Annual Report — Form 10-K
Filing Table of Contents
Document/Exhibit Description Pages Size
1: 10-K Annual Report 8± 34K
3: EX-33 ABS - Report of Compliance with Servicing Criteria 8± 35K
4: EX-33 ABS - Report of Compliance with Servicing Criteria 9± 52K
5: EX-33 ABS - Report of Compliance with Servicing Criteria 2± 14K
6: EX-33 ABS - Report of Compliance with Servicing Criteria 2± 12K
7: EX-34 ABS - Attestation Report on Assessment of 2± 11K
Compliance with Servicing Criteria
8: EX-34 ABS - Attestation Report on Assessment of 2± 13K
Compliance with Servicing Criteria
9: EX-34 ABS - Attestation Report on Assessment of 2± 14K
Compliance with Servicing Criteria
10: EX-34 ABS - Attestation Report on Assessment of 2± 11K
Compliance with Servicing Criteria
11: EX-35 ABS - Servicer Compliance Statement 5± 28K
12: EX-35 ABS - Servicer Compliance Statement 7± 28K
2: EX-31 Certification -- Sarbanes-Oxley Act - Sect. 302 1 9K
EX-34 — ABS – Attestation Report on Assessment of Compliance with Servicing Criteria
EX-34.2
(logo) KPMG
KPMG LLP
2500 Ruan Center
666 Grand Avenue
Des Moines, IA 50309
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.:
We have examined management's assessment, included in the accompanying 2007
Certification Regarding Compliance with Applicable Servicing Criteria, that
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (the Company) complied with the servicing criteria
set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission's
Regulation AB for its primary servicing of residential mortgage loans by its
Wells Fargo Home Mortgage division, other than the servicing of such loans
for Freddie Mac, Fannie Mae, Ginnie Mae, state and local bond programs, or a
Federal Home Loan Bank (the Platform), except for servicing criteria
1122(d)(1)(iii) and 1122(d)(4)(xv), which the Company has determined are not
applicable to the activities it performs with respect to the Platform, as of
and for the year ended December 31, 2007. Management is responsible for the
Company's compliance with those servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to
express an opinion on management's assessment about the Company's compliance
based on our examination.
Our examination was conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public
Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included
examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the
servicing criteria specified above and performing such other procedures as we
considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing
selected asset-backed transactions and securities that comprise the Platform,
testing selected servicing activities related to the Platform, and determining
whether the Company processed those selected transactions and performed those
selected activities in compliance with the servicing criteria. Furthermore, our
procedures were limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities
performed by the Company during the period covered by this report. Our
procedures were not designed to determine whether errors may have occurred
either prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances
or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by
this report for the selected transactions or any other transactions. We
believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our
examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company's compliance
with the servicing criteria.
As described in the accompanying 2007 Certification Regarding Compliance with
Applicable Servicing Criteria, for servicing criteria 1122(d)(2)(i),
1122(d)(2)(vi), 1122(d)(4)(iv), 1122(d)(4)(xi), and 1122(d)(4)(xiii), the
Company has engaged various vendors to perform the activities required by
these servicing criteria. The Company has determined that none of these vendors
is considered a "servicer" as defined in Item 1101(j) of Regulation AB, and the
Company has elected to take responsibility for assessing compliance with the
servicing criteria applicable to each vendor as permitted by Interpretation
17.06 of the SEC Division of Corporation Finance Manual of Publicly Available
Telephone Interpretations ("Interpretation 17.06"). As permitted by
Interpretation 17.06, the Company has asserted that it has policies and
procedures in place designed to provide reasonable assurance that the vendors'
activities comply in all material respects with the servicing criteria
applicable to each vendor. The Company is solely responsible for determining
that it meets the SEC requirements to apply Interpretation 17.06 for the
vendors and related criteria as described in its assertion, and we performed
no procedures with respect to the Company's eligibility to apply
Interpretation 17.06.
(page)
(logo) KPMG
In our opinion, management's assessment that the Company complied with the
aforementioned servicing criteria, including servicing criteria 1122(d)(2)(i),
1122(d)(2)(vi), 1122(d)(4)(iv), 1122(d)(4)(xi), and 1122(d)(4)(xiii) for which
compliance is determined based on Interpretation 17.06 as described above, as
of and for the year ended December 31, 2007 is fairly stated, in all material
respects.
/s/ KPMG LLP
Des Moines, Iowa
February 25, 2008
KPMG LLP, a U.S. limited liability partnership, is the U.S.
member firm of KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative
Dates Referenced Herein
This ‘10-K’ Filing | | Date | | Other Filings |
---|
| | |
Filed on: | | 3/25/08 | | None on these Dates |
| | 2/25/08 |
For Period End: | | 12/31/07 |
| List all Filings |
↑Top
Filing Submission 0001056404-08-000822 – Alternative Formats (Word / Rich Text, HTML, Plain Text, et al.)
Copyright © 2024 Fran Finnegan & Company LLC – All Rights Reserved.
About — Privacy — Redactions — Help —
Fri., Apr. 26, 12:15:55.1am ET