the futures contract. However, as described below, there is no guarantee that the price of the Portfolio Investments will in fact correlate with the price movements in the futures contract and thus provide an offset to losses on a futures contract.

 

Hedging Risk. A decision of whether, when, and how to hedge involves skill and judgment, and even a well-conceived hedge may be unsuccessful to some degree because of unexpected market behavior, or market or interest rate trends. There are several risks in connection with the use by the Portfolios of futures contracts as a hedging device. One risk arises because of the imperfect correlation between movements in the prices of the futures contracts and movements in the prices of the Portfolio Investments that are the subject of the hedge. The Advisor or applicable Subadvisor will, however, attempt to reduce this risk by entering into futures contracts whose movements, in its judgment, will have a significant correlation with movements in the prices of the Portfolio Investments that are the subject of the hedge.

15

 


 

 

Successful use of futures contracts by the Portfolios for hedging purposes is also subject to the Advisor's and/or Subadvisor's ability to correctly predict movements in the direction of the market. It is possible that, when a Portfolio has sold futures to hedge its portfolio against a decline in the market, the index, indices, or Portfolio Investments on which the futures are written might advance and the value of the Portfolio Investments might decline. If this were to occur, the Portfolio would lose money on the futures and also would experience a decline in value in its Portfolio Investments. However, while this might occur to a certain degree, the Advisor and Subadvisor believe that over time the value of Portfolio Investments will tend to move in the same direction as the market indices that are intended to correlate to the price movements of the Portfolio Investments that are the subject of the hedge. It is also possible that if a Portfolio were to hedge against the possibility of a decline in the market (adversely affecting the Portfolio Investments) and prices instead increased, the Portfolio would lose part or all of the benefit of increased value of those Portfolio Investments that it has hedged, because it would have offsetting losses in its futures positions. In addition, in such situations, if a Portfolio had insufficient cash, it might have to sell Portfolio Investments to meet daily variation margin requirements. Such sales of Portfolio Investments might be, but would not necessarily be, at increased prices (which would reflect the rising market). A Portfolio might have to sell Portfolio Investments at a time when it would be disadvantageous to do so.

In addition to the possibility that there might be an imperfect correlation, or no correlation at all, between price movements in the futures contracts and the Portfolio Investments being hedged, the price movements of futures contracts might not correlate perfectly with price movements in the Portfolio Investments due to certain market distortions. First, all participants in the futures market are subject to margin deposit and maintenance requirements. Rather than meeting additional margin deposit requirements, investors might close futures contracts through offsetting transactions which could distort the normal relationship between the Portfolio Investments and futures markets. Second, the margin requirements in the futures market are less onerous than margin requirements in the securities markets, and as a result the futures market might attract more speculators than the securities markets do. Increased participation by speculators in the futures market might also cause temporary price distortions. Due to the possibility of price distortion in the futures market and also because of the imperfect correlation between price movements in the Portfolio Investments and movements in the prices of futures contracts, even a correct forecast of general market trends by the Advisor or Subadvisor might not result in a successful hedging transaction over a short time period.

 

ADDITIONAL RISK DISCLOSURE

 

Recent Events in the Financial Markets

The global markets have continued to experience significant disruptions, including increased volatility, short-selling and overall loss of investor confidence.  These disruptions have impacted liquidity and volatility of securities generally, including securities in which the Portfolios may invest.  While certain recent economic indicators have shown modest improvements in the capital markets, these indicators could worsen.  During periods of extreme market volatility, prices of securities held by the Portfolios may be negatively impacted due to imbalances between market participants seeking to sell the same or similar securities and market participants willing or able to buy such securities.  As a result, the market prices of securities held by the Portfolios could go down, at times without regard to the financial condition of or specific events impacting the issuer of the security.

In light of current conditions in the U.S. and global financial markets and the U.S. and global economy, legislators, the presidential administration and regulators have increased their focus on the regulation of the financial services industry.  Federal, state, and other governments, their regulatory agencies, or self-regulatory organizations may take actions that affect the regulation of the instruments in which the Portfolios invest, or the issuers of such instruments, in ways that are unforeseeable.  Legislation or regulation may also change the way in which the Portfolios are regulated.  Such legislation or regulation could limit or preclude a Portfolio’s ability to achieve its investment objectives.

 

16

 


 

 

INVESTMENT RESTRICTIONS

 

Fundamental Investment Restrictions

Each Portfolio has adopted the following fundamental investment restrictions. These restrictions may not be changed without the approval of the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of the affected Portfolio as defined under the 1940 Act.

 

(1)           The Portfolio may not concentrate its investments in the securities of issuers primarily engaged in any particular industry or group of industries (other than securities issued or guaranteed by the U.S. Government or its agencies or instrumentalities and repurchase agreements secured thereby). This restriction shall not apply to investments in securities of other investment companies.

(2)           The Portfolio may not issue senior securities or borrow money, except from banks and through reverse repurchase agreements in an amount up to 33 1/3% of the value of the Portfolio’s total assets (including the amount borrowed).

(3)           The Portfolio may not underwrite the securities of other issuers, except to the extent that in connection with the disposition of portfolio securities, the Portfolio may be deemed to be an underwriter.

(4)           The Portfolio may not invest directly in commodities or real estate, although the Portfolio may invest in securities which are secured by real estate or real estate mortgages and securities of issuers which invest or deal in commodities, commodity futures, real estate, or real estate mortgages.

(5)           The Portfolio may not lend any security or make any loan, including engaging in repurchase agreements, if, as a result, more than 33 1/3% of the Portfolio’s total assets would be loaned to other parties, except through the purchase of debt securities or other debt instruments.

 

Under the interpretation of the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") staff, "concentrate" means to invest 25% or more of total assets in the securities of issuers primarily engaged in any one industry or group of industries.

 

Each Portfolio may invest up to 10% of its net assets in reverse repurchase agreements.

 

Under current law each Portfolio may underwrite securities only in compliance with the conditions of sections 10(f) and 12(c) of the 1940 Act and the rules thereunder wherein the Portfolio may underwrite securities to the extent that the Portfolio may be considered an underwriter within the meaning of the Securities Act in selling a portfolio security.

 

Nonfundamental Investment Restrictions

The Board has adopted the following nonfundamental investment restrictions for each Portfolio. A nonfundamental investment restriction can be changed by the Board at any time without a shareholder vote.

 

(1)           The Portfolio will, under normal circumstances, invest at least 80% of its assets, including borrowings for investment purposes, in exchange-traded funds (“ETFs”).

(2)           The Portfolio will not make any purchases of securities if borrowing exceeds 5% of total assets of the Portfolio.

(3)           The Portfolio may not purchase illiquid securities if more than 15% of the value of the Portfolio’s net assets would be invested in such securities. The Portfolio may buy and sell securities outside the U.S. that are not registered with the SEC or marketable in the U.S.

(4)           The Portfolio may not make short sales of securities or purchase any securities on margin except as provided with respect to options, futures contracts, and options on futures contracts.

(5)           With respect to Fundamental Investment Restriction (2) regarding borrowing, in order to secure any permitted borrowings and reverse repurchase agreements, the Portfolio may only pledge, mortgage or hypothecate assets up to 33 1/3% of the value of the Portfolio's total assets.

17

 


 

 

(6)           The Portfolio may not purchase or retain securities issued by companies for the purpose of exercising control.

 

Except for the liquidity and borrowing restrictions, any investment restriction which involves a maximum percentage of securities or assets shall not be considered to be violated unless an excess over the applicable percentage occurs immediately after an acquisition of securities or utilization of assets and results therefrom.

                 

DIVIDENDS, DISTRIBUTIONS, AND TAXES

 

Each Portfolio intends to qualify as a regulated investment company under Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”). If for any reason a Portfolio should fail to qualify, it would be taxed as a corporation at the Portfolio level, rather than passing through its income and gains to shareholders.

Any distributions of a Portfolio’s net investment income or realized net capital gains, if any, are normally paid once a year. However, the Portfolios do not intend to make distributions from realized net capital gains unless available capital loss carryforwards, if any, have been used or have expired. Utilization of these capital loss carryforwards may be subject to annual limitations under section 382 of the Code. 

Since the shareholders of the Portfolios are Insurance Companies, this SAI does not contain a discussion of the federal income tax consequences at the shareholder level. For information concerning the federal tax consequences to purchasers of annuity or life insurance policies, see the prospectus for the policies.

 

NET ASSET VALUE

 

Shares of each Portfolio are issued and redeemed at the NAV per share of the Portfolio. Each Portfolio’s NAV per share is determined by dividing that Portfolio’s total net assets (the value of its assets net of liabilities, including accrued expenses and fees) by the number of shares outstanding. Expenses are accrued daily, including the investment advisory fee. The NAVs of each Portfolio fluctuate based on the respective market value of the Portfolio’s investments. The NAV per share of each of the Portfolios is determined every business day as of the close of the regular session of the NYSE (generally 4:00 p.m. Eastern time). The Portfolios do not determine NAV on certain national holidays or other days on which the NYSE is closed: New Year’s Day, Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Day, Presidents’ Day, Good Friday, Memorial Day, Independence Day, Labor Day, Thanksgiving Day, and Christmas Day.

In calculating NAV, the Portfolio follows standard industry practice by recording security transactions and their valuations on the business day following the security transaction trade date. This practice is known as “trade date plus one” or “T + 1 accounting”. Thus, changes in holdings of portfolio securities are reflected in the first calculation of NAV on the first business day following trade date, as permitted by applicable law. Security transactions for money market instruments are recorded on trade date.

 

CALCULATION OF TOTAL RETURN

 

                The Portfolios may each advertise “total return.” Total return differs from yield in that yield figures measure only the income component of a Portfolio’s investments, while total return includes not only the effect of income dividends but also any change in NAV, or principal amount, during the stated period. Total return is computed by taking the total number of shares purchased by a hypothetical $1,000 investment, adding all additional shares purchased within the period with reinvested dividends and distributions, calculating the value of those shares at the end of the period, and dividing the result by the initial $1,000 investment. For periods of more than one year, the cumulative total return is then adjusted for the number of years, taking compounding into account, to calculate average annual total return during that period.

                 

18

 


 

 

Total return is computed according to the following formula:

 

P(1 + T)n = ERV

 

where P = a hypothetical initial payment of $1,000; T = average annual total return; n = number of years; and     ERV = the ending redeemable value of a hypothetical $1,000 payment made at the beginning of the 1, 5, or 10-year periods at the end of such periods (or portions thereof if applicable). Total return is historical in nature and is not intended to indicate future performance.

                Information on the annual returns and the long-term performance for each Portfolio is provided in the Portfolio’s Prospectus.

                Total return, like NAV per share, fluctuates in response to changes in market conditions. Total return for any particular time period should not be considered an indication of future return.

 

PURCHASE AND REDEMPTION OF SHARES

           

Purchases and redemption of Portfolio shares are effected only through the separate accounts of Insurance Companies.  The Portfolio will be deemed to have received a purchase or redemption order when the applicable Insurance Company receives the order in good order. The customer orders will be priced at the Portfolio’s NAV next computed after they are received by the Insurance Company.

                The Portfolios have no  arrangement with any person to permit frequent purchases and redemptions of Portfolio shares.

Each Portfolio has filed a notice of election with the SEC pursuant to Rule 18f-1 under the 1940 Act. The notice states that the Portfolio may honor redemptions that, during any 90-day period, exceed $250,000 or 1% of the NAV of the Portfolio, whichever is less, by redemptions-in-kind (distributions of a pro rata share of the portfolio securities, rather than cash). The notice of election is irrevocable while Rule 18f-1 is in effect unless the SEC permits the withdrawal of such notice.

                See the Prospectuses for additional details on purchases and redemptions.

                 

TRUSTEES AND OFFICERS

 

The Board of Directors supervises each Portfolio’s activities and reviews its contracts with companies that provide it with services. Business information about the Directors and Officers as well as information regarding the experience, qualifications, attributes and skills of the Directors is provided below. Independent Directors refers to those Directors who are not “interested persons” as that term is defined in the 1940 Act and the rules thereunder.

 

 

 

Position

 

Position

 

# of Calvert

Other

Directorships

Name &

with

Start

Principal Occupation

Portfolios

During

Age

Fund

Date

During Last 5 Years

Overseen

Last 5 Years

Independent Directors

FRANK H. BLATZ, JR., Esq.

AGE: 77

Director

2008

Of counsel to firm of Schiller & Pittenger, P.C.

18

None

ALICE GRESHAM BULLOCK

AGE: 62

 

Director

 

 

 

2008

Professor at Howard University School of Law. She is former Dean of Howard University School of Law and Deputy Director of the Association of American Law Schools.

20

None

M. CHARITO KRUVANT

AGE: 67

Director

2008

President and CEO of Creative Associates International, Inc., a firm that specializes in human resources development, information management, public affairs and private enterprise development.

30

·   Acacia Federal Savings Bank

·   Summit Foundation

·   WETA Public Broadcasting

CYNTHIA MILLIGAN

AGE: 66

 

 

 

 

 

Director

2008

Dean Emeritus (as of May 2009), College of Business Administration, University of Nebraska, Lincoln. She is the former President and Chief Executive Officer for CMA, a consulting firm for financial institutions.

 

20

·       Wells Fargo Company- NYSE

·       Gallup, Inc.

·       W.K. Kellogg Foundation

·       Raven Industries - NASDAQ

·       Colonial Williamsburg Foundation

·       Prison 

Fellowship Ministries Foundation

ARTHUR J. PUGH

AGE: 75

Director

2008

Retired executive.

 

18

·       Acacia Federal Savings Bank (through 2009)

19

 


 

 

 

Interested Directors

BARBARA J. KRUMSIEK*

AGE: 60

 

Director & Chairperson

2008

 

President, Chief Executive Officer and Chair of Calvert Investments, Inc.

 

46

·       Calvert Social Investment Foundation

·       Pepco Holdings, Inc.

·       Acacia Life Insurance Company (Chair) (through 4/29/12)

·       Griffin Realty Corp.

WILLIAM LESTER*

AGE: 55

Director

& President

2008

 

As of May 2009, Executive Vice President Finance/Investments and Corporate Treasurer of Ameritas Mutual Holding Company. Mr. Lester also continues to serve as President and Chair of Summit Investment Advisors, Inc.

18

·       Acacia Federal Savings Bank

·       Ameritas Investment Partners, Inc.

·       Ameritas Investment Corp.

 

20

 


 

 

 

Position

Position

Principal Occupation

During Last 5 Years

Name &

with

Start

Age

Fund

Date

Officers

MICHAEL T. ABRAMO

AGE: 39

Vice President

2011

Vice President of Calvert Investment Management, Inc. (the “Advisor”) (since 2011) and portfolio manager for Calvert’s taxable fixed-income funds.

KAREN BECKER

AGE: 60

Chief Compliance Officer

2008

Chief Compliance Officer for Calvert Funds.

SUSAN WALKER BENDER, Esq.

AGE: 54

Assistant Vice President & Assistant Secretary

2008

Assistant Vice President, Assistant Secretary and Associate General Counsel of Calvert Investments, Inc.

THOMAS A. DAILEY

AGE: 48

Vice President

2008

Vice President of the Advisor and lead portfolio manager for Calvert’s taxable and tax-exempt money market funds and municipal funds.

MATTHEW DUCH

AGE: 37

Vice President

2011

Vice President of the Advisor (since 2011) and portfolio manager for Calvert’s taxable fixed-income funds.

IVY WAFFORD DUKE, Esq. 

AGE: 44

Assistant Vice President & Assistant Secretary

2008

Assistant Vice President, Assistant Secretary and Deputy General Counsel of Calvert Investments, Inc., and Chief Compliance Officer for the Advisor and Calvert Investment Distributors, Inc.

PATRICK FAUL

AGE: 48

Vice President

2010

Vice President of the Advisor since 2008, and Head of Credit Research for the Advisor since 2009. Prior to 2009, Mr. Faul was Co-Head of Credit Research (2008) and a Senior Securities Analyst (prior to 2008) for the Advisor.

TRACI L. GOLDT

AGE: 39

Assistant Secretary

2008

Electronic Filing and Administrative Operations Manager (since 2011) and Executive Assistant to the General Counsel (prior to 2011), Calvert Investments, Inc.

HUI PING HO, CPA

Age: 48

Assistant Treasurer

2008

Assistant Treasurer and Tax Compliance Manager of Calvert Investments, Inc.

 

LANCELOT A. KING, Esq

AGE: 42

Assistant Vice President & Assistant Secretary

2008

Assistant Vice President, Assistant Secretary and Associate General Counsel of Calvert Investments, Inc.

 

AUGUSTO DIVO MACEDO, Esq.

AGE: 50

Assistant Vice President & Assistant Secretary

2008

Assistant Vice President, Assistant Secretary, and Assistant General Counsel Compliance of Calvert Investments, Inc.

JAMES R. McGLYNN, CFA

AGE: 53

 

Vice President

2009

Senior Vice President of the Advisor. Prior to joining Calvert in 2008, Mr. McGlynn was Managing Director, Equities, at Summit Investment Partners, Inc. and lead portfolio manager of Summit’s large cap value team.

ANDREW K. NIEBLER, Esq.

AGE: 45

Assistant Vice President & Assistant Secretary

2008

Assistant Vice President, Assistant Secretary and Associate General Counsel of Calvert Investments, Inc.

CATHERINE P. ROY

AGE: 57

Vice President

2008

Senior Vice President of the Advisor and Chief Investment Officer – Fixed Income.

william M. Tartikoff, Esq. 

AGE: 65

Vice President & Secretary

2008

Senior Vice President, Secretary, and General Counsel of Calvert Investments, Inc.

 

NATALIE A. TRUNOW

AGE: 45

Vice President

2008

Senior Vice President of the Advisor, and Chief Investment Officer – Equities. Prior to joining Calvert in August 2008, Ms. Trunow was the Section Head (2005-2008) and Portfolio Manager (2001-2008) for the Global Public Markets Group of General Motors Asset Management.

Ronald M. Wolfsheimer,  

CPA  

AGE: 60

 

Treasurer

2008

Executive Vice President and Chief Financial and Administrative Officer of Calvert Investments, Inc.

MICHAEL V. YUHAS JR., CPA   

AGE: 51

Fund Controller

2008

Vice President of Fund Administration of Calvert Investment Administrative Services, Inc.

 

         

21

 


 

 

*Ms. Krumsiek is an interested person of the Fund since she is an Officer and Director of the Fund’s Advisor and certain affiliates. Mr. Lester is an interested person of the Fund since he is an Officer of the parent company of the Fund’s Advisor.

 

The address of the Directors and Officers is 4550 Montgomery Avenue, Suite 1000N, Bethesda, Maryland 20814. As of March 31, 2013, the Directors and Officers of the Fund as a group own less than 1% of each Portfolio’s outstanding shares.

 

Additional Information about the Directors

The Board of Directors believes that each Director’s experience, qualifications, attributes or skills on an individual basis and in combination with those of the other Directors lead to the conclusion that the Directors possess the requisite experience, qualifications, attributes and skills to serve on the Board.  The Board of Directors believes that the Directors’ ability to review critically, evaluate, question and discuss information provided to them; to interact effectively with the Advisor, Subadvisors, other service providers, legal counsel and independent public accountants; and to exercise effective business judgment in the performance of their duties as Directors, support this conclusion.  The Board of Directors has also considered the contributions that each Director can make to the Board and the Portfolios.  In addition, the following specific experience, qualifications, attributes and/or skills apply as to each Director:  Mr. Blatz, legal experience; Ms. Gresham Bullock, academic leadership experience, legal experience and experience as a board member of various organizations; Ms. Kruvant, experience as a chief executive officer of a private company and experience as a board member of various organizations; Ms. Milligan, academic leadership experience, experience as a chief executive officer of a private company, and experience as a board member of various organizations; Mr. Pugh, experience as a business executive and experience as a board member of a bank; Ms. Krumsiek, leadership roles within the Advisor and certain of its affiliates and experience as a board member of various organizations; and Mr. Lester, experience as a chief executive officer of an investment management firm.  References to the experience, qualifications, attributes and/or skills of the Directors are pursuant to requirements of the SEC, do not constitute holding out of the Board or any Director as having special expertise or experience, and shall not impose any greater responsibility or liability on any such Director or on the Board by reason thereof.

