SEC Info℠ | Home | Search | My Interests | Help | Sign In | Please Sign In | ||||||||||||||||||||
As Of Filer Filing For·On·As Docs:Size Issuer Agent 4/17/15 Council of Europe Dev Bank 18-K 12/31/14 5:2.1M RR Donnelley/FA |
Document/Exhibit Description Pages Size 1: 18-K Annual Report of a Foreign Government or Political HTML 29K Subdivision 2: EX-1 Underwriting Agreement HTML 25K 3: EX-2 Plan of Acquisition, Reorganization, Arrangement, HTML 815K Liquidation or Succession 4: EX-3 Articles of Incorporation/Organization or By-Laws HTML 621K 5: EX-4 Instrument Defining the Rights of Security Holders HTML 6K
Exhibit 3 |
Description of the Registrant and Recent Developments
This description of the Council of Europe Development Bank (the “CEB” or the “Bank”) is dated April 16, 2015 and appears as Exhibit 3 to the Annual Report on Form 18-K of CEB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014.
2 | ||||
2 | ||||
2 | ||||
2 | ||||
3 | ||||
3 | ||||
4 | ||||
Cooperation with the European Union and Other International Institutions |
5 | |||
6 | ||||
9 | ||||
10 | ||||
10 | ||||
12 | ||||
13 | ||||
13 | ||||
13 | ||||
16 | ||||
18 | ||||
21 | ||||
21 | ||||
21 | ||||
22 | ||||
26 | ||||
26 | ||||
28 | ||||
29 | ||||
30 | ||||
38 | ||||
38 | ||||
40 | ||||
41 | ||||
41 | ||||
41 | ||||
Current Membership of the Governing Board and the Administrative Council |
42 | |||
46 | ||||
47 | ||||
47 |
THE DELIVERY OF THIS DOCUMENT AT ANY TIME DOES NOT IMPLY THAT THE INFORMATION IS CORRECT AS OF ANY TIME SUBSEQUENT TO ITS DATE. THIS DOCUMENT (OTHERWISE THAN AS PART OF A PROSPECTUS CONTAINED IN A REGISTRATION STATEMENT FILED UNDER THE U.S. SECURITIES ACT OF 1933) DOES NOT CONSTITUTE AN OFFER TO SELL OR THE SOLICITATION OF AN OFFER TO BUY ANY SECURITIES OF COUNCIL OF EUROPE DEVELOPMENT BANK.
1
PRESENTATION OF FINANCIAL INFORMATION
The capital of the CEB is denominated, and its accounts are kept, in euro. As used herein, the terms “euros”, “EUR” and the euro sign (€) refer to the single European currency of the member States of the European Union participating in the euro, and the terms “dollars”, “U.S. dollars”, “USD” and the dollar sign ($) refer to United States dollars.
Any discrepancies in the tables included in this annual report between the amounts and the totals thereof are due to rounding.
The table below sets forth, for the periods indicated, information concerning the EUR/USD reference rate as published by the European Central Bank. No representation is made that the euro or U.S. dollar amounts referred to herein could be or could have been converted into U.S. dollars or euros, as the case may be, at any particular rate or at all. No representation is made that euro amounts actually represented, or have been or could be converted into, U.S. dollars at such rates or at any other rates on any of the dates indicated.
On April 15, 2015 the reference rate for the euro was $1.0579.
High | Low | Period Average(1) |
Period End | |||||||||||||
2015 |
||||||||||||||||
April(2) |
1.0862 | 1.0552 | 1.0704 | 1.0579 | ||||||||||||
March |
1.1227 | 1.0557 | 1.0838 | 1.0759 | ||||||||||||
February |
1.1447 | 1.1240 | 1.1350 | 1.1240 | ||||||||||||
January |
1.2043 | 1.1198 | 1.1621 | 1.1305 | ||||||||||||
2014 |
||||||||||||||||
December |
1.2537 | 1.2141 | 1.2331 | 1.2141 | ||||||||||||
November |
1.2539 | 1.2393 | 1.2472 | 1.2483 | ||||||||||||
October |
1.2823 | 1.2524 | 1.2673 | 1.2524 | ||||||||||||
September |
1.3151 | 1.2583 | 1.2901 | 1.2583 | ||||||||||||
2014 |
1.3953 | 1.2141 | 1.3285 | 1.2141 | ||||||||||||
2013 |
1.3814 | 1.2768 | 1.3281 | 1.3791 | ||||||||||||
2012 |
1.3454 | 1.2089 | 1.2848 | 1.3194 | ||||||||||||
2011 |
1.4882 | 1.2889 | 1.3917 | 1.2939 | ||||||||||||
2010 |
1.4563 | 1.1942 | 1.3257 | 1.3362 |
(1) | Computed using the average of the exchange rates for euros on each business day during the relevant monthly or annual period. |
(2) | Through April 15, 2015. |
THE COUNCIL OF EUROPE DEVELOPMENT BANK
The Council of Europe Development Bank is a multilateral development bank with a social vocation.
The CEB was established in 1956 by eight Council of Europe member states pursuant to a Partial Agreement between those states (the “Partial Agreement”). The Bank is governed by the Third Protocol to the General Agreement on Privileges and Immunities of the Council of Europe of March 6, 1959 (the “Protocol”), by its Articles of Agreement as amended (the “Articles”) and by regulations issued pursuant to the Articles. The CEB falls under the supreme authority of the Council of Europe but is legally separate and financially autonomous from it. The Bank is solely responsible for its own indebtedness. Currently, 41 European states are members of the Bank (the “Member States”)1.
1 | See “Member States” below for further details. |
2
Originally, the Bank’s primary purpose was to finance social programs related to the resettlement of refugees migrating to and between European countries in the aftermath of World War II. The Bank later extended the scope of its activities to providing aid to victims of natural or ecological disasters and to supporting other social objectives directly contributing to strengthening social cohesion in Europe. These other social objectives currently include education and vocational training, health, housing for low-income persons, supporting micro, small and medium-sized enterprises (“MSMEs”), improving living conditions in urban and rural areas, protection of the environment, protection of historic and cultural heritage, and infrastructure of administrative and judicial public services. See “Operations”.
In order to serve these objectives, the Bank grants or guarantees long-term loans to its Member States or institutions approved by them. Since its inception, the CEB has disbursed approximately €39 billion in loans. The CEB’s loans and guarantees typically cover only part of the cost of any project, supplementing each borrower’s own funds and credits from other sources, which may include other multilateral lending institutions. With certain exceptions, the Bank generally does not lend more than 50% of the cost of a project. As of December 31, 2014, the CEB had the equivalent of €12.6 billion of loans outstanding, excluding interest receivable and fair value adjustments of loans hedged by derivative instruments.
The CEB funds its operations primarily through debt offerings in the international capital markets. As of December 31, 2014, the Bank had total outstanding funded debt (debt securities, including interest payable thereon and value adjustments of debt securities hedged by derivative instruments) of €20.5 billion. The Bank’s capital consists of participating certificates which are subscribed to by its Member States. Starting with subscribed capital equivalent to €5.7 million in 1956, the Bank had subscribed capital of €5.5 billion as of December 31, 2014. See “Capital Structure”. As of December 31, 2014, €612.4 million of the Bank’s subscribed capital has been paid in.
The Governing Board may, upon a proposal of the Administrative Council, make calls upon subscribed and unpaid capital in order to enable the CEB to meet its obligations, including repaying the Bank’s indebtedness. Since the CEB’s inception, no such calls have ever been made. In addition, the Governing Board may, upon a proposal of the Administrative Council, decide to increase the Bank’s subscribed capital, as it did on February 4, 2011 when it approved the Bank’s 6th capital increase. See “Capital Structure”.
The CEB is supervised by a Governing Board and an Administrative Council, each of which are composed of representatives of each of the Member States. The Bank is represented in all of its transactions and legal proceedings by a Governor appointed for a five-year term by the Governing Board. The Bank’s operational headquarters are located at 55, avenue Kléber, 75116 Paris, France.
The CEB was established on April 16, 1956 pursuant to the Articles adopted by the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe (the “Committee of Ministers”). The Committee of Ministers is the Council of Europe’s decision-making body. It comprises the ministers of foreign affairs of all member states of the Council of Europe, or their permanent diplomatic representatives in Strasbourg, France. The Articles form an integral part of the Protocol that also governs the CEB. The Protocol endows the CEB with a separate juridical personality with the capacity to enter into contracts, acquire and dispose of property, institute legal proceedings and carry out transactions related to its statutory purposes. The Protocol also grants the CEB various privileges and immunities in the Member States, including (a) an exemption from all direct taxes, (b) freedom of its property and assets from governmental restrictions, regulations, controls and moratoria of any nature, (c) immunity of its property and assets from search, requisition, confiscation, expropriation or any other form of distraint by executive or legislative action, and (d) immunity of its property and assets from all forms of seizure, attachment or execution before the delivery against the CEB of a final enforceable judgment rendered by a court of competent jurisdiction. By virtue of the Protocol, the CEB is subject to a national law only to the extent expressly agreed to by the CEB and to the extent that national law does not derogate from the Protocol or the Articles. However, notwithstanding certain exceptions, the Protocol subjects the CEB to the jurisdiction of the courts of its Member States and those states where the CEB has contracted or guaranteed loans.
According to the Articles, members of the CEB may include member states of the Council of Europe, or, upon the Bank’s authorization, a European state which is not a member of the Council of Europe or an international institution with a European focus. No such international institution has ever been a member of the Bank.
3
The number of Member States of the Bank has increased from 22 in 1991 to 41 in 2014 as a result of new Member States joining primarily from Central and Eastern Europe. The current members of the Bank and their dates of accession are set forth in the table below:
MEMBER STATES OF THE COUNCIL OF EUROPE DEVELOPMENT BANK AND YEAR OF ACCESSION
Albania | 1999 | Lithuania | 1996 | |||||
Belgium | 1956 | Luxembourg | 1956 | |||||
Bosnia and Herzegovina | 2003 | Malta | 1973 | |||||
Bulgaria | 1994 | Moldova (Republic of) | 1998 | |||||
Croatia | 1997 | Montenegro | 2007 | |||||
Cyprus | 1962 | Netherlands | 1978 | |||||
Czech Republic | 1999 | Norway | 1978 | |||||
Denmark | 1978 | Poland | 1998 | |||||
Estonia | 1998 | Portugal | 1976 | |||||
Finland | 1991 | Romania | 1996 | |||||
France | 1956 | San Marino | 1989 | |||||
Georgia | 2007 | Serbia | 2004 | |||||
Germany | 1956 | Slovak Republic | 1998 | |||||
Greece | 1956 | Slovenia | 1994 | |||||
Holy See | 1973 | Spain | 1978 | |||||
Hungary | 1998 | Sweden | 1977 | |||||
Iceland | 1956 | Switzerland | 1974 | |||||
Ireland | 2004 | “the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia” | 1997 | |||||
Italy | 1956 | Turkey | 1956 | |||||
Kosovo | 2013 | |||||||
Latvia | 1998 | |||||||
Liechtenstein | 1976 |
Relationship with the Council of Europe
Founded in 1949, the Council of Europe is a 47-member international organization that works to protect human rights, pluralist democracy and the rule of law; to promote awareness and encourage the development of Europe’s cultural identity and diversity; to find common solutions to the challenges facing European society; and to consolidate democratic stability in Europe by backing political, legislative and constitutional reform. Most countries in Europe are members of the Council of Europe.
Only two member states of the European Union — Austria and the United Kingdom — are members of the Council of Europe but not of the CEB. The Holy See, while a member of the CEB, is not a member of the Council of Europe but an observer to the Committee of Ministers. Kosovo is a member of the CEB but not of the Council of Europe.
The CEB was established pursuant to the Partial Agreement between those Council of Europe member states that wished to become members of the CEB. As a general matter, partial agreements permit member states of the Council of Europe to engage in Council of Europe activities without the approval of all member states. Activities governed by a partial agreement remain an activity of the Council of Europe in the same way as other Council of Europe activities, except that activities pursuant to partial agreements are endowed with their own budgets and working methods determined only by the member states which have entered into the partial agreement. A “Secretariat of the Partial Agreement” acts as a liaison between the Council of Europe and the CEB. The relationship between the two organizations is also guided in practice by the Articles, the Protocol, and various rules of procedure for the Bank’s governing bodies.
The CEB acts under the supreme authority of the Council of Europe, and its social objectives are in line with those of the Council of Europe. The CEB’s statutory purposes cannot be changed except with the approval of the Committee of Ministers. In addition, the Council of Europe must be regularly informed of the CEB’s activities, and the CEB’s Governing Board is required to state a position on any recommendations and opinions concerning the Bank that the Committee of Ministers and the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe may transmit to it. The Secretary General of the Council of Europe is also permitted to participate in, or be represented at, meetings of the CEB’s Governing Board and Administrative Council, without the right to vote. Finally, the Council of Europe also evaluates projects from a political and social perspective as described below under “—Framework and Policies Underlying Activities—Approval process for financing”.
Except as noted herein, however, the CEB is separate from the Council of Europe, is governed by separate supervisory and administrative bodies and maintains its own sources of revenues and financial operations.
4
Cooperation with the European Union and Other International Institutions
In addition to the CEB’s natural connections with the Council of Europe, it has become a partner of the European Union (“EU”). The CEB takes part in the following programs:
• | the Regional Housing Programme (“RHP”), which is aimed at providing durable housing solutions for refugees and displaced persons within the Western Balkans and which was developed by Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia, Montenegro and Serbia with the support of the European Commission, the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), the Organization for Security and Co-Operation in Europe (OSCE) and the United States of America and in the context of which the CEB will manage contributions from donors as well as provide technical and secretariat services; |
• | the Western Balkans Investment Framework, in which the CEB participates together with the EU, the European Investment Bank (“EIB”), the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (“EBRD”) and donors and which aims at facilitating access to European financings for the countries in the Western Balkans; |
• | the Neighbourhood Investment Facility, which combines grants from the EU and donor states with loans from financial institutions (including the EIB, the EBRD and the CEB) in favor of countries eligible under the European Neighbourhood Policy Instrument and which aims at mobilizing additional funding to cover the investment needs of the EU neighboring region for infrastructures in sectors such as transport, energy, the environment and social issues (e.g. construction of schools or hospitals); |
• | tripartite financing facilities, which combine loans from the CEB and Kreditanstalt für Wiederaufbau (KfW) and grants from the Commission and whose funding is used to finance investments intended to create or maintain jobs in MSMEs, local infrastructure for municipalities and energy efficiency projects in CEB member states of Central and Eastern Europe; |
• | the EU Platform for Blending in External Cooperation (EUBEC), which provides recommendations and guidance on the use of blending in the external cooperation of the EU to unlock additional public and private resources. Blending is a tool which combines EU grants with other public and private sector resources such as loans and equity in order to leverage additional non-grant financing; |
• | the European Platform for Roma Inclusion, set up by the European Commission, which brings together national governments, the EU, international organizations and Roma civil society representatives with the aim of stimulating cooperation and exchanges of experience on successful Roma integration policies and practices; and |
• | the European Local Energy Assistance, a facility, which will provide, until the end of 2014, grants intended for public entities for investments in energy efficiency projects. |
At the end of 2014, EU grants in favor of projects financed by the Bank stood at €296 million. In addition, €125 million in investment grants were approved from the multi-donor RHP Fund, which is partly funded by EU contributions, in favor of 17 RHP housing projects.
The CEB has also signed Memoranda of Understanding or other co-operation agreements with the EBRD, the European Stability Mechanism (ESM), the World Bank Group, the Nordic Investment Bank, the Asian Development Bank, the EIB, KfW, the United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF) and the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR). At the end of 2014, the CEB had approved donations for a total amount of €9.8 million in the framework of these Memoranda of Understanding. Furthermore, the Bank maintains a collaboration with other UN agencies, such as the World Health Organization and the International Organization for Migration.
CEB as ODA-eligible international organization
In 2014, the CEB was added to the list of Official Development Assistance (“ODA”)-eligible international organizations. ODA is a term coined by the Development Assistance Committee (DAC) of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) that is widely used to measure international aid flows from donors to developing countries to support their economic development. ODA is the key measure used in practically all aid targets and assessments of aid performance. In reporting their ODA, donor countries refer to a list of ODA-eligible international organizations. Contributions to these organizations, which are not earmarked, may be reported as ODA in whole or in part.
The CEB’s ODA eligibility recognizes the concessional character (at least partially) of CEB’s lending and its grant element. It also aligns CEB with its peers, such as the Asian Development Bank, the Black Sea Trade and Development Bank, the EBRD, the EIB and the World Bank Group, all of which are already listed as ODA-eligible international organizations.
5
Framework and Policies Underlying Activities
Objectives of the CEB
Established in 1956 in order to finance social programs for European refugees, the CEB’s scope of action has progressively broadened to include other objectives that contribute to strengthening social cohesion within Europe. These objectives are organized along “sectoral lines of action”, which are currently (i) “strengthening social integration”, which includes social housing for low-income persons, aid to refugees, migrants and displaced persons and the improvement of living conditions in urban and rural areas; (ii) “managing the environment”, which includes environmental protection, assistance in case of natural or ecological disasters and protection and rehabilitation of historic and cultural heritage; (iii) “supporting public infrastructure with a social vocation”, which includes initiatives in the sectors of health, education and vocational training, and infrastructure of administrative and judicial public services; and (iv) “supporting micro, small and medium-sized enterprises”, which focuses on the creation and preservation of viable jobs, in particular in MSMEs. For more detailed information on the Bank’s operations along its sectoral lines of action, see “Operations”.
Financing methods
The CEB operations primarily consist of providing loans for investment projects of a social nature.
The CEB grants loans to the following counterparties: (i) Member States of the Bank; (ii) any legal entity approved and guaranteed by a Member State; and (iii) any legal entity approved by one of the CEB’s Member States if the Administrative Council deems the loan to carry sufficient guarantees. Any such loan may, under certain conditions, benefit from interest rate subsidies from an account known as the Social Dividend Account, which is described below.
In addition to granting loans, the Bank may also provide guarantees to financial institutions approved by a Member State for loans that further the Bank’s statutory purposes as set forth in the Articles, although in practice the Bank has only very rarely done so and such guarantees have accounted for only a small part of the Bank’s historical activity.
General project financing guidelines
The CEB carries out its mission within the strategic framework of a formal development plan that describes the objectives underpinning the CEB’s actions and sets forth guidelines for its activity in the medium term in relation to the operational context within which the Bank operates.
