2. SUMMARY OF
SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Basis of
Consolidation and Presentation
The
accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts
of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries. All significant
intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in
consolidation. Certain amounts in the Company’s prior period
consolidated financial statements and notes to the financial
statements have been reclassified to conform to current period
presentation.
Variable
Interest Entities
The Company
performs a qualitative analysis to determine if it is the primary
beneficiary of a variable interest entity. This analysis includes
consideration of who has the power to direct the activities of the
entity that most significantly impact the entity’s economic
performance and who has the obligation to absorb losses or the
right to receive benefits of the variable interest entity that
could potentially be significant to the variable interest entity.
The Company continuously reassesses whether it is the primary
beneficiary of a variable interest entity.
The Company has
consolidated one entity for which it is the primary beneficiary.
Total net assets and results of operations of the entity as of and
for the year ended December 31, 2013 are not
significant.
Use of
Estimates
The preparation
of financial statements requires management to make estimates and
assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial
statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from
those estimates.
The
Company’s operations are affected by numerous factors,
including changes in audience acceptance (i.e. ratings), priorities
of advertisers, new laws and governmental regulations and policies
and technological advances. The Company cannot predict if any of
these factors might have a significant impact on the television and
radio advertising industries in the future, nor can it predict what
impact, if any, the occurrence of these or other events might have
on the Company’s operations and cash flows. Significant
estimates and assumptions made by management are used for, but not
limited to, the allowance for doubtful accounts, stock-based
compensation, the estimated useful lives of long-lived and
intangible assets, the recoverability of such assets by their
estimated future undiscounted cash flows, the fair value of
reporting units and indefinite life intangible assets, fair values
of derivative instruments, disclosure of the fair value of debt,
deferred income taxes and the purchase price allocations used in
the Company’s acquisitions.
Cash and
Cash Equivalents
The Company
considers all short-term, highly liquid debt instruments purchased
with original maturities of three months or less to be cash
equivalents. Cash and cash equivalents consist of funds held in
general checking accounts, money market accounts and commercial
paper. Cash and cash equivalents are stated at cost plus accrued
interest, which approximates fair value.
Long-lived Assets, Other Assets and Intangibles Subject
to Amortization
Property and
equipment are recorded at cost. Depreciation and amortization are
provided using the straight-line method over their estimated useful
lives (see Note 5). The Company periodically evaluates assets to be
held and used and long-lived assets held for sale, when events and
circumstances warrant such review.
Syndication
contracts are recorded at cost. Syndication amortization is
provided using the straight-line method over their estimated useful
lives.
Intangible
assets subject to amortization are amortized on a straight-line
method over their estimated useful lives (see Note 4). Favorable
leasehold interests and pre-sold advertising contracts are
amortized over the term of the underlying contracts. Deferred debt
issuance costs are amortized over the life of the related
indebtedness using the effective interest method.
Changes in
circumstances, such as the passage of new laws or changes in
regulations, technological advances or changes to the
Company’s business strategy, could result in the actual
useful lives differing from initial estimates. Factors such as
changes in the planned use of equipment, customer attrition,
contractual amendments or mandated regulatory requirements could
result in shortened useful lives. In those cases where the Company
determines that the useful life of a long-lived asset should be
revised, the Company will amortize or depreciate the net book value
in excess of the estimated residual value over its revised
remaining useful life.
Long-lived
assets and asset groups are evaluated for impairment whenever
events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying
amount of such assets may not be recoverable. The estimated future
cash flows are based upon, among other things, assumptions about
expected future operating performance, and may differ from actual
cash flows. Long-lived assets evaluated for impairment are grouped
with other assets to the lowest level for which identifiable cash
flows are largely independent of the cash flows of other groups of
assets and liabilities. If the sum of the projected undiscounted
cash flows (excluding interest) is less than the carrying value of
the assets, the assets will be written down to the estimated fair
value in the period in which the determination is made.
Goodwill
Goodwill
represents the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of
the net tangible and identifiable intangible assets acquired in
each business combination. The Company tests its goodwill and other
indefinite-lived intangible assets for impairment annually on the
first day of its fourth fiscal quarter, or more frequently if
certain events or certain changes in circumstances indicate they
may be impaired. In assessing the recoverability of goodwill and
indefinite life intangible assets, the Company must make a series
of assumptions about such things as the estimated future cash flows
and other factors to determine the fair value of these
assets.