22

 


 

 

 

Board Structure

The Board of Directors is responsible for overseeing the management and operations of the Fund and the Portfolios.  The Board consists of five Independent Directors and two Directors who are interested persons of the Fund.  Barbara J. Krumsiek, who is an interested person of the Fund, serves as Chairperson of the Board. 

The Board of Directors has two standing committees:  the Governance Committee and the Audit Committee.  Each of the Governance and Audit Committees is chaired by an Independent Director and composed of all of the Independent Directors.  Although the Board has not designated a lead independent director, the Chair of the Governance Committee acts as a liaison between Fund management and the Independent Directors.  In addition, the Chairs of the Governance Committee and Audit Committee work with Fund management in formulating agendas for Board and Committee meetings.  

Through the Governance and Audit Committees, the Independent Directors consider and address important matters involving the Portfolios, including those presenting conflicts or potential conflicts of interest for Fund management.  The Independent Directors also regularly meet outside the presence of Fund management and are advised by independent legal counsel.  The Board of Directors has determined that its committees help ensure that the Portfolios have effective and independent governance and oversight.  The Board of Directors has also determined that its leadership structure is appropriate given the Advisor’s sponsorship of the Portfolios, that investors have selected the Advisor to provide overall management to the Portfolios, and the Chairperson’s senior leadership role within the Advisor and an affiliated insurance company through which shares of the Portfolios may be offered.  The Board of Directors also believes its leadership structure facilitates the orderly and efficient flow of information to the Independent Directors from Fund management. 

The Governance Committee addresses matters of fund governance, including policies on Trustee compensation and on Board and Committee structure and responsibilities; the functions of the Governance Committee of the Board also include those of a Nominating Committee, e.g., handling initiation and consideration of nominations for the appointment or election of independent Trustees of the Board.  These matters were addressed in meetings held four times in the past fiscal year. The current members of this Committee are Mmes. Gresham Bullock, Milligan and Kruvant and Messrs. Blatz and Pugh, each an Independent Director.

The Audit Committee approves and recommends to the Board independent public accountants to conduct the annual audit of the Fund's financial statements; reviews with the independent public accountants the outline, scope, and results of the annual audit; and reviews the performance and fees charged by the independent public accountants for professional services.  In addition, the Audit Committee meets with the Fund's independent public accountants and representatives of Fund management to review accounting activities and areas of financial reporting and control.  It met five times in the past fiscal year. The current members of this Committee are Mmes. Gresham Bullock, Milligan and Kruvant and Messrs. Blatz and Pugh, each an Independent Director.

The Board of Directors of the Fund has retained Lipper Analytical Services, Inc. to provide the Board with an independent analysis of investment performance and expenses for each Portfolio, in connection with the Board’s annual consideration of the renewal of the Fund’s investment advisory, subadvisory, and underwriting agreements, as required by Section 15(c) of the 1940 Act.

 

Board Oversight of Risk

An integral part of the Board’s overall responsibility for overseeing the management and operations of the Portfolios is the Board’s oversight of the risk management of the Portfolios’ investment programs and business affairs.  The Portfolios are subject to a number of risks, such as investment risk, credit and counterparty risk, valuation risk, risk of operational failure or lack of business continuity, and legal, compliance and regulatory risk.  The Portfolios, the Advisor, the Subadvisors and other service providers to the Portfolios have implemented various processes, procedures and controls to identify risks to the Portfolios, to lessen the probability of their occurrence and to mitigate any adverse effect should they occur.  Different processes, procedures and controls are employed with respect to different types of risks.

The Board of Directors exercises oversight of the risk management process primarily through the Audit Committee, and through oversight by the Board itself.  In addition to adopting, and periodically reviewing, policies and procedures designed to address risks to the Portfolios, the Board of Directors requires management of the Advisor and the Fund, including the Fund’s Chief Compliance Officer (“CCO”), to report to the Board and the Committees of the Board on a variety of matters, including matters relating to risk management, at regular and special meetings.  The Board and the Audit Committee receive regular reports from the Fund’s independent public accountants on internal control and financial reporting matters.  On at least a quarterly basis, the Independent Directors meet with the Fund’s CCO, including outside the presence of management, to discuss issues related to compliance.  Furthermore, the Board receives a quarterly report from the Fund’s CCO regarding the operation of the compliance policies and procedures of the Fund and its primary service providers.  The Board also receives quarterly reports from the Advisor on the investments and securities trading of the Portfolios, including their investment performance and asset weightings compared to appropriate benchmarks, as well as reports regarding the valuation of the Portfolios’ securities.  The Board also receives reports from the Fund’s primary service providers, including the Subadvisors, regarding their operations as they relate to the Portfolios.

23

 


 

 

 

Directors’ Ownership of Portfolio Shares

The Directors owned shares in the Portfolios and in all other Calvert Funds for which they serve on the Board, in the following amounts as of December 31, 2012:

 

 

Dollar Range of Equity

Aggregate Dollar Range of Equity Securities

 

Securities in each

In All Registered Investment companies Overseen

Name of Director

Portfolio

By Directors in Calvert Family of Funds

 

 

 

Independent Directors

 

 

Frank H. Blatz Jr., Esq.

None

> $100,000

Alice Gresham Bullock

None

None

M. Charito Kruvant

None

> $100,000

Cynthia Milligan

None

> $100,000

Arthur J. Pugh

None

> $100,000

Interested Directors

 

 

Barbara J. Krumsiek

None

>$100,000

William Lester

None

$10,001-$50,000

 

Directors’ Compensation

 

Director Compensation Table

 

Calvert Variable Products, Inc.

 

The following table (unaudited numbers) sets forth information describing the compensation of each Director for his/her services to the Fund for each Portfolio’s most recent fiscal year ended December 31, 2012 and to all of the portfolios in the Fund Complex. Each Portfolio is responsible for a proportionate share of these payments incurred after it commences operations.

 

Name of Person, Position

Aggregate Compensation From Fund (Includes Pension or Retirement Benefits)

Pension or Retirement Benefits Accrued As Part of Fund Expenses

Total Compensation From Fund and Fund Complex Paid to Directors***

Frank H. Blatz, Jr., Esq.**

(Director)

$57,000

$28,500

$57,000

Alice Gresham Bullock

(Director)

$62,000

-

$97,000

M. Charito Kruvant**

(Director)

$57,000

-

$187,000

Cynthia Milligan**

(Director)

$57,000

-

$89,500

Arthur J. Pugh**

(Director)

$71,000

$17,750

$71,000

Barbara J. Krumsiek*

(Director & Chairperson)

-

-

-

William Lester*

(Director & President)

-

-

-

24

 


 

 

 

* Ms. Krumsiek is an interested person of the Fund since she is an Officer and Director of the Advisor and certain affiliates. Mr. Lester is an interested person of the Fund since he is a Director of the parent company of the Advisor.

 

** Mses. Kruvant and Milligan and Messrs. Blatz and Pugh have chosen to defer a portion of their compensation. As of December 31, 2012, total deferred compensation for service on all applicable Calvert Fund Boards, including dividends and capital appreciation, was $551,718; $308,046; $1,607,964; and $574,599, respectively.  

 

***As of December 31, 2012, the Fund Complex consisted of forty-four (44) funds.

 

Directors of each Portfolio not employed by the Fund’s Advisor or its affiliates may elect to defer receipt of all or a percentage of their fees and deem such deferred amounts to be invested in any fund in the Calvert Family of Funds through the Directors Deferred Compensation Plan. Management believes this will have a negligible effect on each Portfolio’s assets, liabilities, net assets, and net income per share.

 

INVESTMENT ADVISOR AND SUBADVISORS

 

                The Fund’s Investment Advisor is Calvert Investment Management, Inc. ("Calvert" or the "Advisor"), a subsidiary of Calvert Investments, Inc., which is a subsidiary of Ameritas Mutual Holding Company. Under the Investment Advisory Agreement with respect to the Portfolios, the Advisor provides investment advice to the Portfolios and oversees the day-to-day operations, subject to the supervision and direction of the Board of Directors. The Advisor provides the Portfolios with investment supervision and management, and office space; furnishes executive and other personnel to the Portfolios; and pays the salaries and fees of all Directors who are employees of the Advisor or its affiliates. The Portfolios pay all other administrative and operating expenses, including: custodial, registrar, dividend disbursing and transfer agency fees; administrative fees; fund accounting fees; federal and state securities registration fees; salaries, fees and expenses of Directors, executive officers and employees of the Fund, who are not employees of the Advisor or of its affiliates; insurance premiums; trade association dues; legal and audit fees; interest, taxes and other business fees; expenses of printing and mailing reports, notices, prospectuses, and proxy materials to shareholders; shareholder meeting expenses; and brokerage commissions and other costs associated with the purchase and sale of portfolio securities. As explained in the Prospectus under “More Information on Fees and Expense”, the Portfolios have an expense offset arrangement with the custodian bank whereby the custodian fees may be paid indirectly by credits on the Portfolios’ uninvested cash balances. These credits are used to reduce Portfolio expenses. In those Portfolios where the total annual fund operating expenses are subject to a contractual expense limitation, the Advisor could be deemed to have an incentive to leave greater cash balances at the custodian, since it receives the benefit of any expense offset credit. The Board of Directors periodically reviews and evaluates the expense offset arrangement.

25

 


 

 

Under the Investment Advisory Agreement, the Advisor receives an annual fee, payable monthly, of 0.42% of Calvert VP Volatility Managed Moderate Portfolio’s average daily net assets; 0.42% of Calvert VP Volatility Managed Moderate Growth Portfolio’s average daily net assets; and, 0.42% of Calvert VP Volatility Managed Growth Portfolio’s average daily net assets.

The Advisor reserves the right to (i) waive all or a part of its fee; (ii) reimburse a Portfolio for expenses; and (iii) pay broker/dealers in consideration of their promotional or administrative services. The Advisor may, but is not required to, waive current payment of its fees or reimburse expenses of the Portfolio, except as noted in the Portfolio’s Prospectus.

Because the Portfolios have not yet commenced operations, no Investment Advisory fees have yet been paid to the Advisor.

 

Subadvisors

Ameritas Investment Partners, Inc. (“AIP”), 390 Cotner Blvd., Lincoln, NE 68505, is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Ameritas Holding Company, which is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Ameritas Mutual Holding Company. AIP serves as subadvisor for the Calvert VP Volatility Managed Moderate Portfolio Calvert VP Volatility Managed Moderate Growth Portfolio, and the Calvert VP Volatility Managed Growth Portfolio  For each Portfolio, AIP receives a subadvisory fee determined after all other expenses of the Portfolio have been paid and payable monthly by the Advisor.

Milliman Financial Risk Management, LLC (“Milliman”), 71 S. Wacker Dr., 31st Floor, Chicago, IL 60606, is the investment subadvisor for the Calvert VP Volatility Managed Moderate Portfolio Calvert VP Volatility Managed Moderate Growth Portfolio, and the Calvert VP Volatility Managed Growth Portfolio.  The Advisor will pay Milliman a monthly fee computed on a daily basis, at an annual rate, equal to: 0.20% of the Portfolio’s daily net assets.

The Advisor and the Fund have received an exemptive order to permit it and the Advisor to enter into and materially amend the respective Investment Subadvisory Agreement (entered into with any subadvisor that is not an “affiliated person,” as defined in Section 2(a)(3) of the 1940 Act) without shareholder approval.* Within 90 days of the hiring of any Subadvisor or the implementation of any material change in an Investment Subadvisory Agreement with an unaffiliated Subadvisor, the affected Portfolio will furnish its shareholders information about the new Subadvisor or Investment Subadvisory Agreement that would be included in a proxy statement. Such information will include any change in such disclosure caused by the addition of a new Subadvisor or any material change to the Investment Subadvisory Agreement of the Fund. The Fund will meet this condition by providing shareholders, within 90 days of the hiring of the Subadvisor or implementation of any material change to the terms of an Investment Subadvisory Agreement, with an information statement to this effect.

 

* For purposes of this discussion, AIP is considered to be an “affiliated person."

 

PORTFOLIO MANAGER DISCLOSURE

 

Additional information about each Portfolio’s portfolio manager, identified in the Prospectus of the Portfolio, is provided below. 

 

A.            Other Accounts Managed by Portfolio Manager of the Portfolios

 

The following portfolio managers of the Portfolios are also primarily responsible for day-to-day management of the portfolios of the other accounts indicated below.  This information includes accounts managed by any group that includes the identified portfolio manager.  The "Other Accounts" category includes accounts managed in the portfolio manager’s personal as well as professional capacities.

 

26

 


 

Calvert VP Volatility Managed Moderate Portfolio

AIP
Gary R. Rodmaker, CFA

Accounts Managed other than Calvert VP Volatility Managed Moderate Portfolio as of December 31, 2012

Registered Investment Companies

Other Pooled Investment Vehicles

Other Accounts

Number of Other Accounts Managed

7

0

8

Total Assets in Other Accounts Managed

$1,010,295,378

0

$3,094,363,945

Number of Other Accounts in which Advisory Fee is Based on Account’s Performance

0

0

0

Total Assets in Other Accounts in which Advisory Fee is Based on Account’s Performance

0

0

0

 

Kevin L. Keene, CFA

 

Accounts Managed other than Calvert VP Volatility Managed Moderate Portfolio as of December 31, 2012

Registered Investment Companies

Other Pooled Investment Vehicles

Other Accounts

Number of Other Accounts Managed

4

0

2

Total Assets in Other Accounts Managed

$658,635,953

0

$1,422,600,424

Number of Other Accounts in which Advisory Fee is Based on Account’s Performance

0

0

0

Total Assets in Other Accounts in which Advisory Fee is Based on Account’s Performance

0

0

0

 

Milliman

Adam Schenck, CFA, FRM

 

Accounts Managed other than Calvert VP Volatility Managed Moderate Portfolio as of December 31, 2012

Registered Investment Companies

Other Pooled Investment Vehicles

Other Accounts

Number of Other Accounts Managed

4

2

5

Total Assets in Other Accounts Managed

$10,200,000,000

$2,600,000

$1,300,000,000

Number of Other Accounts in which Advisory Fee is Based on Account’s Performance

N/A

N/A

N/A

Total Assets in Other Accounts in which Advisory Fee is Based on Account’s Performance

N/A

N/A

N/A

  

Blake Graves, FRM

 

Accounts Managed other than Calvert VP Volatility Managed Moderate Portfolio as of December 31, 2012

Registered Investment Companies

Other Pooled Investment Vehicles

Other Accounts

Number of Other Accounts Managed

1

0

0

Total Assets in Other Accounts Managed

$17,700,000

0

0

Number of Other Accounts in which Advisory Fee is Based on Account’s Performance

N/A

N/A

N/A

Total Assets in Other Accounts in which Advisory Fee is Based on Account’s Performance

N/A

N/A

N/A

27

 


 

 

 

Calvert VP Volatility Managed Moderate Growth Portfolio

 

AIP

Gary R. Rodmaker, CFA

 

Accounts Managed other than Calvert VP Volatility Managed Moderate Growth Portfolio as of December 31, 2012

Registered Investment Companies

Other Pooled Investment Vehicles

Other Accounts

Number of Other Accounts Managed

7

0

8

Total Assets in Other Accounts Managed

$1,010,295,378

0

$3,094,363,945

Number of Other Accounts in which Advisory Fee is Based on Account’s Performance

0

0

0

Total Assets in Other Accounts in which Advisory Fee is Based on Account’s Performance

0

0

0

 

Kevin L. Keene, CFA

 

Accounts Managed other than Calvert VP Volatility Managed Moderate Growth Portfolio as of December 31, 2012

Registered Investment Companies

Other Pooled Investment Vehicles

Other Accounts

Number of Other Accounts Managed

4

0

2

Total Assets in Other Accounts Managed

$658,635,953

0

$1,422,600,424

Number of Other Accounts in which Advisory Fee is Based on Account’s Performance

0

0

0

Total Assets in Other Accounts in which Advisory Fee is Based on Account’s Performance

0

0

0

 

Milliman

Adam Schenck, CFA, FRM

 

Accounts Managed other than Calvert VP Volatility Managed Moderate Growth Portfolio as of December 31, 2012

Registered Investment Companies

Other Pooled Investment Vehicles

Other Accounts

Number of Other Accounts Managed

4

2

5

Total Assets in Other Accounts Managed

$10,200,000,000

$2,600,000

$1,300,000,000

Number of Other Accounts in which Advisory Fee is Based on Account’s Performance

N/A

N/A

N/A

Total Assets in Other Accounts in which Advisory Fee is Based on Account’s Performance

N/A

N/A

N/A

 

 

28

 


 
Blake Graves, FRM

 

Accounts Managed other than Calvert VP Volatility Managed Moderate Growth Portfolio as of December 31, 2012

Registered Investment Companies

Other Pooled Investment Vehicles

Other Accounts

Number of Other Accounts Managed

1

0

0

Total Assets in Other Accounts Managed

$17,700,000

0

0

Number of Other Accounts in which Advisory Fee is Based on Account’s Performance

N/A

N/A

N/A

Total Assets in Other Accounts in which Advisory Fee is Based on Account’s Performance

N/A

N/A

N/A

 

Calvert VP Volatility Managed Growth Portfolio

 

AIP

Gary R. Rodmaker, CFA

 

Accounts Managed other than Calvert VP Volatility Managed Growth Portfolio as of December 31, 2012

Registered Investment Companies

Other Pooled Investment Vehicles

Other Accounts

Number of Other Accounts Managed

7

0

8

Total Assets in Other Accounts Managed

$1,010,295,378

0

$3,094,363,945

Number of Other Accounts in which Advisory Fee is Based on Account’s Performance

0

0

0

Total Assets in Other Accounts in which Advisory Fee is Based on Account’s Performance

0

0

0

 

Kevin L. Keene, CFA

 

Accounts Managed other than Calvert VP Volatility Managed Growth Portfolio as of December 31, 2012

Registered Investment Companies

Other Pooled Investment Vehicles

Other Accounts

Number of Other Accounts Managed

4

0

2

Total Assets in Other Accounts Managed

$658,635,953

0

$1,422,600,424

Number of Other Accounts in which Advisory Fee is Based on Account’s Performance

0

0

0

Total Assets in Other Accounts in which Advisory Fee is Based on Account’s Performance

0

0

0

 

Milliman

Adam Schenck, CFA, FRM

 

Accounts Managed other than Calvert VP Volatility Managed Growth Portfolio as of December 31, 2012

Registered Investment Companies

Other Pooled Investment Vehicles

Other Accounts

Number of Other Accounts Managed

4

2

5

Total Assets in Other Accounts Managed

$10,200,000,000

$2,600,000

$1,300,000,000

Number of Other Accounts in which Advisory Fee is Based on Account’s Performance

N/A

N/A

N/A

Total Assets in Other Accounts in which Advisory Fee is Based on Account’s Performance

N/A

N/A

N/A

29

 


 

 

Blake Graves, FRM

 

Accounts Managed other than Calvert VP Volatility Managed Growth Portfolio as of December 31, 2012

Registered Investment Companies

Other Pooled Investment Vehicles

Other Accounts

Number of Other Accounts Managed

1

0

0

Total Assets in Other Accounts Managed

$17,700,000

0

0

Number of Other Accounts in which Advisory Fee is Based on Account’s Performance

N/A

N/A

N/A

Total Assets in Other Accounts in which Advisory Fee is Based on Account’s Performance

N/A

N/A

N/A

 

B.            Potential Conflicts of Interest in Managing the Portfolios and Other Accounts

 

The following describes material conflicts of interest, which may potentially arise in connection with the management of a Portfolio’s investments by a portfolio manager and that individual’s simultaneous management of the investments of any other accounts listed in this SAI.  See “Other Accounts Managed by Portfolio Managers of the Portfolios” above.