General guidelines for CEB’s project financing activity are set out in the Bank’s development plan for 2014–2016 (the “Development Plan 2014–2016”), as well as in CEB’s Loan and Project Financing Policy (the “Policy”) and, from an operational perspective, in an operational manual called the CEB Handbook for the Preparation and Implementation of Projects. For additional information on the Bank’s development plan, see “—Development Plan 2014–2016” below.
According to the Policy, a CEB borrower may be a Member State, a central or local government entity, a financial institution or any other public or private entity. At the request of the CEB, a borrower’s commitments may be guaranteed by a third party. The guarantor may be a Member State, a government entity, a financial institution or any other public or private legal entity approved by the CEB.
The CEB’s share of the financing generally may represent up to 50% of the total eligible cost of a project. This share may be higher, up to a limit of 90%, depending on the social impact of a project, the scarcity of alternative financing sources, the extent to which CEB plays a key role in guiding the project’s preparation and implementation, and the financial situation of the borrower country and its ability to proceed with a priority social investment given the lack of affordable financing, among other factors.
The CEB’s loan share may also be higher for projects implemented in the Bank’s 22 “target countries” in Central, Eastern and Southeastern Europe, namely Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus, the Czech Republic, Estonia, Georgia, Hungary, Kosovo, Latvia, Lithuania, Malta, The Republic of Moldova, Montenegro, Poland, Romania, Serbia, the Slovak Republic, Slovenia, “the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia” and Turkey (collectively, the “Target Countries”).
Costs eligible for CEB financing include those incurred in connection with surveys or studies; technical project supervision; acquisition and development of land; construction, renovation and modernization or purchase of buildings; installation of basic infrastructure; purchase of materials and equipment; training of staff; and certain contingent events. Financial costs or investments (such as debt repayment, refinancing, interest charges or acquisition of interest in the capital of an enterprise) are generally not eligible for CEB financing.
Public Sector Financing Facility (“PFF”) loans are a CEB financing instrument introduced by the Development Plan 2014–2016. For the PFF, which is an instrument intended for public entities whose funding is primarily budget-based and which aims to
6
remedy temporary interruptions in funding flows and ensure continuity of investments in the social sectors, eligible costs include on-going investment contracts and maintenance costs (excluding certain personnel costs), financial costs, taxes and non-cash items such as depreciation.
In the case of EU Co-Financing Facility (“ECF”) loans, eligible costs are those defined by the relevant EU regulations or fund-specific rules, as complemented by national rules. ECF loans were introduced as one of the CEB’s new financing instruments by the Development Plan 2014–2016 and are intended to facilitate the absorption and use of available EU grants by the Bank’s Member States for addressing their social investment needs in the CEB’s sectors of action.
High social value projects financed by the Bank may, upon proposal by the Governor, benefit from an interest rate subsidy or receive technical assistance, grants or guarantees from the Social Dividend Account (“SDA”), formerly known as the Selective Trust Account. On an exceptional basis, the SDA can also provide grant contributions in the form of donations responding to emergency situations or as a contribution to a common cause in the Member State.
The SDA is a special account that was first established in 1995 to provide interest rate subsidies and grants in eligible countries for eligible projects. With a view to increasing the CEB’s social added value, the SDA’s scope was expanded in March 2013 and it now also provides financing for project-related technical assistance and guarantees. The SDA is funded with allocations received from the Bank’s Member States through dividends allocated upon appropriation of the Bank’s profit. It may also be funded by voluntary contributions from the Bank’s Member States or the member states of the Council of Europe. Interest rate subsidies, grants, technical assistance and guarantees from the SDA are approved on a case-by-case basis by the Administrative Council. The SDA is aimed at priority groups such as refugees, displaced populations, migrants or populations affected by natural or ecological disasters, and vulnerable groups such as populations living below the poverty threshold (defined as less than 60% of the national average income), abandoned children, children in vulnerable situations, persons with disabilities and ethnic minorities.
For more information regarding the SDA see Note K (“Social Dividend Account (SDA)”) to the Bank’s audited financial statements.
Approval process for financing
Applications for project financing, which may in certain instances be prepared with the technical assistance of the Bank, are sent to the Secretary General of the Council of Europe and the Governor of the CEB. The application must be accompanied by a letter of transmittal from the Member State requesting financing, and, if the requesting Member State approves a project in favor of a third party country, the latter will be asked to send a letter of consent to the Secretariat of the Partial Agreement allowing the CEB to monitor the project in accordance with its procedures. Upon receipt of the letter(s) and the application, the Council of Europe evaluates the proposal and prepares an opinion as to the project’s conformity with the political and social aims of the Council of Europe. This opinion helps to ensure the coherence of CEB’s activities with the social goals of the Council of Europe. In parallel, the Governor of the Bank prepares a loan document, i.e., a project presentation report concerning the technical and financial aspects of the project. The loan document describes the borrower and the project and contains the financial elements required to assess the credit risk linked to the borrower and, where applicable, to the guarantor. The social value of each project is evaluated based on a comprehensive “two-pronged” approach assigning both (i) a project/program rating which assesses the social value of the project per se and (ii) a country rating which reflects the socio-economic situation of the country in which the project is located. Contributing to improving the screening of projects, this approach allows the Bank to closely measure the social value of each of its projects and their anticipated social outcomes. A qualitative evaluation of the credit risk and the risks linked to the project’s implementation is presented in the conclusion to the report. The Governor’s project presentation report and the Council of Europe’s opinion are then examined by the Administrative Council that evaluates and approves each loan application according to eligibility criteria defined in the Policy. In addition, projects with borrowers that have, through previous co-operation with the CEB, demonstrated a clear mandate, well-established and effective operational and financial policies and procedures, and the capacity to provide timely and comprehensive reports to CEB on the relevant financial, physical and social aspects of project implementation, may benefit from the “Conditional Financing Instrument” procedures, which allow for adjusted on-site monitoring procedures.
Project Monitoring
The Bank carries out technical and administrative monitoring of projects from approval to completion, including evaluation of a sample of completed projects by the CEB’s independent Evaluation Department. Monitoring is intended to ensure that the project is carried out in accordance with the loan application approved by the Administrative Council when examining the project and with the agreements entered into between the parties.
In principle, an on-site project monitoring mission is organized by the CEB at least once in the project life cycle. In certain cases, external consultants may be called upon to assist in the monitoring. For each review, a mission report is prepared, the conclusions of which may be communicated to the borrower. The borrower is also required to provide monitoring reports at least once
7
a year and prior to any disbursement, with the exception of the first tranche. This report is prepared by the borrower (or by the project manager, if applicable) using the standard tables attached as an appendix to the applicable framework loan agreement. The Bank prepares an Annual Monitoring Report that examines the results of the monitoring missions carried out in the course of the previous year, analyzes the project monitoring and completion reports provided by each borrower and makes proposals for improving project management. This Annual Monitoring Report is presented to the CEB’s Administrative Council. The Secretariat of the Partial Agreement also prepares an annual report on each project’s social impact. In addition, upon completion of a project, each borrower is required to submit a final report to the Bank presenting a review of the project’s results.
In addition, the Evaluation Department carries out independent ex-post evaluations of a sample number of operations (projects and programs) in line with international evaluation standards and practices in other multilateral development banks, and submits resulting evaluation reports jointly with its Annual Activity Report through the Governor to the Administrative Council.
Development Plan 2014–2016
The Development Plan 2014–2016, as proposed by the Governor and recommended by the Administrative Council, was unanimously approved by the Governing Board on November 22, 2013. The Plan, which took effect on January 1, 2014, seeks to strengthen the Bank’s mission of supporting social investments and its role as a major instrument of solidarity policy in Europe promoting the values of the Council of Europe.
The Development Plan 2014–2016 focuses the Bank’s action on five strategic areas: (i) enhancing support to social investments with additional technical assistance and greater flexibility; (ii) strengthening co-operation with EU funds at the country level; (iii) contributing to bridge the funding gap in the social sectors; (iv) increasing support for job creation and preservation and (v) examining and developing innovative approaches for additional lending and non-lending activities.
The Development Plan 2014–2016 introduces new financing instruments and adapts the existing instruments in order to respond more efficiently to the needs of CEB’s Member States, especially given that the consequences of the financial and economic crisis have negatively impacted social cohesion, human capital and the development potential of future generations.
In particular, the support that the CEB has repeatedly provided over recent years to programs financed by EU funds has now been formally highlighted with the introduction of the ECF. This new CEB funding tool better articulates with the characteristics of EU Funds and is applicable both within member states of the EU and beyond.
The PFF, intended for public entities whose funding is primarily budget-based, aims to remedy temporary flaws in funding flows and ensure continuity of investments in the social sectors throughout the period of implementation. These new instruments have been included in the provisions of the CEB’s revised Policy for Loan and Project Financing.
The Development Plan 2014-2016 further reinforces the on-going support to job creation and preservation in MSMEs, which constitutes a major tool at the Bank’s disposal in its efforts to strengthen social cohesion across its membership base and consolidate the value added of its operations.
Concomitantly, efforts are being expanded in favor of operations in Central, Eastern and Southeastern European countries. Notably, enhanced cooperation with the EU, other multilateral development institutions and donor countries will be of particular importance.
The CEB also continuously considers additional ways to increase the added value of CEB financing through potential cooperation with the private sector (such as private-public partnerships), through risk-sharing mechanisms (especially in support of micro-credit) and through further diversification of CEB’s non-lending activities.
Alongside the Development Plan 2014–2016, the CEB also adopted a revised prudential framework that took effect on January 1, 2014. It serves to underpin the main tenets of the new development plan, as it provides the necessary tools for addressing the new risks prevailing in the current economic and financial environment that will continue to require a rigorous risk management policy. For additional information on the Bank’s revised prudential framework, see “Risk Management—Prudential Framework”.
8
CAPITALIZATION AND INDEBTEDNESS
The following table sets forth the CEB’s capitalization and indebtedness as of December 31, 2014. It does not otherwise give effect to any transaction since that date. Since December 31, 2014, there has been no material change in the capitalization of CEB, except for the issuance of:
(a) | GBP 250 million (approximately €337 million based on the exchange rate at the time of the issuance) 1.250% notes due 2019 under CEB’s Euro Medium Term Note Program in February 2015; and |
(b) | USD 1 billion (approximately €893 million based on the exchange rate at the time of the issuance) 1.625% notes due 2020 under CEB’s SEC registered U.S. debt shelf program in March 2015. |
As of December 31, 2014 |
||||
(in thousands of euros) | ||||
Short-term Debt(1) |
4,763,378 | |||
Long-term Debt(2) |
14,710,892 | |||
Equity |
||||
Capital(3) |
||||
Subscribed |
5,472,219 | |||
Uncalled |
(4,859,802 | ) | ||
Called |
612,417 | |||
General Reserve(4) |
1,895,119 | |||
Gains or losses recognized directly in equity |
(96,501 | ) | ||
Net profit |
134,439 | |||
Total Equity |
2,545,474 | |||
Total Capitalization(5) |
17,256,366 | |||
|
|
(1) | See “Financial Review—Balance Sheet—Funding”. Consists of current portion of long-term debt plus existing debt securities with a maturity of less than one year as of the issue date, excluding accrued interest and value adjustment of debt securities hedged by derivatives. |
(2) | See “Financial Review—Balance Sheet—Funding”. Consists of non-current portion of debt securities with a maturity of more than one year as of the issue date, excluding accrued interest and value adjustment of debt securities hedged by derivatives. None of the CEB’s debt is guaranteed by other parties or secured. |
(3) | See “Capital Structure—Subscribed, Called and Uncalled Capital”. |
(4) | The CEB’s general reserve represents retained earnings and a portion of the contributions paid in by new Member States upon accession. See “Capital Structure—Reserves”. |
(5) | Total capitalization consists of long-term debt and total equity. |
9
Subscribed, Called and Uncalled Capital
Any European state (member or non-member state of the Council of Europe) may, in principle, become a Member State of the Bank. Each Member State of the Bank is required to subscribe to the Bank’s capital. The amount of capital required to be subscribed by the applicant as a percentage of total subscribed capital is equivalent to the applicant’s anticipated percentage contribution to the budget of the Partial Agreement on the CEB. This amount results from comparing the gross domestic product and the population of the applicant country to those of all Member States combined, with the weighting given to gross domestic product being five times that given to population.
The Bank issues participating certificates, each with a nominal value of €1,000, to its Member States. The number of certificates to be held by each Member State is fixed by the Governing Board and represents that Member State’s subscribed capital. At any given time, however, each Member State is required to pay in only a portion of the subscribed capital represented by its certificates. The minimum percentage of subscribed capital to be paid in is fixed by the Governing Board: currently, it is fixed at 11.1%. Total subscribed capital paid-in and to be paid-in is referred to as “called capital”. Subscribed capital not paid in remains subject to capital calls by the Governing Board. The difference between the subscribed capital and the called capital is referred to as “uncalled capital”.
Although the Member States do not guarantee the CEB’s obligations, the Governing Board may make calls upon subscribed and unpaid capital in order to enable the CEB to meet its obligations, including repaying the Bank’s indebtedness. Since the CEB’s inception, no such calls have been made. In addition, the Governing Board may decide to increase the Bank’s subscribed capital, in which case it sets forth the conditions of such increase, including the percentage of such increased subscribed capital to be paid in and the corresponding payment dates. Capital increases only become effective once the conditions set forth by the Governing Board for such increase have been satisfied (such as a minimum percentage of the capital increase being subscribed). Member States are not required to subscribe to capital increases.
The Bank has had six capital increases since 1956. The CEB launched its sixth capital increase in February 2011, for which the subscription rate was 98%. At December 31, 2014, the Bank’s subscribed capital amounted to €5.5 billion, stable compared to year-end 2013. After profit allocation, the CEB’s own funds (subscribed capital, reserves, gains or losses recognized directly in equity and profit for the year) have increased from €7.3 billion at year-end 2013 to €7.4 billion at year-end 2014, as a result of an increase in general reserves by full allocation to such reserves of the 2014 net profit.
10
Capital allocation by Member State, as of December 31, 2014, is presented in the table below:
CAPITAL ALLOCATION
In thousand euros | ||||||||||||||||
Members |
Subscribed capital |
Uncalled capital |
Called capital |
Percentage of subscribed capital |
||||||||||||
France |
915,770 | 814,114 | 101,656 | 16.735 | % | |||||||||||
Germany |
915,770 | 814,114 | 101,656 | 16.735 | % | |||||||||||
Italy |
915,770 | 814,114 | 101,656 | 16.735 | % | |||||||||||
Spain |
597,257 | 530,958 | 66,299 | 10.914 | % | |||||||||||
Turkey |
388,299 | 345,197 | 43,102 | 7.096 | % | |||||||||||
Netherlands |
198,813 | 176,743 | 22,070 | 3.633 | % | |||||||||||
Belgium |
164,321 | 146,083 | 18,238 | 3.003 | % | |||||||||||
Greece |
164,321 | 146,083 | 18,238 | 3.003 | % | |||||||||||
Portugal |
139,172 | 123,724 | 15,448 | 2.543 | % | |||||||||||
Sweden |
139,172 | 123,724 | 15,448 | 2.543 | % | |||||||||||
Poland |
128,260 | 114,023 | 14,237 | 2.344 | % | |||||||||||
Denmark |
89,667 | 79,712 | 9,955 | 1.639 | % | |||||||||||
Finland |
69,786 | 62,039 | 7,747 | 1.275 | % | |||||||||||
Norway |
69,786 | 62,039 | 7,747 | 1.275 | % | |||||||||||
Bulgaria |
62,459 | 55,526 | 6,933 | 1.141 | % | |||||||||||
Romania |
59,914 | 53,264 | 6,650 | 1.095 | % | |||||||||||
Switzerland |
53,824 | 43,229 | 10,595 | 0.984 | % | |||||||||||
Ireland |
48,310 | 42,948 | 5,362 | 0.883 | % | |||||||||||
Hungary |
44,788 | 39,816 | 4,972 | 0.818 | % | |||||||||||
Czech Republic |
43,037 | 38,260 | 4,777 | 0.786 | % | |||||||||||
Luxembourg |
34,734 | 30,878 | 3,856 | 0.635 | % | |||||||||||
Serbia |
25,841 | 22,973 | 2,868 | 0.472 | % | |||||||||||
Croatia |
21,376 | 19,003 | 2,373 | 0.391 | % | |||||||||||
Cyprus |
19,882 | 17,676 | 2,206 | 0.363 | % | |||||||||||
Slovak Republic |
18,959 | 16,854 | 2,105 | 0.346 | % | |||||||||||
Albania |
13,385 | 11,899 | 1,486 | 0.245 | % | |||||||||||
Latvia |
12,808 | 11,387 | 1,421 | 0.234 | % | |||||||||||
Estonia |
12,723 | 11,311 | 1,412 | 0.233 | % | |||||||||||
“the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia” |
12,723 | 11,311 | 1,412 | 0.233 | % | |||||||||||
Lithuania |
12,588 | 11,191 | 1,397 | 0.230 | % | |||||||||||
Slovenia |
12,295 | 10,930 | 1,365 | 0.225 | % | |||||||||||
Iceland |
10,144 | 9,018 | 1,126 | 0.185 | % | |||||||||||
Malta |
10,144 | 9,018 | 1,126 | 0.185 | % | |||||||||||
Georgia |
9,876 | 8,780 | 1,096 | 0.180 | % | |||||||||||
Bosnia and Herzegovina |
9,689 | 8,614 | 1,075 | 0.177 | % | |||||||||||
Montenegro |
6,584 | 5,853 | 731 | 0.120 | % | |||||||||||
Kosovo |
6,559 | 5,831 | 728 | 0.120 | % | |||||||||||
Moldova (Republic of) |
5,488 | 4,878 | 610 | 0.100 | % | |||||||||||
San Marino |
4,867 | 4,206 | 661 | 0.089 | % | |||||||||||
Liechtenstein |
2,921 | 2,374 | 547 | 0.053 | % | |||||||||||
Holy See |
137 | 107 | 30 | 0.003 | % | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total 2014 |
5,472,219 | 4,859,802 | 612,417 | 100.000 | % | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total 2013 |
5,472,219 | 4,859,802 | 612,417 | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
The CEB’s general reserves are derived principally from the Bank’s profit. Acting upon annual recommendations of the Administrative Council and final resolutions of the Governing Board, the Bank has historically allocated substantially all of its profits towards reserves. In addition, reserves have increased over the years as a result of the accession of new Member States, which are not only required to subscribe to the Bank’s capital and to contribute the amount required to be paid in, but also to contribute to the general reserves in proportion to their share in the capital. For a discussion of Kosovo’s subscribed and paid-in capital and contribution to reserves in connection with its accession to the CEB, see Note M to the Bank’s audited financial statements.