Goodwill
impairment testing is a two-step process. The first step is a
comparison of the fair values of the Company’s reporting
units to their respective carrying amounts. The Company has
determined that each of its operating segments is a reporting unit.
If a reporting unit’s estimated fair value is equal to or
greater than that reporting unit’s carrying value, no
impairment of goodwill exists and the testing is complete at the
first step. However, if the reporting unit’s carrying amount
is greater than the estimated fair value, the second step must be
completed to measure the amount of impairment of goodwill, if any.
The second step of the goodwill impairment test compares the
implied fair value of a reporting unit’s goodwill with its
carrying amount to measure the amount of impairment loss, if any.
If the implied fair value of goodwill is less than the carrying
value of goodwill, then an impairment exists and an impairment loss
is recorded for the amount of the difference.
The estimated
fair value of goodwill is determined by using a combination of a
market approach and an income approach. The market approach
estimates fair value by applying sales, earnings and cash flow
multiples to each reporting unit’s operating performance. The
multiples are derived from comparable publicly-traded companies
with similar operating and investment characteristics to the
Company’s reporting units. The market approach requires the
Company to make a series of assumptions, such as selecting
comparable companies and comparable transactions and transaction
premiums. The current economic conditions have led to a decrease in
the number of comparable transactions, which makes the market
approach of comparable transactions and transaction premiums more
difficult to estimate than in previous years.
The income
approach estimates fair value based on the Company’s
estimated future cash flows of each reporting unit, discounted by
an estimated weighted-average cost of capital that reflects current
market conditions, which reflect the overall level of inherent risk
of that reporting unit. The income approach also requires the
Company to make a series of assumptions, such as discount rates,
revenue projections, profit margin projections and terminal value
multiples. The Company estimated discount rates on a blended rate
of return considering both debt and equity for comparable
publicly-traded companies in the television and radio industries.
These comparable publicly-traded companies have similar size,
operating characteristics and/or financial profiles to the Company.
The Company also estimated the terminal value multiple based on
comparable publicly-traded companies in the television and radio
industries. The Company estimated revenue projections and profit
margin projections based on internal forecasts about future
performance.
Indefinite Life Intangible Assets
The Company
believes that its broadcast licenses are indefinite life intangible
assets. An intangible asset is determined to have an indefinite
useful life when there are no legal, regulatory, contractual,
competitive, economic or any other factors that may limit the
period over which the asset is expected to contribute directly or
indirectly to future cash flows. The evaluation of impairment for
indefinite life intangible assets is performed by a comparison of
the asset’s carrying value to the asset’s fair value.
When the carrying value exceeds fair value, an impairment charge is
recorded for the amount of the difference. The unit of accounting
used to test broadcast licenses represents all licenses owned and
operated within an individual market cluster, because such licenses
are used together, are complimentary to each other and are
representative of the best use of those assets. The Company’s
individual market clusters consist of cities or nearby cities. The
Company tests its broadcasting licenses for impairment based on
certain assumptions about these market clusters.
The estimated
fair value of indefinite life intangible assets is determined by
using an income approach. The income approach estimates fair value
based on the estimated future cash flows of each market cluster
that a hypothetical buyer would expect to generate, discounted by
an estimated weighted-average cost of capital that reflects current
market conditions, which reflect the overall level of inherent
risk. The income approach requires the Company to make a series of
assumptions, such as discount rates, revenue projections, profit
margin projections and terminal value multiples. The Company
estimates the discount rates on a blended rate of return
considering both debt and equity for comparable publicly-traded
companies in the television and radio industries. These comparable
publicly-traded companies have similar size, operating
characteristics and/or financial profiles to the Company. The
Company also estimated the terminal value multiple based on
comparable publicly-traded companies in the television and radio
industries. The Company estimated the revenue projections and
profit margin projections based on various market clusters signal
coverage of the markets and industry information for an average
station within a given market. The information for each market
cluster includes such things as estimated market share, estimated
capital start-up costs, population, household income, retail sales
and other expenditures that would influence advertising
expenditures. Alternatively, some stations under evaluation have
had limited relevant cash flow history due to planned or actual
conversion of format or upgrade of station signal. The assumptions
the Company makes about cash flows after conversion are based on
the performance of similar stations in similar markets and
potential proceeds from the sale of the assets.