 

Calvert VP Volatility Managed moderate Portfolio, Calvert VP Volatility Managed moderate growth Portfolio, and Calvert VP Volatility Managed growth Portfolio

 

AIP:

From time to time, potential conflicts of interest may arise between a portfolio manager’s management of the investments of the Portfolio on one hand, and the management of other registered investment companies and other accounts (collectively, “other accounts”) on the other. The other accounts might have similar investment objectives or strategies as the Portfolio, track the same indexes the Portfolio tracks or otherwise hold, purchase or sell securities that are eligible to be held, purchased or sold by the Portfolio. The other accounts might also have different investment objectives or strategies than the Portfolio.

A potential conflict of interest may arise as a result of the portfolio manager’s day-to-day management of the Portfolio. Because of their positions with the Portfolio, the portfolio managers know the size, timing and possible market impact of the Portfolio’s trades. It is theoretically possible that the portfolio manager could use this information to the advantage of other accounts they manage and to the possible detriment of the Portfolio.

A potential conflict of interest may arise as a result of the portfolio manager’s management of a number of accounts with varying guidelines. Often, an investment opportunity may be suitable for both the Portfolio and other accounts managed by the portfolio manager, but may not be available in sufficient quantities for both the Portfolio and other accounts to participate fully. Similarly, there may be limited opportunity to sell an investment held by the Portfolio and another account. AIP has adopted policies and procedures reasonably designed to allocate investment opportunities on a fair and equitable basis over time. 

 

Milliman:

Milliman has not identified any material conflicts between the Portfolios and other accounts managed by Milliman and its portfolio managers. However, actual or apparent conflicts of interest may arise in connection with the day-to-day management of the Portfolios and other accounts because the portfolio managers manage other accounts. The management of the Portfolios and other accounts may result in unequal time and attention being devoted to the Portfolios and other accounts. Another potential conflict of interest may arise where another account has the same investment objective as the Portfolios, whereby the portfolio managers could favor one account over another. Further, a potential conflict could include the portfolio managers' knowledge about the size, timing and possible market impact of Portfolios’ trades, whereby they could use this information to the advantage of other accounts and to the disadvantage of the Portfolios. These potential conflicts of interest could create the appearance that the portfolio managers are favoring one investment vehicle over another.

30

 


 

 

 

C.                  Compensation of Portfolio Manager of the Portfolios

 

Set forth below are the structure of and method used to determine (1) the cash and non-cash compensation received by each portfolio manager from a Portfolio, the Advisor and/or Subadvisor of the Portfolio, or any other sources with respect to management of the Portfolio, and (2) the cash and non-cash compensation received by the portfolio manager from any other accounts listed in this SAI. See “Other Accounts Managed by Portfolio Managers of the Portfolios” above.

 

AIP:

 

Compensation with Respect to Management of the Calvert VP Volatility Managed Moderate Portfolio, Calvert VP Volatility Managed Moderate Growth Portfolio, and Calvert VP Volatility Managed Growth Portfolio and Other Accounts as of December 31, 2012

Type of Compensation Received

Source of Compensation

Criteria on which Compensation is Based

Salary

AIP

The base salary is a fixed amount based on industry market compensation surveys.

Bonus

AIP

The annual bonus is calculated as a percentage of base salary and on various criteria, including annual profitability compared to its budget, assets under management, personal performance criteria and specific performance measures (such as pre-tax total return, peer rankings, etc.) calculated on a dollar-weighted average basis among accounts with the same investment objectives.

Deferred Compensation

AIP

Managing Directors and above (including Gary Rodmaker) may defer a portion of their compensation over an agreed upon term. Such deferral may be directed among various investment options, including those with the returns associated with certain Calvert Funds.

Other Compensation or Benefits Not Generally Available to All Salaried Employees

AIP

A long-term incentive compensation plan based on performance criteria established from time to time by the Ameritas Mutual Holding Company Board of Directors for eligible employees (including Gary Rodmaker).

 

Milliman:

 

Compensation with Respect to Management of the Calvert VP Volatility Managed Moderate Portfolio, Calvert VP Volatility Managed Moderate Growth Portfolio, and Calvert VP Volatility Managed Growth Portfolio and Other Accounts as of December 31, 2012

Type of Compensation Received

Source of Compensation

Criteria on which Compensation is Based

Salary

Milliman

The Portfolio Managers’ compensation is a fixed salary that is set by reference to industry standards.

Bonus

Milliman

Bonuses paid to the Portfolio Managers are based on the profitability of the Advisor.

 

Deferred Compensation

Milliman

None.

Other Compensation or Benefits Not Generally Available to All Salaried Employees

Milliman

None.

31

 


 

 

 

D.            Securities Ownership of the Portfolio Manager of the Portfolios

 

With respect to each Portfolio Manager identified in the applicable Prospectus, the following information sets forth the Portfolio Manager’s beneficial ownership of securities as of December 31, 2012 in the Portfolio managed by that individual. The securities were valued as of December 31, 2012. (Specified ranges: None; $1 to $10,000; $10,001 to $50,000; $50,001 to $100,000; $100,001 to $500,000; $500,001 to $1,000,000; or over $1,000,000.)

 

Portfolio

Firm

Name of Portfolio Manager

Fund Ownership

Calvert VP Volatility Managed Moderate Portfolio

AIP

Gary R. Rodmaker, CFA

None

 

AIP

Kevin L. Keene, CFA

None

 

Milliman

Adam Schenck, CFA, FRM

None

 

Milliman

Blake Graves, FRM

None

 

 

 

 

Calvert VP Volatility Managed Moderate Growth Portfolio

AIP

Gary R. Rodmaker, CFA

None

 

AIP

Kevin L. Keene, CFA

None

 

Milliman

Adam Schenck, CFA, FRM

None

 

Milliman

Blake Graves, FRM

None

 

 

 

 

Calvert VP Volatility Managed Growth Portfolio

AIP

Gary R. Rodmaker, CFA

None

 

AIP

Kevin L. Keene, CFA

None

 

Milliman

Adam Schenck, CFA, FRM

None

 

Milliman

Blake Graves, FRM

None

 

ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES AGENT

 

                Calvert Investment Administrative Services, Inc. (“CIAS”), an affiliate of the Advisor, has been retained by the Fund to provide certain administrative services necessary to the conduct of the Portfolios’ affairs, including the preparation of regulatory filings and shareholder reports. For providing such services, CIAS receives an annual administrative fee payable monthly equal to 0.10% of each Portfolio’s average daily net assets.

                Because the Portfolios have not yet commenced operations, no fees have been paid to CIAS.

 

METHOD OF DISTRIBUTION

 

Calvert Investment Distributors, Inc. (“CID”) is the principal underwriter and distributor for the Fund. CID is an affiliate of the Advisor. Under the terms of its underwriting agreement with the Fund, CID markets and distributes the Portfolios' shares and is responsible for preparing advertising and sales literature, and printing and mailing prospectuses to prospective investors.

Pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under the 1940 Act, the Fund has adopted a Distribution Plan (the "Plan"), which permits the Fund to pay certain expenses associated with the distribution and servicing of shares. Such expenses for Class F shares may not exceed, on an annual basis, 0.25% of each Portfolio’s Class F average daily net assets.    Class I shares and single-class shares have no Plan. Plan expenses may be spent for advertising, printing and mailing of prospectuses to persons who are not already Portfolio shareholders, compensation to broker/dealers, underwriters, and salespersons.

32

 


 

 

                The Fund's Plan was approved by the Board of Directors, including the Directors who are not "interested persons" of the Fund (as that term is defined in the 1940 Act) and who have no direct or indirect financial interest in the operation of the Plan or in any agreements related to the Plans. The selection and nomination of the Directors who are not interested persons of the Fund is committed to the discretion of such Independent Directors. In establishing the Plan, the Directors considered various factors, including the anticipated amount of the distribution expenses. The Directors determined that there is a reasonable likelihood that the Plan will benefit the Portfolios and their shareholders, including economies of scale that may be realized at higher asset levels, better investment opportunities and more flexibility in managing a growing portfolio.

                The Plan may be terminated by vote of a majority of the Independent Directors who have no direct or indirect financial interest in the Plan, or by vote of a majority of the outstanding shares of the affected class of each Portfolio. Any change in the Plan that would materially increase the distribution cost to a Portfolio requires approval of the shareholders of the affected class; otherwise, the Plan may be amended by the Directors, including a majority of the Independent Directors as described above. The Plan will continue in effect for successive one-year terms provided that such continuance is specifically approved by: (i) the vote of a majority of the Directors who are not parties to the Plan or interested persons of any such party and who have no direct or indirect financial interest in the Plan, and (ii) the vote of a majority of the entire Board of Directors.

                Distribution and shareholding servicing expenses are paid to broker/dealers through sales charges (paid by the investor) and 12b-1 Plan expenses (paid by the Fund as part of the annual operating expenses). CID is responsible for paying (i) all commissions or other fees to its associated persons which are due for the sale of the Portfolio shares, and (ii) any compensation to other broker-dealers and their associated persons due under the terms of any sales agreement between CID and the broker-dealers. The Advisor, CID and/or their affiliates, at their own expense, may incur costs and pay expenses associated with the distribution of shares of the Portfolios. The Advisor, CID and/or their affiliates have agreed to pay certain firms compensation based on sales of Portfolio shares or on assets held in those firms' accounts for their marketing, distribution, and shareholder servicing of Portfolio shares, above the usual sales charges, distribution and service fees.  In other instances, one of these entities may make annual payments to a broker/dealer in order to be included in a wrap or preferred provider program.  This list may be changed from time to time. As of December 31, 2012, the Advisor, CID and/or their affiliates had special arrangements regarding one or more Calvert Funds with the following firms: Ameriprise Financial Services, Ameritas Life Insurance Corp., Charles Schwab & Co., Inc., CUSO, Fidelity, First Ameritas Life Insurance Corp., J.P. Morgan, LPL Financial Services, BMO Harris Bank, Merrill Lynch, Morgan Stanley, National Financial Services, LLC, Pershing, Raymond James, SunGard Institutional Brokerage Inc., Thrivent Financial for Lutherans, UBS Financial Services, Union Central Life Insurance Company and Wells Fargo Advisors.  Where payments are being made to a broker/dealer to encourage sales of Portfolio shares, the broker/dealer has an incentive to recommend Portfolio shares to its customers. Neither the Advisor nor any Subadvisor uses Portfolio brokerage to compensate broker/dealers for the sale of Portfolio shares.

                The Fund has entered into an agreement with CID as principal underwriter. CID makes a continuous offering of the Portfolios' securities on a "best efforts" basis. Under the terms of the agreement, CID is entitled to receive a distribution fee and a service fee from the Portfolios based on the average daily net assets of each Portfolio's respective classes. These fees are paid pursuant to the Portfolios' Plans.

 

TRANSFER AND SHAREHOLDER SERVICING AGENTS

 

Boston Financial Data Services, Inc. ("BFDS"), a subsidiary of State Street Bank & Trust Company, N. A., has been retained by the Fund to act as transfer agent and dividend disbursing agent. These responsibilities include: responding to certain shareholder inquiries and instructions, crediting and debiting shareholder accounts for purchases and redemptions of Portfolio shares and confirming such transactions, and daily updating of shareholder accounts to reflect declaration and payment of dividends.

                Calvert Investment Services, Inc. (“CIS”), a subsidiary of the Advisor, has been retained by the Fund to act as shareholder servicing agent. Shareholder servicing responsibilities include responding to shareholder inquiries and instructions concerning their accounts, entering any telephoned purchases or redemptions into the BFDS system, maintenance of broker/dealer data, and preparing and distributing statements to shareholders regarding their accounts.

                For these services, BFDS receives a fee based on the number of shareholder accounts and shareholder transactions, while CIS receives a fee based on the asset class (money market, fixed income and equities) and the resources necessary to support the various services each asset class requires. CIS may contract with subagents, at the Fund’s expense, to provide recordkeeping and sub-accounting services to the Portfolios.

33

 


 

 

 

PORTFOLIO TRANSACTIONS

                 

The Portfolio’s Advisor and Subadvisors place orders with broker-dealers for the Portfolios’ portfolio transactions. Purchases and sales of equity securities on a securities exchange or an over-the-counter market are effected through broker-dealers who receive commissions for their services. Generally, commissions relating to securities traded on foreign exchanges will be higher than commissions relating to securities traded on U.S. exchanges and may not be subject to negotiation. Equity securities may also be purchased from underwriters at prices that include underwriting fees. In underwritten offerings, securities are purchased at a fixed price, which includes an amount of compensation to the underwriter, generally referred to as the underwriter's concession or discount. Fixed income securities are generally traded at a net price with dealers acting as principal for their own accounts without a stated commission. The price of the security usually includes profit to the dealers. Prices for fixed-income securities in secondary trades usually include undisclosed compensation to the market-maker reflecting the spread between the bid and ask prices for the securities.

Portfolio transactions are undertaken on the basis of their desirability from an investment standpoint. The Portfolios' Advisor and Subadvisors make investment decisions and select brokers and dealers under the direction and supervision of the Board of Directors.

Broker/dealers who execute portfolio transactions on behalf of the Portfolios are selected on the basis of their execution capability and trading expertise considering, among other factors, the overall reasonableness of the brokerage commissions, current market conditions, size and timing of the order, difficulty of execution, per share price, market familiarity, reliability, integrity, and financial condition, subject to the Advisor's or Subadvisor's obligation to seek best execution. The Portfolios have adopted a policy that prohibits the Advisor and the Subadvisors from using Portfolio brokerage to compensate broker/dealers for promotion or sale of Portfolio shares.  Because they had not yet commenced operations, none of the Portfolios paid brokerage commissions in the last three fiscal years.

The Portfolios' Advisor and Subadvisors select brokers on the basis of best execution. In some cases they select brokers that provide research and research-related services to them. These research services include advice, either directly or through publications or writings, as to the value of securities, the advisability of investing in, purchasing or selling securities, and the availability of securities or purchasers or sellers of securities; furnishing of analyses and reports concerning issuers, securities or industries; providing information on economic factors and trends; assisting in determining portfolio strategy; providing computer software used in security analyses; providing portfolio performance evaluation and technical market analyses; and providing other services relevant to the investment decision making process. Other such services are designed primarily to assist the Advisor in monitoring the investment activities of the Subadvisors of the Portfolios. Such services include portfolio attribution systems, return-based style analysis, and trade-execution analysis.

If, in the judgment of the Advisor or Subadvisor, the Portfolios or other accounts managed by them will be benefited by supplemental research services, they are authorized to pay brokerage commissions to a broker furnishing such services which are in excess of commissions which another broker may have charged for effecting the same transaction. It is the policy of the Advisor that such research services will be used for the benefit of the Portfolios as well as other Calvert funds and managed accounts.  Because the Portfolios have not yet commenced operations, the Advisor has not received soft-dollar credits for brokerage transactions for any of the Portfolios.  In addition, because the Portfolios have not yet commenced operations, the Portfolios held no securities of their "regular broker-dealers" (as defined in the 1940 Act) or of the parents of those broker-dealers as of December 31, 2012.

 

PORTFOLIO HOLDINGS DISCLOSURE

 

The Portfolios have adopted a Portfolio Holdings Disclosure Policy (“Disclosure Policy”) that is designed to prevent the inappropriate disclosure of or the misuse of non-public information regarding a Portfolio’s portfolio holdings.

 

34

 


 

Publicly Available Portfolio Holdings

                 Information regarding a Portfolio’s portfolio holdings is publicly available: (1) at the time such information is filed with the Commission in a publicly available filing; or (2) the day next following the day when such information is posted on www.calvert.com/institutional-VP-FundHoldings.html. This information may be a Portfolio’s complete portfolio holdings, such as those disclosed in its Semi-Annual or Annual Reports and filed with the Commission on Form N-CSR, or in its quarterly holding reports filed with the SEC on Form N-Q after the Portfolio’s first and third quarters. From time to time, a Portfolio may disclose on www.calvert.com  whether it holds a particular security, in response to media inquiries. A Portfolio’s publicly available portfolio holdings may be provided to third parties without prior approval under the Disclosure Policy.

 

Non-Public Portfolio Holdings

The Portfolios’ Disclosure Policy, as described generally below, allows the disclosure of a Portfolio’s non-public portfolio holdings for the Portfolio’s legitimate business purposes, subject to certain conditions, to: (1) rating and ranking organizations; (2) certain service providers; and (3) certain other recipients. Non-public portfolio holdings may not be disclosed to members of the media under any circumstance.

Subject to approval from the Legal Department of Calvert Investments, Inc., a representative from the Administrator may provide a Portfolio’s non-public portfolio holdings to a recognized rating and ranking organization, without limitation on the condition that the non-public portfolio holdings will be used solely for the purposes of developing a rating and subject to a written agreement requiring confidentiality and prohibiting the use of the information for trading.

A service provider or other third party that receives information about a Portfolio’s non-public portfolio holdings where necessary to enable the provider to perform its contractual services for the Portfolio (e.g.,  a person that performs account maintenance and record keeping services) may receive non-public portfolio holdings without limitation on the condition that the non-public portfolio holdings will be used solely for the purpose of servicing the Portfolio and subject to a written agreement requiring confidentiality and prohibiting the use of the information for trading.

A Portfolio’s partial or complete portfolio holdings may be disclosed to certain other recipients, current and prospective shareholders of the Portfolios and current and prospective clients of the Advisor, provided that: (1) the recipient makes a specific request to the General Counsel of Calvert Investments, Inc. (or his designee) (“Authorized Individual”); (2) the Authorized Individual determines that the Portfolio has a legitimate business purpose for disclosing non-public portfolio holdings information to the recipient; (3) the Authorized Individual (if other than the General Counsel) obtains prior approval from the Legal Department; and (4) the recipient signs a confidentiality agreement that provides that the non-public portfolio holdings will be kept confidential, may not be used to trade, and may not be disseminated or used for any purpose other than the purpose approved by the Authorized Individual. The Disclosure Policy further provides that, in approving a request, the Authorized Individual considers the recipient’s need for the relevant holdings information, whether the disclosure will benefit the Portfolio, or, at a minimum, not harm the Portfolio, and what conflicts may result from such disclosures.

Under the Disclosure Policy, neither a Portfolio, the Advisor, nor any other party is permitted to receive compensation or other consideration from or on behalf of the recipient in connection with disclosure to the recipient of the Portfolio’s non-public portfolio holdings. The Disclosure Policy is subject to annual review by the Fund’s Board of Directors. The Board of Directors shall also receive annual reports from Fund management on those entities to whom such disclosure has been made.