At year-end 2014, reserves increased to €1.90 billion compared to €1.78 billion at year-end 2013 as a result of €111 million of profit allocated to the general reserves.
12
The CEB aims to contribute to the strengthening of social cohesion in Europe through long-term lending to governments, local and regional authorities, public and private financial institutions and other public and private legal entities approved by a Member State. The Bank’s activities have broadened and shifted since its founding in 1956, when its statutory priorities were to provide aid to refugees and migrants and support projects related to natural or ecological disasters. At various times over the course of its history, the CEB has focused on social housing for low-income persons, vocational training, improving living conditions in urban and rural areas, infrastructure improvement and employment. Today, the CEB’s projects and loans activity is structured around four “sectoral lines of action”, each consisting of sectors of action as follows:
• | “Strengthening social integration”, which includes: |
• | aid to refugees, migrants and displaced persons; |
• | housing for low-income persons; and |
• | improvement of living conditions in urban and rural areas; |
• | “Managing the environment”, which includes: |
• | natural or ecological disasters; |
• | protection of the environment; and |
• | protection and rehabilitation of historic and cultural heritage; |
• | “Supporting public infrastructure with a social vocation”, which includes: |
• | health; |
• | education and vocational training; and |
• | infrastructure of administrative and judicial public services; and |
• | “Supporting micro, small and medium-size enterprises”, which includes: |
• | creation and preservation of viable jobs. |
In organizing its diverse project and loan activity around these sectoral lines of action, the Bank aims to present its activities in a clear manner and demonstrate its unwavering commitment in favor of sustainable social development.
The shift in and expansion of the Bank’s social objectives have been accompanied by a changing geographic focus. When first formed by its 8 founding Member States, the Bank’s activities were primarily concentrated in Germany, France, Italy, Greece, Turkey and Cyprus. During the late 1970s and 1980s, as the Bank’s membership base expanded so did its geographical reach, in particular to the countries of Southern Europe, such as Spain, Portugal and Yugoslavia. The end of the Cold War prompted a new wave of countries adhering to the institution and consequently permitted increased lending to Central and Eastern Europe. Today, the Bank’s resources are focused in part on Central and Southeastern Europe, which includes the Bank’s Target Countries. At year-end 2014, 59% of loans outstanding were in favor of Target Countries.
Overview of CEB’s Lending Activities
The tables below summarize the CEB’s lending activity in terms of project amounts approved and loans disbursed by sectoral line of action and by country of the borrower over the past two years, as well as the five-year cumulative totals over the 2010–2014 period. Because the Bank’s policies and procedures generally result in loans being approved and disbursed in different years, amounts approved and amounts disbursed in any given year do not necessarily relate to the same projects.
Projects approved are projects that have been submitted to the Administrative Council and approved for funding. Loans disbursed are loans that have actually been paid to the borrower.
PROJECTS APPROVED
per country and per sectoral line of action |
in thousand euros | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Country | 2014 | 2013 | Accumulated total 2010–2014 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Amounts | % | Amounts | % | Amounts | % | |||||||||||||||||||
Albania |
44,630 | 2.2 | 44,630 | 0.4 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Belgium |
100,000 | 4.8 | 200,000 | 8.8 | 1,060,000 | 10.1 | ||||||||||||||||||
Bosnia and Herzegovina |
7,500 | 0.4 | 70,000 | 3.1 | 147,700 | 1.4 | ||||||||||||||||||
Bulgaria |
35,000 | 1.7 | 30,000 | 1.3 | 130,000 | 1.2 |
13
per country and per sectoral line of action |
in thousand euros | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Country | 2014 | 2013 | Accumulated total 2010–2014 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Amounts | % | Amounts | % | Amounts | % | |||||||||||||||||||
Croatia |
40,000 | 1.9 | 100,000 | 4.4 | 351,480 | 3.3 | ||||||||||||||||||
Cyprus |
— | — | — | — | 265,000 | 2.5 | ||||||||||||||||||
Czech Republic |
220,000 | 10.7 | 50,000 | 2.2 | 370,000 | 3.5 | ||||||||||||||||||
Finland |
60,000 | 2.9 | 110,000 | 4.8 | 270,000 | 2.6 | ||||||||||||||||||
France |
239,800 | 11.6 | 307,900 | 13.5 | 1,247,700 | 11.9 | ||||||||||||||||||
Georgia |
— | — | 30,942 | 1.4 | 102,661 | 1.0 | ||||||||||||||||||
Germany |
— | — | 100,000 | 4.4 | 347,500 | 3.3 | ||||||||||||||||||
Hungary |
50,000 | 2.4 | 76,500 | 3.4 | 401,500 | 3.8 | ||||||||||||||||||
Ireland |
— | — | 41,000 | 1.8 | 166,000 | 1.6 | ||||||||||||||||||
Italy |
— | — | 6,000 | 0.3 | 6,000 | 0.1 | ||||||||||||||||||
Lithuania |
100,000 | 4.8 | — | — | 100,000 | 1.0 | ||||||||||||||||||
Moldova (Republic of) |
10,000 | 0.5 | 39,000 | 1.7 | 62,400 | 0.6 | ||||||||||||||||||
Montenegro |
8,000 | 0.4 | 10,000 | 0.4 | 43,000 | 0.4 | ||||||||||||||||||
Poland |
250,000 | 12.1 | 206,667 | 9.1 | 1,329,067 | 12.6 | ||||||||||||||||||
Portugal |
15,000 | 0.7 | — | — | 115,000 | 1.1 | ||||||||||||||||||
Romania |
50,000 | 2.4 | 75,000 | 3.3 | 305,000 | 2.9 | ||||||||||||||||||
Serbia |
8,000 | 0.4 | 20,000 | 0.9 | 268,500 | 2.6 | ||||||||||||||||||
Slovak Republic |
150,000 | 7.3 | 80,000 | 3.5 | 515,000 | 4.9 | ||||||||||||||||||
Slovenia |
— | — | 95,000 | 4.2 | 135,000 | 1.3 | ||||||||||||||||||
Spain |
330,000 | 16.0 | 408,000 | 17.9 | 1,436,000 | 13.6 | ||||||||||||||||||
“the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia” |
97,000 | 4.7 | 8,000 | 0.4 | 185,000 | 1.7 | ||||||||||||||||||
Turkey |
250,000 | 12.1 | 210,000 | 9.2 | 1,110,000 | 10.6 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
TOTAL |
2,064,930 | 100.0 | 2,274,009 | 100.0 | 10,514,138 | 100.0 |
Sectoral line of action(1) | 2014 | 2013 | Accumulated total 2010–2014 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Amounts | % | Amounts | % | Amounts | % | |||||||||||||||||||
Strengthening social integration |
421,300 | 20.4 | 560,167 | 24.7 | 2,893,997 | 27.5 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Aid to refugees, migrants and displaced persons |
— | — | 61,500 | 2.7 | 141,500 | 1.3 | ||||||||||||||||||
Housing for low-income persons |
195,000 | 9.4 | 300,000 | 13.2 | 1,345,700 | 12.8 | ||||||||||||||||||
Improvement of living conditions in urban and rural areas |
226,300 | 11.0 | 198,667 | 8.8 | 1,406,797 | 13.4 | ||||||||||||||||||
Managing the environment |
386,000 | 18.7 | 53,000 | 2.3 | 1,607,850 | 15.3 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Natural or ecological disasters |
298,000 | 14.4 | — | — | 850,000 | 8.1 | ||||||||||||||||||
Protection of the environment |
88,000 | 4.3 | 53,000 | 2.3 | 685,550 | 6.5 | ||||||||||||||||||
Protection and rehabilitation of historic and cultural heritage |
— | — | — | — | 72,300 | 0.7 | ||||||||||||||||||
Supporting public infrastructure with a social vocation |
502,130 | 24.3 | 518,900 | 22.8 | 2,303,830 | 21.9 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Health |
143,530 | 7.0 | 173,000 | 7.6 | 824,790 | 7.8 | ||||||||||||||||||
Education and vocational training |
298,800 | 14.4 | 265,900 | 11.7 | 987,900 | 9.4 | ||||||||||||||||||
Infrastructure of administrative and judicial public services |
59,800 | 2.9 | 80,000 | 3.5 | 491,140 | 4.7 | ||||||||||||||||||
Supporting micro, small and medium-sized enterprises (MSMEs)(2) |
755,500 | 36.6 | 1,141,942 | 50.2 | 3,708,461 | 35.3 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
TOTAL |
2,064,930 | 100.0 | 2,274,009 | 100.0 | 10,514,138 | 100.0 |
(1) | Amounts as estimated at the time of project approval. |
(2) | Established as a separate line of action following the adoption of Administrative Council Resolution 1562 (2013). |
14
LOANS DISBURSED(1)
per country and per sectoral line of action |
in thousand euros | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Country | 2014 | 2013 | Total 2010–2014 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Amounts | % | Amounts | % | Amounts | % | |||||||||||||||||||
Albania |
— | — | 2,789 | 0.2 | 57,907 | 0.7 | ||||||||||||||||||
Belgium |
177,500 | 10.2 | 137,500 | 7.5 | 875,000 | 9.9 | ||||||||||||||||||
Bosnia and Herzegovina |
14,900 | 0.9 | 7,000 | 0.4 | 24,205 | 0.3 | ||||||||||||||||||
Bulgaria |
25,000 | 1.4 | 2,500 | 0.1 | 82,500 | 0.9 | ||||||||||||||||||
Croatia |
29,500 | 1.7 | 51,874 | 2.8 | 181,693 | 2.1 | ||||||||||||||||||
Cyprus |
35,000 | 2.0 | 33,000 | 1.8 | 275,836 | 3.1 | ||||||||||||||||||
Czech Republic |
115,000 | 6.6 | 52,563 | 2.8 | 178,405 | 2.0 | ||||||||||||||||||
Estonia |
— | — | — | — | 28,800 | 0.3 | ||||||||||||||||||
Finland |
60,000 | 3.4 | — | — | 160,000 | 1.8 | ||||||||||||||||||
France |
158,000 | 9.1 | 310,841 | 16.8 | 816,341 | 9.2 | ||||||||||||||||||
Georgia |
5,610 | 0.3 | — | — | 5,610 | 0.1 | ||||||||||||||||||
Germany(2) |
7,800 | 0.4 | 117,600 | 6.4 | 509,763 | 5.8 | ||||||||||||||||||
Hungary |
56,967 | 3.3 | 6,320 | 0.3 | 588,705 | 6.7 | ||||||||||||||||||
Iceland |
— | — | — | — | 31,305 | 0.4 | ||||||||||||||||||
Ireland |
20,000 | 1.1 | 50,000 | 2.7 | 70,000 | 0.8 | ||||||||||||||||||
Italy |
2,850 | 0.2 | — | — | 138,850 | 1.6 | ||||||||||||||||||
Lithuania |
— | — | 47,000 | 2.5 | 102,000 | 1.2 | ||||||||||||||||||
Moldova (Republic of) |
3,067 | 0.2 | 6,972 | 0.4 | 14,667 | 0.2 | ||||||||||||||||||
Montenegro |
— | — | — | — | 10,000 | 0.1 | ||||||||||||||||||
Poland |
285,901 | 16.4 | 315,094 | 17.1 | 1,412,803 | 16.0 | ||||||||||||||||||
Portugal |
— | — | — | — | 205,000 | 2.3 | ||||||||||||||||||
Romania |
18,900 | 1.1 | 40,050 | 2.2 | 423,081 | 4.8 | ||||||||||||||||||
Serbia |
21,255 | 1.2 | 34,340 | 1.9 | 93,547 | 1.1 | ||||||||||||||||||
Slovak Republic |
85,000 | 4.9 | 72,500 | 3.9 | 240,752 | 2.7 | ||||||||||||||||||
Slovenia |
— | — | — | — | 74,000 | 0.8 | ||||||||||||||||||
Spain |
395,000 | 22.6 | 295,000 | 16.0 | 1,123,000 | 12.7 | ||||||||||||||||||
Sweden |
— | — | — | — | 56,200 | 0.6 | ||||||||||||||||||
“the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia” |
15,797 | 0.9 | 11,491 | 0.6 | 54,176 | 0.6 | ||||||||||||||||||
Turkey |
212,705 | 12.1 | 251,032 | 13.6 | 988,746 | 11.2 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
TOTAL |
1,745,752 | 100.0 | 1,845,466 | 100.0 | 8,822,892 | 100.0 |
Sectoral line of action | 2014 | 2013 | Total 2010–2014 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Amounts | % | Amounts | % | Amounts | % | |||||||||||||||||||
Strengthening social integration |
430,302 | 24.6 | 516,932 | 28.0 | 2,622,200 | 29.7 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Aid to refugees, migrants and displaced persons |
21,500 | 1.2 | 49,320 | 2.7 | 96,017 | 1.1 | ||||||||||||||||||
Housing for low-income persons |
191,236 | 11.0 | 243,115 | 13.2 | 1,262,615 | 14.3 | ||||||||||||||||||
Improvement of living conditions in urban and rural areas |
217,566 | 12.4 | 224,497 | 12.1 | 1,263,568 | 14.3 | ||||||||||||||||||
Managing the environment |
304,336 | 17.4 | 266,219 | 14.4 | 1,806,515 | 20.5 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Natural or ecological disasters |
130,000 | 7.4 | 137,000 | 7.4 | 628,600 | 7.1 | ||||||||||||||||||
Protection of the environment |
171,100 | 9.8 | 123,235 | 6.7 | 1,123,198 | 12.8 | ||||||||||||||||||
Protection and rehabilitation of historic and cultural heritage |
3,236 | 0.2 | 5,984 | 0.3 | 54,717 | 0.6 | ||||||||||||||||||
Supporting public infrastructure with a social vocation |
315,252 | 18.1 | 361,395 | 19.6 | 1,707,119 | 19.3 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Health |
140,838 | 8.1 | 171,428 | 9.3 | 610,237 | 6.9 | ||||||||||||||||||
Education and vocational training |
139,011 | 8.0 | 185,674 | 10.1 | 1,048,049 | 11.9 | ||||||||||||||||||
Infrastructure of administrative and judicial public services |
35,403 | 2.0 | 4,293 | 0.2 | 48,833 | 0.5 | ||||||||||||||||||
Supporting micro, small and medium-sized enterprises (MSMEs)(3) |
695,862 | 39.9 | 700,920 | 38.0 | 2,687,058 | 30.5 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
TOTAL |
1,745,752 | 100.0 | 1,845,466 | 100.0 | 8,822,892 | 100.0 |
15
(1) | After January 1, 2012, loans in currencies other than euro are converted at the exchange rate at the disbursement date rather than the exchange rate at the financial statement date. For comparison purposes, historical data have been recalculated in this fashion and can differ from previously published data. |
(2) | In favor of Target Countries (2014) and €2.6 million in 2013. |
(3) | Established as a separate line of action following the adoption of Administrative Council Resolution 1562 (2013). |
NB: | Information regarding amounts disbursed reflects the location of the registered office of the borrower and not that of the ultimate beneficiary, who may be based in another country. Consequently, the figures provide information on the risk profile of the Bank’s borrowers and not that of the ultimate beneficiaries of its lending operations. |
Strengthening Social Integration
The sectoral line of action “strengthening social integration” is composed of three sectors of action:
• | Aid to refugees, migrants and displaced persons. Projects in this sector consist, among others, of reconstruction and repair of reception facilities (such as reception centers, temporary and permanent social housing); preventive and curative medicine programs; education and vocational training programs; and the financing of technical infrastructure and basic amenities required in response to emergencies. |
• | Housing for low income persons. Activities in this sector include, among others, providing adequate housing for low-income persons in urban and rural areas; the construction of infrastructure such as water supply, collection and treatment of wastewater; the construction of accommodation for the elderly that enable medical treatment; or the renovation of student residences. |
• | Improvement of living conditions in urban and rural areas. Projects in this sector include, among others, improvement of living conditions in neighborhoods or cities lacking in infrastructure, including social and cultural amenities. In rural areas, the Bank finances projects that target regions characterized by low population density or activities in sectors such as agriculture, forestry, aquaculture and fishing, as defined by national legislation. |
Managing the Environment
The sectoral line of action “managing the environment” is composed of three sectors of action:
• | Natural or ecological disasters. Projects in this sector mostly consist of the reconstruction or rehabilitation of destroyed or damaged public structures and basic infrastructure facilities such as water supply, the treatment of wastewater and solid waste, electricity and gas supplies. Operational material and equipment for emergency operations can also be eligible for CEB financing. The CEB aims to provide national and local authorities with assistance in the reconstruction of the disaster-affected areas and to develop means for the prevention of natural or ecological disasters, in particular floods, fires, avalanches, earthquakes and landslides. |
• | Protection of the environment. Projects in this sector involve, among others, reduction and treatment of solid and liquid waste; clean-up and protection of surface and underground water; protection against noise; production of renewable energy and reduction of air pollution, excluding installations of an industrial nature; protection and development of biodiversity; and cleaner transport networks. |
• | Protection and rehabilitation of historic and cultural heritage. Projects in this sector are aimed at the protection and the rehabilitation of elements of historic and cultural heritage classified as such by UNESCO or by the relevant Member State of the Bank. |
Supporting Public Infrastructure with a Social Vocation
The sectoral line of action “Supporting public infrastructure with a social vocation” is composed of three sectors of action:
• | Health. Financing of projects in the health sector involves, among others, the construction, renovation and modernization of health infrastructure such as hospitals, neighborhood healthcare centers (including those specialized in providing assistance to vulnerable target groups, such as populations living below the poverty threshold, abandoned children, children in vulnerable situations, persons with disabilities and ethnic minorities) or centers specializing in healthcare for the elderly and the disabled. |
16
• | Education and vocational training. Projects in this sector involve the financing of the construction and modernization of primary and secondary schools, university and vocational training infrastructure as well as the provision of teaching equipment. The CEB finances programs providing assistance in the training of specialized staff in the social and education sectors as well as professional retraining programs in declining economic sectors. |
• | Infrastructure of administrative and judicial public services. This sector focuses on financing projects for the construction, rehabilitation or transformation of infrastructure or buildings intended for public services. These projects are designed to contribute to the improvement of the organization and functioning of the Member States’ administrative and judicial public services. |
Supporting Micro, Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises
The sectoral line of action “Supporting micro, small and medium-sized enterprises” is composed of one sector of action:
• | Creation and preservation of viable jobs. This sector aims to create and preserve jobs by facilitating access to credit for MSMEs, as well as for entities exercising a craft activity or for family businesses. |
17
SELECTED FINANCIAL INFORMATION
The following selected financial information as of and for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013, 2012, 2011, and 2010 has been derived from the CEB’s audited financial statements for those periods. The financial statements as of and for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012 were audited by KPMG Audit, a division of KPMG S.A. The audit was conducted in accordance with International Standards on Auditing as issued by the International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board. The financial statements as of and for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010 were audited by the Bank’s previous independent external auditors.
