SEC Info  
    Home      Search      My Interests      Help      Sign In      Please Sign In

Pricesmart Inc – ‘10-K/A’ for 8/31/05 – ‘COVER’

On:  Wednesday, 1/25/06, at 7:45pm ET   ·   As of:  1/26/06   ·   For:  8/31/05   ·   Private-to-Public:  Document  –  Release Delayed to:  6/23/06   ·   Accession #:  1193125-6-12010   ·   File #:  0-22793

Previous ‘10-K’:  ‘10-K’ on 11/29/05 for 8/31/05   ·   Next:  ‘10-K/A’ on 6/30/06 for 8/31/05   ·   Latest:  ‘10-K’ on 10/30/23 for 8/31/23

Find Words in Filings emoji
 
  in    Show  and   Hints

  As Of                Filer                Filing    For·On·As Docs:Size              Issuer               Agent

 1/26/06  Pricesmart Inc                    10-K/A8/31/05    7:1.1M                                   Donnelley … Solutions/FA

Amendment to Annual Report   —   Form 10-K
Filing Table of Contents

Document/Exhibit                   Description                      Pages   Size 

 1: 10-K/A      Amendment to Annual Report                          HTML   1.07M 
 7: COVER     ¶ Comment-Response or Cover Letter to the SEC         HTML     19K 
 2: EX-23.1     Consent of Ernst & Young LLP                        HTML      8K 
 3: EX-31.1     Certification of Chief Executive Officer            HTML     12K 
 4: EX-31.2     Certification of Chief Financial Officer            HTML     11K 
 5: EX-32.1     Certifications Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350   HTML      9K 
 6: EX-32.2     Certifications Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350   HTML      9K 


Delayed-Release ‘COVER’   —   Comment-Response or Cover Letter to the SEC


This is an HTML Document rendered as filed.  [ Alternative Formats ]



  Letter to the SEC  
Robert E. Burwell    12636 High Bluff Drive, Suite 400
Direct Dial: (858) 523-5408    San Diego, California 92130-2071
Rob.Burwell@lw.com    Tel: (858) 523-5400 Fax: (858) 523-5450
     www.lw.com
LOGO    FIRM / AFFILIATE OFFICES
   Boston    New York
   Brussels    Northern Virginia
   Chicago    Orange County
   Frankfurt    Paris
     Hamburg    San Diego
     Hong Kong    San Francisco
     London    Shanghai
     Los Angeles    Silicon Valley
     Milan    Singapore
     Moscow    Tokyo
     New Jersey    Washington, D.C.
     File No. 026004-0000

 

January 26, 2006

 

VIA EDGAR

 

Mr. H. Christopher Owings

Division of Corporation Finance

Securities and Exchange Commission

100 F Street, N.E.

Washington, DC 20549

 

Comments:    Re: PriceSmart, Inc.
     Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement on Form
     S-1 on Form S-3
     Filed December 27, 2005
     File No. 333-120953
     Form 10-K for Fiscal Year Ended August 31, 2005
     Filed November 29, 2005
     File No. 0-22793

 

Dear Mr. Owings:

 

We are in receipt of the Staff’s letter dated January 10, 2006 with respect to the above-referenced Registration Statement on Form S-3. We also received an additional comment from the Staff by telephone on January 13, 2005. We are responding to the Staff’s comments on behalf of PriceSmart, Inc. (“PriceSmart” or the “Company”) as set forth below in connection with PriceSmart’s filing of Amendment No. 1 to its Form 10-K (the “10-K Amendment”) for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2005. Simultaneously with the filing of this letter, PriceSmart is submitting (via EDGAR) the 10-K Amendment responding to the Staff’s comments, as well as Post-Effective Amendment No. 2 to Registration Statement on Form S-1 on Form S-3 (“Post-Effective Amendment No. 2”) to update the list of documents incorporated therein by reference to include the 10-K Amendment and the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed January 17, 2005.

 

PriceSmart’s responses set forth in this letter are numbered to correspond to the numbered comment in the Staff’s letter. For ease of reference, we have set forth the Staff’s comment and PriceSmart’s response below.


Mr. H. Christopher Owings

January 26, 2006

Page 2

 

LOGO

 

Form 10-K for Fiscal Year Ended August 31, 2005

 

Controls and Procedures, page 16

 

1. We note your disclosure that in light of the noted material weakness, your Interim Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer “[w]ere not able to conclude that disclosure controls and procedures were effective at a reasonable assurance level.” Your disclosure appears to suggest that your disclosure controls and procedures were ineffective, but does not specifically make this representation. Accordingly, please revise to affirmatively state whether your Interim Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that your disclosure controls and procedures were effective or ineffective.

 

Confidential Response? No

 

The Company has revised its disclosure in accordance with the Staff’s comment. As revised, Item 9A of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K states, “Based on the foregoing, and specifically in light of the material weakness noted above, [the Company’s] Interim Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer determined that disclosure controls and procedures were not effective at a reasonable assurance level.”

 

Statement of Cash Flows

 

2. In a telephone conversation on January 13, 2005 between the Staff’s Andrew Blume and the Company’s Chief Financial Officer, John Heffner, the Staff commented that the presentation of the cash flow implications of the Company’s discontinued operations on its consolidated statements of cash flows in a separate section of the cash flow statement was not appropriate. The Staff suggested three options of presentation, which included: 1. Allocating discontinued operations to each section (Operating, Financing and Investing activities); 2. Combining continuing and discontinued operations in each of the sections of the cash flow statement; 3. Separately identifying continuing and discontinued operations in the Operating activities section, but combining them in the Financing and Investing activities sections.

 

Confidential Response? No

 

When preparing its Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended August 31, 2005 and 2004, the Company included all cash flow related activities of the Company’s discontinued operations as a separate section, consistent with the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets and Consolidated Statements of Operations on which discontinued operations are separately identified. The Company was not able to find specific guidance in the accounting literature on the presentation format required. However, based on the Staff’s comment and the interpretation issued in December 2005 related to the treatment of discontinued operations in cash flow statements, the Company has revised its consolidated statements of cash flows in accordance with the first alternative suggested by the Staff. The revised consolidated statements of cash flows reflect the impact of cash flows used in discontinued operations on cash flows provided by (used in) operating activities, investing activities and financing activities.


Mr. H. Christopher Owings

January 26, 2006

Page 3

 

LOGO

 

Please call me at (858) 523-5408 with any questions or comments you may have.

 

Very truly yours,

/s/ ROBERT E. BURWELL


Robert E. Burwell

of LATHAM & WATKINS LLP

 

cc: Kurt Murao, Esq.

Securities and Exchange Commission

 

Andrew Blume, Esq.

  Securities and Exchange Commission

 

Robert M. Gans, Esq.

John M. Heffner

  PriceSmart, Inc.


Dates Referenced Herein   and   Documents Incorporated by Reference

This ‘10-K/A’ Filing    Date    Other Filings
Filed as of:1/26/064,  CORRESP,  POS AM,  S-1/A
Filed on:1/25/064,  CORRESP
1/10/06UPLOAD
12/27/05POS AM
11/29/0510-K
For Period End:8/31/0510-K,  10-K/A,  UPLOAD
1/17/05
1/13/054
8/31/0410-K,  10-K/A,  ARS
 List all Filings 
Top
Filing Submission 0001193125-06-012010   –   Alternative Formats (Word / Rich Text, HTML, Plain Text, et al.)

Copyright © 2024 Fran Finnegan & Company LLC – All Rights Reserved.
AboutPrivacyRedactionsHelp — Wed., May 1, 11:12:36.1am ET