 

Ongoing Arrangements

The following is a list of those entities to whom information about the Portfolios’ portfolio securities is made available and the frequency (following a 15-day lag), including the identity of the persons who receive information pursuant to such arrangements. In all such cases, disclosure is made subject to a written confidentiality agreement, which includes provisions preventing use of the information to trade.

 

 

Name of Entity

 

Information Provided

 

Frequency Provided

Aris Corporation

Portfolio Holdings

Quarterly

Asset Consulting Group

Portfolio Holdings

Quarterly

Asset Strategy Consultants

Portfolio Holdings

Quarterly

Bank of Oklahoma Trust Company

Portfolio Holdings

Quarterly

Baybridge Consulting

Portfolio Holdings

Quarterly

Bidart & Ross

Portfolio Holdings

Quarterly

Bloomberg

Portfolio Holdings

Monthly

Blue Prairie Group

Portfolio Holdings

Quarterly

Callan Associates

Portfolio Characteristics, Top Holdings

Quarterly

Cambridge Associates

Portfolio Holdings

Quarterly

Cammack Larhette Consulting/

Cammack Larhette Securites

Portfolio Holdings

Quarterly

Capital Market Consultants, LLC

Portfolio Holdings

Quarterly

Care Group

Portfolio Holdings

Quarterly

Citigroup Consulting

Portfolio Holdings

Quarterly

Colonial Consulting

Portfolio Holdings

Quarterly

Consulting Services Group

Portfolio Holdings

Quarterly

Cook Street Consulting

Portfolio Holdings

Quarterly

Dahab Consulting

Portfolio Holdings

Quarterly

DiMeo Schneider & Associates, L.L.C.

Portfolio Holdings

Quarterly

Evaluation Associates

Portfolio Holdings

Quarterly

FactSet

Portfolio Holdings

Monthly

Fulton Financial/Claremont Investments

Portfolio Holdings

Quarterly

Fund Evaluation Group

Portfolio Holdings

Quarterly

Hartland & Co.

Portfolio Holdings

Quarterly

HC Asset Management

Portfolio Holdings

Quarterly

Hewitt Ennisknupp

Portfolio Holdings

Quarterly

Innovest Portfolio Solutions

Portfolio Holdings

Quarterly

Institutional Consulting Group

Portfolio Holdings

Quarterly

Institutional Shareholder Services

Portfolio Holdings

Quarterly

Investment Company Institute

Portfolio Holdings (Money Market Funds only)

Quarterly

KPMG

Portfolio Holdings

Annually

LCG Associates

Portfolio Holdings

Quarterly

Mass Mutual

Mees Pierson

Portfolio Holdings

Portfolio Holdings, Portfolio Characteristics, Asset Allocation

Quarterly

Quarterly

Mennonite Foundation

Portfolio Holdings

Quarterly

Mercer Consulting, Inc.

Portfolio Characteristics, Top Holdings

Quarterly

Millennium Trust Company

Portfolio Holdings

Quarterly

Milliman & Associates

Portfolio Holdings

Quarterly

Monroe Vos Consulting

Portfolio Holdings

Quarterly

Monticello & Associates

Portfolio Holdings

Quarterly

Morningstar

Portfolio Holdings

Monthly

New England Pension Consulting

Portfolio Characteristics, Top Holdings

Quarterly

Patagonia

Portfolio Holdings

Quarterly

Prime Buchholz

Portfolio Holdings

Quarterly

PWC

Portfolio Holdings

Quarterly

R.V. Kuhns

Portfolio Holdings

Quarterly

Reliance Financial

Portfolio Holdings

Quarterly

Rocaton Investment Advisors

Portfolio Holdings

Quarterly

Rogers Casey

Portfolio Holdings

Quarterly

Sierra Fund

Portfolio Holdings

Quarterly

Smith Hayes Consulting

Portfolio Holdings

Quarterly

State of Idaho

Portfolio Holdings

Quarterly

Summit Investment Partners

Portfolio Holdings

Quarterly

Summit Strategies

Portfolio Holdings

Quarterly

Thomson Reuters/Lipper

Portfolio Holdings

Monthly

TIAA-CREF Trust Company

Portfolio Holdings

Quarterly

TRUSCO

Portfolio Holdings

Quarterly

Uhrlaub

Portfolio Holdings

Quarterly

Watson Wyatt

Portfolio Holdings

Quarterly

Wells Fargo Private Client Group

Portfolio Holdings

Quarterly

Wilshire Associates

Portfolio Holdings

Quarterly

Woodcock Financial

Portfolio Holdings

Quarterly

Wurts and Associates

Portfolio Holdings

Quarterly

35

 


 

 

 

PERSONAL SECURITIES TRANSACTIONS

 

The Fund, the Advisor and Subadvisors, as applicable, and principal underwriter have adopted a Code of Ethics pursuant to Rule 17j-1 of the 1940 Act. The Code of Ethics is designed to protect the public from abusive trading practices and to maintain ethical standards of the Advisor as defined in the rule when dealing with the public. The Code of Ethics permits associated persons of the Fund, the Advisor and Subadvisors, as applicable, and principal underwriter, to invest in securities that may be purchased or held by the Portfolios. The Code of Ethics contains certain conditions such as preclearance and restrictions on use of material nonpublic information.

 

PROXY VOTING DISCLOSURE

 

Please refer to Appendix A of this SAI for the Global Proxy Voting Guidelines For Calvert Family of Funds. The Guidelines include the policies and procedures that the Portfolios use in determining how to vote proxies relating to Portfolio securities other than the securities of investment companies acquired by a Portfolio in reliance on Section 12(d)(1)(F) of the 1940 Act for which the Portfolio will either seek instruction from the Portfolio’s shareholders with regard to the voting of all proxies and vote in accordance with such instructions, or vote the shares held by the Portfolio in the same proportion as the vote of all other holders of such security.  The Guidelines also include the policies and procedures that the Portfolios use in determining when a vote presents a possible conflict of interest between the interests of a Portfolio’s shareholders, and those of a Portfolio's Advisor, principal underwriter, or an affiliated person of the Portfolio, its Advisor, or principal underwriter.

 

PROCESS FOR DELIVERING SHAREHOLDER
COMMUNICATIONS TO THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

 

Any shareholder who wishes to send a communication to the Board of Directors of the Fund should send the communication to the attention of the Fund's Secretary at the following address:

 

                Calvert Funds

                Attn: [Name of Fund] Secretary

                4550 Montgomery Avenue

                Suite 1000N

                Bethesda, Maryland 20814

 

All communications should state the specific Portfolio to which the communication relates. After reviewing the communication, the Fund’s Secretary will forward the communication to the Board of Directors. 

In its function as a nominating committee, the Governance Committee of the Board of Directors will consider any candidates for vacancies on the Board from any shareholder of a Portfolio who, for at least five years, has continuously owned at least 0.5% of the outstanding shares of the Portfolio. Shareholders of a Portfolio who wish to nominate a candidate to the Board of the Fund must submit the recommendation in writing to the attention of the Fund’s Secretary at 4550 Montgomery Avenue, Suite 1000N, Bethesda, MD 20814. The recommendation must include biographical information, including business experience for the past ten years and a description of the qualifications of the proposed nominee, along with a statement from the proposed nominee that he or she is willing to serve and meets the requirements to be an independent Director. A shareholder wishing to recommend to the Governance Committee of the Fund a candidate for election as a Director may request the Fund’s Policy for the Consideration of Director Nominees by contacting the Fund’s Secretary at the address above.

36

 


 

 

If a shareholder wishes to send a communication directly to an individual Director or to a Committee of the Fund’s Board of Directors, then the communication should be specifically addressed to such individual Director or Committee and sent in care of the Fund’s Secretary at the address above. Communications to individual Directors or to a Committee sent in care of the Fund’s Secretary will be forwarded to the individual Director or to the Committee, as applicable.

 

INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM AND CUSTODIAN

 

                KPMG LLP serves as the independent registered public accounting firm for the Portfolios.  State Street Bank & Trust Company, N.A. serves as custodian of the Portfolios’ investments. The custodian has no part in deciding the Portfolios’ investment policies or the choice of securities that are to be purchased or sold for the Portfolios.

 

GENERAL INFORMATION

 

Each Portfolio is a series of Calvert Variable Products, Inc., an open-end management investment company organized as a Maryland Corporation. All of the Portfolios are diversified. Each share of each series represents an equal proportionate interest in that series with each other share and is entitled to such dividends and distributions out of the income belonging to such series as declared by the Board. Each Portfolio offers a single class of shares.  Upon liquidation of a Portfolio, shareholders are entitled to share pro rata in the net assets belonging to that series available for distribution.

The Fund issues separate shares for each Portfolio. Shares of each of the Portfolios have equal rights with regard to voting, redemptions, dividends, distributions, and liquidations. No Portfolio has preference over another Portfolio. The Insurance Companies and a Portfolio’s shareholders will vote Portfolio shares allocated to registered separate accounts in accordance with instructions received from policyholders. Under certain circumstances, which are described in the accompanying prospectus of the variable life or annuity policy, the voting instructions received from variable life or annuity policyholders may be disregarded.

All shares of common stock have equal voting rights (regardless of the NAV per share) except that only shares of the respective Portfolio are entitled to vote on matters concerning only that Portfolio. Pursuant to the 1940 Act and the rules and regulations thereunder, certain matters approved by a vote of all shareholders of the Fund may not be binding on a Portfolio whose shareholders have not approved that matter. Each issued and outstanding share is entitled to one vote and to participate equally in dividends and distributions declared by the respective Portfolio and, upon liquidation or dissolution, in net assets of such Portfolio remaining after satisfaction of outstanding liabilities. The shares of each Portfolio, when issued, will be fully paid and non-assessable and have no preemptive or conversion rights. Holders of shares of any Portfolio are entitled to redeem their shares as set forth above under “Purchase and Redemption of Shares.” The shares do not have cumulative voting rights, and the holders of more than 50% of the shares of the Fund voting for the election of Directors can elect all of the Directors of the Fund if they choose to do so and in such event the holders of the remaining shares would not be able to elect any Directors.

The Fund’s Board of Directors has adopted a “proportional voting” policy, meaning that Insurance Companies will vote all of a Portfolio’s shares, including shares the Insurance Companies hold, in return for providing the Portfolio with its capital and in payment of charges made against the variable annuity or variable life separate accounts, in proportion to the votes received from contractholders or policyowners. As a result of proportional voting, a small number of contractholders and/or policyowners may determine the outcome of a shareholder vote.

The Fund is not required to hold annual policyholder meetings, but special meetings may be called for certain purposes such as electing Directors, changing fundamental policies, or approving a management contract. As a policyholder, you can instruct the respective Insurance Company how to vote each share in which you have a beneficial interest.

37

 


 

 

 

CONTROL PERSONS AND PRINCIPAL HOLDERS OF SECURITIES

 

Because the Portfolios have not yet commenced operations, as of March 31, 2013, no entity beneficially owned more than 25% of the voting securities of Portfolios.

 

          FUND SERVICE PROVIDERS

 

INVESTMENT ADVISOR

Calvert Investment Management, Inc.

4550 Montgomery Avenue

Suite 1000N

Bethesda, Maryland 20814

 

Shareholder Servicing agent                                                            

Calvert Investment Services, Inc.                                                                     

4550 Montgomery Avenue                                                                               

Suite 1000N                                                                                                          

Bethesda, Maryland 20814                                                                                

 

PRINCIPAL UNDERWRITER                                                                           

Calvert Investment Distributors, Inc.                                                              

4550 Montgomery Avenue                                                                               

Suite 1000N                                                                                                          

Bethesda, Maryland 20814

 

ADMINSTRATIVE SERVICES AGENT                                                          

Calvert Investment Administrative Services, Inc.                                         

4550 Montgomery Avenue                                                                               

Suite 1000N                                                                                                          

Bethesda, Maryland 20814

 

TRANSFER AGENT

Boston Financial Data Services, Inc.

330 West 9th Street

Kansas City, Missouri 64105

 

INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

KPMG LLP

1601 Market Street

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103

 

CUSTODIAN

State Street Bank & Trust Company, N.A.

225 Franklin Street

Boston, Massachusetts 02110

 

38

 


 

 

 

APPENDIX A

 

 

GLOBAL PROXY VOTING GUIDELINES

FOR

CALVERT FAMILY OF FUNDS

 

I.              Introduction

Calvert believes that healthy corporations are characterized by sound corporate governance and overall corporate sustainability and social responsibility.  The well-governed company meets high standards of corporate ethics and operates in the best interests of shareowners.  The sustainable and socially responsible company meets high standards of corporate ethics and operates in the best interests of other stakeholders (employees, customers, communities and the environment).  In our view, companies that combine good governance and corporate sustainability and social responsibility are better positioned for long-term success. 

·         Long-Term Value.  Responsible, healthy companies are those that focus on long-term value creation that aligns the interests of management with those of shareowners and other stakeholders.  Good governance is likely to be compromised when a company becomes myopic, focusing on current earnings expectations and other short-term goals rather than the fundamental soundness of the enterprise over the longer term.  A focus on long-term value creation also increases the relevance of companies’ environmental management, treatment of workers and communities, and other sustainability and social responsibility factors.  Just as a short-term focus on earnings performance can compromise long-term shareowner interests, so can poor treatment of workers, communities, the environment or other stakeholders create short-term gain while increasing risks and compromising performance over the longer term.   Calvert’s proxy voting guidelines support governance structures and policies that keep the focus of company management on long-term corporate health and sustainable financial, social and environmental performance. 

·         Accountability.   Corporate management must be accountable to many interests, including investors, stakeholders, and regulators.  Management of a company must be accountable to the board of directors; the board must be accountable to the company’s shareowners; and the board and management together must be accountable to the stakeholders.  Some governance structures by their very nature weaken accountability, including corporations that are too insulated from possible takeovers.  Certain other governance structures are well suited to manage this accountability:  independent boards that represent a wide variety of interests and perspectives; full disclosure of company performance on financial, environmental, and social metrics; charters, bylaws, and procedures that allow shareholders to express their wishes and concerns; and compensation structures that work to align the interests and time-frames of management and owners.  Calvert’s proxy voting guidelines support structures that create and reinforce accountability, and oppose those that do not.

·           Sustainability.   Well-governed companies are those whose operations are financially, socially and environmentally sustainable. Sustainability requires fair treatment of shareholders and other stakeholders in order to position the company for continued viability and growth over time.  Effective corporate governance, like national governance, cannot indefinitely ignore or exploit certain groups or interests to the benefit of others without incurring mounting risks for the corporation.  For example, companies that provide excessive compensation to executives at the expense of other employees and shareowners are creating risks that may be expressed in rising employee turnover or activist campaigns targeting corporate practices.  Companies that fail to account for potential liabilities associated with climate change may be creating risks that will be expressed in costly government regulation or uninsured catastrophic losses.  Calvert’s proxy voting guidelines aim to support sustainable governance that attends fairly to the interests of shareowners, workers, communities and the environment.

39

 


 

 

As a long-term equity investor, Calvert strives to encourage corporate responsibility, which includes respectful treatment of workers, suppliers, customers and communities, environmental stewardship, product integrity and high standards of corporate ethics as well as more traditional measures of sound corporate governance.   Companies that combine good governance and social responsibility strive to avoid unnecessary financial risk while serving the interests of both shareowners and stakeholders.  In our view, Good Governance + Sustainability and Social Responsibility = Corporate Responsibility. 

On behalf of our shareholders, Calvert Funds generally vote our proxies in accordance with the positions set forth in these Proxy Voting Guidelines ("the Guidelines").   The Guidelines are not meant to be exhaustive, nor can they anticipate every potential voting issue on which the Funds may be asked to cast their proxies.  There also may be instances when the Advisor votes the Funds’ shares in a manner that does not strictly adhere to or is inconsistent with these Guidelines if doing so is in the best interests of the Funds’ shareholders. Also, to the extent that the Guidelines do not address potential voting issues, the Funds delegate to the appropriate advisor the authority to act on its behalf to promote the applicable Funds’ investment objectives and social goals.  To the extent the Funds vote proxies in a manner not strictly in accordance with these Guidelines, and such votes present a potential conflict of interest, the Funds will proceed in accordance with Section IV below.

Calvert appreciates that issues brought to shareholders may change over time, as both investors’ concerns and rules governing inclusion of specific items in corporate proxies change.  Corporate governance laws and best practices codes are continuously evolving, worldwide. We have constructed these Guidelines to be both general enough and sufficiently flexible to adapt to such changes.  Internationally, corporate governance codes have more in common with each other than do the laws and cultures of the countries in which the companies are domiciled. In light of these different regulatory contexts the Fund advisor will assess both best practices in the country in question and consistency with the Fund's Guidelines prior to voting proxies. To that end, we have not attempted to address every specific issue that may arise on a proxy ballot.

Calvert’s proxy voting record is available on the Funds’ web site, www.calvert.com, and is also available on the Securities and Exchange Commission’s website at www.sec.gov.

II.            CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

A.            Board and Governance Issues

The board of directors ("the board") is responsible for the overall governance of the corporation, including representing the interests of shareowners and overseeing the company’s relationships with other stakeholders.  While company boards in most countries do not have a statutory responsibility to protect stakeholders, the duties of care and loyalty encompass the brand, financial, and reputational risks that can result from inadequate attention to stakeholder interests.  Thus, in our view, a board’s fiduciary duties encompass stakeholder relations as well as protecting shareowner interests. 

40

 


 

 

One of the most fundamental sources of good governance is independence.  Directors who have financial or other affiliations with companies on whose boards they serve may face conflicts of interest between their own interests and those of the corporation’s shareowners and other stakeholders.  In our view, the board should be composed of a majority of independent directors and key committees, including the audit, compensation, and nominating and/or governance committees, should be composed exclusively of independent directors. 

Independent directors are those who do not have a material financial or personal relationship with the company or any of its managers that could compromise the director’s objectivity and fiduciary responsibility to shareowners.  In general, this means that an independent director should have no affiliation with the company other than a seat on the board and (in some cases) ownership of sufficient company stock to give the director a stake in the company’s financial performance, but not so great as to constitute a controlling or significant interest.

Because the board’s ability to represent shareowners independently of management can be compromised when the Chair is also a member of management, it is beneficial for the Chair of the board to be an independent director.   

Another critical component of good governance is diversity.  Well-governed companies benefit from a wide diversity of perspective and background on their boards.  To bring such diversity to the board, directors should be chosen to reflect diversity of experience, perspective, expertise, gender, race, culture, age and geography.  Calvert believes that in an increasingly complex global marketplace, the ability to draw on a wide range of viewpoints, backgrounds, skills, and experience is critical to a company's success. Corporate diversity helps companies increase the likelihood of making the right strategic and operational decisions, contributes to a more positive public image and reputation, and catalyzes efforts to recruit, retain, and promote the best people, including women and minorities.

Companies that are private may take some time to achieve an adequate balance of diversity and independence on their boards.  For private companies, the fund advisor will vote on a case-by-case basis on board independence and board diversity matters.

Each director should also be willing and able to devote sufficient time and effort to the duties of a director.  Directors who routinely fail to attend board meetings, regardless of the number of boards on which they serve, are not devoting sufficient attention to good corporate governance.

The board should periodically evaluate its performance, the performance of its various committees, and the performance of individual board members in governing the corporation. 

Board Independence

·         The Fund advisor will oppose  slates of directors without at least a majority of independent directors. 

·         The Fund advisor will support proposals requesting that the majority of directors be independent and that the board audit, compensation and/or nominating committees be composed exclusively of independent directors.

·         The Fund advisor will oppose non-independent directors candidates nominated to the audit, compensation and/or nominating committees.