The CEB’s financial statements have been prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”) as adopted by the European Union (“IFRS-EU”). IFRS-EU differ in certain respects from the IFRS as published by the International Accounting Standards Board. The selected financial information should be read in conjunction with the Bank’s audited financial statements and notes thereto and with the section entitled “Financial Review”.
Year ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||
2010 | 2011(8) | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | ||||||||||||||||
(In thousands of euros, except ratios) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Selected Profit and Loss Account Data |
||||||||||||||||||||
Interest and similar income |
268,283 | 394,205 | 304,046 | 210,944 | 224,493 | |||||||||||||||
Interest expenses and similar charges |
(131,698 | ) | (253,257 | ) | (146,442 | ) | (47,325 | ) | (54,877 | ) | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Interest margin |
136,585 | 140,948 | 157,604 | 163,619 | 169,616 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Net gains or losses from financial instruments at fair value through profit or loss(1) |
(1,050 | ) | 3,788 | (407 | ) | (7,716 | ) | (668 | ) | |||||||||||
Net gains or losses from available-for-sale financial assets |
62 | 54 | 58 | 49 | 48 | |||||||||||||||
Commissions |
(1,941 | ) | (1,556 | ) | (884 | ) | (830 | ) | (771 | ) | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Net banking income |
133,656 | 143,234 | 156,371 | 155,122 | 168,225 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
General operating expenses |
(32,062 | ) | (34,329 | ) | (33,908 | ) | (41,564 | ) | (31,229 | ) | ||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization charges of fixed assets |
(1,838 | ) | (1,993 | ) | (2,233 | ) | (2,269 | ) | (2,557 | ) | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Gross operating income |
99,756 | 106,912 | 120,230 | 111,289 | 134,439 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Cost of risk |
16,109 | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Net profit |
115,865 | 106,912 | 120,230 | 111,289 | 134,439 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||
2010 | 2011(8) | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | ||||||||||||||||
(In thousands of euros, except ratios) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Selected Balance Sheet Information |
||||||||||||||||||||
Assets |
||||||||||||||||||||
Cash in hand, balances with central banks |
230,316 | 242,980 | 327,373 | 286,640 | 203,897 | |||||||||||||||
Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss(1) |
1,216,278 | 1,658,168 | 1,200,675 | 441,961 | 1,275,571 | |||||||||||||||
Hedging derivative instruments |
1,226,344 | 1,224,143 | 1,402,383 | 949,003 | 1,103,889 | |||||||||||||||
Available-for-sale financial assets |
6,332,058 | 3,649,876 | 4,930,030 | 4,548,774 | 4,806,719 | |||||||||||||||
Loans to credit institutions and to customers(2) |
12,115,390 | 12,283,910 | 12,448,526 | 12,769,265 | 12,991,603 | |||||||||||||||
Advances to credit institutions and to customers(3) |
1,322,336 | 4,719,503 | 4,021,106 | 2,806,849 | 2,299,197 |
18
As of December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||
2010 | 2011(8) | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | ||||||||||||||||
(In thousands of euros, except ratios) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Financial assets held to maturity |
2,241,862 | 2,267,665 | 2,477,909 | 2,630,983 | 2,812,026 | |||||||||||||||
Other assets(4) |
36,422 | 36,937 | 49,574 | 51,317 | 52,479 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Total assets |
24,721,006 | 26,083,182 | 26,857,576 | 24,484,792 | 25,545,381 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Liabilities |
||||||||||||||||||||
Financial liabilities at fair value through profit or loss(1) |
1,275,923 | 587,231 | 428,908 | 656,290 | 177,430 | |||||||||||||||
Debt securities in issue |
19,855,536 | 20,958,367 | 21,558,288 | 20,087,248 | 20,472,364 | |||||||||||||||
Other liabilities(5) |
1,530,892 | 2,444,589 | 2,608,741 | 1,281,257 | 2,350,113 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Total liabilities |
22,662,351 | 23,990,187 | 24,595,937 | 22,024,795 | 22,999,907 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Total equity |
2,058,655 | 2,092,995 | 2,261,639 | 2,459,997 | 2,545,474 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Selected Operating Data |
||||||||||||||||||||
Loans outstanding at period end(6) |
11,987,963 | 12,074,990 | 12,131,049 | 12,581,931 | 12,567,539 |
As of December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||
2010 | 2011(8) | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | ||||||||||||||||
(In thousands of euros, except ratios) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Selected Balance Sheet Information |
||||||||||||||||||||
Loans disbursed during the period |
1,782,150 | 1,855,164 | 1,584,381 | 1,844,869 | 1,743,364 | |||||||||||||||
Selected Ratios(7) |
||||||||||||||||||||
Capital adequacy ratio Basel II/III |
— | — | — | 22.6 | % | 25.5 | % | |||||||||||||
Gearing ratio |
— | — | — | 1.72 | 1.67 | |||||||||||||||
Liquidity ratio |
— | — | — | 117.4 | % | 164.3 | % | |||||||||||||
Short-term liquidity ratio |
||||||||||||||||||||
1-month period |
— | — | — | 434 | % | 456 | % | |||||||||||||
3-month period |
— | — | — | 286 | % | 246 | % | |||||||||||||
6-month period |
— | — | — | 191 | % | 176 | % | |||||||||||||
1-year period |
— | — | — | 145 | % | 122 | % | |||||||||||||
Indebtedness ratio |
— | — | — | 7.77 | 6.95 | |||||||||||||||
Treasury asset ratio |
— | — | — | 3.90 | 3.35 |
(1) | Derivatives are by default considered to be transaction instruments, except if they can qualify as hedging instruments. They are recorded in the balance sheet under the line item “Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss” in cases of positive market value and under “Financial liabilities at fair value through profit or loss” when the market value is negative. Profit or losses are recorded in the profit and loss account under the line item “Net gains or losses from financial instruments at fair value through profit or loss”. |
(2) | Loans to credit institutions and to customers consist of non-derivative financial assets with fixed or determinable payments that are not quoted in an active market and that are not held for trading or intended to be sold when granted. |
(3) | Advances to credit institutions and to customers consist of interbank advances granted by the Bank and advances repayable on demand with credit institutions (other than central banks) that allow the Bank to settle and receive payments from financial transactions related to its activities. |
(4) | Includes tangible and intangible assets and other assets. |
(5) | Includes hedging derivative instruments, amounts owed to credit institutions and to customers, amounts in the Social Dividend Account, provisions and other liabilities (including deposits of guarantees received). |
(6) | Loans outstanding exclude accrued interest, IFRS fair value adjustments and loan depreciation. The amount of loan depreciation is immaterial as of December 31, 2014. |
(7) | For a description of these ratios and their use by the CEB, see “Risk Management—Prudential Framework”. A revised prudential framework was introduced effective January 1, 2014. Only the 2013 ratios have been restated according to the revised prudential |
19
framework for comparison purposes. The ratios presented are internal to the Bank’s risk management policy framework, may not correspond to similar ratios used by other multilateral development banks and are not required by statute, regulation or otherwise. The CEB is not subject to regulatory oversight by its Member States, to the Basel Committee Recommendations or to EU Directives. |
(8) | The CEB has applied the amended IAS 19 (Employee benefits) since January 1, 2012. In accordance with IAS 8, this change in accounting method has been applied retroactively for comparison purposes. As a result, the figures for the year ended December 31, 2011 have been restated in this table and throughout this document. |
20
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the CEB’s audited financial statements and notes thereto in Exhibit 2 of this annual report on Form 18-K.
As a development bank with a social vocation, the CEB does not operate with the objective of maximizing profit. The Bank makes every effort to obtain funds in the international capital markets on the best possible terms and to pass these advantages on to beneficiaries minus an intermediation margin to cover the Bank’s risk and general operating expenses. The CEB’s net banking income essentially derives from interest margin (see “Results of Operations” below). The Bank’s policy is to allocate substantially all of its profits towards general reserves, which may then be used to support increased lending activity.
In 2014 growth in Europe weakened, mainly due to the geopolitical climate. A slow recovery for the European economy is expected for 2015, but it will remain fragile. Despite this challenging environment, the CEB achieved its activity objectives with an overall satisfactory financial performance. For the first year of the Development Plan 2014-2016, the Bank successfully reached its targets, efficiently pursuing its social mandate in Europe. In this economic context, the Bank had liquidity reserves (which consist principally of cash-in-hand, balances with central banks, available-for-sale financial assets and advances to credit institutions and customers) at the end of 2014 of €7.3 billion, compared to €7.6 billion at December 31, 2013.
At December 31, 2014, the Bank’s outstanding loans (including accrued interest and IFRS fair value adjustments) amounted to €13.0 billion compared to €12.8 billion at December 31, 2013. Outstanding debt, including interest payable, used to support these operations amounted to €20.5 billion at December 31, 2014, compared to €20.1 billion at December 31, 2013.
The Bank’s net profit in 2014 was €134.4 million, compared to €111.3 million in 2013, with 2014 profits increasing by 20.8% compared to 2013. General reserves (after allocation of the Bank’s profit) increased by 7.1% to €2.03 billion at December 31, 2014 after having increased by 6.4% to €1.90 billion at December 31, 2013, mainly as a result of 2014 profit to be allocated to the general reserves. Equity increased to approximately €2.6 billion at December 31, 2014 from €2.5 billion at December 31, 2013.
The cost-to-income ratio (general operating expenses including depreciation and amortization charges of fixed assets divided by net banking income) decreased to 20.1% for the year ended December 31, 2014, compared to 28.3% for the year ended December 31, 2013, as a result of an increase in net banking income and a decline in general operating expenses.
Interest income
Interest income includes interest received on available-for-sale financial assets, financial assets held to maturity and loans and advances to credit institutions and customers. Interest income increased by €13.6 million in 2014 to €224.5 million compared to €210.9 million in 2013, principally as a result of an increase in interest on loans and advances to credit institutions and customers and to a lesser extent due to increases in interest on available-for-sale financial assets and on financial assets held to maturity.
Interest expense
Interest expense includes interest on outstanding debt securities in issue, amounts owed to credit institutions and customers and other interest expenses and similar charges. Interest expense increased by €7.6 million in 2014 to €54.9 million compared to €47.3 million in 2013, mainly due to an increase of interest expenses on debt securities in issue, in line with the trend of average market rates. In 2013, interest expenses included a provision of €1.4 million related to early departure measures in accordance with the provisions of the staff regulations.
Interest margin
Net interest margin increased by €6.0 million (3.7%) in 2014 to €169.6 million from €163.6 million in 2013, mainly as a result of an increase in the interest margin of the loan activity.
Net banking income
Net banking income increased by €13.1 million to €168.2 million in 2014 from €155.1 million in 2013, primarily as a result of an increase of €7.1 million in the change in the fair value of derivative financial instruments from negative €7.7 million in 2013 to negative €0.6 million in 2014 and due to a €6.0 million increase in the net interest margin.
General operating expenses
General operating expenses decreased by €10.3 million, or 24.9%, to €31.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2014 compared to €41.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2013. This decrease is mainly due to a revision, effective since 2014, of the employer contribution rate to medical coverage recognized as a past service gain amounting to €7.7 million. In addition, in 2013 general operating expenses included one-off costs associated with early departure measures amounting to €2.9 million.
21
As a result, core earnings (excluding material one-off effects and exceptional gains and losses) amounted to €127.4 million in 2014 compared to €123.0 million in 2013, an increase of 3.6%.
Year ended December 31, | ||||||||
2014 | 2013 | |||||||
(in millions of euros) | ||||||||
Net Profit (a) |
134.4 | 111.3 | ||||||
IFRS volatility impact from hedging derivatives instruments (IAS 39) (b) |
(0.7 | ) | (7.4 | ) | ||||
One-off effects |
||||||||
– change in contribution rate paid by the employer medical care (see note L in the financial statements) (c) |
7.7 | 0 | ||||||
– provision for early departure (remuneration, interest and service costs (IAS 19)) (d) |
0 | (4.3 | ) | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
CORE EARNINGS (a-b-c-d) |
127.4 | 123.0 |
Consequently, the adjusted cost-to-income ratio improved slightly from 24.6% in 2013 to 24.3% in 2014.
Cost of risk
The Bank recorded no cost of risk in 2014, as in 2013.
Overview
As of December 31, 2014, total assets amounted to €25,545 million compared to €24,485 million as of December 31, 2013, which represented an increase of 4.3%. Outstanding loans (excluding interest and value adjustments) reached €12,568 million as of December 31, 2014, remaining stable compared to €12,582 million at year-end 2013. Disbursements totaled €1,743 million, decreasing by 5.5% compared to €1,845 million in 2013. At the same time, repayments for 2014 amounted to €1,767 million compared to €1,348 million in 2013. In 2014, liquidity reserves decreased by 4.4% from €7,642 million at year-end 2013 to €7,310 million at year-end 2014 due to the significant decrease of 22.7% in money market deposits, from €2,686 million at December 31, 2013 to €2,077 million at December 31, 2014, which more than offset a slight increase in the available-for-sale financial assets of 5.7% from €4,549 million at year-end 2013 to €4,807 million at year-end 2014. Financial assets held to maturity developed in line with the limits fixed in the investment policy, reaching €2,812 million as of December 31, 2014, an increase of 6.9% compared to €2,631 million as of December 31, 2013.
As of December 31, 2014, total liabilities amounted to €23,000 million compared to €22,025 million as of December 31, 2013, which represents an increase of 4.4%. Borrowings and debt securities in issue (including interest and value adjustments) increased slightly to €20,572 million at year-end 2014, compared to €20,187 million at year-end 2013. Outstanding issues (including interest and value adjustments) with maturities of one year or more amounted to €20,472 million at year-end 2014 compared to €20,087 million at year-end 2013, and included new issues totaling €3,483 million and reimbursements totaling €3,981 million. Short-term issues of Euro Commercial Paper worth €923 million were outstanding at year-end 2013 while none were outstanding at year-end 2014. Other liabilities increased, mainly due to deposits of cash collateral received on contracts for hedging derivative financial instruments, by 179% from €402 million at year-end 2013 to €1,123 million at year-end 2014. The provision for post-employment benefits increased by €68 million, or 39.8%, from €171 million at December 31, 2013 to €239 million at December 31, 2014, mainly as a consequence of the change in the discounted interest rate index for the actuarial calculation of post-employment commitments, from 3.15% at year-end 2013 down to 1.50% at year- end 2014.
Equity totaled €2,545 million at year-end 2014, up 3.5% compared to year-end 2013. This increase resulted mainly from the positive variation in general reserves of €111.3 million (2013 profit allocated in 2014) and the 2014 net profit of €134.4 million, which more than offset the negative variation in gains or losses recognized directly in equity from minus €48 million in 2013 down to minus €97 million in 2014, mainly due to the actuarial valuation of the post-employment benefits.
Securities Portfolio
The Bank’s balance sheet assets include two securities portfolios: available-for-sale financial assets and financial assets held to maturity. The total value of these portfolios increased by €439 million to €7,619 million at December 31, 2014 from €7,180 million at December 31, 2013.
The available-for-sale financial assets consist of securities with maturities of up to 15 years. In order to limit exposure to interest rate risk, securities with maturities in excess of one year are floating-rate or are hedged through asset swaps where applicable. Short-term instruments, which have maturities of less than one year and which represent an alternative to bank deposits, can include bonds, certificates of deposits and Euro Commercial Paper (ECP). At December 31, 2014, the CEB held €2,854 million in short-term instruments (€2,234 million in bonds and €620 million in certificates of deposit). Long-term securities, with a maturity in excess of one year, must have an AA or Aa2 rating at the time of purchase. They are capped at €2 billion. For instruments maturing in less than one year, the minimum rating required is A-1 or P-1. At December 31, 2014, the total value of securities in this portfolio with a maturity of more than one year amounted to €1,953 million.
22
The portfolio of financial assets held to maturity consists of euro-denominated plain vanilla fixed-rate bonds with a maximum maturity of 30 years. Securities in this portfolio are required to have a minimum rating of AA or Aa2 when purchased. Securitization products and other securities issued by specialized vehicles, however, are required to have AAA/Aaa ratings and are capped at €500 million. As of December 31, 2014, CEB did not hold any securitization products or other securities issued by specialized vehicles. The value of the held-to-maturity portfolio must not exceed the available capital (paid-in capital and reserves) plus the Social Dividend Account and provisions for post-employment benefits. The strategic objective is to achieve a satisfactory long-term return on these funds. The portfolio is recorded in the accounts at amortized cost. Except in exceptional circumstances, the securities in this portfolio may not be exchanged or sold. At December 31, 2014, the total value of this portfolio amounted to €2,812 million.
Funding
Subject to an annual borrowing authorization granted by the Administrative Council, the CEB issues debt in the international capital markets, and the level of CEB’s debt securities in issue may fluctuate accordingly. For the year 2014, the annual borrowing authorization set by the Administrative Council for issuances with a maturity of at least one year amounted to €4 billion.
In 2014, the Bank borrowed a total of approximately €3.4 billion in eleven financing operations, including six transactions to re-open an existing line, with maturities of one year or more. This amount is similar to the volume of funding in 2013, which amounted to €3.2 billion and consisted of six financing operations, including one re-opening of an existing issuance. The 2014 funding program fulfilled three main objectives: to cover the requirements arising from CEB’s lending activity, to enable the Bank to honor its debt maturities and to enable the Bank to maintain liquidity at the level set by the Administrative Council.
For purposes of maintaining the liquidity level, the stock of projects approved is taken into account in the projected liquidity requirements. In accordance with its liquidity policy, the Bank’s liquidity ratio fixes the minimum level of liquid assets at 50% of net liquidity requirements for the next three years. These projected requirements include the funding of approved projects and the additional liquidity requirements covering the risk of default of CEB’s borrowers over three years.
To ensure the necessary funding to finance its activities, the Bank continues to combine benchmark operations on major currencies targeting a broad range of institutional investors with debt issuances in a given currency or with a more specific structure designed to meet specific investor demands.
In 2014, 44% of the funds raised by the Bank were denominated in euros, 23% in U.S. dollars, 22% in British pounds, 6% in Australian dollars and 5% in Swiss francs. These transactions enabled the Bank to diversify the markets in which its activities are financed while at the same time allowing for a broadening of its investor base. In 2013, in comparison, 64% of the funds raised by the Bank were denominated in U.S. dollars and 36% in euros.