Concentrations of Credit Risk and Trade
Receivables
The
Company’s financial instruments that are exposed to
concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of cash and cash
equivalents and trade accounts receivable. The Company from time to
time may have bank deposits in excess of the FDIC insurance limits.
As of December 31, 2013, substantially all deposits are
maintained in one financial institution. The Company has not
experienced any losses in such accounts and believes it is not
exposed to any significant credit risk on cash and cash
equivalents.
The Company
routinely assesses the financial strength of its customers and, as
a consequence, believes that its trade receivable credit risk
exposure is limited. Trade receivables are carried at original
invoice amount less an estimate made for doubtful receivables based
on a review of all outstanding amounts on a monthly basis. A
valuation allowance is provided for known and anticipated credit
losses, as determined by management in the course of regularly
evaluating individual customer receivables. This evaluation takes
into consideration a customer’s financial condition and
credit history, as well as current economic conditions. Trade
receivables are written off when deemed uncollectible. Recoveries
of trade receivables previously written off are recorded when
received. No interest is charged on customer accounts.
Estimated
losses for bad debts are provided for in the financial statements
through a charge to expense that was not significant for the year
ended December 31, 2013, and was $1.0 million and $0.9 million
for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively.
The net charge off of bad debts aggregated $1.1 million, $0.7
million and $2.6 million for the years ended December 31,
2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively.
Dependence on Business Partners
The Company is
dependent on the continued financial and business strength of its
business partners, such as the companies from whom it obtains
programming. The Company could be at risk should any of these
entities fail to perform their obligations to the Company. This in
turn could materially adversely affect the Company’s own
business, results of operations and financial condition.
Disclosures About Fair Value of Financial
Instruments
The following
methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of
each class of financial instruments for which it is practicable to
estimate that value:
The carrying
amount of cash and cash equivalents approximates fair value because
of the short maturity of those instruments.
As of
December 31, 2013, the fair value of the Company’s
long-term debt was approximately $364.1 million, based on an income
approach which projects expected future cash flows and discounts
them using a rate based on industry and market yields.
As of
December 31, 2012, the fair value of the Company’s
long-term debt was approximately $371.3 million, respectively,
based on the quoted market prices for the same or similar issues or
on the current rates offered to the Company for debt of the same
remaining maturities with similar collateral
requirements.
The carrying
values of receivables, payables and accrued expenses approximate
fair value due to the short maturity of these
instruments.
Derivative Instruments
The Company
uses derivatives in the management of interest rate risk with
respect to interest expense on variable rate debt. The
Company’s current policy prohibits entering into derivative
instruments for speculation or trading purposes. The Company is
party to interest rate swap agreements with financial institutions
that will fix the variable benchmark component (LIBOR) of the
Company’s interest rate on a portion of its term loan
beginning December 31, 2015.
ASC 820,
“Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures”, requires the
Company to recognize all of its derivative instruments as either
assets or liabilities in the consolidated balance sheet at fair
value. The accounting for changes in the fair value of a derivative
instrument depends on whether it has been designated and qualifies
as part of a hedging relationship, and further, on the type of
hedging relationship. The interest rate swap agreements were
designated and qualified as a cash flow hedge; therefore, the
effective portion of the changes in fair value is a component of
other comprehensive income. Any ineffective portions of the changes
in fair value of the interest rate swap agreements will be
immediately recognized directly to interest expense in the
consolidated statement of operations. See Notes 8 and 9 for further
discussion of derivative instruments.
Off-balance Sheet Financings and
Liabilities
Other than
lease commitments, legal contingencies incurred in the normal
course of business, employment contracts for key employees and the
interest rate swap agreements (see Notes 8, 9, 11 and 15), the
Company does not have any off-balance sheet financing arrangements
or liabilities. The Company does not have any majority-owned
subsidiaries or any interests in, or relationships with, any
material variable-interest entities that are not included in the
consolidated financial statements.
Income
Taxes
Deferred income
taxes are provided on a liability method whereby deferred tax
assets are recognized for deductible temporary differences and
deferred tax liabilities are recognized for taxable temporary
differences. Temporary differences are the differences between the
reported amounts of assets and liabilities and their tax bases.
Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance when it is
determined to be more likely than not that some portion or all of
the deferred tax assets will not be realized. Deferred tax assets
and liabilities are adjusted for the effects of changes in tax laws
and rates on the date of enactment.
In evaluating
the Company’s ability to realize net deferred tax assets, the
Company considers all reasonably available evidence including past
operating results, tax strategies and forecasts of future taxable
income. In considering these factors, the Company makes certain
assumptions and judgments that are based on the plans and estimates
used to manage the business.
The Company
recognizes the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if
it is more likely than not the tax position will be sustained on
examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical
merits of the position. The tax benefits recognized in the
financial statements from such positions are then measured based on
the largest benefit that has a greater than 50% likelihood of being
realized upon settlement. The Company recognizes interest and
penalties related to uncertain tax positions in income tax
expense.
Advertising Costs
Amounts
incurred for advertising costs with third parties are expensed as
incurred. Advertising expense totaled approximately $0.3 million,
$0.3 million and $0.4 million for the years ended December 31,
2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively.
Legal
Costs
Amounts
incurred for legal costs that pertain to loss contingencies are
expensed as incurred.
Repairs
and Maintenance
All costs
associated with repairs and maintenance are expensed as
incurred.
Revenue
Recognition
Television and
radio revenue related to the sale of advertising is recognized at
the time of broadcast. Revenue for contracts with advertising
agencies is recorded at an amount that is net of the commission
retained by the agency. Revenue from contracts directly with the
advertisers is recorded at gross revenue and the related commission
or national representation fee is recorded in operating expense.
Cash payments received prior to services rendered result in
deferred revenue, which is then recognized as revenue when the
advertising time or space is actually provided.
The Company
also generates interactive revenues under arrangements that are
sold on a standalone basis and those that are sold on a combined
basis that are integrated with its broadcast revenue and reported
within the television and radio segments. The Company has
determined that these integrated revenue arrangements include
multiple deliverables and has separated them into different units
of accounting based on their relative sales price based upon
management’s best estimate. Revenue for each unit of
accounting is recognized as it is earned.
In August 2008,
the Company entered into a proxy agreement with Univision pursuant
to which the Company granted Univision the right to negotiate
retransmission consent agreements for its Univision- and
UniMás-affiliated television station signals for a term of six
years, expiring in December 2014. Among other things, the proxy
agreement provides terms relating to compensation to be paid to the
Company by Univision with respect to retransmission consent
agreements entered into with Multichannel Video Programming
Distributors (“MVPDs”). The term of the proxy agreement
extends with respect to any MVPD for the length of the term of any
retransmission consent agreement in effect before the expiration of
the proxy agreement. It is also our current intention to negotiate
with Univision an extension of the current proxy agreement or a new
proxy agreement; however, no assurance can be given regarding the
terms of any such extension or new agreement or that any such
extension or new agreement will be entered into. Revenue for the
carriage of the Company’s Univision- and
UniMás-affiliated television station signals is recognized
over the life of each agreement with the cable, satellite and
internet-based television service providers. Advertising related to
carriage of the Company’s Univision- and
UniMás-affiliated television station signals is recognized at
the time of broadcast. Retransmission consent revenue was $22.2
million, $20.2 million and $17.1 million for the years ended
December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively.
Trade
Transactions
The Company
exchanges broadcast time for certain merchandise and services.
Trade revenue is recognized when commercials air at the fair value
of the goods or services received or the fair value of time aired,
whichever is more readily determinable. Trade expense is recorded
when the goods or services are used or received. Trade revenue was
approximately $0.5 million, $0.6 million and $0.8 million for the
years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively.
Trade costs were approximately $0.5 million, $0.6 million and $0.8
million for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011,
respectively.
Stock-Based Compensation
The Company
accounts for stock-based compensation according to the provisions
of ASC 718, “Stock Compensation”, which requires the
measurement and recognition of compensation expense for all
stock-based awards made to employees and directors including
employee stock options, restricted stock awards, restricted stock
units, and employee stock purchases under the 2001 Employee Stock
Purchase Plan (the “Purchase Plan”) based on estimated
fair values.