·         The Fund advisor will support proposals seeking to separate the positions of Chair of the board and Chief Executive Officer as well as resolutions asking for the Chair to be an independent director.    

Board Diversity

·         The Fund advisor will oppose  slates of directors that result in a board that does not include both women and people of color.

41

 


 

 

·         The Fund advisor will support  proposals requesting that companies adopt policies or nominating committee charters to assure that diversity is a key attribute of every director search.

Board Accountability

·         The Fund advisor will oppose  slates of directors in situations where the company failed to take action on shareowner proposals that passed in previous years. 

·         The Fund advisor will ordinarily oppose  director candidates who have not attended a sufficient number of meetings of the board or key committees on which they served to effectively discharge their duties as directors.

·         The Fund advisor will oppose directors who sit on more than four public company boards and oppose directors serve as CEO and sit on more than two additional boards. 

Board Committee on Sustainability/Corporate Social Responsibility Issues

Shareholders have filed binding resolutions seeking the creation of a board committee dedicated to long term strategic thinking and risk management of sustainability issues including environment, human rights, diversity and others. While we believe all directors should be informed and active on sustainability issues, we do see the value of a focused sustainability committee.

·         The Fund advisor will ordinarily support  the creation of a board level committee on sustainability/corporate social responsibility issues. 

Limitations, Director Liability and Indemnification

Because of increased litigation brought against directors of corporations and the increased costs of director's liability insurance, many states have passed laws limiting director liability for actions taken in good faith. It is argued that such indemnification is necessary for companies to be able to attract the most qualified individuals to their boards. 

·         The Fund advisor will ordinarily support  proposals seeking to indemnify directors and limit director liability for acts excluding fraud or other wanton or willful misconduct or illegal acts, but will oppose  proposals seeking to indemnify directors for all acts.

Limit Directors' Tenure

Corporate directors generally may stand for re-election indefinitely.  Opponents of this practice suggest that limited tenure would inject new perspectives into the boardroom as well as possibly creating room for directors from diverse backgrounds.  However, continuity is also important and there are other mechanisms such as voting against or withholding votes during the election of directors, which shareholders can use to voice their opposition to certain candidates.  It may be in the best interests of the shareowners for long-serving directors to remain on the board, providing they maintain their independence as well as the independent perspective they bring to the board.

·         The Fund advisor will examine and vote on a case-by-case basis proposals to limit director tenure.   

Director Stock Ownership

Advocates of requirements that directors own shares of company stock argue that stock ownership helps to align the interests of directors with the interests of shareowners.  Yet there are ways that such requirements may also undermine good governance:  limiting board service only to those who can afford to purchase shares; or encouraging companies to use stock awards as part or all of director compensation.  In the latter case, unless there are mandatory holding requirements or other stipulations that help to assure that director and shareowner incentives are indeed aligned, awards of stock as compensation can create conflicts of interest where board members may make decisions for personal gain rather than for the benefit of shareowners.  Thus, in some circumstances director stock ownership requirements may be beneficial and in others detrimental to the creation of long-term shareowner value.

42

 


 

 

·         The Fund advisor will examine and vote on a case-by-case basis proposals requiring that corporate directors own shares in the company.   

·         The Fund advisor will oppose  excessive awards of stock or stock options to directors. 

Director Elections

Contested Election of Directors

Contested elections of directors frequently occur when a board or shareholder nominated candidate or slate runs for the purpose of seeking a significant change or improvement in corporate policy, control, or structure. Competing slates will be evaluated based upon the personal qualifications of the candidates, the economic impact of the policies that they advance, and their expressed and demonstrated commitment to the interests of all shareholders.

·         The Fund advisor will evaluate director nominees on case-by-case  basis in contested election of directors.

Classified or Staggered Boards

On a classified (or staggered) board, directors are divided into separate classes with directors in each class elected to overlapping three-year terms. Companies argue that such boards offer continuity in strategic direction, which promotes long-term planning. However, in some instances these structures may deter legitimate efforts to elect new directors or takeover attempts that may benefit shareowners.

·         The Fund advisor will ordinarily support  proposals to elect all board members annually and to remove classified boards.

Majority Vote Standard

A majority voting standard allows shareholders with a majority of votes in favor or against determine the election of board nominees.  Currently, most board elections are uncontested and allow directors to be elected with a plurality of votes.  Calvert believes majority voting increases director accountability to shareholders, as directors recognize shareholders have a voice in the election process.

·         The Fund advisor will generally support  both precatory and binding resolutions seeking to establish a majority vote standard.

Cumulative Voting

Cumulative voting allows shareowners to "stack" their votes behind one or a few directors running for the board, thereby helping a minority of shareowners to win board representation. Cumulative voting gives minority shareowners a voice in corporate affairs proportionate to their actual strength in voting shares.  However, like many tools, cumulative voting can be misused.   In general, where shareowner rights and voice are well protected by a strong, diverse, and independent board and key committees, where shareowners may call special meetings or act by written consent, and in the absence of strong anti-takeover provisions, cumulative voting is usually unnecessary.

·         The Fund advisor will examine and vote on a case-by-case basis proposals calling for cumulative voting in the election of directors. 

 

43

 


 

 

Shareholder Rights

Supermajority Vote Requirements

Supermajority vote requirements in a company's charter or bylaws require a level of voting approval in excess of a simple majority. Generally, supermajority provisions require at least 2/3 affirmative votes for passage of issues.

·         The Fund advisor will ordinarily oppose  supermajority vote requirements.

Shareowner Access to Proxy

Equal access proposals ask companies to give shareowners access to proxy materials to state their views on contested issues, including director nominations. In some cases, such proposals allow shareowners holding a certain percentage of shares to nominate directors.  There is no reason why management should be allowed to nominate directors while shareowners – whom directors are supposed to represent – are deprived of the same right.    We support the view that shareowners should be granted access to the proxy ballot in the nomination of directors. 

·         The Fund advisor will ordinarily support proposals for shareowner access to the proxy ballot.

Restrictions on Shareowners Acting by Written Consent

Written consent allows shareowners to initiate and carry out a shareowner action without waiting until the annual meeting, or by calling a special meeting.  It permits action to be taken by the written consent of the same percentage of outstanding shares that would be required to effect the proposed action at a shareowner meeting.

·         The Fund advisor will ordinarily oppose proposals to restrict, limit or eliminate the right of shareowners to act by written consent.

·         The Fund advisor will ordinarily support  proposals to allow or facilitate shareowner action by written consent.

Restrictions on Shareowners Calling Meetings

It is common for company management to retain the right to call special meetings of shareowners at any time, but shareowners often do not have similar rights.  In general, we support the right of shareowners to call special meetings, even in extraordinary circumstances, such as consideration of a takeover bid.  Restrictions on the right of shareowners to call a meeting can also restrict the ability of shareowners to force company management to consider shareowner proposals or director candidates. 

·         The Fund advisor will ordinarily oppose restrictions on the right of shareowners to call special meetings; as such restrictions limit the right of shareowners to participate in governance.

Dual or Multiple Classes of Stock

In order to maintain corporate control in the hands of a certain group of shareowners, companies may seek to create multiple classes of stock with differing rights pertaining to voting and dividends.  Creation of multiple classes of stock limits the right of some shareowners – often a majority of shareowners – to exercise influence over the governance of the corporation.   This approach in turn diffuses directors’ incentives to exercise appropriate oversight and control over management.

·         The Fund advisor will ordinarily oppose  proposals to create dual classes of stock.  However, the advisor will examine and vote on a case-by-case basis proposals to create classes of stock offering different dividend rights (such as one class that pays cash dividends and a second that pays stock dividends), and may support such proposals if they do not limit shareowner rights.

44

 


 

 

·         The Fund advisor will ordinarily support proposals to recapitalize stock such that each share is equal to one vote.

Ratification of Auditor and Audit Committee

The annual shareholder ratification of the outside auditors is standard practice.  While it is recognized that the company is in the best position to evaluate the competence of the outside auditors, we believe that outside auditors must ultimately be accountable to shareowners.   Further, Calvert recognizes the critical responsibilities of the audit committee and its members including the oversight of financial statements and internal reporting controls. 

·         The Fund advisor will ordinarily oppose  proposals seeking ratification of the auditor when fees for non-audit consulting services exceed 25 % of all fees or in any other case where the advisor determines that the independence of the auditor may be compromised.

·         The Fund advisor will ordinarily support  proposals to adopt a policy to ensure that the auditor will only provide audit services to the company and not provide other services.

·         The Fund advisor will ordinarily support proposals that set a reasonable mandatory rotation of the auditor (at least every five years).

·         The Fund advisor will ordinarily support proposals that call for more stringent measures to ensure auditor independence.

In a number of countries companies routinely appoint internal statutory auditors.

·         The Fund advisor will ordinarily support  the appointment or reelection of internal statutory auditors unless there are concerns about audit methods used or the audit reports produced, or if there are questions regarding the auditors being voted on.

In some countries, shareholder election of auditors is not common practice.

·         The Fund advisor will ordinarily support  proposals that call for the annual election of auditors by shareholders.

Audit Committee

·         The Fund advisor will ordinarily oppose  members of the audit committee where the audit committee has approved an audit contract where non-audit fees exceed audit fees or in any other case where the advisor determines that the independence of the auditor may be compromised.

·         The Fund advisor will ordinarily oppose members of the audit committee at companies with ineffective internal controls, considering whether the company has a history of accounting issues, or significant recent problems, and the board’s response to them

Transparency and Disclosure

International corporate governance is constantly changing and there have been waves of development of governance codes around the world.  The common thread throughout all of these codes is that shareowners want their companies to be transparent.

·         The Fund advisor will ordinarily support proposals that call for full disclosure of company financial performance.

45

 


 

 

·         The Fund advisor will ordinarily support  proposals that call for an annual financial audit by external and independent auditors.

·         The Fund advisor will ordinarily support proposals that call for disclosure of ownership, structure, and objectives of companies, including the rights of minority shareholders vis-à-vis the rights of major shareholders.

·         The Fund advisor will ordinarily support  proposals that call for disclosure of corporate governance codes and structures.

·         The Fund advisor will ordinarily support  proposals that call for disclosure of related party transactions.

·         The Fund advisor will ordinarily support  proposals that call for disclosure of the board nominating process.

B.            Executive and Employee Compensation

Executive risks and rewards need to be better aligned with those of employees, shareowners and the long-term performance of the corporation.  Prosperity should be shared broadly within a company, as should the downside risk of share ownership.  Executive compensation packages should also be transparent and shareowners should have the right and responsibility to vote on compensation plans and strategy. 

There are many companies whose executive compensation seems disconnected from the actual performance of the corporation and creation of shareowner value.  The structure of these compensation plans often determines the level of alignment between management and shareowner interests.  Calvert stresses the importance of pay-for-performance, where executive compensation is linked to clearly defined and rigorous criteria.  These executives should not only enjoy the benefits when the company performs well, but boards should ensure executives are accordingly penalized when they are unable to meet established performance criteria. 

Stock option plans transfer significant amounts of wealth from shareowners to highly paid executives and directors.  Reasonable limits must be set on dilution caused by such plans, which should be designed to provide incentives as opposed to risk-free rewards.

Disclosure of CEO, Executive, Board and Employee Compensation

·         The Fund advisor will ordinarily support  proposals requesting companies disclose compensation practices and policies--including salaries, option awards, bonuses, and restricted stock grants--of top management, Board of Directors, and employees.

CEO and Executive Compensation 

·         The Fund advisor will oppose executive compensation proposals if we determine that the compensation does not reflect the financial, economic and social circumstances of the company (i.e., during times of financial strains or underperformance).

·         The Fund advisor will support  proposals seeking to establish an annual shareholder advisory vote on compensation.

·         The Fund advisor will ordinarily oppose  proposals seeking shareholder ratification of the company’s executive officers’ compensation (also known as an Advisory Vote on Compensation) if executive risks and rewards are not aligned with the interests of shareowners and the long-term performance of the corporation. The Fund advisor will ordinarily oppose  compensation proposals if the company’s compensation program is not adequately described, if incentive compensation is awarded despite a failure to meet established performance targets, or if the company awards termination payments that are not justified by the company’s prior performance.

46

 


 

 

Compensation Committee

·         The Fund advisor may oppose  members of the compensation committee when it is determined they have approved compensation plans that are deemed excessive or have not amended their policies in response to shareholder concern.

Executive & Employee Stock Option Plans

·         The Fund advisor will ordinarily oppose  proposals to approve stock option plans in which the dilutive effect exceeds 10 percent of share value. 

·         The Fund advisor will ordinarily oppose  proposals to approve stock option plans that do not contain provisions prohibiting automatic re-pricing, unless such plans are indexed to a peer group or other measurement so long as the performance benchmark is predetermined prior to the grant date and not subject to change retroactively.

·         The Fund advisor will examine and ordinarily oppose  proposals for re-pricing of underwater options.  

·         The Fund advisor will ordinarily oppose  proposals to approve stock option plans that have option exercise prices below the market price on the day of the grant. 

·         The Fund advisor will ordinarily support  proposals requiring that all option plans and option re-pricing are submitted for shareholder approval.

·         The Fund advisor will ordinarily oppose  proposals to approve stock option plans with "evergreen" features, reserving a specified percentage of stock for award each year with no termination date.

·         The Fund advisor will ordinarily support  proposals to approve stock option plans for outside directors subject to the same constraints previously described.

·         The Fund advisor will support  proposals to approve Employee Stock Ownership Plans (ESOPs) created to promote active employee ownership (e.g., those that pass through voting rights on all matters to a trustee or fiduciary who is independent from company management).  The Fund advisor will oppose  any ESOP whose primary purpose is to prevent a corporate takeover

Expensing of Stock Options

Calvert’s view is that the expensing of stock options gives shareholders valuable additional information about companies’ financial performance, and should therefore be encouraged.

·         The Fund advisor will ordinarily support  proposals requesting that companies expense stock options.

Pay Equity

·         The Fund advisor will support  proposals requesting that management provide a pay equity report.

 

 

47

 


 

 

Ratio Between CEO and Worker Pay

·         The Fund advisor will support  proposals requesting that management report on the ratio between CEO and employee compensation.

·         The Fund advisor will examine and vote on a case-by-case basis proposals requesting management to set a maximum limit on executive compensation. 

Executive Compensation Tie to Non-Financial Performance

·         The Fund advisor will support  proposals asking companies to review their executive compensation as it links to non-financial performance such as diversity, labor and human rights, environment, community relations, and other sustainability and/or corporate social responsibility-related issues.

Severance Agreements

Severance payments are compensation agreements that provide for top executives who are terminated or demoted pursuant to a takeover or other change in control. Companies argue that such provisions are necessary to keep executives from "jumping ship" during potential takeover attempts. Calvert believes boards should allow shareholders the ability to ratify such severance or change in control agreements to determine if such awards are excessive and unnecessary.    

·         The Fund advisor will support  proposals providing shareowners the right to ratify adoption of severance or change in control agreements.

·         The Fund advisor will examine and vote on a case-by-case basis severance or change in control agreements, based upon an evaluation of the particular agreement itself and taking into consideration total management compensation, the employees covered by the plan, quality of management, size of the payout and any leveraged buyout or takeover restrictions.

·         The Fund advisor will oppose  the election of compensation committee members who approve se

C.            Mergers, Acquisitions, Spin-offs, and Other Corporate Restructuring

Mergers and acquisitions frequently raise significant issues of corporate strategy, and as such should be considered very carefully by shareowners.  Mergers, in particular, may have the effect of profoundly changing corporate governance, for better or worse, as two corporations with different cultures, traditions, and strategies become one. 

Considering the Non-Financial Effects of a Merger Proposal

Such proposals allow or require the board to consider the impact of merger decisions on various stakeholders, including employees, communities of place or interest, customers, and business partners, and give the board the right to reject a tender offer on the grounds that it would adversely affect the company's stakeholders.

·         The Fund advisor will support  proposals that consider non-financial impacts of mergers. 

·         The Fund advisor will examine and vote on a case-by-case basis all merger and acquisition proposals, and will support those that offer value to shareowners while protecting or improving the company’s social, environmental, and governance performance.

·         The Fund advisor will ordinarily oppose  proposals for corporate acquisition, takeover, restructuring plans that include significant new takeover defenses or that pose other potential financial, social, or environmental risks or liabilities.

48

 


 

 

Opt-Out of State Anti-takeover Law

Several states have enacted anti-takeover statutes to protect companies against hostile takeovers.  In some, directors or shareowners are required to opt in for such provisions to be operational; in others, directors or shareowners may opt out.   Hostile takeovers come in many forms.  Some offer advantages to shareowners by replacing current management with more effective management.  Others do not.  Shareowners of both the acquirer and the target firms stand to lose or gain significantly, depending on the terms of the takeover, the strategic attributes of the takeover, and the price and method of acquisition.  In general, shareowners should have the right to consider all potential takeovers, hostile or not, and vote their shares based on their assessment of the particular offer. 

·         The Fund advisor will ordinarily support  proposals for bylaw changes allowing a company to opt out of state anti-takeover laws and will oppose  proposals requiring companies to opt into state anti-takeover statutes. 

Charter and By-Laws

There may be proposals involving changes to corporate charters or by-laws that are not otherwise addressed in or anticipated by these Guidelines.

·         The Fund advisor will examine and vote on a case-by-case basis proposals to amend or change corporate charter or by-laws, and may support  such proposals if they are deemed consistent with shareholders’ best interests and the principles of sound governance and overall corporate social responsibility/sustainability underlying these Guidelines.

Reincorporation

Corporations are bound by the laws of the states in which they are incorporated.  Companies reincorporate for a variety of reasons, including shifting incorporation to a state where the company has its most active operations or corporate headquarters.  In other cases, reincorporation is done to take advantage of stronger state corporate takeover laws, or to reduce tax or regulatory burdens.  In these instances, reincorporation may result in greater costs to stakeholders, or in loss of valuable shareowner rights. Finally, changes in state law have made reincorporating in certain locations more or less favorable to governance issues such as shareholder rights.

·         The Fund advisor will ordinarily support  proposals to reincorporate for valid business reasons (such as reincorporating in the same state as the corporate headquarters). 

·         The Fund advisor will review on a case-by-case  basis proposals to reincorporate for improvements in governance structure and policies (such as reincorporating in states like North Dakota, with shareholder friendly provisions).

·         The Fund advisor will ordinarily oppose  proposals to reincorporate outside the United States if the advisor determines that such reincorporation is no more than the establishment of a skeleton offshore headquarters or mailing address for purposes of tax avoidance, and the company does not have substantial business activities in the country in which it proposes to reincorporate.

Common Stock Authorization

Companies may choose to increase their authorization of common stock for a variety of reasons.  In some instances, the intended purpose of the increased authorization may clearly benefit shareowners; in others, the benefits to shareowners are less clear.  Given that increased authorization of common stock is dilutive, except where the authorization is being used to facilitate a stock split or stock dividend, proposed increases in authorized common stock must be examined carefully to determine whether the benefits of issuing additional stock outweigh the potential dilution.

49

 


 

 

·         The Fund advisor will ordinarily support  proposals authorizing the issuance of additional common stock necessary to facilitate a stock split.

·         The Fund advisor will examine and vote on a case-by case basis proposals authorizing the issuance of additional common stock.  If the company already has a large amount of stock authorized but not issued, or reserved for its stock option plans, or where the request is to increase shares by more than 100 percent of the current authorization, the Fund advisor will ordinarily oppose  the proposals (unless there is a convincing business plan for use of additional authorized common stock) due to concerns that the authorized but unissued shares will be used as a poison pill or other takeover defense.