In euros, two transactions were priced in 2014 for a total amount of €1.5 billion. A €500 million re-opening of the CEB’s €1 billion 1.125% October 2018 benchmark, originally issued in October 2013, was priced in January, inaugurating the 2014 borrowing program, and a new €1 billion benchmark with a 10-year maturity was issued in April. The euro market was the CEB’s most important market in terms of funding volumes in 2014.
In US dollars, one new bond was issued under the CEB’s shelf registration with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission: a USD 1 billion benchmark with a five-year maturity was priced in November, making the USD market the second largest in terms of funding volume in 2014.
In other currencies, one new GBP issue was priced and subsequently re-opened twice to the final combined amount of GBP 600 million, one new AUD issue was priced and subsequently re-opened three times up to the final combined amount of AUD 300 million and one new CHF issue was priced, a CHF 225 million benchmark with a nine-year maturity.
All the financing operations carried out in 2014 were hedged with swaps to eliminate both interest rate and currency risks for such financings. Through such swaps, the total amount of funds borrowed in currencies other than the euro was converted into euros.
23
The average maturity of the issuances launched in 2014 was 6.9 years, compared with 5.1 years in 2013. The table below shows funds raised in their original currencies:
Funding in 2014 (with maturities greater than one year)
Payment date |
Maturity Date |
Currency | Term | Nominal amount (in millions) |
||||||||
02/04/2014 |
10/22/2018 | EUR | 4.7 years(*) | 50 | ||||||||
02/05/2014 |
12/22/2018 | GBP | 4.9 years | 300 | ||||||||
02/13/2014 |
02/13/2024 | AUD | 10.0 years | 100 | ||||||||
03/06/2014 |
03/06/2023 | CHF | 9.0 years | 225 | ||||||||
03/17/2014 |
02/13/2024 | AUD | 9.9 years(*) | 50 | ||||||||
04/24/2014 |
04/24/2024 | EUR | 10.0 years | 1,000 | ||||||||
04/13/2014 |
02/13/2024 | AUD | 9.8 years(*) | 75 | ||||||||
05/13/2014 |
12/22/2018 | GBP | 4.6 years(*) | 150 | ||||||||
06/13/2014 |
02/13/2024 | AUD | 9.7 years(*) | 75 | ||||||||
06/12/2014 |
12/22/2018 | GBP | 4.5 years(*) | 150 | ||||||||
11/14/2014 |
11/14/2019 | USD | 5.0 years | 1,000 |
(*) | New issuance of existing bonds |
In 2014, the large majority of the issuances carried out under the borrowing program had final maturities of five years or more, compared with 95% in 2013, in order to ensure the refinancing of the Bank’s loans and avoid cash gaps in the coming years.
At December 31, 2014, the outstanding debt represented by securities (bonds and Euro Commercial Paper), excluding interest payable, amounted to €19.4 billion, up from €19.2 billion at December 31, 2013. There was no Euro Commercial Paper outstanding at December 31, 2014, compared to €0.9 billion at December 31, 2013. In 2014, as in the previous year, the Bank did not repurchase any of its long term debt. On the other hand, it made early repayments totaling €50 million, compared with €7 million in 2013. Taking these operations and the new issuances into account, the breakdown of debt by maturity is as shown in the chart below.
Financing commitments and stock of projects awaiting financing
In connection with its lending activities, the Bank enters into project financing commitments for loans to be disbursed in the near future.
Financing commitments consist of amounts which remain to be disbursed for projects with respect to which a framework loan agreement has been signed. Stock of projects awaiting financing consists of financing commitments plus any amounts in respect of projects that have been approved but for which the Bank has yet to enter into a financial commitment. For additional information on financing commitments see “Risk Management—Credit Risk— Financing Commitments”.
24
At December 31, 2014, the Bank had €2.9 billion in financing commitments to be paid out compared to approximately €3.1 billion at December 31, 2013. The stock of projects awaiting financing for Target Countries has risen significantly in recent years, from approximately €1.8 billion at year-end 2004 to approximately €3.2 billion at December 31, 2014. This increase is due to the Bank’s policy of increasing lending to Target Countries as well as the slower disbursement pace for these projects.
The table below presents information on the CEB’s stock of projects awaiting financing (including financing commitments) at year-end 2014 and 2013.
As of December 31, | ||||||||
2014 | 2013 | |||||||
(in thousands of euros) | ||||||||
Stock of projects awaiting financing |
4,618,790 | 4,648,936 | ||||||
of which |
||||||||
Financing Commitments |
2,868,150 | 3,081,855 | ||||||
For Target Countries(1) |
3,193,340 | 3,046,936 |
(1) | Information presented reflects the location of the registered office of the borrower and not that of the ultimate beneficiary, who may be based in another country. |
25
Risk management and control are of paramount importance to the creditworthiness of a financial institution. The overarching goal of risk management is to ensure the Bank’s operational resilience and long-term financial sustainability while enabling the CEB to fulfill its social mandate. Within the context of its lending and treasury activities, the CEB is exposed to four main types of risk: credit risk, market risk, liquidity risk and operational risk.
As a multilateral development bank, the CEB is not subject to its Member States’ regulatory frameworks and ratios, to the Basel Committee Recommendations or to EU Directives. Nonetheless, the CEB has decided to observe these regulations as a point of reference for its risk management, control policy and due diligence procedures. The CEB closely follows the developments under the Basel II/III framework. In order to maintain a satisfactory level of compliance with these regulations and guidelines, the CEB reviews and adjusts its procedures whenever necessary.
The Bank continued its prudent credit risk policy during the recent financial crisis. Exhaustive assessment and close monitoring together with a conservative management approach are the cornerstones of this policy.
The CEB’s risk management function is independent from the Bank’s operational activities. Several actors play a part in the Bank’s risk management, as discussed below. With rigorous supervision standards, the CEB has an integrated risk management system within the Directorate for Risk & Control (R&C). The Directorate for Risk & Control (R&C) is organized around risk management business lines and especially designed to meet higher requirements regarding global risk management. All Dedicated Departments (as defined below) perform their responsibilities independently from the Bank’s operational activities.
Risk analysis is also conducted considering the guidelines of the Bank’s Prudential Framework. The CEB’s Prudential Framework, which is organized around several ratios discussed below under “—Prudential Framework”, enables the Global Risk Management Department, the Assets and Liabilities Management Department, the Financial Risk & Control Department and the Operational Risk Department (together, the “Dedicated Departments”) to determine if the Bank’s activities and operations are conducted in accordance with risk management guidelines established by the Bank’s management. The Dedicated Departments transmit their findings to the Finance & Risk Committee, Assets and Liabilities Management (“ALM”) Committee, Funding Committee, Committee for Operational Risks and Organisation and IT Steering Committee (together, the “Decision-Making Committees”). The Dedicated Departments and Decision-Making Committees are discussed below under “—Key Risk Responsibilities—Dedicated Departments” and “—Key Risk Responsibilities—Decision-Making Committees”.
Dedicated Departments
The following Dedicated Departments monitor the CEB’s risk profile on a regular basis and report their conclusions to several committees chaired by the Governor discussed under “—Decision-Making Committees” below.
• | Global Risk Management Department (R&C). The Global Risk Management Department identifies, assesses and manages all the credit risks inherent in the CEB’s operations, as a result of both on- and off-balance sheet transactions, and assigns internal ratings to all its counterparties and transactions on the basis of internal models as discussed below under “—Credit risk—Internal rating process”. The Global Risk Management Department analyzes each operation taking into account the counterparty’s creditworthiness, outstanding transactions and country risk, and, if necessary, recommends guarantees to be obtained. The findings are part of the project approval process. In addition, the Global Risk Management Department regularly follows up on the implementation of risk policies (loans, securities, derivatives) and monitors the Bank’s position with regard to large exposures as discussed below. It also evaluates and implements risk assessment rules, methods and general risk control follow-up processes to ensure that the Bank’s risk policies are in line with international guidelines. A quarterly Risk Management Report analyzing credit, market, liquidity and operational risks and the Prudential Framework is sent to the members of the Administrative Council and the Governing Board. |
• | Financial Risk & Control Department (R&C). The Financial Risk & Control Department is responsible for the control of financial transactions, the financial valuation of swaps, the management and monitoring of collateral on swaps and loans and the liquidity position. |
• | The Operational Risk Department (R&C). The Operational Risk Department is in charge of the Bank’s operational risk mapping and is responsible for activities designed to protect the Bank from operational risks, as discussed below under “—Operational risk”. It identifies all events that could result in operating losses. It manages the business continuity plan (updates, tests with transfer to the back-up site), monitors the Bank’s archiving system and reviews the internal procedures for all activities from an operational risk perspective. |
26
• | The Financial Reporting Department (R&C). The Financial Reporting Department is responsible for monitoring the CEB’s relationship with the rating agencies, following up on their methodologies, benchmarking with peer IFIs, and monitoring the Bank’s capital (capital increases, adhesions, etc.). |
• | Assets and Liabilities Management (ALM) Department (FIN). Within the Finance Directorate (FIN), the ALM Department monitors liquidity risk and market risk (the latter consisting of interest rate risk and currency risk). The ALM Department analyses various scenarios of interest rate variations and their impact on the Bank’s profitability, using a number of stress tests as discussed below under “—Market Risk—Interest rate risks” and “—Market Risk—Currency risks”. It presents the projected liquidity situation based on various borrower default assumptions (see “—Liquidity Risk”). Where applicable, the ALM Department reports actual or foreseeable cases of limits being exceeded and makes recommendations to the ALM Committee so as to reduce the identified risks. The ALM Department issues a quarterly ALM Report on interest rate risk, foreign exchange risk and liquidity risk incurred by the Bank. This report analyzes, among other things, the consequences of a fluctuation in the interest rates and the euro/U.S. dollar exchange rate on the Bank’s results. It also produces an analysis of the projected liquidity situation. At any time, the Department may call for an extraordinary meeting of the ALM Committee in case of an exceptional situation. |
In addition, the CEB’s activities are monitored by the Office of the Chief Compliance Officer and Internal Audit.
• | Office of the Chief Compliance Officer (OCCO). OCCO is responsible for the creation, review and maintenance of policies, guidelines and procedures which aim to mitigate CEB’s exposure to financial or reputational risks arising from legal, administrative or regulatory sanctions, as well as to achieve the highest standards of, integrity, ethics, good governance and transparency. OCCO’s prime responsibility is to safeguard the Bank from money-laundering, financing of terrorism, fraud, corruption or from implication in other matters that might damage the CEB’s reputation, not only with regard to the projects financed by the CEB, but also to its purchases of goods and services. Furthermore, the compliance function also has a priority focus on the adherence to CEB’s Codes of Conducts, preserving the highest standards of integrity and ethics, protecting CEB from conflicts of interest and handling the treatment of confidential information, in each case aligned to international best practices. The Chief Compliance Officer reports directly to the Governor, while enjoying functional independence. Within the Compliance Department, the Chief Information Security Officer (the “CISO”) is responsible for developing and implementing global security policies, standards, guidelines and procedures. The CISO also defines and plans independent business and operations survey programs and tools to ensure that effective IT system security controls are activated and executed. The CISO periodically updates the Bank’s IT system security policies and guidelines. The CISO also systematically performs recurring and targeted system security controls and monitors user profile authorizations as far as information systems, applications, telecommunications and other technical support systems are concerned. |
• | Internal Audit. In the CEB’s control framework the Internal Audit is a self-contained entity. The Head of Internal Audit reports directly to the Governor. Internal Audit carries out periodic independent reviews of the CEB’s activities to ensure systematic compliance with policies and operating procedures. The objective of Internal Audit is to provide the CEB’s Governor, Vice-Governors and controlling organs with an objective assurance of effective and controlled business and operational activities. Independent from any direct management, business or operational functions, Internal Audit examines the CEB’s activities and transactions and evaluates their conformity with existing policies, procedures and best practices as well as their associated risks. It also verifies that internal controls are efficiently and consistently applied and makes recommendations for potential improvements. |
Decision-Making Committees
The following Decision-Making Committees, set up by the Governor, are responsible for defining and overseeing risk management policies in their specified areas. The Governor (or in his absence, one of the Vice-Governors) chairs all of these committees.
• | The Finance & Risk Committee is the cornerstone of the Bank’s credit risk management framework. Risk management policies are established to identify and analyze the risks faced by the Bank, to set the appropriate risk limits and controls and to monitor the respect of those limits. It meets weekly and takes decisions based on the Global Risk Management Department’s assessments and recommendations. It also reviews all aspects of the Bank’s financial activity (cash management, debt, trends in the financial markets, liquidity) on a weekly basis. |
• | The ALM Committee decides on the assets and liabilities management strategy. It takes the necessary decisions with regard to financial risks on the basis of the Bank’s quarterly ALM report and in accordance with the financial policies approved by the Administrative Council. |
27
• | The Funding Committee addresses the funding strategy and the pricing policy on at least a quarterly basis. It also decides on the strategy relating to debt issuance (amounts, currencies, conditions and schedule) on the basis of the Bank’s estimated liquidity requirements and in conformity with the annual levels of debt authorized by the Administrative Council following a proposal by the Governor. |
• | The Committee for Operational Risks and Organization (“CORO”) meets semi-annually to set acceptable levels for the operational risks run by the CEB and ensures that Directors take the necessary steps to monitor and control these risks within their respective Directorates. |
• | The IT Steering Committee covers all issues related to information systems and IT infrastructure to ensure business continuity and meets twice a year. |
It should also be noted that the CEB’s Boards (Administrative Council and Governing Board) have overall responsibility and supervision for approving the Risk Management Framework.
Although the CEB follows the recommendations of the Basel Committee under the Basel II framework, the Prudential Framework has traditionally been organized around the Bank’s own ratios. Following the CEB’s review of the Prudential Framework in light of developments related to the Basel II framework, including Basel III, as well as the ratios used by other multilateral development banks, a new Prudential Framework was approved by the Administrative Council on November 14, 2013 and came into force on January 1, 2014. Although it is not mandatory for a multilateral development bank to do so, under this revised Prudential Framework the Bank follows the best practices established by the Basel Committee, thus enabling it to counter new risks and ensure its financial sustainability.
The CEB’s revised Prudential Framework is organized around three main pillars: capital adequacy, liquidity and leverage, through six prudential indicators (ratios). Two capital ratios are used: a “capital adequacy ratio” based on the Basel II/III definition and a “gearing ratio” comparing outstanding loans to own funds in order to ensure comparability with other multilateral development banks. Regarding liquidity, in addition to a liquidity ratio, a short-term liquidity ratio is used, enabling the Bank to have a broader scope and timeframe for assessment of its liquidity position. As for leverage, two ratios respectively assess the level of debt and the level of treasury assets compared to prudential equity: a treasury assets ratio and an indebtedness ratio. All of these ratios are described below.
The prudential ratios function as “warning” indicators and are regularly reported to the Governing Board and Administrative Council. These ratios are calculated on a monthly basis (or more frequently if requested or otherwise required) by the Global Risk Management Department, the Financial Risk & Control Department and the Operational Risk Department and any variation from one period to another is analyzed by the Dedicated Departments and reported to the Decision-Making Committees. If one or several ratios deteriorate, the Dedicated Departments analyze the reasons and identify underlying factors. The result of such analysis is presented to the Decision-Making Committees, which may propose remedial action to the Bank’s General Management Committee.
Capital Adequacy Ratio Basel II/III
This ratio is a measure of the CEB’s prudential equity expressed as a percentage of its total risk weighted assets (nominal value of assets times a risk-weighted factor based on external indicators of credit, market and operational risk), and is designed to allow the CEB to monitor excessive risk build-up in its activities. CEB defines prudential equity as paid-in capital, reserves and net profit.
The minimum level of prudential equity is fixed at 10.5% of the CEB’s risk-weighted assets. The capital adequacy ratio improved during the year from 22.6% estimated at December 31, 2013 to 25.5% at December 31, 2014, since the total risk-weighted assets decreased, while the CEB’s prudential equity continued to increase.
Gearing Ratio
This ratio measures the volume (as opposed to the credit risk) of loans outstanding compared to own funds, which is defined for the purposes of this ratio as subscribed capital, reserves and net profit. This ratio is intended to provide a clearer picture of the CEB’s volume of loans outstanding in comparison with other multilateral development banks.
The ratio’s limit is fixed at 2.5 (two and a half times the CEB’s own funds), i.e., €18.8 billion at December 31, 2014. The ratio improved during the year from 1.72 estimated at December 31, 2013 to 1.67 at December 31, 2014 due to the strengthening of CEB’s own funds, while loans outstanding decreased slightly.
28
Liquidity Ratio
This ratio is designed to measure the Bank’s capacity to meet its net liquidity requirements. These requirements take into account the total stock of projects awaiting financing and net cash flow for a three-year period. The Bank’s liquid assets are deposits and financial assets available for sale with a residual maturity of less than 18 months.
As of December 31, 2014, the liquidity ratio, which fixes the minimum level of liquid assets at 50% of net liquidity requirements for the next three years, stood at 164.3% compared to 117.4% estimated as of December 31, 2013. This increase stems from a substantial decrease in net liquidity requirements compared with a slight decline in liquid assets.
Short-Term Liquidity Ratio
This ratio, calculated for various time periods, evaluates the CEB’s capacity to handle its net liquidity requirements over an extended market disruption or economic downturn. It compares potential sources of cash (drawdown of unrestricted cash and short-term inter-bank placements, repayment or sale of unencumbered high-quality liquid securities and repayment of loans) to potential uses of liquidity (reimbursement of issues, disbursements of financing commitments and requirements to give back cash received as collateral on derivatives). The minimum level of potential sources of cash is fixed at 100% of CEB’s potential uses of cash for each timeframe.
This analysis of the potential “liquidity gap” between sources and uses of cash is done on a forward-looking basis over different periods: one, three, six, and twelve months. This liquidity analysis is then tested for adverse market and economic conditions by applying risk haircuts to assets depending on their asset class, rating and maturity.
As of December 31, 2014, the short-term liquidity ratio stood at: 456% for a 1-month period (434% estimated as of December 31, 2013), 246% for a 3-month period (286% estimated as of December 31, 2013), 176% for a 6-month period (191% estimated as of December 31, 2013) and 122% for the 1-year period (145% estimated as of December 31, 2013).
Treasury Assets Ratio
This ratio compares total financial assets after swap to prudential equity, as defined above. Total financial assets are composed of nostro accounts, bank deposits, repos and both securities portfolios (held-to-maturity and available-for-sale). Amounts received as collateral under CSA contracts are not taken into account.
The ratio’s limit is fixed at 6 (six times the CEB’s prudential equity), i.e., €15.8 billion at December 31, 2014. The ratio stood at 3.35 as of December 31, 2014, down from 3.90 estimated as of December 31, 2013, due to the decrease in financial assets while the CEB’s prudential equity continued to increase.