ASC 718
requires companies to estimate the fair value of stock options on
the date of grant using an option pricing model. The fair value of
restricted stock awards and restricted stock units is based on the
closing market price of the Company’s common stock on the
date of grant. The value of the portion of the award that is
ultimately expected to vest has been reduced for estimated
forfeitures and is recognized as expense over the requisite service
periods in the consolidated statements of operations. Forfeitures
are estimated at the time of grant and revised, if necessary, in
subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those
estimates.
The Company
selected the Black-Scholes option pricing model as the most
appropriate method for determining the estimated fair value for
stock options. The Black-Scholes option pricing model requires the
use of highly subjective and complex assumptions which determine
the fair value of stock-based awards, including the option’s
expected term, expected volatility of the underlying stock,
risk-free rate, and expected dividends. The expected volatility is
based on historical volatility of the Company’s common stock
and other relevant factors. The expected term assumptions are based
on the Company’s historical experience and on the terms and
conditions of the stock-based awards. The risk free-rate is based
on observed interest rates appropriate for the expected terms of
the Company’s stock options. The dividend rate is based on
the Company’s dividend policy.
The Company
classifies cash flows from excess tax benefits from exercised
options in excess of the deferred tax asset attributable to
stock-based compensation costs as financing cash flows.
Earnings
(Loss) Per Share
The following
table illustrates the reconciliation of the basic and diluted per
share computations (in thousands, except share and per share
data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
December 31,
2013 |
|
|
Year Ended
December 31,
2012 |
|
|
Year Ended
December 31,
2011 |
|
Basic earnings per
share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Numerator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
applicable to common stockholders
|
|
$ |
133,825 |
|
|
$ |
13,601 |
|
|
$ |
(8,200 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common
shares outstanding, basic
|
|
|
87,401,123 |
|
|
|
85,882,646 |
|
|
|
85,051,066 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per share
applicable to common stockholders
|
|
$ |
1.53 |
|
|
$ |
0.16 |
|
|
$ |
(0.10 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per
share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Numerator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
applicable to common stockholders
|
|
$ |
133,825 |
|
|
$ |
13,601 |
|
|
$ |
(8,200 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common
shares outstanding
|
|
|
87,401,123 |
|
|
|
85,882,646 |
|
|
|
85,051,066 |
|
Dilutive
securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock options
|
|
|
1,625,668 |
|
|
|
89,418 |
|
|
|
— |
|
Restricted stock
units
|
|
|
311,905 |
|
|
|
342,142 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted shares
outstanding
|
|
|
89,338,696 |
|
|
|
86,314,206 |
|
|
|
85,051,066 |
|
Per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per share
applicable to common stockholders
|
|
$ |
1.50 |
|
|
$ |
0.16 |
|
|
$ |
(0.10 |
) |
Basic earnings
per share is computed as net income (loss) divided by the weighted
average number of shares outstanding for the period. Diluted
earnings per share reflects the potential dilution, if any, that
could occur from shares issuable through stock options and
restricted stock awards.
For the year
ended December 31, 2013, and 2012, a total of 5,670,908 and
8,573,761 shares of dilutive securities, respectively, were not
included in the computation of diluted income per share because the
exercise prices of the dilutive securities were greater than the
average market price of the common shares.
For the year
ended December 31, 2011, all dilutive securities have been
excluded, as their inclusion would have had an antidilutive effect
on loss per share. The number of securities whose conversion would
result in an incremental number of shares that would be included in
determining the weighted average shares outstanding for diluted
earnings per share if their effect was not antidilutive was 610,650
equivalent shares of dilutive securities for the year ended
December 31, 2011.
Comprehensive Income
For the years
ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, the Company had
comprehensive income of $0.2 million, $0, and $0, respectively,
related to the fair value of swaps.
Recently
Issued Accounting Pronouncements
In July 2013,
the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”)
issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”)
No. 2013-11, “Presentation of an Unrecognized Tax
Benefit When a Net Operating Loss Carryforward, a Similar Tax Loss,
or a Tax Credit Carryforward Exists”. The update provides
guidance on the financial statement presentation of an unrecognized
tax benefit, as either a reduction of a deferred tax asset or as a
liability, when a net operating loss carryforward, similar tax
loss, or a tax credit carryforward exists. This update becomes
effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years,
beginning after December 15, 2013. The Company is currently
evaluating the impact of this update on the consolidated financial
statements.