Blank Check Preferred Stock

Blank check preferred stock is stock with a fixed dividend and a preferential claim on company assets relative to common shares. The terms of the stock (voting, dividend, and conversion rights) are set by the board at a future date without further shareowner action. While such an issue can in theory have legitimate corporate purposes, most often it has been used as an anti-takeover device.

·         The Fund advisor will ordinarily oppose  the creation of blank check preferred stock.  In addition, the Fund advisor will ordinarily oppose  increases in authorization of preferred stock with unspecified terms and conditions of use that may be determined by the board at a future date, without approval of shareholders.

Poison Pills

Poison pills (or shareowner rights plans) are triggered by an unwanted takeover attempt and cause a variety of events to occur which may make the company financially less attractive to the suitor. Typically, directors have enacted these plans without shareowner approval. Most poison pill resolutions deal with shareowner ratification of poison pills or repealing them altogether.

·         The Fund advisor will support  proposals calling for shareowner approval of poison pills or shareholder rights plans. 

·         The Fund advisor will ordinarily oppose  poison pills or shareowner rights plans.

Greenmail

Greenmail is the premium a takeover target firm offers to a corporate raider in exchange for the raider’s shares.  This usually means that the bidder’s shares are purchased at a price higher than market price, discriminating against other shareowners.

·         The Fund advisor will ordinarily support  anti-greenmail provisions and oppose  the payment of greenmail.

III.          CORPORATE SUSTAINABILITY AND SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY

A.            Sustainability Reporting

The global economy of the 21st century must find ways to encourage new approaches to wealth creation that raises living standards (particularly in the developing world) while preserving and protecting fragile ecosystems and vital resources that did not factor into previous economic models.  In response to this new imperative, the notion of sustainability (or sustainable development) has emerged as a core theme of public policy and corporate responsibility.  Investors increasingly see financial materiality in corporate management of environmental, social and governance issues. Producing and disclosing a sustainability report demonstrates that a company is broadly aware of business risks and opportunities and has established programs to manage its exposure.    As companies strive to translate the concept of sustainability into practice and measure their performance, this has created a growing demand for broadly accepted sustainability performance indicators and reporting guidelines.  There are many forms of sustainability reporting, with one of the most comprehensive systems being the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) reporting guidelines.

50

 


 

 

·         The Fund advisor will ordinarily support  proposals asking companies to prepare sustainability reports, including publishing annual reports in accordance with the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) or other reasonable international codes of conduct or reporting models.

·         The Fund advisor will ordinarily support  proposals requesting that companies conduct social and/or environmental audits of their performance.

B.            Environment 

All corporations have an impact on the environment. A company's environmental policies and performance can have a substantial effect on the firm's financial performance. We expect management to take all reasonable steps to reduce negative environmental impacts and a company’s overall environmental footprint. 

·         The Fund advisor will ordinarily support  proposals to reduce negative environmental impacts and a company’s overall environmental footprint, including any threats to biodiversity in ecologically sensitive areas.

·         The Fund advisor will ordinarily support  proposals asking companies to report on their environmental practices, policies and impacts, including environmental damage and health risks resulting from operations, and the impact of environmental liabilities on shareowner value. 

·         The Fund advisor will ordinarily support proposals asking companies to prepare a comprehensive report on recycling or waste management efforts, to increase recycling efforts, or to adopt a formal recycling policy.

Ceres Principles

The Coalition for Environmentally Responsible Economies (Ceres), a coalition comprised of social investors and environmental organizations, has developed an environmental corporate code of conduct.  The Ceres Principles ask corporations to conduct environmental audits of their operations, establish environmental management practices, assume responsibility for damage they cause to the environment and take other leadership initiatives on the environment.  Shareholder resolutions are frequently introduced asking companies to: 1) become signatories of the Ceres Principles; or 2) produce a report addressing management’s response to each of the points raised in the Ceres Principles. 

·         The Fund advisor will support  proposals requesting that a company become a signatory to the Ceres Principles.

Climate Change/Global Warming

Shareholder initiatives on climate change have focused on companies that contribute significantly to global warming—including oil and mining companies, utilities, and automobile manufacturers.  Increasingly, corporations in a wider variety of industries are facing shareowner proposals on climate change as shareowners recognize that companies can take cost-effective—and often cost-saving—steps to reduce energy use that contribute to climate change.  Initiatives have included proposals requesting companies to disclose information, using guidelines such as those prepared by the Carbon Disclosure Project.  This includes information about the company’s impact on climate change, policies and targets for reducing greenhouse gas emissions, increasing energy efficiency, and substituting some forms of renewable energy resources for fossil fuels.

51

 


 

 

·         The Fund advisor will support  proposals requesting that companies disclose information on greenhouse gas emissions or take specific actions, at reasonable cost, to mitigate climate change, including reducing greenhouse gas emissions and developing and using renewable or other less-polluting energy sources.

·         The Fund advisor will support  proposals seeking the preparation of a report on a company’s activities related to the development of renewable energy sources.

·         The Fund advisor will support  proposals seeking increased investment in renewable energy sources unless the terms of the resolution are overly restrictive.

Water

Proposals may be filed that ask a company to prepare a report evaluating the business risks linked to water use and impacts on the company’s supply chain, including subsidiaries and water user partners. Such proposals may also ask companies to disclose current policies and procedures for mitigating the impact of operations on local communities or ecosystems in areas of water scarcity.

·         The Fund advisor will support  proposals seeking the preparation of a report on a company’s risks linked to water use or impacts to water.

·         The Fund advisor will support proposals seeking the adoption of programs and policies that enhance access and affordability to safe drinking water and sanitation.

Environmental Justice

Quite often, corporate activities that damage the environment have a disproportional impact on poor people, people of color, indigenous peoples and other marginalized groups.  For example, companies will sometimes locate environmentally damaging operations in poor communities or in developing countries where poor or indigenous people have little or no voice in political and economic affairs.

·         The Fund advisor will ordinarily support  proposals asking companies to report on whether environmental and health risks posed by their activities fall disproportionately on any one group or groups, and to take action to reduce those risks at reasonable cost to the company. 

·         The Fund advisor will ordinarily support proposals asking companies to respect the rights of local and indigenous communities to participate in decisions affecting their local environment.

C.            Workplace Issues

Labor Relations

Companies’ treatment of their workers can have a pervasive effect on the performance of the enterprise, as well as on the communities and societies where such companies operate.  Calvert believes that well-governed, responsible corporations treat workers fairly in all locations, and avoid exploitation of poor or marginalized people.  Shareowner resolutions are sometimes filed asking companies to develop codes of conduct that address labor relations issues, including use of child labor, forced labor, safe working conditions, fair wages and the right to freedom of association and collective bargaining.

·         The Fund advisor will ordinarily support  proposals requesting companies to adopt, report on, and agree to independent monitoring of codes of conduct addressing global labor and human rights practices.

52

 


 

 

·         The Fund advisor will ordinarily support  proposals requesting that companies avoid exploitative labor practices, including child labor and forced labor.

·         The Fund advisor will ordinarily support  proposals requesting that companies commit to providing safe workplaces.

Vendor/Supplier Standards

Special attention has been focused on companies that use offshore vendors to manufacture or supply products for resale in the United States.  While many offshore vendors have satisfactory workplace practices, there have also been many instances of abuse, including forced labor, child labor, discrimination, intimidation and harassment of workers seeking to associate, organize or bargain collectively, unsafe working conditions, and other very poor working conditions.  Shareowner resolutions are sometimes filed asking companies to adopt codes of conduct regarding vendor/supplier labor practices, to report on compliance with such codes, and to support independent third party monitoring of compliance.  At the heart of these proposals is the belief that corporations that operate globally have both the power and the responsibility to curtail abusive labor practices on the part of their suppliers and vendors.

·         The Fund advisor will ordinarily support  proposals requesting that companies adopt codes of conduct and other vendor/supplier standards requiring that foreign suppliers and licensees comply with all applicable laws and/or international standards (such as the International Labor Organization’s core labor standards) regarding wages, benefits, working conditions, including laws and standards regarding discrimination, child labor and forced labor, worker health and safety, freedom of association and other rights.  This support includes proposals requesting compliance with vendor codes of conduct, compliance reporting, and third party monitoring or verification.

Diversity and Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO)

Women and minorities have long been subject to discrimination in the workplace - denied access to jobs, promotions, benefits and other entitlements on account of race or gender.  Women and minorities are still significantly underrepresented in the ranks of management and other high-income positions, and overrepresented in the more poorly-paid categories, including office and clerical workers and service workers. 

Shareowner resolutions are sometimes filed asking companies to report on their efforts to meet or exceed federal EEO mandates. Typically, such reporting involves little additional cost to the corporation since most, if not all, of the data is already gathered to meet government-reporting requirements (all firms with more than 100 employees, or federal contractors with more than 50 employees, must file EEO-1 reports with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission).  Shareowner resolutions have also been filed asking companies to extend non-discrimination policies to gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender employees.

·         The Fund advisor will ordinarily support  proposals asking companies to report on efforts to comply with federal EEO mandates.

·         The Fund advisor will support  proposals asking companies to report on their progress in meeting the recommendations of the Glass Ceiling Commission and to eliminate all vestiges of "glass ceilings" for women and minority employees.

·         The Fund advisor will ordinarily support  proposals asking companies to include language in EEO statements specifically barring discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation, and gender identity and/or expression, and to report on company initiatives to create a workplace free of discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity and/or expression.

·         The Fund advisor will ordinarily support  proposals seeking reports on a company’s initiatives to create a workplace free of discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity and/or expression.

53

 


 

 

·         The Fund advisor will oppose  proposals that seek to eliminate protection already afforded to gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender employees.

·         The Fund advisor will support  proposals seeking more careful consideration of the use of racial, gender, or other stereotypes in advertising campaigns, including preparation of a report at reasonable cost to the company. 

Plant Closings

Federal law requires 60 days advance notice of major plant closings or layoffs.  Beyond such notice, however, many corporations provide very little in the way of support for workers losing jobs through layoffs or downsizing.  The way a company treats employees that are laid off often has a substantial impact on the morale and productivity of those that remain employed.  Programs aimed at assisting displaced workers are helpful both to those displaced and to the company’s ability to recover from market downturns or other setbacks resulting in layoffs or plant closings.

·         The Fund advisor will ordinarily support  resolutions asking companies to create or expand upon relocation programs for displaced workers.  

D.            International Operations and Human Rights

Business Activities and Investments

Global corporations often do business in countries lacking adequate legal or regulatory structures protecting workers, consumers, communities and the environment, or where lax enforcement renders existing laws ineffective.  Many companies have sought to lower costs by transferring operations to less regulated areas, or to low-wage areas.  Such activity is not always exploitative, but it can be.  In the past, transgressions of human rights in offshore operations was not well known or reported, but increasingly, company operations in countries with substandard labor or human rights records has come under much greater scrutiny.  The adverse publicity associated with allegations of sweatshop practices or other human rights abuses can also pose substantial brand or reputational risks for companies. 

Many of the shareowner resolutions filed on international operations and human rights focus on specific countries or specific issues within these countries.  For example, shareowners have asked internet and communication technology companies to report on steps being taken to seek solutions regarding free expression and privacy challenges faced by companies doing business internationally; or to report on or comply with international standards aimed at protecting human rights on a global, sectoral or country basis such as the UN Global Compact and the Voluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights. In some cases, resolutions have requested that companies report on operations and investments, or cease operations, in particular nations with repressive regimes or a history of human rights, labor abuses and/or genocide, such as Sudan or Burma.  In other cases, resolutions may oppose all company operations in a particular country; in others, the resolutions seek to limit particular industries or practices that are particularly egregious.

·         The Fund advisor will ordinarily support  proposals requesting that companies develop human rights policies and periodic reporting on operations and investments in countries with repressive regimes and/or conflict zones.

·         The Fund advisor will ordinarily support  proposals requesting a report discussing how investment policies address or could address human rights issues.

·         The Fund advisor will ordinarily support  proposals requesting that companies adopt or support reasonable third-party codes of conduct or principles addressing human rights and discrimination. 

·         The Fund advisor will ordinarily support  proposals requesting that companies develop policies and protocols to eliminate bribery and corruption.

54

 


 

 

·         The Fund advisor will ordinarily support proposals requesting a report discussing how business practices and/or products limit or could limit freedom of expression or privacy.

Unauthorized Images

Some corporations use images in their advertising or brands that are offensive to certain cultures, or that may perpetuate racism and bigotry.  For instance, some companies use American Indian symbols and imagery to advertise and market commercial products, including sports franchises. Others have used images or caricatures of African Americans, Jews, Latinos, or other minority or indigenous groups in ways that are objectionable to members of such groups.

·         The Fund advisor will support  proposals asking companies to avoid the unauthorized use of images of racial, ethnic, or indigenous groups in the promotion of their products.

International Outsourcing Operations

Shareholder resolutions are sometimes filed calling on companies to report on their operating practices in international factories and plants located in places such as the Maquiladoras in Mexico, Southeast Asia, South Asia, Eastern Europe, the Caribbean or Central America. Companies often move to these places under U.S. government-sponsored programs to promote trade and economic development in these regions.  In addition, companies have located in these regions to take advantage of lower labor costs as well as fewer environmental and other regulations. There have, however, been numerous cases of abuse of the human rights of employees and compromises of labor standards and the environmental integrity of communities.

Access to Pharmaceuticals

The cost of medicine is a serious issue throughout the world.  In the United States, many citizens lack health insurance and many more lack a prescription drug benefit under Medicare or private insurance programs.  In Africa and in many other parts of the developing world, millions of people have already died from the AIDS virus and tens of millions more are infected.  Medications to treat AIDS, malaria, tuberculosis and other diseases are often so costly as to be out of reach of most of those affected.  Shareowner resolutions are sometimes filed asking pharmaceutical companies to take steps to make drugs more accessible and affordable to victims of pandemic or epidemic disease.

·         The Fund advisor will ordinarily support  proposals asking pharmaceutical companies to take steps to make drugs more affordable and accessible for the treatment of HIV AIDS, malaria, tuberculosis and other serious diseases affecting poor countries or populations.

·         The Fund advisor will ordinarily support  proposals asking companies with operations in heavily infected areas such as Africa to ensure that their workforces receive appropriate access to counseling or healthcare advice, health care coverage, or access to treatment. 

E.            Indigenous Peoples’ Rights

Cultural Rights of Indigenous Peoples

The survival, security and human rights of millions of indigenous peoples around the world are increasingly threatened. Efforts to extract or develop natural resources in areas populated by Indigenous Peoples often threaten their lives and cultures, as well as their natural environments. Indigenous communities are demonstrating a new assertiveness when it comes to rejecting resource extraction projects. Calvert believes that to secure project access and ensure that invested assets eventually realize a return; leading companies must recognize the need to secure the free, prior and informed consent/consultation of affected indigenous communities and deliver tangible benefits to them.

55

 


 

 

·         The Fund advisor will ordinarily support  proposals requesting that companies respect the rights of and negotiate fairly with indigenous peoples, develop codes of conduct dealing with treatment of indigenous peoples, and avoid exploitation and destruction of their natural resources and ecology.

·         The Fund advisor will ordinarily support proposals requesting companies to develop, strengthen or implement a policy or guideline designed to address free, prior and informed consent/consultation from indigenous peoples or other communities.

F.            Product Safety and Impact

Many companies’ products have significant impacts on consumers, communities and society at large, and these impacts may expose companies to reputational or brand risks.  Responsible, well-governed companies should be aware of these potential risks and take proactive steps to manage them.  Shareowner proposals that ask companies to evaluate certain impacts of their products, or to provide full disclosure of the nature of those products, can be harbingers of potential risks that companies may face if they fail to act.  For example, several shareowner proposals have been filed requesting that food and beverage manufacturers label all foods containing genetically modified organisms (GMOs); other proposals have requested that companies report on the health or psychological impacts of their products.

·         The Fund advisor will review on case-by-case  basis proposals requesting that companies report on the impacts of their products on consumers and communities and will ordinarily support  such proposals when the requests can be fulfilled at reasonable cost to the company, or when potential reputational or brand risks are substantial.

·         The Fund advisor will ordinarily support  proposals requesting that companies disclose the contents or attributes of their products to potential consumers.

Toxic Chemicals

Shareowner resolutions are sometimes filed with cosmetics, household products, and retail companies asking them to report on the use of toxic chemicals in consumer products, and to provide policies regarding toxic chemicals.  Recent resolutions have focused on parabens, PVC, bromated flame retardants (BFRs), nanomaterials, and other chemicals.  In addition, some resolutions ask the company to adopt a general policy with regard to toxics in products.  These shareholder resolutions arise out of concern that many toxic chemicals may be legal to include in product formulations in the US, but not in other countries (such as the European Union)posing liability risk to the company.   In addition, independent scientists have raised serious health and safety concerns about the use of some of these chemicals.  Companies may face risk from harm to the consumer or affected communities, particularly as some of these chemicals persist in the environment.

·         The Fund advisor will ordinarily support  resolutions asking companies to disclose product ingredients.

·         The Fund advisor will ordinarily support  resolutions asking companies to disclose policies related to toxic chemicals.

·         The Fund advisor will examine and vote on a case-by-case  basis asking companies to reformulate a product by a given date, unless this reformulation is required by law in selected markets.

 

56

 


 

Animal Welfare

Shareowners and animal rights groups sometimes file resolutions with companies which engage in animal testing for the purposes of determining product efficacy or assuring consumer product safety.

·         The Fund advisor will ordinarily support  proposals seeking information on a company's animal testing practices, or requesting that management develop cost-effective alternatives to animal testing.

·         The Fund advisor will ordinarily support  proposals calling for consumer product companies to reduce or eliminate animal testing or the suffering of animal test subjects.

·         The Fund advisor will examine and vote on a case-by-case basis proposals calling for pharmaceutical or medical products firms to reduce animal testing or the suffering of animal test subjects. 

·         The Fund advisor will ordinarily support  proposals requesting that companies report to shareholders on the risks and liabilities associated with concentrated animal feeding operations unless: the company has publicly disclosed guidelines for its corporate and contract farming operations, including compliance monitoring; or the company does not directly source from confined animal feeding operations.

Tobacco

Shareowner resolutions are sometimes filed with insurance and health care companies asking them to report on the appropriateness of investments in the tobacco industry, and on the impact of smoking on benefit payments for death, disease and property loss. 

·         The Fund advisor will ordinarily support  resolutions asking companies not to invest in the stocks of tobacco companies.

·         The Fund advisor will ordinarily support  resolutions asking companies to research the impact of ceasing business transactions with the tobacco industry.

G.            Weapons Contracting

Weapons/Military Products

Shareowner resolutions may be filed with companies with significant defense contracts, asking them to report on the nature of the contracts, particularly the goods and services to be provided.

·         The Fund advisor will ordinarily support  proposals calling for reports on the type and volume of defense contracts.

H.            Community 

Equal Credit Opportunity

Access to capital is essential to full participation and opportunity in our society.  The Equal Credit Opportunity Act (ECOA) prohibits lenders from discriminating with regard to race, religion, national origin, sex, age, etc.  Shareowner resolutions are sometimes filed requesting: (1) reports on lending practices in low/moderate income or minority areas and on steps to remedy mortgage lending discrimination; (2) the development of fair lending policies that would assure access to credit for major disadvantaged groups and require reports to shareowners on the implementation of such policies; and (3) the application of ECOA standards by non-financial corporations to their financial subsidiaries.