Indebtedness Ratio
This ratio compares total debt outstanding after swap to prudential equity, as defined above. Total debt outstanding includes: debt evidenced by a security after swap, commercial paper, bank advances and term deposit accounts without collateral.
The ratio’s limit is fixed at 12 (twelve times the CEB’s prudential equity), i.e., €31.7 billion at December 31, 2014. The ratio stood at 6.95 as of December 31, 2014, down from 7.77 estimated as of December 31, 2013, due to the decrease of the debt outstanding while the CEB’s prudential equity continued to increase.
Internal and External Reporting on Risk Management
A report outlining in detail the Bank’s exposure to credit risk and containing information on capital markets and liquidity management is sent to the members of the Finance & Risk Committee on a weekly basis. However, within the present financial context, additional information is provided whenever an event or decision occurs that raises concern about the prudential ratios or the quality of the CEB’s counterparties, which are kept under constant surveillance.
The quarterly Risk Management Report presented to members of both the Administrative Council and the Governing Board aims to inform the shareholders on developments in the CEB’s exposure to the principal types of risks, i.e., credit, market, liquidity and operational risks, and the situation regarding the prudential framework.
In terms of external reporting on risk management, the Bank provides extensive information to the rating agencies as a support for their annual assessment.
Finally, CEB’s annual Report of the Governor gives an objective view of the risk management processes and practices in place at the Bank and its year-end financial statements disclose data on its risk exposure.
29
Overview of credit risk evaluation process
Credit risk is defined as the risk of financial loss that may occur if a counterparty fails to meet its contractual obligations. The Global Risk Management Department identifies, assesses and manages all credit risks arising from lending and treasury activities.
With respect to both types of activities, the Global Risk Management Department assesses all of the CEB’s counterparties for creditworthiness, except counterparties to treasury activity conducted in accordance with a financial investment policy approved by the Administrative Council. The Global Risk Management Department establishes internal ratings as discussed below, assigns a maximum exposure limit (in nominal amounts) and submits them to the Finance & Risk Committee which approves, modifies or rejects the limits. These assessments, based on due diligence carried out on-site or off-site, allow CEB’s risk representatives to deepen their knowledge on how the CEB’s counterparties manage their business and risks. A detailed questionnaire to be completed by the counterparties is systematically forwarded prior to each on-site evaluation and provides the basis for discussion during the meetings. As for lending activity, the findings are part of the loan approval process. For all potential projects, the Global Risk Management Department assesses the transaction on the basis of the counterparty’s creditworthiness and the CEB’s current exposure to such counterparty as well as the country risk and, if necessary, recommends credit enhancement measures (e.g. guarantees). After approval by the Finance & Risk Committee, the project is submitted to the Administrative Council.
Internal rating process
In line with best banking practices, the Global Risk Management Department assigns an internal rating to all counterparties based upon on-site or off-site analyses. The internal rating scale goes from 1 to 10, 10 being the best grade. Each internal grade has its equivalent on the scales of international rating agencies. Two types of internal ratings are assigned: counterparty ratings and transaction ratings, the latter being given for project financing operations only. The internal counterparty rating is based upon qualitative and quantitative criteria. The model is largely based on due diligence conducted by the Global Risk Management Department and on the ratings of the international rating agencies, when available. Scoring models, developed in-house, apply various ratios according to the type of counterparty. Specific internal rating grids are used when a counterparty is not rated by an international agency. A transaction rating is based on the internal counterparty rating and takes into account, if need be, all credit enhancement applied to the transaction: collateral, guarantee, assignment of receivables and other structures that reduce the final risk.
The Bank has set up a methodology to validate the internal rating system based upon the analysis of any gaps between its internal rating and that of international rating agencies. Any difference beyond two notches will bring about an in-depth review of the internal rating.
Overview of credit risk exposure
As previously disclosed, the CEB’s credit rating has been negatively affected by the financial crisis in Europe and the related deterioration in the credit ratings of certain CEB member states and a number of the CEB’s treasury and lending counterparties. The downgrade of the CEB’s credit rating has not had any material impact on its financial results. However, despite recent improvement in the credit profile of certain member states, marked deterioration in the creditworthiness of the CEB’s Member States or counterparties could harm the CEB’s credit rating as well as potentially affect its future results.
The nominal value of credit risk exposure on all of the Bank’s transactions excluding accrued interest (loans, financing commitments, deposits, securities and derivatives) at December 31, 2014 and 2013 is shown in the table below. With respect to the loan portfolio, credit enhancements are taken into account. In line with the Basel II framework, an add-on for credit risk exposure on the derivative portfolio is calculated. To obtain the potential future credit exposure on the derivatives portfolio (swap add-on), the swap notional amounts are multiplied by a percentage based on residual maturity and type of contract (according to EU Directives).
30
CEB CREDIT RISK EXPOSURE (1)
in million euros | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2014 | 2013 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
AAA/AA | A/BBB | BIG(2) | No risk(3) | Total | AAA/AA | A/BBB | BIG(2) | No risk(3) | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Loans |
1,929 | 7,936 | 2,701 | 1.4 | 12,568 | 1,904 | 7,309 | 3,368 | 1.1 | 12,582 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Financing commitments |
339 | 1,681 | 847 | 0.7 | 2,868 | 355 | 1,906 | 820 | 1.2 | 3,082 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Deposits |
1,014 | 1,489 | 2,503 | 1,750 | 1,342 | 3,093 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Securities |
4,427 | 2,643 | 200 | 7,269 | 4,147 | 2,566 | 200 | 6,913 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Swap - add on |
251 | 318 | 569 | 186 | 284 | 471 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Forex |
94 | 94 | 68 | 68 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Swap coll - NPV not covered |
51 | 13 | 64 | 6 | 6 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Total |
8,011 | 14,174 | 3,748 | 2.1 | 25,935 | 8,348 | 13,476 | 4,388 | 2.3 | 26,214 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) | Ratings presented are those as recommended by the Basel Committee (second best rating), and, when not rated by international rating agencies, an internal rating. |
(2) | Below investment grade. |
(3) | Exposure fully provisioned or guaranteed by the Social Dividend Account (CEB). |
Concentration – large exposure
LARGE EXPOSURE BY COUNTERPARTY (OR GROUP OF CONNECTED COUNTERPARTIES)
in million euros | ||||||||||||
TREASURY(1) | LENDING(2) | |||||||||||
CREDIT AGRICOLE S.A. (FR /A) |
62 | 629 | 14% | |||||||||
SOCIETE GENERALE (FR /A) |
248 | 396 | 13% | |||||||||
BPCE (FR /A) |
207 | 392 | 12% | |||||||||
BNP PARIBAS (FR /A+) |
549 | 7 | 11% | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
subtotal |
1,065 | 1,424 | 50% | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
TURKEY |
0 | 1,364 | 27% | |||||||||
ROMANIA |
0 | 1,086 | 22% | |||||||||
HUNGARY |
0 | 1,021 | 20% | |||||||||
SPAIN |
105 | 782 | 18% | |||||||||
CYPRUS |
0 | 761 | 15% | |||||||||
LAND NORDRHEIN-WESTFALEN |
432 | 210 | 13% | |||||||||
FRANCE |
633 | 0 | 13% | |||||||||
POLAND |
0 | 597 | 12% | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
subtotal |
1,171 | 5,822 | 140% | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
TOTAL |
2,236 | 7,246 | 190% | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) | Treasury: securities, deposits including nostro accounts and derivatives. |
(2) | Lending: loans, financing commitments. |
Large exposure is the overall exposure (loans, financing commitments, securities, deposits and derivatives) to a counterparty or group of connected counterparties other than OECD sovereigns (as a multilateral development bank, the CEB does not take into account sovereign risks of OECD member countries from this analysis) exceeding 10% of sound prudential equity. The CEB defines sound prudential equity as paid-in capital, reserves, net profit, as well as uncalled capital of triple-A or double-A rated Member States (second best rating by Moody’s, Standard & Poor’s and Fitch Ratings). However, for information purposes, all sovereign exposures exceeding 10% of sound prudential equity are presented in the table above.
In accordance with the Basel Committee Recommendations and EU Directives, the Bank ensures that no exposure to a counterparty or group of connected counterparties exceeds the limit of 25% of sound prudential equity as defined above, and that the total of large exposures does not exceed 800% of sound prudential equity.
31
As of December 31, 2014, the Bank had four large exposures ranging between 11% and 14% of sound prudential equity to financial groups in France rated A as of such date. As of December 31, 2013, the Bank had six large exposures estimated between 11% and 17% of sound prudential equity to financial groups in France, the Netherlands and Australia, 36% of which were rated AA and 64% rated A as of such date. As of December 31, 2014, the total large exposure reached €2.5 billion, or 50%, of the CEB’s sound prudential equity compared to €3.9 billion, or 80%, of sound prudential equity estimated as of December 31, 2013, versus a limit of 800%.
CEB’s sovereign exposure for loans and securities portfolios
The table below presents information on the CEB’s exposure to sovereigns for loans and securities portfolios at year-end 2014 and 2013. See “—Total lending and treasury exposure in the Eurozone” below for a discussion of the CEB’s total exposure in Eurozone countries.
CEB’S EXPOSURE TO SOVEREIGNS(1) FOR LOANS AND SECURITIES PORTFOLIOS
2014 | 2013 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Loans | Securities | Total | Loans | Securities | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||
EU countries (a) |
8,044 | 3,871 | 11,916 | 7,720 | 3,038 | 10,758 | ||||||||||||||||||||
France |
352 | 1,633 | 1,985 | France |
404 | 1,614 | 2,019 | |||||||||||||||||||
Germany |
641 | 849 | 1,490 | Germany |
642 | 244 | 885 | |||||||||||||||||||
Spain |
1,115 | 105 | 1,221 | Belgium |
757 | 20 | 777 | |||||||||||||||||||
Belgium |
905 | 20 | 925 | Spain |
569 | 113 | 683 | |||||||||||||||||||
Cyprus |
619 | 619 | Cyprus |
621 | 621 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Portugal |
170 | 200 | 370 | Portugal |
179 | 200 | 379 | |||||||||||||||||||
Italy |
92 | 160 | 252 | Italy |
141 | 160 | 301 | |||||||||||||||||||
Finland |
154 | 76 | 229 | Finland |
121 | 50 | 171 | |||||||||||||||||||
Ireland |
118 | 10 | 128 | Ireland |
104 | 10 | 114 | |||||||||||||||||||
Austria(2) |
6 | 89 | 95 | Austria |
83 | 83 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Slovak Republic |
48 | 48 | Malta |
48 | 48 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Luxembourg |
42 | 42 | Luxembourg |
42 | 42 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Malta |
38 | 38 | Slovak Republic |
32 | 32 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Latvia |
31 | 31 | Estonia |
26 | 26 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Estonia |
23 | 23 | Greece |
23 | 23 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Slovenia |
18 | 18 | Slovenia |
19 | 19 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Sub-total Eurozone |
4,329 | 3,184 | 7,513 | 3,686 | 2,536 | 6,222 | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Poland |
1,078 | 1,078 | Hungary |
1,222 | 1,222 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Hungary |
984 | 984 | Poland |
1,048 | 1,048 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Romania |
862 | 862 | Romania |
896 | 896 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Supranational institutions(3) |
1.8 | 688 | 690 | Supranational institutions |
0 | 502 | 502 | |||||||||||||||||||
Croatia |
281 | 281 | Croatia |
286 | 286 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Denmark |
187 | 187 | Denmark |
205 | 205 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Lithuania |
137 | 137 | Lithuania |
140 | 140 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Sweden |
108 | 108 | Sweden |
131 | 131 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Czech Republic |
39 | 39 | Bulgaria |
38 | 38 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Bulgaria |
37 | 37 | Sweden |
36 | 36 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Latvia |
32 | 32 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Sub-total Others |
3,715 | 688 | 4,403 | Sub-total Others |
4,034 | 502 | 4,536 | |||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Non EU countries (b) |
1,393 | 1,393 | 1,271 | 1,271 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Turkey |
1,074 | 1,074 | Turkey |
984 | 984 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Albania |
107 | 107 | Albania |
109 | 109 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Serbia |
77 | 77 | Serbia |
59 | 59 | |||||||||||||||||||||
“the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia” |
53 | 53 | “the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia” |
49 | 49 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Bosnia and Herzegovina |
32 | 32 | Iceland |
22 | 22 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Moldova (Republic of) |
23 | 23 | Moldova (Republic of) |
20 | 20 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Iceland |
17 | 17 | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
18 | 18 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Montenegro |
9 | 9 | Montenegro |
9 | 9 | |||||||||||||||||||||
San Marino |
0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Total (a)+(b) |
9,437 | 3,871 | 13,308 | 8,991 | 3,038 | 12,029 | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) | Sovereigns include: states, public administrations, state financial institutions, special financial institutions. |
(2) | Non CEB Member State: guarantee and collateral received on loans. |
(3) | Organizations composed of several nations, operating beyond the authority of one national government. |
32
Total lending and treasury exposure in the Eurozone
As a result of increased economic stability in Europe, the risk quality improved for both lending and treasury counterparties in 2014. The Bank’s overall credit risk exposure on all its transactions (loans, financing commitments, securities, deposits and derivatives) in the Eurozone represented 58% of its total exposure as of December 31, 2014, compared to 57.4% as of December 31, 2013. The table below presents the CEB’s lending exposure (i.e., loans and financing commitments) and treasury exposure (i.e., securities, deposits and derivatives) in Eurozone countries for 2014.
EXPOSURE IN THE EUROZONE
in million euros | ||||||||||||
TREASURY | LENDING | TOTAL | ||||||||||
AUSTRIA(2) |
89 | 455 | 544 | |||||||||
BELGIUM |
20 | 1,077 | 1,097 | |||||||||
CYPRUS(1) |
0 | 761 | 761 | |||||||||
GERMANY |
1,436 | 838 | 2,274 | |||||||||
ESTONIA |
0 | 23 | 23 | |||||||||
SPAIN(1) |
109 | 1,721 | 1,831 | |||||||||
FINLAND |
76 | 389 | 465 | |||||||||
FRANCE |
3,542 | 1,644 | 5,186 | |||||||||
IRELAND |
10 | 139 | 149 | |||||||||
ITALY |
160 | 465 | 625 | |||||||||
LUXEMBOURG |
42 | 0 | 42 | |||||||||
LATVIA |
83 | 83 | ||||||||||
MALTA |
0 | 38 | 38 | |||||||||
NETHERLANDS |
944 | 0 | 944 | |||||||||
PORTUGAL(1) |
200 | 393 | 593 | |||||||||
SLOVENIA(1) |
0 | 136 | 136 | |||||||||
SLOVAK REPUBLIC |
0 | 254 | 254 | |||||||||
6,628 | 8,416 | 15,043 |
(1) | Below investment grade counterparties |
(2) | Non CEB Member State: guarantees and collateral received on loans |
Loan portfolio
At year-end 2014, loans outstanding stood at €12.6 billion, stable compared to year-end 2013. The portfolio breakdown by type of counterparty shows that 48.4% of loans outstanding at year-end 2014 were extended to sovereigns (compared to 46.0% at year-end 2013), 26.7% to sub-sovereign administrations and financial institutions (compared to 25.4% at year-end 2013), 23.2% to other financial institutions (compared to 26.6% at year-end 2013) and 1.7% to other counterparties (compared to 1.9% at year-end 2013).
Loans outstanding rated “investment grade” represented 78.5% of the total portfolio at year-end 2014 (compared to 73.2% at year-end 2013). This improvement in credit quality mirrors the relative economic stability over the course of 2014 and the corresponding improvements in the ratings of certain Member States with a positive impact on 17% of the loan portfolio, which was partially offset by the downgrade of some counterparties’ rating concerning 9% of the portfolio.
Loans outstanding to counterparties not rated by international rating agencies represented 4.1% of the overall loan portfolio at year-end 2014 (3.8% at year-end 2013) and the internal rating assigned to these counterparties was spread between 3 and 9.5, stable compared 2013. Please see Note B to the Bank’s audited financial statements for a further discussion of the CEB’s internal rating system.
At year-end 2014, the amount of credit enhancements in the loan portfolio totaled €5.4 billion (compared to €4.7 billion as of December 31, 2013); these enhancements were comprised of guarantees for €4.8 billion (compared to €4.2 billion at year-end 2013) and of €0.6 billion in collateral (compared to €0.5 billion at year-end 2013). These credit risk mitigation techniques changed the distribution by type of counterparty, thus increasing the “sovereign portfolio” by 13.2%.
In 2014 and 2013, the CEB did not record any new non-performing loans.
33
As is the case for other multilateral development banks, the Bank’s policy is not to reschedule interest or capital payments on its loans and not to participate in debt rescheduling agreements.
34
The following tables display, respectively, the breakdown of the loan portfolio by rating and by type of counterparty, and the share of the loans outstanding with the ten main counterparties, each for the two years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013:
LOAN PORTFOLIO BY RATING AND BY TYPE OF COUNTERPARTIES(1)
2014 | 2013 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
AAA/AA | A/BBB | BIG(2) | No risk(3) | Total | AAA/AA | A/BBB | BIG(2) | No risk(3) | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sovereign |
250 | 3,472 | 2,355 | 6,077 | 257 | 2,936 | 2,595 | 5,789 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sub-sovereign administration and financial institutions (state-owned, region-owned, etc.) |
1,552 | 1,779 | 27 | 3,358 | 1,490 | 1,681 | 32 | 3,202 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
IFI, International organizations |
1.0 | 0.8 | 1.8 | 0.3 | 0.3 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other financial institutions |
125 | 2,633 | 154 | 0.6 | 2,913 | 157 | 2,619 | 574 | 0.8 | 3,351 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Non financial institutions |
52 | 165 | 217 | 72 | 167 | 239 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Total |
1,929 | 7,936 | 2,701 | 1.4 | 12,568 | 1,904 | 7,309 | 3,368 | 1.1 | 12,582 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) | Ratings presented are those as recommended by the Basel Committee (second best rating), and, when not rated by international rating agencies, an internal rating. |
(2) | Below investment grade. |
(3) | Exposure fully provisioned or guaranteed by the Social Dividend Account (CEB). |
LOANS OUTSTANDING WITH TEN MAIN COUNTERPARTIES(1)
2014 | 2013 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
AAA/AA | A/BBB | BIG(2) | No risk(3) | Total | % | AAA/AA | A/BBB | BIG(2) | No risk(3) | Total | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1. | Turkey | 1,074 | 1,074 | 9 | % | Hungary | 1,222 | 1,222 | 10 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2. | Hungary | 984 | 984 | 8 | % | Turkey | 984 | 984 | 8 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3. | Romania | 862 | 862 | 7 | % | Romania | 896 | 896 | 7 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
4. | Spain | 642 | 642 | 5 | % | Cyprus | 621 | 621 | 5 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
5. | Cyprus | 619 | 619 | 5 | % | Crédit Agricole | 476 | 476 | 4 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6. | Région Wallonne | 495 | 495 | 4 | % | Poland | 461 | 461 | 4 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
7. | Crédit Agricole | 493 | 493 | 4 | % | Région Wallonne | 440 | 440 | 3 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
8. | Poland | 463 | 463 | 4 | % | PKO Bank | 311 | 311 | 2 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
9. | PKO Bank | 313 | 313 | 2 | % | CaixaBank | 308 | 308 | 2 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
10. | CaixaBank | 306 | 306 | 2 | % | UniCredit | 298 | 298 | 2 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sub-total | 4,648 | 1,603 | 6,251 | 50 | % | Sub-total | 4,175 | 1,843 | 6,017 | 48 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Others | 1,929 | 3,288 | 1,098 | 1.4 | 6,317 | 50 | % | Others | 1,904 | 3,134 | 1,526 | 1.1 | 6,564 | 52 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total | 1,929 | 7,936 | 2,701 | 1.4 | 12,568 | 100 | % | Total | 1,904 | 7,309 | 3,368 | 1.1 | 12,582 | 100 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) | Ratings presented are those as recommended by the Basel Committee (second best rating), and, when not rated by international rating agencies, an internal rating. |
(2) | Below investment grade. |
(3) | Exposure fully provisioned or guaranteed by the Social Dividend Account (CEB). |
35
Financing Commitments
As discussed above under “Financial Review—Balance Sheet—Financing commitments and stock of projects awaiting financing”, financing commitments are approved projects still awaiting financing and for which a framework loan agreement has been signed. During 2014, financing commitments decreased slightly from €3.1 billion at year-end 2013 to €2.9 billion at year-end 2014. At year-end 2014, financing commitments rated “investment grade” represented 70.5% of the total portfolio, compared to 73.4% at year-end 2013. The following table highlights the share of financing commitments belonging to the Eurozone and displays the breakdown by rating for the two years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013.
EXPOSURE ON FINANCING COMMITMENTS(1)
2014 | 2013 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
AAA/AA | A/BBB | BIG(2) | No risk(3) | Total | AAA/AA | A/BBB | BIG(2) | No risk(3) | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Eurozone countries |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
France |
50 | 314 | 364 | 325 | 325 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Slovak Republic |
193 | 193 | 23 | 23 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Spain |
190 | 190 | 305 | 305 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Germany |
179 | 6 | 185 | 205 | 2 | 207 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Portugal |
170 | 170 | 170 | 170 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Austria(4) |
148 | 148 | 188 | 188 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cyprus |
142 | 142 | 177 | 177 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Finland |
60 | 50 | 110 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Belgium |
50 | 50 | 150 | 143 | 293 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ireland |
21 | 21 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Slovenia |
20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Italy |
3 | 3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Sub-total |
339 | 945 | 312 | 1,596 | 355 | 1,005 | 347 | 1,707 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Others |
737 | 535 | 0.7 | 1,273 | 902 | 473 | 1.2 | 1,375 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Total |
339 | 1,681 | 847 | 0.7 | 2,868 | 355 | 1,906 | 820 | 1.2 | 3,082 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) | Ratings presented are those as recommended by the Basel Committee (second best rating), and, when not rated by international rating agencies, an internal rating. |
(2) | Below investment grade. |
(3) | Exposure fully provisioned or guaranteed by the Social Dividend Account (CEB). |
(4) | Non Member State: guarantee to be received. |
36
Securities portfolios
The Bank manages two securities portfolios: a portfolio of financial assets held to maturity and a portfolio of available-for-sale financial assets (see “Financial Review—Balance Sheet—Securities Portfolio”). Securities in both portfolios are essentially denominated in euros: 96.9% at year-end 2014 compared to 96.3% at year-end 2013. The following table details the share of both securities portfolios belonging to the Eurozone and displays the breakdown by rating of each of these portfolios for the two years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013.
EXPOSURE ON SECURITIES PORTFOLIOS (1)
2014 | 2013 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
AAA/AA | A/BBB | BIG(2) | Total | AAA/AA | A/BBB | BIG(2) | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Financial assets held to maturity |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
France |
1,327 | 1,327 | 1,373 | 1,373 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Portugal |
200 | 200 | 200 | 200 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Netherlands |
182 | 182 | 182 | 182 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Germany |
175 | 175 | 134 | 134 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Italy |
160 | 160 | 160 | 160 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Finland |
76 | 76 | 50 | 50 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Austria |
53 | 53 | 47 | 47 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Luxembourg |
42 | 42 | 42 | 42 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Spain |
40 | 40 | 50 | 50 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ireland |
10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Belgium |
10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other countries |
378 | 378 | 230 | 230 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Sub-total |
2,242 | 210 | 200 | 2,652 | 2,068 | 220 | 200 | 2,488 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Financial assets available for sale |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
France |
446 | 693 | 1,139 | 482 | 698 | 1,180 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Germany |
764 | 240 | 1,004 | 140 | 250 | 390 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Netherlands |
532 | 532 | 908 | 908 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Spain |
65 | 65 | 63 | 63 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Austria |
36 | 36 | 35 | 35 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Belgium |
10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other countries |
398 | 1,435 | 1,833 | 503 | 1,335 | 1,838 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Sub-total |
2,185 | 2,433 | 4,617 | 2,079 | 2,346 | 4,425 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Total |
4,427 | 2,643 | 200 | 7,269 | 4,147 | 2,566 | 200 | 6,913 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) | Ratings presented are those as recommended by the Basel Committee (second best rating), and, when not rated by international rating agencies, an internal rating. |
(2) | Below investment grade. |
Derivatives
The Bank uses derivatives solely as an end user for hedging purposes, namely to hedge the interest rate and currency risks on its issues, loans and treasury operations in accordance with the policy adopted by the Administrative Council. Before entering into a derivative transaction, credit clearance of the counterparty by the Finance & Risk Committee is required and a framework agreement (usually an ISDA master agreement and a credit support annex) must be signed. Swap transactions are valued at their net present value and the positions per counterparty are monitored daily so that additional collateral is requested if necessary.
At year-end 2014, the breakdown of derivatives by type of hedge was 75.9% for issues (compared to 76.4% at year-end 2013), 17.9% for loans (compared to 18.5% at year-end 2013) and 6.2% for securities (compared to 5.1% at year-end 2013).
All outstanding derivatives were collateralized at year-end 2014, unchanged compared to year-end 2013. The Bank can receive cash deposits, AAA/AA rated securities (US, German, UK, French or Dutch government bonds) and/or, on a case-by-case basis, other fixed rate fixed maturity securities upon approval by the CEB as collateral for derivatives.
37
MATURITY OF SWAP INSTRUMENTS
The breakdown of the nominal value of swaps by instrument and by maturity is shown in the table below.
In million euros | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2014 | 2013 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
less than 1 year |
1 to 5 years |
5 to 10 years |
10 years or more |
Total | less than 1 year |
1 to 5 years |
5 to 10 years |
10 years or more |
Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total (a) |
5,334 | 12,072 | 5,598 | 2,537 | 25,540 | 4,043 | 13,029 | 4,291 | 2,434 | 23,797 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Currency-rate swaps |
4,783 | 9,219 | 1,188 | 553 | 15,743 | 3,901 | 10,947 | 903 | 595 | 16,346 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest-rate swaps |
550 | 2,853 | 4,410 | 1,983 | 9,797 | 143 | 2,082 | 3,388 | 1,839 | 7,451 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
thereof: collateralized (b) |
5,334 | 12,072 | 5,598 | 2,537 | 25,540 | 4,043 | 13,029 | 4,291 | 2,434 | 23,797 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(b)/(a) |
100 | % | 100 | % | 100 | % | 100 | % | 100 | % | 100 | % | 100 | % | 100 | % |
Market risk is defined as a risk of loss incurred as a result of unfavorable changes in interest or currency exchange rates. Within the ambit of its ordinary operations (issuing, loans and securities operations), the Bank is exposed to interest rate and currency risks. The CEB attempts to hedge itself against these risks in order to reduce interest rate risks and currency risks to a minimum.
As discussed further above under “—Key Risk Responsibilities—Dedicated Departments”, interest rate risk and currency risk are measured and reviewed by the ALM Department under the authority of the Chief Financial Officer. If necessary, the ALM Department informs the Chief Financial Officer about any actual or projected limit overrun, records it in the ALM report and proposes actions to the ALM Committee with a view to restraining the nature and amount of identified risks.
Interest rate risks
The Bank manages its overall balance at variable rates (except for its held-to-maturity assets portfolio), either directly or through hedging swaps. Macro-hedging can also be considered if necessary. Since the Bank performs no trading operations, the Basel Committee requirements for capital allocation would not apply (even if the Bank were subject to those requirements). As a result of the Bank’s hedging strategy, the interest rate risk in the Bank’s balance sheet is limited to the amount of the held-to-maturity financial assets portfolio. This portfolio is equivalent in volume to the sum of usable equity (as defined above under “Financial Review—Balance Sheet—Securities Portfolio”), the cash balance of the Social Dividend Account and provisions for post-employment social commitments.
Currency risks
The CEB’s strategy with respect to currency risk is not to take any position and to finance assets and liabilities in a single currency. The residual risk arising from gains and losses in currencies other than the euro is systematically monitored and hedged on a monthly basis. The net open position is limited to the equivalent of €1 million per currency. As of December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, the net open position was almost zero.
The projected liquidity position is subject to daily monitoring. Projections are made on future cash flows, taking into account existing commitments (such as loans, issuing and securities). These projections also include the level of liquidity which would result if any early repayment options of counterparties were exercised, assuming all borrowings are reimbursed at the first exercise date.
Daily liquidity monitoring is supplemented by quarterly stress tests presented to the ALM Committee based on counterparty assumptions that simulate the situation of projected liquidity in the event of particularly unfavorable hypotheses materializing. The applied stress tests plan the liquidity situation before and after prepayments. In accordance with the Basel II framework and its differentiated approach to risk, they calculate borrower default on the basis of outstanding loans weighted by the probability of default rate published by rating agencies for a given maturity and rating class. An internal rating is assigned to counterparties not rated by rating agencies (see “—Credit Risk—Internal rating process”). The CEB also evaluates the financial impact of a “crash” scenario where the default probability applied to “below investment grade” borrowers is 100% without possibility of recovery.
38
The Bank’s liquidity must also comply with the liquidity ratio (as discussed above under “—Prudential Framework—Liquidity Ratio”).
The liquidity risk mirrors the Bank’s projected treasury situation.
CEB LIQUIDITY POSITION AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013(1)
In thousand euros | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Current outstanding | Non-current outstanding | |||||||||||||||||||||||
31 December 2014 |
Up to 1 month |
1 to 3 months |
More than 3 months up to 1 year |
1 to 5 years |
More than 5 years |
Total | ||||||||||||||||||
Assets |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash in hand, balances with central banks |
203,897 | 203,897 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Available-for-sale financial assets |
384,711 | 625,731 | 1,848,256 | 1,402,775 | 630,529 | 4,892,001 | ||||||||||||||||||
Loans and advances to credit institutions and to customers |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Loans |
37,702 | 213,466 | 1,175,352 | 6,344,845 | 5,954,665 | 13,726,030 | ||||||||||||||||||
Advances |
1,599,181 | 700,074 | 2,299,255 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Financial assets held to maturity |
9,985 | 100,722 | 183,055 | 972,585 | 2,332,878 | 3,599,225 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Sub-total of assets |
2,235,476 | 1,639,993 | 3,206,662 | 8,720,205 | 8,918,071 | 24,720,407 | ||||||||||||||||||
Liabilities |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amounts owed to credit institutions and to customers |
157,714 | 126 | 128 | 47,503 | 53,637 | 259,109 | ||||||||||||||||||
Debt securities in issue |
829,833 | 1,060,556 | 3,323,785 | 11,554,998 | 4,343,847 | 21,113,018 | ||||||||||||||||||
Deposits of guarantees received |
1,122,720 | 1,122,720 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Social Dividend Account (SDA) |
70,296 | 70,296 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Sub-total of liabilities |
2,180,562 | 1,060,682 | 3,323,912 | 11,602,502 | 4,397,484 | 22,565,142 | ||||||||||||||||||
Off-balance sheet |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Financing commitments |
169,000 | 180,000 | 950,000 | 1,107,271 | 461,879 | 2,868,150 | ||||||||||||||||||
Term financial instruments |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
To be received |
847,758 | 1,181,878 | 3,481,528 | 10,459,759 | 1,881,539 | 17,852,461 | ||||||||||||||||||
To be paid |
(708,013 | ) | (1,019,548 | ) | (3,023,677 | ) | (9,411,402 | ) | (1,904,617 | ) | (16,067,257 | ) | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Sub-total of off-balance sheet |
308,745 | 342,330 | 1,407,851 | 2,155,628 | 438,801 | 4,653,355 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total by maturity 2014 |
363,659 | 921,641 | 1,290,600 | (726,668 | ) | 4,959,388 | 6,808,620 | |||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In thousand euros | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Current outstanding | Non-current outstanding | |||||||||||||||||||||||
31 December 2013 |
Up to 1 month |
1 to 3 months |
More than 3 months up to 1 year |
1 to 5 years |
More than 5 years |
Total | ||||||||||||||||||
Assets |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash in hand, balances with central banks |
286,640 | 286,640 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Available-for-sale financial assets |
781,540 | 547,638 | 1,393,956 | 1,294,919 | 701,229 | 4,719,282 | ||||||||||||||||||
Loans and advances to credit institutions and to customers |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Loans |
30,191 | 219,584 | 1,476,624 | 6,048,396 | 6,075,913 | 13,850,708 | ||||||||||||||||||
Advances |
1,328,928 | 1,333,389 | 145,375 | 2,807,693 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Financial assets held to maturity |
11,495 | 91,952 | 176,110 | 1,011,638 | 2,158,971 | 3,450,167 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Sub-total of assets |
2,438,794 | 2,192,564 | 3,192,065 | 8,354,954 | 8,936,114 | 25,114,489 | ||||||||||||||||||
Liabilities |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amounts owed to credit institutions and to customers |
127,063 | 130 | 158 | 34,497 | 67,247 | 229,095 | ||||||||||||||||||
Debt securities in issue |
1,000,649 | 1,118,554 | 2,943,307 | 12,710,284 | 3,224,838 | 20,997,631 | ||||||||||||||||||
Deposits of guarantees received |
401,659 | 401,659 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Social Dividend Account (SDA) |
73,906 | 73,906 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Sub-total of liabilities |
1,603,278 | 1,118,684 | 2,943,465 | 12,744,781 | 3,292,084 | 21,702,292 | ||||||||||||||||||
Off-balance sheet |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Financing commitments |
113,900 | 222,680 | 1,115,420 | 1,164,961 | 464,894 | 3,081,855 | ||||||||||||||||||
Term financial instruments |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
To be received |
782,702 | 689,166 | 3,179,385 | 12,239,439 | 1,635,026 | 18,525,718 | ||||||||||||||||||
To be paid |
(800,849 | ) | (524,285 | ) | (2,937,736 | ) | (12,029,670 | ) | (1,708,427 | ) | (18,000,968 | ) | ||||||||||||
Sub-total of off-balance sheet |
95,753 | 387,561 | 1,357,069 | 1,374,30 | 391,492 | 3,606,605 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total by maturity 2013 |
931,269 | 1,461,440 | 1,605,669 | (3,015,097 | ) | 6,035,521 | 7,018,802 |
39
(1) | The table features future and non-discounted contractual flows, including non-accrued interest, classified by maturity according to the outstanding duration between December 31, 2014 and the contractual maturity date. Off-balance sheet items consist of cash flows related to swaps entered into in the ordinary course of the Bank’s operations. |
The CEB defines operational risk as the risk of potential loss resulting from inadequate or failed internal processes, people and systems or from external events, including legal risk. Moreover, the CEB takes into account reputational risks linked to its activities. By deliberately choosing to apply the Basel Committee recommendations and best practices, the Bank is committed to constantly assessing its operational risks and to implementing the appropriate preventive measures. The operational risk framework is reviewed and approved at the biannual meetings of CORO and the extent of operational risk is calculated and presented in the quarterly risk report.
The Basic Indicator Approach (BIA) is adopted to calculate an operational risk charge against the Bank’s equity (defined as paid-in capital, reserves, gains or losses recognized directly in equity and profit for the year). The Bank calculates this capital charge on the basis of the average net banking income over the previous three years. As of December 31, 2014, the charge amounted to €24.0 million, up from €22.7 million as of December 31, 2013.
40
The CEB is administered, supervised and managed by a Governing Board, an Administrative Council, a Governor and an Auditing Board.1
Powers
The Governing Board is the supreme organ of the Bank and is vested with all powers that have not been delegated to the Administrative Council. The Articles specify certain functions and powers exercised by the Governing Board, including setting out the general orientations for the Bank’s activity and authorizing co-operation agreements with other international organizations, laying down the conditions for Bank membership, deciding capital increases, and approving the annual Report of the Governor, the accounts and the Bank’s general balance sheet. It elects its own Chairman and the Chairman of the Administrative Council and appoints the Governor, the Vice-Governors and the members of the Auditing Board.
The Governing Board is also required to state a position on the recommendations and opinions transmitted to it by the Committee of Ministers and the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe.
Decision-making
The discussions and decisions of the Governing Board are not valid unless two-thirds of its members are present. Each Member State of the CEB has one vote for each participating certificate held by it. Any Member State that has failed to pay required capital that has come due may not, for as long as such non-payment persists, exercise the voting rights corresponding to the sum due and not paid up.
Decisions are reached by a majority of the Members voting in favor or against and holding two-thirds of the votes cast. A majority of three-quarters of the Member States voting in favor or against and holding three-quarters of the votes cast is required for assuming, under exceptional circumstances and for a specified period, powers delegated to the Administrative Council. The same majority is required for adjusting the apportionment of ownership not resulting from the admission of new Member States. A unanimous vote is required for suspending or terminating the Bank’s operations and amending the Articles, although any change in the stated aims of the Bank expressed in the Articles requires approval of the Committee of Ministers.
Composition
The Governing Board is composed of a Chairman and one representative appointed by each Member State, which as a general rule is the Member State’s ambassador to the Council of Europe in Strasbourg, France.