57

 


 

 

·         The Fund advisor will ordinarily support  proposals requesting increased disclosure on ECOA and stronger policies and programs regarding compliance with ECOA. 

Redlining

Redlining is the systematic denial of services to people within a geographic area based on their economic or racial/ethnic profile.  The term originated in banking, but the same practice can occur in many businesses, including insurance and supermarkets.  Shareowner resolutions are sometimes filed asking companies to assess their lending practices or other business operations with respect to serving communities of color or the poor, and develop policies to avoid redlining. 

·         The Fund advisor will support  proposals to develop and implement policies dealing with fair lending and housing, or other nondiscriminatory business practices.

Predatory Lending

Predatory lending involves charging excessive fees to sub prime borrowers without providing adequate disclosure.  Predatory lenders can engage in abusive business practices that take advantage of the elderly or the economically disadvantaged.  This includes charging excessive fees, making loans to those unable to make interest payments and steering customers selectively to products with higher than prevailing interest rates.  Shareowner resolutions are sometimes filed asking for the development of policies to prevent predatory lending practices. 

·         The Fund advisor will support  proposals calling on companies to address and eliminate predatory lending practices.

·         The Fund advisor will support  proposals seeking the development of a policy or preparation of a report to guard against predatory lending practices.

 

Insurance Companies and Economically Targeted Investments

Economically targeted investments (ETIs) are loans made to low-to-moderate income communities or individuals to foster and promote, among other things, small businesses and farms, affordable housing and community development banks and credit unions.  At present, insurance companies put less than one-tenth of one percent of their more than $1.9 trillion in assets into ETIs.  Shareowner resolutions are sometimes filed asking for reports outlining how insurers could implement an ETI program.

·         The Fund advisor will support  proposals encouraging adoption of or participation in economically targeted investment programs that can be implemented at reasonable cost.

Healthcare

Many communities are increasingly concerned about the ability of for-profit health care institutions to provide quality health care.  Shareholders have asked corporations operating hospitals for reports on the quality of their patient care.

·         The Fund advisor will ordinarily support  resolutions that call on hospitals to submit reports on patient healthcare and details of health care practices.

58

 


 

 

I.             Political Action Committees and Political Partisanship

Shareholders have a right to know how corporate assets are being spent in furtherance of political campaigns, social causes or government lobbying activities.  Although companies are already required to make such disclosures pursuant to federal and state law, such information is often not readily available to investors and shareowners.  Moreover, corporate lobbying activities and political spending may at times be inconsistent with or actually undermine shareholder and stakeholder interests that companies are otherwise responsible to protect.

·         The Fund advisor will ordinarily support  resolutions asking companies to disclose political spending made either directly or through political action committees, trade associations and/or other advocacy associations.

·         The Fund advisor will ordinarily support  resolutions asking companies to disclose the budgets dedicated to public policy lobbying activities.

·         The Fund advisor will ordinarily support  resolutions requesting that companies support public policy activities, including lobbying or political spending that are consistent with shareholder or other stakeholder efforts to strengthen policies that protect workers, communities, the environment, public safety, or any of the other principles embodied in these Guidelines. 

J.             Other Issues

All social issues that are not covered in these Guidelines are delegated to the Fund’s advisor to vote in accordance with the Fund’s specific sustainable and socially responsible criteria.  In addition to actions taken pursuant to the Fund’s Conflict of Interest Policy, Calvert Sustainability Research Department ("CSRD") will report to the Boards on issues not covered by these Guidelines as they arise. 

 

IV. CONFLICT OF INTEREST POLICY

All Calvert Funds strictly adhere to the Guidelines detailed in Sections I and II, above. 

Thus, generally, adherence to the Global Proxy Voting Guidelines will leave little opportunity for a material conflict of interest to emerge between any of the Funds, on the one hand, and the Fund’s investment advisor, sub-advisor, principal underwriter, or an affiliated person of the Fund, on the other hand.

Nonetheless, upon the occurrence of the exercise of voting discretion where there is a variance in the vote from the Global Proxy Voting Guidelines, which could lend itself to a potential conflict between these interests, a meeting of the Audit Committee of the Fund that holds that security will be immediately convened to determine how the proxy should be voted.

 

 

Adopted September 2000

Last Revised September 2011

59

 


 

 

APPENDIX B

 

CORPORATE BOND AND COMMERCIAL PAPER RATINGS (source:  Standard & Poor's Ratings Services)

 

Bonds

AAA:     An obligation rated AAA has the highest rating assigned by Standard & Poor's.  The obligor's capacity to meet its financial commitment on the obligation is extremely strong.

AA:        An obligation rated AA differs from the highest-rated obligations only in a small degree.  The obligor's capacity to meet its financial commitment on the obligation is very strong.

A:            An obligation rated A carries elements which may cause the obligation to be more susceptible to the adverse effects of changes in circumstances and economic conditions.

BBB:       An obligation rated BBB exhibits adequate protection parameters but may be susceptible to adverse changes in economic conditions or changing circumstances which are likely to lead to a weakened capacity for the obligor to meet its financial commitment on the obligation.

BB, B, CCC, CC and C:  These obligations are regarded as having significant speculative characteristics.  BB indicates the lowest degree of speculation and C the highest.  While such obligations will likely have some quality and protective characteristics, these factors are outweighed by large uncertainties and/or major exposures to adverse conditions.

BB:          An obligation rated BB is less vulnerable to nonpayment than other speculative issues, however this type of obligation is subject to major ongoing uncertainties and/or exposure to adverse business, financial, or economic conditions which could result in the obligor's inability to meet its financial commitment on the obligation.

B:            An obligation rated B is more vulnerable to nonpayment than obligations rated BB, but the obligor currently has the capacity meet its financial commitment on the obligations.  Adverse business, financial, and/or economic conditions may impair the obligor's capacity or willingness to meet its financial commitment on the obligation.

CCC:       An obligation rated CCC is currently vulnerable to nonpayment and is dependent upon favorable business, financial and economic conditions in order to sustain its ability to meet its financial commitment on the obligation.  Should adverse business, financial and/or economic conditions occur, the obligor is not likely to have the capacity to meet its financial commitment on the obligation.

CC:          An obligation rated CC is currently highly vulnerable to nonpayment.

C:            An obligation rated C is often associated with situations in which a bankruptcy petition has been filed or  where similar action has been taken but payment on the obligation is being continued.

D:            An obligation rated D is in payment default.  The D rating is used when interest payments or principal payments are not made on the date due even if the applicable grace period has not expired, unless Standard & Poor's believes that such payments will be made during such grace period.  The D rating also will be used when a bankruptcy petition has been filed or other similar action when payments on the obligation are deemed to be jeopardized.

 

Note:  Ratings from “AA” to “CCC” may be modified by the addition of a plus (+) or minus (-) sign to show relative standing within the major rating categories.

 

Notes

SP-1: These issues are considered as having a strong capacity to pay principal and interest.  Those issues determined to possess overwhelming safety characteristics are denoted with a plus sign (+) designation.

SP-2:  These issues are considered as having a satisfactory capacity to pay principal and interest.

SP-3:  These issues are considered as having a speculative capacity to pay principal and interest.

 

60

 


 

 

Commercial Paper

 

A-1:  This rating indicates a strong degree of safety regarding timely payment.  Those issues determined to possess extremely strong safety characteristics are denoted with a plus sign (+) designation.

A-2: This rating indicates a satisfactory degree of safety regarding timely payment.

A-3: This rating indicates that the issue carries an adequate capacity for timely payment, however it is more vulnerable to the adverse effects of changes in circumstances than those obligations with higher ratings.

 

Long-Term Obligation Ratings (source: Moody's Investors Service)

                Moody's long-term obligation ratings are opinions of the relative credit risk of fixed-income obligations with an original maturity of one year or more.  They address the possibility that a financial obligation will not be honored as promised.  Such ratings reflect both the likelihood of default and any financial loss suffered in the event of default.

 

Aaa:        Obligations rated Aaa are judged to be of the highest quality, with minimal credit risk.

Aa:          Obligations rated Aa are judged to be of high quality and are subject to very low credit risk.

A:            Obligations rated A are considered upper-medium grade and are subject to low credit risk.

Baa:        Obligations rated Baa are subject to moderate credit risk.  They are considered medium-grade and   

                may possess certain speculative characteristics.

Ba:          Obligations rated Ba are judged to have speculative elements and are subject to substantial credit risk.

B:            Obligations rated B are considered speculative and are subject to high credit risk.

Caa:        Obligations rated Caa are judged to be of poor standing and are subject to very high credit risk.

Ca:          Obligations rated Ca are highly speculative and are likely in, or very near, default, with some prospect of recovery of principal and interest.

C:            Obligations rated C are the lowest rated class of bonds and are typically in default, with little prospect for recovery of principal or interest.

 

Note:  Moody's appends numerical modifiers 1, 2, and 3 to each generic rating classification from Aa through Caa.  The modifier 1 indicates that the obligation ranks in the higher end of its generic rating category; the modifier 2 indicates a mid-range ranking; and the modifier 3 indicates a ranking in the lower end of that generic rating category.

 

Short-Term Ratings (source: Moody's Investors Service)

 

Moody's short-term ratings are opinions of the ability of issuers to honor short-term financial obligations.  Ratings may be assigned to issuers, short-term programs or to individual short-term debt instruments.  Such obligations generally have an original maturity not exceeding thirteen months, unless explicitly noted.

Moody's employs the following designations to indicate the relative repayment ability of rated issuers:

 

P-1:         Issuers (or supporting institutions) rated Prime-1 have a superior ability to repay short-term debt obligations.

P-2:         Issuers (or supporting institutions) rated Prime-2 have a strong ability to repay short-term debt obligations.

P-3:         Issuers (or supporting institutions) rated Prime-3 have an acceptable ability to repay short-term obligations.

NP:          Issuers (or supporting institutions) rated Not Prime do not fall within any of the Prime rating categories.

 

Note:  Canadian issuers rated P-1 or P-2 have their short-term ratings enhanced by the senior-most long-term rating of the issuer, its guarantor or support-provider.

 

 

 

PART C - OTHER INFORMATION

Item 28. Exhibits

(a)

Articles of Incorporation of Summit Mutual Funds, Inc., incorporated by reference to Registrant's initial filing on April 3, 1984.
Articles of Amendment of Summit Mutual Funds, Inc., incorporated by reference to Registrant's Post-Effective Amendment No. 69, April 29, 2010, accession number 0000743773-10-000011.

 

 

(b)

By-laws of Calvert Variable Products, Inc., filed herewith.

 

 

(c)

Instruments Defining Rights of Security Holders (not applicable).

 

 

(d)(1)

Investment Advisory Agreement with Calvert Investment Management, Inc., incorporated by reference to Registrant's Post-Effective Amendment No. 65, January 30, 2009, accession number 0000743773-09-000003.  Addendum to Investment Advisory Agreement, incorporated by reference to Registrant's Post-Effective Amendment No. 74, April 27, 2012, accession number 0000743773-12-000004. Addendum to the Investment Advisory Agreement, filed herewith. Amendment to Investment Advisory Agreement, filed herewith. Schedule A and B to Investment Advisory Agreement, filed herewith.

 

 

(d)(2)

Form of Investment Subadvisory Agreement with Ameritas Investment Partners, Inc., filed herewith.

 

 

(d)(3)

Investment Subadvisory Agreement with World Asset Management, Inc., incorporated by reference to Registrant's Post-Effective Amendment No. 65, January 30, 2009, accession number 0000743773-09-000003.

 

 

(d)(4)

Form of Investment Subadvisory Agreement with Milliman Financial Risk Management LLC, filed herewith.

 

 

(e)

Underwriting (Distribution) Agreement, incorporated by reference to Registrant's Post-Effective Amendment No. 65, January 30, 2009, accession number 0000743773-09-000003. Amendment to Underwriting (Distribution) Agreement, incorporated by reference to Registrant’s Post-Effective Amendment No. 74, April 27, 2012, accession number 0000743773-12-000004. Amendment to Underwriting Agreement, filed herewith.

 

 

(f)

Form of Trustees' Deferred Compensation Agreement, filed herewith.

 

 

(g)

Master Custodian Agreement, incorporated by reference to Registrant's Post-Effective Amendment No. 65, January 30, 2009, accession number 0000743773-09-000003. Amended Appendix A to Master Custodian Agreement, incorporated by reference to Registrant's Post-Effective Amendment No. 65, January 30, 2009, accession number 0000743773-09-000003. Form of Amendment to the Master Custodian Agreement, filed herewith.

 

 

(h)(1)

Master Transfer Agency and Service Agreement, incorporated by reference to Registrant's Post-Effective Amendment No. 65, January 30, 2009, accession number 0000743773-09-000003. Amended Schedule A to Master Transfer Agency and Service Agreement, incorporated by reference to Registrant's Post-Effective Amendment No. 65, January 30, 2009, accession number 0000743773-09-000003. Form of Amendment to the Master Transfer Agency and Service Agreement, filed herewith.

 

 

(h)(2)

Amended and Restated Servicing Agreement, incorporated by reference to Registrant's initial N-14 filing, dated December 17, 2012, accession number 0000743773-12-000029. Amendment to the Amended and Restated Servicing Agreement, filed herewith.

 

 

(h)(3)

Administrative Services Agreement, incorporated by reference to Registrant's Post-Effective Amendment No. 65, January 30, 2009, accession number 0000743773-09-000003.
Schedule A to Administrative Services Agreement, incorporated by reference to Registrant's Post-Effective Amendment No. 70, April 27, 2011, accession number 0000743773-11-000009. Amendment to Administrative Services Agreement, incorporated by reference to Registrant’s Post-Effective Amendment No. 74, April 27, 2012, accession number 0000743773-12-000004. Amendment to the Administrative Services Agreement, filed herewith.

 

 

(i)

Opinion and Consent of Counsel, filed herewith.

 

 

(j)

Consent of Independent Auditors to use of Report (not applicable).

 

 

(k)

Omitted Financial Statements (not applicable).

 

 

(l)

Letter regarding initial capital, incorporated by reference to Registrant's Pre-Effective Amendment No. 1, filed on July 2, 1984.

 

 

(m)

Form of Amended and Restated 12b-1 Distribution and Shareholder Service Plan, filed herewith.

 

 

(n)

Amended and Restated Rule 18f-3 Multiple Class Plan, incorporated by reference to Registrant’s Post-Effective Amendment No. 74, April 27, 2012, accession number 0000743773-12-000004. Amendment to Amended and Restated 18f-3 Multiple Class Plan, filed herewith.

 

 

(o)

Not applicable.

 

 

(p)(1)

Code of Ethics for Calvert Investment Management Company Inc., incorporated by reference to Registrant's initial N-14 filing, dated December 17, 2012, accession number 0000743773-12-000029.

 

 

(p)(2)

Code of Ethics for Ameritas Investment Partners, Inc., filed herewith.

 

 

(p)(3)

Code of Ethics for World Asset Management, Inc., incorporated by reference to Registrant's Post-Effective Amendment No. 65, January 30, 2009, accession number 0000743773-09-000003.

 

 

(p)(4)

Code of Ethics for Milliman Financial Risk Management LLC, filed herewith.

 

 

(q)

Power of Attorney forms, filed herewith.

 


 

Item 29. Persons Controlled by or Under Common Control with Registrant

                  Not applicable.

Item 30. Indemnification

Registrant's By-Laws, Item 28(b) of this Registration Statement, provides, in summary, that officers and trustees/directors shall be indemnified by Registrant against liabilities and expenses incurred by such persons in connection with actions, suits, or proceedings arising out of their offices or duties of employment, except that no indemnification can be made to such a person if he has been adjudged liable of willful misfeasance, bad faith, gross negligence, or reckless disregard of his duties. In the absence of such an adjudication, the determination of eligibility for indemnification shall be made by independent counsel in a written opinion or by the vote of a majority of a quorum of trustees/directors who are neither "interested persons" of Registrant, as that term is defined in Section 2(a)(19) of the Investment Company Act of 1940, nor parties to the proceeding.

Registrant may purchase and maintain liability insurance on behalf of any officer, trustee, director, employee or agent against any liabilities arising from such status. In this regard, Registrant will maintain a Trustees/Directors & Officers (Partners) Liability Insurance Policy with Chubb Group of Insurance Companies, 15 Mountain View Road, Warren, New Jersey 07061, providing Registrant with $10 million in trustees/directors and officers liability coverage (the “First Tier Liability Coverage”), plus $5 million in excess trustees/directors and officers liability coverage for the independent trustees/directors only. Registrant also maintains an additional Trustees & Officers (Partners) Liability Insurance Policy with Travelers Companies, Inc. Financial and Professional Services, 1500 MarketStreet, West Tower, 29th Floor, Philadelphia, PA 19102, providing a further $10 million in trustees and officers liability coverage.  Registrant also maintains a $13 million Investment Company Blanket Bond issued by ICI Mutual Insurance Company, P.O. Box 730, Burlington, Vermont, 05402 (the “Fidelity Bond”). The Fund maintains joint coverage with the other Calvert Group Funds, and for the First Tier Liability Coverage and the Fidelity Bond, with the Advisor and its affiliated companies.  The premium and the coverage are allocated based on a method approved by the disinterested Fund trustees/directors.