The Chairman reports on the Bank’s activities to the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe and to the Committee of Ministers at least once a year and forwards the Annual Report of the Governor to the Committee of Ministers. Each Member State of the Bank is entitled to present a candidate for the Chairmanship.
The Secretary General of the Council of Europe or his representative is entitled to participate in the meetings of the Governing Board without the right to vote. As a general rule, the Governor or his representative, the Bank’s legal adviser and the Secretariat of the organs also participate in meetings.
Powers
The Administrative Council possesses all those powers delegated to it by the Governing Board under the Articles, although the Governing Board may reassume such powers from the Administrative Council in exceptional circumstances for a specified period. Among other functions, the Administrative Council establishes and supervises operational policies, approves loan projects and votes on the Bank’s operating budget. The Administrative Council may at any time appoint committees from among its members and delegate specified powers to such committees.
1 | The Bank’s organs are: the Governing Board, the Administrative Council, the Governor and the Auditing Board. In accordance with Article XIII, the secretariat of the Bank’s organs is provided by the Secretariat of the Partial Agreement on the Council of Europe Development Bank in Strasbourg (Head of the Partial Agreement: Ms Giusi Pajardi; Executive Secretary to the Organs: Mr György Bergou). |
41
Decision-making
Decisions of the Administrative Council are only valid if two-thirds of its Member States’ representatives are present. Each Member State possesses one vote for each participating certificate held by it. Most decisions of the Administrative Council are taken by a vote with simple majority of the votes cast, although some require a majority of the Member States (not counting those Member States which abstain from voting) and a majority of the votes cast. These include decisions on proposals and opinions addressed to the Governing Board concerning (i) adjustments to the Bank’s capital and its apportionment, increases or reductions in the authorized capital; (ii) the suspension or termination of the Bank’s operations and, in the event of liquidation, distribution of its assets; (iii) the appointment of the members of the Auditing Board; and (iv) the appointment of the external auditor and establishment of his terms of reference. In addition, the Administrative Council takes, by simple majority of the Member States and a majority of two-thirds of the votes cast, decisions regarding investment projects that have not received an opinion as to admissibility.
Composition
The Administrative Council is composed of a Chairman appointed by the Governing Board for a three-year term and one representative appointed by each Member State, as a general rule from the ministry of finance of the Member State. Its Chairman is elected by the Governing Board. The term of office of the Chairman is three years and is renewable for a second three-year term. The Chairman does not have the right to vote.
The Secretary General of the Council of Europe may participate in or be represented at the meetings. As a general rule, the Governor or his representative, the Bank’s legal adviser and the Secretariat of the organs also participate in meetings. The Administrative Council may, when it deems necessary, invite representatives of international organizations or any other interested person to participate in its proceedings, but such invitees do not have the right to vote.
Current Membership of the Governing Board and the Administrative Council
The following are the representatives to the Governing Board and Administrative Council of the CEB as of December 31, 2014 (unless otherwise indicated).
GOVERNING BOARD | ADMINISTRATIVE COUNCIL | |||
Dominique LAMIOT Administrator General of Public Finance and Director of Public Finance for Hauts-de-Seine, Nanterre |
Chairpersons | Joseph LICARI Former Permanent Representative of Malta to the Council of Europe, Strasbourg | ||
Tomáš BOČEK Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary, Permanent Representative of the Czech Republic to the Council of Europe, Strasbourg |
Vice-Chairs | Zoran ĆIROVIĆ Chairman, Securities Commission of the Republic of Serbia, Belgrade | ||
Ardiana HOBDARI Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary, Permanent Representative of Albania to the Council of Europe, Strasbourg |
Albania | Erjon LUÇI Deputy Minister, Ministry of Finance, Tirana | ||
Dirk VAN EECKHOUT Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary, Permanent Representative of Belgium to the Council of Europe, Strasbourg |
Belgium | Franciscus GODTS Administrator, International and European Financial Affairs, Federal Public Service Finances, Brussels | ||
Gino ALZETTA (since February 16, 2015) Advisor, Head International and European Financial Affairs, Belgian Federal Treasury, Brussels |
42
GOVERNING BOARD | ADMINISTRATIVE COUNCIL | |||
Almir SĂHOVIĆ Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary, Permanent Representative of Bosnia and Herzegovina to the Council of Europe, Strasbourg |
Bosnia and Herzegovina | Ljerka MARIĆ Director, Directorate for Economic Planning, Council of Ministers, Sarajevo | ||
Krassimira BESHKOVA Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary, Permanent Representative of Bulgaria to the Council of Europe, Strasbourg |
Bulgaria | Gergana BEREMSKA Director, Directorate of International Financial Institutions and Cooperation, Ministry of Finance, Sofia | ||
Miroslav PAPA Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary, Permanent Representative of Croatia to the Council of Europe, Strasbourg |
Croatia | Igor RAÐENOVIĆ Deputy Minister, Ministry of Finance, Zagreb | ||
Theodora CONSTANTINIDOU Ambassador, Permanent Representative of Cyprus to the Council of Europe, Strasbourg |
Cyprus | Christos PATSALIDES Permanent Secretary, Ministry of Finance, Nicosia | ||
Tomáš BOČEK Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary, Permanent Representative of the Czech Republic to the Council of Europe, Strasbourg |
Czech Republic | Petr PAVELEK Director of the Debt and Financial Assets Management Department, Ministry of Finance, Prague | ||
Klavs A. HOLM Ambassador, Permanent Representative of Denmark to the OECD, Paris |
Denmark | Thomas BØRNER Senior Advisor, Department of Finance, Ministry of Finance, Copenhagen | ||
Gea RENNEL Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary Permanent Representative of Estonia to the Council of Europe, Strasbourg |
Estonia | Martin PÕDER Head of the EU and International Affairs Department, Ministry of Finance, Tallinn | ||
Pekka HYVÖNEN Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary, Permanent Representative of Finland to the Council of Europe, Strasbourg |
Finland | Kristina SARJO Director, Financial Markets Department, Unit for International Affairs, Ministry of Finance, Helsinki | ||
Jocelyne CABALLERO Ambassador, Permanent Representative of France to the Council of Europe, Strasbourg |
France | Alice TERRACOL Head of Bilateral Relations and European Financial Instruments, Treasury Department, Ministry of Economy and Finance, Paris | ||
Konstantin KORKELIA Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary, Permanent Representative of Georgia to the Council of Europe, Strasbourg |
Georgia | David LEZHAVA Deputy Minister, Ministry of Finance, Tbilisi | ||
Julius Georg LUY Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary, Permanent Representative of Germany to the Council of Europe, Strasbourg |
Germany | Klaus STEIN Deputy Director General, Financial Market Policy Department, Ministry of Finance, Berlin |
43
GOVERNING BOARD | ADMINISTRATIVE COUNCIL | |||
Iraklis ASTERIADIS Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary, Permanent Representative of Greece to the Council of Europe, Strasbourg |
Greece | Paraskevi PROTOPAPPA (Substitute) Head of Department for International Financial Organisations, Ministry of Development, Competitiveness, Infrastructure and Networks, Athens | ||
Mgr Paolo RUDELLI Special Envoy and Permanent Observer of the Holy See to the Council of Europe, Strasbourg |
Holy See | Mgr Ignazio CEFFALIA Deputy Permanent Observer of the Holy See to the Council of Europe, Strasbourg | ||
Ferenc ROBÁK Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary, Permanent Representative of Hungary to the Council of Europe, Strasbourg |
Hungary | Endre TÖRÖK Deputy Head of Department for International Finance, Ministry for National Economy, Budapest | ||
Berglind ÁSGEIRSDÓTTIR Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary, Permanent Representative of Iceland to the Council of Europe, Paris |
Iceland | Ólafur SIGURÐSSON Director, Directorate for External Trade and Economic Affairs, Ministry for Foreign Affairs, Reykjavik | ||
Peter GUNNING Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary, Permanent Representative of Ireland to the Council of Europe, Strasbourg |
Ireland | Frederick COOPER Principal Officer, International Institutions, Department of Finance, Dublin | ||
Manuel JACOANGELI Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary, Permanent Representative of Italy to the Council of Europe, Strasbourg |
Italy | Bruno MANGIATORDI Director General, Directorate VI of the Treasury Department, Ministry of Economy and Finance, Rome | ||
Edon CANA Consul General of Kosovo, Strasbourg |
Kosovo | Arjeta NEZIRAJ Deputy Director of Department of Treasury, Ministry of Finance, Pristina | ||
Rolands LAPPUĶE Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary, Permanent Representative of Latvia to the Council of Europe, Strasbourg |
Latvia | Inta VASARAUDZE Director, Department of Economic Analysis, Ministry of Finance, Riga |
Liechtenstein
Daniel OSPELT
Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary, Permanent Representative of Liechtenstein to the Council of Europe, Strasbourg
Vytautas LEŠKEVIČIUS Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary, Permanent Representative of Lithuania to the Council of Europe, Strasbourg Ugnė MATULEVIČIENĖ (since February 18, 2015) Chargé d’Affaires a.i., Deputy Permanent Representative of Lithuania to the Council of Europe, Strasbourg |
Lithuania | Aloyzas VITKAUSKAS Vice-Minister, Ministry of Finance, Vilnius | ||
Michèle EISENBARTH Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary, Permanent Representative of Luxembourg to the Council of Europe, Strasbourg |
Luxembourg | Arsène JACOBY Senior Advisor, Ministry of Finance, Luxembourg | ||
Joseph FILLETTI Ambassador, Permanent Representative of Malta to the Council of Europe, Strasbourg |
Malta | Tania CARABOTT Deputy Permanent Representative of Malta to the Council of Europe, Strasbourg |
44
GOVERNING BOARD | ADMINISTRATIVE COUNCIL | |||
Tatiana PÂRVU Ambassador, Permanent Representative of the Republic of Moldova to the Council of Europe, Strasbourg |
Moldova (Republic of) |
Roman CAZAN (Substitute) Deputy Secretary General of the Government, Chişinau | ||
Ana VUKADINOVIĆ Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary, Permanent Representative of Montenegro to the Council of Europe, Strasbourg |
Montenegro | Nikola VUKIĆEVIĆ Deputy Minister for Budget, Ministry of Finance, Podgorica | ||
Onno ELDERENBOSCH Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary, Permanent Representative of the Netherlands to the Council of Europe, Strasbourg |
Netherlands | Jan HEIDSMA Advisor, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, The Hague | ||
Astrid HELLE Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary, Permanent Representative of Norway to the Council of Europe, Strasbourg |
Norway | Carola BJØRKLUND Coordinator for Council of Europe Affairs, Ambassador, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Oslo | ||
Robert DRZAZGA Chargé d’Affaires a.i., Deputy Permanent Representative of Poland to the Council of Europe, Strasbourg |
Poland | Artur RADZIWIŁŁ Undersecretary of State, Ministry of Finance, Warsaw | ||
Luís Filipe CASTRO MENDES Ambassador, Permanent Representative of Portugal to the Council of Europe, Strasbourg |
Portugal | José MORENO Adviser, Office for Economic Policy and International Affairs, Ministry of Finance, Lisbon | ||
Cristian URSE Chargé d’Affaires a.i., Deputy Permanent Representative of Romania to the Council of Europe, Strasbourg |
Romania | Boni CUCU General Director, International Financial Relations General Directorate, Ministry of Public Finance, Bucharest | ||
Guido BELLATTI CECCOLI Ambassador, Permanent Representative of San Marino to the Council of Europe, Strasbourg |
San Marino | Nicola CECCAROLI Counsellor, Ministry of Finance, San Marino | ||
Zoran POPOVIĆ Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary, Permanent Representative of Serbia to the Council of Europe, Strasbourg |
Serbia | Zoran ĆIROVIĆ Chairman, Securities Commission of the Republic of Serbia, Belgrade | ||
Drahoslav ŠTEFÁNEK Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary, Permanent Representative of the Slovak Republic to the Council of Europe, Strasbourg |
Slovak Republic | Martina KOBILICOVÁ Director General, Department of International Relations, Ministry of Finance, Bratislava | ||
Barbara SUŠNIK Chargé d’Affaires a.i., Deputy Permanent Representative of Slovenia to the Council of Europe, Strasbourg |
Slovenia | Martin ZDOVC Undersecretary of State, International Finance Department, Ministry of Finance, Ljubljana | ||
Javier GIL CATALINA Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary, Permanent Representative of Spain to the Council of Europe, Strasbourg |
Spain | Jorge DAJANI GONZALEZ Director General of Macroeconomic Analysis and International Economy, Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness, Madrid | ||
Torbjörn HAAK Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary, Permanent Representative of Sweden to the Council of Europe, Strasbourg |
Sweden | Eva HAGHANIPOUR Director, International Department, Ministry of Finance, Stockholm Susanne OLSSON (since January 1, 2015) Desk Officer, International Department, Ministry of Finance, Stockholm |
45
GOVERNING BOARD | ADMINISTRATIVE COUNCIL | |||
Markus BÖRLIN Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary, Permanent Representative of Switzerland to the Council of Europe, Strasbourg |
Switzerland | Jürg SCHNEIDER (Substitute) Counsellor and Delegate to the Development Assistance Committee (DAC), Swiss Delegation to the OECD, Paris | ||
Petar POP-ARSOV Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary, Permanent Representative of “the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia” to the Council of Europe, Strasbourg |
“the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia” | Natasa STOJMANOVSKA State Secretary, Ministry of Finance, Skopje | ||
Erdoğan İŞCAN Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary, Permanent Representative of Turkey to the Council of Europe, Strasbourg |
Turkey | Hakan TOKAÇ Director General, General Directorate for Foreign Economic Relations, Undersecretariat of Treasury, Ankara |
The Governor of the CEB is the Bank’s legal representative and represents the CEB in all of its transactions and legal proceedings. The Governor is the head of the Bank’s operational services and is responsible for carrying out the day-to-day business and operating activities of the CEB based on the guidelines and the authorizations of the Administrative Council. He is responsible for the organization of the CEB’s operational services and for the Bank’s staff within the framework of the regulations adopted by the Administrative Council. He is assisted by one or more Vice-Governors and replaced by one of them if necessary. Pursuant to the Bank’s Articles of Agreement, the Vice-Governors are appointed by the Governing Board based on a proposal from the Governor, following an opinion on conformity from the Administrative Council and after consultation with the members of the Governing Board. The Governor determines the responsibilities of the Vice-Governors taking into account post descriptions approved by the Administrative Council.
The Governor and Vice-Governors are each appointed by the Governing Board for a five year term (renewable once in the case of first-time appointments after November 2010). The current Governor and Vice-Governors are the following:
Governor and Vice-Governors |
Position with CEB as at April 1, 2015 |
Years with CEB |
Expiration of Current Term | |||
Rolf Wenzel | Governor | 3 | December 17, 2016 | |||
Apolonio Ruiz-Ligero | Vice-Governor Social Development Strategy | 13 | December 17, 2016 | |||
Nunzio Guglielmino | Vice-Governor Financial Strategy | 14 | October 31, 2015 | |||
Mikolaj Dowgielewicz | Vice-Governor Target Countries | 3 | May 1, 2017 |
46
Powers
The Auditing Board is required by the Articles to inspect the CEB’s accounts and verify that the operational accounts and balance sheet are in order, to certify in an annual report that the balance sheet and operational accounts accord with the books and records of the Bank, that they give an accurate and true picture of the state of the CEB’s affairs, and that the CEB is being managed according to the principles of sound financial management. Its audit is required to be conducted in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards.
The Auditing Board, as an independent supervisory body of the Bank’s activities, is entitled, separately from other controlling entities, to examine specific projects financed by the Bank. The audit may take place by review of documentation at the Bank and/or, in exceptional cases, and subject to the agreement of the Governor, by on-site visits. The Auditing Board has regular access to reports on internal audit activities, which includes a list of internal audits completed, audits in progress and status reports of audit findings. Moreover, the Auditing Board has full access to or may request for review all internal documents which it deems necessary to examine in order to carry out its duties. The Auditing Board may use external experts in cases where it is faced with a particular problem for which it requires specialized technical expertise that is not available among its members.
The Governor is required to inform the Auditing Board about the tenders for the appointment of the external auditor. Thereupon, the Auditing Board presents its opinion on the choice of the external auditor to the Administrative Council and the Governing Board as well as to the Governor and the Secretariat of the Partial Agreement.
Following the end of Deloitte & Associés’ three-year term on December 31, 2011, KPMG was selected by the Governing Board to be the Bank’s external auditor for the years 2012, 2013 and 2014.
Composition
The Auditing Board is composed of three members originating from the Member States of the CEB. The Governing Board appoints the members of the Auditing Board, including substitute members, according to a rotation scheme. The Member States are invited to present candidates having significant professional experience in the financial audit field. The term of office of each member is three years and not more than one member is permitted to retire each year. Outgoing members are required to attend the meetings of the Auditing Board as an advisor until the next rotation becomes effective the following year.
The current members of the Auditing Board and their principal professions as of April 1, 2015, are René Brülhart (President of the Financial Information Authority, Vatican City), Dubravka Flinta (Head of National Fund Sector, Ministry of Finance, Zagreb) and Maria Poulaki (Member of the Management Organization Unit Expert Team, Athens, Greece).
Over the years, the CEB has increased its staff numbers in accordance with the development of its activities. Thus, at year-end 2014, the Bank had a total of 183 permanent staff members, in addition to appointed officials. At the same time, the Bank has also taken care to ensure that its staff reflects as closely as possible the different nationalities represented by its Member States. The number of nationalities represented at the Bank has thus grown from 14 in 1994 to 29 at year-end 2014. It is important to note that, with an average age of 47 years, an average length of service of 11 years and a low rate of turnover standing at around 6.0 %, the Bank enjoys a high level of experience and expertise among its staff. Particular attention is also paid to the question of gender parity. At year-end 2014, the breakdown among the staff was 52% women and 48% men. Among the professional staff, assigned to study, design and managerial activities, the proportion of women stood at 42%.
47
This ‘18-K’ Filing | Date | Other Filings | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
5/1/17 | ||||
12/17/16 | ||||
10/31/15 | ||||
Filed on: | 4/17/15 | |||
4/16/15 | ||||
4/15/15 | ||||
4/1/15 | ||||
2/18/15 | ||||
2/16/15 | ||||
1/1/15 | ||||
For Period End: | 12/31/14 | |||
1/1/14 | ||||
12/31/13 | 18-K, 18-K/A | |||
11/22/13 | ||||
11/14/13 | ||||
12/31/12 | 18-K, 18-K/A | |||
1/1/12 | ||||
12/31/11 | 18-K, 18-K/A | |||
2/4/11 | ||||
12/31/10 | 18-K, 18-K/A | |||
List all Filings |