Item 31. Business and other Connections of Investment Adviser

Name

Name of Company, Principal Business and Address

Capacity

Barbara J. Krumsiek

 

 

 

First Variable Rate Fund for Government Income
Calvert Tax-Free Reserves
Calvert Social Investment Fund
Calvert Cash Reserves
The Calvert Fund
Calvert Social Index Series, Inc.
Calvert Impact Fund, Inc.
Calvert Variable Series, Inc.
Calvert World Values Fund, Inc.
Calvert SAGE Fund
Calvert Variable Products, Inc.
  Investment Companies
4550 Montgomery Avenue
Bethesda, Maryland 20814

Officer,
Trustee/
Director

 

 

 

 

Calvert Investment Management, Inc.
Investment Advisor
4550 Montgomery Avenue
Bethesda, Maryland 20814

Officer
and
Director

 

 

 

 

Calvert Investments, Inc.
Holding Company
4550 Montgomery Avenue
Bethesda, Maryland 20814

Officer
and
Director

 

 

 

 

Calvert Investment Services, Inc.
Shareholder Servicing Agent
4550 Montgomery Avenue
Bethesda, Maryland 20814

Officer
and
Director

 

 

 

 

Calvert Investment Administrative Services, Inc.
Service Company
4550 Montgomery Avenue
Bethesda, Maryland 20814

Officer
and
Director

 

 

 

 

Calvert Investment Distributors, Inc.
Broker-Dealer
4550 Montgomery Avenue
Bethesda, Maryland 20814

Officer
and
Director

 

 

 

Ronald M. Wolfsheimer

 

 

 

First Variable Rate Fund for Government Income
Calvert Tax-Free Reserves
Calvert Social Investment Fund
Calvert Cash Reserves
The Calvert Fund
Calvert Social Index Series, Inc.
Calvert Impact Fund, Inc.
Calvert Variable Series, Inc.
Calvert World Values Fund, Inc.
Calvert SAGE Fund
Calvert Variable Products, Inc.
  Investment Companies
4550 Montgomery Avenue
Bethesda, Maryland 20814

Officer

 

 

 

 

Calvert Investment Management, Inc.
Investment Advisor
4550 Montgomery Avenue
Bethesda, Maryland 20814

Officer

 

 

 

 

Calvert Investments, Inc.
Holding Company
4550 Montgomery Avenue
Bethesda, Maryland 20814

Officer

 

 

 

 

Calvert Investment Services, Inc.
Shareholder Servicing Agent
4550 Montgomery Avenue
Bethesda, Maryland 20814

Officer

 

 

 

 

Calvert Investment Administrative Services, Inc.
Service Company
4550 Montgomery Avenue
Bethesda, Maryland 20814

Officer
and
Director

 

 

 

 

Calvert Investment Distributors, Inc.
Broker-Dealer
4550 Montgomery Avenue
Bethesda, Maryland 20814

Officer
and
Director

 

 

 

William M. Tartikoff

 

 

 

First Variable Rate Fund for Government Income
Calvert Tax-Free Reserves
Calvert Social Investment Fund
Calvert Cash Reserves
The Calvert Fund
Calvert Social Index Series, Inc.
Calvert Impact Fund, Inc.
Calvert Variable Series, Inc.
Calvert World Values Fund, Inc.
Calvert SAGE Fund
Calvert Variable Products, Inc.
  Investment Companies
4550 Montgomery Avenue
Bethesda, Maryland 20814

Officer

 

 

 

 

Calvert Investments, Inc.
Holding Company
4550 Montgomery Avenue
Bethesda, Maryland 20814

Officer

 

 

 

 

Calvert Investment Administrative Services, Inc.
Service Company
4550 Montgomery Avenue
Bethesda, Maryland 20814

Officer

 

 

 

 

Calvert Investment Management, Inc.
Investment Advisor
4550 Montgomery Avenue
Bethesda, Maryland 20814

Officer

 

 

 

 

Calvert Investment Services, Inc.
Shareholder Servicing Agent
4550 Montgomery Avenue
Bethesda, Maryland 20814

Officer

 

 

 

 

Calvert Investment Distributors, Inc.
Broker-Dealer
4550 Montgomery Avenue
Bethesda, Maryland 20814

Officer

 

 

 

Susan Walker Bender

 

 

 

Calvert Investments, Inc.
Holding Company
4550 Montgomery Avenue
Bethesda, Maryland 20814

Officer

 

 

 

 

Calvert Investment Administrative Services, Inc.
Service Company
4550 Montgomery Avenue
Bethesda, Maryland 20814

Officer

 

 

 

 

Calvert Investment Management, Inc.
Investment Advisor
4550 Montgomery Avenue
Bethesda, Maryland 20814

Officer

 

 

 

 

Calvert Investment Services, Inc.
Shareholder Servicing Agent
4550 Montgomery Avenue
Bethesda, Maryland 20814

Officer

 

 

 

 

Calvert Investment Distributors, Inc.
Broker-Dealer
4550 Montgomery Avenue
Bethesda, Maryland 20814

Officer

 

 

 

 

First Variable Rate Fund for Government Income
Calvert Tax-Free Reserves
Calvert Social Investment Fund
Calvert Cash Reserves
The Calvert Fund
Calvert Social Index Series, Inc.
Calvert Impact Fund, Inc.
Calvert Variable Series, Inc.
Calvert World Values Fund, Inc.
Calvert SAGE Fund
Calvert Variable Products, Inc.
  Investment Companies
4550 Montgomery Avenue
Bethesda, Maryland 20814

Officer

 

 

 

Ivy Wafford Duke

 

 

 

Calvert Investments, Inc.
Holding Company
4550 Montgomery Avenue
Bethesda, Maryland 20814

Officer

 

 

 

 

Calvert Investment Administrative Services, Inc.
Service Company
4550 Montgomery Avenue
Bethesda, Maryland 20814

Officer

 

 

 

 

Calvert Investment Management, Inc.
Investment Advisor
4550 Montgomery Avenue
Bethesda, Maryland 20814

Officer

 

 

 

 

Calvert Investment Services, Inc.
Shareholder Servicing Agent
4550 Montgomery Avenue
Bethesda, Maryland 20814

Officer

 

 

 

 

Calvert Investment Distributors, Inc.
Broker-Dealer
4550 Montgomery Avenue
Bethesda, Maryland 20814

Officer

 

 

 

 

First Variable Rate Fund for Government Income
Calvert Tax-Free Reserves
Calvert Social Investment Fund
Calvert Cash Reserves
The Calvert Fund
Calvert Social Index Series, Inc.
Calvert Impact Fund, Inc.
Calvert Variable Series, Inc.
Calvert World Values Fund, Inc.
Calvert SAGE Fund
Calvert Variable Products, Inc.
  Investment Companies
4550 Montgomery Avenue
Bethesda, Maryland 20814

Officer

 

 

 

Lancelot King

 

 

 

Calvert Investments, Inc.
Holding Company
4550 Montgomery Avenue
Bethesda, Maryland 20814

Officer

 

 

 

 

Calvert Investment Administrative Services, Inc.
Service Company
4550 Montgomery Avenue
Bethesda, Maryland 20814

Officer

 

 

 

 

Calvert Investment Management, Inc.
Investment Advisor
4550 Montgomery Avenue
Bethesda, Maryland 20814

Officer

 

 

 

 

Calvert Investment Services, Inc.
Shareholder Servicing Agent
4550 Montgomery Avenue
Bethesda, Maryland 20814

Officer

 

 

 

 

Calvert Investment Distributors, Inc.
Broker-Dealer
4550 Montgomery Avenue
Bethesda, Maryland 20814

Officer

 

 

 

 

First Variable Rate Fund for Government Income
Calvert Tax-Free Reserves
Calvert Social Investment Fund
Calvert Cash Reserves
The Calvert Fund
Calvert Social Index Series, Inc.
Calvert Impact Fund, Inc.
Calvert Variable Series, Inc.
Calvert World Values Fund, Inc.
Calvert SAGE Fund
Calvert Variable Products, Inc.
  Investment Companies
4550 Montgomery Avenue
Bethesda, Maryland 20814

Officer

 

 

 

Andrew Niebler

 

 

 

Calvert Investments, Inc.
Holding Company
4550 Montgomery Avenue
Bethesda, Maryland 20814

Officer

 

 

 

 

Calvert Investment Administrative Services, Inc.
Service Company
4550 Montgomery Avenue
Bethesda, Maryland 20814

Officer

 

 

 

 

Calvert Investment Management, Inc.
Investment Advisor
4550 Montgomery Avenue
Bethesda, Maryland 20814

Officer

 

 

 

 

Calvert Investment Services, Inc.
Shareholder Servicing Agent
4550 Montgomery Avenue
Bethesda, Maryland 20814

Officer

 

 

 

 

Calvert Investment Distributors, Inc.
Broker-Dealer
4550 Montgomery Avenue
Bethesda, Maryland 20814

Officer

 

 

 

 

First Variable Rate Fund for Government Income
Calvert Tax-Free Reserves
Calvert Social Investment Fund
Calvert Cash Reserves
The Calvert Fund
Calvert Social Index Series, Inc.
Calvert Impact Fund, Inc.
Calvert Variable Series, Inc.
Calvert World Values Fund, Inc.
Calvert SAGE Fund
Calvert Variable Products, Inc.
  Investment Companies
4550 Montgomery Avenue
Bethesda, Maryland 20814

Officer

 

 

 

Augusto Macedo

 

 

 

Calvert Investments, Inc.
Holding Company
4550 Montgomery Avenue
Bethesda, Maryland 20814

Officer

 

 

 

 

Calvert Investment Administrative Services, Inc.
Service Company
4550 Montgomery Avenue
Bethesda, Maryland 20814

Officer

 

 

 

 

Calvert Investment Management, Inc.
Investment Advisor
4550 Montgomery Avenue
Bethesda, Maryland 20814

Officer

 

 

 

 

Calvert Investment Services, Inc.
Shareholder Servicing Agent
4550 Montgomery Avenue
Bethesda, Maryland 20814

Officer

 

 

 

 

Calvert Investment Distributors, Inc.
Broker-Dealer
4550 Montgomery Avenue
Bethesda, Maryland 20814

Officer

 

 

 

 

First Variable Rate Fund for Government Income
Calvert Tax-Free Reserves
Calvert Social Investment Fund
Calvert Cash Reserves
The Calvert Fund
Calvert Social Index Series, Inc.
Calvert Impact Fund, Inc.
Calvert Variable Series, Inc.
Calvert World Values Fund, Inc.
Calvert SAGE Fund
Calvert Variable Products, Inc.
  Investment Companies
4550 Montgomery Avenue
Bethesda, Maryland 20814

Officer

 

 

 

Catherine Roy

 

 

 

Calvert Investment Management, Inc.
Investment Advisor
4550 Montgomery Avenue
Bethesda, Maryland 20814

Officer
and
Director

 

 

 

 

First Variable Rate Fund for
Government Income
Calvert Tax-Free Reserves
Calvert Social Investment Fund
Calvert Cash Reserves
The Calvert Fund
Calvert Social Index Series, Inc.
Calvert Impact Fund, Inc.
Calvert Variable Series, Inc.
Calvert World Values Fund, Inc.
Calvert SAGE Fund
Calvert Variable Products, Inc.
  Investment Companies
4550 Montgomery Avenue
Bethesda, Maryland 20814

Officer

 

 

 

Bennett Freeman

 

 

 

Calvert Investments, Inc.
Holding Company
4550 Montgomery Avenue
Bethesda, Maryland 20814

Officer

 

 

 

 

Calvert Investment Management, Inc.
Investment Advisor
4550 Montgomery Avenue
Bethesda, Maryland 20814

Officer

 

 

 

Stu Dalheim

 

 

 

Calvert Investment Management, Inc.
Investment Advisor
4550 Montgomery Avenue
Bethesda, Maryland 20814

Officer

 

 

 

Hui Ping Ho

 

 

 

First Variable Rate Fund for Government Income
Calvert Tax-Free Reserves
Calvert Social Investment Fund
Calvert Cash Reserves
The Calvert Fund
Calvert Social Index Series, Inc.
Calvert Impact Fund, Inc.
Calvert Variable Series, Inc.
Calvert World Values Fund, Inc.
Calvert SAGE Fund
Calvert Variable Products, Inc.
  Investment Companies
4550 Montgomery Avenue
Bethesda, Maryland 20814

Officer

 

 

 

Patrick Faul

 

 

 

Calvert Investment Management, Inc.
Investment Advisor
4550 Montgomery Avenue
Bethesda, Maryland 20814

Officer

Natalie Trunow

 

 

 

Calvert Investment Management, Inc.
Investment Advisor
4550 Montgomery Avenue
Bethesda, Maryland 20814

Officer
and
Director

 

 

 

 

First Variable Rate Fund for Government Income
Calvert Tax-Free Reserves
Calvert Social Investment Fund
Calvert Cash Reserves
The Calvert Fund
Calvert Social Index Series, Inc.
Calvert Impact Fund, Inc.
Calvert Variable Series, Inc.
Calvert World Values Fund, Inc.
Calvert SAGE Fund
Calvert Variable Products, Inc.
  Investment Companies
4550 Montgomery Avenue
Bethesda, Maryland 20814

Officer

 

 

 

James McGlynn

 

 

 

Calvert Investment Management, Inc.
Investment Advisor
4550 Montgomery Avenue
Bethesda, Maryland 20814

Officer

 

 

 

John Nichols

 

 

 

Calvert Investment Management, Inc.
Investment Advisor
4550 Montgomery Avenue
Bethesda, Maryland 20814

Officer

 

 

 

  Michael Abramo

 

Calvert Investment Management, Inc.
Investment Advisor
4550 Montgomery Avenue
Bethesda, Maryland 20814

Officer

Matthew Duch

 

 

 

Calvert Investment Management, Inc.
Investment Advisor
4550 Montgomery Avenue
Bethesda, Maryland 20814

Officer

 

 

 

Thomas Dailey

 

 

 

Calvert Investment Management, Inc.
Investment Advisor
4550 Montgomery Avenue
Bethesda, Maryland 20814

Officer

 

 

 

 

First Variable Rate Fund for Government Income
Calvert Tax-Free Reserves
Calvert Social Investment Fund
Calvert Cash Reserves
The Calvert Fund
Calvert Variable Series, Inc.
Calvert Variable Products, Inc.
  Investment Companies
4550 Montgomery Avenue
Bethesda, Maryland 20814

Officer

 

 

 

Robert Enderson

 

 

 

Calvert Investments, Inc.
Holding Company
4550 Montgomery Avenue
Bethesda, Maryland 20814

Officer

 

 

 

 

Calvert Investment Administrative Services, Inc.
Service Company
4550 Montgomery Avenue
Bethesda, Maryland 20814

Officer

 

 

 

 

Calvert Investment Management, Inc.
Investment Advisor
4550 Montgomery Avenue
Bethesda, Maryland 20814

Officer

 

 

 

 

Calvert Investment Services, Inc.
Shareholder Servicing Agent
4550 Montgomery Avenue
Bethesda, Maryland 20814

Officer

 

 

 

 

Calvert Investment Distributors, Inc.
Broker-Dealer
4550 Montgomery Avenue
Bethesda, Maryland 20814

Officer

 


 

 Item 32.Principal Underwriters

         (a)     Registrant's principal underwriter underwrites shares of the following investment companies other than Registrant:

First Variable Rate Fund for Government Income
Calvert Tax-Free Reserves
Calvert Social Investment Fund
Calvert Cash Reserves
The Calvert Fund
Calvert World Values Fund, Inc.
Calvert Social Index Series, Inc.
Calvert Variable Series, Inc.
Calvert Impact Fund, Inc.
Calvert SAGE Fund

         (b)     Positions of Underwriter's Officers and Directors

Name and Principal Business Address*

Position(s) and Offices
with Underwriter

Position(s) and Offices
with Registrant

Barbara J. Krumsiek

Director and Chief Executive
Officer

Trustee and President

Ronald M. Wolfsheimer

Director, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial and Administrative Officer

Treasurer

William M. Tartikoff

Senior Vice President and
Secretary

Vice President and Secretary

   Lynne Ford

  Executive Vice President

  None

Alison Smith

Senior Vice President – Strategic Projects, Risk Management and Chief Information Officer

None

Stan Young

Vice President – Client Services

None

Robert Enderson

Vice President

None

Christine Teske

Senior Institutional Vice President

None

Jackie Zelenko

Vice President

None

Matthew Alsted

Vice President

None

Geoffrey Ashton

Senior Regional Vice President

None

Bill Hairgrove

Regional Vice President

None

Marc DiFilippo

Regional Vice President

None

Todd Dahlstrom

Regional Vice President

None

Anthony Eames

Senior Vice President, Head of Wholesale Distribution

None

Steve Himber

Senior Institutional Vice President

None

Dave Mazza

Vice President, Institutional Sales

None

Ben Ogbogu

Regional Vice President

None

Steve Yoon

Regional Vice President

None

David McClellan

Regional Vice President

None

Neil Orlofske

Regional Vice President

None

Lenore Reiner

Regional Vice President

None

Susan Walker Bender

Assistant Vice President, Assistant Secretary,
and Associate General Counsel

Assistant Secretary
and Assistant Vice President

Ivy Wafford Duke

Assistant Vice President, Assistant Secretary, Deputy General Counsel and Chief Compliance Officer – Calvert Investment Distributors, Inc.

Assistant Secretary
and Assistant Vice President

Lancelot King

Assistant Vice President, Assistant Secretary
and Associate General Counsel

Assistant Secretary
and Assistant Vice President

Andrew Niebler

Assistant Vice President, Assistant Secretary
and Associate General Counsel

Assistant Secretary and
Assistant Vice President

Augusto Macedo

Assistant Vice President, Assistant Secretary and Assistant General Counsel – Compliance

Assistant Secretary
and Assistant Vice President

Hui Ping Ho

Assistant Treasurer

Assistant Treasurer

 

 

         * 4550 Montgomery Avenue Bethesda, Maryland 20814

         (c)      Inapplicable.

 

Item 33. Location of Accounts and Records

         Ronald M. Wolfsheimer, Treasurer
         and
         William M. Tartikoff, Secretary
         Calvert Variable Products, Inc.
         4550 Montgomery Avenue, Suite 1000N
         Bethesda, Maryland 20814

 

Item 34. Management Services

         Not Applicable

 

Item 35.Undertakings

         Not Applicable

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, the Registrant certifies that it meets all of the requirements for effectiveness of this registration statement under Rule 485(a)(2) under the Securities Act and has duly caused this registration statement to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, duly authorized, in the City of Bethesda, and State of Maryland on the 5th day of February, 2013.

CALVERT VARIABLE PRODUCTS, INC.

By:

_______________**__________________
Barbara J. Krumsiek
Director and Chairperson

 


 

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, this Registration Statement has been signed below on the 5th  day of February 2013, by the following persons in the capacities indicated.

Signature

Title

__________**____________
Barbara J. Krumsiek

Director and Chairperson

 

 

__________**____________
Ronald M. Wolfsheimer

Treasurer

 

 

__________**____________
Frank H. Blatz, Jr.

Director

 

 

__________**____________
Arthur J. Pugh

Director

 

 

__________**____________
Alice Gresham Bullock

Director

 

 

__________**____________
M. Charito Kruvant

Director

 

 

__________**_____________
Cynthia H. Milligan

Director

 

 

__________**____________
William Lester

Director

 

 

**By: /s/ Andrew K. Niebler
                 Andrew K. Niebler

Executed by Andrew K. Niebler, Attorney-in-fact on behalf of those indicated, pursuant to Power of Attorney Forms, filed herewith.

 

Calvert Variable Products, Inc.
Post-Effective Amendment No. 75
Registration No. 002-90309
EXHIBIT INDEX

Exhibit No.

Description

28(b)

By-Laws of Calvert Variable Products, Inc.

28(d)(1)

Addendum to the Investment Advisory Agreement

28(d)(1)

Amendment to Investment Advisory Agreement

28(d)(1)

Schedule A and B to Investment Advisory Agreement

28(d)(2)

Form of Investment Subadvisory Agreement with Ameritas Investment Partners, Inc.

28(d)(4)

Form of Investment Subadvisory Agreement with Milliman Financial Risk Management LLC

28(e)

Amendment to Underwriting Agreement

28(f)

Form of Trustees’ Deferred Compensation Agreement

28(g)

Form of Amendment to the Master Custodian Agreement

28(h)(1)

Form of Amendment to the Master Transfer Agency and Service Agreement

28(h)(2)

Amendment to the Amended and Restated Servicing Agreement

28(h)(3)

Amendment to the Administrative Services Agreement

28(i)

Opinion and Consent of Counsel

28(m)

Form of Amended and Restated 12b-1 Distribution and Shareholder Service Plan

28(n)

Amendment to Amended and Restated 18f-3 Multiple Class Plan

28(p)(2)

Code of Ethics for Ameritas Investment Partners, Inc.

28(p)(4)

Code of Ethics for Milliman Financial Risk Management LLC

28(q)

Power of Attorney forms

 


 

Dates Referenced Herein   and   Documents Incorporated by Reference

This ‘485APOS’ Filing    Date    Other Filings
4/30/14485BPOS,  PX14A6G
4/30/13485BPOS,  497K,  PX14A6G
4/22/13
3/31/13N-Q
Filed on:2/5/13
12/31/1224F-2NT,  N-CSR,  NSAR-B
12/17/12N-14
4/27/12485BPOS
4/27/11485BPOS
4/29/10485BPOS
1/30/09485BPOS
 List all Filings 
Top
Filing Submission 0000743773-13-000005   –   Alternative Formats (Word / Rich Text, HTML, Plain Text, et al.)

Copyright © 2024 Fran Finnegan & Company LLC – All Rights Reserved.
AboutPrivacyRedactionsHelp — Mon., Apr. 29, 6:24:29.2am ET